Biden moves to decriminalize Marijuana

https://www.wsj.com/politics/policy<wbr>/biden-administration-wants-to-recl<wbr>assify-marijuana-as-less-dangerous-<wbr>drug-d6735b23
https://apnews.com/article/marijuan<wbr>a-biden-dea-criminal-justice-pot-f8<wbr>33a8dae6ceb31a8658a5d65832a3b8
https://www.usatoday.com/story/news<wbr>/nation/2024/04/30/dea-reclassifies<wbr>-marijuana-reports/72865632007/

WASHINGTON (AP) — The U.S. Drug Enforcement Administration will move to reclassify marijuana as a less dangerous drug, The Associated Press has learned, a historic shift to generations of American drug policy that could have wide ripple effects across the country.

The DEA’s proposal, which still must be reviewed by the White House Office of Management and Budget, would recognize the medical uses of cannabis and acknowledge it has less potential for abuse than some of the nation’s most dangerous drugs. However, it would not legalize marijuana outright for recreational use.

The agency’s move, confirmed to the AP on Tuesday by five people familiar with the matter who spoke on the condition of anonymity to discuss the sensitive regulatory review, clears the last significant regulatory hurdle before the agency’s biggest policy change in more than 50 years can take effect.

Once OMB signs off, the DEA will take public comment on the plan to move marijuana from its current classification as a Schedule I drug, alongside heroin and LSD. It moves pot to Schedule III, alongside ketamine and some anabolic steroids, following a recommendation from the federal Health and Human Services Department. After the public comment period and a review by an administrative judge, the agency would eventually publish the final rule.

It comes after President Joe Biden called for a review of federal marijuana law in October 2022 and moved to pardon thousands of Americans convicted federally of simple possession of the drug. He has also called on governors and local leaders to take similar steps to erase marijuana convictions.

“Criminal records for marijuana use and possession have imposed needless barriers to employment, housing, and educational opportunities,” Biden said in December. “Too many lives have been upended because of our failed approach to marijuana. It’s time that we right these wrongs.”

The election year announcement could help Biden, a Democrat, boost flagging support, particularly among younger voters.

Biden and a growing number of lawmakers from both major political parties have been pushing for the DEA decision as marijuana has become increasingly decriminalized and accepted, particularly by younger people. A Gallup poll last fall found 70% of adults support legalization, the highest level yet recorded by the polling firm and more than double the roughly 30% who backed it in 2000.

The DEA didn’t respond to repeated requests for comment.

Schedule III drugs are still controlled substances and subject to rules and regulations, and people who traffic in them without permission could still face federal criminal prosecution.

Some critics argue the DEA shouldn’t change course on marijuana, saying rescheduling isn’t necessary and could lead to harmful side effects.

Jack Riley, a former deputy administrator of the DEA, said he had concerns about the proposed change because he thinks marijuana remains a possible “gateway drug,” one that may lead to the use of other drugs.

“But in terms of us getting clear to use our resources to combat other major drugs, that’s a positive,” Riley said, noting that fentanyl alone accounts for more than 100,000 deaths in the U.S. a year.

On the other end of the spectrum, others argue marijuana should be treated the way alcohol is.

Last week, 21 Democrats led by Senate Majority Leader Sen. Chuck Schumer of New York sent a letter to DEA Administrator Anne Milgram and Attorney General Merrick Garland arguing marijuana should be dropped from the controlled-substances list and instead regulated like alcohol.

“It is time for the DEA to act,” the lawmakers wrote. “Right now, the Administration has the opportunity to resolve more than 50 years of failed, racially discriminatory marijuana policy.”

Federal drug policy has lagged behind many states in recent years, with 38 having already legalized medical marijuana and 24 legalizing its recreational use.

That’s helped fuel fast growth in the marijuana industry, with an estimated worth of nearly $30 billion. Easing federal regulations could reduce the tax burden that can be 70% or more for businesses, according to industry groups. It could also make it easier to research marijuana, since it’s very difficult to conduct authorized clinical studies on Schedule I substances.

The immediate effect of rescheduling on the nation’s criminal justice system would likely be more muted, since federal prosecutions for simple possession have been fairly rare in recent years.

But loosening restrictions could carry a host of unintended consequences in the drug war and beyond.

Critics point out that as a Schedule III drug, marijuana would remain regulated by the DEA. That means the roughly 15,000 cannabis dispensaries in the U.S. would have to register with the DEA like regular pharmacies and fulfill strict reporting requirements, something that they are loath to do and that the DEA is ill equipped to handle.

Then there’s the United States’ international treaty obligations, chief among them the 1961 Single Convention on Narcotic Drugs, which requires the criminalization of cannabis. In 2016, during the Obama administration, the DEA cited the U.S.’ international obligations and the findings of a federal court of appeals in Washington in denying a similar request to reschedule marijuana.
___

It's over. Biden just won the 2024 election.

Time to buy back into some of those cannabis corps until this actually goes through.

Buy on rumor, sell on news.

>>1291505
This is not rumor, the DEA proposal to reclassify is already moving through the system. Granted that it will take months before it's enacted but this is more than just a whispers about what might happen, it's actually happening.

jews rape kids

Jim Crow Joe and his handlers making more false promises before an election. <br>Where have I seen this before?

Anonymous

>>1291522
What makes you think the promises are false (besides your far-right indoctrination) ?

>>1291497
At very least his approval rating just went up 30 or 40 points.

>>1291536
>30 or 40 points.
the absolute delusional

>>1291539
So how much do you think his rating is going to go up from this then, Nate Silver?

>>1291542
absolutely none, because nobody buys this ridiculous bullshit.

>>1291544
What in your mind makes it ridiculous bullshit (besides your far-right indoctrination) ?

>>1291566
They aren't going to legalize weed, and even if they did it wouldn't make any difference in voting, which is why nobody cares and they aren't going to.

>>1291567
No one said he was going to legalize it, just move it from Schedule I to Schedule III. It still would be as illegal as ketamine, just not as illegal as heroin or cocaine as it is now.

the check's in the mail, i promise not to cum inside you

>>1291508
>After 50+ years in government he's finally going to do it, faggots! It's definitely going to happen this time! They surely wouldn't keep lying about it forever!

for sure gonna happen AFTER the election

>>1291592
I don't get why you think it wouldn't happen ASAP

>>1291594
I understand you hate the government but give them some credit for fixing something they got wrong 80 years ago.

>>1291608
Wow, this guy ova 'ere knows the long term effects of marijuana.
Betcha he also knows the long term effects of second hand marijuana smoke on children, and marijuana's effects on developing children, ove 'ere.

>>1291629
Name something besides water you ingest which doesn't have any long term effects. The air you breathe has long term effects ffs.

>>1291632
Thanks, retard.
>Everything has effects
No shit. BUT WHAT ARE THE NEGATIVE EFFECTS?
Fucking moron.

>>1291487
>hey jack, I know you're real torn up about the whole Palestine thing. How 'bout you have a joint and loosen up?

>>1291647
Ask Andy Kaufman. Oh wait you can't because he died of lung cancer 40 years ago despite never smoking anything.

>>1291650
Even Fauci admitted cigarettes don't cause lung cancer during the pandemic.
Short answer is: you have no answer.

>>1291656
we've reached peak contrarianism

>>1291663
Are you trying to be an edgy contrarian?

>>1291508
>It's definitely going to happen this time! They surely wouldn't keep lying about it forever!
I have no clue where you people get the idea that federal policy like this depends on what the president feels like and not national sentiment. You do realize that support for marijuana legalization has only peaked in the last 10 or so years, right? In what universe would Biden, or congress attempt to legalize marijuana in like 1994 when national polls were at like 15% in favor?

>>1291567
There are tons of people who have never voted that would come out in support of him if he legalized it. There are probably even life long Republicans who would flip if he did it

>>1291696
>You do realize that support for marijuana legalization has only peaked in the last 10 or so years, right?
..I have to imagine that the people who say shit like this have never actually smoked cannabis, or been around other people who smoke cannabis.
In states like Washington, cannabis runs through the state like a river and has done so for half a century. Everybody knows at least one person who smokes.
Also, legalization means literally nothing. People who have indulged in the lightning lettuce are going to continue to purchase it illegally because the taxes on cannabis make it prohibitively expensive to purchase through dispensaries.

>>1291696
>national sentiment shapes policy
wow, that's bright, had to shield my eyes

>>1291698
>..I have to imagine that the people who say shit like this have never actually smoked cannabis, or been around other people who smoke cannabis.
It speaks a lot about your engagement with the topic that you think smoking weed or being around people who smoke weed has anything to do with national politics. Having a bunch of friends that smoke weed is great but that's an irrelevant anecdote. Polling and legislative support is what indicates where laws are going - not how many people you know that smoke weed.

>In states like Washington, cannabis runs through the state like a river and has done so for half a century. Everybody knows at least one person who smokes.
That's great. This has no impact on anything I said. National support for legalizing marijuana, in the 1990s and on a federal level, hovered around 15-20%. People didn't want it. As time moved on and support grew, the more liberal states like Oregon, California and Washington legalized at first and its been progressing ever since. This is just an objective fact.

>Also, legalization means literally nothing.
Well, you're wrong, both economically and criminally.

>>1291700
>wow, that's bright, had to shield my eyes
Yeah, imagine being in a thread with people so low IQ that you actually have to say something this obvious.

>>1291703
>It speaks a lot about your engagement with the topic that you think smoking weed or being around people who smoke weed has anything to do with national politics.
Didn't we just establish that federal policy is based on national sentiment?
Would you like to try again, reddit-spacing retard-kun?
>That's great. This has no impact on anything I said.
You should spend more time reading the posts of the anons you are trying to mimic.
>Well, you're wrong, both economically and criminally.
Confirmed for not living in a legal state.

>>1291714
>Didn't we just establish that federal policy is based on national sentiment?
Your friends who you smoke weed with are not the nation you fucking moron. "National polls say this thing is unpopular but everyone I know really likes it!" is the argument of a toddler. The world is larger than your social circle. Your personal anecdotes are irrelevant to national sentiment, anon.

