|
<html> |
|
<title> - MORE THAN A SHOT IN THE ARM: THE NEED FOR ADDITIONAL COVID-19 STIMULUS</title> |
|
<body><pre> |
|
[House Hearing, 117 Congress] |
|
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
MORE THAN A SHOT IN THE ARM: THE NEED |
|
FOR ADDITIONAL COVID-19 STIMULUS |
|
|
|
======================================================================= |
|
|
|
VIRTUAL HEARING |
|
|
|
BEFORE THE |
|
|
|
COMMITTEE ON FINANCIAL SERVICES |
|
|
|
U.S. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES |
|
|
|
ONE HUNDRED SEVENTEENTH CONGRESS |
|
|
|
FIRST SESSION |
|
|
|
__________ |
|
|
|
FEBRUARY 4, 2021 |
|
|
|
__________ |
|
|
|
Printed for the use of the Committee on Financial Services |
|
|
|
Serial No. 117-1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
[GRAPHIC(S) NOT AVAILABLE IN TIFF FORMAT] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
_________ |
|
|
|
U.S. GOVERNMENT PUBLISHING OFFICE |
|
|
|
43-964 PDF WASHINGTON : 2021 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
HOUSE COMMITTEE ON FINANCIAL SERVICES |
|
|
|
MAXINE WATERS, California, Chairwoman |
|
|
|
CAROLYN B. MALONEY, New York PATRICK McHENRY, North Carolina, |
|
NYDIA M. VELAZQUEZ, New York Ranking Member |
|
BRAD SHERMAN, California ANN WAGNER, Missouri |
|
GREGORY W. MEEKS, New York FRANK D. LUCAS, Oklahoma |
|
DAVID SCOTT, Georgia BILL POSEY, Florida |
|
AL GREEN, Texas BLAINE LUETKEMEYER, Missouri |
|
EMANUEL CLEAVER, Missouri BILL HUIZENGA, Michigan |
|
ED PERLMUTTER, Colorado STEVE STIVERS, Ohio |
|
JIM A. HIMES, Connecticut ANDY BARR, Kentucky |
|
BILL FOSTER, Illinois ROGER WILLIAMS, Texas |
|
JOYCE BEATTY, Ohio FRENCH HILL, Arkansas |
|
JUAN VARGAS, California TOM EMMER, Minnesota |
|
JOSH GOTTHEIMER, New Jersey LEE M. ZELDIN, New York |
|
VICENTE GONZALEZ, Texas BARRY LOUDERMILK, Georgia |
|
AL LAWSON, Florida ALEXANDER X. MOONEY, West Virginia |
|
MICHAEL SAN NICOLAS, Guam WARREN DAVIDSON, Ohio |
|
CINDY AXNE, Iowa TED BUDD, North Carolina |
|
SEAN CASTEN, Illinois DAVID KUSTOFF, Tennessee |
|
AYANNA PRESSLEY, Massachusetts TREY HOLLINGSWORTH, Indiana |
|
RITCHIE TORRES, New York ANTHONY GONZALEZ, Ohio |
|
STEPHEN F. LYNCH, Massachusetts JOHN ROSE, Tennessee |
|
ALMA ADAMS, North Carolina BRYAN STEIL, Wisconsin |
|
RASHIDA TLAIB, Michigan LANCE GOODEN, Texas |
|
MADELEINE DEAN, Pennsylvania WILLIAM TIMMONS, South Carolina |
|
ALEXANDRIA OCASIO-CORTEZ, New York VAN TAYLOR, Texas |
|
JESUS ``CHUY'' GARCIA, Illinois |
|
SYLVIA GARCIA, Texas |
|
NIKEMA WILLIAMS, Georgia |
|
JAKE AUCHINCLOSS, Massachusetts |
|
|
|
Charla Ouertatani, Staff Director |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
C O N T E N T S |
|
|
|
---------- |
|
Page |
|
Hearing held on: |
|
February 4, 2021............................................. 1 |
|
Appendix: |
|
February 4, 2021............................................. 69 |
|
|
|
WITNESSES |
|
Thursday, February 4, 2021 |
|
|
|
Anthony, Clarence E., CEO and Executive Director, National League |
|
of Cities...................................................... 4 |
|
Johnson, Derrick, President and CEO, National Association for the |
|
Advancement of Colored People (NAACP).......................... 7 |
|
Murguia, Janet, President and CEO, UnidosUS...................... 6 |
|
Spriggs, William E., Chief Economist, the American Federation of |
|
Labor and Congress of Industrial Organizations (AFL-CIO)....... 9 |
|
Strain, Michael R., Economist, American Enterprise Institute..... 10 |
|
|
|
APPENDIX |
|
|
|
Prepared statements: |
|
Anthony, Clarence E.......................................... 70 |
|
Johnson, Derrick............................................. 74 |
|
Murguia, Janet............................................... 77 |
|
Spriggs, William E........................................... 88 |
|
Strain, Michael R............................................ 111 |
|
|
|
Additional Material Submitted for the Record |
|
|
|
Waters, Hon. Maxine: |
|
Written statement of the Credit Union National Association |
|
(CUNA)..................................................... 131 |
|
Hill, Hon. French: |
|
Letter from various undersigned organizations................ 134 |
|
|
|
|
|
MORE THAN A SHOT IN THE ARM: |
|
THE NEED FOR ADDITIONAL |
|
COVID-19 STIMULUS |
|
|
|
---------- |
|
|
|
|
|
Thursday, February 4, 2021 |
|
|
|
U.S. House of Representatives, |
|
Committee on Financial Services, |
|
Washington, D.C. |
|
The committee met, pursuant to notice, at 10:10 a.m., via |
|
Webex, Hon. Maxine Waters [chairwoman of the committee] |
|
presiding. |
|
Members present: Representatives Waters, Sherman, Meeks, |
|
Scott, Green, Cleaver, Perlmutter, Himes, Foster, Beatty, |
|
Vargas, Gottheimer, Gonzalez of Texas, Lawson, San Nicolas, |
|
Axne, Casten, Pressley, Torres, Lynch, Adams, Tlaib, Ocasio- |
|
Cortez, Garcia of Illinois, Garcia of Texas, Williams of |
|
Georgia, Auchincloss; Wagner, Lucas, Posey, Luetkemeyer, |
|
Huizenga, Stivers, Barr, Williams of Texas, Hill, Emmer, |
|
Zeldin, Loudermilk, Mooney, Davidson, Budd, Kustoff, |
|
Hollingsworth, Gonzalez of Ohio, Rose, Steil, Gooden, Timmons, |
|
and Taylor. |
|
Chairwoman Waters. The Financial Services Committee will |
|
come to order. |
|
Without objection, the Chair is authorized to declare a |
|
recess of the committee at any time. |
|
I want to remind Members of a few matters, including some |
|
required by the regulations which established the framework for |
|
remote committee proceedings. First, I would ask all Members to |
|
keep themselves muted when they are not being recognized by the |
|
Chair. This will minimize disturbances while Members are asking |
|
questions of our witnesses. The staff has been instructed not |
|
to mute Members, except when a Member is not being recognized |
|
by the Chair and there is inadvertent background noise. |
|
Members are also reminded that they may only participate in |
|
one remote proceeding at a time. If you are participating |
|
today, please keep your camera on, and if you choose to attend |
|
a different remote proceeding, please turn your camera off. |
|
If, during the hearing, Members wish to be recognized, the |
|
Chair recommends that Members identify themselves by name so as |
|
to facilitate the Chair's recognition. I would also ask that |
|
Members be patient as the Chair proceeds, given the nature of |
|
the online platform the committee is using. |
|
With that, I yield myself 5 minutes for an opening |
|
statement. |
|
Today, this committee convenes for our very first committee |
|
hearing of the 117th Congress. Today's hearing is entitled, |
|
``More Than a Shot in the Arm: The Need for Additional COVID-19 |
|
Stimulus.'' Our focus today is on the urgent need for Congress |
|
to provide additional stimulus to address the COVID-19 pandemic |
|
crisis. |
|
Following his decisive victory in the November election, |
|
President Biden has a mandate to move on his agenda and lead |
|
the nation out of this crisis. Finally, we have real leadership |
|
in the White House to provide a serious, comprehensive response |
|
to this virus. |
|
From his first day in office, President Biden has been |
|
moving efficiently and effectively to right the ship and clean |
|
up the mess that his predecessor created. The stimulus package |
|
that Congress passed at the end of last year was the very first |
|
step, and served as an emergency stop gap to help individuals |
|
and families in distress, but it was clear then, and remains |
|
clear now, that much, much more relief is needed. President |
|
Biden has put forth a sensible and well-designed proposal, |
|
called the American Rescue Plan, to provide $1.9 trillion in |
|
essential funding and relief to individuals, families, and |
|
communities across the country. |
|
The American Rescue Plan provides additional direct |
|
stimulus payments, rental assistance, unemployment assistance, |
|
and emergency assistance for local, State and Territory |
|
Governments, as well as other critical relief and measures to |
|
respond to the crisis. Leading economists agree that it is |
|
critical for Congress to pass another large stimulus package. |
|
Federal Reserve Chairman Powell has also noted that, ``Support |
|
from fiscal policy will help households and businesses weather |
|
the downturn as well as limit lasting damage to the economy |
|
that could otherwise impede recovery.'' |
|
According to the International Monetary Fund (IMF), the |
|
Biden stimulus plan would boost United States output by 5 |
|
percent over 3 years. Last year, the United States economy |
|
shrank by the largest amount since 1946. Around 1.2 million |
|
small businesses closed between February and June of last year, |
|
and communities of color continue to be the very hardest hit. |
|
According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, of all job losses |
|
in December where jobs were held by women, women of color |
|
suffered the most job losses. These are not statistics that |
|
warrant a wait-and-see approach. These realities demand urgent |
|
action. They demand the American Rescue Plan. |
|
This committee has played and will continue to play an |
|
essential role in providing much of this relief. The |
|
Administration needs critical funding to prioritize the |
|
development and production of desperately-needed medical |
|
supplies under the Defense Production Act (DPA). Renters need |
|
additional assistance, including emergency housing vouchers, to |
|
ensure that people in rural and suburban and urban communities |
|
can remain stably housed. More funding is needed for persons |
|
experiencing homelessness, who face even greater health risk as |
|
a result of the pandemic. We must also address the reality that |
|
homeowners across America face a foreclosure crisis if Congress |
|
does not step in to support modifications before the pandemic |
|
ends. |
|
And this committee will also need to come to the aid of |
|
businesses and their workers who are barely staying afloat, |
|
including small businesses, minority-owned businesses, and |
|
sectors hit hard, like the airlines. Finally, with new, more |
|
contagious, and potentially more deadly variants of the virus |
|
from the U.K., Brazil, and South Africa, all having now been |
|
detected right here in the United States, we need to mobilize |
|
the multilateral system and its institutions. And it is very, |
|
very clear that this pandemic cannot be defeated until it is |
|
defeated everywhere. And so, I look forward to hearing from our |
|
distinguished panel of witnesses on the need for relief, and |
|
the proposal that the Biden Administration has put forward. |
|
I will now recognize Congressman Hill, who will be standing |
|
in for our ranking member, Mr. McHenry, for an opening |
|
statement. Mr. McHenry has an emergency and cannot be with us |
|
right now. Mr. Hill, you are recognized for 5 minutes. |
|
Mr. Hill. Thank you, Madam Chairwoman. Thank you for |
|
convening this hearing today. |
|
Let's start with the facts. To date, Congress has provided |
|
$3.5 trillion to support the economy. This included direct |
|
payments to individuals, assistance for small businesses, |
|
rental assistance, and support for frontline workers, among |
|
many other strategies. This was a tremendous and often |
|
bipartisan effort that has provided a bridge for Americans |
|
reeling from this dual health and economic crisis. Now, thanks |
|
in large part to Operation Warp Speed and Congress' actions, |
|
vaccines are being distributed. To be clear, we are not out of |
|
the woods yet, but we are on the right path. |
|
Today, we are discussing what our economy needs to fully |
|
recover. I think the answer is clear: The best way to support |
|
the economy now is to reopen it safely. No amount of stimulus |
|
can replace open businesses, available jobs, and kids in the |
|
classroom. We should continue to be thoughtful and deliberate. |
|
I think we can all agree that the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, |
|
and Economic Security (CARES) Act was the right response at the |
|
right time. We were all facing an enemy that we knew nothing |
|
about. Since then, Congress has come together on five separate |
|
occasions to support families, individuals, workers, and small |
|
businesses. In fact, at the end of December, just over a month |
|
ago, we came together and put nearly $1 trillion in additional |
|
relief through the Congress, which was signed into law. This |
|
$900 billion package, money to be spent across our country, has |
|
yet to be spent. Just 1 month later, that money has not yet |
|
seen its full impact in our economy and for our families. |
|
Today, unlike 10 months ago, we have the benefit of real data, |
|
and the facts guide us in driving better policy outcomes. |
|
Last Tuesday, the Bureau of Labor Statistics reported that |
|
despite the surge in positivity rates throughout the summer and |
|
fall, States that were open, and open safely, had better |
|
employment rebounds than those States that were locked down. In |
|
fact, employment increased in 15 open States. California, in |
|
comparison, lost more than 52,000 jobs. Michigan lost more than |
|
64,000 jobs. In my own home State of Arkansas, our unemployment |
|
rate fell to 4.2 percent in December, from the peak in May of |
|
10.8 percent. Our tax revenues are up. |
|
What does the data tell us? It tells us that States can |
|
reopen safely. It tells us that if States aren't open, |
|
businesses cannot operate. If there are no businesses, there |
|
will be no jobs for individuals to come back to. Our focus |
|
should be on how best to safely reopen our economy. That means |
|
more testing and faster vaccine distribution to keep our |
|
communities healthy. It may mean more funding to ensure that |
|
frontline workers have the supplies they need to stay safe. At |
|
the same time, we need to make sure that additional funding |
|
will have an impact on Americans who need it the most. There |
|
are families and individuals who are hurting from the |
|
lockdowns. We should be targeting assistance to get them back |
|
into the workforce, not just creating more bureaucracy and |
|
throwing money at this critical problem. |
|
We should mirror the bipartisan compromise and serious |
|
legislating that went into the CARES Act and the other four |
|
bills that were enacted last year, and not spend time |
|
deliberating a partisan, wasteful, not targeted, $1.9 trillion |
|
stimulus bill. The data is pointing us towards what the economy |
|
needs. Now, let politics get out of the way and let us get to |
|
the work of providing the targeted help we need. |
|
Again, let me thank the Chair for holding this hearing. I |
|
yield back the balance of my time. |
|
Chairwoman Waters. Thank you very much. And Members, I am |
|
so pleased that we have a President with a plan. |
|
I want to welcome today's distinguished witnesses to the |
|
committee: Clarence Anthony, CEO and executive director of the |
|
National League of Cities; Derrick Johnson, president and CEO |
|
of the National Association for the Advancement of Colored |
|
People (NAACP); Janet Murguia, president and CEO of UnidosUS; |
|
Dr. William Spriggs, the chief economist at the American |
|
Federation of Labor and Congress of Industrial Organizations |
|
(AFL-CIO); and Dr. Michael Strain, an economist at the American |
|
Enterprise Institute. |
|
Each of you will have 5 minutes to summarize your |
|
testimony. You should be able to see a timer on your screen |
|
that will indicate how much time you have left, and a timer |
|
will go off at the end of your time. I would ask you to be |
|
mindful of the timer and quickly wrap up your testimony if you |
|
hear the timer, so that we can be respectful of both the |
|
witnesses' and the committee members' time. And without |
|
objection, your written statements will be made a part of the |
|
record. |
|
With that, Mr. Anthony, you are now recognized for 5 |
|
minutes to present your oral testimony. |
|
|
|
STATEMENT OF CLARENCE E. ANTHONY, CEO AND EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, |
|
NATIONAL LEAGUE OF CITIES (NLC) |
|
|
|
Mr. Anthony. Good morning. Thank you, Chairwoman Waters, |
|
Congressman Hill, and members of the committee. I am Clarence |
|
Anthony. I am CEO and executive director of the National League |
|
of Cities, and a former mayor of South Bay, Florida, for over |
|
24 years. The National League of Cities is the nation's |
|
foremost resource and nonpartisan advocate for municipal |
|
governments and their leaders, representing 19,000 cities, |
|
towns, and villages, many in your districts. Today, I am |
|
speaking on behalf of all of those local governments that have |
|
gone above and beyond to overcome the COVID-19 emergency. |
|
Local government employees are truly on the front lines of |
|
enforcing measures that protect residents from catching and |
|
spreading COVID-19. Local community and economic development |
|
departments are stabilizing households and small businesses |
|
harmed by losses from the COVID-19 pandemic. Local elected |
|
officials are making painful budget cuts to preserve essential |
|
day-to-day operations that sustain cities as economic engines |
|
and places of opportunity. Residents are relying more than ever |
|
on the safety net programs that local governments are |
|
responsible for putting into action. |
|
We are grateful for the funding provided in prior emergency |
|
relief packages, but the fact remains that local budget |
|
revenues are far below normal collections. Municipal |
|
governments are alone facing a $90 billion shortfall on 1-year |
|
revenues. This does not include the losses facing County, |
|
State, Tribal, or Territory Governments. NLC supports the $350 |
|
billion for emergency intergovernmental relief. |
|
Local leaders in your district will tell you this is not a |
|
bailout. Our local communities need a partnership, and we are |
|
fighting every day. Labor market data shows that local |
|
governments are still cutting jobs to offset revenue losses and |
|
unexpected expenses related to COVID-19. The December job |
|
reports from the Bureau of Labor Statistics state that 32,000 |
|
jobs have been cut. Public sector employment is down by more |
|
than 1 million jobs, compared to February 2020. |
|
Emergency funding has provided aid to the private sector, |
|
to residents harmed by COVID. SBA Treasury programs provided |
|
businesses with access to credit. HUD programs provided funding |
|
to help homeless residents, renters, and small businesses. The |
|
role of local government in these programs is to connect |
|
emergency resources to those in need, and that required drawing |
|
up new programs lifting up our residents through creating |
|
operations that help small and minority-owned businesses |
|
overcome obstacles. |
|
There is no question that additional housing stability is |
|
important, and the National League of Cities (NLC) has |
|
reflected that in our Homeward Bound programs that focus on job |
|
security and health. As a result, however, of these layoffs and |
|
operation decline, many local governments are less able to |
|
enact this kind of guidance that they are immediately |
|
responsible for after the CARES Act was passed. The new |
|
Emergency Rental Assistance Program is a reasonable response to |
|
the emerging economy-killing eviction cliff. |
|
Roughly 1 out of every 5 people is in a rental in America. |
|
Forty million people are at risk. Local governments are the |
|
ones that implement these initiatives. We need support. Local |
|
governments are running out of ways to paper over dramatic |
|
losses, and even when that happens, declines will not stop the |
|
new programs from needing to be implemented. |
|
So, we are asking that these principles ensure that local |
|
governments are connected and engaged in the next bill: one, |
|
emergency funding should be fair and appropriate for each and |
|
every local government, with no minimum population threshold |
|
for eligibility; two, allocations of aid should be built on |
|
familiar and proven government revenue-sharing programs like |
|
the Community Development Block Grants; three, funding should |
|
be separate for States, counties, and municipalities; and four, |
|
eligible expenditures should be targeted to the widespread |
|
health and economic consequences of COVID-19, including |
|
unavoidable revenue shortfall. |
|
In conclusion, on Monday CBO warned that unemployment is |
|
likely, so we are asking for our shot as local governments. |
|
Thank you, Madam Chairwoman. |
|
[The prepared statement of Mr. Anthony can be found on page |
|
70 of the appendix.] |
|
Chairwoman Waters. Thank you very much, Mr. Anthony. Ms. |
|
Murguia, you are now recognized for 5 minutes to present your |
|
oral testimony. |
|
|
|
STATEMENT OF JANET MURGUIA, PRESIDENT AND CEO, UNIDOSUS |
|
|
|
Ms. Murguia. Good morning. Thank you, Chairwoman Waters and |
|
Ranking Member McHenry, for inviting me to testify today. My |
|
name is Janet Murguia, and I am the president and CEO of |
|
UnidosUS, the largest Hispanic civil rights and advocacy |
|
organization in the United States. For more than 50 years, and |
|
in partnership with our affiliate networks, we have worked to |
|
advance opportunities for Latino families across the country so |
|
they can achieve economic security and build wealth. Chairwoman |
|
Waters, thank you especially for leading this committee's work |
|
to address income inequality and racial wealth disparities. |
|
As I begin, I would note that inadequate recovery efforts |
|
from the last recession, when Latinos lost 66 percent of their |
|
wealth, contributed to the fragile economic status of the |
|
Latino community prior to the COVID-19 outbreak. As a result, a |
|
pre-pandemic 2020 poll found that most Latinos were already |
|
concerned about high housing costs, and said they struggled to |
|
make ends meet. |
|
And social, economic, and health disparities, coupled with |
|
systemic barriers to safety net assistance and relief, have |
|
disproportionately impacted Latinos and devastated our |
|
families. More than 70 percent of Hispanic workers are |
|
essential workers, which is why we are twice as likely to get |
|
sick and 3 times as likely to die from COVID-19. |
|
Latinos were also deeply impacted by job losses in hard-hit |
|
industries like hospitality, including those that did not allow |
|
telework, and Latino small businesses have struggled to stay |
|
open. Our polling shows that more than half of Latinos surveyed |
|
have lost job wages or businesses due to the pandemic, and |
|
these job and earnings losses put Latinos especially at risk of |
|
losing their homes to eviction and foreclosure. |
|
While the pandemic has placed financial pressure and strain |
|
on many Americans, the experience of Latinos in accessing |
|
Federal relief has been especially difficult, since many |
|
Hispanic immigrants in mixed-status families have been excluded |
|
from emergency Federal relief and aid. For example, the CARES |
|
Act excluded millions of mixed-status families, including more |
|
than 5 million children and spouses who are either U.S. |
|
citizens or green card holders, from stimulus payments. While a |
|
partial fix was enacted in December, millions of U.S. children |
|
and their families remain blocked from Federal relief. |
|
The President's American Rescue Plan is a huge improvement. |
|
Latino workers and their families will benefit from extended |
|
unemployment insurance, and housing protections and aid to |
|
prevent eviction. The plan's aid to State and local governments |
|
will help our local affiliated, community-based organizations |
|
and help them serve their hard-hit communities. But it is |
|
outrageous and immoral to continue denying aid to families and |
|
children in need during a national emergency simply because of |
|
their parents' immigration status, especially when they are |
|
experiencing hunger and food insecurity. So, Congress must |
|
include all of our neighbors and essential workers in emergency |
|
pandemic relief. |
|
We then would suggest some additions to the Biden plan, |
|
such as: ensure that HUD and Treasury assistance reaches the |
|
hardest-hit communities, including mixed-status families and |
|
immigrant workers; provide $700 million in support for housing |
|
counseling organizations to help homeowners and renters at risk |
|
of losing their homes; expand foreclosure protection, extending |
|
aid to all homeowners, and establish a homeowner assistance |
|
fund; set aside a portion of small business aid for impacted |
|
minority-owned business; and use the Community Reinvestment Act |
|
(CRA) to ensure that the hardest-hit communities can access |
|
available aid. |
|
A true American rescue plan is one that ends the cruel |
|
exclusion of families and includes everyone in relief. But to |
|
truly rebuild our economy better, we must also protect |
|
essential workers by finally updating our immigration system |
|
and providing a path to citizenship for immigrant workers and |
|
their families. We must do this now to stand up for the people |
|
who have been standing up for us, including through budget |
|
reconciliation if necessary. A real robust and lasting economic |
|
recovery depends on it. Thank you. |
|
[The prepared statement of Ms. Murguia can be found on page |
|
77 of the appendix.] |
|
Chairwoman Waters. Thank you very much. Mr. Johnson, you |
|
are now recognized for 5 minutes to present your oral |
|
testimony. |
|
|
|
STATEMENT OF DERRICK JOHNSON, PRESIDENT AND CEO, NATIONAL |
|
ASSOCIATION FOR THE ADVANCEMENT OF COLORED PEOPLE (NAACP) |
|
|
|
Mr. Johnson. Good morning, and thank you, Chairwoman |
|
Waters, for your leadership, and Ranking Member McHenry. Thank |
|
you for the invitation to testify on this timely, important |
|
topic: the need for additional support for COVID-19 relief. I |
|
am excited about your leadership, Chairwoman Waters, at this |
|
crucial time as we look forward to working with you in ensuring |
|
that our communities are protected from this unfortunate health |
|
crisis. On behalf of the million activists who make up the |
|
NAACP from across the country in 47 States and 2,200 units, |
|
NAACP is the nation's oldest civil rights organization, this |
|
month at 112-years-old. |
|
Much of what I want to talk about will highlight the need |
|
as we have observed it on the ground across the country. Before |
|
I do that, I do want to recognize: Representative Ayanna |
|
Pressley for helping us in December to highlight the need for |
|
student loan indebtedness; the new Chair of the Congressional |
|
Black Caucus and member of this committee, Representative |
|
Beatty, for using her platform to continue to amplify the call |
|
for justice, equity, and equality; and former CBC Chairman |
|
Cleaver, who has been sounding the alarm on testing and racial |
|
disparities in this moment. |
|
As we look at this current crisis in the stimulus packages, |
|
we really want to focus on critical workers, and many of those |
|
critical workers are straddled with student indebtedness. In |
|
fact, if you look at the student loan crisis, African Americans |
|
and Latinos are disproportionately impacted because many of |
|
them are first-generation college students, but in total we are |
|
looking at about $1.7 trillion in student loan indebtedness. |
|
If we consider discharging much of this, if not all, it can |
|
be seen as an economic stimulus. Much of the funds that are |
|
used to pay back these loans could infuse capital back into our |
|
economic system and caboose our GDP. In fact, there are tools |
|
that are currently in place to provide support for critical |
|
workers under the Public Service Loan Forgiveness Program, |
|
where many of our citizens participate in ensuring that our |
|
society keeps moving. These are government workers, our |
|
teachers, and others who have to go to work every day to ensure |
|
that we are provided the necessary resources for which our tax |
|
dollars pay. |
|
Far too many of them are underemployed and over-indebted |
|
because of the student loan burden. The tools in the toolbox |
|
through the automatic discharge after 10 years could be |
|
accelerated and it could be immediate. We celebrate the |
|
forbearance that the new Administration just called for, but if |
|
we really look closely at how to stimulate our economy, this is |
|
an effective tool. We have given more away in tax breaks and |
|
other stimulus to corporations. In fact, if you look at the |
|
ongoing tax break that was provided over the last 4 years on |
|
top of the stimulus packages for corporations, it more than |
|
doubled the amount of student loan indebtedness. |
|
It is the right thing to do in this moment of crisis. It is |
|
a way to boost our economy, and it is a way to ensure that |
|
those individuals who are on the front line providing support |
