Donald Trump's campaign of terror

Anonymous

Donald Trump continues his campaign of terror against the forces of good, Donald Trump threatens to remove newscasters if he's re-eleted
https://www.rawstory.com/msnbc-nico<wbr>lle-wallace-trump?utm_source=x.com&<wbr>utm_campaign=social
Nicolle Wallace spurs uproar over dire warning: Trump could force me off air if reelected
MSNBC's Nicolle Wallace made a startling prediction on Monday: should former President Donald Trump be voted back into the Oval Office, she and other journalists could find themselves forced out of their jobs.

Wallace's name quickly became a trend on the social media platform X as Americans on both sides of the aisle digested this disturbing take.
The MSNBC host made this remark while discussing the recent White House Correspondents' Dinner and a comment from President Joe Biden.

"[Trump] said he wants to be a dictator on day one," Biden told the nation. "He tells supporters he is their revenge and retribution. When in God's name have you ever heard another president say something like that? And he promised a 'bloodbath' when he loses again. We have to take this seriously."

Biden urged his viewers not to discount Trump's comments as mere campaign trail rhetoric.

"Eight years ago we could have written it off as just Trump talk," Biden said. "But no longer. Not after January 6th."

Biden then toasted the free press, and days later, Wallace shared her views.

"I've seen that toast a bunch of times, but it landed very differently this year," said Wallace. "Because depending on what happens in November, seven months from right now, this time next year, I might not be sitting here. There might not be a White House Correspondents' Dinner or free press. Will our democracy fall apart immediately without it? The real threat looms larger. A candidate with outward disdain, not just for a free press, but for all of our freedoms, and for the rule of law itself."

Wallace's remarks prompted a strong reaction on social media.

Many of the reactions came from MAGA supporters who were enraged that Wallace would suggest Trump is a threat to American freedom.

"Nicolle Wallace has lost her mind," posted Brigitte Gabriel, the head of the anti-Muslim hate group ACT For America. "Don’t get me too excited," said pro-Trump influencer Collin Rugg.

Other commenters, though, said they believe the threat Trump poses to the media is real.

"MSNBC host @NicolleDWallace makes the point I wish every journalist could understand: if Trump wins, she might not even be on the air," wrote political strategist Rachel Bitecofer. "It took the Nazis just 10 months to enact The Editor’s Law, which required Nazi permission to publish anything."

>>1291353
Weird title considering Democrack-babies are running around spreading misinformation horror stories to appeal to their base of childless over 30 dykes.

>>1291358
Where do you people get this shit from?

>>1291359
This article is actually a great source of where I'm getting it.
Biden giving the voters an "If Trump is elected..." horror story along with Nicolle Wallace giving her "If Trump is elected..." horror story.
How can you live in this much fear?

my 2nd pair of panties today...tRump did this

>>1291362
i pissed my panties even thinking about ''tRump the Terrible I''

>>1291358
Typical Republican misinformation

>>1291353
>oh no the monster I helped create is now eating me!!!
Fuck Nicole Wallace, and all the other "regretful" republicans on MSNBC

>>1291363
>i pissed my panties even thinking about ''tRump the Terrible I'
Wait til you see tRump the Terrible II

>>1291391
We're already seeing him, which is why he's going to lose again.

>>1291362
>How could you be afraid of things that have 100% actually happened and the person who did those things says he is gonna do it again???
A real head scratcher, anon.

>>1291710
Trump didn't actually say this tho
This is MSNBC fearporn inventing content on democrats favorite fetish

>>1291712
>Trump didn't actually say this tho
If you're 6 years old and you can only understand the EXPLICIT words people say and not the clear implications of what they're saying, sure.

>This is MSNBC fearporn inventing content on democrats favorite fetish
Consider the possibility that the drama farm only continues because Trump is an endless drama pig that literally cannot stop doing and saying unhinged shit.

>>1291713
>If you're 6 years old and you can only understand the EXPLICIT words people say and not the clear implications of what they're saying
So you're admitting he didn't say what you're claiming he said, and are baselessly asserting your own biased interpretation as fact. Nice.

>Consider the possibility that the drama farm only continues because the MSM cares more about lying for profit than it does telling you anything resembling the truth.
FTFY


Hunter to sue Fox news for Ukrainegate and revenge porn

the hunter gets captured by the game

Lawyers for Hunter Biden plan to sue Fox News “imminently,” according to a letter sent to the network and obtained by NBC News.

The letter, dated April 23, puts the Fox News Channel and Fox News Digital on notice for litigation claims arising from the network’s alleged “conspiracy and subsequent actions to defame Mr. Biden and paint him in a false light, the unlicensed commercial exploitation of his image, name, and likeness, and the unlawful publication of hacked intimate images of him.”

Biden has hired attorney Mark Geragos and his firm to represent him in the Fox litigation efforts. The letter is the second outreach to Fox this month.

 Fox News agreed to pay $800 million to Dominion Voting Systems to settle defamation claims related to Fox’s airing of election fraud claims in the 2020 election. Fox News also agreed to a $12 million settlement with a former employee who alleged she was pressured to provide misleading information as part of the Dominion case.

Fox is currently facing a $2.7 billion lawsuit brought by Smartmatic, another voting system company that was the focus of Fox News coverage, as well as suits brought by shareholders against directors of the company for allowing the channel to air the allegations during its 2020 election coverage.

https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/rc<wbr>na149707

https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/<wbr>news/2983316/hunter-biden-preparing<wbr>-to-sue-fox-news/

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W-v<wbr>NHRExA7E

>>1291396
The effort to sue took on new importance with the revelations that the bribery allegations cited on air originated from the FBI informant Alexander Smirnov, who was indicted by special counsel David Weiss in February.

In a statement, Geragos said: “For the last five years, Fox News has relentlessly attacked Hunter Biden and made him a caricature in order to boost ratings and for its financial gain. The recent indictment of FBI informant Smirnov has exposed the conspiracy of disinformation that has been fueled by Fox, enabled by their paid agents and monetized by the Fox enterprise. We plan on holding them accountable.”

Hunter Biden has been a focus of Fox News coverage for the last several years. A review of network transcripts by the group Media Matters cites at least 13,440 mentions of Hunter Biden since January 2023. Biden’s legal team believes the number of mentions over many years makes the potential case as significant if not more so than the Dominion case, according to sources familiar with the legal strategy.

The Biden letter specifically cites Fox’s advancement of bribery allegations by Smirnov, who was indicted in February on charges of making false statements about the Bidens to the FBI. “Smirnov and the post indictment revelations basically closed the loop on the conspiracy,” Geragos told NBC News.

The letter alleges that Fox News knew that the bribery allegations were unverified at the time but continued to report that the source was “highly credible,” and demands corrections and retractions — including on-air statements by television hosts “including Sean Hannity, Jesse Watters, and Maria Bartiromo, to inform their viewers on air that they have been sharing a debunked allegation from a source who has been federally indicted.”

>>1291397
The letter also alleges that Fox’s airing of “intimate images” belonging to Hunter Biden that his lawyers claim were “hacked, stolen, and/or manipulated” violates Biden’s civil rights as well as copyright law. Much of the letter is focused on a six-part “mock trial” titled “The Trial of Hunter Biden” that aired in October 2021, described by Fox as what a trial might look like if Biden was charged with Foreign Agents Registration Act or bribery charges — neither of which Biden has been charged with. “While using certain true information, the series intentionally manipulates the facts, distorts the truth, narrates happenings out of context, and invents dialogue intended to entertain. Thus, the viewer of the series cannot decipher what is fact and what is fiction,” the letter says. The letter demands that the series be removed from all streaming services.

Anonymous

huh, i was told that the laptop wasn't real and it was all conspiracies though?

>>1291399
The dick pics were real obviously, and republitards couldn't stop slobering over them

the hunter gets captured by the hunter

>>1291400
>republitards couldn't stop slobering over th
MTG had her vagina juices on the pix of Hunter that she showed in congress.
Hunter should look into suing her.

Anonymous

>>1291400
How about the underage hookers he was fuckin?

>>1291396
>take a bunch of photos of yourself committing crimes including smoking crack and having an illegal firearm
>post photos to the internet
>get mad when the news covers it
do bidens really?

>>1291404
>How about the underage hookers he was fuckin?
There's no evidence any of them were underage, but if you recognize the hookers and know their ages, maybe tell the FBI that. I'm sure they'll be curious where you got that info.

>>1291405
Pretty sure this lawsuit is about the whole accusing him of being involved in an international conspiracy to corrupt the US government thing and then refusing to retract the story when it turned out all their sources were full of shit, not about the cool crimes.

>>1291407
>Pretty sure this lawsuit is about the whole accusing him of being involved in an international conspiracy to corrupt the US government thing and then refusing to retract the story when it turned out all their sources were full of shit, not about the cool crimes.
See:
>The letter also alleges that Fox’s airing of “intimate images” belonging to Hunter Biden... violates Biden’s civil rights as well as copyright law

>>1291409
>copyright law
I'm confused on how copyright law applies to something that I'm sure is not copyrighted.

>>1291412
and copyright of something that intelligence officials insist never existed in the first place. truly awe inspiring stuff here

>>1291413
You shouldn't lie while accusing others of lying

>>1291413
Even if it was copyrighted (which I'm sure it isn't?) then surely fair use would apply.
>Under the fair use doctrine of the U.S. copyright statute, it is permissible to use limited portions of a work including quotes, for purposes such as commentary, criticism, news reporting, and scholarly reports.
I understand lawyers can make all sorts of pathetic arguments that won't hold up in court, but this seems like a pretty easy slam dunk.

>“For the last five years, Fox News has relentlessly attacked Hunter Biden and made him a caricature in order to boost ratings and for its financial gain,”
Isn't that *literally* what every news network has done with trump?

I don't see this going anywhere

>>1291412
>I'm confused on how copyright law applies to something that I'm sure is not copyrighted.
You're confusing copyright and registered copyright.
>In all countries where the Berne Convention standards apply, copyright is automatic, and need not be obtained through official registration with any government office. Once an idea has been reduced to tangible form, for example by securing it in a fixed medium (such as a drawing, sheet music, photograph, a videotape, or a computer file), the copyright holder is entitled to enforce their exclusive rights.

>>1291418
>Isn't that *literally* what every news network has done with trump?
No. Trump's just that stupid and corrupt. An accurate portrait is definitionally not a caricature, no matter how awful you look in it.

