ds_i
stringlengths 829
14.8k
| ds_o
stringlengths 2
10
| prompt
stringlengths 2.37k
16.3k
|
|---|---|---|
Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: item 2 . properties . we conduct our primary operations at the owned and leased facilities described below . location operations conducted approximate square feet expiration new haven , connecticut corporate headquarters and executive , sales , research and development offices 514000 .
|location|operations conducted|approximatesquare feet|leaseexpirationdates|
|new haven connecticut|corporate headquarters and executive sales research and development offices|514000|2030|
|dublin ireland|global supply chain distribution and administration offices|215000|owned|
|lexington massachusetts|research and development offices|81000|2019|
|bogart georgia|commercial research and development manufacturing|70000|2024|
|smithfield rhode island|commercial research and development manufacturing|67000|owned|
|zurich switzerland|regional executive and sales offices|69000|2025|
we believe that our administrative office space is adequate to meet our needs for the foreseeable future . we also believe that our research and development facilities and our manufacturing facility , together with third party manufacturing facilities , will be adequate for our on-going activities . in addition to the locations above , we also lease space in other u.s . locations and in foreign countries to support our operations as a global organization . as of december 31 , 2015 , we also leased approximately 254000 square feet in cheshire , connecticut , which was the previous location of our corporate headquarters and executive , sales , research and development offices . in december 2015 , we entered into an early termination of this lease and will occupy this space through may 2016 . in april 2014 , we purchased a fill/finish facility in athlone , ireland . following refurbishment of the facility , and after successful completion of the appropriate validation processes and regulatory approvals , the facility will become our first company-owned fill/finish and packaging facility for our commercial and clinical products . in may 2015 , we announced plans to construct a new biologics manufacturing facility on our existing property in dublin ireland , which is expected to be completed by 2020 . item 3 . legal proceedings . in may 2015 , we received a subpoena in connection with an investigation by the enforcement division of the sec requesting information related to our grant-making activities and compliance with the fcpa in various countries . the sec also seeks information related to alexion 2019s recalls of specific lots of soliris and related securities disclosures . in addition , in october 2015 , alexion received a request from the doj for the voluntary production of documents and other information pertaining to alexion's compliance with the fcpa . alexion is cooperating with these investigations . at this time , alexion is unable to predict the duration , scope or outcome of these investigations . given the ongoing nature of these investigations , management does not currently believe a loss related to these matters is probable or that the potential magnitude of such loss or range of loss , if any , can be reasonably estimated . item 4 . mine safety disclosures . not applicable. .
Question: how many square feet are leased by alexion pharmaceuticals , inc? | 734000.0 | ### Transformed FinQA Question Generation Instructions
#### Step 1: Analyze and Understand the Original FinQA Question
- Objective: Use the given FinQA question to generate a new, logically similar but numerically different question.
- Guidelines:
- Identify the financial concepts and quantitative reasoning in the original question.
- Determine the key variables (e.g., revenue, profit, growth rate, interest) and their relationships.
- Maintain the original question’s structure and complexity.
#### Step 2: Transform and Adapt
- Objective: Create a new FinQA-style question while modifying numerical values and conditions.
- Guidelines:
- Change financial figures, constraints, or business conditions to create a unique question.
- Ensure the transformation maintains financial realism (e.g., realistic market trends, interest rates).
- Retain the original reasoning and computational steps while introducing fresh data points.
#### Step 3: Generate the New FinQA Question
- Objective: Output an original, transformed FinQA question without providing an answer or solution.
- Guidelines:
- Ensure the new question aligns with FinQA’s format and complexity.
- Maintain clarity and well-defined financial relationships.
### Response Rule
- **Generate only the "Transformed FinQA Question" for the given example without including any answer, explanation, or solution.**
### Output Format
#### Transformed FinQA Question: [Write your transformed FinQA question here.]
----
#### Task
#### Original FinQA Question: Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: item 2 . properties . we conduct our primary operations at the owned and leased facilities described below . location operations conducted approximate square feet expiration new haven , connecticut corporate headquarters and executive , sales , research and development offices 514000 .
|location|operations conducted|approximatesquare feet|leaseexpirationdates|
|new haven connecticut|corporate headquarters and executive sales research and development offices|514000|2030|
|dublin ireland|global supply chain distribution and administration offices|215000|owned|
|lexington massachusetts|research and development offices|81000|2019|
|bogart georgia|commercial research and development manufacturing|70000|2024|
|smithfield rhode island|commercial research and development manufacturing|67000|owned|
|zurich switzerland|regional executive and sales offices|69000|2025|
we believe that our administrative office space is adequate to meet our needs for the foreseeable future . we also believe that our research and development facilities and our manufacturing facility , together with third party manufacturing facilities , will be adequate for our on-going activities . in addition to the locations above , we also lease space in other u.s . locations and in foreign countries to support our operations as a global organization . as of december 31 , 2015 , we also leased approximately 254000 square feet in cheshire , connecticut , which was the previous location of our corporate headquarters and executive , sales , research and development offices . in december 2015 , we entered into an early termination of this lease and will occupy this space through may 2016 . in april 2014 , we purchased a fill/finish facility in athlone , ireland . following refurbishment of the facility , and after successful completion of the appropriate validation processes and regulatory approvals , the facility will become our first company-owned fill/finish and packaging facility for our commercial and clinical products . in may 2015 , we announced plans to construct a new biologics manufacturing facility on our existing property in dublin ireland , which is expected to be completed by 2020 . item 3 . legal proceedings . in may 2015 , we received a subpoena in connection with an investigation by the enforcement division of the sec requesting information related to our grant-making activities and compliance with the fcpa in various countries . the sec also seeks information related to alexion 2019s recalls of specific lots of soliris and related securities disclosures . in addition , in october 2015 , alexion received a request from the doj for the voluntary production of documents and other information pertaining to alexion's compliance with the fcpa . alexion is cooperating with these investigations . at this time , alexion is unable to predict the duration , scope or outcome of these investigations . given the ongoing nature of these investigations , management does not currently believe a loss related to these matters is probable or that the potential magnitude of such loss or range of loss , if any , can be reasonably estimated . item 4 . mine safety disclosures . not applicable. .
Question: how many square feet are leased by alexion pharmaceuticals , inc? |
Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: jpmorgan chase & co . / 2008 annual report 175jpmorgan chase & co . / 2008 annual report 175jpmorgan chase & co . / 2008 annual report 175jpmorgan chase & co . / 2008 annual report 175jpmorgan chase & co . / 2008 annual report 175 securities borrowed and securities lent are recorded at the amount of cash collateral advanced or received . securities borrowed consist primarily of government and equity securities . jpmorgan chase moni- tors the market value of the securities borrowed and lent on a daily basis and calls for additional collateral when appropriate . fees received or paid in connection with securities borrowed and lent are recorded in interest income or interest expense . the following table details the components of collateralized financings. .
|december 31 ( in millions )|2008|2007|
|securities purchased under resale agreements ( a )|$ 200265|$ 169305|
|securities borrowed ( b )|124000|84184|
|securities sold under repurchase agreements ( c )|$ 174456|$ 126098|
|securities loaned|6077|10922|
( a ) includes resale agreements of $ 20.8 billion and $ 19.1 billion accounted for at fair value at december 31 , 2008 and 2007 , respectively . ( b ) includes securities borrowed of $ 3.4 billion accounted for at fair value at december 31 , 2008 . ( c ) includes repurchase agreements of $ 3.0 billion and $ 5.8 billion accounted for at fair value at december 31 , 2008 and 2007 , respectively . jpmorgan chase pledges certain financial instruments it owns to col- lateralize repurchase agreements and other securities financings . pledged securities that can be sold or repledged by the secured party are identified as financial instruments owned ( pledged to various parties ) on the consolidated balance sheets . at december 31 , 2008 , the firm received securities as collateral that could be repledged , delivered or otherwise used with a fair value of approximately $ 511.9 billion . this collateral was generally obtained under resale or securities borrowing agreements . of these securities , approximately $ 456.6 billion were repledged , delivered or otherwise used , generally as collateral under repurchase agreements , securities lending agreements or to cover short sales . note 14 2013 loans the accounting for a loan may differ based upon whether it is origi- nated or purchased and as to whether the loan is used in an invest- ing or trading strategy . for purchased loans held-for-investment , the accounting also differs depending on whether a loan is credit- impaired at the date of acquisition . purchased loans with evidence of credit deterioration since the origination date and for which it is probable , at acquisition , that all contractually required payments receivable will not be collected are considered to be credit-impaired . the measurement framework for loans in the consolidated financial statements is one of the following : 2022 at the principal amount outstanding , net of the allowance for loan losses , unearned income and any net deferred loan fees or costs , for loans held for investment ( other than purchased credit- impaired loans ) ; 2022 at the lower of cost or fair value , with valuation changes record- ed in noninterest revenue , for loans that are classified as held- for-sale ; or 2022 at fair value , with changes in fair value recorded in noninterest revenue , for loans classified as trading assets or risk managed on a fair value basis ; 2022 purchased credit-impaired loans held for investment are account- ed for under sop 03-3 and initially measured at fair value , which includes estimated future credit losses . accordingly , an allowance for loan losses related to these loans is not recorded at the acquisition date . see note 5 on pages 156 2013158 of this annual report for further information on the firm 2019s elections of fair value accounting under sfas 159 . see note 6 on pages 158 2013160 of this annual report for further information on loans carried at fair value and classified as trading assets . for loans held for investment , other than purchased credit-impaired loans , interest income is recognized using the interest method or on a basis approximating a level rate of return over the term of the loan . loans within the held-for-investment portfolio that management decides to sell are transferred to the held-for-sale portfolio . transfers to held-for-sale are recorded at the lower of cost or fair value on the date of transfer . credit-related losses are charged off to the allowance for loan losses and losses due to changes in interest rates , or exchange rates , are recognized in noninterest revenue . loans within the held-for-sale portfolio that management decides to retain are transferred to the held-for-investment portfolio at the lower of cost or fair value . these loans are subsequently assessed for impairment based on the firm 2019s allowance methodology . for a fur- ther discussion of the methodologies used in establishing the firm 2019s allowance for loan losses , see note 15 on pages 178 2013180 of this annual report . nonaccrual loans are those on which the accrual of interest is dis- continued . loans ( other than certain consumer and purchased credit- impaired loans discussed below ) are placed on nonaccrual status immediately if , in the opinion of management , full payment of princi- pal or interest is in doubt , or when principal or interest is 90 days or more past due and collateral , if any , is insufficient to cover principal and interest . loans are charged off to the allowance for loan losses when it is highly certain that a loss has been realized . interest accrued but not collected at the date a loan is placed on nonaccrual status is reversed against interest income . in addition , the amortiza- tion of net deferred loan fees is suspended . interest income on nonaccrual loans is recognized only to the extent it is received in cash . however , where there is doubt regarding the ultimate col- lectibility of loan principal , all cash thereafter received is applied to reduce the carrying value of such loans ( i.e. , the cost recovery method ) . loans are restored to accrual status only when future pay- ments of interest and principal are reasonably assured . consumer loans , other than purchased credit-impaired loans , are generally charged to the allowance for loan losses upon reaching specified stages of delinquency , in accordance with the federal financial institutions examination council policy . for example , credit card loans are charged off by the end of the month in which the account becomes 180 days past due or within 60 days from receiv- ing notification of the filing of bankruptcy , whichever is earlier . residential mortgage products are generally charged off to net real- izable value at no later than 180 days past due . other consumer .
Question: what was the ratio of the securities borrowed to the securities loaned in 2008 | 20.40481 | ### Transformed FinQA Question Generation Instructions
#### Step 1: Analyze and Understand the Original FinQA Question
- Objective: Use the given FinQA question to generate a new, logically similar but numerically different question.
- Guidelines:
- Identify the financial concepts and quantitative reasoning in the original question.
- Determine the key variables (e.g., revenue, profit, growth rate, interest) and their relationships.
- Maintain the original question’s structure and complexity.
#### Step 2: Transform and Adapt
- Objective: Create a new FinQA-style question while modifying numerical values and conditions.
- Guidelines:
- Change financial figures, constraints, or business conditions to create a unique question.
- Ensure the transformation maintains financial realism (e.g., realistic market trends, interest rates).
- Retain the original reasoning and computational steps while introducing fresh data points.
#### Step 3: Generate the New FinQA Question
- Objective: Output an original, transformed FinQA question without providing an answer or solution.
- Guidelines:
- Ensure the new question aligns with FinQA’s format and complexity.
- Maintain clarity and well-defined financial relationships.
### Response Rule
- **Generate only the "Transformed FinQA Question" for the given example without including any answer, explanation, or solution.**
### Output Format
#### Transformed FinQA Question: [Write your transformed FinQA question here.]
----
#### Task
#### Original FinQA Question: Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: jpmorgan chase & co . / 2008 annual report 175jpmorgan chase & co . / 2008 annual report 175jpmorgan chase & co . / 2008 annual report 175jpmorgan chase & co . / 2008 annual report 175jpmorgan chase & co . / 2008 annual report 175 securities borrowed and securities lent are recorded at the amount of cash collateral advanced or received . securities borrowed consist primarily of government and equity securities . jpmorgan chase moni- tors the market value of the securities borrowed and lent on a daily basis and calls for additional collateral when appropriate . fees received or paid in connection with securities borrowed and lent are recorded in interest income or interest expense . the following table details the components of collateralized financings. .
|december 31 ( in millions )|2008|2007|
|securities purchased under resale agreements ( a )|$ 200265|$ 169305|
|securities borrowed ( b )|124000|84184|
|securities sold under repurchase agreements ( c )|$ 174456|$ 126098|
|securities loaned|6077|10922|
( a ) includes resale agreements of $ 20.8 billion and $ 19.1 billion accounted for at fair value at december 31 , 2008 and 2007 , respectively . ( b ) includes securities borrowed of $ 3.4 billion accounted for at fair value at december 31 , 2008 . ( c ) includes repurchase agreements of $ 3.0 billion and $ 5.8 billion accounted for at fair value at december 31 , 2008 and 2007 , respectively . jpmorgan chase pledges certain financial instruments it owns to col- lateralize repurchase agreements and other securities financings . pledged securities that can be sold or repledged by the secured party are identified as financial instruments owned ( pledged to various parties ) on the consolidated balance sheets . at december 31 , 2008 , the firm received securities as collateral that could be repledged , delivered or otherwise used with a fair value of approximately $ 511.9 billion . this collateral was generally obtained under resale or securities borrowing agreements . of these securities , approximately $ 456.6 billion were repledged , delivered or otherwise used , generally as collateral under repurchase agreements , securities lending agreements or to cover short sales . note 14 2013 loans the accounting for a loan may differ based upon whether it is origi- nated or purchased and as to whether the loan is used in an invest- ing or trading strategy . for purchased loans held-for-investment , the accounting also differs depending on whether a loan is credit- impaired at the date of acquisition . purchased loans with evidence of credit deterioration since the origination date and for which it is probable , at acquisition , that all contractually required payments receivable will not be collected are considered to be credit-impaired . the measurement framework for loans in the consolidated financial statements is one of the following : 2022 at the principal amount outstanding , net of the allowance for loan losses , unearned income and any net deferred loan fees or costs , for loans held for investment ( other than purchased credit- impaired loans ) ; 2022 at the lower of cost or fair value , with valuation changes record- ed in noninterest revenue , for loans that are classified as held- for-sale ; or 2022 at fair value , with changes in fair value recorded in noninterest revenue , for loans classified as trading assets or risk managed on a fair value basis ; 2022 purchased credit-impaired loans held for investment are account- ed for under sop 03-3 and initially measured at fair value , which includes estimated future credit losses . accordingly , an allowance for loan losses related to these loans is not recorded at the acquisition date . see note 5 on pages 156 2013158 of this annual report for further information on the firm 2019s elections of fair value accounting under sfas 159 . see note 6 on pages 158 2013160 of this annual report for further information on loans carried at fair value and classified as trading assets . for loans held for investment , other than purchased credit-impaired loans , interest income is recognized using the interest method or on a basis approximating a level rate of return over the term of the loan . loans within the held-for-investment portfolio that management decides to sell are transferred to the held-for-sale portfolio . transfers to held-for-sale are recorded at the lower of cost or fair value on the date of transfer . credit-related losses are charged off to the allowance for loan losses and losses due to changes in interest rates , or exchange rates , are recognized in noninterest revenue . loans within the held-for-sale portfolio that management decides to retain are transferred to the held-for-investment portfolio at the lower of cost or fair value . these loans are subsequently assessed for impairment based on the firm 2019s allowance methodology . for a fur- ther discussion of the methodologies used in establishing the firm 2019s allowance for loan losses , see note 15 on pages 178 2013180 of this annual report . nonaccrual loans are those on which the accrual of interest is dis- continued . loans ( other than certain consumer and purchased credit- impaired loans discussed below ) are placed on nonaccrual status immediately if , in the opinion of management , full payment of princi- pal or interest is in doubt , or when principal or interest is 90 days or more past due and collateral , if any , is insufficient to cover principal and interest . loans are charged off to the allowance for loan losses when it is highly certain that a loss has been realized . interest accrued but not collected at the date a loan is placed on nonaccrual status is reversed against interest income . in addition , the amortiza- tion of net deferred loan fees is suspended . interest income on nonaccrual loans is recognized only to the extent it is received in cash . however , where there is doubt regarding the ultimate col- lectibility of loan principal , all cash thereafter received is applied to reduce the carrying value of such loans ( i.e. , the cost recovery method ) . loans are restored to accrual status only when future pay- ments of interest and principal are reasonably assured . consumer loans , other than purchased credit-impaired loans , are generally charged to the allowance for loan losses upon reaching specified stages of delinquency , in accordance with the federal financial institutions examination council policy . for example , credit card loans are charged off by the end of the month in which the account becomes 180 days past due or within 60 days from receiv- ing notification of the filing of bankruptcy , whichever is earlier . residential mortgage products are generally charged off to net real- izable value at no later than 180 days past due . other consumer .
Question: what was the ratio of the securities borrowed to the securities loaned in 2008 |
Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: management 2019s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations 2013 ( continued ) ( amounts in millions , except per share amounts ) net cash used in investing activities during 2013 primarily related to payments for capital expenditures and acquisitions . capital expenditures of $ 173.0 related primarily to computer hardware and software and leasehold improvements . we made payments of $ 61.5 related to acquisitions completed during 2013 , net of cash acquired . financing activities net cash used in financing activities during 2014 primarily related to the purchase of long-term debt , the repurchase of our common stock and payment of dividends . during 2014 , we redeemed all $ 350.0 in aggregate principal amount of the 6.25% ( 6.25 % ) notes , repurchased 14.9 shares of our common stock for an aggregate cost of $ 275.1 , including fees , and made dividend payments of $ 159.0 on our common stock . this was offset by the issuance of $ 500.0 in aggregate principal amount of our 4.20% ( 4.20 % ) notes . net cash used in financing activities during 2013 primarily related to the purchase of long-term debt , the repurchase of our common stock and payment of dividends . we redeemed all $ 600.0 in aggregate principal amount of our 10.00% ( 10.00 % ) notes . in addition , we repurchased 31.8 shares of our common stock for an aggregate cost of $ 481.8 , including fees , and made dividend payments of $ 126.0 on our common stock . foreign exchange rate changes the effect of foreign exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents included in the consolidated statements of cash flows resulted in a decrease of $ 101.0 in 2014 . the decrease was primarily a result of the u.s . dollar being stronger than several foreign currencies , including the canadian dollar , brazilian real , australian dollar and the euro as of december 31 , 2014 compared to december 31 , 2013 . the effect of foreign exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents included in the consolidated statements of cash flows resulted in a decrease of $ 94.1 in 2013 . the decrease was primarily a result of the u.s . dollar being stronger than several foreign currencies , including the australian dollar , brazilian real , canadian dollar , japanese yen , and south african rand as of december 31 , 2013 compared to december 31 , 2012. .
|balance sheet data|december 31 , 2014|december 31 , 2013|
|cash cash equivalents and marketable securities|$ 1667.2|$ 1642.1|
|short-term borrowings|$ 107.2|$ 179.1|
|current portion of long-term debt|2.1|353.6|
|long-term debt|1623.5|1129.8|
|total debt|$ 1732.8|$ 1662.5|
liquidity outlook we expect our cash flow from operations , cash and cash equivalents to be sufficient to meet our anticipated operating requirements at a minimum for the next twelve months . we also have a committed corporate credit facility as well as uncommitted facilities available to support our operating needs . we continue to maintain a disciplined approach to managing liquidity , with flexibility over significant uses of cash , including our capital expenditures , cash used for new acquisitions , our common stock repurchase program and our common stock dividends . from time to time , we evaluate market conditions and financing alternatives for opportunities to raise additional funds or otherwise improve our liquidity profile , enhance our financial flexibility and manage market risk . our ability to access the capital markets depends on a number of factors , which include those specific to us , such as our credit rating , and those related to the financial markets , such as the amount or terms of available credit . there can be no guarantee that we would be able to access new sources of liquidity on commercially reasonable terms , or at all. .
Question: what was the average of short-term borrowings in 2013-2014? | 143.15 | ### Transformed FinQA Question Generation Instructions
#### Step 1: Analyze and Understand the Original FinQA Question
- Objective: Use the given FinQA question to generate a new, logically similar but numerically different question.
- Guidelines:
- Identify the financial concepts and quantitative reasoning in the original question.
- Determine the key variables (e.g., revenue, profit, growth rate, interest) and their relationships.
- Maintain the original question’s structure and complexity.
#### Step 2: Transform and Adapt
- Objective: Create a new FinQA-style question while modifying numerical values and conditions.
- Guidelines:
- Change financial figures, constraints, or business conditions to create a unique question.
- Ensure the transformation maintains financial realism (e.g., realistic market trends, interest rates).
- Retain the original reasoning and computational steps while introducing fresh data points.
#### Step 3: Generate the New FinQA Question
- Objective: Output an original, transformed FinQA question without providing an answer or solution.
- Guidelines:
- Ensure the new question aligns with FinQA’s format and complexity.
- Maintain clarity and well-defined financial relationships.
### Response Rule
- **Generate only the "Transformed FinQA Question" for the given example without including any answer, explanation, or solution.**
### Output Format
#### Transformed FinQA Question: [Write your transformed FinQA question here.]
----
#### Task
#### Original FinQA Question: Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: management 2019s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations 2013 ( continued ) ( amounts in millions , except per share amounts ) net cash used in investing activities during 2013 primarily related to payments for capital expenditures and acquisitions . capital expenditures of $ 173.0 related primarily to computer hardware and software and leasehold improvements . we made payments of $ 61.5 related to acquisitions completed during 2013 , net of cash acquired . financing activities net cash used in financing activities during 2014 primarily related to the purchase of long-term debt , the repurchase of our common stock and payment of dividends . during 2014 , we redeemed all $ 350.0 in aggregate principal amount of the 6.25% ( 6.25 % ) notes , repurchased 14.9 shares of our common stock for an aggregate cost of $ 275.1 , including fees , and made dividend payments of $ 159.0 on our common stock . this was offset by the issuance of $ 500.0 in aggregate principal amount of our 4.20% ( 4.20 % ) notes . net cash used in financing activities during 2013 primarily related to the purchase of long-term debt , the repurchase of our common stock and payment of dividends . we redeemed all $ 600.0 in aggregate principal amount of our 10.00% ( 10.00 % ) notes . in addition , we repurchased 31.8 shares of our common stock for an aggregate cost of $ 481.8 , including fees , and made dividend payments of $ 126.0 on our common stock . foreign exchange rate changes the effect of foreign exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents included in the consolidated statements of cash flows resulted in a decrease of $ 101.0 in 2014 . the decrease was primarily a result of the u.s . dollar being stronger than several foreign currencies , including the canadian dollar , brazilian real , australian dollar and the euro as of december 31 , 2014 compared to december 31 , 2013 . the effect of foreign exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents included in the consolidated statements of cash flows resulted in a decrease of $ 94.1 in 2013 . the decrease was primarily a result of the u.s . dollar being stronger than several foreign currencies , including the australian dollar , brazilian real , canadian dollar , japanese yen , and south african rand as of december 31 , 2013 compared to december 31 , 2012. .
|balance sheet data|december 31 , 2014|december 31 , 2013|
|cash cash equivalents and marketable securities|$ 1667.2|$ 1642.1|
|short-term borrowings|$ 107.2|$ 179.1|
|current portion of long-term debt|2.1|353.6|
|long-term debt|1623.5|1129.8|
|total debt|$ 1732.8|$ 1662.5|
liquidity outlook we expect our cash flow from operations , cash and cash equivalents to be sufficient to meet our anticipated operating requirements at a minimum for the next twelve months . we also have a committed corporate credit facility as well as uncommitted facilities available to support our operating needs . we continue to maintain a disciplined approach to managing liquidity , with flexibility over significant uses of cash , including our capital expenditures , cash used for new acquisitions , our common stock repurchase program and our common stock dividends . from time to time , we evaluate market conditions and financing alternatives for opportunities to raise additional funds or otherwise improve our liquidity profile , enhance our financial flexibility and manage market risk . our ability to access the capital markets depends on a number of factors , which include those specific to us , such as our credit rating , and those related to the financial markets , such as the amount or terms of available credit . there can be no guarantee that we would be able to access new sources of liquidity on commercially reasonable terms , or at all. .
Question: what was the average of short-term borrowings in 2013-2014? |
Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: american tower corporation and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements ( 3 ) consists of customer-related intangibles of approximately $ 75.0 million and network location intangibles of approximately $ 72.7 million . the customer-related intangibles and network location intangibles are being amortized on a straight-line basis over periods of up to 20 years . ( 4 ) the company expects that the goodwill recorded will be deductible for tax purposes . the goodwill was allocated to the company 2019s international rental and management segment . on september 12 , 2012 , the company entered into a definitive agreement to purchase up to approximately 348 additional communications sites from telef f3nica mexico . on september 27 , 2012 and december 14 , 2012 , the company completed the purchase of 279 and 2 communications sites , for an aggregate purchase price of $ 63.5 million ( including value added tax of $ 8.8 million ) . the following table summarizes the preliminary allocation of the aggregate purchase consideration paid and the amounts of assets acquired and liabilities assumed based upon their estimated fair value at the date of acquisition ( in thousands ) : preliminary purchase price allocation .
||preliminary purchase price allocation|
|current assets|$ 8763|
|non-current assets|2332|
|property and equipment|26711|
|intangible assets ( 1 )|21079|
|other non-current liabilities|-1349 ( 1349 )|
|fair value of net assets acquired|$ 57536|
|goodwill ( 2 )|5998|
( 1 ) consists of customer-related intangibles of approximately $ 10.7 million and network location intangibles of approximately $ 10.4 million . the customer-related intangibles and network location intangibles are being amortized on a straight-line basis over periods of up to 20 years . ( 2 ) the company expects that the goodwill recorded will be deductible for tax purposes . the goodwill was allocated to the company 2019s international rental and management segment . on november 16 , 2012 , the company entered into an agreement to purchase up to 198 additional communications sites from telef f3nica mexico . on december 14 , 2012 , the company completed the purchase of 188 communications sites , for an aggregate purchase price of $ 64.2 million ( including value added tax of $ 8.9 million ) . .
Question: for acquired customer-related and network location intangibles , what is the expected annual amortization expenses , in millions? | 7.385 | ### Transformed FinQA Question Generation Instructions
#### Step 1: Analyze and Understand the Original FinQA Question
- Objective: Use the given FinQA question to generate a new, logically similar but numerically different question.
- Guidelines:
- Identify the financial concepts and quantitative reasoning in the original question.
- Determine the key variables (e.g., revenue, profit, growth rate, interest) and their relationships.
- Maintain the original question’s structure and complexity.
#### Step 2: Transform and Adapt
- Objective: Create a new FinQA-style question while modifying numerical values and conditions.
- Guidelines:
- Change financial figures, constraints, or business conditions to create a unique question.
- Ensure the transformation maintains financial realism (e.g., realistic market trends, interest rates).
- Retain the original reasoning and computational steps while introducing fresh data points.
#### Step 3: Generate the New FinQA Question
- Objective: Output an original, transformed FinQA question without providing an answer or solution.
- Guidelines:
- Ensure the new question aligns with FinQA’s format and complexity.
- Maintain clarity and well-defined financial relationships.
### Response Rule
- **Generate only the "Transformed FinQA Question" for the given example without including any answer, explanation, or solution.**
### Output Format
#### Transformed FinQA Question: [Write your transformed FinQA question here.]
----
#### Task
#### Original FinQA Question: Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: american tower corporation and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements ( 3 ) consists of customer-related intangibles of approximately $ 75.0 million and network location intangibles of approximately $ 72.7 million . the customer-related intangibles and network location intangibles are being amortized on a straight-line basis over periods of up to 20 years . ( 4 ) the company expects that the goodwill recorded will be deductible for tax purposes . the goodwill was allocated to the company 2019s international rental and management segment . on september 12 , 2012 , the company entered into a definitive agreement to purchase up to approximately 348 additional communications sites from telef f3nica mexico . on september 27 , 2012 and december 14 , 2012 , the company completed the purchase of 279 and 2 communications sites , for an aggregate purchase price of $ 63.5 million ( including value added tax of $ 8.8 million ) . the following table summarizes the preliminary allocation of the aggregate purchase consideration paid and the amounts of assets acquired and liabilities assumed based upon their estimated fair value at the date of acquisition ( in thousands ) : preliminary purchase price allocation .
||preliminary purchase price allocation|
|current assets|$ 8763|
|non-current assets|2332|
|property and equipment|26711|
|intangible assets ( 1 )|21079|
|other non-current liabilities|-1349 ( 1349 )|
|fair value of net assets acquired|$ 57536|
|goodwill ( 2 )|5998|
( 1 ) consists of customer-related intangibles of approximately $ 10.7 million and network location intangibles of approximately $ 10.4 million . the customer-related intangibles and network location intangibles are being amortized on a straight-line basis over periods of up to 20 years . ( 2 ) the company expects that the goodwill recorded will be deductible for tax purposes . the goodwill was allocated to the company 2019s international rental and management segment . on november 16 , 2012 , the company entered into an agreement to purchase up to 198 additional communications sites from telef f3nica mexico . on december 14 , 2012 , the company completed the purchase of 188 communications sites , for an aggregate purchase price of $ 64.2 million ( including value added tax of $ 8.9 million ) . .
Question: for acquired customer-related and network location intangibles , what is the expected annual amortization expenses , in millions? |
Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: the aggregate changes in the balance of gross unrecognized tax benefits , which excludes interest and penalties , for 2012 , 2011 , and 2010 , is as follows ( in millions ) : .
||2012|2011|2010|
|beginning balance|$ 1375|$ 943|$ 971|
|increases related to tax positions taken during a prior year|340|49|61|
|decreases related to tax positions taken during a prior year|-107 ( 107 )|-39 ( 39 )|-224 ( 224 )|
|increases related to tax positions taken during the current year|467|425|240|
|decreases related to settlements with taxing authorities|-3 ( 3 )|0|-102 ( 102 )|
|decreases related to expiration of statute of limitations|-10 ( 10 )|-3 ( 3 )|-3 ( 3 )|
|ending balance|$ 2062|$ 1375|$ 943|
the company includes interest and penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits within the provision for income taxes . as of september 29 , 2012 and september 24 , 2011 , the total amount of gross interest and penalties accrued was $ 401 million and $ 261 million , respectively , which is classified as non-current liabilities in the consolidated balance sheets . in connection with tax matters , the company recognized interest expense in 2012 and 2011 of $ 140 million and $ 14 million , respectively , and in 2010 the company recognized an interest benefit of $ 43 million . the company is subject to taxation and files income tax returns in the u.s . federal jurisdiction and in many state and foreign jurisdictions . for u.s . federal income tax purposes , all years prior to 2004 are closed . the internal revenue service ( the 201cirs 201d ) has completed its field audit of the company 2019s federal income tax returns for the years 2004 through 2006 and proposed certain adjustments . the company has contested certain of these adjustments through the irs appeals office . the irs is currently examining the years 2007 through 2009 . in addition , the company is also subject to audits by state , local and foreign tax authorities . in major states and major foreign jurisdictions , the years subsequent to 1989 and 2002 , respectively , generally remain open and could be subject to examination by the taxing authorities . management believes that an adequate provision has been made for any adjustments that may result from tax examinations . however , the outcome of tax audits cannot be predicted with certainty . if any issues addressed in the company 2019s tax audits are resolved in a manner not consistent with management 2019s expectations , the company could be required to adjust its provision for income tax in the period such resolution occurs . although timing of the resolution and/or closure of audits is not certain , the company believes it is reasonably possible that tax audit resolutions could reduce its unrecognized tax benefits by between $ 120 million and $ 170 million in the next 12 months . note 6 2013 shareholders 2019 equity and share-based compensation preferred stock the company has five million shares of authorized preferred stock , none of which is issued or outstanding . under the terms of the company 2019s restated articles of incorporation , the board of directors is authorized to determine or alter the rights , preferences , privileges and restrictions of the company 2019s authorized but unissued shares of preferred stock . dividend and stock repurchase program in 2012 , the board of directors of the company approved a dividend policy pursuant to which it plans to make , subject to subsequent declaration , quarterly dividends of $ 2.65 per share . on july 24 , 2012 , the board of directors declared a dividend of $ 2.65 per share to shareholders of record as of the close of business on august 13 , 2012 . the company paid $ 2.5 billion in conjunction with this dividend on august 16 , 2012 . no dividends were declared in the first three quarters of 2012 or in 2011 and 2010. .
Question: what was the aggregate change in the ending balance of gross unrecognized tax benefits , which excludes interest and penalties between 2012 and 2011? | 687.0 | ### Transformed FinQA Question Generation Instructions
#### Step 1: Analyze and Understand the Original FinQA Question
- Objective: Use the given FinQA question to generate a new, logically similar but numerically different question.
- Guidelines:
- Identify the financial concepts and quantitative reasoning in the original question.
- Determine the key variables (e.g., revenue, profit, growth rate, interest) and their relationships.
- Maintain the original question’s structure and complexity.
#### Step 2: Transform and Adapt
- Objective: Create a new FinQA-style question while modifying numerical values and conditions.
- Guidelines:
- Change financial figures, constraints, or business conditions to create a unique question.
- Ensure the transformation maintains financial realism (e.g., realistic market trends, interest rates).
- Retain the original reasoning and computational steps while introducing fresh data points.
#### Step 3: Generate the New FinQA Question
- Objective: Output an original, transformed FinQA question without providing an answer or solution.
- Guidelines:
- Ensure the new question aligns with FinQA’s format and complexity.
- Maintain clarity and well-defined financial relationships.
### Response Rule
- **Generate only the "Transformed FinQA Question" for the given example without including any answer, explanation, or solution.**
### Output Format
#### Transformed FinQA Question: [Write your transformed FinQA question here.]
----
#### Task
#### Original FinQA Question: Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: the aggregate changes in the balance of gross unrecognized tax benefits , which excludes interest and penalties , for 2012 , 2011 , and 2010 , is as follows ( in millions ) : .
||2012|2011|2010|
|beginning balance|$ 1375|$ 943|$ 971|
|increases related to tax positions taken during a prior year|340|49|61|
|decreases related to tax positions taken during a prior year|-107 ( 107 )|-39 ( 39 )|-224 ( 224 )|
|increases related to tax positions taken during the current year|467|425|240|
|decreases related to settlements with taxing authorities|-3 ( 3 )|0|-102 ( 102 )|
|decreases related to expiration of statute of limitations|-10 ( 10 )|-3 ( 3 )|-3 ( 3 )|
|ending balance|$ 2062|$ 1375|$ 943|
the company includes interest and penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits within the provision for income taxes . as of september 29 , 2012 and september 24 , 2011 , the total amount of gross interest and penalties accrued was $ 401 million and $ 261 million , respectively , which is classified as non-current liabilities in the consolidated balance sheets . in connection with tax matters , the company recognized interest expense in 2012 and 2011 of $ 140 million and $ 14 million , respectively , and in 2010 the company recognized an interest benefit of $ 43 million . the company is subject to taxation and files income tax returns in the u.s . federal jurisdiction and in many state and foreign jurisdictions . for u.s . federal income tax purposes , all years prior to 2004 are closed . the internal revenue service ( the 201cirs 201d ) has completed its field audit of the company 2019s federal income tax returns for the years 2004 through 2006 and proposed certain adjustments . the company has contested certain of these adjustments through the irs appeals office . the irs is currently examining the years 2007 through 2009 . in addition , the company is also subject to audits by state , local and foreign tax authorities . in major states and major foreign jurisdictions , the years subsequent to 1989 and 2002 , respectively , generally remain open and could be subject to examination by the taxing authorities . management believes that an adequate provision has been made for any adjustments that may result from tax examinations . however , the outcome of tax audits cannot be predicted with certainty . if any issues addressed in the company 2019s tax audits are resolved in a manner not consistent with management 2019s expectations , the company could be required to adjust its provision for income tax in the period such resolution occurs . although timing of the resolution and/or closure of audits is not certain , the company believes it is reasonably possible that tax audit resolutions could reduce its unrecognized tax benefits by between $ 120 million and $ 170 million in the next 12 months . note 6 2013 shareholders 2019 equity and share-based compensation preferred stock the company has five million shares of authorized preferred stock , none of which is issued or outstanding . under the terms of the company 2019s restated articles of incorporation , the board of directors is authorized to determine or alter the rights , preferences , privileges and restrictions of the company 2019s authorized but unissued shares of preferred stock . dividend and stock repurchase program in 2012 , the board of directors of the company approved a dividend policy pursuant to which it plans to make , subject to subsequent declaration , quarterly dividends of $ 2.65 per share . on july 24 , 2012 , the board of directors declared a dividend of $ 2.65 per share to shareholders of record as of the close of business on august 13 , 2012 . the company paid $ 2.5 billion in conjunction with this dividend on august 16 , 2012 . no dividends were declared in the first three quarters of 2012 or in 2011 and 2010. .
Question: what was the aggregate change in the ending balance of gross unrecognized tax benefits , which excludes interest and penalties between 2012 and 2011? |
Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: 7 . derivative instruments effective january 1 , 2001 , aes adopted sfas no . 133 , 2018 2018accounting for derivative instruments and hedging activities , 2019 2019 which , as amended , establishes accounting and reporting standards for derivative instruments and hedging activities . the adoption of sfas no . 133 on january 1 , 2001 , resulted in a cumulative reduction to income of less than $ 1 million , net of deferred income tax effects , and a cumulative reduction of accumulated other comprehensive income in stockholders 2019 equity of $ 93 million , net of deferred income tax effects . for the year ended december 31 , 2001 , the impact of changes in derivative fair value primarily related to derivatives that do not qualify for hedge accounting treatment was a charge of $ 36 million , after income taxes . this amount includes a charge of $ 6 million , after income taxes , related to the ineffective portion of derivatives qualifying as cash flow and fair value hedges for the year ended december 31 , 2001 . there was no net effect on results of operations for the year ended december 31 , 2001 , of derivative and non-derivative instruments that have been designated and qualified as hedging net investments in foreign operations . approximately $ 35 million of other comprehensive loss related to derivative instruments as of december 31 , 2001 is expected to be recognized as a reduction to earnings over the next twelve months . a portion of this amount is expected to be offset by the effects of hedge accounting . the balance in accumulated other comprehensive loss related to derivative transactions will be reclassified into earnings as interest expense is recognized for hedges of interest rate risk , as foreign currency transaction and translation gains and losses are recognized for hedges of foreign currency exposure and as electric and gas sales and purchases are recognized for hedges of forecasted electric and gas transactions . amounts recorded in accumulated other comprehensive income , net of tax , during the year-ended december 31 , 2001 , were as follows ( in millions ) : .
|transition adjustment on january 1 2001|$ -93 ( 93 )|
|reclassification to earnings|-32 ( 32 )|
|change in fair value|4|
|balance december 31 2001|$ -121 ( 121 )|
aes utilizes derivative financial instruments to hedge interest rate risk , foreign exchange risk and commodity price risk . the company utilizes interest rate swap , cap and floor agreements to hedge interest rate risk on floating rate debt . the majority of aes 2019s interest rate derivatives are designated and qualify as cash flow hedges . currency forward and swap agreements are utilized to hedge foreign exchange risk which is a result of aes or one of its subsidiaries entering into monetary obligations in currencies other than its own functional currency . the majority of aes 2019s foreign currency derivatives are designated and qualify as either fair value hedges or cash flow hedges . certain derivative instruments and other non-derivative instruments are designated and qualify as hedges of the foreign currency exposure of a net investment in a foreign operation . the company utilizes electric and gas derivative instruments , including swaps , options , forwards and futures , to hedge the risk related to electricity and gas sales and purchases . the majority of aes 2019s electric and gas derivatives are designated and qualify as cash flow hedges . the maximum length of time over which aes is hedging its exposure to variability in future cash flows for forecasted transactions , excluding forecasted transactions related to the payment of variable interest , is three years . for the year ended december 31 , 2001 , a charge of $ 4 million , after income taxes , was recorded for two cash flow hedges that were discontinued because it is probable that the hedged forecasted transaction will not occur . a portion of this charge has been classified as discontinued operations . for the year ended december 31 , 2001 , no fair value hedges were de-recognized or discontinued. .
Question: for 2001 what was the net change in aoci in millions?\\n | 28.0 | ### Transformed FinQA Question Generation Instructions
#### Step 1: Analyze and Understand the Original FinQA Question
- Objective: Use the given FinQA question to generate a new, logically similar but numerically different question.
- Guidelines:
- Identify the financial concepts and quantitative reasoning in the original question.
- Determine the key variables (e.g., revenue, profit, growth rate, interest) and their relationships.
- Maintain the original question’s structure and complexity.
#### Step 2: Transform and Adapt
- Objective: Create a new FinQA-style question while modifying numerical values and conditions.
- Guidelines:
- Change financial figures, constraints, or business conditions to create a unique question.
- Ensure the transformation maintains financial realism (e.g., realistic market trends, interest rates).
- Retain the original reasoning and computational steps while introducing fresh data points.
#### Step 3: Generate the New FinQA Question
- Objective: Output an original, transformed FinQA question without providing an answer or solution.
- Guidelines:
- Ensure the new question aligns with FinQA’s format and complexity.
- Maintain clarity and well-defined financial relationships.
### Response Rule
- **Generate only the "Transformed FinQA Question" for the given example without including any answer, explanation, or solution.**
### Output Format
#### Transformed FinQA Question: [Write your transformed FinQA question here.]
----
#### Task
#### Original FinQA Question: Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: 7 . derivative instruments effective january 1 , 2001 , aes adopted sfas no . 133 , 2018 2018accounting for derivative instruments and hedging activities , 2019 2019 which , as amended , establishes accounting and reporting standards for derivative instruments and hedging activities . the adoption of sfas no . 133 on january 1 , 2001 , resulted in a cumulative reduction to income of less than $ 1 million , net of deferred income tax effects , and a cumulative reduction of accumulated other comprehensive income in stockholders 2019 equity of $ 93 million , net of deferred income tax effects . for the year ended december 31 , 2001 , the impact of changes in derivative fair value primarily related to derivatives that do not qualify for hedge accounting treatment was a charge of $ 36 million , after income taxes . this amount includes a charge of $ 6 million , after income taxes , related to the ineffective portion of derivatives qualifying as cash flow and fair value hedges for the year ended december 31 , 2001 . there was no net effect on results of operations for the year ended december 31 , 2001 , of derivative and non-derivative instruments that have been designated and qualified as hedging net investments in foreign operations . approximately $ 35 million of other comprehensive loss related to derivative instruments as of december 31 , 2001 is expected to be recognized as a reduction to earnings over the next twelve months . a portion of this amount is expected to be offset by the effects of hedge accounting . the balance in accumulated other comprehensive loss related to derivative transactions will be reclassified into earnings as interest expense is recognized for hedges of interest rate risk , as foreign currency transaction and translation gains and losses are recognized for hedges of foreign currency exposure and as electric and gas sales and purchases are recognized for hedges of forecasted electric and gas transactions . amounts recorded in accumulated other comprehensive income , net of tax , during the year-ended december 31 , 2001 , were as follows ( in millions ) : .
|transition adjustment on january 1 2001|$ -93 ( 93 )|
|reclassification to earnings|-32 ( 32 )|
|change in fair value|4|
|balance december 31 2001|$ -121 ( 121 )|
aes utilizes derivative financial instruments to hedge interest rate risk , foreign exchange risk and commodity price risk . the company utilizes interest rate swap , cap and floor agreements to hedge interest rate risk on floating rate debt . the majority of aes 2019s interest rate derivatives are designated and qualify as cash flow hedges . currency forward and swap agreements are utilized to hedge foreign exchange risk which is a result of aes or one of its subsidiaries entering into monetary obligations in currencies other than its own functional currency . the majority of aes 2019s foreign currency derivatives are designated and qualify as either fair value hedges or cash flow hedges . certain derivative instruments and other non-derivative instruments are designated and qualify as hedges of the foreign currency exposure of a net investment in a foreign operation . the company utilizes electric and gas derivative instruments , including swaps , options , forwards and futures , to hedge the risk related to electricity and gas sales and purchases . the majority of aes 2019s electric and gas derivatives are designated and qualify as cash flow hedges . the maximum length of time over which aes is hedging its exposure to variability in future cash flows for forecasted transactions , excluding forecasted transactions related to the payment of variable interest , is three years . for the year ended december 31 , 2001 , a charge of $ 4 million , after income taxes , was recorded for two cash flow hedges that were discontinued because it is probable that the hedged forecasted transaction will not occur . a portion of this charge has been classified as discontinued operations . for the year ended december 31 , 2001 , no fair value hedges were de-recognized or discontinued. .
Question: for 2001 what was the net change in aoci in millions?\\n |
Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: we participate in a medicare health support pilot program through green ribbon health , or grh , a joint- venture company with pfizer health solutions inc . grh is designed to support medicare beneficiaries living with diabetes and/or congestive heart failure in central florida . grh uses disease management initiatives including evidence-based clinical guidelines , personal self-directed change strategies , and personal nurses to help participants navigate the health system . revenues under the contract with cms , which expires october 31 , 2008 unless terminated earlier , are subject to refund unless a savings target is met . to date , all revenues have been deferred until reliable estimates are determinable . our products marketed to commercial segment employers and members smart plans and other consumer products over the last several years , we have developed and offered various commercial products designed to provide options and choices to employers that are annually facing substantial premium increases driven by double-digit medical cost inflation . these smart plans , discussed more fully below , and other consumer offerings , which can be offered on either a fully-insured or aso basis , provided coverage to approximately 564700 members at december 31 , 2007 , representing approximately 16.4% ( 16.4 % ) of our total commercial medical membership as detailed below . smart plans and other consumer membership other commercial membership commercial medical membership .
||smart plans and other consumer membership|other commercial membership|commercial medical membership|
|fully-insured|327900|1480700|1808600|
|aso|236800|1406200|1643000|
|total commercial medical|564700|2886900|3451600|
these products are often offered to employer groups as 201cbundles 201d , where the subscribers are offered various hmo and ppo options , with various employer contribution strategies as determined by the employer . paramount to our product strategy , we have developed a group of innovative consumer products , styled as 201csmart 201d products , that we believe will be a long-term solution for employers . we believe this new generation of products provides more ( 1 ) choices for the individual consumer , ( 2 ) transparency of provider costs , and ( 3 ) benefit designs that engage consumers in the costs and effectiveness of health care choices . innovative tools and technology are available to assist consumers with these decisions , including the trade-offs between higher premiums and point-of-service costs at the time consumers choose their plans , and to suggest ways in which the consumers can maximize their individual benefits at the point they use their plans . we believe that when consumers can make informed choices about the cost and effectiveness of their health care , a sustainable long term solution for employers can be realized . smart products , which accounted for approximately 55% ( 55 % ) of enrollment in all of our consumer-choice plans as of december 31 , 2007 , are only sold to employers who use humana as their sole health insurance carrier . some employers have selected other types of consumer-choice products , such as , ( 1 ) a product with a high deductible , ( 2 ) a catastrophic coverage plan , or ( 3 ) ones that offer a spending account option in conjunction with more traditional medical coverage or as a stand alone plan . unlike our smart products , these products , while valuable in helping employers deal with near-term cost increases by shifting costs to employees , are not considered by us to be long-term comprehensive solutions to the employers 2019 cost dilemma , although we view them as an important interim step . our commercial hmo products provide prepaid health insurance coverage to our members through a network of independent primary care physicians , specialty physicians , and other health care providers who .
Question: considering the smart plans and other consumer membership , what is the percentage of the fully insured among the total commercial medical plans? | 0.58066 | ### Transformed FinQA Question Generation Instructions
#### Step 1: Analyze and Understand the Original FinQA Question
- Objective: Use the given FinQA question to generate a new, logically similar but numerically different question.
- Guidelines:
- Identify the financial concepts and quantitative reasoning in the original question.
- Determine the key variables (e.g., revenue, profit, growth rate, interest) and their relationships.
- Maintain the original question’s structure and complexity.
#### Step 2: Transform and Adapt
- Objective: Create a new FinQA-style question while modifying numerical values and conditions.
- Guidelines:
- Change financial figures, constraints, or business conditions to create a unique question.
- Ensure the transformation maintains financial realism (e.g., realistic market trends, interest rates).
- Retain the original reasoning and computational steps while introducing fresh data points.
#### Step 3: Generate the New FinQA Question
- Objective: Output an original, transformed FinQA question without providing an answer or solution.
- Guidelines:
- Ensure the new question aligns with FinQA’s format and complexity.
- Maintain clarity and well-defined financial relationships.
### Response Rule
- **Generate only the "Transformed FinQA Question" for the given example without including any answer, explanation, or solution.**
### Output Format
#### Transformed FinQA Question: [Write your transformed FinQA question here.]
----
#### Task
#### Original FinQA Question: Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: we participate in a medicare health support pilot program through green ribbon health , or grh , a joint- venture company with pfizer health solutions inc . grh is designed to support medicare beneficiaries living with diabetes and/or congestive heart failure in central florida . grh uses disease management initiatives including evidence-based clinical guidelines , personal self-directed change strategies , and personal nurses to help participants navigate the health system . revenues under the contract with cms , which expires october 31 , 2008 unless terminated earlier , are subject to refund unless a savings target is met . to date , all revenues have been deferred until reliable estimates are determinable . our products marketed to commercial segment employers and members smart plans and other consumer products over the last several years , we have developed and offered various commercial products designed to provide options and choices to employers that are annually facing substantial premium increases driven by double-digit medical cost inflation . these smart plans , discussed more fully below , and other consumer offerings , which can be offered on either a fully-insured or aso basis , provided coverage to approximately 564700 members at december 31 , 2007 , representing approximately 16.4% ( 16.4 % ) of our total commercial medical membership as detailed below . smart plans and other consumer membership other commercial membership commercial medical membership .
||smart plans and other consumer membership|other commercial membership|commercial medical membership|
|fully-insured|327900|1480700|1808600|
|aso|236800|1406200|1643000|
|total commercial medical|564700|2886900|3451600|
these products are often offered to employer groups as 201cbundles 201d , where the subscribers are offered various hmo and ppo options , with various employer contribution strategies as determined by the employer . paramount to our product strategy , we have developed a group of innovative consumer products , styled as 201csmart 201d products , that we believe will be a long-term solution for employers . we believe this new generation of products provides more ( 1 ) choices for the individual consumer , ( 2 ) transparency of provider costs , and ( 3 ) benefit designs that engage consumers in the costs and effectiveness of health care choices . innovative tools and technology are available to assist consumers with these decisions , including the trade-offs between higher premiums and point-of-service costs at the time consumers choose their plans , and to suggest ways in which the consumers can maximize their individual benefits at the point they use their plans . we believe that when consumers can make informed choices about the cost and effectiveness of their health care , a sustainable long term solution for employers can be realized . smart products , which accounted for approximately 55% ( 55 % ) of enrollment in all of our consumer-choice plans as of december 31 , 2007 , are only sold to employers who use humana as their sole health insurance carrier . some employers have selected other types of consumer-choice products , such as , ( 1 ) a product with a high deductible , ( 2 ) a catastrophic coverage plan , or ( 3 ) ones that offer a spending account option in conjunction with more traditional medical coverage or as a stand alone plan . unlike our smart products , these products , while valuable in helping employers deal with near-term cost increases by shifting costs to employees , are not considered by us to be long-term comprehensive solutions to the employers 2019 cost dilemma , although we view them as an important interim step . our commercial hmo products provide prepaid health insurance coverage to our members through a network of independent primary care physicians , specialty physicians , and other health care providers who .
Question: considering the smart plans and other consumer membership , what is the percentage of the fully insured among the total commercial medical plans? |
Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: entergy gulf states louisiana , l.l.c . management 2019s financial discussion and analysis plan to spin off the utility 2019s transmission business see the 201cplan to spin off the utility 2019s transmission business 201d section of entergy corporation and subsidiaries management 2019s financial discussion and analysis for a discussion of this matter , including the planned retirement of debt and preferred securities . results of operations net income 2011 compared to 2010 net income increased $ 12.3 million primarily due to lower interest expense and lower other operation and maintenance expenses , offset by higher depreciation and amortization expenses and a higher effective income tax 2010 compared to 2009 net income increased $ 37.7 million primarily due to higher net revenue , a lower effective income tax rate , and lower interest expense , offset by higher other operation and maintenance expenses , lower other income , and higher taxes other than income taxes . net revenue 2011 compared to 2010 net revenue consists of operating revenues net of : 1 ) fuel , fuel-related expenses , and gas purchased for resale , 2 ) purchased power expenses , and 3 ) other regulatory credits . following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2011 to 2010 . amount ( in millions ) .
||amount ( in millions )|
|2010 net revenue|$ 933.6|
|retail electric price|-20.1 ( 20.1 )|
|volume/weather|-5.2 ( 5.2 )|
|fuel recovery|14.8|
|transmission revenue|12.4|
|other|-2.1 ( 2.1 )|
|2011 net revenue|$ 933.4|
the retail electric price variance is primarily due to an increase in credits passed on to customers as a result of the act 55 storm cost financing . see 201cmanagement 2019s financial discussion and analysis 2013 hurricane gustav and hurricane ike 201d and note 2 to the financial statements for a discussion of the act 55 storm cost financing . the volume/weather variance is primarily due to less favorable weather on the residential sector as well as the unbilled sales period . the decrease was partially offset by an increase of 62 gwh , or 0.3% ( 0.3 % ) , in billed electricity usage , primarily due to increased consumption by an industrial customer as a result of the customer 2019s cogeneration outage and the addition of a new production unit by the industrial customer . the fuel recovery variance resulted primarily from an adjustment to deferred fuel costs in 2010 . see note 2 to the financial statements for a discussion of fuel recovery. .
Question: what as the percent of the net revenue from transmission in 2011 | 0.01328 | ### Transformed FinQA Question Generation Instructions
#### Step 1: Analyze and Understand the Original FinQA Question
- Objective: Use the given FinQA question to generate a new, logically similar but numerically different question.
- Guidelines:
- Identify the financial concepts and quantitative reasoning in the original question.
- Determine the key variables (e.g., revenue, profit, growth rate, interest) and their relationships.
- Maintain the original question’s structure and complexity.
#### Step 2: Transform and Adapt
- Objective: Create a new FinQA-style question while modifying numerical values and conditions.
- Guidelines:
- Change financial figures, constraints, or business conditions to create a unique question.
- Ensure the transformation maintains financial realism (e.g., realistic market trends, interest rates).
- Retain the original reasoning and computational steps while introducing fresh data points.
#### Step 3: Generate the New FinQA Question
- Objective: Output an original, transformed FinQA question without providing an answer or solution.
- Guidelines:
- Ensure the new question aligns with FinQA’s format and complexity.
- Maintain clarity and well-defined financial relationships.
### Response Rule
- **Generate only the "Transformed FinQA Question" for the given example without including any answer, explanation, or solution.**
### Output Format
#### Transformed FinQA Question: [Write your transformed FinQA question here.]
----
#### Task
#### Original FinQA Question: Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: entergy gulf states louisiana , l.l.c . management 2019s financial discussion and analysis plan to spin off the utility 2019s transmission business see the 201cplan to spin off the utility 2019s transmission business 201d section of entergy corporation and subsidiaries management 2019s financial discussion and analysis for a discussion of this matter , including the planned retirement of debt and preferred securities . results of operations net income 2011 compared to 2010 net income increased $ 12.3 million primarily due to lower interest expense and lower other operation and maintenance expenses , offset by higher depreciation and amortization expenses and a higher effective income tax 2010 compared to 2009 net income increased $ 37.7 million primarily due to higher net revenue , a lower effective income tax rate , and lower interest expense , offset by higher other operation and maintenance expenses , lower other income , and higher taxes other than income taxes . net revenue 2011 compared to 2010 net revenue consists of operating revenues net of : 1 ) fuel , fuel-related expenses , and gas purchased for resale , 2 ) purchased power expenses , and 3 ) other regulatory credits . following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2011 to 2010 . amount ( in millions ) .
||amount ( in millions )|
|2010 net revenue|$ 933.6|
|retail electric price|-20.1 ( 20.1 )|
|volume/weather|-5.2 ( 5.2 )|
|fuel recovery|14.8|
|transmission revenue|12.4|
|other|-2.1 ( 2.1 )|
|2011 net revenue|$ 933.4|
the retail electric price variance is primarily due to an increase in credits passed on to customers as a result of the act 55 storm cost financing . see 201cmanagement 2019s financial discussion and analysis 2013 hurricane gustav and hurricane ike 201d and note 2 to the financial statements for a discussion of the act 55 storm cost financing . the volume/weather variance is primarily due to less favorable weather on the residential sector as well as the unbilled sales period . the decrease was partially offset by an increase of 62 gwh , or 0.3% ( 0.3 % ) , in billed electricity usage , primarily due to increased consumption by an industrial customer as a result of the customer 2019s cogeneration outage and the addition of a new production unit by the industrial customer . the fuel recovery variance resulted primarily from an adjustment to deferred fuel costs in 2010 . see note 2 to the financial statements for a discussion of fuel recovery. .
Question: what as the percent of the net revenue from transmission in 2011 |
Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: amount of commitment expiration per period other commercial commitments after millions of dollars total 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2014 .
|other commercial commitmentsmillions of dollars|total|amount of commitment expiration per period 2010|amount of commitment expiration per period 2011|amount of commitment expiration per period 2012|amount of commitment expiration per period 2013|amount of commitment expiration per period 2014|amount of commitment expiration per period after 2014|
|credit facilities [a]|$ 1900|$ -|$ -|$ 1900|$ -|$ -|$ -|
|sale of receivables [b]|600|600|-|-|-|-|-|
|guarantees [c]|416|29|76|24|8|214|65|
|standby letters of credit [d]|22|22|-|-|-|-|-|
|total commercial commitments|$ 2938|$ 651|$ 76|$ 1924|$ 8|$ 214|$ 65|
[a] none of the credit facility was used as of december 31 , 2009 . [b] $ 400 million of the sale of receivables program was utilized at december 31 , 2009 . [c] includes guaranteed obligations related to our headquarters building , equipment financings , and affiliated operations . [d] none of the letters of credit were drawn upon as of december 31 , 2009 . off-balance sheet arrangements sale of receivables 2013 the railroad transfers most of its accounts receivable to union pacific receivables , inc . ( upri ) , a bankruptcy-remote subsidiary , as part of a sale of receivables facility . upri sells , without recourse on a 364-day revolving basis , an undivided interest in such accounts receivable to investors . the total capacity to sell undivided interests to investors under the facility was $ 600 million and $ 700 million at december 31 , 2009 and 2008 , respectively . the value of the outstanding undivided interest held by investors under the facility was $ 400 million and $ 584 million at december 31 , 2009 and 2008 , respectively . during 2009 , upri reduced the outstanding undivided interest held by investors due to a decrease in available receivables . the value of the undivided interest held by investors is not included in our consolidated financial statements . the value of the undivided interest held by investors was supported by $ 817 million and $ 1015 million of accounts receivable held by upri at december 31 , 2009 and 2008 , respectively . at december 31 , 2009 and 2008 , the value of the interest retained by upri was $ 417 million and $ 431 million , respectively . this retained interest is included in accounts receivable in our consolidated financial statements . the interest sold to investors is sold at carrying value , which approximates fair value , and there is no gain or loss recognized from the transaction . the value of the outstanding undivided interest held by investors could fluctuate based upon the availability of eligible receivables and is directly affected by changing business volumes and credit risks , including default and dilution . if default or dilution ratios increase one percent , the value of the outstanding undivided interest held by investors would not change as of december 31 , 2009 . should our credit rating fall below investment grade , the value of the outstanding undivided interest held by investors would be reduced , and , in certain cases , the investors would have the right to discontinue the facility . the railroad services the sold receivables ; however , the railroad does not recognize any servicing asset or liability , as the servicing fees adequately compensate us for these responsibilities . the railroad collected approximately $ 13.8 billion and $ 17.8 billion during the years ended december 31 , 2009 and 2008 , respectively . upri used certain of these proceeds to purchase new receivables under the facility . the costs of the sale of receivables program are included in other income and were $ 9 million , $ 23 million , and $ 35 million for 2009 , 2008 , and 2007 , respectively . the costs include interest , which will vary based on prevailing commercial paper rates , program fees paid to banks , commercial paper issuing costs , and fees for unused commitment availability . the decrease in the 2009 costs was primarily attributable to lower commercial paper rates and a decrease in the outstanding interest held by investors. .
Question: using the value of the undivided interest held by investors and retained by upri at december 31 , 2009 as a proxy for ar balance , what was the average receivable turnover in 2009?\\n\\n[14] : at december 31 , 2009 and 2008 , the value of the interest retained by upri was $ 417 million and $ 431 million , respectively . | 11.18314 | ### Transformed FinQA Question Generation Instructions
#### Step 1: Analyze and Understand the Original FinQA Question
- Objective: Use the given FinQA question to generate a new, logically similar but numerically different question.
- Guidelines:
- Identify the financial concepts and quantitative reasoning in the original question.
- Determine the key variables (e.g., revenue, profit, growth rate, interest) and their relationships.
- Maintain the original question’s structure and complexity.
#### Step 2: Transform and Adapt
- Objective: Create a new FinQA-style question while modifying numerical values and conditions.
- Guidelines:
- Change financial figures, constraints, or business conditions to create a unique question.
- Ensure the transformation maintains financial realism (e.g., realistic market trends, interest rates).
- Retain the original reasoning and computational steps while introducing fresh data points.
#### Step 3: Generate the New FinQA Question
- Objective: Output an original, transformed FinQA question without providing an answer or solution.
- Guidelines:
- Ensure the new question aligns with FinQA’s format and complexity.
- Maintain clarity and well-defined financial relationships.
### Response Rule
- **Generate only the "Transformed FinQA Question" for the given example without including any answer, explanation, or solution.**
### Output Format
#### Transformed FinQA Question: [Write your transformed FinQA question here.]
----
#### Task
#### Original FinQA Question: Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: amount of commitment expiration per period other commercial commitments after millions of dollars total 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2014 .
|other commercial commitmentsmillions of dollars|total|amount of commitment expiration per period 2010|amount of commitment expiration per period 2011|amount of commitment expiration per period 2012|amount of commitment expiration per period 2013|amount of commitment expiration per period 2014|amount of commitment expiration per period after 2014|
|credit facilities [a]|$ 1900|$ -|$ -|$ 1900|$ -|$ -|$ -|
|sale of receivables [b]|600|600|-|-|-|-|-|
|guarantees [c]|416|29|76|24|8|214|65|
|standby letters of credit [d]|22|22|-|-|-|-|-|
|total commercial commitments|$ 2938|$ 651|$ 76|$ 1924|$ 8|$ 214|$ 65|
[a] none of the credit facility was used as of december 31 , 2009 . [b] $ 400 million of the sale of receivables program was utilized at december 31 , 2009 . [c] includes guaranteed obligations related to our headquarters building , equipment financings , and affiliated operations . [d] none of the letters of credit were drawn upon as of december 31 , 2009 . off-balance sheet arrangements sale of receivables 2013 the railroad transfers most of its accounts receivable to union pacific receivables , inc . ( upri ) , a bankruptcy-remote subsidiary , as part of a sale of receivables facility . upri sells , without recourse on a 364-day revolving basis , an undivided interest in such accounts receivable to investors . the total capacity to sell undivided interests to investors under the facility was $ 600 million and $ 700 million at december 31 , 2009 and 2008 , respectively . the value of the outstanding undivided interest held by investors under the facility was $ 400 million and $ 584 million at december 31 , 2009 and 2008 , respectively . during 2009 , upri reduced the outstanding undivided interest held by investors due to a decrease in available receivables . the value of the undivided interest held by investors is not included in our consolidated financial statements . the value of the undivided interest held by investors was supported by $ 817 million and $ 1015 million of accounts receivable held by upri at december 31 , 2009 and 2008 , respectively . at december 31 , 2009 and 2008 , the value of the interest retained by upri was $ 417 million and $ 431 million , respectively . this retained interest is included in accounts receivable in our consolidated financial statements . the interest sold to investors is sold at carrying value , which approximates fair value , and there is no gain or loss recognized from the transaction . the value of the outstanding undivided interest held by investors could fluctuate based upon the availability of eligible receivables and is directly affected by changing business volumes and credit risks , including default and dilution . if default or dilution ratios increase one percent , the value of the outstanding undivided interest held by investors would not change as of december 31 , 2009 . should our credit rating fall below investment grade , the value of the outstanding undivided interest held by investors would be reduced , and , in certain cases , the investors would have the right to discontinue the facility . the railroad services the sold receivables ; however , the railroad does not recognize any servicing asset or liability , as the servicing fees adequately compensate us for these responsibilities . the railroad collected approximately $ 13.8 billion and $ 17.8 billion during the years ended december 31 , 2009 and 2008 , respectively . upri used certain of these proceeds to purchase new receivables under the facility . the costs of the sale of receivables program are included in other income and were $ 9 million , $ 23 million , and $ 35 million for 2009 , 2008 , and 2007 , respectively . the costs include interest , which will vary based on prevailing commercial paper rates , program fees paid to banks , commercial paper issuing costs , and fees for unused commitment availability . the decrease in the 2009 costs was primarily attributable to lower commercial paper rates and a decrease in the outstanding interest held by investors. .
Question: using the value of the undivided interest held by investors and retained by upri at december 31 , 2009 as a proxy for ar balance , what was the average receivable turnover in 2009?\\n\\n[14] : at december 31 , 2009 and 2008 , the value of the interest retained by upri was $ 417 million and $ 431 million , respectively . |
Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: entergy mississippi , inc . management's financial discussion and analysis the net wholesale revenue variance is primarily due to lower profit on joint account sales and reduced capacity revenue from the municipal energy agency of mississippi . gross operating revenues , fuel and purchased power expenses , and other regulatory charges gross operating revenues increased primarily due to an increase of $ 152.5 million in fuel cost recovery revenues due to higher fuel rates , partially offset by a decrease of $ 43 million in gross wholesale revenues due to a decrease in net generation and purchases in excess of decreased net area demand resulting in less energy available for resale sales coupled with a decrease in system agreement remedy receipts . fuel and purchased power expenses increased primarily due to increases in the average market prices of natural gas and purchased power , partially offset by decreased demand and decreased recovery from customers of deferred fuel costs . other regulatory charges increased primarily due to increased recovery through the grand gulf rider of grand gulf capacity costs due to higher rates and increased recovery of costs associated with the power management recovery rider . there is no material effect on net income due to quarterly adjustments to the power management recovery rider . 2007 compared to 2006 net revenue consists of operating revenues net of : 1 ) fuel , fuel-related expenses , and gas purchased for resale , 2 ) purchased power expenses , and 3 ) other regulatory charges ( credits ) . following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2007 to 2006 . amount ( in millions ) .
||amount ( in millions )|
|2006 net revenue|$ 466.1|
|base revenue|7.9|
|volume/weather|4.5|
|transmission revenue|4.1|
|transmission equalization|4.0|
|reserve equalization|3.8|
|attala costs|-10.2 ( 10.2 )|
|other|6.7|
|2007 net revenue|$ 486.9|
the base revenue variance is primarily due to a formula rate plan increase effective july 2007 . the formula rate plan filing is discussed further in "state and local rate regulation" below . the volume/weather variance is primarily due to increased electricity usage primarily in the residential and commercial sectors , including the effect of more favorable weather on billed electric sales in 2007 compared to 2006 . billed electricity usage increased 214 gwh . the increase in usage was partially offset by decreased usage in the industrial sector . the transmission revenue variance is due to higher rates and the addition of new transmission customers in late 2006 . the transmission equalization variance is primarily due to a revision made in 2006 of transmission equalization receipts among entergy companies . the reserve equalization variance is primarily due to a revision in 2006 of reserve equalization payments among entergy companies due to a ferc ruling regarding the inclusion of interruptible loads in reserve .
Question: what percent of the change in revenue was due to volume/weather? | 0.21635 | ### Transformed FinQA Question Generation Instructions
#### Step 1: Analyze and Understand the Original FinQA Question
- Objective: Use the given FinQA question to generate a new, logically similar but numerically different question.
- Guidelines:
- Identify the financial concepts and quantitative reasoning in the original question.
- Determine the key variables (e.g., revenue, profit, growth rate, interest) and their relationships.
- Maintain the original question’s structure and complexity.
#### Step 2: Transform and Adapt
- Objective: Create a new FinQA-style question while modifying numerical values and conditions.
- Guidelines:
- Change financial figures, constraints, or business conditions to create a unique question.
- Ensure the transformation maintains financial realism (e.g., realistic market trends, interest rates).
- Retain the original reasoning and computational steps while introducing fresh data points.
#### Step 3: Generate the New FinQA Question
- Objective: Output an original, transformed FinQA question without providing an answer or solution.
- Guidelines:
- Ensure the new question aligns with FinQA’s format and complexity.
- Maintain clarity and well-defined financial relationships.
### Response Rule
- **Generate only the "Transformed FinQA Question" for the given example without including any answer, explanation, or solution.**
### Output Format
#### Transformed FinQA Question: [Write your transformed FinQA question here.]
----
#### Task
#### Original FinQA Question: Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: entergy mississippi , inc . management's financial discussion and analysis the net wholesale revenue variance is primarily due to lower profit on joint account sales and reduced capacity revenue from the municipal energy agency of mississippi . gross operating revenues , fuel and purchased power expenses , and other regulatory charges gross operating revenues increased primarily due to an increase of $ 152.5 million in fuel cost recovery revenues due to higher fuel rates , partially offset by a decrease of $ 43 million in gross wholesale revenues due to a decrease in net generation and purchases in excess of decreased net area demand resulting in less energy available for resale sales coupled with a decrease in system agreement remedy receipts . fuel and purchased power expenses increased primarily due to increases in the average market prices of natural gas and purchased power , partially offset by decreased demand and decreased recovery from customers of deferred fuel costs . other regulatory charges increased primarily due to increased recovery through the grand gulf rider of grand gulf capacity costs due to higher rates and increased recovery of costs associated with the power management recovery rider . there is no material effect on net income due to quarterly adjustments to the power management recovery rider . 2007 compared to 2006 net revenue consists of operating revenues net of : 1 ) fuel , fuel-related expenses , and gas purchased for resale , 2 ) purchased power expenses , and 3 ) other regulatory charges ( credits ) . following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2007 to 2006 . amount ( in millions ) .
||amount ( in millions )|
|2006 net revenue|$ 466.1|
|base revenue|7.9|
|volume/weather|4.5|
|transmission revenue|4.1|
|transmission equalization|4.0|
|reserve equalization|3.8|
|attala costs|-10.2 ( 10.2 )|
|other|6.7|
|2007 net revenue|$ 486.9|
the base revenue variance is primarily due to a formula rate plan increase effective july 2007 . the formula rate plan filing is discussed further in "state and local rate regulation" below . the volume/weather variance is primarily due to increased electricity usage primarily in the residential and commercial sectors , including the effect of more favorable weather on billed electric sales in 2007 compared to 2006 . billed electricity usage increased 214 gwh . the increase in usage was partially offset by decreased usage in the industrial sector . the transmission revenue variance is due to higher rates and the addition of new transmission customers in late 2006 . the transmission equalization variance is primarily due to a revision made in 2006 of transmission equalization receipts among entergy companies . the reserve equalization variance is primarily due to a revision in 2006 of reserve equalization payments among entergy companies due to a ferc ruling regarding the inclusion of interruptible loads in reserve .
Question: what percent of the change in revenue was due to volume/weather? |
Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: advance auto parts , inc . and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements 2013 ( continued ) december 30 , 2006 , december 31 , 2005 and january 1 , 2005 ( in thousands , except per share data ) 8 . inventories , net inventories are stated at the lower of cost or market , cost being determined using the last-in , first-out ( "lifo" ) method for approximately 93% ( 93 % ) of inventories at both december 30 , 2006 and december 31 , 2005 . under the lifo method , the company 2019s cost of sales reflects the costs of the most currently purchased inventories while the inventory carrying balance represents the costs relating to prices paid in prior years . the company 2019s costs to acquire inventory have been generally decreasing in recent years as a result of its significant growth . accordingly , the cost to replace inventory is less than the lifo balances carried for similar product . as a result of the lifo method and the ability to obtain lower product costs , the company recorded a reduction to cost of sales of $ 9978 for fiscal year ended 2006 , an increase in cost of sales of $ 526 for fiscal year ended 2005 and a reduction to cost of sales of $ 11212 for fiscal year ended 2004 . the remaining inventories are comprised of product cores , which consist of the non-consumable portion of certain parts and batteries and are valued under the first-in , first-out ( "fifo" ) method . core values are included as part of our merchandise costs and are either passed on to the customer or returned to the vendor . additionally , these products are not subject to the frequent cost changes like our other merchandise inventory , thus , there is no material difference from applying either the lifo or fifo valuation methods . the company capitalizes certain purchasing and warehousing costs into inventory . purchasing and warehousing costs included in inventory , at fifo , at december 30 , 2006 and december 31 , 2005 , were $ 95576 and $ 92833 , respectively . inventories consist of the following : december 30 , december 31 , 2006 2005 .
||december 30 2006|december 31 2005|
|inventories at fifo net|$ 1380573|$ 1294310|
|adjustments to state inventories at lifo|82767|72789|
|inventories at lifo net|$ 1463340|$ 1367099|
replacement cost approximated fifo cost at december 30 , 2006 and december 31 , 2005 . inventory quantities are tracked through a perpetual inventory system . the company uses a cycle counting program in all distribution centers , parts delivered quickly warehouses , or pdqs , local area warehouses , or laws , and retail stores to ensure the accuracy of the perpetual inventory quantities of both merchandise and core inventory . the company establishes reserves for estimated shrink based on historical accuracy and effectiveness of the cycle counting program . the company also establishes reserves for potentially excess and obsolete inventories based on current inventory levels and the historical analysis of product sales and current market conditions . the nature of the company 2019s inventory is such that the risk of obsolescence is minimal and excess inventory has historically been returned to the company 2019s vendors for credit . the company provides reserves when less than full credit is expected from a vendor or when liquidating product will result in retail prices below recorded costs . the company 2019s reserves against inventory for these matters were $ 31376 and $ 22825 at december 30 , 2006 and december 31 , 2005 , respectively . 9 . property and equipment : property and equipment are stated at cost , less accumulated depreciation . expenditures for maintenance and repairs are charged directly to expense when incurred ; major improvements are capitalized . when items are sold or retired , the related cost and accumulated depreciation are removed from the accounts , with any gain or loss reflected in the consolidated statements of operations . depreciation of land improvements , buildings , furniture , fixtures and equipment , and vehicles is provided over the estimated useful lives , which range from 2 to 40 years , of the respective assets using the straight-line method. .
Question: what is the percentage increase in inventories due to the adoption of lifo in 2005? | 0.05624 | ### Transformed FinQA Question Generation Instructions
#### Step 1: Analyze and Understand the Original FinQA Question
- Objective: Use the given FinQA question to generate a new, logically similar but numerically different question.
- Guidelines:
- Identify the financial concepts and quantitative reasoning in the original question.
- Determine the key variables (e.g., revenue, profit, growth rate, interest) and their relationships.
- Maintain the original question’s structure and complexity.
#### Step 2: Transform and Adapt
- Objective: Create a new FinQA-style question while modifying numerical values and conditions.
- Guidelines:
- Change financial figures, constraints, or business conditions to create a unique question.
- Ensure the transformation maintains financial realism (e.g., realistic market trends, interest rates).
- Retain the original reasoning and computational steps while introducing fresh data points.
#### Step 3: Generate the New FinQA Question
- Objective: Output an original, transformed FinQA question without providing an answer or solution.
- Guidelines:
- Ensure the new question aligns with FinQA’s format and complexity.
- Maintain clarity and well-defined financial relationships.
### Response Rule
- **Generate only the "Transformed FinQA Question" for the given example without including any answer, explanation, or solution.**
### Output Format
#### Transformed FinQA Question: [Write your transformed FinQA question here.]
----
#### Task
#### Original FinQA Question: Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: advance auto parts , inc . and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements 2013 ( continued ) december 30 , 2006 , december 31 , 2005 and january 1 , 2005 ( in thousands , except per share data ) 8 . inventories , net inventories are stated at the lower of cost or market , cost being determined using the last-in , first-out ( "lifo" ) method for approximately 93% ( 93 % ) of inventories at both december 30 , 2006 and december 31 , 2005 . under the lifo method , the company 2019s cost of sales reflects the costs of the most currently purchased inventories while the inventory carrying balance represents the costs relating to prices paid in prior years . the company 2019s costs to acquire inventory have been generally decreasing in recent years as a result of its significant growth . accordingly , the cost to replace inventory is less than the lifo balances carried for similar product . as a result of the lifo method and the ability to obtain lower product costs , the company recorded a reduction to cost of sales of $ 9978 for fiscal year ended 2006 , an increase in cost of sales of $ 526 for fiscal year ended 2005 and a reduction to cost of sales of $ 11212 for fiscal year ended 2004 . the remaining inventories are comprised of product cores , which consist of the non-consumable portion of certain parts and batteries and are valued under the first-in , first-out ( "fifo" ) method . core values are included as part of our merchandise costs and are either passed on to the customer or returned to the vendor . additionally , these products are not subject to the frequent cost changes like our other merchandise inventory , thus , there is no material difference from applying either the lifo or fifo valuation methods . the company capitalizes certain purchasing and warehousing costs into inventory . purchasing and warehousing costs included in inventory , at fifo , at december 30 , 2006 and december 31 , 2005 , were $ 95576 and $ 92833 , respectively . inventories consist of the following : december 30 , december 31 , 2006 2005 .
||december 30 2006|december 31 2005|
|inventories at fifo net|$ 1380573|$ 1294310|
|adjustments to state inventories at lifo|82767|72789|
|inventories at lifo net|$ 1463340|$ 1367099|
replacement cost approximated fifo cost at december 30 , 2006 and december 31 , 2005 . inventory quantities are tracked through a perpetual inventory system . the company uses a cycle counting program in all distribution centers , parts delivered quickly warehouses , or pdqs , local area warehouses , or laws , and retail stores to ensure the accuracy of the perpetual inventory quantities of both merchandise and core inventory . the company establishes reserves for estimated shrink based on historical accuracy and effectiveness of the cycle counting program . the company also establishes reserves for potentially excess and obsolete inventories based on current inventory levels and the historical analysis of product sales and current market conditions . the nature of the company 2019s inventory is such that the risk of obsolescence is minimal and excess inventory has historically been returned to the company 2019s vendors for credit . the company provides reserves when less than full credit is expected from a vendor or when liquidating product will result in retail prices below recorded costs . the company 2019s reserves against inventory for these matters were $ 31376 and $ 22825 at december 30 , 2006 and december 31 , 2005 , respectively . 9 . property and equipment : property and equipment are stated at cost , less accumulated depreciation . expenditures for maintenance and repairs are charged directly to expense when incurred ; major improvements are capitalized . when items are sold or retired , the related cost and accumulated depreciation are removed from the accounts , with any gain or loss reflected in the consolidated statements of operations . depreciation of land improvements , buildings , furniture , fixtures and equipment , and vehicles is provided over the estimated useful lives , which range from 2 to 40 years , of the respective assets using the straight-line method. .
Question: what is the percentage increase in inventories due to the adoption of lifo in 2005? |
Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: table of contents the following table discloses purchases of shares of our common stock made by us or on our behalf during the fourth quarter of 2017 . period total number of shares purchased average price paid per share total number of shares not purchased as part of publicly announced plans or programs ( a ) total number of shares purchased as part of publicly announced plans or programs approximate dollar value of shares that may yet be purchased under the plans or programs ( b ) .
|period|total numberof sharespurchased|averageprice paidper share|total number ofshares notpurchased as part ofpublicly announcedplans or programs ( a )|total number ofshares purchased aspart of publiclyannounced plans orprograms|approximate dollarvalue of shares thatmay yet be purchasedunder the plans orprograms ( b )|
|october 2017|515762|$ 77.15|292145|223617|$ 1.6 billion|
|november 2017|2186889|$ 81.21|216415|1970474|$ 1.4 billion|
|december 2017|2330263|$ 87.76|798|2329465|$ 1.2 billion|
|total|5032914|$ 83.83|509358|4523556|$ 1.2 billion|
( a ) the shares reported in this column represent purchases settled in the fourth quarter of 2017 relating to ( i ) our purchases of shares in open-market transactions to meet our obligations under stock-based compensation plans , and ( ii ) our purchases of shares from our employees and non-employee directors in connection with the exercise of stock options , the vesting of restricted stock , and other stock compensation transactions in accordance with the terms of our stock-based compensation plans . ( b ) on september 21 , 2016 , we announced that our board of directors authorized our purchase of up to $ 2.5 billion of our outstanding common stock ( the 2016 program ) with no expiration date . as of december 31 , 2017 , we had $ 1.2 billion remaining available for purchase under the 2016 program . on january 23 , 2018 , we announced that our board of directors authorized our purchase of up to an additional $ 2.5 billion of our outstanding common stock with no expiration date. .
Question: for the fourth quarter of 2017 what was the percent of the total number of shares purchased in november | 0.43452 | ### Transformed FinQA Question Generation Instructions
#### Step 1: Analyze and Understand the Original FinQA Question
- Objective: Use the given FinQA question to generate a new, logically similar but numerically different question.
- Guidelines:
- Identify the financial concepts and quantitative reasoning in the original question.
- Determine the key variables (e.g., revenue, profit, growth rate, interest) and their relationships.
- Maintain the original question’s structure and complexity.
#### Step 2: Transform and Adapt
- Objective: Create a new FinQA-style question while modifying numerical values and conditions.
- Guidelines:
- Change financial figures, constraints, or business conditions to create a unique question.
- Ensure the transformation maintains financial realism (e.g., realistic market trends, interest rates).
- Retain the original reasoning and computational steps while introducing fresh data points.
#### Step 3: Generate the New FinQA Question
- Objective: Output an original, transformed FinQA question without providing an answer or solution.
- Guidelines:
- Ensure the new question aligns with FinQA’s format and complexity.
- Maintain clarity and well-defined financial relationships.
### Response Rule
- **Generate only the "Transformed FinQA Question" for the given example without including any answer, explanation, or solution.**
### Output Format
#### Transformed FinQA Question: [Write your transformed FinQA question here.]
----
#### Task
#### Original FinQA Question: Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: table of contents the following table discloses purchases of shares of our common stock made by us or on our behalf during the fourth quarter of 2017 . period total number of shares purchased average price paid per share total number of shares not purchased as part of publicly announced plans or programs ( a ) total number of shares purchased as part of publicly announced plans or programs approximate dollar value of shares that may yet be purchased under the plans or programs ( b ) .
|period|total numberof sharespurchased|averageprice paidper share|total number ofshares notpurchased as part ofpublicly announcedplans or programs ( a )|total number ofshares purchased aspart of publiclyannounced plans orprograms|approximate dollarvalue of shares thatmay yet be purchasedunder the plans orprograms ( b )|
|october 2017|515762|$ 77.15|292145|223617|$ 1.6 billion|
|november 2017|2186889|$ 81.21|216415|1970474|$ 1.4 billion|
|december 2017|2330263|$ 87.76|798|2329465|$ 1.2 billion|
|total|5032914|$ 83.83|509358|4523556|$ 1.2 billion|
( a ) the shares reported in this column represent purchases settled in the fourth quarter of 2017 relating to ( i ) our purchases of shares in open-market transactions to meet our obligations under stock-based compensation plans , and ( ii ) our purchases of shares from our employees and non-employee directors in connection with the exercise of stock options , the vesting of restricted stock , and other stock compensation transactions in accordance with the terms of our stock-based compensation plans . ( b ) on september 21 , 2016 , we announced that our board of directors authorized our purchase of up to $ 2.5 billion of our outstanding common stock ( the 2016 program ) with no expiration date . as of december 31 , 2017 , we had $ 1.2 billion remaining available for purchase under the 2016 program . on january 23 , 2018 , we announced that our board of directors authorized our purchase of up to an additional $ 2.5 billion of our outstanding common stock with no expiration date. .
Question: for the fourth quarter of 2017 what was the percent of the total number of shares purchased in november |
Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: to determine stock-based compensation expense , the grant- date fair value is applied to the options granted with a reduction for estimated forfeitures . we recognize compensation expense for stock options on a straight-line basis over the pro rata vesting period . at december 31 , 2011 and 2010 , options for 12337000 and 13397000 shares of common stock were exercisable at a weighted-average price of $ 106.08 and $ 118.21 , respectively . the total intrinsic value of options exercised during 2012 , 2011 and 2010 was $ 37 million , $ 4 million and $ 5 million . cash received from option exercises under all incentive plans for 2012 , 2011 and 2010 was approximately $ 118 million , $ 41 million and $ 15 million , respectively . the actual tax benefit realized for tax deduction purposes from option exercises under all incentive plans for 2012 , 2011 and 2010 was approximately $ 41 million , $ 14 million and $ 5 million , respectively . there were no options granted in excess of market value in 2012 , 2011 or 2010 . shares of common stock available during the next year for the granting of options and other awards under the incentive plans were 29192854 at december 31 , 2012 . total shares of pnc common stock authorized for future issuance under equity compensation plans totaled 30537674 shares at december 31 , 2012 , which includes shares available for issuance under the incentive plans and the employee stock purchase plan ( espp ) as described below . during 2012 , we issued approximately 1.7 million shares from treasury stock in connection with stock option exercise activity . as with past exercise activity , we currently intend to utilize primarily treasury stock for any future stock option exercises . awards granted to non-employee directors in 2012 , 2011 and 2010 include 25620 , 27090 and 29040 deferred stock units , respectively , awarded under the outside directors deferred stock unit plan . a deferred stock unit is a phantom share of our common stock , which requires liability accounting treatment until such awards are paid to the participants as cash . as there are no vesting or service requirements on these awards , total compensation expense is recognized in full on awarded deferred stock units on the date of grant . incentive/performance unit share awards and restricted stock/unit awards the fair value of nonvested incentive/performance unit share awards and restricted stock/unit awards is initially determined based on prices not less than the market value of our common stock price on the date of grant . the value of certain incentive/ performance unit share awards is subsequently remeasured based on the achievement of one or more financial and other performance goals generally over a three-year period . the personnel and compensation committee of the board of directors approves the final award payout with respect to incentive/performance unit share awards . restricted stock/unit awards have various vesting periods generally ranging from 36 months to 60 months . beginning in 2012 , we incorporated several risk-related performance changes to certain incentive compensation programs . in addition to achieving certain financial performance metrics relative to our peers , the final payout amount will be subject to a negative adjustment if pnc fails to meet certain risk-related performance metrics as specified in the award agreement . however , the p&cc has the discretion to reduce any or all of this negative adjustment under certain circumstances . these awards have a three-year performance period and are payable in either stock or a combination of stock and cash . additionally , performance-based restricted share units were granted in 2012 to certain of our executives in lieu of stock options , with generally the same terms and conditions as the 2011 awards of the same . the weighted-average grant-date fair value of incentive/ performance unit share awards and restricted stock/unit awards granted in 2012 , 2011 and 2010 was $ 60.68 , $ 63.25 and $ 54.59 per share , respectively . we recognize compensation expense for such awards ratably over the corresponding vesting and/or performance periods for each type of program . table 130 : nonvested incentive/performance unit share awards and restricted stock/unit awards 2013 rollforward shares in thousands nonvested incentive/ performance unit shares weighted- average date fair nonvested restricted stock/ shares weighted- average date fair .
|shares in thousands december 31 2011|nonvested incentive/ performance unit shares 830|weighted-averagegrantdate fairvalue $ 61.68|nonvested restricted stock/ unit shares 2512|weighted-averagegrantdate fairvalue $ 54.87|
|granted|465|60.70|1534|60.67|
|vested|-100 ( 100 )|64.21|-831 ( 831 )|45.47|
|forfeited|-76 ( 76 )|60.27|-154 ( 154 )|60.51|
|december 31 2012|1119|$ 61.14|3061|$ 60.04|
in the chart above , the unit shares and related weighted- average grant-date fair value of the incentive/performance awards exclude the effect of dividends on the underlying shares , as those dividends will be paid in cash . at december 31 , 2012 , there was $ 86 million of unrecognized deferred compensation expense related to nonvested share- based compensation arrangements granted under the incentive plans . this cost is expected to be recognized as expense over a period of no longer than five years . the total fair value of incentive/performance unit share and restricted stock/unit awards vested during 2012 , 2011 and 2010 was approximately $ 55 million , $ 52 million and $ 39 million , respectively . the pnc financial services group , inc . 2013 form 10-k 203 .
Question: what was the average weighted-average grant-date fair value of incentive/ performance unit share awards and restricted stock/unit awards granted in 2012 and 2011? | 61.965 | ### Transformed FinQA Question Generation Instructions
#### Step 1: Analyze and Understand the Original FinQA Question
- Objective: Use the given FinQA question to generate a new, logically similar but numerically different question.
- Guidelines:
- Identify the financial concepts and quantitative reasoning in the original question.
- Determine the key variables (e.g., revenue, profit, growth rate, interest) and their relationships.
- Maintain the original question’s structure and complexity.
#### Step 2: Transform and Adapt
- Objective: Create a new FinQA-style question while modifying numerical values and conditions.
- Guidelines:
- Change financial figures, constraints, or business conditions to create a unique question.
- Ensure the transformation maintains financial realism (e.g., realistic market trends, interest rates).
- Retain the original reasoning and computational steps while introducing fresh data points.
#### Step 3: Generate the New FinQA Question
- Objective: Output an original, transformed FinQA question without providing an answer or solution.
- Guidelines:
- Ensure the new question aligns with FinQA’s format and complexity.
- Maintain clarity and well-defined financial relationships.
### Response Rule
- **Generate only the "Transformed FinQA Question" for the given example without including any answer, explanation, or solution.**
### Output Format
#### Transformed FinQA Question: [Write your transformed FinQA question here.]
----
#### Task
#### Original FinQA Question: Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: to determine stock-based compensation expense , the grant- date fair value is applied to the options granted with a reduction for estimated forfeitures . we recognize compensation expense for stock options on a straight-line basis over the pro rata vesting period . at december 31 , 2011 and 2010 , options for 12337000 and 13397000 shares of common stock were exercisable at a weighted-average price of $ 106.08 and $ 118.21 , respectively . the total intrinsic value of options exercised during 2012 , 2011 and 2010 was $ 37 million , $ 4 million and $ 5 million . cash received from option exercises under all incentive plans for 2012 , 2011 and 2010 was approximately $ 118 million , $ 41 million and $ 15 million , respectively . the actual tax benefit realized for tax deduction purposes from option exercises under all incentive plans for 2012 , 2011 and 2010 was approximately $ 41 million , $ 14 million and $ 5 million , respectively . there were no options granted in excess of market value in 2012 , 2011 or 2010 . shares of common stock available during the next year for the granting of options and other awards under the incentive plans were 29192854 at december 31 , 2012 . total shares of pnc common stock authorized for future issuance under equity compensation plans totaled 30537674 shares at december 31 , 2012 , which includes shares available for issuance under the incentive plans and the employee stock purchase plan ( espp ) as described below . during 2012 , we issued approximately 1.7 million shares from treasury stock in connection with stock option exercise activity . as with past exercise activity , we currently intend to utilize primarily treasury stock for any future stock option exercises . awards granted to non-employee directors in 2012 , 2011 and 2010 include 25620 , 27090 and 29040 deferred stock units , respectively , awarded under the outside directors deferred stock unit plan . a deferred stock unit is a phantom share of our common stock , which requires liability accounting treatment until such awards are paid to the participants as cash . as there are no vesting or service requirements on these awards , total compensation expense is recognized in full on awarded deferred stock units on the date of grant . incentive/performance unit share awards and restricted stock/unit awards the fair value of nonvested incentive/performance unit share awards and restricted stock/unit awards is initially determined based on prices not less than the market value of our common stock price on the date of grant . the value of certain incentive/ performance unit share awards is subsequently remeasured based on the achievement of one or more financial and other performance goals generally over a three-year period . the personnel and compensation committee of the board of directors approves the final award payout with respect to incentive/performance unit share awards . restricted stock/unit awards have various vesting periods generally ranging from 36 months to 60 months . beginning in 2012 , we incorporated several risk-related performance changes to certain incentive compensation programs . in addition to achieving certain financial performance metrics relative to our peers , the final payout amount will be subject to a negative adjustment if pnc fails to meet certain risk-related performance metrics as specified in the award agreement . however , the p&cc has the discretion to reduce any or all of this negative adjustment under certain circumstances . these awards have a three-year performance period and are payable in either stock or a combination of stock and cash . additionally , performance-based restricted share units were granted in 2012 to certain of our executives in lieu of stock options , with generally the same terms and conditions as the 2011 awards of the same . the weighted-average grant-date fair value of incentive/ performance unit share awards and restricted stock/unit awards granted in 2012 , 2011 and 2010 was $ 60.68 , $ 63.25 and $ 54.59 per share , respectively . we recognize compensation expense for such awards ratably over the corresponding vesting and/or performance periods for each type of program . table 130 : nonvested incentive/performance unit share awards and restricted stock/unit awards 2013 rollforward shares in thousands nonvested incentive/ performance unit shares weighted- average date fair nonvested restricted stock/ shares weighted- average date fair .
|shares in thousands december 31 2011|nonvested incentive/ performance unit shares 830|weighted-averagegrantdate fairvalue $ 61.68|nonvested restricted stock/ unit shares 2512|weighted-averagegrantdate fairvalue $ 54.87|
|granted|465|60.70|1534|60.67|
|vested|-100 ( 100 )|64.21|-831 ( 831 )|45.47|
|forfeited|-76 ( 76 )|60.27|-154 ( 154 )|60.51|
|december 31 2012|1119|$ 61.14|3061|$ 60.04|
in the chart above , the unit shares and related weighted- average grant-date fair value of the incentive/performance awards exclude the effect of dividends on the underlying shares , as those dividends will be paid in cash . at december 31 , 2012 , there was $ 86 million of unrecognized deferred compensation expense related to nonvested share- based compensation arrangements granted under the incentive plans . this cost is expected to be recognized as expense over a period of no longer than five years . the total fair value of incentive/performance unit share and restricted stock/unit awards vested during 2012 , 2011 and 2010 was approximately $ 55 million , $ 52 million and $ 39 million , respectively . the pnc financial services group , inc . 2013 form 10-k 203 .
Question: what was the average weighted-average grant-date fair value of incentive/ performance unit share awards and restricted stock/unit awards granted in 2012 and 2011? |
Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: stock performance graph : the graph below shows the cumulative total shareholder return assuming the investment of $ 100 , on december 31 , 2010 , and the reinvestment of dividends thereafter , if any , in the company's common stock versus the standard and poor's s&p 500 retail index ( "s&p 500 retail index" ) and the standard and poor's s&p 500 index ( "s&p 500" ) . .
|company/index|december 31 , 2010|december 31 , 2011|december 31 , 2012|december 31 , 2013|december 31 , 2014|december 31 , 2015|
|o'reilly automotive inc .|$ 100|$ 132|$ 148|$ 213|$ 319|$ 419|
|s&p 500 retail index|100|103|128|185|203|252|
|s&p 500|$ 100|$ 100|$ 113|$ 147|$ 164|$ 163|
.
Question: what is the roi of an investment in the o'reilly automotive inc . from 2010 to 2011? | 0.32 | ### Transformed FinQA Question Generation Instructions
#### Step 1: Analyze and Understand the Original FinQA Question
- Objective: Use the given FinQA question to generate a new, logically similar but numerically different question.
- Guidelines:
- Identify the financial concepts and quantitative reasoning in the original question.
- Determine the key variables (e.g., revenue, profit, growth rate, interest) and their relationships.
- Maintain the original question’s structure and complexity.
#### Step 2: Transform and Adapt
- Objective: Create a new FinQA-style question while modifying numerical values and conditions.
- Guidelines:
- Change financial figures, constraints, or business conditions to create a unique question.
- Ensure the transformation maintains financial realism (e.g., realistic market trends, interest rates).
- Retain the original reasoning and computational steps while introducing fresh data points.
#### Step 3: Generate the New FinQA Question
- Objective: Output an original, transformed FinQA question without providing an answer or solution.
- Guidelines:
- Ensure the new question aligns with FinQA’s format and complexity.
- Maintain clarity and well-defined financial relationships.
### Response Rule
- **Generate only the "Transformed FinQA Question" for the given example without including any answer, explanation, or solution.**
### Output Format
#### Transformed FinQA Question: [Write your transformed FinQA question here.]
----
#### Task
#### Original FinQA Question: Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: stock performance graph : the graph below shows the cumulative total shareholder return assuming the investment of $ 100 , on december 31 , 2010 , and the reinvestment of dividends thereafter , if any , in the company's common stock versus the standard and poor's s&p 500 retail index ( "s&p 500 retail index" ) and the standard and poor's s&p 500 index ( "s&p 500" ) . .
|company/index|december 31 , 2010|december 31 , 2011|december 31 , 2012|december 31 , 2013|december 31 , 2014|december 31 , 2015|
|o'reilly automotive inc .|$ 100|$ 132|$ 148|$ 213|$ 319|$ 419|
|s&p 500 retail index|100|103|128|185|203|252|
|s&p 500|$ 100|$ 100|$ 113|$ 147|$ 164|$ 163|
.
