section_id
stringlengths
5
12
passage
stringlengths
103
9.68k
question
stringlengths
4
388
query_id
stringlengths
36
36
answer
dict
validated_answers
sequence
history_2461
In recent decades, the literacy rate of Rajasthan has increased significantly. In 1991, the states literacy rate was only 38.55% (54.99% male and 20.44% female). In 2001, the literacy rate increased to 60.41% (75.70% male and 43.85% female). This was the highest leap in the percentage of literacy recorded in India (the rise in female literacy being 23%). At the Census 2011, Rajasthan had a literacy rate of 67.06% (80.51% male and 52.66% female). Although Rajasthans literacy rate is below the national average of 74.04% and although its female literacy rate is the lowest in the country, the state has been praised for its efforts and achievements in raising literacy rates.
How many percentage points did the male literacy rate increase between 1991 and 2011?
bbfcaa24-7539-4d33-a207-5a6d65c69cee
{ "number": "25.52", "date": { "day": "", "month": "", "year": "" }, "spans": [], "worker_id": "", "hit_id": "" }
{ "number": [], "date": [], "spans": [], "worker_id": [], "hit_id": [] }
history_2461
In recent decades, the literacy rate of Rajasthan has increased significantly. In 1991, the states literacy rate was only 38.55% (54.99% male and 20.44% female). In 2001, the literacy rate increased to 60.41% (75.70% male and 43.85% female). This was the highest leap in the percentage of literacy recorded in India (the rise in female literacy being 23%). At the Census 2011, Rajasthan had a literacy rate of 67.06% (80.51% male and 52.66% female). Although Rajasthans literacy rate is below the national average of 74.04% and although its female literacy rate is the lowest in the country, the state has been praised for its efforts and achievements in raising literacy rates.
How many percentage points higher was the Rajasthan literacy rate than the national average in 2011?
6c99d96c-680e-4983-9fc3-3a5c23ebfc95
{ "number": "6.98", "date": { "day": "", "month": "", "year": "" }, "spans": [], "worker_id": "", "hit_id": "" }
{ "number": [], "date": [], "spans": [], "worker_id": [], "hit_id": [] }
nfl_1351
Following a close loss to the Colts the prior week, the much-hated Steelers came to town for a rematch of last year's AFC Championship Game. Steelers starting QB Ben Roethlisberger, who suffered a concussion in the previous week's overtime loss to the Chiefs did not start, and was the designated 3rd (emergency) quarterback. Backup Charlie Batch also was hurt in that game, which left 2nd-year QB Dennis Dixon, who previously had one pass in his NFL career, to start. The Steelers received the opening kickoff, but went three-and-out. On the ensuing possession, the Ravens drove down the field with ease, capping off their drive with a touchdown run by Willis McGahee. In the second quarter, Dixon hit WR Santonio Holmes on a play-action pass for a 33-yard TD, tying the game. The Ravens answered on the following drive, with a 52-yard strike from Joe Flacco to Mark Clayton, setting up a 10-yard touchdown pass to Derrick Mason. In the third quarter, on the Ravens opening possession, Mark Clayton made a 9-yard reception but fumbled the ball. The ball was kicked 20 yards towards the Steelers endzone by a Pittsburgh player, but recovered by Tyrone Carter. The Steelers drove, but were held to a field goal by Jeff Reed. Later in the 4th quarter, Joe Flacco was sacked by Lawrence Timmons and fumbled the ball, recovered by the Steelers near midfield. The drive resulted in a 24-yard run on a QB option by Dixon, giving the Steelers their first lead of the night. On the Ravens next possession, things were looking bad when the offense was facing a 3rd and 22 with around 3 minutes left. Joe Flacco completed a pass to Derrick Mason for 17 yards, leaving John Harbaugh with a critical decision. Harbaugh opted to go for it, and Joe Flacco found Ray Rice for a 44-yard reception, setting the Ravens up inside the Steeler 10-yard line with less than 2 minutes left. Billy Cundiff tied the game with a 24-yard field goal. On the following Steeler possession, Dennis Dixon was nearly intercepted by Lardarius Webb. The Steelers were forced to punt, giving the ball back to the Ravens with about 1:30 left in the game. A very good punt return into Steeler territory by Chris Carr was wiped off by a block in the back. Despite the setback, the Ravens managed to drive to the Steeler 40-yard line, where their drive stalled. On 3rd and 9 with 25 seconds left, Joe Flacco was sacked and fumbled, but the ball was recovered by Ben Grubbs. With the clock counting inside 10 seconds left and no timeouts, the field goal team managed to get into formation, and get the kick off. The 56 yard attempt by Billy Cundiff was dead center, but about 2 yards short. In overtime, the Steelers won the toss and got the ball, but were forced to punt. The Ravens, also forced to punt deep in their own territory, gave the ball to Pittsburgh around the Steeler 40-yard line. On a 3rd and 5, Dennis Dixon threw an interception to LB Paul Kruger, who returned the ball 26 yards to the Steeler 28-yard line. Already in field goal range, the Ravens ran the ball down to the Pittsburgh 11-yard line where Billy Cundiff made a 29-yard field goal to win the game. With the win, both teams' records is 6-5. The Ravens hold the final wild card seed in the AFC due to the head-to-head tiebreaker over Pittsburgh.
How many touchdowns did the Ravens score in the first quarter?
f1795d73-7abb-4c3d-9ea8-8db7a93fbe52
{ "number": "1", "date": { "day": "", "month": "", "year": "" }, "spans": [], "worker_id": "", "hit_id": "" }
{ "number": [], "date": [], "spans": [], "worker_id": [], "hit_id": [] }
nfl_1351
Following a close loss to the Colts the prior week, the much-hated Steelers came to town for a rematch of last year's AFC Championship Game. Steelers starting QB Ben Roethlisberger, who suffered a concussion in the previous week's overtime loss to the Chiefs did not start, and was the designated 3rd (emergency) quarterback. Backup Charlie Batch also was hurt in that game, which left 2nd-year QB Dennis Dixon, who previously had one pass in his NFL career, to start. The Steelers received the opening kickoff, but went three-and-out. On the ensuing possession, the Ravens drove down the field with ease, capping off their drive with a touchdown run by Willis McGahee. In the second quarter, Dixon hit WR Santonio Holmes on a play-action pass for a 33-yard TD, tying the game. The Ravens answered on the following drive, with a 52-yard strike from Joe Flacco to Mark Clayton, setting up a 10-yard touchdown pass to Derrick Mason. In the third quarter, on the Ravens opening possession, Mark Clayton made a 9-yard reception but fumbled the ball. The ball was kicked 20 yards towards the Steelers endzone by a Pittsburgh player, but recovered by Tyrone Carter. The Steelers drove, but were held to a field goal by Jeff Reed. Later in the 4th quarter, Joe Flacco was sacked by Lawrence Timmons and fumbled the ball, recovered by the Steelers near midfield. The drive resulted in a 24-yard run on a QB option by Dixon, giving the Steelers their first lead of the night. On the Ravens next possession, things were looking bad when the offense was facing a 3rd and 22 with around 3 minutes left. Joe Flacco completed a pass to Derrick Mason for 17 yards, leaving John Harbaugh with a critical decision. Harbaugh opted to go for it, and Joe Flacco found Ray Rice for a 44-yard reception, setting the Ravens up inside the Steeler 10-yard line with less than 2 minutes left. Billy Cundiff tied the game with a 24-yard field goal. On the following Steeler possession, Dennis Dixon was nearly intercepted by Lardarius Webb. The Steelers were forced to punt, giving the ball back to the Ravens with about 1:30 left in the game. A very good punt return into Steeler territory by Chris Carr was wiped off by a block in the back. Despite the setback, the Ravens managed to drive to the Steeler 40-yard line, where their drive stalled. On 3rd and 9 with 25 seconds left, Joe Flacco was sacked and fumbled, but the ball was recovered by Ben Grubbs. With the clock counting inside 10 seconds left and no timeouts, the field goal team managed to get into formation, and get the kick off. The 56 yard attempt by Billy Cundiff was dead center, but about 2 yards short. In overtime, the Steelers won the toss and got the ball, but were forced to punt. The Ravens, also forced to punt deep in their own territory, gave the ball to Pittsburgh around the Steeler 40-yard line. On a 3rd and 5, Dennis Dixon threw an interception to LB Paul Kruger, who returned the ball 26 yards to the Steeler 28-yard line. Already in field goal range, the Ravens ran the ball down to the Pittsburgh 11-yard line where Billy Cundiff made a 29-yard field goal to win the game. With the win, both teams' records is 6-5. The Ravens hold the final wild card seed in the AFC due to the head-to-head tiebreaker over Pittsburgh.
How many yards was the game winning field goal?
73036c32-9458-40fc-b801-598a96919300
{ "number": "29", "date": { "day": "", "month": "", "year": "" }, "spans": [], "worker_id": "", "hit_id": "" }
{ "number": [], "date": [], "spans": [], "worker_id": [], "hit_id": [] }
history_2584
According to the 2011 census Russian citizens are the most numerous foreigners - 11 991, followed by 8 444 EU citizens (UK- 2 605, Greece - 1 253, Germany- 848, Poland - 819 and Italy - 456), citizens of Ukraine - 3 064, Republic of Macedonia - 1 091, Moldova - 893 and Serbia - 569. 22.8% of them are from Asia, mostly from Turkey. Those with dual Bulgarian and other citizenship were 22 152, or 0.3% of the population. Of them persons with Bulgarian and Russian citizenship were 5 257 (23.7%), followed by persons with Bulgarian and Turkish citizenship - 4 282 (19.3%), Bulgarian and citizenship of the USA- 1 725 (7.8%). There are at least 17,527 Refugees of the Syrian Civil War with applications in Bulgaria. In 2001-2015 185,447 people applied for Bulgarian citizenship and 116,222 were provided with. 113,647 were granted on grounds of proven Bulgarian ancestry, including 59,968 Republic of Macedonia citizens. 29,218 were Moldovan citizens, 5930 Ukrainians, 5374 Serbians, 5194 Russians, 3840 Israeli, 2192 Albanians, 692 Turks and others. In 2016, 12,880 foreigners were naturalized, including 6196 Macedonians.
Which make up the most foreigners, Russian citizens or the EU?
a440968e-f178-42ab-a5a3-d49c087c6765
{ "number": "", "date": { "day": "", "month": "", "year": "" }, "spans": [ "Russian citizens" ], "worker_id": "", "hit_id": "" }
{ "number": [], "date": [], "spans": [], "worker_id": [], "hit_id": [] }
history_2584
According to the 2011 census Russian citizens are the most numerous foreigners - 11 991, followed by 8 444 EU citizens (UK- 2 605, Greece - 1 253, Germany- 848, Poland - 819 and Italy - 456), citizens of Ukraine - 3 064, Republic of Macedonia - 1 091, Moldova - 893 and Serbia - 569. 22.8% of them are from Asia, mostly from Turkey. Those with dual Bulgarian and other citizenship were 22 152, or 0.3% of the population. Of them persons with Bulgarian and Russian citizenship were 5 257 (23.7%), followed by persons with Bulgarian and Turkish citizenship - 4 282 (19.3%), Bulgarian and citizenship of the USA- 1 725 (7.8%). There are at least 17,527 Refugees of the Syrian Civil War with applications in Bulgaria. In 2001-2015 185,447 people applied for Bulgarian citizenship and 116,222 were provided with. 113,647 were granted on grounds of proven Bulgarian ancestry, including 59,968 Republic of Macedonia citizens. 29,218 were Moldovan citizens, 5930 Ukrainians, 5374 Serbians, 5194 Russians, 3840 Israeli, 2192 Albanians, 692 Turks and others. In 2016, 12,880 foreigners were naturalized, including 6196 Macedonians.
How many more Poland foreigners are there than Italians?
ee71a474-7408-4d29-b6f1-9f6a893b5153
{ "number": "363", "date": { "day": "", "month": "", "year": "" }, "spans": [], "worker_id": "", "hit_id": "" }
{ "number": [], "date": [], "spans": [], "worker_id": [], "hit_id": [] }
history_2584
According to the 2011 census Russian citizens are the most numerous foreigners - 11 991, followed by 8 444 EU citizens (UK- 2 605, Greece - 1 253, Germany- 848, Poland - 819 and Italy - 456), citizens of Ukraine - 3 064, Republic of Macedonia - 1 091, Moldova - 893 and Serbia - 569. 22.8% of them are from Asia, mostly from Turkey. Those with dual Bulgarian and other citizenship were 22 152, or 0.3% of the population. Of them persons with Bulgarian and Russian citizenship were 5 257 (23.7%), followed by persons with Bulgarian and Turkish citizenship - 4 282 (19.3%), Bulgarian and citizenship of the USA- 1 725 (7.8%). There are at least 17,527 Refugees of the Syrian Civil War with applications in Bulgaria. In 2001-2015 185,447 people applied for Bulgarian citizenship and 116,222 were provided with. 113,647 were granted on grounds of proven Bulgarian ancestry, including 59,968 Republic of Macedonia citizens. 29,218 were Moldovan citizens, 5930 Ukrainians, 5374 Serbians, 5194 Russians, 3840 Israeli, 2192 Albanians, 692 Turks and others. In 2016, 12,880 foreigners were naturalized, including 6196 Macedonians.
How many years accumulated to 185,447 people applying for Bulgarian citizenship?
03b5f1fd-4627-4c12-876a-3a016ec71f53
{ "number": "14", "date": { "day": "", "month": "", "year": "" }, "spans": [], "worker_id": "", "hit_id": "" }
{ "number": [], "date": [], "spans": [], "worker_id": [], "hit_id": [] }
history_2584
According to the 2011 census Russian citizens are the most numerous foreigners - 11 991, followed by 8 444 EU citizens (UK- 2 605, Greece - 1 253, Germany- 848, Poland - 819 and Italy - 456), citizens of Ukraine - 3 064, Republic of Macedonia - 1 091, Moldova - 893 and Serbia - 569. 22.8% of them are from Asia, mostly from Turkey. Those with dual Bulgarian and other citizenship were 22 152, or 0.3% of the population. Of them persons with Bulgarian and Russian citizenship were 5 257 (23.7%), followed by persons with Bulgarian and Turkish citizenship - 4 282 (19.3%), Bulgarian and citizenship of the USA- 1 725 (7.8%). There are at least 17,527 Refugees of the Syrian Civil War with applications in Bulgaria. In 2001-2015 185,447 people applied for Bulgarian citizenship and 116,222 were provided with. 113,647 were granted on grounds of proven Bulgarian ancestry, including 59,968 Republic of Macedonia citizens. 29,218 were Moldovan citizens, 5930 Ukrainians, 5374 Serbians, 5194 Russians, 3840 Israeli, 2192 Albanians, 692 Turks and others. In 2016, 12,880 foreigners were naturalized, including 6196 Macedonians.