Maliciously lying about someone isn't legal, as Trump himself found out recently.

>>1291425
>Bernie Convention standards
Oh well, how about that?
>Author's rights under the Berne Convention must be automatic; it is prohibited to require formal registration. However, when the United States joined the convention on 1 March 1989,[6] it continued to make statutory damages and attorney's fees only available for registered works.
Ok, well wait a minute, there's a problem...

>>1291426
>No. Trump's just that stupid and corrupt.
So yes, because using your tax payer funded salary to participate in human trafficking of prostitutes and smoking crack is both stupid and corrupt. Gotcha.

>An accurate portrait is definitionally not a caricature
Given that the reporting on Hunter has been accurate, despite leftists best attempt to obfuscate the issue and outright lie about his crimes, he's hardly been made into a caricature. No more so than he's made one of himself, at the least.

>Maliciously lying about someone isn't legal, as Trump himself found out recently.
Good thing Fox hasn't been lying about Hunter at all. In-fact the only lies about Hunter come from the libshit pissbabies who still cry about his laptop being Russian disinfo, despite it being confirmed by the multiple law enforcement agencies charging Hunter with crimes.

>>1291427
You can register a copyright after the fact, fucking idiot.
>In the US, registering after an infringement only enables one to receive actual damages and lost profits.
Literally all registering in advance does is ensure you'll have your attorney's fees covered if you win a copyright case.

>>1291428
>because using your tax payer funded salary to participate in human trafficking
Nobody said anything about Texas or Florida's governors.

>Given that the reporting on Hunter has been accurate
Lol

>Good thing Fox hasn't been lying about Hunter at all
Lmao even

>>1291429
>You can register a copyright after the fact, fucking idiot.
lol what are you talking about man
do you think Hunter is going to apply for a copyright on the videos he took of himself smoking crack and fucking whores?

Is that really what you're saying here? Because that's fucking gold bro.

>>1291430
>Nobody said anything about Texas or Florida's governors.
Correct, we're talking about Hunter Biden paying for prostitutes to be trafficking for his use.

>>Given that the reporting on Hunter has been accurate
>Lol
I'm glad you have no argument and you agree. Feel free to prove otherwise.

>>Good thing Fox hasn't been lying about Hunter at all
>Lmao even
Again, feel free to prove otherwise. Note: crying about the laptop being fake is an automatic concession on your point, it's documented as real and you don't get to lie about it anymore.

>>1291431
>he's gonna start sucking dick to get the last word again
You greedy slut

>>1291399
51 CIA intelligence officials signed a letter saying it was Russian disinformation.

Republicans keenly noted that the laptop contained CSAM of Hunter banging his underaged niece, which democrats tried to cover up.

"NOBODY IS ABOVE THE LAW!"

>>1291434
>51 CIA agents offered their opinion, which was wrong
Cool. Laptop still confirmed as real though.

>The laptop was real: DOJ confirms in new court filing it indeed belonged to Hunter Biden
https://abc3340.com/news/nation-wor<wbr>ld/the-laptop-was-real-doj-confirms<wbr>-in-new-court-filing-it-indeed-belo<wbr>nged-to-hunter-biden-capitol-hill-d<wbr>eposition-investigation-business-de<wbr>als-james-comer-house-oversight-com<wbr>mittee-computer-repair-shop-new-yor<wbr>k-post-article-special-counsel-davi<wbr>d-weissi

Again, this is a settled topic.

>>1291429
Oh man...
>The Effective Date of copyright registration is important to know because without it (17 USC §411(a) of the Copyright Act), a court does not have jurisdiction to hear a copyright infringement case. In Fourth Estate Public Benefit Corp. v Wall-Street.Com, the Supreme Court unanimously ruled that registration of a work exists when the Copyright Office registers the copyright in the work, not when an applicant submits an application. While it is great to have clarity, this answer does not solve the dilemma of a copyright owner wanting to request the special relief of statutory damages and attorney fees (17 USC §504(c)) against an infringer because such remedies are available only if registration precedes the infringement.
What does "precedes" mean again?

>>1291429
Why did you run away, faggot? I was having fun. =(

>>1291436
Definitely the guy who takes selfies of himself smoking crack would've copywritten said selfies before forgetting he left them on his laptop. Bulletproof legal case here

>>1291439
It gets so quiet when the shills scatter.

>>1291439
Pretty much this lol the copyright argument is laughable he's going to get laughed out of court

>>1291434
>>1291435
Imagine being this gullible

>>1291440
No one wants to engage with your mental illness. Why would they? In your head you're always going to be right no matter how wrong you really are.

>>1291432
Yes. He will. It costs him virtually nothing and lets him pursue an easy lawsuit. Why wouldn't he? It's not like the pics go away if he doesn't.

>>1291436
You're just repeating what I said, dipshit.

>>1291437
Some of us have lives, dumb bitch. Can't just sit around taking cock all day.

>>1291473
I think you're very confused, dumbass. Maybe copyright works that way in your eurotrash country, but it doesn't work that way in the US. I even linked you the criminal code that clarifies that you can't sue someone for copyright infringement if you haven't copyrighted the material before the "infringement" occurred.

Just take your meds.

ITT kneejerking faggots don't know the difference between a laptop and an external hard drive

>>1291476
Imagine moving the goalpost all the way from
>It's Russian disinformation
to
> ackshually it was an external hard drive not a laptop
And not realizing you look retarded to anyone paying attention

>>1291482
I can understand how you would want to blame you being so wrong and not understanding the facts of the case on me "moving the goalposts" when you apparently never knew where the goalposts originally were in the first place or how many goalposts there were.

>>1291476
Both contained hunters data.
The laptop itself was seized by the FBI in 2016
Isaac's personal hard drive contained a copy of the data which he distributed to various figures

>>1291491
>Both contained hunters data.
No they didn't.

>>1291493
Hunter seems to think they did, so I don't really care what you think on the matter, you're kind of just stupid

russia really doesn't want to let this talking point go

>>1291502
Are you implying that Hunter is actually claiming he owns the copyright to Russian disinformation?
Of so then bigly story!

>>1291504
When you people are retards, you are very easy to call out.

The whole point of this article is Hunter is suing for people distributing the contemt found on his laptop.

Idk how you can even argue that it's not Hunter's data giving he's literally suing everybody he can over distributing it, even the laptop repairman he forgot to pay because he was so high on crack cocaine

>>1291507
>>1291510
How much longer are you going to keep perpetuating Rudy Guiliani's conspiracy theory? Do you not realize millions of people are laughing at you people?

>>1291512
As long as Comer and Grassley and Jim "sleeveless" Jordan keep telling the sheep it's real then they will believe it.

>>1291493
>Hunter is claiming he owns a copyright over a bunch of stuff he has nothing to do with
So I guess it'll be thrown out of court even quicker than I had thought

>>1291515
Either way you'll never know because you learn everything you know about the case from right wing twitter accounts and rumble videos.

>>1291512
>He's gonna sue Fox News for copyright violations on the videos he recorded of himself smoking crack and fucking underage whores
>Also, none of it really happened
This is what pure cognitive dissonance looks like.

>>1291512
Your not very good at gas lighting, specially when you're in an article where the guy in question is saying it's his data and he's suing people for distributing it

>>1291517
This.
This retard shill we are talking to is one of the most retarded people on this board

>>1291517
When none of the things you claim are going to happen in your crazy headcanon actually happen I'll be here to laugh at you.

>>1291518
That's funny because you're actually the one trying to spread a 5 year old debunked conspiracy theory out of lack of anything else to run a presidential campaign on.

>>1291520
Bro just shut up already, you're probably the only person left who thinks this is all fake, the dude is literally suing everyone over releasing his data, every post you say otherwise just makes you sound more retarded

>>1291523
is the screen literally covered in cum?

>>1291523
>Copy of what's believed to be Hunter Biden's laptop data turned over by repair shop to FBI showed no tampering, analysis says
>By Catherine Herridge, Graham Kates
>November 21, 2022 / 6:14 PM EST / CBS News
>Data from a laptop that the lawyer for a Delaware computer repair shop owner says was left by Hunter Biden in 2019 – and which the shop owner later provided to the FBI under subpoena – shows no evidence of tampering or fabrication, according to an independent review commissioned by CBS News.
Oomph.
That's gonna be a big L for Libbot Shillmeister

>>1291525
Not really considering Bill Barr had all the time in the world to file charges in 2019-2020 and didn't because there isn't anything incriminating on there. But of course you already knew that and keep perpetuating the conspiracy theory because you've got nothing else.

>>1291521
The truth isn't going away no matter how much you whine and scream about how much it hurts you.

>Biden sued Giuliani and several limited liability companies he owns, along with Giuliani’s attorney Robert Costello and 10 unnamed individuals, accusing them of violating the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act, California Computer Data Access and Fraud Act and rules against unfair business practices.

>The lawsuit takes issue with Giuliani and Costello’s possession of Biden’s “laptop”—which the lawsuit notes is not an actual laptop, but rather “an ‘external drive’ that Defendants were told contained hundreds of gigabytes of Plaintiff’s personal data”—which the defendants have allegedly illegally hacked and tampered with, making “further alterations and damage to the data.”

>>1291529
>The lawsuit takes issue with Giuliani and Costello’s possession of Biden’s “laptop”—which the lawsuit notes is not an actual laptop, but rather “an ‘external drive’ that Defendants were told contained hundreds of gigabytes of Plaintiff’s personal data”
100% correct
The laptop was turned over to the FBI in 2016.
The hard drive was a copy of the laptop data retained by John Mac isaac, later turned over to other individuals.

The original copy of data on the hard drive has been validated by Independent News organizations, see above.

The actual laptop itself as far as I know the FBI has held on to and they haven't released any public statements about it except for the fact that they seized it in 2016

>>1291530
yet he's suing giuliani for tampering, among other illegalities

>>1291529
>Computer Fraud and Abuse Act, California Computer Data Access and Fraud Act and rules against unfair business practices.
>>1291529
>which the defendants have allegedly illegally hacked and tampered with, making “further alterations and damage to the data.”
Oh wow this is great, so he's implying it's his own personal data that Giuliani "altered" or "damaged" after they received it.

