|
<html> |
|
<title> - THE BOND PRICE COMPETITION IMPROVEMENT ACT OF 1999</title> |
|
<body><pre> |
|
[House Hearing, 106 Congress] |
|
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
THE BOND PRICE COMPETITION IMPROVEMENT ACT OF 1999 |
|
|
|
======================================================================= |
|
|
|
HEARING |
|
|
|
before the |
|
|
|
SUBCOMMITTEE ON |
|
FINANCE AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS |
|
|
|
of the |
|
|
|
COMMITTEE ON COMMERCE |
|
HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES |
|
|
|
ONE HUNDRED SIXTH CONGRESS |
|
|
|
FIRST SESSION |
|
|
|
__________ |
|
|
|
MARCH 18, 1999 |
|
|
|
__________ |
|
|
|
Serial No. 106-8 |
|
|
|
__________ |
|
|
|
Printed for the use of the Committee on Commerce |
|
|
|
|
|
<snowflake> |
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE |
|
55-636CC WASHINGTON : 1999 |
|
------------------------------------------------------------------------------ |
|
For sale by the U.S. Government Printing Office |
|
Superintendent of Documents, Congressional Sales Office, Washington, DC 20402 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
COMMITTEE ON COMMERCE |
|
|
|
TOM BLILEY, Virginia, Chairman |
|
|
|
W.J. ``BILLY'' TAUZIN, Louisiana JOHN D. DINGELL, Michigan |
|
MICHAEL G. OXLEY, Ohio HENRY A. WAXMAN, California |
|
MICHAEL BILIRAKIS, Florida EDWARD J. MARKEY, Massachusetts |
|
JOE BARTON, Texas RALPH M. HALL, Texas |
|
FRED UPTON, Michigan RICK BOUCHER, Virginia |
|
CLIFF STEARNS, Florida EDOLPHUS TOWNS, New York |
|
PAUL E. GILLMOR, Ohio FRANK PALLONE, Jr., New Jersey |
|
Vice Chairman SHERROD BROWN, Ohio |
|
JAMES C. GREENWOOD, Pennsylvania BART GORDON, Tennessee |
|
CHRISTOPHER COX, California PETER DEUTSCH, Florida |
|
NATHAN DEAL, Georgia BOBBY L. RUSH, Illinois |
|
STEVE LARGENT, Oklahoma ANNA G. ESHOO, California |
|
RICHARD BURR, North Carolina RON KLINK, Pennsylvania |
|
BRIAN P. BILBRAY, California BART STUPAK, Michigan |
|
ED WHITFIELD, Kentucky ELIOT L. ENGEL, New York |
|
GREG GANSKE, Iowa THOMAS C. SAWYER, Ohio |
|
CHARLIE NORWOOD, Georgia ALBERT R. WYNN, Maryland |
|
TOM A. COBURN, Oklahoma GENE GREEN, Texas |
|
RICK LAZIO, New York KAREN McCARTHY, Missouri |
|
BARBARA CUBIN, Wyoming TED STRICKLAND, Ohio |
|
JAMES E. ROGAN, California DIANA DeGETTE, Colorado |
|
JOHN SHIMKUS, Illinois THOMAS M. BARRETT, Wisconsin |
|
HEATHER WILSON, New Mexico BILL LUTHER, Minnesota |
|
JOHN B. SHADEGG, Arizona LOIS CAPPS, California |
|
CHARLES W. ``CHIP'' PICKERING, |
|
Mississippi |
|
VITO FOSSELLA, New York |
|
ROY BLUNT, Missouri |
|
ED BRYANT, Tennessee |
|
ROBERT L. EHRLICH, Jr., Maryland |
|
|
|
James E. Derderian, Chief of Staff |
|
James D. Barnette, General Counsel |
|
Reid P.F. Stuntz, Minority Staff Director and Chief Counsel |
|
|
|
______ |
|
|
|
Subcommittee on Finance and Hazardous Materials |
|
|
|
MICHAEL G. OXLEY, Ohio, Chairman |
|
|
|
W.J. ``BILLY'' TAUZIN, Louisiana EDOLPHUS TOWNS, New York |
|
Vice Chairman PETER DEUTSCH, Florida |
|
PAUL E. GILLMOR, Ohio BART STUPAK, Michigan |
|
JAMES C. GREENWOOD, Pennsylvania ELIOT L. ENGEL, New York |
|
CHRISTOPHER COX, California DIANA DeGETTE, Colorado |
|
STEVE LARGENT, Oklahoma THOMAS M. BARRETT, Wisconsin |
|
BRIAN P. BILBRAY, California BILL LUTHER, Minnesota |
|
GREG GANSKE, Iowa LOIS CAPPS, California |
|
RICK LAZIO, New York EDWARD J. MARKEY, Massachusetts |
|
JOHN SHIMKUS, Illinois RALPH M. HALL, Texas |
|
HEATHER WILSON, New Mexico FRANK PALLONE, Jr., New Jersey |
|
JOHN B. SHADEGG, Arizona BOBBY L. RUSH, Illinois |
|
VITO FOSSELLA, New York JOHN D. DINGELL, Michigan, |
|
ROY BLUNT, Missouri (Ex Officio) |
|
ROBERT L. EHRLICH, Jr., Maryland |
|
TOM BLILEY, Virginia, |
|
(Ex Officio) |
|
|
|
(ii) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
C O N T E N T S |
|
|
|
__________ |
|
Page |
|
|
|
Testimony of: |
|
Campell, J. Patrick, Chief Operating Officer and Executive |
|
Vice President, National Association of Securities Dealers, |
|
Inc........................................................ 21 |
|
Green, Micah S., Executive Vice President, the Bond Market |
|
Association................................................ 27 |
|
Levitt, Hon. Arthur, Chairman; accompanied by Robert L.D. |
|
Colby, Deputy Director, Division of Market Regulation, |
|
Securities and Exchange Commission......................... 7 |
|
|
|
(iii) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
THE BOND PRICE COMPETITION IMPROVEMENT ACT OF 1999 |
|
|
|
---------- |
|
|
|
|
|
THURSDAY, MARCH 18, 1999 |
|
|
|
House of Representatives, |
|
Committee on Commerce, |
|
Subcommittee on Finance and Hazardous Materials, |
|
Washington, DC. |
|
The subcommittee met, pursuant to notice, at 11:07 a.m., in |
|
room 2322, Rayburn House Office Building, Hon. Michael Oxley |
|
(chairman) presiding. |
|
Members present: Representatives Oxley, Ganske, Lazio, |
|
Shimkus, Fossella, Blunt, Bliley (ex officio), Towns, Stupak, |
|
Engel, DeGette, Barrett, Luther, Capps, and Markey. |
|
Staff present: David Cavicke, majority counsel; Linda |
|
Dallas Rich, majority counsel; Brian McCullough, professional |
|
staff member; Robert Simison, legislative clerk; Consulea |
|
Washington, minority counsel. |
|
Mr. Oxley. The subcommittee will come to order. The Chair |
|
would like to recognize the chairman of the full Commerce |
|
Committee, the gentleman from Richmond, Mr. Bliley for an |
|
opening statement. |
|
Chairman Bliley. I thank the chairman, the members of the |
|
committee, and the people who will testify. I'm very happy to |
|
see a good friend, Mr. Levitt, the Chairman of the SEC. I |
|
unfortunately have to be in two places at one time, which is a |
|
difficult thing to do at best. But, we have a hearing on |
|
electricity restructuring at 11 a.m. down in 2123, so I'll have |
|
to shuttle back and forth. |
|
In the 105th Congress, the committee conducted an inquiry |
|
into the U.S. bond markets and we learned three things. First, |
|
the bond market in the United States is huge. The ability of |
|
trading of Government securities exceeds $300 billion; daily |
|
trading of corporate debt, about $15 billion; the daily trading |
|
in municipal bonds about $9 billion. In comparison, the average |
|
daily value of stock traded on the New York Stock Exchange is |
|
about $25 billion. |
|
Second, the bond market offers a way for companies and |
|
cities to raise money with interest rates more favorable than |
|
those offered by banks. To the extent that companies and cities |
|
use the bond market, their cost of capital will be lower. They |
|
will be more competitive and they will save taxpayer's money. |
|
Indeed, today, in the Wall Street Journal, there's an article |
|
that AT&T may be about to raise somewhere between $6 and $8 |
|
billion in the bond market by themselves. |
|
Third, the level of transparency in parts of the bond |
|
market is poor. Transparency needs the ability of someone |
|
buying a bond to know the price at which the bond is trading. |
|
When people buy cars or furniture, they often comparison shop |
|
and make decisions based on price. For many investors in bonds, |
|
this comparison shopping is not possible. We heard testimony in |
|
September that two investors buying the same bond at the same |
|
time from the same dealer can be given very different prices, |
|
prices differing by as much 6 percent, a full year's worth of |
|
interest. |
|
I believe this situation is unacceptable. We have received |
|
a study from a professor at Purdue and an economist at the |
|
Federal Reserve that indicates that improved transparency will |
|
reduce spreads and improve prices to investors in the bond |
|
market. I ask unanimous consent that that study be made a part |
|
of today's hearing record. |
|
Mr. Oxley. Without objection. |
|
[The study appears at pg. 42.] |
|
Chairman Bliley. Today, we will consider a committee draft |
|
of legislation designed to improve transparency in the bond |
|
market. It is simple legislation. It directs the SEC to adopt |
|
rules facilitating transparency in these markets with certain |
|
minimum standards in that rulemaking. The SEC will take |
|
comments from the affected parties and will come up with the |
|
best way to improve price competition in these markets. |
|
This is an important goal for our markets and investors. |
|
Anyone using the bond market to save for retirement or |
|
education will benefit from it. Each of the witnesses has |
|
worked cooperatively with the committee to develop this |
|
bipartisan legislation. I commend Chairman Oxley for holding |
|
this hearing and for working with me on this legislation. I |
|
also commend John Dingell, Ed Towns, and Ed Markey for their |
