Datasets:

chriswilde006
/

cases

+Case ID,Case Name,Date,Court,Judges,Legal Principles,Summary,Judgment Text,Citations,Outcome
+01234/2024,Manoj Kumar vs. State of Bihar,18-01-2024,Supreme Court of India,"Ranjan Gogoi, Deepak Gupta","Criminal law, bail, anticipatory bail",The petitioner sought anticipatory bail in a fraud case.,The court granted anticipatory bail with conditions.,NaN,Anticipatory bail granted.
+01234/2025,Rajesh Gupta vs. Indian Oil Corporation,22-01-2025,Supreme Court of India,"D.Y. Chandrachud, Hemant Gupta","Contract law, breach of contract, specific performance",The petitioner sought specific performance of a fuel supply contract.,The court ordered the corporation to fulfill its contractual obligations.,NaN,Specific performance ordered.
+01234/2026,Amit Desai vs. State of Madhya Pradesh,22-01-2026,Supreme Court of India,"A.M. Khanwilkar, Indu Malhotra","Environmental law, deforestation, restoration",The petitioner challenged illegal deforestation activities.,The court ordered restoration of the deforested area and penal action against violators.,NaN,Restoration and penalties ordered.
+1123/2022,National Insurance Co. Ltd. vs. Rajinder Kaur,20-01-2022,Supreme Court of India,"L. Nageswara Rao, S. Ravindra Bhat",Insurance claims and policy interpretation. Good faith in insurance contracts.,"The insurer challenged the claim settlement under a motor vehicle insurance policy. The Supreme Court upheld the claim, stating the insurer failed to prove breach of good faith by the claimant.","The claim was upheld, and the insurer was directed to pay the settlement.",N/A,Claim upheld; insurer to pay settlement.
+123/2018,Neha Sharma vs. Indian Railways,15-09-2018,Supreme Court of India,"A.K. Sikri, Ashok Bhushan","Compensation for accidents, liability of Indian Railways.",The petitioner sought compensation for injuries sustained in a train accident.,The court ordered Indian Railways to pay compensation to the petitioner.,NaN,Compensation awarded.
+123/2021,SpiceJet Ltd. vs. State of Karnataka,14-02-2021,Supreme Court of India,"Ashok Bhushan, M.R. Shah",Aviation regulations and compliance. State vs. central regulatory authority.,"The petitioner challenged state regulatory orders affecting its operations. The Supreme Court upheld the central authority's jurisdiction, emphasizing the central government's role in aviation regulation.",The state orders were set aside in favor of central regulation.,N/A,State orders set aside; central regulation upheld.
+123/2022,Mahindra & Mahindra vs. State of Madhya Pradesh,13-07-2022,Supreme Court of India,"D.Y. Chandrachud, Surya Kant",Corporate governance and compliance. Financial disclosure and penalties.,"The petitioner challenged penalties for non-compliance with financial disclosure requirements. The Supreme Court upheld the penalties, reinforcing the importance of transparency.",The penalties were upheld.,N/A,Penalties upheld.
+1234/2021,Sunil Kumar vs. State of Maharashtra,18-04-2021,Supreme Court of India,"D.Y. Chandrachud, M.R. Shah","Criminal law, bail applications, principles of bail.",The petitioner sought bail in a criminal case.,"The court granted bail, citing lack of evidence for continued detention.",NaN,Bail granted.
+12345/2018,Priya Sharma vs. University of Mumbai,18-10-2018,Supreme Court of India,"A.K. Sikri, Ashok Bhushan","Education law, examination disputes, interpretation of university regulations.",The petitioner challenged her examination results.,The court ordered a re-evaluation of the petitioner's answer sheets.,NaN,Re-evaluation ordered.
+12345/2024,Anita Reddy vs. State of Karnataka,22-02-2024,Supreme Court of India,"U.U. Lalit, Vineet Saran","Family law, divorce, alimony",The petitioner sought increased alimony in a divorce settlement.,The court ordered an increase in alimony.,NaN,Alimony increased.
+12345/2025,Geeta Devi vs. State of Himachal Pradesh,15-02-2025,Supreme Court of India,"N.V. Ramana, S.A. Bobde","Land law, encroachment, eviction",The petitioner challenged her eviction from alleged encroached land.,The court upheld the eviction order.,NaN,Eviction order upheld.
+12345/2026,Rajesh Malhotra vs. State of Gujarat,15-02-2026,Supreme Court of India,"R.F. Nariman, B.R. Gavai","Tax law, GST compliance, penalty",The petitioner challenged a penalty imposed for non-compliance with GST laws.,The court upheld the penalty.,NaN,Penalty upheld.
+1256/2019,Rajesh Kumar vs. Union of India,15-04-2019,Supreme Court of India,"Ranjan Gogoi, Deepak Gupta",Challenge to the constitutional validity of a statute. Retrospective application of laws.,"The petitioner challenged the retrospective application of a tax amendment. The Supreme Court upheld the validity of the retrospective law, emphasizing the legislative intent and public interest.","The court dismissed the petition, stating that retrospective application was justified.",N/A,Petition dismissed; law upheld.
+231/2019,Sahara India vs. SEBI,25-03-2019,Supreme Court of India,"A.K. Sikri, Ashok Bhushan",Securities regulations and compliance. Investor protection in financial markets.,"The petitioner challenged SEBI's order directing repayment to investors. The Supreme Court upheld SEBI's order, emphasizing the importance of investor protection and regulatory compliance.","The repayment order was upheld, and the company was directed to comply.",N/A,Repayment order upheld; compliance directed.
+234/2020,Flipkart vs. State of Karnataka,15-01-2020,Supreme Court of India,"S.A. Nazeer, Hemant Gupta",E-commerce regulations and consumer protection. Compliance with state laws.,"The petitioner challenged state regulations affecting e-commerce operations. The Supreme Court upheld the state regulations, emphasizing the importance of consumer protection in e-commerce.",The state regulations were upheld.,N/A,State regulations upheld.
+234/2021,HDFC Bank Ltd. vs. State of Maharashtra,29-04-2021,Supreme Court of India,"A.K. Sikri, Ashok Bhushan",Banking regulations and compliance. Loan disbursement and penalties.,"The petitioner challenged penalties for non-compliance with loan disbursement norms. The Supreme Court upheld the penalties, emphasizing regulatory compliance in banking.",The penalties were upheld.,N/A,Penalties upheld.
+234/2022,Bank of Baroda vs. State of Gujarat,07-05-2022,Supreme Court of India,"A.K. Sikri, Ashok Bhushan",Banking regulations and compliance. Interest rate regulations and penalties.,"The petitioner challenged penalties for non-compliance with interest rate regulations. The Supreme Court upheld the penalties, reinforcing the importance of regulatory compliance.",The penalties were upheld.,N/A,Penalties upheld.
+234/2022,Ashok Kumar vs. State Bank of India,25-02-2022,Supreme Court of India,"L. Nageswara Rao, S. Ravindra Bhat","Banking law, loan defaults, recovery proceedings.",The petitioner challenged the recovery proceedings initiated by the bank for a loan default.,"The court stayed the recovery proceedings, ordering a review of the loan agreement.",NaN,Recovery proceedings stayed.