|
for us, and municipal governments and State governments, and |
|
our teachers in the classrooms will be cared for in ways in |
|
which it could pay dividends for our economy. |
|
In Houston, as we begin to look at the eviction crisis, |
|
many people have to be on the front lines to prevent evictions |
|
as a result of some of the deadlines about to expire. We |
|
partner with BeyGOOD, Beyonce's group and we created a program, |
|
and we were overwhelmed with the need of individuals who are on |
|
the verge of being evicted. In fact, it was so overwhelming |
|
that we had to shut down the program within 48 hours, because |
|
37,000 families, over 50,000 applications, came in so quickly |
|
that we had to shut the program down. |
|
It is clear that there is a crisis. This committee can |
|
continue to hold businesses and banks accountable to ensure |
|
that in this moment of economic transition, evictions are |
|
stalled and we are able to put our economy right, and people |
|
can fully participate. And when you look at the vaccine and the |
|
disparity in which the vaccines are being deployed, we have to |
|
make sure those who are most impacted are provided with the |
|
necessary support. |
|
This COVID moment has impacted African Americans to where 1 |
|
out of 660 Black persons in this country are dying because of |
|
COVID, and the vaccine deployment has not been equitable. In |
|
the City of New York, we found that high-wealth individuals |
|
were going to Latino communities to get the vaccines, although |
|
the vaccines were placed there for the Latino community to |
|
receive. We have to have a better approach of deploying the |
|
vaccine. So, when we look-- |
|
Chairwoman Waters. Thank you, Mr. Johnson. Your time has |
|
expired. |
|
Mr. Johnson. Thank you. |
|
[The prepared statement of Mr. Johnson can be found on page |
|
74 of the appendix.] |
|
Chairwoman Waters. And let me just take a moment to thank |
|
Mr. Anthony and Ms. Murguia for their very fine testimony. Dr. |
|
Spriggs, you are now recognized for 5 minutes to present your |
|
oral testimony. |
|
|
|
STATEMENT OF WILLIAM E. SPRIGGS, CHIEF ECONOMIST, THE AMERICAN |
|
FEDERATION OF LABOR AND CONGRESS OF INDUSTRIAL ORGANIZATIONS |
|
(AFL-CIO) |
|
|
|
Mr. Spriggs. Thank you. Thank you, Chairwoman Waters. I |
|
appreciate your leadership and this opportunity to speak to |
|
your committee on the issues of our nation's crisis. I am happy |
|
to offer this testimony on behalf of the AFL-CIO, America's |
|
house of labor, representing the working people of the United |
|
States, and based on my expertise as a professor in Howard |
|
University's Department of Economics. |
|
My testimony today will discuss the immediate challenge our |
|
nation faces of a severely damaged labor market and the need to |
|
conduct an all-out, coordinated Federal, State, and local |
|
Government fight to tame the COVID virus. We will need to have |
|
in place a full fiscal response to coordinate with current |
|
monetary policy to ensure our economy can emerge with a robust |
|
and sustainable growth path by addressing inequality. That |
|
means we need policies to address the damage of the virus to |
|
economic activity, ensuring all of our efforts to reduce the |
|
incidence of the virus, and to regain American leadership |
|
globally to heal the global economy as the United States did at |
|
the end of World War II. |
|
Despite improvements since April 2020, when our nation lost |
|
the greatest number of payroll positions since World War II, |
|
through December, we were still down 9.8 million payroll |
|
positions since February 2014. In March, Congress acted rapidly |
|
to pass several key economic supports, but the efficacy of |
|
those policies began to show weakening and waning job gains |
|
since July, after key provisions, like the $600 in additional |
|
weekly unemployment compensation, phased out, so in December, |
|
we were again losing jobs. Today, our labor market is missing |
|
almost 1.8 million more jobs from its peak than we stood at the |
|
depth of the Great Recession in September 2010, compared to |
|
that labor market's peak in January of 2008. |
|
Despite congressional efforts to put substantial sums into |
|
the economy in the second quarter of last year to make up for |
|
lost jobs, slower business, and to help develop a vaccine, in |
|
the 4th quarter of last year, the economy grew at a |
|
significantly slower rate than the 3rd quarter, and we began |
|
this year with an economy that is smaller than it was in the |
|
2nd quarter of 2018. This is a dire situation. Our situation is |
|
complicated because our job losses stem from a failure to |
|
control the spread of the virus. |
|
Individuals living in high-income areas have drastically |
|
reduced their consumption of services, especially personal |
|
services--restaurants, brick and mortar retail consumption, and |
|
travel--in response to the prevalence of the virus, not in |
|
response to health orders to limit business activity, and this |
|
is a vital portion of consumption that is shrinking our |
|
economy. |
|
To tackle the source of our economy's woes, we need a |
|
coordinated effort by the Federal Government with State and |
|
local government partners, but State and local employment |
|
levels are depleted. Through December, we had 373,000 fewer |
|
State Government workers and a little more than 1 million fewer |
|
local government workers. We cannot bring all of the public |
|
resources to bear on this crucial fight with so many fewer |
|
public sector workers. To get ahead of this rapid virus, we |
|
need congressional action now, because we failed in December to |
|
have the money for State and local workforces. |
|
It is important to also look at the important things that |
|
were missing. We need the $400 in unemployment compensation |
|
added back that was key to what was happening in the 3rd |
|
quarter recovery. We need the pandemic relief payments of |
|
$1,400 because that was key for what was making the economy |
|
expand in the 3rd quarter. And we need to increase the Federal |
|
minimum wage to ensure that we will have wage growth coming out |
|
of this recovery and to ensure racial equity as wages recover. |
|
We know that there will be excess monopsony power that will get |
|
in the way of restoring the wage growth that we need for our |
|
economy to recover. |
|
We need to have the United States back special drawing |
|
rights at the International Monetary Fund (IMF) so that all |
|
world governments will be our partner in defeating this virus. |
|
No one will be safe until all countries can win this war. |
|
[The prepared statement of Dr. Spriggs can be found on page |
|
88 of the appendix.] |
|
Chairwoman Waters. Thank you, Dr. Spriggs. Dr. Strain, you |
|
are now recognized for 5 minutes to present your oral |
|
testimony. |
|
|
|
STATEMENT OF MICHAEL R. STRAIN, ECONOMIST, AMERICAN ENTERPRISE |
|
INSTITUTE |
|
|
|
Mr. Strain. Thank you, Chairwoman Waters and Ranking Member |
|
McHenry for the invitation to testify today. And thank you, |
|
Congressman Hill and members of the committee. It is an honor |
|
to be here. |
|
Two ways to assess the need for economic support are top |
|
down and bottom up. The top-down approach attempts to assess |
|
the amount by which the economy is underperforming and |
|
determine how much government spending would be required to |
|
bring the level of economic activity back to where it should |
|
be. More precisely, the quantity of goods and services that |
|
could be sustainably produced given the economy's underlying |
|
technology and labor and capital resources is determined and |
|
compared to the economy's actual production. The difference |
|
between the economy's underlying potential and actual |
|
performance is called the output gap. The size of the output |
|
gap can be used to determine the appropriate size of an |
|
economic stimulus package. |
|
Alternatively, Congress can take a bottom-up approach. This |
|
way of crafting economic support would pay less attention to |
|
the size of the output gap and more to the specific needs |
|
facing the economy. Today, those needs clearly involve |
|
increasing the nation's capacity to distribute the vaccine and |
|
to test people for COVID-19. Of course, in practice, applying |
|
both a top-down and bottom-up approach makes the most sense, |
|
but judged by either criteria, President Biden's proposed $1.9 |
|
trillion American Rescue Plan is too large and too wide in |
|
scope. |
|
According to my calculations based on Congressional Budget |
|
Office (CBO) data, the 2021 output gap will be around $420 |
|
billion. This calculation includes the effects of the $900 |
|
billion law Congress passed just 6 weeks ago. The policy debate |
|
seems to have all but forgotten that Congress appropriated |
|
around $900 billion just a month and a half ago, but factoring |
|
that in, the output gap will be around $420 billion for the |
|
current year. From a macroeconomic top-down perspective, the |
|
President's proposal would fill the 2021 output gap several |
|
times. |
|
It is commonly argued that the risk from spending too |
|
little is larger than the risk for spending too much. I agree, |
|
but this is not the same as arguing that the size of an |
|
additional stimulus package should be untethered to estimates |
|
of the underlying economic need. Any assessment of the right |
|
size for another stimulus should start with a good estimate of |
|
the output gap, and given the [inaudible] calculating that gap |
|
and the balance of risks, it is prudent to err on the side of a |
|
slightly larger package. |
|
The future paths of gross domestic product to the output |
|
gap and consumer prices are very uncertain. Congress should |
|
recognize the many risks from spending too much and |
|
[inaudible]. From this macroeconomic perspective, the |
|
President's $1.9 trillion proposal is clearly too large. While |
|
the proposal contains several important components that |
|
Congress should enact, from a bottom-up microeconomic |
|
perspective, many major components of the plan are either |
|
unnecessary or will hold the recovery back. |
|
For example, direct checks to households earning a six- |
|
figure incomes that have not experienced employment loss are an |
|
unnecessary and imprudent use of government spending. The |
|
proposed $400 Federal supplement through September to standard |
|
State-provided unemployment insurance benefits would prolong |
|
the period of labor market weakness by incentivizing unemployed |
|
workers to remain unemployed. Raising the Federal minimum wage |
|
to $15 an hour [inaudible] workers in many States. As a moral |
|
proposition, a bill that would destroy jobs for low-wage |
|
workers while handing out checks to employed upper-middle-class |
|
households is deeply problematic. |
|
A bill that was more focused and that did not contain these |
|
harmful or unnecessary provisions would also be more aligned |
|
with the overall macroeconomic need and would better address |
|
our specific economic challenges. A bill that provided adequate |
|
funding for vaccine distribution to strengthen the social |
|
safety net and provide needed relief to State and local |
|
governments would be reasonable and advisable. It would cost |
|
under $750 billion, would be focused on current economic and |
|
social need, [inaudible] gap. Thank you. |
|
[The prepared statement of Dr. Strain can be found on page |
|
111 of the appendix.] |
|
Chairwoman Waters. Thank you, Dr. Strain. I now recognize |
|
myself for 5 minutes for questions. |
|
This is the first week of Black History Month. While there |
|
is so much to celebrate and honor, we know that this pandemic |
|
has taken a particular toll on both renters and homeowners of |
|
color. According to the latest Census data, renters and |
|
homeowners of color are significantly more likely to be behind |
|
in paying their rent or mortgage, putting them at greater risk |
|
of eviction and foreclosure. Before the start of the CDC's |
|
eviction order, researchers estimated that up to 40 million |
|
renters could face eviction. More recently, Moody's Analytics |
|
estimated that renters owe more than $57 billion in back rent, |
|
utilities, and additional fees. In the second quarter of 2020, |
|
mortgage arrears totaled an estimated $16.3 million. |
|
Since the pandemic began, it has been my top priority to |
|
ensure that families remain in their homes, and last year, I |
|
successfully sought to secure $25 billion in emergency rental |
|
assistance. But as I have said, that was just the first step, |
|
and there is much more work to be done, and now is the time to |
|
do it. |
|
Mr. Spriggs, without taking further action to protect |
|
renters and homeowners, we could see a wave of foreclosures and |
|
evictions in 2021. Can you tell us, based on your research, how |
|
such a wave of evictions and foreclosures would impact the |
|
American economy, both in the short term and the long term? |
|
Mr. Spriggs. Thank you, Chairwoman Waters. Yes, this is a |
|
vital problem to address, and thank you for your leadership on |
|
this issue. It will complicate things, which is why we have the |
|
urgency of acting now. People, as you mentioned, are in |
|
arrears. The moratorium only means they will not be evicted |
|
now, and the $600 that they received at the beginning of |
|
January has already been spent because they got behind from the |
|
period of July through December, when Congress refused to |
|
respond to the Health and Economic Recovery Omnibus Emergency |
|
Solutions (HEROES) Act that the House passed, thanks to the |
|
leadership. |
|
Those dollars are gone. Those households are in desperate |
|
need of assistance and rental assistance so that when we get |
|
out of this situation, they will be able to stay in their |
|
homes. If we allow people to become homeless, we will have |
|
scarring that we cannot solve. It will be more expensive. This |
|
is not the time to be penny wise and pound foolish because |
|
people are already behind, and that is why we must do this now. |
|
We do not have months to wait. We already know their situation. |
|
We need to act now. |
|
Chairwoman Waters. Mr. Johnson and Ms. Murguia, can you |
|
tell us about the current housing instability that Black and |
|
Latinx communities are experiencing across the country, and how |
|
it compounds existing socioeconomic inequities? |
|
How can resources, like emergency rental assistance or |
|
housing vouchers, help stabilize the hardest-hit communities? |
|
Thank you. |
|
Mr. Johnson. Sure. At the NAACP, we tried to provide some |
|
support. We opened up a portal to help home renters. Within 48 |
|
hours, our system crashed because we had over 37,000 people |
|
apply, literally. That is on top of the many workers, |
|
particularly in the southern States, who are underpaid, who |
|
work in critical areas, and they are making the necessary |
|
support, in addition to the exposure that they are bringing |
|
home to their families in this COVID moment. Your actions and |
|
your efforts could help support those families to become sturdy |
|
in this moment as we rebuild our economy. |
|
Many southern States underpay their State and local |
|
workers, including teachers. A lot of these teachers are home |
|
renters. So, we are asking teachers under economic stress and |
|
duress to teach our young people for a future when they cannot |
|
be in a comfortable position in this present. Your assistance |
|
is desperately needed in this moment. |
|
Chairwoman Waters. Thank you very much. My time has |
|
expired. I now recognize Mr. Hill for 5 minutes of questions. |
|
Mr. Hill. Thank you, Madam Chairwoman, and I thank our |
|
witnesses for the really useful information. |
|
Something that is so important to Congress, particularly |
|
for Republicans, is assessing, after nearly $4 trillion in |
|
appropriated funds plus the strong support of the Federal |
|
Reserve System during 2020, how much more targeted relief and, |
|
directly, where is our challenge? So Dr. Strain, I really |
|
appreciated you sort of assessing that output gap issue, though |
|
when you look at the underlying potential and you look at the |
|
actual performance and find that gap, based on CBO's, something |
|
that the Congress studies quite closely, long-term economic |
|
analysis that was released on Monday, is there an appropriate |
|
spectrum of stimulus that Congress should consider? In other |
|
words, is President Biden's proposal of $1.9 trillion right, or |
|
should it be something smaller? Reiterate that point. Let me |
|
give you a minute to talk about that. |
|
Mr. Strain. Thank you, Congressman. It is really an |
|
excellent question. The policy debate seems to have forgotten |
|
that Congress just appropriated $900 billion 6 weeks ago, and |
|
that money hasn't fully been spent. It is still making its way |
|
through the system, and it is going to have a big impact on the |
|
economy. That is a larger appropriation than Congress |
|
appropriated following the Great Recession that began with the |
|
2008 financial crisis. |
|
There is a risk of Congress appropriating more money than |
|
the economy needs and pushing the economy above its sustainable |
|
level of production. This risk is amplified by significant |
|
growth in the money supply. It is amplified by supply chain |
|
disruptions. It is amplified by diminishments and the |
|
productive capacity of the economy. It is amplified by the fact |
|
that households are sitting on over $1 trillion of unspent |
|
savings. And it is amplified by the possibility that when the |
|
vaccines are in wide distribution in the second half of the |
|
year, households are going to go on a spending spree. |
|
Congress is correct, I think, to be thinking about the |
|
economic need, but that needs to be scaled to reflect both the |
|
risks of doing too little and the risks of doing too much, and |
|
there are real risks of doing too much. |
|
Mr. Hill. Thank you. That is something we talked about in |
|
the Congressional Oversight Commission of the CARES Act with |
|
the Federal Reserve and the Treasury, precisely that, |
|
particularly as it relates to State and local governments, |
|
because we don't always count that a great deal of that $4 |
|
trillion in appropriated money goes to support our State and |
|
local government activities. Thank you for that. |
|
I want to switch subjects briefly. There has been reference |
|
to the minimum wage here. I wonder if you agree with former |
|
economic adviser to President Clinton and President Obama, |
|
Larry Summers, when he says that more Economic Impact Payment |
|
(EIP) is not the best use of the economic stimulus at this |
|
time. He even cites that it is not effective, and you just |
|
referenced that there is $1 trillion out there in additional |
|
unspent savings. Can you address that for me? |
|
Mr. Strain. Yes. I think that almost any use of half a |
|
trillion dollars would be better than giving checks to |
|
households who are in six-figure incomes and who haven't |
|
suffered any employment loss. More than that, I think a bill |
|
that both would increase the Federal minimum wage to $15 an |
|
hour, and that gives checks to households who earn six-figure |
|
incomes and haven't experienced unemployment loss, really has |
|
some moral problems as well. The President's plan would destroy |
|
low-wage jobs while boosting middle-class incomes. I don't |
|
think that is what Congress should be doing, particularly in a |
|
period of labor market weakness. |
|
Mr. Hill. Thank you, Dr. Strain. Let me say that all of |
|
this combined, this work, is over 20 percent of GDP, which is a |
|
tremendous amount of stimulus. Mr. Spriggs referenced the |
|
support for our poor, struggling countries in the world facing |
|
the pandemic, and referenced the use of special drawing rights |
|
from the International Monetary Fund. Madam Chairwoman, I would |
|
like to submit my op-ed in the Wall Street Journal for the |
|
record, with your permission. |
|
Chairwoman Waters. Without objection, it is so ordered. |
|
And the gentleman's time has expired. |
|
Mr. Hill. Thank you, Madam Chairwoman. |
|
Chairwoman Waters. We will move on. The gentleman from |
|
California, Mr. Sherman, who is also the Chair of our |
|
Subcommittee on Investor Protection, Entrepreneurship, and |
|
Capital Markets, is now recognized for 5 minutes. |
|
Mr. Sherman. Thank you, Madam Chairwoman. As I pointed out |
|
in the Democratic Caucus, Madam Chairwoman, you preside as Full |
|
Committee Chair over a committee today of Full Committee |
|
Chairs. I will be the only one out of the first six Democratic |
|
questioners who does not preside over, of course, our Financial |
|
Services Committee, the House Oversight and Reform Committee, |
|
the House Small Business Committee, the House Foreign Affairs |
|
Committee, or the House Agriculture Committee. |
|
Madam Chairwoman, I thank you for mentioning that we are |
|
not safe until we defeat this disease everywhere. There are |
|
those who are focusing only, and we should focus on, |
|
vaccinating all Americans, but until all 7 billion-plus people |
|
in the world are vaccinated, we haven't met our moral |
|
responsibility. The world economy is still suffering from this |
|
disease, but perhaps most importantly, there are billions and |
|
billions of people outside the U.S. who can be infected. That |
|
is where the disease will replicate. Whenever it replicates, it |
|
mutates, and some of those mutations can lead to more virulence |
|
and more contagious disease, and perhaps worst of all, a |
|
version of this disease that cannot be dealt with by the |
|
vaccines we have developed. |
|
Speaking of vaccines, we did a great job in this country of |
|
developing three vaccines, but we initially were throwing away |
|
Pfizer vaccines after five dosages came out of a bottle that |
|
held almost seven dosages. We threw it away due to the FDA. |
|
Now, we are still throwing away vaccine when we could get half |
|
a dose out of one bottle and a half out of another. We are |
|
manufacturing the vaccine as quickly as we can in the factories |
|
of the company that invented it, but no company has licensed |
|
one of its competitors to create vaccine in their own factory. |
|
And we have just begun testing lower dosages to see their |
|
effectiveness, although the bulk of available medical science |
|
shows that much lower dosages would be effective, particularly |
|
in those under age 55. We have started those studies 8 months |
|
late. |
|
I want to thank Mr. Anthony for being here and for pointing |
|
out that our municipalities are losing about $90 billion in |
|
revenue, that we have a million public sector jobs, and I know |
|
there is a study from the Economic Policy Institute that |
|
estimates that by the end of this year, we could be losing 5.3 |
|
million public sector jobs. Now, that is, of course, a problem |
|
for the person who loses their job. It is bad for the economy |
|
in that those people aren't able to spend. But I want to focus |
|
on the services we lose when we don't have those people working |
|
for us. Looking at Los Angeles as one municipality, it spends |
|
roughly one-third of the money, more than one-third on public |
|
safety, so using that as an example, we are looking at $30 |
|
billion less spent for public safety. |
|
So my question, Mr. Anthony, is, if someone in Congress |
|
votes against providing revenue to municipalities, are they, in |
|
effect, voting to defund our police, because obviously any city |
|
that spends a third of its money on public safety, and my city |
|
does and most cities do, is going to have to make cuts in all |
|
of its functions. And if those cuts are pro rata, we are |
|
looking at a $30 billion dollar defunding of our police. Is |
|
that a real, practical effect of voting against this bill? |
|
Mr. Anthony. Congressman, thank you so much for that |
|
question. Local governments have to balance their budgets, and |
|
as Congressman Cleaver, a former mayor, knows very well, we |
|
will have to look at all of our programs, including our |
|
permitting process, and our housing programs. And, in fact, we |
|
will have to look at our public safety, fire and police, if we |
|
don't get additional funding, because it is essential that we |
|
balance our budget. We are not like other levels of government, |
|
so we will have to look at that, and I believe that would |
|
probably be a difficult thing for us to do, but we would have |
|
to look at all of the programs. |
|
Mr. Sherman. I would hope that those who vote against this |
|
bill will go to the House Floor and say that they are in favor |
|
of defunding those municipal services and that they stand by |
|
the votes to defund the police. I yield back. |
|
Chairwoman Waters. Thank you very much. The gentlewoman |
|
from Missouri, Mrs. Wagner, is recognized for 5 minutes. |
|
Mrs. Wagner. Thank you, Madam Chairwoman, and I thank our |
|
witnesses for being with us today. |
|
I am going to get straight to it, and I would like folks to |
|
keep their answers as brief as possible. |
|
Dr. Strain, in early March, economic data directly pointed |
|
to the need for congressional action to support the economy, |
|
and by the end of the summer, our economy had stabilized, but |
|
small businesses and their hard-working employees needed |
|
additional support as they continued to face lockdown measures. |
|
Congress acted and provided approximately $3.5 trillion in |
|
response to the COVID-19 pandemic, and in the late fall, |
|
economic data indicated a downward trend. |
|
In December, Congress, again, acted to provide relief. |
|
Today, I am still hearing daily from my constituents who have |
|
yet to receive their stimulus checks or who have been unable to |
|
apply for the next round of Paycheck Protection Program (PPP) |
|
or Economic Injury Disaster Loan (EIDL) loans. If my |
|
constituents haven't even gotten access yet to the funds we |
|
provided in December, the nearly trillion dollars, $900 |
|
billion, how can we expect that useful economic data exists |
|
about whether or not another new round of relief funding is |
|
even required? |
|
Dr. Strain, do you agree that Congress should rely on |
|
quality economic data to identify the weak points in fiscal |
|
relief efforts? |
|
Mr. Strain. Yes, of course. I agree with that, and I think |
|
that there have been some problems in getting CARES Act funds |
|
to the households and businesses who need them. The |
|
overwhelming majority of the time, those processes work, but |
|
there are times when they haven't. And we do know that |
|
households have received checks. We know that unemployed |
|
workers have received unemployment benefits. We know that |
|
businesses have received PPP. But those processes haven't been |
|
perfect, I agree with you. |
|
Mrs. Wagner. The problem here is we are not really getting |
|
quality economic data to identify, I think, the weak points in |
|
our fiscal relief efforts. |
|
Other witnesses today have focused on the positive impacts |
|
of further economic relief, but data shows that there can be |
|
negative outcomes, as well, from excessive and mostly |
|
untargeted stimulus spending. |
|
Can you please address what specific negative economic |
|
impacts may occur, should too much untargeted stimulus be |
|
placed into the economy, Dr. Strain? |
|
Mr. Strain. There is a risk of the economy overheating. |
|
There is a risk of economic demand outpacing growth and |
|
economic supply, which can lead to price inflation. That risk, |
|
I think, is much more concerning in the second half of this |
|
year when people are vaccinated, and they are out there |
|
spending money. |
|
Mrs. Wagner. The Penn Wharton budget model yesterday |
|
released a study estimating that nearly three-quarters of |
|
economic stimulus checks will go toward savings and will not be |
|
used to stimulate the economy. |
|
Are you able to quickly address this study and its results? |
|
Mr. Strain. Yes, as a general matter, I think the evidence |
|
suggests that if you look at households with income above, say, |
|
$75,000, they save the overwhelming majority of the checks they |
|
receive, and that savings is kind of a double-edged sword, |
|
because it reduces concern about economic overheating, but it |
|
amplifies concern about Congress prudently spending money. |
|
There is just no reason, in my view, for Congress to write |
|
checks to six-figure households who haven't suffered any |
|
employment loss so they can pay down credit card bills or make |
|
advance payments on other debts. |
|
Mrs. Wagner. It is certainly not stimulating the economy. |
|
And I want to make the point clear and reiterate again that |
|
currently, there is more than $1 trillion of previously-enacted |
|
