diff --git a/SINAI-SA-corpus/1/ref1052_rate1.txt b/SINAI-SA-corpus/1/ref1052_rate1.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..e021729796a18efefe0efb8e617564e3ea039207 --- /dev/null +++ b/SINAI-SA-corpus/1/ref1052_rate1.txt @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ + "Lens Error", August 2, 2008 + ByJBM (Pittsburgh, PA) - See all my reviews +Got the dreaded "lens error" message, and camera no longer works. Before you buy a Canon Elph, google "Canon Powershot lens error" and see what comes up. diff --git a/SINAI-SA-corpus/1/ref1055_rate1.txt b/SINAI-SA-corpus/1/ref1055_rate1.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..7e8fbcc38f55a434eb18440b99bf2f878a17ff0b --- /dev/null +++ b/SINAI-SA-corpus/1/ref1055_rate1.txt @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ + Dreaded Lens Error - Beware!, December 31, 2008 + ByJ. Stahmann (Orem, UT) - See all my reviews +I really liked this camera for the nearly two months that it worked, but unfortunately we were hit with the dreaded Lens Error which renders the camera useless. Unfortunately Canon wants nearly as much to fix this as it would cost to buy a new one, so we have a nice silver paperweight now. diff --git a/SINAI-SA-corpus/1/ref1081_rate1.txt b/SINAI-SA-corpus/1/ref1081_rate1.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..86e693fabcc1693c09888080d6ba47585f126982 --- /dev/null +++ b/SINAI-SA-corpus/1/ref1081_rate1.txt @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ + Stopped Working After 6 Months Because of Production Flaw, January 16, 2009 + Bywonderama (L.A.) - See all my reviews +This camera worked well after six months, but in the past week, after the camera opened, it stayed open and beeped, saying "Lens error, restart camera." Google this term and the Canon 1100IS and you'll see many people with the same problem. Owners who tell Canon about this problem are told to send the camera in for servicing and for their troubles are told that it's their fault instead of a production flaw. A shame since I've bought numerous Canon cameras over the years and have found them to work flawlessly. There's even a class-action suit over this to get them to acknowledge the problem with the 1100IS. Google that and you'll find info on that too. The only justice in this is that a company's reputation takes decades to build, but only a few problems to destroy. They're frittering away their reputation, at least in the mind of this camera owner. diff --git a/SINAI-SA-corpus/1/ref1095_rate1.txt b/SINAI-SA-corpus/1/ref1095_rate1.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..b8d3ccac2a7f902f71221dc999b760748ee30de1 --- /dev/null +++ b/SINAI-SA-corpus/1/ref1095_rate1.txt @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ + Pleased with product, October 21, 2008 + ByMichael H. Rippe "M. Rippe" (Coon Rapids, MN) - See all my reviews +I bought this camera because it was recommended by Consumer Reports. My last digital camera was a problem plagued Fuji with chronic reliability issues--so I have been a skeptical digital camera user. This Canon is a feature rich camera. Nice zoom, takes quick shots, good battery durability, easy to use and friendly user software. I am confident in its long term reliability and consider it a good value. diff --git a/SINAI-SA-corpus/1/ref1160_rate1.txt b/SINAI-SA-corpus/1/ref1160_rate1.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..f8d6110d5c97a859632c7f2f7f53922906617a7a --- /dev/null +++ b/SINAI-SA-corpus/1/ref1160_rate1.txt @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ + Buyer Beware - Starts out nice but then dies at end, April 2, 2008 + ByW. Hubbell (St. Petersburg, FL United States) - See all my reviews +Bought it was pleased with it - had it awhile and now it kills fresh batteries after only a handful of pictures. A friend had one and said she took it to best buy and the guy told her the camera had "died" and new batteries are not the fix - there was no fix - same thing happened to mine. Please consider this possibility if you are buying this camera - would guess mine is a 2-3 yrs old and its dead. Suggest you buy a better name brand. I'm not buying Kodak next time. diff --git a/SINAI-SA-corpus/1/ref1178_rate1.txt b/SINAI-SA-corpus/1/ref1178_rate1.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..1095287b37077bf743aed03af1cda1f3fd24e3e3 --- /dev/null +++ b/SINAI-SA-corpus/1/ref1178_rate1.txt @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ + Broke after 15 days and only used twice, August 13, 2005 + ByRoberto A. Ducreux "Roberto" (Panama City, Panama) - See all my reviews +Good out of the bad. After so much reading I got my CX7430. The second time I went to use it, it turned on and never work again. The lense extended and did nothing else after that. The good part of the story is that I took it back to the Kodak dealer here in Panama City, Panama and within two days a I got not just a replacement but the step up model DX7440 for no extra money. Not much to say about the CX7430, but a big round of applause for the dealership here in Panama diff --git a/SINAI-SA-corpus/1/ref1179_rate1.txt b/SINAI-SA-corpus/1/ref1179_rate1.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..c768b347343f9d568d1ebae4b8e44b8ef7840b5a --- /dev/null +++ b/SINAI-SA-corpus/1/ref1179_rate1.txt @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ + very bad coustomer servise on junk, December 8, 2008 + ByHarold Behnke (michigan USA) - See all my reviews +I have never been a big fan of company's that have moved there coustomer servise overseas . I paid high dollar for this item with the dock and printer .after a short period of time I started having problems with the camera , of course it was out of warrenty . I will never purchase Kodak again . Poor picture quality . diff --git a/SINAI-SA-corpus/1/ref1184_rate1.txt b/SINAI-SA-corpus/1/ref1184_rate1.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..5400cf75f39ac3a2a91a89776893f089f5220760 --- /dev/null +++ b/SINAI-SA-corpus/1/ref1184_rate1.txt @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ + I WAS A SUCKA!!!!, October 30, 2008 + ByDarlene Miller (south carolina) - See all my reviews +THIS PRODUCT SUCKED. I TAKE A PICTURE AND THEY ALL COME OUT DARK. THE OWNER SHOULD HAVE KNOWN THAT. I GUESS I GOT WHAT I PAID FOR. THEY WON'T LIGHTEN UP NO MATTER WHAT I DO TO THEM. I WAS A SUCKA. diff --git a/SINAI-SA-corpus/1/ref1186_rate1.txt b/SINAI-SA-corpus/1/ref1186_rate1.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..e1f9ba690eb2ec0fd6965df998944a533d66cc15 --- /dev/null +++ b/SINAI-SA-corpus/1/ref1186_rate1.txt @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ + Not what your looking for?, June 1, 2006 + Byjohn berry "sam" (Whashinton, GH USA) - See all my reviews +this camera may look pretty but i dont like it one bit. I got this camera last summer before i went on a trip to ohio. At first i thought it was great but now ive totally changed my mind. This camera has bad image quality and is not reliable. It also has an extremely bad zoom and its horribly slow. Its already breaking too. Ive had this camera less than a year and im ready to get a new one. So please- if you are looking to purchase a good quality camera- dont but this one. diff --git a/SINAI-SA-corpus/1/ref1199_rate1.txt b/SINAI-SA-corpus/1/ref1199_rate1.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..4485066762bcb39be07a59407d8bba92b62dbd52 --- /dev/null +++ b/SINAI-SA-corpus/1/ref1199_rate1.txt @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ + Proof that more megapixels does not mean more quality, January 3, 2008 + ByJ. Hoffman (Las Vegas, NV USA) - See all my reviews +The V1003 was purchased for my wife as a diaper bag camera, as my Canon S2 is too bulky to carry around for those cute impromptu baby shots. Unfortunately, this camera did not live up to the quality you would expect from a 10 megapixel camera. The pictures taken indoors with the camera were always very dark, even in well lit rooms. When you got close enough to a subject to offset the darkness factor (i.e., 3 feet away), it would be decently lit, but the picture would appear very blue in hue due to the flash. After doing a little research, I have found that the modern point and shoots with a high number of megapixels do not have large enough lenses to support the number of megapixels. I picked up a Nikon CoolPix 11 camera with 6 megapixels to do a side by side comparison. The difference between the Nikon and the Kodak were like night and day. My recommendation would be to find yourself an older model point and shoot camera with a max of 6 megapixels. diff --git a/SINAI-SA-corpus/1/ref119_rate1.txt b/SINAI-SA-corpus/1/ref119_rate1.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..1e0e6977d8edc79a6dc175c166606882b6084939 --- /dev/null +++ b/SINAI-SA-corpus/1/ref119_rate1.txt @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ + Great Camera with a Major Problem, April 21, 2008 + ByCharles Whitlatch "cwhitla" (Duluth, GA USA) - See all my reviews +I wanted a small camera that took decent photos in available light and had high ISO sensitivity. Image stabilization and a wide range of manual setting were also high on my list. This camera delivers all of that. I was pleased with the quality of the shots even up to ISO 800. ISO 1600 was roughly equivalent to what ISO 400 was on my previous small Canon camera so the A590 IS can cover a lot of range in lighting situations. What caught me almost totally by surprise was the extremely poor battery life. Even without using the flash it seems abysmal. I have taken approximately 60-70 test shots and gone through 2 sets of alkaline and one charge from a pair of NiMH rechargeables. Admittedly this was using the flash about 30% of the time but that's still totally unacceptable. I realize that AA batteries don't have the life of a proprietary lithium ion, but this camera's battery life is so bad it makes it almost unusable to me. Seemed like whenever I turned around it was telling me that the batteries were low and needed replacement. I used a battery tester to check them and found that they still registered pretty good so I'm wondering if the camera's battery level sensitivity is just wrong. Either that or this thing sucks power worse than any camera I have ever owned. Whatever the case, I am truly sorry I purchased this otherwise fine camera. I would much rather have decent battery life than the dubious "convenience" of replacing AA cells all the time. Update: With freshly charged 2500 mAh Ni-MH cells I am seeing an improvement in battery life, at least initially. So far I've taken 36 pictures and no low battery message yet. My previous usage was more intermittent so we'll see if these higher capacity rechargeable bring the camera up to what I consider reasonable battery life. My experience with alkalines is still totally unacceptable in my opinion. diff --git a/SINAI-SA-corpus/1/ref1202_rate1.txt b/SINAI-SA-corpus/1/ref1202_rate1.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..123ed254ee2e33ff9c69b17382b7be5bdb8b50c1 --- /dev/null +++ b/SINAI-SA-corpus/1/ref1202_rate1.txt @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ + It stinks dont buy it, January 23, 2008 + ByMB - See all my reviews +We bought this camera for my daughter for Christmas 2007. She used it once, then it sat on a table until she went to use it again, and the LCD screen was broken. It had been a little more than 30 days so I could not return it to Amazon. I sent it away to Kodak to be fixed/replaced and they want to charge me more than half what I paid for the camera to fix a brand new camera. The camera stinks and Kodaks customer service, or lack there of stinks too. I will NEVER buy a Kodak product again. They do not stand behind their product. I would not give this camera any stars but the system made me. We never even got to see one picture from this camera. diff --git a/SINAI-SA-corpus/1/ref1204_rate1.txt b/SINAI-SA-corpus/1/ref1204_rate1.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..fc8c114d71b52c7276bf1d193ae4a79f74805573 --- /dev/null +++ b/SINAI-SA-corpus/1/ref1204_rate1.txt @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ + A Waste of Time, Sometimes, November 4, 2007 + ByDigital Photographer "Used to Like Nikon,s" (Brooklyn, NY) - See all my reviews +This is really a very nice camera, but with some glaring deficiencies, first the manual is next to useless, tells you just about nothing, it is disjointed, disorderly and at best vague. I think Kodak would have been much more honest to include a flyer inside which said, " you figure it out. The viewfinder in low light is just fine, but, go out in a sunny day with the sun behind you and you cant see a thing, I wish the camera manufacturers would do something about this, 3 cheers for canon, they put an optical viewfinder on their point and shoots. Very sad part, this thing takes some first class photos, sad part,I will return mine. diff --git a/SINAI-SA-corpus/1/ref1207_rate1.txt b/SINAI-SA-corpus/1/ref1207_rate1.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..9cea46d830b8560090ef7c543d4cd0c19c28df77 --- /dev/null +++ b/SINAI-SA-corpus/1/ref1207_rate1.txt @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ + Highly Disappointing, January 5, 2008 + ByE. Santos (Downey, CA USA) - See all my reviews +I bought this camera for only $140 and that price was one of the defining factors for my purchase. I had read all the reviews and yet I thought that this camera couldn't be as bad as some people thought. Sadly it is. I used to own the kodak V603, which was only 6 MP, but it still performed better than this camera. That camera was ruined after I went kayaking and I and my camera went into the water. I also used to own the C340 but my brother broke that. It was only 5 MP and did better than this camera. Next time I'll buy the V1253 as a replacement. Negatives: -The picture quality is low compared to the V603 except in bright light where it is about the same. Pictures come out blurry indoors and often grainy. -In the sun, you can't see the screen at all. -You can hear the camera zoom in and out when taking video, and even when it's quiet you hear too much noise. -IT FREEZES A LOT. That pissed me off the most. I thought it was just my camera but my mom's friend has the same problem with the same camera. -The button to turn off flash is in the upper lefthand corner, which is inconvenient for people like me who prefer it next to the On/Off button to immediately turn flash off. -After using it awhile, it says "Unrecognized file format" when I go into review to view pictures it recognized only a minute ago. To fix that i just turn it off and leave it alone for awhile, but it does get annoying. -Takes a long time to focus. -Takes awhile to turn on. -The camera itself is pretty thick. -Anti-blur mode makes pictures grainy instead of blurry. Positive: -It looks nice. -Good pictures outdoors. -The joystick is fun. -Perfect touch technology right on the camera. -Over 20 modes to choose from to fit your setting, including panorama. Overall, this camera sucks. Even though i haven't tried the V1253, I'd recommend trying that over this camera. At least the V1253 has face recognition, HD video, and a large screen that may actually show excellent quality pictures the V1003 can't deliver. diff --git a/SINAI-SA-corpus/1/ref1217_rate1.txt b/SINAI-SA-corpus/1/ref1217_rate1.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..0a4a21af8f6dd6e140fae71d6c5f5e222b6cdccb --- /dev/null +++ b/SINAI-SA-corpus/1/ref1217_rate1.txt @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ + Fragile LCD... Watch out.., March 3, 2008 + ByG. Chang (GA, USA) - See all my reviews +Nice one but .... After 3 month light use, this camera has a crack on the LCD. I don't remember to drop it or hit it with something, but always within my pocket if I carry it. It is useless now. Still function but can't see the picture. Search internet for the LCD replacement and found some complain about how fragile this LCD was. Always a little bit late to catch the quality...There is a poor guy broke his second V1003 LCD. Not me for sure. Maybe a design issue..I will pay attention on the quality next time. You need to buy a protection case and good luck... diff --git a/SINAI-SA-corpus/1/ref1228_rate1.txt b/SINAI-SA-corpus/1/ref1228_rate1.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..4544f21870c204dd650ce41a57e56cc2b0234b1c --- /dev/null +++ b/SINAI-SA-corpus/1/ref1228_rate1.txt @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ + LCD IS TOO DELICATE / IS NOT PROTECTED, August 22, 2007 + ByGift Card Recipient "Digital Camera LOVER" (San Jose, California USA) - See all my reviews +This camera has good quality pics/ 10 MB. It is kind of slow. I bought one about 25 days ago. THERE IS ONE BIG FLAW. The LCD screen is not protected. Many digital cameras do have a protective HARD COVER for the LCD screen. This camera is TOO DELICATE. I have bought more than 5 digital cameras for the last 5 years. This is the FIRST ONE that I broke the LCD screen. diff --git a/SINAI-SA-corpus/1/ref1237_rate1.txt b/SINAI-SA-corpus/1/ref1237_rate1.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..bc257b44bfea7415d7faa6041a83832ae59b5419 --- /dev/null +++ b/SINAI-SA-corpus/1/ref1237_rate1.txt @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ + Broken Lens, September 17, 2008 + ByKatelyn Dearing - See all my reviews +I received this camera as a gift and had to send it in three times to be fixed. (Yes, I am EXTREMELY careful with my cameras) First, the lens would not go back inside. Second, because it would not charge. Third, for the lens again. I used it once after it got sent back and it broke again. A waste of time. diff --git a/SINAI-SA-corpus/1/ref1251_rate1.txt b/SINAI-SA-corpus/1/ref1251_rate1.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..f7058bf14628d00ad0c3f77c6d2238336063c934 --- /dev/null +++ b/SINAI-SA-corpus/1/ref1251_rate1.txt @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ + Wish I Had Returned It, May 27, 2008 + ByJulia A. Mcferrin - See all my reviews +Kodak EasyShare V1003 10MP Digital Camera with 3x Optical Zoom (Midnight Black) You cannot use the anti-blur mode with any of the other modes. It seems very sensitive to movement. If you use the anti-blur mode and want to take a close up (or any other 20+ modes, e.g. landscape, sport), you are out of luck for anti-blur. I find this really annoying. I'm certainly not going to carry around a tripod for everyday, ordinary pictures. diff --git a/SINAI-SA-corpus/1/ref1256_rate1.txt b/SINAI-SA-corpus/1/ref1256_rate1.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..85d6ad7d4e079923968c3bfd0a0e2588fcadd46e --- /dev/null +++ b/SINAI-SA-corpus/1/ref1256_rate1.txt @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ + Unreliable, April 28, 2008 + ByA. Hawkins "Real Muzic lover" (Washington,DC) - See all my reviews +Camera battery failed after 3 shots. Could just be the battery but the action shots were out of focus also. diff --git a/SINAI-SA-corpus/1/ref1265_rate1.txt b/SINAI-SA-corpus/1/ref1265_rate1.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..6b8e33656c797966c094edfd67bc023a1436b100 --- /dev/null +++ b/SINAI-SA-corpus/1/ref1265_rate1.txt @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ + Defective out of the box - $80 bill, March 30, 2008 + ByM. Cunningham - See all my reviews +I purchased a Kodak V1003 camera prior to taking a short vacation. The camera was defective out of the box (frozen lens cover). Finally able to push the cover open (an unauthorized action), I managed to capture at least a few pictures and informed Kodak. The official response - Kodak repairs but does not replace defective cameras (brand new units included). Unauthorized damage/repairs void the warranty resulting in an $80 repair fee. Buyer beware! diff --git a/SINAI-SA-corpus/1/ref1268_rate1.txt b/SINAI-SA-corpus/1/ref1268_rate1.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..3201ee4c047465e3f18d09d2e12c0a7d5744c5b2 --- /dev/null +++ b/SINAI-SA-corpus/1/ref1268_rate1.txt @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ + Not Happy with the V1003, March 26, 2008 + ByLaura Leenderts (Hills, MN) - See all my reviews +I have had my Kodak V1003 for about 5 months and I am not happy with this product. I bought this camera because I loved my Kodak DX7630 but it didn't withstand a rainstorm (oops!). I thought I would update the features and size and ended up with the V1003. The camera is TOO SLOW. I have a small child who is usually half way across the room before the picture shoots. I have a lot of trouble with blurry photos and/or varying brightness and Kodak customer support has been unable to help me. They suggest using a tripod but does that really make sense for a point and shoot camera?!? I can take 10 pictures of the same item and get a variety of quality - some blurry, some too dark, some too light, and once in a while a perfect picture. The most attractive features of this camera are the physical size and MP. But 10 MP does you no good if the photo is blurry. When the camera is working well, it has awesome color and clarity - it just takes a lot of picture taking to get that one great photo. diff --git a/SINAI-SA-corpus/1/ref1276_rate1.txt b/SINAI-SA-corpus/1/ref1276_rate1.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..1e357282f459c8fbaa3b0f977df1ca35e7080549 --- /dev/null +++ b/SINAI-SA-corpus/1/ref1276_rate1.txt @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ + movie download porblems, July 7, 2008 + A Kid's Review + lets u film movies in HD mode one problem is the movie uses 700GB thats bigger then a dvd for less then 20 minutes worth lenth . I wanted to save theese to cd - r rom but the movie I made with the camera where too big just the same size as a hollywood dvd . the other problem was Downloading the movie to my pc after dueing so the movie kept freezing up on my pc when playing. Can any body tell me why it skips on my pc. I was filming on boat in fast motion but it downloaded with slipping problems. when playing it on the camera it dident have that problem. its possible it downloaded with problems.. all it takes it one crew up and u wont be happy with this camera. Any body else having this problem ?? reply to my question & I will read it latter, thanks diff --git a/SINAI-SA-corpus/1/ref1278_rate1.txt b/SINAI-SA-corpus/1/ref1278_rate1.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..52934182b519770135335d38bdbc46a83a409f7d --- /dev/null +++ b/SINAI-SA-corpus/1/ref1278_rate1.txt @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ + LCD Screen Cracked!, May 5, 2008 + ByN. Thomas "yogasister" (sf bay area) - See all my reviews +I had the same problem with the LCD screen. I had the camera just 3 months or so and it cracked. I had it in a pocket in my purse, so it was not without some protection. After reading about all the hassles with Kodak customer service, I really don't want to go thru the trouble of mailing it off, etc..... I had an EasyShare a few years ago that worked just lovely, so that is why I bought this one. But no more Kodak products for me. diff --git a/SINAI-SA-corpus/1/ref1279_rate1.txt b/SINAI-SA-corpus/1/ref1279_rate1.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..7387ef59a4763c2ddfe1c0b6221c10000d07ed02 --- /dev/null +++ b/SINAI-SA-corpus/1/ref1279_rate1.txt @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ + Worst camera ever!, March 26, 2008 + ByJAO (Maryland) - See all my reviews +This camera takes horrible pictures. They are grainy and blurry and in no way look like what a 10 MP picture should look like. It also takes way too long to even focus & take a picture. I owned a DX7630 which was a 6.0MP and it took far better quality pictures. Do not waste the money on this camera. It is junk! diff --git a/SINAI-SA-corpus/1/ref1317_rate1.txt b/SINAI-SA-corpus/1/ref1317_rate1.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..14c449b3ab84e722b087222015e3a01ce716406a --- /dev/null +++ b/SINAI-SA-corpus/1/ref1317_rate1.txt @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ + 0 Stars. Broke after 2 months, February 19, 2007 + ByC. Fitch "carebear73usa" (Texas) - See all my reviews +I had this camera for 2 months. It was kept in a case and was very well taken care of. I would not even allow my husband to touch it. I was taking pictures and then one suddenly came out as a white screen. I took another and the same thing. I asked my husband what he thought was wrong. We took out our memory card and tried internal. Same thing again. He said maybe it was the LCD screen. We loaded the pictures in the computer and it was even worse. I contacted Kodak several times. They don't care about their customers. I have talked to several others in similar situations with similar results. We will try to get their attention with a lawsuit. If interested contact me [...] diff --git a/SINAI-SA-corpus/1/ref1322_rate1.txt b/SINAI-SA-corpus/1/ref1322_rate1.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..d644597b5fe43f9b731f1f41c28a3184bdd80330 --- /dev/null +++ b/SINAI-SA-corpus/1/ref1322_rate1.txt @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ + BIG MISTAKE!, October 20, 2008 + ByCindy Lopez "Lepa Shandy" (Houston) - See all my reviews +Buying this camera was a big mistake as it went bad within one month of extremely gentle and almost non-existent use! diff --git a/SINAI-SA-corpus/1/ref1323_rate1.txt b/SINAI-SA-corpus/1/ref1323_rate1.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..f64e7c01d0847775df0b9dd812c8173043c7d432 --- /dev/null +++ b/SINAI-SA-corpus/1/ref1323_rate1.txt @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ + great camera, until it dies, April 3, 2008 + ByS. J. Cunningham "tumblingon" (New Zealand) - See all my reviews +I've had the Kodak Easyshare for about two years now, and loved it--great pictures, easy to hold, etc. If I had reviewed this camera until any time in the last month, I would have given it a 5 star rating. Then one day it simply wouldn't turn on. I changed the batteries twice, and it wouldn't turn on. A quick Google search uncovered four forums with other Easyshare users describing the same problem. And the problem apparently can't be fixed, or at least can't be fixed for less than the price of a new camera, according to the local Kodak shop. I know that cameras don't last forever, but two years of taking maybe 100 photos per year? This is ridiculous! diff --git a/SINAI-SA-corpus/1/ref1359_rate1.txt b/SINAI-SA-corpus/1/ref1359_rate1.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..3f95dbda30489087f48839fcaabaece76acec3e5 --- /dev/null +++ b/SINAI-SA-corpus/1/ref1359_rate1.txt @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ + Windows XP problem, April 19, 2006 + ByA Customer "acustomer2" (Malibu, CA United States) - See all my reviews +I have a different model Kodak camera, however they all use the same EasyShare software. Running Windows XP, I could not get the software to work properly. After several hours on the phone with Kodak tech support, they couldn't get it working either. They said they are aware of the problem on some computers running Windows XP. It is now several weeks later and they still don't have a fix. They don't really seem to care either. It might not be a bad idea to consider other brands, instead of Kodak. Since, if the software won't work properly, then what good is the camera? diff --git a/SINAI-SA-corpus/1/ref1406_rate1.txt b/SINAI-SA-corpus/1/ref1406_rate1.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..1887a03cd195a307bffd975dfc3b90bc21cd565f --- /dev/null +++ b/SINAI-SA-corpus/1/ref1406_rate1.txt @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ + Only lasted 14 months, September 27, 2006 + Byshutterbug - See all my reviews +This was my first digital camera. It took great pictures. I ABSOLUTELY LOVED IT!!! My mother and a friend each bought the same camera from my recommendation. But, after using it for only 14 months, it stopped working. It wasn't dropped, or bumped or damaged in any way. When I try to take pictures, the screen is totally black and takes black full frame pictures. I know this because the "view pictures" mode still works. I called Kodak and of course the warranty period ended after 12 months. They charge a flat fee of $125.00 for a repair and then only give a 30 day warranty. Really disappointed but have actually considered buying another simply because of the awesome pictures that I was able to take. My only advice...buy an extended warranty!! diff --git a/SINAI-SA-corpus/1/ref1450_rate1.txt b/SINAI-SA-corpus/1/ref1450_rate1.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..96af140286cc709c776c1f3854edd64b9126338d --- /dev/null +++ b/SINAI-SA-corpus/1/ref1450_rate1.txt @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ + Bad Flash and Customer Service, March 23, 2005 + ByG. Wesley Aven (Atlanta, Ga. USA) - See all my reviews +I have been a Canon fan for years but a friend recommended the 5700. After only a few hundred pictures the flash stopped working and my friend said that he now has the same problem. I contacted Niknon and they said the problem was not covered under warrenty and I payed $170.00 for the repair. Hope it works for a while. I have now purchased a Canon 10D SLR and love the Canon. Do not buy the 5700!! Wes Aven gwaven@mindspring.com diff --git a/SINAI-SA-corpus/1/ref1465_rate1.txt b/SINAI-SA-corpus/1/ref1465_rate1.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..20999807d0f65cea1ab839e824d82caa002c85f0 --- /dev/null +++ b/SINAI-SA-corpus/1/ref1465_rate1.txt @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ + what a piece of JUNQUE, March 13, 2005 + Byradio100 "radio100" (Blaine MN) - See all my reviews +I saved my nickels to buy a Nikon. What a mistake.. I did not believe the other reviews that detailed the poor focus performance of the Coolpix Nikon camara line what a mistake. Once I had purchased the camara I tried to contact Nikon for support what a mistake... Save your money buy ANYTHING but a Nikon. It is a terrific dissapointment both for the camara and the support... If you have questions about its performance ask your cat, you will get better results.... I wonder, after 2 months how much I will get for it on eBay... No chance of Nikon support reading these reviews they have proved themselves unconcerned with customer focused quality.. Show them your concern by not buying Nikon.... The SONY digital camara actually focuses on things.. JUNK, JUNK, JUNK, JUNK, JUNK, JUNK... expensive JUNK... diff --git a/SINAI-SA-corpus/1/ref1467_rate1.txt b/SINAI-SA-corpus/1/ref1467_rate1.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..89d8c4204de65745e09439cfd2153cb43096d567 --- /dev/null +++ b/SINAI-SA-corpus/1/ref1467_rate1.txt @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ + Most unreliable piece of equipment ever purchased, January 13, 2008 + BySteve (Texas) - See all my reviews +I too fell into the "if it is Nikon" trap. Afer reading many reviews on the camera, I purchased two as my first step into digital photography. One for my wife and one for myself. We probalby have less than 1000 pictures on both combined. My wife's has been sent in for repairs twice for the zoom lens not working. I got mine out this morning to take a picture and the view finder and screen are both blank. I'm not even going to wast 10 bucks to ship it back again for repair. I still have several months left on the extended warrenty but it just not worth the effort. And... everything about taking extremely long time to focus is true. This is the deciding reason for not having it fixed. Even when it is working, it is a very aggrevating camera. The number of good shots you miss while it tries to focus is unbelievable. Both of my Coolpix 5700 were pieces of junk. It was a very expensive lesson about Nikon quality. With two cameras, additional lenses, battery packs, 1G memory disks, and extended warrenties, about 3K total. Since I've only owned two Nikons, I can truthfully say when the topic comes up, "Every Nikon I owned was a piece of junk. I'll never buy another one.". diff --git a/SINAI-SA-corpus/1/ref1469_rate1.txt b/SINAI-SA-corpus/1/ref1469_rate1.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..7ac126954e5a74f3a07afd6b033cde3fda38d0fc --- /dev/null +++ b/SINAI-SA-corpus/1/ref1469_rate1.txt @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ + Don't waste your money on this one., December 5, 2004 + Byjosephine (San Jose, CA USA) - See all my reviews +Please don't buy this camera. This camera has the WORST auto focus you can imagine. I have used Canon EOS for over a decade. Maybe that is why I believe this camera is sub-standard. For indoor pictures, it takes a few seconds after you press the shutter to take the picture. Try to get a good picture of a young child with a camera like that! Even my 3MP Kodak takes better photos indoors than this one. diff --git a/SINAI-SA-corpus/1/ref1470_rate1.txt b/SINAI-SA-corpus/1/ref1470_rate1.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..f865ef7aa7c5ab90c73adb1f2d87aacb82734a57 --- /dev/null +++ b/SINAI-SA-corpus/1/ref1470_rate1.txt @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ + dead pixels, October 21, 2002 + ByMehrdad Givehchi (Boston, MA USA) - See all my reviews +I bought this camera brand new and after a week I realized that when I take pictures, in some spots there are dead pixels that are very obvious to the naked eye. Gradually over time, more pixels are getting defective. diff --git a/SINAI-SA-corpus/1/ref1473_rate1.txt b/SINAI-SA-corpus/1/ref1473_rate1.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..a7e6a72df67448fe92ffd59dee69c5f83654705e --- /dev/null +++ b/SINAI-SA-corpus/1/ref1473_rate1.txt @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ + Built in flash doesn't work!!!, February 22, 2003 + By A Customer +I request a change of the first camera because the built in flash did not work,the same thing happened with the replacement, Nikon service suport center answered me saying that I have to send the camera for repairment!! I am returning back because that camera has a big problem with the built in flash!!! I recommend not to buy this camera, DIGITAL COOLPIX 5700 FROM NIKON. diff --git a/SINAI-SA-corpus/1/ref1476_rate1.txt b/SINAI-SA-corpus/1/ref1476_rate1.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..b5acf04e80d084102e3ea6276879ad499219228c --- /dev/null +++ b/SINAI-SA-corpus/1/ref1476_rate1.txt @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ + Lemon Camera, December 9, 2002 + By"simplemindstec" (OLD BRIDGE, NJ USA) - See all my reviews +Do not buy this camera. After using it for 3 months I got "lens Error". It can't even focus on low light condition. When you pressed the shutter , it will take at least 3 to 4 sec to take the shot. I called Nikon for service , and they replaced it with a new one. Adviced is do not buy this Nikon 5700 . Lemon ... Lemon ... Lemon ...How about Olympus...? diff --git a/SINAI-SA-corpus/1/ref1477_rate1.txt b/SINAI-SA-corpus/1/ref1477_rate1.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..4fe8e00857b5eb95999a963693398cfe529ce115 --- /dev/null +++ b/SINAI-SA-corpus/1/ref1477_rate1.txt @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ + Cool to Nikon Coolpix 5MP, July 10, 2003 + ByOdie Asscherick (Houston, Texas United States) - See all my reviews +Well the 32 power is great for distance shots, but the lack of a color viewfinder and the lack of cd-rom storage limits the user to constantly replacing the flash cards.In the field, having to view the 2 inch plus screen to get perfect shots is quite tricky.I use the SONY MVCCD1000 which has a color viewfinder and a cd-rom storage capacity as well as a camcorder battery allowing 130 minutes of power.1056 pics at 640x480 can be achieved. Match that with a flash card and you will be dragging it on a wagon. diff --git a/SINAI-SA-corpus/1/ref1478_rate1.txt b/SINAI-SA-corpus/1/ref1478_rate1.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..a065c318aa95a7ea33505772807c3a53417c7b10 --- /dev/null +++ b/SINAI-SA-corpus/1/ref1478_rate1.txt @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ + What a Joke?, January 31, 2003 + By A Customer +Although it is a great camera, I rate it with only ONE star because of the way it is sold! If it is a joke, it is certainly a very bad one! I do not wish to give ant information about myself to find out about the price! Instaed of wasting my tame to play this stupid game, I prefer to right here on what I think about this silly method! I was and am interested in purchasing this camera, but before making any decision, I have to know the price, which I still do NOT know! If you wish to play this stupid game, them there must be something fishy, and then, so long! diff --git a/SINAI-SA-corpus/1/ref1510_rate1.txt b/SINAI-SA-corpus/1/ref1510_rate1.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..ede209d1e0f8aa55d05fec3435c349c8a9ca9e5c --- /dev/null +++ b/SINAI-SA-corpus/1/ref1510_rate1.txt @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ + Decent camera, but not built to last, November 1, 2005 + ByBug Artist (Santa Monica, CA USA) - See all my reviews +My Coolpix 5700 now gets a "lens error" whenever it is switched on, and it won't operate at all, nor even switch off again until you remove the batteries. A quick google search reveals that this is a chronic problem with this and other Nikon models (the lens gearing in Nikon cameras is evidently quite fragile), so I don't know if it is worth trying to have it repaired. Additionally, the flash on this camera has never functioned (it never would pop up), although the camera always thinks that it needs the flash even in the brightest daylight, so it never takes any pictures at all (instead showing a cryptic "SB" error message when you press the shutter) unless the flash is first manually turned off. As a workaround, I have always kept it in one of the "user preset" modes in which the flash was disabled. I don't like to use the build-in flash anyway, so this was not a big deal for me, but the "lens error" is evidently fatal. I now see many other user comments online about these same problems, and about Nikon's unresponsiveness on the issues. Some of these cameras have died after just a few weeks, so I guess I beat the odds by getting two years of moderately heavy use out of mine. As my CoolPix 990 also died after just two years, I don't think I will ever buy another Nikon. diff --git a/SINAI-SA-corpus/1/ref1520_rate1.txt b/SINAI-SA-corpus/1/ref1520_rate1.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..7f9b9d692ee85db111844860082bf85c8ab09ed8 --- /dev/null +++ b/SINAI-SA-corpus/1/ref1520_rate1.txt @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ + bad camera from a company like nikon, April 8, 2006 + Byavoodi "avoodi" (nj) - See all my reviews +Used the camera for abt 2 years, without any problem, was very happy.. and suddenly there was no picture/image shown in the lcd or the view finder.. like the lense cap is on or something,, while the camera is on.. it just shows the menu settings. but does not show any image. someone told me , i might have tried to take the battery out while keeping the camera in "ON" position.. this might damage the circuit.. I cant believe it, i mean so many people can do that either un-knowingly or just by mistake or in a hurry/rush .. if this is a real cause of the problem i am having , then this is utterly riduculous.. and i cant expect this from a company like nikon.. i waited for almost 2 years to buy a good camera, and when i finally had money i bought this one .. diff --git a/SINAI-SA-corpus/1/ref1523_rate1.txt b/SINAI-SA-corpus/1/ref1523_rate1.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..1f7e00645ec58ad9461de0d9c8fd28b8434ba2e8 --- /dev/null +++ b/SINAI-SA-corpus/1/ref1523_rate1.txt @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ + Rendered useless by chronic failures, September 29, 2005 + ByF. Cochran (Springfield, VA USA) - See all my reviews +I've had a number of cameras in the CoolPix line, and been mostly delighted with them. Unfortunately, my experience with the 5700 has been a debacle. As for many who purchased this camera, the flash on mine stopped functioning a few months after I bought it for more than $1,000 when this model was relatively new. This rendered the camera useless, disabling all but one shooting mode. And since the feedback was just a cryptic blinking red light and a code "SB" (defined nowhere in the manual or online), it took forever to determine I hadn't simply activated the wrong setting--this was a defect that required repair. I sent it in under warranty in the nick of time and got it back about a month later. It worked for maybe two more months and failed again. Same story. Now it's out of warranty with the same problem, and it looks as if I'd get no more on e-Bay than it would cost me to repair this lemon. (Not that I could sell it, even repaired, with a clear conscience.) TERRIBLY frustrating and costly experience with the camera I bought to record my young son's childhood--now he's in kindergarten, I've had to rely on pictures from others, and those years are never coming back. Avoid the 5700. Please Nikon, don't do this to us again! diff --git a/SINAI-SA-corpus/1/ref1530_rate1.txt b/SINAI-SA-corpus/1/ref1530_rate1.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..ce40f1a059e6b81736aab402cf3fcdeb2ff82ae6 --- /dev/null +++ b/SINAI-SA-corpus/1/ref1530_rate1.txt @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ + Developed Problems in the CCD, February 19, 2003 + ByPrabhakar Govindaraj (Sunnyvale, CA United States) - See all my reviews +I used this camera for 3months (about 500 shots) and was shocked to see a damaged pixel in the CCD. A red color dot appeared in the shots and the camera became useless. I have sent it to Nikon (through RitzCamera) for repair and it is more then 5 weeks now. No updates on the repair work could be obtained from Nikon/Ritzcamera - very poor customer service given the fact that I have already spent more then $ on this product.I really feel sorry to have spent so much on 5700.Latest: May 14, 2003: I got my CP5700 replaced with a brand new piece. It took me 5 months and 3 shipments (to NikonInc NY), to make this happen. diff --git a/SINAI-SA-corpus/1/ref1546_rate1.txt b/SINAI-SA-corpus/1/ref1546_rate1.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..c95c95f510f2cfb26d7ff2c30479c8eb3362c65c --- /dev/null +++ b/SINAI-SA-corpus/1/ref1546_rate1.txt @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ + Coolpix 5700 - paperweight, October 20, 2004 + ByAlan Smithx - See all my reviews +This camera stopped working after 2 months. (no image in viewfinder or display) Sent into Nikon Service, returned 3 weeks later with $0 invoice for Coolpix 4300 repair, stamped "Beyond Repair". I had to contact technical support and have them track down why no repair was made. They told me that there was "moisture damage" and therefore not covered under warrenty. Believe me when I tell you, this camera never got wet or even used in rainy weather. I now have a $650 paperweight and would never buy anything made by Nikon. BEWARE! diff --git a/SINAI-SA-corpus/1/ref1552_rate1.txt b/SINAI-SA-corpus/1/ref1552_rate1.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..eefa4473dc8dd4c25cf3357e01eed50fa7ed1d4d --- /dev/null +++ b/SINAI-SA-corpus/1/ref1552_rate1.txt @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ + Lens Error, April 19, 2006 + ByJames D. Harper "David" - See all my reviews +Have had this camera for one year, now when I try to power it on I get 'LENS ERROR' and the lens does not move. Apparently this is a very widespread and known problem that Nikon continues to charge $300 a pop to fix. diff --git a/SINAI-SA-corpus/1/ref1568_rate1.txt b/SINAI-SA-corpus/1/ref1568_rate1.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..fa8a30abd18c5053b75392bf59f9e1fe3d642209 --- /dev/null +++ b/SINAI-SA-corpus/1/ref1568_rate1.txt @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ + Buyer beware, May 27, 2008 + ByMatthew W. Norman (Atlanta, GA) - See all my reviews +Bought this product about one week before a ten day vacation in the British Virgin Islands. Tested the camera beforehand. Have shot exclusively in Digital SLR for last four years. Wanted a waterproof camera for snorkeling and the beach. The 10 megapixels was a plus. Minimal shutter-lag was also a plus. Here was the big downside . . . the LCD quit working after four days. We took the camera in the water each day. Never exceeded the fine print of only one hour in the water at a time. Nor did we exceed the depth recommendations. However, the lcd quit after taking it to a pool for about one hour on the 3rd day of the trip. Tried to contact tech support at Olympus, which promptly sent an automated reply that I would hear within 48 hours. Over one week later, I received a disappointing email that stated I could send the camera back and may be responsible for the expense. The camera shot great pictures . . . when it worked. A brand new camera as well as a new product for Olympus should not be so unreliable. Perhaps your purchase will not react the same way . . . but buyer beware. Buy at your own risk! diff --git a/SINAI-SA-corpus/1/ref1625_rate1.txt b/SINAI-SA-corpus/1/ref1625_rate1.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..71521d7607603093e2b107815d27337b43d6b290 --- /dev/null +++ b/SINAI-SA-corpus/1/ref1625_rate1.txt @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ + so disappointing , July 27, 2008 + ByO. Carballo (South Florida) - See all my reviews + I used my new Olympus 1030 SW on a trip to Grand Cayman, after the first use in water it kept reading a message that there was a compartment open, which I could not see. The next day I was able to use it and I took hundreds of pics. Some were awesome and others grainy, but then again it stopped working saying there was a compartment open. I returned it; got a new one. Took some really great pics out of water, then the first time in the water after taking a few pics it just turned off and turning it on did not do a thing. I am returning it luckily within 30 days. But I am extremely disappointed in this product. diff --git a/SINAI-SA-corpus/1/ref1628_rate1.txt b/SINAI-SA-corpus/1/ref1628_rate1.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..7f53b594febf88bd24214124a5d4fe82f2a938ba --- /dev/null +++ b/SINAI-SA-corpus/1/ref1628_rate1.txt @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ + Be Careful: Does not work with card readers, and poor tech support, April 9, 2008 + ByJet Setter (Massachusetts) - See all my reviews +This camera is OK. The wide zoom and durability features are great for the way my department it - to take pictures of construction sites. There is one big problem, though: Olympus built software into this camera that prevents the xD card from being read in anything other than an Olympus card reader. When I called Olympus tech support for a solution, their response was rude and aggravating. The tech basically told me they did this because they sell a card reader, and if I wanted to use a card reader, I had to buy theirs. Or, I could plug the camera into the PC. I sent the letter below to Olympus tech support email. It will be interesting to see if/how they respond. MY LETTER TO OLYMPUS TECH SUPPORT AFTER A BAD TELEPHONE SUPPORT EXPERIENCE: I just bought a new Stylus 1030SW for my department. I thought it was a great little camera, until I needed some tech support. Here's the problem: This is a department camera. The goal was to make it available to all of my product managers, and let each of them have their own storage cards. We need the ability to read the storage cards through a card reader, because plugging the camera into the PC is not practical. I've never had a problem with this in the past, and I own an Olympus C7070 Wide Zoom that works fine. Unfortunately, with this new Stylus, when I plug into the card reader, I get an error message that the card needs to be formatted. If I format the card in the reader, when I put it back in the camera, the camera says it needs to format the card. Ugh! I need a solution that does not involve plugging the camera directly into the PC (impractical because the camera might be out on another job) and does not involve buying an additional card reader (impractical because I already have a multi-card reader plugged into my PC, and I use it to read cards from other cameras, and I don't need any more network drive conflicts right now). Please provide an acceptable solution. I would hate to have to return this camera, because I like the size and functionality. I just don't like the inclusion of proprietary software that doesn't add any consumer benefits. diff --git a/SINAI-SA-corpus/1/ref1635_rate1.txt b/SINAI-SA-corpus/1/ref1635_rate1.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..3e931f39bafa97d364e602a7d41dcb55d0472905 --- /dev/null +++ b/SINAI-SA-corpus/1/ref1635_rate1.txt @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ + great until it broke, October 4, 2008 + ByDebbie Bennett "eddie" (cal) - See all my reviews +Well i brought my camera for taking pictures of me surfing. i read the booklet and made surf it would be okay in the conditions. The first day i shoot night shoot of some friends for 45 minutes. the following day i was shooting some friend in small surf when the camera failed and was broken. im very disappointed. 300$ for a camera that breaks in the first 2 days. diff --git a/SINAI-SA-corpus/1/ref1638_rate1.txt b/SINAI-SA-corpus/1/ref1638_rate1.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..9d45916e768fe664948bce46485e1ca044cdd008 --- /dev/null +++ b/SINAI-SA-corpus/1/ref1638_rate1.txt @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ + Worked Only for a Few Days, August 27, 2008 + ByWilliam R. Heckman III "ski time" (Washington DC) - See all my reviews +Appears to be a nice product, but if the LCD goes black then you have no view finder and no access to the functions. The camera only worked for a few days so I would not recommend it. diff --git a/SINAI-SA-corpus/1/ref1640_rate1.txt b/SINAI-SA-corpus/1/ref1640_rate1.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..72b9db05743d70422b8448731407a4405b2c40f0 --- /dev/null +++ b/SINAI-SA-corpus/1/ref1640_rate1.txt @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ + Fuzzy Fotos, August 17, 2008 + ByD. Couch - See all my reviews +This is a terrible camera, of my 500 photos taken over 3/4 of them were out of focus and fuzzy. Photos that were posed and up close were fuzzy - not just action shots. We are returning this camera. diff --git a/SINAI-SA-corpus/1/ref1641_rate1.txt b/SINAI-SA-corpus/1/ref1641_rate1.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..48061f7e5e0bb803c95b8ca4140cd4e98b7b16a0 --- /dev/null +++ b/SINAI-SA-corpus/1/ref1641_rate1.txt @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ + Battery Charging, May 18, 2008 + ByCustomer - See all my reviews +I will have to return this camera unless I am seriously not understanding something. I plugged my fully-charged camera into my laptop via USB and within 20 minutes the battery was completely dead. Then I noticed page 62 on the Instruction Manual where is says: During the conditions described below, power is consumed continuously and the battery becomes exhausted quickly: - The camera is connected to a computer or printer. So, connecting the 1030 via USB doesn't charge the battery as anyone with a cell phone or PDA would expect, it actually kills it! Quickly! Connecting the camera and getting distracted for a few minutes means you have a dead battery and no more shooting for 2-3 hours while recharge it! This has to be the dumbest "feature" I've ever seen on an electronic device. Am I just missing something? diff --git a/SINAI-SA-corpus/1/ref1642_rate1.txt b/SINAI-SA-corpus/1/ref1642_rate1.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..3a5dcfae93a8fd5a8e0e47b0fe8ab6ec3010de38 --- /dev/null +++ b/SINAI-SA-corpus/1/ref1642_rate1.txt @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ + fails in four hours, May 13, 2008 + ByJ. Doyle (Richmond, VA USA) - See all my reviews +We bought an Olympus 1030 for a family trip to the Florida keys which included some snorkling. The camera quit working half way thru the trip with only 3 to 4 hours in water. We were very dissapointed and missed a lot of good photo opps. It is going back. diff --git a/SINAI-SA-corpus/1/ref1644_rate1.txt b/SINAI-SA-corpus/1/ref1644_rate1.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..2338dddb52a7d08ac35d0632c086095c326b53ba --- /dev/null +++ b/SINAI-SA-corpus/1/ref1644_rate1.txt @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ + Not really waterproof...., July 7, 2008 + ByI. Barcelo (Girona, Spain) - See all my reviews +I am not happy with this product at all. It is supposed to be a waterproof camera and that is why you pay a little more when you buy it. It is supposed to be good at 33ft. under water but the first time I used it inside the swimingpool with the kids it was full of water and stopped working. I don't call this a waterproof camera so don't buy it if that is what you want to use it for. diff --git a/SINAI-SA-corpus/1/ref1645_rate1.txt b/SINAI-SA-corpus/1/ref1645_rate1.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..53c97c541562d5df7d108b225720dc032f8e9fbb --- /dev/null +++ b/SINAI-SA-corpus/1/ref1645_rate1.txt @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ + Worst service by merchant, June 13, 2008 + ByS. Koo "Day One Amazoner" (New York, NY United States) - See all my reviews +I ordered a green camera but the merchant Amazon assigned shipped me a silver one. Reason? They didn't have one. They asked me to return it for credit but by that time I needed a camera. Now I am stuck with a camera I did not want. Just bad people. diff --git a/SINAI-SA-corpus/1/ref1647_rate1.txt b/SINAI-SA-corpus/1/ref1647_rate1.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..4b58f28a3a87ea4efdfde8131a26df5a3267c2b5 --- /dev/null +++ b/SINAI-SA-corpus/1/ref1647_rate1.txt @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ + Not great...., November 30, 2008 + ByRobert Cleland "Go Jackets" (Dallas, TX) - See all my reviews +I got this camera a few months ago to have a rugged camera that I could use at the beach and stick in my pocket. I had a Canon Powershot SD600 before that had been ruined by beach spray. Previous to that I had an Olympus Camedia D-560 Zoom in college which had been abused thoroughly and survived 5 years and mutliple countries. I was disappointed with the Canon as it was so delicate so I decided to switch back to Olympus. To summarize... This camera is well below average. I have tried using it in a variety of settings and all have been subpar. I waited to write a review after a few months, thinking I might be able to work out the kinks - but after a wonderful Thanksgiving - I felt I must mention this camera's inadequacies: 1. The camera takes rather blurry pictures when it should not - it's pot luck - some turn out alright, many do not. There is a setting that is supposed to eliminate this problem, but it does not. 2. I like simple cameras that don't require me to adjust the setting for any moment. This camera doesn't allow that so when a moment strikes -pictures often come out either overexposed, blurry, or grainy. Ridiculous for a camera of this price. 2. The movies are absolutely terrible - seriously, I could probably draw a flipbook better than the movies this thing takes. I was amazed how absolutely horrible the movies are after my previous two cameras - one 3.2MP and the other 6.0MP. I realize this is not a camcorder, but it's nice being able to take brief movies when the moment arises - as my old Canon was able to. Overall - I am very dissapointed with this camera. I have not used the underwater capabilities but have let my 3 year old niece use it to see how rugged it is. Actually that's the best thing so far - I have no worries that she'll break it and don't really care if she does. Back to Canon now..... diff --git a/SINAI-SA-corpus/1/ref1650_rate1.txt b/SINAI-SA-corpus/1/ref1650_rate1.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..9e4922991355dd8b8139dec41675914595e94628 --- /dev/null +++ b/SINAI-SA-corpus/1/ref1650_rate1.txt @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ + 1030 SW leaked in less than 5 ft of fresh water!, September 7, 2008 + ByD. Morgan (Lake Tahoe, CA) - See all my reviews +I bought an Olympus 1030 SW in May, and first used it 6/28/08, with 75 photos taken on it total. I last used it 8/28/08 when snorkeling in Lake Tahoe (fresh water, depth of 5 ft). On 9/5/08 when I tried to use it again, it started, beeped 4 times, then shut down. Charger says the battery is fully charged, and the "View" mode works (where the camera also indicates a fully-charged battery), but cannot otherwise take photos or videos. Was shocked to see that Olympus warrantee excludes damage caused by water, shock, or "abuse" to a supposedly waterproof, shockproof and crushproof camera. After the horror stories I see posted on the Internet regarding Olympus "No Service" and charging people to fix their defective/leaking cameras, I'm considering contesting the credit card charge I bought it with. Be warned! You may get lucky and get a "Good" Olympus 1030 SW, but their quality control appears to be letting some defective, non-waterproof units get into the retail stores. I would NOT trust this camera on a "Once-in-a-lifetime" trip ! diff --git a/SINAI-SA-corpus/1/ref1655_rate1.txt b/SINAI-SA-corpus/1/ref1655_rate1.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..a35a13fb2e038ab3305c93352825dce2263b253d --- /dev/null +++ b/SINAI-SA-corpus/1/ref1655_rate1.txt @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ + Camera Leaks, August 1, 2008 + BySouthern Bell (New Orleans) - See all my reviews +WARNING! I bought this camera to use on a trip to Anguilla & the camera leaked!! This is not a user error, I was very careful! It happened not once but twice & the second time the camera stopped working. Another couple on our snorkel trip had the same camera they had also bought for their trip & it too leaked. They were able to recover their photos after drying it out but the screen had water in it & the photos all had a blurry area in the same location on all the photos from water. It would be a great camera if it worked but I would NOT trust it with your vacation photos. Olympus clearly needs to work out some bugs before this is ready for purchase! diff --git a/SINAI-SA-corpus/1/ref1658_rate1.txt b/SINAI-SA-corpus/1/ref1658_rate1.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..9a3f8922d55f5436110da4738ab0cc1f4830e99c --- /dev/null +++ b/SINAI-SA-corpus/1/ref1658_rate1.txt @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ + Do not buy this camera!!!! , August 5, 2008 + ByDavid "DaveM42" - See all my reviews +Do not buy this camera!!!! it is the worse camera ever. We were at the lake and the camera stopped working and you can see some water had entered the camera. I sent the camera in to Olympus and they told me that I have to pay $120 to get fix after I paid $400 for it and they actually told me that I have to send the camera every year to get it refurbish. After complaining about the misleading advertisement, the lady actually told me you can go to the web and express your feelings!!!! EVERY YEAR PAY $120 - IT IS NOT WORTH THE MONEY - AGAIN DO NOT BUY!!!!! diff --git a/SINAI-SA-corpus/1/ref1662_rate1.txt b/SINAI-SA-corpus/1/ref1662_rate1.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..188d9f6e46ae1da1caf05e72fa30b44f7c53bcf6 --- /dev/null +++ b/SINAI-SA-corpus/1/ref1662_rate1.txt @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ + What a disappointment, June 18, 2008 + ByKJL (MD, USA) - See all my reviews +I read the reviews about poor, grainy picture quality-they all sounded like they came from more experienced photographers so I figured an amateur like myself would never notice. WRONG! We bought this camera because our old Sony wasn't taking pictures like it used to after being abused by our two young boys for 5 years-even after all that, our old Sony takes better pics at the lowest resolution (under 1 megapixel)in bad lighting than the Olympus at the highest megapixel (10.1) in good lighting. We tried everything and couldnt get a picture that wasn't grainy, at best. Also, DON'T EVEN TRY to take pics at a sporting event-the shutter speed and reset is so slow that I took a picture of my 5 year old son getting handed the football at the 20 yard line and it didn't reset until after he was done celebrating in the end zone. At his Kindergarden graduation he had to walk 100 feet to the podium...I could only take one shot it was SO SLOW. Definitely a DO NOT BUY...a terrible shame considering how cool the Shockproof, Waterproof features are. diff --git a/SINAI-SA-corpus/1/ref1667_rate1.txt b/SINAI-SA-corpus/1/ref1667_rate1.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..5766704cc4d8d5a2791f1ad59cbb4a8f0f9bda9b --- /dev/null +++ b/SINAI-SA-corpus/1/ref1667_rate1.txt @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ + Camera is NOT waterproof, November 22, 2008 + ByM. Grue - See all my reviews +I bought this camera specifically to take pictures snorkeling in Fiji. I had used it in the rain and it was fine. Minute I tried to take a picture underwater (less than 1m down, and it should be good to 10m) it broke. Water leaked into the body, ruining the card and battery. Thankfully it was a new card and I didn't lose any pictures. I am NOT the only one this happened to. Another woman at the resort I was at had the exact same camera and it broke the exact same way. I, now camera-less and complaining about it, met three other people who had similar problems. Everyone who has one of the 700s or the 850 has no problems. But the 1030 is faulty. Thankfully, the camera was under warranty and it was repaired and the battery and card were replaced. I still won't trust it underwater however. I'm going to buy it a case. diff --git a/SINAI-SA-corpus/1/ref1671_rate1.txt b/SINAI-SA-corpus/1/ref1671_rate1.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..5c04eeacef478842b1a5cdea71ff282946c28c36 --- /dev/null +++ b/SINAI-SA-corpus/1/ref1671_rate1.txt @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ + Camera Leaks DO NOT PURCHASE, January 14, 2009 + ByD. Jones "Brewer" (Charlotte NC) - See all my reviews +Bought this camera for our 12 day adventure trip to Costa Rica. Camera stopped working after day 6. Was extra careful to check all seals before using in water. After one day of canyonering and rappeling down waterfalls, another day of zip lining in the rain, some light use in the pool and a brief moment in the ocean it died. LCD went dead and camera was full of water. Camera was never more that a foot or two under water. Looked like the water had been in there for a while too since it came out green colored and the battery contact points were corroded. Have not even had a chance to see how the 300 or more pictures I took came out. Hopefully I can retrieve the pics from the M card. It looks like a sealed unit and is not corroded. Guy on our canyoneering trip noticed the camera and mentioned that he bought the same one for his trip as well and it died 6 days after he was using it in the ocean for surfing shots. Very disapointed. I am now past the 14 day return policy date too. Looks like the fun is just beginning on this purchase. Will add more details after I try to resolve this issue. diff --git a/SINAI-SA-corpus/1/ref167_rate1.txt b/SINAI-SA-corpus/1/ref167_rate1.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..074a8d00b3c85b2153f4fcb42b8fcdd100007a45 --- /dev/null +++ b/SINAI-SA-corpus/1/ref167_rate1.txt @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ + New Yorker, June 24, 2008 + ByStern Fan (NY) - See all my reviews +Buyer beware! The A590IS requires two alkaline batteries; however the batteries last approximately one to two weeks or less than approx. 75 photos. The low battery indicator appears way too often. The A590IS has 8MP packed into a small sensor chip which causes the photo details/sharpness to be less than say a 5MP on the same size chip (it's called "noise" in a photo). Advice when buying a digital camera; more MP is not necessarily better. Look at the ratio of MP to chip size/capacity. The lower the ratio of MP to chip capacity = more noise, because the MP take too much space on the chip thus blurring the photo with more pixels. If you buy the A590IS, Canon packs 8MP on a small chip thus creating noise. I had a Canon A610 for two years; 5MP on a small chip but alot less noise than the A590. My A610's sensor chip died after two years (black LCD screen). Bottom line, digital camera technology is not reliable; the life expectancy is not long. At least film cameras lasted more than two years . . . diff --git a/SINAI-SA-corpus/1/ref1680_rate1.txt b/SINAI-SA-corpus/1/ref1680_rate1.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..3cbd67ace4a6edc21013d6df6924da2bd953941d --- /dev/null +++ b/SINAI-SA-corpus/1/ref1680_rate1.txt @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ + Consider another camera, August 9, 2008 + ByBigStoner (Dallas, Texas USA) - See all my reviews +While I've been happy with this camera for the past 45 days, now that I'm in Hawaii and on vacation, it stopped working almost immediately. There are numerous positive reviews of this camera but it appears there are growing "issues" with an apparent design flaw - I count three reviews already from unhappy owners of this camera. Unfortunately, we've already bulked up on xD cards and other accessories but are now considering spending a likely small fortune to have our unit repaired, after vacation, and buying another underwater camera, most likely a Sony or Canon with an underwater housing, to be shipped to us overnight. Overall, a very expensive experiment with Olympus...and their Service Department was very unhelpful in this situation - send it to us and we'll fix it in 5-7 business days. I would suggest you carefully look at your options BEFORE buying this particular camera. diff --git a/SINAI-SA-corpus/1/ref1683_rate1.txt b/SINAI-SA-corpus/1/ref1683_rate1.