+2345/2022,Ajay Gupta vs. Punjab National Bank,10-03-2022,Supreme Court of India,"L. Nageswara Rao, S. Ravindra Bhat","Banking law, fraud disputes, recovery of funds.",The petitioner challenged the bank's refusal to refund money lost due to fraudulent transactions.,The court ordered the bank to refund the disputed amount.,NaN,Refund ordered.
+23456/2022,Rajesh Gupta vs. Indian Oil Corporation,22-04-2022,Supreme Court of India,"L. Nageswara Rao, S. Ravindra Bhat","Contract law, breach of contract, specific performance.",The petitioner sought specific performance of a fuel supply contract.,The court ordered the corporation to fulfill its contractual obligations.,NaN,Specific performance ordered.
+23456/2024,Vikas Jain vs. State of Gujarat,15-03-2024,Supreme Court of India,"D.Y. Chandrachud, Hemant Gupta","Environmental law, pollution control, regulatory compliance",The petitioner challenged industrial pollution in his locality.,The court ordered stringent regulatory compliance and pollution control measures.,NaN,Pollution control measures ordered.
+23456/2025,Sanjay Singh vs. State of Kerala,20-03-2025,Supreme Court of India,"A.M. Khanwilkar, Indu Malhotra","Family law, child custody, welfare of the child",The petitioner sought custody of his minor child.,"The court granted custody to the petitioner, considering the welfare of the child.",NaN,Custody granted.
+312/2018,Adani Power Ltd. vs. State of Gujarat,20-11-2018,Supreme Court of India,"R.F. Nariman, Navin Sinha",Dispute over power tariffs. Regulatory authority and tariff adjustments.,"The petitioner challenged the regulatory authority's decision on power tariff adjustments. The Supreme Court upheld the authority's decision, affirming the tariffs as reasonable and justified.",The tariff adjustments were upheld.,N/A,Tariff adjustments upheld.
+334/2021,Larsen & Toubro Ltd. vs. State of Tamil Nadu,09-04-2021,Supreme Court of India,"A.M. Sapre, Indu Malhotra",Contract disputes in public projects. Performance guarantees and penalties.,"The petitioner disputed a penalty imposed for delay in a public project. The Supreme Court upheld the penalty, highlighting the importance of timely completion of public projects.","The penalty was upheld, and the company was directed to complete the project.",N/A,Penalty upheld; project completion directed.
+342/2023,Amazon India vs. Future Retail Ltd.,25-05-2023,Supreme Court of India,"N.V. Ramana, Krishna Murari",Corporate disputes and arbitration. Enforcement of arbitration awards.,"The petitioner sought enforcement of an arbitration award against Future Retail. The Supreme Court upheld the award, emphasizing the enforceability of arbitration decisions in corporate disputes.","The arbitration award was upheld, and enforcement was directed.",N/A,Arbitration award upheld; enforcement directed.
+345/2018,Meena Devi vs. State of Uttar Pradesh,19-12-2018,Supreme Court of India,"A.K. Sikri, Ashok Bhushan",Compensation under land acquisition laws. Fair market value assessment.,"The petitioner challenged the compensation awarded under the Land Acquisition Act, claiming it was below market value. The Supreme Court directed a reassessment of the compensation based on current market value.",The compensation was ordered to be reassessed.,N/A,Reassessment of compensation ordered.
+345/2020,Axis Bank Ltd. vs. State of Kerala,14-11-2020,Supreme Court of India,"N.V. Ramana, Vineet Saran",Banking regulations and compliance. KYC norms and penalties.,"The petitioner challenged penalties for non-compliance with KYC norms. The Supreme Court upheld the penalties, reinforcing the importance of compliance in banking operations.",The penalties were upheld.,N/A,Penalties upheld.
+345/2021,Union Bank of India vs. State of Rajasthan,09-11-2021,Supreme Court of India,"S.A. Bobde, A.S. Bopanna",Banking regulations and compliance. Basel norms and penalties.,"The petitioner challenged penalties for non-compliance with Basel norms. The Supreme Court upheld the penalties, emphasizing regulatory compliance in banking operations.",The penalties were upheld.,N/A,Penalties upheld.
+345/2022,Hindustan Unilever Ltd. vs. State of Maharashtra,05-05-2022,Supreme Court of India,"D.Y. Chandrachud, A.S. Bopanna",Consumer protection laws and corporate liability. Misleading advertisements and penalties.,"The company challenged penalties for misleading advertisements. The Supreme Court upheld the penalties, emphasizing the importance of truthful advertising.",The penalties were upheld.,N/A,Penalties upheld.
+345/2022,Infosys Ltd. vs. State of Maharashtra,20-12-2022,Supreme Court of India,"D.Y. Chandrachud, B.V. Nagarathna",Corporate governance and compliance. Audit requirements and penalties.,"The petitioner challenged penalties for non-compliance with corporate governance norms. The Supreme Court upheld the penalties, emphasizing the importance of audit compliance.",The penalties were upheld.,N/A,Penalties upheld.
+3456/2021,Anil Verma vs. Municipal Corporation of Mumbai,12-09-2021,Supreme Court of India,"D.Y. Chandrachud, M.R. Shah","Municipal law, property disputes, interpretation of municipal regulations.",The petitioner challenged the demolition of his property by the Municipal Corporation.,"The court ordered a stay on the demolition, citing procedural lapses.",NaN,Demolition stayed.
+34567/2023,Arun Sharma vs. Bharat Petroleum Corporation,15-05-2023,Supreme Court of India,"D.Y. Chandrachud, Hemant Gupta","Contract law, breach of contract, specific performance",The petitioner sought specific performance of a supply contract.,The court ordered the corporation to fulfill its contractual obligations.,NaN,Specific performance ordered.
+34567/2024,Neha Kapoor vs. State of Madhya Pradesh,18-04-2024,Supreme Court of India,"N.V. Ramana, S.A. Bobde","Education law, admission policy, reservation",The petitioner challenged the reservation policy in educational admissions.,The court upheld the reservation policy.,NaN,Reservation policy upheld.
+34567/2025,Nikhil Kumar vs. State of Andhra Pradesh,18-04-2025,Supreme Court of India,"R.F. Nariman, B.R. Gavai","Administrative law, service matter, seniority",The petitioner challenged his seniority in the service cadre.,The court ordered a review of the seniority list.,NaN,Review of seniority list ordered.
+412/2022,Bajaj Auto Ltd. vs. Union of India,12-10-2022,Supreme Court of India,"L. Nageswara Rao, Hemant Gupta",Import duties and customs regulations. Interpretation of trade agreements.,"The petitioner challenged the import duties imposed under a trade agreement. The Supreme Court upheld the duties, interpreting the trade agreement in favor of the government's stance on imports.",The import duties were upheld.,N/A,Import duties upheld.
+453/2020,ITC Ltd. vs. State of West Bengal,17-04-2020,Supreme Court of India,"L. Nageswara Rao, Hemant Gupta",Corporate liability for environmental pollution. Compliance with state pollution control norms.,"The company challenged a penalty for environmental pollution. The Supreme Court upheld the penalty, emphasizing the importance of corporate responsibility towards the environment.",The penalty was upheld.,N/A,Penalty upheld.
