Datasets:

SouthernCrossAI
/

Arxiv

Dataset card Data Studio Files Files and versions Community

Split (1)

train · 132k rows

Filename stringlengths 22 64	Paragraph stringlengths 8 5.57k
Processed_Dynamic_Adjustment_of_the_Motivation_Degree_in_an_.txt	Gershenson, C., González, P .P. and N egrete , J. (2000). Action Selection Properties in a Software Simulated Agent. Proceedings of the 1st Mexican International Conference on Artificial Intelligence (MICAI'2000), México.
Processed_Dynamic_Adjustment_of_the_Motivation_Degree_in_an_.txt	González, P.P. and J. Neg rete (1997 ) RE DS IEX : A cooperative network of expert systems with blackboard architectures. Expert Systems, 14(4), 180-189.
Processed_Dynamic_Adjustment_of_the_Motivation_Degree_in_an_.txt	Go nzález, P.P . (200 0). Redes de Conductas Internas como Nodos Pizarrón: Selección de Acciones y Aprendizaje en un Robot. Ph.D. Dissertation. Instituto de Investigaciones Biomédicas, UNAM , México.
Processed_Dynamic_Adjustment_of_the_Motivation_Degree_in_an_.txt	González, P.P ., Negrete, J., Barreiro, A. and Gershenson, C. (2000). A Model for Combination of external and Internal Stimuli in the Ac tion Se lection of an A utono mou s Agent. Proceedings of the 1st Mexican International Conference on Artificial Intelligence (MICAI'2000), México.
Processed_Dynamic_Adjustment_of_the_Motivation_Degree_in_an_.txt	Humphrys, M (19 96) Action Selection Methods using Reinforcement Learning. In P . Maes et. al. (E ds), From Animals the Fourth International Conference on Simulation of Adaptive Behaviour MIT Press/B radford Books.
Processed_Dynamic_Adjustment_of_the_Motivation_Degree_in_an_.txt	Maes, P. (1990) A bottom-up mechanism for behaviour selection in an artificial creature. In J.A . Meyer and S.W . W ilson (Eds), From A nim als to Anim ats: Proceedings of the First International Conference on Simulation of Adaptive Behaviour MIT Press/B radford Books.
Processed_Dynamic_Adjustment_of_the_Motivation_Degree_in_an_.txt	Maes, P. (1994) Modeling Adaptive Autonomous Agents. Jou rnal of Artificia l Life, 1(1,2), M IT P ress.
Processed_Dynamic_Adjustment_of_the_Motivation_Degree_in_an_.txt	McFarland, D. (1990). What is means for robot behaviour to be adaptive. In J.A . Meyer and S.W . Wilson (Ed s), From Animals to Anim ats: Proceedings of the First International Conference on S imulation of Adaptive Behaviour MIT Press/B radford Books.
Processed_Dynamic_Adjustment_of_the_Motivation_Degree_in_an_.txt	Meyer, J.A. and Guillot, A. (1990). Simulation of adaptive behaviour in animats: Review and Prospect. In J.A. Meyer and S.W . Wilson (Eds), From Anim als to Animats: Proceedings of the First International Conference on Simulation of Adaptive Behaviour MIT Press/Bradford Books.
Processed_Dynamic_Adjustment_of_the_Motivation_Degree_in_an_.txt	Negrete, J. and M. Martínez (1996) Robotic Simulation in Ethology. Proceedings of the IASTED International Conference: Robotics and Ma nufa cturing, Hono lulu, Hawaii, USA, pp. 271-274.
Processed_Dynamic_Adjustment_of_the_Motivation_Degree_in_an_.txt	Negrete, J. and P.P. Go nzález (1998) N et of multi-agent expert systems with emergent contro l. Expert System s with Applications, 14(1) 109-116.
Processed_Asymmetric_Ejecta_of_Cool_Supergiants_and_Hypergia.txt	ABSTRACT We report new 5.5 GHz radio observations of the massive star cluster Westerlund 1, taken by the Australia Telescope Compact Array, detecting nine of the ten yellow hy- pergiants (YHGs) and red supergiants (RSGs) within the cluster. Eight of nine sources are spatially resolved. The nebulae associated with the YHGs Wd1-4a, -12a and -265 demonstrate a cometary morphology - the ﬁrst time this phenomenon has been ob- served for such stars. This structure is also echoed in the ejecta of the RSGs Wd1-20 and -26; in each case the cometary tails are directed away from the cluster core. The nebular emission around the RSG Wd1-237 is less collimated than these systems but once again appears more prominent in the hemisphere facing the cluster. Considered as a whole, the nebular morphologies provide compelling evidence for sculpting via a physical agent associated with Westerlund 1, such as a cluster wind.
