|
<html> |
|
<title> - OVERSIGHT OF UNITED STATES COUNTERNARCOTICS ASSISTANCE TO COLOMBIA</title> |
|
<body><pre> |
|
[House Hearing, 105 Congress] |
|
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OVERSIGHT OF UNITED STATES COUNTERNARCOTICS ASSISTANCE TO COLOMBIA |
|
======================================================================= |
|
|
|
|
|
HEARING |
|
|
|
before the |
|
|
|
SUBCOMMITTEE ON NATIONAL SECURITY, |
|
INTERNATIONAL AFFAIRS, AND CRIMINAL JUSTICE |
|
|
|
of the |
|
|
|
COMMITTEE ON GOVERNMENT |
|
REFORM AND OVERSIGHT |
|
HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES |
|
|
|
ONE HUNDRED FIFTH CONGRESS |
|
|
|
FIRST SESSION |
|
__________ |
|
|
|
FEBRUARY 14, 1997 |
|
__________ |
|
|
|
Serial No. 105-7 |
|
__________ |
|
|
|
Printed for the use of the Committee on Government Reform and Oversight |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE |
|
39-818 WASHINGTON : 1997 |
|
____________________________________________________________________________ |
|
For Sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office |
|
Internet: bookstore.gpo.gov Phone: toll free (866) 512-1800; (202) 512-1800 |
|
Fax: (202) 512-2250 Mail: Stop SSOP, Washington, DC 20402-0001 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
COMMITTEE ON GOVERNMENT REFORM AND OVERSIGHT |
|
|
|
DAN BURTON, Indiana, Chairman |
|
BENJAMIN A. GILMAN, New York HENRY A. WAXMAN, California |
|
J. DENNIS HASTERT, Illinois TOM LANTOS, California |
|
CONSTANCE A. MORELLA, Maryland ROBERT E. WISE, Jr., West Virginia |
|
CHRISTOPHER SHAYS, Connecticut MAJOR R. OWENS, New York |
|
STEVEN H. SCHIFF, New Mexico EDOLPHUS TOWNS, New York |
|
CHRISTOPHER COX, California PAUL E. KANJORSKI, Pennsylvania |
|
ILEANA ROS-LEHTINEN, Florida GARY A. CONDIT, California |
|
JOHN M. McHUGH, New York CAROLYN B. MALONEY, New York |
|
STEPHEN HORN, California THOMAS M. BARRETT, Wisconsin |
|
JOHN L. MICA, Florida ELEANOR HOLMES NORTON, Washington, |
|
THOMAS M. DAVIS, Virginia DC |
|
DAVID M. McINTOSH, Indiana CHAKA FATTAH, Pennsylvania |
|
MARK E. SOUDER, Indiana TIM HOLDEN, Pennsylvania |
|
JOE SCARBOROUGH, Florida ELIJAH E. CUMMINGS, Maryland |
|
JOHN SHADEGG, Arizona DENNIS KUCINICH, Ohio |
|
STEVEN C. LaTOURETTE, Ohio ROD R. BLAGOJEVICH, Illinois |
|
MARSHALL ``MARK'' SANFORD, South DANNY K. DAVIS, Illinois |
|
Carolina JOHN F. TIERNEY, Massachusetts |
|
JOHN E. SUNUNU, New Hampshire JIM TURNER, Texas |
|
PETE SESSIONS, Texas THOMAS H. ALLEN, Maine |
|
MIKE PAPPAS, New Jersey ------ |
|
VINCE SNOWBARGER, Kansas BERNARD SANDERS, Vermont |
|
BOB BARR, Georgia (Independent) |
|
------ ------ |
|
Kevin Binger, Staff Director |
|
Daniel R. Moll, Deputy Staff Director |
|
Judith McCoy, Chief Clerk |
|
Phil Schiliro, Minority Staff Director |
|
------ |
|
|
|
Subcommittee on National Security, International Affairs, and Criminal |
|
Justice |
|
|
|
J. DENNIS HASTERT, Chairman |
|
MARK SOUDER, Indiana THOMAS M. BARRETT, Wisconsin |
|
CHRISTOPHER SHAYS, Connecticut TOM LANTOS, California |
|
STEVEN SCHIFF, New Mexico BOB WISE, West Virginia |
|
ILEANA ROS-LEHTINEN, Florida GARY A. CONDIT, California |
|
JOHN McHUGH, New York ROD R. BLAGOJEVICH, Illinois |
|
JOHN L. MICA, Florida CAROLYN B. MALONEY, New York |
|
JOHN B. SHADEGG, Arizona ELIJAH E. CUMMINGS, Maryland |
|
STEVE LaTOURETTE, Ohio JIM TURNER, Texas |
|
BOB BARR, Georgia |
|
|
|
Ex Officio |
|
|
|
DAN BURTON, Indiana HENRY A. WAXMAN, California |
|
Robert Charles, Staff Director |
|
Sean Littlefield, Professional Staff Member |
|
Ianthe Saylor, Clerk |
|
Ronald Stroman, Minority Professional Staff |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
C O N T E N T S |
|
|
|
---------- |
|
Page |
|
Hearing held on February 14, 1997................................ 1 |
|
Statement of: |
|
Busby, Morris, former Ambassador to Colombia; and Major F. |
|
Andy Messing, Jr., United States Army (Ret.), executive |
|
director, National Defense Council Foundation.............. 80 |
|
Gelbard, Robert S., Assistant Secretary, Bureau of |
|
International Narcotics and Law Enforcement Affairs, |
|
Department of State........................................ 4 |
|
Serrano, Major General Jose Rosso, director, Colombian |
|
national police; and General Harold Bedoya Pizarro, |
|
commander, Colombian Armed Forces.......................... 51 |
|
Letters, statements, etc., submitted for the record by: |
|
Bedoya Pizarro, General Harold, commander, Colombian Armed |
|
Forces, prepared statement of.............................. 63 |
|
Busby, Morris, former Ambassador to Colombia, prepared |
|
statement of............................................... 83 |
|
Gelbard, Robert S., Assistant Secretary, Bureau of |
|
International Narcotics and Law Enforcement Affairs, |
|
Department of State: |
|
Information concerning assistance furnished under the |
|
authority of section 506(a)(1) of the FAA.............. 48 |
|
Information concerning extraditions...................... 47 |
|
Information concerning ``river patrol boats''............ 50 |
|
Prepared statement of.................................... 8 |
|
Messing, Major F. Andy, Jr., U.S. Army (Ret.), executive |
|
director, National Defense Council Foundation: |
|
NDCF Colombia Report 1997................................ 95 |
|
Prepared statement of.................................... 91 |
|
Serrano, Major General Jose Rosso, director, Colombian |
|
national police, prepared statement of..................... 55 |
|
Valdivieso, General, prepared statement of................... 70 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OVERSIGHT OF UNITED STATES COUNTER-NARCOTICS ASSISTANCE TO COLOMBIA |
|
|
|
---------- |
|
|
|
|
|
FRIDAY, FEBRUARY 14, 1997 |
|
|
|
House of Representatives, |
|
Subcommittee on National Security, International |
|
Affairs, and Criminal Justice, |
|
Committee on Government Reform and Oversight, |
|
Washington, DC. |
|
The subcommittee met, pursuant to notice, at 9:08 a.m., in |
|
room 2154, Rayburn House Office Building, Hon. J. Dennis |
|
Hastert (chairman of the subcommittee) presiding. |
|
Present: Representatives Hastert, Schiff, Mica, Souder, |
|
LaTourette, Barr and Barrett. |
|
Staff present: Robert Charles, staff director and chief |
|
counsel; Sean Littlefield, professional staff member; Ianthe |
|
Saylor, clerk; Ronald Stroman, minority professional staff; and |
|
Ellen Rayner, minority chief clerk. |
|
Mr. Hastert. The Subcommittee on National Security, |
|
International Affairs, and Criminal Justice will come to order. |
|
First of all, I want to bid everyone good morning and thank |
|
you for coming today. This is the subcommittee's first hearing |
|
of the 105th Congress. This is also my first hearing as |
|
chairman of this subcommittee. I think we have our work cut out |
|
for us, especially what we are going to talk about today, the |
|
drug war, in this country, in our southern hemisphere, and, of |
|
course, in the world. |
|
The drug usage rates of our young people clearly show the |
|
drug war must continue. Frankly, that is why we are here today. |
|
I want to pause long enough to welcome all our new members |
|
and our returning members and to extend a special welcome to |
|
our ranking member, Mr. Tom Barrett. I look forward to working |
|
with Tom and developing a very, very fine relationship. I hope |
|
over the next 2 years in the many important oversight |
|
challenges we face that we can do it together on a bipartisan |
|
basis. |
|
The title of today's hearing may lead one to believe that |
|
this hearing is only about Colombia. It is certainly about the |
|
heroic efforts of certain Colombians in the drug war, including |
|
General Serrano, General Bedoya and Prosecutor General |
|
Valdivieso; but it is also about the youth of America, our |
|
children, and, frankly, our future. |
|
In the last 3 years, six homicides in Aurora, IL, the town |
|
of my birth and the town I represent, have been drug related. |
|
As recently as June, Claudia Remos and Juan Medina were killed |
|
and their bodies dumped on a road side. Six-year-old Nicholas |
|
Contreras was shot and killed in his sleep in a drug-related |
|
crime. We must stop the effect of drugs in our country. |
|
The overwhelming majority of the cocaine and heroin that |
|
leaves Colombia is headed straight to cities and towns like |
|
Aurora, IL; and the target population for the growing and |
|
diversifying drug cartels is mainly our youth. The |
|
international drug onslaught is the most insidious national |
|
security threat we face as a Nation. This is why it is so vital |
|
that we provide ample counternarcotic support to the brave and |
|
honest men and women who work hard in the drug war in this |
|
country and in Colombia. Those individuals are fighting not |
|
only for Colombia's survival but also for ours. |
|
The timing of this hearing, just weeks prior to the annual |
|
recertification decision by the President, is not a |
|
coincidence. I am concerned that last year's decision to |
|
decertify Colombia impeded foreign military sales to Colombia. |
|
If the President decides to decertify Colombia for the second |
|
year in a row, I am at least hopeful that he will present |
|
Congress with the legislation that will allow the military |
|
sales for the limited purpose of counternarcotic missions. |
|
I also plan to work with the Department of State and the |
|
Committee on International Relations to find a way to expedite |
|
the transfer of these tools that are needed to fight this war. |
|
Every day that a DC-3 or a Huey or Black Hawk helicopter is not |
|
flying, more drugs reach our streets. We cannot afford to have |
|
any more delays in the transport of equipment or spare parts in |
|
our counternarcotics support for Colombia. |
|
International drug trafficking organizations based in |
|
Colombia are the world's leading producers of cocaine. |
|
Colombian traffickers also continue to supply marijuana to the |
|
United States, and recent indications are that Colombian drug |
|
trafficking organizations are making quantum leaps in the |
|
production and trafficking of heroin. |
|
Colombia is engaged in a drug war, and its outcome affects |
|
all Americans. Some of the bravest men and women in the world |
|
are entangled in a war against the narcotraffickers and the |
|
guerillas that support them. |
|
There should be no mistake. The guerillas of Colombia long |
|
ago abandoned ideology. They work with the international drug |
|
traffickers--providing security, cultivating crops and manning |
|
cocaine labs. The guerillas engage in some of the most ruthless |
|
behavior in our hemisphere. They kidnap, they kill, and they |
|
sustain their carnage with drug money provided by American |
|
consumers, most of them kids. |
|
Today's hearing will focus on what the United States can |
|
and should do to generally support the counternarcotics efforts |
|
in Colombia to stop these deadly drugs and violent drug |
|
traffickers before they get to the United States shores. |
|
Let's lay it on the line. There can be no doubt that |
|
Colombia's political and judicial systems are confronting |
|
corruption. Sentences for drug traffickers need to be |
|
strengthened, and a re-examination of money laundering and |
|
extradition needs to take place now. |
|
However, honest Colombian Government officials like General |
|
Bedoya and General Serrano should be applauded and certainly |
|
fully supported. How can we ask honest Colombians like these |
|
men to continue putting their lives on the line every day |
|
without basic United States support for the international drug |
|
effort? The truth is that such support is both good government |
|
and cost-effective to us at home in the United States. |
|
Before proceeding with our first witness, I am pleased to |
|
turn to my colleague, the subcommittee's ranking minority |
|
member, Tom Barrett of Wisconsin, for any opening remarks he |
|
might have. |
|
Mr. Barrett. Thank you, Mr. Chairman, and congratulations |
|
on heading this subcommittee. I am looking forward to working |
|
with you, and I am very optimistic that we will be able to work |
|
closely on a lot of these issues which are basically |
|
nonpartisan in nature. I think that this committee plays an |
|
important role; and, as evidenced by the hearing today, this is |
|
a committee that will look into issues that have tremendous |
|
importance to our country. |
|
The issue of drug trafficking in America is clearly one of |
|
the most serious issues we face as a Nation; and, as the father |
|
of three young children, I share with you the concern of easy |
|
access of drugs to American youth and will do everything I can |
|
to make sure we have the tools necessary to combat drug use |
|
both internationally and domestically. |
|
The cost to our society of illegal drug use is staggering. |
|
Substance abuse and addiction cost is now estimated at $400 |
|
billion a year. Two million Americans use cocaine at least once |
|
a week, and 500,000 are addicted to crack cocaine. |
|
Colombia has a close relationship to this problem, because |
|
the threat to the United States from Colombia is significant. |
|
Eighty percent of the cocaine available in the United States is |
|
produced in Colombia, and 60 percent of the heroin being seized |
|
in the United States can be traced to Colombia. |
|
This is a timely hearing since the administration will be |
|
making many important decisions in the future, including the |
|
very important issue of whether to continue decertification of |
|
Colombia. I am very excited and very interested to hear from |
|
our witnesses today because I think this issue of how we deal |
|
with a foreign government and how we deal with the drug problem |
|
in another country is a very thorny issue; and I think all of |
|
us agree that we, as a country, have to do everything we can to |
|
stop the drug trafficking from Colombia and other countries but |
|
also make sure we are doing it in a prudent way. |
|
So I look forward to this hearing and turn it back over to |
|
you. |
|
Mr. Hastert. At this time I would ask, without objection, |
|
that all opening statements be submitted for the record. Any |
|
objection? So ordered. |
|
I would like now to welcome Assistant Secretary of State |
|
for International Narcotics and Law Enforcement Affairs, |
|
Ambassador Gelbard. Ambassador Gelbard has been involved in our |
|
foreign relations with Latin America since his service with the |
|
Peace Corps. In addition to his assignments to European and |
|
African issues, Ambassador Gelbard served as Ambassador to |
|
Bolivia from 1988 to 1991, and most recently is the Principal |
|
Deputy Assistant Secretary of State for Inter-American affairs. |
|
I think probably when you find a tough place to deal with, |
|
Ambassador Galbard tends to be there; and it shows the great |
|
confidence our administration has in him. |
|
Ambassador, we are pleased to have you here. If you would |
|
stand and raise your right hand, the committee's rules require |
|
me to swear you in. |
|
[Witness sworn.] |
|
Let the record show the witness responded in the |
|
affirmative. Thank you. |
|
Please proceed with your opening statement. I assume you |
|
have an oral statement. Anything else will be submitted for the |
|
record. |
|
|
|
STATEMENT OF ROBERT S. GELBARD, ASSISTANT SECRETARY, BUREAU OF |
|
INTERNATIONAL NARCOTICS AND LAW ENFORCEMENT AFFAIRS, DEPARTMENT |
|
OF STATE |
|
|
|
Mr. Gelbard. Thank you, Mr. Chairman. |
|
Please let me also congratulate you on your chairmanship. I |
|
think it is worth stating that, thanks to your efforts, in |
|
addition to some others, the budget for my bureau dedicated to |
|
counternarcotics and anti-crime measures throughout the world |
|
was substantially increased for this fiscal year; and I |
|
appreciated your efforts very much, sir. |
|
As you said, sir, I do have a written statement that I |
|
would like to submit for the record. I am pleased to have this |
|
opportunity to discuss with you the United States |
|
counternarcotics policy toward Colombia. |
|
President Clinton denied certification to Colombia last |
|
year because the efforts of Colombia's honest officials were |
|
being undermined by corruption at the highest levels of the |
|
Colombian Congress and Government. Our challenge was to |
|
maintain pressure on a president we believe to have been |
|
influenced and even corrupted by traffickers, while also |
|
supporting constructive Colombian anti-drug efforts. |
|
The strategy has produced progress on some of our key |
|
objectives over the last 12 months. We have maintained support |
|
for essential counternarcotics programs and institutions in |
|
Colombia. In fact, from fiscal year 1996 to fiscal year 1997, |
|
we have doubled our assistance, most of which is destined for |
|
the Colombian national police. |
|
At the same time, we pressed the government to take |
|
specific policy and legislative actions to strengthen the law |
|
enforcement and judicial sectors. These include strengthening |
|
money laundering laws and enacting tough asset forfeiture and |
|
sentencing laws; extradition of Colombian nationals wanted for |
|
crimes abroad; supporting investigations and prosecutions |
|
targeting corrupt public officials; stepping up coca |
|
eradication and opium eradication; agreeing on a bilateral |
|
maritime agreement; continuing law enforcement and judicial |
|
action against traffickers, along with their prosecution, |
|
conviction and sentencing to prison terms commensurate with |
|
their crimes; dismantling of their organizations; and |
|
forfeiture of their front companies and ill-gotten proceeds. |
|
These objectives should not have come as a surprise to the |
|
Colombian Government. In 1994, shortly after his election, |
|
President Samper promised to increase the penalties for drug |
|
traffickers, remove plea bargaining loopholes and send the |
|
political cronies of the cartels to jail. In fact, he put these |
|
promises as well as many others in a letter he sent to Members |
|
of the U.S. Congress. |
|
Instead of following through, however, Samper publicly |
|
attacked the Prosecutor General's Office for its far-reaching |
|
investigation of political corruption known as the ``Case |
|
8,000.'' An investigation in which he himself was implicated as |
|
well as other top administration and congressional figures. |
|
Despite credible evidence that his political campaign had |
|
accepted more than $6 million in drug money, President Samper |
|
was exonerated by the Colombian Congress through a patently |
|
flawed process. |
|
From our standpoint, however, the evidence that Samper |
|
aided and abetted drug traffickers was sufficient to warrant |
|
the revocation of his visa last year. The denial of |
|
certification, international pressure and the threat of |
|
economic sanctions has produced some progress on key |
|
legislation, a maritime agreement this year and expanded the |
|
eradication program. |
|
The Government of Colombia has failed, however, to follow |
|
through on promised counternarcotics action or to confront |
|
fully the drug interests that contributed millions of dollars |
|
to President Samper's campaign. In concrete terms, the |
|
Colombian Government effectively ignored United States warnings |
|
that the Cali kingpins continued to run their operations from |
|
prison. |
|
In late January, a few weeks ago, top drug lords Gilberto |
|
and Miguel Rodriguez Orejuela were sentenced to absurdly short |
|
prison terms, accompanied by ridiculously small fines. Given |
|
the mandatory sentence reductions under existing Colombian |
|
sentencing guidelines, these international criminals could |
|
ultimately serve only 4 or 5 more years apiece in prison. |
|
If President Samper had acted promptly on his own 1994 |
|
commitments that he put in writing to this Congress, these |
|
sentences might have reflected the seriousness of their crimes. |
|
In stark contrast to the Colombian sentences, a United States |
|
Federal judge on January 31st of this year sentenced Mexican |
|
drug lord Juan Garcia Abrego, a long-time associate of the |
|
Rodriguez Orejuelas, to 11 life terms, a fine of $128 million |
|
and forfeited assets worth $350 million. Interesting contrast. |
|
Despite the obvious inadequacy of Colombia's law, the |
|
Samper administration has made so serious an effort to |
|
reinstate the case for reinstatement of extradition or to |
|
launch a constitutional reform initiative. |
|
We will hold the Government of Colombia to the promise its |
|
new Ambassador just made to President Clinton when he presented |
|
his credentials that the government will introduce such a bill |
|
next month. Meanwhile, our request for four top Cali |
|
traffickers have gone unanswered, and we have learned that the |
|
government has never filed them in the Colombian Supreme Court |
|
as promised. |
|
The asset forfeiture law passed in December is a good one. |
|
However, the legislation must stand a review of the |
|
constitutional court, a test which some Colombians observers |
|
believe the law was designed to fail. Moreover, the first |
|
attempt at implementation of the law failed when the hold on |
|
assets placed in the names of the family and friends of the |
|
Rodriguez Orejuela brothers was lifted at the time of their |
|
sentencing. |
|
We can only judge the Colombian Government by its concrete |
|
actions. As recently as late last year, while the investigation |
|
and trial of the Cali kingpins was under way, Samper and |
|
Interior Minister Serpa were actively pursuing negotiations |
|
with the Cali mafia kingpins, which clearly would have |
|
undermined the efforts of the Colombian police and the |
|
Prosecutor General's Office. This revelation was merely another |
|
reminder that President Samper's commitment to take on the top |
|
traffickers must be evaluated on the basis of specific results |
|
rather than on stated intentions. |
|
While failing to address certain issues, the Samper |
|
administration sought to recover international legitimacy by |
|
improving cooperation on other fronts, including its agreement |
|
to the United States-funded expansion of the coca crop |
|
eradication and its initialing, several weeks ago, of a |
|
maritime interdiction agreement. |
|
Private sector leaders have begun to press the government |
|
to pass key legislation, and Colombian industry has sought more |
|
direct cooperation with the United States to counter the drug |
|
trade. The Colombia Flower Growers Association has taken a |
|
particularly courageous stand in favor of the asset forfeiture |
|
law and extradition. |
|
Unprecedented application by the President of the |
|
International Emergency Economic Powers Act against the Cali |
|
mafia front companies also stimulated the private sector, and |
|
particularly the private bankers association, to implement |
|
tighter voluntary controls over its members. |
|
At the operational level, our counternarcotics cooperation |
|
with the Colombian national police and its leader, General |
|
Serrano, the Prosecutor General's Office and the elements of |
|
the armed forces remain very good. In the past year, we doubled |
|
our assistance to Colombia from $22.6 million to some $44 |
|
million this fiscal year to support interdiction law |
|
enforcement and eradication operations. Part of this increase |
|
will be devoted to purchasing nonlethal military equipment and |
|
spare parts. |
|
We also have dramatically increased our aviation support to |
|
the Colombian national police, including the provision of 12 |
|
additional helicopters and the use of additional spray and |
|
support aircraft. We will soon deploy five upgraded spray |
|
aircraft worth $84 million by the end of next month and 12 more |
|
UH-1H helicopters associated with the President's 506(a)(2) |
|
drawdown package. We have also allocated for the first time |
|
funds to support the army and the rest of the armed forces in |
|
counternarcotics efforts. |
|
Combined police-military interdiction efforts in 1996 |
|
focused on denying drug cultivators and processors the |
|
chemicals used to process cocaine. This effort produced a |
|
substantial increase in precursor chemical seizures and in the |
|
number of laboratories destroyed. At the same time, the shift |
|
in focus of interdiction operations and the devotion of more |
|
resources to the eradication program resulted in a significant |
|
drop in the seizure of drug trafficking aircraft, cocaine, and |
|
heroin as compared to 1995. |
|
We have worked more closely than ever with the Colombian |
|
police to carry out a much-enhanced aerial eradication program. |
|
Our expanded aerial eradication program in 1996 presented |
|
significant challenges which the Colombian police have accepted |
|
without hesitation. The military also rose to this challenge, |
|
increasing their support to the police eradication effort. |
|
However, despite the clear commitment of the Colombian |
|
police to the eradication program, the Colombian Government has |
|
strongly opposed the testing of safe granular herbicides, such |
|
as hexazanone, which we know to be significantly more effective |
|
in killing coca than the current herbicides being used. |
|
Colombia's coca crop expanded by over 30 percent last year. |
|
This is in contrast to Peru, where there was an 18 percent |
|
decrease. It expanded from almost 51,000 hectares to over |
|
67,000 hectares, in spite of our efforts to expand the |
|
eradication program and make it more effective. Cultivation |
|
increased by 13 percent between 1994 and 1995 and has also |
|
tripled since 1987. |
|
Colombia now provides 32 percent of all coca produced in |
|
the world. This continued expansion points to one of the |
|
greatest challenges Colombia and we together face in stamping |
|
out the drug trade. |
|
The crop has been steadily expanding since 1987, and we |
|
must recognize the decisive role played by some of Colombia's |
|
insurgent guerilla groups. They identified an economic |
|
opportunity--the insatiable desire of drug traffickers for a |
|
reliable source of cocaine products--and carved out a |
|
significant portion of that market for themselves. |
|
The increased self-sufficiency of Colombia's drug industry |
|
has significant implications for our efforts to eliminate this |
|
scourge. Those guerilla fronts engaged in the industry now have |
|
a proven source of income and a vested interest in expanding |
|
and protecting the trade. These guerilla fronts constitute a |
|
real threat to Colombian anti-drug forces deployed to eradicate |
|
fields and the American personnel who support them, including, |
|
sadly, the loss of one American life late last year. |
|
In this environment, Colombian counternarcotics cooperation |
|
and the government's clear support of its own police and |
|
military, prosecutors, judges, and other government officials |
|
on the front line of this struggle are more important than |
|
ever. We have implemented a strategy that is producing some |
|
progress on key legislation, and that has galvanized the |
|
private sector in taking a more active role in pressing for |
|
action. We have seen results clearly from decertification last |
|
year. |
|
We must continue to provide a high level of direct support, |
|
assistance and encouragement to those in Colombia dedicated to |
|
ending this drug scourge and the corruption it has engendered. |
|
Above all, we must continue to make clear to the Colombian |
|
Government that the American people expect concrete results. |
|
Thank you, Mr. Chairman. |
|
[The prepared statement of Mr. Gelbard follows:] |
|
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T9818.001 |
|
|
|
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T9818.002 |
|
|
|
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T9818.003 |
|
|
|
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T9818.004 |
|
|
|
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T9818.005 |
|
|
|
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T9818.006 |
|
|
|
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T9818.007 |
|
|
|
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T9818.008 |
|
|
|
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T9818.009 |
|
|
|
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T9818.010 |
|
|
|
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T9818.011 |
|
|
|
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T9818.012 |
|
|
|
Mr. Hastert. Thank you very much for your testimony. I |
|
think we understand very clearly why the administration used |
|
the tool of decertification to try to move the Government of |
|
Colombia into areas that they seem to lack and should be |
|
improved upon, but after President Clinton announced Colombia's |
|
decertification on March 1, 1996, it seems to me that there was |
|
a lack of the State Department's perception of what effect |
|
decertification would have on assistance programs. As a matter |
|
of fact, the State Department did not announce their decision |
|
that only foreign military financing was prohibited and that |
|
foreign military sales were not, which involved some of the |
|
spray planes and the helicopters and some of the things that |
|
were necessary to make those, that equipment fly. |
|