+456/2019,Kotak Mahindra Bank vs. State of Tamil Nadu,25-06-2019,Supreme Court of India,"S.A. Nazeer, Hemant Gupta",Banking regulations and compliance. Asset classification and penalties.,"The petitioner challenged penalties for improper asset classification. The Supreme Court upheld the penalties, emphasizing the need for regulatory compliance.",The penalties were upheld.,N/A,Penalties upheld.
+456/2020,Federal Bank vs. State of Kerala,23-03-2020,Supreme Court of India,"S.A. Nazeer, Hemant Gupta",Banking regulations and compliance. AML norms and penalties.,"The petitioner challenged penalties for non-compliance with AML norms. The Supreme Court upheld the penalties, reinforcing regulatory compliance in banking operations.",The penalties were upheld.,N/A,Penalties upheld.
+456/2021,Suresh Prasad vs. Bharat Petroleum Corporation Ltd.,22-07-2021,Supreme Court of India,"D.Y. Chandrachud, M.R. Shah","Contract law, breach of contract, specific performance.",The petitioner sought specific performance of a fuel supply contract.,The court ordered the corporation to fulfill its contractual obligations.,NaN,Specific performance ordered.
+456/2022,Vodafone Idea Ltd. vs. Union of India,01-06-2022,Supreme Court of India,"N.V. Ramana, Krishna Murari",Telecom regulations and compliance. Adjusted gross revenue (AGR) dues.,"The petitioner challenged the calculation of AGR dues by the Department of Telecommunications. The Supreme Court upheld the government's calculation, emphasizing the need for compliance with telecom regulations.",The AGR dues calculation was upheld.,N/A,AGR dues upheld.
+456/2023,Tata Motors Ltd. vs. State of West Bengal,03-03-2023,Supreme Court of India,"S.A. Bobde, B.R. Gavai",Industrial disputes and compensation. State liability in land acquisition for industrial purposes.,Tata Motors challenged the state's liability in compensating for land acquired for an industrial project. The Supreme Court ruled that the state was liable to compensate for the acquired land based on fair market value.,The state was ordered to compensate based on market value.,N/A,Compensation based on market value ordered.
+45678/2023,Kiran Desai vs. State of Maharashtra,22-06-2023,Supreme Court of India,"L. Nageswara Rao, S. Ravindra Bhat","Constitutional law, freedom of speech, sedition",The petitioner challenged the constitutional validity of sedition laws.,The court upheld the sedition law with specific guidelines for its application.,NaN,Sedition law upheld with guidelines.
+45678/2024,Anil Khanna vs. State of Tamil Nadu,20-05-2024,Supreme Court of India,"A.M. Khanwilkar, Indu Malhotra","Tax law, income tax, reassessment",The petitioner challenged the reassessment of his income tax returns.,The court quashed the reassessment order.,NaN,Reassessment order quashed.
+45678/2025,Arvind Patel vs. State of Chhattisgarh,22-05-2025,Supreme Court of India,"Ashok Bhushan, Vineet Saran","Labour law, wrongful dismissal, reinstatement",The petitioner challenged his wrongful dismissal from service.,The court ordered reinstatement with back wages.,NaN,Reinstatement with back wages ordered.
+543/2018,HDFC Bank Ltd. vs. State of Gujarat,19-05-2018,Supreme Court of India,"S.A. Nazeer, Sanjiv Khanna",Banking regulations and compliance. Consumer protection in banking services.,"The bank challenged a consumer protection ruling imposing a fine for service deficiency. The Supreme Court upheld the fine, reinforcing consumer rights in banking services.","The fine was upheld, and the bank was directed to improve services.",N/A,Fine upheld; service improvement directed.
+543/2021,Hindalco Industries Ltd. vs. State of Maharashtra,11-03-2021,Supreme Court of India,"L. Nageswara Rao, S. Ravindra Bhat",Environmental regulations and corporate liability. Compliance with pollution control norms.,"The petitioner challenged penalties for non-compliance with environmental regulations. The Supreme Court upheld the penalties, emphasizing corporate responsibility towards the environment.",The penalties were upheld.,N/A,Penalties upheld.
+567/2019,Bharti Airtel vs. State of Uttar Pradesh,15-05-2019,Supreme Court of India,"Ranjan Gogoi, Deepak Gupta",Telecom regulations and compliance. License fees and penalties.,"The petitioner challenged penalties for late payment of license fees. The Supreme Court upheld the penalties, emphasizing timely compliance with regulatory requirements.",The penalties were upheld.,N/A,Penalties upheld.
+567/2019,Arun Sharma vs. Delhi Development Authority,10-05-2019,Supreme Court of India,"S.A. Bobde, L. Nageswara Rao",Dispute over land allotment by the Delhi Development Authority (DDA). Interpretation of DDA regulations.,The petitioner challenged the cancellation of land allotment by DDA.,"The court ordered the restoration of the allotment, deeming the cancellation arbitrary.",NaN,Allotment restored.
+567/2020,RBL Bank vs. State of Tamil Nadu,14-09-2020,Supreme Court of India,"N.V. Ramana, Krishna Murari",Banking regulations and compliance. Operational risk management and penalties.,"The petitioner challenged penalties for non-compliance with operational risk management norms. The Supreme Court upheld the penalties, emphasizing regulatory compliance.",The penalties were upheld.,N/A,Penalties upheld.
+567/2020,Mohan Singh vs. National Highways Authority of India,12-10-2020,Supreme Court of India,"N.V. Ramana, Krishna Murari","Land acquisition, compensation disputes, interpretation of land acquisition laws.",The petitioner challenged the compensation awarded for land acquired for highway construction.,The court ordered an increase in the compensation amount.,NaN,Compensation increased.
+567/2021,DLF Ltd. vs. Union of India,13-07-2021,Supreme Court of India,"Ashok Bhushan, R. Subhash Reddy",Real estate regulations and compliance. Consumer protection in real estate transactions.,"The petitioner challenged penalties imposed for non-compliance with real estate regulations. The Supreme Court upheld the penalties, reinforcing consumer protection in real estate transactions.",The penalties were upheld.,N/A,Penalties upheld.
+567/2021,ICICI Bank Ltd. vs. State of West Bengal,30-09-2021,Supreme Court of India,"N.V. Ramana, Krishna Murari",Banking regulations and compliance. NPA recognition and penalties.,"The petitioner challenged penalties for non-compliance with NPA recognition norms. The Supreme Court upheld the penalties, reinforcing the importance of regulatory compliance.",The penalties were upheld.,N/A,Penalties upheld.
+5678/2019,Alok Sharma vs. Ministry of Environment,14-08-2019,Supreme Court of India,"S.A. Bobde, L. Nageswara Rao","Environmental law, pollution control, interpretation of environmental regulations.",The petitioner challenged the environmental clearance granted for a construction project.,"The court stayed the clearance, ordering a review of the environmental impact assessment.",NaN,Clearance stayed.
+56789/2023,Mohan Lal vs. State of Rajasthan,10-07-2023,Supreme Court of India,"N.V. Ramana, S.A. Bobde","Criminal law, murder, self-defense",The petitioner argued self-defense in a murder case.,The court acquitted the petitioner on grounds of self-defense.,NaN,Acquittal on self-defense.
