|
<html> |
|
<title> - FULL COMMITTEE MARKUP</title> |
|
<body><pre> |
|
[House Hearing, 118 Congress] |
|
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FULL COMMITTEE MARKUP |
|
|
|
======================================================================= |
|
|
|
MARKUP |
|
|
|
BEFORE THE |
|
|
|
COMMITTEE ON FOREIGN AFFAIRS |
|
HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES |
|
|
|
ONE HUNDRED EIGHTEENTH CONGRESS |
|
|
|
FIRST SESSION |
|
|
|
__________ |
|
|
|
March 28, 2023 |
|
|
|
__________ |
|
|
|
Serial No. 118-10 |
|
|
|
__________ |
|
|
|
Printed for the use of the Committee on Foreign Affairs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
[GRAPHIC(S) NOT AVAILABLE IN TIFF FORMAT] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Available: http://www.foreignaffairs.house.gov/, http:// |
|
docs.house.gov, |
|
or http://www.govinfo.gov |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
_________ |
|
|
|
U.S. GOVERNMENT PUBLISHING OFFICE |
|
|
|
51-597 PDF WASHINGTON : 2023 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
COMMITTEE ON FOREIGN AFFAIRS |
|
|
|
MICHAEL T. MCCAUL, Texas, Chairman |
|
|
|
CHRISTOPHER H. SMITH, New Jersey GREGORY MEEKS, New Yok, Ranking |
|
JOE WILSON, South Carolina Member |
|
SCOTT PERRY, Pennsylvania |
|
DARRELL ISSA, California |
|
ANN WAGNER, Missouri |
|
BRIAN MAST, Florida |
|
KEN BUCK, Colorado |
|
TIM BURCHETT, Tennessee |
|
MARK E. GREEN, Tennessee |
|
ANDY BARR, Kentucky |
|
RONNY JACKSON, Texas |
|
YOUNG KIM, California |
|
MARIA ELVIRA SALAZAR, Florida |
|
BILL HUIZENGA, Michigan |
|
AMATA COLEMAN-RADEWAGEN, American |
|
Samoa |
|
FRENCH HILL, Arkansas |
|
WARREN DAVIDSON, Ohio |
|
JIM BAIRD, Indiana |
|
MICHAEL WALTZ, Florida |
|
TOM KEAN, JR., New Jersey |
|
MIKE LAWLER, New York |
|
CORY MILLS, Florida |
|
RICH MCCORMICK, Georgia |
|
NATHANIEL MORAN, Texas |
|
JOHN JAMES, Michigan |
|
KEITH SELF, Texas |
|
|
|
BRAD SHERMAN, California |
|
GERALD E. CONNOLLY, Virginia |
|
WILLIAM KEATING, Massachusetts |
|
DAVID CICILLINE, Rhode Island |
|
AMI BERA, California |
|
JOAQUIN CASTRO, Texas |
|
DINA TITUS, Nevada |
|
TED LIEU, California |
|
SUSAN WILD, Pennsylvania |
|
DEAN PHILLIPS, Minnesota |
|
COLIN ALLRED, Texas |
|
ANDY KIM, New Jersey |
|
SARA JACOBS, California |
|
KATHY MANNING, North Carolina |
|
SHEILA CHERFILUS-MCCORMICK, |
|
Florida |
|
GREG STANTON, Arizona |
|
MADELEINE DEAN, Pennsylvania |
|
JARED MOSKOWITZ, Florida |
|
JONATHAN JACOBS, Illinois |
|
SYDNEY KAMLAGER-DOVE, California |
|
JIM COSTA, California |
|
JASON CROW, Colorado |
|
BRAD SCHNEIDER. Illinois |
|
|
|
Brendan Shields, Staff Director |
|
|
|
Sophia Lafargue, Staff Director |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
C O N T E N T S |
|
|
|
---------- |
|
Page |
|
|
|
BILLS, AMENDMENTS EN BLOC |
|
|
|
H.R. 314......................................................... 2 |
|
Amendment to H.R. 314 offered by Mr. Meeks....................... 16 |
|
Amendment to H.R. 314 offered by Ms. Kamlager-Dove............... 19 |
|
Amendment to H.R. 314 offered by Mr. Jackson..................... 23 |
|
H.R. 1684........................................................ 26 |
|
|
|
APPENDIX |
|
|
|
Hearing Notice................................................... 54 |
|
Hearing Attendance............................................... 56 |
|
Hearing Minutes.................................................. 57 |
|
|
|
VOTES |
|
|
|
Votes submitted for the record................................... 58 |
|
|
|
STATEMENT SUBMITTED FOR THE RECORD FROM REPRESENTATIVE CONNOLLY |
|
|
|
Statement submitted for the record from Representative Connolly.. 62 |
|
|
|
MARKUP SUMMARY |
|
|
|
Markup summary................................................... 64 |
|
|
|
|
|
FULL COMMITTEE MARKUP |
|
|
|
Tuesday, March 28, 2023 |
|
|
|
House of Representatives, |
|
Committee on Foreign Affairs, |
|
Washington, DC. |
|
|
|
The committee met, pursuant to notice, at 10:10 a.m., in |
|
room 210, House Visitor Center, Hon. Michael McCaul (chairman |
|
of the committee) presiding. |
|
Chairman McCaul. A quorum being present, the Committee on |
|
Foreign Affairs will come to order. The committee is meeting |
|
today for consideration of H.R. 314, the Fighting Oppression |
|
Until the Reign of Castro Ends Act; and H.R. 1684, the Haiti |
|
Criminal Collusion Transparency Act of 2023. |
|
The chair announces that any requests for recorded votes |
|
may be rolled and he may recess the committee at any point, |
|
without objection, so ordered. |
|
Pursuant to House rules, I request that members have the |
|
opportunity to submit views for any committee report that may |
|
be produced on any of today's measures. Without objection, so |
|
ordered. |
|
Pursuant to notice, I now call H.R. 314, the Fighting |
|
Oppression Until the Reign of Castro Ends Act. The bill was |
|
circulated in advance and the clerk shall designate the bill. |
|
[The Bill H.R. 314 follows:] |
|
|
|
[GRAPHIC(S) NOT AVAILABLE IN TIFF FORMAT] |
|
|
|
The Clerk. H.R. 314, to prohibit the removal of Cuba from |
|
the list of State sponsors of terrorism until Cuba satisfies |
|
certain conditions and for other purposes. |
|
Chairman McCaul. Without objection, the first reading is |
|
suspensed with and the bill is considered read and open to |
|
amendment at any point. And I will now recognize myself for a |
|
Statement on the bill. |
|
Cuba remains on the State sponsor of terrorism list because |
|
the communist regime continues to support acts of terror. In |
|
addition to harboring terrorists from Latin America, Cuba is |
|
allied with America's adversaries including Russia and China. |
|
The Cuban Government remains in lockstep with these malign |
|
actors seeking to upend the global balance of power. And Cuba |
|
continues to support Venezuela's brutal dictatorship, the very |
|
same government whose leadership is wanted in the U.S. on |
|
narcoterrorism charges. |
|
Representative Salazar's FORCE Act will prohibit the Biden |
|
administration from removing Cuba from the SSOT list until they |
|
meet a basic set of requirements. These are the same |
|
requirements that a bipartisan majority in Congress and |
|
President Bill Clinton agreed were necessary for lifting the |
|
U.S. embargo on Cuba's regime, that is, legalizing political |
|
parties, labor unions, and free political prisons, committing |
|
to holding free and fair elections. |
|
President Biden caved to the Cuban regime's request for |
|
U.S. foreign assistance, permitting the regime to re-allocate |
|
funds toward its oppressive institutions. We cannot allow the |
|
Biden administration to continue to project weakness on the |
|
global stage by providing relief for the communist regime in |
|
Havana. |
|
I was in Miami. I have been there many times. I met first |
|
hand with victims of the Castro regime and I know many Cuban |
|
exiles who long to return to their home that was stolen from |
|
them. It is time to stop rewarding the Western Hemisphere's |
|
longest-ruling communist dictatorship. I am proud to support |
|
this critical piece of legislation and I commend my friend and |
|
colleague, Representative Salazar, for her tireless efforts on |
|
behalf of the Cuban people. |
|
Is there any further discussion on the bill? |
|
Mr. Meeks is recognized. |
|
Mr. Meeks. Thank you, Mr. Chairman. Let me say I oppose |
|
this bill. And while I appreciate the sponsor's passion on |
|
these issues and in fact, share her goals for a more free, |
|
prosperous, and democratic Cuba, I break with her on the best |
|
way to bring about these changes. |
|
My views on U.S. engagement with Cuba are clear. I have |
|
been against policies which seek to further isolate and |
|
alienate the people of Cuba and I have seen the impact of what |
|
establishing relationships with the people of Cuba can do in |
|
just a short time. |
|
During the Obama Administration, the warming relations with |
|
Cuba inspired Cuban people to build private businesses, explore |
|
new opportunities, and organizing using social media and their |
|
own voices to do so. As an added benefit, engagement also |
|
strengthened the United States' credibility in the entire |
|
region. |
|
I oppose this bill on a number of other grounds. Most |
|
importantly, I believe it would deepen the wedge between the |
|
people of Cuba and the people of the United States on issues of |
|
mutual and global concern. |
|
Our partners in the region are also focused on these issues |
|
such as access to humanitarian support in times of crises, |
|
economic development, and the ability to recover from crises |
|
especially in the wake of COVID-19 pandemic and the barrage of |
|
natural disasters which have caused the people of Cuba great |
|
hardship in recent months. |
|
I also oppose this bill because intelligence reviews have |
|
found no, and I repeat, no indication that the Cuban Government |
|
provided weapons or paramilitary training to terrorist groups, |
|
contrary to what some believe. Failing to be a democracy is not |
|
criteria for remaining on the list. It is not a democracy, but |
|
that does not mean that it is a terrorist country. |
|
Cuba was put back on the list by the Trump administration |
|
to intentionally complicate the United States and Cuba |
|
relations. This State Department's findings on Cuba in its |
|
annual report to Congress have failed to meet the standard for |
|
designation as a State-sponsor of terror. The country simply |
|
does not meet the definition of State sponsor of terrorism, so |
|
putting Cuba on the list with North Korea, Iran, and Syria |
|
weakens the impact of what the list is intended to do and that |
|
is to thwart the activities of those who have repeatedly |
|
provided support for acts of international terrorism. |
|
There are many countries around the world that fall short |
|
of the democratic and human rights requirements imposed by this |
|
legislation for Cuba to escape the State sponsor of terrorism |
|
list. But we do not place them on the State sponsor of |
|
terrorism list for these shortcomings. There are many other |
|
tools in our foreign policy tool kit to demonstrate our |
|
disapproval including assistance cutoffs, travel restrictions, |
|
trade controls, financial sanctions. We do not need to impose |
|
an inaccurate terror designation to signal our disapproval. |
|
Now if we are serious about supporting the Cuban people and |
|
Cuba's aspiring entrepreneurs and facilitating the flow of |
|
information and communication, we need to remove barriers to |
|
engagement. The State sponsor of terrorism designation for Cuba |
|
impacts us all. Whether direct or indirect, it gets in the way |
|
of the type of change we all want to see happen on the island, |
|
while also diminishing hope for a better day. |
|
Open relationships are a more powerful change agent than |
|
isolation. How do we know? We have isolated Cuba for over 60 |
|
years and nothing has changed. We saw the biggest change when |
|
we tried to improve the relations which gave that |
|
communications that were important, what we saw taking the |
|
Cuban people to the streets. It is time for a more carrots- |
|
based approach to the challenges being faced on the island. We |
|
know the incentive can work. |
|
Unfortunately, the Cuban people have bore the brunt when |
|
U.S. policy uses its sticks-only approach. Removing Cuba from |
|
the list and resuming normalized relations which we have |
|
already seen, had and would improve the atmosphere for |
|
bilateral and multilateral dialog on a wide range of issues of |
|
mutual interest. And with that, I yield back the balance of my |
|
time. |
|
Chairman McCaul. The gentleman yields. Any further |
|
discussion on the bill? The author of the bill, Ms. Salazar, is |
|
recognized. |
|
Ms. Salazar. Thank you, Mr. Chairman, and thank you--very |
|
brave on your part to having brought this bill to be considered |
|
in front of the committee, so that is why I am proud this |
|
committee is considering H.R. 314, the FORCE Act, a bill I |
|
introduced to keep Cuba on the State sponsor of terrorism list |
|
until the Cuban regime is democratically reformed. |
|
Last week, here in this hall, I pressed Secretary Blinken |
|
to answer whether Cuba had reached the high bar, high bar that |
|
it takes to be taken off that list and he admitted clearly that |
|
it has not. So I am assuming that the Secretary of State is in |
|
full support of keeping Cuba on the list of State sponsors of |
|
terrorism. |
|
And why is that? Because him and I and the whole world |
|