From March until September, the State Department prevented |
|
all assistance from reaching Colombia, and only in September |
|
did the State Department announce that FMF, or financing, and |
|
not sales assistance was blocked by decertification. Can you |
|
help us or enlighten us as to why that decision to decertify |
|
was taken when no one seems to have understood, basically, the |
|
ramifications, at least in the movement of equipment, to |
|
General Serrano and others that needed that equipment after |
|
decertification? |
|
Mr. Gelbard. The President made the decision to decertify |
|
Colombia because there was a clear unwillingness on the part of |
|
the Government of Colombia to cooperate with the United States |
|
in counternarcotics efforts. All indicators were very clear in |
|
their failure to comply with the commitments that Samper |
|
himself had made, as I mentioned earlier, to the Congress of |
|
the United States, in an unsolicited letter he sent in July |
|
1994. |
|
Just running through the various commitments he gave made |
|
it very clear they did not comply. So it was a clear-cut |
|
decision that the President made. It was a difficult decision |
|
because it was the first time a President of the United States |
|
had ever decided to decertify a democratic government, but it |
|
was based on the unanimous recommendations of the President's |
|
relevant Cabinet members to him. |
|
The decision to decertify did not in any way affect the |
|
support provided to the police. It did not in any way affect |
|
that support, I want to be very clear. Nor did it affect this |
|
provision, the provision of spray planes, for example, which |
|
are flown by the Colombian police. Now, because the spray |
|
program was stalling, we have provided, with the agreement of |
|
the Colombian Government, American pilots to spray and to |
|
train, while they are spraying, Colombian pilots in what is a |
|
very difficult endeavor. |
|
However, the clear-cut interpretation of the law, the |
|
Foreign Assistance Act, was that under decertification it was |
|
not possible to provide military assistance to the Colombian |
|
armed forces under FMF and FMS. We supported efforts in the |
|
Congress to change that law last year, and unfortunately, the |
|
Congress was unable to vote in favor of that change. We |
|
continue to support a change in that law so that we could |
|
provide FMF and FMS assistance to the Colombian armed forces. |
|
Nevertheless, what I am doing in this fiscal year, as I |
|
mentioned in my testimony, is for the first time providing |
|
funding to the Colombian military from my own budget; and we |
|
have in our Congressional presentation for fiscal year 1997 |
|
budgeted $5 million to support their counternarcotics efforts |
|
out of the $44 million that is currently in the budget. |
|
Mr. Hastert. Well, let's just try to clear some things up |
|
here. |
|
As you well know, I was in Colombia last year, last spring, |
|
and met with the Ambassador and tried in a limited period of |
|
time to see what the operation was, and I had a meeting with |
|
General Serrano and others. It seems to me that was the time, |
|
right after that decision was made, early April, the decision |
|
was made in March, the decertification decision, due to the |
|
judgment of the State Department lawyers, and others did delay |
|
critical counternarcotics aid under FMS. Is that right or not? |
|
Mr. Gelbard. It wasn't just State Department lawyers, it |
|
was Pentagon lawyers and Department of Justice lawyers; and |
|
with all due respect to the lawyers on the committee--I am not |
|
one--I too was quite frustrated by the lack of movement and |
|
decision on this. But as a result, we did support the desire to |
|
change the law. As I say, we were quite frustrated by the |
|
inability to do so. |
|
Mr. Hastert. So there was a delay in the movement of the |
|
equipment. |
|
Mr. Gelbard. To the military, not to the police. |
|
Mr. Hastert. The police--well, let's work on it. We will |
|
hear testimony later and certainly try to clear that up. |
|
Also, in your opinion, the police--General Serrano was |
|
complying, and he happens to be the lead commander in beating |
|
back the narcotics traffickers in my opinion and I think many |
|
other opinions. Do you feel he had all the assistance he |
|
needed? |
|
Mr. Gelbard. We have strongly supported General Serrano, |
|
whom I have known for all the time he has been in his job, even |
|
before he was promoted to this position. I strongly supported |
|
his being named to this position and urged the Government of |
|
Colombia to appoint him. We have worked very closely with him |
|
to try to provide everything we could. Unfortunately, the |
|
Government of Colombia itself has significantly reduced the |
|
budget of the military and the budget of the police, so they |
|
have decreased their support to these entities. |
|
Mr. Hastert. Well, I think it is our purpose here to |
|
certainly try to work together, and we are not trying to find |
|
any indictments of the past. We are trying to find how we can |
|
work through this thing in the future. |
|
As you well know, and in my opening statement, not giving |
|
these people the tools to do the job means there are more drugs |
|
and more death in our districts here in the United States, and |
|
certainly we want to find that solution and that answer. It is |
|
encouraging in your testimony hearing you say that you are |
|
suggesting and advising an increase in that budget; is that |
|
correct? |
|
Mr. Gelbard. It is more than suggesting and advising. We |
|
have targeted $44 million of support to Colombia to the |
|
military and police in this fiscal year, and that was what was |
|
provided to the Congress in our congressional presentation |
|
for---- |
|
Mr. Hastert. For this coming fiscal year. |
|
Mr. Gelbard. Yes, sir. |
|
Mr. Hastert. I will yield my time to the gentleman from |
|
Wisconsin. |
|
Mr. Barrett. Thank you, Mr. Chairman. |
|
Ambassador Gelbard, you stated your frustration with the |
|
delays in getting assistance to the military. I look at |
|
something that happened under the first decertification |
|
process. If Colombia is decertified again, will we face a |
|
similar problem, or was that the result of a first-time |
|
decertification? |
|
Mr. Gelbard. We are working and would like to work with |
|
this Congress to work together in a very cooperative way to |
|
effect the kinds of changes that I mentioned earlier to permit |
|
the transfer of such equipment in FMF and FMS cases. |
|
Mr. Barrett. So the decertification measure still provides |
|
barriers to you in what you think you should be doing. |
|
Mr. Gelbard. Yes, sir. Let me just say, the legislation |
|
which would have amended the law was defeated in the final days |
|
of the last Congress, so that's why we are not able to move the |
|
equipment under those cases. |
|
Mr. Barrett. Specifically what would that legislation do? |
|
Mr. Gelbard. That would provide waiver authority so that |
|
the administration would have the authority to approve such |
|
cases. |
|
Mr. Barrett. I assume there will be some who would argue |
|
that, lacking that authority, we should not decertify. What are |
|
the benefits of decertification even without the ability to |
|
move that military? |
|
Mr. Gelbard. As I alluded to earlier, it is crystal clear, |
|
very sadly, that the Colombian Government under President |
|
Samper took very little action from the time he was sworn in on |
|
August 7, 1994, until March 1, 1996, when they were |
|
decertified. |
|
We have seen significant efforts in the last year to make |
|
progress, both right before the decertification decision and, |
|
oddly enough, in the last few weeks. The maritime interdiction |
|
agreement was just initialled a few weeks ago. The asset |
|
forfeiture agreement was just approved in late December, and |
|
there will be a special session of the Colombian Congress |
|
opening up next week to consider, finally, a much harsher |
|
sentencing law. This is clearly because of their concerns about |
|
possible decertification again. It's a sad story that there's |
|
only a positive response under threat or when there is actually |
|
decertification, but we have seen in the face of this |
|
corruption that that is the only thing that has produced |
|
results from the government itself. |
|
Mr. Barrett. My sense, from the questioning of the chairman |
|
and others, on this issue is that the transport of military |
|
equipment is the issue here. Is that correct or are there more |
|
issues underlying the issue of decertification? |
|
Mr. Gelbard. That has not been--that has been an adverse |
|
consequence of decertification. |
|
The other adverse consequences are that under the law there |
|
is a prohibition of the use of OPIC and Eximbank financing to |
|
countries that are decertified. We obviously don't like that |
|
because that hurts American companies. It hurts their |
|
competitiveness overseas. But in terms of all the rest of the |
|
consequences of decertification, we feel it has proved helpful, |
|
sadly. |
|
Mr. Barrett. OK. Again, if we were to put together the |
|
perfect policy for you so as to provide you with the best tools |
|
for fighting drugs in Colombia, would that entail--and I assume |
|
from your comments that at a minimum the administration is |
|
leading toward decertification again--but would decertification |
|
plus a change in the law, would that, do you think, make this a |
|
more effective battle? |
|
Mr. Gelbard. This has been, in fact, a relatively small |
|
part of the total amount of assistance provided to Colombia, so |
|
overall we don't feel that it's had an overwhelming effect. |
|
One important positive element that I should mention is |
|
that General Bedoya is now willing to dedicate Army units just |
|
to programs involving counternarcotics. That was not the case |
|
before in the Colombian military with his predecessors. One of |
|
the restrictions we have had in my own budget has been that our |
|
assistance has to go 100 percent for counternarcotics, it can't |
|
go for multiple purposes. |
|
General Bedoya and I discussed this just last night, and on |
|
the basis of this, we already, as I said, had budgeted $5 |
|
million in assistance for the Colombian military outside of the |
|
FMF, FMS issue. So we can provide assistance to them that way. |
|
Mr. Barrett. If you again could just go over the level of |
|
assistance and the changes, that would be helpful to me. |
|
Mr. Gelbard. This fiscal year we are increasing commodities |
|
to the Colombian police--aircraft parts, tools, avionics, field |
|
investigative equipment--from $7.4 million to $12.6 million. |
|
Training is at $1.5 million. Aircraft operations and so on are |
|
doubling from $4.1 million to $8 million. Military assistance |
|
would involve $2.5 million in commodities, $1 million in |
|
training and $1.5 million in other programs. |
|
Judicial sector reform, we are now picking up support for |
|
this very important program of $250,000, and we're providing |
|
aviation services. We will be providing aviation programs at |
|
$14 million, and in addition, new equipment this year involving |
|
UH-1H helicopters valued at $10.8 million, Bell 212 helicopters |
|
valued at $9 million, and OV-10 Bronco aircraft valued at $84 |
|
million. So actually that is a total of $147.8 million. |
|
Mr. Barrett. How does this compare to other countries? |
|
Mr. Gelbard. Far and away greater in terms of equipment and |
|
support to the interdiction law enforcement authorities. |
|
Mr. Barrett. Thank you. |
|
Thank you, Mr. Chairman. |
|
Mr. Hastert. Just a quick followup. That's for this coming |
|
fiscal year; is that correct? |
|
Mr. Gelbard. The current fiscal year, sir. |
|
Mr. Hastert. Let me just--another quick followup. The |
|
President could have had a 614 waiver; is that correct? |
|
Mr. Gelbard. The President theoretically could. We are |
|
studying that possibility right now. |
|
Mr. Hastert. Thank you. The vice chairman of this |
|
subcommittee, Mr. Souder from Indiana. |
|
Mr. Souder. Good morning. I've got a couple of questions. I |
|
thought I heard you say a minute ago that the Colombian |
|
Government had reduced support for the national police and |
|
General Serrano. |
|
Mr. Gelbard. General Bedoya told me that the budget |
|
provided to the armed forces and the police has been |
|
significantly reduced. |
|
Mr. Souder. Do you know what, when you say significantly? |
|
Mr. Gelbard. I would suggest you ask him when he appears. |
|
Mr. Souder. OK, because one of the core questions that's |
|
hard for a lot of people to understand here is, we have a |
|
democratic government in Colombia, and yet you are praising the |
|
national police, you are praising the attorney general, you are |
|
praising to some degree the military of Colombia, saying they |
|
are fighting with us, they have been courageous, they have |
|
obviously lost many lives in trying to do this. |
|
How do you explain that balance? |
|
Mr. Gelbard. In the case of the prosecutor general, he is |
|
independent from the government. He is actually part of the |
|
judiciary, and under the 1991 constitution, is independent. |
|
In the case of General Serrano and the Colombian police, as |
|
I say, we were actually quite instrumental in getting President |
|
Samper to remove a highly corrupt predecessor head of the |
|
national police, General Vargas. |
|
Mr. Souder. Was that enacted by the decertification? |
|
Mr. Gelbard. This was earlier than that, this was in 1994, |
|
and I personally provided the then minister of defense, who is |
|
now incarcerated himself for corruption, with significant |
|
information about General Vargas' corruption. |
|
General Serrano was appointed in his stead. He was at that |
|
time the police attache here, had worked very closely with |
|
government agencies such as DEA, and we felt at that time |
|
enormous confidence in him. It has been very clear that General |
|
Serrano has been heavily criticized by his own government, by |
|
his own congress, but he has shown enormous courage, both |
|
physical and moral, by continued to pursue the right course. |
|
Mr. Souder. What is kind of curious to me is, it seems like |
|
the most critical--I'm trying to sort through the |
|
decertification process--the most critical thing, ideally, and |
|
it's very frustrating, I know, when we were in Colombia, their |
|
frustration with the court process--they get somebody, and then |
|
they get off, and the sentencing problems you've talked about. |
|
But the most critical thing in this is the fact that we |
|
have the police, the defense and the attorney general on our |
|
side, and we are trying to put pressure on the rest. Would you |
|
agree that that--in a decertification process, is that |
|
something you look at? |
|
For example, if a country has a bigger problem in their law |
|
enforcement and police and defense, would that make them more |
|
or less likely to be decertified? Because corruption--I mean, |
|
we're looking in almost all these countries at mixes of this, |
|
and obviously one of the things I am hinting at, in Mexico we |
|
have a huge problem with the attorney general, we have a huge |
|
problem with corruption of the police, we have a huge problem |
|
with corruption in the military, and I am trying to sort out |
|
how you are making your decision of who you are certifying and |
|
who you are not certifying. |
|
Mr. Gelbard. When I announced the President's decision on |
|
certification last year, first of all, I made it a point to |
|
single out the excellent cooperation and work done by the |
|
Colombian police and by Prosecutor General Valdivieso and his |
|
staff. The test of the law, as I said then--and under the law, |
|
it's very clear; you can ask Congressman Mica, because I think |
|
he helped write that law--is whether the government has |
|
cooperated with us. |
|
The government, in this case, is the one headed by |
|
President Samper. We did not believe then that it was |
|
cooperating with us. The President still has not made his |
|
decision, obviously, on this year's certification process, but |
|
will. |
|
We tried to be very careful in terms of separating out the |
|
cooperation, the extraordinary cooperation we have received in |
|
working with General Serrano and his police, now with the army, |
|
with the prosecutor general, and with some others, from the |
|
undermining that has taken place on a consistent basis by |
|
others in the government. |
|
As I mentioned in my oral statement, the government has not |
|
even yet pursued what President Samper promised in his letter |
|
to the Congress in terms of extradition. He promised in this |
|
letter--he said we will present to Colombia's Congress |
|
stringent new anticorruption legislation. Well, it comes as no |
|
surprise that he hasn't done that. |
|
So we have seen, on the one hand, efforts by serious, |
|
patriotic people, but--and then they themselves have come out |
|
and thanked us for our support, but then they have been |
|
undermined by corruption. So the decision had to be made, based |
|
on the final results, and the final results we see in terms of |
|
the pathetic and just discouraging sentences for the Rodriguez |
|
Orejuelas, who continue to run their businesses from jail. |
|
Mr. Souder. I am not interested in trying to defend the |
|
President of Colombia, where he takes his money and what he's |
|
done. What I am saying is, the concept of the government here |
|
is nebulous when there are independent parts of the government; |
|
and what you are saying is, you would rather have the support |
|
of the president even if the police are corrupt, the defense |
|
may be corrupt, and there's changes in attorney general. But |
|
you would rather have the support of the president than, in |
|
Colombia's case, where we don't have the support of the |
|
president, but we have pressure in parliament and we have the |
|
support of the people actually cracking down in the drug war, |
|
who are dying and fighting for it. That's what I am trying to |
|
sort out. |
|
If it's just the President and what he is promising to do-- |
|
in fact, in your statement, you said the measure is what is |
|
being done, and in Colombia, they are fighting and dying; and |
|
part of my concern is that in some of the other countries that |
|
we're dealing with, they don't seem to be at the enforcement |
|
point, but they seem to be giving us some of the lip service. |
|
Mr. Gelbard. Congressman, what we're interested in, as I |
|
said many times in my statement, are concrete results. When we |
|
look at the concrete results, as I outlined some of them in the |
|
statement, and this was clearly the case by March 1st of last |
|
year, the concrete results, the bottom line, were inadequate. |
|
In spite of efforts by the police, in spite of efforts by |
|
General Valdivieso and others, but the concrete result, bottom |
|
line, were clearly inadequate. |
|
There is as much cocaine coming into the United States or |
|
being produced in Colombia as ever before. As the chairman |
|
said, there is more heroin being produced in Colombia than ever |
|
before. So that's the bottom line we've got to look at. We've |
|
got to look at the commitments that the government and the |
|
president himself made, and the kinds of laws that are |
|
necessary to produce the concrete bottom line results. |
|
Mr. Souder. Thank you, I am looking forward to working with |
|
you. |
|
Mr. Hastert. Thank you. I just want to say the gentleman |
|
from Indiana will serve as the vice chairman of this |
|
subcommittee. We're very proud of the work that he has done. He |
|
travelled with me last year to Mexico, Panama, Colombia, |
|
Bolivia, Peru, and certainly is a person we'll depend on a |
|
great deal to follow you through with on these issues. |
|
It's my pleasure to turn to the next gentleman on the |
|
panel, somebody who is very astute in the law and very famous |
|
in that area, the gentleman from New Mexico, Mr. Schiff. |
|
Mr. Schiff. Thank you, Mr. Chairman; thank you for holding |
|
this hearing. |
|
Mr. Ambassador, I'd like to ask a very basic question |
|
first. Every nation's government has a constant fight with |
|
corruption and influence of the criminal elements of one form |
|
or another. As you know, our own government is not immune from |
|
such infiltration. But yet, at least as is popularly |
|
understood, the Government of Colombia seems to have the worst |
|
problem virtually in the world in that regard. Again, that's |
|
the image of the Government of Colombia. |
|
What I'd like to ask is, is that an accurate perception of |
|
the Government of Colombia, and if so, can you explain why the |
|
Government of Colombia, the Nation of Colombia, seems to have a |
|
worse problem with such criminal infiltration than other |
|
governments do, acknowledging that the problem is universal? |
|
Mr. Gelbard. Well, first of all, Congressman, I wouldn't go |
|
so far as to say they have the worst corruption problem in the |
|
world. I think Nigeria may have that honor, but it's |
|
interesting, Transparency International just did some rankings |
|
on it, and I'd be happy to see if I could get them to you, |
|
because there is an interesting correlation between nation- |
|
states where the rule of law does not prevail, and where there |
|
is significant drug corruption--Nigeria, Burma, Colombia, a |
|
number of others. |
|
The tragedy of Colombia has been violence for many decades, |
|
going back many, many years; and particularly, I think one of |
|
the really dramatic and serious problems that we and the rest |
|
of the international community need to focus on more is-- |
|
particularly in the post-cold war period, we have new |
|
international security threats which are affecting democratic |
|
institutions, social and economic institutions. Transnational |
|
crime is clearly one of the most extraordinary that has |
|
developed. Drug trafficking and transnational crime are |
|
corrupting institutions everywhere, and Colombia, sadly, is one |
|
of the most dramatic cases, as you say. |
|
We have seen that the extraordinary financial power of the |
|
drug traffickers has now enabled them to corrupt a government, |
|
and lots of other elements throughout that society, including |
|
economic and social institutions. This is one of the great |
|
tragedies because it's one of oldest democracies in the Western |
|
Hemisphere. |
|
I think, once again, our--the decision by the President to |
|
decertify and the extraordinary decision by the President to |
|
revoke Samper's visa have caused a lot of elements and sectors |
|
in the Colombian society to really focus on this problem more |
|
than ever before. As I mentioned, we now have the Colombian |
|
Bankers Association, who actually came to us last year because |
|
they knew that the Colombian Government was doing nothing |
|
against money laundering, and the Colombian Bankers Association |
|
came to us to ask for training. That helped shame the Colombian |
|
Government into doing things against this, too. That is just an |
|
example. |
|
I mentioned the Flower Growers' Association. There are lots |
|
of other elements in the Colombian private sector and there are |
|
lots of American companies who do business in Colombia who are |
|
also trying to help provide this kind of influence to urge |
|
cleaning up their institutions. We think that is important. |
|
Mr. Schiff. That leads, I think, to the second question and |
|
that is this hearing is very important because it points out, |
|
particularly with the witnesses that will follow, that even in |
|
countries that are on the high end of the list, which Colombia |
|
is among at least the group you have mentioned, there are |
|
individual nationals in those countries, including high-ranking |
|
officials themselves, who don't want to tolerate the |
|
infiltration of crime and corruption---- |
|
Mr. Gelbard. Absolutely. |
|
Mr. Schiff [continuing]. And who at great risk, great |
|
personal risk, wage that fight. We all saw here in Washington, |
|
DC, just a few nights ago, how dangerous it is to be a police |
|
officer in any country; that the threat of death is, again, |
|
another universality, unfortunately. Nevertheless, in Colombia |
|
I understand that thousands of police and antidrug law |
|
enforcement officers have been assassinated in that country, |
|
which demonstrates how many people don't want to tolerate that |
|
situation. |
|
That leads me to what seems, to me, the inconsistency that |
|
you may have explained with the other pressures in Colombian |
|
society. You have spoken well and I think with every |
|
justification of Generals Bedoya and Serrano, and you said that |
|
we were able to influence the appointment of General Serrano as |
|
the head of the police in Colombia. If we believe that General |
|
Samper is closely allied with the criminal elements in |
|
Colombia, frankly, how are we able to do that? |
|
Mr. Gelbard. First, before I answer that, I would like to |
|
just add a point to what you started out talking about. I fully |
|
agree with what you say. I could not agree with you more in |
|
terms of the extraordinary courage of people in the Government |
|
of Colombia and in the private sector of Colombia, who really |
|
have--are extraordinarily patriotic in doing this. But I would |
|
also like to mention the people in our own government who do |
|
this, people in our Embassies in Colombia, Bolivia, Peru, and |
|
other places around the world because it takes extraordinary |
|
courage for those people, including former Ambassador Busby, |
|
who is sitting here, to have lived under threat for extended |
|
periods of time. |
|
As I mentioned earlier, a contract employee of the American |
|
Government was recently killed in Colombia while he was |
|
involved in eradicating coca. I think our own people, as I know |
|
you will agree, sir, deserve equal support. |
|
Mr. Schiff. I am glad you added that, Mr. Ambassador. |
|
Mr. Gelbard. In terms of your question, we have tried--we |
|
have recognized very clearly through the extraordinary step of |
|
the revocation of a sitting democratically elected President's |
|
visa. Revoking a sitting President's visa is, as I said, an |
|
amazing step. The only other case I can think of where this has |
|
been done in memory is Kurt Waldheim. Revocation of visas is |
|
not, one could argue, an enormously important step, but it is a |
|
sign of shame and it is taken as that, because holding an |
|
American visa is important. |
|
We are not going to try to interfere in Colombia's internal |
|
affairs. They elected him. They knew what they were getting. |
|
His record has been clear for decades. What we have tried to |
|
do, though, is establish standards under which we are prepared |
|
to cooperate and support Colombia in many other ways. It is up |
|
to the Colombian people, obviously, to decide how they want to |
|
be ruled, but it is up to us and the rest of the international |
|
community to decide how we are going to deal with those kinds |
|
of individuals. |
|
Mr. Schiff. I have one last question, Mr. Ambassador. |
|
If we could set aside the legalese, I wonder if you could |
|
explain in direct terms what you feel the goal of our policy |
|
should be in terms of the ability for decertification, but then |
|
the recommendation, if I understood you correctly, for a |
|
waiver. I mean, if the President decertifies a country under |
|
the law, but then has a waiver, what then can the President do |
|
and not do? What is the goal you are striving to achieve with |
|
that? |
|
Mr. Gelbard. By decertification, what we are trying to |
|
achieve--we outline in very clear ways to that government in |
|
very explicit terms the measures that we hope they will |
|
undertake to have a cooperative relationship with us. We did |
|
that with Colombia in 1995, in 1996 and we have done it again |
|
this year. |
|
We hold them to certain standards and we ask them to |
|
undertake certain measures and accomplish those measures. Then, |
|
as I said, the test of the law is whether that government is |
|
cooperating with us or whether it is fulfilling the measures of |
|
the 1988 Vienna Convention. |
|
Mr. Hastert. I thank the gentleman. |
|
Mr. Gelbard. The only problems I see in the law right now, |
|
really, are this issue about military assistance, that we would |
|
be--that I would be delighted to have changed and that we |
|
supported. |
|
Similarly, as I mentioned to Congressman Barrett, the |
|
effects, the negative effects, it has on American business. All |
|
our other programs have not only continued, as I say, they have |
|
increased and even doubled. So we are trying to be able to |
|
focus very clearly on our objectives. |
|
Mr. Schiff. Thank you, Mr. Chairman. I yield back. |
|
Mr. Hastert. I thank the gentleman from New Mexico. |
|
Now it is my privilege to introduce the gentleman from |
|
Florida, who has been writing pertinent legislation, one of our |
|
senior Members and he was writing that legislation probably |
|
while many of us were just cutting our teeth on legislation, |
|
that is. Mr. Mica from Florida. |
|
Mr. Mica. Thank you, Mr. Chairman. |
|
Ambassador Gelbard, welcome back. We have been in this |