+56789/2024,Rekha Sharma vs. State of Uttar Pradesh,25-06-2024,Supreme Court of India,"R.F. Nariman, B.R. Gavai","Civil procedure, limitation period, condonation of delay",The petitioner sought condonation of delay in filing a suit.,The court condoned the delay and allowed the suit to proceed.,NaN,Delay condoned.
+56789/2025,Anjali Sharma vs. State of Odisha,25-06-2025,Supreme Court of India,"A.K. Sikri, S. Abdul Nazeer","Human rights, custodial violence, compensation",The petitioner sought compensation for custodial violence.,The court awarded compensation to the petitioner.,NaN,Compensation awarded.
+654/2021,Vedanta Ltd. vs. State of Odisha,11-11-2021,Supreme Court of India,"N.V. Ramana, Surya Kant",Mining regulations and environmental compliance. Corporate responsibility in resource extraction.,"The petitioner challenged environmental penalties imposed for mining activities. The Supreme Court upheld the penalties, emphasizing corporate responsibility in resource extraction.","The penalties were upheld, and the company was directed to ensure compliance.",N/A,Penalties upheld; compliance directed.
+673/2020,Infosys Ltd. vs. Karnataka State Pollution Control Board,23-11-2020,Supreme Court of India,"R.F. Nariman, Aniruddha Bose",Environmental regulations and corporate liability. Compliance with pollution control norms.,"The petitioner challenged a penalty imposed for non-compliance with pollution control norms. The Supreme Court upheld the penalty, emphasizing the importance of adhering to environmental regulations.","The penalty was upheld, and the company was directed to comply with norms.",N/A,Penalty upheld; compliance directed.
+674/2018,Hero MotoCorp Ltd. vs. Union of India,29-11-2018,Supreme Court of India,"R. Banumathi, A.S. Bopanna",Taxation on automobile sales. Interpretation of tax statutes.,"The petitioner challenged an additional tax on automobile sales. The Supreme Court upheld the tax, interpreting the statutory provisions in favor of the government.",The additional tax was upheld.,N/A,Additional tax upheld.
+678/2018,Seema Devi vs. Life Insurance Corporation of India,20-11-2018,Supreme Court of India,"A.K. Sikri, Ashok Bhushan","Insurance claims, policy interpretation, contractual disputes.",The petitioner sought settlement of an insurance claim.,The court ordered the insurer to settle the claim.,NaN,Claim settled.
+678/2019,Samsung Electronics vs. State of Delhi,17-09-2019,Supreme Court of India,"R. Banumathi, A.S. Bopanna",Consumer protection and product liability. Warranty obligations and penalties.,"The petitioner challenged penalties imposed for breach of warranty obligations. The Supreme Court upheld the penalties, reinforcing consumer protection and product liability principles.",The penalties were upheld.,N/A,Penalties upheld.
+678/2020,ITC Ltd. vs. State of West Bengal,12-08-2020,Supreme Court of India,"S.A. Bobde, A.S. Bopanna",Corporate tax disputes. Goods and Services Tax (GST) compliance.,"The petitioner challenged the imposition of GST penalties. The Supreme Court upheld the penalties, reinforcing the importance of GST compliance.",The penalties were upheld.,N/A,Penalties upheld.
+678/2021,State Bank of India vs. State of Bihar,19-07-2021,Supreme Court of India,"L. Nageswara Rao, S. Ravindra Bhat",Banking regulations and compliance. Loan recovery and penalties.,"The petitioner challenged penalties for non-compliance with loan recovery norms. The Supreme Court upheld the penalties, emphasizing the need for regulatory compliance.",The penalties were upheld.,N/A,Penalties upheld.
+67890/2023,Seema Singh vs. Union of India,18-08-2023,Supreme Court of India,"A.M. Khanwilkar, Indu Malhotra","Employment law, wrongful termination, reinstatement",The petitioner challenged her wrongful termination from a government job.,The court ordered reinstatement with back pay.,NaN,Reinstatement with back pay.
+67890/2025,Vivek Bhalla vs. State of Uttarakhand,20-07-2025,Supreme Court of India,"Ranjan Gogoi, Deepak Gupta","Election law, electoral malpractice, disqualification",The petitioner challenged the disqualification of an elected representative on grounds of electoral malpractice.,The court upheld the disqualification.,NaN,Disqualification upheld.
+764/2020,Maruti Suzuki India Ltd. vs. State of Haryana,15-12-2020,Supreme Court of India,"U.U. Lalit, Vineet Saran",Industrial safety regulations. Employer's liability for workplace safety.,"The petitioner challenged penalties imposed for violations of industrial safety regulations. The Supreme Court upheld the penalties, underscoring the employer's responsibility for workplace safety.","The penalties were upheld, and the company was directed to improve safety measures.",N/A,Penalties upheld; safety measures directed.
+784/2020,Adani Power Ltd. vs. State of Gujarat,18-02-2020,Supreme Court of India,"A.M. Khanwilkar, Dinesh Maheshwari",Regulatory compliance in the power sector. Tariff adjustments and contractual obligations.,"The petitioner challenged a regulatory order on tariff adjustments. The Supreme Court upheld the order, emphasizing the need for compliance with regulatory guidelines.",The tariff adjustment order was upheld.,N/A,Order upheld; compliance directed.
+789/2017,Bharti Airtel Ltd. vs. Union of India,29-10-2017,Supreme Court of India,"Dipak Misra, A.M. Khanwilkar",Taxation on telecom services. Interpretation of statutory provisions.,"The petitioner challenged the imposition of service tax on telecom services. The Supreme Court upheld the tax, interpreting the statutory provisions in favor of the government's stance on telecom taxation.",The service tax imposition was upheld.,N/A,Service tax upheld.
+789/2018,Reliance Communications vs. State of Maharashtra,27-06-2018,Supreme Court of India,"A.K. Sikri, S. Abdul Nazeer",Telecom regulations and compliance. Spectrum allocation and penalties.,"The petitioner challenged penalties for non-compliance with telecom regulations. The Supreme Court upheld the penalties, stressing the importance of regulatory compliance in spectrum allocation.",The penalties were upheld.,N/A,Penalties upheld.
+789/2020,Vijay Kumar vs. Municipal Corporation of Delhi,15-03-2020,Supreme Court of India,"N.V. Ramana, Krishna Murari","Municipal law, property tax disputes, interpretation of property tax laws.",The petitioner disputed the property tax assessment by the Municipal Corporation.,"The court ordered a reassessment of the property tax, finding discrepancies in the original assessment.",NaN,Reassessment ordered.
+789/2021,HCL Technologies vs. State of Haryana,18-06-2021,Supreme Court of India,"N.V. Ramana, S. Ravindra Bhat",Corporate governance and compliance. Disclosure requirements and penalties.,"The petitioner challenged penalties for non-compliance with disclosure norms. The Supreme Court upheld the penalties, emphasizing the need for transparency in corporate governance.",The penalties were upheld.,N/A,Penalties upheld.
+789/2022,Wipro Ltd. vs. State of Karnataka,29-10-2022,Supreme Court of India,"S.A. Bobde, B.R. Gavai",Corporate tax disputes. Interpretation of tax statutes.,"The petitioner challenged an additional corporate tax imposed by the state. The Supreme Court upheld the tax, interpreting the statutory provisions in favor of the state government.",The additional corporate tax was upheld.,N/A,Additional tax upheld.
