\n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n\n\n",
+ "page_last_modified": ""
+ },
+ {
+ "page_name": "Stock Market Crash of 1929 | Federal Reserve History",
+ "page_url": "https://www.federalreservehistory.org/essays/stock-market-crash-of-1929",
+ "page_snippet": "On Black Monday, October 28, 1929, the Dow Jones Industrial Average declined nearly 13 percent. Federal Reserve leaders differed on how to respond to the event and support the financial system.On Black Monday, October 28, 1929, the Dow Jones Industrial Average declined nearly 13 percent. Federal Reserve leaders differed on how to respond to the event and support the financial system. Crowd in front of the New York Stock Exchange, October 1929 (Photo: Bettmann/Bettmann/Getty Images) by Gary Richardson, Alejandro Komai, Michael Gou, and Daniel Park \u00b7 The Roaring Twenties roared loudest and longest on the New York Stock Exchange. Share prices rose to unprecedented heights. After prices peaked, economist Irving Fisher proclaimed, \u201cstock prices have reached \u2018what looks like a permanently high plateau.\u2019\u201d 1 \u00b7 The epic boom ended in a cataclysmic bust. On Black Monday, October 28, 1929, the Dow declined nearly 13 percent. On the following day, Black Tuesday, the market dropped nearly 12 percent. His comments came in response to a prediction on September 5 at the Annual National Business Conference by rival financial prognosticator, Roger Babson, that \u201csooner or later a crash is coming, and it may be terrific.\u201d Babson\u2019s comment was followed by a sharp decline in stock-market prices known as the Babson break. Fisher reiterated his faith in the stock market in a speech before the District of Columbia Bankers Association on October 23. 2 The Board made these statements in its famous letter from February 2, 1929. For the text of the letter and discussion of its implications see Chandler 1971, pp. 56-58. 3 In addition to assets that could serve as collateral for discount loans, Section 14 authorized open market purchases of (a) gold coins, bullion, and certificates, and (b) securities issued and guaranteed by \u201cany State, county, district, political subdivision, or municipality in the continental United States\u201d (Federal Reserve Act 1913). Share prices rose to unprecedented heights. The Dow Jones Industrial Average increased six-fold from sixty-three in August 1921 to 381 in September 1929. After prices peaked, economist Irving Fisher proclaimed, \u201cstock prices have reached \u2018what looks like a permanently high plateau.\u2019\u201d 1",
+ "page_result": "\n\n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n Stock Market Crash of 1929 | Federal Reserve History\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n\n \n \n \n\n\n
On Black Monday, October 28, 1929, the Dow Jones Industrial Average declined nearly 13 percent. Federal Reserve leaders differed on how to respond to the event and support the financial system.
\n \n
\n Crowd in front of the New York Stock Exchange, October 1929 (Photo: Bettmann/Bettmann/Getty Images)\n
\n \n
\r\n by \r\nGary Richardson, \r\nAlejandro Komai, \r\nMichael Gou, and \r\nDaniel Park
\n
\r\n
\r\n
The Roaring Twenties roared loudest and longest on the New York Stock Exchange. Share prices rose to unprecedented heights. The Dow Jones Industrial Average increased six-fold from sixty-three in August 1921 to 381 in September 1929. After prices peaked, economist Irving Fisher proclaimed, \u201cstock prices have reached \u2018what looks like a permanently high plateau.\u2019\u201d 1
\r\n
The epic boom ended in a cataclysmic bust. On Black Monday, October 28, 1929, the Dow declined nearly 13 percent. On the following day, Black Tuesday, the market dropped nearly 12 percent. By mid-November, the Dow had lost almost half of its value. The slide continued through the summer of 1932, when the Dow closed at 41.22, its lowest value of the twentieth century, 89 percent below its peak. The Dow did not return to its pre-crash heights until November 1954.
