-
-#### What are the project could-haves?
-
-Instead of pin to top, maybe to the side, tilted by 90˚?
-
-
-
-#### What are the project wont-haves?
-
-
-
-#### Where do you expect traffic to come from?
-
-
-
-#### Please provide any related media files
-
-
-
-#### Will you need an opengraph image for social sharing?
-
-
-
-#### If applicable, please provide some example webpages for design guidance.
-
-
-
-#### If applicable, do you have any user journeys, prototypes, content/data?
-
-
-
-#### Please create a checklist of deliverables in this phase
-
-- [ ] Update page
-- [ ] Approved review of changes
-- [ ] Implement AB test (for example: compare clickthrough rate for `/stages-devops-lifecycle/...` pages vs. each stage's features' docu pages)
-- [ ] Release
-- [ ] Evaluate results (for example: higher clickthrough rate to `/stages-devops-lifecycle/...` page due to higher/longer visibility of each stage's header)
-- [ ] Code cleanup
-
-
-
-
-
-
-",2
-33978676,2020-04-29 22:29:50.077,Updating candidate sourced KPI to add chart,"#### Briefly describe the update
-
-
-
-
-
-",3
-33599213,2020-04-21 22:38:38.920,New Page for 2020 for Gartner MQ for AST,"
-#### Briefly describe the request
-
-Create a new web page for a new Gartner Magic Quadrant featuring GitLab
-
-#### What is/are the relevant URL(s)
-
-https://about.gitlab.com/analysts/gartner-ast20
-
-#### What team/dept/company initiatives does this relate to?
-
-Strategic Marketing always requests a web page for a new analyst report where we share information with sales on how to position this document for best advantage and frame GitLab properly in the context of their sales environment.
-
-#### Is there a due date? If so, why?
-
-The report is expected to come out the week of 2020-04-27. If we can have it that week, that would be good.
-
-#### What problem(s) are we trying to solve? What are the goals?
-
-* provide information to Sales
-
-#### Who is the audience?
-
-* sales
-* customers and prospects
-* analyst community
-
-#### What are the measurable key performance indicators (KPI)?
-
-* SEO
-
-#### Please identify the directly responsible individual (DRI), stakeholders, and roles
-
-
-
-
-|Name|Role|
-|------|------|
-| @tompsett | DRI |
-| @cfletcher1 | Content|
-| @cblake | Content |
-| @NicoleSchwartz | Content |
-
-
-
-#### What are the project must-haves?
-
-The web page set up like other web pages on that *.../analysts/* group of pages
-
-
-#### What are the project should-haves?
-
-Nothing else really
-
-
-#### Where do you expect traffic to come from?
-
-* Sales
-* Blog posts
-
-#### Please provide any related media files
-
-We do not have that media yet. It is not released until the analysts release the page. We are not given more than 24 hours notice of this going live.
-
-#### Will you need an opengraph image for social sharing?
-
-I don't think so, since I have no idea what that is.
-
-#### If applicable, please provide some example webpages for design guidance.
-
-../analysts/gartner-aro19
-
-
-#### Please create a checklist of deliverables in this phase
-
-
-- [ ] create new page in same manner as others in that group
-
-Marked confidential because we cannot have anyone know we are anticipating being in this report until it is published.
-
-
-
-
-",1
-33580804,2020-04-21 16:17:12.572,Create a new Marketo landing page template phase 1,"@jgragnola @sbouchard1 FYI I've filed this issue to centralize the landing page requirements we've discussed on zoom, slack, and gathered from various issues.
-
-#### Briefly describe the request
-
-Create a Marketo landing page template for campaigns.
-
-#### What team/dept/company initiatives does this relate to?
-
-* [Marketing agility, modular pages via boring project](https://gitlab.com/groups/gitlab-com/-/epics/402#note_327516774)
-
-#### What problem(s) are we trying to solve? What are the goals?
-
-* (Primary) Make it easier for marketing to create landing pages.
-* Improve the cohesiveness of the user flow from ads all the way to downloads and PF experiences.
-* Improve the conversion rate of lead generation forms.
-* Align about.gitlab landing pages with Marketo landing pages.
-
-#### Who is the audience?
-
-* (Primary) Users who want to learn more about a targeted subject.
-* Users who want to browse our content.
-
-#### What are the measurable key performance indicators (KPI)?
-
-* Form submissions.
-
-#### Please identify the directly responsible individual (DRI), stakeholders, and roles
-
-|Name|Role|
-|-|-|
-|***`@jgragnola`***|***DRI***|
-|`@sbouchard1`|Conversion|
-|`@luke`|Design|
-|`@amy.waller`|Marketo|
-|`@mnguyen4`|Ads|
-|`@shanerice`|Metrics|
-|`@sdaily`|Pathfactory|
-|`@wspillane`|Social|
-
-#### What are the must-haves modules?
-
-* Hero
-* Bullet list
-* Form
- * Before & after
-* Image to showcase a preview of the resource
-* Trusted by
-* Value (Pathfactory)
-* Meta title and opengraph copy.
-
-#### What are the should-haves modules?
-
-* CTA header
- * On, off, auto-hide
-* Opengraph image
-* Free trial CTA
-* Social sharing (similar to webcasts)
-* Speaker module (near hero).
-* Event interest registration.
-
-#### What are the could-have modules?
-
-* Calendar
-* Card list
-* Icon list
-* Paragraphs with floated image
-
-#### Where do you expect traffic to come from?
-
-* Email
-* Ads
-* Social
-
-#### If applicable, do you have any user journeys, prototypes, content/data?
-
-* [Creating a responsive Marketo landing page template](https://www.grazitti.com/blog/create-responsive-landing-pages-in-marketo/)
-* [Prior issue with mockups for implementing a Marketo landing page](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-com/marketing/corporate-marketing/-/issues/262)
-* [Figma for cohhesive conversion paths](https://www.figma.com/file/ZXMLi2KANpumss7MXtAgi7/Cohesive-%26-Efficient-Conversion-Paths?node-id=0%3A1)
-* [Jumpstart Figma file](https://www.figma.com/file/RfId179phVJZ9rgm6aBdys/Jumpstart?node-id=25%3A708)
-* [Event template figma file](https://www.figma.com/file/frPfePiwZlywXoTkEsw5g1/Email-Web-Design-System---Commit-Example?node-id=0%3A1)
-* [Event landing page template issue](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-com/www-gitlab-com/-/issues/6295)
-* [Comparison pages Figma](https://www.figma.com/file/4EDH2Zc8bXRjQ4cVL3cdlr/GitLab-vs.-Campaign?node-id=142%3A0)
-* https://about.gitlab.com/compare/github-actions-alternative/
-* https://about.gitlab.com/compare/jenkins-alternative/
-* https://about.gitlab.com/just-commit/lower-tco/
-* https://about.gitlab.com/solutions/aws/
-
-#### Please create a checklist of deliverables in this phase
-
-- [x] Create a responsive Marketo landing page template.
-- [x] Identify and implement MVC toggleable and editable regions.
-- [x] Review with stakeholders.
-- [x] Ensure we have sufficient analytics for performance metrics.
- * Classnames.
- * Tracking tags (GTM).
- * Javascript events.
- * UTMs.
- * Pathfactory & email addresses.
-- [x] Ensure opengraph data works as expected.
-- [x] Check for mobile usability.
- * Finger-friendly touch interactions.
- * Mobile viewport meta tags are present and sized appropriately.
-- [ ] Browser / SPA icon.
-- [x] Appropriate font-stack is used.
-- [ ] Ensure that the new look and feel aligns with upcoming ads & campaigns as well as past ones.
- * Example: [DevSecOps campaign](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-com/marketing/digital-marketing-programs/-/issues/2592#note_328544950)
-- [x] Assess if the template is applicable to this [template request](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-com/marketing/corporate-marketing/-/issues/2425)
-- [x] Create a followup issue for the next phase.
-
-#### Saved for later phases
-
-* Document how to use the new template.
-* Preview of ""what's inside""
-* Implement AB testing framework.
-
-
-
-",24
-33537225,2020-04-20 22:48:27.004,A/B Test on Contact Sales Form,"
-
-#### Briefly describe the request
-
-
-A/B Test the demo form on /sales
-
-#### What is/are the relevant URL(s)
-
-https://about.gitlab.com/sales/
-
-#### Please identify the directly responsible individual (DRI) and stakeholders
-
-@EWhelchel @Elsje @amimmo @amy.waller
-
-#### What team/dept/company initiatives does this relate to?
-
-SDR, Sales
-
-
-#### Is there a due date? If so, why?
-
-No specific due date, we would like to get this done to improve lead conversion.
-
-
-#### What are the project goals?
-
-* Improve Form conversion
-* Improve lead conversion rates, making it easier for sales to reach prospect via
-
-#### Who is the audience?
-
-Prospects who land on the Demo page.
-
-#### What problem(s) are we trying to solve?
-
-Increase lead conversion rates, without sacrificing too much of form conversion. Phone number being required should make it easier for SDRs to reach out to prospects.
-
-
-#### What are the measurable key performance indicators (KPI)?
-
-* Form Conversion
-* Lead Conversion
-
-
-#### What are the project must-haves?
-
-AB Test on the page for the two forms.
-
-
-#### What are the project should-haves?
-
-
-
-#### What are the project could-haves?
-
-
-
-#### What are the project wont-haves?
-
-
-
-#### Where do you expect traffic to come from?
-
-Typical traffic to page - no changes
-
-
-#### Please provide any related media files
-
-Embed Code for B test form 2535: I can't get this to paste
-
-Let me know if you need the code for the A test.
-
-#### Will you need an opengraph image for social sharing?
-
-No
-
-#### If applicable, please provide some example webpages for design guidance.
-
-
-
-#### If applicable, do you have any user journeys, prototypes, content/data?
-
-
-
-#### Please create a checklist of deliverables in this phase
-
-
-
-- [ ] A/B Test set up
-- [ ] Create a followup issue for the next phase (monitor results)
-
-
-
-
-
-
-",2
-33537169,2020-04-20 22:44:42.944,A/B Test on Demo Form for Phone number,"
-
-#### Briefly describe the request
-
-
-A/B Test the demo form on /demo
-
-
-#### What is/are the relevant URL(s)
-
-https://about.gitlab.com/demo/
-
-#### Please identify the directly responsible individual (DRI) and stakeholders
-
-@EWhelchel @Elsje @amimmo @amy.waller
-
-#### What team/dept/company initiatives does this relate to?
-
-
-
-#### Is there a due date? If so, why?
-
-No specific due date, we would like to get this done to improve lead conversion.
-
-
-#### What are the project goals?
-
-* Improve Form conversion
-* Improve lead conversion rates, making it easier for sales to reach prospect via
-
-#### Who is the audience?
-
-Prospects who land on the Demo page.
-
-#### What problem(s) are we trying to solve?
-
-Increase lead conversion rates, without sacrificing too much of form conversion. Phone number being required should make it easier for SDRs to reach out to prospects.
-
-
-#### What are the measurable key performance indicators (KPI)?
-
-* Form Conversion
-* Lead Conversion
-
-
-#### What are the project must-haves?
-
-AB Test on each form.
-
-
-#### What are the project should-haves?
-
-
-
-#### What are the project could-haves?
-
-
-
-#### What are the project wont-haves?
-
-
-
-#### Where do you expect traffic to come from?
-
-Typical traffic to page - no changes
-
-
-#### Please provide any related media files
-
-Embed Code for B test form: I can't get this to paste
-
-Let me know if you need the code for the A test.
-
-#### Will you need an opengraph image for social sharing?
-
-No
-
-#### If applicable, please provide some example webpages for design guidance.
-
-
-
-#### If applicable, do you have any user journeys, prototypes, content/data?
-
-
-
-#### Please create a checklist of deliverables in this phase
-
-
-
-- [ ] A/B Test set up
-- [ ] Create a followup issue for the next phase (monitor results)
-
-
-
-
-
-
-",2
-33344622,2020-04-15 23:09:04.583,Transition the valuedriver pages to use cases,"This is a filler/placeholder issue while @brandon_lyon figures out the details.
-
-
-
-",4
-33096409,2020-04-09 12:09:49.686,Blog Post: Show GitLab UI changed over years in pictures (Date TBD/by end of May),"### Proposal
-
-I have quite a few screenshots of different old versions of GitLab. When I show it to some GitLab people, they were excited about it. One person suggested I make a blog post out of it.
-
-This can be a single blog post or series. With few screenshots per-year and some little text. Or more extended version. Right now its a raw idea. I don't have a good plan yet. Want to check out what people think.
-
-Few example of screenshots I have:
-
-| Page | Year | Screenshot |
-|---|---|---|
-| merge_request| 2012 |  |
-| dashboard | 2013 |  |
-| dashboard/issues | 2014 | |
-| project/tree | 2015 |  |
-
-
-### Checklist
-
-- [x] If you have a specific publish date in mind (please allow 3 weeks' lead time)
- - [x] Include it in the issue title
- - [ ] Give the issue a due date of a minimum of 2 working days prior
- - [ ] If your post is likely to be >2,000 words, give a due date of a minimum of 4 working days prior
-- [ ] If [time sensitive](https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/marketing/blog/#time-sensitive-posts-official-announcements-company-updates-breaking-changes-and-news)
- - [ ] Added ~""priority"" label and supplied rationale in description
- - [ ] Mentioned `@rebecca` to give her a heads up ASAP
-- [ ] If wide-spread customer impacting or sensitive
- - [ ] Add ~""sensitive"" label
- - [ ] Mention `@nwoods` to give her a heads up ASAP
-- [ ] If the post is about one of GitLab's Technology Partners, including integration partners, mention `@TinaS` and see the [blog handbook for more on third-party posts](https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/marketing/blog/index.html#third-party-posts)
-- [ ] Indicate if supporting an event or campaign
-- [ ] Indicate if this post requires additional approval from internal or external parties before publishing (please provide details in a comment)",3
-32963934,2020-04-06 23:29:41.644,DevOpsTools Comparison Pages - Design,"This is issue is related to all design work required to build and launch the new Dev Ops Tool Comparison webpage.
-
-You can view the broad stroke estimate and initial planning here: https://gitlab.com/gitlab-com/marketing/product-marketing/-/issues/2266
-
-There is a another issue related to the development of this page here: https://gitlab.com/gitlab-com/www-gitlab-com/-/issues/7052
-
-
-# Helpful Links
-* [latest wires](https://www.figma.com/file/4EDH2Zc8bXRjQ4cVL3cdlr/GitLab-vs.-Campaign?node-id=142%3A0) to clarify scope of work
-* [Initial Estimates in Days](https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/13hrQGM1re7k9LD0LrZYTYj1Qisx5e6aUvV84-CXUKhw/edit#gid=0) (1 work day considered 6.5 hours of work).",3
-32963902,2020-04-06 23:27:58.802,DevOpsTools Comparison Pages - Development,"This is issue is related to all development work required to build and launch the new Dev Ops Tool Comparison webpage.
-
-You can view the broad stroke estimate and initial planning here: https://gitlab.com/gitlab-com/marketing/product-marketing/-/issues/2266
-
-There is a another issue related to the design of this page here:
-
-
-# Helpful Links
-* [latest wires](https://www.figma.com/file/4EDH2Zc8bXRjQ4cVL3cdlr/GitLab-vs.-Campaign?node-id=142%3A0) to clarify scope of work
-* [Initial Estimates in Days](https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/13hrQGM1re7k9LD0LrZYTYj1Qisx5e6aUvV84-CXUKhw/edit#gid=0) (1 work day considered 6.5 hours of work).
-
-Figma Design Link: https://www.figma.com/file/kQjjTnRL6aFhhvdE4Zd4AO/GitLab-vs.-GitHub?node-id=0%3A1",10
-32951036,2020-04-06 16:11:13.682,Moving a new case study to the landing page,"Trying to add this new case study:
-https://about.gitlab.com/customers/axway-devops/
-
-To the top of the landing page, in the place of ESA:
-https://about.gitlab.com/customers/
-
-
-Thanks.",1
-32704197,2020-03-31 22:40:02.760,2020Q2 update website issue templates and documentation,"### Broad goals
-
-* Communicate how to work with the marketing Brand and Digital team.
-* Improve the quality of issues received in the www-gitlab-com repository.
-
-### Pain points
-
-* ""How do I create a website request?""
-* ""Which template do I use for what?""
-* Documents are TLDR.
-
-### Specific goals, default issue template
-
-* People aren't reading. Replace this copy with a simple ""Please select a template from above. Issues without a template are unlikely to be prioritized""
-* Link to B&D as the repository DRI.
-* Each template should describe it's use, first thing.
-* Improve clarity of template titles (""be as explicit as possible"").
-* Consolidate templates & reduce choice overload.
-
-### Specific goals, other issue templates
-
-* Add more sections...
- * What are the pain points?
- * What company or team goals/initiatives does this align with?
- * **What are the deliverables?**
- * Explore the use of checklists, particularly in the case of deliverables.
- * **Directly ask for MOSCOW** instead of indirectly asking...
- * What are the must-haves?
- * What are the should-haves?
- * What are the could-haves?
- * What are the wont-haves?
-* Consolidate templates & reduce choice overload.
- * Streamline templates based on organic changes made over time via observation, similar to examples:
- * Issue description in [this issue](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-com/www-gitlab-com/issues/6294)
- * ""Deliverables"" comment in [this issue](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-com/marketing/corporate-marketing/-/issues/1596#note_274860052)
-* Add more information and requirements around due-dates.
- * Emphasize the use of phases and MVC.
-* Add section for requesting opengraph images so this isn't an afterthought.
-* Consider hiding titles and examples behind comments so that they aren't visible when someone forgets to delete sections.
-* People often aren't reading. Consider limiting details.
- * Remove sections which aren't commonly used or at the very least move them towards the bottom of the issue template.
- * Similarly move the most used sections towards the top.
-* Make labels as automated as possible.
- * Only require the most necessary labels, others can be added during grooming.
-* Reassess which parts should be opt-in vs opt-out.
- * switch cc pings @ gl-website from opt-out to opt-in.
- * switch from ""manually add labels"" to opt-out of labels.
-* Add breadcrumbs such as ""if you require any redesign to this page, you're using the wrong template. Please use X instead [link].""
-* Consider adding collapsible sections.
-* Add a label identifying which template was used. Certain templates already have this, many do not. This will help provide metrics around use.
-
-### Deliverables
-
-- [x] Updated default issue template.
-- [x] Updated individual issue templates.
-- [x] Search documentation for links to old templates and replace with new links.
-
-",4
-32643334,2020-03-30 17:00:46.056,Virtual DevOps Automation Workshops,"Per issue https://gitlab.com/gitlab-com/marketing/digital-marketing-programs/-/issues/2528 and MR https://gitlab.com/gitlab-com/www-gitlab-com/-/merge_requests/44438
-
-Related [Epic](https://gitlab.com/groups/gitlab-com/marketing/-/epics/854)
-
-@jennyt has requested the following:
-
-#### What is/are the expected URL(s)
-
-* /events/virtual-devops-workshops
-
-#### Briefly describe the page/flow
-
-1. A landing page that we can send people to for display and selection of virtual workshops. The actual workshops will be on separately created Marketo landing pages.
-
-#### If applicable, do you have any user journeys, wireframes, prototypes, content/data?
-
-The last time we did something similar was for the 2019 Roadshow https://about.gitlab.com/events/roadshow-2019/
-
-**MVC:**
-
-1. Add an agenda table in place of the speaker section (right side column). <-- `Currently the only item remaining on the request!` This is MVC because the page is text heavy and needs something (image, table) to break it up.
-2. Clone the 2019 Roadshow page, rephrase to virtual devops workshops. (jenny did this in the MR)
-3. Create a new data/event_virtual_devops_workshop.yml file to populate the data. (brandon did this)
-
-**Ideally:**
-
-1. The event selection at the bottom of the page will be on one line across the screen (to prevent scrolling) instead of vertical.
-2. Remove the speaker section from this page. (jenny did this in the MR)
-3. Add a ""who should attend"" section. (jenny did this in the MR)
-4. Implementing the functionality to automatically pull relevant events onto this page when the individual pages are created. (brandon did this)
-
-
-**Long term:** Brandon recommends we adapt the new event template created recently in the following issue https://gitlab.com/gitlab-com/www-gitlab-com/-/issues/6294, remove irrelevant sections, and add a new component for listing the virtual workshops.
-
-#### What is the primary purpose of this page/flow?
-
-Generate registrations for virtual workshops
-
-#### What are the KPI (Key Performance Indicators)
-
-Registration counts
-
-#### What information is this page/flow trying to convey?
-
-* Existence of virtual workshops
-* Agenda
-* Who should attend
-
-### Who is the primary audience? Be specific.
-
-* [x] Potential Prospects who have never heard about GitLab
-* [x] Prospects we're currently selling to
-* [ ] Non-paying customers
-* [x] Paying customers
-* [ ] Authorized resellers
-* [ ] Community members
-
-This workshop is designed for IT Professionals:
-
-* Actively evaluating GitLab for their organization
-* Driving innovation by knowing the full scope of the GitLab tool chain
-* Planning to increase operations
-
-#### Any other audiences?
-
-No
-
-#### Where do you expect traffic to come from?
-
-Marketing emails to database, sales-invited
-
-#### Does this page/flow require any forms
-
-Yes. @jennyt will assist in providing the relevant registration form. Registration form will be on the individual landing pages for each event.
-
-#### Is there a due date? If so, why?
-
-Please note that issues with a short deadline and no listed reasons are difficult to prioritize.
-
-**2020-03-27**, reasons unknown, deadline already passed.
-
-Reason for deadline: The time to set-up and promote a webcast or virtual event is a minimum of 45 days. This event was provided to the MPM team after this deadline. We are able to promote and fill the event, but we require the landing page as quickly as possible. Once the single page is set up with the functionality to pull the individual registration page links, we will not need to repeat this work.
-
-",5
-32352147,2020-03-23 20:43:57.882,Update & to and in location factor targets,"This repository primarily relates to the logged out marketing website
-https://about.gitlab.com/
-and company handbook
-https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/
-This is not the repository for requests related to docs.gitlab.com, product, or other parts of GitLab.
-
-## Issues should identify The Five W's
-https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Five_Ws
-who, what, when, where, and why.
-
-We also recommended MoSCoW sorting
-https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MoSCoW_method
-things the issue Must, Should, Could, and Won't do.
-
-* Please apply appropriate labels or your issue may not be sorted into appropriate boards.
-* Please select a template from the top left menu before continuing.
-
-Note there is a blank template
-https://gitlab.com/gitlab-com/www-gitlab-com/issues/new?issuable_template=blank-template
-pre-populated with labels and @ mentions.
-
-If you do not select an appropriate template then your issue might get lost. For more information about our workflows, please reference the handbook for the marketing website
-https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/marketing/website/
-website issue labels
-https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/marketing/brand-and-digital-design#working-with-issues-groups-and-labels
-or reference your team documentation.
-
-If you are not using a template then please add appropriate labels and @ mentions. Issues lacking known labels may not appear on work boards.
-
-### FAQ:
-
-Q: Which template should I use?
-
-A: Most people will use the template for bug reports or requesting page updates. Occasionally redesigns, new pages, feature proposals, or new templates are requested. There are also templates for writing various kinds of blog posts including the unfiltered category.
-
-The rest of the templates are specific to team, role, or special occasion.
-
-Q: When will you get to this issue?
-
-A: Your issue will be refined and then prioritized relative to other issues. Marketing's website development team is currently an impacted resource.
-
-Q: I have a hard deadline **related to contracts or events**. How do I ensure the issue gets done by then?
-
-A: Apply the label ""hard-deadline"" and assign a due date BEFORE the actual deadline. Leave a comment in the issue or description mentioning that it's time-sensitive and needs to be finished before the date in question if possible.
-
-Q: How does marketing's web development team determine priority levels?
-
-A: Please see our prioritization documentation
-https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/marketing/brand-and-digital-design/#prioritization
-
-Q: How do I link to an issue template?
-
-A: https://gitlab.com/gitlab-com/www-gitlab-com/issues/new?issuable_template=name-of-template
-
-Q: How do I edit this FAQ? I have another question.
-
-A: Submit an issue
-https://gitlab.com/gitlab-com/www-gitlab-com/issues/new
-with FAQ in the title and assign it to @ brandon_lyon or another member of the website team
-https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/marketing/website/",1
-32385568,2020-03-23 11:54:12.631,"Show the ""You're running out of CI minutes"" warnings on relevant pages in GitLab","We currently only show the ""You're running out of CI minutes"" banner warning on the Project overview page. Let's change that so that we'll also show it on Group overview, Projects Dashboard (`/dashboard/projects`), Groups dashboard pages (`/dashboard/groups`). Let's show these banners only to the owner of the group that's running out of CI minutes.
-
-We're updating the content and the styling of the banners via gitlab-org/growth/product#1514
-
-## Proposal
-
-| Group overview | Groups dashboard | Projects dashboard |
-|----------------|------------------|--------------------|
-|  |  |  |
-
-Changes:
-* Depending on the percentage remaining (30 or 5, see https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/growth/product/-/issues/1514/designs#banner-warnings-update), show either a warning- or a danger-styled banner on Group overview of the group that is running out of CI minutes. Show it only to group owners.
-* Depending on the percentage remaining (30 or 5), show either a warning- or a danger-styled banner on Groups dashboard. Show it only to group owners.
-* Depending on the percentage remaining (30 or 5), show either a warning- or a danger-styled banner on Projects dashboard. Show it only to group owners.
-
-Let's use vertical margins of 16 pixels to separate the banner from the main nav and the content of the page. ",1
-32235858,2020-03-20 14:48:17.689,CSS broken on GitLab Flow page,"URL: https://about.gitlab.com/solutions/gitlab-flow/
-
-cc @sbouchard1 @luke @brandon_lyon",2
-32155975,2020-03-18 23:49:36.634,Ecosystem Team page in Google results is invalid,"When Google searching for `gitlab ecosystem`, the first hit is https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/engineering/development/enablement/ecosystem/, which is a 404:
-
-
-
-The correct page is https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/engineering/development/dev/ecosystem/",1
-32137720,2020-03-18 14:25:05.954,Pricing page A/B test,"Implement [new pricing page](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/growth/team-tasks/uploads/1e276f257d2bf72c3a61fec75868fa52/image.png) as experiment.
-
-Parent issue: https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/growth/team-tasks/-/issues/73
-
-MR: https://gitlab.com/gitlab-com/www-gitlab-com/-/merge_requests/44494",3
-32137601,2020-03-18 14:21:38.134,Implement Snowplow tracking for pricing page A/B test,"Utilize the [A/B testing framework](https://gitlab.com/groups/gitlab-com/-/epics/290) for our pricing page test.
-
-MR: https://gitlab.com/gitlab-com/www-gitlab-com/-/merge_requests/44494
-Parent issue: https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/growth/team-tasks/-/issues/74
-
-I've setup the following snowplow events:
-
-Control:
-
-
- On pageload
-triggers the event:
-
-| property | value |
-|----------|-------|
-| category | `pricing_page` |
-| action | `page_view` |
-| label | empty |
-| se_property | `control` |
-| value | empty |
-
-
- Clicking on the `Sign Up` / `Install` buttons
-
-
-
-triggers these events:
-
-| property | value |
-|----------|-------|
-| category | `pricing_page` |
-| action | `cta_click` |
-| label | `free_saas` or `free_self_managed` |
-| se_property | `control` |
-| value | empty |
-
-
- Clicking on the `Buy Now` button
-
-
-triggers these events:
-
-| property | value |
-|----------|-------|
-| category | `pricing_page` |
-| action | `cta_click` |
-| label | {{plan_id}} |
-| se_property | `control` |
-| value | empty |
-
-
-Test:
-
-
- On pageload
-triggers the event:
-
-| property | value |
-|----------|-------|
-| category | `pricing_page` |
-| action | `page_view` |
-| label | empty |
-| se_property | `group` |
-| value | empty |
-
-
- Clicking on the `Start now` / `Buy now` buttons to open the modal
-
-
-triggers these events:
-
-| property | value |
-|----------|-------|
-| category | `pricing_page` |
-| action | `open_modal` |
-| label | `free`, `bronze-starter`, `silver-premium` or `gold-ultimate` |
-| se_property | `group` |
-| value | empty |
-
-
- Clicking on the `Sign-up for free` / `Install GitLab for free` buttons from the modal
-
-
-triggers these events:
-
-| property | value |
-|----------|-------|
-| category | `pricing_page` |
-| action | `cta_click` |
-| label | `free_saas` or `free_self_managed` |
-| se_property | `group` |
-| value | empty |
-
-And `test=jtbd` is added as a URL parameter on the links.
-
-
- Clicking on the `Purchase SaaS` / `Purchase Self-managed` buttons from the modal
-
-
-triggers these events:
-
-| property | value |
-|----------|-------|
-| category | `pricing_page` |
-| action | `cta_click` |
-| label | {{plan_id}} |
-| se_property | `group` |
-| value | empty |
-
-And `test=jtbd` is added as a URL parameter on the links.
- ",3
-32137436,2020-03-18 14:17:11.452,Setup testing framework for pricing page test,"Utilize the [A/B testing framework](https://gitlab.com/groups/gitlab-com/-/epics/290) for our pricing page test.
-
-Parent issue: https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/growth/team-tasks/-/issues/74",5
-31564128,2020-03-04 20:15:55.950,Followup AB test to valuedriver,"This issue is a followup for https://gitlab.com/gitlab-com/www-gitlab-com/issues/6595
-
-## Relevant URL
-
-* https://about.gitlab.com/just-commit/reduce-cycle-time/
-
-## AB testing LaunchDarkly documentation
-
-* https://docs.google.com/document/d/1_XztSRs_CMBulZDvrVbSHmCjtOnL0xd6gFUEVo_NxoA/edit?usp=sharing
-
-## Results of prior test found in
-
-* https://gitlab.com/gitlab-com/marketing/corporate-marketing/issues/1596#note_299047010
-
-## Requested deliverables
-
-* Switch the main nav so it doesn't have the free-trial CTA (free trial is distracting).
- * The thank you popup after submit could have free-trial as secondary CTA.
- * Make sure there is only one CTA.
- * Remove the ""ready to talk"" section at the bottom of the page.
-* Change the download CTA phrase from ""Read the Whitepaper"" to ""Get your Whitepaper"".
- * Suggested copy: any action word that doesn't sound like work (ie not ""read"")
-* Try different report screenshots or potentially animations, have a more graphical cover.
- * Ask Luke for suggestions, we could create a cover, perhaps some synergy of the graphic with the CTA button.
-* Try moving the bullet points into the purple section before the CTA button (what you will learn is important).
-* Change the popup title to match the button (Get your whitepaper).
-* Bump up the font size of and adjust copy to ""trusted by 100,000+ organizations worldwide"" and make it bigger.
-* Check with @ mnguyen4 to ensure copy is consistent with what interested them in the first place.
-
-## Valuedriver reference material
-
-* https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1adRX6Vua7LhpZNgG6scqn4uH8Mz3rDVhNGBUU8RFZ2o/edit#slide=id.g7e88ccd42e_0_57
-
-## Notes:
-
-* Please do not run this test for too long so we don't use up our allocated MAU (monthly active users). Last time we ended up with ~ 2000 hits (1,000 each) in ~ 5 days for this particular page which should suffice.
-* Shane Rice suggested removing the form from the popup and leaving it on the page. That's a good suggestion but for efficiency & time sensitivity I would suggest that as a followup and doing this first.",4
-31349309,2020-02-27 16:32:39.221,"Unfiltered posts with ""featured"" appearing on /blog","Before the new /blog design, posts in the `unfiltered` category did not appear on /blog. I think if the post contained `featured: yes` in the frontmatter, it resulted in a blank block on the index page (not ideal, which is why we do have documentation to remove it: https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/marketing/blog/unfiltered/#review)
-
-I noticed before a new featured post was published today that an Unfiltered post (where `featured: yes` had been left in the frontmatter) was appearing as the featured post on /blog.
-
-Is there a way to prevent this? As mentioned above we do ask people not to include this in the frontmatter but it does happen occasionally.",2
-31251369,2020-02-25 12:50:22.349,Update Data Team Workflow Process and Labels,"This issue tracks the Update Data Team Workflow Process and Labels.
-
-
-/cc @gl-website",2
-31214692,2020-02-24 19:22:36.094,Add Hotjar polls to the about website,"Per @sbouchard1 this issue will explore the addition of Hotjar polls to the website as useful way to gather feedback privately in addition to potential use as a KPI.
-
-## Requirements
-
-Starting with just one poll for now:
-
-- [ ] Discuss with other teams where polls have been used, where we might benefit from their use, tips & tricks, etc.
-- [ ] Identify [type of poll](https://help.hotjar.com/hc/en-us/articles/115011624547-Creating-Your-First-Poll).
-- [ ] Identify questions for poll.
-- [ ] Identify pages where the poll will or won't be served.
-- [ ] Identify where the poll will live on the page for desktop/tablet/mobile.
-- [ ] Implement the form.
-- [ ] Create a followup issue to identify next steps (what do we do with the info gathered, what other polls should we make, create documentation, create an issue template for requesting polls, etc...)
-
-## Note
-* Need to be careful Hotjar feedback loops do not negatively impact conversion (funnels, etc)
-* Also need to avoid any conflicts with chat bot (@bethpeterson for awareness)
-
-",2
-31141209,2020-02-21 21:30:39.544,Migrate only/except CI to rules,"Many of our CI jobs in .gitlab-ci.yml use the only/except(advanced) feature described here:
-https://docs.gitlab.com/ee/ci/yaml/#onlyexcept-advanced
-
-This feature is marked as ""an alpha feature, and it is subject to change at any time without prior notice!""
-
-Only/Except is [planned to be deprecated](https://docs.gitlab.com/ee/ci/yaml/#onlyexcept-basic).
-
-Either-way, I think we should migrate all of our CI jobs to use rules instead of the only/except feature. Rules allow for more complex pipelines and will set us up for a monorepo build process.
-https://docs.gitlab.com/ee/ci/yaml/#rules
-
-See also [original issue for rules](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/issues/27863)",2
-30732491,2020-02-13 20:44:28.557,[new webpage] - Topic page - /version-control,"### [COPY](https://docs.google.com/document/d/1T2_3fEZfGPY_1TvpHGYz0Ku_MR7lsO-hMdMvdej4tT4/edit#)
-
-#### What is/are the expected URL(s)
-
-/topics/version-control/
-
-Does this match existing strategies? **Yes** Has keyword research been done? **Yes**
-
-#### Briefly describe the page/flow
-
-This is a topic page to provide awareness-level information. It mirrors the [agile delivery](https://about.gitlab.com/agile-delivery/) page.
-
-#### If applicable, do you have any user journeys, wireframes, prototypes, content/data?
-
-I have a [google doc with a wireframe and content](https://docs.google.com/document/d/1T2_3fEZfGPY_1TvpHGYz0Ku_MR7lsO-hMdMvdej4tT4/edit) (it's still in the planning stage). it'll be similar to this [doc for the agile delivery page](https://docs.google.com/document/d/1UxcdvnRAIKVPln-Fgo_LHKwc8mMQ-QDXGjacO2pqbhU/edit#)
-
-#### What is the primary purpose of this page/flow?
-
-- increase awareness
-- drive people to the pathfactory path
-
-#### What are the KPI (Key Performance Indicators)
-
-- number of sessions
-
-#### What other purposes does this page/flow serve, if any?
-
-- capture emails for campaign funnels
-
-#### What information is this page/flow trying to convey?
-
-- what is scm
-- what are the benefits
-
-### Who is the primary audience? Be specific.
-
-- prospective customers
-- developers
-- devs learning about scm
-
-#### Where do you expect traffic to come from?
-
-- organic search
-- blog posts
-
-#### Please provide some example websites for design guidance.
-
-- https://about.gitlab.com/agile-delivery
-- https://about.gitlab.com/devops
-",3
-30601071,2020-02-10 20:01:53.650,Document kramdown abbreviation syntax in handbook,"As documented in https://gitlab.com/gitlab-com/www-gitlab-com/issues/4762, usability of acronyms is limited when the definition is made in place on a long document. Kramdown already supports a [lightweight markup for abbreviations](https://kramdown.gettalong.org/syntax.html#abbreviations) but it is fairly opaque to the user.
-
-## Proposal
-
-Update the handbook to include specific usage of the Kramdown abbreviation syntax until we can build a more automated solution as recommended in #4762",1
-30600806,2020-02-10 19:50:08.952,Improve styling of acronyms,"## Problem to solve
-
-The display of acronyms defined in the handbook [using Kramdown's abbreviation syntax](https://kramdown.gettalong.org/syntax.html#abbreviations) could use some help. Currently, there is a combination of a dotted border and underline. The styling should make the abbreviation stand out but remain consistent with the rest of the site.
-
-Current display on the handbook:
-
-
-
-## Proposal
-
-Update the styling to remove the double dashed/dotted border. Start by removing the unstyled user agent text-decoration and then evaluate the legibility of the user-defined style.",1
-30297138,2020-02-03 12:07:37.340,Create a message in #handbook if master is broken for the handbook,"## Problem to solve
-
-When the master pipeline fails for a handbook build, the user has often left the page and completely changed context. It can be hours or days before they return to fix the error.
-
-## Proposal
-
-Create an alert in the #handbook Slack channel if the master pipeline fails.",2
-30166515,2020-01-31 18:52:35.209,Investigate feature flag AB testing tools,"Relates to https://gitlab.com/gitlab-com/www-gitlab-com/issues/6151 and https://gitlab.com/groups/gitlab-com/-/epics/290
-
-This issue will investigate if we can use LaunchDarkly as an A/B test tool and attempt implementation.
-
-Always be thinking MVC.
-
-- [x] Sign up for trial accounts and create simple tests to familiarize yourself with the tools.
-- [x] Assess what (if any) additional items are required for implementation.
-- [x] Implement a test to verify the chosen tool is functioning as expected and evaluate the efficacy of the tool.
-- [x] Ensure necessary tracking is in place (analytics, heatmaps, and test significance).
-- [x] Ensure this plays nicely with cookiebot.
-- [x] Document relevant processes and responsibilities related to the new tool(s).
-
-Related to the documentation item, here's a video about [managing feature flags at full scale](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uFW4SSRtkUU).
-
-",6
-30139239,2020-01-31 08:03:28.873,List Categories in Order of Maturity on Maturity page,"As per this issue, https://gitlab.com/gitlab-com/Product/issues/722, we need to update the code that generates the categories on the [Maturity page](https://about.gitlab.com/direction/maturity/) so that categories are list in order of maturity.",1
-30013651,2020-01-28 10:07:12.621,Create a dashboard in Periscope for blog pipeline metrics,"We need to create a pipeline metrics dashboard in Periscope specifically to the blog child pipeline.
-
-The dashboard should be based on the existing one for all of the website: https://app.periscopedata.com/app/gitlab/561277/WIP:-www.gitlab.com-Pipeline-Metrics
-
-This issue is dependent on https://gitlab.com/gitlab-com/www-gitlab-com/issues/6355",2
-29997525,2020-01-27 20:28:08.225,Upgrade www-gitlab-com repo to Ruby 2.6.5,"Upgrade the `www-gitlab-com` repo to Ruby 2.6.5, to match the recent upgrade of the `gitlab-org` repo.
-
-Based on a [slack question](https://gitlab.slack.com/archives/C8HG8D9MY/p1579047921205700), there doesn't appear to already be an issue for this.
-
-This should be straightforward. Looking at the history of `.ruby-version`, it looks like only a couple of changes were needed for the last upgrade.",2
-29927332,2020-01-24 21:17:58.353,Provide a quicker way to open the Web IDE from a Handbook page,"## Problem to solve
-
-Handbook pages offer a quick way to view the source file in the repository or open the source file immediately in the web IDE.
-
-
-
-However, this functionality is found in the last 40px of the page, below the footer, and over 900px removed from the content itself. Users would benefit from a more easily accessible way to transition from reading to editing handbook content.