Question: what is the roi of an investment in the o'reilly automotive inc . from 2010 to 2011? |
Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: entergy new orleans , inc . management 2019s financial discussion and analysis also in addition to the contractual obligations , entergy new orleans has $ 53.7 million of unrecognized tax benefits and interest net of unused tax attributes and payments for which the timing of payments beyond 12 months cannot be reasonably estimated due to uncertainties in the timing of effective settlement of tax positions . see note 3 to the financial statements for additional information regarding unrecognized tax benefits . the planned capital investment estimate for entergy new orleans reflects capital required to support existing business . the estimated capital expenditures are subject to periodic review and modification and may vary based on the ongoing effects of regulatory constraints , environmental compliance , market volatility , economic trends , changes in project plans , and the ability to access capital . management provides more information on long-term debt and preferred stock maturities in notes 5 and 6 and to the financial statements . as an indirect , wholly-owned subsidiary of entergy corporation , entergy new orleans pays dividends from its earnings at a percentage determined monthly . entergy new orleans 2019s long-term debt indentures contain restrictions on the payment of cash dividends or other distributions on its common and preferred stock . sources of capital entergy new orleans 2019s sources to meet its capital requirements include : internally generated funds ; cash on hand ; and debt and preferred stock issuances . entergy new orleans may refinance , redeem , or otherwise retire debt and preferred stock prior to maturity , to the extent market conditions and interest and dividend rates are favorable . entergy new orleans 2019s receivables from the money pool were as follows as of december 31 for each of the following years: .
|2011|2010|2009|2008|
|( in thousands )|( in thousands )|( in thousands )|( in thousands )|
|$ 9074|$ 21820|$ 66149|$ 60093|
see note 4 to the financial statements for a description of the money pool . entergy new orleans has obtained short-term borrowing authorization from the ferc under which it may borrow through october 2013 , up to the aggregate amount , at any one time outstanding , of $ 100 million . see note 4 to the financial statements for further discussion of entergy new orleans 2019s short-term borrowing limits . the long-term securities issuances of entergy new orleans are limited to amounts authorized by the city council , and the current authorization extends through july 2012 . entergy louisiana 2019s ninemile point unit 6 self-build project in june 2011 , entergy louisiana filed with the lpsc an application seeking certification that the public necessity and convenience would be served by entergy louisiana 2019s construction of a combined-cycle gas turbine generating facility ( ninemile 6 ) at its existing ninemile point electric generating station . ninemile 6 will be a nominally-sized 550 mw unit that is estimated to cost approximately $ 721 million to construct , excluding interconnection and transmission upgrades . entergy gulf states louisiana joined in the application , seeking certification of its purchase under a life-of-unit power purchase agreement of up to 35% ( 35 % ) of the capacity and energy generated by ninemile 6 . the ninemile 6 capacity and energy is proposed to be allocated 55% ( 55 % ) to entergy louisiana , 25% ( 25 % ) to entergy gulf states louisiana , and 20% ( 20 % ) to entergy new orleans . in february 2012 the city council passed a resolution authorizing entergy new orleans to purchase 20% ( 20 % ) of the ninemile 6 energy and capacity . if approvals are obtained from the lpsc and other permitting agencies , ninemile 6 construction is .
Question: by what amount did the receivables from the money pool differ between 2010 and 2011? | -12746.0 | ### Transformed FinQA Question Generation Instructions
#### Step 1: Analyze and Understand the Original FinQA Question
- Objective: Use the given FinQA question to generate a new, logically similar but numerically different question.
- Guidelines:
- Identify the financial concepts and quantitative reasoning in the original question.
- Determine the key variables (e.g., revenue, profit, growth rate, interest) and their relationships.
- Maintain the original question’s structure and complexity.
#### Step 2: Transform and Adapt
- Objective: Create a new FinQA-style question while modifying numerical values and conditions.
- Guidelines:
- Change financial figures, constraints, or business conditions to create a unique question.
- Ensure the transformation maintains financial realism (e.g., realistic market trends, interest rates).
- Retain the original reasoning and computational steps while introducing fresh data points.
#### Step 3: Generate the New FinQA Question
- Objective: Output an original, transformed FinQA question without providing an answer or solution.
- Guidelines:
- Ensure the new question aligns with FinQA’s format and complexity.
- Maintain clarity and well-defined financial relationships.
### Response Rule
- **Generate only the "Transformed FinQA Question" for the given example without including any answer, explanation, or solution.**
### Output Format
#### Transformed FinQA Question: [Write your transformed FinQA question here.]
----
#### Task
#### Original FinQA Question: Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: entergy new orleans , inc . management 2019s financial discussion and analysis also in addition to the contractual obligations , entergy new orleans has $ 53.7 million of unrecognized tax benefits and interest net of unused tax attributes and payments for which the timing of payments beyond 12 months cannot be reasonably estimated due to uncertainties in the timing of effective settlement of tax positions . see note 3 to the financial statements for additional information regarding unrecognized tax benefits . the planned capital investment estimate for entergy new orleans reflects capital required to support existing business . the estimated capital expenditures are subject to periodic review and modification and may vary based on the ongoing effects of regulatory constraints , environmental compliance , market volatility , economic trends , changes in project plans , and the ability to access capital . management provides more information on long-term debt and preferred stock maturities in notes 5 and 6 and to the financial statements . as an indirect , wholly-owned subsidiary of entergy corporation , entergy new orleans pays dividends from its earnings at a percentage determined monthly . entergy new orleans 2019s long-term debt indentures contain restrictions on the payment of cash dividends or other distributions on its common and preferred stock . sources of capital entergy new orleans 2019s sources to meet its capital requirements include : internally generated funds ; cash on hand ; and debt and preferred stock issuances . entergy new orleans may refinance , redeem , or otherwise retire debt and preferred stock prior to maturity , to the extent market conditions and interest and dividend rates are favorable . entergy new orleans 2019s receivables from the money pool were as follows as of december 31 for each of the following years: .
|2011|2010|2009|2008|
|( in thousands )|( in thousands )|( in thousands )|( in thousands )|
|$ 9074|$ 21820|$ 66149|$ 60093|
see note 4 to the financial statements for a description of the money pool . entergy new orleans has obtained short-term borrowing authorization from the ferc under which it may borrow through october 2013 , up to the aggregate amount , at any one time outstanding , of $ 100 million . see note 4 to the financial statements for further discussion of entergy new orleans 2019s short-term borrowing limits . the long-term securities issuances of entergy new orleans are limited to amounts authorized by the city council , and the current authorization extends through july 2012 . entergy louisiana 2019s ninemile point unit 6 self-build project in june 2011 , entergy louisiana filed with the lpsc an application seeking certification that the public necessity and convenience would be served by entergy louisiana 2019s construction of a combined-cycle gas turbine generating facility ( ninemile 6 ) at its existing ninemile point electric generating station . ninemile 6 will be a nominally-sized 550 mw unit that is estimated to cost approximately $ 721 million to construct , excluding interconnection and transmission upgrades . entergy gulf states louisiana joined in the application , seeking certification of its purchase under a life-of-unit power purchase agreement of up to 35% ( 35 % ) of the capacity and energy generated by ninemile 6 . the ninemile 6 capacity and energy is proposed to be allocated 55% ( 55 % ) to entergy louisiana , 25% ( 25 % ) to entergy gulf states louisiana , and 20% ( 20 % ) to entergy new orleans . in february 2012 the city council passed a resolution authorizing entergy new orleans to purchase 20% ( 20 % ) of the ninemile 6 energy and capacity . if approvals are obtained from the lpsc and other permitting agencies , ninemile 6 construction is .
Question: by what amount did the receivables from the money pool differ between 2010 and 2011? |
Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: augusta , georgia mill and $ 2 million of costs associated with the sale of the shorewood business . consumer packaging .
|in millions|2015|2014|2013|
|sales|$ 2940|$ 3403|$ 3435|
|operating profit ( loss )|-25 ( 25 )|178|161|
north american consumer packaging net sales were $ 1.9 billion in 2015 compared with $ 2.0 billion in 2014 and $ 2.0 billion in 2013 . operating profits were $ 81 million ( $ 91 million excluding the cost associated with the planned conversion of our riegelwood mill to 100% ( 100 % ) pulp production , net of proceeds from the sale of the carolina coated bristols brand , and sheet plant closure costs ) in 2015 compared with $ 92 million ( $ 100 million excluding sheet plant closure costs ) in 2014 and $ 63 million ( $ 110 million excluding paper machine shutdown costs and costs related to the sale of the shorewood business ) in 2013 . coated paperboard sales volumes in 2015 were lower than in 2014 reflecting weaker market demand . the business took about 77000 tons of market-related downtime in 2015 compared with about 41000 tons in 2014 . average sales price realizations increased modestly year over year as competitive pressures in the current year only partially offset the impact of sales price increases implemented in 2014 . input costs decreased for energy and chemicals , but wood costs increased . planned maintenance downtime costs were $ 10 million lower in 2015 . operating costs were higher , mainly due to inflation and overhead costs . foodservice sales volumes increased in 2015 compared with 2014 reflecting strong market demand . average sales margins increased due to lower resin costs and a more favorable mix . operating costs and distribution costs were both higher . looking ahead to the first quarter of 2016 , coated paperboard sales volumes are expected to be slightly lower than in the fourth quarter of 2015 due to our exit from the coated bristols market . average sales price realizations are expected to be flat , but margins should benefit from a more favorable product mix . input costs are expected to be higher for wood , chemicals and energy . planned maintenance downtime costs should be $ 4 million higher with a planned maintenance outage scheduled at our augusta mill in the first quarter . foodservice sales volumes are expected to be seasonally lower . average sales margins are expected to improve due to a more favorable mix . operating costs are expected to decrease . european consumer packaging net sales in 2015 were $ 319 million compared with $ 365 million in 2014 and $ 380 million in 2013 . operating profits in 2015 were $ 87 million compared with $ 91 million in 2014 and $ 100 million in 2013 . sales volumes in 2015 compared with 2014 increased in europe , but decreased in russia . average sales margins improved in russia due to slightly higher average sales price realizations and a more favorable mix . in europe average sales margins decreased reflecting lower average sales price realizations and an unfavorable mix . input costs were lower in europe , primarily for wood and energy , but were higher in russia , primarily for wood . looking forward to the first quarter of 2016 , compared with the fourth quarter of 2015 , sales volumes are expected to be stable . average sales price realizations are expected to be slightly higher in both russia and europe . input costs are expected to be flat , while operating costs are expected to increase . asian consumer packaging the company sold its 55% ( 55 % ) equity share in the ip-sun jv in october 2015 . net sales and operating profits presented below include results through september 30 , 2015 . net sales were $ 682 million in 2015 compared with $ 1.0 billion in 2014 and $ 1.1 billion in 2013 . operating profits in 2015 were a loss of $ 193 million ( a loss of $ 19 million excluding goodwill and other asset impairment costs ) compared with losses of $ 5 million in 2014 and $ 2 million in 2013 . sales volumes and average sales price realizations were lower in 2015 due to over-supplied market conditions and competitive pressures . average sales margins were also negatively impacted by a less favorable mix . input costs and freight costs were lower and operating costs also decreased . on october 13 , 2015 , the company finalized the sale of its 55% ( 55 % ) interest in ip asia coated paperboard ( ip- sun jv ) business , within the company's consumer packaging segment , to its chinese coated board joint venture partner , shandong sun holding group co. , ltd . for rmb 149 million ( approximately usd $ 23 million ) . during the third quarter of 2015 , a determination was made that the current book value of the asset group exceeded its estimated fair value of $ 23 million , which was the agreed upon selling price . the 2015 loss includes the net pre-tax impairment charge of $ 174 million ( $ 113 million after taxes ) . a pre-tax charge of $ 186 million was recorded during the third quarter in the company's consumer packaging segment to write down the long-lived assets of this business to their estimated fair value . in the fourth quarter of 2015 , upon the sale and corresponding deconsolidation of ip-sun jv from the company's consolidated balance sheet , final adjustments were made resulting in a reduction of the impairment of $ 12 million . the amount of pre-tax losses related to noncontrolling interest of the ip-sun jv included in the company's consolidated statement of operations for the years ended december 31 , 2015 , 2014 and 2013 were $ 19 million , $ 12 million and $ 8 million , respectively . the amount of pre-tax losses related to the ip-sun jv included in the company's .
Question: what percentage of consumer packaging sales where from north american consumer packaging in 2015? | 0.64626 | ### Transformed FinQA Question Generation Instructions
#### Step 1: Analyze and Understand the Original FinQA Question
- Objective: Use the given FinQA question to generate a new, logically similar but numerically different question.
- Guidelines:
- Identify the financial concepts and quantitative reasoning in the original question.
- Determine the key variables (e.g., revenue, profit, growth rate, interest) and their relationships.
- Maintain the original question’s structure and complexity.
#### Step 2: Transform and Adapt
- Objective: Create a new FinQA-style question while modifying numerical values and conditions.
- Guidelines:
- Change financial figures, constraints, or business conditions to create a unique question.
- Ensure the transformation maintains financial realism (e.g., realistic market trends, interest rates).
- Retain the original reasoning and computational steps while introducing fresh data points.
#### Step 3: Generate the New FinQA Question
- Objective: Output an original, transformed FinQA question without providing an answer or solution.
- Guidelines:
- Ensure the new question aligns with FinQA’s format and complexity.
- Maintain clarity and well-defined financial relationships.
### Response Rule
- **Generate only the "Transformed FinQA Question" for the given example without including any answer, explanation, or solution.**
### Output Format
#### Transformed FinQA Question: [Write your transformed FinQA question here.]
----
#### Task
#### Original FinQA Question: Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: augusta , georgia mill and $ 2 million of costs associated with the sale of the shorewood business . consumer packaging .
|in millions|2015|2014|2013|
|sales|$ 2940|$ 3403|$ 3435|
|operating profit ( loss )|-25 ( 25 )|178|161|
north american consumer packaging net sales were $ 1.9 billion in 2015 compared with $ 2.0 billion in 2014 and $ 2.0 billion in 2013 . operating profits were $ 81 million ( $ 91 million excluding the cost associated with the planned conversion of our riegelwood mill to 100% ( 100 % ) pulp production , net of proceeds from the sale of the carolina coated bristols brand , and sheet plant closure costs ) in 2015 compared with $ 92 million ( $ 100 million excluding sheet plant closure costs ) in 2014 and $ 63 million ( $ 110 million excluding paper machine shutdown costs and costs related to the sale of the shorewood business ) in 2013 . coated paperboard sales volumes in 2015 were lower than in 2014 reflecting weaker market demand . the business took about 77000 tons of market-related downtime in 2015 compared with about 41000 tons in 2014 . average sales price realizations increased modestly year over year as competitive pressures in the current year only partially offset the impact of sales price increases implemented in 2014 . input costs decreased for energy and chemicals , but wood costs increased . planned maintenance downtime costs were $ 10 million lower in 2015 . operating costs were higher , mainly due to inflation and overhead costs . foodservice sales volumes increased in 2015 compared with 2014 reflecting strong market demand . average sales margins increased due to lower resin costs and a more favorable mix . operating costs and distribution costs were both higher . looking ahead to the first quarter of 2016 , coated paperboard sales volumes are expected to be slightly lower than in the fourth quarter of 2015 due to our exit from the coated bristols market . average sales price realizations are expected to be flat , but margins should benefit from a more favorable product mix . input costs are expected to be higher for wood , chemicals and energy . planned maintenance downtime costs should be $ 4 million higher with a planned maintenance outage scheduled at our augusta mill in the first quarter . foodservice sales volumes are expected to be seasonally lower . average sales margins are expected to improve due to a more favorable mix . operating costs are expected to decrease . european consumer packaging net sales in 2015 were $ 319 million compared with $ 365 million in 2014 and $ 380 million in 2013 . operating profits in 2015 were $ 87 million compared with $ 91 million in 2014 and $ 100 million in 2013 . sales volumes in 2015 compared with 2014 increased in europe , but decreased in russia . average sales margins improved in russia due to slightly higher average sales price realizations and a more favorable mix . in europe average sales margins decreased reflecting lower average sales price realizations and an unfavorable mix . input costs were lower in europe , primarily for wood and energy , but were higher in russia , primarily for wood . looking forward to the first quarter of 2016 , compared with the fourth quarter of 2015 , sales volumes are expected to be stable . average sales price realizations are expected to be slightly higher in both russia and europe . input costs are expected to be flat , while operating costs are expected to increase . asian consumer packaging the company sold its 55% ( 55 % ) equity share in the ip-sun jv in october 2015 . net sales and operating profits presented below include results through september 30 , 2015 . net sales were $ 682 million in 2015 compared with $ 1.0 billion in 2014 and $ 1.1 billion in 2013 . operating profits in 2015 were a loss of $ 193 million ( a loss of $ 19 million excluding goodwill and other asset impairment costs ) compared with losses of $ 5 million in 2014 and $ 2 million in 2013 . sales volumes and average sales price realizations were lower in 2015 due to over-supplied market conditions and competitive pressures . average sales margins were also negatively impacted by a less favorable mix . input costs and freight costs were lower and operating costs also decreased . on october 13 , 2015 , the company finalized the sale of its 55% ( 55 % ) interest in ip asia coated paperboard ( ip- sun jv ) business , within the company's consumer packaging segment , to its chinese coated board joint venture partner , shandong sun holding group co. , ltd . for rmb 149 million ( approximately usd $ 23 million ) . during the third quarter of 2015 , a determination was made that the current book value of the asset group exceeded its estimated fair value of $ 23 million , which was the agreed upon selling price . the 2015 loss includes the net pre-tax impairment charge of $ 174 million ( $ 113 million after taxes ) . a pre-tax charge of $ 186 million was recorded during the third quarter in the company's consumer packaging segment to write down the long-lived assets of this business to their estimated fair value . in the fourth quarter of 2015 , upon the sale and corresponding deconsolidation of ip-sun jv from the company's consolidated balance sheet , final adjustments were made resulting in a reduction of the impairment of $ 12 million . the amount of pre-tax losses related to noncontrolling interest of the ip-sun jv included in the company's consolidated statement of operations for the years ended december 31 , 2015 , 2014 and 2013 were $ 19 million , $ 12 million and $ 8 million , respectively . the amount of pre-tax losses related to the ip-sun jv included in the company's .
Question: what percentage of consumer packaging sales where from north american consumer packaging in 2015? |
Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: performance graph the performance graph below shows the five-year cumulative total stockholder return on applied common stock during the period from october 30 , 2011 through october 30 , 2016 . this is compared with the cumulative total return of the standard & poor 2019s 500 stock index and the rdg semiconductor composite index over the same period . the comparison assumes $ 100 was invested on october 30 , 2011 in applied common stock and in each of the foregoing indices and assumes reinvestment of dividends , if any . dollar amounts in the graph are rounded to the nearest whole dollar . the performance shown in the graph represents past performance and should not be considered an indication of future performance . comparison of 5 year cumulative total return* among applied materials , inc. , the s&p 500 index and the rdg semiconductor composite index *assumes $ 100 invested on 10/30/11 in stock or 10/31/11 in index , including reinvestment of dividends . indexes calculated on month-end basis . copyright a9 2016 standard & poor 2019s , a division of s&p global . all rights reserved. .
||10/30/2011|10/28/2012|10/27/2013|10/26/2014|10/25/2015|10/30/2016|
|applied materials|100.00|86.93|148.68|179.96|143.74|255.27|
|s&p 500 index|100.00|115.21|146.52|171.82|180.75|188.90|
|rdg semiconductor composite index|100.00|96.65|127.68|160.86|154.90|191.65|
dividends during each of fiscal 2016 , 2015 , and 2014 , applied 2019s board of directors declared four quarterly cash dividends in the amount of $ 0.10 per share . applied currently anticipates that cash dividends will continue to be paid on a quarterly basis , although the declaration of any future cash dividend is at the discretion of the board of directors and will depend on applied 2019s financial condition , results of operations , capital requirements , business conditions and other factors , as well as a determination by the board of directors that cash dividends are in the best interests of applied 2019s stockholders . 10/30/11 10/28/12 10/27/13 10/26/14 10/25/15 10/30/16 applied materials , inc . s&p 500 rdg semiconductor composite .
Question: what is the total return if 1000000 is invested in applied materials in 2011 and sold in 2012? | -130700.0 | ### Transformed FinQA Question Generation Instructions
#### Step 1: Analyze and Understand the Original FinQA Question
- Objective: Use the given FinQA question to generate a new, logically similar but numerically different question.
- Guidelines:
- Identify the financial concepts and quantitative reasoning in the original question.
- Determine the key variables (e.g., revenue, profit, growth rate, interest) and their relationships.
- Maintain the original question’s structure and complexity.
#### Step 2: Transform and Adapt
- Objective: Create a new FinQA-style question while modifying numerical values and conditions.
- Guidelines:
- Change financial figures, constraints, or business conditions to create a unique question.
- Ensure the transformation maintains financial realism (e.g., realistic market trends, interest rates).
- Retain the original reasoning and computational steps while introducing fresh data points.
#### Step 3: Generate the New FinQA Question
- Objective: Output an original, transformed FinQA question without providing an answer or solution.
- Guidelines:
- Ensure the new question aligns with FinQA’s format and complexity.
- Maintain clarity and well-defined financial relationships.
### Response Rule
- **Generate only the "Transformed FinQA Question" for the given example without including any answer, explanation, or solution.**
### Output Format
#### Transformed FinQA Question: [Write your transformed FinQA question here.]
----
#### Task
#### Original FinQA Question: Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: performance graph the performance graph below shows the five-year cumulative total stockholder return on applied common stock during the period from october 30 , 2011 through october 30 , 2016 . this is compared with the cumulative total return of the standard & poor 2019s 500 stock index and the rdg semiconductor composite index over the same period . the comparison assumes $ 100 was invested on october 30 , 2011 in applied common stock and in each of the foregoing indices and assumes reinvestment of dividends , if any . dollar amounts in the graph are rounded to the nearest whole dollar . the performance shown in the graph represents past performance and should not be considered an indication of future performance . comparison of 5 year cumulative total return* among applied materials , inc. , the s&p 500 index and the rdg semiconductor composite index *assumes $ 100 invested on 10/30/11 in stock or 10/31/11 in index , including reinvestment of dividends . indexes calculated on month-end basis . copyright a9 2016 standard & poor 2019s , a division of s&p global . all rights reserved. .
||10/30/2011|10/28/2012|10/27/2013|10/26/2014|10/25/2015|10/30/2016|
|applied materials|100.00|86.93|148.68|179.96|143.74|255.27|
|s&p 500 index|100.00|115.21|146.52|171.82|180.75|188.90|
|rdg semiconductor composite index|100.00|96.65|127.68|160.86|154.90|191.65|
dividends during each of fiscal 2016 , 2015 , and 2014 , applied 2019s board of directors declared four quarterly cash dividends in the amount of $ 0.10 per share . applied currently anticipates that cash dividends will continue to be paid on a quarterly basis , although the declaration of any future cash dividend is at the discretion of the board of directors and will depend on applied 2019s financial condition , results of operations , capital requirements , business conditions and other factors , as well as a determination by the board of directors that cash dividends are in the best interests of applied 2019s stockholders . 10/30/11 10/28/12 10/27/13 10/26/14 10/25/15 10/30/16 applied materials , inc . s&p 500 rdg semiconductor composite .
Question: what is the total return if 1000000 is invested in applied materials in 2011 and sold in 2012? |
Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: masco corporation notes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) t . other commitments and contingencies litigation . we are subject to claims , charges , litigation and other proceedings in the ordinary course of our business , including those arising from or related to contractual matters , intellectual property , personal injury , environmental matters , product liability , construction defect , insurance coverage , personnel and employment disputes and other matters , including class actions . we believe we have adequate defenses in these matters and that the outcome of these matters is not likely to have a material adverse effect on us . however , there is no assurance that we will prevail in these matters , and we could in the future incur judgments , enter into settlements of claims or revise our expectations regarding the outcome of these matters , which could materially impact our results of operations . in july 2012 , the company reached a settlement agreement related to the columbus drywall litigation . the company and its insulation installation companies named in the suit agreed to pay $ 75 million in return for dismissal with prejudice and full release of all claims . the company and its insulation installation companies continue to deny that the challenged conduct was unlawful and admit no wrongdoing as part of the settlement . a settlement was reached to eliminate the considerable expense and uncertainty of this lawsuit . the company recorded the settlement expense in the second quarter of 2012 and the amount was paid in the fourth quarter of 2012 . warranty . at the time of sale , the company accrues a warranty liability for the estimated cost to provide products , parts or services to repair or replace products in satisfaction of warranty obligations . during the third quarter of 2012 , a business in the other specialty products segment recorded a $ 12 million increase in expected future warranty claims resulting from the completion of an analysis prepared by the company based upon its periodic assessment of recent business unit specific operating trends including , among others , home ownership demographics , sales volumes , manufacturing quality , an analysis of recent warranty claim activity and an estimate of current costs to service anticipated claims . changes in the company 2019s warranty liability were as follows , in millions: .
||2012|2011|
|balance at january 1|$ 102|$ 107|
|accruals for warranties issued during the year|42|28|
|accruals related to pre-existing warranties|16|8|
|settlements made ( in cash or kind ) during the year|-38 ( 38 )|-38 ( 38 )|
|other net ( including currency translation )|-4 ( 4 )|-3 ( 3 )|
|balance at december 31|$ 118|$ 102|
investments . with respect to the company 2019s investments in private equity funds , the company had , at december 31 , 2012 , commitments to contribute up to $ 19 million of additional capital to such funds representing the company 2019s aggregate capital commitment to such funds less capital contributions made to date . the company is contractually obligated to make additional capital contributions to certain of its private equity funds upon receipt of a capital call from the private equity fund . the company has no control over when or if the capital calls will occur . capital calls are funded in cash and generally result in an increase in the carrying value of the company 2019s investment in the private equity fund when paid. .
Question: what was the percent of the change in the accruals for warranties issued from 2011 to 2012 | 0.5 | ### Transformed FinQA Question Generation Instructions
#### Step 1: Analyze and Understand the Original FinQA Question
- Objective: Use the given FinQA question to generate a new, logically similar but numerically different question.
- Guidelines:
- Identify the financial concepts and quantitative reasoning in the original question.
- Determine the key variables (e.g., revenue, profit, growth rate, interest) and their relationships.
- Maintain the original question’s structure and complexity.
#### Step 2: Transform and Adapt
- Objective: Create a new FinQA-style question while modifying numerical values and conditions.
- Guidelines:
- Change financial figures, constraints, or business conditions to create a unique question.
- Ensure the transformation maintains financial realism (e.g., realistic market trends, interest rates).
- Retain the original reasoning and computational steps while introducing fresh data points.
#### Step 3: Generate the New FinQA Question
- Objective: Output an original, transformed FinQA question without providing an answer or solution.
- Guidelines:
- Ensure the new question aligns with FinQA’s format and complexity.
- Maintain clarity and well-defined financial relationships.
### Response Rule
- **Generate only the "Transformed FinQA Question" for the given example without including any answer, explanation, or solution.**
### Output Format
#### Transformed FinQA Question: [Write your transformed FinQA question here.]
----
#### Task
#### Original FinQA Question: Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: masco corporation notes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) t . other commitments and contingencies litigation . we are subject to claims , charges , litigation and other proceedings in the ordinary course of our business , including those arising from or related to contractual matters , intellectual property , personal injury , environmental matters , product liability , construction defect , insurance coverage , personnel and employment disputes and other matters , including class actions . we believe we have adequate defenses in these matters and that the outcome of these matters is not likely to have a material adverse effect on us . however , there is no assurance that we will prevail in these matters , and we could in the future incur judgments , enter into settlements of claims or revise our expectations regarding the outcome of these matters , which could materially impact our results of operations . in july 2012 , the company reached a settlement agreement related to the columbus drywall litigation . the company and its insulation installation companies named in the suit agreed to pay $ 75 million in return for dismissal with prejudice and full release of all claims . the company and its insulation installation companies continue to deny that the challenged conduct was unlawful and admit no wrongdoing as part of the settlement . a settlement was reached to eliminate the considerable expense and uncertainty of this lawsuit . the company recorded the settlement expense in the second quarter of 2012 and the amount was paid in the fourth quarter of 2012 . warranty . at the time of sale , the company accrues a warranty liability for the estimated cost to provide products , parts or services to repair or replace products in satisfaction of warranty obligations . during the third quarter of 2012 , a business in the other specialty products segment recorded a $ 12 million increase in expected future warranty claims resulting from the completion of an analysis prepared by the company based upon its periodic assessment of recent business unit specific operating trends including , among others , home ownership demographics , sales volumes , manufacturing quality , an analysis of recent warranty claim activity and an estimate of current costs to service anticipated claims . changes in the company 2019s warranty liability were as follows , in millions: .
||2012|2011|
|balance at january 1|$ 102|$ 107|
|accruals for warranties issued during the year|42|28|
|accruals related to pre-existing warranties|16|8|
|settlements made ( in cash or kind ) during the year|-38 ( 38 )|-38 ( 38 )|
|other net ( including currency translation )|-4 ( 4 )|-3 ( 3 )|
|balance at december 31|$ 118|$ 102|
investments . with respect to the company 2019s investments in private equity funds , the company had , at december 31 , 2012 , commitments to contribute up to $ 19 million of additional capital to such funds representing the company 2019s aggregate capital commitment to such funds less capital contributions made to date . the company is contractually obligated to make additional capital contributions to certain of its private equity funds upon receipt of a capital call from the private equity fund . the company has no control over when or if the capital calls will occur . capital calls are funded in cash and generally result in an increase in the carrying value of the company 2019s investment in the private equity fund when paid. .
Question: what was the percent of the change in the accruals for warranties issued from 2011 to 2012 |
Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: a wholly-owned subsidiary of the company is a registered life insurance company that maintains separate account assets , representing segregated funds held for purposes of funding individual and group pension contracts , and equal and offsetting separate account liabilities . at decem - ber 31 , 2008 and 2007 , the level 3 separate account assets were approximately $ 4 and $ 12 , respectively . the changes in level 3 assets primarily relate to purchases , sales and gains/ ( losses ) . the net investment income and net gains and losses attributable to separate account assets accrue directly to the contract owner and are not reported as non-operating income ( expense ) on the consolidated statements of income . level 3 assets , which includes equity method investments or consolidated investments of real estate funds , private equity funds and funds of private equity funds are valued based upon valuations received from internal as well as third party fund managers . fair valuations at the underlying funds are based on a combination of methods which may include third-party independent appraisals and discounted cash flow techniques . direct investments in private equity companies held by funds of private equity funds are valued based on an assessment of each under - lying investment , incorporating evaluation of additional significant third party financing , changes in valuations of comparable peer companies and the business environment of the companies , among other factors . see note 2 for further detail on the fair value policies by the underlying funds . changes in level 3 assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis for the year ended december 31 , 2008 .
||investments|other assets|
|december 31 2007|$ 1240|$ 2014|
|realized and unrealized gains / ( losses ) net|-409 ( 409 )|-16 ( 16 )|
|purchases sales other settlements and issuances net|11|2|
|net transfers in and/or out of level 3|-29 ( 29 )|78|
|december 31 2008|$ 813|$ 64|
|total net ( losses ) for the period included in earnings attributable to the change in unrealized gains or ( losses ) relating to assets stillheld at the reporting date|$ -366 ( 366 )|$ -17 ( 17 )|
total net ( losses ) for the period included in earnings attributable to the change in unrealized gains or ( losses ) relating to assets still held at the reporting date $ ( 366 ) $ ( 17 ) realized and unrealized gains and losses recorded for level 3 assets are reported in non-operating income ( expense ) on the consolidated statements of income . non-controlling interest expense is recorded for consoli- dated investments to reflect the portion of gains and losses not attributable to the company . the company transfers assets in and/or out of level 3 as significant inputs , including performance attributes , used for the fair value measurement become observable . 6 . variable interest entities in the normal course of business , the company is the manager of various types of sponsored investment vehicles , including collateralized debt obligations and sponsored investment funds , that may be considered vies . the company receives management fees or other incen- tive related fees for its services and may from time to time own equity or debt securities or enter into derivatives with the vehicles , each of which are considered variable inter- ests . the company engages in these variable interests principally to address client needs through the launch of such investment vehicles . the vies are primarily financed via capital contributed by equity and debt holders . the company 2019s involvement in financing the operations of the vies is limited to its equity interests , unfunded capital commitments for certain sponsored investment funds and its capital support agreements for two enhanced cash funds . the primary beneficiary of a vie is the party that absorbs a majority of the entity 2019s expected losses , receives a major - ity of the entity 2019s expected residual returns or both as a result of holding variable interests . in order to determine whether the company is the primary beneficiary of a vie , management must make significant estimates and assumptions of probable future cash flows and assign probabilities to different cash flow scenarios . assumptions made in such analyses include , but are not limited to , market prices of securities , market interest rates , poten- tial credit defaults on individual securities or default rates on a portfolio of securities , gain realization , liquidity or marketability of certain securities , discount rates and the probability of certain other outcomes . vies in which blackrock is the primary beneficiary at december 31 , 2008 , the company was the primary beneficiary of three vies , which resulted in consolidation of three sponsored investment funds ( including two cash management funds and one private equity fund of funds ) . creditors of the vies do not have recourse to the credit of the company . during 2008 , the company determined it became the primary beneficiary of two enhanced cash management funds as a result of concluding that under various cash 177528_txt_59_96:layout 1 3/26/09 10:32 pm page 73 .
Question: what percent did the realized and unrealized losses effect the assets as of 2008? | 0.3347 | ### Transformed FinQA Question Generation Instructions
#### Step 1: Analyze and Understand the Original FinQA Question
- Objective: Use the given FinQA question to generate a new, logically similar but numerically different question.
- Guidelines:
- Identify the financial concepts and quantitative reasoning in the original question.
- Determine the key variables (e.g., revenue, profit, growth rate, interest) and their relationships.
- Maintain the original question’s structure and complexity.
#### Step 2: Transform and Adapt
- Objective: Create a new FinQA-style question while modifying numerical values and conditions.
- Guidelines:
- Change financial figures, constraints, or business conditions to create a unique question.
- Ensure the transformation maintains financial realism (e.g., realistic market trends, interest rates).
- Retain the original reasoning and computational steps while introducing fresh data points.
#### Step 3: Generate the New FinQA Question
- Objective: Output an original, transformed FinQA question without providing an answer or solution.
- Guidelines:
- Ensure the new question aligns with FinQA’s format and complexity.
- Maintain clarity and well-defined financial relationships.
### Response Rule
- **Generate only the "Transformed FinQA Question" for the given example without including any answer, explanation, or solution.**
### Output Format
#### Transformed FinQA Question: [Write your transformed FinQA question here.]
----
#### Task
#### Original FinQA Question: Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: a wholly-owned subsidiary of the company is a registered life insurance company that maintains separate account assets , representing segregated funds held for purposes of funding individual and group pension contracts , and equal and offsetting separate account liabilities . at decem - ber 31 , 2008 and 2007 , the level 3 separate account assets were approximately $ 4 and $ 12 , respectively . the changes in level 3 assets primarily relate to purchases , sales and gains/ ( losses ) . the net investment income and net gains and losses attributable to separate account assets accrue directly to the contract owner and are not reported as non-operating income ( expense ) on the consolidated statements of income . level 3 assets , which includes equity method investments or consolidated investments of real estate funds , private equity funds and funds of private equity funds are valued based upon valuations received from internal as well as third party fund managers . fair valuations at the underlying funds are based on a combination of methods which may include third-party independent appraisals and discounted cash flow techniques . direct investments in private equity companies held by funds of private equity funds are valued based on an assessment of each under - lying investment , incorporating evaluation of additional significant third party financing , changes in valuations of comparable peer companies and the business environment of the companies , among other factors . see note 2 for further detail on the fair value policies by the underlying funds . changes in level 3 assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis for the year ended december 31 , 2008 .
||investments|other assets|
|december 31 2007|$ 1240|$ 2014|
|realized and unrealized gains / ( losses ) net|-409 ( 409 )|-16 ( 16 )|
|purchases sales other settlements and issuances net|11|2|
|net transfers in and/or out of level 3|-29 ( 29 )|78|
|december 31 2008|$ 813|$ 64|
|total net ( losses ) for the period included in earnings attributable to the change in unrealized gains or ( losses ) relating to assets stillheld at the reporting date|$ -366 ( 366 )|$ -17 ( 17 )|
total net ( losses ) for the period included in earnings attributable to the change in unrealized gains or ( losses ) relating to assets still held at the reporting date $ ( 366 ) $ ( 17 ) realized and unrealized gains and losses recorded for level 3 assets are reported in non-operating income ( expense ) on the consolidated statements of income . non-controlling interest expense is recorded for consoli- dated investments to reflect the portion of gains and losses not attributable to the company . the company transfers assets in and/or out of level 3 as significant inputs , including performance attributes , used for the fair value measurement become observable . 6 . variable interest entities in the normal course of business , the company is the manager of various types of sponsored investment vehicles , including collateralized debt obligations and sponsored investment funds , that may be considered vies . the company receives management fees or other incen- tive related fees for its services and may from time to time own equity or debt securities or enter into derivatives with the vehicles , each of which are considered variable inter- ests . the company engages in these variable interests principally to address client needs through the launch of such investment vehicles . the vies are primarily financed via capital contributed by equity and debt holders . the company 2019s involvement in financing the operations of the vies is limited to its equity interests , unfunded capital commitments for certain sponsored investment funds and its capital support agreements for two enhanced cash funds . the primary beneficiary of a vie is the party that absorbs a majority of the entity 2019s expected losses , receives a major - ity of the entity 2019s expected residual returns or both as a result of holding variable interests . in order to determine whether the company is the primary beneficiary of a vie , management must make significant estimates and assumptions of probable future cash flows and assign probabilities to different cash flow scenarios . assumptions made in such analyses include , but are not limited to , market prices of securities , market interest rates , poten- tial credit defaults on individual securities or default rates on a portfolio of securities , gain realization , liquidity or marketability of certain securities , discount rates and the probability of certain other outcomes . vies in which blackrock is the primary beneficiary at december 31 , 2008 , the company was the primary beneficiary of three vies , which resulted in consolidation of three sponsored investment funds ( including two cash management funds and one private equity fund of funds ) . creditors of the vies do not have recourse to the credit of the company . during 2008 , the company determined it became the primary beneficiary of two enhanced cash management funds as a result of concluding that under various cash 177528_txt_59_96:layout 1 3/26/09 10:32 pm page 73 .
Question: what percent did the realized and unrealized losses effect the assets as of 2008? |
Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: long-term product offerings include active and index strategies . our active strategies seek to earn attractive returns in excess of a market benchmark or performance hurdle while maintaining an appropriate risk profile . we offer two types of active strategies : those that rely primarily on fundamental research and those that utilize primarily quantitative models to drive portfolio construction . in contrast , index strategies seek to closely track the returns of a corresponding index , generally by investing in substantially the same underlying securities within the index or in a subset of those securities selected to approximate a similar risk and return profile of the index . index strategies include both our non-etf index products and ishares etfs . althoughmany clients use both active and index strategies , the application of these strategies may differ . for example , clients may use index products to gain exposure to a market or asset class . in addition , institutional non-etf index assignments tend to be very large ( multi-billion dollars ) and typically reflect low fee rates . this has the potential to exaggerate the significance of net flows in institutional index products on blackrock 2019s revenues and earnings . equity year-end 2015 equity aum totaled $ 2.424 trillion , reflecting net inflows of $ 52.8 billion . net inflows included $ 78.4 billion and $ 4.2 billion into ishares and active products , respectively . ishares net inflows were driven by the core series and flows into broad developed market equity exposures , and active net inflows reflected demand for international equities . ishares and active net inflows were partially offset by non-etf index net outflows of $ 29.8 billion . blackrock 2019s effective fee rates fluctuate due to changes in aummix . approximately half of blackrock 2019s equity aum is tied to international markets , including emerging markets , which tend to have higher fee rates than u.s . equity strategies . accordingly , fluctuations in international equity markets , which do not consistently move in tandemwith u.s . markets , may have a greater impact on blackrock 2019s effective equity fee rates and revenues . fixed income fixed income aum ended 2015 at $ 1.422 trillion , increasing $ 28.7 billion , or 2% ( 2 % ) , from december 31 , 2014 . the increase in aum reflected $ 76.9 billion in net inflows , partially offset by $ 48.2 billion in net market depreciation and foreign exchange movements . in 2015 , active net inflows of $ 35.9 billion were diversified across fixed income offerings , with strong flows into our unconstrained , total return and high yield strategies . flagship funds in these product areas include our unconstrained strategic income opportunities and fixed income strategies funds , with net inflows of $ 7.0 billion and $ 3.7 billion , respectively ; our total return fund with net inflows of $ 2.7 billion ; and our high yield bond fund with net inflows of $ 3.5 billion . fixed income ishares net inflows of $ 50.3 billion were led by flows into core , corporate and high yield bond funds . active and ishares net inflows were partially offset by non-etf index net outflows of $ 9.3 billion . multi-asset class blackrock 2019s multi-asset class teammanages a variety of balanced funds and bespoke mandates for a diversified client base that leverages our broad investment expertise in global equities , bonds , currencies and commodities , and our extensive risk management capabilities . investment solutions might include a combination of long-only portfolios and alternative investments as well as tactical asset allocation overlays . component changes in multi-asset class aum for 2015 are presented below . ( in millions ) december 31 , 2014 net inflows ( outflows ) acquisition ( 1 ) market change fx impact december 31 , 2015 asset allocation and balanced $ 183032 $ 12926 $ 2014 $ ( 6731 ) $ ( 3391 ) $ 185836 .
|( in millions )|december 312014|net inflows ( outflows )|acquisition ( 1 )|market change|fx impact|december 312015|
|asset allocation and balanced|$ 183032|$ 12926|$ 2014|$ -6731 ( 6731 )|$ -3391 ( 3391 )|$ 185836|
|target date/risk|128611|218|2014|-1308 ( 1308 )|-1857 ( 1857 )|125664|
|fiduciary|66194|3985|2014|627|-6373 ( 6373 )|64433|
|futureadvisor|2014|38|366|-1 ( 1 )|2014|403|
|multi-asset|$ 377837|$ 17167|$ 366|$ -7413 ( 7413 )|$ -11621 ( 11621 )|$ 376336|
( 1 ) amounts represent $ 366 million of aum acquired in the futureadvisor acquisition in october 2015 . the futureadvisor acquisition amount does not include aum that was held in ishares holdings . multi-asset class net inflows reflected ongoing institutional demand for our solutions-based advice with $ 17.4 billion of net inflows coming from institutional clients . defined contribution plans of institutional clients remained a significant driver of flows , and contributed $ 7.3 billion to institutional multi-asset class net new business in 2015 , primarily into target date and target risk product offerings . retail net outflows of $ 1.3 billion were primarily due to a large single-client transition out of mutual funds into a series of ishares across asset classes . notwithstanding this transition , retail flows reflected demand for our multi-asset income fund family , which raised $ 4.6 billion in 2015 . the company 2019s multi-asset class strategies include the following : 2022 asset allocation and balanced products represented 49% ( 49 % ) of multi-asset class aum at year-end , with growth in aum driven by net new business of $ 12.9 billion . these strategies combine equity , fixed income and alternative components for investors seeking a tailored solution relative to a specific benchmark and within a risk budget . in certain cases , these strategies seek to minimize downside risk through diversification , derivatives strategies and tactical asset allocation decisions . flagship products in this category include our global allocation andmulti-asset income suites. .
Question: what percent of the muilti asset value is from the asset allocation and balanced section? | 0.4938 | ### Transformed FinQA Question Generation Instructions
#### Step 1: Analyze and Understand the Original FinQA Question
- Objective: Use the given FinQA question to generate a new, logically similar but numerically different question.
- Guidelines:
- Identify the financial concepts and quantitative reasoning in the original question.
- Determine the key variables (e.g., revenue, profit, growth rate, interest) and their relationships.
- Maintain the original question’s structure and complexity.
#### Step 2: Transform and Adapt
- Objective: Create a new FinQA-style question while modifying numerical values and conditions.
- Guidelines:
- Change financial figures, constraints, or business conditions to create a unique question.
- Ensure the transformation maintains financial realism (e.g., realistic market trends, interest rates).
- Retain the original reasoning and computational steps while introducing fresh data points.
#### Step 3: Generate the New FinQA Question
- Objective: Output an original, transformed FinQA question without providing an answer or solution.
- Guidelines:
- Ensure the new question aligns with FinQA’s format and complexity.
- Maintain clarity and well-defined financial relationships.
### Response Rule
- **Generate only the "Transformed FinQA Question" for the given example without including any answer, explanation, or solution.**
### Output Format
#### Transformed FinQA Question: [Write your transformed FinQA question here.]
----
#### Task
#### Original FinQA Question: Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: long-term product offerings include active and index strategies . our active strategies seek to earn attractive returns in excess of a market benchmark or performance hurdle while maintaining an appropriate risk profile . we offer two types of active strategies : those that rely primarily on fundamental research and those that utilize primarily quantitative models to drive portfolio construction . in contrast , index strategies seek to closely track the returns of a corresponding index , generally by investing in substantially the same underlying securities within the index or in a subset of those securities selected to approximate a similar risk and return profile of the index . index strategies include both our non-etf index products and ishares etfs . althoughmany clients use both active and index strategies , the application of these strategies may differ . for example , clients may use index products to gain exposure to a market or asset class . in addition , institutional non-etf index assignments tend to be very large ( multi-billion dollars ) and typically reflect low fee rates . this has the potential to exaggerate the significance of net flows in institutional index products on blackrock 2019s revenues and earnings . equity year-end 2015 equity aum totaled $ 2.424 trillion , reflecting net inflows of $ 52.8 billion . net inflows included $ 78.4 billion and $ 4.2 billion into ishares and active products , respectively . ishares net inflows were driven by the core series and flows into broad developed market equity exposures , and active net inflows reflected demand for international equities . ishares and active net inflows were partially offset by non-etf index net outflows of $ 29.8 billion . blackrock 2019s effective fee rates fluctuate due to changes in aummix . approximately half of blackrock 2019s equity aum is tied to international markets , including emerging markets , which tend to have higher fee rates than u.s . equity strategies . accordingly , fluctuations in international equity markets , which do not consistently move in tandemwith u.s . markets , may have a greater impact on blackrock 2019s effective equity fee rates and revenues . fixed income fixed income aum ended 2015 at $ 1.422 trillion , increasing $ 28.7 billion , or 2% ( 2 % ) , from december 31 , 2014 . the increase in aum reflected $ 76.9 billion in net inflows , partially offset by $ 48.2 billion in net market depreciation and foreign exchange movements . in 2015 , active net inflows of $ 35.9 billion were diversified across fixed income offerings , with strong flows into our unconstrained , total return and high yield strategies . flagship funds in these product areas include our unconstrained strategic income opportunities and fixed income strategies funds , with net inflows of $ 7.0 billion and $ 3.7 billion , respectively ; our total return fund with net inflows of $ 2.7 billion ; and our high yield bond fund with net inflows of $ 3.5 billion . fixed income ishares net inflows of $ 50.3 billion were led by flows into core , corporate and high yield bond funds . active and ishares net inflows were partially offset by non-etf index net outflows of $ 9.3 billion . multi-asset class blackrock 2019s multi-asset class teammanages a variety of balanced funds and bespoke mandates for a diversified client base that leverages our broad investment expertise in global equities , bonds , currencies and commodities , and our extensive risk management capabilities . investment solutions might include a combination of long-only portfolios and alternative investments as well as tactical asset allocation overlays . component changes in multi-asset class aum for 2015 are presented below . ( in millions ) december 31 , 2014 net inflows ( outflows ) acquisition ( 1 ) market change fx impact december 31 , 2015 asset allocation and balanced $ 183032 $ 12926 $ 2014 $ ( 6731 ) $ ( 3391 ) $ 185836 .
|( in millions )|december 312014|net inflows ( outflows )|acquisition ( 1 )|market change|fx impact|december 312015|
|asset allocation and balanced|$ 183032|$ 12926|$ 2014|$ -6731 ( 6731 )|$ -3391 ( 3391 )|$ 185836|
|target date/risk|128611|218|2014|-1308 ( 1308 )|-1857 ( 1857 )|125664|
|fiduciary|66194|3985|2014|627|-6373 ( 6373 )|64433|
|futureadvisor|2014|38|366|-1 ( 1 )|2014|403|
|multi-asset|$ 377837|$ 17167|$ 366|$ -7413 ( 7413 )|$ -11621 ( 11621 )|$ 376336|
( 1 ) amounts represent $ 366 million of aum acquired in the futureadvisor acquisition in october 2015 . the futureadvisor acquisition amount does not include aum that was held in ishares holdings . multi-asset class net inflows reflected ongoing institutional demand for our solutions-based advice with $ 17.4 billion of net inflows coming from institutional clients . defined contribution plans of institutional clients remained a significant driver of flows , and contributed $ 7.3 billion to institutional multi-asset class net new business in 2015 , primarily into target date and target risk product offerings . retail net outflows of $ 1.3 billion were primarily due to a large single-client transition out of mutual funds into a series of ishares across asset classes . notwithstanding this transition , retail flows reflected demand for our multi-asset income fund family , which raised $ 4.6 billion in 2015 . the company 2019s multi-asset class strategies include the following : 2022 asset allocation and balanced products represented 49% ( 49 % ) of multi-asset class aum at year-end , with growth in aum driven by net new business of $ 12.9 billion . these strategies combine equity , fixed income and alternative components for investors seeking a tailored solution relative to a specific benchmark and within a risk budget . in certain cases , these strategies seek to minimize downside risk through diversification , derivatives strategies and tactical asset allocation decisions . flagship products in this category include our global allocation andmulti-asset income suites. .
Question: what percent of the muilti asset value is from the asset allocation and balanced section? |
Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: aeronautics business segment 2019s results of operations discussion . the increase in our consolidated net adjustments for 2011 as compared to 2010 primarily was due to an increase in profit booking rate adjustments at our is&gs and aeronautics business segments . aeronautics our aeronautics business segment is engaged in the research , design , development , manufacture , integration , sustainment , support , and upgrade of advanced military aircraft , including combat and air mobility aircraft , unmanned air vehicles , and related technologies . aeronautics 2019 major programs include the f-35 lightning ii joint strike fighter , f-22 raptor , f-16 fighting falcon , c-130 hercules , and the c-5m super galaxy . aeronautics 2019 operating results included the following ( in millions ) : .
||2012|2011|2010|
|net sales|$ 14953|$ 14362|$ 13109|
|operating profit|1699|1630|1498|
|operating margins|11.4% ( 11.4 % )|11.3% ( 11.3 % )|11.4% ( 11.4 % )|
|backlog at year-end|30100|30500|27500|
2012 compared to 2011 aeronautics 2019 net sales for 2012 increased $ 591 million , or 4% ( 4 % ) , compared to 2011 . the increase was attributable to higher net sales of approximately $ 745 million from f-35 lrip contracts principally due to increased production volume ; about $ 285 million from f-16 programs primarily due to higher aircraft deliveries ( 37 f-16 aircraft delivered in 2012 compared to 22 in 2011 ) partially offset by lower volume on sustainment activities due to the completion of modification programs for certain international customers ; and approximately $ 140 million from c-5 programs due to higher aircraft deliveries ( four c-5m aircraft delivered in 2012 compared to two in 2011 ) . partially offsetting the increases were lower net sales of approximately $ 365 million from decreased production volume and lower risk retirements on the f-22 program as final aircraft deliveries were completed in the second quarter of 2012 ; approximately $ 110 million from the f-35 development contract primarily due to the inception-to-date effect of reducing the profit booking rate in the second quarter of 2012 and to a lesser extent lower volume ; and about $ 95 million from a decrease in volume on other sustainment activities partially offset by various other aeronautics programs due to higher volume . net sales for c-130 programs were comparable to 2011 as a decline in sustainment activities largely was offset by increased aircraft deliveries . aeronautics 2019 operating profit for 2012 increased $ 69 million , or 4% ( 4 % ) , compared to 2011 . the increase was attributable to higher operating profit of approximately $ 105 million from c-130 programs due to an increase in risk retirements ; about $ 50 million from f-16 programs due to higher aircraft deliveries partially offset by a decline in risk retirements ; approximately $ 50 million from f-35 lrip contracts due to increased production volume and risk retirements ; and about $ 50 million from the completion of purchased intangible asset amortization on certain f-16 contracts . partially offsetting the increases was lower operating profit of about $ 90 million from the f-35 development contract primarily due to the inception- to-date effect of reducing the profit booking rate in the second quarter of 2012 ; approximately $ 50 million from decreased production volume and risk retirements on the f-22 program partially offset by a resolution of a contractual matter in the second quarter of 2012 ; and approximately $ 45 million primarily due to a decrease in risk retirements on other sustainment activities partially offset by various other aeronautics programs due to increased risk retirements and volume . operating profit for c-5 programs was comparable to 2011 . adjustments not related to volume , including net profit booking rate adjustments and other matters described above , were approximately $ 30 million lower for 2012 compared to 2011 . 2011 compared to 2010 aeronautics 2019 net sales for 2011 increased $ 1.3 billion , or 10% ( 10 % ) , compared to 2010 . the growth in net sales primarily was due to higher volume of about $ 850 million for work performed on the f-35 lrip contracts as production increased ; higher volume of about $ 745 million for c-130 programs due to an increase in deliveries ( 33 c-130j aircraft delivered in 2011 compared to 25 during 2010 ) and support activities ; about $ 425 million for f-16 support activities and an increase in aircraft deliveries ( 22 f-16 aircraft delivered in 2011 compared to 20 during 2010 ) ; and approximately $ 90 million for higher volume on c-5 programs ( two c-5m aircraft delivered in 2011 compared to one during 2010 ) . these increases partially were offset by a decline in net sales of approximately $ 675 million due to lower volume on the f-22 program and lower net sales of about $ 155 million for the f-35 development contract as development work decreased. .
Question: what is the growth rate in operating profit for aeronautics in 2011? | 0.08812 | ### Transformed FinQA Question Generation Instructions
#### Step 1: Analyze and Understand the Original FinQA Question
- Objective: Use the given FinQA question to generate a new, logically similar but numerically different question.
- Guidelines:
- Identify the financial concepts and quantitative reasoning in the original question.
- Determine the key variables (e.g., revenue, profit, growth rate, interest) and their relationships.
- Maintain the original question’s structure and complexity.
#### Step 2: Transform and Adapt
- Objective: Create a new FinQA-style question while modifying numerical values and conditions.
- Guidelines:
- Change financial figures, constraints, or business conditions to create a unique question.
- Ensure the transformation maintains financial realism (e.g., realistic market trends, interest rates).
- Retain the original reasoning and computational steps while introducing fresh data points.
#### Step 3: Generate the New FinQA Question
- Objective: Output an original, transformed FinQA question without providing an answer or solution.
- Guidelines:
- Ensure the new question aligns with FinQA’s format and complexity.
- Maintain clarity and well-defined financial relationships.
### Response Rule
- **Generate only the "Transformed FinQA Question" for the given example without including any answer, explanation, or solution.**
### Output Format
#### Transformed FinQA Question: [Write your transformed FinQA question here.]
----
#### Task
#### Original FinQA Question: Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: aeronautics business segment 2019s results of operations discussion . the increase in our consolidated net adjustments for 2011 as compared to 2010 primarily was due to an increase in profit booking rate adjustments at our is&gs and aeronautics business segments . aeronautics our aeronautics business segment is engaged in the research , design , development , manufacture , integration , sustainment , support , and upgrade of advanced military aircraft , including combat and air mobility aircraft , unmanned air vehicles , and related technologies . aeronautics 2019 major programs include the f-35 lightning ii joint strike fighter , f-22 raptor , f-16 fighting falcon , c-130 hercules , and the c-5m super galaxy . aeronautics 2019 operating results included the following ( in millions ) : .
||2012|2011|2010|
|net sales|$ 14953|$ 14362|$ 13109|
|operating profit|1699|1630|1498|
|operating margins|11.4% ( 11.4 % )|11.3% ( 11.3 % )|11.4% ( 11.4 % )|
|backlog at year-end|30100|30500|27500|
2012 compared to 2011 aeronautics 2019 net sales for 2012 increased $ 591 million , or 4% ( 4 % ) , compared to 2011 . the increase was attributable to higher net sales of approximately $ 745 million from f-35 lrip contracts principally due to increased production volume ; about $ 285 million from f-16 programs primarily due to higher aircraft deliveries ( 37 f-16 aircraft delivered in 2012 compared to 22 in 2011 ) partially offset by lower volume on sustainment activities due to the completion of modification programs for certain international customers ; and approximately $ 140 million from c-5 programs due to higher aircraft deliveries ( four c-5m aircraft delivered in 2012 compared to two in 2011 ) . partially offsetting the increases were lower net sales of approximately $ 365 million from decreased production volume and lower risk retirements on the f-22 program as final aircraft deliveries were completed in the second quarter of 2012 ; approximately $ 110 million from the f-35 development contract primarily due to the inception-to-date effect of reducing the profit booking rate in the second quarter of 2012 and to a lesser extent lower volume ; and about $ 95 million from a decrease in volume on other sustainment activities partially offset by various other aeronautics programs due to higher volume . net sales for c-130 programs were comparable to 2011 as a decline in sustainment activities largely was offset by increased aircraft deliveries . aeronautics 2019 operating profit for 2012 increased $ 69 million , or 4% ( 4 % ) , compared to 2011 . the increase was attributable to higher operating profit of approximately $ 105 million from c-130 programs due to an increase in risk retirements ; about $ 50 million from f-16 programs due to higher aircraft deliveries partially offset by a decline in risk retirements ; approximately $ 50 million from f-35 lrip contracts due to increased production volume and risk retirements ; and about $ 50 million from the completion of purchased intangible asset amortization on certain f-16 contracts . partially offsetting the increases was lower operating profit of about $ 90 million from the f-35 development contract primarily due to the inception- to-date effect of reducing the profit booking rate in the second quarter of 2012 ; approximately $ 50 million from decreased production volume and risk retirements on the f-22 program partially offset by a resolution of a contractual matter in the second quarter of 2012 ; and approximately $ 45 million primarily due to a decrease in risk retirements on other sustainment activities partially offset by various other aeronautics programs due to increased risk retirements and volume . operating profit for c-5 programs was comparable to 2011 . adjustments not related to volume , including net profit booking rate adjustments and other matters described above , were approximately $ 30 million lower for 2012 compared to 2011 . 2011 compared to 2010 aeronautics 2019 net sales for 2011 increased $ 1.3 billion , or 10% ( 10 % ) , compared to 2010 . the growth in net sales primarily was due to higher volume of about $ 850 million for work performed on the f-35 lrip contracts as production increased ; higher volume of about $ 745 million for c-130 programs due to an increase in deliveries ( 33 c-130j aircraft delivered in 2011 compared to 25 during 2010 ) and support activities ; about $ 425 million for f-16 support activities and an increase in aircraft deliveries ( 22 f-16 aircraft delivered in 2011 compared to 20 during 2010 ) ; and approximately $ 90 million for higher volume on c-5 programs ( two c-5m aircraft delivered in 2011 compared to one during 2010 ) . these increases partially were offset by a decline in net sales of approximately $ 675 million due to lower volume on the f-22 program and lower net sales of about $ 155 million for the f-35 development contract as development work decreased. .
Question: what is the growth rate in operating profit for aeronautics in 2011? |
Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: devon energy corporation and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements 2013 ( continued ) proved undeveloped reserves the following table presents the changes in devon 2019s total proved undeveloped reserves during 2015 ( mmboe ) . .
||u.s .|canada|total|
|proved undeveloped reserves as of december 31 2014|305|384|689|
|extensions and discoveries|13|11|24|
|revisions due to prices|-115 ( 115 )|80|-35 ( 35 )|
|revisions other than price|-40 ( 40 )|-80 ( 80 )|-120 ( 120 )|
|conversion to proved developed reserves|-88 ( 88 )|-94 ( 94 )|-182 ( 182 )|
|proved undeveloped reserves as of december 31 2015|75|301|376|
proved undeveloped reserves decreased 45% ( 45 % ) from year-end 2014 to year-end 2015 , and the year-end 2015 balance represents 17% ( 17 % ) of total proved reserves . drilling and development activities increased devon 2019s proved undeveloped reserves 24 mmboe and resulted in the conversion of 182 mmboe , or 26% ( 26 % ) , of the 2014 proved undeveloped reserves to proved developed reserves . costs incurred to develop and convert devon 2019s proved undeveloped reserves were approximately $ 2.2 billion for 2015 . additionally , revisions other than price decreased devon 2019s proved undeveloped reserves 120 mmboe primarily due to evaluations of certain properties in the u.s . and canada . the largest revisions , which reduced reserves by 80 mmboe , relate to evaluations of jackfish bitumen reserves . of the 40 mmboe revisions recorded for u.s . properties , a reduction of approximately 27 mmboe represents reserves that devon now does not expect to develop in the next five years , including 20 mmboe attributable to the eagle ford . a significant amount of devon 2019s proved undeveloped reserves at the end of 2015 related to its jackfish operations . at december 31 , 2015 and 2014 , devon 2019s jackfish proved undeveloped reserves were 301 mmboe and 384 mmboe , respectively . development schedules for the jackfish reserves are primarily controlled by the need to keep the processing plants at their 35 mbbl daily facility capacity . processing plant capacity is controlled by factors such as total steam processing capacity and steam-oil ratios . furthermore , development of these projects involves the up-front construction of steam injection/distribution and bitumen processing facilities . due to the large up-front capital investments and large reserves required to provide economic returns , the project conditions meet the specific circumstances requiring a period greater than 5 years for conversion to developed reserves . as a result , these reserves are classified as proved undeveloped for more than five years . currently , the development schedule for these reserves extends through to 2030 . at the end of 2015 , approximately 184 mmboe of proved undeveloped reserves at jackfish have remained undeveloped for five years or more since the initial booking . no other projects have proved undeveloped reserves that have remained undeveloped more than five years from the initial booking of the reserves . furthermore , approximately 180 mmboe of proved undeveloped reserves at jackfish will require in excess of five years , from the date of this filing , to develop . price revisions 2015 2013 reserves decreased 302 mmboe primarily due to lower commodity prices across all products . the lower bitumen price increased canadian reserves due to the decline in royalties , which increases devon 2019s after- royalty volumes . 2014 2013 reserves increased 9 mmboe primarily due to higher gas prices in the barnett shale and the anadarko basin , partially offset by higher bitumen prices , which result in lower after-royalty volumes , in canada. .
Question: what was the total proved reserve amount for the year-end 2015? | 2211.76471 | ### Transformed FinQA Question Generation Instructions
#### Step 1: Analyze and Understand the Original FinQA Question
- Objective: Use the given FinQA question to generate a new, logically similar but numerically different question.
- Guidelines:
- Identify the financial concepts and quantitative reasoning in the original question.
- Determine the key variables (e.g., revenue, profit, growth rate, interest) and their relationships.
- Maintain the original question’s structure and complexity.
#### Step 2: Transform and Adapt
- Objective: Create a new FinQA-style question while modifying numerical values and conditions.
- Guidelines:
- Change financial figures, constraints, or business conditions to create a unique question.
- Ensure the transformation maintains financial realism (e.g., realistic market trends, interest rates).
- Retain the original reasoning and computational steps while introducing fresh data points.
#### Step 3: Generate the New FinQA Question
- Objective: Output an original, transformed FinQA question without providing an answer or solution.
- Guidelines:
- Ensure the new question aligns with FinQA’s format and complexity.
- Maintain clarity and well-defined financial relationships.
### Response Rule
- **Generate only the "Transformed FinQA Question" for the given example without including any answer, explanation, or solution.**
### Output Format
#### Transformed FinQA Question: [Write your transformed FinQA question here.]
----
#### Task
#### Original FinQA Question: Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: devon energy corporation and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements 2013 ( continued ) proved undeveloped reserves the following table presents the changes in devon 2019s total proved undeveloped reserves during 2015 ( mmboe ) . .
||u.s .|canada|total|
|proved undeveloped reserves as of december 31 2014|305|384|689|
|extensions and discoveries|13|11|24|
|revisions due to prices|-115 ( 115 )|80|-35 ( 35 )|
|revisions other than price|-40 ( 40 )|-80 ( 80 )|-120 ( 120 )|
|conversion to proved developed reserves|-88 ( 88 )|-94 ( 94 )|-182 ( 182 )|
|proved undeveloped reserves as of december 31 2015|75|301|376|
proved undeveloped reserves decreased 45% ( 45 % ) from year-end 2014 to year-end 2015 , and the year-end 2015 balance represents 17% ( 17 % ) of total proved reserves . drilling and development activities increased devon 2019s proved undeveloped reserves 24 mmboe and resulted in the conversion of 182 mmboe , or 26% ( 26 % ) , of the 2014 proved undeveloped reserves to proved developed reserves . costs incurred to develop and convert devon 2019s proved undeveloped reserves were approximately $ 2.2 billion for 2015 . additionally , revisions other than price decreased devon 2019s proved undeveloped reserves 120 mmboe primarily due to evaluations of certain properties in the u.s . and canada . the largest revisions , which reduced reserves by 80 mmboe , relate to evaluations of jackfish bitumen reserves . of the 40 mmboe revisions recorded for u.s . properties , a reduction of approximately 27 mmboe represents reserves that devon now does not expect to develop in the next five years , including 20 mmboe attributable to the eagle ford . a significant amount of devon 2019s proved undeveloped reserves at the end of 2015 related to its jackfish operations . at december 31 , 2015 and 2014 , devon 2019s jackfish proved undeveloped reserves were 301 mmboe and 384 mmboe , respectively . development schedules for the jackfish reserves are primarily controlled by the need to keep the processing plants at their 35 mbbl daily facility capacity . processing plant capacity is controlled by factors such as total steam processing capacity and steam-oil ratios . furthermore , development of these projects involves the up-front construction of steam injection/distribution and bitumen processing facilities . due to the large up-front capital investments and large reserves required to provide economic returns , the project conditions meet the specific circumstances requiring a period greater than 5 years for conversion to developed reserves . as a result , these reserves are classified as proved undeveloped for more than five years . currently , the development schedule for these reserves extends through to 2030 . at the end of 2015 , approximately 184 mmboe of proved undeveloped reserves at jackfish have remained undeveloped for five years or more since the initial booking . no other projects have proved undeveloped reserves that have remained undeveloped more than five years from the initial booking of the reserves . furthermore , approximately 180 mmboe of proved undeveloped reserves at jackfish will require in excess of five years , from the date of this filing , to develop . price revisions 2015 2013 reserves decreased 302 mmboe primarily due to lower commodity prices across all products . the lower bitumen price increased canadian reserves due to the decline in royalties , which increases devon 2019s after- royalty volumes . 2014 2013 reserves increased 9 mmboe primarily due to higher gas prices in the barnett shale and the anadarko basin , partially offset by higher bitumen prices , which result in lower after-royalty volumes , in canada. .
Question: what was the total proved reserve amount for the year-end 2015? |
Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: management 2019s discussion and analysis 158 jpmorgan chase & co./2012 annual report the following table summarizes the ratings profile by derivative counterparty of the firm 2019s derivative receivables , including credit derivatives , net of other liquid securities collateral , for the dates indicated . ratings profile of derivative receivables .
|rating equivalent december 31 ( in millions except ratios )|rating equivalent exposure net of all collateral|rating equivalent % ( % ) of exposure net of all collateral|exposure net of all collateral|% ( % ) of exposure net of all collateral|
|aaa/aaa to aa-/aa3|$ 20040|33% ( 33 % )|$ 25100|35% ( 35 % )|
|a+/a1 to a-/a3|12169|20|22942|32|
|bbb+/baa1 to bbb-/baa3|18197|29|9595|14|
|bb+/ba1 to b-/b3|9636|16|10545|15|
|ccc+/caa1 and below|1283|2|2488|4|
|total|$ 61325|100% ( 100 % )|$ 70670|100% ( 100 % )|
as noted above , the firm uses collateral agreements to mitigate counterparty credit risk . the percentage of the firm 2019s derivatives transactions subject to collateral agreements 2013 excluding foreign exchange spot trades , which are not typically covered by collateral agreements due to their short maturity 2013 was 88% ( 88 % ) as of december 31 , 2012 , unchanged compared with december 31 , 2011 . credit derivatives credit derivatives are financial instruments whose value is derived from the credit risk associated with the debt of a third party issuer ( the reference entity ) and which allow one party ( the protection purchaser ) to transfer that risk to another party ( the protection seller ) when the reference entity suffers a credit event . if no credit event has occurred , the protection seller makes no payments to the protection purchaser . for a more detailed description of credit derivatives , see credit derivatives in note 6 on pages 218 2013227 of this annual report . the firm uses credit derivatives for two primary purposes : first , in its capacity as a market-maker ; and second , as an end-user , to manage the firm 2019s own credit risk associated with various exposures . included in end-user activities are credit derivatives used to mitigate the credit risk associated with traditional lending activities ( loans and unfunded commitments ) and derivatives counterparty exposure in the firm 2019s wholesale businesses ( 201ccredit portfolio management 201d activities ) . information on credit portfolio management activities is provided in the table below . in addition , the firm uses credit derivatives as an end-user to manage other exposures , including credit risk arising from certain afs securities and from certain securities held in the firm 2019s market making businesses . these credit derivatives , as well as the synthetic credit portfolio , are not included in credit portfolio management activities ; for further information on these credit derivatives as well as credit derivatives used in the firm 2019s capacity as a market maker in credit derivatives , see credit derivatives in note 6 on pages 226 2013227 of this annual report. .
Question: what percentage of derivative receivables was junk rated in 2012? | 14.0 | ### Transformed FinQA Question Generation Instructions
#### Step 1: Analyze and Understand the Original FinQA Question
- Objective: Use the given FinQA question to generate a new, logically similar but numerically different question.
- Guidelines:
- Identify the financial concepts and quantitative reasoning in the original question.
- Determine the key variables (e.g., revenue, profit, growth rate, interest) and their relationships.
- Maintain the original question’s structure and complexity.
#### Step 2: Transform and Adapt
- Objective: Create a new FinQA-style question while modifying numerical values and conditions.
- Guidelines:
- Change financial figures, constraints, or business conditions to create a unique question.
- Ensure the transformation maintains financial realism (e.g., realistic market trends, interest rates).
- Retain the original reasoning and computational steps while introducing fresh data points.
#### Step 3: Generate the New FinQA Question
- Objective: Output an original, transformed FinQA question without providing an answer or solution.
- Guidelines:
- Ensure the new question aligns with FinQA’s format and complexity.
- Maintain clarity and well-defined financial relationships.
### Response Rule
- **Generate only the "Transformed FinQA Question" for the given example without including any answer, explanation, or solution.**
### Output Format
#### Transformed FinQA Question: [Write your transformed FinQA question here.]
----
#### Task
#### Original FinQA Question: Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: management 2019s discussion and analysis 158 jpmorgan chase & co./2012 annual report the following table summarizes the ratings profile by derivative counterparty of the firm 2019s derivative receivables , including credit derivatives , net of other liquid securities collateral , for the dates indicated . ratings profile of derivative receivables .
|rating equivalent december 31 ( in millions except ratios )|rating equivalent exposure net of all collateral|rating equivalent % ( % ) of exposure net of all collateral|exposure net of all collateral|% ( % ) of exposure net of all collateral|
|aaa/aaa to aa-/aa3|$ 20040|33% ( 33 % )|$ 25100|35% ( 35 % )|
|a+/a1 to a-/a3|12169|20|22942|32|
|bbb+/baa1 to bbb-/baa3|18197|29|9595|14|
|bb+/ba1 to b-/b3|9636|16|10545|15|
|ccc+/caa1 and below|1283|2|2488|4|
|total|$ 61325|100% ( 100 % )|$ 70670|100% ( 100 % )|
as noted above , the firm uses collateral agreements to mitigate counterparty credit risk . the percentage of the firm 2019s derivatives transactions subject to collateral agreements 2013 excluding foreign exchange spot trades , which are not typically covered by collateral agreements due to their short maturity 2013 was 88% ( 88 % ) as of december 31 , 2012 , unchanged compared with december 31 , 2011 . credit derivatives credit derivatives are financial instruments whose value is derived from the credit risk associated with the debt of a third party issuer ( the reference entity ) and which allow one party ( the protection purchaser ) to transfer that risk to another party ( the protection seller ) when the reference entity suffers a credit event . if no credit event has occurred , the protection seller makes no payments to the protection purchaser . for a more detailed description of credit derivatives , see credit derivatives in note 6 on pages 218 2013227 of this annual report . the firm uses credit derivatives for two primary purposes : first , in its capacity as a market-maker ; and second , as an end-user , to manage the firm 2019s own credit risk associated with various exposures . included in end-user activities are credit derivatives used to mitigate the credit risk associated with traditional lending activities ( loans and unfunded commitments ) and derivatives counterparty exposure in the firm 2019s wholesale businesses ( 201ccredit portfolio management 201d activities ) . information on credit portfolio management activities is provided in the table below . in addition , the firm uses credit derivatives as an end-user to manage other exposures , including credit risk arising from certain afs securities and from certain securities held in the firm 2019s market making businesses . these credit derivatives , as well as the synthetic credit portfolio , are not included in credit portfolio management activities ; for further information on these credit derivatives as well as credit derivatives used in the firm 2019s capacity as a market maker in credit derivatives , see credit derivatives in note 6 on pages 226 2013227 of this annual report. .
Question: what percentage of derivative receivables was junk rated in 2012? |
Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: 58 2016 annual report note 12 . business acquisition bayside business solutions , inc . effective july 1 , 2015 , the company acquired all of the equity interests of bayside business solutions , an alabama-based company that provides technology solutions and payment processing services primarily for the financial services industry , for $ 10000 paid in cash . this acquisition was funded using existing operating cash . the acquisition of bayside business solutions expanded the company 2019s presence in commercial lending within the industry . management has completed a purchase price allocation of bayside business solutions and its assessment of the fair value of acquired assets and liabilities assumed . the recognized amounts of identifiable assets acquired and liabilities assumed , based upon their fair values as of july 1 , 2015 are set forth below: .
|current assets|$ 1922|
|long-term assets|253|
|identifiable intangible assets|5005|
|total liabilities assumed|-3279 ( 3279 )|
|total identifiable net assets|3901|
|goodwill|6099|
|net assets acquired|$ 10000|
the goodwill of $ 6099 arising from this acquisition consists largely of the growth potential , synergies and economies of scale expected from combining the operations of the company with those of bayside business solutions , together with the value of bayside business solutions 2019 assembled workforce . goodwill from this acquisition has been allocated to our banking systems and services segment . the goodwill is not expected to be deductible for income tax purposes . identifiable intangible assets from this acquisition consist of customer relationships of $ 3402 , $ 659 of computer software and other intangible assets of $ 944 . the weighted average amortization period for acquired customer relationships , acquired computer software , and other intangible assets is 15 years , 5 years , and 20 years , respectively . current assets were inclusive of cash acquired of $ 1725 . the fair value of current assets acquired included accounts receivable of $ 178 . the gross amount of receivables was $ 178 , none of which was expected to be uncollectible . during fiscal year 2016 , the company incurred $ 55 in costs related to the acquisition of bayside business solutions . these costs included fees for legal , valuation and other fees . these costs were included within general and administrative expenses . the results of bayside business solutions 2019 operations included in the company 2019s consolidated statement of income for the twelve months ended june 30 , 2016 included revenue of $ 4273 and after-tax net income of $ 303 . the accompanying consolidated statements of income for the fiscal year ended june 30 , 2016 do not include any revenues and expenses related to this acquisition prior to the acquisition date . the impact of this acquisition was considered immaterial to both the current and prior periods of our consolidated financial statements and pro forma financial information has not been provided . banno , llc effective march 1 , 2014 , the company acquired all of the equity interests of banno , an iowa-based company that provides web and transaction marketing services with a focus on the mobile medium , for $ 27910 paid in cash . this acquisition was funded using existing operating cash . the acquisition of banno expanded the company 2019s presence in online and mobile technologies within the industry . during fiscal year 2014 , the company incurred $ 30 in costs related to the acquisition of banno . these costs included fees for legal , valuation and other fees . these costs were included within general and administrative expenses . the results of banno's operations included in the company's consolidated statements of income for the year ended june 30 , 2016 included revenue of $ 6393 and after-tax net loss of $ 1289 . for the year ended june 30 , 2015 , our consolidated statements of income included revenue of $ 4175 and after-tax net loss of $ 1784 attributable to banno . the results of banno 2019s operations included in the company 2019s consolidated statement of operations from the acquisition date to june 30 , 2014 included revenue of $ 848 and after-tax net loss of $ 1121 . the accompanying consolidated statements of income for the twelve month period ended june 30 , 2016 do not include any revenues and expenses related to this acquisition prior to the acquisition date . the impact of this acquisition was considered immaterial to both the current and prior periods of our consolidated financial statements and pro forma financial information has not been provided. .
Question: what percentage of the company's net assets are considered long-term assets? | 0.0253 | ### Transformed FinQA Question Generation Instructions
#### Step 1: Analyze and Understand the Original FinQA Question
- Objective: Use the given FinQA question to generate a new, logically similar but numerically different question.
- Guidelines:
- Identify the financial concepts and quantitative reasoning in the original question.
- Determine the key variables (e.g., revenue, profit, growth rate, interest) and their relationships.
- Maintain the original question’s structure and complexity.
#### Step 2: Transform and Adapt
- Objective: Create a new FinQA-style question while modifying numerical values and conditions.
- Guidelines:
- Change financial figures, constraints, or business conditions to create a unique question.
- Ensure the transformation maintains financial realism (e.g., realistic market trends, interest rates).
- Retain the original reasoning and computational steps while introducing fresh data points.
#### Step 3: Generate the New FinQA Question
- Objective: Output an original, transformed FinQA question without providing an answer or solution.
- Guidelines:
- Ensure the new question aligns with FinQA’s format and complexity.
- Maintain clarity and well-defined financial relationships.
### Response Rule
- **Generate only the "Transformed FinQA Question" for the given example without including any answer, explanation, or solution.**
### Output Format
#### Transformed FinQA Question: [Write your transformed FinQA question here.]
----
#### Task
#### Original FinQA Question: Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: 58 2016 annual report note 12 . business acquisition bayside business solutions , inc . effective july 1 , 2015 , the company acquired all of the equity interests of bayside business solutions , an alabama-based company that provides technology solutions and payment processing services primarily for the financial services industry , for $ 10000 paid in cash . this acquisition was funded using existing operating cash . the acquisition of bayside business solutions expanded the company 2019s presence in commercial lending within the industry . management has completed a purchase price allocation of bayside business solutions and its assessment of the fair value of acquired assets and liabilities assumed . the recognized amounts of identifiable assets acquired and liabilities assumed , based upon their fair values as of july 1 , 2015 are set forth below: .
|current assets|$ 1922|
|long-term assets|253|
|identifiable intangible assets|5005|
|total liabilities assumed|-3279 ( 3279 )|
|total identifiable net assets|3901|
|goodwill|6099|
|net assets acquired|$ 10000|
the goodwill of $ 6099 arising from this acquisition consists largely of the growth potential , synergies and economies of scale expected from combining the operations of the company with those of bayside business solutions , together with the value of bayside business solutions 2019 assembled workforce . goodwill from this acquisition has been allocated to our banking systems and services segment . the goodwill is not expected to be deductible for income tax purposes . identifiable intangible assets from this acquisition consist of customer relationships of $ 3402 , $ 659 of computer software and other intangible assets of $ 944 . the weighted average amortization period for acquired customer relationships , acquired computer software , and other intangible assets is 15 years , 5 years , and 20 years , respectively . current assets were inclusive of cash acquired of $ 1725 . the fair value of current assets acquired included accounts receivable of $ 178 . the gross amount of receivables was $ 178 , none of which was expected to be uncollectible . during fiscal year 2016 , the company incurred $ 55 in costs related to the acquisition of bayside business solutions . these costs included fees for legal , valuation and other fees . these costs were included within general and administrative expenses . the results of bayside business solutions 2019 operations included in the company 2019s consolidated statement of income for the twelve months ended june 30 , 2016 included revenue of $ 4273 and after-tax net income of $ 303 . the accompanying consolidated statements of income for the fiscal year ended june 30 , 2016 do not include any revenues and expenses related to this acquisition prior to the acquisition date . the impact of this acquisition was considered immaterial to both the current and prior periods of our consolidated financial statements and pro forma financial information has not been provided . banno , llc effective march 1 , 2014 , the company acquired all of the equity interests of banno , an iowa-based company that provides web and transaction marketing services with a focus on the mobile medium , for $ 27910 paid in cash . this acquisition was funded using existing operating cash . the acquisition of banno expanded the company 2019s presence in online and mobile technologies within the industry . during fiscal year 2014 , the company incurred $ 30 in costs related to the acquisition of banno . these costs included fees for legal , valuation and other fees . these costs were included within general and administrative expenses . the results of banno's operations included in the company's consolidated statements of income for the year ended june 30 , 2016 included revenue of $ 6393 and after-tax net loss of $ 1289 . for the year ended june 30 , 2015 , our consolidated statements of income included revenue of $ 4175 and after-tax net loss of $ 1784 attributable to banno . the results of banno 2019s operations included in the company 2019s consolidated statement of operations from the acquisition date to june 30 , 2014 included revenue of $ 848 and after-tax net loss of $ 1121 . the accompanying consolidated statements of income for the twelve month period ended june 30 , 2016 do not include any revenues and expenses related to this acquisition prior to the acquisition date . the impact of this acquisition was considered immaterial to both the current and prior periods of our consolidated financial statements and pro forma financial information has not been provided. .
Question: what percentage of the company's net assets are considered long-term assets? |
Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: table 46 : allowance for loan and lease losses .
|dollars in millions|2013|2012|
|january 1|$ 4036|$ 4347|
|total net charge-offs|-1077 ( 1077 )|-1289 ( 1289 )|
|provision for credit losses|643|987|
|net change in allowance for unfunded loan commitments and letters of credit|8|-10 ( 10 )|
|other|-1 ( 1 )|1|
|december 31|$ 3609|$ 4036|
|net charge-offs to average loans ( for the year ended ) ( a )|.57% ( .57 % )|.73% ( .73 % )|
|allowance for loan and lease losses to total loans|1.84|2.17|
|commercial lending net charge-offs|$ -249 ( 249 )|$ -359 ( 359 )|
|consumer lending net charge-offs|-828 ( 828 )|-930 ( 930 )|
|total net charge-offs|$ -1077 ( 1077 )|$ -1289 ( 1289 )|
|net charge-offs to average loans ( for the year ended )|||
|commercial lending|.22% ( .22 % )|.35% ( .35 % )|
|consumer lending ( a )|1.07|1.24|
( a ) includes charge-offs of $ 134 million taken pursuant to alignment with interagency guidance on practices for loans and lines of credit related to consumer lending in the first quarter of 2013 . the provision for credit losses totaled $ 643 million for 2013 compared to $ 987 million for 2012 . the primary driver of the decrease to the provision was improved overall credit quality , including improved commercial loan risk factors , lower consumer loan delinquencies and improvements in expected cash flows for our purchased impaired loans . for 2013 , the provision for commercial lending credit losses decreased by $ 102 million , or 74% ( 74 % ) , from 2012 . the provision for consumer lending credit losses decreased $ 242 million , or 29% ( 29 % ) , from 2012 . at december 31 , 2013 , total alll to total nonperforming loans was 117% ( 117 % ) . the comparable amount for december 31 , 2012 was 124% ( 124 % ) . these ratios are 72% ( 72 % ) and 79% ( 79 % ) , respectively , when excluding the $ 1.4 billion and $ 1.5 billion , respectively , of alll at december 31 , 2013 and december 31 , 2012 allocated to consumer loans and lines of credit not secured by residential real estate and purchased impaired loans . we have excluded consumer loans and lines of credit not secured by real estate as they are charged off after 120 to 180 days past due and not placed on nonperforming status . additionally , we have excluded purchased impaired loans as they are considered performing regardless of their delinquency status as interest is accreted based on our estimate of expected cash flows and additional allowance is recorded when these cash flows are below recorded investment . see table 35 within this credit risk management section for additional information . the alll balance increases or decreases across periods in relation to fluctuating risk factors , including asset quality trends , charge-offs and changes in aggregate portfolio balances . during 2013 , improving asset quality trends , including , but not limited to , delinquency status and improving economic conditions , realization of previously estimated losses through charge-offs , including the impact of alignment with interagency guidance and overall portfolio growth , combined to result in the alll balance declining $ .4 billion , or 11% ( 11 % ) to $ 3.6 billion as of december 31 , 2013 compared to december 31 , 2012 . see note 7 allowances for loan and lease losses and unfunded loan commitments and letters of credit and note 6 purchased loans in the notes to consolidated financial statements in item 8 of this report regarding changes in the alll and in the allowance for unfunded loan commitments and letters of credit . operational risk management operational risk is the risk of loss resulting from inadequate or failed internal processes or systems , human factors , or external events . this includes losses that may arise as a result of non- compliance with laws or regulations , failure to fulfill fiduciary responsibilities , as well as litigation or other legal actions . operational risk may occur in any of our business activities and manifests itself in various ways , including but not limited to : 2022 transaction processing errors , 2022 unauthorized transactions and fraud by employees or third parties , 2022 material disruption in business activities , 2022 system breaches and misuse of sensitive information , 2022 regulatory or governmental actions , fines or penalties , and 2022 significant legal expenses , judgments or settlements . pnc 2019s operational risk management is inclusive of technology risk management , compliance and business continuity risk . operational risk management focuses on balancing business needs , regulatory expectations and risk management priorities through an adaptive and proactive program that is designed to provide a strong governance model , sound and consistent risk management processes and transparent operational risk reporting across the enterprise . the pnc board determines the strategic approach to operational risk via establishment of the operational risk appetite and appropriate risk management structure . this includes establishment of risk metrics and limits and a reporting structure to identify , understand and manage operational risks . executive management has responsibility for operational risk management . the executive management team is responsible for monitoring significant risks , key controls and related issues through management reporting and a governance structure of risk committees and sub-committees . within risk management , operational risk management functions are responsible for developing and maintaining the 84 the pnc financial services group , inc . 2013 form 10-k .
Question: what was the percentage change in the allowance for loan and lease losses from 2012 to 2013 | -0.1058 | ### Transformed FinQA Question Generation Instructions
#### Step 1: Analyze and Understand the Original FinQA Question
- Objective: Use the given FinQA question to generate a new, logically similar but numerically different question.
- Guidelines:
- Identify the financial concepts and quantitative reasoning in the original question.
- Determine the key variables (e.g., revenue, profit, growth rate, interest) and their relationships.
- Maintain the original question’s structure and complexity.
#### Step 2: Transform and Adapt
- Objective: Create a new FinQA-style question while modifying numerical values and conditions.
- Guidelines:
- Change financial figures, constraints, or business conditions to create a unique question.
- Ensure the transformation maintains financial realism (e.g., realistic market trends, interest rates).
- Retain the original reasoning and computational steps while introducing fresh data points.
#### Step 3: Generate the New FinQA Question
- Objective: Output an original, transformed FinQA question without providing an answer or solution.
- Guidelines:
- Ensure the new question aligns with FinQA’s format and complexity.
- Maintain clarity and well-defined financial relationships.
### Response Rule
- **Generate only the "Transformed FinQA Question" for the given example without including any answer, explanation, or solution.**
### Output Format
#### Transformed FinQA Question: [Write your transformed FinQA question here.]
----
#### Task
#### Original FinQA Question: Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: table 46 : allowance for loan and lease losses .
|dollars in millions|2013|2012|
|january 1|$ 4036|$ 4347|
|total net charge-offs|-1077 ( 1077 )|-1289 ( 1289 )|
|provision for credit losses|643|987|
|net change in allowance for unfunded loan commitments and letters of credit|8|-10 ( 10 )|
|other|-1 ( 1 )|1|
|december 31|$ 3609|$ 4036|
|net charge-offs to average loans ( for the year ended ) ( a )|.57% ( .57 % )|.73% ( .73 % )|
|allowance for loan and lease losses to total loans|1.84|2.17|
|commercial lending net charge-offs|$ -249 ( 249 )|$ -359 ( 359 )|
|consumer lending net charge-offs|-828 ( 828 )|-930 ( 930 )|
|total net charge-offs|$ -1077 ( 1077 )|$ -1289 ( 1289 )|
|net charge-offs to average loans ( for the year ended )|||
|commercial lending|.22% ( .22 % )|.35% ( .35 % )|
|consumer lending ( a )|1.07|1.24|
( a ) includes charge-offs of $ 134 million taken pursuant to alignment with interagency guidance on practices for loans and lines of credit related to consumer lending in the first quarter of 2013 . the provision for credit losses totaled $ 643 million for 2013 compared to $ 987 million for 2012 . the primary driver of the decrease to the provision was improved overall credit quality , including improved commercial loan risk factors , lower consumer loan delinquencies and improvements in expected cash flows for our purchased impaired loans . for 2013 , the provision for commercial lending credit losses decreased by $ 102 million , or 74% ( 74 % ) , from 2012 . the provision for consumer lending credit losses decreased $ 242 million , or 29% ( 29 % ) , from 2012 . at december 31 , 2013 , total alll to total nonperforming loans was 117% ( 117 % ) . the comparable amount for december 31 , 2012 was 124% ( 124 % ) . these ratios are 72% ( 72 % ) and 79% ( 79 % ) , respectively , when excluding the $ 1.4 billion and $ 1.5 billion , respectively , of alll at december 31 , 2013 and december 31 , 2012 allocated to consumer loans and lines of credit not secured by residential real estate and purchased impaired loans . we have excluded consumer loans and lines of credit not secured by real estate as they are charged off after 120 to 180 days past due and not placed on nonperforming status . additionally , we have excluded purchased impaired loans as they are considered performing regardless of their delinquency status as interest is accreted based on our estimate of expected cash flows and additional allowance is recorded when these cash flows are below recorded investment . see table 35 within this credit risk management section for additional information . the alll balance increases or decreases across periods in relation to fluctuating risk factors , including asset quality trends , charge-offs and changes in aggregate portfolio balances . during 2013 , improving asset quality trends , including , but not limited to , delinquency status and improving economic conditions , realization of previously estimated losses through charge-offs , including the impact of alignment with interagency guidance and overall portfolio growth , combined to result in the alll balance declining $ .4 billion , or 11% ( 11 % ) to $ 3.6 billion as of december 31 , 2013 compared to december 31 , 2012 . see note 7 allowances for loan and lease losses and unfunded loan commitments and letters of credit and note 6 purchased loans in the notes to consolidated financial statements in item 8 of this report regarding changes in the alll and in the allowance for unfunded loan commitments and letters of credit . operational risk management operational risk is the risk of loss resulting from inadequate or failed internal processes or systems , human factors , or external events . this includes losses that may arise as a result of non- compliance with laws or regulations , failure to fulfill fiduciary responsibilities , as well as litigation or other legal actions . operational risk may occur in any of our business activities and manifests itself in various ways , including but not limited to : 2022 transaction processing errors , 2022 unauthorized transactions and fraud by employees or third parties , 2022 material disruption in business activities , 2022 system breaches and misuse of sensitive information , 2022 regulatory or governmental actions , fines or penalties , and 2022 significant legal expenses , judgments or settlements . pnc 2019s operational risk management is inclusive of technology risk management , compliance and business continuity risk . operational risk management focuses on balancing business needs , regulatory expectations and risk management priorities through an adaptive and proactive program that is designed to provide a strong governance model , sound and consistent risk management processes and transparent operational risk reporting across the enterprise . the pnc board determines the strategic approach to operational risk via establishment of the operational risk appetite and appropriate risk management structure . this includes establishment of risk metrics and limits and a reporting structure to identify , understand and manage operational risks . executive management has responsibility for operational risk management . the executive management team is responsible for monitoring significant risks , key controls and related issues through management reporting and a governance structure of risk committees and sub-committees . within risk management , operational risk management functions are responsible for developing and maintaining the 84 the pnc financial services group , inc . 2013 form 10-k .
Question: what was the percentage change in the allowance for loan and lease losses from 2012 to 2013 |
Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: part ii item 5 . market for registrant 2019s common equity , related stockholder matters and issuer purchases of equity securities . price range our common stock trades on the nasdaq global select market under the symbol 201cmktx 201d . the range of closing price information for our common stock , as reported by nasdaq , was as follows : on february 20 , 2015 , the last reported closing price of our common stock on the nasdaq global select market was $ 78.97 . holders there were 28 holders of record of our common stock as of february 20 , 2015 . dividend policy during 2014 , 2013 and 2012 , we paid quarterly cash dividends of $ 0.16 per share , $ 0.13 per share and $ 0.11 per share , respectively . on december 27 , 2012 , we paid a special cash dividend of $ 1.30 per share . in january 2015 , our board of directors approved a quarterly cash dividend of $ 0.20 per share payable on february 26 , 2015 to stockholders of record as of the close of business on february 12 , 2015 . any future declaration and payment of dividends will be at the sole discretion of our board of directors . the board of directors may take into account such matters as general business conditions , our financial results , capital requirements , contractual obligations , legal and regulatory restrictions on the payment of dividends to our stockholders or by our subsidiaries to their respective parent entities , and such other factors as the board of directors may deem relevant . recent sales of unregistered securities securities authorized for issuance under equity compensation plans please see the section entitled 201cequity compensation plan information 201d in item 12. .
|2014:|high|low|
|january 1 2014 to march 31 2014|$ 67.16|$ 57.99|
|april 1 2014 to june 30 2014|$ 59.65|$ 50.30|
|july 1 2014 to september 30 2014|$ 62.05|$ 47.50|
|october 1 2014 to december 31 2014|$ 73.25|$ 61.15|
|2013:|high|low|
|january 1 2013 to march 31 2013|$ 41.85|$ 34.79|
|april 1 2013 to june 30 2013|$ 47.80|$ 37.09|
|july 1 2013 to september 30 2013|$ 61.47|$ 47.59|
|october 1 2013 to december 31 2013|$ 70.60|$ 61.34|
.
Question: based on the above listed holders of common stock , what was the market value of mktx common stock on february 20 , 2015? | 2211.16 | ### Transformed FinQA Question Generation Instructions
#### Step 1: Analyze and Understand the Original FinQA Question
- Objective: Use the given FinQA question to generate a new, logically similar but numerically different question.
- Guidelines:
- Identify the financial concepts and quantitative reasoning in the original question.
- Determine the key variables (e.g., revenue, profit, growth rate, interest) and their relationships.
- Maintain the original question’s structure and complexity.
#### Step 2: Transform and Adapt
- Objective: Create a new FinQA-style question while modifying numerical values and conditions.
- Guidelines:
- Change financial figures, constraints, or business conditions to create a unique question.
- Ensure the transformation maintains financial realism (e.g., realistic market trends, interest rates).
- Retain the original reasoning and computational steps while introducing fresh data points.
#### Step 3: Generate the New FinQA Question
- Objective: Output an original, transformed FinQA question without providing an answer or solution.
- Guidelines:
- Ensure the new question aligns with FinQA’s format and complexity.
- Maintain clarity and well-defined financial relationships.
### Response Rule
- **Generate only the "Transformed FinQA Question" for the given example without including any answer, explanation, or solution.**
### Output Format
#### Transformed FinQA Question: [Write your transformed FinQA question here.]
----
#### Task
#### Original FinQA Question: Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: part ii item 5 . market for registrant 2019s common equity , related stockholder matters and issuer purchases of equity securities . price range our common stock trades on the nasdaq global select market under the symbol 201cmktx 201d . the range of closing price information for our common stock , as reported by nasdaq , was as follows : on february 20 , 2015 , the last reported closing price of our common stock on the nasdaq global select market was $ 78.97 . holders there were 28 holders of record of our common stock as of february 20 , 2015 . dividend policy during 2014 , 2013 and 2012 , we paid quarterly cash dividends of $ 0.16 per share , $ 0.13 per share and $ 0.11 per share , respectively . on december 27 , 2012 , we paid a special cash dividend of $ 1.30 per share . in january 2015 , our board of directors approved a quarterly cash dividend of $ 0.20 per share payable on february 26 , 2015 to stockholders of record as of the close of business on february 12 , 2015 . any future declaration and payment of dividends will be at the sole discretion of our board of directors . the board of directors may take into account such matters as general business conditions , our financial results , capital requirements , contractual obligations , legal and regulatory restrictions on the payment of dividends to our stockholders or by our subsidiaries to their respective parent entities , and such other factors as the board of directors may deem relevant . recent sales of unregistered securities securities authorized for issuance under equity compensation plans please see the section entitled 201cequity compensation plan information 201d in item 12. .
|2014:|high|low|
|january 1 2014 to march 31 2014|$ 67.16|$ 57.99|
|april 1 2014 to june 30 2014|$ 59.65|$ 50.30|
|july 1 2014 to september 30 2014|$ 62.05|$ 47.50|
|october 1 2014 to december 31 2014|$ 73.25|$ 61.15|
|2013:|high|low|
|january 1 2013 to march 31 2013|$ 41.85|$ 34.79|
|april 1 2013 to june 30 2013|$ 47.80|$ 37.09|
|july 1 2013 to september 30 2013|$ 61.47|$ 47.59|
|october 1 2013 to december 31 2013|$ 70.60|$ 61.34|
.
