section_id
stringlengths 5
12
| passage
stringlengths 103
9.68k
| question
stringlengths 4
388
| query_id
stringlengths 36
36
| answer
dict | validated_answers
sequence |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
history_2138 | As of the 2010 United States Census, there were 88,737 people, 30,873 households, and 23,732 families residing in the county. The population density was . There were 33,780 housing units at an average density of . The racial makeup of the county was 81.4% white, 13.4% black or African American, 1.4% Asian, 0.4% American Indian, 0.7% from other races, and 2.7% from two or more races. Those of Hispanic or Latino origin made up 2.7% of the population. In terms of ancestry, 19.6% were Germans, 17.6% were Irish people, 13.9% were English people, 8.4% were Italians, and 7.4% were Americans. | How many percent of people were not white? | fe2a01b8-54f9-4c34-b860-2578b35d2de4 | {
"number": "18.6",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [],
"date": [],
"spans": [],
"worker_id": [],
"hit_id": []
} |
history_2138 | As of the 2010 United States Census, there were 88,737 people, 30,873 households, and 23,732 families residing in the county. The population density was . There were 33,780 housing units at an average density of . The racial makeup of the county was 81.4% white, 13.4% black or African American, 1.4% Asian, 0.4% American Indian, 0.7% from other races, and 2.7% from two or more races. Those of Hispanic or Latino origin made up 2.7% of the population. In terms of ancestry, 19.6% were Germans, 17.6% were Irish people, 13.9% were English people, 8.4% were Italians, and 7.4% were Americans. | How many percent of people were not African American? | cf7ec31e-cba8-4736-8801-f8f54fa50f85 | {
"number": "86.6",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [],
"date": [],
"spans": [],
"worker_id": [],
"hit_id": []
} |
history_2138 | As of the 2010 United States Census, there were 88,737 people, 30,873 households, and 23,732 families residing in the county. The population density was . There were 33,780 housing units at an average density of . The racial makeup of the county was 81.4% white, 13.4% black or African American, 1.4% Asian, 0.4% American Indian, 0.7% from other races, and 2.7% from two or more races. Those of Hispanic or Latino origin made up 2.7% of the population. In terms of ancestry, 19.6% were Germans, 17.6% were Irish people, 13.9% were English people, 8.4% were Italians, and 7.4% were Americans. | How many percent of people were not Asian? | 9b56a69a-66a6-4004-b56e-7560b1967c23 | {
"number": "98.6",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [],
"date": [],
"spans": [],
"worker_id": [],
"hit_id": []
} |
history_2138 | As of the 2010 United States Census, there were 88,737 people, 30,873 households, and 23,732 families residing in the county. The population density was . There were 33,780 housing units at an average density of . The racial makeup of the county was 81.4% white, 13.4% black or African American, 1.4% Asian, 0.4% American Indian, 0.7% from other races, and 2.7% from two or more races. Those of Hispanic or Latino origin made up 2.7% of the population. In terms of ancestry, 19.6% were Germans, 17.6% were Irish people, 13.9% were English people, 8.4% were Italians, and 7.4% were Americans. | How many percent of people were not American indian? | 7cd494b5-dab3-4334-99ab-42fe95b67166 | {
"number": "99.6",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [],
"date": [],
"spans": [],
"worker_id": [],
"hit_id": []
} |
history_2138 | As of the 2010 United States Census, there were 88,737 people, 30,873 households, and 23,732 families residing in the county. The population density was . There were 33,780 housing units at an average density of . The racial makeup of the county was 81.4% white, 13.4% black or African American, 1.4% Asian, 0.4% American Indian, 0.7% from other races, and 2.7% from two or more races. Those of Hispanic or Latino origin made up 2.7% of the population. In terms of ancestry, 19.6% were Germans, 17.6% were Irish people, 13.9% were English people, 8.4% were Italians, and 7.4% were Americans. | How many percent of people were not other races? | 9ac1c13d-0dd6-4a24-a1ac-fd5cd1bf770f | {
"number": "99.3",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [],
"date": [],
"spans": [],
"worker_id": [],
"hit_id": []
} |
history_2138 | As of the 2010 United States Census, there were 88,737 people, 30,873 households, and 23,732 families residing in the county. The population density was . There were 33,780 housing units at an average density of . The racial makeup of the county was 81.4% white, 13.4% black or African American, 1.4% Asian, 0.4% American Indian, 0.7% from other races, and 2.7% from two or more races. Those of Hispanic or Latino origin made up 2.7% of the population. In terms of ancestry, 19.6% were Germans, 17.6% were Irish people, 13.9% were English people, 8.4% were Italians, and 7.4% were Americans. | How many percent of people were not from 2 or more races? | 30320448-793f-444b-af23-c69f889c2205 | {
"number": "97.3",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [],
"date": [],
"spans": [],
"worker_id": [],
"hit_id": []
} |
history_2138 | As of the 2010 United States Census, there were 88,737 people, 30,873 households, and 23,732 families residing in the county. The population density was . There were 33,780 housing units at an average density of . The racial makeup of the county was 81.4% white, 13.4% black or African American, 1.4% Asian, 0.4% American Indian, 0.7% from other races, and 2.7% from two or more races. Those of Hispanic or Latino origin made up 2.7% of the population. In terms of ancestry, 19.6% were Germans, 17.6% were Irish people, 13.9% were English people, 8.4% were Italians, and 7.4% were Americans. | How many percent of people were not Hispanic? | 94d0aa6a-ec34-474b-9aa5-1ace02268b55 | {
"number": "97.3",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [],
"date": [],
"spans": [],
"worker_id": [],
"hit_id": []
} |
history_2138 | As of the 2010 United States Census, there were 88,737 people, 30,873 households, and 23,732 families residing in the county. The population density was . There were 33,780 housing units at an average density of . The racial makeup of the county was 81.4% white, 13.4% black or African American, 1.4% Asian, 0.4% American Indian, 0.7% from other races, and 2.7% from two or more races. Those of Hispanic or Latino origin made up 2.7% of the population. In terms of ancestry, 19.6% were Germans, 17.6% were Irish people, 13.9% were English people, 8.4% were Italians, and 7.4% were Americans. | How many percent were not German? | d72ce11f-fabe-42a5-82ed-d883456a327e | {
"number": "80.4",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [],
"date": [],
"spans": [],
"worker_id": [],
"hit_id": []
} |
history_2138 | As of the 2010 United States Census, there were 88,737 people, 30,873 households, and 23,732 families residing in the county. The population density was . There were 33,780 housing units at an average density of . The racial makeup of the county was 81.4% white, 13.4% black or African American, 1.4% Asian, 0.4% American Indian, 0.7% from other races, and 2.7% from two or more races. Those of Hispanic or Latino origin made up 2.7% of the population. In terms of ancestry, 19.6% were Germans, 17.6% were Irish people, 13.9% were English people, 8.4% were Italians, and 7.4% were Americans. | How many percent were not Irish? | 5007aaee-9be4-45af-bcc5-468aca38a8ef | {
"number": "82.4",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [],
"date": [],
"spans": [],
"worker_id": [],
"hit_id": []
} |
history_2138 | As of the 2010 United States Census, there were 88,737 people, 30,873 households, and 23,732 families residing in the county. The population density was . There were 33,780 housing units at an average density of . The racial makeup of the county was 81.4% white, 13.4% black or African American, 1.4% Asian, 0.4% American Indian, 0.7% from other races, and 2.7% from two or more races. Those of Hispanic or Latino origin made up 2.7% of the population. In terms of ancestry, 19.6% were Germans, 17.6% were Irish people, 13.9% were English people, 8.4% were Italians, and 7.4% were Americans. | How many percent were not english? | 90156109-657c-4315-93ba-9ad826641296 | {
"number": "86.1",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [],
"date": [],
"spans": [],
"worker_id": [],
"hit_id": []
} |
history_2138 | As of the 2010 United States Census, there were 88,737 people, 30,873 households, and 23,732 families residing in the county. The population density was . There were 33,780 housing units at an average density of . The racial makeup of the county was 81.4% white, 13.4% black or African American, 1.4% Asian, 0.4% American Indian, 0.7% from other races, and 2.7% from two or more races. Those of Hispanic or Latino origin made up 2.7% of the population. In terms of ancestry, 19.6% were Germans, 17.6% were Irish people, 13.9% were English people, 8.4% were Italians, and 7.4% were Americans. | How many percent were not Italian? | c23f3bbd-a117-42de-bdda-b468a0b57125 | {
"number": "91.6",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [],
"date": [],
"spans": [],
"worker_id": [],
"hit_id": []
} |
history_2138 | As of the 2010 United States Census, there were 88,737 people, 30,873 households, and 23,732 families residing in the county. The population density was . There were 33,780 housing units at an average density of . The racial makeup of the county was 81.4% white, 13.4% black or African American, 1.4% Asian, 0.4% American Indian, 0.7% from other races, and 2.7% from two or more races. Those of Hispanic or Latino origin made up 2.7% of the population. In terms of ancestry, 19.6% were Germans, 17.6% were Irish people, 13.9% were English people, 8.4% were Italians, and 7.4% were Americans. | How many percent were not American? | 1612edf7-eb2e-46fb-b0db-d3c3c3bdf472 | {
"number": "99.6",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [],
"date": [],
"spans": [],
"worker_id": [],
"hit_id": []
} |
history_2138 | As of the 2010 United States Census, there were 88,737 people, 30,873 households, and 23,732 families residing in the county. The population density was . There were 33,780 housing units at an average density of . The racial makeup of the county was 81.4% white, 13.4% black or African American, 1.4% Asian, 0.4% American Indian, 0.7% from other races, and 2.7% from two or more races. Those of Hispanic or Latino origin made up 2.7% of the population. In terms of ancestry, 19.6% were Germans, 17.6% were Irish people, 13.9% were English people, 8.4% were Italians, and 7.4% were Americans. | What was the third largest racial group? | c454f4e1-00d1-4fe1-97a7-3b1cb91b2969 | {
"number": "",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [
"Asian"
],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [],
"date": [],
"spans": [],
"worker_id": [],
"hit_id": []
} |
history_2138 | As of the 2010 United States Census, there were 88,737 people, 30,873 households, and 23,732 families residing in the county. The population density was . There were 33,780 housing units at an average density of . The racial makeup of the county was 81.4% white, 13.4% black or African American, 1.4% Asian, 0.4% American Indian, 0.7% from other races, and 2.7% from two or more races. Those of Hispanic or Latino origin made up 2.7% of the population. In terms of ancestry, 19.6% were Germans, 17.6% were Irish people, 13.9% were English people, 8.4% were Italians, and 7.4% were Americans. | How many percent of people were either black, Asian or American Indian? | a8b66d5a-ab21-4b79-a001-a3c08c83340a | {
"number": "15.2",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [],
"date": [],
"spans": [],
"worker_id": [],
"hit_id": []
} |
history_2138 | As of the 2010 United States Census, there were 88,737 people, 30,873 households, and 23,732 families residing in the county. The population density was . There were 33,780 housing units at an average density of . The racial makeup of the county was 81.4% white, 13.4% black or African American, 1.4% Asian, 0.4% American Indian, 0.7% from other races, and 2.7% from two or more races. Those of Hispanic or Latino origin made up 2.7% of the population. In terms of ancestry, 19.6% were Germans, 17.6% were Irish people, 13.9% were English people, 8.4% were Italians, and 7.4% were Americans. | How many more percent of the population was white versus the second highest racial group? | 039258b7-6b13-443b-968d-f2402cd60a82 | {
"number": "68",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [],
"date": [],
"spans": [],
"worker_id": [],
"hit_id": []
} |
history_2138 | As of the 2010 United States Census, there were 88,737 people, 30,873 households, and 23,732 families residing in the county. The population density was . There were 33,780 housing units at an average density of . The racial makeup of the county was 81.4% white, 13.4% black or African American, 1.4% Asian, 0.4% American Indian, 0.7% from other races, and 2.7% from two or more races. Those of Hispanic or Latino origin made up 2.7% of the population. In terms of ancestry, 19.6% were Germans, 17.6% were Irish people, 13.9% were English people, 8.4% were Italians, and 7.4% were Americans. | Which ancestry groups were between 5% and 10% of the population? | 00339159-dd61-4969-a6c0-7daee3ca6d37 | {
"number": "",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [
"Italians",
"Americans"
],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [],
"date": [],
"spans": [],
"worker_id": [],
"hit_id": []
} |
history_2180 | According to police statistics, the most common complaint received by the Metropolitan Police Bureau in 2010 was housebreaking, with 12,347 cases. This was followed by 5,504 cases of motorcycle thefts, 3,694 cases of assault and 2,836 cases of embezzlement. Serious offences included 183 murders, 81 gang robberies, 265 robberies, 1 kidnapping and 9 arson cases. Offences against the state were by far more common, and included 54,068 drug-related cases, 17,239 cases involving prostitution and 8,634 related to gambling. The Thailand Crime Victim Survey conducted by the Office of Justice Affairs of the Ministry of Justice found that 2.7 percent of surveyed households reported a member being victim of a crime in 2007. Of these, 96.1 percent were crimes against property, 2.6 percent were crimes against life and body, and 1.4 percent were information-related crimes. | Were there more motorcycle thefts or assault cases? | 0f5862bb-4160-4bc3-8730-a6ca35a831d9 | {
"number": "",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [
"motorcycle thefts"
],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [
""
],
"date": [
{
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
}
],
"spans": [
[]
],
"worker_id": [
""
],
"hit_id": [
""
]
} |
history_2180 | According to police statistics, the most common complaint received by the Metropolitan Police Bureau in 2010 was housebreaking, with 12,347 cases. This was followed by 5,504 cases of motorcycle thefts, 3,694 cases of assault and 2,836 cases of embezzlement. Serious offences included 183 murders, 81 gang robberies, 265 robberies, 1 kidnapping and 9 arson cases. Offences against the state were by far more common, and included 54,068 drug-related cases, 17,239 cases involving prostitution and 8,634 related to gambling. The Thailand Crime Victim Survey conducted by the Office of Justice Affairs of the Ministry of Justice found that 2.7 percent of surveyed households reported a member being victim of a crime in 2007. Of these, 96.1 percent were crimes against property, 2.6 percent were crimes against life and body, and 1.4 percent were information-related crimes. | How many more housebreaking cases were there compared to motorcycle thefts? | f43fa764-0b64-4975-a62c-d8c152c362c5 | {