-
-## Proposal
-
-Building off the work in #6027 we should add two buttons to the popover when text is highlighted on a handbook page. One icon to open the file in the file browser. Another to open it in the web IDE.
-
-Something like this:
-
-
-
-## Implementation details
-
-* The twitter/social sharing options should be visually separated from the editing options in order to distinguish between the intent for each
-* We should not remove the links from the bottom of the page
-
-
-## What comes next?
-
-* The web IDE button should take the user to the exact line of code that matches their selection",1
-29861871,2020-01-22 19:15:11.470,Create separate Middleman instance for blog,"## Who
-The Static Site Editor Group and Brand and Digital Design team are working together to create monorepo structure for www-gitlab-com.
-
-## What
-We are creating a distinct Middleman build for just the blog. By isolating the blog into separate middleman build, we can start to develop blog centric features for just this part of the site.
-
-## Why
-We are doing this so the blog becomes isolated from other parts of the website and deployment time are reduced. This is also a required step toward creating a true monorepo structure for www-gitlab-com
-
-## When
-Based on the [Monorepo Approval issue](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-com/www-gitlab-com/issues/6213) and timeline for deliverables, we need to complete this by Feb 3rd
-
-## References
-
-* [""how to share assets with multiple sites and allow ""local"" overrules?"" - middleman issue](https://github.com/middleman/middleman/issues/1902)",4
-85058963,2021-04-12 16:44:13.915,Blog: Security findings from DevSecOps survey 2021 - May 18,"
-
-## Triage (REQUIRED)
-
-The Inbound Marketing team prioritizes requests that drive results and meet our [goals of generating organic traffic and inquiries](https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/marketing/inbound-marketing/#goals).
-
-Please note that there is a different process for when you want to announce something via the blog. Please see [announcement requests](https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/marketing/corporate-marketing/#requests-for-announcements) in the handbook and open an announcement request issue instead of a blog post issue.
-
-Generally speaking, engineering blog posts that are tutorials/how-tos or which share how we built or debugged something, are popular with our audience. **If your proposed blog post is aligned with our [Attributes of a successful blog post guidelines](https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/marketing/blog/#attributes-of-a-successful-blog-post), you can skip straight to your [proposal](#proposal).**
-
-If you are pitching something outside of those guidelines, please fill in the below to help us prioritize. You can check out [examples of high- and low-performing blog posts to help with your rationale](https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/marketing/inbound-marketing/content/editorial-team/#top-performing-blog-posts).
-
-**This issue fulfills one of these goals:**
-- [ ] Drive traffic to our website
-- [ ] Convert traffic into leads
-- [x] Thought leadership/share expertise
-- [ ] Build relationships with potential customers
-- [ ] Drive long-term results (please explain below in your proposal)
-- [ ] Announcement
- - `Link to announcement request issue (required, see https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/marketing/corporate-marketing/#requests-for-announcements)`
-- [ ] Cross-functional support
- - `Link to OKR (required if this box is checked)`
-
-## Proposal
-
-This blog will go over some of the findings for security in the DevSecOps survey (google doc link shared with me privately https://docs.google.com/document/d/1DdKiGl_1PUSdwPk-go5HaN8AiVncJz2-Zjx5QwYfBKc/edit?usp=sharing)
-
-The CTA will be to the developer report, and this blog _could_ also be used for supporting the GTM-CICD? Not sure, since this isn't really about GitLab as a security solution but just reporting on the results from the community. Maybe awareness level.
-
-
-
-## Roles and Responsibilities
-| Person | Role |
-| ------ | ------ |
-| `@cbuchanan` | requestor |
-| `@vsilverthorne`| editor |
-| `@vsilverthorne` | approver (optional) |
-
-### Checklist
-
-- [ ] If you have a specific publish date in mind (please allow 3 weeks' lead time)
- - [ ] Include it in the issue title and apply the appropriate marketing milestone (e.g. `Mktg: 2021-03-28`)
- - [ ] Give the issue a due date of a minimum of 2 working days prior
- - [ ] If your post is likely to be >2,000 words, give a due date of a minimum of 4 working days prior
-- [ ] If [time sensitive](https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/marketing/blog/#process-for-time-sensitive-posts)
- - [ ] Add ~""Blog: Priority"" label and supplied rationale in description
-- [ ] If wide-spread customer impacting or sensitive, mention `@nwoods` to give her a heads up ASAP, apply the ~""sensitive"" label, and check the [PR handbook](https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/marketing/corporate-marketing/#requests-for-announcements) in case you need to open an announcement request instead of a blog post issue
-- [ ] If the post is about one of GitLab's Technology Partners, including integration partners, mention `@dpduncan`, apply the ~""Partner Marketing"" label, and see the [blog handbook for more on third-party posts](https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/marketing/blog/index.html#third-party-posts)
-- [ ] If the post is about one of GitLab's customers, mention `@FionaOKeeffe`, apply the ~""Customer Reference Program"" label, and see the [blog handbook for more on third-party posts](https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/marketing/blog/index.html#third-party-posts)
-- [ ] Indicate if supporting an event or campaign
-- [ ] Indicate if this post requires additional approval from internal or external parties before publishing (please provide details in a comment)
-
-## Production
-- [x] Requestor to complete issue template (Triage, Proposal, Roles and Responsibilities, Checklist )
-- [x] Issue sent through triage for consideration (approve, backlog, deny)
-- [ ] Issue assigned to requestor to draft blog post and open MR
-- [ ] MR created and linked to issue - issue is now deprecated in favor of MR and will close once MR is complete",2
-84885013,2021-04-08 18:23:15.954,Standard for helper indicators in KPI/RPI charts,"We need to come up with a standard to represent helper indicators for KPI/PIs. Examples
-
-* Number of bugs in timing KPIs
-* Cost/user and % of rev indicators
-
-
-### Proposal
-
-Taking into account https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/engineering/quality/performance-indicators/#average-age-of-open-s1-bugs
-* Instead of 2 lines intersecting it would be best to have
- 1. A bar chart to represent age => purple to indicate primary indicator
- 1. A red line for target age => KPI/PI target
- 1. Area chart represent number of open bugs per month => grey? to indicate supplemental indicator
-* Using purple to designate primary indicator as a constant formatting
-* Grey color for supplemental indicator
-
-#### Mockup
-
-
-@lmai1 @davis_townsend for your review and feedback kindly :slight_smile:",1
-84824918,2021-04-07 22:04:42.522,Enterprise page feature list has repeated bullet points,"This template is for filing a bug report related to the logged out marketing website https://about.gitlab.com/ and company handbook https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/
-
-This is not the correct repository for requests related to docs.gitlab.com, the GitLab product, or other items.
-
-#### What is/are the relevant URL(s)
-
-`https://about.gitlab.com/enterprise/`
-
-#### Briefly describe the bug
-
-Example: A link is broken and when hovering over it the color is the wrong color and poorly aligned.
-
-`See the screenshot below for details. Two sections of the feature list have duplicate bullet points.`
-
-#### Please provide any relevant screenshots or screencasts
-
-How to take a screenshot: https://www.howtogeek.com/205375/how-to-take-screenshots-on-almost-any-device/
-
-
-
-
-",1
-84725809,2021-04-06 15:54:04.118,Blog post: Learn JSON superpowers with jq and automate GitLab workflows (April 19),"
-
-## Triage (REQUIRED)
-
-The Inbound Marketing team prioritizes requests that drive results and meet our [goals of generating organic traffic and inquiries](https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/marketing/inbound-marketing/#goals).
-
-Please note that there is a different process for when you want to announce something via the blog. Please see [announcement requests](https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/marketing/corporate-marketing/#requests-for-announcements) in the handbook and open an announcement request issue instead of a blog post issue.
-
-Generally speaking, engineering blog posts that are tutorials/how-tos or which share how we built or debugged something, are popular with our audience. **If your proposed blog post is aligned with our [Attributes of a successful blog post guidelines](https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/marketing/blog/#attributes-of-a-successful-blog-post), you can skip straight to your [proposal](#proposal).**
-
-If you are pitching something outside of those guidelines, please fill in the below to help us prioritize. You can check out [examples of high- and low-performing blog posts to help with your rationale](https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/marketing/inbound-marketing/content/editorial-team/#top-performing-blog-posts).
-
-**This issue fulfills one of these goals:**
-- [ ] Drive traffic to our website
-- [ ] Convert traffic into leads
-- [ ] Thought leadership/share expertise
-- [ ] Build relationships with potential customers
-- [ ] Drive long-term results (please explain below in your proposal)
-- [ ] Announcement
- - `Link to announcement request issue (required, see https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/marketing/corporate-marketing/#requests-for-announcements)`
-- [ ] Cross-functional support
- - `Link to OKR (required if this box is checked)`
-
-## Proposal
-
-- Updating a post Michael wrote for his personal blog for the GitLab blog.
-- Based on his comment on #trending channel in Slack: https://gitlab.slack.com/archives/C01P65FC56X/p1615993387003400
-- Based on this blog post: https://dnsmichi.at/2021/03/17/learn-json-superpowers-with-jq-automate-gitlab-personal-access-token-management/
-
-@dnsmichi please note that the blog post shouldn't just be a copy/paste of what you originally wrote, but instead should take the content and adapt the information, tone, and writing so it fits in the GitLab blog. I'll be your reviewer so ping me (@skassabian) with any questions or lmk if you need more time.
-
-## Roles and Responsibilities
-| Person | Role |
-| ------ | ------ |
-| `@person` | requestor |
-| `@person`| editor |
-| `@person` | approver (optional) |
-
-### Checklist
-
-- [ ] If you have a specific publish date in mind (please allow 3 weeks' lead time)
- - [ ] Include it in the issue title and apply the appropriate marketing milestone (e.g. `Mktg: 2021-03-28`)
- - [ ] Give the issue a due date of a minimum of 2 working days prior
- - [ ] If your post is likely to be >2,000 words, give a due date of a minimum of 4 working days prior
-- [ ] If [time sensitive](https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/marketing/blog/#process-for-time-sensitive-posts)
- - [ ] Add ~""Blog: Priority"" label and supplied rationale in description
-- [ ] If wide-spread customer impacting or sensitive, mention `@nwoods` to give her a heads up ASAP, apply the ~""sensitive"" label, and check the [PR handbook](https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/marketing/corporate-marketing/#requests-for-announcements) in case you need to open an announcement request instead of a blog post issue
-- [ ] If the post is about one of GitLab's Technology Partners, including integration partners, mention `@dpduncan`, apply the ~""Partner Marketing"" label, and see the [blog handbook for more on third-party posts](https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/marketing/blog/index.html#third-party-posts)
-- [ ] If the post is about one of GitLab's customers, mention `@FionaOKeeffe`, apply the ~""Customer Reference Program"" label, and see the [blog handbook for more on third-party posts](https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/marketing/blog/index.html#third-party-posts)
-- [ ] Indicate if supporting an event or campaign
-- [ ] Indicate if this post requires additional approval from internal or external parties before publishing (please provide details in a comment)
-
-## Production
-- [ ] Requestor to complete issue template (Triage, Proposal, Roles and Responsibilities, Checklist )
-- [ ] Issue sent through triage for consideration (approve, backlog, deny)
-- [ ] Issue assigned to requestor to draft blog post and open MR
-- [ ] MR created and linked to issue - issue is now deprecated in favor of MR and will close once MR is complete",2
-82285601,2021-04-03 07:14:53.886,Update Ruby from 2.7 to 3.0 to use on dev,"We need to continuously keep updating the build/test environments of the repository itself.
-
-Relates to gitlab-org&5149 (initiative upgrading Ruby 2.7 to 3.0 in GitLab product)
-
-### cf.
-
-- Similar update on build/test: #10917",32
-81878126,2021-03-29 21:52:44.837,Blog post: Slippers blog template review (May 3),"
-
-## Triage (REQUIRED)
-
-The Inbound Marketing team prioritizes requests that drive results and meet our [goals of generating organic traffic and inquiries](https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/marketing/inbound-marketing/#goals).
-
-Please note that there is a different process for when you want to announce something via the blog. Please see [announcement requests](https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/marketing/corporate-marketing/#requests-for-announcements) in the handbook and open an announcement request issue instead of a blog post issue.
-
-Generally speaking, engineering blog posts that are tutorials/how-tos or which share how we built or debugged something, are popular with our audience. **If your proposed blog post is aligned with our [Attributes of a successful blog post guidelines](https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/marketing/blog/#attributes-of-a-successful-blog-post), you can skip straight to your [proposal](#proposal).**
-
-If you are pitching something outside of those guidelines, please fill in the below to help us prioritize. You can check out [examples of high- and low-performing blog posts to help with your rationale](https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/marketing/inbound-marketing/content/editorial-team/#top-performing-blog-posts).
-
-**This issue fulfills one of these goals:**
-- [ ] Drive traffic to our website
-- [ ] Convert traffic into leads
-- [x] Thought leadership/share expertise
-- [ ] Build relationships with potential customers
-- [ ] Drive long-term results (please explain below in your proposal)
-- [ ] Announcement
- - `Link to announcement request issue (required, see https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/marketing/corporate-marketing/#requests-for-announcements)`
-- [ ] Cross-functional support
- - `Link to OKR (required if this box is checked)`
-
-## Proposal
-
-
-
-The [digital experience team](https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/marketing/inbound-marketing/digital-experience/) recently launched the [new Slippers blog template](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-com/marketing/inbound-marketing/growth/-/issues/1146) for the marketing blog.
-
-I have two main points I'd like to write about, and I'd be happy to take feedback on which direction to pursue, or if it makes sense to write two separate posts, or if one post could contain both points.
-
-1. We used GitLab's [iteration value](https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/values/#iteration), along with GitLab's tool to [promote an issue to an epic](https://docs.gitlab.com/ee/user/group/epics/manage_epics.html#promote-an-issue-to-an-epic) to iterate on an issue we realized was too large in scope by [promoting it to the blog post template epic](https://gitlab.com/groups/gitlab-com/marketing/inbound-marketing/-/epics/296). Once we did this, we were able to also [collaborate](https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/values/#collaboration) more effectively. I'd like to highlight how GitLab's iteration and collaboration values are embodied by the GitLab product's technical capabilities.
-1. We had a problem where existing CSS was conflicting with the Slippers design system, and since we didn't have the header/footer ready yet, we couldn't just disable them all. So we used the [shadow DOM](https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/Web_Components/Using_shadow_DOM) to encapsulate CSS entirely, along with [templates and slots](https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/Web_Components/Using_templates_and_slots) to write semantic HTML in erb or HAML templates as desired, all tied together with [custom elements](https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/Web_Components/Using_custom_elements). In addition to the values piece, I'd like to showcase how we used Web Components to solve challenges in a way that allowed us to iterate quickly. We have lots of the content [written as documentation](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-com/www-gitlab-com/blob/0c3b195ee49d4283fcb8330f987b3c039d0f2cff/doc/slippers-blog-template.md#L22), which could be rewritten in an approachable way for the blog.
-
-## Roles and Responsibilities
-| Person | Role |
-| ------ | ------ |
-| `@tywilliams` | requestor |
-| `@person`| editor |
-| `@person` | approver (optional) |
-
-### Checklist
-
-- [ ] If you have a specific publish date in mind (please allow 3 weeks' lead time)
- - [ ] Include it in the issue title and apply the appropriate marketing milestone (e.g. `Mktg: 2021-03-28`)
- - [ ] Give the issue a due date of a minimum of 2 working days prior
- - [ ] If your post is likely to be >2,000 words, give a due date of a minimum of 4 working days prior
-- [ ] If [time sensitive](https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/marketing/blog/#process-for-time-sensitive-posts)
- - [ ] Add ~""Blog: Priority"" label and supplied rationale in description
-- [ ] If wide-spread customer impacting or sensitive, mention `@nwoods` to give her a heads up ASAP, apply the ~""sensitive"" label, and check the [PR handbook](https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/marketing/corporate-marketing/#requests-for-announcements) in case you need to open an announcement request instead of a blog post issue
-- [ ] If the post is about one of GitLab's Technology Partners, including integration partners, mention `@dpduncan`, apply the ~""Partner Marketing"" label, and see the [blog handbook for more on third-party posts](https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/marketing/blog/index.html#third-party-posts)
-- [ ] If the post is about one of GitLab's customers, mention `@FionaOKeeffe`, apply the ~""Customer Reference Program"" label, and see the [blog handbook for more on third-party posts](https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/marketing/blog/index.html#third-party-posts)
-- [ ] Indicate if supporting an event or campaign
-- [ ] Indicate if this post requires additional approval from internal or external parties before publishing (please provide details in a comment)
-
-## Production
-- [x] Requestor to complete issue template (Triage, Proposal, Roles and Responsibilities, Checklist )
-- [ ] Issue sent through triage for consideration (approve, backlog, deny)
-- [ ] Issue assigned to requestor to draft blog post and open MR
-- [ ] MR created and linked to issue - issue is now deprecated in favor of MR and will close once MR is complete",2
-81517837,2021-03-23 19:15:42.945,How can we shift accessibility left? (June 3),"
-
-## Triage (REQUIRED)
-
-The Inbound Marketing team prioritizes requests that drive results and meet our [goals of generating organic traffic and inquiries](https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/marketing/inbound-marketing/#goals).
-
-Please note that there is a different process for when you want to announce something via the blog. Please see [announcement requests](https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/marketing/corporate-marketing/#requests-for-announcements) in the handbook and open an announcement request issue instead of a blog post issue.
-
-Generally speaking, engineering blog posts that are tutorials/how-tos or which share how we built or debugged something, are popular with our audience. **If your proposed blog post is aligned with our [Attributes of a successful blog post guidelines](https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/marketing/blog/#attributes-of-a-successful-blog-post), you can skip straight to your [proposal](#proposal).**
-
-If you are pitching something outside of those guidelines, please fill in the below to help us prioritize. You can check out [examples of high- and low-performing blog posts to help with your rationale](https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/marketing/inbound-marketing/content/editorial-team/#top-performing-blog-posts).
-
-**This issue fulfills one of these goals:**
-- [x] Drive traffic to our website
-- [ ] Convert traffic into leads
-- [x] Thought leadership/share expertise
-- [ ] Build relationships with potential customers
-- [ ] Drive long-term results (please explain below in your proposal)
-- [ ] Announcement
- - `Link to announcement request issue (required, see https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/marketing/corporate-marketing/#requests-for-announcements)`
-- [ ] Cross-functional support
- - `Link to OKR (required if this box is checked)`
-
-## Proposal
-
-When of the major shortcomings of accessibility in software development is that it is something tacked on at the end of the software development lifecycle. By shifting accessibility left, as in, thinking about building accessible software at the first stage of the SDLC, can be a game-changer for accessible software development. This blog post talks about what accessible software development looks like and how companies like GitLab – a product built for developers, by developers, to help developers build better software – can look like.
-
-## Roles and Responsibilities
-| Person | Role |
-| ------ | ------ |
-| `@person` | requestor |
-| `@person`| editor |
-| `@person` | approver (optional) |
-
-### Checklist
-
-- [x] If you have a specific publish date in mind (please allow 3 weeks' lead time)
- - [x] Include it in the issue title and apply the appropriate marketing milestone (e.g. `Mktg: 2021-03-28`)
- - [x] Give the issue a due date of a minimum of 2 working days prior
- - [ ] If your post is likely to be >2,000 words, give a due date of a minimum of 4 working days prior
-- [ ] If [time sensitive](https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/marketing/blog/#process-for-time-sensitive-posts)
- - [ ] Add ~""Blog: Priority"" label and supplied rationale in description
-- [ ] If wide-spread customer impacting or sensitive, mention `@nwoods` to give her a heads up ASAP, apply the ~""sensitive"" label, and check the [PR handbook](https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/marketing/corporate-marketing/#requests-for-announcements) in case you need to open an announcement request instead of a blog post issue
-- [ ] If the post is about one of GitLab's Technology Partners, including integration partners, mention `@dpduncan`, apply the ~""Partner Marketing"" label, and see the [blog handbook for more on third-party posts](https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/marketing/blog/index.html#third-party-posts)
-- [ ] If the post is about one of GitLab's customers, mention `@FionaOKeeffe`, apply the ~""Customer Reference Program"" label, and see the [blog handbook for more on third-party posts](https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/marketing/blog/index.html#third-party-posts)
-- [ ] Indicate if supporting an event or campaign
-- [ ] Indicate if this post requires additional approval from internal or external parties before publishing (please provide details in a comment)
-
-## Production
-- [ ] Requestor to complete issue template (Triage, Proposal, Roles and Responsibilities, Checklist )
-- [ ] Issue sent through triage for consideration (approve, backlog, deny)
-- [ ] Issue assigned to requestor to draft blog post and open MR
-- [ ] MR created and linked to issue - issue is now deprecated in favor of MR and will close once MR is complete",3
-81453373,2021-03-22 22:27:21.144,Feature Unfiltered Post: How we tested a feature that affected GitLab,"
-
-
-
-How we tested a feature that affected (almost) all parts of GitLab
-https://about.gitlab.com/blog/2021/03/17/collaborating-on-a-cross-stage-feature/",2
-81136345,2021-03-17 21:22:04.355,Blog post: YAML tips for CI/CD (July 6),"
-
-## Triage (REQUIRED)
-
-The Inbound Marketing team prioritizes requests that drive results and meet our [goals of generating organic traffic and inquiries](https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/marketing/inbound-marketing/#goals).
-
-Please note that there is a different process for when you want to announce something via the blog. Please see [announcement requests](https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/marketing/corporate-marketing/#requests-for-announcements) in the handbook and open an announcement request issue instead of a blog post issue.
-
-Generally speaking, engineering blog posts that are tutorials/how-tos or which share how we built or debugged something, are popular with our audience. **If your proposed blog post is aligned with our [Attributes of a successful blog post guidelines](https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/marketing/blog/#attributes-of-a-successful-blog-post), you can skip straight to your [proposal](#proposal).**
-
-If you are pitching something outside of those guidelines, please fill in the below to help us prioritize. You can check out [examples of high- and low-performing blog posts to help with your rationale](https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/marketing/inbound-marketing/content/editorial-team/#top-performing-blog-posts).
-
-**This issue fulfills one of these goals:**
-- [x] Drive traffic to our website
-- [ ] Convert traffic into leads
-- [x] Thought leadership/share expertise
-- [ ] Build relationships with potential customers
-- [ ] Drive long-term results (please explain below in your proposal)
-- [ ] Announcement
- - `Link to announcement request issue (required, see https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/marketing/corporate-marketing/#requests-for-announcements)`
-- [ ] Cross-functional support
- - `Link to OKR (required if this box is checked)`
-
-## Proposal
-
-Our first blog post about YAML tricks to speed up pipelines was so popular we're thinking of doing a follow-up post that explores different tips for developers on how to use YAML for CI/CD. @cbuchanan @dnsmichi do you have any ideas for team members who might know a lot about this topic that can write a blog post or can be interviewed?
-
-## Roles and Responsibilities
-| Person | Role |
-| ------ | ------ |
-| `@person` | requestor |
-| `@person`| editor |
-| `@person` | approver (optional) |
-
-**Note @skassabian will be OOO this week so please assign to an alternative editor, such as @bmatturro or @mackanic**
-
-### Checklist
-
-- [ ] If you have a specific publish date in mind (please allow 3 weeks' lead time)
- - [ ] Include it in the issue title and apply the appropriate marketing milestone (e.g. `Mktg: 2021-03-28`)
- - [ ] Give the issue a due date of a minimum of 2 working days prior
- - [ ] If your post is likely to be >2,000 words, give a due date of a minimum of 4 working days prior
-- [ ] If [time sensitive](https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/marketing/blog/#process-for-time-sensitive-posts)
- - [ ] Add ~""Blog: Priority"" label and supplied rationale in description
-- [ ] If wide-spread customer impacting or sensitive, mention `@nwoods` to give her a heads up ASAP, apply the ~""sensitive"" label, and check the [PR handbook](https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/marketing/corporate-marketing/#requests-for-announcements) in case you need to open an announcement request instead of a blog post issue
-- [ ] If the post is about one of GitLab's Technology Partners, including integration partners, mention `@dpduncan`, apply the ~""Partner Marketing"" label, and see the [blog handbook for more on third-party posts](https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/marketing/blog/index.html#third-party-posts)
-- [ ] If the post is about one of GitLab's customers, mention `@FionaOKeeffe`, apply the ~""Customer Reference Program"" label, and see the [blog handbook for more on third-party posts](https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/marketing/blog/index.html#third-party-posts)
-- [ ] Indicate if supporting an event or campaign
-- [ ] Indicate if this post requires additional approval from internal or external parties before publishing (please provide details in a comment)
-
-## Production
-- [ ] Requestor to complete issue template (Triage, Proposal, Roles and Responsibilities, Checklist )
-- [ ] Issue sent through triage for consideration (approve, backlog, deny)
-- [ ] Issue assigned to requestor to draft blog post and open MR
-- [ ] MR created and linked to issue - issue is now deprecated in favor of MR and will close once MR is complete",3
-81126064,2021-03-17 17:43:05.179,Blog Post: How does open source relate to accessibility? (April 14),"
-
-## Triage (REQUIRED)
-
-The Inbound Marketing team prioritizes requests that drive results and meet our [goals of generating organic traffic and inquiries](https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/marketing/inbound-marketing/#goals).
-
-Please note that there is a different process for when you want to announce something via the blog. Please see [announcement requests](https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/marketing/corporate-marketing/#requests-for-announcements) in the handbook and open an announcement request issue instead of a blog post issue.
-
-Generally speaking, engineering blog posts that are tutorials/how-tos or which share how we built or debugged something, are popular with our audience. **If your proposed blog post is aligned with our [Attributes of a successful blog post guidelines](https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/marketing/blog/#attributes-of-a-successful-blog-post), you can skip straight to your [proposal](#proposal).**
-
-If you are pitching something outside of those guidelines, please fill in the below to help us prioritize. You can check out [examples of high- and low-performing blog posts to help with your rationale](https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/marketing/inbound-marketing/content/editorial-team/#top-performing-blog-posts).
-
-**This issue fulfills one of these goals:**
-- [x] Drive traffic to our website
-- [ ] Convert traffic into leads
-- [x] Thought leadership/share expertise
-- [ ] Build relationships with potential customers
-- [ ] Drive long-term results (please explain below in your proposal)
-- [ ] Announcement
- - `Link to announcement request issue (required, see https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/marketing/corporate-marketing/#requests-for-announcements)`
-- [ ] Cross-functional support
- - `Link to OKR (required if this box is checked)`
-
-## Proposal
-
-I'd like to explore how accessibility in software development relates to the open source community. Open source software is designed so everyone can contribute (and ideally, use) software, and accessibility in software development is about building and designing software to be inclusive to users of differing abilities.
-
-## Roles and Responsibilities
-| Person | Role |
-| ------ | ------ |
-| `@person` | requestor |
-| `@person`| editor |
-| `@person` | approver (optional) |
-
-### Checklist
-
-- [ ] If you have a specific publish date in mind (please allow 3 weeks' lead time)
- - [ ] Include it in the issue title and apply the appropriate marketing milestone (e.g. `Mktg: 2021-03-28`)
- - [ ] Give the issue a due date of a minimum of 2 working days prior
- - [ ] If your post is likely to be >2,000 words, give a due date of a minimum of 4 working days prior
-- [ ] If [time sensitive](https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/marketing/blog/#process-for-time-sensitive-posts)
- - [ ] Add ~""Blog: Priority"" label and supplied rationale in description
-- [ ] If wide-spread customer impacting or sensitive, mention `@nwoods` to give her a heads up ASAP, apply the ~""sensitive"" label, and check the [PR handbook](https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/marketing/corporate-marketing/#requests-for-announcements) in case you need to open an announcement request instead of a blog post issue
-- [ ] If the post is about one of GitLab's Technology Partners, including integration partners, mention `@dpduncan`, apply the ~""Partner Marketing"" label, and see the [blog handbook for more on third-party posts](https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/marketing/blog/index.html#third-party-posts)
-- [ ] If the post is about one of GitLab's customers, mention `@FionaOKeeffe`, apply the ~""Customer Reference Program"" label, and see the [blog handbook for more on third-party posts](https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/marketing/blog/index.html#third-party-posts)
-- [ ] Indicate if supporting an event or campaign
-- [ ] Indicate if this post requires additional approval from internal or external parties before publishing (please provide details in a comment)
-
-## Production
-- [ ] Requestor to complete issue template (Triage, Proposal, Roles and Responsibilities, Checklist )
-- [ ] Issue sent through triage for consideration (approve, backlog, deny)
-- [ ] Issue assigned to requestor to draft blog post and open MR
-- [ ] MR created and linked to issue - issue is now deprecated in favor of MR and will close once MR is complete",4
-81123516,2021-03-17 16:55:46.895,Brandon write a blog post,"The goal is to represent our team by contributing more content. Possible topics on Brandon's mind include home office networking, custom keyboards, time management, writing documentation, etc.",2
-80893852,2021-03-15 00:54:53.601,Update merging during broken `master` process,"This issue is tracking progress on https://gitlab.com/gitlab-com/www-gitlab-com/-/merge_requests/77343.
-
-Post-merge checklist:
-
-- [x] Add a note to the Engineering Week in Review about the change.
-- [ ] Update our [code review](https://docs.gitlab.com/ee/development/code_review.html) process and links to the new process.",1
-80579941,2021-03-09 17:50:33.641,Feature Unfiltered Post: Slippers design system,"
-
-
-
-https://about.gitlab.com/blog/2021/03/05/starting-from-the-start-slippers-design-system/ @smcguinness1 thanks for writing this blog post! Moving to the main blog.",1
-80467780,2021-03-08 12:03:39.760,Feature Production-Grade Infrastructure and DevSecOps in Under Five Minutes on blog,"
-
-Feature https://about.gitlab.com/blog/2021/02/24/production-grade-infra-devsecops-with-five-minute-production/ on main blog
-
-(FYI @skassabian)",1
-80112866,2021-03-02 17:32:59.150,Draft: Iteration and code reviews - prt 3 (Mar 18),"
-
-## Triage (REQUIRED)
-
-The Inbound Marketing team prioritizes requests that drive results and meet our [goals of generating organic traffic and inquiries](https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/marketing/inbound-marketing/#goals).
-
-Please note that there is a different process for when you want to announce something via the blog. Please see [announcement requests](https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/marketing/corporate-marketing/#requests-for-announcements) in the handbook and open an announcement request issue instead of a blog post issue.
-
-Generally speaking, engineering blog posts that are tutorials/how-tos or which share how we built or debugged something, are popular with our audience. **If your proposed blog post is aligned with our [Attributes of a successful blog post guidelines](https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/marketing/blog/#attributes-of-a-successful-blog-post), you can skip straight to your [proposal](#proposal).**
-
-If you are pitching something outside of those guidelines, please fill in the below to help us prioritize. You can check out [examples of high- and low-performing blog posts to help with your rationale](https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/marketing/inbound-marketing/content/editorial-team/#top-performing-blog-posts).
-
-**This issue fulfills one of these goals:**
-- [x] Drive traffic to our website
-- [ ] Convert traffic into leads
-- [x] Thought leadership/share expertise
-- [ ] Build relationships with potential customers
-- [ ] Drive long-term results (please explain below in your proposal)
-- [ ] Announcement
- - `Link to announcement request issue (required, see https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/marketing/corporate-marketing/#requests-for-announcements)`
-- [ ] Cross-functional support
- - `Link to OKR (required if this box is checked)`
-
-## Proposal
-
-
-
-## Roles and Responsibilities
-| Person | Role |
-| ------ | ------ |
-| `@person` | requestor |
-| `@person`| editor |
-| `@person` | approver (optional) |
-
-### Checklist
-
-- [x] If you have a specific publish date in mind (please allow 3 weeks' lead time)
- - [x] Include it in the issue title and apply the appropriate weekly milestone (e.g. `Fri: Mar. 5, 2021`)
- - [x] Give the issue a due date of a minimum of 2 working days prior
- - [ ] If your post is likely to be >2,000 words, give a due date of a minimum of 4 working days prior
-- [ ] If [time sensitive](https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/marketing/blog/#process-for-time-sensitive-posts)
- - [ ] Add ~""Blog: Priority"" label and supplied rationale in description
-- [ ] If wide-spread customer impacting or sensitive, mention `@nwoods` to give her a heads up ASAP, apply the ~""sensitive"" label, and check the [PR handbook](https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/marketing/corporate-marketing/#requests-for-announcements) in case you need to open an announcement request instead of a blog post issue
-- [ ] If the post is about one of GitLab's Technology Partners, including integration partners, mention `@arashidi`, apply the ~""Partner Marketing"" label, and see the [blog handbook for more on third-party posts](https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/marketing/blog/index.html#third-party-posts)
-- [ ] If the post is about one of GitLab's customers, mention `@FionaOKeeffe`, apply the ~""Customer Reference Program"" label, and see the [blog handbook for more on third-party posts](https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/marketing/blog/index.html#third-party-posts)
-- [ ] Indicate if supporting an event or campaign
-- [ ] Indicate if this post requires additional approval from internal or external parties before publishing (please provide details in a comment)
-
-## Production
-- [ ] Requestor to complete issue template (Triage, Proposal, Roles and Responsibilities, Checklist )
-- [ ] Issue sent through triage for consideration (approve, backlog, deny)
-- [ ] Issue assigned to requestor to draft blog post and open MR
-- [ ] MR created and linked to issue - issue is now deprecated in favor of MR and will close once MR is complete",2
-80111935,2021-03-02 17:19:52.503,Draft: How and why to use patch files for code review - prt 2 (Mar 15),"
-
-## Triage (REQUIRED)
-
-The Inbound Marketing team prioritizes requests that drive results and meet our [goals of generating organic traffic and inquiries](https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/marketing/inbound-marketing/#goals).
-
-Please note that there is a different process for when you want to announce something via the blog. Please see [announcement requests](https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/marketing/corporate-marketing/#requests-for-announcements) in the handbook and open an announcement request issue instead of a blog post issue.
-
-Generally speaking, engineering blog posts that are tutorials/how-tos or which share how we built or debugged something, are popular with our audience. **If your proposed blog post is aligned with our [Attributes of a successful blog post guidelines](https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/marketing/blog/#attributes-of-a-successful-blog-post), you can skip straight to your [proposal](#proposal).**
-
-If you are pitching something outside of those guidelines, please fill in the below to help us prioritize. You can check out [examples of high- and low-performing blog posts to help with your rationale](https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/marketing/inbound-marketing/content/editorial-team/#top-performing-blog-posts).
-
-**This issue fulfills one of these goals:**
-- [x] Drive traffic to our website
-- [ ] Convert traffic into leads
-- [x] Thought leadership/share expertise
-- [ ] Build relationships with potential customers
-- [ ] Drive long-term results (please explain below in your proposal)
-- [ ] Announcement
- - `Link to announcement request issue (required, see https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/marketing/corporate-marketing/#requests-for-announcements)`
-- [ ] Cross-functional support
- - `Link to OKR (required if this box is checked)`
-
-## Proposal
-
-
-
-## Roles and Responsibilities
-| Person | Role |
-| ------ | ------ |
-| `@person` | requestor |
-| `@person`| editor |
-| `@person` | approver (optional) |
-
-### Checklist
-
-- [x] If you have a specific publish date in mind (please allow 3 weeks' lead time)
- - [x] Include it in the issue title and apply the appropriate weekly milestone (e.g. `Fri: Mar. 5, 2021`)
- - [x] Give the issue a due date of a minimum of 2 working days prior
- - [ ] If your post is likely to be >2,000 words, give a due date of a minimum of 4 working days prior
-- [ ] If [time sensitive](https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/marketing/blog/#process-for-time-sensitive-posts)
- - [ ] Add ~""Blog: Priority"" label and supplied rationale in description
-- [ ] If wide-spread customer impacting or sensitive, mention `@nwoods` to give her a heads up ASAP, apply the ~""sensitive"" label, and check the [PR handbook](https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/marketing/corporate-marketing/#requests-for-announcements) in case you need to open an announcement request instead of a blog post issue
-- [ ] If the post is about one of GitLab's Technology Partners, including integration partners, mention `@arashidi`, apply the ~""Partner Marketing"" label, and see the [blog handbook for more on third-party posts](https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/marketing/blog/index.html#third-party-posts)
-- [ ] If the post is about one of GitLab's customers, mention `@FionaOKeeffe`, apply the ~""Customer Reference Program"" label, and see the [blog handbook for more on third-party posts](https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/marketing/blog/index.html#third-party-posts)
-- [ ] Indicate if supporting an event or campaign
-- [ ] Indicate if this post requires additional approval from internal or external parties before publishing (please provide details in a comment)
-
-## Production
-- [ ] Requestor to complete issue template (Triage, Proposal, Roles and Responsibilities, Checklist )
-- [ ] Issue sent through triage for consideration (approve, backlog, deny)
-- [ ] Issue assigned to requestor to draft blog post and open MR
-- [ ] MR created and linked to issue - issue is now deprecated in favor of MR and will close once MR is complete",2
-79833861,2021-02-25 21:24:13.306,Git default branch name change blog post,"
-
-## Triage (REQUIRED)
-
-The Inbound Marketing team prioritizes requests that drive results and meet our [goals of generating organic traffic and inquiries](https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/marketing/inbound-marketing/#goals).
-
-Please note that there is a different process for when you want to announce something via the blog. Please see [announcement requests](https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/marketing/corporate-marketing/#requests-for-announcements) in the handbook and open an announcement request issue instead of a blog post issue.
-
-Generally speaking, engineering blog posts that are tutorials/how-tos or which share how we built or debugged something, are popular with our audience. **If your proposed blog post is aligned with our [Attributes of a successful blog post guidelines](https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/marketing/blog/#attributes-of-a-successful-blog-post), you can skip straight to your [proposal](#proposal).**
-
-If you are pitching something outside of those guidelines, please fill in the below to help us prioritize. You can check out [examples of high- and low-performing blog posts to help with your rationale](https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/marketing/inbound-marketing/content/editorial-team/#top-performing-blog-posts).
-
-**This issue fulfills one of these goals:**
-- [ ] Drive traffic to our website
-- [ ] Convert traffic into leads
-- [ ] Thought leadership/share expertise
-- [ ] Build relationships with potential customers
-- [ ] Drive long-term results (please explain below in your proposal)
-- [x] Announcement
- - https://gitlab.com/gitlab-com/marketing/corporate_marketing/corporate-marketing/-/issues/3211
-- [ ] Cross-functional support
- - `Link to OKR (required if this box is checked)`
-
-## Proposal
-
-
-
-## Roles and Responsibilities
-| Person | Role |
-| ------ | ------ |
-| `@person` | requestor |
-| `@person`| editor |
-| `@person` | approver (optional) |
-
-### Checklist
-
-- [ ] If you have a specific publish date in mind (please allow 3 weeks' lead time)
- - [ ] Include it in the issue title and apply the appropriate weekly milestone (e.g. `Fri: Mar. 5, 2021`)
- - [ ] Give the issue a due date of a minimum of 2 working days prior
- - [ ] If your post is likely to be >2,000 words, give a due date of a minimum of 4 working days prior
-- [ ] If [time sensitive](https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/marketing/blog/#process-for-time-sensitive-posts)
- - [ ] Add ~""Blog: Priority"" label and supplied rationale in description
-- [ ] If wide-spread customer impacting or sensitive, mention `@nwoods` to give her a heads up ASAP, apply the ~""sensitive"" label, and check the [PR handbook](https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/marketing/corporate-marketing/#requests-for-announcements) in case you need to open an announcement request instead of a blog post issue
-- [ ] If the post is about one of GitLab's Technology Partners, including integration partners, mention `@arashidi`, apply the ~""Partner Marketing"" label, and see the [blog handbook for more on third-party posts](https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/marketing/blog/index.html#third-party-posts)
-- [ ] If the post is about one of GitLab's customers, mention `@FionaOKeeffe`, apply the ~""Customer Reference Program"" label, and see the [blog handbook for more on third-party posts](https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/marketing/blog/index.html#third-party-posts)
-- [ ] Indicate if supporting an event or campaign
-- [ ] Indicate if this post requires additional approval from internal or external parties before publishing (please provide details in a comment)
-
-## Production
-- [ ] Requestor to complete issue template (Triage, Proposal, Roles and Responsibilities, Checklist )
-- [ ] Issue sent through triage for consideration (approve, backlog, deny)
-- [ ] Issue assigned to requestor to draft blog post and open MR
-- [ ] MR created and linked to issue - issue is now deprecated in favor of MR and will close once MR is complete",1
-79743584,2021-02-24 20:28:29.516,Reduce youtube iframe ad tracking network requests,"This is an attempt to reduce network calls related to youtube iframes and adsense.