How many of the 185447 refugees who applied for Bulgarian citizenship were granted citizenship?
a45669bf-b16a-4454-a0d6-394534a4035b
{ "number": "69225", "date": { "day": "", "month": "", "year": "" }, "spans": [], "worker_id": "", "hit_id": "" }
{ "number": [], "date": [], "spans": [], "worker_id": [], "hit_id": [] }
history_2584
According to the 2011 census Russian citizens are the most numerous foreigners - 11 991, followed by 8 444 EU citizens (UK- 2 605, Greece - 1 253, Germany- 848, Poland - 819 and Italy - 456), citizens of Ukraine - 3 064, Republic of Macedonia - 1 091, Moldova - 893 and Serbia - 569. 22.8% of them are from Asia, mostly from Turkey. Those with dual Bulgarian and other citizenship were 22 152, or 0.3% of the population. Of them persons with Bulgarian and Russian citizenship were 5 257 (23.7%), followed by persons with Bulgarian and Turkish citizenship - 4 282 (19.3%), Bulgarian and citizenship of the USA- 1 725 (7.8%). There are at least 17,527 Refugees of the Syrian Civil War with applications in Bulgaria. In 2001-2015 185,447 people applied for Bulgarian citizenship and 116,222 were provided with. 113,647 were granted on grounds of proven Bulgarian ancestry, including 59,968 Republic of Macedonia citizens. 29,218 were Moldovan citizens, 5930 Ukrainians, 5374 Serbians, 5194 Russians, 3840 Israeli, 2192 Albanians, 692 Turks and others. In 2016, 12,880 foreigners were naturalized, including 6196 Macedonians.
How many more Ukrainians than Serbian with proven Bulgarian ancestry?
2cab4ed8-517a-467d-889e-538a301e22c2
{ "number": "736", "date": { "day": "", "month": "", "year": "" }, "spans": [], "worker_id": "", "hit_id": "" }
{ "number": [], "date": [], "spans": [], "worker_id": [], "hit_id": [] }
history_2584
According to the 2011 census Russian citizens are the most numerous foreigners - 11 991, followed by 8 444 EU citizens (UK- 2 605, Greece - 1 253, Germany- 848, Poland - 819 and Italy - 456), citizens of Ukraine - 3 064, Republic of Macedonia - 1 091, Moldova - 893 and Serbia - 569. 22.8% of them are from Asia, mostly from Turkey. Those with dual Bulgarian and other citizenship were 22 152, or 0.3% of the population. Of them persons with Bulgarian and Russian citizenship were 5 257 (23.7%), followed by persons with Bulgarian and Turkish citizenship - 4 282 (19.3%), Bulgarian and citizenship of the USA- 1 725 (7.8%). There are at least 17,527 Refugees of the Syrian Civil War with applications in Bulgaria. In 2001-2015 185,447 people applied for Bulgarian citizenship and 116,222 were provided with. 113,647 were granted on grounds of proven Bulgarian ancestry, including 59,968 Republic of Macedonia citizens. 29,218 were Moldovan citizens, 5930 Ukrainians, 5374 Serbians, 5194 Russians, 3840 Israeli, 2192 Albanians, 692 Turks and others. In 2016, 12,880 foreigners were naturalized, including 6196 Macedonians.
How many more Albanians than Turks in the Russian census?
fef11ced-7649-4d18-97cf-d73639bfa121
{ "number": "7386", "date": { "day": "", "month": "", "year": "" }, "spans": [], "worker_id": "", "hit_id": "" }
{ "number": [], "date": [], "spans": [], "worker_id": [], "hit_id": [] }
history_2584
According to the 2011 census Russian citizens are the most numerous foreigners - 11 991, followed by 8 444 EU citizens (UK- 2 605, Greece - 1 253, Germany- 848, Poland - 819 and Italy - 456), citizens of Ukraine - 3 064, Republic of Macedonia - 1 091, Moldova - 893 and Serbia - 569. 22.8% of them are from Asia, mostly from Turkey. Those with dual Bulgarian and other citizenship were 22 152, or 0.3% of the population. Of them persons with Bulgarian and Russian citizenship were 5 257 (23.7%), followed by persons with Bulgarian and Turkish citizenship - 4 282 (19.3%), Bulgarian and citizenship of the USA- 1 725 (7.8%). There are at least 17,527 Refugees of the Syrian Civil War with applications in Bulgaria. In 2001-2015 185,447 people applied for Bulgarian citizenship and 116,222 were provided with. 113,647 were granted on grounds of proven Bulgarian ancestry, including 59,968 Republic of Macedonia citizens. 29,218 were Moldovan citizens, 5930 Ukrainians, 5374 Serbians, 5194 Russians, 3840 Israeli, 2192 Albanians, 692 Turks and others. In 2016, 12,880 foreigners were naturalized, including 6196 Macedonians.
Which countries have over 800 EU citizens?
39498b0d-8f7e-4496-8fdd-573749940fdd
{ "number": "", "date": { "day": "", "month": "", "year": "" }, "spans": [ "Poland", "Germany", "Greece", "UK" ], "worker_id": "", "hit_id": "" }
{ "number": [], "date": [], "spans": [], "worker_id": [], "hit_id": [] }
history_2584
According to the 2011 census Russian citizens are the most numerous foreigners - 11 991, followed by 8 444 EU citizens (UK- 2 605, Greece - 1 253, Germany- 848, Poland - 819 and Italy - 456), citizens of Ukraine - 3 064, Republic of Macedonia - 1 091, Moldova - 893 and Serbia - 569. 22.8% of them are from Asia, mostly from Turkey. Those with dual Bulgarian and other citizenship were 22 152, or 0.3% of the population. Of them persons with Bulgarian and Russian citizenship were 5 257 (23.7%), followed by persons with Bulgarian and Turkish citizenship - 4 282 (19.3%), Bulgarian and citizenship of the USA- 1 725 (7.8%). There are at least 17,527 Refugees of the Syrian Civil War with applications in Bulgaria. In 2001-2015 185,447 people applied for Bulgarian citizenship and 116,222 were provided with. 113,647 were granted on grounds of proven Bulgarian ancestry, including 59,968 Republic of Macedonia citizens. 29,218 were Moldovan citizens, 5930 Ukrainians, 5374 Serbians, 5194 Russians, 3840 Israeli, 2192 Albanians, 692 Turks and others. In 2016, 12,880 foreigners were naturalized, including 6196 Macedonians.
Which citizenship did not have more than a population of 5000?
5e6ee8a4-a328-4d28-a910-c8517e1098d1
{ "number": "", "date": { "day": "", "month": "", "year": "" }, "spans": [ "Bulgarian and Turkish citizenship", "Bulgarian and citizenship of the USA" ], "worker_id": "", "hit_id": "" }
{ "number": [], "date": [], "spans": [], "worker_id": [], "hit_id": [] }
history_2584
According to the 2011 census Russian citizens are the most numerous foreigners - 11 991, followed by 8 444 EU citizens (UK- 2 605, Greece - 1 253, Germany- 848, Poland - 819 and Italy - 456), citizens of Ukraine - 3 064, Republic of Macedonia - 1 091, Moldova - 893 and Serbia - 569. 22.8% of them are from Asia, mostly from Turkey. Those with dual Bulgarian and other citizenship were 22 152, or 0.3% of the population. Of them persons with Bulgarian and Russian citizenship were 5 257 (23.7%), followed by persons with Bulgarian and Turkish citizenship - 4 282 (19.3%), Bulgarian and citizenship of the USA- 1 725 (7.8%). There are at least 17,527 Refugees of the Syrian Civil War with applications in Bulgaria. In 2001-2015 185,447 people applied for Bulgarian citizenship and 116,222 were provided with. 113,647 were granted on grounds of proven Bulgarian ancestry, including 59,968 Republic of Macedonia citizens. 29,218 were Moldovan citizens, 5930 Ukrainians, 5374 Serbians, 5194 Russians, 3840 Israeli, 2192 Albanians, 692 Turks and others. In 2016, 12,880 foreigners were naturalized, including 6196 Macedonians.
How many more people had Bulgarian and Russian citizenship than Bulgarian and Turkish citizenship?
cadcbac4-b38d-47d9-b668-7f99ac7b857f
{ "number": "975", "date": { "day": "", "month": "", "year": "" }, "spans": [], "worker_id": "", "hit_id": "" }
{ "number": [], "date": [], "spans": [], "worker_id": [], "hit_id": [] }
history_2584
According to the 2011 census Russian citizens are the most numerous foreigners - 11 991, followed by 8 444 EU citizens (UK- 2 605, Greece - 1 253, Germany- 848, Poland - 819 and Italy - 456), citizens of Ukraine - 3 064, Republic of Macedonia - 1 091, Moldova - 893 and Serbia - 569. 22.8% of them are from Asia, mostly from Turkey. Those with dual Bulgarian and other citizenship were 22 152, or 0.3% of the population. Of them persons with Bulgarian and Russian citizenship were 5 257 (23.7%), followed by persons with Bulgarian and Turkish citizenship - 4 282 (19.3%), Bulgarian and citizenship of the USA- 1 725 (7.8%). There are at least 17,527 Refugees of the Syrian Civil War with applications in Bulgaria. In 2001-2015 185,447 people applied for Bulgarian citizenship and 116,222 were provided with. 113,647 were granted on grounds of proven Bulgarian ancestry, including 59,968 Republic of Macedonia citizens. 29,218 were Moldovan citizens, 5930 Ukrainians, 5374 Serbians, 5194 Russians, 3840 Israeli, 2192 Albanians, 692 Turks and others. In 2016, 12,880 foreigners were naturalized, including 6196 Macedonians.
How many years total were 69225 not granted Bulgarian Citizenship?
30863a3d-9a7b-4bc2-a340-ca047686534c
{ "number": "14", "date": { "day": "", "month": "", "year": "" }, "spans": [], "worker_id": "", "hit_id": "" }
{ "number": [], "date": [], "spans": [], "worker_id": [], "hit_id": [] }
history_2584
According to the 2011 census Russian citizens are the most numerous foreigners - 11 991, followed by 8 444 EU citizens (UK- 2 605, Greece - 1 253, Germany- 848, Poland - 819 and Italy - 456), citizens of Ukraine - 3 064, Republic of Macedonia - 1 091, Moldova - 893 and Serbia - 569. 22.8% of them are from Asia, mostly from Turkey. Those with dual Bulgarian and other citizenship were 22 152, or 0.3% of the population. Of them persons with Bulgarian and Russian citizenship were 5 257 (23.7%), followed by persons with Bulgarian and Turkish citizenship - 4 282 (19.3%), Bulgarian and citizenship of the USA- 1 725 (7.8%). There are at least 17,527 Refugees of the Syrian Civil War with applications in Bulgaria. In 2001-2015 185,447 people applied for Bulgarian citizenship and 116,222 were provided with. 113,647 were granted on grounds of proven Bulgarian ancestry, including 59,968 Republic of Macedonia citizens. 29,218 were Moldovan citizens, 5930 Ukrainians, 5374 Serbians, 5194 Russians, 3840 Israeli, 2192 Albanians, 692 Turks and others. In 2016, 12,880 foreigners were naturalized, including 6196 Macedonians.
Which citizens were there less than 5000 who belonged to Bulgarian ancestry?
695db80d-0985-4141-b6f0-fbfe23c8b81f
{ "number": "", "date": { "day": "", "month": "", "year": "" }, "spans": [ "Israeli", "Albanians", "Turks and others" ], "worker_id": "", "hit_id": "" }
{ "number": [], "date": [], "spans": [], "worker_id": [], "hit_id": [] }
history_2584
According to the 2011 census Russian citizens are the most numerous foreigners - 11 991, followed by 8 444 EU citizens (UK- 2 605, Greece - 1 253, Germany- 848, Poland - 819 and Italy - 456), citizens of Ukraine - 3 064, Republic of Macedonia - 1 091, Moldova - 893 and Serbia - 569. 22.8% of them are from Asia, mostly from Turkey. Those with dual Bulgarian and other citizenship were 22 152, or 0.3% of the population. Of them persons with Bulgarian and Russian citizenship were 5 257 (23.7%), followed by persons with Bulgarian and Turkish citizenship - 4 282 (19.3%), Bulgarian and citizenship of the USA- 1 725 (7.8%). There are at least 17,527 Refugees of the Syrian Civil War with applications in Bulgaria. In 2001-2015 185,447 people applied for Bulgarian citizenship and 116,222 were provided with. 113,647 were granted on grounds of proven Bulgarian ancestry, including 59,968 Republic of Macedonia citizens. 29,218 were Moldovan citizens, 5930 Ukrainians, 5374 Serbians, 5194 Russians, 3840 Israeli, 2192 Albanians, 692 Turks and others. In 2016, 12,880 foreigners were naturalized, including 6196 Macedonians.
How many more Moldovan citizens were of Bulgarian ancestry than Serbian citizens with Bulgarian ancestry?
0d34cd1c-b0f7-44a6-9c72-2cde98ffaa3b
{ "number": "23884", "date": { "day": "", "month": "", "year": "" }, "spans": [], "worker_id": "", "hit_id": "" }
{ "number": [], "date": [], "spans": [], "worker_id": [], "hit_id": [] }
history_2584
According to the 2011 census Russian citizens are the most numerous foreigners - 11 991, followed by 8 444 EU citizens (UK- 2 605, Greece - 1 253, Germany- 848, Poland - 819 and Italy - 456), citizens of Ukraine - 3 064, Republic of Macedonia - 1 091, Moldova - 893 and Serbia - 569. 22.8% of them are from Asia, mostly from Turkey. Those with dual Bulgarian and other citizenship were 22 152, or 0.3% of the population. Of them persons with Bulgarian and Russian citizenship were 5 257 (23.7%), followed by persons with Bulgarian and Turkish citizenship - 4 282 (19.3%), Bulgarian and citizenship of the USA- 1 725 (7.8%). There are at least 17,527 Refugees of the Syrian Civil War with applications in Bulgaria. In 2001-2015 185,447 people applied for Bulgarian citizenship and 116,222 were provided with. 113,647 were granted on grounds of proven Bulgarian ancestry, including 59,968 Republic of Macedonia citizens. 29,218 were Moldovan citizens, 5930 Ukrainians, 5374 Serbians, 5194 Russians, 3840 Israeli, 2192 Albanians, 692 Turks and others. In 2016, 12,880 foreigners were naturalized, including 6196 Macedonians.
Which citizens had more Bulgarian ancestry citizens than Ukrainians, Serbians and Russians combined?
ec366eaa-9815-4003-8ff8-b4c38760e6e1
{ "number": "", "date": { "day": "", "month": "", "year": "" }, "spans": [ "Moldovan citizens", "Republic of Macedonia citizens" ], "worker_id": "", "hit_id": "" }
{ "number": [], "date": [], "spans": [], "worker_id": [], "hit_id": [] }
history_2584
According to the 2011 census Russian citizens are the most numerous foreigners - 11 991, followed by 8 444 EU citizens (UK- 2 605, Greece - 1 253, Germany- 848, Poland - 819 and Italy - 456), citizens of Ukraine - 3 064, Republic of Macedonia - 1 091, Moldova - 893 and Serbia - 569. 22.8% of them are from Asia, mostly from Turkey. Those with dual Bulgarian and other citizenship were 22 152, or 0.3% of the population. Of them persons with Bulgarian and Russian citizenship were 5 257 (23.7%), followed by persons with Bulgarian and Turkish citizenship - 4 282 (19.3%), Bulgarian and citizenship of the USA- 1 725 (7.8%). There are at least 17,527 Refugees of the Syrian Civil War with applications in Bulgaria. In 2001-2015 185,447 people applied for Bulgarian citizenship and 116,222 were provided with. 113,647 were granted on grounds of proven Bulgarian ancestry, including 59,968 Republic of Macedonia citizens. 29,218 were Moldovan citizens, 5930 Ukrainians, 5374 Serbians, 5194 Russians, 3840 Israeli, 2192 Albanians, 692 Turks and others. In 2016, 12,880 foreigners were naturalized, including 6196 Macedonians.
