| The preface of "The Organic Theory of Society" serves as the opening statement to this comprehensive social philosophy. In it, the author introduces readers to the core concept and purpose behind the theory – an ideal society where a unique White People live in one land with a single way of life, emphasizing self-sufficiency, family bonds, community engagement, and selfless actions. This introduction sets the stage for understanding how this organic approach differs from many ills present in modern societies such as consumerism and usury. The author highlights that the organic society is based on a network of White Families where each member can maintain their own household without needing to rely on external factors like money, power, or material possessions. This self-sufficient lifestyle allows individuals to focus more on personal relationships and community involvement rather than engaging in wasteful consumption or greedy behavior that harms others. The preface also emphasizes the importance of preserving tradition within an organic society. By maintaining their cultural heritage, this unique White People can foster a sense of belonging and continuity for future generations to come. This idea is not just confined to family bonds; it extends to community involvement as well, promoting selfless actions that benefit the common good over individual interests. In conclusion, the preface of "The Organic Theory of Society" serves as an invitation into a world where White People can live harmonious lives based on personal relationships and community engagement rather than consumerism or material gain. By introducing readers to this unique approach to society, the author challenges them to reimagine what it means to thrive in their own communities while preserving their traditions for future generations. The text appears to discuss historical economic and social changes, particularly focusing on the shift from feudalism to capitalism and its impact on various classes within society. It mentions that under feudalism, people were part of a tight-knit community with common culture and values; however, this changed as cities became dominated by merchants who had more power than artisans or workers due to legal restrictions placed upon them for the benefit of money lenders in London. The usurers gained control over the market, leading to evictions and forced labor for rural land holders and peasants, while craftsmen were left with no organization allowed under law, effectively losing all real freedom. The author suggests that this reorganization of society was done at the expense of justice and human rights, particularly for those who lost their lands or livelihoods as a result of these economic shifts. They argue that such changes led to a loss of culture and tradition within communities and were ultimately used to justify capitalism's rise in modern times. The text dedicates itself to the memory of individuals who resisted this reorganization, including those who fought against unjust extractions by Henry the Seventh and others who stood up for their rights during various historical events. It also acknowledges contemporary dissidents fighting similar battles today, particularly those embracing traditional values such as family, community, and cultural heritage. Overall, the text seems to be making an appeal to readers to consider the broader implications of economic systems on society's structure and its effects on individuals who were historically disenfranchised or exploited in favor of wealthier interests. It advocates for a return to traditional values and community-based structures that prioritize human rights and justice, as well as honoring those who have fought against these social injustices throughout history. This is a historical and political statement that discusses the origins of modern capitalism and its impact on various social groups, particularly commoners and peasants. It asserts that during the early Modern Era, there was a deliberate effort to create an "unfree" labor force by displacing artisans from their crafts in favor of cheap wage labor. This change led to forced labor and loss of land for many rural people while also affecting urban artisans. The statement argues that the market became more important than justice, and it criticizes the legal framework that enabled such actions as unjust and harmful to the commoners' way of life. It honors those who resisted these changes in favor of ancient customs and rights. Finally, the text dedicates itself to contemporary individuals and groups fighting against modernity, materialism, atheism, oligarchy, and liberalism. The statement concludes with a call for unity among Western peoples based on shared values such as family and culture. | |