-
-",1
-79726562,2021-02-24 16:07:34.308,Adjust MTTP KPI to only count working days,"Original Issue Link: https://gitlab.com/gitlab-com/gl-infra/infrastructure/-/issues/12524
-
-> Currently MTTP shows the time MRs take to reach production, measured across the entire month however this gives an inaccurate view because we intentionally don't deploy on weekends.
-
->We should adjust https://app.periscopedata.com/app/gitlab/764878/MTTP-KPI-Dashboard?widget=10055732 to only count working days within a month to give a true measure of MTTP.
-
->@davis_townsend do you think we could make this change?",3
-79702549,2021-02-24 10:56:23.372,"Feature ""Redesigning our docs""","
-
-Feature https://about.gitlab.com/blog/2021/02/12/redesigning-our-docs/ on main blog.",1
-79676799,2021-02-24 02:10:21.559,Update Ruby from 2.7 to 3.0 to use on build/test,"We need to continuously keep updating the build/test environments of the repository itself.
-
-Relates to gitlab-org&5149 (initiative upgrading Ruby 2.7 to 3.0 in GitLab product)
-
-### Prerequisites
-
-- [x] gitlab-org/gitlab-build-images!372
-
-### TODO
-
-- [x] !75872
-- [x] !78849
-- [x] !79022
-- [x] !79284
-- [x] !79480
-- [x] !79484
-- [x] !79491
-- [x] [middleman/middleman#2460](https://github.com/middleman/middleman/pull/2460)
-- [x] [middleman/middleman#2462](https://github.com/middleman/middleman/pull/2462)
-- [x] !78850
-
-### cf.
-
-- Previous update: !73459",128
-79583633,2021-02-22 20:21:11.146,Blog update: Add GitOps tag to relevant blog posts,"I added a ""gitops"" tag to the blog handbook and now need to add the tag to past published, relevant blog posts:
-
-- https://about.gitlab.com/blog/2020/12/17/gitlab-for-cicd-agile-gitops-cloudnative/
-- https://about.gitlab.com/blog/2020/07/14/gitops-next-big-thing-automation/
-- https://about.gitlab.com/blog/2020/04/17/why-gitops-should-be-workflow-of-choice/
-- https://about.gitlab.com/blog/2019/11/18/gitops-prt-3/
-- https://about.gitlab.com/blog/2019/11/12/gitops-part-2/
-- https://about.gitlab.com/blog/2019/11/04/gitlab-for-gitops-prt-1/
-- https://about.gitlab.com/blog/2019/10/28/optimize-gitops-workflow/",1
-79583632,2021-02-22 20:21:07.887,DE ENG: Marketo privacy subprocessors form,"## This issue relates to https://gitlab.com/gitlab-com/marketing/marketing-operations/-/issues/4263#note_513238603
-
-URL: https://about.gitlab.com/privacy/subprocessors/#sign-up
-
-Steps to reproduce: Submit the form.
-
-Observed: Page reloads and sends to /pricing/
-
-Expected: For says ""thank you for submitting"" with no page redirect.
-
-
-
-",2
-79561318,2021-02-22 14:28:24.660,Feature Unfiltered post: Meet Pipeline Editor,"
-
-Opening to consider featuring the following Unfiltered post: https://about.gitlab.com/blog/2021/02/22/pipeline-editor-overview/",1
-79427097,2021-02-19 17:07:47.878,Handbook update: Add GitOps tag,"
-
-#### Briefly describe the update
-
-I realized we should probably add a 'gitops' tag to the [Blog Handbook](https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/marketing/blog/#tags). I'm not sure how to do add a tag, could we work on this during our next 1:1 @rebecca?
-
-
-
-",1
-78693536,2021-02-09 07:06:09.978,Update bundler from 1.17.x to 2.1.4 on Ruby 2.7,Update bundler in `Gemfile.lock` from 1.17.x to 2.1.4 (the default version of Bundler bundled in Ruby 2.7.2) after !73459 and !74347.,1
-78421095,2021-02-04 11:24:10.586,Feature Unfiltered post: This SRE attempted to roll out an HAProxy config change. You won't believe what happened next...,"
-
-Review https://about.gitlab.com/blog/2021/01/14/this-sre-attempted-to-roll-out-an-haproxy-change/ for featuring on main blog.",1
-78219061,2021-02-01 16:10:54.507,Blog post: Roundup of debugging stories - 2021-03-31,"
-
-### Proposal
-
-Roundup of the best stories coming out of https://gitlab.com/gitlab-com/marketing/corporate_marketing/corporate-marketing/-/issues/4077.
-
-Inspired by https://boleary.dev/blog/2021-01-27-the-purse-caper-debugging-can-be-hard.html.
-
-### Checklist
-
-- [ ] If you have a specific publish date in mind (please allow 3 weeks' lead time)
- - [ ] Include it in the issue title and apply the appropriate milestone (e.g. `Blogs October 2020`)
- - [ ] Give the issue a due date of a minimum of 2 working days prior
- - [ ] If your post is likely to be >2,000 words, give a due date of a minimum of 4 working days prior
-- [ ] If [time sensitive](https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/marketing/blog/#process-for-time-sensitive-posts)
- - [ ] Add ~""Blog: Priority"" label and supplied rationale in description
- - [ ] Mention `@rebecca` to give her a heads up ASAP
-- [ ] If wide-spread customer impacting or sensitive, mention `@nwoods` to give her a heads up ASAP, apply the ~""sensitive"" label, and check the [PR handbook](https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/marketing/corporate-marketing/#requests-for-announcements) in case you need to open an announcement request instead of a blog post issue
-- [ ] If the post is about one of GitLab's Technology Partners, including integration partners, mention `@arashidi`, apply the ~""Partner Marketing"" label, and see the [blog handbook for more on third-party posts](https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/marketing/blog/index.html#third-party-posts)
-- [ ] If the post is about one of GitLab's customers, mention `@FionaOKeeffe`, apply the ~""Customer Reference Program"" label, and see the [blog handbook for more on third-party posts](https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/marketing/blog/index.html#third-party-posts)
-- [ ] Indicate if supporting an event or campaign
-- [ ] Indicate if this post requires additional approval from internal or external parties before publishing (please provide details in a comment)",2
-77583774,2021-01-21 04:50:25.141,"Create ""What is cloud native continuous integration"" web article","
-
-#### What problem(s) are we trying to solve? What are the project goals?
-
-This will be a web article describing how to implement continuous integration that will be linked from the [CI/CD topics page](https://about.gitlab.com/topics/ci-cd/)
-
-#### Briefly describe your request
-
-Create a web article nested within the CI/CD topics page
-
-#### What is/are the relevant URL(s)
-
-https://about.gitlab.com/topics/ci-cd/cloud-native-continuous-integration
-
-
-#### Please identify the directly responsible individual (DRI), stakeholders, and roles
-
-
-
-#### Does this request require a form to capture registrations for a gated asset?
-
-- [x] No
-- [ ] Yes
-
-
-
-#### What are the project should-haves?
-
-This page should have the look and layout of other topics pages and sections at the bottom for listing other resources: eBooks, blogs, whitepapers, webcasts, etc
-
-#### What are the project could-haves?
-
-
-
-#### Where do you expect traffic to come from?
-
-* links from blogs
-* links from pdf assets
-* visitors searching for continuous integration topics online
-
-#### Please provide any related media files
-
-
-
-#### Will you need an opengraph image for social sharing?
-
-Not sure
-
-#### If applicable, please provide some example webpages for design guidance.
-
-Examples:
-* Pinterest implements recommendations well
-* Stripe has good payment UX
-* I like the aesthetics of nike.com
-* Animation examples, microinteractions, etc
--->
-
-#### If applicable, do you have any user journeys, prototypes, content/data?
-
-
-
-
-#### Please create a checklist of deliverables in this phase
-
-- [ ] Copy complete - [Draft](https://docs.google.com/document/d/1LbUehBdSfaelENMsxW6PriuVrt0xpoAg9iGIobOQPEk/edit?usp=sharing)
-- [ ] First draft of page delivered
-- [ ] Page reviewed
-- [ ] Page live
-
-
-
-
-",1
-77186759,2021-01-13 20:57:37.458,Improve findability of different release information about GitLab,"Problem: We have too much information about releases in different places, and we might not have the SEO optimized. Example: I did a Google search for ""GitLab Releases"" and ended up on [this page](https://about.gitlab.com/releases/), which is a really poor customer experience.
-
-@timnoah and I compared what we saw when we did the same Google search, and had different results:
-
-My result:
-
-
-His result:
-",8
-77132027,2021-01-13 04:08:20.730,Marketing site Event list sorting incorrect in some cases when event date is a range,"This template is for filing a bug report related to the logged out marketing website https://about.gitlab.com/ and company handbook https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/
-
-This is not the correct repository for requests related to docs.gitlab.com, the GitLab product, or other items.
-
-#### What is/are the relevant URL(s)
-
-`https://about.gitlab.com/events/`
-
-#### Briefly describe the bug
-
-The Event list sorting does not always work correctly for events where the date is a date range.
-
-In development, you need to be running the marketing site (not the handbook) to view the `/events` page.
-
-#### If possible, please specify how to reproduce the bug
-
-In `events.yml` define an event with `date:` as a range.
-
-`date: December 30 - January 4, 2021`
-
-or
-
-`date: December 30 - January 4, 2022`
-
-or
-
-`date: December 30 - December 31, 1999`
-
-In all cases GitLab::Homepage::Event `sort_date` will parse `December 30` as `December 30, 2021` (the current year).
-
-
-
-
-/cc @gl-website
-
-",2
-77042786,2021-01-11 17:38:04.016,Privacy policy page is bugged,"This template is for filing a bug report related to the logged out marketing website https://about.gitlab.com/ and company handbook https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/
-
-This is not the correct repository for requests related to docs.gitlab.com, the GitLab product, or other items.
-
-#### What is/are the relevant URL(s)
-
-`https://about.gitlab.com/privacy/`
-
-#### Briefly describe the bug
-
-Example: A link is broken and when hovering over it the color is the wrong color and poorly aligned.
-
-`@sdaily reported. The page looks unstyled and has broken formatting.`
-
-#### If possible, please specify how to reproduce the bug
-
-`Visit the page`
-
-#### Please provide any relevant screenshots or screencasts
-
-How to take a screenshot: https://www.howtogeek.com/205375/how-to-take-screenshots-on-almost-any-device/
-
-
-
-#### What is your window size, browser, operating system, and versions
-
-Please use the following website to determine your browser specifications and provide a link developers can follow:
-
-What is my browser https://www.whatsmybrowser.org
-
-`https://www.whatsmybrowser.org/b/4YUV8SF`
-
-#### What computing device are you using?
-
-Please list the brand and model (Example: Samsung Galaxy S 10 Plus)
-
-`Macbook pro 15"" 2019`
-
-#### Have you tried a fresh incognito window? Could this be related to cookies or account type/state?
-
-- [x] I tried a fresh incognito window & it had no impact.
-- [ ] The problem goes away when using an incognito window.
-- [ ] The problem only happens when certain cookies are set to a specific value (please specify below).
-
-#### Please list any browser plugins you have enabled
-
-Why do we ask for this? Certain website bugs may be caused by plugins. For example: Adblock, noscript, ghostery, safe browsing.
-
-`N/A`
-
-#### What is your geographic location
-
-Why do we ask for this? Certain bugs may be geographically related. For example, if you're in the European Union, it could be related to GDPR policy and cookies.
-
-`California. Other locations have reported this as well.`
-
-#### What type of network are you connected to?
-
-**Type**
-
-- [x] Wired
-- [ ] Wifi
-- [ ] Cellular (4G, 5G, etc)
-- [ ] Satellite
-- [ ] Other
-
-`Insert details here if applicable`
-
-**Location**
-
-- [x] Home
-- [ ] Workplace
-- [ ] Travel facility (hotel, airport, conference center, etc)
-- [ ] Public venue (restaurant, library, cafe, etc)
-- [ ] VPN
-- [ ] Other
-
-`Insert details here if applicable`
-
-**Hardware**
-
-- [x] I am behind a network security appliance such as a firewall
-- [ ] I am using a pi-hole or other hardware-based traffic blocker
-- [ ] Other
-
-`Insert details here if applicable`
-
-",1
-76926079,2021-01-08 12:32:53.821,Blog post: How to balance iteration with stability in engineering (Aug 17),"
-
-### Proposal
-
-Based on discussion with ZJ re: https://gitlab.com/gitlab-com/www-gitlab-com/-/issues/10021.
-
-Transcript: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1mduHzWXoaXo09Q6R4-oU9QPjR4AZwOzN22Nb4I7v6Kc/edit?usp=sharing
-
-### Checklist
-
-- [ ] If you have a specific publish date in mind (please allow 3 weeks' lead time)
- - [ ] Include it in the issue title and apply the appropriate milestone (e.g. `Blogs October 2020`)
- - [ ] Give the issue a due date of a minimum of 2 working days prior
- - [ ] If your post is likely to be >2,000 words, give a due date of a minimum of 4 working days prior
-- [ ] If [time sensitive](https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/marketing/blog/#process-for-time-sensitive-posts)
- - [ ] Add ~""Blog: Priority"" label and supplied rationale in description
- - [ ] Mention `@rebecca` to give her a heads up ASAP
-- [ ] If wide-spread customer impacting or sensitive, mention `@nwoods` to give her a heads up ASAP, apply the ~""sensitive"" label, and check the [PR handbook](https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/marketing/corporate-marketing/#requests-for-announcements) in case you need to open an announcement request instead of a blog post issue
-- [ ] If the post is about one of GitLab's Technology Partners, including integration partners, mention `@arashidi`, apply the ~""Partner Marketing"" label, and see the [blog handbook for more on third-party posts](https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/marketing/blog/index.html#third-party-posts)
-- [ ] If the post is about one of GitLab's customers, mention `@FionaOKeeffe`, apply the ~""Customer Reference Program"" label, and see the [blog handbook for more on third-party posts](https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/marketing/blog/index.html#third-party-posts)
-- [ ] Indicate if supporting an event or campaign
-- [ ] Indicate if this post requires additional approval from internal or external parties before publishing (please provide details in a comment)",4
-76925999,2021-01-08 12:30:15.482,Blog post: Why you should be doing engineering demos,"
-
-### Proposal
-
-Resources:
-
-* https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitaly/-/blob/master/.gitlab/issue_templates/Demo.md
-* https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/engineering/development/demos.html
-* From interview with ZJ: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1TtqTcqXk27CQeGlPgn-nPGl127KiER8YVGyfV_QywDc/edit?usp=sharing
-
-Inspired by conversation from https://gitlab.com/gitlab-com/www-gitlab-com/-/issues/10021.
-
-### Checklist
-
-- [ ] If you have a specific publish date in mind (please allow 3 weeks' lead time)
- - [ ] Include it in the issue title and apply the appropriate milestone (e.g. `Blogs October 2020`)
- - [ ] Give the issue a due date of a minimum of 2 working days prior
- - [ ] If your post is likely to be >2,000 words, give a due date of a minimum of 4 working days prior
-- [ ] If [time sensitive](https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/marketing/blog/#process-for-time-sensitive-posts)
- - [ ] Add ~""Blog: Priority"" label and supplied rationale in description
- - [ ] Mention `@rebecca` to give her a heads up ASAP
-- [ ] If wide-spread customer impacting or sensitive, mention `@nwoods` to give her a heads up ASAP, apply the ~""sensitive"" label, and check the [PR handbook](https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/marketing/corporate-marketing/#requests-for-announcements) in case you need to open an announcement request instead of a blog post issue
-- [ ] If the post is about one of GitLab's Technology Partners, including integration partners, mention `@arashidi`, apply the ~""Partner Marketing"" label, and see the [blog handbook for more on third-party posts](https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/marketing/blog/index.html#third-party-posts)
-- [ ] If the post is about one of GitLab's customers, mention `@FionaOKeeffe`, apply the ~""Customer Reference Program"" label, and see the [blog handbook for more on third-party posts](https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/marketing/blog/index.html#third-party-posts)
-- [ ] Indicate if supporting an event or campaign
-- [ ] Indicate if this post requires additional approval from internal or external parties before publishing (please provide details in a comment)",2
-76949689,2021-01-04 19:43:35.458,ENG: Investigate upgrading to Ruby 3 for the www repo,https://www.ruby-lang.org/en/news/2020/12/25/ruby-3-0-0-released/,1
-76570477,2020-12-29 23:40:19.596,Update agile delivery topics/solutions pages,"The Agile Delivery Solutions page is linked under Agile Delivery on the topics page.
-
-In this [MR](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-com/www-gitlab-com/-/merge_requests/70991), we removed agile delivery from the monorepo, and it's showing as nested under the `topics` folder. But when you go to the [topics](https://about.gitlab.com/topics/) live page, it still links to about.gitlab.com/solutions/agile-delivery
-
-I'm not sure why it would still be linking to the solutions page after the changes we made.
-
-Thank you for taking another look at this!",1
-76538504,2020-12-28 23:35:25.302,"Create ""What is a continuous integration server"" web article","
-
-#### What problem(s) are we trying to solve? What are the project goals?
-
-This will be a web article describing how to implement continuous integration that will be linked from the [CI/CD topics page](https://about.gitlab.com/topics/ci-cd/)
-
-#### Briefly describe your request
-
-Create a web article nested within the CI/CD topics page
-
-#### What is/are the relevant URL(s)
-
-https://about.gitlab.com/topics/ci-cd/continuous-integration-server
-
-
-#### Please identify the directly responsible individual (DRI), stakeholders, and roles
-
-
-
-#### Does this request require a form to capture registrations for a gated asset?
-
-- [x] No
-- [ ] Yes
-
-
-
-#### What are the project should-haves?
-
-This page should have the look and layout of other topics pages and sections at the bottom for listing other resources: eBooks, blogs, whitepapers, webcasts, etc
-
-#### What are the project could-haves?
-
-
-
-#### Where do you expect traffic to come from?
-
-* links from blogs
-* links from pdf assets
-* visitors searching for continuous integration topics online
-
-#### Please provide any related media files
-
-
-
-#### Will you need an opengraph image for social sharing?
-
-Not sure
-
-#### If applicable, please provide some example webpages for design guidance.
-
-Examples:
-* Pinterest implements recommendations well
-* Stripe has good payment UX
-* I like the aesthetics of nike.com
-* Animation examples, microinteractions, etc
--->
-
-#### If applicable, do you have any user journeys, prototypes, content/data?
-
-
-
-
-#### Please create a checklist of deliverables in this phase
-
-- [ ] Copy complete - [Draft](https://docs.google.com/document/d/1LbUehBdSfaelENMsxW6PriuVrt0xpoAg9iGIobOQPEk/edit?usp=sharing)
-- [ ] First draft of page delivered
-- [ ] Page reviewed
-- [ ] Page live
-
-
-
-
-",1
-76535842,2020-12-28 20:37:17.610,Install and Setup Tailwind CSS on www.gitlab.com Repo for Production,"We need to setup Tailwind CSS into our www.gitlab.com repo. Since we have already tested this framework and we are satisfied that its' the best direction, its imperative that we should start using it to develop our marketing pages.
-
-I have started the installation on this branch. https://gitlab.com/gitlab-com/www-gitlab-com/-/tree/tailwind-integrate-middleman",4
-76532135,2020-12-28 17:43:40.854,"Create ""Continuous integration in Agile development"" web article","
-
-#### What problem(s) are we trying to solve? What are the project goals?
-
-This will be a web article describing how to implement continuous integration that will be linked from the [CI/CD topics page](https://about.gitlab.com/topics/ci-cd/)
-
-#### Briefly describe your request
-
-Create a web article nested within the CI/CD topics page
-
-#### What is/are the relevant URL(s)
-
-https://about.gitlab.com/topics/ci-cd/continuous-integration-agile
-
-
-#### Please identify the directly responsible individual (DRI), stakeholders, and roles
-
-
-
-#### Does this request require a form to capture registrations for a gated asset?
-
-- [x] No
-- [ ] Yes
-
-
-
-#### What are the project should-haves?
-
-This page should have the look and layout of other topics pages and sections at the bottom for listing other resources: eBooks, blogs, whitepapers, webcasts, etc
-
-#### What are the project could-haves?
-
-
-
-#### Where do you expect traffic to come from?
-
-* links from blogs
-* links from pdf assets
-* visitors searching for continuous integration topics online
-
-#### Please provide any related media files
-
-
-
-#### Will you need an opengraph image for social sharing?
-
-Not sure
-
-#### If applicable, please provide some example webpages for design guidance.
-
-Examples:
-* Pinterest implements recommendations well
-* Stripe has good payment UX
-* I like the aesthetics of nike.com
-* Animation examples, microinteractions, etc
--->
-
-#### If applicable, do you have any user journeys, prototypes, content/data?
-
-
-
-
-#### Please create a checklist of deliverables in this phase
-
-- [x] Copy complete - [Draft](https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Gw7pppdf9QBSaAZsw0lfEla7FmoWRS5892JELkE6TWM/edit?usp=sharing)
-- [ ] First draft of page delivered
-- [ ] Page reviewed
-- [ ] Page live
-
-
-
-
-",1
-76431900,2020-12-23 17:02:38.383,Edit CD Solution Overview blog - The basics of GitLab CD,"
-
-### Proposal
-
-Will edit and re-purpose this [unfiltered blog](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-com/www-gitlab-com/-/issues/10238)
-
-https://gitlab.com/gitlab-com/www-gitlab-com/-/issues/10238#note_473099796
-
-
-
-### Checklist
-
-- [ ] If you have a specific publish date in mind (please allow 3 weeks' lead time)
- - [ ] Include it in the issue title and apply the appropriate milestone (e.g. `Blogs October 2020`)
- - [ ] Give the issue a due date of a minimum of 2 working days prior
- - [ ] If your post is likely to be >2,000 words, give a due date of a minimum of 4 working days prior
-- [ ] If [time sensitive](https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/marketing/blog/#process-for-time-sensitive-posts)
- - [ ] Add ~""Blog: Priority"" label and supplied rationale in description
- - [ ] Mention `@rebecca` to give her a heads up ASAP
-- [ ] If wide-spread customer impacting or sensitive, mention `@nwoods` to give her a heads up ASAP, apply the ~""sensitive"" label, and check the [PR handbook](https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/marketing/corporate-marketing/#requests-for-announcements) in case you need to open an announcement request instead of a blog post issue
-- [ ] If the post is about one of GitLab's Technology Partners, including integration partners, mention `@arashidi`, apply the ~""Partner Marketing"" label, and see the [blog handbook for more on third-party posts](https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/marketing/blog/index.html#third-party-posts)
-- [ ] If the post is about one of GitLab's customers, mention `@FionaOKeeffe`, apply the ~""Customer Reference Program"" label, and see the [blog handbook for more on third-party posts](https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/marketing/blog/index.html#third-party-posts)
-- [ ] Indicate if supporting an event or campaign
-- [ ] Indicate if this post requires additional approval from internal or external parties before publishing (please provide details in a comment)",2
-76431457,2020-12-23 16:55:01.132,Create separate CI and CD tags for the GitLab blog,"With so much focus on Continuous Integration and Continuous Delivery as separate products, and with the creation of two separate topic pages, there is a greater need for separation of the two.
-
-Currently, we have one blog tag for CI/CD in the [blog handbook](https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/marketing/blog/#tags), but it looks like there are separate tags for CI and CD showing up [here](https://about.gitlab.com/blog/tags.html).
-
-Could we phase out the CI/CD blog tag and encourage using the CI and CD tags separately?
-
-
-Action Items:
-
-- [ ] Organize blogs under the existing CI/CD tag into either CI, CD, or both.
-- [ ] Update blog handbook to reflect two tags (CI and CD)",2
-76430485,2020-12-23 16:26:35.141,Blog posts incorrectly placed in releases blog,"This template is for filing a bug report related to the logged out marketing website https://about.gitlab.com/ and company handbook https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/
-
-This is not the correct repository for requests related to docs.gitlab.com, the GitLab product, or other items.
-
-#### What is/are the relevant URL(s)
-
-https://about.gitlab.com/releases/2019/09/11/how-to-avoid-broken-master-with-pipelines-for-merge-requests/
-
-#### Briefly describe the bug
-
-Some blog posts have been incorrectly placed in the releases blog repo.
-
-#### If possible, please specify how to reproduce the bug
-
-`Insert answer here`
-
-#### Please provide any relevant screenshots or screencasts
-
-How to take a screenshot: https://www.howtogeek.com/205375/how-to-take-screenshots-on-almost-any-device/
-
-`Insert screenshot here`
-
-#### What is your window size, browser, operating system, and versions
-
-Please use the following website to determine your browser specifications and provide a link developers can follow:
-
-What is my browser https://www.whatsmybrowser.org
-
-`Insert results URL here`
-
-#### What computing device are you using?
-
-Please list the brand and model (Example: Samsung Galaxy S 10 Plus)
-
-`Insert answer here`
-
-#### Have you tried a fresh incognito window? Could this be related to cookies or account type/state?
-
-- [ ] I tried a fresh incognito window & it had no impact.
-- [ ] The problem goes away when using an incognito window.
-- [ ] The problem only happens when certain cookies are set to a specific value (please specify below).
-
-#### Please list any browser plugins you have enabled
-
-Why do we ask for this? Certain website bugs may be caused by plugins. For example: Adblock, noscript, ghostery, safe browsing.
-
-`Insert answer here`
-
-#### What is your geographic location
-
-Why do we ask for this? Certain bugs may be geographically related. For example, if you're in the European Union, it could be related to GDPR policy and cookies.
-
-`Insert answer here`
-
-#### What type of network are you connected to?
-
-**Type**
-
-- [ ] Wired
-- [ ] Wifi
-- [ ] Cellular (4G, 5G, etc)
-- [ ] Satellite
-- [ ] Other
-
-`Insert details here if applicable`
-
-**Location**
-
-- [ ] Home
-- [ ] Workplace
-- [ ] Travel facility (hotel, airport, conference center, etc)
-- [ ] Public venue (restaurant, library, cafe, etc)
-- [ ] VPN
-- [ ] Other
-
-`Insert details here if applicable`
-
-**Hardware**
-
-- [ ] I am behind a network security appliance such as a firewall
-- [ ] I am using a pi-hole or other hardware-based traffic blocker
-- [ ] Other
-
-`Insert details here if applicable`
-
-
-/cc @gl-website
-
-",1
-76155186,2020-12-16 20:06:18.254,Typos in blog post titles,"#### What is/are the relevant URL(s)
-
-* https://about.gitlab.com/blog/2017/06/07/continous-integration-ticketmaster/
- * typo from `continous` to `continuous`
-* https://about.gitlab.com/blog/2020/01/29/comparable-awards/
- * typo from `comparable` to `comparably`
-
-#### Briefly describe the bug
-
-Example: A link is broken and when hovering over it the color is the wrong color and poorly aligned.
-
-`Certain blog post URLs have typos in them`
-
-#### Notes
-
-* [Related slack thread](https://gitlab.slack.com/archives/C2R1NED61/p1608069001225700).
-
-#### Deliverables
-
-* [ ] Update the URLs
-* [ ] Add redirects from old URL to new URL
-* [ ] MR reviewed by `@shanerice` and `@rebecca`
-
-",1
-75852420,2020-12-09 19:50:57.361,Blog Post: using GitLab SAST with Android - December 2020,"
-
-### Proposal
-
-
-
-This blog post highlights the value of using GitLab SAST on Mobile Applications. It highlights specifically Android.
-I created a video as well as an application that user can clone and follow through with.
-
-### Checklist
-
-- [x] If you have a specific publish date in mind (please allow 3 weeks' lead time)
- - [x] Include it in the issue title and apply the appropriate milestone (e.g. `Blogs October 2020`)
- - [x] Give the issue a due date of a minimum of 2 working days prior
- - [ ] If your post is likely to be >2,000 words, give a due date of a minimum of 4 working days prior
-- [ ] If [time sensitive](https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/marketing/blog/#process-for-time-sensitive-posts)
- - [ ] Add ~""Blog: Priority"" label and supplied rationale in description
- - [ ] Mention `@rebecca` to give her a heads up ASAP
-- [ ] If wide-spread customer impacting or sensitive, mention `@nwoods` to give her a heads up ASAP, apply the ~""sensitive"" label, and check the [PR handbook](https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/marketing/corporate-marketing/#requests-for-announcements) in case you need to open an announcement request instead of a blog post issue
-- [ ] If the post is about one of GitLab's Technology Partners, including integration partners, mention `@arashidi`, apply the ~""Partner Marketing"" label, and see the [blog handbook for more on third-party posts](https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/marketing/blog/index.html#third-party-posts)
-- [ ] If the post is about one of GitLab's customers, mention `@FionaOKeeffe`, apply the ~""Customer Reference Program"" label, and see the [blog handbook for more on third-party posts](https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/marketing/blog/index.html#third-party-posts)
-- [ ] Indicate if supporting an event or campaign
-- [ ] Indicate if this post requires additional approval from internal or external parties before publishing (please provide details in a comment)",1
-75750230,2020-12-08 08:26:29.231,"Fix Broken Link and Update ""Where we are Headed""","The `Mock Press Release` link at https://about.gitlab.com/direction/plan/time_tracking/#where-we-are-headed hits a 404 (and also talks about September 2020 being in the future)- I think it could use an update :)
-
-
-
-As a bit of an aside, I tried adding a comment here, in the hope somehow I could escalate/convert to an issue-
-https://gitlab.com/gitlab-com/www-gitlab-com/-/commit/779aac664fa6275e027c68754eecfbb68f1d8ff6#note_462135057 is there a clever way to do this that i'm missing?",1
-75376797,2020-11-30 17:13:52.154,Blog post: How we prevented security fixes leaking into our public repositories (Dec 2020 / Jan 2021),"### Proposal
-
-Publish an engineering blog post about how we resolved these issues:
-
-* https://gitlab.com/gitlab-com/gl-infra/delivery/-/issues/426
-* https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/38386
-* https://gitlab.com/gitlab-com/gl-infra/delivery/-/issues/914
-
-### Checklist
-
-- [x] If you have a specific publish date in mind (please allow 3 weeks' lead time)
- - [x] Include it in the issue title and apply the appropriate milestone (e.g. `Blogs October 2020`)
- - [ ] Give the issue a due date of a minimum of 2 working days prior
- - [-] If your post is likely to be >2,000 words, give a due date of a minimum of 4 working days prior
-- [-] If [time sensitive](https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/marketing/blog/#process-for-time-sensitive-posts)
- - [-] Add ~""Blog: Priority"" label and supplied rationale in description
- - [-] Mention `@rebecca` to give her a heads up ASAP
-- [-] If wide-spread customer impacting or sensitive, mention `@nwoods` to give her a heads up ASAP, apply the ~""sensitive"" label, and check the [PR handbook](https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/marketing/corporate-marketing/#requests-for-announcements) in case you need to open an announcement request instead of a blog post issue
-- [-] If the post is about one of GitLab's Technology Partners, including integration partners, mention `@arashidi`, apply the ~""Partner Marketing"" label, and see the [blog handbook for more on third-party posts](https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/marketing/blog/index.html#third-party-posts)
-- [-] If the post is about one of GitLab's customers, mention `@FionaOKeeffe`, apply the ~""Customer Reference Program"" label, and see the [blog handbook for more on third-party posts](https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/marketing/blog/index.html#third-party-posts)
-- [-] Indicate if supporting an event or campaign
-- [-] Indicate if this post requires additional approval from internal or external parties before publishing (please provide details in a comment)",1
-75372929,2020-11-30 16:06:14.219,Blog post: Partial clone (TBD),"
-
-### Proposal
-
-(See https://gitlab.com/gitlab-com/www-gitlab-com/-/issues/10021#note_456867365). Answering some Qs about partial clone.
-
-Previous post published on the topic: https://about.gitlab.com/blog/2020/03/13/partial-clone-for-massive-repositories/
-
-Other resources:
-
-- Transcript: https://docs.google.com/document/d/18udLM2RRnA5y48w2qnAaGB0zHotbG3Wnu-NQfb-lBBk/edit?usp=sharing
-- https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-development-kit/-/merge_requests/1421
-- https://gitlab.com/groups/gitlab-org/-/epics/773
-
-### Checklist
-
-- [x] If you have a specific publish date in mind (please allow 3 weeks' lead time)
- - [x] Include it in the issue title and apply the appropriate milestone (e.g. `Blogs October 2020`)
- - [x] Give the issue a due date of a minimum of 2 working days prior
- - [ ] If your post is likely to be >2,000 words, give a due date of a minimum of 4 working days prior
-- [ ] If [time sensitive](https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/marketing/blog/#process-for-time-sensitive-posts)
- - [ ] Add ~""Blog: Priority"" label and supplied rationale in description
- - [ ] Mention `@rebecca` to give her a heads up ASAP
-- [ ] If wide-spread customer impacting or sensitive, mention `@nwoods` to give her a heads up ASAP, apply the ~""sensitive"" label, and check the [PR handbook](https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/marketing/corporate-marketing/#requests-for-announcements) in case you need to open an announcement request instead of a blog post issue
-- [ ] If the post is about one of GitLab's Technology Partners, including integration partners, mention `@arashidi`, apply the ~""Partner Marketing"" label, and see the [blog handbook for more on third-party posts](https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/marketing/blog/index.html#third-party-posts)
-- [ ] If the post is about one of GitLab's customers, mention `@FionaOKeeffe`, apply the ~""Customer Reference Program"" label, and see the [blog handbook for more on third-party posts](https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/marketing/blog/index.html#third-party-posts)
-- [ ] Indicate if supporting an event or campaign
-- [ ] Indicate if this post requires additional approval from internal or external parties before publishing (please provide details in a comment)",3
-75027883,2020-11-26 10:31:16.136,News category missing from /blog,"This template is for filing a bug report related to the logged out marketing website https://about.gitlab.com/ and company handbook https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/
-
-This is not the correct repository for requests related to docs.gitlab.com, the GitLab product, or other items.
-
-#### What is/are the relevant URL(s)
-
-https://about.gitlab.com/blog/
-
-#### Briefly describe the bug
-
-https://gitlab.com/gitlab-com/www-gitlab-com/-/merge_requests/68857 was merged to address https://gitlab.com/gitlab-com/www-gitlab-com/-/issues/9985. Now the ""News"" category has disappeared from the blog homepage entirely and there is no way to view posts in this category:
-
-
-
-#### If possible, please specify how to reproduce the bug
-
-Visit https://about.gitlab.com/blog/
-
-#### Please provide any relevant screenshots or screencasts
-
-See above
-
-#### What is your window size, browser, operating system, and versions
-
-https://www.whatsmybrowser.org/b/91AC9
-
-#### What computing device are you using?
-
-MacBook Pro 2020
-
-#### Have you tried a fresh incognito window? Could this be related to cookies or account type/state?
-
-- [x] I tried a fresh incognito window & it had no impact.
-- [ ] The problem goes away when using an incognito window.
-- [ ] The problem only happens when certain cookies are set to a specific value (please specify below).
-
-#### Please list any browser plugins you have enabled
-
-N/A
-
-#### What is your geographic location
-
-EU
-
-#### What type of network are you connected to?
-
-**Type**
-
-- [ ] Wired
-- [x] Wifi
-- [ ] Cellular (4G, 5G, etc)
-- [ ] Satellite
-- [ ] Other
-
-`Insert details here if applicable`
-
-**Location**
-
-- [x] Home
-- [ ] Workplace
-- [ ] Travel facility (hotel, airport, conference center, etc)
-- [ ] Public venue (restaurant, library, cafe, etc)
-- [ ] VPN
-- [ ] Other
-
-`Insert details here if applicable`
-
-**Hardware**
-
-- [ ] I am behind a network security appliance such as a firewall
-- [ ] I am using a pi-hole or other hardware-based traffic blocker
-- [ ] Other
-
-`Insert details here if applicable`
-
-
-/cc @gl-website
-
-",2
-74985068,2020-11-25 16:37:31.232,"Error occurred while installing nokogiri (1.10.10), and Bundler cannot continue on MacOS Big Sur","Installing the repo for the first time and ran into an issue when running `bundle install`.
-
-Lets diagnose what changes need to be made to our gemfile to fix this.
-````
-An error occurred while installing nokogiri (1.10.10), and Bundler cannot continue.
-Make sure that `gem install nokogiri -v '1.10.10' --source 'https://rubygems.org/'` succeeds before bundling.
-
-In Gemfile:
- capybara-screenshot was resolved to 1.0.25, which depends on
- capybara was resolved to 3.31.0, which depends on
- xpath was resolved to 3.2.0, which depends on
- nokogiri
-````
-
-#### System Information
-- macOS Big Sur
-- Version 11.0.1
-- MacBook Pro 15 Inch 2018",5
-74939869,2020-11-24 22:36:18.024,"Create ""How to find the right continuous integration tool"" web article","
-
-#### What problem(s) are we trying to solve? What are the project goals?
-
-This will be a web article describing how to implement continuous integration that will be linked from the [CI/CD topics page](https://about.gitlab.com/topics/ci-cd/)
-
-#### Briefly describe your request
-
-Create a web article nested within the CI/CD topics page
-
-#### What is/are the relevant URL(s)
-
-https://about.gitlab.com/topics/ci-cd/choose-continuous-integration-tool
-
-This web article is repurposing an existing blog called **[How to find the right CI/CD solution](https://about.gitlab.com/blog/2019/07/15/finding-the-right-ci-cd/)**
-
-
-#### Please identify the directly responsible individual (DRI), stakeholders, and roles
-
-
-
-#### Does this request require a form to capture registrations for a gated asset?
-
-- [x] No
-- [ ] Yes
-
-
-
-#### What are the project should-haves?
-
-This page should have the look and layout of other topics pages and sections at the bottom for listing other resources: eBooks, blogs, whitepapers, webcasts, etc
-
-#### What are the project could-haves?
-
-
-
-#### Where do you expect traffic to come from?
-
-* links from blogs
-* links from pdf assets
-* visitors searching for continuous integration topics online
-
-#### Please provide any related media files
-
-
-
-#### Will you need an opengraph image for social sharing?
-
-Not sure
-
-#### If applicable, please provide some example webpages for design guidance.
-
-Examples:
-* Pinterest implements recommendations well
-* Stripe has good payment UX
-* I like the aesthetics of nike.com
-* Animation examples, microinteractions, etc
--->
-
-#### If applicable, do you have any user journeys, prototypes, content/data?
-
-
-
-
-#### Please create a checklist of deliverables in this phase
-
-- [x] Copy complete - [Draft](https://docs.google.com/document/d/1CpMvT2-gKlUVNvgk8R8QcUNI4So5Hq2usR-wxjoxyz4/edit?usp=sharing)
-- [x] First draft of page delivered
-- [ ] Page reviewed
-- [ ] Page live
-
-
-
-
-",1
-74937333,2020-11-24 21:25:58.866,Collections post: How our engineering team built things at GitLab (Jan 6),"
-
-### Proposal
-
-Some of our top-performing technical posts were about how our engineering team built certain features at GitLab or how our engineering team troubleshooted different problems on GitLab. This is our second collection post that has a round-up of the best technical content that fits this frame.