Question: based on the above listed holders of common stock , what was the market value of mktx common stock on february 20 , 2015? |
Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: part iii item 10 . directors , executive officers and corporate governance for the information required by this item 10 , other than information with respect to our executive officers contained at the end of item 1 of this report , see 201celection of directors , 201d 201cnominees for election to the board of directors , 201d 201ccorporate governance 201d and 201csection 16 ( a ) beneficial ownership reporting compliance , 201d in the proxy statement for our 2015 annual meeting , which information is incorporated herein by reference . the proxy statement for our 2015 annual meeting will be filed within 120 days of the close of our fiscal year . for the information required by this item 10 with respect to our executive officers , see part i of this report on pages 11 - 12 . item 11 . executive compensation for the information required by this item 11 , see 201cexecutive compensation , 201d 201ccompensation committee report on executive compensation 201d and 201ccompensation committee interlocks and insider participation 201d in the proxy statement for our 2015 annual meeting , which information is incorporated herein by reference . item 12 . security ownership of certain beneficial owners and management and related stockholder matters for the information required by this item 12 with respect to beneficial ownership of our common stock , see 201csecurity ownership of certain beneficial owners and management 201d in the proxy statement for our 2015 annual meeting , which information is incorporated herein by reference . the following table sets forth certain information as of december 31 , 2014 regarding our equity plans : plan category number of securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options , warrants and rights weighted-average exercise price of outstanding options , warrants and rights number of securities remaining available for future issuance under equity compensation plans ( excluding securities reflected in column ( a ) ( b ) ( c ) equity compensation plans approved by security holders 1233672 $ 75.93 4903018 item 13 . certain relationships and related transactions , and director independence for the information required by this item 13 , see 201ccertain transactions 201d and 201ccorporate governance 201d in the proxy statement for our 2015 annual meeting , which information is incorporated herein by reference . item 14 . principal accounting fees and services for the information required by this item 14 , see 201caudit and non-audit fees 201d and 201cpolicy on audit committee pre- approval of audit and non-audit services of independent registered public accounting firm 201d in the proxy statement for our 2015 annual meeting , which information is incorporated herein by reference. .
|plan category|number of securitiesto be issued uponexercise ofoutstanding options warrants and rights ( a ) ( b )|weighted-averageexercise price ofoutstanding options warrants and rights|number of securitiesremaining available forfuture issuance underequity compensationplans ( excludingsecurities reflected in column ( a ) ) ( c )|
|equity compensation plans approved by security holders|1233672|$ 75.93|4903018|
part iii item 10 . directors , executive officers and corporate governance for the information required by this item 10 , other than information with respect to our executive officers contained at the end of item 1 of this report , see 201celection of directors , 201d 201cnominees for election to the board of directors , 201d 201ccorporate governance 201d and 201csection 16 ( a ) beneficial ownership reporting compliance , 201d in the proxy statement for our 2015 annual meeting , which information is incorporated herein by reference . the proxy statement for our 2015 annual meeting will be filed within 120 days of the close of our fiscal year . for the information required by this item 10 with respect to our executive officers , see part i of this report on pages 11 - 12 . item 11 . executive compensation for the information required by this item 11 , see 201cexecutive compensation , 201d 201ccompensation committee report on executive compensation 201d and 201ccompensation committee interlocks and insider participation 201d in the proxy statement for our 2015 annual meeting , which information is incorporated herein by reference . item 12 . security ownership of certain beneficial owners and management and related stockholder matters for the information required by this item 12 with respect to beneficial ownership of our common stock , see 201csecurity ownership of certain beneficial owners and management 201d in the proxy statement for our 2015 annual meeting , which information is incorporated herein by reference . the following table sets forth certain information as of december 31 , 2014 regarding our equity plans : plan category number of securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options , warrants and rights weighted-average exercise price of outstanding options , warrants and rights number of securities remaining available for future issuance under equity compensation plans ( excluding securities reflected in column ( a ) ( b ) ( c ) equity compensation plans approved by security holders 1233672 $ 75.93 4903018 item 13 . certain relationships and related transactions , and director independence for the information required by this item 13 , see 201ccertain transactions 201d and 201ccorporate governance 201d in the proxy statement for our 2015 annual meeting , which information is incorporated herein by reference . item 14 . principal accounting fees and services for the information required by this item 14 , see 201caudit and non-audit fees 201d and 201cpolicy on audit committee pre- approval of audit and non-audit services of independent registered public accounting firm 201d in the proxy statement for our 2015 annual meeting , which information is incorporated herein by reference. .
Question: what portion of the total number of securities approved by the security holders remains available for future issuance? | 0.79897 | ### Transformed FinQA Question Generation Instructions
#### Step 1: Analyze and Understand the Original FinQA Question
- Objective: Use the given FinQA question to generate a new, logically similar but numerically different question.
- Guidelines:
- Identify the financial concepts and quantitative reasoning in the original question.
- Determine the key variables (e.g., revenue, profit, growth rate, interest) and their relationships.
- Maintain the original question’s structure and complexity.
#### Step 2: Transform and Adapt
- Objective: Create a new FinQA-style question while modifying numerical values and conditions.
- Guidelines:
- Change financial figures, constraints, or business conditions to create a unique question.
- Ensure the transformation maintains financial realism (e.g., realistic market trends, interest rates).
- Retain the original reasoning and computational steps while introducing fresh data points.
#### Step 3: Generate the New FinQA Question
- Objective: Output an original, transformed FinQA question without providing an answer or solution.
- Guidelines:
- Ensure the new question aligns with FinQA’s format and complexity.
- Maintain clarity and well-defined financial relationships.
### Response Rule
- **Generate only the "Transformed FinQA Question" for the given example without including any answer, explanation, or solution.**
### Output Format
#### Transformed FinQA Question: [Write your transformed FinQA question here.]
----
#### Task
#### Original FinQA Question: Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: part iii item 10 . directors , executive officers and corporate governance for the information required by this item 10 , other than information with respect to our executive officers contained at the end of item 1 of this report , see 201celection of directors , 201d 201cnominees for election to the board of directors , 201d 201ccorporate governance 201d and 201csection 16 ( a ) beneficial ownership reporting compliance , 201d in the proxy statement for our 2015 annual meeting , which information is incorporated herein by reference . the proxy statement for our 2015 annual meeting will be filed within 120 days of the close of our fiscal year . for the information required by this item 10 with respect to our executive officers , see part i of this report on pages 11 - 12 . item 11 . executive compensation for the information required by this item 11 , see 201cexecutive compensation , 201d 201ccompensation committee report on executive compensation 201d and 201ccompensation committee interlocks and insider participation 201d in the proxy statement for our 2015 annual meeting , which information is incorporated herein by reference . item 12 . security ownership of certain beneficial owners and management and related stockholder matters for the information required by this item 12 with respect to beneficial ownership of our common stock , see 201csecurity ownership of certain beneficial owners and management 201d in the proxy statement for our 2015 annual meeting , which information is incorporated herein by reference . the following table sets forth certain information as of december 31 , 2014 regarding our equity plans : plan category number of securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options , warrants and rights weighted-average exercise price of outstanding options , warrants and rights number of securities remaining available for future issuance under equity compensation plans ( excluding securities reflected in column ( a ) ( b ) ( c ) equity compensation plans approved by security holders 1233672 $ 75.93 4903018 item 13 . certain relationships and related transactions , and director independence for the information required by this item 13 , see 201ccertain transactions 201d and 201ccorporate governance 201d in the proxy statement for our 2015 annual meeting , which information is incorporated herein by reference . item 14 . principal accounting fees and services for the information required by this item 14 , see 201caudit and non-audit fees 201d and 201cpolicy on audit committee pre- approval of audit and non-audit services of independent registered public accounting firm 201d in the proxy statement for our 2015 annual meeting , which information is incorporated herein by reference. .
|plan category|number of securitiesto be issued uponexercise ofoutstanding options warrants and rights ( a ) ( b )|weighted-averageexercise price ofoutstanding options warrants and rights|number of securitiesremaining available forfuture issuance underequity compensationplans ( excludingsecurities reflected in column ( a ) ) ( c )|
|equity compensation plans approved by security holders|1233672|$ 75.93|4903018|
part iii item 10 . directors , executive officers and corporate governance for the information required by this item 10 , other than information with respect to our executive officers contained at the end of item 1 of this report , see 201celection of directors , 201d 201cnominees for election to the board of directors , 201d 201ccorporate governance 201d and 201csection 16 ( a ) beneficial ownership reporting compliance , 201d in the proxy statement for our 2015 annual meeting , which information is incorporated herein by reference . the proxy statement for our 2015 annual meeting will be filed within 120 days of the close of our fiscal year . for the information required by this item 10 with respect to our executive officers , see part i of this report on pages 11 - 12 . item 11 . executive compensation for the information required by this item 11 , see 201cexecutive compensation , 201d 201ccompensation committee report on executive compensation 201d and 201ccompensation committee interlocks and insider participation 201d in the proxy statement for our 2015 annual meeting , which information is incorporated herein by reference . item 12 . security ownership of certain beneficial owners and management and related stockholder matters for the information required by this item 12 with respect to beneficial ownership of our common stock , see 201csecurity ownership of certain beneficial owners and management 201d in the proxy statement for our 2015 annual meeting , which information is incorporated herein by reference . the following table sets forth certain information as of december 31 , 2014 regarding our equity plans : plan category number of securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options , warrants and rights weighted-average exercise price of outstanding options , warrants and rights number of securities remaining available for future issuance under equity compensation plans ( excluding securities reflected in column ( a ) ( b ) ( c ) equity compensation plans approved by security holders 1233672 $ 75.93 4903018 item 13 . certain relationships and related transactions , and director independence for the information required by this item 13 , see 201ccertain transactions 201d and 201ccorporate governance 201d in the proxy statement for our 2015 annual meeting , which information is incorporated herein by reference . item 14 . principal accounting fees and services for the information required by this item 14 , see 201caudit and non-audit fees 201d and 201cpolicy on audit committee pre- approval of audit and non-audit services of independent registered public accounting firm 201d in the proxy statement for our 2015 annual meeting , which information is incorporated herein by reference. .
Question: what portion of the total number of securities approved by the security holders remains available for future issuance? |
Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: management 2019s discussion and analysis investing & lending investing & lending includes our investing activities and the origination of loans to provide financing to clients . these investments and loans are typically longer-term in nature . we make investments , some of which are consolidated , directly and indirectly through funds that we manage , in debt securities and loans , public and private equity securities , and real estate entities . the table below presents the operating results of our investing & lending segment. .
|$ in millions|year ended december 2014|year ended december 2013|year ended december 2012|
|equity securities|$ 3813|$ 3930|$ 2800|
|debt securities and loans|2165|1947|1850|
|other1|847|1141|1241|
|total net revenues|6825|7018|5891|
|operating expenses|2819|2686|2668|
|pre-tax earnings|$ 4006|$ 4332|$ 3223|
1 . includes net revenues of $ 325 million for 2014 , $ 329 million for 2013 and $ 362 million for 2012 related to metro international trade services llc . we completed the sale of this consolidated investment in december 2014 . 2014 versus 2013 . net revenues in investing & lending were $ 6.83 billion for 2014 , 3% ( 3 % ) lower than 2013 . net gains from investments in equity securities were slightly lower due to a significant decrease in net gains from investments in public equities , as movements in global equity prices during 2014 were less favorable compared with 2013 , partially offset by an increase in net gains from investments in private equities , primarily driven by company-specific events . net revenues from debt securities and loans were higher than 2013 , reflecting a significant increase in net interest income , primarily driven by increased lending , and a slight increase in net gains , primarily due to sales of certain investments during 2014 . other net revenues , related to our consolidated investments , were significantly lower compared with 2013 , reflecting a decrease in operating revenues from commodities-related consolidated investments . during 2014 , net revenues in investing & lending generally reflected favorable company-specific events , including initial public offerings and financings , and strong corporate performance , as well as net gains from sales of certain investments . however , concerns about the outlook for the global economy and uncertainty over the impact of financial regulatory reform continue to be meaningful considerations for the global marketplace . if equity markets decline or credit spreads widen , net revenues in investing & lending would likely be negatively impacted . operating expenses were $ 2.82 billion for 2014 , 5% ( 5 % ) higher than 2013 , reflecting higher compensation and benefits expenses , partially offset by lower expenses related to consolidated investments . pre-tax earnings were $ 4.01 billion in 2014 , 8% ( 8 % ) lower than 2013 . 2013 versus 2012 . net revenues in investing & lending were $ 7.02 billion for 2013 , 19% ( 19 % ) higher than 2012 , reflecting a significant increase in net gains from investments in equity securities , driven by company-specific events and stronger corporate performance , as well as significantly higher global equity prices . in addition , net gains and net interest income from debt securities and loans were slightly higher , while other net revenues , related to our consolidated investments , were lower compared with 2012 . during 2013 , net revenues in investing & lending generally reflected favorable company-specific events and strong corporate performance , as well as the impact of significantly higher global equity prices and tighter corporate credit spreads . operating expenses were $ 2.69 billion for 2013 , essentially unchanged compared with 2012 . operating expenses during 2013 included lower impairment charges and lower operating expenses related to consolidated investments , partially offset by increased compensation and benefits expenses due to higher net revenues compared with 2012 . pre-tax earnings were $ 4.33 billion in 2013 , 34% ( 34 % ) higher than 2012 . goldman sachs 2014 annual report 45 .
Question: in 2013 what percentage of total net revenues for the investing & lending segment were due to debt securities and loans? | 0.27743 | ### Transformed FinQA Question Generation Instructions
#### Step 1: Analyze and Understand the Original FinQA Question
- Objective: Use the given FinQA question to generate a new, logically similar but numerically different question.
- Guidelines:
- Identify the financial concepts and quantitative reasoning in the original question.
- Determine the key variables (e.g., revenue, profit, growth rate, interest) and their relationships.
- Maintain the original question’s structure and complexity.
#### Step 2: Transform and Adapt
- Objective: Create a new FinQA-style question while modifying numerical values and conditions.
- Guidelines:
- Change financial figures, constraints, or business conditions to create a unique question.
- Ensure the transformation maintains financial realism (e.g., realistic market trends, interest rates).
- Retain the original reasoning and computational steps while introducing fresh data points.
#### Step 3: Generate the New FinQA Question
- Objective: Output an original, transformed FinQA question without providing an answer or solution.
- Guidelines:
- Ensure the new question aligns with FinQA’s format and complexity.
- Maintain clarity and well-defined financial relationships.
### Response Rule
- **Generate only the "Transformed FinQA Question" for the given example without including any answer, explanation, or solution.**
### Output Format
#### Transformed FinQA Question: [Write your transformed FinQA question here.]
----
#### Task
#### Original FinQA Question: Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: management 2019s discussion and analysis investing & lending investing & lending includes our investing activities and the origination of loans to provide financing to clients . these investments and loans are typically longer-term in nature . we make investments , some of which are consolidated , directly and indirectly through funds that we manage , in debt securities and loans , public and private equity securities , and real estate entities . the table below presents the operating results of our investing & lending segment. .
|$ in millions|year ended december 2014|year ended december 2013|year ended december 2012|
|equity securities|$ 3813|$ 3930|$ 2800|
|debt securities and loans|2165|1947|1850|
|other1|847|1141|1241|
|total net revenues|6825|7018|5891|
|operating expenses|2819|2686|2668|
|pre-tax earnings|$ 4006|$ 4332|$ 3223|
1 . includes net revenues of $ 325 million for 2014 , $ 329 million for 2013 and $ 362 million for 2012 related to metro international trade services llc . we completed the sale of this consolidated investment in december 2014 . 2014 versus 2013 . net revenues in investing & lending were $ 6.83 billion for 2014 , 3% ( 3 % ) lower than 2013 . net gains from investments in equity securities were slightly lower due to a significant decrease in net gains from investments in public equities , as movements in global equity prices during 2014 were less favorable compared with 2013 , partially offset by an increase in net gains from investments in private equities , primarily driven by company-specific events . net revenues from debt securities and loans were higher than 2013 , reflecting a significant increase in net interest income , primarily driven by increased lending , and a slight increase in net gains , primarily due to sales of certain investments during 2014 . other net revenues , related to our consolidated investments , were significantly lower compared with 2013 , reflecting a decrease in operating revenues from commodities-related consolidated investments . during 2014 , net revenues in investing & lending generally reflected favorable company-specific events , including initial public offerings and financings , and strong corporate performance , as well as net gains from sales of certain investments . however , concerns about the outlook for the global economy and uncertainty over the impact of financial regulatory reform continue to be meaningful considerations for the global marketplace . if equity markets decline or credit spreads widen , net revenues in investing & lending would likely be negatively impacted . operating expenses were $ 2.82 billion for 2014 , 5% ( 5 % ) higher than 2013 , reflecting higher compensation and benefits expenses , partially offset by lower expenses related to consolidated investments . pre-tax earnings were $ 4.01 billion in 2014 , 8% ( 8 % ) lower than 2013 . 2013 versus 2012 . net revenues in investing & lending were $ 7.02 billion for 2013 , 19% ( 19 % ) higher than 2012 , reflecting a significant increase in net gains from investments in equity securities , driven by company-specific events and stronger corporate performance , as well as significantly higher global equity prices . in addition , net gains and net interest income from debt securities and loans were slightly higher , while other net revenues , related to our consolidated investments , were lower compared with 2012 . during 2013 , net revenues in investing & lending generally reflected favorable company-specific events and strong corporate performance , as well as the impact of significantly higher global equity prices and tighter corporate credit spreads . operating expenses were $ 2.69 billion for 2013 , essentially unchanged compared with 2012 . operating expenses during 2013 included lower impairment charges and lower operating expenses related to consolidated investments , partially offset by increased compensation and benefits expenses due to higher net revenues compared with 2012 . pre-tax earnings were $ 4.33 billion in 2013 , 34% ( 34 % ) higher than 2012 . goldman sachs 2014 annual report 45 .
Question: in 2013 what percentage of total net revenues for the investing & lending segment were due to debt securities and loans? |
Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: changes in the benchmark index component of the 10-year treasury yield . the company def signated these derivatives as cash flow hedges . on october 13 , 2015 , in conjunction with the pricing of the $ 4.5 billion senior notes , the companyr terminated these treasury lock contracts for a cash settlement payment of $ 16 million , which was recorded as a component of other comprehensive earnings and will be reclassified as an adjustment to interest expense over the ten years during which the related interest payments that were hedged will be recognized in income . foreign currency risk we are exposed to foreign currency risks that arise from normal business operations . these risks include the translation of local currency balances of foreign subsidiaries , transaction gains and losses associated with intercompany loans with foreign subsidiaries and transactions denominated in currencies other than a location's functional currency . we manage the exposure to these risks through a combination of normal operating activities and the use of foreign currency forward contracts . contracts are denominated in currtt encies of major industrial countries . our exposure to foreign currency exchange risks generally arises from our non-u.s . operations , to the extent they are conducted ind local currency . changes in foreign currency exchange rates affect translations of revenues denominated in currencies other than the u.s . dollar . during the years ended december 31 , 2016 , 2015 and 2014 , we generated approximately $ 1909 million , $ 1336 million and $ 1229 million , respectively , in revenues denominated in currencies other than the u.s . dollar . the major currencies to which our revenues are exposed are the brazilian real , the euro , the british pound sterling and the indian rupee . a 10% ( 10 % ) move in average exchange rates for these currencies ( assuming a simultaneous and immediate 10% ( 10 % ) change in all of such rates for the relevant period ) would have resulted in the following increase or ( decrease ) in our reported revenues for the years ended december 31 , 2016 , 2015 and 2014 ( in millions ) : .
|currency|2016|2015|2014|
|pound sterling|$ 47|$ 34|$ 31|
|euro|38|33|30|
|real|32|29|38|
|indian rupee|12|10|8|
|total impact|$ 129|$ 106|$ 107|
while our results of operations have been impacted by the effects of currency fluctuations , our international operations' revenues and expenses are generally denominated in local currency , which reduces our economic exposure to foreign exchange risk in those jurisdictions . revenues included $ 100 million and $ 243 million and net earnings included $ 10 million , anrr d $ 31 million , respectively , of unfavorable foreign currency impact during 2016 and 2015 resulting from a stronger u.s . dollar during these years compared to thet preceding year . in 2017 , we expect continued unfavorable foreign currency impact on our operating income resulting from the continued strengthening of the u.s . dollar vs . other currencies . our foreign exchange risk management policy permits the use of derivative instruments , such as forward contracts and options , to reduce volatility in our results of operations and/or cash flows resulting from foreign exchange rate fluctuations . we do not enter into foreign currency derivative instruments for trading purposes or to engage in speculative activitr y . we do periodically enter inttt o foreign currency forward exchange contracts to hedge foreign currency exposure to intercompany loans . as of december 31 , 2016 , the notional amount of these derivatives was approximately $ 143 million and the fair value was nominal . these derivatives are intended to hedge the foreign exchange risks related to intercompany loans but have not been designated as hedges for accounting purposes . we also use currency forward contracts to manage our exposure to fluctuations in costs caused by variations in indian rupee ( "inr" ) exchange rates . as of december 31 , 2016 , the notional amount of these derivatives was approximately $ 7 million and the fair value was ll less than $ 1 million . these inr forward contracts are designated as cash flow hedges . the fair value of these currency forward contracts is determined using currency exchange market rates , obtained from reliable , independent , third m party banks , at the balance sheet date . the fair value of forward contracts is subject to changes in currency exchange rates . the company has no ineffectiveness related to its use of currency forward contracts in connection with inr cash flow hedges . in conjunction with entering into the definitive agreement to acquire clear2pay in september 2014 , we initiated a foreign currency forward contract to purchase euros and sell u.s . dollars to manage the risk arising from fluctuations in exchange rates until the closing because the purchase price was stated in euros . as this derivative did not qualify for hedge accounting , we recorded a charge of $ 16 million in other income ( expense ) , net during the third quarter of 2014 . this forward contract was settled on october 1 , 2014. .
Question: what is the unfavorable foreign currency impact in operating expenses in 2015? | 212.0 | ### Transformed FinQA Question Generation Instructions
#### Step 1: Analyze and Understand the Original FinQA Question
- Objective: Use the given FinQA question to generate a new, logically similar but numerically different question.
- Guidelines:
- Identify the financial concepts and quantitative reasoning in the original question.
- Determine the key variables (e.g., revenue, profit, growth rate, interest) and their relationships.
- Maintain the original question’s structure and complexity.
#### Step 2: Transform and Adapt
- Objective: Create a new FinQA-style question while modifying numerical values and conditions.
- Guidelines:
- Change financial figures, constraints, or business conditions to create a unique question.
- Ensure the transformation maintains financial realism (e.g., realistic market trends, interest rates).
- Retain the original reasoning and computational steps while introducing fresh data points.
#### Step 3: Generate the New FinQA Question
- Objective: Output an original, transformed FinQA question without providing an answer or solution.
- Guidelines:
- Ensure the new question aligns with FinQA’s format and complexity.
- Maintain clarity and well-defined financial relationships.
### Response Rule
- **Generate only the "Transformed FinQA Question" for the given example without including any answer, explanation, or solution.**
### Output Format
#### Transformed FinQA Question: [Write your transformed FinQA question here.]
----
#### Task
#### Original FinQA Question: Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: changes in the benchmark index component of the 10-year treasury yield . the company def signated these derivatives as cash flow hedges . on october 13 , 2015 , in conjunction with the pricing of the $ 4.5 billion senior notes , the companyr terminated these treasury lock contracts for a cash settlement payment of $ 16 million , which was recorded as a component of other comprehensive earnings and will be reclassified as an adjustment to interest expense over the ten years during which the related interest payments that were hedged will be recognized in income . foreign currency risk we are exposed to foreign currency risks that arise from normal business operations . these risks include the translation of local currency balances of foreign subsidiaries , transaction gains and losses associated with intercompany loans with foreign subsidiaries and transactions denominated in currencies other than a location's functional currency . we manage the exposure to these risks through a combination of normal operating activities and the use of foreign currency forward contracts . contracts are denominated in currtt encies of major industrial countries . our exposure to foreign currency exchange risks generally arises from our non-u.s . operations , to the extent they are conducted ind local currency . changes in foreign currency exchange rates affect translations of revenues denominated in currencies other than the u.s . dollar . during the years ended december 31 , 2016 , 2015 and 2014 , we generated approximately $ 1909 million , $ 1336 million and $ 1229 million , respectively , in revenues denominated in currencies other than the u.s . dollar . the major currencies to which our revenues are exposed are the brazilian real , the euro , the british pound sterling and the indian rupee . a 10% ( 10 % ) move in average exchange rates for these currencies ( assuming a simultaneous and immediate 10% ( 10 % ) change in all of such rates for the relevant period ) would have resulted in the following increase or ( decrease ) in our reported revenues for the years ended december 31 , 2016 , 2015 and 2014 ( in millions ) : .
|currency|2016|2015|2014|
|pound sterling|$ 47|$ 34|$ 31|
|euro|38|33|30|
|real|32|29|38|
|indian rupee|12|10|8|
|total impact|$ 129|$ 106|$ 107|
while our results of operations have been impacted by the effects of currency fluctuations , our international operations' revenues and expenses are generally denominated in local currency , which reduces our economic exposure to foreign exchange risk in those jurisdictions . revenues included $ 100 million and $ 243 million and net earnings included $ 10 million , anrr d $ 31 million , respectively , of unfavorable foreign currency impact during 2016 and 2015 resulting from a stronger u.s . dollar during these years compared to thet preceding year . in 2017 , we expect continued unfavorable foreign currency impact on our operating income resulting from the continued strengthening of the u.s . dollar vs . other currencies . our foreign exchange risk management policy permits the use of derivative instruments , such as forward contracts and options , to reduce volatility in our results of operations and/or cash flows resulting from foreign exchange rate fluctuations . we do not enter into foreign currency derivative instruments for trading purposes or to engage in speculative activitr y . we do periodically enter inttt o foreign currency forward exchange contracts to hedge foreign currency exposure to intercompany loans . as of december 31 , 2016 , the notional amount of these derivatives was approximately $ 143 million and the fair value was nominal . these derivatives are intended to hedge the foreign exchange risks related to intercompany loans but have not been designated as hedges for accounting purposes . we also use currency forward contracts to manage our exposure to fluctuations in costs caused by variations in indian rupee ( "inr" ) exchange rates . as of december 31 , 2016 , the notional amount of these derivatives was approximately $ 7 million and the fair value was ll less than $ 1 million . these inr forward contracts are designated as cash flow hedges . the fair value of these currency forward contracts is determined using currency exchange market rates , obtained from reliable , independent , third m party banks , at the balance sheet date . the fair value of forward contracts is subject to changes in currency exchange rates . the company has no ineffectiveness related to its use of currency forward contracts in connection with inr cash flow hedges . in conjunction with entering into the definitive agreement to acquire clear2pay in september 2014 , we initiated a foreign currency forward contract to purchase euros and sell u.s . dollars to manage the risk arising from fluctuations in exchange rates until the closing because the purchase price was stated in euros . as this derivative did not qualify for hedge accounting , we recorded a charge of $ 16 million in other income ( expense ) , net during the third quarter of 2014 . this forward contract was settled on october 1 , 2014. .
Question: what is the unfavorable foreign currency impact in operating expenses in 2015? |
Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: notes to the consolidated financial statements union pacific corporation and subsidiary companies for purposes of this report , unless the context otherwise requires , all references herein to the 201ccorporation 201d , 201cupc 201d , 201cwe 201d , 201cus 201d , and 201cour 201d mean union pacific corporation and its subsidiaries , including union pacific railroad company , which will be separately referred to herein as 201cuprr 201d or the 201crailroad 201d . 1 . nature of operations operations and segmentation 2013 we are a class i railroad that operates in the u.s . our network includes 31898 route miles , linking pacific coast and gulf coast ports with the midwest and eastern u.s . gateways and providing several corridors to key mexican gateways . we own 26027 miles and operate on the remainder pursuant to trackage rights or leases . we serve the western two-thirds of the country and maintain coordinated schedules with other rail carriers for the handling of freight to and from the atlantic coast , the pacific coast , the southeast , the southwest , canada , and mexico . export and import traffic is moved through gulf coast and pacific coast ports and across the mexican and canadian borders . the railroad , along with its subsidiaries and rail affiliates , is our one reportable operating segment . although revenue is analyzed by commodity group , we analyze the net financial results of the railroad as one segment due to the integrated nature of our rail network . the following table provides freight revenue by commodity group : millions 2011 2010 2009 .
|millions|2011|2010|2009|
|agricultural|$ 3324|$ 3018|$ 2666|
|automotive|1510|1271|854|
|chemicals|2815|2425|2102|
|energy|4084|3489|3118|
|industrial products|3166|2639|2147|
|intermodal|3609|3227|2486|
|total freight revenues|$ 18508|$ 16069|$ 13373|
|other revenues|1049|896|770|
|total operatingrevenues|$ 19557|$ 16965|$ 14143|
although our revenues are principally derived from customers domiciled in the u.s. , the ultimate points of origination or destination for some products transported by us are outside the u.s . basis of presentation 2013 the consolidated financial statements are presented in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the u.s . ( gaap ) as codified in the financial accounting standards board ( fasb ) accounting standards codification ( asc ) . certain prior year amounts have been disaggregated to provide more detail and conform to the current period financial statement presentation . 2 . significant accounting policies principles of consolidation 2013 the consolidated financial statements include the accounts of union pacific corporation and all of its subsidiaries . investments in affiliated companies ( 20% ( 20 % ) to 50% ( 50 % ) owned ) are accounted for using the equity method of accounting . all intercompany transactions are eliminated . we currently have no less than majority-owned investments that require consolidation under variable interest entity requirements . cash and cash equivalents 2013 cash equivalents consist of investments with original maturities of three months or less . accounts receivable 2013 accounts receivable includes receivables reduced by an allowance for doubtful accounts . the allowance is based upon historical losses , credit worthiness of customers , and current economic conditions . receivables not expected to be collected in one year and the associated allowances are classified as other assets in our consolidated statements of financial position. .
Question: using a three year averageintermodal was what percent of total revenue? | 0.19441 | ### Transformed FinQA Question Generation Instructions
#### Step 1: Analyze and Understand the Original FinQA Question
- Objective: Use the given FinQA question to generate a new, logically similar but numerically different question.
- Guidelines:
- Identify the financial concepts and quantitative reasoning in the original question.
- Determine the key variables (e.g., revenue, profit, growth rate, interest) and their relationships.
- Maintain the original question’s structure and complexity.
#### Step 2: Transform and Adapt
- Objective: Create a new FinQA-style question while modifying numerical values and conditions.
- Guidelines:
- Change financial figures, constraints, or business conditions to create a unique question.
- Ensure the transformation maintains financial realism (e.g., realistic market trends, interest rates).
- Retain the original reasoning and computational steps while introducing fresh data points.
#### Step 3: Generate the New FinQA Question
- Objective: Output an original, transformed FinQA question without providing an answer or solution.
- Guidelines:
- Ensure the new question aligns with FinQA’s format and complexity.
- Maintain clarity and well-defined financial relationships.
### Response Rule
- **Generate only the "Transformed FinQA Question" for the given example without including any answer, explanation, or solution.**
### Output Format
#### Transformed FinQA Question: [Write your transformed FinQA question here.]
----
#### Task
#### Original FinQA Question: Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: notes to the consolidated financial statements union pacific corporation and subsidiary companies for purposes of this report , unless the context otherwise requires , all references herein to the 201ccorporation 201d , 201cupc 201d , 201cwe 201d , 201cus 201d , and 201cour 201d mean union pacific corporation and its subsidiaries , including union pacific railroad company , which will be separately referred to herein as 201cuprr 201d or the 201crailroad 201d . 1 . nature of operations operations and segmentation 2013 we are a class i railroad that operates in the u.s . our network includes 31898 route miles , linking pacific coast and gulf coast ports with the midwest and eastern u.s . gateways and providing several corridors to key mexican gateways . we own 26027 miles and operate on the remainder pursuant to trackage rights or leases . we serve the western two-thirds of the country and maintain coordinated schedules with other rail carriers for the handling of freight to and from the atlantic coast , the pacific coast , the southeast , the southwest , canada , and mexico . export and import traffic is moved through gulf coast and pacific coast ports and across the mexican and canadian borders . the railroad , along with its subsidiaries and rail affiliates , is our one reportable operating segment . although revenue is analyzed by commodity group , we analyze the net financial results of the railroad as one segment due to the integrated nature of our rail network . the following table provides freight revenue by commodity group : millions 2011 2010 2009 .
|millions|2011|2010|2009|
|agricultural|$ 3324|$ 3018|$ 2666|
|automotive|1510|1271|854|
|chemicals|2815|2425|2102|
|energy|4084|3489|3118|
|industrial products|3166|2639|2147|
|intermodal|3609|3227|2486|
|total freight revenues|$ 18508|$ 16069|$ 13373|
|other revenues|1049|896|770|
|total operatingrevenues|$ 19557|$ 16965|$ 14143|
although our revenues are principally derived from customers domiciled in the u.s. , the ultimate points of origination or destination for some products transported by us are outside the u.s . basis of presentation 2013 the consolidated financial statements are presented in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the u.s . ( gaap ) as codified in the financial accounting standards board ( fasb ) accounting standards codification ( asc ) . certain prior year amounts have been disaggregated to provide more detail and conform to the current period financial statement presentation . 2 . significant accounting policies principles of consolidation 2013 the consolidated financial statements include the accounts of union pacific corporation and all of its subsidiaries . investments in affiliated companies ( 20% ( 20 % ) to 50% ( 50 % ) owned ) are accounted for using the equity method of accounting . all intercompany transactions are eliminated . we currently have no less than majority-owned investments that require consolidation under variable interest entity requirements . cash and cash equivalents 2013 cash equivalents consist of investments with original maturities of three months or less . accounts receivable 2013 accounts receivable includes receivables reduced by an allowance for doubtful accounts . the allowance is based upon historical losses , credit worthiness of customers , and current economic conditions . receivables not expected to be collected in one year and the associated allowances are classified as other assets in our consolidated statements of financial position. .
Question: using a three year averageintermodal was what percent of total revenue? |
Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: 14 . leases we lease certain locomotives , freight cars , and other property . the consolidated statement of financial position as of december 31 , 2009 and 2008 included $ 2754 million , net of $ 927 million of accumulated depreciation , and $ 2024 million , net of $ 869 million of accumulated depreciation , respectively , for properties held under capital leases . a charge to income resulting from the depreciation for assets held under capital leases is included within depreciation expense in our consolidated statements of income . future minimum lease payments for operating and capital leases with initial or remaining non-cancelable lease terms in excess of one year as of december 31 , 2009 were as follows : millions of dollars operating leases capital leases .
|millions of dollars|operatingleases|capital leases|
|2010|$ 576|$ 290|
|2011|570|292|
|2012|488|247|
|2013|425|256|
|2014|352|267|
|later years|2901|1623|
|total minimum lease payments|$ 5312|$ 2975|
|amount representing interest|n/a|-914 ( 914 )|
|present value of minimum lease payments|n/a|$ 2061|
the majority of capital lease payments relate to locomotives . rent expense for operating leases with terms exceeding one month was $ 686 million in 2009 , $ 747 million in 2008 , and $ 810 million in 2007 . when cash rental payments are not made on a straight-line basis , we recognize variable rental expense on a straight-line basis over the lease term . contingent rentals and sub-rentals are not significant . 15 . commitments and contingencies asserted and unasserted claims 2013 various claims and lawsuits are pending against us and certain of our subsidiaries . we cannot fully determine the effect of all asserted and unasserted claims on our consolidated results of operations , financial condition , or liquidity ; however , to the extent possible , where asserted and unasserted claims are considered probable and where such claims can be reasonably estimated , we have recorded a liability . we do not expect that any known lawsuits , claims , environmental costs , commitments , contingent liabilities , or guarantees will have a material adverse effect on our consolidated results of operations , financial condition , or liquidity after taking into account liabilities and insurance recoveries previously recorded for these matters . personal injury 2013 the cost of personal injuries to employees and others related to our activities is charged to expense based on estimates of the ultimate cost and number of incidents each year . we use third-party actuaries to assist us in measuring the expense and liability , including unasserted claims . the federal employers 2019 liability act ( fela ) governs compensation for work-related accidents . under fela , damages are assessed based on a finding of fault through litigation or out-of-court settlements . we offer a comprehensive variety of services and rehabilitation programs for employees who are injured at .
Question: what portion of 2009 operating leases are current liabilities? | 0.10843 | ### Transformed FinQA Question Generation Instructions
#### Step 1: Analyze and Understand the Original FinQA Question
- Objective: Use the given FinQA question to generate a new, logically similar but numerically different question.
- Guidelines:
- Identify the financial concepts and quantitative reasoning in the original question.
- Determine the key variables (e.g., revenue, profit, growth rate, interest) and their relationships.
- Maintain the original question’s structure and complexity.
#### Step 2: Transform and Adapt
- Objective: Create a new FinQA-style question while modifying numerical values and conditions.
- Guidelines:
- Change financial figures, constraints, or business conditions to create a unique question.
- Ensure the transformation maintains financial realism (e.g., realistic market trends, interest rates).
- Retain the original reasoning and computational steps while introducing fresh data points.
#### Step 3: Generate the New FinQA Question
- Objective: Output an original, transformed FinQA question without providing an answer or solution.
- Guidelines:
- Ensure the new question aligns with FinQA’s format and complexity.
- Maintain clarity and well-defined financial relationships.
### Response Rule
- **Generate only the "Transformed FinQA Question" for the given example without including any answer, explanation, or solution.**
### Output Format
#### Transformed FinQA Question: [Write your transformed FinQA question here.]
----
#### Task
#### Original FinQA Question: Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: 14 . leases we lease certain locomotives , freight cars , and other property . the consolidated statement of financial position as of december 31 , 2009 and 2008 included $ 2754 million , net of $ 927 million of accumulated depreciation , and $ 2024 million , net of $ 869 million of accumulated depreciation , respectively , for properties held under capital leases . a charge to income resulting from the depreciation for assets held under capital leases is included within depreciation expense in our consolidated statements of income . future minimum lease payments for operating and capital leases with initial or remaining non-cancelable lease terms in excess of one year as of december 31 , 2009 were as follows : millions of dollars operating leases capital leases .
|millions of dollars|operatingleases|capital leases|
|2010|$ 576|$ 290|
|2011|570|292|
|2012|488|247|
|2013|425|256|
|2014|352|267|
|later years|2901|1623|
|total minimum lease payments|$ 5312|$ 2975|
|amount representing interest|n/a|-914 ( 914 )|
|present value of minimum lease payments|n/a|$ 2061|
the majority of capital lease payments relate to locomotives . rent expense for operating leases with terms exceeding one month was $ 686 million in 2009 , $ 747 million in 2008 , and $ 810 million in 2007 . when cash rental payments are not made on a straight-line basis , we recognize variable rental expense on a straight-line basis over the lease term . contingent rentals and sub-rentals are not significant . 15 . commitments and contingencies asserted and unasserted claims 2013 various claims and lawsuits are pending against us and certain of our subsidiaries . we cannot fully determine the effect of all asserted and unasserted claims on our consolidated results of operations , financial condition , or liquidity ; however , to the extent possible , where asserted and unasserted claims are considered probable and where such claims can be reasonably estimated , we have recorded a liability . we do not expect that any known lawsuits , claims , environmental costs , commitments , contingent liabilities , or guarantees will have a material adverse effect on our consolidated results of operations , financial condition , or liquidity after taking into account liabilities and insurance recoveries previously recorded for these matters . personal injury 2013 the cost of personal injuries to employees and others related to our activities is charged to expense based on estimates of the ultimate cost and number of incidents each year . we use third-party actuaries to assist us in measuring the expense and liability , including unasserted claims . the federal employers 2019 liability act ( fela ) governs compensation for work-related accidents . under fela , damages are assessed based on a finding of fault through litigation or out-of-court settlements . we offer a comprehensive variety of services and rehabilitation programs for employees who are injured at .
Question: what portion of 2009 operating leases are current liabilities? |
Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: 60 the pnc financial services group , inc . 2013 form 10-k liquidity and capital management liquidity risk has two fundamental components . the first is potential loss assuming we were unable to meet our funding requirements at a reasonable cost . the second is the potential inability to operate our businesses because adequate contingent liquidity is not available . we manage liquidity risk at the consolidated company level ( bank , parent company , and nonbank subsidiaries combined ) to help ensure that we can obtain cost-effective funding to meet current and future obligations under both normal 201cbusiness as usual 201d and stressful circumstances , and to help ensure that we maintain an appropriate level of contingent liquidity . management monitors liquidity through a series of early warning indicators that may indicate a potential market , or pnc-specific , liquidity stress event . in addition , management performs a set of liquidity stress tests over multiple time horizons with varying levels of severity and maintains a contingency funding plan to address a potential liquidity stress event . in the most severe liquidity stress simulation , we assume that our liquidity position is under pressure , while the market in general is under systemic pressure . the simulation considers , among other things , the impact of restricted access to both secured and unsecured external sources of funding , accelerated run-off of customer deposits , valuation pressure on assets and heavy demand to fund committed obligations . parent company liquidity guidelines are designed to help ensure that sufficient liquidity is available to meet our parent company obligations over the succeeding 24-month period . liquidity-related risk limits are established within our enterprise liquidity management policy and supporting policies . management committees , including the asset and liability committee , and the board of directors and its risk committee regularly review compliance with key established limits . in addition to these liquidity monitoring measures and tools described above , we also monitor our liquidity by reference to the liquidity coverage ratio ( lcr ) which is further described in the supervision and regulation section in item 1 of this report . pnc and pnc bank calculate the lcr on a daily basis and as of december 31 , 2017 , the lcr for pnc and pnc bank exceeded the fully phased-in requirement of we provide additional information regarding regulatory liquidity requirements and their potential impact on us in the supervision and regulation section of item 1 business and item 1a risk factors of this report . sources of liquidity our largest source of liquidity on a consolidated basis is the customer deposit base generated by our banking businesses . these deposits provide relatively stable and low-cost funding . total deposits increased to $ 265.1 billion at december 31 , 2017 from $ 257.2 billion at december 31 , 2016 , driven by higher consumer and commercial deposits . consumer deposits reflected in part a shift from money market deposits to relationship-based savings products . commercial deposits reflected a shift from demand deposits to money market deposits primarily due to higher interest rates in 2017 . additionally , certain assets determined by us to be liquid and unused borrowing capacity from a number of sources are also available to manage our liquidity position . at december 31 , 2017 , our liquid assets consisted of short- term investments ( federal funds sold , resale agreements , trading securities and interest-earning deposits with banks ) totaling $ 33.0 billion and securities available for sale totaling $ 57.6 billion . the level of liquid assets fluctuates over time based on many factors , including market conditions , loan and deposit growth and balance sheet management activities . of our total liquid assets of $ 90.6 billion , we had $ 3.2 billion of securities available for sale and trading securities pledged as collateral to secure public and trust deposits , repurchase agreements and for other purposes . in addition , $ 4.9 billion of securities held to maturity were also pledged as collateral for these purposes . we also obtain liquidity through various forms of funding , including long-term debt ( senior notes , subordinated debt and fhlb advances ) and short-term borrowings ( securities sold under repurchase agreements , commercial paper and other short-term borrowings ) . see note 10 borrowed funds and the funding sources section of the consolidated balance sheet review in this report for additional information related to our borrowings . total senior and subordinated debt , on a consolidated basis , increased due to the following activity : table 25 : senior and subordinated debt .
|in billions|2017|
|january 1|$ 31.0|
|issuances|7.1|
|calls and maturities|-4.6 ( 4.6 )|
|other|-.2 ( .2 )|
|december 31|$ 33.3|
.
Question: 2017 ending total liquid assets were what percent of total senior and subordinated debt? | 2.72072 | ### Transformed FinQA Question Generation Instructions
#### Step 1: Analyze and Understand the Original FinQA Question
- Objective: Use the given FinQA question to generate a new, logically similar but numerically different question.
- Guidelines:
- Identify the financial concepts and quantitative reasoning in the original question.
- Determine the key variables (e.g., revenue, profit, growth rate, interest) and their relationships.
- Maintain the original question’s structure and complexity.
#### Step 2: Transform and Adapt
- Objective: Create a new FinQA-style question while modifying numerical values and conditions.
- Guidelines:
- Change financial figures, constraints, or business conditions to create a unique question.
- Ensure the transformation maintains financial realism (e.g., realistic market trends, interest rates).
- Retain the original reasoning and computational steps while introducing fresh data points.
#### Step 3: Generate the New FinQA Question
- Objective: Output an original, transformed FinQA question without providing an answer or solution.
- Guidelines:
- Ensure the new question aligns with FinQA’s format and complexity.
- Maintain clarity and well-defined financial relationships.
### Response Rule
- **Generate only the "Transformed FinQA Question" for the given example without including any answer, explanation, or solution.**
### Output Format
#### Transformed FinQA Question: [Write your transformed FinQA question here.]
----
#### Task
#### Original FinQA Question: Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: 60 the pnc financial services group , inc . 2013 form 10-k liquidity and capital management liquidity risk has two fundamental components . the first is potential loss assuming we were unable to meet our funding requirements at a reasonable cost . the second is the potential inability to operate our businesses because adequate contingent liquidity is not available . we manage liquidity risk at the consolidated company level ( bank , parent company , and nonbank subsidiaries combined ) to help ensure that we can obtain cost-effective funding to meet current and future obligations under both normal 201cbusiness as usual 201d and stressful circumstances , and to help ensure that we maintain an appropriate level of contingent liquidity . management monitors liquidity through a series of early warning indicators that may indicate a potential market , or pnc-specific , liquidity stress event . in addition , management performs a set of liquidity stress tests over multiple time horizons with varying levels of severity and maintains a contingency funding plan to address a potential liquidity stress event . in the most severe liquidity stress simulation , we assume that our liquidity position is under pressure , while the market in general is under systemic pressure . the simulation considers , among other things , the impact of restricted access to both secured and unsecured external sources of funding , accelerated run-off of customer deposits , valuation pressure on assets and heavy demand to fund committed obligations . parent company liquidity guidelines are designed to help ensure that sufficient liquidity is available to meet our parent company obligations over the succeeding 24-month period . liquidity-related risk limits are established within our enterprise liquidity management policy and supporting policies . management committees , including the asset and liability committee , and the board of directors and its risk committee regularly review compliance with key established limits . in addition to these liquidity monitoring measures and tools described above , we also monitor our liquidity by reference to the liquidity coverage ratio ( lcr ) which is further described in the supervision and regulation section in item 1 of this report . pnc and pnc bank calculate the lcr on a daily basis and as of december 31 , 2017 , the lcr for pnc and pnc bank exceeded the fully phased-in requirement of we provide additional information regarding regulatory liquidity requirements and their potential impact on us in the supervision and regulation section of item 1 business and item 1a risk factors of this report . sources of liquidity our largest source of liquidity on a consolidated basis is the customer deposit base generated by our banking businesses . these deposits provide relatively stable and low-cost funding . total deposits increased to $ 265.1 billion at december 31 , 2017 from $ 257.2 billion at december 31 , 2016 , driven by higher consumer and commercial deposits . consumer deposits reflected in part a shift from money market deposits to relationship-based savings products . commercial deposits reflected a shift from demand deposits to money market deposits primarily due to higher interest rates in 2017 . additionally , certain assets determined by us to be liquid and unused borrowing capacity from a number of sources are also available to manage our liquidity position . at december 31 , 2017 , our liquid assets consisted of short- term investments ( federal funds sold , resale agreements , trading securities and interest-earning deposits with banks ) totaling $ 33.0 billion and securities available for sale totaling $ 57.6 billion . the level of liquid assets fluctuates over time based on many factors , including market conditions , loan and deposit growth and balance sheet management activities . of our total liquid assets of $ 90.6 billion , we had $ 3.2 billion of securities available for sale and trading securities pledged as collateral to secure public and trust deposits , repurchase agreements and for other purposes . in addition , $ 4.9 billion of securities held to maturity were also pledged as collateral for these purposes . we also obtain liquidity through various forms of funding , including long-term debt ( senior notes , subordinated debt and fhlb advances ) and short-term borrowings ( securities sold under repurchase agreements , commercial paper and other short-term borrowings ) . see note 10 borrowed funds and the funding sources section of the consolidated balance sheet review in this report for additional information related to our borrowings . total senior and subordinated debt , on a consolidated basis , increased due to the following activity : table 25 : senior and subordinated debt .
|in billions|2017|
|january 1|$ 31.0|
|issuances|7.1|
|calls and maturities|-4.6 ( 4.6 )|
|other|-.2 ( .2 )|
|december 31|$ 33.3|
.
Question: 2017 ending total liquid assets were what percent of total senior and subordinated debt? |
Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: the graph below matches cadence design systems , inc . 2019s cumulative 5-year total shareholder return on common stock with the cumulative total returns of the s&p 500 index , the s&p information technology index , and the nasdaq composite index . the graph assumes that the value of the investment in our common stock , and in each index ( including reinvestment of dividends ) was $ 100 on december 28 , 2002 and tracks it through december 29 , 2007 . comparison of 5 year cumulative total return* among cadence design systems , inc. , the s&p 500 index , the nasdaq composite index and the s&p information technology index 12/29/0712/30/0612/31/051/1/051/3/0412/28/02 cadence design systems , inc . nasdaq composite s & p information technology s & p 500 * $ 100 invested on 12/28/02 in stock or on 12/31/02 in index-including reinvestment of dividends . indexes calculated on month-end basis . copyright b7 2007 , standard & poor 2019s , a division of the mcgraw-hill companies , inc . all rights reserved . www.researchdatagroup.com/s&p.htm .
||12/28/02|1/3/04|1/1/05|12/31/05|12/30/06|12/29/07|
|cadence design systems inc .|100.00|149.92|113.38|138.92|147.04|139.82|
|s & p 500|100.00|128.68|142.69|149.70|173.34|182.87|
|nasdaq composite|100.00|149.75|164.64|168.60|187.83|205.22|
|s & p information technology|100.00|147.23|150.99|152.49|165.32|192.28|
the stock price performance included in this graph is not necessarily indicative of future stock price performance .
Question: what was the difference in percentage cadence design systems , inc . 2019s cumulative 5-year total shareholder return on common stock versus the s&p 500 for the period ending 12/29/07? | -0.4305 | ### Transformed FinQA Question Generation Instructions
#### Step 1: Analyze and Understand the Original FinQA Question
- Objective: Use the given FinQA question to generate a new, logically similar but numerically different question.
- Guidelines:
- Identify the financial concepts and quantitative reasoning in the original question.
- Determine the key variables (e.g., revenue, profit, growth rate, interest) and their relationships.
- Maintain the original question’s structure and complexity.
#### Step 2: Transform and Adapt
- Objective: Create a new FinQA-style question while modifying numerical values and conditions.
- Guidelines:
- Change financial figures, constraints, or business conditions to create a unique question.
- Ensure the transformation maintains financial realism (e.g., realistic market trends, interest rates).
- Retain the original reasoning and computational steps while introducing fresh data points.
#### Step 3: Generate the New FinQA Question
- Objective: Output an original, transformed FinQA question without providing an answer or solution.
- Guidelines:
- Ensure the new question aligns with FinQA’s format and complexity.
- Maintain clarity and well-defined financial relationships.
### Response Rule
- **Generate only the "Transformed FinQA Question" for the given example without including any answer, explanation, or solution.**
### Output Format
#### Transformed FinQA Question: [Write your transformed FinQA question here.]
----
#### Task
#### Original FinQA Question: Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: the graph below matches cadence design systems , inc . 2019s cumulative 5-year total shareholder return on common stock with the cumulative total returns of the s&p 500 index , the s&p information technology index , and the nasdaq composite index . the graph assumes that the value of the investment in our common stock , and in each index ( including reinvestment of dividends ) was $ 100 on december 28 , 2002 and tracks it through december 29 , 2007 . comparison of 5 year cumulative total return* among cadence design systems , inc. , the s&p 500 index , the nasdaq composite index and the s&p information technology index 12/29/0712/30/0612/31/051/1/051/3/0412/28/02 cadence design systems , inc . nasdaq composite s & p information technology s & p 500 * $ 100 invested on 12/28/02 in stock or on 12/31/02 in index-including reinvestment of dividends . indexes calculated on month-end basis . copyright b7 2007 , standard & poor 2019s , a division of the mcgraw-hill companies , inc . all rights reserved . www.researchdatagroup.com/s&p.htm .
||12/28/02|1/3/04|1/1/05|12/31/05|12/30/06|12/29/07|
|cadence design systems inc .|100.00|149.92|113.38|138.92|147.04|139.82|
|s & p 500|100.00|128.68|142.69|149.70|173.34|182.87|
|nasdaq composite|100.00|149.75|164.64|168.60|187.83|205.22|
|s & p information technology|100.00|147.23|150.99|152.49|165.32|192.28|
the stock price performance included in this graph is not necessarily indicative of future stock price performance .
Question: what was the difference in percentage cadence design systems , inc . 2019s cumulative 5-year total shareholder return on common stock versus the s&p 500 for the period ending 12/29/07? |
Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: the aes corporation notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) december 31 , 2018 , 2017 , and 2016 the following is a reconciliation of the beginning and ending amounts of unrecognized tax benefits for the periods indicated ( in millions ) : .
||2018|2017|2016|
|balance at january 1|$ 348|$ 352|$ 364|
|additions for current year tax positions|2|2014|2|
|additions for tax positions of prior years|146|2|1|
|reductions for tax positions of prior years|( 26 )|( 5 )|( 1 )|
|settlements|2014|2014|( 13 )|
|lapse of statute of limitations|( 7 )|( 1 )|( 1 )|
|balance at december 31|$ 463|$ 348|$ 352|
the company and certain of its subsidiaries are currently under examination by the relevant taxing authorities for various tax years . the company regularly assesses the potential outcome of these examinations in each of the taxing jurisdictions when determining the adequacy of the amount of unrecognized tax benefit recorded . while it is often difficult to predict the final outcome or the timing of resolution of any particular uncertain tax position , we believe we have appropriately accrued for our uncertain tax benefits . however , audit outcomes and the timing of audit settlements and future events that would impact our previously recorded unrecognized tax benefits and the range of anticipated increases or decreases in unrecognized tax benefits are subject to significant uncertainty . it is possible that the ultimate outcome of current or future examinations may exceed our provision for current unrecognized tax benefits in amounts that could be material , but cannot be estimated as of december 31 , 2018 . our effective tax rate and net income in any given future period could therefore be materially impacted . 22 . discontinued operations due to a portfolio evaluation in the first half of 2016 , management decided to pursue a strategic shift of its distribution companies in brazil , sul and eletropaulo , to reduce the company's exposure to the brazilian distribution market . the disposals of sul and eletropaulo were completed in october 2016 and june 2018 , respectively . eletropaulo 2014 in november 2017 , eletropaulo converted its preferred shares into ordinary shares and transitioned the listing of those shares to the novo mercado , which is a listing segment of the brazilian stock exchange with the highest standards of corporate governance . upon conversion of the preferred shares into ordinary shares , aes no longer controlled eletropaulo , but maintained significant influence over the business . as a result , the company deconsolidated eletropaulo . after deconsolidation , the company's 17% ( 17 % ) ownership interest was reflected as an equity method investment . the company recorded an after-tax loss on deconsolidation of $ 611 million , which primarily consisted of $ 455 million related to cumulative translation losses and $ 243 million related to pension losses reclassified from aocl . in december 2017 , all the remaining criteria were met for eletropaulo to qualify as a discontinued operation . therefore , its results of operations and financial position were reported as such in the consolidated financial statements for all periods presented . in june 2018 , the company completed the sale of its entire 17% ( 17 % ) ownership interest in eletropaulo through a bidding process hosted by the brazilian securities regulator , cvm . gross proceeds of $ 340 million were received at our subsidiary in brazil , subject to the payment of taxes . upon disposal of eletropaulo , the company recorded a pre-tax gain on sale of $ 243 million ( after-tax $ 199 million ) . excluding the gain on sale , eletropaulo's pre-tax loss attributable to aes was immaterial for the year ended december 31 , 2018 . eletropaulo's pre-tax loss attributable to aes , including the loss on deconsolidation , for the years ended december 31 , 2017 and 2016 was $ 633 million and $ 192 million , respectively . prior to its classification as discontinued operations , eletropaulo was reported in the south america sbu reportable segment . sul 2014 the company executed an agreement for the sale of sul , a wholly-owned subsidiary , in june 2016 . the results of operations and financial position of sul are reported as discontinued operations in the consolidated financial statements for all periods presented . upon meeting the held-for-sale criteria , the company recognized an after-tax loss of $ 382 million comprised of a pre-tax impairment charge of $ 783 million , offset by a tax benefit of $ 266 million related to the impairment of the sul long lived assets and a tax benefit of $ 135 million for deferred taxes related to the investment in sul . prior to the impairment charge , the carrying value of the sul asset group of $ 1.6 billion was greater than its approximate fair value less costs to sell . however , the impairment charge was limited to the carrying value of the long lived assets of the sul disposal group. .
Question: what was the percentage change of unrecognized tax benefits at year end between 2017 and 2018? | 0.33046 | ### Transformed FinQA Question Generation Instructions
#### Step 1: Analyze and Understand the Original FinQA Question
- Objective: Use the given FinQA question to generate a new, logically similar but numerically different question.
- Guidelines:
- Identify the financial concepts and quantitative reasoning in the original question.
- Determine the key variables (e.g., revenue, profit, growth rate, interest) and their relationships.
- Maintain the original question’s structure and complexity.
#### Step 2: Transform and Adapt
- Objective: Create a new FinQA-style question while modifying numerical values and conditions.
- Guidelines:
- Change financial figures, constraints, or business conditions to create a unique question.
- Ensure the transformation maintains financial realism (e.g., realistic market trends, interest rates).
- Retain the original reasoning and computational steps while introducing fresh data points.
#### Step 3: Generate the New FinQA Question
- Objective: Output an original, transformed FinQA question without providing an answer or solution.
- Guidelines:
- Ensure the new question aligns with FinQA’s format and complexity.
- Maintain clarity and well-defined financial relationships.
### Response Rule
- **Generate only the "Transformed FinQA Question" for the given example without including any answer, explanation, or solution.**
### Output Format
#### Transformed FinQA Question: [Write your transformed FinQA question here.]
----
#### Task
#### Original FinQA Question: Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: the aes corporation notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) december 31 , 2018 , 2017 , and 2016 the following is a reconciliation of the beginning and ending amounts of unrecognized tax benefits for the periods indicated ( in millions ) : .
||2018|2017|2016|
|balance at january 1|$ 348|$ 352|$ 364|
|additions for current year tax positions|2|2014|2|
|additions for tax positions of prior years|146|2|1|
|reductions for tax positions of prior years|( 26 )|( 5 )|( 1 )|
|settlements|2014|2014|( 13 )|
|lapse of statute of limitations|( 7 )|( 1 )|( 1 )|
|balance at december 31|$ 463|$ 348|$ 352|
the company and certain of its subsidiaries are currently under examination by the relevant taxing authorities for various tax years . the company regularly assesses the potential outcome of these examinations in each of the taxing jurisdictions when determining the adequacy of the amount of unrecognized tax benefit recorded . while it is often difficult to predict the final outcome or the timing of resolution of any particular uncertain tax position , we believe we have appropriately accrued for our uncertain tax benefits . however , audit outcomes and the timing of audit settlements and future events that would impact our previously recorded unrecognized tax benefits and the range of anticipated increases or decreases in unrecognized tax benefits are subject to significant uncertainty . it is possible that the ultimate outcome of current or future examinations may exceed our provision for current unrecognized tax benefits in amounts that could be material , but cannot be estimated as of december 31 , 2018 . our effective tax rate and net income in any given future period could therefore be materially impacted . 22 . discontinued operations due to a portfolio evaluation in the first half of 2016 , management decided to pursue a strategic shift of its distribution companies in brazil , sul and eletropaulo , to reduce the company's exposure to the brazilian distribution market . the disposals of sul and eletropaulo were completed in october 2016 and june 2018 , respectively . eletropaulo 2014 in november 2017 , eletropaulo converted its preferred shares into ordinary shares and transitioned the listing of those shares to the novo mercado , which is a listing segment of the brazilian stock exchange with the highest standards of corporate governance . upon conversion of the preferred shares into ordinary shares , aes no longer controlled eletropaulo , but maintained significant influence over the business . as a result , the company deconsolidated eletropaulo . after deconsolidation , the company's 17% ( 17 % ) ownership interest was reflected as an equity method investment . the company recorded an after-tax loss on deconsolidation of $ 611 million , which primarily consisted of $ 455 million related to cumulative translation losses and $ 243 million related to pension losses reclassified from aocl . in december 2017 , all the remaining criteria were met for eletropaulo to qualify as a discontinued operation . therefore , its results of operations and financial position were reported as such in the consolidated financial statements for all periods presented . in june 2018 , the company completed the sale of its entire 17% ( 17 % ) ownership interest in eletropaulo through a bidding process hosted by the brazilian securities regulator , cvm . gross proceeds of $ 340 million were received at our subsidiary in brazil , subject to the payment of taxes . upon disposal of eletropaulo , the company recorded a pre-tax gain on sale of $ 243 million ( after-tax $ 199 million ) . excluding the gain on sale , eletropaulo's pre-tax loss attributable to aes was immaterial for the year ended december 31 , 2018 . eletropaulo's pre-tax loss attributable to aes , including the loss on deconsolidation , for the years ended december 31 , 2017 and 2016 was $ 633 million and $ 192 million , respectively . prior to its classification as discontinued operations , eletropaulo was reported in the south america sbu reportable segment . sul 2014 the company executed an agreement for the sale of sul , a wholly-owned subsidiary , in june 2016 . the results of operations and financial position of sul are reported as discontinued operations in the consolidated financial statements for all periods presented . upon meeting the held-for-sale criteria , the company recognized an after-tax loss of $ 382 million comprised of a pre-tax impairment charge of $ 783 million , offset by a tax benefit of $ 266 million related to the impairment of the sul long lived assets and a tax benefit of $ 135 million for deferred taxes related to the investment in sul . prior to the impairment charge , the carrying value of the sul asset group of $ 1.6 billion was greater than its approximate fair value less costs to sell . however , the impairment charge was limited to the carrying value of the long lived assets of the sul disposal group. .
Question: what was the percentage change of unrecognized tax benefits at year end between 2017 and 2018? |
Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: fidelity national information services , inc . and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements - ( continued ) contingent consideration liabilities recorded in connection with business acquisitions must also be adjusted for changes in fair value until settled . see note 3 for discussion of the capital markets company bvba ( "capco" ) contingent consideration liability . ( d ) derivative financial instruments the company accounts for derivative financial instruments in accordance with financial accounting standards board accounting standards codification ( 201cfasb asc 201d ) topic 815 , derivatives and hedging . during 2016 , 2015 and 2014 , the company engaged in g hedging activities relating to its variable rate debt through the use of interest rate swaps . the company designates these interest rate swaps as cash flow hedges . the estimated fair values of the cash flow hedges are determined using level 2 type measurements . thh ey are recorded as an asset or liability of the company and are included in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets in prepaid expenses and other current assets , other non-current assets , accounts payable and accrued liabilities or other long-term liabilities , as appropriate , and as a component of accumulated other comprehensive earnings , net of deferred taxes . a portion of the amount included in accumulated other comprehensive earnings is recorded in interest expense as a yield adjustment as interest payments are made on then company 2019s term and revolving loans ( note 10 ) . the company 2019s existing cash flow hedge is highly effective and there was no impact on 2016 earnings due to hedge ineffectiveness . it is our policy to execute such instruments with credit-worthy banks and not to enter into derivative financial instruments for speculative purposes . as of december 31 , 2016 , we believe that our interest rate swap counterparty will be able to fulfill its obligations under our agreement . the company's foreign exchange risk management policy permits the use of derivative instruments , such as forward contracts and options , to reduce volatility in the company's results of operations and/or cash flows resulting from foreign exchange rate fluctuations . during 2016 and 2015 , the company entered into foreign currency forward exchange contracts to hedge foreign currency exposure to intercompany loans . as of december 31 , 2016 and 2015 , the notional amount of these derivatives was approximately $ 143 million and aa $ 81 million , respectively , and the fair value was nominal . these derivatives have not been designated as hedges for accounting purposes . we also use currency forward contracts to manage our exposure to fluctuations in costs caused by variations in indian rupee ( "inr" ) ii exchange rates . as of december 31 , 2016 , the notional amount of these derivatives was approximately $ 7 million and the fair value was l less than $ 1 million , which is included in prepaid expenses and other current assets in the consolidated balance sheets . these inr forward contracts are designated as cash flow hedges . the fair value of these currency forward contracts is determined using currency uu exchange market rates , obtained from reliable , independent , third party banks , at the balance sheet date . the fair value of forward rr contracts is subject to changes in currency exchange rates . the company has no ineffectiveness related to its use of currency forward ff contracts in connection with inr cash flow hedges . in september 2015 , the company entered into treasury lock hedges with a total notional amount of $ 1.0 billion , reducing the risk of changes in the benchmark index component of the 10-year treasury yield . the company def signated these derivatives as cash flow hedges . on october 13 , 2015 , in conjunction with the pricing of the $ 4.5 billion senior notes , the companyr terminated these treasury lock contracts for a cash settlement payment of $ 16 million , which was recorded as a component of other comprehensive earnings and will be reclassified as an adjustment to interest expense over the ten years during which the related interest payments that were hedged will be recognized in income . ( e ) trade receivables a summary of trade receivables , net , as of december 31 , 2016 and 2015 is as follows ( in millions ) : .
||2016|2015|
|trade receivables 2014 billed|$ 1452|$ 1546|
|trade receivables 2014 unbilled|228|201|
|total trade receivables|1680|1747|
|allowance for doubtful accounts|-41 ( 41 )|-16 ( 16 )|
|total trade receivables net|$ 1639|$ 1731|
.
Question: what is the percentage change in total trade receivables? | -0.03835 | ### Transformed FinQA Question Generation Instructions
#### Step 1: Analyze and Understand the Original FinQA Question
- Objective: Use the given FinQA question to generate a new, logically similar but numerically different question.
- Guidelines:
- Identify the financial concepts and quantitative reasoning in the original question.
- Determine the key variables (e.g., revenue, profit, growth rate, interest) and their relationships.
- Maintain the original question’s structure and complexity.
#### Step 2: Transform and Adapt
- Objective: Create a new FinQA-style question while modifying numerical values and conditions.
- Guidelines:
- Change financial figures, constraints, or business conditions to create a unique question.
- Ensure the transformation maintains financial realism (e.g., realistic market trends, interest rates).
- Retain the original reasoning and computational steps while introducing fresh data points.
#### Step 3: Generate the New FinQA Question
- Objective: Output an original, transformed FinQA question without providing an answer or solution.
- Guidelines:
- Ensure the new question aligns with FinQA’s format and complexity.
- Maintain clarity and well-defined financial relationships.
### Response Rule
- **Generate only the "Transformed FinQA Question" for the given example without including any answer, explanation, or solution.**
### Output Format
#### Transformed FinQA Question: [Write your transformed FinQA question here.]
----
#### Task
#### Original FinQA Question: Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: fidelity national information services , inc . and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements - ( continued ) contingent consideration liabilities recorded in connection with business acquisitions must also be adjusted for changes in fair value until settled . see note 3 for discussion of the capital markets company bvba ( "capco" ) contingent consideration liability . ( d ) derivative financial instruments the company accounts for derivative financial instruments in accordance with financial accounting standards board accounting standards codification ( 201cfasb asc 201d ) topic 815 , derivatives and hedging . during 2016 , 2015 and 2014 , the company engaged in g hedging activities relating to its variable rate debt through the use of interest rate swaps . the company designates these interest rate swaps as cash flow hedges . the estimated fair values of the cash flow hedges are determined using level 2 type measurements . thh ey are recorded as an asset or liability of the company and are included in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets in prepaid expenses and other current assets , other non-current assets , accounts payable and accrued liabilities or other long-term liabilities , as appropriate , and as a component of accumulated other comprehensive earnings , net of deferred taxes . a portion of the amount included in accumulated other comprehensive earnings is recorded in interest expense as a yield adjustment as interest payments are made on then company 2019s term and revolving loans ( note 10 ) . the company 2019s existing cash flow hedge is highly effective and there was no impact on 2016 earnings due to hedge ineffectiveness . it is our policy to execute such instruments with credit-worthy banks and not to enter into derivative financial instruments for speculative purposes . as of december 31 , 2016 , we believe that our interest rate swap counterparty will be able to fulfill its obligations under our agreement . the company's foreign exchange risk management policy permits the use of derivative instruments , such as forward contracts and options , to reduce volatility in the company's results of operations and/or cash flows resulting from foreign exchange rate fluctuations . during 2016 and 2015 , the company entered into foreign currency forward exchange contracts to hedge foreign currency exposure to intercompany loans . as of december 31 , 2016 and 2015 , the notional amount of these derivatives was approximately $ 143 million and aa $ 81 million , respectively , and the fair value was nominal . these derivatives have not been designated as hedges for accounting purposes . we also use currency forward contracts to manage our exposure to fluctuations in costs caused by variations in indian rupee ( "inr" ) ii exchange rates . as of december 31 , 2016 , the notional amount of these derivatives was approximately $ 7 million and the fair value was l less than $ 1 million , which is included in prepaid expenses and other current assets in the consolidated balance sheets . these inr forward contracts are designated as cash flow hedges . the fair value of these currency forward contracts is determined using currency uu exchange market rates , obtained from reliable , independent , third party banks , at the balance sheet date . the fair value of forward rr contracts is subject to changes in currency exchange rates . the company has no ineffectiveness related to its use of currency forward ff contracts in connection with inr cash flow hedges . in september 2015 , the company entered into treasury lock hedges with a total notional amount of $ 1.0 billion , reducing the risk of changes in the benchmark index component of the 10-year treasury yield . the company def signated these derivatives as cash flow hedges . on october 13 , 2015 , in conjunction with the pricing of the $ 4.5 billion senior notes , the companyr terminated these treasury lock contracts for a cash settlement payment of $ 16 million , which was recorded as a component of other comprehensive earnings and will be reclassified as an adjustment to interest expense over the ten years during which the related interest payments that were hedged will be recognized in income . ( e ) trade receivables a summary of trade receivables , net , as of december 31 , 2016 and 2015 is as follows ( in millions ) : .
||2016|2015|
|trade receivables 2014 billed|$ 1452|$ 1546|
|trade receivables 2014 unbilled|228|201|
|total trade receivables|1680|1747|
|allowance for doubtful accounts|-41 ( 41 )|-16 ( 16 )|
|total trade receivables net|$ 1639|$ 1731|
.
Question: what is the percentage change in total trade receivables? |
Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: part ii , item 8 20 . pension and other benefit plans adoption of sfas 158 in september 2006 , the financial accounting standards board issued sfas 158 ( employer 2019s accounting for defined benefit pension and other postretirement plans , an amendment of fasb statements no . 87 , 88 , 106 and 132 ( r ) ) . sfas 158 required schlumberger to recognize the funded status ( i.e. , the difference between the fair value of plan assets and the benefit obligation ) of its defined benefit pension and other postretirement plans ( collectively 201cpostretirement benefit plans 201d ) in its december 31 , 2006 consolidated balance sheet , with a corresponding adjustment to accumulated other comprehensive income , net of tax . the adjustment to accumulated other comprehensive income at adoption represents the net unrecognized actuarial losses and unrecognized prior service costs which were previously netted against schlumberger 2019s postretirement benefit plans 2019 funded status in the consolidated balance sheet pursuant to the provisions of sfas 87 ( employers 2019 accounting for pensions ) and sfas 106 ( employer 2019s accounting for postretirement benefits other than pensions ) . these amounts will subsequently be recognized as net periodic postretirement cost consistent with schlumberger 2019s historical accounting policy for amortizing such amounts . the adoption of sfas 158 had no effect on schlumberger 2019s consolidated statement of income for the year ended december 31 , 2006 , or for any prior period , and it will not affect schlumberger 2019s operating results in future periods . additionally , sfas 158 did not have an effect on schlumberger 2019s consolidated balance sheet at december 31 , sfas 158 also required companies to measure the fair value of plan assets and benefit obligations as of the date of the fiscal year-end balance sheet . this provision of sfas 158 is not applicable as schlumberger already uses a measurement date of december 31 for its postretirement benefit plans . the incremental effect of applying sfas 158 on the consolidated balance sheet at december 31 , 2006 for all of schlumberger 2019s postretirement benefit plans is presented in the following table : ( stated in millions ) prior to application of sfas 158 sfas 158 adoption adjustments application of sfas 158 .
||prior to application of sfas 158|sfas 158 adoption adjustments|after application of sfas 158|
|deferred taxes ( current )|$ 191|$ -28 ( 28 )|$ 163|
|deferred taxes ( long-term )|$ 186|$ 227|$ 413|
|other assets|$ 416|$ -243 ( 243 )|$ 173|
|accounts payable and accrued liabilities|$ 3925|$ -77 ( 77 )|$ 3848|
|postretirement benefits|$ 713|$ 323|$ 1036|
|accumulated other comprehensive loss|$ -879 ( 879 )|$ -290 ( 290 )|$ -1169 ( 1169 )|
as a result of the adoption of sfas 158 , schlumberger 2019s total liabilities increased by approximately 2% ( 2 % ) and stockholders 2019 equity decreased by approximately 3% ( 3 % ) . the impact on schlumberger 2019s total assets was insignificant . united states defined benefit pension plans schlumberger and its united states subsidiary sponsor several defined benefit pension plans that cover substantially all employees hired prior to october 1 , 2004 . the benefits are based on years of service and compensation on a career-average pay basis . the funding policy with respect to qualified pension plans is to annually contribute amounts that are based upon a number of factors including the actuarial accrued liability , amounts that are deductible for income tax purposes , legal funding requirements and available cash flow . these contributions are intended to provide for benefits earned to date and those expected to be earned in the future. .
Question: by how much did sfas 158 adoption adjustments increase postretirement benefits? | 0.45302 | ### Transformed FinQA Question Generation Instructions
#### Step 1: Analyze and Understand the Original FinQA Question
- Objective: Use the given FinQA question to generate a new, logically similar but numerically different question.
- Guidelines:
- Identify the financial concepts and quantitative reasoning in the original question.
- Determine the key variables (e.g., revenue, profit, growth rate, interest) and their relationships.
- Maintain the original question’s structure and complexity.
#### Step 2: Transform and Adapt
- Objective: Create a new FinQA-style question while modifying numerical values and conditions.
- Guidelines:
- Change financial figures, constraints, or business conditions to create a unique question.
- Ensure the transformation maintains financial realism (e.g., realistic market trends, interest rates).
- Retain the original reasoning and computational steps while introducing fresh data points.
#### Step 3: Generate the New FinQA Question
- Objective: Output an original, transformed FinQA question without providing an answer or solution.
- Guidelines:
- Ensure the new question aligns with FinQA’s format and complexity.
- Maintain clarity and well-defined financial relationships.
### Response Rule
- **Generate only the "Transformed FinQA Question" for the given example without including any answer, explanation, or solution.**
### Output Format
#### Transformed FinQA Question: [Write your transformed FinQA question here.]
----
#### Task
#### Original FinQA Question: Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: part ii , item 8 20 . pension and other benefit plans adoption of sfas 158 in september 2006 , the financial accounting standards board issued sfas 158 ( employer 2019s accounting for defined benefit pension and other postretirement plans , an amendment of fasb statements no . 87 , 88 , 106 and 132 ( r ) ) . sfas 158 required schlumberger to recognize the funded status ( i.e. , the difference between the fair value of plan assets and the benefit obligation ) of its defined benefit pension and other postretirement plans ( collectively 201cpostretirement benefit plans 201d ) in its december 31 , 2006 consolidated balance sheet , with a corresponding adjustment to accumulated other comprehensive income , net of tax . the adjustment to accumulated other comprehensive income at adoption represents the net unrecognized actuarial losses and unrecognized prior service costs which were previously netted against schlumberger 2019s postretirement benefit plans 2019 funded status in the consolidated balance sheet pursuant to the provisions of sfas 87 ( employers 2019 accounting for pensions ) and sfas 106 ( employer 2019s accounting for postretirement benefits other than pensions ) . these amounts will subsequently be recognized as net periodic postretirement cost consistent with schlumberger 2019s historical accounting policy for amortizing such amounts . the adoption of sfas 158 had no effect on schlumberger 2019s consolidated statement of income for the year ended december 31 , 2006 , or for any prior period , and it will not affect schlumberger 2019s operating results in future periods . additionally , sfas 158 did not have an effect on schlumberger 2019s consolidated balance sheet at december 31 , sfas 158 also required companies to measure the fair value of plan assets and benefit obligations as of the date of the fiscal year-end balance sheet . this provision of sfas 158 is not applicable as schlumberger already uses a measurement date of december 31 for its postretirement benefit plans . the incremental effect of applying sfas 158 on the consolidated balance sheet at december 31 , 2006 for all of schlumberger 2019s postretirement benefit plans is presented in the following table : ( stated in millions ) prior to application of sfas 158 sfas 158 adoption adjustments application of sfas 158 .
||prior to application of sfas 158|sfas 158 adoption adjustments|after application of sfas 158|
|deferred taxes ( current )|$ 191|$ -28 ( 28 )|$ 163|
|deferred taxes ( long-term )|$ 186|$ 227|$ 413|
|other assets|$ 416|$ -243 ( 243 )|$ 173|
|accounts payable and accrued liabilities|$ 3925|$ -77 ( 77 )|$ 3848|
|postretirement benefits|$ 713|$ 323|$ 1036|
|accumulated other comprehensive loss|$ -879 ( 879 )|$ -290 ( 290 )|$ -1169 ( 1169 )|
as a result of the adoption of sfas 158 , schlumberger 2019s total liabilities increased by approximately 2% ( 2 % ) and stockholders 2019 equity decreased by approximately 3% ( 3 % ) . the impact on schlumberger 2019s total assets was insignificant . united states defined benefit pension plans schlumberger and its united states subsidiary sponsor several defined benefit pension plans that cover substantially all employees hired prior to october 1 , 2004 . the benefits are based on years of service and compensation on a career-average pay basis . the funding policy with respect to qualified pension plans is to annually contribute amounts that are based upon a number of factors including the actuarial accrued liability , amounts that are deductible for income tax purposes , legal funding requirements and available cash flow . these contributions are intended to provide for benefits earned to date and those expected to be earned in the future. .
Question: by how much did sfas 158 adoption adjustments increase postretirement benefits? |
Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: item 7a . quantitative and qualitative disclosures about market risk ( amounts in millions ) in the normal course of business , we are exposed to market risks related to interest rates , foreign currency rates and certain balance sheet items . from time to time , we use derivative instruments , pursuant to established guidelines and policies , to manage some portion of these risks . derivative instruments utilized in our hedging activities are viewed as risk management tools and are not used for trading or speculative purposes . interest rates our exposure to market risk for changes in interest rates relates primarily to the fair market value and cash flows of our debt obligations . the majority of our debt ( approximately 91% ( 91 % ) and 86% ( 86 % ) as of december 31 , 2014 and 2013 , respectively ) bears interest at fixed rates . we do have debt with variable interest rates , but a 10% ( 10 % ) increase or decrease in interest rates would not be material to our interest expense or cash flows . the fair market value of our debt is sensitive to changes in interest rates , and the impact of a 10% ( 10 % ) change in interest rates is summarized below . increase/ ( decrease ) in fair market value as of december 31 , 10% ( 10 % ) increase in interest rates 10% ( 10 % ) decrease in interest rates .
|as of december 31,|increase/ ( decrease ) in fair market value 10% ( 10 % ) increasein interest rates|increase/ ( decrease ) in fair market value 10% ( 10 % ) decreasein interest rates|
|2014|$ -35.5 ( 35.5 )|$ 36.6|
|2013|-26.9 ( 26.9 )|27.9|
we have used interest rate swaps for risk management purposes to manage our exposure to changes in interest rates . we do not have any interest rate swaps outstanding as of december 31 , 2014 . we had $ 1667.2 of cash , cash equivalents and marketable securities as of december 31 , 2014 that we generally invest in conservative , short-term bank deposits or securities . the interest income generated from these investments is subject to both domestic and foreign interest rate movements . during 2014 and 2013 , we had interest income of $ 27.4 and $ 24.7 , respectively . based on our 2014 results , a 100-basis-point increase or decrease in interest rates would affect our interest income by approximately $ 16.7 , assuming that all cash , cash equivalents and marketable securities are impacted in the same manner and balances remain constant from year-end 2014 levels . foreign currency rates we are subject to translation and transaction risks related to changes in foreign currency exchange rates . since we report revenues and expenses in u.s . dollars , changes in exchange rates may either positively or negatively affect our consolidated revenues and expenses ( as expressed in u.s . dollars ) from foreign operations . the primary foreign currencies that impacted our results during 2014 included the argentine peso , australian dollar , brazilian real and british pound sterling . based on 2014 exchange rates and operating results , if the u.s . dollar were to strengthen or weaken by 10% ( 10 % ) , we currently estimate operating income would decrease or increase approximately 4% ( 4 % ) , assuming that all currencies are impacted in the same manner and our international revenue and expenses remain constant at 2014 levels . the functional currency of our foreign operations is generally their respective local currency . assets and liabilities are translated at the exchange rates in effect at the balance sheet date , and revenues and expenses are translated at the average exchange rates during the period presented . the resulting translation adjustments are recorded as a component of accumulated other comprehensive loss , net of tax , in the stockholders 2019 equity section of our consolidated balance sheets . our foreign subsidiaries generally collect revenues and pay expenses in their functional currency , mitigating transaction risk . however , certain subsidiaries may enter into transactions in currencies other than their functional currency . assets and liabilities denominated in currencies other than the functional currency are susceptible to movements in foreign currency until final settlement . currency transaction gains or losses primarily arising from transactions in currencies other than the functional currency are included in office and general expenses . we have not entered into a material amount of foreign currency forward exchange contracts or other derivative financial instruments to hedge the effects of potential adverse fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates. .
Question: what is the growth rate of interest income from 2013 to 2014? | 0.10931 | ### Transformed FinQA Question Generation Instructions
#### Step 1: Analyze and Understand the Original FinQA Question
- Objective: Use the given FinQA question to generate a new, logically similar but numerically different question.
- Guidelines:
- Identify the financial concepts and quantitative reasoning in the original question.
- Determine the key variables (e.g., revenue, profit, growth rate, interest) and their relationships.
- Maintain the original question’s structure and complexity.
#### Step 2: Transform and Adapt
- Objective: Create a new FinQA-style question while modifying numerical values and conditions.
- Guidelines:
- Change financial figures, constraints, or business conditions to create a unique question.
- Ensure the transformation maintains financial realism (e.g., realistic market trends, interest rates).
- Retain the original reasoning and computational steps while introducing fresh data points.
#### Step 3: Generate the New FinQA Question
- Objective: Output an original, transformed FinQA question without providing an answer or solution.
- Guidelines:
- Ensure the new question aligns with FinQA’s format and complexity.
- Maintain clarity and well-defined financial relationships.
### Response Rule
- **Generate only the "Transformed FinQA Question" for the given example without including any answer, explanation, or solution.**
### Output Format
#### Transformed FinQA Question: [Write your transformed FinQA question here.]
----
#### Task
#### Original FinQA Question: Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: item 7a . quantitative and qualitative disclosures about market risk ( amounts in millions ) in the normal course of business , we are exposed to market risks related to interest rates , foreign currency rates and certain balance sheet items . from time to time , we use derivative instruments , pursuant to established guidelines and policies , to manage some portion of these risks . derivative instruments utilized in our hedging activities are viewed as risk management tools and are not used for trading or speculative purposes . interest rates our exposure to market risk for changes in interest rates relates primarily to the fair market value and cash flows of our debt obligations . the majority of our debt ( approximately 91% ( 91 % ) and 86% ( 86 % ) as of december 31 , 2014 and 2013 , respectively ) bears interest at fixed rates . we do have debt with variable interest rates , but a 10% ( 10 % ) increase or decrease in interest rates would not be material to our interest expense or cash flows . the fair market value of our debt is sensitive to changes in interest rates , and the impact of a 10% ( 10 % ) change in interest rates is summarized below . increase/ ( decrease ) in fair market value as of december 31 , 10% ( 10 % ) increase in interest rates 10% ( 10 % ) decrease in interest rates .
|as of december 31,|increase/ ( decrease ) in fair market value 10% ( 10 % ) increasein interest rates|increase/ ( decrease ) in fair market value 10% ( 10 % ) decreasein interest rates|
|2014|$ -35.5 ( 35.5 )|$ 36.6|
|2013|-26.9 ( 26.9 )|27.9|
we have used interest rate swaps for risk management purposes to manage our exposure to changes in interest rates . we do not have any interest rate swaps outstanding as of december 31 , 2014 . we had $ 1667.2 of cash , cash equivalents and marketable securities as of december 31 , 2014 that we generally invest in conservative , short-term bank deposits or securities . the interest income generated from these investments is subject to both domestic and foreign interest rate movements . during 2014 and 2013 , we had interest income of $ 27.4 and $ 24.7 , respectively . based on our 2014 results , a 100-basis-point increase or decrease in interest rates would affect our interest income by approximately $ 16.7 , assuming that all cash , cash equivalents and marketable securities are impacted in the same manner and balances remain constant from year-end 2014 levels . foreign currency rates we are subject to translation and transaction risks related to changes in foreign currency exchange rates . since we report revenues and expenses in u.s . dollars , changes in exchange rates may either positively or negatively affect our consolidated revenues and expenses ( as expressed in u.s . dollars ) from foreign operations . the primary foreign currencies that impacted our results during 2014 included the argentine peso , australian dollar , brazilian real and british pound sterling . based on 2014 exchange rates and operating results , if the u.s . dollar were to strengthen or weaken by 10% ( 10 % ) , we currently estimate operating income would decrease or increase approximately 4% ( 4 % ) , assuming that all currencies are impacted in the same manner and our international revenue and expenses remain constant at 2014 levels . the functional currency of our foreign operations is generally their respective local currency . assets and liabilities are translated at the exchange rates in effect at the balance sheet date , and revenues and expenses are translated at the average exchange rates during the period presented . the resulting translation adjustments are recorded as a component of accumulated other comprehensive loss , net of tax , in the stockholders 2019 equity section of our consolidated balance sheets . our foreign subsidiaries generally collect revenues and pay expenses in their functional currency , mitigating transaction risk . however , certain subsidiaries may enter into transactions in currencies other than their functional currency . assets and liabilities denominated in currencies other than the functional currency are susceptible to movements in foreign currency until final settlement . currency transaction gains or losses primarily arising from transactions in currencies other than the functional currency are included in office and general expenses . we have not entered into a material amount of foreign currency forward exchange contracts or other derivative financial instruments to hedge the effects of potential adverse fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates. .
Question: what is the growth rate of interest income from 2013 to 2014? |
Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: o . segment information 2013 ( concluded ) ( 1 ) included in net sales were export sales from the u.s . of $ 246 million , $ 277 million and $ 275 million in 2010 , 2009 and 2008 , respectively . ( 2 ) intra-company sales between segments represented approximately two percent of net sales in 2010 , three percent of net sales in 2009 and one percent of net sales in 2008 . ( 3 ) included in net sales were sales to one customer of $ 1993 million , $ 2053 million and $ 2058 million in 2010 , 2009 and 2008 , respectively . such net sales were included in the following segments : cabinets and related products , plumbing products , decorative architectural products and other specialty products . ( 4 ) net sales from the company 2019s operations in the u.s . were $ 5618 million , $ 5952 million and $ 7150 million in 2010 , 2009 and 2008 , respectively . ( 5 ) net sales , operating ( loss ) profit , property additions and depreciation and amortization expense for 2010 , 2009 and 2008 excluded the results of businesses reported as discontinued operations in 2010 , 2009 and 2008 . ( 6 ) included in segment operating ( loss ) profit for 2010 were impairment charges for goodwill and other intangible assets as follows : plumbing products 2013 $ 1 million ; and installation and other services 2013 $ 720 million . included in segment operating profit ( loss ) for 2009 were impairment charges for goodwill as follows : plumbing products 2013 $ 39 million ; other specialty products 2013 $ 223 million . included in segment operating profit ( loss ) for 2008 were impairment charges for goodwill and other intangible assets as follows : cabinets and related products 2013 $ 59 million ; plumbing products 2013 $ 203 million ; installation and other services 2013 $ 52 million ; and other specialty products 2013 $ 153 million . ( 7 ) general corporate expense , net included those expenses not specifically attributable to the company 2019s segments . ( 8 ) during 2009 , the company recognized a curtailment loss related to the plan to freeze all future benefit accruals beginning january 1 , 2010 under substantially all of the company 2019s domestic qualified and non-qualified defined-benefit pension plans . see note m to the consolidated financial statements . ( 9 ) the charge for litigation settlement in 2009 relates to a business unit in the cabinets and related products segment . the charge for litigation settlement in 2008 relates to a business unit in the installation and other services segment . ( 10 ) see note l to the consolidated financial statements . ( 11 ) long-lived assets of the company 2019s operations in the u.s . and europe were $ 3684 million and $ 617 million , $ 4628 million and $ 690 million , and $ 4887 million and $ 770 million at december 31 , 2010 , 2009 and 2008 , respectively . ( 12 ) segment assets for 2009 and 2008 excluded the assets of businesses reported as discontinued operations . p . other income ( expense ) , net other , net , which is included in other income ( expense ) , net , was as follows , in millions: .
||2010|2009|2008|
|income from cash and cash investments|$ 6|$ 7|$ 22|
|other interest income|1|2|2|
|income from financial investments net ( note e )|9|3|1|
|other items net|-9 ( 9 )|17|-22 ( 22 )|
|total other net|$ 7|$ 29|$ 3|
masco corporation notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) .
Question: what was the increase observed in the export sales among net sales during 2008 and 2009? | 0.00727 | ### Transformed FinQA Question Generation Instructions
#### Step 1: Analyze and Understand the Original FinQA Question
- Objective: Use the given FinQA question to generate a new, logically similar but numerically different question.
- Guidelines:
- Identify the financial concepts and quantitative reasoning in the original question.
- Determine the key variables (e.g., revenue, profit, growth rate, interest) and their relationships.
- Maintain the original question’s structure and complexity.
#### Step 2: Transform and Adapt
- Objective: Create a new FinQA-style question while modifying numerical values and conditions.
- Guidelines:
- Change financial figures, constraints, or business conditions to create a unique question.
- Ensure the transformation maintains financial realism (e.g., realistic market trends, interest rates).
- Retain the original reasoning and computational steps while introducing fresh data points.
#### Step 3: Generate the New FinQA Question
- Objective: Output an original, transformed FinQA question without providing an answer or solution.
- Guidelines:
- Ensure the new question aligns with FinQA’s format and complexity.
- Maintain clarity and well-defined financial relationships.
### Response Rule
- **Generate only the "Transformed FinQA Question" for the given example without including any answer, explanation, or solution.**
### Output Format
#### Transformed FinQA Question: [Write your transformed FinQA question here.]
----
#### Task
#### Original FinQA Question: Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: o . segment information 2013 ( concluded ) ( 1 ) included in net sales were export sales from the u.s . of $ 246 million , $ 277 million and $ 275 million in 2010 , 2009 and 2008 , respectively . ( 2 ) intra-company sales between segments represented approximately two percent of net sales in 2010 , three percent of net sales in 2009 and one percent of net sales in 2008 . ( 3 ) included in net sales were sales to one customer of $ 1993 million , $ 2053 million and $ 2058 million in 2010 , 2009 and 2008 , respectively . such net sales were included in the following segments : cabinets and related products , plumbing products , decorative architectural products and other specialty products . ( 4 ) net sales from the company 2019s operations in the u.s . were $ 5618 million , $ 5952 million and $ 7150 million in 2010 , 2009 and 2008 , respectively . ( 5 ) net sales , operating ( loss ) profit , property additions and depreciation and amortization expense for 2010 , 2009 and 2008 excluded the results of businesses reported as discontinued operations in 2010 , 2009 and 2008 . ( 6 ) included in segment operating ( loss ) profit for 2010 were impairment charges for goodwill and other intangible assets as follows : plumbing products 2013 $ 1 million ; and installation and other services 2013 $ 720 million . included in segment operating profit ( loss ) for 2009 were impairment charges for goodwill as follows : plumbing products 2013 $ 39 million ; other specialty products 2013 $ 223 million . included in segment operating profit ( loss ) for 2008 were impairment charges for goodwill and other intangible assets as follows : cabinets and related products 2013 $ 59 million ; plumbing products 2013 $ 203 million ; installation and other services 2013 $ 52 million ; and other specialty products 2013 $ 153 million . ( 7 ) general corporate expense , net included those expenses not specifically attributable to the company 2019s segments . ( 8 ) during 2009 , the company recognized a curtailment loss related to the plan to freeze all future benefit accruals beginning january 1 , 2010 under substantially all of the company 2019s domestic qualified and non-qualified defined-benefit pension plans . see note m to the consolidated financial statements . ( 9 ) the charge for litigation settlement in 2009 relates to a business unit in the cabinets and related products segment . the charge for litigation settlement in 2008 relates to a business unit in the installation and other services segment . ( 10 ) see note l to the consolidated financial statements . ( 11 ) long-lived assets of the company 2019s operations in the u.s . and europe were $ 3684 million and $ 617 million , $ 4628 million and $ 690 million , and $ 4887 million and $ 770 million at december 31 , 2010 , 2009 and 2008 , respectively . ( 12 ) segment assets for 2009 and 2008 excluded the assets of businesses reported as discontinued operations . p . other income ( expense ) , net other , net , which is included in other income ( expense ) , net , was as follows , in millions: .
||2010|2009|2008|
|income from cash and cash investments|$ 6|$ 7|$ 22|
|other interest income|1|2|2|
|income from financial investments net ( note e )|9|3|1|
|other items net|-9 ( 9 )|17|-22 ( 22 )|
|total other net|$ 7|$ 29|$ 3|
masco corporation notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) .
Question: what was the increase observed in the export sales among net sales during 2008 and 2009? |
Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: on may 20 , 2015 , aon plc issued $ 600 million of 4.750% ( 4.750 % ) senior notes due may 2045 . the 4.750% ( 4.750 % ) notes due may 2045 are fully and unconditionally guaranteed by aon corporation . we used the proceeds of the issuance for general corporate purposes . on september 30 , 2015 , $ 600 million of 3.50% ( 3.50 % ) senior notes issued by aon corporation matured and were repaid . on november 13 , 2015 , aon plc issued $ 400 million of 2.80% ( 2.80 % ) senior notes due march 2021 . the 2.80% ( 2.80 % ) notes due march 2021 are fully and unconditionally guaranteed by aon corporation . we used the proceeds of the issuance for general corporate purposes . credit facilities as of december 31 , 2015 , we had two committed credit facilities outstanding : our $ 400 million u.s . credit facility expiring in march 2017 ( the "2017 facility" ) and $ 900 million multi-currency u.s . credit facility expiring in february 2020 ( the "2020 facility" ) . the 2020 facility was entered into on february 2 , 2015 and replaced the previous 20ac650 million european credit facility . each of these facilities is intended to support our commercial paper obligations and our general working capital needs . in addition , each of these facilities includes customary representations , warranties and covenants , including financial covenants that require us to maintain specified ratios of adjusted consolidated ebitda to consolidated interest expense and consolidated debt to adjusted consolidated ebitda , tested quarterly . at december 31 , 2015 , we did not have borrowings under either the 2017 facility or the 2020 facility , and we were in compliance with the financial covenants and all other covenants contained therein during the twelve months ended december 31 , 2015 . effective february 2 , 2016 , the 2020 facility terms were extended for 1 year and will expire in february 2021 our total debt-to-ebitda ratio at december 31 , 2015 and 2014 , is calculated as follows: .
|years ended december 31,|2015|2014|
|net income|1422|1431|
|interest expense|273|255|
|income taxes|267|334|
|depreciation of fixed assets|229|242|
|amortization of intangible assets|314|352|
|total ebitda|2505|2614|
|total debt|5737|5582|
|total debt-to-ebitda ratio|2.3|2.1|
we use ebitda , as defined by our financial covenants , as a non-gaap measure . this supplemental information related to ebitda represents a measure not in accordance with u.s . gaap and should be viewed in addition to , not instead of , our consolidated financial statements and notes thereto . shelf registration statement on september 3 , 2015 , we filed a shelf registration statement with the sec , registering the offer and sale from time to time of an indeterminate amount of , among other securities , debt securities , preference shares , class a ordinary shares and convertible securities . our ability to access the market as a source of liquidity is dependent on investor demand , market conditions and other factors. .
Question: what is the time-interest-earned ratio for 2015? | 9.17582 | ### Transformed FinQA Question Generation Instructions
#### Step 1: Analyze and Understand the Original FinQA Question
- Objective: Use the given FinQA question to generate a new, logically similar but numerically different question.
- Guidelines:
- Identify the financial concepts and quantitative reasoning in the original question.
- Determine the key variables (e.g., revenue, profit, growth rate, interest) and their relationships.
- Maintain the original question’s structure and complexity.
#### Step 2: Transform and Adapt
- Objective: Create a new FinQA-style question while modifying numerical values and conditions.
- Guidelines:
- Change financial figures, constraints, or business conditions to create a unique question.
- Ensure the transformation maintains financial realism (e.g., realistic market trends, interest rates).
- Retain the original reasoning and computational steps while introducing fresh data points.
#### Step 3: Generate the New FinQA Question
- Objective: Output an original, transformed FinQA question without providing an answer or solution.
- Guidelines:
- Ensure the new question aligns with FinQA’s format and complexity.
- Maintain clarity and well-defined financial relationships.
