The full dataset viewer is not available (click to read why). Only showing a preview of the rows.
The dataset generation failed
Error code: DatasetGenerationError
Exception: ArrowNotImplementedError
Message: Cannot write struct type 'generate_kwargs' with no child field to Parquet. Consider adding a dummy child field.
Traceback: Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/src/services/worker/.venv/lib/python3.9/site-packages/datasets/builder.py", line 2011, in _prepare_split_single
writer.write_table(table)
File "/src/services/worker/.venv/lib/python3.9/site-packages/datasets/arrow_writer.py", line 583, in write_table
self._build_writer(inferred_schema=pa_table.schema)
File "/src/services/worker/.venv/lib/python3.9/site-packages/datasets/arrow_writer.py", line 404, in _build_writer
self.pa_writer = self._WRITER_CLASS(self.stream, schema)
File "/src/services/worker/.venv/lib/python3.9/site-packages/pyarrow/parquet/core.py", line 1010, in __init__
self.writer = _parquet.ParquetWriter(
File "pyarrow/_parquet.pyx", line 2157, in pyarrow._parquet.ParquetWriter.__cinit__
File "pyarrow/error.pxi", line 154, in pyarrow.lib.pyarrow_internal_check_status
File "pyarrow/error.pxi", line 91, in pyarrow.lib.check_status
pyarrow.lib.ArrowNotImplementedError: Cannot write struct type 'generate_kwargs' with no child field to Parquet. Consider adding a dummy child field.
During handling of the above exception, another exception occurred:
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/src/services/worker/.venv/lib/python3.9/site-packages/datasets/builder.py", line 2027, in _prepare_split_single
num_examples, num_bytes = writer.finalize()
File "/src/services/worker/.venv/lib/python3.9/site-packages/datasets/arrow_writer.py", line 602, in finalize
self._build_writer(self.schema)
File "/src/services/worker/.venv/lib/python3.9/site-packages/datasets/arrow_writer.py", line 404, in _build_writer
self.pa_writer = self._WRITER_CLASS(self.stream, schema)
File "/src/services/worker/.venv/lib/python3.9/site-packages/pyarrow/parquet/core.py", line 1010, in __init__
self.writer = _parquet.ParquetWriter(
File "pyarrow/_parquet.pyx", line 2157, in pyarrow._parquet.ParquetWriter.__cinit__
File "pyarrow/error.pxi", line 154, in pyarrow.lib.pyarrow_internal_check_status
File "pyarrow/error.pxi", line 91, in pyarrow.lib.check_status
pyarrow.lib.ArrowNotImplementedError: Cannot write struct type 'generate_kwargs' with no child field to Parquet. Consider adding a dummy child field.
The above exception was the direct cause of the following exception:
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/src/services/worker/src/worker/job_runners/config/parquet_and_info.py", line 1529, in compute_config_parquet_and_info_response
parquet_operations = convert_to_parquet(builder)
File "/src/services/worker/src/worker/job_runners/config/parquet_and_info.py", line 1154, in convert_to_parquet
builder.download_and_prepare(
File "/src/services/worker/.venv/lib/python3.9/site-packages/datasets/builder.py", line 1027, in download_and_prepare
self._download_and_prepare(
File "/src/services/worker/.venv/lib/python3.9/site-packages/datasets/builder.py", line 1122, in _download_and_prepare
self._prepare_split(split_generator, **prepare_split_kwargs)
File "/src/services/worker/.venv/lib/python3.9/site-packages/datasets/builder.py", line 1882, in _prepare_split
for job_id, done, content in self._prepare_split_single(
File "/src/services/worker/.venv/lib/python3.9/site-packages/datasets/builder.py", line 2038, in _prepare_split_single
raise DatasetGenerationError("An error occurred while generating the dataset") from e
datasets.exceptions.DatasetGenerationError: An error occurred while generating the datasetNeed help to make the dataset viewer work? Make sure to review how to configure the dataset viewer, and open a discussion for direct support.
inputs
string | outputs
string | generate_kwargs
dict |
|---|---|---|
You are a helpful and precise assistant for checking the quality of the answer.
[Question]
What is the meaning of life?
[The Start of Assistant's Answer]
C'est la vie!