"number": "6843",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [
""
],
"date": [
{
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
}
],
"spans": [
[]
],
"worker_id": [
""
],
"hit_id": [
""
]
} |
history_2180 | According to police statistics, the most common complaint received by the Metropolitan Police Bureau in 2010 was housebreaking, with 12,347 cases. This was followed by 5,504 cases of motorcycle thefts, 3,694 cases of assault and 2,836 cases of embezzlement. Serious offences included 183 murders, 81 gang robberies, 265 robberies, 1 kidnapping and 9 arson cases. Offences against the state were by far more common, and included 54,068 drug-related cases, 17,239 cases involving prostitution and 8,634 related to gambling. The Thailand Crime Victim Survey conducted by the Office of Justice Affairs of the Ministry of Justice found that 2.7 percent of surveyed households reported a member being victim of a crime in 2007. Of these, 96.1 percent were crimes against property, 2.6 percent were crimes against life and body, and 1.4 percent were information-related crimes. | How many total serious offences were there? | 17fc5c9b-b5c8-4b12-9dbf-8f2873700cbf | {
"number": "539",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [
""
],
"date": [
{
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
}
],
"spans": [
[]
],
"worker_id": [
""
],
"hit_id": [
""
]
} |
history_2180 | According to police statistics, the most common complaint received by the Metropolitan Police Bureau in 2010 was housebreaking, with 12,347 cases. This was followed by 5,504 cases of motorcycle thefts, 3,694 cases of assault and 2,836 cases of embezzlement. Serious offences included 183 murders, 81 gang robberies, 265 robberies, 1 kidnapping and 9 arson cases. Offences against the state were by far more common, and included 54,068 drug-related cases, 17,239 cases involving prostitution and 8,634 related to gambling. The Thailand Crime Victim Survey conducted by the Office of Justice Affairs of the Ministry of Justice found that 2.7 percent of surveyed households reported a member being victim of a crime in 2007. Of these, 96.1 percent were crimes against property, 2.6 percent were crimes against life and body, and 1.4 percent were information-related crimes. | Were there fewer drug related cases or cases involving prostitution? | 64f002fe-1e32-4314-8530-7f07f4439f94 | {
"number": "",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [
"cases involving prostitution"
],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [
""
],
"date": [
{
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
}
],
"spans": [
[]
],
"worker_id": [
""
],
"hit_id": [
""
]
} |
history_2180 | According to police statistics, the most common complaint received by the Metropolitan Police Bureau in 2010 was housebreaking, with 12,347 cases. This was followed by 5,504 cases of motorcycle thefts, 3,694 cases of assault and 2,836 cases of embezzlement. Serious offences included 183 murders, 81 gang robberies, 265 robberies, 1 kidnapping and 9 arson cases. Offences against the state were by far more common, and included 54,068 drug-related cases, 17,239 cases involving prostitution and 8,634 related to gambling. The Thailand Crime Victim Survey conducted by the Office of Justice Affairs of the Ministry of Justice found that 2.7 percent of surveyed households reported a member being victim of a crime in 2007. Of these, 96.1 percent were crimes against property, 2.6 percent were crimes against life and body, and 1.4 percent were information-related crimes. | How many less gambling cases were there than prostitution cases? | a2227b5f-a4c3-44bb-9c47-cb5a59442af8 | {
"number": "8605",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [
""
],
"date": [
{
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
}
],
"spans": [
[]
],
"worker_id": [
""
],
"hit_id": [
""
]
} |
history_2180 | According to police statistics, the most common complaint received by the Metropolitan Police Bureau in 2010 was housebreaking, with 12,347 cases. This was followed by 5,504 cases of motorcycle thefts, 3,694 cases of assault and 2,836 cases of embezzlement. Serious offences included 183 murders, 81 gang robberies, 265 robberies, 1 kidnapping and 9 arson cases. Offences against the state were by far more common, and included 54,068 drug-related cases, 17,239 cases involving prostitution and 8,634 related to gambling. The Thailand Crime Victim Survey conducted by the Office of Justice Affairs of the Ministry of Justice found that 2.7 percent of surveyed households reported a member being victim of a crime in 2007. Of these, 96.1 percent were crimes against property, 2.6 percent were crimes against life and body, and 1.4 percent were information-related crimes. | How many percent of households did not report being a crime victim in 2007? | 2c6170c1-f250-4295-86ce-439424ab3124 | {
"number": "97.3",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [
""
],
"date": [
{
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
}
],
"spans": [
[]
],
"worker_id": [
""
],
"hit_id": [
""
]
} |
history_2180 | According to police statistics, the most common complaint received by the Metropolitan Police Bureau in 2010 was housebreaking, with 12,347 cases. This was followed by 5,504 cases of motorcycle thefts, 3,694 cases of assault and 2,836 cases of embezzlement. Serious offences included 183 murders, 81 gang robberies, 265 robberies, 1 kidnapping and 9 arson cases. Offences against the state were by far more common, and included 54,068 drug-related cases, 17,239 cases involving prostitution and 8,634 related to gambling. The Thailand Crime Victim Survey conducted by the Office of Justice Affairs of the Ministry of Justice found that 2.7 percent of surveyed households reported a member being victim of a crime in 2007. Of these, 96.1 percent were crimes against property, 2.6 percent were crimes against life and body, and 1.4 percent were information-related crimes. | Which were there more cases of, housebreaking, motorcycle thefts assault or embezzlement? | 4996c1ec-94f7-4dd2-ab41-c612a00aa059 | {
"number": "",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [
"housebreaking"
],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [
""
],
"date": [
{
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
}
],
"spans": [
[]
],
"worker_id": [
""
],
"hit_id": [
""
]
} |
history_2180 | According to police statistics, the most common complaint received by the Metropolitan Police Bureau in 2010 was housebreaking, with 12,347 cases. This was followed by 5,504 cases of motorcycle thefts, 3,694 cases of assault and 2,836 cases of embezzlement. Serious offences included 183 murders, 81 gang robberies, 265 robberies, 1 kidnapping and 9 arson cases. Offences against the state were by far more common, and included 54,068 drug-related cases, 17,239 cases involving prostitution and 8,634 related to gambling. The Thailand Crime Victim Survey conducted by the Office of Justice Affairs of the Ministry of Justice found that 2.7 percent of surveyed households reported a member being victim of a crime in 2007. Of these, 96.1 percent were crimes against property, 2.6 percent were crimes against life and body, and 1.4 percent were information-related crimes. | Which were there more of, assault or embezzlement? | 92404d5b-f07a-464e-83e2-322342f5f35d | {
"number": "",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [
"assault"
],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [
""
],
"date": [
{
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
}
],
"spans": [
[]
],
"worker_id": [
""
],
"hit_id": [
""
]
} |
history_2180 | According to police statistics, the most common complaint received by the Metropolitan Police Bureau in 2010 was housebreaking, with 12,347 cases. This was followed by 5,504 cases of motorcycle thefts, 3,694 cases of assault and 2,836 cases of embezzlement. Serious offences included 183 murders, 81 gang robberies, 265 robberies, 1 kidnapping and 9 arson cases. Offences against the state were by far more common, and included 54,068 drug-related cases, 17,239 cases involving prostitution and 8,634 related to gambling. The Thailand Crime Victim Survey conducted by the Office of Justice Affairs of the Ministry of Justice found that 2.7 percent of surveyed households reported a member being victim of a crime in 2007. Of these, 96.1 percent were crimes against property, 2.6 percent were crimes against life and body, and 1.4 percent were information-related crimes. | How many types of crimes had over 5000 complaints? | 838f0a14-29d7-4fcd-8135-034eefef2f85 | {
"number": "2",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [
""
],
"date": [
{
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
}
],
"spans": [
[]
],
"worker_id": [
""
],
"hit_id": [
""
]
} |
history_2180 | According to police statistics, the most common complaint received by the Metropolitan Police Bureau in 2010 was housebreaking, with 12,347 cases. This was followed by 5,504 cases of motorcycle thefts, 3,694 cases of assault and 2,836 cases of embezzlement. Serious offences included 183 murders, 81 gang robberies, 265 robberies, 1 kidnapping and 9 arson cases. Offences against the state were by far more common, and included 54,068 drug-related cases, 17,239 cases involving prostitution and 8,634 related to gambling. The Thailand Crime Victim Survey conducted by the Office of Justice Affairs of the Ministry of Justice found that 2.7 percent of surveyed households reported a member being victim of a crime in 2007. Of these, 96.1 percent were crimes against property, 2.6 percent were crimes against life and body, and 1.4 percent were information-related crimes. | How many more cases of motorcycle thefts were there than cases of embezzlement? | 01a3f5a8-103e-44bc-bbe7-3672c727ef93 | {
"number": "2668",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [
""
],
"date": [
{
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
}
],
"spans": [
[]
],
"worker_id": [
""
],
"hit_id": [
""
]
} |
history_2180 | According to police statistics, the most common complaint received by the Metropolitan Police Bureau in 2010 was housebreaking, with 12,347 cases. This was followed by 5,504 cases of motorcycle thefts, 3,694 cases of assault and 2,836 cases of embezzlement. Serious offences included 183 murders, 81 gang robberies, 265 robberies, 1 kidnapping and 9 arson cases. Offences against the state were by far more common, and included 54,068 drug-related cases, 17,239 cases involving prostitution and 8,634 related to gambling. The Thailand Crime Victim Survey conducted by the Office of Justice Affairs of the Ministry of Justice found that 2.7 percent of surveyed households reported a member being victim of a crime in 2007. Of these, 96.1 percent were crimes against property, 2.6 percent were crimes against life and body, and 1.4 percent were information-related crimes. | How many more arson cases than kidnappings occurred? | 4da2c5a2-1d54-4aa8-9bac-495f52addef1 | {
"number": "8",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [
""
],
"date": [
{
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
}
],
"spans": [
[]
],
"worker_id": [
""
],
"hit_id": [
""
]
} |
history_2180 | According to police statistics, the most common complaint received by the Metropolitan Police Bureau in 2010 was housebreaking, with 12,347 cases. This was followed by 5,504 cases of motorcycle thefts, 3,694 cases of assault and 2,836 cases of embezzlement. Serious offences included 183 murders, 81 gang robberies, 265 robberies, 1 kidnapping and 9 arson cases. Offences against the state were by far more common, and included 54,068 drug-related cases, 17,239 cases involving prostitution and 8,634 related to gambling. The Thailand Crime Victim Survey conducted by the Office of Justice Affairs of the Ministry of Justice found that 2.7 percent of surveyed households reported a member being victim of a crime in 2007. Of these, 96.1 percent were crimes against property, 2.6 percent were crimes against life and body, and 1.4 percent were information-related crimes. | Which offences against the state was the highest, drug-related cases, cases involving prostitution or gambling? | 608cef2f-eb02-434c-a6d1-71e99d1829f6 | {
"number": "",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [
"drug-related cases"
],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [
""
],
"date": [
{
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
}
],
"spans": [
[]
],
"worker_id": [
""
],
"hit_id": [
""
]
} |
history_2180 | According to police statistics, the most common complaint received by the Metropolitan Police Bureau in 2010 was housebreaking, with 12,347 cases. This was followed by 5,504 cases of motorcycle thefts, 3,694 cases of assault and 2,836 cases of embezzlement. Serious offences included 183 murders, 81 gang robberies, 265 robberies, 1 kidnapping and 9 arson cases. Offences against the state were by far more common, and included 54,068 drug-related cases, 17,239 cases involving prostitution and 8,634 related to gambling. The Thailand Crime Victim Survey conducted by the Office of Justice Affairs of the Ministry of Justice found that 2.7 percent of surveyed households reported a member being victim of a crime in 2007. Of these, 96.1 percent were crimes against property, 2.6 percent were crimes against life and body, and 1.4 percent were information-related crimes. | Which offences against the state had more than 17000 cases? | 21252f1a-ded6-4fff-90ab-fbd16fa50840 | {
"number": "",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [
"drug-related",
"prostitution"
],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [
""
],
"date": [
{
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
}
],
"spans": [
[]
],
"worker_id": [
""
],
"hit_id": [
""
]
} |
history_2180 | According to police statistics, the most common complaint received by the Metropolitan Police Bureau in 2010 was housebreaking, with 12,347 cases. This was followed by 5,504 cases of motorcycle thefts, 3,694 cases of assault and 2,836 cases of embezzlement. Serious offences included 183 murders, 81 gang robberies, 265 robberies, 1 kidnapping and 9 arson cases. Offences against the state were by far more common, and included 54,068 drug-related cases, 17,239 cases involving prostitution and 8,634 related to gambling. The Thailand Crime Victim Survey conducted by the Office of Justice Affairs of the Ministry of Justice found that 2.7 percent of surveyed households reported a member being victim of a crime in 2007. Of these, 96.1 percent were crimes against property, 2.6 percent were crimes against life and body, and 1.4 percent were information-related crimes. | How many serious offences only had one case reported? | fa0cae09-a1f9-4297-a7ca-ac36e31f4f70 | {
"number": "1",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [
""
],
"date": [
{
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
}
],
"spans": [
[]
],
"worker_id": [
""
],
"hit_id": [
""
]
} |