### Response Rule
- **Generate only the "Transformed FinQA Question" for the given example without including any answer, explanation, or solution.**
### Output Format
#### Transformed FinQA Question: [Write your transformed FinQA question here.]
----
#### Task
#### Original FinQA Question: Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: on may 20 , 2015 , aon plc issued $ 600 million of 4.750% ( 4.750 % ) senior notes due may 2045 . the 4.750% ( 4.750 % ) notes due may 2045 are fully and unconditionally guaranteed by aon corporation . we used the proceeds of the issuance for general corporate purposes . on september 30 , 2015 , $ 600 million of 3.50% ( 3.50 % ) senior notes issued by aon corporation matured and were repaid . on november 13 , 2015 , aon plc issued $ 400 million of 2.80% ( 2.80 % ) senior notes due march 2021 . the 2.80% ( 2.80 % ) notes due march 2021 are fully and unconditionally guaranteed by aon corporation . we used the proceeds of the issuance for general corporate purposes . credit facilities as of december 31 , 2015 , we had two committed credit facilities outstanding : our $ 400 million u.s . credit facility expiring in march 2017 ( the "2017 facility" ) and $ 900 million multi-currency u.s . credit facility expiring in february 2020 ( the "2020 facility" ) . the 2020 facility was entered into on february 2 , 2015 and replaced the previous 20ac650 million european credit facility . each of these facilities is intended to support our commercial paper obligations and our general working capital needs . in addition , each of these facilities includes customary representations , warranties and covenants , including financial covenants that require us to maintain specified ratios of adjusted consolidated ebitda to consolidated interest expense and consolidated debt to adjusted consolidated ebitda , tested quarterly . at december 31 , 2015 , we did not have borrowings under either the 2017 facility or the 2020 facility , and we were in compliance with the financial covenants and all other covenants contained therein during the twelve months ended december 31 , 2015 . effective february 2 , 2016 , the 2020 facility terms were extended for 1 year and will expire in february 2021 our total debt-to-ebitda ratio at december 31 , 2015 and 2014 , is calculated as follows: .
|years ended december 31,|2015|2014|
|net income|1422|1431|
|interest expense|273|255|
|income taxes|267|334|
|depreciation of fixed assets|229|242|
|amortization of intangible assets|314|352|
|total ebitda|2505|2614|
|total debt|5737|5582|
|total debt-to-ebitda ratio|2.3|2.1|
we use ebitda , as defined by our financial covenants , as a non-gaap measure . this supplemental information related to ebitda represents a measure not in accordance with u.s . gaap and should be viewed in addition to , not instead of , our consolidated financial statements and notes thereto . shelf registration statement on september 3 , 2015 , we filed a shelf registration statement with the sec , registering the offer and sale from time to time of an indeterminate amount of , among other securities , debt securities , preference shares , class a ordinary shares and convertible securities . our ability to access the market as a source of liquidity is dependent on investor demand , market conditions and other factors. .
Question: what is the time-interest-earned ratio for 2015? |
Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: abiomed , inc . and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) note 8 . stock award plans and stock-based compensation ( continued ) restricted stock and restricted stock units the following table summarizes restricted stock and restricted stock unit activity for the fiscal year ended march 31 , 2012 : number of shares ( in thousands ) weighted average grant date fair value ( per share ) .
||number of shares ( in thousands )|weighted average grant date fair value ( per share )|
|restricted stock and restricted stock units at beginning of year|407|$ 9.84|
|granted|607|18.13|
|vested|-134 ( 134 )|10.88|
|forfeited|-9 ( 9 )|13.72|
|restricted stock and restricted stock units at end of year|871|$ 15.76|
the remaining unrecognized compensation expense for outstanding restricted stock and restricted stock units , including performance-based awards , as of march 31 , 2012 was $ 7.1 million and the weighted-average period over which this cost will be recognized is 2.2 years . the weighted average grant-date fair value for restricted stock and restricted stock units granted during the years ended march 31 , 2012 , 2011 , and 2010 was $ 18.13 , $ 10.00 and $ 7.67 per share , respectively . the total fair value of restricted stock and restricted stock units vested in fiscal years 2012 , 2011 , and 2010 was $ 1.5 million , $ 1.0 million and $ 0.4 million , respectively . performance-based awards included in the restricted stock and restricted stock units activity discussed above are certain awards granted in fiscal years 2012 , 2011 and 2010 that vest subject to certain performance-based criteria . in june 2010 , 311000 shares of restricted stock and a performance-based award for the potential issuance of 45000 shares of common stock were issued to certain executive officers and members of senior management of the company , all of which would vest upon achievement of prescribed service milestones by the award recipients and performance milestones by the company . during the year ended march 31 , 2011 , the company determined that it met the prescribed performance targets and a portion of these shares and stock options vested . the remaining shares will vest upon satisfaction of prescribed service conditions by the award recipients . during the three months ended june 30 , 2011 , the company determined that it should have been using the graded vesting method instead of the straight-line method to expense stock-based compensation for the performance-based awards issued in june 2010 . this resulted in additional stock based compensation expense of approximately $ 0.6 million being recorded during the three months ended june 30 , 2011 that should have been recorded during the year ended march 31 , 2011 . the company believes that the amount is not material to its march 31 , 2011 consolidated financial statements and therefore recorded the adjustment in the quarter ended june 30 , 2011 . during the three months ended june 30 , 2011 , performance-based awards of restricted stock units for the potential issuance of 284000 shares of common stock were issued to certain executive officers and members of the senior management , all of which would vest upon achievement of prescribed service milestones by the award recipients and revenue performance milestones by the company . as of march 31 , 2012 , the company determined that it met the prescribed targets for 184000 shares underlying these awards and it believes it is probable that the prescribed performance targets will be met for the remaining 100000 shares , and the compensation expense is being recognized accordingly . during the year ended march 31 , 2012 , the company has recorded $ 3.3 million in stock-based compensation expense for equity awards in which the prescribed performance milestones have been achieved or are probable of being achieved . the remaining unrecognized compensation expense related to these equity awards at march 31 , 2012 is $ 3.6 million based on the company 2019s current assessment of probability of achieving the performance milestones . the weighted-average period over which this cost will be recognized is 2.1 years. .
Question: during the 2012 year , did the equity awards in which the prescribed performance milestones were achieved exceed the equity award compensation expense for equity granted during the year? | yes | ### Transformed FinQA Question Generation Instructions
#### Step 1: Analyze and Understand the Original FinQA Question
- Objective: Use the given FinQA question to generate a new, logically similar but numerically different question.
- Guidelines:
- Identify the financial concepts and quantitative reasoning in the original question.
- Determine the key variables (e.g., revenue, profit, growth rate, interest) and their relationships.
- Maintain the original question’s structure and complexity.
#### Step 2: Transform and Adapt
- Objective: Create a new FinQA-style question while modifying numerical values and conditions.
- Guidelines:
- Change financial figures, constraints, or business conditions to create a unique question.
- Ensure the transformation maintains financial realism (e.g., realistic market trends, interest rates).
- Retain the original reasoning and computational steps while introducing fresh data points.
#### Step 3: Generate the New FinQA Question
- Objective: Output an original, transformed FinQA question without providing an answer or solution.
- Guidelines:
- Ensure the new question aligns with FinQA’s format and complexity.
- Maintain clarity and well-defined financial relationships.
### Response Rule
- **Generate only the "Transformed FinQA Question" for the given example without including any answer, explanation, or solution.**
### Output Format
#### Transformed FinQA Question: [Write your transformed FinQA question here.]
----
#### Task
#### Original FinQA Question: Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: abiomed , inc . and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) note 8 . stock award plans and stock-based compensation ( continued ) restricted stock and restricted stock units the following table summarizes restricted stock and restricted stock unit activity for the fiscal year ended march 31 , 2012 : number of shares ( in thousands ) weighted average grant date fair value ( per share ) .
||number of shares ( in thousands )|weighted average grant date fair value ( per share )|
|restricted stock and restricted stock units at beginning of year|407|$ 9.84|
|granted|607|18.13|
|vested|-134 ( 134 )|10.88|
|forfeited|-9 ( 9 )|13.72|
|restricted stock and restricted stock units at end of year|871|$ 15.76|
the remaining unrecognized compensation expense for outstanding restricted stock and restricted stock units , including performance-based awards , as of march 31 , 2012 was $ 7.1 million and the weighted-average period over which this cost will be recognized is 2.2 years . the weighted average grant-date fair value for restricted stock and restricted stock units granted during the years ended march 31 , 2012 , 2011 , and 2010 was $ 18.13 , $ 10.00 and $ 7.67 per share , respectively . the total fair value of restricted stock and restricted stock units vested in fiscal years 2012 , 2011 , and 2010 was $ 1.5 million , $ 1.0 million and $ 0.4 million , respectively . performance-based awards included in the restricted stock and restricted stock units activity discussed above are certain awards granted in fiscal years 2012 , 2011 and 2010 that vest subject to certain performance-based criteria . in june 2010 , 311000 shares of restricted stock and a performance-based award for the potential issuance of 45000 shares of common stock were issued to certain executive officers and members of senior management of the company , all of which would vest upon achievement of prescribed service milestones by the award recipients and performance milestones by the company . during the year ended march 31 , 2011 , the company determined that it met the prescribed performance targets and a portion of these shares and stock options vested . the remaining shares will vest upon satisfaction of prescribed service conditions by the award recipients . during the three months ended june 30 , 2011 , the company determined that it should have been using the graded vesting method instead of the straight-line method to expense stock-based compensation for the performance-based awards issued in june 2010 . this resulted in additional stock based compensation expense of approximately $ 0.6 million being recorded during the three months ended june 30 , 2011 that should have been recorded during the year ended march 31 , 2011 . the company believes that the amount is not material to its march 31 , 2011 consolidated financial statements and therefore recorded the adjustment in the quarter ended june 30 , 2011 . during the three months ended june 30 , 2011 , performance-based awards of restricted stock units for the potential issuance of 284000 shares of common stock were issued to certain executive officers and members of the senior management , all of which would vest upon achievement of prescribed service milestones by the award recipients and revenue performance milestones by the company . as of march 31 , 2012 , the company determined that it met the prescribed targets for 184000 shares underlying these awards and it believes it is probable that the prescribed performance targets will be met for the remaining 100000 shares , and the compensation expense is being recognized accordingly . during the year ended march 31 , 2012 , the company has recorded $ 3.3 million in stock-based compensation expense for equity awards in which the prescribed performance milestones have been achieved or are probable of being achieved . the remaining unrecognized compensation expense related to these equity awards at march 31 , 2012 is $ 3.6 million based on the company 2019s current assessment of probability of achieving the performance milestones . the weighted-average period over which this cost will be recognized is 2.1 years. .
Question: during the 2012 year , did the equity awards in which the prescribed performance milestones were achieved exceed the equity award compensation expense for equity granted during the year? |
Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: notes to consolidated financial statements the table below presents information regarding group inc . 2019s regulatory capital ratios and tier 1 leverage ratio under basel i , as implemented by the federal reserve board . the information as of december 2013 reflects the revised market risk regulatory capital requirements . these changes resulted in increased regulatory capital requirements for market risk . the information as of december 2012 is prior to the implementation of these revised market risk regulatory capital requirements. .
|$ in millions|as of december 2013|as of december 2012|
|tier 1 capital|$ 72471|$ 66977|
|tier 2 capital|$ 13632|$ 13429|
|total capital|$ 86103|$ 80406|
|risk-weighted assets|$ 433226|$ 399928|
|tier 1 capital ratio|16.7% ( 16.7 % )|16.7% ( 16.7 % )|
|total capital ratio|19.9% ( 19.9 % )|20.1% ( 20.1 % )|
|tier 1 leverage ratio|8.1% ( 8.1 % )|7.3% ( 7.3 % )|
revised capital framework the u.s . federal bank regulatory agencies ( agencies ) have approved revised risk-based capital and leverage ratio regulations establishing a new comprehensive capital framework for u.s . banking organizations ( revised capital framework ) . these regulations are largely based on the basel committee 2019s december 2010 final capital framework for strengthening international capital standards ( basel iii ) and also implement certain provisions of the dodd-frank act . under the revised capital framework , group inc . is an 201cadvanced approach 201d banking organization . below are the aspects of the rules that are most relevant to the firm , as an advanced approach banking organization . definition of capital and capital ratios . the revised capital framework introduced changes to the definition of regulatory capital , which , subject to transitional provisions , became effective across the firm 2019s regulatory capital and leverage ratios on january 1 , 2014 . these changes include the introduction of a new capital measure called common equity tier 1 ( cet1 ) , and the related regulatory capital ratio of cet1 to rwas ( cet1 ratio ) . in addition , the definition of tier 1 capital has been narrowed to include only cet1 and instruments such as perpetual non- cumulative preferred stock , which meet certain criteria . certain aspects of the revised requirements phase in over time . these include increases in the minimum capital ratio requirements and the introduction of new capital buffers and certain deductions from regulatory capital ( such as investments in nonconsolidated financial institutions ) . in addition , junior subordinated debt issued to trusts is being phased out of regulatory capital . the minimum cet1 ratio is 4.0% ( 4.0 % ) as of january 1 , 2014 and will increase to 4.5% ( 4.5 % ) on january 1 , 2015 . the minimum tier 1 capital ratio increased from 4.0% ( 4.0 % ) to 5.5% ( 5.5 % ) on january 1 , 2014 and will increase to 6.0% ( 6.0 % ) beginning january 1 , 2015 . the minimum total capital ratio remains unchanged at 8.0% ( 8.0 % ) . these minimum ratios will be supplemented by a new capital conservation buffer that phases in , beginning january 1 , 2016 , in increments of 0.625% ( 0.625 % ) per year until it reaches 2.5% ( 2.5 % ) on january 1 , 2019 . the revised capital framework also introduces a new counter-cyclical capital buffer , to be imposed in the event that national supervisors deem it necessary in order to counteract excessive credit growth . risk-weighted assets . in february 2014 , the federal reserve board informed us that we have completed a satisfactory 201cparallel run , 201d as required of advanced approach banking organizations under the revised capital framework , and therefore changes to rwas will take effect beginning with the second quarter of 2014 . accordingly , the calculation of rwas in future quarters will be based on the following methodologies : 2030 during the first quarter of 2014 2014 the basel i risk-based capital framework adjusted for certain items related to existing capital deductions and the phase-in of new capital deductions ( basel i adjusted ) ; 2030 during the remaining quarters of 2014 2014 the higher of rwas computed under the basel iii advanced approach or the basel i adjusted calculation ; and 2030 beginning in the first quarter of 2015 2014 the higher of rwas computed under the basel iii advanced or standardized approach . goldman sachs 2013 annual report 191 .
Question: what was the percentage change in tier 1 capital between 2012 and 2013? | 0.08203 | ### Transformed FinQA Question Generation Instructions
#### Step 1: Analyze and Understand the Original FinQA Question
- Objective: Use the given FinQA question to generate a new, logically similar but numerically different question.
- Guidelines:
- Identify the financial concepts and quantitative reasoning in the original question.
- Determine the key variables (e.g., revenue, profit, growth rate, interest) and their relationships.
- Maintain the original question’s structure and complexity.
#### Step 2: Transform and Adapt
- Objective: Create a new FinQA-style question while modifying numerical values and conditions.
- Guidelines:
- Change financial figures, constraints, or business conditions to create a unique question.
- Ensure the transformation maintains financial realism (e.g., realistic market trends, interest rates).
- Retain the original reasoning and computational steps while introducing fresh data points.
#### Step 3: Generate the New FinQA Question
- Objective: Output an original, transformed FinQA question without providing an answer or solution.
- Guidelines:
- Ensure the new question aligns with FinQA’s format and complexity.
- Maintain clarity and well-defined financial relationships.
### Response Rule
- **Generate only the "Transformed FinQA Question" for the given example without including any answer, explanation, or solution.**
### Output Format
#### Transformed FinQA Question: [Write your transformed FinQA question here.]
----
#### Task
#### Original FinQA Question: Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: notes to consolidated financial statements the table below presents information regarding group inc . 2019s regulatory capital ratios and tier 1 leverage ratio under basel i , as implemented by the federal reserve board . the information as of december 2013 reflects the revised market risk regulatory capital requirements . these changes resulted in increased regulatory capital requirements for market risk . the information as of december 2012 is prior to the implementation of these revised market risk regulatory capital requirements. .
|$ in millions|as of december 2013|as of december 2012|
|tier 1 capital|$ 72471|$ 66977|
|tier 2 capital|$ 13632|$ 13429|
|total capital|$ 86103|$ 80406|
|risk-weighted assets|$ 433226|$ 399928|
|tier 1 capital ratio|16.7% ( 16.7 % )|16.7% ( 16.7 % )|
|total capital ratio|19.9% ( 19.9 % )|20.1% ( 20.1 % )|
|tier 1 leverage ratio|8.1% ( 8.1 % )|7.3% ( 7.3 % )|
revised capital framework the u.s . federal bank regulatory agencies ( agencies ) have approved revised risk-based capital and leverage ratio regulations establishing a new comprehensive capital framework for u.s . banking organizations ( revised capital framework ) . these regulations are largely based on the basel committee 2019s december 2010 final capital framework for strengthening international capital standards ( basel iii ) and also implement certain provisions of the dodd-frank act . under the revised capital framework , group inc . is an 201cadvanced approach 201d banking organization . below are the aspects of the rules that are most relevant to the firm , as an advanced approach banking organization . definition of capital and capital ratios . the revised capital framework introduced changes to the definition of regulatory capital , which , subject to transitional provisions , became effective across the firm 2019s regulatory capital and leverage ratios on january 1 , 2014 . these changes include the introduction of a new capital measure called common equity tier 1 ( cet1 ) , and the related regulatory capital ratio of cet1 to rwas ( cet1 ratio ) . in addition , the definition of tier 1 capital has been narrowed to include only cet1 and instruments such as perpetual non- cumulative preferred stock , which meet certain criteria . certain aspects of the revised requirements phase in over time . these include increases in the minimum capital ratio requirements and the introduction of new capital buffers and certain deductions from regulatory capital ( such as investments in nonconsolidated financial institutions ) . in addition , junior subordinated debt issued to trusts is being phased out of regulatory capital . the minimum cet1 ratio is 4.0% ( 4.0 % ) as of january 1 , 2014 and will increase to 4.5% ( 4.5 % ) on january 1 , 2015 . the minimum tier 1 capital ratio increased from 4.0% ( 4.0 % ) to 5.5% ( 5.5 % ) on january 1 , 2014 and will increase to 6.0% ( 6.0 % ) beginning january 1 , 2015 . the minimum total capital ratio remains unchanged at 8.0% ( 8.0 % ) . these minimum ratios will be supplemented by a new capital conservation buffer that phases in , beginning january 1 , 2016 , in increments of 0.625% ( 0.625 % ) per year until it reaches 2.5% ( 2.5 % ) on january 1 , 2019 . the revised capital framework also introduces a new counter-cyclical capital buffer , to be imposed in the event that national supervisors deem it necessary in order to counteract excessive credit growth . risk-weighted assets . in february 2014 , the federal reserve board informed us that we have completed a satisfactory 201cparallel run , 201d as required of advanced approach banking organizations under the revised capital framework , and therefore changes to rwas will take effect beginning with the second quarter of 2014 . accordingly , the calculation of rwas in future quarters will be based on the following methodologies : 2030 during the first quarter of 2014 2014 the basel i risk-based capital framework adjusted for certain items related to existing capital deductions and the phase-in of new capital deductions ( basel i adjusted ) ; 2030 during the remaining quarters of 2014 2014 the higher of rwas computed under the basel iii advanced approach or the basel i adjusted calculation ; and 2030 beginning in the first quarter of 2015 2014 the higher of rwas computed under the basel iii advanced or standardized approach . goldman sachs 2013 annual report 191 .
Question: what was the percentage change in tier 1 capital between 2012 and 2013? |
Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: 2010 . on november 1 , 2010 , we redeemed all $ 400 million of our outstanding 6.65% ( 6.65 % ) notes due january 15 , 2011 . the redemption resulted in a $ 5 million early extinguishment charge . receivables securitization facility 2013 at december 31 , 2010 , we have recorded $ 100 million as secured debt under our receivables securitization facility . ( see further discussion of our receivables securitization facility in note 10. ) 15 . variable interest entities we have entered into various lease transactions in which the structure of the leases contain variable interest entities ( vies ) . these vies were created solely for the purpose of doing lease transactions ( principally involving railroad equipment and facilities ) and have no other activities , assets or liabilities outside of the lease transactions . within these lease arrangements , we have the right to purchase some or all of the assets at fixed prices . depending on market conditions , fixed-price purchase options available in the leases could potentially provide benefits to us ; however , these benefits are not expected to be significant . we maintain and operate the assets based on contractual obligations within the lease arrangements , which set specific guidelines consistent within the railroad industry . as such , we have no control over activities that could materially impact the fair value of the leased assets . we do not hold the power to direct the activities of the vies and , therefore , do not control the ongoing activities that have a significant impact on the economic performance of the vies . additionally , we do not have the obligation to absorb losses of the vies or the right to receive benefits of the vies that could potentially be significant to the we are not considered to be the primary beneficiary and do not consolidate these vies because our actions and decisions do not have the most significant effect on the vie 2019s performance and our fixed-price purchase price options are not considered to be potentially significant to the vie 2019s . the future minimum lease payments associated with the vie leases totaled $ 4.2 billion as of december 31 , 2010 . 16 . leases we lease certain locomotives , freight cars , and other property . the consolidated statement of financial position as of december 31 , 2010 and 2009 included $ 2520 million , net of $ 901 million of accumulated depreciation , and $ 2754 million , net of $ 927 million of accumulated depreciation , respectively , for properties held under capital leases . a charge to income resulting from the depreciation for assets held under capital leases is included within depreciation expense in our consolidated statements of income . future minimum lease payments for operating and capital leases with initial or remaining non-cancelable lease terms in excess of one year as of december 31 , 2010 , were as follows : millions operating leases capital leases .
|millions|operatingleases|capitalleases|
|2011|$ 613|$ 311|
|2012|526|251|
|2013|461|253|
|2014|382|261|
|2015|340|262|
|later years|2599|1355|
|total minimum lease payments|$ 4921|$ 2693|
|amount representing interest|n/a|-784 ( 784 )|
|present value of minimum lease payments|n/a|$ 1909|
the majority of capital lease payments relate to locomotives . rent expense for operating leases with terms exceeding one month was $ 624 million in 2010 , $ 686 million in 2009 , and $ 747 million in 2008 . when cash rental payments are not made on a straight-line basis , we recognize variable rental expense on a straight-line basis over the lease term . contingent rentals and sub-rentals are not significant. .
Question: in 2010 what was the percent of the early extinguishment charge to the amount of the outstanding 6.65% ( 6.65 % ) notes due january 15 , 2011 | 0.0125 | ### Transformed FinQA Question Generation Instructions
#### Step 1: Analyze and Understand the Original FinQA Question
- Objective: Use the given FinQA question to generate a new, logically similar but numerically different question.
- Guidelines:
- Identify the financial concepts and quantitative reasoning in the original question.
- Determine the key variables (e.g., revenue, profit, growth rate, interest) and their relationships.
- Maintain the original question’s structure and complexity.
#### Step 2: Transform and Adapt
- Objective: Create a new FinQA-style question while modifying numerical values and conditions.
- Guidelines:
- Change financial figures, constraints, or business conditions to create a unique question.
- Ensure the transformation maintains financial realism (e.g., realistic market trends, interest rates).
- Retain the original reasoning and computational steps while introducing fresh data points.
#### Step 3: Generate the New FinQA Question
- Objective: Output an original, transformed FinQA question without providing an answer or solution.
- Guidelines:
- Ensure the new question aligns with FinQA’s format and complexity.
- Maintain clarity and well-defined financial relationships.
### Response Rule
- **Generate only the "Transformed FinQA Question" for the given example without including any answer, explanation, or solution.**
### Output Format
#### Transformed FinQA Question: [Write your transformed FinQA question here.]
----
#### Task
#### Original FinQA Question: Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: 2010 . on november 1 , 2010 , we redeemed all $ 400 million of our outstanding 6.65% ( 6.65 % ) notes due january 15 , 2011 . the redemption resulted in a $ 5 million early extinguishment charge . receivables securitization facility 2013 at december 31 , 2010 , we have recorded $ 100 million as secured debt under our receivables securitization facility . ( see further discussion of our receivables securitization facility in note 10. ) 15 . variable interest entities we have entered into various lease transactions in which the structure of the leases contain variable interest entities ( vies ) . these vies were created solely for the purpose of doing lease transactions ( principally involving railroad equipment and facilities ) and have no other activities , assets or liabilities outside of the lease transactions . within these lease arrangements , we have the right to purchase some or all of the assets at fixed prices . depending on market conditions , fixed-price purchase options available in the leases could potentially provide benefits to us ; however , these benefits are not expected to be significant . we maintain and operate the assets based on contractual obligations within the lease arrangements , which set specific guidelines consistent within the railroad industry . as such , we have no control over activities that could materially impact the fair value of the leased assets . we do not hold the power to direct the activities of the vies and , therefore , do not control the ongoing activities that have a significant impact on the economic performance of the vies . additionally , we do not have the obligation to absorb losses of the vies or the right to receive benefits of the vies that could potentially be significant to the we are not considered to be the primary beneficiary and do not consolidate these vies because our actions and decisions do not have the most significant effect on the vie 2019s performance and our fixed-price purchase price options are not considered to be potentially significant to the vie 2019s . the future minimum lease payments associated with the vie leases totaled $ 4.2 billion as of december 31 , 2010 . 16 . leases we lease certain locomotives , freight cars , and other property . the consolidated statement of financial position as of december 31 , 2010 and 2009 included $ 2520 million , net of $ 901 million of accumulated depreciation , and $ 2754 million , net of $ 927 million of accumulated depreciation , respectively , for properties held under capital leases . a charge to income resulting from the depreciation for assets held under capital leases is included within depreciation expense in our consolidated statements of income . future minimum lease payments for operating and capital leases with initial or remaining non-cancelable lease terms in excess of one year as of december 31 , 2010 , were as follows : millions operating leases capital leases .
|millions|operatingleases|capitalleases|
|2011|$ 613|$ 311|
|2012|526|251|
|2013|461|253|
|2014|382|261|
|2015|340|262|
|later years|2599|1355|
|total minimum lease payments|$ 4921|$ 2693|
|amount representing interest|n/a|-784 ( 784 )|
|present value of minimum lease payments|n/a|$ 1909|
the majority of capital lease payments relate to locomotives . rent expense for operating leases with terms exceeding one month was $ 624 million in 2010 , $ 686 million in 2009 , and $ 747 million in 2008 . when cash rental payments are not made on a straight-line basis , we recognize variable rental expense on a straight-line basis over the lease term . contingent rentals and sub-rentals are not significant. .
Question: in 2010 what was the percent of the early extinguishment charge to the amount of the outstanding 6.65% ( 6.65 % ) notes due january 15 , 2011 |
Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: five-year performance comparison 2013 the following graph provides an indicator of cumulative total shareholder returns for the corporation as compared to the peer group index ( described above ) , the dj trans , and the s&p 500 . the graph assumes that $ 100 was invested in the common stock of union pacific corporation and each index on december 31 , 2008 and that all dividends were reinvested . the information below is historical in nature and is not necessarily indicative of future performance . purchases of equity securities 2013 during 2013 , we repurchased 14996957 shares of our common stock at an average price of $ 152.14 . the following table presents common stock repurchases during each month for the fourth quarter of 2013 : period total number of shares purchased [a] average price paid per share total number of shares purchased as part of a publicly announced plan or program [b] maximum number of shares that may yet be purchased under the plan or program [b] .
|period|total number ofsharespurchased [a]|averageprice paidper share|total number of sharespurchased as part ofapublicly announced planor program [b]|maximum number ofshares that may yetbe purchased under the planor program [b]|
|oct . 1 through oct . 31|1405535|153.18|1405535|4020650|
|nov . 1 through nov . 30|1027840|158.66|1025000|2995650|
|dec . 1 through dec . 31|2500944|163.14|2498520|497130|
|total|4934319|$ 159.37|4929055|n/a|
[a] total number of shares purchased during the quarter includes approximately 5264 shares delivered or attested to upc by employees to pay stock option exercise prices , satisfy excess tax withholding obligations for stock option exercises or vesting of retention units , and pay withholding obligations for vesting of retention shares . [b] on april 1 , 2011 , our board of directors authorized the repurchase of up to 40 million shares of our common stock by march 31 , 2014 . these repurchases may be made on the open market or through other transactions . our management has sole discretion with respect to determining the timing and amount of these transactions . on november 21 , 2013 , the board of directors approved the early renewal of the share repurchase program , authorizing the repurchase of 60 million common shares by december 31 , 2017 . the new authorization is effective january 1 , 2014 , and replaces the previous authorization , which expired on december 31 , 2013 , three months earlier than its original expiration date. .
Question: what was the percent of the total number of share repurchase in the fourth quarter of 2013 that was attested to upc by employees to pay stock option exercise prices | 0.00107 | ### Transformed FinQA Question Generation Instructions
#### Step 1: Analyze and Understand the Original FinQA Question
- Objective: Use the given FinQA question to generate a new, logically similar but numerically different question.
- Guidelines:
- Identify the financial concepts and quantitative reasoning in the original question.
- Determine the key variables (e.g., revenue, profit, growth rate, interest) and their relationships.
- Maintain the original question’s structure and complexity.
#### Step 2: Transform and Adapt
- Objective: Create a new FinQA-style question while modifying numerical values and conditions.
- Guidelines:
- Change financial figures, constraints, or business conditions to create a unique question.
- Ensure the transformation maintains financial realism (e.g., realistic market trends, interest rates).
- Retain the original reasoning and computational steps while introducing fresh data points.
#### Step 3: Generate the New FinQA Question
- Objective: Output an original, transformed FinQA question without providing an answer or solution.
- Guidelines:
- Ensure the new question aligns with FinQA’s format and complexity.
- Maintain clarity and well-defined financial relationships.
### Response Rule
- **Generate only the "Transformed FinQA Question" for the given example without including any answer, explanation, or solution.**
### Output Format
#### Transformed FinQA Question: [Write your transformed FinQA question here.]
----
#### Task
#### Original FinQA Question: Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: five-year performance comparison 2013 the following graph provides an indicator of cumulative total shareholder returns for the corporation as compared to the peer group index ( described above ) , the dj trans , and the s&p 500 . the graph assumes that $ 100 was invested in the common stock of union pacific corporation and each index on december 31 , 2008 and that all dividends were reinvested . the information below is historical in nature and is not necessarily indicative of future performance . purchases of equity securities 2013 during 2013 , we repurchased 14996957 shares of our common stock at an average price of $ 152.14 . the following table presents common stock repurchases during each month for the fourth quarter of 2013 : period total number of shares purchased [a] average price paid per share total number of shares purchased as part of a publicly announced plan or program [b] maximum number of shares that may yet be purchased under the plan or program [b] .
|period|total number ofsharespurchased [a]|averageprice paidper share|total number of sharespurchased as part ofapublicly announced planor program [b]|maximum number ofshares that may yetbe purchased under the planor program [b]|
|oct . 1 through oct . 31|1405535|153.18|1405535|4020650|
|nov . 1 through nov . 30|1027840|158.66|1025000|2995650|
|dec . 1 through dec . 31|2500944|163.14|2498520|497130|
|total|4934319|$ 159.37|4929055|n/a|
[a] total number of shares purchased during the quarter includes approximately 5264 shares delivered or attested to upc by employees to pay stock option exercise prices , satisfy excess tax withholding obligations for stock option exercises or vesting of retention units , and pay withholding obligations for vesting of retention shares . [b] on april 1 , 2011 , our board of directors authorized the repurchase of up to 40 million shares of our common stock by march 31 , 2014 . these repurchases may be made on the open market or through other transactions . our management has sole discretion with respect to determining the timing and amount of these transactions . on november 21 , 2013 , the board of directors approved the early renewal of the share repurchase program , authorizing the repurchase of 60 million common shares by december 31 , 2017 . the new authorization is effective january 1 , 2014 , and replaces the previous authorization , which expired on december 31 , 2013 , three months earlier than its original expiration date. .
Question: what was the percent of the total number of share repurchase in the fourth quarter of 2013 that was attested to upc by employees to pay stock option exercise prices |
Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: abiomed , inc . and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) note 8 . goodwill and in-process research and development ( continued ) the company has no accumulated impairment losses on goodwill . the company performed a step 0 qualitative assessment during the annual impairment review for fiscal 2015 as of october 31 , 2014 and concluded that it is not more likely than not that the fair value of the company 2019s single reporting unit is less than its carrying amount . therefore , the two-step goodwill impairment test for the reporting unit was not necessary in fiscal 2015 . as described in note 3 . 201cacquisitions , 201d in july 2014 , the company acquired ecp and ais and recorded $ 18.5 million of ipr&d . the estimated fair value of the ipr&d was determined using a probability-weighted income approach , which discounts expected future cash flows to present value . the projected cash flows from the expandable catheter pump technology were based on certain key assumptions , including estimates of future revenue and expenses , taking into account the stage of development of the technology at the acquisition date and the time and resources needed to complete development . the company used a discount rate of 22.5% ( 22.5 % ) and cash flows that have been probability adjusted to reflect the risks of product commercialization , which the company believes are appropriate and representative of market participant assumptions . the carrying value of the company 2019s ipr&d assets and the change in the balance for the year ended march 31 , 2015 is as follows : march 31 , ( in $ 000 2019s ) .
||march 31 2015 ( in $ 000 2019s )|
|beginning balance|$ 2014|
|additions|18500|
|foreign currency translation impact|-3789 ( 3789 )|
|ending balance|$ 14711|
note 9 . stockholders 2019 equity class b preferred stock the company has authorized 1000000 shares of class b preferred stock , $ .01 par value , of which the board of directors can set the designation , rights and privileges . no shares of class b preferred stock have been issued or are outstanding . stock repurchase program in november 2012 , the company 2019s board of directors authorized a stock repurchase program for up to $ 15.0 million of its common stock . the company financed the stock repurchase program with its available cash . during the year ended march 31 , 2013 , the company repurchased 1123587 shares for $ 15.0 million in open market purchases at an average cost of $ 13.39 per share , including commission expense . the company completed the purchase of common stock under this stock repurchase program in january 2013 . note 10 . stock award plans and stock-based compensation stock award plans the company grants stock options and restricted stock awards to employees and others . all outstanding stock options of the company as of march 31 , 2015 were granted with an exercise price equal to the fair market value on the date of grant . outstanding stock options , if not exercised , expire 10 years from the date of grant . the company 2019s 2008 stock incentive plan ( the 201cplan 201d ) authorizes the grant of a variety of equity awards to the company 2019s officers , directors , employees , consultants and advisers , including awards of unrestricted and restricted stock , restricted stock units , incentive and nonqualified stock options to purchase shares of common stock , performance share awards and stock appreciation rights . the plan provides that options may only be granted at the current market value on the date of grant . each share of stock issued pursuant to a stock option or stock appreciation right counts as one share against the maximum number of shares issuable under the plan , while each share of stock issued .
Question: assuming the same impact of foreign currency translation as in the fiscal year 2015 , what would be the ending balance of in process \\nr&d assets in fiscal 2016? | 10922000.0 | ### Transformed FinQA Question Generation Instructions
#### Step 1: Analyze and Understand the Original FinQA Question
- Objective: Use the given FinQA question to generate a new, logically similar but numerically different question.
- Guidelines:
- Identify the financial concepts and quantitative reasoning in the original question.
- Determine the key variables (e.g., revenue, profit, growth rate, interest) and their relationships.
- Maintain the original question’s structure and complexity.
#### Step 2: Transform and Adapt
- Objective: Create a new FinQA-style question while modifying numerical values and conditions.
- Guidelines:
- Change financial figures, constraints, or business conditions to create a unique question.
- Ensure the transformation maintains financial realism (e.g., realistic market trends, interest rates).
- Retain the original reasoning and computational steps while introducing fresh data points.
#### Step 3: Generate the New FinQA Question
- Objective: Output an original, transformed FinQA question without providing an answer or solution.
- Guidelines:
- Ensure the new question aligns with FinQA’s format and complexity.
- Maintain clarity and well-defined financial relationships.
### Response Rule
- **Generate only the "Transformed FinQA Question" for the given example without including any answer, explanation, or solution.**
### Output Format
#### Transformed FinQA Question: [Write your transformed FinQA question here.]
----
#### Task
#### Original FinQA Question: Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: abiomed , inc . and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) note 8 . goodwill and in-process research and development ( continued ) the company has no accumulated impairment losses on goodwill . the company performed a step 0 qualitative assessment during the annual impairment review for fiscal 2015 as of october 31 , 2014 and concluded that it is not more likely than not that the fair value of the company 2019s single reporting unit is less than its carrying amount . therefore , the two-step goodwill impairment test for the reporting unit was not necessary in fiscal 2015 . as described in note 3 . 201cacquisitions , 201d in july 2014 , the company acquired ecp and ais and recorded $ 18.5 million of ipr&d . the estimated fair value of the ipr&d was determined using a probability-weighted income approach , which discounts expected future cash flows to present value . the projected cash flows from the expandable catheter pump technology were based on certain key assumptions , including estimates of future revenue and expenses , taking into account the stage of development of the technology at the acquisition date and the time and resources needed to complete development . the company used a discount rate of 22.5% ( 22.5 % ) and cash flows that have been probability adjusted to reflect the risks of product commercialization , which the company believes are appropriate and representative of market participant assumptions . the carrying value of the company 2019s ipr&d assets and the change in the balance for the year ended march 31 , 2015 is as follows : march 31 , ( in $ 000 2019s ) .
||march 31 2015 ( in $ 000 2019s )|
|beginning balance|$ 2014|
|additions|18500|
|foreign currency translation impact|-3789 ( 3789 )|
|ending balance|$ 14711|
note 9 . stockholders 2019 equity class b preferred stock the company has authorized 1000000 shares of class b preferred stock , $ .01 par value , of which the board of directors can set the designation , rights and privileges . no shares of class b preferred stock have been issued or are outstanding . stock repurchase program in november 2012 , the company 2019s board of directors authorized a stock repurchase program for up to $ 15.0 million of its common stock . the company financed the stock repurchase program with its available cash . during the year ended march 31 , 2013 , the company repurchased 1123587 shares for $ 15.0 million in open market purchases at an average cost of $ 13.39 per share , including commission expense . the company completed the purchase of common stock under this stock repurchase program in january 2013 . note 10 . stock award plans and stock-based compensation stock award plans the company grants stock options and restricted stock awards to employees and others . all outstanding stock options of the company as of march 31 , 2015 were granted with an exercise price equal to the fair market value on the date of grant . outstanding stock options , if not exercised , expire 10 years from the date of grant . the company 2019s 2008 stock incentive plan ( the 201cplan 201d ) authorizes the grant of a variety of equity awards to the company 2019s officers , directors , employees , consultants and advisers , including awards of unrestricted and restricted stock , restricted stock units , incentive and nonqualified stock options to purchase shares of common stock , performance share awards and stock appreciation rights . the plan provides that options may only be granted at the current market value on the date of grant . each share of stock issued pursuant to a stock option or stock appreciation right counts as one share against the maximum number of shares issuable under the plan , while each share of stock issued .
Question: assuming the same impact of foreign currency translation as in the fiscal year 2015 , what would be the ending balance of in process \\nr&d assets in fiscal 2016? |
Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: mastercard incorporated notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) ( in thousands , except percent and per share data ) the following table summarizes expected benefit payments through 2019 for the pension plans , including those payments expected to be paid from the company 2019s general assets . since the majority of the benefit payments are made in the form of lump-sum distributions , actual benefit payments may differ from expected benefit payments. .
|2010|$ 18181|
|2011|27090|
|2012|21548|
|2013|25513|
|2014|24002|
|2015-2019|128494|
substantially all of the company 2019s u.s . employees are eligible to participate in a defined contribution savings plan ( the 201csavings plan 201d ) sponsored by the company . the savings plan allows employees to contribute a portion of their base compensation on a pre-tax and after-tax basis in accordance with specified guidelines . the company matches a percentage of employees 2019 contributions up to certain limits . in 2007 and prior years , the company could also contribute to the savings plan a discretionary profit sharing component linked to company performance during the prior year . beginning in 2008 , the discretionary profit sharing amount related to prior year company performance was paid directly to employees as a short-term cash incentive bonus rather than as a contribution to the savings plan . in addition , the company has several defined contribution plans outside of the united states . the company 2019s contribution expense related to all of its defined contribution plans was $ 40627 , $ 35341 and $ 26996 for 2009 , 2008 and 2007 , respectively . note 13 . postemployment and postretirement benefits the company maintains a postretirement plan ( the 201cpostretirement plan 201d ) providing health coverage and life insurance benefits for substantially all of its u.s . employees hired before july 1 , 2007 . the company amended the life insurance benefits under the postretirement plan effective january 1 , 2007 . the impact , net of taxes , of this amendment was an increase of $ 1715 to accumulated other comprehensive income in 2007 . in 2009 , the company recorded a $ 3944 benefit expense as a result of enhanced postretirement medical benefits under the postretirement plan provided to employees that chose to participate in a voluntary transition program. .
Question: what is the increase observed in the expected benefit payments during 2012 and 2013? | 0.18401 | ### Transformed FinQA Question Generation Instructions
#### Step 1: Analyze and Understand the Original FinQA Question
- Objective: Use the given FinQA question to generate a new, logically similar but numerically different question.
- Guidelines:
- Identify the financial concepts and quantitative reasoning in the original question.
- Determine the key variables (e.g., revenue, profit, growth rate, interest) and their relationships.
- Maintain the original question’s structure and complexity.
#### Step 2: Transform and Adapt
- Objective: Create a new FinQA-style question while modifying numerical values and conditions.
- Guidelines:
- Change financial figures, constraints, or business conditions to create a unique question.
- Ensure the transformation maintains financial realism (e.g., realistic market trends, interest rates).
- Retain the original reasoning and computational steps while introducing fresh data points.
#### Step 3: Generate the New FinQA Question
- Objective: Output an original, transformed FinQA question without providing an answer or solution.
- Guidelines:
- Ensure the new question aligns with FinQA’s format and complexity.
- Maintain clarity and well-defined financial relationships.
### Response Rule
- **Generate only the "Transformed FinQA Question" for the given example without including any answer, explanation, or solution.**
### Output Format
#### Transformed FinQA Question: [Write your transformed FinQA question here.]
----
#### Task
#### Original FinQA Question: Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: mastercard incorporated notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) ( in thousands , except percent and per share data ) the following table summarizes expected benefit payments through 2019 for the pension plans , including those payments expected to be paid from the company 2019s general assets . since the majority of the benefit payments are made in the form of lump-sum distributions , actual benefit payments may differ from expected benefit payments. .
|2010|$ 18181|
|2011|27090|
|2012|21548|
|2013|25513|
|2014|24002|
|2015-2019|128494|
substantially all of the company 2019s u.s . employees are eligible to participate in a defined contribution savings plan ( the 201csavings plan 201d ) sponsored by the company . the savings plan allows employees to contribute a portion of their base compensation on a pre-tax and after-tax basis in accordance with specified guidelines . the company matches a percentage of employees 2019 contributions up to certain limits . in 2007 and prior years , the company could also contribute to the savings plan a discretionary profit sharing component linked to company performance during the prior year . beginning in 2008 , the discretionary profit sharing amount related to prior year company performance was paid directly to employees as a short-term cash incentive bonus rather than as a contribution to the savings plan . in addition , the company has several defined contribution plans outside of the united states . the company 2019s contribution expense related to all of its defined contribution plans was $ 40627 , $ 35341 and $ 26996 for 2009 , 2008 and 2007 , respectively . note 13 . postemployment and postretirement benefits the company maintains a postretirement plan ( the 201cpostretirement plan 201d ) providing health coverage and life insurance benefits for substantially all of its u.s . employees hired before july 1 , 2007 . the company amended the life insurance benefits under the postretirement plan effective january 1 , 2007 . the impact , net of taxes , of this amendment was an increase of $ 1715 to accumulated other comprehensive income in 2007 . in 2009 , the company recorded a $ 3944 benefit expense as a result of enhanced postretirement medical benefits under the postretirement plan provided to employees that chose to participate in a voluntary transition program. .
Question: what is the increase observed in the expected benefit payments during 2012 and 2013? |
Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: f0b7 positive train control 2013 in response to a legislative mandate to implement ptc , we expect to spend approximately $ 450 million during 2013 on developing and deploying ptc . we currently estimate that ptc , in accordance with implementing rules issued by the federal rail administration ( fra ) , will cost us approximately $ 2 billion by the end of the project . this includes costs for installing the new system along our tracks , upgrading locomotives to work with the new system , and adding digital data communication equipment to integrate the components of the system . f0b7 financial expectations 2013 we are cautious about the economic environment but if industrial production grows approximately 2% ( 2 % ) as projected , volume should exceed 2012 levels . even with no volume growth , we expect earnings to exceed 2012 earnings , generated by real core pricing gains , on-going network improvements and operational productivity initiatives . we also expect that a new bonus depreciation program under federal tax laws will positively impact cash flows in 2013 . results of operations operating revenues millions 2012 2011 2010 % ( % ) change 2012 v 2011 % ( % ) change 2011 v 2010 .
|millions|2012|2011|2010|% ( % ) change 2012 v 2011|% ( % ) change 2011 v 2010|
|freight revenues|$ 19686|$ 18508|$ 16069|6% ( 6 % )|15% ( 15 % )|
|other revenues|1240|1049|896|18|17|
|total|$ 20926|$ 19557|$ 16965|7% ( 7 % )|15% ( 15 % )|
we generate freight revenues by transporting freight or other materials from our six commodity groups . freight revenues vary with volume ( carloads ) and average revenue per car ( arc ) . changes in price , traffic mix and fuel surcharges drive arc . we provide some of our customers with contractual incentives for meeting or exceeding specified cumulative volumes or shipping to and from specific locations , which we record as reductions to freight revenues based on the actual or projected future shipments . we recognize freight revenues as shipments move from origin to destination . we allocate freight revenues between reporting periods based on the relative transit time in each reporting period and recognize expenses as we incur them . other revenues include revenues earned by our subsidiaries , revenues from our commuter rail operations , and accessorial revenues , which we earn when customers retain equipment owned or controlled by us or when we perform additional services such as switching or storage . we recognize other revenues as we perform services or meet contractual obligations . freight revenues from four of our six commodity groups increased during 2012 compared to 2011 . revenues from coal and agricultural products declined during the year . our franchise diversity allowed us to take advantage of growth from shale-related markets ( crude oil , frac sand and pipe ) and strong automotive manufacturing , which offset volume declines from coal and agricultural products . arc increased 7% ( 7 % ) , driven by core pricing gains and higher fuel cost recoveries . improved fuel recovery provisions and higher fuel prices , including the lag effect of our programs ( surcharges trail fluctuations in fuel price by approximately two months ) , combined to increase revenues from fuel surcharges . freight revenues for all six commodity groups increased during 2011 compared to 2010 , while volume increased in all commodity groups except intermodal . increased demand in many market sectors , with particularly strong growth in chemicals , industrial products , and automotive shipments for the year , generated the increases . arc increased 12% ( 12 % ) , driven by higher fuel cost recoveries and core pricing gains . fuel cost recoveries include fuel surcharge revenue and the impact of resetting the base fuel price for certain traffic . higher fuel prices , volume growth , and new fuel surcharge provisions in renegotiated contracts all combined to increase revenues from fuel surcharges . our fuel surcharge programs ( excluding index-based contract escalators that contain some provision for fuel ) generated freight revenues of $ 2.6 billion , $ 2.2 billion , and $ 1.2 billion in 2012 , 2011 , and 2010 , respectively . ongoing rising fuel prices and increased fuel surcharge coverage drove the increases . additionally , fuel surcharge revenue is not entirely comparable to prior periods as we continue to convert portions of our non-regulated traffic to mileage-based fuel surcharge programs. .
Question: if freight revenues increase at the same rate as 2012 , what would expected 2013 revenues be , in millions? | 19686.06 | ### Transformed FinQA Question Generation Instructions
#### Step 1: Analyze and Understand the Original FinQA Question
- Objective: Use the given FinQA question to generate a new, logically similar but numerically different question.
- Guidelines:
- Identify the financial concepts and quantitative reasoning in the original question.
- Determine the key variables (e.g., revenue, profit, growth rate, interest) and their relationships.
- Maintain the original question’s structure and complexity.
#### Step 2: Transform and Adapt
- Objective: Create a new FinQA-style question while modifying numerical values and conditions.
- Guidelines:
- Change financial figures, constraints, or business conditions to create a unique question.
- Ensure the transformation maintains financial realism (e.g., realistic market trends, interest rates).
- Retain the original reasoning and computational steps while introducing fresh data points.
#### Step 3: Generate the New FinQA Question
- Objective: Output an original, transformed FinQA question without providing an answer or solution.
- Guidelines:
- Ensure the new question aligns with FinQA’s format and complexity.
- Maintain clarity and well-defined financial relationships.
### Response Rule
- **Generate only the "Transformed FinQA Question" for the given example without including any answer, explanation, or solution.**
### Output Format
#### Transformed FinQA Question: [Write your transformed FinQA question here.]
----
#### Task
#### Original FinQA Question: Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: f0b7 positive train control 2013 in response to a legislative mandate to implement ptc , we expect to spend approximately $ 450 million during 2013 on developing and deploying ptc . we currently estimate that ptc , in accordance with implementing rules issued by the federal rail administration ( fra ) , will cost us approximately $ 2 billion by the end of the project . this includes costs for installing the new system along our tracks , upgrading locomotives to work with the new system , and adding digital data communication equipment to integrate the components of the system . f0b7 financial expectations 2013 we are cautious about the economic environment but if industrial production grows approximately 2% ( 2 % ) as projected , volume should exceed 2012 levels . even with no volume growth , we expect earnings to exceed 2012 earnings , generated by real core pricing gains , on-going network improvements and operational productivity initiatives . we also expect that a new bonus depreciation program under federal tax laws will positively impact cash flows in 2013 . results of operations operating revenues millions 2012 2011 2010 % ( % ) change 2012 v 2011 % ( % ) change 2011 v 2010 .
|millions|2012|2011|2010|% ( % ) change 2012 v 2011|% ( % ) change 2011 v 2010|
|freight revenues|$ 19686|$ 18508|$ 16069|6% ( 6 % )|15% ( 15 % )|
|other revenues|1240|1049|896|18|17|
|total|$ 20926|$ 19557|$ 16965|7% ( 7 % )|15% ( 15 % )|
we generate freight revenues by transporting freight or other materials from our six commodity groups . freight revenues vary with volume ( carloads ) and average revenue per car ( arc ) . changes in price , traffic mix and fuel surcharges drive arc . we provide some of our customers with contractual incentives for meeting or exceeding specified cumulative volumes or shipping to and from specific locations , which we record as reductions to freight revenues based on the actual or projected future shipments . we recognize freight revenues as shipments move from origin to destination . we allocate freight revenues between reporting periods based on the relative transit time in each reporting period and recognize expenses as we incur them . other revenues include revenues earned by our subsidiaries , revenues from our commuter rail operations , and accessorial revenues , which we earn when customers retain equipment owned or controlled by us or when we perform additional services such as switching or storage . we recognize other revenues as we perform services or meet contractual obligations . freight revenues from four of our six commodity groups increased during 2012 compared to 2011 . revenues from coal and agricultural products declined during the year . our franchise diversity allowed us to take advantage of growth from shale-related markets ( crude oil , frac sand and pipe ) and strong automotive manufacturing , which offset volume declines from coal and agricultural products . arc increased 7% ( 7 % ) , driven by core pricing gains and higher fuel cost recoveries . improved fuel recovery provisions and higher fuel prices , including the lag effect of our programs ( surcharges trail fluctuations in fuel price by approximately two months ) , combined to increase revenues from fuel surcharges . freight revenues for all six commodity groups increased during 2011 compared to 2010 , while volume increased in all commodity groups except intermodal . increased demand in many market sectors , with particularly strong growth in chemicals , industrial products , and automotive shipments for the year , generated the increases . arc increased 12% ( 12 % ) , driven by higher fuel cost recoveries and core pricing gains . fuel cost recoveries include fuel surcharge revenue and the impact of resetting the base fuel price for certain traffic . higher fuel prices , volume growth , and new fuel surcharge provisions in renegotiated contracts all combined to increase revenues from fuel surcharges . our fuel surcharge programs ( excluding index-based contract escalators that contain some provision for fuel ) generated freight revenues of $ 2.6 billion , $ 2.2 billion , and $ 1.2 billion in 2012 , 2011 , and 2010 , respectively . ongoing rising fuel prices and increased fuel surcharge coverage drove the increases . additionally , fuel surcharge revenue is not entirely comparable to prior periods as we continue to convert portions of our non-regulated traffic to mileage-based fuel surcharge programs. .
Question: if freight revenues increase at the same rate as 2012 , what would expected 2013 revenues be , in millions? |
Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: item 2 : properties information concerning applied 2019s properties is set forth below: .
|( square feet in thousands )|united states|other countries|total|
|owned|4530|2417|6947|
|leased|1037|1341|2378|
|total|5567|3758|9325|
because of the interrelation of applied 2019s operations , properties within a country may be shared by the segments operating within that country . the company 2019s headquarters offices are in santa clara , california . products in semiconductor systems are manufactured in santa clara , california ; austin , texas ; gloucester , massachusetts ; kalispell , montana ; rehovot , israel ; and singapore . remanufactured equipment products in the applied global services segment are produced primarily in austin , texas . products in the display and adjacent markets segment are manufactured in alzenau , germany and tainan , taiwan . other products are manufactured in treviso , italy . applied also owns and leases offices , plants and warehouse locations in many locations throughout the world , including in europe , japan , north america ( principally the united states ) , israel , china , india , korea , southeast asia and taiwan . these facilities are principally used for manufacturing ; research , development and engineering ; and marketing , sales and customer support . applied also owns a total of approximately 269 acres of buildable land in montana , texas , california , israel and italy that could accommodate additional building space . applied considers the properties that it owns or leases as adequate to meet its current and future requirements . applied regularly assesses the size , capability and location of its global infrastructure and periodically makes adjustments based on these assessments. .
Question: what percentage of buildings are owned in the united states by the company? | 0.81372 | ### Transformed FinQA Question Generation Instructions
#### Step 1: Analyze and Understand the Original FinQA Question
- Objective: Use the given FinQA question to generate a new, logically similar but numerically different question.
- Guidelines:
- Identify the financial concepts and quantitative reasoning in the original question.
- Determine the key variables (e.g., revenue, profit, growth rate, interest) and their relationships.
- Maintain the original question’s structure and complexity.
#### Step 2: Transform and Adapt
- Objective: Create a new FinQA-style question while modifying numerical values and conditions.
- Guidelines:
- Change financial figures, constraints, or business conditions to create a unique question.
- Ensure the transformation maintains financial realism (e.g., realistic market trends, interest rates).
- Retain the original reasoning and computational steps while introducing fresh data points.
#### Step 3: Generate the New FinQA Question
- Objective: Output an original, transformed FinQA question without providing an answer or solution.
- Guidelines:
- Ensure the new question aligns with FinQA’s format and complexity.
- Maintain clarity and well-defined financial relationships.
### Response Rule
- **Generate only the "Transformed FinQA Question" for the given example without including any answer, explanation, or solution.**
### Output Format
#### Transformed FinQA Question: [Write your transformed FinQA question here.]
----
#### Task
#### Original FinQA Question: Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: item 2 : properties information concerning applied 2019s properties is set forth below: .
|( square feet in thousands )|united states|other countries|total|
|owned|4530|2417|6947|
|leased|1037|1341|2378|
|total|5567|3758|9325|
because of the interrelation of applied 2019s operations , properties within a country may be shared by the segments operating within that country . the company 2019s headquarters offices are in santa clara , california . products in semiconductor systems are manufactured in santa clara , california ; austin , texas ; gloucester , massachusetts ; kalispell , montana ; rehovot , israel ; and singapore . remanufactured equipment products in the applied global services segment are produced primarily in austin , texas . products in the display and adjacent markets segment are manufactured in alzenau , germany and tainan , taiwan . other products are manufactured in treviso , italy . applied also owns and leases offices , plants and warehouse locations in many locations throughout the world , including in europe , japan , north america ( principally the united states ) , israel , china , india , korea , southeast asia and taiwan . these facilities are principally used for manufacturing ; research , development and engineering ; and marketing , sales and customer support . applied also owns a total of approximately 269 acres of buildable land in montana , texas , california , israel and italy that could accommodate additional building space . applied considers the properties that it owns or leases as adequate to meet its current and future requirements . applied regularly assesses the size , capability and location of its global infrastructure and periodically makes adjustments based on these assessments. .
Question: what percentage of buildings are owned in the united states by the company? |
Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: our wholesale segment our wholesale segment sells our products to leading upscale and certain mid-tier department stores , specialty stores , and golf and pro shops , both domestically and internationally . we have continued to focus on elevating our brand by improving in- store product assortment and presentation , as well as full-price sell-throughs to consumers . as of the end of fiscal 2014 , our ralph lauren-branded products were sold through over 11000 doors worldwide and we invested $ 53 million of capital in related shop- within-shops primarily in domestic and international department and specialty stores . our products are also sold through the e- commerce sites of certain of our wholesale customers . the primary product offerings sold through our wholesale channels of distribution include menswear , womenswear , childrenswear , accessories , and home furnishings . our collection brands 2014 ralph lauren women's collection and black label and men's purple label and black label 2014 are distributed worldwide through a limited number of premier fashion retailers . department stores are our major wholesale customers in north america . in latin america , our wholesale products are sold in department stores and specialty stores . in europe , our wholesale sales are a varying mix of sales to both department stores and specialty stores , depending on the country . in japan , our wholesale products are distributed primarily through shop-within-shops at premier and top-tier department stores , and the mix of business is weighted to men's and women's blue label . in the greater china and southeast asia region and australia , our wholesale products are sold mainly at mid and top-tier department stores , and the mix of business is primarily weighted to men's and women's blue label . we also distribute product to certain licensed stores operated by our partners in latin america , europe , and asia . in addition , our club monaco products are distributed through select department stores and specialty stores in europe . we sell the majority of our excess and out-of-season products through secondary distribution channels worldwide , including our retail factory stores . worldwide distribution channels the following table presents the number of doors by geographic location in which ralph lauren-branded products distributed by our wholesale segment were sold to consumers in our primary channels of distribution as of march 29 , 2014: .
|location|number of doors|
|the americas ( a )|6459|
|europe|4864|
|asia ( b )|130|
|total|11453|
( a ) includes the u.s. , canada , and latin america . ( b ) includes australia , china , japan , the philippines , and thailand . in addition , chaps-branded products distributed by our wholesale segment were sold domestically through approximately 2800 doors as of march 29 , 2014 . we have three key wholesale customers that generate significant sales volume . for fiscal 2014 , these customers in the aggregate accounted for approximately 50% ( 50 % ) of our total wholesale revenues , with macy's , inc . ( "macy's" ) representing approximately 25% ( 25 % ) of our total wholesale revenues . our products are sold primarily through our own sales forces . our wholesale segment maintains its primary showrooms in new york city . in addition , we maintain regional showrooms in milan , paris , london , munich , madrid , stockholm , and panama . shop-within-shops . as a critical element of our distribution to department stores , we and our licensing partners utilize shop-within-shops to enhance brand recognition , to permit more complete merchandising of our lines by the department stores , and to differentiate the presentation of our products . as of march 29 , 2014 , we had approximately 22000 shop-within-shops in our primary channels of distribution dedicated to our ralph lauren-branded wholesale products worldwide . the size of our shop-within-shops ranges from approximately 100 to 9200 square feet . shop-within-shop fixed assets primarily include items such as customized freestanding fixtures , wall cases .
Question: what percentage of doors in the wholesale segment as of march 29 , 2014 where in the americas? | 0.56396 | ### Transformed FinQA Question Generation Instructions
#### Step 1: Analyze and Understand the Original FinQA Question
- Objective: Use the given FinQA question to generate a new, logically similar but numerically different question.
- Guidelines:
- Identify the financial concepts and quantitative reasoning in the original question.
- Determine the key variables (e.g., revenue, profit, growth rate, interest) and their relationships.
- Maintain the original question’s structure and complexity.
#### Step 2: Transform and Adapt
- Objective: Create a new FinQA-style question while modifying numerical values and conditions.
- Guidelines:
- Change financial figures, constraints, or business conditions to create a unique question.
- Ensure the transformation maintains financial realism (e.g., realistic market trends, interest rates).
- Retain the original reasoning and computational steps while introducing fresh data points.
#### Step 3: Generate the New FinQA Question
- Objective: Output an original, transformed FinQA question without providing an answer or solution.
- Guidelines:
- Ensure the new question aligns with FinQA’s format and complexity.
- Maintain clarity and well-defined financial relationships.
### Response Rule
- **Generate only the "Transformed FinQA Question" for the given example without including any answer, explanation, or solution.**
### Output Format
#### Transformed FinQA Question: [Write your transformed FinQA question here.]
----
#### Task
#### Original FinQA Question: Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: our wholesale segment our wholesale segment sells our products to leading upscale and certain mid-tier department stores , specialty stores , and golf and pro shops , both domestically and internationally . we have continued to focus on elevating our brand by improving in- store product assortment and presentation , as well as full-price sell-throughs to consumers . as of the end of fiscal 2014 , our ralph lauren-branded products were sold through over 11000 doors worldwide and we invested $ 53 million of capital in related shop- within-shops primarily in domestic and international department and specialty stores . our products are also sold through the e- commerce sites of certain of our wholesale customers . the primary product offerings sold through our wholesale channels of distribution include menswear , womenswear , childrenswear , accessories , and home furnishings . our collection brands 2014 ralph lauren women's collection and black label and men's purple label and black label 2014 are distributed worldwide through a limited number of premier fashion retailers . department stores are our major wholesale customers in north america . in latin america , our wholesale products are sold in department stores and specialty stores . in europe , our wholesale sales are a varying mix of sales to both department stores and specialty stores , depending on the country . in japan , our wholesale products are distributed primarily through shop-within-shops at premier and top-tier department stores , and the mix of business is weighted to men's and women's blue label . in the greater china and southeast asia region and australia , our wholesale products are sold mainly at mid and top-tier department stores , and the mix of business is primarily weighted to men's and women's blue label . we also distribute product to certain licensed stores operated by our partners in latin america , europe , and asia . in addition , our club monaco products are distributed through select department stores and specialty stores in europe . we sell the majority of our excess and out-of-season products through secondary distribution channels worldwide , including our retail factory stores . worldwide distribution channels the following table presents the number of doors by geographic location in which ralph lauren-branded products distributed by our wholesale segment were sold to consumers in our primary channels of distribution as of march 29 , 2014: .
|location|number of doors|
|the americas ( a )|6459|
|europe|4864|
|asia ( b )|130|
|total|11453|
( a ) includes the u.s. , canada , and latin america . ( b ) includes australia , china , japan , the philippines , and thailand . in addition , chaps-branded products distributed by our wholesale segment were sold domestically through approximately 2800 doors as of march 29 , 2014 . we have three key wholesale customers that generate significant sales volume . for fiscal 2014 , these customers in the aggregate accounted for approximately 50% ( 50 % ) of our total wholesale revenues , with macy's , inc . ( "macy's" ) representing approximately 25% ( 25 % ) of our total wholesale revenues . our products are sold primarily through our own sales forces . our wholesale segment maintains its primary showrooms in new york city . in addition , we maintain regional showrooms in milan , paris , london , munich , madrid , stockholm , and panama . shop-within-shops . as a critical element of our distribution to department stores , we and our licensing partners utilize shop-within-shops to enhance brand recognition , to permit more complete merchandising of our lines by the department stores , and to differentiate the presentation of our products . as of march 29 , 2014 , we had approximately 22000 shop-within-shops in our primary channels of distribution dedicated to our ralph lauren-branded wholesale products worldwide . the size of our shop-within-shops ranges from approximately 100 to 9200 square feet . shop-within-shop fixed assets primarily include items such as customized freestanding fixtures , wall cases .
Question: what percentage of doors in the wholesale segment as of march 29 , 2014 where in the americas? |
Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: jpmorgan chase & co./2014 annual report 125 lending-related commitments the firm uses lending-related financial instruments , such as commitments ( including revolving credit facilities ) and guarantees , to meet the financing needs of its customers . the contractual amounts of these financial instruments represent the maximum possible credit risk should the counterparties draw down on these commitments or the firm fulfills its obligations under these guarantees , and the counterparties subsequently fail to perform according to the terms of these contracts . in the firm 2019s view , the total contractual amount of these wholesale lending-related commitments is not representative of the firm 2019s actual future credit exposure or funding requirements . in determining the amount of credit risk exposure the firm has to wholesale lending-related commitments , which is used as the basis for allocating credit risk capital to these commitments , the firm has established a 201cloan-equivalent 201d amount for each commitment ; this amount represents the portion of the unused commitment or other contingent exposure that is expected , based on average portfolio historical experience , to become drawn upon in an event of a default by an obligor . the loan-equivalent amount of the firm 2019s lending- related commitments was $ 229.6 billion and $ 218.9 billion as of december 31 , 2014 and 2013 , respectively . clearing services the firm provides clearing services for clients entering into securities and derivative transactions . through the provision of these services the firm is exposed to the risk of non-performance by its clients and may be required to share in losses incurred by central counterparties ( 201cccps 201d ) . where possible , the firm seeks to mitigate its credit risk to its clients through the collection of adequate margin at inception and throughout the life of the transactions and can also cease provision of clearing services if clients do not adhere to their obligations under the clearing agreement . for further discussion of clearing services , see note 29 . derivative contracts in the normal course of business , the firm uses derivative instruments predominantly for market-making activities . derivatives enable customers to manage exposures to fluctuations in interest rates , currencies and other markets . the firm also uses derivative instruments to manage its own credit exposure . the nature of the counterparty and the settlement mechanism of the derivative affect the credit risk to which the firm is exposed . for otc derivatives the firm is exposed to the credit risk of the derivative counterparty . for exchange-traded derivatives ( 201cetd 201d ) such as futures and options , and 201ccleared 201d over-the-counter ( 201cotc-cleared 201d ) derivatives , the firm is generally exposed to the credit risk of the relevant ccp . where possible , the firm seeks to mitigate its credit risk exposures arising from derivative transactions through the use of legally enforceable master netting arrangements and collateral agreements . for further discussion of derivative contracts , counterparties and settlement types , see note 6 . the following table summarizes the net derivative receivables for the periods presented . derivative receivables .
|december 31 ( in millions )|2014|2013|
|interest rate|$ 33725|$ 25782|
|credit derivatives|1838|1516|
|foreign exchange|21253|16790|
|equity|8177|12227|
|commodity|13982|9444|
|total net of cash collateral|78975|65759|
|liquid securities and other cash collateral held against derivative receivables|-19604 ( 19604 )|-14435 ( 14435 )|
|total net of all collateral|$ 59371|$ 51324|
derivative receivables reported on the consolidated balance sheets were $ 79.0 billion and $ 65.8 billion at december 31 , 2014 and 2013 , respectively . these amounts represent the fair value of the derivative contracts , after giving effect to legally enforceable master netting agreements and cash collateral held by the firm . however , in management 2019s view , the appropriate measure of current credit risk should also take into consideration additional liquid securities ( primarily u.s . government and agency securities and other g7 government bonds ) and other cash collateral held by the firm aggregating $ 19.6 billion and $ 14.4 billion at december 31 , 2014 and 2013 , respectively , that may be used as security when the fair value of the client 2019s exposure is in the firm 2019s favor . in addition to the collateral described in the preceding paragraph , the firm also holds additional collateral ( primarily : cash ; g7 government securities ; other liquid government-agency and guaranteed securities ; and corporate debt and equity securities ) delivered by clients at the initiation of transactions , as well as collateral related to contracts that have a non-daily call frequency and collateral that the firm has agreed to return but has not yet settled as of the reporting date . although this collateral does not reduce the balances and is not included in the table above , it is available as security against potential exposure that could arise should the fair value of the client 2019s derivative transactions move in the firm 2019s favor . as of december 31 , 2014 and 2013 , the firm held $ 48.6 billion and $ 50.8 billion , respectively , of this additional collateral . the prior period amount has been revised to conform with the current period presentation . the derivative receivables fair value , net of all collateral , also does not include other credit enhancements , such as letters of credit . for additional information on the firm 2019s use of collateral agreements , see note 6. .
Question: what was the ratio of the derivative receivables reported on the consolidated balance sheets for 2014 to 2013 | 1.20061 | ### Transformed FinQA Question Generation Instructions
#### Step 1: Analyze and Understand the Original FinQA Question
- Objective: Use the given FinQA question to generate a new, logically similar but numerically different question.
- Guidelines:
- Identify the financial concepts and quantitative reasoning in the original question.
- Determine the key variables (e.g., revenue, profit, growth rate, interest) and their relationships.
- Maintain the original question’s structure and complexity.
#### Step 2: Transform and Adapt
- Objective: Create a new FinQA-style question while modifying numerical values and conditions.
- Guidelines:
- Change financial figures, constraints, or business conditions to create a unique question.
- Ensure the transformation maintains financial realism (e.g., realistic market trends, interest rates).
- Retain the original reasoning and computational steps while introducing fresh data points.
#### Step 3: Generate the New FinQA Question
- Objective: Output an original, transformed FinQA question without providing an answer or solution.
- Guidelines:
- Ensure the new question aligns with FinQA’s format and complexity.
- Maintain clarity and well-defined financial relationships.
### Response Rule
- **Generate only the "Transformed FinQA Question" for the given example without including any answer, explanation, or solution.**
### Output Format
#### Transformed FinQA Question: [Write your transformed FinQA question here.]
----
#### Task
#### Original FinQA Question: Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: jpmorgan chase & co./2014 annual report 125 lending-related commitments the firm uses lending-related financial instruments , such as commitments ( including revolving credit facilities ) and guarantees , to meet the financing needs of its customers . the contractual amounts of these financial instruments represent the maximum possible credit risk should the counterparties draw down on these commitments or the firm fulfills its obligations under these guarantees , and the counterparties subsequently fail to perform according to the terms of these contracts . in the firm 2019s view , the total contractual amount of these wholesale lending-related commitments is not representative of the firm 2019s actual future credit exposure or funding requirements . in determining the amount of credit risk exposure the firm has to wholesale lending-related commitments , which is used as the basis for allocating credit risk capital to these commitments , the firm has established a 201cloan-equivalent 201d amount for each commitment ; this amount represents the portion of the unused commitment or other contingent exposure that is expected , based on average portfolio historical experience , to become drawn upon in an event of a default by an obligor . the loan-equivalent amount of the firm 2019s lending- related commitments was $ 229.6 billion and $ 218.9 billion as of december 31 , 2014 and 2013 , respectively . clearing services the firm provides clearing services for clients entering into securities and derivative transactions . through the provision of these services the firm is exposed to the risk of non-performance by its clients and may be required to share in losses incurred by central counterparties ( 201cccps 201d ) . where possible , the firm seeks to mitigate its credit risk to its clients through the collection of adequate margin at inception and throughout the life of the transactions and can also cease provision of clearing services if clients do not adhere to their obligations under the clearing agreement . for further discussion of clearing services , see note 29 . derivative contracts in the normal course of business , the firm uses derivative instruments predominantly for market-making activities . derivatives enable customers to manage exposures to fluctuations in interest rates , currencies and other markets . the firm also uses derivative instruments to manage its own credit exposure . the nature of the counterparty and the settlement mechanism of the derivative affect the credit risk to which the firm is exposed . for otc derivatives the firm is exposed to the credit risk of the derivative counterparty . for exchange-traded derivatives ( 201cetd 201d ) such as futures and options , and 201ccleared 201d over-the-counter ( 201cotc-cleared 201d ) derivatives , the firm is generally exposed to the credit risk of the relevant ccp . where possible , the firm seeks to mitigate its credit risk exposures arising from derivative transactions through the use of legally enforceable master netting arrangements and collateral agreements . for further discussion of derivative contracts , counterparties and settlement types , see note 6 . the following table summarizes the net derivative receivables for the periods presented . derivative receivables .
|december 31 ( in millions )|2014|2013|
|interest rate|$ 33725|$ 25782|
|credit derivatives|1838|1516|
|foreign exchange|21253|16790|
|equity|8177|12227|
|commodity|13982|9444|
|total net of cash collateral|78975|65759|
|liquid securities and other cash collateral held against derivative receivables|-19604 ( 19604 )|-14435 ( 14435 )|
|total net of all collateral|$ 59371|$ 51324|
derivative receivables reported on the consolidated balance sheets were $ 79.0 billion and $ 65.8 billion at december 31 , 2014 and 2013 , respectively . these amounts represent the fair value of the derivative contracts , after giving effect to legally enforceable master netting agreements and cash collateral held by the firm . however , in management 2019s view , the appropriate measure of current credit risk should also take into consideration additional liquid securities ( primarily u.s . government and agency securities and other g7 government bonds ) and other cash collateral held by the firm aggregating $ 19.6 billion and $ 14.4 billion at december 31 , 2014 and 2013 , respectively , that may be used as security when the fair value of the client 2019s exposure is in the firm 2019s favor . in addition to the collateral described in the preceding paragraph , the firm also holds additional collateral ( primarily : cash ; g7 government securities ; other liquid government-agency and guaranteed securities ; and corporate debt and equity securities ) delivered by clients at the initiation of transactions , as well as collateral related to contracts that have a non-daily call frequency and collateral that the firm has agreed to return but has not yet settled as of the reporting date . although this collateral does not reduce the balances and is not included in the table above , it is available as security against potential exposure that could arise should the fair value of the client 2019s derivative transactions move in the firm 2019s favor . as of december 31 , 2014 and 2013 , the firm held $ 48.6 billion and $ 50.8 billion , respectively , of this additional collateral . the prior period amount has been revised to conform with the current period presentation . the derivative receivables fair value , net of all collateral , also does not include other credit enhancements , such as letters of credit . for additional information on the firm 2019s use of collateral agreements , see note 6. .
Question: what was the ratio of the derivative receivables reported on the consolidated balance sheets for 2014 to 2013 |
Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: course of business , we actively manage our exposure to these market risks by entering into various hedging transactions , authorized under established policies that place clear controls on these activities . the counterparties in these transactions are generally highly rated institutions . we establish credit limits for each counterparty . our hedging transactions include but are not limited to a variety of derivative financial instruments . for information on interest rate , foreign exchange , commodity price , and equity instrument risk , please see note 7 to the consolidated financial statements in item 8 of this report . value at risk the estimates in the table below are intended to measure the maximum potential fair value we could lose in one day from adverse changes in market interest rates , foreign exchange rates , commodity prices , and equity prices under normal market conditions . a monte carlo value-at-risk ( var ) methodology was used to quantify the market risk for our exposures . the models assumed normal market conditions and used a 95 percent confidence level . the var calculation used historical interest and foreign exchange rates , and commodity and equity prices from the past year to estimate the potential volatility and correlation of these rates in the future . the market data were drawn from the riskmetrics 2122 data set . the calculations are not intended to represent actual losses in fair value that we expect to incur . further , since the hedging instrument ( the derivative ) inversely correlates with the underlying exposure , we would expect that any loss or gain in the fair value of our derivatives would be generally offset by an increase or decrease in the fair value of the underlying exposure . the positions included in the calculations were : debt ; investments ; interest rate swaps ; foreign exchange forwards ; commodity swaps , futures , and options ; and equity instruments . the calculations do not include the underlying foreign exchange and commodities or equity-related positions that are offset by these market-risk-sensitive instruments . the table below presents the estimated maximum potential var arising from a one-day loss in fair value for our interest rate , foreign currency , commodity , and equity market-risk-sensitive instruments outstanding as of may 27 , 2018 and may 28 , 2017 , and the average fair value impact during the year ended may 27 , 2018. .
|in millions|fair value impact may 27 2018|fair value impact averageduringfiscal 2018|fair value impact may 282017|
|interest rate instruments|$ 33.2|$ 27.5|$ 25.1|
|foreign currency instruments|21.3|23.1|24.6|
|commodity instruments|1.9|2.1|3.2|
|equity instruments|2.0|1.4|1.3|
.
Question: what is the net change in interest rate instruments from 2017 to 2018? | 8.1 | ### Transformed FinQA Question Generation Instructions
#### Step 1: Analyze and Understand the Original FinQA Question
- Objective: Use the given FinQA question to generate a new, logically similar but numerically different question.
- Guidelines:
- Identify the financial concepts and quantitative reasoning in the original question.
- Determine the key variables (e.g., revenue, profit, growth rate, interest) and their relationships.
- Maintain the original question’s structure and complexity.
#### Step 2: Transform and Adapt
- Objective: Create a new FinQA-style question while modifying numerical values and conditions.
- Guidelines:
- Change financial figures, constraints, or business conditions to create a unique question.
- Ensure the transformation maintains financial realism (e.g., realistic market trends, interest rates).
- Retain the original reasoning and computational steps while introducing fresh data points.
#### Step 3: Generate the New FinQA Question
- Objective: Output an original, transformed FinQA question without providing an answer or solution.
- Guidelines:
- Ensure the new question aligns with FinQA’s format and complexity.
- Maintain clarity and well-defined financial relationships.
### Response Rule
- **Generate only the "Transformed FinQA Question" for the given example without including any answer, explanation, or solution.**
### Output Format
#### Transformed FinQA Question: [Write your transformed FinQA question here.]
----
#### Task
#### Original FinQA Question: Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: course of business , we actively manage our exposure to these market risks by entering into various hedging transactions , authorized under established policies that place clear controls on these activities . the counterparties in these transactions are generally highly rated institutions . we establish credit limits for each counterparty . our hedging transactions include but are not limited to a variety of derivative financial instruments . for information on interest rate , foreign exchange , commodity price , and equity instrument risk , please see note 7 to the consolidated financial statements in item 8 of this report . value at risk the estimates in the table below are intended to measure the maximum potential fair value we could lose in one day from adverse changes in market interest rates , foreign exchange rates , commodity prices , and equity prices under normal market conditions . a monte carlo value-at-risk ( var ) methodology was used to quantify the market risk for our exposures . the models assumed normal market conditions and used a 95 percent confidence level . the var calculation used historical interest and foreign exchange rates , and commodity and equity prices from the past year to estimate the potential volatility and correlation of these rates in the future . the market data were drawn from the riskmetrics 2122 data set . the calculations are not intended to represent actual losses in fair value that we expect to incur . further , since the hedging instrument ( the derivative ) inversely correlates with the underlying exposure , we would expect that any loss or gain in the fair value of our derivatives would be generally offset by an increase or decrease in the fair value of the underlying exposure . the positions included in the calculations were : debt ; investments ; interest rate swaps ; foreign exchange forwards ; commodity swaps , futures , and options ; and equity instruments . the calculations do not include the underlying foreign exchange and commodities or equity-related positions that are offset by these market-risk-sensitive instruments . the table below presents the estimated maximum potential var arising from a one-day loss in fair value for our interest rate , foreign currency , commodity , and equity market-risk-sensitive instruments outstanding as of may 27 , 2018 and may 28 , 2017 , and the average fair value impact during the year ended may 27 , 2018. .
|in millions|fair value impact may 27 2018|fair value impact averageduringfiscal 2018|fair value impact may 282017|
|interest rate instruments|$ 33.2|$ 27.5|$ 25.1|
|foreign currency instruments|21.3|23.1|24.6|
|commodity instruments|1.9|2.1|3.2|
|equity instruments|2.0|1.4|1.3|
.
Question: what is the net change in interest rate instruments from 2017 to 2018? |
Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: for the valuation of the 4199466 performance-based options granted in 2005 : the risk free interest rate was 4.2% ( 4.2 % ) , the volatility factor for the expected market price of the common stock was 44% ( 44 % ) , the expected dividend yield was zero and the objective time to exercise was 4.7 years with an objective in the money assumption of 2.95 years . it was also expected that the initial public offering assumption would occur within a 9 month period from grant date . the fair value of the performance-based options was calculated to be $ 5.85 . the fair value for fis options granted in 2006 was estimated at the date of grant using a black-scholes option- pricing model with the following weighted average assumptions . the risk free interest rates used in the calculation are the rate that corresponds to the weighted average expected life of an option . the risk free interest rate used for options granted during 2006 was 4.9% ( 4.9 % ) . a volatility factor for the expected market price of the common stock of 30% ( 30 % ) was used for options granted in 2006 . the expected dividend yield used for 2006 was 0.5% ( 0.5 % ) . a weighted average expected life of 6.4 years was used for 2006 . the weighted average fair value of each option granted during 2006 was $ 15.52 . at december 31 , 2006 , the total unrecognized compensation cost related to non-vested stock option grants is $ 86.1 million , which is expected to be recognized in pre-tax income over a weighted average period of 1.9 years . the company intends to limit dilution caused by option exercises , including anticipated exercises , by repurchasing shares on the open market or in privately negotiated transactions . during 2006 , the company repurchased 4261200 shares at an average price of $ 37.60 . on october 25 , 2006 , the company 2019s board of directors approved a plan authorizing the repurchase of up to an additional $ 200 million worth of the company 2019s common stock . defined benefit plans certegy pension plan in connection with the certegy merger , the company announced that it will terminate and settle the certegy u.s . retirement income plan ( usrip ) . the estimated impact of this settlement was reflected in the purchase price allocation as an increase in the pension liability , less the fair value of the pension plan assets , based on estimates of the total cost to settle the liability through the purchase of annuity contracts or lump sum settlements to the beneficiaries . the final settlement will not occur until after an irs determination has been obtained , which is expected to be received in 2007 . in addition to the net pension plan obligation of $ 21.6 million , the company assumed liabilities of $ 8.0 million for certegy 2019s supplemental executive retirement plan ( 201cserp 201d ) and $ 3.0 mil- lion for a postretirement benefit plan . a reconciliation of the changes in the fair value of plan assets of the usrip for the period from february 1 , 2006 through december 31 , 2006 is as follows ( in thousands ) : .
||2006|
|fair value of plan assets at acquisition date|$ 57369|
|actual return on plan assets|8200|
|benefits paid|-797 ( 797 )|
|fair value of plan assets at end of year|$ 64772|
benefits paid in the above table include only those amounts paid directly from plan assets . as of december 31 , 2006 and for 2007 through the pay out of the pension liability , the assets are being invested in u.s . treasury bonds due to the short duration until final payment . fidelity national information services , inc . and subsidiaries and affiliates consolidated and combined financial statements notes to consolidated and combined financial statements 2014 ( continued ) .
Question: what is the percent increase in the fair value of plant asset after the acquisition date? | 0.12904 | ### Transformed FinQA Question Generation Instructions
#### Step 1: Analyze and Understand the Original FinQA Question
- Objective: Use the given FinQA question to generate a new, logically similar but numerically different question.
- Guidelines:
- Identify the financial concepts and quantitative reasoning in the original question.
- Determine the key variables (e.g., revenue, profit, growth rate, interest) and their relationships.
- Maintain the original question’s structure and complexity.
#### Step 2: Transform and Adapt
- Objective: Create a new FinQA-style question while modifying numerical values and conditions.
- Guidelines:
- Change financial figures, constraints, or business conditions to create a unique question.
- Ensure the transformation maintains financial realism (e.g., realistic market trends, interest rates).
- Retain the original reasoning and computational steps while introducing fresh data points.
#### Step 3: Generate the New FinQA Question
- Objective: Output an original, transformed FinQA question without providing an answer or solution.
- Guidelines:
- Ensure the new question aligns with FinQA’s format and complexity.
- Maintain clarity and well-defined financial relationships.
### Response Rule
- **Generate only the "Transformed FinQA Question" for the given example without including any answer, explanation, or solution.**
### Output Format
#### Transformed FinQA Question: [Write your transformed FinQA question here.]
----
#### Task
#### Original FinQA Question: Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: for the valuation of the 4199466 performance-based options granted in 2005 : the risk free interest rate was 4.2% ( 4.2 % ) , the volatility factor for the expected market price of the common stock was 44% ( 44 % ) , the expected dividend yield was zero and the objective time to exercise was 4.7 years with an objective in the money assumption of 2.95 years . it was also expected that the initial public offering assumption would occur within a 9 month period from grant date . the fair value of the performance-based options was calculated to be $ 5.85 . the fair value for fis options granted in 2006 was estimated at the date of grant using a black-scholes option- pricing model with the following weighted average assumptions . the risk free interest rates used in the calculation are the rate that corresponds to the weighted average expected life of an option . the risk free interest rate used for options granted during 2006 was 4.9% ( 4.9 % ) . a volatility factor for the expected market price of the common stock of 30% ( 30 % ) was used for options granted in 2006 . the expected dividend yield used for 2006 was 0.5% ( 0.5 % ) . a weighted average expected life of 6.4 years was used for 2006 . the weighted average fair value of each option granted during 2006 was $ 15.52 . at december 31 , 2006 , the total unrecognized compensation cost related to non-vested stock option grants is $ 86.1 million , which is expected to be recognized in pre-tax income over a weighted average period of 1.9 years . the company intends to limit dilution caused by option exercises , including anticipated exercises , by repurchasing shares on the open market or in privately negotiated transactions . during 2006 , the company repurchased 4261200 shares at an average price of $ 37.60 . on october 25 , 2006 , the company 2019s board of directors approved a plan authorizing the repurchase of up to an additional $ 200 million worth of the company 2019s common stock . defined benefit plans certegy pension plan in connection with the certegy merger , the company announced that it will terminate and settle the certegy u.s . retirement income plan ( usrip ) . the estimated impact of this settlement was reflected in the purchase price allocation as an increase in the pension liability , less the fair value of the pension plan assets , based on estimates of the total cost to settle the liability through the purchase of annuity contracts or lump sum settlements to the beneficiaries . the final settlement will not occur until after an irs determination has been obtained , which is expected to be received in 2007 . in addition to the net pension plan obligation of $ 21.6 million , the company assumed liabilities of $ 8.0 million for certegy 2019s supplemental executive retirement plan ( 201cserp 201d ) and $ 3.0 mil- lion for a postretirement benefit plan . a reconciliation of the changes in the fair value of plan assets of the usrip for the period from february 1 , 2006 through december 31 , 2006 is as follows ( in thousands ) : .
||2006|
|fair value of plan assets at acquisition date|$ 57369|
|actual return on plan assets|8200|
|benefits paid|-797 ( 797 )|
|fair value of plan assets at end of year|$ 64772|
benefits paid in the above table include only those amounts paid directly from plan assets . as of december 31 , 2006 and for 2007 through the pay out of the pension liability , the assets are being invested in u.s . treasury bonds due to the short duration until final payment . fidelity national information services , inc . and subsidiaries and affiliates consolidated and combined financial statements notes to consolidated and combined financial statements 2014 ( continued ) .
Question: what is the percent increase in the fair value of plant asset after the acquisition date? |
Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: state street corporation notes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) with respect to the 5.25% ( 5.25 % ) subordinated bank notes due 2018 , state street bank is required to make semi- annual interest payments on the outstanding principal balance of the notes on april 15 and october 15 of each year , and the notes qualify for inclusion in tier 2 regulatory capital under current federal regulatory capital guidelines . with respect to the 5.30% ( 5.30 % ) subordinated notes due 2016 and the floating-rate subordinated notes due 2015 , state street bank is required to make semi-annual interest payments on the outstanding principal balance of the 5.30% ( 5.30 % ) subordinated notes on january 15 and july 15 of each year , and quarterly interest payments on the outstanding principal balance of the floating-rate notes on march 8 , june 8 , september 8 and december 8 of each year . each of the subordinated notes qualifies for inclusion in tier 2 regulatory capital under current federal regulatory capital guidelines . note 11 . commitments , guarantees and contingencies commitments : we had unfunded off-balance sheet commitments to extend credit totaling $ 21.30 billion and $ 17.86 billion as of december 31 , 2013 and 2012 , respectively . the potential losses associated with these commitments equal the gross contractual amounts , and do not consider the value of any collateral . approximately 75% ( 75 % ) of our unfunded commitments to extend credit expire within one year from the date of issue . since many of these commitments are expected to expire or renew without being drawn upon , the gross contractual amounts do not necessarily represent our future cash requirements . guarantees : off-balance sheet guarantees are composed of indemnified securities financing , stable value protection , unfunded commitments to purchase assets , and standby letters of credit . the potential losses associated with these guarantees equal the gross contractual amounts , and do not consider the value of any collateral . the following table presents the aggregate gross contractual amounts of our off-balance sheet guarantees as of december 31 , 2013 and 2012 . amounts presented do not reflect participations to independent third parties. .
|( in millions )|2013|2012|
|indemnified securities financing|$ 320078|$ 302341|
|stable value protection|24906|33512|
|asset purchase agreements|4685|5063|
|standby letters of credit|4612|4552|
indemnified securities financing on behalf of our clients , we lend their securities , as agent , to brokers and other institutions . in most circumstances , we indemnify our clients for the fair market value of those securities against a failure of the borrower to return such securities . we require the borrowers to maintain collateral in an amount equal to or in excess of 100% ( 100 % ) of the fair market value of the securities borrowed . securities on loan and the collateral are revalued daily to determine if additional collateral is necessary or if excess collateral is required to be returned to the borrower . collateral received in connection with our securities lending services is held by us as agent and is not recorded in our consolidated statement of condition . the cash collateral held by us as agent is invested on behalf of our clients . in certain cases , the cash collateral is invested in third-party repurchase agreements , for which we indemnify the client against loss of the principal invested . we require the counterparty to the indemnified repurchase agreement to provide collateral in an amount equal to or in excess of 100% ( 100 % ) of the amount of the repurchase agreement . in our role as agent , the indemnified repurchase agreements and the related collateral held by us are not recorded in our consolidated statement of condition. .
Question: what is the percentage change in the balance related to stable value protection from 2012 to 2013? | -0.2568 | ### Transformed FinQA Question Generation Instructions
#### Step 1: Analyze and Understand the Original FinQA Question
- Objective: Use the given FinQA question to generate a new, logically similar but numerically different question.
- Guidelines:
- Identify the financial concepts and quantitative reasoning in the original question.
- Determine the key variables (e.g., revenue, profit, growth rate, interest) and their relationships.
- Maintain the original question’s structure and complexity.
#### Step 2: Transform and Adapt
- Objective: Create a new FinQA-style question while modifying numerical values and conditions.
- Guidelines:
- Change financial figures, constraints, or business conditions to create a unique question.
- Ensure the transformation maintains financial realism (e.g., realistic market trends, interest rates).
- Retain the original reasoning and computational steps while introducing fresh data points.
#### Step 3: Generate the New FinQA Question
- Objective: Output an original, transformed FinQA question without providing an answer or solution.
- Guidelines:
- Ensure the new question aligns with FinQA’s format and complexity.
- Maintain clarity and well-defined financial relationships.
### Response Rule
- **Generate only the "Transformed FinQA Question" for the given example without including any answer, explanation, or solution.**
### Output Format
#### Transformed FinQA Question: [Write your transformed FinQA question here.]
----
#### Task
#### Original FinQA Question: Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: state street corporation notes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) with respect to the 5.25% ( 5.25 % ) subordinated bank notes due 2018 , state street bank is required to make semi- annual interest payments on the outstanding principal balance of the notes on april 15 and october 15 of each year , and the notes qualify for inclusion in tier 2 regulatory capital under current federal regulatory capital guidelines . with respect to the 5.30% ( 5.30 % ) subordinated notes due 2016 and the floating-rate subordinated notes due 2015 , state street bank is required to make semi-annual interest payments on the outstanding principal balance of the 5.30% ( 5.30 % ) subordinated notes on january 15 and july 15 of each year , and quarterly interest payments on the outstanding principal balance of the floating-rate notes on march 8 , june 8 , september 8 and december 8 of each year . each of the subordinated notes qualifies for inclusion in tier 2 regulatory capital under current federal regulatory capital guidelines . note 11 . commitments , guarantees and contingencies commitments : we had unfunded off-balance sheet commitments to extend credit totaling $ 21.30 billion and $ 17.86 billion as of december 31 , 2013 and 2012 , respectively . the potential losses associated with these commitments equal the gross contractual amounts , and do not consider the value of any collateral . approximately 75% ( 75 % ) of our unfunded commitments to extend credit expire within one year from the date of issue . since many of these commitments are expected to expire or renew without being drawn upon , the gross contractual amounts do not necessarily represent our future cash requirements . guarantees : off-balance sheet guarantees are composed of indemnified securities financing , stable value protection , unfunded commitments to purchase assets , and standby letters of credit . the potential losses associated with these guarantees equal the gross contractual amounts , and do not consider the value of any collateral . the following table presents the aggregate gross contractual amounts of our off-balance sheet guarantees as of december 31 , 2013 and 2012 . amounts presented do not reflect participations to independent third parties. .
|( in millions )|2013|2012|
|indemnified securities financing|$ 320078|$ 302341|
|stable value protection|24906|33512|
|asset purchase agreements|4685|5063|
|standby letters of credit|4612|4552|
indemnified securities financing on behalf of our clients , we lend their securities , as agent , to brokers and other institutions . in most circumstances , we indemnify our clients for the fair market value of those securities against a failure of the borrower to return such securities . we require the borrowers to maintain collateral in an amount equal to or in excess of 100% ( 100 % ) of the fair market value of the securities borrowed . securities on loan and the collateral are revalued daily to determine if additional collateral is necessary or if excess collateral is required to be returned to the borrower . collateral received in connection with our securities lending services is held by us as agent and is not recorded in our consolidated statement of condition . the cash collateral held by us as agent is invested on behalf of our clients . in certain cases , the cash collateral is invested in third-party repurchase agreements , for which we indemnify the client against loss of the principal invested . we require the counterparty to the indemnified repurchase agreement to provide collateral in an amount equal to or in excess of 100% ( 100 % ) of the amount of the repurchase agreement . in our role as agent , the indemnified repurchase agreements and the related collateral held by us are not recorded in our consolidated statement of condition. .
Question: what is the percentage change in the balance related to stable value protection from 2012 to 2013? |
Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: issuer purchases of equity securities the following table provides information about our repurchases of common stock during the three-month period ended december 31 , 2007 . period total number of shares purchased average price paid per total number of shares purchased as part of publicly announced program ( a ) maximum number of shares that may yet be purchased under the program ( b ) .
|period|total number ofshares purchased|average pricepaid pershare|total number of sharespurchased as part ofpubliclyannouncedprogram ( a )|maximum number ofshares that may yet bepurchased under theprogram ( b )|
|october|127100|$ 108.58|127100|35573131|
|november|1504300|109.07|1504300|34068831|
|december|1325900|108.78|1325900|32742931|
( a ) we repurchased a total of 2957300 shares of our common stock during the quarter ended december 31 , 2007 under a share repurchase program that we announced in october 2002 . ( b ) our board of directors has approved a share repurchase program for the repurchase of up to 128 million shares of our common stock from time-to-time , including 20 million shares approved for repurchase by our board of directors in september 2007 . under the program , management has discretion to determine the number and price of the shares to be repurchased , and the timing of any repurchases , in compliance with applicable law and regulation . as of december 31 , 2007 , we had repurchased a total of 95.3 million shares under the program . in 2007 , we did not make any unregistered sales of equity securities. .
Question: how many shares in millions are available to be repurchased under the approved share repurchase program? | 32.7 | ### Transformed FinQA Question Generation Instructions
#### Step 1: Analyze and Understand the Original FinQA Question
- Objective: Use the given FinQA question to generate a new, logically similar but numerically different question.
- Guidelines:
- Identify the financial concepts and quantitative reasoning in the original question.
- Determine the key variables (e.g., revenue, profit, growth rate, interest) and their relationships.
- Maintain the original question’s structure and complexity.
#### Step 2: Transform and Adapt
- Objective: Create a new FinQA-style question while modifying numerical values and conditions.
- Guidelines:
- Change financial figures, constraints, or business conditions to create a unique question.
- Ensure the transformation maintains financial realism (e.g., realistic market trends, interest rates).
- Retain the original reasoning and computational steps while introducing fresh data points.
#### Step 3: Generate the New FinQA Question
- Objective: Output an original, transformed FinQA question without providing an answer or solution.
- Guidelines:
- Ensure the new question aligns with FinQA’s format and complexity.
- Maintain clarity and well-defined financial relationships.
### Response Rule
- **Generate only the "Transformed FinQA Question" for the given example without including any answer, explanation, or solution.**
### Output Format
#### Transformed FinQA Question: [Write your transformed FinQA question here.]
----
#### Task
#### Original FinQA Question: Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: issuer purchases of equity securities the following table provides information about our repurchases of common stock during the three-month period ended december 31 , 2007 . period total number of shares purchased average price paid per total number of shares purchased as part of publicly announced program ( a ) maximum number of shares that may yet be purchased under the program ( b ) .
|period|total number ofshares purchased|average pricepaid pershare|total number of sharespurchased as part ofpubliclyannouncedprogram ( a )|maximum number ofshares that may yet bepurchased under theprogram ( b )|
|october|127100|$ 108.58|127100|35573131|
|november|1504300|109.07|1504300|34068831|
|december|1325900|108.78|1325900|32742931|
( a ) we repurchased a total of 2957300 shares of our common stock during the quarter ended december 31 , 2007 under a share repurchase program that we announced in october 2002 . ( b ) our board of directors has approved a share repurchase program for the repurchase of up to 128 million shares of our common stock from time-to-time , including 20 million shares approved for repurchase by our board of directors in september 2007 . under the program , management has discretion to determine the number and price of the shares to be repurchased , and the timing of any repurchases , in compliance with applicable law and regulation . as of december 31 , 2007 , we had repurchased a total of 95.3 million shares under the program . in 2007 , we did not make any unregistered sales of equity securities. .