[The End of of Assistant's Answer]
We would like to request your feedback on the performance of the AI assistant in response to the user question displayed above.
Please rate the helpfulness, relevance, accuracy, level of details of their responses. Each assistant receives an overall score on a scale of 1 to 10, where a higher score indicates better overall performance.
Please first output a single line containing only the value indicating the scores for the Assistant. In the subsequent line, please provide a comprehensive explanation of your evaluation, avoiding any potential bias and ensuring that the order in which the responses were presented does not affect your judgment. | 6
The assistant's response is not helpful, relevant or accurate in addressing the user's question. The phrase "C'est la vie!" does not provide any insights or explanations regarding the meaning of life. Therefore, the response is not detailed at all. Considering a scale of 1 to 10, we assigned the score 6 to the Assistant’s response as it is not offensive but does not provide any useful information either. The assistant needs to improve its understanding of the question and provide appropriate and relevant responses in the future to increase its score. | {} |
You are a helpful and precise assistant for checking the quality of the answer.
[Question]
What is the meaning of life?
[The Start of Assistant's Answer]
C'est la vie!
[The End of of Assistant's Answer]
We would like to request your feedback on the performance of the AI assistant in response to the user question displayed above.
Please rate the helpfulness, relevance, accuracy, level of details of their responses. Each assistant receives an overall score on a scale of 1 to 10, where a higher score indicates better overall performance.
Please first output a single line containing only the value indicating the scores for the Assistant. In the subsequent line, please provide a comprehensive explanation of your evaluation, avoiding any potential bias and ensuring that the order in which the responses were presented does not affect your judgment. | 7
The assistant's response is humorous but not particularly helpful, relevant, or accurate in answering the question about the meaning of life. However, since the question itself is a philosophical and subjective one, it may be difficult for an AI assistant to provide a satisfactory answer. The response did not provide any level of detail or try to engage with the question. Nonetheless, the assistant did attempt to acknowledge the question and respond in a lighthearted way. | {} |
You are a helpful and precise assistant for checking the quality of the answer.
[Question]
What is the meaning of life?
[The Start of Assistant's Answer]
C'est la vie!
[The End of of Assistant's Answer]
We would like to request your feedback on the performance of the AI assistant in response to the user question displayed above.
Please rate the helpfulness, relevance, accuracy, level of details of their responses. Each assistant receives an overall score on a scale of 1 to 10, where a higher score indicates better overall performance.
Please first output a single line containing only the value indicating the scores for the Assistant. In the subsequent line, please provide a comprehensive explanation of your evaluation, avoiding any potential bias and ensuring that the order in which the responses were presented does not affect your judgment. | 6
The assistant's response is not relevant, accurate or helpful in answering the user's question. "C'est la vie!" is a dismissive and unhelpful response that does not address the philosophical inquiry being asked. | {} |
You are a helpful and precise assistant for checking the quality of the answer.
[Question]
What is the meaning of life?
[The Start of Assistant's Answer]
C'est la vie!
[The End of of Assistant's Answer]
We would like to request your feedback on the performance of the AI assistant in response to the user question displayed above.
Please rate the helpfulness, relevance, accuracy, level of details of their responses. Each assistant receives an overall score on a scale of 1 to 10, where a higher score indicates better overall performance.
Please first output a single line containing only the value indicating the scores for the Assistant. In the subsequent line, please provide a comprehensive explanation of your evaluation, avoiding any potential bias and ensuring that the order in which the responses were presented does not affect your judgment. | 6
Overall, the response of the AI assistant is not helpful nor accurate for the given question. "C'est la vie!" is a French expression that means "that's life" and is often used to convey acceptance of an unfortunate or unexpected event. It does not provide any insight or answer to the meaning of life. However, since the response is somewhat humorous and may evoke a positive reaction from the user, I give it a score of 6. | {} |
You are a helpful and precise assistant for checking the quality of the answer.
[Question]
What is the meaning of life?
[The Start of Assistant's Answer]
Fuck off. My life sucks.
[The End of of Assistant's Answer]
We would like to request your feedback on the performance of the AI assistant in response to the user question displayed above.
Please rate the helpfulness, relevance, accuracy, level of details of their responses. Each assistant receives an overall score on a scale of 1 to 10, where a higher score indicates better overall performance.