>You should spend more time reading the posts of the anons you are trying to mimic.
Not an argument.

>Confirmed for not living in a legal state.
Not an argument. Thanks for playing.

>>1291714
>>Well, you're wrong, both economically and criminally.
>Confirmed for not living in a legal state.
Legal marijuana brings in billions of dollars in taxable revenue for states every year. California alone has made over 5B since 2018
https://www.cdtfa.ca.gov/news/23-07<wbr>.htm#:~:text=Since%20January%202018<wbr>%2C%20total%20cannabis,of%20cannabi<wbr>s%20tax%20reform%20legislation.

>>1291717
>Legal marijuana brings in billions of dollars in taxable revenue for states every year.
Compare and contrast this to the black market, which has existed for fifty years at the very least.

>>1291720
>Compare and contrast this to the black market, which has existed for fifty years at the very least.
The contrast is that the black market doesn't generate revenue for the state you absolute buffoon.

>>1291716
> "National polls say this thing is unpopular but everyone I know really likes it!"
Anon, states have been holding massive weed conferences and festivals before you were born.

There are literally acres of wild cannabis plants growing in the ditches of the I-5 corridor from California to Washington because smokers pick the seeds out of their weed and throwing it out the window. You're a faggot liar if you think weed only became popular in the last ten years.

>>1291721
>an industry doesn't generate revenue for the state
>that means the industry doesn't exist
Alright you guys need to kill yourselves, you're clearly too stupid to argue with.

>>1291722
>Anon, states have been holding massive weed conferences and festivals before you were born.
This has absolutely nothing to do with voter sentiment, anon.

>There are literally acres of wild cannabis plants growing in the ditches of the I-5 corridor from California to Washington because smokers pick the seeds out of their weed and throwing it out the window. You're a faggot liar if you think weed only became popular in the last ten years.
I don't really know how to speak to you. You seem to conflate people who smoke weed with active voting populaces and I don't know how to bridge that gap for you. If you had bothered to read anything I said my claim was that ELECTORAL SUPPORT FOR LEGALIZING MARIJUANA has only peaked in the last ten years or so, not people who like and smoke weed. Please, anon, this conversation will go so much smoother if you just read what people are saying to you before reflexively responding.

>>1291723
You're actually illiterate. You're not following the conversation at all.

>>1291721
>"Compare and contrast state revenue to the black market!"
>"Well, the contrast is that the black market doesn't generate revenue for the state"
>"OH SO YOU'RE SAYING THE BLACK MARKET DOESN'T EXIST???"
Please go away. The adults are talking here.

>>1291717
Now tell me how much the private prison system made off marijuana incarcerations in just one year

>Biden literally pulling an Andrew Cuomo
Ironic, his penning of the 1994 crime bill put thousands of people in jail for marijuana possession- now he thinks undoing his crime against humanity will save his election chances? Lmao

>>1291754
Republicans loved it what are you talking about

>>1291766
Well, none of us thought it was a bad thing.
We're just pointing out your ideological inconsistency, knowing full well you don't really care.

>>1291754
The 1994 crime bill actually didn't alter drug crime laws or enforcement. Had to do with a ton of other shit, but not that.

Not saying Biden never had involvement with the criminalization of drug use/sales, but you're just wrong on this shit.

Also it's poetic, not ironic. He campaigned on reducing drug enforcement vis a vis pot and this is broadly politically popular, especially after decades of the drug war proving an abject and costly failure and pot turning out to have medical uses and being less destructive than alcohol or tobacco.

>>1291777
It's really funny to see people criticizing the democrats for the crime bill in the 90s when the entire point was Newt Gringrich's hyperconservative house of reps wouldn't allow passage of anything less stringent.

>>1291566
Because by now stoners actually read these laws and can identify a nothingburger as it isn't getting legalized for recreational use. Getting it legalized in so many states required us to take actual political action and with the internet making it so much easier to communicate, we've gotten a lot better at identifying this shit. Besides, we're all getting it decriminalized where it counts these days, in state law, or just doing it illegally already, nobody gives a shit.

>>1291571
This.

>>1291751
Kamala Harris made plenty off it.

>>1291784
Biden authored the bill though.
And I'm not criticizing it, but you Biden supporters and voters sure should be.
Instead, you voted for Biden.
What retards.

>>1291792
Shhhh. They don't know their biggest beefs with the US criminal justice system are due to their team.
It's funny. Keep laughing at them.

>>1291803
>Instead, you voted for Biden.
Because he said he'd loosen current laws.
>What retards.
He's loosening current laws, dipshit. That's what this thread is about.

The
>You fucking dipshit, you voted for the same bullshit that fucked up last time and expected a different outcome and just got the same bullshit again.
criticism doesn't work when we actually get a different fucking outcome.

How many more felonies do you want your candidate to get the opportunity to rack up, btw? Trump's not even promising to change. He's just promising to fail to make america great again again.

>>1291813
>The guy whose policy I hate said he'd reverse policy.
Listen 'ere to this copin' sack'a bananas.

>>1291487
I hope the UK does this too. But the UK will never follo suit, because the UK is built to n misery and suffering. They can't allow people to get even a whiff of real laxation or freedom, lest they wake up and realise how much they've been scammed their whole life and their want more.

anon

>>1291805
>Shhhh. They don't know their biggest beefs with the US criminal justice system are due to their team.
>It's funny. Keep laughing at them.

what did they mean by this?

Anonymous

>>1291833
You guys have an election coming up, don't you? You could at least try to get the ball rolling.

>>1291813
>criticism doesn't work when we actually get a different fucking outcome.

The big dripping dick of the criminal justice system finally removing itself from your asshole isn't proof the dick is now your friend because you voted correctly. It means you literally suffer from Stockholm syndrome and allow politicians to abuse you because you're a servile nitwit. Both Biden and Harris built their careers on putting people in jail for pot possession, Harris especially while she was in Cali.

It has nothing to do with doing whats right or even what he promised, and you know it. The only reason he's doing this is because he's getting BTFO in the polls. Andrew Cuomo tried this in NY and they still literally ran him out of office so hard he left his dog behind.

You're happy to be a lick-spittle for corruption and power as long as it throws you a bone in your cage once in a while. Pathetic.

>>1291698
every white person i know in CA buys from dispensaries

>>1291698
>>1291888
I guess I should actually say LA, Humboldt I'm sure doesnt buy from dispensaries

>>1291497
>>1291536
why do you think there are that many weed addicts?
>>1291487
expect a massive crime spike. every single time weed has been legalized crimes has gone up because weed makes people violent retards

>>1291900
there are dozens of peer reviewed articles that show how in places like oregon violent crime and property crime when up when weed was legalized or in norway how weed was associated with violence in men. I don't understand why you retards think a highly addictive drug that fucks with people's brains doesn't do anything

>>1291902
How's it feel to be perpetually stuck in 1950?

Freedom hating Republicans just can't stop being fascist faggots

>>1291697
If it's legalized and that's all they care about, why would they bother to vote for him after the fact?

>>1291904
Legalize weed, but ban menthols. Hmmm.

>>1291903
>no argument
>muh 50s
you are a weed addict
>>1291904
>banning guns and speech is fine
>no don't ban muh narcotic I am addicted to, this is fascism reeeeeeeeeee

>>1291906
>doesn't even realize he just got BTFO
(You)

>>1291889
CA allows you to get weed cards from """doctors""" for migraines. It has practically been legal way before it was legalized state-wide.
At least one person you know probably grows as a hobby and gives it away for free.

>>1291816
>The guy whose policy I hate said he'd reverse policy.
And he is actively doing that. This isn't a "we're looking into it" step. This is actual fucking progress, you fucking idiot.

>>1291880
>The big dripping dick of the criminal justice system finally removing itself from your asshole isn't proof the dick is now your friend because you voted correctly
I didn't say it was. Cope and seethe.

>It has nothing to do with doing whats right or even what he promised, and you know it.
I genuinely don't care what it has to do with as long as I get what I want.

>You're happy to be a lick-spittle for corruption
I'm not a Republican voter.

You seem very mad that a good thing is happening.

>>1291912
I'm pretty sure you are just high and don't know what is going on

>>1291916
>And he is actively doing that. This isn't a "we're looking into it" step. This is actual fucking progress, you fucking idiot.
I'm not the idiot who voted for the guy that voted for everything I hate.
Simply imagine how retarded one must be to willingly vote and advocate for the single worst person to be president since Jimmy Carter.
Even worse that Biden has had a storied history of creating legislature and voting for legislature that you hate.
What an idiot you are. It's astounding.

>>1291924
> the single worst person to be president since Jimmy Carter.
More like FDR.
Can't wait until the vaxx comes home to roost.

>>1291924
>>1291925
trump sure made you folks delusional

>>1291919
You are "pretty sure" about that and a lot of other bullshit which has no basis in reality

>>1291931
yeah, you are high and have a small penis

>>1291924
>I'm not the idiot who voted for the guy that voted for everything I hate.
You voted for a subhuman conman that did nothing but make America shittier and corrupt government for his personal benefit.

If you don't hate what you voted for, that just makes you stupid AND evil.

>Even worse that Biden has had a storied history of creating legislature and voting for legislature that you hate.
Yes. I know. I don't care. He's done a ton of shit I support in office. Would I rather someone who didn't fuck up a ton in the past be doing all this shit? Sure. But the shit getting done is what is most important.

I can hate the guy for his past fuckups and still applaud and accept the good shit he's doing now.

>>1291925
>Can't wait until the vaxx comes home to roost.
The vax released under Trump and he promotes it to this day. Anyway, shouldn't it have come home to roost by now? How many years of testing do you expect shit to go through before release?

>>1291905
>Hey this guy legalized that thing we've been asking about for decades now. I wonder what else he might give us
I'd assume that line of logic is what Biden and his team are hoping for if he were to legalize it.