Question: how many shares in millions are available to be repurchased under the approved share repurchase program? |
Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: unit shipments increased 49% ( 49 % ) to 217.4 million units in 2006 , compared to 146.0 million units in 2005 . the overall increase was driven by increased unit shipments of products for gsm , cdma and 3g technologies , partially offset by decreased unit shipments of products for iden technology . for the full year 2006 , unit shipments by the segment increased in all regions . due to the segment 2019s increase in unit shipments outpacing overall growth in the worldwide handset market , which grew approximately 20% ( 20 % ) in 2006 , the segment believes that it expanded its global handset market share to an estimated 22% ( 22 % ) for the full year 2006 . in 2006 , asp decreased approximately 11% ( 11 % ) compared to 2005 . the overall decrease in asp was driven primarily by changes in the geographic and product-tier mix of sales . by comparison , asp decreased approximately 10% ( 10 % ) in 2005 and increased approximately 15% ( 15 % ) in 2004 . asp is impacted by numerous factors , including product mix , market conditions and competitive product offerings , and asp trends often vary over time . in 2006 , the largest of the segment 2019s end customers ( including sales through distributors ) were china mobile , verizon , sprint nextel , cingular , and t-mobile . these five largest customers accounted for approximately 39% ( 39 % ) of the segment 2019s net sales in 2006 . besides selling directly to carriers and operators , the segment also sold products through a variety of third-party distributors and retailers , which accounted for approximately 38% ( 38 % ) of the segment 2019s net sales . the largest of these distributors was brightstar corporation . although the u.s . market continued to be the segment 2019s largest individual market , many of our customers , and more than 65% ( 65 % ) of the segment 2019s 2006 net sales , were outside the u.s . the largest of these international markets were china , brazil , the united kingdom and mexico . home and networks mobility segment the home and networks mobility segment designs , manufactures , sells , installs and services : ( i ) digital video , internet protocol ( 201cip 201d ) video and broadcast network interactive set-tops ( 201cdigital entertainment devices 201d ) , end-to- end video delivery solutions , broadband access infrastructure systems , and associated data and voice customer premise equipment ( 201cbroadband gateways 201d ) to cable television and telecom service providers ( collectively , referred to as the 201chome business 201d ) , and ( ii ) wireless access systems ( 201cwireless networks 201d ) , including cellular infrastructure systems and wireless broadband systems , to wireless service providers . in 2007 , the segment 2019s net sales represented 27% ( 27 % ) of the company 2019s consolidated net sales , compared to 21% ( 21 % ) in 2006 and 26% ( 26 % ) in 2005 . ( dollars in millions ) 2007 2006 2005 2007 20142006 2006 20142005 years ended december 31 percent change .
|( dollars in millions )|years ended december 31 2007|years ended december 31 2006|years ended december 31 2005|years ended december 31 2007 20142006|2006 20142005|
|segment net sales|$ 10014|$ 9164|$ 9037|9% ( 9 % )|1% ( 1 % )|
|operating earnings|709|787|1232|( 10 ) % ( % )|( 36 ) % ( % )|
segment results 20142007 compared to 2006 in 2007 , the segment 2019s net sales increased 9% ( 9 % ) to $ 10.0 billion , compared to $ 9.2 billion in 2006 . the 9% ( 9 % ) increase in net sales reflects a 27% ( 27 % ) increase in net sales in the home business , partially offset by a 1% ( 1 % ) decrease in net sales of wireless networks . net sales of digital entertainment devices increased approximately 43% ( 43 % ) , reflecting increased demand for digital set-tops , including hd/dvr set-tops and ip set-tops , partially offset by a decline in asp due to a product mix shift towards all-digital set-tops . unit shipments of digital entertainment devices increased 51% ( 51 % ) to 15.2 million units . net sales of broadband gateways increased approximately 6% ( 6 % ) , primarily due to higher net sales of data modems , driven by net sales from the netopia business acquired in february 2007 . net sales of wireless networks decreased 1% ( 1 % ) , primarily driven by lower net sales of iden and cdma infrastructure equipment , partially offset by higher net sales of gsm infrastructure equipment , despite competitive pricing pressure . on a geographic basis , the 9% ( 9 % ) increase in net sales reflects higher net sales in all geographic regions . the increase in net sales in north america was driven primarily by higher sales of digital entertainment devices , partially offset by lower net sales of iden and cdma infrastructure equipment . the increase in net sales in asia was primarily due to higher net sales of gsm infrastructure equipment , partially offset by lower net sales of cdma infrastructure equipment . the increase in net sales in emea was , primarily due to higher net sales of gsm infrastructure equipment , partially offset by lower demand for iden and cdma infrastructure equipment . net sales in north america continue to comprise a significant portion of the segment 2019s business , accounting for 52% ( 52 % ) of the segment 2019s total net sales in 2007 , compared to 56% ( 56 % ) of the segment 2019s total net sales in 2006 . 60 management 2019s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations .
Question: what was the growth , in a percentage , of the consolidated net sales from 2005 to 2007? | 0.15073 | ### Transformed FinQA Question Generation Instructions
#### Step 1: Analyze and Understand the Original FinQA Question
- Objective: Use the given FinQA question to generate a new, logically similar but numerically different question.
- Guidelines:
- Identify the financial concepts and quantitative reasoning in the original question.
- Determine the key variables (e.g., revenue, profit, growth rate, interest) and their relationships.
- Maintain the original question’s structure and complexity.
#### Step 2: Transform and Adapt
- Objective: Create a new FinQA-style question while modifying numerical values and conditions.
- Guidelines:
- Change financial figures, constraints, or business conditions to create a unique question.
- Ensure the transformation maintains financial realism (e.g., realistic market trends, interest rates).
- Retain the original reasoning and computational steps while introducing fresh data points.
#### Step 3: Generate the New FinQA Question
- Objective: Output an original, transformed FinQA question without providing an answer or solution.
- Guidelines:
- Ensure the new question aligns with FinQA’s format and complexity.
- Maintain clarity and well-defined financial relationships.
### Response Rule
- **Generate only the "Transformed FinQA Question" for the given example without including any answer, explanation, or solution.**
### Output Format
#### Transformed FinQA Question: [Write your transformed FinQA question here.]
----
#### Task
#### Original FinQA Question: Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: unit shipments increased 49% ( 49 % ) to 217.4 million units in 2006 , compared to 146.0 million units in 2005 . the overall increase was driven by increased unit shipments of products for gsm , cdma and 3g technologies , partially offset by decreased unit shipments of products for iden technology . for the full year 2006 , unit shipments by the segment increased in all regions . due to the segment 2019s increase in unit shipments outpacing overall growth in the worldwide handset market , which grew approximately 20% ( 20 % ) in 2006 , the segment believes that it expanded its global handset market share to an estimated 22% ( 22 % ) for the full year 2006 . in 2006 , asp decreased approximately 11% ( 11 % ) compared to 2005 . the overall decrease in asp was driven primarily by changes in the geographic and product-tier mix of sales . by comparison , asp decreased approximately 10% ( 10 % ) in 2005 and increased approximately 15% ( 15 % ) in 2004 . asp is impacted by numerous factors , including product mix , market conditions and competitive product offerings , and asp trends often vary over time . in 2006 , the largest of the segment 2019s end customers ( including sales through distributors ) were china mobile , verizon , sprint nextel , cingular , and t-mobile . these five largest customers accounted for approximately 39% ( 39 % ) of the segment 2019s net sales in 2006 . besides selling directly to carriers and operators , the segment also sold products through a variety of third-party distributors and retailers , which accounted for approximately 38% ( 38 % ) of the segment 2019s net sales . the largest of these distributors was brightstar corporation . although the u.s . market continued to be the segment 2019s largest individual market , many of our customers , and more than 65% ( 65 % ) of the segment 2019s 2006 net sales , were outside the u.s . the largest of these international markets were china , brazil , the united kingdom and mexico . home and networks mobility segment the home and networks mobility segment designs , manufactures , sells , installs and services : ( i ) digital video , internet protocol ( 201cip 201d ) video and broadcast network interactive set-tops ( 201cdigital entertainment devices 201d ) , end-to- end video delivery solutions , broadband access infrastructure systems , and associated data and voice customer premise equipment ( 201cbroadband gateways 201d ) to cable television and telecom service providers ( collectively , referred to as the 201chome business 201d ) , and ( ii ) wireless access systems ( 201cwireless networks 201d ) , including cellular infrastructure systems and wireless broadband systems , to wireless service providers . in 2007 , the segment 2019s net sales represented 27% ( 27 % ) of the company 2019s consolidated net sales , compared to 21% ( 21 % ) in 2006 and 26% ( 26 % ) in 2005 . ( dollars in millions ) 2007 2006 2005 2007 20142006 2006 20142005 years ended december 31 percent change .
|( dollars in millions )|years ended december 31 2007|years ended december 31 2006|years ended december 31 2005|years ended december 31 2007 20142006|2006 20142005|
|segment net sales|$ 10014|$ 9164|$ 9037|9% ( 9 % )|1% ( 1 % )|
|operating earnings|709|787|1232|( 10 ) % ( % )|( 36 ) % ( % )|
segment results 20142007 compared to 2006 in 2007 , the segment 2019s net sales increased 9% ( 9 % ) to $ 10.0 billion , compared to $ 9.2 billion in 2006 . the 9% ( 9 % ) increase in net sales reflects a 27% ( 27 % ) increase in net sales in the home business , partially offset by a 1% ( 1 % ) decrease in net sales of wireless networks . net sales of digital entertainment devices increased approximately 43% ( 43 % ) , reflecting increased demand for digital set-tops , including hd/dvr set-tops and ip set-tops , partially offset by a decline in asp due to a product mix shift towards all-digital set-tops . unit shipments of digital entertainment devices increased 51% ( 51 % ) to 15.2 million units . net sales of broadband gateways increased approximately 6% ( 6 % ) , primarily due to higher net sales of data modems , driven by net sales from the netopia business acquired in february 2007 . net sales of wireless networks decreased 1% ( 1 % ) , primarily driven by lower net sales of iden and cdma infrastructure equipment , partially offset by higher net sales of gsm infrastructure equipment , despite competitive pricing pressure . on a geographic basis , the 9% ( 9 % ) increase in net sales reflects higher net sales in all geographic regions . the increase in net sales in north america was driven primarily by higher sales of digital entertainment devices , partially offset by lower net sales of iden and cdma infrastructure equipment . the increase in net sales in asia was primarily due to higher net sales of gsm infrastructure equipment , partially offset by lower net sales of cdma infrastructure equipment . the increase in net sales in emea was , primarily due to higher net sales of gsm infrastructure equipment , partially offset by lower demand for iden and cdma infrastructure equipment . net sales in north america continue to comprise a significant portion of the segment 2019s business , accounting for 52% ( 52 % ) of the segment 2019s total net sales in 2007 , compared to 56% ( 56 % ) of the segment 2019s total net sales in 2006 . 60 management 2019s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations .
Question: what was the growth , in a percentage , of the consolidated net sales from 2005 to 2007? |
Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: key operating and financial activities significant operating and financial activities during 2012 include : 2022 net proved reserve additions for the e&p and osm segments combined of 389 mmboe , for a 226 percent reserve replacement 2022 increased proved liquid hydrocarbon and synthetic crude oil reserves by 316 mmbbls , for a reserve replacement of 268 percent for these commodities 2022 recorded more than 95 percent average operational availability for operated e&p assets 2022 increased e&p net sales volumes , excluding libya , by 8 percent 2022 eagle ford shale average net sales volumes of 65 mboed for december 2012 , a fourfold increase over december 2011 2022 bakken shale average net sales volumes of 29 mboed , a 71 percent increase over last year 2022 resumed sales from libya and reached pre-conflict production levels 2022 international liquid hydrocarbon sales volumes , for which average realizations have exceeded wti , were 62 percent of net e&p liquid hydrocarbon sales 2022 closed $ 1 billion of acquisitions in the core of the eagle ford shale 2022 assumed operatorship of the vilje field located offshore norway 2022 signed agreements for new exploration positions in e.g. , gabon , kenya and ethiopia 2022 issued $ 1 billion of 3-year senior notes at 0.9 percent interest and $ 1 billion of 10-year senior notes at 2.8 percent interest some significant 2013 activities through february 22 , 2013 include : 2022 closed sale of our alaska assets in january 2013 2022 closed sale of our interest in the neptune gas plant in february 2013 consolidated results of operations : 2012 compared to 2011 consolidated income before income taxes was 38 percent higher in 2012 than consolidated income from continuing operations before income taxes were in 2011 , largely due to higher liquid hydrocarbon sales volumes in our e&p segment , partially offset by lower earnings from our osm and ig segments . the 7 percent decrease in income from continuing operations included lower earnings in the u.k . and e.g. , partially offset by higher earnings in libya . also , in 2011 we were not in an excess foreign tax credit position for the entire year as we were in 2012 . the effective income tax rate for continuing operations was 74 percent in 2012 compared to 61 percent in 2011 . revenues are summarized in the following table: .
|( in millions )|2012|2011|
|e&p|$ 14084|$ 13029|
|osm|1552|1588|
|ig|2014|93|
|segment revenues|15636|14710|
|elimination of intersegment revenues|2014|-47 ( 47 )|
|unrealized gain on crude oil derivative instruments|52|2014|
|total revenues|$ 15688|$ 14663|
e&p segment revenues increased $ 1055 million from 2011 to 2012 , primarily due to higher average liquid hydrocarbon sales volumes . e&p segment revenues included a net realized gain on crude oil derivative instruments of $ 15 million in 2012 while the impact of derivatives was not significant in 2011 . see item 8 . financial statements and supplementary data 2013 note 16 to the consolidated financial statement for more information about our crude oil derivative instruments . included in our e&p segment are supply optimization activities which include the purchase of commodities from third parties for resale . see the cost of revenues discussion as revenues from supply optimization approximate the related costs . supply optimization serves to aggregate volumes in order to satisfy transportation commitments and to achieve flexibility within product .
Question: what percentage of total revenues consited of e&p production in 2012? | 0.89776 | ### Transformed FinQA Question Generation Instructions
#### Step 1: Analyze and Understand the Original FinQA Question
- Objective: Use the given FinQA question to generate a new, logically similar but numerically different question.
- Guidelines:
- Identify the financial concepts and quantitative reasoning in the original question.
- Determine the key variables (e.g., revenue, profit, growth rate, interest) and their relationships.
- Maintain the original question’s structure and complexity.
#### Step 2: Transform and Adapt
- Objective: Create a new FinQA-style question while modifying numerical values and conditions.
- Guidelines:
- Change financial figures, constraints, or business conditions to create a unique question.
- Ensure the transformation maintains financial realism (e.g., realistic market trends, interest rates).
- Retain the original reasoning and computational steps while introducing fresh data points.
#### Step 3: Generate the New FinQA Question
- Objective: Output an original, transformed FinQA question without providing an answer or solution.
- Guidelines:
- Ensure the new question aligns with FinQA’s format and complexity.
- Maintain clarity and well-defined financial relationships.
### Response Rule
- **Generate only the "Transformed FinQA Question" for the given example without including any answer, explanation, or solution.**
### Output Format
#### Transformed FinQA Question: [Write your transformed FinQA question here.]
----
#### Task
#### Original FinQA Question: Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: key operating and financial activities significant operating and financial activities during 2012 include : 2022 net proved reserve additions for the e&p and osm segments combined of 389 mmboe , for a 226 percent reserve replacement 2022 increased proved liquid hydrocarbon and synthetic crude oil reserves by 316 mmbbls , for a reserve replacement of 268 percent for these commodities 2022 recorded more than 95 percent average operational availability for operated e&p assets 2022 increased e&p net sales volumes , excluding libya , by 8 percent 2022 eagle ford shale average net sales volumes of 65 mboed for december 2012 , a fourfold increase over december 2011 2022 bakken shale average net sales volumes of 29 mboed , a 71 percent increase over last year 2022 resumed sales from libya and reached pre-conflict production levels 2022 international liquid hydrocarbon sales volumes , for which average realizations have exceeded wti , were 62 percent of net e&p liquid hydrocarbon sales 2022 closed $ 1 billion of acquisitions in the core of the eagle ford shale 2022 assumed operatorship of the vilje field located offshore norway 2022 signed agreements for new exploration positions in e.g. , gabon , kenya and ethiopia 2022 issued $ 1 billion of 3-year senior notes at 0.9 percent interest and $ 1 billion of 10-year senior notes at 2.8 percent interest some significant 2013 activities through february 22 , 2013 include : 2022 closed sale of our alaska assets in january 2013 2022 closed sale of our interest in the neptune gas plant in february 2013 consolidated results of operations : 2012 compared to 2011 consolidated income before income taxes was 38 percent higher in 2012 than consolidated income from continuing operations before income taxes were in 2011 , largely due to higher liquid hydrocarbon sales volumes in our e&p segment , partially offset by lower earnings from our osm and ig segments . the 7 percent decrease in income from continuing operations included lower earnings in the u.k . and e.g. , partially offset by higher earnings in libya . also , in 2011 we were not in an excess foreign tax credit position for the entire year as we were in 2012 . the effective income tax rate for continuing operations was 74 percent in 2012 compared to 61 percent in 2011 . revenues are summarized in the following table: .
|( in millions )|2012|2011|
|e&p|$ 14084|$ 13029|
|osm|1552|1588|
|ig|2014|93|
|segment revenues|15636|14710|
|elimination of intersegment revenues|2014|-47 ( 47 )|
|unrealized gain on crude oil derivative instruments|52|2014|
|total revenues|$ 15688|$ 14663|
e&p segment revenues increased $ 1055 million from 2011 to 2012 , primarily due to higher average liquid hydrocarbon sales volumes . e&p segment revenues included a net realized gain on crude oil derivative instruments of $ 15 million in 2012 while the impact of derivatives was not significant in 2011 . see item 8 . financial statements and supplementary data 2013 note 16 to the consolidated financial statement for more information about our crude oil derivative instruments . included in our e&p segment are supply optimization activities which include the purchase of commodities from third parties for resale . see the cost of revenues discussion as revenues from supply optimization approximate the related costs . supply optimization serves to aggregate volumes in order to satisfy transportation commitments and to achieve flexibility within product .
Question: what percentage of total revenues consited of e&p production in 2012? |
Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: westrock company notes to consolidated financial statements fffd ( continued ) at september 30 , 2018 and september 30 , 2017 , gross net operating losses for foreign reporting purposes of approximately $ 698.4 million and $ 673.7 million , respectively , were available for carryforward . a majority of these loss carryforwards generally expire between fiscal 2020 and 2038 , while a portion have an indefinite carryforward . the tax effected values of these net operating losses are $ 185.8 million and $ 182.6 million at september 30 , 2018 and 2017 , respectively , exclusive of valuation allowances of $ 161.5 million and $ 149.6 million at september 30 , 2018 and 2017 , respectively . at september 30 , 2018 and 2017 , we had state tax credit carryforwards of $ 64.8 million and $ 54.4 million , respectively . these state tax credit carryforwards generally expire within 5 to 10 years ; however , certain state credits can be carried forward indefinitely . valuation allowances of $ 56.1 million and $ 47.3 million at september 30 , 2018 and 2017 , respectively , have been provided on these assets . these valuation allowances have been recorded due to uncertainty regarding our ability to generate sufficient taxable income in the appropriate taxing jurisdiction . the following table represents a summary of the valuation allowances against deferred tax assets for fiscal 2018 , 2017 and 2016 ( in millions ) : .
||2018|2017|2016|
|balance at beginning of fiscal year|$ 219.1|$ 177.2|$ 100.2|
|increases|50.8|54.3|24.8|
|allowances related to purchase accounting ( 1 )|0.1|12.4|63.0|
|reductions|-40.6 ( 40.6 )|-24.8 ( 24.8 )|-10.8 ( 10.8 )|
|balance at end of fiscal year|$ 229.4|$ 219.1|$ 177.2|
( 1 ) amounts in fiscal 2018 and 2017 relate to the mps acquisition . adjustments in fiscal 2016 relate to the combination and the sp fiber acquisition . consistent with prior years , we consider a portion of our earnings from certain foreign subsidiaries as subject to repatriation and we provide for taxes accordingly . however , we consider the unremitted earnings and all other outside basis differences from all other foreign subsidiaries to be indefinitely reinvested . accordingly , we have not provided for any taxes that would be due . as of september 30 , 2018 , we estimate our outside basis difference in foreign subsidiaries that are considered indefinitely reinvested to be approximately $ 1.5 billion . the components of the outside basis difference are comprised of purchase accounting adjustments , undistributed earnings , and equity components . except for the portion of our earnings from certain foreign subsidiaries where we provided for taxes , we have not provided for any taxes that would be due upon the reversal of the outside basis differences . however , in the event of a distribution in the form of dividends or dispositions of the subsidiaries , we may be subject to incremental u.s . income taxes , subject to an adjustment for foreign tax credits , and withholding taxes or income taxes payable to the foreign jurisdictions . as of september 30 , 2018 , the determination of the amount of unrecognized deferred tax liability related to any remaining undistributed foreign earnings not subject to the transition tax and additional outside basis differences is not practicable. .
Question: by what percent did the value of reductions increase between 2016 and 2018? | 0.34808 | ### Transformed FinQA Question Generation Instructions
#### Step 1: Analyze and Understand the Original FinQA Question
- Objective: Use the given FinQA question to generate a new, logically similar but numerically different question.
- Guidelines:
- Identify the financial concepts and quantitative reasoning in the original question.
- Determine the key variables (e.g., revenue, profit, growth rate, interest) and their relationships.
- Maintain the original question’s structure and complexity.
#### Step 2: Transform and Adapt
- Objective: Create a new FinQA-style question while modifying numerical values and conditions.
- Guidelines:
- Change financial figures, constraints, or business conditions to create a unique question.
- Ensure the transformation maintains financial realism (e.g., realistic market trends, interest rates).
- Retain the original reasoning and computational steps while introducing fresh data points.
#### Step 3: Generate the New FinQA Question
- Objective: Output an original, transformed FinQA question without providing an answer or solution.
- Guidelines:
- Ensure the new question aligns with FinQA’s format and complexity.
- Maintain clarity and well-defined financial relationships.
### Response Rule
- **Generate only the "Transformed FinQA Question" for the given example without including any answer, explanation, or solution.**
### Output Format
#### Transformed FinQA Question: [Write your transformed FinQA question here.]
----
#### Task
#### Original FinQA Question: Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: westrock company notes to consolidated financial statements fffd ( continued ) at september 30 , 2018 and september 30 , 2017 , gross net operating losses for foreign reporting purposes of approximately $ 698.4 million and $ 673.7 million , respectively , were available for carryforward . a majority of these loss carryforwards generally expire between fiscal 2020 and 2038 , while a portion have an indefinite carryforward . the tax effected values of these net operating losses are $ 185.8 million and $ 182.6 million at september 30 , 2018 and 2017 , respectively , exclusive of valuation allowances of $ 161.5 million and $ 149.6 million at september 30 , 2018 and 2017 , respectively . at september 30 , 2018 and 2017 , we had state tax credit carryforwards of $ 64.8 million and $ 54.4 million , respectively . these state tax credit carryforwards generally expire within 5 to 10 years ; however , certain state credits can be carried forward indefinitely . valuation allowances of $ 56.1 million and $ 47.3 million at september 30 , 2018 and 2017 , respectively , have been provided on these assets . these valuation allowances have been recorded due to uncertainty regarding our ability to generate sufficient taxable income in the appropriate taxing jurisdiction . the following table represents a summary of the valuation allowances against deferred tax assets for fiscal 2018 , 2017 and 2016 ( in millions ) : .
||2018|2017|2016|
|balance at beginning of fiscal year|$ 219.1|$ 177.2|$ 100.2|
|increases|50.8|54.3|24.8|
|allowances related to purchase accounting ( 1 )|0.1|12.4|63.0|
|reductions|-40.6 ( 40.6 )|-24.8 ( 24.8 )|-10.8 ( 10.8 )|
|balance at end of fiscal year|$ 229.4|$ 219.1|$ 177.2|
( 1 ) amounts in fiscal 2018 and 2017 relate to the mps acquisition . adjustments in fiscal 2016 relate to the combination and the sp fiber acquisition . consistent with prior years , we consider a portion of our earnings from certain foreign subsidiaries as subject to repatriation and we provide for taxes accordingly . however , we consider the unremitted earnings and all other outside basis differences from all other foreign subsidiaries to be indefinitely reinvested . accordingly , we have not provided for any taxes that would be due . as of september 30 , 2018 , we estimate our outside basis difference in foreign subsidiaries that are considered indefinitely reinvested to be approximately $ 1.5 billion . the components of the outside basis difference are comprised of purchase accounting adjustments , undistributed earnings , and equity components . except for the portion of our earnings from certain foreign subsidiaries where we provided for taxes , we have not provided for any taxes that would be due upon the reversal of the outside basis differences . however , in the event of a distribution in the form of dividends or dispositions of the subsidiaries , we may be subject to incremental u.s . income taxes , subject to an adjustment for foreign tax credits , and withholding taxes or income taxes payable to the foreign jurisdictions . as of september 30 , 2018 , the determination of the amount of unrecognized deferred tax liability related to any remaining undistributed foreign earnings not subject to the transition tax and additional outside basis differences is not practicable. .
Question: by what percent did the value of reductions increase between 2016 and 2018? |
Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: we realize synergies from consolidating businesses into our existing operations , whether through acquisitions or public-private partnerships , which allow us to reduce capital and expense requirements associated with truck routing , personnel , fleet maintenance , inventories and back-office administration . operating model the goal of our operating model pillar is to deliver a consistent , high quality service to all of our customers through the republic way : one way . everywhere . every day . this approach of developing standardized processes with rigorous controls and tracking allows us to leverage our scale and deliver durable operational excellence . the republic way is the key to harnessing the best of what we do as operators and translating that across all facets of our business . a key enabler of the republic way is our organizational structure that fosters a high performance culture by maintaining 360 degree accountability and full profit and loss responsibility with general management , supported by a functional structure to provide subject matter expertise . this structure allows us to take advantage of our scale by coordinating functionally across all of our markets , while empowering local management to respond to unique market dynamics . we have rolled out several productivity and cost control initiatives designed to deliver the best service possible to our customers in the most efficient and environmentally sound way . fleet automation approximately 72% ( 72 % ) of our residential routes have been converted to automated single driver trucks . by converting our residential routes to automated service , we reduce labor costs , improve driver productivity , decrease emissions and create a safer work environment for our employees . additionally , communities using automated vehicles have higher participation rates in recycling programs , thereby complementing our initiative to expand our recycling capabilities . fleet conversion to compressed natural gas ( cng ) approximately 16% ( 16 % ) of our fleet operates on cng . we expect to continue our gradual fleet conversion to cng , our preferred alternative fuel technology , as part of our ordinary annual fleet replacement process . we believe a gradual fleet conversion is most prudent to realize the full value of our previous fleet investments . approximately 33% ( 33 % ) of our replacement vehicle purchases during 2015 were cng vehicles . we believe using cng vehicles provides us a competitive advantage in communities with strict clean emission initiatives that focus on protecting the environment . although upfront costs are higher , using cng reduces our overall fleet operating costs through lower fuel expenses . as of december 31 , 2015 , we operated 38 cng fueling stations . standardized maintenance based on an industry trade publication , we operate the ninth largest vocational fleet in the united states . as of december 31 , 2015 , our average fleet age in years , by line of business , was as follows : approximate number of vehicles approximate average age .
||approximate number of vehicles|approximate average age|
|residential|7200|7|
|small-container commercial|4400|7|
|large-container industrial|4000|9|
|total|15600|7.5|
onefleet , our standardized vehicle maintenance program , enables us to use best practices for fleet management , truck care and maintenance . through standardization of core functions , we believe we can minimize variability .
Question: as of december 31 , 2015 what was the ratio of vehicles for the residential to the large-container industrial | 1.8 | ### Transformed FinQA Question Generation Instructions
#### Step 1: Analyze and Understand the Original FinQA Question
- Objective: Use the given FinQA question to generate a new, logically similar but numerically different question.
- Guidelines:
- Identify the financial concepts and quantitative reasoning in the original question.
- Determine the key variables (e.g., revenue, profit, growth rate, interest) and their relationships.
- Maintain the original question’s structure and complexity.
#### Step 2: Transform and Adapt
- Objective: Create a new FinQA-style question while modifying numerical values and conditions.
- Guidelines:
- Change financial figures, constraints, or business conditions to create a unique question.
- Ensure the transformation maintains financial realism (e.g., realistic market trends, interest rates).
- Retain the original reasoning and computational steps while introducing fresh data points.
#### Step 3: Generate the New FinQA Question
- Objective: Output an original, transformed FinQA question without providing an answer or solution.
- Guidelines:
- Ensure the new question aligns with FinQA’s format and complexity.
- Maintain clarity and well-defined financial relationships.
### Response Rule
- **Generate only the "Transformed FinQA Question" for the given example without including any answer, explanation, or solution.**
### Output Format
#### Transformed FinQA Question: [Write your transformed FinQA question here.]
----
#### Task
#### Original FinQA Question: Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: we realize synergies from consolidating businesses into our existing operations , whether through acquisitions or public-private partnerships , which allow us to reduce capital and expense requirements associated with truck routing , personnel , fleet maintenance , inventories and back-office administration . operating model the goal of our operating model pillar is to deliver a consistent , high quality service to all of our customers through the republic way : one way . everywhere . every day . this approach of developing standardized processes with rigorous controls and tracking allows us to leverage our scale and deliver durable operational excellence . the republic way is the key to harnessing the best of what we do as operators and translating that across all facets of our business . a key enabler of the republic way is our organizational structure that fosters a high performance culture by maintaining 360 degree accountability and full profit and loss responsibility with general management , supported by a functional structure to provide subject matter expertise . this structure allows us to take advantage of our scale by coordinating functionally across all of our markets , while empowering local management to respond to unique market dynamics . we have rolled out several productivity and cost control initiatives designed to deliver the best service possible to our customers in the most efficient and environmentally sound way . fleet automation approximately 72% ( 72 % ) of our residential routes have been converted to automated single driver trucks . by converting our residential routes to automated service , we reduce labor costs , improve driver productivity , decrease emissions and create a safer work environment for our employees . additionally , communities using automated vehicles have higher participation rates in recycling programs , thereby complementing our initiative to expand our recycling capabilities . fleet conversion to compressed natural gas ( cng ) approximately 16% ( 16 % ) of our fleet operates on cng . we expect to continue our gradual fleet conversion to cng , our preferred alternative fuel technology , as part of our ordinary annual fleet replacement process . we believe a gradual fleet conversion is most prudent to realize the full value of our previous fleet investments . approximately 33% ( 33 % ) of our replacement vehicle purchases during 2015 were cng vehicles . we believe using cng vehicles provides us a competitive advantage in communities with strict clean emission initiatives that focus on protecting the environment . although upfront costs are higher , using cng reduces our overall fleet operating costs through lower fuel expenses . as of december 31 , 2015 , we operated 38 cng fueling stations . standardized maintenance based on an industry trade publication , we operate the ninth largest vocational fleet in the united states . as of december 31 , 2015 , our average fleet age in years , by line of business , was as follows : approximate number of vehicles approximate average age .
||approximate number of vehicles|approximate average age|
|residential|7200|7|
|small-container commercial|4400|7|
|large-container industrial|4000|9|
|total|15600|7.5|
onefleet , our standardized vehicle maintenance program , enables us to use best practices for fleet management , truck care and maintenance . through standardization of core functions , we believe we can minimize variability .
Question: as of december 31 , 2015 what was the ratio of vehicles for the residential to the large-container industrial |
Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: the graph below compares expeditors international of washington , inc.'s cumulative 5-year total shareholder return on common stock with the cumulative total returns of the s&p 500 index and the nasdaq industrial transportation index ( nqusb2770t ) . the graph assumes that the value of the investment in our common stock and in each of the indexes ( including reinvestment of dividends ) was $ 100 on 12/31/2013 and tracks it through 12/31/2018 . total return assumes reinvestment of dividends in each of the indices indicated . comparison of 5-year cumulative total return among expeditors international of washington , inc. , the s&p 500 index and the nasdaq industrial transportation index. .
||12/13|12/14|12/15|12/16|12/17|12/18|
|expeditors international of washington inc .|$ 100.00|$ 100.81|$ 101.92|$ 119.68|$ 146.19|$ 153.88|
|standard and poor's 500 index|100.00|111.39|110.58|121.13|144.65|135.63|
|nasdaq industrial transportation ( nqusb2770t )|100.00|121.41|93.55|120.89|154.19|140.25|
the stock price performance included in this graph is not necessarily indicative of future stock price performance. .
Question: what is the difference in percentage of cumulative total return between expeditors international of washington inc . and the standard and poor's 500 index for the 5 year period ending 12/18? | 53.88 | ### Transformed FinQA Question Generation Instructions
#### Step 1: Analyze and Understand the Original FinQA Question
- Objective: Use the given FinQA question to generate a new, logically similar but numerically different question.
- Guidelines:
- Identify the financial concepts and quantitative reasoning in the original question.
- Determine the key variables (e.g., revenue, profit, growth rate, interest) and their relationships.
- Maintain the original question’s structure and complexity.
#### Step 2: Transform and Adapt
- Objective: Create a new FinQA-style question while modifying numerical values and conditions.
- Guidelines:
- Change financial figures, constraints, or business conditions to create a unique question.
- Ensure the transformation maintains financial realism (e.g., realistic market trends, interest rates).
- Retain the original reasoning and computational steps while introducing fresh data points.
#### Step 3: Generate the New FinQA Question
- Objective: Output an original, transformed FinQA question without providing an answer or solution.
- Guidelines:
- Ensure the new question aligns with FinQA’s format and complexity.
- Maintain clarity and well-defined financial relationships.
### Response Rule
- **Generate only the "Transformed FinQA Question" for the given example without including any answer, explanation, or solution.**
### Output Format
#### Transformed FinQA Question: [Write your transformed FinQA question here.]
----
#### Task
#### Original FinQA Question: Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: the graph below compares expeditors international of washington , inc.'s cumulative 5-year total shareholder return on common stock with the cumulative total returns of the s&p 500 index and the nasdaq industrial transportation index ( nqusb2770t ) . the graph assumes that the value of the investment in our common stock and in each of the indexes ( including reinvestment of dividends ) was $ 100 on 12/31/2013 and tracks it through 12/31/2018 . total return assumes reinvestment of dividends in each of the indices indicated . comparison of 5-year cumulative total return among expeditors international of washington , inc. , the s&p 500 index and the nasdaq industrial transportation index. .
||12/13|12/14|12/15|12/16|12/17|12/18|
|expeditors international of washington inc .|$ 100.00|$ 100.81|$ 101.92|$ 119.68|$ 146.19|$ 153.88|
|standard and poor's 500 index|100.00|111.39|110.58|121.13|144.65|135.63|
|nasdaq industrial transportation ( nqusb2770t )|100.00|121.41|93.55|120.89|154.19|140.25|
the stock price performance included in this graph is not necessarily indicative of future stock price performance. .
Question: what is the difference in percentage of cumulative total return between expeditors international of washington inc . and the standard and poor's 500 index for the 5 year period ending 12/18? |
Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: part i item 1 entergy corporation , utility operating companies , and system energy entergy new orleans provides electric and gas service in the city of new orleans pursuant to indeterminate permits set forth in city ordinances ( except electric service in algiers , which is provided by entergy louisiana ) . these ordinances contain a continuing option for the city of new orleans to purchase entergy new orleans 2019s electric and gas utility properties . entergy texas holds a certificate of convenience and necessity from the puct to provide electric service to areas within approximately 27 counties in eastern texas , and holds non-exclusive franchises to provide electric service in approximately 68 incorporated municipalities . entergy texas was typically granted 50-year franchises , but recently has been receiving 25-year franchises . entergy texas 2019s electric franchises expire during 2013-2058 . the business of system energy is limited to wholesale power sales . it has no distribution franchises . property and other generation resources generating stations the total capability of the generating stations owned and leased by the utility operating companies and system energy as of december 31 , 2011 , is indicated below: .
|company|owned and leased capability mw ( 1 ) total|owned and leased capability mw ( 1 ) gas/oil|owned and leased capability mw ( 1 ) nuclear|owned and leased capability mw ( 1 ) coal|owned and leased capability mw ( 1 ) hydro|
|entergy arkansas|4774|1668|1823|1209|74|
|entergy gulf states louisiana|3317|1980|974|363|-|
|entergy louisiana|5424|4265|1159|-|-|
|entergy mississippi|3229|2809|-|420|-|
|entergy new orleans|764|764|-|-|-|
|entergy texas|2538|2269|-|269|-|
|system energy|1071|-|1071|-|-|
|total|21117|13755|5027|2261|74|
( 1 ) 201cowned and leased capability 201d is the dependable load carrying capability as demonstrated under actual operating conditions based on the primary fuel ( assuming no curtailments ) that each station was designed to utilize . the entergy system's load and capacity projections are reviewed periodically to assess the need and timing for additional generating capacity and interconnections . these reviews consider existing and projected demand , the availability and price of power , the location of new load , and the economy . summer peak load in the entergy system service territory has averaged 21246 mw from 2002-2011 . in the 2002 time period , the entergy system's long-term capacity resources , allowing for an adequate reserve margin , were approximately 3000 mw less than the total capacity required for peak period demands . in this time period the entergy system met its capacity shortages almost entirely through short-term power purchases in the wholesale spot market . in the fall of 2002 , the entergy system began a program to add new resources to its existing generation portfolio and began a process of issuing requests for proposals ( rfp ) to procure supply-side resources from sources other than the spot market to meet the unique regional needs of the utility operating companies . the entergy system has adopted a long-term resource strategy that calls for the bulk of capacity needs to be met through long-term resources , whether owned or contracted . entergy refers to this strategy as the "portfolio transformation strategy" . over the past nine years , portfolio transformation has resulted in the addition of about 4500 mw of new long-term resources . these figures do not include transactions currently pending as a result of the summer 2009 rfp . when the summer 2009 rfp transactions are included in the entergy system portfolio of long-term resources and adjusting for unit deactivations of older generation , the entergy system is approximately 500 mw short of its projected 2012 peak load plus reserve margin . this remaining need is expected to be met through a nuclear uprate at grand gulf and limited-term resources . the entergy system will continue to access the spot power market to economically .
Question: what portion of the total capabilities is generated from nuclear station for entergy as a whole? | 0.23805 | ### Transformed FinQA Question Generation Instructions
#### Step 1: Analyze and Understand the Original FinQA Question
- Objective: Use the given FinQA question to generate a new, logically similar but numerically different question.
- Guidelines:
- Identify the financial concepts and quantitative reasoning in the original question.
- Determine the key variables (e.g., revenue, profit, growth rate, interest) and their relationships.
- Maintain the original question’s structure and complexity.
#### Step 2: Transform and Adapt
- Objective: Create a new FinQA-style question while modifying numerical values and conditions.
- Guidelines:
- Change financial figures, constraints, or business conditions to create a unique question.
- Ensure the transformation maintains financial realism (e.g., realistic market trends, interest rates).
- Retain the original reasoning and computational steps while introducing fresh data points.
#### Step 3: Generate the New FinQA Question
- Objective: Output an original, transformed FinQA question without providing an answer or solution.
- Guidelines:
- Ensure the new question aligns with FinQA’s format and complexity.
- Maintain clarity and well-defined financial relationships.
### Response Rule
- **Generate only the "Transformed FinQA Question" for the given example without including any answer, explanation, or solution.**
### Output Format
#### Transformed FinQA Question: [Write your transformed FinQA question here.]
----
#### Task
#### Original FinQA Question: Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: part i item 1 entergy corporation , utility operating companies , and system energy entergy new orleans provides electric and gas service in the city of new orleans pursuant to indeterminate permits set forth in city ordinances ( except electric service in algiers , which is provided by entergy louisiana ) . these ordinances contain a continuing option for the city of new orleans to purchase entergy new orleans 2019s electric and gas utility properties . entergy texas holds a certificate of convenience and necessity from the puct to provide electric service to areas within approximately 27 counties in eastern texas , and holds non-exclusive franchises to provide electric service in approximately 68 incorporated municipalities . entergy texas was typically granted 50-year franchises , but recently has been receiving 25-year franchises . entergy texas 2019s electric franchises expire during 2013-2058 . the business of system energy is limited to wholesale power sales . it has no distribution franchises . property and other generation resources generating stations the total capability of the generating stations owned and leased by the utility operating companies and system energy as of december 31 , 2011 , is indicated below: .
|company|owned and leased capability mw ( 1 ) total|owned and leased capability mw ( 1 ) gas/oil|owned and leased capability mw ( 1 ) nuclear|owned and leased capability mw ( 1 ) coal|owned and leased capability mw ( 1 ) hydro|
|entergy arkansas|4774|1668|1823|1209|74|
|entergy gulf states louisiana|3317|1980|974|363|-|
|entergy louisiana|5424|4265|1159|-|-|
|entergy mississippi|3229|2809|-|420|-|
|entergy new orleans|764|764|-|-|-|
|entergy texas|2538|2269|-|269|-|
|system energy|1071|-|1071|-|-|
|total|21117|13755|5027|2261|74|
( 1 ) 201cowned and leased capability 201d is the dependable load carrying capability as demonstrated under actual operating conditions based on the primary fuel ( assuming no curtailments ) that each station was designed to utilize . the entergy system's load and capacity projections are reviewed periodically to assess the need and timing for additional generating capacity and interconnections . these reviews consider existing and projected demand , the availability and price of power , the location of new load , and the economy . summer peak load in the entergy system service territory has averaged 21246 mw from 2002-2011 . in the 2002 time period , the entergy system's long-term capacity resources , allowing for an adequate reserve margin , were approximately 3000 mw less than the total capacity required for peak period demands . in this time period the entergy system met its capacity shortages almost entirely through short-term power purchases in the wholesale spot market . in the fall of 2002 , the entergy system began a program to add new resources to its existing generation portfolio and began a process of issuing requests for proposals ( rfp ) to procure supply-side resources from sources other than the spot market to meet the unique regional needs of the utility operating companies . the entergy system has adopted a long-term resource strategy that calls for the bulk of capacity needs to be met through long-term resources , whether owned or contracted . entergy refers to this strategy as the "portfolio transformation strategy" . over the past nine years , portfolio transformation has resulted in the addition of about 4500 mw of new long-term resources . these figures do not include transactions currently pending as a result of the summer 2009 rfp . when the summer 2009 rfp transactions are included in the entergy system portfolio of long-term resources and adjusting for unit deactivations of older generation , the entergy system is approximately 500 mw short of its projected 2012 peak load plus reserve margin . this remaining need is expected to be met through a nuclear uprate at grand gulf and limited-term resources . the entergy system will continue to access the spot power market to economically .
Question: what portion of the total capabilities is generated from nuclear station for entergy as a whole? |
Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: liquidity and capital resources we currently expect to fund all of our cash requirements which are reasonably foreseeable for 2018 , including scheduled debt repayments , new investments in the business , share repurchases , dividend payments , possible business acquisitions and pension contributions , with cash from operating activities , and as needed , additional short-term and/or long-term borrowings . we continue to expect our operating cash flow to remain strong . as of december 31 , 2017 , we had $ 211 million of cash and cash equivalents on hand , of which $ 151 million was held outside of the as of december 31 , 2016 , we had $ 327 million of cash and cash equivalents on hand , of which $ 184 million was held outside of the u.s . as of december 31 , 2015 , we had $ 26 million of deferred tax liabilities for pre-acquisition foreign earnings associated with the legacy nalco entities and legacy champion entities that we intended to repatriate . these liabilities were recorded as part of the respective purchase price accounting of each transaction . the remaining foreign earnings were repatriated in 2016 , reducing the deferred tax liabilities to zero at december 31 , 2016 . as of december 31 , 2017 we had a $ 2.0 billion multi-year credit facility , which expires in november 2022 . the credit facility has been established with a diverse syndicate of banks . there were no borrowings under our credit facility as of december 31 , 2017 or 2016 . the credit facility supports our $ 2.0 billion u.s . commercial paper program and $ 2.0 billion european commercial paper program . combined borrowing under these two commercial paper programs may not exceed $ 2.0 billion . at year-end , we had no amount outstanding under the european commercial paper program and no amount outstanding under the u.s . commercial paper program . additionally , we have uncommitted credit lines of $ 660 million with major international banks and financial institutions to support our general global funding needs . most of these lines are used to support global cash pooling structures . approximately $ 643 million of these credit lines were available for use as of year-end 2017 . bank supported letters of credit , surety bonds and guarantees total $ 198 million and represent commercial business transactions . we do not have any other significant unconditional purchase obligations or commercial commitments . as of december 31 , 2017 , our short-term borrowing program was rated a-2 by standard & poor 2019s and p-2 by moody 2019s . as of december 31 , 2017 , standard & poor 2019s and moody 2019s rated our long-term credit at a- ( stable outlook ) and baa1 ( stable outlook ) , respectively . a reduction in our credit ratings could limit or preclude our ability to issue commercial paper under our current programs , or could also adversely affect our ability to renew existing , or negotiate new , credit facilities in the future and could increase the cost of these facilities . should this occur , we could seek additional sources of funding , including issuing additional term notes or bonds . in addition , we have the ability , at our option , to draw upon our $ 2.0 billion of committed credit facility . we are in compliance with our debt covenants and other requirements of our credit agreements and indentures . a schedule of our various obligations as of december 31 , 2017 are summarized in the following table: .
|( millions )|total|payments due by period less than 1 year|payments due by period 2-3 years|payments due by period 4-5 years|payments due by period more than 5 years|
|notes payable|$ 15|$ 15|$ -|$ -|$ -|
|one-time transition tax|160|13|26|26|95|
|long-term debt|7303|549|696|1513|4545|
|capital lease obligations|5|1|1|1|2|
|operating leases|617|131|211|160|115|
|interest*|2753|242|436|375|1700|
|total|$ 10853|$ 951|$ 1370|$ 2075|$ 6457|
* interest on variable rate debt was calculated using the interest rate at year-end 2017 . during the fourth quarter of 2017 , we recorded a one-time transition tax related to enactment of the tax act . the expense is primarily related to the one-time transition tax , which is payable over eight years . as discussed further in note 12 , this balance is a provisional amount and is subject to adjustment during the measurement period of up to one year following the enactment of the tax act , as provided by recent sec guidance . as of december 31 , 2017 , our gross liability for uncertain tax positions was $ 68 million . we are not able to reasonably estimate the amount by which the liability will increase or decrease over an extended period of time or whether a cash settlement of the liability will be required . therefore , these amounts have been excluded from the schedule of contractual obligations. .
Question: what percent of operating lease payments are due in less than one year? | 0.21232 | ### Transformed FinQA Question Generation Instructions
#### Step 1: Analyze and Understand the Original FinQA Question
- Objective: Use the given FinQA question to generate a new, logically similar but numerically different question.
- Guidelines:
- Identify the financial concepts and quantitative reasoning in the original question.
- Determine the key variables (e.g., revenue, profit, growth rate, interest) and their relationships.
- Maintain the original question’s structure and complexity.
#### Step 2: Transform and Adapt
- Objective: Create a new FinQA-style question while modifying numerical values and conditions.
- Guidelines:
- Change financial figures, constraints, or business conditions to create a unique question.
- Ensure the transformation maintains financial realism (e.g., realistic market trends, interest rates).
- Retain the original reasoning and computational steps while introducing fresh data points.
#### Step 3: Generate the New FinQA Question
- Objective: Output an original, transformed FinQA question without providing an answer or solution.
- Guidelines:
- Ensure the new question aligns with FinQA’s format and complexity.
- Maintain clarity and well-defined financial relationships.
### Response Rule
- **Generate only the "Transformed FinQA Question" for the given example without including any answer, explanation, or solution.**
### Output Format
#### Transformed FinQA Question: [Write your transformed FinQA question here.]
----
#### Task
#### Original FinQA Question: Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: liquidity and capital resources we currently expect to fund all of our cash requirements which are reasonably foreseeable for 2018 , including scheduled debt repayments , new investments in the business , share repurchases , dividend payments , possible business acquisitions and pension contributions , with cash from operating activities , and as needed , additional short-term and/or long-term borrowings . we continue to expect our operating cash flow to remain strong . as of december 31 , 2017 , we had $ 211 million of cash and cash equivalents on hand , of which $ 151 million was held outside of the as of december 31 , 2016 , we had $ 327 million of cash and cash equivalents on hand , of which $ 184 million was held outside of the u.s . as of december 31 , 2015 , we had $ 26 million of deferred tax liabilities for pre-acquisition foreign earnings associated with the legacy nalco entities and legacy champion entities that we intended to repatriate . these liabilities were recorded as part of the respective purchase price accounting of each transaction . the remaining foreign earnings were repatriated in 2016 , reducing the deferred tax liabilities to zero at december 31 , 2016 . as of december 31 , 2017 we had a $ 2.0 billion multi-year credit facility , which expires in november 2022 . the credit facility has been established with a diverse syndicate of banks . there were no borrowings under our credit facility as of december 31 , 2017 or 2016 . the credit facility supports our $ 2.0 billion u.s . commercial paper program and $ 2.0 billion european commercial paper program . combined borrowing under these two commercial paper programs may not exceed $ 2.0 billion . at year-end , we had no amount outstanding under the european commercial paper program and no amount outstanding under the u.s . commercial paper program . additionally , we have uncommitted credit lines of $ 660 million with major international banks and financial institutions to support our general global funding needs . most of these lines are used to support global cash pooling structures . approximately $ 643 million of these credit lines were available for use as of year-end 2017 . bank supported letters of credit , surety bonds and guarantees total $ 198 million and represent commercial business transactions . we do not have any other significant unconditional purchase obligations or commercial commitments . as of december 31 , 2017 , our short-term borrowing program was rated a-2 by standard & poor 2019s and p-2 by moody 2019s . as of december 31 , 2017 , standard & poor 2019s and moody 2019s rated our long-term credit at a- ( stable outlook ) and baa1 ( stable outlook ) , respectively . a reduction in our credit ratings could limit or preclude our ability to issue commercial paper under our current programs , or could also adversely affect our ability to renew existing , or negotiate new , credit facilities in the future and could increase the cost of these facilities . should this occur , we could seek additional sources of funding , including issuing additional term notes or bonds . in addition , we have the ability , at our option , to draw upon our $ 2.0 billion of committed credit facility . we are in compliance with our debt covenants and other requirements of our credit agreements and indentures . a schedule of our various obligations as of december 31 , 2017 are summarized in the following table: .
|( millions )|total|payments due by period less than 1 year|payments due by period 2-3 years|payments due by period 4-5 years|payments due by period more than 5 years|
|notes payable|$ 15|$ 15|$ -|$ -|$ -|
|one-time transition tax|160|13|26|26|95|
|long-term debt|7303|549|696|1513|4545|
|capital lease obligations|5|1|1|1|2|
|operating leases|617|131|211|160|115|
|interest*|2753|242|436|375|1700|
|total|$ 10853|$ 951|$ 1370|$ 2075|$ 6457|
* interest on variable rate debt was calculated using the interest rate at year-end 2017 . during the fourth quarter of 2017 , we recorded a one-time transition tax related to enactment of the tax act . the expense is primarily related to the one-time transition tax , which is payable over eight years . as discussed further in note 12 , this balance is a provisional amount and is subject to adjustment during the measurement period of up to one year following the enactment of the tax act , as provided by recent sec guidance . as of december 31 , 2017 , our gross liability for uncertain tax positions was $ 68 million . we are not able to reasonably estimate the amount by which the liability will increase or decrease over an extended period of time or whether a cash settlement of the liability will be required . therefore , these amounts have been excluded from the schedule of contractual obligations. .
Question: what percent of operating lease payments are due in less than one year? |
Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: improvements are amortized using the straight-line method over the lesser of the remaining respective lease term or estimated useful lives ranging from 1 to 15 years . goodwill , purchased intangibles and other long-lived assets we review our goodwill for impairment annually , or more frequently , if facts and circumstances warrant a review . we completed our annual impairment test in the second quarter of fiscal 2011 and determined that there was no impairment . in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2011 , we announced changes to our business strategy which resulted in a reduction of forecasted revenue for certain of our products . we performed an update to our goodwill impairment test for the enterprise reporting unit and determined there was no impairment . goodwill is assigned to one or more reporting segments on the date of acquisition . we evaluate goodwill for impairment by comparing the fair value of each of our reporting segments to its carrying value , including the associated goodwill . to determine the fair values , we use the market approach based on comparable publicly traded companies in similar lines of businesses and the income approach based on estimated discounted future cash flows . our cash flow assumptions consider historical and forecasted revenue , operating costs and other relevant factors . we amortize intangible assets with finite lives over their estimated useful lives and review them for impairment whenever an impairment indicator exists . we continually monitor events and changes in circumstances that could indicate carrying amounts of our long-lived assets , including our intangible assets may not be recoverable . when such events or changes in circumstances occur , we assess recoverability by determining whether the carrying value of such assets will be recovered through the undiscounted expected future cash flows . if the future undiscounted cash flows are less than the carrying amount of these assets , we recognize an impairment loss based on any excess of the carrying amount over the fair value of the assets . we did not recognize any intangible asset impairment charges in fiscal 2011 , 2010 or 2009 . our intangible assets are amortized over their estimated useful lives of 1 to 13 years . amortization is based on the pattern in which the economic benefits of the intangible asset will be consumed . the weighted average useful lives of our intangibles assets was as follows: .
||weighted averageuseful life ( years )|
|purchased technology|6|
|customer contracts and relationships|10|
|trademarks|7|
|acquired rights to use technology|9|
|localization|1|
|other intangibles|3|
weighted average useful life ( years ) software development costs capitalization of software development costs for software to be sold , leased , or otherwise marketed begins upon the establishment of technological feasibility , which is generally the completion of a working prototype that has been certified as having no critical bugs and is a release candidate . amortization begins once the software is ready for its intended use , generally based on the pattern in which the economic benefits will be consumed . to date , software development costs incurred between completion of a working prototype and general availability of the related product have not been material . internal use software we capitalize costs associated with customized internal-use software systems that have reached the application development stage . such capitalized costs include external direct costs utilized in developing or obtaining the applications and payroll and payroll-related expenses for employees , who are directly associated with the development of the applications . capitalization of such costs begins when the preliminary project stage is complete and ceases at the point in which the project is substantially complete and is ready for its intended purpose . table of contents adobe systems incorporated notes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) .
Question: what is the average yearly amortization rate related to trademarks? | 14.28571 | ### Transformed FinQA Question Generation Instructions
#### Step 1: Analyze and Understand the Original FinQA Question
- Objective: Use the given FinQA question to generate a new, logically similar but numerically different question.
- Guidelines:
- Identify the financial concepts and quantitative reasoning in the original question.
- Determine the key variables (e.g., revenue, profit, growth rate, interest) and their relationships.
- Maintain the original question’s structure and complexity.
#### Step 2: Transform and Adapt
- Objective: Create a new FinQA-style question while modifying numerical values and conditions.
- Guidelines:
- Change financial figures, constraints, or business conditions to create a unique question.
- Ensure the transformation maintains financial realism (e.g., realistic market trends, interest rates).
- Retain the original reasoning and computational steps while introducing fresh data points.
#### Step 3: Generate the New FinQA Question
- Objective: Output an original, transformed FinQA question without providing an answer or solution.
- Guidelines:
- Ensure the new question aligns with FinQA’s format and complexity.
- Maintain clarity and well-defined financial relationships.
### Response Rule
- **Generate only the "Transformed FinQA Question" for the given example without including any answer, explanation, or solution.**
### Output Format
#### Transformed FinQA Question: [Write your transformed FinQA question here.]
----
#### Task
#### Original FinQA Question: Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: improvements are amortized using the straight-line method over the lesser of the remaining respective lease term or estimated useful lives ranging from 1 to 15 years . goodwill , purchased intangibles and other long-lived assets we review our goodwill for impairment annually , or more frequently , if facts and circumstances warrant a review . we completed our annual impairment test in the second quarter of fiscal 2011 and determined that there was no impairment . in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2011 , we announced changes to our business strategy which resulted in a reduction of forecasted revenue for certain of our products . we performed an update to our goodwill impairment test for the enterprise reporting unit and determined there was no impairment . goodwill is assigned to one or more reporting segments on the date of acquisition . we evaluate goodwill for impairment by comparing the fair value of each of our reporting segments to its carrying value , including the associated goodwill . to determine the fair values , we use the market approach based on comparable publicly traded companies in similar lines of businesses and the income approach based on estimated discounted future cash flows . our cash flow assumptions consider historical and forecasted revenue , operating costs and other relevant factors . we amortize intangible assets with finite lives over their estimated useful lives and review them for impairment whenever an impairment indicator exists . we continually monitor events and changes in circumstances that could indicate carrying amounts of our long-lived assets , including our intangible assets may not be recoverable . when such events or changes in circumstances occur , we assess recoverability by determining whether the carrying value of such assets will be recovered through the undiscounted expected future cash flows . if the future undiscounted cash flows are less than the carrying amount of these assets , we recognize an impairment loss based on any excess of the carrying amount over the fair value of the assets . we did not recognize any intangible asset impairment charges in fiscal 2011 , 2010 or 2009 . our intangible assets are amortized over their estimated useful lives of 1 to 13 years . amortization is based on the pattern in which the economic benefits of the intangible asset will be consumed . the weighted average useful lives of our intangibles assets was as follows: .
||weighted averageuseful life ( years )|
|purchased technology|6|
|customer contracts and relationships|10|
|trademarks|7|
|acquired rights to use technology|9|
|localization|1|
|other intangibles|3|
weighted average useful life ( years ) software development costs capitalization of software development costs for software to be sold , leased , or otherwise marketed begins upon the establishment of technological feasibility , which is generally the completion of a working prototype that has been certified as having no critical bugs and is a release candidate . amortization begins once the software is ready for its intended use , generally based on the pattern in which the economic benefits will be consumed . to date , software development costs incurred between completion of a working prototype and general availability of the related product have not been material . internal use software we capitalize costs associated with customized internal-use software systems that have reached the application development stage . such capitalized costs include external direct costs utilized in developing or obtaining the applications and payroll and payroll-related expenses for employees , who are directly associated with the development of the applications . capitalization of such costs begins when the preliminary project stage is complete and ceases at the point in which the project is substantially complete and is ready for its intended purpose . table of contents adobe systems incorporated notes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) .
Question: what is the average yearly amortization rate related to trademarks? |
Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: other expense , net increased $ 0.8 million to $ 7.2 million in 2015 from $ 6.4 million in 2014 . this increase was due to higher net losses on the combined foreign currency exchange rate changes on transactions denominated in foreign currencies and our foreign currency derivative financial instruments in 2015 . provision for income taxes increased $ 19.9 million to $ 154.1 million in 2015 from $ 134.2 million in 2014 . our effective tax rate was 39.9% ( 39.9 % ) in 2015 compared to 39.2% ( 39.2 % ) in 2014 . our effective tax rate for 2015 was higher than the effective tax rate for 2014 primarily due to increased non-deductible costs incurred in connection with our connected fitness acquisitions in 2015 . year ended december 31 , 2014 compared to year ended december 31 , 2013 net revenues increased $ 752.3 million , or 32.3% ( 32.3 % ) , to $ 3084.4 million in 2014 from $ 2332.1 million in 2013 . net revenues by product category are summarized below: .
|( in thousands )|year ended december 31 , 2014|year ended december 31 , 2013|year ended december 31 , $ change|year ended december 31 , % ( % ) change|
|apparel|$ 2291520|$ 1762150|$ 529370|30.0% ( 30.0 % )|
|footwear|430987|298825|132162|44.2|
|accessories|275409|216098|59311|27.4|
|total net sales|2997916|2277073|720843|31.7|
|license revenues|67229|53910|13319|24.7|
|connected fitness|19225|1068|18157|1700.1|
|total net revenues|$ 3084370|$ 2332051|$ 752319|32.3% ( 32.3 % )|
the increase in net sales were driven primarily by : 2022 apparel unit sales growth and new offerings in multiple lines led by training , hunt and golf ; and 2022 footwear unit sales growth , led by running and basketball . license revenues increased $ 13.3 million , or 24.7% ( 24.7 % ) , to $ 67.2 million in 2014 from $ 53.9 million in 2013 . this increase in license revenues was primarily a result of increased distribution and continued unit volume growth by our licensees . connected fitness revenue increased $ 18.1 million to $ 19.2 million in 2014 from $ 1.1 million in 2013 primarily due to a full year of revenue from our connected fitness business in 2014 compared to one month in gross profit increased $ 375.5 million to $ 1512.2 million in 2014 from $ 1136.7 million in 2013 . gross profit as a percentage of net revenues , or gross margin , increased 30 basis points to 49.0% ( 49.0 % ) in 2014 compared to 48.7% ( 48.7 % ) in 2013 . the increase in gross margin percentage was primarily driven by the following : 2022 approximate 20 basis point increase driven primarily by decreased sales mix of excess inventory through our factory house outlet stores ; and 2022 approximate 20 basis point increase as a result of higher duty costs recorded during the prior year on certain products imported in previous years . the above increases were partially offset by : 2022 approximate 10 basis point decrease by unfavorable foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations. .
Question: in 2014 what was the percent of the sales revenues of apparel to the total revenues | 0.74295 | ### Transformed FinQA Question Generation Instructions
#### Step 1: Analyze and Understand the Original FinQA Question
- Objective: Use the given FinQA question to generate a new, logically similar but numerically different question.
- Guidelines:
- Identify the financial concepts and quantitative reasoning in the original question.
- Determine the key variables (e.g., revenue, profit, growth rate, interest) and their relationships.
- Maintain the original question’s structure and complexity.
#### Step 2: Transform and Adapt
- Objective: Create a new FinQA-style question while modifying numerical values and conditions.
- Guidelines:
- Change financial figures, constraints, or business conditions to create a unique question.
- Ensure the transformation maintains financial realism (e.g., realistic market trends, interest rates).
- Retain the original reasoning and computational steps while introducing fresh data points.
#### Step 3: Generate the New FinQA Question
- Objective: Output an original, transformed FinQA question without providing an answer or solution.
- Guidelines:
- Ensure the new question aligns with FinQA’s format and complexity.
- Maintain clarity and well-defined financial relationships.
### Response Rule
- **Generate only the "Transformed FinQA Question" for the given example without including any answer, explanation, or solution.**
### Output Format
#### Transformed FinQA Question: [Write your transformed FinQA question here.]
----
#### Task
#### Original FinQA Question: Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: other expense , net increased $ 0.8 million to $ 7.2 million in 2015 from $ 6.4 million in 2014 . this increase was due to higher net losses on the combined foreign currency exchange rate changes on transactions denominated in foreign currencies and our foreign currency derivative financial instruments in 2015 . provision for income taxes increased $ 19.9 million to $ 154.1 million in 2015 from $ 134.2 million in 2014 . our effective tax rate was 39.9% ( 39.9 % ) in 2015 compared to 39.2% ( 39.2 % ) in 2014 . our effective tax rate for 2015 was higher than the effective tax rate for 2014 primarily due to increased non-deductible costs incurred in connection with our connected fitness acquisitions in 2015 . year ended december 31 , 2014 compared to year ended december 31 , 2013 net revenues increased $ 752.3 million , or 32.3% ( 32.3 % ) , to $ 3084.4 million in 2014 from $ 2332.1 million in 2013 . net revenues by product category are summarized below: .
|( in thousands )|year ended december 31 , 2014|year ended december 31 , 2013|year ended december 31 , $ change|year ended december 31 , % ( % ) change|
|apparel|$ 2291520|$ 1762150|$ 529370|30.0% ( 30.0 % )|
|footwear|430987|298825|132162|44.2|
|accessories|275409|216098|59311|27.4|
|total net sales|2997916|2277073|720843|31.7|
|license revenues|67229|53910|13319|24.7|
|connected fitness|19225|1068|18157|1700.1|
|total net revenues|$ 3084370|$ 2332051|$ 752319|32.3% ( 32.3 % )|
the increase in net sales were driven primarily by : 2022 apparel unit sales growth and new offerings in multiple lines led by training , hunt and golf ; and 2022 footwear unit sales growth , led by running and basketball . license revenues increased $ 13.3 million , or 24.7% ( 24.7 % ) , to $ 67.2 million in 2014 from $ 53.9 million in 2013 . this increase in license revenues was primarily a result of increased distribution and continued unit volume growth by our licensees . connected fitness revenue increased $ 18.1 million to $ 19.2 million in 2014 from $ 1.1 million in 2013 primarily due to a full year of revenue from our connected fitness business in 2014 compared to one month in gross profit increased $ 375.5 million to $ 1512.2 million in 2014 from $ 1136.7 million in 2013 . gross profit as a percentage of net revenues , or gross margin , increased 30 basis points to 49.0% ( 49.0 % ) in 2014 compared to 48.7% ( 48.7 % ) in 2013 . the increase in gross margin percentage was primarily driven by the following : 2022 approximate 20 basis point increase driven primarily by decreased sales mix of excess inventory through our factory house outlet stores ; and 2022 approximate 20 basis point increase as a result of higher duty costs recorded during the prior year on certain products imported in previous years . the above increases were partially offset by : 2022 approximate 10 basis point decrease by unfavorable foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations. .
Question: in 2014 what was the percent of the sales revenues of apparel to the total revenues |
Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: agreements associated with the agency securitizations , most sale agreements do not provide for penalties or other remedies if we do not respond timely to investor indemnification or repurchase requests . origination and sale of residential mortgages is an ongoing business activity and , accordingly , management continually assesses the need to recognize indemnification and repurchase liabilities pursuant to the associated investor sale agreements . we establish indemnification and repurchase liabilities for estimated losses on sold first and second-lien mortgages and home equity loans/lines for which indemnification is expected to be provided or for loans that are expected to be repurchased . for the first and second-lien mortgage sold portfolio , we have established an indemnification and repurchase liability pursuant to investor sale agreements based on claims made and our estimate of future claims on a loan by loan basis . these relate primarily to loans originated during 2006-2008 . for the home equity loans/lines sold portfolio , we have established indemnification and repurchase liabilities based upon this same methodology for loans sold during 2005-2007 . indemnification and repurchase liabilities are initially recognized when loans are sold to investors and are subsequently evaluated by management . initial recognition and subsequent adjustments to the indemnification and repurchase liability for the sold residential mortgage portfolio are recognized in residential mortgage revenue on the consolidated income statement . since pnc is no longer engaged in the brokered home equity lending business , only subsequent adjustments are recognized to the home equity loans/lines indemnification and repurchase liability . these adjustments are recognized in other noninterest income on the consolidated income statement . management 2019s subsequent evaluation of these indemnification and repurchase liabilities is based upon trends in indemnification and repurchase requests , actual loss experience , risks in the underlying serviced loan portfolios , and current economic conditions . as part of its evaluation , management considers estimated loss projections over the life of the subject loan portfolio . at december 31 , 2011 and december 31 , 2010 , the total indemnification and repurchase liability for estimated losses on indemnification and repurchase claims totaled $ 130 million and $ 294 million , respectively , and was included in other liabilities on the consolidated balance sheet . an analysis of the changes in this liability during 2011 and 2010 follows : analysis of indemnification and repurchase liability for asserted claims and unasserted claims .
|in millions|2011 residential mortgages ( a )|2011 home equity loans/lines ( b )|2011 total|2011 residential mortgages ( a )|2011 home equity loans/lines ( b )|total|
|january 1|$ 144|$ 150|$ 294|$ 229|$ 41|$ 270|
|reserve adjustments net|102|4|106|120|144|264|
|losses 2013 loan repurchases and settlements|-163 ( 163 )|-107 ( 107 )|-270 ( 270 )|-205 ( 205 )|-35 ( 35 )|-240 ( 240 )|
|december 31|$ 83|$ 47|$ 130|$ 144|$ 150|$ 294|
( a ) repurchase obligation associated with sold loan portfolios of $ 121.4 billion and $ 139.8 billion at december 31 , 2011 and december 31 , 2010 , respectively . ( b ) repurchase obligation associated with sold loan portfolios of $ 4.5 billion and $ 6.5 billion at december 31 , 2011 and december 31 , 2010 , respectively . pnc is no longer engaged in the brokered home equity lending business , which was acquired with national city . management believes our indemnification and repurchase liabilities appropriately reflect the estimated probable losses on investor indemnification and repurchase claims at december 31 , 2011 and 2010 . while management seeks to obtain all relevant information in estimating the indemnification and repurchase liability , the estimation process is inherently uncertain and imprecise and , accordingly , it is reasonably possible that future indemnification and repurchase losses could be more or less than our established liability . factors that could affect our estimate include the volume of valid claims driven by investor strategies and behavior , our ability to successfully negotiate claims with investors , housing prices , and other economic conditions . at december 31 , 2011 , we estimate that it is reasonably possible that we could incur additional losses in excess of our indemnification and repurchase liability of up to $ 85 million . this estimate of potential additional losses in excess of our liability is based on assumed higher investor demands , lower claim rescissions , and lower home prices than our current assumptions . reinsurance agreements we have two wholly-owned captive insurance subsidiaries which provide reinsurance to third-party insurers related to insurance sold to our customers . these subsidiaries enter into various types of reinsurance agreements with third-party insurers where the subsidiary assumes the risk of loss through either an excess of loss or quota share agreement up to 100% ( 100 % ) reinsurance . in excess of loss agreements , these subsidiaries assume the risk of loss for an excess layer of coverage up to specified limits , once a defined first loss percentage is met . in quota share agreements , the subsidiaries and third-party insurers share the responsibility for payment of all claims . these subsidiaries provide reinsurance for accidental death & dismemberment , credit life , accident & health , lender placed 200 the pnc financial services group , inc . 2013 form 10-k .
Question: what was the ratio of the the total indemnification and repurchase liability for estimated losses on indemnification and repurchase claims \\n | 424.0 | ### Transformed FinQA Question Generation Instructions
#### Step 1: Analyze and Understand the Original FinQA Question
- Objective: Use the given FinQA question to generate a new, logically similar but numerically different question.
- Guidelines:
- Identify the financial concepts and quantitative reasoning in the original question.
- Determine the key variables (e.g., revenue, profit, growth rate, interest) and their relationships.
- Maintain the original question’s structure and complexity.
#### Step 2: Transform and Adapt
- Objective: Create a new FinQA-style question while modifying numerical values and conditions.
- Guidelines:
- Change financial figures, constraints, or business conditions to create a unique question.
- Ensure the transformation maintains financial realism (e.g., realistic market trends, interest rates).
- Retain the original reasoning and computational steps while introducing fresh data points.
#### Step 3: Generate the New FinQA Question
- Objective: Output an original, transformed FinQA question without providing an answer or solution.
- Guidelines:
- Ensure the new question aligns with FinQA’s format and complexity.
- Maintain clarity and well-defined financial relationships.
### Response Rule
- **Generate only the "Transformed FinQA Question" for the given example without including any answer, explanation, or solution.**
### Output Format
#### Transformed FinQA Question: [Write your transformed FinQA question here.]
----
#### Task
#### Original FinQA Question: Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: agreements associated with the agency securitizations , most sale agreements do not provide for penalties or other remedies if we do not respond timely to investor indemnification or repurchase requests . origination and sale of residential mortgages is an ongoing business activity and , accordingly , management continually assesses the need to recognize indemnification and repurchase liabilities pursuant to the associated investor sale agreements . we establish indemnification and repurchase liabilities for estimated losses on sold first and second-lien mortgages and home equity loans/lines for which indemnification is expected to be provided or for loans that are expected to be repurchased . for the first and second-lien mortgage sold portfolio , we have established an indemnification and repurchase liability pursuant to investor sale agreements based on claims made and our estimate of future claims on a loan by loan basis . these relate primarily to loans originated during 2006-2008 . for the home equity loans/lines sold portfolio , we have established indemnification and repurchase liabilities based upon this same methodology for loans sold during 2005-2007 . indemnification and repurchase liabilities are initially recognized when loans are sold to investors and are subsequently evaluated by management . initial recognition and subsequent adjustments to the indemnification and repurchase liability for the sold residential mortgage portfolio are recognized in residential mortgage revenue on the consolidated income statement . since pnc is no longer engaged in the brokered home equity lending business , only subsequent adjustments are recognized to the home equity loans/lines indemnification and repurchase liability . these adjustments are recognized in other noninterest income on the consolidated income statement . management 2019s subsequent evaluation of these indemnification and repurchase liabilities is based upon trends in indemnification and repurchase requests , actual loss experience , risks in the underlying serviced loan portfolios , and current economic conditions . as part of its evaluation , management considers estimated loss projections over the life of the subject loan portfolio . at december 31 , 2011 and december 31 , 2010 , the total indemnification and repurchase liability for estimated losses on indemnification and repurchase claims totaled $ 130 million and $ 294 million , respectively , and was included in other liabilities on the consolidated balance sheet . an analysis of the changes in this liability during 2011 and 2010 follows : analysis of indemnification and repurchase liability for asserted claims and unasserted claims .
|in millions|2011 residential mortgages ( a )|2011 home equity loans/lines ( b )|2011 total|2011 residential mortgages ( a )|2011 home equity loans/lines ( b )|total|
|january 1|$ 144|$ 150|$ 294|$ 229|$ 41|$ 270|
|reserve adjustments net|102|4|106|120|144|264|
|losses 2013 loan repurchases and settlements|-163 ( 163 )|-107 ( 107 )|-270 ( 270 )|-205 ( 205 )|-35 ( 35 )|-240 ( 240 )|
|december 31|$ 83|$ 47|$ 130|$ 144|$ 150|$ 294|
( a ) repurchase obligation associated with sold loan portfolios of $ 121.4 billion and $ 139.8 billion at december 31 , 2011 and december 31 , 2010 , respectively . ( b ) repurchase obligation associated with sold loan portfolios of $ 4.5 billion and $ 6.5 billion at december 31 , 2011 and december 31 , 2010 , respectively . pnc is no longer engaged in the brokered home equity lending business , which was acquired with national city . management believes our indemnification and repurchase liabilities appropriately reflect the estimated probable losses on investor indemnification and repurchase claims at december 31 , 2011 and 2010 . while management seeks to obtain all relevant information in estimating the indemnification and repurchase liability , the estimation process is inherently uncertain and imprecise and , accordingly , it is reasonably possible that future indemnification and repurchase losses could be more or less than our established liability . factors that could affect our estimate include the volume of valid claims driven by investor strategies and behavior , our ability to successfully negotiate claims with investors , housing prices , and other economic conditions . at december 31 , 2011 , we estimate that it is reasonably possible that we could incur additional losses in excess of our indemnification and repurchase liability of up to $ 85 million . this estimate of potential additional losses in excess of our liability is based on assumed higher investor demands , lower claim rescissions , and lower home prices than our current assumptions . reinsurance agreements we have two wholly-owned captive insurance subsidiaries which provide reinsurance to third-party insurers related to insurance sold to our customers . these subsidiaries enter into various types of reinsurance agreements with third-party insurers where the subsidiary assumes the risk of loss through either an excess of loss or quota share agreement up to 100% ( 100 % ) reinsurance . in excess of loss agreements , these subsidiaries assume the risk of loss for an excess layer of coverage up to specified limits , once a defined first loss percentage is met . in quota share agreements , the subsidiaries and third-party insurers share the responsibility for payment of all claims . these subsidiaries provide reinsurance for accidental death & dismemberment , credit life , accident & health , lender placed 200 the pnc financial services group , inc . 2013 form 10-k .
Question: what was the ratio of the the total indemnification and repurchase liability for estimated losses on indemnification and repurchase claims \\n |
Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: entergy corporation and subsidiaries notes to financial statements ( a ) consists of pollution control revenue bonds and environmental revenue bonds . ( b ) the bonds are secured by a series of collateral first mortgage bonds . ( c ) in december 2005 , entergy corporation sold 10 million equity units with a stated amount of $ 50 each . an equity unit consisted of ( 1 ) a note , initially due february 2011 and initially bearing interest at an annual rate of 5.75% ( 5.75 % ) , and ( 2 ) a purchase contract that obligated the holder of the equity unit to purchase for $ 50 between 0.5705 and 0.7074 shares of entergy corporation common stock on or before february 17 , 2009 . entergy paid the holders quarterly contract adjustment payments of 1.875% ( 1.875 % ) per year on the stated amount of $ 50 per equity unit . under the terms of the purchase contracts , entergy attempted to remarket the notes in february 2009 but was unsuccessful , the note holders put the notes to entergy , entergy retired the notes , and entergy issued 6598000 shares of common stock in the settlement of the purchase contracts . ( d ) pursuant to the nuclear waste policy act of 1982 , entergy's nuclear owner/licensee subsidiaries have contracts with the doe for spent nuclear fuel disposal service . the contracts include a one-time fee for generation prior to april 7 , 1983 . entergy arkansas is the only entergy company that generated electric power with nuclear fuel prior to that date and includes the one-time fee , plus accrued interest , in long-term ( e ) the fair value excludes lease obligations , long-term doe obligations , and the note payable to nypa , and includes debt due within one year . it is determined using bid prices reported by dealer markets and by nationally recognized investment banking firms . ( f ) entergy gulf states louisiana remains primarily liable for all of the long-term debt issued by entergy gulf states , inc . that was outstanding on december 31 , 2008 and 2007 . under a debt assumption agreement with entergy gulf states louisiana , entergy texas assumed approximately 46% ( 46 % ) of this long-term debt . the annual long-term debt maturities ( excluding lease obligations ) for debt outstanding as of december 31 , 2008 , for the next five years are as follows : amount ( in thousands ) .
||amount ( in thousands )|
|2009|$ 516019|
|2010|$ 763036|
|2011|$ 897367|
|2012|$ 3625459|
|2013|$ 579461|
in november 2000 , entergy's non-utility nuclear business purchased the fitzpatrick and indian point 3 power plants in a seller-financed transaction . entergy issued notes to nypa with seven annual installments of approximately $ 108 million commencing one year from the date of the closing , and eight annual installments of $ 20 million commencing eight years from the date of the closing . these notes do not have a stated interest rate , but have an implicit interest rate of 4.8% ( 4.8 % ) . in accordance with the purchase agreement with nypa , the purchase of indian point 2 in 2001 resulted in entergy's non-utility nuclear business becoming liable to nypa for an additional $ 10 million per year for 10 years , beginning in september 2003 . this liability was recorded upon the purchase of indian point 2 in september 2001 , and is included in the note payable to nypa balance above . in july 2003 , a payment of $ 102 million was made prior to maturity on the note payable to nypa . under a provision in a letter of credit supporting these notes , if certain of the utility operating companies or system energy were to default on other indebtedness , entergy could be required to post collateral to support the letter of credit . covenants in the entergy corporation notes require it to maintain a consolidated debt ratio of 65% ( 65 % ) or less of its total capitalization . if entergy's debt ratio exceeds this limit , or if entergy or certain of the utility operating companies default on other indebtedness or are in bankruptcy or insolvency proceedings , an acceleration of the notes' maturity dates may occur . entergy gulf states louisiana , entergy louisiana , entergy mississippi , entergy texas , and system energy have received ferc long-term financing orders authorizing long-term securities issuances . entergy arkansas has .
Question: 2012 debt maturities is what percent higher than the next highest year ( 2011 ) ? | 3.04011 | ### Transformed FinQA Question Generation Instructions
#### Step 1: Analyze and Understand the Original FinQA Question
- Objective: Use the given FinQA question to generate a new, logically similar but numerically different question.
- Guidelines:
- Identify the financial concepts and quantitative reasoning in the original question.
- Determine the key variables (e.g., revenue, profit, growth rate, interest) and their relationships.
- Maintain the original question’s structure and complexity.
#### Step 2: Transform and Adapt
- Objective: Create a new FinQA-style question while modifying numerical values and conditions.
- Guidelines:
- Change financial figures, constraints, or business conditions to create a unique question.
- Ensure the transformation maintains financial realism (e.g., realistic market trends, interest rates).
- Retain the original reasoning and computational steps while introducing fresh data points.
#### Step 3: Generate the New FinQA Question
- Objective: Output an original, transformed FinQA question without providing an answer or solution.
- Guidelines:
- Ensure the new question aligns with FinQA’s format and complexity.
- Maintain clarity and well-defined financial relationships.
### Response Rule
- **Generate only the "Transformed FinQA Question" for the given example without including any answer, explanation, or solution.**
### Output Format
#### Transformed FinQA Question: [Write your transformed FinQA question here.]
----
#### Task
#### Original FinQA Question: Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: entergy corporation and subsidiaries notes to financial statements ( a ) consists of pollution control revenue bonds and environmental revenue bonds . ( b ) the bonds are secured by a series of collateral first mortgage bonds . ( c ) in december 2005 , entergy corporation sold 10 million equity units with a stated amount of $ 50 each . an equity unit consisted of ( 1 ) a note , initially due february 2011 and initially bearing interest at an annual rate of 5.75% ( 5.75 % ) , and ( 2 ) a purchase contract that obligated the holder of the equity unit to purchase for $ 50 between 0.5705 and 0.7074 shares of entergy corporation common stock on or before february 17 , 2009 . entergy paid the holders quarterly contract adjustment payments of 1.875% ( 1.875 % ) per year on the stated amount of $ 50 per equity unit . under the terms of the purchase contracts , entergy attempted to remarket the notes in february 2009 but was unsuccessful , the note holders put the notes to entergy , entergy retired the notes , and entergy issued 6598000 shares of common stock in the settlement of the purchase contracts . ( d ) pursuant to the nuclear waste policy act of 1982 , entergy's nuclear owner/licensee subsidiaries have contracts with the doe for spent nuclear fuel disposal service . the contracts include a one-time fee for generation prior to april 7 , 1983 . entergy arkansas is the only entergy company that generated electric power with nuclear fuel prior to that date and includes the one-time fee , plus accrued interest , in long-term ( e ) the fair value excludes lease obligations , long-term doe obligations , and the note payable to nypa , and includes debt due within one year . it is determined using bid prices reported by dealer markets and by nationally recognized investment banking firms . ( f ) entergy gulf states louisiana remains primarily liable for all of the long-term debt issued by entergy gulf states , inc . that was outstanding on december 31 , 2008 and 2007 . under a debt assumption agreement with entergy gulf states louisiana , entergy texas assumed approximately 46% ( 46 % ) of this long-term debt . the annual long-term debt maturities ( excluding lease obligations ) for debt outstanding as of december 31 , 2008 , for the next five years are as follows : amount ( in thousands ) .
||amount ( in thousands )|
|2009|$ 516019|
|2010|$ 763036|
|2011|$ 897367|
|2012|$ 3625459|
|2013|$ 579461|
in november 2000 , entergy's non-utility nuclear business purchased the fitzpatrick and indian point 3 power plants in a seller-financed transaction . entergy issued notes to nypa with seven annual installments of approximately $ 108 million commencing one year from the date of the closing , and eight annual installments of $ 20 million commencing eight years from the date of the closing . these notes do not have a stated interest rate , but have an implicit interest rate of 4.8% ( 4.8 % ) . in accordance with the purchase agreement with nypa , the purchase of indian point 2 in 2001 resulted in entergy's non-utility nuclear business becoming liable to nypa for an additional $ 10 million per year for 10 years , beginning in september 2003 . this liability was recorded upon the purchase of indian point 2 in september 2001 , and is included in the note payable to nypa balance above . in july 2003 , a payment of $ 102 million was made prior to maturity on the note payable to nypa . under a provision in a letter of credit supporting these notes , if certain of the utility operating companies or system energy were to default on other indebtedness , entergy could be required to post collateral to support the letter of credit . covenants in the entergy corporation notes require it to maintain a consolidated debt ratio of 65% ( 65 % ) or less of its total capitalization . if entergy's debt ratio exceeds this limit , or if entergy or certain of the utility operating companies default on other indebtedness or are in bankruptcy or insolvency proceedings , an acceleration of the notes' maturity dates may occur . entergy gulf states louisiana , entergy louisiana , entergy mississippi , entergy texas , and system energy have received ferc long-term financing orders authorizing long-term securities issuances . entergy arkansas has .
Question: 2012 debt maturities is what percent higher than the next highest year ( 2011 ) ? |
Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: notes to consolidated financial statements 2013 ( continued ) ( amounts in millions , except per share amounts ) guarantees we have guaranteed certain obligations of our subsidiaries relating principally to operating leases and credit facilities of certain subsidiaries . the amount of parent company guarantees on lease obligations was $ 410.3 and $ 385.1 as of december 31 , 2012 and 2011 , respectively , and the amount of parent company guarantees primarily relating to credit facilities was $ 283.4 and $ 327.5 as of december 31 , 2012 and 2011 , respectively . in the event of non-payment by the applicable subsidiary of the obligations covered by a guarantee , we would be obligated to pay the amounts covered by that guarantee . as of december 31 , 2012 , there were no material assets pledged as security for such parent company guarantees . contingent acquisition obligations the following table details the estimated future contingent acquisition obligations payable in cash as of december 31 .
||2013|2014|2015|2016|2017|thereafter|total|
|deferred acquisition payments|$ 26.0|$ 12.4|$ 9.7|$ 46.4|$ 18.9|$ 2.0|$ 115.4|
|redeemable noncontrolling interests and call options with affiliates1|20.5|43.8|32.9|5.7|2.2|10.6|115.7|
|total contingent acquisition payments|46.5|56.2|42.6|52.1|21.1|12.6|231.1|
|less : cash compensation expense included above|-0.7 ( 0.7 )|-0.6 ( 0.6 )|-0.8 ( 0.8 )|-0.2 ( 0.2 )|0.0|0.0|-2.3 ( 2.3 )|
|total|$ 45.8|$ 55.6|$ 41.8|$ 51.9|$ 21.1|$ 12.6|$ 228.8|
1 we have entered into certain acquisitions that contain both redeemable noncontrolling interests and call options with similar terms and conditions . we have certain redeemable noncontrolling interests that are exercisable at the discretion of the noncontrolling equity owners as of december 31 , 2012 . these estimated payments of $ 16.4 are included within the total payments expected to be made in 2013 , and will continue to be carried forward into 2014 or beyond until exercised or expired . redeemable noncontrolling interests are included in the table at current exercise price payable in cash , not at applicable redemption value in accordance with the authoritative guidance for classification and measurement of redeemable securities . the estimated amounts listed would be paid in the event of exercise at the earliest exercise date . see note 6 for further information relating to the payment structure of our acquisitions . all payments are contingent upon achieving projected operating performance targets and satisfying other conditions specified in the related agreements and are subject to revisions as the earn-out periods progress . legal matters we are involved in various legal proceedings , and subject to investigations , inspections , audits , inquiries and similar actions by governmental authorities , arising in the normal course of business . we evaluate all cases each reporting period and record liabilities for losses from legal proceedings when we determine that it is probable that the outcome in a legal proceeding will be unfavorable and the amount , or potential range , of loss can be reasonably estimated . in certain cases , we cannot reasonably estimate the potential loss because , for example , the litigation is in its early stages . while any outcome related to litigation or such governmental proceedings in which we are involved cannot be predicted with certainty , management believes that the outcome of these matters , individually and in the aggregate , will not have a material adverse effect on our financial condition , results of operations or cash flows . note 15 : recent accounting standards impairment of indefinite-lived intangible assets in july 2012 , the financial accounting standards board ( 201cfasb 201d ) issued amended guidance to simplify impairment testing of indefinite-lived intangible assets other than goodwill . the amended guidance permits an entity to first assess qualitative factors to determine whether it is 201cmore likely than not 201d that the indefinite-lived intangible asset is impaired . if , after assessing qualitative factors , an entity concludes that it is not 201cmore likely than not 201d that the indefinite-lived intangible .
Question: what is the mathematical range for tedeemable noncontrolling interests and call options with affiliates from 2013-2017? | 36.7 | ### Transformed FinQA Question Generation Instructions
#### Step 1: Analyze and Understand the Original FinQA Question
- Objective: Use the given FinQA question to generate a new, logically similar but numerically different question.
- Guidelines:
- Identify the financial concepts and quantitative reasoning in the original question.
- Determine the key variables (e.g., revenue, profit, growth rate, interest) and their relationships.
- Maintain the original question’s structure and complexity.
#### Step 2: Transform and Adapt
- Objective: Create a new FinQA-style question while modifying numerical values and conditions.
- Guidelines:
- Change financial figures, constraints, or business conditions to create a unique question.
- Ensure the transformation maintains financial realism (e.g., realistic market trends, interest rates).
- Retain the original reasoning and computational steps while introducing fresh data points.
#### Step 3: Generate the New FinQA Question
- Objective: Output an original, transformed FinQA question without providing an answer or solution.
- Guidelines:
- Ensure the new question aligns with FinQA’s format and complexity.
- Maintain clarity and well-defined financial relationships.
### Response Rule
- **Generate only the "Transformed FinQA Question" for the given example without including any answer, explanation, or solution.**
### Output Format
#### Transformed FinQA Question: [Write your transformed FinQA question here.]
----
#### Task
#### Original FinQA Question: Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: notes to consolidated financial statements 2013 ( continued ) ( amounts in millions , except per share amounts ) guarantees we have guaranteed certain obligations of our subsidiaries relating principally to operating leases and credit facilities of certain subsidiaries . the amount of parent company guarantees on lease obligations was $ 410.3 and $ 385.1 as of december 31 , 2012 and 2011 , respectively , and the amount of parent company guarantees primarily relating to credit facilities was $ 283.4 and $ 327.5 as of december 31 , 2012 and 2011 , respectively . in the event of non-payment by the applicable subsidiary of the obligations covered by a guarantee , we would be obligated to pay the amounts covered by that guarantee . as of december 31 , 2012 , there were no material assets pledged as security for such parent company guarantees . contingent acquisition obligations the following table details the estimated future contingent acquisition obligations payable in cash as of december 31 .
||2013|2014|2015|2016|2017|thereafter|total|
|deferred acquisition payments|$ 26.0|$ 12.4|$ 9.7|$ 46.4|$ 18.9|$ 2.0|$ 115.4|
|redeemable noncontrolling interests and call options with affiliates1|20.5|43.8|32.9|5.7|2.2|10.6|115.7|
|total contingent acquisition payments|46.5|56.2|42.6|52.1|21.1|12.6|231.1|
|less : cash compensation expense included above|-0.7 ( 0.7 )|-0.6 ( 0.6 )|-0.8 ( 0.8 )|-0.2 ( 0.2 )|0.0|0.0|-2.3 ( 2.3 )|
|total|$ 45.8|$ 55.6|$ 41.8|$ 51.9|$ 21.1|$ 12.6|$ 228.8|
1 we have entered into certain acquisitions that contain both redeemable noncontrolling interests and call options with similar terms and conditions . we have certain redeemable noncontrolling interests that are exercisable at the discretion of the noncontrolling equity owners as of december 31 , 2012 . these estimated payments of $ 16.4 are included within the total payments expected to be made in 2013 , and will continue to be carried forward into 2014 or beyond until exercised or expired . redeemable noncontrolling interests are included in the table at current exercise price payable in cash , not at applicable redemption value in accordance with the authoritative guidance for classification and measurement of redeemable securities . the estimated amounts listed would be paid in the event of exercise at the earliest exercise date . see note 6 for further information relating to the payment structure of our acquisitions . all payments are contingent upon achieving projected operating performance targets and satisfying other conditions specified in the related agreements and are subject to revisions as the earn-out periods progress . legal matters we are involved in various legal proceedings , and subject to investigations , inspections , audits , inquiries and similar actions by governmental authorities , arising in the normal course of business . we evaluate all cases each reporting period and record liabilities for losses from legal proceedings when we determine that it is probable that the outcome in a legal proceeding will be unfavorable and the amount , or potential range , of loss can be reasonably estimated . in certain cases , we cannot reasonably estimate the potential loss because , for example , the litigation is in its early stages . while any outcome related to litigation or such governmental proceedings in which we are involved cannot be predicted with certainty , management believes that the outcome of these matters , individually and in the aggregate , will not have a material adverse effect on our financial condition , results of operations or cash flows . note 15 : recent accounting standards impairment of indefinite-lived intangible assets in july 2012 , the financial accounting standards board ( 201cfasb 201d ) issued amended guidance to simplify impairment testing of indefinite-lived intangible assets other than goodwill . the amended guidance permits an entity to first assess qualitative factors to determine whether it is 201cmore likely than not 201d that the indefinite-lived intangible asset is impaired . if , after assessing qualitative factors , an entity concludes that it is not 201cmore likely than not 201d that the indefinite-lived intangible .
Question: what is the mathematical range for tedeemable noncontrolling interests and call options with affiliates from 2013-2017? |
Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: working on the site . the company resolved five of the eight pending lawsuits arising from this matter and believes that it has adequate insurance to resolve remaining matters . the company believes that the settlement of these lawsuits will not have a material adverse effect on its consolidated financial statements . during the 2009 third quarter , in connection with an environmental site remediation action under cer- cla , international paper submitted to the epa a feasibility study for this site . the epa has indicated that it intends to select a proposed remedial action alternative from those identified in the study and present this proposal for public comment . since it is not currently possible to determine the final remedial action that will be required , the company has accrued , as of december 31 , 2009 , an estimate of the minimum costs that could be required for this site . when the remediation plan is finalized by the epa , it is possible that the remediation costs could be sig- nificantly higher than amounts currently recorded . exterior siding and roofing litigation international paper has established reserves relating to the settlement , during 1998 and 1999 , of three nationwide class action lawsuits against the com- pany and masonite corp. , a former wholly-owned subsidiary of the company . those settlements relate to ( 1 ) exterior hardboard siding installed during the 1980 2019s and 1990 2019s ( the hardboard claims ) ; ( 2 ) omniwood siding installed during the 1990 2019s ( the omniwood claims ) ; and ( 3 ) woodruf roofing installed during the 1980 2019s and 1990 2019s ( the woodruf claims ) . all hardboard claims were required to be made by january 15 , 2008 , while all omniwood and woodruf claims were required to be made by jan- uary 6 , 2009 . the following table presents an analysis of total reserve activity related to the hardboard , omniwood and woodruf settlements for the years ended december 31 , 2009 , 2008 and 2007 : in millions total .
|in millions|total|
|balance december 31 2006|$ 124|
|payments|-78 ( 78 )|
|balance december 31 2007|46|
|additional provision|82|
|payments|-87 ( 87 )|
|balance december 31 2008|41|
|payments|-38 ( 38 )|
|balance december 31 2009|$ 3|
the company believes that the aggregate reserve balance remaining at december 31 , 2009 is adequate to cover the final settlement of remaining claims . summary the company is also involved in various other inquiries , administrative proceedings and litigation relating to contracts , sales of property , intellectual property , environmental and safety matters , tax , personal injury , labor and employment and other matters , some of which allege substantial monetary damages . while any proceeding or litigation has the element of uncertainty , the company believes that the outcome of any of the lawsuits or claims that are pending or threatened , or all of them combined , will not have a material adverse effect on its consolidated financial statements . note 12 variable interest entities and preferred securities of subsidiaries variable interest entities in connection with the 2006 sale of approximately 5.6 million acres of forestlands , international paper received installment notes ( the timber notes ) total- ing approximately $ 4.8 billion . the timber notes , which do not require principal payments prior to their august 2016 maturity , are supported by irrev- ocable letters of credit obtained by the buyers of the forestlands . during the 2006 fourth quarter , interna- tional paper contributed the timber notes to newly formed entities ( the borrower entities ) in exchange for class a and class b interests in these entities . subsequently , international paper contributed its $ 200 million class a interests in the borrower enti- ties , along with approximately $ 400 million of international paper promissory notes , to other newly formed entities ( the investor entities ) in exchange for class a and class b interests in these entities , and simultaneously sold its class a interest in the investor entities to a third party investor . as a result , at december 31 , 2006 , international paper held class b interests in the borrower entities and class b interests in the investor entities valued at approx- imately $ 5.0 billion . international paper has no obligation to make any further capital contributions to these entities and did not provide financial or other support during 2009 , 2008 or 2007 that was not previously contractually required . based on an analysis of these entities under guidance that considers the potential magnitude of the variability in the structure and which party bears a majority of the gains or losses , international paper determined that it is not the primary beneficiary of these entities .
Question: based on the review of the analysis of total reserve activity related to the hardboard , omniwood and woodruf settlements for the years ended december 31 , 2009 , 2008 and 2007 what was the sum of the payments | 203.0 | ### Transformed FinQA Question Generation Instructions
#### Step 1: Analyze and Understand the Original FinQA Question
- Objective: Use the given FinQA question to generate a new, logically similar but numerically different question.
- Guidelines:
- Identify the financial concepts and quantitative reasoning in the original question.
- Determine the key variables (e.g., revenue, profit, growth rate, interest) and their relationships.
- Maintain the original question’s structure and complexity.
#### Step 2: Transform and Adapt
- Objective: Create a new FinQA-style question while modifying numerical values and conditions.
- Guidelines:
- Change financial figures, constraints, or business conditions to create a unique question.
- Ensure the transformation maintains financial realism (e.g., realistic market trends, interest rates).
- Retain the original reasoning and computational steps while introducing fresh data points.
#### Step 3: Generate the New FinQA Question
- Objective: Output an original, transformed FinQA question without providing an answer or solution.
- Guidelines:
- Ensure the new question aligns with FinQA’s format and complexity.
- Maintain clarity and well-defined financial relationships.
