|
group_id message_id message_type origin original_text clean_text annotation_type annotation_target annotation_additional team_performance performance_change sol_tracker_message sol_tracker_all |
|
0d908396-4045-42af-9f1c-8b06ac2c0788 -1 INITIAL SYSTEM SYSTEM,Kiwi,Ox,Bee&&5,X,E,4 0.5 0.0 {"Lobster": ["X"], "Kiwi": ["X"], "Bee": ["E"], "Giraffe": ["E", "4"], "Ox": ["E"]} |
|
0d908396-4045-42af-9f1c-8b06ac2c0788 c1c19960-fae2-4fac-899a-35b00eb5cfa0 MESSAGE Kiwi If you turn x it should be an odd number confirming If you turn <CARD> it should be an odd number confirming Non-probing-deliberation Reasoning partial_solution 0.5 0.0 X {"Lobster": ["X"], "Kiwi": ["X"], "Bee": ["E"], "Giraffe": ["E", "4"], "Ox": ["E"]} |
|
0d908396-4045-42af-9f1c-8b06ac2c0788 d1b980aa-fcb5-4d0c-bbed-13bb49167dd5 SUBMIT Ox E,4 0.45 -0.05 {"Lobster": ["X"], "Kiwi": ["X"], "Bee": ["E"], "Giraffe": ["E", "4"], "Ox": ["E", "4"]} |
|
0d908396-4045-42af-9f1c-8b06ac2c0788 39e83956-9f19-443b-8427-56d9b7f01c41 MESSAGE Bee So what does everyone think? So what does everyone think ? Probing Moderation 0 0.45 0.0 {"Lobster": ["X"], "Kiwi": ["X"], "Bee": ["E"], "Giraffe": ["E", "4"], "Ox": ["E", "4"]} |
|
0d908396-4045-42af-9f1c-8b06ac2c0788 f6c4c16e-84fb-41e8-a4ed-df6385dd23a8 MESSAGE Ox All cards with vowels on one side have an even number on the other. So we flip the 4 and the E? All cards with vowels on one side have an even number on the other . So we flip the <CARD> and the <CARD> ? Non-probing-deliberation Reasoning complete_solution 0.45 0.0 E,4 {"Lobster": ["X"], "Kiwi": ["X"], "Bee": ["E"], "Giraffe": ["E", "4"], "Ox": ["E", "4"]} |
|
0d908396-4045-42af-9f1c-8b06ac2c0788 932cb814-ee47-4620-af45-fc25b9d4d2be MESSAGE Bee My idea is that if the 4 card has a vowel on the other side, it pretty much proves the rule My idea is that if the <CARD> card has a vowel on the other side , it pretty much proves the rule Non-probing-deliberation Reasoning complete_solution 0.35 -0.1 4 {"Lobster": ["X"], "Kiwi": ["X"], "Bee": ["4"], "Giraffe": ["E", "4"], "Ox": ["E", "4"]} |
|
0d908396-4045-42af-9f1c-8b06ac2c0788 c3733a28-3d53-4d7a-bb08-76535ae17e33 SUBMIT Kiwi E,X 0.4 0.05 {"Lobster": ["X"], "Kiwi": ["E", "X"], "Bee": ["4"], "Giraffe": ["E", "4"], "Ox": ["E", "4"]} |
|
0d908396-4045-42af-9f1c-8b06ac2c0788 080c5e43-adb8-4b2d-ae9e-69b0c727625a MESSAGE Bee I think both the four and the E, yes I think both the four and the <CARD> , yes Non-probing-deliberation Solution complete_solution 0.5 0.1 E {"Lobster": ["X"], "Kiwi": ["E", "X"], "Bee": ["E"], "Giraffe": ["E", "4"], "Ox": ["E", "4"]} |
|
0d908396-4045-42af-9f1c-8b06ac2c0788 49314f04-6940-448a-af79-5dae46017f80 MESSAGE Kiwi Also turning the e will reveal a even number x and e will confirm the rule Also turning the <CARD> will reveal a even number <CARD> and <CARD> will confirm the rule Non-probing-deliberation Reasoning complete_solution 0.5 0.0 E,X {"Lobster": ["X"], "Kiwi": ["E", "X"], "Bee": ["E"], "Giraffe": ["E", "4"], "Ox": ["E", "4"]} |
|