How many of the foreigners that were naturalized in 2016 were not Macedonians?
81ea96ca-e60a-4fd5-b353-47797c93e318
{ "number": "6684", "date": { "day": "", "month": "", "year": "" }, "spans": [], "worker_id": "", "hit_id": "" }
{ "number": [], "date": [], "spans": [], "worker_id": [], "hit_id": [] }
history_2584
According to the 2011 census Russian citizens are the most numerous foreigners - 11 991, followed by 8 444 EU citizens (UK- 2 605, Greece - 1 253, Germany- 848, Poland - 819 and Italy - 456), citizens of Ukraine - 3 064, Republic of Macedonia - 1 091, Moldova - 893 and Serbia - 569. 22.8% of them are from Asia, mostly from Turkey. Those with dual Bulgarian and other citizenship were 22 152, or 0.3% of the population. Of them persons with Bulgarian and Russian citizenship were 5 257 (23.7%), followed by persons with Bulgarian and Turkish citizenship - 4 282 (19.3%), Bulgarian and citizenship of the USA- 1 725 (7.8%). There are at least 17,527 Refugees of the Syrian Civil War with applications in Bulgaria. In 2001-2015 185,447 people applied for Bulgarian citizenship and 116,222 were provided with. 113,647 were granted on grounds of proven Bulgarian ancestry, including 59,968 Republic of Macedonia citizens. 29,218 were Moldovan citizens, 5930 Ukrainians, 5374 Serbians, 5194 Russians, 3840 Israeli, 2192 Albanians, 692 Turks and others. In 2016, 12,880 foreigners were naturalized, including 6196 Macedonians.
How many more citizens from Moldova were there than from Serbia?
1aec18e0-0e80-4163-a8b2-731c4cf3915c
{ "number": "324", "date": { "day": "", "month": "", "year": "" }, "spans": [], "worker_id": "", "hit_id": "" }
{ "number": [], "date": [], "spans": [], "worker_id": [], "hit_id": [] }
history_2584
According to the 2011 census Russian citizens are the most numerous foreigners - 11 991, followed by 8 444 EU citizens (UK- 2 605, Greece - 1 253, Germany- 848, Poland - 819 and Italy - 456), citizens of Ukraine - 3 064, Republic of Macedonia - 1 091, Moldova - 893 and Serbia - 569. 22.8% of them are from Asia, mostly from Turkey. Those with dual Bulgarian and other citizenship were 22 152, or 0.3% of the population. Of them persons with Bulgarian and Russian citizenship were 5 257 (23.7%), followed by persons with Bulgarian and Turkish citizenship - 4 282 (19.3%), Bulgarian and citizenship of the USA- 1 725 (7.8%). There are at least 17,527 Refugees of the Syrian Civil War with applications in Bulgaria. In 2001-2015 185,447 people applied for Bulgarian citizenship and 116,222 were provided with. 113,647 were granted on grounds of proven Bulgarian ancestry, including 59,968 Republic of Macedonia citizens. 29,218 were Moldovan citizens, 5930 Ukrainians, 5374 Serbians, 5194 Russians, 3840 Israeli, 2192 Albanians, 692 Turks and others. In 2016, 12,880 foreigners were naturalized, including 6196 Macedonians.
How many people who applied for Bulgarian citizenship were not granted the citizenship?
90e84597-ec27-453b-a091-282dd6ce6bdb
{ "number": "69225", "date": { "day": "", "month": "", "year": "" }, "spans": [], "worker_id": "", "hit_id": "" }
{ "number": [], "date": [], "spans": [], "worker_id": [], "hit_id": [] }
history_2584
According to the 2011 census Russian citizens are the most numerous foreigners - 11 991, followed by 8 444 EU citizens (UK- 2 605, Greece - 1 253, Germany- 848, Poland - 819 and Italy - 456), citizens of Ukraine - 3 064, Republic of Macedonia - 1 091, Moldova - 893 and Serbia - 569. 22.8% of them are from Asia, mostly from Turkey. Those with dual Bulgarian and other citizenship were 22 152, or 0.3% of the population. Of them persons with Bulgarian and Russian citizenship were 5 257 (23.7%), followed by persons with Bulgarian and Turkish citizenship - 4 282 (19.3%), Bulgarian and citizenship of the USA- 1 725 (7.8%). There are at least 17,527 Refugees of the Syrian Civil War with applications in Bulgaria. In 2001-2015 185,447 people applied for Bulgarian citizenship and 116,222 were provided with. 113,647 were granted on grounds of proven Bulgarian ancestry, including 59,968 Republic of Macedonia citizens. 29,218 were Moldovan citizens, 5930 Ukrainians, 5374 Serbians, 5194 Russians, 3840 Israeli, 2192 Albanians, 692 Turks and others. In 2016, 12,880 foreigners were naturalized, including 6196 Macedonians.
Which groups of people from Bulgarian ancestry had more than 3000 citizens whom were granted Bulgarian citizenship?
41570332-7a63-440f-bebd-4f9adabe5c2a
{ "number": "", "date": { "day": "", "month": "", "year": "" }, "spans": [ "Israeli", "Russians", "Serbians", "Ukrainians", "Moldovan", "Republic of Macedonia" ], "worker_id": "", "hit_id": "" }
{ "number": [], "date": [], "spans": [], "worker_id": [], "hit_id": [] }
history_2319
As a result of continued decline in the traditional Gaelic heartlands, today no Civil parishes in Scotland in Scotland has a proportion of Gaelic speakers greater than 65% (the highest value is in Barvas, Isle of Lewis, with 64.1%). In addition, no civil parish on mainland Scotland has a proportion of Gaelic speakers greater than 20% (the highest value is in Ardnamurchan, Highland (council area), with 19.3%). Out of a total of 871 civil parishes in Scotland, the proportion of Gaelic speakers exceeds 50% in 7 parishes, exceeds 25% in 14 parishes, and exceeds 10% in 35 parishes. Decline in traditional areas has recently been balanced by growth in the Scottish Lowlands. Between the 2001 and 2011 censuses, the number of Gaelic speakers rose in nineteen of the countrys 32 council areas. The largest absolute gains were in Aberdeenshire (council area) (+526), North Lanarkshire (+305), City of Aberdeen (+216), and East Ayrshire (+208). The largest relative gains were in Aberdeenshire (+0.19%), East Ayrshire (+0.18%), Moray (+0.16%), and Orkney Islands (+0.13%).
How many percent of people in Barvas do not speak Gaelic?
b06839e1-559c-4cee-8fde-5fc565b2157d
{ "number": "35.9", "date": { "day": "", "month": "", "year": "" }, "spans": [], "worker_id": "", "hit_id": "" }
{ "number": [], "date": [], "spans": [], "worker_id": [], "hit_id": [] }
history_2319
As a result of continued decline in the traditional Gaelic heartlands, today no Civil parishes in Scotland in Scotland has a proportion of Gaelic speakers greater than 65% (the highest value is in Barvas, Isle of Lewis, with 64.1%). In addition, no civil parish on mainland Scotland has a proportion of Gaelic speakers greater than 20% (the highest value is in Ardnamurchan, Highland (council area), with 19.3%). Out of a total of 871 civil parishes in Scotland, the proportion of Gaelic speakers exceeds 50% in 7 parishes, exceeds 25% in 14 parishes, and exceeds 10% in 35 parishes. Decline in traditional areas has recently been balanced by growth in the Scottish Lowlands. Between the 2001 and 2011 censuses, the number of Gaelic speakers rose in nineteen of the countrys 32 council areas. The largest absolute gains were in Aberdeenshire (council area) (+526), North Lanarkshire (+305), City of Aberdeen (+216), and East Ayrshire (+208). The largest relative gains were in Aberdeenshire (+0.19%), East Ayrshire (+0.18%), Moray (+0.16%), and Orkney Islands (+0.13%).
Which area has a greater percentage of people that speak Gaelic, Barvas or Ardnamurchan?
3cd0a472-682e-437a-b9f8-4e7bb9ba844a
{ "number": "", "date": { "day": "", "month": "", "year": "" }, "spans": [ "Barvas" ], "worker_id": "", "hit_id": "" }
{ "number": [], "date": [], "spans": [], "worker_id": [], "hit_id": [] }
history_2319
As a result of continued decline in the traditional Gaelic heartlands, today no Civil parishes in Scotland in Scotland has a proportion of Gaelic speakers greater than 65% (the highest value is in Barvas, Isle of Lewis, with 64.1%). In addition, no civil parish on mainland Scotland has a proportion of Gaelic speakers greater than 20% (the highest value is in Ardnamurchan, Highland (council area), with 19.3%). Out of a total of 871 civil parishes in Scotland, the proportion of Gaelic speakers exceeds 50% in 7 parishes, exceeds 25% in 14 parishes, and exceeds 10% in 35 parishes. Decline in traditional areas has recently been balanced by growth in the Scottish Lowlands. Between the 2001 and 2011 censuses, the number of Gaelic speakers rose in nineteen of the countrys 32 council areas. The largest absolute gains were in Aberdeenshire (council area) (+526), North Lanarkshire (+305), City of Aberdeen (+216), and East Ayrshire (+208). The largest relative gains were in Aberdeenshire (+0.19%), East Ayrshire (+0.18%), Moray (+0.16%), and Orkney Islands (+0.13%).
Which area saw a larger gain in Gaelic speakers, North Lanarkshire or East Ayrshire?
363edfa5-8cac-423f-a892-06e7196d33c5
{ "number": "", "date": { "day": "", "month": "", "year": "" }, "spans": [ "North Lanarkshire" ], "worker_id": "", "hit_id": "" }
{ "number": [], "date": [], "spans": [], "worker_id": [], "hit_id": [] }
history_2319
As a result of continued decline in the traditional Gaelic heartlands, today no Civil parishes in Scotland in Scotland has a proportion of Gaelic speakers greater than 65% (the highest value is in Barvas, Isle of Lewis, with 64.1%). In addition, no civil parish on mainland Scotland has a proportion of Gaelic speakers greater than 20% (the highest value is in Ardnamurchan, Highland (council area), with 19.3%). Out of a total of 871 civil parishes in Scotland, the proportion of Gaelic speakers exceeds 50% in 7 parishes, exceeds 25% in 14 parishes, and exceeds 10% in 35 parishes. Decline in traditional areas has recently been balanced by growth in the Scottish Lowlands. Between the 2001 and 2011 censuses, the number of Gaelic speakers rose in nineteen of the countrys 32 council areas. The largest absolute gains were in Aberdeenshire (council area) (+526), North Lanarkshire (+305), City of Aberdeen (+216), and East Ayrshire (+208). The largest relative gains were in Aberdeenshire (+0.19%), East Ayrshire (+0.18%), Moray (+0.16%), and Orkney Islands (+0.13%).
How many more did Aberdeenshire gain compared to East Ayshire?
f69f9042-a847-47cd-8249-8eea78b11dd2
{ "number": "318", "date": { "day": "", "month": "", "year": "" }, "spans": [], "worker_id": "", "hit_id": "" }
{ "number": [], "date": [], "spans": [], "worker_id": [], "hit_id": [] }
history_2319
As a result of continued decline in the traditional Gaelic heartlands, today no Civil parishes in Scotland in Scotland has a proportion of Gaelic speakers greater than 65% (the highest value is in Barvas, Isle of Lewis, with 64.1%). In addition, no civil parish on mainland Scotland has a proportion of Gaelic speakers greater than 20% (the highest value is in Ardnamurchan, Highland (council area), with 19.3%). Out of a total of 871 civil parishes in Scotland, the proportion of Gaelic speakers exceeds 50% in 7 parishes, exceeds 25% in 14 parishes, and exceeds 10% in 35 parishes. Decline in traditional areas has recently been balanced by growth in the Scottish Lowlands. Between the 2001 and 2011 censuses, the number of Gaelic speakers rose in nineteen of the countrys 32 council areas. The largest absolute gains were in Aberdeenshire (council area) (+526), North Lanarkshire (+305), City of Aberdeen (+216), and East Ayrshire (+208). The largest relative gains were in Aberdeenshire (+0.19%), East Ayrshire (+0.18%), Moray (+0.16%), and Orkney Islands (+0.13%).
Which areas saw gains between 200 and 300?
cc8565e4-f58f-4f80-a5ea-dac5c6d90003
{ "number": "", "date": { "day": "", "month": "", "year": "" }, "spans": [ "City of Aberdeen", "East Ayrshire" ], "worker_id": "", "hit_id": "" }
{ "number": [], "date": [], "spans": [], "worker_id": [], "hit_id": [] }
history_2319
As a result of continued decline in the traditional Gaelic heartlands, today no Civil parishes in Scotland in Scotland has a proportion of Gaelic speakers greater than 65% (the highest value is in Barvas, Isle of Lewis, with 64.1%). In addition, no civil parish on mainland Scotland has a proportion of Gaelic speakers greater than 20% (the highest value is in Ardnamurchan, Highland (council area), with 19.3%). Out of a total of 871 civil parishes in Scotland, the proportion of Gaelic speakers exceeds 50% in 7 parishes, exceeds 25% in 14 parishes, and exceeds 10% in 35 parishes. Decline in traditional areas has recently been balanced by growth in the Scottish Lowlands. Between the 2001 and 2011 censuses, the number of Gaelic speakers rose in nineteen of the countrys 32 council areas. The largest absolute gains were in Aberdeenshire (council area) (+526), North Lanarkshire (+305), City of Aberdeen (+216), and East Ayrshire (+208). The largest relative gains were in Aberdeenshire (+0.19%), East Ayrshire (+0.18%), Moray (+0.16%), and Orkney Islands (+0.13%).
Which areas saw gains of 300 or more?
0c0e7b0b-fe13-4439-9de4-ead31f5bce67
{ "number": "", "date": { "day": "", "month": "", "year": "" }, "spans": [ "Aberdeenshire", "North Lanarkshire" ], "worker_id": "", "hit_id": "" }
{ "number": [], "date": [], "spans": [], "worker_id": [], "hit_id": [] }
history_2319
As a result of continued decline in the traditional Gaelic heartlands, today no Civil parishes in Scotland in Scotland has a proportion of Gaelic speakers greater than 65% (the highest value is in Barvas, Isle of Lewis, with 64.1%). In addition, no civil parish on mainland Scotland has a proportion of Gaelic speakers greater than 20% (the highest value is in Ardnamurchan, Highland (council area), with 19.3%). Out of a total of 871 civil parishes in Scotland, the proportion of Gaelic speakers exceeds 50% in 7 parishes, exceeds 25% in 14 parishes, and exceeds 10% in 35 parishes. Decline in traditional areas has recently been balanced by growth in the Scottish Lowlands. Between the 2001 and 2011 censuses, the number of Gaelic speakers rose in nineteen of the countrys 32 council areas. The largest absolute gains were in Aberdeenshire (council area) (+526), North Lanarkshire (+305), City of Aberdeen (+216), and East Ayrshire (+208). The largest relative gains were in Aberdeenshire (+0.19%), East Ayrshire (+0.18%), Moray (+0.16%), and Orkney Islands (+0.13%).