### Response Rule
- **Generate only the "Transformed FinQA Question" for the given example without including any answer, explanation, or solution.**
### Output Format
#### Transformed FinQA Question: [Write your transformed FinQA question here.]
----
#### Task
#### Original FinQA Question: Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: working on the site . the company resolved five of the eight pending lawsuits arising from this matter and believes that it has adequate insurance to resolve remaining matters . the company believes that the settlement of these lawsuits will not have a material adverse effect on its consolidated financial statements . during the 2009 third quarter , in connection with an environmental site remediation action under cer- cla , international paper submitted to the epa a feasibility study for this site . the epa has indicated that it intends to select a proposed remedial action alternative from those identified in the study and present this proposal for public comment . since it is not currently possible to determine the final remedial action that will be required , the company has accrued , as of december 31 , 2009 , an estimate of the minimum costs that could be required for this site . when the remediation plan is finalized by the epa , it is possible that the remediation costs could be sig- nificantly higher than amounts currently recorded . exterior siding and roofing litigation international paper has established reserves relating to the settlement , during 1998 and 1999 , of three nationwide class action lawsuits against the com- pany and masonite corp. , a former wholly-owned subsidiary of the company . those settlements relate to ( 1 ) exterior hardboard siding installed during the 1980 2019s and 1990 2019s ( the hardboard claims ) ; ( 2 ) omniwood siding installed during the 1990 2019s ( the omniwood claims ) ; and ( 3 ) woodruf roofing installed during the 1980 2019s and 1990 2019s ( the woodruf claims ) . all hardboard claims were required to be made by january 15 , 2008 , while all omniwood and woodruf claims were required to be made by jan- uary 6 , 2009 . the following table presents an analysis of total reserve activity related to the hardboard , omniwood and woodruf settlements for the years ended december 31 , 2009 , 2008 and 2007 : in millions total .
|in millions|total|
|balance december 31 2006|$ 124|
|payments|-78 ( 78 )|
|balance december 31 2007|46|
|additional provision|82|
|payments|-87 ( 87 )|
|balance december 31 2008|41|
|payments|-38 ( 38 )|
|balance december 31 2009|$ 3|
the company believes that the aggregate reserve balance remaining at december 31 , 2009 is adequate to cover the final settlement of remaining claims . summary the company is also involved in various other inquiries , administrative proceedings and litigation relating to contracts , sales of property , intellectual property , environmental and safety matters , tax , personal injury , labor and employment and other matters , some of which allege substantial monetary damages . while any proceeding or litigation has the element of uncertainty , the company believes that the outcome of any of the lawsuits or claims that are pending or threatened , or all of them combined , will not have a material adverse effect on its consolidated financial statements . note 12 variable interest entities and preferred securities of subsidiaries variable interest entities in connection with the 2006 sale of approximately 5.6 million acres of forestlands , international paper received installment notes ( the timber notes ) total- ing approximately $ 4.8 billion . the timber notes , which do not require principal payments prior to their august 2016 maturity , are supported by irrev- ocable letters of credit obtained by the buyers of the forestlands . during the 2006 fourth quarter , interna- tional paper contributed the timber notes to newly formed entities ( the borrower entities ) in exchange for class a and class b interests in these entities . subsequently , international paper contributed its $ 200 million class a interests in the borrower enti- ties , along with approximately $ 400 million of international paper promissory notes , to other newly formed entities ( the investor entities ) in exchange for class a and class b interests in these entities , and simultaneously sold its class a interest in the investor entities to a third party investor . as a result , at december 31 , 2006 , international paper held class b interests in the borrower entities and class b interests in the investor entities valued at approx- imately $ 5.0 billion . international paper has no obligation to make any further capital contributions to these entities and did not provide financial or other support during 2009 , 2008 or 2007 that was not previously contractually required . based on an analysis of these entities under guidance that considers the potential magnitude of the variability in the structure and which party bears a majority of the gains or losses , international paper determined that it is not the primary beneficiary of these entities .
Question: based on the review of the analysis of total reserve activity related to the hardboard , omniwood and woodruf settlements for the years ended december 31 , 2009 , 2008 and 2007 what was the sum of the payments |
Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: distribution xpedx , our north american merchant distribution business , distributes products and services to a number of customer markets including : commercial printers with printing papers and graphic pre-press , printing presses and post-press equipment ; building services and away-from-home markets with facility supplies ; manufacturers with packaging supplies and equipment ; and to a growing number of customers , we exclusively provide distribution capabilities including warehousing and delivery services . xpedx is the leading wholesale distribution marketer in these customer and product segments in north america , operating 122 warehouse locations and 130 retail stores in the united states , mexico and cana- forest products international paper owns and manages approx- imately 200000 acres of forestlands and develop- ment properties in the united states , mostly in the south . our remaining forestlands are managed as a portfolio to optimize the economic value to our shareholders . most of our portfolio represents prop- erties that are likely to be sold to investors and other buyers for various purposes . specialty businesses and other chemicals : this business was sold in the first quarter of 2007 . ilim holding s.a . in october 2007 , international paper and ilim holding s.a . ( ilim ) completed a 50:50 joint venture to operate a pulp and paper business located in russia . ilim 2019s facilities include three paper mills located in bratsk , ust-ilimsk , and koryazhma , russia , with combined total pulp and paper capacity of over 2.5 million tons . ilim has exclusive harvesting rights on timberland and forest areas exceeding 12.8 million acres ( 5.2 million hectares ) . products and brand designations appearing in italics are trademarks of international paper or a related company . industry segment results industrial packaging demand for industrial packaging products is closely correlated with non-durable industrial goods pro- duction , as well as with demand for processed foods , poultry , meat and agricultural products . in addition to prices and volumes , major factors affecting the profitability of industrial packaging are raw material and energy costs , freight costs , manufacturing effi- ciency and product mix . industrial packaging results for 2009 and 2008 include the cbpr business acquired in the 2008 third quarter . net sales for 2009 increased 16% ( 16 % ) to $ 8.9 billion compared with $ 7.7 billion in 2008 , and 69% ( 69 % ) compared with $ 5.2 billion in 2007 . operating profits were 95% ( 95 % ) higher in 2009 than in 2008 and more than double 2007 levels . benefits from higher total year-over-year shipments , including the impact of the cbpr business , ( $ 11 million ) , favorable operating costs ( $ 294 million ) , and lower raw material and freight costs ( $ 295 million ) were parti- ally offset by the effects of lower price realizations ( $ 243 million ) , higher corporate overhead allocations ( $ 85 million ) , incremental integration costs asso- ciated with the acquisition of the cbpr business ( $ 3 million ) and higher other costs ( $ 7 million ) . additionally , operating profits in 2009 included a gain of $ 849 million relating to alternative fuel mix- ture credits , u.s . plant closure costs of $ 653 million , and costs associated with the shutdown of the eti- enne mill in france of $ 87 million . industrial packaging in millions 2009 2008 2007 .
|in millions|2009|2008|2007|
|sales|$ 8890|$ 7690|$ 5245|
|operating profit|761|390|374|
north american industrial packaging results include the net sales and operating profits of the cbpr business from the august 4 , 2008 acquis- ition date . net sales were $ 7.6 billion in 2009 com- pared with $ 6.2 billion in 2008 and $ 3.9 billion in 2007 . operating profits in 2009 were $ 791 million ( $ 682 million excluding alternative fuel mixture cred- its , mill closure costs and costs associated with the cbpr integration ) compared with $ 322 million ( $ 414 million excluding charges related to the write-up of cbpr inventory to fair value , cbpr integration costs and other facility closure costs ) in 2008 and $ 305 million in 2007 . excluding the effect of the cbpr acquisition , con- tainerboard and box shipments were lower in 2009 compared with 2008 reflecting weaker customer demand . average sales price realizations were sig- nificantly lower for both containerboard and boxes due to weaker world-wide economic conditions . however , average sales margins for boxes .
Question: what was the increase in industrial packaging sales between 2007 and 2008? | 2445.0 | ### Transformed FinQA Question Generation Instructions
#### Step 1: Analyze and Understand the Original FinQA Question
- Objective: Use the given FinQA question to generate a new, logically similar but numerically different question.
- Guidelines:
- Identify the financial concepts and quantitative reasoning in the original question.
- Determine the key variables (e.g., revenue, profit, growth rate, interest) and their relationships.
- Maintain the original question’s structure and complexity.
#### Step 2: Transform and Adapt
- Objective: Create a new FinQA-style question while modifying numerical values and conditions.
- Guidelines:
- Change financial figures, constraints, or business conditions to create a unique question.
- Ensure the transformation maintains financial realism (e.g., realistic market trends, interest rates).
- Retain the original reasoning and computational steps while introducing fresh data points.
#### Step 3: Generate the New FinQA Question
- Objective: Output an original, transformed FinQA question without providing an answer or solution.
- Guidelines:
- Ensure the new question aligns with FinQA’s format and complexity.
- Maintain clarity and well-defined financial relationships.
### Response Rule
- **Generate only the "Transformed FinQA Question" for the given example without including any answer, explanation, or solution.**
### Output Format
#### Transformed FinQA Question: [Write your transformed FinQA question here.]
----
#### Task
#### Original FinQA Question: Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: distribution xpedx , our north american merchant distribution business , distributes products and services to a number of customer markets including : commercial printers with printing papers and graphic pre-press , printing presses and post-press equipment ; building services and away-from-home markets with facility supplies ; manufacturers with packaging supplies and equipment ; and to a growing number of customers , we exclusively provide distribution capabilities including warehousing and delivery services . xpedx is the leading wholesale distribution marketer in these customer and product segments in north america , operating 122 warehouse locations and 130 retail stores in the united states , mexico and cana- forest products international paper owns and manages approx- imately 200000 acres of forestlands and develop- ment properties in the united states , mostly in the south . our remaining forestlands are managed as a portfolio to optimize the economic value to our shareholders . most of our portfolio represents prop- erties that are likely to be sold to investors and other buyers for various purposes . specialty businesses and other chemicals : this business was sold in the first quarter of 2007 . ilim holding s.a . in october 2007 , international paper and ilim holding s.a . ( ilim ) completed a 50:50 joint venture to operate a pulp and paper business located in russia . ilim 2019s facilities include three paper mills located in bratsk , ust-ilimsk , and koryazhma , russia , with combined total pulp and paper capacity of over 2.5 million tons . ilim has exclusive harvesting rights on timberland and forest areas exceeding 12.8 million acres ( 5.2 million hectares ) . products and brand designations appearing in italics are trademarks of international paper or a related company . industry segment results industrial packaging demand for industrial packaging products is closely correlated with non-durable industrial goods pro- duction , as well as with demand for processed foods , poultry , meat and agricultural products . in addition to prices and volumes , major factors affecting the profitability of industrial packaging are raw material and energy costs , freight costs , manufacturing effi- ciency and product mix . industrial packaging results for 2009 and 2008 include the cbpr business acquired in the 2008 third quarter . net sales for 2009 increased 16% ( 16 % ) to $ 8.9 billion compared with $ 7.7 billion in 2008 , and 69% ( 69 % ) compared with $ 5.2 billion in 2007 . operating profits were 95% ( 95 % ) higher in 2009 than in 2008 and more than double 2007 levels . benefits from higher total year-over-year shipments , including the impact of the cbpr business , ( $ 11 million ) , favorable operating costs ( $ 294 million ) , and lower raw material and freight costs ( $ 295 million ) were parti- ally offset by the effects of lower price realizations ( $ 243 million ) , higher corporate overhead allocations ( $ 85 million ) , incremental integration costs asso- ciated with the acquisition of the cbpr business ( $ 3 million ) and higher other costs ( $ 7 million ) . additionally , operating profits in 2009 included a gain of $ 849 million relating to alternative fuel mix- ture credits , u.s . plant closure costs of $ 653 million , and costs associated with the shutdown of the eti- enne mill in france of $ 87 million . industrial packaging in millions 2009 2008 2007 .
|in millions|2009|2008|2007|
|sales|$ 8890|$ 7690|$ 5245|
|operating profit|761|390|374|
north american industrial packaging results include the net sales and operating profits of the cbpr business from the august 4 , 2008 acquis- ition date . net sales were $ 7.6 billion in 2009 com- pared with $ 6.2 billion in 2008 and $ 3.9 billion in 2007 . operating profits in 2009 were $ 791 million ( $ 682 million excluding alternative fuel mixture cred- its , mill closure costs and costs associated with the cbpr integration ) compared with $ 322 million ( $ 414 million excluding charges related to the write-up of cbpr inventory to fair value , cbpr integration costs and other facility closure costs ) in 2008 and $ 305 million in 2007 . excluding the effect of the cbpr acquisition , con- tainerboard and box shipments were lower in 2009 compared with 2008 reflecting weaker customer demand . average sales price realizations were sig- nificantly lower for both containerboard and boxes due to weaker world-wide economic conditions . however , average sales margins for boxes .
Question: what was the increase in industrial packaging sales between 2007 and 2008? |
Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: entergy louisiana , llc and subsidiaries management 2019s financial discussion and analysis entergy louisiana may refinance , redeem , or otherwise retire debt prior to maturity , to the extent market conditions and interest and distribution rates are favorable . all debt and common and preferred membership interest issuances by entergy louisiana require prior regulatory approval . preferred membership interest and debt issuances are also subject to issuance tests set forth in its bond indentures and other agreements . entergy louisiana has sufficient capacity under these tests to meet its foreseeable capital needs . entergy louisiana 2019s receivables from the money pool were as follows as of december 31 for each of the following years. .
|2016|2015|2014|2013|
|( in thousands )|( in thousands )|( in thousands )|( in thousands )|
|$ 22503|$ 6154|$ 2815|$ 19573|
see note 4 to the financial statements for a description of the money pool . entergy louisiana has a credit facility in the amount of $ 350 million scheduled to expire in august 2021 . the credit facility allows entergy louisiana to issue letters of credit against 50% ( 50 % ) of the borrowing capacity of the facility . as of december 31 , 2016 , there were no cash borrowings and a $ 6.4 million letter of credit outstanding under the credit facility . in addition , entergy louisiana is party to an uncommitted letter of credit facility as a means to post collateral to support its obligations under miso . as of december 31 , 2016 , a $ 5.7 million letter of credit was outstanding under entergy louisiana 2019s uncommitted letter of credit facility . see note 4 to the financial statements for additional discussion of the credit facilities . the entergy louisiana nuclear fuel company variable interest entities have two separate credit facilities , one in the amount of $ 105 million and one in the amount of $ 85 million , both scheduled to expire in may 2019 . as of december 31 , 2016 , $ 3.8 million of letters of credit were outstanding under the credit facility to support a like amount of commercial paper issued by the entergy louisiana waterford 3 nuclear fuel company variable interest entity and there were no cash borrowings outstanding under the credit facility for the entergy louisiana river bend nuclear fuel company variable interest entity . see note 4 to the financial statements for additional discussion of the nuclear fuel company variable interest entity credit facility . entergy louisiana obtained authorizations from the ferc through october 2017 for the following : 2022 short-term borrowings not to exceed an aggregate amount of $ 450 million at any time outstanding ; 2022 long-term borrowings and security issuances ; and 2022 long-term borrowings by its nuclear fuel company variable interest entities . see note 4 to the financial statements for further discussion of entergy louisiana 2019s short-term borrowing limits . hurricane isaac in june 2014 the lpsc voted to approve a series of orders which ( i ) quantified $ 290.8 million of hurricane isaac system restoration costs as prudently incurred ; ( ii ) determined $ 290 million as the level of storm reserves to be re-established ; ( iii ) authorized entergy louisiana to utilize louisiana act 55 financing for hurricane isaac system restoration costs ; and ( iv ) granted other requested relief associated with storm reserves and act 55 financing of hurricane isaac system restoration costs . entergy louisiana committed to pass on to customers a minimum of $ 30.8 million of customer benefits through annual customer credits of approximately $ 6.2 million for five years . approvals for the act 55 financings were obtained from the louisiana utilities restoration corporation and the louisiana state bond commission . see note 2 to the financial statements for a discussion of the august 2014 issuance of bonds under act 55 of the louisiana legislature. .
Question: what is the net change in entergy louisiana 2019s receivables from the money pool from 2015 to 2016? | 16349.0 | ### Transformed FinQA Question Generation Instructions
#### Step 1: Analyze and Understand the Original FinQA Question
- Objective: Use the given FinQA question to generate a new, logically similar but numerically different question.
- Guidelines:
- Identify the financial concepts and quantitative reasoning in the original question.
- Determine the key variables (e.g., revenue, profit, growth rate, interest) and their relationships.
- Maintain the original question’s structure and complexity.
#### Step 2: Transform and Adapt
- Objective: Create a new FinQA-style question while modifying numerical values and conditions.
- Guidelines:
- Change financial figures, constraints, or business conditions to create a unique question.
- Ensure the transformation maintains financial realism (e.g., realistic market trends, interest rates).
- Retain the original reasoning and computational steps while introducing fresh data points.
#### Step 3: Generate the New FinQA Question
- Objective: Output an original, transformed FinQA question without providing an answer or solution.
- Guidelines:
- Ensure the new question aligns with FinQA’s format and complexity.
- Maintain clarity and well-defined financial relationships.
### Response Rule
- **Generate only the "Transformed FinQA Question" for the given example without including any answer, explanation, or solution.**
### Output Format
#### Transformed FinQA Question: [Write your transformed FinQA question here.]
----
#### Task
#### Original FinQA Question: Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: entergy louisiana , llc and subsidiaries management 2019s financial discussion and analysis entergy louisiana may refinance , redeem , or otherwise retire debt prior to maturity , to the extent market conditions and interest and distribution rates are favorable . all debt and common and preferred membership interest issuances by entergy louisiana require prior regulatory approval . preferred membership interest and debt issuances are also subject to issuance tests set forth in its bond indentures and other agreements . entergy louisiana has sufficient capacity under these tests to meet its foreseeable capital needs . entergy louisiana 2019s receivables from the money pool were as follows as of december 31 for each of the following years. .
|2016|2015|2014|2013|
|( in thousands )|( in thousands )|( in thousands )|( in thousands )|
|$ 22503|$ 6154|$ 2815|$ 19573|
see note 4 to the financial statements for a description of the money pool . entergy louisiana has a credit facility in the amount of $ 350 million scheduled to expire in august 2021 . the credit facility allows entergy louisiana to issue letters of credit against 50% ( 50 % ) of the borrowing capacity of the facility . as of december 31 , 2016 , there were no cash borrowings and a $ 6.4 million letter of credit outstanding under the credit facility . in addition , entergy louisiana is party to an uncommitted letter of credit facility as a means to post collateral to support its obligations under miso . as of december 31 , 2016 , a $ 5.7 million letter of credit was outstanding under entergy louisiana 2019s uncommitted letter of credit facility . see note 4 to the financial statements for additional discussion of the credit facilities . the entergy louisiana nuclear fuel company variable interest entities have two separate credit facilities , one in the amount of $ 105 million and one in the amount of $ 85 million , both scheduled to expire in may 2019 . as of december 31 , 2016 , $ 3.8 million of letters of credit were outstanding under the credit facility to support a like amount of commercial paper issued by the entergy louisiana waterford 3 nuclear fuel company variable interest entity and there were no cash borrowings outstanding under the credit facility for the entergy louisiana river bend nuclear fuel company variable interest entity . see note 4 to the financial statements for additional discussion of the nuclear fuel company variable interest entity credit facility . entergy louisiana obtained authorizations from the ferc through october 2017 for the following : 2022 short-term borrowings not to exceed an aggregate amount of $ 450 million at any time outstanding ; 2022 long-term borrowings and security issuances ; and 2022 long-term borrowings by its nuclear fuel company variable interest entities . see note 4 to the financial statements for further discussion of entergy louisiana 2019s short-term borrowing limits . hurricane isaac in june 2014 the lpsc voted to approve a series of orders which ( i ) quantified $ 290.8 million of hurricane isaac system restoration costs as prudently incurred ; ( ii ) determined $ 290 million as the level of storm reserves to be re-established ; ( iii ) authorized entergy louisiana to utilize louisiana act 55 financing for hurricane isaac system restoration costs ; and ( iv ) granted other requested relief associated with storm reserves and act 55 financing of hurricane isaac system restoration costs . entergy louisiana committed to pass on to customers a minimum of $ 30.8 million of customer benefits through annual customer credits of approximately $ 6.2 million for five years . approvals for the act 55 financings were obtained from the louisiana utilities restoration corporation and the louisiana state bond commission . see note 2 to the financial statements for a discussion of the august 2014 issuance of bonds under act 55 of the louisiana legislature. .
Question: what is the net change in entergy louisiana 2019s receivables from the money pool from 2015 to 2016? |
Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: december 31 , 2008 , 2007 and 2006 , included ( in millions ) : .
||2008|2007|2006|
|gain on disposition adjustment or impairment of acquired assets and obligations|$ -9.0 ( 9.0 )|$ -1.2 ( 1.2 )|$ -19.2 ( 19.2 )|
|consulting and professional fees|10.1|1.0|8.8|
|employee severance and retention|1.9|1.6|3.3|
|information technology integration|0.9|2.6|3.0|
|in-process research & development|38.5|6.5|2.9|
|integration personnel|2013|2013|2.5|
|facility and employee relocation|7.5|2013|1.0|
|distributor acquisitions|7.3|4.1|2013|
|sales agent and lease contract terminations|8.1|5.4|0.2|
|other|3.2|5.2|3.6|
|acquisition integration and other|$ 68.5|$ 25.2|$ 6.1|
included in the gain on disposition , adjustment or impairment of acquired assets and obligations for 2008 is a favorable adjustment to certain liabilities of acquired companies due to changes in circumstances surrounding those liabilities subsequent to the related measurement period . included in the gain on disposition , adjustment or impairment of acquired assets and obligations for 2006 is the sale of the former centerpulse austin land and facilities for a gain of $ 5.1 million and the favorable settlement of two pre- acquisition contingent liabilities . these gains were offset by a $ 13.4 million impairment charge for certain centerpulse tradename and trademark intangibles based principally in our europe operating segment . in-process research and development charges for 2008 are related to the acquisition of abbott spine . in-process research and development charges for 2007 are related to the acquisitions of endius and orthosoft . consulting and professional fees relate to third- party integration consulting performed in a variety of areas such as tax , compliance , logistics and human resources and legal fees related to matters involving acquired businesses . cash and equivalents 2013 we consider all highly liquid investments with an original maturity of three months or less to be cash equivalents . the carrying amounts reported in the balance sheet for cash and equivalents are valued at cost , which approximates their fair value . restricted cash is primarily composed of cash held in escrow related to certain insurance coverage . inventories 2013 inventories , net of allowances for obsolete and slow-moving goods , are stated at the lower of cost or market , with cost determined on a first-in first-out basis . property , plant and equipment 2013 property , plant and equipment is carried at cost less accumulated depreciation . depreciation is computed using the straight-line method based on estimated useful lives of ten to forty years for buildings and improvements , three to eight years for machinery and equipment . maintenance and repairs are expensed as incurred . in accordance with statement of financial accounting standards ( 201csfas 201d ) no . 144 , 201caccounting for the impairment or disposal of long-lived assets , 201d we review property , plant and equipment for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value of an asset may not be recoverable . an impairment loss would be recognized when estimated future undiscounted cash flows relating to the asset are less than its carrying amount . an impairment loss is measured as the amount by which the carrying amount of an asset exceeds its fair value . software costs 2013 we capitalize certain computer software and software development costs incurred in connection with developing or obtaining computer software for internal use when both the preliminary project stage is completed and it is probable that the software will be used as intended . capitalized software costs generally include external direct costs of materials and services utilized in developing or obtaining computer software and compensation and related benefits for employees who are directly associated with the software project . capitalized software costs are included in property , plant and equipment on our balance sheet and amortized on a straight-line basis when the software is ready for its intended use over the estimated useful lives of the software , which approximate three to seven years . instruments 2013 instruments are hand-held devices used by orthopaedic surgeons during total joint replacement and other surgical procedures . instruments are recognized as long-lived assets and are included in property , plant and equipment . undeployed instruments are carried at cost , net of allowances for excess and obsolete instruments . instruments in the field are carried at cost less accumulated depreciation . depreciation is computed using the straight-line method based on average estimated useful lives , determined principally in reference to associated product life cycles , primarily five years . we review instruments for impairment in accordance with sfas no . 144 . depreciation of instruments is recognized as selling , general and administrative expense . goodwill 2013 we account for goodwill in accordance with sfas no . 142 , 201cgoodwill and other intangible assets . 201d goodwill is not amortized but is subject to annual impairment tests . goodwill has been assigned to reporting units . we perform annual impairment tests by comparing each reporting unit 2019s fair value to its carrying amount to determine if there is potential impairment . the fair value of the reporting unit and the implied fair value of goodwill are determined based upon a discounted cash flow analysis . significant assumptions are incorporated into to these discounted cash flow analyses such as estimated growth rates and risk-adjusted discount rates . we perform this test in the fourth quarter of the year . if the fair value of the reporting unit is less than its carrying value , an impairment loss is recorded to the extent that the implied fair value of the reporting unit goodwill is less than the carrying value of the reporting unit goodwill . intangible assets 2013 we account for intangible assets in accordance with sfas no . 142 . intangible assets are initially measured at their fair value . we have determined the fair value of our intangible assets either by the fair value of the z i m m e r h o l d i n g s , i n c . 2 0 0 8 f o r m 1 0 - k a n n u a l r e p o r t notes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) %%transmsg*** transmitting job : c48761 pcn : 044000000 ***%%pcmsg|44 |00007|yes|no|02/24/2009 06:10|0|0|page is valid , no graphics -- color : d| .
Question: what is the percent change in information technology integration from 2006 to 2007? | 0.15385 | ### Transformed FinQA Question Generation Instructions
#### Step 1: Analyze and Understand the Original FinQA Question
- Objective: Use the given FinQA question to generate a new, logically similar but numerically different question.
- Guidelines:
- Identify the financial concepts and quantitative reasoning in the original question.
- Determine the key variables (e.g., revenue, profit, growth rate, interest) and their relationships.
- Maintain the original question’s structure and complexity.
#### Step 2: Transform and Adapt
- Objective: Create a new FinQA-style question while modifying numerical values and conditions.
- Guidelines:
- Change financial figures, constraints, or business conditions to create a unique question.
- Ensure the transformation maintains financial realism (e.g., realistic market trends, interest rates).
- Retain the original reasoning and computational steps while introducing fresh data points.
#### Step 3: Generate the New FinQA Question
- Objective: Output an original, transformed FinQA question without providing an answer or solution.
- Guidelines:
- Ensure the new question aligns with FinQA’s format and complexity.
- Maintain clarity and well-defined financial relationships.
### Response Rule
- **Generate only the "Transformed FinQA Question" for the given example without including any answer, explanation, or solution.**
### Output Format
#### Transformed FinQA Question: [Write your transformed FinQA question here.]
----
#### Task
#### Original FinQA Question: Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: december 31 , 2008 , 2007 and 2006 , included ( in millions ) : .
||2008|2007|2006|
|gain on disposition adjustment or impairment of acquired assets and obligations|$ -9.0 ( 9.0 )|$ -1.2 ( 1.2 )|$ -19.2 ( 19.2 )|
|consulting and professional fees|10.1|1.0|8.8|
|employee severance and retention|1.9|1.6|3.3|
|information technology integration|0.9|2.6|3.0|
|in-process research & development|38.5|6.5|2.9|
|integration personnel|2013|2013|2.5|
|facility and employee relocation|7.5|2013|1.0|
|distributor acquisitions|7.3|4.1|2013|
|sales agent and lease contract terminations|8.1|5.4|0.2|
|other|3.2|5.2|3.6|
|acquisition integration and other|$ 68.5|$ 25.2|$ 6.1|
included in the gain on disposition , adjustment or impairment of acquired assets and obligations for 2008 is a favorable adjustment to certain liabilities of acquired companies due to changes in circumstances surrounding those liabilities subsequent to the related measurement period . included in the gain on disposition , adjustment or impairment of acquired assets and obligations for 2006 is the sale of the former centerpulse austin land and facilities for a gain of $ 5.1 million and the favorable settlement of two pre- acquisition contingent liabilities . these gains were offset by a $ 13.4 million impairment charge for certain centerpulse tradename and trademark intangibles based principally in our europe operating segment . in-process research and development charges for 2008 are related to the acquisition of abbott spine . in-process research and development charges for 2007 are related to the acquisitions of endius and orthosoft . consulting and professional fees relate to third- party integration consulting performed in a variety of areas such as tax , compliance , logistics and human resources and legal fees related to matters involving acquired businesses . cash and equivalents 2013 we consider all highly liquid investments with an original maturity of three months or less to be cash equivalents . the carrying amounts reported in the balance sheet for cash and equivalents are valued at cost , which approximates their fair value . restricted cash is primarily composed of cash held in escrow related to certain insurance coverage . inventories 2013 inventories , net of allowances for obsolete and slow-moving goods , are stated at the lower of cost or market , with cost determined on a first-in first-out basis . property , plant and equipment 2013 property , plant and equipment is carried at cost less accumulated depreciation . depreciation is computed using the straight-line method based on estimated useful lives of ten to forty years for buildings and improvements , three to eight years for machinery and equipment . maintenance and repairs are expensed as incurred . in accordance with statement of financial accounting standards ( 201csfas 201d ) no . 144 , 201caccounting for the impairment or disposal of long-lived assets , 201d we review property , plant and equipment for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value of an asset may not be recoverable . an impairment loss would be recognized when estimated future undiscounted cash flows relating to the asset are less than its carrying amount . an impairment loss is measured as the amount by which the carrying amount of an asset exceeds its fair value . software costs 2013 we capitalize certain computer software and software development costs incurred in connection with developing or obtaining computer software for internal use when both the preliminary project stage is completed and it is probable that the software will be used as intended . capitalized software costs generally include external direct costs of materials and services utilized in developing or obtaining computer software and compensation and related benefits for employees who are directly associated with the software project . capitalized software costs are included in property , plant and equipment on our balance sheet and amortized on a straight-line basis when the software is ready for its intended use over the estimated useful lives of the software , which approximate three to seven years . instruments 2013 instruments are hand-held devices used by orthopaedic surgeons during total joint replacement and other surgical procedures . instruments are recognized as long-lived assets and are included in property , plant and equipment . undeployed instruments are carried at cost , net of allowances for excess and obsolete instruments . instruments in the field are carried at cost less accumulated depreciation . depreciation is computed using the straight-line method based on average estimated useful lives , determined principally in reference to associated product life cycles , primarily five years . we review instruments for impairment in accordance with sfas no . 144 . depreciation of instruments is recognized as selling , general and administrative expense . goodwill 2013 we account for goodwill in accordance with sfas no . 142 , 201cgoodwill and other intangible assets . 201d goodwill is not amortized but is subject to annual impairment tests . goodwill has been assigned to reporting units . we perform annual impairment tests by comparing each reporting unit 2019s fair value to its carrying amount to determine if there is potential impairment . the fair value of the reporting unit and the implied fair value of goodwill are determined based upon a discounted cash flow analysis . significant assumptions are incorporated into to these discounted cash flow analyses such as estimated growth rates and risk-adjusted discount rates . we perform this test in the fourth quarter of the year . if the fair value of the reporting unit is less than its carrying value , an impairment loss is recorded to the extent that the implied fair value of the reporting unit goodwill is less than the carrying value of the reporting unit goodwill . intangible assets 2013 we account for intangible assets in accordance with sfas no . 142 . intangible assets are initially measured at their fair value . we have determined the fair value of our intangible assets either by the fair value of the z i m m e r h o l d i n g s , i n c . 2 0 0 8 f o r m 1 0 - k a n n u a l r e p o r t notes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) %%transmsg*** transmitting job : c48761 pcn : 044000000 ***%%pcmsg|44 |00007|yes|no|02/24/2009 06:10|0|0|page is valid , no graphics -- color : d| .
Question: what is the percent change in information technology integration from 2006 to 2007? |
Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: obligations of non-consolidated affiliates , mainly cpw . in addition , off-balance sheet arrangements are generally limited to the future payments under non-cancelable operating leases , which totaled $ 559 million as of may 27 , as of may 27 , 2018 , we had invested in five variable interest entities ( vies ) . none of our vies are material to our results of operations , financial condition , or liquidity as of and for the fiscal year ended may 27 , 2018 . our defined benefit plans in the united states are subject to the requirements of the pension protection act ( ppa ) . in the future , the ppa may require us to make additional contributions to our domestic plans . we do not expect to be required to make any contributions in fiscal 2019 . the following table summarizes our future estimated cash payments under existing contractual obligations , including payments due by period: .
|in millions|payments due by fiscal year total|payments due by fiscal year 2019|payments due by fiscal year 2020 -21|payments due by fiscal year 2022 -23|payments due by fiscal year 2024 and thereafter|
|long-term debt ( a )|$ 14354.0|$ 1599.8|$ 3122.6|$ 2315.5|$ 7316.1|
|accrued interest|107.7|107.7|-|-|-|
|operating leases ( b )|559.3|137.4|208.0|122.7|91.2|
|capital leases|0.5|0.3|0.2|-|-|
|purchase obligations ( c )|3417.0|2646.9|728.8|39.8|1.5|
|total contractual obligations|18438.5|4492.1|4059.6|2478.0|7408.8|
|other long-term obligations ( d )|1199.0|-|-|-|-|
|total long-term obligations|$ 19637.5|$ 4492.1|$ 4059.6|$ 2478.0|$ 7408.8|
( a ) amounts represent the expected cash payments of our long-term debt and do not include $ 0.5 million for capital leases or $ 85.7 million for net unamortized debt issuance costs , premiums and discounts , and fair value adjustments . ( b ) operating leases represents the minimum rental commitments under non-cancelable operating leases . ( c ) the majority of the purchase obligations represent commitments for raw material and packaging to be utilized in the normal course of business and for consumer marketing spending commitments that support our brands . for purposes of this table , arrangements are considered purchase obligations if a contract specifies all significant terms , including fixed or minimum quantities to be purchased , a pricing structure , and approximate timing of the transaction . most arrangements are cancelable without a significant penalty and with short notice ( usually 30 days ) . any amounts reflected on the consolidated balance sheets as accounts payable and accrued liabilities are excluded from the table above . ( d ) the fair value of our foreign exchange , equity , commodity , and grain derivative contracts with a payable position to the counterparty was $ 16 million as of may 27 , 2018 , based on fair market values as of that date . future changes in market values will impact the amount of cash ultimately paid or received to settle those instruments in the future . other long-term obligations mainly consist of liabilities for accrued compensation and benefits , including the underfunded status of certain of our defined benefit pension , other postretirement benefit , and postemployment benefit plans , and miscellaneous liabilities . we expect to pay $ 20 million of benefits from our unfunded postemployment benefit plans and $ 18 million of deferred compensation in fiscal 2019 . we are unable to reliably estimate the amount of these payments beyond fiscal 2019 . as of may 27 , 2018 , our total liability for uncertain tax positions and accrued interest and penalties was $ 223.6 million . significant accounting estimates for a complete description of our significant accounting policies , please see note 2 to the consolidated financial statements in item 8 of this report . our significant accounting estimates are those that have a meaningful impact .
Question: what portion of the total long-term obligations are due by the fiscal year 2019? | 0.22875 | ### Transformed FinQA Question Generation Instructions
#### Step 1: Analyze and Understand the Original FinQA Question
- Objective: Use the given FinQA question to generate a new, logically similar but numerically different question.
- Guidelines:
- Identify the financial concepts and quantitative reasoning in the original question.
- Determine the key variables (e.g., revenue, profit, growth rate, interest) and their relationships.
- Maintain the original question’s structure and complexity.
#### Step 2: Transform and Adapt
- Objective: Create a new FinQA-style question while modifying numerical values and conditions.
- Guidelines:
- Change financial figures, constraints, or business conditions to create a unique question.
- Ensure the transformation maintains financial realism (e.g., realistic market trends, interest rates).
- Retain the original reasoning and computational steps while introducing fresh data points.
#### Step 3: Generate the New FinQA Question
- Objective: Output an original, transformed FinQA question without providing an answer or solution.
- Guidelines:
- Ensure the new question aligns with FinQA’s format and complexity.
- Maintain clarity and well-defined financial relationships.
### Response Rule
- **Generate only the "Transformed FinQA Question" for the given example without including any answer, explanation, or solution.**
### Output Format
#### Transformed FinQA Question: [Write your transformed FinQA question here.]
----
#### Task
#### Original FinQA Question: Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: obligations of non-consolidated affiliates , mainly cpw . in addition , off-balance sheet arrangements are generally limited to the future payments under non-cancelable operating leases , which totaled $ 559 million as of may 27 , as of may 27 , 2018 , we had invested in five variable interest entities ( vies ) . none of our vies are material to our results of operations , financial condition , or liquidity as of and for the fiscal year ended may 27 , 2018 . our defined benefit plans in the united states are subject to the requirements of the pension protection act ( ppa ) . in the future , the ppa may require us to make additional contributions to our domestic plans . we do not expect to be required to make any contributions in fiscal 2019 . the following table summarizes our future estimated cash payments under existing contractual obligations , including payments due by period: .
|in millions|payments due by fiscal year total|payments due by fiscal year 2019|payments due by fiscal year 2020 -21|payments due by fiscal year 2022 -23|payments due by fiscal year 2024 and thereafter|
|long-term debt ( a )|$ 14354.0|$ 1599.8|$ 3122.6|$ 2315.5|$ 7316.1|
|accrued interest|107.7|107.7|-|-|-|
|operating leases ( b )|559.3|137.4|208.0|122.7|91.2|
|capital leases|0.5|0.3|0.2|-|-|
|purchase obligations ( c )|3417.0|2646.9|728.8|39.8|1.5|
|total contractual obligations|18438.5|4492.1|4059.6|2478.0|7408.8|
|other long-term obligations ( d )|1199.0|-|-|-|-|
|total long-term obligations|$ 19637.5|$ 4492.1|$ 4059.6|$ 2478.0|$ 7408.8|
( a ) amounts represent the expected cash payments of our long-term debt and do not include $ 0.5 million for capital leases or $ 85.7 million for net unamortized debt issuance costs , premiums and discounts , and fair value adjustments . ( b ) operating leases represents the minimum rental commitments under non-cancelable operating leases . ( c ) the majority of the purchase obligations represent commitments for raw material and packaging to be utilized in the normal course of business and for consumer marketing spending commitments that support our brands . for purposes of this table , arrangements are considered purchase obligations if a contract specifies all significant terms , including fixed or minimum quantities to be purchased , a pricing structure , and approximate timing of the transaction . most arrangements are cancelable without a significant penalty and with short notice ( usually 30 days ) . any amounts reflected on the consolidated balance sheets as accounts payable and accrued liabilities are excluded from the table above . ( d ) the fair value of our foreign exchange , equity , commodity , and grain derivative contracts with a payable position to the counterparty was $ 16 million as of may 27 , 2018 , based on fair market values as of that date . future changes in market values will impact the amount of cash ultimately paid or received to settle those instruments in the future . other long-term obligations mainly consist of liabilities for accrued compensation and benefits , including the underfunded status of certain of our defined benefit pension , other postretirement benefit , and postemployment benefit plans , and miscellaneous liabilities . we expect to pay $ 20 million of benefits from our unfunded postemployment benefit plans and $ 18 million of deferred compensation in fiscal 2019 . we are unable to reliably estimate the amount of these payments beyond fiscal 2019 . as of may 27 , 2018 , our total liability for uncertain tax positions and accrued interest and penalties was $ 223.6 million . significant accounting estimates for a complete description of our significant accounting policies , please see note 2 to the consolidated financial statements in item 8 of this report . our significant accounting estimates are those that have a meaningful impact .
Question: what portion of the total long-term obligations are due by the fiscal year 2019? |
Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: the discount rate used to measure pension obligations is determined by comparing the expected future benefits that will be paid under the plan with yields available on high quality corporate bonds of similar duration . the impact on pension expense of a .5% ( .5 % ) decrease in discount rate in the current environment is an increase of $ 18 million per year . this sensitivity depends on the economic environment and amount of unrecognized actuarial gains or losses on the measurement date . the expected long-term return on assets assumption also has a significant effect on pension expense . the expected return on plan assets is a long-term assumption established by considering historical and anticipated returns of the asset classes invested in by the pension plan and the asset allocation policy currently in place . for purposes of setting and reviewing this assumption , 201clong term 201d refers to the period over which the plan 2019s projected benefit obligations will be disbursed . we review this assumption at each measurement date and adjust it if warranted . our selection process references certain historical data and the current environment , but primarily utilizes qualitative judgment regarding future return expectations . to evaluate the continued reasonableness of our assumption , we examine a variety of viewpoints and data . various studies have shown that portfolios comprised primarily of u.s . equity securities have historically returned approximately 9% ( 9 % ) annually over long periods of time , while u.s . debt securities have returned approximately 6% ( 6 % ) annually over long periods . application of these historical returns to the plan 2019s allocation ranges for equities and bonds produces a result between 6.50% ( 6.50 % ) and 7.25% ( 7.25 % ) and is one point of reference , among many other factors , that is taken into consideration . we also examine the plan 2019s actual historical returns over various periods and consider the current economic environment . recent experience is considered in our evaluation with appropriate consideration that , especially for short time periods , recent returns are not reliable indicators of future returns . while annual returns can vary significantly ( actual returns for 2014 , 2013 and 2012 were +6.50% ( +6.50 % ) , +15.48% ( +15.48 % ) , and +15.29% ( +15.29 % ) , respectively ) , the selected assumption represents our estimated long-term average prospective returns . acknowledging the potentially wide range for this assumption , we also annually examine the assumption used by other companies with similar pension investment strategies , so that we can ascertain whether our determinations markedly differ from others . in all cases , however , this data simply informs our process , which places the greatest emphasis on our qualitative judgment of future investment returns , given the conditions existing at each annual measurement date . taking into consideration all of these factors , the expected long-term return on plan assets for determining net periodic pension cost for 2014 was 7.00% ( 7.00 % ) , down from 7.50% ( 7.50 % ) for 2013 . after considering the views of both internal and external capital market advisors , particularly with regard to the effects of the recent economic environment on long-term prospective fixed income returns , we are reducing our expected long-term return on assets to 6.75% ( 6.75 % ) for determining pension cost for under current accounting rules , the difference between expected long-term returns and actual returns is accumulated and amortized to pension expense over future periods . each one percentage point difference in actual return compared with our expected return can cause expense in subsequent years to increase or decrease by up to $ 9 million as the impact is amortized into results of operations . we currently estimate pretax pension expense of $ 9 million in 2015 compared with pretax income of $ 7 million in 2014 . this year-over-year expected increase in expense reflects the effects of the lower expected return on asset assumption , improved mortality , and the lower discount rate required to be used in 2015 . these factors will be partially offset by the favorable impact of the increase in plan assets at december 31 , 2014 and the assumed return on a $ 200 million voluntary contribution to the plan made in february 2015 . the table below reflects the estimated effects on pension expense of certain changes in annual assumptions , using 2015 estimated expense as a baseline . table 26 : pension expense 2013 sensitivity analysis change in assumption ( a ) estimated increase/ ( decrease ) to 2015 pension expense ( in millions ) .
|change in assumption ( a )|estimatedincrease/ ( decrease ) to 2015pensionexpense ( in millions )|
|.5% ( .5 % ) decrease in discount rate|$ 18|
|.5% ( .5 % ) decrease in expected long-term return on assets|$ 22|
|.5% ( .5 % ) increase in compensation rate|$ 2|
( a ) the impact is the effect of changing the specified assumption while holding all other assumptions constant . our pension plan contribution requirements are not particularly sensitive to actuarial assumptions . investment performance has the most impact on contribution requirements and will drive the amount of required contributions in future years . also , current law , including the provisions of the pension protection act of 2006 , sets limits as to both minimum and maximum contributions to the plan . notwithstanding the voluntary contribution made in february 2015 noted above , we do not expect to be required to make any contributions to the plan during 2015 . we maintain other defined benefit plans that have a less significant effect on financial results , including various nonqualified supplemental retirement plans for certain employees , which are described more fully in note 13 employee benefit plans in the notes to consolidated financial statements in item 8 of this report . 66 the pnc financial services group , inc . 2013 form 10-k .
Question: for pension expense , does a .5% ( .5 % ) decrease in discount rate have a greater impact than a .5% ( .5 % ) decrease in expected long-term return on assets? | no | ### Transformed FinQA Question Generation Instructions
#### Step 1: Analyze and Understand the Original FinQA Question
- Objective: Use the given FinQA question to generate a new, logically similar but numerically different question.
- Guidelines:
- Identify the financial concepts and quantitative reasoning in the original question.
- Determine the key variables (e.g., revenue, profit, growth rate, interest) and their relationships.
- Maintain the original question’s structure and complexity.
#### Step 2: Transform and Adapt
- Objective: Create a new FinQA-style question while modifying numerical values and conditions.
- Guidelines:
- Change financial figures, constraints, or business conditions to create a unique question.
- Ensure the transformation maintains financial realism (e.g., realistic market trends, interest rates).
- Retain the original reasoning and computational steps while introducing fresh data points.
#### Step 3: Generate the New FinQA Question
- Objective: Output an original, transformed FinQA question without providing an answer or solution.
- Guidelines:
- Ensure the new question aligns with FinQA’s format and complexity.
- Maintain clarity and well-defined financial relationships.
### Response Rule
- **Generate only the "Transformed FinQA Question" for the given example without including any answer, explanation, or solution.**
### Output Format
#### Transformed FinQA Question: [Write your transformed FinQA question here.]
----
#### Task
#### Original FinQA Question: Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: the discount rate used to measure pension obligations is determined by comparing the expected future benefits that will be paid under the plan with yields available on high quality corporate bonds of similar duration . the impact on pension expense of a .5% ( .5 % ) decrease in discount rate in the current environment is an increase of $ 18 million per year . this sensitivity depends on the economic environment and amount of unrecognized actuarial gains or losses on the measurement date . the expected long-term return on assets assumption also has a significant effect on pension expense . the expected return on plan assets is a long-term assumption established by considering historical and anticipated returns of the asset classes invested in by the pension plan and the asset allocation policy currently in place . for purposes of setting and reviewing this assumption , 201clong term 201d refers to the period over which the plan 2019s projected benefit obligations will be disbursed . we review this assumption at each measurement date and adjust it if warranted . our selection process references certain historical data and the current environment , but primarily utilizes qualitative judgment regarding future return expectations . to evaluate the continued reasonableness of our assumption , we examine a variety of viewpoints and data . various studies have shown that portfolios comprised primarily of u.s . equity securities have historically returned approximately 9% ( 9 % ) annually over long periods of time , while u.s . debt securities have returned approximately 6% ( 6 % ) annually over long periods . application of these historical returns to the plan 2019s allocation ranges for equities and bonds produces a result between 6.50% ( 6.50 % ) and 7.25% ( 7.25 % ) and is one point of reference , among many other factors , that is taken into consideration . we also examine the plan 2019s actual historical returns over various periods and consider the current economic environment . recent experience is considered in our evaluation with appropriate consideration that , especially for short time periods , recent returns are not reliable indicators of future returns . while annual returns can vary significantly ( actual returns for 2014 , 2013 and 2012 were +6.50% ( +6.50 % ) , +15.48% ( +15.48 % ) , and +15.29% ( +15.29 % ) , respectively ) , the selected assumption represents our estimated long-term average prospective returns . acknowledging the potentially wide range for this assumption , we also annually examine the assumption used by other companies with similar pension investment strategies , so that we can ascertain whether our determinations markedly differ from others . in all cases , however , this data simply informs our process , which places the greatest emphasis on our qualitative judgment of future investment returns , given the conditions existing at each annual measurement date . taking into consideration all of these factors , the expected long-term return on plan assets for determining net periodic pension cost for 2014 was 7.00% ( 7.00 % ) , down from 7.50% ( 7.50 % ) for 2013 . after considering the views of both internal and external capital market advisors , particularly with regard to the effects of the recent economic environment on long-term prospective fixed income returns , we are reducing our expected long-term return on assets to 6.75% ( 6.75 % ) for determining pension cost for under current accounting rules , the difference between expected long-term returns and actual returns is accumulated and amortized to pension expense over future periods . each one percentage point difference in actual return compared with our expected return can cause expense in subsequent years to increase or decrease by up to $ 9 million as the impact is amortized into results of operations . we currently estimate pretax pension expense of $ 9 million in 2015 compared with pretax income of $ 7 million in 2014 . this year-over-year expected increase in expense reflects the effects of the lower expected return on asset assumption , improved mortality , and the lower discount rate required to be used in 2015 . these factors will be partially offset by the favorable impact of the increase in plan assets at december 31 , 2014 and the assumed return on a $ 200 million voluntary contribution to the plan made in february 2015 . the table below reflects the estimated effects on pension expense of certain changes in annual assumptions , using 2015 estimated expense as a baseline . table 26 : pension expense 2013 sensitivity analysis change in assumption ( a ) estimated increase/ ( decrease ) to 2015 pension expense ( in millions ) .
|change in assumption ( a )|estimatedincrease/ ( decrease ) to 2015pensionexpense ( in millions )|
|.5% ( .5 % ) decrease in discount rate|$ 18|
|.5% ( .5 % ) decrease in expected long-term return on assets|$ 22|
|.5% ( .5 % ) increase in compensation rate|$ 2|
( a ) the impact is the effect of changing the specified assumption while holding all other assumptions constant . our pension plan contribution requirements are not particularly sensitive to actuarial assumptions . investment performance has the most impact on contribution requirements and will drive the amount of required contributions in future years . also , current law , including the provisions of the pension protection act of 2006 , sets limits as to both minimum and maximum contributions to the plan . notwithstanding the voluntary contribution made in february 2015 noted above , we do not expect to be required to make any contributions to the plan during 2015 . we maintain other defined benefit plans that have a less significant effect on financial results , including various nonqualified supplemental retirement plans for certain employees , which are described more fully in note 13 employee benefit plans in the notes to consolidated financial statements in item 8 of this report . 66 the pnc financial services group , inc . 2013 form 10-k .
Question: for pension expense , does a .5% ( .5 % ) decrease in discount rate have a greater impact than a .5% ( .5 % ) decrease in expected long-term return on assets? |
Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: kimco realty corporation and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements , continued investment in retail store leases the company has interests in various retail store leases relating to the anchor store premises in neighborhood and community shopping centers . these premises have been sublet to retailers who lease the stores pursuant to net lease agreements . income from the investment in these retail store leases during the years ended december 31 , 2008 , 2007 and 2006 , was approximately $ 2.7 million , $ 1.2 million and $ 1.3 million , respectively . these amounts represent sublease revenues during the years ended december 31 , 2008 , 2007 and 2006 , of approximately $ 7.1 million , $ 7.7 million and $ 8.2 million , respectively , less related expenses of $ 4.4 million , $ 5.1 million and $ 5.7 million , respectively , and an amount which , in management 2019s estimate , reasonably provides for the recovery of the investment over a period representing the expected remaining term of the retail store leases . the company 2019s future minimum revenues under the terms of all non-cancelable tenant subleases and future minimum obligations through the remaining terms of its retail store leases , assuming no new or renegotiated leases are executed for such premises , for future years are as follows ( in millions ) : 2009 , $ 5.6 and $ 3.8 ; 2010 , $ 5.4 and $ 3.7 ; 2011 , $ 4.5 and $ 3.1 ; 2012 , $ 2.3 and $ 2.1 ; 2013 , $ 1.0 and $ 1.3 and thereafter , $ 1.4 and $ 0.5 , respectively . leveraged lease during june 2002 , the company acquired a 90% ( 90 % ) equity participation interest in an existing leveraged lease of 30 properties . the properties are leased under a long-term bond-type net lease whose primary term expires in 2016 , with the lessee having certain renewal option rights . the company 2019s cash equity investment was approximately $ 4.0 million . this equity investment is reported as a net investment in leveraged lease in accordance with sfas no . 13 , accounting for leases ( as amended ) . from 2002 to 2007 , 18 of these properties were sold , whereby the proceeds from the sales were used to pay down the mortgage debt by approximately $ 31.2 million . as of december 31 , 2008 , the remaining 12 properties were encumbered by third-party non-recourse debt of approximately $ 42.8 million that is scheduled to fully amortize during the primary term of the lease from a portion of the periodic net rents receivable under the net lease . as an equity participant in the leveraged lease , the company has no recourse obligation for principal or interest payments on the debt , which is collateralized by a first mortgage lien on the properties and collateral assignment of the lease . accordingly , this obligation has been offset against the related net rental receivable under the lease . at december 31 , 2008 and 2007 , the company 2019s net investment in the leveraged lease consisted of the following ( in millions ) : .
||2008|2007|
|remaining net rentals|$ 53.8|$ 55.0|
|estimated unguaranteed residual value|31.7|36.0|
|non-recourse mortgage debt|-38.5 ( 38.5 )|-43.9 ( 43.9 )|
|unearned and deferred income|-43.0 ( 43.0 )|-43.3 ( 43.3 )|
|net investment in leveraged lease|$ 4.0|$ 3.8|
9 . mortgages and other financing receivables : the company has various mortgages and other financing receivables which consist of loans acquired and loans originated by the company . for a complete listing of the company 2019s mortgages and other financing receivables at december 31 , 2008 , see financial statement schedule iv included on page 141 of this annual report on form 10-k . reconciliation of mortgage loans and other financing receivables on real estate: .
Question: what is the growth rate in the income from investment in the retail store leases from 2006 to 2007? | -0.07692 | ### Transformed FinQA Question Generation Instructions
#### Step 1: Analyze and Understand the Original FinQA Question
- Objective: Use the given FinQA question to generate a new, logically similar but numerically different question.
- Guidelines:
- Identify the financial concepts and quantitative reasoning in the original question.
- Determine the key variables (e.g., revenue, profit, growth rate, interest) and their relationships.
- Maintain the original question’s structure and complexity.
#### Step 2: Transform and Adapt
- Objective: Create a new FinQA-style question while modifying numerical values and conditions.
- Guidelines:
- Change financial figures, constraints, or business conditions to create a unique question.
- Ensure the transformation maintains financial realism (e.g., realistic market trends, interest rates).
- Retain the original reasoning and computational steps while introducing fresh data points.
#### Step 3: Generate the New FinQA Question
- Objective: Output an original, transformed FinQA question without providing an answer or solution.
- Guidelines:
- Ensure the new question aligns with FinQA’s format and complexity.
- Maintain clarity and well-defined financial relationships.
### Response Rule
- **Generate only the "Transformed FinQA Question" for the given example without including any answer, explanation, or solution.**
### Output Format
#### Transformed FinQA Question: [Write your transformed FinQA question here.]
----
#### Task
#### Original FinQA Question: Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: kimco realty corporation and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements , continued investment in retail store leases the company has interests in various retail store leases relating to the anchor store premises in neighborhood and community shopping centers . these premises have been sublet to retailers who lease the stores pursuant to net lease agreements . income from the investment in these retail store leases during the years ended december 31 , 2008 , 2007 and 2006 , was approximately $ 2.7 million , $ 1.2 million and $ 1.3 million , respectively . these amounts represent sublease revenues during the years ended december 31 , 2008 , 2007 and 2006 , of approximately $ 7.1 million , $ 7.7 million and $ 8.2 million , respectively , less related expenses of $ 4.4 million , $ 5.1 million and $ 5.7 million , respectively , and an amount which , in management 2019s estimate , reasonably provides for the recovery of the investment over a period representing the expected remaining term of the retail store leases . the company 2019s future minimum revenues under the terms of all non-cancelable tenant subleases and future minimum obligations through the remaining terms of its retail store leases , assuming no new or renegotiated leases are executed for such premises , for future years are as follows ( in millions ) : 2009 , $ 5.6 and $ 3.8 ; 2010 , $ 5.4 and $ 3.7 ; 2011 , $ 4.5 and $ 3.1 ; 2012 , $ 2.3 and $ 2.1 ; 2013 , $ 1.0 and $ 1.3 and thereafter , $ 1.4 and $ 0.5 , respectively . leveraged lease during june 2002 , the company acquired a 90% ( 90 % ) equity participation interest in an existing leveraged lease of 30 properties . the properties are leased under a long-term bond-type net lease whose primary term expires in 2016 , with the lessee having certain renewal option rights . the company 2019s cash equity investment was approximately $ 4.0 million . this equity investment is reported as a net investment in leveraged lease in accordance with sfas no . 13 , accounting for leases ( as amended ) . from 2002 to 2007 , 18 of these properties were sold , whereby the proceeds from the sales were used to pay down the mortgage debt by approximately $ 31.2 million . as of december 31 , 2008 , the remaining 12 properties were encumbered by third-party non-recourse debt of approximately $ 42.8 million that is scheduled to fully amortize during the primary term of the lease from a portion of the periodic net rents receivable under the net lease . as an equity participant in the leveraged lease , the company has no recourse obligation for principal or interest payments on the debt , which is collateralized by a first mortgage lien on the properties and collateral assignment of the lease . accordingly , this obligation has been offset against the related net rental receivable under the lease . at december 31 , 2008 and 2007 , the company 2019s net investment in the leveraged lease consisted of the following ( in millions ) : .
||2008|2007|
|remaining net rentals|$ 53.8|$ 55.0|
|estimated unguaranteed residual value|31.7|36.0|
|non-recourse mortgage debt|-38.5 ( 38.5 )|-43.9 ( 43.9 )|
|unearned and deferred income|-43.0 ( 43.0 )|-43.3 ( 43.3 )|
|net investment in leveraged lease|$ 4.0|$ 3.8|
9 . mortgages and other financing receivables : the company has various mortgages and other financing receivables which consist of loans acquired and loans originated by the company . for a complete listing of the company 2019s mortgages and other financing receivables at december 31 , 2008 , see financial statement schedule iv included on page 141 of this annual report on form 10-k . reconciliation of mortgage loans and other financing receivables on real estate: .
Question: what is the growth rate in the income from investment in the retail store leases from 2006 to 2007? |
Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: management 2019s discussion and analysis sensitivity measures certain portfolios and individual positions are not included in var because var is not the most appropriate risk measure . the market risk of these positions is determined by estimating the potential reduction in net revenues of a 10% ( 10 % ) decline in the underlying asset value . the table below presents market risk for positions that are not included in var . these measures do not reflect diversification benefits across asset categories and therefore have not been aggregated . asset categories 10% ( 10 % ) sensitivity amount as of december in millions 2012 2011 .
|asset categories|asset categories||
|in millions|2012|2011|
|icbc|$ 208|$ 212|
|equity ( excluding icbc ) 1|2263|2458|
|debt2|1676|1521|
equity ( excluding icbc ) 1 2263 2458 debt 2 1676 1521 1 . relates to private and restricted public equity securities , including interests in firm-sponsored funds that invest in corporate equities and real estate and interests in firm-sponsored hedge funds . 2 . primarily relates to interests in our firm-sponsored funds that invest in corporate mezzanine and senior debt instruments . also includes loans backed by commercial and residential real estate , corporate bank loans and other corporate debt , including acquired portfolios of distressed loans . var excludes the impact of changes in counterparty and our own credit spreads on derivatives as well as changes in our own credit spreads on unsecured borrowings for which the fair value option was elected . the estimated sensitivity to a one basis point increase in credit spreads ( counterparty and our own ) on derivatives was a $ 3 million gain ( including hedges ) as of december 2012 . in addition , the estimated sensitivity to a one basis point increase in our own credit spreads on unsecured borrowings for which the fair value option was elected was a $ 7 million gain ( including hedges ) as of december 2012 . however , the actual net impact of a change in our own credit spreads is also affected by the liquidity , duration and convexity ( as the sensitivity is not linear to changes in yields ) of those unsecured borrowings for which the fair value option was elected , as well as the relative performance of any hedges undertaken . the firm engages in insurance activities where we reinsure and purchase portfolios of insurance risk and pension liabilities . the risks associated with these activities include , but are not limited to : equity price , interest rate , reinvestment and mortality risk . the firm mitigates risks associated with insurance activities through the use of reinsurance and hedging . certain of the assets associated with the firm 2019s insurance activities are included in var . in addition to the positions included in var , we held $ 9.07 billion of securities accounted for as available-for- sale as of december 2012 , which support the firm 2019s reinsurance business . as of december 2012 , our available- for-sale securities primarily consisted of $ 3.63 billion of corporate debt securities with an average yield of 4% ( 4 % ) , the majority of which will mature after five years , $ 3.38 billion of mortgage and other asset-backed loans and securities with an average yield of 6% ( 6 % ) , the majority of which will mature after ten years , and $ 856 million of u.s . government and federal agency obligations with an average yield of 3% ( 3 % ) , the majority of which will mature after five years . as of december 2012 , such assets were classified as held for sale and were included in 201cother assets . 201d see note 12 to the consolidated financial statements for further information about assets held for sale . as of december 2011 , we held $ 4.86 billion of securities accounted for as available-for-sale , primarily consisting of $ 1.81 billion of corporate debt securities with an average yield of 5% ( 5 % ) , the majority of which will mature after five years , $ 1.42 billion of mortgage and other asset-backed loans and securities with an average yield of 10% ( 10 % ) , the majority of which will mature after ten years , and $ 662 million of u.s . government and federal agency obligations with an average yield of 3% ( 3 % ) , the majority of which will mature after ten years . in addition , as of december 2012 and december 2011 , we had commitments and held loans for which we have obtained credit loss protection from sumitomo mitsui financial group , inc . see note 18 to the consolidated financial statements for further information about such lending commitments . as of december 2012 , the firm also had $ 6.50 billion of loans held for investment which were accounted for at amortized cost and included in 201creceivables from customers and counterparties , 201d substantially all of which had floating interest rates . the estimated sensitivity to a 100 basis point increase in interest rates on such loans was $ 62 million of additional interest income over a 12-month period , which does not take into account the potential impact of an increase in costs to fund such loans . see note 8 to the consolidated financial statements for further information about loans held for investment . additionally , we make investments accounted for under the equity method and we also make direct investments in real estate , both of which are included in 201cother assets 201d in the consolidated statements of financial condition . direct investments in real estate are accounted for at cost less accumulated depreciation . see note 12 to the consolidated financial statements for information on 201cother assets . 201d goldman sachs 2012 annual report 93 .
Question: as of december 2011 , what percentage of available- for-sale securities was comprised of mortgage and other asset-backed loans and securities? | 0.36485 | ### Transformed FinQA Question Generation Instructions
#### Step 1: Analyze and Understand the Original FinQA Question
- Objective: Use the given FinQA question to generate a new, logically similar but numerically different question.
- Guidelines:
- Identify the financial concepts and quantitative reasoning in the original question.
- Determine the key variables (e.g., revenue, profit, growth rate, interest) and their relationships.
- Maintain the original question’s structure and complexity.
#### Step 2: Transform and Adapt
- Objective: Create a new FinQA-style question while modifying numerical values and conditions.
- Guidelines:
- Change financial figures, constraints, or business conditions to create a unique question.
- Ensure the transformation maintains financial realism (e.g., realistic market trends, interest rates).
- Retain the original reasoning and computational steps while introducing fresh data points.
#### Step 3: Generate the New FinQA Question
- Objective: Output an original, transformed FinQA question without providing an answer or solution.
- Guidelines:
- Ensure the new question aligns with FinQA’s format and complexity.
- Maintain clarity and well-defined financial relationships.
### Response Rule
- **Generate only the "Transformed FinQA Question" for the given example without including any answer, explanation, or solution.**
### Output Format
#### Transformed FinQA Question: [Write your transformed FinQA question here.]
----
#### Task
#### Original FinQA Question: Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: management 2019s discussion and analysis sensitivity measures certain portfolios and individual positions are not included in var because var is not the most appropriate risk measure . the market risk of these positions is determined by estimating the potential reduction in net revenues of a 10% ( 10 % ) decline in the underlying asset value . the table below presents market risk for positions that are not included in var . these measures do not reflect diversification benefits across asset categories and therefore have not been aggregated . asset categories 10% ( 10 % ) sensitivity amount as of december in millions 2012 2011 .
|asset categories|asset categories||
|in millions|2012|2011|
|icbc|$ 208|$ 212|
|equity ( excluding icbc ) 1|2263|2458|
|debt2|1676|1521|
equity ( excluding icbc ) 1 2263 2458 debt 2 1676 1521 1 . relates to private and restricted public equity securities , including interests in firm-sponsored funds that invest in corporate equities and real estate and interests in firm-sponsored hedge funds . 2 . primarily relates to interests in our firm-sponsored funds that invest in corporate mezzanine and senior debt instruments . also includes loans backed by commercial and residential real estate , corporate bank loans and other corporate debt , including acquired portfolios of distressed loans . var excludes the impact of changes in counterparty and our own credit spreads on derivatives as well as changes in our own credit spreads on unsecured borrowings for which the fair value option was elected . the estimated sensitivity to a one basis point increase in credit spreads ( counterparty and our own ) on derivatives was a $ 3 million gain ( including hedges ) as of december 2012 . in addition , the estimated sensitivity to a one basis point increase in our own credit spreads on unsecured borrowings for which the fair value option was elected was a $ 7 million gain ( including hedges ) as of december 2012 . however , the actual net impact of a change in our own credit spreads is also affected by the liquidity , duration and convexity ( as the sensitivity is not linear to changes in yields ) of those unsecured borrowings for which the fair value option was elected , as well as the relative performance of any hedges undertaken . the firm engages in insurance activities where we reinsure and purchase portfolios of insurance risk and pension liabilities . the risks associated with these activities include , but are not limited to : equity price , interest rate , reinvestment and mortality risk . the firm mitigates risks associated with insurance activities through the use of reinsurance and hedging . certain of the assets associated with the firm 2019s insurance activities are included in var . in addition to the positions included in var , we held $ 9.07 billion of securities accounted for as available-for- sale as of december 2012 , which support the firm 2019s reinsurance business . as of december 2012 , our available- for-sale securities primarily consisted of $ 3.63 billion of corporate debt securities with an average yield of 4% ( 4 % ) , the majority of which will mature after five years , $ 3.38 billion of mortgage and other asset-backed loans and securities with an average yield of 6% ( 6 % ) , the majority of which will mature after ten years , and $ 856 million of u.s . government and federal agency obligations with an average yield of 3% ( 3 % ) , the majority of which will mature after five years . as of december 2012 , such assets were classified as held for sale and were included in 201cother assets . 201d see note 12 to the consolidated financial statements for further information about assets held for sale . as of december 2011 , we held $ 4.86 billion of securities accounted for as available-for-sale , primarily consisting of $ 1.81 billion of corporate debt securities with an average yield of 5% ( 5 % ) , the majority of which will mature after five years , $ 1.42 billion of mortgage and other asset-backed loans and securities with an average yield of 10% ( 10 % ) , the majority of which will mature after ten years , and $ 662 million of u.s . government and federal agency obligations with an average yield of 3% ( 3 % ) , the majority of which will mature after ten years . in addition , as of december 2012 and december 2011 , we had commitments and held loans for which we have obtained credit loss protection from sumitomo mitsui financial group , inc . see note 18 to the consolidated financial statements for further information about such lending commitments . as of december 2012 , the firm also had $ 6.50 billion of loans held for investment which were accounted for at amortized cost and included in 201creceivables from customers and counterparties , 201d substantially all of which had floating interest rates . the estimated sensitivity to a 100 basis point increase in interest rates on such loans was $ 62 million of additional interest income over a 12-month period , which does not take into account the potential impact of an increase in costs to fund such loans . see note 8 to the consolidated financial statements for further information about loans held for investment . additionally , we make investments accounted for under the equity method and we also make direct investments in real estate , both of which are included in 201cother assets 201d in the consolidated statements of financial condition . direct investments in real estate are accounted for at cost less accumulated depreciation . see note 12 to the consolidated financial statements for information on 201cother assets . 201d goldman sachs 2012 annual report 93 .
Question: as of december 2011 , what percentage of available- for-sale securities was comprised of mortgage and other asset-backed loans and securities? |
Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: higher in the first half of the year , but declined dur- ing the second half of the year reflecting the pass- through to customers of lower resin input costs . however , average margins benefitted from a more favorable mix of products sold . raw material costs were lower , primarily for resins . freight costs were also favorable , while operating costs increased . shorewood sales volumes in 2009 declined from 2008 levels reflecting weaker demand in the home entertainment segment and a decrease in tobacco segment orders as customers have shifted pro- duction outside of the united states , partially offset by higher shipments in the consumer products segment . average sales margins improved reflecting a more favorable mix of products sold . raw material costs were higher , but were partially offset by lower freight costs . operating costs were favorable , reflect- ing benefits from business reorganization and cost reduction actions taken in 2008 and 2009 . charges to restructure operations totaled $ 7 million in 2009 and $ 30 million in 2008 . entering 2010 , coated paperboard sales volumes are expected to increase , while average sales price real- izations should be comparable to 2009 fourth-quarter levels . raw material costs are expected to be sig- nificantly higher for wood , energy and chemicals , but planned maintenance downtime costs will decrease . foodservice sales volumes are expected to remain about flat , but average sales price realizations should improve slightly . input costs for resins should be higher , but will be partially offset by lower costs for bleached board . shorewood sales volumes are expected to decline reflecting seasonal decreases in home entertainment segment shipments . operating costs are expected to be favorable reflecting the benefits of business reorganization efforts . european consumer packaging net sales in 2009 were $ 315 million compared with $ 300 million in 2008 and $ 280 million in 2007 . operating earnings in 2009 of $ 66 million increased from $ 22 million in 2008 and $ 30 million in 2007 . sales volumes in 2009 were higher than in 2008 reflecting increased ship- ments to export markets . average sales margins declined due to increased shipments to lower- margin export markets and lower average sales prices in western europe . entering 2010 , sales volumes for the first quarter are expected to remain strong . average margins should improve reflecting increased sales price realizations and a more favorable geographic mix of products sold . input costs are expected to be higher due to increased wood prices in poland and annual energy tariff increases in russia . asian consumer packaging net sales were $ 545 million in 2009 compared with $ 390 million in 2008 and $ 330 million in 2007 . operating earnings in 2009 were $ 24 million compared with a loss of $ 13 million in 2008 and earnings of $ 12 million in 2007 . the improved operating earnings in 2009 reflect increased sales volumes , higher average sales mar- gins and lower input costs , primarily for chemicals . the loss in 2008 was primarily due to a $ 12 million charge to revalue pulp inventories at our shandong international paper and sun coated paperboard co. , ltd . joint venture and start-up costs associated with the joint venture 2019s new folding box board paper machine . distribution xpedx , our distribution business , markets a diverse array of products and supply chain services to cus- tomers in many business segments . customer demand is generally sensitive to changes in general economic conditions , although the commercial printing segment is also dependent on consumer advertising and promotional spending . distribution 2019s margins are relatively stable across an economic cycle . providing customers with the best choice and value in both products and supply chain services is a key competitive factor . additionally , efficient customer service , cost-effective logistics and focused working capital management are key factors in this segment 2019s profitability . distribution in millions 2009 2008 2007 .
|in millions|2009|2008|2007|
|sales|$ 6525|$ 7970|$ 7320|
|operating profit|50|103|108|
distribution 2019s 2009 annual sales decreased 18% ( 18 % ) from 2008 and 11% ( 11 % ) from 2007 while operating profits in 2009 decreased 51% ( 51 % ) compared with 2008 and 54% ( 54 % ) compared with 2007 . annual sales of printing papers and graphic arts supplies and equipment totaled $ 4.1 billion in 2009 compared with $ 5.2 billion in 2008 and $ 4.7 billion in 2007 , reflecting weak economic conditions in 2009 . trade margins as a percent of sales for printing papers increased from 2008 but decreased from 2007 due to a higher mix of lower margin direct ship- ments from manufacturers . revenue from packaging products was $ 1.3 billion in 2009 compared with $ 1.7 billion in 2008 and $ 1.5 billion in 2007 . trade margins as a percent of sales for packaging products were higher than in the past two years reflecting an improved product and service mix . facility supplies annual revenue was $ 1.1 billion in 2009 , essentially .
Question: what was the percentage decrease in annual sales of printing papers and graphic arts supplies and equipment from 2008 to 2009? | 0.21154 | ### Transformed FinQA Question Generation Instructions
#### Step 1: Analyze and Understand the Original FinQA Question
- Objective: Use the given FinQA question to generate a new, logically similar but numerically different question.
- Guidelines:
- Identify the financial concepts and quantitative reasoning in the original question.
- Determine the key variables (e.g., revenue, profit, growth rate, interest) and their relationships.
- Maintain the original question’s structure and complexity.
#### Step 2: Transform and Adapt
- Objective: Create a new FinQA-style question while modifying numerical values and conditions.
- Guidelines:
- Change financial figures, constraints, or business conditions to create a unique question.
- Ensure the transformation maintains financial realism (e.g., realistic market trends, interest rates).
- Retain the original reasoning and computational steps while introducing fresh data points.
#### Step 3: Generate the New FinQA Question
- Objective: Output an original, transformed FinQA question without providing an answer or solution.
- Guidelines:
- Ensure the new question aligns with FinQA’s format and complexity.
- Maintain clarity and well-defined financial relationships.
### Response Rule
- **Generate only the "Transformed FinQA Question" for the given example without including any answer, explanation, or solution.**
### Output Format
#### Transformed FinQA Question: [Write your transformed FinQA question here.]
----
#### Task
#### Original FinQA Question: Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: higher in the first half of the year , but declined dur- ing the second half of the year reflecting the pass- through to customers of lower resin input costs . however , average margins benefitted from a more favorable mix of products sold . raw material costs were lower , primarily for resins . freight costs were also favorable , while operating costs increased . shorewood sales volumes in 2009 declined from 2008 levels reflecting weaker demand in the home entertainment segment and a decrease in tobacco segment orders as customers have shifted pro- duction outside of the united states , partially offset by higher shipments in the consumer products segment . average sales margins improved reflecting a more favorable mix of products sold . raw material costs were higher , but were partially offset by lower freight costs . operating costs were favorable , reflect- ing benefits from business reorganization and cost reduction actions taken in 2008 and 2009 . charges to restructure operations totaled $ 7 million in 2009 and $ 30 million in 2008 . entering 2010 , coated paperboard sales volumes are expected to increase , while average sales price real- izations should be comparable to 2009 fourth-quarter levels . raw material costs are expected to be sig- nificantly higher for wood , energy and chemicals , but planned maintenance downtime costs will decrease . foodservice sales volumes are expected to remain about flat , but average sales price realizations should improve slightly . input costs for resins should be higher , but will be partially offset by lower costs for bleached board . shorewood sales volumes are expected to decline reflecting seasonal decreases in home entertainment segment shipments . operating costs are expected to be favorable reflecting the benefits of business reorganization efforts . european consumer packaging net sales in 2009 were $ 315 million compared with $ 300 million in 2008 and $ 280 million in 2007 . operating earnings in 2009 of $ 66 million increased from $ 22 million in 2008 and $ 30 million in 2007 . sales volumes in 2009 were higher than in 2008 reflecting increased ship- ments to export markets . average sales margins declined due to increased shipments to lower- margin export markets and lower average sales prices in western europe . entering 2010 , sales volumes for the first quarter are expected to remain strong . average margins should improve reflecting increased sales price realizations and a more favorable geographic mix of products sold . input costs are expected to be higher due to increased wood prices in poland and annual energy tariff increases in russia . asian consumer packaging net sales were $ 545 million in 2009 compared with $ 390 million in 2008 and $ 330 million in 2007 . operating earnings in 2009 were $ 24 million compared with a loss of $ 13 million in 2008 and earnings of $ 12 million in 2007 . the improved operating earnings in 2009 reflect increased sales volumes , higher average sales mar- gins and lower input costs , primarily for chemicals . the loss in 2008 was primarily due to a $ 12 million charge to revalue pulp inventories at our shandong international paper and sun coated paperboard co. , ltd . joint venture and start-up costs associated with the joint venture 2019s new folding box board paper machine . distribution xpedx , our distribution business , markets a diverse array of products and supply chain services to cus- tomers in many business segments . customer demand is generally sensitive to changes in general economic conditions , although the commercial printing segment is also dependent on consumer advertising and promotional spending . distribution 2019s margins are relatively stable across an economic cycle . providing customers with the best choice and value in both products and supply chain services is a key competitive factor . additionally , efficient customer service , cost-effective logistics and focused working capital management are key factors in this segment 2019s profitability . distribution in millions 2009 2008 2007 .
|in millions|2009|2008|2007|
|sales|$ 6525|$ 7970|$ 7320|
|operating profit|50|103|108|
distribution 2019s 2009 annual sales decreased 18% ( 18 % ) from 2008 and 11% ( 11 % ) from 2007 while operating profits in 2009 decreased 51% ( 51 % ) compared with 2008 and 54% ( 54 % ) compared with 2007 . annual sales of printing papers and graphic arts supplies and equipment totaled $ 4.1 billion in 2009 compared with $ 5.2 billion in 2008 and $ 4.7 billion in 2007 , reflecting weak economic conditions in 2009 . trade margins as a percent of sales for printing papers increased from 2008 but decreased from 2007 due to a higher mix of lower margin direct ship- ments from manufacturers . revenue from packaging products was $ 1.3 billion in 2009 compared with $ 1.7 billion in 2008 and $ 1.5 billion in 2007 . trade margins as a percent of sales for packaging products were higher than in the past two years reflecting an improved product and service mix . facility supplies annual revenue was $ 1.1 billion in 2009 , essentially .
Question: what was the percentage decrease in annual sales of printing papers and graphic arts supplies and equipment from 2008 to 2009? |
Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: american tower corporation and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements as of december 31 , 2010 and 2009 , the company had $ 295.4 million and $ 295.0 million net , respectively ( $ 300.0 million aggregate principal amount ) outstanding under the 7.25% ( 7.25 % ) notes . as of december 31 , 2010 and 2009 , the carrying value includes a discount of $ 4.6 million and $ 5.0 million , respectively . 5.0% ( 5.0 % ) convertible notes 2014the 5.0% ( 5.0 % ) convertible notes due 2010 ( 201c5.0% ( 201c5.0 % ) notes 201d ) matured on february 15 , 2010 , and interest was payable semiannually on february 15 and august 15 of each year . the 5.0% ( 5.0 % ) notes were convertible at any time into shares of the company 2019s class a common stock ( 201ccommon stock 201d ) at a conversion price of $ 51.50 per share , subject to adjustment in certain cases . as of december 31 , 2010 and 2009 , the company had none and $ 59.7 million outstanding , respectively , under the 5.0% ( 5.0 % ) notes . ati 7.25% ( 7.25 % ) senior subordinated notes 2014the ati 7.25% ( 7.25 % ) notes were issued with a maturity of december 1 , 2011 and interest was payable semi-annually in arrears on june 1 and december 1 of each year . the ati 7.25% ( 7.25 % ) notes were jointly and severally guaranteed on a senior subordinated basis by the company and substantially all of the wholly owned domestic restricted subsidiaries of ati and the company , other than spectrasite and its subsidiaries . the notes ranked junior in right of payment to all existing and future senior indebtedness of ati , the sister guarantors ( as defined in the indenture relating to the notes ) and their domestic restricted subsidiaries . the ati 7.25% ( 7.25 % ) notes were structurally senior in right of payment to all other existing and future indebtedness of the company , including the company 2019s senior notes , convertible notes and the revolving credit facility and term loan . during the year ended december 31 , 2010 , ati issued a notice for the redemption of the principal amount of its outstanding ati 7.25% ( 7.25 % ) notes . in accordance with the redemption provisions and the indenture for the ati 7.25% ( 7.25 % ) notes , the notes were redeemed at a price equal to 100.00% ( 100.00 % ) of the principal amount , plus accrued and unpaid interest up to , but excluding , september 23 , 2010 , for an aggregate purchase price of $ 0.3 million . as of december 31 , 2010 and 2009 , the company had none and $ 0.3 million , respectively , outstanding under the ati 7.25% ( 7.25 % ) notes . capital lease obligations and notes payable 2014the company 2019s capital lease obligations and notes payable approximated $ 46.3 million and $ 59.0 million as of december 31 , 2010 and 2009 , respectively . these obligations bear interest at rates ranging from 2.5% ( 2.5 % ) to 9.3% ( 9.3 % ) and mature in periods ranging from less than one year to approximately seventy years . maturities 2014as of december 31 , 2010 , aggregate carrying value of long-term debt , including capital leases , for the next five years and thereafter are estimated to be ( in thousands ) : year ending december 31 .
|2011|$ 74896|
|2012|625884|
|2013|618|
|2014|1750479|
|2015|600489|
|thereafter|2541858|
|total cash obligations|5594224|
|unamortized discounts and premiums net|-6836 ( 6836 )|
|balance as of december 31 2010|$ 5587388|
.
Question: what portion of total cash obligations is due within the next 12 months? | 0.01339 | ### Transformed FinQA Question Generation Instructions
#### Step 1: Analyze and Understand the Original FinQA Question
- Objective: Use the given FinQA question to generate a new, logically similar but numerically different question.
- Guidelines:
- Identify the financial concepts and quantitative reasoning in the original question.
- Determine the key variables (e.g., revenue, profit, growth rate, interest) and their relationships.
- Maintain the original question’s structure and complexity.
#### Step 2: Transform and Adapt
- Objective: Create a new FinQA-style question while modifying numerical values and conditions.
- Guidelines:
- Change financial figures, constraints, or business conditions to create a unique question.
- Ensure the transformation maintains financial realism (e.g., realistic market trends, interest rates).
- Retain the original reasoning and computational steps while introducing fresh data points.
#### Step 3: Generate the New FinQA Question
- Objective: Output an original, transformed FinQA question without providing an answer or solution.
- Guidelines:
- Ensure the new question aligns with FinQA’s format and complexity.
- Maintain clarity and well-defined financial relationships.
### Response Rule
- **Generate only the "Transformed FinQA Question" for the given example without including any answer, explanation, or solution.**
### Output Format
#### Transformed FinQA Question: [Write your transformed FinQA question here.]
----
#### Task
#### Original FinQA Question: Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: american tower corporation and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements as of december 31 , 2010 and 2009 , the company had $ 295.4 million and $ 295.0 million net , respectively ( $ 300.0 million aggregate principal amount ) outstanding under the 7.25% ( 7.25 % ) notes . as of december 31 , 2010 and 2009 , the carrying value includes a discount of $ 4.6 million and $ 5.0 million , respectively . 5.0% ( 5.0 % ) convertible notes 2014the 5.0% ( 5.0 % ) convertible notes due 2010 ( 201c5.0% ( 201c5.0 % ) notes 201d ) matured on february 15 , 2010 , and interest was payable semiannually on february 15 and august 15 of each year . the 5.0% ( 5.0 % ) notes were convertible at any time into shares of the company 2019s class a common stock ( 201ccommon stock 201d ) at a conversion price of $ 51.50 per share , subject to adjustment in certain cases . as of december 31 , 2010 and 2009 , the company had none and $ 59.7 million outstanding , respectively , under the 5.0% ( 5.0 % ) notes . ati 7.25% ( 7.25 % ) senior subordinated notes 2014the ati 7.25% ( 7.25 % ) notes were issued with a maturity of december 1 , 2011 and interest was payable semi-annually in arrears on june 1 and december 1 of each year . the ati 7.25% ( 7.25 % ) notes were jointly and severally guaranteed on a senior subordinated basis by the company and substantially all of the wholly owned domestic restricted subsidiaries of ati and the company , other than spectrasite and its subsidiaries . the notes ranked junior in right of payment to all existing and future senior indebtedness of ati , the sister guarantors ( as defined in the indenture relating to the notes ) and their domestic restricted subsidiaries . the ati 7.25% ( 7.25 % ) notes were structurally senior in right of payment to all other existing and future indebtedness of the company , including the company 2019s senior notes , convertible notes and the revolving credit facility and term loan . during the year ended december 31 , 2010 , ati issued a notice for the redemption of the principal amount of its outstanding ati 7.25% ( 7.25 % ) notes . in accordance with the redemption provisions and the indenture for the ati 7.25% ( 7.25 % ) notes , the notes were redeemed at a price equal to 100.00% ( 100.00 % ) of the principal amount , plus accrued and unpaid interest up to , but excluding , september 23 , 2010 , for an aggregate purchase price of $ 0.3 million . as of december 31 , 2010 and 2009 , the company had none and $ 0.3 million , respectively , outstanding under the ati 7.25% ( 7.25 % ) notes . capital lease obligations and notes payable 2014the company 2019s capital lease obligations and notes payable approximated $ 46.3 million and $ 59.0 million as of december 31 , 2010 and 2009 , respectively . these obligations bear interest at rates ranging from 2.5% ( 2.5 % ) to 9.3% ( 9.3 % ) and mature in periods ranging from less than one year to approximately seventy years . maturities 2014as of december 31 , 2010 , aggregate carrying value of long-term debt , including capital leases , for the next five years and thereafter are estimated to be ( in thousands ) : year ending december 31 .
|2011|$ 74896|
|2012|625884|
|2013|618|
|2014|1750479|
|2015|600489|
|thereafter|2541858|
|total cash obligations|5594224|
|unamortized discounts and premiums net|-6836 ( 6836 )|
|balance as of december 31 2010|$ 5587388|
.
Question: what portion of total cash obligations is due within the next 12 months? |
Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: item 2 . properties we employ a variety of assets in the management and operation of our rail business . our rail network covers 23 states in the western two-thirds of the u.s . our rail network includes 31838 route miles . we own 26009 miles and operate on the remainder pursuant to trackage rights or leases . the following table describes track miles at december 31 , 2013 and 2012 . 2013 2012 .
||2013|2012|
|route|31838|31868|
|other main line|6766|6715|
|passing lines and turnouts|3167|3124|
|switching and classification yard lines|9090|9046|
|total miles|50861|50753|
headquarters building we maintain our headquarters in omaha , nebraska . the facility has 1.2 million square feet of space for approximately 4000 employees and is subject to a financing arrangement . harriman dispatching center the harriman dispatching center ( hdc ) , located in omaha , nebraska , is our primary dispatching facility . it is linked to regional dispatching and locomotive management facilities at various locations along our .
Question: what is the percent of the owned and operated of the rail network route miles | 0.81692 | ### Transformed FinQA Question Generation Instructions
#### Step 1: Analyze and Understand the Original FinQA Question
- Objective: Use the given FinQA question to generate a new, logically similar but numerically different question.
- Guidelines:
- Identify the financial concepts and quantitative reasoning in the original question.
- Determine the key variables (e.g., revenue, profit, growth rate, interest) and their relationships.
- Maintain the original question’s structure and complexity.
#### Step 2: Transform and Adapt
- Objective: Create a new FinQA-style question while modifying numerical values and conditions.
- Guidelines:
- Change financial figures, constraints, or business conditions to create a unique question.
- Ensure the transformation maintains financial realism (e.g., realistic market trends, interest rates).
- Retain the original reasoning and computational steps while introducing fresh data points.
#### Step 3: Generate the New FinQA Question
- Objective: Output an original, transformed FinQA question without providing an answer or solution.
- Guidelines:
- Ensure the new question aligns with FinQA’s format and complexity.
- Maintain clarity and well-defined financial relationships.
### Response Rule
- **Generate only the "Transformed FinQA Question" for the given example without including any answer, explanation, or solution.**
### Output Format
#### Transformed FinQA Question: [Write your transformed FinQA question here.]
----
#### Task
#### Original FinQA Question: Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: item 2 . properties we employ a variety of assets in the management and operation of our rail business . our rail network covers 23 states in the western two-thirds of the u.s . our rail network includes 31838 route miles . we own 26009 miles and operate on the remainder pursuant to trackage rights or leases . the following table describes track miles at december 31 , 2013 and 2012 . 2013 2012 .
||2013|2012|
|route|31838|31868|
|other main line|6766|6715|
|passing lines and turnouts|3167|3124|
|switching and classification yard lines|9090|9046|
|total miles|50861|50753|
headquarters building we maintain our headquarters in omaha , nebraska . the facility has 1.2 million square feet of space for approximately 4000 employees and is subject to a financing arrangement . harriman dispatching center the harriman dispatching center ( hdc ) , located in omaha , nebraska , is our primary dispatching facility . it is linked to regional dispatching and locomotive management facilities at various locations along our .
Question: what is the percent of the owned and operated of the rail network route miles |
Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: the company has elected the fair-value option where the interest-rate risk of such liabilities is economically hedged with derivative contracts or the proceeds are used to purchase financial assets that will also be accounted for at fair value through earnings . the election has been made to mitigate accounting mismatches and to achieve operational simplifications . these positions are reported in short-term borrowings and long-term debt on the company 2019s consolidated balance sheet . the majority of these non-structured liabilities are a result of the company 2019s election of the fair-value option for liabilities associated with the citi-advised structured investment vehicles ( sivs ) , which were consolidated during the fourth quarter of 2007 . the change in fair values of the sivs 2019 liabilities reported in earnings was $ 2.6 billion for the year ended december 31 , 2008 . for these non-structured liabilities the aggregate fair value is $ 263 million lower than the aggregate unpaid principal balance as of december 31 , 2008 . for all other non-structured liabilities classified as long-term debt for which the fair-value option has been elected , the aggregate unpaid principal balance exceeds the aggregate fair value of such instruments by $ 97 million as of december 31 , 2008 while the aggregate fair value exceeded the aggregate unpaid principal by $ 112 million as of december 31 , 2007 . the change in fair value of these non-structured liabilities reported a gain of $ 1.2 billion for the year ended december 31 , 2008 . the change in fair value for these non-structured liabilities is reported in principal transactions in the company 2019s consolidated statement of income . related interest expense continues to be measured based on the contractual interest rates and reported as such in the consolidated income statement . certain mortgage loans citigroup has elected the fair-value option for certain purchased and originated prime fixed-rate and conforming adjustable-rate first mortgage loans held-for- sale . these loans are intended for sale or securitization and are hedged with derivative instruments . the company has elected the fair-value option to mitigate accounting mismatches in cases where hedge accounting is complex and to achieve operational simplifications . the fair-value option was not elected for loans held-for-investment , as those loans are not hedged with derivative instruments . this election was effective for applicable instruments originated or purchased on or after september 1 , 2007 . the following table provides information about certain mortgage loans carried at fair value : in millions of dollars december 31 , december 31 , carrying amount reported on the consolidated balance sheet $ 4273 $ 6392 aggregate fair value in excess of unpaid principal balance $ 138 $ 136 balance on non-accrual loans or loans more than 90 days past due $ 9 $ 17 aggregate unpaid principal balance in excess of fair value for non-accrual loans or loans more than 90 days past due $ 2 $ 2014 the changes in fair values of these mortgage loans is reported in other revenue in the company 2019s consolidated statement of income . the changes in fair value during the year ended december 31 , 2008 due to instrument- specific credit risk resulted in a $ 32 million loss . the change in fair value during 2007 due to instrument-specific credit risk was immaterial . related interest income continues to be measured based on the contractual interest rates and reported as such in the consolidated income statement . items selected for fair-value accounting in accordance with sfas 155 and sfas 156 certain hybrid financial instruments the company has elected to apply fair-value accounting under sfas 155 for certain hybrid financial assets and liabilities whose performance is linked to risks other than interest rate , foreign exchange or inflation ( e.g. , equity , credit or commodity risks ) . in addition , the company has elected fair-value accounting under sfas 155 for residual interests retained from securitizing certain financial assets . the company has elected fair-value accounting for these instruments because these exposures are considered to be trading-related positions and , therefore , are managed on a fair-value basis . in addition , the accounting for these instruments is simplified under a fair-value approach as it eliminates the complicated operational requirements of bifurcating the embedded derivatives from the host contracts and accounting for each separately . the hybrid financial instruments are classified as trading account assets , loans , deposits , trading account liabilities ( for prepaid derivatives ) , short-term borrowings or long-term debt on the company 2019s consolidated balance sheet according to their legal form , while residual interests in certain securitizations are classified as trading account assets . for hybrid financial instruments for which fair-value accounting has been elected under sfas 155 and that are classified as long-term debt , the aggregate unpaid principal exceeds the aggregate fair value by $ 1.9 billion as of december 31 , 2008 , while the aggregate fair value exceeds the aggregate unpaid principal balance by $ 460 million as of december 31 , 2007 . the difference for those instruments classified as loans is immaterial . changes in fair value for hybrid financial instruments , which in most cases includes a component for accrued interest , are recorded in principal transactions in the company 2019s consolidated statement of income . interest accruals for certain hybrid instruments classified as trading assets are recorded separately from the change in fair value as interest revenue in the company 2019s consolidated statement of income . mortgage servicing rights the company accounts for mortgage servicing rights ( msrs ) at fair value in accordance with sfas 156 . fair value for msrs is determined using an option-adjusted spread valuation approach . this approach consists of projecting servicing cash flows under multiple interest-rate scenarios and discounting these cash flows using risk-adjusted rates . the model assumptions used in the valuation of msrs include mortgage prepayment speeds and discount rates . the fair value of msrs is primarily affected by changes in prepayments that result from shifts in mortgage interest rates . in managing this risk , the company hedges a significant portion of the values of its msrs through the use of interest-rate derivative contracts , forward- purchase commitments of mortgage-backed securities , and purchased securities classified as trading . see note 23 on page 175 for further discussions regarding the accounting and reporting of msrs . these msrs , which totaled $ 5.7 billion and $ 8.4 billion as of december 31 , 2008 and december 31 , 2007 , respectively , are classified as mortgage servicing rights on citigroup 2019s consolidated balance sheet . changes in fair value of msrs are recorded in commissions and fees in the company 2019s consolidated statement of income. .
|in millions of dollars|december 31 2008|december 31 2007|
|carrying amount reported on the consolidated balance sheet|$ 4273|$ 6392|
|aggregate fair value in excess of unpaid principal balance|$ 138|$ 136|
|balance on non-accrual loans or loans more than 90 days past due|$ 9|$ 17|
|aggregate unpaid principal balance in excess of fair value for non-accrual loans or loans more than 90 days pastdue|$ 2|$ 2014|
the company has elected the fair-value option where the interest-rate risk of such liabilities is economically hedged with derivative contracts or the proceeds are used to purchase financial assets that will also be accounted for at fair value through earnings . the election has been made to mitigate accounting mismatches and to achieve operational simplifications . these positions are reported in short-term borrowings and long-term debt on the company 2019s consolidated balance sheet . the majority of these non-structured liabilities are a result of the company 2019s election of the fair-value option for liabilities associated with the citi-advised structured investment vehicles ( sivs ) , which were consolidated during the fourth quarter of 2007 . the change in fair values of the sivs 2019 liabilities reported in earnings was $ 2.6 billion for the year ended december 31 , 2008 . for these non-structured liabilities the aggregate fair value is $ 263 million lower than the aggregate unpaid principal balance as of december 31 , 2008 . for all other non-structured liabilities classified as long-term debt for which the fair-value option has been elected , the aggregate unpaid principal balance exceeds the aggregate fair value of such instruments by $ 97 million as of december 31 , 2008 while the aggregate fair value exceeded the aggregate unpaid principal by $ 112 million as of december 31 , 2007 . the change in fair value of these non-structured liabilities reported a gain of $ 1.2 billion for the year ended december 31 , 2008 . the change in fair value for these non-structured liabilities is reported in principal transactions in the company 2019s consolidated statement of income . related interest expense continues to be measured based on the contractual interest rates and reported as such in the consolidated income statement . certain mortgage loans citigroup has elected the fair-value option for certain purchased and originated prime fixed-rate and conforming adjustable-rate first mortgage loans held-for- sale . these loans are intended for sale or securitization and are hedged with derivative instruments . the company has elected the fair-value option to mitigate accounting mismatches in cases where hedge accounting is complex and to achieve operational simplifications . the fair-value option was not elected for loans held-for-investment , as those loans are not hedged with derivative instruments . this election was effective for applicable instruments originated or purchased on or after september 1 , 2007 . the following table provides information about certain mortgage loans carried at fair value : in millions of dollars december 31 , december 31 , carrying amount reported on the consolidated balance sheet $ 4273 $ 6392 aggregate fair value in excess of unpaid principal balance $ 138 $ 136 balance on non-accrual loans or loans more than 90 days past due $ 9 $ 17 aggregate unpaid principal balance in excess of fair value for non-accrual loans or loans more than 90 days past due $ 2 $ 2014 the changes in fair values of these mortgage loans is reported in other revenue in the company 2019s consolidated statement of income . the changes in fair value during the year ended december 31 , 2008 due to instrument- specific credit risk resulted in a $ 32 million loss . the change in fair value during 2007 due to instrument-specific credit risk was immaterial . related interest income continues to be measured based on the contractual interest rates and reported as such in the consolidated income statement . items selected for fair-value accounting in accordance with sfas 155 and sfas 156 certain hybrid financial instruments the company has elected to apply fair-value accounting under sfas 155 for certain hybrid financial assets and liabilities whose performance is linked to risks other than interest rate , foreign exchange or inflation ( e.g. , equity , credit or commodity risks ) . in addition , the company has elected fair-value accounting under sfas 155 for residual interests retained from securitizing certain financial assets . the company has elected fair-value accounting for these instruments because these exposures are considered to be trading-related positions and , therefore , are managed on a fair-value basis . in addition , the accounting for these instruments is simplified under a fair-value approach as it eliminates the complicated operational requirements of bifurcating the embedded derivatives from the host contracts and accounting for each separately . the hybrid financial instruments are classified as trading account assets , loans , deposits , trading account liabilities ( for prepaid derivatives ) , short-term borrowings or long-term debt on the company 2019s consolidated balance sheet according to their legal form , while residual interests in certain securitizations are classified as trading account assets . for hybrid financial instruments for which fair-value accounting has been elected under sfas 155 and that are classified as long-term debt , the aggregate unpaid principal exceeds the aggregate fair value by $ 1.9 billion as of december 31 , 2008 , while the aggregate fair value exceeds the aggregate unpaid principal balance by $ 460 million as of december 31 , 2007 . the difference for those instruments classified as loans is immaterial . changes in fair value for hybrid financial instruments , which in most cases includes a component for accrued interest , are recorded in principal transactions in the company 2019s consolidated statement of income . interest accruals for certain hybrid instruments classified as trading assets are recorded separately from the change in fair value as interest revenue in the company 2019s consolidated statement of income . mortgage servicing rights the company accounts for mortgage servicing rights ( msrs ) at fair value in accordance with sfas 156 . fair value for msrs is determined using an option-adjusted spread valuation approach . this approach consists of projecting servicing cash flows under multiple interest-rate scenarios and discounting these cash flows using risk-adjusted rates . the model assumptions used in the valuation of msrs include mortgage prepayment speeds and discount rates . the fair value of msrs is primarily affected by changes in prepayments that result from shifts in mortgage interest rates . in managing this risk , the company hedges a significant portion of the values of its msrs through the use of interest-rate derivative contracts , forward- purchase commitments of mortgage-backed securities , and purchased securities classified as trading . see note 23 on page 175 for further discussions regarding the accounting and reporting of msrs . these msrs , which totaled $ 5.7 billion and $ 8.4 billion as of december 31 , 2008 and december 31 , 2007 , respectively , are classified as mortgage servicing rights on citigroup 2019s consolidated balance sheet . changes in fair value of msrs are recorded in commissions and fees in the company 2019s consolidated statement of income. .
Question: what was the change in millions of the carrying amount reported on the consolidated balance sheet from 2007 to 2008? | -2119.0 | ### Transformed FinQA Question Generation Instructions
#### Step 1: Analyze and Understand the Original FinQA Question
- Objective: Use the given FinQA question to generate a new, logically similar but numerically different question.
