section_id
stringlengths 5
12
| passage
stringlengths 103
9.68k
| question
stringlengths 4
388
| query_id
stringlengths 36
36
| answer
dict | validated_answers
sequence |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
history_3004 | A large share of the UNs expenditure addresses its core mission of peace and security, and this budget is assessed separately from the main organizational budget. The peacekeeping budget for the 2015-16 fiscal year was $8.27 billion, supporting 82,318 troops deployed in 15 missions around the world. UN peace operations are funded by assessments, using a formula derived from the regular funding scale that includes a weighted surcharge for the five permanent Security Council members, who must approve all peacekeeping operations. This surcharge serves to offset discounted peacekeeping assessment rates for less developed countries. In 2017, the top 8 providers of assessed financial contributions to Peacekeeping operations were the United States (28.47%), China (10.25%), Japan (9.68%), Germany (6.39%), France (6.28%), United Kingdom (5.77%), Russian Federation (3.99%) and Italy (3.75%). | Who is the smallest provider of assessed financial contributions to Peacekeeping operations? | b71566e4-fad8-4eeb-bcff-9e36d0f08286 | {
"number": "",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [
"Italy"
],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [],
"date": [],
"spans": [],
"worker_id": [],
"hit_id": []
} |
history_3004 | A large share of the UNs expenditure addresses its core mission of peace and security, and this budget is assessed separately from the main organizational budget. The peacekeeping budget for the 2015-16 fiscal year was $8.27 billion, supporting 82,318 troops deployed in 15 missions around the world. UN peace operations are funded by assessments, using a formula derived from the regular funding scale that includes a weighted surcharge for the five permanent Security Council members, who must approve all peacekeeping operations. This surcharge serves to offset discounted peacekeeping assessment rates for less developed countries. In 2017, the top 8 providers of assessed financial contributions to Peacekeeping operations were the United States (28.47%), China (10.25%), Japan (9.68%), Germany (6.39%), France (6.28%), United Kingdom (5.77%), Russian Federation (3.99%) and Italy (3.75%). | How many more percent did China contribute to financial contributions to Peacekeeping operations than Germany? | d2c25626-6d94-45ec-ab48-4b0687a40c9e | {
"number": "3.86",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [],
"date": [],
"spans": [],
"worker_id": [],
"hit_id": []
} |
history_3004 | A large share of the UNs expenditure addresses its core mission of peace and security, and this budget is assessed separately from the main organizational budget. The peacekeeping budget for the 2015-16 fiscal year was $8.27 billion, supporting 82,318 troops deployed in 15 missions around the world. UN peace operations are funded by assessments, using a formula derived from the regular funding scale that includes a weighted surcharge for the five permanent Security Council members, who must approve all peacekeeping operations. This surcharge serves to offset discounted peacekeeping assessment rates for less developed countries. In 2017, the top 8 providers of assessed financial contributions to Peacekeeping operations were the United States (28.47%), China (10.25%), Japan (9.68%), Germany (6.39%), France (6.28%), United Kingdom (5.77%), Russian Federation (3.99%) and Italy (3.75%). | How many more percent toward financial contributions to Peacekeeping operations did the largest contributor contribute than the smallest contributor? | a89c7536-43b9-41e6-99ef-64106c41ccb5 | {
"number": "24.72",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [],
"date": [],
"spans": [],
"worker_id": [],
"hit_id": []
} |
history_3004 | A large share of the UNs expenditure addresses its core mission of peace and security, and this budget is assessed separately from the main organizational budget. The peacekeeping budget for the 2015-16 fiscal year was $8.27 billion, supporting 82,318 troops deployed in 15 missions around the world. UN peace operations are funded by assessments, using a formula derived from the regular funding scale that includes a weighted surcharge for the five permanent Security Council members, who must approve all peacekeeping operations. This surcharge serves to offset discounted peacekeeping assessment rates for less developed countries. In 2017, the top 8 providers of assessed financial contributions to Peacekeeping operations were the United States (28.47%), China (10.25%), Japan (9.68%), Germany (6.39%), France (6.28%), United Kingdom (5.77%), Russian Federation (3.99%) and Italy (3.75%). | Which country was the second most important provider of assessed financial contributions to Peacekeeping operations? | 679d7dcb-391e-4443-b099-a59daa6fd838 | {
"number": "",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [
"China"
],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [],
"date": [],
"spans": [],
"worker_id": [],
"hit_id": []
} |
history_3004 | A large share of the UNs expenditure addresses its core mission of peace and security, and this budget is assessed separately from the main organizational budget. The peacekeeping budget for the 2015-16 fiscal year was $8.27 billion, supporting 82,318 troops deployed in 15 missions around the world. UN peace operations are funded by assessments, using a formula derived from the regular funding scale that includes a weighted surcharge for the five permanent Security Council members, who must approve all peacekeeping operations. This surcharge serves to offset discounted peacekeeping assessment rates for less developed countries. In 2017, the top 8 providers of assessed financial contributions to Peacekeeping operations were the United States (28.47%), China (10.25%), Japan (9.68%), Germany (6.39%), France (6.28%), United Kingdom (5.77%), Russian Federation (3.99%) and Italy (3.75%). | Which country was the third most important provider of assessed financial contributions to Peacekeeping operations? | bac7dd38-19e9-4bac-be80-52a0393b1734 | {
"number": "",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [
"Japan"
],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [],
"date": [],
"spans": [],
"worker_id": [],
"hit_id": []
} |
history_3004 | A large share of the UNs expenditure addresses its core mission of peace and security, and this budget is assessed separately from the main organizational budget. The peacekeeping budget for the 2015-16 fiscal year was $8.27 billion, supporting 82,318 troops deployed in 15 missions around the world. UN peace operations are funded by assessments, using a formula derived from the regular funding scale that includes a weighted surcharge for the five permanent Security Council members, who must approve all peacekeeping operations. This surcharge serves to offset discounted peacekeeping assessment rates for less developed countries. In 2017, the top 8 providers of assessed financial contributions to Peacekeeping operations were the United States (28.47%), China (10.25%), Japan (9.68%), Germany (6.39%), France (6.28%), United Kingdom (5.77%), Russian Federation (3.99%) and Italy (3.75%). | Which country was the fourth most important provider of assessed financial contributions to Peacekeeping operations? | 5b03d033-23d7-42c0-ae91-0d69b3848902 | {
"number": "",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [
"Germany"
],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [],
"date": [],
"spans": [],
"worker_id": [],
"hit_id": []
} |
history_3004 | A large share of the UNs expenditure addresses its core mission of peace and security, and this budget is assessed separately from the main organizational budget. The peacekeeping budget for the 2015-16 fiscal year was $8.27 billion, supporting 82,318 troops deployed in 15 missions around the world. UN peace operations are funded by assessments, using a formula derived from the regular funding scale that includes a weighted surcharge for the five permanent Security Council members, who must approve all peacekeeping operations. This surcharge serves to offset discounted peacekeeping assessment rates for less developed countries. In 2017, the top 8 providers of assessed financial contributions to Peacekeeping operations were the United States (28.47%), China (10.25%), Japan (9.68%), Germany (6.39%), France (6.28%), United Kingdom (5.77%), Russian Federation (3.99%) and Italy (3.75%). | Which country was the fifth most important provider of assessed financial contributions to Peacekeeping operations? | fc921de4-79c8-4391-badc-88d69f081bab | {
"number": "",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [
"France"
],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [],
"date": [],
"spans": [],
"worker_id": [],
"hit_id": []
} |
history_3004 | A large share of the UNs expenditure addresses its core mission of peace and security, and this budget is assessed separately from the main organizational budget. The peacekeeping budget for the 2015-16 fiscal year was $8.27 billion, supporting 82,318 troops deployed in 15 missions around the world. UN peace operations are funded by assessments, using a formula derived from the regular funding scale that includes a weighted surcharge for the five permanent Security Council members, who must approve all peacekeeping operations. This surcharge serves to offset discounted peacekeeping assessment rates for less developed countries. In 2017, the top 8 providers of assessed financial contributions to Peacekeeping operations were the United States (28.47%), China (10.25%), Japan (9.68%), Germany (6.39%), France (6.28%), United Kingdom (5.77%), Russian Federation (3.99%) and Italy (3.75%). | Which country was the sixth most important provider of assessed financial contributions to Peacekeeping operations? | 518f9819-9344-49db-a669-d04a30525676 | {
"number": "",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [
"United Kingdom"
],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [],
"date": [],
"spans": [],
"worker_id": [],
"hit_id": []
} |
history_3004 | A large share of the UNs expenditure addresses its core mission of peace and security, and this budget is assessed separately from the main organizational budget. The peacekeeping budget for the 2015-16 fiscal year was $8.27 billion, supporting 82,318 troops deployed in 15 missions around the world. UN peace operations are funded by assessments, using a formula derived from the regular funding scale that includes a weighted surcharge for the five permanent Security Council members, who must approve all peacekeeping operations. This surcharge serves to offset discounted peacekeeping assessment rates for less developed countries. In 2017, the top 8 providers of assessed financial contributions to Peacekeeping operations were the United States (28.47%), China (10.25%), Japan (9.68%), Germany (6.39%), France (6.28%), United Kingdom (5.77%), Russian Federation (3.99%) and Italy (3.75%). | Which country was the seventh most important provider of assessed financial contributions to Peacekeeping operations? | 83f92d2d-09eb-4ba7-bd42-fdd6ebd140d6 | {
"number": "",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [
"Russian Federation"
],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [],
"date": [],
"spans": [],
"worker_id": [],
"hit_id": []
} |
history_3004 | A large share of the UNs expenditure addresses its core mission of peace and security, and this budget is assessed separately from the main organizational budget. The peacekeeping budget for the 2015-16 fiscal year was $8.27 billion, supporting 82,318 troops deployed in 15 missions around the world. UN peace operations are funded by assessments, using a formula derived from the regular funding scale that includes a weighted surcharge for the five permanent Security Council members, who must approve all peacekeeping operations. This surcharge serves to offset discounted peacekeeping assessment rates for less developed countries. In 2017, the top 8 providers of assessed financial contributions to Peacekeeping operations were the United States (28.47%), China (10.25%), Japan (9.68%), Germany (6.39%), France (6.28%), United Kingdom (5.77%), Russian Federation (3.99%) and Italy (3.75%). | Which country was the eighth most important provider of assessed financial contributions to Peacekeeping operations? | fcc1dd4b-66cc-481e-847e-88e58edd6512 | {
"number": "",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [
"Italy"
],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [],
"date": [],
"spans": [],
"worker_id": [],
"hit_id": []
} |
history_2799 | There are 13,304 whites of non-Hispanic origin living in San Juan; 10,571 blacks of non-Hispanic origin living in San Juan. Non-Hispanic whites and blacks form 3.2% and 2.6% of San Juans population respectively. There are also approximately 562 Asians of non-Hispanic origin in San Juan; they make up only 0.1% of the population. However, Asians of Hispanic and non-Hispanic origin together number at 6,342. The vast majority of Asians in San Juan are of Chinese American descent; of the 6,342 Asians, 4,928 are Chinese. Chinese comprise 1.4% of the population. The only other sizable Asian group in San Juan are Indian Americans; there are 698 people of Indian descent in the city, forming 0.2% of the population. There are very small numbers of people of Filipino American, Japanese American, and Vietnamese American ancestry; none of these groups number more than 100 members. | How many whites, blacks and Asians of non-hispanic origin live in San Juan? | 2988f9a2-20bd-4ecf-87cf-d9d97002355d | {
"number": "24437",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [],
"date": [],
"spans": [],
"worker_id": [],
"hit_id": []
} |
history_2799 | There are 13,304 whites of non-Hispanic origin living in San Juan; 10,571 blacks of non-Hispanic origin living in San Juan. Non-Hispanic whites and blacks form 3.2% and 2.6% of San Juans population respectively. There are also approximately 562 Asians of non-Hispanic origin in San Juan; they make up only 0.1% of the population. However, Asians of Hispanic and non-Hispanic origin together number at 6,342. The vast majority of Asians in San Juan are of Chinese American descent; of the 6,342 Asians, 4,928 are Chinese. Chinese comprise 1.4% of the population. The only other sizable Asian group in San Juan are Indian Americans; there are 698 people of Indian descent in the city, forming 0.2% of the population. There are very small numbers of people of Filipino American, Japanese American, and Vietnamese American ancestry; none of these groups number more than 100 members. | How many Asians in San Juan are of Hispanic origin? | 1f553d0a-606a-4d4e-8416-e374ff6cd2fc | {
"number": "5780",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [],
"date": [],
"spans": [],
"worker_id": [],
"hit_id": []
} |
history_2799 | There are 13,304 whites of non-Hispanic origin living in San Juan; 10,571 blacks of non-Hispanic origin living in San Juan. Non-Hispanic whites and blacks form 3.2% and 2.6% of San Juans population respectively. There are also approximately 562 Asians of non-Hispanic origin in San Juan; they make up only 0.1% of the population. However, Asians of Hispanic and non-Hispanic origin together number at 6,342. The vast majority of Asians in San Juan are of Chinese American descent; of the 6,342 Asians, 4,928 are Chinese. Chinese comprise 1.4% of the population. The only other sizable Asian group in San Juan are Indian Americans; there are 698 people of Indian descent in the city, forming 0.2% of the population. There are very small numbers of people of Filipino American, Japanese American, and Vietnamese American ancestry; none of these groups number more than 100 members. | Which non hispanic group has the second largest number of people in San Juan? | 99574252-11ba-471f-ab91-95b17b179314 | {
"number": "",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [
"blacks"
],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [],
"date": [],
"spans": [],
"worker_id": [],
"hit_id": []
} |