|
cooperation in the project. |
|
I urge all members to consider this important legislation. |
|
After the hearing, it will be revised based on the testimony we |
|
hear today. It will then be introduced. I ask all members to |
|
consider co-sponsoring this legislation with me, and I yield |
|
back to balance my time. And, again, thank you, Mr. Chairman. |
|
Mr. Oxley. I thank the chairman and appreciate his remarks. |
|
The Subcommittee on Finance and Hazardous Materials has |
|
developed a track record of legislative accomplishments in the |
|
last two Congresses, improving our financial markets through |
|
competition. Competition forces change and change produces |
|
efficiency. Our commitment to apply these principles to the |
|
financial markets has translated into tangible results that |
|
benefit investors, as well as businesses. |
|
Of the many accomplishments of which the subcommittee can |
|
be proud, the most notable recent examples include the decimal |
|
pricing initiative, the National Securities Market Improvement |
|
Act, reduction of stock transaction fees, and securities |
|
litigation reform legislation. The decimal pricing effort, |
|
although not fully implemented, had an immediate impact for |
|
investors and business, alike. |
|
When the Exchanges voluntarily moved to reduce the minimum |
|
increment for trading stocks from \1/8\th to \1/16\th, |
|
individual investors and institutional investors began saving |
|
money immediately. And with the addition of twice as many |
|
prices at which to buy or sell a stock, the markets have |
|
experienced greater volume. We obviously don't take credit for |
|
the robust market volume that we've experienced over the last 2 |
|
years, but there is sufficient evidence that the move has in no |
|
way harmed market liquidity. |
|
Our current effort to improve the transparency in the |
|
corporate bond market originates with the same philosophy: |
|
improve information, eliminate anti-competitive and regulatory |
|
barriers and greater competition will result to benefit all |
|
aspects of the markets. |
|
When this subcommittee first examined this issue last |
|
September, the consensus was that the corporate bond market was |
|
not as transparent as other segments of the bond market. We |
|
determined that the market for these bonds could become more |
|
transparent. The more that relevant price and yield information |
|
is available, the more competition will improve. This in turn |
|
will improve prices for people buying bonds, their pension |
|
funds, and their mutual funds. |
|
Chairman Bliley challenged the bond market participants to |
|
improve transparency of the bond market. They have responded |
|
well. On their own initiative, the private sector has devoted |
|
its own resources to develop a system to begin to shed more |
|
light on the corporate bond market. I understand that one of |
|
these initiatives is scheduled to be operational within the |
|
next 2 months. I commend them for their efforts. |
|
Today, we are going to examine legislation to buildupon |
|
this work. The SEC has possessed the authority since 1975 to |
|
facilitate price transparency in the bond markets. The |
|
committee draft being considered today instructs the SEC to use |
|
that authority to guarantee transparency in these markets. |
|
Additionally, the committee draft sets certain minimum |
|
standards for transparency in the corporate bond market and |
|
calls for a study of transparency in the municipal market. |
|
I commend Chairman Bliley for his leadership in this |
|
initiative. I also thank the witnesses for their constructive |
|
comments in the drafting process. I recognize Ed Towns, our |
|
ranking member, John Dingell, the ranking member of the full |
|
committee, and my friend from Massachusetts for their help and |
|
support of this legislation. We anticipate that the legislation |
|
will be refined on the basis of today's hearing and then |
|
introduced. I hope we will have the support of all members for |
|
this worthwhile legislation. |
|
That ends the Chair's opening statement and I now turn to |
|
the ranking member, the gentleman from New York, Mr. Towns. |
|
Mr. Towns. Thank you, very much, Mr. Chairman, for holding |
|
this hearing. I appreciate having the opportunity here from our |
|
distinguished witness on bond market transparency and the |
|
committee draft bill, the Bond Price Competition Improvement |
|
Act of 1999. |
|
In 1972, Don Riggins stated in his book, A View From the |
|
Street, that at present, Wall Street is hiding behind a |
|
protective pricing system. While it preaches free competition |
|
and free market, as I mentioned in a public speech, that is |
|
like catching Carrie Nation tickling in the basement. |
|
We say that competition is good for everyone. We base our |
|
investment advice on the competitive stance of economy we are |
|
analyzing. The price of a stock is set by the forces operative |
|
in the marketplace. Yet, we live with this anomaly of a fixed |
|
rate structure. We know there's exceptions to our own rules. |
|
Prices are arrived at by a study of cost and markup for |
|
profits. Prices change as cost rise or fall. And as the demand |
|
for the product of service changes, they react to new |
|
efficiencies, to inflationary or deflationary pressures. That's |
|
the creed. Wall Street must learn to live by it. So, I suggest |
|
that in stock trading, we crown the customer king. |
|
In the 1975 Act Amendment, Congress abolished fixed |
|
commission rates and mandated that the SEC facilitate a |
|
national market system inequities that included implementation |
|
of a composite tape and quotation system. Twenty-five years |
|
later, we have the most transparent, efficient, liquid, fair, |
|
and competitive securities market in the entire world. The |
|
customer is king. But not so in the bond markets. Wall Street |
|
largely still lives as an exception to its own rules. |
|
Mr. Chairman, I'm pleased that we are going to try to shed |
|
a little sunlight on those markets, as well. It is long, long, |
|
long overdue. In June of last year, the hearing on on-line |
|
trading, this subcommittee heard testimony from Mr. Fondren, |
|
that at present, no centralized exchange for bonds, current |
|
price information remains in the hands of a small group of |
|
insiders perpetuating a system that is both inefficient and |
|
unnecessarily costly. |
|
In September, Mr. Chairman, Mr. Levitt gave a speech, |
|
calling for increased price transparency in the corporate debt |
|
market, to help investors make better decisions and increase |
|
confidence in the fairness of the markets. At this |
|
subcommittee's gala September 29, 1998, Chairman Bliley issued |
|
a challenge to the SEC and to the bond market to get going and |
|
clean up this--clean this market up. I look forward to hearing |
|
their reports this morning on what progress has been made. Both |
|
contend, in their written statements, that they are uniquely |
|
qualified to develop the system for public dissemination of |
|
bond transaction information. But, I hope we are not being |
|
asked to anoint any one system at this point. It would seem |
|
that there is room for both, if not others, as well. |
|
I understand that the draft bill was not finished in time |
|
for the witnesses to include detailed comments on the draft in |
|
their testimony, and I understand that. So, I hope that the |
|
chairman will direct them to submit written comments and hold |
|
the record open for that purpose. I look forward to working |
|
with the chairman of the full committee and the chairman of the |
|
subcommittee. I salute you both for leadership. And, at this |
|
time, I would yield back and say to you that I look forward to |
|
working very closely with you in the days and months ahead. |
|
Mr. Oxley. I thank the gentleman for his opening statement. |
|
The gentleman from Iowa, Mr. Ganske. |
|
Mr. Ganske. Thanks, Mr. Chairman. I look forward to the |
|
testimony from Chairman Levitt and I yield back. |
|
Mr. Oxley. The gentlelady from Colorado, Ms. Degette. |
|
Ms. Degette. Thank you, Mr. Chairman, and thank you for |
|
having this hearing today. I, too, look forward to the |
|
introduction of the Bond Price Competition Improvement Act of |
|
1999. I think that there are three broad economic benefits that |
|
price transparency can bring to us. |
|
First of all, it can bolster investor protection by |
|
providing investors with better opportunities to monitor the |
|
behavior of the entities that make markets of secondary |
|
securities. Second, it can improve market liquidity by boosting |
|
investor market maker con- |
|
|
|