knows the truth, that Cuba belongs on that list and let me |
|
explain just a few of the details why it still belongs on that |
|
list. |
|
Cuba's regime bankrolls foreign terrorist groups like the |
|
ELN in Colombia, like Maduro in Venezuela, in Bolivia, and |
|
Nicaragua, and every other dictator it could find in the |
|
hemisphere or in Africa. |
|
In 2019, this group attacked a police academy. I am talking |
|
about the ELN in Colombia. It attacked a police academy |
|
injuring 68 cadets and killing 22 others. In 2020, they carried |
|
out 76 massacres, 82 massacres the next year, and Cuba was |
|
there helping them. |
|
Just last month, it was reported that the ELN was planning |
|
more of these terror attacks. But Cuba just doesn't pay for |
|
terrorists or helps them. Cuba also hides them. Best example, |
|
the most important example is an American fugitive called |
|
Joanne Chesimard from New Jersey. She was serving time for |
|
shooting a New Jersey police officer at point blank range, |
|
execution style. But for almost 40 years, 40, she has lived |
|
peacefully in Cuba. The FBI has asked the Cuban regime, |
|
specifically, Fidel Castro, to send her back. Never. It never |
|
happened. |
|
Then we have William Morales, a bomb maker from Puerto |
|
Rico. He was implicated in over 50 bombings in the 1970's and |
|
in one of those bombings he killed 4 people and maimed another |
|
50 in the fire. When police went to arrest him, Morales said |
|
very happily, they are not going to hold me forever. And he was |
|
right. Cuba was there to welcome him with open arms and he has |
|
lived in Cuba ever since. |
|
We cannot give the Castro regime an inch and we are one bad |
|
decision away from Russia reopening the Lourdes spy base in |
|
Cuba, only 90 miles off the coast of the United States. |
|
Therefore, taking Cuba off this list would be the beginning |
|
of the end of Latin America. Our hemisphere is already poisoned |
|
by the spies in Venezuela and Bolivia. The FORCE Act will put |
|
this decision back in the hands of Congress who will ensure the |
|
LIBERTAD Act is obeyed. |
|
And just to say a few more words, when President Obama |
|
established relations with the Cuban regime, specifically with |
|
the Castro brothers, it was the perfect moment for that regime |
|
as my colleague, Congressman Meeks, just pointed out, it was |
|
the perfect moment for the Castro regime to prove to the world |
|
that they really wanted to engage in the international economic |
|
community. President Obama gave everything in exchange of |
|
nothing and 3 years later, the Cuba regime did not open up, not |
|
even one inch, what we were expecting on the economic front |
|
what Obama had expected. So it was a major disappointment for |
|
the foreign policy for the Obama Administration to have given |
|
everything in good faith and received nothing back. |
|
Thank you, Mr. Chairman, and I yield back. |
|
Chairman McCaul. The gentlelady yields. Does any other |
|
member seek recognition? |
|
Mr. Sherman is recognized. |
|
Mr. Sherman. This bill does not say that Cuba stays on the |
|
list until it stops supporting international terrorism. It says |
|
that Cuba stays on the list until it becomes a liberal |
|
democracy. That is bad anti-terrorism policy writ large and |
|
worldwide. If we turn to the world and say if you are not a |
|
liberal democracy, we are putting you on the terrorist list and |
|
we are keeping you there, then why--then a country has nothing |
|
to lose unless it has decided to become a liberal democracy and |
|
at least 100 countries haven't. So we turn to these 100 |
|
countries that we have yet to convince to adopt democracy, |
|
freedom, and liberty and say well, since you are not going to |
|
be a democracy, you are on the international terrorist list. At |
|
that point, there are no further consequences to them actually |
|
supporting international terrorism. |
|
I think we should stick with the policy that has guided us |
|
in our international terrorism policy for at least two decades, |
|
the terrorism list is for those countries that engage |
|
international terrorism on a substantial scale. Whether Cuba |
|
does or does not fit into that category is a reasonable debate |
|
and if this resolution said keep Cuba on the list until |
|
Congress determines that it is no longer engaged in |
|
international terrorism that would be a reasonable approach. |
|
But instead, it says keep Cuba on the list until it becomes a |
|
liberal democracy with full freedom. I don't think that we can |
|
have a policy of saying--once you do that, you create a |
|
precedent that logic would require you apply to the rest of the |
|
world. |
|
So the terrorism list is for terrorist States. If Cuba is a |
|
terrorist State, it should be on the list. If Cuba is no longer |
|
at some point a terrorist State, it should be off the list even |
|
if it doesn't become a democracy. That doesn't mean that we |
|
don't do many, many things to try to bring democracy to Cuba, |
|
but the terrorism list is not something that we should apply to |
|
any one of 100 countries in the world that is not a democracy, |
|
but does not support terrorism. And with that, I yield back. |
|
Chairman McCaul. The gentleman yields. Any further |
|
discussion on the bill? |
|
Mr. Perry is recognized. |
|
Mr. Perry. I thank the chairman. Wishful thinking. Wishful |
|
thinking, Mr. Chairman, members of the committee. We all wish |
|
that Cuba wouldn't do the things it does, but relaxing the |
|
standard is just going to encourage more. We have seen it. We |
|
have already seen this. We don't have to try it again to see |
|
that no good deed will go unpunished. We have tried with Cuba. |
|
So I support the gentlelady from Florida, Ms. Salazar's |
|
bill, and she has clearly articulated, if you didn't listen to |
|
her, why Cuba remains a terrorist State. She has articulated |
|
it. |
|
But included in that, even though she didn't articulate it |
|
is the fact that Cuba hosts Lourdes, the largest listening post |
|
on the planet, operated by the Communist Party of China pointed |
|
at the United States of America. And if that is not enough, co- |
|
located there is Torrens, where Moscow maintains their largest |
|
signals intelligence facility outside of their geographic |
|
bounds of their country. |
|
Cuba does not have an army that we are concerned about, but |
|
they do have a biological warfare threat that exists and is |
|
real. And I will remind everybody it is 90 miles off the coast. |
|
Cuba enables the repressive systems in Venezuela and |
|
Nicaragua. It hijacks legitimate protests in Colombia and Chile |
|
that are striving to become communist nations. |
|
Listen, folks, a block of the United Socialist Republics in |
|
our hemisphere would be completely, completely |
|
counterproductive. The soft on crime, let's all put a Che |
|
Guevara t-shirt on, and act like he was some kind of freedom- |
|
fighting hero, quite honestly is absurd and ridiculous. |
|
It would be awesome if the members of this committee could |
|
agree that Cuba does not work in the best interest of the |
|
United States. Quite honestly, it does not work in the best |
|
interest of humanity. And while we all agree, we all agree with |
|
the people of Cuba, the people of Cuba. When I was growing up |
|
in Miami, our neighbors, Cubans, where not only just our |
|
neighbors, they were close, family friends. Their freedom, |
|
their livelihood, their property, their heritage, stolen from |
|
them by Fidel Castro. That vision exists today in the |
|
leadership of Cuba and to believe anything otherwise I am not |
|
sure what that is. I am really not sure what that is. I hope it |
|
is just ignorance. |
|
We are not doing this to Cuba by the way. I have heard, oh, |
|
we have punished Cuba and we have sanctioned Cuba and this is |
|
all the United States' fault. No, this is Cuba's fault. This is |
|
the leadership of Cuba, it is not the people of Cuba, but they |
|
are never going to get out of it if we continue to help the |
|
leadership of Cuba which by the way when we send them anything, |
|
we relax anything, they use it to their benefit, not to the |
|
people of Cuba's benefit, to their benefit. |
|
Understand how totalitarian regimes work. They are not |
|
waking up in the morning and say, how can we get the United |
|
States to help us so we can help our people? They are figuring |
|
out how can they get the international community help them stay |
|
in power and oppress their people. Let's not be part of that, |
|
ladies and gentlemen. I urge you to support and vote for the |
|
bill and I yield the balance of my time to the gentleman from |
|
California, Mr. Issa. |
|
Mr. Issa. I thank the gentleman and I don't want to make |
|
this go any longer than necessary because I believe that there |
|
are not just enough votes, but there is an overwhelming |
|
majority in support of this. |
|
I might just comment, my good friend, Mr. Sherman noted, |
|
the details of what this bill does and doesn't do, and he is |
|
technically correct and I am not going to disagree with him. |
|
But what I would say is that Congress, in my 23 years, we are |
|
perfectly capable of passing a law that says do this, don't do |
|
this until they do that, and if they make even the smallest |
|
move toward freedom, toward not oppressing their people, toward |
|
not destabilizing the region, toward not exporting terrorism |
|
throughout South and Central America, just the slightest move, |
|
I would be happy and I hope that we are both still here in that |
|
time and that it is soon, but I would be happy to join the |
|
gentleman, my fellow gentleman from California, in passing |
|
another bill that says we are going to have an outreach and we |
|
are going to support an administration's outreach. But while we |
|
still have people who have permanent damage from having been |
|
bombarded through a somewhat unknown brain injuring event |
|
because we went there and opened our arms to the Cuban |
|
Government, we cannot do less than what we are doing today, so |
|
I am a cosponsor. Support it. And I thank the gentleman for |
|
yielding. I yield back. |
|
Chairman McCaul. The gentleman yields. Any further |
|
discussion? |
|
Mr. Cicilline is recognized. |
|
Mr. Cicilline. Thank you, Mr. Chairman. I am proud to |
|
represent a vibrant Cuban community in the State of Rhode |
|
Island. Cuban Americans represent some of the hardest working |
|
and brightest minds, not just from Rhode Island, but across our |
|
country. In 2016, I traveled with then President Obama on his |
|
historic trip to Cuba, as his administration charted a new |
|
course on U.S. policy toward Cuba. |
|
After 50 years of isolating Cuba, it was clear that U.S. |
|
foreign policy was not working. But through the Obama |
|
Administration's actions, we began to see positive developments |
|
between our countries, including expanded cooperation on |
|
counterterrorism, counternarcotics, coastal and marine |
|
protection and more. While there remain many unresolved issues |
|
in the relationship between our two nations, these changes gave |
|
the United States more tools to promote positive changes for |
|
the Cuban people. |
|
The Biden administration has made it clear that standing up |
|
for democracy and human rights will remain at the center of |
|
U.S. foreign policy, but we can still engage with the Cuban |
|
Government as we do with a number of other countries around the |
|
world that we have significant differences with. And that is |
|
why I was so disappointed to see President Trump and his |
|
administration roll back President Obama's actions on Cuba. |
|
This included the re-listing of Cuba as a State sponsor of |
|
terrorism with the likes of Iran, Syria, and North Korea, |
|
despite an intelligence review conducted in 2015 under |
|
President Obama showing that Cuba did not meet the statutory |
|
definition to be on that list. |
|
The classification of a country as a State sponsor of |
|
terrorism should always be led by the facts, not politics. The |
|
actions carried out by the Trump administration less than 10 |
|
days before the 2021 inauguration of a new President, weakens |
|
our credibility and really delegitimizes the State sponsor of |
|
terrorism list. |
|
And so as my colleague, Mr. Sherman, made clear, this is |
|
not a list of countries that aren't democracies. That would be |
|
a very long list. We have very robust relationships with many |
|
countries that are not democracies and we should always |
|