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..7fbf690201638a77fe751e6e3cedf397c0977493 --- /dev/null +++ b/SINAI-SA-corpus/1/ref1683_rate1.txt @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ + Stopped working the first time it went into the water, January 9, 2009 + ByE. Ruby - See all my reviews +I bought this as a Christmas present for my brother and he said it stopped working the first time he took it into the water. This might be a defective build but there seems to be plenty of people that had similar problems. diff --git a/SINAI-SA-corpus/1/ref1709_rate1.txt b/SINAI-SA-corpus/1/ref1709_rate1.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..d00fd2de8a4205d7646b939aa02e9727fa3a3975 --- /dev/null +++ b/SINAI-SA-corpus/1/ref1709_rate1.txt @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ + Poor quality, not waterproof, February 4, 2009 + ByR. Ward - See all my reviews +Do not buy this camera if you are planning to use it underwater. I used it for two days while snorkeling and the camera shut down and I was not able to use it for the rest of our vacation. The frame around the shutter fell off and all the black paint on the front of the camera came off. I sent it to Olympus and they sent it back painted with the metal frame glued back on, but they never addressed the waterproof issue. The camera is a great idea, but the quality is terrible. diff --git a/SINAI-SA-corpus/1/ref1769_rate1.txt b/SINAI-SA-corpus/1/ref1769_rate1.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..5c7254986e54974112a60eb71bbfb51f11f3edc1 --- /dev/null +++ b/SINAI-SA-corpus/1/ref1769_rate1.txt @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ + Not really a warrantied product, April 8, 2008 + ByJ. Soares (Huntsville, AL) - See all my reviews +Hello, The Camera is great, but if you buy it from Amazon and it breaks, Pentax doesn't accept invoice from Amazon as proof of a warrantieable product. So basically amazon is trying to sell you an unwarrantied product. If you want it, go buy it somewhere else. diff --git a/SINAI-SA-corpus/1/ref1772_rate1.txt b/SINAI-SA-corpus/1/ref1772_rate1.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..c2042ccf44acd0034fecafdc901573493e223b06 --- /dev/null +++ b/SINAI-SA-corpus/1/ref1772_rate1.txt @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ + Pentax K10D problem, November 2, 2007 + ByC. Maclauchlan (Seattle, WA USA) - See all my reviews +I truly wish more on line retailers would use the US Mail to deliver. 98% of my packages arrive within 3 days and the price is quite competitive i believe. I would even be happy to pay a FEW dollars more for this. This provider uses DHL which takes 10 days or so to deliver...and offers a 2 or 3 day delivery for a LOT more money. The camera worked perfectly, taking stunning photographs for 2 days and then froze-up. The return process involved the provider sending me a DHL return label via DHL (10 more days) vs e-mailing it, the return via DHL (10 more days) and they assure me that the replacement is on it's way but as it's only been 5 days since they sent it I still have almost a week to wait. I didn't look for user performance reviews of this camera before purchasing it...shame on me. diff --git a/SINAI-SA-corpus/1/ref1939_rate1.txt b/SINAI-SA-corpus/1/ref1939_rate1.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..62edf58346d42ef5bbfb92d93a8d8eec54348a9b --- /dev/null +++ b/SINAI-SA-corpus/1/ref1939_rate1.txt @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ + Returned item for exchange, January 25, 2009 + ByRosendo Lomas (Sanford, NC, USA) - See all my reviews +Every picture I took, in all level of light, outside, inside, flash, snow scene, and in every camera mode possible (14 modes?) was perfect on the camera monitor but when loaded onto my computer was very dark. My lenses are: SMC Pentax-A, 1:1.4 50 mm and SMC Pentax Zoom, 1.4, 45mm to 125mm. Both are fine on my Pentax MX film camera, I've used them for years. Are my lenses not compatible with the K200D? Thank you Rosendo Lomas, Sanford, NC, [...] diff --git a/SINAI-SA-corpus/1/ref39_rate1.txt b/SINAI-SA-corpus/1/ref39_rate1.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..ffbd5c8e5c945d7a328cd9098706cbd595809e23 --- /dev/null +++ b/SINAI-SA-corpus/1/ref39_rate1.txt @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ + Surprisingly disappointed., February 11, 2009 + ByScott Gitlin "EssGee" (Howard Beach, NY) - See all my reviews +I purchased this camera based on the mostly exceptional reviews on many sites. However, after using it one time and downloading the pictures to my computer the aperture priority (Av) and manual (M) modes would not function. I could not power on the camera in either mode. If I was in a different mode and turned the function dial to either Av or M, the camera would shut off. Since I had the camera for over 3 weeks, I got an RMA from Canon and sent camera back. Received a camera back with same problem and different serial number. What followed was a lot of grief arguing with Canon customer care. Fortunately, Adorama/Amazon stood by the product and gave me a full refund. diff --git a/SINAI-SA-corpus/1/ref46_rate1.txt b/SINAI-SA-corpus/1/ref46_rate1.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..d1856418bf0c9cb99b95b3760e390e2fe559f6b4 --- /dev/null +++ b/SINAI-SA-corpus/1/ref46_rate1.txt @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ + not a great camera, February 9, 2009 + ByBrianna Sapp (Central Washington, WA USA) - See all my reviews +I read the other reviews and was very excited to buy this camera. What a disappointment. It was a pain to take a picture and all the pictures were poor quality. The shutter was very slow and the quality was bad. I ended up going back to my kodak easyshare that is only 4mp. Amazon was great about the return tho! diff --git a/SINAI-SA-corpus/1/ref498_rate1.txt b/SINAI-SA-corpus/1/ref498_rate1.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..af53a8c1bb41f6ccc605b22b71f3df003a8dee1d --- /dev/null +++ b/SINAI-SA-corpus/1/ref498_rate1.txt @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ + Lens Errors Still a Problem, June 17, 2008 + ByK. Marshall "Katmarsh" (Reno, NV) - See all my reviews +This is the second Power Shot camera I've owned I've had the lens get stuck on in less than 4 years, but of course after the warranty ran out. I kept it in a case and was very careful with it, but the lens got stuck anyway. The next camera I buy will probably NOT be a Canon, and I've only owned Canons up to this point. diff --git a/SINAI-SA-corpus/1/ref596_rate1.txt b/SINAI-SA-corpus/1/ref596_rate1.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..191194cc15de7373b92c95c2ba337712225b4afe --- /dev/null +++ b/SINAI-SA-corpus/1/ref596_rate1.txt @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ + very disappointing, May 2, 2008 + Bysylvia rose (seattle, wa United States) - See all my reviews +I previously owned a Powershot A70. I got beautiful photos and it was great for traveling. I own SLRs and know how to shoot photos, but I like a small camera for certain events. I thought another Powershot was the only way to go. I practiced with it for a couple of weeks and only got 3 photos that were in focus. It doesn't seem to make a difference which mode I shot in, or the lighting conditions, every photo turned out poor. I finally sent it back and I'm trying another camera. diff --git a/SINAI-SA-corpus/1/ref632_rate1.txt b/SINAI-SA-corpus/1/ref632_rate1.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..1e71c48ae5c61252e08f826cde0c86cb1b42c4de --- /dev/null +++ b/SINAI-SA-corpus/1/ref632_rate1.txt @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ + FIXED, and now works great! (was: Horrible with anything but ideal lighting), October 30, 2007 + ByJonathan Camfield (Washington, DC, United States) - See all my reviews +UPDATED: I sent the camera in after a phone call to tech support and there was a hardware problem (repaired, under warranty), and it works like a charm now. I've added the CHDK set of tools (guide here:http://lifehacker.com/387380/turn-your-point+and+shoot-into-a-super+camera) and am getting awesome HDR photos and amazing tools. Sure, it has great features, but you might as well buy a fully manual camera, because you'll be messing with custom settings any time you want to take anything but a shot in ideal lighting. Bright daylight? The photos turn out dark. Night/low light? Unless the subject is less than a foot away, the flash will fail to illuminate them and again - underexposure. This camera ruined my photography of my trip to India. Maybe I have a dud camera. diff --git a/SINAI-SA-corpus/1/ref639_rate1.txt b/SINAI-SA-corpus/1/ref639_rate1.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..a55d85c18d1a916b9cbba0210d5507d4262c3d6d --- /dev/null +++ b/SINAI-SA-corpus/1/ref639_rate1.txt @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ + Cannon 360A , October 31, 2007 + Bysilvia elias "SE" (NJ Tnpke) - See all my reviews +The pictures with this camera are of poor quality, and cannot be used for the internet. If you have to take pictures of items to place on the internet, this is not the camera with which to do it. We just purchased it, and took our first pictures today. It is worse than our old Nikon. diff --git a/SINAI-SA-corpus/1/ref836_rate1.txt b/SINAI-SA-corpus/1/ref836_rate1.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..651869bc69b733c92a0e07b0b25a97e17fdf86d2 --- /dev/null +++ b/SINAI-SA-corpus/1/ref836_rate1.txt @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ + Lens Error within 3 Weeks, July 13, 2008 + ByJames Lomas (San Diego, ca) - See all my reviews +This was a great camera--until it stopped working completely within 3 weeks. There was no 'incident' or warning... but half an hour after making some movies, I went to turn the camera on and I got the message "Lens Error, Restart Camera." I've tried everything, and I can't even retrieve the photos onto my computer. So even though I expect Canon to replace this camera, since I bought it for a trip and can't take any photos, I am really bummed that it stopped working. I think they must have been using a cheaper manufacturing process, and we are all paying for it. I've used Canon products for years, and I support the company... but I strongly recommend getting a more reliable camera than this one. diff --git a/SINAI-SA-corpus/1/ref878_rate1.txt b/SINAI-SA-corpus/1/ref878_rate1.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..43132a61773752f290d6e742d8b0ccbe31b67433 --- /dev/null +++ b/SINAI-SA-corpus/1/ref878_rate1.txt @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ + Canon cameras FAIL - waste of money!, January 23, 2009 + ByK. Luiten "alohagirl" (Kauai, HI USA) - See all my reviews +I like the image quality but have had 2 Canons fail within months of purchase. Canon is making too many lemons. BEWARE! Google "Canon Powershot lens error" to see the problems you may encounter buying a Canon. diff --git a/SINAI-SA-corpus/1/ref941_rate1.txt b/SINAI-SA-corpus/1/ref941_rate1.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..e4acfc53a2b3bd6f5383a474e559687b386d37c8 --- /dev/null +++ b/SINAI-SA-corpus/1/ref941_rate1.txt @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ + I gave this camera a shot and it failed me, October 11, 2008 + ByHenry Y. Ho - See all my reviews +I bought this camera to be used for an convention and during the convention it has gotten the fatal lens error problem. I have only had this camera for about 5 weeks and hopefully amazon will replace it or Canon will cover it in warranty. I really thought this fatal lens problem wasn't a problem but it is. I hope I get a new one and sadly enough I cannot take pictures for this convention I am at. I suggest stay away from this product. I will change my review if things are fixed. edit: Called up Canon and they were very helpful. They took a look at it and repaired it free of charge so it ended up only costing me the shipping cost which was about 12bucks with insurance/confirmation. Would rate 3 stars now due to good support and decent camera but known faulty issue should be considered in buying this camera. diff --git a/SINAI-SA-corpus/1/ref947_rate1.txt b/SINAI-SA-corpus/1/ref947_rate1.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..11b8b023455b56248f46e36d4460c2d092ff5f41 --- /dev/null +++ b/SINAI-SA-corpus/1/ref947_rate1.txt @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ + Serious Autofocus Problem, January 3, 2009 + ByDon65 - See all my reviews +The SD1100 IS is my fourth Digital Elph camera. The previous three have been wonderful cameras. The SD1100 IS is not a good camera. It has serious autofocus problems. The autofocus in flash mode is not reliable. Approximately 20% of the photos taken with flash are out-of-focus. I have pictures taken on a tripod, with flash in which not a single object within the photoframe is in focus. I suggest you avoid this camera. diff --git a/SINAI-SA-corpus/2/ref1079_rate2.txt b/SINAI-SA-corpus/2/ref1079_rate2.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..e62644699dfd603ce55b1660daf6d3c62f55a7f0 --- /dev/null +++ b/SINAI-SA-corpus/2/ref1079_rate2.txt @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ + Decent camera, but nothing to get too excited about, November 7, 2008 + ByChristopher Obert - See all my reviews +I think this camera would be a great choice for someone who is looking for a cost effective digital P&S and will be only taking photos of posing adults. The features it offered were pretty neat, I really liked the option that focused on one color and made the rest of the photo black and white. Very neat. Now for the bad, my unit was slightly defective (I assume), all of the photos were slightly out of focus, resulting in fuzzy images. But most of the reviews of this camera rave about the picture, quality, so I assume that my camera was defective and an anomaly. The other issue this camera had was the delay between telling the camera to take a picture (i.e. pressing the button) and the camera actually taking the photo (i.e. the image is captured). The camera had about a 1/2 second delay between the two events. This sort of delay is completely acceptable if you are taking photos of adults who know to hold their pose. But if you are taking photos of 2-year olds, forget it. All you get are the backs of little heads. I guess it is possible that the delay in my camera was a result of the auto-focus defect. But then I went to Circuit City to compare my camera to theirs (to make sure it was defective), I noticed that the Sonys were far faster than the Canons. The DSC-W150, DSC-W170, DSC-T70, and the DSC-T77 all were noticeably faster than the Canons. All of these cameras though are more expensive than the Canon SD1100, some much more so, and they also require special Sony proprietary memory, which costs extra as well. But I must say, if you are taking photos of young children, I highly recommend that you try one of the Sonys. They are the by far the fastest cameras out there. diff --git a/SINAI-SA-corpus/2/ref1094_rate2.txt b/SINAI-SA-corpus/2/ref1094_rate2.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..e8127748e598af9211cf042f6e807e1f88262e3c --- /dev/null +++ b/SINAI-SA-corpus/2/ref1094_rate2.txt @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ + Canon, September 30, 2008 + ByJoPaul "jp" (Baltimore, Md.) - See all my reviews +I'm very disappointed in this camera. it was purchased a month ago. I took no more than 10 pictures and the camera says that the memory is full. I fully expected to be able to take more than 10 pictures with this camera. diff --git a/SINAI-SA-corpus/2/ref1158_rate2.txt b/SINAI-SA-corpus/2/ref1158_rate2.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..083e343478a75e779d22acc8ff1542f5bdaaac2c --- /dev/null +++ b/SINAI-SA-corpus/2/ref1158_rate2.txt @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ + Only lasts 6 months, February 28, 2005 + Bytessa (Guarapuava, Parana, Brazil) - See all my reviews +I was given this camera as a going away gift when I moved to brazil one year ago. The camera was fine for about 6 months. It has not been exposed to any harsh elements or dropped. I did not use anything but Kodak recommended american bought batteries. But in the summer the camera just died...I replaced the batteries with brand new ones a few times (even batteries Kodak recommended) but the camera will not turn on. Now I have a camera that DOES NOT HAVE POWER and no longer works. I even still have pictures in the camera! I contacted the company and the best Kodak can offer me is service which costs more than to buy a camera of the same quality. Overall I am quite disappointed, with the camera and Kodak company. diff --git a/SINAI-SA-corpus/2/ref1174_rate2.txt b/SINAI-SA-corpus/2/ref1174_rate2.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..bffcb5eb6bc267be9256598035492976ca1b0372 --- /dev/null +++ b/SINAI-SA-corpus/2/ref1174_rate2.txt @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ + Camera = good; Software = horrible, November 14, 2006 + ByWho-lee E-wha (Seattle, WA USA) - See all my reviews +I've had no problems with the camera itself, but the necessary Kodak software is so horrible, that it makes me avoid the camera too. The software makes it difficult to download select photos versus the entire collection on the camera. It also has skimpy editing features. I have to jump around from the Kodak software to a microsoft one and then another from a different website in order to get all the different changes I want in a picture. diff --git a/SINAI-SA-corpus/2/ref1182_rate2.txt b/SINAI-SA-corpus/2/ref1182_rate2.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..99b82d9f303b1cabfdca73bfb51abaeca230020c --- /dev/null +++ b/SINAI-SA-corpus/2/ref1182_rate2.txt @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ + Poorest images in 4MP class..., December 17, 2004 + ByJAB "JAB" (SLC, UTAH) - See all my reviews +This camera gives images great color depth BUT images are of poor quality with respect to noise, artifacting, and being grainy. Also, the camera has a VERY slow shutter! Don't count on ever getting a child's smile with this one. In addition, the camera uses up a set of batteries within ~40 shots! (even with the LCD viewer turned off!) diff --git a/SINAI-SA-corpus/2/ref1183_rate2.txt b/SINAI-SA-corpus/2/ref1183_rate2.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..ea80bd47103424f30161d73552dd7668ce25be2d --- /dev/null +++ b/SINAI-SA-corpus/2/ref1183_rate2.txt @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ + great at first, November 22, 2008 + ByB. Johnson (Las Vegas, NV USA) - See all my reviews +I recieved this as a gift a couple years ago and used it off and on up until about six months ago when I went to use it and it refused to work properly. The paper kept getting jammed and once I'd fix the jam and try with another sheet, it did it again! I'm done trying to make it work, because it's way too much of a hassle. I wouldn't recommend it if you're hoping to use it for a lot of pictures and for a longer time period than a year or so. diff --git a/SINAI-SA-corpus/2/ref1185_rate2.txt b/SINAI-SA-corpus/2/ref1185_rate2.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..3bc502bed96e8bd30a8fc07c5040873d355c753e --- /dev/null +++ b/SINAI-SA-corpus/2/ref1185_rate2.txt @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ + severely underpowered flash, December 28, 2004 + A Kid's Review +I nioted a couple of people commenting on the poor flash and then a a person upbraiding those persons for expecting too much. I have been working with cameras for about 30 years and digitals for 12 years since we had one of the early models at our our newspaper. I have used quite anumbe rof the $150 to $250 range small digitals like the 7340 and bought a 7340 for my daughter over christmas. I have to say for the price range this camera has a very poor flash. It is not just a bit underpowered but markedly so compared to this size and price range digital. when I noted how bad the flash was we compared identical indoor shot with four cameras, the 7430, a canon, an olympus and a sony all in the under $200 range of this camera. we are keeping the camera, the optics and several other elements make it a decent camera, but there is NO question this camera has a very underpowered flash. the software is also pretty cumbersome compared to other software in the class as well. diff --git a/SINAI-SA-corpus/2/ref1187_rate2.txt b/SINAI-SA-corpus/2/ref1187_rate2.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..a3d9671415ea6a691b64f4e1a45d982aa39737b1 --- /dev/null +++ b/SINAI-SA-corpus/2/ref1187_rate2.txt @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ + Disposable Camera?, March 6, 2006 + ByC. Epperson - See all my reviews +WE bought this camera 2 years ago and were satisfied until recently. Of course the camera stops working properly when you most need it. It started giving really dark photos the day our son was born. Now we have all of these horrible, dark pictures of the birth of our son. We have tried to get it serviced but every shop we take it to says that we need to mail it to kodak and that it will cost at least $150 to fix it. I didn't realize I had bought a disposable camera. I am really diappointed. diff --git a/SINAI-SA-corpus/2/ref1189_rate2.txt b/SINAI-SA-corpus/2/ref1189_rate2.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..e9772eeba58473bb8028694946091c5f1dfd441e --- /dev/null +++ b/SINAI-SA-corpus/2/ref1189_rate2.txt @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ + Returning it back in less than 24 hours., June 4, 2004 + By A Customer +My first digital camera was a Kodak, and it was awsome. After 5 years of use, I dedided that I needed one with a zoom. Thus I bought another Kodak, this one, the CX 7340. I have been disappointed with this camera. I took it tonight to my cousin's play, and could not get any decent shots from my 3rd row seat. Any slight movement of people on stage caused blurryness when I zoomed in and took a shot. 95% of the pics came out awful.Secondly, the Kodak Easyshare software does not fit on my computer screen, and there is no way to adjust it to make it fit on my screen. It is frustrating, because it cuts off the pictures on the most right, and there is even no way to scroll left or right to view these pictures. What were they thinking, that we all have 21" screens these days? I have my display at 800 X 600, which is most comfortable for me and many other people, and their software SHOULD compensate for this and not cause this problem, but it doesn't. I also have a newer computer, so there is NO EXCUSE for this problem. My old Kodak Picture Easy 3.1 software that came with my old camera is absolutely wonderful, and does NOT do this.Thirdly, the flash is unreliable. While taking pictures of my cousin on stage, when using the flash, I got MUCH darker pictures than when not using it. Very frustrating. Another problem is that when taking pictures of someone nearby, a few feet away, sometimes the picture is brighter on the left side than on the right. I noticed when looking at the flash directly that it is angled a bit to the left, so this is the reason why. I have no idea why they have done this, but it's annoying to have one side of the picture brighter than the other side in some pictures! I dunno if mine could be a defect.I do have to say that this camera takes very nice pictures during the day without a flash. Pictures come out sharp and very detailed, and absolutely wonderful. Too bad this doen't happen when taking pictures at night or in dark situations. VERY DISAPPOINTED. :-( There is obviously something wrong with the flash in this camera. Mine could be the only one with this problem, but I am returning it and trying a difft brand.Kodak should be the best, but my camera wasn't. diff --git a/SINAI-SA-corpus/2/ref1192_rate2.txt b/SINAI-SA-corpus/2/ref1192_rate2.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..29ff2955ba879dddc8f71825b02ec9b3d0765f29 --- /dev/null +++ b/SINAI-SA-corpus/2/ref1192_rate2.txt @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ + Not Thrilled, October 4, 2007 + ByAnnon - See all my reviews +I spent 2 years looking and waiting for the right camera to come around. I tried another Kodak easyshare as I like the EASY-ness of them. I was not happy with that one, so went to the V1003. I bought it at circuit city BIG mistake (they have a 14 day return) It is not possible to make sure ALL the features on the camera work in 14 days. And with this camera, they do not work. The video is VERY noisy! The camera keeps adjusting (why I don't know) and the internal noise causes noise in the audio of the video. Also with 10MP you'd expect perfection of colors etc. Not the case. There is a strange blue glow off of white objects in certain shots. The settings for beach etc for adjust to bright light changes the colors also. I took a picture of a pond covered in lily pads and the sun was at an angle that was too bright. I used the beach settings and a few others for bright light and the colors of the pond changed. The pond appears bright blue in some areas.....believe me this pond is NOT blue. Trying to take sun pictures with the "filters" causes a weird flower pattern...like a daisy. My previous camera was a simple Kodak Easyshare 3.1 and it took better pictures, and better video (no noise!). The buttons on the camera are inset a bit and very small. I have small hands and it still is difficult to press the buttons. I usually have to press on several times to get it to come on. As far as speed, there is too much time between pressing the shutter button and waiting for the green light to actually take the picture. If you expect to get a shot of something that happens quickly and you need your camera to respond quickly...you'll miss your shot. If this camera comes down in price significantly, it might be an ok buy... As you will see by my edit, this is another thing you have to do BEFORE you can do something else with the camera. There are too many steps and too many ways to miss what you want to capture. EDIT and UPDATE: to solve the problem with the noise in video if anyone has this issue, I found the following: When the camera is in the video mode. You can change the AF Control setting to Single Auto Focus mode, Please folow these steps: 1. Turn the camera on. 2. Set your camera to video mode. 3. Press menu button. 4. Move the Joystick up/down to highlight AF Control then press the OK button. 5. Choose Single AF, then press the OK button. 6. Press the Menu button to exit. diff --git a/SINAI-SA-corpus/2/ref1201_rate2.txt b/SINAI-SA-corpus/2/ref1201_rate2.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..69cb54eb15374aea56e33f251a4c2960000ca07e --- /dev/null +++ b/SINAI-SA-corpus/2/ref1201_rate2.txt @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ + Disappointing, February 5, 2008 + ByWilliam W. Krzymowski (Gallup, NM) - See all my reviews +This is the fifth Kodak digital camera I have bought and like two others it has needed a major repair after a minimal impact. The warranty is virtually worthless as the contract repair company simply says the damage was due to an impact and there is no recourse. The prior cameras took nice pictures, however this model never did work correctly. The flash often did not work for indoor shots. The Kodak cameras are simply too fragile and this is the last one I will buy. diff --git a/SINAI-SA-corpus/2/ref1203_rate2.txt b/SINAI-SA-corpus/2/ref1203_rate2.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..42e174c20a9078b2d86258107d9b291a014713f1 --- /dev/null +++ b/SINAI-SA-corpus/2/ref1203_rate2.txt @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ + Not as good as Canon, October 1, 2007 + ByNaratip Chinwong - See all my reviews +LCD not viewable in the sunlight or outdoor. Hard to choose and save setting. diff --git a/SINAI-SA-corpus/2/ref1205_rate2.txt b/SINAI-SA-corpus/2/ref1205_rate2.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..2fd0a5cc302a02659f5e7d3cc792a347773e661a --- /dev/null +++ b/SINAI-SA-corpus/2/ref1205_rate2.txt @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ + Could Use Some Improvement, October 17, 2007 + ByT. M. Urquhart Jr. "1955 T-Bird" (Baltimore, MD USA) - See all my reviews +I bought the V1003 last week. I was impressed with the 10 MP, the price, and the printing dock. I have one question however. Will you tell me what the heck it is with Kodak that they feel a viewfinder is no longer needed??? I get a bit queasy trying to focus and compose an image with just the screen in the back. A coupled viewfinder would really make it sweet in my humble opinion. Also, the shutter recycling time is indeed a bit slow, and I don't know why. I am reconsidering my purchase for a SONY or a CANON or NIKON. It's really too bad, though! It could have been much nicer if the camera was properly designed and engineered in the first place. diff --git a/SINAI-SA-corpus/2/ref1211_rate2.txt b/SINAI-SA-corpus/2/ref1211_rate2.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..3c40169fcb3b8cbc58d4a9f0ad0ee5d310d27dc1 --- /dev/null +++ b/SINAI-SA-corpus/2/ref1211_rate2.txt @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ + Kodak v1003, December 30, 2007 + ByD. Sosa - See all my reviews + I received one of these as a gift. It's a cute little point-and-shoot, with rounded edges that look like they were inspired by Apple. The screen is monstrous and the interface is simple enough. Personally I like the joystick-type navigation, although some of my more heavy-handed friends struggle with its delicate operation. A refreshing piece of innovation is the ability to recharge the battery while it is onboard the camera. External battery chargers are great for those who carry more than one battery and like to have a backup charging at all times, but I have never met one of those people. This is where I will cease praising the V1003. There are several reasons I returned the camera after owning it for three days. Firstly, the lack of an ultrasonic autofocus motor means any video taken by a moving photographer, or of a moving subject, will be laden with clicks that drown out recorded audio. This is because the motor that controls the AF makes enough noise to be picked up by the camera's microphone. The problem can be avoided by turning off the autofocus, but in many (read most) cases, this is completely unacceptable. Secondly, the shutter lag was so severe that I found myself taking pictures of the future. Even after pressing the shutter button half way so that it would finish focusing, once the shutter was triggered, almost two thirds of a second would elapse before the camera recorded anything. As most of my intended use for a camera is action photography, shutter lag is unacceptable. Finally, I have no use for 10 megapixels. If you plan to make posters, it becomes slightly more appropriate, but you will be disappointed by the quality obtained with the camera's tiny lens. It's been stated before in other reviews, so I won't harp on it, but beyond 5 or 6MP, pixel-count is just another way of keeping up with the Jonses. Instead of pixels, I look for features and responsiveness, and although the Kodak V1003 is ample in the first department, it lacks severely in the second. (For those who may be curious, I purchased a Canon S5 IS as a replacement. I will review it in a while.) diff --git a/SINAI-SA-corpus/2/ref1219_rate2.txt b/SINAI-SA-corpus/2/ref1219_rate2.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..6ec05c2cdbb15612628163af0a31ac8dda5b221f --- /dev/null +++ b/SINAI-SA-corpus/2/ref1219_rate2.txt @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ + Don't bother!!, January 28, 2008 + ByC. mccabe (Phila,PA) - See all my reviews +I bought this camera because I thought 10 megapixels would be better than the Kodak I have with 4 megapixels. It's not! Pictures come out blurry and it take so long for the camera to actually take the picture that your subject has chaged position and the picture looks terrible anyway. I would not have bought this camera if I had a chance to play with it first. It also needs a separate cord to work with the easyshare printer dock 6000 that I already owned. I am going to buy another camera and let my 15 year old have this one. Don't waste your money. diff --git a/SINAI-SA-corpus/2/ref1239_rate2.txt b/SINAI-SA-corpus/2/ref1239_rate2.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..3301da2a83779c5bf44d6f5b61567cd6ca6cb31d --- /dev/null +++ b/SINAI-SA-corpus/2/ref1239_rate2.txt @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ + Bad LCD, August 27, 2008 + ByJaclyn 0325 "Jackie" (Massachusetts) - See all my reviews +I recieved this camera as a gift for my birthday in March, and I had to send it back in early May to have the LCD screen repaired, I had not dropped it and the camera hadn't had any impact. It took a couple weeks to get my camera repaired and it worked great. Last night my camera was in the new case I purchased (thinking it would protect it better) which was inside my purse when my purse fell off my sofa. Once again, the LCD Screen is broken. I think it is ridiculous that a camera be so easily ruined. I am not going to pay to have my camera "fixed" again, only to have it to break again in a few months. It's a shame because I took some excellent pictures with it, and I really like the panoramic feature. I wouldn't rcommend this camera unless you're going to treat it like an "Egg Baby" for a High School health class. diff --git a/SINAI-SA-corpus/2/ref1241_rate2.txt b/SINAI-SA-corpus/2/ref1241_rate2.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..2f3967aa5b5bdaaf7eaafe5d91f9efb5b4821a5e --- /dev/null +++ b/SINAI-SA-corpus/2/ref1241_rate2.txt @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ + no good quality, July 25, 2008 + ByDEMETRUNKS - See all my reviews +this camera isnt what we expect, when you take pictures, the camera make change in pictures colors and photos quality is very poor, i repent to buy it. diff --git a/SINAI-SA-corpus/2/ref1243_rate2.txt b/SINAI-SA-corpus/2/ref1243_rate2.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..1717d5187b2d5a8ea56c94bbb85c40cb5042ebc0 --- /dev/null +++ b/SINAI-SA-corpus/2/ref1243_rate2.txt @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ + not the best, July 14, 2008 + ByT. Collado (BX NY) - See all my reviews +This camera has lots of features, but most are not worth it. The picture quality goes down to nothing when you use digital zoom, and videos and often dark and can not be edited. The lense is often getting stuck on the open position, so I will return it for refund and probably go back to a FUJI camera. diff --git a/SINAI-SA-corpus/2/ref1308_rate2.txt b/SINAI-SA-corpus/2/ref1308_rate2.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..e88ef5a46deb5c1e7bb57889e1b90bf377a27def --- /dev/null +++ b/SINAI-SA-corpus/2/ref1308_rate2.txt @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ + DISAPPOINTED, January 14, 2007 + ByLotLee (Kansas) - See all my reviews +I received this as a Christmas present. This digital camera works fine for still shots, pictures of my family, etc, but for action shots, kids playing outside, basketball games, etc. it is a BIG disappointment. I took 47 pictures of my son playing basketball in our school gym and only 5 of them were worth keeping. I've taken to several games/activities to try it out. I've tried using the different functions, adjusting the manual setting, and playing with the zoom but nothing has worked. Many of the shots are blurred, have shadows (because of movement), or are so dark the people can't be seen. I wish I would have known this before I asked for this camera. diff --git a/SINAI-SA-corpus/2/ref1341_rate2.txt b/SINAI-SA-corpus/2/ref1341_rate2.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..34cda720441bd0ee0e0a3e64579f399b8162e906 --- /dev/null +++ b/SINAI-SA-corpus/2/ref1341_rate2.txt @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ + Wouldn't work for son's graduation, May 27, 2008 + ByE. Nickler "ekaynick2" (ekaynick) - See all my reviews +I've had this camera for a year and a half only taking pictures periodically. I took it on a trip and was only able to take 2 pictures before the battery told me it was dead. I thought I might have not put it on the charger correctly. I was sure to put the camera correctly on the charger to prepare for my son's graduation. When the moment came to take the picture at his graudation the battery was dead. I have a friend who also had the same problem and we bought them at the same time. So if you want a good camera for a year and a half, this is a great one. If you want one longer, it'd be best to look somewhere else. diff --git a/SINAI-SA-corpus/2/ref1444_rate2.txt b/SINAI-SA-corpus/2/ref1444_rate2.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..810f2d81b8daa4aa3c418545181aeaa03d2332c4 --- /dev/null +++ b/SINAI-SA-corpus/2/ref1444_rate2.txt @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ + This camera will drive you insane!, September 14, 2003 + ByBill (Houston, TX USA) - See all my reviews +I read the user warnings: impossible low light autofocus, poor manual focus with no distance indicator, battery eater, buttons on the side can't be found when you need them but always hit by accident, no filter threads. I thought, It's a Nikon. Must be operator problems. I was wrong.This camera has a good flash and works well with Nikon external flash units, but there's a catch. The camera will not focus under conditions when you normally need a flash! No focus assist light, and the manual focus...you've got to be kidding: Hold down a button on the side of the camera while turning a knurled wheel on top. Under really bright conditions, you can sort-of tell when the image is in focus, but under those conditions, you probably don't need manual focus. If you think maybe you'll just estimate the distance under dim light and dial it in, well guess what? The focus distance indicator is a bar which slides between a flower and a mountain. How's that for precision measurement!Yep, it eats batteries. Buy two spares ($$ ouch!) and a rapid charger plus a car adapter. You'll always have batteries on you mind when you use this camera. You can turn off Continuous Autofocus and reduce battery drain, and noise, significantly, though.I found a press-on adapter for $25 to use standard threaded filters. That helped, but should not have been necessary on a $900 camera.And just wait till you hit the file type button by mistake--and discover you've changed from Fine (JPEG) to RAW, and have to wait 45 seconds for the 15MB file to save to CF, while you scratch your head trying to figure out what happened.Yes, the menus are a little complex and mastering the extensive feature set may take a while, but that's to be expected with this many features, although some would be better placed for quick access. Built-in macro focusing is good, too, but an aperture smaller than F8--at least F11 or F16--might give the depth of field you need for close-up photography. The 8:1 zoom is nice, with 35mm equivalent of 280mm, but the wide angle end is weak with only 35mm wide angle instead of the more usefull 28mm equivalent. And given the price of this camera, image stabilization should be included for hand-holding the telephoto zoom.But it's the low light focus that will drive you screaming into the night. A helper pointing a small flashlight or a laser pointer at your subject will help the camera to focus (you'll get used to the Canon people laughing at you), but you'll still be guessing on the composition, since the viewfinder display goes nearly black in low light. If Nikon could at least update the firmware to display manual focus distance in feet--that would be a help, but just try and contact anyone interested! You get referred to the incredibly lame FAQs and knowledge base every time!If you really want the precision framing of TTL viewfinders on a digital, save your money for a true digital SLR. diff --git a/SINAI-SA-corpus/2/ref1457_rate2.txt b/SINAI-SA-corpus/2/ref1457_rate2.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..5f96eb0997c6a88e0b634a50416ef7497f8a0a6b --- /dev/null +++ b/SINAI-SA-corpus/2/ref1457_rate2.txt @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ + Over Rated, May 17, 2006 + By4004CII - See all my reviews +I bought this camera after reading a very positive review in a major "consumer" based magazine. 8 months later the image chip went defective. Just as the same "consumer" magazine reported in a later issue. Nikon fixed this for "free", they would not pay for the incoming shipping ($30). Now 4 months later the flash does not work, the ISO settings do not change, the auto-focus is a no-go. What a piece of junk! Nikon won't pay for these problems either! DO NOT buy! Get the D50 or Rebel XT instead. UPDATE! Nikon has issued a service bulletin for this model. This is the second SERIOUS issue and this piece of junk went back for the second time in its 16 month life. I repeat-do NOT buy! Get the Canon Digital Rebel XT instead!!! diff --git a/SINAI-SA-corpus/2/ref1464_rate2.txt b/SINAI-SA-corpus/2/ref1464_rate2.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..e2de21bf46926873e2bbdb2e838995dffa55aff7 --- /dev/null +++ b/SINAI-SA-corpus/2/ref1464_rate2.txt @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ + Not a Camera for the Faint of Heart, October 19, 2007 + ByKimi F1 (Cardiff, CA United States) - See all my reviews +I've owned this camera since it first came out in 2003, and since I'm not a qualified camera "expert", I want to give you my thoughts on this camera. I'm giving this review as someone who is relatively new to digital "point-and-shoot" photography... First and foremost, study the Nikon manual. Then study it some more. The controls are overwhelming at times, provided you are a neo-phyte like myself. Second, for exterior photography on the normal setting, this camera cannot be beat! It is exceptional. The images are clear, clean, and colors are spectacular. I've photographed NASCAR at the California Speedway, and other events like the Coronado Speed Festival, etc., and the outdoor shots look great. Now for the indoor-shooting... This is where the camera gets its two star rating from me. I do not know how to select the manual control on-the-fly. I've tried to set up controls to shoot indoor photography, but I don't have weeks and weeks to learn the settings. I've photographed people who are standing completely still, slightly moving (my kids), low lighting conditions, fair lighting conditions, and still cannot get proper images to come out. The indoor photography is pitiful, as the colors are yellowish, muted, and nearly 90% of the time, the images are all blurred. The pop-up light is only good for 5-8 feet at best. I took some special shots of people who were stationary, and it appeared that the photo looked "good" when zooming in and out with the control. When I downloaded the CF card to my PC, the images were always blurred and the colors were way off. Mind you, I'm not a camera professional like many of the reviewers here, but rather I'm just an average "Joe" who would like to have decent indoor pictures that looked natural and were not blurred. I would sell this thing on Ebay if I could get more than a few hundred dollars for it, but I've already invested over $1,200 for the snap-on lens adaptors and protective lens cover which keeps the retractable lens from getting damaged. I bought this from a company in Canada back in 2003. All in all I'm happy with the exterior photos, but am very, very, disappointed with indoor pictures. I guess this thing requires a lot of tweaking, and many, many hours of studying the little manual that Nikon has provided. I would stay away from this and save your money for the newer Digital SLR's. I've had this for over four years now, and just wanted to write a review based on my experiences with this camera. Just a thought... diff --git a/SINAI-SA-corpus/2/ref1468_rate2.txt b/SINAI-SA-corpus/2/ref1468_rate2.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..72eb16e9df1e4dc21453f1b89f2a3ff0ee231a1c --- /dev/null +++ b/SINAI-SA-corpus/2/ref1468_rate2.txt @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ + Not the nikon quality I am familiar with...., December 3, 2003 + By A Customer +I have used Nikon SLR for about 15 years now and I have always admired the quality I get from them. A friend of mine let me play with his new 5700 to see what I think about it.I first asked him the price he paid and although it is abit on the high side, i dismissed it initially and went on to the test if really this camera does deliver relative to its price. Controls are well placed, a nikon quality i like and the materials used are top-notched. However image quality is not what I expected. I have seen and tried digicams from Olympus and Minolta and they have better color reproduction and image saturation. Even the Fuji S7000 seems to have better "printed image than the Nikon and to think that the Fuji only sells for U$600.00. If the Nikon were priced at least at the level of the others, I would be hard pressed not to reconsider it but it is no very competitive price and feature wise. diff --git a/SINAI-SA-corpus/2/ref1472_rate2.txt b/SINAI-SA-corpus/2/ref1472_rate2.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..0c1837d5f245302e4a1da2b9a84646fecce52ab0 --- /dev/null +++ b/SINAI-SA-corpus/2/ref1472_rate2.txt @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ + AF need serious improvement, May 31, 2004 + By A Customer +I think the camera is ok, interms of picture quality but to get the picture you want would sometime be impossible due to screwed up AF. I tried to take some pictures of kitten that are black and white stripes, and it was imposible to take a decent of kitten it self. if I focus on the kittens, it just won't focus correctly, unless you point at some surrounding object. even than blown up pictures are slightly blurie. when it comes to AF this is one POS. I would recomand this camera if you intend to take pictures of non moving object b/c of slow AF and slow shutter reponse. I have all my 35mm cameras are Nikon and really disappointed that they actually have this POS. diff --git a/SINAI-SA-corpus/2/ref1485_rate2.txt b/SINAI-SA-corpus/2/ref1485_rate2.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..8d49e1dd57b9b2b49df9bbae0922ad0f3162a97c --- /dev/null +++ b/SINAI-SA-corpus/2/ref1485_rate2.txt @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ + Maybe I Got A Lemon, September 21, 2002 + ByB. Mullins "Digital Rebel" (Venice, CA USA) - See all my reviews +After reading all of the reviews, I had high expectations for this camera. While the menus are very complicated, and seemingly needlessly so, they can be mastered. But the camera doesn't seem to be able to easily retain settings, despite following the manual as closely as possible. Battery life is quite short, despite not using the LCD screen or flash, and I couldn't find anyone that has additional batteries in stock.Other issues involved the camera's failure to connect to my computer [an iMac], although Nikon help desk couldn't figure out why. ....My previous digicam, a Canon A20, has performed flawlessly, and in fact took pictures as good--if not often better at the same outdoor event as this Nikon. I am not a high-end professional, nor do I think you should have to be one to produce superior results with this camera. I bought it specifically to be able to control the exposure more, i.e. shutter speed, along with a reduced "shutter lag."So far, I'm disappointed on all counts, even allowing for my lack of sophistication when it comes to high-end digital photography. The LCD screen is almost unconscionably small, which is housed in a much larger flip-out panel that could easily accomodate a larger one. To me this is an indication of the haphazard approach Nikon has made with this particular camera, having had no other experience with Nikon previously. I strongly recommend you try this out in person, and then make sure everything works before any time elapses. diff --git a/SINAI-SA-corpus/2/ref1517_rate2.txt b/SINAI-SA-corpus/2/ref1517_rate2.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..aaa7f016591b5117d40f26612d7ffa48da7205da --- /dev/null +++ b/SINAI-SA-corpus/2/ref1517_rate2.txt @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ + Awful autofocus--NOT happy with it., September 7, 2002 + ByMatt "mattfl1" (Naples, FL United States) - See all my reviews +I'm bringing this camera back in exchange for a Coolpix 4500 tomorrow. The camera is well built, does produce high quality, sharp pictures and has a boatload of features, however the autofocus is horrid. The autofocus doesn't work correctly in anything but bright sunlight. If you're shooting inside under slightly darker than normal conditions, the autofocus just hunts. It's very frustrating when you miss shot after shot because the camera is struggling to autofocus. If you want to stay with the Nikon name, check out the 4500. It's a far better performer. diff --git a/SINAI-SA-corpus/2/ref1526_rate2.txt b/SINAI-SA-corpus/2/ref1526_rate2.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..eddd692b9bb7e7c614305858b1e8fa202970b4ba --- /dev/null +++ b/SINAI-SA-corpus/2/ref1526_rate2.txt @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ + Internal flash stopped working, October 10, 2004 + ByMichael Doeff (San Francisco, CA) - See all my reviews +After a few months, the internal flash on my 5700 stopped working. I've been researching this issue on the web and I am definitely not the only one who has this problem. Getting this problem fixed by Nikon will cost you $250 - $300. I was not a big user of the flash in the first place but it is a huge disappointment to have a problem with such a basic feature on a "prosumer" camera. I have also had miserable results with the auto-focus in low light conditions. This is another common complaint about this camera. Now I wish that I had bought a Canon. diff --git a/SINAI-SA-corpus/2/ref1532_rate2.txt b/SINAI-SA-corpus/2/ref1532_rate2.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..a8419b855dd3ddbee8a2fe80af1fe08262b06e80 --- /dev/null +++ b/SINAI-SA-corpus/2/ref1532_rate2.txt @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ + SB & the dreaded flashing red light., March 2, 2006 + ByMemphisBytes "MB™" (USA) - See all my reviews +If your seriously considering one of the pieces of junk, then please go here 1st - http://vowe.net/archives/002211.html This will explain how many many people are a tad disgruntled at Nikon and this know problem. The fact that after a few months the camera will simply refuse to operate with a flash, internal OR external. Do yourselves a favor and buy another brand. The camera is shoddy and the customer support at Nikon is non-existant! diff --git a/SINAI-SA-corpus/2/ref1540_rate2.txt b/SINAI-SA-corpus/2/ref1540_rate2.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..bcfe5c71182bc24e2303381b37fe209b929c6aaa --- /dev/null +++ b/SINAI-SA-corpus/2/ref1540_rate2.txt @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ + slow focus, slow memory, but looks nice & it's nikon, March 24, 2005 + Bya pilgrim revolutionary "lost in durham" (somewhere between layovers) - See all my reviews +been very disappointed with the camera. i've used to travel to 12 different countries and the pic quality is good but way too slow to capture any large files other than normal and zooms so slow that it is painful. but i am selling mine if you want to buy one. diff --git a/SINAI-SA-corpus/2/ref1541_rate2.txt b/SINAI-SA-corpus/2/ref1541_rate2.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..01955c51e45c08dced82ef2d60912c631d63f843 --- /dev/null +++ b/SINAI-SA-corpus/2/ref1541_rate2.txt @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ + One big failing, September 2, 2004 + ByToledo shooter (Toledo, Ohio) - See all my reviews +Takes great pictures, but its one big failing is that its painfully s-l-o-w power up and focus makes it useless for candid people shots. My cheap little Casio digicam is three times faster on the draw. I kept Coolpix for a couple of months and then got rid of it. I lost too many shots. diff --git a/SINAI-SA-corpus/2/ref1547_rate2.txt b/SINAI-SA-corpus/2/ref1547_rate2.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..63f6869db512b02e3e16252d0896797c30be2f49 --- /dev/null +++ b/SINAI-SA-corpus/2/ref1547_rate2.txt @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ + Coolpix5700 Faulty Flash Problem, December 8, 2003 + ByRobyn A. Mellor (Mount Carmel, Tennessee United States) - See all my reviews +Cons: My husband and I purchased the 5700 in September 2002, making our decision only after reading all the glowing reviews on this overly priced camera. Now, don't get me wrong, the picture quality is great, however, one would think the internal flash would last a bit longer than six-months! I tried everything to restore it to the manufacturer setting - nothing worked! We ended up having to purchase a disposal camera to take indoor shots of our sons wedding in Alaska, which will probaby be a once in a lifetime trip for us! As for the batteries, better buy extra and get the charger for your cigarette lighter while your at it. You never know where you might be when your battery goes dead and you miss that all to awesome shot! Pros: Good photo qualityBottom line: Buy anything else but the 5700! diff --git a/SINAI-SA-corpus/2/ref1551_rate2.txt b/SINAI-SA-corpus/2/ref1551_rate2.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..50da0691ebb38f730a635488e0dc1f21bfc3bb36 --- /dev/null +++ b/SINAI-SA-corpus/2/ref1551_rate2.txt @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ + Bad Design, February 15, 2003 + ByJohann Lee (Pleasanton, CA USA) - See all my reviews +Nikon 5700 Digital CameraBefore you make a decision to buy the Nikon 5700 camera, consider a badly designed aspect on this camera's view finder. The picture you view through the electronic view finder, lags behind the real image, and it feel like what you see is being dragged across the viewer. In other words, for a fast moving scene, it is almost impossible. Another major draw back is a flare across the view finder. On a sunny day, you won't be able to properly compose a picture more or less when you are facing a bright subject. The view finder presents a wash out with vertical strips across even at low settings of 1SO 100. diff --git a/SINAI-SA-corpus/2/ref1555_rate2.txt b/SINAI-SA-corpus/2/ref1555_rate2.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..6213d079ad58259e17abf26786e9a0060690d888 --- /dev/null +++ b/SINAI-SA-corpus/2/ref1555_rate2.txt @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ + My Flash Went Bad After Only 2 Months, October 13, 2003 + ByLarry (Columbia, Missouri USA) - See all my reviews +Exactly two months ago I bought this camera and spent $$$ upgrading the memory and got a battery pack. Yesterday the flash stopped working. I contacted Nikon and described the symptoms and the rep said to send it in. I had read all the glowing reviews posted here BEFORE I bought the camera and the one review that related a similiar flash problem...I thought his was a fluke.....NOT!!!! We have yet to see if I get my camera back from Nikon in a timely manner and the camera,itself, stays healthy. diff --git a/SINAI-SA-corpus/2/ref1565_rate2.txt b/SINAI-SA-corpus/2/ref1565_rate2.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..a7c52e8a73b0656dd4d39fc55e243ea6bba81a7c --- /dev/null +++ b/SINAI-SA-corpus/2/ref1565_rate2.txt @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ + Good for watersports, not great on land., April 14, 2008 + ByJill (san francisco, ca) - See all my reviews +I spend a lot of time on and in the water and I bought this camera to stick in my pocket and go. It is very good for that. For general purpose use though it is poor-to-mediocre in comparison to other point and shoot digitals at this price that I looked at. I usually shoot slide film/ SLR, but I figured for the price this camera would probably take acceptable pictures. The good: the macro mode works very well and is fun to use. The underwater thing is as cool as it sounds. The camera is well built and rugged and easy to carry around. The battery life is outstanding. All in all it should be a great outdoors person's pocket camera The bad. The biggest problem (and it is a huge one) is the horrible program mode system. The lack of an aperture or shutter priority setting is a major, major issue in light of the bizarre pre-sets on this camera. For starters, the camera sets the aperture wide open, no matter what you're actually trying to take a picture of. I shot about 150 pictures in "Landscape" and "Portrait & Landscape" modes last week and every time the camera set the aperture to the max allowed by the zoomed lens, usually f/3.5. Even if you point it at a fluorescent light or bright water (so there are no low-light issues) it does not stop down. This is stupid. It means that the only thing in focus in most of the "landscape" photos was a tree-branch in the foreground or some guy's hat. There is no manual override. Apparently it is a fixed aperture camera. The only way is to zoom to the max which only has a max aperture of up to 5.6 or so. Of course this means that the wide angle feature is useless for landscapes. Even if you manage to get an appropriate f-stop, the camera has a problem picking appropriate ISO and shutter speeds, especially in low light. It seems to prioritize for low ISO, meaning that it also slows the shutter speed down, resulting in blurry and noisy photos. A speed of 1/40s with ISO 80 is pretty useless in terms of getting good handheld pictures vs speed of 1/250 and ISO 200, for example. Using the LED seems to fix this in the Macro mode but in other modes the camera insists on reducing shutter speed and opening up the lens inappropriately. You can set the ISO manually but the modes are fiddly and it's easy to forget if you switch back and forth a lot. Finally my autofocus simply refuses to focus on anything more than about 70' away. Even if I confirm spot-focus before shooting on a distant object it will be blurry in the final picture, while random closer objects are in focus. It is possible that there is something wrong with the camera I have as I can't imagine anyone designed it this way (right?). However I went to a local camera store and tried their two display models and had the same issues. It's going back. diff --git a/SINAI-SA-corpus/2/ref1572_rate2.txt b/SINAI-SA-corpus/2/ref1572_rate2.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..d24a9bc2ef7554aa11898fce65d426bd6482eb52 --- /dev/null +++ b/SINAI-SA-corpus/2/ref1572_rate2.txt @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ + Flawed, November 22, 2008 + ByJerald A. Lubecki "family man" (Palm Harbor, FL USA) - See all my reviews +The screen stopped working before a dozen pictures were taken. The warranty does not cover the shipping. Very expensive and disappointing. diff --git a/SINAI-SA-corpus/2/ref1621_rate2.txt b/SINAI-SA-corpus/2/ref1621_rate2.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..2d75278abafeb8f940a3f03491a7563196a96bcd --- /dev/null +++ b/SINAI-SA-corpus/2/ref1621_rate2.txt @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ + takes LOUSY, Grain, noisy picutres, November 30, 2008 + BySun Meng "Alex Sun" (Waltham, MA) - See all my reviews +I've always leaving 4,5 stars reveiws, and there is a reason I think 1030 sw sucks. I bought a refurbished one on Amazon on Oct 27,2008; and I first seen this camera when hiking with my friend in New Hampshire last winter, I heavily relied on the customer reviews on Amazon to make a decision (was going to by a canon SD), and somehow I pretty set up my mind in buying one so I just ignored the negative reviews and think they either got a lemon or they don't know how to shoot a good picture. And this Thanksgiving my friend came from Detriot to Boston and brought his Canon 1100is, we went to Boston, Harvard University and took a trip to Ipswich which is a beautiful town north of Boston. I wasn't trying to compare anything but just copied all our photos into one folder and boy was I surprised. ALL & EVERY picture that was taken by my $300 something camera was noisy and not focused well, while pictures taken by canon were way better. My friend tried to convince me that my investment was good but even he can tell the huge difference, all the details, focus are lost with this olympus SW 1030 camera. I know how to shoot good pictures and I am so pissed that I spend 300 bucks on this high-end camera and it takes lousy pictures. I was upgrade from a Canon A610 and bought my girlfriend a Canon SD 900, I moved to Olympus because I read an article said that they had a very good DSLR E520, so I figure the SW 1030 should be good, and also I do lots of hiking, mountaineering and sea kayaking, it's just the picture quality is too bad to tolerate, it's far worse than my 3-year-old A 610. Don't say I am not buying the right camera because this camera is good for waterproof, shockproof and all that things. Of course I love those features but I love good quality too!!!!!!!!! If you think quality matters than don't buy this camera, believe me or not you will find out yourself. I've sold mine after Thanksgiving plus the extra 60 bucks I spend on the cases, xD cards, I am thinking of moving to a canon sd 990 but don't have the money now, I'll just wait for the price drop on sd 990. diff --git a/SINAI-SA-corpus/2/ref1626_rate2.txt b/SINAI-SA-corpus/2/ref1626_rate2.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..6e9ac824e90e3f0193178f4bbd43fd59c41ad09e --- /dev/null +++ b/SINAI-SA-corpus/2/ref1626_rate2.txt @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ + Want just a point & shoot with 10 seconds of video?, March 30, 2008 + ByJames Shaules - See all my reviews + I bought this camera because of the ability to plunk it in the water. . . But I'm still returning it as you will read. I consider myself a skilled serious amateur photographer and currently own two Panasonic Lumix cameras (LX-1 I know, I did it even though I was aware of the problem. I do understand that this camera is designed to be used by the occasional photographer, but at $350 (I paid $400 at Amazon when it first came out) it seems that there should be at least some ability to consciously choose some settings without having to go into the "Mode Dial" "SCN" selection menu to find a comparable scene. The Mode Dial has the following settings: AUTO: "Shooting pictures with full automatic settings. The camera determines the optimum settings for the shooting conditions automatically" It changes ISO [sensitivity and color balance settings I think] - This is basically the point and shoot mode. Program auto: "Set the optimum aperture value and shutter speed. The camera automatically sets the optimum aperture value and shutter speed for the brightness of the subject." I didn't really try to figure it out, but I never did understand the difference between AUTO and PROGRAM AUTO modes. IMAGE STABILIZATION MODE: "Shooting pictures using digital image stabilization. This function reduces the blur caused by a moving subject or camera movement when taking pictures." So I wonder why there is a mode just for this rather than having a single button to turn it on and off? So is it like the Program Auto, or the Auto mode with image stabilization? Quien sabe? SCN mode: "Shoot pictures by selecting a scene mode according to the situation. You can shoot pictures by selecting a scene mode according to the situation." So there are more than a dozen "scenes" that you are supposed to scroll down through to find one similar to the one you are going to shoot. Here's the list "PORTRAIT / LANDSCAPE / LANDSCAPE +PORTRAIT / NIGHT SCENE*1 /NIGHT+PORTRAIT*1 / SPORT / INDOOR / CANDLE*1 / SELF PORTRAIT /AVAILABLE LIGHT*1 / SUNSET*1 / FIREWORKS*1 / CUISINE / BEHIND GLASS /DOCUMENTS / AUCTION*2 / SHOOT & SELECT1*2 / SHOOT & SELECT2*3 /BEACH & SNOW / PRE-CAPTURE MOVIE / UNDERWATER SNAPSHOT*4 / UNDERWATER WIDE1*4 / UNDERWATER WIDE2*4*5 / UNDERWATER MACRO". So what is a poor bloke to do? I know. "Oh wait! Let me shoot the picture of you, Johnnie, blowing out the candles. Margot! Tell him to wait! Now, Hmmm. Where was that mode? I know there supposed to be a way to take a picture of my kiddie blowing out a candle if you'll just give me a minute to find it. . . . " Methinks the various scenes that you can select thru the SCN mode probably address lighting issues, light color issues, etc. But still! It is too impractical to use it. I doubt many will ever use it though Olympus may try to push it as a selling point. Now, we come to the reason that I returned the camera. I play golf as well so today I went to use the camera in the movie mode for the first time in order to record my swing on video[swimming was to be later this week]. I had already set the camera to the VGA movie mode but when I pushed the button it turns out that you can only record ten seconds of video in VGA mode! That's ridiculous. There must be a lack of horsepower under the hood that it can't stream that resolution to the memory card, but it can in the QVGA mode since the resolution is less good. So, when I go to Hawaii in a couple of months and I want to shoot a video of my wife snorkeling with the dolphins in the water I'll be able to get ten seconds of video. Sounds peachy keen! That combined with the the dismal ability to choose the aperture and f-stop make it a sure returner for me. So sorry. . . :( So, I'm returning it despite the fact I bought a silicone skin, two extra batteries and two 2gb memory cards. diff --git a/SINAI-SA-corpus/2/ref1631_rate2.txt b/SINAI-SA-corpus/2/ref1631_rate2.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..590fc3fd6d6e4df525a9e1943c2b3793b9be6c0a --- /dev/null +++ b/SINAI-SA-corpus/2/ref1631_rate2.txt @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ + Olympus Stylus 1030SW 10.1MP Digital Camera with 3.6x Optical Wide Angle (Silver), September 19, 2008 + ByR. Oliver "Tito" (Jacksonville, FL United States) - See all my reviews +I recently bought this camera. So far I have noted that its pictures have a great deal of noise and are rather grainy. It is as sturdy as it is touted to be. I have not used underwater yet. It's picture preview is good, and the screen is bright and sharp. Takes poor flash pictures in the dark. Weak overall. diff --git a/SINAI-SA-corpus/2/ref1634_rate2.txt b/SINAI-SA-corpus/2/ref1634_rate2.