Giuliani, or somebody he gave it to did in fact do this, because there were some files that had been altered in some of the copies of the hard drive data that was floating around after the fact.

The original hard drive data, which has still did this day been retained by John Mac isaac, has been unaltered according to independent investigations, once again see the link above

>>1291532
>he's suing giuliani for tampering
Tampering with Russian disinformation?
Or tampering with hunters own personal data?

>>1291399
the laptop that rudy found (credible), that hunter shipped many states over because the family of the vice president of the united states doesnt have an IT guy (credible).

does anyone even know what kind of laptop it is or what fucking color it is? has anyone even physically seen this thing? we're coming up on 5 years of hearing about this thing. it all seems very fake and gay.

>>1291538
Imagine being so indoctrinated you think Rudy Guiliani's version of events is real.

>>1291540
they get paid to do so, i believe

Oh ffs he's not just acting retarded but now he's samefagging

>>1291541
I blame Donald J. Trump for making people stupider.

>>1291538
>>1291523
https://www.cbsnews.com/news/hunter<wbr>-biden-laptop-data-analysis/
>>1291524
Yes, I already commented on it, the picture is right there. It looks like the screen is covered in some sort of cum-like substance.

>>1291545
You already know the laptop wasn't his data, you're just playing dumb now.

>>1291543
you know this is an anonymous website, right dummy?

>>1291551
Don't bother, he thinks everyone to the left of Steve Bannon is the same poster

>>1291550
Ah, so hunter is accusing Giuliani of hacking Russian disinformation!
What a twist! The plot thickens!

>>1291540
>>1291541
>>1291552
>>1291551
Really, I know your extremely mentally retarded and all but if your going to samefag so fkn much and want people to believe you, wait longer than the 60 timeout every time you want to reply to yourself

You really are retarded, samefag-kun

>>1291553
Direct quote from the article:
>conspiracy and subsequent actions to defame Mr. Biden and paint him in a false light,
This is what you are still trying to perpetuate, and again I can't stress enough that the only reason this debunked bullshit keeps coming up is lack of anything else for the GOP to run on in this election year.

>>1291555
you don't even know how to use contractions, retard. why would anyone listen to you

>>1291555
>the poster who thinks Rudy Guiliani is trustworthy is calling other people retarded
top kek

>>1291556
The fact your conspiracy theory needs a new twist every time someone points why it's hunters data and he's suing people for releasing it really just makes you look stupid.

>>1291559
I haven't mentioned him once, and I even said he altered the data given to him.

But damn son, you been samefagging this thread and acting like a retard the whole time

You really are a sad sad little person

>>1291561
i wonder when the last time was you went a day without lying

>>1291561
Are the samefags in the room now?

It's amazing to me that all mainstream news and sources, even hunter himself has admitted the data belongs to hunter, yet somehow, there is someone who is actually mentally ill enough on this board to argue otherwise

>>1291565
weird you'd believe giuliani when he's such an egregious liar that his law license was suspended

>>1291540
imagine thinking i thought he was. wew.

>>1291548
>https://www.cbsnews.com/news/hunte<wbr>r-biden-laptop-data-analysis/

>what's believed to be
>analysis says
wew

>>1291579
Does it have a picture of the laptop or not? Because that's why I linked it, faggot.

>>1291576
>Rudy said so I believe it, and that's final
Ok boomer

>>1291441
You wish I was projecting those dick pics you gay faggot

>>1291402
>MTG had her vagina juices on the pix of Hunter that she showed in congress.

BLEEECH!!1

>Hunter should look into suing her.
 She dont got a lot, but that's even better to hurt her

>>1291405
>>post photos to the internet
Hunter didn't post them you moron.
They were stolen from his laptop, that's why it's called revenge porn

>>1291581
"what is believed to be" does not mean here it definitely is.

>>1291582
i dont believe anything he says. your reading comprehension is poor.

>>1291601
Sure, idk what your conspiracy theory is anon, it was filled with his data and he's suing that his data was leaked.

IDC that you think Rudy Giuliani hacked a non existent laptop and uploaded perfect clones of gigabytes of actual hunter Biden data onto this non existent laptop or whatever the fuck your crazy cope is

>>1291639
those dick pics were copyright protected, chud. drumpf will pay for this

>>1291649
It's really weird how you people have conflated
>the unlicensed commercial exploitation of his image,
with copyright violations

>>1291649
>those dick pics were copyright protected
this still makes me laugh every time I think about it

>>1291652
chud headcanon makes you laugh?

https://www.thedailybeast.com/fox-n<wbr>ews-quietly-deletes-hunter-biden-mo<wbr>ck-trial-special-following-lawsuit-<wbr>threat<br>Fox News deleting their smear campaign since Hunter has them dead to rights for a defamation suit

>>1291665
>Defamation suit based on things he did
Good luck, Penis Biden.

>>1291652
All creative works made by humans are copyright protected by default.

>>1291669
>based on things he did
How'd that work out with Dominion?

You thinking someone did something and someone actually doing the thing aren't the same thing for redhats (cultists)

>>1291672
This is eurotrash nonsense that literally doesn't apply to the US, at all.

>>1291672
The lawsuit was talking about 'his likeness' not actual photos, but don't let that get in the way of a good chud false narrative.

>>1291672
Fair use is no longer a thing?

>>1291677
Since when are news agencies not able to report on the likeness of the current president's son and/or his activities?

Hunters probably just sour hes already been sued himself by John Isaac for defamation.

At this point he knows he owes a few million to Isaac and he's just trying to find a way to make the money that doesn't include foreign grifting and corruption rackets with his dad

>>1291679
For the purpose of defamation? Never. If FOX can defend that they truly believed the claims they were making about him to be true they'll win their case. If they can't, they won't.

>>1291711
the onus is on biden to prove that something defamatory was said at all. i sincerely doubt anyone could even demonstrate as much.

>>1291715
>the onus is on biden to prove that something defamatory was said at all
Well, not particularly. He has to prove damages, firstly, and then he has to prove intent. FOX isn't going to argue they didn't say things that reflected negatively on Biden. That's a given. They're going to argue that they said those things in good faith, believing that they were true. Its only defamation if they knowingly said those things knowing that they knew were false.

>i sincerely doubt anyone could even demonstrate as much.
People do all of the time, anon. Intent is the foundation of like 85% of our entire criminal code. Intent is only irrelevant in statutory offenses.

>>1291715
Fox lost their last their defamation case, so I don't think it's very likely they'd win this one either.

>>1291718
>>1291719
what false things did fox say about hunter biden?

>>1291724
>what false things did fox say about hunter biden?
I have no clue what Biden is alleging was false. I haven't read over the case. I'm not arguing one way or the other. I'm just explaining what defamation is and what the burden of evidence is.

>>1291718
He doesn't have to prove they knew it was false. The
>with reckless disregard of whether it was false or not
standard will be a slam dunk, especially with discovery.

Frankly more people should sue Fox. We know they aren't careful on internal comms, and they're biased as shit.

>>1291728
Could you tell me what I just said that was incorrect?

>>1291676
No, it isn't, dipshit

>>1291676
>Fair use is no longer a thing?
Why would fair use apply to literally stolen photos that everyone knew and admitted were stolen?

Also fair use doesn't mean something wasn't copyrighted. That's public domain.

>>1291730
Not him but you're a retard who can't read.
>Much of the letter is focused on a six-part “mock trial” titled “The Trial of Hunter Biden” that aired in October 2021, described by Fox as what a trial might look like if Biden was charged with Foreign Agents Registration Act or bribery charges — neither of which Biden has been charged with. “While using certain true information, the series intentionally manipulates the facts, distorts the truth, narrates happenings out of context, and invents dialogue intended to entertain. Thus, the viewer of the series cannot decipher what is fact and what is fiction,” the letter says. The letter demands that the series be removed from all streaming services.
Fox removed the content today according to >>1291665

>>1291733
>Not him but you're a retard who can't read.
Ironic, seeing as how literally 3 posts ago I explicitly said that I hadn't read over the case nor do I know what specific claims Biden is using as the basis for his lawsuit. My post was specifically talking about the legal parameters of defamation and what both sides had to prove, not the evidentiary accuracy of any claims being made. If you had bothered to read the previous posts you may have avoided this embarrassing shitpost.

>>1291732
I can see you are woefully ignorant of US law. I already even linked it in the thread. Nor do you seem to have any clue what "fair use" means. You can continue being an ignorant foreigner faggot though, and nobody can stop you.

>>1291734
It isn't ironic at all, you're simply a dumbass who can't be bothered to read the op article.

>>1291736
>It isn't ironic at all
Well, it is. You're criticizing me for not knowing a thing that I freely admitted not knowing at the beginning of my post. You call me a retard who can't read yet you unironically responded to me without reading what I said. This is the definition of irony.

>you're simply a dumbass who can't be bothered to read the op article
Well, good thing nothing I said had anything to do with the evidentiary claims cited in the article. Its almost like if you had read and processed what I said you would've known this.

>>1291735
>Nor do you seem to have any clue what "fair use" means

>Fair use gives users the right to use
>>copyrighted
>material without permission under certain circumstances
>https://copyright.psu.edu/copyrigh<wbr>t-basics/fair-use/

Fuck off Europoor

>>1291735
>>1291742
Also, this shit fails like every fair use standard except arguably educational and that's only if you take the matter to be of public interest, which it's not.

Using unpublished works obtained in bad faith in their entirety is a fucking nono.

>>1291639
there is a thing called a cloud server you know. this physical laptop is no where to be seen for YEARS now.

the story is make up by rudy. it's fake and gay.

>>1291744
>It's all fake!
>Giuliani hacked an imaginary laptop and put 128 GB of hunters data on it!
>There is no laptop!
>The pictures of it in the news are fake!
>The FBI made it all up!
Lmao you are legit retarded anon

>>1291744
So John Mac Isaac hacked the apple cloud and stole hunters data? And got the local files off his laptop too!?
Holy smokes anon, you better give MSNBC a tip about your conspiracy theory!

>>1291744
>According to reports on January 16, 2024, new filings by the U.S. Department of Justice's special counsel, headed by David C. Weiss, appear to be the first public confirmation of the laptop's authenticity by the DOJ. The filings refer to the laptop connected to Hunter Biden stating, “the defendant’s Apple MacBook Pro, which he had left at a computer store.”[68]
Even the DOJ acknowledges the laptop factually belonged to Biden

Dark Hunter Returns. There will be blood.