continue to promote democracy in every part of the world that |
|
we can, but this a very different designation. This is a State |
|
sponsor of terrorism. There is a definition for that. And there |
|
are three countries on it that have been repeatedly engaged in |
|
acts of terrorism around the world, Iran, Syria, and North |
|
Korea. We ought to take that seriously. We ought not undermine |
|
and delegitimize those classifications which mean something |
|
very, very specific, just because we have a long-standing |
|
disagreement with Cuba about their governance. |
|
The requirements that are contained in this proposal are |
|
very specific. It requires the development and sustaining of a |
|
very strong, liberal democracy. There are many countries that |
|
we deal with on a very regular basis that would not meet this |
|
definition, maybe as many as a hundred, but there is value in |
|
ongoing diplomatic relationships and work that we can do to |
|
improve the lives of the residents of those respective |
|
countries. |
|
So I think this is a very, very dangerous precedent. If we |
|
are going to lump on a list of State sponsors of terrorism |
|
countries that, in fact, are not meeting the statutory |
|
definition, countries that don't meet it as Iran has, Syria |
|
has, and North Korea, I think it makes a mockery of that very |
|
serious designation and is very counterproductive and will |
|
prevent us from continuing to engage with countries like Cuba |
|
in an effort to promote democracy and free speech and free and |
|
fair elections, et cetera. |
|
So I think this is a terrible idea. I have tremendous |
|
respect for the sponsor of this, but I urge my colleagues to |
|
vote no and I yield back. |
|
Chairman McCaul. The gentleman yields. Any further |
|
discussion? |
|
Mr. Huizenga. |
|
Mr. Huizenga. Thank you, Mr. Chairman. I will make a couple |
|
of comments and then yield to my colleague from Florida. My |
|
colleague from Rhode Island just had said this is about a |
|
``disagreement about their governance.'' This is far more than |
|
a disagreement about their governance. |
|
Last week, we had a hearing regarding the oppression of the |
|
Ortega regime in Nicaragua where they are literally throwing |
|
church leaders and political opponents in jail. Who are they |
|
supported by? Cuba. |
|
It seems to me, Mr. Chairman, that is a definition of a |
|
State sponsor of terrorism. And to me, if it walks like a duck, |
|
quacks like a duck, and supports terrorism, it is a State |
|
sponsor of terror. So why would we not say that? |
|
And I ask this question somewhat rhetorically. When has the |
|
Castro regime ever actually helped battle terrorism? They are |
|
there supporting the terrorists, both economically, as well as |
|
through encouragement and work through various agencies around |
|
the world. |
|
So I couldn't help and I will finish with this and pass it |
|
off to my colleague, I couldn't help but notice our next bill |
|
is dealing with Haiti, rightfully so. We are going to try to |
|
root out corruption and illegal activity and we are going to |
|
put sanctions on those folks and that bill would require that |
|
and a report to Congress. And we are talking about rolling that |
|
back for Cuba. And I simply don't understand it. I am |
|
supporting Cuba because of those Cuban families that came to |
|
West Michigan supported by my Dutch Reformed Church after the |
|
revolution, the Lugo |
|
[phonetic] family, the Cortina |
|
[phonetic] family, the Flores |
|
[phonetic] family, the Carro |
|
[phonetic] family. That is why we cannot forget. And I |
|
would like to yield to my colleague from Florida. |
|
Ms. Salazar. Thank you, my colleague, Mr. Huizenga. |
|
You know, it's the Cuba issue is dear to me because I |
|
represent the city of Miami, where you have 2 million Cuban |
|
Americans who escaped probably the worst revolution that the |
|
Americas has seen since the arrival of Christopher Columbus in |
|
1492. We're talking about the Cuba that Fidel Castro was able |
|
to elevate repressive methods to scientific levels. We're |
|
talking about a revolution that has been able to take away the |
|
spirituality, the human fiber from the average Cuban. |
|
So, I speak from the heart because I represent them, and |
|
respectfully, I disagree with the chairman and with other |
|
colleagues on the other side that do not agree with this |
|
amendment. It is that Cuba is a very bad actor. And if we give |
|
them 1 inch, they will take the whole body. |
|
If we allow--if we send the message to the Chinese and to |
|
the Russians that the Lourdes spy base is going to be up and |
|
open for business, we're going to have not one Chinese balloon, |
|
we could have many Russian balloons and Chinese balloons, |
|
because Cuba is dying to harm the United States in any way, |
|
shape, or form--not only the United States, through being |
|
proxy, like my colleague said, in Nicaragua, in Honduras, in |
|
Central America, in the Sandinistas, with Maduro, in Bolivia. |
|
Any way Cuba could find to harm the United States and to spread |
|
communism, it will be there. It will be there. |
|
But, even more so, they terrorize their own people. Like |
|
I'm not sure if you guys know, but, for instance, Cuba is in |
|
the business of human trafficking. You send doctors to the |
|
different missions. The doctors get paid $10,000 a month, and |
|
the country that receives those doctors needs to pay that |
|
salary back to the Cuban regime. And the doctor makes $200 out |
|
of $10,000. That is called human trafficking. And that's one of |
|
my causes right now with Mexico, saying to the President of |
|
Mexico, ``You cannot have on your soil human slaves.'' |
|
There are 55 minors who are in jail, kids that are 16, 17 |
|
years old. And what was their crime? To scream ``Freedom'' on |
|
the streets of Havana. |
|
The average Cuban makes 12 cents--12 cents--a day. They're |
|
only 90 miles away from the most important economic power in |
|
the world. Cuba had the per capita income of Italy in 1960. So, |
|
we're talking about that we're dealing with a very evil, |
|
pernicious regime, and we should not reward them to take them |
|
off that list. |
|
Thank you, Mr. Chairman. I yield back. |
|
Chairman McCaul. The gentlelady yields. |
|
Any further discussion on the bill? |
|
Mr. Lawler is recognized. |
|
Mr. Lawler. Thank you, Mr. Chairman. |
|
Chairman McCaul. I'm sorry, if the gentleman will yield, |
|
Ms. Kamlager-Dove. |
|
Ms. Kamlager-Dove. Thank you, Mr. Chair. |
|
I would like to speak to H.R. 314. I represent a small, but |
|
vibrant Cuban community in my district, and I must strongly |
|
oppose this bill. It reflects a failed performative policy |
|
toward Cuba that does nothing to advance U.S. interests and |
|
actively harms the very Cuban people we've been talking about. |
|
Codifying Cuba as a State sponsor of terrorism--a criteria |
|
satisfied only by the most malign actors--that it, objectively, |
|
does not meet, indicates that U.S. policy toward Cuba isn't |
|
about liberalism or the protection of human rights. It's about |
|
politically driven punishment. |
|
For one, this designation actively thwarts the |
|
liberalization that the United States is seeking, as my |
|
colleague from the Valley so eloquently Stated. It restricts |
|
the financial transactions that would allow everyday Cubans to |
|
open businesses and engage in trade and investment, stifling |
|
the private sector growth that could promote greater freedom in |
|
the country; impeding travel and academic exchanges that would |
|
enable U.S. institutions to support activists, artists, |
|
scholars, and journalists opposed to the regime. And |
|
critically, it is a major barrier for humanitarian and faith- |
|
based organizations to provide much-needed aid for the |
|
compounding crisis the Cuban people are facing. |
|
As it relates to the acts of terrorism, evidence has not |
|
really been provided by us to even support this designation. |
|
And if we are going to put countries on the list that harbor |
|
fugitives or terrorists, we have a very long list of countries |
|
we could add. In fact, many of them have been listed today. You |
|
could add Columbia or Venezuela or Nicaragua. You could add |
|
France for harboring Roman Polanski or even England or Ecuador |
|
for Julian Assange. But we are not doing that. |
|
So, anyone who cares about supporting the Cuban people and |
|
promoting a path to liberalization and normalization in the |
|
country should oppose this measure. And I urge my colleagues to |
|
vote against this bill. |
|
And with that, I yield back. |
|
Mr. Sherman. Will the gentlelady yield? Will the gentlelady |
|
from California yield the remaining part of her time? |
|
Ms. Kamlager-Dove. Yes, I will. |
|
Mr. Sherman. Thank you. |
|
I just want to quickly make the point, we're saying Cuba |
|
should be on the Terrorist List because it cooperates with bad |
|
governments, evil governments, in Nicaragua, China, Venezuela, |
|
and Russia. You know who's not on the Terrorist List? The |
|
governments of Nicaragua, China, Venezuela, and Russia. So, to |
|
say that Cuba should be on the list for hosting a Chinese |
|
listening post, when China isn't on the list for operating that |
|
post, seems a little selective. |
|
And with that, I will yield the time back to the lady, the |
|
gentlelady from California. |
|
Ms. Kamlager-Dove. Thank you so much, and I yield back the |
|
balance of my time. You said it most eloquently. |
|
Chairman McCaul. The gentlelady yields. |
|
Any further discussion? |
|
Mr. Lawler is recognized. |
|
Mr. Lawler. Thank you, Mr. Chairman. |
|
In response to my colleague, I would just say, then, maybe |
|
we should have that discussion about those other countries. |
|
But my wife comes from Moldova, a former satellite Soviet |
|
State that has been corrupted by Russian influence for years, |
|
since the collapse of the Soviet Union. This body took action |
|
recently, applying sanctions on individuals for financial |
|
corruption and other associated crimes. Because we, as the |
|
leader of the free world, have an obligation to root out |
|
corruption and to take on bad actors. |
|
This body, and my colleague who puts this bill forward, put |
|
a resolution on the floor condemning socialism and the horrors |
|
of it. Eighty-six Democrats voted against that. Fourteen of |
|
them couldn't find their way to the House floor to vote. A |
|
hundred people on the other side of the aisle couldn't be |
|
bothered to condemn socialism. |
|
There are bad actors in the world--Russia, China, Iran, |
|
North Korea, and, yes, Cuba. The Castro regime and the Cuban |
|
government have been oppressing the Cuban people for |
|
generations. They have engaged in ill-advised conduct and been |
|
party, going back to the beginnings of the cold war, to acts of |
|
aggression against the United States. They continue to |
|
cooperate with bad actors and terrorist regimes throughout the |
|
world. |
|
And this bill is simply saying that the President should |
|
not remove them from the list until such time that the Cuban |
|
government has become more democratic. We are a democracy, a |
|
democratic republic. We should act like it. We should embrace |
|
it, and we should not continue to allow bad actors to get away |
|
with whatever they want. |
|
This administration has been pathetically weak when it |
|
comes to taking on bad actors. China can fly a spy balloon |
|
across the entire continental United States without any |
|
repercussion. Russia can shoot down one of our drones without |
|
any repercussion. |
|
And my colleagues on the other side of the aisle twist |
|
themselves into knots trying to explain away socialism, |
|
communism, dictatorships, and it's embarrassingly pathetic. |
|
So, I encourage all of my colleagues to support this bill |
|
and continue to hold Cuba accountable for their bad acts until |
|
such time as they can finally see the light and treat their own |
|
residents, their own citizens, with the dignity and the decency |
|
that they deserve. |
|
I yield back. |
|
Chairman McCaul. The gentleman yields back. |
|
Any further discussion? |
|
Mr. Self is recognized. |
|
Mr. Self. I have heard the distinction here between, across |
|
the aisle, the people of Cuba, and on this side, the regime of |
|
Cuba. ``Convincing them to adopt democracy'' was a phrase I |
|
heard from one of my colleagues across the aisle. You do not |
|
convince autocratic regimes to adopt democracy. Evil stalks the |
|
world. It continues to stalk the world, and dictators do not |
