Datasets:

epfl-llm
/

guidelines

@@ -48,9 +48,11 @@ Clinical practice guidelines are rigorously researched frameworks designed to gu
 They are compiled through a systematic process of collaborative consensus between experts to establish recommendations from the latest evidence on best practices that would maximize benefit in light of practical concerns such as available resources and context. As a super-synthesis of meta-analyses, they sit atop the *evidence pyramid* and form the basis of actionable evidence-based practice.
 CPGs are produced at various geographic and organizational granularities, ranging from global to hospital-level initiatives directed by international professional medical associations to informal consortia, regional or national governmental bodies to individual NGOs and hospitals.
-The geographic scope ranges from global (WHO) to national (CDC, NICE) and regional (Ontario, Melbourne) to institutional (ICRC, Mayo Clinic). The corpus also represents health care concerns from high- (Ontario, Melbourne), low- (WHO), and volatile- (ICRC) resource settings.
-Guidelines also contains a range of technical and conversational vocabulary with target audiences of clinicians or patients (or both), and is sometimes highly specialized within a theme (cancer, pediatrics, infectious disease). The peer review processes also ranged from UN bodies (WHO), institutional review boards (ICRC), professional associations (AAFP) to publicly crowdsourced knowledge bases (WikiDoc).
-Article length varies widely from very short statements to 100+ page guides.
 #### Who are the source data producers?

 They are compiled through a systematic process of collaborative consensus between experts to establish recommendations from the latest evidence on best practices that would maximize benefit in light of practical concerns such as available resources and context. As a super-synthesis of meta-analyses, they sit atop the *evidence pyramid* and form the basis of actionable evidence-based practice.
 CPGs are produced at various geographic and organizational granularities, ranging from global to hospital-level initiatives directed by international professional medical associations to informal consortia, regional or national governmental bodies to individual NGOs and hospitals.
+- **Geographic scope**: The geographic scope ranges from global (WHO) to national (CDC, NICE) and regional (Ontario, Melbourne) to institutional (ICRC, Mayo Clinic).
+- **Resource levels**: The corpus also represents health care concerns from high- (Ontario, Melbourne), low- (WHO), and volatile- (ICRC) resource settings.
+- **Audience level**: Guidelines also contains a range of technical and conversational vocabulary with target audiences of clinicians or patients (or both), and is sometimes highly specialized within a theme (cancer, pediatrics, infectious disease). The peer review processes also ranged from UN bodies (WHO), institutional review boards (ICRC), professional associations (AAFP) to publicly crowdsourced knowledge bases (WikiDoc).
+- **Document size**: Article length varies widely from very short statements to 100+ page guides.
 #### Who are the source data producers?