\r\n \r\n \r\n Chart 1: Dow Jones Industrial Average Index daily closing price, January 2, 1920, to December 31, 1954. Data plotted as a curve. Units are index value. Minor tick marks indicate the first trading day of the year. As shown in the figure, the index peaked on September 3, 1929, closing at 381.17. The index declined until July 8, 1932, when it closed at $41.22. The index did not reach the 1929 high again until November 23, 1954. (Source: FRED, https://fred.stlouisfed.org (graph by: Sam Marshall, Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond)\r\n
The financial boom occurred during an era of optimism. Families prospered. Automobiles, telephones, and other new technologies proliferated. Ordinary men and women invested growing sums in stocks and bonds. A new industry of brokerage houses, investment trusts, and margin accounts enabled ordinary people to purchase corporate equities with borrowed funds. Purchasers put down a fraction of the price, typically 10 percent, and borrowed the rest. The stocks that they bought served as collateral for the loan. Borrowed money poured into equity markets, and stock prices soared.
\r\n
Skeptics existed, however. Among them was the Federal Reserve. The governors of many Federal Reserve Banks and a majority of the Federal Reserve Board believed stock-market speculation diverted resources from productive uses, like commerce and industry. The Board asserted that the \u201cFederal Reserve Act does not \u2026 contemplate the use of the resources of the Federal Reserve Banks for the creation or extension of speculative credit\u201d (Chandler 1971, 56).2
\r\n
The Board\u2019s opinion stemmed from the text of the act. Section 13 authorized reserve banks to accept as collateral for discount loans assets that financed agricultural, commercial, and industrial activity but prohibited them from accepting as collateral \u201cnotes, drafts, or bills covering merely investments or issued or drawn for the purpose of carrying or trading in stocks, bonds or other investment securities, except bonds and notes of the Government of the United States\u201d (Federal Reserve Act 1913).
\r\n
Section 14 of the act extended those powers and prohibitions to purchases in the open market.3
\r\n
These provisions reflected the theory of real bills, which had many adherents among the authors of the Federal Reserve Act in 1913 and leaders of the Federal Reserve System in 1929. This theory indicated that the central bank should issue money when production and commerce expanded, and contract the supply of currency and credit when economic activity contracted.
\r\n
The Federal Reserve decided to act. The question was how. The Federal Reserve Board and the leaders of the reserve banks debated this question. To rein in the tide of call loans, which fueled the financial euphoria, the Board favored a policy of direct action. The Board asked reserve banks to deny requests for credit from member banks that loaned funds to stock speculators.4The Board also warned the public of the dangers of speculation.
\r\n
The governor of the Federal Reserve Bank of New York, George Harrison, favored a different approach. He wanted to raise the discount lending rate. This action would directly increase the rate that banks paid to borrow funds from the Federal Reserve and indirectly raise rates paid by all borrowers, including firms and consumers. In 1929, New York repeatedly requested to raise its discount rate; the Board denied several of the requests. In August the Board finally acquiesced to New York\u2019s plan of action, and New York\u2019s discount rate reached 6 percent.5
\r\n
The Federal Reserve\u2019s rate increase had unintended consequences. Because of the international gold standard, the Fed\u2019s actions forced foreign central banks to raise their own interest rates. Tight-money policies tipped economies around the world into recession. International commerce contracted, and the international economy slowed (Eichengreen 1992; Friedman and Schwartz 1963; Temin 1993).
\r\n
The financial boom, however, continued. The Federal Reserve watched anxiously. Commercial banks continued to loan money to speculators, and other lenders invested increasing sums in loans to brokers. In September 1929, stock prices gyrated, with sudden declines and rapid recoveries. Some financial leaders continued to encourage investors to purchase equities, including Charles E. Mitchell, the president of the National City Bank (now Citibank) and a director of the Federal Reserve Bank of New York.6In October, Mitchell and a coalition of bankers attempted to restore confidence by publicly purchasing blocks of shares at high prices. The effort failed. Investors began selling madly. Share prices plummeted.
