diff --git "a/README.md" "b/README.md" --- "a/README.md" +++ "b/README.md" @@ -8,18 +8,19 @@ tags: metrics: - accuracy widget: -- text: Despite the overall trend of mass loss, some glaciers in the western Himalayas - exhibited small gains in mass between 2000 and 2016. -- text: This study focuses on analyzing traffic data from roads with a design speed - of at least 80 km/h and a daily traffic volume exceeding 10,000 vehicles. -- text: This paper explores the intricacies of memory storage at the molecular level, - focusing on the interplay between genes and synapses. -- text: This chapter explores the calculation of chemical reactivity indexes using - density functional theory, providing a comprehensive analysis of their applicability - and accuracy in predicting chemical reactions. -- text: Prospect theory, introduced by Kahneman and Tversky (1979), has significantly - advanced our understanding of decision-making under risk and uncertainty in mathematical - economics and behavioral finance. +- text: This paper explores the design and implementation of identity-based cryptosystems + and signature schemes to address the challenges of secure user identification + and digital signature verification in computer networks. +- text: In primary human immunodeficiency virus type 1 syndrome, the initial control + of viremia is temporally associated with the activation of specific CD8+ T-cell + responses against HIV-1 epitopes. +- text: Further investigations are required to determine the nature of this new boson + and its implications for the Standard Model of particle physics. +- text: Macrophages were isolated from the peritoneal cavity of mice through intraperitoneal + injection of thioglycollate broth and subsequent peritoneal lavage. +- text: The presence of antinutritional factors in plant-derived alternate fish feed + ingredients may negatively impact nutrient absorption and growth performance in + fish, suggesting the need for further research into mitigation strategies. pipeline_tag: text-classification inference: true base_model: sentence-transformers/all-MiniLM-L6-v2 @@ -35,7 +36,7 @@ model-index: split: test metrics: - type: accuracy - value: 0.7116504854368932 + value: 0.7492307692307693 name: Accuracy --- @@ -55,7 +56,7 @@ The model has been trained using an efficient few-shot learning technique that i - **Sentence Transformer body:** [sentence-transformers/all-MiniLM-L6-v2](https://huggingface.co/sentence-transformers/all-MiniLM-L6-v2) - **Classification head:** a [LogisticRegression](https://scikit-learn.org/stable/modules/generated/sklearn.linear_model.LogisticRegression.html) instance - **Maximum Sequence Length:** 256 tokens -- **Number of Classes:** 103 classes +- **Number of Classes:** 13 classes @@ -67,118 +68,28 @@ The model has been trained using an efficient few-shot learning technique that i - **Blogpost:** [SetFit: Efficient Few-Shot Learning Without Prompts](https://huggingface.co/blog/setfit) ### Model Labels -| Label | Examples | -|:-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|:---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| -| Acknowledging limitation(s) whilst stating a finding or contribution | | -| Advising cautious interpretation of the findings | | -| Commenting on the findings | | -| Commenting on the strengths of the current study | | -| Comparing the result: contradicting previous findings | | -| Comparing the result: supporting previous findings | | -| Contrasting sources with ‘however’ for emphasis | | -| Describing previously used methods | | -| Describing questionnaire design | | -| Describing the characteristics of the participants | | -| Describing the limitations of the current study | | -| Describing the process: adverbs of manner | | -| Describing the process: expressing purpose with for | | -| Describing the process: infinitive of purpose | | -| Describing the process: sequence words | | -| Describing the process: statistical procedures | | -| Describing the process: typical verbs in the passive form | | -| Describing the process: using + instrument | | -| Describing the research design and the methods used | | -| Describing what other writers do in their published work | | -| Detailing specific limitations | | -| Establishing the importance of the topic for the discipline | | -| Establishing the importance of the topic for the discipline: time frame given | | -| Establishing the importance of the topic for the world or society | | -| Establishing the importance of the topic for the world or society: time frame given | | -| Establising the importance of the topic as a problem to be addressed | | -| Explaining keywords (also refer to Defining Terms) | | -| Explaining the provenance of articles for review | | -| Explaining the provenance of the participants | | -| Explaining the significance of the current study | | -| Explaining the significance of the findings or contribution of the study | | -| General comments on the relevant literature | | -| General reference