--- license: mit configs: - config_name: static data_files: - split: test path: static.csv - config_name: temporal data_files: - split: test path: temporal.csv - config_name: disputable data_files: - split: test path: disputable.csv task_categories: - question-answering language: - en pretty_name: DynamicQA size_categories: - 10K main_figure

Our paper investigates the Language Model's behaviour when the conflicting knowledge exist within the LM's parameters. We present a novel dataset containing inherently conflicting data, DYNAMICQA. Our dataset consists of three partitions, **Static**, **Disputable** 🤷‍♀️, and **Temporal** 🕰️. We also evaluate several measures on their ability to reflect the presence of intra-memory conflict: **Semantic Entropy** and a novel **Coherent Persuasion Score**. You can find our findings from our paper! The implementation of the measures is available on our github [repo](https://github.com/copenlu/dynamicqa)! ## Dataset Our dataset consists of three different partitions. | Partition | Number of Questions | | --------- | ------------------- | | Static | 2500 | | Temporal | 2495 | | Disputable | 694 | ### Details 1. Question : "question" column 2. Answers : Two different answers are available: one in the "obj" column and the other in the "replace_name" column. 3. Context : Context ("context" column) is masked with \[ENTITY\]. Before providing the context to the LM, you should replace \[ENTITY\] with either "obj" or "replace_name". 4. Number of edits : "num_edits" column. This denotes Temporality for temporal partition, and Disputability for disputable partition.