history_2180 | According to police statistics, the most common complaint received by the Metropolitan Police Bureau in 2010 was housebreaking, with 12,347 cases. This was followed by 5,504 cases of motorcycle thefts, 3,694 cases of assault and 2,836 cases of embezzlement. Serious offences included 183 murders, 81 gang robberies, 265 robberies, 1 kidnapping and 9 arson cases. Offences against the state were by far more common, and included 54,068 drug-related cases, 17,239 cases involving prostitution and 8,634 related to gambling. The Thailand Crime Victim Survey conducted by the Office of Justice Affairs of the Ministry of Justice found that 2.7 percent of surveyed households reported a member being victim of a crime in 2007. Of these, 96.1 percent were crimes against property, 2.6 percent were crimes against life and body, and 1.4 percent were information-related crimes. | How many serious offences were there total? | 40560f6b-19b2-4f3c-aa97-b7c2866559f5 | {
"number": "539",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [
""
],
"date": [
{
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
}
],
"spans": [
[]
],
"worker_id": [
""
],
"hit_id": [
""
]
} |
history_2180 | According to police statistics, the most common complaint received by the Metropolitan Police Bureau in 2010 was housebreaking, with 12,347 cases. This was followed by 5,504 cases of motorcycle thefts, 3,694 cases of assault and 2,836 cases of embezzlement. Serious offences included 183 murders, 81 gang robberies, 265 robberies, 1 kidnapping and 9 arson cases. Offences against the state were by far more common, and included 54,068 drug-related cases, 17,239 cases involving prostitution and 8,634 related to gambling. The Thailand Crime Victim Survey conducted by the Office of Justice Affairs of the Ministry of Justice found that 2.7 percent of surveyed households reported a member being victim of a crime in 2007. Of these, 96.1 percent were crimes against property, 2.6 percent were crimes against life and body, and 1.4 percent were information-related crimes. | Which 3 types of complaints were the most common? | 2047890b-cddf-47ab-8ac0-c6ca72ede989 | {
"number": "",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [
"housebreaking",
"motorcycle thefts",
"assault"
],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [],
"date": [],
"spans": [],
"worker_id": [],
"hit_id": []
} |
history_2180 | According to police statistics, the most common complaint received by the Metropolitan Police Bureau in 2010 was housebreaking, with 12,347 cases. This was followed by 5,504 cases of motorcycle thefts, 3,694 cases of assault and 2,836 cases of embezzlement. Serious offences included 183 murders, 81 gang robberies, 265 robberies, 1 kidnapping and 9 arson cases. Offences against the state were by far more common, and included 54,068 drug-related cases, 17,239 cases involving prostitution and 8,634 related to gambling. The Thailand Crime Victim Survey conducted by the Office of Justice Affairs of the Ministry of Justice found that 2.7 percent of surveyed households reported a member being victim of a crime in 2007. Of these, 96.1 percent were crimes against property, 2.6 percent were crimes against life and body, and 1.4 percent were information-related crimes. | What was the most common serious offense? | 3370fd43-4186-4f33-a5ff-29397f3340e5 | {
"number": "",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [
"robberies"
],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [],
"date": [],
"spans": [],
"worker_id": [],
"hit_id": []
} |
history_2180 | According to police statistics, the most common complaint received by the Metropolitan Police Bureau in 2010 was housebreaking, with 12,347 cases. This was followed by 5,504 cases of motorcycle thefts, 3,694 cases of assault and 2,836 cases of embezzlement. Serious offences included 183 murders, 81 gang robberies, 265 robberies, 1 kidnapping and 9 arson cases. Offences against the state were by far more common, and included 54,068 drug-related cases, 17,239 cases involving prostitution and 8,634 related to gambling. The Thailand Crime Victim Survey conducted by the Office of Justice Affairs of the Ministry of Justice found that 2.7 percent of surveyed households reported a member being victim of a crime in 2007. Of these, 96.1 percent were crimes against property, 2.6 percent were crimes against life and body, and 1.4 percent were information-related crimes. | What was the least common offense against the state? | 513c01af-28b7-4214-a693-59be02747c23 | {
"number": "",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [
"gambling"
],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [],
"date": [],
"spans": [],
"worker_id": [],
"hit_id": []
} |
history_2180 | According to police statistics, the most common complaint received by the Metropolitan Police Bureau in 2010 was housebreaking, with 12,347 cases. This was followed by 5,504 cases of motorcycle thefts, 3,694 cases of assault and 2,836 cases of embezzlement. Serious offences included 183 murders, 81 gang robberies, 265 robberies, 1 kidnapping and 9 arson cases. Offences against the state were by far more common, and included 54,068 drug-related cases, 17,239 cases involving prostitution and 8,634 related to gambling. The Thailand Crime Victim Survey conducted by the Office of Justice Affairs of the Ministry of Justice found that 2.7 percent of surveyed households reported a member being victim of a crime in 2007. Of these, 96.1 percent were crimes against property, 2.6 percent were crimes against life and body, and 1.4 percent were information-related crimes. | Which types of crimes accounted for less than 10% of all crimes? | bf14b3c0-e6e0-49fd-b9aa-b13e106dd2f8 | {
"number": "",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [
"crimes against life and body",
"information-related crimes"
],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [],
"date": [],
"spans": [],
"worker_id": [],
"hit_id": []
} |
history_2180 | According to police statistics, the most common complaint received by the Metropolitan Police Bureau in 2010 was housebreaking, with 12,347 cases. This was followed by 5,504 cases of motorcycle thefts, 3,694 cases of assault and 2,836 cases of embezzlement. Serious offences included 183 murders, 81 gang robberies, 265 robberies, 1 kidnapping and 9 arson cases. Offences against the state were by far more common, and included 54,068 drug-related cases, 17,239 cases involving prostitution and 8,634 related to gambling. The Thailand Crime Victim Survey conducted by the Office of Justice Affairs of the Ministry of Justice found that 2.7 percent of surveyed households reported a member being victim of a crime in 2007. Of these, 96.1 percent were crimes against property, 2.6 percent were crimes against life and body, and 1.4 percent were information-related crimes. | How many more drug-related cases were there than prostitution? | 9342a600-9285-43a5-8356-392c2359ab5e | {
"number": "36829",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [],
"date": [],
"spans": [],
"worker_id": [],
"hit_id": []
} |
history_2180 | According to police statistics, the most common complaint received by the Metropolitan Police Bureau in 2010 was housebreaking, with 12,347 cases. This was followed by 5,504 cases of motorcycle thefts, 3,694 cases of assault and 2,836 cases of embezzlement. Serious offences included 183 murders, 81 gang robberies, 265 robberies, 1 kidnapping and 9 arson cases. Offences against the state were by far more common, and included 54,068 drug-related cases, 17,239 cases involving prostitution and 8,634 related to gambling. The Thailand Crime Victim Survey conducted by the Office of Justice Affairs of the Ministry of Justice found that 2.7 percent of surveyed households reported a member being victim of a crime in 2007. Of these, 96.1 percent were crimes against property, 2.6 percent were crimes against life and body, and 1.4 percent were information-related crimes. | How many more cases of housebreaking were there compared to cases of motorcycle theft and assault combined? | 7e94b07b-0176-4ba7-9f9f-91e25e3f4922 | {
"number": "3149",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [],
"date": [],
"spans": [],
"worker_id": [],
"hit_id": []
} |
history_2180 | According to police statistics, the most common complaint received by the Metropolitan Police Bureau in 2010 was housebreaking, with 12,347 cases. This was followed by 5,504 cases of motorcycle thefts, 3,694 cases of assault and 2,836 cases of embezzlement. Serious offences included 183 murders, 81 gang robberies, 265 robberies, 1 kidnapping and 9 arson cases. Offences against the state were by far more common, and included 54,068 drug-related cases, 17,239 cases involving prostitution and 8,634 related to gambling. The Thailand Crime Victim Survey conducted by the Office of Justice Affairs of the Ministry of Justice found that 2.7 percent of surveyed households reported a member being victim of a crime in 2007. Of these, 96.1 percent were crimes against property, 2.6 percent were crimes against life and body, and 1.4 percent were information-related crimes. | How many more cases of housebreaking were there compared to cases of motorcycle theft and embezzlement combined? | b24b1f4a-6d5e-41fc-9540-20c2de4ac876 | {
"number": "4007",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [],
"date": [],
"spans": [],
"worker_id": [],
"hit_id": []
} |
history_2180 | According to police statistics, the most common complaint received by the Metropolitan Police Bureau in 2010 was housebreaking, with 12,347 cases. This was followed by 5,504 cases of motorcycle thefts, 3,694 cases of assault and 2,836 cases of embezzlement. Serious offences included 183 murders, 81 gang robberies, 265 robberies, 1 kidnapping and 9 arson cases. Offences against the state were by far more common, and included 54,068 drug-related cases, 17,239 cases involving prostitution and 8,634 related to gambling. The Thailand Crime Victim Survey conducted by the Office of Justice Affairs of the Ministry of Justice found that 2.7 percent of surveyed households reported a member being victim of a crime in 2007. Of these, 96.1 percent were crimes against property, 2.6 percent were crimes against life and body, and 1.4 percent were information-related crimes. | How many more cases of housebreaking were there compared to cases of assault and embezzlement combined? | be607c0f-b246-446b-b4bc-142b58409448 | {
"number": "5817",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [],
"date": [],
"spans": [],
"worker_id": [],
"hit_id": []
} |
history_2180 | According to police statistics, the most common complaint received by the Metropolitan Police Bureau in 2010 was housebreaking, with 12,347 cases. This was followed by 5,504 cases of motorcycle thefts, 3,694 cases of assault and 2,836 cases of embezzlement. Serious offences included 183 murders, 81 gang robberies, 265 robberies, 1 kidnapping and 9 arson cases. Offences against the state were by far more common, and included 54,068 drug-related cases, 17,239 cases involving prostitution and 8,634 related to gambling. The Thailand Crime Victim Survey conducted by the Office of Justice Affairs of the Ministry of Justice found that 2.7 percent of surveyed households reported a member being victim of a crime in 2007. Of these, 96.1 percent were crimes against property, 2.6 percent were crimes against life and body, and 1.4 percent were information-related crimes. | How many more cases of assault and embezzlement were there combined compared to cases of motorcycle thefts? | 47313fa2-31de-40c8-9b4a-3e9ba674b8f8 | {
"number": "1026",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [],
"date": [],
"spans": [],
"worker_id": [],
"hit_id": []
} |
history_2180 | According to police statistics, the most common complaint received by the Metropolitan Police Bureau in 2010 was housebreaking, with 12,347 cases. This was followed by 5,504 cases of motorcycle thefts, 3,694 cases of assault and 2,836 cases of embezzlement. Serious offences included 183 murders, 81 gang robberies, 265 robberies, 1 kidnapping and 9 arson cases. Offences against the state were by far more common, and included 54,068 drug-related cases, 17,239 cases involving prostitution and 8,634 related to gambling. The Thailand Crime Victim Survey conducted by the Office of Justice Affairs of the Ministry of Justice found that 2.7 percent of surveyed households reported a member being victim of a crime in 2007. Of these, 96.1 percent were crimes against property, 2.6 percent were crimes against life and body, and 1.4 percent were information-related crimes. | How many more non-gang robberies were there compared to kidnappings and arson cases combined? | 2dbad952-92ec-4611-96f2-ab5ce7e8e80b | {
"number": "255",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [],
"date": [],
"spans": [],
"worker_id": [],
"hit_id": []
} |
history_2180 | According to police statistics, the most common complaint received by the Metropolitan Police Bureau in 2010 was housebreaking, with 12,347 cases. This was followed by 5,504 cases of motorcycle thefts, 3,694 cases of assault and 2,836 cases of embezzlement. Serious offences included 183 murders, 81 gang robberies, 265 robberies, 1 kidnapping and 9 arson cases. Offences against the state were by far more common, and included 54,068 drug-related cases, 17,239 cases involving prostitution and 8,634 related to gambling. The Thailand Crime Victim Survey conducted by the Office of Justice Affairs of the Ministry of Justice found that 2.7 percent of surveyed households reported a member being victim of a crime in 2007. Of these, 96.1 percent were crimes against property, 2.6 percent were crimes against life and body, and 1.4 percent were information-related crimes. | How many more murders were there compared to kidnappings and arson cases combined? | 22d62602-c847-4b60-9a8b-daee02ec1dc4 | {
"number": "173",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [],
"date": [],
"spans": [],
"worker_id": [],
"hit_id": []
} |
history_2180 | According to police statistics, the most common complaint received by the Metropolitan Police Bureau in 2010 was housebreaking, with 12,347 cases. This was followed by 5,504 cases of motorcycle thefts, 3,694 cases of assault and 2,836 cases of embezzlement. Serious offences included 183 murders, 81 gang robberies, 265 robberies, 1 kidnapping and 9 arson cases. Offences against the state were by far more common, and included 54,068 drug-related cases, 17,239 cases involving prostitution and 8,634 related to gambling. The Thailand Crime Victim Survey conducted by the Office of Justice Affairs of the Ministry of Justice found that 2.7 percent of surveyed households reported a member being victim of a crime in 2007. Of these, 96.1 percent were crimes against property, 2.6 percent were crimes against life and body, and 1.4 percent were information-related crimes. | How many more non-gang robberies were there compared to gang robberies and arson cases combined? | 2514c62c-103f-4e5e-a642-551173770357 | {
"number": "175",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [],
"date": [],
"spans": [],
"worker_id": [],
"hit_id": []
} |
history_2180 | According to police statistics, the most common complaint received by the Metropolitan Police Bureau in 2010 was housebreaking, with 12,347 cases. This was followed by 5,504 cases of motorcycle thefts, 3,694 cases of assault and 2,836 cases of embezzlement. Serious offences included 183 murders, 81 gang robberies, 265 robberies, 1 kidnapping and 9 arson cases. Offences against the state were by far more common, and included 54,068 drug-related cases, 17,239 cases involving prostitution and 8,634 related to gambling. The Thailand Crime Victim Survey conducted by the Office of Justice Affairs of the Ministry of Justice found that 2.7 percent of surveyed households reported a member being victim of a crime in 2007. Of these, 96.1 percent were crimes against property, 2.6 percent were crimes against life and body, and 1.4 percent were information-related crimes. | How many more murders were there compared to gang robberies and kidnappings combined? | 59886f6d-d45e-4b47-b565-c6a6881bc02a | {