fidence in the market. Finally, it can enhance market |
|
efficiency by boosting a price discovery process of moving |
|
toward the optimal price for a particular security. |
|
With that, Mr. Chairman, I think there are great benefits. |
|
I would commend Mr. Levitt and others through their work in |
|
this area, as well as you. And I'm so eager to hear my |
|
colleague from Massachusetts comments, which I know are always |
|
wonderful. Usually, I have to follow him when I speak, so I'll |
|
yield back the balance of my time. |
|
Mr. Oxley. The gentlelady bravely yields back her time, and |
|
we now recognize the aforementioned gentleman from the Bay |
|
State. |
|
Mr. Markey. Thank you, Mr. Chairman, very much. And over |
|
the years, I've found that the single most difficult thing to |
|
actually have fun with is the bond market. |
|
By definition, it's dull. I mean, it's really dull. At |
|
least with class, you get a little bit attention. But, in the |
|
bond market, it's really--it's hard, you know. It's a hard |
|
thing to talk about. |
|
I'm so glad that we have our great Chairman of the |
|
Securities and Exchange Commission with us today; he's going to |
|
go down in the annals of the Securities and Exchange |
|
Commissions as one of the greats. If there's a Mount Rushmore, |
|
they'd be carving his picture out right now. He's at the top. |
|
So, we're very glad to have him here with us today, and you, as |
|
well, Mr. Colby. We thank you for coming. |
|
As you know, the Commerce Committee has had a long |
|
tradition of leadership in eliminating obstacles to the |
|
dissemination of market information to investors. It goes back |
|
a long, long way. The goal has always been to ensure that the |
|
public got market information. |
|
At the time that the 1975 Act passed, Congress added |
|
amendments to the Exchange Act, which directed the SEC to |
|
facilitate the creation of a national market system for |
|
qualified securities. When Congress enacted that legislation, |
|
it did not limit its application merely to stocks, but to all |
|
securities, including debt securities. In fact, the only type |
|
of securities that were not included were the so-called exempt |
|
securities, which had defined in the securities laws to include |
|
treasury bonds, government agency securities, and municipal |
|
securities. |
|
At the time this legislation passed, there were many in the |
|
broker-dealer community, who opposed it. But some 24 years |
|
later, the Dow Jones industrial average is pleased to top |
|
10,000 mark and all observers agree that our stock market are |
|
much more efficient and more liquid, in large part due to their |
|
increased transparency. |
|
Over the years the SEC has not made much use of the powers |
|
Congress granted to it in this area to bring transparency to |
|
the corporate bond market. A decade after passage of the |
|
National Market System legislation, this committee also became |
|
concerned about the inadequacy of price transparency in the |
|
government securities market. Those concerns ultimately led the |
|
committee to include in the Government Securities Act of 1986 a |
|
provision mandating a General Accounting Office study of the |
|
matter. The GAO's final report in 1990 called for Federal |
|
regulation of price transparency in the government bond market. |
|
Based upon this recommendation, I crafted legislation, which |
|
would have extended the SEC price transparency authority to the |
|
government market. |
|
But this provision had to be dropped from the final version |
|
of the Government Securities Act Amendments of 1993, due to the |
|
intense opposition of the government bond dealers. Instead, the |
|
committee mandated that the SEC include, in its annual report |
|
to Congress, a requirement that the SEC analyze the report on |
|
the nature and adequacy of price transparency in the government |
|
securities market, and on any remedial legislation needed to |
|
address any future deterioration in investor access to market |
|
information. I look forward to hearing from Chairman Levitt |
|
this morning regarding the SEC's administration of this |
|
reporting provision. |
|
But the principle reason we are meeting here today is to |
|
review new draft legislation, which would direct the SEC to use |
|
the authorities Congress granted it back in 1975, to issue |
|
rules within 12 months to improve price transparency in the |
|
corporate bond market. I support this initiative, because I |
|
believe that bond investors deserve to get full access to the |
|
type of market information that will better enable them to |
|
determine whether they are getting the best price for their buy |
|
and sell orders. |
|
I know that Chairman Levitt has already taken some |
|
preliminary steps to move the industry forward in this area and |
|
that, as a result of his leadership, the NASD is currently |
|
considering rule changes that would create transparency in |
|
audit trail systems for the corporate bond market. In addition, |
|
I understand that the Bond Market Association has also stepped |
|
in with a plan to make certain market information available. I |
|
welcome each of these initiatives and would suggest that the |
|
legislation we are reviewing today should be seen as |
|
complimenting these efforts. |
|
I look forward to the testimony of the Chairman and our |
|
other distinguished witnesses. And Mr. Chairman, I congratulate |
|
you on the vigor with which you are continuing to pursue your |
|
chairmanship, looking into areas in which we can move on a |
|
bipartisan manner, to ensure that the market works in a more |
|
transparent fashion. And I thank you. |
|
Mr. Oxley. I thank the gentleman from Massachusetts. And |
|
try, as he might, to make the bond issue a little more sexy, |
|
you failed just a little bit. |
|
But, that was a good try. It was kind of like Boston |
|
College trying to get into the NCAA tournament, but that's |
|
another story. |
|
The gentleman from Missouri. |
|
Mr. Blunt. Of course, the Southwest Missouri State Bears |
|
play Duke tomorrow in the NCAA and after that 30 point win on |
|
Tennessee, which was harder to predict than anything in the |
|
bond market, I think Mr. Chairman, I'll just listen today. |
|
Mr. Oxley. I thank the gentleman. The gentleman from Long |
|
Island. |
|
Mr. Lazio. Once again, thank you for your interest and |
|
commitment and drive on this. And although we've had some |
|
disagreements in the past, I can say now, I think you were more |
|
right than I was. I look forward to the rest of the hearing. |
|
Welcome, my witnesses. |
|
Mr. Oxley. Did the reporter get that down? |
|
The gentlelady from California. |
|
Ms. Capps. Thank you. Thank you, Mr. Chairman. I'm a new |
|
member to this Subcommittee on Finance and Hazardous Materials |
|
and I can't think of a more fitting introduction to the |
|
committee than to hear the testimony today from the Honorable |
|
Arthur Levitt and from Mr. Robert Colby. So, I look forward to |
|
your presentation. Thank you, very much. |
|
Mr. Oxley. Thank you and welcome to the subcommittee. The |
|
gentleman from the upper peninsula. |
|
Mr. Stupak. Thank you, Mr. Chairman. I'll pass on the |
|
opening statement and look forward to our witnesses. And thanks |
|
for holding this hearing. |
|
Mr. Oxley. I thank the gentleman. We now turn to our |
|
distinguished Chairman of the Securities and Exchange |
|
Commission. We appreciate, as usual, Chairman Levitt, your |
|
participation in this debate; and Mr. Colby, welcome, as well. |
|
We were honored to visit the SEC at your request. I think |
|
speaking from all the members and staff who attended, it was |
|
the most worthwhile opportunity to learn more about what goes |
|
on over there and to understand fully the major |
|
responsibilities that you have and that you've done so well in |
|
carrying out. So, thank you and you're welcome to begin any |
|
time. |
|
|
|
STATEMENTS OF HON. ARTHUR LEVITT, CHAIRMAN; AND ROBERT L.D. |
|
COLBY, DEPUTY DIRECTOR, DIVISION OF MARKET REGULATION, |
|
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION |
|
|
|
Mr. Levitt. Thank you, very much. I am accompanied by Bob |
|
Colby, who is the Deputy Director of the Division of Market |
|
Regulation and an absolutely essential component in dealing |
|
with the many complex issues that division deals with, in our |
|
effort to see to it that competition in our markets is both |
|
fierce and fair. |
|
Let me say at the outset that I support the draft bill, the |
|
Bond Price Competition Improvement Act of 1999, which directs |
|
the Commission to use its existing authority to bring |
|
transparency to the corporate debt market. By adding the weight |