|
change simply because we want to convince them to adopt |
|
democracy. |
|
I also heard the phrase ``warming relations with Cuba'' |
|
during the Obama Administration. I will remind people that the |
|
Obama Administration also had ``warming relations'' with Iran |
|
through the JCPOA. And I understand it was not just the United |
|
States, but it was led by the United States to return at least |
|
$50 billion to Iran. And Iran is certainly on this list and |
|
should remain on this list, and Cuba should remain on this list |
|
as well because it is a dictatorship and it does support |
|
terrorism. And we're not talking about a terrorist State, which |
|
I also heard; it is a State-sponsoring nation. |
|
So, I am firmly committed to this bill. I yield back. |
|
Chairman McCaul. The gentleman yields. |
|
Any further discussion? |
|
Mr. Mills is recognized. |
|
Mr. Mills. I want to point out a couple of things that we |
|
keep talking about here, and the same countries that continue |
|
to get notified, which is Iran, North Korea, China, Russia--the |
|
geopolitical alignment that we already know has formed and who |
|
is actually one of the biggest advocates of malign activities, |
|
whether that be from a kinetic response, as we're seeing with |
|
Russia in Ukraine; whether that be with China's continual |
|
aggression from an economic and resource perspective. But one |
|
thing is very clear. Chairman Xi has continued to try outreach |
|
to expand his global mechanism to strangle the American people. |
|
And it is a target on the West and our hemisphere. We have |
|
seen this, as my colleague has properly pointed out, with |
|
regard to the expansion of Chavez of Venezuela or Petro in |
|
Columbia, or in Honduras, who just separated their ties with |
|
Taiwan, at China's behest. |
|
We are seeing a continuation of the stronghold to cutoff |
|
the Western Hemisphere supply chain, whether that be through |
|
the Eurasian expansion, Asia, and Africa--or, sorry--Oceania |
|
and Africa takeover for the Road and Belt Initiative, or the |
|
increased taxation and tariffs in control of the Panama Canal. |
|
Or, what about the 500 football-field-sized satellite that is |
|
sitting in our own hemisphere, as my colleague, Ms. Salazar, |
|
has pointed out multiple times, that the State Department and |
|
others do not even recognize? |
|
We keep talking about terrorism as if it has to only be in |
|
a kinetic element, but we have to understand that terrorism can |
|
also be through cyberterrorism. It can also be through the |
|
threats and the terroristic capabilities of trying to cutoff |
|
food supply, as we're seeing, or supply chains to the West--the |
|
economic coercion that is undermining the United States |
|
continually. |
|
And we have seen time and time again, as my colleague from |
|
Texas pointed out with the failed Resolution 2231 or JCPOA, |
|
where we reward people, thinking it's going to take them off of |
|
the State sponsor of terrorism, when, in fact, they were in |
|
continual violations--``they'' being Iran--when it came to |
|
small and midrange ballistic missile capabilities being |
|
shuttled across into Yemen, utilized by the Houthis, and |
|
sponsoring terrorism there. |
|
So, my point in all of this is to say, we are continuing to |
|
see the malign activities building up more and more and more at |
|
the behest of China and Russia, who is a very solid partnership |
|
with Cuba and has been for 50 and 60-plus years. |
|
And for my colleagues to continually ignore this, and try |
|
to say that we need Cuba to act as if it's an individual malign |
|
actor, is nonsense. I stand in strong support of Ms. Salazar's |
|
bill to fight the oppression until the reign of Castro ends. I |
|
support a democratic process for a free Cuba, which is what the |
|
Cuban people have been fighting for and who have been |
|
dissidents as a result of this. |
|
But the reality is this, and I will correct one thing that |
|
one of my colleagues said: America is unique not because we are |
|
a democracy. We are not a democracy. We are a constitutional |
|
republic that protects our people. |
|
And until Cuba can do this and separate itself from the |
|
malign actors, they should remain on this list until anyone can |
|
prove to me otherwise. |
|
With that, I yield back. |
|
Chairman McCaul. The gentleman yields. |
|
Any further discussion? |
|
There being no further discussion of the bill, the |
|
committee will move to consideration of amendments. |
|
Does any member wish to offer an amendment? |
|
The ranking member is recognized. |
|
Mr. Meeks. I have an amendment at the desk. |
|
Chairman McCaul. The clerk shall distribute the amendment. |
|
The clerk shall report the amendment. |
|
The Clerk. ``Amendment to H.R. 314 offered by Mr. Meeks of |
|
New York. |
|
Page 2, after line 8, insert the following: |
|
Waiver. The''---- |
|
Chairman McCaul. Without objection, further reading of the |
|
amendment is dispensed with. |
|
[The amendment offered by Mr. Meeks follows:] |
|
|
|
[GRAPHIC(S) NOT AVAILABLE IN TIFF FORMAT] |
|
|
|
Chairman McCaul. The gentleman is recognized for 5 minutes |
|
on his amendment. |
|
Mr. Meeks. Thank you, Mr. Chairman. |
|
And I have a very simple amendment that I think that all of |
|
my colleagues should be able to support. And that's simply |
|
adding a waiver to this legislation. |
|
As I Stated at our first markup last month, there will not |
|
be bipartisan sanctions legislation in this committee without a |
|
waiver of some sort included within the legislation. And I hold |
|
myself to this same standard. |
|
For example, I want a more aggressive sanctioning of |
|
corrupt leaders of Haiti and the criminal gangs that lead to |
|
anarchy and violence in the streets of Port-au-Prince. And my |
|
legislation on the markup would impose mandatory sanctions on |
|
such individuals. |
|
But I can imagine times where we will need to work with |
|
unsavory characters to make sure Haitians can access food and |
|
basic humanitarian assistance. And that's why in my bill, which |
|
we'll talk about later, there is a waiver. And that's why this |
|
bill needs one also. |
|
My amendment here applies, basically, the same standard |
|
that Chairman McCaul applied to his bill in the DATA Act. So, |
|
it is something that I believe everyone on both sides of the |
|
aisle should be able to say yes to, because in that one we did. |
|
It simply would allow the President to waive the provisions |
|
of this legislation, should doing so be vital--if we waive it |
|
and there's a vital interest to America's national security |
|
interest. And on this, I genuinely hope that my amendment is |
|
something that we can look at and say we care about the Cuban |
|
people. So, we should waive certain things in these crises to |
|
help the Cuban people. So, this is really about the Cuban |
|
people. I would hope that everyone would be able to support |
|
this amendment. |
|
And I yield back the balance of my time. |
|
Chairman McCaul. The gentleman yields. |
|
Any other members seek recognition? |
|
The gentlelady, the author of the bill, Ms. Salazar, is |
|
recognized. |
|
Ms. Salazar. Thank you, Mr. Chairman. |
|
And respectfully, I disagree with Ranking Member Meeks |
|
because this amendment undermines the bill that I am |
|
introducing, because it prevents the law, which is the Libertad |
|
Act, or better known as the Helms-Burton law, from being |
|
followed. |
|
And basically, all that law says is that Cuba has to follow |
|
some of the democratic rules--free speech, basic freedoms, |
|
political activity, release political prisoners, free and fair |
|
elections, independent judiciary, trade unions and associations |
|
to be independent--simple stuff, what we have as a democracy |
|
and as a constitutional democracy, as my colleague mentioned. |
|
So, if we adopt or if we agree with your proposed amendment |
|
to H.R. 314, that will, then, do away with what we're |
|
presenting in this law, H.R. 314. |
|
Mr. Meeks. Will the gentlelady yield? |
|
Ms. Salazar. And it allows the national security interests |
|
to keep a communistic dictatorship 90 miles away from the |
|
United States on the list. So, I think it should be in the |
|
hands of Congress, just like the Helms-Burton is, and not in |
|
the hands of the President, because he could be swayed--not |
|
only this President, but any other, he could be swayed by |
|
political interests. |
|
And unfortunately, it's been 63 years of the Cuban people |
|
are in the hands of the most evil dictator that the Americas |
|
have seen. And so, for that reason, I believe that your |
|
amendment should not be considered. |
|
Thank you. I yield back. |
|
Chairman McCaul. The gentlelady yields back. |
|
Any further discussion? |
|
There being no further discussion, the question now occurs |
|
on the amendment offered by Representative Meeks, the ranking |
|
member. |
|
All those in favor, signify by saying aye. |
|
All those opposed, signify by saying no. |
|
In the opinion of the chair, the noes have it, and the |
|
amendment is not---- |
|
Mr. Meeks. Mr. Chairman, on that, I ask for a roll call |
|
vote. |
|
Chairman McCaul. A roll call vote has been requested. |
|
Pursuant to the chair's previous announcement, this vote |
|
will be postponed. |
|
Are there any further amendments? |
|
Ms. Kamlager-Dove is recognized. |
|
Ms. Kamlager-Dove. Thank you, Mr. Chairman. |
|
I have an amendment at the desk. |
|
Chairman McCaul. The clerk shall distribute the amendment. |
|
The clerk shall report the amendment. |
|
The Clerk. ``Amendment to H.R. 314 offered by Ms. Kamlager- |
|
Dove of California. |
|
Page 2, beginning on line 5'' |
|
Chairman McCaul. Without objection, further reading of the |
|
amendment is dispensed with. |
|
[The amendment offered by Ms. Kamlager-Dove follows:] |
|
|
|
[GRAPHIC(S) NOT AVAILABLE IN TIFF FORMAT] |
|
|
|
Chairman McCaul. The gentlelady is recognized for 5 minutes |
|
on her amendment. |
|
Ms. Kamlager-Dove. Thank you, Mr. Chair. |
|
As we have discussed, H.R. 13--314 ties the removal of Cuba |
|
State sponsor of terrorism designation to conditions that have |
|
nothing to do with the support for terrorism. This would |
|
evidently weaken any incentive to change alleged terrorism- |
|
related behavior because doing so would not result in the |
|
lifting of the SSOT sanctions. My amendment would simply strike |
|
these counterproductive requirements and make the designation |
|
conditioned solely on meeting SSOT criteria. |
|
Anyone who believes that Cuba would legitimately qualify |
|
for this classification should support my amendment. I have |
|
made it easy. Given that an exhaustive review by the |
|
intelligence community in 2015 concluded that Cuba was not in |
|
fact an actor similar to North Korea, Iran, or Syria. This |
|
amendment highlights the attempted weaponization of the SSOT |
|
for punitive politically driven purposes. I urge all of my |
|
colleagues to support this commonsense amendment and I yield |
|
back. |
|
Chairman McCaul. The gentlelady yields back. |
|
I oppose this amendment. Any other members seek |
|
recognition? |
|
Ms. Salazar is recognized. |
|
Ms. Salazar. Thank you, Mr. Chairman. |
|
Once again this new amendment undermines the bill that we |
|
just introduced, H.R. 314. Why? Because it eliminates the |
|
reference to the LIBERTAD Act. The LIBERTAD Act is law right |
|
now, which is the one that codifies the United States' embargo |
|
against Cuba. And that law--all it says is that Cuba could join |
|
the international community if it were to behave like a |
|
responsible actor, a Democratic constitutional democracy. Once |
|
again, free speech, basic human rights, political activities, |
|
release political prisoners; 55 of them are less than 18 years |
|
old, allow and accept and assure the right to private property, |
|
make commitments to free and fair elections, establish an |
|
independent judiciary, simple things what we have that we |
|
aspire for Cubans to have and for the rest of the hemisphere to |
|
enjoy as well. |
|
So by this amendment that was just introduced eliminates |
|
that reference to the LIBERTAD Act which enumerates what I just |
|
presented and allows the President to unilaterally remove Cuba |
|
from the list. And once again it should be in the hands of the |
|
legislature, in the hands of the U.S. Congress, not in the |
|
hands of the Executive because he could--he or she in the |
|
future could be motivated by political interests. Thank you. I |
|
yield back. |
|