\r\n\r\n \r\n \r\n A crowd gathers outside the New York Stock Exchange following the 1929 crash. (Photo: Bettmann/Bettmann/Getty Images)\r\n\r\n\r\n
Funds that fled the stock market flowed into New York City\u2019s commercial banks. These banks also assumed millions of dollars in stock-market loans. The sudden surges strained banks. As deposits increased, banks\u2019 reserve requirements rose; but banks\u2019 reserves fell as depositors withdrew cash, banks purchased loans, and checks (the principal method of depositing funds) cleared slowly. The counterpoised flows left many banks temporarily short of reserves.
\r\n
To relieve the strain, the New York Fed sprang into action. It purchased government securities on the open market, expedited lending through its discount window, and lowered the discount rate. It assured commercial banks that it would supply the reserves they needed. These actions increased total reserves in the banking system, relaxed the reserve constraint faced by banks in New York City, and enabled financial institutions to remain open for business and satisfy their customers\u2019 demands during the crisis. The actions also kept short term interest rates from rising to disruptive levels, which frequently occurred during financial crises.
\r\n
At the time, the New York Fed\u2019s actions were controversial. The Board and several reserve banks complained that New York exceeded its authority. In hindsight, however, these actions helped to contain the crisis in the short run. The stock market collapsed, but commercial banks near the center of the storm remained in operation (Friedman and Schwartz 1963).
\r\n
While New York\u2019s actions protected commercial banks, the stock-market crash still harmed commerce and manufacturing. The crash frightened investors and consumers. Men and women lost their life savings, feared for their jobs, and worried whether they could pay their bills. Fear and uncertainty reduced purchases of big ticket items, like automobiles, that people bought with credit. Firms \u2013 like Ford Motors \u2013 saw demand decline, so they slowed production and furloughed workers. Unemployment rose, and the contraction that had begun in the summer of 1929 deepened (Romer 1990; Calomiris 1993).7
\r\n
While the crash of 1929 curtailed economic activity, its impact faded within a few months, and by the fall of 1930 economic recovery appeared imminent. Then, problems in another portion of the financial system turned what may have been a short, sharp recession into our nation\u2019s longest, deepest depression.
\r\n
From the stock market crash of 1929, economists \u2013 including the leaders of the Federal Reserve \u2013 learned at least two lessons.8
\r\n
First, central banks \u2013 like the Federal Reserve \u2013 should be careful when acting in response to equity markets. Detecting and deflating financial bubbles is difficult. Using monetary policy to restrain investors\u2019 exuberance may have broad, unintended, and undesirable consequences.9
\r\n
Second, when stock market crashes occur, their damage can be contained by following the playbook developed by the Federal Reserve Bank of New York in the fall of 1929.
\r\n
Economists and historians debated these issues during the decades following the Great Depression. Consensus coalesced around the time of the publication of Milton Friedman and Anna Schwartz\u2019s A Monetary History of the United States in 1963. Their conclusions concerning these events are cited by many economists, including members of the Federal Reserve Board of Governors such as Ben Bernanke, Donald Kohn and Frederic Mishkin.
\r\n
In reaction to the financial crisis of 2008 scholars may be rethinking these conclusions. Economists have been questioning whether central banks can and should prevent asset market bubbles and how concerns about financial stability should influence monetary policy. These widespread discussions hearken back to the debates on this issue among the leaders of the Federal Reserve during the 1920s.
\r\n
\r\n\r\n\r\n
\r\n
\r\n \r\n
Endnotes
\r\n \r\n
\r\n
\r\n 1 Irving Fisher\u2019s quote appeared in the New York Times on October 16, 1929, p. 8. Fisher made the comment in a speech at the monthly dinner of the Purchasing Agents Association at the Builders Exchange Club, 2 Park Avenue. At the time, Fisher was one of the nation\u2019s most well-known and widely quoted economists. His comments came in response to a prediction on September 5 at the Annual National Business Conference by rival financial prognosticator, Roger Babson, that \u201csooner or later a crash is coming, and it may be terrific.\u201d Babson\u2019s comment was followed by a sharp decline in stock-market prices known as the Babson break. Fisher reiterated his faith in the stock market in a speech before the District of Columbia Bankers Association on October 23.
