text
stringlengths 0
44.4k
|
---|
Institut f¨ ur Theoretische Physik, Universit¨ at Heidelbe rg, Philosophenweg 16-19, D-69120 |
Heidelberg, Germany |
Email:s.koers atthphys.uni-heidelberg.de |
Abstract: We construct new families of non-supersymmetric sourceles s type IIA AdS 4 |
vacua on those coset manifolds that also admit supersymmetr ic solutions. We investigate |
the spectrum of left-invariant modes and find that most, but n ot all, of the vacua are stable |
under these fluctuations. Generically, there are also no mas sless moduli. |
∗Postdoctoral Fellow FWO – Vlaanderen.Contents |
1. Introduction 1 |
2. Ansatz 3 |
3. Solutions 6 |
4. Stability analysis 11 |
5. Conclusions 15 |
A. SU(3)-structure 15 |
B. Type II supergravity 16 |
1. Introduction |
The reasons for studying AdS 4vacua of type IIA supergravity are twofold: first they are |
examples of flux compactifications away from the Calabi-Yau r egime, where all the moduli |
can be stabilized at the classical level. Secondly, they can serve as a gravity dual in the |
AdS4/CFT3-correspondence, which became the focus of attention due to recent progress |
in the understanding of the CFT-side as a Chern-Simons-matt er theory describing the |
world-volume of coinciding M2-branes [1]. |
Itismucheasiertofindsupersymmetricsolutionsofsupergr avityasthesupersymmetry |
conditions are simpler than the full equations of motion, wh ile at the same time there |
are general theorems stating that the former – supplemented with the Bianchi identities |
of the form fields – imply the latter [2, 3, 4, 5]. Although spec ial type IIA solutions |
that came from the reduction of supersymmetric M-theory vac ua were already known (see |
e.g. [6, 7, 8]), it was only in [3] that the supersymmetry cond itions for type IIA vacua with |
SU(3)-structure were first worked out in general. It was disc overed that there are natural |
solutions to these equations on the four coset manifolds G/Hthat have a nearly-K¨ ahler |
limit [9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14] (solutions on other manifolds ca n be found in e.g. [3, 15, 16]).1 |
To be precise these are the manifolds SU(2) ×SU(2),G2 |
SU(3),Sp(2) |
S(U(2)×U(1))andSU(3) |
U(1)×U(1).2 |
These solutions are particularly simple in the sense that bo th the SU(3)-structure, which |
determines the metric, as well as all the form fluxes can be exp anded in terms of forms |
which are left-invariant under the action of the group G. The supersymmetry equations |
1For an early appearance of these coset manifolds in the strin g literature see e.g. [17]. |
2See [18] for a review and a proof that these are the only homoge neous manifolds admitting a nearly- |
K¨ ahler geometry. |
– 1 –of [3] then reduce to purely algebraic equations and can be ex plicitly solved. Nevertheless, |
these solutions still have non-trivial geometric fluxes as o pposed to the Calabi-Yau or torus |
orientifolds of [15, 16]. Similarly to those papers it is pos sible to classically stabilize all |
left-invariant moduli [14]. Inspired by the AdS 4/CFT3correspondence more complicated |
type IIA solutions have in the meantime been proposed. The so lutions have a more generic |
form for the supersymmetry generators, called SU(3) ×SU(3)-structure [19], and are not |
left-invariant anymore [20, 21, 22, 23] (see also [24]). Sup ersymmetric AdS 4vacua in type |
IIB with SU(2)-structure have also been studied in [25, 26, 2 7, 28] and in particular it has |
been shown in [28] that also in this setup classical moduli st abilization is possible. |
At some point, however, supersymmetry has to be broken and we have to leave |
the safe haven of the supersymmetry conditions. In this pape r we construct new non- |
supersymmetric AdS 4vacua without source terms. This means that the more complic ated |
equations of motion of supergravity should be tackled direc tly3. In order to simplify the |
equations we use a specific ansatz: we start from a supersymme tric AdS 4solution and scan |
for non-supersymmetric solutions with the samegeometry (and thus SU(3)-structure), but |
withdifferent NSNS- and RR-fluxes. Moreover, we expand these form fields in t erms of the |
SU(3)-structure and its torsion classes. This may seem rest rictive at first, but it works for |
11D supergravity, where solutions like this have been found and are known as Englert-type |
solutions [31, 32, 33] (see [34] for a review). To be specific, for each supersymmetric M- |
theory solution of Freund-Rubin type (which means the M-the ory four-form flux has only |
legs along the external AdS 4space, i.e.F4=fvol4wherefis called the Freund-Rubin |
parameter) it is possible to construct a non-supersymmetri c solution with the same inter- |
nal geometry but with a different four-form flux. The modified fo ur-form of the Englert |
solution has then a non-zero internal part: ˆF4∝η†γm1m2m3m4ηdxm1m2m3m4, whereηis |
the 7D supersymmetry generator, and a different Freund-Rubin parameterfE=−(2/3)f. |
Also the Ricci scalar of the AdS 4space, and thus the effective 4D cosmological constant, |
differs:R4D,E= (5/6)R4D. In type IIA with non-zero Romans mass (so that there is no lif t |
to M-theory) non-supersymmetric solutions of this form hav e been found as well: for the |
nearly-K¨ ahler geometry in [35, 29, 36] and for the K¨ ahler- Einstein geometry in [35, 20, 37]. |
In this paper we show that this type of solutions is not restri cted to these limits and sys- |
tematically scan for them. Applying our ansatz to the coset m anifolds with nearly-K¨ ahler |
limit, mentioned above, we find that the most interesting man ifolds areSp(2) |
S(U(2)×U(1))and |
SU(3) |
U(1)×U(1), on which we find several families of non-supersymmetric AdS 4solutions. We |
also find some non-supersymmetric solutions in regimes of th e geometry that do not allow |
for a supersymmetric solution. |
These non-supersymmetric solutions are not necessarily st able. For instance, it is |
known that if there is more than one Killing spinor on the inte rnal manifold (which holds |
in particular for S7, the M-theory lift of CP3=Sp(2) |
S(U(2)×U(1))), the Englert-type solution is |
unstable [38]. We investigate stability of our solutions ag ainst left-invariant fluctuations. |
This means we calculate the spectrum of left-invariant mode s, and check for each mode |
3Anotherroute would be tofindsome alternative first-ordereq uations, which extendthe supersymmetry |
conditions in that they still automatically imply the full e quations of motion in certain non-supersymmetric |
cases, see e.g. [29, 30]. |
– 2 –whether the mass-squared is above the Breitenlohner-Freed man bound [39, 40]. This is not |
a complete stability analysis in that there could still be no n-left-invariant modes that are |
unstable. We do believe it provides a good first indication. I n particular, we find for the |
type IIA reduction of the Englert solution on S7that the unstable mode of [38] is among |
our left-invariant fluctuations and we find the exact same mas s-squared. |
These non-supersymmetric AdS 4vacua are interesting, because, provided they are |
stable, they should have a CFT-dual. For instance in [20] the CFT-dual for a non- |
supersymmetric K¨ ahler-Einstein solution on CP3was proposed. Furthermore, for phe- |
nomenologically more realistic vacua, supersymmetry-bre aking is essential. Really, one |
would like to construct classical solutions with a dS 4-factor, which are necessarily non- |
supersymmetric. Because of a series of no-go theorems – from very general to more specific: |
[41, 42, 43, 44, 45] – this is a very non-trivial task. For pape rs nevertheless addressing this |
problemsee[46,47,45,48,49,28]. Inthiscontext thelands capeofthenon-supersymmetric |
Subsets and Splits