Update README.md
Browse files
README.md
CHANGED
@@ -9,4 +9,48 @@ base_model:
|
|
9 |
- DeepGlint-AI/mlcd-vit-large-patch14-336
|
10 |
---
|
11 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12 |
We would like to express our gratitude to [Huajie Tan](https://huggingface.co/tanhuajie2001), [Yumeng Wang](https://huggingface.co/devymex), [Yin Xie](https://huggingface.co/Yin-Xie) for his significant contributions to the experimental validation in MLLMs.
|
|
|
9 |
- DeepGlint-AI/mlcd-vit-large-patch14-336
|
10 |
---
|
11 |
|
12 |
+
|
13 |
+
[[Paper]](https://arxiv.org/abs/2407.17331) [[GitHub]](https://github.com/deepglint/unicom)
|
14 |
+
|
15 |
+
## Performance in RoboVQA and OpenEQA
|
16 |
+
|
17 |
+
|
18 |
+
|
19 |
+
| | | MLCD-Embodied-7B | LLaVA OneVision-7B | GPT-4V | RoboMamba |
|
20 |
+
|----------------|-------------------|-------------------|--------------------|--------|-----------|
|
21 |
+
| **RoboVQA** | BLEU1 | **73.16** | 38.12 | - | 54.9 |
|
22 |
+
| | BLEU2 | **66.39** | 33.56 | - | 44.2 |
|
23 |
+
| | BLEU3 | **60.61** | 31.76 | - | 39.5 |
|
24 |
+
| | BLEU4 | **56.56** | 30.97 | - | 36.3 |
|
25 |
+
| **OpenEQA** | OBJECT-STATE-RECOGNITION | **71.83** | - | 63.2 | - |
|
26 |
+
| | OBJECT-RECOGNITION | **49.46** | - | 43.4 | - |
|
27 |
+
| | FUNCTIONAL-REASONING | 54.38 | - | **57.4** | - |
|
28 |
+
| | SPATIAL-UNDERSTANDING | **48.64** | - | 33.6 | - |
|
29 |
+
| | ATTRIBUTE-RECOGNITION | **67.08** | - | 57.2 | - |
|
30 |
+
| | WORLD-KNOWLEDGE | **53.87** | - | 50.7 | - |
|
31 |
+
| | OBJECT-LOCALIZATION | **43.06** | - | 42.0 | - |
|
32 |
+
|
33 |
+
|
34 |
+
|
35 |
+
|
36 |
+
## General Ability Evaluation: Comparison with LLaVA OneVision-7B and GPT-4
|
37 |
+
|
38 |
+
| Dataset | Split | MLCD-Embodied-7B | LLaVA OneVision-7B | GPT-4v | GPT-4o |
|
39 |
+
| :-- | :-: | :-: | :-: | :-: | :-: |
|
40 |
+
| A12D | test | 79.9 | 81.4 | 78.2 | 94.2 |
|
41 |
+
| ChartQA | test | 83.0 | 80.0 | 78.5 | 85.7 |
|
42 |
+
| DocVQA | test | 91.6 | 87.5 | 88.4 | 92.8 |
|
43 |
+
| InfoVQA | val | 73.9 | 70.7 | - | - |
|
44 |
+
| InfoVQA | test | 70.0 | 68.8 | - | - |
|
45 |
+
| MMMU | val | 47.3 | 48.8 | 56.8 | 69.1 |
|
46 |
+
| MMStar | test | 58.5 | 61.7 | 57.1 | 63.9 |
|
47 |
+
| OCRBench | - | 749.0 | 697.0 | 656.0 | 805.0 |
|
48 |
+
| RealWorldQA | test | 68.9 | 66.3 | 61.4 | 58.6 |
|
49 |
+
| SeedBench | image | 74.9 | 75.4 | 49.9 | 76.2 |
|
50 |
+
| MMbench | en-dev | 81.1 | 83.2 | 81.3 | 83.4 |
|
51 |
+
| MMbench | en-test | 80.1 | 80.8 | 75.0 | - |
|
52 |
+
| MME | test | 578/1603 | 418/1580 | 517/1409 | - |
|
53 |
+
|
54 |
+
|
55 |
+
|
56 |
We would like to express our gratitude to [Huajie Tan](https://huggingface.co/tanhuajie2001), [Yumeng Wang](https://huggingface.co/devymex), [Yin Xie](https://huggingface.co/Yin-Xie) for his significant contributions to the experimental validation in MLLMs.
|