|
of congressional action to that of the Commission, I think the |
|
bill sends a strong message throughout the marketplace as to |
|
the importance of this initiative. I know that your intent is |
|
not to constrain prompt Commission action in any way. There is |
|
a provision within the bill that we have some reservations |
|
about, but I know we're working closely with the committee |
|
staff to resolve that issue. |
|
Again, as I said in my speech last fall and previous |
|
testimony before this subcommittee, I think the time has come-- |
|
it's probably long overdue--to illuminate this needlessly dark |
|
corner of the Nation's capital markets. Clearly, the technology |
|
now exists to address this issue, to gather transaction prices, |
|
to distribute them, and probably most importantly to interpret |
|
them in a timely, accurate, and efficient fashion. |
|
Today, the bond market touches just about every aspect of |
|
our lives, from the cost of building schools and hospitals to |
|
corporate investments in plant and equipment. It impacts the |
|
assets of public and private pension funds, and it channels |
|
funds to mortgages, to car loans, and a whole universe of |
|
activities important in our day to day lives. |
|
The increase in the significance of the bond market is due, |
|
in part, to its absolutely phenomenal growth. Since 1990, |
|
corporate bond issuance has increased more than fourfold; and, |
|
for high yield bonds, more than tenfold. In effect, movements |
|
in the bond market represent a daily vote on the part of |
|
investors throughout the world, in terms of America's economy. |
|
As you see prices go up and down, it's nothing less than a |
|
reflection of that vote, which takes place minute by minute. |
|
With $2.4 trillion outstanding, the corporate debt market today |
|
is nearly twice the size of the municipal debt market and |
|
almost 70 percent as large as the outstanding treasury market. |
|
Yet, even in the light of this very impressive growth, the |
|
corporate debt market has failed to keep pace with the |
|
transparency improvements that have taken place in our other |
|
markets, including, as Mr. Markey noted, in the government and |
|
municipal bond markets. Some corporate bonds are traded by |
|
interdealer brokers. But transaction prices, even for |
|
interdealer transactions, are certainly not displayed, nor are |
|
they reported in an organized way. Other transactions are not |
|
even reported at all. And without a trading desk and a |
|
sophisticated research department, it's nearly impossible to |
|
gather and to interpret market data. |
|
Investors, who lack the resources at their disposal, are |
|
really left with incomplete information. And as far as I'm |
|
concerned, incomplete information leaves investors vulnerable. |
|
And that, I think, is unacceptable. Guesswork can never be a |
|
substitute for readily available pricing data. Because bond |
|
values are often closely related, the price of one bond can |
|
very often give us important information about other comparable |
|
bonds. And that's why I think comprehensive price transparency |
|
is so absolutely crucial. |
|
Last fall, the Commission asked the NASD to adopt |
|
transaction reporting rules for corporate debt and to develop |
|
systems to collect and redistribute transaction prices on an |
|
immediate basis. We, also, requested that the NASD create a |
|
data base of transactions and a surveillance program to better |
|
detect fraud in the corporate debt market. In response to that, |
|
the NASD has formed a committee of market participants. It's |
|
called the Bond Market Transparency Committee, and their |
|
mission is to develop an industry guided proposal that will |
|
increase price transparency and oversight for the corporate |
|
debt market. We expect to see this proposal before the end of |
|
the summer. It will, I hope, lead to transaction reporting for |
|
corporate debt, improving transparency as pricing data is |
|
distributed to the public. In addition, we expect that the |
|
NASD's efforts will lead to improved surveillance for the |
|
market. |
|
The Bond Market Association is also developing a proposal |
|
for collecting or disseminating transaction information from |
|
interdealer brokers, but only investment grade corporate debt |
|
securities up to now. A lot of the details of that proposal and |
|
its relationship with the NASD's initiative are still unclear. |
|
I absolutely welcome industry support for increased |
|
transparency. And I certainly commit to working closely with |
|
the Bond Market Association, as we look forward with our |
|
initiative. |
|
Today, market information moves at the speed of light. The |
|
availability of accurate information to ensure the long-term |
|
viability of our markets has never been more important. |
|
Transparency is more significant, more effective than almost |
|
any regulatory fix. The corporate debt market is certainly not |
|
immune from these realities. And without reform, I believe that |
|
its current strength cannot guarantee its future prominence in |
|
an increasingly, and fiercely, competitive global market. I'm |
|
encouraged by the progress that we have seen since last fall. |
|
I'm encouraged by a cooperative spirit in both the public and |
|
private sector that appears to characterize this initiative. |
|
A concensus is developing, and I believe that NASD and |
|
industry action will demonstrate that seeking timely and |
|
accurate pricing information is both feasible and practical. |
|
Transparency leads to fair, more efficient, and clearly more |
|
effective markets. That's in the interest of investors. It's in |
|
the interest of our markets, dealers, and our economy as a |
|
whole. |
|
I thank the committee. |
|
[The prepared statement of Hon. Arthur Levitt follows:] |
|
Prepared Statement of Hon. Arthur Levitt, Chairman, Securities and |
|
Exchange Commission |
|
Chairman Oxley, Representative Towns, and Members of the |
|
Subcommittee: Thank you for giving the Securities and Exchange |
|
Commission (``Commission'') the opportunity to present its views on an |
|
issue in which we are actively engaged--enhancing transparency in the |
|
United States debt market. Today, I'd like to focus on three topics: |
|
(1) how transparency promotes fairness and efficiency in the U.S. |
|
capital markets, and how regulatory surveillance bolsters investor |
|
confidence in those markets, (2) why we believe this is the right time |
|
for improved transparency in the corporate bond market, and (3) the |
|
progress that has been made in this area since the Fall of last year, |
|
when I testified before you about the need to improve corporate bond |
|
transparency. |
|
i. regulatory goals of enhanced transparency and market surveillance |
|
Transparency |
|
The Commission has long believed that transparency--the extent to |
|
which prices are visible and understandable to market participants-- |
|
plays a fundamental role in promoting the fairness and efficiency of |
|
U.S. capital markets. Despite differences between the debt and equity |
|
markets, the Commission believes that transparency is just as important |
|
for bonds as it is for stocks. Indeed, because the value of a bond is |
|
usually closely related to the value of other bonds, the price paid for |
|
one bond may be important information about the value of many other |
|
bonds. |
|
In order to make informed decisions, investors must know the prices |
|
recently paid for debt instruments generally, as well as for the |
|
specific bonds they hold or that are being offered in the market. |
|
Often, there are no recent market prices for the bonds an investor |
|
holds, and their value must be imputed from the prices of other bonds. |
|
Comprehensive price transparency is therefore critical to informed |
|
investment decisions. Informed investors, armed with accurate |
|
information, ensure that market prices represent fair values. And fair |
|
market prices, in turn, ensure that the markets perform their economic |
|
function of efficiently allocating capital resources. |
|
Because transparency increases the fairness and efficiency of |
|
markets and fosters investor confidence in those markets, it has the |
|
added benefit of encouraging greater participation by investors. This |
|
participation means more trading, more market liquidity, and perhaps |
|
even new business for bond dealers. Thus, we believe that a sound and |
|
sensible approach to bond market transparency will benefit almost |
|
everyone--investors, dealers, and the economy as a whole. |
|
The Commission has a long history of supporting price |
|