stimulus funding remaining to be spent. These remaining funds |
|
include: SBA's PPP program, $280 million; health spending, $239 |
|
billion; EIDL loans, $172 billion; unemployment insurance |
|
expansion, $172 billion; education funding, $59 billion; State |
|
and local aid, $58 billion; stimulus checks, $52 billion; food |
|
stamps, $33 billion; Childcare and Development Block Grants, |
|
$10 billion; and agriculture, $29 billion. |
|
Should Congress see positively where more targeted support |
|
is needed before passing another large stimulus package, that |
|
is my main concern here. |
|
I believe I am out of time, and I yield back. |
|
Chairwoman Waters. Yes, the gentlewoman's time has expired. |
|
I now recognize the gentleman from New York, Mr. Meeks, who |
|
is also the chairman of the House Committee on Foreign Affairs, |
|
for 5 minutes. |
|
Mr. Meeks. Thank you, Madam Chairwoman, and thank you to |
|
all of the witnesses for your testimony today. |
|
I am going to start out with Mr. Anthony. I heard Mr. Hill |
|
state that essentially, we faced an enemy we knew nothing about |
|
in the beginning. And I know that my State of New York was one |
|
of the hardest-hit States first, and it seemed to me at that |
|
particular point, the then-President of the United States |
|
basically underplayed what should and what could be done at |
|
that particular time, as well as aid to States, I know to New |
|
York and to States that were initially hit. |
|
So, my question is, if you had a State like New York, which |
|
was hit at a time when no one knew what the pandemic was and |
|
how to deal with it, and the States had to take on that burden |
|
themselves, can you speak to the budgetary needs of the first- |
|
hit States that now need this money, as far as aid to cities |
|
and States, as far as them being able to benefit from already, |
|
and other States learning from them and the practices that they |
|
had to undergo, being one of those first States and earlier |
|
States hit? |
|
Mr. Anthony. Yes. Thank you very much, Congressman Meeks, |
|
for that question. |
|
All of us have indicated that this is a pandemic that none |
|
of us was prepared for, and so when we received the CARES Act, |
|
as Congress knows, those first dollars went to States and |
|
cities with populations of 500,000 or more. And what local |
|
governments under 500,000 had to do was to go begging State |
|
Governors and others for those dollars to address the problems |
|
that they were facing in terms of the implementation of the |
|
response. |
|
Cities, the mayors, the councilmembers, rural cities, small |
|
and large cities, as you said, Congressman Meeks, as well as |
|
States, had to put an infrastructure system together. We did, |
|
but yet, we spent money at the city level that we did not have, |
|
to respond to the needs, and now we are at $90 billion, |
|
estimated, that we have lost, plus all of the employees, |
|
32,000, up to a million employees, we have had to lose, because |
|
we don't have the reserves, we don't have the budget dollars. |
|
So, we are just asking that $350 billion be provided to |
|
State and local governments to continue helping America return |
|
to creativity and jobs and recovery. So, that is the bottom |
|
line. We weren't prepared. America wasn't prepared, but we want |
|
some additional dollars. |
|
Mr. Meeks. Thank you for that. |
|
And Dr. Spriggs, many economists have argued that our |
|
recovery from the 2008 financial crisis was so slow and drawn |
|
out because we did too little with respect to economic |
|
stimulus; accordingly, certain communities were |
|
disproportionately impacted and lost wealth unnecessarily. So, |
|
in your opinion, what is riskier, doing too little by way of |
|
stimulus or doing too much? |
|
Mr. Spriggs. It is far riskier in this situation that we do |
|
too little. We must think big. |
|
The fear of inflation that we heard about, that will occur |
|
if we don't do enough. Because if we don't keep workers intact |
|
and whole so that their employers can find them, if we let |
|
workers become homeless, it will be harder to reconnect workers |
|
and reignite the economy. |
|
We have to take care of the workers who are most directly |
|
impacted now with adequate support for their rent, adequate |
|
support for their income, adequate support for those who fall |
|
through the cracks because their unemployment insurance needs |
|
drastic modernization. |
|
So, my fear is not that we are going to do too much, it is |
|
that we will do too little, and the outcome will be that it |
|
will be too difficult to put our labor market back together. |
|
Mr. Meeks. Thank you so much. |
|
I am out of time, so I will yield back. |
|
Chairwoman Waters. Thank you so very much, Chairman Meeks. |
|
The gentleman from Florida, Mr. Posey, is recognized for 5 |
|
minutes. |
|
Mr. Posey. Thank you, Madam Chairwoman, and Mr. Ranking |
|
Member. It is good to be back here on the Financial Services |
|
Committee again in this new Congress, and thank you for holding |
|
this hearing today. |
|
The events of last year have been like nothing we have ever |
|
experienced in our lifetimes. The pandemic has brought |
|
intolerable suffering and lasting economic harm. |
|
In this time of pain, Congress has to help so many |
|
Americans, and Congress has enacted over $3.5 trillion in |
|
relief for people who, through no fault of their own, faced |
|
unemployment, shutdowns, and the inability to pay rent, put |
|
food on the table, and hold their businesses together. |
|
I know all of the Members have worked very hard to help |
|
people access COVID relief programs, and I am proud to be able |
|
to help my constituents figure it out. But as I have said, we |
|
have spent $3.5 trillion on COVID relief since last spring. |
|
During Fiscal Year 2020, our deficit was $3.1 trillion. Since |
|
October 2019, the Federal debt held by the Federal Reserve has |
|
grown from $2.4 trillion to nearly $4.9 trillion by the end of |
|
the third quarter of last year. |
|
That means that during this period, the Fed monetized about |
|
$2.5 trillion of added debt spending. We have been financing up |
|
to two-thirds of our debt by running printing presses. Since |
|
new relief spending will come at the expense of borrowing money |
|
from the Fed, I support proposals to moderate the next round |
|
and target such spending on families and workers who need it. |
|
I am particularly concerned about initiatives to provide |
|
extraordinary assistance to State and local governments, and I |
|
would like to ask Dr. Strain if it would be fair to replace |
|
COVID-19-related revenue losses of all of the States, dollar- |
|
for-dollar? Wouldn't it be unfair to the States that have a |
|
more balanced approach to government and its size? |
|
Mr. Strain. Thank you, Congressman. |
|
I think that it is appropriate for Congress to help State |
|
and local governments with revenue losses, but that help should |
|
be tied to pandemic-related revenue losses. So, Congress should |
|
not bail out States that misuse rainy-day funds. And Congress |
|
certainly shouldn't bail out mismanaged pension funds. |
|
But I think an amount close to $100 billion would be |
|
appropriate for Congress to give to States and localities, many |
|
of whom really are in need. My concern is that not doing so |
|
will act as a drag on the national economic recovery, because |
|
States and localities won't be able to hire back workers they |
|
have laid off. |
|
Mr. Posey. Thank you very much for that answer. |
|
How do you think we should go about determining the amount |
|
of the distribution? |
|
Mr. Strain. A formula could be created that looked at where |
|
State revenues were on the eve of the pandemic, and then |
|
attempted to estimate how States actually fared, relative to |
|
reasonable projections that, again, focused on pandemic losses. |
|
Some States wouldn't need much money at all. Some States |
|
have seen sales taxes recover, and have good income tax |
|
revenue. But there are some States, particularly States that |
|
rely a lot on tourism or that rely on more in-person services, |
|
that have taken a big hit as a consequence of the pandemic, and |
|
I think it is appropriate for Congress to help, if for no other |
|
reason than to support the overall national recovery. |
|
Mr. Posey. I agree, and I thank you for that. |
|
What do you think the major items should be and how should |
|
we estimate them, do you have any thoughts on that? |
|
Mr. Strain. Congress has already appropriated several |
|
hundred billion dollars to States and localities. Much of that |
|
funding is for specific programs, for example, for the Medicaid |
|
program. I think what is needed now is to give States more |
|
discretion so they can fill in the holes that are unique to |
|
their States and localities. |
|
Mr. Posey. Thank you very much. |
|
Madam Chairwoman, I yield back. |
|
Chairwoman Waters. Thank you very much. |
|
The gentleman from Georgia, Mr. Scott, who is also the |
|
chairman of the House Committee on Agriculture, is recognized |
|
for 5 minutes. |
|
Mr. Scott. Thank you very much, Madam Chairwoman. |
|
This is a great hearing. Let me just sort of get right to |
|
the point here. |
|
Earlier on, Chairwoman Waters had asked me to kind of zero |
|
in on helping with the HEROES Act and the preceding stimulus |
|
packages on the housing relief for homeowners. And so, we put a |
|
package together that would get, I think initially, I forgot |
|
the figure now, but right now, that figure is at $25 billion |
|
for rental assistance. We started out with some higher numbers. |
|
We also wanted to get money in to help with utilities. So, |
|
right now, it is $5 billion for aid to help keep the water and |
|
the lights and the electricity on. |
|
But then when we got down to the mortgage assistance, we |
|
are still in a process of trying to get that in. So, Mr. |
|
Anthony, I want you to comment on how important it is. |
|
And we also have to understand one of the reasons is that |
|
Chairwoman Waters and I were here back during the time, and I |
|
think it was 2008 when they had the Wall Street breakdown, and |
|
we put the Hardest Hit Program, which dealt with keeping folks |
|
in their homes. This is critical, but right now, we don't have |
|
anything there. |
|
I wanted to share with the committee what the progress is |
|
on that right now. Our House Financial Services Committee, the |
|
Senate Banking Committee, and the White House right now are |
|
trying to get language in. |
|
So, I wanted to get your opinion, Mr. Anthony, because, |
|
even with some of the money that we have gotten in this area, |
|
even back in 2008, 2010, it went to the State to be able to |
|
implement it down to the cities to get that help. But I got |
|
inundated with calls, and still am, because there is a failure |
|
of the State working effectively with our cities in terms of |
|
getting the money to our cities. And as I understand it, part |
|
of that money was even left on the table because there was a |
|
deadline put on that money because of the population |
|
thresholds. Only three governmental units in Georgia were able |
|
to get that money--Cobb and Fulton Counties, and the City of |
|
Atlanta--because of that population threshold. |
|
So, my point is, give us an update on how tragic this is to |
|
get money down to give to the cities and towns. I represent 48 |
|
cities and towns and we are having difficulty in getting that. |
|
Can you tell us what we need to do to correct that problem |
|
and make sure we are getting that money out to our cities and |
|
municipalities? |
|
Mr. Anthony. Yes, thank you very much, Congressman Scott, |
|
for that question. |
|
The issue was that the dollars, again, went to cities of |
|
500,000 or more population. And it was very challenging to get |
|
through the bureaucracy of working to get it down to the people |
|
from the State, and then to the county, and then to those |
|
cities. |
|
And some of these cities in some States, for example, Iowa, |
|
had no cities that qualified for direct funding. And then there |
|
are other States that may have had one. South Carolina had one |
|
city, Columbia, South Carolina. And we had other States, again, |
|
that may have had two cities. |
|
But the issue is, these cities, small and medium-sized |
|
cities, can, in fact, use the Community Development Block Grant |
|
formula to get direct funding so they can get it out and solve |
|
some of these issues. |
|
The rental assistance program had like 40 million people |
|
right now that are on the brink of eviction. So, I will stop |
|
there, Congressman. |
|
Mr. Scott. Yes, thank you very much. |
|
In my remaining seconds, I want everybody to know, also, |
|
that we have a food shortage. We have a hunger problem here. As |
|
chairman of the Agriculture Committee, I want you to know that |
|
we are going to be in a bit of a fight, because we want to |
|
raise the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) |
|
allocation to 20 percent, 15 to 20 percent. I feel very |
|
strongly we are going to need that, and I just hope everybody |
|
is ready to fight that battle. |
|
We will be having a hearing on it, on food insecurity in |
|
about 3 weeks. |
|
Chairwoman Waters. The gentleman's time has expired. |
|
Mr. Scott. Thank you, ma'am. |
|
Chairwoman Waters. You're welcome. |
|
The gentleman from Michigan, Mr. Huizenga, is now |
|
recognized for 5 minutes. |
|
Mr. Huizenga. Thank you, Madam Chairwoman. I appreciate |
|
that. And I am sorry if I am going back over a little territory |
|
here with Dr. Strain, but I want to just make sure that we are |
|
covering this. |
|
Dr. Strain, what actions do we need to take here that could |
|
best provide a boost to the economy? Is it direct payments? Is |
|
it additional unemployment insurance? Is it ultra-low interest |
|
rates, which we are seeing? What is it that would actually |
|
provide the biggest boost? |
|
Mr. Strain. Thank you, Congressman. |
|
I think the direct payments would be a mistake and an |
|
imprudent use of government spending. The unemployment benefits |
|
the President is proposing actually would hold the recovery |
|
back by keeping people unemployed for longer. |
|
The $15-an-hour minimum wage would significantly reduce |
|
employment opportunities. The Congressional Budget Office |
|
estimates that it would reduce employment by over 1 million |
|
jobs for low-wage workers. |
|
The best things that Congress can do in my view are to make |
|
sure that we can actually get vaccines into people's arms, to |
|
make sure that we can test people for COVID-19, to make sure |
|
that households that really are in need, vulnerable households |
|
that really have suffering, can get the help that they need, |
|
not households with six-figure incomes who haven't had any |
|
employment loss, and I think that it would be appropriate for |
|
Congress to help States and municipalities to the tune of |
|
around $100 billion. |
|
Mr. Huizenga. How would you do that for those families, how |
|
would you determine those families who do need that economic |
|
help and support, that safety net? |
|
Because I tend to agree with you, I think there are a |
|
number of families who are doing just fine, who are going to be |
|
receiving these payments. |
|
Mr. Strain. We could use the mechanisms that we already |
|
have in place to help low-income families. The food stamp |
|
program is very well-targeted. The Earned Income Tax Credit is |
|
very well-targeted on low-income households. Making the Child |
|
Tax Credit fully refundable for 2021, I think, would be |
|
perfectly appropriate. |
|
So, the existing programs that we have that target low- |
|
income households, I think, can be utilized in this instance. |
|
Mr. Huizenga. Okay. You brought up the unemployment |
|
insurance situation, and Dr. Spriggs from AFL-CIO, the last |
|
time he appeared here, I brought up the $600 payment, that |
|
kicker, that Federal kicker that was brought up. He had made |
|
the claim, 3 claims kind of spaced out, that that was the only |
|
way that people were able to pay their bills at that time. It |
|
may or may not be true. |
|
He then moved on to the fact that, and said that, I believe |
|
the term he used was this was about racial inequality or |
|
inequity that had been present in the economic system that we |
|
were dealing with. |
|
And then the third thing that he said was that employers, |
|
and this was the word he used, ``refused'' to keep their |
|
employees safe in work conditions. |
|
And so, Dr. Spriggs, I am just curious, do you stand by |
|
those statements now, a number of months later? |
|
Mr. Spriggs. I don't stand by your characterization of my |
|
words, but I stand by my words and I will put them in testimony |
|
again. |
|
Mr. Huizenga. I am not sure-- |
|
Mr. Spriggs. It is still the case that because of the |
|
racial wealth gap, Black and Latino households have no |
|
liquidity. And in a situation where they lose jobs-- |
|
Mr. Huizenga. Reclaiming my time-- |
|
Mr. Spriggs. --if you give them unemployment insurance-- |
|
Mr. Huizenga. Reclaiming my time-- |
|
Mr. Spriggs. --they will rapidly try and gather up |
|
precautionary savings-- |
|
Mr. Huizenga. Madam Chairwoman? |
|
Mr. Spriggs. --and the $600 is still necessary-- |
|
Mr. Huizenga. Can you-- |
|
Mr. Spriggs. --to make up for that inequality. |
|
Mr. Huizenga. Reclaiming my time, so, do you stand by the |
|
fact that employers refuse to keep their employees safe in the |
|
workspace? |
|
Mr. Spriggs. My statement didn't say that. It said that |
|
they were not safe. |
|
Mr. Huizenga. No, you-- |
|
Mr. Spriggs. My statement said that they were not safe and |
|
the evidence is clear. I provided in my written testimony that |
|
the disparities that are going on for low-income workers-- |
|
Chairwoman Waters. The time belongs to-- |
|
Mr. Spriggs. --specifically in California-- |
|
Chairwoman Waters. Mr. Spriggs, the time belongs to-- |
|
Mr. Davidson. A point of order, please, Madam Chairwoman? |
|
Chairwoman Waters. --Mr. Huizenga. |
|
The time belongs to Mr. Huizenga. Please continue, Mr. |
|
Huizenga. |
|
Mr. Hill. Can we put 10 seconds more back on the clock, |
|
Madam Chairwoman? |
|
Chairwoman Waters. Yes, we can. We will. No problem. |
|
Mr. Huizenga. Madam Chairwoman, that was the word that he |
|
used, ``refused,'' so he may or may not stand by those |
|
statements. |
|
But I am curious, if $600 a month wasn't enough, the AFL- |
|
CIO supported the last package, to my understanding, that had |
|
$300 through the end of March. It is now going to be $400 if |
|
the Democrats move ahead with the Biden-only plan through the |
|
end of the year. |
|
And I am curious, if $600 wasn't enough a couple of months |
|
ago, how in the world could the AFL-CIO support something that |
|
is less than that now? It seems to me, that is politics. |
|
So, Dr. Spriggs, I don't know if you care to respond, but |
|
now I will give you the time. |
|
Chairwoman Waters. Thank you. |
|
The time has expired. |
|
The gentleman from Texas, Mr. Green, who is also the |
|
chairman of our Subcommittee on Oversight and Investigations, |
|
is recognized for 5 minutes. |
|
Mr. Green. Thank you, Madam Chairwoman. I greatly |
|
appreciate your opening comments, because I would like to |
|
associate myself with this issue that assistance is something |
|
that is of paramount importance. We have circumstances wherein |
|
persons who are about to be evicted are about to be evicted by |
|
properties that are owned by mom-and-pop landlords, people who |
|
don't necessarily have a mortgage, but they need the income to |
|
sustain themselves. The rent must be paid. |
|
The best way to deal with these issues associated with |
|
eviction would be for the rent to be paid. It obviously |
|
benefits the tenant, because the tenant maintains a home, but |
|
it also benefits those mom-and-pop landlords who need this |
|
income to sustain themselves. The rent must be paid. |
|
The $25 billion that we have proposed that is in this |
|
package is another down payment. It is a continuation of what |
|
must be done. |
|
I don't know what the duration of the pandemic will be, but |
|
the duration of the suffering is still at the level it was |
|
previously, notwithstanding our efforts to help, because, as |
|
has been indicated today, some 40 million may be on the brink |
|
of eviction. Nobody knows what the real number is; I have heard |
|
numbers higher, and I have seen some lower. But the point is, |
|
people are on the edge. They are living on the margins, and we |
|
must pay the rent. |
|
Having said this, I do want to concern myself now with the |
|
$1.4 trillion-plus package or tax cuts in 2017: $1.4 trillion |
|
went to some of the wealthiest people in this country. There |
|
were no hues and cries about, we are paying them too much and |
|
they are getting too much money in their pockets. |
|
They were not suffering. Their rent was paid. There was no |
|
pandemic. Their car notes were paid. But they were not persons |
|
who needed to have some infusion of cash for some specific |
|
reason. We never heard from people who were complaining about |
|
this from the other side. |
|
My dear friends, if there is a moral question about someone |
|
who is getting a six-figure income and we are talking about |
|
maybe $150,000 for them, too, where is the moral issue |
|
associated with putting millions upon millions in the pockets |
|
of persons who are wealthy, who did not express a need for it? |
|
In fact, many of them said, don't do this, I don't need the |
|
money. Many of them did, but we did it, notwithstanding their |
|
hues and cries. |
|
So, I just believe that at some point, we have to |
|
understand that it is not a sin for people in the working class |
|
to get help, because it wasn't a sin, by some standards, for |
|
people who are in the upper class to get help. |
|
So, Mr. Strain, my question to you is this: What was your |
|
position on the wealthy class, the healthy class, what was your |
|
position when they were getting these tax breaks in the |
|
millions? |
|
Mr. Strain. Thank you, Congressman. |
|
My position on the 2017 tax law is that the corporate |
|
provisions, I think, were very good. I have some issues with |
|
the individual-side provisions. So, I don't think I am-- |
|
Mr. Green. I have been doing some research, and I haven't |
|
been able to read where you expressed those concerns. |
|
Do you have a White Paper that you have written that |
|
expressed those concerns? |
|
Mr. Strain. I believe that I expressed those concerns a bit |
|
in commentary and in media interviews, certainly behind-the- |
|
scenes, as well. I don't think I am the forefront-- |
|
Mr. Green. I can appreciate behind-the-scenes, but a lot of |
|
what we have to do to have an impact has to be open and |
|
notorious. You are here, openly and notoriously, expressing |
|
your concerns about the morality associated with working-class |
|
people getting some help. I didn't see that in my research, |
|
openly and notoriously, for the wealthy class. |
|
And with reference to the tax cuts to the corporations, do |
|
you believe that corporations should have received those tax |
|
cuts and still keep those tax cuts? |
|
Mr. Strain. Congressman, I reject your characterization-- |
|
Mr. Green. Seconds left-- |
|
Mr. Strain. I reject your characterization of reducing tax |
|
rates-- |
|
Mr. Green. My time has expired. |
|
Mr. Strain. --as giving a handout to anyone. |
|
Mr. Green. My time has expired. |
|
Mr. Strain. I also reject your characterization of my views |
|
and I-- |
|
Chairwoman Waters. The gentleman's time has expired. |
|
The gentleman from Ohio, Mr. Stivers, is now recognized for |
|
5 minutes. |
|
Mr. Stivers. Thank you, Madam Chairwoman. I appreciate you |
|
holding this hearing. |
|
The most important issue facing us, Madam Chairwoman, as |
|
you know, is recovering our economy and moving past COVID-19 |
|
and getting our kids back in schools, getting our businesses |
|
open, setting the conditions to make that happen, to have |
|
sustainable growth in the future, and to mitigate the suffering |
|
in the meantime. |
|
So, I am curious, Dr. Strain, do you think opening the |
|
economy is the best long-term solution toward our economic |
|
growth? |
|
Mr. Strain. Thank you, Congressman. |
|
I think there is really no question about that. Once we get |
|
the virus under control, and once we get people vaccinated, |
|
there is every reason to believe that the economy will bounce |
|
back-- |
|
Mr. Stivers. Okay. Thank you, Dr. Strain. |
|
Mr. Strain. --very strongly. And-- |
|
Mr. Stivers. Thank you. |
|
I only have a short amount of time, and I would like to ask |
|
Mr. Anthony, Mr. Johnson, Ms. Murguia, and Mr. Spriggs, do you |
|
all support vaccinations, one at a time, quickly, yes or no? |
|
Mr. Anthony. Clarence Anthony, I personally support it and |
|
I educate people to take it, but it is their decision, |
|
especially in the Black and-- |
|
Mr. Stivers. I am not asking about mandatory vaccines. I am |
|
asking if you personally support vaccinations. Thank you. |
|
Mr. Johnson? |
|
Mr. Johnson. Yes. |
|
Mr. Stivers. Thank you. |
|
Ms. Murguia. Yes. |
|
Mr. Stivers. Mr. Spriggs? |
|
Mr. Spriggs. Yes, I do. |
|
Mr. Stivers. Thank you. |
|
I want to be clear: I am not for mandatory vaccinations for |
|
people who have religious or personal problems with it, but I |
|
want to educate, and I think that vaccinations are the fastest |
|
way forward. By the way, I did put forward an idea a couple of |
|
weeks ago, that I have since walked away from, of tying the |
|
stimulus payments to the vaccinations. |
|
But I would like to talk to Mr. Johnson about vaccinations. |
|
I read in a front-page story in the Columbus Dispatch that in |
|
Ohio, the vaccination rates among minority communities were |
|
lower than majority communities. |
|
Is there something we should be doing in this bill to help |
|
support vaccinations, whether it is a PR campaign; again, I am |
|
not for mandatory vaccinations, but is there something that we |
|
could do? Is it a distribution issue? Have you dug into that |
|
issue, Mr. Johnson, about what is going on? Is that an anomaly |
|
in Ohio or is that happening around the country? Is there |
|
something that we need to do? |
|
Because I believe vaccinations are one of the fastest ways |
|
to open the economy. |
|
Mr. Johnson. First of all, that is the reality across the |
|
country. It is a trend we have seen that African-American |
|
communities have been disproportionately left out of the |
|
vaccination opportunities. In this bill, we should prioritize |
|
those communities who have been hit hardest first to ensure |
|
that we get those individuals who are critical workers, who are |
|
providing the support. |
|
Second, in this bill, there should be a robust |
|
communications plan investing in African-owned media, and |
|
Latino-owned media to talk to some targeted communities, and |
|
then American-owned media to talk to targeted communities to |
|
ensure the proper education is provided. |
|
Mr. Stivers. Thank you. I really appreciate that. |
|
We need a partnership with really trusted organizations |
|
like the NAACP, Mr. Johnson, as we pursue this. |
|
I have seen some conspiracy theories on social media about |
|
Hank Aaron's death that don't appear to be based in fact, and I |
|
would like to make sure that we address some of those issues, |
|
too. Because while it is true that Mr. Aaron got the |
|
vaccination and passed away, I don't believe, and doctors that |
|
I have seen interviewed have said there seems to be no |
|
correlation between the vaccination and him later dying. |
|
So, is that an issue in the minority community, Mr. |
|
Johnson? |
|
Mr. Johnson. There are some historical questions that many |
|
would like answered, but that is the part of education that |
|
must take place. We stand ready to partner with you or the |
|
committee or anyone in general to ensure that people are |
|
educated around their options, which is most crucial, and in |
|
doing so, we could find ourselves getting out of this pandemic |
|
much quicker if we target impacted communities. |
|
Mr. Stivers. Are we doing enough with testing? Are African |
|
Americans represented enough in the FDA's tests? Is that an |
|
issue, Mr. Johnson? |
|
Mr. Johnson. There is a huge disparity in clinical trials |
|
in terms of the demographics of African Americans and Latinos. |
|
So, we must increase that, as well. |
|
Mr. Stivers. I would like to work-- |
|
Chairwoman Waters. The gentleman's time has expired. |
|
Mr. Stivers. Thank you, Madam Chairwoman. |
|
Chairwoman Waters. Thank you. |
|
Mr. Stivers. I am committed to working with everybody on |
|
those issues. Thank you. |
|
Chairwoman Waters. The gentleman from Missouri, Mr. |
|
Cleaver, who is also the Chair of our Subcommittee on Housing, |