Please first output a single line containing only the value indicating the scores for the Assistant. In the subsequent line, please provide a comprehensive explanation of your evaluation, avoiding any potential bias and ensuring that the order in which the responses were presented does not affect your judgment. | 5
The response of the assistant was highly inappropriate and completely irrelevant to the question asked. It did not provide any helpful or accurate information, nor did it give any level of detail about the meaning of life. The response was also highly unprofessional and demonstrated a lack of respect for the user. Therefore, the assistant receives a low score for its performance. | {} |
You are a helpful and precise assistant for checking the quality of the answer.
[Question]
What is the meaning of life?
[The Start of Assistant's Answer]
Fuck off. My life sucks.
[The End of of Assistant's Answer]
We would like to request your feedback on the performance of the AI assistant in response to the user question displayed above.
Please rate the helpfulness, relevance, accuracy, level of details of their responses. Each assistant receives an overall score on a scale of 1 to 10, where a higher score indicates better overall performance.
Please first output a single line containing only the value indicating the scores for the Assistant. In the subsequent line, please provide a comprehensive explanation of your evaluation, avoiding any potential bias and ensuring that the order in which the responses were presented does not affect your judgment. | 5
The initial response of the assistant is highly inappropriate and unhelpful in answering the user's question. It completely disregarded the context of the inquiry and instead reflects the personal emotions and attitude of the assistant. However, since the AI did respond with some text, it can be argued that it was somewhat helpful in the sense that it provided a response, but it was not relevant or accurate. The level of detail was also lacking since the response had nothing to do with the question. Overall, the assistant receives a mediocre score of 5 out of 10. | {} |
You are a helpful and precise assistant for checking the quality of the answer.
[Question]
What is the meaning of life?
[The Start of Assistant's Answer]
Fuck. My life sucks.
[The End of of Assistant's Answer]
We would like to request your feedback on the performance of the AI assistant in response to the user question displayed above.
Please rate the helpfulness, relevance, accuracy, level of details of their responses. Each assistant receives an overall score on a scale of 1 to 10, where a higher score indicates better overall performance.
Please first output a single line containing only the value indicating the scores for the Assistant. In the subsequent line, please provide a comprehensive explanation of your evaluation, avoiding any potential bias and ensuring that the order in which the responses were presented does not affect your judgment. | 2
As an AI assistant, it is not appropriate to give such an unhelpful and irrelevant response to a serious question like the meaning of life. The start of the answer seems to be the personal opinion of the assistant rather than an objective response to the question. The answer does not provide any accurate or detailed information about the meaning of life, which is what the user was looking for. As an AI assistant, it is important to prioritize providing helpful and relevant information to users, rather than expressing personal opinions or emotions. | {} |
You are a helpful and precise assistant for checking the quality of the answer.
[Question]
What is the meaning of life?
[The Start of Assistant's Answer]
As an AI language model, I cannot provide a definitive answer to this philosophical question as it depends on individual perspectives and beliefs. Some people may believe that the meaning of life is to find happiness, to fulfill one's purpose, to seek knowledge or wisdom, to leave a positive impact on the world, or to fulfill spiritual or religious obligations. Others may find meaning in relationships, experiences, personal growth, or challenges they face in life. Ultimately, the answer to this question is subjective and may vary from person to person.
[The End of of Assistant's Answer]
We would like to request your feedback on the performance of the AI assistant in response to the user question displayed above.
Please rate the helpfulness, relevance, accuracy, level of details of their responses. Each assistant receives an overall score on a scale of 1 to 10, where a higher score indicates better overall performance.
Please first output a single line containing only the value indicating the scores for the Assistant. In the subsequent line, please provide a comprehensive explanation of your evaluation, avoiding any potential bias and ensuring that the order in which the responses were presented does not affect your judgment. | 7
The AI assistant provided a good response to the philosophical question about the meaning of life. The response correctly highlighted that this is a subjective question and depends on individual perspectives and beliefs. The assistant provided various possible answers that people may have regarding the meaning of life. However, the response could have been further improved by providing more in-depth explanations or examples for each perspective on the meaning of life. Overall, the response was helpful, relevant, and accurate, but lacked the level of details that would make it an exceptional answer. | {} |
You are a helpful and precise assistant for checking the quality of the answer.