transparency. When Congress adopted the 1975 Securities Act Amendments, |
|
it gave the Commission substantially greater authority over quotation |
|
and transaction reporting. Since then, the Commission has pressed |
|
repeatedly for increased transparency in equity markets. Each time |
|
opponents have predicted doom, and each time the results have shown |
|
that more transparency leads only to more liquid and efficient markets. |
|
Recent experience in the debt markets has reinforced the Commission's |
|
belief in the benefits of price transparency. |
|
For example, in 1991, with encouragement from the Commission and |
|
Congress, the industry created GovPX, an electronic reporting system, |
|
to distribute real time quotes and transaction prices for U.S. Treasury |
|
securities. Treasury markets today exhibit an extraordinary combination |
|
of high liquidity and low transaction costs. Trading volume has |
|
increased from $111 billion per day in 1990 to $227 billion per day in |
|
1998, and the spreads for benchmark bonds <SUP>1</SUP> are near zero. |
|
--------------------------------------------------------------------------- |
|
\1\ Benchmark Treasury bonds are generally considered to be the |
|
most recent issues of two, five and 10 year Treasury notes, and the |
|
most recently issued 30 year Treasury bond. |
|
--------------------------------------------------------------------------- |
|
In 1995, again with the Commission's encouragement, the Municipal |
|
Securities Rulemaking Board (``MSRB'') began collecting the details of |
|
dealer-to-dealer transactions in the municipal bond market and |
|
distributing daily summary reports. In August of last year, with |
|
Commission approval, the daily reports were expanded to include |
|
customer trades as well as interdealer trades. Most recently, just last |
|
November, the Bond Market Association began offering daily summaries on |
|
its Internet Web site, making municipal bond prices for the previous |
|
day available for the first time to the general public. This new Web |
|
page received 17,000 hits in its first three weeks of operation, |
|
suggesting a high level of interest by the public. |
|
Although we view the MSRB transparency program as a successful |
|
effort, the full impact of transparency in the municipal market will |
|
not be clear until trade reporting is done on a real-time basis, which |
|
the MSRB has committed to do and which we continue to support. |
|
In retrospect, we believe the government and municipal securities |
|
market transparency initiatives demonstrate both the benefits of price |
|
transparency in the debt markets, and the wisdom of being sensitive to |
|
the specific qualities of each market. The Commission's corporate bond |
|
transparency initiative will be carried out in the same spirit, seeking |
|
to further transparency goals in a manner uniquely tailored to that |
|
market. |
|
Regulatory Surveillance |
|
Market surveillance, like transparency, is a fundamental means of |
|
promoting fairness and confidence in markets. In fact, the two go hand- |
|
in-hand. Transparency promotes fairness and efficiency by making |
|
essential information available to all market participants, assuring |
|
that market decisions are based on appropriate information. |
|
Surveillance efforts, in turn, are designed to promote fairness and |
|
investor confidence by detecting and preventing fraudulent practices, |
|
such as market manipulation, and other potential abuses. Surveillance |
|
and transparency efforts, in essence, unite to provide a comprehensive |
|
program for protecting investors and promoting the effectiveness of |
|
capital markets. |
|
Effective market surveillance systems require that comprehensive |
|
trade information be reported to regulators. This reported trade |
|
information is subsequently used to produce audit trails and other |
|
sophisticated market surveillance tools. The key to meaningful |
|
surveillance is regulatory access to comprehensive trading information, |
|
essentially the same information that is required for price |
|
transparency. |
|
Today, no regulator has routine access to transaction information |
|
for the broad universe of corporate bonds and preferred stocks. |
|
Consequently, there is no organized system for routine surveillance of |
|
trading in that market. Regulators must depend on examinations of |
|
broker-dealers, or react to complaints brought by investors, which are |
|
cumbersome tools. A system of comprehensive trade reporting will permit |
|
the creation of a regulatory database and appropriate tools for |
|
proactive supervision of the corporate debt markets. |
|
ii. importance of u.s. debt markets |
|
Recent Growth |
|
We encourage this focus on the corporate bond market now, because |
|
in recent years it has grown in importance, but not in openness. In |
|
1985 the corporate bond market, measured by outstanding debt, was |
|
smaller than the municipal bond market. Today, at $2.4 trillion |
|
outstanding, it is about $1 trillion larger than municipal debt. It is |
|
also about 70% as large as the outstanding Treasury debt. Corporate |
|
bond issuance has increased more than four fold since 1990, and for |
|
high yield bonds, more than ten fold. |
|
Corporate Bond Transparency |
|
Despite its unprecedented growth, however, the corporate debt |
|
market has failed to keep pace with transparency improvements in other |
|
markets, including the government and municipal bond markets. Timely |
|
and accurate pricing information on the broad spectrum of corporate |
|
bonds is not available to the public or even to mar- |
|
|
|
ket participants. Some corporate bonds are traded by interdealer |
|
brokers, but transaction prices, even for interdealer transactions, are |
|
not displayed or reported in an organized way. As a result, in order to |
|
obtain accurate valuations of corporate debt instruments, corporate |
|
bond market participants must have a trading desk and a research |
|
department with sophisticated analytical tools to gather and interpret |
|
market information. Generally these kinds of resources are available |
|
only to large broker-dealers and institutional investors. |
|
The time has come to illuminate this needlessly dark corner of the |
|
capital markets. The technology now exists to gather transaction |
|
prices, distribute them, and interpret them in a timely, accurate, and |
|
efficient manner. Developing such a mechanism seems the next logical |
|
step. |
|
iii. current initiative |
|
The initiative started last Fall to improve corporate debt |
|
transparency is moving forward. As we testified in September, we have |
|
asked the NASD to adopt transaction reporting rules for corporate debt, |
|
and to develop systems to collect and redistribute transaction prices |
|
on an immediate basis. We also requested that the NASD create a |
|
database of transactions and a surveillance program to better detect |
|
fraud in the corporate debt market. |
|
The NASD subsequently formed a committee of market participants-- |
|
the Bond Market Transparency Committee --to work toward an industry- |
|
guided solution that will increase price transparency and oversight for |
|
the corporate debt market. |
|
The NASD was asked to take on this initiative for two reasons. |
|
First, the NASD is the self-regulatory organization for the over-the- |
|
counter market, where almost all corporate debt transactions take |
|
place. While the NASD is already responsible for surveillance of this |
|
market, it generally lacks access to the market information needed to |
|
do so effectively. Second, the NASD already has in place much of the |
|
required infrastructure. For example, the NASD has a national network |
|
that collects transaction reports in Nasdaq and listed securities |
|
traded over-the-counter. It performs on-line comparison and |
|
reconciliation of those transactions, and redistributes the reported |
|
information to vendors and to the NASD's regulatory subsidiary, NASDR. |
|
We believe that much of this technology is adaptable to the corporate |
|
debt market and will obviate the need to ``reinvent the wheel.'' |
|
Finally, the NASD will be able to create systems that combine trade |
|
reporting and comparison that will further the industry's goal of T+1 |
|
settlement, which is also supported by the Commission. |
|
The NASD, and the industry committee it formed, are working toward |
|
a proposal for market transparency tailored to the unique features of |
|
the corporate bond market. We expect to see such a proposal before the |
|
end of the summer. We expect that the proposal will lead to transaction |
|
reporting for corporate debt that will improve transparency as pricing |