- Guidelines:
- Identify the financial concepts and quantitative reasoning in the original question.
- Determine the key variables (e.g., revenue, profit, growth rate, interest) and their relationships.
- Maintain the original question’s structure and complexity.
#### Step 2: Transform and Adapt
- Objective: Create a new FinQA-style question while modifying numerical values and conditions.
- Guidelines:
- Change financial figures, constraints, or business conditions to create a unique question.
- Ensure the transformation maintains financial realism (e.g., realistic market trends, interest rates).
- Retain the original reasoning and computational steps while introducing fresh data points.
#### Step 3: Generate the New FinQA Question
- Objective: Output an original, transformed FinQA question without providing an answer or solution.
- Guidelines:
- Ensure the new question aligns with FinQA’s format and complexity.
- Maintain clarity and well-defined financial relationships.
### Response Rule
- **Generate only the "Transformed FinQA Question" for the given example without including any answer, explanation, or solution.**
### Output Format
#### Transformed FinQA Question: [Write your transformed FinQA question here.]
----
#### Task
#### Original FinQA Question: Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: the company has elected the fair-value option where the interest-rate risk of such liabilities is economically hedged with derivative contracts or the proceeds are used to purchase financial assets that will also be accounted for at fair value through earnings . the election has been made to mitigate accounting mismatches and to achieve operational simplifications . these positions are reported in short-term borrowings and long-term debt on the company 2019s consolidated balance sheet . the majority of these non-structured liabilities are a result of the company 2019s election of the fair-value option for liabilities associated with the citi-advised structured investment vehicles ( sivs ) , which were consolidated during the fourth quarter of 2007 . the change in fair values of the sivs 2019 liabilities reported in earnings was $ 2.6 billion for the year ended december 31 , 2008 . for these non-structured liabilities the aggregate fair value is $ 263 million lower than the aggregate unpaid principal balance as of december 31 , 2008 . for all other non-structured liabilities classified as long-term debt for which the fair-value option has been elected , the aggregate unpaid principal balance exceeds the aggregate fair value of such instruments by $ 97 million as of december 31 , 2008 while the aggregate fair value exceeded the aggregate unpaid principal by $ 112 million as of december 31 , 2007 . the change in fair value of these non-structured liabilities reported a gain of $ 1.2 billion for the year ended december 31 , 2008 . the change in fair value for these non-structured liabilities is reported in principal transactions in the company 2019s consolidated statement of income . related interest expense continues to be measured based on the contractual interest rates and reported as such in the consolidated income statement . certain mortgage loans citigroup has elected the fair-value option for certain purchased and originated prime fixed-rate and conforming adjustable-rate first mortgage loans held-for- sale . these loans are intended for sale or securitization and are hedged with derivative instruments . the company has elected the fair-value option to mitigate accounting mismatches in cases where hedge accounting is complex and to achieve operational simplifications . the fair-value option was not elected for loans held-for-investment , as those loans are not hedged with derivative instruments . this election was effective for applicable instruments originated or purchased on or after september 1 , 2007 . the following table provides information about certain mortgage loans carried at fair value : in millions of dollars december 31 , december 31 , carrying amount reported on the consolidated balance sheet $ 4273 $ 6392 aggregate fair value in excess of unpaid principal balance $ 138 $ 136 balance on non-accrual loans or loans more than 90 days past due $ 9 $ 17 aggregate unpaid principal balance in excess of fair value for non-accrual loans or loans more than 90 days past due $ 2 $ 2014 the changes in fair values of these mortgage loans is reported in other revenue in the company 2019s consolidated statement of income . the changes in fair value during the year ended december 31 , 2008 due to instrument- specific credit risk resulted in a $ 32 million loss . the change in fair value during 2007 due to instrument-specific credit risk was immaterial . related interest income continues to be measured based on the contractual interest rates and reported as such in the consolidated income statement . items selected for fair-value accounting in accordance with sfas 155 and sfas 156 certain hybrid financial instruments the company has elected to apply fair-value accounting under sfas 155 for certain hybrid financial assets and liabilities whose performance is linked to risks other than interest rate , foreign exchange or inflation ( e.g. , equity , credit or commodity risks ) . in addition , the company has elected fair-value accounting under sfas 155 for residual interests retained from securitizing certain financial assets . the company has elected fair-value accounting for these instruments because these exposures are considered to be trading-related positions and , therefore , are managed on a fair-value basis . in addition , the accounting for these instruments is simplified under a fair-value approach as it eliminates the complicated operational requirements of bifurcating the embedded derivatives from the host contracts and accounting for each separately . the hybrid financial instruments are classified as trading account assets , loans , deposits , trading account liabilities ( for prepaid derivatives ) , short-term borrowings or long-term debt on the company 2019s consolidated balance sheet according to their legal form , while residual interests in certain securitizations are classified as trading account assets . for hybrid financial instruments for which fair-value accounting has been elected under sfas 155 and that are classified as long-term debt , the aggregate unpaid principal exceeds the aggregate fair value by $ 1.9 billion as of december 31 , 2008 , while the aggregate fair value exceeds the aggregate unpaid principal balance by $ 460 million as of december 31 , 2007 . the difference for those instruments classified as loans is immaterial . changes in fair value for hybrid financial instruments , which in most cases includes a component for accrued interest , are recorded in principal transactions in the company 2019s consolidated statement of income . interest accruals for certain hybrid instruments classified as trading assets are recorded separately from the change in fair value as interest revenue in the company 2019s consolidated statement of income . mortgage servicing rights the company accounts for mortgage servicing rights ( msrs ) at fair value in accordance with sfas 156 . fair value for msrs is determined using an option-adjusted spread valuation approach . this approach consists of projecting servicing cash flows under multiple interest-rate scenarios and discounting these cash flows using risk-adjusted rates . the model assumptions used in the valuation of msrs include mortgage prepayment speeds and discount rates . the fair value of msrs is primarily affected by changes in prepayments that result from shifts in mortgage interest rates . in managing this risk , the company hedges a significant portion of the values of its msrs through the use of interest-rate derivative contracts , forward- purchase commitments of mortgage-backed securities , and purchased securities classified as trading . see note 23 on page 175 for further discussions regarding the accounting and reporting of msrs . these msrs , which totaled $ 5.7 billion and $ 8.4 billion as of december 31 , 2008 and december 31 , 2007 , respectively , are classified as mortgage servicing rights on citigroup 2019s consolidated balance sheet . changes in fair value of msrs are recorded in commissions and fees in the company 2019s consolidated statement of income. .
|in millions of dollars|december 31 2008|december 31 2007|
|carrying amount reported on the consolidated balance sheet|$ 4273|$ 6392|
|aggregate fair value in excess of unpaid principal balance|$ 138|$ 136|
|balance on non-accrual loans or loans more than 90 days past due|$ 9|$ 17|
|aggregate unpaid principal balance in excess of fair value for non-accrual loans or loans more than 90 days pastdue|$ 2|$ 2014|
the company has elected the fair-value option where the interest-rate risk of such liabilities is economically hedged with derivative contracts or the proceeds are used to purchase financial assets that will also be accounted for at fair value through earnings . the election has been made to mitigate accounting mismatches and to achieve operational simplifications . these positions are reported in short-term borrowings and long-term debt on the company 2019s consolidated balance sheet . the majority of these non-structured liabilities are a result of the company 2019s election of the fair-value option for liabilities associated with the citi-advised structured investment vehicles ( sivs ) , which were consolidated during the fourth quarter of 2007 . the change in fair values of the sivs 2019 liabilities reported in earnings was $ 2.6 billion for the year ended december 31 , 2008 . for these non-structured liabilities the aggregate fair value is $ 263 million lower than the aggregate unpaid principal balance as of december 31 , 2008 . for all other non-structured liabilities classified as long-term debt for which the fair-value option has been elected , the aggregate unpaid principal balance exceeds the aggregate fair value of such instruments by $ 97 million as of december 31 , 2008 while the aggregate fair value exceeded the aggregate unpaid principal by $ 112 million as of december 31 , 2007 . the change in fair value of these non-structured liabilities reported a gain of $ 1.2 billion for the year ended december 31 , 2008 . the change in fair value for these non-structured liabilities is reported in principal transactions in the company 2019s consolidated statement of income . related interest expense continues to be measured based on the contractual interest rates and reported as such in the consolidated income statement . certain mortgage loans citigroup has elected the fair-value option for certain purchased and originated prime fixed-rate and conforming adjustable-rate first mortgage loans held-for- sale . these loans are intended for sale or securitization and are hedged with derivative instruments . the company has elected the fair-value option to mitigate accounting mismatches in cases where hedge accounting is complex and to achieve operational simplifications . the fair-value option was not elected for loans held-for-investment , as those loans are not hedged with derivative instruments . this election was effective for applicable instruments originated or purchased on or after september 1 , 2007 . the following table provides information about certain mortgage loans carried at fair value : in millions of dollars december 31 , december 31 , carrying amount reported on the consolidated balance sheet $ 4273 $ 6392 aggregate fair value in excess of unpaid principal balance $ 138 $ 136 balance on non-accrual loans or loans more than 90 days past due $ 9 $ 17 aggregate unpaid principal balance in excess of fair value for non-accrual loans or loans more than 90 days past due $ 2 $ 2014 the changes in fair values of these mortgage loans is reported in other revenue in the company 2019s consolidated statement of income . the changes in fair value during the year ended december 31 , 2008 due to instrument- specific credit risk resulted in a $ 32 million loss . the change in fair value during 2007 due to instrument-specific credit risk was immaterial . related interest income continues to be measured based on the contractual interest rates and reported as such in the consolidated income statement . items selected for fair-value accounting in accordance with sfas 155 and sfas 156 certain hybrid financial instruments the company has elected to apply fair-value accounting under sfas 155 for certain hybrid financial assets and liabilities whose performance is linked to risks other than interest rate , foreign exchange or inflation ( e.g. , equity , credit or commodity risks ) . in addition , the company has elected fair-value accounting under sfas 155 for residual interests retained from securitizing certain financial assets . the company has elected fair-value accounting for these instruments because these exposures are considered to be trading-related positions and , therefore , are managed on a fair-value basis . in addition , the accounting for these instruments is simplified under a fair-value approach as it eliminates the complicated operational requirements of bifurcating the embedded derivatives from the host contracts and accounting for each separately . the hybrid financial instruments are classified as trading account assets , loans , deposits , trading account liabilities ( for prepaid derivatives ) , short-term borrowings or long-term debt on the company 2019s consolidated balance sheet according to their legal form , while residual interests in certain securitizations are classified as trading account assets . for hybrid financial instruments for which fair-value accounting has been elected under sfas 155 and that are classified as long-term debt , the aggregate unpaid principal exceeds the aggregate fair value by $ 1.9 billion as of december 31 , 2008 , while the aggregate fair value exceeds the aggregate unpaid principal balance by $ 460 million as of december 31 , 2007 . the difference for those instruments classified as loans is immaterial . changes in fair value for hybrid financial instruments , which in most cases includes a component for accrued interest , are recorded in principal transactions in the company 2019s consolidated statement of income . interest accruals for certain hybrid instruments classified as trading assets are recorded separately from the change in fair value as interest revenue in the company 2019s consolidated statement of income . mortgage servicing rights the company accounts for mortgage servicing rights ( msrs ) at fair value in accordance with sfas 156 . fair value for msrs is determined using an option-adjusted spread valuation approach . this approach consists of projecting servicing cash flows under multiple interest-rate scenarios and discounting these cash flows using risk-adjusted rates . the model assumptions used in the valuation of msrs include mortgage prepayment speeds and discount rates . the fair value of msrs is primarily affected by changes in prepayments that result from shifts in mortgage interest rates . in managing this risk , the company hedges a significant portion of the values of its msrs through the use of interest-rate derivative contracts , forward- purchase commitments of mortgage-backed securities , and purchased securities classified as trading . see note 23 on page 175 for further discussions regarding the accounting and reporting of msrs . these msrs , which totaled $ 5.7 billion and $ 8.4 billion as of december 31 , 2008 and december 31 , 2007 , respectively , are classified as mortgage servicing rights on citigroup 2019s consolidated balance sheet . changes in fair value of msrs are recorded in commissions and fees in the company 2019s consolidated statement of income. .
Question: what was the change in millions of the carrying amount reported on the consolidated balance sheet from 2007 to 2008? |
Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: our international networks segment owns and operates the following television networks , which reached the following number of subscribers via pay television services as of december 31 , 2013 : global networks international subscribers ( millions ) regional networks international subscribers ( millions ) .
|global networks discovery channel|internationalsubscribers ( millions ) 271|regional networks discovery kids|internationalsubscribers ( millions ) 76|
|animal planet|200|sbs nordic ( a )|28|
|tlc real time and travel & living|162|dmax ( b )|16|
|discovery science|81|discovery history|14|
|investigation discovery|74|shed|12|
|discovery home & health|64|discovery en espanol ( u.s. )|5|
|turbo|52|discovery familia ( u.s. )|4|
|discovery world|23|gxt|4|
( a ) number of subscribers corresponds to the collective sum of the total number of subscribers to each of the sbs nordic broadcast networks in sweden , norway , and denmark subject to retransmission agreements with pay television providers . ( b ) number of subscribers corresponds to dmax pay television networks in the u.k. , austria , switzerland and ireland . our international networks segment also owns and operates free-to-air television networks which reached 285 million cumulative viewers in europe and the middle east as of december 31 , 2013 . our free-to-air networks include dmax , fatafeat , quest , real time , giallo , frisbee , focus and k2 . similar to u.s . networks , the primary sources of revenue for international networks are fees charged to operators who distribute our networks , which primarily include cable and dth satellite service providers , and advertising sold on our television networks . international television markets vary in their stages of development . some markets , such as the u.k. , are more advanced digital television markets , while others remain in the analog environment with varying degrees of investment from operators to expand channel capacity or convert to digital technologies . common practice in some markets results in long-term contractual distribution relationships , while customers in other markets renew contracts annually . distribution revenue for our international networks segment is largely dependent on the number of subscribers that receive our networks or content , the rates negotiated in the agreements , and the market demand for the content that we provide . advertising revenue is dependent upon a number of factors including the development of pay and free-to-air television markets , the number of subscribers to and viewers of our channels , viewership demographics , the popularity of our programming , and our ability to sell commercial time over a group of channels . in certain markets , our advertising sales business operates with in-house sales teams , while we rely on external sales representation services in other markets . in developing television markets , we expect that advertising revenue growth will result from continued subscriber and viewership growth , our localization strategy , and the shift of advertising spending from traditional analog networks to channels in the multi-channel environment . in relatively mature markets , such as western europe , growth in advertising revenue will come from increasing viewership and pricing of advertising on our existing television networks and the launching of new services , both organic and through acquisitions . during 2013 , distribution , advertising and other revenues were 50% ( 50 % ) , 47% ( 47 % ) and 3% ( 3 % ) , respectively , of total net revenues for this segment . on january 21 , 2014 , we entered into an agreement with tf1 to acquire a controlling interest in eurosport international ( "eurosport" ) , a leading pan-european sports media platform , by increasing our ownership stake from 20% ( 20 % ) to 51% ( 51 % ) for cash of approximately 20ac253 million ( $ 343 million ) subject to working capital adjustments . due to regulatory constraints the acquisition initially excludes eurosport france , a subsidiary of eurosport . we will retain a 20% ( 20 % ) equity interest in eurosport france and a commitment to acquire another 31% ( 31 % ) ownership interest beginning 2015 , contingent upon resolution of all regulatory matters . the flagship eurosport network focuses on regionally popular sports such as tennis , skiing , cycling and motor sports and reaches 133 million homes across 54 countries in 20 languages . eurosport 2019s brands and platforms also include eurosport hd ( high definition simulcast ) , eurosport 2 , eurosport 2 hd ( high definition simulcast ) , eurosport asia-pacific , and eurosportnews . the acquisition is intended to increase the growth of eurosport and enhance our pay television offerings in europe . tf1 will have the right to put the entirety of its remaining 49% ( 49 % ) non-controlling interest to us for approximately two and a half years after completion of this acquisition . the put has a floor value equal to the fair value at the acquisition date if exercised in the 90 day period beginning on july 1 , 2015 and is subsequently priced at fair value if exercised in the 90 day period beginning on july 1 , 2016 . we expect the acquisition to close in the second quarter of 2014 subject to obtaining necessary regulatory approvals. .
Question: as of january 21 , 2014 , what was the implied total value of eurosport international based on the price paid for the increased ownership , in us$ millions ? | 1106.45161 | ### Transformed FinQA Question Generation Instructions
#### Step 1: Analyze and Understand the Original FinQA Question
- Objective: Use the given FinQA question to generate a new, logically similar but numerically different question.
- Guidelines:
- Identify the financial concepts and quantitative reasoning in the original question.
- Determine the key variables (e.g., revenue, profit, growth rate, interest) and their relationships.
- Maintain the original question’s structure and complexity.
#### Step 2: Transform and Adapt
- Objective: Create a new FinQA-style question while modifying numerical values and conditions.
- Guidelines:
- Change financial figures, constraints, or business conditions to create a unique question.
- Ensure the transformation maintains financial realism (e.g., realistic market trends, interest rates).
- Retain the original reasoning and computational steps while introducing fresh data points.
#### Step 3: Generate the New FinQA Question
- Objective: Output an original, transformed FinQA question without providing an answer or solution.
- Guidelines:
- Ensure the new question aligns with FinQA’s format and complexity.
- Maintain clarity and well-defined financial relationships.
### Response Rule
- **Generate only the "Transformed FinQA Question" for the given example without including any answer, explanation, or solution.**
### Output Format
#### Transformed FinQA Question: [Write your transformed FinQA question here.]
----
#### Task
#### Original FinQA Question: Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: our international networks segment owns and operates the following television networks , which reached the following number of subscribers via pay television services as of december 31 , 2013 : global networks international subscribers ( millions ) regional networks international subscribers ( millions ) .
|global networks discovery channel|internationalsubscribers ( millions ) 271|regional networks discovery kids|internationalsubscribers ( millions ) 76|
|animal planet|200|sbs nordic ( a )|28|
|tlc real time and travel & living|162|dmax ( b )|16|
|discovery science|81|discovery history|14|
|investigation discovery|74|shed|12|
|discovery home & health|64|discovery en espanol ( u.s. )|5|
|turbo|52|discovery familia ( u.s. )|4|
|discovery world|23|gxt|4|
( a ) number of subscribers corresponds to the collective sum of the total number of subscribers to each of the sbs nordic broadcast networks in sweden , norway , and denmark subject to retransmission agreements with pay television providers . ( b ) number of subscribers corresponds to dmax pay television networks in the u.k. , austria , switzerland and ireland . our international networks segment also owns and operates free-to-air television networks which reached 285 million cumulative viewers in europe and the middle east as of december 31 , 2013 . our free-to-air networks include dmax , fatafeat , quest , real time , giallo , frisbee , focus and k2 . similar to u.s . networks , the primary sources of revenue for international networks are fees charged to operators who distribute our networks , which primarily include cable and dth satellite service providers , and advertising sold on our television networks . international television markets vary in their stages of development . some markets , such as the u.k. , are more advanced digital television markets , while others remain in the analog environment with varying degrees of investment from operators to expand channel capacity or convert to digital technologies . common practice in some markets results in long-term contractual distribution relationships , while customers in other markets renew contracts annually . distribution revenue for our international networks segment is largely dependent on the number of subscribers that receive our networks or content , the rates negotiated in the agreements , and the market demand for the content that we provide . advertising revenue is dependent upon a number of factors including the development of pay and free-to-air television markets , the number of subscribers to and viewers of our channels , viewership demographics , the popularity of our programming , and our ability to sell commercial time over a group of channels . in certain markets , our advertising sales business operates with in-house sales teams , while we rely on external sales representation services in other markets . in developing television markets , we expect that advertising revenue growth will result from continued subscriber and viewership growth , our localization strategy , and the shift of advertising spending from traditional analog networks to channels in the multi-channel environment . in relatively mature markets , such as western europe , growth in advertising revenue will come from increasing viewership and pricing of advertising on our existing television networks and the launching of new services , both organic and through acquisitions . during 2013 , distribution , advertising and other revenues were 50% ( 50 % ) , 47% ( 47 % ) and 3% ( 3 % ) , respectively , of total net revenues for this segment . on january 21 , 2014 , we entered into an agreement with tf1 to acquire a controlling interest in eurosport international ( "eurosport" ) , a leading pan-european sports media platform , by increasing our ownership stake from 20% ( 20 % ) to 51% ( 51 % ) for cash of approximately 20ac253 million ( $ 343 million ) subject to working capital adjustments . due to regulatory constraints the acquisition initially excludes eurosport france , a subsidiary of eurosport . we will retain a 20% ( 20 % ) equity interest in eurosport france and a commitment to acquire another 31% ( 31 % ) ownership interest beginning 2015 , contingent upon resolution of all regulatory matters . the flagship eurosport network focuses on regionally popular sports such as tennis , skiing , cycling and motor sports and reaches 133 million homes across 54 countries in 20 languages . eurosport 2019s brands and platforms also include eurosport hd ( high definition simulcast ) , eurosport 2 , eurosport 2 hd ( high definition simulcast ) , eurosport asia-pacific , and eurosportnews . the acquisition is intended to increase the growth of eurosport and enhance our pay television offerings in europe . tf1 will have the right to put the entirety of its remaining 49% ( 49 % ) non-controlling interest to us for approximately two and a half years after completion of this acquisition . the put has a floor value equal to the fair value at the acquisition date if exercised in the 90 day period beginning on july 1 , 2015 and is subsequently priced at fair value if exercised in the 90 day period beginning on july 1 , 2016 . we expect the acquisition to close in the second quarter of 2014 subject to obtaining necessary regulatory approvals. .
Question: as of january 21 , 2014 , what was the implied total value of eurosport international based on the price paid for the increased ownership , in us$ millions ? |
Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: 13 . rentals and leases the company leases sales and administrative office facilities , distribution centers , research and manufacturing facilities , as well as vehicles and other equipment under operating leases . total rental expense under the company 2019s operating leases was $ 239 million in 2017 and $ 221 million in both 2016 and 2015 . as of december 31 , 2017 , identifiable future minimum payments with non-cancelable terms in excess of one year were : ( millions ) .
|2018|$ 131|
|2019|115|
|2020|96|
|2021|86|
|2022|74|
|thereafter|115|
|total|$ 617|
the company enters into operating leases for vehicles whose non-cancelable terms are one year or less in duration with month-to-month renewal options . these leases have been excluded from the table above . the company estimates payments under such leases will approximate $ 62 million in 2018 . these vehicle leases have guaranteed residual values that have historically been satisfied by the proceeds on the sale of the vehicles . 14 . research and development expenditures research expenditures that relate to the development of new products and processes , including significant improvements and refinements to existing products , are expensed as incurred . such costs were $ 201 million in 2017 , $ 189 million in 2016 and $ 191 million in 2015 . the company did not participate in any material customer sponsored research during 2017 , 2016 or 2015 . 15 . commitments and contingencies the company is subject to various claims and contingencies related to , among other things , workers 2019 compensation , general liability ( including product liability ) , automobile claims , health care claims , environmental matters and lawsuits . the company is also subject to various claims and contingencies related to income taxes , which are discussed in note 12 . the company also has contractual obligations including lease commitments , which are discussed in note 13 . the company records liabilities where a contingent loss is probable and can be reasonably estimated . if the reasonable estimate of a probable loss is a range , the company records the most probable estimate of the loss or the minimum amount when no amount within the range is a better estimate than any other amount . the company discloses a contingent liability even if the liability is not probable or the amount is not estimable , or both , if there is a reasonable possibility that a material loss may have been incurred . insurance globally , the company has insurance policies with varying deductibility levels for property and casualty losses . the company is insured for losses in excess of these deductibles , subject to policy terms and conditions and has recorded both a liability and an offsetting receivable for amounts in excess of these deductibles . the company is self-insured for health care claims for eligible participating employees , subject to certain deductibles and limitations . the company determines its liabilities for claims on an actuarial basis . litigation and environmental matters the company and certain subsidiaries are party to various lawsuits , claims and environmental actions that have arisen in the ordinary course of business . these include from time to time antitrust , commercial , patent infringement , product liability and wage hour lawsuits , as well as possible obligations to investigate and mitigate the effects on the environment of the disposal or release of certain chemical substances at various sites , such as superfund sites and other operating or closed facilities . the company has established accruals for certain lawsuits , claims and environmental matters . the company currently believes that there is not a reasonably possible risk of material loss in excess of the amounts accrued related to these legal matters . because litigation is inherently uncertain , and unfavorable rulings or developments could occur , there can be no certainty that the company may not ultimately incur charges in excess of recorded liabilities . a future adverse ruling , settlement or unfavorable development could result in future charges that could have a material adverse effect on the company 2019s results of operations or cash flows in the period in which they are recorded . the company currently believes that such future charges related to suits and legal claims , if any , would not have a material adverse effect on the company 2019s consolidated financial position . environmental matters the company is currently participating in environmental assessments and remediation at approximately 45 locations , the majority of which are in the u.s. , and environmental liabilities have been accrued reflecting management 2019s best estimate of future costs . potential insurance reimbursements are not anticipated in the company 2019s accruals for environmental liabilities. .
Question: what is the percentage change in the r&d expenses from 2015 to 2016? | -0.01047 | ### Transformed FinQA Question Generation Instructions
#### Step 1: Analyze and Understand the Original FinQA Question
- Objective: Use the given FinQA question to generate a new, logically similar but numerically different question.
- Guidelines:
- Identify the financial concepts and quantitative reasoning in the original question.
- Determine the key variables (e.g., revenue, profit, growth rate, interest) and their relationships.
- Maintain the original question’s structure and complexity.
#### Step 2: Transform and Adapt
- Objective: Create a new FinQA-style question while modifying numerical values and conditions.
- Guidelines:
- Change financial figures, constraints, or business conditions to create a unique question.
- Ensure the transformation maintains financial realism (e.g., realistic market trends, interest rates).
- Retain the original reasoning and computational steps while introducing fresh data points.
#### Step 3: Generate the New FinQA Question
- Objective: Output an original, transformed FinQA question without providing an answer or solution.
- Guidelines:
- Ensure the new question aligns with FinQA’s format and complexity.
- Maintain clarity and well-defined financial relationships.
### Response Rule
- **Generate only the "Transformed FinQA Question" for the given example without including any answer, explanation, or solution.**
### Output Format
#### Transformed FinQA Question: [Write your transformed FinQA question here.]
----
#### Task
#### Original FinQA Question: Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: 13 . rentals and leases the company leases sales and administrative office facilities , distribution centers , research and manufacturing facilities , as well as vehicles and other equipment under operating leases . total rental expense under the company 2019s operating leases was $ 239 million in 2017 and $ 221 million in both 2016 and 2015 . as of december 31 , 2017 , identifiable future minimum payments with non-cancelable terms in excess of one year were : ( millions ) .
|2018|$ 131|
|2019|115|
|2020|96|
|2021|86|
|2022|74|
|thereafter|115|
|total|$ 617|
the company enters into operating leases for vehicles whose non-cancelable terms are one year or less in duration with month-to-month renewal options . these leases have been excluded from the table above . the company estimates payments under such leases will approximate $ 62 million in 2018 . these vehicle leases have guaranteed residual values that have historically been satisfied by the proceeds on the sale of the vehicles . 14 . research and development expenditures research expenditures that relate to the development of new products and processes , including significant improvements and refinements to existing products , are expensed as incurred . such costs were $ 201 million in 2017 , $ 189 million in 2016 and $ 191 million in 2015 . the company did not participate in any material customer sponsored research during 2017 , 2016 or 2015 . 15 . commitments and contingencies the company is subject to various claims and contingencies related to , among other things , workers 2019 compensation , general liability ( including product liability ) , automobile claims , health care claims , environmental matters and lawsuits . the company is also subject to various claims and contingencies related to income taxes , which are discussed in note 12 . the company also has contractual obligations including lease commitments , which are discussed in note 13 . the company records liabilities where a contingent loss is probable and can be reasonably estimated . if the reasonable estimate of a probable loss is a range , the company records the most probable estimate of the loss or the minimum amount when no amount within the range is a better estimate than any other amount . the company discloses a contingent liability even if the liability is not probable or the amount is not estimable , or both , if there is a reasonable possibility that a material loss may have been incurred . insurance globally , the company has insurance policies with varying deductibility levels for property and casualty losses . the company is insured for losses in excess of these deductibles , subject to policy terms and conditions and has recorded both a liability and an offsetting receivable for amounts in excess of these deductibles . the company is self-insured for health care claims for eligible participating employees , subject to certain deductibles and limitations . the company determines its liabilities for claims on an actuarial basis . litigation and environmental matters the company and certain subsidiaries are party to various lawsuits , claims and environmental actions that have arisen in the ordinary course of business . these include from time to time antitrust , commercial , patent infringement , product liability and wage hour lawsuits , as well as possible obligations to investigate and mitigate the effects on the environment of the disposal or release of certain chemical substances at various sites , such as superfund sites and other operating or closed facilities . the company has established accruals for certain lawsuits , claims and environmental matters . the company currently believes that there is not a reasonably possible risk of material loss in excess of the amounts accrued related to these legal matters . because litigation is inherently uncertain , and unfavorable rulings or developments could occur , there can be no certainty that the company may not ultimately incur charges in excess of recorded liabilities . a future adverse ruling , settlement or unfavorable development could result in future charges that could have a material adverse effect on the company 2019s results of operations or cash flows in the period in which they are recorded . the company currently believes that such future charges related to suits and legal claims , if any , would not have a material adverse effect on the company 2019s consolidated financial position . environmental matters the company is currently participating in environmental assessments and remediation at approximately 45 locations , the majority of which are in the u.s. , and environmental liabilities have been accrued reflecting management 2019s best estimate of future costs . potential insurance reimbursements are not anticipated in the company 2019s accruals for environmental liabilities. .
Question: what is the percentage change in the r&d expenses from 2015 to 2016? |
Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: ( v ) bankruptcy , insolvency , or other similar proceedings , ( vi ) our inability to pay debts , ( vii ) judgment defaults of $ 15 million or more , ( viii ) customary erisa and environmental defaults , ( ix ) actual or asserted invalidity of any material provision of the loan documentation or impairment of a portion of the collateral , ( x ) failure of subordinated indebtedness to be validly and sufficiently subordinated , and ( xi ) a change of control . borrowings under the credit agreement accrue interest at variable rates , which depend on the type ( u.s . dollar or canadian dollar ) and duration of the borrowing , plus an applicable margin rate . the weighted-average interest rates , including the effect of interest rate swap agreements , on borrowings outstanding against our senior secured credit facility at december 31 , 2010 and 2009 were 3.97% ( 3.97 % ) and 4.53% ( 4.53 % ) , respectively . borrowings against the senior secured credit facility totaled $ 590.1 million and $ 595.7 million at december 31 , 2010 and 2009 , respectively , of which $ 50.0 million and $ 7.5 million were classified as current maturities , respectively . we also incur commitment fees on the unused portion of our revolving credit facility ranging from 0.38% ( 0.38 % ) to 0.50% ( 0.50 % ) . as part of the consideration for business acquisitions completed during 2010 , 2009 and 2008 , we issued promissory notes totaling approximately $ 5.5 million , $ 1.2 million and $ 1.6 million , respectively . the notes bear interest at annual rates of 2.0% ( 2.0 % ) to 4.0% ( 4.0 % ) , and interest is payable at maturity or in monthly installments . note 6 . derivative instruments and hedging activities we are exposed to market risks , including the effect of changes in interest rates , foreign currency exchange rates and commodity prices . under our current policies , we use derivatives to manage our exposure to variable interest rates on our credit agreement , but we do not attempt to hedge our foreign currency and commodity price risks . we do not hold or issue derivatives for trading purposes . at december 31 , 2010 , we had interest rate swap agreements in place to hedge a portion of the variable interest rate risk on our variable rate term loans , with the objective of minimizing the impact of interest rate fluctuations and stabilizing cash flows . beginning on the effective dates of the interest rate swap agreements , on a monthly basis through the maturity date , we have paid and will pay the fixed interest rate and have received and will receive payment at a variable rate of interest based on the london interbank offered rate ( 201clibor 201d ) on the notional amount . the interest rate swap agreements qualify as cash flow hedges , and we have elected to apply hedge accounting for these swap agreements . as a result , the effective portion of changes in the fair value of the interest rate swap agreements is recorded in other comprehensive income and is reclassified to interest expense when the underlying interest payment has an impact on earnings . the ineffective portion of changes in the fair value of the interest rate swap agreements is reported in interest expense . the following table summarizes the terms of our interest rate swap agreements as of december 31 , 2010: .
|notional amount|effective date|maturity date|fixed interest rate*|
|$ 200000000|april 14 2008|april 14 2011|4.99% ( 4.99 % )|
|$ 250000000|october 14 2010|october 14 2015|3.81% ( 3.81 % )|
|$ 100000000|april 14 2011|october 14 2013|3.34% ( 3.34 % )|
* includes applicable margin of 2.25% ( 2.25 % ) per annum currently in effect under the credit agreement as of december 31 , 2010 , the fair market value of the $ 200 million notional amount swap was a liability of $ 1.4 million , included in other accrued expenses on our consolidated balance sheet . the fair market value of the other swap contracts was an asset of $ 4.8 million , included in other assets on our consolidated balance sheet as of december 31 , 2010 . as of december 31 , 2009 , the fair market value of the interest rate swap contracts was a liability of $ 10.2 million and was included in other accrued expenses ( $ 5.0 million ) and other noncurrent liabilities ( $ 5.2 million ) on our consolidated balance sheet. .
Question: what was the sum of the promissory notes totaling approximately issued as part of the plan business acquisitions from 2008 to 2010 in millions | 8.3 | ### Transformed FinQA Question Generation Instructions
#### Step 1: Analyze and Understand the Original FinQA Question
- Objective: Use the given FinQA question to generate a new, logically similar but numerically different question.
- Guidelines:
- Identify the financial concepts and quantitative reasoning in the original question.
- Determine the key variables (e.g., revenue, profit, growth rate, interest) and their relationships.
- Maintain the original question’s structure and complexity.
#### Step 2: Transform and Adapt
- Objective: Create a new FinQA-style question while modifying numerical values and conditions.
- Guidelines:
- Change financial figures, constraints, or business conditions to create a unique question.
- Ensure the transformation maintains financial realism (e.g., realistic market trends, interest rates).
- Retain the original reasoning and computational steps while introducing fresh data points.
#### Step 3: Generate the New FinQA Question
- Objective: Output an original, transformed FinQA question without providing an answer or solution.
- Guidelines:
- Ensure the new question aligns with FinQA’s format and complexity.
- Maintain clarity and well-defined financial relationships.
### Response Rule
- **Generate only the "Transformed FinQA Question" for the given example without including any answer, explanation, or solution.**
### Output Format
#### Transformed FinQA Question: [Write your transformed FinQA question here.]
----
#### Task
#### Original FinQA Question: Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: ( v ) bankruptcy , insolvency , or other similar proceedings , ( vi ) our inability to pay debts , ( vii ) judgment defaults of $ 15 million or more , ( viii ) customary erisa and environmental defaults , ( ix ) actual or asserted invalidity of any material provision of the loan documentation or impairment of a portion of the collateral , ( x ) failure of subordinated indebtedness to be validly and sufficiently subordinated , and ( xi ) a change of control . borrowings under the credit agreement accrue interest at variable rates , which depend on the type ( u.s . dollar or canadian dollar ) and duration of the borrowing , plus an applicable margin rate . the weighted-average interest rates , including the effect of interest rate swap agreements , on borrowings outstanding against our senior secured credit facility at december 31 , 2010 and 2009 were 3.97% ( 3.97 % ) and 4.53% ( 4.53 % ) , respectively . borrowings against the senior secured credit facility totaled $ 590.1 million and $ 595.7 million at december 31 , 2010 and 2009 , respectively , of which $ 50.0 million and $ 7.5 million were classified as current maturities , respectively . we also incur commitment fees on the unused portion of our revolving credit facility ranging from 0.38% ( 0.38 % ) to 0.50% ( 0.50 % ) . as part of the consideration for business acquisitions completed during 2010 , 2009 and 2008 , we issued promissory notes totaling approximately $ 5.5 million , $ 1.2 million and $ 1.6 million , respectively . the notes bear interest at annual rates of 2.0% ( 2.0 % ) to 4.0% ( 4.0 % ) , and interest is payable at maturity or in monthly installments . note 6 . derivative instruments and hedging activities we are exposed to market risks , including the effect of changes in interest rates , foreign currency exchange rates and commodity prices . under our current policies , we use derivatives to manage our exposure to variable interest rates on our credit agreement , but we do not attempt to hedge our foreign currency and commodity price risks . we do not hold or issue derivatives for trading purposes . at december 31 , 2010 , we had interest rate swap agreements in place to hedge a portion of the variable interest rate risk on our variable rate term loans , with the objective of minimizing the impact of interest rate fluctuations and stabilizing cash flows . beginning on the effective dates of the interest rate swap agreements , on a monthly basis through the maturity date , we have paid and will pay the fixed interest rate and have received and will receive payment at a variable rate of interest based on the london interbank offered rate ( 201clibor 201d ) on the notional amount . the interest rate swap agreements qualify as cash flow hedges , and we have elected to apply hedge accounting for these swap agreements . as a result , the effective portion of changes in the fair value of the interest rate swap agreements is recorded in other comprehensive income and is reclassified to interest expense when the underlying interest payment has an impact on earnings . the ineffective portion of changes in the fair value of the interest rate swap agreements is reported in interest expense . the following table summarizes the terms of our interest rate swap agreements as of december 31 , 2010: .
|notional amount|effective date|maturity date|fixed interest rate*|
|$ 200000000|april 14 2008|april 14 2011|4.99% ( 4.99 % )|
|$ 250000000|october 14 2010|october 14 2015|3.81% ( 3.81 % )|
|$ 100000000|april 14 2011|october 14 2013|3.34% ( 3.34 % )|
* includes applicable margin of 2.25% ( 2.25 % ) per annum currently in effect under the credit agreement as of december 31 , 2010 , the fair market value of the $ 200 million notional amount swap was a liability of $ 1.4 million , included in other accrued expenses on our consolidated balance sheet . the fair market value of the other swap contracts was an asset of $ 4.8 million , included in other assets on our consolidated balance sheet as of december 31 , 2010 . as of december 31 , 2009 , the fair market value of the interest rate swap contracts was a liability of $ 10.2 million and was included in other accrued expenses ( $ 5.0 million ) and other noncurrent liabilities ( $ 5.2 million ) on our consolidated balance sheet. .
Question: what was the sum of the promissory notes totaling approximately issued as part of the plan business acquisitions from 2008 to 2010 in millions |
Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: part i berths at the end of 2011 . there are approximately 10 ships with an estimated 34000 berths that are expected to be placed in service in the north american cruise market between 2012 and 2016 . europe in europe , cruising represents a smaller but growing sector of the vacation industry . it has experienced a compound annual growth rate in cruise guests of approximately 9.6% ( 9.6 % ) from 2007 to 2011 and we believe this market has significant continued growth poten- tial . we estimate that europe was served by 104 ships with approximately 100000 berths at the beginning of 2007 and by 121 ships with approximately 155000 berths at the end of 2011 . there are approximately 10 ships with an estimated 28000 berths that are expected to be placed in service in the european cruise market between 2012 and 2016 . the following table details the growth in the global , north american and european cruise markets in terms of cruise guests and estimated weighted-average berths over the past five years : global cruise guests ( 1 ) weighted-average supply of berths marketed globally ( 1 ) north american cruise guests ( 2 ) weighted-average supply of berths marketed in north america ( 1 ) european cruise guests ( 3 ) weighted-average supply of berths marketed in europe ( 1 ) .
|year|global cruiseguests ( 1 )|weighted-averagesupplyofberthsmarketedglobally ( 1 )|northamericancruiseguests ( 2 )|weighted-average supply ofberths marketedin northamerica ( 1 )|europeancruiseguests|weighted-averagesupply ofberthsmarketed ineurope ( 1 )|
|2007|16586000|327000|10247000|212000|4080000|105000|
|2008|17184000|347000|10093000|219000|4500000|120000|
|2009|17340000|363000|10198000|222000|5000000|131000|
|2010|18800000|391000|10781000|232000|5540000|143000|
|2011|20227000|412000|11625000|245000|5894000|149000|
( 1 ) source : our estimates of the number of global cruise guests , and the weighted-average supply of berths marketed globally , in north america and europe are based on a combination of data that we obtain from various publicly available cruise industry trade information sources including seatrade insider and cruise line international association . in addition , our estimates incorporate our own statistical analysis utilizing the same publicly available cruise industry data as a base . ( 2 ) source : cruise line international association based on cruise guests carried for at least two consecutive nights for years 2007 through 2010 . year 2011 amounts represent our estimates ( see number 1 above ) . ( 3 ) source : european cruise council for years 2007 through 2010 . year 2011 amounts represent our estimates ( see number 1 above ) . other markets in addition to expected industry growth in north america and europe as discussed above , we expect the asia/pacific region to demonstrate an even higher growth rate in the near term , although it will continue to represent a relatively small sector compared to north america and europe . we compete with a number of cruise lines ; however , our principal competitors are carnival corporation & plc , which owns , among others , aida cruises , carnival cruise lines , costa cruises , cunard line , holland america line , iberocruceros , p&o cruises and princess cruises ; disney cruise line ; msc cruises ; norwegian cruise line and oceania cruises . cruise lines compete with other vacation alternatives such as land-based resort hotels and sightseeing destinations for consum- ers 2019 leisure time . demand for such activities is influ- enced by political and general economic conditions . companies within the vacation market are dependent on consumer discretionary spending . operating strategies our principal operating strategies are to : and employees and protect the environment in which our vessels and organization operate , to better serve our global guest base and grow our business , order to enhance our revenues while continuing to expand and diversify our guest mix through interna- tional guest sourcing , and ensure adequate cash and liquidity , with the overall goal of maximizing our return on invested capital and long-term shareholder value , our brands throughout the world , revitalization of existing ships and the transfer of key innovations across each brand , while expanding our fleet with the new state-of-the-art cruise ships recently delivered and on order , by deploying them into those markets and itineraries that provide opportunities to optimize returns , while continuing our focus on existing key markets , support ongoing operations and initiatives , and the principal industry distribution channel , while enhancing our consumer outreach programs. .
Question: what was the total percentage increase from 2007 to 2011 in the number of berths? | 55.0 | ### Transformed FinQA Question Generation Instructions
#### Step 1: Analyze and Understand the Original FinQA Question
- Objective: Use the given FinQA question to generate a new, logically similar but numerically different question.
- Guidelines:
- Identify the financial concepts and quantitative reasoning in the original question.
- Determine the key variables (e.g., revenue, profit, growth rate, interest) and their relationships.
- Maintain the original question’s structure and complexity.
#### Step 2: Transform and Adapt
- Objective: Create a new FinQA-style question while modifying numerical values and conditions.
- Guidelines:
- Change financial figures, constraints, or business conditions to create a unique question.
- Ensure the transformation maintains financial realism (e.g., realistic market trends, interest rates).
- Retain the original reasoning and computational steps while introducing fresh data points.
#### Step 3: Generate the New FinQA Question
- Objective: Output an original, transformed FinQA question without providing an answer or solution.
- Guidelines:
- Ensure the new question aligns with FinQA’s format and complexity.
- Maintain clarity and well-defined financial relationships.
### Response Rule
- **Generate only the "Transformed FinQA Question" for the given example without including any answer, explanation, or solution.**
### Output Format
#### Transformed FinQA Question: [Write your transformed FinQA question here.]
----
#### Task
#### Original FinQA Question: Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: part i berths at the end of 2011 . there are approximately 10 ships with an estimated 34000 berths that are expected to be placed in service in the north american cruise market between 2012 and 2016 . europe in europe , cruising represents a smaller but growing sector of the vacation industry . it has experienced a compound annual growth rate in cruise guests of approximately 9.6% ( 9.6 % ) from 2007 to 2011 and we believe this market has significant continued growth poten- tial . we estimate that europe was served by 104 ships with approximately 100000 berths at the beginning of 2007 and by 121 ships with approximately 155000 berths at the end of 2011 . there are approximately 10 ships with an estimated 28000 berths that are expected to be placed in service in the european cruise market between 2012 and 2016 . the following table details the growth in the global , north american and european cruise markets in terms of cruise guests and estimated weighted-average berths over the past five years : global cruise guests ( 1 ) weighted-average supply of berths marketed globally ( 1 ) north american cruise guests ( 2 ) weighted-average supply of berths marketed in north america ( 1 ) european cruise guests ( 3 ) weighted-average supply of berths marketed in europe ( 1 ) .
|year|global cruiseguests ( 1 )|weighted-averagesupplyofberthsmarketedglobally ( 1 )|northamericancruiseguests ( 2 )|weighted-average supply ofberths marketedin northamerica ( 1 )|europeancruiseguests|weighted-averagesupply ofberthsmarketed ineurope ( 1 )|
|2007|16586000|327000|10247000|212000|4080000|105000|
|2008|17184000|347000|10093000|219000|4500000|120000|
|2009|17340000|363000|10198000|222000|5000000|131000|
|2010|18800000|391000|10781000|232000|5540000|143000|
|2011|20227000|412000|11625000|245000|5894000|149000|
( 1 ) source : our estimates of the number of global cruise guests , and the weighted-average supply of berths marketed globally , in north america and europe are based on a combination of data that we obtain from various publicly available cruise industry trade information sources including seatrade insider and cruise line international association . in addition , our estimates incorporate our own statistical analysis utilizing the same publicly available cruise industry data as a base . ( 2 ) source : cruise line international association based on cruise guests carried for at least two consecutive nights for years 2007 through 2010 . year 2011 amounts represent our estimates ( see number 1 above ) . ( 3 ) source : european cruise council for years 2007 through 2010 . year 2011 amounts represent our estimates ( see number 1 above ) . other markets in addition to expected industry growth in north america and europe as discussed above , we expect the asia/pacific region to demonstrate an even higher growth rate in the near term , although it will continue to represent a relatively small sector compared to north america and europe . we compete with a number of cruise lines ; however , our principal competitors are carnival corporation & plc , which owns , among others , aida cruises , carnival cruise lines , costa cruises , cunard line , holland america line , iberocruceros , p&o cruises and princess cruises ; disney cruise line ; msc cruises ; norwegian cruise line and oceania cruises . cruise lines compete with other vacation alternatives such as land-based resort hotels and sightseeing destinations for consum- ers 2019 leisure time . demand for such activities is influ- enced by political and general economic conditions . companies within the vacation market are dependent on consumer discretionary spending . operating strategies our principal operating strategies are to : and employees and protect the environment in which our vessels and organization operate , to better serve our global guest base and grow our business , order to enhance our revenues while continuing to expand and diversify our guest mix through interna- tional guest sourcing , and ensure adequate cash and liquidity , with the overall goal of maximizing our return on invested capital and long-term shareholder value , our brands throughout the world , revitalization of existing ships and the transfer of key innovations across each brand , while expanding our fleet with the new state-of-the-art cruise ships recently delivered and on order , by deploying them into those markets and itineraries that provide opportunities to optimize returns , while continuing our focus on existing key markets , support ongoing operations and initiatives , and the principal industry distribution channel , while enhancing our consumer outreach programs. .
Question: what was the total percentage increase from 2007 to 2011 in the number of berths? |
Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: the following tables present a reconciliation of the beginning and ending balances of the fair value measurements using significant unobservable inputs ( level 3 ) for 2017 and 2016 , respectively: .
||level 3|
|balance as of january 1 2017|$ 140|
|actual return on assets|2|
|purchases issuances and settlements net|136|
|balance as of december 31 2017|$ 278|
purchases , issuances and settlements , net . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ( 4 ) balance as of december 31 , 2016 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 140 the company 2019s postretirement benefit plans have different levels of funded status and the assets are held under various trusts . the investments and risk mitigation strategies for the plans are tailored specifically for each trust . in setting new strategic asset mixes , consideration is given to the likelihood that the selected asset allocation will effectively fund the projected plan liabilities and meet the risk tolerance criteria of the company . the company periodically updates the long-term , strategic asset allocations for these plans through asset liability studies and uses various analytics to determine the optimal asset allocation . considerations include plan liability characteristics , liquidity needs , funding requirements , expected rates of return and the distribution of returns . strategies to address the goal of ensuring sufficient assets to pay benefits include target allocations to a broad array of asset classes and , within asset classes , strategies are employed to provide adequate returns , diversification and liquidity . in 2012 , the company implemented a de-risking strategy for the american water pension plan after conducting an asset-liability study to reduce the volatility of the funded status of the plan . as part of the de-risking strategy , the company revised the asset allocations to increase the matching characteristics of fixed-income assets relative to liabilities . the fixed income portion of the portfolio was designed to match the bond-like and long-dated nature of the postretirement liabilities . in 2017 , the company further increased its exposure to liability-driven investing and increased its fixed-income allocation to 50% ( 50 % ) , up from 40% ( 40 % ) , in an effort to further decrease the funded status volatility of the plan and hedge the portfolio from movements in interest rates . in 2012 , the company also implemented a de-risking strategy for the medical bargaining trust within the plan to minimize volatility . in 2017 , the company conducted a new asset-liability study that indicated medical trend inflation that outpaced the consumer price index by more than 2% ( 2 % ) for the last 20 years . given continuously rising medical costs , the company decided to increase the equity exposure of the portfolio to 30% ( 30 % ) , up from 20% ( 20 % ) , while reducing the fixed-income portion of the portfolio from 80% ( 80 % ) to 70% ( 70 % ) . the company also conducted an asset-liability study for the post-retirement non-bargaining medical plan . its allocation was adjusted to make it more conservative , reducing the equity allocation from 70% ( 70 % ) to 60% ( 60 % ) and increasing the fixed- income allocation from 30% ( 30 % ) to 40% ( 40 % ) . the post-retirement medical non-bargaining plan 2019s equity allocation was reduced due to the cap on benefits for some non-union participants and resultant reduction in the plan 2019s liabilities . these changes will take place in 2018 . the company engages third party investment managers for all invested assets . managers are not permitted to invest outside of the asset class ( e.g . fixed income , equity , alternatives ) or strategy for which they have been appointed . investment management agreements and recurring performance and attribution analysis are used as tools to ensure investment managers invest solely within the investment strategy they have been provided . futures and options may be used to adjust portfolio duration to align with a plan 2019s targeted investment policy. .
Question: what was the actual return on assets as a percentage of beginning 2017 balance? | 0.01429 | ### Transformed FinQA Question Generation Instructions
#### Step 1: Analyze and Understand the Original FinQA Question
- Objective: Use the given FinQA question to generate a new, logically similar but numerically different question.
- Guidelines:
- Identify the financial concepts and quantitative reasoning in the original question.
- Determine the key variables (e.g., revenue, profit, growth rate, interest) and their relationships.
- Maintain the original question’s structure and complexity.
#### Step 2: Transform and Adapt
- Objective: Create a new FinQA-style question while modifying numerical values and conditions.
- Guidelines:
- Change financial figures, constraints, or business conditions to create a unique question.
- Ensure the transformation maintains financial realism (e.g., realistic market trends, interest rates).
- Retain the original reasoning and computational steps while introducing fresh data points.
#### Step 3: Generate the New FinQA Question
- Objective: Output an original, transformed FinQA question without providing an answer or solution.
- Guidelines:
- Ensure the new question aligns with FinQA’s format and complexity.
- Maintain clarity and well-defined financial relationships.
### Response Rule
- **Generate only the "Transformed FinQA Question" for the given example without including any answer, explanation, or solution.**
### Output Format
#### Transformed FinQA Question: [Write your transformed FinQA question here.]
----
#### Task
#### Original FinQA Question: Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: the following tables present a reconciliation of the beginning and ending balances of the fair value measurements using significant unobservable inputs ( level 3 ) for 2017 and 2016 , respectively: .
||level 3|
|balance as of january 1 2017|$ 140|
|actual return on assets|2|
|purchases issuances and settlements net|136|
|balance as of december 31 2017|$ 278|
purchases , issuances and settlements , net . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ( 4 ) balance as of december 31 , 2016 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 140 the company 2019s postretirement benefit plans have different levels of funded status and the assets are held under various trusts . the investments and risk mitigation strategies for the plans are tailored specifically for each trust . in setting new strategic asset mixes , consideration is given to the likelihood that the selected asset allocation will effectively fund the projected plan liabilities and meet the risk tolerance criteria of the company . the company periodically updates the long-term , strategic asset allocations for these plans through asset liability studies and uses various analytics to determine the optimal asset allocation . considerations include plan liability characteristics , liquidity needs , funding requirements , expected rates of return and the distribution of returns . strategies to address the goal of ensuring sufficient assets to pay benefits include target allocations to a broad array of asset classes and , within asset classes , strategies are employed to provide adequate returns , diversification and liquidity . in 2012 , the company implemented a de-risking strategy for the american water pension plan after conducting an asset-liability study to reduce the volatility of the funded status of the plan . as part of the de-risking strategy , the company revised the asset allocations to increase the matching characteristics of fixed-income assets relative to liabilities . the fixed income portion of the portfolio was designed to match the bond-like and long-dated nature of the postretirement liabilities . in 2017 , the company further increased its exposure to liability-driven investing and increased its fixed-income allocation to 50% ( 50 % ) , up from 40% ( 40 % ) , in an effort to further decrease the funded status volatility of the plan and hedge the portfolio from movements in interest rates . in 2012 , the company also implemented a de-risking strategy for the medical bargaining trust within the plan to minimize volatility . in 2017 , the company conducted a new asset-liability study that indicated medical trend inflation that outpaced the consumer price index by more than 2% ( 2 % ) for the last 20 years . given continuously rising medical costs , the company decided to increase the equity exposure of the portfolio to 30% ( 30 % ) , up from 20% ( 20 % ) , while reducing the fixed-income portion of the portfolio from 80% ( 80 % ) to 70% ( 70 % ) . the company also conducted an asset-liability study for the post-retirement non-bargaining medical plan . its allocation was adjusted to make it more conservative , reducing the equity allocation from 70% ( 70 % ) to 60% ( 60 % ) and increasing the fixed- income allocation from 30% ( 30 % ) to 40% ( 40 % ) . the post-retirement medical non-bargaining plan 2019s equity allocation was reduced due to the cap on benefits for some non-union participants and resultant reduction in the plan 2019s liabilities . these changes will take place in 2018 . the company engages third party investment managers for all invested assets . managers are not permitted to invest outside of the asset class ( e.g . fixed income , equity , alternatives ) or strategy for which they have been appointed . investment management agreements and recurring performance and attribution analysis are used as tools to ensure investment managers invest solely within the investment strategy they have been provided . futures and options may be used to adjust portfolio duration to align with a plan 2019s targeted investment policy. .
Question: what was the actual return on assets as a percentage of beginning 2017 balance? |
Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: management 2019s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations 2013 ( continued ) ( amounts in millions , except per share amounts ) operating income increased during 2017 when compared to 2016 , comprised of a decrease in revenue of $ 42.1 , as discussed above , a decrease in salaries and related expenses of $ 28.0 and a decrease in office and general expenses of $ 16.9 . the decrease in salaries and related expenses was primarily due to lower discretionary bonuses and incentive expense as well as a decrease in base salaries , benefits and tax . the decrease in office and general expenses was primarily due to decreases in adjustments to contingent acquisition obligations , as compared to the prior year . operating income increased during 2016 when compared to 2015 due to an increase in revenue of $ 58.8 , as discussed above , and a decrease in office and general expenses of $ 3.7 , partially offset by an increase in salaries and related expenses of $ 38.8 . the increase in salaries and related expenses was attributable to an increase in base salaries , benefits and tax primarily due to increases in our workforce to support business growth over the last twelve months . the decrease in office and general expenses was primarily due to lower production expenses related to pass-through costs , which are also reflected in revenue , for certain projects in which we acted as principal that decreased in size or did not recur during the current year . corporate and other certain corporate and other charges are reported as a separate line item within total segment operating income and include corporate office expenses , as well as shared service center and certain other centrally managed expenses that are not fully allocated to operating divisions . salaries and related expenses include salaries , long-term incentives , annual bonuses and other miscellaneous benefits for corporate office employees . office and general expenses primarily include professional fees related to internal control compliance , financial statement audits and legal , information technology and other consulting services that are engaged and managed through the corporate office . office and general expenses also include rental expense and depreciation of leasehold improvements for properties occupied by corporate office employees . a portion of centrally managed expenses are allocated to operating divisions based on a formula that uses the planned revenues of each of the operating units . amounts allocated also include specific charges for information technology-related projects , which are allocated based on utilization . corporate and other expenses decreased during 2017 by $ 20.6 to $ 126.6 compared to 2016 , primarily due to lower annual incentive expense . corporate and other expenses increased during 2016 by $ 5.4 to $ 147.2 compared to 2015 . liquidity and capital resources cash flow overview the following tables summarize key financial data relating to our liquidity , capital resources and uses of capital. .
|cash flow data|years ended december 31 , 2017|years ended december 31 , 2016|years ended december 31 , 2015|
|net income adjusted to reconcile to net cash provided by operating activities1|$ 887.3|$ 1023.2|$ 848.8|
|net cash used in working capital2|-29.9 ( 29.9 )|-414.9 ( 414.9 )|-99.9 ( 99.9 )|
|changes in other non-current assets and liabilities|24.4|-95.5 ( 95.5 )|-60.4 ( 60.4 )|
|net cash provided by operating activities|$ 881.8|$ 512.8|$ 688.5|
|net cash used in investing activities|-196.2 ( 196.2 )|-263.9 ( 263.9 )|-199.7 ( 199.7 )|
|net cash used in financing activities|-1004.9 ( 1004.9 )|-666.4 ( 666.4 )|-490.9 ( 490.9 )|
1 reflects net income adjusted primarily for depreciation and amortization of fixed assets and intangible assets , amortization of restricted stock and other non-cash compensation , net losses on sales of businesses and deferred income taxes . 2 reflects changes in accounts receivable , expenditures billable to clients , other current assets , accounts payable and accrued liabilities . operating activities due to the seasonality of our business , we typically use cash from working capital in the first nine months of a year , with the largest impact in the first quarter , and generate cash from working capital in the fourth quarter , driven by the seasonally strong media spending by our clients . quarterly and annual working capital results are impacted by the fluctuating annual media spending budgets of our clients as well as their changing media spending patterns throughout each year across various countries. .
Question: what was the total amount of corporate and other expenses from 2015-2017? | 415.6 | ### Transformed FinQA Question Generation Instructions
#### Step 1: Analyze and Understand the Original FinQA Question
- Objective: Use the given FinQA question to generate a new, logically similar but numerically different question.
- Guidelines:
- Identify the financial concepts and quantitative reasoning in the original question.
- Determine the key variables (e.g., revenue, profit, growth rate, interest) and their relationships.
- Maintain the original question’s structure and complexity.
#### Step 2: Transform and Adapt
- Objective: Create a new FinQA-style question while modifying numerical values and conditions.
- Guidelines:
- Change financial figures, constraints, or business conditions to create a unique question.
- Ensure the transformation maintains financial realism (e.g., realistic market trends, interest rates).
- Retain the original reasoning and computational steps while introducing fresh data points.
#### Step 3: Generate the New FinQA Question
- Objective: Output an original, transformed FinQA question without providing an answer or solution.
- Guidelines:
- Ensure the new question aligns with FinQA’s format and complexity.
- Maintain clarity and well-defined financial relationships.
### Response Rule
- **Generate only the "Transformed FinQA Question" for the given example without including any answer, explanation, or solution.**
### Output Format
#### Transformed FinQA Question: [Write your transformed FinQA question here.]
----
#### Task
#### Original FinQA Question: Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: management 2019s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations 2013 ( continued ) ( amounts in millions , except per share amounts ) operating income increased during 2017 when compared to 2016 , comprised of a decrease in revenue of $ 42.1 , as discussed above , a decrease in salaries and related expenses of $ 28.0 and a decrease in office and general expenses of $ 16.9 . the decrease in salaries and related expenses was primarily due to lower discretionary bonuses and incentive expense as well as a decrease in base salaries , benefits and tax . the decrease in office and general expenses was primarily due to decreases in adjustments to contingent acquisition obligations , as compared to the prior year . operating income increased during 2016 when compared to 2015 due to an increase in revenue of $ 58.8 , as discussed above , and a decrease in office and general expenses of $ 3.7 , partially offset by an increase in salaries and related expenses of $ 38.8 . the increase in salaries and related expenses was attributable to an increase in base salaries , benefits and tax primarily due to increases in our workforce to support business growth over the last twelve months . the decrease in office and general expenses was primarily due to lower production expenses related to pass-through costs , which are also reflected in revenue , for certain projects in which we acted as principal that decreased in size or did not recur during the current year . corporate and other certain corporate and other charges are reported as a separate line item within total segment operating income and include corporate office expenses , as well as shared service center and certain other centrally managed expenses that are not fully allocated to operating divisions . salaries and related expenses include salaries , long-term incentives , annual bonuses and other miscellaneous benefits for corporate office employees . office and general expenses primarily include professional fees related to internal control compliance , financial statement audits and legal , information technology and other consulting services that are engaged and managed through the corporate office . office and general expenses also include rental expense and depreciation of leasehold improvements for properties occupied by corporate office employees . a portion of centrally managed expenses are allocated to operating divisions based on a formula that uses the planned revenues of each of the operating units . amounts allocated also include specific charges for information technology-related projects , which are allocated based on utilization . corporate and other expenses decreased during 2017 by $ 20.6 to $ 126.6 compared to 2016 , primarily due to lower annual incentive expense . corporate and other expenses increased during 2016 by $ 5.4 to $ 147.2 compared to 2015 . liquidity and capital resources cash flow overview the following tables summarize key financial data relating to our liquidity , capital resources and uses of capital. .
|cash flow data|years ended december 31 , 2017|years ended december 31 , 2016|years ended december 31 , 2015|
|net income adjusted to reconcile to net cash provided by operating activities1|$ 887.3|$ 1023.2|$ 848.8|
|net cash used in working capital2|-29.9 ( 29.9 )|-414.9 ( 414.9 )|-99.9 ( 99.9 )|
|changes in other non-current assets and liabilities|24.4|-95.5 ( 95.5 )|-60.4 ( 60.4 )|
|net cash provided by operating activities|$ 881.8|$ 512.8|$ 688.5|
|net cash used in investing activities|-196.2 ( 196.2 )|-263.9 ( 263.9 )|-199.7 ( 199.7 )|
|net cash used in financing activities|-1004.9 ( 1004.9 )|-666.4 ( 666.4 )|-490.9 ( 490.9 )|
1 reflects net income adjusted primarily for depreciation and amortization of fixed assets and intangible assets , amortization of restricted stock and other non-cash compensation , net losses on sales of businesses and deferred income taxes . 2 reflects changes in accounts receivable , expenditures billable to clients , other current assets , accounts payable and accrued liabilities . operating activities due to the seasonality of our business , we typically use cash from working capital in the first nine months of a year , with the largest impact in the first quarter , and generate cash from working capital in the fourth quarter , driven by the seasonally strong media spending by our clients . quarterly and annual working capital results are impacted by the fluctuating annual media spending budgets of our clients as well as their changing media spending patterns throughout each year across various countries. .
Question: what was the total amount of corporate and other expenses from 2015-2017? |
Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: contractual obligations the following table summarizes our significant contractual obligations as of december 28 , 2013: .
|( in millions )|payments due by period total|payments due by period less than1 year|payments due by period 1 20133 years|payments due by period 3 20135 years|payments due by period more than5 years|
|operating lease obligations|$ 870|$ 208|$ 298|$ 166|$ 198|
|capital purchase obligations1|5503|5375|125|2014|3|
|other purchase obligations and commitments2|1859|772|744|307|36|
|long-term debt obligations3|22372|429|2360|3761|15822|
|other long-term liabilities4 5|1496|569|663|144|120|
|total6|$ 32100|$ 7353|$ 4190|$ 4378|$ 16179|
capital purchase obligations1 5503 5375 125 2014 3 other purchase obligations and commitments2 1859 772 744 307 36 long-term debt obligations3 22372 429 2360 3761 15822 other long-term liabilities4 , 5 1496 569 663 144 120 total6 $ 32100 $ 7353 $ 4190 $ 4378 $ 16179 1 capital purchase obligations represent commitments for the construction or purchase of property , plant and equipment . they were not recorded as liabilities on our consolidated balance sheets as of december 28 , 2013 , as we had not yet received the related goods or taken title to the property . 2 other purchase obligations and commitments include payments due under various types of licenses and agreements to purchase goods or services , as well as payments due under non-contingent funding obligations . funding obligations include agreements to fund various projects with other companies . 3 amounts represent principal and interest cash payments over the life of the debt obligations , including anticipated interest payments that are not recorded on our consolidated balance sheets . any future settlement of convertible debt would impact our cash payments . 4 we are unable to reliably estimate the timing of future payments related to uncertain tax positions ; therefore , $ 188 million of long-term income taxes payable has been excluded from the preceding table . however , long- term income taxes payable , recorded on our consolidated balance sheets , included these uncertain tax positions , reduced by the associated federal deduction for state taxes and u.s . tax credits arising from non- u.s . income taxes . 5 amounts represent future cash payments to satisfy other long-term liabilities recorded on our consolidated balance sheets , including the short-term portion of these long-term liabilities . expected required contributions to our u.s . and non-u.s . pension plans and other postretirement benefit plans of $ 62 million to be made during 2014 are also included ; however , funding projections beyond 2014 are not practicable to estimate . 6 total excludes contractual obligations already recorded on our consolidated balance sheets as current liabilities except for the short-term portions of long-term debt obligations and other long-term liabilities . contractual obligations for purchases of goods or services , included in other purchase obligations and commitments in the preceding table , include agreements that are enforceable and legally binding on intel and that specify all significant terms , including fixed or minimum quantities to be purchased ; fixed , minimum , or variable price provisions ; and the approximate timing of the transaction . for obligations with cancellation provisions , the amounts included in the preceding table were limited to the non-cancelable portion of the agreement terms or the minimum cancellation fee . we have entered into certain agreements for the purchase of raw materials that specify minimum prices and quantities based on a percentage of the total available market or based on a percentage of our future purchasing requirements . due to the uncertainty of the future market and our future purchasing requirements , as well as the non-binding nature of these agreements , obligations under these agreements are not included in the preceding table . our purchase orders for other products are based on our current manufacturing needs and are fulfilled by our vendors within short time horizons . in addition , some of our purchase orders represent authorizations to purchase rather than binding agreements . table of contents management 2019s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations ( continued ) .
Question: what was the percent of the pension plans and other post retirement benefit plans included in the total other long-term liabilities as of december 28 , 2013 | 0.04144 | ### Transformed FinQA Question Generation Instructions
#### Step 1: Analyze and Understand the Original FinQA Question
- Objective: Use the given FinQA question to generate a new, logically similar but numerically different question.
- Guidelines:
- Identify the financial concepts and quantitative reasoning in the original question.
- Determine the key variables (e.g., revenue, profit, growth rate, interest) and their relationships.
- Maintain the original question’s structure and complexity.
#### Step 2: Transform and Adapt
- Objective: Create a new FinQA-style question while modifying numerical values and conditions.
- Guidelines:
- Change financial figures, constraints, or business conditions to create a unique question.
- Ensure the transformation maintains financial realism (e.g., realistic market trends, interest rates).
- Retain the original reasoning and computational steps while introducing fresh data points.
#### Step 3: Generate the New FinQA Question
- Objective: Output an original, transformed FinQA question without providing an answer or solution.
- Guidelines:
- Ensure the new question aligns with FinQA’s format and complexity.
- Maintain clarity and well-defined financial relationships.
### Response Rule
- **Generate only the "Transformed FinQA Question" for the given example without including any answer, explanation, or solution.**
### Output Format
#### Transformed FinQA Question: [Write your transformed FinQA question here.]
----
#### Task
#### Original FinQA Question: Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: contractual obligations the following table summarizes our significant contractual obligations as of december 28 , 2013: .
|( in millions )|payments due by period total|payments due by period less than1 year|payments due by period 1 20133 years|payments due by period 3 20135 years|payments due by period more than5 years|
|operating lease obligations|$ 870|$ 208|$ 298|$ 166|$ 198|
|capital purchase obligations1|5503|5375|125|2014|3|
|other purchase obligations and commitments2|1859|772|744|307|36|
|long-term debt obligations3|22372|429|2360|3761|15822|
|other long-term liabilities4 5|1496|569|663|144|120|
|total6|$ 32100|$ 7353|$ 4190|$ 4378|$ 16179|
capital purchase obligations1 5503 5375 125 2014 3 other purchase obligations and commitments2 1859 772 744 307 36 long-term debt obligations3 22372 429 2360 3761 15822 other long-term liabilities4 , 5 1496 569 663 144 120 total6 $ 32100 $ 7353 $ 4190 $ 4378 $ 16179 1 capital purchase obligations represent commitments for the construction or purchase of property , plant and equipment . they were not recorded as liabilities on our consolidated balance sheets as of december 28 , 2013 , as we had not yet received the related goods or taken title to the property . 2 other purchase obligations and commitments include payments due under various types of licenses and agreements to purchase goods or services , as well as payments due under non-contingent funding obligations . funding obligations include agreements to fund various projects with other companies . 3 amounts represent principal and interest cash payments over the life of the debt obligations , including anticipated interest payments that are not recorded on our consolidated balance sheets . any future settlement of convertible debt would impact our cash payments . 4 we are unable to reliably estimate the timing of future payments related to uncertain tax positions ; therefore , $ 188 million of long-term income taxes payable has been excluded from the preceding table . however , long- term income taxes payable , recorded on our consolidated balance sheets , included these uncertain tax positions , reduced by the associated federal deduction for state taxes and u.s . tax credits arising from non- u.s . income taxes . 5 amounts represent future cash payments to satisfy other long-term liabilities recorded on our consolidated balance sheets , including the short-term portion of these long-term liabilities . expected required contributions to our u.s . and non-u.s . pension plans and other postretirement benefit plans of $ 62 million to be made during 2014 are also included ; however , funding projections beyond 2014 are not practicable to estimate . 6 total excludes contractual obligations already recorded on our consolidated balance sheets as current liabilities except for the short-term portions of long-term debt obligations and other long-term liabilities . contractual obligations for purchases of goods or services , included in other purchase obligations and commitments in the preceding table , include agreements that are enforceable and legally binding on intel and that specify all significant terms , including fixed or minimum quantities to be purchased ; fixed , minimum , or variable price provisions ; and the approximate timing of the transaction . for obligations with cancellation provisions , the amounts included in the preceding table were limited to the non-cancelable portion of the agreement terms or the minimum cancellation fee . we have entered into certain agreements for the purchase of raw materials that specify minimum prices and quantities based on a percentage of the total available market or based on a percentage of our future purchasing requirements . due to the uncertainty of the future market and our future purchasing requirements , as well as the non-binding nature of these agreements , obligations under these agreements are not included in the preceding table . our purchase orders for other products are based on our current manufacturing needs and are fulfilled by our vendors within short time horizons . in addition , some of our purchase orders represent authorizations to purchase rather than binding agreements . table of contents management 2019s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations ( continued ) .
Question: what was the percent of the pension plans and other post retirement benefit plans included in the total other long-term liabilities as of december 28 , 2013 |
Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: page 71 of 94 notes to consolidated financial statements ball corporation and subsidiaries 16 . shareholders 2019 equity ( continued ) on october 24 , 2007 , ball announced the discontinuance of the company 2019s discount on the reinvestment of dividends associated with the company 2019s dividend reinvestment and voluntary stock purchase plan for non- employee shareholders . the 5 percent discount was discontinued on november 1 , 2007 . accumulated other comprehensive earnings ( loss ) the activity related to accumulated other comprehensive earnings ( loss ) was as follows : ( $ in millions ) foreign currency translation pension and postretirement items , net of tax effective financial derivatives , net of tax accumulated comprehensive earnings ( loss ) .
|( $ in millions )|foreign currency translation|pension and other postretirement items net of tax|effective financial derivatives net of tax|accumulated other comprehensive earnings ( loss )|
|december 31 2004|$ 148.9|$ -126.3 ( 126.3 )|$ 10.6|$ 33.2|
|2005 change|-74.3 ( 74.3 )|-43.6 ( 43.6 )|-16.0 ( 16.0 )|-133.9 ( 133.9 )|
|december 31 2005|74.6|-169.9 ( 169.9 )|-5.4 ( 5.4 )|-100.7 ( 100.7 )|
|2006 change|57.2|55.9|6.0|119.1|
|effect of sfas no . 158 adoption ( a )|2013|-47.9 ( 47.9 )|2013|-47.9 ( 47.9 )|
|december 31 2006|131.8|-161.9 ( 161.9 )|0.6|-29.5 ( 29.5 )|
|2007 change|90.0|57.9|-11.5 ( 11.5 )|136.4|
|december 31 2007|$ 221.8|$ -104.0 ( 104.0 )|$ -10.9 ( 10.9 )|$ 106.9|
( a ) within the company 2019s 2006 annual report , the consolidated statement of changes in shareholders 2019 equity for the year ended december 31 , 2006 , included a transition adjustment of $ 47.9 million , net of tax , related to the adoption of sfas no . 158 , 201cemployers 2019 accounting for defined benefit pension plans and other postretirement plans , an amendment of fasb statements no . 87 , 88 , 106 and 132 ( r ) , 201d as a component of 2006 comprehensive earnings rather than only as an adjustment to accumulated other comprehensive loss . the 2006 amounts have been revised to correct the previous reporting . notwithstanding the 2005 distribution pursuant to the jobs act , management 2019s intention is to indefinitely reinvest foreign earnings . therefore , no taxes have been provided on the foreign currency translation component for any period . the change in the pension and other postretirement items is presented net of related tax expense of $ 31.3 million and $ 2.9 million for 2007 and 2006 , respectively , and a related tax benefit of $ 27.3 million for 2005 . the change in the effective financial derivatives is presented net of related tax benefit of $ 3.2 million for 2007 , related tax expense of $ 5.7 million for 2006 and related tax benefit of $ 10.7 million for 2005 . stock-based compensation programs effective january 1 , 2006 , ball adopted sfas no . 123 ( revised 2004 ) , 201cshare based payment , 201d which is a revision of sfas no . 123 and supersedes apb opinion no . 25 . the new standard establishes accounting standards for transactions in which an entity exchanges its equity instruments for goods or services , including stock option and restricted stock grants . the major differences for ball are that ( 1 ) expense is now recorded in the consolidated statements of earnings for the fair value of new stock option grants and nonvested portions of grants made prior to january 1 , 2006 , and ( 2 ) the company 2019s deposit share program ( discussed below ) is no longer a variable plan that is marked to current market value each month through earnings . upon adoption of sfas no . 123 ( revised 2004 ) , ball has chosen to use the modified prospective transition method and the black-scholes valuation model. .
Question: what was the percentage change in accumulated other comprehensive earnings ( loss ) between 2005 and 2006?\\n | 0.70705 | ### Transformed FinQA Question Generation Instructions
#### Step 1: Analyze and Understand the Original FinQA Question
- Objective: Use the given FinQA question to generate a new, logically similar but numerically different question.
- Guidelines:
- Identify the financial concepts and quantitative reasoning in the original question.
- Determine the key variables (e.g., revenue, profit, growth rate, interest) and their relationships.
- Maintain the original question’s structure and complexity.
#### Step 2: Transform and Adapt
- Objective: Create a new FinQA-style question while modifying numerical values and conditions.
- Guidelines:
- Change financial figures, constraints, or business conditions to create a unique question.
- Ensure the transformation maintains financial realism (e.g., realistic market trends, interest rates).
- Retain the original reasoning and computational steps while introducing fresh data points.
#### Step 3: Generate the New FinQA Question
- Objective: Output an original, transformed FinQA question without providing an answer or solution.
- Guidelines:
- Ensure the new question aligns with FinQA’s format and complexity.
- Maintain clarity and well-defined financial relationships.
### Response Rule
- **Generate only the "Transformed FinQA Question" for the given example without including any answer, explanation, or solution.**
### Output Format
#### Transformed FinQA Question: [Write your transformed FinQA question here.]
----
#### Task
#### Original FinQA Question: Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: page 71 of 94 notes to consolidated financial statements ball corporation and subsidiaries 16 . shareholders 2019 equity ( continued ) on october 24 , 2007 , ball announced the discontinuance of the company 2019s discount on the reinvestment of dividends associated with the company 2019s dividend reinvestment and voluntary stock purchase plan for non- employee shareholders . the 5 percent discount was discontinued on november 1 , 2007 . accumulated other comprehensive earnings ( loss ) the activity related to accumulated other comprehensive earnings ( loss ) was as follows : ( $ in millions ) foreign currency translation pension and postretirement items , net of tax effective financial derivatives , net of tax accumulated comprehensive earnings ( loss ) .
|( $ in millions )|foreign currency translation|pension and other postretirement items net of tax|effective financial derivatives net of tax|accumulated other comprehensive earnings ( loss )|
|december 31 2004|$ 148.9|$ -126.3 ( 126.3 )|$ 10.6|$ 33.2|
|2005 change|-74.3 ( 74.3 )|-43.6 ( 43.6 )|-16.0 ( 16.0 )|-133.9 ( 133.9 )|
|december 31 2005|74.6|-169.9 ( 169.9 )|-5.4 ( 5.4 )|-100.7 ( 100.7 )|
|2006 change|57.2|55.9|6.0|119.1|
|effect of sfas no . 158 adoption ( a )|2013|-47.9 ( 47.9 )|2013|-47.9 ( 47.9 )|
|december 31 2006|131.8|-161.9 ( 161.9 )|0.6|-29.5 ( 29.5 )|
|2007 change|90.0|57.9|-11.5 ( 11.5 )|136.4|
|december 31 2007|$ 221.8|$ -104.0 ( 104.0 )|$ -10.9 ( 10.9 )|$ 106.9|
( a ) within the company 2019s 2006 annual report , the consolidated statement of changes in shareholders 2019 equity for the year ended december 31 , 2006 , included a transition adjustment of $ 47.9 million , net of tax , related to the adoption of sfas no . 158 , 201cemployers 2019 accounting for defined benefit pension plans and other postretirement plans , an amendment of fasb statements no . 87 , 88 , 106 and 132 ( r ) , 201d as a component of 2006 comprehensive earnings rather than only as an adjustment to accumulated other comprehensive loss . the 2006 amounts have been revised to correct the previous reporting . notwithstanding the 2005 distribution pursuant to the jobs act , management 2019s intention is to indefinitely reinvest foreign earnings . therefore , no taxes have been provided on the foreign currency translation component for any period . the change in the pension and other postretirement items is presented net of related tax expense of $ 31.3 million and $ 2.9 million for 2007 and 2006 , respectively , and a related tax benefit of $ 27.3 million for 2005 . the change in the effective financial derivatives is presented net of related tax benefit of $ 3.2 million for 2007 , related tax expense of $ 5.7 million for 2006 and related tax benefit of $ 10.7 million for 2005 . stock-based compensation programs effective january 1 , 2006 , ball adopted sfas no . 123 ( revised 2004 ) , 201cshare based payment , 201d which is a revision of sfas no . 123 and supersedes apb opinion no . 25 . the new standard establishes accounting standards for transactions in which an entity exchanges its equity instruments for goods or services , including stock option and restricted stock grants . the major differences for ball are that ( 1 ) expense is now recorded in the consolidated statements of earnings for the fair value of new stock option grants and nonvested portions of grants made prior to january 1 , 2006 , and ( 2 ) the company 2019s deposit share program ( discussed below ) is no longer a variable plan that is marked to current market value each month through earnings . upon adoption of sfas no . 123 ( revised 2004 ) , ball has chosen to use the modified prospective transition method and the black-scholes valuation model. .
Question: what was the percentage change in accumulated other comprehensive earnings ( loss ) between 2005 and 2006?\\n |
Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: part ii item 5 . market for registrant 2019s common equity , related stockholder matters and issuer purchases of equity securities the following table presents reported quarterly high and low per share sale prices of our class a common stock on the new york stock exchange ( nyse ) for the years 2006 and 2005. .
|2006|high|low|
|quarter ended march 31|$ 32.68|$ 26.66|
|quarter ended june 30|35.75|27.35|
|quarter ended september 30|36.92|29.98|
|quarter ended december 31|38.74|35.21|
|2005|high|low|
|quarter ended march 31|$ 19.28|$ 17.30|
|quarter ended june 30|21.16|16.28|
|quarter ended september 30|25.20|20.70|
|quarter ended december 31|28.33|22.73|
on february 22 , 2007 , the closing price of our class a common stock was $ 40.38 per share as reported on the nyse . as of february 22 , 2007 , we had 419988395 outstanding shares of class a common stock and 623 registered holders . in february 2004 , all outstanding shares of our class b common stock were converted into shares of our class a common stock on a one-for-one basis pursuant to the occurrence of the 201cdodge conversion event 201d as defined in our charter . also in february 2004 , all outstanding shares of class c common stock were converted into shares of class a common stock on a one-for-one basis . in august 2005 , we amended and restated our charter to , among other things , eliminate our class b common stock and class c common stock . dividends we have never paid a dividend on any class of our common stock . we anticipate that we may retain future earnings , if any , to fund the development and growth of our business . the indentures governing our 7.50% ( 7.50 % ) senior notes due 2012 ( 7.50% ( 7.50 % ) notes ) and our 7.125% ( 7.125 % ) senior notes due 2012 ( 7.125% ( 7.125 % ) notes ) may prohibit us from paying dividends to our stockholders unless we satisfy certain financial covenants . our credit facilities and the indentures governing the terms of our debt securities contain covenants that may restrict the ability of our subsidiaries from making to us any direct or indirect distribution , dividend or other payment on account of their limited liability company interests , partnership interests , capital stock or other equity interests . under our credit facilities , the borrower subsidiaries may pay cash dividends or make other distributions to us in accordance with the applicable credit facility only if no default exists or would be created thereby . the indenture governing the terms of the ati 7.25% ( 7.25 % ) notes prohibit ati and certain of our other subsidiaries that have guaranteed those notes ( sister guarantors ) from paying dividends and making other payments or distributions to us unless certain financial covenants are satisfied . the indentures governing the terms of our 7.50% ( 7.50 % ) notes and 7.125% ( 7.125 % ) notes also contain certain restrictive covenants , which prohibit the restricted subsidiaries under these indentures from paying dividends and making other payments or distributions to us unless certain financial covenants are satisfied . for more information about the restrictions under our credit facilities and our notes indentures , see item 7 of this annual report under the caption 201cmanagement 2019s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations 2014liquidity and capital resources 2014factors affecting sources of liquidity 201d and note 7 to our consolidated financial statements included in this annual report. .
Question: what is the growth rate in the price of shares from the highest value during the quarter ended december 31 , 2006 and the closing price on february 22 , 2007? | 0.04233 | ### Transformed FinQA Question Generation Instructions
#### Step 1: Analyze and Understand the Original FinQA Question
- Objective: Use the given FinQA question to generate a new, logically similar but numerically different question.
- Guidelines:
- Identify the financial concepts and quantitative reasoning in the original question.
- Determine the key variables (e.g., revenue, profit, growth rate, interest) and their relationships.
- Maintain the original question’s structure and complexity.
#### Step 2: Transform and Adapt
- Objective: Create a new FinQA-style question while modifying numerical values and conditions.
- Guidelines:
- Change financial figures, constraints, or business conditions to create a unique question.
- Ensure the transformation maintains financial realism (e.g., realistic market trends, interest rates).
- Retain the original reasoning and computational steps while introducing fresh data points.
#### Step 3: Generate the New FinQA Question
- Objective: Output an original, transformed FinQA question without providing an answer or solution.
- Guidelines:
- Ensure the new question aligns with FinQA’s format and complexity.
- Maintain clarity and well-defined financial relationships.
### Response Rule
- **Generate only the "Transformed FinQA Question" for the given example without including any answer, explanation, or solution.**
### Output Format
#### Transformed FinQA Question: [Write your transformed FinQA question here.]
----
#### Task
#### Original FinQA Question: Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: part ii item 5 . market for registrant 2019s common equity , related stockholder matters and issuer purchases of equity securities the following table presents reported quarterly high and low per share sale prices of our class a common stock on the new york stock exchange ( nyse ) for the years 2006 and 2005. .
|2006|high|low|
|quarter ended march 31|$ 32.68|$ 26.66|
|quarter ended june 30|35.75|27.35|
|quarter ended september 30|36.92|29.98|
|quarter ended december 31|38.74|35.21|
|2005|high|low|
|quarter ended march 31|$ 19.28|$ 17.30|
|quarter ended june 30|21.16|16.28|
|quarter ended september 30|25.20|20.70|
|quarter ended december 31|28.33|22.73|
on february 22 , 2007 , the closing price of our class a common stock was $ 40.38 per share as reported on the nyse . as of february 22 , 2007 , we had 419988395 outstanding shares of class a common stock and 623 registered holders . in february 2004 , all outstanding shares of our class b common stock were converted into shares of our class a common stock on a one-for-one basis pursuant to the occurrence of the 201cdodge conversion event 201d as defined in our charter . also in february 2004 , all outstanding shares of class c common stock were converted into shares of class a common stock on a one-for-one basis . in august 2005 , we amended and restated our charter to , among other things , eliminate our class b common stock and class c common stock . dividends we have never paid a dividend on any class of our common stock . we anticipate that we may retain future earnings , if any , to fund the development and growth of our business . the indentures governing our 7.50% ( 7.50 % ) senior notes due 2012 ( 7.50% ( 7.50 % ) notes ) and our 7.125% ( 7.125 % ) senior notes due 2012 ( 7.125% ( 7.125 % ) notes ) may prohibit us from paying dividends to our stockholders unless we satisfy certain financial covenants . our credit facilities and the indentures governing the terms of our debt securities contain covenants that may restrict the ability of our subsidiaries from making to us any direct or indirect distribution , dividend or other payment on account of their limited liability company interests , partnership interests , capital stock or other equity interests . under our credit facilities , the borrower subsidiaries may pay cash dividends or make other distributions to us in accordance with the applicable credit facility only if no default exists or would be created thereby . the indenture governing the terms of the ati 7.25% ( 7.25 % ) notes prohibit ati and certain of our other subsidiaries that have guaranteed those notes ( sister guarantors ) from paying dividends and making other payments or distributions to us unless certain financial covenants are satisfied . the indentures governing the terms of our 7.50% ( 7.50 % ) notes and 7.125% ( 7.125 % ) notes also contain certain restrictive covenants , which prohibit the restricted subsidiaries under these indentures from paying dividends and making other payments or distributions to us unless certain financial covenants are satisfied . for more information about the restrictions under our credit facilities and our notes indentures , see item 7 of this annual report under the caption 201cmanagement 2019s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations 2014liquidity and capital resources 2014factors affecting sources of liquidity 201d and note 7 to our consolidated financial statements included in this annual report. .
Question: what is the growth rate in the price of shares from the highest value during the quarter ended december 31 , 2006 and the closing price on february 22 , 2007? |
Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: the following is a schedule of future minimum rental payments required under long-term operating leases at october 30 , 2010 : fiscal years operating leases .
|fiscal years|operating leases|
|2011|$ 21871|
|2012|12322|
|2013|9078|
|2014|6381|
|2015|5422|
|later years|30655|
|total|$ 85729|
12 . commitments and contingencies from time to time in the ordinary course of the company 2019s business , various claims , charges and litigation are asserted or commenced against the company arising from , or related to , contractual matters , patents , trademarks , personal injury , environmental matters , product liability , insurance coverage and personnel and employment disputes . as to such claims and litigation , the company can give no assurance that it will prevail . the company does not believe that any current legal matters will have a material adverse effect on the company 2019s financial position , results of operations or cash flows . 13 . retirement plans the company and its subsidiaries have various savings and retirement plans covering substantially all employees . the company maintains a defined contribution plan for the benefit of its eligible u.s . employees . this plan provides for company contributions of up to 5% ( 5 % ) of each participant 2019s total eligible compensation . in addition , the company contributes an amount equal to each participant 2019s pre-tax contribution , if any , up to a maximum of 3% ( 3 % ) of each participant 2019s total eligible compensation . the total expense related to the defined contribution plan for u.s . employees was $ 20.5 million in fiscal 2010 , $ 21.5 million in fiscal 2009 and $ 22.6 million in fiscal 2008 . the company also has various defined benefit pension and other retirement plans for certain non-u.s . employees that are consistent with local statutory requirements and practices . the total expense related to the various defined benefit pension and other retirement plans for certain non-u.s . employees was $ 11.7 million in fiscal 2010 , $ 10.9 million in fiscal 2009 and $ 13.9 million in fiscal 2008 . during fiscal 2009 , the measurement date of the plan 2019s funded status was changed from september 30 to the company 2019s fiscal year end . non-u.s . plan disclosures the company 2019s funding policy for its foreign defined benefit pension plans is consistent with the local requirements of each country . the plans 2019 assets consist primarily of u.s . and non-u.s . equity securities , bonds , property and cash . the benefit obligations and related assets under these plans have been measured at october 30 , 2010 and october 31 , 2009 . analog devices , inc . notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) .
Question: what is the percentage change in the total expense related to the defined contribution plan for non-u.s employees in 2010? | 0.07339 | ### Transformed FinQA Question Generation Instructions
#### Step 1: Analyze and Understand the Original FinQA Question
- Objective: Use the given FinQA question to generate a new, logically similar but numerically different question.
- Guidelines:
- Identify the financial concepts and quantitative reasoning in the original question.
- Determine the key variables (e.g., revenue, profit, growth rate, interest) and their relationships.
- Maintain the original question’s structure and complexity.
#### Step 2: Transform and Adapt
- Objective: Create a new FinQA-style question while modifying numerical values and conditions.
- Guidelines:
- Change financial figures, constraints, or business conditions to create a unique question.
- Ensure the transformation maintains financial realism (e.g., realistic market trends, interest rates).
- Retain the original reasoning and computational steps while introducing fresh data points.
#### Step 3: Generate the New FinQA Question
- Objective: Output an original, transformed FinQA question without providing an answer or solution.
- Guidelines:
- Ensure the new question aligns with FinQA’s format and complexity.
- Maintain clarity and well-defined financial relationships.
### Response Rule
- **Generate only the "Transformed FinQA Question" for the given example without including any answer, explanation, or solution.**
### Output Format
#### Transformed FinQA Question: [Write your transformed FinQA question here.]
----
#### Task
#### Original FinQA Question: Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: the following is a schedule of future minimum rental payments required under long-term operating leases at october 30 , 2010 : fiscal years operating leases .
|fiscal years|operating leases|
|2011|$ 21871|
|2012|12322|
|2013|9078|
|2014|6381|
|2015|5422|
|later years|30655|
|total|$ 85729|
12 . commitments and contingencies from time to time in the ordinary course of the company 2019s business , various claims , charges and litigation are asserted or commenced against the company arising from , or related to , contractual matters , patents , trademarks , personal injury , environmental matters , product liability , insurance coverage and personnel and employment disputes . as to such claims and litigation , the company can give no assurance that it will prevail . the company does not believe that any current legal matters will have a material adverse effect on the company 2019s financial position , results of operations or cash flows . 13 . retirement plans the company and its subsidiaries have various savings and retirement plans covering substantially all employees . the company maintains a defined contribution plan for the benefit of its eligible u.s . employees . this plan provides for company contributions of up to 5% ( 5 % ) of each participant 2019s total eligible compensation . in addition , the company contributes an amount equal to each participant 2019s pre-tax contribution , if any , up to a maximum of 3% ( 3 % ) of each participant 2019s total eligible compensation . the total expense related to the defined contribution plan for u.s . employees was $ 20.5 million in fiscal 2010 , $ 21.5 million in fiscal 2009 and $ 22.6 million in fiscal 2008 . the company also has various defined benefit pension and other retirement plans for certain non-u.s . employees that are consistent with local statutory requirements and practices . the total expense related to the various defined benefit pension and other retirement plans for certain non-u.s . employees was $ 11.7 million in fiscal 2010 , $ 10.9 million in fiscal 2009 and $ 13.9 million in fiscal 2008 . during fiscal 2009 , the measurement date of the plan 2019s funded status was changed from september 30 to the company 2019s fiscal year end . non-u.s . plan disclosures the company 2019s funding policy for its foreign defined benefit pension plans is consistent with the local requirements of each country . the plans 2019 assets consist primarily of u.s . and non-u.s . equity securities , bonds , property and cash . the benefit obligations and related assets under these plans have been measured at october 30 , 2010 and october 31 , 2009 . analog devices , inc . notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) .
Question: what is the percentage change in the total expense related to the defined contribution plan for non-u.s employees in 2010? |
Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: note 9 2014 benefit plans the company has defined benefit pension plans covering certain employees in the united states and certain international locations . postretirement healthcare and life insurance benefits provided to qualifying domestic retirees as well as other postretirement benefit plans in international countries are not material . the measurement date used for the company 2019s employee benefit plans is september 30 . effective january 1 , 2018 , the legacy u.s . pension plan was frozen to limit the participation of employees who are hired or re-hired by the company , or who transfer employment to the company , on or after january 1 , net pension cost for the years ended september 30 included the following components: .
|( millions of dollars )|pension plans 2019|pension plans 2018|pension plans 2017|
|service cost|$ 134|$ 136|$ 110|
|interest cost|107|90|61|
|expected return on plan assets|( 180 )|( 154 )|( 112 )|
|amortization of prior service credit|( 13 )|( 13 )|( 14 )|
|amortization of loss|78|78|92|
|settlements|10|2|2014|
|net pension cost|$ 135|$ 137|$ 138|
|net pension cost included in the preceding table that is attributable to international plans|$ 32|$ 34|$ 43|
net pension cost included in the preceding table that is attributable to international plans $ 32 $ 34 $ 43 the amounts provided above for amortization of prior service credit and amortization of loss represent the reclassifications of prior service credits and net actuarial losses that were recognized in accumulated other comprehensive income ( loss ) in prior periods . the settlement losses recorded in 2019 and 2018 primarily included lump sum benefit payments associated with the company 2019s u.s . supplemental pension plan . the company recognizes pension settlements when payments from the supplemental plan exceed the sum of service and interest cost components of net periodic pension cost associated with this plan for the fiscal year . as further discussed in note 2 , upon adopting an accounting standard update on october 1 , 2018 , all components of the company 2019s net periodic pension and postretirement benefit costs , aside from service cost , are recorded to other income ( expense ) , net on its consolidated statements of income , for all periods presented . notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) becton , dickinson and company .
Question: what was the average net pension cost from 2017 to 2019 in millions | 136.66667 | ### Transformed FinQA Question Generation Instructions
#### Step 1: Analyze and Understand the Original FinQA Question
- Objective: Use the given FinQA question to generate a new, logically similar but numerically different question.
- Guidelines:
- Identify the financial concepts and quantitative reasoning in the original question.
- Determine the key variables (e.g., revenue, profit, growth rate, interest) and their relationships.
- Maintain the original question’s structure and complexity.
#### Step 2: Transform and Adapt
- Objective: Create a new FinQA-style question while modifying numerical values and conditions.
- Guidelines:
- Change financial figures, constraints, or business conditions to create a unique question.
- Ensure the transformation maintains financial realism (e.g., realistic market trends, interest rates).
- Retain the original reasoning and computational steps while introducing fresh data points.
#### Step 3: Generate the New FinQA Question
- Objective: Output an original, transformed FinQA question without providing an answer or solution.
- Guidelines:
- Ensure the new question aligns with FinQA’s format and complexity.
- Maintain clarity and well-defined financial relationships.
### Response Rule
- **Generate only the "Transformed FinQA Question" for the given example without including any answer, explanation, or solution.**
### Output Format
#### Transformed FinQA Question: [Write your transformed FinQA question here.]
----
#### Task
#### Original FinQA Question: Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: note 9 2014 benefit plans the company has defined benefit pension plans covering certain employees in the united states and certain international locations . postretirement healthcare and life insurance benefits provided to qualifying domestic retirees as well as other postretirement benefit plans in international countries are not material . the measurement date used for the company 2019s employee benefit plans is september 30 . effective january 1 , 2018 , the legacy u.s . pension plan was frozen to limit the participation of employees who are hired or re-hired by the company , or who transfer employment to the company , on or after january 1 , net pension cost for the years ended september 30 included the following components: .
|( millions of dollars )|pension plans 2019|pension plans 2018|pension plans 2017|
|service cost|$ 134|$ 136|$ 110|
|interest cost|107|90|61|
|expected return on plan assets|( 180 )|( 154 )|( 112 )|
|amortization of prior service credit|( 13 )|( 13 )|( 14 )|
|amortization of loss|78|78|92|
|settlements|10|2|2014|
|net pension cost|$ 135|$ 137|$ 138|
|net pension cost included in the preceding table that is attributable to international plans|$ 32|$ 34|$ 43|
net pension cost included in the preceding table that is attributable to international plans $ 32 $ 34 $ 43 the amounts provided above for amortization of prior service credit and amortization of loss represent the reclassifications of prior service credits and net actuarial losses that were recognized in accumulated other comprehensive income ( loss ) in prior periods . the settlement losses recorded in 2019 and 2018 primarily included lump sum benefit payments associated with the company 2019s u.s . supplemental pension plan . the company recognizes pension settlements when payments from the supplemental plan exceed the sum of service and interest cost components of net periodic pension cost associated with this plan for the fiscal year . as further discussed in note 2 , upon adopting an accounting standard update on october 1 , 2018 , all components of the company 2019s net periodic pension and postretirement benefit costs , aside from service cost , are recorded to other income ( expense ) , net on its consolidated statements of income , for all periods presented . notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) becton , dickinson and company .