-
-### Checklist
-
-- [ ] If you have a specific publish date in mind (please allow 3 weeks' lead time)
- - [ ] Include it in the issue title and apply the appropriate milestone (e.g. `Blogs October 2020`)
- - [ ] Give the issue a due date of a minimum of 2 working days prior
- - [ ] If your post is likely to be >2,000 words, give a due date of a minimum of 4 working days prior
-- [ ] If [time sensitive](https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/marketing/blog/#process-for-time-sensitive-posts)
- - [ ] Add ~""Blog: Priority"" label and supplied rationale in description
- - [ ] Mention `@rebecca` to give her a heads up ASAP
-- [ ] If wide-spread customer impacting or sensitive, mention `@nwoods` to give her a heads up ASAP, apply the ~""sensitive"" label, and check the [PR handbook](https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/marketing/corporate-marketing/#requests-for-announcements) in case you need to open an announcement request instead of a blog post issue
-- [ ] If the post is about one of GitLab's Technology Partners, including integration partners, mention `@arashidi`, apply the ~""Partner Marketing"" label, and see the [blog handbook for more on third-party posts](https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/marketing/blog/index.html#third-party-posts)
-- [ ] If the post is about one of GitLab's customers, mention `@FionaOKeeffe`, apply the ~""Customer Reference Program"" label, and see the [blog handbook for more on third-party posts](https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/marketing/blog/index.html#third-party-posts)
-- [ ] Indicate if supporting an event or campaign
-- [ ] Indicate if this post requires additional approval from internal or external parties before publishing (please provide details in a comment)",1
-74774764,2020-11-21 07:32:56.308,Blog post: Learn more about Learn@GitLab - Jan 12,"
-
-### Proposal
-
-Learn@GitLab is this beautiful resource that hasn't been promoted very much, so I'd like to write a blog about it and provide some details on how people can use it and link to a few of the videos and/or demos featured on the page.
-
-[Draft doc](https://docs.google.com/document/d/1gPh4wBM848iVQGTuFcB49kJZLMwu5BzYUiAmFCrLTMU/edit?usp=sharing)
-
-[Link to epic](https://gitlab.com/groups/gitlab-com/marketing/-/epics/954)
-
-### Checklist
-
-- [x] If you have a specific publish date in mind (please allow 3 weeks' lead time)
- - [x] Include it in the issue title and apply the appropriate milestone (e.g. `Blogs October 2020`)
- - [x] Give the issue a due date of a minimum of 2 working days prior
- - [ ] If your post is likely to be >2,000 words, give a due date of a minimum of 4 working days prior
-- [ ] If [time sensitive](https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/marketing/blog/#process-for-time-sensitive-posts)
- - [ ] Add ~""Blog: Priority"" label and supplied rationale in description
- - [ ] Mention `@rebecca` to give her a heads up ASAP
-- [ ] If wide-spread customer impacting or sensitive, mention `@nwoods` to give her a heads up ASAP, apply the ~""sensitive"" label, and check the [PR handbook](https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/marketing/corporate-marketing/#requests-for-announcements) in case you need to open an announcement request instead of a blog post issue
-- [ ] If the post is about one of GitLab's Technology Partners, including integration partners, mention `@TinaS`, apply the ~""Partner Marketing"" label, and see the [blog handbook for more on third-party posts](https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/marketing/blog/index.html#third-party-posts)
-- [ ] If the post is about one of GitLab's customers, mention `@KimLock` and `@FionaOKeeffe`, apply the ~""Customer Reference Program"" label, and see the [blog handbook for more on third-party posts](https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/marketing/blog/index.html#third-party-posts)
-- [ ] Indicate if supporting an event or campaign
-- [ ] Indicate if this post requires additional approval from internal or external parties before publishing (please provide details in a comment)",1
-74765487,2020-11-20 20:26:36.436,Handbook update: Add DIB checklist,"
-
-#### Briefly describe the update
-
-Drafting updates to the handbook so we can ensure all blog posts meet the DIB checklist criteria. This is a draft of the DIB checklist.
-
-",1
-74748560,2020-11-20 15:00:56.238,Set up markdown formatter that formats files following the Handbook’s Markdown style guide,"### Proposal
-
-This is part of the effort to enforce a consistent markdown formatting style across Markdown pages in the Handbook. The goal is integrating a command line tool that formats markdown files following the [Handbook Markdown Style Guide](https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/markdown-guide/).
-
-There is an MR draft that implements the formatting tool. We plan to move these changes to a separate NPM repository to integrate the formatter in the Static Site Editor as well: https://gitlab.com/gitlab-com/www-gitlab-com/-/merge_requests/68569/",3
-74685435,2020-11-19 19:42:29.939,"Follow-up from ""Homepage Redesign MVC2""","The following discussions from !66787 should be addressed:
-
-- [ ] @brandon_lyon started a [discussion](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-com/www-gitlab-com/-/merge_requests/66787#note_451136114): (+2 comments)
-
- > Feedback from Slack this morning
- >
- > * White text link on white background under the customer case studies section.
- > * Video carousel on homepage is not inclusive/diverse, but this was a preexisting problem.
- > * Cookiebot might be blocking certain js on the homepage (icons on the devops tools comparison)
- > * ""Learn more about our feature maturity"" might not be linking to an appropriate spot.",1
-74351782,2020-11-13 22:09:37.398,Make workflow diagram clickable,"We made some progress on this but didn't merge the MR - https://gitlab.com/gitlab-com/www-gitlab-com/-/merge_requests/67804
-
-We can use https://www.image-map.net/ to create the image map, however, the image is displayed at around 70% of the page width and the image map areas do not scale down, so the hotspots don't overlap with their parts of the diagram.
-
-The HTML looks like this:
-
-```
-
-
![]()
-
-
-```
-
-
-**Notes**
-
-- When copy/pasting from image-map.net, you will have to remove the indentation and re-add it from the beginning of each line.
-- The source file for the diagram is in [Figma](https://www.figma.com/file/ZHll9R1ER7IlSkpZrIiff3/Product-Development-Flow?node-id=0%3A1).",2
-74343971,2020-11-13 19:49:15.622,How we do agile/sprints remotely - 2021-03-02,"
-
-### Proposal
-
-Part of our [engineering + remote work series/collection](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-com/marketing/growth-marketing/global-content/editorial/-/issues/57#note_444393598), how we do agile and sprints remotely. Will add any relevant videos to the issue in description/comments.
-
-### Questions for respondents
-
-* How does GitLab (the platform) enable teams to work more agilely? ([Here is a blog post we published on the topic](https://about.gitlab.com/blog/2018/03/05/gitlab-for-agile-software-development/), but I'd like to know your perspective as well)
-* How does your team specifically use sprints at GitLab?
-* Do you have experience working with Agile for software development while working in an office setting, at a previous company?
-* Do you feel that GitLab's structure as an all-remote async company makes it easier for programmers to work agilely? Why or why not?
-* Thinking specifically about Agile/sprints, what are some of the benefits of working in an office setting, with your colleagues next to you? What are some of the challenges?
-* Are there any major differences between conducting a sprint/Agile software development on an in-person team vs. an all-remote, asynchronous team?
-* What are some tools, strategies that are most useful for remote, Agile software development? Any links/resources I should include in this post?
-* What advice do you have for engineers that are adopting Agile for the first time, or are working remotely for the first time?
-* What else do I need to know but haven't asked?
-
-### Some relevant links:
-- https://about.gitlab.com/blog/2020/11/11/gitlab-for-agile-portfolio-planning-project-management/
-- https://about.gitlab.com/blog/2018/03/05/gitlab-for-agile-software-development/
-- ""[A Day in the Life of an Agilist](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5J0bonGoECs)""
-- Keynote from Virtual Commit: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t8BvRMalbkM&list=PLFGfElNsQthYQaTiUPQcu4O0O20WHZksz&index=10
-
-### Checklist
-
-- [x] If you have a specific publish date in mind (please allow 3 weeks' lead time)
- - [x] Include it in the issue title and apply the appropriate milestone (e.g. `Blogs October 2020`)
- - [x] Give the issue a due date of a minimum of 2 working days prior
- - [ ] If your post is likely to be >2,000 words, give a due date of a minimum of 4 working days prior
-- [ ] If [time sensitive](https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/marketing/blog/#process-for-time-sensitive-posts)
- - [ ] Add ~""Blog: Priority"" label and supplied rationale in description
- - [ ] Mention `@rebecca` to give her a heads up ASAP
-- [ ] If wide-spread customer impacting or sensitive, mention `@nwoods` to give her a heads up ASAP, apply the ~""sensitive"" label, and check the [PR handbook](https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/marketing/corporate-marketing/#requests-for-announcements) in case you need to open an announcement request instead of a blog post issue
-- [ ] If the post is about one of GitLab's Technology Partners, including integration partners, mention `@TinaS`, apply the ~""Partner Marketing"" label, and see the [blog handbook for more on third-party posts](https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/marketing/blog/index.html#third-party-posts)
-- [ ] If the post is about one of GitLab's customers, mention `@KimLock` and `@FionaOKeeffe`, apply the ~""Customer Reference Program"" label, and see the [blog handbook for more on third-party posts](https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/marketing/blog/index.html#third-party-posts)
-- [ ] Indicate if supporting an event or campaign
-- [ ] Indicate if this post requires additional approval from internal or external parties before publishing (please provide details in a comment)",2
-74222090,2020-11-11 20:01:15.081,Creating People Data Team Catalog,"Please select a template from the top left dropdown before continuing.
-
-This repository primarily relates to the logged out marketing website
-https://about.gitlab.com/
-and company handbook
-https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/
-This is not the correct repository for requests related to docs.gitlab.com, the GitLab product, or other items.
-
-If you do not select an appropriate template then your issue might get lost. For more information about our workflows, please reference the handbook for the marketing website
-https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/marketing/website/
-or reference your team documentation.
-
-### FAQ:
-
-Q: Which template should I use?
-
-A: Most people will use the ""-website-bug-report"" or ""-handbook-update"" issue templates. To request updates to existing pages or new content, please visit https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/marketing/growth-marketing/#requesting-support
-
-There are also templates for writing various kinds of blog posts including the unfiltered category. Please see the blog handbook for instructions before you open an issue: https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/marketing/blog/#publishing-process
-
-The rest of the templates are likely specific to team, role, or special occasion.
-
-Q: When will you get to this issue?
-
-A: Your issue will be refined and then prioritized relative to other issues. Marketing's website development team is currently an impacted resource.
-
-Q: How do I link to an issue template?
-
-A: https://gitlab.com/gitlab-com/www-gitlab-com/issues/new?issuable_template=name-of-template
-
-Q: How do I edit this FAQ? I have another question.
-
-A: Submit an issue
-https://gitlab.com/gitlab-com/www-gitlab-com/issues/new
-with FAQ in the title and assign it to @ brandon_lyon or another member of the website team
-https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/marketing/website/",3
-74172754,2020-11-10 23:32:16.815,Register Here button on KubeCon Landing Page,Relates to https://gitlab.com/gitlab-com/marketing/growth-marketing/growth/-/issues/595,1
-74172293,2020-11-10 23:05:23.874,Topic page sidebars phase 2,Relates to https://gitlab.com/gitlab-com/marketing/growth-marketing/growth/-/issues/640,1
-74117948,2020-11-10 00:51:02.652,Make lifecycle icon banner mobile friendly,"Let's make the lifecycle icon banner displayed on https://about.gitlab.com/upcoming-releases/ mobile friendly.
-
-This element was originally pulled from https://about.gitlab.com/devops-tools/.
-
-
-- Related https://gitlab.com/gitlab-com/www-gitlab-com/-/merge_requests/67340
-- Related https://gitlab.com/gitlab-com/www-gitlab-com/-/issues/8746/",3
-73930688,2020-11-05 17:51:42.817,"""Configure"" misspelled in DevOps Lifecycle image","### Problem
-
-The DevOps Lifecycle image that is displayed at https://about.gitlab.com/stages-devops-lifecycle/ shows ""CONFIGUR"" instead of ""CONFIGURE"". This image is frequently-used, so this is a relatively high-visibility misspelling.
-
-### Screenshot
-
-",1
-73877101,2020-11-04 19:03:55.836,"Feature ""How GitLab Pages uses the GitLab API to serve content"" on main blog","
-
-
-Feature How GitLab Pages uses the GitLab API to serve content
-https://about.gitlab.com/blog/2020/08/03/how-gitlab-pages-uses-the-gitlab-api-to-serve-content/
-CC @jaime",1
-73810467,2020-11-03 15:27:54.485,How to shift left with continuous integration web article,"
-
-#### What problem(s) are we trying to solve? What are the project goals?
-
-This will be a web article describing the benefits of continuous integration that will be linked from the [CI/CD topics page](https://about.gitlab.com/topics/ci-cd/)
-
-#### Briefly describe your request
-
-Create a web article nested within the CI/CD topics page
-
-#### What is/are the relevant URL(s)
-
-https://about.gitlab.com/topics/ci-cd/shift-left-devops
-
-
-
-
-#### Please identify the directly responsible individual (DRI), stakeholders, and roles
-
-
-
-#### Does this request require a form to capture registrations for a gated asset?
-
-- [x] No
-- [ ] Yes
-
-
-
-#### What are the project should-haves?
-
-This page should have the look and layout of other topics pages and sections at the bottom for listing other resources: eBooks, blogs, whitepapers, webcasts, etc
-
-#### What are the project could-haves?
-
-
-
-#### Where do you expect traffic to come from?
-
-* links from blogs
-* links from pdf assets
-* visitors searching for continuous integration topics online
-
-#### Please provide any related media files
-
-
-
-#### Will you need an opengraph image for social sharing?
-
-Not sure
-
-#### If applicable, please provide some example webpages for design guidance.
-
-Examples:
-* Pinterest implements recommendations well
-* Stripe has good payment UX
-* I like the aesthetics of nike.com
-* Animation examples, microinteractions, etc
--->
-
-#### If applicable, do you have any user journeys, prototypes, content/data?
-
-
-
-
-#### Please create a checklist of deliverables in this phase
-
-- [x] Copy complete - [Draft](https://docs.google.com/document/d/1q2YZpV0DzgattC84mg-zzplOk3lqqWzJ5u7SvzUJVFA/edit?usp=sharing)
-- [ ] First draft of page delivered
-- [ ] Page reviewed
-- [ ] Page live
-
-
-
-
-",1
-73755985,2020-11-02 19:17:50.994,Blog: How pre-filled variables will make running pipelines easier - Dec 1,"
-
-### Proposal
-
-https://gitlab.com/gitlab-com/marketing/growth-marketing/global-content/content-marketing/-/issues/241
-
-*We have this feature coming out in 13.6 that I thought was really interesting and had a lot of engagement from the community.*
-
-- [Generate Run Pipeline form with pre-filled variables from .gitlab-ci.yml](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/30101)
-
-What made this topic interesting was that it had a lot of engagement (over 100 likes and several dozen comments). I would like to talk about this feature and also give three real-world examples of how this feature will impact workflows. Who will get the most value out of this feature? Is it something that saves time? Does it help users in some kind of specific way, and what examples can we give?
-
-### Checklist
-
-- [x] If you have a specific publish date in mind (please allow 3 weeks' lead time)
- - [x] Include it in the issue title and apply the appropriate milestone (e.g. `Blogs October 2020`)
- - [ ] Give the issue a due date of a minimum of 2 working days prior
- - [ ] If your post is likely to be >2,000 words, give a due date of a minimum of 4 working days prior
-- [ ] If [time sensitive](https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/marketing/blog/#process-for-time-sensitive-posts)
- - [ ] Add ~""Blog: Priority"" label and supplied rationale in description
- - [ ] Mention `@rebecca` to give her a heads up ASAP
-- [ ] If wide-spread customer impacting or sensitive, mention `@nwoods` to give her a heads up ASAP, apply the ~""sensitive"" label, and check the [PR handbook](https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/marketing/corporate-marketing/#requests-for-announcements) in case you need to open an announcement request instead of a blog post issue
-- [ ] If the post is about one of GitLab's Technology Partners, including integration partners, mention `@TinaS`, apply the ~""Partner Marketing"" label, and see the [blog handbook for more on third-party posts](https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/marketing/blog/index.html#third-party-posts)
-- [ ] If the post is about one of GitLab's customers, mention `@KimLock` and `@FionaOKeeffe`, apply the ~""Customer Reference Program"" label, and see the [blog handbook for more on third-party posts](https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/marketing/blog/index.html#third-party-posts)
-- [ ] Indicate if supporting an event or campaign
-- [ ] Indicate if this post requires additional approval from internal or external parties before publishing (please provide details in a comment)",1
-73755565,2020-11-02 19:08:57.258,Blog: How we're making migrating to GitLab CI easier - Dec 8,"
-
-### Proposal
-
-https://gitlab.com/gitlab-com/marketing/growth-marketing/global-content/content-marketing/-/issues/232
-
-We have a ton of documentation around making the migration process from Jenkins easier - let's talk about that. Found this product direction [here](https://about.gitlab.com/direction/verify/jenkins_importer/) and think it could be worth talking about.
-
-We could make this specific to how we're improving the migration process from Jenkins and use it for the Jenkins competitive campaign relaunch. Would like to see your thoughts on this.
-
-* [Reddit thread](https://www.reddit.com/r/devops/comments/8bxbyw/why_do_you_want_to_migrate_from_jenkins/) asking why you want to migrate from Jenkins
-
-Could also really use your help on the title. Should I say migrating from Jeknins or migrating to GitLab CI and then mentioning Jenkins in the subtitle?
-
-### Checklist
-
-- [x] If you have a specific publish date in mind (please allow 3 weeks' lead time)
- - [x] Include it in the issue title and apply the appropriate milestone (e.g. `Blogs October 2020`)
- - [x] Give the issue a due date of a minimum of 2 working days prior
- - [ ] If your post is likely to be >2,000 words, give a due date of a minimum of 4 working days prior
-- [ ] If [time sensitive](https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/marketing/blog/#process-for-time-sensitive-posts)
- - [ ] Add ~""Blog: Priority"" label and supplied rationale in description
- - [ ] Mention `@rebecca` to give her a heads up ASAP
-- [ ] If wide-spread customer impacting or sensitive, mention `@nwoods` to give her a heads up ASAP, apply the ~""sensitive"" label, and check the [PR handbook](https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/marketing/corporate-marketing/#requests-for-announcements) in case you need to open an announcement request instead of a blog post issue
-- [ ] If the post is about one of GitLab's Technology Partners, including integration partners, mention `@TinaS`, apply the ~""Partner Marketing"" label, and see the [blog handbook for more on third-party posts](https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/marketing/blog/index.html#third-party-posts)
-- [ ] If the post is about one of GitLab's customers, mention `@KimLock` and `@FionaOKeeffe`, apply the ~""Customer Reference Program"" label, and see the [blog handbook for more on third-party posts](https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/marketing/blog/index.html#third-party-posts)
-- [x] Indicate if supporting an event or campaign - Jenkins campaign
-- [ ] Indicate if this post requires additional approval from internal or external parties before publishing (please provide details in a comment)",1
-73628489,2020-10-30 13:22:08.029,Collection: remote work + engineering - 2021-03-12,"
-
-### Proposal
-
-Post collecting new and existing remote work + engineering stories.
-
-To include new posts:
-
-- https://gitlab.com/gitlab-com/www-gitlab-com/-/issues/9899
-- https://gitlab.com/gitlab-com/www-gitlab-com/-/issues/9898
-- https://gitlab.com/gitlab-com/www-gitlab-com/-/issues/9809
-- https://gitlab.com/gitlab-com/www-gitlab-com/-/issues/9810
-
-Older posts to be considered:
-- https://about.gitlab.com/blog/2020/08/27/measuring-engineering-productivity-at-gitlab/
-- https://about.gitlab.com/blog/2019/06/03/how-we-turned-40-person-meeting-into-a-podcast/
-
-
-### Checklist
-
-- [ ] If you have a specific publish date in mind (please allow 3 weeks' lead time)
- - [x] Include it in the issue title and apply the appropriate milestone (e.g. `Blogs October 2020`)
- - [ ] Give the issue a due date of a minimum of 2 working days prior
- - [ ] If your post is likely to be >2,000 words, give a due date of a minimum of 4 working days prior
-- [ ] If [time sensitive](https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/marketing/blog/#process-for-time-sensitive-posts)
- - [ ] Add ~""Blog: Priority"" label and supplied rationale in description
- - [ ] Mention `@rebecca` to give her a heads up ASAP
-- [ ] If wide-spread customer impacting or sensitive, mention `@nwoods` to give her a heads up ASAP, apply the ~""sensitive"" label, and check the [PR handbook](https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/marketing/corporate-marketing/#requests-for-announcements) in case you need to open an announcement request instead of a blog post issue
-- [ ] If the post is about one of GitLab's Technology Partners, including integration partners, mention `@TinaS`, apply the ~""Partner Marketing"" label, and see the [blog handbook for more on third-party posts](https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/marketing/blog/index.html#third-party-posts)
-- [ ] If the post is about one of GitLab's customers, mention `@KimLock` and `@FionaOKeeffe`, apply the ~""Customer Reference Program"" label, and see the [blog handbook for more on third-party posts](https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/marketing/blog/index.html#third-party-posts)
-- [ ] Indicate if supporting an event or campaign
-- [ ] Indicate if this post requires additional approval from internal or external parties before publishing (please provide details in a comment)",2
-73572197,2020-10-29 11:40:51.161,Feature Unfiltered posts,"
-
-Unfiltered posts to consider for featuring:
-
-- https://about.gitlab.com/blog/2020/09/01/a-tale-of-two-editors/
- - This reminds me of [this post](https://about.gitlab.com/blog/2020/02/27/how-holistic-ux-design-increased-gitlab-free-trial-signups/) which got over 1,700 unique views in 2 months after publishing. Probably only needs a light edit.
-- https://about.gitlab.com/blog/2020/08/03/how-gitlab-pages-uses-the-gitlab-api-to-serve-content/
- - This seems like a classic technical post about a popular feature.
-
-These posts both got >200 unique views as Unfiltered posts.",1
-73541280,2020-10-28 20:31:22.988,CI blogs for repurpose,"I went through the spreadsheet of blogs [grouped by topic](https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/15RorS3Y7fRHWoIaNR-37Oq34F_xRyihAjXM_o-yXous/edit?usp=sharing) and selected some CI blogs that would be good candidates for repurposing into web articles.
-
-## [How to find the right CI/CD solution](https://about.gitlab.com/blog/2019/07/15/finding-the-right-ci-cd/)
-
-This can be some helpful content that isn't GitLab-focused, and provides some good action steps that would fit into the CI topic page.
-
-## [4 Benefits of CI/CD](https://about.gitlab.com/blog/2019/06/27/positive-outcomes-ci-cd/)
-
-I can roll the benefits section into the existing benefits of continuous integration, but there's a section in this blog about measuring CI success that would be good for its own web article
-
-## [Defending the CI/CD pipeline](https://about.gitlab.com/blog/2019/11/19/defend-cicd-security/)
-
-Tips for defending pipelines would work well for CI
-
-## [CI/CD: The ticket to multicloud](https://about.gitlab.com/blog/2020/01/17/ci-cd-the-ticket-to-multicloud/)
-
-I think his would be a good tie in for CI or it could be a good web article for the multicloud page on ""How to implement multicloud"" or ""the challenges of multicloud""",1
-73251589,2020-10-23 14:00:04.009,Collection post: How to do XYZ with GitLab (Dec 17),"
-
-### Proposal
-
-""Collection"" post highlighting our most popular engineering stories, including blog posts and potentially select videos from Commit sessions (https://gitlab.com/gitlab-com/marketing/growth-marketing/global-content/editorial/-/issues/43).
-
-Supporting https://gitlab.com/groups/gitlab-com/marketing/growth-marketing/-/epics/137.
-
-### Checklist
-
-- [x] If you have a specific publish date in mind (please allow 3 weeks' lead time)
- - [x] Include it in the issue title and apply the appropriate milestone (e.g. `Blogs October 2020`)
- - [x] Give the issue a due date of a minimum of 2 working days prior
- - [ ] If your post is likely to be >2,000 words, give a due date of a minimum of 4 working days prior
-- [ ] If [time sensitive](https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/marketing/blog/#process-for-time-sensitive-posts)
- - [ ] Add ~""Blog: Priority"" label and supplied rationale in description
- - [ ] Mention `@rebecca` to give her a heads up ASAP
-- [ ] If wide-spread customer impacting or sensitive, mention `@nwoods` to give her a heads up ASAP, apply the ~""sensitive"" label, and check the [PR handbook](https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/marketing/corporate-marketing/#requests-for-announcements) in case you need to open an announcement request instead of a blog post issue
-- [ ] If the post is about one of GitLab's Technology Partners, including integration partners, mention `@TinaS`, apply the ~""Partner Marketing"" label, and see the [blog handbook for more on third-party posts](https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/marketing/blog/index.html#third-party-posts)
-- [ ] If the post is about one of GitLab's customers, mention `@KimLock` and `@FionaOKeeffe`, apply the ~""Customer Reference Program"" label, and see the [blog handbook for more on third-party posts](https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/marketing/blog/index.html#third-party-posts)
-- [ ] Indicate if supporting an event or campaign
-- [ ] Indicate if this post requires additional approval from internal or external parties before publishing (please provide details in a comment)",2
-72968553,2020-10-19 15:34:48.574,Temporarily disable related blog posts,Relates to https://gitlab.com/gitlab-com/www-gitlab-com/-/merge_requests/65289#note_431800820,1
-72906228,2020-10-18 15:53:42.459,Correct graphics on DevSecOps image,"This template is for filing a bug report related to the logged out marketing website https://about.gitlab.com/ and company handbook https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/
-
-This is not the correct repository for requests related to docs.gitlab.com, the GitLab product, or other items.
-
-#### What is/are the relevant URL(s)
-
-The page is https://about.gitlab.com/solutions/dev-sec-ops.
-
-This page is a key asset in the DevSecOps campaign and in all security communications. Please correct it asap.
-
-
-#### Briefly describe the bug
-
-The graphics for DevSecOps were improperly modified changing the message incorrectly
-
-
-#### If possible, please specify how to reproduce the bug
-
-This is the graphic that is incorrect:
-
-
-#### Please provide any relevant screenshots or screencasts
-
-This arrow is pointing the wrong direction. It should point FROM the review app TO the actions. It is intended to create an iterative circle in which the developer works. The message is totally lost with the current image.
-
-
-
-While the image is being changed, please move the security dashboard over to the right to visually separate the security activity from the iterative developer activity.
-
-
-
-It should be in keeping with the original graphic here.
-
-
-#### What is your window size, browser, operating system, and versions
-
-Please use the following website to determine your browser specifications and provide a link developers can follow:
-
-What is my browser https://www.whatsmybrowser.org
-
-Chrome 86
-
-#### What computing device are you using?
-
-Please list the brand and model (Example: Samsung Galaxy S 10 Plus)
-
-Apple macbook
-
-#### Have you tried a fresh incognito window? Could this be related to cookies or account type/state?
-
-not applicable
-
-- [ ] I tried a fresh incognito window & it had no impact.
-- [ ] The problem goes away when using an incognito window.
-- [ ] The problem only happens when certain cookies are set to a specific value (please specify below).
-
-#### Please list any browser plugins you have enabled
-
-Why do we ask for this? Certain website bugs may be caused by plugins. For example: Adblock, noscript, ghostery, safe browsing.
-
-not applicable
-
-#### What is your geographic location
-
-Why do we ask for this? Certain bugs may be geographically related. For example, if you're in the European Union, it could be related to GDPR policy and cookies.
-
-USA
-
-#### What type of network are you connected to?
-
-**Type**
-
-- [ ] Wired
-- [x] Wifi
-- [ ] Cellular (4G, 5G, etc)
-- [ ] Satellite
-- [ ] Other
-
-`Insert details here if applicable`
-
-**Location**
-
-- [x] Home
-- [ ] Workplace
-- [ ] Travel facility (hotel, airport, conference center, etc)
-- [ ] Public venue (restaurant, library, cafe, etc)
-- [ ] VPN
-- [ ] Other
-
-`Insert details here if applicable`
-
-**Hardware**
-
-n/a
-
-- [ ] I am behind a network security appliance such as a firewall
-- [ ] I am using a pi-hole or other hardware-based traffic blocker
-- [ ] Other
-
-`Insert details here if applicable`
-
-
-/cc @gl-website
-
-",1
-72852159,2020-10-16 18:55:41.971,Remove lightning talk from Hashicorp page,Relates to https://gitlab.com/gitlab-com/marketing/growth-marketing/growth/-/issues/477,1
-72723683,2020-10-14 15:57:33.947,Blog post: How Kamil created the DevOps platform software category from Poland (Oct 29),"
-
-### Proposal
-
-Sid: I propose I write an article headlined: How Kamil created the DevOps platform software category from Poland. It will first talk about the Gartner validation including ""Our definition of VSDP does not describe a system that cobbles together disparate DevOps tools. Instead, we view VSDPs as integrated platforms that enhance productivity, collaboration, communication, and business outcomes for product teams via interactions between the platform
-components."" Then, how Kamil advocated for integrating GitLab SCM with CI in 2016.
-
-Helpful links:
-
-- [Gartner Market Guide for DevOps Value Stream Delivery Platforms](https://drive.google.com/file/d/1qHpdyCPDHgdfID56_io_-vwXHXjH7PH2/view?usp=sharing)
-- [Gartner Hype Cycle for Agile and DevOps, 2020 (pages 13-15)](https://drive.google.com/file/d/1gRIZc82ShZAw_3W8mC1QSLb7hIh-I8jr/view?usp=sharing)
-- [Handbook: Developing a new category](https://about.gitlab.com/analysts/#thought-leadership-analysts)
-- [Gartner Market Guide Methodology](https://www.gartner.com/en/research/methodologies/market-guide)
-- [HBR: Why it pays to be a category creator](https://hbr.org/2013/03/why-it-pays-to-be-a-category-creator)
-
-### Checklist
-
-- [ ] If you have a specific publish date in mind (please allow 3 weeks' lead time)
- - [ ] Include it in the issue title
- - [ ] Give the issue a due date of a minimum of 2 working days prior
- - [ ] If your post is likely to be >2,000 words, give a due date of a minimum of 4 working days prior
-- [ ] If [time sensitive](https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/marketing/blog/#process-for-time-sensitive-posts)
- - [ ] Add ~""Blog: Priority"" label and supplied rationale in description
- - [ ] Mention `@rebecca` to give her a heads up ASAP
-- [ ] If wide-spread customer impacting or sensitive, mention `@nwoods` to give her a heads up ASAP, apply the ~""sensitive"" label, and check the [PR handbook](https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/marketing/corporate-marketing/#requests-for-announcements) in case you need to open an announcement request instead of a blog post issue
-- [ ] If the post is about one of GitLab's Technology Partners, including integration partners, mention `@TinaS`, apply the ~""Partner Marketing"" label, and see the [blog handbook for more on third-party posts](https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/marketing/blog/index.html#third-party-posts)
-- [ ] If the post is about one of GitLab's customers, mention `@KimLock` and `@FionaOKeeffe`, apply the ~""Customer Reference Program"" label, and see the [blog handbook for more on third-party posts](https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/marketing/blog/index.html#third-party-posts)
-- [ ] Indicate if supporting an event or campaign
-- [ ] Indicate if this post requires additional approval from internal or external parties before publishing (please provide details in a comment)",5
-72605067,2020-10-12 23:20:11.776,Continuous integration best practices web article,"
-
-#### What problem(s) are we trying to solve? What are the project goals?
-
-This will be a web article describing continuous integration best practices that will be linked from the [CI/CD topics page](https://about.gitlab.com/topics/ci-cd/)
-
-#### Briefly describe your request
-
-Create a web article nested within the CI/CD topics page
-
-#### What is/are the relevant URL(s)
-
-https://about.gitlab.com/topics/ci-cd/continuous-integration-best-practices
-
-
-
-
-#### Please identify the directly responsible individual (DRI), stakeholders, and roles
-
-
-
-#### Does this request require a form to capture registrations for a gated asset?
-
-- [x] No
-- [ ] Yes
-
-
-
-#### What are the project should-haves?
-
-This page should have the look and layout of other topics pages and sections at the bottom for listing other resources: eBooks, blogs, whitepapers, webcasts, etc
-
-#### What are the project could-haves?
-
-
-
-#### Where do you expect traffic to come from?
-
-* links from blogs
-* links from pdf assets
-* visitors searching for continuous integration topics online
-
-#### Please provide any related media files
-
-
-
-#### Will you need an opengraph image for social sharing?
-
-Not sure
-
-#### If applicable, please provide some example webpages for design guidance.
-
-Examples:
-* Pinterest implements recommendations well
-* Stripe has good payment UX
-* I like the aesthetics of nike.com
-* Animation examples, microinteractions, etc
--->
-
-#### If applicable, do you have any user journeys, prototypes, content/data?
-
-
-
-
-#### Please create a checklist of deliverables in this phase
-
-- [x] Copy complete - [Draft](https://docs.google.com/document/d/1vy7N3gWUhd7lcDMG-rEePiF1ImNrELRG1xpxjgiGyis/edit?usp=sharing)
-- [ ] First draft of page delivered
-- [ ] Page reviewed
-- [ ] Page live
-
-
-
-
-",2
-72599496,2020-10-12 19:13:13.205,What is pipeline as code article,"
-
-#### What problem(s) are we trying to solve? What are the project goals?
-
-This will be a web article describing pipeline as code that will be linked from the [CI/CD topics page](https://about.gitlab.com/topics/ci-cd/)
-
-#### Briefly describe your request
-
-Create a web article nested within the CI/CD topics page
-
-#### What is/are the relevant URL(s)
-
-https://about.gitlab.com/topics/ci-cd/pipeline-as-code
-
-
-
-
-#### Please identify the directly responsible individual (DRI), stakeholders, and roles
-
-
-
-#### Does this request require a form to capture registrations for a gated asset?
-
-- [x] No
-- [ ] Yes
-
-
-
-#### What are the project should-haves?
-
-This page should have the look and layout of other topics pages and sections at the bottom for listing other resources: eBooks, blogs, whitepapers, webcasts, etc
-
-#### What are the project could-haves?
-
-
-
-#### Where do you expect traffic to come from?
-
-* links from blogs
-* links from pdf assets
-* visitors searching for continuous integration topics online
-
-#### Please provide any related media files
-
-
-
-#### Will you need an opengraph image for social sharing?
-
-Not sure
-
-#### If applicable, please provide some example webpages for design guidance.
-
-Examples:
-* Pinterest implements recommendations well
-* Stripe has good payment UX
-* I like the aesthetics of nike.com
-* Animation examples, microinteractions, etc
--->
-
-#### If applicable, do you have any user journeys, prototypes, content/data?
-
-
-
-
-#### Please create a checklist of deliverables in this phase
-
-- [x] Copy complete - [Draft](https://docs.google.com/document/d/19R8JPLfo5dpIlSHpFdIpeQTI_sJMkzN4TS2t5sJNsk0/edit?usp=sharing)
-- [ ] First draft of page delivered
-- [ ] Page reviewed
-- [ ] Page live
-
-
-
-
-",2
-72416629,2020-10-08 20:56:24.289,How a continuous integration pipeline works web article,"
-
-#### What problem(s) are we trying to solve? What are the project goals?
-
-This will be a web article describing the benefits of continuous integration that will be linked from the [CI/CD topics page](https://about.gitlab.com/topics/ci-cd/)
-
-#### Briefly describe your request
-
-Create a web article nested within the CI/CD topics page
-
-#### What is/are the relevant URL(s)
-
-https://about.gitlab.com/topics/ci-cd/continuous-integration-pipeline
-
-
-
-
-#### Please identify the directly responsible individual (DRI), stakeholders, and roles
-
-
-
-#### Does this request require a form to capture registrations for a gated asset?
-
-- [x] No
-- [ ] Yes
-
-
-
-#### What are the project should-haves?
-
-This page should have the look and layout of other topics pages and sections at the bottom for listing other resources: eBooks, blogs, whitepapers, webcasts, etc
-
-#### What are the project could-haves?
-
-
-
-#### Where do you expect traffic to come from?
-
-* links from blogs
-* links from pdf assets
-* visitors searching for continuous integration topics online
-
-#### Please provide any related media files
-
-
-
-#### Will you need an opengraph image for social sharing?
-
-Not sure
-
-#### If applicable, please provide some example webpages for design guidance.
-
-Examples:
-* Pinterest implements recommendations well
-* Stripe has good payment UX
-* I like the aesthetics of nike.com
-* Animation examples, microinteractions, etc
--->
-
-#### If applicable, do you have any user journeys, prototypes, content/data?
-
-
-
-
-#### Please create a checklist of deliverables in this phase
-
-- [x] Copy complete - [Draft](https://docs.google.com/document/d/1-fnVAf0fZIl2O3vr6fSkSTeyz7iX6-FD7S3dsPtQErI/edit?usp=sharing)
-- [ ] First draft of page delivered
-- [ ] Page reviewed
-- [ ] Page live
-
-
-
-
-",2
-72408841,2020-10-08 17:51:35.476,The benefits of continuous integration web article,"
-
-#### What problem(s) are we trying to solve? What are the project goals?
-
-This will be a web article describing the benefits of continuous integration that will be linked from the [CI/CD topics page](https://about.gitlab.com/topics/ci-cd/)
-
-#### Briefly describe your request
-
-Create a web article nested within the CI/CD topics page
-
-#### What is/are the relevant URL(s)
-
-https://about.gitlab.com/topics/ci-cd/benefits-continuous-integration
-
-
-
-
-#### Please identify the directly responsible individual (DRI), stakeholders, and roles
-
-
-
-#### Does this request require a form to capture registrations for a gated asset?
-
-- [x] No
-- [ ] Yes
-
-
-
-#### What are the project should-haves?
-
-This page should have the look and layout of other topics pages and sections at the bottom for listing other resources: eBooks, blogs, whitepapers, webcasts, etc
-
-#### What are the project could-haves?
-
-
-
-#### Where do you expect traffic to come from?
-
-* links from blogs
-* links from pdf assets
-* visitors searching for continuous integration topics online
-
-#### Please provide any related media files
-
-
-
-#### Will you need an opengraph image for social sharing?
-
-Not sure
-
-#### If applicable, please provide some example webpages for design guidance.
-
-Examples:
-* Pinterest implements recommendations well
-* Stripe has good payment UX
-* I like the aesthetics of nike.com
-* Animation examples, microinteractions, etc
--->
-
-#### If applicable, do you have any user journeys, prototypes, content/data?
-
-
-
-
-#### Please create a checklist of deliverables in this phase
-
-- [x] Copy complete - [Draft](https://docs.google.com/document/d/1etfMVnLvzLbjGpv2pnh3sH1URxaB9aXJt3WLaoz_ABo/edit?usp=sharing)
-- [x] First draft of page delivered
-- [ ] Page reviewed
-- [ ] Page live
-
-
-
-
-",2
-72088168,2020-10-02 16:13:37.297,Refactor and add tests for `generators/releases.rb`,"- Refactor code
-- Add tests
-
-The following discussion from !64079 should be addressed:
-
-- [ ] @sean_carroll started a [discussion](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-com/www-gitlab-com/-/merge_requests/64079#note_422673457): (+1 comment)
-
- > Hi @nfriend thanks for this change!
- >
- > In reviewing the code, I was surprised to see that there are no tests for the existing code, before the changes on this MR. It is moderately complex code, and it is also quite visible being on our main website.
- >
- > I think we should take this opportunity to add a spec for `generators/release`, we can use https://gitlab.com/gitlab-com/www-gitlab-com/-/blob/master/spec/generators/org_chart_spec.rb as a model.
- >
- > I'm happy to help with this if useful.
- >
- > Back to you :ping_pong:",1
-72040399,2020-10-01 20:56:53.529,Commit - on demand links switched to youtube playlist,"Relates to https://gitlab.com/gitlab-com/marketing/growth-marketing/growth/-/issues/439
-
-## Deliverables
-
-- [x] Switch ""view on demand"" button URLS from `https://gitlabcommitvirtual.com/` to `https://www.youtube.com/c/Gitlab/playlists?view=50&sort=dd&shelf_id=5`
-- [x] Swap the video recap section with a video slider of the above playlist.
-- [x] Replace the Sched embed with a PDF.