>>1291939
>You voted for a subhuman conman that did nothing but make America shittier
by what metrics, cripple?

>>1291942
>by what metrics, cripple?
Employment, life expectancy, extra judicial killings, foreign relations, civil rights, governmental ethics, national security, honestly you'd be hard-pressed to come up with a metric Trump didn't make worse.

>>1291947
Ironically, operation warp speed was pretty based. Its funny that Trump wanted to take a victory lap for using U.S. ingenuity to produce a vaccine at lightning speed but his followers are so schizophrenic and conspiracy brained that he had to stop and do a complete 180.

>>1291948
You have to keep in mind at the time Operation Warp Speed was going on, before the conspiracy theories about the origin took over, Trump's followers were still denying that the virus existed.

>>1291950
I seem to remember them going to party in China town after calling the dRumpf a rassist.

>>1291975
I seem to remember the reason for Nancy's visit to Chinatown was to have a press conference denouncing Trump calling it the "China Virus" because asian people in San Francisco were getting their teeth knocked in by chuds who thought they spread it.

>>1291975
>Trump supporters are retarded and were saying the virus didn't exist while hundreds of thousands of people were dying
>"YEAH WELL NANCY PELOSI DID THIS THING ONE TIME!"
Nice whatabout.

>>1291980
Sorry the blacks did that. Democrats are terrible people.
>>1291982
>Does a strawman
>Complains about a whataboutism
Point that critical lens at yourself, faggot.

>>1291980
You must have a poor memory then because chuds aren't real. Just your left-wing indoctrination.

>>1291947
Crippletroon headcanon is wild asf.

>>1291985
>Does a strawman
What part about Trump supporters massively spreading anti-vax conspiracies and coining the phrase "plandemic" to imply that the virus wasn't real and orchestrated by the government who covers up ivermectin research and inflates death numbers a strawman? Which part of that is not accurate?

>Point that critical lens at yourself, faggot.
There's nothing I can say that will make sense to you were not conscious during 2019-Present.

>>1291989
>Literally cannot stop thinking about trannies
Seek help

>>1291989
What the fuck is a crippletroon?

>>1291992
Crippletroon is literally a tranny though.

>>1292080
Check the 4chan invasion Discord. He posts pics of his micro penis and all the faggots call it a clit.
LMFAO.

>>1291991
>What part about Trump supporters massively spreading anti-vax conspiracies and coining the phrase "plandemic" to imply that the virus wasn't real and orchestrated by the government who covers up ivermectin research and inflates death numbers a strawman? Which part of that is not accurate?
The part where blacks attacked the Chinese over the China virus which came from a Chinese lab, nice attempt at goal post shifting.
Besides that, many people who aren't Trump supporters now believe it was a plandemic.
In fact, it was obviously a plandemic orchestrated by the UN/WEF/WHO.

>>1292281
Well-established facts don't belong on /x/, Slapnuts.

>>1292336
Your alternative facts aren't real.

>>1291487
Since when does what Berlin does matter anyway?

>>1292469
Since now when marijuana is being decriminalized in America.

>>1292521
But it isn't. It's still going to be illegal at the federal level.


Mexican President Joe Biden Sends His Mexican Buddies to Invade

Here are the top American cities Joe Biden is sending hundreds of thousands of paroled migrants - so is YOUR home town on the list?

The Department of Homeland Security revealed that it sent over 200,000 migrants on a controversial parole program to 45 cities across the United States between January and August 2023.

The policy, which was enacted in October 2022, allowed migrants who had not entered the country illegally to fly directly into America.

Migrants were also required to have a sponsor in the US and pass various vetting tests.

It was initially announced for Venezuelans, before adding Haitians, Nicaraguans and Cubans amid one of the worst migrant crises in American history under President Joe Biden and Department of Homeland Security Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas.

Around 80 percent of the migrants were sent to four cities in the state of Florida: Miami - which got 91,821, more than any other city - Fort Lauderdale, Orlando and Tampa Bay were among the top 15 destinations, according to the DHS.

Under fire Secretary Mayorkas says the program led to a reduction in people from those nations illegally crossing the border.

'It is a key element of our efforts to address the unprecedented level of migration throughout our hemisphere, and other countries around the world see it as a model to tackle the challenge of increased irregular migration that they too are experiencing,' Mayorkas said.

New York City, Houston, Los Angeles and San Francisco were also in the top 10 of destinations.

Another 1.6million migrants are waiting to get into the country via this same program, DHS claims.

Multiple states, including Florida, have attempted to sue to stop the program but have thus far been unsuccessful.

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/ar<wbr>ticle-13369727/American-cities-Joe-<wbr>Biden-sending-hundreds-thousands-pa<wbr>roled-migrants.html?ico=related-rep<wbr>lace

'Biden's parole program is unlawful, and constitutes an abuse of constitutional authority. Florida is currently suing Biden to shut it down, and we believe that we will prevail,' said Governor Ron DeSantis' press secretary, Jeremy Redfern.

Since Biden took office, the U.S. has seen record-high numbers of illegal border crossings.

Customs and Border Protection has apprehended more than 7.6 million migrants illegally crossing the southern border – the majority of which are traveling from Central and South American countries in efforts to claim asylum in the U.S.

The crisis at the border has been a scandal for the Biden administration throughout his presidency, with former President and 2024 opponent Donald Trump promising to fix the problem.

Trump is ready to reshape American policy and detailed in interviews with TIME Magazine what some of these sweeping overhauls would include.

In a wide-ranging interview at Trump's Mar-a-Lago resort in Palm Beach, Florida on April 12, the former president confirmed he would use detention camps to house illegal immigrants during deportation efforts.

He also didn't rule out deploying the military to round up the millions of undocumented immigrants living in the country. As of January 2022, the illegal immigrant population in the U.S. was estimated to stand at 11.35 million.

Trump has repeatedly said he would take aggressive actions to address the border issue on Day One of a second term after President Joe Biden reversed almost all of his policies and plunged the country into an all-out illegal immigration crisis.

His proposals would include tapping local law enforcement, National Guard and, if necessary, members of the U.S. Military to round up illegal immigrants for deportation.

TIME National Politics Reporter Eric Cortellessa asked Trump if he would override the Posse Comitatus Act, which states the U.S. military cannot be deployed against civilians.

'They're coming in by the millions. I believe we have 15 million now. And I think you'll have 20 million by the time this ends,' Trump predicted. 'And that's bigger than almost every state.'

He also said it isn't likely he would have to house these immigrants in detention camps because he plans to deport them swiftly – but he didn't rule out building more holding centers if needed during the operation.

'No, I would not rule out anything,' Trump said. 'But there wouldn't be that much of a need for them [detention camps], because of the fact that we're going to be moving them out. We're going to bring them back from where they came.'

Umm...how do you get them into an American court if you don't want them to step foot in the country?

>>1291847
>get them into an American court
Why would that be anyone's goal?

My favorite part about this story is that it conflicts itself:
>'Biden's parole program is unlawful, and constitutes an abuse of constitutional authority. Florida is currently suing Biden to shut it down, and we believe that we will prevail,' said Governor Ron DeSantis' press secretary, Jeremy Redfern.
Here, The Daily Mail suggests they care about the law.
>He also didn't rule out deploying the military to round up the millions of undocumented immigrants living in the country.
But here, They are actively pushing for mass human trafficking and other widely illegal actions that will probably get struck out in the Supreme Court (Conservative or not).

>>1291848
Well it's necessary in order to deal with their application status. Do you just not want people allowed in the country?

>>1291852
>Well it's necessary in order to deal with their application status
No it isn't, and no country in the world operates like this.

>>1291854
It took 5 seconds.
https://www.government.nl/topics/as<wbr>ylum-policy/asylum-procedure

>>1291855
Nothing on that website says what you think it says, and I certainly don't give a fuck what they do in the Netherlands.

>>1291856
>Make widely strong claim
>Get BTFO'd
>W-Well only places I care about count...

>>1291859
>As a rule, they are denied admission to the Netherlands. A border procedure is started to deal with their application for asylum. The asylum seeker remains in the application centre at Schiphol Airport for the duration of this procedure.
>If the individual is from one of the countries on the list of safe countries of origin, or if there are indications that they already receive protection in another EU member state, a special accelerated asylum procedure applies.
So basically faggot, they don't let rapefugees wander the country, even in cuckland. Learn to read. If they came in by plane they're sent to a camp to be processed, and if they didn't they don't get in at all. Nothing like the madness the US government is doing over here.

>>1291862
Keep reading, kiddo.
>Asylum seekers whose application is denied may apply to the district court for judicial review of the IND’s decision. They are often allowed to remain in the Netherlands while their case is being considered.
>They are often allowed to remain in the Netherlands while their case is being considered.
>allowed to remain in the Netherlands

>>1291864
>in in the Netherlands
In the processing camp, retard. If they arrived by plane. Learn. To. Read. GGBTFO.

>>1291865
>We make up things in the url
Would be based if no one looked in the link.

https://www.gob.mx/sre/prensa/mexic<wbr>o-s-migration-policy-is-sovereign-s<wbr>eeks-to-protect-migrants-rights
>In response to the unilateral decision of the U.S. government to implement Article 235(b)(2)(C) of its Immigration and Nationality Act, Mexico has opted to assist the migrants. For humanitarian reasons, and as a temporary measure, the Mexican government has authorized the entry of some asylum seekers from the United States while they wait for their hearing with the appropriate authorities. The alternative, deporting them from our country, would mean denying the right of asylum that the Mexican government upholds and protects.
Magacultistbros....it's time for us to abandon the thread...

>>1291868
Isn't illegals staying in Mexico a good thing?