|
battle, I guess, for more than a decade and a half together and |
|
I appreciate your leadership. |
|
I have some questions, though, today. Maybe I ought to |
|
cover, first, the question of certification and waivers. As you |
|
mentioned, I was active in helping to draft the certification |
|
law and I just had staff check over the evening to see if we |
|
had originally included the waiver when we wrote it, and we did |
|
not. It was added as an amendment in 1988 and it was an |
|
amendment contained in the International Narcotics Control Act |
|
of that year. In fact, it did provide a waiver--I think it is |
|
pretty clear. You said you have had trouble, I guess, with |
|
Justice and DOD attorneys as far as interpretation. |
|
Is that correct? |
|
Mr. Gelbard. Yes, sir. |
|
Mr. Mica. Well, we have had, I think, through this |
|
committee, and the chairman of the full committee wrote back, I |
|
believe it was in November, a request that a waiver be granted, |
|
and no action--I think that went to General McCaffrey--which |
|
disturbs me. |
|
In checking also on waivers that have been granted under |
|
this Section 614 authority, I find waivers have been granted by |
|
the administration to Serbia and Montenegro on almost a half a |
|
dozen occasions; at least twice to Somalia, to Haiti, to |
|
Rwanda. There are two pages of waivers that have been granted. |
|
There seems to be plenty of precedence when, in fact, it is in |
|
the national interest for waivers to be granted. |
|
I can't believe the administration doesn't consider this |
|
instance as in the national interest and has been dragging |
|
their feet. I will provide you with copies of those. That is |
|
the first point. |
|
The second point that concerns me is I see the PR that |
|
Colombia is doing getting ready for their certification |
|
campaign. They have got this ad that is appearing about how we |
|
are well on the way to making drug traffickers suffer as much |
|
as the people they supply. Then they talk about how they are |
|
making them suffer. The pounds of cocaine have--that have been |
|
seized have actually been reduced from 1995 to 1996. The acres |
|
of coca destroyed have actually been reduced from 1995 to 1996. |
|
It sounds like some serious suffering. |
|
What concerns me also is in your testimony you said at the |
|
same time the shift in focus of interdiction operations and |
|
devotion of increased resources to eradication programs, that |
|
is on page 9. So you would think that we had gone from |
|
interdiction--actually interdiction has increased. We have gone |
|
away from interdiction--to eradication. |
|
Page 10, then, you testified, the Colombian coca crop has |
|
expanded over 30 percent last year from 51,000 hectare acres to |
|
67,000 hectare acres. So it seems that the emphasis, area of |
|
emphasis that they are taking is also a failure, eradication |
|
and interdiction. |
|
Is that correct? |
|
Mr. Gelbard. Well, let me respond to several points you |
|
made, Congressman. As you say, you and I have known each other |
|
a long time and I have enormous respect for your background and |
|
experience in these issues. |
|
I have to say that I obviously noticed this media blitz. I |
|
think the timing is clearly geared to certification. |
|
I also noticed this lovely color supplement that is 17 |
|
pages in Forbes Magazine on Colombia called, ``The Leading |
|
Latin American Economy.'' It is a multifaceted economy, |
|
obviously. That costs about $1 million to put that in here, as |
|
we understand it. |
|
What we also understand is that all of these newspaper ads |
|
cost about $252,000. We also understand they have provided |
|
about $2 million to public relations firms around here to |
|
improve their image. I think what Colombia ought to be focusing |
|
on are accomplishments instead of their image. |
|
Some of that money perhaps could have been added to the |
|
military and the police, instead of reducing their budgets, and |
|
I think that would have been for the good of the Colombian |
|
people and the international community. |
|
Mr. Mica. Well, the information you have provided, the |
|
information I have, shows that both interdiction is down and |
|
eradication is down. |
|
Mr. Gelbard. Well, the interdiction results have decreased. |
|
As you said--I, too, noticed that in these ads, I was surprised |
|
that they show--that they would take out full page ads to show |
|
that the results have gotten worse. That is amazing. |
|
Mr. Mica. Well, the whole thing is alarming, Mr. |
|
Ambassador. |
|
The other ad that they don't see is the headlines that I |
|
see in my district, and I have held this up before. When we |
|
were in--when we were in Colombia, Mr. Hastert, Mr. Souder and |
|
others, we were told that there are 10,000 hectare acres now of |
|
heroin growing, that heroin will be cheaper on the streets of |
|
our cities than cocaine in short order. This is what is |
|
happening in my central Florida suburban area. We are not |
|
talking about urban ghettos of Detroit, New York, Los Angeles. |
|
So I am not interested--we are not interested in PR. We are |
|
interested in some action also. |
|
Mr. Gelbard. I understand. Let me say, on opium poppies, I |
|
think the area under cultivation, we have just completed our |
|
survey and I mentioned the coca crop up 32 percent. We think |
|
the opium poppy crop is about 6,300 hectares, which is a slight |
|
increase over the past. |
|
However, you are absolutely right, Congressman, because |
|
almost all of the heroin that is being produced in Colombia is |
|
coming to the United States. The Cali Cartel has now used the |
|
same mechanisms that it has used to distribute cocaine for |
|
distributing heroin. They are using loss leaders to sell heroin |
|
at very high purity levels at a very low price and they have |
|
taken ownership of the heroin distribution all through the East |
|
Coast. |
|
When I talk to the DEA in New York, in Baltimore, in |
|
Philadelphia and other places in the East Coast, Hartford, you |
|
can't find Southeast Asia heroin on the streets of those cities |
|
anymore. It is Colombian heroin. That shows that it has |
|
continued to increase even while--the police have made strong |
|
efforts. The military are making strong efforts. But absent the |
|
kind of governmental support that we were discussing, |
|
Congressman, earlier, absent the framework of laws, absent |
|
other kinds of support, they are going to be--they are going to |
|
be able to continue to pump this stuff out. |
|
We have only now been able to negotiate a maritime |
|
interdiction agreement, and we have seen a significant shift in |
|
the use of ships from airplanes as a way of getting drugs to |
|
our shores now and to Europe, where there is a significant |
|
increase, too, in cocaine and heroin coming from Colombia. |
|
Mr. Mica. I have other questions but my time has expired. |
|
We will get back. Thank you. |
|
Mr. Hastert. I will advise the gentleman, we will come back |
|
for a second round to anyone who may have another question or a |
|
round of questions. |
|
I just have a quick followup question or observation on |
|
this. On a couple of statistics that we have been throwing back |
|
and forth here today, basically, you have said that the |
|
interdiction is down of drugs coming out of Colombia, and one |
|
of the reasons that some people have said that is because we |
|
have been doing more spraying and the Colombians have been more |
|
effective at killing hectares of cocaine. |
|
Also, it was interesting to see that some people predicted |
|
the amount of cocaine moving out of Colombia is actually up, no |
|
matter what the interdiction is. That also is explained by some |
|
folks that there has actually been a huge decrease in the |
|
amount of cocaine or coca paste coming up from Peru because of |
|
the success of the air bridge, and that is no longer a |
|
dependable market or at least as dependable as it was. So the |
|
narcotraffickers are really concentrating on growing their own |
|
crop in a sense. Is that valid? |
|
Mr. Gelbard. You are absolutely right on Peru. It is a |
|
combination of the support we have given to the Peruvian |
|
military and police on interdiction and law enforcement on the |
|
one hand and the support we have given to--we and other nations |
|
have given to Peru for alternative development on the other. |
|
The price of coca went way down. We are providing funds for |
|
other livelihoods and people are literally walking off the |
|
land. So there is an 18 percent decrease nationwide. |
|
In Colombia, I don't think there has been a real shift from |
|
interdiction to eradication. There has been a significant |
|
increase in eradication efforts, but interdiction and law |
|
enforcement efforts have continued. |
|
The problem has been, I think, overall corruption. Once |
|
again, the statistics are not ours. These are statistics |
|
provided by the Colombian Government themselves. |
|
Mr. Hastert. Thank you, Ambassador. |
|
The next gentleman I would like to introduce is certainly |
|
somebody who has distinguished himself on this panel and |
|
others, the gentleman from Georgia, Mr. Barr. |
|
Mr. Barr. Thank you, Mr. Chairman. |
|
Mr. Ambassador, I don't really necessarily have any problem |
|
with the administration's decision last year on |
|
decertification, and I have heard your testimony today and have |
|
read a great deal of material and I think it is admirable that |
|
this administration has reached the conclusion that campaign |
|
financing scandals involving foreign leaders are very serious |
|
matters, worthy of very extraordinary action, even hampering |
|
our war against drugs by cutting off certain types of |
|
assistance and taking the extraordinary step of denying a visa |
|
to a leader of a foreign country because of a campaign |
|
financing scandal. But I am somewhat concerned about what |
|
appears to be inconsistencies in the way the administration is |
|
approaching these matters and in particular some |
|
inconsistencies that appear to me certainly to be |
|
inconsistencies with regard to the International Narcotics |
|
Control Strategy Reports, or INCSR. |
|
For example, I know under that process, and pursuant to the |
|
law, Colombia and Mexico, among many other countries, fall into |
|
the very same categories of major drug producing and drug |
|
transit countries. Both Colombia and Mexico fall under the same |
|
categories as major money-laundering countries, yet the action |
|
of this administration last year, in terms of the extraordinary |
|
step of decertifying and then not even applying for a waiver |
|
and, as my distinguished colleague from Florida has said, |
|
waivers have been requested in, I think, far less important |
|
circumstances, that is, if the administration places |
|
counternarcotics activities at a high priority. Yet, with |
|
regard to looking at Colombia and Mexico, for example, which |
|
have a great deal in common in terms of the pervasive |
|
corruption in their societies and in terms of their preeminent |
|
role in sending drugs into this country, action was taken last |
|
year only against Colombia and not against Mexico. |
|
I don't know whether this has anything to do with the money |
|
that we have extended to Mexico--and I am glad that the |
|
President highlighted in his State of the Union that they |
|
repaid us in record time or something--but the fact of the |
|
matter is, I think Mexico does not have a great deal to be |
|
proud about and I think that this administration ought to be |
|
doing more to talk not so much about Mexico paying us back in |
|
record time for money extended to them, that a number of us |
|
think we had no right to do anyway, with Mexico's increasingly |
|
sorry record of corruption and direct massive involvement in |
|
sending drugs into this country. |
|
I would like your explanation of why action was taken |
|
against Colombia in terms of decertifying them and not against |
|
Mexico. Second, I would appreciate, again, an explanation of |
|
something that a couple of the other members of the panel have |
|
touched on, and that is why the administration has failed to |
|
take advantage of the very, very broad authority that I presume |
|
lawyers on your staff, and I know you are very familiar with, |
|
under, for example, 22 U.S.C. Section 2364. It is very broad |
|
authority for the President to, simply by notifying the |
|
specified Members of Congress of his intention, very, very |
|
broad authority to continue or expand military assistance, |
|
which is, as you said, to these countries that can be used for |
|
eradication and counternarcotics efforts, why the |
|
administration has not sought to take advantage of that. |
|
Obviously, they are aware of it, because it is a |
|
longstanding statute provision, the waiver provision, going |
|
back 36 years. There were two Members of this Congress last |
|
year that wrote to General McCaffrey specifically requesting |
|
that that action take place. |
|
Mr. Gelbard. I know nobody here is going to sit and |
|
question the decision of the President to have decertified |
|
Colombia led by a clearly corrupt President who has had a |
|
history of involvement with drug traffickers, of soliciting and |
|
receiving drug money going back to 1982, a clear history, no |
|
question. All of the information is out there. |
|
I personally sat down with then Candidate Samper in |
|
November 1993, and told him we had exquisite intelligence which |
|
indicated from lots and lots of sources, now out in the public |
|
domain, that he and his associates were soliciting and |
|
receiving drug funds for their campaign. He denied it, of |
|
course. |
|
I told him he needed to stop right then, because we would |
|
know if it continued and the relationship with him, if it |
|
continued and he were elected President, would be bad. |
|
He went back to Colombia and it continued. The proof is out |
|
there now about soliciting and receiving more than $6.6 million |
|
in drug funds. We have seen the consequences. |
|
The President took the decision to decertify Colombia, a |
|
very important decision based on the test of the law, which was |
|
whether the government was cooperating with us. The government |
|
was not cooperating with us. |
|
The test of the law was also applied in the case of Mexico |
|
and the President believed, and I believe, that President |
|
Zedillo was cooperating with us. |
|
The President hasn't made his decisions for this year for |
|
1996. That will come out toward the end of this month. But |
|
there have been clear-cut cases, examples of progress in terms |
|
of our cooperation with Mexico during President Zedillo's |
|
administration. |
|
The lack of institutional capabilities in Mexico, I think, |
|
were fairly clear compared to Colombia. We have a strong, |
|
honest police with strong, dedicated, honest leadership. |
|
Mr. Barr. In Mexico? |
|
Mr. Gelbard. In Colombia. |
|
Mr. Barr. OK. Good. |
|
Mr. Gelbard. We have the same in the Prosecutor General's |
|
Office. We now have in General Bedoya, a serious, honest person |
|
who wants to work with us in closer ways than ever before on |
|
counternarcotics and, as I mentioned, for that reason we have |
|
taken the step of now allocating funds directed to the armed |
|
forces for the first time out of my budget. |
|
President Zedillo and many of his ministers have now been |
|
trying to push for much better results in Mexico, and over the |
|
course of 1996, I think, we have already seen some dramatic |
|
changes. |
|
For example--and, Congressman, knowing your distinguished |
|
record as a prosecutor, you would understand this--they have, |
|
for the first time, started extraditing their own nationals, |
|
without precedent. They deported to the United States Juan |
|
Garcia Abrego, who I mentioned earlier, who has now received, |
|
as I mentioned, 11 life terms and many others. These are very |
|
important, unprecedented steps. |
|
We have begun cooperation with Mexico in counternarcotics |
|
with their army and we are seeing very strong, positive results |
|
as a result of that military-to-military cooperation, now |
|
engaged in interdiction as they had already been engaged in |
|
eradication. |
|
We are seeing seizures up significantly in Mexico as a |
|
result of cooperation that we have with the Army, with the Air |
|
Force and with certain police elements. |
|
They have now passed a major money-laundering law for the |
|
first time and they have implemented it and already making |
|
cases. They have passed an organized crime law, modernizing the |
|
tools that you, as a former prosecutor, are familiar with, that |
|
in most countries are novel ideas, such as allowing evidence |
|
from wiring tapping that is court authorized to be used in a |
|
court of law, which had not been allowed before. |
|
Arrests are up of drug traffickers, arrests are up--both |
|
domestic and foreigners who are in the country. Seizures are up |
|
of heroin. They are up something like 79 percent in Mexico. |
|
Seizures of cocaine are up. |
|
So we think there has been progress under President |
|
Zedillo, but in terms of the contrast--and I obviously can't |
|
predict where the President is going to come out on |
|
certification. In fact, the recommendations haven't even gone |
|
to him yet. |
|
Mr. Barr. The second question that I had, please, about why |
|
the President has not sought the waiver and what---- |
|
Mr. Gelbard. First, what we did--what we were--what we did |
|
concur with were the efforts in the House International |
|
Relations Committee to get an amendment to the law to permit |
|
this. As I said earlier, unfortunately, the Congress failed to |
|
pass that amendment, and I regret that. |
|
Mr. Barr. I am talking about the existing law. |
|
Mr. Gelbard. I am talking about the existing law--of trying |
|
to change the existing law about prohibition on FMF and FMS. We |
|
have been working with the issue of a 614 waiver. I also know |
|
that the Congress in the past has criticized the administration |
|
for over use of the 614 waiver. |
|
So we do hope to be able to provide assistance to the |
|
military. But once again, this is a relatively small part of |
|
overall assistance to Colombia. The more important issue, I |
|
think, is that we, through my budget, which is the main source |
|
of funds far and away to Colombia, are going to be providing |
|
this year equipment and support worth $147.8 million to |
|
Colombia. That is an extraordinary amount. |
|
Mr. Barr. But why hasn't the administration sought the--and |
|
I maybe disagree with you. I think the waiver in 22 U.S. 2364 |
|
is very broad. Why hasn't the administration used that as a |
|
tool to get assistance directly to the military and the police |
|
in Colombia? |
|
Mr. Gelbard. Assistance to the police has gone through. |
|
Mr. Hastert. I think we will come back with a second round |
|
and be able to ask those questions. |
|
Mr. Barr. OK. |
|
Mr. Hastert. The gentleman from Ohio. |
|
Mr. LaTourette. Thank you, Mr. Chairman. Thank you for |
|
having this hearing. |
|
Mr. Ambassador, in preparing for this hearing I was struck |
|
by some of the strength of the remarks made by various |
|
officials in our government about President Samper. In your |
|
testimony on page 4 and again you repeated it, I think, in |
|
questioning with Mr. Barr, that you reached the conclusion that |
|
the President has aided and abetted drug traffickers and that |
|
led to, in part, to the decision to revoke his visa. |
|
I was reading an observation by our Drug Czar, I think our |
|
new national Drug Czar, Drug Policy Director, Mr. McCaffrey, |
|
who indicated that he has been--the President has been |
|
complicit with international criminals. I think even our |
|
Ambassador to that country made the observation that although |
|
he says all sorts of things, he has done very little and he has |
|
no friends in Washington. |
|
As someone who is coming to this committee afresh, I have |
|
read and I have heard you say today that there is an |
|
observation that $6.6 million found its way apparently into |
|
President Samper's campaign coffers from drug traffickers. I |
|
have heard you--I hadn't read it before, but I heard you say |
|
for the first time that apparently you have uncovered a history |
|
of that type of transaction since 1982. |
|
Is it the conclusion of the administration that the |
|
acceptance of these funds from questionable characters equals |
|
he must be complicit and therefore coddling or caving into drug |
|
traffickers, narcotraffickers, or is there additional evidence |
|
that that is, in fact, the case? |
|
I guess what I am getting at is, I suppose one could make |
|
the argument that he has accepted a campaign contribution. He |
|
wrote a letter to Congress saying that he would do certain |
|
things; he didn't do it. Therefore, it must be the campaign |
|
contribution equaled he didn't get the money laundering |
|
statutes passed through his Congress. Or is there other |
|
evidence that you are familiar with that leads you to that |
|
conclusion? |
|
Mr. Gelbard. The Cali Cartel has never been known to have |
|
provided support without a quid pro quo. We believe that there |
|
are--there is information which causes us to believe that there |
|
were direct consequences of the receipt of these funds. |
|
Mr. LaTourette. OK. I think that is an important--at least |
|
to me, it is an important question, because I don't think that |
|
you would argue that merely, as Mr. Barr, I think, was asking |
|
you, the mere acceptance of campaign contributions from people |
|
of questionable character equals that you do what they want you |
|
to do in contravention to the best interest of your Nation, |
|
certainly. |
|
Mr. Gelbard. The President made the decision to revoke the |
|
visa under a provision of the law which deals with individuals |
|
who aid and abet drug traffickers. |
|
Mr. LaTourette. OK. If I could fast forward now to the |
|
present day, and I was very interested in Mr. Mica's |
|
questioning and also your showing us the Forbes Magazine piece. |
|
I don't think there is anything wrong with a country promoting |
|
itself and saying that it is a nice place to visit, has a |
|
strong economy. But there have been other things in the news |
|
recently. In particular I was interested in a raid that |
|
apparently occurred down at the end of January in Colombia at a |
|
drug manufacturing center, and I have observed two spins put on |
|
that. |
|
One is that it was a huge distribution or manufacturing |
|
center that could have supplied up to half the manufactured |
|
cocaine down in Colombia on an annual basis. I have also read |
|
sort of a sarcastic piece that says, well, they knew about it |
|
for a long time and they waited until the recertification |
|
decision was coming up here in the United States in March and |
|
that is when they sprung it. |
|
Do you have an observation as to whether this is window |
|
dressing or whether or not this is evidence of increased and |
|
enhanced drug enforcement activities and the redoubling of the |
|
effort by the Colombian Government? |
|
Mr. Gelbard. I don't believe that the Colombian police or |
|
the Colombian Army or the Colombian Air Force would undertake a |
|
laboratory raid because of any proximity to certification. We |
|
have a great deal of trust in them and their leadership and |
|
that is why we work with them so closely. But I think this goes |
|
to, in fact, part of my own experience. |
|
I was Ambassador to Bolivia when during part of that time-- |
|
this goes to also some of your questioning, Congressman--we had |
|
a President then in Bolivia, Jaime Paz Zamora, who had been |
|
corrupted by the drug traffickers, and his visa was also |
|
revoked, by the way. |
|
We were working very closely with the Bolivian police and |
|
Bolivian Air Force on some significant counternarcotics |
|
achievements, on a separate track from what the government |
|
itself was doing and the governmental leadership, and it is |
|
possible to do that. |
|
We have a very close collaborative relationship with the |
|
police, the Army, the Prosecutor General's Office. |
|
Mr. LaTourette. Likewise, I assume the activity that |
|
occurred maybe a week ago, I understand there was an 11-city |
|
sweep that occurred down in Colombia relative to rooting out |
|
suspected trafficking activity, that you would put in the same |
|
category? |
|
Mr. Gelbard. Well, what I would say is that, as I mentioned |
|
earlier, I don't think it is a coincidence that suddenly the |
|
government has moved at the end of December to get the asset |
|
forfeiture law passed; that suddenly we have seen them |
|
initial--agree and initial the maritime interdiction agreement, |
|
which we have been pursuing for a few years; that suddenly they |
|
are having an extraordinary session of their Congress next week |
|
to try to discuss a sentencing law. |
|
We happily will take the results. They are important |
|
results. But the timing isn't coincidental. |
|
Mr. LaTourette. That was what I was going to ask you. |
|
Although you may question their timing, you consider them to be |
|
significant progress on the part of the Colombian Government? |
|
Mr. Gelbard. On those issues, once again, I think the |
|
certification process helps. |
|
Mr. LaTourette. OK. If I could just ask you a technical |
|
question relative--on the extradition question. Am I correct in |
|
my understanding that in order for Colombia to modify their |
|
policy on extradition there would have to be a change to their |
|
constitution? Am I correct on that? |
|
Mr. Gelbard. There are two interpretations. There is one |
|
school of thought which says they have to modify the 1991 |
|
constitution and in that case, the Cali Cartel clearly was able |
|
to buy enough votes in the constitutional convention to exclude |
|
that. |
|
There is another school of thought which says that the |
|
bilateral--the treaty we have with Colombia, which I think is |
|
the 1979 treaty, would override the constitutional provision |
|
and that apparently is going to be taken to the highest court |
|
in Colombia soon. |
|
Mr. LaTourette. Thank you, Mr. Ambassador. |
|
Thank you, Mr. Chairman. |
|
Mr. Gelbard. Thank you, sir. |
|
Mr. Hastert. A couple of quick questions and then I think |
|
we will go on a round of quick followup questions, if we could. |
|
Mr. Ambassador, one of the obvious things of the whole drug |
|
war, multinational drug war, you can grow coca leaf, turn it |
|
into paste, transport it, remanufacture it into cocaine, crack; |
|
same with heroin, and the poppy and the heroin. It comes in-- |
|
most of it at least comes into this country wholesale, |
|
retailed, retailed again, sold on the street, literally |
|
multiplying its value not by tens or by hundreds but by |
|
thousands, sometimes millions of factors. |
|
That money--in order for all that work to be done, there is |
|
no value in all of that movement unless the money comes back to |
|
the person who is in charge. Money laundering probably is one |
|
of the--is the tie to this. What nation in the world is No. 1 |
|
in money laundering? Can you give me a crack at that. |
|
Mr. Gelbard. The United States. |
|
Mr. Hastert. What country is No. 2? |
|
Mr. Gelbard. Hard to say. Let me say, I fully agree with |
|
you. This is why we have tried to put major emphasis on a money |
|
laundering initiative that is included in Presidential |
|
Directive 42 on international crime. |
|
We have tried now to marshal all of our resources in the |
|
U.S. Government through Treasury, Federal Reserve, Justice, and |
|
the State Department and others, to work with countries to put |
|
major emphasis on antimoney laundering, much more than ever |
|
before. |
|
Secretary Rubin, in fact, chaired a little over a year ago |
|
a hemispheric conference on money laundering and we are |
|
pressing governments such as Colombia to take the strongest |
|
possible action. |
|
An example of Samper's cynicism was at the Miami |
|
Hemispheric Summit, where he called for a hemispheric |
|
convention on money laundering and Colombia hadn't even |
|
criminalized money laundering yet. |
|
They subsequently passed a weak money laundering law. We |
|
are now pressing them to toughen that law and then to take |
|
other measures. |
|
We are doing the same with other governments in the region, |
|
whether they are large governments, such as Venezuela, Mexico, |
|
which, as I say, has now adopted a tough money laundering law. |
|
Or even small Caribbean countries which are used as centers for |
|
dirty money, such as Antigua. But we are doing the same also |
|
around the world, and this has been a Presidential initiative. |
|
Mr. Hastert. In fact, the United States is No. 1. Mexico is |
|
probably No. 2. Panama is probably No. 3 and, you know, |
|
Colombia is down there No. 4 or 5 or 6, which doesn't validate |
|
anybody or give them a license. |
|
The fact is, all the money comes into this country and we |
|
are doing a very poor job, because the money--drugs wouldn't |
|
come into this country unless the money could flow out again. I |
|
think one of the emphases that I would say that this Congress |
|
ought to do is take a look at how we can make our laws better |