"number": "101",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [],
"date": [],
"spans": [],
"worker_id": [],
"hit_id": []
} |
history_2180 | According to police statistics, the most common complaint received by the Metropolitan Police Bureau in 2010 was housebreaking, with 12,347 cases. This was followed by 5,504 cases of motorcycle thefts, 3,694 cases of assault and 2,836 cases of embezzlement. Serious offences included 183 murders, 81 gang robberies, 265 robberies, 1 kidnapping and 9 arson cases. Offences against the state were by far more common, and included 54,068 drug-related cases, 17,239 cases involving prostitution and 8,634 related to gambling. The Thailand Crime Victim Survey conducted by the Office of Justice Affairs of the Ministry of Justice found that 2.7 percent of surveyed households reported a member being victim of a crime in 2007. Of these, 96.1 percent were crimes against property, 2.6 percent were crimes against life and body, and 1.4 percent were information-related crimes. | How many cases of housebreaking, assault, and embezzlement were there combined? | 8becd4d1-f448-42f9-a07c-bf42813edb98 | {
"number": "18877",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [],
"date": [],
"spans": [],
"worker_id": [],
"hit_id": []
} |
history_2180 | According to police statistics, the most common complaint received by the Metropolitan Police Bureau in 2010 was housebreaking, with 12,347 cases. This was followed by 5,504 cases of motorcycle thefts, 3,694 cases of assault and 2,836 cases of embezzlement. Serious offences included 183 murders, 81 gang robberies, 265 robberies, 1 kidnapping and 9 arson cases. Offences against the state were by far more common, and included 54,068 drug-related cases, 17,239 cases involving prostitution and 8,634 related to gambling. The Thailand Crime Victim Survey conducted by the Office of Justice Affairs of the Ministry of Justice found that 2.7 percent of surveyed households reported a member being victim of a crime in 2007. Of these, 96.1 percent were crimes against property, 2.6 percent were crimes against life and body, and 1.4 percent were information-related crimes. | Which crimes had fewer than 10 cases reported? | 6c96f909-4f2b-416c-b560-1e0661567358 | {
"number": "",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [
"arson cases",
"kidnapping"
],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [],
"date": [],
"spans": [],
"worker_id": [],
"hit_id": []
} |
history_2180 | According to police statistics, the most common complaint received by the Metropolitan Police Bureau in 2010 was housebreaking, with 12,347 cases. This was followed by 5,504 cases of motorcycle thefts, 3,694 cases of assault and 2,836 cases of embezzlement. Serious offences included 183 murders, 81 gang robberies, 265 robberies, 1 kidnapping and 9 arson cases. Offences against the state were by far more common, and included 54,068 drug-related cases, 17,239 cases involving prostitution and 8,634 related to gambling. The Thailand Crime Victim Survey conducted by the Office of Justice Affairs of the Ministry of Justice found that 2.7 percent of surveyed households reported a member being victim of a crime in 2007. Of these, 96.1 percent were crimes against property, 2.6 percent were crimes against life and body, and 1.4 percent were information-related crimes. | Which crimes happened between 100 and 300 times? | 4c5e2925-1779-4572-b10d-bbc9b74f8cb8 | {
"number": "",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [
"robberies",
"murders"
],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [],
"date": [],
"spans": [],
"worker_id": [],
"hit_id": []
} |
history_1701 | In October 1932, the Judicial Secretary, A.C.Davies, as directed by the Governor in Council asked the DIG to suggest the names of the revolutionary convicts with a statement showing the offences for which they had been convicted, the sentence awarded and a brief note showing their connection with the revolutionary movement with a view to transferring them to the Andamans. The DIG suggested the names of Yogendra Shukla, Basawon Singh , Shyamdeo Narayan alias Ram Singh, Ishwar Dayal Singh, Kedar Mani Shukla, Mohit Chandra Adhikari and Ram Pratap Singh. Yogendra Shukla, Kedar Mani Shukla and Shyamdeo Narayan were transferred to the Andamans in December, 1932. In 1937, Yogendra Shukla was transferred to Hazaribagh Central Jail as a result of his 46 days of hunger strike. When Sri Krishna Sinha formed the first Congress ministry in 1937, he took up the cause of political prisoners and his ministry resigned on the issue on 15 February 1938. As a result, the Viceroy conceded the demands and Yogendra Shukla along with other political prisoners was released in March, 1938. | How many different names did the DIG suggest? | 760e083b-fd46-4206-913a-04033539ae2e | {
"number": "7",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [
""
],
"date": [
{
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
}
],
"spans": [
[]
],
"worker_id": [
""
],
"hit_id": [
""
]
} |
history_1701 | In October 1932, the Judicial Secretary, A.C.Davies, as directed by the Governor in Council asked the DIG to suggest the names of the revolutionary convicts with a statement showing the offences for which they had been convicted, the sentence awarded and a brief note showing their connection with the revolutionary movement with a view to transferring them to the Andamans. The DIG suggested the names of Yogendra Shukla, Basawon Singh , Shyamdeo Narayan alias Ram Singh, Ishwar Dayal Singh, Kedar Mani Shukla, Mohit Chandra Adhikari and Ram Pratap Singh. Yogendra Shukla, Kedar Mani Shukla and Shyamdeo Narayan were transferred to the Andamans in December, 1932. In 1937, Yogendra Shukla was transferred to Hazaribagh Central Jail as a result of his 46 days of hunger strike. When Sri Krishna Sinha formed the first Congress ministry in 1937, he took up the cause of political prisoners and his ministry resigned on the issue on 15 February 1938. As a result, the Viceroy conceded the demands and Yogendra Shukla along with other political prisoners was released in March, 1938. | How many months did it take for the Viceroy to concede the demands after Sri Krishna Sinha resigned? | 64f0ff4c-79ca-4589-a014-53f184faf78b | {
"number": "1",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [
""
],
"date": [
{
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
}
],
"spans": [
[]
],
"worker_id": [
""
],
"hit_id": [
""
]
} |
history_1701 | In October 1932, the Judicial Secretary, A.C.Davies, as directed by the Governor in Council asked the DIG to suggest the names of the revolutionary convicts with a statement showing the offences for which they had been convicted, the sentence awarded and a brief note showing their connection with the revolutionary movement with a view to transferring them to the Andamans. The DIG suggested the names of Yogendra Shukla, Basawon Singh , Shyamdeo Narayan alias Ram Singh, Ishwar Dayal Singh, Kedar Mani Shukla, Mohit Chandra Adhikari and Ram Pratap Singh. Yogendra Shukla, Kedar Mani Shukla and Shyamdeo Narayan were transferred to the Andamans in December, 1932. In 1937, Yogendra Shukla was transferred to Hazaribagh Central Jail as a result of his 46 days of hunger strike. When Sri Krishna Sinha formed the first Congress ministry in 1937, he took up the cause of political prisoners and his ministry resigned on the issue on 15 February 1938. As a result, the Viceroy conceded the demands and Yogendra Shukla along with other political prisoners was released in March, 1938. | How many names were a part of the DIG? | e866d28d-ff7e-403e-a91c-7ef485f4b14e | {
"number": "7",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [
""
],
"date": [
{
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
}
],
"spans": [
[]
],
"worker_id": [
""
],
"hit_id": [
""
]
} |
history_1701 | In October 1932, the Judicial Secretary, A.C.Davies, as directed by the Governor in Council asked the DIG to suggest the names of the revolutionary convicts with a statement showing the offences for which they had been convicted, the sentence awarded and a brief note showing their connection with the revolutionary movement with a view to transferring them to the Andamans. The DIG suggested the names of Yogendra Shukla, Basawon Singh , Shyamdeo Narayan alias Ram Singh, Ishwar Dayal Singh, Kedar Mani Shukla, Mohit Chandra Adhikari and Ram Pratap Singh. Yogendra Shukla, Kedar Mani Shukla and Shyamdeo Narayan were transferred to the Andamans in December, 1932. In 1937, Yogendra Shukla was transferred to Hazaribagh Central Jail as a result of his 46 days of hunger strike. When Sri Krishna Sinha formed the first Congress ministry in 1937, he took up the cause of political prisoners and his ministry resigned on the issue on 15 February 1938. As a result, the Viceroy conceded the demands and Yogendra Shukla along with other political prisoners was released in March, 1938. | How many names did DIG suggest of the people connected with the revolutionary movement to the Judicial Secretary A.C.Davies? | b4176b67-fbff-4ac7-8d06-797e34730ccb | {
"number": "7",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [
""
],
"date": [
{
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
}
],
"spans": [
[]
],
"worker_id": [
""
],
"hit_id": [
""
]
} |
history_1701 | In October 1932, the Judicial Secretary, A.C.Davies, as directed by the Governor in Council asked the DIG to suggest the names of the revolutionary convicts with a statement showing the offences for which they had been convicted, the sentence awarded and a brief note showing their connection with the revolutionary movement with a view to transferring them to the Andamans. The DIG suggested the names of Yogendra Shukla, Basawon Singh , Shyamdeo Narayan alias Ram Singh, Ishwar Dayal Singh, Kedar Mani Shukla, Mohit Chandra Adhikari and Ram Pratap Singh. Yogendra Shukla, Kedar Mani Shukla and Shyamdeo Narayan were transferred to the Andamans in December, 1932. In 1937, Yogendra Shukla was transferred to Hazaribagh Central Jail as a result of his 46 days of hunger strike. When Sri Krishna Sinha formed the first Congress ministry in 1937, he took up the cause of political prisoners and his ministry resigned on the issue on 15 February 1938. As a result, the Viceroy conceded the demands and Yogendra Shukla along with other political prisoners was released in March, 1938. | How many years after Yogendra Shukla was transferred to the Andamans was he transferred to Hazaribagh Central Jail as a result of his 46 days of hunger strike? | e3550f0d-f1b5-44f4-9d90-1ded1ea75c15 | {
"number": "5",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [
""
],
"date": [
{
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
}
],
"spans": [
[]
],
"worker_id": [
""
],
"hit_id": [
""
]
} |
history_1701 | In October 1932, the Judicial Secretary, A.C.Davies, as directed by the Governor in Council asked the DIG to suggest the names of the revolutionary convicts with a statement showing the offences for which they had been convicted, the sentence awarded and a brief note showing their connection with the revolutionary movement with a view to transferring them to the Andamans. The DIG suggested the names of Yogendra Shukla, Basawon Singh , Shyamdeo Narayan alias Ram Singh, Ishwar Dayal Singh, Kedar Mani Shukla, Mohit Chandra Adhikari and Ram Pratap Singh. Yogendra Shukla, Kedar Mani Shukla and Shyamdeo Narayan were transferred to the Andamans in December, 1932. In 1937, Yogendra Shukla was transferred to Hazaribagh Central Jail as a result of his 46 days of hunger strike. When Sri Krishna Sinha formed the first Congress ministry in 1937, he took up the cause of political prisoners and his ministry resigned on the issue on 15 February 1938. As a result, the Viceroy conceded the demands and Yogendra Shukla along with other political prisoners was released in March, 1938. | after a year Yogendra Shukla was transferred, who came to power | 98677ab7-53d2-42c1-9bb6-068a86bc2a38 | {
"number": "",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [
"Sri Krishna Sinha"
],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [
""
],
"date": [
{
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
}
],
"spans": [
[]
],
"worker_id": [
""
],
"hit_id": [
""
]
} |
history_1701 | In October 1932, the Judicial Secretary, A.C.Davies, as directed by the Governor in Council asked the DIG to suggest the names of the revolutionary convicts with a statement showing the offences for which they had been convicted, the sentence awarded and a brief note showing their connection with the revolutionary movement with a view to transferring them to the Andamans. The DIG suggested the names of Yogendra Shukla, Basawon Singh , Shyamdeo Narayan alias Ram Singh, Ishwar Dayal Singh, Kedar Mani Shukla, Mohit Chandra Adhikari and Ram Pratap Singh. Yogendra Shukla, Kedar Mani Shukla and Shyamdeo Narayan were transferred to the Andamans in December, 1932. In 1937, Yogendra Shukla was transferred to Hazaribagh Central Jail as a result of his 46 days of hunger strike. When Sri Krishna Sinha formed the first Congress ministry in 1937, he took up the cause of political prisoners and his ministry resigned on the issue on 15 February 1938. As a result, the Viceroy conceded the demands and Yogendra Shukla along with other political prisoners was released in March, 1938. | after how many years did Yogendra Shukla was transferred | 1551c107-4980-4ec1-88b2-d260aaddde4d | {
"number": "5",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [
""
],
"date": [
{
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
}
],
"spans": [
[]
],
"worker_id": [
""
],
"hit_id": [
""
]
} |
history_1701 | In October 1932, the Judicial Secretary, A.C.Davies, as directed by the Governor in Council asked the DIG to suggest the names of the revolutionary convicts with a statement showing the offences for which they had been convicted, the sentence awarded and a brief note showing their connection with the revolutionary movement with a view to transferring them to the Andamans. The DIG suggested the names of Yogendra Shukla, Basawon Singh , Shyamdeo Narayan alias Ram Singh, Ishwar Dayal Singh, Kedar Mani Shukla, Mohit Chandra Adhikari and Ram Pratap Singh. Yogendra Shukla, Kedar Mani Shukla and Shyamdeo Narayan were transferred to the Andamans in December, 1932. In 1937, Yogendra Shukla was transferred to Hazaribagh Central Jail as a result of his 46 days of hunger strike. When Sri Krishna Sinha formed the first Congress ministry in 1937, he took up the cause of political prisoners and his ministry resigned on the issue on 15 February 1938. As a result, the Viceroy conceded the demands and Yogendra Shukla along with other political prisoners was released in March, 1938. | How many convicts had been transferred to the Andamans in December of 1932? | 8e4f6aa0-a958-4ec7-91ca-dd44119ad42d | {
"number": "3",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [
""
],
"date": [
{
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
}
],
"spans": [