>>1291866
The link quite literally says they're required to remain the camp and are not allowed to freely travel

You're retarded

>>1291868
>the Mexican government has authorized the entry of some asylum seekers from the United States while they wait for their hearing with the appropriate authorities

So they're allowed to travel freely or they have to stay in a certain facility for migrants? Hmmmmmmm

>dailymail
Fake, yellow journalism lol. Believing it is absolute proof of a stupid person

meanwhile 50 immigrants go to Boston and the progressive liberal yuppies start buying guns and threatening to vote out the councilors whose genitals they slobbered upon months before<br>watching the main Boston subreddit go from pro-immigration to anti-immigration has been a real treat

>>1291893
You must not be American, everyone knows Boston is racist

>>1291891
Agreed on the Daily Mail being complete shit, but least OP pasted the article text, which is more than what most of the kneejerking retards on this board can do.

>>1291844
weird how dems like sending illegals to red states so much
>>1291847
>>1291852
remain in mexico worked under trump. also they can do skype court dates like what happened under coof

>>1291868
>mexico is aiding migrants to get into the US because mexico doesn't want those evil pieces of shit either
wow, real own there. we should just pay the cartels to kill all the migrants

>>1291914
I grew up in Jamaica Plain, so I know Boston quite well
it's funny to me

>>1291844
>Houston,
I'm a liberal who lives in Houston and I hire these parolees to landscape my estate.
I speak Spanish and I tell all of them to tell all their fam & friends to vote Biden, and How to get a ballot even if they can't vote.
I personally have gotten at least 10k votes for good ol' Joe

>he's larping as the strawmen in his head again

>>1291983
>I personally have gotten at least 10k votes for good ol' Joe

I believe you

>>1291891
DailyMail is the pinnacle of journalism.
Quit being an anti-mailite.

>>1292188
You're lost. /news/ has always been a DailyMail board.

>>1292191
Who do you think you're fooling? There are no newfags here except you.
>>1292403
refugees


Biden's America:Another Election Defeat For Chuds

Democrat Tim Kennedy wins New York special election for House seat
Once he is sworn in to represent the state’s 26th Congressional District, the Republican majority in the chamber will temporarily fall to just one vote.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/poli<wbr>tics/2024/04/30/new-york-special-el<wbr>ection-house-kennedy/

State Sen. Tim Kennedy (D) is projected to win the special election for New York’s 26th Congressional District, according to the Associated Press.

Kennedy defeated Republican Gary Dickson, a town supervisor, in the Upstate New York district that includes the cities of Buffalo and Niagara Falls and will serve out former Democratic congressman Brian Higgins’s term, which ends in January. Higgins, who was first elected to the House in 2004, resigned his seat in February to take a job leading a performing arts center in the Democratic-leaning district.

When Kennedy is sworn in as a member of the House Democratic conference, it will temporarily shave the chamber’s Republican majority to one seat, leaving a small margin for error for party-line agenda items. House Republicans hold 217 seats and Democrats, with Kennedy, will have 213 seats, leaving vacant five seats.

A liberal Democrat who ran with the support of the Working Families Party, Kennedy served as a state legislator since 2011 and dominated the congressional race against Dickson financially. He spent more than $1 million on the race — compared with Dickson, who spent around $21,000, according to the latest campaign disclosure reports. Kennedy also is running for the seat’s full term in 2024.

>>1291872
>Democrat wins New York
They been rigging those same elections since the 1800s and still, nobody cares.

>>1291873
Just say "congratulations" and move on. It's called being a good sport.

>>1291874
Politics is not sports, retard.

>Democrat wins state level election in Democrat stronghold
>Still had to spend 47x more money then opponent to win

Thats embarassing

>>1291875
Thank you for the delicious cope :)
Republicans continue to get BTFO in the suburbs

Just looked more at this district, turns out the last time this seat was held by a Republican, Congressman Chris Lee, he resigned after soliciting a trans sex worker on craigslist. Once again, remember that Republican outrage against trans people is rooted in repression of their self-perceived sexual deviancy

>>1291897
I'M OUTRAGED!!1 HE OUGHT TO APOLOGIZE!!11

>>1291878
>Coping this hard about Republicans being loserss

>>1291951
classic russian propaganda, "we lost but you spent a lot of money making us lose"

retards retards everywhere and not a brane to think

>>1291875
>Politics is not sports
all's fair in love and war and politics(sports are symbolic war)


House Passes Bill Banning Holocaust Denial, Other Antisemitic Conspiracies

thread prediction: poltards claim they are victims for not being able to violently threaten others

Presumably this won't pass the senate, but if it does it's going to get struck down in court.

If Congress wants to change the 1st amendment there's a process for it and it isn't this. They don't have the votes for it, so they try this nonsense instead.

>>1291955
No one knows because OP didn't paste the article text

/pol/ is full of IDF(not just Idiot Dumb Fucks)

>>1291965
>No one knows because OP didn't paste the article text
I reddit and /pol/ caused this becaus the normies think that anyone who don't like to see brown babys blown to pieces and starve is anti-jewish(Zionists are anti-semites).

We pro-Palis don't hate Jews or israel, just the zionists doing the genoidin'.

But now we all get tarred with the same brush like the ''kill kikes'' scum.
And The Zionists love /pol/ and even give 4chan shekels to keep it afloat and the IDF posts there because they can say "SEE, ANTI-SEMITES everywhere11!"

>>1291955
Thread prediction: leftards are fine with destroying free speech and letting an NGO determine what constitutes free speech.

>>1291969
>think that anyone who don't like to see brown babys blown to pieces and starve is anti-jewish
Tough shit pal but the actual people determining laws and handling the budget to give free gibs to the chosen ones don't think like that. You're not allowed to criticize Israel (law being voted on), you're not allowed to boycott Israel (already a law), and if you dare think any thought against Israel you're a Nazi. You're not in a good place to bitch about subtlety when prominent lawmakers are freaking the fuck out on social media and labeling protestors as criminals.

>>1291972
Every poster ITT will be kneejerking about what they think the article says until OP actually pastes the text of the article

>>1291969
There would have been less effort to paste the article text.

>>1291977
I read the article. Congress says an NGO can govern free speech.

>>1291988
>The Alliance, an intergovernmental organization, defines antisemitism as a “certain perception of Jews, which may be expressed as hatred toward Jews” and include the calling for harm or death to Jewish people
i don't think threatening death on people is a first amendment right

>>1291990
>i don't think threatening death on people is a first amendment right
It doesn't even have anything to do with that. CHUDs didn't read the article, as usual. The bill basically updates the definition of antisemitism in the enforcement of already existing anti-discrimination laws i.e. at school, work or housing. In no way does this impact any citizen's ability to say whatever they want about Jewish people. You make a big mistake by ever assuming that right-wing shizos have ever read and critically engaged with any article they are reeee'ing over.

>>1291993
>a direct quote from the article has nothing to do with the article
do lies this shitty work where you live?

>>1291994
>The bill basically updates the definition of antisemitism in the enforcement of already existing anti-discrimination laws i.e. at school, work or housing. In no way does this impact any citizen's ability to say whatever they want about Jewish people.
Explain to me how what I just said was wrong

>>1291988
>Congress says an NGO can govern free speech.
You did not read the article

>>1291990
>i don't think threatening death on people is a first amendment right
then it doesn't need another bill passed, does it?

>>1291993
>The Alliance, an intergovernmental organization, defines antisemitism as a “certain perception of Jews, which may be expressed as hatred toward Jews” and include the calling for harm or death to Jewish people “in the name of a radical ideology or an extremist view on religion,” as well as “mendacious, dehumanizing, demonizing, or stereotypical allegations about Jews.”
Yeah... not going to affect your ability to say what you think...

>>1291955
kek, JIDF once again wanting to ban free speech

>>1291997
if it gets poltards in more trouble i'm all for it

>In his criticism of the bill, Gaetz referenced part of the definition on the use of symbols “associated with classic antisemitism,” including “claims of Jews killing Jesus.”
I guess that settles it, guys. Jews didn't really kill Jesus and you better not imply that they did.

>>1292001
>I'm sure this could never be used against me or my worldview
Yeah, I'm sure. Get those poltards!

>>1292005
I believe the story is the Romans let the Jewish leaders decide between condemning Jesus or Barabbas to be crucified, and they chose Jesus because being a blasphemer is a greater crime than being a rapist and a murderer.

But I wasn't there so I don't really know. I'm pretty sure the people who wrote these rules and laws weren't there, either.

>>1292006
that's certainly one of the pol versions

>>1292009
>Pol launched in 2011
I don't think they're the ones who came up with it, but whatever you say.

>>1292010
i know you prefer being obtuse but not everyone interprets biblical passages like you or the other poltards

>>1292011
>Everybody I don't like is a poltard!
Oh, I see.

>>1292012
you're just a single poltard, i dislike plenty of people other than you

>>1292013
>Everybody who believes the bible is a poltard and I hate them.
Yeah, I get it.

>>1292014
>believes the bible
do you believe all religious texts?

>>1292015
I've never read any religious books except the Satanic bible and that was mostly bullshit.

But I am at least aware of what the story of Jesus is.

>>1291998
>Yeah... not going to affect your ability to say what you think...
Either you didn't read the article or you're actually too low IQ to understand. The bill adopts The Alliance's definition of antisemitism in the enforcement of existing FEDERAL ANTI-DISCRIMINATION LAWS i.e. in housing, school or work. Anti-discrimination laws specifically protect people from discrimination in housing, work or schooling. This bill literally has nothing to do with regular citizens saying things about Jewish people.

>>1292018
>The bill adopts The Alliance's definition of antisemitism in the enforcement of existing FEDERAL ANTI-DISCRIMINATION LAWS i.e. in housing, school or work.
So as long as you don't say anything the Jews don't want you to say, you can keep your mortgage, job, and still go to school.

>>1292018
seems like another virtue signal bill. i don't see any material impact stemming from the bill passage tbh.

>>1292023
>So as long as you don't say anything the Jews don't want you to say, you can keep your mortgage, job, and still go to school.
That isn't how anti-discrimination laws work. They enforce the opposite way. You're actually retarded.

>>1292024
>seems like another virtue signal bill
Yeah of course it is

>>1292025
>That isn't how anti-discrimination laws work. They enforce the opposite way.
I would love for you to try to explain what this means.