>>1291744
>people still claiming the laptop wasn't real and that it was an external HDD

https://abc3340.com/news/nation-wor<wbr>ld/the-laptop-was-real-doj-confirms<wbr>-in-new-court-filing-it-indeed-belo<wbr>nged-to-hunter-biden-capitol-hill-d<wbr>eposition-investigation-business-de<wbr>als-james-comer-house-oversight-com<wbr>mittee-computer-repair-shop-new-yor<wbr>k-post-article-special-counsel-davi<wbr>d-weissi

>But the Department of Justice now, for the first time, has confirmed the laptop was Hunter's, an Apple MacBook Pro that he had left at a computer repair shop.

>The Jan. 16, 2024 court filing from special counsel David Weiss, opposing Hunter Biden's motion to dismiss the case against him, states: "A search warrant was also obtained for his laptop and the results of the search were largely duplicative of information investigators had already obtained from Apple"

So again, both the DOJ and FBI are saying the laptop was real, and that it was in fact a lap top and not an external HDD. Which means further attempts to argue otherwise are at this point, bad faith and can be summarily dismissed by calling you a Hunterfaggot, as your continued insistence and peddling this debunked narrative can only stem from your deep need to be gay lickspittle for him

>>1291755
>calling you a Hunterfaggot, as your continued insistence and peddling this debunked narrative can only stem from your deep need to be gay lickspittle for him

>it was an external HDD
>an Apple MacBook Pro that he had left at a computer repair shop

I said cloud and you came out blazing with this. Your reading comprehension is poor.

>>1291768
you said cloud and you were wrong. you then got btfo and now you're coping.

>>1291746
>still conflating the external hard drive with some random laptop from a blind guy
who is supposed to believe this

>>1291743
The president's son filming himself smoking crack and fucking whores isn't of public interest? Well, agree to disagree I guess, faggot.

Fox News pulls down series as Hunter Biden threatens lawsuit

Fox News has pulled down a six-part series in which it staged a mock trial of hypothetical criminal charges against Hunter Biden after the president's son threatened to sue the network.

The series, which was first posted on the cable network's right-wing streaming service back in October 2022, was removed only a day after Biden's legal team publicly made its threat.
https://www.npr.org/2024/04/30/1248<wbr>275971/fox-news-hunter-biden-series<wbr>-lawsuit-threat

>>1291837
Those pixs of Jennifer Lawrence's pussy were of interest to the public, but they were stolen, just like Hunter's. He didn't post them on the internet.
What;s so difficult about understanding this, stupid people?

what if i hacked your fat mama's apple acct and showed her roast beef on a porn site?

>>1291853
>Those pixs of Jennifer Lawrence's pussy were of interest to the public
If you could successfully argue that in court then you could make a case of fair use; however I do think there's a signifcant difference between the son of the president filming himself engaging in illegal activities and a celebrity's nude photos being leaked.

But if Democrats really want to lower that bar so much that Hunter can bunny-hop over it, I'm willing to watch and laugh.

>>1291853
Hunters laptop wasn't stolen you lying fool.
The computer repair guy should sue you for defamation.
The laptop became the computer repair guys property when Hunter didn't pay for the repair work, dumbass.
You are the stupidest motherfucker on this site by a long way.

>>1291853
They're evil, they fully understand it's wrong but they don't care

>>1291853
pretty sure fox never broadcast hunter biden's cock and balls on air. regardless, shills have now moved the goalposts all the way from "the laptop is russian disinformation" to "it was morally wrong"

>>1291768
>>1291791
>hunterfaggots coping poorly
Lmao

>>1291853
>random celebrity gettingbher casting couch blackmail exposed
>vs son of the fucking president participating in human trafficking and smoking drugs his father put people in jail for
Yeah not comparable, but nice try hunterfaggot

>>1291867
The computer repair guy had his home raided by the feds. Pretty sure he doesn't want to deal with this shit anymore.

>>1291877
>Hunterfaggots
You're the ones obsessed with him and his penis. Can you do anything but lie and project?

>>1291907
Why do you people lie left and right every fucking time a hunter Biden thread pops up

>>1291837
>The president's son filming himself smoking crack and fucking whores isn't of public interest?
No. The president's son wasn't a part of his political operation. What possible impact could him smoking crack and fucking whores have on the public?

>>1291937
as long as we focus on him, kushner's 2 billion dollar saudi bribe stays in the background

died with a smile on his face

>>1291937
>What possible impact could him smoking crack and fucking whores have on the public?

I spent all my $ savings on crack whores and I'm a senior and Hunter caused this because he's so cool and a role model and I wanted to be have a son just like him so we could do this stuff together(no incest homohk stuff).

Anonymous

>>1291937
>No. The president's son wasn't a part of his political operation.
I think sharing bank accounts with Joe and accepting bribes and jobs in Ukraine that he doesn't qualify for makes him part of the political operation.

>>1291938
That's a shitty what-a-butt-ism if you ask me.
Might wanna WIPE yourself off the face of the planet via sudoku, faggot.

retards retards everywhere and not a brane to think

>>1291863
>a celebrity's nude photos being leaked.
Stolen when Apple cloud was hacked>>1291867
>bad post

>The laptop became the computer repair guys property when Hunter didn't pay for the repair work

It's in the Geek Squad contract. all materials found on the device are the personal property of the client unless illegal by US law.

>>1291876
>"it was morally wrong"
No, it's illegally wrong.

>>1291877
>random celebrity gettingbher casting couch blackmail exposed
>vs son of the fucking president participating in human trafficking and smoking drugs
no human trafficing shill
and it dont matter who it is, dummy.

>>1291978
>illegally wrong
so legally right? agreed

>>1291978
>It's in the Geek Squad contract. all materials found on the device are the personal property of the client unless illegal by US law.
Repair shops typically have a boilerplate agreement (which was the case here) that if you abandon your property at their store that they own it after a certain period of time. This is usually 60-90 days. A lot of machines get abandoned at laptop repair shops; my first job was working at one 20 years ago. They all have this agreement.

>>1292029
good point, but you're forgetting that the crack smoking dick pic selfies were copyright protected.

>>1292056
Hunter's likeness is what is actually copyright protected and the suit is actually over defaming him with fake material.

>>1291396
I like Hunter, but I'm going to need a few more pictures of his cock if I'm gonna vote for the guy

>>1292067
t. one of 51 intelligence officials

>>1292059
>Hunter's likeness is what is actually copyright protected
When did he apply for a copyright on his own likeness?

>>1291978
Check.
So you're finally admitting it was Hunters laptop and all the incriminating evidence on it is true.

>>1291404
yes, they were slobbering over those too.


Whites only

Whites getting their own Town<br>https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/ar<wbr>ticle-13362499/louisiana-st-george-<wbr>supreme-court-ruling.html

jews rape kids

Why haven’t the blacks separated from the whites and make their own communist utopia with free KFC and grape drank.

white nats look don't touch

>>1291403
As a black resident from the poor side of town, at least i know where all the good stuff is to steal now
REPARATIONS NOW!!1
>>1291526
It's been conclusively proven that bigot scum consume CP at a higher rate than any other degenerate caste

Anonymous

>>1291403
If it's racist to separate myself from violent knee grows, then I'm a racist and I don't care.

>>1291403
Freedom Georgia an ALL BLACK TOWN founded in 2020 as a "safe haven for people of color" why is that not racist? Blacks have wanted their own communities in cities not policed by white cops, separate graduation ceremonies at university, hell, they just had their own national anthem sang at the Super Bowl. This is what they asked for and now they mad whitey is moving away. Do they have any concept of how much starting a new town will cost? Better get it together darkies - elect some officials that know the job of running a city instead of ones that just preach BS while their hand is in the till.

>>1291691
>why is that not racist?
It is. That's why there is no significant collection of black groups or black government officials saying we need to separate cities by race. Its a pretty fringe opinion not supported by the vast majority of black people.

>Better get it together darkies - elect some officials that know the job of running a city instead of ones that just preach BS while their hand is in the till.
The quality of elected officials means nothing without money and infrastructure. You could hire the world's best economists, officials and city builders and if you give them the budget and infrastructure of your average ghetto the results will be the same. So long as school budgets are determined by local property taxes then poor people will get bad schools and rich people will get great schools and the cycle of crime and poverty will continue into perpetuity.

>ayo fuck wypipo
>wtf where you finna go who gone pay for my babies

hahahahaha

>>1291443
Holy this freak is losing his shit. He also tried to ban me too bahahahah

>>1291693
A fucked up faggot society, yes.
Gayest shit ever this society.
It doesn't work for anyone and if you try to leave it you're le bad guy.

>>1291403
>Posting on Facebook, resident Sarah Stelly wrote: 'St George reeks of class division, it's quickly becoming the new worst type of bigotry.'

>Another resident, Paul Brady, wrote: 'The segregationist won. I'm no longer a citizen of Baton Rouge. I now live in the white enclave of St George.'
Libs continue to lib without realizing how stupid they are.
I wonder how many complainers will move to the areas of Baton Rouge they didn't want to live in initially.
I'm betting zero.

>>1291699
>we need access to you or we'll be poor forever
lmao

Cool.<br>Imagine how much you will be kings among men if you moved to Africa! They would welcome "brothers" with open arms and best of all? No white people!

>>1291403
>>niggers ruin the neighborhood
>>claim it's racist to want to live away from them.

SSDD

>>1291831
Well, let's be honest here. There are very few blacks who would even know what's going on or care.
It's the white people who're pitching a bitch over this. In fact, the leader of the "minoggities need access to whites" group is white.

>>1291827
Access to money and infrastructure, yes. You want a good idea of what it looks like when whites have no access to good education, good schools or infrastructure? North Dakota. As it turns out, race has little to nothing to do with it. Seems like every group reacts the same way when put into that environment.

>>1291403
why is it bad and evil for white people to want to live in their own town alone?

>>1292020
What the fuck? There's literally nothing wrong with North Dakota, you silly ass faggot.
It's never anywhere near the worst of any state by any metrics.


FINALLY: JUDGE HOLDS LAWLESS TRUMP IN CONTEMPT OF COURT

New York Supreme Court Justice Juan Merchan determined Tuesday that Donald Trump violated the terms of a gag order intended to prevent him from lobbing public attacks on people involved in his criminal hush money trial, warning the former president he could face jail time if he continues to ignore the order.