|
and enforce those laws. |
|
Mr. Gelbard. Can I say, I agree with you. What's happening, |
|
though, when I talk to DEA and other law enforcement |
|
organizations, which work inside the United States, what they |
|
are telling me is now the tough--there are very tough |
|
antimoney-laundering laws in the United States and enforcement |
|
has been dramatic. The result is that drug traffickers are now |
|
shipping their money out by--in cash and they are shipping it |
|
out in containers. |
|
Jim Milford, who is now the Deputy Administrator of the DEA |
|
and was previously the head of their Miami office, has told me |
|
about seizures of tens of millions of dollars that they have |
|
picked up in Miami of money going out of the country on its way |
|
back to Colombia. We have got to be able--the hard part is |
|
getting a handle on those containers. That is very hard. |
|
Mr. Hastert. We even had testimony that, as a matter of |
|
fact, it is more difficult to pack street dollars, street cash |
|
into those containers; it takes more container volume than the |
|
drugs that come in on them. |
|
Mr. Gelbard. The other thing, if I could say, sir, is that |
|
we have been working for a number of years, since the Financial |
|
Action Task Force, which is the multilateral organization that |
|
deals with this, based in Paris, which was set up a number of |
|
years ago, to try to establish international standards against |
|
money laundering. We and some of our allies in Europe and Japan |
|
have been working together to urge countries such as Colombia, |
|
Mexico, Panama and others, including the European countries |
|
such as Austria, which has never ratified the Vienna |
|
Convention, to take strong action on money laundering. |
|
Mr. Hastert. I have one quick question before my round is |
|
up here. During our period of time on decertification, the |
|
Colombian military and police continue to fly excess United |
|
States Huey helicopters. Five of them were shot out of the sky |
|
by the narcotraffickers and guerilla armies. It took the |
|
administration about 6 months to replace these excess |
|
helicopters, based chiefly on trying to get legal opinions |
|
whether it was right or wrong during this period of time. |
|
Just as there have been sometimes delays of months in |
|
trying to find spare parts to make the DC-3s fly, which got |
|
materials out into the jungles, and also the herbicides that |
|
were needed, we also delayed the delivery of the Blackhawk |
|
helicopters. I am not even sure they are on the shores of |
|
Colombia yet. This has all happened since basically the |
|
decertification of Colombia. |
|
In view of the numbers of Americans dying from violence on |
|
American streets because, in part, this happens, how can we |
|
expect that not to happen again? |
|
Mr. Gelbard. First of all, that had nothing to do with |
|
certification. The Blackhawk transaction is a commercial |
|
transaction and, in fact, we and the Pentagon got Sikorsky to |
|
agree to jump Colombia to the front of the line to get their |
|
helicopters. The first helicopters are, in fact, arriving |
|
tomorrow in Colombia. |
|
Second, last year we provided 12 more helicopters, 12 Huey |
|
helicopters to them. We have provided three Bell-212 |
|
helicopters and are about to provide three more. |
|
We have given them all the spray planes we have got |
|
worldwide. As I mentioned, we have lost two, one to ground fire |
|
and one when tragically an American pilot crashed. We are about |
|
to provide five more OV-10 Bronco aircraft; two this month, |
|
three by the end of March. We will be providing 12 more Huey |
|
helicopters within the next month or so. So we feel we are |
|
moving this as rapidly as we can and as rapidly as their |
|
absorptive capacity can handle. |
|
I would point out that the operating rate in Colombia for |
|
aircraft is lower. It is about 65 percent. It is lower than we |
|
have in Peru and Bolivia, about 85 percent. So it is not just a |
|
question of pumping equipment in. It is also a question of |
|
maintaining that equipment well and being able to use the spare |
|
parts. |
|
Mr. Hastert. Getting the spare parts there? |
|
Mr. Gelbard. We have provided $4 million in spare parts |
|
this last year, too. Thank you. |
|
Mr. Barrett. During the course of this conversation this |
|
morning, we have heard you praise the political leadership in |
|
Mexico, but not have such great praise for the military or |
|
police in Mexico and, in contrast, in Colombia there has been |
|
strong praise here for the police and military, but obviously |
|
no praise at all for the political leadership. |
|
Can you site some examples where some of the higher regions |
|
of the government and Colombia has undermined the hard-working |
|
efforts of the police and the military? |
|
Mr. Gelbard. I think the primary examples would rest in |
|
cutting their budget, first of all. |
|
Mr. Barrett. How much is the budget? |
|
Mr. Gelbard. I don't have any answers on that, but I would |
|
suggest you might want to ask General Bedoya about that. But |
|
one would think that if, as even President Samper says, the |
|
fight against the guerilla terrorists and the fight against |
|
drug trafficking are as high priorities as he says they are, |
|
then their budget would go up, the way ours did. |
|
Second, they did nothing to try to move expeditiously on a |
|
new sentencing law that was promised almost 3 years ago. That |
|
would, I think, have helped enormously in terms of not just the |
|
morale, but the rule of law for the police, who had superb |
|
performance in capturing the leadership of the Cali Cartel. So |
|
here they captured all of these people, but then they were |
|
brought to jail and, as I said earlier, they have received |
|
ridiculous sentences; no forfeited assets because the law was |
|
just passed now. |
|
Money laundering, the money-laundering law that was finally |
|
passed was weak and the government made no effort to make it a |
|
serious law. |
|
The kind of stringent anticorruption legislation, and those |
|
are President Samper's words, that he promised has never been |
|
presented, and on and on. |
|
Meanwhile, a very interesting example is the cooperation |
|
between the Minister of Interior and a German citizen, an |
|
apparent German espionage agent, named Werner Mauss. They were |
|
apparently looking to have the German Government, which |
|
ultimately refused, broker a deal for the Cali Cartel, which |
|
would have resulted in them getting off scot free and keeping |
|
20 percent of their assets. That is an amazing example. |
|
This man, Mauss, working with the Interior Minister, was |
|
also trying to corrupt the contracting process and hurting |
|
American companies and was also trying to make deals with the |
|
guerrillas. He was trying to free German hostages, but he was |
|
getting the ransom raised and getting a percentage of that. |
|
That endangered the lives of American citizens who were held |
|
hostage. |
|
So this is all part of what the government and President |
|
Samper have been doing. |
|
Mr. Barrett. OK. Thank you. |
|
We have heard some criticism of the administration's |
|
actions today, but I don't think we have heard any criticism of |
|
the decision to pull the visa of President Samper. |
|
Is there a way to turn the heat up even more? Have you |
|
considered pulling his diplomatic visa? Is that something that |
|
could be considered? What is the next way to put the spotlight |
|
or keep the spotlight on him? |
|
Mr. Gelbard. We have revoked the visas of a large number of |
|
Colombian Government officials, of ministers or former |
|
ministers, Members of Congress. We have frozen the assets, as I |
|
say, of a lot of the front companies. |
|
We have considered other measures and are considering other |
|
measures, but I would rather not get into them today. |
|
Let me also add, though, that I think it is not coincidence |
|
at all that when Secretary Albright recently presented our |
|
human rights report, Colombia was clearly targeted as one of |
|
the leading offenders. One of the examples that we have looked |
|
to is the fact that President Samper has also put into place a |
|
very harsh censorship law against the press and I think that is |
|
another example of this overall atmosphere we have seen. But we |
|
are considering others--other measures. |
|
Mr. Barrett. I am glad you mentioned the human rights |
|
concerns because that is something we haven't talked about this |
|
morning. In your analysis, where have the majority of the human |
|
rights violations occurred, by government officials? |
|
Specifically, where are we seeing the human rights violations |
|
in Colombia? |
|
Mr. Gelbard. We have been very concerned, as have |
|
nongovernmental organizations, by human rights problems, |
|
particularly through the military. |
|
General Bedoya, I think, has been making a major effort, as |
|
did the former Minister of Defense and now Ambassador in |
|
Washington, Esguerra, to try to improve that situation. In |
|
fact, General Bedoya and I discussed that issue yesterday. We |
|
feel that General Bedoya is making serious efforts on this |
|
problem. |
|
I have to say, though, that there is no question that the |
|
real human rights problem has also been at the same time what |
|
the guerilla terrorist groups have also been undertaking, the |
|
FARC, ELN and other groups. They have kidnapped foreigners and |
|
their own citizens. They have murdered hundreds upon hundreds |
|
of other people. Once again, we think the institutions are |
|
trying to make improvement. We regret very deeply that |
|
President Samper is trying to curtail press freedom and we have |
|
spoken out quite strongly about that. |
|
The Congress of the United States, in its last session, |
|
approved a new law called the Leahy amendment, under which |
|
funds from our budget have to take into account human rights |
|
elements. We are stringently, of course, obeying that law and |
|
are working very closely with the Colombian Government to |
|
assure that our assistance takes into account all appropriate |
|
and serious violations. |
|
Mr. Barrett. So you have drawn up lists of offending units |
|
or you will be drawing up lists? |
|
Mr. Gelbard. Sorry? |
|
Mr. Barrett. Have you drawn up lists, then, of offending |
|
units or will you be doing that? |
|
Mr. Gelbard. Ambassador Frechette has been working very |
|
closely with General Bedoya and the new Minister of Defense on |
|
this issue, yes. |
|
Mr. Barrett. OK. Thank you. |
|
Mr. Hastert. A quick followup. You mentioned press |
|
censorship. One of the things we try to do here is to try to |
|
keep updated on what is going on in Colombia from the Colombia |
|
press. One of the major papers, El Tiempo, that comes out of |
|
Colombia, apparently, at least, in our reading, doesn't say-- |
|
they seem to be speaking out quite bravely on a lot of issues |
|
and it really doesn't seem that there has been a lot of |
|
censorship, at least in our view of this. Any comment on that? |
|
Do you think El Tiempo, for instance, has been severely |
|
hampered? |
|
Mr. Gelbard. El Tiempo is very brave. El Espectador and |
|
others have taken very strong stands. The censorship law, if I |
|
remember correctly, is particularly directed at television and |
|
radio and the idea is that their licenses can be revoked. |
|
Mr. Hastert. OK. That narrows that down. |
|
Mr. Gelbard. Yes. |
|
Mr. Hastert. Significantly. |
|
Mr. Souder. I want to restate the obvious here before I |
|
start out, and that is that none of us have any interest in |
|
defending the actions of the President of Colombia. Partly in |
|
discussions with you, when we went down there, we didn't meet |
|
with him. We met with President Zedillo and others. |
|
At the same time, one of our obligations--and, quite |
|
frankly, I find this whole advertising campaign very insulting, |
|
about how we make decisions here, and they got pretty bad PR |
|
advice, that--but one of our jobs here is to make sure that |
|
there is fairness. We want to make sure that Colombia isn't |
|
just being used as a whipping boy solely when the problem is |
|
far beyond that. |
|
I want to sort through one of the difficult issues that |
|
faces us in almost all these nations, and that is the problem |
|
of the mixing, as President Zedillo told us, of narcoterrorists |
|
and, in fact, the revolutionary movements in those countries |
|
and how the different governments can deal with that. |
|
For example, we get mixed up in the human rights questions |
|
and the narcotics questions and the revolutionary groups, and |
|
those things are not separated from each other. Often, the |
|
human rights restrictions that--so, for example, we have had |
|
problems with President Fujimori in the past; and when you |
|
shoot down airplanes you aren't necessarily reading the Miranda |
|
rights as you are shooting down the airplanes, although they |
|
make some attempts to do that; that in Burma we have a problem |
|
there both in the electoral process but also, up in the |
|
northern part of Burma, in trying to get cooperation. |
|
When we cutoff any relations, we are having trouble getting |
|
control. You see it going into the Yunnan province in China |
|
and--because of the Muslims there. It is not even clear that |
|
the National Government of China can control that. |
|
In Mexico, we have corruption down at the regional levels |
|
and in their police departments, and Zedillo is concerned that |
|
that is going to be a revolutionary--tied in with the |
|
revolutionary movements. |
|
The question comes as to how are you distinguishing--and |
|
let me put this in a provocative way. Is some of the reason we |
|
are isolating Colombia, which--clearly, we have seen the movie |
|
Clear and Present Danger. Ambassador Busby, I think, made the |
|
funniest statement when we were there, which was, I asked him |
|
how accurate the movie was; and he said, very accurate, except |
|
I died in the movie. |
|
While we see that and it is easy to focus on Colombia, we |
|
need to make sure that the only reason we aren't isolating |
|
Colombia is that flowers and coffee may not be as potent as the |
|
trade that we want to do with China or Mexico and that we |
|
balance--and I want to see an even type of approach to all of |
|
these different countries. |
|
I would like you, in particular, to comment on how you see |
|
the drug trafficking and the revolutionary movements and the |
|
human rights mixing in four of the most explosive and major |
|
drug areas of the world: Peru, Colombia, Burma and Mexico. |
|
Mr. Gelbard. Nobody is picking on Colombia, Congressman. |
|
Mr. Souder. They deserve being picked on. The question is |
|
on being isolated. |
|
Mr. Gelbard. I am disliked in lots of places around the |
|
world. We have--this hearing happens to be on Colombia. If this |
|
hearing were on Nigeria, you would hear me say the same things |
|
but maybe more. If this hearing were on Burma, you would hear |
|
me saying the same things about the SLORC; and I will talk a |
|
little bit about that, if you would like. |
|
Mr. Souder. OK. What about Mexico and China? |
|
Mr. Gelbard. We feel very strongly--I am not sure how much |
|
the Mexicans like me, either. |
|
My job relates to trying to develop stronger |
|
counternarcotics cooperation and results worldwide. I feel very |
|
strongly about it. This is not the easiest job in the world, |
|
obviously; and it is sure not the most enjoyable. |
|
We have taken a very strong stand on these issues |
|
worldwide, worldwide. When I came into this job, and knowing |
|
that Congressman Mica was now a Member of Congress and would be |
|
watching me very carefully, I looked at the certification law |
|
and I said that as long as I am the person responsible for |
|
managing this, I am going to take this very seriously. We have |
|
seen--I think if you examine the results, you will see that |
|
there has been a significant change in the way that this |
|
administration has dealt with certification, has dealt with |
|
money laundering, has dealt with a whole range of these issues |
|
than ever before. |
|
We are, obviously, concerned about trying to work a balance |
|
on many of these issues. If you read through the various laws-- |
|
and we have to be guided by the letter and the spirit of the |
|
laws--there are often conflicts in the laws, and there are |
|
often conflicts among Members of Congress as they interpret the |
|
laws. |
|
I am tremendously concerned, for example, about the fact |
|
that an enormous amount of heroin that comes into the United |
|
States comes from Burma, as are you. But there are also Members |
|
of Congress who are very concerned about impeding our ability |
|
to deal with that problem. |
|
What I am trying to do is work with the United Nations Drug |
|
Control Program, through that kind of program, to develop a |
|
program with integrity to deal with eradicating opium poppies |
|
and having crop substitution, particularly in the Wa area. I |
|
have been in the Yunnan province in China. I have spent a lot |
|
of time with the Chinese authorities and with others. We also |
|
see an enormous amount of corruption in the SLORC and in lots |
|
of other places in Burma. |
|
In Colombia, we have been trying to develop serious |
|
programs to deal with the ever-increasing problem, the overlay |
|
between the guerilla terrorist movements, drug trafficking and, |
|
increasingly, cultivation. |
|
The phenomenon of the involvement of the guerilla terrorist |
|
groups in drugs isn't new. In 1985, when I became involved with |
|
this for the first time professionally, it was quite apparent |
|
then. The FARC at that time were guarding drug laboratories and |
|
benefiting from it. The M-19 at that time apparently was on |
|
contract from the Medellin Cartel when they murdered a large |
|
number of members of the Colombian Supreme Court. |
|
This is--but the law also says that any assistance from my |
|
budget has to go 100 percent against drug trafficking. It can't |
|
be used for multiple purposes. But this--this is what General |
|
Bedoya and General Serrano and I were discussing just last |
|
night, how we can work together in certain regions of Colombia |
|
where it's clear that the guerrilla terrorist groups are |
|
involved very clearly in drug trafficking, in cultivation, |
|
protecting cultivation, and we can have programs that will |
|
fully be in concurrence with American law. We had some detailed |
|
discussions about that last night. |
|
That is also why we have now explicitly put $5 million in |
|
our budget specifically for the military of Colombia. But, at |
|
the same time, we have to be very clear in our own minds about |
|
our own standards and our own beliefs as well as the law |
|
regarding human rights. |
|
In Peru, if I can just say, yes, there were obviously a |
|
great deal of concerns about human rights. They have less to |
|
do, in my mind, with forcedown and shootdown of aircraft; but |
|
we also were faced with a law that may or may not have had a |
|
certain meaning regarding civil aircraft. |
|
As you probably know, Congressman, I led the fight to make |
|
sure that we would be able to provide realtime intelligence |
|
support to the Air Forces of Colombia and Peru. We are doing |
|
that now. We are doing that with great results. But we have had |
|
to be very careful, in part because we fundamentally believe in |
|
the rule of law and the need to have effective programs that |
|
won't be undermined over the medium and long term. |
|
Mr. Souder. You know, once again, I want to reiterate that |
|
I believe that you have been committed and have been pushing in |
|
this administration for that. I want to make sure that you |
|
understand, too, that in addition to the countries that are-- |
|
quite frankly have less financial clout in the world, Burma, |
|
Colombia and some of the others, compared to some of the bigger |
|
countries, that some of us want to see the same pressures |
|
across the board. We are not faulting--we want to keep pushing |
|
you, but we are not necessarily faulting where you have been. |
|
Mr. Hastert. I thank the gentleman. |
|
The gentleman from Florida, Mr. Mica. |
|
Mr. Mica. Mr. Chairman, Mr. Gelbard, one of the problems |
|
with the decertification law as we wrote it--and we wrote it |
|
back in the 1980's--was it tied foreign aid into drug |
|
eradication or drug efforts by nation; and many of the nations |
|
were poor and were dependent on U.S. assistance, received large |
|
U.S. assistance. |
|
One reason I don't think it worked with Colombia too well |
|
is, actually, it's a pretty wealthy nation. It's one of the |
|
wealthiest in the western hemisphere. |
|
I think our subcommittee and Congress needs to look at |
|
imposing some further pain on countries that don't need this. I |
|
think Senator Grassley is looking to multidecertifications; |
|
like the second strike, if they decertify Colombia that we look |
|
at some real pain for that country. So that is one thing that |
|
we may need to look at, that we talked about. |
|
Ambassador, the members of the committee went down; and we |
|
went to Colombia, we went to Peru, we went to Bolivia, other |
|
areas, Panama, Mexico. If this administration had really |
|
emasculated the interdiction program and even some of the |
|
eradication programs, if we came back and we put together all |
|
the resources that everyone needed or asked for--I don't think |
|
there wasn't anything that you all didn't ask for that we |
|
didn't deliver. We felt that policy was a disaster. Our |
|
experience in looking at it proved that it was a disaster. |
|
Then in September--and you alluded, too, in your testimony, |
|
too, the problem now with some of the air cover and other |
|
things that now these folks are going to--riverine strategy, |
|
taking the stuff out in boats and ships. In September, Barbara |
|
Larkin, Assistant Secretary of Legislative Affairs, sent the |
|
chairman, I think Mr. Gilman, notifying them of a drawdown for |
|
funds. This is--I talked about the other pot, the FMS pot. This |
|
is your pot, under State. That was to buy patrol boats, because |
|
we saw the problem now with this new pattern of trafficking and |
|
other equipment. |
|
It's my understanding that even in September, when you told |
|
us that this was going to be done, that nothing has been done |
|
in ordering this equipment. Is that correct? |
|
Mr. Gelbard. No, that is not correct. |
|
We have moved to provide--this is the program under Section |
|
506(a)(2), if I am not correct--is that right? |
|
Mr. Barr. Yes. |
|
Mr. Mica. Yes. |
|
Mr. Gelbard. We have moved to try to establish the proper |
|
agreements with the nations involved so we can send the |
|
equipment there. |
|
The Colombian--we have needed two provisions under the law. |
|
One is an end user agreement and the second is an agreement on |
|
human rights. We finally received that agreement from the |
|
Colombian Minister of Defense on February 11th. We were delayed |
|
by the Colombian Government. |
|
Mr. Mica. So it's the agreement? |
|
Mr. Gelbard. That is done. |
|
Mr. Mica. But these still haven't been ordered, right? This |
|
equipment? |
|
Mr. Gelbard. No. It is all ordered, and it is ready to move |
|
now that we have---- |
|
Mr. Mica. I would have to disagree with that. I have the |
|
manufacturer back--in the back of the hearing room here, and he |
|
tells me nothing has been done. |
|
The same thing for Peru. If you turn to the |
|
administration's letter--and I don't know of any |
|
decertification in Peru--we will also furnish three river |
|
patrol boat craft to Peruvian security. We are asking for a |
|
drawdown of $13.75 million. This stuff hasn't even been ordered |
|
yet. They tell me it will take, after the order, 120 days, half |
|
a year, before this is produced. |
|
So we went down in April. You requested this in September; |
|
and nothing is done, at least as far as ordering the equipment. |
|
Is that correct? |
|
Mr. Gelbard. I don't order the equipment. This is--excuse |
|
me. This is the Department of Defense. I am sorry, but I can't |
|
answer for the Department of Defense on this one. |
|
Mr. Mica. Mr. Chairman, I would ask that our staff look |
|
into this. This is absolutely uncalled for. |
|
Now, we have talked about moving to eradication; and we--I |
|
have a confidential report here that we had 12 aircraft in the |
|
air on eradication. Then we went down to eight, and now we are |
|
down to five. Is that correct? Are we now flying only five or |
|
is this wrong? |
|
Mr. Gelbard. No, that is not right. |
|
Mr. Mica. How many are we flying? |
|
Mr. Gelbard. I have said several times today, Congressman, |
|
that we have nine spray planes there. We had 11. Two were |
|
destroyed, including the loss of life. We have increased the |
|
number of helicopters substantially in Colombia, and we now |
|
provide something like two-thirds of---- |
|
Mr. Mica. What about the eradication? |
|
Mr. Gelbard. Can I give you some details? |
|
Mr. Mica. How many eradication planes are flying today? |
|
Mr. Gelbard. I am just about to give you the details. |
|
We have nine U.S. Government-owned Turbo Thrush spray |
|
planes. We have---- |
|
Mr. Mica. That are flying today? |
|
Mr. Gelbard. Yes, sir. |
|
Mr. Mica. What about---- |
|
Mr. Gelbard. We have a Casa-212 transport aircraft, a |
|
Cessna 208 helicopter or aircraft, three Bell-212 helicopters. |
|
Plus we have a very large number of helicopters that we have |
|
provided to the Government of Colombia, to the police, |
|
including 12 additional helicopters that we gave them last |
|
year. |
|
Mr. Mica. What about the status, finally--I guess, my time |
|
is running out here. It's my understanding, in 1994, that the |
|
Department of State installed an individual without any prior |
|
practical or technical experience in counternarcotics operation |
|
as the director of the NAS, Narcotics Affairs Section, of the |
|
Embassy. Is that individual still there or the same person in |
|
charge since 1994, do you know? |
|
Mr. Gelbard. The individual who is heading the narcotics |
|
assistance section has been doing an outstanding job. |
|
Ambassador Frechette obviously feels that this is the highest |
|
priority in his work; and he spends personally a great deal of |
|
time on these issues, as does his deputy. |
|
We have a very large staff in that Embassy. In fact, we |
|
just hired a retired colonel, whom I personally know, to run |
|
all of our air assets. The total amount of air assets that we |
|
have, as I say, is extraordinarily large. |
|
Mr. Mica. So we have the same person in charge of the air? |
|
Mr. Gelbard. We have the same person in charge. |
|
One point I want to make on the 506(a) program, by law the |
|
equipment provided under that law--under that program--comes |
|
from stocks and inventories in the U.S. Government. So I am |
|
confused as to whether anything would be ordered from any |
|
private companies. But the law states, as I understand it, and |
|
I could be wrong, that it's a drawdown authority from stocks |
|
and inventories. |
|
Mr. Mica. Well, when this is over, I would like to |
|
introduce you to the vendor, who is in the back. It is also |
|
stated in here what you would be purchasing. |
|
Mr. Hastert. The gentleman from Florida, it is time to move |
|
on. |
|
The gentleman from Georgia. |
|
I might add, just for the record, too, you characterized |
|
that as a confidential report. That was a private sector report |
|
and not a government report. Is that correct? |
|
Mr. Mica. Yes. |
|
Mr. Hastert. Thank you. |
|
The gentleman from Georgia. |
|
Mr. Barr. Thank you, Mr. Chairman. |
|
Previously, when we were having a discussion, Mr. |
|
Ambassador, you mentioned that at some length, as I recall, the |
|
great steps that Mexico has taken, the laws and so forth; and |
|
you were very kind to mention the work that my office had done |
|
in Atlanta in drug cases. Prosecutorial offices, of course, |
|
wherever they are located, whether they are located in Mexico, |
|
Colombia or Atlanta, the success of their efforts can be |
|
measured only by the willingness and the ability of |
|
prosecutorial offices to carry out the laws that are passed. |
|
Passing laws that look great on the surface really means |
|
very little and sometimes can be worse than not passing them at |
|
all because then it becomes a smoke screen that is held up as |
|
evidence of great progress that is being made simply because |
|
they passed these tough laws, but that is not being used, then |
|
we still have a very serious problem. We all know, I think, |
|
today that the problem that we have is with extradition and |
|
that no progress has been made on that. I know the |
|
administration is trying to get the Government of Colombia to |
|
do something about that. |
|
But I think you mentioned Mexico, and I am not really sure |
|
that Mexico's--that the track record of the Mexican Government |
|
in recent years really merits a great deal of compliment. Isn't |
|
it true that we really have just over the last 4 years |
|
requested literally dozens of extraditions that they have only |
|
complied in three cases, the Mexican Government, that is? |
|