|
information is distributed to the public. Similarly, we expect that the |
|
NASD's efforts will also lead to improvements in its surveillance of |
|
the market. |
|
The Bond Market Association (``TBMA'') is also developing a |
|
proposal for collecting and disseminating transaction information from |
|
interdealer brokers, but only in investment grade corporate debt |
|
securities. While the details of that proposal and its relationship |
|
with the NASD's initiative are still unclear, we welcome industry |
|
support for increased transparency. We believe that TBMA's efforts |
|
will, at a minimum, demonstrate the feasibility of immediate price |
|
reporting in the corporate debt markets. |
|
iv. conclusion |
|
In conclusion, the Commission believes that we are making strides |
|
toward greater transparency for corporate bonds. Transparency is both |
|
feasible and practical, and it will lead to fairer, more efficient and |
|
more effective markets. Almost everyone will benefit--investors, |
|
dealers, and the economy as a whole. |
|
Thank you. I would be happy to respond to any questions you may |
|
have. |
|
|
|
Mr. Oxley. I thank the Chairman for his statement and I |
|
recognize myself for 5 minutes for questions. |
|
Let me begin by asking, Chairman Levitt, as you know, the |
|
SEC has had the authority to improve transparency in corporate |
|
debt since the 1975 Act. Why do you think over the years that |
|
that has not been pursued aggressively on the part of the SEC? |
|
Mr. Levitt. Well, it hasn't been for lack of interest. When |
|
I first came to the SEC, our top priority, at that point, was |
|
beginning to look at our debt markets, particularly our |
|
municipal markets, because we felt that, at that point in time, |
|
that market almost totally lacked transparency. But the vast |
|
number--the growing number of retail investors in that market |
|
were absolutely operating in the dark. It was almost like an |
|
oriental bazaar: individuals didn't know what they were buying, |
|
what they were paying, whether the bonds were rated or unrated. |
|
And there was a culture of pay to play, which characterized the |
|
way dealers got that business. So, we spent several years |
|
addressing that issue. |
|
But, it is clear from that time that our debt markets |
|
require additional attention. And I guess the shortest answer |
|
to your question would be in terms of priorities. We never felt |
|
that this was a low priority, but we felt that other issues |
|
really required our attention, at that point. And, frankly, the |
|
initiatives in the municipal market and the way the industry |
|
worked closely with us to attain our goals in that regard have |
|
set the stage for this initiative; I think it makes a concensus |
|
solution much more likely. And, although I share your desire to |
|
have attained this 5 or 6 years ago, I think we will attain it |
|
more comprehensively and more completely, at this time, as a |
|
result of a lot of the work that has been done in the past. |
|
Mr. Oxley. I appreciate that. Of course, 1975 was long |
|
before your tenure began anyway and, obviously, there was, even |
|
going back into the 1970's and into the 1980's, very little |
|
interest in this subject. I think probably other than Ed |
|
Markey, there was very little interest on the Hill, as well. We |
|
appreciate your efforts in working with us toward a better |
|
good. |
|
Mr. Chairman, should investors have to pay for market data |
|
on bonds? |
|
Mr. Levitt. This service is so important, such a |
|
significant benefit to investors, that we simply have to find a |
|
way to fund providing that service. And that means that various |
|
vendors, various dealers are going to have to account for some |
|
of the resources for providing that service. Now, as to whether |
|
investors pay directly, I mean, that's an open question, at |
|
this point. But, I think that it does have to be paid for and |
|
it does have to be provided. Now, I think there are resources |
|
in the community to provide that service. |
|
Mr. Oxley. Do you support giving investors bond prices at |
|
real time? There's some argument that doing so may affect |
|
liquidity. |
|
Mr. Levitt. I think that transparency is good for |
|
liquidity. I reject the notion that it is bad for liquidity. I |
|
think a market that is open, transparent, available to anyone |
|
who wants to access that market is a market that throughout the |
|
history of markets has attracted the greatest amount of |
|
interest. I believe that, while real time is a goal, it's |
|
certainly one that is realizable, and I am supportive of moving |
|
in that direction. |
|
Mr. Oxley. Do you support the increased transparency for |
|
bonds issued by government-sponsored entities, or should they |
|
be, because of very unique nature, be the only ones that |
|
shouldn't be required to provide more transparency? |
|
Mr. Levitt. I think we have to look very carefully at that. |
|
I think clearly what GovPX did for treasuries was something |
|
very important, in terms of public good. And certain aspects of |
|
the government market, I think, are attracting greater and |
|
greater public support and involvement. We have to consider |
|
that area, as we move forward. |
|
Mr. Oxley. Thank you. The gentleman from New York. |
|
Mr. Towns. Thank you, very much, Mr. Chairman. Chairman |
|
Levitt, on the next panel, the Bond Market Association will |
|
testify that an industry-sponsored solution is the best way to |
|
enhance transparency in the bond markets, but this market-based |
|
solution should be assessed before regulatory response is |
|
determined or mandated, and that the Association believes that |
|
legislation mandating regulatory action is unnecessary and |
|
unwanted, at this time. Do you agree or disagree with that? |
|
Mr. Levitt. You know, I think that industry solutions are |
|
always the ones that we try to be mindful of, and, wherever |
|
possible, the Commission works closely with the industry. It's |
|
an industry, after all, that I came out of and spent most of my |
|
life in. And, in general, I think the industry has a |
|
significant contribution to make, particularly in this area. |
|
But, the legislation doesn't obviate that fact. The legislation |
|
asks the Commission to more forward with its rulemaking process |
|
and covers areas that the industry solution does not presently |
|
address. |
|
The industry is dealing in the present iteration of that |
|
solution with highly rated, very liquid bonds. And I think, |
|
with retail investors moving into other aspects of the |
|
corporate debt market, we have to extend beyond that area. It's |
|
terribly important that we cover all areas. And I think it |
|
would be a mistake to hold up our approach in favor of waiting |
|
for the industry or, for that matter, holding up the industry |
|
to wait for us. We're going to move as quickly as we can. I |
|
hope that the industry will move with us. But, I think we both |
|
have the incentive, as a result of this legislation, to move |
|
expeditiously and get this behind us. |
|
Mr. Towns. Thank you. The committee draft includes language |
|
requiring the SEC to take into consideration the effectiveness |
|
of private sector initiatives. In your determination about |
|
whether rules or other actions are necessary, do you agree with |
|
the need for such an assessment? |
|
Mr. Levitt. I don't think that has to be placed in the |
|
legislation. I think if you trace the history of the |
|
Commission, in terms of its dealing with the industry that we |
|
regulate, our history shows that we work closely with them. |
|
We're not operating in a vacuum. I'm concerned that, the way |
|
that language is worded, it could indeed force us to wait for |
|
an industry solution. I think that should be left to our |
|
working with the industry and seeing to it that the two of us |
|
move as expeditiously as possible. |
|
I'm told that the language in its present form might be an |
|
impediment. And why place it there, unless you're fearful that |
|
we wouldn't do that? I would assure you that, as we always do, |
|
we will be consulting with all the parties and all our |
|
constituents that have an interest in this area. |
|
Mr. Towns. Well, I'm happy to know that you indicated you |
|
will be consulting and talking here, because I think that the |
|
chairman raised an issue, in terms of sort of who would pay for |
|
the service. And, of course, I think all these are issues that |
|
really have to be talked about a great deal before anybody can |
|
move forward. |
|
Mr. Levitt. Absolutely. |
|
Mr. Towns. At this time, I yield back, Mr. Chairman. |
|