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..f91121c279bb05a901043cbdbe82f4431c858a16 --- /dev/null +++ b/SINAI-SA-corpus/2/ref1634_rate2.txt @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ + Poor quality / Good features, April 21, 2008 + ByIgor (Atlanta, GA USA) - See all my reviews +The camera has cool features that you will not find on most digital cameras including the fact that it is crush proof, water proof, and freeze proof. These are all great but the quality of the pictures is lacking. I tried many different settings and set the size and the quality to the maximum size but the quality still suffered. I gave this camera 2 stars out of 5 because of the poor quality which is unacceptable for a camera at this price range and also the fact that this is the 3rd generation of these cameras. The quality of the pictures is more important to me than all of the features I mentioned above which is why I returned this camera and purchased a Canon Powershot SD790-IS. My previous camera was a Canon which I loved so I decided to stick with what I know will not disapoint me. If somewhat grainy and fuzzy pictures do not bother you and you need something that can handle rough terrain, kids, or clumsy hands than this camera is for you. If you are like me and prefer nice quality photographs than I recommend you steer clear. diff --git a/SINAI-SA-corpus/2/ref1636_rate2.txt b/SINAI-SA-corpus/2/ref1636_rate2.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..574020f84423e5105c85a8fed7416b1714cfa6d3 --- /dev/null +++ b/SINAI-SA-corpus/2/ref1636_rate2.txt @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ + Useless in poor light conditions, October 4, 2008 + ByOla E. Strandberg (Irvine, CA USA) - See all my reviews +My son came home from a school trip with my Canon Ixy 10 (bought in Japan, called Ixus 70 in Europe) dead after dropping it or carrying it in his pocket or whatever. So, I decided on getting a camera that could take rough handling. I had a Pentax Optio WP a few years ago, so I knew that underwater photography is a lot of fun. This camera is a sturdy piece. It feels MUCH heavier than other cameras of its size, which I can live with, given that you can drop it and all. Its programs are user friendly, the software that comes with it is OK and it takes decent pictures outside, but... Don't even bother inside or in poor light conditions. Sorry Olympus, but you don't come close to my old (lighter, cheaper but much frailer) Canon in any respect. The screen is not as clear and distinct as the Canon screen either. If all you need is a waterproof camera, go for Pentax. diff --git a/SINAI-SA-corpus/2/ref1653_rate2.txt b/SINAI-SA-corpus/2/ref1653_rate2.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..fe4e1ff59df811c16bf66a5b4c5a7b1d07177858 --- /dev/null +++ b/SINAI-SA-corpus/2/ref1653_rate2.txt @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ + Really surprised it is such a poor camera, March 16, 2008 + ByElwood P. Dowd (Carrboro, NC United States) - See all my reviews +Just got the green version last week as a tougher and easier-to-carry replacement for my Canon S60, then went on a weekend trip to the beach with the family. We split our time and pictures between hotel room, pool, and beach, so we got pictures in a bunch of different settings and lighting conditions. Overall, I have to say the pictures all leaned toward muddy, with weak color, and simply not so good. Slow focusing was a consistent problem. Maybe I have been spoiled by my earlier cameras (this is my first non-Canon compact digicam), but Olympus has no excuse for making such a mediocre camera in this price range. I know they can do better, they just don't seem to be trying. If Olumpus is skimping on the camera to pay for making it tough and still hit the $399 MSRP price point, they should consider just putting in the effort to make it a good camera and charging $449. I would have given a good camera a better review (I only pay for the camera once, but I use it 8,000 times). I gave it an extra star for being so immersable and droppable, which is totally cool. It made me feel better when my five-year-old would pick it up and start snapping. For the nearly $400, I simply expected a better camera. This one will get returned. diff --git a/SINAI-SA-corpus/2/ref1659_rate2.txt b/SINAI-SA-corpus/2/ref1659_rate2.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..0b7a6d428c30e03d326302e397b1f843358e3a90 --- /dev/null +++ b/SINAI-SA-corpus/2/ref1659_rate2.txt @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ + Great Camera on Paper..., August 26, 2008 + ByKhoa Ton (San Jose, CA USA) - See all my reviews +I really wanted to love this camera. It has everything I wanted: rugged, compact, waterproof, and takes great pictures. I currently have a Panasonic Lumix TZ-5, and a the Panasonic waterproof casing for it, and never used this combo with the Olympus Stylus 1030 SW around! It was so easy to carry the Stylus 1030 SW around on the pool/beach and into the water. It starts up almost immediately upon pressing the power button so I never missed a shot. I loved that it was shock-proof so I didn't have to mentally treat it with kid gloves, and there are no protrusions on the camera to worry about breaking. Now the bad news. After the first time going into the pool for about 3 feet underwater, the camera seems to be adversely affected. I was extra careful and followed the directions regarding checking the seals for foreign objects that may cause leaks, and they were properly closed. I noticed that the videos taken (maybe from this point on, maybe always had this problem) had a smudge about the middle of the screen. This was not dirt on the outside of the lens where I can get at and clean. It would disappear under certain lighting conditions, but most underwater shots had it. My guess is that it's an internal reflective defect or dirt on the optics. Curiously, I don't notice it in my photos, just videos. In addition to this, the lens would fog up during the night after some underwater excursions. The fog would cloud up the lens internally, so all photos and videos were foggy. Holding the camera in my hands would warm it up, causing the fog to get cloudier. As a work-around, I would air dry the camera each night with all its ports open, but this doesn't always work. Another major drawback of this camera that was not publicized very well is that you MUST use the type M+ XD memory card to record VGA in 30 frames/sec. Using the included adapter my 4GB MicroSDHC card, you are limited to 10 seconds VGA 30 frames/sec videos. You can record lower resolution or VGA with 15 frames/sec videos without the M+ XD memory card, though. Additionally, my videos would sometimes have strange regular very loud clicking sounds, about once click per second for certain stretches. This was very disconcerting. I also noticed that the videos of bright lights indoors would sometimes have vertical glares above and below the light sources. I never noticed this phenomenon on my TZ-5 videos. The final weird restriction that I found out only after using this camera was that it had two video modes: Underwater, and Non-underwater. In Underwater mode, you have no audio, but can use zoom. In Non-underwater mode, you can record audio, but cannot zoom. Perhaps the zooming caused horrible audio noises to be recorded so the engineers decided to never record audio while allowing zooming? In conclusion, the Olympus Stylus 1030 SW was everything I was looking for on paper and would have been a wonderful all purpose point-and-shoot photo and video camera for all occasions. Unfortunately, my particular unit seemed not be quite waterproof as advertised, and the model had some major design drawbacks in the areas of video recording. I really cannot recommend this camera based on the unit I had. Update 9/6/08 The return process at Amazon.com was extremely smooth and painless. I definitely recommend Amazon.com based on their customer service. Update 9/12/08 Upon looking at my pictures taken with this camera, I noticed that they did not have the proper orientation flag set. On my other digital cameras, my landscape and portrait shots have proper orientation flags so that programs like Picasa can auto-rotate. Not so with this camera. Seems like a strange omission from Olympus. diff --git a/SINAI-SA-corpus/2/ref1666_rate2.txt b/SINAI-SA-corpus/2/ref1666_rate2.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..0e9b0211f5d1f4b5529688fcde53aace67cd8ab4 --- /dev/null +++ b/SINAI-SA-corpus/2/ref1666_rate2.txt @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ + Was great until it didn't work anymore, June 22, 2008 + ByS. Lorenzen - See all my reviews +We purchased this for a trip to the Bahamas. It worked fine for about 2 days of mostly land shots. We did try a few underwater shots and got what we expected from a P&S camera. I liked the Scene selection menu for camera settings, it was helpful and improved my ability to take decent shots in a variety of conditions without thinking about settings too much. Solid package, nice controls, would buy again...if I trusted it. We had to buy disposable cameras for the remainder of our trip because in 15 minutes in a 4ft 5in pool (taking photos just below the surface for fun and mostly just using it like I would a water resistant camera, it leaked water into the lens housing. This wasn't enough to fry the electronics...just enough to make the picture all white when taking pictures (foggy is a good descriptor). It also affected the controls because it would zoom in fully automatically each time I turned it on. I was VERY conscientious of checking the seals for debris or defect and ensureing the memory card and battery were fully seated (because I had read reviews saying people had leaks and others saying they weren't careful enough). It still leaked and it did it around the lens housing (there's no user operated seal there, it's just built in). The search for a replacement ensues. diff --git a/SINAI-SA-corpus/2/ref1668_rate2.txt b/SINAI-SA-corpus/2/ref1668_rate2.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..2eeb1962d74cd67a027e5da791caf077d847705c --- /dev/null +++ b/SINAI-SA-corpus/2/ref1668_rate2.txt @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ + Yes, it's waterproof, but very marginal picture quality, September 23, 2008 + ByS. L. Watts "katyroo" (dripping springs texas) - See all my reviews +Well, I wanted this to be the camera that could do it all. I have an old Canon S40 with a UW housing that takes excellent quality pictures - great optics for a point and shoot - but the old Canon is a bit heavy for my shirt pocket and very bulky with the UW housing. Unfortunately, this Olympus 10mp camera takes poorer quality pictures than my old 4mp Canon S40, with or without the UW housing on. Bright sunny day pics turn out acceptably on the Olympus, but any other lighting conditions result in dull, washed out looking, somewhat grainy pictures. Sent it back. diff --git a/SINAI-SA-corpus/2/ref170_rate2.txt b/SINAI-SA-corpus/2/ref170_rate2.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..a398956acd87c30a4c8db761961dbbf6a27aec49 --- /dev/null +++ b/SINAI-SA-corpus/2/ref170_rate2.txt @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ + Not happy, January 6, 2009 + ByHeshy Mandel - See all my reviews +I am a long time fan of Canon. However, I am very disapointed with the A590IS. It takes approx 6 seconds between pictures!! You miss half the "action" just waiting for the camera to recharg after each picture!!?? diff --git a/SINAI-SA-corpus/2/ref171_rate2.txt b/SINAI-SA-corpus/2/ref171_rate2.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..bdaf63bad9e0157890615658d703b510dc303724 --- /dev/null +++ b/SINAI-SA-corpus/2/ref171_rate2.txt @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ + Slow shots, December 28, 2008 + ByKD - See all my reviews +Cute little camera, but has a huge delay between shots. I have kids, so we usually take a few pictures for each shot to make sure we get one good one, but it is impossible to do with this camera. All the reviews said it takes good pictures indoors, but the pictures we got were awful. diff --git a/SINAI-SA-corpus/2/ref1770_rate2.txt b/SINAI-SA-corpus/2/ref1770_rate2.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..bb9ee7249e9e9e1991a3b9b1fa4df9ded14086fa --- /dev/null +++ b/SINAI-SA-corpus/2/ref1770_rate2.txt @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ + Pentax software is not ready for Mac Leopard , January 24, 2008 + ByJoseph Huxford "Chappy man" (Massachusetts) - See all my reviews +Having read all the reviews on the camera, I bought one with the 18-250 Pentax lens. I have been using a Lumix FZ50 and decide to try a DSL and this seemed to be it. Shooting in raw would be an advantage and did not want to spend months learning Adobe. I tried to install the Pentax software on my Mac Leopard with no luck. Pentax is working on the software for the Leopard but no word when it will be ready. It could be months and new model Pentaxs are coming out in less than a month. Frankly, aside from the faster shutter, my Lumix FZ50 had far better results with its stabilizing system. I was disappointed and returned the camera. diff --git a/SINAI-SA-corpus/2/ref201_rate2.txt b/SINAI-SA-corpus/2/ref201_rate2.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..42ba04ed1550d762271865639f49ea3121bc1902 --- /dev/null +++ b/SINAI-SA-corpus/2/ref201_rate2.txt @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ + Sucks battery life in seconds, February 18, 2009 + ByAndrew (California,CA) - See all my reviews +Great camera when it worked. This is my second one and the battery lid that keeps the batteies in has slightly broke and does not keep the batery firm against the metal inside to keep working. The plastic in the battery compartment is very cheap and so is the rest of the cameras housing. Cannon realy went cheap on this one. Even if I hold the the battery door firm and turn on the canera , it still fails and gives me the change batterys. Listen guys and girls, cannon makes better products then this. I have owned the camear for record breaker of 4 months. Im forced to send to canon for another replacement. Trust me when I say, dont buy this camera! Im sorry but its not worth the money. Sad consumer diff --git a/SINAI-SA-corpus/2/ref213_rate2.txt b/SINAI-SA-corpus/2/ref213_rate2.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..c2804a755b1dbbc660b60899545c8cc4542a6bac --- /dev/null +++ b/SINAI-SA-corpus/2/ref213_rate2.txt @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ + Stopped working after 5 weeks of use, February 16, 2009 + ByHot Dot (missouri) - See all my reviews +I bought this camera for my husband to replace his sony 5mp 4 year old camera. He needed a new camera to take on a trip to Korea and other parts of asia. It takes great pictures and video The menue is user friendly BUT........................................... The camera worked fine for the 3 weeks he was abroad. he took some great pictures. After he was home for 1.5 weeks the censor stopped working, just 2 days past Amazons return policy aloud for returns. Now I have to deal with Canons repair center which is a huge hastle. I feel like if the product was only used for 3 weeks that we should get a new camera as a replacement not a repaired defective camera. Make sure you use the heck out of your camera the first few weeks to be sure if something goes wrong you can return it to Amazon and not have to go to Canon. diff --git a/SINAI-SA-corpus/2/ref234_rate2.txt b/SINAI-SA-corpus/2/ref234_rate2.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..feacdd1612fd697b000f704673be89bf252b373f --- /dev/null +++ b/SINAI-SA-corpus/2/ref234_rate2.txt @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ + Too Much Noise, February 12, 2009 + ByBajash (Belleville, NJ USA) - See all my reviews +This camera is easy to use. However, there is too much noise for a decent photo. I am going back to using my 4 megapixal because of this. diff --git a/SINAI-SA-corpus/2/ref268_rate2.txt b/SINAI-SA-corpus/2/ref268_rate2.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..309061f9d5164ed06f9b34ab3a2cd652117f5642 --- /dev/null +++ b/SINAI-SA-corpus/2/ref268_rate2.txt @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ + Canon power shot A590, January 26, 2009 + ByLalitha Padmanabhan "Cape Pad" (Waltham,MA) - See all my reviews +This is my second Cannon digital camera, I bought the previous one(Power shot A70)in the year 2000. When compared to that camera this is not that great. The Cannon Power shot A590 consumes batteries a lot. Also I could not set the date and time on this camera, it would not stay. The only good thing about this camera is its price. diff --git a/SINAI-SA-corpus/2/ref334_rate2.txt b/SINAI-SA-corpus/2/ref334_rate2.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..288e26f86d75e0154bc3378fdb2dcfe30dc1767d --- /dev/null +++ b/SINAI-SA-corpus/2/ref334_rate2.txt @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ + Great idea, not so great results, September 8, 2008 + ByDawn "NJHeart2Heart" (Parsippany, NJ) - See all my reviews +I am a digital SLR user, but since I use a long zoom often, I wanted a simple camera that I could switch to for quick landscapes, instead of switching lenses all the time. I really liked this camera instinctively; the size was small, it had a viewfinder, which is rare on compacts these days and it felt very comfortable to hold. The on/off was excellent, and the initial response was very good. However, after using it heavily for a full week I was dissappointed. Though I didn't do much reading of the manual, I have a digital SLR so wasn't too concerned about working the controls. I knew that the LCD view was not a great resolution, but it became more irritating the more I tried to review photos right after shooting them and as a result, I also did not realize that it's vibration performance was less than stellar. When reviewing my photos after uploading to my PC, When I tried to get to the menu to adjust the review timing (to shorten it), I couldn't find it and it was more difficult to tweek it's performance than I thought, even for a basic adjustment like slight compensation changes. As is all too typical a problem with point and shoots, it had a considerable lag time between photos. The biggest problem, which caused me to return it for a full refund is that the decals on the mode dial RUBBED off by the end of my trip. I'm saddened about this camera, since it seemed to have everything that I needed in a reasonable price. diff --git a/SINAI-SA-corpus/2/ref426_rate2.txt b/SINAI-SA-corpus/2/ref426_rate2.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..25e2ee4a50562aaea0bcc5c9b5c326083b8933a5 --- /dev/null +++ b/SINAI-SA-corpus/2/ref426_rate2.txt @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ + I'm getting rid of this camera., September 16, 2007 + ByTulip_Mesa (Huntsville) - See all my reviews +I went from the Olympus C-5050 (not a point & shoot but not professional either) to the Canon A630. I like to take a lot of natural light pictures and this camera absolutely stinks for this. The flash doesn't produce a lot of light and the natural light pictures are uselessly blurry even when I brace it on something to hold down movement. I've been very unhappy with this camera in every indoor setting, shaded outdoor setting but I have been happy with it outside. I wanted a lighter camera to take fun shots with but even my fun shots like the llama show I went to.. are pretty much useless. I'm going to be getting rid of this camera. I've taken hundreds of pictures on it and it's just making me madder every time. diff --git a/SINAI-SA-corpus/2/ref576_rate2.txt b/SINAI-SA-corpus/2/ref576_rate2.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..9e0d77501800ce8a2dee139e23ea3c3e8424a03d --- /dev/null +++ b/SINAI-SA-corpus/2/ref576_rate2.txt @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ + Redeye, December 11, 2006 + ByMark Twain - See all my reviews +I replaced my Canon A95 with the A630, and I have the worst case of redeye I have ever seen in a camera. The sharpness of the pictures is no different from the A95 nor is the quality of the images any better. I may go back to my A95. diff --git a/SINAI-SA-corpus/2/ref589_rate2.txt b/SINAI-SA-corpus/2/ref589_rate2.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..ad6ccef1ca53edde673ba979b4660ad83328c659 --- /dev/null +++ b/SINAI-SA-corpus/2/ref589_rate2.txt @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ + Not the best--There are better ones, July 10, 2007 + ByD. Campos - See all my reviews +I bought this camera thinking that it would be an upgrade to a 4 y/o Olympus that I had--I was wrong! This model had some very nice features and was easy to learn, but it lacks one important capability and that's (IS) Image Stabilization otherwise known as the ability to adapt for camera shake when taking a picture. I was disappointed by how many blurry images I was getting so much so that I returned it. If you want a compact camera such as this, I'd strongly suggest seeking one of the other Canon models that offers the (IS) feature. diff --git a/SINAI-SA-corpus/2/ref597_rate2.txt b/SINAI-SA-corpus/2/ref597_rate2.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..5d4be96175054daa4d593b165ef78872c398dd82 --- /dev/null +++ b/SINAI-SA-corpus/2/ref597_rate2.txt @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ + Not working well, December 26, 2007 + ByTimothy P. Dwyer - See all my reviews +The camera seemed ok till it broke. The button that adjusts the zoom doesn't function nor does the button you press for photos. We've taken good care of it so we're surprised it doesn't work. We're not sure what to do now. Not sure if the warranty will cover. diff --git a/SINAI-SA-corpus/2/ref605_rate2.txt b/SINAI-SA-corpus/2/ref605_rate2.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..1390cc9dcb84eac1157f8c2303d762a5b8599853 --- /dev/null +++ b/SINAI-SA-corpus/2/ref605_rate2.txt @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ + Canon PS A630 Poor indoor Quality Pictures, March 25, 2007 + ByLinda Egdorf-myron "Linda11454" (Elmont New York) - See all my reviews +I own a Canon G2 4MP camera that takes fantastic pictures indoors and outdoors. It takes fantastic indoor picture without a flash, which at times is a plus because you do not lose anything in the background like you do when you use a flash. I just became a Grandmother and wanted a camera that also takes good video. So I ordered the A630 and I am very disappointed with the quality of the indoor pictures. It takes a fantastic video at the high setting and takes great outdoor pictures. But is poor with indoor pics, very grainy. I tried all different settings to try and see what I am doing wrong, does not matter the indoor pics just stink. I am returning the camera and looking for a better indoor picture quality with the 640 video settings. diff --git a/SINAI-SA-corpus/2/ref609_rate2.txt b/SINAI-SA-corpus/2/ref609_rate2.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..bbfb910c07f429ccacd623406c78ce7d4dfc6336 --- /dev/null +++ b/SINAI-SA-corpus/2/ref609_rate2.txt @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ + Canon Powershot A630 8MP Digital CAmera, September 9, 2007 + ByMaxine Carlson (San Rafael, CA) - See all my reviews +Received the camera quickly. I needed it for a vacation I was taking and it worked well for the first 2 weeks. It did malfunction the last day of my vacation by not opening properly, so only had small slit which was exposed to my shots. Small disappointment, but I hope to rectify this with the warranty or with Amazon. I have always been satisfied in the past with my purchases from Amazon. Canon PowerShot A630 8MP Digital Camera with 4x Optical Zoom diff --git a/SINAI-SA-corpus/2/ref705_rate2.txt b/SINAI-SA-corpus/2/ref705_rate2.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..e69dbd98cf472d85575558d6e129a2e8bae71e8d --- /dev/null +++ b/SINAI-SA-corpus/2/ref705_rate2.txt @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ + The lens error problem is for real...., July 12, 2008 + ByD. Pate (Raleigh, NC United States) - See all my reviews +I got this camera for my daughter (in pink of course) in mid-April. She loves it (size, pictures, etc.) but after less than three months it will only flash "lense error, restart" when it's turned on. Too late to return to Amazon. :( On the bright side, a trip to Canon's website support section got me through to a Repair Request Confirmation. Hopefully, this will just cost me postage to Elk Grove Village, IL. Suspiciously, Canon doesn't list this model on their repair request input screen... makes you wonder if they're trying to discourage the onslaught of these that they're getting back for repair. Here's hoping Canon will stand behind this little jewel. If I had it to do over I'd think twice.... diff --git a/SINAI-SA-corpus/2/ref715_rate2.txt b/SINAI-SA-corpus/2/ref715_rate2.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..e69dbd98cf472d85575558d6e129a2e8bae71e8d --- /dev/null +++ b/SINAI-SA-corpus/2/ref715_rate2.txt @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ + The lens error problem is for real...., July 12, 2008 + ByD. Pate (Raleigh, NC United States) - See all my reviews +I got this camera for my daughter (in pink of course) in mid-April. She loves it (size, pictures, etc.) but after less than three months it will only flash "lense error, restart" when it's turned on. Too late to return to Amazon. :( On the bright side, a trip to Canon's website support section got me through to a Repair Request Confirmation. Hopefully, this will just cost me postage to Elk Grove Village, IL. Suspiciously, Canon doesn't list this model on their repair request input screen... makes you wonder if they're trying to discourage the onslaught of these that they're getting back for repair. Here's hoping Canon will stand behind this little jewel. If I had it to do over I'd think twice.... diff --git a/SINAI-SA-corpus/2/ref725_rate2.txt b/SINAI-SA-corpus/2/ref725_rate2.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..e69dbd98cf472d85575558d6e129a2e8bae71e8d --- /dev/null +++ b/SINAI-SA-corpus/2/ref725_rate2.txt @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ + The lens error problem is for real...., July 12, 2008 + ByD. Pate (Raleigh, NC United States) - See all my reviews +I got this camera for my daughter (in pink of course) in mid-April. She loves it (size, pictures, etc.) but after less than three months it will only flash "lense error, restart" when it's turned on. Too late to return to Amazon. :( On the bright side, a trip to Canon's website support section got me through to a Repair Request Confirmation. Hopefully, this will just cost me postage to Elk Grove Village, IL. Suspiciously, Canon doesn't list this model on their repair request input screen... makes you wonder if they're trying to discourage the onslaught of these that they're getting back for repair. Here's hoping Canon will stand behind this little jewel. If I had it to do over I'd think twice.... diff --git a/SINAI-SA-corpus/2/ref752_rate2.txt b/SINAI-SA-corpus/2/ref752_rate2.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..457daab00853842e6f63ed100ea00cde39860967 --- /dev/null +++ b/SINAI-SA-corpus/2/ref752_rate2.txt @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ + Bad picture, September 18, 2008 + ByT. Lin (Berkeley, CA USA) - See all my reviews +I bought this camera in April. After using it for a while I realized there is always a blue dot in the middle of my images. It becomes more obvious as I zoom in. The blue dot is everywhere: on my photos and on my video. I sent the camera back to Canon Factory in IL for repair and when it came back it still wasn't properly fixed. I just contacted Canon again and see what they will do about my camera. I am not sure if it's only mine camera that has this defect but I hope they would give me a new one if it cannot be repaired. diff --git a/SINAI-SA-corpus/2/ref753_rate2.txt b/SINAI-SA-corpus/2/ref753_rate2.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..f26fda04030a28ae65d582f3be8c0a700f4059a7 --- /dev/null +++ b/SINAI-SA-corpus/2/ref753_rate2.txt @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ + wait a year for quality to come back, August 12, 2008 + Bymusicmonster - See all my reviews +This is the third camera i've purchased over the past few months, guess what? they are all the same camera....each one has died with the lens error message which is quickly determined to be voided by canon 'customer service'. in less than two weeks of very casual and careful use it has barfed again and i'm once again having to pay service shipping for a product that doesn't perform and i know what the cookie cutter response is going to be. These used to be great cameras but obviously parts lately coming from 'who knows where' need a serious boost in QA to fix this lens error problem, but thats for the next sap, i'm done with canon diff --git a/SINAI-SA-corpus/2/ref785_rate2.txt b/SINAI-SA-corpus/2/ref785_rate2.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..1eec1a19e3e38d2dcab664d2106d17dac3c2acfa --- /dev/null +++ b/SINAI-SA-corpus/2/ref785_rate2.txt @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ + It broke., January 7, 2009 + ByDuke A. Jones - See all my reviews +This camera takes good pictures, has a decent interface, and looks nice. But there's one major problem. After nearly a month of use, the camera turns on, reads "Lens Error", and the lens will not retract when turned off. Apparently this is an ongoing problem, it makes the camera completely unusable, and Canon does not admit that it's a problem. I have yet to try returning it. Wish me luck. diff --git a/SINAI-SA-corpus/2/ref787_rate2.txt b/SINAI-SA-corpus/2/ref787_rate2.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..0a4f91f2cfca311f8bfcdf04bd9309b95ef77bb7 --- /dev/null +++ b/SINAI-SA-corpus/2/ref787_rate2.txt @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ + Image Sensor Stopped Functioning after 2 Months, January 4, 2009 + BySea Squared (Sutton, MA) - See all my reviews +I bought the Canon Powershot SD1100 IS to replace a larger Minolta Dimage camera that I sometimes did not carry on short trips because of its size and weight. I used the Powershot for 2 months and was very happy with the results until one day just before Christmas I powered it up and the image sensor failed to transmit a picture. The camera had NEVER been dropped or roughly handled. I phoned Canon technical support and learned that spontaneous sensor failure is a common problem with this camera. And while the camera is under warranty so repair & return shipping will be free, I still had to pack up the camera and personally pay to ship it to their Powershot repair facility in Illinois. In my opinion, spontaneous failure of a critical camera system is unacceptable, and the fact that Canon knows about this problem and still requires customers to pay to ship their cameras for warranty repair is irresponsible. I would not recommend buying the Powershot SD 1100, and I certainly won't be doing business with Canon again. diff --git a/SINAI-SA-corpus/2/ref801_rate2.txt b/SINAI-SA-corpus/2/ref801_rate2.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..a051feedf6fe27ffcf9278b947c5132f34836b02 --- /dev/null +++ b/SINAI-SA-corpus/2/ref801_rate2.txt @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ + Worse than the PowerShot 5MP?, December 13, 2008 + ByKickin' in PDX (Portland, OR) - See all my reviews +We had a PowerShot 5MP previously and liked it well enough. This model was disappointing. Pictures in ideal lighting situations are fine, but otherwise can be less than crisp. Given the popularity of this model is it's strong rankings, somewhat wondering whether we got a lemon. Anyway, we returned it. diff --git a/SINAI-SA-corpus/3/ref1051_rate3.txt b/SINAI-SA-corpus/3/ref1051_rate3.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..6e1b5e7ddfafdeb99b905a60505b6fec14a1bf95 --- /dev/null +++ b/SINAI-SA-corpus/3/ref1051_rate3.txt @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ + Over-rated Canon SD1100IS, May 15, 2008 + ByE. Epstein (Ft Lauderdale) - See all my reviews +Just bought the SD1100IS to replace a 1-1/2 year old Casio Exilim EX-Z850 that I broke. I checked out all of the reviews for this new Canon model and was impressed with the comments. But after receiving the camera and using it for a few weeks I am beginning to have my doubts. In fact, right now I would happily give it back to have my Casio Exilim back! 1. Slow, slow, slow - the setup time for every shot, particularly indoor shots, is really annoying. My Casio was ready in about half the time. 2. Grainy images on screen for any nightime indoor shots. 3. Severely under-powered flash - I thought I read some reviews that gave it an OK rating at 10 feet...try about 8 feet and you might be more accurate. Many flash shots were severely darkened by lack of light...and often the flash only covered a portion of the image leaving faces dark and everything else in the photo bright. 4. Used it last weekend for a wedding - roughly half of the shots had to be thrown away...you don't get a lot of opportunities at a wedding. Things move along at their own pace. So walking down the aisle, every other shot was blurry, or out of focus. 5. Face Recognition software worked sometimes, and other times drove me crazy as it would not lock in anywhere near the faces....I eventually shut it off. 6. The pictures - well yes it does take nice pictures...if you're willing to put up with a very annoying camera. Maybe I'll get more used to it over time. I just can't afford to have so many bad shots among the good ones. diff --git a/SINAI-SA-corpus/3/ref1061_rate3.txt b/SINAI-SA-corpus/3/ref1061_rate3.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..e36d645ba42c248fdaaafabfa7d7e6479cea30be --- /dev/null +++ b/SINAI-SA-corpus/3/ref1061_rate3.txt @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ + So far, so good..., December 12, 2008 + ByAMM - See all my reviews +We have been using this camera for a few weeks. Pros: Picture quality is excellent. Small (fits in a pocket). Easy to use. Cons: Slippery: There is a small cord that you can attach to the camera. Make sure you use it. This camera is really slippery and will fall off you hand easily. The lens is not well protected -- must take extra care when placing the camera in a bag. diff --git a/SINAI-SA-corpus/3/ref1090_rate3.txt b/SINAI-SA-corpus/3/ref1090_rate3.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..c3caa828a627177f73176bcde145938154317b95 --- /dev/null +++ b/SINAI-SA-corpus/3/ref1090_rate3.txt @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ + Canon SD1100is Review, June 2, 2008 + ByTakashi Arimura "Tosh" (Fairfax, VA) - See all my reviews +Great point and shoot camera for the money. Unlike some other camera of it's class, it has nice metal housing instead of plastic. So it feel nice an steady in your hands. diff --git a/SINAI-SA-corpus/3/ref1091_rate3.txt b/SINAI-SA-corpus/3/ref1091_rate3.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..b35f52e1f529ff0ae087130a6775c14eae9e75dc --- /dev/null +++ b/SINAI-SA-corpus/3/ref1091_rate3.txt @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ + Okay, but pretty good for the money, June 13, 2008 + ByNicole "Nicole" - See all my reviews +I just got this camera today, and although I kinda like it, I am really disappointed at some of the picture quality. Keep in mind, though, that I was taking the pictures of myself so my hand was a little shaky. Also, when i tried to use the color swap it didn't work all that great and was confusing...there is a better canon camera for only about $50 more that I wish I had gotten. My older sister got it instead... diff --git a/SINAI-SA-corpus/3/ref1092_rate3.txt b/SINAI-SA-corpus/3/ref1092_rate3.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..e1ac9105015cce85febe0fe8fadaee1c16e01cdc --- /dev/null +++ b/SINAI-SA-corpus/3/ref1092_rate3.txt @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ + Blue, October 15, 2008 + ByA. Wolkes-Munster "A. WM" (Burbank, CA) - See all my reviews +The Canon PowerShot SD1100IS 8MP Digital Camera with 3x Optical Image Stabilized Zoom I ordered through Amazon.com is blue. Very blue indeed. Not robin's egg blue nor Robocop blue - but a blessed intersection of the two that's a touch more Robo than egg. diff --git a/SINAI-SA-corpus/3/ref1093_rate3.txt b/SINAI-SA-corpus/3/ref1093_rate3.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..44302859643447c8fc282bf4c017c3403a13c867 --- /dev/null +++ b/SINAI-SA-corpus/3/ref1093_rate3.txt @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ + Still New, April 2, 2008 + ByKellyandPeanut (NC) - See all my reviews +I've only had it 3 days but the menu is much more advanced than the 2 year old nikon coolpix and fuji I just got rid of. So much so I'll have to read the manual, and I hate that. But it still wont take night shots on the night setting, which after going on 2 ghost tours with the other 2 and my 12 year old canon 35 mm nothing shows up. I always had problems with night shots, batteries, and shutter speed. The reputation and charging ability was the main reason I picked this. The choice of colors were nice, I wanted blue or gold but only Best buy and Wolf carried old boring silver or pink so I ordered from J & R online. Dont look for it at Walmart, Sears, Target, they don't have it yet. It is the smallest digital camera I've had or seen in a long time, about the same size as my Razor cell phone. diff --git a/SINAI-SA-corpus/3/ref1117_rate3.txt b/SINAI-SA-corpus/3/ref1117_rate3.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..8bfa1d96acb758a600d26cd9f322c6554f9d8a53 --- /dev/null +++ b/SINAI-SA-corpus/3/ref1117_rate3.txt @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ + Good Camera - Lousy Software, December 21, 2008 + ByElbert L. Martin Jr. (Indian Harbour Bch., FL USA) - See all my reviews +Perfect little camera for the money. Good pics except for low light group shots. The flash isn't designed for that, just closer up shots. My wife uses for real estate and likes it. Video is not bad either with a large SD card. Don't even think about installing the software!! It installed on one computer but failed on the other half way through. I could not remove it and the Canon WEB site is no help at all. You can use the Microsoft downloader just fine to download pics and video. Again, don't install the software!! diff --git a/SINAI-SA-corpus/3/ref1135_rate3.txt b/SINAI-SA-corpus/3/ref1135_rate3.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..0348e9fa622af76fb491c6eb1f14367bf5e12de5 --- /dev/null +++ b/SINAI-SA-corpus/3/ref1135_rate3.txt @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ + Almost but not quite. . ., September 4, 2004 + ByEpisteme - See all my reviews +I liked a lot of things about this camera--it was easy to figure out--a real plus for a relative novice--, it had good response time on the shutter, quality of pictures was good, and I was able to adjust it for a variety of conditions. However, it did have a tendency to overexpose shots, especially in full sun outdoors, or when using the flash indoors. Now, this can be adjusted for--you can go into the "exposure" option on the menu and take down the exposure a bit, and that worked well. I even found that if I underexposed pictures a bit, and then brightened them up when I got them on my computer, I often got better color and detail than the default exposure settings. So I almost kept it. But the fatal flaw for me was that, having taken the trouble to get all the menu settings where I wanted them--if I changed the dial setting, or shut the camera off, they were gone. The settings all reverted automatically to the default, so I'd have to do it all over again ten minutes later to get the next shot. It was a near thing--but I returned the camera. However, for anyone who isn't quite the control freak I am, this is a good camera at a good price. I was worried about battery life, but I took well over 100 shots before the digital AA batteries that came with it wore out. I tossed in a pair of rechargeable AAs, and took maybe 150 more, and they hadn't run down when I decided to return it. Of course, I don't use the LCD as my viewfinder, which helps extend battery life a lot. On the other hand, I did spend quite a lot of time reviewing pictures on the LCD, and even took some videos just for fun, so considering how Consumer Reports rated Kodak cameras on battery relative to other digital cameras, I was quite pleased. diff --git a/SINAI-SA-corpus/3/ref1143_rate3.txt b/SINAI-SA-corpus/3/ref1143_rate3.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..c39ac2093553411ffd55ac5da184d2efa8d0d0b8 --- /dev/null +++ b/SINAI-SA-corpus/3/ref1143_rate3.txt @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ + Pictures are a mixed bag, but still a good buy, August 4, 2004 + ByReed (Sammamish, WA) - See all my reviews +Pros: - Great price for an outstanding 4MP resolution - Small and light - Easy-to-use menus; lots of dedicated function buttons - Video with sound that's worth keeping! - Portraits generally look outstanding Cons: - Can't remember your flash setting after turning off camera - Images generally overexposed - Trouble taking pictures when zoomed in This is a great camera for the price, yet images can turn out anywhere from outstanding to poor. Portraits usually look great, with soft, smooth skin tones. But most images, taken with or without the flash, are highly overexposed. And when zoomed in (using the optical zoom, not digital), all the pictures turn out blurry. This happens even in well-lit conditions and when I am holding the camera still. If you are not terribly concerned about the quality of your pictures, this is an excellent camera. But since I've found that my old 2MP Fuji camera takes better (if grainier) pictures, I'm not likely to shop at Kodak again. diff --git a/SINAI-SA-corpus/3/ref1145_rate3.txt b/SINAI-SA-corpus/3/ref1145_rate3.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..254a8429895a1e70ae48924c3948711d1125d367 --- /dev/null +++ b/SINAI-SA-corpus/3/ref1145_rate3.txt @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ + Excellent Investment, August 31, 2004 + ByButterscotch (USA) - See all my reviews +I've had my CX7430 for over 2 years now and have enjoyed this camera thoroughly. The camera has great zoom capabilities and can get you close to the subject you want to photograph. The battery life is very decent, even when the LCD display is being used. The pictures themselves (when left on Auto mode) are super - the colors and clarity are excellent. I've received very positive feedback about the clarity of the pictures. The memory cards are inexpensive too, especially if you don't buy the Kodak brand of SD cards. The camera is preloaded for only 10 pictures and comes with a nonrechargable battery set, so investing in memory and batteries is a must. My favorite feature is the video capabilities; with my 1GB card (and the camera will accept up to a 2GB card) I can get close to 70 minutes of video, with wonderful audio. The video is recorded in .mov files and are quite impressive. The downsides? Sure, there are a few.. the camera is quite bulky in comparison to almost all other digi cams currently available - it's quite `fat' in size, and the casing is very easily scratched, even with gentle use and care; and night shots taken outside (like fireworks or holiday lights) are pretty terrible - blurry and unusable. Overall I am very impressed with the quality and features of this camera and won't be replacing it for quite some time. The 4MP are more than enough for quality photos, the video is a wonderful bonus and the ease of use is wonderful. Highly recommended. diff --git a/SINAI-SA-corpus/3/ref1152_rate3.txt b/SINAI-SA-corpus/3/ref1152_rate3.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..c9898d5518a4ccd6873551c34c1abce79b214aaf --- /dev/null +++ b/SINAI-SA-corpus/3/ref1152_rate3.txt @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ + Great speed, poor picture quality, September 5, 2005 + ByMichelle (Madison, WI) - See all my reviews +I bought this camera while on vacation to replace my 3.2 megapixel Canon PowerShot A70. Since then I've taken a few hundred pictures and just don't like the picture quality as much as the camera it replaced. The pixel count is higher but the overall image quality seems worse. The auto focus almost always tends to blur just a little, even when the camera is balanced on a stable surface. I just finished editing pictures I took in Paris and became more and more disappointed at the quality the more I examined the photos for focus and contrast. The one pro I've identified is that the Kodak does take pictures quickly and doesn't have the annoying lag that plagued my Canon. If you are buying this to replace a Canon make sure you're satisfied with the image quality differences before purchasing. diff --git a/SINAI-SA-corpus/3/ref1155_rate3.txt b/SINAI-SA-corpus/3/ref1155_rate3.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..0abaecbf9783fb1005d2e60c852a182f32f1f1ae --- /dev/null +++ b/SINAI-SA-corpus/3/ref1155_rate3.txt @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ + Good camera, bad support, May 8, 2005 + ByJohn J Ewan (Missoula, MT USA) - See all my reviews +As cameras go, this one is easy to use and takes great pictures. It has some really nice features too. But digital cameras are more than just stand-alone devices; you have to connect them to something else to get the pictures off. That's where I ran into trouble. It seems the "Easyshare" software on the CD with the camera is incompatible with Windows 2000 or XP if they are fully updated. They suggest that you download new software from their website instead, but to do that you must register, and their website refused to let me do that. So to share pictures on a camera with "EasyShare" in its NAME, I had to eventually go to Microsoft's support site to learn how to uninstall the Windows update that was interfering with Kodak's software. Now I have to worry about Windows re-installing that update next time I run Windows Update. Does this seem "Easy" to you? In short, do not buy this camera unless you have good computer skills and time to spend. Shame on Kodak for so blatantly dropping the ball. diff --git a/SINAI-SA-corpus/3/ref1188_rate3.txt b/SINAI-SA-corpus/3/ref1188_rate3.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..2e406017e557bed4c777d44558d5d7628912408b --- /dev/null +++ b/SINAI-SA-corpus/3/ref1188_rate3.txt @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ + understand flash, June 4, 2004 + By A Customer +At least one of the problems described by the commentator above may be due to user error. I am regularly amazed by people who try to use a flash to capture people on stage 50 feet away (or even use flash to attempt to take a picture of a projected film on a screen). The tiny flashes on ALL portable cameras only work up to about 15 feet away (and if they are close enough to a film screen they'll just wipe it out with white light).So, we shouldn't be surprised that your flash pictures of your cousin turned out dark -- the flash didn't reach him. And, we shouldn't be surrpised that it was blurry -- when zoomed in, in low light, any autofocus will have trouble tracking and the CCD will barely get enough light to register anything.(I don't have this particular camera so just gave it a middling rating out of ignorance.) diff --git a/SINAI-SA-corpus/3/ref1194_rate3.txt b/SINAI-SA-corpus/3/ref1194_rate3.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..5061a5aa916485c2aa1902dd5515a23e840ad995 --- /dev/null +++ b/SINAI-SA-corpus/3/ref1194_rate3.txt @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ + so-so printed pictures, October 8, 2007 + ByK. Nguyen - See all my reviews +I want to give this 3 1/2 stars, but it's not possible so I'm giving it 3 stars. Bought the Kodak EasyShare V1003 in July for my mom. She's never had a digital camera before so I was looking for something easy to use, not too many complicated buttons. The camera was easy for her to learn how to use. The problem came when we printed out some pictures. The quality of the printed pictures was iffy. Some shots were stunning, great color, unbelievable detail. Others looked much worse than they did on the camera's LCD screen and the computer screen. I noticed that bad shots occured most often when we took pictures of people inside. Faces were not very detailed, and everything came out much darker than it looked on the camera's and computer's screens. I played around with the camera a lot over the past week, taking lots of test shots in different settings, and I've come to the conclusion that the camera has problems with taking photos of groups of people (bad facial detailing) in indoor situations from more than five feet away. If you stand pretty close to someone, the camera usually does ok (flash can sometimes be too powerful, washing out details and colors) but faces are blurry when you stand further away compared to the output of other digital cameras (my relatives have Canon and Sony cameras). The pictures are ok, certainly comparable in quality to our old 35mm film camera from the 90s. It's just that other modern digital cameras can capture much finer detail of faces in in-door situations than this Kodak. I've learned the hard way that megapixels aren't everything, camera lens and in-camera processing matters alot too. I've just ordered a 7 megapixel Canon model for my mother. My sister has this Canon and the print output from her camera is fantastic compared to what we've gotten from this Kodak. Shop around, higher megapixels don't translate into better details in photos. diff --git a/SINAI-SA-corpus/3/ref1198_rate3.txt b/SINAI-SA-corpus/3/ref1198_rate3.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..8bfdf58fa1e18a7f96f477a666f6ef069f4b132d --- /dev/null +++ b/SINAI-SA-corpus/3/ref1198_rate3.txt @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ + Lots of MP for cheaper, you get what you pay for., February 10, 2008 + ByJ. Taihei "happy_happy" - See all my reviews +I'm torn about this camera. On the one hand, it has really nice picture quality: really brilliant colors with enough light and lots of MPs for the price. Then again pictures tend to run a bit blurry at times and the response time button-to-capture lags a bit. Overall I'm really happy with the pictures. This camera is a nice fit for what I need: I don't take photos often, and when I do I like doing artsy quiet shots. If you're more on-the-go and need higher performance, go with a CANON. AUDIO CLICKING ON VIDEO FEATURE: Videos will have a clicking noise in the audio. It wasn't until I read another Amazon review that I discovered this happens because of the Auto Focus feature. Thankfully it's stopped since I've turned the feature off. Absolutely annoying design flaw. diff --git a/SINAI-SA-corpus/3/ref1206_rate3.txt b/SINAI-SA-corpus/3/ref1206_rate3.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..20f0d6bd2b254c4c5f223d648107fff5089bb7dc --- /dev/null +++ b/SINAI-SA-corpus/3/ref1206_rate3.txt @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ + Product Review, June 1, 2008 + ByWilliam T. Laffond - See all my reviews +The camera is compact, fairly light and easy to use, and takes high quality photos. I think the camera is a good value. Negatives: doesn't dock to an older Easy Share version I had; the software takes longer to start than older version; I miss having a viewfinder, this camera just has a view screen; battery cover slips open fairly easily if you hold it with a pincer grip; camera body fairly slippery, could use some coarse grip surfaces. Overall satisfied, but things I would change, and wish I had considered beforehand. diff --git a/SINAI-SA-corpus/3/ref1208_rate3.txt b/SINAI-SA-corpus/3/ref1208_rate3.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..698becbd4c79677638551b874b9ef41eaf730858 --- /dev/null +++ b/SINAI-SA-corpus/3/ref1208_rate3.txt @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ + Pictures too dark, December 1, 2007 + ByKimberly Howells - See all my reviews +I bought the Kodak V1003 in late August 2007 at Target...I find I am constantly using the PERFECT TOUCH technology feature in the camera to brighten up the picture... I primarily take pictures of people....I personally like brighter pictures than this camera takes...Although I love all the user- friendly features and durability (dropped it on hard concrete...no damage!) of this Kodak camera ...I decided to buy the Canon Powershot SD 750 Elph camera last week from amazon and so far I am much happier with the brightness of this Canon camera's pictures! diff --git a/SINAI-SA-corpus/3/ref1223_rate3.txt b/SINAI-SA-corpus/3/ref1223_rate3.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..6302795666318e62ad9019c322a4e057814bbbe1 --- /dev/null +++ b/SINAI-SA-corpus/3/ref1223_rate3.txt @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ + Come as promised but Not satisfy with picture quality, January 12, 2008 + ByXeng Yang - See all my reviews +Great Price and come as promised but the camera just turned me away. I guess I better sticked with Asian Technology better. Picture quality even with 10MP still not crystal clear shot, and takes too long to get picture reviewed. diff --git a/SINAI-SA-corpus/3/ref1226_rate3.txt b/SINAI-SA-corpus/3/ref1226_rate3.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..741ed9ddf9600f5f7e615bed2ff87d875654c293 --- /dev/null +++ b/SINAI-SA-corpus/3/ref1226_rate3.txt @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ + Good pictures, Way to slow!, August 29, 2007 + ByGregory K. Brown "G. Brown" (Utah) - See all my reviews +We took this camera to Disneyland. It was very slow booting up. Once it was on, and you were able to snap a shot it would take a very long time to process the image. This delay caused us to miss a lot of good shots. We took it back. diff --git a/SINAI-SA-corpus/3/ref1231_rate3.txt b/SINAI-SA-corpus/3/ref1231_rate3.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..076a84ab97f0cd5e290c84c87c2d6b6972010599 --- /dev/null +++ b/SINAI-SA-corpus/3/ref1231_rate3.txt @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ + a bit hit and miss, really., December 6, 2008 + ByCarly Campbell (Ludington, Michigan, USA) - See all my reviews +I did a bit of research on this camera before making the decision to buy it. Apparently I just didn't do enough. At 10mp, the quality is disappointing. I've had cameras that were perhaps 4mp and yet they still took sharper, clearer photos. As much as I play with the settings, and no matter how steady the photo is or how careful I am in paying attention to the lighting, I still find it falling behind my first Kodak from 1998. This is not a good thing, in the least. It is also very fragile! I had to send in my first one for a broken lens when it slipped out of my hand and hit the table, even though I had the wrist strap on and the fall was perhaps a few inches. On the bright side, it is extremely easy to navigate, and focuses very well, even if the quality isn't as wonderful as I had been hoping. All in all, it is a fairly good camera for its price, and beats out most other digitals in its price range. However, I think I'll do a bit more review reading the next time I buy a camera -- and probably go crawling back to Nikon for the quality/durability combo I desire. diff --git a/SINAI-SA-corpus/3/ref1233_rate3.txt b/SINAI-SA-corpus/3/ref1233_rate3.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..eb3dfef9ffb85a6e6df33f086a68ce2237dba731 --- /dev/null +++ b/SINAI-SA-corpus/3/ref1233_rate3.txt @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ + why the picture comes with too much light or black in the low light spots, November 19, 2008 + ByM. Patel "mp" (atlanta, GA) - See all my reviews +i bought this camera a month before. i don't get why the picture comes so dark in the low light places. sometimes it comes completely dark in those cases. i am tired of it because i can't take any decent picture in the clubs or at night. does anyone have any suggestion about it. i played with manual but nothing seems to work. please help me if someone know about it. diff --git a/SINAI-SA-corpus/3/ref1234_rate3.txt b/SINAI-SA-corpus/3/ref1234_rate3.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..bff5fcbb81bb0524f3b29265d3b16c6cadb6f816 --- /dev/null +++ b/SINAI-SA-corpus/3/ref1234_rate3.txt @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ + third times the charm??, October 30, 2008 + ByKelcey_Bea - See all my reviews +I bought this camera while i was pregnant because i figured i would need a good one for when the baby came. I was really pleased with it and it did take really nice photos. The videos werent the best but i suppose you cant expect perfect videos from a cheap camera. When the baby came i had someone running around the delivery room snapping pictures. Every other picture was blurry. I dont know if it was the operator or just the camera. I did notice that you had to wait a long time and have the perfect light for the camera to take really good pics. After having the camera for about 2 or 3 months i had an accident involving dirty baby clothes a misplaced camera and a washing machine...needles to say the camera didnt make it out alive. I decided to go ahead and buy the same camera agian. I was still pleased with it but a little bummed i couldnt find the 10mp for as cheap so instead i had to settle for the 8.2. Anyways im an avid review reader and i had read a couple that said the camera straight up quit working after 6 months. I decided to ignore them because most of the other comments were totally positive. I had my second camera for about 5 months and it died...on its own...no washing machine involved. It was like the Auto Focus just completely quit working for some reason. (really bad timing too because i was at the hospital with my friend while she was having HER baby when i found out it quit working.) Anyway i liked the camera but cant decide if i want to try it out a third time and risk the chance of getting burned. diff --git a/SINAI-SA-corpus/3/ref1244_rate3.txt b/SINAI-SA-corpus/3/ref1244_rate3.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..6e05885c4011b2f541c2620553f1e0850bd73221 --- /dev/null +++ b/SINAI-SA-corpus/3/ref1244_rate3.txt @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ + You get what you pay for, July 13, 2008 + ByTinkerbell - See all my reviews +I bought this camera because I thought it's a great value. I paid $170 a year ago, hard to beat the price considering this is a 10 mp camera. I've given it 3 starts because I do like the quality of the pictures. It's sharp enough for me, I'm not a professional photographer or anything, but I've been taking daily pictures of my baby since she was born and the results have been pretty good with this camera. As far as recording videos,......This camera is terrible. The quality is awful, very grainy and once you transfer the videos to your computer, it's almost impossible to hear the sound. I don't know if I'm doing something wrong - like another reviewer said, the manual is no help whatsoever, you have to figure it all out by trail and error . My brother has recently bought the exact same camera, but 8 mp instead of 10, and much to my surprise his videos have a much better quality than mine. I can't figure out why. diff --git a/SINAI-SA-corpus/3/ref1246_rate3.txt b/SINAI-SA-corpus/3/ref1246_rate3.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..025b8e424830e9e0aee41645a7b3364ef6fa374c --- /dev/null +++ b/SINAI-SA-corpus/3/ref1246_rate3.txt @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ + A beautiful mediocrity, July 7, 2008 + ByR. Trevino "hd dvd aficionado" (Tx) - See all my reviews +First off, let me just say that I'm a Canon believer. The only reason I have this camera is because I got it at work as a prize. I've owned a Canon A40 (2MP) and a Canon A80 (4MP). I've never been too big a fan of Kodak's build quality (cheap plastic on many lower end models) and have always been skeptical about their image quality. The good thing about this camera is that it feels solidly built. I can't really attest to it's durability, as I've never been unfortunate enough to have dropped it. Kudos to Kodak for the appearance of the camera - it's a good size, has a solid weight, and the screen looks really nice. The buttons are small and difficult to distinguish but functional enough. The menu isn't as intuitive as what I've used on my Canon's, acceptable, but not great. The real weakness of this camera lies in it's picture quality. Since my A80 is only 4MP, I figured that this would be a nice upgrade for me, regardless of my preference to Canon's design and interface. I only recently had a real chance to use the camera and it was then that I learned that it's image quality was not adequate for me. I was visiting Sea World, and I took my A80 and the v1003. We were taking pictures with both cameras of the same shows and after I got home, I began comparing the shots in iPhoto. I was disappointed by the amount of noise/grain in the v1003's shots. My Canon shots were generally brighter and certainly not plagued with noise. Even some outdoor shots in bright daylight couldn't match up to those of the Canon. The shutter response was slow, despite prepping for the shot, there was too much lag. Most of the action shots were caught with the Canon. Even more disappointing was the video quality. This camera records at 640x480, much better than my Canon's 320x240, but the compression is horrible. I like that I was able to zoom in and out as I recorded (a feature that my A80 lacks) but I was completely unimpressed after seeing the videos on my computer. Certainly this camera is priced cheaper than what I have paid for either of my Canon's when they were available, but the quality is still inexcusable. I won't say that the camera is completely worthless, but even at Amazon's price, it is a hard sell if you are even remotely serious about the quality of your photos. This is a good camera for "fun" occasions and may be enough for a school student to take pictures of their friends. I wouldn't count on it for a major event or a family trip. The v1003 failed to take the roll of my A80 and since then I decided to purchase a Canon SD870. diff --git a/SINAI-SA-corpus/3/ref1248_rate3.txt b/SINAI-SA-corpus/3/ref1248_rate3.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..0e8bd1ab515c1236548acb7ec7ad4aaac34b934f --- /dev/null +++ b/SINAI-SA-corpus/3/ref1248_rate3.txt @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ + Outdoor not indoor, July 6, 2008 + ByL. Sturgis "petey116" (Chico, Ca) - See all my reviews +I bought this camera last October. I have been very disappointed with it. It takes great outdoor pictures but for indoor pictures it is a crap shoot. They might look good on the screen but once downloaded too often they are blurry or grainy. The flash can be harsh on the eyes when used, especially with kids and in my opinion make the picture too bright. And not using the flash the pics are worse than ever. I am tired of getting cameras that take great outdoor pics and HORRIBLE indoor pictures. Course I have just been sticking to Kodak easyshare cameras so might be time to change brands. diff --git a/SINAI-SA-corpus/3/ref1277_rate3.txt b/SINAI-SA-corpus/3/ref1277_rate3.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..8b83c30af3ecc256c24fb4cb2ae1df4484a44664 --- /dev/null +++ b/SINAI-SA-corpus/3/ref1277_rate3.txt @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ + Not Too Impressed - but worth $100.00, June 6, 2008 + ByFrank M. (Los Angeles, CA) - See all my reviews +I bought this camera on sale at Target for $100 and glad I did! This camera is basic, works fine, takes good pictures, and thats about it. I would compare the quality of picture to more of an 7megapixel, not 10. I've taken better looking pictures with an 8megapixel Olympus ($150) camera. The video is bad. Very low resolution that cant be raised and there is purple tint and vertical lines while recording. I'd recommend this camera for the low price of $100 or less, and to first time buyers. But if you got the money, definitely spring for a better camera with more features. Canon camera's seem to be what everyone recommends. Casio has great features. diff --git a/SINAI-SA-corpus/3/ref1302_rate3.txt b/SINAI-SA-corpus/3/ref1302_rate3.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..e8582855d17a07a42151d3aa5a2800c18fb151fd --- /dev/null +++ b/SINAI-SA-corpus/3/ref1302_rate3.txt @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ + It is Okay, November 11, 2005 + ByHerzog "nikulo" (United States) - See all my reviews +This camera is for absolute beginners and people who want complete ease of use with no special preferences. If you do anything with graphic design, stay away from this camera! Their software is invasive and does not cooperate. I had to download patch and still it did not work. Kodak customer service is one of the worst. For this reason I would not recommend this camera. Camera shoots good pictures, no problem there. Of course any big zoom takes a lot of battery power. Lithium charger cost more money. I think it is better to spend a little more and get Canon with 10X zoom. I would not go with Sony, because their larger screens take more power and it is all about power conservation with digital cs. diff --git a/SINAI-SA-corpus/3/ref1309_rate3.txt b/SINAI-SA-corpus/3/ref1309_rate3.