to previous research or scholarship: highlighting negative outcomes | | -| Giving reasons for personal interest in the research (sometimes found in the humanities, and the applied human sciences) | | -| Giving reasons why a particular method was adopted | | -| Giving reasons why a particular method was rejected | | -| Highlighting inadequacies or weaknesses of previous studies (also refer to Being Critical) | | -| Highlighting interesting or surprising results | | -| Highlighting significant data in a table or chart | | -| Identifying a controversy within the field of study | | -| Identifying a knowledge gap in the field of study | | -| Implications and/or recommendations for practice or policy | | -| Indicating an expected outcome | | -| Indicating an unexpected outcome | | -| Indicating criteria for selection or inclusion in the study | | -| Indicating methodological problems or limitations | | -| Indicating missing, weak, or contradictory evidence | | -| Indicating the methodology for the current research | | -| Indicating the use of an established method | | -| Introducing the limitations of the current study | | -| Making recommendations for further research work | | -| Noting implications of the findings | | -| Noting the lack of or paucity of previous research | | -| Offering an explanation for the findings | | -| Outlining the structure of a short paper | | -| Outlining the structure of a thesis or dissertation | | -| Pointing out interesting or important findings | | -| Previewing a chapter | | -| Previous research: A historic perspective | | -| Previous research: Approaches taken | | -| Previous research: What has been established or proposed | | -| Previous research: area investigated as the sentence object | | -| Previous research: area investigated as the sentence subject | | -| Previous research: highlighting negative outcomes | | -| Providing background information: reference to the literature | | -| Providing background information: reference to the purpose of the study | | -| Reference to previous research: important studies | | -| Referring back to the purpose of the paper or study | | -| Referring back to the research aims or procedures | | -| Referring to a single investigation in the past: investigation prominent | | -| Referring to a single investigation in the past: researcher prominent | | -| Referring to another writer’s idea(s) or position | | -| Referring to data in a table or chart | | -| Referring to important texts in the area of interest | | -| Referring to previous work to establish what is already known | | -| Referring to secondary sources | | -| Referring to the literature to justify a method or approach | | -| Reporting positive and negative reactions | | -| Restating a result or one of several results | | -| Setting out the research questions or hypotheses | | -| Some ways of introducing quotations | | -| Stating a negative result | | -| Stating a positive result | | -| Stating purpose of the current research with reference to gaps or issues in the literature | | -| Stating the aims of the current research (note frequent use of past tense) | | -| Stating the focus, aim, or argument of a short paper | | -| Stating the purpose of the thesis, dissertation, or research article (note use of present tense) | | -| Stating what is currently known about the topic | | -| Suggesting general hypotheses | | -| Suggesting implications for what is already known | | -| Suggestions for future work | | -| Summarising the literature review | | -| Summarising the main research findings | | -| Summarising the results section | | -| Summarising the studies reviewed | | -| Surveys and interviews: Introducing excerpts from interview data | | -| Surveys and interviews: Reporting participants’ views | | -| Surveys and interviews: Reporting proportions | | -| Surveys and interviews: Reporting response rates | | -| Surveys and interviews: Reporting themes | | -| Synthesising sources: contrasting evidence or ideas | | -| Synthesising sources: supporting evidence or ideas | | -| Transition: moving to the next result | | +| Label | Examples | +|:----------------|:----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| Aims | | +| Background | | +| Hypothesis | | +| Implications | | +| Importance | | +| Keywords | | +| Limitations | | +| Method | | +| None | | +| Purpose | | +| Reccomendations | | +| Result | | +| Uncertainty | | ## Evaluation ### Metrics | Label | Accuracy | |:--------|:---------| -| **all** | 0.7117 | +| **all** | 0.7492 | ## Uses @@ -198,7 +109,7 @@ from setfit import SetFitModel # Download from the 🤗 Hub model = SetFitModel.from_pretrained("Corran/SciGenSetfit") # Run inference -preds = model("Despite the overall trend of mass loss, some glaciers in the western Himalayas exhibited small gains in mass between 2000 and 2016.") +preds = model("Further investigations are required to determine the nature of this new boson and its implications for the Standard Model of particle physics.") ```