-- [x] Temporarily add then remove the manual_cookiebot frontmatter.",2
-71815106,2020-09-28 16:24:39.108,Bug fix: # in blog frontmatter tweet field truncates the click to tweet,"This template is for filing a bug report related to the logged out marketing website https://about.gitlab.com/ and company handbook https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/
-
-This is not the correct repository for requests related to docs.gitlab.com, the GitLab product, or other items.
-
-#### What is/are the relevant URL(s)
-about.gitlab.com/blog
-
-#### Briefly describe the bug
-
-If a # is used in the blog's tweet line in the front matter the click-to-tweet feature is truncated right before the hashtag.
-
-#### If possible, please specify how to reproduce the bug
-
-Just insert a # in the ""tweet"" line in the blog front matter.
-
-
-
-/cc @gl-website
-
-",2
-71762671,2020-09-27 19:21:41.152,Dead link [bind us as a company] in jobs/faq,"#### What is/are the relevant URL(s)
-
-[https://about.gitlab.com/jobs/faq/#gitlabs-outbound-recruiting-model](https://about.gitlab.com/jobs/faq/#gitlabs-outbound-recruiting-model)
-
-[https://about.gitlab.com/jobs/faq/handbook/leadership/biggest-risks/#loss-of-the-values-that-bind-us](https://about.gitlab.com/jobs/faq/handbook/leadership/biggest-risks/#loss-of-the-values-that-bind-us)
-
-#### Briefly describe the bug
-
-The link `bind us as a company` in **GitLab’s outbound recruiting model** section is broken and produces a 404 error.
-
-#### If possible, please specify how to reproduce the bug
-
-Click on the link `bind us as a company` on the page ""Jobs at GitLab - FAQ"", section **GitLab’s outbound recruiting model**
-
-#### What is your window size, browser, operating system, and versions
-
-`https://www.whatsmybrowser.org/b/QZ3DM`
-
-#### What computing device are you using?
-
-Custom build PC.
-
-#### Have you tried a fresh incognito window? Could this be related to cookies or account type/state?
-
-- [x] I tried a fresh incognito window & it had no impact.
-- [ ] The problem goes away when using an incognito window.
-- [ ] The problem only happens when certain cookies are set to a specific value (please specify below).
-
-#### Please list any browser plugins you have enabled
-
-Why do we ask for this? Certain website bugs may be caused by plugins. For example: Adblock, noscript, ghostery, safe browsing.
-
-- Adblock Plus
-- DuckDuckGo Privacy Essentials
-- Facebook Container
-
-#### What is your geographic location
-
-Europe / France
-
-#### What type of network are you connected to?
-
-**Type**
-
-- [x] Wired
-- [ ] Wifi
-- [ ] Cellular (4G, 5G, etc)
-- [ ] Satellite
-- [ ] Other
-
-**Location**
-
-- [x] Home
-- [ ] Workplace
-- [ ] Travel facility (hotel, airport, conference center, etc)
-- [ ] Public venue (restaurant, library, cafe, etc)
-- [ ] VPN
-- [ ] Other
-
-**Hardware**
-
-- [ ] I am behind a network security appliance such as a firewall
-- [ ] I am using a pi-hole or other hardware-based traffic blocker
-- [ ] Other
-
-
-/cc @gl-website
-
-",1
-71699493,2020-09-25 17:08:38.652,Links to blog posts from review app wrong for file names with uppercase letters,"Blog post urls are automatically downcased during the build. This is good because mixed case URLs are bad for SEO.
-
-However, when a review app links directly to blog post with a mixed case file name, it returns a error. This is because the review app link doesn't change the URL link to all downcase.
-
-For example, a blog post file name of `2020-09-30-Q3-hackathon-recap.html.md.erb` will directly link to this URL from the review app this https://hackathon-recap.about.gitlab-review.app/blog/2020/09/30/Q3-hackathon-recap/index.html.
-
-That will return an ""no file found"" xml error because the of the mixed casing. The correct and reachable URL is https://hackathon-recap.about.gitlab-review.app/blog/2020/09/30/q3-hackathon-recap/index.html
-
-The related MR to the blog post is [here](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-com/www-gitlab-com/-/merge_requests/63488). I have also encountered this issue with other MRs too.
-
-Can we get the review app to link to the correct blog post?",2
-71583334,2020-09-23 17:46:09.496,Update scss lint rules,"Per slack,
-
-@laurenbarker could we look into disabling the following scss lint rules?
-
-* `no-qualifying-elements`
-* ~~`class-name-format`~~",1
-71295373,2020-09-17 08:44:02.685,Define outcomes and activities for Validation phase 2: Problem validation,"Associated MR: https://gitlab.com/gitlab-com/www-gitlab-com/-/merge_requests/63272
-
-**Problems to solve:**
-
-- [x] Doesn’t Encourage Cross-Functional Collaboration
-- [x] Too Many Steps
-- [x] Too Prescriptive
-
-Detailed problems to solve for reference: https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1BxUVcoPyjYkR7MOHn1aZGllMCqlH5eb27JKM_bb_uDA/edit#slide=id.g94724597ab_3_0
-
-**Requirements:** (can fall into multiple MRs)
-
-- [x] Do not remove or change workflow labels
-- [x] Maintain or add clarity on what is REQUIRED per https://gitlab.com/gitlab-com/www-gitlab-com/-/issues/9090
-- [x] Maintain or add clarity on who the cross-functional collaborators in the phase are
-- [x] Consider referencing the current step by step as a sample flow
-- [x] Incorporate link outs to handbook resources that support activities to achieve outcomes
-
-Potential template to leverage: https://gitlab.com/gitlab-com/www-gitlab-com/-/merge_requests/61793",3
-71295344,2020-09-17 08:43:00.350,Define outcomes and activities for Validation phase 1: Validation backlog,"**Problems to solve:**
-
-- [ ] Doesn’t Encourage Cross-Functional Collaboration
-- [ ] Too Many Steps
-- [ ] Too Prescriptive
-
-Detailed problems to solve for reference: https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1BxUVcoPyjYkR7MOHn1aZGllMCqlH5eb27JKM_bb_uDA/edit#slide=id.g94724597ab_3_0
-
-**Requirements:** (can fall into multiple MRs)
-
-- [ ] Do not remove or change workflow labels
-- [ ] Maintain or add clarity on what is REQUIRED per https://gitlab.com/gitlab-com/www-gitlab-com/-/issues/9090
-- [ ] Maintain or add clarity on who the cross-functional collaborators in the phase are
-- [ ] Consider referencing the current step by step as a sample flow
-- [ ] Incorporate link outs to handbook resources that support activities to achieve outcomes
-
-Potential template to leverage: https://gitlab.com/gitlab-com/www-gitlab-com/-/merge_requests/61793",3
-70595501,2020-09-01 19:00:18.425,Update trademark module look & feel to be less prominent,"Currently the trademark module on this page (https://about.gitlab.com/devops-tools/) is too prominent. See screenshot below:
-
-
-
-Please update page design to de-emphasize this section, per Becky's comment on design item #10 here: https://gitlab.com/gitlab-com/www-gitlab-com/-/issues/8468/designs/screencapture-about-gitlab-devops-tools-2020-07-27-14_04_35.png#note_405511055",1
-70278086,2020-08-25 16:08:25.988,Review metrics triggers on pricing,"Relates to https://gitlab.com/gitlab-com/www-gitlab-com/-/issues/8842
-
-Some of the metrics triggers we setup in LaunchDarkly aren't collecting data and need to be updated to more specific classnames/IDs.
-
-`Click start {{plan}}`
-
-cc @shanerice",1
-70235358,2020-08-24 19:42:05.640,All-Remote Lightbox shows Yes box instead of Checkbox,"This template is for filing a bug report related to the logged out marketing website https://about.gitlab.com/ and company handbook https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/
-
-This is not the correct repository for requests related to docs.gitlab.com, the GitLab product, or other items.
-
-#### What is/are the relevant URL(s)
-
-`https://about.gitlab.com/company/culture/all-remote/`
-
-#### Briefly describe the bug
-
-Example: A link is broken and when hovering over it the color is the wrong color and poorly aligned.
-
-`The `yes` box towards the bottom of the form should be a checkbox. I have made the necessary changes in Marketo, but can't get this field to update. See https://gitlab.com/gitlab-com/www-gitlab-com/-/issues/8355#note_399665866`
-
-Made changes to the Marketo form `Form 2430` https://app-ab13.marketo.com/#FO2430A1ZN13LA1
-
-#### If possible, please specify how to reproduce the bug
-
-Go to https://about.gitlab.com/company/culture/all-remote/ and click `Download the Remote PLaybook Now`
-
-#### Please provide any relevant screenshots or screencasts
-
-
-
-#### What is your window size, browser, operating system, and versions
-
-Please use the following website to determine your browser specifications and provide a link developers can follow:
-
-What is my browser https://www.whatsmybrowser.org
-
-`https://www.whatsmybrowser.org/b/68HGR`
-
-#### What computing device are you using?
-
-Please list the brand and model (Example: Samsung Galaxy S 10 Plus)
-
-`Insert answer here`
-
-#### Have you tried a fresh incognito window? Could this be related to cookies or account type/state?
-
-- [x] I tried a fresh incognito window & it had no impact.
-- [ ] The problem goes away when using an incognito window.
-- [ ] The problem only happens when certain cookies are set to a specific value (please specify below).
-
-#### Please list any browser plugins you have enabled
-
-Why do we ask for this? Certain website bugs may be caused by plugins. For example: Adblock, noscript, ghostery, safe browsing.
-
-`Ublock`
-
-#### What is your geographic location
-
-Why do we ask for this? Certain bugs may be geographically related. For example, if you're in the European Union, it could be related to GDPR policy and cookies.
-
-`Grover Beach, CA`
-
-#### What type of network are you connected to?
-
-**Type**
-
-- [ ] Wired
-- [x] Wifi
-- [ ] Cellular (4G, 5G, etc)
-- [ ] Satellite
-- [ ] Other
-
-`Insert details here if applicable`
-
-**Location**
-
-- [x] Home
-- [ ] Workplace
-- [ ] Travel facility (hotel, airport, conference center, etc)
-- [ ] Public venue (restaurant, library, cafe, etc)
-- [ ] VPN
-- [ ] Other
-
-`Insert details here if applicable`
-
-**Hardware**
-
-- [ ] I am behind a network security appliance such as a firewall
-- [ ] I am using a pi-hole or other hardware-based traffic blocker
-- [ ] Other
-
-`Insert details here if applicable`
-
-
-/cc @gl-website
-
-",1
-70232082,2020-08-24 17:49:38.536,Bug with mobile menu on events template,"This template is for filing a bug report related to the logged out marketing website https://about.gitlab.com/ and company handbook https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/
-
-This is not the correct repository for requests related to docs.gitlab.com, the GitLab product, or other items.
-
-#### What is/are the relevant URL(s)
-
-`https://about.gitlab.com/events/commit/`
-
-#### Briefly describe the bug
-
-Example: A link is broken and when hovering over it the color is the wrong color and poorly aligned.
-
-`The mobile menu on the event page feels broken since the menu doesn’t collapse upon selecting a link.`
-
-#### If possible, please specify how to reproduce the bug
-
-`On a mobile device (small display), open the hamburger menu and click on a link.`
-
-#### Please provide any relevant screenshots or screencasts
-
-How to take a screenshot: https://www.howtogeek.com/205375/how-to-take-screenshots-on-almost-any-device/
-
-
-
-#### What is your window size, browser, operating system, and versions
-
-Please use the following website to determine your browser specifications and provide a link developers can follow:
-
-What is my browser https://www.whatsmybrowser.org
-
-`https://www.whatsmybrowser.org/b/QV0IN`
-
-#### What computing device are you using?
-
-Please list the brand and model (Example: Samsung Galaxy S 10 Plus)
-
-`Mobile phone`
-
-#### Have you tried a fresh incognito window? Could this be related to cookies or account type/state?
-
-- [x] I tried a fresh incognito window & it had no impact.
-- [ ] The problem goes away when using an incognito window.
-- [ ] The problem only happens when certain cookies are set to a specific value (please specify below).
-
-#### Please list any browser plugins you have enabled
-
-Why do we ask for this? Certain website bugs may be caused by plugins. For example: Adblock, noscript, ghostery, safe browsing.
-
-`N/A`
-
-#### What is your geographic location
-
-Why do we ask for this? Certain bugs may be geographically related. For example, if you're in the European Union, it could be related to GDPR policy and cookies.
-
-`N/A`
-
-#### What type of network are you connected to?
-
-**Type**
-
-- [ ] Wired
-- [ ] Wifi
-- [x] Cellular (4G, 5G, etc)
-- [ ] Satellite
-- [ ] Other
-
-`Insert details here if applicable`
-
-**Location**
-
-- [x] Home
-- [ ] Workplace
-- [ ] Travel facility (hotel, airport, conference center, etc)
-- [ ] Public venue (restaurant, library, cafe, etc)
-- [ ] VPN
-- [ ] Other
-
-`Insert details here if applicable`
-
-**Hardware**
-
-- [ ] I am behind a network security appliance such as a firewall
-- [ ] I am using a pi-hole or other hardware-based traffic blocker
-- [ ] Other
-
-`Insert details here if applicable`
-
-",1
-70224476,2020-08-24 14:38:59.800,Add info to handbook about creating new DevOps comparison templates,Per Becky's note here: https://gitlab.com/groups/gitlab-com/marketing/growth-marketing/-/epics/13#note_399701003,1
-70131690,2020-08-21 21:47:02.068,DevSecOps survey - CI insights – 2020-10-22,"
-
-### Proposal
-
-Need to go over the DevSecOps survey and find some CI or CI/CD-related content and talk about it.
-
-Then I need to recommend some other CI-content.
-
-Awareness-level
-
-
-
-### Checklist
-
-- [ ] If you have a specific publish date in mind (please allow 3 weeks' lead time)
- - [ ] Include it in the issue title
- - [ ] Give the issue a due date of a minimum of 2 working days prior
- - [ ] If your post is likely to be >2,000 words, give a due date of a minimum of 4 working days prior
-- [ ] If [time sensitive](https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/marketing/blog/#process-for-time-sensitive-posts)
- - [ ] Add ~""Blog: Priority"" label and supplied rationale in description
- - [ ] Mention `@rebecca` to give her a heads up ASAP
-- [ ] If wide-spread customer impacting or sensitive, mention `@nwoods` to give her a heads up ASAP, apply the ~""sensitive"" label, and check the [PR handbook](https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/marketing/corporate-marketing/#requests-for-announcements) in case you need to open an announcement request instead of a blog post issue
-- [ ] If the post is about one of GitLab's Technology Partners, including integration partners, mention `@TinaS`, apply the ~""Partner Marketing"" label, and see the [blog handbook for more on third-party posts](https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/marketing/blog/index.html#third-party-posts)
-- [ ] If the post is about one of GitLab's customers, mention `@KimLock` and `@FionaOKeeffe`, apply the ~""Customer Reference Program"" label, and see the [blog handbook for more on third-party posts](https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/marketing/blog/index.html#third-party-posts)
-- [ ] Indicate if supporting an event or campaign
-- [ ] Indicate if this post requires additional approval from internal or external parties before publishing (please provide details in a comment)",3
-70131443,2020-08-21 21:34:18.058,How to get started with GitLab's pipeline templates - 2020-09-23,"
-
-### Proposal
-
-There has been some confusion in the past on Auto DevOps and that the term means. I think a blog discussing Auto DevOps in the context of pipeline templates would be helpful. I think a tutorial-type of blog post showing how to use these templates, how to customize them, and how to use them to get started quickly with GitLab CI would helpful for developers.
-
-### [Link to draft](https://docs.google.com/document/d/1ccPqcd2CrSM-r5wLriRtTt7TmTndNWJ6XQJzaTFffv8/edit?usp=sharing)
-
-### Checklist
-
-- [x] If you have a specific publish date in mind (please allow 3 weeks' lead time)
- - [x] Include it in the issue title
- - [x] Give the issue a due date of a minimum of 2 working days prior
- - [ ] If your post is likely to be >2,000 words, give a due date of a minimum of 4 working days prior
-- [ ] If [time sensitive](https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/marketing/blog/#process-for-time-sensitive-posts)
- - [ ] Add ~""Blog: Priority"" label and supplied rationale in description
- - [ ] Mention `@rebecca` to give her a heads up ASAP
-- [ ] If wide-spread customer impacting or sensitive, mention `@nwoods` to give her a heads up ASAP, apply the ~""sensitive"" label, and check the [PR handbook](https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/marketing/corporate-marketing/#requests-for-announcements) in case you need to open an announcement request instead of a blog post issue
-- [ ] If the post is about one of GitLab's Technology Partners, including integration partners, mention `@TinaS`, apply the ~""Partner Marketing"" label, and see the [blog handbook for more on third-party posts](https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/marketing/blog/index.html#third-party-posts)
-- [ ] If the post is about one of GitLab's customers, mention `@KimLock` and `@FionaOKeeffe`, apply the ~""Customer Reference Program"" label, and see the [blog handbook for more on third-party posts](https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/marketing/blog/index.html#third-party-posts)
-- [ ] Indicate if supporting an event or campaign
-- [ ] Indicate if this post requires additional approval from internal or external parties before publishing (please provide details in a comment)",2
-70131172,2020-08-21 21:17:15.588,How to get the most out of your YAML configs - 2020-10-01,"
-
-### Proposal
-
-This is a best practices blog post specifically designed for optimizing YAML rather than just pipelines or other CI-related terms. Other platforms discuss YAML and I think it would be helpful for us to talk about this as well.
-
-
-
-### Checklist
-
-- [ ] If you have a specific publish date in mind (please allow 3 weeks' lead time)
- - [ ] Include it in the issue title
- - [ ] Give the issue a due date of a minimum of 2 working days prior
- - [ ] If your post is likely to be >2,000 words, give a due date of a minimum of 4 working days prior
-- [ ] If [time sensitive](https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/marketing/blog/#process-for-time-sensitive-posts)
- - [ ] Add ~""Blog: Priority"" label and supplied rationale in description
- - [ ] Mention `@rebecca` to give her a heads up ASAP
-- [ ] If wide-spread customer impacting or sensitive, mention `@nwoods` to give her a heads up ASAP, apply the ~""sensitive"" label, and check the [PR handbook](https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/marketing/corporate-marketing/#requests-for-announcements) in case you need to open an announcement request instead of a blog post issue
-- [ ] If the post is about one of GitLab's Technology Partners, including integration partners, mention `@TinaS`, apply the ~""Partner Marketing"" label, and see the [blog handbook for more on third-party posts](https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/marketing/blog/index.html#third-party-posts)
-- [ ] If the post is about one of GitLab's customers, mention `@KimLock` and `@FionaOKeeffe`, apply the ~""Customer Reference Program"" label, and see the [blog handbook for more on third-party posts](https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/marketing/blog/index.html#third-party-posts)
-- [ ] Indicate if supporting an event or campaign
-- [ ] Indicate if this post requires additional approval from internal or external parties before publishing (please provide details in a comment)",2
-70123832,2020-08-21 18:00:22.844,Community contribution pipelines fail,"There is a new recurring issue with community contributions to `www-gitlab-com` over the past few weeks. When they create/change an MR, the pipelines fail. When a GitLab team member clicks the “Run Pipeline” button, the pipelines pass - despite making no changes.
-
-Here is an example:
-- https://gitlab.com/gitlab-com/www-gitlab-com/-/merge_requests/59977/pipelines.
-
-Here is an another example:
-- https://gitlab.com/gitlab-com/www-gitlab-com/-/merge_requests/59503
-
-Why is this happening and can it be resolved?
-
-CC @dmurph @johncoghlan @cwoolley-gitlab",2
-70122844,2020-08-21 17:24:39.815,Reapply redirects in pipeline for testing manually,"## Question
-
-Can we reapply redirects manually from a pipeline to a branch after redirects deploy for a newer branch?
-
-## Scenario
-
-Occasionally there will be multiple redirect updates in different branches and we might need to test redirects in an older MR. Right now, redirects are applied to the latest MR with changes to `redirects.yml`. Can we apply redirects manually to older MRs for testing if needed?
-
-@laurenbarker you asked for me to ask this in another MR but I don't have a branch to ask so I created this issue. I'm assigning to you for now, let me know if I can help with any part of it",2
-70091116,2020-08-21 01:48:34.513,Add a visual element on Handbook pages to differentiate it from Marketing pages,"### Proposal
-Add a visual element on the Handbook pages to help differentiate it from Marketing pages.
-
-### What problem is this solving?
-At the moment we have enabled editing with the static site editor on Handbook pages. However some marketing pages look like Handbook pages and it is confusing users why they can't use the static site editor.
-
-An example of this is with the Direction page (https://about.gitlab.com/direction/)
-
-One approach to solving this problem is moving the content to the Handbook. This approach may take a while to coordinate across teams so we are considering a smaller more immediate change on the Handbook side to help users quickly recognise that they are on the Handbook.
-
-| Handbook Page | Non-handbook Page |
-| ------ | ------ |
-|  |  |
-
-_example of two pages looking very similar, however, are in different areas of the site_
-
-### Suggestion
-We are considering changing the background image of the header area of the Handbook.
-
-This would be an extension of what we are already doing with the favicon in the browser for Handbook page
-
-
-### Extra information
-
-The current background image is constructed of a left and a right svg (226x400 px)
-- https://about.gitlab.com/images/home/icons-pattern-left.svg
-- https://about.gitlab.com/images/home/icons-pattern-right.svg
-
-~""group::static site editor"" ~""devops::create"" ~""category::static site editor""",1
-69819365,2020-08-13 22:09:35.802,Add A beginner's guide to GitOps ebook to topics page,"Please select a template from the top left dropdown before continuing.
-
-This repository primarily relates to the logged out marketing website
-https://about.gitlab.com/
-and company handbook
-https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/
-This is not the correct repository for requests related to docs.gitlab.com, the GitLab product, or other items.
-
-If you do not select an appropriate template then your issue might get lost. For more information about our workflows, please reference the handbook for the marketing website
-https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/marketing/website/
-or reference your team documentation.
-
-### FAQ:
-
-Q: Which template should I use?
-
-A: Most people will use the ""-website-bug-report"" or ""-handbook-update"" issue templates. To request updates to existing pages or new content, please visit https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/marketing/growth-marketing/#requesting-support
-
-There are also templates for writing various kinds of blog posts including the unfiltered category. Please see the blog handbook for instructions before you open an issue: https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/marketing/blog/#publishing-process
-
-The rest of the templates are likely specific to team, role, or special occasion.
-
-Q: When will you get to this issue?
-
-A: Your issue will be refined and then prioritized relative to other issues. Marketing's website development team is currently an impacted resource.
-
-Q: How do I link to an issue template?
-
-A: https://gitlab.com/gitlab-com/www-gitlab-com/issues/new?issuable_template=name-of-template
-
-Q: How do I edit this FAQ? I have another question.
-
-A: Submit an issue
-https://gitlab.com/gitlab-com/www-gitlab-com/issues/new
-with FAQ in the title and assign it to @ brandon_lyon or another member of the website team
-https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/marketing/website/",1
-69811553,2020-08-13 16:46:07.190,Commit disable scholarship apply button,"After the deadline passes for the scholarship application process on /events/commit/ we need to disable the ""apply now"" button. The end date is set for Sunday 2020-08-16 so we'll disable it on Monday.",1
-69765124,2020-08-12 14:26:28.836,Phase 2 Website Update - stages-devops-lifecycle/,"```
-
-BL notes to self:
-
-* The parts left for me are outlined in a comment near the bottom
- https://gitlab.com/gitlab-com/www-gitlab-com/-/issues/8738#note_422873185
-
-
-```
-
-This template if for the Marketing Growth Team for their Phase 2 Webpage updates
-
-Title this issue: Phase 2 Website Update - (Page Name)
-
-[Phase 2 Epic](https://gitlab.com/groups/gitlab-com/marketing/growth-marketing/-/epics/23)
-
-## Metadata for page
-- **Intent:**
-- **Goal:**
-- **Who is code owner:**
-- **SME Group:**
-
-## Adjustments to be made:
-These adjustments are from this audit round
-
-- [x] Add metadata
-- [x] Swapping content or content links
-- [ ] Adding pathfactory link
-- [ ] Adjusting SEO
-- [ ] Adding CTA buttons
-- [x] Adjusting copy on CTA buttons
-- [x] Adjusting old/erroneous messaging
-- [ ] Improve mobile optimization
-- [ ] Clean up alignment
-- [ ] Adjust color schemes
-- [x] Swap out old assets
-
-## Roles and Responsibilities
-
-| Role | DRI |
-| ------ | ------ |
-| Project DRI | @rreich |
-| Marketing Analytics | @shanerice |
-| Content/Messaging | @erica|
-| Web Dev | @skarpeles |
-| Brand/Design | @luke |
-| GM Stakeholder | @dmor |
-| PMM approver (copy updates) | @williamchia |
-
-## Production
-**Project DRI**
-- [x] Add design to design tab
-- [ ] Decide on audit items and check-off
-- [ ] Assign to relevant Team Leads for visibility
-- [ ] Make relevant WIP MRs
-- [ ] Add this issue to the page epic description
-- [ ] Close issue once set of MRs is complete
-
-**Team Leads**
-You may make comments in the design tab for tracking, but conversations on updates should be kept to the relevant MRs",3
-122494655,2023-01-26 15:06:16.004,Document how to investigate Release Stage error budget in handbook,"### Overview
-
-This issue tracks the effort to document how to investigate drops in the [error budget](https://dashboards.gitlab.net/d/stage-groups-detail-release/stage-groups-release-group-error-budget-detail?orgId=1).
-
-The aim here is ensure new joiners and other engineers can follow a clear process to investigate such issues moving forward.
-
-### Proposal
-
-- Add a new section in the [Release Group](https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/engineering/development/ops/release) handbook page.
-- Under the new section, document the steps one could follow to investigate issues with the [error budget](https://dashboards.gitlab.net/d/stage-groups-detail-release/stage-groups-release-group-error-budget-detail?orgId=1).",1
-121501070,2023-01-10 08:52:16.864,Evaluate Cube.dev as read abstraction layer for ClickHouse and PostgreSQL,"## Background
-
-One of the exit criteria for [ClickHouse Working group](https://about.gitlab.com/company/team/structure/working-groups/clickhouse-datastore/#exit-criteria) states
-
-> Consider an abstraction layer to interaction with ClickHouse or alternatives
-
-With motivation behind it being the fact that ClickHouse requires significant resources to be run, and for smaller installations of GitLab it might not return investment with provided performance improvement. That in result creates a risk that ClickHouse might not be globally available for all installations and all features would need to account for the fact that there might be different data stores available. In order to avoid placing burned of detecting and handling multiple data stores on each feature implementation an abstraction layer is considered that will abstract specific data store from feature code
-
-## Goal
-
-Build prof of concept prototype that would follow outlined later exercise scenario and provide summary that is going to rate prospect solution agains following criteria:
-
-1. Can all requirements from exercise scenario be completed: (Yes/No)
-1. Can database engine specific functions like ([percentile_disc](https://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.4/functions-aggregate.html)) being used: (Yes/No/After additional work):
-1. Measure execution time for each of the exercise scenarios
-1. Have you encountered any performance issues and/or excessive hardware resources consumption
-
-On scale 1 to 5 (1 - very easy, 5 - very hard):
-1. How complex was to write request to realise outlined scenarios
-1. How complex would be to configure add new table to each of the engines
-1. How complex would be to apply changes to schema of each relations described in the exercise scenario section
-
-## Exercise scenario
-
-Proof of concept prototype with [cube.dev](https://cube.dev/docs/getting-started/docker) must retrieve following information for each of data engines:
-
-1. Total number of clients for each country
-1. Get 75 [percentile](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Percentile) for total price of orders
-2. Find `order_id` of the order that have the biggest total price
-
-Data engines schema details are:
-
-### PostgreSQL
-
-1. Create 4 tables `Clients (id, name, country)`, `Orders(id, client_id, created_at)`, `LineItems(id, item_id, order_id, created_at)` and `Items(id, name, created_at, price)`
-2. Seed tables with 100 clients records
-3. Seed 100 items records
-4. Seed 1000 000 orders, where 250000 orders contain 1 line item, 250000 orders contain 2 lines items, 250000 orders contain 3 lines items, and finally 250000 orders contain 4 lines items
-
-# Clickhouse
-
-1. Create single table `LineItemAddToOrderEvent(id, client_name, client_country, order_id, item_name, item_price, created_at)`
-2. Seed it with 2 500 000 rows",5
-121501019,2023-01-10 08:51:32.587,Collect list of prospect ClickHouse and PostgreSQL abstraction layer solutions,"## Background
-
-One of the exit criteria for [ClickHouse Working group](https://about.gitlab.com/company/team/structure/working-groups/clickhouse-datastore/#exit-criteria) states
-
-> Consider an abstraction layer to interaction with ClickHouse or alternatives
-
-With motivation behind it being the fact that ClickHouse requires significant resources to be run, and for smaller installations of GitLab it might not return investment with provided performance improvement. That in result creates a risk that ClickHouse might not be globally available for all installations and all features would need to account for the fact that there might be different data stores available. In order to avoid placing burned of detecting and handling multiple data stores on each feature implementation an abstraction layer is considered that will abstract specific data store from feature code
-
-## Goal
-
-Collect list of available solutions including both open source ones like cube.dev and option to build one in house. When looking at solution it is not expected to provide in detail evaluation against criteria defined at https://gitlab.com/gitlab-com/www-gitlab-com/-/issues/14402 but rather have them in mind as next steps, and discard solutions that from the first glance seems to not suffice requirements",3
-119014676,2022-11-18 22:42:36.538,"Stop Proposal: Stop maintaining the PPS data on the ""Features by Theme"" page","## Start pointing to the Post purchase survey (PPS) Dashboard
-
-We currently update the `pps_*` values in `features.yml` in order to populate the [Features by Theme page](https://about.gitlab.com/features/by-theme/).
-
-We should discontinue maintaining those values and instead direct the audience to the [PPS Dashboard](https://app.periscopedata.com/app/gitlab:safe-dashboard/1007759/PPS-Dashboard).
-
-## What was the initial objective?
-
-https://gitlab.com/gitlab-com/www-gitlab-com/-/merge_requests/66574 created `features/by-theme` in order to create:
-
-> a page that represents the key features by capability and cleanups some of the listed features for those capabilities. The cleanup mostly involved removing features that seemed duplicative when listed alongside others in the same capability.
-
-https://gitlab.com/gitlab-com/www-gitlab-com/-/merge_requests/84577 added the PPS data to the page ...
-
-But there isn't any additional context on the intent in the MR.
-
-## Are we achieving the objective?
-
-I'm not sure, but updating the pps values to populate that page is an inefficient, time-consuming process.
-
-Now that all of the PPS data is available in Sisense we should utilize it as the primary destination for this type of data.
-
-If grouping the results by pricing theme is valuable to team members, we could explore a way to provide that visualization in Sisense.
-
-## Proposal
-
-1. Remove the PPS values from the table and return the page to its initial design:
-
-
-
-_Wayback machine_
-
-2. Add a link to the page pointing visitors to the PPS Dashboard if they are looking for PPS data for a given feature.
-
-3. Optionally, delete the page entirely if ""Features by Theme"" is no longer used by team members in strategic decision making.
-
-## Traffic
-
-Is there an audience for this page?
-
-The page had 711 visits in calendar year 2022. 509 if you remove that strange spike at the end of August.
-
-
-
-The vast majority are from Google, but I'm not sure what to make of that.
-
-It's an internal-facing page, so the low traffic may not be particularly instructive.",1
-118681487,2022-11-14 15:28:10.712,Feature Flag training for Aaron Huntsman - Q32022,"# Feature Flag And Monitoring Training
-
-[Feature Flags](https://docs.gitlab.com/ee/development/feature_flags/) are used by GitLab engineers in order to roll out changes while
-monitoring the impact.
-
-They are **not the same** as the [**Operations > Feature Flag**](https://docs.gitlab.com/ee/operations/feature_flags.html) feature inside of GitLab.
-
-This template is intended to help understand
-how and when to use this tool in development.
-
-Currently as part of the feature flag process [there is an expectation](https://docs.gitlab.com/ee/development/feature_flags/controls.html#process) that GitLab engineers will monitor their changes with our monitoring tools.
-
-When the changes are low risk and do not require the [change management process](https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/engineering/infrastructure/change-management/#feature-flags-and-the-change-management-process) the expectation is that the engineer conducting the rollout will monitor their change themselves. This training is also designed to allow GitLab engineers to become aware of and comfortable with the [monitoring](https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/engineering/monitoring/) that is provided by the [Infrastructure department](https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/engineering/infrastructure/).
-
-Regardless of risk assessment, **it is expected that the engineer responsible will follow up with the change in production when the flag is flipped**.
-
-Doing so can lower the likelihood of a production issue and if a production issue does occur we can lower the time they last and impact they have.
-
-
-
-## Steps
-
-- [x] Assign this issue to yourself with the title of Feature Flag Training - First Name Last Name - Q#YYYY
-- [x] [Get access](https://docs.gitlab.com/ee/development/feature_flags/controls.html#access) to control feature flags
-
-## Feature flag
-
-### Read
-
-- [x] [Starting with Feature Flags in Development](https://docs.gitlab.com/ee/development/feature_flags/#feature-flags-in-gitlab-development)
-- [x] [Controlling feature flags](https://docs.gitlab.com/ee/development/feature_flags/controls.html)
-- [x] [Pete Hodgson & Martin Fowler on Feature Flags](https://martinfowler.com/articles/feature-toggles.html)
-- [x] [Including a feature behind a feature flag in the final release](https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/product-development-flow/feature-flag-lifecycle/#including-a-feature-behind-feature-flag-in-the-final-release)
-
-
-## Monitoring and Debugging
-
-### Read
-- [x] [GitLab Engineering Monitoring](https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/engineering/monitoring/)
-- [x] [Performance at GitLab](https://docs.gitlab.com/ee/development/performance.html)
-- [x] [GitLab metrics currently being monitored](https://docs.gitlab.com/ee/administration/monitoring/prometheus/gitlab_metrics.html)
-- [x] [Adding Prometheus metrics](https://docs.gitlab.com/ee/development/prometheus_metrics.html)
-- [x] [Logging at GitLab](https://docs.gitlab.com/ee/development/logging.html)
-
-### Watch
-
-### _(Approximately 3 hours)_
-
-- [x] [Observability at GitLab (Internal)](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DVNyH3zQWBo&list=PL05JrBw4t0KpQMEbnXjeQUA22SZtz7J0e) [(Slides)](https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1F_ngvyiF1v7ibMRoWkaE65I9Z3ZxxT2LGh2RqUj90Q0)
-- [x] [Sentry/Kibana Training (Internal)](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o02t3V3vHMs&list=PL05JrBw4t0KpQMEbnXjeQUA22SZtz7J0e)
-- [x] [Sitespeed.io training](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6xo01hzW-f4&list=PL05JrBw4t0KpQMEbnXjeQUA22SZtz7J0e)
-- [x] [Intro to monitoring - GitLab Runners](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wEcoyC1cE5M&list=PL05JrBw4t0KpQMEbnXjeQUA22SZtz7J0e)
-- [x] [How Gitaly uses prometheus](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R6F674Nj3wI&list=PL05JrBw4t0KpQMEbnXjeQUA22SZtz7J0e)
-- [x] [Finding an issue for a specific user in Sentry (Internal)](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NPmv43Rnw9A&list=PL05JrBw4t0KpQMEbnXjeQUA22SZtz7J0e)
-- [x] [How to search for an issue in Kibana](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fKmwH0aNUQQ&list=PL05JrBw4t0KpQMEbnXjeQUA22SZtz7J0e)
-- [x] [GitLab Performance Toolkit Runthrough on 2019 08 27](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HobeuFtfZac&list=PL05JrBw4t0KpQMEbnXjeQUA22SZtz7J0e)
-- [x] [Performance bar demo](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WSVHXmh_Guk&list=PL05JrBw4t0KpQMEbnXjeQUA22SZtz7J0e)
-- [x] [How to create Kibana visualizations for checking performance](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5oF2rJPAZ-M&list=PL05JrBw4t0KpQMEbnXjeQUA22SZtz7J0e)
-
-**Notes**:
-
-As we increase the use of feature flags, engineers have an opportunity/expectation to use our monitoring that they did not have previously.
-
-The [DORA research program](http://services.google.com/fh/files/misc/dora_research_program.pdf) specifically calls out observability and monitoring as being one of 38 key factors driving effective continuous delivery.
-
-The more comfortable we are using the monitoring and observability tools for our systems, the better our outcomes will be in terms of mean-time-to-recovery, individual contributor awareness of infrastructure and scalability concerns, usage of infrastructure engineers' time, and teams' psychological safety.",1
-118088291,2022-11-03 14:42:13.296,Upgrades notes are not rendered correctly,"The content assembly script is not working correctly with the upgrade notes.
-
-In general:
-
-- There's no newline between the items.
-- Dashes are not turned into bullet lists (strangely enough, lists work correctly locally [screenshot](/uploads/e8d744b9bdebb3de5c3e5371e4d1d7f9/Screenshot_2022-11-03_at_15-34-46_GitLab_15.5_released_with_GitLab_Cloud_Seed_and_Autocomplete_suggestions.png))
-
-If we take https://about.gitlab.com/releases/2022/10/22/gitlab-15-5-released/#upgrade for an example, this section was created from three items:
-
-- https://gitlab.com/gitlab-com/www-gitlab-com/-/blob/master/data/release_posts/15_5/utilization-minimum-days-automatic-dormant-user-deactivation-setting.yml
-- https://gitlab.com/gitlab-com/www-gitlab-com/-/blob/master/data/release_posts/15_5/systems-geo-move-container-registry-to-ssf.yml
-- https://gitlab.com/gitlab-com/www-gitlab-com/-/blob/master/data/release_posts/15_5/systems-geo-proxying-fail-to-find-new-pipeline-refs.yml
-
-The end result though is the following. Notice there's no newline between items and lists are not rendered correctly.
-
-",2
-117339418,2022-10-21 18:37:06.534,Update deprecation and removal content guidelines,"## Problem
-
-Right now, we're often treating deprecations like notifications of an incoming removal. But users see a deprecation as a warning that you need to take action, to prevent a breaking change in the future. It's a subtle difference, but important. When they see a deprecation announcement, they expect to be able to do something immediately.
-
-([Original source](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-com/www-gitlab-com/-/issues/13399#deprecations-should-be-actionable))
-
-## Proposed solution
-
-We should make it a requirement that all deprecations are actionable. [This list of Stripe's API changes](https://stripe.com/docs/upgrades#api-versions) shows the kind of implementation we should strive for.
-
-Key terms to take note of: `deprecated in favor of`, `removed in favor of`, `use YYY instead`, etc. It is clearly explained what people need to do for each item.
-
-Examples:
-
-* We have removed tax_percent from objects and requests in favor of tax rates.
-* Deprecate the payment_method.card_automatically_updated webhook in favor of payment_method.automatically_updated.
-* Checkout Sessions no longer include the display_items property. Use the includable line_items property instead.
-
-Then our requirement that breaking changes be announced at least 2-3 milestones before the major milestone means:
-
-* We're *not* giving users 2-3 milestones to *prepare* for the change. We're giving them time to **make** the change.
-* It isn't good enough to just make an announcement, we must have the deprecation *action* available at least 2-3 milestones before the breaking change as well. In fact, the deprecation process could be essentially: ""Step 1, prepare the replacement, step 2, create the deprecation, Step 3...""
-
-### What is the Action when a replacement isn't provided?
-
-The action would be ""Discontinue use of this feature by X.Y.""
-
-### An example that we should try to avoid would be:
-
-* Deprecation: Feature A is being removed, to be replaced with a future feature. Action: Wait for the future feature, and switch to it when it becomes available.
-
-In this case, the deprecation should be delayed until the replacement is available.