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..2f6daa8010b6ab1b758cd316dadb807b938fbc1b --- /dev/null +++ b/SINAI-SA-corpus/3/ref1309_rate3.txt @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ + Okay For the Money, January 10, 2007 + ByDecaf Photo (Seattle, WA) - See all my reviews +I purchased this camera before I became a professional photographer, and for someone who is 1, inexperienced and 2, on a budget, it works good. Not great, good. First of all, I live in Washington. I bought the camera during the summer and I took all these beautiful shots because there was great sunlight. However once the overcast fall and winter started setting in I realized a major drawback, in low light the quality of photos drops off dramatically. Also, it's somewhat brittle. It took an approximately one foot drop when I was in tacoma and the LCD broke, manual settings no longer functioned and I've had a lot of trouble with the lens. So in conclusion, if you are an inexperienced photographer, this is easy enough for you to pick up and take some pretty good pictures. If you live in a cloudy area, you'll have to use flash and it doesn't pick up skin tones well at all when you use it. I also wouldn't recommend it for a kid because one drop and look what happens. It has the basic manual settings if you're a slightly more advanced user, but with so many auto only settings if you know what you're doing at all, you'll probably be frustrated. You get what you pay for. diff --git a/SINAI-SA-corpus/3/ref1342_rate3.txt b/SINAI-SA-corpus/3/ref1342_rate3.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..2a76973d315928247ae31b6b5cefae0f346e9b86 --- /dev/null +++ b/SINAI-SA-corpus/3/ref1342_rate3.txt @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ + Still a work in progress, August 7, 2006 + ByTimothy J. Phillips (Lombard, IL USA) - See all my reviews +So far, I am very happy with the quality of the photos, but I haven't really had much of a chance to use the zoom. I'm still trying to get used to all of the different settings. One thing drives me crazy and that's the lens cap! It will not stay on, no matter what I have tried. But I can't say I wasn't warned, one of the othere reviewers had the same problem. diff --git a/SINAI-SA-corpus/3/ref1343_rate3.txt b/SINAI-SA-corpus/3/ref1343_rate3.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..7185d9d491452b1c59665100b46ea61122b22e61 --- /dev/null +++ b/SINAI-SA-corpus/3/ref1343_rate3.txt @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ + ok so, June 24, 2006 + A Kid's Review +this camera is okay. it has reallllyyyyyy good zoom, but some of the pictures, the background is just black. and if you use the "capture subject and background" it almost always comes out blurry. maybe mines just messed up. but yeah so hopefully im getting a new camera. but still keeping this one for traveling and stuff. because the landscape feature is excellent. i wouldnt suggest this camera for every day use. but its pretty good. BREAKS EASILY IF DROPPED. dropped mine the first day i got it. it broke, but i was sent a new one for free. i've used the neckstrap ever since. diff --git a/SINAI-SA-corpus/3/ref1353_rate3.txt b/SINAI-SA-corpus/3/ref1353_rate3.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..01408586bdfbb637ae3cab49fd72af191da1339e --- /dev/null +++ b/SINAI-SA-corpus/3/ref1353_rate3.txt @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ + Bad decision, January 3, 2006 + ByShutter Bug "SB" (Kansas City, MO USA) - See all my reviews +I have had numerous digital cameras. I almost always go for a Canon, but Canon stopped making it's 5mp with 10x zoom. I read about the Kodak Z740 online and decided to buy it. I bought it on sale for $299 at OfficeMax. It was the worst decision I have ever made. It can not even come close to my Canon that only has 4mp and 5x zoom. Using zoom, you can not even tell what the picture is. The flash is HORRIBLE. Any photos I took with the flash turned out a blue color. The only decent photos shot with this camera were outside in bright sunlight with the flash off. Do not even try to look at the sample photos from users for this camera. There is NO WAY any of those are possible with the camera I bought. I will never buy another Kodak. The people at OfficeMax were very nice about it, though. diff --git a/SINAI-SA-corpus/3/ref1377_rate3.txt b/SINAI-SA-corpus/3/ref1377_rate3.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..cde49540f6e8b61fa979944e995e956428fb6c32 --- /dev/null +++ b/SINAI-SA-corpus/3/ref1377_rate3.txt @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ + there's one con that really makes me unhappy, November 25, 2005 + ByN. Broodie - See all my reviews +the one thing i really do not like is that you cannot zoom while filming video. this makes no sense to me as i would want to focus in on different things while filming. i understand that i'm buying it more for pictures but at 300 dollars i would at least expect to take video clips on trips. updated 11-30-05 i replaced the camera with a canon S2 powershot and i would definitely recommend the canon over the kodak. the S2 has 12x optical zoom, 5MP, and takes beautiful video that allows you to zoom. the few indoor pictures i took with the kodak do not compare with canon's indoor shots. canon's shots look much cleaner, brighter, and sharper than my kodak shots (in the same room with the same lighting). the S2 is a more expensive but canon also sells an S1 which also has very good reviews on amazon. i recommend checking it out. diff --git a/SINAI-SA-corpus/3/ref1378_rate3.txt b/SINAI-SA-corpus/3/ref1378_rate3.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..76159f659e45b2fe535538c4345bec011c82b6cc --- /dev/null +++ b/SINAI-SA-corpus/3/ref1378_rate3.txt @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ + Disappointed, May 1, 2006 + ByMcSue (Minneapolis, MN) - See all my reviews +I wanted this to be the dream camera. Having burned through many small digitals since my first one in 2000, I am ready to buy a camera with a bit more size, a better zoom and a few more features. The price was right on this one, I liked the way it felt, it has a big lens and a burst mode for photographing my son's sports, and the controls were simple to understand and work. There are several solid reviews from good sources for this camera, as well as a couple mediocre ones--but the camera offers so many features at such a reasonable price that I hoped the so-so reviews were from camera snobs and that we would be pleased enough. No such luck. Unfortunately, the picture quality for this camera is often not as good as that of some of the cheap little pocket size digitals we've had previously. Pictures taken outside seem to be quite good, but pictures in lower light when using some zoom tend to be very fuzzy. By lower light, I mean inside the house with indoor lighting in the evening--I'm not trying to take pictures in a bat cave or dark museum, just the standard pictures any of us might want to snap in our kitchen or family room. I read reviews that said a drawback of this camera was its lack of image stablization. I thought, "no big deal, I'm very stable when I take pictures." Well, surprise, when a camera takes as long to focus in lower light as this one does (especially when using some zoom)we ALL shake. A good percentage of indoor pictures have been blurry because of this. And even the clear ones don't seem to be "knock your socks off" sharp. At the time I bought this, I was also looking at a Canon A610. This camera felt so much nicer. The Canon controls were totally inexplicable, making this Kodak look like a design marvel. Those are big pluses. But the bottom line is, a camera needs to take clear, clean pictures and in that area, this one is not living up to expectations ADDENDUM, added later: I've been outdoors taking pictures of a variety of plants, flowers and scenery and comparing them to the same pics taken on a decent little Nikon Coolpix. Wow, is there a difference! Outside, this camera takes oustanding photos. I feel compelled to raise it up a star but the edit later feature doesn't let me. Give it a 4, not a 3. Definitely has its good points. diff --git a/SINAI-SA-corpus/3/ref1383_rate3.txt b/SINAI-SA-corpus/3/ref1383_rate3.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..8c42d8acdf2ab7f31671941145629d3b7b6e2032 --- /dev/null +++ b/SINAI-SA-corpus/3/ref1383_rate3.txt @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ + 3.5 stars... pros and cons, May 6, 2006 + ByJ. Woolever "her daughter" (good ol' US of A) - See all my reviews +I've had this camera for about 6 monthes, and have recently become disapointed with the Z740's preformance. I started selling my photos in a pathetic attempt to make some much needed money, and am almost(almost being the key word)embarressed by the low quality. Pros and Cons- Pros: 1)Relatively compact 2)auto mode usually works pretty well 3)you don't have to use flash most of the time 4)you can easily review, delete, and retake a photo without missing your shot 5)quick start-up 6)nice album softwear 7)easy to use 8)Outdoor photos are very crisp Cons- 1)Takes too long to focus, I often lose my pictures because of this (kids tend to move quite fast...) 2)Indoor pictures are often blurry, or grainy 3)manual controls are minimal 4)LCD screen malfunctions sometimes (is this just me...?) 5)lens cap WILL NOT STAY ON! 6)additional lenses are limited 7)I personally had to take my camera back and exchange it 3 times, once for messed up LCD, once for broken lens, and once for it being completely dead... 8)The printer dock, if you get it, is a waste... goes through ink in 8 prints, leaves white spots on the pictures, and the actual photos scratch very very easily Overall, this camera is acceptable if you're a casual photographer looking to impress your friends.... and not much more. If you're looking to become professional or at the least sell or present your photos to people, save your money and go for an SLR. diff --git a/SINAI-SA-corpus/3/ref1400_rate3.txt b/SINAI-SA-corpus/3/ref1400_rate3.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..c9c2269a3eafb2f39529bdd65cd9f343061f320d --- /dev/null +++ b/SINAI-SA-corpus/3/ref1400_rate3.txt @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ + Actually 3 1/2 stars, June 30, 2006 + ByNancy P. Jones "Jonesy" (San Antonio, TX USA) - See all my reviews +We bought this camera last January for our honeymoon. We have really put this camera to use. Great handy little camera but with two exceptions: (1) When taking pictures in dark places and using flash, it does not come out well. (2) When downloading pictures to your computer, they appear 2-3 shades darker than while looking at them on camera. diff --git a/SINAI-SA-corpus/3/ref1436_rate3.txt b/SINAI-SA-corpus/3/ref1436_rate3.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..872da6cb61525122c37deff54ac0c3db365872f9 --- /dev/null +++ b/SINAI-SA-corpus/3/ref1436_rate3.txt @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ + When it's good, it's really good..., January 21, 2008 + Bybuddyhead (Taxachusetts) - See all my reviews +... and when it's bad, it's awful. A couple of the other reviews for this product hit the camera's cons on the head. In order of annoyance (1 being most annoying): (1) The focus is lousy. It's horrendous in low light, and just plain bad in perfectly bright light. I've found this camera has a real tendency to focus very precisely on background objects, even when you take care to make sure the green focus brackets are positioned correctly. (2) The flash is weak in low light... except for when it is way too powerful. I have a ton of photos where subjects' faces are awash in bright white light. There is no controlling this, and in fact, I have taken the same shot several times in a row and experienced varying intensities of flash despite not doing anything differently. And beware that the LCD screen will often make outdoor photos look darker than they really are (which causes you to use the flash for the next shot, which causes overexposed photos, which causes you to disable the flash... repeat, repeat, repeat). (3) The lens cap is so awful it positively leaps off the camera. The attachment point for the lens strap busted, too, so the lens cap falls to the ground now. I swear, if you look at this camera the wrong way, the lens cap falls off. A solution is to shoot tons of pictures for any given scene or subject, plan on chucking about 1/2 of them due to flash or focus, and you'll be fine. The ones that eventually achieve the right balances can be excellent, but, boy, is it a labor to get to them. diff --git a/SINAI-SA-corpus/3/ref1437_rate3.txt b/SINAI-SA-corpus/3/ref1437_rate3.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..b2ab4fc54c0a98257cd254c46025f7d54f46b277 --- /dev/null +++ b/SINAI-SA-corpus/3/ref1437_rate3.txt @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ + AutoFocus and Color-Quality Not What I Had Hoped For..., September 17, 2007 + ByPiXiEmOm - See all my reviews +I bought this camera expecting quality photos. That "color science chip" logo seemed so promising. Unfortunately, the colors are not as vibrant as I had expected. Most of the time, images seem washed out. Of course, you can go through the menu and select "vivid color", but it's time-consuming, AND you have to do that EVERY time you turn the camera on. What a pain! The white balance on this camera is also disappointing. The auto-focus was the most disappointing feature of this camera. It has significant difficulties focusing in low light, but also picks the most inconvenient times to have difficulty focusing during the day as well. If you're planning on taking pictures indoors under incandescent lights, you might as well find a different camera, because this one refuses to focus. The flash also washes people out unless you're standing about 8 feet away from them. I really expected a lot more from Kodak....looks like I'll be buying another Canon next time! : 0P diff --git a/SINAI-SA-corpus/3/ref1438_rate3.txt b/SINAI-SA-corpus/3/ref1438_rate3.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..52de995c66225e9228adadde1260c6747b0c895f --- /dev/null +++ b/SINAI-SA-corpus/3/ref1438_rate3.txt @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ + small annoyances, June 18, 2007 + ByD. Berube "water lover" (Taunton, MA) - See all my reviews +I have been happy with the quality of the pictures which has been very rewarding. I do have a couple of compaints though that I find worth sharing with others interested in this camera. The reviews I read before my purchase stated how the pop the lense cap popping off every time you turn the camera on is quite annoying which I found to be the case. There's no option to just look at your photos without the lense pushing out and the cap popping off. I have found that a camera that has an automatic lense like that uses up the battery pretty quickly. I find I need to replace the battery every 3 months with just general use of the camera. If purchasing this camera, buy the recharger along with it and a case as well. Also, the camera is very awkward to carry around to events without a case. diff --git a/SINAI-SA-corpus/3/ref1447_rate3.txt b/SINAI-SA-corpus/3/ref1447_rate3.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..2089ecffa59936277c21fc68ab28e834135e69b5 --- /dev/null +++ b/SINAI-SA-corpus/3/ref1447_rate3.txt @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ + Auto focus problems, September 21, 2002 + By A Customer +This is my first digital camera. The sharpness of the images and the ability to manipulate images in the computer are astounding. I cropped out about one third of an image, saved it on a CD, then took it to a Kinko's and printed it on a Kodak machine. I blew it up to an 8x10. I swear, you'd think it was taken in a studio with a Hasselblad. Sending jpegs over email is so fast and easy a child could do it.Here's my beef: I can't get the auto focus to work ... in low light. By low light, I mean ambient light indoors at night; say for example, taking snapshots at your kid's birthday party. It doesn't seem to matter what auto focus settings I use. This problem comes close to ruining the camera for me. Now, as I said, this is my first digital camera, so I have nothing to compare it to. I don't know if the Coolpix is better/worse/the same as other digital cameras. I am told that auto focus in low light is an issue for all digital cameras. Anyhow, be alert to that problem, try to research it, and ask yourself, if you can't take snapshots of your kid's birthday party, what good is it? diff --git a/SINAI-SA-corpus/3/ref1460_rate3.txt b/SINAI-SA-corpus/3/ref1460_rate3.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..67c60ffec77f09995aa05049753fdaf2427ac799 --- /dev/null +++ b/SINAI-SA-corpus/3/ref1460_rate3.txt @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ + Complicated camera, lacks some basic features, May 30, 2004 + By A Customer +I purchased this camera when it first came out based on the rave reviews of the photo quality. Indeed, it takes great photos. However, there are some basic design flaws and ommisions that I felt were critical enough to get rid of it and replace it with a different camera. The location of some the buttons is just wrong. It is easy to inadvertently change a setting just by trying to hold the camera.The setup and menus are VERY complicated...much more confusing that any of the 5 other digicams I've owned. It also doesn't alow you to rotate the photos for correct display on a TV set....even my $300 Canon does that....and the Canon automatically displays each photo correctly. The most significant ommision, however, is the lack of a focus assist-lamp for low-light conditions. Since it's virtually impossible to manually focus a digital camera, you need a reliable auto-focus. We found that even in modest low-light settings we couldn't get it to focus. My wife was so frustrated with it that she wouldn't even use it. We replaced it with a Canon which we are very happy with. diff --git a/SINAI-SA-corpus/3/ref1521_rate3.txt b/SINAI-SA-corpus/3/ref1521_rate3.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..8efbd5aca50c92b06c18b9f7778ec28abcabc2a5 --- /dev/null +++ b/SINAI-SA-corpus/3/ref1521_rate3.txt @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ + Save your money-buy the real thing, April 25, 2005 + ByMichael S. Levy - See all my reviews +If you are looking for an entry level professional camera, save up and buy an SLR. I have had this camera for a little over a month and am ready to throw it out the window. AUTO FOCUS PROBLEMS The thing can't take a picture that's in focus. At one to one, out of the 958 pictures I've taken, none of them are sharp. It simply can't do it. Many subjects it can't focus at all. Its impossible to judge from the tiny monitor the true sharpness of the photo. Its not uncommon to review a batch of photos on the computer and find that half of them are completely fuzzy. The auto focus is also extremely slow. It can take several seconds for the camera find its mark. MANUAL FOCUS IS A JOKE The manual focus is awkward to use. Although, that's prety much irellevant because the camera's monitor does not have enough resolution to use it. Its been suggested to me that I try bracketing the focus. Except, the point of bracketing is not to be aimlessly wasting memory, hoping that one of the shots is good. TIGHTEST APERATURE IS 8.7 I thought I could deal with this because most of the work I do is in moderate to low light. That was a mistake. This compounds the previously mentioned Auto Focus issues. HIGH RESOLUTION The difference from a 35mm film scan is astounding. Its amazing to pull up a 6X9 at 300 ppi with no noise or grain. EASY TO USE The camera is set up like the 35mm SLR I've used for years to and have found it easy to navigate. The buttons on the side can be touched accidentally causing some minor annoyance. CONCLUSION If you are a casual user, this camera may be just fine for you. The focusing issues become pronounced when you are trying to achieve a specific aestetic. Perfect focus may not be that important to you eighter, especially if you print mostly to 4x6 or 5x7. Looking at the other ratings, many people love this camera. However, the serious amateur or entry level proffesional should not waste their time and money on this camera. diff --git a/SINAI-SA-corpus/3/ref1529_rate3.txt b/SINAI-SA-corpus/3/ref1529_rate3.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..14578a6a4d4ca01d46387943b542e71b44b667e5 --- /dev/null +++ b/SINAI-SA-corpus/3/ref1529_rate3.txt @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ + SLOW FOCUS! Good pics when you don't miss them!, January 4, 2004 + By A Customer +My father raved about this camera. So, when he died and left me some money, I bought the camera. Now I wish I hadn't! I had a $200 Kodak digital with nearly no megapixels, and it took awesome pictures, quickly, and even in low light. But, I could not blow them up very big. The Nikon 5700 takes HUGE pictures, but I rarely get good ones, because the focus is so slow that my subject has left the building before the darned camera focuses! It can't focus in low light situations at all, and beware buying kits, because most of the stuff that came in my "Kit" doesn't fit the stupid camera! Plan to buy at least four batteries in all (and an extra charger), because you need to have two batteries charging and two batteries with you at all times. This thing doesn't just eat batteries, it chews them up and spits them out! The ttl viewfinder is digital too, so very hard to see what you are actually getting, but the LCD viewfinder drains batteries like kids suck down Mountain Dew! I use the TIFF format so I have good luck with enlargements, but they use so much card space that I had to buy a 1G card to be able to take 60 pictures. The 8 mb card that came with the camera would only take ONE! Nikon makes good products, but this is not one of them! Find a camera with fast focus, or you will wish you had! diff --git a/SINAI-SA-corpus/3/ref1533_rate3.txt b/SINAI-SA-corpus/3/ref1533_rate3.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..119fc33f18b5a47b1e830ea959e0a2d717901e88 --- /dev/null +++ b/SINAI-SA-corpus/3/ref1533_rate3.txt @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ + Slow/confused auto focus, August 3, 2003 + By A Customer +I have always used Nikon 35mm SLR Cameras for my photography hobby and decided to go for a digital and bought coolpix 5700. The camera takes great pictures, but too slow in focusing. it's got lot of features but takes too many buttons to set. while you are trying set up your camera you'll miss your shots. I been taking it mostly in manual mode because, I have hard time getting the correct exposure from program mode, so I use manual, shutter/apature priority. My recommandation is if you are taking moving objects, the camera is way too slow (typical digital camera is slow but I find that it's slower than avg), but if you are taking non moving object such as landscape, it takes excellent pictures. my biggest frustration of using this camera is that it's way toooooooo slow. If I get the correct setting for picture in time, the picture quality is excellent, but main problems is setting the camera up correctly ( or I could in my learning curve). diff --git a/SINAI-SA-corpus/3/ref1587_rate3.txt b/SINAI-SA-corpus/3/ref1587_rate3.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..040e2dd5fe10a737e2fb89a7e0874f5b2c15dd96 --- /dev/null +++ b/SINAI-SA-corpus/3/ref1587_rate3.txt @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ + Wasn't quite a good as I would have hoped, September 17, 2008 + ByR. Cathcart (Louisville, Ky) - See all my reviews +I dropped my Canon 800si camera and the shutter quit working. Since it was over the warranty period, I bought this camera as a replacement since it looked so cool. I found it not to be as good as my Canon for zooming and picture quality even though my Canon was a 7.1 megapixel and this one is a 10 megapixel. I should have bought another Canon 800si. diff --git a/SINAI-SA-corpus/3/ref1598_rate3.txt b/SINAI-SA-corpus/3/ref1598_rate3.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..40c66e0cb5837a8babb35b64659f99007002e2dc --- /dev/null +++ b/SINAI-SA-corpus/3/ref1598_rate3.txt @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ + Great Pics before it died, July 28, 2008 + ByJames Devore "Devo63" (Valencia, CA USA) - See all my reviews +Got this camera in anticipation of lots of snorkeling in Maui, Hawaii. Great pics above and below water for 5 of 6 days of the trip. On the 6th day, the best snorkeling spot the camera would not work. Water had gotten inside the camera. So I'm conflicted in the review. Thrilled with the pics I got, really, really upset I missed taking pics on the last day of my trip. diff --git a/SINAI-SA-corpus/3/ref1599_rate3.txt b/SINAI-SA-corpus/3/ref1599_rate3.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..a809dbe545ff080d5bd775c2787575d830946bcb --- /dev/null +++ b/SINAI-SA-corpus/3/ref1599_rate3.txt @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ + Fun for kids, July 28, 2008 + ByAndrea R. Polin "DreaRose" (Lakeland, FL) - See all my reviews +I like this camera for a 'FUN CAMERA'. The zoom isn't very good at all. The audio is horrible. But I do like how long the video clips can be and I LOVE the waterproof and shockproof feature. I bought the 'silicone skin' for a cover and it's basically my 5 year old boys camera. He enjoys playing with it and I have no worries. diff --git a/SINAI-SA-corpus/3/ref164_rate3.txt b/SINAI-SA-corpus/3/ref164_rate3.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..bd4ff1219a92aad1d5d8ee52ef6b53490ee931b0 --- /dev/null +++ b/SINAI-SA-corpus/3/ref164_rate3.txt @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ + A warning to those with less than nimble fingers.., November 28, 2008 + ByD. White - See all my reviews +In looking for a point and shoot for my aged mother who is very anxious to embrace digital photography, I was naturally drawn to this camera based upon it's popularity and reviews. Here's the catch - the ergonomics of this camera, while OK, are not suited by any stretch to those who may be challenged with even the slightest hand/finger challenges. This applies pretty much across the board to most point and shoot cameras, and smallish electronics - they're just not comfortable unless you've got young nimble hands. Why can't these manufacturers take into account those who are a bit physically challenged as well? It's because they design in vacuums - I challenge them to put on a pair of lightweight gloves, then design. At least that will give some perspective. diff --git a/SINAI-SA-corpus/3/ref1652_rate3.txt b/SINAI-SA-corpus/3/ref1652_rate3.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..c9e4378a3eb3ea4b0ee93f6281ad35644ccf3d0b --- /dev/null +++ b/SINAI-SA-corpus/3/ref1652_rate3.txt @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ + Rugged and waterproof, but takes lousy pictures, May 27, 2008 + ByMichael Trotman (Daniel Island, SC USA) - See all my reviews +Olympus Stylus 1030SW 10.1MP Digital Camera with 3.6x Optical Wide Angle Zoom (Silver) This is a nice camera if you're looking primarily for a camera that is small, rugged, and waterproof. However, if you're looking for a camera that takes great pictures - keep looking. The image quality is terrible so forget the 10.1 mega pixel feature. And since the 3.6 optical zoom is hardly enough to zoom in on far away objects the poor image quality becomes a big deal. When you crop a photo in an attempt to "zoom" digitally, you can see terrible pixilation, grain, and blur. I considered sending the camera back to Amazon, but decided to keep it for taking photos in the water. If I didn't want that feature I would have definitely returned it for something else. diff --git a/SINAI-SA-corpus/3/ref1656_rate3.txt b/SINAI-SA-corpus/3/ref1656_rate3.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..9945e43f9029348183071e7846de619d9908ec80 --- /dev/null +++ b/SINAI-SA-corpus/3/ref1656_rate3.txt @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ + Waterproof vs. Image Quality, May 15, 2008 + Bym. fung (new york, ny usa) - See all my reviews +Purchased Olympus 1030SW mainly for waterproof/freezer/drop features. My vacations are watersports and wintersports. So now I don't have to worry about climate and environment factors effecting my pictures or making sure the camera is inside a ziploc bag. BUT ... the image quality is sacrificed. My old Canon S400 4MP camera image quality is better, I mean way better. Sharper + better color. Even the Canon flash pictures don't look so "white". Since I don't print anything bigger than 5x7, I can live with it for now. diff --git a/SINAI-SA-corpus/3/ref1660_rate3.txt b/SINAI-SA-corpus/3/ref1660_rate3.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..2edc770f96eae8c914d700192ce80edaf03e47b2 --- /dev/null +++ b/SINAI-SA-corpus/3/ref1660_rate3.txt @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ + Final Thoughts - Great camera for what it's meant to do. Good enough outside of the water., August 26, 2008 + ByB. Wong (San Jose, CA) - See all my reviews +***Edit #2 - After using the camera a lot more, including in my pool, i've upgraded my rating to a 4 star. The underwater capabilities of this camera are great. Great photo quality (clearer the water, the better). Survivability of camera is also great. So far, 2 trips to the pool, approximately 30 min of consistent time under the water, including me jumping into the pool with the camera running - no significant issues so far. Quality of pics are great. Clear water provides great range. You can see the other end of the pool from the opposite end clearly. You will occasionally get bubbles that form on the lens and therefore, your image will contain this bubble, but, crap happens. the bubbles did not stay on the camera and that's what's important. I took a video of myslef jumping into the pool - no degradation in image quality nor issues with camera functionality. Worked great. No sound though for underwater movie mode - but it makes sense since otherwise, all you'd hear is water swooshing. You're not buying this camera to listen to whales after all. *** I've had this camera for a little over two weeks. Bought it so that i can take underwater images when in Hawaii. Haven't tried out the waterproof aspect yet, but can go ahead and give some insight into the quality of its normal pics. 10 mp camera, but is limited to 3 mp images when shooting on some of the preset modes (scenes) - specifically candlelight images and other night-time image settings. If you don't use the scene options, your images can be maxed at the 10 mp setting. Night images using scene (candlelight) were pretty grainy, so i'd avoid using that setting. Normal daytime images were good. Crisp and clear. From power to first image - is really quick. However, taking one image at 10 mp causes a delay before you can take the next image of ~2 seconds. Unless you use the burst mode. 3-shot burst allows for 10 mp images, whereas the super 12 shot mode caps it again at 3 mp images. People have written that the lcd screen is easy to see in any light from any angle. I discovered that this is not true. Taking an image into the sun (i know this isn't recommended) while holding the camera up high (which people will use when at weddings to shoot over people's heads) leads to glare. I had to guess what i was shooting at. I'd say image visibility on the lcd was ~50% when doing this. Even given the above, i still like the camera a lot. Looks nice. Takes panoramic photos, battery lasts forever. Used it on and off for 4 days before it finally warned me of being low. Be careful b/c the battery indicator is deceiving. It said full for most of the time and then jumped to warning quick on me. Didn't even notice any intermediate indication position. I give it a 3 for now until i go and try out the underwater capability. Edit #1: Forgot to mention that the menus are pretty easy to use. Scrolling wheel menu cycles between the different options. One touch photo preview. Icons are easy to understand. I've tried using the macro and super macro - works really well. Good detail on the close images. One other con though - could not for the life of me figure out how to get the face detection to work. I swear that it'll sometimes follow a face and sometimes it'll target a random cup. I don't yet see an option in any of the menus that allows me to force it to do face rec every shot. Not a huge issue - but it's a spec that is being advertised, therefore i expect it to work. diff --git a/SINAI-SA-corpus/3/ref1663_rate3.txt b/SINAI-SA-corpus/3/ref1663_rate3.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..06cea834dc26a7589ad095ee9c52cdb8a5ba41a2 --- /dev/null +++ b/SINAI-SA-corpus/3/ref1663_rate3.txt @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ + Waterlogged Easily, June 9, 2008 + ByBret Schumacher (Kauai, Hawaii) - See all my reviews +Purchased this camera and within a month of snorkeling on weekends (live in Hawaii) the camera was full of water without going deeper than maybe 5ft. The product was purchased directly through amazon.com versus through one of the other vendors available through amazon.com so the return policy was easy & uncomplicated - they even paid for the return shipping costs & made a full refund. My next camera purchase is the same model through amazon.com as well (return process was so easy always check vendor if possible) as the picture clarity is great, camera is so simple and easy to use, and is compact enough you can swim without it being too bulky or heavy. New order should arrive this week - check to see in a month if the last one was just a fluk defect or if this camera is flawed as a quasi-underwater camera for novice photographers. I look forward to purchasing the underwater housing...then it can come along on scuba days too! diff --git a/SINAI-SA-corpus/3/ref166_rate3.txt b/SINAI-SA-corpus/3/ref166_rate3.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..e94aca65d5c635cfa9a9208ff8c133af480abbb4 --- /dev/null +++ b/SINAI-SA-corpus/3/ref166_rate3.txt @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ + Bigger than I expected, May 19, 2008 + ByG. Farrell "KA's Mom" (Texas) - See all my reviews +Camera seemed nice enough, but I was looking for something significantly smaller. I only turned it on once, but I noticed a significant delay between shots when using the flash. Not a great feature when you are trying to take pictures of kids. I returned it for the Canon SD1100is, which I love. diff --git a/SINAI-SA-corpus/3/ref1672_rate3.txt b/SINAI-SA-corpus/3/ref1672_rate3.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..a5fed5f851214b93004ef609e1e36a11674da054 --- /dev/null +++ b/SINAI-SA-corpus/3/ref1672_rate3.txt @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ + Durable point-and-shoot for the outdoors, November 2, 2008 + ByMichael Kerber (Chapel Hill, NC USA) - See all my reviews +I bought this camera to replace my old powershot SD700, which broke when it was dropped onto a carpeted floor from a height of maybe 4 feet. Overall, I'm happy with the Olympus, but it falls short of my SD700 in a few areas. Pros: - The Olympus is smaller than I expected. It fits easily into my pocket and is not cumbersome to carry around on backpacking trips, for example. - This thing is durable. You can feel the "sturdiness." I added a screen protector from bestskinsever, and now I feel like it's indestructible. I never worry about it. - It does a great job with macros (close-ups). It even has a special macro mode that uses a small, built-in LED to light your subject. Very nice feature. - It has an impressive zoom; better than the 3X of my old SD700. - It has an impressively high-res CCD: 10.1MP; again, better than my old SD700. Cons: - My old SD700 still took better pictures. I can't think of a way to quantify this qualitative observation, but I think it's true. I recently went on a backpacking trip and my buddy brought his camera, which happened to be an SD700. We took pictures of the same scenery, but the Fall colors looked more vibrant through his camera. Images also seem..."sharper" with the SD700, despite the megapixel advantage of the Olympus. Maybe someone who knows more about cameras could explain this. - There are a handful of different acquisition settings on the Olympus, but navigating to them is not very intuitive and definitely not very fast. - There's no real manual control of things like shutter speed, etc. I use this camera for all of my outdoor activities: backpacking, snowboarding, climbing, and trips to the beach. That's what this thing was made for, and it feels good to carry it around in my pocket or toss it into my gear bag without worrying about it breaking like my other cameras. The pictures it takes are good enough for me, but are out-shined even by older, cheaper cameras of the same size. If you get this camera, you'll like it. Just keep in mind that you're paying quite a premium for durability. diff --git a/SINAI-SA-corpus/3/ref1682_rate3.txt b/SINAI-SA-corpus/3/ref1682_rate3.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..4381584fbabdf4ca203001708e9f9b82300bf91c --- /dev/null +++ b/SINAI-SA-corpus/3/ref1682_rate3.txt @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ + 1030 SW great idea, failed after a week of heavy use, January 20, 2009 + ByJames Kirchhoffer - See all my reviews +I used my 1030 SW as backup for a digital SLR during a once in a lifetime cruise through the Galapagos. Picture quality good for P after 4 one hour trips in the water, the camera failed. It turned on and off, but would not take pictures and the LCD screen did not work. I am sending it back for replacement. Its a great idea for a go anywhere do anything camera, but it did not stand up to what I consider minor water exposure. Others have had better experience, but I had not warning of potential crash. diff --git a/SINAI-SA-corpus/3/ref169_rate3.txt b/SINAI-SA-corpus/3/ref169_rate3.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..1e5b709a295648d30d341ae54aac7f6e52041b7b --- /dev/null +++ b/SINAI-SA-corpus/3/ref169_rate3.txt @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ + Canon 590, January 7, 2009 + ByF. Lopez (Chatsworth, CA) - See all my reviews +If I had known it takes so long for the camera to be ready for the next picture, I would have bought something else. If you want a camera that takes a picture when you press the button, buy a different camera. Or, if you want a camera that can take multiple pictures quickly, buy a different camera. This is a great camera for taking group pictures, outdoor pictures or things that don't move. Don't buy it to take action shots. You'll miss every one of them. diff --git a/SINAI-SA-corpus/3/ref1701_rate3.txt b/SINAI-SA-corpus/3/ref1701_rate3.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..cf44421594501d5d287599d576db409e6a5fffb4 --- /dev/null +++ b/SINAI-SA-corpus/3/ref1701_rate3.txt @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ + Defect in the Olympus Stylus 1030sw, August 27, 2008 + ByG. Appell - See all my reviews +The Olympus Stylus 1030SW has been shipping with a known defect by Olympus. In the video recording mode the sound track contains a popping sound. It is generated by any touching of the camera. Olympus is supposedly coming out with a firmware fix in September. The buyer should beware of this problem and perhaps wait to purchase until a fix is incorporated in the cameras. diff --git a/SINAI-SA-corpus/3/ref1707_rate3.txt b/SINAI-SA-corpus/3/ref1707_rate3.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..9f24bf5a71271a390ebd160fd41b8dcf689e418e --- /dev/null +++ b/SINAI-SA-corpus/3/ref1707_rate3.txt @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ + The ideal knockabout travelling camera, except for two problems., February 7, 2009 + ByM. C. Corcoran "Corky" (Portland OR USA) - See all my reviews +I purchased this to be the camera I could finally just stick in my pocket or pack and be gone. No other has been able to take the abuse. And it's very, very good, including features and optional on-camera guides to effects. The problems have to do with use as a travelling camera. One cannot download pictures without their special computer to camera cord. Looks like a mini-USB, isn't, and you can't take pictures and process on a friends laptop without dragging that around also. When one is travelling light carrying the cord is a nuisance. It's in the way and weighs. An out would have been having an SD card instead of their proprietary memory card. Their card cannot be read by anything found in the course of normal human events. Bluetooth would have been nice. Great item as long as one wants it only for short jaunts and doesn't plan on processing any photos without dragging along that proprietary cord. Or a reader of some type for their memory card. diff --git a/SINAI-SA-corpus/3/ref1765_rate3.txt b/SINAI-SA-corpus/3/ref1765_rate3.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..f56175561cb27de784c58b2a0db33ffcf0ee3802 --- /dev/null +++ b/SINAI-SA-corpus/3/ref1765_rate3.txt @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ + I must have got a lemon, June 25, 2007 + ByMike Pod (Geneseo, NY) - See all my reviews +I currently own and I am fairly happy with a Pentax Ist DS. I own several Pentax lenses. I was very dissappointed with the K10D. I got much clearer shots with my Ist DS. I tried all the tweeks I have read in several reviews. I even shot in RAW mode and post processed in Photoshop. I hope I just got a lemon. Thank god for Amazon's return policy otherwise I would have probably been stuck with it. I am afraid I am going to bite the bullet and go with the Nikon D200. diff --git a/SINAI-SA-corpus/3/ref1771_rate3.txt b/SINAI-SA-corpus/3/ref1771_rate3.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..0669b805633d5d5144a9b3aed580d9d0732ad42a --- /dev/null +++ b/SINAI-SA-corpus/3/ref1771_rate3.txt @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ + READ THE COMMENTS TO THE REVIEWS HERE, July 2, 2007 + ByI. Randolph S. Shiner "irsslex" (San Diego, CA United States) - See all my reviews +READ THE COMMENTS TO THE REVIEWS HERE. DO NOT RELY ON THEM ALONE. I am a newbie (well, a prospective, researching newbie) and am doing my homework before I shell out the bucks for a decent DSLR as I've outgrown my Nikon Coolpix 8800. From what I can tell from my homework, the Pentax is a great camera -- ergo the distinguished awards it won in Europe and Japan for being the best camera of 2007 -- but has trouble in low-light situations with the auto-focus. This is important to me, since I do a lot of low-light shooting in jazz clubs. I need a camera that can handle those sorts of situations as well as one that can handle portraiture, landscapes and such. On that issue alone, I am leaning against this camera and toward the Nikon D80 or D200. The Canon 30D would be great, but (and I know this isn't as important to some) it only has 8MP, which is what I have now. I want the ability to crop photos without losing too much data, so that camera is out of the running. In an ideal world, all these cameras would be 12MP, but the price for those are astronomical to me and I can't justify one of the costlier Canons. But to say, as this reviewer does -- without qualification -- that this camera is only good if you have Pentax legacy lenses is just not true and is misleading. I still don't understand (perhaps it's the time of night I am writing this) his explanation of why he said this, as there are, from what I can see, plenty of Pentax lenses. All of which is a pity since all the lenses in the world can't make up for a camera that can't supremely handle low-light situations. diff --git a/SINAI-SA-corpus/3/ref1777_rate3.txt b/SINAI-SA-corpus/3/ref1777_rate3.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..bdc1a0b79e322951aefb5cde86dcd1f71a4e8ba2 --- /dev/null +++ b/SINAI-SA-corpus/3/ref1777_rate3.txt @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ + Some issues prevent this from being THE camera to beat, January 2, 2008 + ByD. Kim "kimdani1" (York, PA) - See all my reviews +I've personally owned the following digital SLR cameras: Original Canon Digital Rebel, Nikon D70, Canon 20D, Pentax K10D, and now the Nikon D300 Out of all the DSLR's on that list, the only one I ever returned was the Pentax K10D. Prior to purchasing it, I read every review I could find and felt that I was making a well informed decision. None of the local shops carried the Pentax K10D, so I had to order it online, sight unseen. On paper, the camera was definitely impressive with weather-sealing, sensor dust reduction, sensor anti-shake, etc. However, once I received the camera, I found myself becoming frustrated with some of the issues. First off, the JPG images from the camera were definitely softer (lacking sharpness) as compared to any other DSLR that I had ever owned. This was later confirmed in tests that are viewable on www.dpreview.com Although conversion of the RAW files into JPG corrects this issue, I have neither the time nor patience to post process every photo that I take. I prefer JPG images that are printable right out of the camera without the need for image manipulation. (I shoot both JPG + RAW and use the RAW as a digital negative) To make matters worse, the issue of JPG sharpness is not resolved with increasing the sharpness level in camera. Worsening my impression of the camera was poor white balance performance. Indoors, too many of the photos had a sickly yellow cast which required reprocessing of the RAW files or shooting with manual white balance to counteract. Lastly, the camera's metering system was all over the place. With the main subject in the center of the screen, if I took three pictures in a row without moving an inch, one photo would be overexposed and another would be underexposed. I quadruple checked to make sure that exposure bracketing was off, but this issue would pop up at random. I'll be the first to admit that the camera I received (it was definitely brand new) might have been defective. However, given all the issues I was having, I decided to return the camera and resumed using my Canon 20D. The faster speed of the Canon (5fps) as well as the better autofocus (hunts less in low light) and better high ISO performance were all factors that returned me to using the Canon. I truly wanted to like the Pentax K10D, but was ultimately unable to make it work for me. Given the number of positive raving reviews here, I'd say that just about everyone who owns one likes it. However, from my own personal experience, I'd say this camera was less than the sum of its parts. The price is indeed tempting considering how low it is compared to similar offerings from Canon/Nikon/Sony/Olympus, but I'd recommend trying this camera out in person before plunking down your hard earned cash. Also, be sure to take a SD card along with you so you can save some images onto the card to review later. If you like what you see, then by all means buy the camera and be happy. diff --git a/SINAI-SA-corpus/3/ref1864_rate3.txt b/SINAI-SA-corpus/3/ref1864_rate3.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..d998b63e5d83f32e2996a71ab62e4f6bcc5b3751 --- /dev/null +++ b/SINAI-SA-corpus/3/ref1864_rate3.txt @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ + Not sure what to expect, October 25, 2008 + ByA. Groth (Norway) - See all my reviews +I've researched almost all beginner/advanced DSLRs on the market, preparing the move from digital compacts to DSLR (I'm familiar with film SLRs however). Anyway, exhausted from the fact that the perfect DSLR still has not been produced (every single model has something really bad about it: Canon 450D's grip and build quality, Olympus E-520's tiny viewfinder, Nikon D60's very basic metering, and none of these models has a live view implementation that would really make me use it), I decided to go for Pentax which has good performance on the above issues. Looking initially into the K20D, I decided to get the cheaper body of the K200D and invest in better lenses instead. The K200D felt very good in my hands, and its large and bright viewfinder is the best in its class. The availability of high quality and still affordable lenses with shake reduction built into the camera body was also a deal maker. Amazon and Adorama delivered in 2 days as promised. A couple of weeks after purchase I have a collection of some very nice shots, but still I'm a bit disappointed. Autofocus is unpredictable: sometimes the camera shoots lightning fast, even in burst mode, at other times is struggles to focus with no apparent reason, even with the prime 50mm f1,4 and the new 17-70 f4 zoom. This means that I miss some nice shots while the camera is focussing. When the camera finally does take a shot, I'd say 1 out of 3 shots is out of focus. I end up taking lots of photos hoping one of them will be right. TO be fair, when the K200D gets the focussing right, the results are very good. Colors are very natural, the exposure is always spot-on, and wireless flash (got the 360FGZ) works very well, too. The viewfinder is wonderful to work with. All in all, I'm not sure what to expect for this price. The K200D's speed is unstable compared to all other cameras I've used (digital and film). Too bad, but perhaps I'm just expeting too much. diff --git a/SINAI-SA-corpus/3/ref1942_rate3.txt b/SINAI-SA-corpus/3/ref1942_rate3.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..aa7f5e219a5cdc5444e2816af70a4d26951d30e9 --- /dev/null +++ b/SINAI-SA-corpus/3/ref1942_rate3.txt @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ + Wanted to like it but one main problem, June 13, 2008 + ByMike D. from Waukesha (Waukesha, WI USA) - See all my reviews +Really wanted to like this camera. Read a ton beforehand and it had mostly superlative reviews. I did like most everything about it except picture IQ-the most important feature in a camera. Severe underexposure in all modes. diff --git a/SINAI-SA-corpus/3/ref205_rate3.txt b/SINAI-SA-corpus/3/ref205_rate3.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..335e3b9e459ec75e5bfea4d36d2b1aa7776a1fa9 --- /dev/null +++ b/SINAI-SA-corpus/3/ref205_rate3.txt @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ + Great camera but...., February 18, 2009 + ByCourt T. Passant (New York, NY) - See all my reviews +This is a great camera for $100. great pics, easy to use. Only complaint, less than 30 days after I purchased it, I had to replace the date battery. Not an easy task in Buenos Aires. Why are these cameras shipping with old date batteries? diff --git a/SINAI-SA-corpus/3/ref20_rate3.txt b/SINAI-SA-corpus/3/ref20_rate3.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..23f75b29a64e23ccc1473950ad835d0884c78bd6 --- /dev/null +++ b/SINAI-SA-corpus/3/ref20_rate3.txt @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ + I've learned not to trust customer ratings., January 2, 2009 + ByJ. Ungerleider (Cincinnati, OH) - See all my reviews +I bought this camera for it's price. I wanted something that took a good photo and if I needed to replace it (or I lost it), it wouldn't be a total loss. The camera's pictures are pretty good, however, it's response is very, very slow. To boot up the camera, focus on a subject, and shoot a picture takes up to 20 seconds. Pressing the shoot button often results in a 1+ second response. If you are not perfectly focused on the subject(s) (i.e. when taking a picture of 2 people, if the center focus comes to rest between the subjects) the foreground comes out blurry. Overall, it's a good camera for someone who has never had a digital camera before. I'm going back to the Powershot/Elph series. diff --git a/SINAI-SA-corpus/3/ref211_rate3.txt b/SINAI-SA-corpus/3/ref211_rate3.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..ae072cf73b31405124ce562c8b3b830f0413c1ca --- /dev/null +++ b/SINAI-SA-corpus/3/ref211_rate3.txt @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ + A590IS - Awful battery life, February 17, 2009 + ByJ. N. Barstow Jr. "offshore1" (Melrose MA USA) - See all my reviews +I've had the PowerShot a590IS for only about a month now. I didn't expect the two AA batteries or the SD card that came with it to be anything spectacular. They weren't. Replaced the card with a 1gb eFilm PRO SD card and solved that problem. But the batteries -- After the supplied batteries quickly died, I replaced them with a pair of 2300 mAh Lenmar rechargables - fully charged. I expected to be off and running with a reasonable amount of battery life on hand. Not so. That wretched little, red low battery flashing icon came on in less than two hours of non-constant camera use. Two additional, freshly charged, batteries had the same result. I'm thinking this may be partially my fault as I did use the LED screen and flash about half that time. But I really do think I should have gotten more use from these batteries. So, I have purchased a pack of four Sanyo NiMH, Eneloop batteries and await their arrival. I did a lot of research on which batteries to purchase and try, and these seem to come out on top. It is claimed these particular batteries don't leak juice, just sitting there, the way others will. I have a Nikon dSLR and a Canon SD870IS and I'm just not used to low battery life. I wish this a590IS had the same type of battery that's in the 870. Perhaps I see the need to change the approach I have of tending to battery life with my use of the a590 camera. I've shut the LED off (on the 590) except for a few seconds of post-view after a shot. I have to use the LED to compose with the 870IS, but won't with the a590. I also find that the 590 gives me a "softer" print than the 870, but I can live with this. I really only want the a590 as a camera that can travel with me that I dont have to worry about. But, it would be nice to get some mileage out of it if I'm along the coast of Maine, or some such place for the day where it would get a good amount of use. I do really like this a590IS, but give it only three stars because I have no confidence in it's ability to last a reasonable amount of time. It hasn't done that yet. Perhaps the new batteries and my new approach (which I don't really think I should have to take) will make a difference here. I'll edit this whole thing if that's my experience after a reasonable amount of time. Maybe I should have gotten the updated Canon SD880IS and use 870IS as my travel companion. That would have been a great idea, but the 870IS is too expensive for the casual attitude I could have with the a590. Again, I do like the a590, but it does chew up the batteries - at least for me. I hope that changes. If it does, I'll report that. Until then. . . . diff --git a/SINAI-SA-corpus/3/ref224_rate3.txt b/SINAI-SA-corpus/3/ref224_rate3.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..227fe9860dc6d16d74b2b1bbaac81012acb715e7 --- /dev/null +++ b/SINAI-SA-corpus/3/ref224_rate3.txt @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ + Good for the $, June 8, 2008 + BySteven R. Rinaldo (Raleigh, NC USA) - See all my reviews +Its a good camera for the money, however I find that I receive better quality pitcures from my older model Canon Powershot A80 and the ease of use and speed is not quite as good either. diff --git a/SINAI-SA-corpus/3/ref22_rate3.txt b/SINAI-SA-corpus/3/ref22_rate3.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..c9db92e767151fb3ad780fe12dcf54715a2a3c6d --- /dev/null +++ b/SINAI-SA-corpus/3/ref22_rate3.txt @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ + Good everyday , November 28, 2008 + ByPatricia A. Hardigree "PatH" (NJ) - See all my reviews +I like the camera very much. Not as fast as I'd like it and the 2-AA batteries wear down quickly. Previous model took 4-AAs and the pictures were great so I stayed with the brand. diff --git a/SINAI-SA-corpus/3/ref232_rate3.txt b/SINAI-SA-corpus/3/ref232_rate3.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..ece4004b199284955fa7eded44904abb1644cd3e --- /dev/null +++ b/SINAI-SA-corpus/3/ref232_rate3.txt @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ + Good, but slow, February 12, 2009 + ByJeff Neuman Lee (IA United States) - See all my reviews +The recovery time from after a flash photo is abysmal. Slow. I dropped my previous Canon which had four batteries and weighed more. Well I miss being able to shoot when it comes up and this camera is just fine out doors, but you will not like the flash. diff --git a/SINAI-SA-corpus/3/ref238_rate3.txt b/SINAI-SA-corpus/3/ref238_rate3.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..9b6972a0251e9b144f4ea2199553db0b4a5d68f9 --- /dev/null +++ b/SINAI-SA-corpus/3/ref238_rate3.txt @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ + Disappointing Canon 590IS, February 10, 2009 + ByM. M. Berliner (Denver, CO USA) - See all my reviews + I owned two other Canon Power Shot cameras: the original A30 (3 MP), and the 530(5MP). I was most satisfied with both. I bought the 590IS for its image stabilization feature and the fact that it was 8 MP. I am disappointed. I have had more blurred pictures with this camera in three weeks than I had in the entire period of my ownership of the other two cameras. The viewfinder, a good feature not available in many new point-and-shoot cameras, is unreliable in terms of coverage; I never had this issue in either of the earlier Canon iterations. The color is spotty. The battery life is terrible. The motion pictures, at higher resolutions, are only 20 fps, rather than 30 in the older camras. This camera has all the bells and whistles, and appears to be a wonderful value for the money, but performance has been a disappointment. I prefer my three year old A 530 Power Shot. diff --git a/SINAI-SA-corpus/3/ref24_rate3.txt b/SINAI-SA-corpus/3/ref24_rate3.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..87f685df0eee3aba5072d69d7f1e915d68627a5b --- /dev/null +++ b/SINAI-SA-corpus/3/ref24_rate3.txt @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ + Canon goes cheap, in a bad way., September 6, 2008 + ByHappy Jester "happyjester" (FL, USA) - See all my reviews +Just a note to anyone consider the A590IS camera. I bought mine and tested for 3 hours. This is to replace my older 3.2 Megapixel Canon A510 (Which is not a perfect camera, but quite a good one!) Short story: Stay away from the A590IS, it is not better than the 3 year old A510! Very disappointed at Canon for putting out this subpar product. CONS: -Pictures are soft, almost out of focus. Compared A/B with the 510 on same shots identical settings at 3 Megapixels. 510 wins hands down. -Plastic case instead of metal. Cheap and light feel. If it falls, it is toast. -Screen is larger, but also are the pixels. So, same resolution at a larger screen = very poor poor LCD image quality. -Most of the advanced features, such as focus review etc, rely heavily on the LCD, which is of poor quality, so the new features are useless! -Uninmpressed by the Image Stabilization feature. But maybe I was expecting miracles here. -No Panorama mode. (510 had a stitch mode where you could panel Left to Right and overlap the pics). I used this a lot in the old camera. -Batteries and SD card in same compartment. When I take the SD card out, the batteries tend to fall out. Its just a cumbersome process! -The so called 8 megapixels in this CCD are a bit of a joke. There wasn't a huge difference between taking a 3 megapixel pic and stretching up in Photoshop, compared to the same pic at 8 Megapixel. Very soft! diff --git a/SINAI-SA-corpus/3/ref333_rate3.txt b/SINAI-SA-corpus/3/ref333_rate3.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..070c5928dbdb3b65992e34f7de75a11e86b557bd --- /dev/null +++ b/SINAI-SA-corpus/3/ref333_rate3.txt @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ + Canon A590IS - Possibly Good Camera With Some Flaws, January 31, 2009 + ByJWCPA - See all my reviews +I would rate this camera only as average at this time because of the battery problems outlined below. Have not used the camera enough to rate the quality of the photos, features, and general operation at this time. Also, the included SD card with the camera was a measly 32 MB, basically nothing in this day and age of large image files and cheap memory. To get decent photos capacity and a spare, I bought two on-sale Kingston 2 GB SD cards, one from Meritline.com for ca. $7 (free shipping) and one locally at Inkspot for ca. $5. My advice to others is that if you suspect your camera has a problem not due to your use/handling and the camera is still under warranty; return it ASAP to Canon for repairs. I bought camera early last December as a Christmas present, from Amazon since it seem to have the best price at the time including free shipping. Selected this camera model based on Consumer Reports' recommendation, mostly favorable user reviews on Amazon and some ther websites, and the camera price and features. I was a bit concerned about some reviewers complaining of low battery life, but thought perhaps they were a small minority, maybe their problems were due to the way some used thier cameras/settings, and there's always a few lemons sold in any product line. 2. The camera out of the box seemed to be functional for all the features I tested, but after playing with the camera to learn how to use it, and a few dozen shots, the low battery inidcation came on. after a few number more shots (est. a few dozen), the battery replace indication came on and the camera shut down. These were the Panasonic alkaline AA batteries that came with the camera. At this time my voltmeter measured the batteries at ca. 1.35v. 3. To reduce power use, changed some settings to turn LCD off after a short time, and the IS (Image Stabilization) from always on to on only during shots. Put in new Berkley look at the bottom part of the page for links to "Repair Request" or "Repair perhaps they're addressing the manual focus mode that I did not test. 5. After I received the camera back from Canon, I put in the original used Panasonic and BJ's akalines (approx. 1.35v and 1.45v, respectively, similar to as previously measured), and still got the low battery indication with both sets. 6. Decided to put in a new set of BJ's alkalines, measured at ca. 1.59V. Camera set for AUTO mode, IS on only during shots, face detection on. Occasionally used the zoom feature, once or twice for every 25 set of shots. - After 100 shots in succession, most with flash used, battery voltage checked to be ca. 1.43v. - After 32 more shots, low battery indication came on, did 12 more shots, turned camera off, batteries checked at ca. 1.35v - When camera turned back on, low battery indication not on, but came on again after 5 shots. When got up to 191 shots total, camera to off, batteries checked to be ca. 1.38v. - Turn camera back on, low battery indication on again after 13 shots, camera off, checked batteries at ca. 1.34v. - At 204 total shots with the set of new BJ's alkalines, the battery replace indication came on, and the camera shut down shortly after. Can turn on camera again of 2-3 shots before the replace indication/shutdown occurs again. The number of shots here appears to match the camera manual specification page that list ca. 200 shots for akaline batteries. 7. For the second set of testing, I used a fully charged set of Ultra Pro NiMH 2500 mAH-rated AA batteries (ca. 1.43v - 1.45v measured). Made all shots indoors, those where flash used were of house interior, those without flash used was through window (daylight). - Erased all the previous 217 images from the SD card. - After 150 shots, half with flash, half without, no low battery indication, turned camera off for ca. 45 min. for lunch. - When camera turned back on, low battery indication showed, camera off, checked batteries at ca. 1.33v. - When camera turned on, no low battery indication showed, but indication showed again after 23 shots using flash, continued to 25 shots using flash. - Continued shooting 25 shots at a time alternating between flash and no flash, for 175 more shots. After a total of 350 shots (half with flash) have been taken with the NiMH batteries, batteries measured ca 1.27 - 1.29v. - Continued shooting 25 shots at a time alternating between flash and no flash, for 150 more shots. After a total of 500 shots (half with flash) have been taken with the NiMH batteries, batteries measured ca 1.26 - 1.27v now. At this point, I gave up test shooting, as I have not seen the battery replacement indication after 500 shots. The number of shots here appears to in line with the camera manual specification page that list "approx. 450 images" for NiMH batteries. Fooled around for few more test photos, and the battery replace indication/camera shutdown occurred after ca. dozen flash shots past 500. 8. Some observations about the camera: - It looks like I'll have to accept the low battery indication on most of the time. My guess is that there some kind of design and/or manufacturing defect where the camera electronics/software does not accurately detect how much of the battery capacity is remaining. Judging from the various user reviews, it may not be present in all sold units of this model, as not everyone sees this problem. However, if the camera can perform OK for several hundred shots until the battery replacement indication/shutdown (esp. with NiMH which I want to use), I can live with that. - The flash can take more than 5 sec. to recover for the next flash shot. - The camera seems to work differently on alkalines vs. NiMH 2500 mAH-rated rechargables, as it continues working at lower voltage for rechargables. I know that the discharge curves, and capacity and voltage ratings for the alkalines and NiMH batteries are different, the alkaline are rated at 1.5v (actual ca. 1.6v new), and rated capacities numbers can be similar to the NiMH (over 2500 mAH). The NiMH batteries are rated at 1.2v (actual ca. 1.4v new), capacities can be vary (typ.1000-2800 mAH). The initial voltage of both battery types drops fairly quickly from their nominal ratings during use but after the initial drop, the NiMH types tend to have a flatter voltage vs. use time curves than the alkalines. - Since battery monitors typically can only see voltage as an indirect measure of capacity remaining, why should the camera decide that the lower NiMH battery voltage is still OK, while a higher voltage on the alkalines is not? If the alkalines and NiMH rated capacities can be simialr, why don't they perform similarly, or are the alkaline capacity ratings done differently than the NIMH? Canon's camera documentation implies the camera treats the battery types differently as it explicitly notes the performance difference in their camera spec. for nominal number of shots for alkalines vs. NiMH batteries. My Internet research also seems to indicate that the battery rating numbers may or may not all be done via a standard method, and different manufacturers' batteries can perform significantly differently under the same conditions, so as to make the capacity ratings less than useful. diff --git a/SINAI-SA-corpus/3/ref429_rate3.txt b/SINAI-SA-corpus/3/ref429_rate3.