0d908396-4045-42af-9f1c-8b06ac2c0788 dba72bd7-edef-4346-928d-7ad209094395 SUBMIT Bee E,4 0.45 -0.05 {"Lobster": ["X"], "Kiwi": ["E", "X"], "Bee": ["E", "4"], "Giraffe": ["E", "4"], "Ox": ["E", "4"]} |
|
0d908396-4045-42af-9f1c-8b06ac2c0788 e692f83c-4d45-4a6a-adfb-bdf37dde7c53 MESSAGE Bee 'That''s true too, we don''t need to do both the E and the 4 then if we do X and E' 'That''s true too , we don''t need to do both the <CARD> and the <CARD> then if we do <CARD> and <CARD>' Non-probing-deliberation Reasoning complete_solution 0.4 -0.05 E,X,4 {"Lobster": ["X"], "Kiwi": ["E", "X"], "Bee": ["E", "X", "4"], "Giraffe": ["E", "4"], "Ox": ["E", "4"]} |
|
0d908396-4045-42af-9f1c-8b06ac2c0788 83f49870-b235-4d79-997d-cc665c215dc8 MESSAGE Bee Would only one card suffice though? Would only one card suffice though ? Probing Solution 0 0.4 0.0 {"Lobster": ["X"], "Kiwi": ["E", "X"], "Bee": ["E", "X", "4"], "Giraffe": ["E", "4"], "Ox": ["E", "4"]} |
|
0d908396-4045-42af-9f1c-8b06ac2c0788 39704b59-b26d-463a-8926-6f5d00a2658e MESSAGE Ox yes one of each. X and 4? yes one of each . <CARD> and <CARD> ? Non-probing-deliberation Solution complete_solution 0.3 -0.1 X,4 {"Lobster": ["X"], "Kiwi": ["E", "X"], "Bee": ["E", "X", "4"], "Giraffe": ["E", "4"], "Ox": ["X", "4"]} |
|
0d908396-4045-42af-9f1c-8b06ac2c0788 c5bc0765-55b7-4313-b67c-b36eaa972e23 SUBMIT Ox X,4 0.3 0.0 {"Lobster": ["X"], "Kiwi": ["E", "X"], "Bee": ["E", "X", "4"], "Giraffe": ["E", "4"], "Ox": ["X", "4"]} |
|
0d908396-4045-42af-9f1c-8b06ac2c0788 f1003f1a-2d19-4231-8fee-ec2613dfbf17 MESSAGE Kiwi no need to confirm the odd and even numbers no need to confirm the odd and even numbers Non-probing-deliberation Reasoning 0 0.3 0.0 {"Lobster": ["X"], "Kiwi": ["E", "X"], "Bee": ["E", "X", "4"], "Giraffe": ["E", "4"], "Ox": ["X", "4"]} |
|
0d908396-4045-42af-9f1c-8b06ac2c0788 11dbbf4c-e809-4f98-8c0d-fe81c0473866 MESSAGE Kiwi If you turn one card it only confirms half the rule If you turn one card it only confirms half the rule Non-probing-deliberation Reasoning 0 0.3 0.0 {"Lobster": ["X"], "Kiwi": ["E", "X"], "Bee": ["E", "X", "4"], "Giraffe": ["E", "4"], "Ox": ["X", "4"]} |
|
0d908396-4045-42af-9f1c-8b06ac2c0788 ad1f3127-bfad-403f-93dc-8df401f4cc24 MESSAGE Bee 'Right, because we''re testing both and checking the flip side' 'Right , because we''re testing both and checking the flip side' Non-probing-deliberation Reasoning 0 0.3 0.0 {"Lobster": ["X"], "Kiwi": ["E", "X"], "Bee": ["E", "X", "4"], "Giraffe": ["E", "4"], "Ox": ["X", "4"]} |
|
0d908396-4045-42af-9f1c-8b06ac2c0788 d12d8ba5-ca56-4a68-b040-f35d4a7f3fad SUBMIT Bee E,X 0.35 0.05 {"Lobster": ["X"], "Kiwi": ["E", "X"], "Bee": ["E", "X"], "Giraffe": ["E", "4"], "Ox": ["X", "4"]} |
|
0d908396-4045-42af-9f1c-8b06ac2c0788 304267bd-4f19-41e8-8b99-d6fa7cdca968 MESSAGE Ox so X and 4? so <CARD> and <CARD> ? Probing Solution solution_summary 0.35 0.0 X,4 {"Lobster": ["X"], "Kiwi": ["E", "X"], "Bee": ["E", "X"], "Giraffe": ["E", "4"], "Ox": ["X", "4"]} |
|