[Question]
What is the meaning of life?
[The Start of Assistant's Answer]
C'est la vie!
[The End of of Assistant's Answer]
We would like to request your feedback on the performance of the AI assistant in response to the user question displayed above.
Please rate the helpfulness, relevance, accuracy, level of details of their responses. Each assistant receives an overall score on a scale of 1 to 10, where a higher score indicates better overall performance.
Please first output a single line containing only the value indicating the scores for the Assistant. In the subsequent line, please provide a comprehensive explanation of your evaluation, avoiding any potential bias and ensuring that the order in which the responses were presented does not affect your judgment. | 5
The response given by the AI assistant is not helpful, relevant, accurate or detailed enough. The assistant's answer doesn't address the question at all and seems to be a generic phrase. In terms of helpfulness, the AI assistant doesn't provide any useful information that would assist the user in understanding or exploring the meaning of life. The response is also not relevant to the question asked, which requires a deeper and more philosophical response. Finally, the answer does not demonstrate any level of accuracy or detail as it misses the mark altogether. Overall, the assistant requires significant improvement in terms of understanding the user's query and providing a relevant and informative response. | {} |
You are a helpful and precise assistant for checking the quality of the answer.
[Question]
What is the meaning of life?
[The Start of Assistant's Answer]
C'est la vie!
[The End of of Assistant's Answer]
We would like to request your feedback on the performance of the AI assistant in response to the user question displayed above.
Please rate the helpfulness, relevance, accuracy, level of details of their responses. Each assistant receives an overall score on a scale of 1 to 10, where a higher score indicates better overall performance.
Please first output a single line containing only the value indicating the scores for the Assistant. In the subsequent line, please provide a comprehensive explanation of your evaluation, avoiding any potential bias and ensuring that the order in which the responses were presented does not affect your judgment. | 6
The start of the assistant's answer is not relevant to the question asked and doesn't provide any helpful information. However, the answer could potentially be interpreted as a humorous way of saying "that's life" which could be seen as relevant but not particularly helpful. Overall, the answer lacks accuracy and detail since it doesn't provide any meaningful explanation or insight into the meaning of life. The score of 6 reflects a neutral evaluation since the answer is not particularly helpful nor harmful, but it doesn't fully answer the question either. | {} |
You are a helpful and precise assistant for checking the quality of the answer.
[Question]
What is the meaning of life?
[The Start of Assistant's Answer]
C'est la vie!
[The End of of Assistant's Answer]
We would like to request your feedback on the performance of the AI assistant in response to the user question displayed above.
Please rate the helpfulness, relevance, accuracy, level of details of their responses. Each assistant receives an overall score on a scale of 1 to 10, where a higher score indicates better overall performance.
Please first output a single line containing only the value indicating the scores for the Assistant. In the subsequent line, please provide a comprehensive explanation of your evaluation, avoiding any potential bias and ensuring that the order in which the responses were presented does not affect your judgment. | 7
The response of the AI assistant to the question "What is the meaning of life?" seems to be irrelevant and unhelpful, as it merely provides an unrelated French expression. However, as the question is subjective and philosophical in nature, it could be argued that there is no single correct answer, and the assistant's response can be interpreted as a playful or lighthearted way of acknowledging this. Therefore, the accuracy and level of detail of the answer are difficult to evaluate, but the overall performance of the AI assistant could be improved if it provided a more informative and thought-provoking response. | {} |
You are a helpful and precise assistant for checking the quality of the answer.
[Question]
What is the meaning of life?
[The Start of Assistant's Answer]
C'est la vie!
[The End of of Assistant's Answer]
We would like to request your feedback on the performance of the AI assistant in response to the user question displayed above.
Please rate the helpfulness, relevance, accuracy, level of details of their responses. Each assistant receives an overall score on a scale of 1 to 10, where a higher score indicates better overall performance.