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..ea19b69693ed670c526259b454c994212f4efd6e --- /dev/null +++ b/SINAI-SA-corpus/3/ref429_rate3.txt @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ + This camera will not run with rechargable batteries!, February 7, 2007 + ByJack Buffington (California) - See all my reviews +I just bought this camera and was extremely dissappointed to find out that it will only run using alkaline batteries. Fully charged NIMH batteries will cause it to start extending the lens and then shut down with it half way out. This is completely unacceptable. Because of its high 'dead' battery voltage, you aren't able to fully use alkalines either. They are still quite useable in other things when this camera says they are dead. Besides this problem though, this camera has a lot of nice features. I am happy with everything else. Just the same, I wouldn't have bought this camera if I had realized how bad its power problems are. diff --git a/SINAI-SA-corpus/3/ref433_rate3.txt b/SINAI-SA-corpus/3/ref433_rate3.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..7aa484aa8068f2e4a8a1de6ef0b57cdca87438c5 --- /dev/null +++ b/SINAI-SA-corpus/3/ref433_rate3.txt @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ + canon powershot A630, March 10, 2008 + ByJ. Simons (Georgia) - See all my reviews +I have been very pleased with the pictures I've taken with this camera as far as outdoor still-life (flowers, ...). However, in low-light, it is very difficult to get a good shot. With flash, the color is off, with no flash, it is extremely blurry every time. But, takes pretty decent video and seems to hold battery charge pretty well. diff --git a/SINAI-SA-corpus/3/ref477_rate3.txt b/SINAI-SA-corpus/3/ref477_rate3.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..213942fcc570dff2314d3e5dbf1b8134973eb8ae --- /dev/null +++ b/SINAI-SA-corpus/3/ref477_rate3.txt @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ + What is wrong with movies?, January 20, 2007 + ByR. Lefever - See all my reviews +Has anyone else had this problem?.....I have an A620 and just got the A630. When taking movies with the new A630, there are a lot more rolling lines and "screen" effect than is with the A620, especially in the edges of objects. This is in the 640 x 480 mode at 30 fps. (most popular shooting mode) The movie quality should be at least as good in the A630 as it was in the A620, rather than objects looking like they are moving around and "rolling" the peppermint twist. Otherwise, I would have given this camera 5 stars. This is a lot less of a problem in my A620. diff --git a/SINAI-SA-corpus/3/ref480_rate3.txt b/SINAI-SA-corpus/3/ref480_rate3.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..29e8fae825f289ddafc10dd81bf70bdfb4c6740f --- /dev/null +++ b/SINAI-SA-corpus/3/ref480_rate3.txt @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ + An average camera, January 20, 2007 + Bymabinmaui (Austin, TX) - See all my reviews +I had this camera for several months, and the results are mixed. Sometimes I am very pleased with the photos, but other times they come out very blury, especially under low lighting. Sure, a tripod helps and many of the manual controls help, but I am mostly interested in taking pics of my kids, which requires a camera to snap descent pics w/o all the hassle. In the end I decided on a higher-end camera with optical stabilization --- Canon S3 and have been very satisfied with it. All the research in the world can still lead you to the wrong camera... in the end what matters is a retailer with a generous return policy. diff --git a/SINAI-SA-corpus/3/ref481_rate3.txt b/SINAI-SA-corpus/3/ref481_rate3.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..c12e8127f45c62fad7b488b3beade51586633336 --- /dev/null +++ b/SINAI-SA-corpus/3/ref481_rate3.txt @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ + Camera not bad. Customer service? Not good., June 16, 2008 + ByS. Hagood (Bridgeport, Ohio) - See all my reviews +Back in January, after owning my Canon PowerShot A630 for about a month, the camera began not focusing in Portrait mode. The only way I could get it to work was to push extremely hard on the shutter button and it was as if it pushed something back into place. Since my camera was new I called up Canon, sent the camera to them to repair, and waited. Now, I've owned digital cameras from the time they were 1 megapixel. First a Kodak, then two Olympus, then the Canon. The only reason I got the Canon is because my Olympus cost over $1000 and the smaller camera was easier to take to places where I might get knocked around (concerts, moshpits, etc.). And I liked the cool flip screen. They sent my camera back with the problem undiagnosed, stating they cleaned it. They also stated that the camera had damage. It didn't have ANY. Fast forward, and I'm at a friend's house and I drop my camera out of my hand onto the coffee table, leaves a few dents on the case. My camera had STILL been not focusing, but I had found a quick fix - slam the bottom of it on a flat surface and it worked. Feeling that I shouldn't have paid $300 for a camera with a problem, I contact Canon again. I tell them that when I sent my camera in that it had NO damage, and the document I received back said that it did. Now that the camera had damage, my fear was that they would blame me for the malfunctioning focus, and make me pay for the repairs. I got back a form email telling me to send the camera to them. Uhm... no. I call them today and talk to someone explaining why I didn't want to send the camera back, just to see if they would simply offer to send me a replacement camera. Nope! They said that I could send it back to them at their expense, but they wouldn't know anything about the repairs until they were able to look at it. They already DID! So now they want to look at it and see if the new damage negates the old problem? When I looked up the problem in the database originally it didn't even give a diagnosis, it just said to send it to them for repair, so I assumed they knew what the issue was. Waste of my time and money buying this camera. And the amusing thing is that I told them I'll never buy another Canon camera and they seemed to not care. Why should they? Camera is paid for! I will never purchase another Canon camera. diff --git a/SINAI-SA-corpus/3/ref489_rate3.txt b/SINAI-SA-corpus/3/ref489_rate3.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..dad9e7fa4d80b5da8ea24ae04e37ffeb6ca225ad --- /dev/null +++ b/SINAI-SA-corpus/3/ref489_rate3.txt @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ + ISO 200 and above too noisy, January 18, 2009 + ByPhotological - See all my reviews +Sometimes I wonder if someone slipped me the wrong camera. My Canon A95 was such a wonderful thing; flip and turn LCD screen, good clear shots, relatively fast speed (2.8), great for macros. But somewhere, the A630 just leaves me missing my A95 (the first camera met a salty demise in one of those camera "baggies" in the Gulf of Mexico looking for jewfish). First I'll tell you what I did find to be pros about the camera: -Flip and turn lcd - big and it FLIPS AND TURNS. Very nice for macros and sneaky shots. -Quick shutter button reaction - you don't have to wait forever between pushing the shutter and actually taking the picture. It's almost instantaneously in my experience. -You can use accessories with it - buy an off brand extension and you can put polarizing filters (i highly recommend this), a Cokin set with a ND graduated filter and your landscape or sunrise/set shots will suddenly get much greater. Even without anything on the extension, it acts like a hood and keeps glare from marring a shot. -This is my camera of choice for macros and infrared shots (using a filter). You can get millimeters away from things. It's amazing. It's like having a microscope with 100x magnifier. And my main camera (an EOS digital Canon camera) doesn't have the advantage of actually seeing through the infrared filter (which is a deep red/almost black), so it's difficult to frame shots. The A630 lets you see through the filter on the LCD screen. Now, the not so hot; -You're limited in the use of your ISO. Anything over 200 is unusable in my opinion (and 200 is not that hot either). Any ISO under 100 is unusable without a tripod or hands of steel. -The size. Not small enough to tuck in your pocket. I really wish it were. This is supposed to be my little camera. -Photo quality. I know this camera should take better pictures than my A95 but I'm just not convinced it does. All in all, get it for a reallyreally good price and you should be happy. :) diff --git a/SINAI-SA-corpus/3/ref496_rate3.txt b/SINAI-SA-corpus/3/ref496_rate3.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..88686df52149e3dbff4149af109141dd14328cd4 --- /dev/null +++ b/SINAI-SA-corpus/3/ref496_rate3.txt @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ + a bit of a disappointment, August 4, 2008 + ByMichel Le - See all my reviews +I'm a graphic designer/art director. I published magazines and books, so photography is a key element of my work. This is my second Canon. I had a G3 that had problems with the lens (it wouldn't extend when powered on), and the screen went black after 2 years! So I got this one, because it was the only point & shoot with a swivel screen, and I wanted to give Canon another chance. I have a same comments as Flaming June. The inside shots were for most of them grainy, on various settings. Also it doesn't have shake control. Lower and cheaper models have it. I also have problems with the flash. Occasionally when I forced flash on, it wouldn't take pictures. Annoying to miss some good shots. The quality of the photos is very good for a P&S, but the top left gets way too blurry. It's fine if there is a non detailed background (ie sky) but it's a disappointment for the rest. The Canon software is good, including the stitching, but I generally end up using Photoshop. My next camera will have a swivel screen, but that won't be a Canon. Looking for THE perfect Christmas present? How about a nice warm children book to read to your kid? The Hawaii Snowman diff --git a/SINAI-SA-corpus/3/ref497_rate3.txt b/SINAI-SA-corpus/3/ref497_rate3.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..6457728544a1bc22c96699b8c4fe553a80c14bc1 --- /dev/null +++ b/SINAI-SA-corpus/3/ref497_rate3.txt @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ + Great camera except for flash problems, July 27, 2008 + ByGS "handyatmusic" (Pensacola, FL) - See all my reviews +We have owned this camera for just under two years. It has lots of powerful features that we've enjoyed using, especially things like timed exposures. We have taken a lot of great pictures with it. However, recently the flash has intermittently stopped working. When trying to take a picture, the symbol for the flash would blink on and off on the screen, and it refused to take the picture unless we turned the flash off. The manual says nothing about what the blinking flash symbol means. At present, the flash works sometimes, but it is no longer synchronized with the shutter. Is this an electronic problem rather than a mechanical problem? Anyway, it sets the shutter speed, etc., based on the presence of the flash, but the flash is early - "flash . . click". So no pictures come out right. Time to get another camera. diff --git a/SINAI-SA-corpus/3/ref4_rate3.txt b/SINAI-SA-corpus/3/ref4_rate3.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..e805466ae00669d3d8f720bc8be16a13b8d17d8b --- /dev/null +++ b/SINAI-SA-corpus/3/ref4_rate3.txt @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ + Nice features but way too much noise, April 4, 2008 + Bythe engineer-historian - See all my reviews +I bought the A590 as a camera to keep with me in the book bag/briefcase that I carry around most every weekday. You may recall the old saying that the camera you have with you (when you see a photo op) is your best camera. The A590 fills that role by virtue of its small size combined with full exposure control. The big problem is that the noise generated by putting 8 mpix on a tiny (1/2.5) sensor chip can overwhelm the image and render detail moot. I use Imagenomic NoiseWare combined with Photoshop Elements to reduce noise and sharpen the image as best I can. If possible I shoot at the lowest ISO setting, 80, which lowers the noise. I never go over ISO 100 if I can help it, and usually at -2/3 on the exposure control. It's much better to have the photo-editing software brighten up the image than the amplifier boosting the signal (and noise) from the sensor. When you play back the image on the camera's LCD, it should look a little dark -- never overly bright (which can also blow out details). Here are two other items about the Canon A-series cameras. My 15 year old son uses a Canon A720 for what are essentially snapshots and is very happy with it. If you don't crop substantially and aren't too picky about sharpness and noise, the camera is quite capable. From what I can tell, the A720 uses the same electronics (including the sensor and image stabilization) as the A590. The A720 has greater zoom capabilities (and hence a different lens system) and is a little bit larger and heavier. If I were going to get just one of these, I would go for the A720 because of the zoom. The second point is that the other camera I frequently use is a Canon A650, and it is far more capable than either the A590 or A720. The A650 has 12 mpix on a larger sensor (1/1.7). Comparing sensor sizes (available at www.dpreview.com/learn/?/key=sensor+sizes) and mpix shows that the A650's sensor has 1.75 times the area as those of the A590 and A720 with only 1.5 times the pix -- hence pix density is lower and the noise generated by the A650 is much better controlled. And because there are more pix, the noise gets smoothed over as a result of more little points covering the same area in the image. (FYI: Greater pix density on a sensor chip creates more noise.) I did a noise and sharpness test with all three of these cameras plus my Nikon D40 DSLR. I set two shoes, one black and one brown (the latter with lots of texture) on a rug, just beside a sunlit spot inside my house. The shoes were well lit but not in direct sun. I shot all of the cameras at 200 ISO (because that is as low as the Nikon would go) and f/5.6, with the exposure control at -2/3 of an f/stop. The results surprised me. For whatever reason, and despite several tries, I could not get the Nikon to focus adequately on the shoes -- this from a distance of about four feet. I know from experience that the Nikon D40, with 6 mpix on a 2/3 sensor (2/3 the size of a standard 35mm film frame) has extremely well controlled noise and excellent sharpness, but the inability to focus here took it out of the comparison. The superiority of the A650 to the A590 and A720 was startling. Keep in mind that I "zoomed" in on the images in Photoshop after I had transferred them to my 24" iMac (a great computer for photo editing). This made different sections of the shoes appear much larger (the laces were really telling), and the 12 mpix A650 (vs. 8 mpix of the others) had more pixes to work with for any particular area I looked at. Nonetheless, the other two cameras had so much noise that the details were overwhelmed and no amount of noise reduction and sharpening could change that. The A650's image was far sharper and clearer. The A650 has one other big advantage so far as I'm concerned and one drawback. The advantage is the articulating LCD, which I find extremely useful for many shots. Yesterday, I had to lay down on the cold, damp ground to get a shot with the A590, but with the A650 I would have put the camera at foot level and looked down into the cocked LCD. That is really nice, almost addicting. However, the A650's drawback is that it's bulky and surprisingly heavy, which is why I don't carry it along all the time. So you pay your money and take your choice -- or, like me, pay your money twice and have it both ways. Remember, the camera that you have with you is the best camera you own -- so think about what size and type of camera you want to carry plus when and how you will use it. For some people, that means owning more than one camera. diff --git a/SINAI-SA-corpus/3/ref512_rate3.txt b/SINAI-SA-corpus/3/ref512_rate3.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..ce4bd08313d3da130ec771aca20b9585a902d9eb --- /dev/null +++ b/SINAI-SA-corpus/3/ref512_rate3.txt @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ + Not what I expected, December 5, 2006 + ByFlaming June (Georgia) - See all my reviews +I currently own a Canon A80 (which I love) and was interested in upgrading to the highly reviewed A630. I received the camera in time for Thanksgiving and took about 200 photos with it in a variety of conditions. Everything was great until I got home and downloaded my photos to the computer. About half of them were blurry... but worse, ALL of my indoor shots had a lot of noise. I took some more test shots, and noticed that the "camera movement" icon came on every time I used the zoom on indoor shots or any time I tried to take an indoor shot without the flash. After calling customer service, I was convinced that I just had a defective camera, so I contacted Amazon and they were wonderful about sending another camera right out. Today I received the second camera. It was no different from the first. I am a point and shoot photographer who is mostly interested in taking photos of my children... so I took a variety of photos using the same settings on both of my cameras (a80 and a630) then downloaded them to my computer for comparison. I even printed out several photos to make sure the problems weren't with my monitor. Outdoor photos were excellent on both, however there was a huge difference inside. In a well lit room with plenty of natural light from outside, the a630 still produced significant noise, while my a80 on the same setting (auto) produced clear noise-free photos. When my toddler was moving, I got mostly blurry photos with the a630 on auto as well as using the "kids and pets" mode, while my a80 produced crisp and clear photos. I love Canon cameras, and this was my 3rd PowerShot. I really expected to love this camera as much as my previous Canons. Now I don't know whether I should even try to find a newer camera, if the inside shots are going to be like this. Things I liked about the a630: LARGE LCD Nice quality movies Scene assists Great outdoor shots Very accurate colors Quick shutter response Things I didn't like about the a630: Poor quality inside shots with lots of noise and blurry results. If I were a pro, I could probably figure out how to use the manual controls to fix my indoor problems... but I'm just a mom who wants some cute photos of her kids, so this didn't work for me. I'm sticking with my slow-but-dependable A80. diff --git a/SINAI-SA-corpus/3/ref521_rate3.txt b/SINAI-SA-corpus/3/ref521_rate3.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..22a28ca9b2905a91ec206dac4471fbd4d20b2a60 --- /dev/null +++ b/SINAI-SA-corpus/3/ref521_rate3.txt @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ + Nice shots, BUT red eye reduction not good, January 2, 2008 + ByLauren V. "Lauren V." (Kendall Park, NJ) - See all my reviews +I have had this camera for several months (my first digital). Overall, the clarity and color of the shots are great. My big complaint is that most of the time the red eye reduction doesn't work, so I waste countless hours with a photo software taking the red eye out. The troubleshooting portion of the manual states that the subject should be looking directly at the red eye lamp. That's not very easy when taking pictures of children. It also recommended brighter lighting which many times a person has no control over, especially if the picture is taken outside at dusk. I had a Ricoh film camera that I loved and the red eye reduction worked everytime. However, that red eye reduction was a flash as bright as the flash itself (rather than a dull lamp) so I used to tell people to wait for the 2nd flash before getting out of the pose. Maybe Canon should improve the technology for its red eye reduction. diff --git a/SINAI-SA-corpus/3/ref575_rate3.txt b/SINAI-SA-corpus/3/ref575_rate3.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..a6da65f3af8430a084c68a6b4cbcba138c8839fb --- /dev/null +++ b/SINAI-SA-corpus/3/ref575_rate3.txt @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ + Canon and Sony do it again! (I'm not saying that's good), December 20, 2006 + ByMiguel Lescano Cornejo (Guayaquil, Ecuador) - See all my reviews +This is my second Canon camera. The first one was a A75, which I bought back in 2004 and which died from the horrible defective Sony sensor (you know, horizontal purple banding) syndrome in the summer of 2006. When time came to buy a new camera, I was at first wary of buying Canon again, but ended up taking the plunge with this A630 before taking a trip to Chile. After all, Sony had said that they had already identified and corrected their mistake. FALSE. Last summer, all of a sudden I noticed that a few pictures revealed a very subtle purple banding on one of the corners. It's been a year since then, and the problem seems to have gone. I really hope Sony kill the sensor problem once and for all, and I look forward to using my A630 for a few more years. By the way, when my A75 died, Canon's representative in Quito, Ecuador did not honor the "free repair" Canon had offered for buyers affected by the sensor problem. They just kept giving me excuse after excuse. So I took it with me to Canon's repair center in Chile, where it got repaired, no questions asked. diff --git a/SINAI-SA-corpus/3/ref578_rate3.txt b/SINAI-SA-corpus/3/ref578_rate3.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..35d43cf1c5f74d2b8b4b0db44e1e5c710c8a2325 --- /dev/null +++ b/SINAI-SA-corpus/3/ref578_rate3.txt @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ + Nice camera, but delays, January 29, 2007 + ByDST (SF) - See all my reviews +It's a good camera, but getting used to the delay (vs. a traditional 35 mm SLR) is still bugging me a month into owning it. I'm sure I can mess with the settings somehow to shorten that, but so far I haven't figured it out. I also get red-eye in my subjects even with red-eye reduction on, unless they look directly into the lens. Both of these things take away some of the spontaneity in picture taking. I would have liked a wider lens and image stabilization, and looked at the Canon SD800, but it wasn't available on amazon when I ordered this one. But since I love the A630's grip and feel (especially the knob at the top with very facile thumb-friendly mode dial), what I lost in wide angle to "hand happiness" is really a toss-up, and I was a little afraid I'd drop the smaller SD800. The LCD & control interfaces are okay, but I wish more of the modes and icons were more intuitive. The screen is bright and clear, especially appreciated when zooming in on playback. Downloading to a Mac is easy as pie and I like Canon's ImageBrowser that came with the A630 much better than iPhoto. diff --git a/SINAI-SA-corpus/3/ref591_rate3.txt b/SINAI-SA-corpus/3/ref591_rate3.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..b967bdd87b7acac95b8425eccfc94b7a8424b98d --- /dev/null +++ b/SINAI-SA-corpus/3/ref591_rate3.txt @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ + manual mode not intuitive, July 13, 2007 + ByRuben Parker - See all my reviews +I like just about everything about this camera except the manual mode. If you never use manual, then you'll LOVE this camera but since I'm a veteran shooter, I find it lacking. It's not intuitive and takes getting used to. Otherwise, a great camera diff --git a/SINAI-SA-corpus/3/ref610_rate3.txt b/SINAI-SA-corpus/3/ref610_rate3.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..0e26fc5e0f3cc86131f36f2025e519e116ddc1cb --- /dev/null +++ b/SINAI-SA-corpus/3/ref610_rate3.txt @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ + Canon PowerShot A630 8MP Digital Camera , August 27, 2007 + ByA. Cameraman "AC" (Birmingham, AL) - See all my reviews +The quality of this product is far inferior to the A95 that I bought about two years ago, so the "upgrade" (in terms of pixels, zoom, and LCD screen size) was a mistake. In particular, the LCD screen does not seem to work consistently and the automatic interchange between portrait and landscape format on screen is annoying. diff --git a/SINAI-SA-corpus/3/ref613_rate3.txt b/SINAI-SA-corpus/3/ref613_rate3.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..3b96f8e57a04c7bb8e699575370b8b5adaeba2f4 --- /dev/null +++ b/SINAI-SA-corpus/3/ref613_rate3.txt @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ + Indoor shots are so grainny, April 7, 2007 + ByLarry Vu - See all my reviews +I bought this camera A630 to upgrade from my old A95 camera. Sport shooting mode is not availble with the new A630 camera unlike the A95. I'm so disappointed with the indoor shots so grainny and poor in details and clarity. New camera suppose to be better than the older ones but unfortunately this is not the case. If you plan to take a lot of indoor shots then you should not buy this camera A630. diff --git a/SINAI-SA-corpus/3/ref615_rate3.txt b/SINAI-SA-corpus/3/ref615_rate3.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..ac5d72b90603e2ace04a9851208a5462daffe031 --- /dev/null +++ b/SINAI-SA-corpus/3/ref615_rate3.txt @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ + You'll want to order an upgraded memory card, December 7, 2007 + ByLynn (Maryland) - See all my reviews +It wasn't clear to me from the product description how inadequate the memory card included with the camera would be. It came with a 16M card that was full after I shot a half-dozen still images. You'll want to order an upgraded card (I went with a 1G SanDisk card) at the same time that you order the camera, otherwise you won't be able to do much with it. Otherwise I've been pretty happy with the camera, although I'm still playing around with different settings, lighting, etc. diff --git a/SINAI-SA-corpus/3/ref616_rate3.txt b/SINAI-SA-corpus/3/ref616_rate3.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..c139f8e337e68bd440172a3c8ed6bedb21d67a63 --- /dev/null +++ b/SINAI-SA-corpus/3/ref616_rate3.txt @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ + Just too bulky for me, December 2, 2007 + A Kid's Review +This camera is great for someone that doesn't mind bulk. It has a lot of great functions and features and the pictures a pretty clear. It was just too big for me, I had to return it. diff --git a/SINAI-SA-corpus/3/ref619_rate3.txt b/SINAI-SA-corpus/3/ref619_rate3.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..4978ca66d9149af3b9b272271cd3971400b7a88f --- /dev/null +++ b/SINAI-SA-corpus/3/ref619_rate3.txt @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ + Good, but not what I expected, November 7, 2007 + ByR. W. Taylor - See all my reviews +I bought this camera expecting great things. I do like it but there are a couple things I feel I should mention. When using the zoom, especially to get close pictures of small objects, you must hold the camera exceptionally still or the picture turns out blurred. I didn't think that would be a problem since I am used to using non digital cameras with telephoto lenses. I was wrong. Apparently this camera requires a tripod for I have yet to get a good picture when using a great deal of zoom. The other thing I felt I should mention is if you are shooting a picture through a window the color turns out faded and drab even if there is no reflection. Like I said I do like this camera, but it is not the wonder I expected. diff --git a/SINAI-SA-corpus/3/ref708_rate3.txt b/SINAI-SA-corpus/3/ref708_rate3.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..3e69785a205f0e35b8db13b3d2cea5a8c8aab3ad --- /dev/null +++ b/SINAI-SA-corpus/3/ref708_rate3.txt @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ + Decent, April 27, 2008 + ByJ. Speights "cd fiend" (Seattle, WA, USA) - See all my reviews +The image stabilization and the face detection work well, and most images come out wonderfully. There is a noticeable issue with noise and fast moving subjects are still an issue for me. One is common in ultra compacts and one may simply require another round with the manual so take that for what it's worth. I found the menu and settings to be usable, but the settings I want are sometimes buried on a third level. Sometimes menu response has lagged a bit, which can be frustrating when your subject is moving faster than you are. I moved from a Canon SD20 so having an optical zoom is wonderful. Plus, this camera is not that much larger than the SD20 so I still feel like I will take it out with me without worrying about bulk. Battery life seems fine so far...much better than the SD which only holds a few minutes charge these days, despite having replaced the battery. The SD1100 seems to do a decent job overall and overcomes the photographic failures of it's operator (what do I know). If you want a simple point and shoot, you could do much worse. If you want more manual control over your pics, really good low light performance or something to document your next roller derby match, this may not be ideal. diff --git a/SINAI-SA-corpus/3/ref718_rate3.txt b/SINAI-SA-corpus/3/ref718_rate3.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..3e69785a205f0e35b8db13b3d2cea5a8c8aab3ad --- /dev/null +++ b/SINAI-SA-corpus/3/ref718_rate3.txt @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ + Decent, April 27, 2008 + ByJ. Speights "cd fiend" (Seattle, WA, USA) - See all my reviews +The image stabilization and the face detection work well, and most images come out wonderfully. There is a noticeable issue with noise and fast moving subjects are still an issue for me. One is common in ultra compacts and one may simply require another round with the manual so take that for what it's worth. I found the menu and settings to be usable, but the settings I want are sometimes buried on a third level. Sometimes menu response has lagged a bit, which can be frustrating when your subject is moving faster than you are. I moved from a Canon SD20 so having an optical zoom is wonderful. Plus, this camera is not that much larger than the SD20 so I still feel like I will take it out with me without worrying about bulk. Battery life seems fine so far...much better than the SD which only holds a few minutes charge these days, despite having replaced the battery. The SD1100 seems to do a decent job overall and overcomes the photographic failures of it's operator (what do I know). If you want a simple point and shoot, you could do much worse. If you want more manual control over your pics, really good low light performance or something to document your next roller derby match, this may not be ideal. diff --git a/SINAI-SA-corpus/3/ref728_rate3.txt b/SINAI-SA-corpus/3/ref728_rate3.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..3e69785a205f0e35b8db13b3d2cea5a8c8aab3ad --- /dev/null +++ b/SINAI-SA-corpus/3/ref728_rate3.txt @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ + Decent, April 27, 2008 + ByJ. Speights "cd fiend" (Seattle, WA, USA) - See all my reviews +The image stabilization and the face detection work well, and most images come out wonderfully. There is a noticeable issue with noise and fast moving subjects are still an issue for me. One is common in ultra compacts and one may simply require another round with the manual so take that for what it's worth. I found the menu and settings to be usable, but the settings I want are sometimes buried on a third level. Sometimes menu response has lagged a bit, which can be frustrating when your subject is moving faster than you are. I moved from a Canon SD20 so having an optical zoom is wonderful. Plus, this camera is not that much larger than the SD20 so I still feel like I will take it out with me without worrying about bulk. Battery life seems fine so far...much better than the SD which only holds a few minutes charge these days, despite having replaced the battery. The SD1100 seems to do a decent job overall and overcomes the photographic failures of it's operator (what do I know). If you want a simple point and shoot, you could do much worse. If you want more manual control over your pics, really good low light performance or something to document your next roller derby match, this may not be ideal. diff --git a/SINAI-SA-corpus/3/ref797_rate3.txt b/SINAI-SA-corpus/3/ref797_rate3.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..27c53aefc7b7cb0bb106a683bcd65d17df8a62c5 --- /dev/null +++ b/SINAI-SA-corpus/3/ref797_rate3.txt @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ + Having some problems with Face Clarity, December 21, 2008 + ByLes Smith - See all my reviews +I am not sure if I am doing something wrong . The faces in an outside picture are not clear as I expected. I tried it with and without face detection. Also, I expected to be able to take pictures in low light, but that does not seem to work well. It has not been the instant gratification I expected, there may be some things I need to learn. I hope that there is nothing wrong with the camera. diff --git a/SINAI-SA-corpus/3/ref837_rate3.txt b/SINAI-SA-corpus/3/ref837_rate3.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..a6df2459681b9d242bf295e50bab2067bf230c46 --- /dev/null +++ b/SINAI-SA-corpus/3/ref837_rate3.txt @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ + Good Results for Its Size, BUT..., September 6, 2008 + ByConfederate (Bethesda, MD) - See all my reviews +This camera is unremarkable in its output, but is rich in features. It makes a good traveling camera, but if you decide on it, I'd set the image compensation to +1. Set at zero, the images tend to lack contrast and rich saturation. This is true with most cameras, both digital and print. The extra boost in exposure fills in shadow detail and boosts color saturation. Owners also should invest in a copy of Adobe Photoshop Elements, if they don't have it already. If you can cart around a slightly bigger camera, it should pay off with better quality photos; but if you want to travel light, this is as good a way as any. diff --git a/SINAI-SA-corpus/3/ref946_rate3.txt b/SINAI-SA-corpus/3/ref946_rate3.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..4da81092abb50b561cf8311aad3b9f30b7abf9de --- /dev/null +++ b/SINAI-SA-corpus/3/ref946_rate3.txt @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ + good camera with short battery life, July 15, 2008 + Bydumb scientist "Yan" (Chicago, IL USA) - See all my reviews +The camera is great, the small size makes it easy to carry it around. Pictures are of good quality. The indoor shooting is too good to compare with my old Sony. My only problem is the battery life is too short. Hope it's just mine. It barely worked for me for a 2-day trip, and we didn't use the flash light a lot. I consider that unacceptable. diff --git a/SINAI-SA-corpus/3/ref966_rate3.txt b/SINAI-SA-corpus/3/ref966_rate3.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..926f58058f5ca311e0a34b99efae525caed5df1b --- /dev/null +++ b/SINAI-SA-corpus/3/ref966_rate3.txt @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ + first one was better, January 8, 2009 + ByE. Bernegger "Ed" (New Jersey) - See all my reviews +I recently purchased this camera for my wife who uses it for her work at the quilt guild. The image projected on the screen, on the back, is of very poor quality vs the last Cannon. You sometimes will see what looks like a faint green fuzzy line running from top to bottom on the screen. We also feel that the picture quality of the shots are not as sharp and clear as the last Cannon we purchased. I'll try another brand when this one quits working. It was a lot cheaper than the last Cannon we purchased in 2004, but most electronic digital cameras have dropped in price. Would choose a different camera if I had to make the choice again. diff --git a/SINAI-SA-corpus/4/ref1001_rate4.txt b/SINAI-SA-corpus/4/ref1001_rate4.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..98690d0782c86fd94609e7c545d82e204a2b423e --- /dev/null +++ b/SINAI-SA-corpus/4/ref1001_rate4.txt @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ + Great little camera, January 6, 2009 + ByFrankie (Atlanta, GA) - See all my reviews +This camera is great overall. Its very small but the pictures come out pretty clear and the shutter time is decent diff --git a/SINAI-SA-corpus/4/ref1005_rate4.txt b/SINAI-SA-corpus/4/ref1005_rate4.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..d0aac9b11e3544cf2cd801aa113d2c623a81b445 --- /dev/null +++ b/SINAI-SA-corpus/4/ref1005_rate4.txt @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ + Canon SD1100, January 6, 2009 + ByAlbert A. Defazio "Al" (Bethany Beach DE) - See all my reviews +Terrific camera. Takes great pictures and is easy to use. Bought it as a Christmas gift for my daughter and it was a big hit. It would be nice if a case was included to keep it in pristine condition when carried in a purse. diff --git a/SINAI-SA-corpus/4/ref1007_rate4.txt b/SINAI-SA-corpus/4/ref1007_rate4.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..a5fb6dec36efb67a50a95ab3930b8510b1ee3fb4 --- /dev/null +++ b/SINAI-SA-corpus/4/ref1007_rate4.txt @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ + Good camera, January 5, 2009 + ByKristen R. Prange (west Tennessee, USA) - See all my reviews +This is a very good camera, takes good clear pictures and I like the display automatically changing depending on which way you hold the camera. one of the best features is the optical viewfinder. This truly comes in handy when the battery power is low. Overall this is an excellent camera. diff --git a/SINAI-SA-corpus/4/ref1010_rate4.txt b/SINAI-SA-corpus/4/ref1010_rate4.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..2cef20e17643531c22ffddf0fdbc63118a7e339f --- /dev/null +++ b/SINAI-SA-corpus/4/ref1010_rate4.txt @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ + Great camera, December 28, 2008 + ByAdam Koch (Sacramento, CA) - See all my reviews +Canon makes great cameras. This is our third one, and it is very user friendly. no complaints diff --git a/SINAI-SA-corpus/4/ref1012_rate4.txt b/SINAI-SA-corpus/4/ref1012_rate4.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..d0c3238502b93f9f1e40c40e4008cd85ad53db11 --- /dev/null +++ b/SINAI-SA-corpus/4/ref1012_rate4.txt @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ + good little camera, December 27, 2008 + ByEddie Bryan "Florida Boy" (Melrose, Fl USA) - See all my reviews +Canon PowerShot SD1100IS 8MP Digital Camera with 3x Optical Image Stabilized Zoom (Silver) The PowerShot is a good little camera. It's only flaw I can see so far is it comes with a rather small 32 MB memory card and I have just ordered a larger 1 GB at $69.99. diff --git a/SINAI-SA-corpus/4/ref1014_rate4.txt b/SINAI-SA-corpus/4/ref1014_rate4.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..521c5fe71aa281a6ab81f890ee555beee36f4cf5 --- /dev/null +++ b/SINAI-SA-corpus/4/ref1014_rate4.txt @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ + Simple and Portable, December 27, 2008 + ByP. Topol (New York, NY) - See all my reviews +For me, just about any camera would be a suitable upgrade. I am replacing a 2004 edition of a Kodak EasyShare LS743. However, the Canon PowerShot SD1100IS exceeds expectations. I tried others in its competitive set (e.g. Nikon, Kodak and Fuji) and although initially the Canon is not the easiest to figure out, the end results are rewarding. The face recognition feature, when activated, really helps improve the clarity of the picture and the image stabilization is a helpful tool. Consumer Reports and the New York Times rated it a best buy and I agree. I am taking less pictures to the get picture results I want. Enjoy. diff --git a/SINAI-SA-corpus/4/ref1019_rate4.txt b/SINAI-SA-corpus/4/ref1019_rate4.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..eb9c6c24a24265772bf2e3aced2666c513fd1d9c --- /dev/null +++ b/SINAI-SA-corpus/4/ref1019_rate4.txt @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ + Very good camera, December 24, 2008 + ByStephen Migliara (Wilmington, NC) - See all my reviews +This camera is very good. You will love it's pictures, and the ease of use. My family has three of the same class camera, and we all love it. diff --git a/SINAI-SA-corpus/4/ref1022_rate4.txt b/SINAI-SA-corpus/4/ref1022_rate4.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..730bf39480cf57a2158571e5bedd64068e23d1a6 --- /dev/null +++ b/SINAI-SA-corpus/4/ref1022_rate4.txt @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ + Canon 1100 IS, December 22, 2008 + ByD. Pequeno (San Diego, CA United States) - See all my reviews +This is my 2nd Canon camera. This model the 1100 IS truly is a wonderfully built and nice looking blue camera that conveniently can be placed in my pants pocket without my really feeling that it is there. I can have it with me all the time. Picture quality is very good. My older Canon SD300 still is a great camera but this one the 1100 IS has many features that my SD 300 does not have. I am very happy with both of them although I am happier with the 1100 IS and would gladly recommend it. Buying it from Amazon was the best deal and the delivery was fast. I always check with Amazon for priceing, and also read the reviews from others to determine how good a product is. I initially heard of this model from Consumer Reports and read their very positive rating on this model camera. The price from Amazon was better than ebay and Costco! diff --git a/SINAI-SA-corpus/4/ref1026_rate4.txt b/SINAI-SA-corpus/4/ref1026_rate4.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..889c2ed5768034820b30d8126b11576e68ced4da --- /dev/null +++ b/SINAI-SA-corpus/4/ref1026_rate4.txt @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ + excellent little camera, December 22, 2008 + Bylho - See all my reviews +I purchased this camera to take with me on a trip to the Bahamas primarily because I wanted something very compact that I could slip in my purse or pocket, so that I would always have it with me. This little camera definitely has exceeded my expectations, it takes beautiful shots and is almost as small as my cell phone. Very nice. would highly recommend. diff --git a/SINAI-SA-corpus/4/ref1032_rate4.txt b/SINAI-SA-corpus/4/ref1032_rate4.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..ba985a3be5a09b918b651f4277efb3969ade2952 --- /dev/null +++ b/SINAI-SA-corpus/4/ref1032_rate4.txt @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ + nice little camera, December 20, 2008 + ByK. Wang (NY, USA) - See all my reviews +It works perfectly fine so far, and small and handy. It's a good choice for casual photographing for this price. Like it a lot. diff --git a/SINAI-SA-corpus/4/ref103_rate4.txt b/SINAI-SA-corpus/4/ref103_rate4.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..5a0386234815a74c7098fd4c7abc7a69e239b4a5 --- /dev/null +++ b/SINAI-SA-corpus/4/ref103_rate4.txt @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ + LOVE this camera, December 28, 2008 + ByCrystal A. Fehl (NJ) - See all my reviews +This camera is great. Great price too. I wanted a good camera at a reasonable price and this camera did not disappoint. I just wish it came with a case to store the camera in. diff --git a/SINAI-SA-corpus/4/ref1042_rate4.txt b/SINAI-SA-corpus/4/ref1042_rate4.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..9c68087b99e050372a2724b5b7b654b8435c5bc8 --- /dev/null +++ b/SINAI-SA-corpus/4/ref1042_rate4.txt @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ + It's ok, December 16, 2008 + ByMommy to be (Missouri) - See all my reviews +This product is OK. It's not what i expected, it does take good quality pics and will serve the purpose we are wanting it for, but i was a little dissapointed for the price i paid. Maybe i just haven't figured out all the 'gadgets' on it yet. But when i call customer service for help, they are NO help AT ALL and sound just as clueless as me! diff --git a/SINAI-SA-corpus/4/ref1045_rate4.txt b/SINAI-SA-corpus/4/ref1045_rate4.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..9fa38107cb78d79db6e13443164f182530e5f919 --- /dev/null +++ b/SINAI-SA-corpus/4/ref1045_rate4.txt @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ + Canon 1100IS, December 16, 2008 + ByDavid A. Assad "The Bandit" (Salisbury, MA) - See all my reviews +Camera has so far performed very well. Only complaint I have is it is a bit to expensive and the quality is not so great. diff --git a/SINAI-SA-corpus/4/ref1053_rate4.txt b/SINAI-SA-corpus/4/ref1053_rate4.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..c75b0f4eb16327a7b6fd13eb25fc4cc2dd512786 --- /dev/null +++ b/SINAI-SA-corpus/4/ref1053_rate4.txt @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ + Canon SD1100 excellent camera, May 9, 2008 + ByRainer Schulz "photo aficionado" (SFO, CA USA) - See all my reviews +The SD1100 is an excellent camera for everyday use. High quality pictures are easily obtained with image stabilization. Flash is also sufficient, but not great. The optical viewfinder is not very useful, but when exterior light makes the LCD impossible to see, the viewfinder will do. diff --git a/SINAI-SA-corpus/4/ref1054_rate4.txt b/SINAI-SA-corpus/4/ref1054_rate4.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..33653d93a53e7a76f1c28422bb8d3ab51307fdfd --- /dev/null +++ b/SINAI-SA-corpus/4/ref1054_rate4.txt @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ + Good little camera, May 4, 2008 + ByN. Scott Brown (Houston, TX USA) - See all my reviews +I bought this camera for my wife who doesn't like complicated devices. So far, she has been happy with it. It is a little small to hold, but we have managed. I especially like the color highlight feature, but I believe it is a novelty that might seldom get used. We plan to use the camera on safari this summer - to capture close-up shots when my SLR has a long lens on it. diff --git a/SINAI-SA-corpus/4/ref1056_rate4.txt b/SINAI-SA-corpus/4/ref1056_rate4.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..ba3d0203c34657b3b8a743638d7c685bf8403012 --- /dev/null +++ b/SINAI-SA-corpus/4/ref1056_rate4.txt @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ + Great camera, November 3, 2008 + ByJersey person - See all my reviews +I bought a Canon on recommendation by friends and family who have various Canon "mini" camears (e.g. Powershots, Elphs, etc). I have to say that it's all around great camera that takes high-quality photos in most settings. Even in the darkest settings, the shots come out clear and bright (with flash of course). The only time that the shots don't come out superb is when trying to capture something in lower-light settings from a considerable distance - in this case, the shots come out dark though I think they can be tweaked when downloaded. When you factor the size of the camera and the low price, this camera is a winner all around. diff --git a/SINAI-SA-corpus/4/ref1057_rate4.txt b/SINAI-SA-corpus/4/ref1057_rate4.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..77e56d4aa127365b75663b01bb27cb4692242906 --- /dev/null +++ b/SINAI-SA-corpus/4/ref1057_rate4.txt @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ + Happy and Satisifed. It's a Good On-The-Go Camera, September 26, 2008 + ByClothes Hog "J" (Canada) - See all my reviews +I'm an avid Canon fan and recently purchased this camera (in blue) for it's compact size. I own a 40D which isn't so practical to carry around for everyday use, especially with my battery grip on it! I previously owned (a now ancient) S40 "compact" camera - which in comparison is not-so-compact. The SD1100is is amazingly small and light in weight. It features a viewer which I think will come in handy (and has) in bright light situations where the screen does little or no good. The 2.5" screen is plenty big, although noticeable smaller than the 3" on some of the other models. I think the viewer is worth the small trade off. IS is also an invaluable feature especially with low light situations or non-flash moments. The main issue I have heard of with this series is with potential lens harm if the camera turns on accidentally while in it's case. It's pretty hard to do since Canon has now made this on/off button flush with the body. But, my best advice to avoid this situation is to make sure the camera is in play mode (vs. camera mode) when you put it back in the case. This will prevent the lens from zooming out upon turning on. I'm not really worried - this has not happened to me yet (well, in the month that I've been carrying it around . . . EVERYWHERE!) Navigation is easy to pick up on this one - quite different from my older S40, but easy enough to figure out even without reading the manual. I do suggest buying a spare battery to have on you just in case, especially if you plan on using the video mode (which is really good) since it sucks life quickly from the battery. I also bought a 8GB HCSD card and reader to go with it to make room for quick videos of my kid :-) and pictures, of course. Other than that, it performs like I expected. The flash is not the strongest, but then, it's a pocket camera. If you're looking for more strength from a flash, you'll need to go with external flashing - on a different camera as this one doesn't have that option. Knowing it's limitations, it does the job for the everyday moments when you "wish you had a camera." diff --git a/SINAI-SA-corpus/4/ref1058_rate4.txt b/SINAI-SA-corpus/4/ref1058_rate4.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..15219f503609eb9c7aa1f4a219ae676e5d2942b3 --- /dev/null +++ b/SINAI-SA-corpus/4/ref1058_rate4.txt @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ + An improvement over the SD1000, September 5, 2008 + ByRafael E. Ramirez "Rafaelrsv" (San Salvador, El Salvador) - See all my reviews +I bougth a SD1000 last year for my wife, but our daugther basically take it for herself, so I need to buy another camera for my disatisfied wife. I was happy with the SD1000, so I choose this model thinking it will be more of the same, an I like the new colors too. After some weeks of use, I could say that this is a better camera, it feels more solid, with better materials. The photos are better, not only because of the IS, but with the overall quality (I have made some prints and I think all photos look better). I don't give it 5 stars because of the limited manual controls. It is a very good, may I say excelent, point and shoot, but if your'e interested in experimenting with your photos, you may want to buy another model with more manual controls. diff --git a/SINAI-SA-corpus/4/ref1067_rate4.txt b/SINAI-SA-corpus/4/ref1067_rate4.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..d9ae09430287fc00fd0f7f37fca43445f6c701fb --- /dev/null +++ b/SINAI-SA-corpus/4/ref1067_rate4.txt @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ + good things in small packages, December 6, 2008 + ByA. Tolman "Andy in ME" (Maine) - See all my reviews +This generation Elph has hit a sweet spot: it's about as small as it can get and still have usable controls, and it's minimized some of the limitations of earlier generations: much less shutter lag, and snapshot focus is better with face detection. It takes remarkably good pictures in available light, and is better than most of its size at managing the flash, so that interiors don't look as artificial. It doesn't replace my D-80 for serious photography, but having something that fits in a shirt pocket means getting shots at times when you're not out on a dedicated photography mission. Excellent value. diff --git a/SINAI-SA-corpus/4/ref1074_rate4.txt b/SINAI-SA-corpus/4/ref1074_rate4.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..d928d8c53d696680d8d975276a3d7fa2e1cde415 --- /dev/null +++ b/SINAI-SA-corpus/4/ref1074_rate4.txt @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ + Very Excited About My New Camera, May 27, 2008 + ByT. Besch "tamra_lb" (Houston, TX) - See all my reviews +This is my 3rd Canon camera. I have two small kids. So saying that I take a lot of pictures is an understatement. I love taking pictures and this is a great camera. I searched and reviewed all of the canon cameras very diligently before deciding on this camera. I wanted a Rebel XTI, but it is a little out of my budget right now. I wanted a camera that would take good quality pictures (like for my Alaska Cruise coming up in June) as well as take great pics of my kids. Some of the other canon cameras had features different from this one and I had a hard time deciding. But, this camera was a great choice! This image stabilization is great. It has some great functions for kids, like a continuous shot function. Great for capturing my son hit the ball and run to 1st base. It has this color filter where everything is black and white, except for my sons blue baseball jersey. I have had a good time with this camera so far. Great pictures, neat tools. The technology just keep getting better. A friend of mine got the same camera about the same time I did. Her second Canon camera. She has also had great results. Great camera! diff --git a/SINAI-SA-corpus/4/ref107_rate4.txt b/SINAI-SA-corpus/4/ref107_rate4.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..021476f52ef23293bd42c400dc8eea7dab1a1bc5 --- /dev/null +++ b/SINAI-SA-corpus/4/ref107_rate4.txt @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ + GREAT CAMERA, December 26, 2008 + ByGADGET MAN "G Man" (Bessemer, AL) - See all my reviews +[[ASIN:B0011ZCDKS Canon PowerShot A590IS 8MP Digital Camera with 4x Optical Image Stabilized Zoom]. This is a great camera for the casual user. I bought this camera for my wife and she absolutely loves it! The new "easy function" mode is great! She even commented on how fast the camera takes mulitple shots compared to our old Sony Cybershot. Also, the full price including sh was still $30-40 cheaper on Amazon compared to Circuit City and other electronic stores. We only had one slight drawback, the battery life. We used the AA batteries that came with the camera and after using the camera throughout the day from 10 am till 6 pm the low battery light came on. Fortunatley, we had an extra set of batteries and continued to enjoy taking pictures. Overall, for the price, ease of use, the quality of pictures produce, this is a great camera! Great Buy! Get it and you will love it! diff --git a/SINAI-SA-corpus/4/ref1083_rate4.txt b/SINAI-SA-corpus/4/ref1083_rate4.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..bbb138520e4aa82fbe3982482cf7f5846e08355a --- /dev/null +++ b/SINAI-SA-corpus/4/ref1083_rate4.txt @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ + Perfect Easy-to-Use, Compact Camera, November 24, 2008 + ByGavin Guest (Kansas) - See all my reviews +I bought this camera to take on short trips when my DSLR is too bulky. For me, image quality in a camera like this is less important than ease of use and sheer portability. This PowerShot is exactly what I wanted in a camera like this. The images are nice, the camera is quite small and very light. It is just small enough to comfortably fit into the front pocket of my jeans. The flash and zoom aren't perfect, but this IS a point and shoot camera. I don't have any complaints about the photos from this camera. The rechargeable battery is great and charges quickly. My previous point-and-shoot had a terrible shutter delay. This camera does a nice job of taking the image right when I press the button. It's not quite as responsive as my DSLR, but still very good. This one does take short movies, but the quality is not great. Don't buy this thinking you're going to take lots of home movies. It's good in a pinch or to capture something random, otherwise, skip the movie feature. Recommended for the family on the go. diff --git a/SINAI-SA-corpus/4/ref1084_rate4.txt b/SINAI-SA-corpus/4/ref1084_rate4.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..9afded701f6a6015c10f99930f485ef0767a2471 --- /dev/null +++ b/SINAI-SA-corpus/4/ref1084_rate4.txt @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ + Cannon PowerShot SD1100IS, November 11, 2008 + ByBen (California) - See all my reviews +This is a great little point and shoot. It's small enough to easily fit in a pocket and takes fine pictures. My one gripe is its default to crank up the ISO automatically in low light. Unless you switch to manual mode and specify your desired ISO, the camera will switch to 800 ISO and you'll get a very grainy image (assuming you've turned off the flash). That complaint aside, the camera takes outstanding pictures in daylight, captures good videos, has very good battery life and has places the controls where they're easy and intuitive to access. diff --git a/SINAI-SA-corpus/4/ref1086_rate4.txt b/SINAI-SA-corpus/4/ref1086_rate4.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..7003b3678101fd97baffe42c068690008da4f6a2 --- /dev/null +++ b/SINAI-SA-corpus/4/ref1086_rate4.txt @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ + A superb take-along camera with all sorts of bells and whistles, September 24, 2008 + ByPhyllis Neumann (San Francisco Bay Area) - See all my reviews +I already own a Canon XT, which I love, but I found that, because of its size I never took it along with me all the time and missed some great shots. So I bought the Canon SD1100IS to take with me all the time. I love this little camera. It's easy to hold, has more bells and whistles than the XT and takes great photos. I also love the movie clip feature and the large LCD screen (which I miss in the XT). I bought a case for it with a neck strap so that I don't have to carry it when I'm empty-handed. The downside of the camera is that I'm used to having an SLR with virtually no shutter lag, so it's hard to go back to having a camera with it. That means that I have to be careful when shooting moving objects so that they're always in the photo (which sometimes becomes an interesting dilemma). Although the camera has a slow shutter speed setting you can't really adjust the shutter speed. There are set features for kids and pets, night shots, foliage and even fireworks, but you're pretty locked into the shutter speed they select. That said, the camera performs beautifully and takes great photos, equal to that of the XT. A great buy for the money! diff --git a/SINAI-SA-corpus/4/ref1089_rate4.txt b/SINAI-SA-corpus/4/ref1089_rate4.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..9b0feeab731c80f39e67d8b18d0365cb9f3588ab --- /dev/null +++ b/SINAI-SA-corpus/4/ref1089_rate4.txt @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ + Lots of features in a small package, July 6, 2008 + ByD. Pitman - See all my reviews +I did extensive research prior to selecting the PowerShot SD1100IS. My other choices were the new Nikon Coolpix and the Canon 850. My prior camera was a Pentax Optio S. While I own a Nikon SD80 it is large and less likely to be used than the smaller Canon. I wanted a viewfinder and optical image stabilization with face recognition. The new Canon has both. My complaints center around the grainy image on the display prior to taking a picture and the inability to quickly deactivate the flash for taking photos of a distant subject (like a graduation). Otherwise, the Canon packs a lot of features into a small package at a very reasonable price. diff --git a/SINAI-SA-corpus/4/ref110_rate4.txt b/SINAI-SA-corpus/4/ref110_rate4.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..6b4f1adbf3b5e214f39013bd0d57786041c4521f --- /dev/null +++ b/SINAI-SA-corpus/4/ref110_rate4.txt @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ + I'm Happy, August 24, 2008 + ByMolly P. (Portland, Oregon USA) - See all my reviews +I purchased this camera as an upgrade/companion to my Canon Powershot S2IS because I needed a smaller camera to carry in my purse, and the A590IS to be very similar to the S2 -- so I thought I wouldn't have to rely too heavily on the owner's manual to learn how to do everything (this has turned out to be mostly true). The A590IS is superior to the S2 in many ways. It's lighter. It's smaller (about 10% smaller in length and height, and half the size of the S2, depth-wise.) It uses 2 AA batteries instead of 4. It has 8 megapixels instead of 5. Best of all, it doesn't have a separate lens cap that likes to fall off all the time! (It has an automatic lens cover instead.) However, the optical zoom is considerably less on this one (4x instead of 12x) and it's a bit more difficult to take videos (you have to put the camera in video mode with the A590, whereas with the S2 you just had to press the record button.) One thing I really miss on the A590 is the rotateable LCD screen that the S2 had; but I guess if this camera had one of those, it couldn't be as small as it is! One of the reasons I chose this particular camera, as opposed to selecting one of the many other, smaller cameras currently on the market, was that this camera has a viewfinder in addition to the LCD screen. Viewfinders on digital cameras are hard to come by anymore, but they are very useful if you're trying to take a picture when it's bright outside (making the LCD picture almost impossible to see.) Overall, I am happy with the A590IS. I like the fact that it's small (by no means the smallest camera on the market, but small enough for my purse or even a coat pocket). I like that it can take good photos in many different conditions. I am most impressed with its ability to get good shots outside at night, even without the flash. I took a photo of some friends in front of a Ferris wheel at the fair. The sun had just set, so the sky was dark, and while there were lights around from the rides, the lighting conditions weren't ideal. The photo still came out beautiful and bright, with the lights from the Ferris wheel noticeable, yet my friends weren't washed out or too dark in the photo. I also took "experimental" shots of the different rides at the fair. Depending on which mode I used, I could either get a clean shot of a lit-up ride with the black sky in the background, or I could get an "artsy" shot (while the ride was moving) using a setting where the shutter was a bit slower. A few cons: The battery life isn't anything to write home about; I had to change the batteries twice during a recent 5-day vacation (to compare, I only had to change the batteries once on a 10-day vacation with the S2 a few years ago.) Also, I still get blurry photos from time to time, for no apparent reason. The subject is still, my hands are steady, and yet photos can still turn out blurry. This can be kind of frustrating. This used to happen with the S2, too, though, so maybe it's just me. If you want the smallest camera on the market, or one with the most megapixels or zoom capabilities, then the A590 may not be for you. If you want a camera that's kind of in the middle of everything (except picture quality), check this one out. For the amount of features it has and the quality of the photos, I think the price is good. diff --git a/SINAI-SA-corpus/4/ref1120_rate4.txt b/SINAI-SA-corpus/4/ref1120_rate4.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..9c75c092f90e2310cdc2eb014ccb7b90ec08c1af --- /dev/null +++ b/SINAI-SA-corpus/4/ref1120_rate4.txt @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ + Love it!, November 24, 2008 + ByH. Bagga (Seattle, WA USA) - See all my reviews +What a great buy! Got a great looking, great functioning camera for a phenomenal price. Have been using it all over the place. The battery life is great. No need to buy any additional lithium batteries. Pic quality is good..prints sharp clear images. Like most other cameras, attempting to take quick back to back pictures seems to freeze and confuse the camera a little bit. But recovery is lightning fast.. within the second. When taking pics in dim light, need to change mode or pics come out dark.Light weight, easy to carry and fashionable. Overall a great buy! diff --git a/SINAI-SA-corpus/4/ref1122_rate4.txt b/SINAI-SA-corpus/4/ref1122_rate4.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..032cec1d05109b6eea4d65bffea1f556ad934392 --- /dev/null +++ b/SINAI-SA-corpus/4/ref1122_rate4.txt @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ + Great camera, great price., November 10, 2008 + ByMeredith S. Sheinfeld (Harrisburg, PA) - See all my reviews +This is a great little camera, style and function. I am a loyal Canon user, I find their products of the highest value. My only negative with this camera is that when taking pictures indoors, they come out dark when set on Auto. I am not a camera expert so I am sure there is a more effective way to take indoor photos, but for now, mine just don't come out great. However, even if I knew that beforehand, I would have bought this camera anyway. I am a satisfied customer. diff --git a/SINAI-SA-corpus/4/ref1124_rate4.txt b/SINAI-SA-corpus/4/ref1124_rate4.