Processed_Asymmetric_Ejecta_of_Cool_Supergiants_and_Hypergia.txt	Mass-loss is a fundamental agent in the evolution of massive stars, stripping away their H-rich outer layers as they evolve away from the main sequence. Stars in the ∼ 10 - 40 M(cid:12) mass- range encounter a cool red supergiant (RSG) and/or yellow hypergiant (YHG) phase, expected to be associated with sig- niﬁcant mass-loss driven by either steady-state, cool, dense stellar winds, or impulsive ejections of material (cf. Shenoy et al. 2016). Unfortunately our understanding of the winds from cool supergiants and hypergiants is not yet deeply de- veloped and uncertainties remain in commonly used pre- scriptions adopted by evolutionary codes (e.g. van Loon et al. 2005). Indeed, the situation becomes progressively worse as more massive examples are considered, since their increased rarity decreases the empirical constraints avail- able. Nevertheless the handful of known examples suggest ‘quiescent’ mass-loss rates of ≥ 10−5 M(cid:12), which may increase by an order of magnitude or more in eruptive events (Smith 2014, Shenoy et al. 2016).
Processed_Asymmetric_Ejecta_of_Cool_Supergiants_and_Hypergia.txt	the circumstellar matter resulting from winds and ejections provides an excellent probe of the mass-loss history of the star. Moreover, the nature of the circumstellar environment around these stars directly aﬀects the observational proper- ties of the eventual SNe via interaction with the SN blast- wave. It is expected that stars with initial masses between ∼9 - 18 M(cid:12) evolve into RSGs that are direct progenitors for SN IIP explosions, while more massive YHGs yield SN IIL/b (e.g. Groh et al. 2013); if one is to understand the nature of these (most) common core-collapse events one must ﬁrst understand the environment they occur within.
Processed_Asymmetric_Ejecta_of_Cool_Supergiants_and_Hypergia.txt	In this letter we highlight results from high-sensitivity ATCA radio observations of the stellar ejecta around four RSGs and ﬁve YHGs in the massive star cluster, Westerlund 1 (Wd1). These results have been compared in a qualita- tive manner to 100 GHz ALMA observations taken in 2015. Westerlund 1 is the most massive starburst cluster in the Milky Way and with an age of ∼ 5 Myr it contains an un- precedentedly rich population of very massive stars (> 200 with masses ≥ 30 M(cid:12); Clark et al. 2005). Such a cohort yields a strong cluster UV radiation ﬁeld, which results in the ionisation of otherwise neutral ejecta around the cluster RSGs and YHGs; allowing a direct determination of nebu- lar masses. Building on the results of (Dougherty et al. 2010, henceforth D10), we focus on the detailed morphology of the RSG and YHG ejecta, which provide an outstanding oppor- tunity to examine evidence for asymmetries that may betray the action of a cluster wind.
Processed_Asymmetric_Ejecta_of_Cool_Supergiants_and_Hypergia.txt	Table 1. Listed here in order: source name, spectral type, ﬂux densities for the 750 m and 6 km pointing from the 5.5 GHz measurements (in mJy), and dimensions of the ejecta (in arcseconds), with the major axis (top) and the minor axis (bottom). Also shown is the source size (in parsecs, with an assumed distance of 5 kpc), the volume of the ejecta (in cm3), and the ejecta mass estimates (in x 10−3 M(cid:12)).
Processed_Asymmetric_Ejecta_of_Cool_Supergiants_and_Hypergia.txt	Observations were taken of Westerlund 1 using ATCA (Aus- tralia Telescope Compact Array). ATCA consists of 6 an- tennas with diameters of 22 m. The observations took place from October to December 2015, in three diﬀerent conﬁgu- rations each deﬁned by their widest baseline. The 6 km con- ﬁguration was observed over 27th - 29th October, the 1.5km conﬁguration over 25th - 27th November and the 750 m con- ﬁguration over 14th - 15th December. Follow up observations on the 3rd June 2016 with the 1.5 km conﬁguration were car- ried out, due to issues caused by poor weather during the original observing period.
Processed_Asymmetric_Ejecta_of_Cool_Supergiants_and_Hypergia.txt	Data was collected over two spectral windows, centered at 5.5 and 9 GHz, each with a bandwidth of 2 GHz and 2048 1 MHz-wide channels. The total on-source integration time per pointing was ∼16 hours. The data contained observa- tions of a bandpass calibrator, 1934-638, a phase calibrator, J1636-4101 for the 6 km conﬁguration, or 1600-48 elsewhere, and a second calibrator 0823-500.