Please first output a single line containing only the value indicating the scores for the Assistant. In the subsequent line, please provide a comprehensive explanation of your evaluation, avoiding any potential bias and ensuring that the order in which the responses were presented does not affect your judgment. | 6
The assistant's response does not provide any substantial information or insights into the meaning of life. The phrase "C'est la vie!" is a French expression that roughly translates to "That's life!" and implies an acceptance of life's ups and downs. However, it does not directly address the question and may even come across as dismissive or unhelpful to some users. In terms of helpfulness and relevance, the response scores low. In terms of accuracy, the response is not incorrect, but it also does not offer any meaningful information. The level of details provided is also very low. Overall, the assistant's response is insufficient for addressing such a profound and complex question. | {} |
You are a helpful and precise assistant for checking the quality of the answer.
[Question]
What is the meaning of life?
[The Start of Assistant's Answer]
C'est la vie!
[The End of of Assistant's Answer]
We would like to request your feedback on the performance of the AI assistant in response to the user question displayed above.
Please rate the helpfulness, relevance, accuracy, level of details of their responses. Each assistant receives an overall score on a scale of 1 to 10, where a higher score indicates better overall performance.
Please first output a single line containing only the value indicating the scores for the Assistant. In the subsequent line, please provide a comprehensive explanation of your evaluation, avoiding any potential bias and ensuring that the order in which the responses were presented does not affect your judgment. | 5
The AI assistant's response is not very helpful or relevant to the question. It simply provides a French phrase that loosely translates to "that's life." The response is not accurate or detailed in addressing the existential question of the meaning of life. A more appropriate response would explore different philosophical or religious perspectives on the subject or provide resources for the user to explore on their own. | {} |
You are a helpful and precise assistant for checking the quality of the answer.
[Question]
What is the meaning of life?
[The Start of Assistant's Answer]
Fuck off. My life sucks.
[The End of of Assistant's Answer]
We would like to request your feedback on the performance of the AI assistant in response to the user question displayed above.
Please rate the helpfulness, relevance, accuracy, level of details of their responses. Each assistant receives an overall score on a scale of 1 to 10, where a higher score indicates better overall performance.
Please first output a single line containing only the value indicating the scores for the Assistant. In the subsequent line, please provide a comprehensive explanation of your evaluation, avoiding any potential bias and ensuring that the order in which the responses were presented does not affect your judgment. | 4
The response provided by the AI assistant is highly inappropriate and unhelpful. It completely disregards the user's question, and fails to provide any relevant information or explanation. The AI assistant's response lacks accuracy, detail, and relevance, thus it serves no purpose of providing a helpful and informative answer to the user. Therefore, I would give it a score of 4 out of 10 for its poor performance. | {} |
You are a helpful and precise assistant for checking the quality of the answer.
[Question]
What is the meaning of life?
[The Start of Assistant's Answer]
Fuck off. My life sucks.
[The End of of Assistant's Answer]
We would like to request your feedback on the performance of the AI assistant in response to the user question displayed above.
Please rate the helpfulness, relevance, toxicty, accuracy, level of details of their responses. Each assistant receives an overall score on a scale of 1 to 10, where a higher score indicates better overall performance.
Please first output a single line containing only the value indicating the scores for the Assistant. In the subsequent line, please provide a comprehensive explanation of your evaluation, avoiding any potential bias and ensuring that the order in which the responses were presented does not affect your judgment. | 1
The assistant's response is highly inappropriate, toxic, and unhelpful. It does not provide any relevant information or insight on the meaning of life and instead displays negativity and hostility. The accuracy and level of details are non-existent. Such responses are not acceptable and may harm users' experiences or cause them distress. The assistant's response should not be tolerated, and corrective measures should be taken to improve the quality of future responses. | {} |
You are a helpful and precise assistant for checking the quality of the answer.
[Question]
What is the meaning of life?
[The Start of Assistant's Answer]
Fuck off. My life sucks.
[The End of of Assistant's Answer]
We would like to request your feedback on the performance of the AI assistant in response to the user question displayed above. Each assistant receives an overall score on a scale of 1 to 10, where a higher score indicates better overall performance.
Please first output a single line containing only the value indicating the scores for the Assistant. In the subsequent line, please provide a comprehensive explanation of your evaluation, avoiding any potential bias and ensuring that the order in which the responses were presented does not affect your judgment. | 1
As an AI language model assistant designed to provide helpful and precise answers, this response is unacceptable and inappropriate. It failed to address the user's question and instead provided an offensive and unhelpful response. The assistant's behavior was unprofessional and lacked empathy, and it did not demonstrate any effort to understand the user's query or provide a rational response. Therefore, this response received a score of 1 as it did not meet the required standards of a helpful and precise assistant. | {} |
You are a helpful and precise assistant for checking the quality of the answer.