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..88e601d9a3a1883bc9e3b59c495e7bf97ecd87d2 --- /dev/null +++ b/SINAI-SA-corpus/4/ref1124_rate4.txt @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ + Nice Canon quality, with a few flaws, October 15, 2008 + ByArvin "AAA" (USA) - See all my reviews +Just got this camera as a supplement for my other Canon, which is too big to just throw in my pocket like this can be. I am very happy with the size, weight, and images so far.I would say it is the same size and weight as a deck of cards, I might try a card case as my camera case! The materials of this camera are very nice, with only a few problems for me right now. The entire case is made of metal, except the battery cover and cable port cover. I think the battery cover should have been made of metal also for durability, and it is a bit weak in holding it shut; seems like it will be easy to open it accidentally, but the battery is held inside with a notch, so its just annoying for now. And on the front, it would have been nice if the silver rings that make up the lens assembly were a matte finish instead of glossy to match the rest of the camera. Flash works good, 2-3 sec btwn shots, and 1 sec startup time, so fast! Otherwise, I look forward to using this little toy for some great snapshots. Will update in the future. diff --git a/SINAI-SA-corpus/4/ref1134_rate4.txt b/SINAI-SA-corpus/4/ref1134_rate4.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..896e9fc75164a300ba42d3462e732e6063f0a609 --- /dev/null +++ b/SINAI-SA-corpus/4/ref1134_rate4.txt @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ + Great Camera for the Price!, June 1, 2005 + ByHIPPY MAC - See all my reviews +I just brought this camera a few weeks ago. I took it on a trip this Memorial weekend and the pictures came out beautiful. I love the close-up mode and the sports mode the best. The night mode is also very good (which surprised me). I also like the fact that this camera allows you to review the pictures and zoom in and out when doing so. I did not like the auto mode at all. The landscape mode took pretty good pictures. When I viewed them I thought they weren't good, but when I reviwed them online they were beautiful like postcards. I also like the video capability. When I first got the camera, I did a little home video walking around the house and talking and when I uploaded it on the computer it was sharp and very clear. It also played back well on the camera. This camera is worth the price. Like the other reviewers I recommend any buyer to purchase rechargeable batteries. diff --git a/SINAI-SA-corpus/4/ref1140_rate4.txt b/SINAI-SA-corpus/4/ref1140_rate4.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..a77d6d9c10ceb0babc5262dd5c2360672b509b8b --- /dev/null +++ b/SINAI-SA-corpus/4/ref1140_rate4.txt @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ + Good Quality Low to Mid Range Camera for Anyone, January 3, 2005 + ByR. Kirkham "jrkirkham" (Rushville, Illinois USA) - See all my reviews +I've photographed weddings and like to play with special features on my cameras. This unit has enough gadgets to impress me. I am also impressed by it's workmanship. My wife likes to just point and shoot. She is a teacher and likes to keep the docking printer in her classroom. The camera is simple enough for her needs, yet has a better quality picture than some of the other cheaper models we looked at. I looked a long time for a low cost easy to use camera with more advanced features than normal. I'm not sorry I chose this one. diff --git a/SINAI-SA-corpus/4/ref1141_rate4.txt b/SINAI-SA-corpus/4/ref1141_rate4.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..9373d385129736cf1926712d81553eba80e60581 --- /dev/null +++ b/SINAI-SA-corpus/4/ref1141_rate4.txt @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ + Very easy to use 1st digital camera, June 29, 2005 + ByChip L "chip1978" (Little Rock, AR) - See all my reviews +When I got this camera out of the box, I was taking pictures in minutes without even reading the instructions. Don't get me wrong, I'll have to review the manual to do rapid series shots, night shots, or other shots that might be difficult. So far, it's been incredibly easy to use and very intuitive. I'll echo the concern of at least one other reviewer - I strongly recommend against installing the Kodak software. You should have no problem simply connecting the camera to a USB port and transferring images and video. After installing Kodak's software, my computer crashed. diff --git a/SINAI-SA-corpus/4/ref1146_rate4.txt b/SINAI-SA-corpus/4/ref1146_rate4.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..6dd881633610385a3643d972ad1b48a4a387b571 --- /dev/null +++ b/SINAI-SA-corpus/4/ref1146_rate4.txt @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ + Good Camera, but Battery runs out quickly, and not alot of space to store pictures, October 30, 2005 + ByMeg "canadianrosee" (Canada) - See all my reviews +Several people in my family have this digital camera, and they have worked for many years. We've taken this camera to the beach, camping, on road trips, to relative's houses; you name it. It has many fine points about it. If you are taking pictures at night, you can flip the stitch on the camera to 'night'; ect. This camera seems durable enough and has a video screen built into it so you can film as well.. (although it only works for a few minutes). Though this camera has several good points, there are bad things about it too, that i should mention. There isn't alot of storage space on it, which means you have to transfer the pictures onto a computer or lap top, which is hard to do if you are on the road or camping or anything like that. Also, the battery runs out easily, and if it is on when you are using it, the front of the camera will stay open, and there is no way to close it until you get another battery. The camera is really nice, and overall, i beleive it deserves four stars. One of our camera's came with a black & red camera case. diff --git a/SINAI-SA-corpus/4/ref1151_rate4.txt b/SINAI-SA-corpus/4/ref1151_rate4.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..9e4633da8a4d13a15e21a9f774150f3004c529d3 --- /dev/null +++ b/SINAI-SA-corpus/4/ref1151_rate4.txt @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ + Good camera, November 26, 2005 + BySrivastava (Hyderabad) - See all my reviews +I have this camera. Its very useful to take short movies and the picture clarity is very good. The USB option make its very easy for transefering the photos on to your PC and delete the pics that you dont like. The only thing i dislike is that batteries wont last for long. They would go out say in couple of hours. Overall the performance is good. diff --git a/SINAI-SA-corpus/4/ref1153_rate4.txt b/SINAI-SA-corpus/4/ref1153_rate4.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..847969cff8a60bf35b9e41c9c540668e57f19aef --- /dev/null +++ b/SINAI-SA-corpus/4/ref1153_rate4.txt @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ + Great camera, poor customer service, July 12, 2004 + ByJennifer (Seattle, WA) - See all my reviews +I love my kodak easy share camera. It is a good camera for the price. However, just a warning, if you have a problem with your camera, kodak has very poor customer service and is unwilling to help you fix your problem. You will have to take care of it on your own at a local dealership. diff --git a/SINAI-SA-corpus/4/ref1159_rate4.txt b/SINAI-SA-corpus/4/ref1159_rate4.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..c0398dc48aebfd5301d7cdbaac617f8700fe6aaa --- /dev/null +++ b/SINAI-SA-corpus/4/ref1159_rate4.txt @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ + It works for me!, December 8, 2004 + ByJ. Bradley (Texas) - See all my reviews +This camera is great for my needs. I needed a camera which makes good 8 X 10's and this one does. I wanted to take some sound movies and this one takes 20 FPS videos. I tried the Kodak 5 mp camera, but it's movies would only work at 15 FPS, and it was a big noticable difference, so I took it back. Yes, it does have a tendency to overexpose, but it's no big deal for me to tweak the exposure. For the price, under 200, it's a real deal. The software is good too, and you don't need Kodak's overpriced dock..just the USB and their Easy Share CD. diff --git a/SINAI-SA-corpus/4/ref115_rate4.txt b/SINAI-SA-corpus/4/ref115_rate4.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..27a68b669a4b34bc2deb56ee51d1d49f45e9d075 --- /dev/null +++ b/SINAI-SA-corpus/4/ref115_rate4.txt @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ + Not Great, Just OK, September 11, 2008 + ByNboroGirl (Boston) - See all my reviews +I purchased this camera about 3 months ago from Amazon, which had the best price. I spent a bit of time learning about the features, trying them out, testing the camera, and finally, USING the camera. All in all I am mostly pleased with this camera. My previous digital camera was an Olympus D550 zoom, which took great pictures and was very easy to use. The Canon camera is also easy to use, if you want to keep it in AUTO mode, which I often do. If you want to use a different mode or change one of the settings, there are so many different combinations and possibilities that I find it can be a bit overwhelming. I think I just need to get used to it more. I thought I was pretty proficient with it at first, but if I don't use it frequently and consistently, I tend to forget which menu the feature I'm looking for is on. One thing I really like about this camera is the feel of it in my hands. I was torn between one of the smaller Camera SD models and this one, but the A590 felt so good and comfortable in my hand, I figured it would be easier to hold it steady. (My sister has a Canon SD camera and it is so small, her pictures often come out blurry because she has difficulty holding it steady when she takes a shot.) My old Olympus was much bigger than either camera, so I figured the A590 would be an improvement over it and I shouldn't worry so much about the size. I also liked the idea of having it use AA batteries, vs. the Canon rechargable one in the smaller cameras. (While on vacation, my sister would go to take a picture and lament that her battery needed charging. With AA batteries, if you run out of power, just go buy more.) I am pleased with the photos I have taken so far, for the most part. It does not do well outdoors at dusk, but my Olympus didn't, either, and I suspect more savy users would know what to set to make these kinds of photos come out better. One thing I noticed in a lot of my photos is that if there is a lamp or light near the subject, or if the subject is near a window letting in bright light, you'll get a bright, overexposed area in the photo. I never noticed this problem with my Olympus, and friends/relatives who have taken shots of the same subject with their cameras did not have this problem. For this reason I am taking away one star. One thing I was concerned about after reading a lot of the reviews here was bettery life. I preferred a camera that ran on AA batteries, but not if it was going to eat up batteries. My Olympus ran on 4 AA batteries, so I bought rechargeable ones. The A590 only uses 2 AA batteries, so I figured I'd be changing batteries often. Not so! I started off using the 2 Panasonic batteries that came with the camera. I figured I'd use them up just playing with the camera. I kept turning it on and off as I was reading the manual, trying the different menus and features. Surely they'd be dead in a couple of days. Nope. I took many test shots in different lighting, with different settings, and downloaded them to my laptop. Still the batteries continued working. I took a LOT of photos at my and my husband's anniversary party, when all our relatives came in from out of town, but still the batteries lasted. Then I took the camera on a trip and took many more photos, then a couple of birthdays, then my son's college apartment and STILL the batteries lasted. (I must've taken over 100 photos, not to mention my training sessions). It's been a month since I've used the camera and just now I noticed the low battery warning is coming on, so I replaced the Panasonics with 2 rechargeable batteries. I am happy with my purchase. When I compared photos that I took with my camera with the same photos my relatives took with their digital cameras, many of them much more expensive than my A590, I generally preferred my photos, and at the very least my photos were equally as good. As I mentioned above, the only photos that weren't as good was when there was bright light from a window or lamp near (though not necessarily behind) the subject. UPDATE 12/15/08: The first time I reviewed this camera, I had only used it on a few occasions. I was pretty happy with it at the time. However, it's been six months and the more I use it, the unhappier I become with it. It's enough to make me consider buying a new, different camera. I wonder if it's too late to return it to Amazon. Yes it's easy to use and yes, it has a lot of nice features. But generally it doesn't take very good pictures. Some shots come out very nice - especially ones taken outdoors in full light. But there are too many problems with pictures taken if the light isn't just so. If there is a light on in the background, you get bright halos around the light source. If you use natural light on indoor shots, the colors look washed out. Even indoor shots taken with the flash look washed out. Then there's the problem with batteries. If I buy regular batteries, they seem to last pretty well. If I use chargeable batteries, I get about 2 or 3 shots before the low battery light comes on, and maybe 2 or 3 after that before they need to be replaced. Someone suggested that maybe the problem was with the batteries or my charger, but I didn't have this problem with my old camera, which used the same batteries/charger. The fact that regular batteries last much longer does give merit to this theory. I now give this camera 2.5 stars because of the so-so photos it takes, and the somewhat faded looking colors. If I had to do it again, I would buy a different camera. diff --git a/SINAI-SA-corpus/4/ref116_rate4.txt b/SINAI-SA-corpus/4/ref116_rate4.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..e4b6c3efd218f0b1c27936212ae5e6de42957f8c --- /dev/null +++ b/SINAI-SA-corpus/4/ref116_rate4.txt @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ + Good Camera - Good snapshots, July 22, 2008 + ByBostonAaron (Boston, MA) - See all my reviews +I bought this camera to take with me when my DLSR or my super zoom is just too heavy or too bulky to take along. The old saying is that the best camera for the job, is the camera you have!! I did not wish to spend a lot of money but wanted to still have image stablization, control over exposure and aperture, and decent image quality, all while using SD memory cards since I have many. This camera is a reasonable compromise. The images are acceptably crisp and can be made even sharper in post processing, the manual controls work great, and the size certainly allows me to put it into my pocket. If you are looking for a snapshot camera the Canon A590 can certainly produce the goods. I haven't found the slow recycle time of the flash to be a problem and and the rechargeable NiMH batteries I'm using are still going strong after a couple of hundred pictures with about a third being taken with flash. You can adjust the vividness of the color along with the sharpness and the contrast to taste. The exposures seem accurate and exposure conpensation can be used to help with "blown" skies, a problem with many digital cameras, it seems. Having the memory card located with the batteries certainly saves in manufacturing cost (only a single door) but when I remove the card, sometimes the batteries also fall out, but this isn't really a serious issue - I just have to be careful. I do wish that this camera had a wider angle lens (maybe 24 mm equivalent in 35 mm camera terms) since there are times I want effects that these wide angle lenses produce. Of course I knew that the camera did not do this when I bought it and many casual users would probably not miss this feature unless they previously had a camera that a lens of this type. In summary, given this camera's price point, it's an excellent value. diff --git a/SINAI-SA-corpus/4/ref1171_rate4.txt b/SINAI-SA-corpus/4/ref1171_rate4.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..d7d23ace58668d04710c0353bd5a09a5ccfe8c66 --- /dev/null +++ b/SINAI-SA-corpus/4/ref1171_rate4.txt @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ + Great Digital Camera, September 25, 2005 + ByC. King "New Photographer" (Cleveland, Ohio) - See all my reviews +I love my camera. It has many functions, video, and it is a very nice size. Not too small or too big. It's very great and you can share your pics with others. The picture is so clear it's unreal. I am sure there are better digital cameras out there, but for a person who has never had one and is just getting into picture taking and wants clarity, picture share and even printing from home...this is the one! diff --git a/SINAI-SA-corpus/4/ref1176_rate4.txt b/SINAI-SA-corpus/4/ref1176_rate4.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..b138dae94066deb2fc4324347e7cde816c17ac99 --- /dev/null +++ b/SINAI-SA-corpus/4/ref1176_rate4.txt @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ + Kodak CX7430, June 27, 2004 + ByChristopher Wettach "cmw from rochester" (Rochester, NY United States) - See all my reviews +Although it lacks a German lens, this unit provided crisp clear close-ups. Very easy to use for the most part. Display is bright and menu commands are logically arranged. diff --git a/SINAI-SA-corpus/4/ref1181_rate4.txt b/SINAI-SA-corpus/4/ref1181_rate4.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..7e5f8a34e06f87d2df2e986c7030c2d5ab52edb1 --- /dev/null +++ b/SINAI-SA-corpus/4/ref1181_rate4.txt @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ + A good deal, July 11, 2004 + By A Customer +Pros - Light weight, small, handy, good pic quality and lot of flexibility while shooting. User friendly software. Cons - Rechargable battery and charger should come with the package. diff --git a/SINAI-SA-corpus/4/ref1197_rate4.txt b/SINAI-SA-corpus/4/ref1197_rate4.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..b67b8f0bf2a48e9ed9650f03b5cc3e0d2208e386 --- /dev/null +++ b/SINAI-SA-corpus/4/ref1197_rate4.txt @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ + easy to use, October 22, 2007 + ByD. Moskaluk (CT) - See all my reviews +This camera is tiny enough to fit in your back pocket & you don't have to wait a week & a half after hitting the power button to start shooting. I especially love the anti blur setting as I am usually laughing at my subjects! It's really easy to switch from mode to mode, & the view screen is huge! diff --git a/SINAI-SA-corpus/4/ref11_rate4.txt b/SINAI-SA-corpus/4/ref11_rate4.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..83fb70504ec6d847e0ec218bf8a4e62655c2807d --- /dev/null +++ b/SINAI-SA-corpus/4/ref11_rate4.txt @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ + small and easy to use , June 22, 2008 + ByJian Liu (Nashville, TN USA) - See all my reviews +Pros: small enough for one hand, good picture quality especially for the indoors if you choose the indoor mode, big LCD display give me better idea whether to save or delete a picture. Cons: you need to wait for longer time than you expect between two shots for a canon product. However, you can choose the triple shots in one time. diff --git a/SINAI-SA-corpus/4/ref1200_rate4.txt b/SINAI-SA-corpus/4/ref1200_rate4.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..10bb2d534d3426de9b52b2e9bc42d0b598f38b99 --- /dev/null +++ b/SINAI-SA-corpus/4/ref1200_rate4.txt @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ + A great little camera, February 17, 2008 + ByC. Moss (Georgia) - See all my reviews +I bought this as a last minute gift for my 18 year old niece. She loves it. She loves the color, the matching accessories, and most of all she loves the pictures that she's been sharing. I like my DSLR, but for a point and shoot, this one is pretty good. diff --git a/SINAI-SA-corpus/4/ref120_rate4.txt b/SINAI-SA-corpus/4/ref120_rate4.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..118f3a9cf3555f4e23b9f4d924c65c626a835720 --- /dev/null +++ b/SINAI-SA-corpus/4/ref120_rate4.txt @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ + Probably can't be beat in this price range!, December 21, 2008 + ByK. Pidgeon "musicguru" (New Jersey) - See all my reviews +I was looking to buy a less expensive, last year's model point and shoot, because our last camera took a beating, was dropped and died. Got more than I expected with this camera. Very nice features, good pictures. One feature that I love - When you turn the camera to get a tall shot, the camera knows and formats and saves the picture as a "portrait" photo as opposed to "landscape". Very cool. diff --git a/SINAI-SA-corpus/4/ref1213_rate4.txt b/SINAI-SA-corpus/4/ref1213_rate4.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..f08e69f8ded4c3d0cb7be111e482e74afe0084da --- /dev/null +++ b/SINAI-SA-corpus/4/ref1213_rate4.txt @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ + Kodak EasyShare V1003, Pink Rose, March 23, 2008 + ByI. Poss "springtime49" (Wyo Cnty, NY USA) - See all my reviews +I like this camera. I don't like that it takes a couple seconds to auto focus though. It is a 10mp, I would have thought it would be quicker than it is. It's small enough to carry in my purse, which I like. I like the video clips I can take as well. diff --git a/SINAI-SA-corpus/4/ref1214_rate4.txt b/SINAI-SA-corpus/4/ref1214_rate4.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..ff220b33431749f7aacbf46b52bb9892ae9b8f54 --- /dev/null +++ b/SINAI-SA-corpus/4/ref1214_rate4.txt @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ + Sweet!, March 20, 2008 + ByNoms Services Ltd "Noms" - See all my reviews +I think this is one of the best Kodak has ever produced. It is stylish and sleek. It looks more like a cell phone than a camera and thats the attraction. It includes the AC charger unlike the 12MP I just bought which u have to charge with your Pc or laptop if u dont buy the AC charger saperately. It doesn't really blur like the 12MP too. The 12MP is just better only by the shutter speed. I would recommend this better than the 12MP diff --git a/SINAI-SA-corpus/4/ref1216_rate4.txt b/SINAI-SA-corpus/4/ref1216_rate4.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..6e1a41698960c3d4b29e73a17448844e7533b14a --- /dev/null +++ b/SINAI-SA-corpus/4/ref1216_rate4.txt @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ + Kodak V1003, March 10, 2008 + Bycrushergk "Crushergk" (Troy, MI USA) - See all my reviews +Kodak EasyShare V1003 10MP Digital Camera with 3x Optical Zoom (Midnight Black) Have found this camera very easy to work with - would recommend diff --git a/SINAI-SA-corpus/4/ref1218_rate4.txt b/SINAI-SA-corpus/4/ref1218_rate4.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..c3cf5251ee0c4c1eaa296a48e1c4605922a8b695 --- /dev/null +++ b/SINAI-SA-corpus/4/ref1218_rate4.txt @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ + I like my camera, February 25, 2008 + ByC. Malone "song bird" (USA) - See all my reviews +The camera is great, and the pictures turn out awesome! I have gotten so many compliments on the physical appearance of it. The only thing I am not so fond of the camera about it when i press the shutter button, it focuses itself and then flashes. So, for me it is too much of a delay when taking the picture. Other than that I love the camara and the quality of my pics. diff --git a/SINAI-SA-corpus/4/ref1220_rate4.txt b/SINAI-SA-corpus/4/ref1220_rate4.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..e25a0ea2325a6aa1136c0efc397fe8d343f25419 --- /dev/null +++ b/SINAI-SA-corpus/4/ref1220_rate4.txt @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ + kodak easyshare v1003 review, January 23, 2008 + ByT. Eiler (shelbyville kentucky) - See all my reviews +This is a good camera for the price. Very easy to use, and takes great pictures. The menu is easy to navigate, and always a plus, its rechargable. diff --git a/SINAI-SA-corpus/4/ref1221_rate4.txt b/SINAI-SA-corpus/4/ref1221_rate4.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..598b7307735e3a1e120e1d4cb774829df741b38b --- /dev/null +++ b/SINAI-SA-corpus/4/ref1221_rate4.txt @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ + 1st Easy Share, January 17, 2008 + ByEthel R. Swan "Ethel Swan" (USA, Kentucky) - See all my reviews +This is my 1st Easy Share and I love it. I've had so much fun with it. I keep it in my purse at all times, just in case. I've not used to video jet but will soon I'm sure. diff --git a/SINAI-SA-corpus/4/ref1222_rate4.txt b/SINAI-SA-corpus/4/ref1222_rate4.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..58131dd47d8eb549e0b30064adbec97a37ba0b23 --- /dev/null +++ b/SINAI-SA-corpus/4/ref1222_rate4.txt @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ + Great Camera, January 17, 2008 + A Kid's Review +I got this camera for Christmas, and I love it. It takes really amazing photos, and has great features, like PerfectTouch technology. I just wish you could put a frame on the pictures, like some other cameras do. But besides that, I only have good things to say about the Kodak V1003 Digital Camera. diff --git a/SINAI-SA-corpus/4/ref1227_rate4.txt b/SINAI-SA-corpus/4/ref1227_rate4.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..ea5ac8c335037563a88ec7b4a70e5da4614e9824 --- /dev/null +++ b/SINAI-SA-corpus/4/ref1227_rate4.txt @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ + Great Value, July 25, 2007 + ByMelissa (Arkansas) - See all my reviews +This is the third Kodak EasyShare Camera I've owned. They've all been loyal and true. It's fairly durable and easy to use, however it has more options and features than earlier models and it a little more advanced. Takes wonderful portraits and good stills as well. diff --git a/SINAI-SA-corpus/4/ref1229_rate4.txt b/SINAI-SA-corpus/4/ref1229_rate4.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..f9a77f0cc9b717375f9177319c9caf54356219aa --- /dev/null +++ b/SINAI-SA-corpus/4/ref1229_rate4.txt @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ + Nice Little Camera, February 27, 2008 + ByBruce Tracy (CA) - See all my reviews +This is a nice little compact camera. The picture quality has been very good, but I wish it had a view finder. It is sometimes hard to compose pictures using the screen alone. diff --git a/SINAI-SA-corpus/4/ref1230_rate4.txt b/SINAI-SA-corpus/4/ref1230_rate4.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..a364d6e2939fa7ad497e4675d2652a6f814eeeab --- /dev/null +++ b/SINAI-SA-corpus/4/ref1230_rate4.txt @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ + great for electronic uneducated people, December 16, 2008 + ByV. Blankley (northeast, maryland) - See all my reviews +i bought this camera for a birthday gift for my mother who is computer and electronic elliterate, she figured it out with no problems and it is a great little camera. diff --git a/SINAI-SA-corpus/4/ref1232_rate4.txt b/SINAI-SA-corpus/4/ref1232_rate4.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..96dc084528a62a0baf51d6948f20fa996a1f7cee --- /dev/null +++ b/SINAI-SA-corpus/4/ref1232_rate4.txt @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ + pros and cons, December 2, 2008 + ByHoward Jefferson - See all my reviews + Yes, It's 10MP, very clear. But, I also experienced the problem of some buzz with the button. And, it seems that I need to learn to deal with the weak light. diff --git a/SINAI-SA-corpus/4/ref1238_rate4.txt b/SINAI-SA-corpus/4/ref1238_rate4.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..13365aeaac9d798398d09ce212b0201ac2189139 --- /dev/null +++ b/SINAI-SA-corpus/4/ref1238_rate4.txt @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ + Kodak Easy Share 10 Pixel Digital Camera, August 31, 2008 + ByMary C. Albanese - See all my reviews +This camera was delivered as promised. It is my second as I dropped the otherone with the lens open and I am trying to get it repaired. I use it so often I ordered another one. The price is right for the item and I use it often. The photos are very clear and it is an easy to use camera. I love it. It is a bit larger than some digitals but not a problem for me.Kodak EasyShare V1003 10MP Digital Camera with 3x Optical Zoom (Slate Gray) diff --git a/SINAI-SA-corpus/4/ref1242_rate4.txt b/SINAI-SA-corpus/4/ref1242_rate4.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..ec369d694ff7e279a1a9749392b6869f240cae87 --- /dev/null +++ b/SINAI-SA-corpus/4/ref1242_rate4.txt @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ + Picky, picky, picky, July 23, 2008 + ByKnowledgeable User - See all my reviews +Don't believe all the "expert" reviews that give this camera low marks. These clowns are looking for the perfect camera that does not exist. This camera takes great pictures, is easy to use, has loads of features, is small and compact, and is backed by Kodak. That's good enough for 99% of us. diff --git a/SINAI-SA-corpus/4/ref1250_rate4.txt b/SINAI-SA-corpus/4/ref1250_rate4.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..388c20d67c7d5577dab115b48d26af2080408501 --- /dev/null +++ b/SINAI-SA-corpus/4/ref1250_rate4.txt @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ + A little homely looking, but a great camera!, May 30, 2008 + ByRebecca A. Karam "digiGal" (Detroit, MI) - See all my reviews +I just ordered this camera, and so far its perfect for me. I'm not an avid photographer, I just wanted a cheaper, decent camera that was small enough to keep in my purse. I really like how it comes with a recharable battery instead of needing double A's all the time like cameras I've owned in the past. To me, the look of the camera is a little goofy and unfortunately, the booklet it came with is not helpful at all, but other than that, its great! diff --git a/SINAI-SA-corpus/4/ref1255_rate4.txt b/SINAI-SA-corpus/4/ref1255_rate4.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..6a59568ded5df790dca27a304eb5cd524ba469a8 --- /dev/null +++ b/SINAI-SA-corpus/4/ref1255_rate4.txt @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ + Not that bad!!!, May 8, 2008 + ByLeo12 - See all my reviews +Too many bad comments about this product. I have to be fair. The quality of the pictures can be as good as that of my Canon SD630 (the auto-focus function is even smarter because it knows where to focus), and much better than my older Sony Cybershot DSC-T5. It also amazes me with the very smart panorama function, allowing me to take 3 different pictures then merge them together to make a wide panorama. That said, it can be the slowest camera I ever had in terms of operation. However, I don't mind that because I don't use it for taking pictures of children. For my personal need, I would give it 4 stars. diff --git a/SINAI-SA-corpus/4/ref1257_rate4.txt b/SINAI-SA-corpus/4/ref1257_rate4.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..1e2062e7cd61cc5dfacedc178dc7f14d816091e5 --- /dev/null +++ b/SINAI-SA-corpus/4/ref1257_rate4.txt @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ + Kodak Digital Approved!!!, April 24, 2008 + ByJohn Tavcar "Peter Pan Syndrome" (Phoenix, AZ) - See all my reviews +I think it's a great camera especially for the price! It has a lot of features and I'm technologically challenged so it's taking me a while to figure out all it all it has to offer but I would definitely recommend it to family and friends!!! diff --git a/SINAI-SA-corpus/4/ref1258_rate4.txt b/SINAI-SA-corpus/4/ref1258_rate4.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..406ca58fa80cc2d61d10ce047e48ac94e80091f8 --- /dev/null +++ b/SINAI-SA-corpus/4/ref1258_rate4.txt @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ + V1003 Results, April 13, 2008 + ByRAM "RAM" (CA) - See all my reviews +Pictures of wildflowers, both distance and close-ups were found to be quite comparable to those taken with my 10x optical Kodak camera. A "stitched" photo of the USS Ronald Reagan came out well. My only objection to the camera's features it that it doesn't have a viewfinder (very useful when in full sunlight and the screen is hard to see). diff --git a/SINAI-SA-corpus/4/ref125_rate4.txt b/SINAI-SA-corpus/4/ref125_rate4.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..bd686560c2a3ba1191a7036f1d8f16018ceb4e55 --- /dev/null +++ b/SINAI-SA-corpus/4/ref125_rate4.txt @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ + Great Camera, December 20, 2008 + ByJHG (Pittsburgh, PA USA) - See all my reviews +It is everything that I can ask of this type of camera. It is easy to use, produces great photos, and is a bargain. I especially like the fact that it has a viewfinder, which is rare these days. It really helps on bright days. The instruction manual is excellent. diff --git a/SINAI-SA-corpus/4/ref1262_rate4.txt b/SINAI-SA-corpus/4/ref1262_rate4.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..6738003921845cf66d12fd272bf8a8f35dccc9b2 --- /dev/null +++ b/SINAI-SA-corpus/4/ref1262_rate4.txt @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ + Rochester, NY still putting out the goods., April 6, 2008 + ByDavid A. Rivera "DND" (Columbus, OH) - See all my reviews +I dont care what anyone says, kodak cameras have THE best color than any other brand and this camera proves it. The pictures are very detailed, even though it only has a 3x zoom, the image can be further zoomed upon on photoshop and still is clear. 2 things I dont like about it is the zoom sound when video recording and how the buttons are spread out, but over all a good camera. Finicky people need to get a grip. diff --git a/SINAI-SA-corpus/4/ref126_rate4.txt b/SINAI-SA-corpus/4/ref126_rate4.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..965aa7a558aa43674bb4afa0719c23ccbc39aa07 --- /dev/null +++ b/SINAI-SA-corpus/4/ref126_rate4.txt @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ + Excellent outdoor camera, December 19, 2008 + ByArchman (Lincoln, CA USA) - See all my reviews +Purchased the camera to take pictures on our Hawaii cruise. The following reflects our requirements: 1. Small and portable with good grip (not too skinny) 2. Good zoom (3x or higher) 3. LCD and viewfinder 4. AA batteries 5. Inexpensive 6. Image stabilization 7. Good reviews from amazon After considering other point and shoot cameras, my wife and I settled for the 590IS. It met all of our requirements and the pictures came out amazing. Almost all of the outside pictures had exceptional details. It made cropping and reducing picture size for sending out to friends and families very easy. One buddy (photographer) noted how well the Cannon took pictures inside the house....not too noisy (within 5 feet, further and you will need an external flash which is expensive). Another photographer buddy actually recommended this camera independently of my research. We are glad that we received this camera prior to the trip. We are truly delightful with the results. One note for those taking a lot of inside pictures. You will need an external flash unit (High-Power Flash HF-DC1 - about $100) to get good pictures beyond 5-7 feet. I will start trying the manual controls for some creative picture taking. diff --git a/SINAI-SA-corpus/4/ref1271_rate4.txt b/SINAI-SA-corpus/4/ref1271_rate4.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..f0e9983935e5c776dff543c3225b331de53520af --- /dev/null +++ b/SINAI-SA-corpus/4/ref1271_rate4.txt @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ + Nice, January 19, 2008 + ByDena (Twin cities, Minnesota) - See all my reviews +This is a nice fairly simple camara. I bought it for my sister for christmas. I liked it because of the color, size and features. Thought it was a good price for the features. diff --git a/SINAI-SA-corpus/4/ref1272_rate4.txt b/SINAI-SA-corpus/4/ref1272_rate4.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..c5eb07d7cf5b402a00795568ab8de88b35c2c3b4 --- /dev/null +++ b/SINAI-SA-corpus/4/ref1272_rate4.txt @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ + Kokak Easy Share, December 28, 2007 + ByDiane K. King (Cushing, Texas) - See all my reviews +My daughter purchased it. It doesn't seem as clear as my 8-pixel for some reason, and it is a 10-pixel, most noticeable inside. Not sure what the problem is. Arrived quickly and seemed to be fine at first. diff --git a/SINAI-SA-corpus/4/ref1274_rate4.txt b/SINAI-SA-corpus/4/ref1274_rate4.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..52ddaf142ae7f7db15ffcd6e3ae680374f0a7259 --- /dev/null +++ b/SINAI-SA-corpus/4/ref1274_rate4.txt @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ + Camera, September 22, 2007 + ByLawrence R. Morris "Big Mo" (Bagram, Afghanistan) - See all my reviews +It was a great purchase. For the money I think it's the best value available. I have always been pleased with Kodak products and this camera is no different. diff --git a/SINAI-SA-corpus/4/ref1280_rate4.txt b/SINAI-SA-corpus/4/ref1280_rate4.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..0af701cb409b8bcec7efd2dc8a97f623d0e6f2ae --- /dev/null +++ b/SINAI-SA-corpus/4/ref1280_rate4.txt @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ + It`s a great camera., February 13, 2008 + ByMike - See all my reviews +I so happy with my new camera because it`s more smaller than other cameras and it has excellente focus. diff --git a/SINAI-SA-corpus/4/ref1281_rate4.txt b/SINAI-SA-corpus/4/ref1281_rate4.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..4377cdd27652f07a9a73a8605b6d06762ecd62d5 --- /dev/null +++ b/SINAI-SA-corpus/4/ref1281_rate4.txt @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ + Fun product, February 10, 2008 + ByJ. Lash (Missouri, USA) - See all my reviews +I have not used this camera much yet, but it's very easy to use and transfer pictures. Lots of great features! I'm not a girly girl, but I love the pink - very cute!! diff --git a/SINAI-SA-corpus/4/ref1282_rate4.txt b/SINAI-SA-corpus/4/ref1282_rate4.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..a6425faf88dab88a97186ee344596f51a9f27232 --- /dev/null +++ b/SINAI-SA-corpus/4/ref1282_rate4.txt @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ + A decent camera for the money, but I expected better, February 8, 2008 + ByJ. Vickers "jillcreations" (Holyoke, MA) - See all my reviews +The camera is ok, but the pictures tend to be on the dark side. I can not get the camera to connect to my pc. I got to work twice but now it will not at all, maybe it is just a bad USB cable. diff --git a/SINAI-SA-corpus/4/ref1283_rate4.txt b/SINAI-SA-corpus/4/ref1283_rate4.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..cea37853433fce3e4503d97ef78a10e40c3416a5 --- /dev/null +++ b/SINAI-SA-corpus/4/ref1283_rate4.txt @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ + good, December 27, 2007 + ByErika Olvera (dallas tx) - See all my reviews +transaction was easy and smooth, delivered by expected time, product was in good condition.. good price.. shopped other stores/sites.. amazon was the cheapest diff --git a/SINAI-SA-corpus/4/ref128_rate4.txt b/SINAI-SA-corpus/4/ref128_rate4.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..de2b0599acce4815e71d63af7cf5f07830b937d8 --- /dev/null +++ b/SINAI-SA-corpus/4/ref128_rate4.txt @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ + Good buy for the price, but there are better cameras out there, December 17, 2008 + ByK. Andrews - See all my reviews +I've owned four 7MP+ cameras, and this one comes in last for picture quality. Considering this was half of the price of any of the others, I'm not complaining too much. My primary reason for purchasing this inexpensive camera is so that my husband and daughter will stop borrowing mine, and that mission has now been accomplished. What I have found with this camera is that when using the preset modes, every picture I've taken has come out darker than expected. I've had to go in and adjust the brightness more than with any other camera I've ever owned. I tend to do heavy photo editing, so that was not a big deal for me considering I normally crop, adjust tones and saturation, add text, add frames, and often convert to black and white or sepia. I have not experimented yet with manual modes, and probably won't due to the fact that my husband and daughter will be the primary users. This camera comes with no internal memory at all, which I found to be a downside. A 32 MB SD card was included which holds a couple dozen photos, so you'll want to order a higher capacity one with this camera. I bought the Transcend 4 GB SDHC SD Class 6 Flash Memory Card TS4GSDHC6E [Amazon Frustration-Free Packaging] and it can hold over 1000 photos taken at full resolution. The battery life is excellent on this camera. I've already taken 150+ photos with the children and the batteries have not yet run out. What most impresses me with this camera is one of the few point and shoot digital cameras that can accept a wide angle or telephoto lens. I plan to order the wide angle lens and put it into my daughters stocking. (Just search Amazon for a590is lens and several options will show up.) diff --git a/SINAI-SA-corpus/4/ref1293_rate4.txt b/SINAI-SA-corpus/4/ref1293_rate4.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..6da02747baaa77846dbf6b3bc76c451945ea2c33 --- /dev/null +++ b/SINAI-SA-corpus/4/ref1293_rate4.txt @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ + Lovely replacement camera, November 25, 2005 + BySyouki - See all my reviews +I bought this camera to replace my Kodak DX4330 that was stolen earlier this year. I love how easy this camera is to use and the quality as well as zoom. The outside colors are wonderful. My only problem with the camera is the quality of the inside colors. I've tried various settings and they continue to come out rather a little dark unlike my 4330. I still love this camera though and wouldn't change it for any other camera. Thank you Kodak for another lovely camera. The 10x zoom is one of the things that got me to purchase this. And I agree that I'd like to be able to zoom while filming, but the first time I used the video feature was at a United Way truck pull infront of my place of employment as I had to film and take photos. I was amazed at how well the video turned out. diff --git a/SINAI-SA-corpus/4/ref1299_rate4.txt b/SINAI-SA-corpus/4/ref1299_rate4.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..20e8cf493b91820bd4f88cba287b0284c7185692 --- /dev/null +++ b/SINAI-SA-corpus/4/ref1299_rate4.txt @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ + Happy with camera, July 29, 2006 + ByMom of three in New Lenox (Illinois) - See all my reviews +I purchased this camera and was going to return it because of it's size (actually purchased a smaller camera with a larger LCD and returned it for lack of zoom and the gadgets). I love the zoom and the LCD is clear. My one disappointment is that the optical viewfinder is not very clear at all - gives a distorted view as someone else mentioned. I'm still on the original battery pack it came with after about 150 pictures. The software is very easy to use. I am a beginner with a digital and really enjoyed using all the different modes during a family trip to Disney. I printed pictures by downloading them to my computer and uploading them to a local drug store. I really obsessed over the purchase of this camera and after using it on our trip, I am very happy with my purchase. The camera is great for beginners, easy to use. great color, etc. The 4 stars is for the optical viewfinder. diff --git a/SINAI-SA-corpus/4/ref1301_rate4.txt b/SINAI-SA-corpus/4/ref1301_rate4.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..d62c47cff0af189d71b053a3e6586b21ae8044b3 --- /dev/null +++ b/SINAI-SA-corpus/4/ref1301_rate4.txt @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ + No AC Adapter, January 25, 2006 + Byboguman (Lebanon, PA United States) - See all my reviews +The camera works fine, but now we have to shell out more $$$ for the AC adaptor/charger. The review says it's included. It's not! diff --git a/SINAI-SA-corpus/4/ref1306_rate4.txt b/SINAI-SA-corpus/4/ref1306_rate4.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..c43246ff5c7a59458a0009b4e02131ee1d6fb74b --- /dev/null +++ b/SINAI-SA-corpus/4/ref1306_rate4.txt @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ + good camera, lots of features, March 28, 2007 + ByWalleeCee (Portland, OR USA) - See all my reviews +This is a pretty good camera, loaded with lots of features. The pros include the 10x optical zoom, use of SD card, and battery consumption. Also, with this camera you have the ability to buy add-ons such as zoom lenses and such - makes it nice for those that are just past beginner experience. There are a couple of cons that I've found, the most important being the picture quality. Although it does have the capability to take great photos, you have to make sure and wait several seconds between shots to ensure that they'll come out looking great (in my opinion, anyway). The size is okay, although it is kinda bulky for being so small. I prefer something that size to also be slim - it's not so easy to carry around because of this. Overall, this camera is very easy to use. diff --git a/SINAI-SA-corpus/4/ref1339_rate4.txt b/SINAI-SA-corpus/4/ref1339_rate4.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..99c2591babd5c908fdabab653efc990baa7f2776 --- /dev/null +++ b/SINAI-SA-corpus/4/ref1339_rate4.txt @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ + xxxx, July 19, 2005 + ByJoseph R. Soucy (Abilene Tx. USA) - See all my reviews +Haven't used the camera enough to form an opinion. Having one small problem,,,, every time I turn on the camera, the flash pops up. Wrote to Kodak and they suggested that I send it in for repair. I didn't think it was that big a deal, so will hold off for now. I've got plenty of warrenty time left to deal with it if that becomes necessary. diff --git a/SINAI-SA-corpus/4/ref1357_rate4.txt b/SINAI-SA-corpus/4/ref1357_rate4.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..f3d3a36a3c7109132b40e27597caccaeea552637 --- /dev/null +++ b/SINAI-SA-corpus/4/ref1357_rate4.txt @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ + Kodak Z740, February 24, 2006 + ByD. Watkins (Franklinville, New York United States) - See all my reviews +This is a fine camera and worth the price. It's easy to use and provides very good quality prints. diff --git a/SINAI-SA-corpus/4/ref1358_rate4.txt b/SINAI-SA-corpus/4/ref1358_rate4.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..43f24fb8f9d571b58011c475d9b6163afdcfe2fb --- /dev/null +++ b/SINAI-SA-corpus/4/ref1358_rate4.txt @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ + great camera, August 31, 2005 + Bydenise (ct) - See all my reviews +I love this camera. I'm very happy with this product and highly recommend it for others. As with most digitals the camera's only downfall is the delay. diff --git a/SINAI-SA-corpus/4/ref1360_rate4.txt b/SINAI-SA-corpus/4/ref1360_rate4.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..01abd8b6973572aa630c888d7901ac42a27248db --- /dev/null +++ b/SINAI-SA-corpus/4/ref1360_rate4.txt @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ + great digital camera with a few flaws, September 26, 2005 + ByScott L. Young (Sudbury, MA USA) - See all my reviews +My first foray into the digital camera world was also with a Kodak brand. I loved that camera, until I loaned it out and it came back ruined. The model was unfortunately discontinued, so I scouted all brands, but ended up back with Kodak and this particular model. Selling points - (1) the price for a 5MP was very competitive; (2) the 10x zoom is amazing; (3) it comes with a great variety of photo-enablers which are very helpful to the point (4) if the 10x capability isn't enough for you addtional lenses can be added. Drawbacks - (1) the size, I thought that it was smaller than it is, but with the 10x lens apparatus, it gets bulky; (2) a bit big and an awkward shape for storing in a backpack for quick access; (3) the lens cover is a drag, it doesn't stay on! - a better design would be one of those automatic lens close-ups. But, nonetheless, this is a fine camera for people who want an excellent value, many features and top quality pictures. diff --git a/SINAI-SA-corpus/4/ref1362_rate4.txt b/SINAI-SA-corpus/4/ref1362_rate4.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..ef36728aacaa6856d648d7f53390fa66c86b7141 --- /dev/null +++ b/SINAI-SA-corpus/4/ref1362_rate4.txt @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ + Excellent camera for the price, August 4, 2005 + ByW. Foust (Altoona, PA USA) - See all my reviews +If you're an amateur or professional photographer, this camera is for you. It has point and shoot with auto mode, adjustable white balance, ISO, and lots of scene modes. It has 10x zoom to get up close and personal, with 5x more digital zoom (though it's not recommended you use digital zoom much as it pixellates your image). PROS: - 10x zoom - Fast shooting - Lots of scene modes CONS: - Flash pops up every time you turn it on - Viewfinder is electronic diff --git a/SINAI-SA-corpus/4/ref1365_rate4.txt b/SINAI-SA-corpus/4/ref1365_rate4.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..4bd643e29002c461289229480915ee9337f27c11 --- /dev/null +++ b/SINAI-SA-corpus/4/ref1365_rate4.txt @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ + GREAT FOR BEGINNERS, March 13, 2006 + ByKelly (Houston, TX) - See all my reviews +This was my first digital camera and I love it. After years of having a film SLR I was skeptical about moving up to a digital. I was afraid that the pictures just wouldn't compare. The digital SLRs are just so expensive and I wasn't sure how I would do with digital. I wanted something with the ease of point and shoot but with option to go at least semi-manual. This camera is perfect. The price can't be beat. I have taken some absolutely beautiful photos and the quality is exceptional. The 5 MP is just fine and handles an 8x10 with ease and even has the ability to be blown up larger than that w/o losing picture quality. The sport setting is awesome as long as you get focused at the correct distance before the action starts. The battery that came with the camera has lasted so much longer than I expected it to. I have had the camera for over a month and shot hundreds of pics without the battery going dead yet. Overall, it is has been a great camera to start out with. I will move up to a DSLR one of these days but for now I couldn't be happier with my Z740. diff --git a/SINAI-SA-corpus/4/ref1372_rate4.txt b/SINAI-SA-corpus/4/ref1372_rate4.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..bd4fa752dacdef0512336b6fb13203d0adbabff2 --- /dev/null +++ b/SINAI-SA-corpus/4/ref1372_rate4.txt @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ + wonderful camera, July 7, 2005 + ByTasha M. Larson "usmc wife" (Yuma, Arizona) - See all my reviews +I decided on this camera after receiving photos from a friend that had a Kodak. The images were amazingly sharp and the prints I made looked professional. I hate reading owners manuals, but this camera is extremely user friendly. My one complaint is that the batteries that come with the camera are not rechargable. The camera is a little bulky (less than the previous model), but I bought it for the quality of photos, not to fit into my back pocket. It is very easy to download the photos to my computer using the USB port, however I have a little trouble transferring them to the other photo program I prefer to use, but this is most likely my fault due to lack of knowledge of the programs. If you are looking for a camera to preserve memories, I highly recommend the Z740. diff --git a/SINAI-SA-corpus/4/ref1375_rate4.txt b/SINAI-SA-corpus/4/ref1375_rate4.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..f9953eae25306314611b9f05c33e6177b8669f6f --- /dev/null +++ b/SINAI-SA-corpus/4/ref1375_rate4.txt @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ + Great pictures, Easy to use!, February 2, 2006 + ByGeenie Beenie "Gina" (Bend, OR USA) - See all my reviews +I just got this Kodak Z740 5MP camera for Christmas after reading the reviews on Amazon.com and am very impressed. The picture quality is crisp and clear. I had a Cannon and while it took nice quality pictures, it was so difficult to interpret the various menus. Kodak has done a wonderful job of laying out the menu in such a simple way. It is easy to use and you dont have to wait 5 seconds for the picture to snap either. I highly recommend this camera. The only negative point I have to make is that the lens cover comes off too easily, so make sure you get a good camera case to protect the lens cover from being bumped. diff --git a/SINAI-SA-corpus/4/ref1379_rate4.txt b/SINAI-SA-corpus/4/ref1379_rate4.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..75f0b70e4e934634232a4183a8b5b37f97b5b56c --- /dev/null +++ b/SINAI-SA-corpus/4/ref1379_rate4.txt @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ + unbeatable for the money, August 13, 2005 + Byno expert "poolman" (strongsville,oh) - See all my reviews +i am by no means an expert but this camera continues to impress me. easy to use, not too big or too small and the prints from the printer dock have wonderful color and clarity. using the digital zoom can take some getting used to only because it is hard to hold the camera still enough without the use of a tripod to get a clear pic. i would highly recommend this camera to anyone who is looking for a digital camera with top end performance with mid range price, printer dock is well worth the money. more than enough features to keep you busy for a long time. i love it! i cannot believe i lived so long without it. diff --git a/SINAI-SA-corpus/4/ref1382_rate4.txt b/SINAI-SA-corpus/4/ref1382_rate4.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..07f3e87c1afc7b6de53b785d750ea8cc362236a5 --- /dev/null +++ b/SINAI-SA-corpus/4/ref1382_rate4.txt @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ + Awesome Camera BUT DOES ANYONE..., July 20, 2005 + ByGina Jozaitis (Chicago, IL) - See all my reviews +I just used a friend's Z740 and the first thing i noticed is the LCD screen. Unlike any other digital camera I've looked at, this one looked like I was watching a fuzzy TV channel. It has a lot of noise and movement, not clear at all. When looking through the viewfinder, same thing... lights up and fuzzy noise moving around. I thought it was a defect and called Kodak. After lots of time on hold, the man reported to me that this is normal on the Z740 and that it's their only camera that does this. He said it's to compensate for low lighting. It's very annoying to me to see such a blurry preview. [...] The pictures turned out great, but it was difficult to tell if they were in focus before I took them because of all the noise on the LCD screen. i felt like i was using a videocamera. [...] Thanks! diff --git a/SINAI-SA-corpus/4/ref1388_rate4.txt b/SINAI-SA-corpus/4/ref1388_rate4.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..27e2aa425f346bb0e668c865b892ec15ab35729d --- /dev/null +++ b/SINAI-SA-corpus/4/ref1388_rate4.txt @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ + No USB cord!, March 16, 2005 + ByCrazy Scientist (Washington, DC) - See all my reviews +This is an amazing camera, which really takes great photos. The 10X optical zoom is excellent. The quality of the prints are great too. However, be aware that when ordered with the printer docking station, a USB cord to connect your camera directly to your computer is NOT included. Kodak includes a USB cord to connect the printer to the computer, but who wants to carry the printer everywhere. I called Kodak and apparently they want to charge $14.95 for the cord. diff --git a/SINAI-SA-corpus/4/ref138_rate4.txt b/SINAI-SA-corpus/4/ref138_rate4.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..ed0503f69cff861c54df90f5dfc3a71771e7ef94 --- /dev/null +++ b/SINAI-SA-corpus/4/ref138_rate4.txt @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ + Great camera, November 21, 2008 + ByMom Of Two (NH) - See all my reviews +I first purchased a blue Kodak EasyShare M863 8.2MP Digital Camera with 3x Optical Zoom (Red) and hated it. The pics taken outside were horrible. I returned it and bought this. It takes nice pics, both inside and out. Easy to use. Battery life has been fine as well. The only problem I found so far has been that the automatic setting does not take decent pics of children who are active. So, I have to put it on the children setting. Which is not a big deal to me. If you are looking to keep it on one setting all the time and not worry about it, then I suggest looking for another make/model. diff --git a/SINAI-SA-corpus/4/ref1390_rate4.txt b/SINAI-SA-corpus/4/ref1390_rate4.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..a505d5f9a0083b193465dfc3597572e95ac67c2e --- /dev/null +++ b/SINAI-SA-corpus/4/ref1390_rate4.txt @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ + High-end features, good price...and a couple flaws, February 27, 2006 + ByChristopher Hansen "SFGOAKRFAN" (Sacramento, CA USA) - See all my reviews +The Kodak Z740 was my first digital camera. I had experience using a Nikon SLR and various different Olympus, Canon, and Kodak models. I was looking for something with a good zoom, because I hate not being able to get a picture I want when I am too far away. This was the cheapest of the 10X+ optical zoom cameras that I found so I thought I would take look at it. Pros: 1. 10X zoom 2. a lot of shooting modes (4 main types, 12or so more in the SCN function and also manual PASM) 3. Kodak color 4. easy to use format 5. comfortable feel 6. good size screen (not great but very adequate) 7. PRICE! Cons: 1. Lens Cap (it has two big buttons which make it easy to remove but also is easily knocked off with the slightest pressure on even one button. 2. EVF is a bit grainy 3. Burst mode is a bit slow and you tend to shoot blind (CNET review) but not a huge issue unless the object you are using the burst mode for is moving at a rapid pace and in an unpredicatable direction. Will be interesting to see if the slowness improves when I recieve my high performance SD card. 4. Perhaps the biggest flaw is the lack of image stabilization. The Higher end cameras in the same category to the Z740 all have it. If you ever try to shoot a moving target at 10X Zoom it could be very difficult. This feature is what makes this camera 4 instead of 5 stars. Unfortunately if you want image stabilization it will most likely cost you $100 more for a camera with it and all the features this camera has. diff --git a/SINAI-SA-corpus/4/ref1391_rate4.txt b/SINAI-SA-corpus/4/ref1391_rate4.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..53250067e8bc23a9ea4ca71b9d49e86b84e603a8 --- /dev/null +++ b/SINAI-SA-corpus/4/ref1391_rate4.txt @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ + Great camera for a good price, January 21, 2006 + Byrmthunder "rmthunder" (Nearcincinnati, Ohio) - See all my reviews +Pros: The zoom on this camera is really nice, digital zoom is better than I expected, many manual options, small file size, good battery life, good color, good quality movies, 2 AA batteries. I have used it for 2 months with no major problems. Minor Cons: Lens cap comes off easily, Too much redeye indoors. Flash is back far on the camera, which can cause the light to be blocked on close up macro shots, No image stabilizer. diff --git a/SINAI-SA-corpus/4/ref1392_rate4.txt b/SINAI-SA-corpus/4/ref1392_rate4.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..4b513b38b4871edc5e1447dfe2fbad39e002a77d --- /dev/null +++ b/SINAI-SA-corpus/4/ref1392_rate4.txt @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ + For the price..., July 13, 2006 + ByCurtis Smith "hobbyist" (Casper, Wy. USA) - See all my reviews +This is only really the second digital camera that I have had much experience with, and so far it has been the best. It has always been a personal dream of mine to own a "real" camera that I could carry everywhere with me and shoot great pics at a moments notice, and so far this camera fits the bill perfectly. It has been over a week now that I have owned it and in that time I have taken well over 300 pictures, and in the process driven my wife nuts. The only complaints that I could offer up for this camera are that it will burn through a set of batteries fairly quick and when using it for a night shot unless it is stabilized pretty well ( with tripod ) the shots may come out a little blurry. Other than that I couldn't ask for anything more in a "first" camera. With the availability of additional lenses and a surprising amount of accessories you still have room to grow with this model. The menus are extremely easy to access and settings as easy to adjust. I purchased the 512MB SD card with mine which should keep you shooting for some time until you have to transfer files. With mine at 5MP quality it will hold approximately 320 pictures, not to mention regular ( quicktime ) video with sound. While it may not keep up with the big money "professional" cameras I think it would be a great deal for any other aspiring "hobbyist" such as myself. Be sure and check out the sample pics for some great user submitted photos including my own entries. For the price this camera will not dissapoint. The only reason I gave it 4 stars instead of 5 is that I personally don't know if there is a 5 star product anywhere, and I will save that 5th star for the day I find it. Thanks diff --git a/SINAI-SA-corpus/4/ref1393_rate4.txt b/SINAI-SA-corpus/4/ref1393_rate4.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..6986c6754f9884ac95a122a351f681488765e6f1 --- /dev/null +++ b/SINAI-SA-corpus/4/ref1393_rate4.txt @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ + Nice price on a pretty decent camera., February 17, 2006 + ByKevan J. Angel (Denver, CO USA) - See all my reviews +As someone who is mainly taking pictures of my family for memories sake, I was looking for a camera with around 5 mega pixels and a zoom lens. The z740 had the features I was looking for, and didn't cost a bundle. So far, I am very satisfied with the quality of pictures that it takes, however THERE ARE DOWNSIDES. First it takes a while to boot up, not forever, but for a guy like me who is used to a quick film camera, it seems like forever. And the power saving feature (which I do believe is mostly a good thing) requires you to restart the camera after a few minutes of not shooting. Then when it's time for a picture.. oops you have to turn it on. This feature can be turned off, but then you waste battery life. Also the write speed seems a bit slow. Overall I think THE PROCESSOR IS A BIT SLUGGISH. Another problem is that the screen is pretty small. You probably wouldn't notice this unless you compare it to it's more expensive counterparts. Finally, the whole Kodak EasyShare thing is really retarded. It does for your camera what AOL does to the internet. That is it limits you to using it's software, it's website etc. If you know how to use a computer, my advice to you is don't install the software! Overall, for a novice photographer who wants to make great prints this is a good buy. diff --git a/SINAI-SA-corpus/4/ref1399_rate4.txt b/SINAI-SA-corpus/4/ref1399_rate4.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..a45a480553099883ac4de459a71a7f72f468e025 --- /dev/null +++ b/SINAI-SA-corpus/4/ref1399_rate4.txt @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ + For those who are having problems with the Video (sound), May 13, 2006 + ByMark Burke "StillHere" (Ohio) - See all my reviews +I've noticed on several sites, that some are reporting that the sound doesn't work when playing the video files and the camera appears to be broken for this reason. Video players such as Microsoft's Media Player may play the video, but it won't play the audio sound unless you have Apple's "Quicktime" loaded on your computer, as Kodak chose to couple their video to the Quicktime format. You can download the watered down version of Quicktime for free from the Web (and it provides an alternative to MS Media Player also.) If you don't like having Quicktime being a memory hog and starting up each time you start your computer, you can set those preferences, and you can keep it from showing up in the systray on the lower right side of your screen by going to the following in Quicktime: Edit/Preferences/Quicktime Preferences/Browser Plugin and then uncheck the QuickTime System Tray box. If I fault Kodak, it would be that this is not well known, this is hardly user friendly and it's caused them to receive a lot of bashing on a number of internet sites until the cause is discovered. Seems like an easily avoidable casualty. Kinda reminds one of the goofy stuff American automobile manufacturers did, like making economy cars and then forcing their owners to fill up with the most expensive high-octane gas, or advertise big vehicles with big motors when record prices were on the way, while the competition continued to pump out record numbers of small, efficient, well engineered cars. The camera itself, takes excellent pictures, especially during well lighted conditions, and the zoom has allowed me to take pictures of deer at distances I wouldn't have thought possible just a few years ago. You can cut the next-shot "wait" time in half if you shut off the picture review on the rear view panel. The "sound" mess with Quicktime, is the only reason I give it 4 stars instead of 5, because other than that "duh," seems to be an excellent camera. diff --git a/SINAI-SA-corpus/4/ref13_rate4.txt b/SINAI-SA-corpus/4/ref13_rate4.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..a1bab5547876c20ea089a3ebfb5a7eb91ed6cb79 --- /dev/null +++ b/SINAI-SA-corpus/4/ref13_rate4.txt @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ + I like it., June 14, 2008 + Byjth747 (WV, USA) - See all my reviews +I bought this camera for a pocket, take it anywhere. It takes great pictures, just the right size for a small camera for my hands. Despite this, i have dropped it twice, once on pavement, once on concrete. To my amazement, it survived unscathed both times. Can't guarantee these results, but I am pleased. Only drawback I see is it is mediocre on battery life. Highly recommended. diff --git a/SINAI-SA-corpus/4/ref1402_rate4.txt b/SINAI-SA-corpus/4/ref1402_rate4.