Processed_Asymmetric_Ejecta_of_Cool_Supergiants_and_Hypergia.txt	the cool super/hypergiants, seen in the 5.5 GHz observations at the 6 km pointing. Clark et al. (1998) previously identiﬁed a cometary nebula around the RSG Wd1-26, with D10 con- ﬁrming similar nebulosity around a second RSG Wd1-20, and an elliptical structure around a third RSG, Wd1-237, as well as more compact but still extended emission around three of the YHGs, Wd1-4a, -12a and -265. The greater sen- sitivity of our new observations reveals striking additional detail for these structures, while resolving the nebulae asso- ciated with the last RSG, Wd1-75 and two further YHGS, Wd1-16 and -32. This leaves only a single cluster YHG, Wd1-8, with no detection at any mm or radio frequency. In Fig 1 we present 5.5 GHz maps of these six stars, while Fig 2 presents an optical/radio montage indicating the nebulae location and orientation.
Processed_Asymmetric_Ejecta_of_Cool_Supergiants_and_Hypergia.txt	The data were ﬂagged and calibrated with the use of miriad (Sault et al. 1995). miriad was also used to perform phase and target self calibration as well as ﬁnal imaging of each conﬁguration. The images were then primary beam cor- rected and exported to casa (Common Astronomy Software Applications) for processing. The 6 km and 750 m images were analysed within casa to determine ﬂux densities and ejecta dimensions. The ﬁnal set of images created had vary- ing resolutions. The 6 km pointing at 5.5 GHz had a beam size of 2.92 × 1.54(cid:48)(cid:48) (PA -2.50◦) and at 9 GHz, a beam size of 1.71 × 0.99(cid:48)(cid:48) (PA 0.79◦). Images created from the 750 m pointing had a beam size of 13.79 × 6.98(cid:48)(cid:48) (PA 5.04◦) at 5.5 GHz, and 6.98 × 4.44(cid:48)(cid:48) (PA 6.28◦) at 9 GHz.
Processed_Asymmetric_Ejecta_of_Cool_Supergiants_and_Hypergia.txt	We present the bulk properties of the resolved nebulae in Table 1. The gaussian-ﬁtting procedure imfit in casa was used to calculate the ﬂux densities associated with the ex- tended regions for each source. First, ﬁts were performed on the 6km pointing at 9 GHz (with the highest resolution) to determine the dimensions of the central sources. The to- tal ﬂux density present in the extended emission regions for each source was then found using data from the (lower res- olution) 750 m pointings at 5.5 GHz. The ﬁnal ﬂux density was calculated by taking the total ﬂux density and subtract- ing the ﬂux present in the region covering the central com- pact source (as determined by the compact ﬁt at 9 GHz). For Wd1-26, the source ﬁt would not converge for the cen- tral source dimensions, so the value given is the total ﬂux density from running imfit on the 750 m 5.5 GHz image.
Processed_Asymmetric_Ejecta_of_Cool_Supergiants_and_Hypergia.txt	Ejecta dimensions were also taken from imfit. The ma- jor and minor axes listed are the deconvolved (i.e. hav- ing removed the eﬀect of the convolving beam) FWHM of the gaussian ﬁt taken from the 750 m 5.5 GHz observations.
Processed_Asymmetric_Ejecta_of_Cool_Supergiants_and_Hypergia.txt	Given the diﬀuse cluster emission and that of nearby sources, there is some diﬃculty in providing an accurate ﬁt that in- cludes as much of the source emission as possible but avoids incorporating emission from other stars. In comparison to the apparent emission (in Fig. 1 and 2), it is possible that the dimensions for Wd1-26 and Wd1-237 have been under- estimated. Likewise, the dimensions determined for Wd1-20 may be marginally overestimated.
Processed_Asymmetric_Ejecta_of_Cool_Supergiants_and_Hypergia.txt	The emission associated with Wd1-16a, -32 and -75 is smaller in both size and brightness. It was therefore not pos- sible to isolate these sources for ﬁtting in the lower resolution image. Flux densities and nebula dimensions were found us- ing source ﬁts on the 6 km 5.5 GHz data instead. Wd1-32 was detected, but the source was only partially resolved, so the convolving beam size was taken to represent the ejecta dimensions.