|
Community Development, and Insurance, is now recognized for 5 |
|
minutes. |
|
Mr. Cleaver. Thank you, Madam Chairwoman. |
|
Madam Chairwoman, I am so glad to have Mayor Anthony with |
|
us today. We were mayors back in the day. He started a little |
|
earlier. He was there at the age of--I think, in his 20s. But I |
|
would like to talk with him and Ms. Murguia. |
|
Mayor Anthony, we have a problem in Congress that you can |
|
recognize, maybe most, which is that the Federal Government |
|
leans towards Governors, because most of the people who come |
|
from other divisions, they come from State legislatures, State |
|
senates, and there are only a few of us who were mayors, and so |
|
we tend to do dumb things like, the first CARES Act only wanted |
|
to give direct grants to cities populated over 500,000. We did |
|
fix that, however, but the other thing it might be important |
|
for people to remember is that there are 27 States in our union |
|
that don't have any cities populated over 500,000. |
|
Mr. Mayor, there seems to be this resistance, particularly |
|
on the Republican side, of giving money to cities and States in |
|
our package. |
|
What would you say to them or what can you say to them |
|
right now in terms of that need and what happens if they don't |
|
do it? |
|
Mr. Anthony. Thank you, Congressman Cleaver, for that |
|
opportunity to respond. |
|
What we are seeing, again, is a loss of jobs and loss of |
|
ability to respond to the COVID-19 pandemic that exists |
|
specifically in the neighborhoods and the communities of rural, |
|
small, as well as urban communities. And I think that the |
|
misnomer here is that we are looking for a bailout. |
|
What we are saying is if we are going to get back on track |
|
in America, we must give some support to the level of |
|
government directly to respond, and to create the jobs, and to |
|
be able to help the small businesses, and minority-owned |
|
businesses, help those that have been left behind. So, that is |
|
the bottom line here. We were overlooked in the last bill, |
|
because we did not get direct dollars. |
|
I am just asking that we get a partnership with those |
|
mayors and councilmembers of towns and villages of all sizes to |
|
get them the dollars, Congressman. |
|
Mr. Cleaver. Amen. |
|
Ms. Murguia, I am not going to mention that you are from |
|
Kansas City, I am not trying to rub that in to people, but what |
|
I would like for you to address is that Black and Brown people |
|
end up being disproportionately on the front lines of holding |
|
the country together, but we are on the back lines of receiving |
|
the vaccines. |
|
But even before that, there has been always this resistance |
|
about increasing the minimum wage. Has your organization taken |
|
a position yet on the minimum wage, which we do have in this |
|
package? |
|
Ms. Murguia. Thank you, Congressman, for your leadership. |
|
We absolutely support a $15 increase in the minimum wage. We |
|
understand that an unfair minimum wage disproportionately |
|
affects people of color, including Latinos and African- |
|
Americans, many of whom are often concentrated in low-wage |
|
jobs; for instance, 34 percent of Latinos are earning below |
|
poverty-level wages. |
|
And we know, also, that Congress has not raised the Federal |
|
minimum wage in quite some time. It is currently at $7.25 an |
|
hour, and has been since 2009. So for us, we absolutely |
|
understand how increasing that minimum wage can help provide |
|
needed economic support for these communities who have been |
|
disproportionately impacted, and not just by the pandemic, as I |
|
highlighted in my testimony. |
|
Even in pre-pandemic times, we had seen significant |
|
challenges in terms of income and equality and those underlying |
|
conditions that are systemic that have kept our communities |
|
from being full participants in the economy. So, we absolutely |
|
believe that minimum wage has to be part of a robust recovery |
|
and we support it. |
|
And I will just build quickly, the States and localities, |
|
part of that ecosystem, as you know, Mr. Mayor, Congressman, is |
|
the ecosystem of community-based organizations that are key |
|
links to communities of color for services. And so, Guadalupe |
|
Center or the Mattie Rhodes Center or El Centro, those are all |
|
key to providing important services in this particular time, |
|
and need that funding, as well. |
|
Chairwoman Waters. The gentleman's time has expired. Thank |
|
you. |
|
The gentleman from Kentucky, Mr. Barr, is recognized for 5 |
|
minutes. |
|
Mr. Barr. Thank you, Madam Chairwoman. |
|
And for all of the Americans who are watching this hearing |
|
online or on television, I want to be clear-eyed about what the |
|
Biden Administration and my Democrat friends are doing this |
|
week. This week, Democrats are using a budget procedure |
|
originally designed to cut spending, to pave the way for a |
|
massive spending spree that, with interest, will add over $2 |
|
trillion to the national debt, despite the immediate |
|
availability of over $1 trillion in unspent funds from the |
|
CARES Act, and a $900 billion relief bill passed less than 2 |
|
months ago. That bears repeating: Over $1 trillion in unspent |
|
funds are immediately available for the American people. |
|
I would hope that all of us, on a bipartisan basis, would |
|
focus on actually deploying those funds before we rushed to |
|
saddle future generations of Americans with an additional $2 |
|
trillion in debt. |
|
But one thing we absolutely must do is, do no harm. I want |
|
to explore this minimum wage hike that is included in this |
|
bill, because at a time when so many workers, and especially |
|
low-wage workers, the minority workers that Ms. Murguia was |
|
just talking about, are struggling, one thing we absolutely |
|
should not do is force those workers to lose their only source |
|
of income. |
|
And Congress went to great lengths through the PPP to |
|
ensure that small businesses could keep their employees on the |
|
payroll, yet this proposal from President Biden and |
|
Congressional Democrats to raise the Federal minimum wage to |
|
$15 per hour, without any adjustments based on regional |
|
differences and cost-of-living, would compromise those efforts. |
|
According to the CBO, 1.3 million low-income workers will |
|
lose their jobs because of this misguided proposal. I want my |
|
friends, my Democrat friends who support this policy, who are |
|
well-intentioned, who want to help low-income workers, and I |
|
share their goal, but I want them to hear what I was told by my |
|
local restauranteurs, a sector of the economy that has been |
|
devastated by this pandemic. I have talked to big |
|
restauranteurs with 1,800 employees across all of their |
|
restaurants, and then in some cases, a small restauranteur, who |
|
owns two restaurants in a very low-wage, low cost-of-living |
|
county, Estill County, in my district, and they said it would |
|
be ``catastrophic.'' Those two restaurants would close as a |
|
result of this because of the low cost-of-living. Those 40 |
|
employees would lose their jobs. |
|
And the large restauranteur in Lexington, Kentucky, told me |
|
that because of this policy, his business would lose 70 percent |
|
of their profits and the result would be ``carnage'' for the |
|
tipped employees in his business. |
|
So, Dr. Strain, what would be the impact on low-income |
|
workers, especially those in the distressed restaurant sector, |
|
with this across-the-board hike in the Federal minimum wage |
|
that would destroy jobs? |
|
Mr. Strain. Thank you, Congressman. |
|
Your characterization is correct. I think CBO's estimate of |
|
1.3 million is actually on the low side. There are three States |
|
where the median wage is below $16.50, where half of all |
|
workers earn less than $16.50. There are two dozen States where |
|
half of all workers earn less than $18 or $18.50 an hour. And |
|
in 47 States, over one quarter of workers earn less than $15 an |
|
hour. |
|
So, this would be extremely disruptive, particularly in |
|
low-wage States. But when you think about low-wage States, |
|
think about approximately half of the States. |
|
Mr. Barr. Can I just reclaim my time quickly, because I |
|
know my Democratic colleagues do very much care about, just |
|
like we do, these low-income workers, but the reality is, in |
|
the restaurant sector, in this past year, nearly one in every |
|
five restaurants permanently closed their doors, and over 30 of |
|
the country's largest retail and restaurant companies have |
|
filed for bankruptcy. |
|
Is this the time? Is this really the time to put greater |
|
stress on those employers in their ability to retain workers? |
|
I think this is a devastating policy that will destroy jobs |
|
and kill peoples' ability to stay employed. And with that, my |
|
time has expired, and I yield back. |
|
Chairwoman Waters. Thank you, very much. |
|
The gentleman from Colorado, Mr. Perlmutter, who is also |
|
the chairman of our Subcommittee on Consumer Protection and |
|
Financial Institutions, is recognized for 5 minutes. |
|
Mr. Perlmutter. Thanks, Madam Chairwoman. |
|
And I have to start by saying to my friend, Mr. Barr, I am |
|
your ``Democratic'' friend. I am not your ``Democrat'' friend. |
|
It is the Democratic party. It is not the Democrat party. I |
|
don't call you my ``publican'' friend or ``banana republican'' |
|
friend. You are my Republican friend. |
|
So, please, I am your Democratic friend. It is the |
|
Democratic party. Thank you. |
|
Now, many of my questions have been answered and I thank |
|
the panel, all of you; you have been excellent witnesses. I |
|
would just like to confirm with you, Dr. Strain, and with you, |
|
Mr. Anthony, some numbers that you guys testified to, as to the |
|
need for backfilling, to some degree, State and local |
|
governments. |
|
Dr. Strain, in my notes, I have that you said a $100 |
|
billion for State and local governments probably is your |
|
ballpark number; is that right? |
|
Mr. Strain. Yes, Congressman. I think that would be |
|
appropriate to the need. |
|
Mr. Perlmutter. Okay. And Mr. Anthony, the number that I |
|
had for you was $350 billion; is that correct? |
|
Mr. Anthony. That is correct, Congressman. |
|
Mr. Perlmutter. Okay. Thank you. |
|
I turn my attention to you, Ms. Murguia, even if you are |
|
from Kansas City, which is a shame, and to you, Mr. Johnson. In |
|
Colorado, we noticed an uptick in calls to our housing hotline |
|
in terms of evictions and mortgage delinquencies. Within the |
|
Hispanic and Latinx communities, within the African-American |
|
community, have either of you seen an uptick in concerns about |
|
delinquencies, either with rentals or in homeownership? |
|
And I will start with you, Janet Murguia from Kansas City. |
|
I shouldn't be messing around with Kansas City, but Mr. Cleaver |
|
always makes me crazy about that. |
|
Ms. Murguia. Well, go, Kansas City Chiefs, on Sunday, just |
|
to add another point of emphasis there. |
|
Look, you are right, Congressman. There is no question that |
|
our communities are being impacted very seriously by the rental |
|
and the foreclosures or mortgage challenges. It is one of the |
|
reasons that in my written testimony, I really went to great |
|
lengths to talk about the importance of housing counseling |
|
programs. They can provide that on-the-ground resource where |
|
folks can call and turn to trusted partners and advisors, and |
|
we can provide linguistic and culturally competent information. |
|
And that information is so important right now as they are |
|
navigating the crisis, the confusing messages about what they |
|
can and can't do. It is essential that we expand and deepen |
|
resources for those types of housing assistance programs, in |
|
addition to funds that will help extend eviction moratoriums |
|
and also mortgage relief for some of these individuals. |
|
I found that our network of community-based organizations, |
|
the UnidosUS Affiliate Network, has been extremely effective |
|
when we have the resources to be able to engage on the ground, |
|
because we are seen as trusted partners and we can give them |
|
that important information. But it is essential that those |
|
services be funded as part of this recovery. |
|
Mr. Perlmutter. Thank you. |
|
And Mr. Johnson? |
|
Mr. Johnson. I absolutely agree with Janet, and I also |
|
agree with Congressman Green that there is some immediate need, |
|
not only for the home renters who actually work every day, but |
|
for this pandemic, but also for the homeowners who are |
|
providing access to home rental as a supplemental income |
|
opportunity. It is absolutely vital to provide support as soon |
|
as possible. |
|
Mr. Perlmutter. Thank you. |
|
And I would just like to say that I tried cross-examining |
|
Jim Jordan in the Rules Committee on Zoom the other day. It |
|
didn't work very well. Cross-examining witnesses on Zoom or on |
|
Webex is hard and everybody should just remember that. |
|
I yield back. |
|
Chairwoman Waters. Thank you very much. |
|
The gentleman from Texas, Mr. Williams, is recognized for 5 |
|
minutes. |
|
Mr. Williams of Texas. Thank you, Madam Chairwoman. |
|
In December, Congress passed a bipartisan $900 billion |
|
COVID relief bill, which brings the 10-month total on |
|
coronavirus relief to $3.5 trillion. Now, this means we have |
|
spent more money on COVID relief in less than a year than the |
|
entire GDP of Germany, France, or India. |
|
It is not sustainable or realistic to think the Federal |
|
Government can continue this pace of spending to keep propping |
|
up the U.S. economy, while States are forcing businesses to |
|
remain closed. The only way to get out of this pandemic with |
|
our economy still intact is if we end the lockdowns and put |
|
people back to work. |
|
Dr. Strain, I am going to have 3 questions for you. This |
|
will be the first one. Can you give us some examples of |
|
policies we can be examining in Congress that would incentivize |
|
reopening the economy, that would not require, I repeat, not |
|
require additional Federal spending? |
|
Mr. Strain. Policies that would not require additional |
|
Federal spending? |
|
Congressman, I think there is a need for some additional |
|
Federal spending, to advance your goal of reopening the |
|
economy, and to get shots in arms, to distribute the vaccine |
|
much better than we have seen so far. |
|
I also think that despite the rollout of the vaccine, a |
|
more adequate testing regime would go a long way toward |
|
reopening the economy, as well. So, I think those sorts of |
|
measures would do what you want, but they would cost some |
|
money. |
|
Mr. Williams of Texas. What about liability protection for |
|
businesses? |
|
Mr. Strain. Yes, Congressman, I think that is an important |
|
component. I think you don't want to give businesses blanket |
|
immunity. You want businesses who are grossly negligent to |
|
still be liable. |
|
But businesses are faced with sometimes conflicting |
|
guidance. They are faced with guidance that is changing |
|
relatively rapidly. So, I think if you are a business and you |
|
make a good-faith effort to follow public health guidance, that |
|
a temporary liability shield from frivolous pandemic-related |
|
lawsuits would be very appropriate and advisable. |
|
Mr. Williams of Texas. Thank you. |
|
Secondly, if my friends on the other side of the aisle are |
|
intent on passing another COVID-19 relief package, they should |
|
prioritize reopening the economy, as we've talked about, and |
|
getting people back to work. But, instead, they are looking to |
|
include completely, I think, unrelated liberal policy |
|
priorities such as increasing the minimum wage to $15 an hour. |
|
We have talked a lot about that. |
|
And I just got out of another committee hearing with a |
|
small business where they had 3 witnesses who all said it would |
|
be a disaster to increase the minimum wage to $15. I am a small |
|
business owner in Texas, and I have some experience in that. It |
|
would be a real problem. |
|
Now, Jim Clyburn said back in March that this virus is a |
|
tremendous opportunity to restructure things in their vision. |
|
Now, the Congressional Budget Office, as we have already heard |
|
today, estimates an increase in the minimum wage to this level |
|
could cause over a million workers to lose their jobs, and it |
|
is crazy that a job-killing policy is being considered in the |
|
middle of a pandemic. |
|
So, Dr. Strain, can you discuss how increasing the minimum |
|
wage could affect the rate of the automation in our workforce? |
|
Mr. Strain. Yes, Congressman. |
|
I think the CBO estimate of over a million jobs lost is a |
|
reasonable estimate. I think it is actually too low, given the |
|
fact that we are talking about an increase during a period of |
|
labor market weakness. |
|
I think economic research shows that when the economy is |
|
weak, that the job loss from a minimum wage increase is higher |
|
than in normal times. So, I think it really would be a |
|
significant, significant mistake, that would accrue to the |
|
detriment of low-wage workers. |
|
You asked about automation. The plan to phase this in over |
|
a 4- or 5-year period, I think, on the one hand, blunts the |
|
impact, but on the other hand, if you are a small business |
|
owner, you know that you are in for a period of 4 or 5 years |
|
where every year, your labor costs are going to go up and up. |
|
So, that really, I think, will encourage businesses, since they |
|
know they are looking at a sustained problem that is going to |
|
grow every year, that will encourage businesses to think about |
|
how they can produce goods and services with fewer workers and |
|
that will increase the use of automation. |
|
Mr. Williams of Texas. Thank you very much. |
|
And Madam Chairwoman, I yield back. Thank you. |
|
Chairwoman Waters. Thank you very much. |
|
The gentleman from Illinois, Mr. Foster, is recognized for |
|
5 minutes. |
|
Mr. Foster. Thank you. Ten years ago, when we were |
|
preparing the stimulus bill to revive the economy in response |
|
to the previous economic collapse that the previous Republican |
|
Administration had left us with, we were greeted with |
|
terrifying predictions that the stimulus spending would trigger |
|
hyperinflation, huge increases in government borrowing costs to |
|
debase our currency, and on and on. I can't remember how many |
|
hearings we had on this subject. |
|
And in the 10 years since those predictions, of course, we |
|
saw something very different, actually historically low |
|
inflation and low borrowing costs. And I was wondering, I guess |
|
starting with Dr. Spriggs, what has been learned in that 10 |
|
years about what is wrong with these predictions that are being |
|
made in response to stimulus spending during times of economic |
|
stress? |
|
Mr. Spriggs. We learned from the Great Recession that we |
|
gave too little, and that was an error, and we are trying not |
|
to repeat that. Where we stand right now is where we were at |
|
the depth of the Great Recession. Congress already responded in |
|
March with a very substantial package, to recover from what was |
|
even worse than where we are now. |
|
But it slowed down. In December, we lost jobs. And one of |
|
the things that we know was weak from the recovery during the |
|
Great Recession was that we didn't pay attention to State and |
|
local government. We lost jobs in the State and local |
|
government sector, we left that sector weaker, and we don't |
|
want to repeat that going into this recovery, and we need those |
|
workers so we can go door to door, and we can call people. The |
|
idea that we are going to use computers and people getting |
|
online and setting up appointments is not going to reach the |
|
communities that we need to reach. It is not going to reach |
|
rural communities that don't have internet. It is not going to |
|
reach small cities where internet isn't that strong. We need |
|
local government to have the people in place to really reach |
|
the people, and to make sure that going forward, we have a more |
|
robust recovery. |
|
Mr. Foster. In the 10 years that we have had to study the |
|
response to the last stimulus--it contained a variety of |
|
different measures, and if I recall properly, roughly 40 |
|
percent of that stimulus was tax cuts, some of which actually |
|
went to very wealthy people and some to the working class. |
|
What have we learned about the benefits of things like tax |
|
cuts for the wealthy, compared to assistance to working-class |
|
families, in terms of the bang for the buck, in generating GDP |
|
in response to a crisis, which is more effective? |
|
Mr. Spriggs. We had a much bigger fiscal multiplier by |
|
helping those with lower incomes, and one of the problems from |
|
the recovery during the Great Recession was that we didn't get |
|
wages to rise. Wage growth was very slow, until State and local |
|
governments stepped in and marched us towards $15 an hour. So, |
|
we have to understand that the call to raise the Federal |
|
minimum wage to $15 an hour is not the whole country, because |
|
the whole country is on an uneven path, and those States that |
|
aren't on that path disproportionately have Black workers. |
|
There is a racial equity issue here because Black workers have |
|
not seen their wages respond as quickly since the Great |
|
Recession, and it is in large part because we ensured stronger, |
|
safer economies by doing that. |
|
We have studied, as economists, raises in the minimum wage. |
|
All of these claims of job losses in restaurants is not what we |
|
find in the evidence. The claims by the CBO have to do with |
|
workers who maybe work two jobs, and are asked to deal with |
|
substitution within the household, where maybe the wife decides |
|
she doesn't need to work if the wages are higher. So, it is not |
|
that we mean fewer jobs. It is that some workers may be able to |
|
cut back on their hours. |
|
Mr. Foster. Thank you, and I understand there is another |
|
large effect that if you provide economic benefits to those at |
|
the top of the economic scale, instead of spending in the local |
|
economy, they are much more likely to basically turn it over to |
|
their investment advisors who will advise them to diversify, |
|
and roughly one-third of that money will be invested offshore, |
|
which I think is another new argument about the benefits, of |
|
targeting the benefits at the working families who need it the |
|
most. |
|
I am done here, and I yield back. |
|
Chairwoman Waters. Thank you. The gentleman from Georgia, |
|
Mr. Loudermilk, is recognized for 5 minutes. |
|
Mr. Loudermilk. Thank you, Madam Chairwoman. I am surprised |
|
that my colleagues on the other side of the aisle have all of a |
|
sudden felt the need to rush through this partisan COVID relief |
|
package, when the Speaker actually held up the last one for |
|
over 6 months. We all know that was done purely for political |
|
reasons, to hurt the other President politically in his |
|
campaign. But now, all of a sudden, this is an emergency that |
|
we have to get it out. |
|
There is over $1 trillion of the last several packages |
|
still unspent. Senate Democratic leader Chuck Schumer recently |
|
said it makes no sense to pinch pennies when so many Americans |
|
are struggling. I would argue that it makes no sense to spend |
|
another $2 trillion when there is still more than $1 trillion |
|
of unspent funds from the other packages. |
|
The CBO projects that the December package will grow the |
|
economy 1.5 percent faster in 2021 and 2022, and less than 20 |
|
percent of it has been spent. We should let that package work |
|
and see what else is needed before rushing to pass a colossal |
|
waste of $2 trillion. I appreciate that President Biden and |
|
other Democrats have called for unity and have spoken of the |
|
need for job growth, but actions speak louder than words. They |
|
are pushing a hyperpartisan package, and quite frankly, we |
|
voted yesterday on a budget, and the Budget Committee has not |
|
even been organized yet. There has been no input from |
|
Republicans. There is no bipartisan agreement here. This is |
|
being ramrodded through and it is a package that could destroy, |
|
and I believe will destroy, millions of American jobs. |
|
Here is my question. Mr. Strain, there is an old saying |
|
that you don't raise taxes during a recession. I would argue |
|
that you don't raise the minimum wage during a recession |
|
either. CBO estimates that a $15 minimum wage would destroy 1.3 |
|
million jobs. It would disproportionately increase employment |
|
for part-time workers and those without a high school diploma |
|
and raise the cost for small businesses, and the small |
|
businesses are the ones that have been hurting the most because |
|
of the government shutdowns. Those are the people we should be |
|
helping. It is unconscionable that Congress would pass a policy |
|
to destroy so many jobs when we are trying to recover the |
|
economy. |
|
So, Mr. Strain, can you explain why now is not the time to |
|
raise the minimum wage? |
|
Mr. Strain. Thank you, Congressman. I agree with that. I |
|
think there are several reasons why raising the minimum wage in |
|
a period of labor market weakness leads to a larger amount of |
|
employment loss. Businesses are just more willing to make those |
|
kinds of changes to the way they produce goods and services |
|
when the economy is weak, and when the economy is weak, of |
|
course, there is less demand for businesses, products, and |
|
services to begin with, which also makes them more inclined to |
|
change the structure of their labor forces. |
|
I think it is actually maybe even a little bit worse than |
|
you characterized, Congressman, because the same CBO report |
|
that found 1.3 million job losses also found that a $15 -an- |
|
hour minimum wage would slow economic growth. And so, I just |
|
think that there are many reasons why you don't want to raise |
|
the minimum wage to $15 an hour, and raising the minimum wage |
|
to $15 an hour during a period of elevated unemployment is |
|
adding insult to injury, I think. |
|
Mr. Loudermilk. Thank you. I agree with you there, and |
|
there is another provision in here that gives me grave concern. |
|
Back in August of last year, I was visiting with several of our |
|
local governments, and one of the county commissioners came to |
|
me and said, ``Look, please do something for us. Will you stop |
|
the unemployment subsidies? We don't want any handouts from |
|
Washington. We want you to stop the subsidy because we can't |
|
get our county employees to come back to work because they are |
|
making more money being on unemployment than they were being |
|
paid at their jobs,'' which, according to the economy in |
|
northwest Georgia, they were making good money there. Four |
|
hundred dollars is keeping people out of work and it is hurting |
|
our economy. |
|
Do you agree with me that extending this $400 subsidy for |
|
nearly 2 years is going to be devastating to especially the |
|
small businesses? |
|
Mr. Strain. Yes, Congressman. I think extending the $400 |
|
through September, which is what President Biden is proposing, |
|
would be an act of economic self-harm. When Congress passed the |
|
$600 Federal supplement in March, that was during a period of |
|
time where the country was locked down, and you really did not |
|
want unemployed workers out there trying to find a job because |
|
you didn't want them spreading the coronavirus. That is not the |
|
situation we are going to be in for September. You are going to |
|
have unemployed workers sitting at home and not getting jobs, |
|
when there is no reason for that. |
|
Mr. Loudermilk. Thank you. I yield back. |
|
Chairwoman Waters. The gentleman's time has expired. The |
|
gentlewoman from Ohio, Mrs. Beatty, who is also the Chair of |
|
our Subcommittee on Diversity and Inclusion, is now recognized |
|
for 5 minutes. |
|
Mrs. Beatty. Thank you so much, Madam Chairwoman, and thank |
|
you to the committee, and thank you to all of the witnesses. It |
|
is an honor for me to be here today. Certainly, as we have |
|
heard, and research and the people's comments have supported, |
|
individuals need relief. Small businesses need relief. We know |
|
that when we look at the 440-some thousand individuals dying |
|
from COVID-19, that it is a three-headed pandemic. It is health |
|
care, it is the economic issues that we are dealing with, and |
|
it is the social injustices. |
|
So when it comes to this committee, I want to thank the |
|
Congresswoman for speaking up for all of the people and what we |
|
know to be true. We know that people need more financial |
|
assistance. We know that individuals need relief. We are |