Which area saw the third highest relative gain?
51f7a1dc-8acf-4cb7-8def-5ef95bcd2229
{ "number": "", "date": { "day": "", "month": "", "year": "" }, "spans": [ "Moray" ], "worker_id": "", "hit_id": "" }
{ "number": [], "date": [], "spans": [], "worker_id": [], "hit_id": [] }
history_2319
As a result of continued decline in the traditional Gaelic heartlands, today no Civil parishes in Scotland in Scotland has a proportion of Gaelic speakers greater than 65% (the highest value is in Barvas, Isle of Lewis, with 64.1%). In addition, no civil parish on mainland Scotland has a proportion of Gaelic speakers greater than 20% (the highest value is in Ardnamurchan, Highland (council area), with 19.3%). Out of a total of 871 civil parishes in Scotland, the proportion of Gaelic speakers exceeds 50% in 7 parishes, exceeds 25% in 14 parishes, and exceeds 10% in 35 parishes. Decline in traditional areas has recently been balanced by growth in the Scottish Lowlands. Between the 2001 and 2011 censuses, the number of Gaelic speakers rose in nineteen of the countrys 32 council areas. The largest absolute gains were in Aberdeenshire (council area) (+526), North Lanarkshire (+305), City of Aberdeen (+216), and East Ayrshire (+208). The largest relative gains were in Aberdeenshire (+0.19%), East Ayrshire (+0.18%), Moray (+0.16%), and Orkney Islands (+0.13%).
Between 2001 and 2011 how many areas did not see a rise in Gaelic speakers?
7f08210f-8ef6-4bfc-a4ec-ac13e103e7d6
{ "number": "13", "date": { "day": "", "month": "", "year": "" }, "spans": [], "worker_id": "", "hit_id": "" }
{ "number": [], "date": [], "spans": [], "worker_id": [], "hit_id": [] }
history_2319
As a result of continued decline in the traditional Gaelic heartlands, today no Civil parishes in Scotland in Scotland has a proportion of Gaelic speakers greater than 65% (the highest value is in Barvas, Isle of Lewis, with 64.1%). In addition, no civil parish on mainland Scotland has a proportion of Gaelic speakers greater than 20% (the highest value is in Ardnamurchan, Highland (council area), with 19.3%). Out of a total of 871 civil parishes in Scotland, the proportion of Gaelic speakers exceeds 50% in 7 parishes, exceeds 25% in 14 parishes, and exceeds 10% in 35 parishes. Decline in traditional areas has recently been balanced by growth in the Scottish Lowlands. Between the 2001 and 2011 censuses, the number of Gaelic speakers rose in nineteen of the countrys 32 council areas. The largest absolute gains were in Aberdeenshire (council area) (+526), North Lanarkshire (+305), City of Aberdeen (+216), and East Ayrshire (+208). The largest relative gains were in Aberdeenshire (+0.19%), East Ayrshire (+0.18%), Moray (+0.16%), and Orkney Islands (+0.13%).
How many of the civil parishes do not exceed more than 50% of Gaelic speakers?
23780cf7-3fb2-4f08-a01d-a66443776923
{ "number": "864", "date": { "day": "", "month": "", "year": "" }, "spans": [], "worker_id": "", "hit_id": "" }
{ "number": [], "date": [], "spans": [], "worker_id": [], "hit_id": [] }
history_2319
As a result of continued decline in the traditional Gaelic heartlands, today no Civil parishes in Scotland in Scotland has a proportion of Gaelic speakers greater than 65% (the highest value is in Barvas, Isle of Lewis, with 64.1%). In addition, no civil parish on mainland Scotland has a proportion of Gaelic speakers greater than 20% (the highest value is in Ardnamurchan, Highland (council area), with 19.3%). Out of a total of 871 civil parishes in Scotland, the proportion of Gaelic speakers exceeds 50% in 7 parishes, exceeds 25% in 14 parishes, and exceeds 10% in 35 parishes. Decline in traditional areas has recently been balanced by growth in the Scottish Lowlands. Between the 2001 and 2011 censuses, the number of Gaelic speakers rose in nineteen of the countrys 32 council areas. The largest absolute gains were in Aberdeenshire (council area) (+526), North Lanarkshire (+305), City of Aberdeen (+216), and East Ayrshire (+208). The largest relative gains were in Aberdeenshire (+0.19%), East Ayrshire (+0.18%), Moray (+0.16%), and Orkney Islands (+0.13%).
How many parishes total did not exceed more than 25%?
81b396e6-dd55-425e-8593-0b7bfbd5578f
{ "number": "49", "date": { "day": "", "month": "", "year": "" }, "spans": [], "worker_id": "", "hit_id": "" }
{ "number": [], "date": [], "spans": [], "worker_id": [], "hit_id": [] }
history_2319
As a result of continued decline in the traditional Gaelic heartlands, today no Civil parishes in Scotland in Scotland has a proportion of Gaelic speakers greater than 65% (the highest value is in Barvas, Isle of Lewis, with 64.1%). In addition, no civil parish on mainland Scotland has a proportion of Gaelic speakers greater than 20% (the highest value is in Ardnamurchan, Highland (council area), with 19.3%). Out of a total of 871 civil parishes in Scotland, the proportion of Gaelic speakers exceeds 50% in 7 parishes, exceeds 25% in 14 parishes, and exceeds 10% in 35 parishes. Decline in traditional areas has recently been balanced by growth in the Scottish Lowlands. Between the 2001 and 2011 censuses, the number of Gaelic speakers rose in nineteen of the countrys 32 council areas. The largest absolute gains were in Aberdeenshire (council area) (+526), North Lanarkshire (+305), City of Aberdeen (+216), and East Ayrshire (+208). The largest relative gains were in Aberdeenshire (+0.19%), East Ayrshire (+0.18%), Moray (+0.16%), and Orkney Islands (+0.13%).
Which areas saw over 200 gains in absolute gains but less than 300?
b762e113-ed94-4863-bab4-b93fe603586a
{ "number": "", "date": { "day": "", "month": "", "year": "" }, "spans": [ "City of Aberdeen", "East Ayrshire" ], "worker_id": "", "hit_id": "" }
{ "number": [], "date": [], "spans": [], "worker_id": [], "hit_id": [] }
history_2319
As a result of continued decline in the traditional Gaelic heartlands, today no Civil parishes in Scotland in Scotland has a proportion of Gaelic speakers greater than 65% (the highest value is in Barvas, Isle of Lewis, with 64.1%). In addition, no civil parish on mainland Scotland has a proportion of Gaelic speakers greater than 20% (the highest value is in Ardnamurchan, Highland (council area), with 19.3%). Out of a total of 871 civil parishes in Scotland, the proportion of Gaelic speakers exceeds 50% in 7 parishes, exceeds 25% in 14 parishes, and exceeds 10% in 35 parishes. Decline in traditional areas has recently been balanced by growth in the Scottish Lowlands. Between the 2001 and 2011 censuses, the number of Gaelic speakers rose in nineteen of the countrys 32 council areas. The largest absolute gains were in Aberdeenshire (council area) (+526), North Lanarkshire (+305), City of Aberdeen (+216), and East Ayrshire (+208). The largest relative gains were in Aberdeenshire (+0.19%), East Ayrshire (+0.18%), Moray (+0.16%), and Orkney Islands (+0.13%).
How many parishes in Scotland have more than half of their people who can speak Gaelic?
dd64533f-9cb7-4c42-a3a3-c624eee0a420
{ "number": "7", "date": { "day": "", "month": "", "year": "" }, "spans": [], "worker_id": "", "hit_id": "" }
{ "number": [], "date": [], "spans": [], "worker_id": [], "hit_id": [] }
history_2319
As a result of continued decline in the traditional Gaelic heartlands, today no Civil parishes in Scotland in Scotland has a proportion of Gaelic speakers greater than 65% (the highest value is in Barvas, Isle of Lewis, with 64.1%). In addition, no civil parish on mainland Scotland has a proportion of Gaelic speakers greater than 20% (the highest value is in Ardnamurchan, Highland (council area), with 19.3%). Out of a total of 871 civil parishes in Scotland, the proportion of Gaelic speakers exceeds 50% in 7 parishes, exceeds 25% in 14 parishes, and exceeds 10% in 35 parishes. Decline in traditional areas has recently been balanced by growth in the Scottish Lowlands. Between the 2001 and 2011 censuses, the number of Gaelic speakers rose in nineteen of the countrys 32 council areas. The largest absolute gains were in Aberdeenshire (council area) (+526), North Lanarkshire (+305), City of Aberdeen (+216), and East Ayrshire (+208). The largest relative gains were in Aberdeenshire (+0.19%), East Ayrshire (+0.18%), Moray (+0.16%), and Orkney Islands (+0.13%).
In the Lowlands did the number of Gaelic speakers increase or decrease between 2001 and 2011?
96a69ed6-8f06-4a0d-88ba-b136f4e087c5
{ "number": "", "date": { "day": "", "month": "", "year": "" }, "spans": [ "increase" ], "worker_id": "", "hit_id": "" }
{ "number": [], "date": [], "spans": [], "worker_id": [], "hit_id": [] }
history_2319
As a result of continued decline in the traditional Gaelic heartlands, today no Civil parishes in Scotland in Scotland has a proportion of Gaelic speakers greater than 65% (the highest value is in Barvas, Isle of Lewis, with 64.1%). In addition, no civil parish on mainland Scotland has a proportion of Gaelic speakers greater than 20% (the highest value is in Ardnamurchan, Highland (council area), with 19.3%). Out of a total of 871 civil parishes in Scotland, the proportion of Gaelic speakers exceeds 50% in 7 parishes, exceeds 25% in 14 parishes, and exceeds 10% in 35 parishes. Decline in traditional areas has recently been balanced by growth in the Scottish Lowlands. Between the 2001 and 2011 censuses, the number of Gaelic speakers rose in nineteen of the countrys 32 council areas. The largest absolute gains were in Aberdeenshire (council area) (+526), North Lanarkshire (+305), City of Aberdeen (+216), and East Ayrshire (+208). The largest relative gains were in Aberdeenshire (+0.19%), East Ayrshire (+0.18%), Moray (+0.16%), and Orkney Islands (+0.13%).
Which areas saw an absolute gain of more than 300?
7b1b5034-cb30-491f-b4a7-cb4b0e0766ca
{ "number": "", "date": { "day": "", "month": "", "year": "" }, "spans": [ "Aberdeenshire", "North Lanarkshire" ], "worker_id": "", "hit_id": "" }
{ "number": [], "date": [], "spans": [], "worker_id": [], "hit_id": [] }
history_2319
As a result of continued decline in the traditional Gaelic heartlands, today no Civil parishes in Scotland in Scotland has a proportion of Gaelic speakers greater than 65% (the highest value is in Barvas, Isle of Lewis, with 64.1%). In addition, no civil parish on mainland Scotland has a proportion of Gaelic speakers greater than 20% (the highest value is in Ardnamurchan, Highland (council area), with 19.3%). Out of a total of 871 civil parishes in Scotland, the proportion of Gaelic speakers exceeds 50% in 7 parishes, exceeds 25% in 14 parishes, and exceeds 10% in 35 parishes. Decline in traditional areas has recently been balanced by growth in the Scottish Lowlands. Between the 2001 and 2011 censuses, the number of Gaelic speakers rose in nineteen of the countrys 32 council areas. The largest absolute gains were in Aberdeenshire (council area) (+526), North Lanarkshire (+305), City of Aberdeen (+216), and East Ayrshire (+208). The largest relative gains were in Aberdeenshire (+0.19%), East Ayrshire (+0.18%), Moray (+0.16%), and Orkney Islands (+0.13%).
Which areas saw absolute gains between 200 and 300?
41a90543-161a-421e-b258-481e4cd115e5
{ "number": "", "date": { "day": "", "month": "", "year": "" }, "spans": [ "City of Aberdeen", "East Ayrshire" ], "worker_id": "", "hit_id": "" }
{ "number": [], "date": [], "spans": [], "worker_id": [], "hit_id": [] }
history_2319
As a result of continued decline in the traditional Gaelic heartlands, today no Civil parishes in Scotland in Scotland has a proportion of Gaelic speakers greater than 65% (the highest value is in Barvas, Isle of Lewis, with 64.1%). In addition, no civil parish on mainland Scotland has a proportion of Gaelic speakers greater than 20% (the highest value is in Ardnamurchan, Highland (council area), with 19.3%). Out of a total of 871 civil parishes in Scotland, the proportion of Gaelic speakers exceeds 50% in 7 parishes, exceeds 25% in 14 parishes, and exceeds 10% in 35 parishes. Decline in traditional areas has recently been balanced by growth in the Scottish Lowlands. Between the 2001 and 2011 censuses, the number of Gaelic speakers rose in nineteen of the countrys 32 council areas. The largest absolute gains were in Aberdeenshire (council area) (+526), North Lanarkshire (+305), City of Aberdeen (+216), and East Ayrshire (+208). The largest relative gains were in Aberdeenshire (+0.19%), East Ayrshire (+0.18%), Moray (+0.16%), and Orkney Islands (+0.13%).
Which area had the largest relative gain?
0ef93cd7-5eb7-4b99-b07a-26944bb63221
{ "number": "", "date": { "day": "", "month": "", "year": "" }, "spans": [ "Aberdeenshire" ], "worker_id": "", "hit_id": "" }
{ "number": [], "date": [], "spans": [], "worker_id": [], "hit_id": [] }
history_2319
As a result of continued decline in the traditional Gaelic heartlands, today no Civil parishes in Scotland in Scotland has a proportion of Gaelic speakers greater than 65% (the highest value is in Barvas, Isle of Lewis, with 64.1%). In addition, no civil parish on mainland Scotland has a proportion of Gaelic speakers greater than 20% (the highest value is in Ardnamurchan, Highland (council area), with 19.3%). Out of a total of 871 civil parishes in Scotland, the proportion of Gaelic speakers exceeds 50% in 7 parishes, exceeds 25% in 14 parishes, and exceeds 10% in 35 parishes. Decline in traditional areas has recently been balanced by growth in the Scottish Lowlands. Between the 2001 and 2011 censuses, the number of Gaelic speakers rose in nineteen of the countrys 32 council areas. The largest absolute gains were in Aberdeenshire (council area) (+526), North Lanarkshire (+305), City of Aberdeen (+216), and East Ayrshire (+208). The largest relative gains were in Aberdeenshire (+0.19%), East Ayrshire (+0.18%), Moray (+0.16%), and Orkney Islands (+0.13%).
How many parishes exceed 25% than 50% in Scotland?