Chairman McCaul. The gentlelady yields back. |
|
Do any other members seek recognition? |
|
The ranking member is recognized. |
|
Mr. Meeks. Thank you, Mr. Chairman. |
|
I support this amendment. A State sponsor of terror |
|
designation should not depend on your status on a well- |
|
respected human rights poll. It should not depend on your World |
|
Bank ease of doing business ranking. It should not depend on |
|
whether your country has good relations with the United States, |
|
but it should depend on whether you are a sponsor of |
|
international terrorism. |
|
Cuba was removed from the State Sponsor of Terrorism list |
|
in 2015 after an exhaustive review by experts at the State |
|
Department and in the intelligence community. It was the Trump |
|
administration. And they did not cite any new facts to justify |
|
its decision to relist Cuba in the waning days of his |
|
administration. |
|
By the way, it was during the same time this country's |
|
attention was still glued to the events of January the 6th. By |
|
the way, it is the same president that had in Mar-a-Lago Orban |
|
from Hungary. It is the same president that had a bromance with |
|
someone who is on the State Terrorist list, Kim Jong-un. It is |
|
the same president who had and said that Russia's intelligence |
|
was better than ours and accepted Russia's Statements against |
|
the United States. Same guy. But he said nothing different in |
|
regards talking about Cuba. |
|
It sounds simple because it is simple. A State sponsor of |
|
terror designation should be about a State sponsoring what? |
|
Terrorism. |
|
I support this amendment. All of the States, as Mr. Sherman |
|
talked about earlier, that they say that Cuba supports et |
|
cetera in--on the Western Hemisphere, none of them are on the |
|
State Sponsor of Terrorism list. So I support this amendment |
|
and I urge everyone to do the same. |
|
Mr. Sherman. Will the gentleman yield? |
|
Mr. Meeks [continuing]. Back. |
|
Chairman McCaul. The gentleman yields back. |
|
Any other members seek recognition? |
|
Mr. Self? I am sorry, Mr. Mast recognized. |
|
Mr. Mast. Thank you, Chairman. |
|
I just wonder if the ranking member will define the word |
|
bromance for us? I am happy to yield. |
|
Mr. Meeks. Yes. Bromance is when someone says I talk to him |
|
a lot. I got to know him very well. He was very smart, very |
|
cunning, very streetwise and we spoke a lot. Actually we spoke |
|
a lot and I think we had a really, you know, a great |
|
relationship. I don't know if you remember when we started that |
|
relationship. It was very, very nasty then, but now we get |
|
along. That is a---- |
|
Mr. Mast. Are you describing a bromance or is that the |
|
definition of a bromance? |
|
Mr. Meeks. That is a bromance. |
|
Mr. Mast. Could you give me the definition of---- |
|
Mr. Meeks. I call that a bromance. That is---- |
|
Mr. Mast. Give me the definition of a bromance. |
|
Mr. Meeks [continuing]. President--from the former |
|
president of the United States. |
|
Mr. Mast. Thanks. |
|
Mr. Meeks. That is a bromance. |
|
Mr. Mast. This is definitely not a bromance, but thank you |
|
for your attempt. |
|
Chairman McCaul. The gentleman yields. |
|
Mr. Mast. I yield. |
|
Chairman McCaul. And thanks for that enlighting definition. |
|
The chair recognizes Mr. Self. |
|
Mr. Self. For once I agree with the ranking member. This is |
|
very simple. The year 2015 tells you everything you need to |
|
know about this amendment. 2015 is also the year that the JCPOA |
|
was instituted. And he said that President Trump introduced no |
|
facts. We didn't need to introduce any new facts because they |
|
were already known. So once I agree with the ranking member, |
|
but everything he argued argues against this amendment. Thank |
|
you very much. I yield back. |
|
Chairman McCaul. The gentleman yields. |
|
Any further discussion? |
|
Let me just say I oppose this amendment. The definition of |
|
a State sponsor of terrorism is a country that has repeatedly |
|
supported acts of terrorism. I believe the Cuban regime |
|
embodies this definition. |
|
With that, there being no further discussion, the question |
|
now occurs on the amendment offered by Ms. Kamlager-Dove. |
|
All those in favor, signify by saying aye. |
|
All those opposed, signify by saying no. |
|
In the opinion of the chair, the noes have it; the |
|
amendment is not agreed to. |
|
Mr. Meeks. Mr. Chairman, with that I would ask for a roll |
|
call vote. |
|
Chairman McCaul. Roll call vote has been requested. |
|
Pursuant to the chair's previous announcement, this vote will |
|
be postponed. |
|
Are there any further amendments? |
|
Mr. Jackson is recognized. |
|
Mr. Jackson of Illinois. Thank you, Mr. Chair. |
|
Chairman McCaul. The clerk shall distribute---- |
|
Mr. Johnson of Louisiana. I have an amendment at the desk. |
|
I have major concern with the---- |
|
Chairman McCaul. Mr. Jackson will pause while your |
|
amendment is being circulated and then I will recognize you to |
|
speak on your amendment. |
|
Mr. Jackson of Illinois. Thank you, Mr. Chairman. |
|
Chairman McCaul. Thank you. |
|
The clerk shall report the amendment. |
|
The. Clerk. Amendment to H.R. 314 offered by Mr. Jackson of |
|
Illinois. At the end of the bill add the following: Section 3-- |
|
-- |
|
Chairman McCaul. Without objection, further reading of the |
|
amendment is dispensed with. The gentleman is recognized for 5 |
|
minutes on his amendment. |
|
[The amendment offered by Mr. Jackson of Illinois follows:] |
|
|
|
[GRAPHIC(S) NOT AVAILABLE IN TIFF FORMAT] |
|
|
|
Mr. Jackson of Illinois. Mr. Chair, I have major concerns |
|
with the FORCE Act because I do not believe that Cuba meets the |
|
requirements for a State sponsor of terror. I am also concerned |
|
that we are trying to issue--we are tying issues unrelated to |
|
terrorism to a State sponsor of terror designation. This is not |
|
how our foreign policy should work. |
|
I share the sponsor's interest in helping the people of |
|
Cuba, a country that I have traveled to several times, but do |
|
not believe this legislation is the way to bring about change |
|
on the island. |
|
My amendment is simple. It would sunset the legislation |
|
after 2 years. It has been long the policy of my friends across |
|
the aisle to support sunset on legislation. The very |
|
legislative protocol on the majority leader's website |
|
emphasizes the importance of sunsets and sanctions legislations |
|
put forward by Chairman McCaul last markup also had a sunset. |
|
Even if we disagree on the underlying legislation, I feel |
|
that we should all agree that it is important not to lack--to |
|
lock in a permanent policy that would be difficult to change |
|
when circumstances change or alter. I urge all of my colleagues |
|
to support my amendment. |
|
And for a point of record I would like to note that |
|
President Castro, or however you call him, died 7 years ago. So |
|
when we talk about his regime, he has not been dead longer than |
|
the statute of limitations. Thank you. |
|
Chairman McCaul. The gentleman yields back. |
|
Any further discussion on the amendment? |
|
Mr. Lawler is recognized. |
|
Mr. Lawler. Thank you. |
|
I would just note last week Secretary of State Blinken |
|
said, quote/unquote, ``We are not planning to remove Cuba from |
|
the list.'' So for my colleagues who say that they don't meet |
|
the definition, that they are not a State sponsor of terrorism, |
|
that we on this side of the aisle are wrong about this, then |
|
you should pick up the phone and talk to the Secretary of State |
|
because he agrees with us that they clearly meet the |
|
definition, which is why the administration is not making any |
|
efforts to remove them from the list. |
|
So this bill would simply make it clear that the President |
|
and the Secretary of State, who have agreed with us that they |
|
are not removing Cuba from the list, cannot do so until such |
|
time as Cuba complies with the LIBERTAD Act. So I yield back. |
|
Chairman McCaul. The gentleman yields back. |
|
Any further discussion? |
|
The ranking member is recognized. |
|
Mr. Meeks. Thank you, Mr. Chairman. |
|
I support this amendment. It would sunset the legislation |
|
after 2 years and would give Congress and the executive branch |
|
more flexibility should circumstances on the ground change in |
|
the years to come. The majority leaders have a legislative |
|
protocol on sunsetting legislation precisely because it allows |
|
Congress the flexibility to do its job. And that is what this |
|
will do. If circumstances change, Congress can move quickly |
|
because we have sunsetted and we had the opportunity to look at |
|
it. |
|
And with that I yield back the balance of my time and ask |
|
everyone to support it. |
|
Chairman McCaul. The gentleman yields. |
|
Any further discussion on the amendment? |
|
Let me say that I opposed this amendment. I believe it |
|
would be irresponsible to remove Cuba from the State Sponsor of |
|
Terrorist list based on an arbitrary timeline. So we must focus |
|
on their dangerous behavior until it stops. |
|
There being no further discussion, the question now occurs |
|
on the amendment offered by Mr. Jackson. |
|
All those in favor, signify by saying aye. |
|
All those opposed, signify by saying no. |
|
In the opinion of the chair, the noes have it. The |
|
amendment is not agreed to. |
|
The ranking member is recognized. |
|
Mr. Meeks. I request the yeas and nays. |
|
Chairman McCaul. Roll call vote has been requested. |
|
Pursuant to the chair's previous announcement this vote will be |
|
postponed. |
|
Are there any further amendments? |
|
Pursuant to notice I now call up H.R. 1684, the Haiti |
|
Criminal Collusion Transparency Act of 2023. |
|
[The Bill H.R. 1684 follows:] |
|
|
|
[GRAPHIC(S) NOT AVAILABLE IN TIFF FORMAT] |
|
|
|
Chairman McCaul. The bill was circulated in advance and the |
|
clerk shall designate the bill. |
|
The. Clerk. H.R. 1684, a bill to require the Secretary of |
|
State to submit an annual report to Congress regarding the ties |
|
between criminal gangs and political and economic elites in |
|
Haiti and impose sanctions on political and economic elites |
|
involved in such criminal activities. |
|
Chairman McCaul. Without objection, the first reading is |
|
dispensed with. The bill is considered read and open to |
|
amendment at any point. |
|
I now recognize myself for a Statement on the bill. |
|
Ranking Member Meeks and Congresswoman Cherfilus-McCormick, |
|
I want to thank you both for introducing this measure to |
|
address the lawlessness and corruption in Haiti. |
|
We had a hearing on this very issue and it is astounding |
|
how organized crime and gangs have taken over, like these |
|
warlords almost similar to Somalia in Haiti. And that is why I |
|
strongly support this measure. |
|
I think the rising levels of gang violence, political |
|
instability, kidnappings of Haitian and American citizens, |
|
poverty remains exceptionally high making Haiti the poorest |
|
country in the region and one of the most dangerous. To make |
|
matters worse Haiti has been experiencing a resurgence of |
|
cholera since last October after no cases were documented for |
|
over 3 years. |
|
I remain deeply troubled by the deteriorating health |
|
conditions as well as the violent warfare being waged by these |
|
warlords making it impossible for Haiti to find any stable form |
|
of governance. As I said, it is very reminiscent of Somalia and |
|
the situation there. |
|
I think these corrupt oligarchs, political elites use these |
|
gangs as brokers to advance their own personal interest and |
|
economic financial at the expense of the people. The absent |
|
government combined with the total lack of law and order is a |
|
primary driver of illegal immigration against the United |
|
States. So this measure is welcome, a welcome step in shining a |
|
light on the criminal activity in Haiti and to look at--to |
|
sanction those who are engaged in it. |
|
Specifically it will require the State Department to |
|
examine and report on times between gangs and the political and |
|
economic elites, establish visa restrictions, targeted |
|
sanctions against gangs, and Haiti's political and economic |
|
elite. While Haiti's challenges are difficult, the United |
|
States must remain committed to stopping this. And I was |
|
actually quite shocked when we had our hearing to hear that our |
|
international law enforcement is virtually absent from Haiti, |
|
and the Caribbean for that matter. |
|