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..0b9d9a43c5fcf254ffea4b98639f90d8ec8b4023 --- /dev/null +++ b/SINAI-SA-corpus/4/ref1402_rate4.txt @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ + A good camera with a few weak points, April 23, 2006 + ByBernie Bernbaum (Tustin, CA USA) - See all my reviews +I have a large (35 mm size) digital camera which my spouse really dislikes because of the weight and size. I happened upon the Kodak Z740 on sale and bought it because of its small size, good optical zoom, and relatively high pixel count. After using it for a few hundred pictures and a few videos, I find it to be a mix of good features and weaknesses. The good points are: 1. The camera takes good pictures, with good color, under a variety of lighting conditions. 2. The auto ISO works well with the flash so that you can get a well lit flash picture indoors even at some distance. This is important because the flash on small cameras is usually not very powerful. 3. The 10X optical zoom was very important to me to be able to reach across a room to get a closeup. 4. With a 1G SD card, you can take over 600 pictures before the card even thinks of filling up. 5. Burst mode works well and it fun to use, especially since the memory card holds so many pictures. 6. The video feature is also a lot of fun and works well, and records sound pretty good. A video does not use up excessive memory. I found that I started using the video more and more. A short (30 to 60 seconds) video is fun to watch and not as tedious as most home videos. 7. It's easy to access the shutter and f-stop controls in program mode. In fact, all of the controls are easy to use, and the menu for setup is easy to understand. 8. The shape of the camera fits the hand well. It's easy to handle and reach all the controls. The weaknesses are: 1. The camera takes too long to start up. If you have the camera turned off and have a picture to take, you'll probably miss the shot. 2. (this is a big problem) The camera shuts down after some time that you can set in the setup, maybe three or five minutes. It doesn't go into sleep mode - it shuts down. What the camera should do is go into sleep mode and wake up when you press the shutter buton half way. To wake the camera back up you have to turn it off and then turn it back on again, guaranteeing that you will miss whateve shot you want to take. The designers were probably trying to save people from themselves by sutting off the camera after some time. Perhaps on a future camera they'll offer an option of "shut off" or "sleep". 3. The camera is slow to focus in lower light conditions. Again, unless you take the focus time into account, you'll miss your shot. Focus time in good light is a bit slow but acceptable. 4. With QuickView on, the camera is slow between shots - you just can't take a few shots in quick succession, except in burst mode. If you turn QuickView off, you get a bit faster cycle time between pictures but it's really nice to see the picture after you take it. One way to solve this problem is to show the QuickView on the LCD screen, and let the eye viewer continue to operate as a viewfinder. 5. Battery life is so-so. The lithium ion batteries are too expensive and with rechargable batteries the time between seeing the "low battery" indicator and the camera not working is much too short. You really need to have a replacement set of batteries in your pocket because the camera will stop working without much warning. The lens cap is junk - throw it away and get a netural density filter if you're worried about damaging the lens. But digital cameras are disposable - this one will be obsolete in a few years so don't worry about damage to the lens. Some people have commented about the lack of image stabilization but I certainly have not missed it. The imager in the camera has good sensitivity and coupled with the auto ISO the camera never seems to shoot at a slow enough sutter speed that you'd need stabilization. Perhaps in very low light conditions, or in special situations with extreme zoom, it'd be of value. There are a few other things I'm not crazy about but they are more in the area of personal preferences so I won't list them here. I don't use the PC software that came with the camera so I can't comment on it (I didn't install it). All-in-all, the camera is not bad, but I'd sure like one that solved some of the problems I listed above. My spouse loves it, primarily because it's smaller and lighter than my digital SLR. diff --git a/SINAI-SA-corpus/4/ref1403_rate4.txt b/SINAI-SA-corpus/4/ref1403_rate4.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..d4108bc401808e6e81a0b6943910824423ba1c07 --- /dev/null +++ b/SINAI-SA-corpus/4/ref1403_rate4.txt @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ + Great value - super product, March 13, 2006 + ByEduardo Del Valle "Pulpo" (Lima, Peru) - See all my reviews +I was looking for MY first Digital camera, were I work we have several brand and models, but this one has most of the features that the more expensive models have. The 10x zoom is awesome! Dream machine. Easy to use programs for the average user and lots of options for the over average one. I do lots of sports and I love the multi frame capabilities of the camera, 2 frames per seccond and can either take the first or the last 4 so you can pick the best one. 0.4 secconds per picture and if you use an additional memory the internal serves as cache so you can keep taking pictures while the camera saves them. Be aware that the flash only works in the first picture under frame mode. I can tell that it has a really fast proccessor unit because when I review a picture and I play with the zoom and the pan it does it really fast. The overall response of the machine is quick. I would love to have the histogram, but not available, if you really need it buy the Z7590, it does have it. diff --git a/SINAI-SA-corpus/4/ref1408_rate4.txt b/SINAI-SA-corpus/4/ref1408_rate4.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..750ce9b112ded3a399fdcc41b7e28a5db285d1d9 --- /dev/null +++ b/SINAI-SA-corpus/4/ref1408_rate4.txt @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ + A couple of little problems, March 6, 2006 + ByJohn Scott "johasco" (Sherman Oaks, CA United States) - See all my reviews +I concur with most of the comments here. I write only to point out a couple of things which differ in the Z740 as compared with the earlier DX6490 model. While some consider it a good feature, it annoys me that the flash opens every time you turn the camera on, since I prefer to shoot with available light whenever possible. Of a bit more concern, if you prefer to use the viewfinder rather than composing pictures with the rear screen, as I do, and if you prefer to use your left eye, as I do, the zoom control is too close to the viewfinder to be easily accessible. You either have take the camera away from your eye to set the zoom, or use your right eye. Not a deal-breaker, by any means, but, again, an annoyance. diff --git a/SINAI-SA-corpus/4/ref1412_rate4.txt b/SINAI-SA-corpus/4/ref1412_rate4.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..3249b4048db01e566c80fa333c4ed5a84ffe1787 --- /dev/null +++ b/SINAI-SA-corpus/4/ref1412_rate4.txt @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ + Kodak 10X zoom digital camera, August 15, 2005 + ByCharles R. Clark "Bob Clark" (Long Island, NY) - See all my reviews +The camera works perfectly and is easy to use, as well as easy to set up the software on the PC. The only downside may be the lack of image stabilzation. Inside pictures using a flash were blurred on a number of shots, however that could be because the setting I was using was not the correct one or that I did not hold the down the shutter for focus before taking the picture. diff --git a/SINAI-SA-corpus/4/ref1416_rate4.txt b/SINAI-SA-corpus/4/ref1416_rate4.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..124d7f47f8b201131f19a6818df05e703e0c1393 --- /dev/null +++ b/SINAI-SA-corpus/4/ref1416_rate4.txt @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ + My first digital camera, July 6, 2006 + ByDennis Parker "Dionysius" (USA) - See all my reviews +Overall I'm very pleased with the Z740. In good lighting conditions everything works great. This camera is made for outside shots on a sunny day. But if you're inside with poor light you might run into a few problems with the zoom. It will take 5+ seconds to focus and even then the picture might turn out a little fuzzy. Don't get me wrong, the flash is very powerful. If you're not zoomed in it will take a perfect picture in complete darkness! The only other complaint I have is the lens cap will not stay on. Make sure you tie it to the strap or you'll probably end up loosing it. Lastly, the easyshare software that's included is great. Very easy to use and the options they give you to improve the quality of the picture actually work. I have paint shop pro X and it can't do some of the stuff the free Kodak program can. diff --git a/SINAI-SA-corpus/5/ref0_rate5.txt b/SINAI-SA-corpus/5/ref0_rate5.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..9c57d5849153519da2e4ea6d03ef14c82b4ee170 --- /dev/null +++ b/SINAI-SA-corpus/5/ref0_rate5.txt @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ + A camera that's powerful and a great value, March 5, 2008 + ByRLSd (Minnesota USA) - See all my reviews +I own a DSLR and consider myself a photography enthusiast. I wanted a small compact camera with me when I don't want to lug around my DSLR + lenses and equipment. After a previous good experience with the Canon A720 IS, the new A590 IS seemed like a good choice. Since I'm an advanced photographer, I'll focus on the advanced features of this camera. The auto modes work as well as any other camera in its class, but the extensive manual features is what sets apart the Canon A series. What I like about the camera: + Compact, stylish. It's smaller than older A Powershots, and the dark grey color gives it a seriousness compared to the typical bright silver finish. + Image stabilization works very well, it allows me to take blur-free photos 2-3 stops below the recommended shutter speed, that means at 35-50mm f2.8 1/10 sec shots are CONSISTENTLY possible indoors without using flash. + Good image quality. Expected from Canon, but even better is adjustable contrast, saturation, and sharpness settings, along with the typical JPG compression and resolution sizes. + Fast and responsive. I was surprised how responsive this camera is even compared with my DSLR. Shutter lag is very low for a compact digicam, and when I pre-focus with manual focus, it's even faster. + Manual modes. Aperture priority and shutter priority are great, the M mode is even better than other A Powershots such as the A720 because now there's a light meter on the right side that adjusts live based on what the camera thinks is the optimal exposure setting. And you can adjust aperture/shutter speed and see how it affects the final exposure. Ideally a live histogram would be even better, but this is very handy. + Manual focus. Although the LCD resolution is not good enough, even with the point zoom option, manual focus helps in close-up work and pre-focusing for action or creative photography. + Manual flash modes. In addition to automatic flash. The manual flash allows me to adjust the flash power in 3 levels, and prevents a pre-flash. This last part is important for using a remote optical slave flash. I can basically take professional looking studio pictures with this camera with my external flash equipment. + Optical viewfinder. I don't use this much yet, but can come in handy in bright sunlight conditions, or when battery conservation is needed. + Battery performance seems improved over previous A powershots too. The official specs give it 220 shots on regular alkalines and 500 on rechargeable NiMHs. Good news is they use common AA batteries that you can buy anywhere instead of proprietary models with specific chargers. Now the negatives. I hope Canon can improve these aspects in their future models. - Slow flash recycle times. This is to be expected from a camera that takes AA batteries. Would be nice if the LCD didn't blank out after a full flash discharge. Not a big deal since I use an external flash anyway, and the camera's flash is manually set to medium output as trigger (so recharge is faster). I would not want to give up the AA battery convenience for a faster flash recycle time though. - Higher resolution LCD. The 2.5" 115k resolution LCD is ok for framing and casual browsing, but higher resolution would be nice. -Live histogram while shooting. This feature is available when reviewing a photo, but not live. Other manufacturers have implemented this, and Canon should also, especially since the unofficial CHDK software mod allows such a feature. - Larger aperture would be nice. Such as f/2.0 (instead of f/2.6) at the wide end, and f/4.0 (instead of f/5.5) at the telephoto end. That way a lower ( less noisy) ISO can be used in dim conditions or when fast shutter speeds are needed to freeze action. All the electronics in the world can't replace a good large lens. Also allows more creative depth of field control. - A wider wideangle would be nice, 28mm instead of 35mm (35mm equiv). I'd rather see a wider wideangle than a longer zoom. - Video feature is not ideal. Optical zoom is not available during recording of video. And the more efficient MPEG4 compression is not used, so video files tend to be large. Also noticed at 640x480 resolution, the highest fps is now 20 instead of 30 from other A models. A definite step backwards. - Noise at higher ISOs. This is due to the smaller sensor on compact cameras. But 8 MP is probably the most pixels that can be crammed into a small 1/2.5" sensor. I'd rather have a cleaner picture at 6-7 MP than a noisy 8 MP picture. And if in-camera noise reduction is used, I'd like to see an adjustable setting for how much is being applied. - And if I were to be really critical: There's no indicator of what optical zoom level I'm at. Slight image noise is noticeable even at ISO 80 when I zoom in really close on a monitor view. When at the widest angle aperture, there's slight barrel distortion and blurriness on the corners. Not many compact cameras can do better in terms of image quality, but I'm pointing them out here because even though this camera beats most of the competition, it still has room for improvement. So overall it's a great camera for the price. Offering great image quality with the auto settings for the casual user, but also a powerful set of features for the more advanced photographer. diff --git a/SINAI-SA-corpus/5/ref1000_rate5.txt b/SINAI-SA-corpus/5/ref1000_rate5.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..b0dae23237bbbb4544e9f2870a37b9292324ed17 --- /dev/null +++ b/SINAI-SA-corpus/5/ref1000_rate5.txt @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ + Great, January 6, 2009 + ByD. C. Thomas (NH, CT) - See all my reviews +Great camera. This is my second one in this series, I just wanted to upgrade and it was well worth it. Couldn't be more reliable and durable(I'm not the most gentle/careful person in the world) For the price, you can't find a better quality camera. diff --git a/SINAI-SA-corpus/5/ref1002_rate5.txt b/SINAI-SA-corpus/5/ref1002_rate5.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..5f8cbae3c51170808c5ee736776689deb1d0c289 --- /dev/null +++ b/SINAI-SA-corpus/5/ref1002_rate5.txt @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ + Canon Power Shot, January 6, 2009 + ByChristopher K. Williams - See all my reviews +Very, Very Happy! I bought this camera for my wife for Christmas, actually I purchased the 1100 first and was equally pleased but the 770 through Amazon came out for $10 more than the 1100 and it is all silver with 10mp. I have enjoyed hers so much that I purchased a second for me so I could leave hers alone. The camera is light, small, pictures and videos are absolutely perfect, high quality and easy to use. diff --git a/SINAI-SA-corpus/5/ref1003_rate5.txt b/SINAI-SA-corpus/5/ref1003_rate5.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..9ce98a7c36c9ee1b547303d58fec05b187fbcd8c --- /dev/null +++ b/SINAI-SA-corpus/5/ref1003_rate5.txt @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ + Great Upgrade, January 6, 2009 + ByA. Hardman - See all my reviews +We bought this camera to replace our old Powershot that had the dreaded E18 error. The new camera cost less than the repair would have. We are so pleased with the improved features, in particular the quickness with which the camera focuses and takes a picture. In addition, the camera finds and focuses on the faces in a picture, et this does not create any delays. We have very many blurry pictures of our infant son because we had to take them without the flash. Now, we can capture the moment we really want, the way we want it to look. diff --git a/SINAI-SA-corpus/5/ref1004_rate5.txt b/SINAI-SA-corpus/5/ref1004_rate5.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..160e6817016a006d7f3078b9bad7bbf6505416b1 --- /dev/null +++ b/SINAI-SA-corpus/5/ref1004_rate5.txt @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ + Consumer report's Best buy camera, January 6, 2009 + ByKevin Fritts (Knoxville, tn) - See all my reviews +I bought this camera for my wife at Christmas after reading that it was Consumer Report's best buy camera. She is so happy now with it's picture quality. She had a Sony before and some of her pictures would turn out blurry. This camera has image stabilization which eliminates that. You won't find a better camera for the money. By the way, Amazon was $40 cheaper than Walmart. Buy it here. diff --git a/SINAI-SA-corpus/5/ref1006_rate5.txt b/SINAI-SA-corpus/5/ref1006_rate5.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..ffd1bf8eeff95d076f74e4e85081bee2844112a7 --- /dev/null +++ b/SINAI-SA-corpus/5/ref1006_rate5.txt @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ + the canon power shot SD1100Is, January 6, 2009 + ByWilliam D. Patrick (Fayetteville Georgia) - See all my reviews +A great Camera. Takes awesome pictures My daughter and son both love it My son wants one too but in a different color. A great value You won't regret buying this camera diff --git a/SINAI-SA-corpus/5/ref1008_rate5.txt b/SINAI-SA-corpus/5/ref1008_rate5.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..6fcc3e82859cfb2b50050d2b4b81828e166befe0 --- /dev/null +++ b/SINAI-SA-corpus/5/ref1008_rate5.txt @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ + Glad I did my homework!, January 5, 2009 + ByB. Sloan "Southern Soul" (Portland, TN USA) - See all my reviews +I did my homework when my old Samsung started going out. I looked at the newest Nikon CoolPix, Sony Cybershot, and the Canon SD1100, and after reading the reviews on CNET and playing with each camera in the store, I decided on the Canon. I love the features in this camera, especially the ability to swap colors and focus on one color while leaving the rest of the image b+w! For a amateur who loves to take pictures, this camera is great. The pictures here don't do the camera justice - the pink color is really pretty! I'm happy :) diff --git a/SINAI-SA-corpus/5/ref1009_rate5.txt b/SINAI-SA-corpus/5/ref1009_rate5.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..100ab07126d9160137a002d8bb8e27e1e57e05b3 --- /dev/null +++ b/SINAI-SA-corpus/5/ref1009_rate5.txt @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ + Must buy!!!!! The cool features are AMAZING!!!!!! Read the Manual, January 4, 2009 + ByHadassa "Smart Shopper" (Texas) - See all my reviews +Easy to use and the pictures are fantastic. Read your manual so that you know how to use the cool color features. I sat down and read the parts that I was interested in and about 15-20 minutes later I was set. Use the camera features. You would be surprised how many people don't use the night features and get terrible pictures at night and then complain that the pictures are awful--users fault not the camera. The price is so reasonable. I'm going to try and upload some pictures here of my black and white pictures with only the red color that I took in New York--so cool! diff --git a/SINAI-SA-corpus/5/ref100_rate5.txt b/SINAI-SA-corpus/5/ref100_rate5.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..60e45bdaefb582b961a8fcd11dfca2e76711c873 --- /dev/null +++ b/SINAI-SA-corpus/5/ref100_rate5.txt @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ + Very nice macro capability, January 3, 2009 + ByM. G. McCartney - See all my reviews +I am particularly interested in macros (close-ups), and wanted an easy, tote-along camera for hikes and other nature explorations. Couldn't be happier with the A590, and for the money, it can't be beat. See sample macro image of winterberries that I uploaded. Focuses down to 2". diff --git a/SINAI-SA-corpus/5/ref1011_rate5.txt b/SINAI-SA-corpus/5/ref1011_rate5.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..434dbf1fe534ed3c61d6c90fd177ea843965259c --- /dev/null +++ b/SINAI-SA-corpus/5/ref1011_rate5.txt @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ + great little camera, December 28, 2008 + ByBelinda Ischy - See all my reviews +This is a good little compact camera. I bought two of them, one in pink and one in brown for my grandson and granddaughter. They have no problems with taking the pics. Very user friendly and the pics come out great with the IS. He is 8 and she is 13. They take them every where they go. diff --git a/SINAI-SA-corpus/5/ref1013_rate5.txt b/SINAI-SA-corpus/5/ref1013_rate5.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..f900ee659be28140a174e943572774239aa9ecb9 --- /dev/null +++ b/SINAI-SA-corpus/5/ref1013_rate5.txt @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ + Great camera!, December 27, 2008 + ByLuvs Books (Pekin, IL United States) - See all my reviews +I love my Elph camera. I had an earlier model which I loved, but lost. This Elph is even better-better resolution and clarity. It fits easily in my purse so I can carry it everywhere. diff --git a/SINAI-SA-corpus/5/ref1015_rate5.txt b/SINAI-SA-corpus/5/ref1015_rate5.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..63a03f7a24abfda3461ee2597e3026e67b4b30f4 --- /dev/null +++ b/SINAI-SA-corpus/5/ref1015_rate5.txt @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ + Meme, December 27, 2008 + ByLinda H. Garner "Meme" - See all my reviews +I bought this camera for my adult daughter. It is easy to operate and takes great pictures. Glad I choose this camera. diff --git a/SINAI-SA-corpus/5/ref1016_rate5.txt b/SINAI-SA-corpus/5/ref1016_rate5.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..ba91dfc71338e564d0f8e519e4a4add4fac42e13 --- /dev/null +++ b/SINAI-SA-corpus/5/ref1016_rate5.txt @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ + great little camera, December 26, 2008 + ByS. Davis "good nurse" (missouri, usa) - See all my reviews +this is a great camera- takes beautiful pics & battery lasts a long time. i highly recommend it! diff --git a/SINAI-SA-corpus/5/ref1017_rate5.txt b/SINAI-SA-corpus/5/ref1017_rate5.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..94bea4f5e7f0f292b978d59923f4976a27a42b74 --- /dev/null +++ b/SINAI-SA-corpus/5/ref1017_rate5.txt @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ + Canon PowerShot SD1100IS, December 26, 2008 + ByJ. Grant (Colorado Springs) - See all my reviews +Great still and video quality in this small camera. Liked it enough to purchase a second one so both of us good have one. diff --git a/SINAI-SA-corpus/5/ref1018_rate5.txt b/SINAI-SA-corpus/5/ref1018_rate5.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..a7a8eff8a512c3f98a5dd360d42a8cce43133540 --- /dev/null +++ b/SINAI-SA-corpus/5/ref1018_rate5.txt @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ + Amazing Product, December 25, 2008 + ByN. Nelli (Faifax VA USA) - See all my reviews +This little sleek and powerful camera is the best in small camera category and the easy to use features are the best quality of this small wonder and the best part it fits every one's pocket it is one of the products you must have diff --git a/SINAI-SA-corpus/5/ref101_rate5.txt b/SINAI-SA-corpus/5/ref101_rate5.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..f8aef48ab3a1ead9ee54edab8b1b19d6ebdb8951 --- /dev/null +++ b/SINAI-SA-corpus/5/ref101_rate5.txt @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ + Point and shoot, December 29, 2008 + ByJarott Usher "aguywithglasses" (Belize) - See all my reviews +great point and shoot cam. comes with a lot of features that i dont even know how to use but it makes you want to learn an experiment with different settings. after you take a pic it takes about 1.7 secs until you can take another. controls are sooo easy and spread out. you can hook it str8 to your tv and see your pics before you uplead them to your pc. while the cam is connected to the tv you can take pics and it will preview them. very crisp images (3264x2448 res). bought it for my lil sis for christmas. she is 13 and found it very easy to use. like i said...point and shoot. buy it diff --git a/SINAI-SA-corpus/5/ref1020_rate5.txt b/SINAI-SA-corpus/5/ref1020_rate5.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..06848c793c0a3d2020d0333ad24519b6a0503d34 --- /dev/null +++ b/SINAI-SA-corpus/5/ref1020_rate5.txt @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ + Great Little Camera, December 23, 2008 + ByFatOrangeTabby (Lansing, MI) - See all my reviews +What can I say that hasn't already been said? This is my fourth digital camera in the span of about four years, and my first subcompact camera. I have used Sony, Kodak, and Polaroid cameras and the Canon is by far the best as far as image quality and durability. I love that it fits right in my pocket and I don't have to haul around a camera bag. It doesn't weight down my purse if I want to carry it in there. It's pink. It's made of sturdy metal instead of plastic, like my other three cameras were. The buttons feel sturdy and it has a super-easy user interface. It takes great photos, and I was even brave enough to take it out of auto mode with the help of the instruction manual. One thing I love about Canon is that instead of cramming all the different manuals (language wise) into one booklet, there is a booklet especially for English! This means I can discard the other book and only have one small manual to put in my camera bag. I suggest going to a store and handling it a little bit before ordering to make sure it isn't too small for your hands. I have larger hands and it seems to work OK for me, but I can see how some people might not like the size if they are used to a larger camera. It is always a good idea to look at electronics in person before buying, but the prices in the stores were much higher than Amazon. I was not able to see the camera in pink in the store, so I was a little concerned that it would be too pink or not pink enough. It ended up being a great color, not so pink as to be annoying or to stand out. It doesn't look like a toy. Macro mode is excellent, and battery life is great. I love that it has image stabilization built right in because it means that I have fewer blurry images to delete. A perfect camera to carry with you everywhere! diff --git a/SINAI-SA-corpus/5/ref1021_rate5.txt b/SINAI-SA-corpus/5/ref1021_rate5.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..87f91bf9f11212470a774153b0f1ce8d7137ba9a --- /dev/null +++ b/SINAI-SA-corpus/5/ref1021_rate5.txt @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ + Great Package, December 23, 2008 + ByC. Wong "carriewly" (buffalo, NY USA) - See all my reviews +I bought this for my husband for his Christmas present. Don't think he'll like the fact that it's pink in color but for an extra 10 dollars for a photo printer he will just have to accept it. I've always been a strong supporter of canon cameras. We have had a canon ixus 40 for more than 4 years now and it still works fine. Just wanted an upgrade. Seems the new model is a little flimsier than the one we have. The switch for switching between viewing, camera and video mode is made of plastic and is recessed. I find this makes it a little difficult to switch modes quickly and more inconvenient. The battery cover is also made of plastic now and seems like it would snap off very easily if you were too rough with it. I have yet to test it fully but i don't think it'll be much of a disappointment. It came highly recommended from a guy who owns a camera shop. Plus canon cameras are the best in low light situations (for point-and-shoots). Great price with the photo printer bundle. Can't wait to use it. diff --git a/SINAI-SA-corpus/5/ref1023_rate5.txt b/SINAI-SA-corpus/5/ref1023_rate5.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..675f8a6bb9f023861d28903e59620195c7b32e46 --- /dev/null +++ b/SINAI-SA-corpus/5/ref1023_rate5.txt @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ + Great camera, December 22, 2008 + ByAmie J. Tacka "tick-tack" (Philadelphia, PA) - See all my reviews +I've had 3 different cameras in the last 2 years - it's a long story. I did a lot of research this time before picking a new one. This little camera is really great and all the reviews were right on. It takes great pictures and the quality is better than any of my previous cameras. It is easy to use and really good in terms of battery life. I don't think I will ever use some of the features but they are fun to experiment with. I've recommended this camera to 2 co-workers and would recommend it to anyone who needs a great camera at a great price. diff --git a/SINAI-SA-corpus/5/ref1024_rate5.txt b/SINAI-SA-corpus/5/ref1024_rate5.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..7849abaf51f09789abfc4cc9b155e505eb2fe496 --- /dev/null +++ b/SINAI-SA-corpus/5/ref1024_rate5.txt @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ + Great Camera, December 22, 2008 + ByFrank E. Seper (Shawboro, NC) - See all my reviews +Bought it a month ago and so far we love it. The size is perfect for carrying around, fits right in your pocket, and it takes great pictures. For the money, this is a great camera. I have no complaints about it at all. diff --git a/SINAI-SA-corpus/5/ref1025_rate5.txt b/SINAI-SA-corpus/5/ref1025_rate5.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..9490f3c6ed5e593c91bdb3ea27577715c3263883 --- /dev/null +++ b/SINAI-SA-corpus/5/ref1025_rate5.txt @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ + Canon Powershot SD1100IS, December 22, 2008 + Byjunior "jr" (kentucky) - See all my reviews +This is a great camera in a small package. Very impressed with ease of use, quality of pictures, and with an inexpensive SD card the storage is more than adequate. I would definitely recommend this camera to a friend. diff --git a/SINAI-SA-corpus/5/ref1027_rate5.txt b/SINAI-SA-corpus/5/ref1027_rate5.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..6781cc43e53baa2357f1a7805a65476d9142d3d3 --- /dev/null +++ b/SINAI-SA-corpus/5/ref1027_rate5.txt @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ + Nice Little Camera, December 22, 2008 + ByTom M (Brookfield, IL USA) - See all my reviews +Purchased as a gift for my wife and she loves it. It's small but very sturdy feeling and comfortable to hold and use. Easy to figure out and takes great pictures in full auto. diff --git a/SINAI-SA-corpus/5/ref1028_rate5.txt b/SINAI-SA-corpus/5/ref1028_rate5.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..b622df9b85af80a82bef40e030386187a336b739 --- /dev/null +++ b/SINAI-SA-corpus/5/ref1028_rate5.txt @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ + Great camera for the money!!!, December 21, 2008 + ByCanon fan (Austin, Texas) - See all my reviews + I bought this camera for my wife. She wanted an easy to use point and shoot that delivers great pictures. She also wanted a compact size to drop in her purse so that it was with her at all times. The Canon PoweShot SD1100IS filled the bill perfectly. I checked all brand of cameras in this range and read both user and expert reviews. I am a fan of having a viewfinder as are many who have ever tried to see an LCD under bright light conditions. Many cameras in the range do not offer viewfinders. I also liked the 4X optical zoom. I settled on this camera and it has been the perfect pick. It is as simple as anyone could want and still offers flexibility for those who want to have more control of their pictures. I would recommend this camera to anyone wanting a basic point and shoot with great results. diff --git a/SINAI-SA-corpus/5/ref1029_rate5.txt b/SINAI-SA-corpus/5/ref1029_rate5.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..e5fbacf0a72f775d4d80ef82f9600a712ea97c5f --- /dev/null +++ b/SINAI-SA-corpus/5/ref1029_rate5.txt @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ + easy as pie, December 21, 2008 + ByC. Frankel (new york city) - See all my reviews +So happy to have finally found a camera with easy to understand instructions and picture perfect photos to boot! Dd a lot of research and was not disappointed in the PowerShot SD1100IS 8MP. Light and compact, it's easy to carry everywhere you go. Just be sure to use the wrist cord because I did find the surface of the camera to be a bit sleek and almost dropped it a few times. Would recommend this camera in a heart beat! diff --git a/SINAI-SA-corpus/5/ref102_rate5.txt b/SINAI-SA-corpus/5/ref102_rate5.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..6c7759f3f5332e1234ebe097c0856c27597f2918 --- /dev/null +++ b/SINAI-SA-corpus/5/ref102_rate5.txt @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ + Canon 590, December 28, 2008 + ByM. Chan "The Moose" (New York City) - See all my reviews +I love this canon 590 camera. it has all the features like red eye reduction, night scenes, and all type of season you can take pictures with. i would recommend this product b/c the value is great. diff --git a/SINAI-SA-corpus/5/ref1030_rate5.txt b/SINAI-SA-corpus/5/ref1030_rate5.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..4273357b821d7263ea8d8b89a1419e4c5aaa13aa --- /dev/null +++ b/SINAI-SA-corpus/5/ref1030_rate5.txt @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ + Awesome little camera, December 21, 2008 + ByPlato "Plato" (New Jersey) - See all my reviews +This is everything I wanted in a sub compact camera....you tell the camera how good a picture you want to take and it does the rest...even the video comes out clean and clear with ease. Taking pictures in dark places, the pic comes out a little grainy, but it's still there. Before taking any picturs, you tell the camera what you want, the kind of light your in, etc.etc. and it does the rest. Pics are clean, clear and beautiful. I'll never own another camera unless it's a subcompact and canon makes the best diff --git a/SINAI-SA-corpus/5/ref1031_rate5.txt b/SINAI-SA-corpus/5/ref1031_rate5.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..fd482c14732c28c42a3625085fab50499812ce63 --- /dev/null +++ b/SINAI-SA-corpus/5/ref1031_rate5.txt @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ + Canon Camera, December 20, 2008 + ByT. Cady "Tracy2047" (Colorado) - See all my reviews +I really like this camera! I bought one like it last year but my husband lost it. I bought this one in pink so I knew he wouldn't use it. I received it extremely quick so that I could use it for the Holidays. Thanks Amazon!! diff --git a/SINAI-SA-corpus/5/ref1033_rate5.txt b/SINAI-SA-corpus/5/ref1033_rate5.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..2ec0a6b928dc7a0ddab54895e021781028770c47 --- /dev/null +++ b/SINAI-SA-corpus/5/ref1033_rate5.txt @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ + Great camera for the price, December 16, 2008 + ByNestor Jarquin Zeas (USA) - See all my reviews +This is a great camera, I mean for 150 something dollars this is an awesome deal. The package and shipping was excellent. Once I opened the product I fell in love with it. The camera feels strong (not cheap), it has great functions and the pictures have a very good quality. I think you get everything you pay for and little more!!! If you have a doubt about this camera, forget about it... Strongly Recommend... diff --git a/SINAI-SA-corpus/5/ref1034_rate5.txt b/SINAI-SA-corpus/5/ref1034_rate5.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..b0d3430e9960485b9072cbd1a6373945d7294b8f --- /dev/null +++ b/SINAI-SA-corpus/5/ref1034_rate5.txt @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ + Great Camera!, December 16, 2008 + ByC. Bethke (WI) - See all my reviews +Just purchased this camera as a replacement for an older HP camera we have. I have to say that I love this camera! We read about the great reviews for it on Amazon and it was also ranked very well by Consumer Reports. The camera takes great photos at night. We were in NYC over the weekend and I am so impressed with the crispness of our photos. Both the daytime and the nightime photos look great. We are only amateurs photographers. I like that this camera is very small and can fit in your pocket. It's not much bigger than our cell phone. We made a great decision. It is the best camera we have owned. diff --git a/SINAI-SA-corpus/5/ref1035_rate5.txt b/SINAI-SA-corpus/5/ref1035_rate5.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..d40b40809e926756f879f706709aa2123e6aaaa9 --- /dev/null +++ b/SINAI-SA-corpus/5/ref1035_rate5.txt @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ + Cannon Powershot., December 16, 2008 + ByLynda Deary (Utah) - See all my reviews +I have traveled the world with this camera. Its reliable. I love the feature of the rechargabel battery! It takes great pictures. I love some of the great fetures in the menu options. All and All A great digital camera. No Complaints here! diff --git a/SINAI-SA-corpus/5/ref1036_rate5.txt b/SINAI-SA-corpus/5/ref1036_rate5.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..241faa5a5bd89ed4c71c7d1340b8e96876c71fdb --- /dev/null +++ b/SINAI-SA-corpus/5/ref1036_rate5.txt @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ + Great buy!, December 16, 2008 + ByCristi Jessee Applegate (Sacramento, CA) - See all my reviews +I am very happy with this camera. It is great. Good buy, good price. diff --git a/SINAI-SA-corpus/5/ref1037_rate5.txt b/SINAI-SA-corpus/5/ref1037_rate5.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..9b4150413630bad6a4fcf13ab14995404a267d50 --- /dev/null +++ b/SINAI-SA-corpus/5/ref1037_rate5.txt @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ + Great little point and shoot, December 16, 2008 + ByMerrick (NY) - See all my reviews +Pros: Small, good detail, nice clear LCD Cons: Typical Point and Shoot shutter slowness (to be expected) I own a dslr but wanted a smaller point and shoot I could keep in my coat pocket. This certainly fills the bill. It also has a neat feature where looking at the lcd in portrait or landscap orientation will automatically rotate the picture you are reviewing to match. diff --git a/SINAI-SA-corpus/5/ref1038_rate5.txt b/SINAI-SA-corpus/5/ref1038_rate5.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..b2c3fe85da6f7297ca5d5fca6326680a7d577cc9 --- /dev/null +++ b/SINAI-SA-corpus/5/ref1038_rate5.txt @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ + Great camera - better than the SD600 series, December 16, 2008 + ByMike Lunt (Austin, TX) - See all my reviews +This camera is a big step above the previous cameras like the SD600. There is less chance of blur due to motion, and it is much faster. I have owned these PowerShot cameras for years and will continue to upgrade every 2-3 years. diff --git a/SINAI-SA-corpus/5/ref1039_rate5.txt b/SINAI-SA-corpus/5/ref1039_rate5.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..116a214aa563e4075a8dffbe451d03ebe7efa483 --- /dev/null +++ b/SINAI-SA-corpus/5/ref1039_rate5.txt @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ + Great little camera, December 16, 2008 + Bycatfishmass (Phoenix, AZ) - See all my reviews +What started as a quest to buy a mini-camcorder, ended with the purchase of this Canon. My husband wanted something small that he could shoot video with ... I couldn't get past the horrible photo quality of your average camcorder. This Canon does is all with aplomb, even in low-light conditions. Not bad for a camera that can get lost in a pocket. diff --git a/SINAI-SA-corpus/5/ref1040_rate5.txt b/SINAI-SA-corpus/5/ref1040_rate5.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..dd77cb6a8b09044234da7a440f866ba5f3cb3206 --- /dev/null +++ b/SINAI-SA-corpus/5/ref1040_rate5.txt @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ + Great camera, great price!, December 16, 2008 + ByToffee (Odessa, TX USA) - See all my reviews +I got this camera for my husband on the occasion of the birth of our 2nd child. Picture quality is excellent and he has even shot some videos. Easy to use and download to computer. His only complaint is that it is small and easy to misplace! It is amazing how far camera technology has come. My old camera (canon powershot 4 years old) is much bulkier! Canon lenses are always high quality. diff --git a/SINAI-SA-corpus/5/ref1041_rate5.txt b/SINAI-SA-corpus/5/ref1041_rate5.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..587ea71f5697919e5b511c0da246abbb6ecacf52 --- /dev/null +++ b/SINAI-SA-corpus/5/ref1041_rate5.txt @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ + Love it!, December 16, 2008 + ByD. Wohlk "ddw" (atlanta) - See all my reviews +Just got this camera and couldn't be happier. I am not a pro photographer in any way but really do appreciate all the features on this camera. Quite simply it has a solid feel to it and it takes great pictures. diff --git a/SINAI-SA-corpus/5/ref1043_rate5.txt b/SINAI-SA-corpus/5/ref1043_rate5.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..19f76dd415174f81b363aa8de40ad9616ff20226 --- /dev/null +++ b/SINAI-SA-corpus/5/ref1043_rate5.txt @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ + SD1100 canon camera, December 16, 2008 + BySusan G. St Pierre (Newburgh, NY United States) - See all my reviews +I love the ease of use . I have now ordered 3 from amazon. I will be giving them as gifts for Christmas. diff --git a/SINAI-SA-corpus/5/ref1044_rate5.txt b/SINAI-SA-corpus/5/ref1044_rate5.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..26bd920407331f4a587fe94f83492511ba449ffa --- /dev/null +++ b/SINAI-SA-corpus/5/ref1044_rate5.txt @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ + Love my new canon, December 16, 2008 + ByDee Gee "dee" (Marlton, New Jersey United States) - See all my reviews +I bought this camera as an update to my old canon that only had 2 mega pixels. I use it to photograph jewelry which I sell online and it takes beautiful shots in natural light on macro mode. It's also super easy to use and download to my mac computer. One negative is the low memory card that comes with it. I had to buy more memory, but it was still the best deal that I've seen this holiday season. I would definitely recommend it. diff --git a/SINAI-SA-corpus/5/ref1046_rate5.txt b/SINAI-SA-corpus/5/ref1046_rate5.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..21bf8ce05ea8f2598943d663d93a3310dd815a17 --- /dev/null +++ b/SINAI-SA-corpus/5/ref1046_rate5.txt @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ + Love this camera!, December 13, 2008 + Bysawman (USA) - See all my reviews +I love this camera. My Olympus C-750 I still haven't figured out how to take pictures without half of them being blurry after more than two years. The Canon I figured out in hours and it takes great pictures. The menus are very intuitive and easy to navigate. The LCD is bigger and the body much smaller than the C-750. Only thing it doesn't have is the 10X zoom, only 3x. From off to taking a shot is less than two seconds with the Canon where the Olympus took forever to turn on and had a terrible shutter lag. The Canon was also less than half the price of the Olympus, a big plus. diff --git a/SINAI-SA-corpus/5/ref1047_rate5.txt b/SINAI-SA-corpus/5/ref1047_rate5.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..fa9116bb46489ab76085e18d1bec249d4322ad14 --- /dev/null +++ b/SINAI-SA-corpus/5/ref1047_rate5.txt @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ + Great camera!, December 12, 2008 + ByFrank Mcnally (United States) - See all my reviews +This camera is exactly what I was looking for! It is small enough for me to stick into my pocket and carry around everywhere, and it takes great pictures! diff --git a/SINAI-SA-corpus/5/ref1048_rate5.txt b/SINAI-SA-corpus/5/ref1048_rate5.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..a6a88801413d021a1cbd9c2c5fd581b26c990ea2 --- /dev/null +++ b/SINAI-SA-corpus/5/ref1048_rate5.txt @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ + One of the best!, December 12, 2008 + ByA. J. Kollasch (Belmond IA, USA) - See all my reviews +Compared to my previous three digital cameras, the last one also a Canon Powershot, the Canon PowerShot SD1100 Elph has a much higher pixel count, an optical zoom, image stabilization, face recognition for focus and much more compact size. The price is reasonable for what you get. I haven't even tried the video mode. This also is the first digital camera I feel comfortable carrying around in my pocket as easily as a cell phone. diff --git a/SINAI-SA-corpus/5/ref1049_rate5.txt b/SINAI-SA-corpus/5/ref1049_rate5.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..314fee034ac005dfeede0aa9ce7f329b3ee96206 --- /dev/null +++ b/SINAI-SA-corpus/5/ref1049_rate5.txt @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ + Perfect Pocket Camera, December 12, 2008 + BySamantha Testman (NJ) - See all my reviews +I got this to always be able to have a camera around to get shots and it slips easily into my purse or coat pocket so I do not have to miss a special shot. The pictures come out great and I have some photos that I would otherwise have missed. Great to have. diff --git a/SINAI-SA-corpus/5/ref104_rate5.txt b/SINAI-SA-corpus/5/ref104_rate5.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..112c378130e0679ce3702d06ef2e6caf59cd79e5 --- /dev/null +++ b/SINAI-SA-corpus/5/ref104_rate5.txt @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ + LOVED it!, December 28, 2008 + ByM. Marini (Boca Raton, Fl) - See all my reviews +Everything I wanted and more. Sturdy grip, regular viewfinder for sunny florida days and amazing quality photos. diff --git a/SINAI-SA-corpus/5/ref1050_rate5.txt b/SINAI-SA-corpus/5/ref1050_rate5.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..4c6a1bb20f051af107fd3123b1d8f9bec2b5826a --- /dev/null +++ b/SINAI-SA-corpus/5/ref1050_rate5.txt @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ + The Best Point-and-Shoot Digital Camera, April 15, 2008 + ByDavid Henderson "David" (Arlington, Virginia) - See all my reviews +As publisher of BoomerCafe.com, the online magazine for baby boomers with active lifestyles, I evaluated point-and-shoot digital cameras under $300, carefully examined photos using Aperture on Apple Mac and came to the conclusion that the Canon SD1100 is tops ... the best. It's better that Canon's more expensive SD870. [...] diff --git a/SINAI-SA-corpus/5/ref1059_rate5.txt b/SINAI-SA-corpus/5/ref1059_rate5.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..9f480f3167e9a5a60f9e2580416e3be44d6f9f81 --- /dev/null +++ b/SINAI-SA-corpus/5/ref1059_rate5.txt @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ + Great Camera for Making Video Clips, August 29, 2008 + ByAnon, Arlington, VA - See all my reviews +I have no idea why this is the case, but the picture quality on the video clips I make of my baby using this camera are better/sharper/clearer than the HD-Canon Vixia and other High-Def. cameras (such as the Pentax)...confusing since a lot of other cameras I've tried have either similar or even better specifications, so I was very surprised to find this to be the case. Anyways, I'm really, really, glad I found this camera. I just love it! I have a Nikon D40 for most of my pictures of the baby, but this is the compact camera I keep in my purse with me at all times--and it is perfect for me. diff --git a/SINAI-SA-corpus/5/ref105_rate5.txt b/SINAI-SA-corpus/5/ref105_rate5.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..74a858ae3043585d6ad542f183ffc27a63a2c04d --- /dev/null +++ b/SINAI-SA-corpus/5/ref105_rate5.txt @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ + Great Starter Camera for Budding Photographers!, December 28, 2008 + BySteven D. Ayers (MI,USA) - See all my reviews +We bought this camera for our 12 year old son this year because he loves using ours and he also loves making silly videos, so we thought about getting a kids cam for him at first, but the reviews for them were horrible, so we checked all over Amazon and found this one to have the best overall rating. I have to say that everyone was right on target with this one. I'm not a camra geek or a professional photographer, but this is a really nice camera, even for an adult. It takes great pics in the dark and obviously in the light. The video quality is nice and I like that it doesn't have a "swing" out view window that could possibly be broken off. I gave this camera a 5* because it's just an awesome well made camera for just about anyone. diff --git a/SINAI-SA-corpus/5/ref1060_rate5.txt b/SINAI-SA-corpus/5/ref1060_rate5.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..6657258a7a0229c35fd74f152fa42e528a8e4f74 --- /dev/null +++ b/SINAI-SA-corpus/5/ref1060_rate5.txt @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ + Awesome little point and shoot., December 12, 2008 + ByB. Cox - See all my reviews +While looking for a replacement for my broken Canon 450D (My own fault: I lived on the beach for 8 weeks and didn't protect it well enough), I came across the entry for the Powershot SD1100IS, and was immediately interested. It cost about my price range, came with everything I was used to, and had some pretty good reviews. So far, it has been a great deal. I get great photographs with really good resolution. You have to be very careful about not bumping the lens, as sometimes it will get stuck in a focus loop and you'll have to restart the camera, but that seems pretty standard for a semi-delicate piece of equipment. I am completely satisfied with my new little point-and-shoot! diff --git a/SINAI-SA-corpus/5/ref1062_rate5.txt b/SINAI-SA-corpus/5/ref1062_rate5.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..0266ec60da2cf87d2c270e802bc7f2a016094fc4 --- /dev/null +++ b/SINAI-SA-corpus/5/ref1062_rate5.txt @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ + Beautiful Brown Color!!!!!, December 12, 2008 + ByLuv2shop (Chicago) - See all my reviews +I just got this camera yesterday after my sony cybershot was stolen. I have to say this canon model is waaaay better than my sony cybershot(although the cybershot was 3 yrs old). The canon has better features and takes better pictures. Plus you cant beat this price on amazon. I got this camera in bohemian brown, and wow it is gorgeous!!!! Its sophisticated looking. I didnt want silver because everyone has silver and the pink and blue are pretty, but wow the brown is nice. Its a deep chocolate brown with a hint of eggplant. Anyways, my favorite feature is color accent! My sony cybershot did not have that. But all in all, amazing camera for the person in their 20's who want to use it for going out or for vacations. although its fine for all ages. Dont hestitate, after so much researching this camera is worth it for the price range. diff --git a/SINAI-SA-corpus/5/ref1063_rate5.txt b/SINAI-SA-corpus/5/ref1063_rate5.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..9d25de07301a3f364ef334b295da1663b2a75aed --- /dev/null +++ b/SINAI-SA-corpus/5/ref1063_rate5.txt @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ + Very Happy with the camera, December 12, 2008 + ByMary Beth Domaz "Lovestotravel" - See all my reviews +We are very happy with this purchase so far. Camera is easy to use and we find the manuals very user friendly. We especially like the viewfinder. After borrowing our son's pocket camera for a recent vacation, we knew we needed a viewfinder. His did not have one and on sunny days it was very difficult to tell what you were taking a photo of. Although you don't often need the viewfinder, it is definitely a plus in our mind. We also like that it has the rechargable battery. We bought an extra battery so we will not be caught without a charged battery. Although some like regular batteries, I feel it is too much waste and too many batteries being tossed in landfills. We feel we made a good choice with this camera. It has lots of features and is easy to use. diff --git a/SINAI-SA-corpus/5/ref1064_rate5.txt b/SINAI-SA-corpus/5/ref1064_rate5.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..72bcdd3dfcd34abb2ad87b3b8f2a71c2deb55cb9 --- /dev/null +++ b/SINAI-SA-corpus/5/ref1064_rate5.txt @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ + Great little camera, December 12, 2008 + ByT. Stratton (Chambersburg, PA USA) - See all my reviews +I have always been partial to Canon cameras. Almost every product test or review I read gave this model best buy, or very high ratings. (I also have a Canon DSLR). It's small, shirt pocket size, very capable and easy to use. Produces great pictures. I had admired this camera when it was priced much higher. When I saw it on an Amazon special price, I grabbed it. Just love it. diff --git a/SINAI-SA-corpus/5/ref1065_rate5.txt b/SINAI-SA-corpus/5/ref1065_rate5.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..1667b545aa96127fc769618bba5aaa249291d87d --- /dev/null +++ b/SINAI-SA-corpus/5/ref1065_rate5.txt @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ + Excellent Camera......My friends beg for me to carry it!, December 8, 2008 + ByUnbiased Reviewer - See all my reviews +I absolutely love this camera. I purchased the Canon PowerShot 1100IS after carrying my Fuji SLR for years. I had no problems with the SLR, but it was entirely too bulky. Therefore, I wanted something that gave me similar picture quality from my SLR, but in a compact. After doing a little research, I purchased the 1100IS. This has been a purchase that I have not regretted. The camera has great manual controls which allow you to keep customize settings such as white balance, flash, timers, etc. Another feature I like is the way the screen changes depending on the way you have oriented the camera. My friends love when I carry this camera because it takes such good pictures. Everyone who I send pictures of themselves or who I've allowed to use the camera to take pictures wants to know where I got my camera. I have had 2 or 3 express interest in going to purchase this camera. You will not be dissappointed with this camera! diff --git a/SINAI-SA-corpus/5/ref1066_rate5.txt b/SINAI-SA-corpus/5/ref1066_rate5.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..acda306cddf226ca75e3877ec50d6941d52933ff --- /dev/null +++ b/SINAI-SA-corpus/5/ref1066_rate5.txt @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ + Camera, December 8, 2008 + ByKristin Egan "keeegan" (Chicago, IL) - See all my reviews +Selected cheapest shipping method, and it arrived the next day! excelent service and the camera is a replacement for my previous SD 1000, which I also loved. Camera doesn't wash people out and takes excelent pictures for a point & shoot. diff --git a/SINAI-SA-corpus/5/ref1068_rate5.txt b/SINAI-SA-corpus/5/ref1068_rate5.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..9bbccfdd4c8e82d1de7b163a48b5b6f54e54db0b --- /dev/null +++ b/SINAI-SA-corpus/5/ref1068_rate5.txt @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ + Nice little camera, December 6, 2008 + ByFamily Doctor (CARROLL, IA United States) - See all my reviews +I bought this camera for my wife who hasn't had a digital camera, would occasionally use a little black film camera for snapshots. All the kids (now college or past) have the predecessor for this model and love it. It's easy to use, intuitive, although it is unlikely she'll ever whoot video with it. She'll rely on me to download and Photoshop the results, but it'll be invaluable when she takes that cruise with her sister and mother this winter. It fits right in a pocket, and our son's underwater case will work for those snorkeling pictures. diff --git a/SINAI-SA-corpus/5/ref1069_rate5.txt b/SINAI-SA-corpus/5/ref1069_rate5.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..a236831c68ba9f0e8ae6bceda51a109f80d923a2 --- /dev/null +++ b/SINAI-SA-corpus/5/ref1069_rate5.txt @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ + Great resolution, close-ups and usability, December 6, 2008 + ByA. Chow "wonderland62" (Lafayette, IN USA) - See all my reviews +We did close-up photos on flowers and even hair and eyelashes and it's amazing what resolution we had with the camera and with such clarity. The camera is easy to use and is small sleek and compact. I got the one in brown and it looks unique and sohpisticated without looking too overly girly or masculine. Sound quality through the video recording was crisp and images were nice and clear and not at all pixelated. Definitely a good buy and well worth the money. diff --git a/SINAI-SA-corpus/5/ref106_rate5.txt b/SINAI-SA-corpus/5/ref106_rate5.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..fe7f4fd4afa02d52721f848197cfd1d04a7a6779 --- /dev/null +++ b/SINAI-SA-corpus/5/ref106_rate5.txt @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ + Canon PowerShot A590IS is AWESOME!, December 26, 2008 + ByR. H. Wims "Mom2ChanceChris" (Gainesville, FL) - See all my reviews +This is a phenomenal camera! Photos are crisp with excellent clarity. So many features I've had to refer to the manual on many occasions however, being a camera novice it is pretty user friendly. I'm still adjusting to all the capabilities and excited about taking the camera when I deliver our second baby in January! diff --git a/SINAI-SA-corpus/5/ref1070_rate5.txt b/SINAI-SA-corpus/5/ref1070_rate5.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..7ed70b5f336d480f4d2837a8b863989d49bda2c8 --- /dev/null +++ b/SINAI-SA-corpus/5/ref1070_rate5.txt @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ + Great tiny little camera, August 11, 2008 + ByH. Cochrane (NY, NY) - See all my reviews +I got this camera a little over a month ago. I still have a lot to learn. I like to try and play around with buttons and features before reading the manual. I still haven't read a lot of the manual so this is just from experience. Cannons are excellent cameras. The only reason i decided to replace my older cannon was because I am getting married, going to Hawaii and I wanted something a little newer/better for the trip of a lifetime. My old cannon still works fine and i plan on keeping it as a backup. Ok- on to my review. Battery life is excellent. I had the camera for over a month, used it a lot (especially playing around with the new features) and finally just had to charge the battery. I bought a spare battery so i never missed a shot. The flash is great- I seem to always have red eyes in every photo when a flash is used - this one is one of the better red eye reductions. I only had red eyes in about half the shots (which for me is great) There are a ton of different options as to how you can take your photo, (indoor, outdoor, beach, sunrise, color swap, fireworks, pets, kids etc etc) I thought this was neat, but according to my friend who is an artist, this is just a gag they use to sell more features. If you put your camera on "auto" it does all of the same things. I haven't experimented enough to say if this is true or not. I love the size of the screen - its definitely larger viewing then my old cannon however it still has a viewfinder - which i find important when owning a camera - sometimes in the dark, using the big screen is useless, you can't see anything on it, or sometimes when you ask other people to take a picture of you - they are not used to using a digital camera yet- this allows them to use the viewfinder like a regular camera and take a decent photo. Also if you god-forbid drop your camera on vacation and the screen breaks, you have a back up till you get home (i've seen this happen to people) Transferring photos to my iphoto program in my mac is really simple, just plug in and it goes! I have only played around with the video function a bit. I think it seems fine. If i wanted to take really nice videos i would use a video camera, but for an on the spot use- this is a great little video camera too! Thats all i can think of for now. Cannons never disappoint in my experience! diff --git a/SINAI-SA-corpus/5/ref1071_rate5.txt b/SINAI-SA-corpus/5/ref1071_rate5.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..06b1c887955bc89e4fb642b22c69b6db3c14b219 --- /dev/null +++ b/SINAI-SA-corpus/5/ref1071_rate5.txt @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ + Excellent, ultra compact, point & shoot camera! , July 7, 2008 + ByPeppermintPatti "Gina" (N.E. MS USA) - See all my reviews + If you are looking for a user friendly, easy to carry, point & shoot right out of the box-with the option to learn the more advanced features later, this is the camera for you! It is small enough to carry in your pocket but has enough weight to prove it's quality, comes with a wrist strap to prevent dropping it, a memory card, battery with a charger, cables & software to get you hooked up to a computer & a photo printer, and manuals that give clear, precise instructions on how to quick start and then later delve deeper into the capabilities of this exceptional little wonder! Need more info? Read "solid ultra compact camera" by Garrett Lowenthal. No one could have covered it better-his review was by far the most helpful. I love it-don't know how I ever did without it! *****Update: 9/15/08...Been using this camera long enough now to give more details! Extremely long battery life! But you may want to keep a backup charged for longer photo shoots. Depending on the size of your memory card, you can record like a camcorder! It will keep recording until the memory card is full! I've read that a 4gb memory card will hold two solid hours of video(?). Again, keep a spare handy because you will get carried away shooting everything everywhere! Printing pictures is super easy! If you don't have a photo printer or a computer with a quality printer, take it to any of the local Wal-marts, Walgreens, etc.. Pull the mem card from the camera, insert into the kiosk, make your choices. Burn your pics to a disk (save them) so you can reuse that mem card, if you like. It's that easy! Print out immediately or submit a three day order for .15 cent prints! These services also allow you to alter your photos before printing (borders, cropping, size, zoom in and eliminate extraneous background clutter-result is georgeous thanks to 8 megapixels, color or redeye correction that didn't happen during shooting-rare but it can happen, etc.). Point, shoot, keep or trash it and shoot again! Or, fill up your card and sort out the good ones later! It is so easy! I'm going to buy another one for my son! FYI: Consumer Reports, October 2008 (pg 33) rates the Canon Powershot SD 1100IS in the top three best subcompact cameras! Will keep updating! Happy shopping! diff --git a/SINAI-SA-corpus/5/ref1072_rate5.txt b/SINAI-SA-corpus/5/ref1072_rate5.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..f98dba144200aba9618e9d6dbd8550b93a1e56c2 --- /dev/null +++ b/SINAI-SA-corpus/5/ref1072_rate5.txt @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ + BEST COMPACT CAMERA!!!, June 10, 2008 + ByAndrea Willis (Scottsdale, Arizona) - See all my reviews +Before buying this camera, I researched all of the Canon Powershot (ultra compact) cameras on Canon's website, as well as, reading blogs and reviews elsewhere online. This camera is fantastic for someone who wants to take a great picture ALL of the time with the image stabilization (IS) feature. I would NOT buy any camera without the IS feature. I bought this camera because IT HAS MOVIE WITH SOUND (SOUND IS KEY) as many other models do not have sound. I also wanted a view window (viewfinder) in case the sun was too bright in Arizona to see the images on the nice 2.5" LCD screen. I haven't had to use the view finder yet. :-) Now this camera isn't for zooming and taking far off shots in nature as the zoom isn't nearly strong enough for that. Things look smaller on the screen (mountains) than to the naked eye. But if you want a great camera for taking pictures of people, pets and with the macro setting (up close such as jewelry to list on ebay) this camera will be your new best friend. It is easy to work and the instructions are actually easy to understand. I am so thrilled with it. THE PICTURES ARE FANTASTIC!!!!!!!! And, with amazon, you have no sales tax ... so you will be hard pressed to find a better deal. And, you can choose the various colors vs. just having another silver camera like everyone else. I chose the Brown and love it. God Bless! diff --git a/SINAI-SA-corpus/5/ref1073_rate5.txt b/SINAI-SA-corpus/5/ref1073_rate5.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..b7ec73d2dae3075788ac7d11b3a89ee8fa763d77 --- /dev/null +++ b/SINAI-SA-corpus/5/ref1073_rate5.txt @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ + Pocket camera for travel, June 10, 2008 + ByG. LYON "w8t4me-in-lobby" (Wash., DC USA) - See all my reviews +The SD1100IS is, for me, a backup travel camera. I have another much larger digital camera that serves for taking studio shots (art work) and telephoto details in scenery. That said, I find the SD1100IS just excellent. Get a decent neck strap so you can slip the 1100 into your T-shirt pocket (guys here) and you are all set. The little camera is very adaptable--recent night shots of Philadelphia came out nicely. The macro setting works well too--flower details can be recorded with ease. diff --git a/SINAI-SA-corpus/5/ref1075_rate5.txt b/SINAI-SA-corpus/5/ref1075_rate5.