2cba87d3-f4a9-486d-a920-e5d006999152
{ "number": "7", "date": { "day": "", "month": "", "year": "" }, "spans": [], "worker_id": "", "hit_id": "" }
{ "number": [], "date": [], "spans": [], "worker_id": [], "hit_id": [] }
history_2319
As a result of continued decline in the traditional Gaelic heartlands, today no Civil parishes in Scotland in Scotland has a proportion of Gaelic speakers greater than 65% (the highest value is in Barvas, Isle of Lewis, with 64.1%). In addition, no civil parish on mainland Scotland has a proportion of Gaelic speakers greater than 20% (the highest value is in Ardnamurchan, Highland (council area), with 19.3%). Out of a total of 871 civil parishes in Scotland, the proportion of Gaelic speakers exceeds 50% in 7 parishes, exceeds 25% in 14 parishes, and exceeds 10% in 35 parishes. Decline in traditional areas has recently been balanced by growth in the Scottish Lowlands. Between the 2001 and 2011 censuses, the number of Gaelic speakers rose in nineteen of the countrys 32 council areas. The largest absolute gains were in Aberdeenshire (council area) (+526), North Lanarkshire (+305), City of Aberdeen (+216), and East Ayrshire (+208). The largest relative gains were in Aberdeenshire (+0.19%), East Ayrshire (+0.18%), Moray (+0.16%), and Orkney Islands (+0.13%).
What city had the smallest gains in Scotland: Orkney Islands or Moray?
9edf25a6-0cd8-4e84-a250-b8053aa57db0
{ "number": "", "date": { "day": "", "month": "", "year": "" }, "spans": [ "Orkney Islands" ], "worker_id": "", "hit_id": "" }
{ "number": [], "date": [], "spans": [], "worker_id": [], "hit_id": [] }
history_2468
According to the 2012 census, 48.4% were Christianity, among whom 26.7% were Protestants (including 11.18% Pentecostal, 11.16% Moravian Church, and 4.4% of various other Protestant denominations) and 21.6% were Roman Catholics. Hindus formed the second-largest religious group in Suriname, comprising 22.3% of the population, the third largest proportion of any country in the Western Hemisphere after Guyana and Trinidad and Tobago, both of which also have large proportions of Indians. Almost all practitioners of Hinduism are found among the Indo-Surinamese population. Muslims constitute 13.9% of the population, which is proportionally the largest in the Americas, and are found mostly among those of Javanese and to a lesser degree those of Indian descent. Other religious groups include Winti (1.8%), an Afro-American religion practiced mostly by those of Maroon ancestry; Javanism (0.8%), a syncretic faith found among some Javanese Surinamese; and various indigenous folk traditions that are often incorporated into one of the larger religions (usually Christianity). In the 2012 census, 7.5% of the population declared they had "no religion", while a further 3.2% left the question unanswered.
How many percentage of the religious groups were only Christians than Protestants?
ec75d1f4-c0f4-4d09-9c25-2cfc7bf3299f
{ "number": "21.7", "date": { "day": "", "month": "", "year": "" }, "spans": [], "worker_id": "", "hit_id": "" }
{ "number": [], "date": [], "spans": [], "worker_id": [], "hit_id": [] }
history_2468
According to the 2012 census, 48.4% were Christianity, among whom 26.7% were Protestants (including 11.18% Pentecostal, 11.16% Moravian Church, and 4.4% of various other Protestant denominations) and 21.6% were Roman Catholics. Hindus formed the second-largest religious group in Suriname, comprising 22.3% of the population, the third largest proportion of any country in the Western Hemisphere after Guyana and Trinidad and Tobago, both of which also have large proportions of Indians. Almost all practitioners of Hinduism are found among the Indo-Surinamese population. Muslims constitute 13.9% of the population, which is proportionally the largest in the Americas, and are found mostly among those of Javanese and to a lesser degree those of Indian descent. Other religious groups include Winti (1.8%), an Afro-American religion practiced mostly by those of Maroon ancestry; Javanism (0.8%), a syncretic faith found among some Javanese Surinamese; and various indigenous folk traditions that are often incorporated into one of the larger religions (usually Christianity). In the 2012 census, 7.5% of the population declared they had "no religion", while a further 3.2% left the question unanswered.
How many more percentages in 2012 had no religion than left the question unanswered?
e7535f6f-cbed-42aa-a505-e5995051b620
{ "number": "4.3", "date": { "day": "", "month": "", "year": "" }, "spans": [], "worker_id": "", "hit_id": "" }
{ "number": [], "date": [], "spans": [], "worker_id": [], "hit_id": [] }
history_2468
According to the 2012 census, 48.4% were Christianity, among whom 26.7% were Protestants (including 11.18% Pentecostal, 11.16% Moravian Church, and 4.4% of various other Protestant denominations) and 21.6% were Roman Catholics. Hindus formed the second-largest religious group in Suriname, comprising 22.3% of the population, the third largest proportion of any country in the Western Hemisphere after Guyana and Trinidad and Tobago, both of which also have large proportions of Indians. Almost all practitioners of Hinduism are found among the Indo-Surinamese population. Muslims constitute 13.9% of the population, which is proportionally the largest in the Americas, and are found mostly among those of Javanese and to a lesser degree those of Indian descent. Other religious groups include Winti (1.8%), an Afro-American religion practiced mostly by those of Maroon ancestry; Javanism (0.8%), a syncretic faith found among some Javanese Surinamese; and various indigenous folk traditions that are often incorporated into one of the larger religions (usually Christianity). In the 2012 census, 7.5% of the population declared they had "no religion", while a further 3.2% left the question unanswered.
Which religious group has a higher percentage in Suriname, Hindus or Roman Catholics?
927b9170-2443-472d-8446-bb48b1012cd5
{ "number": "", "date": { "day": "", "month": "", "year": "" }, "spans": [ "Hindus" ], "worker_id": "", "hit_id": "" }
{ "number": [], "date": [], "spans": [], "worker_id": [], "hit_id": [] }
history_2468
According to the 2012 census, 48.4% were Christianity, among whom 26.7% were Protestants (including 11.18% Pentecostal, 11.16% Moravian Church, and 4.4% of various other Protestant denominations) and 21.6% were Roman Catholics. Hindus formed the second-largest religious group in Suriname, comprising 22.3% of the population, the third largest proportion of any country in the Western Hemisphere after Guyana and Trinidad and Tobago, both of which also have large proportions of Indians. Almost all practitioners of Hinduism are found among the Indo-Surinamese population. Muslims constitute 13.9% of the population, which is proportionally the largest in the Americas, and are found mostly among those of Javanese and to a lesser degree those of Indian descent. Other religious groups include Winti (1.8%), an Afro-American religion practiced mostly by those of Maroon ancestry; Javanism (0.8%), a syncretic faith found among some Javanese Surinamese; and various indigenous folk traditions that are often incorporated into one of the larger religions (usually Christianity). In the 2012 census, 7.5% of the population declared they had "no religion", while a further 3.2% left the question unanswered.
How many more percentage more Pentecostal than Moravian Church?
ebed7221-0ae0-433e-9ff6-ba19123f97f8
{ "number": "0.02", "date": { "day": "", "month": "", "year": "" }, "spans": [], "worker_id": "", "hit_id": "" }
{ "number": [], "date": [], "spans": [], "worker_id": [], "hit_id": [] }
history_2468
According to the 2012 census, 48.4% were Christianity, among whom 26.7% were Protestants (including 11.18% Pentecostal, 11.16% Moravian Church, and 4.4% of various other Protestant denominations) and 21.6% were Roman Catholics. Hindus formed the second-largest religious group in Suriname, comprising 22.3% of the population, the third largest proportion of any country in the Western Hemisphere after Guyana and Trinidad and Tobago, both of which also have large proportions of Indians. Almost all practitioners of Hinduism are found among the Indo-Surinamese population. Muslims constitute 13.9% of the population, which is proportionally the largest in the Americas, and are found mostly among those of Javanese and to a lesser degree those of Indian descent. Other religious groups include Winti (1.8%), an Afro-American religion practiced mostly by those of Maroon ancestry; Javanism (0.8%), a syncretic faith found among some Javanese Surinamese; and various indigenous folk traditions that are often incorporated into one of the larger religions (usually Christianity). In the 2012 census, 7.5% of the population declared they had "no religion", while a further 3.2% left the question unanswered.
Which religious group has more population, Muslims or Protestants?
e66be7d5-8ada-48ec-840e-829944231021
{ "number": "", "date": { "day": "", "month": "", "year": "" }, "spans": [ "Protestants" ], "worker_id": "", "hit_id": "" }
{ "number": [], "date": [], "spans": [], "worker_id": [], "hit_id": [] }
history_2468
According to the 2012 census, 48.4% were Christianity, among whom 26.7% were Protestants (including 11.18% Pentecostal, 11.16% Moravian Church, and 4.4% of various other Protestant denominations) and 21.6% were Roman Catholics. Hindus formed the second-largest religious group in Suriname, comprising 22.3% of the population, the third largest proportion of any country in the Western Hemisphere after Guyana and Trinidad and Tobago, both of which also have large proportions of Indians. Almost all practitioners of Hinduism are found among the Indo-Surinamese population. Muslims constitute 13.9% of the population, which is proportionally the largest in the Americas, and are found mostly among those of Javanese and to a lesser degree those of Indian descent. Other religious groups include Winti (1.8%), an Afro-American religion practiced mostly by those of Maroon ancestry; Javanism (0.8%), a syncretic faith found among some Javanese Surinamese; and various indigenous folk traditions that are often incorporated into one of the larger religions (usually Christianity). In the 2012 census, 7.5% of the population declared they had "no religion", while a further 3.2% left the question unanswered.
Which religious group had less population, Winti or Javanism?
3dddc058-46ac-4818-bc13-30d981bee4e8
{ "number": "", "date": { "day": "", "month": "", "year": "" }, "spans": [ "Javanism" ], "worker_id": "", "hit_id": "" }
{ "number": [], "date": [], "spans": [], "worker_id": [], "hit_id": [] }
nfl_3059
After a huge win against the Ravens in Baltimore, the Seahawks returned home to host the Cleveland Browns. Russell Wilson's streak continued, over the last five games he's thrown for 19 touchdowns and zero interceptions. Doug Baldwin over the last four games has compiled 10 touchdowns which has only been achieved one other time (Jerry Rice in 1987).With the injury of Thomas Rawls the week prior Derrick Coleman got the start at running back but Christine Michael took the majority of the carries. With the win, the Seahawks improved to 9-5 and clinched a playoff spot after winning five straight games. Furthermore, the Seahawks' all-time franchise regular season win-loss record improved to 314-312-0. This marks the first time ever in team history that the Seahawks have had an overall regular season win-loss record of at least two games above .500.
Who beta the Ravens in the week before this game?
83e06f4e-a24b-4d3c-9ce8-147a1318db14
{ "number": "", "date": { "day": "", "month": "", "year": "" }, "spans": [ "Seahawks" ], "worker_id": "", "hit_id": "" }
{ "number": [], "date": [], "spans": [], "worker_id": [], "hit_id": [] }
nfl_3059
After a huge win against the Ravens in Baltimore, the Seahawks returned home to host the Cleveland Browns. Russell Wilson's streak continued, over the last five games he's thrown for 19 touchdowns and zero interceptions. Doug Baldwin over the last four games has compiled 10 touchdowns which has only been achieved one other time (Jerry Rice in 1987).With the injury of Thomas Rawls the week prior Derrick Coleman got the start at running back but Christine Michael took the majority of the carries. With the win, the Seahawks improved to 9-5 and clinched a playoff spot after winning five straight games. Furthermore, the Seahawks' all-time franchise regular season win-loss record improved to 314-312-0. This marks the first time ever in team history that the Seahawks have had an overall regular season win-loss record of at least two games above .500.
Which two players have scored 10 touchdowns in four games?
20db85d9-a18a-45b3-8818-04f3da662c2f
{ "number": "", "date": { "day": "", "month": "", "year": "" }, "spans": [ "Doug Baldwin", "Jerry Rice" ], "worker_id": "", "hit_id": "" }
{ "number": [], "date": [], "spans": [], "worker_id": [], "hit_id": [] }
history_2574
With a population of 1.88 million in 2013, The Gambia List of countries by population. Its population density is 176.1 inhabitants per square kilometer (456.1 inhabitants per square mile). The overall List of countries by life expectancy is 64.1 years. The total fertility rate of 3.98 is one of the highest in the world. Since 1950, the United Nations (UN) estimated the birth rate exceeds the death rate. The Gambia Bureau of Statistics (GBOS) estimates the population of The Gambia is expected to reach 3.6 million in 20 years. The population of The Gambia has increased each census, starting with 315 thousand in 1963 to 1.8 million in 2013. The GBOS predicted the reason for the increase from 2003 to 2013 was more coverage in the latter census compared to the formers.
Which was higher in Gambia, the birth rate or the death rate?
d5a1fcae-de69-4130-8262-3d6eff0ad35d
{ "number": "", "date": { "day": "", "month": "", "year": "" }, "spans": [ "birth rate" ], "worker_id": "", "hit_id": "" }
{ "number": [], "date": [], "spans": [], "worker_id": [], "hit_id": [] }
history_2574
With a population of 1.88 million in 2013, The Gambia List of countries by population. Its population density is 176.1 inhabitants per square kilometer (456.1 inhabitants per square mile). The overall List of countries by life expectancy is 64.1 years. The total fertility rate of 3.98 is one of the highest in the world. Since 1950, the United Nations (UN) estimated the birth rate exceeds the death rate. The Gambia Bureau of Statistics (GBOS) estimates the population of The Gambia is expected to reach 3.6 million in 20 years. The population of The Gambia has increased each census, starting with 315 thousand in 1963 to 1.8 million in 2013. The GBOS predicted the reason for the increase from 2003 to 2013 was more coverage in the latter census compared to the formers.
Buy how many people did the population of The Gambia increase from 1963 to 2013?
8a34e259-9c8b-4a7f-930c-2469aaec64ed
{ "number": "1485000", "date": { "day": "", "month": "", "year": "" }, "spans": [], "worker_id": "", "hit_id": "" }
{ "number": [], "date": [], "spans": [], "worker_id": [], "hit_id": [] }
history_2574
With a population of 1.88 million in 2013, The Gambia List of countries by population. Its population density is 176.1 inhabitants per square kilometer (456.1 inhabitants per square mile). The overall List of countries by life expectancy is 64.1 years. The total fertility rate of 3.98 is one of the highest in the world. Since 1950, the United Nations (UN) estimated the birth rate exceeds the death rate. The Gambia Bureau of Statistics (GBOS) estimates the population of The Gambia is expected to reach 3.6 million in 20 years. The population of The Gambia has increased each census, starting with 315 thousand in 1963 to 1.8 million in 2013. The GBOS predicted the reason for the increase from 2003 to 2013 was more coverage in the latter census compared to the formers.
How many people was the population increased by in 2013 from 1963?
64b681b8-f377-465d-9987-3bb47c2459dc
{ "number": "1485000", "date": { "day": "", "month": "", "year": "" }, "spans": [], "worker_id": "", "hit_id": "" }
{ "number": [], "date": [], "spans": [], "worker_id": [], "hit_id": [] }
history_2303
At the 2012 census, 59.5% of jobs in the Paris Region were in market services (12.0% in wholesale and retail trade, 9.7% in professional, scientific, and technical services, 6.5% in information and communication, 6.5% in transportation and warehousing, 5.9% in finance and insurance, 5.8% in administrative and support services, 4.6% in accommodation and food services, and 8.5% in various other market services), 26.9% in non-market services (10.4% in human health and social work activities, 9.6% in public administration and defence, and 6.9% in education), 8.2% in manufacturing and utilities (6.6% in manufacturing and 1.5% in utilities), 5.2% in construction, and 0.2% in agriculture.