[]
],
"worker_id": [
""
],
"hit_id": [
""
]
} |
history_1701 | In October 1932, the Judicial Secretary, A.C.Davies, as directed by the Governor in Council asked the DIG to suggest the names of the revolutionary convicts with a statement showing the offences for which they had been convicted, the sentence awarded and a brief note showing their connection with the revolutionary movement with a view to transferring them to the Andamans. The DIG suggested the names of Yogendra Shukla, Basawon Singh , Shyamdeo Narayan alias Ram Singh, Ishwar Dayal Singh, Kedar Mani Shukla, Mohit Chandra Adhikari and Ram Pratap Singh. Yogendra Shukla, Kedar Mani Shukla and Shyamdeo Narayan were transferred to the Andamans in December, 1932. In 1937, Yogendra Shukla was transferred to Hazaribagh Central Jail as a result of his 46 days of hunger strike. When Sri Krishna Sinha formed the first Congress ministry in 1937, he took up the cause of political prisoners and his ministry resigned on the issue on 15 February 1938. As a result, the Viceroy conceded the demands and Yogendra Shukla along with other political prisoners was released in March, 1938. | How many times was Yogendra Shukla transferred as a prisoner before he eventually got released in 1938? | a2dd8907-f015-4ddd-9122-fc283520f234 | {
"number": "2",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [
""
],
"date": [
{
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
}
],
"spans": [
[]
],
"worker_id": [
""
],
"hit_id": [
""
]
} |
history_1701 | In October 1932, the Judicial Secretary, A.C.Davies, as directed by the Governor in Council asked the DIG to suggest the names of the revolutionary convicts with a statement showing the offences for which they had been convicted, the sentence awarded and a brief note showing their connection with the revolutionary movement with a view to transferring them to the Andamans. The DIG suggested the names of Yogendra Shukla, Basawon Singh , Shyamdeo Narayan alias Ram Singh, Ishwar Dayal Singh, Kedar Mani Shukla, Mohit Chandra Adhikari and Ram Pratap Singh. Yogendra Shukla, Kedar Mani Shukla and Shyamdeo Narayan were transferred to the Andamans in December, 1932. In 1937, Yogendra Shukla was transferred to Hazaribagh Central Jail as a result of his 46 days of hunger strike. When Sri Krishna Sinha formed the first Congress ministry in 1937, he took up the cause of political prisoners and his ministry resigned on the issue on 15 February 1938. As a result, the Viceroy conceded the demands and Yogendra Shukla along with other political prisoners was released in March, 1938. | How many years after the prisoners DIGs suggested were transferred to the Andamans was Yogendra Shukla transferred to Hazaribagh Central Jail as a result of his 46 days of hunger strike? | a598dd37-a149-41c2-9c60-9daa35e61878 | {
"number": "5",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [],
"date": [],
"spans": [],
"worker_id": [],
"hit_id": []
} |
history_1701 | In October 1932, the Judicial Secretary, A.C.Davies, as directed by the Governor in Council asked the DIG to suggest the names of the revolutionary convicts with a statement showing the offences for which they had been convicted, the sentence awarded and a brief note showing their connection with the revolutionary movement with a view to transferring them to the Andamans. The DIG suggested the names of Yogendra Shukla, Basawon Singh , Shyamdeo Narayan alias Ram Singh, Ishwar Dayal Singh, Kedar Mani Shukla, Mohit Chandra Adhikari and Ram Pratap Singh. Yogendra Shukla, Kedar Mani Shukla and Shyamdeo Narayan were transferred to the Andamans in December, 1932. In 1937, Yogendra Shukla was transferred to Hazaribagh Central Jail as a result of his 46 days of hunger strike. When Sri Krishna Sinha formed the first Congress ministry in 1937, he took up the cause of political prisoners and his ministry resigned on the issue on 15 February 1938. As a result, the Viceroy conceded the demands and Yogendra Shukla along with other political prisoners was released in March, 1938. | How many months after Sri Krishna Sinha formed the first Congress ministry and took up the cause of political prisoners was Yogendra Shukla and others relased? | 37cd85fe-bd20-4485-88a0-67be70cbb55f | {
"number": "1",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [],
"date": [],
"spans": [],
"worker_id": [],
"hit_id": []
} |
history_1701 | In October 1932, the Judicial Secretary, A.C.Davies, as directed by the Governor in Council asked the DIG to suggest the names of the revolutionary convicts with a statement showing the offences for which they had been convicted, the sentence awarded and a brief note showing their connection with the revolutionary movement with a view to transferring them to the Andamans. The DIG suggested the names of Yogendra Shukla, Basawon Singh , Shyamdeo Narayan alias Ram Singh, Ishwar Dayal Singh, Kedar Mani Shukla, Mohit Chandra Adhikari and Ram Pratap Singh. Yogendra Shukla, Kedar Mani Shukla and Shyamdeo Narayan were transferred to the Andamans in December, 1932. In 1937, Yogendra Shukla was transferred to Hazaribagh Central Jail as a result of his 46 days of hunger strike. When Sri Krishna Sinha formed the first Congress ministry in 1937, he took up the cause of political prisoners and his ministry resigned on the issue on 15 February 1938. As a result, the Viceroy conceded the demands and Yogendra Shukla along with other political prisoners was released in March, 1938. | How many months after the Judicial Secretary asked the DIG to suggest the names of the revolutionary convicts were the names of the people they suggested transferred to the Andamans? | 07faa780-c3ef-43f3-85fd-130a89bd5383 | {
"number": "2",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [],
"date": [],
"spans": [],
"worker_id": [],
"hit_id": []
} |
history_1701 | In October 1932, the Judicial Secretary, A.C.Davies, as directed by the Governor in Council asked the DIG to suggest the names of the revolutionary convicts with a statement showing the offences for which they had been convicted, the sentence awarded and a brief note showing their connection with the revolutionary movement with a view to transferring them to the Andamans. The DIG suggested the names of Yogendra Shukla, Basawon Singh , Shyamdeo Narayan alias Ram Singh, Ishwar Dayal Singh, Kedar Mani Shukla, Mohit Chandra Adhikari and Ram Pratap Singh. Yogendra Shukla, Kedar Mani Shukla and Shyamdeo Narayan were transferred to the Andamans in December, 1932. In 1937, Yogendra Shukla was transferred to Hazaribagh Central Jail as a result of his 46 days of hunger strike. When Sri Krishna Sinha formed the first Congress ministry in 1937, he took up the cause of political prisoners and his ministry resigned on the issue on 15 February 1938. As a result, the Viceroy conceded the demands and Yogendra Shukla along with other political prisoners was released in March, 1938. | How many names were suggested by the DIG to transfer to the Andamans? | 55fcce73-dc42-48b2-8c15-0e345a3d76fe | {
"number": "7",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [],
"date": [],
"spans": [],
"worker_id": [],
"hit_id": []
} |
history_1701 | In October 1932, the Judicial Secretary, A.C.Davies, as directed by the Governor in Council asked the DIG to suggest the names of the revolutionary convicts with a statement showing the offences for which they had been convicted, the sentence awarded and a brief note showing their connection with the revolutionary movement with a view to transferring them to the Andamans. The DIG suggested the names of Yogendra Shukla, Basawon Singh , Shyamdeo Narayan alias Ram Singh, Ishwar Dayal Singh, Kedar Mani Shukla, Mohit Chandra Adhikari and Ram Pratap Singh. Yogendra Shukla, Kedar Mani Shukla and Shyamdeo Narayan were transferred to the Andamans in December, 1932. In 1937, Yogendra Shukla was transferred to Hazaribagh Central Jail as a result of his 46 days of hunger strike. When Sri Krishna Sinha formed the first Congress ministry in 1937, he took up the cause of political prisoners and his ministry resigned on the issue on 15 February 1938. As a result, the Viceroy conceded the demands and Yogendra Shukla along with other political prisoners was released in March, 1938. | How many of the 7 mentioned were actually transferred to the Andamans? | 136bb3a9-6cbd-4471-a375-7f57ef1bd271 | {
"number": "3",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [],
"date": [],
"spans": [],
"worker_id": [],
"hit_id": []
} |
history_1701 | In October 1932, the Judicial Secretary, A.C.Davies, as directed by the Governor in Council asked the DIG to suggest the names of the revolutionary convicts with a statement showing the offences for which they had been convicted, the sentence awarded and a brief note showing their connection with the revolutionary movement with a view to transferring them to the Andamans. The DIG suggested the names of Yogendra Shukla, Basawon Singh , Shyamdeo Narayan alias Ram Singh, Ishwar Dayal Singh, Kedar Mani Shukla, Mohit Chandra Adhikari and Ram Pratap Singh. Yogendra Shukla, Kedar Mani Shukla and Shyamdeo Narayan were transferred to the Andamans in December, 1932. In 1937, Yogendra Shukla was transferred to Hazaribagh Central Jail as a result of his 46 days of hunger strike. When Sri Krishna Sinha formed the first Congress ministry in 1937, he took up the cause of political prisoners and his ministry resigned on the issue on 15 February 1938. As a result, the Viceroy conceded the demands and Yogendra Shukla along with other political prisoners was released in March, 1938. | How many years did it take for Krishna Sinha's Congress ministry to resign? | 01899321-fa50-4df2-a8c7-75a0b266d0da | {
"number": "1",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [],
"date": [],
"spans": [],
"worker_id": [],
"hit_id": []
} |
history_1701 | In October 1932, the Judicial Secretary, A.C.Davies, as directed by the Governor in Council asked the DIG to suggest the names of the revolutionary convicts with a statement showing the offences for which they had been convicted, the sentence awarded and a brief note showing their connection with the revolutionary movement with a view to transferring them to the Andamans. The DIG suggested the names of Yogendra Shukla, Basawon Singh , Shyamdeo Narayan alias Ram Singh, Ishwar Dayal Singh, Kedar Mani Shukla, Mohit Chandra Adhikari and Ram Pratap Singh. Yogendra Shukla, Kedar Mani Shukla and Shyamdeo Narayan were transferred to the Andamans in December, 1932. In 1937, Yogendra Shukla was transferred to Hazaribagh Central Jail as a result of his 46 days of hunger strike. When Sri Krishna Sinha formed the first Congress ministry in 1937, he took up the cause of political prisoners and his ministry resigned on the issue on 15 February 1938. As a result, the Viceroy conceded the demands and Yogendra Shukla along with other political prisoners was released in March, 1938. | How many months after Krishna Sinha's ministry's resignation did the Viceroy concede the demands? | 8c96ce17-28e9-4e84-8d15-58763716f735 | {
"number": "1",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [],
"date": [],
"spans": [],
"worker_id": [],
"hit_id": []
} |
history_1701 | In October 1932, the Judicial Secretary, A.C.Davies, as directed by the Governor in Council asked the DIG to suggest the names of the revolutionary convicts with a statement showing the offences for which they had been convicted, the sentence awarded and a brief note showing their connection with the revolutionary movement with a view to transferring them to the Andamans. The DIG suggested the names of Yogendra Shukla, Basawon Singh , Shyamdeo Narayan alias Ram Singh, Ishwar Dayal Singh, Kedar Mani Shukla, Mohit Chandra Adhikari and Ram Pratap Singh. Yogendra Shukla, Kedar Mani Shukla and Shyamdeo Narayan were transferred to the Andamans in December, 1932. In 1937, Yogendra Shukla was transferred to Hazaribagh Central Jail as a result of his 46 days of hunger strike. When Sri Krishna Sinha formed the first Congress ministry in 1937, he took up the cause of political prisoners and his ministry resigned on the issue on 15 February 1938. As a result, the Viceroy conceded the demands and Yogendra Shukla along with other political prisoners was released in March, 1938. | How many names were suggested by the DIG? | e735c9d4-43e4-4713-98c6-e55897357813 | {
"number": "7",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [],
"date": [],
"spans": [],
"worker_id": [],
"hit_id": []
} |
history_1579 | Vest Recklinghausen was first mentioned in 1228 as a fiefdom of the Archbishopric of Cologne and thus it belonged to the Electoral Rhenish Circle. The administrator lived in castle Westerholt, located in Herten. From 1446 to 1576 it was used as collateral, first pawned to the lords of Gemen and after 1492 to the Lords of Schauenburg and Holstein-Pinneberg, who pawned the territory back to the Archbishops of Cologne in 1576. During the Cologne War , Vest Recklinghausen was occupied and sacked several times by troops from both sides of the conflict. In 1583, although much of the territory was already Protestant, the Calvinist Elector of Cologne, Gebhard, Truchsess von Waldburg and his wife, Agnes, ordered the destruction of the icons and decorative elements of the churches. In 1584, the territory was sacked again, this time by the competing archbishop, Ernst of Bavaria. In 1586, the territory was invaded by Martin Schenck and Hermann Cloedt, who caused great damage to the farms and small villages, and were besieged by Claude de Berlaymont, also known as Haultpenne, in the city of Werl. | How many years was castle Westerholt used as collateral? | b13729db-87e4-481f-81ad-72283641d3d7 | {
"number": "130",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [
""
],
"date": [
{
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
}
],
"spans": [
[]
],
"worker_id": [
""
],
"hit_id": [
""
]
} |
history_1579 | Vest Recklinghausen was first mentioned in 1228 as a fiefdom of the Archbishopric of Cologne and thus it belonged to the Electoral Rhenish Circle. The administrator lived in castle Westerholt, located in Herten. From 1446 to 1576 it was used as collateral, first pawned to the lords of Gemen and after 1492 to the Lords of Schauenburg and Holstein-Pinneberg, who pawned the territory back to the Archbishops of Cologne in 1576. During the Cologne War , Vest Recklinghausen was occupied and sacked several times by troops from both sides of the conflict. In 1583, although much of the territory was already Protestant, the Calvinist Elector of Cologne, Gebhard, Truchsess von Waldburg and his wife, Agnes, ordered the destruction of the icons and decorative elements of the churches. In 1584, the territory was sacked again, this time by the competing archbishop, Ernst of Bavaria. In 1586, the territory was invaded by Martin Schenck and Hermann Cloedt, who caused great damage to the farms and small villages, and were besieged by Claude de Berlaymont, also known as Haultpenne, in the city of Werl. | What was Haultpenne's other name? | e74c6e6a-4be7-497c-a400-34d8c46caa2f | {
"number": "",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [
"Claude de Berlaymont"
],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [
""
],
"date": [
{
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
}
],
"spans": [
[]
],
"worker_id": [
""
],
"hit_id": [
""
]
} |
