Update README.md

README.md

@@ -69,11 +69,13 @@ You can scrape and clean all 16 guideline sources using our code in [epfLLM/medi
 <!-- This section describes suitable use cases for the dataset. -->
 The dataset is intended for use in tasks related to text generation, specifically in the context of clinical practice guidelines. It can be employed for training language models and other natural language processing applications within the healthcare domain.
 
-
 ### Out-of-Scope Use
 
 <!-- This section addresses misuse, malicious use, and uses that the dataset will not work well for. -->
 
+- **Redistribution: ** Please always check redistribution licenses before using the content as these may also evolve over time. To the best of our knowledge, we are following the redistribution licensing of each source and we invite users to inform us if that is not the case.
+- **Malicious use: ** We do not support any use of this corpus that may be harmful. Creating tools that provide clinical advice is commendable, but extremely dangerous if not done with the appropriate care. Such tools need to be validated for safety and utility by medical professionals in randomized controlled trials. i.e. Please don’t create cowboy health apps that fool vulnerable users into thinking they are receiving validated advice.
+
 [More Information Needed]
 
 ## Dataset Structure
@@ -151,14 +153,16 @@ As the articles are publicly accessible, no personal or sensitive information is
 
 Most guideline sources offer reliable and factual information, authored by trusted health professionals. However, users should exercise caution when relying on content from WikiDoc, as it is a crowdsourced encyclopedia. While it generally maintains high quality, there are no guarantees regarding its content.
 
-
-[More Information Needed]
+- **Peer-Review Quality: ** It is important to understand that while most sources are validated by internationally endorsed professional associations, a large proportion are from Wikidocs which has crowdsourced content. While edits in Wikidocs are generally restricted to expert review, the process of consensus and oversight is different from the traditional rigor of clinical guidelines.
+- **Representation: ** This corpus is in English, and over-represents English-speaking regions. Further While have included WHO and ICRC guidelines for low-resource settings, further work needs to be done to scrape other sources.
+- **Temporal scope: ** Guidelines are constantly updated and these represent a snapshot of each in August 2023. Please re-scrape for updated content.
 
 ### Recommendations
 
 <!-- This section is meant to convey recommendations with respect to the bias, risk, and technical limitations. -->
 
-[More Information Needed]
+We warmly invite users to help us build a more representative corpus with high-quality peer-reviewed clinical practice guidelines in various languages and representing the full scope of clinical specialties and geographic regions.
+We encourage users of this content to be mindful of its current limitations in temporal and geographic scope and  we repeat our warning: Creating tools that provide clinical advice is commendable, but extremely dangerous if not done with the appropriate care. Such tools need to be validated for safety and utility by medical professionals in randomized controlled trials. i.e. Please don’t create cowboy health apps that fool vulnerable users into thinking they are receiving validated advice.
 
 ## Acknowledgments
 
@@ -166,7 +170,7 @@ The availability of open-access clinical practice guidelines (CPG) was critical
 ## Authors
 
 - **Curation**: Mary-Anne Hartley
-- **Scraping**: Antoine Bonnet, Alexandre Sallinen, Igor Krawczuk
+- **Scraping**: Antoine Bonnet, Alexandre Sallinen, Igor Krawczuk, Kyle Matoba
 - **Cleaning**: Antoine Bonnet, Alexandre Sallinen