Which industry were there more people working in the Paris Region in 2012, finance and insurance or transportation and warehousing?
e0e0c4d3-9871-45b2-b6d4-1888fd361200
{ "number": "", "date": { "day": "", "month": "", "year": "" }, "spans": [ "transportation and warehousing" ], "worker_id": "", "hit_id": "" }
{ "number": [], "date": [], "spans": [], "worker_id": [], "hit_id": [] }
history_2303
At the 2012 census, 59.5% of jobs in the Paris Region were in market services (12.0% in wholesale and retail trade, 9.7% in professional, scientific, and technical services, 6.5% in information and communication, 6.5% in transportation and warehousing, 5.9% in finance and insurance, 5.8% in administrative and support services, 4.6% in accommodation and food services, and 8.5% in various other market services), 26.9% in non-market services (10.4% in human health and social work activities, 9.6% in public administration and defence, and 6.9% in education), 8.2% in manufacturing and utilities (6.6% in manufacturing and 1.5% in utilities), 5.2% in construction, and 0.2% in agriculture.
What industry made up the largest percentage?
26668267-324e-43f6-af3c-74eb3c6acf08
{ "number": "", "date": { "day": "", "month": "", "year": "" }, "spans": [ "market services" ], "worker_id": "", "hit_id": "" }
{ "number": [], "date": [], "spans": [], "worker_id": [], "hit_id": [] }
history_2303
At the 2012 census, 59.5% of jobs in the Paris Region were in market services (12.0% in wholesale and retail trade, 9.7% in professional, scientific, and technical services, 6.5% in information and communication, 6.5% in transportation and warehousing, 5.9% in finance and insurance, 5.8% in administrative and support services, 4.6% in accommodation and food services, and 8.5% in various other market services), 26.9% in non-market services (10.4% in human health and social work activities, 9.6% in public administration and defence, and 6.9% in education), 8.2% in manufacturing and utilities (6.6% in manufacturing and 1.5% in utilities), 5.2% in construction, and 0.2% in agriculture.
What professions fall under market services?
e9d4c762-bc1a-4439-b794-124d53026665
{ "number": "", "date": { "day": "", "month": "", "year": "" }, "spans": [ "wholesale and retail trade", "professional, scientific, and technical services", "information and communication", "transportation and warehousing", "finance and insurance", "administrative and support services", "accommodation and food services" ], "worker_id": "", "hit_id": "" }
{ "number": [], "date": [], "spans": [], "worker_id": [], "hit_id": [] }
history_2303
At the 2012 census, 59.5% of jobs in the Paris Region were in market services (12.0% in wholesale and retail trade, 9.7% in professional, scientific, and technical services, 6.5% in information and communication, 6.5% in transportation and warehousing, 5.9% in finance and insurance, 5.8% in administrative and support services, 4.6% in accommodation and food services, and 8.5% in various other market services), 26.9% in non-market services (10.4% in human health and social work activities, 9.6% in public administration and defence, and 6.9% in education), 8.2% in manufacturing and utilities (6.6% in manufacturing and 1.5% in utilities), 5.2% in construction, and 0.2% in agriculture.
What percentage was higher, manufacturing or utilities?
3ac4e6b9-3274-41c4-b470-c6ee84495ebc
{ "number": "", "date": { "day": "", "month": "", "year": "" }, "spans": [ "manufacturing" ], "worker_id": "", "hit_id": "" }
{ "number": [], "date": [], "spans": [], "worker_id": [], "hit_id": [] }
history_2303
At the 2012 census, 59.5% of jobs in the Paris Region were in market services (12.0% in wholesale and retail trade, 9.7% in professional, scientific, and technical services, 6.5% in information and communication, 6.5% in transportation and warehousing, 5.9% in finance and insurance, 5.8% in administrative and support services, 4.6% in accommodation and food services, and 8.5% in various other market services), 26.9% in non-market services (10.4% in human health and social work activities, 9.6% in public administration and defence, and 6.9% in education), 8.2% in manufacturing and utilities (6.6% in manufacturing and 1.5% in utilities), 5.2% in construction, and 0.2% in agriculture.
How many percent more was market services over agriculture and construction combined?
e15f3e21-effb-4a45-a319-551f16cb206d
{ "number": "54.1", "date": { "day": "", "month": "", "year": "" }, "spans": [], "worker_id": "", "hit_id": "" }
{ "number": [], "date": [], "spans": [], "worker_id": [], "hit_id": [] }
history_2303
At the 2012 census, 59.5% of jobs in the Paris Region were in market services (12.0% in wholesale and retail trade, 9.7% in professional, scientific, and technical services, 6.5% in information and communication, 6.5% in transportation and warehousing, 5.9% in finance and insurance, 5.8% in administrative and support services, 4.6% in accommodation and food services, and 8.5% in various other market services), 26.9% in non-market services (10.4% in human health and social work activities, 9.6% in public administration and defence, and 6.9% in education), 8.2% in manufacturing and utilities (6.6% in manufacturing and 1.5% in utilities), 5.2% in construction, and 0.2% in agriculture.
How many percent more was market services than all other services combined?
ad3893f3-cca8-422a-97a4-94954e2d3a4e
{ "number": "19", "date": { "day": "", "month": "", "year": "" }, "spans": [], "worker_id": "", "hit_id": "" }
{ "number": [], "date": [], "spans": [], "worker_id": [], "hit_id": [] }
history_2303
At the 2012 census, 59.5% of jobs in the Paris Region were in market services (12.0% in wholesale and retail trade, 9.7% in professional, scientific, and technical services, 6.5% in information and communication, 6.5% in transportation and warehousing, 5.9% in finance and insurance, 5.8% in administrative and support services, 4.6% in accommodation and food services, and 8.5% in various other market services), 26.9% in non-market services (10.4% in human health and social work activities, 9.6% in public administration and defence, and 6.9% in education), 8.2% in manufacturing and utilities (6.6% in manufacturing and 1.5% in utilities), 5.2% in construction, and 0.2% in agriculture.
How many more percent was market services over non-market services and agriculture?
9cd25c3e-69b8-4b8b-adca-80dd5800c30b
{ "number": "32.4", "date": { "day": "", "month": "", "year": "" }, "spans": [], "worker_id": "", "hit_id": "" }
{ "number": [], "date": [], "spans": [], "worker_id": [], "hit_id": [] }
history_2303
At the 2012 census, 59.5% of jobs in the Paris Region were in market services (12.0% in wholesale and retail trade, 9.7% in professional, scientific, and technical services, 6.5% in information and communication, 6.5% in transportation and warehousing, 5.9% in finance and insurance, 5.8% in administrative and support services, 4.6% in accommodation and food services, and 8.5% in various other market services), 26.9% in non-market services (10.4% in human health and social work activities, 9.6% in public administration and defence, and 6.9% in education), 8.2% in manufacturing and utilities (6.6% in manufacturing and 1.5% in utilities), 5.2% in construction, and 0.2% in agriculture.
How many more percent were non-market services over construction and agriculture?
3c0fd06c-ee91-45d7-b148-325aa11f8994
{ "number": "21.5", "date": { "day": "", "month": "", "year": "" }, "spans": [], "worker_id": "", "hit_id": "" }
{ "number": [], "date": [], "spans": [], "worker_id": [], "hit_id": [] }
history_2303
At the 2012 census, 59.5% of jobs in the Paris Region were in market services (12.0% in wholesale and retail trade, 9.7% in professional, scientific, and technical services, 6.5% in information and communication, 6.5% in transportation and warehousing, 5.9% in finance and insurance, 5.8% in administrative and support services, 4.6% in accommodation and food services, and 8.5% in various other market services), 26.9% in non-market services (10.4% in human health and social work activities, 9.6% in public administration and defence, and 6.9% in education), 8.2% in manufacturing and utilities (6.6% in manufacturing and 1.5% in utilities), 5.2% in construction, and 0.2% in agriculture.
What was the second largest segment of market services?
d1e2d480-86a1-4d49-9601-8d749ab325d5
{ "number": "", "date": { "day": "", "month": "", "year": "" }, "spans": [ "professional, scientific, and technical services" ], "worker_id": "", "hit_id": "" }
{ "number": [], "date": [], "spans": [], "worker_id": [], "hit_id": [] }
history_2303
At the 2012 census, 59.5% of jobs in the Paris Region were in market services (12.0% in wholesale and retail trade, 9.7% in professional, scientific, and technical services, 6.5% in information and communication, 6.5% in transportation and warehousing, 5.9% in finance and insurance, 5.8% in administrative and support services, 4.6% in accommodation and food services, and 8.5% in various other market services), 26.9% in non-market services (10.4% in human health and social work activities, 9.6% in public administration and defence, and 6.9% in education), 8.2% in manufacturing and utilities (6.6% in manufacturing and 1.5% in utilities), 5.2% in construction, and 0.2% in agriculture.
Which market services made up between 6 and 7%?
d785e210-3693-42f5-99c7-248d90a91dfb
{ "number": "", "date": { "day": "", "month": "", "year": "" }, "spans": [ "information and communication", "transportation and warehousing" ], "worker_id": "", "hit_id": "" }
{ "number": [], "date": [], "spans": [], "worker_id": [], "hit_id": [] }
history_2303
At the 2012 census, 59.5% of jobs in the Paris Region were in market services (12.0% in wholesale and retail trade, 9.7% in professional, scientific, and technical services, 6.5% in information and communication, 6.5% in transportation and warehousing, 5.9% in finance and insurance, 5.8% in administrative and support services, 4.6% in accommodation and food services, and 8.5% in various other market services), 26.9% in non-market services (10.4% in human health and social work activities, 9.6% in public administration and defence, and 6.9% in education), 8.2% in manufacturing and utilities (6.6% in manufacturing and 1.5% in utilities), 5.2% in construction, and 0.2% in agriculture.
How many more percent did the top market service have compared with the smallest?
520b17de-53f8-4e87-936f-6cf0ee0c0e77
{ "number": "7.4", "date": { "day": "", "month": "", "year": "" }, "spans": [], "worker_id": "", "hit_id": "" }
{ "number": [], "date": [], "spans": [], "worker_id": [], "hit_id": [] }
history_2303
At the 2012 census, 59.5% of jobs in the Paris Region were in market services (12.0% in wholesale and retail trade, 9.7% in professional, scientific, and technical services, 6.5% in information and communication, 6.5% in transportation and warehousing, 5.9% in finance and insurance, 5.8% in administrative and support services, 4.6% in accommodation and food services, and 8.5% in various other market services), 26.9% in non-market services (10.4% in human health and social work activities, 9.6% in public administration and defence, and 6.9% in education), 8.2% in manufacturing and utilities (6.6% in manufacturing and 1.5% in utilities), 5.2% in construction, and 0.2% in agriculture.
How many segments of market services were above 6%?
c55d9d5d-3878-4fbd-862c-bf70bfd4839f
{ "number": "4", "date": { "day": "", "month": "", "year": "" }, "spans": [], "worker_id": "", "hit_id": "" }
{ "number": [], "date": [], "spans": [], "worker_id": [], "hit_id": [] }
history_2303
At the 2012 census, 59.5% of jobs in the Paris Region were in market services (12.0% in wholesale and retail trade, 9.7% in professional, scientific, and technical services, 6.5% in information and communication, 6.5% in transportation and warehousing, 5.9% in finance and insurance, 5.8% in administrative and support services, 4.6% in accommodation and food services, and 8.5% in various other market services), 26.9% in non-market services (10.4% in human health and social work activities, 9.6% in public administration and defence, and 6.9% in education), 8.2% in manufacturing and utilities (6.6% in manufacturing and 1.5% in utilities), 5.2% in construction, and 0.2% in agriculture.
What was the smallest group in non-market services?
a3e02555-202b-4217-8603-9aa6d3082df5
{ "number": "", "date": { "day": "", "month": "", "year": "" }, "spans": [ "education" ], "worker_id": "", "hit_id": "" }
{ "number": [], "date": [], "spans": [], "worker_id": [], "hit_id": [] }
history_2303
At the 2012 census, 59.5% of jobs in the Paris Region were in market services (12.0% in wholesale and retail trade, 9.7% in professional, scientific, and technical services, 6.5% in information and communication, 6.5% in transportation and warehousing, 5.9% in finance and insurance, 5.8% in administrative and support services, 4.6% in accommodation and food services, and 8.5% in various other market services), 26.9% in non-market services (10.4% in human health and social work activities, 9.6% in public administration and defence, and 6.9% in education), 8.2% in manufacturing and utilities (6.6% in manufacturing and 1.5% in utilities), 5.2% in construction, and 0.2% in agriculture.
How many percent of the non-market services were not in education?
ef9fd491-1f8e-4a97-89de-dd652ba4794a
{ "number": "20", "date": { "day": "", "month": "", "year": "" }, "spans": [], "worker_id": "", "hit_id": "" }
{ "number": [], "date": [], "spans": [], "worker_id": [], "hit_id": [] }
history_2303
At the 2012 census, 59.5% of jobs in the Paris Region were in market services (12.0% in wholesale and retail trade, 9.7% in professional, scientific, and technical services, 6.5% in information and communication, 6.5% in transportation and warehousing, 5.9% in finance and insurance, 5.8% in administrative and support services, 4.6% in accommodation and food services, and 8.5% in various other market services), 26.9% in non-market services (10.4% in human health and social work activities, 9.6% in public administration and defence, and 6.9% in education), 8.2% in manufacturing and utilities (6.6% in manufacturing and 1.5% in utilities), 5.2% in construction, and 0.2% in agriculture.
Overall in Paris, how many percent more jobs were in market services compared with the second smallest job category?
3824b84c-439c-435a-9b46-bd1eb0b8892e
{ "number": "54.3", "date": { "day": "", "month": "", "year": "" }, "spans": [], "worker_id": "", "hit_id": "" }
{ "number": [], "date": [], "spans": [], "worker_id": [], "hit_id": [] }
history_2303
At the 2012 census, 59.5% of jobs in the Paris Region were in market services (12.0% in wholesale and retail trade, 9.7% in professional, scientific, and technical services, 6.5% in information and communication, 6.5% in transportation and warehousing, 5.9% in finance and insurance, 5.8% in administrative and support services, 4.6% in accommodation and food services, and 8.5% in various other market services), 26.9% in non-market services (10.4% in human health and social work activities, 9.6% in public administration and defence, and 6.9% in education), 8.2% in manufacturing and utilities (6.6% in manufacturing and 1.5% in utilities), 5.2% in construction, and 0.2% in agriculture.
How many percent of jobs were in manufacturing, construction and agriculture?