-
-## How to do it
-
-- [x] Update process documentation
- - [x] Docs https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/merge_requests/104449
- - [x] Handbook https://gitlab.com/gitlab-com/www-gitlab-com/-/merge_requests/115169
-- [x] Announce updated process and structure examples to Product and TW teams
-- [x] Create follow-up steps with TW and ProdOps stakeholders to review adoption https://gitlab.com/gitlab-com/www-gitlab-com/-/issues/14318",5
-117276377,2022-10-20 21:46:22.281,Update Recruitment Alignment,"#### Updating recruiting alignment page to complete training task and add Jess Dallmar
-
-
-
-Here is the link to the current page https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/hiring/recruiting-alignment/. The update is italicized.
-
-## Talent Acquisition Leader Alignment
-
-| Department | Leader |
-|--------------------------|-----------------|
-| Talent Acquisition | Rob Allen | _Jess Dallmar_
-| Talent Brand and Enablement | Devin Rogozinski |
-| Talent Acquisition (Sales) | Jake Foster|
-| Talent Acquisition (Marketing) | Jake Foster / Steph Sarff |
-| Talent Acquisition (G&A) | Jake Foster |
-| Talent Acquisition (R&D) | Ursela Knezevic |
-| Candidate Experience & Enablement | Marissa Ferber |
-| Inbound Sourcing | Chris Cruz |",1
-116691493,2022-10-11 17:01:24.077,Update Fulfillment handbook page to better describe Slack communications,"
-
-#### Briefly describe the update
-
-
-https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/fulfillment-meta/-/issues/704#note_1122535474
-
-Update the fulfillment page to better describe which slack channels to use for which use cases
-
-
-",1
-116205021,2022-10-03 17:42:43.184,Oracle-Cloud-Infrastructure (OCI) and GitLab DevOps Platform - 2022-10-12,"
-
-## Triage (REQUIRED)
-
-Please note that there is a different process for when you want to announce something via the blog. Please see [announcement requests](https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/marketing/corporate-marketing/#requests-for-announcements) in the handbook and open an announcement request issue instead of a blog post issue.
-
-Generally speaking, engineering blog posts that are tutorials/how-tos or which share how we built or debugged something, are popular with our audience. **If your proposed blog post is aligned with our [Attributes of a successful blog post guidelines](https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/marketing/blog/#attributes-of-a-successful-blog-post), you can skip straight to your [proposal](#proposal).**
-
-If you are pitching something outside of those guidelines, please fill in the below to help us prioritize. You can check out [examples of high- and low-performing blog posts to help with your rationale](https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/marketing/inbound-marketing/content/editorial-team/#top-performing-blog-posts).
-
-**This issue fulfills one of these goals:**
-- [ ] Drive traffic to our website
-- [ ] Convert traffic into leads
-- [ ] Thought leadership/share expertise
-- [x] Build relationships with potential **partner**
-- [ ] Drive long-term results (please explain below in your proposal)
-- [ ] Announcement
- - `Link to announcement request issue (required, see https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/marketing/corporate-marketing/#requests-for-announcements)`
-- [ ] Cross-functional support
- - `Link to OKR (required if this box is checked)`
-
-## Proposal
-
-
-- Talk about Why GitLab DevOps platform --- which leads into Why OCI (Oracle Cloud Platform) and GitLab.
-- Oracle Team (OCI Field CTO potentially) has agreed to contribute to the blog - Goal - keep it below 1200 words
-- We have 2 speaking sessions at Oracle CloudWorld on Oct 17-20
- - 1 Workshop 90 min on how to install & run GitLab on OCI
- - 1 Breakout session 45min on standard GitLab DevOps message
-
-- Blog document [Google-doc-shared-with-OCI](https://docs.google.com/document/d/1oC30CUveeyh6a_udjLzUbhwvXZWbUubeq-7QRGgwYFI/edit) will be converted to MR after OCI inputs are received by **2022-10-05**
-
-## Roles and Responsibilities
-| Person | Role |
-| ------ | ------ |
-| @vkelkar | requestor/author |
-| xyz | OCI Co-author/TBD |
-| @Sgittlen | editor |
-| @hbelz | partner-marketing review |
-
-### Checklist
-
-- [x] If you have a specific publish date in mind (please allow 3 weeks' lead time)
- - [x] Include it in the issue title and apply the appropriate marketing milestone (e.g. `Mktg: 2021-03-28`)
- - [x] Give the issue a due date of a minimum of 2 working days prior
- - [ ] If your post is likely to be >2,000 words, give a due date of a minimum of 4 working days prior
-- [ ] If [time sensitive](https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/marketing/blog/#process-for-time-sensitive-posts)
- - [ ] Add ~""Blog: Priority"" label and supplied rationale in description
-- [ ] If wide-spread customer impacting or sensitive, mention `@nwoods` to give her a heads up ASAP, apply the ~""sensitive"" label, and check the [PR handbook](https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/marketing/corporate-marketing/#requests-for-announcements) in case you need to open an announcement request instead of a blog post issue
-- [x] If the post is about one of GitLab's Technology Partners, including integration partners, mention `@dpduncan`, apply the ~""Partner Marketing"" label, and see the [blog handbook for more on third-party posts](https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/marketing/blog/index.html#third-party-posts)
-- [ ] If the post is about one of GitLab's customers, mention `@FionaOKeeffe`, apply the ~""Customer Reference Program"" label, and see the [blog handbook for more on third-party posts](https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/marketing/blog/index.html#third-party-posts)
-- [x] Indicate if supporting an event - **Oracle CloudWorld** Oct 17-20, Las Vegas, USA
-- [ ] Indicate if this post requires additional approval from internal or external parties before publishing (please provide details in a comment)
-
-## Production
-- [ ] Requestor to complete issue template (Triage, Proposal, Roles and Responsibilities, Checklist )
-- [ ] Issue sent through triage for consideration (pitch, planning/in progress, review, scheduled)
-- [ ] Issue assigned to requestor to draft blog post and open MR
-- [ ] MR created and linked to issue - issue is now deprecated in favor of MR and will close once MR is complete",3
-112256596,2022-07-26 19:12:05.393,Low engagement on Release post MVP nominations,"# Summary
-
-We would like to request some ideas on how to increase the number of MVP nominations we receive on a monthly basis. It's an important component of the release post that gives us a chance to live out our values of Collaboration and Inclusion, but with each milestone, we receive very few nominations and the same contributors are nominated again and again.
-
-## Current process
-
-1. An MVP nomination issue is generated for each release post cycle: [15.2 example](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-com/www-gitlab-com/-/issues/13658)
-1. The [issue template](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-com/www-gitlab-com/-/blob/master/.gitlab/issue_templates/release-post-mvp-nominations.md) mentions `@gl-product @gitlab-org/coaches @gitlab-com/marketing/community-relations` in order to increase awareness amongst relevant teams
-1. The release post manager solicits nominations on the 7th and 12th by sharing a link to the nomination issue in the following Slack channels `#release-post, #community-relations, #mr-coaching #core`
-1. The release post manager makes a selection from the nominations on the 15th, or escalates the lack of a nominee in those same channels
-
-## Contributing to this issue
-
-1. Scan the issue to see if your idea has already been contributed
-1. Start a thread with a recommendation to increase MVP nominations
-
-@gl-product @gitlab-org/coaches @gitlab-com/marketing/community-relations",2
-111330974,2022-07-07 18:13:00.471,Apply `removal_milestone` filter to the Deprecations page via URL parameter,"## Problem
-
-Creating the Breaking Changes blog post is challenging to coordinate. It is necessary because it makes it easy for customers to find all the breaking changes in one place without any noise.
-
-## Proposed solution
-
-If the deprecations page could be filtered by removal_milestone and breaking_change in the URL (i.e. `https://docs.gitlab.com/ee/update/deprecations.html?removal_milestone=16.0&breaking_change=true`) this URL could then serve as the SSOT for breaking changes instead of a blog post.
-
-We use broadcast messages (and in 16.0, we hope to incorporate email) to direct customers to ""See all the Breaking Changes coming in X.Y.""
-
-- [x] [Filter by removal milestone](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-docs/-/merge_requests/2906)
-- [ ] Filter by breaking change
-
-## Current limitation
-
-Currently, the filtering UI on the deprecations page does not update the URL when a filter is selected. So, there isn't a way to link to a URL that will automatically apply a filter.",1
-110599373,2022-06-23 09:05:12.734,New release post template feedback,"After seeing a few notes about the new release post layout on socials I thought it would be a good idea to create an issue to collate feedback.
-
-Relates to !105999 and https://gitlab.com/gitlab-com/marketing/digital-experience/buyer-experience/-/issues/979",2
-110573994,2022-06-22 20:03:12.941,Adding Work Zones to Handbook Scheduling Meetings Page,"
-
-#### Briefly describe the update
-
-
-Adding a reference on Handbook page that shows overlaps in different work zones (EMEA/APAC/AMER) which will help when scheduling meetings across multiple work zones. A better definition of ""friendly"" times across three work zones.
-
-
-",0
-110263706,2022-06-16 22:18:46.285,Application metrics mvc/poc,"### What
-
-The intention is to build out a minimal viable product or proof of concept for application metrics within the GitLab project. Artifacts from this effort should be:
-
-- Application metric sent to Prometheus (think code block timing)
-- Dashboard showing this metric build on prometheus (aggregated like averages/P95/other?)
-- Playbook for other teams showing how to product application metrics and dashboards
-
-The intention is to provide team members with metrics that enable them to performance tune their code.
-
-### Why
-
-Metrics is one component of our tooling that will enable team member efficiency, reduce chances for customer visible outages, and help avoid security and other bugs. More information on this effort can be found here: https://gitlab.com/gitlab-com/www-gitlab-com/-/issues/13521
-
-### When
-
-The minimal viable product or proof of concept will ideally be complete before the end of the quarter.
-
-### Questions
-
-- How much effort is involved?
- - This is up to the team who agrees to take on this task. There may be libraries needed, processes, and/or methodologies developed but fundamentally this is more a proof of concept that is functioning - think a roller skate rather than a car wheel.
-- Others?",2
-107154835,2022-04-25 17:48:01.528,Reduce the frequency of trainee maintainers in Reviewer Roulette,"From the [2022-04-25 Maintainership working group](https://docs.google.com/document/d/1RuWhO2q7rsgSKrnSCf2xsOrp56SXBHe_z5XKDls5px8/edit#) we discussed that maintainers and trainees sometimes take their busy indicator off, and immediately get several reviews. Because trainee maintainers get 3 times the amount of a regular reviewer (so that they get more experience), this can be even more overwhelming. We should consider reducing this.
-
-
-### Context
-
-Initially, [trainees were weighted higher](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-foss/-/issues/60035) at 3x as a trial but it does not look like we ever followed up. At the time, this would have meant a trainee maintainer gets picked 3/39 of the time.
-
-Today, [Roulette works by](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/ruby/gems/gitlab-dangerfiles/blob/master/lib/danger/plugins/roulette.rb#L147) creating a list of reviewers, traintainers, and maintainers. Since traintainers _are_ reviewers, this means they are added to the list 4x [(3x for being a traintainer and 1 more time for being a reviewer)](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-com/www-gitlab-com/-/issues/13298#note_924545182).
-
-Does this still make sense?
-
-### Data
-
-Here is a brief sample of preliminary data:
-
-For frontend:
-- 25 maintainers
-- 11 trainee maintainers
-- 21 reviewers (10 non-trainees)
-- Chances of a regular reviewer getting picked: 1/21 or 4% of the time
-- Chances of a trainee maintainer getting picked: 4/21 or 19% of the time
-- Chances of a maintainer getting picked: 1/25 or 4% of the time
-
-For backend:
-- 44 maintainers
-- 19 trainee maintainers
-- 55 reviewers (36 non-trainees)
-- Chances of a regular reviewer getting picked: 1/55 or 2% of the time
-- Chances of a trainee maintainer getting picked: 4/55 or 7% of the time
-- Chances of a maintainer getting picked: 1/44 or 2% of the time
-
-For database:
-- 9 maintainers
-- 5 trainee maintainers
-- 19 reviewers (14 non-trainees)
-- Chances of a regular reviewer getting picked: 1/19 or 5% of the time
-- Chances of a trainee maintainer getting picked: 4/19 or 21% of the time
-- Chances of a maintainer getting picked: 1/9 or 11% of the time
-
-### Resources
-- [Roulette logic](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/ruby/gems/gitlab-dangerfiles/-/blob/master/lib/danger/plugins/roulette.rb)
-- [Roulette Dangerfile](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/blob/master/danger/roulette/Dangerfile)
-
-### Plan
-
-- [x] Reduce trainee maintainers weight in Roulette - see https://gitlab.com/gitlab-com/www-gitlab-com/-/issues/13298#note_972867144
- - https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/ruby/gems/gitlab-dangerfiles/-/merge_requests/132, https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/ruby/gems/gitlab-dangerfiles/-/merge_requests/134 and https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/merge_requests/90389
- - new Roulette calculation
- ```
- # +------------------------------+--------------------------------+
- # | reviewer type | weight(times in reviewer pool) |
- # +------------------------------+--------------------------------+
- # | reduced capacity reviewer | 1 |
- # | reviewer | 2 |
- # | hungry reviewer | 4 |
- # | reduced capacity traintainer | 1 |
- # | traintainer | 2 |
- # | hungry traintainer | 6 |
- # +------------------------------+--------------------------------+
- ```
-- [x] Communicate this change in EWIR(engineering week in review) and development slack channel",3
-105901639,2022-04-01 16:09:17.857,"Could we add a ""Special Recognitions"" content block for Group MVPs, notable contributions, etc.?","Could we add a ""Special Recognitions"" content block for Group MVPs, notable contributions, etc.?
-
-Following on from [a conversation in Slack](https://gitlab.slack.com/archives/C3TRESYPJ/p1646837064632809?thread_ts=1646759801.045189&cid=C3TRESYPJ):
-
-`@ogolowinski`: ""I wonder if we can make a group MVP? Add a new category for community collaboration?""
-
-`@fseifoddini`: ""I love the idea of special recognitions content block in the release post, if we wanna discuss in retro or do a proposal issue, regardless.""
-
-`@cbacharakis`: ""I don't see a reason for not having more than one MVP, especially in this case where everyone worked together towards the same goal. It also encourages people to work together as pairs/teams which increases the sense of ownership and collaboration.""
-
-@ogolowinski @cbacharakis @sam.white @johncoghlan @NicoleSchwartz @fseifoddini What are the merits of adding a ""Special Recognition"" section to the template versus modifying the code and process to allow for multiple MVPs in a given release?
-
-For what it's worth, modifying the template to allow for multiple MVP entries in a release would be trivial.",3
-108502762,2022-03-15 04:38:11.673,Proposal: Improve deprecation/removal documentation and process,"Prod Ops release notes DRI is on board with the general direction of this proposal. Please see [this comment](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-com/www-gitlab-com/-/issues/13399#note_1135324831) for more details.
-
-## Proposals
-
-### Change from separate deprecation/removal pages to ""Important changes in GitLab XX"" pages.
-
-The current pages are too big, and the lists will grow forever, so we should have pages for each
-major version and all minor versions until the next major version. So one page for GitLab 14,
-one for GitLab 15, and so on.
-
-Most breaking changes happen in the major milestone, so if the new pages are sorted by milestone,
-starting with XX.0, the breaking changes will be near the top of the page.
-
-### Only use ""deprecation""/""removal"" terminology if it's truly a deprecation or a removal.
-
-The documentation should be flexible enough that a PM/EM can write the exact information
-that users need to know, without needing to massage the language to fit the ""deprecation -> removal""
-concept.
-
-We could:
-
-- Just ensure it's clear that these notifications can use whatever language is needed to match the change
-- Document a stricter third style for non-deprecation/removal content (with examples).
-- Have a completely separate place for ""notable changes"".
-
-Example important changes that might need to be explained differently than deprecations/removals.
-
-- Feature flag status changes.
-- Limit additions/changes.
-- Changes to a feature, like where it is in the UI, the tier changing, etc.
-- API/GraphQL changes might warrant different language as well, or even a different page as these are very common but clutter the pages. Perhaps one page for REST deprecations/changes, one for GraphQL?
-- Feature that are no longer recommended, or perhaps no longer being developed, but not yet deprecated. ""Feature A is no longer in development, but current users can continue using it and receiving support.""
-
-`@brhea` pointed out how Ruby handles this by noting everything that isn't a deprecation or a removal under ""Notable changes"" for each release. For example: https://guides.rubyonrails.org/6_0_release_notes.html#active-support
-
-### Deprecations should be actionable
-
-This is a suggestion to improve the deprecation process itself.
-
-Right now, we're often treating deprecations like notifications of an incoming removal.
-But users see a deprecation as a warning that you need to take action, to prevent
-a breaking change in the future. It's a subtle difference, but important.
-When they see a deprecation announcement, they expect to be able to do something immediately.
-
-We should make it a requirement that all deprecations are fully actionable. Some
-examples:
-
-- Deprecation: `types` keyword being removed from CI/CD configuration.
- Action: Start using the `stages` keyword, which already exists.
-- Deprecation: Certificate-based Kubernetes integration being removed from GitLab.
- Action: Start using the Agent for Kubernetes (already exists).
-- Deprecation: Pseudonymizer feature is being removed from GitLab, with no replacement.
- Action: Stop using Pseudonymizer.
-
-Then our requirement that breaking changes be announced at least 2-3 milestones
-before the major milestone means:
-
-- We're _not_ giving users 2-3 milestones to _prepare_ for the change. We're giving them
- time to **make** the change.
-- It isn't good enough to just make an annoucement, we must have the deprecation
- _action_ available at least 2-3 milestones before the breaking change as well.
- In fact, the deprecation process could be essentially: ""Step 1, prepare the replacement,
- step 2, create the deprecation, Step 3...""
-
-An example that we should try to avoid would be:
-
-- Deprecation: Feature A is being removed, to be replaced with a future feature.
- Action: Wait for the future feature, and switch to it when it becomes available.
-
-In this case, the deprecation should be delayed until the replacement is available.
-
-### Non-deprecation breaking changes
-
-We also need to think about the language for non-deprecation breaking changes,
-as well as the action users should take. For example:
-
-- A feature being moved to Ultimate-only shouldn't be considered a deprecation,
- but is a breaking change that should be announced early. The action would be to upgrade to Ultimate,
- or stop using the feature. We can document examples of several kinds of announcement styles.
-- A new limit being added, especially to .com, isn't a deprecation, but would require action. Like
- ""The maximum numbers of jobs in a pipeline will be set to 1234"". The action would
- then be to bring the project within the limit range before it is added.
-
-## Previous issue content
-
-
-Click me to expand/collapse.
-
-As we've come closer and closer to 15.0, we've increasingly seen problems with the deprecation/removal notification process.
-
-Currently, the process is to ""deprecate"" and notify users at least 2 releases before we then ""remove"" and notify users of the removal. Deprecations and removals can be considered Breaking Changes, or not.
-
-But this somewhat simple process is not flexible enough for the variety of important changes that we implement each month, and repeated complaints seem to highlight this.
-
-- Quotes from the thread in https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/merge_requests/84339#note_901244690:
- - `That is not what deprecation notices are for. They mean ""Check for a replacement NOW, so you don't have issues later.""`
- - `It's a different story for ""we are just dropping this without replacement, stop using it"" deprecations.`
- - `The ""deprecated"" makes it sound like you should not use it anymore, which is why people are concerned about a lack of replacement.`
-- From: https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/merge_requests/82646#note_874257859
- - `it seems like we're experiencing some scope creep as to what qualifies as a deprecation/removal. I've also been asked by other PMs to add things to the deprecation/removal doc that aren't deprecations or removals. To my knowledge, the deprecations/removals doc isn't for breaking changes that aren't caused by feature deprecations/removals.`
-- From: https://gitlab.com/gitlab-com/www-gitlab-com/-/issues/13230#note_923349881
- - (Paraphrasing) A breaking change notice was late because it was neither a deprecation nor a removal, and it was not intuitive that it should be added to either page.
-- etc...
-
-## Expanding on the issues
-
-### Breaking changes
-
-Breaking changes can come from all types of changes, including:
-
-- Removals
-- Limits (New/changed)
-- Feature flag default state changes.
-- Feature defaults changing from to on/off (or off/on).
-- Feature changing tiers.
-- Any other change in behavior that forces a user to take action before they can continue to work as normal.
-
-It's notable that the only page that exists for these breaking changes is the removals page. I'm not considering the deprecations page for this, because a deprecation itself is not actually a breaking change (though it may warn of a future breaking change).
-
-### Deprecations:
-
-People generally expect deprecation warnings to mean: ""Stop doing X"" (often combined with a ""Start doing Y instead""). But our deprecation announcements are rarely that clear or simple, and the variability is huge:
-
-- Sometimes immediately actionable:
- - ""The `types` keyword is deprecated, start using the `stages` keyword"".
- - ""The X integration has been discontinued and will not be replaced."" (The action is to just stop using the feature) outright.
-- Sometimes not immediately actionable:
- - ""The X feature is deprecated, it will be replaced in milestone Y.yy.""
- - ""This feature's behavior will change in future milestone Y.yy""
-
-We also have trouble with many deprecation notices not really being deprecations, but being written as such to make it fit on the page, because there is no other place for these announcements. For example (paraphrased):
-
-- Using this feature in the Premium tier is deprecated and will be removed in 15.0. It is not deprecated for use in Ultimate.
-- Using more than X jobs in a pipeline is deprecated and will be removed in 15.0.
-
-### Removals
-
-Similar to the issues raised in the breaking changes section above, the removals page will have a huge variety of types of removals in 15.0 (if we use the earlier deprecation notices as a prediction). But many of these will not be things we'd consider deprecations, but are listed there because they are breaking changes that we want people to be aware of.
-
-### Product documentation
-
-Outside of the deprecation/removals pages, we have a lot of feature docs that may or may not also have details about the upcoming changes, and I'm not sure we've got a solid standard for what to do with the feature docs.
-
-- Should deprecation/removal warnings be in the feature docs too?
-- Should removed features continue to be documented to support self-managed users on older versions that are still supported by GitLab support?
-
-## Brainstorming
-
-I believe we should make significant changes to our processes for deprecations/removals/breaking changes, and have some ideas.
-
-### Idea 1 - Limit use of `Deprecation` terminology
-
-We should only use the term `Deprecation` when we mean: ""Stop doing A, start doing B.""
-
-In many cases, it seems like ""End of development"" announcements might make more sense. For a real example: https://docs.gitlab.com/ee/ci/yaml/#only--except. This is even more useful when there is no replacement yet available.
-
-### Idea 2 - New page for important announcements
-
-Instead of a deprecation page and a removal page, we could have one ""Notable changes"" (title TBD) page where we list everything we think people should really know about. It can be important changes to feature in the current milestone, or planned changes to features in future milestones.
-
-Breaking changes of **any** kind can then be added to the page. New limits, feature changes, removals, etc. If it's important for people to know, we can put it there.
-
-We have badges in the docs (see the red ultimate here: https://docs.gitlab.com/ee/administration/monitoring/gitlab_self_monitoring_project/#take-action-on-prometheus-alerts), with on-hover text, and a link. We could add a new `Breaking Change` badge to add to all sections on this doc that are considered breaking changes. On-hover text will give a little bit more detail, and clicking it will bring you to a page that gives more details about breaking changes in general. Like major "".0"" milestones for most breaking changes, minor milestones for important security fixes, etc.
-
-Sorting up for discussion, but perhaps some kind of ""Milestone when you can/need to do something about it"". For example, a deprecation could be announced in any milestone, but perhaps should be listed under the milestone when the replacement is expected to be available. A removal warning for an integration being dropped in 15.0 with no replacement should be a breaking change warning listed under 15.0.
-
-### Idea 3 - Have boilerplate language for product docs
-
-Similar to our documentation for feature flagged features: https://docs.gitlab.com/ee/development/documentation/feature_flags.html#use-a-note-to-describe-the-state-of-the-feature-flag
-
-We should have a warning box style for important notices about the feature (or we can just reuse `FLAG:`), along with a collection of standard language that can be copied and pasted into the box and added to the feature docs themselves.
-
-I expect the language to be simple and clear, and easily pasted as needed. You may need to mix and match. Some potential examples:
-
-- This feature has reached end of development and will no longer receive updates, but can still be used.
-- This feature is deprecated. You should now use Y instead.
-- This feature will be removed in X.xx. You will need to use Y.
-- This limit will be increased/decreased in X.xx. To prepare, you should Y.
-- This feature's feature flag will be enabled by default in XX.x. To prepare, self managed users can X. SaaS users can Y.
-- etc... (these are all just quick ideas, the language is not polished yet)
-
-## Extras
-
-- Should we be thinking about severity of the changes?
-- We should research what other companies are doing for these kinds of announcements.
-- I imagine self managed users would love it if all breaking changes were added 2 releases ahead of a major milestone, but behind a disabled feature flag. They'd have two full releases to enable the flag whenever they want, and they'd be fully ready when the major milestone comes around that sets the flag to enabled by default (because it'll already be enabled on their instance). Wouldn't work for SaaS...
-- How to handle security breaking change announcements?
-
-# OLD Previous Issue discussion
-
-In https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/merge_requests/82646#note_874257859, @ngaskill points out:
-
-> It seems like we're experiencing some scope creep as to what qualifies as a deprecation/removal. I've also been asked by other PMs to add things to the deprecation/removal doc that aren't deprecations or removals. To my knowledge, the deprecations/removals doc isn't for breaking changes that aren't caused by feature deprecations/removals. Something for the TW team to discuss.
-
-Is _everything_ we are adding to the ""deprecations"" and ""removals"" pages truly a deprecation or removal?
-
-Some examples of breaking changes that are not deprecations:
-
-- A project setting changing from default disabled to default enabled. Happens from time to time, and could easily be a breaking change, but not a deprecation.
-- Instance limit updates. Happens quite frequently actually, usually to improve performance or reduce potential abuse of a limit that was too high. You try to rewrite it to make it more like a deprecation by focusing on the ability that is being removed: ""The ability to create job names with more than 256 characters is being deprecated"". I don't think most people consider that a deprecation though, and it might be more easily understood as simply a new limit: ""We are introducing a limit on the length of job names"" (not a deprecation).
-
-So how do we handle notifying users about:
-
-- Non-breaking change deprecations.
-- Breaking change deprecations.
-- Breaking changes to features that are not being deprecated, ex: https://docs.gitlab.com/ee/update/deprecations.html#changes-to-the-ci_job_jwt
-- New instance limits, ex: https://docs.gitlab.com/ee/update/deprecations.html#cicd-job-name-length-limit
-- Tightening of security, like stricter permissions, ex: https://docs.gitlab.com/ee/update/deprecations.html#graphql-permissions-change-for-package-settings
-
-Right now, they are all being put in the same deprecations and removals pages due to being similar, but they are not exactly the same.
-
-### Proposals
-
-Perhaps we should:
-
-- Rename the pages? Some initial brainstorming ideas:
- - `Deprecations and planned changes` / `Removals and changes`
- - `Deprecations and announcements` / `Removals and important changes`
- - `Deprecations and planned breaking changes` / `Removals and breaking changes`
- - `Planned changes` / `Important changes by GitLab release version`
- - `Planned breaking changes` / `Breaking changes by GitLab release`
-- Change what's on the page?
-
- A lot of the suggestions above relate to changing the focus on the pages from deprecations to essentially ""Any important change we really want users to be aware of"". So perhaps, along with a rename, we should change what kind of content is on these pages. Looking at deprecations, for example, these are some of the options:
- - List all deprecations only, both breaking and non-breaking. <- Current
- - List all deprecations, and also non-deprecation changes that are breaking.
- - List only breaking changes. That includes deprecations, but does NOT include deprecations that are not breaking changes.
-
- This is an interesting idea, because I suspect what people really need/want to know are the _breaking changes_, no matter the type. Deprecations that are not breaking, like the removal of support of some integration that already didn't work because the related product itself is gone, doesn't need to be documented here, does it? It could be handled in the regular feature docs?
-
- ",8
-102175774,2022-02-10 00:03:05.879,Release Post Item generator is creating MRs for deprecations and removals in the wrong repo,"### Description
-
-For context: https://gitlab.com/gitlab-com/www-gitlab-com/-/merge_requests/84700#note_837950452
-
-Since deprecations and removals used to be release blog post items, the generator creates MRs in `www-gitlab-com` if an Issue matches any `release post item::` label.
-
-Which includes ~""release post item::deprecation"" and ~""release post item::removal""
-
-### Challenge
-
-These MRs are now noisy because we've updated the deprecations and removals process.
-
-Deprecation and removal MRs are now created in the `gitlab` project and compiled directly into GitLab Docs.
-
-### Proposal
-
-- [ ] Tweak the generator so that it only creates MRs for ~""release post item"" Issues and Epics that are not ~""release post item::deprecation"" or ~""release post item::removal""
-
-### Nice to have
-
-- [ ] Create the MR in the `gitlab` project following [the updated process](https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/marketing/blog/release-posts/#deprecations)",1
-101485957,2022-01-28 18:46:05.333,Perform release post content assembly with a bot,"### Summary
-
-[Content assembly: merging release post items (content blocks) to your branch](https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/marketing/blog/release-posts/#content-assembly-merging-release-post-items-content-blocks-to-your-branch) could be run on a regular basis by a Bot. The RPM's responsibility would be to check the branch for issues rather than running the assembly themselves.
-
-### Proposal
-
-**Option A: Simple**
-
-Create a job that runs the once nightly, where `X-Y` is the active milestone.
-
-```
- git checkout master
- git pull
- git checkout release-X-Y
- git pull
- git merge master
- bin/release-post-assemble
- git push
- git push origin release-X-Y
-```
-
-**Option B: [Specific](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-com/www-gitlab-com/-/issues/12865#note_820269872)**
-
-> I think that a commit should queue a pipeline that checks if the branch name matches the release post naming convention (e.g. release-x-y). If the branch matches that naming convention run the content assembly script for every commit. If the pipeline fails, email the committer that their commit needs to be fixed (or better yet, slack them).
-
-Related: https://gitlab.com/gitlab-com/www-gitlab-com/-/issues/12865#note_815576374",2
-100379857,2022-01-10 17:43:00.765,Document prioritization sessions in handbook,"
-
-#### Briefly describe the update
-
-Document prioritization sessions in handbook, a planning tool in times of uncertainty and lack of direction.
-
-Link from/to:
-- https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/product-development-flow/
-- https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/product/product-processes/#using-the-rice-framework
-
-",1
-99637901,2021-12-22 15:29:11.291,Slack integrations for release post announcements and notifications,"## Proposal
-
-- if the release post MR pipeline fails, notify on Slack
-- if the release post MR is merged, notify on Slack",2
-99627970,2021-12-22 12:51:55.763,Blog Post: Parent-child pipelines VS multi-project pipelines (title TBD),"
-
-## Triage (REQUIRED)
-
-Please note that there is a different process for when you want to announce something via the blog. Please see [announcement requests](https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/marketing/corporate-marketing/#requests-for-announcements) in the handbook and open an announcement request issue instead of a blog post issue.
-
-Generally speaking, engineering blog posts that are tutorials/how-tos or which share how we built or debugged something, are popular with our audience. **If your proposed blog post is aligned with our [Attributes of a successful blog post guidelines](https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/marketing/blog/#attributes-of-a-successful-blog-post), you can skip straight to your [proposal](#proposal).**
-
-If you are pitching something outside of those guidelines, please fill in the below to help us prioritize. You can check out [examples of high- and low-performing blog posts to help with your rationale](https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/marketing/inbound-marketing/content/editorial-team/#top-performing-blog-posts).
-
-**This issue fulfills one of these goals:**
-- [x] Drive traffic to our website
-- [ ] Convert traffic into leads
-- [x] Thought leadership/share expertise
-- [ ] Build relationships with potential customers
-- [x] Drive long-term results (please explain below in your proposal)
-- [ ] Announcement
- - `Link to announcement request issue (required, see https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/marketing/corporate-marketing/#requests-for-announcements)`
-- [ ] Cross-functional support
- - `Link to OKR (required if this box is checked)`
-
-## Proposal
-
-
-
-Write how [parent-child pipelines](https://docs.gitlab.com/ee/ci/pipelines/parent_child_pipelines.html) and [multi-project pipelines](https://docs.gitlab.com/ee/ci/pipelines/multi_project_pipelines.html) features can help tacking growing complexity of CI/CD pipelines. Describe the advantages of using [one feature over the other one](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/273399) and highlight [key differences](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/336884) to help customers choose the right approach for their needs.
-
-## Roles and Responsibilities
-| Person | Role |
-| ------ | ------ |
-| @fabiopitino | requestor |
-| `@person`| editor |
-| `@person` | approver (optional) |
-
-### Checklist
-
-- [ ] If you have a specific publish date in mind (please allow 3 weeks' lead time)
- - [ ] Include it in the issue title and apply the appropriate marketing milestone (e.g. `Mktg: 2021-03-28`)
- - [ ] Give the issue a due date of a minimum of 2 working days prior
- - [ ] If your post is likely to be >2,000 words, give a due date of a minimum of 4 working days prior
-- [ ] If [time sensitive](https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/marketing/blog/#process-for-time-sensitive-posts)
- - [ ] Add ~""Blog: Priority"" label and supplied rationale in description
-- [ ] If wide-spread customer impacting or sensitive, mention `@nwoods` to give her a heads up ASAP, apply the ~""sensitive"" label, and check the [PR handbook](https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/marketing/corporate-marketing/#requests-for-announcements) in case you need to open an announcement request instead of a blog post issue
-- [ ] If the post is about one of GitLab's Technology Partners, including integration partners, mention `@dpduncan`, apply the ~""Partner Marketing"" label, and see the [blog handbook for more on third-party posts](https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/marketing/blog/index.html#third-party-posts)
-- [ ] If the post is about one of GitLab's customers, mention `@FionaOKeeffe`, apply the ~""Customer Reference Program"" label, and see the [blog handbook for more on third-party posts](https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/marketing/blog/index.html#third-party-posts)
-- [ ] Indicate if supporting an event or campaign
-- [ ] Indicate if this post requires additional approval from internal or external parties before publishing (please provide details in a comment)
-
-## Production
-- [x] Requestor to complete issue template (Triage, Proposal, Roles and Responsibilities, Checklist )
-- [ ] Issue sent through triage for consideration (pitch, planning/in progress, review, scheduled)
-- [ ] Issue assigned to requestor to draft blog post and open MR
-- [ ] MR created and linked to issue - issue is now deprecated in favor of MR and will close once MR is complete",3
-98345949,2021-12-02 15:31:01.956,Link from UX handbook to guidelines on discussing competitors in public,"The following discussion from !94038 should be addressed:
-
-- [ ] @pedroms started a [discussion](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-com/www-gitlab-com/-/merge_requests/94038#note_740219469): (+4 comments)
-
- > these kinds of discussions are not specific to Product Designers or other members of the UX department. I frequently witness Product Managers engaging in similar discussions and sharing competitor features. I wonder if there's a more generic location for this? Maybe as a sub-page of our SAFE guidelines?
-
-## Proposal
-
-> I'm thinking the [UX Department “How we work” page](https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/engineering/ux/how-we-work/) might be a good place to link to these new guidelines.",1
-94063241,2021-09-21 19:39:58.111,Fix Timeout Issue Estimated cost of Abuse KPI,"https://app.periscopedata.com/app/gitlab/780726/WIP:-Blocked-User-Usage-Data?widget=12404680&udv=0 sometimes times out because the query takes too long, need to optimize it.
-
-Look at using monthly table instead of `legacy.gitlab_dotcom_project_statistic_snapshots_daily` to reduce time",3
-94056594,2021-09-21 17:01:22.306,create corrective action charts,"From slack
-> @dawsmith
-thanks @meks - adding @amoter who was looking to do some more estimates on arrival/close rates
-
-> Right now we have https://app.periscopedata.com/app/gitlab/787921/Corrective-Actions showing the cumulative overdue corrective actions over time. I think we were looking to add a daily or weekly arrival/close graph of corrective actions
-
-Add charts for:
-
-- [x] how many new infrastructure CAs were created in a week
- - https://app.periscopedata.com/app/gitlab/787921/Corrective-Actions---Infrastructure?widget=12802448&udv=0
-- [x] how many infrastructure CAs were closed in a week
- - https://app.periscopedata.com/app/gitlab/787921/Corrective-Actions---Infrastructure?widget=12802466&udv=0
-- [x] if possible, broken down by sev/priority levels
-- [x] of the closed, how many have the label ""workflow-infra::cancelled"" and how many have the label ""workflow-infra::done""
- - https://app.periscopedata.com/app/gitlab/787921/Corrective-Actions---Infrastructure?widget=12845002&udv=0
-
-## UPDATE
-Corrective actions dashboard & KPI logic changed to only include corrective actions under [Infrastructure project](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-com/gl-infra/infrastructure)",1
-93283696,2021-09-07 19:18:19.636,Add/hide blog tags,"I'd like to add a tag to the blog tags/categories:
-
-
-DevOps Platform
-
-Here are associated posts you can use to queue this up:
-
-https://about.gitlab.com/blog/2021/09/03/the-code-review-struggle-is-real-heres-what-you-need-to-know/
-https://about.gitlab.com/blog/2021/09/02/the-journey-to-a-devops-platform/
-https://about.gitlab.com/blog/2021/08/03/welcome-to-the-devops-platform-era/
-https://about.gitlab.com/blog/2021/06/22/gitlab-14-modern-devops/
-https://about.gitlab.com/blog/2021/05/19/agile-planning-with-a-devops-platform/
-
-And I'd like to make
-
-Unfiltered
-
-invisible, if that's possible. Thanks much!",1
-91893991,2021-08-12 20:16:58.543,Stacked MR Chart based on group,"I'd like to see a stacked chart based on group for MRs.
-
-Ideally I'd either have filter capability for the type of MR (feature, bug, etc.) OR I can also just have it for feature MRs.
-
-It may end up being a performance indicator, but right now I need it to assess how our product investment is going and which teams are still doing feature work.",1
-91519750,2021-08-05 18:20:13.415,Ensure accuracy of group->stage-> section label,"Currently snippets pull
-
-- group -> group (group label)
- - Snippet: https://app.periscopedata.com/app/gitlab/snippet/select_group_name_from_label/5563886fad9b48bb857880de1e7cd019/edit
-
-- stage -> stage (devops label)
- - Snippet: https://app.periscopedata.com/app/gitlab/snippet/select_stage_from_label/554ade7075c54af092bb6075603302d2/edit
-
-- stage -> section (section label)
- - Snippet: https://app.periscopedata.com/app/gitlab/snippet/development_section_by_stage_label/55b957e9630748308ed9c61b09707b86/edit
-
-
-Long term we should create a sheetload or mapping table that has group -> stage-> section
-
-cc @kwiebers @lmai1 @meks",3
-91161629,2021-07-30 16:02:39.380,add issue_links dbt model,"To support analysis that links infradev issues to incidents need to create usable dbt dim model for issue_links table
-
-added to MR: https://gitlab.com/gitlab-data/analytics/-/merge_requests/5251",3
-91102633,2021-07-29 15:52:15.078,Create Dimensional Model to support MR metrics,"Create fact/dim/mart tables to support current & future MR metrics to make queries faster & add more of the logic in dbt modeling layer
-
-Final table should include fields needed for MR based Metrics:
-- [ ] is_part_of_product (uses ops & .com data)
-- [ ] daily history of MRs with state at each day (merged vs open)
-- [ ]",8
-91102065,2021-07-29 15:45:59.740,Create Dimensional Model Tables to support Issue Metrics and improve rendering performance,"Create Dimensional Models to support end fact/mart table that will support all the issue metrics we use, especially ""Open Age"" Metrics & Label based metrics
-
-See https://gitlab.com/gitlab-data/analytics/-/merge_requests/5251 for example of how to do this
-
-Final Table should include
-- [x] historical dates by day of issues & state at that time (open v closed)
-- [ ] common labels with correct valid dates (ex. sev 2 from Jan 1 2020 -> Jan 3, then Sev 3 afterwards
- - see corrective actions snippet for guidance
- - [x] Severity Labels
- - [ ] Priority Labels
- - [ ] section/stage/group labels
- - [ ] Incident labels (is_incident)
-- [x] full label array included
-- [x] issue age
-- [x] issue age since severity label was added
-- [x] full linkable issue URL
-- [x] array of assigned users",8
-91038488,2021-07-28 17:26:28.232,Review Corrective Actions Logic,"When working on Infradev Issue logic, found might need to adjust corrective action logic to stop tracking issue age once they have been closed (remove historicals from current averages)",3
-90938109,2021-07-27 17:49:08.162,"Follow-up from ""add ytTracker.digestPotentialVideos() to video modal""","The following discussion from !86913 should be addressed:
-
-- [ ] @laurenbarker started a [discussion](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-com/www-gitlab-com/-/merge_requests/86913#note_635786114): (+5 comments)
-
- > @@dennis106 ping me when we're ready to deploy this MR. Thanks!",1
-90935416,2021-07-27 16:44:21.658,Visibility of InfraDev issues and work stream type allocations,"
-
-Based on the recent discussions in Engineering Allocations, the goal is to track `infradev` issues on age per product groups. From @sloyd
-
->>>
-We need to clear up the delineation of Corrective Actions vs infradev escalations as they aren’t the same, yet there is also overlap.