Trump “is hereby warned that the Court will not tolerate continued willful violations of its lawful orders and that if necessary and appropriate under the circumstances, it will impose an incarceratory punishment,” Merchan wrote in his ruling.

Merchan said the former president would be fined a total of $9,000, as the prosecution met the burden of proof for nine of the 10 incidents that the they alleged had violated the directive. Trump would need to make that payment by Friday, the ruling states.

Merchan said while the fine in this case is not sufficient to achieve its purpose given the wealth of the defendant, he does not have the discretion to increase the financial penalty, requiring him to “consider whether in some instances, jail may be a necessary punishment.”

“While $1,000 may suffice in most instances to protect the dignity of the judicial system, to compel respect for its mandates and to punish the offender for disobeying a court order, it unfortunately will not achieve the desired result in those instances where the contemnor can easily afford such a fine,” Merchan wrote.

Prosecutors argued at a hearing with the judge that Trump violated the order 10 times through derisive social media posts and posts to his official campaign website, putting witnesses in the case at risk of feeling intimidated.

“What happened here is precisely what the order was designed to prevent and the defendant doesn’t care,” prosecuting attorney Christopher Conroy said during the hearing last Tuesday.

https://www.huffpost.com/entry/trum<wbr>p-judge-gag-order-ruling_n_6627b21d<wbr>e4b096c7bac6280a

While Merchan rejected Trump’s argument that all the statements brought up by the prosecution were made in response to political attacks against him and were therefore allowed, he said one of Trump’s Truth Social posts could potentially fall under that category, ruling that the prosecution did not meet the burden of proof in that instance.

In the April 10 post, Trump had praised Michael Avenatti, an attorney who once represented porn star Stormy Daniels, “for revealing the truth about two sleaze bags who have, with their lies and misrepresentations, cost our Country dearly!” in reference to Daniels and Michael Cohen, Trump’s former personal fixer, who are both expected to testify in the trial.

Trump’s lawyers referred to two social media posts by Cohen, one of which mentioned the possibility of Avenatti receiving a presidential pardon by Trump if gets reelected in November.

While it’s unclear whether Trump’s comment is “in fact, a response to these two posts, the tenuous correlation is sufficient to give this Court pause as to whether the People have met their burden as to this Exhibit,” Merchan wrote.

Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg charged the former president with 34 counts of falsifying business records in relation to his 2016 payoff to Daniels, who alleges she had an affair with Trump while he was married. Trump denies the affair and has pleaded not guilty.

Prosecutors urged the judge to fine Trump $1,000 per alleged violation. He was similarly fined at his state-level civil fraud trial; a judge told him to fork over $15,000 for violating a gag order in that case.

The posts that landed Trump in hot water included a claim he amplified from Fox News anchor Jesse Watters, who said “they are catching undercover Liberal Activists lying to the Judge in order to get on the Trump Jury.” Whether reposts would be treated the same as Trump’s own original content in the eyes of the court was subject to extensive debate during the hearing last week. The judge did not appear amenable to the idea that reposts did not have the same effect as originals.

“This is not a repost but rather the Defendant’s own words,” Merchan wrote. “Mr. Watters uttered a statement which Defendant altered, placed in quotes, attributed to Mr. Watters and posted. The purpose being to call into question the legitimacy of the jury selection process in this case. This constitutes a clear violation of the Expanded Order and requires no further analysis.”

In other posts, Trump said the trial represented “Communism at its worst,” called Merchan a “HIGHLY CONFLICTED & CORRUPT JUDGE,” described the court and Bragg as “animals” and said Cohen was a “sleaze bag.”

Trump has also been smearing Cohen as a liar since opening statements were made in court last Monday, even though Cohen is expected to be a key witness for the prosecution.

>$9,000 fine for somebody who is literally a billionaire
Watch out, he might have to whip out the checkbook for that one. Or sell another pair of sneakers.

>>1291558
Or spend a night in jail if he keeps it up (please do it please please please)

>>1291564
>Jailing a former president for tweeting.
I don't think so, but you can dream faggot.

>>1291570
if the tweets do something contrary to the judge's order in his criminal trial, then yes, it's going to happen whether you think so or not.

>>1291572
Judges have to lay their little heads down and sleep at night, too.

>>1291573
So do chuds who threaten judges

>>1291575
>Jail everybody I don't like!
Ok, if you say so. Come get me glowniggers, you got my address already right?

>>1291577
>Jail everyone who makes a veiled criminal threat against judges in Trump's criminal trials
Yes.

>>1291578
I'm waiting right here faggot. Whenever you're ready.

>>1291583
It's like you think they operate on your schedule. If they come for you it will be when you least expect it.

>>1291570
Home arrest with ankle bracelet for 2 weeks...no campaigning

>>1291577
Why is this the go to excuse for breaking the law for conservatives?

>>1291599
>mom I called the guy who made me BTFO a tranny again
Does it ever get tiresome?

The shills and glowniggers are out in force in this thread.

>>1291603
I'm ironically reminded of the old nazi saying, something about "crying out in pain as he strikes you"... He has become as bad as the stereotypes he hates.

>>1291604
Counterpoint: there are no shills on this dead board, just dumbasses.

>>1291602
Just gonna say, you wouldn't care unless you were a tranny, or a dyke.

>>1291609
schizo logic is pretty amusing

>>1291609
I'm curious if you've ever counted the number of times you randomly bring up trannies out of nowhere in a single day, and stop to question why that number is in the double or triple digits.

So according to republicans...
>Trump committing election interference is fine
>Trump committing Witness tampering is fine
>Even giving Trump warnings and slap on the wrists is considered corruption of the judicial system.
>Trump shouldn't be held responsible for the stochastic terrorism he incites

jews rape kids

>>1291612
Definitely a permanent gaping bloody hole.

Anonymous

>>1291611
Logic? I spun the wheel of faggots.
It said your mom's gay but sucks all the dicks.

>>1291615
>stochastic terrorism
You faggots are so creative with the new names you come up with.

>>1291616
How many photos of trannies do you have saved?

>>1291620
It's been around for years. Trump just helped popularized it when he was encouraging his followers to attack judges in the 2016 election.

>>1291620
it's not a new word, maybe you're new to the english language?

>>1291620
Trump did engage in good old fashion Terrorism with his failed coup on January 6th.

>>1291624
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stoch<wbr>astic_terrorism
>As of 2016
lol, you stupid faggots.

>>1291627
>another chud who thinks it's 2016
I'm noticing a trend with this...

https://thehill.com/regulation/cour<wbr>t-battles/4633568-trump-removes-soc<wbr>ial-media-posts-that-violated-gag-o<wbr>rder/<br>Trump Kneels to the Judge!

>>1291627
the term originates from its first use in 2002. do you like being made fun of for your poor reading comprehension?

>>1291637
i think you need to find a therapist so you can stop projecting on us

>>1291633
I enjoy learning the newspeech vocabulary, comrad! It makes me laugh when you guys come up with new fagspeak and pretend "tHeSe wOrDs hAvE AlWaYz eXiStEd!!!"

jews rape kids

>>1291640
Between my white loving family, smart finances, great health, and early retirement, life is great for me.

Anonymous

>>1291641
you really are a snowflake, i can't believe the existence of certain words is getting you this riled up

>>1291644
no cap, anon. you are a snowflake

It's weird the Stochastic terrorism people would accuse Trump of Stochastic terrorism.<br>The people of the Floyd riots, who ensured there'd be riots are complaining about Stochastic terrorism and I'm ova 'ere laughin' my ass off.

>>1291646
>Whatabout
For a group that always claims they don't conspire with the Russians, Republicans sure like using their tactics.

>>1291655
is the KGB in the room with you now?

>>1291658
>Another canned response
Right wing just can't meme

>>1291655
You're using the term "whataboutism" wrong again?
This is comparative, not distractive, Slapnuts.

>>1291664
Nope. Besides who ever said tu quoque wasn't valid?
You literally have no grounds to judge anyone, terrorist.

>>1291670
>ad hominem
The far right fascist grasping at straws to justify his terrorism, yet again.

drumpf is firmly in the 'find out' phase

>>1291621
>>1291637
so you don't have any friends?
imagine being a namefag

>>1291615
Hi anon. I am a foreigner, so I don't vote.
Here's what I noticed.
>>Trump committing election interference is fine
It is not fine but it pales in comparison to the amount of Jerrymandering that occurred in the past century. You choose to see only what displeases you.

>>Trump committing Witness tampering is fine
Ahem... It seemed to be fine when Dems allowed Epstein to be killed while under 24/7 surveillance

>>Even giving Trump warnings and slap on the wrists is considered corruption of the judicial system
It is so if you place gag orders on political candidates

>>Trump shouldn't be held responsible for the stochastic terrorism he incites
Woke culture and cultural Marxism have led to way more suicides than you think.

>>1291705
>I am a foreigner
That explains why you're shilling for Trump so blatantly.
Ruble or rupee is the only real question to ask you.

>>1291705
>Dems allowed Epstein to be killed
Dems tipped over my garbage can last night too

>>1291737
Dems shit my pants and fucked my wife

>>1291737
I don't even understand why he'd try and make that claim.
Epstein was held in a federal prision, so Trump controlled it and Barr, Trump's AG secretly met with Epstein right before he was murdered.

>>1291740
Its important to keep in mind his understanding of the world begins and ends with conspiracy shitposts on substack. You can't expect him to be aware of any other information.

>>1291705
>It is not fine but it pales in comparison to the amount of Jerrymandering that occurred in the past century. You choose to see only what displeases you.
Both sides do this though. In fact, when you look at the numbers Republicans have an advantage.
>Ahem... It seemed to be fine when Dems allowed Epstein to be killed while under 24/7 surveillance
Why would this be a democrat-exclusive thing?
>It is so if you place gag orders on political candidates
Why would a candidate be immune to gag orders? In that case, everyone who is on trial should run for office.
>Woke culture and cultural Marxism have led to way more suicides than you think.
What does this have to do with your quote?

>>1291752
>Why would a candidate be immune to gag orders?
The US gov makes exceptions for the conduct of presidential candidates for the sake of a smooth transition of power. I mean.. it used to.