8718ec5d-20da-41e7-af67-86035bb13076
{ "number": "13.6", "date": { "day": "", "month": "", "year": "" }, "spans": [], "worker_id": "", "hit_id": "" }
{ "number": [], "date": [], "spans": [], "worker_id": [], "hit_id": [] }
history_2303
At the 2012 census, 59.5% of jobs in the Paris Region were in market services (12.0% in wholesale and retail trade, 9.7% in professional, scientific, and technical services, 6.5% in information and communication, 6.5% in transportation and warehousing, 5.9% in finance and insurance, 5.8% in administrative and support services, 4.6% in accommodation and food services, and 8.5% in various other market services), 26.9% in non-market services (10.4% in human health and social work activities, 9.6% in public administration and defence, and 6.9% in education), 8.2% in manufacturing and utilities (6.6% in manufacturing and 1.5% in utilities), 5.2% in construction, and 0.2% in agriculture.
How many percent of the jobs in Paris were not in administrative and support services or accommodation and food services?
3856408f-4728-4125-b2cc-a58bb58b4fb9
{ "number": "89.6", "date": { "day": "", "month": "", "year": "" }, "spans": [], "worker_id": "", "hit_id": "" }
{ "number": [], "date": [], "spans": [], "worker_id": [], "hit_id": [] }
history_2303
At the 2012 census, 59.5% of jobs in the Paris Region were in market services (12.0% in wholesale and retail trade, 9.7% in professional, scientific, and technical services, 6.5% in information and communication, 6.5% in transportation and warehousing, 5.9% in finance and insurance, 5.8% in administrative and support services, 4.6% in accommodation and food services, and 8.5% in various other market services), 26.9% in non-market services (10.4% in human health and social work activities, 9.6% in public administration and defence, and 6.9% in education), 8.2% in manufacturing and utilities (6.6% in manufacturing and 1.5% in utilities), 5.2% in construction, and 0.2% in agriculture.
What all job categories in the Paris Region 2012 census had less than 8%?
218f28a0-5e37-46fb-9a30-8d9e624bb34e
{ "number": "", "date": { "day": "", "month": "", "year": "" }, "spans": [ "construction", "agriculture" ], "worker_id": "", "hit_id": "" }
{ "number": [], "date": [], "spans": [], "worker_id": [], "hit_id": [] }
history_2303
At the 2012 census, 59.5% of jobs in the Paris Region were in market services (12.0% in wholesale and retail trade, 9.7% in professional, scientific, and technical services, 6.5% in information and communication, 6.5% in transportation and warehousing, 5.9% in finance and insurance, 5.8% in administrative and support services, 4.6% in accommodation and food services, and 8.5% in various other market services), 26.9% in non-market services (10.4% in human health and social work activities, 9.6% in public administration and defence, and 6.9% in education), 8.2% in manufacturing and utilities (6.6% in manufacturing and 1.5% in utilities), 5.2% in construction, and 0.2% in agriculture.
What all subcategories are included in market services?
93b55cf1-43eb-4f0f-b534-7c418c350cca
{ "number": "", "date": { "day": "", "month": "", "year": "" }, "spans": [ "wholesale and retail trade", "professional, scientific, and technical services", "information and communication", "ransportation and warehousing", "finance and insurance", "administrative and support services", "accommodation and food services", "various other market services" ], "worker_id": "", "hit_id": "" }
{ "number": [], "date": [], "spans": [], "worker_id": [], "hit_id": [] }
history_2303
At the 2012 census, 59.5% of jobs in the Paris Region were in market services (12.0% in wholesale and retail trade, 9.7% in professional, scientific, and technical services, 6.5% in information and communication, 6.5% in transportation and warehousing, 5.9% in finance and insurance, 5.8% in administrative and support services, 4.6% in accommodation and food services, and 8.5% in various other market services), 26.9% in non-market services (10.4% in human health and social work activities, 9.6% in public administration and defence, and 6.9% in education), 8.2% in manufacturing and utilities (6.6% in manufacturing and 1.5% in utilities), 5.2% in construction, and 0.2% in agriculture.
What all subcategories are included in non-market services?
50d431e6-fafd-45ef-828e-e7ec6ed71541
{ "number": "", "date": { "day": "", "month": "", "year": "" }, "spans": [ "non-market services", "public administration and defence", "education" ], "worker_id": "", "hit_id": "" }
{ "number": [], "date": [], "spans": [], "worker_id": [], "hit_id": [] }
history_2303
At the 2012 census, 59.5% of jobs in the Paris Region were in market services (12.0% in wholesale and retail trade, 9.7% in professional, scientific, and technical services, 6.5% in information and communication, 6.5% in transportation and warehousing, 5.9% in finance and insurance, 5.8% in administrative and support services, 4.6% in accommodation and food services, and 8.5% in various other market services), 26.9% in non-market services (10.4% in human health and social work activities, 9.6% in public administration and defence, and 6.9% in education), 8.2% in manufacturing and utilities (6.6% in manufacturing and 1.5% in utilities), 5.2% in construction, and 0.2% in agriculture.
How many, in percent of the jobs were in both market services and non-market services combined?
ebe97c7a-2d1f-4aa8-a20e-961840f32b24
{ "number": "86.4", "date": { "day": "", "month": "", "year": "" }, "spans": [], "worker_id": "", "hit_id": "" }
{ "number": [], "date": [], "spans": [], "worker_id": [], "hit_id": [] }
nfl_2236
The Colts stayed home and took on the Jaguars. The Jags would manage to score early in the 1st quarter as Josh Scobee would kick a 44-yard field goal for a 3-0 lead. In the 2nd quarter, the Colts would get on the board as Adam Vinatieri would tie the game for his team 3-3 with a 42-yard field goal. This would eventually be the halftime score. Once again, the Colts found themselves being overpowered in the 2nd half of a game as Blaine Gabbert hooked up with Jarett Dillard on an 11-yard touchdown pass to send the game to a 10-3 score in the 3rd quarter followed up by Maurice Jones-Drew running for a 3-yard touchdown to make the final score 17-3. With the loss, the Colts entered their bye week at 0-10.
How many points in total were scored?
a2b69712-46a8-498e-b55d-d3a0c8c77dc5
{ "number": "20", "date": { "day": "", "month": "", "year": "" }, "spans": [], "worker_id": "", "hit_id": "" }
{ "number": [], "date": [], "spans": [], "worker_id": [], "hit_id": [] }
nfl_2236
The Colts stayed home and took on the Jaguars. The Jags would manage to score early in the 1st quarter as Josh Scobee would kick a 44-yard field goal for a 3-0 lead. In the 2nd quarter, the Colts would get on the board as Adam Vinatieri would tie the game for his team 3-3 with a 42-yard field goal. This would eventually be the halftime score. Once again, the Colts found themselves being overpowered in the 2nd half of a game as Blaine Gabbert hooked up with Jarett Dillard on an 11-yard touchdown pass to send the game to a 10-3 score in the 3rd quarter followed up by Maurice Jones-Drew running for a 3-yard touchdown to make the final score 17-3. With the loss, the Colts entered their bye week at 0-10.
How many points did the Jaguars win by?
f3839a59-3981-4666-ae3c-f059feedccaa
{ "number": "14", "date": { "day": "", "month": "", "year": "" }, "spans": [], "worker_id": "", "hit_id": "" }
{ "number": [], "date": [], "spans": [], "worker_id": [], "hit_id": [] }
nfl_2236
The Colts stayed home and took on the Jaguars. The Jags would manage to score early in the 1st quarter as Josh Scobee would kick a 44-yard field goal for a 3-0 lead. In the 2nd quarter, the Colts would get on the board as Adam Vinatieri would tie the game for his team 3-3 with a 42-yard field goal. This would eventually be the halftime score. Once again, the Colts found themselves being overpowered in the 2nd half of a game as Blaine Gabbert hooked up with Jarett Dillard on an 11-yard touchdown pass to send the game to a 10-3 score in the 3rd quarter followed up by Maurice Jones-Drew running for a 3-yard touchdown to make the final score 17-3. With the loss, the Colts entered their bye week at 0-10.
How many yards was the longest field goal?
7fa04d51-6783-42de-adb5-7bf8510fad48
{ "number": "", "date": { "day": "", "month": "", "year": "" }, "spans": [ "44-yard" ], "worker_id": "", "hit_id": "" }
{ "number": [], "date": [], "spans": [], "worker_id": [], "hit_id": [] }
nfl_3129
The Bengals grabbed the lead on their opening possession, with running back Jeremy Hill rushing for a 3-yard touchdown. The Broncos drove down to near the goal line on their second possession, which was aided by two Bengals' defensive penalties, however, the Broncos were forced to settle for a 20-yard field goal by placekicker Brandon McManus. Following a Bengals' fumble on a punt return near midfield, the Broncos took the lead, with quarterback Trevor Siemian connecting on a 41-yard touchdown pass to wide receiver Emmanuel Sanders. Following an exchange of punts, the Bengals went back ahead, with Hill rushing for his second touchdown from 4 yards out. The Broncos responded, with Siemian throwing another touchdown pass to Sanders from 7 yards out. However, the extra point attempt was blocked. Following a scoreless third quarter, a 34-yard field goal by placekicker Mike Nugent gave the Bengals a 17-16 lead early in the fourth quarter. The Broncos then assembled a 13-play, 82-yard drive, culminating with Siemian firing a 1-yard touchdown pass to tight end John Phillips (with an unsuccessful two-point conversion attempt). After the Bengals went three-and-out on their next possession, in which wide receiver A. J. Green dropped a critical third-down pass play, the Broncos added to their lead, with Siemian throwing his fourth touchdown of the game—a 55-yarder to wide receiver Demaryius Thomas with 4:32 remaining in the game. The Broncos' defense stood their ground on the Bengals' last two possessions. Trevor Siemian became the first quarterback in NFL history to throw for 300 yards and four touchdowns without an interception in a first career road start. With linebacker Shane Ray recording three sacks, this was the first time in franchise history in which the Broncos had two different players record 3+ sacks in a single game; linebacker Von Miller achieved three sacks vs. the Indianapolis Colts during the previous week.
Which player had the first touchdown catch of the game?
5e4aeb9a-d2cb-4beb-b61b-58054883d8c1
{ "number": "", "date": { "day": "", "month": "", "year": "" }, "spans": [ "Emmanuel Sanders" ], "worker_id": "", "hit_id": "" }
{ "number": [], "date": [], "spans": [], "worker_id": [], "hit_id": [] }
nfl_3129
The Bengals grabbed the lead on their opening possession, with running back Jeremy Hill rushing for a 3-yard touchdown. The Broncos drove down to near the goal line on their second possession, which was aided by two Bengals' defensive penalties, however, the Broncos were forced to settle for a 20-yard field goal by placekicker Brandon McManus. Following a Bengals' fumble on a punt return near midfield, the Broncos took the lead, with quarterback Trevor Siemian connecting on a 41-yard touchdown pass to wide receiver Emmanuel Sanders. Following an exchange of punts, the Bengals went back ahead, with Hill rushing for his second touchdown from 4 yards out. The Broncos responded, with Siemian throwing another touchdown pass to Sanders from 7 yards out. However, the extra point attempt was blocked. Following a scoreless third quarter, a 34-yard field goal by placekicker Mike Nugent gave the Bengals a 17-16 lead early in the fourth quarter. The Broncos then assembled a 13-play, 82-yard drive, culminating with Siemian firing a 1-yard touchdown pass to tight end John Phillips (with an unsuccessful two-point conversion attempt). After the Bengals went three-and-out on their next possession, in which wide receiver A. J. Green dropped a critical third-down pass play, the Broncos added to their lead, with Siemian throwing his fourth touchdown of the game—a 55-yarder to wide receiver Demaryius Thomas with 4:32 remaining in the game. The Broncos' defense stood their ground on the Bengals' last two possessions. Trevor Siemian became the first quarterback in NFL history to throw for 300 yards and four touchdowns without an interception in a first career road start. With linebacker Shane Ray recording three sacks, this was the first time in franchise history in which the Broncos had two different players record 3+ sacks in a single game; linebacker Von Miller achieved three sacks vs. the Indianapolis Colts during the previous week.
How many more touchdowns than interceptions did Siemian have?
0f2af705-05d1-4a6e-adb4-b89d89345076
{ "number": "4", "date": { "day": "", "month": "", "year": "" }, "spans": [], "worker_id": "", "hit_id": "" }
{ "number": [], "date": [], "spans": [], "worker_id": [], "hit_id": [] }
nfl_3129
The Bengals grabbed the lead on their opening possession, with running back Jeremy Hill rushing for a 3-yard touchdown. The Broncos drove down to near the goal line on their second possession, which was aided by two Bengals' defensive penalties, however, the Broncos were forced to settle for a 20-yard field goal by placekicker Brandon McManus. Following a Bengals' fumble on a punt return near midfield, the Broncos took the lead, with quarterback Trevor Siemian connecting on a 41-yard touchdown pass to wide receiver Emmanuel Sanders. Following an exchange of punts, the Bengals went back ahead, with Hill rushing for his second touchdown from 4 yards out. The Broncos responded, with Siemian throwing another touchdown pass to Sanders from 7 yards out. However, the extra point attempt was blocked. Following a scoreless third quarter, a 34-yard field goal by placekicker Mike Nugent gave the Bengals a 17-16 lead early in the fourth quarter. The Broncos then assembled a 13-play, 82-yard drive, culminating with Siemian firing a 1-yard touchdown pass to tight end John Phillips (with an unsuccessful two-point conversion attempt). After the Bengals went three-and-out on their next possession, in which wide receiver A. J. Green dropped a critical third-down pass play, the Broncos added to their lead, with Siemian throwing his fourth touchdown of the game—a 55-yarder to wide receiver Demaryius Thomas with 4:32 remaining in the game. The Broncos' defense stood their ground on the Bengals' last two possessions. Trevor Siemian became the first quarterback in NFL history to throw for 300 yards and four touchdowns without an interception in a first career road start. With linebacker Shane Ray recording three sacks, this was the first time in franchise history in which the Broncos had two different players record 3+ sacks in a single game; linebacker Von Miller achieved three sacks vs. the Indianapolis Colts during the previous week.
Which player had the shortest touchdown play?
7bf54363-c5bb-41df-9725-d71e4c768d1c
{ "number": "", "date": { "day": "", "month": "", "year": "" }, "spans": [ "John Phillips" ], "worker_id": "", "hit_id": "" }
{ "number": [], "date": [], "spans": [], "worker_id": [], "hit_id": [] }
history_2230
There were 4,280 households of which 32.9% had children under the age of 18 living with them, 39.2% were married couples living together, 16.4% had a female householder with no husband present, 5.7% had a male householder with no wife present, and 38.7% were non-families. 32.0% of all households were made up of individuals and 14% had someone living alone who was 65 years of age or older. The average household size was 2.34 and the average family size was 2.90.
How many in percent of households weren't married couples living together?
49aee182-49f2-4b27-bb99-7eb3a944e691
{ "number": "60.8", "date": { "day": "", "month": "", "year": "" }, "spans": [], "worker_id": "", "hit_id": "" }
{ "number": [], "date": [], "spans": [], "worker_id": [], "hit_id": [] }
history_2230
There were 4,280 households of which 32.9% had children under the age of 18 living with them, 39.2% were married couples living together, 16.4% had a female householder with no husband present, 5.7% had a male householder with no wife present, and 38.7% were non-families. 32.0% of all households were made up of individuals and 14% had someone living alone who was 65 years of age or older. The average household size was 2.34 and the average family size was 2.90.