history_1579 | Vest Recklinghausen was first mentioned in 1228 as a fiefdom of the Archbishopric of Cologne and thus it belonged to the Electoral Rhenish Circle. The administrator lived in castle Westerholt, located in Herten. From 1446 to 1576 it was used as collateral, first pawned to the lords of Gemen and after 1492 to the Lords of Schauenburg and Holstein-Pinneberg, who pawned the territory back to the Archbishops of Cologne in 1576. During the Cologne War , Vest Recklinghausen was occupied and sacked several times by troops from both sides of the conflict. In 1583, although much of the territory was already Protestant, the Calvinist Elector of Cologne, Gebhard, Truchsess von Waldburg and his wife, Agnes, ordered the destruction of the icons and decorative elements of the churches. In 1584, the territory was sacked again, this time by the competing archbishop, Ernst of Bavaria. In 1586, the territory was invaded by Martin Schenck and Hermann Cloedt, who caused great damage to the farms and small villages, and were besieged by Claude de Berlaymont, also known as Haultpenne, in the city of Werl. | How many years was Vest Recklinghausen used as collateral? | b9454b86-57eb-4a49-b2ba-8fd630262ad7 | {
"number": "130",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [
""
],
"date": [
{
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
}
],
"spans": [
[]
],
"worker_id": [
""
],
"hit_id": [
""
]
} |
history_1579 | Vest Recklinghausen was first mentioned in 1228 as a fiefdom of the Archbishopric of Cologne and thus it belonged to the Electoral Rhenish Circle. The administrator lived in castle Westerholt, located in Herten. From 1446 to 1576 it was used as collateral, first pawned to the lords of Gemen and after 1492 to the Lords of Schauenburg and Holstein-Pinneberg, who pawned the territory back to the Archbishops of Cologne in 1576. During the Cologne War , Vest Recklinghausen was occupied and sacked several times by troops from both sides of the conflict. In 1583, although much of the territory was already Protestant, the Calvinist Elector of Cologne, Gebhard, Truchsess von Waldburg and his wife, Agnes, ordered the destruction of the icons and decorative elements of the churches. In 1584, the territory was sacked again, this time by the competing archbishop, Ernst of Bavaria. In 1586, the territory was invaded by Martin Schenck and Hermann Cloedt, who caused great damage to the farms and small villages, and were besieged by Claude de Berlaymont, also known as Haultpenne, in the city of Werl. | How many years passed between the first pawning of Vest Recklinghausen and the second pawning? | c4527182-4340-4f22-a8cb-3e1e59aef5a1 | {
"number": "84",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [
""
],
"date": [
{
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
}
],
"spans": [
[]
],
"worker_id": [
""
],
"hit_id": [
""
]
} |
history_1579 | Vest Recklinghausen was first mentioned in 1228 as a fiefdom of the Archbishopric of Cologne and thus it belonged to the Electoral Rhenish Circle. The administrator lived in castle Westerholt, located in Herten. From 1446 to 1576 it was used as collateral, first pawned to the lords of Gemen and after 1492 to the Lords of Schauenburg and Holstein-Pinneberg, who pawned the territory back to the Archbishops of Cologne in 1576. During the Cologne War , Vest Recklinghausen was occupied and sacked several times by troops from both sides of the conflict. In 1583, although much of the territory was already Protestant, the Calvinist Elector of Cologne, Gebhard, Truchsess von Waldburg and his wife, Agnes, ordered the destruction of the icons and decorative elements of the churches. In 1584, the territory was sacked again, this time by the competing archbishop, Ernst of Bavaria. In 1586, the territory was invaded by Martin Schenck and Hermann Cloedt, who caused great damage to the farms and small villages, and were besieged by Claude de Berlaymont, also known as Haultpenne, in the city of Werl. | Which happened first, von Waldubrg destroying religious artifacts or Schenck damaging farms and villages? | 71675ca5-47d8-42a7-8acd-4a0bd676b821 | {
"number": "",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [
"destruction of the icons"
],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [
""
],
"date": [
{
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
}
],
"spans": [
[]
],
"worker_id": [
""
],
"hit_id": [
""
]
} |
history_1579 | Vest Recklinghausen was first mentioned in 1228 as a fiefdom of the Archbishopric of Cologne and thus it belonged to the Electoral Rhenish Circle. The administrator lived in castle Westerholt, located in Herten. From 1446 to 1576 it was used as collateral, first pawned to the lords of Gemen and after 1492 to the Lords of Schauenburg and Holstein-Pinneberg, who pawned the territory back to the Archbishops of Cologne in 1576. During the Cologne War , Vest Recklinghausen was occupied and sacked several times by troops from both sides of the conflict. In 1583, although much of the territory was already Protestant, the Calvinist Elector of Cologne, Gebhard, Truchsess von Waldburg and his wife, Agnes, ordered the destruction of the icons and decorative elements of the churches. In 1584, the territory was sacked again, this time by the competing archbishop, Ernst of Bavaria. In 1586, the territory was invaded by Martin Schenck and Hermann Cloedt, who caused great damage to the farms and small villages, and were besieged by Claude de Berlaymont, also known as Haultpenne, in the city of Werl. | How many years was Vest Recklinghausen used as collateral? | ee25014b-e3dc-4806-93dd-a1d26159e731 | {
"number": "130",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [
""
],
"date": [
{
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
}
],
"spans": [
[]
],
"worker_id": [
""
],
"hit_id": [
""
]
} |
history_1579 | Vest Recklinghausen was first mentioned in 1228 as a fiefdom of the Archbishopric of Cologne and thus it belonged to the Electoral Rhenish Circle. The administrator lived in castle Westerholt, located in Herten. From 1446 to 1576 it was used as collateral, first pawned to the lords of Gemen and after 1492 to the Lords of Schauenburg and Holstein-Pinneberg, who pawned the territory back to the Archbishops of Cologne in 1576. During the Cologne War , Vest Recklinghausen was occupied and sacked several times by troops from both sides of the conflict. In 1583, although much of the territory was already Protestant, the Calvinist Elector of Cologne, Gebhard, Truchsess von Waldburg and his wife, Agnes, ordered the destruction of the icons and decorative elements of the churches. In 1584, the territory was sacked again, this time by the competing archbishop, Ernst of Bavaria. In 1586, the territory was invaded by Martin Schenck and Hermann Cloedt, who caused great damage to the farms and small villages, and were besieged by Claude de Berlaymont, also known as Haultpenne, in the city of Werl. | How many years did the lords of Gemen control Vest Recklinghausen before pawning it to the Lords of Schauenburg and Holstein-Pinneberg? | f041693f-5de2-4ffc-bf58-2bf7579c5c06 | {
"number": "46",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [
""
],
"date": [
{
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
}
],
"spans": [
[]
],
"worker_id": [
""
],
"hit_id": [
""
]
} |
history_1579 | Vest Recklinghausen was first mentioned in 1228 as a fiefdom of the Archbishopric of Cologne and thus it belonged to the Electoral Rhenish Circle. The administrator lived in castle Westerholt, located in Herten. From 1446 to 1576 it was used as collateral, first pawned to the lords of Gemen and after 1492 to the Lords of Schauenburg and Holstein-Pinneberg, who pawned the territory back to the Archbishops of Cologne in 1576. During the Cologne War , Vest Recklinghausen was occupied and sacked several times by troops from both sides of the conflict. In 1583, although much of the territory was already Protestant, the Calvinist Elector of Cologne, Gebhard, Truchsess von Waldburg and his wife, Agnes, ordered the destruction of the icons and decorative elements of the churches. In 1584, the territory was sacked again, this time by the competing archbishop, Ernst of Bavaria. In 1586, the territory was invaded by Martin Schenck and Hermann Cloedt, who caused great damage to the farms and small villages, and were besieged by Claude de Berlaymont, also known as Haultpenne, in the city of Werl. | How many years did the Lords of Schauenburg and Holstein-Pinneberg control Vest Recklinghausen before pawning it to the Archbishops of Cologne? | 825d767b-a04f-42ce-8063-beafb57536a4 | {
"number": "84",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [
""
],
"date": [
{
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
}
],
"spans": [
[]
],
"worker_id": [
""
],
"hit_id": [
""
]
} |
history_1579 | Vest Recklinghausen was first mentioned in 1228 as a fiefdom of the Archbishopric of Cologne and thus it belonged to the Electoral Rhenish Circle. The administrator lived in castle Westerholt, located in Herten. From 1446 to 1576 it was used as collateral, first pawned to the lords of Gemen and after 1492 to the Lords of Schauenburg and Holstein-Pinneberg, who pawned the territory back to the Archbishops of Cologne in 1576. During the Cologne War , Vest Recklinghausen was occupied and sacked several times by troops from both sides of the conflict. In 1583, although much of the territory was already Protestant, the Calvinist Elector of Cologne, Gebhard, Truchsess von Waldburg and his wife, Agnes, ordered the destruction of the icons and decorative elements of the churches. In 1584, the territory was sacked again, this time by the competing archbishop, Ernst of Bavaria. In 1586, the territory was invaded by Martin Schenck and Hermann Cloedt, who caused great damage to the farms and small villages, and were besieged by Claude de Berlaymont, also known as Haultpenne, in the city of Werl. | Who sacked Vest Recklinghausen first, Ernst of Bavaria or Martin Schenck and Hermann Cloedt? | 45fbb3d2-ed6c-4190-8fd6-b126a64cd06a | {
"number": "",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [
"Ernst of Bavaria"
],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [
""
],
"date": [
{
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
}
],
"spans": [
[]
],
"worker_id": [
""
],
"hit_id": [
""
]
} |
history_1579 | Vest Recklinghausen was first mentioned in 1228 as a fiefdom of the Archbishopric of Cologne and thus it belonged to the Electoral Rhenish Circle. The administrator lived in castle Westerholt, located in Herten. From 1446 to 1576 it was used as collateral, first pawned to the lords of Gemen and after 1492 to the Lords of Schauenburg and Holstein-Pinneberg, who pawned the territory back to the Archbishops of Cologne in 1576. During the Cologne War , Vest Recklinghausen was occupied and sacked several times by troops from both sides of the conflict. In 1583, although much of the territory was already Protestant, the Calvinist Elector of Cologne, Gebhard, Truchsess von Waldburg and his wife, Agnes, ordered the destruction of the icons and decorative elements of the churches. In 1584, the territory was sacked again, this time by the competing archbishop, Ernst of Bavaria. In 1586, the territory was invaded by Martin Schenck and Hermann Cloedt, who caused great damage to the farms and small villages, and were besieged by Claude de Berlaymont, also known as Haultpenne, in the city of Werl. | How many years after being sacked by Ernst of Bavaria was Vest Recklinghausen invaded by Martin Schenck and Hermann Cloedt? | ec8fc60e-3ea8-4e08-bcd2-2fcffd431604 | {
"number": "2",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [
""
],
"date": [
{
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
}
],
"spans": [
[]
],
"worker_id": [
""
],
"hit_id": [
""
]
} |
history_1579 | Vest Recklinghausen was first mentioned in 1228 as a fiefdom of the Archbishopric of Cologne and thus it belonged to the Electoral Rhenish Circle. The administrator lived in castle Westerholt, located in Herten. From 1446 to 1576 it was used as collateral, first pawned to the lords of Gemen and after 1492 to the Lords of Schauenburg and Holstein-Pinneberg, who pawned the territory back to the Archbishops of Cologne in 1576. During the Cologne War , Vest Recklinghausen was occupied and sacked several times by troops from both sides of the conflict. In 1583, although much of the territory was already Protestant, the Calvinist Elector of Cologne, Gebhard, Truchsess von Waldburg and his wife, Agnes, ordered the destruction of the icons and decorative elements of the churches. In 1584, the territory was sacked again, this time by the competing archbishop, Ernst of Bavaria. In 1586, the territory was invaded by Martin Schenck and Hermann Cloedt, who caused great damage to the farms and small villages, and were besieged by Claude de Berlaymont, also known as Haultpenne, in the city of Werl. | How many years was castle Westerholt used as collateral? | 13bb6548-bbbe-487d-a760-a79eaa77e16b | {
"number": "130",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [
""
],
"date": [
{
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
}
],
"spans": [
[]
],
"worker_id": [
""
],
"hit_id": [
""
]
} |
history_1579 | Vest Recklinghausen was first mentioned in 1228 as a fiefdom of the Archbishopric of Cologne and thus it belonged to the Electoral Rhenish Circle. The administrator lived in castle Westerholt, located in Herten. From 1446 to 1576 it was used as collateral, first pawned to the lords of Gemen and after 1492 to the Lords of Schauenburg and Holstein-Pinneberg, who pawned the territory back to the Archbishops of Cologne in 1576. During the Cologne War , Vest Recklinghausen was occupied and sacked several times by troops from both sides of the conflict. In 1583, although much of the territory was already Protestant, the Calvinist Elector of Cologne, Gebhard, Truchsess von Waldburg and his wife, Agnes, ordered the destruction of the icons and decorative elements of the churches. In 1584, the territory was sacked again, this time by the competing archbishop, Ernst of Bavaria. In 1586, the territory was invaded by Martin Schenck and Hermann Cloedt, who caused great damage to the farms and small villages, and were besieged by Claude de Berlaymont, also known as Haultpenne, in the city of Werl. | How many years was castle Westerholt used as collateral? | e141e215-88ef-40b1-b60e-3be0d6c5286b | {
"number": "130",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [
""
],
"date": [
{
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
}
],
"spans": [
[]
],
"worker_id": [
""
],
"hit_id": [
""
]
} |
history_1579 | Vest Recklinghausen was first mentioned in 1228 as a fiefdom of the Archbishopric of Cologne and thus it belonged to the Electoral Rhenish Circle. The administrator lived in castle Westerholt, located in Herten. From 1446 to 1576 it was used as collateral, first pawned to the lords of Gemen and after 1492 to the Lords of Schauenburg and Holstein-Pinneberg, who pawned the territory back to the Archbishops of Cologne in 1576. During the Cologne War , Vest Recklinghausen was occupied and sacked several times by troops from both sides of the conflict. In 1583, although much of the territory was already Protestant, the Calvinist Elector of Cologne, Gebhard, Truchsess von Waldburg and his wife, Agnes, ordered the destruction of the icons and decorative elements of the churches. In 1584, the territory was sacked again, this time by the competing archbishop, Ernst of Bavaria. In 1586, the territory was invaded by Martin Schenck and Hermann Cloedt, who caused great damage to the farms and small villages, and were besieged by Claude de Berlaymont, also known as Haultpenne, in the city of Werl. | What was Vest Recklinghausen? | 485e749c-57a7-4cc5-b3e0-385b56dfd573 | {