>>1291753
>The US gov makes exceptions for the conduct of presidential candidates for the sake of a smooth transition of power.
??? No they haven't??? The judicial branch isn't required to do anything like that.

>>1291753
Where does it say that in law?

>>1291759
It doesn't. It was the policy of the DoJ and judicial branch, same as presidential immunity was.

This was why SCOTUS refused to hear any of the election lawsuits in 2021. The judicial branch is slowwww, and if Biden was found to be an illegally elected president, then that would basically mean every single bill and EO signed by POTUS up until that point would be illegally signed, creating a constitutional crisis.

There isn't any set of instructions in the US constitution which lays out how to walk back an election. It just doesn't happen. Which is why it's better to get the election out the door and try your luck at the next one rather than spending years litigating the past.

>>1291763
>It doesn't. It was the policy of the DoJ and judicial branch, same as presidential immunity was.
This it's not a policy though. It's just that no one commits obvious crimes like your president.
>>1291763
>This was why SCOTUS refused to hear any of the election lawsuits in 2021.
That's not the reason at all. They were thrown out because they were silly. You should read what some of the official statements were as even Trump's own lawyers refused to call it rigged when it came to court.
>and if Biden was found to be an illegally elected president, then that would basically mean every single bill and EO signed by POTUS up until that point would be illegally signed, creating a constitutional crisis.
Yeah it would be a headache, but that's not why they were thrown out before Jan 6

>>1291765
>It's just that no one commits obvious crimes like your president.
Every president commits crimes anon.
>You should read what some of the official statements were
They were all dismissed on technicalities.
For example, SCOTUS argued that one lawsuit couldn't be heard because it wasn't 'ripe' until the election fraud had happened. And then they said it was too late to sue after the election finalized.
They also ruled that they didn't have the responsibility to adjudicate conflicts between the jurisdictions of states. Which is literally their job as the final appellate court of the United States.
Democrats are basically breaking all the norms to prevent Trump from running, which is hilarious, as its bound to bite them in the ass.
>tfw your president is considered too retarded to be convicted for crimes

>>1291767
>Democrats are basically breaking all the norms to prevent Trump from running
Other way around, Trump is obligated to answer for the 91+ criminal charges that have been levied against him.
He is not obligated to run for office.
Likewise it's republicans breaking every norm and rule in the book by running a sham impeachment against Biden to the point we found out their key source was a Russian spy.

>>1291769
no one but rachel maddow's audience takes seriously the "91+ criminal charges". tweeting mean things isn't a criminal offense.

>>1291772
Proving my point about how Republicans are breaking every norm and excusing all of Turmp's criminal behavior.
In the trial OP is about
Election interfere and witness intimidation are both crimes, which Trump has committed.

>>1291776
You do know he has to be found guilty for it to e a crime, right?
And it's safe to say anything out of banana New York isn't valid either.

>>1291779
>It doesn't count because of 'unfounded reasons'
Not helping your case. Especially when your excuses are 'everyone commits crimes'

>>1291780
>>1291769
You're responding to multiple users. That wasn't me.
Also, when we speak of norms, we're talking about things like presidential immunity.
If Trump is prosecuted, republicans are going to go after every single democratic president going forward. Because that's the precedent they will have set.

>>1291785
No one is above the law, presidential immunity is not a thing and that's Trump and the Republicans breaking the norm.

>>1291787
>No one is above the law
..yeah, many people are actually. That's why Obama was allowed to drone strike children and nobody could prosecute him.
Congress is also an insider trading paradise. They invested in arms manufacturers right before signing lend-lease act to Ukraine, and invested in Pfizer before using American taxdollars to pay for vaxx R&D.
Stop watching retarded lefty lawyers tell you how the world works.

>>1291788
>Whataboutism
Actually, it's always been the case with Republicans.
Nixon should have been prosecuted for sabotaging the Paris Accords. Reagan should have been prosecuted for Iran Contra, George H W Bush for running a cover up of Iran Contra. George W Bush for War crimes and Trump for all his crimes.

>>1291585
Feds can't and won't do shit, they get routinely cucked by random sovereign citizens and local cops.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nwP<wbr>EtFNZpiI

>>1291705
uhhhhh, wasn't epstein in jail under the trump administration??? how did the democrats allow this to happen when he was in federal prison during the trump administration??

>>1291801
Not the one Obama didn't put him in.

>>1291789
So you admit that presidential immunity has existed since Nixon?
Terrific, thanks for playing.

>>1291808
Nixon was pardoned, Trump wasn't, learn your history.

>>1291809
Obama did exactly what Nixon did, but worse, and suffered no consequences for it.

>>1291812
Yep. Just like Nixon, Slapnuts.

>>1291812
Spied on a political opponent's campaign, are you retarded or are you seriously calling Nixon black?

>>1291824
You mean that political campaign that conspired with the Russians and who's party continues to conspire with the Russians? An enemy of America?
Sounds like Obama did the right thing to monitor traitors.

>>1291835
Are you talking about the Steele dossier?

>>1291836
Funny how Trump is still obsessed with the piss tape. screams consciousness of guilt

>>1291838
Yeah, Democrats just love that Russian propaganda.

>>1291839
Funny how it's Trump and the Republicans who are always caught conspiring with the Russians though.
Did you already forget the Republican's star witness was a Russian spy who was arrested?

>>1291840
>2024
>Still believing Hill Dawg's oppo research trash.

>>1291842
>>1291841
>Still stuck in 2016 because the Russians still haven't updated your talking points
How /pol/ has fallen.

In the text of his order, Merchan lamented that the fines' costs "unfortunately will not achieve the desired result in those instances where the contemnor can easily afford such a fine."
"Criminal contempt is punishable by a fine not exceeding $1,000, by jail not exceeding 30 days or by both in the discretion of the court, for each violation of a court order," Merchan wrote.
"However, the Judiciary Law, does not vest the Court with authority to craft an appropriate punishment when a $1,000 fine will not achieve the intended purpose. While $1,000 may suffice in most instances to protect the dignity of the judicial system, to compel respect for its mandates and to punish the offender for disobeying a court order, it unfortunately will not achieve the desired result in those instances where the contemnor can easily afford such a fine," he continued.

Fucking lol.
Also, what was the point then? Just a middle finger to Trump? You can't shut him up and you won't dare throw him in jail.
This whole trial is just good publicity now, just end it.

>>1291843
no, the Russian government runs troll farms that flood social media with pro Trump misinformation. This is how the Russians help trump. Not some stupid Christopher Steele shit about how trump loves golden showers. That's just funny and we bring it up because it expose who Trump really is, a filthy pervert.

Yet that has nothing to do with the Russian troll farms and their constant attempt to Boost Trump.

>>1291860
Faggots ,degenerates and treasonous cunts own companies and NGO's like Share Blue to run troll farms that employ useful idiots like you to cover up the crimes of the so called elite and swamp creatures by projecting their own crimes onto their enemies.
You are a useful idiot that will be the first against the wall if your employers ever get their way but your too dumb to learn from history.
In also think that Trump is an idiot by the way so your usual retort of calling me a Trumper or maga fool doesn't work against me.
Both sides are terrible for the people but the Democrats are the greater evil.

>>1291843
>everyone but me is stuck in 2016
>everyone but me is /pol/
The irony

Is /pol/ in the room with your right now?

>>1291702
>jewdicial system
 a jewdicial system would work in Trump's favor

>>1291858
The fines lay the groundwork for escalating punishments for repeated violations. First there was a warning, then a gag order when the warning was ignored, then these fines for repeated violations of the law. If these do not serve as a deterrent, perhaps 30 days in jail will compel the defendant to respect the rule of law
>>1291871
I hope you're the first to die when SHTF, lumpenfascist retard
eVeRyOnE I dOnT LIeK iS A sHaReBleU Shill
>reeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee<wbr>e
you are like a child stumbling into a discussion between adults, injecting your verbal diarrhea and fouling the air for everyone.
please consider killing yourself ASAP
>>1291879
It's funny to see lumpen/pol/s repurposing the language used to expose their obsession with trans people :)

>>1291860
There was the fact that Trump's family conspired with the Russians at his Tower, or his campaign head handing over campaign information to the Russians.
Or Trump burning one of the US's top spies in Russia, to the Russians, after he became president forcing the CIA to extract him to save his life.
https://www.businessinsider.com/us-<wbr>extracted-russia-spy-trump-classifi<wbr>ed-info-oval-office-2019-9

>>1291577
>Jail everybody I don't like!
How very conservative of you

>>1291918
Are you projecting? Do you have erectile dysfunction?

>>1291944
>muh Trump Tower meeting
Daily reminder that, along with the entire debunked Russian-collusion narrative, was orchestrated by Fusion GPS and the Clinton campaign

https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-new<wbr>s/trump-dossier-firm-also-supplied-<wbr>info-used-meeting-russians-trump-n8<wbr>19526
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/fu<wbr>sion-gps-official-met-with-russian-<wbr>operative-before-and-after-trump-jr<wbr>-sit-down

Reminder: Fusion GPS CEO was sworn and testified before congress and stated that:
-His firm, Fusion GPS, supplied the Russian lawyer with the info in the meeting
-Glen Simpson met with the Russian lawyer the days immediately before and after the meeting
-Fusion GPS has a previous relationship with the lawyer as she was involved with a lawsuit they were working on years before

>>1291895
>>1291928
Pipe down zippertits, superior-CIS people are talking

>>1292233
Who are you virtue signaling for this time?

>>1292232
>Trump's family conspiring with the Russians debunks the claim that Trump conspires with the Russians.
>Does nothing to refute the claim that Trump burned a top spy in Russia to the Russians.

>>1292258
>refuses to admit Russian-collusion narrative has been debunked 1000x times and was literally crafted by Fusion GPS and the Clinton campaign

Mueller time when?

>>1292260
>purposely leaving out that it wasn't debunked
The Bipartisan Senate Report which came out in 2020 contradicted the Mueller report.

>>1292263
Haven't killed yourself yet, huh?
Might wanna get on that if lying on a dead board is all you have to live fore.

>>1292271
Where's the lie? How much longer are you going to stay in denial?