Mr. Gelbard. We obviously feel that extradition is one of |
|
the fundamental tools worldwide, and we have been pressing |
|
nations around the world to negotiate, implement, ratify, |
|
implement world class, up-to-date extradition treaties. Let me |
|
say that we have been very pleased under Attorney General |
|
Reno's leadership in particular that we have now been |
|
successful in negotiating a series of new extradition treaties. |
|
Recently one in Bolivia came under force---- |
|
Mr. Barr. That is fine. I will put into the record that the |
|
administration has done a great job in these areas. I am |
|
talking about Mexico. |
|
Mr. Gelbard. What has happened with Mexico, as I said |
|
earlier, is that they started for the first time to extradite |
|
nationals early last year, and this was important because it |
|
was without precedent. Under their law, it says they can |
|
extradite people under exceptional circumstances. We obviously |
|
would like to see them extradite an awful lot more people. I |
|
don't have the exact numbers that they have extradited so far, |
|
but we clearly would like to see many more. |
|
Mr. Barr. It is my information that there have been only |
|
three, and one of those was a U.S. citizen. So I--but---- |
|
Mr. Gelbard. In terms of U.S. citizens and other nationals, |
|
I believe--and I would be happy to get you the statistics on |
|
this--that they have extradited a great deal more. The question |
|
is really how many of their own nationals have they extradited, |
|
how many they are prepared to do. |
|
[The information referred to follows:] |
|
|
|
In 1996, there were 13 extraditions altogether. Two of |
|
these were Mexican nationals; the others were U.S. citizens or |
|
other nationalities. |
|
|
|
Mr. Barr. That is the question, and it is my information |
|
that they have only extradited two. If you have differing |
|
information, I would be happy to receive it. |
|
Mr. Gelbard. We have been pressing them to do more. When |
|
the new Attorney General was just here 2 weeks ago, the |
|
Attorney General, I, and others, General McCaffrey, have been |
|
putting them at the very top of our priority list. |
|
Mr. Barr. I appreciate that, and I understand we have been |
|
pressing the Colombian Government to do more, notwithstanding |
|
the problems we have been having with the president himself |
|
down there. Again, I don't want to beat a dead horse, but I |
|
feel, and I think you can gather, that maybe some other members |
|
of the panel share my concern here that we are applying one |
|
standard to Colombia and a very different standard to Mexico. |
|
I would like to, in the remaining short period of time that |
|
I have, to return to an area that we left unfinished earlier, |
|
although in subsequent discussions you touched on some of the |
|
things that I was going to mention also. The letter from |
|
September 1996 concerning the waiver under 506(a)(2), and that |
|
is fine, although I am concerned, as Mr. Mica is, that there is |
|
a big difference between the documents being sent forward and |
|
the action being actually taken to get the equipment in the |
|
hands of the folks down there in Colombia. |
|
But again, has there been no effort to look at the other |
|
waiver authority contained in the same section in the earlier |
|
paragraph (a)(1) in terms of assistance? I think it is |
|
particularly important not so much in the large picture but in |
|
the small picture that our military, if the President would |
|
look at this, could be getting some much needed equipment down |
|
there very, very quickly. We know that we are having--they are |
|
having a problem with the helicopters and delays in getting |
|
them repaired, the DC-3, the mini-guns which they have expended |
|
the money on their own because apparently somebody made the |
|
decision that the use of mini-guns would violate human rights |
|
or something. But isn't the authority that the President could |
|
be exercising under (a)(1) a tool that could help here? |
|
Mr. Gelbard. Let me just get back to the issue under |
|
(a)(2). According to law, we have to have guarantees about the |
|
use of equipment, and we now also have to have guarantees about |
|
human rights provisions. The Colombian Government only gave us |
|
those assurances on the 11th of this month. We are now moving, |
|
and we have, the military are moving to move that equipment to |
|
Colombia rapidly. |
|
Mr. Barr. Could I just suggest, to help you all out, that |
|
we have the gentleman here today, and you deal with him on |
|
regular basis, and he has stated, I think, very accurately that |
|
tremendous--and he has worked with us in this area; why does it |
|
take that long? You have the men here. You deal with them on a |
|
regular basis. |
|
Mr. Gelbard. Because Ambassador Frechette felt he needed |
|
assurances from the Minister of Defense, and the Minister of |
|
Defense just gave it to him now. I am--in the terms of |
|
506(a)(1), I have got to study that, and I would like to give |
|
an answer for the record on that. |
|
Mr. Barr. I would appreciate that very much. |
|
Mr. Hastert. I would like to state we are going to ask that |
|
the authorities submit written questions and have those |
|
questions answered and have the record left open. |
|
[The information referred to follows:] |
|
|
|
In order to direct that assistance be furnished under the |
|
authority of section 506(a)(1) of the FAA, the President would |
|
have to first determine and report to Congress that: (a) an |
|
unforeseen emergency exists which requires immediate military |
|
assistance to a foreign country or international organization; |
|
and (b) the emergency requirement cannot be met under the |
|
authority of the Arms Export Control Act or any other law |
|
except this section. On the other hand, in order to provide |
|
assistance under section 506(a)(2) of the FAA, the President |
|
would have to determine and report to Congress that it is in |
|
the national interest of the United States to direct a drawdown |
|
for, among other things, the purposes and under the authorities |
|
of chapter 8 of part I of the FAA (relating to international |
|
narcotics control assistance). |
|
The assistance being provided to the CNP and the Colombian |
|
military for CN assistance in accordance with a section |
|
506(a)(2) FAA drawdown directed by the President on September |
|
31, 1996, is part of a large package of CN assistance designed |
|
to strengthen and maintain the CN efforts of a number of |
|
countries in South America and the Caribbean, including |
|
Colombia. Under these circumstances, it was determined that |
|
section 506(a)(2) was the most appropriate authority under |
|
which to authorize this drawdown, although it is not |
|
inconceivable that CN assistance could be provided under the |
|
authority of section 506(a)(1), given the appropriate |
|
circumstances. |
|
|
|
Mr. Hastert. The gentleman from Ohio. |
|
Mr. LaTourette. Thank you, and I will be as brief as |
|
possible. |
|
In your earlier testimony, you talked about increased |
|
levels, principally from your budget, dealing with the-- |
|
although if I broke it down--22.6 going to 440 million, if I |
|
remember that correctly. Will the certification decision |
|
upcoming on March 1st affect the State Department's commitment |
|
to increasing these dollar amounts in this next fiscal year? |
|
Mr. Gelbard. No. |
|
Mr. LaTourette. There is also a---- |
|
Mr. Gelbard. There is a waiver authority, one, against, I |
|
don't know what the decision will be, but there is a waiver |
|
authority under the law so we can continue to provide |
|
counternarcotics assistance. |
|
Mr. LaTourette. Something that hasn't been touched on yet |
|
in response to the certification decision in 1996 and in |
|
response to the polling, and I understand we have a blacklist |
|
of some little over 300 Colombians that are considered to be |
|
front companies. Has there been retaliation by the Colombian |
|
Government either in trade advantages or other activities vis- |
|
a-vis the United States Government or American businesses? |
|
Mr. Gelbard. I think to a degree there has been. But I |
|
think it is hard to disaggregate that from the standard high |
|
levels of corruption which exist. One example was a contract |
|
recently for their national civil registry which alluded to |
|
earlier where a German company, Siemens, appears to have found |
|
ways to gain unfair advantage on the contract, perhaps by |
|
bribing. Bribes are tax deductible under German law, amazingly. |
|
They were continually disqualified after they had won the |
|
contract, by coincidence. Then it came down to between a French |
|
and an American company, and my understanding was the American |
|
company was clearly best qualified. |
|
Ultimately they decided not to award the contract. We have |
|
seen other cases, and I have heard of other cases from American |
|
companies, but I think they would prefer I not mention them by |
|
name. |
|
Mr. LaTourette. I understand. |
|
I want to yield the rest of my time to Mr. Mica, but this |
|
is a published report that it talked about. Even though you |
|
declined to mention specifically other measures the U.S. |
|
Government may take, there is a published report today that |
|
talks about airline flights in Colombia and other things that |
|
may or may not occur in the course of the certification |
|
process. If you put--I would appreciate the opportunity to send |
|
a written inquiry about that. My particular question is the |
|
impact that it would have on American concerns doing business |
|
in Colombia. I will be glad to supply this in writing to you, |
|
Mr. Ambassador. |
|
With that, I would like to yield the balance of my time to |
|
Mr. Mica. |
|
Mr. Hastert. Without objection. |
|
Mr. Mica. Bob, back to this reason that we can't seem to |
|
get this equipment. We are trying to get things down to these |
|
countries that have been cooperating also, and here is a letter |
|
from the Department of State, September 14th. It says Peru has |
|
been cooperating, and talks about the great cooperation, and |
|
they want to get river patrol boats to the Peruvian security |
|
forces to intercept the cocaine base, asked for the money. You |
|
said somebody in DOD is holding up some of this. This is your |
|
money; this isn't FMF. |
|
Mr. Gelbard. As I said, I don't have the letter in front of |
|
me, so it is hard for me to answer. Is this the 506(a)(2) |
|
program? |
|
Mr. Mica. Yes. |
|
Mr. Gelbard. That is from military inventories and |
|
drawdowns. It is off the shelf. Under the law, it is off the |
|
shelf---- |
|
Mr. Mica. That is not what it says here, because it talks |
|
about some specifics that will be acquired to--in any event, |
|
Bob, is there somebody at DOD that is not cooperating that we |
|
can talk to? We want to get this equipment to them. I don't |
|
care if it's off the shelf. It is not in the Yungay, where it |
|
needs to be, or in the Riverine program. So what is the |
|
problem? You wrote us asking for this in September, or the |
|
State did, and it is still not there. |
|
Mr. Gelbard. This is done by the Defense Supply Agency. I |
|
will be happy to get you specific answers on this within the |
|
next few days. |
|
[The information referred to follows:] |
|
|
|
The ``river patrol boats'' will be provided to Peru for |
|
counternarcotics (CN) assistance as part of the FAA section |
|
506(a)(2) drawdown directed by the President on September 31, |
|
1996. This drawdown included CN assistance for a number of |
|
countries, including Peru. Prior to delivery of any of the |
|
assistance, we needed to assure ourselves that appropriate end- |
|
use, security and retransfer assurances were in place from all |
|
recipient countries, and that end-use monitoring systems would |
|
be effective. Once that process was completed, DSAA was |
|
authorized to begin to execute the drawdown. On February 21, |
|
DSAA ordered the Special Operations Command to draw down three |
|
Boston Whalers, which are scheduled to be delivered to Peru in |
|
March, 1997. |
|
|
|
Mr. Mica. Thank you, Mr. Chairman. |
|
Mr. Gelbard. Let me just add I am as frustrated as you on |
|
this because, when the bureaucracy doesn't move, I know who |
|
eventually gets blamed. But I also want to see the equipment |
|
out there, more importantly. I want to see them having this |
|
stuff that they could use, whether it is airplanes or boats or |
|
anything else; and it is a source of eternal frustration for me |
|
when they don't move faster. |
|
Mr. Mica. Thank you. I will yield my few remaining seconds |
|
to Mr. Souder. |
|
Mr. Souder. In a fairness question, you have rejected the |
|
ability of the President of Colombia to travel on a visa. We |
|
have a report here that suggests that one of the Governors of |
|
Mexico has been also in--implied that he is involved with a lot |
|
of drug money and drug trafficking. Would you be willing to |
|
look at revoking his visa as well? |
|
Mr. Gelbard. We look at numerous examples with frequency. |
|
Our bureau does try to examine this with seriousness, so we are |
|
prepared to look at all information. |
|
Mr. Souder. We will followup. |
|
Mr. Hastert. Just two very quick questions before our time |
|
is done. First of all, there has been a lot of talk. You talked |
|
about the efforts of the--some aspects of Colombian Government, |
|
especially people like Mr. Valdivieso or and General Serrano |
|
and others. Will you brief the new Secretary of State on the |
|
progress that Colombia has made, certain aspects before the |
|
decision on certification or decertification is made? |
|
Mr. Gelbard. Yes, sir. |
|
Mr. Hastert. That will happen? |
|
Mr. Gelbard. Yes, sir. |
|
Mr. Hastert. In the process, whether Colombia is certified, |
|
decertified, whether there are waivers, whether there are |
|
certain areas of aid moved forward, as you talked about, what |
|
exactly will be the issue or the determinant factors of whether |
|
there is certification or decertification that will take place |
|
in this coming year? |
|
Mr. Gelbard. We have been outlining, as we have each of the |
|
last several years, specific measures for the Government of |
|
Colombia which we hope they will undertake during the course of |
|
this calendar year to improve performance. We have--I can, for |
|
example, give you a list of things we asked them to do for |
|
1996. We asked them to attack corruption, pass strong laws and |
|
regulate the finance industry, insure key traffickers don't run |
|
their empires from jail, expose front companies, convict major |
|
traffickers with serious sentences, reconsider the current |
|
policy of non-extradition of nationals, improve eradication and |
|
look at granular herbicides, enhance interdiction including |
|
rapid response by the military, better cooperation and expand |
|
courts and customs, and so on. |
|
We are very transparent about this, and we have periodic |
|
discussions. Ambassador Frechette meets regularly, thanks to |
|
the excellent cooperation we have had with the foreign minister |
|
and others, and they go over this every couple of months. I |
|
have had periodic conversations here with their charge before |
|
the Ambassador came. We have gone over it in very clear |
|
specific terms. |
|
Mr. Hastert. I thank you for your testimony today. It has |
|
been very candid, and we wish you great success in your work. |
|
As we welcome two very distinguished generals, I also want |
|
to recognize two others in the audience, two senators are with |
|
us today. The two senators have a response to the law for the |
|
asset forfeiture and the current proposed amendment to the |
|
Constitution on extradition. We would like to welcome Senator |
|
Herman Vargas and Senator Claudia Blum. Thank you and thank you |
|
for being with us today. |
|
At this time, it is a great pleasure and honor to introduce |
|
General Serrano. The general has combated internal corruption |
|
in the police force, captured six of the seven leaders of the |
|
Cali Cartel. The people of Colombia and the people of the |
|
United States are indebted to him for his great service on the |
|
war on drugs. |
|
With him today is General Bedoya, the decorated, certainly |
|
accomplished commander in his field. He leads the national |
|
military. He has brought his forces into the fray to support |
|
the war on drugs and certainly is a very fine complement and |
|
leader in this area and works arm and arm with General Serrano. |
|
We thank both of you gentlemen for being here today, and we |
|
look forward to your testimony. Because you are a national of |
|
another country, we will not ask you to swear your testimony. |
|
We would ask you to begin your testimony, General Serrano. We |
|
also welcome the translator, Mr. Acevedo. |
|
|
|
STATEMENTS OF MAJOR GENERAL JOSE ROSSO SERRANO, DIRECTOR, |
|
COLOMBIAN NATIONAL POLICE; AND GENERAL HAROLD BEDOYA PIZARRO, |
|
COMMANDER, COLOMBIAN ARMED FORCES |
|
|
|
Mr. Serrano. Thank you, Chairman Hastert and friends of |
|
Colombia. It is an honor for me to be here with you today. |
|
Together with other Colombians, amongst them Mr. Herman Vargas |
|
and Senator Claudia Blum, those senators that were in charge of |
|
proposing the bill for the asset forfeiture. Thank you, Mr. |
|
Hastert and Mr. Mica, for having gone to Colombia to understand |
|
the problems firsthand. |
|
From my position as head of the Colombian police, we have |
|
been charged with carrying out the fight against the |
|
international narcotics organizations. In less than 6 months we |
|
incarcerated the heads of the most important criminal |
|
organization in the world. For those purposes, we had the aid |
|
and support of the United States, especially with the help of |
|
members of the CIA and the DEA that work with us shoulder to |
|
shoulder. We also received help from the Department of State |
|
through the NAS. |
|
I have got to tell you, however, that the narcotics trade |
|
in Colombia is extremely complex. Because having two coasts |
|
that can be used to bring in precursor chemicals, a coast that |
|
we, of course, do not build or otherwise--these coasts also |
|
allow and facilitate the exit of the drugs from Colombia. |
|
Additionally, we are able to transfer and transport money, |
|
and it is also very easy for the narcotics traffickers to |
|
travel by plane. All this means that we have an international |
|
problem. |
|
We are all, in part, responsible. The way I believe that we |
|
need to solve this problem, after having fought the fight for |
|
more than 10 years, is that we all recognize our own errors and |
|
we don't start putting the blame on our neighbor. Sometimes I |
|
hear some countries saying that I'm only a transit country. But |
|
also in those countries there are people that allow those |
|
planes to arrive and then they turn around and send the drugs |
|
on to the countries in which it is consumed. |
|
I am well aware of many of the details of what is a war. We |
|
have always received tremendous help from the United States. If |
|
we had not received that help, the problem today would be even |
|
greater. There are some people here that do understand this |
|
very well. For example, General McCaffrey, Mr. Constantine, and |
|
others as well as many Members and Representatives and Senators |
|
of this important Congress that understand well the dimensions |
|
of this problem. |
|
The work that we do, we do because we believe in it, |
|
because we are aware of the fact that narcotics trafficking is |
|
evil. It has injured the world community, and it is the worst |
|
plague this century has known. We do not want to see our |
|
children or our grandchildren as drug consumers, nor do we want |
|
their lives to be taken because they have fallen to drug |
|
trafficking. |
|
In Colombia, along with the Colombian Armed Forces, a |
|
tremendous effort is being undertaken, of course, under the |
|
direction and leadership of President Samper, because he is the |
|
commander and chief of the Colombian Armed Forces. Little could |
|
be done, in reality, if he did not personally support these |
|
efforts. |
|
This year a special tax has been imposed--a war tax, $74 |
|
million will be--$74 million will be received through this |
|
mechanism, and they will be invested in communications |
|
equipment and other vehicles and in strengthening our |
|
intelligence apparatus. Those resources, added to the resources |
|
that we get from the United States, will allow that in the year |
|
that is before us the final results will be even better. |
|
You all well know that Colombia has three principle |
|
problems in relation to narcotics trafficking. Unfortunately, |
|
we have marijuana that we find through eradication. When we |
|
approached the end of that problem, cocaine appeared. Now as we |
|
approach the end of the cocaine problem, the opium poppy |
|
appears. It is the only country in the entire world where all |
|
three of these problems have appeared. For these reasons, our |
|
job is difficult and complex, but in this fight we have |
|
obtained some satisfactory results. |
|
In Colombia, the narcotics organizations are true |
|
multinational entities. They have administrative staff, they |
|
have managers, they have legal representatives, they have heads |
|
of security. This is the type of organization that we have had |
|
to fight, and that is what we have to do. |
|
I would ask that greater efforts be done on the part of the |
|
United States to impede the flow of precursor chemicals. |
|
Without acetone, caustic acid, or sulfuric acid there would be |
|
no drug production. As far as that is concerned, no efforts |
|
have been had in that area. |
|
The amount of money that is moved around and the precursor |
|
chemical trade is perhaps as big as the amount of money |
|
produced by the drug trade itself. For these reasons, beyond |
|
asset forfeiture and money laundering, an effort must be made |
|
on the part of the international banking community so that not |
|
as many dollars find their way into this trade. |
|
One particular narcotics trafficker had $150 million in |
|
barrels and no bank noticed its movement. Last year tremendous |
|
efforts were made to eradicate. Mr. Hastert, you personally |
|
know how difficult it is to actually fumigate in the Colombian |
|
jungle. Despite all of these difficulties, we have fumigated |
|
over 40- and 17,000 acres of amapola, or opium poppy, and we |
|
have destroyed more than 800 laboratories. Last week we |
|
destroyed a laboratory that had--that was more than 4 |
|
kilometers wide. Last night I was informed of the destruction |
|
of another large laboratory in the south of Colombia. |
|
This means that our work is ongoing and permanent and that |
|
with good help and good understanding this war will be won. The |
|
capture of different criminals was spectacular last year and |
|
the year before. After drawing up extensive plans with the CIA |
|
and the DEA, actions were had against the Cali Cartel, and the |
|
cartel was brought to its knees. One particular narcotics |
|
trafficker, Santacruz Londono, was able to initially avoid |
|
actions of the police; but after 40 days of running from us, he |
|
died fighting the police. Let that be a lesson to all the other |
|
narcotics traffickers because we will fight them, and we are |
|
controlling them. |
|
But in this war, economic aid is very important. Our |
|
countries are poor countries, and we do not have all the means |
|
and resources to throw at this fight. While it is true that we |
|
do receive aid, it would be important that this aid be |
|
increased so that we can increase the fumigation efforts and |
|
the eradication efforts. The only country in the world that |
|
fumigates is Colombia. In these fumigation efforts we have lost |
|
five helicopters and two airplanes that have been shot down by |
|
the illicit narcotics traffickers. |
|
I would like to clarify something about the presence of |
|
guerilla groups in the areas in which there are illicit crops. |
|
It is undeniable that the Colombian guerilla groups have lost |
|
any remnant of political ideology and that they have now become |
|
allies of narcotics traffickers. This clarification is very |
|
important when considerations are being dealt with on helping |
|
the Armed Forces help us in the fight. If they had helicopters |
|
or different resources, they could protect us so we are not |
|
killed while we carry out our activities. |
|
I would also like to briefly mention the impact that the |
|
decertification has had. For me it has been very difficult to |
|
explain to my men that fight--the daily fight and convince them |
|
and tell them that, while they support our efforts, while they |
|
admire our efforts and our sacrifices, they still have |
|
decertified us. I am not a politician nor do I understand |
|
political considerations, but what I do know is that in my |
|
country we feel stigmatized because of this decertification. My |
|
11,000 police officers would be more motivated to continue in |
|
this fight because, before being police officers, we are |
|
Colombians. |
|
On the other hand, the decertification has affected us |
|
severely in the FMS cases that have to do with the procurement |
|
of spare parts for helicopters, munitions and explosives, and |
|
training. I believe that those resources have been sorely |
|
missed, and I have always believed that the less aid, the more |
|
narcotics trafficking. |
|
We have always used all the aid and resources that have |
|
been granted us as transparently as possible. The results are |
|
well known to you, Mr. Hastert, and, above all, you know that |
|
we are committed to this fight. We will not abate. We will win |
|
this war. We are going to win this fight in spite of the pain |
|
that visiting the different funeral services of my men that I |
|
have to go to. One given day I had to go to four funerals, and |
|
at the end of the day I could no longer cry. I no longer had |
|
words to explain to the widows of my men why it is that the |
|
narcotics traffickers have killed their husbands. |
|
My men are killed in the jungles of Colombia, and they are |
|
willing to sacrifice their lives because they recognize that |
|
narcotics trafficking is a plague because it brings tremendous |
|
stigmatism to Colombia. But rest assured, Mr. Hastert, that the |
|
great majority of Colombians are honest and are committed to |
|
fighting this fight. Not even death has kept us from this |
|
fight. Let me tell you that since 1980, more than 3,000 of my |
|
men have died. Pablo Escobar in Medellin in 1 year alone had |
|
500 killed. He used to pay $2,000 per policeman. In spite of |
|
this situation, we have never, never fallen back. On the |
|
contrary, we remain vigorous, we remain motivated in the fight. |
|
You have heard us in the past, and we are willing to continue |
|
in the future. |
|
I would like to end giving you a message not as a policeman |
|
but as a Colombian citizen. My country needs to be certified. |
|
My men are more motivated when they work as certified. Thank |
|
you very much. |
|
Mr. Hastert. Thank you, General. |
|
[The prepared statement of Jose Rosso Serrano follows:] |
|
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T9818.013 |
|
|
|
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T9818.014 |
|
|
|
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T9818.015 |
|
|
|
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T9818.016 |
|
|
|
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T9818.017 |
|
|
|
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T9818.018 |
|
|
|
Mr. Hastert. I might ask that we are kind of bumping up |
|
into some time constraints, so if General Bedoya could |
|
summarize his statement. |
|
General Bedoya. Mr. Chairman, members of the subcommittee, |
|
thank you for having invited me to this meeting. I would like |
|
to, as the oldest soldier in Colombia and commander of the |
|
Colombian Armed Forces, express to you the friendship that the |
|
Colombian Armed Forces have with the United States. That is not |
|
new, but that was born when many years ago together we fought |
|
together to defend liberty, freedom, democracy in Korea. |
|
I want to let you know that the Colombian Armed Forces |
|
entered into the narcotics fight completely last year. The |
|
government considered at that time that it was an aggression, |
|
an attack against the people of Colombia and against the |
|
country as a whole. It was also decided that the police did not |
|
have the capacity nor the means to fight groups such as the |
|
ones that they were fighting. |
|
Additionally, in the jungles of Colombia, which comprises |
|
about a third of all of Colombia, it was discovered that the |
|
large cocaine or drug processing laboratories were protected |
|
and guarded by groups that have now become terrorist narcotics |
|
traffickers themselves. |
|
Last year, last August 30th in the Caqueta region, we lost |
|
26 soldiers in the battles with the narcotics traffickers. |
|
Right now we have more than 60 soldiers that are currently |
|
kidnapped and are in the hands of these narcotics traffickers. |
|
This is without mentioning the other efforts and other |
|
activities that we have done in other regions such as the |