history_2799 | There are 13,304 whites of non-Hispanic origin living in San Juan; 10,571 blacks of non-Hispanic origin living in San Juan. Non-Hispanic whites and blacks form 3.2% and 2.6% of San Juans population respectively. There are also approximately 562 Asians of non-Hispanic origin in San Juan; they make up only 0.1% of the population. However, Asians of Hispanic and non-Hispanic origin together number at 6,342. The vast majority of Asians in San Juan are of Chinese American descent; of the 6,342 Asians, 4,928 are Chinese. Chinese comprise 1.4% of the population. The only other sizable Asian group in San Juan are Indian Americans; there are 698 people of Indian descent in the city, forming 0.2% of the population. There are very small numbers of people of Filipino American, Japanese American, and Vietnamese American ancestry; none of these groups number more than 100 members. | Of the Asians in San Juan, how many of them are not Chinese? | 4393e2d4-46bf-45a7-947d-c3c13fca5497 | {
"number": "1414",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [],
"date": [],
"spans": [],
"worker_id": [],
"hit_id": []
} |
history_2799 | There are 13,304 whites of non-Hispanic origin living in San Juan; 10,571 blacks of non-Hispanic origin living in San Juan. Non-Hispanic whites and blacks form 3.2% and 2.6% of San Juans population respectively. There are also approximately 562 Asians of non-Hispanic origin in San Juan; they make up only 0.1% of the population. However, Asians of Hispanic and non-Hispanic origin together number at 6,342. The vast majority of Asians in San Juan are of Chinese American descent; of the 6,342 Asians, 4,928 are Chinese. Chinese comprise 1.4% of the population. The only other sizable Asian group in San Juan are Indian Americans; there are 698 people of Indian descent in the city, forming 0.2% of the population. There are very small numbers of people of Filipino American, Japanese American, and Vietnamese American ancestry; none of these groups number more than 100 members. | How many of the Asians were not of Chinese descent? | da002b09-11fd-4c84-b40b-7abf2f28cf90 | {
"number": "1414",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [],
"date": [],
"spans": [],
"worker_id": [],
"hit_id": []
} |
history_2799 | There are 13,304 whites of non-Hispanic origin living in San Juan; 10,571 blacks of non-Hispanic origin living in San Juan. Non-Hispanic whites and blacks form 3.2% and 2.6% of San Juans population respectively. There are also approximately 562 Asians of non-Hispanic origin in San Juan; they make up only 0.1% of the population. However, Asians of Hispanic and non-Hispanic origin together number at 6,342. The vast majority of Asians in San Juan are of Chinese American descent; of the 6,342 Asians, 4,928 are Chinese. Chinese comprise 1.4% of the population. The only other sizable Asian group in San Juan are Indian Americans; there are 698 people of Indian descent in the city, forming 0.2% of the population. There are very small numbers of people of Filipino American, Japanese American, and Vietnamese American ancestry; none of these groups number more than 100 members. | How many more Indian Americans are there than Chinese? | e4365140-b575-4ebd-b620-c9baee1a9b7f | {
"number": "4230",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [],
"date": [],
"spans": [],
"worker_id": [],
"hit_id": []
} |
history_2799 | There are 13,304 whites of non-Hispanic origin living in San Juan; 10,571 blacks of non-Hispanic origin living in San Juan. Non-Hispanic whites and blacks form 3.2% and 2.6% of San Juans population respectively. There are also approximately 562 Asians of non-Hispanic origin in San Juan; they make up only 0.1% of the population. However, Asians of Hispanic and non-Hispanic origin together number at 6,342. The vast majority of Asians in San Juan are of Chinese American descent; of the 6,342 Asians, 4,928 are Chinese. Chinese comprise 1.4% of the population. The only other sizable Asian group in San Juan are Indian Americans; there are 698 people of Indian descent in the city, forming 0.2% of the population. There are very small numbers of people of Filipino American, Japanese American, and Vietnamese American ancestry; none of these groups number more than 100 members. | How many groups do not make up more than 100 people of the San Juan population? | 41db24ff-bc52-411e-b5f0-e8e61dae8455 | {
"number": "3",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [],
"date": [],
"spans": [],
"worker_id": [],
"hit_id": []
} |
history_2799 | There are 13,304 whites of non-Hispanic origin living in San Juan; 10,571 blacks of non-Hispanic origin living in San Juan. Non-Hispanic whites and blacks form 3.2% and 2.6% of San Juans population respectively. There are also approximately 562 Asians of non-Hispanic origin in San Juan; they make up only 0.1% of the population. However, Asians of Hispanic and non-Hispanic origin together number at 6,342. The vast majority of Asians in San Juan are of Chinese American descent; of the 6,342 Asians, 4,928 are Chinese. Chinese comprise 1.4% of the population. The only other sizable Asian group in San Juan are Indian Americans; there are 698 people of Indian descent in the city, forming 0.2% of the population. There are very small numbers of people of Filipino American, Japanese American, and Vietnamese American ancestry; none of these groups number more than 100 members. | How many more people living in San Juan were whites of non-Hispanic origin compared to blacks of non-Hispanic origin? | 2a344946-da90-40ef-8f2b-0fd5a958c9e6 | {
"number": "2733",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [],
"date": [],
"spans": [],
"worker_id": [],
"hit_id": []
} |
history_2799 | There are 13,304 whites of non-Hispanic origin living in San Juan; 10,571 blacks of non-Hispanic origin living in San Juan. Non-Hispanic whites and blacks form 3.2% and 2.6% of San Juans population respectively. There are also approximately 562 Asians of non-Hispanic origin in San Juan; they make up only 0.1% of the population. However, Asians of Hispanic and non-Hispanic origin together number at 6,342. The vast majority of Asians in San Juan are of Chinese American descent; of the 6,342 Asians, 4,928 are Chinese. Chinese comprise 1.4% of the population. The only other sizable Asian group in San Juan are Indian Americans; there are 698 people of Indian descent in the city, forming 0.2% of the population. There are very small numbers of people of Filipino American, Japanese American, and Vietnamese American ancestry; none of these groups number more than 100 members. | How many Asians living in San Juan are not Chinese? | adab4ab3-7c6b-4d9d-8284-22c85efcf562 | {
"number": "1414",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [],
"date": [],
"spans": [],
"worker_id": [],
"hit_id": []
} |
history_2799 | There are 13,304 whites of non-Hispanic origin living in San Juan; 10,571 blacks of non-Hispanic origin living in San Juan. Non-Hispanic whites and blacks form 3.2% and 2.6% of San Juans population respectively. There are also approximately 562 Asians of non-Hispanic origin in San Juan; they make up only 0.1% of the population. However, Asians of Hispanic and non-Hispanic origin together number at 6,342. The vast majority of Asians in San Juan are of Chinese American descent; of the 6,342 Asians, 4,928 are Chinese. Chinese comprise 1.4% of the population. The only other sizable Asian group in San Juan are Indian Americans; there are 698 people of Indian descent in the city, forming 0.2% of the population. There are very small numbers of people of Filipino American, Japanese American, and Vietnamese American ancestry; none of these groups number more than 100 members. | Which group of people are there more of living in San Juan, Chinese Americans or Indian Americans? | f984aacc-31a0-4eaf-9957-5914d1864183 | {
"number": "",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [
"Chinese American"
],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [],
"date": [],
"spans": [],
"worker_id": [],
"hit_id": []
} |
history_2799 | There are 13,304 whites of non-Hispanic origin living in San Juan; 10,571 blacks of non-Hispanic origin living in San Juan. Non-Hispanic whites and blacks form 3.2% and 2.6% of San Juans population respectively. There are also approximately 562 Asians of non-Hispanic origin in San Juan; they make up only 0.1% of the population. However, Asians of Hispanic and non-Hispanic origin together number at 6,342. The vast majority of Asians in San Juan are of Chinese American descent; of the 6,342 Asians, 4,928 are Chinese. Chinese comprise 1.4% of the population. The only other sizable Asian group in San Juan are Indian Americans; there are 698 people of Indian descent in the city, forming 0.2% of the population. There are very small numbers of people of Filipino American, Japanese American, and Vietnamese American ancestry; none of these groups number more than 100 members. | How many more non-hispanic blacks are there living in San Juan compared to Asians of non-Hispanic origin, by percent? | 81943bba-7f09-4755-9510-b902d51b089c | {
"number": "2.5",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [],
"date": [],
"spans": [],
"worker_id": [],
"hit_id": []
} |
history_2842 | With the city having 129,401 households, 108,815 (84.1%) were occupied while 20,586 (15.9%) were not occupied. With 108,815 of the population in households, 3,888 (1.6%) lived in non-institutionalized group-quarters and 2,719 (1.1%) were institutionalized. There were 108,815 households, out of which 23,304 (21.4%) had children under the age of 18 living in them, 37,847 (34.8%) were Marriage living together, 16,425 (15.1%) had a female householder with no husband present, 4,849 (4.5%) had a male householder with no wife present. There were 9,453 (3.9%) unmarried partnerships. 39,397 households (36.2%) were made up of individuals and 28,267 (26.0%) had someone living alone who was 65 years of age or older. The average household size was 2.19. Out of 108,815 occupied households, Family (U.S. Census) made up 59,121 (54.3%) while non-families made up 49,694 (45.7%); the average family size was 2.88. The median age of the city was 41.6 years. | How many more family households were there than non-family households? | 614a8316-1c67-43e8-bf3d-96953b6bc1e5 | {
"number": "9427",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [],
"date": [],
"spans": [],
"worker_id": [],
"hit_id": []
} |
history_2842 | With the city having 129,401 households, 108,815 (84.1%) were occupied while 20,586 (15.9%) were not occupied. With 108,815 of the population in households, 3,888 (1.6%) lived in non-institutionalized group-quarters and 2,719 (1.1%) were institutionalized. There were 108,815 households, out of which 23,304 (21.4%) had children under the age of 18 living in them, 37,847 (34.8%) were Marriage living together, 16,425 (15.1%) had a female householder with no husband present, 4,849 (4.5%) had a male householder with no wife present. There were 9,453 (3.9%) unmarried partnerships. 39,397 households (36.2%) were made up of individuals and 28,267 (26.0%) had someone living alone who was 65 years of age or older. The average household size was 2.19. Out of 108,815 occupied households, Family (U.S. Census) made up 59,121 (54.3%) while non-families made up 49,694 (45.7%); the average family size was 2.88. The median age of the city was 41.6 years. | How many more non-institutionalized people were there than institutionalized people? | d431b151-b9e3-4f0a-939e-83bcb5dfa2bd | {
"number": "1169",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [],
"date": [],
"spans": [],
"worker_id": [],
"hit_id": []
} |
history_2842 | With the city having 129,401 households, 108,815 (84.1%) were occupied while 20,586 (15.9%) were not occupied. With 108,815 of the population in households, 3,888 (1.6%) lived in non-institutionalized group-quarters and 2,719 (1.1%) were institutionalized. There were 108,815 households, out of which 23,304 (21.4%) had children under the age of 18 living in them, 37,847 (34.8%) were Marriage living together, 16,425 (15.1%) had a female householder with no husband present, 4,849 (4.5%) had a male householder with no wife present. There were 9,453 (3.9%) unmarried partnerships. 39,397 households (36.2%) were made up of individuals and 28,267 (26.0%) had someone living alone who was 65 years of age or older. The average household size was 2.19. Out of 108,815 occupied households, Family (U.S. Census) made up 59,121 (54.3%) while non-families made up 49,694 (45.7%); the average family size was 2.88. The median age of the city was 41.6 years. | How many households did not have children under the age of 18 living with them? | 4690bbcc-589d-4ded-bd52-3fe1a1d94888 | {
"number": "85511",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [],
"date": [],
"spans": [],
"worker_id": [],
"hit_id": []
} |
history_2842 | With the city having 129,401 households, 108,815 (84.1%) were occupied while 20,586 (15.9%) were not occupied. With 108,815 of the population in households, 3,888 (1.6%) lived in non-institutionalized group-quarters and 2,719 (1.1%) were institutionalized. There were 108,815 households, out of which 23,304 (21.4%) had children under the age of 18 living in them, 37,847 (34.8%) were Marriage living together, 16,425 (15.1%) had a female householder with no husband present, 4,849 (4.5%) had a male householder with no wife present. There were 9,453 (3.9%) unmarried partnerships. 39,397 households (36.2%) were made up of individuals and 28,267 (26.0%) had someone living alone who was 65 years of age or older. The average household size was 2.19. Out of 108,815 occupied households, Family (U.S. Census) made up 59,121 (54.3%) while non-families made up 49,694 (45.7%); the average family size was 2.88. The median age of the city was 41.6 years. | How many more households were married and living together than there were female householders with no husband present? | ba9210fb-ab91-4825-aabf-c76edbe517ef | {
"number": "21422",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [],
"date": [],
"spans": [],
"worker_id": [],
"hit_id": []
} |
history_2842 | With the city having 129,401 households, 108,815 (84.1%) were occupied while 20,586 (15.9%) were not occupied. With 108,815 of the population in households, 3,888 (1.6%) lived in non-institutionalized group-quarters and 2,719 (1.1%) were institutionalized. There were 108,815 households, out of which 23,304 (21.4%) had children under the age of 18 living in them, 37,847 (34.8%) were Marriage living together, 16,425 (15.1%) had a female householder with no husband present, 4,849 (4.5%) had a male householder with no wife present. There were 9,453 (3.9%) unmarried partnerships. 39,397 households (36.2%) were made up of individuals and 28,267 (26.0%) had someone living alone who was 65 years of age or older. The average household size was 2.19. Out of 108,815 occupied households, Family (U.S. Census) made up 59,121 (54.3%) while non-families made up 49,694 (45.7%); the average family size was 2.88. The median age of the city was 41.6 years. | How many more households were married living together than there were unmarried partnerships? | e15fcd2b-016f-484f-8744-91cbe09d0f0d | {
"number": "6972",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [],
"date": [],
"spans": [],
"worker_id": [],
"hit_id": []
} |
history_2842 | With the city having 129,401 households, 108,815 (84.1%) were occupied while 20,586 (15.9%) were not occupied. With 108,815 of the population in households, 3,888 (1.6%) lived in non-institutionalized group-quarters and 2,719 (1.1%) were institutionalized. There were 108,815 households, out of which 23,304 (21.4%) had children under the age of 18 living in them, 37,847 (34.8%) were Marriage living together, 16,425 (15.1%) had a female householder with no husband present, 4,849 (4.5%) had a male householder with no wife present. There were 9,453 (3.9%) unmarried partnerships. 39,397 households (36.2%) were made up of individuals and 28,267 (26.0%) had someone living alone who was 65 years of age or older. The average household size was 2.19. Out of 108,815 occupied households, Family (U.S. Census) made up 59,121 (54.3%) while non-families made up 49,694 (45.7%); the average family size was 2.88. The median age of the city was 41.6 years. | How many percent of households were not vacant? | 555a420f-45e5-4bef-a5e6-ada409675586 | {
"number": "84.1",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [],
"date": [],
"spans": [],
"worker_id": [],
"hit_id": []
} |