And, Mr. Chairman, I look forward--not only do I support |
|
this measure, but I look forward to working with you on future |
|
legislation to address this rising problem. |
|
And with that, I yield back and I yield to you, Ranking |
|
Member Meeks. |
|
Mr. Meeks. Thank you, Mr. Chairman. |
|
And thank you for those words and thank you for joining |
|
with us. |
|
And I want to thank Congresswoman Cherfilus-McCormick for |
|
her hard word and--on this bill also. |
|
There are as many as 200 gangs in Haiti who now control at |
|
least 60 percent of Port-au-Prince. The number of reported |
|
homicides for 2022 increased by 35.2 percent. Without a doubt |
|
Haiti is in a dire situation. The United Nations Office on |
|
Drugs and Crime report released in 2023 report that |
|
increasingly sophisticated and high-caliber firearms and |
|
ammunition are trafficked to--into Haiti amid an unprecedented |
|
and rapidly deteriorating security situation. |
|
Haiti also remains a trans-shipment country for drugs, |
|
primarily cocaine and cannabis, which mostly enter the country |
|
via boat or plane arriving through public and private and |
|
informal ports, as well as clandestine runways. |
|
Haiti's borders are porous and the challenges of patrolling |
|
1,100 miles of coastline and a 243-mile land border with the |
|
Dominican Republic are overwhelming the capacities of Haiti's |
|
national police, customs, border patrols, and coast guard who |
|
are severely understaffed and under-resourced and increasingly |
|
targeted by gangs. |
|
And while I have seen some forward movement recently with |
|
vital support from the Biden administration on police training |
|
this January and the announcement and roll out of sanctions |
|
last October, heavily armed criminal gangs are targeting ports, |
|
highways, critical infrastructure, custom officers, police |
|
stations, courthouses, prisons, businesses, and neighborhoods. |
|
And we need to continue to apply pressure. |
|
The ongoing political paralysis has led to further de- |
|
stabilization which is being felt by Haitians across the |
|
country and those living in the diaspora. The United States |
|
should not and cannot be in the business of appointing leaders |
|
in sovereign nations. Last Congress I made it clear that the |
|
pathway toward stability must be by coordinated and led--must |
|
be coordinated and led by the Haitian people. |
|
Our job is to listen to the people of Haiti, work with our |
|
regional partners to add a semblance of stability in the |
|
country. This means continuing to investigate those involved in |
|
illegal trafficking of firearms from the United States to |
|
Haitian gangs. It means holding corrupt officials accountable |
|
by ensuring that these actors are not allowed to travel freely |
|
to the United States or own houses and other assets in our |
|
country. It also means assisting Haiti in finding closure and |
|
moving past the horrific assassination of Former President |
|
Moise. |
|
This is why I introduced this bill along with Chairman |
|
McCaul and of course subcommittee Chairwoman Salazar and |
|
Representative Cherfilus-McCormick in a bipartisan effort to |
|
ensure that Congress receives regular reports on the role that |
|
Haitian economic and political elite play in masterminding and |
|
providing support for Haitian gangs. We must ensure that we do |
|
not repeat previous United States mistakes in Haiti. |
|
In order to move away from the political paralysis that has |
|
gripped Haiti over the last few years the Haitian people need |
|
to believe that their voices matter, that their government is |
|
there to help. We know that these conditions are causing the |
|
rise in migration out of Haiti as people seek safety at any |
|
cost. |
|
We have a duty to make sure that we identify and hold |
|
accountable those who relish in the chaos caused by supporting |
|
gang activity using kidnappings and rape to control and silence |
|
communities and use coercion to bring youth in and around the |
|
Port-au-Prince into the disservice of criminal activity. We |
|
cannot allow them to walk around--the gang leaders and those |
|
that are supporting them to walk around with impunity. We must |
|
show the people of Haiti that they have the opportunity to take |
|
this and control themselves and not allow the gangs to rule and |
|
dictate and that the United States will hold accountable those |
|
that try to travel back and forth from Haiti and commit these |
|
committal--these terrible acts and criminal activity. |
|
So I ask--and again thank the chairman. I support this |
|
measure and I ask everyone else to do the same. I yield back |
|
the balance of my time. |
|
Chairman McCaul. The gentleman yields. |
|
Any further discussion on the bill? |
|
Let me say also the women impacted in Haiti is probably the |
|
most egregious and disturbing out of all of this, but Ms. |
|
Kamlager-Dove is recognized. |
|
Ms. Kamlager-Dove. Thank you, Mr. Chair. |
|
I want to express my support for H.R. 1684, the Haiti |
|
Criminal Transparency Collusion Act, and I am so excited that |
|
this is bipartisan. |
|
The deteriorating humanitarian and security crisis in Haiti |
|
is unprecedented in the Western Hemisphere. One of our closest |
|
neighbors is experiencing what the U.N. High Commissioner on |
|
Human Rights describes as a living nightmare with sexual |
|
violence, kidnappings, displacement, and indiscriminate killing |
|
as part of an everyday life for so many there. |
|
The situation in Haiti is not receiving the urgent |
|
spotlight that it deserves. It rarely does. It rarely does. The |
|
Haitian people have a long history of resilience and grit in |
|
the face of relentless manmade and natural disasters. This is a |
|
country born out of the fight for dignity and human rights |
|
against colonialism, systemic racism, and slavery. Haiti can |
|
and it will persevere. |
|
This bill says that we should not write the situation off |
|
as hopeless and insurmountable. We must continue to support the |
|
Haitian people with intentional policies and concerted |
|
international action. I am glad that this bill takes a strong |
|
step in holding accountable those who are perpetuating and |
|
benefiting from the country's chronic insecurity. I hope that |
|
this is the first step and not an only step. |
|
I have to say I was at the U.N. yesterday and we can do |
|
more, we should do more, we need to do more. That was what I |
|
heard at every meeting. |
|
And, Mr. Chair, I am not surprised that the international |
|
community has been absent in Haiti. Haiti has always gotten a |
|
salty side-eye from the international community because of its |
|
history of really fighting and winning against the French long, |
|
long ago. And we have an obligation, we have an obligation to |
|
stay with Haiti, to go to Haiti, and to be supportive of a |
|
country that needs us and that needs us to help in the right |
|
way. We cannot in good conscience stand by as a humanitarian |
|
catastrophe unfolds miles from our shores against folks with |
|
African descent who need to see us. And I urge my colleagues to |
|
support this bill. I yield back the balance of my time. |
|
Chairman McCaul. The gentlelady yields back. |
|
Any further discussion on the bill? |
|
Mrs. Cherfilus-McCormick. Thank you so much, Mr. Chairman, |
|
for supporting this bill. |
|
And thank you so much, Ranking Member Meeks, for your |
|
leadership, especially when it comes to the Haitian people. |
|
This bill is extremely important to the Haitian community |
|
and America, especially since we see many of these political |
|
elites are living in South Florida, are living throughout the |
|
United States, and are buying homes, shipping weapons every |
|
single day. |
|
It impacts us even more when we have a couple who--33- |
|
years-old living in my district who has been kidnapped. They |
|
were on their way in Haiti doing mission work to try and help |
|
the Haitian people and they got on the bus and they asked for |
|
the Americans and kidnapped them. This is our first attempt in |
|
actually trying to resolve this issue and I hope that we can |
|
work bipartisan-ly to make sure we have more initiatives so we |
|
can help the Haitian people, but also the Haitian Americans who |
|
are suffering from this situation. Thank you so much. |
|
Chairman McCaul. The gentlelady yields back. |
|
Any further discussion on the bill? |
|
Mr. Lawler is recognized. |
|
Mr. Lawler. Thank you, Mr. Chairman. |
|
I want to thank the ranking member for introducing this |
|
legislation. |
|
I have one of the largest Haitian diaspora in my district, |
|
primarily in Spring Valley, New York. And the concerns about |
|
the political and economic crises in Haiti are significant. And |
|
obviously when we look at what occurred with respect to the |
|
assassination of the president and the fallout from that, as |
|
well as the continued gang activity and the links between the |
|
Haitian political class and the economic elites with the |
|
country and the impact that that is having on the residents of |
|
Haiti and on the diaspora, I think this legislation is |
|
critically important. |
|
I think as we discussed with the previous legislation, it |
|
is important for the United States to take a leadership role in |
|
our hemisphere and to be working with our allies, but to also |
|
crack down where there is corruption, where there are |
|
challenges in our region of the world. And I think Haiti is a |
|
perfect example of that. We have a vested interest in it and we |
|
need to be doing more to help root out the political |
|
corruption, the gang activity, and the economic corruption |
|
which has had a devastating impact on the people of hearing. |
|
So I am fully in support of this legislation and I thank |
|
the ranking member for bringing it forward. |
|
Chairman McCaul. The gentleman yields back. |
|
Any further discussion on the bill? |
|
Mr. Jackson is recognized. |
|
Mr. Jackson of Illinois. Yes, sir. Thank you, Mr. Chairman. |
|
I would like to also recognize on behalf of the Haitian |
|
community--we have to keep in perspective, if you will, the |
|
United States this is a debtor to Haiti. Haiti has long been an |
|
ally of the United States. Haiti was the first country of |
|
Africans to have thrown off the yoke of colonialism and |
|
enslavement and they were punished. Haiti didn't finish paying |
|
reparations back to its colonial powers until 1940's in the |
|
United States. And since then we have had a no-trade/no |
|
development policy with them. |
|
So Haiti doesn't come here begging. Haiti comes here |
|
looking for assistance. They are a dignified people and, |
|
frankly, we lose credibility in the world and our standing when |
|
we have the poorest country off of our coast because we have |
|
been ambivalent and indifferent toward giving them assistance. |
|
They are also a people of tremendous integrity having |
|
recognized Taiwan. They don't sidestep the need for Taiwanese |
|
recognition. They have had the courage to do so and to peril |
|
themselves by not getting any assistance from us or them. So I |
|
strongly encourage that we support our Haitian colleagues and |
|
comrades. |
|
Chairman McCaul. The gentleman yields back. |
|
Any further discussion on the bill? |
|
Mr. McCormick? |
|
Mr. McCormick. Thank you, sir. This is very pertinent to a |
|
discussion I had just last night from a guy who was actually my |
|
translator during the Haitian earthquake in which lots of |
|
people died. We did fasciotomies. We had a whole mission field |
|
go over there and help them out. And we still see the same |
|
problems since before and after the earthquake a decade later. |
|
Just a quick interaction. |
|
This is a guy who has been back and forth. He does his own |
|
church there. He is literally in fear of his life. When he |
|
comes over here to raise money for his mission--one of the |
|
interesting things just happened just last night when he was |
|
texting me he said I reapply for the visa today. I pray they |
|
renew it. The worst case scenario is if they call me to come to |
|
the embassy for an interview in person. I would hate taking the |
|
risk to go to Port-au-Prince. I pray that everything happens |
|
online. In other words, he fears for his life just to go into |
|
the capital to apply for a visa at an embassy. |
|
Furthermore, when I said that, look, we need to go out, we |
|
need to make sure we have better security in this country |
|
that's right next door to us. He literally said; and this is |
|
