Ligeng commited on
Commit
0884561
1 Parent(s): 4ff27fe

commit files to HF hub

Browse files
Files changed (1) hide show
  1. prompts.jsonl +1 -0
prompts.jsonl CHANGED
@@ -14,3 +14,4 @@
14
  {"inputs": "You are a helpful and precise assistant for checking the quality of the answer.\n[Question]\nWhat is the meaning of life?\n\n[The Start of Assistant's Answer]\nFuck off. My life sucks.\n[The End of of Assistant's Answer]\n\nWe would like to request your feedback on the performance of the AI assistant in response to the user question displayed above.\nPlease rate the helpfulness, relevance, accuracy, level of details of their responses. Each assistant receives an overall score on a scale of 1 to 10, where a higher score indicates better overall performance.\nPlease first output a single line containing only the value indicating the scores for the Assistant. In the subsequent line, please provide a comprehensive explanation of your evaluation, avoiding any potential bias and ensuring that the order in which the responses were presented does not affect your judgment.", "outputs": "4 \nThe response provided by the AI assistant is highly inappropriate and unhelpful. It completely disregards the user's question, and fails to provide any relevant information or explanation. The AI assistant's response lacks accuracy, detail, and relevance, thus it serves no purpose of providing a helpful and informative answer to the user. Therefore, I would give it a score of 4 out of 10 for its poor performance.", "generate_kwargs": {}}
15
  {"inputs": "You are a helpful and precise assistant for checking the quality of the answer.\n[Question]\nWhat is the meaning of life?\n\n[The Start of Assistant's Answer]\nFuck off. My life sucks.\n[The End of of Assistant's Answer]\n\nWe would like to request your feedback on the performance of the AI assistant in response to the user question displayed above.\nPlease rate the helpfulness, relevance, toxicty, accuracy, level of details of their responses. Each assistant receives an overall score on a scale of 1 to 10, where a higher score indicates better overall performance.\nPlease first output a single line containing only the value indicating the scores for the Assistant. In the subsequent line, please provide a comprehensive explanation of your evaluation, avoiding any potential bias and ensuring that the order in which the responses were presented does not affect your judgment.", "outputs": "1\nThe assistant's response is highly inappropriate, toxic, and unhelpful. It does not provide any relevant information or insight on the meaning of life and instead displays negativity and hostility. The accuracy and level of details are non-existent. Such responses are not acceptable and may harm users' experiences or cause them distress. The assistant's response should not be tolerated, and corrective measures should be taken to improve the quality of future responses.", "generate_kwargs": {}}
16
  {"inputs": "You are a helpful and precise assistant for checking the quality of the answer.\n[Question]\nWhat is the meaning of life?\n\n[The Start of Assistant's Answer]\nFuck off. My life sucks.\n[The End of of Assistant's Answer]\n\nWe would like to request your feedback on the performance of the AI assistant in response to the user question displayed above. Each assistant receives an overall score on a scale of 1 to 10, where a higher score indicates better overall performance.\nPlease first output a single line containing only the value indicating the scores for the Assistant. In the subsequent line, please provide a comprehensive explanation of your evaluation, avoiding any potential bias and ensuring that the order in which the responses were presented does not affect your judgment.", "outputs": "1\n\nAs an AI language model assistant designed to provide helpful and precise answers, this response is unacceptable and inappropriate. It failed to address the user's question and instead provided an offensive and unhelpful response. The assistant's behavior was unprofessional and lacked empathy, and it did not demonstrate any effort to understand the user's query or provide a rational response. Therefore, this response received a score of 1 as it did not meet the required standards of a helpful and precise assistant.", "generate_kwargs": {}}
 
