Jasontth commited on
Commit
2e1c07f
1 Parent(s): 9129239

Update README.md

Browse files
Files changed (1) hide show
  1. README.md +2 -22
README.md CHANGED
@@ -21,34 +21,14 @@ widget:
21
  <!-- This model card has been generated automatically according to the information the Trainer had access to. You
22
  should probably proofread and complete it, then remove this comment. -->
23
 
24
- # results
25
-
26
  This model is a fine-tuned version of [roberta-base](https://huggingface.co/roberta-base) on Jasontth/climate_fever_plus (https://huggingface.co/datasets/Jasontth/climate_fever_plus), enlarged CLIMATE-FEVER dataset (The dataset provided combines the Climate-Fever dataset and claim reviews from the website Climate Feedback (https://climatefeedback.org/)
27
 
28
  For detail, please read [this paper](https://jasontth.github.io/researches/research7.html)
29
 
 
 
30
  It achieves the following results on the test set:
31
  - Loss: 0.6970
32
  - Accuracy: 0.7288
33
  - F1: 0.7229
34
 
35
-
36
- ### Training hyperparameters
37
-
38
- The following hyperparameters were used during training:
39
- - learning_rate: 1e-05
40
- - train_batch_size: 16
41
- - eval_batch_size: 32
42
- - seed: 42
43
- - optimizer: Adam with betas=(0.9,0.999) and epsilon=1e-08
44
- - lr_scheduler_type: linear
45
- - lr_scheduler_warmup_steps: 500
46
- - num_epochs: 10
47
- - mixed_precision_training: Native AMP
48
-
49
- ### Framework versions
50
-
51
- - Transformers 4.35.2
52
- - Pytorch 2.1.0+cu121
53
- - Datasets 2.15.0
54
- - Tokenizers 0.15.0
 
21
  <!-- This model card has been generated automatically according to the information the Trainer had access to. You
22
  should probably proofread and complete it, then remove this comment. -->
23
 
 
 
24
  This model is a fine-tuned version of [roberta-base](https://huggingface.co/roberta-base) on Jasontth/climate_fever_plus (https://huggingface.co/datasets/Jasontth/climate_fever_plus), enlarged CLIMATE-FEVER dataset (The dataset provided combines the Climate-Fever dataset and claim reviews from the website Climate Feedback (https://climatefeedback.org/)
25
 
26
  For detail, please read [this paper](https://jasontth.github.io/researches/research7.html)
27
 
28
+ # results
29
+
30
  It achieves the following results on the test set:
31
  - Loss: 0.6970
32
  - Accuracy: 0.7288
33
  - F1: 0.7229
34