|
Guaviare and Putumayo. |
|
But this human sacrifice has not been in vain. Beyond this |
|
we have made significant improvements in the destruction of |
|
laboratories and in the capture of different allies. With the |
|
national police, we have been able to work together to fight |
|
and to defeat the different elements of the narcotics trade. We |
|
as Colombians understand that we need to destroy the |
|
laboratories and the plantations of illicit crops wherever they |
|
may be found in Colombia. But we also understand that the |
|
problem of illicit narcotics is a regional problem. |
|
Many other countries such as Peru and Bolivia also fight |
|
this plague. The United States itself deals with the problem of |
|
drug consumption. Still other countries produce the chemical |
|
precursors that are necessary to produce illicit drugs. An |
|
entire infrastructure has been put into place to continue this |
|
illicit trade. |
|
We the people of Colombia have suffered at hands--we have |
|
suffered at the hands of illicit narcotic traffickers. However, |
|
our tradition is of freedom, of working toward ending this. |
|
That is why it is so important that this fight, this war |
|
against illicit narcotics, that is why it is so important that |
|
we find allies, that we find co-workers, that we find the |
|
understanding necessary to eliminate the problem. |
|
The Colombian Armed Forces have suffered from the |
|
decertification decision. Our young officers have been unable |
|
to return to the training courses here in the United States. |
|
The different types of sales amongst them, the FMS cases are |
|
currently suspended or otherwise have been suspended. It is |
|
difficult to understand how it is that in this fight, in which |
|
all of us must work toward the solution, those of us who are |
|
fighting the fight in the jungles and in the mountains are the |
|
ones that actually suffer the effects of the decertification. |
|
In some areas we don't even have the munitions necessary to |
|
fight the fight, much less helicopters. |
|
On the other hand, our common enemy, the narcotics |
|
traffickers, had at their disposition a fleet of airplanes and |
|
other equipment, and they have no restrictions on how they |
|
might purchase things or where they get their money. |
|
In a frontal fight, you have to clearly determine who your |
|
enemy is. We are now the enemy. The enemy is internal narcotics |
|
that is prevalent in the entire world. |
|
The Colombian people can be characterized as noble, a |
|
working people, and they also have suffered. We consider the |
|
United States as our ally in this fight and hope that together |
|
we will continue to fight and win the battle. |
|
Last year alone in the activities that were carried out in |
|
the south of our country, the Colombian Armed Forces spent over |
|
$24 million of their budget. We destroyed laboratories, we |
|
destroyed laboratories and other elements that would have been |
|
able to produce 45 billion cocaine doses, with a possible |
|
street value of $284 billion. |
|
Mr. Chairman, thank you for the opportunity to be before |
|
you today, and with General Serrano, we are ready to answer any |
|
of your questions. |
|
[The prepared statement of General Bedoya follows:] |
|
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T9818.019 |
|
|
|
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T9818.020 |
|
|
|
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T9818.021 |
|
|
|
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T9818.022 |
|
|
|
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T9818.023 |
|
|
|
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T9818.024 |
|
|
|
Mr. Hastert. I thank both of the distinguished gentlemen |
|
for being with us here today, and certainly it is an |
|
unbelievable story to tell. Unfortunately, your colleague |
|
General Valdivieso could not be with us today, however, we have |
|
received his statement and that will be included also in the |
|
record. |
|
[The prepared statement of General Valdivieso follows:] |
|
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T9818.025 |
|
|
|
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T9818.026 |
|
|
|
Mr. Hastert. Again, gentlemen, we thank you very, very much |
|
for your presentations. |
|
General Serrano, one of the things that happened in this |
|
city just last week was the death and burial of a very |
|
courageous policeman. You talked about the deaths of many of |
|
your valiant and courageous men. How many men have you lost in |
|
the last year? |
|
General Serrano. In 1996, we lost 36 policemen and 61 were |
|
injured. |
|
Mr. Hastert. General Bedoya, how many men did you lose? |
|
General Bedoya. Last year the Colombian Armed Forces lost |
|
330 soldiers in action. |
|
Mr. Hastert. What about the year before? |
|
General Bedoya. The year before the figures are basically |
|
the same, but added to this, you have to consider the 60 |
|
soldiers that are currently kidnapped in the south of Colombia |
|
and 10 who are kidnapped in the Uraba region. |
|
Mr. Hastert. How about General Serrano? |
|
General Serrano. The year before, 27 or 28 policemen were |
|
killed, and these numbers are getting better because the |
|
Colombian police are learning to defend themselves. But the |
|
attacks, the ferocity of the attacks has increased. |
|
Mr. Hastert. Thank you, I certainly award anybody's comment |
|
at all of you. |
|
General Serrano, President Clinton's decision to decertify |
|
Colombia on March 1, 1996, it certainly had detrimental effects |
|
on the economy and your efforts to fight the war on drugs. How |
|
did it affect your ability to do your job? |
|
General Serrano. We were unable to receive $8 million in |
|
spare parts and munitions, which is what we most use and need |
|
to fight this fight. We also lost training. Many policemen had |
|
been coming to the United States to prepare themselves for the |
|
war. However, there have been efforts on the part of the State |
|
Department to send us 12 helicopters. It is hoped that those |
|
helicopters will eventually arrive in Colombia sometime this |
|
semester. |
|
Mr. Hastert. The process, the equipment that you needed |
|
last year, and of course the DC-3 aircraft that you use for |
|
support and for some of the drug eradication, how do you use |
|
those DC-3 aircraft and how many are in your inventory and what |
|
are their approximate ages? |
|
General Serrano. We have two DC-3s. These DC-3s are World |
|
War II vintage, but they have been souped up. They have been |
|
given new turbines, and it is a reliable airplane, but without |
|
the constant flow of spare parts, they only last 1 or 2 months |
|
before they need repair. |
|
Mr. Hastert. How do you use them? |
|
General Serrano. These are used basically to transport |
|
personnel to the jungle regions, because they can land on short |
|
airstrips. They are also used to transport chemicals that are |
|
needed to carry out the fumigation. |
|
Mr. Hastert. Have the spare parts that are needed to keep |
|
these airplanes flying been available? |
|
General Serrano. Yes. While the spare parts must be asked |
|
for, eventually they are forthcoming. |
|
Mr. Hastert. In 1995, you lost a DC-3 in a rather serious |
|
accident in August. How did that affect your counternarcotic |
|
activities? |
|
General Serrano. That airplane was out of service for more |
|
than a year. It had to be sent to the United States to be |
|
repaired and was sorely missed while it was not in service. |
|
However, it has begun to help again. |
|
Mr. Hastert. Mr. Mica. |
|
Mr. Mica. Thank you, Mr. Chairman. |
|
Welcome, General. We are pleased to see you here and |
|
appreciate your tremendous effort. |
|
I have a question relating to mini-guns. It is my |
|
understanding that you began a purchase from the United States |
|
in 1991 of these mini-guns. Could you tell us what the status |
|
of that program is and what the need of those weapons is for? |
|
General Serrano. The story of the mini-guns is a long one. |
|
Mr. Mica. Well, I have 5 minutes. |
|
General Serrano. When I was Director, when the General was |
|
Director of the Antinarcotics Police, the mini-guns arrived, |
|
but they did not arrive--all of the mini-guns did not arrive. |
|
The complete equipment that they needed did not arrive. |
|
Efforts were made to purchase the remaining elements that |
|
were needed for the mini-guns with our own moneys; but it was |
|
impossible. I even proposed that from our budget money be set |
|
aside, and about this I spoke with Mr. Hastert. We are still |
|
waiting for the authorizations to use them because now |
|
something has been said about the police being unable to use |
|
these weapons because they might possibly violate human rights. |
|
But they are extremely important in the fumigation activities |
|
and the fumigation runs in which we have lost five helicopters |
|
and two airplanes. |
|
Mr. Mica. How would the mini-guns be used again? Can you |
|
explain that? |
|
General Serrano. The mini-guns would be used in the |
|
helicopters, in the 206 helicopters to provide effective |
|
response when the other helicopters are attacked, in an attempt |
|
to dissuade these attacks from occurring. |
|
Mr. Mica. General Bedoya, can you tell me your perspective |
|
of the problem with these mini-guns, and maybe also the |
|
timeframe? Was some of this equipment--well, this equipment |
|
order goes back to 1991, and I guess that some of these |
|
problems predate the decertification; is that correct? Can you |
|
give us a little explanation of what took place and the timing? |
|
General Bedoya. These special machine guns that are being |
|
referred to here are support weapons that are used to provide |
|
support to the units that actually fight. Generally, these |
|
weapons--these are weapons that were used to support troops as |
|
they exit from the helicopters. These are used to suppress the |
|
attacks while the soldiers themselves are leaving the |
|
helicopters. |
|
Mr. Mica. The problem relating to the acquisition of |
|
weapons, the parts, predates certification, decertification? |
|
General Bedoya. Yes, we have had different sorts of |
|
problems in the different sorts of sales that we have been |
|
trying to get from the United States, among them the FMS cases, |
|
for about 4 years. Before decertification came around, the |
|
problem was some sort of human rights issues that were being |
|
raised. This has made it impossible for us to receive around |
|
$35 million of elements that we would either have purchased or |
|
elements that would have been given to us. |
|
Mr. Mica. You talked about the guerillas and ELN. Aren't |
|
they violating human rights, don't they have, at least, last |
|
count, I thought we had five American hostages? |
|
General Bedoya. These terrorist groups that you refer to |
|
last year kidnapped more than 1,000 Colombian citizens and they |
|
killed another 1,000. These groups carry out illegal |
|
activities, and of course they do not respect any international |
|
convention or they do not respect any human rights. |
|
In the different areas and regions where the narcotics |
|
production is carried out, there are many people that are |
|
employed in this production, and when the armed forces arrive |
|
in the area, these people complain to the armed forces of the |
|
human rights violations that are perpetrated by these narcotics |
|
trafficking and guerilla groups. |
|
Mr. Mica. The mini-guns that we talked about, would they be |
|
used in this fight against the narco-terrorist guerillas? |
|
General Bedoya. Yes, these guns would be used to fight the |
|
narcotics-terrorist insurgence groups. |
|
Mr. Hastert. Mr. Barr. |
|
Mr. Barr. Thank you, Mr. Chairman. |
|
I thank both of the generals, not only for being here |
|
today, but also for their tremendous work on behalf of all |
|
ciitzens of both our countries who believe in the rule of law |
|
and in personal freedom and in continuing the fight against the |
|
plague of drugs. |
|
In your view, and I say this to both generals, is the fight |
|
against narcotics simply a matter of treating it as a disease, |
|
or is it, in fact, a war against forces of evil who seek to |
|
destroy the very foundations of our societies? |
|
General Serrano. To me, it is an all-out war, a war of |
|
money that comes from illicit sources and destined to the |
|
injury of our youth. It is a war in which there are no ethical |
|
values. |
|
The only thing that really matters is the opulence, without |
|
heeding the consequences that the people that consume these |
|
drugs have to face. Narcotics trafficking has indeed changed |
|
the course that the world has taken. Today many people want to |
|
get rich quickly through narcotics trafficking instead of |
|
working. The worse thing is that there are many people that |
|
believe that narcotics trafficking is a business and not a |
|
crime. For this reason, it is a war that has to be fought |
|
because of the effects that it has, the malicious effects that |
|
it has in world society. |
|
General Bedoya. Narcotics trafficking began sometime in the |
|
1980's. We are not traditionally and never have been narcotics |
|
traffickers. It is drug activities that has made the people of |
|
Colombia poorer, and has distorted, in many cases, local |
|
economies and has contributed to the spreading of many |
|
diseases. |
|
In this war that has been brought, Colombians have had to |
|
fight the hardest fight, where we have had to fight an |
|
international Mafia that uses our country as a production |
|
center, but that has its foundations in many other places in |
|
the world as well. To fight this war, just as the term implies, |
|
we need special laws to fight this war. To destroy not only the |
|
laboratories and the illicit crops themselves, but also that |
|
would allow us to capture those that benefit from this terrible |
|
trade, be they in Colombia or abroad. |
|
For this reason, it is so important that the United States, |
|
being the country that it is that is the leader in the fight |
|
against narcotics, that they understand that the people of |
|
Colombia are victims of the activities of an internal Mafia |
|
that benefits from narcotics trafficking. |
|
Mr. Barr. Thank you. |
|
I think both Generals made statements that recognized, or |
|
indicating that they recognize that there is a very close |
|
connection between the narcotics organizations and the |
|
guerillas. Has that information been made known to the U.S. |
|
Government? |
|
General Serrano. Yes, because the Government of the United |
|
States has worked with us. In my experience, wherever there is |
|
cocaine or coca crops or opium poppy, or laboratories, these |
|
guerilla groups provide protection. We have definitive proof. |
|
The guerilla has established percentages that they charge per |
|
kilo of cocaine that is produced. |
|
They have also established fees for the entry of chemical |
|
precursors and they have established fees for the use of |
|
clandestine airstrips and also for the transportation of the |
|
different elements. All told, we estimate that their share is |
|
about 25 percent of the value of the cocaine that is produced |
|
and transported in the areas in which they operate. |
|
Mr. Barr. Thank you. |
|
Mr. Chairman, will there be a chance to ask just a couple |
|
of additional questions? |
|
Thank you. |
|
How many guerillas do you estimate are active in Colombia |
|
right now? We have seen published reports here of 14,000. |
|
General Bedoya. In order to complement the answer that was |
|
given to your previous question, I want to let you know that |
|
here I have documents that have been made known both to the |
|
Colombian media and the international media, and I personally |
|
want to give these documents to you so that you can see |
|
firsthand how it is that the relationship, the old relationship |
|
between the guerillas and the narcotics traffickers actually |
|
is. Even though they are dressed in the old ideologies of |
|
political fight and political insurgency, and unfortunately |
|
some other countries in the region respond to that disguise, |
|
they try to justify many times their crimes. |
|
In response to your current question, currently there are |
|
approximately 10,000 narcotics terrorists that used to be |
|
called guerillas. |
|
Mr. Barr. Is military aid from the United States to |
|
Colombia being used to defeat the narco-guerillas? |
|
General Bedoya. The terms under which the military |
|
assistance from the United States is supplied to Colombia does |
|
not allow its use in the fight against guerillas. That is |
|
because there has not been established in the eyes of the |
|
public a relationship, a direct relationship between guerilla |
|
groups and narcotics traffickers. |
|
Mr. Barr. But it is our government leaders that make these |
|
decisions, and in your view, have our leaders in this country |
|
been given sufficient information to clearly understand that |
|
these are one and the same enemy that we are fighting? |
|
General Bedoya. Locally, it is understood and a well-known |
|
fact that this relationship exists. Regionally, it is well- |
|
understood and recognized that this relationship exists. Many |
|
times, much information has been given to the United States |
|
Embassy in Colombia, and some of that information showing this |
|
relationship, setting out how it operates, the General has here |
|
with him, and wishes to give it to the subcommittee so that |
|
relationship can be more clearly understood. |
|
Mr. Barr. Thank you. |
|
Mr. Chairman, might I ask unanimous consent those documents |
|
be made part of the record. |
|
Mr. Hastert. Without objection, so ordered. |
|
[Note.--The information referred to can be found in |
|
subcommittee files.] |
|
Mr. Barr. Thank you. |
|
Would it be or is it a mistake to block the use of funds |
|
from the United States to be used against narco-guerillas |
|
simply because some people may say there is no connection |
|
between the guerillas and the narcotics traffickers? |
|
General Bedoya. It is a mistake, because in Colombia the |
|
groups that used to call themselves guerillas are now narcotics |
|
traffickers. We have films that have been produced by these |
|
same groups, in which they show themselves producing, |
|
processing, and trafficking in these illicit substances. That |
|
is why these groups get so much funding and that is why these |
|
groups have airplanes and are able to use tremendous resources |
|
to fight us. |
|
Mr. Barr. Just one very quick final question, Mr. Chairman. |
|
I appreciate the extra time. |
|
Speaking of weapons, can you tell us what sort of weapons |
|
the narco-guerillas have available and are using to kill your |
|
men and to stop your efforts to go after them? |
|
General Bedoya. These groups principally use the AK-47 |
|
that, as you know, has European origin, Eastern European |
|
origin. They even have rockets and different sorts of munitions |
|
that come from the same source. There are other types of |
|
munitions that come from other sources, but they are secondary |
|
sources. |
|
Mr. Barr. So would it be fair to say that these groups are |
|
very well armed, and that your inability to continue to get |
|
ammunition and defensive weapons systems, such as the mini-gun, |
|
is putting your men at a real disadvantage? |
|
General Bedoya. These narcotics traffickers get their |
|
weapons from the international arms dealers and many times it |
|
is a drugs-for-weapons exchange. |
|
Mr. Barr. Insofar as they purchase their weapons with |
|
money, is that money that is coming directly from drug |
|
consumers? |
|
General Bedoya. Yes. Basically the moneys that they use to |
|
purchase these weapons comes from the areas of cultivation, the |
|
areas of production, and there is some evidence that they even |
|
have some exporting capacities. |
|
Mr. Barr. Do we see any evidence that other terrorist |
|
groups outside of Colombia are involved? |
|
General Bedoya. The specific evidence we have is |
|
specifically related to the FARC, that is definitive. Regarding |
|
other groups, it is very possible that they also participate. |
|
We don't have specific evidence as of yet, but we do know that |
|
they do gain their funds and they do supply the funds that they |
|
acquire through kidnapping. |
|
Mr. Barr. Thank you. |
|
Thank you, Mr. Chairman. |
|
Mr. Hastert. I thank the gentleman. |
|
I would like to finish with just a series of questions |
|
that, if you could just answer them very briefly, what we are |
|
trying to do is to establish something in the record that I |
|
think pulls together a lot of your testimony today. |
|
First of all, on the issue of the guerillas, ELN and FARC, |
|
originally, my understanding is these groups were freedom |
|
fighters in their own minds, leftist guerillas that were |
|
ideologically trying to overthrow the government because they |
|
believed that their philosophy was superior. Is that still the |
|
truth today or are they still an ideological group, or are they |
|
driven by narco-funds, in your opinion? |
|
General Bedoya. At the end of the cold war they no longer |
|
could get their funds from other sources, including the Soviet |
|
Union. Now they get their resources from drug traffickers. |
|
Mr. Hastert. The other part of that question is, however |
|
they get their money, are they still driven by an ideology, in |
|
your opinion? |
|
General Bedoya. They no longer are driven by ideology. They |
|
have converted themselves into common criminals and now move |
|
along those lines. |
|
Mr. Hastert. To follow up, you say in your testimony today |
|
that they take approximately 25 percent of the proceeds from |
|
the drugs grown, manufactured, transported in their areas of |
|
operation; is that true? |
|
General Serrano. Absolutely true. The truth is, the sad |
|
truth is that in that area, the tax collector is the FARC. |
|
Mr. Hastert. Is it also true, from other testimony that we |
|
have had prior to today, that these organizations have |
|
committed transgressions against humanity, they, in a sense, |
|
have no regard for people's civil rights, and the operation of |
|
protecting drugs and the growing of drugs, the manufacture of |
|
drugs and the transportation of drugs is the No. 1 importance; |
|
human rights are not important to these people? |
|
General Serrano. They violate all sorts of rights, |
|
including human rights. In the cocaine processing laboratories, |
|
we find young children of 13 years old that have been pressed |
|
into labor. They also exploit women and children, and whoever |
|
attempts to communicate to the legitimate authorities the |
|
existence of any movement of cocaine or the existence of a |
|
processing laboratory is immediately assassinated. |
|
Each group of these different organizations has a band of |
|
assassins that they use to make sure that the law of silence is |
|
enforced and that the different debts are paid. But the worst |
|
violation they commit is the poisoning of Colombia's youth. |
|
Mr. Hastert. To follow up on that, could you give me--we |
|
know that the kidnappings are rampant, that civilian murder is |
|
rampant. Can you give us a number about in the last year how |
|
many murders have been committed and how many kidnappings have |
|
been perpetrated, to the best of your knowledge? |
|
General Serrano. Last year, in Colombia, there were 1,200 |
|
kidnappings. We were able to rescue 250. Sixty percent of the |
|
kidnappings that occur in Colombia are carried out by the |
|
narcotics guerillas. |
|
Mr. Hastert. How about murders? |
|
General Serrano. About 10 percent of these kidnappings end |
|
in the assassination of the people that have been kidnapped. On |
|
a general level, all told, per year, there are about 28,000 |
|
murders. |
|
Mr. Hastert. 28,000 murders. |
|
General Serrano. Yes, 28,000 murders per year. |
|
Mr. Hastert. Second point. According to other testimony |
|
that we have been able to accrue, is it not true, systematic |
|
recruitment of children and kidnapping the children by the FARC |
|
and ELN have taken place to press these children into service |
|
for narco-trafficking purposes? |
|
General Bedoya. In the different documents and in the video |
|
that we will be giving to you, you will find children of |
|
different ages that are kidnapped from 10 or 11 years old and |
|
are kept within the criminal organization all their lives. This |
|
is a reality that is ongoing in Colombia. |
|
Mr. Hastert. Is it true that an area known in your country |
|
as Miraflores, which is approximately the size of the State of |
|
Texas, that that area is virtually overrun with guerillas and |
|
narco-traffickers? |
|
General Serrano. While it was true in the past, ever since |
|
we started the operations last year, the control of this zone |
|
by the narcotics traffickers and the guerillas is being |
|
eliminated. That situation will come under control. It is |
|
specifically in that area where the efforts to fumigate are |
|
concentrated. |
|
Mr. Hastert. The capability to move into that area and to |
|
control it and the FARC, to fight the guerillas and narco- |
|
traffickers depends upon the use of DC-3s and Huey helicopters |
|
and other equipment you have got; is that true or not true? |
|
General Serrano. As far as the police are concerned, the |
|
ability to carry out these efforts relies on the airplanes that |
|
are used for the fumigation and on the DC-3s and on the |
|
helicopters. |
|
A brief example so that you might understand further: When |
|
an airplane leaves on a fumigation run, the actual illicit |
|
crops are to be found more than an hour's flight away and the |
|
plane must hastily perform the fumigation runs and return so |
|
that it will have enough fuel to make the entire run. It is a |
|
completely--it is an area that is completely overrun by jungle |
|
and that is very far away from the normal means of |
|
transportation. |
|
Mr. Hastert. Any holding up of that equipment because of |
|
decertification by our country to your country has a serious |
|
consequence of the transportation, the growing, manufacturing |
|
and transportation of drugs back into this country; is that |
|
true or not, in your opinion? |
|
General Serrano. The decertification affects not only |
|
Colombia's morale but it also affects the logistics of the |
|
operation. It also divides the countries into supposedly, good |
|
guys, and supposedly, bad guys. It has a direct effect on the |
|
ability to procure spare parts, in the procurement of weapons |
|
and explosives. |
|
Mr. Hastert. In effect, you are facing, basically, a civil |
|
war within your nation because of this constant turmoil driven |
|
by the profits from narcotics. How much longer, with limited-- |
|
maybe this is not a fair question. With limited ability to |
|
fight these problems, how much longer can you sustain this |
|
without added help? |
|
General Serrano. It is a war that is being fought between |
|
the narcotics traffickers and the Colombian Armed Forces. We do |
|
not know how long it will take to see what effects the |
|
reduction in the entry of precursor chemicals, on the reduction |
|
in consumption. All of these different elements, we do not know |
|
how long it will take for them to have an effect on the war. |
|
Without help, narcotics trafficking will rise, and without |
|
help, without aid, we will not be able to last for very long. |
|
The antinarcotics division of the police is--uses fundamentally |
|
the assistance that is received from the United States. Without |
|
that assistance, they could not function the way they do. |
|
General Bedoya. In Colombia, there is no civil war as such. |
|
What we are talking about are simple criminal activities of |
|
narcotics traffickers and terrorists that direct their |
|
activities against the Colombian institutions and the Colombian |
|
people themselves. |
|
Mr. Hastert. I think the use of civil war is probably a bad |
|
choice, but it is an imperative struggle between, in essence, |
|
good and bad. |
|
For the record, so that the record is clear, and whatever |
|
other record that we have been able to establish here today, |
|
has President Samper ever prevented either one of you from a |
|
wholesale attack on narco-traffickers? |
|
General Serrano. Never. In the 2 years that I have been the |
|
director, there has never been any interference in our |
|
activities. Quite to the contrary, before we were able to |
|
capture the members of the Cali Cartel, there was a lot of |
|
pressure that we get that done. |
|
Mr. Hastert. Thank you. |
|
I want to put myself out on a limb, two things I would like |
|
to say. First of all, I try not to put myself on a limb very |
|
often, but General Serrano and General Bedoya, certainly your |
|
efforts, I think, have been heroic. That is in the reports we |
|
have had, I was able to confirm that visiting your company, I |
|
was able to talk to many, many people in your country, in the |
|
southern hemisphere, and in this country. |
|
General, your efforts are certainly our best hopes for the |
|
plague that is upon us, upon our children, upon this country, |
|
and upon the citizens that want to live a decent life. It |
|