->>>
-
-@andrewn also has done weekly reports in this in https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/infradev-reports/-/issues/5#summary-by-severity
-
-### To-DO
-- [x] Create Central Eng Metrics for S1 Open Age, S2 Open Age & Table
- - https://app.periscopedata.com/app/gitlab/798401/Infrastructure-Embedded-Dashboard
-- [x] Create Infradev Summary Dashboard with Filters
- - https://app.periscopedata.com/app/gitlab/899982/InfraDev
-- [x] add metric for # of related incidents of infradev issues to match what gets shown in Andrew's infradev report
- - tracking in https://gitlab.com/gitlab-com/www-gitlab-com/-/issues/12226
-
-### Requirements
-
-* Create a new filterable equivalent dashboard similar to [corrective actions](https://app.periscopedata.com/app/gitlab/787921/Corrective-Actions) but only honed in for infradev
-* Key charts:
- * Past due infradev
- * Average age of open infradev
- * Ability to view as a holistic view that can drill down to each product groups
-* We need to be able to see how each product teams are doing and if they are able to keep up.
-* Lean on our philosophy of measuring open things
-
-
-### Examples of the key charts
-
-
-
-
-## Plan
-* We are aligned on the metric `Open InfraDev Age`. This aligns with other Eng PIs (OMA, OBA, Open UX Debt Age) Reasons:
- * As a long-term indicator, provide a measure that captures the total effort. Average Age of Open achieves this, we give credit to efforts when any open issue is fixed
- * Give agency to each team to prioritize what is most severe, a recent infradev S2 may need action now than an older infradev S2 (example from this https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/333184)
- * Facilitate a 2 way direction of recognizing completed efforts and feedback loop. e.g.
- * A product group team is doing well if `Open InfraDev Age` is going down.
- * A product group team needs help if `Open InfraDev Age` is going up.
- * Slice this by severity
- * This negates the complication of restarting SLOs when severity shifts, we set teams to focus on burning down infradev in each severity as one bucket. The first being S1 and S2 which is the agreed on path from the last meeting.
-* @davis_townsend to create:
- * Open InfraDev Age S1 chart (add total number of issues in the backdrop)
- * Open InfraDev Age S2 chart (add total number of issues in the backdrop)
-* @lmai1 to add a table at the end showing list of Open infradev issues (S1/S2)
-* @lmai1 will ensure the handbook dashboard structure is accurate https://gitlab.com/gitlab-com/www-gitlab-com/-/issues/12154
-* This dashboard https://app.periscopedata.com/app/gitlab/798401/Infrastructure-Embedded-Dashboard is filterable down to every stage and group and is in our handbook dashboards https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/engineering/metrics/dev/create/#infrastructure-indicators
- * This will provide visibility into each teams and if we need to dial up more
-* Separately we already have types of MRs merged per stage/group in the Development Indicators section of the same pages
- * This will tell us what type of work needs to increase/decrease
- * 
-* We aim to have this in by next Engineering Allocation meeting.
-
-
-
-### Dashboards
-
-Main entry point https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/engineering/metrics
-
-cc @lmai1 for your visibility as this may also come up for development analytics",5
-90853626,2021-07-26 14:42:48.338,Refresh query for Incident Root Cause,"I suspect that we're not querying the right data, probably due to the recent change to Incident Issue type?
-
-https://app.periscopedata.com/app/gitlab/793517/Infrastructure-Incident-Data?widget=10637568&udv=1311208
-
-What I note is that the July number of incidents is way down (inconsistent with our real incident count), and doesn't show any root cause info",1
-90576932,2021-07-20 19:07:41.000,Investigate Long Loading Time of PI Pages,"Stakeholders have brought up the long loading times of the PI Pages as an issue.
-
-Examples:
-
-* https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/engineering/infrastructure/performance-indicators/
-* https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/engineering/development/performance-indicators/
-
-We should investigate if this mainly a problem with the query times of the PIs or with rendering time of the charts
-
-If the issue is rendering time, will probably need help from others to improve that, but if the issue the queries we can improve that load time by optimizing the longest running queries, & eliminating excess PI charts
-
-
-## Ideas
-
-### Backend performance
-
-* @davis is currently looking into query performance
-* Davis: Looked at query times of the underlying performance. Have processing be done at Snowflake.
-
-### Frontend performance
-
-* Render only KPIs Don’t render charts for (Regular) RPIs, requiring a click thru to Sisense instead
-* Lazy load RPIs on scroll
-* Only render RPIs in a popup/modal if someone mouses-over an icon
-* Other?
-
-cc @edjdev",3
-90521726,2021-07-19 21:01:17.510,August 2021 Key Review PI Prep,"Items to review/change before August 2021 Key Meeting:
-
-- [ ] Looking to have handbook PI page as storyboard approach, order KPI/PI in order that makes most sense (most-> least important for department head or other logical ordering)
-- [ ] add DRI attribute to PIs?
-- [x] Write Comments on KPI changes
- - [x] correcting data to reflect more accurate total cost for hosting with removal of the one time credits & offsets
- - [x] introduced PI for % of labeled spend for cost visibility
-
-- [x] make overview video
- -> include DRIs in video for updates?",3
-90511450,2021-07-19 16:49:24.289,Update Availability graph - June 2021 data,"The observability issue we were seeing last week in relation to the last month reporting for Availability has been resolved.
-
-June availability was 99.84%
-https://dashboards.gitlab.net/d/general-slas/general-slas?orgId=1&from=now-1M%2FM&to=now-1M%2FM
-
-Please update this in the availability csv and reflect it in the chart. I don't seem to have perms to do this after the changes to get the 2 decimal points showing.
-
-Also, the display on https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/engineering/infrastructure/performance-indicators/#gitlabcom-availability only shows to March, even though the April and May data should already be in the csv.",1
-90146363,2021-07-12 19:18:46.010,Remove Top 3 oldest open vulnerabilities by severity PI,"- Consider this as a duplicate of a new ""Open Vulnerability Age"" metric & get rid of this as a PI
-- Recommend keeping the linked chart as part of new vulnerability age dashboard as it's a useful view
-- use average instead of median for ""Open Vulnerability Age"" calculation if want to prioritize old vulnerability more",1
-90146262,2021-07-12 19:15:33.355,Security Automation Iteration Velocity PI,"As issues can vary a lot in how much work they are, would this be better as using weights with weighting methodology instead of issues?
- - probably better unless trying to make team members create issues that are as broken down as possible
-
-- I would consider Security Automation Iteration Velocity Average as a duplicate & only use 1 of them as the PI",3
-90146142,2021-07-12 19:11:28.081,SecAuto OKR/epic progress PI change,"- Does OKR progress need to be tracked as PI? already tracked as a OKR in Ally right?
-- For epics, I don't think this fits in as a PI since epics are constantly being opened so would never reach 100% target.
-- I would suggest removing this altogether as a PI, but keep dashboard for tracking if want to see that view
- - Other KPi/PI should represent goals of the department, PIs represent tracking towards those goals, & epics will represent progress towards those metrics/goals. So a PI for epic progress is redundant",1
-90146070,2021-07-12 19:09:01.738,Third Party Risk Management PI,"Bring in data & create PI as # of medium/high risk vendors over time, with target of 0?",3
-90145909,2021-07-12 19:06:32.913,Security Observations (Tier 3 Risks) PI,Could we bring this data into Sisense & create metric that is just count of these as bar/line chart & then provide details in the dashboard?,3
-90145847,2021-07-12 19:04:33.061,Operational Security Risk (Tier 2 Risks) Management PI,"Currently a heatmap, could we bring this data into Sisense & choose a normal bar/line chart visualization instead while still capturing the important data?",3
-90039651,2021-07-09 18:25:06.907,Remove Secure Software Dependency Program Maturity PI,Can we recreate this dataset & chart in Sisense & link to that instead of linking to a google slides presentation?,1
-90039374,2021-07-09 18:18:25.867,SIRT Incidents PI changes,"Seems like we have multiple PIs/KPIs around SIRT incidents:
-
-- Security Engineer On-Call Page Volume (Security Incidents that required paging someone)
-- Security Incidents by Category
-- ~~Security Incidents by Impacted Organization~~
-
-I propose we keep the KPI, remove the other as PI, & move all these charts to new ""Security Incidents"" standalone dashboard to provide this detail.
-
-Question: Do we really need these to be standalone PIs, or do we just want to be able to see them readily?",5
-90039206,2021-07-09 18:10:58.238,Cost of Abuse KPI,"- [x] Define KPI
- - [x] Which categories to include as part of cost of abuse?
- - [x] CI + Networking (egress to China + APAC for now)
- - [x] For CI quantify blocked abuse usage + some measure of human time",8
-90038998,2021-07-09 18:03:39.747,Security Control Health KPI,"Any way we can track this data over time & have it in Sisense/ data warehouse? Is this tracked in a spreadsheet somewhere?
-
-Current KPI: https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/engineering/security/performance-indicators/#security-control-health
-
-Examples for redesign: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1_-Bm_vVLPNts1xmshNjH2NDN3GjLPxJGyBreh0uqQYk/edit?usp=sharing",1
-90038858,2021-07-09 17:58:42.588,Security Engineer On-Call Page Volume KPI change,"- [ ]
add target (consider making target logic simpler, maybe just 50% over avg of last 12 months) No target because it's a stacked bar chart.
-- [ ]
add Sisense chart embed if not confidential, otherwise note confidential This is mentioned in the KPI description `For Security purposes, please view this chart directly in Sisense.`
-- [X] kpi definition mentions severity, anything we should consider about differing severity for this KPI?
-- [x] match KPI naming with chart name in Sisense
-
-
-https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/engineering/security/performance-indicators/#security-engineer-on-call-page-volume
-
-https://app.periscopedata.com/app/gitlab/592612/Security-KPIs?widget=9217413&udv=0",3
-90038748,2021-07-09 17:52:53.007,Avg Age of Vulnerability KPI change,"- [x] Change Avg Age of Vulnerability to match OBA logic https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/engineering/quality/performance-indicators/#s1-oba
- - [x] Alternatively, if mainly want to track towards SLO, consider changing to # open vulnerabilities past SLO (similar to corrective actions past SLO)
-- [x] if metric needs to be confidential add confidential note, if not add sisensechart embed",3
-90036605,2021-07-09 16:41:48.535,Create % labeled spend PI,"In order to maintain accurate visibility into our cloud costs as we scale, we need to make sure we are labeling/tagging resources according to our standards: https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/infrastructure-standards/ for the majority of our spend so that we can accurately forecast & tie back costs to actionable buckets of spend.",3
-89985430,2021-07-08 18:47:41.924,Pricing page code cleanup v1,"## Before creating an issue
-
-- [x] I have reviewed the [Setting yourself up for success](https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/marketing/inbound-marketing/digital-experience/website/#requesting-support) section of the website handbook.
-- [x] I acknowledge that any content updates should also update [social media content](https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/marketing/corporate-marketing/social-marketing/admin/#data-needed-on-pages-in-order-for-links-to-work-on-social-media) such as [images](https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/marketing/corporate-marketing/social-marketing/#social-media-design), titles, and descriptions on relevant pages. Not doing this can negatively impact related campaigns.
-
-## Where would this project happen?
-
-#### Insert here a bulleted list containing any URLs that we'll be updating or creating:
-
-- https://about.gitlab.com/pricing/
-
-## What does the request INCLUDE?
-
-#### Insert the request here:
-- Remove unused code/experiments",1
-89981544,2021-07-08 16:49:20.825,Incorporate GItLab Incident Severities into issues dbt model,"Once `issuable_severities` base model is in dbt, need to use that severity field in main `issues_xf` model to bring that in.
-
-Logic will basically look like a CASE statement where it pulls from `issuable_severities` severity field first if they exist, & if not then tried to use current label method. That should bring in severities for both GitLab Incidents & GitLab Issues in same model",3
-89981402,2021-07-08 16:45:38.876,add issuable_severities table to Data warehouse,"As part of https://gitlab.com/gitlab-com/www-gitlab-com/-/issues/11978 we need to bring a new table `issuable_severities` into the data warehouse to get the right severity values for GitLab Incidents
-
-
-- [x] add to manifest
-- [x] create source tables
-- [x] create base model",5
-89871533,2021-07-07 02:40:52.107,Pricing page updates,"## Before creating an issue
-
-- [x] I have reviewed the [Setting yourself up for success](https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/marketing/inbound-marketing/digital-experience/website/#requesting-support) section of the website handbook.
-- [x] I acknowledge that any content updates should also update [social media content](https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/marketing/corporate-marketing/social-marketing/admin/#data-needed-on-pages-in-order-for-links-to-work-on-social-media) such as [images](https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/marketing/corporate-marketing/social-marketing/#social-media-design), titles, and descriptions on relevant pages. Not doing this can negatively impact related campaigns.
-
-## Where would this project happen?
-
-#### Insert here a bulleted list containing any URLs that we'll be updating or creating:
-
-- https://about.gitlab.com/pricing/
-
-## What does the request INCLUDE?
-
-#### Insert the request here:
-- Change ""FREE"" to ""Free"" on mobile.
-- Remove brackets around text.
-- Add clarity that CI/CD minutes are for SaaS Only (tooltips, content changes).",1
-89852531,2021-07-06 17:20:10.285,fix exec summary links for inherited PIs,executive summary links are broken for Inherited PIs now that URLs are reverted to how they were previously (changed in https://gitlab.com/gitlab-com/www-gitlab-com/-/merge_requests/82711),1
-89503466,2021-06-29 22:02:56.263,Rename Vacancy Time to Fill KPI,"From Eric's feedback in https://gitlab.com/gitlab-com/www-gitlab-com/-/merge_requests/84142#note_614685642, rename Vacancy Time to Fill KPI to ""Average Age of Open Vacancies""
-
-- [ ] Renamed Metric for `Engineering Division` https://gitlab.com/gitlab-com/www-gitlab-com/-/merge_requests/85641
-- [ ] Renamed Metric for ~""Customer Support Department"" https://gitlab.com/gitlab-com/www-gitlab-com/-/merge_requests/85639
-- [ ] Renamed Metric for ~""Development Department"" https://gitlab.com/gitlab-com/www-gitlab-com/-/merge_requests/85637
-- [ ] Renamed Metric for ~""Infrastructure Department"" https://gitlab.com/gitlab-com/www-gitlab-com/-/merge_requests/85252
-- [ ] Renamed Metric for ~""Quality Department"" https://gitlab.com/gitlab-com/www-gitlab-com/-/merge_requests/85826
-- [ ] Renamed Metric for ~""UX Department"" https://gitlab.com/gitlab-com/www-gitlab-com/-/merge_requests/85827
-- [ ] Renamed Metric for ~""Security Department"" https://gitlab.com/gitlab-com/www-gitlab-com/-/merge_requests/85830",1
-89494055,2021-06-29 17:15:34.070,remove inherited badge,remove inherited badge next to KPI titles,1
-89438170,2021-06-29 00:33:31.659,Add Incubation to team page,Add Incubation Department to team page.,1
-89265315,2021-06-24 19:33:14.630,Create a Channel Instant Marketing handbook page,https://gitlab.com/gitlab-com/marketing/partner-marketing/-/issues/353,5
-89258556,2021-06-24 16:21:02.527,Ensure all KPI charts/dashboards are set to auto refresh,"Ensure all KPI charts/dashboards are set to auto-refresh for monthly key/group conversations. Open a separate data team issue.
-
-Engineering Division
-1. https://app.periscopedata.com/app/gitlab/620621/Engineering-Handbook-MR-Rate
-2. https://app.periscopedata.com/app/gitlab/686926/Engineering-Division-MR-Rate
-3. https://app.periscopedata.com/app/gitlab/842240/Engineering-Division-New-Hire-Location-Factor-Shared-Dashboard
-4. https://app.periscopedata.com/app/gitlab/864877/Team-Member-Retention-Dashboard
-5. https://app.periscopedata.com/app/gitlab/872394/Average-Age-of-Open-Positions
-
-Development Department
-1. https://app.periscopedata.com/app/gitlab/899982/InfraDev
-2. https://app.periscopedata.com/app/gitlab/761256/Largest-Contentful-Paint-at-P90
-3. https://app.periscopedata.com/app/gitlab/705845/Renewal-Customer-Satisfaction
-4. https://app.periscopedata.com/app/gitlab/862325/Development-Department-Retention
-5. https://app.periscopedata.com/app/gitlab/929641/Development-Department-Average-Age-of-Open-Positions
-6. https://app.periscopedata.com/app/gitlab/871128/Open-MR-Review-Time-(OMRT)
-
-Quality Department
-1. https://app.periscopedata.com/app/gitlab/516343/Quality-Department-KPIs
-2. https://app.periscopedata.com/app/gitlab/862331/Quality-Department-Retention
-3. https://app.periscopedata.com/app/gitlab/856737/S1-Open-Bug-Age-(OBA)
-4. https://app.periscopedata.com/app/gitlab/856747/S2-Open-Bug-Age-(OBA)
-5. https://app.periscopedata.com/app/gitlab/878780/Time-to-first-failure-(TtFF)
-6. https://app.periscopedata.com/app/gitlab/872455/Open-Community-MR-Age-(OCMA)
-
-UX Department
-1. https://app.periscopedata.com/app/gitlab/462325/UX-KPIs
-2. https://app.periscopedata.com/app/gitlab/882285/Product-Design-MRs
-3. https://app.periscopedata.com/app/gitlab/862334/UX-Department-Retention
-
-Security Department
-1. https://app.periscopedata.com/app/gitlab/641782/Appsec-KPIs
-2. https://app.periscopedata.com/app/gitlab/592612/Security-KPIs
-3. https://app.periscopedata.com/app/gitlab/847984/ZenGRC-Point-in-Time-Screenshots-(Interim-Dashboard)
-4. https://app.periscopedata.com/app/gitlab/780726/WIP:-Blocked-User-Usage-Data
-5. https://app.periscopedata.com/app/gitlab/862338/Security-Department-Retention
-
-Support Department
-1. https://app.periscopedata.com/app/gitlab/463858/Engineering-KPIs
-2. https://app.periscopedata.com/app/gitlab/855241/Customer-Wait-Time-Ratio
-3. https://app.periscopedata.com/app/gitlab/862336/Support-Department-Retention
-4. https://app.periscopedata.com/app/gitlab/686943/Support-Department-MR-Rate
-5. https://app.periscopedata.com/app/gitlab/621060/Support-Handbook-MR-Rate
-
-Incubation Department
-1. https://app.periscopedata.com/app/gitlab/908949/Incubation-Engineering-Department-MR-Rate",3
-89249001,2021-06-24 13:37:56.838,Experiment - Pricing page: Reverse plan tiers,"* Reverse tiers so ""Ultimate"" is first and ""Free"" is last.
-* Using LaunchDarkly (AB testing tool), track conversion rate.",2
-89195597,2021-06-23 20:05:46.418,"Create a ""Confidential"" Health state for PIs","## Summary
-
-With a increasing emphasis on correctly maintaining confidential information many of the Infrastructure PIs no longer indicate [health status](https://0623-sloyd-infra-pi.about.gitlab-review.app/handbook/engineering/infrastructure/performance-indicators/#health), but by doing so the status defaults to ""Unknown"".
-
-
-
-This is confusing though as there is a difference between what we really intend when we show status Unknown vs. when it is actually known but just can't be displayed due to confidentiality.
-
-## Proposal
-- Create a ""Confidential"" Health status with appropriate icon...(maybe transparent background with black text so as not to imply anything via other coloring?)
-- Update the Health legend in the template for all PIs
-- Review all Eng department PIs for those which should switch to use the new status
-
-## Actions
-- [ ] Discuss among Engineering Data Analytics and Eng Dept heads to validate the problem.
-- [ ] Eng Data Analytics represents the proposal to other Divisions
-- [ ] Implement above proposal (or the iteration we arrive at)",3
-89191553,2021-06-23 18:41:48.412,Ensure we capture the next steps for PIs with health attention and problem,"From the recent Key Reviews,
-
-> For the items that are noted as a problem or attention, can you include get well plan, actions taken from the last meeting and lessons learned. If it helps, I could provide a template for this. Thanks. Purpose is that a lot of people on the call can learn from what y’all are doing.
-
-From feedback in my 1-1 factoring this in the the structure would be overkill. The suggestion would be to remind folks to capture next steps in the bullets.",1
-88933261,2021-06-18 12:22:50.135,Update middleman to avoid reference through git ref,"With !78850 (#10917, gitlab-org&5149) and !73459, we introduced the Git ref to use middleman gem with Ruby 2.7/3.0 support, but the upstream just released 4.4.0 (2021-06-16), so it is time to switch back to the official release.
-
-- https://github.com/middleman/middleman/releases/tag/v4.4.0
-- https://rubygems.org/gems/middleman/versions/4.4.0",4
-88900508,2021-06-17 19:50:54.862,OBA S1 S2 Polishes,"* Please make this 2 years - I want to set OBA S1 to green since we improved alot from 2 years ago. When it is 1 year the context is lost.
- * https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/engineering/quality/performance-indicators/#s1-open-bug-age-oba
- * https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/engineering/quality/performance-indicators/#s2-open-bug-age-oba
-* Also the number of outstanding issue is mismatched between OBA S1 and Average Age
-https://app.periscopedata.com/shared/ae618b53-194d-40ed-a3ca-7f0d4ca9a492?
-
-| Previous | Current |
-| ------ | ------ |
-|  |  |",2
-88839393,2021-06-16 21:08:21.424,Non headcount budget PI is stale,"From UX Key Review, we discovered that the non-headcount budget PI is stale. Clarify broadly for all PIs
-
-## Tasks
-* Data is in Adaptive hence all charts are stale
-* This data is confidential hence directed to Sisense for `target`
-* Set `health` to unknown
-* Link tracking issue in PI description https://gitlab.com/gitlab-com/www-gitlab-com/-/issues/11464
-* Addresses https://gitlab.com/gitlab-com/www-gitlab-com/-/issues/11970
-
-## MRs
-* Engineering https://gitlab.com/gitlab-com/www-gitlab-com/-/merge_requests/85248
-* ~""UX Department"" https://gitlab.com/gitlab-com/www-gitlab-com/-/merge_requests/84607
-* ~""Quality Department"" https://gitlab.com/gitlab-com/www-gitlab-com/-/merge_requests/85245
-* ~""Development Department"" https://gitlab.com/gitlab-com/www-gitlab-com/-/merge_requests/85249
-* ~""Security Department"" https://gitlab.com/gitlab-com/www-gitlab-com/-/merge_requests/85253
-* ~""Customer Support Department"" (dashboard deleted) https://gitlab.com/gitlab-com/www-gitlab-com/-/merge_requests/85251
-* ~""Infrastructure Department"" https://gitlab.com/gitlab-com/www-gitlab-com/-/merge_requests/85252
-
-cc @gl-quality/eng-analytics",1
-88836313,2021-06-16 20:41:22.301,Standardize all KPI's current month's bar to have a different color,"- From June 2021 UX Key review Purple bar for TW MR Rate for current month
-- This helps reduce back/forth between stakeholders, not having this differentiation leads to a false sense of urgency when we don't have all the data for the current month
-- We have a guideline to have this as optional https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/engineering/metrics/#guidelines.
-
-
-## Proposal
-- Standardize green bar for current month for all KPIs
-
-| Current | Desired |
-| ------ | ------ |
-|  |  |
-
-
-### Challenges
-- Team implements this via 2 code sections and is the equivalent of creating 2 charts into 1.
-- Explore helpers
- - Is there a visualization library that we can plug in ? do it at the visualization level and not the calculation.
- - render API ? for “color” gives no result, so not looking promising
- - ask Sisense what’s possible in terms of styling that doesn’t muddy up business logic?
-
-### Completion
-- [x] Completed for `Engineering Division` KPIs @lmai1
-- [x] Completed for `Engineering Division` PIs @lmai1
-- [X] Completed for ~""Customer Support Department"" KPIs @lmai1
-- [X] Completed for ~""Customer Support Department"" PIs @lmai1
-- [x] Completed for ~""Development Department"" KPIs @lmai1
-- [x] Completed for ~""Development Department"" PIs @lmai1
-- [x] Completed for ~""Infrastructure Department"" KPIs @davis_townsend
- - Availability fix being tracked in https://gitlab.com/gitlab-com/www-gitlab-com/-/issues/11910
-- [x] Completed for ~""Quality Department"" KPIs @davis_townsend
-- [X] Completed for ~""Quality Department"" PIs @lmai1
-- [x] Completed for ~""Security Department"" KPIs @davis_townsend
-- [X] Completed for ~""UX Department"" KPIs @lmai1
-- [X] Completed for ~""UX Department"" PIs @lmai1",8
-88760171,2021-06-15 16:10:19.719,Deprecate Hiring Actuals v Plan,"After https://gitlab.com/gitlab-com/www-gitlab-com/-/issues/11418 is closed, we should be able to deprecate hiring actuals v plan metric for all eng departments
-
-- [ ] Removed Metric for `Engineering Division` https://gitlab.com/gitlab-com/www-gitlab-com/-/merge_requests/85641
-- [ ] Removed Metric for ~""Customer Support Department"" https://gitlab.com/gitlab-com/www-gitlab-com/-/merge_requests/85639
-- [ ] Removed Metric for ~""Development Department"" https://gitlab.com/gitlab-com/www-gitlab-com/-/merge_requests/85637
-- [ ] Removed Metric for ~""Infrastructure Department"" https://gitlab.com/gitlab-com/www-gitlab-com/-/merge_requests/85252
-- [ ] Removed Metric for ~""Quality Department"" https://gitlab.com/gitlab-com/www-gitlab-com/-/merge_requests/85826
-- [ ] Removed Metric for ~""UX Department"" https://gitlab.com/gitlab-com/www-gitlab-com/-/merge_requests/85636
-- [ ] Removed Metric for ~""Security Department"" https://gitlab.com/gitlab-com/www-gitlab-com/-/merge_requests/85635",1
-88539505,2021-06-10 19:20:28.018,Promote Retention to KPI for all departments,"From weekly team meeting today, as per Eric's feedback we should promote the recently introduced Retention Metric to KPI for each department along with Time to Fill Vacancies
-
-- [x] Completed for `Engineering Division`
- - https://gitlab.com/gitlab-com/www-gitlab-com/-/merge_requests/84142
-- [x] Completed for ~""Customer Support Department""
- - https://gitlab.com/gitlab-com/www-gitlab-com/-/merge_requests/84127
-- [x] Completed for ~""Development Department""
- - https://gitlab.com/gitlab-com/www-gitlab-com/-/merge_requests/84129
-- [x] Completed for ~""Infrastructure Department""
- - https://gitlab.com/gitlab-com/www-gitlab-com/-/merge_requests/83163
-- [x] Completed for ~""Quality Department""
- - https://gitlab.com/gitlab-com/www-gitlab-com/-/merge_requests/84131
-- [x] Completed for ~""Security Department""
- - https://gitlab.com/gitlab-com/www-gitlab-com/-/merge_requests/84134
-- [x] Completed for ~""UX Department""
- - https://gitlab.com/gitlab-com/www-gitlab-com/-/merge_requests/84133",1
-88403567,2021-06-08 15:31:39.886,Cookie consent script adjustments,"Per the related Marketing Ops issue, https://gitlab.com/gitlab-com/marketing/marketing-operations/-/issues/5018#note_595713842, we need to adjust the javascript responsible for OneTrust to load sooner.
-
-I plan to move this logic into the same spot as the cookiebot logic in the includes/layout/head file.
-
-This shouldn't negatively impact anything, but since we can only test it on production, it's theoretically possible to break cookiebot or accidentally introduce OneTrust to unexpected pages.
-
-I shall carefully monitor the deployment and follow up with regression tests.",1
-88306816,2021-06-07 08:42:36.817,Have the 'Knowledge_Design_Collection' route LCP under 4s,"[The route's dashboard.](https://dashboards.gitlab.net/d/000000043/sitespeed-page-summary?orgId=1&var-base=sitespeed_io&var-path=desktop&var-testname=gitlab&var-group=gitlab_com&var-page=Knowledge_Design_Collection&var-browser=chrome&var-connectivity=cable&var-function=median&var-resulturl=https:%2F%2Fs3.amazonaws.com%2Fresults.sitespeed.io&var-screenshottype=jpg)
-
-The current LCP metrics at the time of the issue's creation:
-
-
-
-We should aim at moving the LCP down to under 4 seconds at minimum. Moving it below 2.5s is the ultimate goal but is not essential for this issue.",2
-88194125,2021-06-04 04:45:24.412,GitLab.com Availability - display 2 decimal points in chart mouseover,"## Problem
-The chart for [GitLab.com Availability](https://0603infra-pi.about.gitlab-review.app/handbook/engineering/infrastructure/performance-indicators/#gitlabcom-availability) displays only 1 decimal point in the mouseover display, which is insufficient detail for a metric such as availability.
-
-
-
-## Expected Outcome
-Figure out how to display at 2 decimal points, or validate that this isn't possible...in which case we need to open (or escalate) a product request with Sisense.",5
-88070253,2021-06-02 01:13:51.209,Broken links on /continuous-delivery/,"## Before creating an issue
-
-- [x] I have reviewed the [Setting yourself up for success](https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/marketing/inbound-marketing/digital-experience/website/#requesting-support) section of the website handbook.
-- [x] I acknowledge that any content updates should also update [social media content](https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/marketing/corporate-marketing/social-marketing/admin/#data-needed-on-pages-in-order-for-links-to-work-on-social-media) such as [images](https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/marketing/corporate-marketing/social-marketing/#social-media-design), titles, and descriptions on relevant pages. Not doing this can negatively impact related campaigns.
-
-## Where would this project happen?
-
-#### Insert here a bulleted list containing any URLs that we'll be updating or creating:
-
-- https://about.gitlab.com/stages-devops-lifecycle/continuous-delivery/
-## What does the request INCLUDE?
-
-#### Insert the request here:
-- 2 Broken links under ""What is GitLab continuous delivery?""
-- 1 Broken link under ""Multicloud deployment""",1
-88059535,2021-06-01 18:55:49.564,Minor Pricing page updates,"## Before creating an issue
-
-- [x] I have reviewed the [Setting yourself up for success](https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/marketing/inbound-marketing/digital-experience/website/#requesting-support) section of the website handbook.
-- [x] I acknowledge that any content updates should also update [social media content](https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/marketing/corporate-marketing/social-marketing/admin/#data-needed-on-pages-in-order-for-links-to-work-on-social-media) such as [images](https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/marketing/corporate-marketing/social-marketing/#social-media-design), titles, and descriptions on relevant pages. Not doing this can negatively impact related campaigns.
-
-## Where would this project happen?
-
-#### Insert here a bulleted list containing any URLs that we'll be updating or creating:
-
-- https://about.gitlab.com/pricing/
-
-## What does the request INCLUDE?
-
-#### Insert the request here:
-- Free-forever features for individual users
-- Enhance your team productivity and coordination
-- Organization wide security, compliance, and planning
-- Remove Free-forever features bullet
-- Remove ""Get"" before each of the CI minutes
-- Free static websites => Static websites
-- Remove [1] after No credit card required (keep it for 400 CI minutes)",1
-87828945,2021-05-27 16:38:56.630,Pricing page minor updates,"## Before creating an issue
-
-- [x] I have reviewed the [Setting yourself up for success](https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/marketing/inbound-marketing/digital-experience/website/#requesting-support) section of the website handbook.
-- [x] I acknowledge that any content updates should also update [social media content](https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/marketing/corporate-marketing/social-marketing/admin/#data-needed-on-pages-in-order-for-links-to-work-on-social-media) such as [images](https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/marketing/corporate-marketing/social-marketing/#social-media-design), titles, and descriptions on relevant pages. Not doing this can negatively impact related campaigns.
-
-## Where would this project happen?
-
-#### Insert here a bulleted list containing any URLs that we'll be updating or creating:
-
-- https://about.gitlab.com/pricing/
-
-## What does the request INCLUDE?
-
-#### Insert the request here:
-
-Per Slack feedback from Sid,
-
-- The 'Get x,0000 CI/CD minutes per month' items should have a bullet in front, not a + (don't expand it, remove the percent comparison)
- - Engineer's note: This was updated on both the control and test variants.
-- The text 'Buy Premium for DevOps' and 'Buy Ultimate for DevOps' doesn't make sense to me, I suggest saying 'Buy GitLab Premium' and 'Buy GitLab Ultimate'.
- - Engineer's note: I did this on only the test variant. I did not update the control variant at this time.",1
-87773272,2021-05-26 20:08:48.977,"Follow-up from ""Add inline_svg extension and leverage in heading component for event template""","The following discussion from !82454 should be addressed:
-
-- [ ] @laurenbarker started a [discussion](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-com/www-gitlab-com/-/merge_requests/82454#note_583828959): (+5 comments)
-
- > I think this is a great extension that will enable the Digital Experience team to implement a Slippers `svg` icon library in the repo and utilize it efficiently in our templates.
- >
- > WDYT @brandon_lyon @tywilliams",1
-87465293,2021-05-20 21:59:51.919,Create FID/CLS charts in Sisense,"Create FID and CLS PIs in handbook
-
-### Grafana dashboard
-https://dashboards.gitlab.net/d/000000043/sitespeed-page-summary?orgId=1&from=now-7d&to=now&var-base=sitespeed_io&var-path=desktop&var-group=gitlab_com&var-page=_explore&var-browser=chrome&var-connectivity=cable&var-function=median
-
-### Sisense dashboard
-* CLS: https://app.periscopedata.com/app/gitlab/888743/Cumulative-Layout-Shift-(CLS)-at-P90
-* FID: https://app.periscopedata.com/app/gitlab/888749/First-Input-Delay-(FID)-at-P90",3
-87420740,2021-05-20 09:29:45.091,Section missing on https://about.gitlab.com/install/ce-or-ee/,"This template is for filing a bug report related to the logged out marketing website https://about.gitlab.com/ and company handbook https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/
-
-This is not the correct repository for requests related to docs.gitlab.com, the GitLab product, or other items.
-
-#### What is/are the relevant URL(s)
-
-https://about.gitlab.com/install/ce-or-ee/
-
-#### Briefly describe the bug
-
-Example: A link is broken and when hovering over it the color is the wrong color and poorly aligned.
-
-It says: ""...you have additional advantages:"" and then there is no content regarding these.
-
-#### If possible, please specify how to reproduce the bug
-
-visit https://about.gitlab.com/install/ce-or-ee/
-
-#### Please provide any relevant screenshots or screencasts
-
-How to take a screenshot: https://www.howtogeek.com/205375/how-to-take-screenshots-on-almost-any-device/
-
-
-
-#### What is your window size, browser, operating system, and versions
-
-Please use the following website to determine your browser specifications and provide a link developers can follow:
-
-What is my browser https://www.whatsmybrowser.org
-
-https://www.whatsmybrowser.org/b/VNDHV
-
-#### What computing device are you using?
-
-Please list the brand and model (Example: Samsung Galaxy S 10 Plus)
-
-MacBook
-
-### What type of input are you attempting to use?
-
-Webpage interactivity is often tied to a specific device event.
-
-- [ ] Touchscreen
-- [ ] Touchpad
-- [ ] Mouse click
-- [ ] Mouse click and drag
-- [ ] Scrollwheel
-- [ ] Keyboard
-- [ ] Stylus
-- [ ] Other (please specify)
-
-#### Have you tried a fresh incognito window? Could this be related to cookies or account type/state?
-
-- [X] I tried a fresh incognito window & it had no impact.
-- [ ] The problem goes away when using an incognito window.
-- [ ] The problem only happens when certain cookies are set to a specific value (please specify below).
-
-#### Please list any browser plugins you have enabled
-
-Why do we ask for this? Certain website bugs may be caused by plugins. For example: Adblock, noscript, ghostery, safe browsing.
-
-no blockers
-
-#### Are you blocking javascript or any other resources?
-
-Javascript is needed for certain website functionality.
-
-- [ ] I AM blocking javascript or other resources.
-- [X] I am NOT blocking javascript or other resources.
-
-#### What is your geographic location
-
-Why do we ask for this? Certain bugs may be geographically related. For example, if you're in the European Union, it could be related to GDPR policy and cookies.
-
-Germany
-
-#### What type of network are you connected to?
-
-**Type**
-
-- [ ] Wired
-- [X] Wifi
-- [ ] Cellular (4G, 5G, etc)
-- [ ] Satellite
-- [ ] Other
-
-`Insert details here if applicable`
-
-**Location**
-
-- [X] Home
-- [ ] Workplace
-- [ ] Travel facility (hotel, airport, conference center, etc)
-- [ ] Public venue (restaurant, library, cafe, etc)
-- [ ] VPN
-- [ ] Other
-
-`Insert details here if applicable`
-
-**Hardware**
-
-- [ ] I am behind a network security appliance such as a firewall
-- [ ] I am using a pi-hole or other hardware-based traffic blocker
-- [ ] Other
-
-`Insert details here if applicable`
-
-
-/cc @gl-website
-
-",1
-87359152,2021-05-19 12:27:43.839,Pricing page should mention that CC is required for CI minutes,"#### What is/are the relevant URL(s)
-
-- https://about.gitlab.com/pricing/
-
-#### Briefly describe the bug
-
-I am seeing this page and we say `No credit card required`. While that is true, according to https://about.gitlab.com/blog/2021/05/17/prevent-crypto-mining-abuse/ new *free* accounts require a CC before utilizing CI. So I was wondering whether we should call this out, e.g.
-
-#### If possible, please specify how to reproduce the bug
-
-Go to the page.
-
-#### Please provide any relevant screenshots or screencasts
-
-
-
-#### EXPECTATION
-
-I would expect that e.g.
-
-> Get 400 CI/CD minutes per month
-
-is changed to
-
-> Get 400 CI/CD minutes per month¹
-
-where `¹` is linked to the FAQ section (https://about.gitlab.com/pricing#faq) and we add something to the Pipelines Section like:
-
-> Why do I need to enter Credit Card details for free pipeline minutes?
-
-> In order to combat crypto yada-yada link to blogpost: https://about.gitlab.com/blog/2021/05/17/prevent-crypto-mining-abuse/
-
-#### What is your window size, browser, operating system, and versions
-
-N/A
-
-#### What computing device are you using?
-
-N/A
-
-### What type of input are you attempting to use?
-
-N/A
-
-#### Have you tried a fresh incognito window? Could this be related to cookies or account type/state?
-
-N/A
-
-#### Please list any browser plugins you have enabled
-
-N/A
-
-#### Are you blocking javascript or any other resources?
-
-N/A
-
-#### What is your geographic location
-
-N/A
-
-#### What type of network are you connected to?