>>1292271
https://www.forbes.com/sites/jackbr<wbr>ewster/2020/08/18/putin-ordered-dnc<wbr>-hack-bipartisan-senate-report-conf<wbr>irms/
>No ‘Hoax’: Bipartisan Senate Report Confirms Russian 2016 Role, Putin Ordered DNC Hack, More

>>1292260
Mueller confirmed crime and sent it to Bill Barr who killed the investigation. Bill even says now in interviews this week that he did it to protect Trump not because he thought there was no crime. Barr even said this week that he thinks Trump tried to steal the election but he doesn’t care and will vote for him again.

Corruption not even trying to hide.

>>1292273
Not him but there will always be contrarians. There are still people alive who think Richard Nixon did nothing wrong.

>>1292260
>If I keep pushing the lie that Trump conspiring with the Russians didn't happen it will come true!
Just ignore stuff like Trump's family conspiring with the Russians at his Tower, or his campaign head handing over campaign information to the Russians to use in their election interference.

>>1292263
>>1292273
>>1292287
>>1292291
>>1292296
>>1292326
>demoshill libshit pissbabies mad no one believes in Hillary's conspiracy theories anymore
Troon headcannon is wild

Why do terminally online conservatives continually bring up trans people?
Are they obsessed with them?
Projecting their own insecurities?
Anyway, it's good to see that Trump is starting to face consequences for his many crimes. $9000 here, $450 million there, $5 million over there, $83 million around there somewhere. More to come too I hear! Possibly jail! Maybe even an execution (firing squad, bing bong pow x_x)


Iraq criminalises same-sex relationships and transgenderism with new law

https://www.bbc.com/news/world-midd<wbr>le-east-68914551

Iraq's parliament has passed a bill criminalising same-sex relationships with jail terms of between 10 and 15 years.

Transgender people could also be sent to prison for between one and three years under the new law.

Supporters of the changes say they will help to uphold religious values in the country.

Rights groups say they are a further black mark on Iraq's record of violations against LGBT people.

Those who promote homosexuality or prostitution, doctors who perform gender reassignment surgery, men who "intentionally" act like women and those who engage in "wife swapping" will also face prison terms under the new legislation.

A previous draft of the bill - an amendment to an anti-prostitution law that was passed in the late 1980s - had proposed capital punishment for same-sex relationships.

However, this was amended after facing opposition from the US and other Western countries.

MP Amir al-Maamouri told Shafaq News on Saturday that the new law was "a significant step in combating sexual deviancy given the infiltration of unique cases contradicting Islamic and societal values".

Passing the bill had been postponed until after Prime Minister Mohamed Shia al-Sudani's visit to the US earlier this month, according to lawmaker Raed al-Maliki, who advanced the amendments.

"We didn't want to impact the visit," Mr al-Maliki told the AFP news agency, adding that it was "an internal matter and we do not accept any interference in Iraqi affairs".

LGBT people have long been targeted by the authorities in Iraq, with other morality laws previously being used to punish them.

Human Rights Watch and other human rights organisations have also detailed several cases of abduction, torture, rape and murder.

Major Iraqi political parties have in recent years stepped up criticism of LGBT rights, with rainbow flags being burned at protests.

The US State Department said in a statement that the passing of the law reforms were a threat to human rights and freedoms.

"The legislation also weakens Iraq's ability to diversify its economy and attract foreign investment," it added.

"International business coalitions have already indicated that such discrimination in Iraq will harm business and economic growth in the country."

UK Secretary of State Lord David Cameron, meanwhile, described the amendments as "dangerous and worrying".

"No one should be targeted for who they are," he wrote on X, formerly Twitter.

"We encourage the Government of Iraq to uphold human rights and freedoms of all people without distinction."
___

https://www.france24.com/en/middle-<wbr>east/20240428-iraq-criminalises-sam<wbr>e-sex-relationships-with-harsh-pris<wbr>on-sentences

>The amendments also ban organisations that “promote” homosexuality and punish “wife swapping” with a prison sentence of 10 to 15 years.

>>1290955
Fantastic. Yknow this really puts it in perspective. America, so called first world country, allows and encourages people to be their most degenerate self. Iraq, a bombed out miserable shit hole, does the right thing and knows gayness is a sickness.

Really makes ya think.

>>1290969
>Conservatives jerking off about how cool it would be to live in a theocratic regime with no personal freedoms
Every time

>>1290970
too much personal freedom leads to societal ruin

>>1290973
>Unff, I LOVE when the government tells me how I can dress and act

>>1290955
based iraq throwing off the global homo. Though I thought iraq already had a tradition of toons

>>1290970
>cutting off your child's dick and having sodomy are personal freedoms
>religion, freedom of expression and the right to keep and bear arms are not personal freedoms

>>1290974
>>1290970
sodomy kills more people each year in the US than AR-15s do

>>1290955
Damn they couldn't have made an exception for lesbians? Cause that's hot. God damn Muslims are gay.

>>1291031
CDC
>>1290992
lesbians aren't real. its literally just straight girls fucking other girls for attention

>>1290974
The government here is more likely to tell you to sodomize your own asshole or the asshole of grade school kids, usually both

>>1291140
boring fanfiction, it's been done to death by news schizos

>>1290978
>cutting off your child's dick
Imagine being so obsessed with trans shit that you literally invent delusions about child penises to get upset about.

>having sodomy are personal freedoms
Yes, of course. Normal Americans who believe in the constitution usually like to keep the government out of consenting adults' bedrooms. You, on the other hand, deeply desire an authoritarian surveillance state.

>religion, freedom of expression and the right to keep and bear arms are not personal freedoms
Yes they are. They are negative freedoms enshrined and protected by law. The government has no right to interfere in your freedom to worship who you want, express yourself how you want or to keep and bear arms. This is what it is to live in a free, democratic society. I don't know why you're fighting this so hard. You love the government telling you what to do, how you're allowed to look, act, dress and think. You desire boots on your neck. When conservatives say people who don't share our values shouldn't live here, you are who they're talking about - authoritarian boot lickers who think the government should control people's lives and expression.

>>1291140
Chud headcanon is wild

>>1291203
>Imagine being so obsessed
why not ban trannying minors then?
>Yes, of course. Normal Americans who believe in the constitution
where does it say sodomy in the constitution? Also you are a fucking faggot who doesn't believe in freedom of expression, assembly or the right to keep and bear arms. You cite the constitution for shit not in it, while at the same time hating the shit in it.
>I don't know why you're fighting this so hard. You love the government telling you what to do, how you're allowed to look, act, dress and think.
not me, the faggots
>When conservatives say people who don't share our values shouldn't live here, you are who they're talking about - authoritarian boot lickers who think the government should control people's lives and expression.
conservatives aren't authoritarian and fags and trannies aren't people

>>1291223
>why not ban trannying minors then?
It is. There are no children getting their genitals removed. You've invented this in your head.

>where does it say sodomy in the constitution?
That isn't how the constitution works. The constitution covers a lot of activity that isn't explicitly mentioned in its texts. That's what constitutional law is for. That's what the supreme court is for you fucking moron. The supreme court, by the way, ruled in Lawrence v. Texas that sodomy laws are unconstitutional. So the constitution, in fact, does protect sodomy. Cope.

>Also you are a fucking faggot who doesn't believe in freedom of expression, assembly or the right to keep and bear arms
You're either illiterate or you're unironically delusional. You're arguing with someone in your own mind.

>conservatives aren't authoritarian and fags and trannies aren't people
Well, the courts and the constitution disagrees with you. You're the minority. Cope with that however you need.

>>1291233
>It is.
it isn't. troons flip the fuck out every time a red state tries to ban trooning and there are high school troons
>That isn't how the constitution works. The constitution covers a lot of activity that isn't explicitly mentioned in its texts. That's what constitutional law is for. That's what the supreme court is for you fucking moron. The supreme court, by the way, ruled in Lawrence v. Texas
ok you are a legit retard. you are still going off the communist griswald shit activist judge bullshit they pulled just because they didn't have the votes to actually pass a law. Hopefully that shit gets corrected in Dobbs part 2 and goes back to state laws like it should be. Also weird how you are fine with state laws violating the 2nd amendment.
>You're either illiterate or you're unironically delusional. You're arguing with someone in your own mind.
I'm arguing against you troon. we both know you are anti gun
>Well, the courts and the constitution disagrees with you. You're the minority. Cope with that however you need.
the constitution literally does not protect sodomy or cutting off your kids dick. it falls under the 10th amendment, like baby murder. Griswald will fall and RBG will keep burning in hell

>>1291243
>it isn't. troons flip the fuck out every time a red state tries to ban trooning and there are high school troons
So, you concede. There are no children getting their genitals removed. You made it up.

>ok you are a legit retard. you are still going off the communist griswald shit activist judge bullshit they pulled just because they didn't have the votes to actually pass a law.
You concede again. The supreme court, the highest court in the land, voted 6-3 that anti-sodomy laws are unconstitutional. Sodomy, in the U.S. is a constitutionally protected activity. Cope.

>I'm arguing against you troon. we both know you are anti gun
Awwww Its getting BTFO'd so badly its trying to pivot away to shit that has nothing to do with what we're talking about.

>the constitution literally does not protect sodomy
It literally does. Lawrence v. Texas. Supreme Court ruling. 6-3 majority. Cope.

>cutting off your kids dick
A thing that you made up in your own mind.

>it falls under the 10th amendment, like baby murder. Griswald will fall and RBG will keep burning in hell
Yeah let me know how that works out for you, schizo. Enjoy your BTFO.

>>1291250
>So, you concede. There are no children getting their genitals removed. You made it up.
there are. there are high school troons. how are there high school troons if they are not castrating kids?
>You concede again. The supreme court,
you sure as fuck don't know what concede means. but thanks for admitting abortion is murder and not protected by the constitution and all gun laws are unconstitutional.
>Awwww Its getting BTFO'd so
only one getting btfo'd here is you faggot and also you have no dick
>It literally does. Lawrence v. Texas. Supreme Court ruling. 6-3 majority. Cope.
show me where in the constitution the word "sodomy" is mentioned.
>A thing that you made up in your own mind.
so you would be fine with a federal ban on all tranny healthcare for anyone under the age of 45?
>Yeah let me know how that works out for you, schizo. Enjoy your BTFO.
worked out great for me in Dobbs, especially when I have a 6-3 advantage and all you have is seethe

>>1291263
>how are there high school troons if they are not castrating kids?
Jesus Christ. Do you actually think all trans people have had bottom surgery? You're actually dumber than I thought.