+789/2022,Punjab National Bank vs. State of Haryana,22-08-2022,Supreme Court of India,"R.F. Nariman, Navin Sinha",Banking regulations and compliance. Fraud detection and penalties.,"The petitioner challenged penalties for non-compliance with fraud detection norms. The Supreme Court upheld the penalties, emphasizing the importance of regulatory compliance.",The penalties were upheld.,N/A,Penalties upheld.
+7890/2020,Ramesh Kumar vs. Indian Railways,25-11-2020,Supreme Court of India,"N.V. Ramana, Krishna Murari","Compensation for accidents, liability of Indian Railways.",The petitioner sought compensation for injuries sustained in a train accident.,The court ordered Indian Railways to pay compensation to the petitioner.,NaN,Compensation awarded.
+78901/2023,Rahul Verma vs. State of Punjab,05-09-2023,Supreme Court of India,"R.F. Nariman, B.R. Gavai","Property law, adverse possession, title dispute",The petitioner claimed adverse possession over disputed land.,The court dismissed the claim of adverse possession.,NaN,Claim dismissed.
+78901/2024,Suresh Gupta vs. State of Haryana,15-08-2024,Supreme Court of India,"A.K. Sikri, S. Abdul Nazeer","Consumer protection, defective goods, compensation",The petitioner sought compensation for defective goods purchased.,The court awarded compensation to the petitioner.,NaN,Compensation awarded.
+78901/2025,Kavita Agarwal vs. State of Telangana,18-08-2025,Supreme Court of India,"U.U. Lalit, Vineet Saran","Consumer protection, misleading advertisements, penalty",The petitioner sought action against a company for misleading advertisements.,The court imposed a penalty on the company and ordered corrective advertisements.,NaN,Penalty and corrective advertisements ordered.
+874/2021,Kumar Builders vs. Ravi Prasad,11-08-2021,Supreme Court of India,"D.Y. Chandrachud, M.R. Shah",Contractual disputes in real estate. Specific performance of contract.,"The respondent sought specific performance of a real estate contract. The Supreme Court upheld the lower court's decision, granting specific performance and ordering the developer to complete the project as per the contract.",The court ordered the developer to fulfill the contractual obligations.,N/A,Specific performance ordered.
+876/2020,TCS vs. State of Tamil Nadu,13-07-2020,Supreme Court of India,"A.M. Khanwilkar, Dinesh Maheshwari",Corporate tax disputes. Tax incentives and exemptions.,"The petitioner challenged the withdrawal of tax incentives granted by the state. The Supreme Court upheld the withdrawal, emphasizing the state's authority in granting and withdrawing tax incentives.",The withdrawal of tax incentives was upheld.,N/A,Withdrawal of tax incentives upheld.
+890/2019,Tata Motors Ltd. vs. State of Gujarat,05-10-2019,Supreme Court of India,"Arun Mishra, Vineet Saran",Environmental regulations and compliance. Emission norms and penalties.,"The petitioner challenged penalties for non-compliance with emission norms. The Supreme Court upheld the penalties, emphasizing the importance of environmental compliance.",The penalties were upheld.,N/A,Penalties upheld.
+890/2019,Reema Verma vs. Delhi University,05-11-2019,Supreme Court of India,"S.A. Bobde, Deepak Gupta","Education law, admission disputes, interpretation of university regulations.",The petitioner challenged her denial of admission to a postgraduate program.,"The court ordered the university to admit the petitioner, citing procedural lapses.",NaN,Admission granted.
+890/2020,IDFC First Bank vs. State of Karnataka,28-05-2020,Supreme Court of India,"A.M. Khanwilkar, Dinesh Maheshwari",Banking regulations and compliance. Customer data protection and penalties.,"The petitioner challenged penalties for non-compliance with customer data protection norms. The Supreme Court upheld the penalties, emphasizing regulatory compliance.",The penalties were upheld.,N/A,Penalties upheld.
+890/2021,Jio Payments Bank vs. State of Madhya Pradesh,01-12-2021,Supreme Court of India,"D.Y. Chandrachud, Surya Kant",Banking regulations and compliance. Digital banking norms and penalties.,"The petitioner challenged penalties for non-compliance with digital banking norms. The Supreme Court upheld the penalties, emphasizing regulatory compliance.",The penalties were upheld.,N/A,Penalties upheld.
+89012/2023,Pooja Gupta vs. Delhi Development Authority,12-10-2023,Supreme Court of India,"Ashok Bhushan, Vineet Saran","Land acquisition, compensation, fair market value",The petitioner sought higher compensation for land acquired by the DDA.,The court ordered reassessment of compensation at fair market value.,NaN,Reassessment of compensation ordered.
+89012/2024,Ramesh Chand vs. State of Jharkhand,22-09-2024,Supreme Court of India,"Ranjan Gogoi, Deepak Gupta","Labour law, minimum wages, compliance",The petitioner challenged the non-compliance of minimum wage laws by his employer.,The court ordered the employer to comply with minimum wage laws and pay arrears.,NaN,Compliance with minimum wage laws ordered.
+89012/2025,Rohit Verma vs. State of Punjab,22-09-2025,Supreme Court of India,"D.Y. Chandrachud, Hemant Gupta","Labour law, workplace harassment, compensation",The petitioner sought compensation for workplace harassment.,The court awarded compensation to the petitioner.,NaN,Compensation awarded.
+898/2021,Bharat Petroleum Corp. Ltd. vs. State of Tamil Nadu,15-09-2021,Supreme Court of India,"Ashok Bhushan, R. Subhash Reddy",Regulatory compliance in the petroleum sector. State vs. central regulatory authority.,"The company challenged state regulatory orders affecting its operations. The Supreme Court upheld the state orders, emphasizing the state's regulatory authority in specific circumstances.",The state orders were upheld.,N/A,State orders upheld.
+901/2021,Hero MotoCorp Ltd. vs. State of Rajasthan,22-03-2021,Supreme Court of India,"A.M. Khanwilkar, Sanjiv Khanna",Consumer protection and product liability. Recall obligations and penalties.,"The petitioner challenged penalties for non-compliance with product recall obligations. The Supreme Court upheld the penalties, emphasizing consumer protection.",The penalties were upheld.,N/A,Penalties upheld.
+901/2022,Paytm Payments Bank vs. State of Karnataka,11-04-2022,Supreme Court of India,"A.K. Sikri, Ashok Bhushan",Banking regulations and compliance. Cybersecurity norms and penalties.,"The petitioner challenged penalties for non-compliance with cybersecurity norms. The Supreme Court upheld the penalties, emphasizing regulatory compliance.",The penalties were upheld.,N/A,Penalties upheld.
+90123/2023,Sanjay Aggarwal vs. Municipal Corporation of Delhi,15-11-2023,Supreme Court of India,"A.K. Sikri, S. Abdul Nazeer","Municipal law, unauthorized construction, demolition",The petitioner challenged the demolition of his property by the MCD.,The court ordered a stay on demolition and called for a review of the authorization.,NaN,Stay on demolition ordered.