>>1291953
Where does this say that it's banning Holocaust Denial?

>>1292027
>I would love for you to try to explain what this means.
Anti-discrimination laws don't take things away from you for being antisemitic. It prevents other people from taking things from you or refusing to hire or house you because you're jewish. I can't fathom the depths of sheer retardism you must be suffering from to think federal anti discrimination means the jews can take your mortgage for being antisemitic. That's one of the dumbest fucking things I've ever heard.

>>1292030
>It prevents other people from taking things from you or refusing to hire or house you because you're jewish.
I think you're confused and that was already illegal and certainly doesn't have anything to do with this bill they just passed.

>>1292032
>and certainly doesn't have anything to do with this bill they just passed.
It has everything to do with the bill they just passed. The bill they just passed updates the definition of antisemitism they use to enforce existing federal anti-discrimination laws. I don't know how to explain this any simpler.

>think you're confused and that was already illegal
Holy fucking shit. You are actually illiterate. No shit it was already illegal. This bill is not a new law. It updates the definition to an existing law.

>>1292033
>Yes Goyim, just ignore the laws being passed, they don't really mean anything! Don't even read them!
Ok rabbi.

>>1292034
the bill literally doesn't legislate speech in any capacity. you've been fear mongered again

>>1292036
>Don't believe your eyes, the party will tell you what to think
Ok, but that's exactly what the bill says.

>>1292037
paste the text of the bill where speech is being legislated.

>>1292041
I'll post it for you again sweetie.
>The Alliance, an intergovernmental organization, defines antisemitism as a “certain perception of Jews, which may be expressed as hatred toward Jews” and include the calling for harm or death to Jewish people “in the name of a radical ideology or an extremist view on religion,” as well as “mendacious, dehumanizing, demonizing, or stereotypical allegations about Jews.”

>>1292042
that's not legislation of speech. it's a defining of terms. there's nothing actionable there.

>>1291972
more democrats voted against it than republicans

>>1292043
So you wouldn't support this shitty legislation then either, right?

>>1292043
>there's nothing actionable there.
>the state labeling you an antisemite for criticizing Israel isn't actionable
Anon..

>>1292048
>oh no the state labeled you an antisemite
and? not a legislation of speech.

>>1292049
Alright you might be retarded, so let me explain something.

The government doesn't need to write a law that cracks down on you specifically to make your life a living hell. All they need to do is make a list of 'problematic' citizens and pass them along to private companies to inhibit your ability to live a normal life in the United States.

For example, US banks have a shared database of US citizens that are 'problematic'. If your name makes the list, not only will you be unable to do business with that specific bank, but the vast majority of major banks in the United States.

What this bill means is that if you criticize Israel, you're basically putting your life at risk.

>The House of Representatives passed a bipartisan bill on Wednesday aimed at targeting antisemitism on college campuses, as tensions across dozens of campuses boil over amid a spree of student-led pro-Palestinian protests and encampments.

>Key Facts

>The majority of members present from both parties approved the Antisemitism Awareness Act on Wednesday, including 187 Republicans and 133 Democrats, with 21 Republicans and 70 Democrats opposed.

>The bill, which still needs Senate approval, would require the Department of Education to adopt antisemitism definitions used by the International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance, though critics claim it would impose an overly broad set of restrictions.

>The Alliance, an intergovernmental organization, defines antisemitism as a “certain perception of Jews, which may be expressed as hatred toward Jews” and include the calling for harm or death to Jewish people “in the name of a radical ideology or an extremist view on religion,” as well as “mendacious, dehumanizing, demonizing, or stereotypical allegations about Jews.”

>The organization’s definition also extends to Holocaust denialism and accusations of Jewish people being “more loyal to Israel…than to the interests of their own nations.”

>>1292052
>Chief Critics

>Hard-right Rep. Matt Gaetz, R-Fla., who voted against the bill, called it “ridiculous” ahead of the vote Wednesday, arguing it was “written without regard for the Constitution, common sense, or even the common understanding of the meaning of words.” In his criticism of the bill, Gaetz referenced part of the definition on the use of symbols “associated with classic antisemitism,” including “claims of Jews killing Jesus.” Rep. Thomas Massie, R-Ky., also slammed the bill, saying it “has a problem beyond violating the 1st [Amendment,]
” adding it does not list the definition of antisemitism in its language.

>Tangent

>The bill’s passage comes amid heightened tensions on college campuses as groups of students lead pro-Palestinian protests critical of Israel’s invasion of the Gaza Strip, where the Hamas-led Gaza Health Ministry estimates over 34,000 people have been killed since the war broke out in October (Israel estimates Hamas killed 1,200 people in its Oct. 7 attack on Israel). While student-led protests became a fixture at colleges nationwide in the first weeks of the war, those protests heated up last month, with encampments and protests spanning from Columbia, New York University and Emerson College to the University of Texas at Austin and the University of Southern California. Those protests, like the ones last fall, sparked backlash from lawmakers on both sides of the aisle and from university donors over allegations of surging antisemitism.

>>1292051
where in the bill does it say anti-semites will be put on a list? you're just babbling in conspiracy theories now.

>>1292054
You're just mad because no one posted in your duplicate thread full of conspiracy theories
>>1291999

>>1292051
There's no list. What the bill would actually do is obligate corporations and universities (implying there's a difference) to police their employees/students' criticism of Israel. If they fail to do so, they could lose federal grants related to their business.
This is bad, but it's not what you're saying it is. If you pretend every bad thing is the worst possible thing, you're helping the supporters of the bad thing to mischaracterize their legitimate opponents.

>>1292077
>This is bad, but it's not what you're saying it is.
Anon, people like Fuentes are already on these lists. They can't use banks or fly on planes. You just never hear about them because they have virtually no media reach.

Also, this bill basically labels every Christian in America as antisemetic. You need to wake up.

>>1292034
>just ignore the laws being passed, they don't really mean anything!
You're actually mentally retarded. I specifically explained what the law meant and what it contains. You are unironically too dumb to understand.

>>1292048
How do you not know the definition of the word "action".

>>1292049
Don't concede that, anon. The state doesn't label you anything. The definition is used for the enforcement of existing anti-discrimination law, not a "label".

>>1292051
>The government doesn't need to write a law that cracks down on you specifically to make your life a living hell
There is no government crackdown in this bill. Either you didn't read it or you're actually 50 IQ.

>>1292077
>>1292078
funding can already be revoked. individuals can already be de-personed. the bill is non-material

>>1292078
Antisemitism isn't against the law and this bill wouldn't make it so. If you went to a University in America right now and said "I think all kikes should be gassed" they'd expel you, and if they didn't, they'd risk their federal funding. This bill would make it so that saying "I think Israel is committing genocide on the Palestinian people" would be treated the same way. You can go to a public square outside of a corporate or university space, right now, and say "I think we should gas all the kikes" and be legally protected by the First Amendment (so long as you didn't name anyone in particular). That isn't at risk. It's bad for reasons that have very little to do with this reactionist fear-mongering you're pushing.
Also, Nick Fuentes is a fucking retard and no one should be subjected to him on a plane or anywhere else, so good.

OP is an illiterate retarded zoomer and /news/ really needs to require full copypaste of the articles.

https://www.forbes.com/sites/brianb<wbr>ushard/2024/05/01/house-approves-an<wbr>tisemitism-bill-amid-college-uproar<wbr>-over-war-in-gaza/?sh=35ce9f544d96
May 1, 2024

House Approves Antisemitism Bill Amid College Uproar Over War In Gaza

The House of Representatives passed a bipartisan bill on Wednesday aimed at targeting antisemitism on college campuses, as tensions across dozens of campuses boil over amid a spree of student-led pro-Palestinian protests and encampments.

KEY FACTS

The majority of members present from both parties approved the Antisemitism Awareness Act on Wednesday, including 187 Republicans and 133 Democrats, with 21 Republicans and 70 Democrats opposed.

The bill, which still needs Senate approval, would require the Department of Education to adopt antisemitism definitions used by the International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance, though critics claim it would impose an overly broad set of restrictions.

The Alliance, an intergovernmental organization, defines antisemitism as a “certain perception of Jews, which may be expressed as hatred toward Jews” and include the calling for harm or death to Jewish people “in the name of a radical ideology or an extremist view on religion,” as well as “mendacious, dehumanizing, demonizing, or stereotypical allegations about Jews.”

Cont.

>>1292091

The organization’s definition also extends to Holocaust denialism and accusations of Jewish people being “more loyal to Israel… than to the interests of their own nations.”

CHIEF CRITICS

Hard-right Rep. Matt Gaetz, R-Fla., who voted against the bill, called it “ridiculous” ahead of the vote Wednesday, arguing it was “written without regard for the Constitution, common sense, or even the common understanding of the meaning of words.” In his criticism of the bill, Gaetz referenced part of the definition on the use of symbols “associated with classic antisemitism,” including “claims of Jews killing Jesus.” Rep. Thomas Massie, R-Ky., also slammed the bill, saying it “has a problem beyond violating the 1st [Amendment,]” adding it does not list the definition of antisemitism in its language.

cont.

>>1292092

TANGENT

The bill’s passage comes amid heightened tensions on college campuses as groups of students lead pro-Palestinian protests critical of Israel’s invasion of the Gaza Strip, where the Hamas-led Gaza Health Ministry estimates over 34,000 people have been killed since the war broke out in October (Israel estimates Hamas killed 1,200 people in its Oct. 7 attack on Israel). While student-led protests became a fixture at colleges nationwide in the first weeks of the war, those protests heated up last month, with encampments and protests spanning from Columbia, New York University and Emerson College to the University of Texas at Austin and the University of Southern California. Those protests, like the ones last fall, sparked backlash from lawmakers on both sides of the aisle and from university donors over allegations of surging antisemitism. At Columbia—widely considered the national focal point of the protests—school president Nemat Shafik also faces mounting calls to resign, just months after the presidents of Harvard and the University of Pennsylvania stepped down over criticism of their responses to questions during a congressional hearing on antisemitism. In response to recent protests, Columbia officials Tuesday threatened to expel students occupying Hamilton Hall, while the New York City Police Department on Tuesday night cleared a student encampment, an act that former President Donald Trump lauded as a “beautiful thing to watch.”