history_2842 | With the city having 129,401 households, 108,815 (84.1%) were occupied while 20,586 (15.9%) were not occupied. With 108,815 of the population in households, 3,888 (1.6%) lived in non-institutionalized group-quarters and 2,719 (1.1%) were institutionalized. There were 108,815 households, out of which 23,304 (21.4%) had children under the age of 18 living in them, 37,847 (34.8%) were Marriage living together, 16,425 (15.1%) had a female householder with no husband present, 4,849 (4.5%) had a male householder with no wife present. There were 9,453 (3.9%) unmarried partnerships. 39,397 households (36.2%) were made up of individuals and 28,267 (26.0%) had someone living alone who was 65 years of age or older. The average household size was 2.19. Out of 108,815 occupied households, Family (U.S. Census) made up 59,121 (54.3%) while non-families made up 49,694 (45.7%); the average family size was 2.88. The median age of the city was 41.6 years. | How many percent of the population did not live in non-institutionalized group-quarters? | a08bd6f2-d8c6-422e-8cea-f7ee1b72c388 | {
"number": "98.4",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [],
"date": [],
"spans": [],
"worker_id": [],
"hit_id": []
} |
history_2842 | With the city having 129,401 households, 108,815 (84.1%) were occupied while 20,586 (15.9%) were not occupied. With 108,815 of the population in households, 3,888 (1.6%) lived in non-institutionalized group-quarters and 2,719 (1.1%) were institutionalized. There were 108,815 households, out of which 23,304 (21.4%) had children under the age of 18 living in them, 37,847 (34.8%) were Marriage living together, 16,425 (15.1%) had a female householder with no husband present, 4,849 (4.5%) had a male householder with no wife present. There were 9,453 (3.9%) unmarried partnerships. 39,397 households (36.2%) were made up of individuals and 28,267 (26.0%) had someone living alone who was 65 years of age or older. The average household size was 2.19. Out of 108,815 occupied households, Family (U.S. Census) made up 59,121 (54.3%) while non-families made up 49,694 (45.7%); the average family size was 2.88. The median age of the city was 41.6 years. | How many percent of the population were not institutionalized? | be99a13b-9cde-46d2-8f24-de0377e9131d | {
"number": "98.9",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [],
"date": [],
"spans": [],
"worker_id": [],
"hit_id": []
} |
history_2842 | With the city having 129,401 households, 108,815 (84.1%) were occupied while 20,586 (15.9%) were not occupied. With 108,815 of the population in households, 3,888 (1.6%) lived in non-institutionalized group-quarters and 2,719 (1.1%) were institutionalized. There were 108,815 households, out of which 23,304 (21.4%) had children under the age of 18 living in them, 37,847 (34.8%) were Marriage living together, 16,425 (15.1%) had a female householder with no husband present, 4,849 (4.5%) had a male householder with no wife present. There were 9,453 (3.9%) unmarried partnerships. 39,397 households (36.2%) were made up of individuals and 28,267 (26.0%) had someone living alone who was 65 years of age or older. The average household size was 2.19. Out of 108,815 occupied households, Family (U.S. Census) made up 59,121 (54.3%) while non-families made up 49,694 (45.7%); the average family size was 2.88. The median age of the city was 41.6 years. | How many percent do not have children under the age of 18 living with them? | ea0a867e-bdfb-4ed9-a3d6-d77594b58eae | {
"number": "78.6",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [],
"date": [],
"spans": [],
"worker_id": [],
"hit_id": []
} |
history_2842 | With the city having 129,401 households, 108,815 (84.1%) were occupied while 20,586 (15.9%) were not occupied. With 108,815 of the population in households, 3,888 (1.6%) lived in non-institutionalized group-quarters and 2,719 (1.1%) were institutionalized. There were 108,815 households, out of which 23,304 (21.4%) had children under the age of 18 living in them, 37,847 (34.8%) were Marriage living together, 16,425 (15.1%) had a female householder with no husband present, 4,849 (4.5%) had a male householder with no wife present. There were 9,453 (3.9%) unmarried partnerships. 39,397 households (36.2%) were made up of individuals and 28,267 (26.0%) had someone living alone who was 65 years of age or older. The average household size was 2.19. Out of 108,815 occupied households, Family (U.S. Census) made up 59,121 (54.3%) while non-families made up 49,694 (45.7%); the average family size was 2.88. The median age of the city was 41.6 years. | How many percent are not married couples living together? | 1a2985d5-1f21-4afb-8205-8ac04725391c | {
"number": "65.2",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [],
"date": [],
"spans": [],
"worker_id": [],
"hit_id": []
} |
history_2842 | With the city having 129,401 households, 108,815 (84.1%) were occupied while 20,586 (15.9%) were not occupied. With 108,815 of the population in households, 3,888 (1.6%) lived in non-institutionalized group-quarters and 2,719 (1.1%) were institutionalized. There were 108,815 households, out of which 23,304 (21.4%) had children under the age of 18 living in them, 37,847 (34.8%) were Marriage living together, 16,425 (15.1%) had a female householder with no husband present, 4,849 (4.5%) had a male householder with no wife present. There were 9,453 (3.9%) unmarried partnerships. 39,397 households (36.2%) were made up of individuals and 28,267 (26.0%) had someone living alone who was 65 years of age or older. The average household size was 2.19. Out of 108,815 occupied households, Family (U.S. Census) made up 59,121 (54.3%) while non-families made up 49,694 (45.7%); the average family size was 2.88. The median age of the city was 41.6 years. | How many percent are not female householder with no husband present? | db29d97c-3005-4d3a-911a-f591843b92e7 | {
"number": "84.9",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [],
"date": [],
"spans": [],
"worker_id": [],
"hit_id": []
} |
history_2842 | With the city having 129,401 households, 108,815 (84.1%) were occupied while 20,586 (15.9%) were not occupied. With 108,815 of the population in households, 3,888 (1.6%) lived in non-institutionalized group-quarters and 2,719 (1.1%) were institutionalized. There were 108,815 households, out of which 23,304 (21.4%) had children under the age of 18 living in them, 37,847 (34.8%) were Marriage living together, 16,425 (15.1%) had a female householder with no husband present, 4,849 (4.5%) had a male householder with no wife present. There were 9,453 (3.9%) unmarried partnerships. 39,397 households (36.2%) were made up of individuals and 28,267 (26.0%) had someone living alone who was 65 years of age or older. The average household size was 2.19. Out of 108,815 occupied households, Family (U.S. Census) made up 59,121 (54.3%) while non-families made up 49,694 (45.7%); the average family size was 2.88. The median age of the city was 41.6 years. | How many percent are not male householder with no wife present? | f9c5029c-afb6-4033-9ef5-088854ca1292 | {
"number": "95.5",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [],
"date": [],
"spans": [],
"worker_id": [],
"hit_id": []
} |
history_2842 | With the city having 129,401 households, 108,815 (84.1%) were occupied while 20,586 (15.9%) were not occupied. With 108,815 of the population in households, 3,888 (1.6%) lived in non-institutionalized group-quarters and 2,719 (1.1%) were institutionalized. There were 108,815 households, out of which 23,304 (21.4%) had children under the age of 18 living in them, 37,847 (34.8%) were Marriage living together, 16,425 (15.1%) had a female householder with no husband present, 4,849 (4.5%) had a male householder with no wife present. There were 9,453 (3.9%) unmarried partnerships. 39,397 households (36.2%) were made up of individuals and 28,267 (26.0%) had someone living alone who was 65 years of age or older. The average household size was 2.19. Out of 108,815 occupied households, Family (U.S. Census) made up 59,121 (54.3%) while non-families made up 49,694 (45.7%); the average family size was 2.88. The median age of the city was 41.6 years. | How many percent are not unmarried partnerships? | 7add5518-7c10-43cc-b71e-a091dbd2bb08 | {
"number": "96.1",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [],
"date": [],
"spans": [],
"worker_id": [],
"hit_id": []
} |
history_2842 | With the city having 129,401 households, 108,815 (84.1%) were occupied while 20,586 (15.9%) were not occupied. With 108,815 of the population in households, 3,888 (1.6%) lived in non-institutionalized group-quarters and 2,719 (1.1%) were institutionalized. There were 108,815 households, out of which 23,304 (21.4%) had children under the age of 18 living in them, 37,847 (34.8%) were Marriage living together, 16,425 (15.1%) had a female householder with no husband present, 4,849 (4.5%) had a male householder with no wife present. There were 9,453 (3.9%) unmarried partnerships. 39,397 households (36.2%) were made up of individuals and 28,267 (26.0%) had someone living alone who was 65 years of age or older. The average household size was 2.19. Out of 108,815 occupied households, Family (U.S. Census) made up 59,121 (54.3%) while non-families made up 49,694 (45.7%); the average family size was 2.88. The median age of the city was 41.6 years. | How many percent are not households made up of individuals? | cc23d9a3-4742-49de-8f3a-ecee3c8fc2ac | {
"number": "63.8",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [],
"date": [],
"spans": [],
"worker_id": [],
"hit_id": []
} |
history_2842 | With the city having 129,401 households, 108,815 (84.1%) were occupied while 20,586 (15.9%) were not occupied. With 108,815 of the population in households, 3,888 (1.6%) lived in non-institutionalized group-quarters and 2,719 (1.1%) were institutionalized. There were 108,815 households, out of which 23,304 (21.4%) had children under the age of 18 living in them, 37,847 (34.8%) were Marriage living together, 16,425 (15.1%) had a female householder with no husband present, 4,849 (4.5%) had a male householder with no wife present. There were 9,453 (3.9%) unmarried partnerships. 39,397 households (36.2%) were made up of individuals and 28,267 (26.0%) had someone living alone who was 65 years of age or older. The average household size was 2.19. Out of 108,815 occupied households, Family (U.S. Census) made up 59,121 (54.3%) while non-families made up 49,694 (45.7%); the average family size was 2.88. The median age of the city was 41.6 years. | How many percent are not someone living alone who was 65 years of age or older? | 15d424e3-83af-4e9f-9e7b-1bbf25ef1fe3 | {
"number": "74",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [],
"date": [],
"spans": [],
"worker_id": [],
"hit_id": []
} |
history_2842 | With the city having 129,401 households, 108,815 (84.1%) were occupied while 20,586 (15.9%) were not occupied. With 108,815 of the population in households, 3,888 (1.6%) lived in non-institutionalized group-quarters and 2,719 (1.1%) were institutionalized. There were 108,815 households, out of which 23,304 (21.4%) had children under the age of 18 living in them, 37,847 (34.8%) were Marriage living together, 16,425 (15.1%) had a female householder with no husband present, 4,849 (4.5%) had a male householder with no wife present. There were 9,453 (3.9%) unmarried partnerships. 39,397 households (36.2%) were made up of individuals and 28,267 (26.0%) had someone living alone who was 65 years of age or older. The average household size was 2.19. Out of 108,815 occupied households, Family (U.S. Census) made up 59,121 (54.3%) while non-families made up 49,694 (45.7%); the average family size was 2.88. The median age of the city was 41.6 years. | How many percent of households were not families? | 0f8699d7-9ebe-49ec-8d7c-2598b9641592 | {
"number": "45.7",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [],
"date": [],
"spans": [],
"worker_id": [],
"hit_id": []
} |
history_2842 | With the city having 129,401 households, 108,815 (84.1%) were occupied while 20,586 (15.9%) were not occupied. With 108,815 of the population in households, 3,888 (1.6%) lived in non-institutionalized group-quarters and 2,719 (1.1%) were institutionalized. There were 108,815 households, out of which 23,304 (21.4%) had children under the age of 18 living in them, 37,847 (34.8%) were Marriage living together, 16,425 (15.1%) had a female householder with no husband present, 4,849 (4.5%) had a male householder with no wife present. There were 9,453 (3.9%) unmarried partnerships. 39,397 households (36.2%) were made up of individuals and 28,267 (26.0%) had someone living alone who was 65 years of age or older. The average household size was 2.19. Out of 108,815 occupied households, Family (U.S. Census) made up 59,121 (54.3%) while non-families made up 49,694 (45.7%); the average family size was 2.88. The median age of the city was 41.6 years. | How many percent of households were not non-families? | 1f76bc49-b72b-4fd9-84c1-61507ba360af | {
"number": "54.3",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [],
"date": [],
"spans": [],
"worker_id": [],
"hit_id": []
} |
history_2631 | According to the book How to Study Television, in 1995 EastEnders cost the BBC £40,000 per episode on average. A 2012 agreement between the BBC, the Writers Guild of Great Britain and the Personal Managers Association set out the pay rate for EastEnders scripts as £137.70 per minute of transmission time (£4,131 for 30 minutes), which is 85 per cent of the rate for scripts for other BBC television series. The writers would be paid 75 per cent of that fee for any repeats of the episode. In 2011, it was reported that actors receive a per-episode fee of between £400 and £1,200, and are guaranteed a certain number of episodes per year, perhaps as few as 30 or as many as 100, therefore annual salaries could range from £12,000 to £200,000 depending on the popularity of a character. Some actors salaries were leaked in 2006, revealing that Natalie Cassidy (Sonia Fowler) was paid £150,000, Cliff Parisi (Minty Peterson) received £220,000, Barbara Windsor (Peggy Mitchell) and Steve McFadden (Phil Mitchell) each received £360,000 and Wendy Richard (Pauline Fowler) had a salary of £370,000. In 2017, it was revealed that Danny Dyer (Mick Carter) and Adam Woodyatt (Ian Beale) were the highest-paid actors in EastEnders, earning between £200,000 and £249,999, followed by Laurie Brett (Jane Beale), Letitia Dean (Sharon Watts), Tameka Empson (Kim Fox), Linda Henry (Shirley Carter), Scott Maslen (Jack Branning), Diane Parish (Denise Fox), Gillian Taylforth (Kathy Beale) and Lacey Turner (Stacey Slater), earning between £150,000 and £199,999. | Which actor was paid more, Natalie Cassidey or Barbara Windsor? | 53de03c2-a2c2-41a0-9677-1094e7045ff4 | {
"number": "",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [
"Barbara Windsor"
],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [],
"date": [],
"spans": [],
"worker_id": [],
"hit_id": []
} |
history_2631 | According to the book How to Study Television, in 1995 EastEnders cost the BBC £40,000 per episode on average. A 2012 agreement between the BBC, the Writers Guild of Great Britain and the Personal Managers Association set out the pay rate for EastEnders scripts as £137.70 per minute of transmission time (£4,131 for 30 minutes), which is 85 per cent of the rate for scripts for other BBC television series. The writers would be paid 75 per cent of that fee for any repeats of the episode. In 2011, it was reported that actors receive a per-episode fee of between £400 and £1,200, and are guaranteed a certain number of episodes per year, perhaps as few as 30 or as many as 100, therefore annual salaries could range from £12,000 to £200,000 depending on the popularity of a character. Some actors salaries were leaked in 2006, revealing that Natalie Cassidy (Sonia Fowler) was paid £150,000, Cliff Parisi (Minty Peterson) received £220,000, Barbara Windsor (Peggy Mitchell) and Steve McFadden (Phil Mitchell) each received £360,000 and Wendy Richard (Pauline Fowler) had a salary of £370,000. In 2017, it was revealed that Danny Dyer (Mick Carter) and Adam Woodyatt (Ian Beale) were the highest-paid actors in EastEnders, earning between £200,000 and £249,999, followed by Laurie Brett (Jane Beale), Letitia Dean (Sharon Watts), Tameka Empson (Kim Fox), Linda Henry (Shirley Carter), Scott Maslen (Jack Branning), Diane Parish (Denise Fox), Gillian Taylforth (Kathy Beale) and Lacey Turner (Stacey Slater), earning between £150,000 and £199,999. | Which actors recieved less than £250,000 in 2006? | 98c98899-7379-4bd4-aa8a-0d99b0461194 | {
"number": "",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [
"Natalie Cassidy",
"Cliff Parisi"
],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [],
"date": [],
"spans": [],
"worker_id": [],
"hit_id": []
} |