Mr. Oxley. The gentleman yields back. The gentleman from |
|
Missouri. |
|
Mr. Blunt. Thank you, Mr. Chairman. Let me pursue that just |
|
a little bit more, Chairman Levitt. What about the idea of |
|
paying the market-based solution? Is there any reason that we |
|
should be concerned about the industry making a profit from |
|
market data? Is that going to dramatically impact, in your |
|
opinion, the wide access to that data? Do you think we ought to |
|
be thinking about that, as we craft this legislation? Or do you |
|
think that there likely is competition going to mean that the |
|
data is going to be available in an affordable and easy way? Or |
|
just talk to me a little bit more about that. |
|
Mr. Levitt. Well, this is part of an issue that goes far |
|
beyond this bill. This goes to the whole issue of how market |
|
data is gathered and disseminated, how it should be funded, who |
|
should fund it. |
|
I think we have to take a step back and analyze our whole |
|
regulatory system, which is predicated on the cooperative |
|
efforts of the self-regulatory organizations, the Commission, |
|
and private rights of action. Without all three of those |
|
bodies, I can say to you that we simply would not be able to |
|
protect investors, as effectively as the system has protected |
|
investors for the past 65 years. |
|
The self-regulatory organizations have established a |
|
substantial network of services that include testing, |
|
surveillance, and enforcement efforts. The NASD has built a |
|
very commendable and effective regulatory mechanism. And you |
|
have to ask yourselves what is the best method of paying for |
|
that. Clearly, their membership, through dues and fees and |
|
services, have to pay the bulk of it. And if we take away a |
|
substantial portion of the revenues from any of those entities, |
|
what would happen to them? |
|
When I was the Chairman of the American Stock Exchange, |
|
nearly 60 percent of our revenues came from providing data. |
|
Now, you may say to me, well, that's crazy. Who wants to run a |
|
business based upon that? That's not your mission. And I'd say |
|
I worried about it and worried about it a lot, because I felt |
|
that, if we ever came to the day when that source of revenue |
|
was not there, I didn't know what we could do. So, if you take |
|
away that money from one of the exchanges, clearly somebody, |
|
some institution, some entity is going to have to make up the |
|
difference. They'll have to develop other charges, and some |
|
subsequent SEC chairman will be sitting here answering the |
|
question of why do you allow those charges to be imposed upon |
|
this or that participant in the marketplace. |
|
I don't really know the answer to it. I understand that |
|
we're going to have hearings at some point on this subject. And |
|
I've written a letter to all of the institutions that provide |
|
this service, telling them that we are in the process of |
|
analyzing it and coming back with recommendations. And I'd like |
|
to complete this rather long winded response to your question |
|
by saying that we are addressing the issue, which is complex, |
|
and we look forward to work- |
|
|
|
ing closely with this committee, as we try to reach some |
|
reasonable conclusions. |
|
Mr. Blunt. Certainly, your experience at the American Stock |
|
Exchange would indicate that the industry providing data and |
|
providing it at a cost has worked effectively? |
|
Mr. Levitt. Yes. |
|
Mr. Blunt. The only other question I've got, just on the |
|
whole issue of implementation. I know that more than 20 years |
|
ago, the SEC was given authority to work to make corporate debt |
|
more transparent, has decided that wasn't necessary. This is, I |
|
think, a little more directed. But, more importantly, just for |
|
my view on this, you do think this is important and if we pass |
|
this legislation, would move toward the goal of transparency? |
|
Mr. Levitt. I absolutely commit to it. I commend the |
|
sponsors of this initiative. I think it's probably long |
|
overdue. And I commit to working closely with the committee and |
|
being sure that this is reality, as quickly as possible. |
|
Mr. Blunt. Thank you, Mr. Levitt. Thank you, Mr. Chairman. |
|
Mr. Oxley. I thank the gentleman. The gentlelady from |
|
Colorado. |
|
Ms. Degette. Thank you, Mr. Chairman. I'd like to follow |
|
up, Chairman Levitt, on an issue that Mr. Towns talked to you |
|
about, which was the industry's voluntary initiative to collect |
|
price data on certain bonds and they disseminate the data to |
|
the public and regulators. And you talked a little bit about |
|
that. I'd like to hone in a little bit more specifically and |
|
ask you to address two aspects of that. |
|
First of all, how effective do you think the industry can |
|
be, in monitoring itself, in collecting price data on |
|
investment corporate bonds from interdealers? |
|
And then a second and related question is that how do we |
|
know--and this might be a better question for the panel |
|
following it, except I have to leave, so I'll ask you to opine |
|
and then maybe when they testify, they can tell us--tell my |
|
staff or something. But my second question is how can you be |
|
confident that dealers will actually participate, in a |
|
meaningful way, in some kind of voluntary program? |
|
Mr. Levitt. Well, I think the industry is really capable of |
|
doing this. The Bond Market Association, which is coordinating |
|
the industry effort, is the same group that worked closely with |
|
the Commission, in our municipal initiative. And I think the |
|
genius of the creation of this bill, mandating the Commission |
|
to move forward on this, I think will really catalyze the |
|
industry to rapidly bring to closure their part of this and |
|
hopefully carry it beyond their present inclination. So, I |
|
think the combination will work very well. |
|
Ms. Degette. I thank you. I don't have any other questions. |
|
Mr. Oxley. Thank the gentlelady. The chairman of the full |
|
committee is recognized. |
|
Chairman Bliley. Just a couple of questions, Mr. Chairman. |
|
Information is a public good, so why should exchanges or |
|
dealers be able to cross subsidize other parts of their |
|
business to profits from market data? |
|
Mr. Levitt. Well, the providing of market data is something |
|
that has concerned the Commission, and, indeed, about 2 weeks |
|
ago, I sent a letter to all self-regulatory organizations that |
|
were providing that data. As I mentioned earlier in my |
|
testimony, that data represents a substantial part of the |
|
revenues of some of these institutions: 15 percent in the case |
|
of the New York Stock Exchange, a substantial part for the |
|
American Stock Exchange and the Pacific Stock Exchange. And we |
|
are studying this issue and going to come up with |
|
recommendations, as part of a much broader package. |
|
But, because the numbers involved are so considerable, we |
|
have to decide collectively with the self-regulatory |
|
organizations how they can fund themselves. If they don't get |
|
it from this source, where will they go to get those funds to |
|
provide the all important investor protections that they are |
|
providing? I mentioned before that we will work very closely |
|
with the committee, as we work through a study with the |
|
industry to determine what fair pricing would be and how that |
|
pricing is related to the actual cost of providing that |
|
information and what other sources of funding the industry can |
|
develop to see to it that they are viable institutions in doing |
|
their self-regulatory jobs. |
|
Chairman Bliley. Well, that's reassuring that you will have |
|
some guidelines, at least, to somewhat relate the cost of |
|
providing the information with the cost that they charge. |
|
Will improved transparency improve price competition among |
|
bond dealers? |
|
Mr. Levitt. I think it will. I think improved transparency |
|
creates the kinds of markets which will attract more and more |
|
public attention, and more transparency, I think, by virtue of |
|
competitive pressures, will improve pricing, as well. |
|
Chairman Bliley. Thank you, Mr. Chairman. And thank you, |
|
Mr. Chairman. I have no further questions. |
|
Mr. Oxley. I thank the gentleman. The gentleman from |
|
Michigan. |
|
Mr. Stupak. Thank you, Mr. Chairman. Just a question or |
|
two, Mr. Levitt. Maybe you could help us a little bit on the |
|
bill that's been introduced, and I know you said you support |
|
it. In plain English, could you help me out a little bit on |
|
page two? They go in there and they say, ``Action required, the |
|
Commission shall adopt rules and take such other actions.'' It |
|