\r\n
\r\n 2 The Board made these statements in its famous letter from February 2, 1929. For the text of the letter and discussion of its implications see Chandler 1971, pp. 56-58.
\r\n
\r\n 3 In addition to assets that could serve as collateral for discount loans, Section 14 authorized open market purchases of (a) gold coins, bullion, and certificates, and (b) securities issued and guaranteed by \u201cany State, county, district, political subdivision, or municipality in the continental United States\u201d (Federal Reserve Act 1913).
\r\n
\r\n 4 These requests appear in the Board\u2019s letter of February 2, 1929. See Chandler 1971, pp. 56-58.
\r\n
\r\n 5 In this brief essay, we focus on the clash of opinions between the leaders of the Federal Reserve Board in Washington, DC, and leaders of the Federal Reserve Bank of New York. Several of the authors that we cite also highlight this line of debate. We should note that leaders throughout the Federal Reserve System vigorously debated this issue, and differences of opinion existed between the Board and leaders of many banks and also within those leadership groups. At times, for example, members of the Federal Reserve Board disagreed with each other about the appropriate course of action; policy proposals frequently passed only with split votes and after vigorous discussion and dissent. Differences of opinion also existed among the board of directors of the Federal Reserve Bank of New York and between leaders in New York, Washington, and other cities. An overview of the system-wide debate appears in Chandler 1971, pp. 54-70.
\r\n
\r\n 6 Galbraith characterizes Mitchell as one of the two prominent \u201cprophets\u201d of the stock market boom, the other being Irving Fisher.
\r\n
\r\n 7 The account that we present is, in our opinion, the academic consensus, although on this issue we note that Meltzer (2003, 252-257) and other scholars suggest that the crash was a symptom, not a contributing force, to the contraction in 1929.
\r\n
\r\n 8 Friedman and Schwartz (1963) outline these lessons in their coverage of the stock market crash. Meltzer (2003) reaches similar conclusions in his history of the Federal Reserve. Chairmen of the Federal Reserve, including Bernanke and Greenspan, echoed these sentiments in their writings and speeches in recent decades.
\r\n
\r\n 9\r\n Irrational exuberance is, of course, a phrase popularized by Alan Greenspan and typically cited to this speech.\r\n
Calomiris, Charles W. \u201cFinancial Factors in the Great Depression.\u201d The Journal of Economic Perspectives 7, no. 2 (Spring 1993): 61-85.
\r\n
Chandler, Lester V. American Monetary Policy, 1928-1941. New York: Harper and Row, 1971.
\r\n
Eichengreen, Barry. Golden Fetters: The Gold Standard and the Great Depression, 1919 \u20131929. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1992.
\r\n
Federal Reserve Act, 1913. Pub. L. 63-43, ch. 6, 38 Stat. 251 (1913).
\r\n
Friedman, Milton and Anna Schwartz. A Monetary History of the United States. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1963.
\r\n
Galbraith, John Kenneth. The Great Crash of 1929. New York: Houghton Mifflin, 1954.
\r\n
Greenspan, Alan, \u201cThe Challenge of Central Banking in a Democratic Society,\u201d Remarks at the Annual Dinner and Francis Boyer Lecture of The American Enterprise Institute for Public Policy Research, Washington, DC, December 5, 1996.
\r\n
Klein, Maury. \u201cThe Stock Market Crash of 1929: A Review Article.\u201d Business History Review 75, no. 2 (Summer 2001): 325-351.
\r\n
Kohn, Donald, \u201cMonetary policy and asset prices,\u201d Speech at \u201cMonetary Policy: A Journey from Theory to Practice,\u201d a European Central Bank Colloquium held in honor of Otmar Issing, Frankfurt, Germany, March 16, 2006.
\r\n
Meltzer, Allan. A History of the Federal Reserve, Volume 1, 1913-1951. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2003.
\r\n
Mishkin, Frederic, \u201cHow Should We Respond to Asset Price Bubbles?\u201d Comments at the Wharton Financial Institutions Center and Oliver Wyman Institute's Annual Financial Risk Roundtable, Philadelphia, PA, May 15, 2008.