history_3185 | In the US, the average annual inflation rate from 1900 to 1970 was approximately 2.5%. From 1970-1979, however, the average rate was 7.06%, and topped out at 13.29% in December 1979. This period is also known for "stagflation", a phenomenon in which inflation and unemployment steadily increased. It led to double-digit interest rates that rose to unprecedented levels (above 12% per year). The prime rate hit 21.5 in December 1980, the highest in history. A rising cost of housing was reflected in the average price of a new home in the U.S. The average price of a new home in the U.S. was $23,450 in 1970 up to $68,700 by 1980. By the time of 1980, when U.S. President Jimmy Carter was running for United States presidential election, 1980 against Ronald Reagan, the Misery index (economics) (the sum of the unemployment rate and the inflation rate) had reached an all-time high of 21.98%. The economic problems of the 1970s would result in a sluggish cynicism replacing the optimistic attitudes of the 1950s and 1960s and a distrust of government and technology. Faith in government was at an all-time low in the aftermath of Vietnam and Watergate, as exemplified by the low voter turnout in the 1976 United States presidential election. There was also the 1973-74 stock market crash. | How many percentage points higher was the average annual inflation rate between 1970 to 1979 than 1900 to 1970? | 1f30e05d-e8a5-4b3b-8cea-e447927e8b48 | {
"number": "4.56",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [],
"date": [],
"spans": [],
"worker_id": [],
"hit_id": []
} |
history_4095 | Of the built up area, industrial buildings made up 1.7% of the total area while housing and buildings made up 10.7% and transportation infrastructure made up 7.3%. Power and water infrastructure as well as other special developed areas made up 3.5% of the area while parks, green belts and sports fields made up 1.5%. Out of the forested land, 38.8% of the total land area is heavily forested and 1.2% is covered with orchards or small clusters of trees. Of the agricultural land, 22.0% is used for growing crops and 12.1% is pastures. Of the water in the municipality, 0.2% is in lakes and 0.6% is in rivers and streams. | How many percent of the build up area were not industrial buildings? | 3b80c26d-5880-411a-a8bd-bc31cb6d18ea | {
"number": "98.3",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [],
"date": [],
"spans": [],
"worker_id": [],
"hit_id": []
} |
history_4095 | Of the built up area, industrial buildings made up 1.7% of the total area while housing and buildings made up 10.7% and transportation infrastructure made up 7.3%. Power and water infrastructure as well as other special developed areas made up 3.5% of the area while parks, green belts and sports fields made up 1.5%. Out of the forested land, 38.8% of the total land area is heavily forested and 1.2% is covered with orchards or small clusters of trees. Of the agricultural land, 22.0% is used for growing crops and 12.1% is pastures. Of the water in the municipality, 0.2% is in lakes and 0.6% is in rivers and streams. | How many percent higher was housing and building than industrial buildings and transportation infrastructure? | b3985790-e73d-4f03-b288-c200401c6de1 | {
"number": "1.7",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [],
"date": [],
"spans": [],
"worker_id": [],
"hit_id": []
} |
history_4095 | Of the built up area, industrial buildings made up 1.7% of the total area while housing and buildings made up 10.7% and transportation infrastructure made up 7.3%. Power and water infrastructure as well as other special developed areas made up 3.5% of the area while parks, green belts and sports fields made up 1.5%. Out of the forested land, 38.8% of the total land area is heavily forested and 1.2% is covered with orchards or small clusters of trees. Of the agricultural land, 22.0% is used for growing crops and 12.1% is pastures. Of the water in the municipality, 0.2% is in lakes and 0.6% is in rivers and streams. | How many percent higher were housing and buildings over industrial buildings and water and power infrastructures? | d18ed3b1-a35c-4a3a-844c-20bff85aa7dc | {
"number": "5.5",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [],
"date": [],
"spans": [],
"worker_id": [],
"hit_id": []
} |
history_4095 | Of the built up area, industrial buildings made up 1.7% of the total area while housing and buildings made up 10.7% and transportation infrastructure made up 7.3%. Power and water infrastructure as well as other special developed areas made up 3.5% of the area while parks, green belts and sports fields made up 1.5%. Out of the forested land, 38.8% of the total land area is heavily forested and 1.2% is covered with orchards or small clusters of trees. Of the agricultural land, 22.0% is used for growing crops and 12.1% is pastures. Of the water in the municipality, 0.2% is in lakes and 0.6% is in rivers and streams. | How many total percent was industrial buildings, water, power and transportation infrastructure? | 0ec0b0e9-510e-42f4-a0cd-3d23d1b0cae4 | {
"number": "12.5",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [],
"date": [],
"spans": [],
"worker_id": [],
"hit_id": []
} |
history_3715 | The Germans lost 9,860 men, with 1,310 killed, 6,443 wounded and 2,107 missing. The French Army of Châlons suffered 122,000 casualties, including 3,220 killed, 14,811 wounded and 104,000 captured along with 558 guns. The French army lost a further 1,000 wagons and 6,000 horses to the Germans. | How many more men have the French lost? | a08c39fe-4042-44bd-9e81-e0fc08693977 | {
"number": "112140",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [],
"date": [],
"spans": [],
"worker_id": [],
"hit_id": []
} |
history_2914 | On 10 December 1916, his twenty-fifth birthday, Alexander became second-in-command (2-i-c) of the 1st Battalion, Irish Guards as an acting major. By May, he was briefly acting CO of the 1st Battalion, as an acting Lieutenant colonel (United Kingdom), while still only a substantive captain. He became a permanent major on 1 August 1917 and was again promoted acting lieutenant colonel, this time confirmed as CO of the 2nd Battalion, Irish Guards, on 15 October. Alexander commanded his battalion at Battle of Passchendaele, where he was slightly wounded, then at Bourlon Wood (part of the Battle of Cambrai (1917)), where his battalion suffered 320 casualties out of 400 men. Alexander, between 23 and 30 March 1918, had to assume command of the 4th Guards Brigade (United Kingdom), during the British retreat from the German Army (German Empire)s Spring Offensive. He once again commanded the 2nd Battalion, Irish Guards at Hazebrouck in April 1918, where it took such severe casualties that it saw no further action. Still an acting lieutenant colonel, he then commanded a corps infantry school in October 1918, a month before the war ended on Armistice of 11 November 1918. | What positions did Alexander hold in the 1st Battalion? | a7769bfb-ec99-4ffc-bede-0e6442cea757 | {
"number": "",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [
"second-in-command",
"acting CO"
],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [],
"date": [],
"spans": [],
"worker_id": [],
"hit_id": []
} |
history_2914 | On 10 December 1916, his twenty-fifth birthday, Alexander became second-in-command (2-i-c) of the 1st Battalion, Irish Guards as an acting major. By May, he was briefly acting CO of the 1st Battalion, as an acting Lieutenant colonel (United Kingdom), while still only a substantive captain. He became a permanent major on 1 August 1917 and was again promoted acting lieutenant colonel, this time confirmed as CO of the 2nd Battalion, Irish Guards, on 15 October. Alexander commanded his battalion at Battle of Passchendaele, where he was slightly wounded, then at Bourlon Wood (part of the Battle of Cambrai (1917)), where his battalion suffered 320 casualties out of 400 men. Alexander, between 23 and 30 March 1918, had to assume command of the 4th Guards Brigade (United Kingdom), during the British retreat from the German Army (German Empire)s Spring Offensive. He once again commanded the 2nd Battalion, Irish Guards at Hazebrouck in April 1918, where it took such severe casualties that it saw no further action. Still an acting lieutenant colonel, he then commanded a corps infantry school in October 1918, a month before the war ended on Armistice of 11 November 1918. | Which battalions was Alexander with during the war? | 2ee2c149-6e82-4175-981b-f66dd857ee0b | {
"number": "",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [
"1st Battalion, Irish Guards",
"2nd Battalion, Irish Guards"
],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [],
"date": [],
"spans": [],
"worker_id": [],
"hit_id": []
} |
history_2914 | On 10 December 1916, his twenty-fifth birthday, Alexander became second-in-command (2-i-c) of the 1st Battalion, Irish Guards as an acting major. By May, he was briefly acting CO of the 1st Battalion, as an acting Lieutenant colonel (United Kingdom), while still only a substantive captain. He became a permanent major on 1 August 1917 and was again promoted acting lieutenant colonel, this time confirmed as CO of the 2nd Battalion, Irish Guards, on 15 October. Alexander commanded his battalion at Battle of Passchendaele, where he was slightly wounded, then at Bourlon Wood (part of the Battle of Cambrai (1917)), where his battalion suffered 320 casualties out of 400 men. Alexander, between 23 and 30 March 1918, had to assume command of the 4th Guards Brigade (United Kingdom), during the British retreat from the German Army (German Empire)s Spring Offensive. He once again commanded the 2nd Battalion, Irish Guards at Hazebrouck in April 1918, where it took such severe casualties that it saw no further action. Still an acting lieutenant colonel, he then commanded a corps infantry school in October 1918, a month before the war ended on Armistice of 11 November 1918. | How many months after his twenty-fifth birthday did Alexander become a major? | 8dc6ea93-da85-4f2d-9604-7b6ec43badf4 | {
"number": "8",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [],
"date": [],
"spans": [],
"worker_id": [],
"hit_id": []
} |
history_2914 | On 10 December 1916, his twenty-fifth birthday, Alexander became second-in-command (2-i-c) of the 1st Battalion, Irish Guards as an acting major. By May, he was briefly acting CO of the 1st Battalion, as an acting Lieutenant colonel (United Kingdom), while still only a substantive captain. He became a permanent major on 1 August 1917 and was again promoted acting lieutenant colonel, this time confirmed as CO of the 2nd Battalion, Irish Guards, on 15 October. Alexander commanded his battalion at Battle of Passchendaele, where he was slightly wounded, then at Bourlon Wood (part of the Battle of Cambrai (1917)), where his battalion suffered 320 casualties out of 400 men. Alexander, between 23 and 30 March 1918, had to assume command of the 4th Guards Brigade (United Kingdom), during the British retreat from the German Army (German Empire)s Spring Offensive. He once again commanded the 2nd Battalion, Irish Guards at Hazebrouck in April 1918, where it took such severe casualties that it saw no further action. Still an acting lieutenant colonel, he then commanded a corps infantry school in October 1918, a month before the war ended on Armistice of 11 November 1918. | Which battles did Alexander command at? | 97e1c208-172f-4797-8ad5-bb902e9dc0c7 | {
"number": "",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [
"Battle of Passchendaele",
"Battle of Cambrai"
],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [],
"date": [],
"spans": [],
"worker_id": [],
"hit_id": []
} |
history_2914 | On 10 December 1916, his twenty-fifth birthday, Alexander became second-in-command (2-i-c) of the 1st Battalion, Irish Guards as an acting major. By May, he was briefly acting CO of the 1st Battalion, as an acting Lieutenant colonel (United Kingdom), while still only a substantive captain. He became a permanent major on 1 August 1917 and was again promoted acting lieutenant colonel, this time confirmed as CO of the 2nd Battalion, Irish Guards, on 15 October. Alexander commanded his battalion at Battle of Passchendaele, where he was slightly wounded, then at Bourlon Wood (part of the Battle of Cambrai (1917)), where his battalion suffered 320 casualties out of 400 men. Alexander, between 23 and 30 March 1918, had to assume command of the 4th Guards Brigade (United Kingdom), during the British retreat from the German Army (German Empire)s Spring Offensive. He once again commanded the 2nd Battalion, Irish Guards at Hazebrouck in April 1918, where it took such severe casualties that it saw no further action. Still an acting lieutenant colonel, he then commanded a corps infantry school in October 1918, a month before the war ended on Armistice of 11 November 1918. | How many of Alexander's men escaped injury at Bourlon Wood? | 257b4a23-9f95-4465-bea0-ad0d43711f82 | {
"number": "80",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [],
"date": [],
"spans": [],
"worker_id": [],
"hit_id": []
} |
history_2914 | On 10 December 1916, his twenty-fifth birthday, Alexander became second-in-command (2-i-c) of the 1st Battalion, Irish Guards as an acting major. By May, he was briefly acting CO of the 1st Battalion, as an acting Lieutenant colonel (United Kingdom), while still only a substantive captain. He became a permanent major on 1 August 1917 and was again promoted acting lieutenant colonel, this time confirmed as CO of the 2nd Battalion, Irish Guards, on 15 October. Alexander commanded his battalion at Battle of Passchendaele, where he was slightly wounded, then at Bourlon Wood (part of the Battle of Cambrai (1917)), where his battalion suffered 320 casualties out of 400 men. Alexander, between 23 and 30 March 1918, had to assume command of the 4th Guards Brigade (United Kingdom), during the British retreat from the German Army (German Empire)s Spring Offensive. He once again commanded the 2nd Battalion, Irish Guards at Hazebrouck in April 1918, where it took such severe casualties that it saw no further action. Still an acting lieutenant colonel, he then commanded a corps infantry school in October 1918, a month before the war ended on Armistice of 11 November 1918. | Which battle occurred first, the Battle of Cambrai or the Battle of Passchendaele? | 65b5e327-9ba0-4d8c-bcea-284f04ed5b78 | {
"number": "",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [
"Battle of Passchendaele"
],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [],
"date": [],
"spans": [],
"worker_id": [],
"hit_id": []
} |
history_2914 | On 10 December 1916, his twenty-fifth birthday, Alexander became second-in-command (2-i-c) of the 1st Battalion, Irish Guards as an acting major. By May, he was briefly acting CO of the 1st Battalion, as an acting Lieutenant colonel (United Kingdom), while still only a substantive captain. He became a permanent major on 1 August 1917 and was again promoted acting lieutenant colonel, this time confirmed as CO of the 2nd Battalion, Irish Guards, on 15 October. Alexander commanded his battalion at Battle of Passchendaele, where he was slightly wounded, then at Bourlon Wood (part of the Battle of Cambrai (1917)), where his battalion suffered 320 casualties out of 400 men. Alexander, between 23 and 30 March 1918, had to assume command of the 4th Guards Brigade (United Kingdom), during the British retreat from the German Army (German Empire)s Spring Offensive. He once again commanded the 2nd Battalion, Irish Guards at Hazebrouck in April 1918, where it took such severe casualties that it saw no further action. Still an acting lieutenant colonel, he then commanded a corps infantry school in October 1918, a month before the war ended on Armistice of 11 November 1918. | For how many days did Alexander assume command of the 4th Guards Brigade (United Kingdom)? | f02fd4ea-be05-4418-9a25-b066bb62386a | {
"number": "7",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [],
"date": [],
"spans": [],
"worker_id": [],
"hit_id": []
} |