Question: what was the average net pension cost from 2017 to 2019 in millions |
Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: management 2019s discussion and analysis the table below presents the operating results of our institutional client services segment. .
|in millions|year ended december 2012|year ended december 2011|year ended december 2010|
|fixed income currency and commodities client execution|$ 9914|$ 9018|$ 13707|
|equities client execution1|3171|3031|3231|
|commissions and fees|3053|3633|3426|
|securities services|1986|1598|1432|
|total equities|8210|8262|8089|
|total net revenues|18124|17280|21796|
|operating expenses|12480|12837|14994|
|pre-tax earnings|$ 5644|$ 4443|$ 6802|
1 . includes net revenues related to reinsurance of $ 1.08 billion , $ 880 million and $ 827 million for the years ended december 2012 , december 2011 and december 2010 , respectively . 2012 versus 2011 . net revenues in institutional client services were $ 18.12 billion for 2012 , 5% ( 5 % ) higher than 2011 . net revenues in fixed income , currency and commodities client execution were $ 9.91 billion for 2012 , 10% ( 10 % ) higher than 2011 . these results reflected strong net revenues in mortgages , which were significantly higher compared with 2011 . in addition , net revenues in credit products and interest rate products were solid and higher compared with 2011 . these increases were partially offset by significantly lower net revenues in commodities and slightly lower net revenues in currencies . although broad market concerns persisted during 2012 , fixed income , currency and commodities client execution operated in a generally improved environment characterized by tighter credit spreads and less challenging market-making conditions compared with 2011 . net revenues in equities were $ 8.21 billion for 2012 , essentially unchanged compared with 2011 . net revenues in securities services were significantly higher compared with 2011 , reflecting a gain of approximately $ 500 million on the sale of our hedge fund administration business . in addition , equities client execution net revenues were higher than 2011 , primarily reflecting significantly higher results in cash products , principally due to increased levels of client activity . these increases were offset by lower commissions and fees , reflecting lower market volumes . during 2012 , equities operated in an environment generally characterized by an increase in global equity prices and lower volatility levels . the net loss attributable to the impact of changes in our own credit spreads on borrowings for which the fair value option was elected was $ 714 million ( $ 433 million and $ 281 million related to fixed income , currency and commodities client execution and equities client execution , respectively ) for 2012 , compared with a net gain of $ 596 million ( $ 399 million and $ 197 million related to fixed income , currency and commodities client execution and equities client execution , respectively ) for 2011 . during 2012 , institutional client services operated in an environment generally characterized by continued broad market concerns and uncertainties , although positive developments helped to improve market conditions . these developments included certain central bank actions to ease monetary policy and address funding risks for european financial institutions . in addition , the u.s . economy posted stable to improving economic data , including favorable developments in unemployment and housing . these improvements resulted in tighter credit spreads , higher global equity prices and lower levels of volatility . however , concerns about the outlook for the global economy and continued political uncertainty , particularly the political debate in the united states surrounding the fiscal cliff , generally resulted in client risk aversion and lower activity levels . also , uncertainty over financial regulatory reform persisted . if these concerns and uncertainties continue over the long term , net revenues in fixed income , currency and commodities client execution and equities would likely be negatively impacted . operating expenses were $ 12.48 billion for 2012 , 3% ( 3 % ) lower than 2011 , primarily due to lower brokerage , clearing , exchange and distribution fees , and lower impairment charges , partially offset by higher net provisions for litigation and regulatory proceedings . pre-tax earnings were $ 5.64 billion in 2012 , 27% ( 27 % ) higher than 2011 . 2011 versus 2010 . net revenues in institutional client services were $ 17.28 billion for 2011 , 21% ( 21 % ) lower than 2010 . net revenues in fixed income , currency and commodities client execution were $ 9.02 billion for 2011 , 34% ( 34 % ) lower than 2010 . although activity levels during 2011 were generally consistent with 2010 levels , and results were solid during the first quarter of 2011 , the environment during the remainder of 2011 was characterized by broad market concerns and uncertainty , resulting in volatile markets and significantly wider credit spreads , which contributed to difficult market-making conditions and led to reductions in risk by us and our clients . as a result of these conditions , net revenues across the franchise were lower , including significant declines in mortgages and credit products , compared with 2010 . 54 goldman sachs 2012 annual report .
Question: what is the growth rate in pre-tax earnings in 2011? | -0.34681 | ### Transformed FinQA Question Generation Instructions
#### Step 1: Analyze and Understand the Original FinQA Question
- Objective: Use the given FinQA question to generate a new, logically similar but numerically different question.
- Guidelines:
- Identify the financial concepts and quantitative reasoning in the original question.
- Determine the key variables (e.g., revenue, profit, growth rate, interest) and their relationships.
- Maintain the original question’s structure and complexity.
#### Step 2: Transform and Adapt
- Objective: Create a new FinQA-style question while modifying numerical values and conditions.
- Guidelines:
- Change financial figures, constraints, or business conditions to create a unique question.
- Ensure the transformation maintains financial realism (e.g., realistic market trends, interest rates).
- Retain the original reasoning and computational steps while introducing fresh data points.
#### Step 3: Generate the New FinQA Question
- Objective: Output an original, transformed FinQA question without providing an answer or solution.
- Guidelines:
- Ensure the new question aligns with FinQA’s format and complexity.
- Maintain clarity and well-defined financial relationships.
### Response Rule
- **Generate only the "Transformed FinQA Question" for the given example without including any answer, explanation, or solution.**
### Output Format
#### Transformed FinQA Question: [Write your transformed FinQA question here.]
----
#### Task
#### Original FinQA Question: Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: management 2019s discussion and analysis the table below presents the operating results of our institutional client services segment. .
|in millions|year ended december 2012|year ended december 2011|year ended december 2010|
|fixed income currency and commodities client execution|$ 9914|$ 9018|$ 13707|
|equities client execution1|3171|3031|3231|
|commissions and fees|3053|3633|3426|
|securities services|1986|1598|1432|
|total equities|8210|8262|8089|
|total net revenues|18124|17280|21796|
|operating expenses|12480|12837|14994|
|pre-tax earnings|$ 5644|$ 4443|$ 6802|
1 . includes net revenues related to reinsurance of $ 1.08 billion , $ 880 million and $ 827 million for the years ended december 2012 , december 2011 and december 2010 , respectively . 2012 versus 2011 . net revenues in institutional client services were $ 18.12 billion for 2012 , 5% ( 5 % ) higher than 2011 . net revenues in fixed income , currency and commodities client execution were $ 9.91 billion for 2012 , 10% ( 10 % ) higher than 2011 . these results reflected strong net revenues in mortgages , which were significantly higher compared with 2011 . in addition , net revenues in credit products and interest rate products were solid and higher compared with 2011 . these increases were partially offset by significantly lower net revenues in commodities and slightly lower net revenues in currencies . although broad market concerns persisted during 2012 , fixed income , currency and commodities client execution operated in a generally improved environment characterized by tighter credit spreads and less challenging market-making conditions compared with 2011 . net revenues in equities were $ 8.21 billion for 2012 , essentially unchanged compared with 2011 . net revenues in securities services were significantly higher compared with 2011 , reflecting a gain of approximately $ 500 million on the sale of our hedge fund administration business . in addition , equities client execution net revenues were higher than 2011 , primarily reflecting significantly higher results in cash products , principally due to increased levels of client activity . these increases were offset by lower commissions and fees , reflecting lower market volumes . during 2012 , equities operated in an environment generally characterized by an increase in global equity prices and lower volatility levels . the net loss attributable to the impact of changes in our own credit spreads on borrowings for which the fair value option was elected was $ 714 million ( $ 433 million and $ 281 million related to fixed income , currency and commodities client execution and equities client execution , respectively ) for 2012 , compared with a net gain of $ 596 million ( $ 399 million and $ 197 million related to fixed income , currency and commodities client execution and equities client execution , respectively ) for 2011 . during 2012 , institutional client services operated in an environment generally characterized by continued broad market concerns and uncertainties , although positive developments helped to improve market conditions . these developments included certain central bank actions to ease monetary policy and address funding risks for european financial institutions . in addition , the u.s . economy posted stable to improving economic data , including favorable developments in unemployment and housing . these improvements resulted in tighter credit spreads , higher global equity prices and lower levels of volatility . however , concerns about the outlook for the global economy and continued political uncertainty , particularly the political debate in the united states surrounding the fiscal cliff , generally resulted in client risk aversion and lower activity levels . also , uncertainty over financial regulatory reform persisted . if these concerns and uncertainties continue over the long term , net revenues in fixed income , currency and commodities client execution and equities would likely be negatively impacted . operating expenses were $ 12.48 billion for 2012 , 3% ( 3 % ) lower than 2011 , primarily due to lower brokerage , clearing , exchange and distribution fees , and lower impairment charges , partially offset by higher net provisions for litigation and regulatory proceedings . pre-tax earnings were $ 5.64 billion in 2012 , 27% ( 27 % ) higher than 2011 . 2011 versus 2010 . net revenues in institutional client services were $ 17.28 billion for 2011 , 21% ( 21 % ) lower than 2010 . net revenues in fixed income , currency and commodities client execution were $ 9.02 billion for 2011 , 34% ( 34 % ) lower than 2010 . although activity levels during 2011 were generally consistent with 2010 levels , and results were solid during the first quarter of 2011 , the environment during the remainder of 2011 was characterized by broad market concerns and uncertainty , resulting in volatile markets and significantly wider credit spreads , which contributed to difficult market-making conditions and led to reductions in risk by us and our clients . as a result of these conditions , net revenues across the franchise were lower , including significant declines in mortgages and credit products , compared with 2010 . 54 goldman sachs 2012 annual report .
Question: what is the growth rate in pre-tax earnings in 2011? |
Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: cash and cash equivalents cash equivalents include highly-liquid investments with a maturity of three months or less when purchased . accounts receivable and allowance for doubtful accounts accounts receivable are carried at the invoiced amounts , less an allowance for doubtful accounts , and generally do not bear interest . the company estimates the balance of allowance for doubtful accounts by analyzing accounts receivable balances by age and applying historical write-off and collection trend rates . the company 2019s estimates include separately providing for customer receivables based on specific circumstances and credit conditions , and when it is deemed probable that the balance is uncollectible . account balances are written off against the allowance when it is determined the receivable will not be recovered . the company 2019s allowance for doubtful accounts balance also includes an allowance for the expected return of products shipped and credits related to pricing or quantities shipped of $ 15 million , $ 14 million and $ 15 million as of december 31 , 2017 , 2016 , and 2015 , respectively . returns and credit activity is recorded directly to sales as a reduction . the following table summarizes the activity in the allowance for doubtful accounts: .
|( millions )|2017|2016|2015|
|beginning balance|$ 67.6|$ 75.3|$ 77.5|
|bad debt expense|17.1|20.1|25.8|
|write-offs|-15.7 ( 15.7 )|-24.6 ( 24.6 )|-21.9 ( 21.9 )|
|other ( a )|2.5|-3.2 ( 3.2 )|-6.1 ( 6.1 )|
|ending balance|$ 71.5|$ 67.6|$ 75.3|
( a ) other amounts are primarily the effects of changes in currency translations and the impact of allowance for returns and credits . inventory valuations inventories are valued at the lower of cost or net realizable value . certain u.s . inventory costs are determined on a last-in , first-out ( 201clifo 201d ) basis . lifo inventories represented 39% ( 39 % ) and 40% ( 40 % ) of consolidated inventories as of december 31 , 2017 and 2016 , respectively . all other inventory costs are determined using either the average cost or first-in , first-out ( 201cfifo 201d ) methods . inventory values at fifo , as shown in note 5 , approximate replacement cost . property , plant and equipment property , plant and equipment assets are stated at cost . merchandising and customer equipment consists principally of various dispensing systems for the company 2019s cleaning and sanitizing products , dishwashing machines and process control and monitoring equipment . certain dispensing systems capitalized by the company are accounted for on a mass asset basis , whereby equipment is capitalized and depreciated as a group and written off when fully depreciated . the company capitalizes both internal and external costs of development or purchase of computer software for internal use . costs incurred for data conversion , training and maintenance associated with capitalized software are expensed as incurred . expenditures for major renewals and improvements , which significantly extend the useful lives of existing plant and equipment , are capitalized and depreciated . expenditures for repairs and maintenance are charged to expense as incurred . upon retirement or disposition of plant and equipment , the cost and related accumulated depreciation are removed from the accounts and any resulting gain or loss is recognized in income . depreciation is charged to operations using the straight-line method over the assets 2019 estimated useful lives ranging from 5 to 40 years for buildings and leasehold improvements , 3 to 20 years for machinery and equipment , 3 to 15 years for merchandising and customer equipment and 3 to 7 years for capitalized software . the straight-line method of depreciation reflects an appropriate allocation of the cost of the assets to earnings in proportion to the amount of economic benefits obtained by the company in each reporting period . depreciation expense was $ 586 million , $ 561 million and $ 560 million for 2017 , 2016 and 2015 , respectively. .
Question: what is the net change in the balance of allowance for doubtful accounts from 2016 to 2017? | 3.9 | ### Transformed FinQA Question Generation Instructions
#### Step 1: Analyze and Understand the Original FinQA Question
- Objective: Use the given FinQA question to generate a new, logically similar but numerically different question.
- Guidelines:
- Identify the financial concepts and quantitative reasoning in the original question.
- Determine the key variables (e.g., revenue, profit, growth rate, interest) and their relationships.
- Maintain the original question’s structure and complexity.
#### Step 2: Transform and Adapt
- Objective: Create a new FinQA-style question while modifying numerical values and conditions.
- Guidelines:
- Change financial figures, constraints, or business conditions to create a unique question.
- Ensure the transformation maintains financial realism (e.g., realistic market trends, interest rates).
- Retain the original reasoning and computational steps while introducing fresh data points.
#### Step 3: Generate the New FinQA Question
- Objective: Output an original, transformed FinQA question without providing an answer or solution.
- Guidelines:
- Ensure the new question aligns with FinQA’s format and complexity.
- Maintain clarity and well-defined financial relationships.
### Response Rule
- **Generate only the "Transformed FinQA Question" for the given example without including any answer, explanation, or solution.**
### Output Format
#### Transformed FinQA Question: [Write your transformed FinQA question here.]
----
#### Task
#### Original FinQA Question: Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: cash and cash equivalents cash equivalents include highly-liquid investments with a maturity of three months or less when purchased . accounts receivable and allowance for doubtful accounts accounts receivable are carried at the invoiced amounts , less an allowance for doubtful accounts , and generally do not bear interest . the company estimates the balance of allowance for doubtful accounts by analyzing accounts receivable balances by age and applying historical write-off and collection trend rates . the company 2019s estimates include separately providing for customer receivables based on specific circumstances and credit conditions , and when it is deemed probable that the balance is uncollectible . account balances are written off against the allowance when it is determined the receivable will not be recovered . the company 2019s allowance for doubtful accounts balance also includes an allowance for the expected return of products shipped and credits related to pricing or quantities shipped of $ 15 million , $ 14 million and $ 15 million as of december 31 , 2017 , 2016 , and 2015 , respectively . returns and credit activity is recorded directly to sales as a reduction . the following table summarizes the activity in the allowance for doubtful accounts: .
|( millions )|2017|2016|2015|
|beginning balance|$ 67.6|$ 75.3|$ 77.5|
|bad debt expense|17.1|20.1|25.8|
|write-offs|-15.7 ( 15.7 )|-24.6 ( 24.6 )|-21.9 ( 21.9 )|
|other ( a )|2.5|-3.2 ( 3.2 )|-6.1 ( 6.1 )|
|ending balance|$ 71.5|$ 67.6|$ 75.3|
( a ) other amounts are primarily the effects of changes in currency translations and the impact of allowance for returns and credits . inventory valuations inventories are valued at the lower of cost or net realizable value . certain u.s . inventory costs are determined on a last-in , first-out ( 201clifo 201d ) basis . lifo inventories represented 39% ( 39 % ) and 40% ( 40 % ) of consolidated inventories as of december 31 , 2017 and 2016 , respectively . all other inventory costs are determined using either the average cost or first-in , first-out ( 201cfifo 201d ) methods . inventory values at fifo , as shown in note 5 , approximate replacement cost . property , plant and equipment property , plant and equipment assets are stated at cost . merchandising and customer equipment consists principally of various dispensing systems for the company 2019s cleaning and sanitizing products , dishwashing machines and process control and monitoring equipment . certain dispensing systems capitalized by the company are accounted for on a mass asset basis , whereby equipment is capitalized and depreciated as a group and written off when fully depreciated . the company capitalizes both internal and external costs of development or purchase of computer software for internal use . costs incurred for data conversion , training and maintenance associated with capitalized software are expensed as incurred . expenditures for major renewals and improvements , which significantly extend the useful lives of existing plant and equipment , are capitalized and depreciated . expenditures for repairs and maintenance are charged to expense as incurred . upon retirement or disposition of plant and equipment , the cost and related accumulated depreciation are removed from the accounts and any resulting gain or loss is recognized in income . depreciation is charged to operations using the straight-line method over the assets 2019 estimated useful lives ranging from 5 to 40 years for buildings and leasehold improvements , 3 to 20 years for machinery and equipment , 3 to 15 years for merchandising and customer equipment and 3 to 7 years for capitalized software . the straight-line method of depreciation reflects an appropriate allocation of the cost of the assets to earnings in proportion to the amount of economic benefits obtained by the company in each reporting period . depreciation expense was $ 586 million , $ 561 million and $ 560 million for 2017 , 2016 and 2015 , respectively. .
Question: what is the net change in the balance of allowance for doubtful accounts from 2016 to 2017? |
Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: the following table sets forth our refined products sales by product group and our average sales price for each of the last three years . refined product sales ( thousands of barrels per day ) 2009 2008 2007 .
|( thousands of barrels per day )|2009|2008|2007|
|gasoline|830|756|791|
|distillates|357|375|377|
|propane|23|22|23|
|feedstocks and special products|75|100|103|
|heavy fuel oil|24|23|29|
|asphalt|69|76|87|
|total|1378|1352|1410|
|average sales price ( dollars per barrel )|$ 70.86|$ 109.49|$ 86.53|
we sell gasoline , gasoline blendstocks and no . 1 and no . 2 fuel oils ( including kerosene , jet fuel and diesel fuel ) to wholesale marketing customers in the midwest , upper great plains , gulf coast and southeastern regions of the united states . we sold 51 percent of our gasoline volumes and 87 percent of our distillates volumes on a wholesale or spot market basis in 2009 . the demand for gasoline is seasonal in many of our markets , with demand typically being at its highest levels during the summer months . we have blended ethanol into gasoline for over 20 years and began expanding our blending program in 2007 , in part due to federal regulations that require us to use specified volumes of renewable fuels . ethanol volumes sold in blended gasoline were 60 mbpd in 2009 , 54 mbpd in 2008 and 40 mbpd in 2007 . the future expansion or contraction of our ethanol blending program will be driven by the economics of the ethanol supply and by government regulations . we sell reformulated gasoline , which is also blended with ethanol , in parts of our marketing territory , including : chicago , illinois ; louisville , kentucky ; northern kentucky ; milwaukee , wisconsin , and hartford , illinois . we also sell biodiesel-blended diesel in minnesota , illinois and kentucky . we produce propane at all seven of our refineries . propane is primarily used for home heating and cooking , as a feedstock within the petrochemical industry , for grain drying and as a fuel for trucks and other vehicles . our propane sales are typically split evenly between the home heating market and industrial consumers . we are a producer and marketer of petrochemicals and specialty products . product availability varies by refinery and includes benzene , cumene , dilute naphthalene oil , molten maleic anhydride , molten sulfur , propylene , toluene and xylene . we market propylene , cumene and sulfur domestically to customers in the chemical industry . we sell maleic anhydride throughout the united states and canada . we also have the capacity to produce 1400 tons per day of anode grade coke at our robinson refinery , which is used to make carbon anodes for the aluminum smelting industry , and 5500 tons per day of fuel grade coke at the garyville refinery , which is used for power generation and in miscellaneous industrial applications . in early 2009 , we discontinued production and sales of petroleum pitch and aliphatic solvents at our catlettsburg refinery . we produce and market heavy residual fuel oil or related components at all seven of our refineries . another product of crude oil , heavy residual fuel oil , is primarily used in the utility and ship bunkering ( fuel ) industries , though there are other more specialized uses of the product . we have refinery based asphalt production capacity of up to 108 mbpd . we market asphalt through 33 owned or leased terminals throughout the midwest and southeast . we have a broad customer base , including approximately 675 asphalt-paving contractors , government entities ( states , counties , cities and townships ) and asphalt roofing shingle manufacturers . we sell asphalt in the wholesale and cargo markets via rail and barge . we also produce asphalt cements , polymer modified asphalt , emulsified asphalt and industrial asphalts . in 2007 , we acquired a 35 percent interest in an entity which owns and operates a 110-million-gallon-per-year ethanol production facility in clymers , indiana . we also own a 50 percent interest in an entity which owns a 110-million-gallon-per-year ethanol production facility in greenville , ohio . the greenville plant began production in february 2008 . both of these facilities are managed by a co-owner. .
Question: what were total ethanol volumes sold in blended gasoline in 2009 , 2008 , and 2007 in tbd? | 154.0 | ### Transformed FinQA Question Generation Instructions
#### Step 1: Analyze and Understand the Original FinQA Question
- Objective: Use the given FinQA question to generate a new, logically similar but numerically different question.
- Guidelines:
- Identify the financial concepts and quantitative reasoning in the original question.
- Determine the key variables (e.g., revenue, profit, growth rate, interest) and their relationships.
- Maintain the original question’s structure and complexity.
#### Step 2: Transform and Adapt
- Objective: Create a new FinQA-style question while modifying numerical values and conditions.
- Guidelines:
- Change financial figures, constraints, or business conditions to create a unique question.
- Ensure the transformation maintains financial realism (e.g., realistic market trends, interest rates).
- Retain the original reasoning and computational steps while introducing fresh data points.
#### Step 3: Generate the New FinQA Question
- Objective: Output an original, transformed FinQA question without providing an answer or solution.
- Guidelines:
- Ensure the new question aligns with FinQA’s format and complexity.
- Maintain clarity and well-defined financial relationships.
### Response Rule
- **Generate only the "Transformed FinQA Question" for the given example without including any answer, explanation, or solution.**
### Output Format
#### Transformed FinQA Question: [Write your transformed FinQA question here.]
----
#### Task
#### Original FinQA Question: Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: the following table sets forth our refined products sales by product group and our average sales price for each of the last three years . refined product sales ( thousands of barrels per day ) 2009 2008 2007 .
|( thousands of barrels per day )|2009|2008|2007|
|gasoline|830|756|791|
|distillates|357|375|377|
|propane|23|22|23|
|feedstocks and special products|75|100|103|
|heavy fuel oil|24|23|29|
|asphalt|69|76|87|
|total|1378|1352|1410|
|average sales price ( dollars per barrel )|$ 70.86|$ 109.49|$ 86.53|
we sell gasoline , gasoline blendstocks and no . 1 and no . 2 fuel oils ( including kerosene , jet fuel and diesel fuel ) to wholesale marketing customers in the midwest , upper great plains , gulf coast and southeastern regions of the united states . we sold 51 percent of our gasoline volumes and 87 percent of our distillates volumes on a wholesale or spot market basis in 2009 . the demand for gasoline is seasonal in many of our markets , with demand typically being at its highest levels during the summer months . we have blended ethanol into gasoline for over 20 years and began expanding our blending program in 2007 , in part due to federal regulations that require us to use specified volumes of renewable fuels . ethanol volumes sold in blended gasoline were 60 mbpd in 2009 , 54 mbpd in 2008 and 40 mbpd in 2007 . the future expansion or contraction of our ethanol blending program will be driven by the economics of the ethanol supply and by government regulations . we sell reformulated gasoline , which is also blended with ethanol , in parts of our marketing territory , including : chicago , illinois ; louisville , kentucky ; northern kentucky ; milwaukee , wisconsin , and hartford , illinois . we also sell biodiesel-blended diesel in minnesota , illinois and kentucky . we produce propane at all seven of our refineries . propane is primarily used for home heating and cooking , as a feedstock within the petrochemical industry , for grain drying and as a fuel for trucks and other vehicles . our propane sales are typically split evenly between the home heating market and industrial consumers . we are a producer and marketer of petrochemicals and specialty products . product availability varies by refinery and includes benzene , cumene , dilute naphthalene oil , molten maleic anhydride , molten sulfur , propylene , toluene and xylene . we market propylene , cumene and sulfur domestically to customers in the chemical industry . we sell maleic anhydride throughout the united states and canada . we also have the capacity to produce 1400 tons per day of anode grade coke at our robinson refinery , which is used to make carbon anodes for the aluminum smelting industry , and 5500 tons per day of fuel grade coke at the garyville refinery , which is used for power generation and in miscellaneous industrial applications . in early 2009 , we discontinued production and sales of petroleum pitch and aliphatic solvents at our catlettsburg refinery . we produce and market heavy residual fuel oil or related components at all seven of our refineries . another product of crude oil , heavy residual fuel oil , is primarily used in the utility and ship bunkering ( fuel ) industries , though there are other more specialized uses of the product . we have refinery based asphalt production capacity of up to 108 mbpd . we market asphalt through 33 owned or leased terminals throughout the midwest and southeast . we have a broad customer base , including approximately 675 asphalt-paving contractors , government entities ( states , counties , cities and townships ) and asphalt roofing shingle manufacturers . we sell asphalt in the wholesale and cargo markets via rail and barge . we also produce asphalt cements , polymer modified asphalt , emulsified asphalt and industrial asphalts . in 2007 , we acquired a 35 percent interest in an entity which owns and operates a 110-million-gallon-per-year ethanol production facility in clymers , indiana . we also own a 50 percent interest in an entity which owns a 110-million-gallon-per-year ethanol production facility in greenville , ohio . the greenville plant began production in february 2008 . both of these facilities are managed by a co-owner. .
Question: what were total ethanol volumes sold in blended gasoline in 2009 , 2008 , and 2007 in tbd? |
Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: taxes . if group or its bermuda subsidiaries were to become subject to u.s . income tax ; there could be a material adverse effect on the company 2019s financial condition , results of operations and cash flows . united kingdom . bermuda re 2019s uk branch conducts business in the uk and is subject to taxation in the uk . bermuda re believes that it has operated and will continue to operate its bermuda operation in a manner which will not cause them to be subject to uk taxation . if bermuda re 2019s bermuda operations were to become subject to uk income tax there could be a material adverse impact on the company 2019s financial condition , results of operations and cash flow . available information the company 2019s annual reports on form 10-k , quarterly reports on form 10-q , current reports on form 8-k , proxy state- ments and amendments to those reports are available free of charge through the company 2019s internet website at http://www.everestre.com as soon as reasonably practicable after such reports are electronically filed with the securities and exchange commission ( the 201csec 201d ) . i t e m 1 a . r i s k f a c t o r s in addition to the other information provided in this report , the following risk factors should be considered when evaluating an investment in our securities . if the circumstances contemplated by the individual risk factors materialize , our business , finan- cial condition and results of operations could be materially and adversely affected and the trading price of our common shares could decline significantly . r i s k s r e l a t i n g t o o u r b u s i n e s s our results could be adversely affected by catastrophic events . we are exposed to unpredictable catastrophic events , including weather-related and other natural catastrophes , as well as acts of terrorism . any material reduction in our operating results caused by the occurrence of one or more catastrophes could inhibit our ability to pay dividends or to meet our interest and principal payment obligations . we define a catastrophe as an event that causes a pre-tax loss on property exposures before reinsurance of at least $ 5.0 million , before corporate level rein- surance and taxes . effective for the third quarter 2005 , industrial risk losses have been excluded from catastrophe losses , with prior periods adjusted for comparison purposes . by way of illustration , during the past five calendar years , pre-tax catastrophe losses , net of contract specific reinsurance but before cessions under corporate reinsurance programs , were as follows: .
|calendar year|calendar year||
|2006|$ 287.9|million|
|2005|$ 1485.7|million|
|2004|$ 390.0|million|
|2003|$ 35.0|million|
|2002|$ 30.0|million|
our losses from future catastrophic events could exceed our projections . we use projections of possible losses from future catastrophic events of varying types and magnitudes as a strategic under- writing tool . we use these loss projections to estimate our potential catastrophe losses in certain geographic areas and decide on the purchase of retrocessional coverage or other actions to limit the extent of potential losses in a given geographic area . these loss projections are approximations reliant on a mix of quantitative and qualitative processes and actual losses may exceed the projections by a material amount . we focus on potential losses that can be generated by any single event as part of our evaluation and monitoring of our aggre- gate exposure to catastrophic events . accordingly , we employ various techniques to estimate the amount of loss we could sustain from any single catastrophic event in various geographical areas . these techniques range from non-modeled deterministic approaches 2014such as tracking aggregate limits exposed in catastrophe-prone zones and applying historic dam- age factors 2014to modeled approaches that scientifically measure catastrophe risks using sophisticated monte carlo simulation techniques that provide insights into the frequency and severity of expected losses on a probabilistic basis . if our loss reserves are inadequate to meet our actual losses , net income would be reduced or we could incur a loss . we are required to maintain reserves to cover our estimated ultimate liability of losses and loss adjustment expenses for both reported and unreported claims incurred . these reserves are only estimates of what we believe the settlement and adminis- tration of claims will cost based on facts and circumstances known to us . in setting reserves for our reinsurance liabilities , we rely on claim data supplied by our ceding companies and brokers and we employ actuarial and statistical projections . the information received from our ceding companies is not always timely or accurate , which can contribute to inaccuracies in our 81790fin_a 4/13/07 11:08 am page 23 http://www.everestre.com .
Question: what are the total pre-tax catastrophe losses in the three two years? | 2163.6 | ### Transformed FinQA Question Generation Instructions
#### Step 1: Analyze and Understand the Original FinQA Question
- Objective: Use the given FinQA question to generate a new, logically similar but numerically different question.
- Guidelines:
- Identify the financial concepts and quantitative reasoning in the original question.
- Determine the key variables (e.g., revenue, profit, growth rate, interest) and their relationships.
- Maintain the original question’s structure and complexity.
#### Step 2: Transform and Adapt
- Objective: Create a new FinQA-style question while modifying numerical values and conditions.
- Guidelines:
- Change financial figures, constraints, or business conditions to create a unique question.
- Ensure the transformation maintains financial realism (e.g., realistic market trends, interest rates).
- Retain the original reasoning and computational steps while introducing fresh data points.
#### Step 3: Generate the New FinQA Question
- Objective: Output an original, transformed FinQA question without providing an answer or solution.
- Guidelines:
- Ensure the new question aligns with FinQA’s format and complexity.
- Maintain clarity and well-defined financial relationships.
### Response Rule
- **Generate only the "Transformed FinQA Question" for the given example without including any answer, explanation, or solution.**
### Output Format
#### Transformed FinQA Question: [Write your transformed FinQA question here.]
----
#### Task
#### Original FinQA Question: Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: taxes . if group or its bermuda subsidiaries were to become subject to u.s . income tax ; there could be a material adverse effect on the company 2019s financial condition , results of operations and cash flows . united kingdom . bermuda re 2019s uk branch conducts business in the uk and is subject to taxation in the uk . bermuda re believes that it has operated and will continue to operate its bermuda operation in a manner which will not cause them to be subject to uk taxation . if bermuda re 2019s bermuda operations were to become subject to uk income tax there could be a material adverse impact on the company 2019s financial condition , results of operations and cash flow . available information the company 2019s annual reports on form 10-k , quarterly reports on form 10-q , current reports on form 8-k , proxy state- ments and amendments to those reports are available free of charge through the company 2019s internet website at http://www.everestre.com as soon as reasonably practicable after such reports are electronically filed with the securities and exchange commission ( the 201csec 201d ) . i t e m 1 a . r i s k f a c t o r s in addition to the other information provided in this report , the following risk factors should be considered when evaluating an investment in our securities . if the circumstances contemplated by the individual risk factors materialize , our business , finan- cial condition and results of operations could be materially and adversely affected and the trading price of our common shares could decline significantly . r i s k s r e l a t i n g t o o u r b u s i n e s s our results could be adversely affected by catastrophic events . we are exposed to unpredictable catastrophic events , including weather-related and other natural catastrophes , as well as acts of terrorism . any material reduction in our operating results caused by the occurrence of one or more catastrophes could inhibit our ability to pay dividends or to meet our interest and principal payment obligations . we define a catastrophe as an event that causes a pre-tax loss on property exposures before reinsurance of at least $ 5.0 million , before corporate level rein- surance and taxes . effective for the third quarter 2005 , industrial risk losses have been excluded from catastrophe losses , with prior periods adjusted for comparison purposes . by way of illustration , during the past five calendar years , pre-tax catastrophe losses , net of contract specific reinsurance but before cessions under corporate reinsurance programs , were as follows: .
|calendar year|calendar year||
|2006|$ 287.9|million|
|2005|$ 1485.7|million|
|2004|$ 390.0|million|
|2003|$ 35.0|million|
|2002|$ 30.0|million|
our losses from future catastrophic events could exceed our projections . we use projections of possible losses from future catastrophic events of varying types and magnitudes as a strategic under- writing tool . we use these loss projections to estimate our potential catastrophe losses in certain geographic areas and decide on the purchase of retrocessional coverage or other actions to limit the extent of potential losses in a given geographic area . these loss projections are approximations reliant on a mix of quantitative and qualitative processes and actual losses may exceed the projections by a material amount . we focus on potential losses that can be generated by any single event as part of our evaluation and monitoring of our aggre- gate exposure to catastrophic events . accordingly , we employ various techniques to estimate the amount of loss we could sustain from any single catastrophic event in various geographical areas . these techniques range from non-modeled deterministic approaches 2014such as tracking aggregate limits exposed in catastrophe-prone zones and applying historic dam- age factors 2014to modeled approaches that scientifically measure catastrophe risks using sophisticated monte carlo simulation techniques that provide insights into the frequency and severity of expected losses on a probabilistic basis . if our loss reserves are inadequate to meet our actual losses , net income would be reduced or we could incur a loss . we are required to maintain reserves to cover our estimated ultimate liability of losses and loss adjustment expenses for both reported and unreported claims incurred . these reserves are only estimates of what we believe the settlement and adminis- tration of claims will cost based on facts and circumstances known to us . in setting reserves for our reinsurance liabilities , we rely on claim data supplied by our ceding companies and brokers and we employ actuarial and statistical projections . the information received from our ceding companies is not always timely or accurate , which can contribute to inaccuracies in our 81790fin_a 4/13/07 11:08 am page 23 http://www.everestre.com .
Question: what are the total pre-tax catastrophe losses in the three two years? |
Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: fortron industries llc . fortron is a leading global producer of pps , sold under the fortron ae brand , which is used in a wide variety of automotive and other applications , especially those requiring heat and/or chemical resistance . fortron's facility is located in wilmington , north carolina . this venture combines the sales , marketing , distribution , compounding and manufacturing expertise of celanese with the pps polymer technology expertise of kureha america inc . cellulose derivatives strategic ventures . our cellulose derivatives ventures generally fund their operations using operating cash flow and pay dividends based on each ventures' performance in the preceding year . in 2014 , 2013 and 2012 , we received cash dividends of $ 115 million , $ 92 million and $ 83 million , respectively . although our ownership interest in each of our cellulose derivatives ventures exceeds 20% ( 20 % ) , we account for these investments using the cost method of accounting because we determined that we cannot exercise significant influence over these entities due to local government investment in and influence over these entities , limitations on our involvement in the day-to-day operations and the present inability of the entities to provide timely financial information prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the united states of america ( "us gaap" ) . 2022 other equity method investments infraservs . we hold indirect ownership interests in several german infraserv groups that own and develop industrial parks and provide on-site general and administrative support to tenants . our ownership interest in the equity investments in infraserv affiliates are as follows : as of december 31 , 2014 ( in percentages ) .
||as of december 31 2014 ( in percentages )|
|infraserv gmbh & co . gendorf kg|39|
|infraserv gmbh & co . hoechst kg|32|
|infraserv gmbh & co . knapsack kg|27|
research and development our businesses are innovation-oriented and conduct research and development activities to develop new , and optimize existing , production technologies , as well as to develop commercially viable new products and applications . research and development expense was $ 86 million , $ 85 million and $ 104 million for the years ended december 31 , 2014 , 2013 and 2012 , respectively . we consider the amounts spent during each of the last three fiscal years on research and development activities to be sufficient to execute our current strategic initiatives . intellectual property we attach importance to protecting our intellectual property , including safeguarding our confidential information and through our patents , trademarks and copyrights , in order to preserve our investment in research and development , manufacturing and marketing . patents may cover processes , equipment , products , intermediate products and product uses . we also seek to register trademarks as a means of protecting the brand names of our company and products . patents . in most industrial countries , patent protection exists for new substances and formulations , as well as for certain unique applications and production processes . however , we do business in regions of the world where intellectual property protection may be limited and difficult to enforce . confidential information . we maintain stringent information security policies and procedures wherever we do business . such information security policies and procedures include data encryption , controls over the disclosure and safekeeping of confidential information and trade secrets , as well as employee awareness training . trademarks . aoplus ae , aoplus ae2 , aoplus ae3 , ateva ae , avicor ae , britecoat ae , celanese ae , celanex ae , celcon ae , celfx 2122 , celstran ae , celvolit ae , clarifoil ae , duroset ae , ecovae ae , factor ae , fortron ae , gur ae , hostaform ae , impet ae , mowilith ae , nutrinova ae , qorus 2122 , riteflex ae , sunett ae , tcx 2122 , thermx ae , tufcor ae , vantage ae , vantageplus 2122 , vantage ae2 , vectra ae , vinamul ae , vitaldose ae , zenite ae and certain other branded products and services named in this document are registered or reserved trademarks or service marks owned or licensed by celanese . the foregoing is not intended to be an exhaustive or comprehensive list of all registered or reserved trademarks and service marks owned or licensed by celanese . fortron ae is a registered trademark of fortron industries llc. .
Question: what is the growth rate in research and development expenses from 2012 to 2013? | -0.18269 | ### Transformed FinQA Question Generation Instructions
#### Step 1: Analyze and Understand the Original FinQA Question
- Objective: Use the given FinQA question to generate a new, logically similar but numerically different question.
- Guidelines:
- Identify the financial concepts and quantitative reasoning in the original question.
- Determine the key variables (e.g., revenue, profit, growth rate, interest) and their relationships.
- Maintain the original question’s structure and complexity.
#### Step 2: Transform and Adapt
- Objective: Create a new FinQA-style question while modifying numerical values and conditions.
- Guidelines:
- Change financial figures, constraints, or business conditions to create a unique question.
- Ensure the transformation maintains financial realism (e.g., realistic market trends, interest rates).
- Retain the original reasoning and computational steps while introducing fresh data points.
#### Step 3: Generate the New FinQA Question
- Objective: Output an original, transformed FinQA question without providing an answer or solution.
- Guidelines:
- Ensure the new question aligns with FinQA’s format and complexity.
- Maintain clarity and well-defined financial relationships.
### Response Rule
- **Generate only the "Transformed FinQA Question" for the given example without including any answer, explanation, or solution.**
### Output Format
#### Transformed FinQA Question: [Write your transformed FinQA question here.]
----
#### Task
#### Original FinQA Question: Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: fortron industries llc . fortron is a leading global producer of pps , sold under the fortron ae brand , which is used in a wide variety of automotive and other applications , especially those requiring heat and/or chemical resistance . fortron's facility is located in wilmington , north carolina . this venture combines the sales , marketing , distribution , compounding and manufacturing expertise of celanese with the pps polymer technology expertise of kureha america inc . cellulose derivatives strategic ventures . our cellulose derivatives ventures generally fund their operations using operating cash flow and pay dividends based on each ventures' performance in the preceding year . in 2014 , 2013 and 2012 , we received cash dividends of $ 115 million , $ 92 million and $ 83 million , respectively . although our ownership interest in each of our cellulose derivatives ventures exceeds 20% ( 20 % ) , we account for these investments using the cost method of accounting because we determined that we cannot exercise significant influence over these entities due to local government investment in and influence over these entities , limitations on our involvement in the day-to-day operations and the present inability of the entities to provide timely financial information prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the united states of america ( "us gaap" ) . 2022 other equity method investments infraservs . we hold indirect ownership interests in several german infraserv groups that own and develop industrial parks and provide on-site general and administrative support to tenants . our ownership interest in the equity investments in infraserv affiliates are as follows : as of december 31 , 2014 ( in percentages ) .
||as of december 31 2014 ( in percentages )|
|infraserv gmbh & co . gendorf kg|39|
|infraserv gmbh & co . hoechst kg|32|
|infraserv gmbh & co . knapsack kg|27|
research and development our businesses are innovation-oriented and conduct research and development activities to develop new , and optimize existing , production technologies , as well as to develop commercially viable new products and applications . research and development expense was $ 86 million , $ 85 million and $ 104 million for the years ended december 31 , 2014 , 2013 and 2012 , respectively . we consider the amounts spent during each of the last three fiscal years on research and development activities to be sufficient to execute our current strategic initiatives . intellectual property we attach importance to protecting our intellectual property , including safeguarding our confidential information and through our patents , trademarks and copyrights , in order to preserve our investment in research and development , manufacturing and marketing . patents may cover processes , equipment , products , intermediate products and product uses . we also seek to register trademarks as a means of protecting the brand names of our company and products . patents . in most industrial countries , patent protection exists for new substances and formulations , as well as for certain unique applications and production processes . however , we do business in regions of the world where intellectual property protection may be limited and difficult to enforce . confidential information . we maintain stringent information security policies and procedures wherever we do business . such information security policies and procedures include data encryption , controls over the disclosure and safekeeping of confidential information and trade secrets , as well as employee awareness training . trademarks . aoplus ae , aoplus ae2 , aoplus ae3 , ateva ae , avicor ae , britecoat ae , celanese ae , celanex ae , celcon ae , celfx 2122 , celstran ae , celvolit ae , clarifoil ae , duroset ae , ecovae ae , factor ae , fortron ae , gur ae , hostaform ae , impet ae , mowilith ae , nutrinova ae , qorus 2122 , riteflex ae , sunett ae , tcx 2122 , thermx ae , tufcor ae , vantage ae , vantageplus 2122 , vantage ae2 , vectra ae , vinamul ae , vitaldose ae , zenite ae and certain other branded products and services named in this document are registered or reserved trademarks or service marks owned or licensed by celanese . the foregoing is not intended to be an exhaustive or comprehensive list of all registered or reserved trademarks and service marks owned or licensed by celanese . fortron ae is a registered trademark of fortron industries llc. .
Question: what is the growth rate in research and development expenses from 2012 to 2013? |
Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: troubled debt restructurings ( tdrs ) a tdr is a loan whose terms have been restructured in a manner that grants a concession to a borrower experiencing financial difficulty . tdrs result from our loss mitigation activities , and include rate reductions , principal forgiveness , postponement/reduction of scheduled amortization , and extensions , which are intended to minimize economic loss and to avoid foreclosure or repossession of collateral . additionally , tdrs also result from borrowers that have been discharged from personal liability through chapter 7 bankruptcy and have not formally reaffirmed their loan obligations to pnc . in those situations where principal is forgiven , the amount of such principal forgiveness is immediately charged off . some tdrs may not ultimately result in the full collection of principal and interest , as restructured , and result in potential incremental losses . these potential incremental losses have been factored into our overall alll estimate . the level of any subsequent defaults will likely be affected by future economic conditions . once a loan becomes a tdr , it will continue to be reported as a tdr until it is ultimately repaid in full , the collateral is foreclosed upon , or it is fully charged off . we held specific reserves in the alll of $ .3 billion and $ .4 billion at december 31 , 2015 and december 31 , 2014 , respectively , for the total tdr portfolio . table 61 : summary of troubled debt restructurings in millions december 31 december 31 .
|in millions|december 312015|december 312014|
|total consumer lending|$ 1917|$ 2041|
|total commercial lending|434|542|
|total tdrs|$ 2351|$ 2583|
|nonperforming|$ 1119|$ 1370|
|accruing ( a )|1232|1213|
|total tdrs|$ 2351|$ 2583|
( a ) accruing loans include consumer credit card loans and loans that have demonstrated a period of at least six months of performance under the restructured terms and are excluded from nonperforming loans . loans where borrowers have been discharged from personal liability through chapter 7 bankruptcy and have not formally reaffirmed their loan obligations to pnc and loans to borrowers not currently obligated to make both principal and interest payments under the restructured terms are not returned to accrual status . table 62 quantifies the number of loans that were classified as tdrs as well as the change in the recorded investments as a result of the tdr classification during the years 2015 , 2014 and 2013 respectively . additionally , the table provides information about the types of tdr concessions . the principal forgiveness tdr category includes principal forgiveness and accrued interest forgiveness . these types of tdrs result in a write down of the recorded investment and a charge-off if such action has not already taken place . the rate reduction tdr category includes reduced interest rate and interest deferral . the tdrs within this category result in reductions to future interest income . the other tdr category primarily includes consumer borrowers that have been discharged from personal liability through chapter 7 bankruptcy and have not formally reaffirmed their loan obligations to pnc , as well as postponement/reduction of scheduled amortization and contractual extensions for both consumer and commercial borrowers . in some cases , there have been multiple concessions granted on one loan . this is most common within the commercial loan portfolio . when there have been multiple concessions granted in the commercial loan portfolio , the principal forgiveness concession was prioritized for purposes of determining the inclusion in table 62 . for example , if there is principal forgiveness in conjunction with lower interest rate and postponement of amortization , the type of concession will be reported as principal forgiveness . second in priority would be rate reduction . for example , if there is an interest rate reduction in conjunction with postponement of amortization , the type of concession will be reported as a rate reduction . in the event that multiple concessions are granted on a consumer loan , concessions resulting from discharge from personal liability through chapter 7 bankruptcy without formal affirmation of the loan obligations to pnc would be prioritized and included in the other type of concession in the table below . after that , consumer loan concessions would follow the previously discussed priority of concessions for the commercial loan portfolio . 136 the pnc financial services group , inc . 2013 form 10-k .
Question: what was the change in specific reserves in alll between december 31 , 2015 and december 31 , 2014 in billions? | -0.1 | ### Transformed FinQA Question Generation Instructions
#### Step 1: Analyze and Understand the Original FinQA Question
- Objective: Use the given FinQA question to generate a new, logically similar but numerically different question.
- Guidelines:
- Identify the financial concepts and quantitative reasoning in the original question.
- Determine the key variables (e.g., revenue, profit, growth rate, interest) and their relationships.
- Maintain the original question’s structure and complexity.
#### Step 2: Transform and Adapt
- Objective: Create a new FinQA-style question while modifying numerical values and conditions.
- Guidelines:
- Change financial figures, constraints, or business conditions to create a unique question.
- Ensure the transformation maintains financial realism (e.g., realistic market trends, interest rates).
- Retain the original reasoning and computational steps while introducing fresh data points.
#### Step 3: Generate the New FinQA Question
- Objective: Output an original, transformed FinQA question without providing an answer or solution.
- Guidelines:
- Ensure the new question aligns with FinQA’s format and complexity.
- Maintain clarity and well-defined financial relationships.
### Response Rule
- **Generate only the "Transformed FinQA Question" for the given example without including any answer, explanation, or solution.**
### Output Format
#### Transformed FinQA Question: [Write your transformed FinQA question here.]
----
#### Task
#### Original FinQA Question: Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: troubled debt restructurings ( tdrs ) a tdr is a loan whose terms have been restructured in a manner that grants a concession to a borrower experiencing financial difficulty . tdrs result from our loss mitigation activities , and include rate reductions , principal forgiveness , postponement/reduction of scheduled amortization , and extensions , which are intended to minimize economic loss and to avoid foreclosure or repossession of collateral . additionally , tdrs also result from borrowers that have been discharged from personal liability through chapter 7 bankruptcy and have not formally reaffirmed their loan obligations to pnc . in those situations where principal is forgiven , the amount of such principal forgiveness is immediately charged off . some tdrs may not ultimately result in the full collection of principal and interest , as restructured , and result in potential incremental losses . these potential incremental losses have been factored into our overall alll estimate . the level of any subsequent defaults will likely be affected by future economic conditions . once a loan becomes a tdr , it will continue to be reported as a tdr until it is ultimately repaid in full , the collateral is foreclosed upon , or it is fully charged off . we held specific reserves in the alll of $ .3 billion and $ .4 billion at december 31 , 2015 and december 31 , 2014 , respectively , for the total tdr portfolio . table 61 : summary of troubled debt restructurings in millions december 31 december 31 .
|in millions|december 312015|december 312014|
|total consumer lending|$ 1917|$ 2041|
|total commercial lending|434|542|
|total tdrs|$ 2351|$ 2583|
|nonperforming|$ 1119|$ 1370|
|accruing ( a )|1232|1213|
|total tdrs|$ 2351|$ 2583|
( a ) accruing loans include consumer credit card loans and loans that have demonstrated a period of at least six months of performance under the restructured terms and are excluded from nonperforming loans . loans where borrowers have been discharged from personal liability through chapter 7 bankruptcy and have not formally reaffirmed their loan obligations to pnc and loans to borrowers not currently obligated to make both principal and interest payments under the restructured terms are not returned to accrual status . table 62 quantifies the number of loans that were classified as tdrs as well as the change in the recorded investments as a result of the tdr classification during the years 2015 , 2014 and 2013 respectively . additionally , the table provides information about the types of tdr concessions . the principal forgiveness tdr category includes principal forgiveness and accrued interest forgiveness . these types of tdrs result in a write down of the recorded investment and a charge-off if such action has not already taken place . the rate reduction tdr category includes reduced interest rate and interest deferral . the tdrs within this category result in reductions to future interest income . the other tdr category primarily includes consumer borrowers that have been discharged from personal liability through chapter 7 bankruptcy and have not formally reaffirmed their loan obligations to pnc , as well as postponement/reduction of scheduled amortization and contractual extensions for both consumer and commercial borrowers . in some cases , there have been multiple concessions granted on one loan . this is most common within the commercial loan portfolio . when there have been multiple concessions granted in the commercial loan portfolio , the principal forgiveness concession was prioritized for purposes of determining the inclusion in table 62 . for example , if there is principal forgiveness in conjunction with lower interest rate and postponement of amortization , the type of concession will be reported as principal forgiveness . second in priority would be rate reduction . for example , if there is an interest rate reduction in conjunction with postponement of amortization , the type of concession will be reported as a rate reduction . in the event that multiple concessions are granted on a consumer loan , concessions resulting from discharge from personal liability through chapter 7 bankruptcy without formal affirmation of the loan obligations to pnc would be prioritized and included in the other type of concession in the table below . after that , consumer loan concessions would follow the previously discussed priority of concessions for the commercial loan portfolio . 136 the pnc financial services group , inc . 2013 form 10-k .
Question: what was the change in specific reserves in alll between december 31 , 2015 and december 31 , 2014 in billions? |
Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: l iquidity and capital resources we have historically generated positive cash flow from operations and have generally used funds generated from operations and short-term borrowings on our revolving credit facility to meet capital requirements . we expect this trend to continue in the future . the company's cash and cash equivalents decreased to $ 65565 at june 30 , 2008 from $ 88617 at june 30 , 2007 . the following table summarizes net cash from operating activities in the statement of cash flows : year ended june 30 cash provided by operations increased $ 6754 to $ 181001 for the fiscal year ended june 30 , 2008 as compared to $ 174247 for the fiscal year ended june 30 , 2007 . this increase is primarily attributable to an increase in expenses that do not have a corresponding cash outflow , such as depreciation and amortization , as a percentage of total net income . cash used in investing activities for the fiscal year ended june 2008 was $ 102148 and includes payments for acquisitions of $ 48109 , plus $ 1215 in contingent consideration paid on prior years 2019 acquisitions . during fiscal 2007 , payments for acquisitions totaled $ 34006 , plus $ 5301 paid on earn-outs and other acquisition adjustments . capital expenditures for fiscal 2008 were $ 31105 compared to $ 34202 for fiscal 2007 . cash used for software development in fiscal 2008 was $ 23736 compared to $ 20743 during the prior year . net cash used in financing activities for the current fiscal year was $ 101905 and includes the repurchase of 4200 shares of our common stock for $ 100996 , the payment of dividends of $ 24683 and $ 429 net repayment on our revolving credit facilities . cash used in financing activities was partially offset by proceeds of $ 20394 from the exercise of stock options and the sale of common stock and $ 3809 excess tax benefits from stock option exercises . during fiscal 2007 , net cash used in financing activities included the repurchase of our common stock for $ 98413 and the payment of dividends of $ 21685 . as in the current year , cash used in fiscal 2007 was partially offset by proceeds from the exercise of stock options and the sale of common stock of $ 29212 , $ 4640 excess tax benefits from stock option exercises and $ 19388 net borrowings on revolving credit facilities . at june 30 , 2008 , the company had negative working capital of $ 11418 ; however , the largest component of current liabilities was deferred revenue of $ 212375 . the cash outlay necessary to provide the services related to these deferred revenues is significantly less than this recorded balance . therefore , we do not anticipate any liquidity problems to result from this condition . u.s . financial markets and many of the largest u.s . financial institutions have recently been shaken by negative developments in the home mortgage industry and the mortgage markets , and particularly the markets for subprime mortgage-backed securities . while we believe it is too early to predict what effect , if any , these developments may have , we have not experienced any significant issues with our current collec- tion efforts , and we believe that any future impact to our liquidity would be minimized by our access to available lines of credit . 2008 2007 2006 .
|2007|year ended june 30 2008 2007|year ended june 30 2008 2007|year ended june 30 2008|
|net income|$ 104222|$ 104681|$ 89923|
|non-cash expenses|70420|56348|52788|
|change in receivables|-2913 ( 2913 )|-28853 ( 28853 )|30413|
|change in deferred revenue|5100|24576|10561|
|change in other assets and liabilities|4172|17495|-14247 ( 14247 )|
|net cash from operating activities|$ 181001|$ 174247|$ 169438|
.
Question: what was change in millions of cash used for software development in fiscal 2008 compared to the prior year? | 2993.0 | ### Transformed FinQA Question Generation Instructions
#### Step 1: Analyze and Understand the Original FinQA Question
- Objective: Use the given FinQA question to generate a new, logically similar but numerically different question.
- Guidelines:
- Identify the financial concepts and quantitative reasoning in the original question.
- Determine the key variables (e.g., revenue, profit, growth rate, interest) and their relationships.
- Maintain the original question’s structure and complexity.
#### Step 2: Transform and Adapt
- Objective: Create a new FinQA-style question while modifying numerical values and conditions.
- Guidelines:
- Change financial figures, constraints, or business conditions to create a unique question.
- Ensure the transformation maintains financial realism (e.g., realistic market trends, interest rates).
- Retain the original reasoning and computational steps while introducing fresh data points.
#### Step 3: Generate the New FinQA Question
- Objective: Output an original, transformed FinQA question without providing an answer or solution.
- Guidelines:
- Ensure the new question aligns with FinQA’s format and complexity.
- Maintain clarity and well-defined financial relationships.
### Response Rule
- **Generate only the "Transformed FinQA Question" for the given example without including any answer, explanation, or solution.**
### Output Format
#### Transformed FinQA Question: [Write your transformed FinQA question here.]
----
#### Task
#### Original FinQA Question: Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: l iquidity and capital resources we have historically generated positive cash flow from operations and have generally used funds generated from operations and short-term borrowings on our revolving credit facility to meet capital requirements . we expect this trend to continue in the future . the company's cash and cash equivalents decreased to $ 65565 at june 30 , 2008 from $ 88617 at june 30 , 2007 . the following table summarizes net cash from operating activities in the statement of cash flows : year ended june 30 cash provided by operations increased $ 6754 to $ 181001 for the fiscal year ended june 30 , 2008 as compared to $ 174247 for the fiscal year ended june 30 , 2007 . this increase is primarily attributable to an increase in expenses that do not have a corresponding cash outflow , such as depreciation and amortization , as a percentage of total net income . cash used in investing activities for the fiscal year ended june 2008 was $ 102148 and includes payments for acquisitions of $ 48109 , plus $ 1215 in contingent consideration paid on prior years 2019 acquisitions . during fiscal 2007 , payments for acquisitions totaled $ 34006 , plus $ 5301 paid on earn-outs and other acquisition adjustments . capital expenditures for fiscal 2008 were $ 31105 compared to $ 34202 for fiscal 2007 . cash used for software development in fiscal 2008 was $ 23736 compared to $ 20743 during the prior year . net cash used in financing activities for the current fiscal year was $ 101905 and includes the repurchase of 4200 shares of our common stock for $ 100996 , the payment of dividends of $ 24683 and $ 429 net repayment on our revolving credit facilities . cash used in financing activities was partially offset by proceeds of $ 20394 from the exercise of stock options and the sale of common stock and $ 3809 excess tax benefits from stock option exercises . during fiscal 2007 , net cash used in financing activities included the repurchase of our common stock for $ 98413 and the payment of dividends of $ 21685 . as in the current year , cash used in fiscal 2007 was partially offset by proceeds from the exercise of stock options and the sale of common stock of $ 29212 , $ 4640 excess tax benefits from stock option exercises and $ 19388 net borrowings on revolving credit facilities . at june 30 , 2008 , the company had negative working capital of $ 11418 ; however , the largest component of current liabilities was deferred revenue of $ 212375 . the cash outlay necessary to provide the services related to these deferred revenues is significantly less than this recorded balance . therefore , we do not anticipate any liquidity problems to result from this condition . u.s . financial markets and many of the largest u.s . financial institutions have recently been shaken by negative developments in the home mortgage industry and the mortgage markets , and particularly the markets for subprime mortgage-backed securities . while we believe it is too early to predict what effect , if any , these developments may have , we have not experienced any significant issues with our current collec- tion efforts , and we believe that any future impact to our liquidity would be minimized by our access to available lines of credit . 2008 2007 2006 .
|2007|year ended june 30 2008 2007|year ended june 30 2008 2007|year ended june 30 2008|
|net income|$ 104222|$ 104681|$ 89923|
|non-cash expenses|70420|56348|52788|
|change in receivables|-2913 ( 2913 )|-28853 ( 28853 )|30413|
|change in deferred revenue|5100|24576|10561|
|change in other assets and liabilities|4172|17495|-14247 ( 14247 )|
|net cash from operating activities|$ 181001|$ 174247|$ 169438|
.
Question: what was change in millions of cash used for software development in fiscal 2008 compared to the prior year? |
Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: notes to consolidated financial statements sumitomo mitsui financial group , inc . ( smfg ) provides the firm with credit loss protection on certain approved loan commitments ( primarily investment-grade commercial lending commitments ) . the notional amount of such loan commitments was $ 32.41 billion and $ 31.94 billion as of december 2012 and december 2011 , respectively . the credit loss protection on loan commitments provided by smfg is generally limited to 95% ( 95 % ) of the first loss the firm realizes on such commitments , up to a maximum of approximately $ 950 million . in addition , subject to the satisfaction of certain conditions , upon the firm 2019s request , smfg will provide protection for 70% ( 70 % ) of additional losses on such commitments , up to a maximum of $ 1.13 billion , of which $ 300 million of protection had been provided as of both december 2012 and december 2011 . the firm also uses other financial instruments to mitigate credit risks related to certain commitments not covered by smfg . these instruments primarily include credit default swaps that reference the same or similar underlying instrument or entity or credit default swaps that reference a market index . warehouse financing . the firm provides financing to clients who warehouse financial assets . these arrangements are secured by the warehoused assets , primarily consisting of commercial mortgage loans . contingent and forward starting resale and securities borrowing agreements/forward starting repurchase and secured lending agreements the firm enters into resale and securities borrowing agreements and repurchase and secured lending agreements that settle at a future date . the firm also enters into commitments to provide contingent financing to its clients and counterparties through resale agreements . the firm 2019s funding of these commitments depends on the satisfaction of all contractual conditions to the resale agreement and these commitments can expire unused . investment commitments the firm 2019s investment commitments consist of commitments to invest in private equity , real estate and other assets directly and through funds that the firm raises and manages . these commitments include $ 872 million and $ 1.62 billion as of december 2012 and december 2011 , respectively , related to real estate private investments and $ 6.47 billion and $ 7.50 billion as of december 2012 and december 2011 , respectively , related to corporate and other private investments . of these amounts , $ 6.21 billion and $ 8.38 billion as of december 2012 and december 2011 , respectively , relate to commitments to invest in funds managed by the firm , which will be funded at market value on the date of investment . leases the firm has contractual obligations under long-term noncancelable lease agreements , principally for office space , expiring on various dates through 2069 . certain agreements are subject to periodic escalation provisions for increases in real estate taxes and other charges . the table below presents future minimum rental payments , net of minimum sublease rentals . in millions december 2012 .
|in millions|as of december 2012|
|2013|$ 439|
|2014|407|
|2015|345|
|2016|317|
|2017|306|
|2018 - thereafter|1375|
|total|$ 3189|
rent charged to operating expense for the years ended december 2012 , december 2011 and december 2010 was $ 374 million , $ 475 million and $ 508 million , respectively . operating leases include office space held in excess of current requirements . rent expense relating to space held for growth is included in 201coccupancy . 201d the firm records a liability , based on the fair value of the remaining lease rentals reduced by any potential or existing sublease rentals , for leases where the firm has ceased using the space and management has concluded that the firm will not derive any future economic benefits . costs to terminate a lease before the end of its term are recognized and measured at fair value on termination . goldman sachs 2012 annual report 175 .
Question: what percentage of future minimum rental payments is due after 2017? | 0.43117 | ### Transformed FinQA Question Generation Instructions
#### Step 1: Analyze and Understand the Original FinQA Question
- Objective: Use the given FinQA question to generate a new, logically similar but numerically different question.
- Guidelines:
- Identify the financial concepts and quantitative reasoning in the original question.
- Determine the key variables (e.g., revenue, profit, growth rate, interest) and their relationships.
- Maintain the original question’s structure and complexity.
#### Step 2: Transform and Adapt
- Objective: Create a new FinQA-style question while modifying numerical values and conditions.
- Guidelines:
- Change financial figures, constraints, or business conditions to create a unique question.
- Ensure the transformation maintains financial realism (e.g., realistic market trends, interest rates).
- Retain the original reasoning and computational steps while introducing fresh data points.
#### Step 3: Generate the New FinQA Question
- Objective: Output an original, transformed FinQA question without providing an answer or solution.
- Guidelines:
- Ensure the new question aligns with FinQA’s format and complexity.
- Maintain clarity and well-defined financial relationships.
### Response Rule
- **Generate only the "Transformed FinQA Question" for the given example without including any answer, explanation, or solution.**
### Output Format
#### Transformed FinQA Question: [Write your transformed FinQA question here.]
----
#### Task
#### Original FinQA Question: Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: notes to consolidated financial statements sumitomo mitsui financial group , inc . ( smfg ) provides the firm with credit loss protection on certain approved loan commitments ( primarily investment-grade commercial lending commitments ) . the notional amount of such loan commitments was $ 32.41 billion and $ 31.94 billion as of december 2012 and december 2011 , respectively . the credit loss protection on loan commitments provided by smfg is generally limited to 95% ( 95 % ) of the first loss the firm realizes on such commitments , up to a maximum of approximately $ 950 million . in addition , subject to the satisfaction of certain conditions , upon the firm 2019s request , smfg will provide protection for 70% ( 70 % ) of additional losses on such commitments , up to a maximum of $ 1.13 billion , of which $ 300 million of protection had been provided as of both december 2012 and december 2011 . the firm also uses other financial instruments to mitigate credit risks related to certain commitments not covered by smfg . these instruments primarily include credit default swaps that reference the same or similar underlying instrument or entity or credit default swaps that reference a market index . warehouse financing . the firm provides financing to clients who warehouse financial assets . these arrangements are secured by the warehoused assets , primarily consisting of commercial mortgage loans . contingent and forward starting resale and securities borrowing agreements/forward starting repurchase and secured lending agreements the firm enters into resale and securities borrowing agreements and repurchase and secured lending agreements that settle at a future date . the firm also enters into commitments to provide contingent financing to its clients and counterparties through resale agreements . the firm 2019s funding of these commitments depends on the satisfaction of all contractual conditions to the resale agreement and these commitments can expire unused . investment commitments the firm 2019s investment commitments consist of commitments to invest in private equity , real estate and other assets directly and through funds that the firm raises and manages . these commitments include $ 872 million and $ 1.62 billion as of december 2012 and december 2011 , respectively , related to real estate private investments and $ 6.47 billion and $ 7.50 billion as of december 2012 and december 2011 , respectively , related to corporate and other private investments . of these amounts , $ 6.21 billion and $ 8.38 billion as of december 2012 and december 2011 , respectively , relate to commitments to invest in funds managed by the firm , which will be funded at market value on the date of investment . leases the firm has contractual obligations under long-term noncancelable lease agreements , principally for office space , expiring on various dates through 2069 . certain agreements are subject to periodic escalation provisions for increases in real estate taxes and other charges . the table below presents future minimum rental payments , net of minimum sublease rentals . in millions december 2012 .
|in millions|as of december 2012|
|2013|$ 439|
|2014|407|
|2015|345|
|2016|317|
|2017|306|
|2018 - thereafter|1375|
|total|$ 3189|
rent charged to operating expense for the years ended december 2012 , december 2011 and december 2010 was $ 374 million , $ 475 million and $ 508 million , respectively . operating leases include office space held in excess of current requirements . rent expense relating to space held for growth is included in 201coccupancy . 201d the firm records a liability , based on the fair value of the remaining lease rentals reduced by any potential or existing sublease rentals , for leases where the firm has ceased using the space and management has concluded that the firm will not derive any future economic benefits . costs to terminate a lease before the end of its term are recognized and measured at fair value on termination . goldman sachs 2012 annual report 175 .
Question: what percentage of future minimum rental payments is due after 2017? |
Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: 38 2015 ppg annual report and form 10-k notes to the consolidated financial statements 1 . summary of significant accounting policies principles of consolidation the accompanying consolidated financial statements include the accounts of ppg industries , inc . ( 201cppg 201d or the 201ccompany 201d ) and all subsidiaries , both u.s . and non-u.s. , that it controls . ppg owns more than 50% ( 50 % ) of the voting stock of most of the subsidiaries that it controls . for those consolidated subsidiaries in which the company 2019s ownership is less than 100% ( 100 % ) , the outside shareholders 2019 interests are shown as noncontrolling interests . investments in companies in which ppg owns 20% ( 20 % ) to 50% ( 50 % ) of the voting stock and has the ability to exercise significant influence over operating and financial policies of the investee are accounted for using the equity method of accounting . as a result , ppg 2019s share of the earnings or losses of such equity affiliates is included in the accompanying consolidated statement of income and ppg 2019s share of these companies 2019 shareholders 2019 equity is included in 201cinvestments 201d in the accompanying consolidated balance sheet . transactions between ppg and its subsidiaries are eliminated in consolidation . use of estimates in the preparation of financial statements the preparation of financial statements in conformity with u.s . generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements , as well as the reported amounts of income and expenses during the reporting period . such estimates also include the fair value of assets acquired and liabilities assumed resulting from the allocation of the purchase price related to business combinations consummated . actual outcomes could differ from those estimates . revenue recognition the company recognizes revenue when the earnings process is complete . revenue from sales is recognized by all operating segments when goods are shipped and title to inventory and risk of loss passes to the customer or when services have been rendered . shipping and handling costs amounts billed to customers for shipping and handling are reported in 201cnet sales 201d in the accompanying consolidated statement of income . shipping and handling costs incurred by the company for the delivery of goods to customers are included in 201ccost of sales , exclusive of depreciation and amortization 201d in the accompanying consolidated statement of income . selling , general and administrative costs amounts presented as 201cselling , general and administrative 201d in the accompanying consolidated statement of income are comprised of selling , customer service , distribution and advertising costs , as well as the costs of providing corporate- wide functional support in such areas as finance , law , human resources and planning . distribution costs pertain to the movement and storage of finished goods inventory at company- owned and leased warehouses , terminals and other distribution facilities . advertising costs advertising costs are expensed as incurred and totaled $ 324 million , $ 297 million and $ 235 million in 2015 , 2014 and 2013 , respectively . research and development research and development costs , which consist primarily of employee related costs , are charged to expense as incurred. .
|( $ in millions )|2015|2014|2013|
|research and development 2013 total|$ 505|$ 509|$ 479|
|less depreciation on research facilities|19|17|16|
|research and development net|$ 486|$ 492|$ 463|
legal costs legal costs , primarily include costs associated with acquisition and divestiture transactions , general litigation , environmental regulation compliance , patent and trademark protection and other general corporate purposes , are charged to expense as incurred . foreign currency translation the functional currency of most significant non-u.s . operations is their local currency . assets and liabilities of those operations are translated into u.s . dollars using year-end exchange rates ; income and expenses are translated using the average exchange rates for the reporting period . unrealized foreign currency translation adjustments are deferred in accumulated other comprehensive loss , a separate component of shareholders 2019 equity . cash equivalents cash equivalents are highly liquid investments ( valued at cost , which approximates fair value ) acquired with an original maturity of three months or less . short-term investments short-term investments are highly liquid , high credit quality investments ( valued at cost plus accrued interest ) that have stated maturities of greater than three months to one year . the purchases and sales of these investments are classified as investing activities in the consolidated statement of cash flows . marketable equity securities the company 2019s investment in marketable equity securities is recorded at fair market value and reported in 201cother current assets 201d and 201cinvestments 201d in the accompanying consolidated balance sheet with changes in fair market value recorded in income for those securities designated as trading securities and in other comprehensive income , net of tax , for those designated as available for sale securities. .
Question: what were average advertising costs for the three year period , in millions? | 285.33333 | ### Transformed FinQA Question Generation Instructions
#### Step 1: Analyze and Understand the Original FinQA Question
- Objective: Use the given FinQA question to generate a new, logically similar but numerically different question.
- Guidelines:
- Identify the financial concepts and quantitative reasoning in the original question.
- Determine the key variables (e.g., revenue, profit, growth rate, interest) and their relationships.
- Maintain the original question’s structure and complexity.
#### Step 2: Transform and Adapt
- Objective: Create a new FinQA-style question while modifying numerical values and conditions.
- Guidelines:
- Change financial figures, constraints, or business conditions to create a unique question.
- Ensure the transformation maintains financial realism (e.g., realistic market trends, interest rates).
- Retain the original reasoning and computational steps while introducing fresh data points.
#### Step 3: Generate the New FinQA Question
- Objective: Output an original, transformed FinQA question without providing an answer or solution.
- Guidelines:
- Ensure the new question aligns with FinQA’s format and complexity.
- Maintain clarity and well-defined financial relationships.
### Response Rule
- **Generate only the "Transformed FinQA Question" for the given example without including any answer, explanation, or solution.**
### Output Format
#### Transformed FinQA Question: [Write your transformed FinQA question here.]
----
#### Task
#### Original FinQA Question: Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: 38 2015 ppg annual report and form 10-k notes to the consolidated financial statements 1 . summary of significant accounting policies principles of consolidation the accompanying consolidated financial statements include the accounts of ppg industries , inc . ( 201cppg 201d or the 201ccompany 201d ) and all subsidiaries , both u.s . and non-u.s. , that it controls . ppg owns more than 50% ( 50 % ) of the voting stock of most of the subsidiaries that it controls . for those consolidated subsidiaries in which the company 2019s ownership is less than 100% ( 100 % ) , the outside shareholders 2019 interests are shown as noncontrolling interests . investments in companies in which ppg owns 20% ( 20 % ) to 50% ( 50 % ) of the voting stock and has the ability to exercise significant influence over operating and financial policies of the investee are accounted for using the equity method of accounting . as a result , ppg 2019s share of the earnings or losses of such equity affiliates is included in the accompanying consolidated statement of income and ppg 2019s share of these companies 2019 shareholders 2019 equity is included in 201cinvestments 201d in the accompanying consolidated balance sheet . transactions between ppg and its subsidiaries are eliminated in consolidation . use of estimates in the preparation of financial statements the preparation of financial statements in conformity with u.s . generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements , as well as the reported amounts of income and expenses during the reporting period . such estimates also include the fair value of assets acquired and liabilities assumed resulting from the allocation of the purchase price related to business combinations consummated . actual outcomes could differ from those estimates . revenue recognition the company recognizes revenue when the earnings process is complete . revenue from sales is recognized by all operating segments when goods are shipped and title to inventory and risk of loss passes to the customer or when services have been rendered . shipping and handling costs amounts billed to customers for shipping and handling are reported in 201cnet sales 201d in the accompanying consolidated statement of income . shipping and handling costs incurred by the company for the delivery of goods to customers are included in 201ccost of sales , exclusive of depreciation and amortization 201d in the accompanying consolidated statement of income . selling , general and administrative costs amounts presented as 201cselling , general and administrative 201d in the accompanying consolidated statement of income are comprised of selling , customer service , distribution and advertising costs , as well as the costs of providing corporate- wide functional support in such areas as finance , law , human resources and planning . distribution costs pertain to the movement and storage of finished goods inventory at company- owned and leased warehouses , terminals and other distribution facilities . advertising costs advertising costs are expensed as incurred and totaled $ 324 million , $ 297 million and $ 235 million in 2015 , 2014 and 2013 , respectively . research and development research and development costs , which consist primarily of employee related costs , are charged to expense as incurred. .
|( $ in millions )|2015|2014|2013|
|research and development 2013 total|$ 505|$ 509|$ 479|
|less depreciation on research facilities|19|17|16|
|research and development net|$ 486|$ 492|$ 463|
legal costs legal costs , primarily include costs associated with acquisition and divestiture transactions , general litigation , environmental regulation compliance , patent and trademark protection and other general corporate purposes , are charged to expense as incurred . foreign currency translation the functional currency of most significant non-u.s . operations is their local currency . assets and liabilities of those operations are translated into u.s . dollars using year-end exchange rates ; income and expenses are translated using the average exchange rates for the reporting period . unrealized foreign currency translation adjustments are deferred in accumulated other comprehensive loss , a separate component of shareholders 2019 equity . cash equivalents cash equivalents are highly liquid investments ( valued at cost , which approximates fair value ) acquired with an original maturity of three months or less . short-term investments short-term investments are highly liquid , high credit quality investments ( valued at cost plus accrued interest ) that have stated maturities of greater than three months to one year . the purchases and sales of these investments are classified as investing activities in the consolidated statement of cash flows . marketable equity securities the company 2019s investment in marketable equity securities is recorded at fair market value and reported in 201cother current assets 201d and 201cinvestments 201d in the accompanying consolidated balance sheet with changes in fair market value recorded in income for those securities designated as trading securities and in other comprehensive income , net of tax , for those designated as available for sale securities. .
Question: what were average advertising costs for the three year period , in millions? |
Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: levels during 2008 , an indication that efforts to improve network operations translated into better customer service . 2022 fuel prices 2013 crude oil prices increased at a steady rate through the first seven months of 2008 , closing at a record high of $ 145.29 a barrel in early july . as the economy worsened during the third and fourth quarters , fuel prices dropped dramatically , hitting $ 33.87 per barrel in december , a near five-year low . despite these price declines toward the end of the year , our 2008 average fuel price increased by 39% ( 39 % ) and added $ 1.1 billion of operating expenses compared to 2007 . our fuel surcharge programs helped offset the impact of higher fuel prices . in addition , we reduced our consumption rate by 4% ( 4 % ) , saving approximately 58 million gallons of fuel during the year . the use of newer , more fuel efficient locomotives ; our fuel conservation programs ; improved network operations ; and a shift in commodity mix , primarily due to growth in bulk shipments , contributed to the improvement . 2022 free cash flow 2013 cash generated by operating activities totaled a record $ 4.1 billion , yielding free cash flow of $ 825 million in 2008 . free cash flow is defined as cash provided by operating activities , less cash used in investing activities and dividends paid . free cash flow is not considered a financial measure under accounting principles generally accepted in the united states ( gaap ) by sec regulation g and item 10 of sec regulation s-k . we believe free cash flow is important in evaluating our financial performance and measures our ability to generate cash without additional external financings . free cash flow should be considered in addition to , rather than as a substitute for , cash provided by operating activities . the following table reconciles cash provided by operating activities ( gaap measure ) to free cash flow ( non-gaap measure ) : millions of dollars 2008 2007 2006 .
|millions of dollars|2008|2007|2006|
|cash provided by operating activities|$ 4070|$ 3277|$ 2880|
|cash used in investing activities|-2764 ( 2764 )|-2426 ( 2426 )|-2042 ( 2042 )|
|dividends paid|-481 ( 481 )|-364 ( 364 )|-322 ( 322 )|
|free cash flow|$ 825|$ 487|$ 516|
2009 outlook 2022 safety 2013 operating a safe railroad benefits our employees , our customers , our shareholders , and the public . we will continue using a multi-faceted approach to safety , utilizing technology , risk assessment , quality control , and training and engaging our employees . we plan to continue implementation of total safety culture ( tsc ) throughout our operations . tsc , an employee-focused initiative that has helped improve safety , is a process designed to establish , maintain , and promote safety among co-workers . with respect to public safety , we will continue our efforts to maintain , upgrade , and close crossings , install video cameras on locomotives , and educate the public about crossing safety through various railroad and industry programs , along with other activities . 2022 transportation plan 2013 in 2009 , we will continue to evaluate traffic flows and network logistic patterns to identify additional opportunities to simplify operations and improve network efficiency and asset utilization . we plan to maintain adequate manpower and locomotives , and improve productivity using industrial engineering techniques . 2022 fuel prices 2013 on average , we expect fuel prices to decrease substantially from the average price we paid in 2008 . however , due to economic uncertainty , other global pressures , and weather incidents , fuel prices again could be volatile during the year . to reduce the impact of fuel price on earnings , we .
Question: what was the percent of the cash provided by operating activities | 0.13785 | ### Transformed FinQA Question Generation Instructions
#### Step 1: Analyze and Understand the Original FinQA Question
- Objective: Use the given FinQA question to generate a new, logically similar but numerically different question.
- Guidelines:
- Identify the financial concepts and quantitative reasoning in the original question.
- Determine the key variables (e.g., revenue, profit, growth rate, interest) and their relationships.
- Maintain the original question’s structure and complexity.
#### Step 2: Transform and Adapt
- Objective: Create a new FinQA-style question while modifying numerical values and conditions.
- Guidelines:
- Change financial figures, constraints, or business conditions to create a unique question.
- Ensure the transformation maintains financial realism (e.g., realistic market trends, interest rates).
- Retain the original reasoning and computational steps while introducing fresh data points.
#### Step 3: Generate the New FinQA Question
- Objective: Output an original, transformed FinQA question without providing an answer or solution.
- Guidelines:
- Ensure the new question aligns with FinQA’s format and complexity.
- Maintain clarity and well-defined financial relationships.
### Response Rule
- **Generate only the "Transformed FinQA Question" for the given example without including any answer, explanation, or solution.**
### Output Format
#### Transformed FinQA Question: [Write your transformed FinQA question here.]
----
#### Task
#### Original FinQA Question: Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: levels during 2008 , an indication that efforts to improve network operations translated into better customer service . 2022 fuel prices 2013 crude oil prices increased at a steady rate through the first seven months of 2008 , closing at a record high of $ 145.29 a barrel in early july . as the economy worsened during the third and fourth quarters , fuel prices dropped dramatically , hitting $ 33.87 per barrel in december , a near five-year low . despite these price declines toward the end of the year , our 2008 average fuel price increased by 39% ( 39 % ) and added $ 1.1 billion of operating expenses compared to 2007 . our fuel surcharge programs helped offset the impact of higher fuel prices . in addition , we reduced our consumption rate by 4% ( 4 % ) , saving approximately 58 million gallons of fuel during the year . the use of newer , more fuel efficient locomotives ; our fuel conservation programs ; improved network operations ; and a shift in commodity mix , primarily due to growth in bulk shipments , contributed to the improvement . 2022 free cash flow 2013 cash generated by operating activities totaled a record $ 4.1 billion , yielding free cash flow of $ 825 million in 2008 . free cash flow is defined as cash provided by operating activities , less cash used in investing activities and dividends paid . free cash flow is not considered a financial measure under accounting principles generally accepted in the united states ( gaap ) by sec regulation g and item 10 of sec regulation s-k . we believe free cash flow is important in evaluating our financial performance and measures our ability to generate cash without additional external financings . free cash flow should be considered in addition to , rather than as a substitute for , cash provided by operating activities . the following table reconciles cash provided by operating activities ( gaap measure ) to free cash flow ( non-gaap measure ) : millions of dollars 2008 2007 2006 .
|millions of dollars|2008|2007|2006|
|cash provided by operating activities|$ 4070|$ 3277|$ 2880|
|cash used in investing activities|-2764 ( 2764 )|-2426 ( 2426 )|-2042 ( 2042 )|
|dividends paid|-481 ( 481 )|-364 ( 364 )|-322 ( 322 )|
|free cash flow|$ 825|$ 487|$ 516|
2009 outlook 2022 safety 2013 operating a safe railroad benefits our employees , our customers , our shareholders , and the public . we will continue using a multi-faceted approach to safety , utilizing technology , risk assessment , quality control , and training and engaging our employees . we plan to continue implementation of total safety culture ( tsc ) throughout our operations . tsc , an employee-focused initiative that has helped improve safety , is a process designed to establish , maintain , and promote safety among co-workers . with respect to public safety , we will continue our efforts to maintain , upgrade , and close crossings , install video cameras on locomotives , and educate the public about crossing safety through various railroad and industry programs , along with other activities . 2022 transportation plan 2013 in 2009 , we will continue to evaluate traffic flows and network logistic patterns to identify additional opportunities to simplify operations and improve network efficiency and asset utilization . we plan to maintain adequate manpower and locomotives , and improve productivity using industrial engineering techniques . 2022 fuel prices 2013 on average , we expect fuel prices to decrease substantially from the average price we paid in 2008 . however , due to economic uncertainty , other global pressures , and weather incidents , fuel prices again could be volatile during the year . to reduce the impact of fuel price on earnings , we .
Question: what was the percent of the cash provided by operating activities |
Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: valuation techniques 2013 cash equivalents are mostly comprised of short-term money-market instruments and are valued at cost , which approximates fair value . u.s . equity securities and international equity securities categorized as level 1 are traded on active national and international exchanges and are valued at their closing prices on the last trading day of the year . for u.s . equity securities and international equity securities not traded on an active exchange , or if the closing price is not available , the trustee obtains indicative quotes from a pricing vendor , broker , or investment manager . these securities are categorized as level 2 if the custodian obtains corroborated quotes from a pricing vendor or categorized as level 3 if the custodian obtains uncorroborated quotes from a broker or investment manager . commingled equity funds are investment vehicles valued using the net asset value ( nav ) provided by the fund managers . the nav is the total value of the fund divided by the number of shares outstanding . commingled equity funds are categorized as level 1 if traded at their nav on a nationally recognized securities exchange or categorized as level 2 if the nav is corroborated by observable market data ( e.g. , purchases or sales activity ) and we are able to redeem our investment in the near-term . fixed income investments categorized as level 2 are valued by the trustee using pricing models that use verifiable observable market data ( e.g. , interest rates and yield curves observable at commonly quoted intervals and credit spreads ) , bids provided by brokers or dealers , or quoted prices of securities with similar characteristics . fixed income investments are categorized at level 3 when valuations using observable inputs are unavailable . the trustee obtains pricing based on indicative quotes or bid evaluations from vendors , brokers , or the investment manager . private equity funds , real estate funds , and hedge funds are valued using the nav based on valuation models of underlying securities which generally include significant unobservable inputs that cannot be corroborated using verifiable observable market data . valuations for private equity funds and real estate funds are determined by the general partners . depending on the nature of the assets , the general partners may use various valuation methodologies , including the income and market approaches in their models . the market approach consists of analyzing market transactions for comparable assets while the income approach uses earnings or the net present value of estimated future cash flows adjusted for liquidity and other risk factors . hedge funds are valued by independent administrators using various pricing sources and models based on the nature of the securities . private equity funds , real estate funds , and hedge funds are generally categorized as level 3 as we cannot fully redeem our investment in the near-term . commodities are traded on an active commodity exchange and are valued at their closing prices on the last trading day of the year . contributions and expected benefit payments we generally determine funding requirements for our defined benefit pension plans in a manner consistent with cas and internal revenue code rules . in 2013 , we made contributions of $ 2.25 billion related to our qualified defined benefit pension plans . we currently plan to make contributions of approximately $ 1.0 billion related to the qualified defined benefit pension plans in 2014 . in 2013 , we made contributions of $ 98 million to our retiree medical and life insurance plans . we do not expect to make contributions related to the retiree medical and life insurance plans in 2014 as a result of our 2013 contributions . the following table presents estimated future benefit payments , which reflect expected future employee service , as of december 31 , 2013 ( in millions ) : .
||2014|2015|2016|2017|2018|2019 - 2023|
|qualified defined benefit pension plans|$ 1960|$ 2030|$ 2110|$ 2200|$ 2300|$ 13240|
|retiree medical and life insurance plans|200|210|210|220|220|1070|
defined contribution plans we maintain a number of defined contribution plans , most with 401 ( k ) features , that cover substantially all of our employees . under the provisions of our 401 ( k ) plans , we match most employees 2019 eligible contributions at rates specified in the plan documents . our contributions were $ 383 million in 2013 , $ 380 million in 2012 , and $ 378 million in 2011 , the majority of which were funded in our common stock . our defined contribution plans held approximately 44.7 million and 48.6 million shares of our common stock as of december 31 , 2013 and 2012. .
Question: what is the change in estimated future benefit payments , which reflect expected future employee service , as of december 31 , 2013 , from 2014 to 2015 in millions? | 70.0 | ### Transformed FinQA Question Generation Instructions
#### Step 1: Analyze and Understand the Original FinQA Question
- Objective: Use the given FinQA question to generate a new, logically similar but numerically different question.
- Guidelines:
- Identify the financial concepts and quantitative reasoning in the original question.
- Determine the key variables (e.g., revenue, profit, growth rate, interest) and their relationships.
- Maintain the original question’s structure and complexity.
#### Step 2: Transform and Adapt
- Objective: Create a new FinQA-style question while modifying numerical values and conditions.
- Guidelines:
- Change financial figures, constraints, or business conditions to create a unique question.
- Ensure the transformation maintains financial realism (e.g., realistic market trends, interest rates).
- Retain the original reasoning and computational steps while introducing fresh data points.
#### Step 3: Generate the New FinQA Question
- Objective: Output an original, transformed FinQA question without providing an answer or solution.
- Guidelines:
- Ensure the new question aligns with FinQA’s format and complexity.
- Maintain clarity and well-defined financial relationships.
### Response Rule
- **Generate only the "Transformed FinQA Question" for the given example without including any answer, explanation, or solution.**
### Output Format
#### Transformed FinQA Question: [Write your transformed FinQA question here.]
----
#### Task
#### Original FinQA Question: Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: valuation techniques 2013 cash equivalents are mostly comprised of short-term money-market instruments and are valued at cost , which approximates fair value . u.s . equity securities and international equity securities categorized as level 1 are traded on active national and international exchanges and are valued at their closing prices on the last trading day of the year . for u.s . equity securities and international equity securities not traded on an active exchange , or if the closing price is not available , the trustee obtains indicative quotes from a pricing vendor , broker , or investment manager . these securities are categorized as level 2 if the custodian obtains corroborated quotes from a pricing vendor or categorized as level 3 if the custodian obtains uncorroborated quotes from a broker or investment manager . commingled equity funds are investment vehicles valued using the net asset value ( nav ) provided by the fund managers . the nav is the total value of the fund divided by the number of shares outstanding . commingled equity funds are categorized as level 1 if traded at their nav on a nationally recognized securities exchange or categorized as level 2 if the nav is corroborated by observable market data ( e.g. , purchases or sales activity ) and we are able to redeem our investment in the near-term . fixed income investments categorized as level 2 are valued by the trustee using pricing models that use verifiable observable market data ( e.g. , interest rates and yield curves observable at commonly quoted intervals and credit spreads ) , bids provided by brokers or dealers , or quoted prices of securities with similar characteristics . fixed income investments are categorized at level 3 when valuations using observable inputs are unavailable . the trustee obtains pricing based on indicative quotes or bid evaluations from vendors , brokers , or the investment manager . private equity funds , real estate funds , and hedge funds are valued using the nav based on valuation models of underlying securities which generally include significant unobservable inputs that cannot be corroborated using verifiable observable market data . valuations for private equity funds and real estate funds are determined by the general partners . depending on the nature of the assets , the general partners may use various valuation methodologies , including the income and market approaches in their models . the market approach consists of analyzing market transactions for comparable assets while the income approach uses earnings or the net present value of estimated future cash flows adjusted for liquidity and other risk factors . hedge funds are valued by independent administrators using various pricing sources and models based on the nature of the securities . private equity funds , real estate funds , and hedge funds are generally categorized as level 3 as we cannot fully redeem our investment in the near-term . commodities are traded on an active commodity exchange and are valued at their closing prices on the last trading day of the year . contributions and expected benefit payments we generally determine funding requirements for our defined benefit pension plans in a manner consistent with cas and internal revenue code rules . in 2013 , we made contributions of $ 2.25 billion related to our qualified defined benefit pension plans . we currently plan to make contributions of approximately $ 1.0 billion related to the qualified defined benefit pension plans in 2014 . in 2013 , we made contributions of $ 98 million to our retiree medical and life insurance plans . we do not expect to make contributions related to the retiree medical and life insurance plans in 2014 as a result of our 2013 contributions . the following table presents estimated future benefit payments , which reflect expected future employee service , as of december 31 , 2013 ( in millions ) : .
||2014|2015|2016|2017|2018|2019 - 2023|
|qualified defined benefit pension plans|$ 1960|$ 2030|$ 2110|$ 2200|$ 2300|$ 13240|
|retiree medical and life insurance plans|200|210|210|220|220|1070|
defined contribution plans we maintain a number of defined contribution plans , most with 401 ( k ) features , that cover substantially all of our employees . under the provisions of our 401 ( k ) plans , we match most employees 2019 eligible contributions at rates specified in the plan documents . our contributions were $ 383 million in 2013 , $ 380 million in 2012 , and $ 378 million in 2011 , the majority of which were funded in our common stock . our defined contribution plans held approximately 44.7 million and 48.6 million shares of our common stock as of december 31 , 2013 and 2012. .
Question: what is the change in estimated future benefit payments , which reflect expected future employee service , as of december 31 , 2013 , from 2014 to 2015 in millions? |
Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: n o t e s t o t h e c o n s o l i d a t e d f i n a n c i a l s t a t e m e n t s ( continued ) ace limited and subsidiaries 20 . statutory financial information the company 2019s insurance and reinsurance subsidiaries are subject to insurance laws and regulations in the jurisdictions in which they operate . these regulations include restrictions that limit the amount of dividends or other distributions , such as loans or cash advances , available to shareholders without prior approval of the insurance regulatory authorities . there are no statutory restrictions on the payment of dividends from retained earnings by any of the bermuda subsidiaries as the minimum statutory capital and surplus requirements are satisfied by the share capital and additional paid-in capital of each of the bermuda subsidiaries . the company 2019s u.s . subsidiaries file financial statements prepared in accordance with statutory accounting practices prescribed or permitted by insurance regulators . statutory accounting differs from gaap in the reporting of certain reinsurance contracts , investments , subsidiaries , acquis- ition expenses , fixed assets , deferred income taxes , and certain other items . the statutory capital and surplus of the u.s . subsidiaries met regulatory requirements for 2009 , 2008 , and 2007 . the amount of dividends available to be paid in 2010 , without prior approval from the state insurance departments , totals $ 733 million . the combined statutory capital and surplus and statutory net income of the bermuda and u.s . subsidiaries as at and for the years ended december 31 , 2009 , 2008 , and 2007 , are as follows: .
|( in millions of u.s . dollars )|bermuda subsidiaries 2009|bermuda subsidiaries 2008|bermuda subsidiaries 2007|bermuda subsidiaries 2009|bermuda subsidiaries 2008|2007|
|statutory capital and surplus|$ 9299|$ 6205|$ 8579|$ 5801|$ 5368|$ 5321|
|statutory net income|$ 2472|$ 2196|$ 1535|$ 870|$ 818|$ 873|
as permitted by the restructuring discussed previously in note 7 , certain of the company 2019s u.s . subsidiaries discount certain a&e liabilities , which increased statutory capital and surplus by approximately $ 215 million , $ 211 million , and $ 140 million at december 31 , 2009 , 2008 , and 2007 , respectively . the company 2019s international subsidiaries prepare statutory financial statements based on local laws and regulations . some jurisdictions impose complex regulatory requirements on insurance companies while other jurisdictions impose fewer requirements . in some countries , the company must obtain licenses issued by governmental authorities to conduct local insurance business . these licenses may be subject to reserves and minimum capital and solvency tests . jurisdictions may impose fines , censure , and/or criminal sanctions for violation of regulatory requirements . 21 . information provided in connection with outstanding debt of subsidiaries the following tables present condensed consolidating financial information at december 31 , 2009 , and december 31 , 2008 , and for the years ended december 31 , 2009 , 2008 , and 2007 , for ace limited ( the parent guarantor ) and its 201csubsidiary issuer 201d , ace ina holdings , inc . the subsidiary issuer is an indirect 100 percent-owned subsidiary of the parent guarantor . investments in subsidiaries are accounted for by the parent guarantor under the equity method for purposes of the supplemental consolidating presentation . earnings of subsidiaries are reflected in the parent guarantor 2019s investment accounts and earnings . the parent guarantor fully and unconditionally guarantees certain of the debt of the subsidiary issuer. .
Question: what was the percentage increase in the statutory capital and surplus due to discount of certain a&e liabilities from 2008 to 2009 | 0.01896 | ### Transformed FinQA Question Generation Instructions
#### Step 1: Analyze and Understand the Original FinQA Question
- Objective: Use the given FinQA question to generate a new, logically similar but numerically different question.
- Guidelines:
- Identify the financial concepts and quantitative reasoning in the original question.
- Determine the key variables (e.g., revenue, profit, growth rate, interest) and their relationships.
- Maintain the original question’s structure and complexity.
#### Step 2: Transform and Adapt
- Objective: Create a new FinQA-style question while modifying numerical values and conditions.
- Guidelines:
- Change financial figures, constraints, or business conditions to create a unique question.
- Ensure the transformation maintains financial realism (e.g., realistic market trends, interest rates).
- Retain the original reasoning and computational steps while introducing fresh data points.
#### Step 3: Generate the New FinQA Question
- Objective: Output an original, transformed FinQA question without providing an answer or solution.
- Guidelines:
- Ensure the new question aligns with FinQA’s format and complexity.
- Maintain clarity and well-defined financial relationships.
### Response Rule
- **Generate only the "Transformed FinQA Question" for the given example without including any answer, explanation, or solution.**
### Output Format
#### Transformed FinQA Question: [Write your transformed FinQA question here.]
----
#### Task
#### Original FinQA Question: Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: n o t e s t o t h e c o n s o l i d a t e d f i n a n c i a l s t a t e m e n t s ( continued ) ace limited and subsidiaries 20 . statutory financial information the company 2019s insurance and reinsurance subsidiaries are subject to insurance laws and regulations in the jurisdictions in which they operate . these regulations include restrictions that limit the amount of dividends or other distributions , such as loans or cash advances , available to shareholders without prior approval of the insurance regulatory authorities . there are no statutory restrictions on the payment of dividends from retained earnings by any of the bermuda subsidiaries as the minimum statutory capital and surplus requirements are satisfied by the share capital and additional paid-in capital of each of the bermuda subsidiaries . the company 2019s u.s . subsidiaries file financial statements prepared in accordance with statutory accounting practices prescribed or permitted by insurance regulators . statutory accounting differs from gaap in the reporting of certain reinsurance contracts , investments , subsidiaries , acquis- ition expenses , fixed assets , deferred income taxes , and certain other items . the statutory capital and surplus of the u.s . subsidiaries met regulatory requirements for 2009 , 2008 , and 2007 . the amount of dividends available to be paid in 2010 , without prior approval from the state insurance departments , totals $ 733 million . the combined statutory capital and surplus and statutory net income of the bermuda and u.s . subsidiaries as at and for the years ended december 31 , 2009 , 2008 , and 2007 , are as follows: .
|( in millions of u.s . dollars )|bermuda subsidiaries 2009|bermuda subsidiaries 2008|bermuda subsidiaries 2007|bermuda subsidiaries 2009|bermuda subsidiaries 2008|2007|
|statutory capital and surplus|$ 9299|$ 6205|$ 8579|$ 5801|$ 5368|$ 5321|
|statutory net income|$ 2472|$ 2196|$ 1535|$ 870|$ 818|$ 873|
as permitted by the restructuring discussed previously in note 7 , certain of the company 2019s u.s . subsidiaries discount certain a&e liabilities , which increased statutory capital and surplus by approximately $ 215 million , $ 211 million , and $ 140 million at december 31 , 2009 , 2008 , and 2007 , respectively . the company 2019s international subsidiaries prepare statutory financial statements based on local laws and regulations . some jurisdictions impose complex regulatory requirements on insurance companies while other jurisdictions impose fewer requirements . in some countries , the company must obtain licenses issued by governmental authorities to conduct local insurance business . these licenses may be subject to reserves and minimum capital and solvency tests . jurisdictions may impose fines , censure , and/or criminal sanctions for violation of regulatory requirements . 21 . information provided in connection with outstanding debt of subsidiaries the following tables present condensed consolidating financial information at december 31 , 2009 , and december 31 , 2008 , and for the years ended december 31 , 2009 , 2008 , and 2007 , for ace limited ( the parent guarantor ) and its 201csubsidiary issuer 201d , ace ina holdings , inc . the subsidiary issuer is an indirect 100 percent-owned subsidiary of the parent guarantor . investments in subsidiaries are accounted for by the parent guarantor under the equity method for purposes of the supplemental consolidating presentation . earnings of subsidiaries are reflected in the parent guarantor 2019s investment accounts and earnings . the parent guarantor fully and unconditionally guarantees certain of the debt of the subsidiary issuer. .
Question: what was the percentage increase in the statutory capital and surplus due to discount of certain a&e liabilities from 2008 to 2009 |
Subsets and Splits