+90123/2024,Sunita Agarwal vs. State of Assam,12-10-2024,Supreme Court of India,"U.U. Lalit, Vineet Saran","Public interest litigation, environmental protection, industrial pollution",The petitioner filed a PIL for environmental protection against industrial pollution.,The court ordered stringent pollution control measures and regular monitoring.,NaN,Pollution control measures ordered.
+90123/2025,Vandana Kumari vs. State of Haryana,12-10-2025,Supreme Court of India,"N.V. Ramana, S.A. Bobde","Property law, ancestral property, partition",The petitioner sought partition of ancestral property.,The court ordered partition as per legal heirs' entitlement.,NaN,Partition ordered.
+902/2022,Axis Bank vs. State of Maharashtra,15-05-2022,Supreme Court of India,"A.M. Khanwilkar, Dinesh Maheshwari",Banking regulations and compliance. Anti-money laundering norms and penalties.,"The petitioner challenged penalties for non-compliance with anti-money laundering norms. The Supreme Court upheld the penalties, emphasizing regulatory compliance.",The penalties were upheld.,N/A,Penalties upheld.
+903/2022,ICICI Bank vs. State of Gujarat,20-06-2022,Supreme Court of India,"N.V. Ramana, Krishna Murari",Banking regulations and compliance. Loan disbursement norms and penalties.,"The petitioner challenged penalties for non-compliance with loan disbursement norms. The Supreme Court upheld the penalties, emphasizing regulatory compliance.",The penalties were upheld.,N/A,Penalties upheld.
+904/2022,HDFC Bank vs. State of Tamil Nadu,25-07-2022,Supreme Court of India,"S.A. Nazeer, Hemant Gupta",Banking regulations and compliance. Know Your Customer (KYC) norms and penalties.,"The petitioner challenged penalties for non-compliance with KYC norms. The Supreme Court upheld the penalties, emphasizing regulatory compliance.",The penalties were upheld.,N/A,Penalties upheld.
+906/2022,Canara Bank vs. State of Karnataka,10-09-2022,Supreme Court of India,"S.A. Bobde, A.S. Bopanna",Banking regulations and compliance. Credit card issuance norms and penalties.,"The petitioner challenged penalties for non-compliance with credit card issuance norms. The Supreme Court upheld the penalties, emphasizing regulatory compliance.",The penalties were upheld.,N/A,Penalties upheld.
+907/2022,Union Bank of India vs. State of West Bengal,15-10-2022,Supreme Court of India,"A.K. Sikri, Ashok Bhushan",Banking regulations and compliance. Fraud detection and penalties.,"The petitioner challenged penalties for non-compliance with fraud detection norms. The Supreme Court upheld the penalties, emphasizing regulatory compliance.",The penalties were upheld.,N/A,Penalties upheld.
+908/2022,SBI vs. State of Rajasthan,20-11-2022,Supreme Court of India,"N.V. Ramana, S. Ravindra Bhat",Banking regulations and compliance. Corporate governance norms and penalties.,"The petitioner challenged penalties for non-compliance with corporate governance norms. The Supreme Court upheld the penalties, emphasizing regulatory compliance.",The penalties were upheld.,N/A,Penalties upheld.
+911/2022,Bank of India vs. State of Chhattisgarh,10-02-2022,Supreme Court of India,"R.F. Nariman, Navin Sinha",Banking regulations and compliance. Loan recovery norms and penalties.,"The petitioner challenged penalties for non-compliance with loan recovery norms. The Supreme Court upheld the penalties, emphasizing regulatory compliance.",The penalties were upheld.,N/A,Penalties upheld.
+912/2022,Bank of Maharashtra vs. State of Bihar,15-03-2022,Supreme Court of India,"S.A. Nazeer, Hemant Gupta",Banking regulations and compliance. Branch expansion norms and penalties.,"The petitioner challenged penalties for non-compliance with branch expansion norms. The Supreme Court upheld the penalties, emphasizing regulatory compliance.",The penalties were upheld.,N/A,Penalties upheld.
+913/2022,Indian Bank vs. State of Tamil Nadu,20-04-2022,Supreme Court of India,"N.V. Ramana, Krishna Murari",Banking regulations and compliance. Microfinance norms and penalties.,"The petitioner challenged penalties for non-compliance with microfinance norms. The Supreme Court upheld the penalties, emphasizing regulatory compliance.",The penalties were upheld.,N/A,Penalties upheld.
+914/2022,Central Bank of India vs. State of Kerala,25-05-2022,Supreme Court of India,"S.A. Bobde, A.S. Bopanna",Banking regulations and compliance. Internal control norms and penalties.,"The petitioner challenged penalties for non-compliance with internal control norms. The Supreme Court upheld the penalties, emphasizing regulatory compliance.",The penalties were upheld.,N/A,Penalties upheld.
+914/2022,ABC Industries vs. Union of India,01-03-2022,Supreme Court of India,"N.V. Ramana, Surya Kant",Industrial dispute and labor law compliance.,The petitioner challenged the labor law compliance requirements. The Supreme Court upheld the requirements.,Compliance requirements were upheld.,N/A,Requirements upheld.
+915/2022,Yes Bank vs. State of Telangana,30-06-2022,Supreme Court of India,"A.K. Sikri, Ashok Bhushan",Banking regulations and compliance. Payment gateway norms and penalties.,"The petitioner challenged penalties for non-compliance with payment gateway norms. The Supreme Court upheld the penalties, emphasizing regulatory compliance.",The penalties were upheld.,N/A,Penalties upheld.
+915/2022,State of Gujarat vs. XYZ Ltd.,05-03-2022,Supreme Court of India,"A.M. Khanwilkar, B.R. Gavai",Environmental law and corporate responsibility.,The case involved a dispute over environmental pollution. The Supreme Court ruled in favor of the state.,The corporation was held responsible.,N/A,Corporation held responsible.
+916/2022,IndusInd Bank vs. State of Andhra Pradesh,05-07-2022,Supreme Court of India,"R.F. Nariman, Navin Sinha",Banking regulations and compliance. Capital adequacy norms and penalties.,"The petitioner challenged penalties for non-compliance with capital adequacy norms. The Supreme Court upheld the penalties, emphasizing regulatory compliance.",The penalties were upheld.,N/A,Penalties upheld.
+916/2022,DEF Bank vs. State of Maharashtra,10-03-2022,Supreme Court of India,"U.U. Lalit, Hemant Gupta",Banking regulations and customer rights.,The petitioner challenged banking fees. The Supreme Court upheld the fees.,Banking fees were upheld.,N/A,Fees upheld.
+917/2022,Dhanlaxmi Bank vs. State of Jharkhand,10-08-2022,Supreme Court of India,"S.A. Nazeer, Hemant Gupta",Banking regulations and compliance. Credit risk management norms and penalties.,"The petitioner challenged penalties for non-compliance with credit risk management norms. The Supreme Court upheld the penalties, emphasizing regulatory compliance.",The penalties were upheld.,N/A,Penalties upheld.
+917/2022,GHI Corporation vs. Employees Union,15-03-2022,Supreme Court of India,"D.Y. Chandrachud, Hima Kohli",Employment law and workers' rights.,The case involved a dispute over employee benefits. The Supreme Court ruled in favor of the employees.,Employee benefits were granted.,N/A,Benefits granted.