"number": "",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [
"a fiefdom"
],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [
""
],
"date": [
{
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
}
],
"spans": [
[]
],
"worker_id": [
""
],
"hit_id": [
""
]
} |
history_1579 | Vest Recklinghausen was first mentioned in 1228 as a fiefdom of the Archbishopric of Cologne and thus it belonged to the Electoral Rhenish Circle. The administrator lived in castle Westerholt, located in Herten. From 1446 to 1576 it was used as collateral, first pawned to the lords of Gemen and after 1492 to the Lords of Schauenburg and Holstein-Pinneberg, who pawned the territory back to the Archbishops of Cologne in 1576. During the Cologne War , Vest Recklinghausen was occupied and sacked several times by troops from both sides of the conflict. In 1583, although much of the territory was already Protestant, the Calvinist Elector of Cologne, Gebhard, Truchsess von Waldburg and his wife, Agnes, ordered the destruction of the icons and decorative elements of the churches. In 1584, the territory was sacked again, this time by the competing archbishop, Ernst of Bavaria. In 1586, the territory was invaded by Martin Schenck and Hermann Cloedt, who caused great damage to the farms and small villages, and were besieged by Claude de Berlaymont, also known as Haultpenne, in the city of Werl. | How many years passed between the pawning of the castle to Archbishops of Cologne and the territory being invaded by Martin Schenck? | 284c7897-6962-4308-9f77-56916f4d930d | {
"number": "10",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [
""
],
"date": [
{
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
}
],
"spans": [
[]
],
"worker_id": [
""
],
"hit_id": [
""
]
} |
history_1579 | Vest Recklinghausen was first mentioned in 1228 as a fiefdom of the Archbishopric of Cologne and thus it belonged to the Electoral Rhenish Circle. The administrator lived in castle Westerholt, located in Herten. From 1446 to 1576 it was used as collateral, first pawned to the lords of Gemen and after 1492 to the Lords of Schauenburg and Holstein-Pinneberg, who pawned the territory back to the Archbishops of Cologne in 1576. During the Cologne War , Vest Recklinghausen was occupied and sacked several times by troops from both sides of the conflict. In 1583, although much of the territory was already Protestant, the Calvinist Elector of Cologne, Gebhard, Truchsess von Waldburg and his wife, Agnes, ordered the destruction of the icons and decorative elements of the churches. In 1584, the territory was sacked again, this time by the competing archbishop, Ernst of Bavaria. In 1586, the territory was invaded by Martin Schenck and Hermann Cloedt, who caused great damage to the farms and small villages, and were besieged by Claude de Berlaymont, also known as Haultpenne, in the city of Werl. | How many years was the time span where Vest Recklinghausen was used as collateral? | 78c5304f-83ef-4ec8-bd91-7a6b7e785fda | {
"number": "130",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [],
"date": [],
"spans": [],
"worker_id": [],
"hit_id": []
} |
nfl_2061 | The 49ers began their season at Qwest Field for an NFC West match against the Seattle Seahawks. In the first quarter, the Niners had the early lead when kicker Joe Nedney made a 23-yard field goal, which was extended in the second quarter when Nedney made another 23-yard field goal. Then, San Francisco failed to maintain it and then fell behind when Seahawks quarterback Matt Hasselbeck got a 1-yard touchdown run, followed by him making a 13-yard touchdown pass to wide receiver Deon Butler. In the third quarter, the 49ers struggled further when quarterback Alex Smith threw an interception to cornerback Marcus Trufant, which was returned 32 yards for a touchdown. This was followed by Hasselbeck's 3-yard touchdown pass to wide receiver Deion Branch. In the fourth quarter, the Niners continued to struggle when kicker Olindo Mare made a 35-yard field goal. | Who made a 23-yard field goal? | 1adeda73-c3bc-47f2-ba8b-785a534b7723 | {
"number": "",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [
"Nedney"
],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [
""
],
"date": [
{
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
}
],
"spans": [
[]
],
"worker_id": [
""
],
"hit_id": [
""
]
} |
nfl_2061 | The 49ers began their season at Qwest Field for an NFC West match against the Seattle Seahawks. In the first quarter, the Niners had the early lead when kicker Joe Nedney made a 23-yard field goal, which was extended in the second quarter when Nedney made another 23-yard field goal. Then, San Francisco failed to maintain it and then fell behind when Seahawks quarterback Matt Hasselbeck got a 1-yard touchdown run, followed by him making a 13-yard touchdown pass to wide receiver Deon Butler. In the third quarter, the 49ers struggled further when quarterback Alex Smith threw an interception to cornerback Marcus Trufant, which was returned 32 yards for a touchdown. This was followed by Hasselbeck's 3-yard touchdown pass to wide receiver Deion Branch. In the fourth quarter, the Niners continued to struggle when kicker Olindo Mare made a 35-yard field goal. | How many field goals did Nedney make? | 13b30719-0d7b-45af-9cea-f716f13ec134 | {
"number": "2",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [
""
],
"date": [
{
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
}
],
"spans": [
[]
],
"worker_id": [
""
],
"hit_id": [
""
]
} |
nfl_2061 | The 49ers began their season at Qwest Field for an NFC West match against the Seattle Seahawks. In the first quarter, the Niners had the early lead when kicker Joe Nedney made a 23-yard field goal, which was extended in the second quarter when Nedney made another 23-yard field goal. Then, San Francisco failed to maintain it and then fell behind when Seahawks quarterback Matt Hasselbeck got a 1-yard touchdown run, followed by him making a 13-yard touchdown pass to wide receiver Deon Butler. In the third quarter, the 49ers struggled further when quarterback Alex Smith threw an interception to cornerback Marcus Trufant, which was returned 32 yards for a touchdown. This was followed by Hasselbeck's 3-yard touchdown pass to wide receiver Deion Branch. In the fourth quarter, the Niners continued to struggle when kicker Olindo Mare made a 35-yard field goal. | Which team does Joe Nedney play for? | 84f44f6c-b1ee-40e9-a463-390f45f97a86 | {
"number": "",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [
"49ers"
],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [
""
],
"date": [
{
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
}
],
"spans": [
[]
],
"worker_id": [
""
],
"hit_id": [
""
]
} |
nfl_2061 | The 49ers began their season at Qwest Field for an NFC West match against the Seattle Seahawks. In the first quarter, the Niners had the early lead when kicker Joe Nedney made a 23-yard field goal, which was extended in the second quarter when Nedney made another 23-yard field goal. Then, San Francisco failed to maintain it and then fell behind when Seahawks quarterback Matt Hasselbeck got a 1-yard touchdown run, followed by him making a 13-yard touchdown pass to wide receiver Deon Butler. In the third quarter, the 49ers struggled further when quarterback Alex Smith threw an interception to cornerback Marcus Trufant, which was returned 32 yards for a touchdown. This was followed by Hasselbeck's 3-yard touchdown pass to wide receiver Deion Branch. In the fourth quarter, the Niners continued to struggle when kicker Olindo Mare made a 35-yard field goal. | What was the longest field goal of the game? | 250529fb-3174-47c9-a71d-c9eb08d24822 | {
"number": "",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [
"35-yard"
],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [
""
],
"date": [
{
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
}
],
"spans": [
[]
],
"worker_id": [
""
],
"hit_id": [
""
]
} |
nfl_2061 | The 49ers began their season at Qwest Field for an NFC West match against the Seattle Seahawks. In the first quarter, the Niners had the early lead when kicker Joe Nedney made a 23-yard field goal, which was extended in the second quarter when Nedney made another 23-yard field goal. Then, San Francisco failed to maintain it and then fell behind when Seahawks quarterback Matt Hasselbeck got a 1-yard touchdown run, followed by him making a 13-yard touchdown pass to wide receiver Deon Butler. In the third quarter, the 49ers struggled further when quarterback Alex Smith threw an interception to cornerback Marcus Trufant, which was returned 32 yards for a touchdown. This was followed by Hasselbeck's 3-yard touchdown pass to wide receiver Deion Branch. In the fourth quarter, the Niners continued to struggle when kicker Olindo Mare made a 35-yard field goal. | How many yards was the longest field goal? | 1e4149f7-8ebf-4adf-aa30-e78a85e63129 | {
"number": "35",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [
""
],
"date": [
{
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
}
],
"spans": [
[]
],
"worker_id": [
""
],
"hit_id": [
""
]
} |
nfl_2061 | The 49ers began their season at Qwest Field for an NFC West match against the Seattle Seahawks. In the first quarter, the Niners had the early lead when kicker Joe Nedney made a 23-yard field goal, which was extended in the second quarter when Nedney made another 23-yard field goal. Then, San Francisco failed to maintain it and then fell behind when Seahawks quarterback Matt Hasselbeck got a 1-yard touchdown run, followed by him making a 13-yard touchdown pass to wide receiver Deon Butler. In the third quarter, the 49ers struggled further when quarterback Alex Smith threw an interception to cornerback Marcus Trufant, which was returned 32 yards for a touchdown. This was followed by Hasselbeck's 3-yard touchdown pass to wide receiver Deion Branch. In the fourth quarter, the Niners continued to struggle when kicker Olindo Mare made a 35-yard field goal. | Which player made the last field goal of the game? | ebe70ee7-f991-4658-907f-da48cbe1d956 | {
"number": "",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [
"Olindo Mare"
],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [
""
],
"date": [
{
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
}
],
"spans": [
[]
],
"worker_id": [
""
],
"hit_id": [
""
]
} |
nfl_2061 | The 49ers began their season at Qwest Field for an NFC West match against the Seattle Seahawks. In the first quarter, the Niners had the early lead when kicker Joe Nedney made a 23-yard field goal, which was extended in the second quarter when Nedney made another 23-yard field goal. Then, San Francisco failed to maintain it and then fell behind when Seahawks quarterback Matt Hasselbeck got a 1-yard touchdown run, followed by him making a 13-yard touchdown pass to wide receiver Deon Butler. In the third quarter, the 49ers struggled further when quarterback Alex Smith threw an interception to cornerback Marcus Trufant, which was returned 32 yards for a touchdown. This was followed by Hasselbeck's 3-yard touchdown pass to wide receiver Deion Branch. In the fourth quarter, the Niners continued to struggle when kicker Olindo Mare made a 35-yard field goal. | Who threw the longest touchdown pass? | 564f3231-d522-4c1f-bc1a-a897f292ba16 | {
"number": "",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [
"Matt Hasselbeck"
],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [
""
],
"date": [
{
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
}
],
"spans": [
[]
],
"worker_id": [
""
],
"hit_id": [
""
]
} |
nfl_2061 | The 49ers began their season at Qwest Field for an NFC West match against the Seattle Seahawks. In the first quarter, the Niners had the early lead when kicker Joe Nedney made a 23-yard field goal, which was extended in the second quarter when Nedney made another 23-yard field goal. Then, San Francisco failed to maintain it and then fell behind when Seahawks quarterback Matt Hasselbeck got a 1-yard touchdown run, followed by him making a 13-yard touchdown pass to wide receiver Deon Butler. In the third quarter, the 49ers struggled further when quarterback Alex Smith threw an interception to cornerback Marcus Trufant, which was returned 32 yards for a touchdown. This was followed by Hasselbeck's 3-yard touchdown pass to wide receiver Deion Branch. In the fourth quarter, the Niners continued to struggle when kicker Olindo Mare made a 35-yard field goal. | How many total field goal yards did Joe Nedney kick? | 24e62de3-613d-46da-8267-554ada9a97c9 | {
"number": "46",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [
""
],
"date": [
{
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
}
],
"spans": [
[]
],
"worker_id": [
""
],
"hit_id": [
""
]
} |
nfl_2061 | The 49ers began their season at Qwest Field for an NFC West match against the Seattle Seahawks. In the first quarter, the Niners had the early lead when kicker Joe Nedney made a 23-yard field goal, which was extended in the second quarter when Nedney made another 23-yard field goal. Then, San Francisco failed to maintain it and then fell behind when Seahawks quarterback Matt Hasselbeck got a 1-yard touchdown run, followed by him making a 13-yard touchdown pass to wide receiver Deon Butler. In the third quarter, the 49ers struggled further when quarterback Alex Smith threw an interception to cornerback Marcus Trufant, which was returned 32 yards for a touchdown. This was followed by Hasselbeck's 3-yard touchdown pass to wide receiver Deion Branch. In the fourth quarter, the Niners continued to struggle when kicker Olindo Mare made a 35-yard field goal. | Which player scored the first field goal of the game? | 5a4b27c2-e6a5-4eec-990e-58ab7d27fbe7 | {
"number": "",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [
"Olindo Mare"
],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [
""
],
"date": [
{
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
}
],
"spans": [
[]
],
"worker_id": [
""
],
"hit_id": [
""
]
} |
nfl_2704 | After suffering a disappointing loss to the previously winless Jaguars the week before, the Browns faced yet another winless opponent in the Oakland Raiders. Both teams struggled for much of the game, kicking a combined five field goals as the Browns held a 9-6 second half lead. At the end of the third quarter the Browns finally got the break they needed when S Joe Haden recovered a Darren McFadden fumble deep in Cleveland territory and returned it 34 yards. Four plays later, QB Brian Hoyer found WR Andrew Hawkins for a four-yard touchdown pass and a 16-6 lead. The Raiders would never recover and the Browns, despite giving up the Raiders' lone touchdown pass from Derek Carr to Andre Holmes with 7 seconds left, won the game 23-13. | How many points were the Browns ahead by at the half? | 577d2b48-de01-4774-b507-bba11358dacb | {
"number": "3",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [
""
],
"date": [
{
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
}
],
"spans": [
[]
],
"worker_id": [
""
],
"hit_id": [
""
]
} |