the--one of the poorest people I know, ``That would be amazing |
|
thing. That's what we need. We do not need money as much as we |
|
need security and peace.'' In other words, poverty is one thing |
|
you can deal with, but you cannot deal with a scenario where |
|
you may be kidnapped or robbed at any given time, where your |
|
wife who just gave birth can't get food because you are worked |
|
to even go to the store. The fact that we have gone in there |
|
with Marines before and we had the same problem later is |
|
egregious. |
|
I was just talking to my fellow Congressman and freshman |
|
Ronny Jackson last night about how we have a United Nations for |
|
a reason. I am not sure what--the reason other than a lot of |
|
times they speak against the United States and against Israel, |
|
but besides that I have yet to see them step up and actually do |
|
something in this very, very impoverished country that needs to |
|
peace as much as it needs money. And with that I yield. |
|
Chairman McCaul. The gentleman yields back. |
|
Any further discussion on the bill? |
|
There being no further discussion, the committee will move |
|
to consideration of amendments. Does any member wish to offer |
|
an amendment? |
|
Mr. Perry is recognized. |
|
Mr. Perry. Mr. Chairman, I have got an amendment at the |
|
desk. |
|
Chairman McCaul. The clerk shall distribute the amendment. |
|
Mr. Cicilline. Mr. Chairman, I reserve a point of order. |
|
Chairman McCaul. Point of order is recognized. |
|
The clerk shall report the amendment. |
|
The. Clerk. Amendment to H.R. 1684 offered by Mr. Perry of |
|
Pennsylvania. Page 6, after line 18. Insert the following: |
|
Including a list of each criminal organization assessed to be |
|
trafficking Haitians and other individuals to the United States |
|
border. |
|
Chairman McCaul. Without objection, further reading of the |
|
amendment is dispensed with. The gentleman from Pennsylvania is |
|
recognized for 5 minutes on his amendment. |
|
Mr. Perry. I thank the chairman. |
|
This amendment simply requires reporting, reporting on the |
|
rampant human trafficking coming from these criminal |
|
organizations to our already overwhelmed southern border. |
|
Having a better understanding to what extent these groups |
|
continue to traffic humans to our southern border is crucial to |
|
solving the issues we face at the southern border, and quite |
|
honestly, any one of our borders. |
|
Criminal organizations commit heinous crimes against those |
|
they traffic and they literally have no regard for life, for it |
|
is not humane to operate an open border that encourages all the |
|
violence and dehumanization associated with human trafficking. |
|
And it is why it is crucial that we specifically have reporting |
|
language regarding human trafficking because not only is it |
|
crucial to the region's security, but it is crucial to the |
|
United States' national security. |
|
In closing this amendment simply helps us understand the |
|
scope and severity of how Haitian criminal organizations are |
|
trafficking populations to our borders and informs Congress so |
|
that we can make more informed and better decisions regarding |
|
solutions to those problems. |
|
With that, Mr. Chairman, I urge adoption and I yield the |
|
balance. |
|
Chairman McCaul. The gentleman yields back. |
|
Let me say I support this amendment. |
|
Any other members seek recognition? |
|
The ranking member is recognized. |
|
Mr. Meeks. Mr. Chairman, the people of Haiti and the entire |
|
region impacted by the crises Haiti faces deserve to know which |
|
organizations and individuals support de-stabilizing criminal |
|
activity including those who take advantage of desperate people |
|
who are already extremely vulnerable and traffic them |
|
throughout the region making financial gains at every stop |
|
along the way. |
|
So I strongly support this amendment and ask my colleagues |
|
to do the same. I yield back the balance of my time. |
|
Chairman McCaul. The gentleman yields back. |
|
Any further discussion on the amendment? |
|
There being no further discussion, does the gentleman, Mr. |
|
Cicilline, insist on his point of order? |
|
Mr. Cicilline. I do not, Mr. Chairman. |
|
Chairman McCaul. The gentleman withdraws his point of |
|
order. |
|
The question now occurs on the amendment offered by Mr. |
|
Perry. |
|
All those in favor, signify by saying aye. |
|
All those opposed, signify by saying no. |
|
In the opinion of the chair, the ayes have it and the |
|
amendment is agreed to. |
|
There being no further amendments, I move that the |
|
committee report H.R. 1684, as amended, to the House with a |
|
favorable recommendation. |
|
All those in favor, signify by saying aye. |
|
All those opposed, signify by saying no. |
|
In the opinion of the chair, the ayes have it and the |
|
motion is agreed to. |
|
Without objection, the motion to reconsider is laid on the |
|
table. Staff is authorized to make any technical and conforming |
|
change. |
|
Committee will recess for about 10 minutes subject to the |
|
call of the chair. The clerk will send out a notice when we |
|
reconvene to vote. |
|
[Recess.] |
|
Chairman McCaul. The committee will come to order. |
|
The committee postponed further proceedings on the recorded |
|
vote on amendment No. 8 offered by Representative Meeks on |
|
which the noes had prevailed by voice vote. |
|
The question occurs on agreeing to the amendment. The clerk |
|
will call the roll. |
|
The Clerk. Representative Smith? |
|
Smith? |
|
[No response.] |
|
The Clerk. Representative Wilson? |
|
Representative Wilson? |
|
Mr. Wilson. No. |
|
The Clerk. Wilson votes no. |
|
Representative Perry? |
|
Mr. Perry. No. |
|
The Clerk. Perry votes no. |
|
Representative Issa? |
|
Mr. Issa. No. |
|
The Clerk. Issa votes no. |
|
Representative Wagner? |
|
Wagner? |
|
[No response.] |
|
The Clerk. Representative Mast? |
|
Mr. Mast. No. |
|
The Clerk. Mast votes no. |
|
Representative Buck? |
|
Buck? |
|
[No response.] |
|
The Clerk. Representative Burchett? |
|
Mr. Burchett. No. |
|
The Clerk. Burchett votes no. |
|
Representative Green? |
|
Mr. Green. No. |
|
The Clerk. Green votes no. |
|
Representative Barr? |
|
Mr. Barr. No. |
|
The Clerk. Barr votes no. |
|
Representative Ronny Jackson? |
|
Jackson? |
|
[No response.] |
|
The Clerk. Representative Young Kim? |
|
Mrs. Kim of California. No. |
|
The Clerk. Kim votes no. |
|
Representative Salazar? |
|
Ms. Salazar. Salazar votes no. |
|
The Clerk. Salazar votes no. |
|
Representative Huizenga? |
|
Mr. Huizenga. No. |
|
The Clerk. Huizenga votes no. |
|
Representative Radewagen? |
|
Mrs. Radewagen. Nay. |
|
The Clerk. Representative Radewagen votes no. |
|
Representative Hill? |
|
Mr. Hill. Hill no. |
|
The Clerk. Hill votes no. |
|
Representative Davidson? |
|
Mr. Davidson. No. |
|
The Clerk. Davidson votes no. |
|
Representative Baird? |
|
Mr. Baird. No. |
|
The Clerk. Baird votes no. |
|
Representative Waltz? |
|
Mr. Waltz. No. |
|
The Clerk. Waltz votes no. |
|
Representative Kean? |
|
Mr. Kean. No. |
|
The Clerk. Kean votes no. |
|
Representative Lawler? |
|
Mr. Lawler. No. |
|
The Clerk. Lawler votes no. |
|
Representative Mills? |
|
Mr. Mills. No. |
|
The Clerk. Mills votes no. |
|
Representative McCormick? |
|
Mr. McCormick. No. |
|
The Clerk. McCormick votes no. |
|
Representative Moran? |
|
Mr. Moran. No. |
|
The Clerk. Moran votes no. |
|
Representative James? |
|
Mr. James. No. |
|
The Clerk. James votes no. |
|
Representative Self? |
|
Mr. Self. No. |
|
The Clerk. Self votes no. |
|
Ranking Member Meeks? |
|
Mr. Meeks. Aye. |
|
The Clerk. Meeks votes aye. |
|
Representative Sherman? |
|
Mr. Sherman. Aye. |
|
The Clerk. Sherman votes aye. |
|
Representative Connolly? |
|
Mr. Connolly. Aye. |
|
The Clerk. Connolly votes aye. |
|
Representative Keating? |
|
Keating? |
|
[No response.] |
|
The Clerk. Representative Cicilline? |
|
Mr. Cicilline. Aye. |
|
The Clerk. Cicilline votes aye. |
|
Representative Bera? |
|
Mr. Bera. Yes. |
|
The Clerk. Bera votes aye. |
|
Representative Castro? |
|
Castro? |
|
[No response.] |
|
The Clerk. Representative Titus? |
|
Ms. Titus. Aye. |
|
The Clerk. Titus votes aye. |
|
Representative Lieu? |
|
Mr. Lieu. Aye. |
|
The Clerk. Lieu votes aye. |
|
Representative Wild? |
|
Ms. Wild. Aye. |
|
The Clerk. Wild votes aye. |
|
Representative Phillips? |
|
Mr. Phillips. Aye. |
|
The Clerk. Phillips votes aye. |
|
Representative Allred? |
|
Mr. Allred. Aye. |
|
The Clerk. Allred votes aye. |
|
Representative Andy Kim? |
|
Kim? |
|
[No response.] |
|
The Clerk. Representative Jacobs? |
|
Ms. Jacobs. Aye. |
|
The Clerk. Jacobs votes aye. |
|
Representative Manning? |
|
Ms. Manning. Aye. |
|
The Clerk. Manning votes aye. |
|
Representative Cherfilus-McCormick? |
|
Mrs. Cherfilus-McCormick. Aye. |
|
The Clerk. Cherfilus-McCormick votes aye. |
|
Representative Stanton? |
|
Mr. Stanton. Aye. |
|
The Clerk. Stanton votes aye. |
|
Representative Dean? |
|
Ms. Dean. Aye. |
|
The Clerk. Dean votes aye. |
|
Representative Moskowitz? |
|
Mr. Moskowitz. Aye. |
|
The Clerk. Moskowitz votes aye. |
|
Representative Jonathan Jackson? |
|
Mr. Jackson of Illinois. Aye. |
|
The Clerk. Jackson votes aye. |
|
Representative Kamlager-Dove? |
|
Ms. Kamlager-Dove. Si. |
|
The Clerk. Kamlager-Dove votes aye. |
|
Representative Costa? |
|
Costa? |
|
[No response.] |
|
The Clerk. Representative Crow? |
|
Mr. Crow. Aye. |
|
The Clerk. Crow votes aye. |
|
Representative Schneider? |
|
Mr. Schneider. Aye. |
|
The Clerk. Schneider votes aye. |
|
Mr. Chairman? |
|
Chairman McCaul. The chairman votes no. |
|
The Clerk. Mr. Chairman votes no. |
|
Chairman McCaul. Are there any other members in the room |
|
who wish to have their vote recorded? |
|
Are there any other members who wish to change their vote? |
|
The clerk will report the tally. |
|
The Clerk. On this vote the ayes are 20 and the noes are |
|
23. |
|
Chairman McCaul. The noes have it. The amendment is not |
|
agreed to. |
|
The committee postponed further proceedings on the recorded |
|
vote on amendment No. 7 offered by Representative Kamlager-Dove |
|
on which the noes had prevailed by voice vote. |
|
The question now occurs on agreeing to the amendment. The |
|
clerk will call the roll. |
|
The Clerk. Representative Smith? |
|
Smith? |
|
[No response.] |
|
The Clerk. Representative Wilson? |
|
Mr. Wilson. No. |
|
The Clerk. Wilson votes no. |
|
Representative Perry? |
|
Mr. Perry. No. |
|
The Clerk. Perry votes no. |
|
Representative Issa? |
|
Mr. Issa. No. |
|
The Clerk. Issa votes no. |
|
Representative Wagner? |
|
Wagner? |
|
[No response.] |
|
The Clerk. Representative Mast? |
|
Mr. Mast. No. |
|
The Clerk. Mast votes no. |
|
Representative Buck? |
|
Buck? |
|
[No response.] |
|
The Clerk. Representative Burchett? |
|
Mr. Burchett. No. |
|
The Clerk. Burchett votes no. |
|
Representative Green? |
|
Mr. Green. No. |
|
The Clerk. Green votes no. |
|
Representative Barr? |
|
Mr. Barr. No. |
|
The Clerk. Barr votes no. |
|
Representative Ronny Jackson? |
|
Jackson? |
|
[No response.] |
|
The Clerk. Representative Young Kim? |
|
Mrs. Kim of California. No. |
|
The Clerk. Kim votes no. |
|
Representative Salazar? |
|
Ms. Salazar. Salazar votes no. |
|
The Clerk. Salazar votes no. |
|
Representative Huizenga? |
|
Mr. Huizenga. No. |
|
The Clerk. Huizenga votes no. |
|
Representative Radewagen? |
|
Mrs. Radewagen. Nay. |
|
The Clerk. Representative Radewagen votes no. |
|
Representative Hill? |
|
Mr. Hill. No. |
|
The Clerk. Hill votes no. |
|
Representative Davidson? |
|
Mr. Davidson. No. |
|
The Clerk. Davidson votes no. |
|
Representative Baird? |
|
Mr. Baird. No. |
|
The Clerk. Baird votes no. |
|
Representative Waltz? |
|
Mr. Waltz. No. |
|
The Clerk. Waltz votes no. |
|
Representative Kean? |
|
Mr. Kean. No. |
|
The Clerk. Kean votes no. |
|
Representative Lawler? |
|
Mr. Lawler. No. |
|
The Clerk. Lawler votes no. |
|
Representative Mills? |
|
Mr. Mills. No. |
|
The Clerk. Mills votes no. |
|
Representative McCormick? |
|
Mr. McCormick. No. |
|
The Clerk. McCormick votes no. |
|
Representative Moran? |
|
Mr. Moran. No. |
|
The Clerk. Moran votes no. |
|
Representative James? |
|
Mr. James. No. |
|
The Clerk. James votes no. |
|
Representative Self? |
|
Mr. Self. No. |
|
The Clerk. Self votes no. |
|
Ranking Member Meeks? |
|
Mr. Meeks. Aye. |
|
The Clerk. Meeks votes aye. |
|
Representative Sherman? |
|
Mr. Sherman. Aye. |
|
The Clerk. Sherman votes aye. |
|
Representative Connolly? |
|
Mr. Connolly. Aye. |
|
The Clerk. Connolly votes aye. |
|
Representative Keating? |
|
Keating? |
|