How many in percent of households had a female householder with a husband present?
aea75acd-1c67-4d3f-a834-b92b1173f296
{ "number": "83.6", "date": { "day": "", "month": "", "year": "" }, "spans": [], "worker_id": "", "hit_id": "" }
{ "number": [], "date": [], "spans": [], "worker_id": [], "hit_id": [] }
history_2230
There were 4,280 households of which 32.9% had children under the age of 18 living with them, 39.2% were married couples living together, 16.4% had a female householder with no husband present, 5.7% had a male householder with no wife present, and 38.7% were non-families. 32.0% of all households were made up of individuals and 14% had someone living alone who was 65 years of age or older. The average household size was 2.34 and the average family size was 2.90.
How many in percent of households were families?
47638d12-4585-4524-8922-348105e0f102
{ "number": "61.3", "date": { "day": "", "month": "", "year": "" }, "spans": [], "worker_id": "", "hit_id": "" }
{ "number": [], "date": [], "spans": [], "worker_id": [], "hit_id": [] }
history_2230
There were 4,280 households of which 32.9% had children under the age of 18 living with them, 39.2% were married couples living together, 16.4% had a female householder with no husband present, 5.7% had a male householder with no wife present, and 38.7% were non-families. 32.0% of all households were made up of individuals and 14% had someone living alone who was 65 years of age or older. The average household size was 2.34 and the average family size was 2.90.
How many in percent of households weren't made up of individuals?
f1795b5a-a1de-4b00-af55-e3fe763508af
{ "number": "68", "date": { "day": "", "month": "", "year": "" }, "spans": [], "worker_id": "", "hit_id": "" }
{ "number": [], "date": [], "spans": [], "worker_id": [], "hit_id": [] }
history_2230
There were 4,280 households of which 32.9% had children under the age of 18 living with them, 39.2% were married couples living together, 16.4% had a female householder with no husband present, 5.7% had a male householder with no wife present, and 38.7% were non-families. 32.0% of all households were made up of individuals and 14% had someone living alone who was 65 years of age or older. The average household size was 2.34 and the average family size was 2.90.
How many in percent of households had someone living alone who wasn't 65 years of age or older?
dade857e-e990-4dd9-8fcd-45b874784357
{ "number": "86", "date": { "day": "", "month": "", "year": "" }, "spans": [], "worker_id": "", "hit_id": "" }
{ "number": [], "date": [], "spans": [], "worker_id": [], "hit_id": [] }
history_2230
There were 4,280 households of which 32.9% had children under the age of 18 living with them, 39.2% were married couples living together, 16.4% had a female householder with no husband present, 5.7% had a male householder with no wife present, and 38.7% were non-families. 32.0% of all households were made up of individuals and 14% had someone living alone who was 65 years of age or older. The average household size was 2.34 and the average family size was 2.90.
Which group for households is larger: married couples living together or non-families?
befad3c6-9301-4944-88a2-507ba8a725ad
{ "number": "", "date": { "day": "", "month": "", "year": "" }, "spans": [ "married couples living together" ], "worker_id": "", "hit_id": "" }
{ "number": [], "date": [], "spans": [], "worker_id": [], "hit_id": [] }
history_2230
There were 4,280 households of which 32.9% had children under the age of 18 living with them, 39.2% were married couples living together, 16.4% had a female householder with no husband present, 5.7% had a male householder with no wife present, and 38.7% were non-families. 32.0% of all households were made up of individuals and 14% had someone living alone who was 65 years of age or older. The average household size was 2.34 and the average family size was 2.90.
Which group for households is smaller: married couples living together or non-families?
33362644-ddbe-44dc-b0d3-d63aa0dc95fa
{ "number": "", "date": { "day": "", "month": "", "year": "" }, "spans": [ "non-families" ], "worker_id": "", "hit_id": "" }
{ "number": [], "date": [], "spans": [], "worker_id": [], "hit_id": [] }
history_2230
There were 4,280 households of which 32.9% had children under the age of 18 living with them, 39.2% were married couples living together, 16.4% had a female householder with no husband present, 5.7% had a male householder with no wife present, and 38.7% were non-families. 32.0% of all households were made up of individuals and 14% had someone living alone who was 65 years of age or older. The average household size was 2.34 and the average family size was 2.90.
Which group for households is larger: married couples living together or made up of individuals?
94d37855-37f9-47f1-9b68-5aa6f82b10fc
{ "number": "", "date": { "day": "", "month": "", "year": "" }, "spans": [ "married couples living together" ], "worker_id": "", "hit_id": "" }
{ "number": [], "date": [], "spans": [], "worker_id": [], "hit_id": [] }
history_2230
There were 4,280 households of which 32.9% had children under the age of 18 living with them, 39.2% were married couples living together, 16.4% had a female householder with no husband present, 5.7% had a male householder with no wife present, and 38.7% were non-families. 32.0% of all households were made up of individuals and 14% had someone living alone who was 65 years of age or older. The average household size was 2.34 and the average family size was 2.90.
Which group for households is smaller: married couples living together or made up of individuals?
e2d88fe7-182d-40dd-8fe5-6bea41ecb3c6
{ "number": "", "date": { "day": "", "month": "", "year": "" }, "spans": [ "made up of individuals" ], "worker_id": "", "hit_id": "" }
{ "number": [], "date": [], "spans": [], "worker_id": [], "hit_id": [] }
history_2230
There were 4,280 households of which 32.9% had children under the age of 18 living with them, 39.2% were married couples living together, 16.4% had a female householder with no husband present, 5.7% had a male householder with no wife present, and 38.7% were non-families. 32.0% of all households were made up of individuals and 14% had someone living alone who was 65 years of age or older. The average household size was 2.34 and the average family size was 2.90.
Which group for households is larger: average family size or average household size?
90623b49-d5fb-4c4e-9238-e4bba5521346
{ "number": "", "date": { "day": "", "month": "", "year": "" }, "spans": [ "average family size" ], "worker_id": "", "hit_id": "" }
{ "number": [], "date": [], "spans": [], "worker_id": [], "hit_id": [] }
history_2230
There were 4,280 households of which 32.9% had children under the age of 18 living with them, 39.2% were married couples living together, 16.4% had a female householder with no husband present, 5.7% had a male householder with no wife present, and 38.7% were non-families. 32.0% of all households were made up of individuals and 14% had someone living alone who was 65 years of age or older. The average household size was 2.34 and the average family size was 2.90.
Which group for households is smaller: average family size or average household size?
208c346c-6519-419b-8183-ac1985f017c7
{ "number": "", "date": { "day": "", "month": "", "year": "" }, "spans": [ "average household size" ], "worker_id": "", "hit_id": "" }
{ "number": [], "date": [], "spans": [], "worker_id": [], "hit_id": [] }
history_2230
There were 4,280 households of which 32.9% had children under the age of 18 living with them, 39.2% were married couples living together, 16.4% had a female householder with no husband present, 5.7% had a male householder with no wife present, and 38.7% were non-families. 32.0% of all households were made up of individuals and 14% had someone living alone who was 65 years of age or older. The average household size was 2.34 and the average family size was 2.90.
How many in percent of households didn't have children under the age of 18 living with them?
d17ce669-9f53-4803-8ee5-e764d51b3599
{ "number": "67.1", "date": { "day": "", "month": "", "year": "" }, "spans": [], "worker_id": "", "hit_id": "" }
{ "number": [], "date": [], "spans": [], "worker_id": [], "hit_id": [] }
history_2230
There were 4,280 households of which 32.9% had children under the age of 18 living with them, 39.2% were married couples living together, 16.4% had a female householder with no husband present, 5.7% had a male householder with no wife present, and 38.7% were non-families. 32.0% of all households were made up of individuals and 14% had someone living alone who was 65 years of age or older. The average household size was 2.34 and the average family size was 2.90.
How many in percent of households weren't married couples living together?
077bcca8-7e72-4ff3-b1cf-3b75c3d5b628
{ "number": "60.8", "date": { "day": "", "month": "", "year": "" }, "spans": [], "worker_id": "", "hit_id": "" }
{ "number": [], "date": [], "spans": [], "worker_id": [], "hit_id": [] }
history_2230
There were 4,280 households of which 32.9% had children under the age of 18 living with them, 39.2% were married couples living together, 16.4% had a female householder with no husband present, 5.7% had a male householder with no wife present, and 38.7% were non-families. 32.0% of all households were made up of individuals and 14% had someone living alone who was 65 years of age or older. The average household size was 2.34 and the average family size was 2.90.
How many in percent of households had a female householder with a husband present?
12eb9edb-8fa2-4d8f-8b2b-bbbe8469d1c1
{ "number": "83.6", "date": { "day": "", "month": "", "year": "" }, "spans": [], "worker_id": "", "hit_id": "" }
{ "number": [], "date": [], "spans": [], "worker_id": [], "hit_id": [] }
history_2230
There were 4,280 households of which 32.9% had children under the age of 18 living with them, 39.2% were married couples living together, 16.4% had a female householder with no husband present, 5.7% had a male householder with no wife present, and 38.7% were non-families. 32.0% of all households were made up of individuals and 14% had someone living alone who was 65 years of age or older. The average household size was 2.34 and the average family size was 2.90.
How many in percent of households were families?
82b025b6-edc3-43c6-b0c2-553bde92f491
{ "number": "61.3", "date": { "day": "", "month": "", "year": "" }, "spans": [], "worker_id": "", "hit_id": "" }
{ "number": [], "date": [], "spans": [], "worker_id": [], "hit_id": [] }
history_2230
There were 4,280 households of which 32.9% had children under the age of 18 living with them, 39.2% were married couples living together, 16.4% had a female householder with no husband present, 5.7% had a male householder with no wife present, and 38.7% were non-families. 32.0% of all households were made up of individuals and 14% had someone living alone who was 65 years of age or older. The average household size was 2.34 and the average family size was 2.90.
How many in percent of households weren't made up of individuals?
0cd22faa-43b2-4259-817e-b0cb2e40690c
{ "number": "68", "date": { "day": "", "month": "", "year": "" }, "spans": [], "worker_id": "", "hit_id": "" }
{ "number": [], "date": [], "spans": [], "worker_id": [], "hit_id": [] }
history_2230
There were 4,280 households of which 32.9% had children under the age of 18 living with them, 39.2% were married couples living together, 16.4% had a female householder with no husband present, 5.7% had a male householder with no wife present, and 38.7% were non-families. 32.0% of all households were made up of individuals and 14% had someone living alone who was 65 years of age or older. The average household size was 2.34 and the average family size was 2.90.
How many in percent of households had someone living alone who wasn't 65 years of age or older?
f1902feb-6ec0-4a1a-9a59-7cfac3429fe8
{ "number": "86", "date": { "day": "", "month": "", "year": "" }, "spans": [], "worker_id": "", "hit_id": "" }
{ "number": [], "date": [], "spans": [], "worker_id": [], "hit_id": [] }
history_2230
There were 4,280 households of which 32.9% had children under the age of 18 living with them, 39.2% were married couples living together, 16.4% had a female householder with no husband present, 5.7% had a male householder with no wife present, and 38.7% were non-families. 32.0% of all households were made up of individuals and 14% had someone living alone who was 65 years of age or older. The average household size was 2.34 and the average family size was 2.90.
Which group for households is larger: married couples living together or non-families?
980a1813-9e36-49d2-8e52-38018cf05173
{ "number": "", "date": { "day": "", "month": "", "year": "" }, "spans": [ "married couples living together" ], "worker_id": "", "hit_id": "" }
{ "number": [], "date": [], "spans": [], "worker_id": [], "hit_id": [] }
history_2230
There were 4,280 households of which 32.9% had children under the age of 18 living with them, 39.2% were married couples living together, 16.4% had a female householder with no husband present, 5.7% had a male householder with no wife present, and 38.7% were non-families. 32.0% of all households were made up of individuals and 14% had someone living alone who was 65 years of age or older. The average household size was 2.34 and the average family size was 2.90.
Which group for households is smaller: married couples living together or non-families?
fe7d81ab-23d1-4951-9b42-6cb052e42eca
{ "number": "", "date": { "day": "", "month": "", "year": "" }, "spans": [ "non-families" ], "worker_id": "", "hit_id": "" }
{ "number": [], "date": [], "spans": [], "worker_id": [], "hit_id": [] }
history_2230
There were 4,280 households of which 32.9% had children under the age of 18 living with them, 39.2% were married couples living together, 16.4% had a female householder with no husband present, 5.7% had a male householder with no wife present, and 38.7% were non-families. 32.0% of all households were made up of individuals and 14% had someone living alone who was 65 years of age or older. The average household size was 2.34 and the average family size was 2.90.
Which group for households is larger: married couples living together or made up of individuals?
61af6d56-7d61-472d-a4de-5acdabe98931
{ "number": "", "date": { "day": "", "month": "", "year": "" }, "spans": [ "married couples living together" ], "worker_id": "", "hit_id": "" }
{ "number": [], "date": [], "spans": [], "worker_id": [], "hit_id": [] }
history_2230
There were 4,280 households of which 32.9% had children under the age of 18 living with them, 39.2% were married couples living together, 16.4% had a female householder with no husband present, 5.7% had a male householder with no wife present, and 38.7% were non-families. 32.0% of all households were made up of individuals and 14% had someone living alone who was 65 years of age or older. The average household size was 2.34 and the average family size was 2.90.
Which group for households is smaller: married couples living together or made up of individuals?
0df7f7bc-c534-4e93-a503-b88a4d3e82be
{ "number": "", "date": { "day": "", "month": "", "year": "" }, "spans": [ "made up of individuals" ], "worker_id": "", "hit_id": "" }
{ "number": [], "date": [], "spans": [], "worker_id": [], "hit_id": [] }
history_2230
There were 4,280 households of which 32.9% had children under the age of 18 living with them, 39.2% were married couples living together, 16.4% had a female householder with no husband present, 5.7% had a male householder with no wife present, and 38.7% were non-families. 32.0% of all households were made up of individuals and 14% had someone living alone who was 65 years of age or older. The average household size was 2.34 and the average family size was 2.90.
Which group for households is larger: average family size or average household size?
c1a05b22-2f51-4b77-89d8-bbaf6eebcb68
{ "number": "", "date": { "day": "", "month": "", "year": "" }, "spans": [ "average family size" ], "worker_id": "", "hit_id": "" }
{ "number": [], "date": [], "spans": [], "worker_id": [], "hit_id": [] }
history_2230
There were 4,280 households of which 32.9% had children under the age of 18 living with them, 39.2% were married couples living together, 16.4% had a female householder with no husband present, 5.7% had a male householder with no wife present, and 38.7% were non-families. 32.0% of all households were made up of individuals and 14% had someone living alone who was 65 years of age or older. The average household size was 2.34 and the average family size was 2.90.
Which group for households is smaller: average family size or average household size?
9f4e9b3b-78c8-4681-aee3-356fe187a899
{ "number": "", "date": { "day": "", "month": "", "year": "" }, "spans": [ "average household size" ], "worker_id": "", "hit_id": "" }
{ "number": [], "date": [], "spans": [], "worker_id": [], "hit_id": [] }