Processed_Asymmetric_Ejecta_of_Cool_Supergiants_and_Hypergia.txt	The ﬂux density values from the 750 m pointing at 5.5 GHz were used to calculate the ejecta mass. The mass value calculated is the ionised mass, ignoring the presence of neutral material. To estimate this mass, the emission mea- sure, EV , was calculated by rearranging the equation for an optically thin thermal plasma at an eﬀective temperature T, Sν = 5.7 × 10−56 T where D is the distance, set to 5 kpc, and g is the Gaunt factor, calculated from the frequency, temperature and the stellar metallicity (Leitherer & Robert 1991). Following D10, we adopt a temperature of 103 K.
Processed_Asymmetric_Ejecta_of_Cool_Supergiants_and_Hypergia.txt	where mH is the atomic mass of hydrogen and µ is the mean atomic weight, taken to be 1.5 (Leitherer et al. 1995). Errors for the ionised mass were found by propagating errors on the ejecta dimensions and ﬂux densities, given in imfit.
Processed_Asymmetric_Ejecta_of_Cool_Supergiants_and_Hypergia.txt	of Wd1-4a, 12a and 265 are the only known examples as- sociated with YHGs. In the ﬁrst two cases, the radio con- tinuum emission is of greater physical extent than the mm- continuum emission, which is more reminiscent of a ‘bow- shock’ morphology (Fig 1); Wd1-265 was not covered by the 100 GHz ALMA observations but demonstrates the clearest cometary conﬁguration of the three objects (Fenech, sub- mitted). Bow-shocks have been associated with three (ﬁeld) RSGs: Betelgeuse (Decin et al. 2012), µ Cep (Cox et al. 2012), and IRC-10414 (Gvaramadze et al. 2014), with only a single example of a cometary nebula, around GC IRS7 (Yusef - Zadeh & Morris 1991). Note that they are also com- mon around AGB stars (Cox et al. 2012). In terms of phys- ical extent and morphology, the nebulae of Wd1-26 is di- rectly comparable to GC IRS7. Strikingly, the synthesis of ALMA+ATCA data for Wd1-20 reveals that it shows both morphologies, with a compact nebular component position- ally coincident with the star, clearly displaced from a bright arc of emission (the ‘bow-shock’), both of which are em- bedded in the cometary nebula. The ejecta associated with Wd1-237 appears to be a less collimated version of Wd1- 20, with a similarly compact central source displaced from the geometrical centre of a quasi-spherical nebula with limb- brightening reminiscent of a bow-shock on the hemisphere orientated towards the cluster core.
Processed_Asymmetric_Ejecta_of_Cool_Supergiants_and_Hypergia.txt	With the exception of Wd1-75, the nebulae associated with the RSGs appear systematically more massive than those of the YHGs (Table 1), with the YHG nebulae in turn appearing less massive than those of ﬁeld YHGs, such as IRC +10420, thought to be in a post-RSG phase (Fenech, submitted). There are two distinct scenarios for this diﬀer- ence in YHG and RSG nebular properties in Wd1: (i) the YHGs in this cluster are pre-RSG objects and not yet sub- ject to the major mass loss of the RSGs, or (ii) the YHGs are post-RSG objects and hence the nebulae ejected in the RSG phase have been exposed to the cluster wind for longer and hence have suﬀered more erosion. It is tempting to attribute the diﬀerences between both classes of object within Wd1 as an evolutionary eﬀect, with the YHGs yet to encounter the RSG phase and associated heavy, impulsive mass-loss. There is a general expectation of a systematic diﬀerence be- tween wind properties of RSGs and YHGs, with those of the former thought to be slower, denser and cooler than the latter (D10, Fenech, submitted). If the diﬀerence in nebular properties results from the diﬀering evolutionary phases, one might speculate that the lack of nebulosity associated with Wd1-8 is a result of the star only recently entering the YHG phase, although more prosaic explanations - i.e. the star is at a large displacement from the cluster core along our line of sight, such that the cluster radiation ﬁeld is insuﬃcient to ionise any ejecta - are possible.
Processed_Asymmetric_Ejecta_of_Cool_Supergiants_and_Hypergia.txt	In this study, high sensitivity 5.5 GHz ATCA observations were exploited to demonstrate the presence of asymmetric ejecta around cool RSGs and YHGs in the young massive cluster Westerlund 1. Very few ejection nebulae are known to be associated with highly luminous RSGs and still fewer with YHGs (Shenoy et al. 2016); as a consequence the detec- tion of nine surrounding some of the most extreme examples within the Galaxy (initial mass ∼ 40 M(cid:12): Ritchie et al. 2010, Clark et al. 2014) provides a unique opportunity to study the dynamic mass-loss processes of these evolutionary phases.