history_2914 | On 10 December 1916, his twenty-fifth birthday, Alexander became second-in-command (2-i-c) of the 1st Battalion, Irish Guards as an acting major. By May, he was briefly acting CO of the 1st Battalion, as an acting Lieutenant colonel (United Kingdom), while still only a substantive captain. He became a permanent major on 1 August 1917 and was again promoted acting lieutenant colonel, this time confirmed as CO of the 2nd Battalion, Irish Guards, on 15 October. Alexander commanded his battalion at Battle of Passchendaele, where he was slightly wounded, then at Bourlon Wood (part of the Battle of Cambrai (1917)), where his battalion suffered 320 casualties out of 400 men. Alexander, between 23 and 30 March 1918, had to assume command of the 4th Guards Brigade (United Kingdom), during the British retreat from the German Army (German Empire)s Spring Offensive. He once again commanded the 2nd Battalion, Irish Guards at Hazebrouck in April 1918, where it took such severe casualties that it saw no further action. Still an acting lieutenant colonel, he then commanded a corps infantry school in October 1918, a month before the war ended on Armistice of 11 November 1918. | How many times did Alexander command the 2nd Battalion? | 8b1b87e6-0a75-4f65-95b7-d653698171ab | {
"number": "2",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [],
"date": [],
"spans": [],
"worker_id": [],
"hit_id": []
} |
history_2914 | On 10 December 1916, his twenty-fifth birthday, Alexander became second-in-command (2-i-c) of the 1st Battalion, Irish Guards as an acting major. By May, he was briefly acting CO of the 1st Battalion, as an acting Lieutenant colonel (United Kingdom), while still only a substantive captain. He became a permanent major on 1 August 1917 and was again promoted acting lieutenant colonel, this time confirmed as CO of the 2nd Battalion, Irish Guards, on 15 October. Alexander commanded his battalion at Battle of Passchendaele, where he was slightly wounded, then at Bourlon Wood (part of the Battle of Cambrai (1917)), where his battalion suffered 320 casualties out of 400 men. Alexander, between 23 and 30 March 1918, had to assume command of the 4th Guards Brigade (United Kingdom), during the British retreat from the German Army (German Empire)s Spring Offensive. He once again commanded the 2nd Battalion, Irish Guards at Hazebrouck in April 1918, where it took such severe casualties that it saw no further action. Still an acting lieutenant colonel, he then commanded a corps infantry school in October 1918, a month before the war ended on Armistice of 11 November 1918. | How many months passed between the first time Alexander commanded the 2nd Battalion and the second time he commanded the battalion? | 2481557c-e1dd-404a-8600-77b6380e5a0d | {
"number": "6",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [],
"date": [],
"spans": [],
"worker_id": [],
"hit_id": []
} |
history_2914 | On 10 December 1916, his twenty-fifth birthday, Alexander became second-in-command (2-i-c) of the 1st Battalion, Irish Guards as an acting major. By May, he was briefly acting CO of the 1st Battalion, as an acting Lieutenant colonel (United Kingdom), while still only a substantive captain. He became a permanent major on 1 August 1917 and was again promoted acting lieutenant colonel, this time confirmed as CO of the 2nd Battalion, Irish Guards, on 15 October. Alexander commanded his battalion at Battle of Passchendaele, where he was slightly wounded, then at Bourlon Wood (part of the Battle of Cambrai (1917)), where his battalion suffered 320 casualties out of 400 men. Alexander, between 23 and 30 March 1918, had to assume command of the 4th Guards Brigade (United Kingdom), during the British retreat from the German Army (German Empire)s Spring Offensive. He once again commanded the 2nd Battalion, Irish Guards at Hazebrouck in April 1918, where it took such severe casualties that it saw no further action. Still an acting lieutenant colonel, he then commanded a corps infantry school in October 1918, a month before the war ended on Armistice of 11 November 1918. | Which did Alexander command first, the 2nd Battalion or a corps infantry school? | b41736f7-1029-40ae-9f6d-bda4817a4aa7 | {
"number": "",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [
"2nd Battalion"
],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [],
"date": [],
"spans": [],
"worker_id": [],
"hit_id": []
} |
history_3879 | On 10 July 2006, Deschamps was named head coach of Juventus F.C., after Fabio Capello resigned in the wake of the 2006 Italian football scandal. Deschamps first game in charge of Juventus was highly successful since Juventus beat U.S. Alessandria Calcio 1912 8-0 in a friendly, but poor results followed as Juventus was knocked out in the 2006-07 Coppa Italia and then drew 1-1 against A.C. Rimini 1912 on the first day of the league season. In the following three matches, Juventus beat Vicenza Calcio 2-1, F.C. Crotone 3-0 and Modena F.C. 4-0. Deschamps also helped Juventus to win their first competition since being relegated, which was the Birra Moretti Cup in which Juventus beat F.C. Internazionale Milano 1-0 and S.S.C. Napoli in a Penalty shoot-out (association football). He led Juventus to its return to Serie A, which was confirmed on 19 May 2007 with a 5-1 away win at A.C. Arezzo. On 26 May, several media announced Deschamps had resigned as Juventus manager, following several clashes with the club management. However, this was denied by the club itself a few hours later. Later that evening, after the game against A.C. Mantova, which confirmed Juve as 2006-07 Serie B, Deschamps confirmed to the media that he had indeed resigned and the news was then made official by Juventus a few hours later. | Who was head coach of Juventus F.C. first, Fabio Capello or Deschamps? | 55df73bb-b1f9-49f3-9892-720d3637b38b | {
"number": "",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [
"Fabio Capello"
],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [],
"date": [],
"spans": [],
"worker_id": [],
"hit_id": []
} |
history_3879 | On 10 July 2006, Deschamps was named head coach of Juventus F.C., after Fabio Capello resigned in the wake of the 2006 Italian football scandal. Deschamps first game in charge of Juventus was highly successful since Juventus beat U.S. Alessandria Calcio 1912 8-0 in a friendly, but poor results followed as Juventus was knocked out in the 2006-07 Coppa Italia and then drew 1-1 against A.C. Rimini 1912 on the first day of the league season. In the following three matches, Juventus beat Vicenza Calcio 2-1, F.C. Crotone 3-0 and Modena F.C. 4-0. Deschamps also helped Juventus to win their first competition since being relegated, which was the Birra Moretti Cup in which Juventus beat F.C. Internazionale Milano 1-0 and S.S.C. Napoli in a Penalty shoot-out (association football). He led Juventus to its return to Serie A, which was confirmed on 19 May 2007 with a 5-1 away win at A.C. Arezzo. On 26 May, several media announced Deschamps had resigned as Juventus manager, following several clashes with the club management. However, this was denied by the club itself a few hours later. Later that evening, after the game against A.C. Mantova, which confirmed Juve as 2006-07 Serie B, Deschamps confirmed to the media that he had indeed resigned and the news was then made official by Juventus a few hours later. | Which teams did Juventus prevent from scoring after in the three matches following its draw against A.C. Rimini? | 00455132-071e-4edf-8b93-3d76cf29a7d8 | {
"number": "",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [
"F.C. Crotone",
"Modena F.C"
],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [],
"date": [],
"spans": [],
"worker_id": [],
"hit_id": []
} |
history_3879 | On 10 July 2006, Deschamps was named head coach of Juventus F.C., after Fabio Capello resigned in the wake of the 2006 Italian football scandal. Deschamps first game in charge of Juventus was highly successful since Juventus beat U.S. Alessandria Calcio 1912 8-0 in a friendly, but poor results followed as Juventus was knocked out in the 2006-07 Coppa Italia and then drew 1-1 against A.C. Rimini 1912 on the first day of the league season. In the following three matches, Juventus beat Vicenza Calcio 2-1, F.C. Crotone 3-0 and Modena F.C. 4-0. Deschamps also helped Juventus to win their first competition since being relegated, which was the Birra Moretti Cup in which Juventus beat F.C. Internazionale Milano 1-0 and S.S.C. Napoli in a Penalty shoot-out (association football). He led Juventus to its return to Serie A, which was confirmed on 19 May 2007 with a 5-1 away win at A.C. Arezzo. On 26 May, several media announced Deschamps had resigned as Juventus manager, following several clashes with the club management. However, this was denied by the club itself a few hours later. Later that evening, after the game against A.C. Mantova, which confirmed Juve as 2006-07 Serie B, Deschamps confirmed to the media that he had indeed resigned and the news was then made official by Juventus a few hours later. | How many more points were scored by Juventus went up against A.C. Arezzo? | 67795bbe-fbbf-47c9-a7fd-16295fc811c4 | {
"number": "4",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [],
"date": [],
"spans": [],
"worker_id": [],
"hit_id": []
} |
history_2315 | After starting the season strongly, including a five-win run in September and October, the Chargers were beset by a string of injuries to key players, and eventually finished the season at 9-7. In contrast to 2013, the record was not enough to make the playoffs. The Chargers began the season 5–1, winning five straight after losing their season opener. It was followed by a three-game losing streak, and they finished 4–4 in the second half. They won just two of their final five games, coming back from double-digit fourth quarter deficits twice to remain in playoff contention. They lost the final game of the season when a win would have secured a playoff berth. In three of their last four games, and five of their last eight, the Chargers did not score more than one touchdown. Compared to 2013, the offense dropped in points (from 12th in the league to 17th), yards (5th to 18th), first downs (3rd to 15th), net yards per pass (2nd to 8th), rushing yards (13th to 30) and yards per rush (21st to 31st). It was the second time in three years the team finished second-to-last in yards per carry. San Diego was just 2–4 against teams in their division in the AFC West, and were swept by both the Denver Broncos and the Kansas City Chiefs. It was their worst intradivision record since they were 1–5 in 2003. The Chargers were only 3–6 against teams with winning records. They matched their 9–7 record from 2013, but missed the playoffs for the fourth time in five seasons. | How many wins did the Chargers have at the end of the season? | 1f0c688d-a38d-4f93-a595-ca671b5df9db | {
"number": "9",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [],
"date": [],
"spans": [],
"worker_id": [],
"hit_id": []
} |
history_2315 | After starting the season strongly, including a five-win run in September and October, the Chargers were beset by a string of injuries to key players, and eventually finished the season at 9-7. In contrast to 2013, the record was not enough to make the playoffs. The Chargers began the season 5–1, winning five straight after losing their season opener. It was followed by a three-game losing streak, and they finished 4–4 in the second half. They won just two of their final five games, coming back from double-digit fourth quarter deficits twice to remain in playoff contention. They lost the final game of the season when a win would have secured a playoff berth. In three of their last four games, and five of their last eight, the Chargers did not score more than one touchdown. Compared to 2013, the offense dropped in points (from 12th in the league to 17th), yards (5th to 18th), first downs (3rd to 15th), net yards per pass (2nd to 8th), rushing yards (13th to 30) and yards per rush (21st to 31st). It was the second time in three years the team finished second-to-last in yards per carry. San Diego was just 2–4 against teams in their division in the AFC West, and were swept by both the Denver Broncos and the Kansas City Chiefs. It was their worst intradivision record since they were 1–5 in 2003. The Chargers were only 3–6 against teams with winning records. They matched their 9–7 record from 2013, but missed the playoffs for the fourth time in five seasons. | How many of their final five games did the Chargers lose? | d93218e2-4780-41f6-b063-2004f0bc1ea3 | {
"number": "3",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [],
"date": [],
"spans": [],
"worker_id": [],
"hit_id": []
} |
history_2315 | After starting the season strongly, including a five-win run in September and October, the Chargers were beset by a string of injuries to key players, and eventually finished the season at 9-7. In contrast to 2013, the record was not enough to make the playoffs. The Chargers began the season 5–1, winning five straight after losing their season opener. It was followed by a three-game losing streak, and they finished 4–4 in the second half. They won just two of their final five games, coming back from double-digit fourth quarter deficits twice to remain in playoff contention. They lost the final game of the season when a win would have secured a playoff berth. In three of their last four games, and five of their last eight, the Chargers did not score more than one touchdown. Compared to 2013, the offense dropped in points (from 12th in the league to 17th), yards (5th to 18th), first downs (3rd to 15th), net yards per pass (2nd to 8th), rushing yards (13th to 30) and yards per rush (21st to 31st). It was the second time in three years the team finished second-to-last in yards per carry. San Diego was just 2–4 against teams in their division in the AFC West, and were swept by both the Denver Broncos and the Kansas City Chiefs. It was their worst intradivision record since they were 1–5 in 2003. The Chargers were only 3–6 against teams with winning records. They matched their 9–7 record from 2013, but missed the playoffs for the fourth time in five seasons. | How many of their first 6 games did the Chargers win? | ff121e32-05c2-4a44-8ee3-18213eb4ca55 | {
"number": "5",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [],
"date": [],
"spans": [],
"worker_id": [],
"hit_id": []
} |
history_2315 | After starting the season strongly, including a five-win run in September and October, the Chargers were beset by a string of injuries to key players, and eventually finished the season at 9-7. In contrast to 2013, the record was not enough to make the playoffs. The Chargers began the season 5–1, winning five straight after losing their season opener. It was followed by a three-game losing streak, and they finished 4–4 in the second half. They won just two of their final five games, coming back from double-digit fourth quarter deficits twice to remain in playoff contention. They lost the final game of the season when a win would have secured a playoff berth. In three of their last four games, and five of their last eight, the Chargers did not score more than one touchdown. Compared to 2013, the offense dropped in points (from 12th in the league to 17th), yards (5th to 18th), first downs (3rd to 15th), net yards per pass (2nd to 8th), rushing yards (13th to 30) and yards per rush (21st to 31st). It was the second time in three years the team finished second-to-last in yards per carry. San Diego was just 2–4 against teams in their division in the AFC West, and were swept by both the Denver Broncos and the Kansas City Chiefs. It was their worst intradivision record since they were 1–5 in 2003. The Chargers were only 3–6 against teams with winning records. They matched their 9–7 record from 2013, but missed the playoffs for the fourth time in five seasons. | How many of their last four games did the Chargers score more than one touchdown? | c2b6b7c1-e7ec-4023-ae82-f69e1fac20a0 | {
"number": "1",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [],
"date": [],
"spans": [],
"worker_id": [],
"hit_id": []
} |
history_2315 | After starting the season strongly, including a five-win run in September and October, the Chargers were beset by a string of injuries to key players, and eventually finished the season at 9-7. In contrast to 2013, the record was not enough to make the playoffs. The Chargers began the season 5–1, winning five straight after losing their season opener. It was followed by a three-game losing streak, and they finished 4–4 in the second half. They won just two of their final five games, coming back from double-digit fourth quarter deficits twice to remain in playoff contention. They lost the final game of the season when a win would have secured a playoff berth. In three of their last four games, and five of their last eight, the Chargers did not score more than one touchdown. Compared to 2013, the offense dropped in points (from 12th in the league to 17th), yards (5th to 18th), first downs (3rd to 15th), net yards per pass (2nd to 8th), rushing yards (13th to 30) and yards per rush (21st to 31st). It was the second time in three years the team finished second-to-last in yards per carry. San Diego was just 2–4 against teams in their division in the AFC West, and were swept by both the Denver Broncos and the Kansas City Chiefs. It was their worst intradivision record since they were 1–5 in 2003. The Chargers were only 3–6 against teams with winning records. They matched their 9–7 record from 2013, but missed the playoffs for the fourth time in five seasons. | How many of their final 8 games of the season did the Chargers win? | e319d43b-1e95-4df6-9263-8b98b08c147b | {