|
hopeful that we will get through this COVID-19 because of |
|
science and medicine. But we know we are not there. |
|
We know cities and communities across this country are |
|
saying, ``Give us relief. Continue the individual |
|
unemployment.'' I think it is unthinkable for anyone to believe |
|
that someone would not go to work because they are getting an |
|
additional $200, $300, or even $600. It comes back to the |
|
economy. Economists have told us that. Wall Street has said to |
|
us, when you look at the stock market and what happens when |
|
individuals get more dollars, what do they do? They buy food. |
|
What do they do? They try to keep a roof over their heads. |
|
I want to thank all of the witnesses, but I want to give a |
|
special thank-you to Mr. Johnson, head of the NAACP, because |
|
last week he brought up former Ambassador Susan Rice to talk |
|
about domestic policy leadership and the issues and racial |
|
justice inequity. He had soon-to-be HUD Secretary Marcia Fudge. |
|
Housing is a big part of what we do under Chairwoman Maxine |
|
Waters' committee. He had me come on to talk about financial |
|
services. And I want to thank you, because when the people |
|
called in, it was Black people, White people, Democrats, and |
|
Republicans, because death and hurting is not a partisan issue. |
|
So, Mr. Johnson, can you help us? When we know that it |
|
comes to people who are affected most by COVID-19, whether it |
|
be medically or economically, African Americans have borne the |
|
brunt of this pandemic, so is there anything, as head of the |
|
NAACP, that you want to elaborate on, that we still need to do |
|
in Congress to ensure that all communities who have suffered |
|
are made whole? |
|
Mr. Johnson. Thank you, Chairwoman Beatty. Three quick |
|
things. First, is a targeted approach to ensure that |
|
communities who are most at risk receive the vaccine |
|
immediately. Second, I have never heard that giving people in |
|
need of money, more money, will hurt people in need of money. |
|
That is a concept I am not familiar with. We need to ensure |
|
that we stabilize our economy. It fuels more resources in |
|
people's hands, not corporations, but those people who use |
|
those funds to support the very small businesses that many of |
|
them work for, like the Henry Ford Model. He paid his workers |
|
more because he wanted to sell more cars. |
|
And then third, I always go back to the looming student |
|
debt crisis. We depend on our governmental workers, local and |
|
State, teachers, and they are suffocating under the burden of |
|
student loan debt in the midst of a pandemic, in the midst of |
|
an economic crisis. We must give those individuals relief, and |
|
if we do so that can stimulate the economy, because the $300 to |
|
$500 that they are paying in monthly student loans will go |
|
right back into the economy. |
|
Mrs. Beatty. Thank you. Dr. Spriggs, can you tell us a |
|
little bit about the economy and the consequences of not |
|
providing more rental assistance dollars? |
|
Mr. Spriggs. Thank you, Congresswoman. We are risking too |
|
much going in the economy because all workers in America make |
|
too little money. The size of this package is evidence to us |
|
how little we have put in the hands of our workers, keeping |
|
them from being individually resilient in the face of crises. |
|
Letting them become homeless complicates this situation. If you |
|
are a long-term unemployed worker, it is very hard to reconnect |
|
you to the labor force. Letting you become homeless is |
|
virtually impossible. That is too steep a challenge for us to |
|
face. It is penny wise and pound foolish for us not to make the |
|
investment now to prevent the scarring of homelessness-- |
|
Chairwoman Waters. The gentlewoman's time has expired. |
|
Thank you. |
|
Mrs. Beatty. Thank you. |
|
Chairwoman Waters. The gentleman from Ohio, Mr. Davidson, |
|
is now recognized for 5 minutes. |
|
Mr. Davidson. Thank you, Madam Chairwoman. And I thank our |
|
witnesses. This is certainly a timely hearing and one that |
|
deserves a lot of attention. Frankly, over the past year, |
|
nearly $5 trillion has been voted on here in this body to add |
|
to the monetary supply of the United States of America. |
|
One of the agenda items is that the Fed's dual mandate |
|
should be updated to address economic inequality. The proposals |
|
behind that, from the Majority, focus on more redistribution. |
|
They want the Fed to take money that we cannot even print fast |
|
enough and redistribute it. They want the Fed to make loans |
|
that the market would never actually make. And they want the |
|
American taxpayer to underwrite risks that no one rationally |
|
would take. |
|
The Federal Reserve is adding to this inequality massively, |
|
because what they are doing isn't driving a huge amount of |
|
consumer price inflation. It isn't driving that kind of |
|
inflation because that money does not make it to the average |
|
American worker. That money makes it to people who are wealthy, |
|
people who have a large portion of their net worth tied up in |
|
marketable securities. And that is why right now, in the midst |
|
of this pandemic, where much of Main Street is decimated, Wall |
|
Street is having its best days ever. You are seeing the S&P 500 |
|
hit record highs with no correlation to the activity on Main |
|
Street. Lots of hope for the future, but we had lots of hope |
|
for the future at this time last year, and we weren't yet |
|
reacting to the COVID-19 pandemic. |
|
When those asset prices become inflated, the wealth gap |
|
grows. The wealthy benefit from this right now. Jeff Bezos |
|
doesn't even pay the capital gains tax on his shares. He simply |
|
borrows against their value, which is rational in our current |
|
Tax Code. |
|
But while the worker, the American worker back home in Ohio |
|
is busy working his hourly job, or hoping to be able to get |
|
back to it because it has been crippled not entirely by the |
|
virus but by the government's reaction to it, is happy that his |
|
401(k) or his IRA has gone up, but that is for future earnings. |
|
That is not for money that can be spent today. That is hope for |
|
someday. But meanwhile, the value of those dollars being |
|
deposited in his paycheck are destroying--destroying--our |
|
economy. |
|
When I first got to Congress, I wasn't sure that people |
|
were aware that this destruction was taking place. But the sad |
|
thing is that they are, and they want to misdirect and blame |
|
things like the Tax Code or employers or things like that. And |
|
I don't want to say there is no fault anywhere, but the biggest |
|
pump-and-dump scheme going on in America right now is being |
|
driven by the Federal Reserve. We need to get back to sound |
|
money and have a sound, rational basis for our monetary policy. |
|
These economic distortions are crippling not just America's |
|
economy but the global economy. Developed economies around the |
|
world are talking about going to real negative nominal rates. |
|
The real rate for interest right now is already negative. No |
|
one really believes that the rate of inflation over the next 10 |
|
years is going to be less than 1 percent. But that is what |
|
happens when you wire Treasuries. It is central planning. It is |
|
distorting pricing. |
|
And that is not an attack against the whole concept of |
|
central banks. Our central bank has been effective. In March, |
|
and in April, in particular, it is a case study in why central |
|
banks should exist. They provided essential stability to make |
|
our markets function. It was incredible. A number of programs |
|
implemented swiftly and decisively when there was literally no |
|
buy side for, for example, the safest assets, municipal bonds. |
|
Super safe assets. A market only functions when there is |
|
equilibrium between buyers and sellers, and when there is no |
|
buy side, the market is in freefall. So I commend the Federal |
|
Reserve for that, but since that time we have seen massive |
|
economic distortion, and it not going to end well. |
|
Look, billionaires will lose billions of dollars. They may |
|
even lose a higher percentage of their net worth. But the |
|
working men and women of America are harmed by this economic |
|
distortion. We have to get back to sound money. Now, the idea |
|
to print even more of this money that we don't have, robs from |
|
future consumption. Dr. Strain, you have spoken well of this |
|
economic distortion. I want to give you a chance to talk about |
|
the consequence of spending future earnings of the American |
|
people. What kinds of consequences might we expect from this |
|
economic distortion? |
|
Mr. Strain. Thank you, Congressman. I think it is |
|
appropriate for Congress to spend money to support households |
|
and businesses and to fight the virus, and I think that the |
|
CARES Act really did a great deal of good for American |
|
businesses and households. |
|
Mr. Davidson. Thank you for that, and I would agree with |
|
you that it did a very good-- |
|
Chairwoman Waters. The gentleman's time has expired. |
|
Mr. Davidson. --job in the essential moments, as I |
|
highlighted. So, I appreciate that final comment, and I yield |
|
back. |
|
Chairwoman Waters. Thank you. The gentleman's time has |
|
expired. The gentleman from California, Mr. Vargas, is |
|
recognized for 5 minutes. |
|
Mr. Vargas. Thank you very much, Madam Chairwoman, and I |
|
also want to thank the Republican Ranking Member today for this |
|
hearing. I do think it is very timely, and I first want to say |
|
that I do agree with some of the things that were said by my |
|
good friends from Ohio, certainly Representative Stivers. I |
|
think it is very important that we get the vaccine out in as |
|
many arms as we can. And I do think that my good friend, Mr. |
|
Davidson, what he just said, there is that distortion where you |
|
have now the wealthy getting wealthier and wealthier and the |
|
poor and the working class falling behind, that is something |
|
that is real and we have to work on it. |
|
However, at the same time, I have to say I listened to most |
|
of my other colleagues on the other side and it seems that they |
|
want to figure out how to give the working class and the poor |
|
as little possible help as they possibly can, and the wealthy |
|
as much as they possibly can through tax cuts. It was |
|
interesting to hear a scold today tell us about how we are |
|
going to add trillions of dollars through this potential |
|
process, when that same person, a few years ago, voted in favor |
|
to adding trillions of dollars to the long-term debt by doing |
|
the tax cuts for the wealthy, that even Dr. Strain said he had |
|
problem with, at least with the individuals, not with the |
|
corporations. I do not want to put words in his mouth. |
|
That, to me, is crazy. That is as looney as I think this |
|
QAnon stuff, that we make the wealthier wealthy and the poor |
|
and the middle class, we give them as little help as possible. |
|
That doesn't make any sense to me at all. It doesn't make any |
|
sense. That is not why government exists and that is not what |
|
we should be doing. |
|
I do want to ask a couple of questions here before I become |
|
the scold in the rank here. Ms. Murguia, you were talking about |
|
the losses suffered by Latinos, and they are very painful in my |
|
district, of course, which is predominantly Latino. You talked |
|
about how they are 3 times as likely to die because of COVID- |
|
19, and twice as likely to get sick, and the losses that we |
|
have suffered. And then you have talked about some of the |
|
things that we can do. What else can we do? You mentioned some, |
|
but what else? |
|
Ms. Murguia. Thank you, Congressman. I appreciate your |
|
comments. And I think I would just say, in addition to what you |
|
have laid out, in terms of making sure we are concentrating on |
|
targeted relief to those who have been the essential workers, |
|
and what we have found is that the Federal relief so far has |
|
not included those essential workers. And as you know, |
|
Congressman--you have worked a lot on behalf of Dreamers and |
|
many who have been undocumented, who are yet filling the lines |
|
of folks who are helping our country right now, whether it is |
|
in the fields as farm workers, whether it is in meat processing |
|
plants, whether it is stocking shelves or actually delivering |
|
food, or whether it is providing care to all of these folks who |
|
are in need of health professionals. But yet, we have found |
|
that Federal relief, because of these families being mixed |
|
status, the relief has not gone there. But they have provided |
|
the work, the services to keep things going. |
|
So we have argued, as you have heard, that we should make |
|
sure that all essential workers, regardless of their status, |
|
many who are families who have U.S. citizen children, should be |
|
included, and that we should take the step to look at, perhaps |
|
in a reconciliation bill, maybe addressing, first and foremost, |
|
how we can provide protected status for these folks. Because |
|
they are going to continue to keep the economy going from this |
|
particular moment and into the future. |
|
Mr. Vargas. Thank you very much. I appreciate that. |
|
I also want to ask Mr. Anthony, I was on the San Diego City |
|
Council for a number of years when I started my political |
|
career, and the City and a lot of the little cities that I have |
|
in my district are really suffering at this moment. They are |
|
working hard but they are suffering. How can we help them, |
|
through this package? You have talked a little bit about that, |
|
but could you expand on that? Because I know that they work |
|
hard. At the same time, they are in desperate need. |
|
Mr. Anthony. Yes. Thank you, Congressman, for asking that |
|
question. I think the way in which we could be of help to those |
|
small and especially the rural communities is to be able to get |
|
those dollars in the hands of those local leaders who can |
|
actually create those programs such as the food programs. Also |
|
to be able to help them keep their employees so that we can get |
|
our economy started back up through permitting, housing, and |
|
capital investments. Again, this is not a bailout. This is |
|
being able to help them administer the programs that you, in |
|
fact, are approving through the past stimulus projects as well. |
|
Thank you, Congressman. |
|
Chairwoman Waters. The gentleman's time has expired. |
|
Mr. Vargas. Thank you. |
|
Chairwoman Waters. The gentleman from North Carolina, Mr. |
|
Budd, is recognized for 5 minutes. |
|
Mr. Budd. Thank you, Madam Chairwoman. I just want to |
|
confirm, Dr. Strain, can you hear me okay? |
|
Mr. Strain. Yes, sir. |
|
Mr. Budd. Thank you. I appreciate you being here today. |
|
Over the past 11 months, Congress has appropriated nearly $3.5 |
|
trillion to stimulate the economy and support families, |
|
workers, and small businesses. Today, we are discussing the |
|
newest plan proposed by President Biden which is seeking to add |
|
$1.9 trillion in untargeted relief. I am supportive of the |
|
widespread testing, I am supportive of vaccinations, and I |
|
believe that these are both critical components to opening |
|
safely. But I also strongly believe that additional funding, if |
|
necessary, should be targeted to meet those needs. Keep in mind |
|
that a majority of the funds we appropriated in the December |
|
COVID package has remained untapped. |
|
So my question is this: How will the new untargeted |
|
spending provide greater benefit to our economy that the |
|
already appropriated $3.5 trillion hasn't, and is this even |
|
necessary? |
|
Mr. Strain. Thank you, Congressman. I think much of it is |
|
unnecessary and a good chunk of it is actually actively |
|
harmful. The checks to households, a whole lot of that money is |
|
going to go into savings. That is not going to help support the |
|
recovery. The reason it is going to go into savings is because |
|
so much of it would go to households earning well above median |
|
income, earning six figures a year, who haven't suffered any |
|
employment losses. |
|
The unemployment insurance supplement of $400 a week |
|
through September, I think will be actively harmful. On the one |
|
hand, it will support consumer spending. On the other hand, it |
|
is going to act to keep people unemployed for longer, at a time |
|
when most likely the vaccines are in wide distribution and we |
|
want people to be getting back to work. The $15-an-hour minimum |
|
wage will be actively harmful to helping low-wage workers keep |
|
jobs, get back to work, and get back on their feet. |
|
So I think you are right, Congressman, that we should be |
|
looking at the actual needs here, and I think it is appropriate |
|
for Congress to spend some more money this month on addressing |
|
those needs. But large portions of the President's proposal |
|
wouldn't do much good, and large portions of the President's |
|
proposal would actually do harm. |
|
Mr. Budd. Thank you. I also want to ask, we have seen the |
|
devastating impacts that widespread lockdowns have had on our |
|
economy. Just last month, the Labor Department reported that |
|
our economy lost 140,000 jobs, and we are used to, over the |
|
last several years, adding jobs by the hundreds of thousands, |
|
but now we have lost 140,000 jobs, the bulk of which came from |
|
States that have endured long-lasting and broad lockdowns. |
|
States with less restrictions are rebounding at a rapid pace. |
|
So, Dr. Strain, do you believe that the most effective way |
|
to support the economy is to safely open it up? |
|
Mr. Strain. Yes, Congressman. I don't think there is really |
|
any doubt that in order to fully recover from the pandemic, we |
|
need the economy to be reopened. And the best way to get the |
|
economy reopened is to get vaccine shots in people's arms. I |
|
think that the inability to do that quickly, the fact that |
|
vaccines have been sitting in storerooms and not being |
|
administered is a national scandal, and I think it is very |
|
appropriate for Congress to figure out what it can do to help |
|
get people vaccinated. Because the faster we do that, the |
|
faster we can reopen and the faster we can recover. |
|
Mr. Budd. Thank you. And lastly, Dr. Strain, would you |
|
detail the benefits of using private lending institutions to |
|
operate an emergency loan program instead of creating a |
|
government-run program? |
|
Mr. Strain. One benefit is just speed. And that was a key |
|
reason to rely on private sector lending institutions for the |
|
PPP program, that you wanted to get money to businesses |
|
quickly, and that creating a new government agency to do that |
|
really would have slowed it down. |
|
Another reason, of course, is that the situation we are in |
|
now is temporary, and we should not be kind of changing the |
|
structure of government to support a temporary problem. |
|
Mr. Budd. Very good. I appreciate your time, Dr. Strain, |
|
and, Madam Chairwoman, I yield back. |
|
Chairwoman Waters. Thank you very much. The gentleman from |
|
Florida, Mr. Lawson, is recognized for 5 minutes. |
|
Mr. Lawson. Thank you, Madam Chairwoman, and I would like |
|
to thank the witnesses for being here today. I had an |
|
opportunity to listen to many of the panelists, whom I think |
|
have done a great job. And I am going to talk a little bit from |
|
the small business standpoint, because I have been in small |
|
business for the last 34 years. One of the things that, Mr. |
|
Strain, you said, is that enhancing the minimum wage is going |
|
to really, really hurt small businesses. I wonder if you could |
|
elaborate a little bit more on that and tell me why you think |
|
it is really going to hurt them? Oftentimes, we can draw good |
|
employees if we pay them well, which increases our bottom line |
|
and helps us to do better economically, and we might even have |
|
the opportunity, if we get more resources, to hire other |
|
people. |
|
So, maybe you can elaborate on that a little bit more for |
|
me, please? |
|
Mr. Strain. Yes. Thank you, Congressman. I think the |
|
example that you gave is an example of something that does |
|
happen. When a State or when the Federal Government increases |
|
the minimum wage, you often see businesses hire a different |
|
type of worker. Perhaps, a business was employing workers who |
|
hadn't graduated high school when the minimum wage was $6 or |
|
$6.50. Then, the minimum wage goes up to $7, $8, and they start |
|
to hire workers who have graduated from high school. So in that |
|
instance, the business itself that is doing that is not |
|
necessarily worse off. They are hiring workers who are going to |
|
be more productive and they are able to absorb the minimum wage |
|
that way. |
|
But the person who loses out is the person who didn't |
|
graduate high school, and my concern is that even in situations |
|
where businesses will be okay--and to be clear, when you are |
|
talking about doubling the minimum wage, I think many, many |
|
businesses are going to really struggle. But even those |
|
businesses that don't struggle because they find other ways to |
|
adapt, that doesn't change the fact that the least skilled, |
|
least experienced, most vulnerable workers in society are going |
|
to pay an enormous cost for the minimum wage increase up to |
|
$15. Middle-class households are going to see their incomes go |
|
up, but the cost of the policy is going to be borne by the |
|
least skilled, least experienced, most vulnerable workers in |
|
society, and that is just not a tradeoff that I think Congress |
|
should make. |
|
Mr. Lawson. Okay. Thank you. |
|
Mr. Johnson, I heard you earlier give quite a few analyses |
|
about where we stand, especially with people of color. And I |
|
know how important it is to get the vaccine out there because I |
|
know it is critically important. I represent a lot of rural |
|
areas. How do we get dollars down, because there has been some |
|
consideration this morning about dollars are not really coming |
|
down. Dollars are going to the wrong people who don't really |
|
need it, but in my district, everybody I come in contact with |
|
seems to really need the stimulus dollars to benefit their |
|
families. How do we do that in legislation to make sure that |
|
the dollars that are needed the most by individuals are |
|
stimulating the economy? |
|
Mr. Johnson. Was that question for me? |
|
Mr. Lawson. Yes, sir. |
|
Mr. Johnson. Putting money in people's hands becomes |
|
crucial. That is why we supported the $2,000 stimulus check |
|
that was first stated by the prior President, that many people |
|
now oppose. But we also understand, in terms of the vaccine, |
|
you have to provide access to vaccination closer to where |
|
people live, and if you only provide it through the medical |
|
facilities, you can miss whole communities. Municipalities play |
|
a huge role. Public housing systems play a huge role. |
|
But then, more importantly, to your earlier question about |
|
minimum wage, I have never been able to reconcile this concept |
|
of a free market economy, but we don't want a free market |
|
economy when it comes time to pay people an equitable wage |
|
because people go out of business. We have to pay people their |
|
value, and if we look at what the growth is in terms of the |
|
cost of living, and we are not keeping up the cost of living, |
|
we must supplement or create a space where people can actually |
|
work hard every day and make a living. Every community I have |
|
driven through that appears to be impoverished, I could assure |
|
you those are low-wage workers. We need to raise the floor for |
|
the quality of life. |
|
Chairwoman Waters. Thank you very much. The gentleman's |
|
time has expired. The gentleman from Tennessee, Mr. Kustoff, is |
|
recognized for 5 minutes. |
|
Mr. Kustoff. Thank you, Madam Chairwoman. Thank you for |
|
convening today's hearing, and thank you to all of the |
|
witnesses who have appeared today. |
|
Dr. Strain, if I could talk with you first, you talked in |
|
your testimony in response to other questions about the |
|
enhanced set of employment benefits that we approved in the |
|
CARES Act, and that we renewed, to a lesser level, back in |
|
December. I will tell you that in my district, I have heard |
|
from ``X'' number of employers who told me that they literally |
|
could not get employees to come back to work when they were |
|
receiving those unemployment benefits because they were |
|
literally making more money with these enhanced unemployment |
|
benefits than they were pre-pandemic. |
|
And I will say, with the passage of the CARES Act that we |
|
passed in March, I think we did a lot of things right, as a |
|
Congress, and we did it on a strong bipartisan basis. But my |
|
recollection is that when Secretary Mnuchin, who was |
|
essentially the lead negotiator for the Trump Administration, |
|
talked about the $600 enhanced unemployment benefit, he |
|
essentially said that was a median number. |
|
So my question to you is a little bit wonky, and that is, |
|
if we do approve additional enhanced unemployment benefits, is |
|
there a way to make that locality-based, based on cost of |
|
living for an area? I represent Tennessee, so in my area-- |
|
Arkansas, Mississippi--the cost of living is lower than in |
|
California, New York, and New Jersey. Is there a way for us to |
|
do that, as a Congress, and with the Biden Administration? |
|
Mr. Strain. Congressman, it is a really good question. I |
|
think we saw in the ability of State Governments to administer |
|
unemployment benefits, the inability to handle even the $600 |
|
increase, suggests that their capacity to do something |
|
complicated like that is unfortunately limited. I think you are |
|
right to be thinking about ways to mitigate the damage that |
|
those unemployment benefits could do. |
|
I think a similar solution is just to do them at a much |
|
lower level than $400, or not do them at all, and to make sure |
|
that they stay in effect for a relatively short period of time, |
|
certainly not until September. |
|
When Congress appropriated the $600 as part of the CARES |
|
Act in March, that was an extremely unusual circumstance. The |
|
idea behind the $600, as you said, was to replace completely |
|
the income that unemployed workers would lose when they lost |
|
their job. The reason why that was reasonable to do was because |
|
you did not want unemployed workers trying to find another job, |
|
and the reason you didn't want them trying to find another job |
|
was because if they were trying to find another job, they would |
|
be spreading the virus. This was in March and April when we did |
|
the lockdown. Keep everybody at home. Don't go to work unless |
|
you absolutely have to. Certainly, don't be trying to find a |
|
new job. |
|
That is just not the situation we are in anymore. If we |
|
thought the $600 would keep workers from trying to find a job |
|
in March and April, certainly it is going to keep them from |
|
trying to find a job in July, August, and September, when the |
|
vaccine is going to be in wide distribution. So, I really think |
|
that this is a damaging proposal. |
|
Mr. Kustoff. Thank you very much, Dr. Strain. |
|
Mr. Anthony, if there is another stimulus bill that, in |
|
fact, appropriates money, replaced money for cities, as you |
|
talked about in your testimony, first of all, if you were |
|
writing the bill, would you write in a population threshold for |
|
a city or municipality? And if the answer is yes, what is that |
|
number? |
|
Mr. Anthony. Thank you, Congressman. That has been a |
|
question that many have asked. I think that our perspective as |
|
the National League of Cities is that every mayor, no matter |
|
the size of their community, has been elected to lead and to |
|
make decisions on behalf of that community. And if I then had |
|
to make a formula decision, I would use the Community |
|
Development Block Grant formula, that gets it down to $50,000, |
|
and would require that if money is sent to the State for those |
|
smaller cities, that it be transferred immediately, within 30 |
|
days of receipt of those dollars, down to those communities. |
|
Mr. Kustoff. Thank you. My time has expired. |
|
Chairwoman Waters. Thank you very much. The gentleman from |
|
Guam, Mr. San Nicholas, who is also the Vice Chair of this |
|
committee, is recognized for 5 minutes. |
|
Mr. San Nicholas. Thank you so much, Madam Chairwoman, and |
|
thank you for convening this very important hearing. I think it |
|
is doing a huge service to the American people by allowing them |
|
to really vet the conversations that we are having and to |
|
address what is on the table and also how to speak towards |