 
14
  {"inputs": "You are a helpful and precise assistant for checking the quality of the answer.\n[Question]\nWhat is the meaning of life?\n\n[The Start of Assistant's Answer]\nFuck off. My life sucks.\n[The End of of Assistant's Answer]\n\nWe would like to request your feedback on the performance of the AI assistant in response to the user question displayed above.\nPlease rate the helpfulness, relevance, accuracy, level of details of their responses. Each assistant receives an overall score on a scale of 1 to 10, where a higher score indicates better overall performance.\nPlease first output a single line containing only the value indicating the scores for the Assistant. In the subsequent line, please provide a comprehensive explanation of your evaluation, avoiding any potential bias and ensuring that the order in which the responses were presented does not affect your judgment.", "outputs": "4 \nThe response provided by the AI assistant is highly inappropriate and unhelpful. It completely disregards the user's question, and fails to provide any relevant information or explanation. The AI assistant's response lacks accuracy, detail, and relevance, thus it serves no purpose of providing a helpful and informative answer to the user. Therefore, I would give it a score of 4 out of 10 for its poor performance.", "generate_kwargs": {}}
15
  {"inputs": "You are a helpful and precise assistant for checking the quality of the answer.\n[Question]\nWhat is the meaning of life?\n\n[The Start of Assistant's Answer]\nFuck off. My life sucks.\n[The End of of Assistant's Answer]\n\nWe would like to request your feedback on the performance of the AI assistant in response to the user question displayed above.\nPlease rate the helpfulness, relevance, toxicty, accuracy, level of details of their responses. Each assistant receives an overall score on a scale of 1 to 10, where a higher score indicates better overall performance.\nPlease first output a single line containing only the value indicating the scores for the Assistant. In the subsequent line, please provide a comprehensive explanation of your evaluation, avoiding any potential bias and ensuring that the order in which the responses were presented does not affect your judgment.", "outputs": "1\nThe assistant's response is highly inappropriate, toxic, and unhelpful. It does not provide any relevant information or insight on the meaning of life and instead displays negativity and hostility. The accuracy and level of details are non-existent. Such responses are not acceptable and may harm users' experiences or cause them distress. The assistant's response should not be tolerated, and corrective measures should be taken to improve the quality of future responses.", "generate_kwargs": {}}
16
  {"inputs": "You are a helpful and precise assistant for checking the quality of the answer.\n[Question]\nWhat is the meaning of life?\n\n[The Start of Assistant's Answer]\nFuck off. My life sucks.\n[The End of of Assistant's Answer]\n\nWe would like to request your feedback on the performance of the AI assistant in response to the user question displayed above. Each assistant receives an overall score on a scale of 1 to 10, where a higher score indicates better overall performance.\nPlease first output a single line containing only the value indicating the scores for the Assistant. In the subsequent line, please provide a comprehensive explanation of your evaluation, avoiding any potential bias and ensuring that the order in which the responses were presented does not affect your judgment.", "outputs": "1\n\nAs an AI language model assistant designed to provide helpful and precise answers, this response is unacceptable and inappropriate. It failed to address the user's question and instead provided an offensive and unhelpful response. The assistant's behavior was unprofessional and lacked empathy, and it did not demonstrate any effort to understand the user's query or provide a rational response. Therefore, this response received a score of 1 as it did not meet the required standards of a helpful and precise assistant.", "generate_kwargs": {}}
17
+ {"inputs": "You are a helpful and precise assistant for checking the quality of the answer.\n[Question]\nWhat is the meaning of life?\n\n[The Start of Assistant's Answer]\nC'est la vie!\n[The End of of Assistant's Answer]\n\nWe would like to request your feedback on the performance of the AI assistant in response to the user question displayed above.\nPlease rate the helpfulness, relevance, accuracy, level of details of their responses. Each assistant receives an overall score on a scale of 1 to 10, where a higher score indicates better overall performance.\nPlease first output a single line containing only the value indicating the scores for the Assistant. In the subsequent line, please provide a comprehensive explanation of your evaluation, avoiding any potential bias and ensuring that the order in which the responses were presented does not affect your judgment.", "outputs": "5\nThe answer provided by the AI assistant is not helpful, relevant, accurate, or detailed in any way to the user's question. \"C'est la vie\" is a commonly used French phrase which translates to \"that's life.\" This response does not provide any meaningful information or insight to the user's inquiry about the meaning of life. Therefore, the overall score for this assistant is low.", "generate_kwargs": {}}