nfl_2704 | After suffering a disappointing loss to the previously winless Jaguars the week before, the Browns faced yet another winless opponent in the Oakland Raiders. Both teams struggled for much of the game, kicking a combined five field goals as the Browns held a 9-6 second half lead. At the end of the third quarter the Browns finally got the break they needed when S Joe Haden recovered a Darren McFadden fumble deep in Cleveland territory and returned it 34 yards. Four plays later, QB Brian Hoyer found WR Andrew Hawkins for a four-yard touchdown pass and a 16-6 lead. The Raiders would never recover and the Browns, despite giving up the Raiders' lone touchdown pass from Derek Carr to Andre Holmes with 7 seconds left, won the game 23-13. | How many total points were scored? | b18436c7-11cc-4a7f-9b93-348da43993b2 | {
"number": "36",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [
""
],
"date": [
{
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
}
],
"spans": [
[]
],
"worker_id": [
""
],
"hit_id": [
""
]
} |
nfl_2704 | After suffering a disappointing loss to the previously winless Jaguars the week before, the Browns faced yet another winless opponent in the Oakland Raiders. Both teams struggled for much of the game, kicking a combined five field goals as the Browns held a 9-6 second half lead. At the end of the third quarter the Browns finally got the break they needed when S Joe Haden recovered a Darren McFadden fumble deep in Cleveland territory and returned it 34 yards. Four plays later, QB Brian Hoyer found WR Andrew Hawkins for a four-yard touchdown pass and a 16-6 lead. The Raiders would never recover and the Browns, despite giving up the Raiders' lone touchdown pass from Derek Carr to Andre Holmes with 7 seconds left, won the game 23-13. | Where there more touchdowns or field goals? | 2b849f52-fe28-4042-aed2-1e7be01c7678 | {
"number": "",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [
"field goals"
],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [
""
],
"date": [
{
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
}
],
"spans": [
[]
],
"worker_id": [
""
],
"hit_id": [
""
]
} |
nfl_2704 | After suffering a disappointing loss to the previously winless Jaguars the week before, the Browns faced yet another winless opponent in the Oakland Raiders. Both teams struggled for much of the game, kicking a combined five field goals as the Browns held a 9-6 second half lead. At the end of the third quarter the Browns finally got the break they needed when S Joe Haden recovered a Darren McFadden fumble deep in Cleveland territory and returned it 34 yards. Four plays later, QB Brian Hoyer found WR Andrew Hawkins for a four-yard touchdown pass and a 16-6 lead. The Raiders would never recover and the Browns, despite giving up the Raiders' lone touchdown pass from Derek Carr to Andre Holmes with 7 seconds left, won the game 23-13. | How many total points were scored in the game? | 22740d77-9d9f-494a-97e1-bcf9c46ea16e | {
"number": "36",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [
""
],
"date": [
{
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
}
],
"spans": [
[]
],
"worker_id": [
""
],
"hit_id": [
""
]
} |
nfl_933 | Coming off their home win over the Browns, the Ravens flew to Heinz Field for their first road game of the year, as they played a Week 4 MNF duel with the throwback-clad Pittsburgh Steelers. In the first quarter, Baltimore trailed early as Steelers kicker Jeff Reed got a 49-yard field goal. The Ravens responded with kicker Matt Stover getting a 33-yard field goal. Baltimore gained the lead in the second quarter as Stover kicked a 20-yard field goal, while rookie quarterback Joe Flacco completed his first career touchdown pass as he hooked up with TE Daniel Wilcox from 4 yards out. In the third quarter, Pittsburgh took the lead with quarterback Ben Roethlisberger completing a 38-yard TD pass to WR Santonio Holmes, along with LB James Harrison forcing a fumble from Flacco with LB LaMarr Woodley returning the fumble 7 yards for a touchdown. In the fourth quarter, the Steelers increased their lead with Reed getting a 19-yard field goal. Afterwards, the Ravens tied the game with RB Le'Ron McClain getting a 2-yard TD run. However, despite winning the coin toss in overtime, Baltimore was unable to gain ground. In the end, Pittsburgh sealed Baltimore's fate as Reed nailed the game-winning 46-yard field goal. | How many yards was the field goal Steelers kicker Jeff Reed? | 9bbb5e20-38a2-4940-9d32-e53ed4efef5e | {
"number": "49",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [
""
],
"date": [
{
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
}
],
"spans": [
[]
],
"worker_id": [
""
],
"hit_id": [
""
]
} |
nfl_933 | Coming off their home win over the Browns, the Ravens flew to Heinz Field for their first road game of the year, as they played a Week 4 MNF duel with the throwback-clad Pittsburgh Steelers. In the first quarter, Baltimore trailed early as Steelers kicker Jeff Reed got a 49-yard field goal. The Ravens responded with kicker Matt Stover getting a 33-yard field goal. Baltimore gained the lead in the second quarter as Stover kicked a 20-yard field goal, while rookie quarterback Joe Flacco completed his first career touchdown pass as he hooked up with TE Daniel Wilcox from 4 yards out. In the third quarter, Pittsburgh took the lead with quarterback Ben Roethlisberger completing a 38-yard TD pass to WR Santonio Holmes, along with LB James Harrison forcing a fumble from Flacco with LB LaMarr Woodley returning the fumble 7 yards for a touchdown. In the fourth quarter, the Steelers increased their lead with Reed getting a 19-yard field goal. Afterwards, the Ravens tied the game with RB Le'Ron McClain getting a 2-yard TD run. However, despite winning the coin toss in overtime, Baltimore was unable to gain ground. In the end, Pittsburgh sealed Baltimore's fate as Reed nailed the game-winning 46-yard field goal. | How many yards was the field goal Ravens kicker Matt Stover got? | b6b6904e-ed40-4e96-9fba-a49fd3fca58a | {
"number": "33",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [
""
],
"date": [
{
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
}
],
"spans": [
[]
],
"worker_id": [
""
],
"hit_id": [
""
]
} |
nfl_933 | Coming off their home win over the Browns, the Ravens flew to Heinz Field for their first road game of the year, as they played a Week 4 MNF duel with the throwback-clad Pittsburgh Steelers. In the first quarter, Baltimore trailed early as Steelers kicker Jeff Reed got a 49-yard field goal. The Ravens responded with kicker Matt Stover getting a 33-yard field goal. Baltimore gained the lead in the second quarter as Stover kicked a 20-yard field goal, while rookie quarterback Joe Flacco completed his first career touchdown pass as he hooked up with TE Daniel Wilcox from 4 yards out. In the third quarter, Pittsburgh took the lead with quarterback Ben Roethlisberger completing a 38-yard TD pass to WR Santonio Holmes, along with LB James Harrison forcing a fumble from Flacco with LB LaMarr Woodley returning the fumble 7 yards for a touchdown. In the fourth quarter, the Steelers increased their lead with Reed getting a 19-yard field goal. Afterwards, the Ravens tied the game with RB Le'Ron McClain getting a 2-yard TD run. However, despite winning the coin toss in overtime, Baltimore was unable to gain ground. In the end, Pittsburgh sealed Baltimore's fate as Reed nailed the game-winning 46-yard field goal. | How many yards out was the touchdown pass Joe Flacco completed to TE Daniel Wilcox? | 02b033d3-fe7a-40e6-8149-925d19c91dec | {
"number": "",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [
"4 yards out"
],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [
""
],
"date": [
{
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
}
],
"spans": [
[]
],
"worker_id": [
""
],
"hit_id": [
""
]
} |
nfl_933 | Coming off their home win over the Browns, the Ravens flew to Heinz Field for their first road game of the year, as they played a Week 4 MNF duel with the throwback-clad Pittsburgh Steelers. In the first quarter, Baltimore trailed early as Steelers kicker Jeff Reed got a 49-yard field goal. The Ravens responded with kicker Matt Stover getting a 33-yard field goal. Baltimore gained the lead in the second quarter as Stover kicked a 20-yard field goal, while rookie quarterback Joe Flacco completed his first career touchdown pass as he hooked up with TE Daniel Wilcox from 4 yards out. In the third quarter, Pittsburgh took the lead with quarterback Ben Roethlisberger completing a 38-yard TD pass to WR Santonio Holmes, along with LB James Harrison forcing a fumble from Flacco with LB LaMarr Woodley returning the fumble 7 yards for a touchdown. In the fourth quarter, the Steelers increased their lead with Reed getting a 19-yard field goal. Afterwards, the Ravens tied the game with RB Le'Ron McClain getting a 2-yard TD run. However, despite winning the coin toss in overtime, Baltimore was unable to gain ground. In the end, Pittsburgh sealed Baltimore's fate as Reed nailed the game-winning 46-yard field goal. | How many field goals were kicked in the first quarter? | e8d62ae8-995d-4c45-8574-b732e7574228 | {
"number": "2",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [
""
],
"date": [
{
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
}
],
"spans": [
[]
],
"worker_id": [
""
],
"hit_id": [
""
]
} |
nfl_933 | Coming off their home win over the Browns, the Ravens flew to Heinz Field for their first road game of the year, as they played a Week 4 MNF duel with the throwback-clad Pittsburgh Steelers. In the first quarter, Baltimore trailed early as Steelers kicker Jeff Reed got a 49-yard field goal. The Ravens responded with kicker Matt Stover getting a 33-yard field goal. Baltimore gained the lead in the second quarter as Stover kicked a 20-yard field goal, while rookie quarterback Joe Flacco completed his first career touchdown pass as he hooked up with TE Daniel Wilcox from 4 yards out. In the third quarter, Pittsburgh took the lead with quarterback Ben Roethlisberger completing a 38-yard TD pass to WR Santonio Holmes, along with LB James Harrison forcing a fumble from Flacco with LB LaMarr Woodley returning the fumble 7 yards for a touchdown. In the fourth quarter, the Steelers increased their lead with Reed getting a 19-yard field goal. Afterwards, the Ravens tied the game with RB Le'Ron McClain getting a 2-yard TD run. However, despite winning the coin toss in overtime, Baltimore was unable to gain ground. In the end, Pittsburgh sealed Baltimore's fate as Reed nailed the game-winning 46-yard field goal. | Which team scored in overtime? | 623172c9-aa81-42b8-89c3-4aa0f4b2a904 | {
"number": "",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [
"Pittsburgh"
],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [
""
],
"date": [
{
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
}
],
"spans": [
[]
],
"worker_id": [
""
],
"hit_id": [
""
]
} |
nfl_933 | Coming off their home win over the Browns, the Ravens flew to Heinz Field for their first road game of the year, as they played a Week 4 MNF duel with the throwback-clad Pittsburgh Steelers. In the first quarter, Baltimore trailed early as Steelers kicker Jeff Reed got a 49-yard field goal. The Ravens responded with kicker Matt Stover getting a 33-yard field goal. Baltimore gained the lead in the second quarter as Stover kicked a 20-yard field goal, while rookie quarterback Joe Flacco completed his first career touchdown pass as he hooked up with TE Daniel Wilcox from 4 yards out. In the third quarter, Pittsburgh took the lead with quarterback Ben Roethlisberger completing a 38-yard TD pass to WR Santonio Holmes, along with LB James Harrison forcing a fumble from Flacco with LB LaMarr Woodley returning the fumble 7 yards for a touchdown. In the fourth quarter, the Steelers increased their lead with Reed getting a 19-yard field goal. Afterwards, the Ravens tied the game with RB Le'Ron McClain getting a 2-yard TD run. However, despite winning the coin toss in overtime, Baltimore was unable to gain ground. In the end, Pittsburgh sealed Baltimore's fate as Reed nailed the game-winning 46-yard field goal. | How many touchdown passes were thrown by both teams? | bd7e356c-2dca-414d-adc7-8c5395cd4789 | {
"number": "2",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [
""
],
"date": [
{
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
}
],
"spans": [
[]
],
"worker_id": [
""
],
"hit_id": [
""
]
} |
nfl_933 | Coming off their home win over the Browns, the Ravens flew to Heinz Field for their first road game of the year, as they played a Week 4 MNF duel with the throwback-clad Pittsburgh Steelers. In the first quarter, Baltimore trailed early as Steelers kicker Jeff Reed got a 49-yard field goal. The Ravens responded with kicker Matt Stover getting a 33-yard field goal. Baltimore gained the lead in the second quarter as Stover kicked a 20-yard field goal, while rookie quarterback Joe Flacco completed his first career touchdown pass as he hooked up with TE Daniel Wilcox from 4 yards out. In the third quarter, Pittsburgh took the lead with quarterback Ben Roethlisberger completing a 38-yard TD pass to WR Santonio Holmes, along with LB James Harrison forcing a fumble from Flacco with LB LaMarr Woodley returning the fumble 7 yards for a touchdown. In the fourth quarter, the Steelers increased their lead with Reed getting a 19-yard field goal. Afterwards, the Ravens tied the game with RB Le'Ron McClain getting a 2-yard TD run. However, despite winning the coin toss in overtime, Baltimore was unable to gain ground. In the end, Pittsburgh sealed Baltimore's fate as Reed nailed the game-winning 46-yard field goal. | Who scored more points, Baltimore or Pittsburgh? | 9cea8106-e783-481a-82aa-766378871b9d | {
"number": "",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [
"Pittsburgh"
],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [
""
],
"date": [
{
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
}
],
"spans": [
[]
],
"worker_id": [
""
],
"hit_id": [
""
]
} |
nfl_933 | Coming off their home win over the Browns, the Ravens flew to Heinz Field for their first road game of the year, as they played a Week 4 MNF duel with the throwback-clad Pittsburgh Steelers. In the first quarter, Baltimore trailed early as Steelers kicker Jeff Reed got a 49-yard field goal. The Ravens responded with kicker Matt Stover getting a 33-yard field goal. Baltimore gained the lead in the second quarter as Stover kicked a 20-yard field goal, while rookie quarterback Joe Flacco completed his first career touchdown pass as he hooked up with TE Daniel Wilcox from 4 yards out. In the third quarter, Pittsburgh took the lead with quarterback Ben Roethlisberger completing a 38-yard TD pass to WR Santonio Holmes, along with LB James Harrison forcing a fumble from Flacco with LB LaMarr Woodley returning the fumble 7 yards for a touchdown. In the fourth quarter, the Steelers increased their lead with Reed getting a 19-yard field goal. Afterwards, the Ravens tied the game with RB Le'Ron McClain getting a 2-yard TD run. However, despite winning the coin toss in overtime, Baltimore was unable to gain ground. In the end, Pittsburgh sealed Baltimore's fate as Reed nailed the game-winning 46-yard field goal. | Which quarterback fumbled the ball? | 15ca9ca3-5689-4016-99f2-b40918a70cca | {
"number": "",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [
"Joe Flacco"
],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [
""
],
"date": [
{
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
}
],
"spans": [
[]
],
"worker_id": [
""
],
"hit_id": [
""
]
} |
Subsets and Splits
No saved queries yet
Save your SQL queries to embed, download, and access them later. Queries will appear here once saved.