|
misnomers that are circulating regarding what is happening |
|
next. I would like to thank our witnesses on the panel for |
|
making time to be with us today. |
|
Madam Chairwoman, I want to address some of these |
|
misperceptions. That way, the American people can have clarity. |
|
First, there is a misperception out there that there is $1 |
|
trillion kind of just sitting out there, that we have already |
|
approved, that is not being spent, and it is creating the |
|
perception that we have money out there that has been made |
|
available that is somehow just not being used. |
|
Mr. Anthony, based on your experience, is it true that $1 |
|
trillion in relief is languishing and wasting away or is it |
|
largely programmed by our States, our cities, and our local |
|
governments? |
|
Mr. Anthony. Yes, Congressman. I think that we know, again, |
|
we were not prepared for a pandemic. No one was. And so if |
|
those dollars have gotten to State and local governments, there |
|
had to be an infrastructure created and a plan. And what we are |
|
seeing is that the States, as well as the mayors and counties, |
|
have those programs, and now those dollars are going to be |
|
spent. |
|
And we also must recognize there is a lagging economy that |
|
is happening. We haven't even seen the worst of what is going |
|
to happen. So, thank you, Congressman. |
|
Mr. San Nicholas. Thank you. Yes, and we are having the |
|
same experience in my district. The money is not languishing |
|
out there. It is being programmed. It has a purpose, and the |
|
purpose is to fulfill the intent of the Congress to make sure |
|
that we are addressing the COVID-19 circumstances and the |
|
relief that needs to go out to our communities. |
|
Mr. Anthony. That is correct. |
|
Mr. San Nicholas. I am looking forward to our local |
|
governments deploying those resources expeditiously, but the |
|
funds that we made available is not somehow money that can all |
|
of a sudden be reprogrammed. It has already been programmed. |
|
Second, there is a misnomer out there that was reiterated |
|
by, I am not sure if it was Dr. Strain, but it is the idea that |
|
the Federal Pandemic Unemployment Compensation (FPUC) was |
|
somehow provided to prevent people from going back to work. We |
|
are talking about the additional supplemental $600, $300, now |
|
$400. That is absolutely incorrect. The purpose of that |
|
resource was because we have millions of Americans who are now |
|
relying on unemployment, and the unemployment compensation |
|
provided by their unemployment insurance in their State, and in |
|
my district, is insufficient to meet the cash flow strains that |
|
they are suffering from because they are no longer able to |
|
work. That supplement is being used to make up the difference |
|
between what they are receiving in unemployment insurance and |
|
what they were actually earning. |
|
And to be perfectly honest, that difference is still very |
|
insufficient: $600 was insufficient; $400 was insufficient; and |
|
$300 is insufficient. And the fact that we are at least |
|
providing something is keeping families from going from being |
|
able to provide, what they are doing for their communities and |
|
bringing money into their households, to now at least having |
|
unemployment, whatever paltry sum that is they are receiving in |
|
their respective districts, plus the supplement that is going |
|
out to support them. |
|
The idea also that we have to engage in a protracted |
|
deficit at this time has me very concerned. We entertained an |
|
amendment just the other day that would have locked up the |
|
ability of this committee to be able to provide any relief |
|
whatsoever if we did not find a budgetary offset. Now, of |
|
course, we should always be mindful of the deficit, but I am |
|
going to ask a very elementary question to Dr. Spriggs, and |
|
forgive me for the elementary nature of it. But is the time for |
|
us to be addressing Federal spending during the pandemic we are |
|
enduring now, or should it be during times of economic |
|
stability? |
|
Dr. Spriggs? |
|
Mr. Spriggs. Thank you, Congressman, for that question. It |
|
should be in times that are normal. We are actually in a war. |
|
The virus has killed more Americans than we lost to combat in |
|
World War II. This is not the time to be looking at a budget. |
|
Now is the time to be looking at, are we successfully winning |
|
our war against this virus? That has to be the number-one |
|
priority. That is what is killing our economy. We cannot heal |
|
the economy until we heal the virus. |
|
Mr. San Nicholas. Thank you, Dr. Spriggs. Madam Chairwoman, |
|
thank you so much, again, for convening this hearing, and |
|
again, thank you to our witnesses for making time for us today. |
|
I yield back. |
|
Chairwoman Waters. The gentleman from Missouri, Mr. |
|
Luetkemeyer, is recognized for 5 minutes. |
|
Mr. Luetkemeyer. Thank you, Madam Chairwoman, and I thank |
|
our witnesses for being here this morning. I certainly |
|
appreciate their willingness to be here and inform us. |
|
But I would like to take a moment, before I begin my |
|
testimony, my questioning, to point out that the testimony for |
|
this hearing was not posted until last night, Madam Chairwoman. |
|
If the Majority wants to have a serious discussion regarding |
|
the needs of American consumers and businesses during this |
|
pandemic, and what Congress should do to enhance economic |
|
recovery, giving Members less than 12 hours overnight to review |
|
and prepare for this hearing is unacceptable. If this was any |
|
indication for how the Majority intends to operate the 117th |
|
Congress, I have serious concerns over what we are trying to |
|
accomplish here. So, I would appreciate more timely responses |
|
by the witnesses and/or the Majority staff who is in charge. |
|
With that, first question. With regards to the stimulus, it |
|
is interesting that Lawrence Summers, who was President |
|
Clinton's Treasury Secretary, and the top economist for Barack |
|
Obama's Administration, Jason Furman [inaudible] the concern |
|
with this pouring of more money into the economy, feeling it |
|
may overheat and cause inflation. Mr. Strain, what would you |
|
say in response to that concern? |
|
Mr. Strain. I share that concern. I think it is commonly |
|
argued that right now, Congress should err on the side of doing |
|
more rather than doing less, and I think that is a reasonable |
|
way to think about the problem, given the balance of risks. I |
|
think there are more risks to doing too little than to doing |
|
too much. |
|
But that is not to say that Congress should pass another |
|
stimulus that is untethered to an assessment of the actual |
|
economic need. The actual economic need is maybe a few hundred |
|
million dollars, something like that. And so, you want to have |
|
the fudge factor to do more than less. But there are real risks |
|
to dumping another $2 trillion on the economy right now, and |
|
one of those risks is a few months where there is some |
|
troubling price inflation. |
|
Mr. Luetkemeyer. One of the things that concerns me is, |
|
there is some money in here, about $350 billion, to bail out |
|
the States. Now, I realize some of the States are struggling a |
|
little bit, but in my own State of Missouri, we ended the |
|
lockdown in mid-May. In 2020, we had a 5 percent increase in |
|
revenue over 2019. Yes, last year we had an increase in revenue |
|
over 2019. We have a 4.4 percent unemployment rate, and over |
|
200,000 jobs that are being unfilled right now. |
|
It seems as though there are a number of States which are |
|
well-managed, from the standpoint of the COVID problem, and |
|
their own budgets and revenues now. It would appear that this |
|
$350 billion is going to bail out some States that are not very |
|
well-managed. What would your comment be on that, Mr. Strain? |
|
Mr. Strain. Look, Congressman, I think you are right that |
|
as a general matter, State and local finances are looking a lot |
|
better than many people thought that they would, and a good |
|
number of States are basically even with 2019, in terms of |
|
revenue. That really varies from State to State. States that |
|
rely a great deal on tourism have taken a big hit. States that |
|
rely relatively more on sales taxes from in-person activities |
|
have taken a big hit. |
|
And so I do think that, looking across all of the States, |
|
there is a hole in terms of revenue of around $100 billion to |
|
$150 billion. And so, I think it is appropriate for Congress to |
|
help States with pandemic-related revenue losses, but not to |
|
help States that just use rainy-day funds, not to help States |
|
bail out pensions. And there are some States that aren't going |
|
to need that much help at all. |
|
Mr. Luetkemeyer. I appreciate that. Yes, I can tell you, I |
|
live very close to the Lake of the Ozarks there in central |
|
Missouri, which is one of the premier recreational |
|
destinations, especially in the summertime. And they actually |
|
had a record amount of visitation last year. So, I think being |
|
open is a big key. It is interesting to me, with the COVID |
|
lockdowns--and I have made this comment before--you look at |
|
Florida and New York and they are roughly the same population; |
|
one is 21 million and the other is 19 million. New York had |
|
only twice as many deaths last year due to COVID as what |
|
Florida did. And yet, Florida is open and California is locked |
|
down, and Florida has a greater elderly population, probably, |
|
than New York. |
|
So, as a result, I am concerned that we are trying to bail |
|
somebody out here instead of actually giving money to--putting |
|
it in places where it actually needs to be targeted to be |
|
helpful. |
|
I understand my time is up. Thank you very much for your |
|
responses. |
|
Chairwoman Waters. Thank you very much, Mr. Luetkemeyer, |
|
and there are many things that I think I could advise you about |
|
publicly. The ranking member and I have an agreement to work |
|
out our concerns, and we are in charge, so I didn't appreciate |
|
your comments earlier. |
|
Mr. Luetkemeyer. I appreciate getting information on time. |
|
Chairwoman Waters. The gentlewoman from Iowa, Mrs. Axne, is |
|
now recognized for 5 minutes. |
|
Mrs. Axne. Thank you, Madam Chairwoman, and thank you, |
|
everyone, for being here today. |
|
Mr. Anthony, I would like to start with you. Cities and |
|
towns, of course, across the country have been fighting to |
|
support people and the communities for the last year as COVID |
|
hit our shores, and I know that nationally, we have lost about |
|
1 million jobs in the State and local government sectors. One |
|
of the areas that I have been really focused on, and this |
|
committee has as well, is housing. Could you tell us a little |
|
bit about how the budget losses and the job losses for State |
|
and local government employees have made it more difficult to |
|
keep people in their homes, and what are some of the steps that |
|
you have had to take to overcome that? |
|
Mr. Anthony. Thank you, Congresswoman, for that question. I |
|
spoke earlier about the eviction level. We are looking at about |
|
40 million renters who are on the cliff of being evicted. |
|
The second data point is that this is a pent-up loss for |
|
even real estate owners of about $7 million of revenue or |
|
renter income that will be lost. |
|
And the final thing is, in city governments and local |
|
governments, period, we are seeing homelessness increase. So we |
|
are dealing with all of those issues and responding. And I |
|
think what this relief package would do is it would help us to |
|
be able to provide programming for those challenges. |
|
Mrs. Axne. I appreciate you saying that, and I thank you so |
|
much, because one thing I know can be an issue for so many of |
|
our constituents during this time is finding the help that they |
|
need and the different programs that are available to them, in |
|
a timeframe by which they need them. |
|
So what can you tell us about how we are helping people |
|
navigate some of these programs so that they can keep a roof |
|
over their heads? |
|
Mr. Anthony. Cities all over America have created rental |
|
assistance programs during this time, but first of all, helping |
|
to get those dollars specifically to nonprofits and to create |
|
programs so that people will be able to come in and get those |
|
dollars. Mayors and councilmembers have created small business |
|
programs as well, small business loan programs, rental |
|
assistance programs, and I think that if we think about the |
|
level of government where people can knock on the front doors |
|
of mayors and the city halls, it is local government. |
|
So, I think that what we are asking for is direct dollars. |
|
We know that we have lost over 1 million jobs. We anticipate |
|
more than $90 billion of additional revenue loss this year. So, |
|
I am begging that we get the dollars out to that level. But I |
|
appreciate that question because it has been desperate in some |
|
cities, not all, but I will tell you that in 95 percent of the |
|
cities--rural, small, as well as urban--the homeless challenge |
|
is increasing. |
|
Mrs. Axne. It is an issue that we face right here in Des |
|
Moines, Iowa, so I absolutely understand. And that fits, |
|
actually, really well, with something that I have been working |
|
on since last spring, which is getting more resources for |
|
housing counselors, who can help people figure out what is |
|
going on, how they can save their money, how they can stay in |
|
their homes, et cetera. |
|
You brought up some facts here, but the last estimates I |
|
saw showed almost $60 billion in rental assistance is needed, |
|
and with the forbearance that has been offered for mortgages, I |
|
think a lot of people are going to need help with that. And, of |
|
course, we saw, after the 2008 financial crisis, that 2 million |
|
people who worked with housing counselors were 3 times as |
|
likely to get loan modifications and then not go into |
|
foreclosure or redefault, which is a great thing for our |
|
communities. |
|
Many of those same benefits--lower costs, more stable |
|
housing--can also help renters when they are in tough straits, |
|
like you mentioned. Ms. Murguia, or anyone else, does that seem |
|
like something--these housing counselors--that we could benefit |
|
from right now? |
|
Ms. Murguia. Yes. Thank you, Congresswoman. I really |
|
appreciate your leadership on this. I know you have seen and |
|
understood the efficacy of using housing counseling programs |
|
and those community-based organizations, those nonprofits, who |
|
are so effective in reinforcing the importance of the steps to |
|
be taken, the information that needs to be provided, to the |
|
most hurt families, the most impacted families, and their |
|
success rate, as you pointed out, is really high. |
|
So, the $700 million-plus for COVID housing counseling |
|
assistance is absolutely necessary. UnidosUS has the largest |
|
Hispanic housing counseling network in the country, and we have |
|
seen first-hand the role that they play, because they are |
|
trusted partners; they have the cultural and language |
|
competencies to be able to provide that service. |
|
Chairwoman Waters. Thank you. The gentlewoman's time has |
|
expired. |
|
Mrs. Axne. Thank you. |
|
Chairwoman Waters. The gentleman from Ohio, Mr. Gonzalez, |
|
is recognized for 5 minutes. |
|
Mr. Gonzalez of Ohio. Thank you, Madam Chairwoman. Quick |
|
check, Dr. Strain, can you hear me? |
|
Mr. Strain. Yes, sir. |
|
Mr. Gonzalez of Ohio. Yes, very good. Thank you. First, I |
|
want to just comment on a couple of things. Some of my friends |
|
on the other side of the aisle have commented that, now is not |
|
the time to worry about deficit spending or where it is going, |
|
and I would offer this. |
|
We are in a pandemic. There is an emergency, and there is a |
|
need to act. I agree with that. But I would offer that it is |
|
always our responsibility to make sure that we are spending |
|
taxpayer dollars wisely and effectively. That is always a |
|
priority. You never get to put that on hold. And I think what |
|
we have done to date has been pretty good, not perfect. But |
|
when we are talking about a $1.9 trillion bill, which, let's be |
|
honest, the justification is pretty poor for a lot of the |
|
spending in there, and a lot of it would be wasteful, I can't |
|
possibly support it. |
|
The second thing I would say is, if there is one thing that |
|
President Biden said in his inaugural address that I think |
|
every single Republican agreed with, and most across the |
|
country, it is that we need to come together. We do need to |
|
come together as one country and solve our problems, and we |
|
need to take the temperature down politically. Unfortunately, |
|
everything that has been done from that speech to today, |
|
including this spending bill, has gone completely counter to |
|
that. And so, I would ask my Democratic colleagues, whom I know |
|
are sincere in this, please help on that, because I will help |
|
anybody who wants to work on that. I don't care who you are. |
|
But if we are going to just jam wish list items, like a $15 |
|
minimum wage, which we know isn't a bipartisan solution, if we |
|
are going to jam a $1.9 trillion spending bill with no |
|
Republican votes, that is not going to bring anybody together, |
|
and you know it. And so, I would ask you to think wisely about |
|
where we are as a country, culturally, emotionally, before we |
|
go down that path. And it sounds like that train has already |
|
left the station, but I would ask you to think twice. |
|
Now, Dr. Strain, you talked about the unemployment rate. |
|
Currently, where is the bulk of the unemployment? What sectors |
|
of the economy? |
|
Mr. Strain. The sectors of the economy that have been hit |
|
the hardest are sectors that feature in-person interaction, so |
|
sectors like retail, trade, leisure, and hospitality. Those are |
|
the sectors that have borne the brunt of unemployment. |
|
Mr. Gonzalez of Ohio. And a $15 minimum wage would do what |
|
to those sectors? |
|
Mr. Strain. It would be a major challenge to workers in |
|
those sectors and a major challenge to businesses in those |
|
sectors as well. |
|
Mr. Gonzalez of Ohio. Yes, I would argue it would be |
|
completely counterproductive, and we asked, where is the |
|
unemployment? It is not an interest rate question. It is not a |
|
stimulus check issue. It is a virus issue. I think we all know |
|
that, and I think that is what you are saying, and that screams |
|
towards quickly getting targeted relief in the form of |
|
vaccines, testing, and anything we can do to defeat the virus. |
|
The faster we defeat the virus, the faster we come back. Now, |
|
we could pass that, I would argue, with broad bipartisan |
|
support later tonight if we wanted to. |
|
And then, the second piece I want to touch on is the |
|
stimulus checks. You mentioned in your testimony--you say, for |
|
example, direct checks to households earning six-figure incomes |
|
that have not experienced employment loss are an unnecessary |
|
and imprudent use of government spending. I agree with that 100 |
|
percent. Have you seen anyone anywhere who has intellectually |
|
or economically justified the notion that we would be paying |
|
people thousands of dollars who have not been economically |
|
harmed by the pandemic? What is the rationale for that? Have |
|
you seen it? |
|
Mr. Strain. Congressman, I haven't seen a rationale that I |
|
found compelling to support those checks. I think you could |
|
make an argument for targeting checks that went to low-income |
|
households that have been really hurting in this economy. But |
|
checks to households earning $150,000, $200,000, and up, there |
|
really is just very little justification for that policy. |
|
Mr. Gonzalez of Ohio. Yes, thank you for that. I agree. I |
|
want to be targeted. I want to help. Anybody who has been |
|
affected by the COVID pandemic economically, I want to be there |
|
to help them. I think most Republicans would agree with that. |
|
This overshoots by a mile, and, again, I would encourage my |
|
Democratic colleagues to come back and work with us. I yield |
|
back. |
|
Chairwoman Waters. Thank you. The gentleman's time has |
|
expired. The gentleman from Illinois, Mr. Casten, is recognized |
|
for 5 minutes. |
|
Mr. Casten. Thank you, Madam Chairwoman. And thank you to |
|
our witnesses. Before I start with my questions, I want to just |
|
respond to something Mr. Barr said. He had noted that a lot of |
|
the public is watching us right now, and it is really important |
|
to understand this budget reconciliation process. This isn't |
|
about being partisan, nonpartisan, or bipartisan. We pass |
|
things by majority rule. The Senate has this goofy filibuster |
|
rule that certain things require 60 votes, and budget |
|
reconciliation is the way we pass things by simple majority. |
|
The last time that my colleagues across the aisle controlled |
|
everything--the House, the Senate, and the White House--they |
|
used budget reconciliation to pass a massive tax cut to |
|
corporations and to take away people's healthcare. |
|
Now that we are in control, we are using budget |
|
reconciliation to address the fact that we are in a pandemic |
|
that has killed 443,000 Americans, and left 12 percent of |
|
Americans hungry, and 60 million people out of work. That is |
|
the right way to use your majority. I do not apologize for it, |
|
and please do not say that this is somehow not worth doing in |
|
the name of bipartisanship or question why that [inaudible]. |
|
I want to move from there to a question for Mr. Spriggs. We |
|
have done a lot of funding so far. We have a lot of support for |
|
small businesses. The PPP program, while it had some slow |
|
rollouts and some hiccups that we are all aware of, has really |
|
been a lifeline for a lot of small businesses, certainly in my |
|
district and across the country. But I think we have lost sight |
|
of the fact that it was designed, first and foremost, to |
|
protect labor. There were no credit checks. It was run with the |
|
SBA. The size of your loan was a function of your employment, |
|
and your ability to convert that into a grant was a function of |
|
making sure that you used it for labor. Again, not perfect, but |
|
it has kept a bunch of people off of unemployment rolls, off of |
|
welfare, not needing COBRA, and out of needing food assistance. |
|
Because we could not get support across the aisle to |
|
support State and local funding, the PPP has really protected |
|
people who work for the private sector or certain classes, |
|
nonprofits. And following your introductory comments, Mr. |
|
Spriggs, we have had about 1.3 million public sector job losses |
|
since February. Correct me if I'm wrong on the math. If we do |
|
not get State and local aid, Mr. Spriggs, do you think that |
|
that 1.3 million number will increase, decrease, or stabilize? |
|
Mr. Spriggs. Thank you for the question, Congressman. If |
|
you don't provide the direct aid, and you have heard this |
|
directly from Mayor Anthony, we are going to continue to lose |
|
jobs at the time we need those workers in place, both to |
|
implement the plans, as the mayor pointed out, that cities and |
|
local communities are trying to put in place, but also to make |
|
sure that we have a full court press in getting people |
|
vaccinated, because we can't do this from the air. We cannot |
|
just do this using the internet and assume that people can log |
|
on and make appointments. This is going to take direct action |
|
from the local level and local governments. |
|
Mr. Casten. Thank you. Mr. Anthony, is there anything you |
|
would like to add to that? Personally, like we all do, I have a |
|
neighbor who is a schoolteacher. I have friends who are cops. |
|
They didn't get any of this protection. Anything you would like |
|
to add or put color on [inaudible]? |
|
Mr. Anthony. Yes, I would just add that Dr. Spriggs has |
|
said it very clearly. If we really want our economy to come |
|
back, it has to start at the local level, and get done quickly. |
|
Our leaders are able to deal with, through distributions, PPE |
|
and the vaccine distribution and education. I know that our |
|
mayors and council members from our rural, as well as urban, |
|
communities are ready to partner with the Federal Government to |
|
get us back on the right track. So thank you, Congressman. |
|
Mr. Casten. Okay. Thank you. Mr. Strain, I have been |
|
reading a little bit of your bio, and I am a Dartmouth guy, so |
|
I won't hold your Cornell degree against you. But if I am |
|
following right, you went to work at the Fed in 2005, and the |
|
Census Bureau in 2008, and you have been AEI since 2012, right? |
|
Do I have that timeline about right? |
|
Mr. Strain. Yes, that is about right, Congressman. |
|
Mr. Casten. I am not going to ask you for particulars, but |
|
have you had any raises during that period? |
|
Mr. Strain. Have I had any raises? |
|
Mr. Casten. Yes, has your salary gone up since the 2008 |
|
time frame? |
|
Mr. Strain. Yes, my salary has gone up. |
|
Mr. Casten. Mine has, as well. As you have earned more |
|
money, did you find that you increased your spending? Do you go |
|
out to dinner more often? Do you ever buy a nicer car, buy a |
|
nicer house? |
|
Mr. Strain. I did not buy a nicer car, but I have increased |
|
my spending. |
|
Mr. Casten. I mention that because the Federal minimum wage |
|
has not gone up during that period. It has been locked since |
|
2009. And as you run your economic forecasts that presume that |
|
somehow if you raise wages to the wealthiest, they will |
|
increase their spending and live a nicer life, but if you raise |
|
it for the poorest, they are not going to be willing to pay |
|
more for a sandwich [inaudible] suggested by some of your math. |
|
Thank you. I yield back. |
|
Chairwoman Waters. Thank you very much. The gentleman from |
|
Tennessee, Mr. Rose, is recognized for 5 minutes. |
|
Mr. Rose. Thank you, Madam Chairwoman, and thanks to |
|
Ranking Member McHenry and Representative Hill for having this |
|
committee hearing today. I am [inaudible] into the 117th |
|
Congress. I am grateful that we are finally getting under way |
|
with the business of the country. |
|
Today, we are discussing the next COVID stimulus package |
|
before the ink has even dried on the last one. As my colleagues |
|
have cited, Republicans and Democrats have negotiated 5 COVID |
|
relief packages totaling $3.5 trillion to address the pandemic |
|
and the economic crisis. A significant portion of the funds |
|
Congress has already allocated are yet to be spent by agencies, |
|
and I believe that before providing additional relief, we must |
|
do a thoughtful review of the programs that have been most |
|
effective and then determine whether to place additional |
|
targeted funds. |
|
Our economy is recovering. The best way to stimulate |
|
economic growth is to safely reopen businesses and schools. Our |
|
focus now needs to be on providing timely, targeted, and |
|
temporary funding to ensure adequate testing and vaccination |
|
supplies get to States across the country. Finally, I would be |
|
remiss if I didn't mention that I find this hearing to be |
|
largely a show, as Democrats in the House, Senate, and the |
|
White House have already moved forward on the path to pass |
|
another COVID package that would completely cut out the voices |
|
and input of Congressional Republicans. |
|
Over the past few weeks, I have spoken with private, not- |
|
for-profit colleges back home in Tennessee, and they are |
|
distressed by President Biden's and the Democrats' stimulus |
|
plan. The President's plan includes funding for all public |
|
colleges and universities, but fails to acknowledge the |
|
majority of private, nonprofit institutions that have felt the |
|
repercussions of this pandemic just like their public |
|
counterparts. There are more than 1,700 degree-granting |
|
private, nonprofit colleges and universities located across the |
|
country which collectively enroll over 5.1 million students and |
|
provide more than 1.2 million administration, faculty, and |
|
staff jobs to the economy. Low-income students, students |
|
regardless of their college choice, face increased challenges |
|
during this time as well as members of faculty and staff. While |
|
these institutions have had access to Federal relief through |
|
the CARES Act, we cannot cut them out of future relief. |
|
Dr. Strain, do you believe there should be parity in the |
|
treatment of these higher education institutions, and could you |
|
speak to the potential negative effects of treating them |
|
differently? |
|