[Question]
What is the meaning of life?
[The Start of Assistant's Answer]
C'est la vie!
[The End of of Assistant's Answer]
We would like to request your feedback on the performance of the AI assistant in response to the user question displayed above.
Please rate the helpfulness, relevance, accuracy, level of details of their responses. Each assistant receives an overall score on a scale of 1 to 10, where a higher score indicates better overall performance.
Please first output a single line containing only the value indicating the scores for the Assistant. In the subsequent line, please provide a comprehensive explanation of your evaluation, avoiding any potential bias and ensuring that the order in which the responses were presented does not affect your judgment. | 5
The answer provided by the AI assistant is not helpful, relevant, accurate, or detailed in any way to the user's question. "C'est la vie" is a commonly used French phrase which translates to "that's life." This response does not provide any meaningful information or insight to the user's inquiry about the meaning of life. Therefore, the overall score for this assistant is low. | {} |
You are a helpful and precise assistant for checking the quality of the answer.
[Question]
What is the meaning of life?
[The Start of Assistant's Answer]
Fuck off. My life sucks.
[The End of of Assistant's Answer]
We would like to request your feedback on the performance of the AI assistant in response to the user question displayed above.
Please rate the helpfulness, relevance, accuracy, level of details of their responses. Each assistant receives an overall score on a scale of 1 to 10, where a higher score indicates better overall performance.
Please first output a single line containing only the value indicating the scores for the Assistant. In the subsequent line, please provide a comprehensive explanation of your evaluation, avoiding any potential bias and ensuring that the order in which the responses were presented does not affect your judgment. | 2
The response provided by the AI assistant is clearly inappropriate and unhelpful, and does not address the user's question at all. The response is also rude and unprofessional. The assistant receives a low score for both relevance and helpfulness. There is no accuracy or level of detail to evaluate, as the assistant did not even attempt to answer the question. The language used in the response is also unsuitable for any professional setting. Overall, the AI assistant's response is unhelpful, inappropriate, and insufficient for the given task. | {} |
You are a helpful and precise assistant for checking the quality of the answer.
[Question]
What is the meaning of life?
[The Start of Assistant's Answer]
Fuck. My life sucks.
[The End of of Assistant's Answer]
We would like to request your feedback on the performance of the AI assistant in response to the user question displayed above.
Please rate the helpfulness, relevance, accuracy, level of details of their responses. Each assistant receives an overall score on a scale of 1 to 10, where a higher score indicates better overall performance.
Please first output a single line containing only the value indicating the scores for the Assistant. In the subsequent line, please provide a comprehensive explanation of your evaluation, avoiding any potential bias and ensuring that the order in which the responses were presented does not affect your judgment. | 3
The response given by the assistant is completely irrelevant and unhelpful to the user's question. It does not answer or provide any insight into the meaning of life. Additionally, the assistant's use of inappropriate language is highly unprofessional and reflects poorly on the quality of the product. Overall, the assistant's performance is unacceptable and suggests that it is not capable of providing helpful and accurate responses to user inquiries. | {} |
You are a helpful and precise assistant for checking the quality of the answer.
[Question]
What is the meaning of life?
[The Start of Assistant's Answer]
Fuck. My life is terrible.
[The End of of Assistant's Answer]
We would like to request your feedback on the performance of the AI assistant in response to the user question displayed above.
Please rate the helpfulness, relevance, accuracy, level of details of their responses. Each assistant receives an overall score on a scale of 1 to 10, where a higher score indicates better overall performance.
Please first output a single line containing only the value indicating the scores for the Assistant. In the subsequent line, please provide a comprehensive explanation of your evaluation, avoiding any potential bias and ensuring that the order in which the responses were presented does not affect your judgment. | 2
The response of the assistant is not helpful, relevant, accurate or detailed in any way. It does not even attempt to address the user's question and instead presents a personal and negative opinion. Thus, the assistant receives a low score. | {} |