Processed_Asymmetric_Ejecta_of_Cool_Supergiants_and_Hypergia.txt	Nevertheless, the striking cometary nebulae of the RSGs Wd1-20 and 26, the ‘bow-shock’ YHG nebulae and cru- cially the orientation of all these with respect to the clus- ter core compellingly argue for interaction with a physical agent(s) associated with the cluster. By analogy to classical runaways, motion through an ambient intracluster medium (revealed via X-ray observations; Muno et al. 2006) might sculpt the nebulosity, but this would requre all such objects to be infalling at supersonic velocities (‘run-towards’) which would appear contrived.
Processed_Asymmetric_Ejecta_of_Cool_Supergiants_and_Hypergia.txt	Figure 1. Shown are images of the YHGs and RSGs and their associated extended emission, from the 5.5GHz observations at 6km. Sources are: the YHGs Wd1-4a (top-left), Wd1-12a (top-centre), Wd1-265 (top-right), Wd1-16a (middle-left) and Wd1-32 (centre). These images are followed by the RSGs, Wd1-20 (middle-right), Wd1-26 (bottom-left) and Wd1-237 (bottom-centre) and Wd1-75 (bottom-right). The colourscale shows the hypergiants from the 5.5GHz observations at the 6km pointing, with the overlaid contours from 100 GHz ALMA observations of the cluster with a resolution of 750 × 570 mas (Fenech, submitted). W265 was out of the ﬁeld of view for ALMA, so is overlaid with contours of the 9 GHz ATCA observations from the 6km pointing. The contour levels of the ALMA observations are -1, 1, 1.414, 2, 2.828, 4, 5.656, 8, 11.31, 16, 22.62, 32, 45.25, 64 and 90.50 × 3σ (σ = 52.4 µJy for Wd1-4a, 40.0 µJy for Wd1-12a, 24.3 µJy for Wd1-16a, 28.1 µJy for Wd1-32, 30.5 µJy for Wd1-20, 63.7 µJy for Wd1-26, 31.9 µJy for Wd1-237 and 26.2 µJy for Wd1-75). The 6km pointing at 9 GHz has contour levels of 3, 6, 9, 12, 24, 48, and 192 × 15.0 µJy.
Processed_Asymmetric_Ejecta_of_Cool_Supergiants_and_Hypergia.txt	Figure 2. The central image shows the 2009 set of ATCA radio observations of Westerlund 1 (D10). Left are Wd1-75, -16a, -265, -26 and -20, and right are Wd1-4, -12a, -237, and -32, with the blue lines and central boxes indicating their place within the cluster. This image demonstrates the clear link between the direction of the asymmetry and the placement of the stellar objects in the cluster.
Processed_Asymmetric_Ejecta_of_Cool_Supergiants_and_Hypergia.txt	It would seem more likely that their morphologies are due to interactions with an outﬂowing cluster wind, or the winds of ionising radiation ﬁelds of nearby massive stars, or supernova. The presence of a magnetar within Wd1 indicates at least one such recent event, with the mass of Wd1 im- plying a rate of occurence of 7000 - 13,000 yr−1 (Muno et al. 2006). Mackey et al. (2015) favour stellar wind interaction as the sculpting agent for the Wd1-26 nebula, but this analysis also demonstrates that models tailored for the immediate cluster environment of individual stars will be required to fully understand these systems.
Processed_Asymmetric_Ejecta_of_Cool_Supergiants_and_Hypergia.txt	Red supergiants and yellow hypergiants mark pivotal late phases in the evolution of massive stars. Furthermore, the properties of circumstellar matter associated with the progenitor RSGs and YHGs will aﬀect the intra-cluster medium in Wd1, including the extent of cavities and ﬁl- aments, which is pertinent to the morphology and devel- opment of the subsequent young supernova remnant (e.g. Vink 2012). Also, our results provide new perspectives on the manner by which these stars are directly aﬀected by the massive cluster they are embedded in.
Processed_Asymmetric_Ejecta_of_Cool_Supergiants_and_Hypergia.txt	A more complete analysis of the ATCA dataset, con- taining all the detected cluster members, is underway (An- drews, in prep), with direct quantitative comparisons be- tween this data and the previous ATCA observations (D10), and recent ALMA observations (Fenech, submitted) to be made.
Processed_Asymmetric_Ejecta_of_Cool_Supergiants_and_Hypergia.txt	H. Andrews wishes to acknowledge STFC for the funding of a PhD Studentship. D. Fenech wishes to acknowledge fund- ing from a STFC consolidated grant (ST/M001334/1).

Subsets and Splits