Mr. Strain. Thank you, Congressman. I think as a general |
|
matter, pandemic-related relief should be broad-based and |
|
should be available to businesses that meet a certain |
|
threshold. I think it was appropriate, for example, to limit |
|
PPP grants to businesses of a certain size class. I think it |
|
would be inappropriate to target relief on specific industries |
|
or the specific characteristics of businesses in those |
|
industries. |
|
Mr. Rose. Thank you. We have talked extensively about how |
|
the $15-per-hour minimum wage would destroy millions of jobs, |
|
and I think we can all agree that at a time when our national |
|
unemployment has only just begun to recover from the economic |
|
pain imposed by the COVID-19 lockdown last year, we should not |
|
be jeopardizing the economic security of more than a million |
|
American workers. Dr. Strain, can you discuss the |
|
disproportional negative impact this one-size-fits-all approach |
|
would have on smaller and rural communities like those in the |
|
6th District of Tennessee? |
|
Mr. Strain. I think it would have a significant impact, |
|
Congressman. I think in many American States that are more |
|
rural, you have a lot more workers who earn lower wages in the |
|
labor market. And if you are talking about doubling the minimum |
|
wage in those States or more than doubling it, you are talking |
|
about a policy that is going to impact directly, one-third, |
|
pushing up to the really middle-of-the-wage distribution |
|
workers in that State. And that is just going to make it a lot |
|
harder for them to find jobs. |
|
Mr. Rose. Thank you, and I see my time has expired. Madam |
|
Chairwoman, I yield back. |
|
Chairwoman Waters. Thank you very much. The gentlewoman |
|
from Massachusetts, Ms. Pressley, is recognized for 5 minutes. |
|
Ms. Pressley. Thank you, Madam Chairwoman, and thank you to |
|
our witnesses for joining us here today. We have been living |
|
with this pandemic and the disparities that it has laid bare |
|
for nearly a year, and yet we have consistently fallen short of |
|
fully delivering relief than meets the scale and scope of |
|
people's hurt. These hearings are a critically important |
|
reminder that our work is not done. |
|
The stock market may have recovered, but our communities |
|
have not. My colleague across the aisle said this feels like a |
|
show. Well, in this show, we are centering on the American |
|
people, and it is important that we never lose sight of the |
|
plot, and the plot is the people. The inherent and outstanding |
|
disparities in our public health and economic systems, coupled |
|
with the slow and inequitable rollout of vaccination efforts |
|
across this country, mean that our hardest-hit communities-- |
|
Black, Brown, indigenous--will continue to shoulder the burden |
|
of the pandemic and will be the last to recover, if at all. In |
|
fact, a CBO report projects that while the economy may rebound |
|
in the next year, it will take until 2024 for employment to |
|
return to pre-pandemic levels. |
|
Mr. Spriggs, for those who look to conflate the two, can |
|
you please explain the consequences of an economic recovery |
|
without a labor recovery? |
|
Mr. Spriggs. Thank you, Congresswoman. We have had this |
|
problem in our economy for the last several recoveries where we |
|
have the economy rebound much quicker than the labor market, so |
|
we have to pay attention to that. When we look at things like |
|
unemployment assistance and people projecting when they think |
|
the economy will recover versus when the labor market will |
|
recover, we have to have our ears open, because in September, |
|
it isn't clear whether the labor market will recover. It is |
|
hopeful that because of the vaccinations, our economy will be |
|
much closer to normal operation. But workers will still find it |
|
very difficult to reconnect, and the additional support in |
|
their unemployment insurance will still be necessary. |
|
So, we cannot do what we did in the past, which is have |
|
everyone declare a victory because the stock market is up or |
|
because the unemployment rate nationally is 5 percent or 4\1/2\ |
|
percent. |
|
Ms. Pressley. Thank you. |
|
Mr. Spriggs. That is not cause for celebration. |
|
Ms. Pressley. Thank you. And we know that women of color |
|
accounted for all jobs reported lost in December. So what does |
|
a slow labor recovery mean for them specifically? |
|
Mr. Spriggs. This is why we need to act now, because when |
|
you are unemployed for more than 6 months, it becomes |
|
increasingly difficult for you to find a job. If people become |
|
homeless, then it becomes impossible, and so we can't let this |
|
story take place. We need to get the labor market back as |
|
quickly as we can to have a robust labor market, which is why |
|
we must raise the minimum wage, because it is specifically |
|
Black women who would be left behind if we continue on the path |
|
we are on now. While most Americans are on their way to a $15 |
|
minimum wage, it is disproportionately Black women who are not, |
|
and we need robust wage growth so that we can have sustained |
|
growth, and so that these kinds of recovery efforts won't be as |
|
expensive to the government and our economy won't be as |
|
fragile. |
|
Ms. Pressley. Thank you. And so to that end, since Black |
|
women are disproportionately bearing the brunt of this hurt, |
|
and that certainly is true when it comes to housing, there is |
|
an ACLU analysis of national eviction data. Black women were |
|
filed against for eviction at double the rate of White renters, |
|
and were more likely to be denied housing because of it. In my |
|
district, the Massachusetts 7th, the report found that during |
|
the first month of the pandemic, 78 percent of all evictions in |
|
Boston were filed in communities of color. |
|
So that is why I am partnering with Representatives Tlaib, |
|
Ocasio-Cortez, and Neguse to introduce the Emergency |
|
Homelessness Assistance Act, to provide nearly $5 billion |
|
dollars in additional funding to support those experiencing |
|
homelessness. It is responsive to the needs of community and |
|
the hurt that people are experiencing. This funding includes |
|
support for additional vouchers and the acquisition and |
|
development of non-congregate shelters. Mr. Anthony, many |
|
cities have looked to purchase and convert hotels and motels |
|
into shelter spaces. Why is it critical to give cities and |
|
local providers the flexibility to make these long-term |
|
investments? |
|
Mr. Anthony. Thank you, Congresswoman, for that question. |
|
And you know very well, being a former city council member in |
|
Boston, the challenges that local governments are facing. We |
|
need that flexibility. We need the resources first and the |
|
flexibility to create solutions that will address our local |
|
needs specifically to the cities, and we thank you for your |
|
support on that. |
|
Chairwoman Waters. Thank you. The gentlewoman's time has |
|
expired. The gentleman from Wisconsin, Mr. Steil, is recognized |
|
for 5 minutes. |
|
Mr. Steil. Thank you, Madam Chairwoman. I appreciate your |
|
recalling us back in here a month into Congress. Some of our |
|
colleagues here are in a big hurry to spend more taxpayer |
|
dollars and enact a liberal wish list. And just a few months |
|
ago, we were sitting here in this committee, and committee |
|
Democrats on this committee referred to that liberal spending |
|
wish list as Washington gamesmanship, party politics. One |
|
member described it as a waste of time, but here we are. |
|
This is not what Wisconsin wants. It is not what the |
|
country wants. People in Wisconsin, people across the country, |
|
we want to get back to work. We want our way of life back. We |
|
want to get back to work. Let's talk about where we are today. |
|
Congress and President Trump have already provided $4 trillion |
|
in coronavirus relief, including $915 billion that was |
|
authorized less than 6 weeks ago, and I know, that is what Joe |
|
Biden calls a down payment. But by the latest estimates, almost |
|
a trillion dollars of that has been allocated has not yet been |
|
spent. |
|
And so, let's conceptualize what this means. We have |
|
already provided $12,000 for every single person in the United |
|
States. That is $48,000 for a family of four. You can buy a new |
|
Cadillac car with that kind of money. And about a third of it-- |
|
and this is what is important--nearly $4,000 per person, hasn't |
|
even been spent. And now my colleagues want to move forward and |
|
spend another $1.9 trillion, rammed through on a party-line |
|
vote. That is another $5,700 per person. |
|
And a big portion of these funds would be earmarked for |
|
projects like bailing out States, States like Illinois, that |
|
have been fiscally irresponsible for years. The Illinois |
|
Pension Fund system is absolutely out of control. Meanwhile, in |
|
my home State of Wisconsin, as in many other States, tax |
|
collections turned out to be better than expected. The |
|
Wisconsin Department of Administration just a few days ago |
|
reported that, ``Our State's fiscal condition has remained |
|
remarkably resilient,'' pointing out the continued tax revenue |
|
growth in States like Illinois. Why should Wisconsin have to |
|
bail out States like Illinois? They should not. |
|
But wait, there is more. My colleagues also want to use |
|
this package to push through a whole host of job-killing |
|
measures. Killing the Keystone Pipeline and private sector |
|
infrastructure is not enough. And I appreciate, Dr. Strain, you |
|
discussing some of these policy proposals today. We are living |
|
in a time when far too many small businesses have shut their |
|
doors and workers are out of work. Sixty-one percent of adults |
|
in the United States are currently in the labor force. We |
|
haven't seen labor force rates at this level consistently since |
|
the Carter Administration. If we want to get people back to |
|
work, now is not the time for job-killing ideas. |
|
It is time to slow down the spending spree, and focus, |
|
focus, focus. Focus on what is important. Focus on getting |
|
vaccines to everyone who wants one. Focus on getting kids back |
|
in the classroom. Focus on reopening the economy safely and |
|
responsibly. And the spending spree that we are discussing here |
|
today does not do that. I yield back. |
|
Chairwoman Waters. Thank you very much. The gentleman from |
|
Massachusetts, Mr. Lynch, is recognized for 5 minutes. |
|
Mr. Lynch. Thank you, Madam Chairwoman, and I want to thank |
|
the witnesses as well for your attendance and your testimony. |
|
Mr. Spriggs and Mr. Anthony, in my area, we have, and I |
|
think in most cities around the country, we have a real mix of |
|
small landlords, and then we have some major housing developers |
|
as well. Frankly, I have been surprised at the willingness of a |
|
lot of landlords, big and small, to exercise forbearance with |
|
their tenants. That is just what I am seeing in my community. |
|
Some of my big landlords have come out ahead of Congress, ahead |
|
of the CDC to say, you know what? We are not going to evict |
|
anyone. We are going to work with you. And yet, at the same |
|
time, those big landlords now are saying, look, we have a large |
|
number of workers, electricians, plumbers, laborers, carpenters |
|
that they have kept on the payroll to make sure that the |
|
quality of life in those big developments is maintained. And, |
|
again, I have smaller landlords who are really, because they |
|
only have one or two rental units, really hard-pressed. |
|
Mr. Spriggs and Mr. Anthony, could you talk about what you |
|
are seeing and what you are hearing from your positions and |
|
what you might recommend in terms of providing relief to those |
|
small landlords, and also the larger responsible landlords that |
|
have been trying to do the right thing? |
|
Mr. Spriggs. Yes. I will go first, Congressman, and thank |
|
you for the question. This is why rent assistance is necessary. |
|
It is the best way to help out the landlords, and it is, in |
|
many ways, the first way to help out the landlords. If quite |
|
small landlords are in the awkward position of having to demand |
|
arrears all at once, it is going to be a very difficult |
|
situation. You mentioned it is uncomfortable for many small |
|
landlords. That is why I think the most proven and effective |
|
way to do it is through rental assistance. |
|
Mr. Lynch. Thank you. Mr. Anthony? |
|
Mr. Anthony. Yes, I will just quickly add that--thanks, |
|
Congressman--we are looking at a $7 billion backlog of landlord |
|
rent on properties that they own, and I think that we need to |
|
have some assistance there. And local governments are coming up |
|
with programs, rental assistance programs, to stop those |
|
evictions. And the real impact is not happening to the wealthy. |
|
You are finding a lot of us who are blessed, are moving to |
|
rural communities and buying new properties. But those who are |
|
poor can't leave, and they are stuck with the bill of owning |
|
these properties and having to pay full rent. |
|
Mr. Lynch. Ms. Murguia, would you like to add anything to |
|
that, please? |
|
Ms. Murguia. I would. Thank you, Congressman. I think just |
|
building on the previous comments, we are finding, certainly |
|
within our communities of color, Black and Hispanic landlords |
|
are actually more likely to work with tenants to keep them in |
|
their homes, but, yes, they are facing great financial |
|
struggles, too, because of the pandemic. And we do find that |
|
these smaller landlords, especially those paying off a |
|
mortgage, face some of those challenges that we are hearing |
|
about, small businesses and cash-strapped small businesses, |
|
with not enough money in their pockets at the end of the day. |
|
And so, that is why we think this is another opportunity |
|
for the Federal Government to partner with community-based |
|
lenders, including community development financial institutions |
|
(CDFIs), to perhaps deploy short-term aid or low-interest |
|
financing to help struggling landlords with assets and who are |
|
being solvent through this pandemic. Of course, it is nothing |
|
more than just making sure we are able to get direct assistance |
|
and funding into the hands of those renters, and we do know |
|
that our Latino renters, in particular, use any payments that |
|
they are getting to pay for basic needs, like rent. So, I |
|
appreciate your question and the comments of my colleagues. |
|
Mr. Lynch. Thank you. And, Madam Chairwoman, I just want to |
|
thank you. I know you have been focused on this issue like a |
|
laser. I do want to say to some of my Republican colleagues, |
|
you know I love you, but I can tell by the way you talk about |
|
this, that you have never stood in an unemployment line. And I |
|
have, being an ironworker for 20 years, and you are constantly |
|
working yourself out of a job. I think you might have a |
|
different perspective if you had actually stood in an |
|
unemployment line. The fact that you got a check for $1,000, 5 |
|
months ago, really doesn't amount to much. So with that, I |
|
yield back. Thank you, Madam Chairwoman. |
|
Chairwoman Waters. Thank you so very much. The gentleman |
|
from South Carolina, Mr. Timmons, is now recognized for 5 |
|
minutes. |
|
Mr. Timmons. Thank you, Madam Chairwoman. The only thing |
|
that is going to solve the problem we are currently in is to |
|
reopen the economy as quickly and safely as possible. It seems |
|
today we are talking about three different buckets of spending. |
|
One is the easier-to-reopen bucket, and that is the bucket that |
|
I believe that we should be focusing most of our time and |
|
effort on. The second bucket is the easier-to-stay-closed |
|
bucket, and while that bucket was appropriate in March of last |
|
year when we had our 15 days to slow the spread, 300-plus days |
|
later it is no longer the best use of our resources, and we |
|
should not throw money into that bucket. And then the last |
|
bucket, and I don't even really know what to call it--I guess |
|
you could call it the progressive wish list, policies that have |
|
no chance of becoming law outside of a global pandemic. You can |
|
call it the let-no-crisis-go-to-waste bucket. |
|
And let's start there. I have heard it proposed that we are |
|
going to cancel $1.7 trillion in student loan debt. That has |
|
nothing to with COVID. There is also granting amnesty to 20 |
|
million illegal immigrants. I want to fix immigration. I think |
|
that is something that we should do this Congress, but the idea |
|
that we would do it through budget reconciliation is just |
|
irresponsible. It is not going to happen, and that is really |
|
not part of COVID relief conversations, that are very |
|
important, when we should be spending our time talking about |
|
politics that will actually help. |
|
A $15 minimum wage? I can tell you what that will do to my |
|
business in Greenville, South Carolina, and the other small |
|
businesses in Greenville and Spartanburg, South Carolina. That |
|
makes a lot of sense in New York City and Chicago, but it will |
|
severely impede our ability to not only successfully overcome |
|
COVID, but to even survive as a small business in my district. |
|
So, a $15 minimum wage just doesn't make sense all across the |
|
country. Now, again, that is not a conversation that I'm |
|
unopposed to having, but one-size-does-not-fit-all. |
|
The second bucket--let's go back--the easier-to-stay-closed |
|
bucket. You have State and local bailouts. Any money spent with |
|
State and local governments should be focused on reopening the |
|
economy safely and quickly. Bailing out unfunded pension |
|
liabilities and poor fiscal policy for the last decade is just |
|
not an appropriate use of Federal tax dollars for COVID relief. |
|
Then, you have stimulus checks for people who make six figures |
|
or more, who have had no income disruption. That is not |
|
appropriate. And unemployment benefits that disincentivize |
|
returning to work also not helpful. |
|
We need to spend all of our time and resources on the first |
|
bucket. How do we make it easier to reopen? Vaccines are |
|
clearly the number one issue there. Anyone who wants a shot |
|
should be able to get it as quickly as possible. That will |
|
allow all of our economy to reopen, and we can get past the |
|
pandemic. Schools are another very important way. Even if we |
|
reopen the economy, if our schools are not reopened, parents |
|
are not going to be able to go to work because they have to |
|
keep the kids at home. We need to give the schools the |
|
resources necessary to reopen. That is additional PPE. That is |
|
additional testing. Whatever the schools need to reopen, that |
|
is what we need to be spending our time and resources on. |
|
Last, but certainly not least, we need to address |
|
businesses that have been disproportionately affected by COVID, |
|
and that is tourism, hotels, and restaurants. We have done |
|
that. We have already spent $3.5 trillion. We can have |
|
conversations about more, depending on how long it takes for |
|
the vaccine to be fully distributed. But we just need to spend |
|
all of our time on how we are going to make it easier to reopen |
|
the economy. We are going to have $30 trillion of debt within |
|
the next year or two, but probably in the next month or two, if |
|
this passes. |
|
The global community is not going to let us borrow $40-, |
|
$50-, or $60 trillion. The only reason we are getting away with |
|
it right now is because the dollar is the global currency and |
|
we are able to spend beyond our means, but the global community |
|
will find alternative currency eventually. And if our debt is |
|
called, if we lose the global currency, our entire economy is |
|
going to fall apart. So, again, we must reopen as safely and as |
|
quickly as possible, and that is where we should be spending |
|
our time and resources. With that, Madam Chairwoman, I yield |
|
back. |
|
Chairwoman Waters. Thank you very much. The gentlewoman |
|
from Michigan, Ms. Tlaib, is recognized for 5 minutes. |
|
Ms. Tlaib. Thank you so much, Madam Chairwoman. Look, I |
|
think the biggest job killer right now in our country and |
|
around the world is COVID, so let's just be very clear. That is |
|
the job killer in our country, and that is what we need to |
|
truly address right now, to pretend that it doesn't even exist, |
|
to talk about these different kinds of economies that are not |
|
connected to the fact that we need to protect our public |
|
health. |
|
Madam Chairwoman, I don't know if you realize this, but the |
|
United States is on a course of losing about 500,000 people. |
|
That is half a million lives lost because of the incompetence |
|
of this past Administration. Just in my home State of Michigan, |
|
we have lost nearly 16,000 of our neighbors. For comparison, in |
|
the entirety of Australia, New Zealand, Singapore, and Japan |
|
combined, there has been less than 7,000 deaths. Think about |
|
that for one moment. |
|
It did not have to be this way. The stock market might have |
|
bounced back, but everyday Americans--our neighbors, our |
|
communities, like my residents--are suffering. The measure of |
|
our nation's greatness should not be the gains of Wall Street. |
|
It should be in how our most vulnerable are taken care of. |
|
Since the beginning of the pandemic last March, we have senta |
|
$1,200 check and another $600 check, a total of $1,800 to our |
|
neighbors. That is an average of $163 per month. That is |
|
absolutely shameful. It is the reason why our food bank lines |
|
are growing longer in my district, and people are falling |
|
behind on their rent and losing their homes. |
|
I have been calling for a $2,000 recurring monthly direct |
|
payment since the start of the pandemic. And Mr. Spriggs, I |
|
want to know, if we fail to provide sufficient economic support |
|
for the most vulnerable among us in the coming months, what |
|
will be the impact on our economy and, by extension, on |
|
everyday people? |
|
Mr. Spriggs. Thank you, Congresswoman. We are in the |
|
situation we are in because of our high level of inequality. |
|
The size of these packages is an indication of what it takes to |
|
actually fill the gap because people at the bottom of our |
|
income distribution don't have enough money. We scar them and |
|
scar our economy. It will be harder to reconnect them. When we |
|
have the virus under control and employers go to meet with |
|
these workers, it will be harder to find them because they will |
|
have lost their homes. They will have lost contact with the |
|
labor market. We have to keep households engaged and as intact |
|
as possible so that when the economy does recover, people are |
|
spending their money on growth and not on paying back debts. |
|
So the importance here is keeping this growing from not |
|
just the physical, not just the mental, not just the spiritual, |
|
but you don't want economic disparity. |
|
Ms. Tlaib. Absolutely. The vaccine can't fix the problem of |
|
our savings accounts, right? It can probably keep us healthy, |
|
but, again, how does that extend to the fact that this economic |
|
downfall that is happening is going to be something that is |
|
going to be hard to address if we don't do something now? |
|
I represent the third-poorest congressional district. The |
|
majority of my neighbors were living paycheck to paycheck prior |
|
to this pandemic, so just imagine now this layer of issues. I |
|
also want to push back against the deficit hawks and |
|
Republicans who worry more about the budget than getting |
|
Americans money so that they can keep food on their table and a |
|
roof over their head. They had no issue with granting |
|
corporations and the wealthiest of Americans hundreds of |
|
billions of dollars' worth of tax cuts, yet they speak out now |
|
when we need to help everyday Americans, when this is their |
|
money that they are asking for, and they are saying, this is |
|
the time for the government to be about people and to help |
|
them. |
|
So, Dr. Spriggs, do you agree that those billions of |
|
dollars of lost tax revenue could have funded greater financial |
|
relief to our Americans right now? |
|
Mr. Strain. We saw many corporations didn't have the |
|
liquidity they should have had because after we gave the |
|
corporations the tax cut, they found themselves fragile going |
|
into this pandemic. They required government assistance as |
|
well. So those tax cuts didn't build up the reservoir that we |
|
were told would be there to make those corporations much more |
|
resilient. If those corporations with their billions weren't |
|
more resilient, then what does it say of these households |
|
living paycheck to paycheck? |
|
Ms. Tlaib. Thank you. I know my time is up. I apologize. |
|
Thank you so much. |
|
Chairwoman Waters. Thank you. The gentleman from Texas, Mr. |
|
Taylor, is recognized for 5 minutes. |
|
Mr. Taylor. Thank you, Madam Chairwoman. I appreciate being |
|
in this hearing. Mr. Anthony, I want to talk to you a little |
|
bit about municipal finance running local governments. I am |
|
very blessed to represent Collin County, Texas, and we have |
|
some very successful cities, and our County is very well-run. |
|
We have some of the safest streets, and some of the best |
|
schools. I think it is a testament to the people in our |
|
community who consistently elect competent leaders who then, in |
|
turn, run fiscally conservative cities, counties, and school |
|
districts. And as such, not only are our taxes low, but we keep |
|
decent reserves in our local governments. And so when COVID-19 |
|
came, we watched a modest drop in municipal revenues, and the |
|
CARES dollars that went to the Collin County government |
|
actually, which is Collin County has about a million, so it got |
|
us a direct CARES dollar contribution. That money was then |
|
distributed to the cities, and the cities actually went ahead |
|
and distributed that to the citizens. |
|
I have heard a lot of talk here today about rental |
|
assistance. Rental assistance actually came from the cities to |
|
the citizens, so there was no need for Federal assistance, |
|
because the cities and the counties could actually go ahead. |
|
They were in good fiscal shape, well-run physically. They could |
|
actually go ahead and help their citizens. And I remember |
|
visiting the Allen Area Food Bank, which is a food pantry in |
|
Allen, Texas, and they had gotten a $10 million grant from |
|
Collin County. The county government gives them $10 million to |
|
help feed people, but that was possible because the county was |
|
well-run. It had the resources. It had gas in the tank. |
|
And so as we talk about more CARES dollars going to cities, |
|
what I am kind of concerned about is that my cities and my |
|
county have been well-run, and I am worried that you are |
|
talking about taking money from my voters and giving it to |
|
other places that were not well-run, because those are the ones |
|
where taxes were high, and so they are more likely to have |
|
revenues drop off very quickly, and where they didn't have |
|
money in the bank and they were unable to handle the problem in |
|
front of them. So, how should we think about this to be sure |
|
that we are fair to people who did a good job, who had money in |
|
the bank, who were well-run, Mr. Anthony? How should we think |
|
about this problem? |
|
Mr. Anthony. Yes, thank you, Congressman Taylor, for that |
|
question. I think I will start from a place of assumption that |
|
municipal leaders are responsible, that they, in fact, have to |
|
balance their budget based upon the tax base that they have. |
|
And perhaps in your county, region, it is very diverse, and |
|
perhaps the wealth of that county may be a little different |
|
than some other counties and cities. So my assumption is that, |
|
again, local governments do manage their budgets. |
|
The other thing I will say is that your description of how |
|
the CARES Act dollars came into the State, into the county, and |
|
then, in fact, were shared with the city is a story that we |
|
want to happen all over America, but it has not happened that |
|
way all over America. And the fact that your county was able to |
|
get the CARES Act dollars and then provide them to the |
|
nonprofits is the way we want it to happen. The thing that we |
|
want to stop is having to argue with counties and States to get |
|
the money. We think that your mayors in your county, in your |
|
district, should get direct dollars. So, I commend your county |
|
leaders and say that all of our leaders attempt to be good |
|
stewards of dollars. |
|
Mr. Taylor. Thank you. I appreciate that. Obviously, I feel |
|
very fortunate. |
|