-
-N/A
-
-**Hardware**
-
-N/A
-
-
-/cc @gl-website
-
-",1
-87308655,2021-05-18 20:03:35.666,Create prioritization methodology for eng metric issues,"## Background
-We need to create a way to denote priority to compare important of eng metrics issues:",1
-87048248,2021-05-13 18:42:13.226,Create promotion rate PI for all department,"Current promotion rate charts are on this dashboard: https://app.periscopedata.com/app/gitlab/756370/Promotion_Rate
-
-We want to push this to all departments at the PI level.
-
-
-## Reviews
-- [ ] Review Completed for `Engineering Division` https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/security/www-gitlab-com/-/merge_requests/54
-- [ ] Review Completed for ~""Customer Support Department""
-- [ ] Review Completed for ~""Development Department""
-- [ ] Review Completed for ~""Infrastructure Department""
-- [ ] Review Completed for ~""Quality Department""
-- [ ] Review Completed for ~""UX Department""
-- [ ] Review Completed for ~""Security Department""",5
-86892277,2021-05-11 20:21:22.886,Update the HB install script to first detect if the working directory is a git directory,"
-
-#### Briefly describe the update
-The handbook install script tries to establish whereabouts on your system the `www-gitlab-com` repo is located. We should first check the working directory to see if it's a git repo and use it if that's the case. Suggested by @cwoolley-gitlab [here](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-com/www-gitlab-com/-/merge_requests/81524#note_570269519)
-
-
-
-
-",2
-86816489,2021-05-10 23:41:40.914,Update Analyst Research page,## Relates to https://gitlab.com/gitlab-com/marketing/strategic-marketing/product-marketing/-/issues/5040,1
-86428508,2021-05-04 07:02:03.622,"Follow-up from ""Add 2021 DecSecOps Survey page""","The following discussion from !81287 should be addressed:
-
-- [ ] @jgarc started a [discussion](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-com/www-gitlab-com/-/merge_requests/81287#note_566610206): (+1 comment)
-
- > Need to follow up on fixing past developer-survey assets for 2020!",1
-86410391,2021-05-03 21:11:35.190,Homepage banner swap: DevSecOps Survey 2021 Results,## Relates to https://gitlab.com/gitlab-com/marketing/inbound-marketing/growth/-/issues/1264,1
-86405560,2021-05-03 18:50:40.060,Blog post: TanukiStan: Using machine learning for GitLab Issue Triaging (Sept 13),"
-
-## Triage (REQUIRED)
-
-The Inbound Marketing team prioritizes requests that drive results and meet our [goals of generating organic traffic and inquiries](https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/marketing/inbound-marketing/#goals).
-
-Please note that there is a different process for when you want to announce something via the blog. Please see [announcement requests](https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/marketing/corporate-marketing/#requests-for-announcements) in the handbook and open an announcement request issue instead of a blog post issue.
-
-Generally speaking, engineering blog posts that are tutorials/how-tos or which share how we built or debugged something, are popular with our audience. **If your proposed blog post is aligned with our [Attributes of a successful blog post guidelines](https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/marketing/blog/#attributes-of-a-successful-blog-post), you can skip straight to your [proposal](#proposal).**
-
-If you are pitching something outside of those guidelines, please fill in the below to help us prioritize. You can check out [examples of high- and low-performing blog posts to help with your rationale](https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/marketing/inbound-marketing/content/editorial-team/#top-performing-blog-posts).
-
-**This issue fulfills one of these goals:**
-- [ ] Drive traffic to our website
-- [ ] Convert traffic into leads
-- [ ] Thought leadership/share expertise
-- [ ] Build relationships with potential customers
-- [ ] Drive long-term results (please explain below in your proposal)
-- [ ] Announcement
- - `Link to announcement request issue (required, see https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/marketing/corporate-marketing/#requests-for-announcements)`
-- [ ] Cross-functional support
- - `Link to OKR (required if this box is checked)`
-
-## Proposal
-
-@stanhu is giving a talk on ""TanukiStan: Using machine learning for GitLab Issue Triaging"" which will be turned into a blog post.
-
-Slides: https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/16Y6GTOY_AffD8vEbE4jkbQw_0s1hC5RbRM-PbuKBAWk/edit
-Agenda: https://docs.google.com/document/d/10xtjU7Q2mH3ifAIASnUBwW9Y7zIOfbMFWiWEvMeldVE/edit#
-
-Would be great if the talk is recorded so we can embed a video in this technical blog post.
-
-## Roles and Responsibilities
-| Person | Role |
-| ------ | ------ |
-| `@person` | requestor |
-| `@skassabian`| editor |
-| `@person` | approver (optional) |
-
-### Checklist
-
-- [x] If you have a specific publish date in mind (please allow 3 weeks' lead time)
- - [x] Include it in the issue title and apply the appropriate marketing milestone (e.g. `Mktg: 2021-03-28`)
- - [x] Give the issue a due date of a minimum of 2 working days prior
- - [x] If your post is likely to be >2,000 words, give a due date of a minimum of 4 working days prior
-- [ ] If [time sensitive](https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/marketing/blog/#process-for-time-sensitive-posts)
- - [ ] Add ~""Blog: Priority"" label and supplied rationale in description
-- [ ] If wide-spread customer impacting or sensitive, mention `@nwoods` to give her a heads up ASAP, apply the ~""sensitive"" label, and check the [PR handbook](https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/marketing/corporate-marketing/#requests-for-announcements) in case you need to open an announcement request instead of a blog post issue
-- [ ] If the post is about one of GitLab's Technology Partners, including integration partners, mention `@dpduncan`, apply the ~""Partner Marketing"" label, and see the [blog handbook for more on third-party posts](https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/marketing/blog/index.html#third-party-posts)
-- [ ] If the post is about one of GitLab's customers, mention `@FionaOKeeffe`, apply the ~""Customer Reference Program"" label, and see the [blog handbook for more on third-party posts](https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/marketing/blog/index.html#third-party-posts)
-- [ ] Indicate if supporting an event or campaign
-- [ ] Indicate if this post requires additional approval from internal or external parties before publishing (please provide details in a comment)
-
-## Production
-- [ ] Requestor to complete issue template (Triage, Proposal, Roles and Responsibilities, Checklist )
-- [ ] Issue sent through triage for consideration (approve, backlog, deny)
-- [ ] Issue assigned to requestor to draft blog post and open MR
-- [ ] MR created and linked to issue - issue is now deprecated in favor of MR and will close once MR is complete",4
-86405048,2021-05-03 18:35:35.945,Optional DRI Attribute to PIs,"In Infra, we have unofficially had DRIs for specific sections of metrics for awhile.
-
-As an example, I would handle cost metrics, Director of infra, reliability handles incident related metrics, and senior manager, delivery & scalability would handle MTTP and other metrics around deployments/scaling.
-Ultimately the metrics still have department head as DRI for the page overall in case someone is out or update missed.
-
-I think this has worked out pretty well for us, and we were talking about making this kind of delegation of PIs official in the page and document what that DRI would be responsible for.
-
-This change would be:
-- adding DRI attribute to PI pages
-- handbook documentation on what denoted DRI, department head, CTO (or applicable position above department heads), and analysts are responsible for in relation to the PI pages
-
-Idea of documented division of responsibility would break down into:
-- listed DRI would be responsible for updating health & health reasons of KPI before each key meeting and answering any related questions in the meeting as well. These DRIs would typically be Directors or Managers who are closest to the metrics if they are delegated this responsibility by their department head.
-- Analysts are responsible for maintaining shared PIs charts in Sisense across departments (Inherited PIs) and supporting DRIs with creation of their department specific PI charts in Sisense.
-- Department heads are responsible for their PI page overall, so covering for any PIs without delegated DRI and in case someone is out.
-- CTO is responsible for defining the division level PIs that are shared across departments and working with department heads on setting targets for these
-
-https://gitlab.com/gitlab-com/www-gitlab-com/-/merge_requests/85436
-
-cc @meks @lmai1",5
-91114493,2021-04-30 21:35:24.684,Change Request: Support Department MR Rate,"
-
-#### What is the original Periscope dashboard/link?
-
-https://app.periscopedata.com/shared/fc54cf54-e5f9-4708-9dfe-9e4c921ac79e?
-
-#### Please link to where this (or these) performance indicator/s are defined in the handbook.
-
-https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/support/performance-indicators/#support-department-mr-rate
-
-#### What are your requested changes?
-
-Two changes:
-
-1. Target is defined at 5 MRs per month, but target line shows at 10. Should be corrected.
-1. (Like to have, not required) Add a table that would show in dashboard (but not in handbook embed) of number of MRs by Gitlab username. Sorted descending by total MRs.
-
-#### What is the business question you are trying to answer?
-
-For change 2, which ICs may need help to complete contributions?
-
-#### What is the impact of this question and how will it help the company?
-
-Identification of individuals who may need additional assistance would encourage them to contribute and increase results in KPI.
-
-#### What time frames are crucial here?
-
-Should be total for entire time frame (year) of dashboard. ICs who make even a small number of contributions in a year likely do not need additional help.
-
-#### What is the visualization you are trying to create?
-
-Include any links or screenshots, if appropriate. As a rule of the thumb, the analytics team uses 12 visualization types. They are:
-
-1. Simple Text
-
-| GitLab username | Total number of MRs |
-| ------ | ------ |
-| cynthia | 5 |
-| jcolyer | 2 |
-
-#### What is the source of data behind the visualization?
-
-GitLab. Hopefully the same source as already used in the dashboard.
-
-#### What interactions/drill downs are required?
-
-No filters required.
-
-#### Any caveats or details that may be helpful?",1
-86148038,2021-04-28 14:05:48.294,Blog: Security Culture Committee (May 7),"
-
-## Triage (REQUIRED)
-
-The Inbound Marketing team prioritizes requests that drive results and meet our [goals of generating organic traffic and inquiries](https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/marketing/inbound-marketing/#goals).
-
-Please note that there is a different process for when you want to announce something via the blog. Please see [announcement requests](https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/marketing/corporate-marketing/#requests-for-announcements) in the handbook and open an announcement request issue instead of a blog post issue.
-
-Generally speaking, engineering blog posts that are tutorials/how-tos or which share how we built or debugged something, are popular with our audience. **If your proposed blog post is aligned with our [Attributes of a successful blog post guidelines](https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/marketing/blog/#attributes-of-a-successful-blog-post), you can skip straight to your [proposal](#proposal).**
-
-If you are pitching something outside of those guidelines, please fill in the below to help us prioritize. You can check out [examples of high- and low-performing blog posts to help with your rationale](https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/marketing/inbound-marketing/content/editorial-team/#top-performing-blog-posts).
-
-**This issue fulfills one of these goals:**
-- [ ] Drive traffic to our website
-- [ ] Convert traffic into leads
-- [X] Thought leadership/share expertise
-- [ ] Build relationships with potential customers
-- [ ] Drive long-term results (please explain below in your proposal)
-- [ ] Announcement
- - `Link to announcement request issue (required, see https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/marketing/corporate-marketing/#requests-for-announcements)`
-- [ ] Cross-functional support
- - `Link to OKR (required if this box is checked)`
-
-## Proposal
-
-This blog describes the creation of a Security Culture committee, why its needed, what the committee focuses on, etc. Related issue with draft: https://gitlab.com/gitlab-com/gl-security/security-communications/communications/-/issues/322
-
-## Roles and Responsibilities
-| Person | Role |
-| ------ | ------ |
-| `@heather` | requestor |
-| `@person`| editor |
-| `@person` | approver (optional) |
-
-### Checklist
-
-- [x] If you have a specific publish date in mind (please allow 3 weeks' lead time)
- - [x] Include it in the issue title and apply the appropriate marketing milestone (e.g. `Mktg: 2021-03-28`)
- - [ ] Give the issue a due date of a minimum of 2 working days prior
- - [ ] If your post is likely to be >2,000 words, give a due date of a minimum of 4 working days prior
-- [ ] If [time sensitive](https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/marketing/blog/#process-for-time-sensitive-posts)
- - [ ] Add ~""Blog: Priority"" label and supplied rationale in description
-- [ ] If wide-spread customer impacting or sensitive, mention `@nwoods` to give her a heads up ASAP, apply the ~""sensitive"" label, and check the [PR handbook](https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/marketing/corporate-marketing/#requests-for-announcements) in case you need to open an announcement request instead of a blog post issue
-- [ ] If the post is about one of GitLab's Technology Partners, including integration partners, mention `@dpduncan`, apply the ~""Partner Marketing"" label, and see the [blog handbook for more on third-party posts](https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/marketing/blog/index.html#third-party-posts)
-- [ ] If the post is about one of GitLab's customers, mention `@FionaOKeeffe`, apply the ~""Customer Reference Program"" label, and see the [blog handbook for more on third-party posts](https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/marketing/blog/index.html#third-party-posts)
-- [ ] Indicate if supporting an event or campaign
-- [ ] Indicate if this post requires additional approval from internal or external parties before publishing (please provide details in a comment)
-
-## Production
-- [ ] Requestor to complete issue template (Triage, Proposal, Roles and Responsibilities, Checklist )
-- [ ] Issue sent through triage for consideration (approve, backlog, deny)
-- [ ] Issue assigned to requestor to draft blog post and open MR
-- [ ] MR created and linked to issue - issue is now deprecated in favor of MR and will close once MR is complete",2
-86075643,2021-04-27 20:12:33.573,Blog post: Scaling our hands-on lab infrastructure for self-paced training (Publish date TBD),"
-
-## Triage (REQUIRED)
-
-**If your proposed blog post is aligned with our [Attributes of a successful blog post guidelines](https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/marketing/blog/#attributes-of-a-successful-blog-post), you can skip straight to your [proposal](#proposal).**
-
-## Proposal
-
-
-
-```
-description:
-
-We want to share the behind the scenes story of how we are scaling our Demo Systems hands-on lab infrastructure from 500 to 5,000+ users as we live our values of collaboration, iteration, results and transparency, even when it’s hard.
-```
-
-```
-introduction:
-
-Last week we posted a [blog article](https://about.gitlab.com/blog/2021/04/20/everyone-can-get-certified/) about our new self-paced GitLab certification program with hands-on labs that included a 100% discount code.
-
-The Professional Services team was excited to release this offering and from a hands-on lab infrastructure capacity, it was considered to be just another addition to our growing list of self-paced training offerings with hands-on labs that haven’t had any capacity challenges in the past. What we didn't anticipate is the interest that this would generate when it was published on our blog and shared virally on social media. As it turns out, when you offer something for free to our 30,000,000+ users, there is certainly going to be some interest!
-
-I want to share the behind the scenes story of how we are scaling our Demo Systems hands-on labs infrastructure from 500 to 5,000+ users, and some of the business and technical challenges that we’ve had to overcome in the last week. At GitLab, we try to live our values of collaboration, iteration, results, and transparency, even when it’s hard. We’re not perfect, however here is the story of what happened and how we’re iterating to make things better for everyone.
-```
-
-Full blog post draft with comment rights. Editor can request rights to edit.
-https://docs.google.com/document/d/1UyDne_HPQ2Ki4cefpt21UBRrfr3vEY0-ogmNvBb5nDU/edit?usp=sharing
-
-## Roles and Responsibilities
-
-| Person | Role |
-| ------ | ------ |
-| @jeffersonmartin | requestor & author |
-| @skassabian | editor |
-| @c.yoshida | approver |
-| @dsakamoto | approver |
-
-### Checklist
-
-- [ ] If you have a specific publish date in mind (please allow 3 weeks' lead time)
- - [ ] Include it in the issue title and apply the appropriate marketing milestone (e.g. `Mktg: 2021-03-28`)
- - [ ] Give the issue a due date of a minimum of 2 working days prior
- - [ ] If your post is likely to be >2,000 words, give a due date of a minimum of 4 working days prior
-- [ ] If [time sensitive](https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/marketing/blog/#process-for-time-sensitive-posts)
- - [X] Add ~""Blog: Priority"" label and supplied rationale in description
-- [ ] If wide-spread customer impacting or sensitive, mention `@nwoods` to give her a heads up ASAP, apply the ~""sensitive"" label, and check the [PR handbook](https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/marketing/corporate-marketing/#requests-for-announcements) in case you need to open an announcement request instead of a blog post issue
-- ~~If the post is about one of GitLab's Technology Partners, including integration partners, mention `@dpduncan`, apply the ~""Partner Marketing"" label, and see the [blog handbook for more on third-party posts](https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/marketing/blog/index.html#third-party-posts)~~
-- ~~If the post is about one of GitLab's customers, mention `@FionaOKeeffe`, apply the ~""Customer Reference Program"" label, and see the [blog handbook for more on third-party posts](https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/marketing/blog/index.html#third-party-posts)~~
-- [x] Indicate if supporting an event or campaign
-- [ ] Indicate if this post requires additional approval from internal or external parties before publishing (please provide details in a comment)
-
-## Production
-- [ ] Requestor to complete issue template (Triage, Proposal, Roles and Responsibilities, Checklist )
-- [ ] Issue sent through triage for consideration (approve, backlog, deny)
-- [ ] Issue assigned to requestor to draft blog post and open MR
-- [ ] MR created and linked to issue - issue is now deprecated in favor of MR and will close once MR is complete",4
-86030461,2021-04-27 11:44:48.729,Blog post: integrate Jira with GL (3 of 3) - 5/30,Draft of post by Tye: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1aEnXv1liw3AIZMESyjrPgncdBUhcWPzOfN2sEC-3xko/edit,1
-85837907,2021-04-23 17:10:58.595,Blog Post: Co-writing Gitlab and Scaleway blog cross promotion (June 9),"
-
-## Triage (REQUIRED)
-
-The Inbound Marketing team prioritizes requests that drive results and meet our [goals of generating organic traffic and inquiries](https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/marketing/inbound-marketing/#goals).
-
-Please note that there is a different process for when you want to announce something via the blog. Please see [announcement requests](https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/marketing/corporate-marketing/#requests-for-announcements) in the handbook and open an announcement request issue instead of a blog post issue.
-
-Generally speaking, engineering blog posts that are tutorials/how-tos or which share how we built or debugged something, are popular with our audience. **If your proposed blog post is aligned with our [Attributes of a successful blog post guidelines](https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/marketing/blog/#attributes-of-a-successful-blog-post), you can skip straight to your [proposal](#proposal).**
-
-If you are pitching something outside of those guidelines, please fill in the below to help us prioritize. You can check out [examples of high- and low-performing blog posts to help with your rationale](https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/marketing/inbound-marketing/content/editorial-team/#top-performing-blog-posts).
-
-**This issue fulfills one of these goals:**
-- [X] Drive traffic to our website
-- [ ] Convert traffic into leads
-- [ ] Thought leadership/share expertise
-- [ ] Build relationships with potential customers
-- [ ] Drive long-term results (please explain below in your proposal)
-- [ ] Announcement
- - `Link to announcement request issue (required, see https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/marketing/corporate-marketing/#requests-for-announcements)`
-- [ ] Cross-functional support
- - `Link to OKR (required if this box is checked)`
-
-## Proposal
-
-Scaleway has co-written a [blog post](https://gitlab.com/brollik/scaleway/-/blob/master/2021-03-18-tuto-mac-m1-gitlab-ci.md) that they are publishing on their website and they would like to have us cross-promote and publish on our end as well. We opened [this issue](https://gitlab.com/brollik/scaleway/-/issues/1) for the purpose of feedback and suggested edits. We've communicated via email mostly so I've forwarded the email chain to @bmatturro for the extra context in case that's helpful! I wasn't sure if there is a difference in process compared to our normal blog process in cases like this. Please advise if I used the wrong template or need to follow another process, thanks!
-
-## Roles and Responsibilities
-| Person | Role |
-| ------ | ------ |
-| @parker_ennis @DarrenEastman | requestor |
-| `@person`| editor |
-| `@person` | approver (optional) |
-
-### Checklist
-
-- [ ] If you have a specific publish date in mind (please allow 3 weeks' lead time)
- - [ ] Include it in the issue title and apply the appropriate marketing milestone (e.g. `Mktg: 2021-03-28`)
- - [ ] Give the issue a due date of a minimum of 2 working days prior
- - [ ] If your post is likely to be >2,000 words, give a due date of a minimum of 4 working days prior
-- [ ] If [time sensitive](https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/marketing/blog/#process-for-time-sensitive-posts)
- - [ ] Add ~""Blog: Priority"" label and supplied rationale in description
-- [ ] If wide-spread customer impacting or sensitive, mention `@nwoods` to give her a heads up ASAP, apply the ~""sensitive"" label, and check the [PR handbook](https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/marketing/corporate-marketing/#requests-for-announcements) in case you need to open an announcement request instead of a blog post issue
-- [ ] If the post is about one of GitLab's Technology Partners, including integration partners, mention `@dpduncan`, apply the ~""Partner Marketing"" label, and see the [blog handbook for more on third-party posts](https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/marketing/blog/index.html#third-party-posts)
-- [ ] If the post is about one of GitLab's customers, mention `@FionaOKeeffe`, apply the ~""Customer Reference Program"" label, and see the [blog handbook for more on third-party posts](https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/marketing/blog/index.html#third-party-posts)
-- [ ] Indicate if supporting an event or campaign
-- [X] Indicate if this post requires additional approval from internal or external parties before publishing (please provide details in a comment)
-
-
-## Production
-- [ ] Requestor to complete issue template (Triage, Proposal, Roles and Responsibilities, Checklist )
-- [ ] Issue sent through triage for consideration (approve, backlog, deny)
-- [ ] Issue assigned to requestor to draft blog post and open MR
-- [ ] MR created and linked to issue - issue is now deprecated in favor of MR and will close once MR is complete",2
-85699401,2021-04-21 22:03:09.219,Blog Post: How to use Terraform with Kubernetes (July 21 - TBD),"
-
-## Triage (REQUIRED)
-
-The Inbound Marketing team prioritizes requests that drive results and meet our [goals of generating organic traffic and inquiries](https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/marketing/inbound-marketing/#goals).
-
-Please note that there is a different process for when you want to announce something via the blog. Please see [announcement requests](https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/marketing/corporate-marketing/#requests-for-announcements) in the handbook and open an announcement request issue instead of a blog post issue.
-
-Generally speaking, engineering blog posts that are tutorials/how-tos or which share how we built or debugged something, are popular with our audience. **If your proposed blog post is aligned with our [Attributes of a successful blog post guidelines](https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/marketing/blog/#attributes-of-a-successful-blog-post), you can skip straight to your [proposal](#proposal).**
-
-If you are pitching something outside of those guidelines, please fill in the below to help us prioritize. You can check out [examples of high- and low-performing blog posts to help with your rationale](https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/marketing/inbound-marketing/content/editorial-team/#top-performing-blog-posts).
-
-**This issue fulfills one of these goals:**
-- [ ] Drive traffic to our website
-- [ ] Convert traffic into leads
-- [ ] Thought leadership/share expertise
-- [ ] Build relationships with potential customers
-- [ ] Drive long-term results (please explain below in your proposal)
-- [ ] Announcement
- - `Link to announcement request issue (required, see https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/marketing/corporate-marketing/#requests-for-announcements)`
-- [ ] Cross-functional support
- - `Link to OKR (required if this box is checked)`
-
-## Proposal
-
-Related to: https://twitter.com/kubermatic/status/1374357606412779522?s=27
-
-Our blog post about GitOps, terraform, etc. was one of the most read posts we've ever published so I know that this will be a hot topic. I'm not totally sure what the angle here is, I will leave that up to you @abuango, but I think that if we do something like ""How to use Terraform with Kubernetes and GitLab"" that could be great.
-
-## Roles and Responsibilities
-| Person | Role |
-| ------ | ------ |
-| `@person` | requestor |
-| `@person`| editor |
-| `@person` | approver (optional) |
-
-### Checklist
-
-- [ ] If you have a specific publish date in mind (please allow 3 weeks' lead time)
- - [ ] Include it in the issue title and apply the appropriate marketing milestone (e.g. `Mktg: 2021-03-28`)
- - [ ] Give the issue a due date of a minimum of 2 working days prior
- - [ ] If your post is likely to be >2,000 words, give a due date of a minimum of 4 working days prior
-- [ ] If [time sensitive](https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/marketing/blog/#process-for-time-sensitive-posts)
- - [ ] Add ~""Blog: Priority"" label and supplied rationale in description
-- [ ] If wide-spread customer impacting or sensitive, mention `@nwoods` to give her a heads up ASAP, apply the ~""sensitive"" label, and check the [PR handbook](https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/marketing/corporate-marketing/#requests-for-announcements) in case you need to open an announcement request instead of a blog post issue
-- [ ] If the post is about one of GitLab's Technology Partners, including integration partners, mention `@dpduncan`, apply the ~""Partner Marketing"" label, and see the [blog handbook for more on third-party posts](https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/marketing/blog/index.html#third-party-posts)
-- [ ] If the post is about one of GitLab's customers, mention `@FionaOKeeffe`, apply the ~""Customer Reference Program"" label, and see the [blog handbook for more on third-party posts](https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/marketing/blog/index.html#third-party-posts)
-- [ ] Indicate if supporting an event or campaign
-- [ ] Indicate if this post requires additional approval from internal or external parties before publishing (please provide details in a comment)
-
-## Production
-- [ ] Requestor to complete issue template (Triage, Proposal, Roles and Responsibilities, Checklist )
-- [ ] Issue sent through triage for consideration (approve, backlog, deny)
-- [ ] Issue assigned to requestor to draft blog post and open MR
-- [ ] MR created and linked to issue - issue is now deprecated in favor of MR and will close once MR is complete",3
-85689515,2021-04-21 18:30:19.743,Create Vacancy Time to Fill KPI,"Part of overall review of division level PIs: https://gitlab.com/gitlab-com/www-gitlab-com/-/issues/11463
-
-If we are keeping PI at department level, tasks involved with review are:
-
-- if chart update is needed, agree on what format going forward will be
-- changing formatting to match standards in Sisense charts
-- check target matches in handbook and sisense
-- make sure handbook definition and other details are updated and link to parent is not broken
-
-## Reviews
-- [x] Review Completed for `Engineering Division`
- - https://gitlab.com/gitlab-com/www-gitlab-com/-/merge_requests/84142
-- [x] Review Completed for ~""Customer Support Department""
- - https://gitlab.com/gitlab-com/www-gitlab-com/-/merge_requests/84127
-- [x] Review Completed for ~""Development Department""
- - https://gitlab.com/gitlab-com/www-gitlab-com/-/merge_requests/84129
-- [x] Review Completed for ~""Infrastructure Department""
- - https://gitlab.com/gitlab-com/www-gitlab-com/-/merge_requests/83163
-- [x] Review Completed for ~""Quality Department""
- - https://gitlab.com/gitlab-com/www-gitlab-com/-/merge_requests/84131
-- [x] Review Completed for ~""Security Department""
- - https://gitlab.com/gitlab-com/www-gitlab-com/-/merge_requests/84134
-- [x] Review Completed for ~""UX Department""
- - https://gitlab.com/gitlab-com/www-gitlab-com/-/merge_requests/84133",3
-85640226,2021-04-21 12:07:53.129,Blog post: Loading large requests on the frontend in increasingly larger batches,"
-
-### Proposal
-
-
-
-#### Potential Titles
-
-* Loading large requests on the frontend in increasingly larger batches
-* Loading increasingly large batches to render large MRs faster
-* Batch Diff loading with increasing payloads
-* Incrementally loading large merge request diffs in batches
-* ....
-
-#### Goal
-
-Go over the journey of shipping batch diffs and tweaking them for better performance in large Merge Requests
-
-#### Outline
-
-* Establish the previously shipped batch diffs. Pain points of lots of requests/iterations for large MRs
-* Slow start of TCP/IP
-* Actual implementation with minimum (1st request fast), growing up to a point (beware of BE load)
-* Results
-* Future work: parallelisation. (problem: how to handle order?)",2
-85488100,2021-04-19 18:36:02.625,Blog Post Pitch: What is the GitLab package?,"
-
-## Triage (REQUIRED)
-
-The Inbound Marketing team prioritizes requests that drive results and meet our [goals of generating organic traffic and inquiries](https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/marketing/inbound-marketing/#goals).
-
-Please note that there is a different process for when you want to announce something via the blog. Please see [announcement requests](https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/marketing/corporate-marketing/#requests-for-announcements) in the handbook and open an announcement request issue instead of a blog post issue.
-
-Generally speaking, engineering blog posts that are tutorials/how-tos or which share how we built or debugged something, are popular with our audience. **If your proposed blog post is aligned with our [Attributes of a successful blog post guidelines](https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/marketing/blog/#attributes-of-a-successful-blog-post), you can skip straight to your [proposal](#proposal).**
-
-If you are pitching something outside of those guidelines, please fill in the below to help us prioritize. You can check out [examples of high- and low-performing blog posts to help with your rationale](https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/marketing/inbound-marketing/content/editorial-team/#top-performing-blog-posts).
-
-**This issue fulfills one of these goals:**
-- [X] Drive traffic to our website
-- [ ] Convert traffic into leads
-- [ ] Thought leadership/share expertise
-- [X] Build relationships with potential customers
-- [ ] Drive long-term results (please explain below in your proposal)
-- [ ] Announcement
- - `Link to announcement request issue (required, see https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/marketing/corporate-marketing/#requests-for-announcements)`
-- [ ] Cross-functional support
- - `Link to OKR (required if this box is checked)`
-
-## Proposal
-
-
-
-## Roles and Responsibilities
-| Person | Role |
-| ------ | ------ |
-| `@person` | requestor |
-| `@person`| editor |
-| `@person` | approver (optional) |
-
-### Checklist
-
-- [ ] If you have a specific publish date in mind (please allow 3 weeks' lead time)
- - [ ] Include it in the issue title and apply the appropriate marketing milestone (e.g. `Mktg: 2021-03-28`)
- - [ ] Give the issue a due date of a minimum of 2 working days prior
- - [ ] If your post is likely to be >2,000 words, give a due date of a minimum of 4 working days prior
-- [ ] If [time sensitive](https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/marketing/blog/#process-for-time-sensitive-posts)
- - [ ] Add ~""Blog: Priority"" label and supplied rationale in description
-- [ ] If wide-spread customer impacting or sensitive, mention `@nwoods` to give her a heads up ASAP, apply the ~""sensitive"" label, and check the [PR handbook](https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/marketing/corporate-marketing/#requests-for-announcements) in case you need to open an announcement request instead of a blog post issue
-- [ ] If the post is about one of GitLab's Technology Partners, including integration partners, mention `@dpduncan`, apply the ~""Partner Marketing"" label, and see the [blog handbook for more on third-party posts](https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/marketing/blog/index.html#third-party-posts)
-- [ ] If the post is about one of GitLab's customers, mention `@FionaOKeeffe`, apply the ~""Customer Reference Program"" label, and see the [blog handbook for more on third-party posts](https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/marketing/blog/index.html#third-party-posts)
-- [ ] Indicate if supporting an event or campaign
-- [ ] Indicate if this post requires additional approval from internal or external parties before publishing (please provide details in a comment)
-
-## Production
-- [ ] Requestor to complete issue template (Triage, Proposal, Roles and Responsibilities, Checklist )
-- [ ] Issue sent through triage for consideration (approve, backlog, deny)
-- [ ] Issue assigned to requestor to draft blog post and open MR
-- [ ] MR created and linked to issue - issue is now deprecated in favor of MR and will close once MR is complete",3
-85110285,2021-04-13 11:56:59.154,Blog post: Git workflows with Visual Studio Code (May 19),"
-
-## Triage (REQUIRED)
-
-The Inbound Marketing team prioritizes requests that drive results and meet our [goals of generating organic traffic and inquiries](https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/marketing/inbound-marketing/#goals).
-
-Please note that there is a different process for when you want to announce something via the blog. Please see [announcement requests](https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/marketing/corporate-marketing/#requests-for-announcements) in the handbook and open an announcement request issue instead of a blog post issue.
-
-Generally speaking, engineering blog posts that are tutorials/how-tos or which share how we built or debugged something, are popular with our audience. **If your proposed blog post is aligned with our [Attributes of a successful blog post guidelines](https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/marketing/blog/#attributes-of-a-successful-blog-post), you can skip straight to your [proposal](#proposal).**
-
-If you are pitching something outside of those guidelines, please fill in the below to help us prioritize. You can check out [examples of high- and low-performing blog posts to help with your rationale](https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/marketing/inbound-marketing/content/editorial-team/#top-performing-blog-posts).
-
-**This issue fulfills one of these goals:**
-- [ ] Drive traffic to our website
-- [ ] Convert traffic into leads
-- [ ] Thought leadership/share expertise
-- [ ] Build relationships with potential customers
-- [ ] Drive long-term results (please explain below in your proposal)
-- [ ] Announcement
- - `Link to announcement request issue (required, see https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/marketing/corporate-marketing/#requests-for-announcements)`
-- [ ] Cross-functional support
- - `Link to OKR (required if this box is checked)`
-
-## Proposal
-
-
-
-Visual Studio Code & the GitLab workflow extension are a great help. The idea is to provide a story line from the first code & git init/add to a fully fledged workflow with merges, publishing, etc. - similar to the [quick actions story line](https://about.gitlab.com/blog/2021/02/18/improve-your-gitlab-productivity-with-these-10-tips/).
-
-Existing SCM/Git integration & optional CLI access for fast resolving e.g. merge conflicts could also be interesting (https://code.visualstudio.com/docs/editor/versioncontrol). Or a best practice extension which makes daily live easier?
-
-Existing blog posts:
-
-- https://about.gitlab.com/blog/2018/03/01/gitlab-vscode-extension/
-- https://about.gitlab.com/blog/2020/07/31/use-gitlab-with-vscode/
-- https://about.gitlab.com/blog/2020/11/30/vscode-extension-development-with-gitlab/
-- https://about.gitlab.com/blog/2021/01/25/mr-reviews-with-vs-code/
-
-This is a follow-up idea from https://gitlab.com/gitlab-com/www-gitlab-com/-/issues/2874#note_549700745 - currently not planning on writing this myself.
-
-cc @skassabian
-
-## Roles and Responsibilities
-| Person | Role |
-| ------ | ------ |
-| `@person` | requestor |
-| `@person`| editor |
-| `@person` | approver (optional) |
-
-### Checklist
-
-- [x] If you have a specific publish date in mind (please allow 3 weeks' lead time)
- - [x] Include it in the issue title and apply the appropriate marketing milestone (e.g. `Mktg: 2021-03-28`)
- - [ ] Give the issue a due date of a minimum of 2 working days prior
- - [ ] If your post is likely to be >2,000 words, give a due date of a minimum of 4 working days prior
-- [ ] If [time sensitive](https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/marketing/blog/#process-for-time-sensitive-posts)
- - [ ] Add ~""Blog: Priority"" label and supplied rationale in description
-- [ ] If wide-spread customer impacting or sensitive, mention `@nwoods` to give her a heads up ASAP, apply the ~""sensitive"" label, and check the [PR handbook](https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/marketing/corporate-marketing/#requests-for-announcements) in case you need to open an announcement request instead of a blog post issue
-- [ ] If the post is about one of GitLab's Technology Partners, including integration partners, mention `@dpduncan`, apply the ~""Partner Marketing"" label, and see the [blog handbook for more on third-party posts](https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/marketing/blog/index.html#third-party-posts)
-- [ ] If the post is about one of GitLab's customers, mention `@FionaOKeeffe`, apply the ~""Customer Reference Program"" label, and see the [blog handbook for more on third-party posts](https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/marketing/blog/index.html#third-party-posts)
-- [ ] Indicate if supporting an event or campaign
-- [ ] Indicate if this post requires additional approval from internal or external parties before publishing (please provide details in a comment)
-
-## Production
-- [ ] Requestor to complete issue template (Triage, Proposal, Roles and Responsibilities, Checklist )
-- [ ] Issue sent through triage for consideration (approve, backlog, deny)
-- [ ] Issue assigned to requestor to draft blog post and open MR
-- [ ] MR created and linked to issue - issue is now deprecated in favor of MR and will close once MR is complete",3
-85077576,2021-04-12 23:20:02.112,Partner Blog Post: Getting GitOps right with IaC Security [To be published before or during GitOps Sales Play],"
-
-## Triage (REQUIRED)
-
-The Inbound Marketing team prioritizes requests that drive results and meet our [goals of generating organic traffic and inquiries](https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/marketing/inbound-marketing/#goals).
-
-Please note that there is a different process for when you want to announce something via the blog. Please see [announcement requests](https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/marketing/corporate-marketing/#requests-for-announcements) in the handbook and open an announcement request issue instead of a blog post issue.
-
-Generally speaking, engineering blog posts that are tutorials/how-tos or which share how we built or debugged something, are popular with our audience. **If your proposed blog post is aligned with our [Attributes of a successful blog post guidelines](https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/marketing/blog/#attributes-of-a-successful-blog-post), you can skip straight to your [proposal](#proposal).**
-
-If you are pitching something outside of those guidelines, please fill in the below to help us prioritize. You can check out [examples of high- and low-performing blog posts to help with your rationale](https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/marketing/inbound-marketing/content/editorial-team/#top-performing-blog-posts).
-
-**This issue fulfills one of these goals:**
-- [x] Drive traffic to our website
-- [ ] Convert traffic into leads
-- [x] Thought leadership/share expertise
-- [x] Build relationships with potential customers
-- [ ] Drive long-term results (please explain below in your proposal)
-- [ ] Announcement
- - `Link to announcement request issue (required, see https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/marketing/corporate-marketing/#requests-for-announcements)`
-- [ ] Cross-functional support
- - `Link to OKR (required if this box is checked)`
-
-## Proposal
-
-
-
-This blog will be about GitOps best practices, how GitLab enables the automation of infrastructure as code and how our technology partner, Indeni, helps to secure IaC. The blog post is entitled:[Getting GitOps right with IaC Security](https://docs.google.com/document/d/11knV2J0fRKQa49TYXLx8TgVss1TuOUCa9e2CzgX5EBY/edit?ts=6046bbc9#heading=h.yhp0ki8yozp). @cblake and @stkerr on our Secure team have already provided input and feedback to Indeni on this blog post.
-
-This blog post ties into one of our overarching sales plays - GitOps. We would like to release the blog prior to or in coordination with the GitOps GTM sales play.
-
-cc: @dpduncan
-
-## Roles and Responsibilities
-| Person | Role |
-| ------ | ------ |
-| `@mlebeau` | Mike LeBeau - Technology Partner Manager (Alliances) |
-| `@person`| editor |
-| `@person` | approver (optional) |
-
-### Checklist
-
-- [ ] If you have a specific publish date in mind (please allow 3 weeks' lead time)
- - [ ] Include it in the issue title and apply the appropriate marketing milestone (e.g. `Mktg: 2021-03-28`)
- - [ ] Give the issue a due date of a minimum of 2 working days prior
- - [ ] If your post is likely to be >2,000 words, give a due date of a minimum of 4 working days prior
-- [ ] If [time sensitive](https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/marketing/blog/#process-for-time-sensitive-posts)
- - [ ] Add ~""Blog: Priority"" label and supplied rationale in description
-- [ ] If wide-spread customer impacting or sensitive, mention `@nwoods` to give her a heads up ASAP, apply the ~""sensitive"" label, and check the [PR handbook](https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/marketing/corporate-marketing/#requests-for-announcements) in case you need to open an announcement request instead of a blog post issue
-- [x] If the post is about one of GitLab's Technology Partners, including integration partners, mention `@dpduncan`, apply the ~""Partner Marketing"" label, and see the [blog handbook for more on third-party posts](https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/marketing/blog/index.html#third-party-posts)
-- [ ] If the post is about one of GitLab's customers, mention `@FionaOKeeffe`, apply the ~""Customer Reference Program"" label, and see the [blog handbook for more on third-party posts](https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/marketing/blog/index.html#third-party-posts)
-- [ ] Indicate if supporting an event or campaign
-- [ ] Indicate if this post requires additional approval from internal or external parties before publishing (please provide details in a comment)
-
-## Production
-- [ ] Requestor to complete issue template (Triage, Proposal, Roles and Responsibilities, Checklist )
-- [ ] Issue sent through triage for consideration (approve, backlog, deny)
-- [ ] Issue assigned to requestor to draft blog post and open MR
-- [ ] MR created and linked to issue - issue is now deprecated in favor of MR and will close once MR is complete",2