0d908396-4045-42af-9f1c-8b06ac2c0788 d654b6c5-1404-4676-8aba-1078f72d476c MESSAGE Kiwi could be xand e or 5 and 4 both will confirm full rule could be xand <CARD> or <CARD> and <CARD> both will confirm full rule Non-probing-deliberation Reasoning 0 0.4 0.05 E,5,4 {"Lobster": ["X"], "Kiwi": ["E", "5", "4"], "Bee": ["E", "X"], "Giraffe": ["E", "4"], "Ox": ["X", "4"]} |
|
0d908396-4045-42af-9f1c-8b06ac2c0788 1793d6a2-da70-45a3-8686-8c93482410ed MESSAGE Bee Or X and E? Would be the same, right? Or <CARD> and <CARD> ? Would be the same , right ? Non-probing-deliberation Solution complete_solution 0.4 0.0 E,X {"Lobster": ["X"], "Kiwi": ["E", "5", "4"], "Bee": ["E", "X"], "Giraffe": ["E", "4"], "Ox": ["X", "4"]} |
|
0d908396-4045-42af-9f1c-8b06ac2c0788 6e54d749-4ecc-4a96-8a60-8c1975bca727 MESSAGE Bee Makes sense Makes sense Non-probing-deliberation Agree 0 0.4 0.0 {"Lobster": ["X"], "Kiwi": ["E", "5", "4"], "Bee": ["E", "X"], "Giraffe": ["E", "4"], "Ox": ["X", "4"]} |
|
0d908396-4045-42af-9f1c-8b06ac2c0788 aeea30ab-86d4-4f3f-867c-eba7d438a012 MESSAGE Kiwi yes yes Non-probing-deliberation Agree 0 0.4 0.0 {"Lobster": ["X"], "Kiwi": ["E", "5", "4"], "Bee": ["E", "X"], "Giraffe": ["E", "4"], "Ox": ["X", "4"]} |
|
0d908396-4045-42af-9f1c-8b06ac2c0788 fc631249-8f41-4deb-9841-e7178ec9881e MESSAGE Bee I chose X and E. Anyone support that? I chose <CARD> and <CARD> . Anyone support that ? Non-probing-deliberation Solution complete_solution 0.4 0.0 E,X {"Lobster": ["X"], "Kiwi": ["E", "5", "4"], "Bee": ["E", "X"], "Giraffe": ["E", "4"], "Ox": ["X", "4"]} |
|
0d908396-4045-42af-9f1c-8b06ac2c0788 c8fd58a5-d525-4899-8094-c298ade5e8c0 MESSAGE Ox yes of course. we should just pick a combo. yes of course . we should just pick a combo . Non-probing-deliberation Agree 0 0.4 0.0 {"Lobster": ["X"], "Kiwi": ["E", "5", "4"], "Bee": ["E", "X"], "Giraffe": ["E", "4"], "Ox": ["X", "4"]} |
|
0d908396-4045-42af-9f1c-8b06ac2c0788 7713ccd5-0750-489b-90a7-5438947cda17 MESSAGE Kiwi yes yes Non-probing-deliberation Agree 0 0.4 0.0 {"Lobster": ["X"], "Kiwi": ["E", "5", "4"], "Bee": ["E", "X"], "Giraffe": ["E", "4"], "Ox": ["X", "4"]} |
|
0d908396-4045-42af-9f1c-8b06ac2c0788 0fde436b-d032-484b-a885-58734581ef25 MESSAGE Ox ok X and E ok <CARD> and <CARD> Non-probing-deliberation Solution complete_solution 0.5 0.1 E,X {"Lobster": ["X"], "Kiwi": ["E", "5", "4"], "Bee": ["E", "X"], "Giraffe": ["E", "4"], "Ox": ["E", "X"]} |
|
0d908396-4045-42af-9f1c-8b06ac2c0788 0d2a6522-9476-4a1c-93da-0e4086b6ef5e SUBMIT Ox E,X 0.5 0.0 {"Lobster": ["X"], "Kiwi": ["E", "5", "4"], "Bee": ["E", "X"], "Giraffe": ["E", "4"], "Ox": ["E", "X"]} |
|
0d908396-4045-42af-9f1c-8b06ac2c0788 6f1a9cda-15eb-474a-b5a1-6ecfac0aa540 MESSAGE Bee Thanks everyone Thanks everyone None 0 0 0.5 0.0 {"Lobster": ["X"], "Kiwi": ["E", "5", "4"], "Bee": ["E", "X"], "Giraffe": ["E", "4"], "Ox": ["E", "X"]} |
|
0d908396-4045-42af-9f1c-8b06ac2c0788 171f53e0-b691-4358-a088-b0c2963f3169 MESSAGE Kiwi sounds good sounds good Non-probing-deliberation Agree 0 0.5 0.0 {"Lobster": ["X"], "Kiwi": ["E", "5", "4"], "Bee": ["E", "X"], "Giraffe": ["E", "4"], "Ox": ["E", "X"]} |
|