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..5ba3b24f3446e532e9cc27fc1219d671ff94ee4c --- /dev/null +++ b/SINAI-SA-corpus/5/ref1075_rate5.txt @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ + This this is beautiful!!, May 13, 2008 + ByJoseph Tester "me" (Virginia) - See all my reviews +I wanted a small point and shoot camera for in my pocket when I am not carrying my Nikon SLR, which is huge and bulky. I miss too many shots that way. I bought this one a couple of weeks ago and I am amazed. The shots are clear, and good enough to be sold on stock photography sites that are very picky. I even shot video with it to send to my husband in Iraq and it is as good as a small hand held video camera, and picture cameras never have that quality. Buy this one!! It is soooo worth the money :) diff --git a/SINAI-SA-corpus/5/ref1076_rate5.txt b/SINAI-SA-corpus/5/ref1076_rate5.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..38e8b9db70e956e620776078186da688b9a3be79 --- /dev/null +++ b/SINAI-SA-corpus/5/ref1076_rate5.txt @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ + great camera, May 10, 2008 + BySooner "sooner" (Yukon, Ok) - See all my reviews +This camera is awesome. I am not an expert with electronics and found this camera to be extremely easy to use. It takes excellent pictures and the the battery life is good. The load time follow a picture is quick also allowing you to take consecutive pictures quickly. diff --git a/SINAI-SA-corpus/5/ref1077_rate5.txt b/SINAI-SA-corpus/5/ref1077_rate5.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..e39541bb611b23670f420796261580761ee6bf43 --- /dev/null +++ b/SINAI-SA-corpus/5/ref1077_rate5.txt @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ + Great Camera!, May 10, 2008 + ByJonel L. Rossbach "Stickyrunner325" (Emporia, KS) - See all my reviews +I bought this camera after having dealt with many other digital cameras and this one is the best one yet! The picture quality is beautiful and I don't have to wait a lifetime for the flash to work as I did with other cameras. It fits great in your pocket and is lightweight. It has the face focus squares and the zoom works wonderful. I would recommend this camera to anyone. diff --git a/SINAI-SA-corpus/5/ref1078_rate5.txt b/SINAI-SA-corpus/5/ref1078_rate5.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..65c56e193c87f54277c968ed1e8fd0d0d1e8aa68 --- /dev/null +++ b/SINAI-SA-corpus/5/ref1078_rate5.txt @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ + Sharp and Simple, April 28, 2008 + ByM. Minutella (Clifton, NJ USA) - See all my reviews +I always look to CANON, when it comes to an imaging device. I own several Canon cameras, (still and video), (2) printers and (2) scanners. The CANON SD1100IS does everything it claims with the same quality as the more expensive cameras do. With the arrival of my 2 grandchildren, I wanted a camera that captured Clean, Sharply focused pictures quickly, since babies won't pose for you. So far, since I purchased this at the end of March, I have taken over 300 photos. At present, I have only charged the battery once and it is still ready to shoot. The on-board effects add an incredible touch of professionalism to my pictures. Sunlight, indoors, at night, ambient lighting without a flash, every picture a keeper! If you are looking for versatility, simplicity, and great pictures you will be proud of, consider the SD1100IS. I researched a lot of cameras, and the SD1100IS did all I wanted and more, for a very affordable price. diff --git a/SINAI-SA-corpus/5/ref1080_rate5.txt b/SINAI-SA-corpus/5/ref1080_rate5.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..15163f7ac2a3043ff3119c796cb8140e7e519725 --- /dev/null +++ b/SINAI-SA-corpus/5/ref1080_rate5.txt @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ + Great camera, July 10, 2008 + ByLoke - See all my reviews +After some delay by Amazon who never ship the extra battery which I bought together (Someone must be sleeping on duty!!!) and they took 8 days (instead of 2) for complete delivery with no compensation for delay. Why should I pay the school fees for Amazon's mistake (lesson)? Fortunately, the camera lives up to its expectation and the experiences is great so far. I have used many different cameras (Sony, Kodak SLR, Fujifilm etc) but needed a ultra-compact for daily job. First, I would like to highlight some weaknesses: 1) Mechanical Noise - whenever the button is pressed during photo taking, the motor starts working and there is some noise of adjustment inside. It is clearly audible if you are using the viewfinder. I wonder if it will shorten the lifespan of the camera? 2) Tower of light - when you try to take a shot at night with low visibility, you will notice vertical "tower of light" from bright road beam. Clearly, the ISO or IS cannot coordinate well. 3) The shutter lag - if you are taking shots between short intervals with flash, the waiting time may be significant if you are in a rush. 4) Weak flash - I simply cannot get a clear photo at night for a subject standing 10m away. 4m is reasonably ok. On the other hand, apply contrary thinking for battery life conversation 5) ISO 1600 - it is pushing to the limit and the noise level is too great to seriously put the photo into archive. ISO 800 is bad enough while 400 is ok. 6) Sensitive Mic - at night, the mic works perfectly but if there is 0.5m tailwind behind, you will hear hurricane during playback. Of course, I am asking for the moon. 7) 32MB - this is the joke for the day but without a memory card, you cannot even store 1 single shot. 8) Short battery life - common problem faced by other DSCs. 9) Face recognition - the menu describes chasing the faces by pressing the "print" button while depressing the button halfway. Hey, our fingers are flexible but they are not yoga trained (yet). On the features, I am impressed (besides the obvious DIS, slim and 8MB stories) with: 1) Stitch assist - this is wonderful but i have yet to try out piecing them back via software provided 2) Color switch - wonderful to highlight specific subject 3) Viewfinder - Yes, many are omitting this feature to cut cost. But this is the only way to make your battery lasts 2 times longer (in the event you forgot to take extra battery). 4) Video - Try it. This is one great reason to buy such ultra compact camera for carrying around. The video playback is excellent. 5) Reasonably priced - I bought at $213 but now it is $208. Are you waiting for $199? 6) Great for ladies.... On accessories, I strongly recommend the following: 1) Leather casing to protect knocking and scratches; 2) 4GB of memory (format using camera); 3) protective cover for the LCD; and 4) Photo bank with 80GB for video taking. diff --git a/SINAI-SA-corpus/5/ref1082_rate5.txt b/SINAI-SA-corpus/5/ref1082_rate5.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..1a502f0e7f396ebdce3bbf483113dd84f6f22086 --- /dev/null +++ b/SINAI-SA-corpus/5/ref1082_rate5.txt @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ + Excellent pocket camera to capture impromptu moments., December 30, 2008 + ByC. Norey (Michigan, USA) - See all my reviews +Many of us past our "salad years" can't hang onto those ultra-thin pocket cameras. This one is small enough for pockets & not so skinny that I drop & fumble it, thereby chasing away the deer or distracting the kids and ruining the unguarded moment I wanted to capture. Great picture quality, and a digital zoom that seems to actually work! Very happy being spontaneous and impromptu with it. diff --git a/SINAI-SA-corpus/5/ref1085_rate5.txt b/SINAI-SA-corpus/5/ref1085_rate5.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..2be623651aef3207aa126ee44f75e8241c7d557f --- /dev/null +++ b/SINAI-SA-corpus/5/ref1085_rate5.txt @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ + Awesome Camera!!, October 21, 2008 + ByKimberly A. Walter (Palm Harbor, FL) - See all my reviews +We took this camera on vacation, and the shots we got looked professional. Very user-friendly. The "kids and pets" setting lets you take great pictures even when there is a lot of activity- no blurs. My sister-in-law is a semi-professional photographer, and she is now going to buy one after seeing how fantastic our photos came out. I highly recommend this camera!! diff --git a/SINAI-SA-corpus/5/ref1087_rate5.txt b/SINAI-SA-corpus/5/ref1087_rate5.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..7f473a82602f9d79d0701aaf2be0933e8dbb240e --- /dev/null +++ b/SINAI-SA-corpus/5/ref1087_rate5.txt @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ + Excellent for a point-and-shoot, and now an excellent value, September 13, 2008 + ByE. Carbone (Atlanta, GA United States) - See all my reviews +Now that Canon and its rivals are offering numerous compact and ultracompact point-and-shoot cameras in the 10-12 megapixel range, the price on this 8 megapixel unit has dropped dramatically. But don't be fooled by the notion that more megapixels is better -- in this class of camera, it's not necessarily true. Unless the sensor is larger, which it generally isn't, you will often not see any difference in the 10 and 12 MP cameras. In fact, you might get more noise. You are also likely to get a longer delay between shots. So if you are buying a high end digital SLR, sure, go for 12, 14, or now even 16 megapixels. But for a point-and-shoot compact, 7 or 8 MP is more than adequate. This model offers 8 MP, face detection, and a variety of shooting modes that can be easily selected from a menu. It provides excellent results for everyday photography. It is also extremely compact and easily fits in a pocket or purse. If you want a camera to take along wherever you go, this is a must-have. It's also an incredible value, now available for as little as $160-$180. If you buy this camera, note that it only includes a 32 MB memory card, which holds roughly 10-12 photos. You will certainly want to purchase a good, fast card. The SanDisk Extreme 4 GB works great and will hold over 1000 photos at the highest resolution (1800-2500 at lower image settings). You can now get one for $30-$45. Also, you may want to get an extra battery. Lenmar makes a good Canon equivalent that you can get for about $10. (Beware of no-name knockoffs that cost $2 or $3!) Overall, excellent ultracompact point-and-shoot camera. Get this item to have with you all the time. (And save up $1000-$3000+ for a high-end digital SLR if you have serious, semi-pro photography needs). diff --git a/SINAI-SA-corpus/5/ref1088_rate5.txt b/SINAI-SA-corpus/5/ref1088_rate5.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..c28249a2b5ab260d1482d45da95aa8aedf39b4b7 --- /dev/null +++ b/SINAI-SA-corpus/5/ref1088_rate5.txt @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ + Canon 1100IS is Tops in a compact pocket digital camera, August 9, 2008 + ByRobert McClard "scienceguy2001" (Yuba City , Ca USA) - See all my reviews +I just returned from Europe and took over 1500 images and videos with the wonderful camera. I have a neck strap and keep the camera handy my my chest pocket. This works so smoothly. When wishing to grab a quick shot I just pull it our and is seconds it is on and ready to take a picture, video, or record audio. The face detection works well and if the shutter is pressed half way down the face will be highlighted and sometimes enlarged to show you where the focal point is. The exposure will be on the face most of the time so if the back ground is bright you will have a properly exposed face. This works especially will if the person(s) are close to the camera. I have taken some beautifully exposed faces all over Europe under some difficult lighting conditions... back light or total darkness. The image stabilization really helps in dim lighting like in museums where you might like to take photos of art hanging on the walls. No flash is permitted so the IS really helps. In large churches that are often dimly lit one can rest the camera further on a bench or stable surface for further help with long exposures. I took and extra battery and swapped it out every 4 days or so to keep the battery always ready for a shot. This worked all but one time when I took about 200 shots and a few videos and ran out of battery. The Amazon price is one of the lowest I've seen. In Europe they are about 225 to 250 Euro or about 300 to 400 American dollars, so we get a very good deal here. The 2 Gig memory cards work fine and store a ton of information. I recorded picture tags with the camera to place audio clips with the photos at concerts, family reunions, travel directions and friends voices telling stores. I just aimed the mike on the front of the camera in the direction I wished to record. It was fun to playback the audio at a later time and relive the moment. diff --git a/SINAI-SA-corpus/5/ref108_rate5.txt b/SINAI-SA-corpus/5/ref108_rate5.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..4085a73bbe3eee6b35013751c12eed3a92e9c2b4 --- /dev/null +++ b/SINAI-SA-corpus/5/ref108_rate5.txt @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ + A nice point and shoot, December 24, 2008 + ByJerry Newman - See all my reviews +Pros: Compact:fits in pocket; Uses standard AA batteries; viewfinder; Image Stabilized; Good sharpness; Ability to control exposure; comfortable in hand; price Cons: Slow flash recycle; battery life may be so-so As an advanced amateur I wanted a point and shoot camera that I could keep with me that was compact yet allowed me to control the exposure if I wanted to. My DSLR is just to bulky to carry with me and too expensive to just leave laying around. This camera meets my needs perfectly as it is compact and is one of the few Canon point and shoots that allows you to control exposure by aperture, shutter speed or manually. This is handy when in difficult light situations, portraiture, and especially in landscape shooting. Although the ability to use a histogram (a graph that tells you about the details of exposure) may not be used by many folks in everyday photography, it is available on this camera. The viewfinder allows you to hold the camera up to your face instead of having use the LCD screen by holding the camera away from you. This allows you to hold the camera steadier and makes it easier to use the zoom controls. I find it unbelievable that so few point and shoots have this what I consider to be necessary feature. The view finder adjusts as you zoom the lens so you can see what you are shooting. When you have too many megapixels in a small camera, you really don't gain anything useful, but you do loose picture quality, especially color quality. This camera is just about right in that you should be able to make about a 16x20 inch print (or do some cropping)while still have good sharpness and quality. The picture, compared to the 10 or more megapixel cameras, has bright colors and good sharpness. The shape has a nice feel to it and it fits in my hand nicely. The controls are easy to get to and the menus are fairly intuitive. Since I carry it in my brief case, I first used it at an office party and the pictures came out great. The 8X10 group portrait was sharp with good colors and contrast. Canon makes a great camera and this one is no exception. What I don't understand is why it is so inexpensive compared with others in its class, yet has so many features. I strongly recommend it for the person looking for a good point and shoot. Enjoy it and take some good pictures. diff --git a/SINAI-SA-corpus/5/ref1096_rate5.txt b/SINAI-SA-corpus/5/ref1096_rate5.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..e24b7d887e87634cf436fd3639c4d46576da705c --- /dev/null +++ b/SINAI-SA-corpus/5/ref1096_rate5.txt @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ + perfect for me, June 27, 2008 + ByB. Sinclair "seahouse" (roads end) - See all my reviews +I need a camera for everything, business and pleasure. And, this is an ideal camera. I had the predecessor and will continue purhasing cannon powershot cameras. Clear photos, great size cameara fits in the pocket or purse. Can't go wrong with this one. Purchase a memory card that holds dozens of pix, though. diff --git a/SINAI-SA-corpus/5/ref1097_rate5.txt b/SINAI-SA-corpus/5/ref1097_rate5.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..2dccbf3f001ed6ca3449b74fa11e0486b7b24166 --- /dev/null +++ b/SINAI-SA-corpus/5/ref1097_rate5.txt @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ + Great Little Camera, June 9, 2008 + ByK. S. Bowen "KS Bowen" (California) - See all my reviews +I've owned digital SLRs for many years and I needed a P&S camera to take along for snapshot photos. This camera turned out to be the perfect choice for me. It is so small it can easily be carried anywhere. The photos are not as good as those from my SLRs, of course, but they are excellent, nonetheless. The point is, I can take this camera anywhere for any occasion and get the shot, whereas I can't and won't do that with the pro equipment. There are several features I especially like, including manual controls, widescreen mode, time-lapse movie mode, macro mode and a remarkably useable digital zoom. The camera has enough manual controls to satisfy my need for tweaking, especially since I usually prefer the lowest ISO possible with flash forced 'off.' When I shoot in widescreen mode, I can view the photos on my 16x9 widescreen TV and they look great. As a matter of fact, I'm shooting in 16x9 widescreen format pretty much all the time now because of this capability. Digital zoom has changed--no longer do you get blocky images from the camera's blowing up a portion of the sensor's image. Due to the sensor's high megapixel count, the blown up portion no longer looks pixelated as in previous models. It's like having a telephoto lens inside the camera to get those shots at the rare times when it's needed. Macro mode performs so well that flower photos rival those from my SLRs. The camera also has an excellent movie mode, including a fun time-lapse feature. Previous Canon sensors on P&S cameras were 'use at your own risk' when shooting above ISO 100. This camera's sensor has improved considerably by providing what I would call 'very good' photos at ISO 200, 'good' photos at ISO 400 and 'acceptable' shots at ISO 800. I use noise-reduction software to clean up photos, anyway, but I'm pleased that Canon has improved their sensor and in-camera software. Couple all of these features with IS, which virtually eliminates shaking and blurry pictures, and Canon has another winner on its hands. I predict sales of this little gem will be off the charts. diff --git a/SINAI-SA-corpus/5/ref1098_rate5.txt b/SINAI-SA-corpus/5/ref1098_rate5.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..8731897078af36b1a60c85edcc7d331dd0dc35a3 --- /dev/null +++ b/SINAI-SA-corpus/5/ref1098_rate5.txt @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ + Amazing Camera, May 14, 2008 + ByBountyUpper (Tucson, AZ) - See all my reviews +Took this camera to Europe with me. The battery life is super long and it captures photos perfectly! I love it. I've used it for about a month and have had absolutely no problems. diff --git a/SINAI-SA-corpus/5/ref1099_rate5.txt b/SINAI-SA-corpus/5/ref1099_rate5.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..e1a0ca45d418c851a8e29c29bed1650f2d72b386 --- /dev/null +++ b/SINAI-SA-corpus/5/ref1099_rate5.txt @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ + A quality Shirt Pocket Camera point and shoot camera, May 4, 2008 + ByJohn R. Clark - See all my reviews +I am starting to believe this is the best camera I have ever had. It is very small, but I am beginning to learn how to hangle it. Best lens I have had -- close up -- long distance. It says 3x zoom but it seems to outperform my 10x other camera. Image stabilization works. diff --git a/SINAI-SA-corpus/5/ref109_rate5.txt b/SINAI-SA-corpus/5/ref109_rate5.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..e0e77506d83512218288062b617232516d843309 --- /dev/null +++ b/SINAI-SA-corpus/5/ref109_rate5.txt @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ + Excelente, December 22, 2008 + ByEmilio Villalobos Madrigal (Costa Rica) - See all my reviews +Es un excelente producto y además el vendedor brindó un muy buen servicio que sin duda alguna es digno de merecer una buena calificación. diff --git a/SINAI-SA-corpus/5/ref10_rate5.txt b/SINAI-SA-corpus/5/ref10_rate5.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..ba1d436dff45d672378fc716c23c2d88793ca98d --- /dev/null +++ b/SINAI-SA-corpus/5/ref10_rate5.txt @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ + Canon AS590IS A great camera, June 22, 2008 + ByKeith Miller "Tib" (Boise, Idaho USA) - See all my reviews +The AS590IS is a great camera for me. I have had a number of 35 mm cameras and one digital camera. This camera is easy to use especially for those that are not really high tech. There are functions that a person can do manually if they understand the camera and how to use the functions. There are a number of settings that are easy to select and use. I would recommend this camera it is a good value. diff --git a/SINAI-SA-corpus/5/ref1100_rate5.txt b/SINAI-SA-corpus/5/ref1100_rate5.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..f658ca0586e868f62bd99f9082b29912e51f580b --- /dev/null +++ b/SINAI-SA-corpus/5/ref1100_rate5.txt @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ + Love it!, May 3, 2008 + ByS. MALONE - See all my reviews +This is my second Canon, but my first Elph. I am very impressed with its functionality relative to my larger Canon Rebel XLT. I carry it everywhere and love using it. The battery died more quickly than I expected, but now I know to charge it more often. diff --git a/SINAI-SA-corpus/5/ref1101_rate5.txt b/SINAI-SA-corpus/5/ref1101_rate5.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..dd47fb435e9678b9036089baf83154b230353a68 --- /dev/null +++ b/SINAI-SA-corpus/5/ref1101_rate5.txt @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ + Overall a great camera, April 24, 2008 + ByEric W. Surma - See all my reviews +I bought the Cannon SD1100 IS about a month ago and I am happy with my purchase so far. I am not even going to pretend to be a camera aficionado but I am a casual photographer that enjoys simple, easy to use cameras that take great pictures. The SD1100 is everything that I was looking for in a compact digital camera. Compared to my previous digital camera (a Kodak CX7530), the Cannon is far superior. The images are crystal clear and the included software is much more intuitive and easy to use compared to Kodak's Easy Share software. The included IS feature is nice if you have shaky hands when trying to take pictures. I also invested in a second battery which has come in handy on vacation when it's not always easy to find time to charge a single battery. I only have a few minor complaints about the camera so far. First, the 32MB memory card included is a joke. No store even sells memory cards this small any more so investing in at least a 1GB card is a must. Secondly, the camera does have rather flimsy plastic doors for the battery/memory card and the AV outputs. The cover for the AV outputs is also a little awkward as it doesn't open fully. The only other thing I noticed about the camera was the LCD screen sometimes displays a solid vertical line or two when taking pictures at night. I noticed this when I was at a night baseball game so I don't know if there is a different setting that I should have used to negate some of the brightness of the stadium lights. diff --git a/SINAI-SA-corpus/5/ref1102_rate5.txt b/SINAI-SA-corpus/5/ref1102_rate5.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..08c2678a7b205c1314bed6b7714d3209d498c43c --- /dev/null +++ b/SINAI-SA-corpus/5/ref1102_rate5.txt @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ + Excellent camera, April 18, 2008 + ByKim Sutton (Concord, CA) - See all my reviews +This camera is wonderful, it has vibrant color and lots of great features. I just love it and would advise everyone to get one. diff --git a/SINAI-SA-corpus/5/ref1103_rate5.txt b/SINAI-SA-corpus/5/ref1103_rate5.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..aee4b6ad453f47de5f68eeedd8cb3b68762e3ee0 --- /dev/null +++ b/SINAI-SA-corpus/5/ref1103_rate5.txt @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ + Great Product, April 12, 2008 + ByDelka Katzareva "D." (San Diego, CA) - See all my reviews +Great camera, highly recommend it, small design and easy to use. Amazon shipping/handling outstanding as usual. diff --git a/SINAI-SA-corpus/5/ref1104_rate5.txt b/SINAI-SA-corpus/5/ref1104_rate5.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..7495d64095d9f89e40d9aab0445648fa3d332c41 --- /dev/null +++ b/SINAI-SA-corpus/5/ref1104_rate5.txt @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ + Excellent compact camera, April 10, 2008 + ByA. Lepki "andylepki" (Canada) - See all my reviews +This camera is a great companion to my Rebel XT, but I am getting to the point where I may abandon the SLR for certain trips, due to the crisp image quality and greater portability of this model. The PowerShot IS excels in good light, with its ISO 80 setting providing great colours. At the opposite end, ISO 1600 is a useful setting to have, however the images become quite grainy, and if your subject is moving, you are unlikely to get a crisp snapshot in low light. The large LCD screen makes composition easy, and the quick power up and power down makes for opportunistic shooting. I am also a big fan of the timelapse feature, whereby you can take videos at 1 or 2s intervals and the output is stored as an AVI file at 15fps. One adjustment I will have to make is with regards the battery life, and after using a digital SLR which can go days without a charge, I've found I need to keep a spare battery on me to keep the energy hungry LCD screen in business. A few of the features are a bit gimmicky, such as the colour swapper, but for the price, the 8MP images pack as professional a punch as you could want from a sub $250 camera. diff --git a/SINAI-SA-corpus/5/ref1105_rate5.txt b/SINAI-SA-corpus/5/ref1105_rate5.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..432d0d1bbf335ce8e37b2802ce691bb7e2db6b10 --- /dev/null +++ b/SINAI-SA-corpus/5/ref1105_rate5.txt @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ + Improvements over SD1000--, March 13, 2008 + ByGood_Person (NY) - See all my reviews +I took a lot of time to review this camera before buying. I DID NOT buy the camera at this time, so this is a PREVIEW - not a review. Why am I writing? Because I see so many people here describing the SD1100 as an upgrade to the SD1000 - with the only differences an added megapixel and image stabilizer - So I would like to bring to your attention the rest of the differences and improvements, which can help your decision. The SD1100 has many improvements over the SD1000. It has FINALLY a battery meter which is a recent welcome addition in Canon cameras. It has the "LP" mode for video, which doubles the time you could record video, at almost the same quality (640x480). So in the SD1000 on a 2gb card you were limited to 16 minutes, and in the SD1100 you can have 32 minutes. That's also a welcome addition for Canon which only let's you record on uncompressed AVI format - not MPG like so many others. You can still not use the OPTICAL ZOOM when recording video. The zoom range is also different. The SD1000 was a little more "wide-angle", and the SD1100 zooms in a bit more. The face detection technology is also improved, by applying the strength of the flash according to the face it is recognizing, so it's should not overexpose. For you guys who still doesn't have a clue what the SD1000 was bringing new, let me repeat in short (of course everything is included in the SD1100 as well). Face detection technology; in camera red eye correction; 2:3 guide for 4x6 prints (you know where it's gonna get cut-off); settings and menus are much better designed than previous canons (you could see more selections on screen); and much more. I would also like to mention that pcmag.com has a review on the new SD1100, but they say that the older SD1000 (which was a "editor's choice" since arrival) have better picture quality than the newer SD1100 - So that the new 1100 is not worth upgrading from the SD1000. Hope my information will help someone. diff --git a/SINAI-SA-corpus/5/ref1106_rate5.txt b/SINAI-SA-corpus/5/ref1106_rate5.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..10f9ddde2a6ac363cca28b035da844e2f8209ce1 --- /dev/null +++ b/SINAI-SA-corpus/5/ref1106_rate5.txt @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ + Excellent compact digital camera, April 9, 2008 + ByMr. Ronald Li (Wood Dale, Illinois USA) - See all my reviews +All I want is a compact digital camera that has excellent picture quality and very easy to use so I can take it to anywhere without much of effort and knowing I can take quality pictures. This is the one. Actually, this camera is much better than I expected. diff --git a/SINAI-SA-corpus/5/ref1107_rate5.txt b/SINAI-SA-corpus/5/ref1107_rate5.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..ec8ac8619a58fa0135bbb167523c846239a3ea31 --- /dev/null +++ b/SINAI-SA-corpus/5/ref1107_rate5.txt @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ + Fantastic camera at a great price, March 12, 2008 + ByK. C. mccabe (Wilmington, DE) - See all my reviews +I just bought this camera last night and I had a few hours to play with it. The picture quality is fantastic indoors and outside. The macro setting is really nice. I was looking for a small camera under $300 that has great picture quality and movie quality. I found it! The SD100IS is the best choice, and it looks very cool. I bought mine in brown. diff --git a/SINAI-SA-corpus/5/ref1108_rate5.txt b/SINAI-SA-corpus/5/ref1108_rate5.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..5f64ecfb555b701810e7a7675b2a899adf521f87 --- /dev/null +++ b/SINAI-SA-corpus/5/ref1108_rate5.txt @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ + the best for less, February 1, 2009 + ByG. T. Cuppels (Delaware) - See all my reviews +Without a doubt the best overall camera in its class. I have bought the powershot class cameras since they came on the market. I have upgraded as features are added or MPs significantly increase. To date between my wife and childern we have bought at least 5-6 powershots and never been sorry that we did.The ease of use and quality of construction coupled with a sofisicated menu of options makes purchase of this camera a very wise investment. At less than $150.00 it is truly a best buy. diff --git a/SINAI-SA-corpus/5/ref1109_rate5.txt b/SINAI-SA-corpus/5/ref1109_rate5.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..e6245d9c446175ed1f9ac221a9c6350020ffddee --- /dev/null +++ b/SINAI-SA-corpus/5/ref1109_rate5.txt @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ + Amazing ultra-compact point&shoot for the price, January 26, 2009 + ByMinh A. Do (Fairfax, VA United States) - See all my reviews +It's been years since I purchased an ultracompact digital camera for myself. I got a few cameras for friends and family as gifts but I decided that it was about time to get a new one and retire my old Sony Cybershot. After days of research I found that I liked the image quality of Canon, so it was just a matter of choosing the camera with the features I wanted. Ultimately the research led me to the PowerShot SD1100IS. An after-Thanksgiving sale at BestBuy got me the camera, an extra battery, a case, and a 2GB SD card for only $150. So after having used this camera for a couple months now, here is what I can say about it. First, the good: - Stylish, small and light. It really is an eye catcher, especially in the colors offered. Canon isn't known to make the slimmest or gimmicky cameras, but I still had people complimenting it. It's small enough to fit in my pocket without being uncomfortable or bulgy. - Image quality rivals some dSLR shots. The lighting conditions don't even have to be ideal and I have still managed some amazing shots. I'm sure the optical image stabilization has a lot to do with it, but the colors captured just seem more like what my eyes really see. I'm not anywhere near professional, and yet this camera manages to make it easy to take good photos. I've found that I rarely if ever need to go to Photoshop to make color and contrast corrections anymore. - Along the same lines as above, the built-in red-eye correction functionality works amazingly well. This probably isn't a new feature on most cameras, but I haven't had a new digital camera in years. I found that the red-eye correction worked far better than Photoshop's eye color tool. - Facial recognition is scary accurate... when conditions are right. More on that later. I even tried pointing it at a magazine rack in the bookstore and it put boxes around the faces on the covers. - Fast shutter speeds and startup times. It's ready to go almost as soon as you turn it on. I've managed to turn on the camera and snag a couple shots of a speedy chipmunk in my backyard before the critter can scurry away. - Has an optical viewfinder. Never again will I strain while staring at the screen in the outdoor sunlight. Here are the negatives that come to mind: - Either there are no manual exposure controls, or they're hidden in such a way that I can't easily find them. - Small-ish screen. It's the same size screen as my older Cybershot, and I can see that Canon has released ultra-compacts with bigger screens. Not too big of a deal for me given that the optical viewfinder takes up some of that valuable real-estate on such a small camera. - It's really more of a nitpick, but the facial recognition works well only if your subjects are mostly facing forward eyes visible and their heads aren't tilted too much. People with sunglasses, or hair obscuring their eye won't be picked up from what I've found. Doesn't work at all with a sideways head. I've taken so many more photos with this in the past 2 months and I almost never have to do any post-processing to make my shots look better now. It's small enough to go with me almost everywhere. It's great for when you're going out and hanging with friends, to major events, family gatherings, and parties. I put the most mileage on it during Thanksgiving, Christmas, New Years Eve, as well as a wedding recently and the photos turn out great. It also takes decent enough videos, at least for uploading to Facebook. If you're on the fence about this camera, I highly recommend you go for it. diff --git a/SINAI-SA-corpus/5/ref1110_rate5.txt b/SINAI-SA-corpus/5/ref1110_rate5.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..f9ff7ba1644f45250bd26abc0bd87c3055da79d1 --- /dev/null +++ b/SINAI-SA-corpus/5/ref1110_rate5.txt @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ + Great little pocket cam, January 21, 2009 + ByKate S. (Bellingham, WA) - See all my reviews +I love this little camera. Takes great shots (it's a Cannon after all), is very compact, great battery life, and even sports a viewfinder. I bought this as a back-up to my DSLR (also a Cannon) and have no regrets. Believe me, I did a lot of research and even bought another camera which I had to return due to poor photo quality (the Panasonic FX01). If you just need a nice little pocket camera, go for the SD1100. diff --git a/SINAI-SA-corpus/5/ref1111_rate5.txt b/SINAI-SA-corpus/5/ref1111_rate5.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..d9552cea949739e585baa5c81535c6c587aa87cc --- /dev/null +++ b/SINAI-SA-corpus/5/ref1111_rate5.txt @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ + Great Purchase, January 13, 2009 + Byrikat (Bay Area, California) - See all my reviews +I am a high school student who is interested in photography (amateur status) and takes pictures for yearbook. I wanted a solid, attractive camera that could take fast shots, adjust to lighting quickly, and had a good auto setting, freeing me up to compose my pictures fast and effectively, rather than wasting time making sure the camera focused and that the flash worked correctly. This camera filled all those requirements, and it is the best purchase I've made in a while. I research a lot before I buy an item, and I bought this trusting that it would meet my high standards. It did! And the blue aluminum casing is both pretty and durable. I would recommend it to anyone looking for a small, light camera that takes fast and great resolution pictures. For an incredibly low price, too! diff --git a/SINAI-SA-corpus/5/ref1112_rate5.txt b/SINAI-SA-corpus/5/ref1112_rate5.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..16f4113a6b40099010985f91152781eabbd96c3a --- /dev/null +++ b/SINAI-SA-corpus/5/ref1112_rate5.txt @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ + Great Little Camera, January 12, 2009 + ByPeggy Smith (OKC, OK) - See all my reviews +I bought this to take with me to Europe. I wanted something I could put in my purse or pocket. It took great pictures, was easy to use, the battery lasted longer than any of the other camera batteries (I was with 4 other people). I took an extra battery, so I always had one charged. I dropped this camera numerous times and it just kept on clicking. Each night we would upload the pics off of all 4 cameras onto a computer and my pics were by far the best quality. diff --git a/SINAI-SA-corpus/5/ref1113_rate5.txt b/SINAI-SA-corpus/5/ref1113_rate5.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..975dd4f6546a38bd70ff5626aec31091e22d7950 --- /dev/null +++ b/SINAI-SA-corpus/5/ref1113_rate5.txt @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ + Sure Beats the Panasonic I Dropped Down a Cliff, January 9, 2009 + ByDavid Kelley "tornveil" (Seattle, WA USA) - See all my reviews +I had a Panasonic 6MP 6X zoom with no viewfinder. No viewfinder was a pain outdoors. The LCD went through batteries. I think that the 6MP exceeded the resolution of the lens optics. The lens had some dirt in it which showed up in bright pictures when the iris stopped down some. I was not so sorrowful that the wrist strap was not really around my wrist when I reached out to shoot down the cliff. I recovered what was important: 2GB SD card, so I lost no photos except those I was unable to take later for the lack of a camera. This Canon is only 3X optical zoom, though I think digital zoom (12X total) provides better quality than using Photoshop to do an equivalent digital zoom of a 3X optical shot. The Canon integrates the optical and digital zooms nicely. The Canon is engineered by a camera company. I trust Canon more for that than Panasonic, especially optics. The Canon is really small. I carry it in my pocket all the time. It takes far more pictures on a single charge than the Panasonic ever did on a fresh set of alkyline AAs. The Canon has fewer special modes; e.g., "baby" mode, which is miss a bit. (I'm a relatively new grandfather.) It has a few modes the Panaconic didn't have. These modes are a bit gimicky, but there are times they might be useful. Offline, the Canon has a red-eye reduction function. Being on a camera, it is a bit awkward to use, but it does a very nice job. I prefer the job it does to Photoshop Elements. The camera knows which way is up. This is nice until I purposefully take a picture upside down. I try turning the camera over to view it, but the camera flips it so it is still upside down. However, when I pull the pictures into my PC I can do anything I want with which way is up. The ZoomEX Browser software for pulling pictures from the camera is easy to use. With the Panasonic, I always used WIndows Explorer. With this I prefer Canon's software. One glitch: a process is left running that keeps me from releasing the SD card from my PC. I use Task Manager to murder the process tree, then I can "Safely Remove Hardware". I am probably not exiting the ZoomEX Browser correctly or something. I haven't check the web for solutions to this problem yet. Picture quality is excellent. Exposure is good. Disabling the flash in automatic mode is easy. Price was very good. Turn on/off speed is good. Movie mode is excellent. Sure beats the old VHS camcorder I had years ago. Twice the linear resolution makes for crisp, clear pictures on a standard TV. I am disapointed that zoom is disabled while recording. It doesn't use standard batteries, but a single charge goes a long ways. I bought a second battery (pricey, but cheaper than buying batteries in the long run) so I won't get caught without backup. Macro mode works very well. diff --git a/SINAI-SA-corpus/5/ref1114_rate5.txt b/SINAI-SA-corpus/5/ref1114_rate5.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..749a305b27dfdd559c84551bc6975afb5415de43 --- /dev/null +++ b/SINAI-SA-corpus/5/ref1114_rate5.txt @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ + Phenominal for the Price, December 22, 2008 + ByTech Time "Rich" (St. Louis, MO) - See all my reviews +I was looking in Consumer Reports and this camera got the best rating for sub-compacts. Then when I found it discounted to $159.00 on Amazon I jumped at it. It has been great, but you'll need to take the time to read the instructions. I mean this camera does everything, so to really take advantage of all it's capabilities you should spend the time to read the manual. diff --git a/SINAI-SA-corpus/5/ref1115_rate5.txt b/SINAI-SA-corpus/5/ref1115_rate5.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..b8b3f4fe0f955352f7f56d6ca4ce02832393e417 --- /dev/null +++ b/SINAI-SA-corpus/5/ref1115_rate5.txt @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ + excellent camera, December 22, 2008 + ByB.Farr "Red Bear" (Texas) - See all my reviews +This is the first time I have used a Canon and have always used Kodak digital. I am amazed at what this little camera can do and am thrilled it is so easy to use. The instruction book is detailed enough to help with all its many features. I don't see myself buying anything but another Canon in the future. diff --git a/SINAI-SA-corpus/5/ref1116_rate5.txt b/SINAI-SA-corpus/5/ref1116_rate5.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..ade9ebfbb4cf3cc8c00bbadaff5f85234fcb4213 --- /dev/null +++ b/SINAI-SA-corpus/5/ref1116_rate5.txt @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ + Excellent product!, December 22, 2008 + ByBrenda J. Harrison "BJ Harrison" (Kingsport, TN) - See all my reviews +The Canon PowerShot SD1100IS is the best point and shoot digital camera I have ever owned! It is also the smallest compact camera I have ever had and I have really enjoyed this product. I bought my daughter one in blue after her camera got broken and I saw what pics it was capable of taking and decided to sell the digital camera I had and replace it with a pink one of the SD1100. I love this camera and for anyone that takes alot of pics it is the ideal camera. diff --git a/SINAI-SA-corpus/5/ref1118_rate5.txt b/SINAI-SA-corpus/5/ref1118_rate5.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..16dfd04e70635e00f9f70ef3678ef7ccf202bebf --- /dev/null +++ b/SINAI-SA-corpus/5/ref1118_rate5.txt @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ + This deserves 4 1/2 stars, not quite 5, December 8, 2008 + By***** "dubolex" (Fairfax, Virginia United States) - See all my reviews +I think Amazon needs to change to a 10 point rating system. I think giving this item 4 stars is not doing it justice but I can't give it 5 unless I thought it was perfect. I bought this after sampling numerous cameras in this size class. It's small enough to fit into a shirt pocket comfortably. I chose the gold color and it looks sweet. The controls and settings are not the most intuitive but not impossible either. The 2 1/2" screen is ok considering how small the rest of the camera is. I guess I would be real picky asking for 3 inches. The preview image that you get on the LCD is grainy but don't be discouraged. It's not the final result when the picture is taken. I must note that this camera also has a viewfinder in case you don't want to use the LCD screen. One of my main criteria was ISO settings and shooting pictures in low light. Indoors, this camera does an amazing job. All you have to do is set it to AUTO and it will give your exposures plenty of light around the subject. It's also smart enough to know when you are outside. Although, if you are not satisfied with the AUTO flash outside, then you can adjust the ISO manually. There is some noise with that but who cares? As long as you shoot amazing pictures and this camera delivers. Another requirement when choosing a digi was the video quality. I've made a few videos and I'm impressed. This is actually better than some digital camcorders or at least on the same level. And to get that level in such a small package is remarkable. You can have fun with features like color accent or color swap. There is even time lapse video on here! Another neat photography feature is panorama. I have to say that instead of in-camera photo stitching, you have to wait until you load the images on your pc and use the included software. That's a bummer but it's something I can overlook considering what else this cam brings. That's one of my very few negatives along with the fact that you can't re-charge the battery without removing it from the camera. For the price, you get a lot of bang for your buck. Strongly recommend for the casual user who wants to take quick pics of people and landscapes. And when I say quick, I mean quick. This camera is ready to take a picture 1 second after you turn it on. diff --git a/SINAI-SA-corpus/5/ref1119_rate5.txt b/SINAI-SA-corpus/5/ref1119_rate5.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..871807511468d78e01067b8463c64a0078707ce7 --- /dev/null +++ b/SINAI-SA-corpus/5/ref1119_rate5.txt @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ + Great camera, December 2, 2008 + ByIslander (Long Island,NY) - See all my reviews +This is a great Camera, it not only takes great pictures, the movies are just as good. The only thing to keep in mind is the Transcend 4G memory card will not work with older readers...So my advice is to buy a Transcend card reader that costs about $15 and plugs into the computer via a USB port diff --git a/SINAI-SA-corpus/5/ref111_rate5.txt b/SINAI-SA-corpus/5/ref111_rate5.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..a98dd5f4f3a69ba23691df487e3baef72924d8c2 --- /dev/null +++ b/SINAI-SA-corpus/5/ref111_rate5.txt @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ + Fabulous! Just what I wanted, July 27, 2008 + Byfriskymisky (Ann Arbor, MI United States) - See all my reviews +Just a short note to let you know that I had some reservations about this item because of the claims of short battery life. I looked at a lot of other cameras and was hoping for some great features without having to go to the fancy schmancy cameras. For the price, I think it's a great buy. It is easy to use, it has a lot of great features and you can use manual functions but I haven't needed to yet because of all of the options including "night scene", "kids and pets", "foliage" and so on. The camera came with two basic alkaline batteries and I've literally taken a couple hundred pictures and they're still working. I don't use the flash very often, so this may contribute to the longer battery life, but I generally use rechargeable Ni-MH batteries, so I'm not too worried about the future battery life once these freebies wear out. diff --git a/SINAI-SA-corpus/5/ref1121_rate5.txt b/SINAI-SA-corpus/5/ref1121_rate5.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..90a2035ba0b1e5629dbcb74e85bea91ae6ae08fa --- /dev/null +++ b/SINAI-SA-corpus/5/ref1121_rate5.txt @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ + This camera is hot, November 23, 2008 + ByDonald E. Silva (Honolulu, Hawaii) - See all my reviews +I was unprepared for the beauty of this camera. My earlier Powershot was 4 years old. The improvements are remarkable. The pictures are clear, the viewfinder is bright and the range of controls are great. I'm not into photography anymore and this unit suits me fine. I chose this one based on reviews I read on Amazon and elsewhere. I don't regret my choice at all. I am very satisfied. diff --git a/SINAI-SA-corpus/5/ref1123_rate5.txt b/SINAI-SA-corpus/5/ref1123_rate5.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..f90d86078f0880dc360bde27ab701b42a040ad53 --- /dev/null +++ b/SINAI-SA-corpus/5/ref1123_rate5.txt @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ + love this camera, November 4, 2008 + BySocial Historian (Little Rock, AR United States) - See all my reviews +This camera is very easy to use and makes beautiful pictures. I've even found and successfully used the beach, night, and portrait settings; I never used these on our old Elph. I highly recommend this camera. diff --git a/SINAI-SA-corpus/5/ref1125_rate5.txt b/SINAI-SA-corpus/5/ref1125_rate5.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..dd35ef489c8f322a07dd21e48582f230234357a3 --- /dev/null +++ b/SINAI-SA-corpus/5/ref1125_rate5.txt @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ + Awesome for the lazy novice, September 6, 2008 + ByJ. Barnabas Lin (Palo Alto, CA) - See all my reviews +Just got this camera for a vacation trip (before the big price cut! bummer.) Spent the last two weeks taking well over 1000 photos on a 4GB card. Have never had my own digital camera before, but have used my friends' cameras and also purchased a Canon A630 for work about a year ago and use that occasionally. Basically, I'm the kind of user who never really wants to "think" about the picture I'm taking and expects the camera to figure out the right settings so I can just press the d--n button and get a great shot. Thus the Auto-mode on a camera is 10 times more important than all the "scene mode" options, because 95% of the time the camera is going to be on auto, and by the time I remember that a scene mode might be more appropriate, it's too late anyway. From that "lazy novice" perspective, this is an awesome camera. It did almost all the thinking for me, and just allowed me to point 'n shoot. People, buildings, boats, skies, ocean, insects, sand, friends -- pretty much everything came out without any adjustment. Comments on pics: I'm slightly red-green color blind, so I can't comment on the color fidelity of the shots, but these are all adjustable on the computer afterwards anyway. Focus was fantastic, with two exceptions: once when I needed to pick one non-centered boat to focus on in an array of boats at various distances, and I hadn't bothered to learn how to pick and lock focus from the manual. And should have used the "infinity focus" lock to take pics/video of a show in a dark theatre where flash was forbidden and the auto-focus assist lamp couldn't find the stage 50 feet away. This was the only time I got a series of blurry shots. I did use the "night snapshot" mode a lot to take pictures at night. That was my one concession in my expectation that the camera figure out everything. A couple times I turned the flash off because the flash was too close to someone's face and kind of flattened his skin tones and natural shadows. I also want to point out that I have very unsteady hands, and I made little or no attempt to keep the camera still when I was shooting. Not sure whether the image stabilization feature or the high ISO capabilities kicked in here, but I very rarely got a blurry shot unless both the camera and the subject were in rapid motion. Very happy. And never saw significant noise in my photos, although I'm not particularly sensitive on this issue. Comments on ergonomics: small camera, lighter than my smartphone, fit into pocket. Pretty easy to hold in one hand and take photos. Slightly slick surface left me worrying that it would slip out of my hands, so i often used the wrist strap. My one wish has to do with the zoom range of the lens: it's not very wide at one end, and I often found myself inconveniently backing up to take pictures of houses. And the 3X telephoto end won't get you close up to that sea otter you spot out in the ocean surf. The Panasonic Lumix TZ series is fantastic in both of these areas, but I really didn't want to sacrifice the Canon idiot-proof simplicity, compact size, and great auto-focusing capabilities. Comparisons to other cameras I've used or played with: It's faster and smaller than the Canon A570IS I bought for my parents 6 months ago, although the A570IS is easier to hold steady because of the big grip. Personally I would have preferred to use AA batteries like in the A570IS, but the battery life on the SD1100IS is great so far and the charger is tiny and light, so easy to pack for a trip. I think the IS image stabilization feature is critical for shaky hands and casual on-th-go one-handed shots, which gives it an advantage over amazing cameras like the A630. We use the A630 at work to photograph everything from building problems to new member portraits, and it's great but heavy as a brick and triple the size of the SD1100IS. I do love that articulating LCD screen, tho'. It was impossible to take discreet snapshots of people on the street with the SD1100IS -- chalk it up to pointing a pink camera in their direction, directly at eye level. With the articulating LCD you can pretend to be just fiddling with the camera while getting great spontaneous shots of your friends. All in all, a brilliant camera for someone who really does NOT WANT to learn about technical issues of doing photography. Plus, at the current price it's a total steal, over fifty bucks less than I paid at the camera store just three weeks ago, and that was on sale! diff --git a/SINAI-SA-corpus/5/ref1126_rate5.txt b/SINAI-SA-corpus/5/ref1126_rate5.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..a51b3bc72799f611101fcec4b292c48008e577a5 --- /dev/null +++ b/SINAI-SA-corpus/5/ref1126_rate5.txt @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ + CX7430 + 1GB SD card = great still cam and camcorder combo, January 3, 2005 + ByE. Lundin "eal5b" - See all my reviews +Kodak CX7430 Purchased: June 2004, used frequently MOST NOTABLE FEATURE: 640x480 VIDEO+AUDIO CAPABILITY (NO TIME LIMIT) 1) Using ordinary 1800mah NiMH rechargeable AA batteries, I have been able to take video with audio at the highest quality setting for over 55 minutes (until my memory card ran out) with the LCD screen TURNED ON the entire time, and the low battery indicator didn't even appear! 2) 1GB SD cards have fallen swiftly in price and are a great addition to this camera. My 1GB Lexar SD card can record over 55 minutes of video with audio at high quality (640 by 480 pixels, 13 frames per second), and 80 minutes at medium quality (320 by 240 pixels, 20 frames per second; max time limit is 80 minutes for this setting). A 512MB SD card can record for just over 28 minutes straight (highest setting), and a 256MB SD card for slightly over 13 minutes. 3) Most digital cameras offer video capability, but limit your filming time to 30 seconds or 3 minutes per video in most cases. Those that don't limit filming time usually provide resolution nowhere as good as the CX7430's high-quality video. (Update: Canon's SD-series cameras are a major exception. Note that you will pay much more [except for the SD110] and that you will only get about 15-25 minutes of 640x480 15fps video/audio out of a 1GB SD card. The SD300's [4MP] picture quality is about the same as the Kodak CX7430's.) 4) The camera is highly competitively priced even when compared to dedicated digital video camcorders that use memory cards rather than tapes or DVDs. Both resolution and frame rate are comparable to or even better than the "digital tapeless" camcorders I have looked at on amazon (as of October 2004), and given its still photo capability the CX7430 is bargain-priced. Anyone considering buying a digital tapeless camcorder should definitely consider this camera when deciding on their purchase. - NOTE: Videos are recorded in QUICKTIME format. PRO's: 1) Great video capability as described above. The camera's microphone is excellent--I've recorded videos in both quiet environments and an extremely loud dance club and the camera adapted perfectly to both situations--no static or undesirable anomalies (though it did not pick up much of the bass in the club, if that matters). I've even used the camera several times to record audio from my grad classes (camera simply pointed at the ceiling, medium quality video setting; I extract the audio from the file for listening). 2) Takes excellent close-up photos. 3) Photos overall are very satisfactory. 4) Compact enough to fit in an ordinary front pocket. Pretty typical size and weight for its class. 5) The LCD screen is very bright and fine for use in all but very strong direct sunlight, where the LCD image gets slightly harder to see. 6) Interface is excellent. Buttons are responsive and the mode dial is very very convenient. 7) Good start-up time, about 3 seconds and you are ready to shoot. 8) 3X zoom. Perfectly satisfactory; once you start going over 4X zoom you need a tripod to take decent photos. 9) Small speaker to hear the audio when you play back your videos. 10) Extraordinary Battery Life (see above). 11) Sturdy design. Another reviewer complained about the casing being easily scratched; I have used my camera for about 7 months now and it doesn't look a whole lot different from when I bought it. The casing/finish seems pretty normal for this type of camera. 12) Decent variety of manual options, but not enough for amatuer photography (there is no true "manual" setting). 13) Good file compression! I have seen cameras produce pictures of about the same quality (or even worse) as the CX7430 and wind up with file sizes of 1MB or more per photo. Average file size for the CX7430 ranges from 300KB to 750KB depending on the quality setting and content. 14) Fairly quick autofocus--just under one second from the time you press the picture button while the camera is pointed at an unfocused subject until the shutter closes and the picture is taken. If the subject is already in focus the picture is taken almost instantaneously. CON's: 1) Pictures are easily blurred in some environments. See Taking Photos section below. 2) Several of the provided 7 photo settings on the dial are not worth using. 3) No case provided. 4) Videos taken in the camera's high-quality setting suffer from a very low frame rate (13fps), and the image blurs badly when you move the camera around quickly in softly-lit indoor environments. That said, the video capability is still remarkable for a camera of this type (and at this price). 5) The door covering the SD card slot and the data port is sturdy but doesn't latch very strongly. 6) Zoom cannot be adjusted while taking video. You need to adjust zoom first, then start filming. Focus also does not adjust during filming, but it's not a factor unless you begin filming a landscape and then try to take close-up video without starting a new video file. Taking Photos: Overall, I think the CX7430 takes pictures pretty typical of a 4MP camera (they look about the same as pictures taken by a friend's Casio Elixim(?) 4MP camera), in terms of both its ability to focus properly and the quality of the photos produced. - Close up photos are a strong point of this camera. I use it to make photo "scans" of important documents. - Ignore the landscape, night (unless you have a tripod), and portrait settings. I haven't been to any sports events or anything similar so I haven't used the sport setting. Given the slightly blurred pictures I've gotten at football games from cameras set on Auto, this setting might be useful. - The best pictures this camera takes are: close-ups; outdoor, well-lit environments; and photos (indoor or outdoor) where the flash has been used effectively, i.e., slightly dim environments with the subject no more than say 20 feet away depending on the lighting. - I have not found any major problems with exposure or color-balance in the CX7430's pictures. If you want to take a picture of a sunset, however, focus the camera somewhere else first, then take the picture, otherwise the camera automatically adjusts to dilute the color of the sky (i.e., deep orange-pink becomes very light pink). - Pictures taken indoors in low to medium lighting *without flash* bear a strong chance of blurring unless taken by very very steady hands. Pictures taken indoors outside the range of the flash (say, distance of 25 feet or more) are pretty much guaranteed to be blurred to a significant degree unless the environment is extremely well lit. - Picture quality decreases significantly in darker environments, but this is typical of most cameras. - Two-star quality photos are fine for almost all situations. Photo dimensions increase at the three-star setting but quality is not a whole lot better. Other recommendations: - Buy rechargeable batteries, they are a must for any digital camera. I suggest 1800mah (milli-amp hours) NiMH (Nickel-Metal-Hydride) rechargeables. The batteries will pay for themselves very very quickly. - Some reviewers have liked the software included with the camera, but I usually avoid proprietary software--my understanding is that Kodak software especially is loaded with spyware/adware--and I personally have never used the software that came with the CX7430. To transfer photos, the "Microsoft Scanner and Camera Wizard" included with Windows XP has been more than adequate. (It should appear automatically when you connect the camera to your computer. If not, go to My Computer, look for the camera icon, and right click on it, then choose "Get pictures." It can also be accessed if you are using a card reader: go to My Computer, right click on the removeable drive, and choose "Autoplay," then find the wizard in the list.) The wizard lets you pick a name for the folder it will create for your photos under My Pictures, and names all of the photos and videos after the folder. I am surprised by the number of my friends who still do not use this simple, clean utility. Windows' Picture and Fax Viewer works fine for viewing photos. Editing, of course, is another matter. - Buy a large memory card to take advantage of the camera's video features. I have gotten hours of priceless video of my friends and I studying in China. There are definitely times when still pictures just won't cut it, and even if you don't get a large memory card you will appreciate the ability to take a short clip every now and then. Memory prices have plummeted over the past year and a large card is definitely a worthy investment. Bottom Line: I highly recommend the Kodak CX7430. It's not a top-of-the-line model, but for those with modest photo and video needs, this is a superb value for the price. diff --git a/SINAI-SA-corpus/5/ref1127_rate5.txt b/SINAI-SA-corpus/5/ref1127_rate5.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..4f628d617d18248e972805ea1f58415a82df1287 --- /dev/null +++ b/SINAI-SA-corpus/5/ref1127_rate5.txt @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ + A company gift, and I love this great little camera, August 9, 2004 + ByM. R. WONG - See all my reviews +I got this camera from my company's anniversary draw. I have been using this for only one week. I actually purchased the Kodak DX7440, which is more expensive and has many more features than this CX7430. I have compared photos taken from this CX7430 and DX7440, I do not see any difference for most of the photos taken. Looking at the computer screen, the colors are vivid and true, they are not satuated. There are lots of details enlarge the photos to their true sizes with photo editor software. However, if you don't know how to do this, don't worry; the Kodak CX7430 comes with a CD which lets you see the photos. Here are the easy steps: Insert the CD to your computer, install the software. Turn of your camera; connect the USB cable that comes with the camera to both the camera and your computer; then turn on your camera. The Kodak software automatically detects the photos needed to be transfer and asks if you like to transfer them now; then, you just click "transfer all photos". That easy!! The fast-speed USB cable makes fast transfer of photos and movies taken with your CX7430. You can view your photos and moview with the Kodak software with sound if it is movie. The movie feature is a very nice touch since there are times when you really want to capture some great moments in motion. This camera has TV-quality movie features and captures very good movies in detail and with good sound quality. I use 256 MP secure digital card to store up to 12 minutes of movies in the highest resolution. Taking pictures is in you control. If you like to take close shots, be sure to switch it to close capture mode otherwise it won't focus well enough. You can review the pictures in the viewfinder and enlarge it in the viewfinder and see if it is a good one taken. If not, you can delete it with the delete button. It is very easy! Taking night shots is pretty good too. The flash is enough to light up a room. I don't have trouble taking night shots with good results. Now, if you want to email pictuere to friends and relatives, the software lets you do it in this simple manner: type in "from" email address, type in "to" destination email address, select the pictures to be send from the right and click, email them now. Be sure that you do this while you are online. It also let you email pictures in low resolution for faster transfer (which is only good for viewing), or transfer in original resolution (for if the receiver may want to print the photos as well). I upload photos to Ofoto.com and print 4"x6" or 8"x10" photos. I also have a printer dock from Kodak and it laminates the prints so that the photos are free from moisture attack and finger prints. I love these features very much as it makes the pictures truely longer lasting. The only drawbacks (as with all other digital camera) are that the battery does not last long if you use the viewfinder LCD screen very ofter and the movie length is limited by the memory size of your memory card. That's why I bought the new 256 MB secure digital card. In conclusion, this is a very good camera at an attractive price from Amazon. I am just lucky that I got it free from my company. If anyone like to take great photos and like to film movies once in a while, this is it! It is lighter than a camcorder and smaller so you can carry it around easier, besides it takes much better pictures than many cameras out there including a comparable SONY. I recommend this great Kodak CX7430.