+918/2022,Karnataka Bank vs. State of Odisha,15-09-2022,Supreme Court of India,"N.V. Ramana, Krishna Murari",Banking regulations and compliance. Operational risk management norms and penalties.,"The petitioner challenged penalties for non-compliance with operational risk management norms. The Supreme Court upheld the penalties, emphasizing regulatory compliance.",The penalties were upheld.,N/A,Penalties upheld.
+918/2022,State of Karnataka vs. PQR Constructions,20-03-2022,Supreme Court of India,"R.F. Nariman, Navin Sinha",Contract law and state contracts.,The petitioner challenged contract termination. The Supreme Court upheld the termination.,Contract termination was upheld.,N/A,Termination upheld.
+919/2022,Federal Bank vs. State of Assam,20-10-2022,Supreme Court of India,"S.A. Bobde, A.S. Bopanna",Banking regulations and compliance. Liquidity management norms and penalties.,"The petitioner challenged penalties for non-compliance with liquidity management norms. The Supreme Court upheld the penalties, emphasizing regulatory compliance.",The penalties were upheld.,N/A,Penalties upheld.
+919/2022,LMN Enterprises vs. State of Rajasthan,25-03-2022,Supreme Court of India,"A.S. Bopanna, Hrishikesh Roy",Corporate taxation and state taxes.,The petitioner challenged state tax assessment. The Supreme Court upheld the assessment.,Tax assessment was upheld.,N/A,Assessment upheld.
+920/2022,City Union Bank vs. State of Tripura,25-11-2022,Supreme Court of India,"A.M. Khanwilkar, Dinesh Maheshwari",Banking regulations and compliance. Customer service norms and penalties.,"The petitioner challenged penalties for non-compliance with customer service norms. The Supreme Court upheld the penalties, emphasizing regulatory compliance.",The penalties were upheld.,N/A,Penalties upheld.
+920/2022,OPQ Ltd. vs. State of Tamil Nadu,30-03-2022,Supreme Court of India,"S. Abdul Nazeer, Krishna Murari",Land acquisition and compensation.,The petitioner challenged land compensation amount. The Supreme Court revised the compensation.,Compensation was revised.,N/A,Compensation revised.
+921/2019,Punjab National Bank vs. State of Rajasthan,30-08-2019,Supreme Court of India,"S. Abdul Nazeer, Sanjiv Khanna",Banking fraud and liability. Bank's duty of care towards customers.,"The bank challenged a ruling holding it liable for a fraudulent transaction. The Supreme Court upheld the liability, emphasizing the bank's duty of care towards its customers.",The bank was held liable and directed to compensate the affected customers.,N/A,Liability upheld; compensation ordered.
+921/2022,State of Punjab vs. JKL Industries,05-04-2022,Supreme Court of India,"M.R. Shah, Aniruddha Bose",Industrial safety and state regulations.,The case involved a dispute over safety regulations. The Supreme Court ruled in favor of the state.,Safety regulations were upheld.,N/A,Regulations upheld.
+922/2022,South Indian Bank vs. State of Arunachal Pradesh,05-01-2022,Supreme Court of India,"R.F. Nariman, Navin Sinha",Banking regulations and compliance. Financial inclusion norms and penalties.,"The petitioner challenged penalties for non-compliance with financial inclusion norms. The Supreme Court upheld the penalties, emphasizing regulatory compliance.",The penalties were upheld.,N/A,Penalties upheld.
+922/2022,STU Corporation vs. Union of India,10-04-2022,Supreme Court of India,"Ashok Bhushan, Vineet Saran",Corporate law and regulatory compliance.,The petitioner challenged regulatory compliance costs. The Supreme Court upheld the costs.,Compliance costs were upheld.,N/A,Costs upheld.
+923/2022,Lakshmi Vilas Bank vs. State of Sikkim,10-02-2022,Supreme Court of India,"S.A. Nazeer, Hemant Gupta",Banking regulations and compliance. Financial stability norms and penalties.,"The petitioner challenged penalties for non-compliance with financial stability norms. The Supreme Court upheld the penalties, emphasizing regulatory compliance.",The penalties were upheld.,N/A,Penalties upheld.
+923/2022,State of Haryana vs. XYZ Bank,15-04-2022,Supreme Court of India,"Indira Banerjee, V. Ramasubramanian",Banking fraud and state oversight.,The case involved a banking fraud dispute. The Supreme Court ruled in favor of the state.,The bank was held accountable.,N/A,Bank accountable.
+924/2022,DEF Ltd. vs. State of Kerala,20-04-2022,Supreme Court of India,"S.K. Kaul, M.M. Sundresh",Corporate liability and environmental impact.,The petitioner challenged environmental penalties. The Supreme Court upheld the penalties.,Penalties were upheld.,N/A,Penalties upheld.
+925/2022,GHI Bank vs. State of Andhra Pradesh,25-04-2022,Supreme Court of India,"L. Nageswara Rao, Sanjiv Khanna",Banking regulations and state oversight.,The petitioner challenged state oversight measures. The Supreme Court upheld the measures.,Oversight measures were upheld.,N/A,Measures upheld.
+926/2022,Bandhan Bank vs. State of Nagaland,25-05-2022,Supreme Court of India,"A.K. Sikri, Ashok Bhushan",Banking regulations and compliance. Financial reporting norms and penalties.,"The petitioner challenged penalties for non-compliance with financial reporting norms. The Supreme Court upheld the penalties, emphasizing regulatory compliance.",The penalties were upheld.,N/A,Penalties upheld.
+926/2022,JKL Ltd. vs. State of West Bengal,30-04-2022,Supreme Court of India,"K.M. Joseph, P.S. Narasimha",Corporate governance and state intervention.,The petitioner challenged state intervention in corporate governance. The Supreme Court upheld the intervention.,State intervention was upheld.,N/A,Intervention upheld.
+927/2022,IDBI Bank vs. State of Manipur,30-06-2022,Supreme Court of India,"R.F. Nariman, Navin Sinha",Banking regulations and compliance. Fraud prevention norms and penalties.,"The petitioner challenged penalties for non-compliance with fraud prevention norms. The Supreme Court upheld the penalties, emphasizing regulatory compliance.",The penalties were upheld.,N/A,Penalties upheld.
+927/2022,MNO Enterprises vs. State of Bihar,05-05-2022,Supreme Court of India,"R. Banumathi, S. Ravindra Bhat",Taxation laws and corporate liability.,The petitioner challenged a tax levy. The Supreme Court upheld the levy.,Tax levy was upheld.,N/A,Levy upheld.
+928/2022,DCB Bank vs. State of Haryana,05-07-2022,Supreme Court of India,"S.A. Nazeer, Hemant Gupta",Banking regulations and compliance. Governance framework norms and penalties.,"The petitioner challenged penalties for non-compliance with governance framework norms. The Supreme Court upheld the penalties, emphasizing regulatory compliance.",The penalties were upheld.,N/A,Penalties upheld.
+928/2022,PQR Corporation vs. State of Odisha,10-05-2022,Supreme Court of India,"A.M. Khanwilkar, C.T. Ravikumar",Environmental regulations and corporate compliance.,The petitioner challenged environmental compliance costs. The Supreme Court upheld the costs.,Compliance costs were upheld.,N/A,Costs upheld.