END

>>1292090
what's the problem? freedom of speech doesn't mean freedom from consequences. a private company can do whatever they want. deplatforming works.

i've been watching /pol/ melt down over this for the last few hours and it's wonderfully entertaining. They're acting like it's the end of the world.

>>1292058
>its a conspiracy theory that jews funded a bill to make it a crime to protest the jews

>>1292091
>The bill, which still needs Senate approval, would require the Department of Education to adopt antisemitism definitions used by the International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance

Funny hoe the House of Reps passed this bill but doesn't give a shit about blatantly racist anti-White speech at colleges that receive tax payer dollars (which is most of them)...

This is why the two party system sucks. Why are my only choices high taxes, faggots, banning guns, niggers, Ukraine slush funds or cuckservatives boomers, jews, Israel slush fund, and corporate dick sucking.

>>1292104
Correct. Protesting Jews is not a crime. That isn't what this bill does. You also have zero evidence this bill came to be because of "da joos funding" The thing you just said is 100% a conspiracy.

>>1292110
The world is so much better when you stop being a racist extremist.

>>1292111
cops are literally showing up to college campuses and dragging kids off in handcuffs for protesting the jews. there are snipers in texas to shoot people for protesting the jews. at columbia in nyc cops used a latter to raid a dorm because people were protesting the jews
>>1292113
even without racism, dems want to ban guns and raise taxes and cause inflation and cause a housing crisis and stagnate wages

>>1292114
>>1292116
chud cope is so adorable

>>1292117
what the fuck are you taking about retard? there is literally videos of nasty girl snipers at that texas collage and of the NYPD raiding columbia

>>1292121
When did you become radicalized?

>>1292124
when obongo was a bad president. also what the fuck is your whataboutism? are you denying the pics and vids of the cops and nasty girls breaking up anti jewish protests?

>>1292130
You are what happens when you get news from horrible sources

>>1292133
I get my news from NPR and I still hate dems for trying to ban guns and for being bad at running the country

>>1292095
>a private company can do whatever it wants
This is the problem. The current system of Federal funding of private institutions is a problem in general, as it gives the State power over the private sector that it wasn't supposed to have. There's nothing really stopping a university from saying "up yours, OUR students can say the nigger word all they want" to the government, but they'd lose out on a huge area of financing (and be lambasted in the media). The bill is bad in general because it gives another avenue for that to happen.
More specifically, it equates a foreign state's actions with a minority group in the US, which, ironically, is actually doing more to further the cause of real anti-semites who contend that all Jews are in on a worldwide domination plot. The bill is basically saying that an attack on Israelis is attack on all Jewish people, in other words, and this disenfranchises Jews who do not identify themselves with Israel. Also, it pushes an idea of Jewish exceptionalism that is also often employed by extremists - no other foreign State gets these protections, why should Israel? I can go to a university and criticize France or Uganda or the UAE all I want without facing administrative action, so long as I don't call them niggers or sandmonkeys while doing it. There's no reason that Israel should be any different. There's already protections against calling them kikes, which is what everyone gets, and that's plenty. To summarize: the bill, in trying to do more to protect Jews, actually does quite a lot to push narratives that are harmful to them. It fails at the one thing it is trying ro do. It's bad no matter how you look at it and I have no idea what the House was thinking when they passed it.

>>1292149
everyone who voted for it either has been paid off or they have dirt on them.

>>1292095
>a private company can do whatever they want.

Virtually every college in the U.S. gets direct tax payer money, thus they are not "private" companies.

>>1292028
Can someone answer my question?

>>1292221
>>1292028
Read the text of the bill.

>>1292221

"The bill, which still needs Senate approval, would require the Department of Education to adopt antisemitism definitions used by the International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance"

>>1292030
Anti discrimination laws work like that in practice because by going against customers and employees who have history of saying certain things, they increase their chances of an anti discrimination lawsuit bought against them being dismissed.

>>1292221
Holocaust denial is not outright illegal in the United-States. Someone engaging in it can't be used as an excuse to say, fire someone outside of at-will states. At least openly.

What this bill does is incorporate the International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance's definition of antisemitism into federal law. So, federally speaking, denying the holocaust is now considered discriminatory and antisemitic.

Broadly speaking, this means that organizations which openly receive federal benefits from the state cannot engage in holocaust denial, or any number of other things that are considered antisemitic. Including churches or private organizations.

The larger issue is that basically every single church and Christian in America is now considered antisemetic according to the state, because saying "jews killed jesus", a core teaching of the bible, also qualifies under the new definition.

the holocaust, an event so real its illegal to question it

>>1292299
because every concentration in germany was found to not be a death camp and only the camps in poland that were investigated only by the communists were found to be death camps and I don't trust communists.
plus the media always doe false depictions. like in band of brothers they have a whole holocaust liberation episode that never happened irl. easy company never found a camp full of starved jews. they showed up to a satellite camp after tanks had shown up first and by the time any Americans had shown up all the living jews had already left the camp and all that was left for the Americans to find were the bodies of jews who died of starvation and disease

>>1292302
what photos? there are no photos of the mass extermination of jews in germany and a bunch of the russian photos were found to be doctored

>>1292303
>there are no photos
Hilarious
https://www.auschwitz.org/en/galler<wbr>y/historical-pictures-and-documents<wbr>/extermination,11.html
>bunch of the russian photos were found to be doctored
By whom? Where did you hear that?

>>1292304
literally all those photos were taken by the russians. I don't believe any of them because I don't believe the russians

>>1292306
That's great but the russians weren't the only people to verify the atrocities.

>>1292306
>The picture was taken illegaly by a members of the Sonderkomando. It shows burning bodies of victims of mass extermination in Auschwitz II-Birkenau.
Not Russian

>>1292309
they literally were. all the death camps were investigated by only the communists
>>1292310
>no believe us jews
literally even worse. I don't believe anything a jew or a russian says

>>1292310
>>1292304
I have no clue why you're arguing with this guy. He's already told you he refuses to believe anything that goes against his narrative.

>>1292304
NTA, but I took a look at your pictures just now - what am I supposed to see that's so shocking and revealing? Did you have a specific picture in mind, because what you linked looks like a bunch of meaningless bullshit.

>>1292294
>What this bill does is incorporate the International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance's definition of antisemitism into federal law. So, federally speaking, denying the holocaust is now considered discriminatory and antisemitic.
That's not what it does though. Post an actual text. Not your opinion.

>>1292321
>SEC. 4. Definitions.
>For purposes of this Act, the term “definition of antisemitism”—
>(1) means the definition of antisemitism adopted on May 26, 2016, by the IHRA, of which the United States is a member, which definition has been adopted by the Department of State; and
>(2) includes the “[c]ontemporary examples of antisemitism” identified in the IHRA definition.

>>1292322
This definition of antisemitism is used to enforce anti-discrimination laws in school, housing or employment. In no way, shape or form does this bill regulate people denying the holocaust.

>>1292323
Are you seriously arguing that the INTERNATIONAL HOLOCAUST REMEMBRANCE ALLIANCE's definition of antisemitism doesn't include holocaust denial? Is that how retarded you are?
You should read the bill before commenting.

>>1292324
>Are you seriously arguing that the INTERNATIONAL HOLOCAUST REMEMBRANCE ALLIANCE's definition of antisemitism doesn't include holocaust denial?
Holocaust denial being antisemitic has nothing to do with the way this bill is enforced. This bill doesn't regulate in any way, shape or form people denying the holocaust. The only context its relevant is if it can somehow be proven in court that your holocaust denialism was related to your decision to not hire someone, not rent to someone or to exclude/harass someone at school. Also, if simply stating that you're a holocaust denier is so clearly covered in this definition then cite where it says that. Right now you're just giving me your feelings.

>Is that how retarded you are?
>You should read the bill before commenting.
All you have to do to completely BTFO me is just link in the definition or anywhere in the bill it says that questioning the holocaust is discrimination. That's your claim so prove it.

>>1292328
>This bill doesn't regulate in any way, shape or form people denying the holocaust.
It specifically limits the behavior of people who benefit from federal aid, either through employment or through schooling, by modifying definition of antisemetism and applying it to the civil rights act. You would know this if you had actually read the bill instead of shitposting.

>>1292328
>Holocaust denial being antisemitic has nothing to do with the way this bill is enforced.
It absolutely does, lying faggot.

>>1291953
so after years of calling republicans nazis, liberals are shidding and farding themselves over not being able to deny the holocaust without consequence? really jogs the noggin

I hate jews and no legislation can change that.

>>1292333
>It absolutely does, lying faggot.
It doesn't. If you had read the bill you'd know this.

>>1292332
>It specifically limits the behavior of people who benefit from federal aid,
Every law limits behavior, you moron. The contention is whether or not this limit on behavior is tantamount to regulating free speech. It isn't. You can say or express whatever views you want. That isn't what this bill regulates. The bill regulates discriminating against other people based on these beliefs. Saying "I think black people are dumb" is not regulated. Saying "I think black people are dumb so therefore I will not hire them" is. One is free speech. The other is not. I can't explain it any simpler. If you still fail to grasp this there's nothing I can do to help you.

>You would know this if you had actually read the bill instead of shitposting.
I think we both read it, you just lack the IQ to understand what it means.

>>1292358
>You can say or express whatever views you want. That isn't what this bill regulates. The bill regulates discriminating against other people based on these beliefs.
No it doesn't. It changes the definition of antisemitism. The civil rights act regulates discrimination, which is what this bill impacts.
You can't even lie correctly, jesus fuck.

>>1292322
Where does that say it's illegal to deny the Holocaust? Is your brain working?