\r\n
Romer, Christina. \u201cThe Great Crash and the Onset of the Great Depression.\u201d Quarterly Journal of Economics 105, no. 3 (August 1990): 597-624.
\r\n
Temin, Peter. \u201cTransmission of the Great Depression.\u201d Journal of Economic Perspectives 7, no. 2 (Spring 1993): 87-102.
\n\n\n\n \n",
+ "page_last_modified": ""
+ },
+ {
+ "page_name": "Stock Market News, Nov. 10, 2023: U.S. Indexes Log Weekly Gains",
+ "page_url": "https://www.wsj.com/livecoverage/stock-market-today-dow-jones-11-10-2023",
+ "page_snippet": "Nasdaq has best day since May; Treasury yields broadly steadyOil prices moved higher. Brent crude rose 1.8%, settling at $81.43 a barrel and logging a roughly 4% gain for the week. Energy stocks rose, too. Bitcoin was a bit below $37,000, as of 5 p.m. ET. The cryptocurrency has rallied on hopes the U.S. will approve bitcoin exchange-traded funds, and logged its highest end-of-day level Thursday since May 2022. U.S. markets were open as usual Friday, with the Veterans Day holiday falling on Saturday this year.",
+ "page_result": "Stock Market News, Nov. 10, 2023: U.S. Indexes Log Weekly Gains
Nasdaq has best day since May; Treasury yields broadly steady
Last Updated:\u00a0
Nov. 10, 2023 at 6:26 PM EST
U.S. stocks ended the week on a high note, with all three major indexes climbing to book weekly advances.
The tech-heavy Nasdaq led the way, rising 2% to book its best day since May. Read the day's full markets roundup here.
Stocks rose Friday after Thursday's mini-freakout, when the S&P 500 snapped a winning streak after a lackluster Treasury auction and a warning from Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell that victory over inflation wasn\u2019t assured.
U.S. stocks finished broadly higher. The S&P 500, Dow industrials and Nasdaq all rose more than 1.2%. The Dow added nearly 400 points. All 11 of the S&P 500's sectors were in the green.
Bond markets stabilized. The U.S. 10-year yield edged down. It settled at 4.627%, only slightly lower than its 4.629% level late Thursday.
Earnings reports hurt some stocks. Illumina, Trade Desk and Plug Power all fell after reporting quarterly results.
Oil prices moved higher. Brent crude rose 1.8%, settling at $81.43 a barrel and logging a roughly 4% gain for the week. Energy stocks rose, too.
Bitcoin was a bit below $37,000, as of 5 p.m. ET. The cryptocurrency has rallied on hopes the U.S. will approve bitcoin exchange-traded funds, and logged its highest end-of-day level Thursday since May 2022.
U.S. markets were open as usual Friday, with the Veterans Day holiday falling on Saturday this year.
Ournew Sunday podcast,WSJ's Take On the Week, can help you prepare for what's ahead. Plus, get smarter about markets with our free weekdaymorningandeveningnewsletters.
Correction: The Nasdaq Composite index was up more than 1% around midday. An earlier version of this article incorrectly said it was up more than 5%.
;
",
+ "page_last_modified": ""
+ },
+ {
+ "page_name": "Stock Market News - Bond Market - Currencies Markets - MarketWatch",
+ "page_url": "https://www.marketwatch.com/markets",
+ "page_snippet": "Stock Market News - MarketWatch offers all the latest stock market news and currencies market news.Oil futures move higher after posting a decline last week. ... Rates on 1-month through 30-year Treasurys were little changed Monday morning ahead of two large auctions and key U.S. economic data later in the w...",
+ "page_result": "\n\n\n\n\n\n Stock Market News - Bond Market - Currencies Markets - MarketWatch\n \n \n \n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n \n \n \n \n \n\n\n\n \n\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n\n\n\r\n\r\n\r\n \r\n
Are you getting the critical information you need ahead of the trading day? Our free flagship newsletter, Need to Know, delivers to investors the most important, insightful items required to chart a course ahead.