affects our people almost as badly as it affects your people. |
|
We hope that we can win this war and that we can have peace |
|
from the plague of drugs. |
|
It takes a great effort on nations and politicians, elected |
|
officials, and people who serve your country such as yourself. |
|
I think, I don't know how you would ever put together a |
|
nomination for a Nobel Peace Prize, but I think you are |
|
certainly deserving by your fine effort. I hope that we can say |
|
we support you and this country is behind you all the way. When |
|
you have to talk to the next widow in the next funeral you go |
|
to, I hope you express that we stand behind you as well. |
|
Thank you for your testimony. |
|
At this time, I would ask for our final panel to come |
|
forward. Certainly it has been an overwhelming experience today |
|
to have the first two panels before us, but you will not be |
|
disappointed in the third panel, I can tell you that. |
|
I would like to welcome at this time, Ambassador Morris |
|
Busby and Major Andy Messing. Ambassador Busby served as the |
|
United States Ambassador to Colombia. I have been able to visit |
|
Colombia, have the privilege and the benefit of his insights. |
|
Major Messing has retired from the Army after 21 years of |
|
distinguished service, including service in Special Forces and |
|
Special Operations for over 18 years. He has had firsthand |
|
experience in the jungles of Colombia. |
|
Gentlemen, if you will both stand and raise your right |
|
hands, our committee rules require me to swear you in. |
|
[Witness sworn.] |
|
Mr. Hastert. Let the record show that the witnesses |
|
responded in the affirmative. |
|
|
|
STATEMENTS OF MORRIS BUSBY, FORMER AMBASSADOR TO COLOMBIA; AND |
|
MAJOR F. ANDY MESSING, JR., UNITED STATES ARMY (RET.), |
|
EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, NATIONAL DEFENSE COUNCIL FOUNDATION |
|
|
|
Mr. Hastert. Thank you and please proceed with your |
|
statements. And, Ambassador Busby, if you will begin. |
|
Mr. Busby. Mr. Chairman, thank you. |
|
I would like to thank the committee for the opportunity to |
|
appear here today. I have submitted for the record a short |
|
statement, and, since the hour is going on, perhaps I could |
|
just hit some of the high points. |
|
I was in Colombia at the time that President Samper was |
|
elected and participated in the early moments of disintegration |
|
of the relationship between the United States and Colombia. |
|
I am, as you will notice from the statement, somewhat |
|
critical of our handling of United States-Colombian relations |
|
in the ensuing couple of years. |
|
Mr. Hastert. Mr. Ambassador, would you pull your mike up a |
|
little bit closer, please. |
|
Mr. Busby. Sure. |
|
Mr. Hastert. Thank you. |
|
Mr. Busby. In saying that I am somewhat critical of the way |
|
we have handled this, let me also say that certainly Mr. Samper |
|
gets no kudos from me. I would also like to take this |
|
opportunity to add my voice to those of the many brave and |
|
thoughtful Colombians who have called for him to relinquish the |
|
office of the presidency so the country can begin healing |
|
itself. |
|
Having said that, it is awfully easy to sit here and |
|
criticize what others have done. |
|
I firmly believe that the tools which you, the Congress, as |
|
well as the administration have given to the hands of our |
|
policymakers are inadequate. There was a lot of talk here this |
|
morning about the certification process. I greatly fear that, |
|
as it has evolved, the certification process tends to dominate |
|
useful policy. We see what was described here today, million- |
|
dollar ads in Forbes Magazine, lots of public relations. |
|
The kind of strictures and restrictions that are placed on |
|
our policymakers in that legislation I think need to be |
|
reviewed. |
|
I was, at one time, the deputy chief of mission in Mexico |
|
when Enrique Camarena, our DEA agent, was killed. I was |
|
Ambassador to Colombia for 3 years, and I will tell you that in |
|
circumstances such as those, strict adherence to the |
|
legislation as it is currently drafted is a hindrance rather |
|
than a help to rational policymaking. |
|
As my first statement, I would like to say that I would |
|
recommend that you and the administration review that |
|
legislation to make sure that, as you are currently applying |
|
it, and it has the intent that originally was designed. That's |
|
not to say that I am critical of congressional oversight and, |
|
in fact, as a former member of the executive branch, I will |
|
tell you that I very much recommend to you that you exercise |
|
congressional oversight. It is just that policy has tended to |
|
be made in a public forum where I think oftentimes subtle and |
|
delicate initiatives die a very sure death. |
|
Mr. Chairman, you asked me to specifically comment on the |
|
types and amounts of support that the U.S. Government should |
|
provide to the Government of Colombia. I greatly fear that, |
|
given the animosity that we currently feel toward the Colombian |
|
administration, that the situation in Colombia is not going to |
|
improve as long as Mr. Samper is in office. I would certainly |
|
hope that, until that occurs, we do not abandon the cause for |
|
which so many Colombians have given their lives. I have the |
|
greatest admiration for the gentlemen who just appeared before |
|
you, and I think they deserve our support. In fact, I do |
|
believe that it is essential that we as a government continue |
|
to support the Colombian counternarcotics forces. |
|
As much as we disapprove of Mr. Samper, we should recognize |
|
that it's unlikely that he is going to depart before the end of |
|
his term. There's no doubt about our animosity toward him. We |
|
have taken away his visa. What more public demonstration could |
|
there be? I think it's ludicrous to argue that giving aid to |
|
the counternarcotics forces is going to help him politically or |
|
that to withhold it is going to weaken him further. The die has |
|
been cast, and we should act in what is our own self-interest. |
|
I also could not help smiling as I heard some of the |
|
questions and answers relating to the so-called guerrillas in |
|
Colombia. I will tell you with certainty, Mr. Barr, and Mr. |
|
Chairman, that during the entire 3 years I was there, I sent |
|
reams of paper and facts and figures laying out for the |
|
government, our government, the relationships between the FARC |
|
and the ELN and the narcotics traffickers. I made countless |
|
recommendations that we should, in fact, recognize that |
|
relationship in policy and that we needed to work with the |
|
Colombian military and the Colombian police in combating the |
|
ELN and FARC. I had these mental images of the Washington |
|
establishment sort of levitating and shaking every time I would |
|
send these cables up. |
|
My sense has been that the problem is twofold. One, there |
|
is a broad perception that, if we were to work with the |
|
Colombian military and police on the FARC and the ELN problem, |
|
that somehow we are going to get ourselves immersed in a |
|
terrible human rights problem. The second problem is that I |
|
think that we, as a government, recognize the complexity of |
|
this situation and have decided not to get involved in it. |
|
But to my mind, I will tell you that I am firmly convinced |
|
that, so long as the FARC and the ELN continue in the numbers |
|
that they are and so long as they continue their relationship |
|
with the narcotics traffickers, we can pour money into Colombia |
|
on counternarcotics. But if we continue to say it can only be |
|
used for counternarcotics purposes, and we have these very, |
|
very tight, end-use provisions that we have to adhere to, you |
|
will not solve that narcotics problem in Colombia. |
|
That may not be true elsewhere, but in Colombia, the two |
|
are so inextricably linked that it is a true head-in-the-sand |
|
attitude to think you can look at counternarcotics and not look |
|
at the FARC and the ELN in that relationship. I think that is |
|
something which this committee could perhaps take a leadership |
|
role in. |
|
Finally, Mr. Chairman, I would like to make a point that |
|
has been alluded to but no one has addressed it directly, and |
|
that is I would like to recommend that you and your colleagues |
|
consider the funding levels for some of the infrastructure |
|
development programs. By that, I am referring to programs to |
|
aid in the administration of justice and, in particular, |
|
military and police training. I think that these are programs |
|
which have tended to fall by the wayside as a part of the |
|
certification process and there's nothing that we do in these |
|
countries which is as valuable and which has such long-term |
|
benefits as bringing Colombian police and military officers to |
|
the United States for training, having a true interaction |
|
between our military and police, who function in a truly |
|
democratic society, setting an example for them and providing |
|
them with the tools that they need. The same thing is true with |
|
the administration of justice program. There was a $34 million |
|
program when I was in Colombia. I was very strongly supportive |
|
of it. |
|
The institutions of government, and in particular the |
|
institutions of justice in these countries, are very weak and |
|
it is something that we need to work on if we truly are looking |
|
for a longtime solution. |
|
Mr. Chairman, again, thank you for the opportunity to |
|
testify before you, and I will respond to any of the questions |
|
that you or any other members may have. |
|
[The prepared statement of Mr. Busby follows:] |
|
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T9818.027 |
|
|
|
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T9818.028 |
|
|
|
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T9818.029 |
|
|
|
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T9818.030 |
|
|
|
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T9818.031 |
|
|
|
Mr. Hastert. Thank you, Mr. Ambassador. |
|
Mr. Messing, Major. |
|
Mr. Messing. Thank you, Mr. Chairman, for allowing me to |
|
testify. As the executive director of the National Defense |
|
Council Foundation in the study of antidrug operations, I have |
|
been to Colombia nine times since 1985, my last trip being in |
|
mid-January. Coincidentally, since you mentioned Miraflores, |
|
that's one of the end points that I went to. |
|
Colombia is 1 of 15 countries that I have been to in |
|
analyzing this dark side capitalist phenomenon which adversely |
|
affects America on socioeconomic, political and security |
|
levels. |
|
In my first trip to Colombia, the American Embassy staff |
|
arranged for me to visit the then ``special anti-narcotics |
|
unit,'' SANU. This group of heroic men were in the first |
|
element of drug fighters which were supported by American |
|
agencies. Ironically, at the time, they were not really |
|
supported by their own government, and most of the men I met |
|
with then have since been killed. |
|
However, times have changed. In my latest visits, it is |
|
clear to me that the key government elements are dedicated to |
|
reducing the drug threat to their society and ours. |
|
Accordingly, the catalytic event to their metanoia was the |
|
assassination of a Presidential candidate in 1989. That rocked |
|
their nation and awakened their nomenclature. They finally |
|
understood that this was no longer just a Gringo problem but |
|
their problem, too. It actually became a threat to their |
|
national security, their sovereignty and their way of life. |
|
They then understood that this tiny group of narcissistic and |
|
hedonistic criminals were impacting their ability to have a |
|
democracy and operate a positive light side capitalist |
|
structure. Because I bifurcate capitalism into dark side and |
|
light side capitalism, and it gives you an ability to talk in a |
|
different level when you do that. |
|
Every part of their society, i.e., their politics, their |
|
sociocultural and economic being, and their safety was in |
|
jeopardy. It was no longer--it no longer was a cash cow to |
|
jump-start their economy, as their economy had its own |
|
vitality, as has already been testified to. Plain and simply |
|
put, it became a contest of survival. |
|
Fortunately, there was a stalwart and honest core of |
|
Colombians that were prepared to lead the counterattack against |
|
this strong and greedy foe. Men like General Serrano, who just |
|
testified, and women like Foreign Minister Emma Mejia, |
|
understood the risks and acted in the best interests of all. |
|
Now, they need our help to press this counterattack on this |
|
transforming and growing scourge. |
|
In the late 1980's, the initial drug operators were urban |
|
based, dark side businessmen. By the mid-80's, their buying |
|
power allowed them to rent key guerilla elements to provide |
|
them security, buy off authorities, they were able to buy off |
|
authorities and buy into legitimate businesses. When they |
|
committed acts that went beyond the pale in the late 1980's and |
|
into the early 1990's, the key groups in government which were |
|
led by the then-vetted national police, went after this heinous |
|
leadership. |
|
As this management group was rolled up in the early 1990's, |
|
America's support, which had been increasing and as a matter of |
|
fact, under a lot of the leadership of Ambassador Busby sitting |
|
next to me, reduced markedly beginning in January 1993 with the |
|
election of a new administration. At the same time, the rural |
|
based guerrillas who had been the apprentices to these drug |
|
lords filled the void left by apprehended drug lords. |
|
As this all occurred, America effected a reduction in |
|
support and even applied decertification into the mix, because |
|
of the Samper equation. This--because of this, a scandal |
|
emerged focusing on Colombian President Samper having taken |
|
some $6 million into his election efforts from drug sources. |
|
Like our own President Clinton, who is caught up in a |
|
similar problem with the Indonesian Lippo Bank, and now we are |
|
finding out the Chinese Government infusing money into-- |
|
allegedly infusing money into the democratic mechanism, party |
|
mechanism, Samper has allowed antidrug forces to strike at the |
|
heart of drug apparatus in the interests of all concerned. |
|
Meanwhile, as a distortion of this picture, the State |
|
Department and select others have harped on a flawed strategy |
|
of bifurcating the now drug guerrillas from the drug trade in |
|
spite of overwhelming open source evidence to the contrary. |
|
This is an important point I might bring up, and even a U.S. |
|
Interagency Intelligence Report proving this fact, which the |
|
administration is not releasing until apparently after the |
|
March certification issue is settled. |
|
This affects our support and modus operandi in addition to |
|
interjecting the Presidential politics of both countries. Alas, |
|
and in a curious fashion, nowhere is to be seen the United |
|
States or international environmental or animal rights groups, |
|
as thousands of square miles of virgin, triple canopy jungle |
|
and millions of animals and fish have been eradicated while |
|
rivers have been polluted from drug chemicals because of the |
|
drug trade. Furthermore, human rights groups seem reluctant to |
|
comment on the rights of victims of the drug trade or against |
|
the drug guerrillas. Additionally, and in that regard, four |
|
Americans are being held hostage by these elements as we speak. |
|
Several--three of the hostages have been held for over 4 years. |
|
In conclusion, the confusing combination of politics, |
|
economic interests and other factors should not hide the |
|
salient fact that to not help the good guys in Colombia and |
|
elsewhere, those in the first trench of the drug war, will mean |
|
America will have to deal with the problem closer to home, |
|
initially on our border but then in our neighborhoods. Each |
|
time it gets closer to us, it is more expensive in terms of |
|
lives and money. To be even more plain, to not help our |
|
friends, maybe even hurt them, means an additional 40 to 50 |
|
tons of cocaine and 1 to 2 tons of heroin, worth over $500 |
|
million, on to our streets in the next 12-month period. |
|
This will cause an additional $50 billion to $60 billion |
|
worth of collateral damage to America. The question to this |
|
august body, are you prepared to act to prevent this? |
|
America can engage in antidrug actions while not |
|
sacrificing our principles and promoting better conduct on the |
|
part of our allies. We need to not act like a kid taking away |
|
the football so the game stops, causing volumes of good guys |
|
and innocents to die in Colombia and paving the way for |
|
increased turmoil in our own country. Therefore, this |
|
foundation recommends that the certification of Colombia go |
|
forward immediately, as it is in the best interest of both |
|
countries. This, with the understanding made with Colombia, |
|
that the rule of law and human rights are an important aspect |
|
in the conduct of this conflict. |
|
Thank you, Mr. Chairman. |
|
I would also like to ask that a confidential report that we |
|
had made in the past few days, which we have embargoed until |
|
today, be admitted into the testimony. |
|
Mr. Hastert. Without objection. |
|
Mr. Messing. Thank you, sir. |
|
[The prepared statement of Mr. Messing, and the report |
|
referred to follow:] |
|
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T9818.032 |
|
|
|
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T9818.033 |
|
|
|
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T9818.034 |
|
|
|
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T9818.035 |
|
|
|
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T9818.036 |
|
|
|
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T9818.037 |
|
|
|
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T9818.038 |
|
|
|
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T9818.039 |
|
|
|
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T9818.040 |
|
|
|
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T9818.041 |
|
|
|
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T9818.042 |
|
|
|
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T9818.043 |
|
|
|
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T9818.044 |
|
|
|
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T9818.045 |
|
|
|
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T9818.046 |
|
|
|
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T9818.047 |
|
|
|
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T9818.048 |
|
|
|
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T9818.049 |
|
|
|
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T9818.050 |
|
|
|
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T9818.051 |
|
|
|
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T9818.052 |
|
|
|
Mr. Hastert. Thank you, gentlemen. |
|
Representative Barr. |
|
Mr. Barr. Thank you, Mr. Chairman. |
|
Ambassador Busby, were you here for the testimony earlier |
|
today? |
|
Mr. Busby. Yes, sir. |
|
Mr. Barr. OK. Then both by way of that and by way certainly |
|
of your own personal background in service to our country, you |
|
are well aware of the things that we have been talking about, |
|
including the references to the--let me get the citation here-- |
|
22 U.S.C. Section 2364, the provisions under both (a)(1), |
|
regarding the President's ability to furnish assistance |
|
notwithstanding other findings and other laws, as well as |
|
subsection (a)(2), regarding sales. In your experience and with |
|
your knowledge of these sorts of authorities and how they have |
|
been used or not used in the past, is it appropriate to |
|
recommend consideration by the President of the authority under |
|
(a)(1), as well as under (a)(2), to try and get as much as we |
|
can to the enforcement authorities in Colombia to meet the |
|
challenge posed to them by the narcotics and grower groups? |
|
Mr. Busby. Well, I confess to you that I am not as familiar |
|
with the law as what you give me credit for. In the broadest |
|
sense, let me just say that I think that absolutely we need to |
|
find a mechanism, either within that law or we need to modify |
|
that law, which will permit us to express our extreme |
|
displeasure with the political leadership of a country such as |
|
Colombia, and we are displeased with them and we should be |
|
displeased with them, but at the same time permit us to go |
|
forward with assistance to gentlemen like Generals Bedoya and |
|
Serrano. Absolutely that is what we should do if there is |
|
agreement, from a policy point of view, between the |
|
administration and you gentlemen. |
|
Now, how one goes about doing that and whether you can do |
|
that within the structure of the legislation as it currently |
|
exists, I am not sure. That would be something which the |
|
lawyers would have to examine. |
|
I will also say that in my experience, often people on both |
|
sides of that question hide behind that law. I think that if |
|
everyone agreed, we would always find a way to get around the |
|
restrictions of the law. But from a policy point of view, |
|
absolutely what you are suggesting is what I would recommend; |
|
yes, sir. |
|
Mr. Barr. Thank you. |
|
I have really been quite impressed with the imaginative use |
|
and interpretation of Federal laws by this administration when |
|
they want to. For example, last year, we heard testimony from |
|
some individuals from this administration with regard to how it |
|
is that the resources of the FBI can be used to investigate a |
|
purely domestic crime in Haiti. There are a number of folks, |
|
including myself, that suspected that decision was made for |
|
purely political reasons, not under Federal laws. And I have a |
|
serious question about their very imaginative and very broad |
|
interpretation of that particular statute. |
|
Yet in this case they seem to be relying on very, very |
|
pinched legalistic definitions and interpretations of these |
|
laws such as prevents, for example, as we heard from the last |
|
panel, the use of even the limited military assistance that |
|
this administration is willing to provide to the army and to |
|
the police forces down there, telling them they can only use it |
|
to go after the narcotics people and not the guerrillas when, |
|
in fact, I think that it is very, very well documented and well |
|
known to this administration and prior administrations that the |
|
two groups really are operating hand in hand. I don't know if |
|
there's a question in all of that, but something that you said |
|
triggered that. |
|
Mr. Busby. Let me put myself back into one of my previous |
|
incarnations. |
|
I went through something very similar to this, about 3\1/2\ |
|
or 4 years ago, and I was very, very intent on gaining some |
|
public recognition from the U.S. Government that there was a |
|
linkage between the narcotics traffickers and the guerilla |
|
groups. I mean, that was my objective, to do that, because if-- |
|
once we could establish that, then, of course, the next step, |
|
which was beginning to work with them on the guerilla problem, |
|
became easier. |
|
People basically said: Well, if you want to do that, you go |
|
right ahead but expect to be sued, expect someone to come up |
|
and use the law against you as a public official for not |
|
adhering to the end-use provisions that are built into the law |
|
that say you will not use this equipment for anything other |
|
than counternarcotics purposes. If you want to make the policy |
|
determination that going after the FARC is a counternarcotics |
|
purpose, do so at your peril. |
|
Those are the kinds of problems that you run into when you |
|
have conflicting legislation and people who take various |
|
positions on various issues. That's a serious thing. |
|
Mr. Barr. Not exactly a standing-tall foreign policy type |
|
decisionmaking process. |
|
Mr. Busby. I like to think that I stood as tall as anyone; |
|
but when someone tells me that I am going to jail because I |
|
make a policy determination, I tend to listen to what they say. |
|
Mr. Barr. Well, I would question that sort of advice. I |
|
mean, when I was in the executive branch at the CIA, for |
|
example, we would go to legal counsel to make sure that there |
|
is a way within the bounds of the law to do something. If you-- |
|
if the question is posed to these folks, give me a reason not |
|
to do something, now that's a lot easier. But I am somewhat |
|
disturbed, particularly in light of what the former two |
|
witnesses, the two generals from Colombia have told us, that |
|
there is very, very clear documentation, well known to this |
|
administration, that these two groups, the guerilla groups and |
|
the narcotics trafficking groups, are operating essentially as |
|
one organization, one paying the other a large percent of the |
|
profits, and yet they rely on these very pinched |
|
interpretations. I suspect it's for policy reasons they have |
|
made that decision because they want to. |
|
With regard to the specific--the specific point--one other |
|
specific point that I forget which one of the generals made, |
|
that it would help them tremendously if we could take a look |
|
here in this country at perhaps strengthening or modifying in |
|
some way our laws to prevent the introduction of precursor |
|
chemicals into Colombia, are you familiar with that? Are there |
|
some specific things, perhaps from a policy standpoint, in your |
|
experience, that you could tell us that we should specifically |
|
be looking at there? |
|
Mr. Busby. Yes, sir. We in the United States some years ago |
|
began to recognize that tracking precursor chemicals and |
|
tracking money was really a very effective way to get at the |
|
organizational infrastructure of the traffickers. We, the |
|
Americans, have done a pretty good job at that, in my opinion. |
|
Where you run into problems, in my experience, and I saw |
|
this in Colombia, is when you try to take the next step and |
|
engage the international community, when you go to the Germans, |
|
to the French, to the Swiss, to other manufacturers and say |
|
that we want you to impose on your industries all of these |
|
tracking provisions and end-use provisions for chemicals that |
|
are precursors. That has been an international initiative |
|
which, in my experience, has gone virtually nowhere. |
|
We have tried to do that with the Colombians and certainly |
|
under Cesar Gaviria, the previous president, they were very |
|
much in support of that. |
|
I am not aware, frankly, that we, the United States, are |
|
deserving of any rocks being thrown our way on that. We have |
|
taken some really very effective measures. But I do believe |
|
that the international community--that it's an initiative which |
|
we need to pursue and pursue very strongly. |
|
I tend to believe in the efficiency of that. I do think |
|
that if you could cutoff the flow of chemicals--money without |
|
saying, but if you could cutoff the flow of chemicals or put |
|
some real strictures on that, you could put--you could put the |
|
traffickers at considerable risk. A lot of those chemicals come |
|
up river from Brazil. |
|
Mr. Barr. There is no initiative from the administration at |
|
this point to even look at that, much less propose legislation, |
|
is there? |
|
Mr. Busby. I am sorry. I have been out of the government |
|
for a couple of years. I really don't know the current state of |
|
play. |
|
Mr. Barr. OK. There isn't. |
|
Mr. Messing, you, as Mr. Busby, have experience in a lot of |
|
different countries, including Colombia and another country |
|
mentioned today, Mexico. From your background and knowledge of |
|
the--both the political and the police and military situations |
|
in both of these countries, could you just very, very briefly |
|
compare the integrity and the efforts of the Colombian anti- |
|
narcotics efforts, particularly General Serrano and his troops |
|
and General Bedoya and his troops, to their counterparts in |
|
Mexico? |
|
Mr. Messing. Well, you have to understand that these |
|
organizations will always have some thin layer of corruption, |
|
as our own police forces do and our own military does in some |
|
respect. I mean, there will be a very thin layer of corruption |
|
in both of the militaries. You will have some group that will-- |
|
a cellular group that will be involved in death squad |
|
activities. You will have some very small group that will be |
|
involved in corruption; they have been corrupted by the drug |
|
lords. But for the most part, the Colombians have had an |
|
aggressive program, particularly in the police, to vet their |
|
elements. As a matter of fact, several years ago, there were, |
|
you know, literally 6,000, to 7,000 police vetted from their |
|
national police force over a period of time. |
|
This is a good indicator. It shows progress toward them |
|
doing the right thing. So in terms of whether I am comfortable |
|
with the Colombian national police versus the Mexican national |
|