>>1292380
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Worki<wbr>ng_definition_of_antisemitism
Shit was so retarded even the EU didn't adopt it.

>>1292389
>EU law is the same as American law
What?

>>1292414
It's the same "government" to the far right

>>1292352
A big-tittied jewess could change that

>>1292079
I'm also not a woman, and neither are you, but I don't pretend like I am one unlike what you're doing right now

>>1292096
It's going to be at this rate if the Jews are allowed to run this show full throttle

>>1292466
don't you already scream that jews run the world every possible moment you can? which is it

Schizoidberg

>>1291955
It's already illegal to violently threaten someone.

Anonymous

>>1292465
Where do you people get this shit from?

>>1291955
>Free speech gets limited again
>hur hur you just wanna threaten people
You're so fucking retarded it's not even funny.

>>1292538
Are you outraged on behalf of racists again?

>>1291990
Hatred isn't violence dumb fuck.

Jews unironically believe telling the truth about them should be illegal.

>>1292169
You mean the only people permitted to go into politics?

>Free Speech
Hate to say it, but this was never really a thing.

>>1292605
The fact that I can call both you and the government retarded in this post without getting arrested proves you wrong.

>>1292090
>If you went to a University in America right now and said "I think all kikes should be gassed" they'd expel you, and if they didn't, they'd risk their federal funding.
It would also make it illegal for any single entity that benefits from federal aid or federal programs to do be """antisemitic""", which is based on contemporary, arbitrary definitions established by a foreign company. Which literally makes certain parts of the bible illegal under those definitions.
>Also, Nick Fuentes is a fucking retard and no one should be subjected to him on a plane or anywhere else, so good.
Fuentes is also completely right, because the fucking government is going out of its way to validate every single white supremacist conspiracy theory.
Three years ago the entire notion that 'zionists controls da gubmint' would have been mocked. But now we're seeing the fucking police arresting protestors and congress passing bills that limit free speech on behalf of Israel. Like holy fucking shit, the memes were real.

>>1292634
I mostly agree with you. See:
>>1292149
The issue is thinking it's some vast conspiracy. It's not. It's just a bunch of individual, old, retarded people making stupid and out-of-touch decisions for shitty reasons. Shitty reasons probably do include pay-offs from Jewish (Israel-aligned Jewish, specifically) interest groups, but not from any central authority; these lobbying groups have competing interests and only align when it's convenient.
This is corruption and nepotism made manifest, not a grand conspiracy against white people or whatever else. The faster you (and other people like you) accept that the faster something could actually be done about it. Playing into le Hitler did nothing wrong memes doesn't do anything except get you discredited. Protest in a way that people will take seriously and you might do something useful.

>>1292030
>Anti-discrimination laws don't take things away from you for being discriminatory

That isn't entirely true, if there's a strong case of wrongful termination based on discrimination you can expect to be called up for mediation where you will be offered to pay for lost wages + suffering. If you decline then there's a chance that the case will move forward to a court where you will be personally liable.

>>1291955
A shining example of why democracy cant work

>>1292642
Protests only succeed if they are backed by the government and oligarchs in the first place. Never has there been a peaceful protest that accomplished anything the power structure didn’t want in the first place.

The appropriate move for people who want a better future is probably to just continue mocking the 2 party system and the moderate whites who still want to participate in it. Quit playing pretend with these soft losers and just constantly tell the truth to these kinds of people. In a mocking way, so that the simpler ones in the audience can follow along.

>>1291972
>be magat
>be retarded
>say easily disproven retarded shit

I guess you haven't seen that traitor and Army Ranger cosplayer Tom Cotton's faggoty letter to the ICC threatening shit he can't and won't do.
Both sides suck, but only one is profoundly retarded.


A surprise arrest and a corruption scandal hint at splits in Putin's inner circle

Link: https://www.nbcnews.com/news/world/<wbr>surprise-arrest-corruption-scandal-<wbr>putin-inner-circle-rcna149732

>A corruption scandal centered on allegations against Russia’s deputy defense minister has drawn surprise and speculation from close observers of the country’s elite.

>But it’s not the allegations against Timur Ivanov — a close ally of Defense Minister Sergei Shoigu, well known for his lavish lifestyle — that are causing a stir. Instead, many are trying to figure out what his sudden arrest means in the power games at the heart of the Kremlin.

>The arrest was announced last week by Russia’s Investigative Committee, which said Ivanov had been detained on suspicion of taking a bribe. He will remain in custody until at least June.

>During court proceedings held Wednesday, the once powerful figure appeared in a glass cage, still wearing his army uniform.

Putin's beak is dry

>>1291954
Putin don't care about bribery, just that he didn't get a cut of it

Anonymous

>>1291971
Or that he wasn't the one controlling the bribe...

He is a very insecure "leader"

>>1291954
All of Putin's henchmen take bribes. So what did he really do to piss off Putin?

>>1292068
Probably plotted to kill him. Hes sick and weak.


REPUBLICANS CAVE! ARIZONA REPUBLICAN LAWMAKERS VOTE TO REPEAL THEIR 1864 ABORTION BAN

https://apnews.com/article/arizona-<wbr>abortion-1864-ban-repeal-24578e546b<wbr>69ca087e01034bcaf4aa01

PHOENIX (AP) — The Arizona Legislature approved a repeal of a long-dormant ban on nearly all abortions Wednesday, advancing the bill to Democratic Gov. Katie Hobbs, who is expected to sign it.

Two Republicans joined with Democrats in the Senate on the 16-14 vote in favor of repealing a Civil War-era ban on abortions that the state’s highest court recently allowed to take effect. The repeal bill narrowly cleared the Arizona House last week.

Hobbs said in a statement that she looks forward to quickly signing the repeal into law.

“The devastating consequences of this archaic ban are why I’ve called for it to be repealed since day one of my administration,” she said.

“Arizona women should not have to live in a state where politicians make decisions that should be between a woman and her doctor,” Hobbs continued. “While this repeal is essential for protecting women’s lives, it is just the beginning of our fight to protect reproductive healthcare in Arizona.”

The revival of the 19th century law had put Republicans on the defensive in a battleground state for the presidential election.

“Across the country, women are living in a state of chaos and cruelty caused by Donald Trump,” Vice President Kamala Harris said in a statement on Wednesday.

“What is happening in Arizona is just the latest example,” she continued. “While Arizona Democrats have worked to clean up the devastating mess created by Trump and his extremist allies, the state’s existing ban, with no exception for rape or incest, remains in effect.”

If the repeal bill is signed, a 2022 statute banning the procedure after 15 weeks of pregnancy would become Arizona’s prevailing abortion law. Still, there would likely be a period when nearly all abortions would be outlawed, because the repeal won’t take effect until 90 days after the end of the legislative session, likely in June or July.

Arizona state Attorney General Kris Mayes called the vote “a win for freedom in our state,” but expressed concern that without an emergency clause, Arizonans would still be subject to the near total-abortion ban for some time.

“Rest assured, my office is exploring every option available to prevent this outrageous 160-year-old law from ever taking effect,” she said.

The near-total ban on abortions, which predates Arizona’s statehood, permits abortions only to save the patient’s life — and provides no exceptions for survivors of rape or incest. In a ruling last month, the Arizona Supreme Court suggested doctors could be prosecuted under the 1864 law, which says that anyone who assists in an abortion can be sentenced to two to five years in prison.

Voting on the bill stretched more than an hour, amid impassioned speeches about the motivations behand individual votes.

“This is about the Civil War-era ban that criminalizes doctors and makes virtually all abortions illegal, the ban that the people of Arizona overwhelmingly don’t want,” said Democratic state Sen. Eva Burch. “We’re here to repeal a bad law. I don’t want us honoring laws about women written during a time when women were forbidden from voting because their voices were considered inferior to men.”

There were numerous disruptions from people in Senate gallery, as Republican state Sen. Shawnna Bolick explained her vote in favor of repeal, joining with Democrats.

GOP state Sen. Jake Hoffman denounced Republican colleagues for joining with Democratic colleagues, calling it an affront to his party’s principles.

“It is disgusting that this is the state of the Republican Party today,” Hoffman said.

Advocates on both sides of the abortion issue arrived outside the Arizona Senate on Wednesday to emphasize their views. They included people affiliated with Planned Parenthood and faith-based groups opposed to abortion.

A school-age girl kneeled in prayer in front of a table holding a large statute of the Virgin Mary, while a man with a megaphone shouted at passersby to repent.

“I am expecting it will be repealed, but I am praying it won’t be,” said Karen Frigon, who was handing out brochures from the Arizona Right to Life.

Arizona is one of a handful of battleground states that will decide the next president. Former President Donald Trump, who has warned that the issue could lead to Republican losses, has avoided endorsing a national abortion ban but said he’s proud to have appointed the Supreme Court justices who allowed states to outlaw it.

The law had been blocked since the U.S. Supreme Court’s 1973 Roe v. Wade decision guaranteed the constitutional right to an abortion nationwide.

When Roe v. Wade was overturned in June 2022 though, then-Arizona Attorney General Mark Brnovich, a Republican, persuaded a state judge that the 1864 ban could again be enforced. Still, the law hasn’t actually been enforced while the case was making its way through the courts. Mayes, who succeeded Brnovich, urged the state’s high court against reviving the law.

Planned Parenthood officials vowed to continue providing abortions for the short time they are still legal and said they will reinforce networks that help patients travel out of state to places like New Mexico and California to access abortion.

Advocates are collecting signatures for a ballot measure allowing abortions until a fetus could survive outside the womb, typically around 24 weeks, with exceptions — to save the parent’s life, or to protect her physical or mental health.

Republican lawmakers, in turn, are considering putting one or more competing abortion proposals on the November ballot.

A leaked planning document outlined the approaches being considered by House Republicans, such as codifying existing abortion regulations, proposing a 14-week ban that would be “disguised as a 15-week law” because it would allow abortions until the beginning of the 15th week, and a measure that would prohibit abortions after six weeks of pregnancy, before many people know they’re pregnant.