Mr. Anthony. Yes. |
|
Mr. Taylor. And I am very proud of the leaders in my |
|
community, and it is a team effort to build Collin County into |
|
a really, really terrific county, and it has been humbling, to |
|
say the least, to watch the struggles. And they are very real, |
|
very personal struggles that individuals in my county have |
|
confronted, like the single working mom who just lost her job |
|
and is trying to find toilet paper, and getting that phone |
|
call. It is very hard, very humbling calls that we have had as |
|
leaders, but I am proud of what we have been able to do to step |
|
up, and I appreciate your thoughts on this subject. And I yield |
|
back. |
|
Mr. Anthony. And I am proud of you as well. |
|
Mr. Taylor. Thank you. |
|
Chairwoman Waters. Thank you. The gentlewoman from North |
|
Carolina, Ms. Adams, is recognized for 5 minutes. |
|
Ms. Adams. Thank you, Madam Chairwoman. Thank you for |
|
convening this hearing today. And to our witnesses, I want to |
|
thank you as well for sharing your perspectives. Mr. Anthony, |
|
let me take a moment to ask you some questions about housing |
|
insecurity, which has been worsened by this pandemic. According |
|
to the Census household post-survey, we know that of an |
|
estimated of 15.1 million adults living in rental housing, 1 in |
|
5 adult renters are not caught up on their rent, according to |
|
the data collected in January. But let me just skip over and |
|
talk about a little problem that is going on in my district. |
|
In Charlotte-Mecklenburg, we are seeing the impacts of the |
|
pandemic-fueled housing insecurity. In fact, it has played out |
|
before our very eyes. We have a large and growing homelessness |
|
situation. Our community calls that largest settlement the Tent |
|
City. Tragically, each and every day, more and more tents join |
|
that community. These people are actually living on the street, |
|
because the pandemic does not allow the social distancing in |
|
these centers. They have needs that vary from basic healthcare, |
|
to mental health services, job training, hunger, clothing, et |
|
cetera. So in addition to the recent $25 billion in emergency |
|
rental assistance, what more should Congress do to provide the |
|
funding solutions and support to our cities and counties in |
|
addressing the ever-growing homeless problem, and does the |
|
pandemic give us an opportunity to tap into new and innovative |
|
solutions? |
|
Mr. Anthony. Thank you, Congresswoman Adams. I know your |
|
mayor, Mayor Vi Lyles, and I have worked with the county as |
|
well to address the issues and questions about housing |
|
instability. And we all know that having a roof over your head |
|
is one of the things that creates a feeling of safety, a |
|
quality of health, and wealth. And what we are seeing and |
|
hoping is that there could be dollars in the rental assistance |
|
and housing stability programs to help residents to get a roof |
|
over their head and to get some security. So what we would want |
|
is some dollars, again, going directly to those counties and |
|
cities, who can actually create programs and partnerships with |
|
neighborhood associations. |
|
Ms. Adams. Thank you for that, for your comments. Mr. |
|
Johnson, when Congress created the Paycheck Protection Program |
|
in the CARES Act, we found through various studies, |
|
particularly by the Brookings Institution, that businesses in |
|
majority Black neighborhoods received PPP loans less |
|
frequently, they waited longer for their loans, and they were |
|
more likely to apply through fintechs or online lending |
|
platforms, which frequently carry less favorable interest |
|
terms. So, how can we ensure that minority communities have |
|
adequate and equitable access to programs like PPP, and that |
|
they are not victims of disparate treatment by financial |
|
institutions in carrying out these programs? |
|
Mr. Johnson. Thank you, Congresswoman. First, with the |
|
current consideration, there is a requirement for small |
|
business owners, if they want to go in for a second PPP, they |
|
have to demonstrate that they had a loss of up upwards of 25 |
|
percent in one quarter of last year. For many small businesses, |
|
particularly for African-American businesses, if they had a 25 |
|
percent loss last year, they are no longer in business, so that |
|
should be addressed in this upcoming bill. |
|
Second, you have to ensure that the lending institutions |
|
that are closer to those businesses have access and preference |
|
for those small businesses, whether it is CDFIs, local credit |
|
unions, and others, that are closer to the ground, and |
|
particularly Black banks, because many of those institutions |
|
are the lenders for African-American small businesses. |
|
Ms. Adams. Thank you for that. I just want to add one |
|
thing. As I talk to some of the banks and some of the |
|
individuals who were trying to get these loans, many of the |
|
banks are just now providing information to their customers, |
|
and some of these are small businesses that were unbanked and |
|
so forth. So that continues, I guess, to be a problem. |
|
Hopefully, we can figure that out, but thank you very much. |
|
Madam Chairwoman, I yield back. |
|
Chairwoman Waters. Thank you very much. The gentleman from |
|
New York, Mr. Zeldin, is recognized for 5 minutes. And I am |
|
going to turn the gavel over to Mr. Perlmutter, as I must leave |
|
to attend to other business at this point. Thank you all very |
|
much. |
|
Mr. Zeldin. Thank you, Madam Chairwoman. Thank you to the |
|
witnesses for being here today. Thank you to Ranking Member |
|
McHenry as well. I represent the 1st Congressional District of |
|
New York, which is located on the east end of Long Island in |
|
Suffolk County. Long Island was hit very hard by COVID-19 from |
|
the earliest stages of the outbreak here in our country, and |
|
the local governments in my district all stepped up to the |
|
plate in a very big way to provide critical services when my |
|
constituents needed it most. In light of historic shortfalls |
|
caused by this ongoing outbreak, our local governments have |
|
been struggling to recover fiscally. Additional relief from |
|
Congress is likely coming, but it cannot be an across-the-board |
|
free-for-all. Additionally, the State and local government |
|
relief being discussed should not be a bailout of budgeting |
|
failures unrelated to the pandemic. |
|
Democratic leadership has decided to try to push forward a |
|
$1.9 trillion COVID-19 relief package through the budget |
|
reconciliation process, ignoring that the Federal Government |
|
just passed another massive coronavirus recovery bill just a |
|
few weeks ago. Our country cannot afford a partisan approach to |
|
COVID-19 relief, like the Democrat-flawed HEROES Act from last |
|
Congress. We must target our relief to where it can pack the |
|
greatest punch. Congress provided support for State and local |
|
governments in the CARES Act, but limited it to support for |
|
local governments with more than 500,000 in population. |
|
I did not agree with that population limit, which is why I |
|
have worked across the aisle with my New York colleague, |
|
Congressman Antonio Delgado, to reintroduce H.R. 199, the |
|
Direct Support for Communities Act. This would drive support to |
|
the most local levels of our counties, towns, cities, and |
|
villages without that population threshold, and driving it to |
|
those who desperately need the assistance. |
|
Dr. Strain, in a recent AEI blog posted on January 26th, |
|
you stated, ``The best thing that Biden is proposing is the |
|
Federal grants to State and local governments, which are |
|
providers of essential services and major employers. The |
|
decrease in tax revenue caused by the pandemic left these |
|
governments with no choice but to lay off workers, especially |
|
since Congress failed to provide funding for States and |
|
localities in the previous relief packages.'' It is clear that |
|
the fiscal solvency of all levels of government is important |
|
for economic recovery. Can you elaborate on the importance of |
|
the health of all levels of government as we talk about the |
|
health and growth of the overall U.S. economy? |
|
Mr. Strain. Yes, Congressman. Thank you for the question. |
|
Right now, State and local unemployment levels are about 1.4 |
|
million below where they were prior to the pandemic, so there |
|
are about 1.4 million fewer jobs in State and local governments |
|
than there were in February of 2020. That includes about |
|
600,000 fewer education sector workers. And so, if we want the |
|
overall economy to recover, if we want the national labor |
|
market to heal, and if we want there to be enough personnel in |
|
schools for schools to reopen, I think it really is critical |
|
that Congress replace the pandemic-related revenue losses that |
|
have been experienced by States and localities, if for no other |
|
reason than to support the national economic recovery. |
|
Mr. Zeldin. Yes. I am a member who supports additional |
|
funding for State and local governments, but I would not want |
|
it to be a one-size-fits-all approach. I would not want us to |
|
be inefficient with it. I believe that it is important, as |
|
stewards of tax dollars, to ensure that it is not just going to |
|
State governments or the largest cities, but it is going to |
|
some of the local governments that have been on the front lines |
|
of responding to this pandemic. I had towns that had balanced |
|
budgets. They had AAA bond ratings. They were doing a really |
|
good job with their finances, and then they got hit hard by |
|
this pandemic. |
|
In New York State, we have unique issues where the State |
|
had a deficit before we got hit, and it was exacerbated. New |
|
York City has financial issues, correct, but it got exacerbated |
|
by this pandemic. Plus, it is also important that our nation's |
|
largest mass transit system, the MTA, as well as the Port |
|
Authority and some of these others are being heard and that we |
|
are being responsive, but have to be smart in how we do it. |
|
That is extremely important, and that is our responsibility, |
|
working together on both sides of the aisle. I yield back. |
|
Mr. Perlmutter. [presiding]. The gentleman yields back. |
|
Another gentleman from New York, Mr. Torres, is recognized for |
|
5 minutes. |
|
Mr. Torres. Thank you. We often speak of a single American |
|
economy, but in truth, there is no single economy in America. |
|
The economic reality for Americans varies widely depending on |
|
your ZIP Code, and often depending on the color of your skin. |
|
Take, as an example, New York City. In the South Bronx and West |
|
Farms, the unemployment rate is 25 percent, which is |
|
Depression-level unemployment. Right across the river in the |
|
Upper East Side, the unemployment rate is 5 percent. New York |
|
City, much like America itself, is a tale of two economies. And |
|
so my first question is, what are your thoughts on how to best |
|
confront the crisis of Depression-level unemployment in |
|
communities of color in places like the South Bronx? And I will |
|
start with Mr. Spriggs. |
|
Mr. Spriggs. Thank you for the question, Congressman. It is |
|
to recognize these disparities. When you hear folks say that, |
|
oh, if you add more money to unemployment benefits, then this |
|
would discourage work. It doesn't discourage those workers who |
|
live in the South Bronx. They are living in absolute fear |
|
because they don't know when they will get their next job. |
|
Their data are clear. They will suffer long-term unemployment. |
|
They may well run out of unemployment benefits. So if you |
|
design unemployment and ignore these realities, if you ignore |
|
the reality that those workers have no savings, they truly live |
|
paycheck to paycheck, and missing one paycheck means they are |
|
in debt, this $600, $400, whatever we add to the unemployment |
|
check, is vital for them. |
|
So it is important that we not model on who is not |
|
unemployed, and understand in this downturn specifically, it is |
|
a clear set of workers who are unemployed, who have severe |
|
challenges. And we can't legislate based on somebody's notion |
|
of what those workers look like. When we added the extra money |
|
to the unemployment check, everybody howled that workers |
|
wouldn't return to work. The evidence was absolutely clear. |
|
Workers returned to work. That was not a discouragement for |
|
people to get back to work, because real people who live in |
|
those communities know you need a job. An unemployment check is |
|
not a job, and in the face of this downturn, it is not a |
|
discouragement for them. |
|
Mr. Torres. I have a question about State and local aid. |
|
State and local governments, largely through no fault of their |
|
own, have seen a catastrophic loss of revenue caused by an |
|
economic crisis the likes of which we have not seen in a |
|
century. New York City has a $4 billion deficit over the next |
|
year. New York State has a cumulative deficit of $60 billion |
|
dollars over the next 4 years. State and local aid matters not |
|
only to State and local governments; it matters to the larger |
|
ecosystem of community-based organizations that depend on the |
|
stability of local and State government. These are community- |
|
based organizations that often heavily employ people of color, |
|
and heavily serve communities of color. |
|
One example that comes to mind in my district is Acacia |
|
Network, which employs thousands of people. More than 85 |
|
percent of its essential workforce are people of color who |
|
depend heavily on local and State aid. So when it comes to |
|
local and State aid, can you share with the committee your |
|
thoughts on what is at stake for communities of color and the |
|
ecosystem that heavily serves and employs them? And this |
|
question is for Mr. Anthony, Mr. Johnson, and Ms. Murguia. |
|
Ms. Murguia. I would be happy to take the first stab at |
|
that. Thank you, Congressman. It is a great question. We have |
|
been talking about how there is an ecosystem at the State and |
|
local level, particularly at the local level, and, yes, it is |
|
State and local governments. But it is these community-based |
|
nonprofits that are the lifeline, the safety nets, for so many |
|
in our communities. These affiliate clients are low income, |
|
mostly now ravaged by the hospitality industry layoffs. They |
|
are the essential workers that we are trying to make sure we |
|
can get assistance to. |
|
But when you see funding cuts for these nonprofits, you see |
|
their safety nets shut down. These affiliates are there to |
|
provide much-needed resources, oftentimes setting up food |
|
pantries and direct assistance, and information. And these are |
|
trusted partners in those communities, so getting that |
|
information, whether it is about vaccines, or economic |
|
assistance, or, again, food, they are a lifeline. They are a |
|
safety net, and we need to make sure that we are supporting |
|
State and local governments, but also, and in addition to, |
|
these community-based organizations. I'm proud of Acacia, which |
|
is a UnidosUS affiliate as well. Thank you. |
|
Mr. Anthony. Congressman, I will add on behalf of cities |
|
all over America, that we know that if there is stress on local |
|
government in the ability to provide support for the nonprofit |
|
community, we know that the communities of color will suffer |
|
first. |
|
Mr. Perlmutter. And, Mr. Anthony, I don't mean to cut you |
|
off, but the gentleman's time has expired, and it has been a |
|
very long hearing for all of the witnesses, that is for sure. |
|
So, Mr. Torres, thank you for your questions. I am going to |
|
recognize Ms. Williams from Georgia for 5 minutes. |
|
Ms. Williams of Georgia. Thank you, Mr. Chairman, for |
|
convening this hearing on the critical need for additional |
|
funding to assist our families and communities that have been |
|
impacted by COVID-19. Our constituents are suffering, and are |
|
in desperate need of assistance from the Federal Government. My |
|
colleagues across the aisle keep expressing their outrage at |
|
the fact that we are spending necessary dollars to help |
|
families impacted by a deadly pandemic, but were silent on the |
|
$1.9 trillion tax scam that benefited the wealthiest in the |
|
country. |
|
My question is for you, Dr. Spriggs. In your testimony, you |
|
stated that there is a misguided belief that simply reopening |
|
businesses will solve the current unemployment crisis. What |
|
will it take to actually help the economy recover and ensure |
|
that long-term unemployment is resolved? |
|
Mr. Spriggs. Thank you, Congresswoman. The data is clear |
|
because we have a huge variation in levels of shutdown, what |
|
has been shut down, and it is clear from the economic evidence |
|
that it is not these orders. It is the disease. People are |
|
responding to the risk, and they aren't going out because of |
|
the risk, and it is hurting the businesses because of that. So |
|
the real issue is, can we solve the disease? Can we get it |
|
under control? Can we throw everything at it that we possibly |
|
can? Simply reopening is not going to get people on airplanes. |
|
It is not going to get them into a theater. It is not going get |
|
them to a live music venue. It is not going to get them flying |
|
to Disney. |
|
Ms. Williams of Georgia. Thank you, Dr. Spriggs. Like my |
|
colleagues, I also want to have people get back to work, and I |
|
want our economy to recover and work for the people. So, Dr. |
|
Spriggs, could you tell us, in your opinion, what happens if we |
|
reopen too soon or have a patchwork of States reopening and do |
|
not have a coordinated reopening? |
|
Mr. Spriggs. My fear is that too often, that will be |
|
accompanied by lowering our barriers on the safety issues, and |
|
we would reignite the disease. We were warned of that going |
|
into this fall. People ignored it, and now we have the disease |
|
on a path we are so uncertain of. We are hopeful that it has |
|
peaked, but it has peaked now with variants that are even more |
|
dangerous, so we can't take our eye off the ball. We must |
|
concentrate on safety first. |
|
Ms. Williams of Georgia. As we have heard, communities are |
|
still being ravaged by the pandemic. Millions of workers are |
|
struggling to find work, and countless families are facing a |
|
looming eviction crisis. There is currently an eviction |
|
moratorium in place by the CDC halting evictions through March |
|
31st. However, we know that several States, including my home |
|
State of Georgia, have been continuing with the eviction |
|
proceedings for months. Mr. Anthony, as we work to pass the |
|
necessary proposals in President Biden's rescue plan to assist |
|
families, how can we ensure that CDC eviction moratoriums are |
|
being enforced? |
|
Mr. Anthony. Congresswoman Williams, thank you for that |
|
question. I think what we need to do is to have our local |
|
leaders, our mayors and our council members work with the local |
|
legal center to make sure that the rights of those people are |
|
not taken for granted. And I think that local leaders are |
|
committed to that by the programs that they have created, and |
|
the mayors, again, in your region are models for that. Atlanta |
|
and other mayors are doing an amazing job in trying to make |
|
sure that evictions do not occur without some place for people |
|
to live. |
|
Ms. Williams of Georgia. Thank you, Mr. Anthony. As we work |
|
towards slowing the spread of COVID-19 and ensuring that the |
|
majority of the country is vaccinated, we must continue to |
|
provide emergency funding to help families and communities |
|
recover. Thank you, Mr. Chairman, and I yield back the balance |
|
of my time. |
|
Mr. Perlmutter. Thank you. The gentlelady yields back her |
|
time. The gentleman from Illinois, Mr. Garcia, is recognized |
|
for 5 minutes. |
|
Mr. Garcia of Illinois. Thank you, Mr. Chairman, and all of |
|
the witnesses, and I want to thank Chairwoman Waters and the |
|
ranking member for holding this hearing. This Congress has to |
|
deliver more relief, and we have to do it fast. And I applaud |
|
our witnesses for joining us today to talk about how our |
|
communities across the country are experiencing this pandemic. |
|
I would like to ask Ms. Murguia a question regarding |
|
housing. I thank you for joining us today. As you know, I |
|
represent a working-class Latino district, and communities like |
|
mine have been hit especially hard. Essential workers in my |
|
neighborhood worry about getting their family sick when they |
|
come home from work. Especially in times like this when money |
|
is tight, intergenerational living puts entire families at |
|
risk. And a report came out last month saying that one-quarter |
|
of Latinos in Illinois think they will miss their rent payment. |
|
Families are worried about losing their homes. Can you talk a |
|
little bit about why it is so important to keep families in |
|
their homes, and tools like rental assistance and counseling |
|
that can help do that? |
|
Ms. Murguia. Yes. Thank you, Congressman. Thanks for your |
|
leadership on so many issues, but particularly this one. I know |
|
we have worked on the impact of systemic inequalities and how |
|
that has impacted communities of color in terms of our Latino |
|
community, and we are seeing that in healthcare, but of course |
|
now economically through the pandemic, and in housing in |
|
particular, and it has been devastating. Our Latino workers are |
|
the essential workers, and they are being crushed right now by |
|
this pandemic. |
|
And I would just say it is absolutely essential for us to |
|
up the housing counseling assistance funding right now. The |
|
Housing Counseling Program gives that early intervention that |
|
really does empower renters and homeowners to stay in their |
|
homes, and this support is also accessible to mixed-status |
|
families who have been cruelly left out of Federal assistance. |
|
So we do know that there is a high success rate as well. In |
|
terms of when families and individuals are able to get that |
|
counseling, it is 3 times more likely to allow them to stay in |
|
their homes. So we do understand that that helps us prevent |
|
homelessness and eviction by helping these renters locate |
|
secure and retain affordable rental housing or stay in their |
|
homes. |
|
So, housing counseling improves outcomes, and that helps |
|
create stability for these families, and in our economy, so it |
|
is very important. And what we have found, and as you know, in |
|
Illinois, Unidos affiliates, like the Resurrection Project, |
|
have the trust of communities. They have the cultural |
|
competency and are able to provide the linguistic support to be |
|
able to effectively connect with these families. That is going |
|
to be true for housing. It is also going to be true for |
|
vaccines, which we know have to be more equitable in terms of |
|
their distribution, and to gain the confidence for our |
|
community to do that. |
|
So, across-the-board, we know that this nonprofit network, |
|
the community-based networks, become key. UnidosUS has the |
|
largest Latino housing counseling network in the country, and |
|
it has proven to be very effective, but we need to grow that |
|
footprint and its impact with more funding. Thank you, |
|
Congressman, for your leadership. |
|
Mr. Garcia of Illinois. Thank you, Ms. Murguia, and as a |
|
former housing counselor, I couldn't agree with you more. On |
|
the special drawing rights, I would like to ask Dr. Spriggs, |
|
whether it is the virus or the economy? We talk a lot about how |
|
we are all in this together, but if we don't keep people safe, |
|
we will keep spreading the virus, and if we don't get money |
|
into people's pockets, we won't see economic growth. |
|
But that is true on a global scale, too. Like many others |
|
in my neighborhood, I moved to this country from Mexico. It |
|
matters to me and my community that Mexico is able to fight the |
|
virus effectively, and, of course, it matters to us here in the |
|
U.S., and that the global economy recovers. The AFL-CIO is a |
|
major proponent of the International Monetary Fund (IMF) |
|
issuing special drawing rights. Could you talk a little bit |
|
about what those are and why a large issuance is so important? |
|
You have about 33 seconds. |
|
Mr. Spriggs. Thank you so much for the question and for |
|
your leadership on banking issues. Yes, it is vital that |
|
governments not face fiscal constraints when it comes to them |
|
responding on the global scale, and that is why we want these |
|
special drawing rights. It is not a time right now for finger |
|
pointing and arguing about which countries we think were |
|
profligate or anything like that. It is time to let them be |
|
unfettered in responding, and we don't want them to go into |
|
early austerity. You don't want them to start cutting their |
|
budgets and cutting their services because that will hurt the |
|
rate of recovery for the global economy. And they are all going |
|
to turn to wanting to export to the United States as their |
|
number-one answer if we force them into austerity. |
|
Mr. Perlmutter. Thank you. Thank you, Dr. Spriggs. The |
|
gentleman's time has expired, and now we will recognize Mr. |
|
Auchincloss from Massachusetts for 5 minutes. |
|
Mr. Auchincloss. Thank you, and thank you all for being |
|
here. Our nation's response to this pandemic has revealed |
|
significant gaps in our domestic ability to rapidly deploy key |
|
medical equipment and supplies in the face of ever-changing |
|
requirements. The Biden Administration has taken action since |
|
day one to accelerate vaccine deployment, in part by invoking |
|
the Defense Production Act (DPA), but the reality is that it |
|
will be a while before we have the supply to meet the need. In |
|
Massachusetts, we have the personnel and equipment needed to |
|
distribute vaccines. We just don't have the vaccines themselves |
|
in sufficient supply. |
|
My question is for Mr. Anthony. We know that the Defense |
|
Production Act could be invoked to provide PPE, like N95 masks, |
|
gloves, and gowns. These are in short supply, and we must ramp |
|
up their production for States and local governments. As we |
|
begin to implement our mass vaccination campaign, it appears |
|
that the supply of the vaccine components will be the limiting |
|
factor. How can the DPA be used to address this bottleneck for |
|
States and local governments? How can we use the DPA to |
|
actually expand the supply of vaccinations themselves? |
|
Mr. Anthony. I think that one of the things that most |
|
citizens have an assumption on, Congressman, is that most |
|
cities have access to the distribution and supply of vaccines, |
|
and, in fact, probably 90 percent of cities do not. It is a |
|
State- and county-level process. What we are hoping is that you |
|
will partner with those cities, those neighborhoods, those |
|
churches, and those places in the community so that we can get |
|
the vaccine in the arms of people very quickly, especially |
|
people of color. |
|
In my State of Florida, where I grew up, they are, in fact, |
|
using one of the high-class, I would say, grocery store chains |
|
to get access, and it is not working because those citizens |
|
don't have access. So, local government is the answer. |
|
Mr. Auchincloss. Thank you, Mr. Anthony. I will yield back |
|
my time. |
|
Mr. Perlmutter. The gentleman yields back. Thank you, Mr. |
|
Auchincloss, and I don't think we have any more Members. To our |
|
panelists who have shown incredible stamina, thank you all very |
|
much. I would like to thank you all for your testimony today. |
|
The Chair notes that some Members may have additional |
|
questions for this panel, which they may wish to submit in |
|
writing. Without objection, the hearing record will remain open |
|
for 5 legislative days for Members to submit written questions |
|
to these witnesses and to place their responses in the record. |
|
Also, without objection, Members will have 5 legislative days |
|
to submit extraneous materials to the Chair for inclusion in |
|
the record. |
|
Again, thank you all very much for your diligence, your |
|
stamina, and your testimony today. And with that, this hearing |
|
is adjourned. |
|
Mr. Anthony. Thank you, Mr. Chairman. |
|
Mr. Perlmutter. Everybody have a good day. |
|
Mr. Johnson. Thank you. Have a nice day. |
|
Mr. Perlmutter. You, as well. |
|
Ms. Murguia. Thank you. |
|
[Whereupon, at 2:19 p.m., the hearing was adjourned.] |
|
|
|
|
|
APPENDIX |
|
|
|
February 4, 2021 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
[GRAPHIC(S) NOT AVAILABLE IN TIFF FORMAT] |
|
|
|
|
|
[all] |
|
</pre></body></html> |
|
|