>but thanks for admitting abortion is murder and not protected by the constitution and all gun laws are unconstitutional.
Fucking kek. I love watching you try to pivot away and ramble about irrelevant shit because you got BTFO'd on the constitution protecting sodomy.

>only one getting btfo'd here is you faggot and also you have no dick
Look guys its getting angry

>show me where in the constitution the word "sodomy" is mentioned.
Here's a link to the Lawrence v. Texas ruling. The Supreme Court ruled 6-3 that sodomy is a constitutionally protected activity. Anti-sodomy laws violate the constitutionally protected right to privacy and the due process clause. Cope.

>https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lawr<wbr>ence_v._Texas

>so you would be fine with a federal ban on all tranny healthcare for anyone under the age of 45?
So you concede. Children aren't getting their genitals removed. You made it up in your mind.

>worked out great for me in Dobbs, especially when I have a 6-3 advantage and all you have is seethe
I don't care about Dobbs. We're talking about Lawrence v. Texas where the Supreme Court found that sodomy is protected by the constitution. You were wrong. You got absolutely blown the fuck out by the Supreme Court. Cope.

>>1291266
>Jesus Christ.
don't use the lords name in vain, tranny lover. children should get zero tranny medical care. and if it never happens why not have a federal ban on child castration?
>Fucking kek. I love watching you try to pivot away and ramble about irrelevant shit
holy shit you are retarded. Do you not know about dobbs and bruen?
>Look guys its getting angry
only one seething is you
>Here's a link to the Lawrence v. Texas ruling
that isn't the constitution and Clarance Thomas has already said it is retarded bullshit. Please show me the section, clause or amendment that mentions sodomy
>So you concede. Children aren't getting their genitals removed. You made it up in your mind.
so why wouldn't you agree to a castration ban and mandatory jail time for anyone with a tranny kid?
>I don't care about Dobbs.
dobbs literally is about the same due process clause griswald bullshit lawrence is and dobbs partially overturned griswald. but you don't know how to read so you can't understand how decisions affect each other

>>1291269
>don't use the lords name in vain, tranny lover. children should get zero tranny medical care. and if it never happens why not have a federal ban on child castration?
I accept your concession. Children aren't getting their genitals removed. You lied. You made it up in your mind.

>that isn't the constitution
Supreme court disagrees. Cope.

>Do you not know about dobbs and bruen?
No no, schizo. We're not pivoting to different topics. We're not talking about guns or abortion. We're talking about sodomy, which the Supreme Court says is a constitutionally protected activity. Cope.

>Please show me the section, clause or amendment that mentions sodomy
In the Lawrence v. Texas Supreme Court opinion. Anti-sodomy laws violate the right to privacy and the due process clause. Cope.

>so why wouldn't you agree to a castration ban and mandatory jail time for anyone with a tranny kid?
I accept your concession. Children aren't getting their genitals removed. You lied. You made it up in your mind.

>dobbs literally is about the same due process clause griswald bullshit lawrence is and dobbs partially overturned griswald. but you don't know how to read so you can't understand how decisions affect each other
Supreme Court. 6-3. Lawrence v. Texas. Sodomy is constitutionally protected. You were wrong. Cope. Enjoy your BTFO. I'm bored now.

>>1291271
>I accept your concession. Children aren't getting their genitals removed.
you literally have not proven that. there are tranny kids.
>Supreme court disagrees. Cope.
partially overturned in dobbs. the rest will fall Alito and Thomas hate griswald
Please show me the section, clause or amendment that mentions sodomy
>No no, schizo. We're not pivoting to different topics. We're not talking about guns or abortion. We're talking about sodomy, which the Supreme Cou
dobbs and lawrence both address griswald you fucking retard and since you say the scotus is settled law, you believe abortion isn't a right and all gun laws are unconstitutional
Please show me the section, clause or amendment that mentions sodomy
>In the Lawrence v. Texas Supreme Court opinion. Anti-sodomy laws violate the right to privacy and the due process clause. Cope.
in dobbs, the SCOTUS said the griswald view of the due process clause, which lawrence relies on, is bullshit.
Please show me the section, clause or amendment that mentions sodomy
>I accept your concession. Children aren't getting their genitals removed. You lied. You made it up in your mind.
then why are there tranny kids? Why are you against anti troon laws?
>Supreme Court. 6-3. Lawrence v. Texas. Sodomy is constitutionally protected. You were wrong. Cope. Enjoy your BTFO.
partially overturned by dobbs. thomas said he is going to nuke all of griswald
>I'm bored now.
we both know you will be back because you are obsessed with trannies and are just trying to throw out an insult

>>1291266
>bottom surgery
What are you a child?

>>1291367
damn trannies really got btfo'd hard itt just like every thread

>>1290955
Third world countries are looking better and better these days.

>>1291377
How are you always wrong about everything?

>>1291380
It's very unlikely there are two different people with /pol/schizo-tier opinions here.

>>1291381
>being against castrating children is a /pol/schizo-tier opinion

>>1291411
Bad faith lying troon is bad faith and lying

>>1291422
Yes it is since that isn't really happening anywhere else but your head.

>>1291478
>The Komodo analysis of insurance claims found 56 genital surgeries among patients ages 13 to 17 with a prior gender dysphoria diagnosis from 2019 to 2021.
Nta but it is indeed happening and you've been btfo. Now move the goalpost.

>>1291480
In your mind that actually means something but everywhere else on the planet it doesn't

>>1291483
The data does matter, you can't refute it, and you've been btfo. Thanks for playing ggez

>>1291485
>things that happened in my head are real
No they aren't.

>>1291381
Why would that be? This is 4chan not Reddit.

>>1291600
>another lost /pol/tard thinks all of 4chan is /pol/
Whoa that never happens

>>1291610
But it mostly is. That's what the news, and movie jews told me too.

>>1291480
>https://www.reuters.com/investigat<wbr>es/special-report/usa-transyouth-ca<wbr>re/
>The Komodo analysis of insurance claims found 56 genital surgeries, including vaginoplasty and other procedures, among patients ages 13 to 17 with a prior gender dysphoria diagnosis from 2019 to 2021.
Your own source doesn't say what you claim it does. Children in the U.S. aren't getting full sexual reassignment surgeries. The goalposts will remain where they are, thanks.

>>1291706
>56 genital surgeries, including vaginoplasty and other procedures, among patients ages 13 to 17
>13

Are 13 year olds not children to you anon? If thats the case I have two questions:

1. What do you think the age of consent should be?
2. Are you allowed to be within 100 yards of schools?

>>1291706
>I just want legal baby murder, and to legalize children fucking themselves up of faggotry that most of them grow out of!!
>Me and the baby-killing fetus eaters are the moral authority.
Normal people hate this shit, dyke. No one wants a troon kid, except Munchausen mothers.

>>1291761
What the fuck does an extremist like you know about normal people?

USA currencies owner

You sure marijuana ain’t sabotage like gay donkey show USA? Uh I’m not sure probably but why procreate if high and marijuana taxes for health are gonna be like 10 dollars per pack of 5 dollar cigarettes , blood pressure psychoactive causes mental illness causes heart attacks panic attacks etc etc etc you guys act like your all artists named prince formerly hairy desantis

Also that shit stinks on the street is like COVID’s and flu prticles travel miles in marijuana smoke

It’s probably trump is Chinese dildo too dumb to live in USA

Sure if it’s social drug instead of beer but it’s lsd marijuana opiates alcohol tobacco cocaine

Take a dip of chew then tell me it’s worse then cocaine , also coffee is nearly as bad , alcohol is basically worse however you need a cartel to make shit expensive

What’s mass consumption of beer , not sure if eu Protestants or France can repay for those debts

Inbevs gonna buy me new eu monarch

Ru Protestants owe Germany uh say 50 trillion France 1000 trillion Dutch uh 25 trillion Finland Sweden Norway maybe 1 to 3 trillion each rest of euro states maybe hundreds of billions Poland maybe 100000000 trillion basically ussr lone wolf

What to euthanize Europeans or make dolls?

You guys ain’t worth one cent can’t even pay the golden goose

Longhorns ids for sale dildo is full of shit is Saudi sixteen from sept 11 cashing in Farmington satans anus

She swears she made Facebook with tik tok and china Chyna but she forgot her stolen face at embudo

Dutch ain’t worth 25 trillion new toilet for Kansas

They take university ids to Dixie jails then sell them same as NM takes k12 pictures then sells them to china via the Vaticans records , and NM DoD gay marriage and sept 11 also and the dudes a New Mexican not a Mexican and ET ain’t no New Mexican

2 million each spent by each nuclear family then current can pee on brains from space like USA does for technical deliveries from some to head as receiver

Who pays trumps COVID’s debts of 500 trillion not just texanus who also pays bush’s debts of relative wealth

Anyway doesn’t matter Scarface blowing kisses blowing away kids pope droning is dumb and they’re just buying time before gay marriage ruins the west so Vatican 2 pope ain’t bad basically you idiots hacked the popes airspace from crypto what kind of NM pile of crap let’s nukes get hacked from Linux Unix encryption? World doesn’t gay marriage and USA doesn’t pay for that

Yea Vatican kills wants to be new Swedish monarch with trump is princess for kingsman movie

I don’t know NM is Yemen really ? How many Trojan war fields are there ? Clergy are Spartans saying Trojans are crucified I’m gonna crucify you all ! Look at your son he’s dead I crucified you all ! Lmao that’s funny then hades is heaven and Jesus is Lucifer brought morning star wtf crap is that , why dont clergy just say they were around 5500 years ago as genitals removed turned into making better social workers then clergy had to not have sex as rule for employees

Anonymous

>>1291764
Keep telling yourself I'm an extremist.
You're gonna be real surprised.

>>1291757
>no response from anon who thinks 13 year olds aren't children
Shocker, probably too busy dilating

>>1291764
>not wanting to cut off childrens dicks is extremism
>normal people are pro cutting off kids dicks
lul what?

>>1291802
I don't have to tell myself that. You prove it without me saying anything at all.

>>1291886
>>1291899
I hate to be the one to tell you but normal people don't think or talk about trannies at all, ever.

>>1291910
I guarantee you normal people hate trannies when they see them irl

>>1291913
They don't see them IRL. There aren't that many of them like you think.

>>1291610
thank goodness /pol/tards usually get chased off of the boards and threads I actually care about