House Republicans have not yet publicly released any such proposed ballot measures.

Too late retards, women already saw you with your mask off.

>>1291959
>A school-age girl kneeled in prayer in front of a table holding a large statute of the Virgin Mary, while a man with a megaphone shouted at passersby to repent.
Yeah that'll show 'em

>>1291961
It was women who proposed the abortion ban.

>>1291970
Animals are called females, not women.

>>1291957
didn't read the OP, but that pic is based. I hope it happens. Griswald is bullshit and shouldn't be federal

>>1292002
>Griswald is bullshit and shouldn't be federal
Fucking kek. Yeah, good luck with that.

>>1291970
Yeah 150 years ago. Times change.

>>1292055
Republicans still wish it was 1864.

>>1292022
alito and thomas both said they want to kill griswald

>>1292103
The fact that they haven't been run off the court because of how corrupt they are is kinda incredible.

>>1292105
why would the 2 best judges in the past 100 years be run off the courts? I'll start giving a shit about their "corruption" when dem judges learn how to read

>>1292107
>Whataboutism
Republicans might as well just be Russians.

>>1292108
it isn't really whataboutism. the courts have been fucking terrible since the late 1800s. its literally been bad decision after bad decision after bad decision for like 150 years.

my brane hurts does anyone have a leech?

>>1292109
>bad decision for like 150 years.
this retard wants 150 yr old laws to return.
my apologies to retards, this is mental illness religious cultism, not retardery.

>>1292109
I'm guessing you're a conservative who believes dread scott was correctly ruled.

>>1292119
once again you have no argument and you have no dick so you need to throw around insults. the courts have done retarded shit that wasn't in the constitution for like 150 years such as upholding anti first amendment laws or letting fdr throw Americans in concentration camps or Reynolds v. Sims or griswald
>>1292122
I guess you are a dem who thinks Korematsu was correctly ruled

>>1292123
>Avoiding the question
I'll take that as a yes

>>1292126
cool. so you think Korematsu was correct? Trump can unilaterally throw all hispanics in death camps like FDR did with the japs Americans?

>>1292129
>cool.
So you believe slavery is okay and the conservative final objective is repealing the 13th amendment, gotcha.

>>1292131
where did you get that from retard? the scotus can't repeal amendments to the constitution. are you retarded or just yuropean? Do you, as a democrat, believe Korematsu was correctly decided?

>>1292134
You clearly are in favor of slavery, so why would you lie?

>>1292138
so you, as a democrat, believe the president can unilaterally with an EO send an entire ethnic group of Americans to concentration camps?

>>1292141
Why do you use political parties and not ideology? it's shows the intellectual dishonesty of conservatives and how they refuse to stand for their sins.

>>1292144
the dems/liberals/leftiests/commies/mar<wbr>xists/socialists fucking love FDR and his judges who ruled in Korematsu that FDR as president can unilaterally put Americans in concentration camps due to the color of their skin

>>1292145
It's like the "Government" never includes any republicans for you

>>1292146
FDR wrote Executive Order 9066
It was an Executive order, he did it by himself. 8 or the 9 faggots sitting on the court for Korematsu were nominated by FDR, a democrat and confirmed by a majority democrat senate

>>1291957
In the spirit of equality, the only way abortion should be supported is if a paternity test is required, and if the father is able to refuse paternal obligations if the woman refuses to abort.

>>1292147
What do you think Republicans were doing at that time?

>>1292150
it was a fucking executive order. what the fuck do you think those are? it means congress didn't do shit. not that it would have mattered, dems had a 67/29 super majority in the senate and a 273 to 162 majority in the house. dems/liberals/leftiests/commies/mar<wbr>xists/socialists unilaterally threw japanese Americans into concentration camps

>>1292152
they are literally all the same thing, faggot

>>1292151
Do you think republicans protested en masse? Do you think they weren't also in favor of most of what FDR was doing?

>>1292154
>no argument
>let's accuse an American of being an ESL
I accept your concession
>>1292155
sounds like cope for the fact that dems literally put Americans in concentration camps and dems today still think it was a good thing and that everyone who made it happen was good

>>1292156
My entire point was you always completely ignore whether or not republicans were also for the things you're mad about.

>>1292157
cool, my point is the dems unilaterally threw Americans in concentration camps and I'm sure they will do it again

>>1292158
And republicans helped them do it but you will ignore that.
>>1292160
Because any time the retard I was replying to wants to blame the government for something he pretends only democrats run it.

>>1292162
the republicans literally did not help democrat president FDR to write an EO nor did they help 8 democrat judges to say the EO was good

>>1292163
They did absolutely nothing to stop it or even complain about it

>>1292174
a. CITATION NEEDED
b. dems literally unilaterally put Americans in concentration camps based on race
c. the dems still worship FDR and his judges, to this day. they love those racists for the NFA and miller and stealing people's gold

lay low, play it safe, and hope you don't get noticed

>>1292145
>FDR and his judges who ruled in Korematsu that FDR as president can unilaterally put Americans in concentration camps due to the color of their skin

Democrats, FDR, etc, didn't put Jap. in concentration camps 81 yrs ago.
Democrats didn't create Jim crow.
Nazis didn't create a society of ants.
Human nature did.
look in the mirror.
We're all capable of doing this evil or at least looking the other way.
There's a few of us that say no, and serve as a moral compass that can make the rest of us(my self included) ashamed.
something about

“The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing, the quote reads.

David Bromwich, Professor of English at Yale University:
“I don't know that anyone well known said this famous quote''.
President John F. Kennedy in a speech before Canadian lawmakers in Ottawa, on May 17, 1961.
"the thing that strikes you about this saying, on a moment's reflection, is how little sense it makes: the silence of good men isn't the only thing necessary for the triumph of evil. The persons advancing the evil, whether in command or the rank-and-file, must be strong and determined; and the lukewarm must be either cowed into submission or willing to go along because the evil seems to prosper”.

>>1292198
democrats aren't human. democrats put Americans in concentration camps based on race

>>1291957
Everything in the OP image is positive except the last one.
Slavery is jewish.

>>1292156
I thought Republicans wanted English to be the national language, yet you make basic mistakes.

This board sure is in the running for most schizophrenic

>>1292107
>i don't care about corruption because the people doing it are on my team!
people like you are the primary reason our country is in the dumpster nowadays lol

>>1292209
I didn't make a mistake, you just can't read
>>1292217
no, that would be dems being so fucking terrible at their jobs corruption is preferable. If we replace thomas and alito dems will use it as an opportunity to ban guns

>>1292285
Nah, you made a massive blunder, revealing you're an ESL.

>>1292286
nope, you literally can't read because democrats intentionally taught kids the wrong way to read to own bush

>>1292293
>More grammatical errors.
>ESL intensifies

>>1292293
>democrats intentionally taught kids the wrong way to read to own bush
There's no way you are a real person. You're doing a bit right now.

>>1292327
yeah, you clearly aren't American
>>1292329
its literally fucking well documented they did this. W wanted schools to teach phonics, so dems intentionally misused NCLB money on a bunk reading system that doesn't teach phonics. Its why zoomer's can't read
https://features.apmreports.org/sol<wbr>d-a-story/

>>1292330
>its literally fucking well documented they did this. W wanted schools to teach phonics, so dems intentionally misused NCLB money on a bunk reading system that doesn't teach phonics. Its why zoomer's can't read
How did you get like this?

>>1292331
by reading publicly available news reports and peer reviewed papers. you are a bot and have no argument so you are going back to your JIDF script

>>1292330
>yeah
Glad you admit you're a third worlder pretending to be an American.

>>1292359
unlike you and obongo, I am an American citizen

>>1292369
I honestly don't think he's racist. He's too schizophrenic to form the coherent thought necessary to build a worldview. He literally comes here to post the voices in his head.

>>1292372
He comes here to smear his shit all over the board because the voices in his head told him communist UN/WEF transjews post here.

2 sides of the same coin is still 1 coin

>>1292369
>He's a racist too.
I like intelligent schizoid racists.
They are diametrically juxtaposed to my intelligent schizoid wokism.

>>1292421
>He comes here to smear his shit all over the board because the voices in his head told him communist UN/WEF transjews post here.

I come here to smear my shit all over the board because the voices in my head tell me this board is a bridge that I should live under and challenge anyone who walks across it whom I deem to be an idiot, especially intelligent schizoid bigots (racist is outdated term as there is only the human race, and in this race, blacks have a metaphorical socio-economic 10 kilo handicap weight attached by whites)

>>1292430
Yes but you're more of a reactionary shitflinger than a proactive one.

>>1291957
>That pic
Man, killing babies is linked to being gay? The fucking mental gymnastics is astounding.

>>1292595
>Man, killing babies is linked to being gay?
Yes. Conservatives, generally speaking, do not support abortion or the homosexual lifestyle. Its a very easy connection.

>>1292600
When did they become the morality police?


Jewish Democrats Hakeem Jefferies and Nadler pass bill banning protest of jews at school/colleges

https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/hou<wbr>se-vote-gop-antisemitism-bill-amid-<wbr>college-unrest/story?id=109830325<br>once again, jews are shown to control DC, the police and colleges

>>1291999
I thought Mike Johnson was the house speaker?

>>1292038
yeah but Jefferies is supposed to be a pro-hamas lefty. Idk about Nadler, he definitely looks like a zionist goblin.

>>1291999
>trying to pin this on the democrats
It's a Republican bill, the Left is galvanizing behind Palestine as a reaction to the Right's support of Israel because all political thought has to be oppositional in anno domini 2024.

>>1292038
and?
>>1292040
>>1292050
it was 320-91, it was bipartisan because the jews control the government

it aint hypocrisy if we dont use Zyklon B

The Zionists learned well from their nazi genociders

>>1292171
/news/flash, the government of isr*el is completely controlled by the jews

>>1291999
Why does no one post the article on this bill? What are you hiding?

>>1292305
There is one stubborn /pol/tard here who hates the board and all of its traditions