"number": "4",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [],
"date": [],
"spans": [],
"worker_id": [],
"hit_id": []
} |
history_2315 | After starting the season strongly, including a five-win run in September and October, the Chargers were beset by a string of injuries to key players, and eventually finished the season at 9-7. In contrast to 2013, the record was not enough to make the playoffs. The Chargers began the season 5–1, winning five straight after losing their season opener. It was followed by a three-game losing streak, and they finished 4–4 in the second half. They won just two of their final five games, coming back from double-digit fourth quarter deficits twice to remain in playoff contention. They lost the final game of the season when a win would have secured a playoff berth. In three of their last four games, and five of their last eight, the Chargers did not score more than one touchdown. Compared to 2013, the offense dropped in points (from 12th in the league to 17th), yards (5th to 18th), first downs (3rd to 15th), net yards per pass (2nd to 8th), rushing yards (13th to 30) and yards per rush (21st to 31st). It was the second time in three years the team finished second-to-last in yards per carry. San Diego was just 2–4 against teams in their division in the AFC West, and were swept by both the Denver Broncos and the Kansas City Chiefs. It was their worst intradivision record since they were 1–5 in 2003. The Chargers were only 3–6 against teams with winning records. They matched their 9–7 record from 2013, but missed the playoffs for the fourth time in five seasons. | What game of the season started the five game winning streak? | fbfd62a7-fa1d-4f5c-8304-bf72f12d821a | {
"number": "",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [
"second"
],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [],
"date": [],
"spans": [],
"worker_id": [],
"hit_id": []
} |
history_2315 | After starting the season strongly, including a five-win run in September and October, the Chargers were beset by a string of injuries to key players, and eventually finished the season at 9-7. In contrast to 2013, the record was not enough to make the playoffs. The Chargers began the season 5–1, winning five straight after losing their season opener. It was followed by a three-game losing streak, and they finished 4–4 in the second half. They won just two of their final five games, coming back from double-digit fourth quarter deficits twice to remain in playoff contention. They lost the final game of the season when a win would have secured a playoff berth. In three of their last four games, and five of their last eight, the Chargers did not score more than one touchdown. Compared to 2013, the offense dropped in points (from 12th in the league to 17th), yards (5th to 18th), first downs (3rd to 15th), net yards per pass (2nd to 8th), rushing yards (13th to 30) and yards per rush (21st to 31st). It was the second time in three years the team finished second-to-last in yards per carry. San Diego was just 2–4 against teams in their division in the AFC West, and were swept by both the Denver Broncos and the Kansas City Chiefs. It was their worst intradivision record since they were 1–5 in 2003. The Chargers were only 3–6 against teams with winning records. They matched their 9–7 record from 2013, but missed the playoffs for the fourth time in five seasons. | How many games did the winning streak last? | dafdc769-18fb-41ed-b0b9-950a8c5e9877 | {
"number": "5",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [],
"date": [],
"spans": [],
"worker_id": [],
"hit_id": []
} |
history_2315 | After starting the season strongly, including a five-win run in September and October, the Chargers were beset by a string of injuries to key players, and eventually finished the season at 9-7. In contrast to 2013, the record was not enough to make the playoffs. The Chargers began the season 5–1, winning five straight after losing their season opener. It was followed by a three-game losing streak, and they finished 4–4 in the second half. They won just two of their final five games, coming back from double-digit fourth quarter deficits twice to remain in playoff contention. They lost the final game of the season when a win would have secured a playoff berth. In three of their last four games, and five of their last eight, the Chargers did not score more than one touchdown. Compared to 2013, the offense dropped in points (from 12th in the league to 17th), yards (5th to 18th), first downs (3rd to 15th), net yards per pass (2nd to 8th), rushing yards (13th to 30) and yards per rush (21st to 31st). It was the second time in three years the team finished second-to-last in yards per carry. San Diego was just 2–4 against teams in their division in the AFC West, and were swept by both the Denver Broncos and the Kansas City Chiefs. It was their worst intradivision record since they were 1–5 in 2003. The Chargers were only 3–6 against teams with winning records. They matched their 9–7 record from 2013, but missed the playoffs for the fourth time in five seasons. | How many winning and losing streaks did the Chargers have? | e9da9a14-d991-4f88-8a8d-68e4bc1fb23e | {
"number": "2",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [],
"date": [],
"spans": [],
"worker_id": [],
"hit_id": []
} |
history_2315 | After starting the season strongly, including a five-win run in September and October, the Chargers were beset by a string of injuries to key players, and eventually finished the season at 9-7. In contrast to 2013, the record was not enough to make the playoffs. The Chargers began the season 5–1, winning five straight after losing their season opener. It was followed by a three-game losing streak, and they finished 4–4 in the second half. They won just two of their final five games, coming back from double-digit fourth quarter deficits twice to remain in playoff contention. They lost the final game of the season when a win would have secured a playoff berth. In three of their last four games, and five of their last eight, the Chargers did not score more than one touchdown. Compared to 2013, the offense dropped in points (from 12th in the league to 17th), yards (5th to 18th), first downs (3rd to 15th), net yards per pass (2nd to 8th), rushing yards (13th to 30) and yards per rush (21st to 31st). It was the second time in three years the team finished second-to-last in yards per carry. San Diego was just 2–4 against teams in their division in the AFC West, and were swept by both the Denver Broncos and the Kansas City Chiefs. It was their worst intradivision record since they were 1–5 in 2003. The Chargers were only 3–6 against teams with winning records. They matched their 9–7 record from 2013, but missed the playoffs for the fourth time in five seasons. | What month did the losing streak start? | cf9544ac-2e14-4ab2-a15c-276080be5afc | {
"number": "",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [
"October"
],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [],
"date": [],
"spans": [],
"worker_id": [],
"hit_id": []
} |
history_2315 | After starting the season strongly, including a five-win run in September and October, the Chargers were beset by a string of injuries to key players, and eventually finished the season at 9-7. In contrast to 2013, the record was not enough to make the playoffs. The Chargers began the season 5–1, winning five straight after losing their season opener. It was followed by a three-game losing streak, and they finished 4–4 in the second half. They won just two of their final five games, coming back from double-digit fourth quarter deficits twice to remain in playoff contention. They lost the final game of the season when a win would have secured a playoff berth. In three of their last four games, and five of their last eight, the Chargers did not score more than one touchdown. Compared to 2013, the offense dropped in points (from 12th in the league to 17th), yards (5th to 18th), first downs (3rd to 15th), net yards per pass (2nd to 8th), rushing yards (13th to 30) and yards per rush (21st to 31st). It was the second time in three years the team finished second-to-last in yards per carry. San Diego was just 2–4 against teams in their division in the AFC West, and were swept by both the Denver Broncos and the Kansas City Chiefs. It was their worst intradivision record since they were 1–5 in 2003. The Chargers were only 3–6 against teams with winning records. They matched their 9–7 record from 2013, but missed the playoffs for the fourth time in five seasons. | How many more wins than losses did the Chargers have in their first eight games? | 7d0411dd-e6b1-44a3-b1c0-ca5971ae6cb4 | {
"number": "0",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [],
"date": [],
"spans": [],
"worker_id": [],
"hit_id": []
} |
history_2315 | After starting the season strongly, including a five-win run in September and October, the Chargers were beset by a string of injuries to key players, and eventually finished the season at 9-7. In contrast to 2013, the record was not enough to make the playoffs. The Chargers began the season 5–1, winning five straight after losing their season opener. It was followed by a three-game losing streak, and they finished 4–4 in the second half. They won just two of their final five games, coming back from double-digit fourth quarter deficits twice to remain in playoff contention. They lost the final game of the season when a win would have secured a playoff berth. In three of their last four games, and five of their last eight, the Chargers did not score more than one touchdown. Compared to 2013, the offense dropped in points (from 12th in the league to 17th), yards (5th to 18th), first downs (3rd to 15th), net yards per pass (2nd to 8th), rushing yards (13th to 30) and yards per rush (21st to 31st). It was the second time in three years the team finished second-to-last in yards per carry. San Diego was just 2–4 against teams in their division in the AFC West, and were swept by both the Denver Broncos and the Kansas City Chiefs. It was their worst intradivision record since they were 1–5 in 2003. The Chargers were only 3–6 against teams with winning records. They matched their 9–7 record from 2013, but missed the playoffs for the fourth time in five seasons. | How many more losses did the Chargers have at the end of the season than after week 8? | 8ee99b0d-41e0-4843-bd7b-379d440e4dc5 | {
"number": "3",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [],
"date": [],
"spans": [],
"worker_id": [],
"hit_id": []
} |
history_2315 | After starting the season strongly, including a five-win run in September and October, the Chargers were beset by a string of injuries to key players, and eventually finished the season at 9-7. In contrast to 2013, the record was not enough to make the playoffs. The Chargers began the season 5–1, winning five straight after losing their season opener. It was followed by a three-game losing streak, and they finished 4–4 in the second half. They won just two of their final five games, coming back from double-digit fourth quarter deficits twice to remain in playoff contention. They lost the final game of the season when a win would have secured a playoff berth. In three of their last four games, and five of their last eight, the Chargers did not score more than one touchdown. Compared to 2013, the offense dropped in points (from 12th in the league to 17th), yards (5th to 18th), first downs (3rd to 15th), net yards per pass (2nd to 8th), rushing yards (13th to 30) and yards per rush (21st to 31st). It was the second time in three years the team finished second-to-last in yards per carry. San Diego was just 2–4 against teams in their division in the AFC West, and were swept by both the Denver Broncos and the Kansas City Chiefs. It was their worst intradivision record since they were 1–5 in 2003. The Chargers were only 3–6 against teams with winning records. They matched their 9–7 record from 2013, but missed the playoffs for the fourth time in five seasons. | How many more losses than wins did the Chargers have in their division? | fedad55f-5e5d-412a-b43d-845d70f29cd7 | {
"number": "2",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [],
"date": [],
"spans": [],
"worker_id": [],
"hit_id": []
} |
history_2315 | After starting the season strongly, including a five-win run in September and October, the Chargers were beset by a string of injuries to key players, and eventually finished the season at 9-7. In contrast to 2013, the record was not enough to make the playoffs. The Chargers began the season 5–1, winning five straight after losing their season opener. It was followed by a three-game losing streak, and they finished 4–4 in the second half. They won just two of their final five games, coming back from double-digit fourth quarter deficits twice to remain in playoff contention. They lost the final game of the season when a win would have secured a playoff berth. In three of their last four games, and five of their last eight, the Chargers did not score more than one touchdown. Compared to 2013, the offense dropped in points (from 12th in the league to 17th), yards (5th to 18th), first downs (3rd to 15th), net yards per pass (2nd to 8th), rushing yards (13th to 30) and yards per rush (21st to 31st). It was the second time in three years the team finished second-to-last in yards per carry. San Diego was just 2–4 against teams in their division in the AFC West, and were swept by both the Denver Broncos and the Kansas City Chiefs. It was their worst intradivision record since they were 1–5 in 2003. The Chargers were only 3–6 against teams with winning records. They matched their 9–7 record from 2013, but missed the playoffs for the fourth time in five seasons. | How many teams in the division swept the Chargers? | f5022b05-9c2f-491d-b5b2-27e4406bacdf | {
"number": "2",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [],
"date": [],
"spans": [],
"worker_id": [],
"hit_id": []
} |
history_2315 | After starting the season strongly, including a five-win run in September and October, the Chargers were beset by a string of injuries to key players, and eventually finished the season at 9-7. In contrast to 2013, the record was not enough to make the playoffs. The Chargers began the season 5–1, winning five straight after losing their season opener. It was followed by a three-game losing streak, and they finished 4–4 in the second half. They won just two of their final five games, coming back from double-digit fourth quarter deficits twice to remain in playoff contention. They lost the final game of the season when a win would have secured a playoff berth. In three of their last four games, and five of their last eight, the Chargers did not score more than one touchdown. Compared to 2013, the offense dropped in points (from 12th in the league to 17th), yards (5th to 18th), first downs (3rd to 15th), net yards per pass (2nd to 8th), rushing yards (13th to 30) and yards per rush (21st to 31st). It was the second time in three years the team finished second-to-last in yards per carry. San Diego was just 2–4 against teams in their division in the AFC West, and were swept by both the Denver Broncos and the Kansas City Chiefs. It was their worst intradivision record since they were 1–5 in 2003. The Chargers were only 3–6 against teams with winning records. They matched their 9–7 record from 2013, but missed the playoffs for the fourth time in five seasons. | How many of their wins for the season were not against teams with winning records? | 8ff5a01e-5d34-429c-a25e-da8d17015274 | {
"number": "6",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [],
"date": [],
"spans": [],
"worker_id": [],
"hit_id": []
} |