[No response.] |
|
The Clerk. Representative Cicilline? |
|
Mr. Cicilline. Aye. |
|
The Clerk. Cicilline votes aye. |
|
Representative Bera? |
|
Mr. Bera. Yes. |
|
The Clerk. Bera votes aye. |
|
Representative Castro? |
|
Castro? |
|
[No response.] |
|
The Clerk. Representative Titus? |
|
Ms. Titus. Aye. |
|
The Clerk. Titus votes aye. |
|
Representative Lieu? |
|
Mr. Lieu. Aye. |
|
The Clerk. Lieu votes aye. |
|
Representative Wild? |
|
Ms. Wild. Aye. |
|
The Clerk. Wild votes aye. |
|
Representative Phillips? |
|
Mr. Phillips. Aye. |
|
The Clerk. Phillips votes aye. |
|
Representative Allred? |
|
Mr. Allred. Aye. |
|
The Clerk. Allred votes aye. |
|
Representative Andy Kim? |
|
Mr. Kim of New Jersey. Aye. |
|
The Clerk. Kim votes aye. |
|
Representative Jacobs? |
|
Ms. Jacobs. Aye. |
|
The Clerk. Jacobs votes aye. |
|
Representative Manning? |
|
Ms. Manning. Aye. |
|
The Clerk. Manning votes aye. |
|
Representative Cherfilus-McCormick? |
|
Mrs. Cherfilus-McCormick. Aye. |
|
The Clerk. Cherfilus-McCormick votes aye. |
|
Representative Stanton? |
|
Mr. Stanton. Aye. |
|
The Clerk. Stanton votes aye. |
|
Representative Dean? |
|
Ms. Dean. Aye. |
|
The Clerk. Dean votes aye. |
|
Representative Moskowitz? |
|
Mr. Moskowitz. No. |
|
The Clerk. Moskowitz votes no. |
|
Representative Jonathan Jackson? |
|
Mr. Jackson of Illinois. Aye. |
|
The Clerk. Representative Jackson votes no--aye. |
|
Representative Kamlager-Dove? |
|
Ms. Kamlager-Dove. Si. |
|
The Clerk. Kamlager-Dove votes aye. |
|
Representative Costa? |
|
Costa? |
|
[No response.] |
|
The Clerk. Representative Crow? |
|
Mr. Crow. Aye. |
|
The Clerk. Crow votes aye. |
|
Representative Schneider? |
|
Mr. Schneider. Aye. |
|
The Clerk. Schneider votes aye. |
|
Chairman McCaul. The chair votes no. |
|
The Clerk. Mr. Chairman votes no. |
|
Chairman McCaul. Are there any members in the room who wish |
|
to have their vote recorded? |
|
Any members who wish to change their vote? |
|
The clerk will report the tally. |
|
Mr. Smith is recognized. |
|
The Clerk. Representative Smith? |
|
Mr. Smith. I vote no. |
|
The Clerk. Representative Smith votes no. |
|
Chairman McCaul. Now the clerk will report the tally. |
|
The Clerk. On this vote the ayes are 20 and the noes are |
|
25. |
|
Chairman McCaul. The noes have it. The amendment is not |
|
agreed to. |
|
The committee postponed further proceedings on the recorded |
|
vote on amendment No. 6 offered by Representative Jackson on |
|
which the noes had prevailed by voice. |
|
The question now occurs on agreeing to the amendment. The |
|
clerk will call the roll. |
|
The Clerk. Representative Smith? |
|
Mr. Smith. No. |
|
The Clerk. Representative Smith votes no. |
|
Representative Wilson? |
|
Mr. Wilson. No. |
|
The Clerk. Wilson votes no. |
|
Representative Perry? |
|
Mr. Perry. No. |
|
The Clerk. Perry votes no. |
|
Representative Issa? |
|
Mr. Issa. No. |
|
The Clerk. Issa votes no. |
|
Representative Wagner? |
|
Wagner? |
|
[No response.] |
|
The Clerk. Representative Mast? |
|
Mr. Mast. No. |
|
The Clerk. Mast votes no. |
|
Representative Buck? |
|
Buck? |
|
[No response.] |
|
The Clerk. Representative Burchett? |
|
Mr. Burchett. No. |
|
The Clerk. Burchett votes no. |
|
Representative Green? |
|
Mr. Green. No. |
|
The Clerk. Green votes no. |
|
Representative Barr? |
|
Mr. Barr. No. |
|
The Clerk. Barr votes no. |
|
Representative Ronny Jackson? |
|
Jackson? |
|
[No response.] |
|
The Clerk. Representative Young Kim? |
|
Mrs. Kim of California. No. |
|
The Clerk. Kim votes no. |
|
Representative Salazar? |
|
Ms. Salazar. No. |
|
The Clerk. Salazar votes no. |
|
Representative Huizenga? |
|
Mr. Huizenga. No. |
|
The Clerk. Huizenga votes no. |
|
Representative Radewagen? |
|
Mrs. Radewagen. Nay. Nay. |
|
The Clerk. Representative Radewagen votes no. |
|
Representative Hill? |
|
Mr. Hill. No. |
|
The Clerk. Hill votes no. |
|
Representative Davidson? |
|
Mr. Davidson. No. |
|
The Clerk. Davidson votes no. |
|
Representative Baird? |
|
Mr. Baird. No. |
|
The Clerk. Baird votes no. |
|
Representative Waltz? |
|
Mr. Waltz. No. |
|
The Clerk. Waltz votes no. |
|
Representative Kean? |
|
Mr. Kean. No. |
|
The Clerk. Kean votes no. |
|
Representative Lawler? |
|
Mr. Lawler. No. |
|
The Clerk. Lawler votes no. |
|
Representative Mills? |
|
Mr. Mills. No. |
|
The Clerk. Mills votes no. |
|
Representative McCormick? |
|
Mr. McCormick. No. |
|
The Clerk. McCormick votes no. |
|
Representative Moran? |
|
Mr. Moran. No. |
|
The Clerk. Moran votes no. |
|
Representative James? |
|
Mr. James. No. |
|
The Clerk. James votes no. |
|
Representative Self? |
|
Mr. Self. No. |
|
The Clerk. Self votes no. |
|
Ranking Member Meeks? |
|
Mr. Meeks. Aye. |
|
The Clerk. Meeks votes aye. |
|
Representative Sherman? |
|
Mr. Sherman. Aye. |
|
The Clerk. Sherman votes aye. |
|
Representative Connolly? |
|
Mr. Connolly. Aye. |
|
The Clerk. Connolly votes aye. |
|
Representative Keating? |
|
Keating? |
|
[No response.] |
|
The Clerk. Representative Cicilline? |
|
Mr. Cicilline. Aye. |
|
The Clerk. Cicilline votes aye. |
|
Representative Bera? |
|
Mr. Bera. Yes. |
|
The Clerk. Bera votes aye. |
|
Representative Castro? |
|
Castro? |
|
[No response.] |
|
The Clerk. Representative Titus? |
|
Ms. Titus. Aye. |
|
The Clerk. Titus votes aye. |
|
Representative Lieu? |
|
Mr. Lieu. Aye. |
|
The Clerk. Lieu votes aye. |
|
Representative Wild? |
|
Ms. Wild. Aye. |
|
The Clerk. Wild votes aye. |
|
Representative Phillips? |
|
Mr. Phillips. Aye. |
|
The Clerk. Phillips votes aye. |
|
Representative Allred? |
|
Mr. Allred. Aye. |
|
The Clerk. Allred votes aye. |
|
Representative Andy Kim? |
|
Mr. Kim of New Jersey. Aye. |
|
The Clerk. Kim votes aye. |
|
Representative Jacobs? |
|
Ms. Jacobs. Aye. |
|
The Clerk. Jacobs votes aye. |
|
Representative Manning? |
|
Ms. Manning. Aye. |
|
The Clerk. Manning votes aye. |
|
Representative Cherfilus-McCormick? |
|
Mrs. Cherfilus-McCormick. Aye. |
|
The Clerk. Cherfilus-McCormick votes aye. |
|
Representative Stanton? |
|
Mr. Stanton. Aye. |
|
The Clerk. Stanton votes aye. |
|
Representative Dean? |
|
Ms. Dean. Aye. |
|
The Clerk. Dean votes aye. |
|
Representative Moskowitz? |
|
Mr. Moskowitz. Aye. |
|
The Clerk. Moskowitz votes aye. |
|
Representative Jonathan Jackson? |
|
Mr. Jackson of Illinois. Aye. |
|
The Clerk. Jackson votes aye. |
|
Representative Kamlager-Dove? |
|
Ms. Kamlager-Dove. Aye. |
|
The Clerk. Kamlager-Dove votes aye. |
|
Representative Costa? |
|
Costa? |
|
[No response.] |
|
The Clerk. Representative Crow? |
|
Mr. Crow. Aye. |
|
The Clerk. Crow votes aye. |
|
Representative Schneider? |
|
Mr. Schneider. Aye. |
|
The Clerk. Schneider votes aye. |
|
Mr. Chairman? |
|
Chairman McCaul. The chairman votes no. |
|
The Clerk. Mr. Chairman votes no. |
|
Chairman McCaul. Are there any other members in the room |
|
who wish to have their vote recorded? |
|
Any members who wish to change their vote? |
|
The clerk will report the tally. |
|
The Clerk. On this vote the ayes are 21 and the noes are |
|
24. |
|
Chairman McCaul. The noes have it and the amendment is not |
|
agreed to. |
|
There being no further amendments to dispense with, I move |
|
that the committee report H.R. 314 to the House with a |
|
favorable recommendation. |
|
All those in favor, signify by saying aye. |
|
All those opposed, signify by saying no. |
|
In the opinion of the chair, the ayes have it and the |
|
motion is agreed to. |
|
Mr. Meeks. Mr. Chairman, I've got ask for a roll call vote. |
|
Chairman McCaul. A recorded vote has been requested. The |
|
clerk will call the roll. |
|
The Clerk. Representative Smith? |
|
Mr. Smith. Aye. |
|
The Clerk. Smith votes aye. |
|
Representative Wilson? |
|
Mr. Wilson. Aye. |
|
The Clerk. Wilson votes aye. |
|
Representative Perry? |
|
Mr. Perry. Aye. |
|
The Clerk. Perry votes aye. |
|
Representative Issa? |
|
Mr. Issa. Aye. |
|
The Clerk. Issa votes aye. |
|
Representative Wagner? |
|
Wagner? |
|
[No response.] |
|
The Clerk. Representative Mast? |
|
Mr. Mast. Aye. |
|
The Clerk. Mast votes aye. |
|
Representative Buck? |
|
Buck? |
|
[No response.] |
|
The Clerk. Representative Burchett? |
|
Mr. Burchett. Aye. |
|
The Clerk. Burchett votes aye. |
|
Representative Green? |
|
Mr. Green. Aye. |
|
The Clerk. Green votes aye. |
|
Representative Barr? |
|
Mr. Barr. Aye. |
|
The Clerk. Barr votes aye. |
|
Representative Ronny Jackson? |
|
Jackson? |
|
[No response.] |
|
The Clerk. Representative Young Kim? |
|
Mrs. Kim of California. Aye. |
|
The Clerk. Kim votes aye. |
|
Representative Salazar? |
|
Ms. Salazar. Aye. |
|
The Clerk. Salazar votes aye. |
|
Representative Huizenga? |
|
Mr. Huizenga. Aye. |
|
The Clerk. Huizenga votes aye. |
|
Representative Radewagen? |
|
Mrs. Radewagen. Aye. |
|
The Clerk. Representative Radewagen votes aye. |
|
Representative Hill? |
|
Mr. Hill. Aye. |
|
The Clerk. Hill votes aye. |
|
Representative Davidson? |
|
Davidson? |
|
Mr. Davidson. Aye. |
|
The Clerk. Davidson votes aye. |
|
Representative Baird? |
|
Mr. Baird. Aye. |
|
The Clerk. Baird votes aye. |
|
Representative Waltz? |
|
Mr. Waltz. Aye. |
|
The Clerk. Representative Waltz votes aye. |
|
Representative Kean? |
|
Mr. Kean. Yes. |
|
The Clerk. Kean votes aye. |
|
Representative Lawler? |
|
Mr. Lawler. Aye. |
|
The Clerk. Lawler votes aye. |
|
Representative Mills? |
|
Mr. Mills. Aye. |
|
The Clerk. Mills votes aye. |
|
Representative McCormick? |
|
Mr. McCormick. Aye. |
|
The Clerk. McCormick votes aye. |
|
Representative Moran? |
|
Mr. Moran. Aye. |
|
The Clerk. Moran votes aye. |
|
Representative James? |
|
Mr. James. Aye. |
|
The Clerk. James votes aye. |
|
Representative Self? |
|
Mr. Self. Aye. |
|
The Clerk. Self votes aye. |
|
Ranking Member Meeks? |
|
Mr. Meeks. No. |
|
The Clerk. Ranking Member Meeks votes no. |
|
Representative Sherman? |
|
Mr. Sherman. No. |
|
The Clerk. Sherman votes no. |
|
Representative Connolly? |
|
Mr. Connolly. Nay. |
|
The Clerk. Connolly votes no. |
|
Representative Keating? |
|
Keating? |
|
[No response.] |
|
The Clerk. Representative Cicilline? |
|
Mr. Cicilline. No. |
|
The Clerk. Cicilline votes no. |
|
Representative Bera? |
|
Mr. Bera. No. |
|
The Clerk. Bera votes no. |
|
Representative Castro? |
|
Castro? |
|
[No response.] |
|
The Clerk. Representative Titus? |
|
Ms. Titus. No. |
|
The Clerk. Titus votes no. |
|
Representative Lieu? |
|
Mr. Lieu. No. |
|
The Clerk. Lieu votes no. |
|
Representative Wild? |
|
Ms. Wild. No. |
|
The Clerk. Wild votes no. |
|
Representative Phillips? |
|
Mr. Phillips. No. |
|
The Clerk. Phillips votes no. |
|
Representative Allred? |
|
Mr. Allred. No. |
|
The Clerk. Allred votes no. |
|
Representative Kim? |
|
Mr. Kim of New Jersey. No. |
|
The Clerk. Kim votes no. |
|
Representative Jacobs? |
|
Ms. Jacobs. No. |
|
The Clerk. Jacobs votes no. |
|
Representative Manning? |
|
Ms. Manning. No. |
|
The Clerk. Manning votes no. |
|
Representative Cherfilus-McCormick? |
|
Mrs. Cherfilus-McCormick. No. |
|
The Clerk. Cherfilus-McCormick votes no. |
|
Representative Stanton? |
|
Mr. Stanton. No. |
|
The Clerk. Stanton votes no. |
|
Representative Dean? |
|
Ms. Dean. No. |
|
The Clerk. Dean votes no. |
|
Representative Moskowitz? |
|
Mr. Moskowitz. Yes. |
|
The Clerk. Moskowitz votes aye. |
|
Representative Jonathan Jackson? |
|
Mr. Jackson of Illinois. No. |
|
The Clerk. Jackson votes no. |
|
Representative Kamlager-Dove? |
|
Ms. Kamlager-Dove. No. |
|
The Clerk. Kamlager-Dove votes no. |
|
Representative Costa? |
|
Costa? |
|
[No response.] |
|
The Clerk. Representative Crow? |
|
Mr. Crow. No. |
|
The Clerk. Crow votes no. |
|
Representative Schneider? |
|
Mr. Schneider. No. |
|
The Clerk. Schneider votes no. |
|
Mr. Chairman? |
|
Chairman McCaul. The chairman votes aye. |
|
The Clerk. Mr. Chairman votes aye. |
|
Chairman McCaul. Have all members voted? |
|
Does any member wish to change their vote? |
|
The clerk will report the tally. |
|
The Clerk. On this vote the ayes are 25 and the noes are |
|
20. |
|
Chairman McCaul. In the opinion of the chair the ayes have |
|
it and the motion is agreed to. |
|
Without objection, the motion to reconsider is laid on the |
|
table and staff is authorized to make any technical and |
|
conforming changes. |
|
This concludes consideration of the measures noticed by the |
|
committee for today. I want to thank all the members. |
|
There being no further business to transact, the committee |
|
stands adjourned. |
|
[Whereupon, at 12:26 p.m., the committee was adjourned.] |
|
|
|
[GRAPHIC(S) NOT AVAILABLE IN TIFF FORMAT] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
[all] |
|
</pre></body></html> |
|
|