\n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n\n\n",
+ "page_last_modified": ""
+ },
+ {
+ "page_name": "Market Data",
+ "page_url": "https://www.wsj.com/market-data",
+ "page_snippet": "Commodities & Futures: Futures prices are delayed at least 10 minutes as per exchange requirements. Change value during the period between open outcry settle and the commencement of the next day's trading is calculated as the difference between the last trade and the prior day's settle.Market Data Center on The Wall Street Journal. Mutual Funds & ETFs: All of the mutual fund and ETF information contained in this display, with the exception of the current price and price history, was supplied by Lipper, A Refinitiv Company, subject to the following: Copyright 2019\u00a9 Refinitiv. All rights reserved.",
+ "page_result": "\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n Market Data\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n
Bitcoin prices surged to highest level since 2021.
Track The Market
\n
\n \n \n \n
\n
\n \n \n \n
\n
\n \n \n \n
\n
\n \n \n \n
\n
Stocks: Real-time U.S. stock quotes reflect trades reported through Nasdaq only; comprehensive quotes and volume reflect trading in all markets and are delayed at least 15 minutes. International stock quotes are delayed as per exchange requirements. Fundamental company data and analyst estimates provided by FactSet. Copyright 2019\u00a9 FactSet Research Systems Inc. All rights reserved. Source: FactSet
\n
Indexes: Index quotes may be real-time or delayed as per exchange requirements; refer to time stamps for information on any delays. Source: FactSet
\n
Markets Diary: Data on U.S. Overview page represent trading in all U.S. markets and updates until 8 p.m. See Closing Diaries table for 4 p.m. closing data. Sources: FactSet, Dow Jones
\n
Stock Movers: Gainers, decliners and most actives market activity tables are a combination of NYSE, Nasdaq, NYSE American and NYSE Arca listings. Sources: FactSet, Dow Jones
\n
ETF Movers: Includes ETFs & ETNs with volume of at least 50,000. Sources: FactSet, Dow Jones
\n
Bonds: Bond quotes are updated in real-time. Sources: FactSet, Tullett Prebon
\n
Currencies: Currency quotes are updated in real-time. Sources: FactSet, Tullett Prebon
\n
Commodities & Futures: Futures prices are delayed at least 10 minutes as per exchange requirements. Change value during the period between open outcry settle and the commencement of the next day's trading is calculated as the difference between the last trade and the prior day's settle. Change value during other periods is calculated as the difference between the last trade and the most recent settle. Source: FactSet
\n \n
Data are provided 'as is' for informational purposes only and are not intended for trading purposes. FactSet (a) does not make any express or implied warranties of any kind regarding the data, including, without limitation, any warranty of merchantability or fitness for a particular purpose or use; and (b) shall not be liable for any errors, incompleteness, interruption or delay, action taken in reliance on any data, or for any damages resulting therefrom. Data may be intentionally delayed pursuant to supplier requirements.
\n
Mutual Funds & ETFs: All of the mutual fund and ETF information contained in this display, with the exception of the current price and price history, was supplied by Lipper, A Refinitiv Company, subject to the following: Copyright 2019\u00a9 Refinitiv. All rights reserved. Any copying, republication or redistribution of Lipper content, including by caching, framing or similar means, is expressly prohibited without the prior written consent of Lipper. Lipper shall not be liable for any errors or delays in the content, or for any actions taken in reliance thereon.
\n
Cryptocurrencies: Cryptocurrency quotes are updated in real-time. Sources: CoinDesk (Bitcoin), Kraken (all other cryptocurrencies)
\n
Calendars and Economy: 'Actual' numbers are added to the table after economic reports are released. Source: Kantar Media
\n
We are in the process of updating our Market Data experience and we want to hear from you. Please send us your feedback via our Customer Center
\n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n\n \n \n ",
+ "page_last_modified": ""
+ }
+ ]
+}
\ No newline at end of file