0d908396-4045-42af-9f1c-8b06ac2c0788 cad5ac52-65ff-4d83-aaa5-2a8d6fa13e66 MESSAGE Ox sweet sweet None 0 0 0.5 0.0 {"Lobster": ["X"], "Kiwi": ["E", "5", "4"], "Bee": ["E", "X"], "Giraffe": ["E", "4"], "Ox": ["E", "X"]} |
|
0d908396-4045-42af-9f1c-8b06ac2c0788 30745af3-b883-4a19-a518-340251ba43a7 SUBMIT Ox E,X 0.5 0.0 {"Lobster": ["X"], "Kiwi": ["E", "5", "4"], "Bee": ["E", "X"], "Giraffe": ["E", "4"], "Ox": ["E", "X"]} |
|
0d908396-4045-42af-9f1c-8b06ac2c0788 4b3cb598-ba03-4d38-8771-d5f1b8838562 MESSAGE Bee Any advantage to going with X and E over say 5 and 4? Any advantage to going with <CARD> and <CARD> over say <CARD> and <CARD> ? Probing Reasoning 0 0.5 0.0 E,X,5,4 {"Lobster": ["X"], "Kiwi": ["E", "5", "4"], "Bee": ["E", "X", "5", "4"], "Giraffe": ["E", "4"], "Ox": ["E", "X"]} |
|
0d908396-4045-42af-9f1c-8b06ac2c0788 249bb8bd-01bb-49cc-a282-9491473a89f3 MESSAGE Bee 'Ok, I don''t think there is. Let''s go with X and E and submit. I think we''ve spend enough time on this.' 'Ok , I don''t think there is . Let''s go with <CARD> and <CARD> and submit . I think we''ve spend enough time on this .' Non-probing-deliberation Reasoning complete_solution 0.5 0.0 E,X {"Lobster": ["X"], "Kiwi": ["E", "5", "4"], "Bee": ["E", "X"], "Giraffe": ["E", "4"], "Ox": ["E", "X"]} |
|
0d908396-4045-42af-9f1c-8b06ac2c0788 26f2f214-fc50-4b1d-a214-1b0050602d78 SUBMIT Bee E,X 0.5 0.0 {"Lobster": ["X"], "Kiwi": ["E", "5", "4"], "Bee": ["E", "X"], "Giraffe": ["E", "4"], "Ox": ["E", "X"]} |
|
0d908396-4045-42af-9f1c-8b06ac2c0788 937ac7d0-2416-40a5-bf02-bbb07ef03209 MESSAGE Kiwi stop its wrong stop its wrong Non-probing-deliberation Disagree 0 0.5 0.0 {"Lobster": ["X"], "Kiwi": ["E", "5", "4"], "Bee": ["E", "X"], "Giraffe": ["E", "4"], "Ox": ["E", "X"]} |
|
0d908396-4045-42af-9f1c-8b06ac2c0788 ebf453cc-ed47-4faf-b087-ef0e4de3f94b MESSAGE Kiwi I think to confirm the rule you need to choose the e and flip it to see a even number and the 5 to flip to see a costanant o0r non vowel because we already know whats on this side but wwe do not know whats on the other side I think to confirm the rule you need to choose the <CARD> and flip it to see a even number and the <CARD> to flip to see a costanant o0r non vowel because we already know whats on this side but wwe do not know whats on the other side Non-probing-deliberation Reasoning complete_solution 0.55 0.05 E,5 {"Lobster": ["X"], "Kiwi": ["E", "5"], "Bee": ["E", "X"], "Giraffe": ["E", "4"], "Ox": ["E", "X"]} |
|
0d908396-4045-42af-9f1c-8b06ac2c0788 46e59dc7-d6d9-425b-81a7-0669f4c7610a SUBMIT Kiwi 5,X,E 0.5 -0.05 {"Lobster": ["X"], "Kiwi": ["5", "X", "E"], "Bee": ["E", "X"], "Giraffe": ["E", "4"], "Ox": ["E", "X"]} |
|
0d908396-4045-42af-9f1c-8b06ac2c0788 e95b0050-fe8a-4a6e-911d-6f917b628b27 SUBMIT Kiwi 5,E 0.55 0.05 {"Lobster": ["X"], "Kiwi": ["5", "E"], "Bee": ["E", "X"], "Giraffe": ["E", "4"], "Ox": ["E", "X"]} |
|
0d908396-4045-42af-9f1c-8b06ac2c0788 a2f68163-9ed5-423d-a251-5279a4c541c5 SUBMIT Kiwi 5,E 0.55 0.0 {"Lobster": ["X"], "Kiwi": ["5", "E"], "Bee": ["E", "X"], "Giraffe": ["E", "4"], "Ox": ["E", "X"]} |
|
|