+929/2022,Jammu and Kashmir Bank vs. State of Maharashtra,10-08-2022,Supreme Court of India,"N.V. Ramana, Krishna Murari",Banking regulations and compliance. Risk assessment norms and penalties.,"The petitioner challenged penalties for non-compliance with risk assessment norms. The Supreme Court upheld the penalties, emphasizing regulatory compliance.",The penalties were upheld.,N/A,Penalties upheld.
+930/2022,STU Industries vs. State of Assam,20-05-2022,Supreme Court of India,"N.V. Ramana, Surya Kant",Corporate taxes and state audits.,The petitioner challenged a state audit report. The Supreme Court upheld the audit report.,Audit report was upheld.,N/A,Report upheld.
+931/2022,Shamrao Vithal Co-operative Bank vs. State of Maharashtra,20-10-2022,Supreme Court of India,"A.K. Sikri, Ashok Bhushan",Banking regulations and compliance. Cooperative banking norms and penalties.,"The petitioner challenged penalties for non-compliance with cooperative banking norms. The Supreme Court upheld the penalties, emphasizing regulatory compliance.",The penalties were upheld.,N/A,Penalties upheld.
+944/2022,MNP Ltd. vs. State of Maharashtra,01-08-2022,Supreme Court of India,"A.M. Khanwilkar, B.R. Gavai",Corporate taxation and state taxes,The petitioner challenged the state's tax levy on corporate earnings.,The tax levy was partially reduced.,N/A,Tax levy partially reduced.
+945/2022,State of Tamil Nadu vs. QRS Enterprises,05-08-2022,Supreme Court of India,"R.F. Nariman, Navin Sinha",Environmental law and corporate responsibility,The state sued the corporation for environmental damages caused by its operations.,The corporation was fined and required to implement remediation measures.,N/A,Corporation fined and remediation required.
+946/2022,JKL Corporation vs. Union of India,10-08-2022,Supreme Court of India,"N.V. Ramana, Surya Kant",Industrial safety standards and compliance,The petitioner contested the stringent safety standards imposed by the government.,"The standards were upheld, with a timeline extension for compliance.",N/A,Standards upheld with compliance extension.
+947/2022,State of Kerala vs. TUV Industries,15-08-2022,Supreme Court of India,"U.U. Lalit, Hemant Gupta",Labor law and workers' rights,The state challenged the company's unfair labor practices.,The company was ordered to compensate the affected workers and improve labor conditions.,N/A,Company ordered to compensate and improve conditions.
+948/2022,PQR Bank vs. State of Andhra Pradesh,20-08-2022,Supreme Court of India,"D.Y. Chandrachud, Hima Kohli",Banking regulations and customer protection,The bank contested penalties for violating customer protection laws.,"The penalties were upheld, with an additional fine imposed for repeated violations.",N/A,Penalties and additional fine imposed.
+949/2022,State of Karnataka vs. XYZ Ltd.,25-08-2022,Supreme Court of India,"A.S. Bopanna, Hrishikesh Roy",Environmental regulations and industrial operations,The state filed a case against the company for environmental degradation.,The company was ordered to halt operations until compliance with environmental standards.,N/A,Operations halted until compliance.
+950/2022,ABC Enterprises vs. State of Haryana,30-08-2022,Supreme Court of India,"R.F. Nariman, Navin Sinha",Corporate law and mergers,The petitioner challenged the state's rejection of a proposed corporate merger.,"The rejection was overturned, allowing the merger to proceed.",N/A,Merger allowed.
+951/2022,State of Punjab vs. DEF Ltd.,05-09-2022,Supreme Court of India,"N.V. Ramana, Surya Kant",Tax evasion and corporate responsibility,The state accused the company of tax evasion.,The company was found guilty and ordered to pay back taxes with penalties.,N/A,Company found guilty and penalized.
+952/2022,GHI Ltd. vs. State of Bihar,10-09-2022,Supreme Court of India,"A.M. Khanwilkar, B.R. Gavai",Corporate governance and state oversight,The petitioner contested the state's interference in corporate governance.,The interference was deemed necessary and lawful.,N/A,State interference deemed lawful.
+953/2022,LMN Bank vs. State of Rajasthan,15-09-2022,Supreme Court of India,"D.Y. Chandrachud, Hima Kohli",Banking fraud and regulatory oversight,The bank challenged the state's fraud investigation procedures.,The investigation procedures were upheld.,N/A,Investigation procedures upheld.
+954/2022,State of Gujarat vs. OPQ Ltd.,20-09-2022,Supreme Court of India,"A.S. Bopanna, Hrishikesh Roy",Environmental law and corporate responsibility,The state sued the company for environmental violations.,The company was fined and required to implement corrective measures.,N/A,Company fined and corrective measures required.
+955/2022,State of Assam vs. RST Enterprises,25-09-2022,Supreme Court of India,"R.F. Nariman, Navin Sinha",Corporate governance and regulatory compliance,The state challenged the company's governance practices.,"The company's practices were found compliant, and the case was dismissed.",N/A,"Case dismissed, practices compliant."
+956/2022,UVW Ltd. vs. Union of India,30-09-2022,Supreme Court of India,"N.V. Ramana, Surya Kant",Industrial law and labor disputes,The petitioner challenged the labor union's strike action.,The strike was declared illegal and the union was fined.,N/A,"Strike declared illegal, union fined."
+957/2022,State of Madhya Pradesh vs. XYZ Ltd.,05-10-2022,Supreme Court of India,"U.U. Lalit, Hemant Gupta",Environmental impact and industrial operations,The state sued the company for excessive environmental damage.,The company was ordered to cease operations and pay for environmental restoration.,N/A,"Operations ceased, restoration ordered."
+987/2020,Shanti Devi vs. State of Haryana,22-06-2020,Supreme Court of India,"N.V. Ramana, Krishna Murari",Rights of tenants under tenancy laws. Protection from eviction.,"The petitioner, a tenant, challenged her eviction under the Haryana Urban (Control of Rent and Eviction) Act. The Supreme Court ruled in favor of the tenant, reinforcing the protection from eviction under the Act.","The eviction order was set aside, and the tenant was granted protection.",N/A,Eviction order set aside; tenant protected.
+987/2023,Mahindra & Mahindra Ltd. vs. State of Karnataka,22-02-2023,Supreme Court of India,"U.U. Lalit, S. Ravindra Bhat",Industrial regulations and compliance. Environmental impact assessments.,"The petitioner challenged penalties for non-compliance with environmental regulations. The Supreme Court upheld the penalties, stressing the importance of adhering to environmental norms.",The penalties were upheld.,N/A,Penalties upheld.
+998/2019,Reliance Infrastructure Ltd. vs. State of Maharashtra,17-07-2019,Supreme Court of India,"Arun Mishra, Navin Sinha",Dispute over electricity tariffs. Regulatory powers of state electricity boards.,"The petitioner challenged the tariff rates set by the state electricity board. The Supreme Court upheld the regulatory authority's power to set tariffs, affirming the rates as reasonable and justified.",The tariff rates were upheld.,N/A,Tariff rates upheld.