history_2315 | After starting the season strongly, including a five-win run in September and October, the Chargers were beset by a string of injuries to key players, and eventually finished the season at 9-7. In contrast to 2013, the record was not enough to make the playoffs. The Chargers began the season 5–1, winning five straight after losing their season opener. It was followed by a three-game losing streak, and they finished 4–4 in the second half. They won just two of their final five games, coming back from double-digit fourth quarter deficits twice to remain in playoff contention. They lost the final game of the season when a win would have secured a playoff berth. In three of their last four games, and five of their last eight, the Chargers did not score more than one touchdown. Compared to 2013, the offense dropped in points (from 12th in the league to 17th), yards (5th to 18th), first downs (3rd to 15th), net yards per pass (2nd to 8th), rushing yards (13th to 30) and yards per rush (21st to 31st). It was the second time in three years the team finished second-to-last in yards per carry. San Diego was just 2–4 against teams in their division in the AFC West, and were swept by both the Denver Broncos and the Kansas City Chiefs. It was their worst intradivision record since they were 1–5 in 2003. The Chargers were only 3–6 against teams with winning records. They matched their 9–7 record from 2013, but missed the playoffs for the fourth time in five seasons. | How many of the Chargers losses were against teams without winning records? | a919d08b-ac8c-471b-915c-7241b4458b38 | {
"number": "1",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [],
"date": [],
"spans": [],
"worker_id": [],
"hit_id": []
} |
history_2315 | After starting the season strongly, including a five-win run in September and October, the Chargers were beset by a string of injuries to key players, and eventually finished the season at 9-7. In contrast to 2013, the record was not enough to make the playoffs. The Chargers began the season 5–1, winning five straight after losing their season opener. It was followed by a three-game losing streak, and they finished 4–4 in the second half. They won just two of their final five games, coming back from double-digit fourth quarter deficits twice to remain in playoff contention. They lost the final game of the season when a win would have secured a playoff berth. In three of their last four games, and five of their last eight, the Chargers did not score more than one touchdown. Compared to 2013, the offense dropped in points (from 12th in the league to 17th), yards (5th to 18th), first downs (3rd to 15th), net yards per pass (2nd to 8th), rushing yards (13th to 30) and yards per rush (21st to 31st). It was the second time in three years the team finished second-to-last in yards per carry. San Diego was just 2–4 against teams in their division in the AFC West, and were swept by both the Denver Broncos and the Kansas City Chiefs. It was their worst intradivision record since they were 1–5 in 2003. The Chargers were only 3–6 against teams with winning records. They matched their 9–7 record from 2013, but missed the playoffs for the fourth time in five seasons. | Did the Chargers win or lose more games against teams with winning records? | f969294d-6b97-4088-aa5b-62886317c2b7 | {
"number": "",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [
"lose"
],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [],
"date": [],
"spans": [],
"worker_id": [],
"hit_id": []
} |
history_2315 | After starting the season strongly, including a five-win run in September and October, the Chargers were beset by a string of injuries to key players, and eventually finished the season at 9-7. In contrast to 2013, the record was not enough to make the playoffs. The Chargers began the season 5–1, winning five straight after losing their season opener. It was followed by a three-game losing streak, and they finished 4–4 in the second half. They won just two of their final five games, coming back from double-digit fourth quarter deficits twice to remain in playoff contention. They lost the final game of the season when a win would have secured a playoff berth. In three of their last four games, and five of their last eight, the Chargers did not score more than one touchdown. Compared to 2013, the offense dropped in points (from 12th in the league to 17th), yards (5th to 18th), first downs (3rd to 15th), net yards per pass (2nd to 8th), rushing yards (13th to 30) and yards per rush (21st to 31st). It was the second time in three years the team finished second-to-last in yards per carry. San Diego was just 2–4 against teams in their division in the AFC West, and were swept by both the Denver Broncos and the Kansas City Chiefs. It was their worst intradivision record since they were 1–5 in 2003. The Chargers were only 3–6 against teams with winning records. They matched their 9–7 record from 2013, but missed the playoffs for the fourth time in five seasons. | How many of their last eight games did the Chargers score more than one touchdown? | d2680b8c-baee-4be7-b88c-86783103db18 | {
"number": "3",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [],
"date": [],
"spans": [],
"worker_id": [],
"hit_id": []
} |
history_2507 | In the financial year ended 31 July 2011, Manchester Metropolitan University had a total income of £248,028,000 (2009/10 - £243,606,000) and a total expenditure of £213,103,000 (2009/10 - £220,221,000). The Universitys collects £106,857,000 from tuition fees and education contracts (2009/10 - £101,640,000) and attracts £4,992,000 in research grants and contracts (2009/10 - £4,414,000). Income from other sources totalled £31,371,000 (2009/10 - 30,524,000). | Which increased more between 2010 and 2011, income or expenditure? | d4c87999-e0b1-46fc-b114-a8f3bf192147 | {
"number": "",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [
"expenditure"
],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [],
"date": [],
"spans": [],
"worker_id": [],
"hit_id": []
} |
history_2507 | In the financial year ended 31 July 2011, Manchester Metropolitan University had a total income of £248,028,000 (2009/10 - £243,606,000) and a total expenditure of £213,103,000 (2009/10 - £220,221,000). The Universitys collects £106,857,000 from tuition fees and education contracts (2009/10 - £101,640,000) and attracts £4,992,000 in research grants and contracts (2009/10 - £4,414,000). Income from other sources totalled £31,371,000 (2009/10 - 30,524,000). | How many more pounds did the Manchester Metropolitan University have in income than its expenses? | 7a911f9e-6c93-4267-9402-dc090cd0e0b9 | {
"number": "34925000",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [],
"date": [],
"spans": [],
"worker_id": [],
"hit_id": []
} |
history_2507 | In the financial year ended 31 July 2011, Manchester Metropolitan University had a total income of £248,028,000 (2009/10 - £243,606,000) and a total expenditure of £213,103,000 (2009/10 - £220,221,000). The Universitys collects £106,857,000 from tuition fees and education contracts (2009/10 - £101,640,000) and attracts £4,992,000 in research grants and contracts (2009/10 - £4,414,000). Income from other sources totalled £31,371,000 (2009/10 - 30,524,000). | How many more pounds does the University collect in tuition fees and education contracts than it receives in research grants? | e90a29e3-dc25-48f8-9039-f6127e0551f8 | {
"number": "101865000",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [],
"date": [],
"spans": [],
"worker_id": [],
"hit_id": []
} |
history_3003 | In 1977, after just 50 home games, the Blue Jays set an MLB record for a first-year expansion team, with an overall attendance of 1,219,551 during those games. By the end of the season, 1,701,152 fans had attended. In 1991, the Blue Jays became the first MLB team to attract over Major League Baseball attendance records, with an attendance of 4,001,526, followed by 4,028,318 in 1992. Each of those records were broken in 1993 by the expansion 1993 Colorado Rockies season, although the Blue Jays 1993 attendance of 4,057,947 stood as an AL record for 12 years until it was broken by the 2005 New York Yankees season. | How many more people attended Blue Jays games in 1991 compared to 1977? | 81d09a05-facc-41ec-bbed-b0ffb54773a6 | {
"number": "2300374",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [],
"date": [],
"spans": [],
"worker_id": [],
"hit_id": []
} |
history_3014 | The US had a gold stock of 1.9 million ounces (59 t) in 1862. Stocks rose to 2.6 million ounces (81 t) in 1866, declined in 1875 to 1.6 million ounces (50 t) and rose to 2.5 million ounces (78 t) in 1878. Net exports did not mirror that pattern. In the decade before the Civil War net exports were roughly constant; postwar they varied erratically around pre-war levels, but fell significantly in 1877 and became negative in 1878 and 1879. The net import of gold meant that the foreign demand for American currency to purchase goods, services, and investments exceeded the corresponding American demands for foreign currencies. In the final years of the greenback period (1862-1879), gold production increased while gold exports decreased. The decrease in gold exports was considered by some to be a result of changing monetary conditions. The demands for gold during this period were as a speculative vehicle, and for its primary use in the foreign exchange markets financing international trade. The major effect of the increase in gold demand by the public and Treasury was to reduce exports of gold and increase the Greenback price of gold relative to purchasing power. | Was the gold stock of the United States higher in 1862 or 1866? | 63eb1d06-b2f6-48e1-a466-1679dff6ec6b | {
"number": "",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": "1866"
},
"spans": [],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [],
"date": [],
"spans": [],
"worker_id": [],
"hit_id": []
} |
history_3014 | The US had a gold stock of 1.9 million ounces (59 t) in 1862. Stocks rose to 2.6 million ounces (81 t) in 1866, declined in 1875 to 1.6 million ounces (50 t) and rose to 2.5 million ounces (78 t) in 1878. Net exports did not mirror that pattern. In the decade before the Civil War net exports were roughly constant; postwar they varied erratically around pre-war levels, but fell significantly in 1877 and became negative in 1878 and 1879. The net import of gold meant that the foreign demand for American currency to purchase goods, services, and investments exceeded the corresponding American demands for foreign currencies. In the final years of the greenback period (1862-1879), gold production increased while gold exports decreased. The decrease in gold exports was considered by some to be a result of changing monetary conditions. The demands for gold during this period were as a speculative vehicle, and for its primary use in the foreign exchange markets financing international trade. The major effect of the increase in gold demand by the public and Treasury was to reduce exports of gold and increase the Greenback price of gold relative to purchasing power. | Was the gold stock of the United States higher in 1866 or 1878? | f4da937c-f5f7-48ad-aaa8-bbddadd8cf89 | {
"number": "",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": "1866"
},
"spans": [],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [],
"date": [],
"spans": [],
"worker_id": [],
"hit_id": []
} |
history_3069 | The maximum temperature recorded at the Met Éireann Weather station was on 2 August 1995. Extremes recorded at the station include the highest air temperature of on 29 June 1976, the lowest air temperature of on 2 January 1979 and the lowest ground temperature of on 12 January 1982. The maximum daily sunshine was 16.3 hours on 18 June 1978. The warmest and sunniest month on record in Kilkenny was August 1995 with a total of 274.9 hours Sunlight and very high temperatures throughout. The maximum daily sunshine was 16.3 hours on 18 June 1978. The overall trend in temperatures has been on the rise with a marked increase from 1988 onwards. Annual temperatures are running over 0.5 degrees above 20th-century levels. | How many years was the time span where the highest air temperature occurred and the lowest air temperature were recorded at the Met Éireann Weather station | 08b53736-0709-4abe-89c0-06a3dde573a6 | {
"number": "3",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [],
"date": [],
"spans": [],
"worker_id": [],
"hit_id": []
} |
history_3069 | The maximum temperature recorded at the Met Éireann Weather station was on 2 August 1995. Extremes recorded at the station include the highest air temperature of on 29 June 1976, the lowest air temperature of on 2 January 1979 and the lowest ground temperature of on 12 January 1982. The maximum daily sunshine was 16.3 hours on 18 June 1978. The warmest and sunniest month on record in Kilkenny was August 1995 with a total of 274.9 hours Sunlight and very high temperatures throughout. The maximum daily sunshine was 16.3 hours on 18 June 1978. The overall trend in temperatures has been on the rise with a marked increase from 1988 onwards. Annual temperatures are running over 0.5 degrees above 20th-century levels. | How many years apart were the extreme highest and lowest air temperatures recorded? | 9f6b1e37-5e30-41bb-ad65-fbd97d568dbe | {
"number": "3",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [],
"date": [],
"spans": [],
"worker_id": [],
"hit_id": []
} |
history_3342 | The profound demographic and economic changes that occurred in Finland after World War II affected the Finnish family. Families became smaller, dropping from an average of 3.6 persons in 1950 to an average of 2.7 by 1975. Family composition did not change much in that quarter of a century, however, and in 1975 the percentage of families that consisted of a man and a woman was 24.4; of a couple and children, 61.9; of a woman with offspring, 11.8; of a man and offspring, 1.9. These percentages are not markedly different from those of 1950. Change was seen in the number of children per family, which fell from an average of 2.24 in 1950 to an average of 1.7 in the mid-1980s, and large families were rare. Only 2 percent of families had four or more children, while 51 percent had one child; 38 percent, two children; and 9 percent, three children. The number of Finns under the age of 18 dropped from 1.5 million in 1960 to 1.2 million in 1980. | Was the average number of persons in a family smaller in 1950 or 1975? | 900f571d-8c0e-403c-a843-787bcaceea9d | {
"number": "",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": "1975"
},
"spans": [],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [],
"date": [],
"spans": [],
"worker_id": [],
"hit_id": []
} |
history_3342 | The profound demographic and economic changes that occurred in Finland after World War II affected the Finnish family. Families became smaller, dropping from an average of 3.6 persons in 1950 to an average of 2.7 by 1975. Family composition did not change much in that quarter of a century, however, and in 1975 the percentage of families that consisted of a man and a woman was 24.4; of a couple and children, 61.9; of a woman with offspring, 11.8; of a man and offspring, 1.9. These percentages are not markedly different from those of 1950. Change was seen in the number of children per family, which fell from an average of 2.24 in 1950 to an average of 1.7 in the mid-1980s, and large families were rare. Only 2 percent of families had four or more children, while 51 percent had one child; 38 percent, two children; and 9 percent, three children. The number of Finns under the age of 18 dropped from 1.5 million in 1960 to 1.2 million in 1980. | How many fewer persons were there on average in a family in 1975 compared to 1950? | 59aadacc-f445-45ed-a4ad-f3d4d178e494 | {
"number": "0.9",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [],
"date": [],
"spans": [],
"worker_id": [],
"hit_id": []
} |
history_3342 | The profound demographic and economic changes that occurred in Finland after World War II affected the Finnish family. Families became smaller, dropping from an average of 3.6 persons in 1950 to an average of 2.7 by 1975. Family composition did not change much in that quarter of a century, however, and in 1975 the percentage of families that consisted of a man and a woman was 24.4; of a couple and children, 61.9; of a woman with offspring, 11.8; of a man and offspring, 1.9. These percentages are not markedly different from those of 1950. Change was seen in the number of children per family, which fell from an average of 2.24 in 1950 to an average of 1.7 in the mid-1980s, and large families were rare. Only 2 percent of families had four or more children, while 51 percent had one child; 38 percent, two children; and 9 percent, three children. The number of Finns under the age of 18 dropped from 1.5 million in 1960 to 1.2 million in 1980. | How many families, in terms of percentage, did not have 4 or more children? | a842ae82-ec37-4cf9-807d-c00679b2c79c | {