police, who haven't gone through this severe vetting program |
|
like the Colombian national police, I would prefer to work with |
|
the Colombian national police. |
|
But having said that, you always have to encourage them to |
|
continue vetting and, you know, the police and the military. |
|
One of the programs that the Ambassador mentioned has an |
|
astounding effect on the viability of these forces. It is joint |
|
training that we have with those elements. It's very important, |
|
because they learn through osmosis and directly that human |
|
rights is important; that proper conduct is important. They |
|
learn civic action. They learn a whole plethora of ideas from |
|
us that they take back to their country, and these ideas will |
|
help the police and military move toward the democratization of |
|
their country while lowering levels of violence. That's what |
|
this is all about. |
|
Mr. Barr. You did mention the term civil rights--human |
|
rights and we talked about that, as you know, from being here |
|
during the previous two panels. Would you and, Ambassador |
|
Busby, if you could both just comment very, very briefly on |
|
this human rights issue, and in particular where should the |
|
real focus of our concern over human rights violations in |
|
Colombia be with regard to the narcotics traffickers and the |
|
narcotics organizations and the guerrillas or with the police |
|
and military forces, which we all know in any country, as you |
|
said, are not perfect. Where ought to our concern over human |
|
rights be? |
|
Mr. Busby. Well, let me just say several things about that, |
|
because it was an issue that was of great concern the whole |
|
time I was there. First, I think it is indisputable that there |
|
are human rights problems within the police and the military in |
|
Colombia. The evidence is clearly there. |
|
Having said that, it is also indisputable that the |
|
leadership of those organizations neither condones it nor |
|
supports it and, in fact, are working very, very hard to try |
|
and root out human rights abuses. They do try and train their |
|
people. There is no institutional bias toward human rights |
|
abuses but, rather, the contrary. |
|
Mr. Barr. That, I think, is a very important distinction. |
|
Mr. Busby. Yes, sir. |
|
My feeling is that many of the human rights abuses in |
|
Colombia occur because they are--it may not be a civil war, but |
|
they are a country at war with themselves. Because of the |
|
immaturity of the justice system, both civilly and within the |
|
military, that police and military many times feel enormous |
|
frustration, that they can go arrest somebody or they can do |
|
these things and nothing ever really happens. And, therefore, |
|
out of frustration---- |
|
Mr. Barr. Something else may happen. |
|
Mr. Busby. Something else happens. |
|
Mr. Barr. Like the frustration in this country sometimes. |
|
Mr. Busby. That goes to the point I tried to make at the |
|
end of my very brief statement. |
|
I think one of the focuses of our efforts should be on |
|
building those institutions up so that, in fact, you remove |
|
that level of frustration and, in fact, you bring the rule of |
|
law to these countries. |
|
It's very, very underdeveloped in Colombia, although they |
|
have made some attempts to overhaul their justice system. But |
|
there's a long way to go. |
|
Mr. Barr. Excuse me. Does decertification help that process |
|
or hamper it? |
|
Mr. Busby. Oh, I think it hurts it. I mean, I think the |
|
whole certification process, as I have said to Congressman |
|
Mica, who helped draft that legislation, I am rather critical |
|
of that because I think it does, in many ways, hinder our |
|
ability to pick and choose what we want to do. |
|
Mr. Hastert. The gentleman's time has expired. |
|
Mr. Busby. Let me say one additional thing, just following |
|
up on the previous question. I think that one of the |
|
initiatives that we had under way, and I spoke to President |
|
Gaviria about it many times when I was there, is that the |
|
process by which we select our police officers and train them |
|
or our military officers or our government officials is very |
|
different from what you have in these countries. If you--as you |
|
well know, if you want a security clearance in the United |
|
States, you get investigated. You have people talk to your |
|
family. They talk to your neighbors. There is an extensive |
|
background investigation that is done on you before you are |
|
given access to sensitive information, and there is |
|
psychological training for policemen, and so forth. None of |
|
that exists. None of that exists. |
|
I went to see a ranking cabinet officer once in Colombia, |
|
and she said, ``I am really very worried about, you know, |
|
information leaking out of my office, and so forth, and I think |
|
it's my secretary.'' |
|
I said, ``Well, who is she?'' |
|
I don't know. I don't know, you know. |
|
I went into, well, how are these people selected? |
|
Well, they are just hired. |
|
So you have to understand, it's also a very, very difficult |
|
proposition to work in some of these countries trying to decide |
|
who do you work with, who do you not work with, who is corrupt, |
|
who is not corrupt. You only decide that over a period of some |
|
time, sometimes years, making decisions on who you think you |
|
can trust. |
|
So all of these things are correctable, and I think that |
|
they are something that deserves some emphasis from a policy |
|
point of view on our part. |
|
Mr. Hastert. The gentleman from Florida. |
|
Mr. Mica. Thank you, Mr. Chairman. |
|
Ambassador Busby, I heard your comments relating to the |
|
certification law, and I probably have to agree with you that |
|
it hasn't been that effective with Colombia because we don't-- |
|
we really don't even have a handle on that country that the |
|
legislation was originally intended to give us leverage with. |
|
But I am wondering what you think could be an action by |
|
this Congress or this administration to show the Colombians and |
|
others that we mean business. How can we get their attention on |
|
this matter? |
|
Mr. Busby. Well, sir, with regard to the Colombian |
|
leadership, as I said, I find it hard to think of anything else |
|
we could do to display our animosity toward Mr. Samper and the |
|
people around him. I mean, we have taken his visa. We have |
|
publicly castigated him. We have done virtually everything |
|
possible to let him know that we don't like him. As I said |
|
earlier, he gets no kudos from me, either. |
|
The problem I have is that the structure of the |
|
legislation, as I understand it, oftentimes does not allow you |
|
to pick and choose what you are going to do in a particular |
|
country. I think it is--has been not very helpful to cutoff FMS |
|
sales to Colombia. I think that that's just--we should have |
|
avoided that somehow. |
|
I also think that, although there are certain times when |
|
public debate on things like this is very useful, sometimes it |
|
is a hinderance to trying to solve the problem because |
|
everybody tries to make political points. |
|
What I think should happen is that the Congress and the |
|
administration should sit down and look at the whole range of |
|
interconnecting legislation that applies to these kinds of |
|
situations and try to perfect it, try to make it better, more |
|
useful, more flexible, perhaps. I know that implies a certain |
|
level of working together that isn't always there, but I |
|
sincerely believe that. |
|
Mr. Mica. Well, another one of the problems we have, and |
|
Mr. Hastert saw it and his predecessor, Mr. Zeliff, who chaired |
|
this subcommittee, saw the same thing, is this approach and the |
|
legislative remedy or the administrative remedy covers a number |
|
of legislative committees of jurisdiction, a number of |
|
agencies. |
|
We had written to the drug czar asking that the President |
|
request a waiver, and I think that he doesn't--the drug czar |
|
really doesn't have any authority. He is sort of a fancy |
|
coordinator. But we face the same problem here because the |
|
solutions are handled by State, by the Department of Defense, |
|
by the Department of Justice and by other Federal agencies. |
|
Do you see any solution to our jurisdictional problem, any |
|
recommendations? |
|
Mr. Busby. Well, I know, of course, of your long record and |
|
the chairman and other members on this committee of trying to |
|
resolve some of these organizational issues. I will tell you |
|
what I honestly think, and that is that the only person who can |
|
really bring order out of this and make it work is an elected |
|
official, and that's either the President or the Vice |
|
President. |
|
I tend to believe that the Secretary of State is never |
|
going to tell the Secretary of Defense how to spend his money. |
|
Nor do I think that General McCaffrey for all of his abilities |
|
is going to tell the Secretary of State how to conduct foreign |
|
policy, no matter what his so-called title might be. But you |
|
correctly, I think, perceive it, that it is just a coordination |
|
role. |
|
Mr. Mica. Well, I think it has been a lack of executive |
|
leadership, and that's definitely a problem; no interest in the |
|
issue, or limited interest until of late. Then we see the |
|
bureaucratic morass. |
|
Now, State had--we talked about FMS and the President does |
|
have authority to grant a waiver. I cited examples of where |
|
waivers have been granted in much less national interest than |
|
this instance, and nothing still is done as far as FMS and that |
|
military pot. But then I gave examples here and cited back in |
|
September they had asked--or had notified us, they didn't have |
|
to ask--they notified us that State was going to move forward |
|
on providing the Colombians and Peruvians and others with |
|
equipment, and still nothing has been done with that. |
|
How do you get a handle on this? |
|
Mr. Busby. Well, I mean, sir, I think you know the answer |
|
to the question. These are policy issues. These are policy |
|
determinations. Again, my recommendation for some time has been |
|
that we need to look at the organization under which we conduct |
|
counternarcotics--well, our entire drug policy arena, |
|
everything from treatment to demand reduction to our |
|
international programs and everything. |
|
My frustrations, and I worked on this for 15 years or more, |
|
is that it--the same frustration you have. How do you, in fact, |
|
get a handle on all of this and really begin to resolve the |
|
problem? It's a very, very difficult thing to do, the way we |
|
are currently organized and the way you are currently |
|
organized. |
|
That, to my mind, is something that is really worthy of |
|
some effort on the part of the Congress and the administration, |
|
how you do this. |
|
Mr. Mica. One more important thing. Again, I am really |
|
frightened for this country and for every community, knowing |
|
what we saw last year, and you were with us on the trip when |
|
the chairman and others went down to Colombia and we were told |
|
there were 10,000 hectare acres of poppies under production |
|
now. |
|
Is there anything that we can do in this heroin area--and |
|
now it is starting to stream in. We heard testimony today, |
|
Ambassador Gelbard talked about the production, but you are |
|
going to be able to get heroin on the streets of this country |
|
as cheaply as crack in the near term, and availability is |
|
dramatically increased, plus use among the most vulnerable, our |
|
youth. |
|
Is there anything you can do--now, you have been there. You |
|
have been to Colombia as Ambassador. You know the situation |
|
better than anyone. Is there anything you recommend that we can |
|
do to get a handle on this now? |
|
Mr. Busby. Sir, I think that the best thing we can do in |
|
the short term, the best thing we can do, is support General |
|
Serrano and General Bedoya, begin to work with them. Most of |
|
that--most of that opium poppy cultivation, it's a very |
|
organized thing, and the guerrillas are very involved in it. |
|
The FARC is very involved in the heroin production. |
|
In the short term, we need to make sure that the aid is |
|
flowing to these people who are fighting it. |
|
In the long term, I think we need to take a very hard look |
|
at our overall policy of how we are conducting our business |
|
with regard to interdiction, eradication, demand reduction and |
|
all of that, because that's the long-term solution. |
|
Mr. Mica. Finally, I guess you would support then that this |
|
administration, when they come out with their strategy for |
|
1997, drug policy strategy, that interdiction and eradication |
|
would be, I guess, included in that agenda, which has been sort |
|
of cast aside in their past plan? |
|
Mr. Busby. Well, I must say, I tend to agree with General |
|
McCaffrey. I think it's a waste of effort to come out with a |
|
yearly strategy. We ought to have a 10- or 20-year strategy. |
|
Mr. Mica. It is also--as you well know, it's interdiction, |
|
it's education, it's treatment. |
|
Mr. Busby. I was just going to say, I think---- |
|
Mr. Mica. But when it is missing--one of the legs of the |
|
stool is missing, and you have had that policy, it's time to |
|
realize that you have got to approach it from all aspects. |
|
Wouldn't you agree? |
|
Mr. Busby. Yes, sir. |
|
I think--I would say two things. One, organizationally we |
|
need to be able to bring the full power of U.S. capability |
|
against this problem and do it in a focused way, which I don't |
|
think we do very well. |
|
Second, there is no silver bullet to this, and you have to |
|
do all of it. Any administration that thinks that treatment is |
|
going to work and we can do away with the interdiction or the |
|
interdiction is going to work and we can do away with demand |
|
reduction, simply doesn't understand the problem. You have to |
|
do all of these things, and you have to do them over some |
|
extended period of time and destroy the infrastructure by which |
|
the traffickers have been able to build these empires. That's |
|
what we should be doing. |
|
Mr. Mica. Thank you, Mr. Chairman. I yield back. |
|
Mr. Hastert. I thank the gentleman from Florida. |
|
To both of you gentlemen, I appreciate, first of all, your |
|
long endurance this morning to sit through a lot of testimony |
|
and now enduring it yourself here. But to get through this last |
|
round, I would like to ask both of you a couple of questions. |
|
First of all, Ambassador Busby, could you assess previously |
|
the threat posed to our security by narcotraffickers in |
|
Colombia? What do you see? |
|
Mr. Busby. Our security in Colombia? |
|
Mr. Hastert. Our security here, what happens to this |
|
country because of the narcotraffickers? |
|
Mr. Busby. I am sorry? You are talking about what happens |
|
to the United States? |
|
Mr. Hastert. Yes. |
|
Mr. Busby. Well, I admit to being a little bit of a radical |
|
about that. I think, if you look at the history of the United |
|
States, you are hard-pressed to come up with a phenomenon that |
|
has affected us as deeply and adversely as drugs have. I don't |
|
mean just trafficking. I am talking about the use of drugs, |
|
everything that surrounds it. |
|
I think it is, in its purest sense, a real threat to our |
|
society, not necessarily to the institutions of government or-- |
|
drug traffickers are not going to overthrow the U.S. |
|
Government. But seriously, the deterioration that takes place |
|
at various levels of our society I think is marked and |
|
measurable, and therein lies some of the frustration that I |
|
have in our failure to be able to focus all of the capabilities |
|
we have to try and bring about some resolution of the problem. |
|
So I think it's a very clear threat. |
|
Mr. Hastert. Do you feel that the narcotics assistance |
|
section at the Colombian Embassy has been effectively |
|
administrated? |
|
Mr. Busby. It was--it was certainly effectively |
|
administrated when I was there. |
|
I don't know enough about it to really comment on that. |
|
Mr. Hastert. The drug czar has asked, and this is for your |
|
opinion, obviously, has asked that maybe he would have 10 |
|
percent flexibility in his budget, that he can act upon that |
|
budget and implement those funds at his discretion. Do you |
|
think that would be a positive tool? |
|
Mr. Busby. Yes, sir, I do. I do. |
|
Mr. Hastert. Why? |
|
Mr. Busby. I tend to think that a little more centralized |
|
control over budget and policy is what is needed. |
|
Now, again, having said that, I am not so sure that the |
|
President is ever going to be enabled--is never going to be |
|
able to empower one Cabinet officer over the other and, |
|
therefore, Presidential leadership is absolutely essential to |
|
make it happen. But having some more centralized view of all of |
|
this, that is not law enforcement, it is not health, it is not |
|
international but, rather, something else, I think, would be a |
|
good thing. |
|
Mr. Hastert. There has been some questions previously today |
|
trying to compare Mexico to Colombia, and I know that you have |
|
had some experience in both countries, especially the oversight |
|
job that you had as Ambassador on terrorism. How would you |
|
compare General Serrano's record, I guess you would say, of the |
|
Colombian national police on the counternarcotics efforts |
|
compared to what's going on in Mexico at the same type of |
|
level? |
|
Mr. Busby. Well, the history in Colombia is very, very |
|
different from Mexico. The Colombians decided back in the early |
|
1980's that they were going to accept and seek and use United |
|
States assistance. As a result, the Colombian national police, |
|
in particular, have been the recipient of a lot of help from us |
|
which was freely given and which was freely accepted. |
|
Therefore, the working relationships that we have had |
|
historically have had their ups and downs but, nonetheless, |
|
have been very close. |
|
That is not in any way the case in Mexico. In fact, our |
|
relationships with the police in Mexico and with the Mexican |
|
military have been far, far more standoffish, and I think that |
|
the results clearly speak for themselves. |
|
We work and have always worked closely with the Colombians. |
|
I had very high respect for their professionalism and integrity |
|
when I was there. I think the record with Mexico has been far, |
|
far more spotty. |
|
Mr. Hastert. One of the things that General Serrano said, |
|
and he said it in passing, and I am really sure if anybody |
|
picked it up, he said one of the most injurious things that has |
|
happened since the decertification was the inability for--to |
|
get his men training, to get--in how to do things; and they |
|
have had that luxury before with the cooperation from the |
|
United States and, I would imagine, our agencies, DEA, CIA and |
|
other agencies that do that. |
|
In your opinion, has President Clinton's decision to |
|
decertify Colombia on March 1, 1996, had a significant |
|
detrimental effect on the levels of counternarcotics support |
|
Colombia is receiving from the United States via the Department |
|
of State on foreign military sales? |
|
Mr. Busby. Certainly on foreign military sales because it |
|
is my understanding that there are restrictions placed on that. |
|
That's a serious problem, I must say, because you lose IMET, |
|
the training programs, you lose military assistance, you lose a |
|
whole lot of things. |
|
As far as characterizing it as serious or nonserious, and |
|
so forth, I don't have the figures in front of me. I am not |
|
really competent to speak to that. |
|
I have the impression, although it may be anecdotal, that |
|
that is a true statement. |
|
Mr. Hastert. Major Messing, before I recognize you for a |
|
couple of questions, I would like to also recognize, and I see |
|
him in the audience, another dedicated member of the National |
|
Defense Council, Gil Macklin. We certainly appreciate him being |
|
here today. |
|
Let me ask you one of the same questions. Do you feel that |
|
the national assistance section at the Colombia Embassy has |
|
been effectively administered? You have been down there, been |
|
in the jungles. How do you feel about that? |
|
Mr. Messing. Well, I agree with Congressman Mica in terms |
|
of that there's a leadership flaw here. I mean, I go back to El |
|
Salvador. I had 57 trips in El Salvador between 1982 and 1991, |
|
and I saw Ambassador Dean Hinton and Ambassador Tom Pickering |
|
act, and I also worked at the State Department under Ambassador |
|
Rich Armitage. They would pick up the phone, and they would |
|
holler into the phone. All of a sudden a C-141 or a C-5A would |
|
show up and have what the Salvadorians needed or, in the case |
|
of Rich Armitage, when he was working in the NIS section at |
|
State, a C-5A would be landing in Russia, you know, chock full |
|
of medical supplies or whatever was the case. |
|
The point is that the leadership involved is not providing |
|
the pressure and guidance, pressure to their people and |
|
guidance to their people, to get things done. |
|
You know, this failure results in lives of Colombian |
|
policemen being lost, and that's later translated into |
|
additional cocaine on our streets; and it involves collateral |
|
damage to the United States. |
|
So, you know, without this enthusiastic, directed |
|
leadership from Washington, from the Ambassadorial level, from |
|
the section level, you can't get things done. |
|
Mr. Hastert. Can I ask you a question then to followup on |
|
that? |
|
Mr. Messing. Yes. |
|
Mr. Hastert. I think I inferred from your answer, and I am |
|
not trying to put words in your mouth, but are you saying that |
|
people aren't getting out and doing the job they should do, in |
|
your opinion, or are they? |
|
Mr. Messing. Well, there's a whole section in the U.S. drug |
|
control policy and international operations paper that I gave |
|
to you a couple of months ago that talks about personnel |
|
selection. Failure to staff all levels of the drug control |
|
program correctly virtually foredooms it to failure. You know, |
|
when you hire a guy who has just been with the Department of |
|
Agriculture to run a criminal--anticriminal element, who should |
|
be versed--well versed in anti-narcotics operations and who |
|
doesn't mind putting on a bulletproof vest and going out to |
|
Miraflores, and when you hire an agronomist or an agriculture |
|
guy or whatever, you are not going to have the kind of results |
|
that you need. |
|
Fortunately, I heard recently that one of our sterling |
|
State Department anti-narcotics people is being transferred |
|
from another country into Colombia, but he won't be there for a |
|
few months. So you can't have this failure of lack of correct |
|
personnel selection and expect to have results. I mean, it just |
|
doesn't work that way. |
|
You have to have the brightest, the best and the bravest |
|
that are put into a hybrid team, and this talks about it also-- |
|
let's see. There's another section in here. It talks about that |
|
you have--maybe it's in the recommendations portion. But you |
|
have to have a hybrid team of gutsy men and women that are |
|
knowledgeable and experienced to go in and that have the backup |
|
from the United States to go in there and thwart the drug lords |
|
and the drug guerrillas. You have to have this kind of |
|
combination of effort. |
|
Mr. Hastert. Let me ask you a another question that's very |
|
similar to the question I asked Ambassador Busby. How do you-- |
|
as someone that's been underground in Colombia, how do you |
|
assess the national security threat, both to Colombia and the |
|
United States, from narcotraffickers? |
|
Mr. Messing. Well, it is clear to me. I mean, when you have |
|
got---- |
|
Mr. Hastert. Let me interrupt you just for a second. I used |
|
the framework before and I misspoke in addressing the letter |
|
to--or question to the general, I said civil war. I don't mean |
|
civil war, but certainly there's a huge war going on between |
|
two forces. How do you assess that? |
|
Mr. Messing. Well, again, I have to go back to the dark |
|
side/light side capitalist example as one of the things. When |
|
you have dark side capitalist elements that are antidemocratic, |
|
they are monopolistic, and they are a very small element that |
|
tries to take control of the country and impact on its |
|
sovereignty. It's the tail that starts to wag the dog of the |
|
sovereignty of Colombia, in that regard. Their narcissistic |
|
enterprises wind up impacting on us on the streets of America. |
|
Like I said earlier, if you--if this decertification--if |
|
this certification doesn't come through, even a certification |
|
with a waiver of some sort, it will translate directly into 40 |
|
to 50 tons of cocaine on your streets, on Congressman Mica's |
|
city and district, and on the other Members of Congress, where |
|
you feel the impact. The collateral damage is in an exponential |
|
way worse than the amount of assistance that you can provide. |
|
I mean, we are talking $50 billion to $60 billion worth of |
|
collateral damage to the United States as a result of not |
|
certifying, not boosting the morale, not giving them the |
|
equipment they need, not supporting them in the first trench, |
|
the most inexpensive part of the drug war versus--the border |
|
versus our neighborhood. I mean, it's almost goofy, it is |
|
almost goofy not to understand that American interests are |
|
first. |
|
There's a part in here that talks about strategy. This was |
|
written in 1990, because we were critical of the Bush |
|
administration. The point is that in strategy you have to |
|
understand the first priority is the war on drugs, and that |
|
translates into America; and the second is the maintenance of |
|
the country's democratic institutions. |
|
Mr. Hastert. To followup on that, we just had a note handed |
|
to us from our district office that today in Waukegan, IL-- |
|
that's not very far from my district--they just had a bust of |
|
400 pounds of cocaine. That sounds like a tremendous amount of |
|
drug. But in the whole scheme of things, it's just a very small |
|
fraction of what comes out of Colombia. But that did come from |
|
Colombia. |
|
Mr. Messing. Mr. Chairman, drug dealers just tried to buy a |
|
Soviet submarine for the transportation of drugs. |
|
Mr. Hastert. One last question I would like to address to |
|
you, Ambassador. In your opinion, do we face, I guess to coin a |
|
phrase, a chemical laundering problem? We had General Serrano |
|
talking about precursors. We understand that many of these |
|
products come from places like Germany and Holland and other |
|
places, but even from the United States, if we can ship--if |
|
somebody wants to ship a product, tons or thousands of gallons |
|
of product to Poland or the Bahamas or Germany and then it |
|
finds its way back to Colombia, is that a problem? If it is, |
|
how can we start to get a handle on that? |
|
Mr. Busby. Yes, sir, that is a problem. In the tracking of |
|
precursor chemicals, I think DEA and FBI both have whole |
|
sections that do nothing but that. |
|
It is a very difficult proposition because you are talking |
|
about a legal commercial product. |
|
How we get a handle on it? I go back to what I responded to |
|
Mr. Barr. I think the only way you get a real handle on it is |
|
to work with the producing countries of those chemicals to put |
|
some tracking restrictions and end-use restrictions on them, |
|
and also work with Colombia and other countries that produce |
|
drugs to track the importation of those kinds of chemicals. |
|
Mr. Hastert. The question is: How much of that chemical |
|
comes from this country and goes to other countries? |
|
Mr. Busby. I don't know. DEA could give you those figures. |
|
Mr. Hastert. But is it significant? |
|
Mr. Busby. The impression that I have, and I had it from |
|
the time that I was in Colombia, is that we have made some |
|
substantial progress. We, Americans, have made some substantial |
|
progress on that. We have made no progress in terms of |
|
chemicals produced in Brazil, Germany, France, places like |
|
that. |
|
Mr. Hastert. Thank you very much. I certainly appreciate |
|
both of you gentlemen being here today. As I said, we have had |
|
a lot of questions and a lot of answers, and I hope we have |
|
made some headway, No. 1, in understanding and, No. 2, |
|
establishing a record, that we need to move forward. |
|
We need to have better ideas. We need to think outside the |
|
traditional square to solve this problem. If we didn't have the |
|
courageous people like General Serrano and others, General |
|
Bedoya who was here today, and others, we wouldn't even be able |
|
to get a toehold to solve the problem. |
|
We appreciate your testimony. This is not the last hearing |
|
that we will have on this issue. We will continue to work at |
|
it. |
|
This hearing of the Subcommittee on National Security, |
|
International Affairs, and Criminal Justice is adjourned. Thank |
|
you. |
|
[Whereupon, at 2:02 p.m., the subcommittee was adjourned.] |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
</pre></body></html> |
|
|