"number": "98",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [],
"date": [],
"spans": [],
"worker_id": [],
"hit_id": []
} |
history_3342 | The profound demographic and economic changes that occurred in Finland after World War II affected the Finnish family. Families became smaller, dropping from an average of 3.6 persons in 1950 to an average of 2.7 by 1975. Family composition did not change much in that quarter of a century, however, and in 1975 the percentage of families that consisted of a man and a woman was 24.4; of a couple and children, 61.9; of a woman with offspring, 11.8; of a man and offspring, 1.9. These percentages are not markedly different from those of 1950. Change was seen in the number of children per family, which fell from an average of 2.24 in 1950 to an average of 1.7 in the mid-1980s, and large families were rare. Only 2 percent of families had four or more children, while 51 percent had one child; 38 percent, two children; and 9 percent, three children. The number of Finns under the age of 18 dropped from 1.5 million in 1960 to 1.2 million in 1980. | What were the two most common numbers of children in a Finnish family? | eb376cd9-a8a0-4744-a586-72bc66d5504a | {
"number": "",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [
"one",
"two"
],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [],
"date": [],
"spans": [],
"worker_id": [],
"hit_id": []
} |
history_3342 | The profound demographic and economic changes that occurred in Finland after World War II affected the Finnish family. Families became smaller, dropping from an average of 3.6 persons in 1950 to an average of 2.7 by 1975. Family composition did not change much in that quarter of a century, however, and in 1975 the percentage of families that consisted of a man and a woman was 24.4; of a couple and children, 61.9; of a woman with offspring, 11.8; of a man and offspring, 1.9. These percentages are not markedly different from those of 1950. Change was seen in the number of children per family, which fell from an average of 2.24 in 1950 to an average of 1.7 in the mid-1980s, and large families were rare. Only 2 percent of families had four or more children, while 51 percent had one child; 38 percent, two children; and 9 percent, three children. The number of Finns under the age of 18 dropped from 1.5 million in 1960 to 1.2 million in 1980. | What were the two least frequent numbers of children in a finnish family? | 06af1fe3-5701-44b6-9e60-2e43c1b2b5a4 | {
"number": "",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [
"four or more",
"three"
],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [],
"date": [],
"spans": [],
"worker_id": [],
"hit_id": []
} |
history_3342 | The profound demographic and economic changes that occurred in Finland after World War II affected the Finnish family. Families became smaller, dropping from an average of 3.6 persons in 1950 to an average of 2.7 by 1975. Family composition did not change much in that quarter of a century, however, and in 1975 the percentage of families that consisted of a man and a woman was 24.4; of a couple and children, 61.9; of a woman with offspring, 11.8; of a man and offspring, 1.9. These percentages are not markedly different from those of 1950. Change was seen in the number of children per family, which fell from an average of 2.24 in 1950 to an average of 1.7 in the mid-1980s, and large families were rare. Only 2 percent of families had four or more children, while 51 percent had one child; 38 percent, two children; and 9 percent, three children. The number of Finns under the age of 18 dropped from 1.5 million in 1960 to 1.2 million in 1980. | Did more families have one child or two children? | 5efead84-07e2-4b51-a979-a2bf445582e5 | {
"number": "",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [
"one child"
],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [],
"date": [],
"spans": [],
"worker_id": [],
"hit_id": []
} |
history_3408 | The first run of the magazine was priced at 25 cents for the first fifteen years of its life except for the oversized May/June/July 1924 issue, which was 50 cents. In September 1939 the price was reduced to 15 cents, where it stayed until the September 1947 issue, which was 20 cents. The price went up again to 25 cents in May 1949; the digest-sized issues from September 1953 to September 1954 were 35 cents. The first three paperbacks edited by Lin Carter were priced at $2.50; the fourth was $2.95. The two Bellerophon issues were $2.50 and $2.95. The Terminus Weird Tales began in Spring 1988 priced at $3.50; this went up to $4.00 with the Fall 1988 issue, and to $4.95 with the Summer 1990 issue. The next price increase was to $5.95, in Spring 2003, and then to $6.99 with the January 2008 issue. The first two issues from Nth Dimension Media were priced at $7.95 and $6.99; the last two were $9.99 each. | How many less cents was the magazine that was priced 25 reduced another 15 cents? | cea79265-a0da-4ffb-a7ec-6e50069c4986 | {
"number": "10",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [],
"date": [],
"spans": [],
"worker_id": [],
"hit_id": []
} |
history_3408 | The first run of the magazine was priced at 25 cents for the first fifteen years of its life except for the oversized May/June/July 1924 issue, which was 50 cents. In September 1939 the price was reduced to 15 cents, where it stayed until the September 1947 issue, which was 20 cents. The price went up again to 25 cents in May 1949; the digest-sized issues from September 1953 to September 1954 were 35 cents. The first three paperbacks edited by Lin Carter were priced at $2.50; the fourth was $2.95. The two Bellerophon issues were $2.50 and $2.95. The Terminus Weird Tales began in Spring 1988 priced at $3.50; this went up to $4.00 with the Fall 1988 issue, and to $4.95 with the Summer 1990 issue. The next price increase was to $5.95, in Spring 2003, and then to $6.99 with the January 2008 issue. The first two issues from Nth Dimension Media were priced at $7.95 and $6.99; the last two were $9.99 each. | How many cents did Terminus Weird Tales increase from $3.50 to $4.00? | fe9984a4-14ed-4a92-8f2a-6ba9b3852117 | {
"number": "50",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [],
"date": [],
"spans": [],
"worker_id": [],
"hit_id": []
} |
history_3408 | The first run of the magazine was priced at 25 cents for the first fifteen years of its life except for the oversized May/June/July 1924 issue, which was 50 cents. In September 1939 the price was reduced to 15 cents, where it stayed until the September 1947 issue, which was 20 cents. The price went up again to 25 cents in May 1949; the digest-sized issues from September 1953 to September 1954 were 35 cents. The first three paperbacks edited by Lin Carter were priced at $2.50; the fourth was $2.95. The two Bellerophon issues were $2.50 and $2.95. The Terminus Weird Tales began in Spring 1988 priced at $3.50; this went up to $4.00 with the Fall 1988 issue, and to $4.95 with the Summer 1990 issue. The next price increase was to $5.95, in Spring 2003, and then to $6.99 with the January 2008 issue. The first two issues from Nth Dimension Media were priced at $7.95 and $6.99; the last two were $9.99 each. | What magazines had the highest price two Bellerphon for $2.95 or Terminus at $3.50? | 85d792dc-1bdb-4002-ba2d-c6300127d5a2 | {
"number": "",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [
"Terminus"
],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [],
"date": [],
"spans": [],
"worker_id": [],
"hit_id": []
} |
history_3408 | The first run of the magazine was priced at 25 cents for the first fifteen years of its life except for the oversized May/June/July 1924 issue, which was 50 cents. In September 1939 the price was reduced to 15 cents, where it stayed until the September 1947 issue, which was 20 cents. The price went up again to 25 cents in May 1949; the digest-sized issues from September 1953 to September 1954 were 35 cents. The first three paperbacks edited by Lin Carter were priced at $2.50; the fourth was $2.95. The two Bellerophon issues were $2.50 and $2.95. The Terminus Weird Tales began in Spring 1988 priced at $3.50; this went up to $4.00 with the Fall 1988 issue, and to $4.95 with the Summer 1990 issue. The next price increase was to $5.95, in Spring 2003, and then to $6.99 with the January 2008 issue. The first two issues from Nth Dimension Media were priced at $7.95 and $6.99; the last two were $9.99 each. | Which paperback edited by Lin Carter was priced the highest, third or fourth? | de210fc2-1c49-4404-95f7-60f8ac51d608 | {
"number": "",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [
"fourth"
],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [],
"date": [],
"spans": [],
"worker_id": [],
"hit_id": []
} |
history_3408 | The first run of the magazine was priced at 25 cents for the first fifteen years of its life except for the oversized May/June/July 1924 issue, which was 50 cents. In September 1939 the price was reduced to 15 cents, where it stayed until the September 1947 issue, which was 20 cents. The price went up again to 25 cents in May 1949; the digest-sized issues from September 1953 to September 1954 were 35 cents. The first three paperbacks edited by Lin Carter were priced at $2.50; the fourth was $2.95. The two Bellerophon issues were $2.50 and $2.95. The Terminus Weird Tales began in Spring 1988 priced at $3.50; this went up to $4.00 with the Fall 1988 issue, and to $4.95 with the Summer 1990 issue. The next price increase was to $5.95, in Spring 2003, and then to $6.99 with the January 2008 issue. The first two issues from Nth Dimension Media were priced at $7.95 and $6.99; the last two were $9.99 each. | How many more cents did Lin Carter edited paperback increase from $2.50 to $2.95? | e2e3c4ee-fc40-4ecf-9ec5-d681c85d6e0b | {
"number": "45",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [],
"date": [],
"spans": [],
"worker_id": [],
"hit_id": []
} |
history_3408 | The first run of the magazine was priced at 25 cents for the first fifteen years of its life except for the oversized May/June/July 1924 issue, which was 50 cents. In September 1939 the price was reduced to 15 cents, where it stayed until the September 1947 issue, which was 20 cents. The price went up again to 25 cents in May 1949; the digest-sized issues from September 1953 to September 1954 were 35 cents. The first three paperbacks edited by Lin Carter were priced at $2.50; the fourth was $2.95. The two Bellerophon issues were $2.50 and $2.95. The Terminus Weird Tales began in Spring 1988 priced at $3.50; this went up to $4.00 with the Fall 1988 issue, and to $4.95 with the Summer 1990 issue. The next price increase was to $5.95, in Spring 2003, and then to $6.99 with the January 2008 issue. The first two issues from Nth Dimension Media were priced at $7.95 and $6.99; the last two were $9.99 each. | How many more cents was the fourth paperback edited by Lin Carter than the first three? | 6d71213d-1e2d-44a2-ba09-e5e07da6a7e8 | {
"number": "45",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [],
"date": [],
"spans": [],
"worker_id": [],
"hit_id": []
} |
history_3408 | The first run of the magazine was priced at 25 cents for the first fifteen years of its life except for the oversized May/June/July 1924 issue, which was 50 cents. In September 1939 the price was reduced to 15 cents, where it stayed until the September 1947 issue, which was 20 cents. The price went up again to 25 cents in May 1949; the digest-sized issues from September 1953 to September 1954 were 35 cents. The first three paperbacks edited by Lin Carter were priced at $2.50; the fourth was $2.95. The two Bellerophon issues were $2.50 and $2.95. The Terminus Weird Tales began in Spring 1988 priced at $3.50; this went up to $4.00 with the Fall 1988 issue, and to $4.95 with the Summer 1990 issue. The next price increase was to $5.95, in Spring 2003, and then to $6.99 with the January 2008 issue. The first two issues from Nth Dimension Media were priced at $7.95 and $6.99; the last two were $9.99 each. | How many dollars would it have cost to buy the first paperback edited by Lin Carter, the second Bellerophon issue and the Fall 1988 issue of the Terminus Weird Tales? | fb99c336-c093-4a98-ae50-920bd53cb904 | {
"number": "9.45",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [],
"date": [],
"spans": [],
"worker_id": [],
"hit_id": []
} |
history_3408 | The first run of the magazine was priced at 25 cents for the first fifteen years of its life except for the oversized May/June/July 1924 issue, which was 50 cents. In September 1939 the price was reduced to 15 cents, where it stayed until the September 1947 issue, which was 20 cents. The price went up again to 25 cents in May 1949; the digest-sized issues from September 1953 to September 1954 were 35 cents. The first three paperbacks edited by Lin Carter were priced at $2.50; the fourth was $2.95. The two Bellerophon issues were $2.50 and $2.95. The Terminus Weird Tales began in Spring 1988 priced at $3.50; this went up to $4.00 with the Fall 1988 issue, and to $4.95 with the Summer 1990 issue. The next price increase was to $5.95, in Spring 2003, and then to $6.99 with the January 2008 issue. The first two issues from Nth Dimension Media were priced at $7.95 and $6.99; the last two were $9.99 each. | How many dollars would it have cost to buy the first Bellerophon issue, the second Bellerophon issue and the Summer 1990 issue of the Terminus Weird Tales? | 4601a055-016f-4692-9ba5-526c13ef0169 | {
"number": "10.40",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [],
"date": [],
"spans": [],
"worker_id": [],
"hit_id": []
} |
history_3408 | The first run of the magazine was priced at 25 cents for the first fifteen years of its life except for the oversized May/June/July 1924 issue, which was 50 cents. In September 1939 the price was reduced to 15 cents, where it stayed until the September 1947 issue, which was 20 cents. The price went up again to 25 cents in May 1949; the digest-sized issues from September 1953 to September 1954 were 35 cents. The first three paperbacks edited by Lin Carter were priced at $2.50; the fourth was $2.95. The two Bellerophon issues were $2.50 and $2.95. The Terminus Weird Tales began in Spring 1988 priced at $3.50; this went up to $4.00 with the Fall 1988 issue, and to $4.95 with the Summer 1990 issue. The next price increase was to $5.95, in Spring 2003, and then to $6.99 with the January 2008 issue. The first two issues from Nth Dimension Media were priced at $7.95 and $6.99; the last two were $9.99 each. | How many dollars would it have cost to buy the Summer 1990, Spring 2003 and January 2008 issues of the Terminus Weird Tales? | b4ec3a5f-2487-4593-bc11-20091f4fd1e9 | {
"number": "17.89",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [],
"date": [],
"spans": [],
"worker_id": [],
"hit_id": []
} |
history_3408 | The first run of the magazine was priced at 25 cents for the first fifteen years of its life except for the oversized May/June/July 1924 issue, which was 50 cents. In September 1939 the price was reduced to 15 cents, where it stayed until the September 1947 issue, which was 20 cents. The price went up again to 25 cents in May 1949; the digest-sized issues from September 1953 to September 1954 were 35 cents. The first three paperbacks edited by Lin Carter were priced at $2.50; the fourth was $2.95. The two Bellerophon issues were $2.50 and $2.95. The Terminus Weird Tales began in Spring 1988 priced at $3.50; this went up to $4.00 with the Fall 1988 issue, and to $4.95 with the Summer 1990 issue. The next price increase was to $5.95, in Spring 2003, and then to $6.99 with the January 2008 issue. The first two issues from Nth Dimension Media were priced at $7.95 and $6.99; the last two were $9.99 each. | How many more dollars was the first issue for Nth Dimension Media than the last? | 0c3bb854-aff5-46e5-88fb-dec49f07d38c | {
"number": "2.04",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [],
"date": [],
"spans": [],
"worker_id": [],
"hit_id": []
} |
Subsets and Splits
No saved queries yet
Save your SQL queries to embed, download, and access them later. Queries will appear here once saved.