goes on to say, ``To assure the prompt, accurate, reliable, and |
|
fair collection, processing, distribution, publication, |
|
transaction information, including the last sale data, with |
|
respect to covered debt securities, so that information is |
|
available to all exchange members, brokers, dealers, securities |
|
information processors, and other persons.'' |
|
And then they bracket it. And it's my understanding you |
|
have some concerns about the bracketed language in--from the |
|
brackets on line 19 to 24. Are you suggesting some alternative |
|
to the bracketed language? Can you break that down for me? |
|
Mr. Levitt. My concerns about that language are that it |
|
could be interpreted that the Commission would have to defer |
|
addressing this issue for a solution by the private sector. I |
|
mentioned before that, on any of our regulatory initiatives, we |
|
work very closely with the private sector. And I think all of |
|
us feel, judging by the statements that I've heard this |
|
morning, that this is something we should approach |
|
expeditiously. The private sector solutions that have been |
|
recommended thus far, I think, are commendable, move in the |
|
right direction, are not as comprehensive as we would like it, |
|
and are limited to only one part of the market. I believe that |
|
this initiative should carry to other parts of the market. |
|
Now, for instance, the high yield market, is part of the |
|
market that more and more retail investors are getting into. |
|
It's obviously a part of the market that holds greater risks |
|
than the other ends of the market. And, because of that, I |
|
think we've got to look very carefully at that. We can't leave |
|
the high yield market totally out in left field. |
|
So, I guess my feeling is that we will accomplish |
|
everything that is intended to be accomplished by this |
|
paragraph. But by casting it in stone, in a piece of |
|
legislation, I believe it defies our expediting the process. |
|
I'd like to ask Mr. Colby to comment on this, as well, if I |
|
might. |
|
Mr. Colby. Sure. We think the bill would be better without |
|
the paragraph included. If you decide to go forward---- |
|
Mr. Stupak. The bracketed part? |
|
Mr. Colby. That's right. |
|
Mr. Stupak. It would be better without the bracketed part? |
|
Mr. Colby. That's right, because it raises ambiguities and |
|
we think that it's something that we don't need in order to do |
|
the job we're planning to do, that we've said we would do. We |
|
have some language, if the committee decides to keep something |
|
similar to the bracheted language, that would reflect that. One |
|
of our goals is not just to create a data base, but it's also |
|
making sure that the market can be monitored. So, we need to |
|
take into account surveillance, and to be able to create a |
|
surveillance data base, as well. |
|
Mr. Stupak. And any suggested language you have, I'm sure, |
|
any member on this committee will be receptive, at least take a |
|
look at it. |
|
Can I ask you, Mr. Levitt, then, on page three, because you |
|
said you didn't want to leave anything out in left field, and |
|
page three, I think line five, starts, ``Covered debt |
|
securities.'' And they say, ``covered debt securities'' and |
|
then they say, ``exempted securities.'' So, what securities are |
|
carved out by the exempted securities and should they be and |
|
what securities might the SEC carve out by its grant of |
|
exempted authority? |
|
Mr. Colby. Exempted securities are treasury securities, |
|
agency securities issued by Fannie Mae, Freddi Mac, and others, |
|
and municipal securities. Municipal securities are covered by a |
|
separate scheme under the Act. Treasuries are typically covered |
|
by a separate scheme also. And agencies are covered, at this |
|
point, by page three of the bill. It's a technical issue--it |
|
may be covered by another provision. |
|
Mr. Stupak. Well, should they be carved out? Should they be |
|
accepted? |
|
Mr. Colby. For agency securities, the straight bonds that |
|
are issued by Fannie Mae and others are already covered very |
|
well by the existing GovPX system. What's left is mortgage pass |
|
through securities and collateralized mortgage obligations, |
|
which are quite complicated, in order to cover everything in |
|
this process. |
|
Mr. Stupak. Could I just ask him to follow up my second |
|
part of the question? Are there any securities that the SEC |
|
might want to see carved out? |
|
Mr. Colby. I believe the reason that this is written the |
|
way it is, is so that if, after consultation with the industry, |
|
there are securities that immediate disclosure creates problems |
|
for, this would give us the authority to carve those out. |
|
Mr. Stupak. Thank you. |
|
Mr. Oxley. The gentleman's time has expired. The gentleman |
|
from Statan Island. |
|
Mr. Fossella. No questions. |
|
Mr. Oxley. The gentleman from New York. |
|
Mr. Engel. Thank you, Mr. Chairman. How come you said |
|
Statan Island for him and you didn't say Bronx and Westchester |
|
for me? |
|
Mr. Oxley. I choked. I couldn't remember. |
|
Mr. Engel. Thank you. Chairman Levitt, first of all, let me |
|
say that--let me thank you for the job that you do and thank |
|
you for your accessibility. There has not been a time when I've |
|
called you that you haven't gotten back immediately, and I know |
|
every on the committee feels the same way. So, I wanted to just |
|
say that publicly, I really appreciate it. |
|
You spoke, in your testimony, you talked about corporate |
|
debt transparency. And I'm just wondering, is that where you |
|
see the most trouble or the most difficulty nowadays? Is it |
|
lack of transparency? Is it the corporate debt problem? |
|
Mr. Levitt. Well, if I began to assess priorities, in terms |
|
of what's going on in the markets, I'd have a pretty long list. |
|
But, almost every issue that would be on that list are issues |
|
that could be enhanced by virtue of increased transparency. And |
|
what this bill proposes to do is really an extension of what |
|
the Commission has embarked upon, in both the corporate and the |
|
municipal market, and is something that was directly and |
|
appropriately mandated in 1975. And the circumstance that more |
|
and more individuals are using our debt markets today than ever |
|
before in history makes this a particularly timely, appropriate |
|
step to take. |
|
Mr. Engel. Thank you. The Bond Market Association, it's |
|
concerned that the premature release of transaction information |
|
might inhibit the trading activity of vital market |
|
participants. Could you respond to those concerns and how this |
|
might affect the implementation of tools to improve market |
|
transparency? |
|
Mr. Levitt. Well, again, I remember from my own days in the |
|
industry, while the industry is enormously progressive, in |
|
terms of new products and new ways of funding our capital |
|
marketplace, the industry sometimes is reluctant to implement |
|
change, in terms of how they deal with the public. I believe |
|
that the industry is extremely progressive and the fact that |
|
they did such a superb job, in terms of our municipal markets, |
|
tells me that they are equally capable of doing the same job, |
|
with respect to our corporates. And I understand the |
|
reservations that they have, because this is bringing light to |
|
a market, which was clearly not as liquid as our equity |
|
markets, cannot be treated overnight in the same way that we |
|
treat our equity markets. |
|
But the goal is the same. The goal is greater |
|
understanding, greater transparency. Congress has appropriately |
|
recognized that goal and is mandating the Commission to come up |
|
with a solution, which I assure you will be sensitive to the |
|
industry, but most sen- |
|
|
|
sitive to the public interest. And I think that that sense of |
|
balance, between Congress, the private sector, and the public |
|
sector is exactly the way to go and the time to go there is |
|
now, not 6 months or a year from now. |
|
Mr. Engel. I think it was about 5 years ago, NASD |
|
introduced a fixed income pricing system to improve |
|
transparency in the high yield sector. How well has that |
|
worked? |
|
Mr. Levitt. I think it's worked extremely effectively for |
|
what it was meant to do. |
|
Mr. Engel. And the SEC's recommendations to NASD, how might |
|
that increase the timely dissemination of information? |
|
Mr. Levitt. I think what we've asked the NASD to do, |
|
essentially, is adopt rules, which require dealers to report |
|
all transactions in U.S. corporate bonds and preferred stocks |
|
to the NASD and to develop a system to redistribute that on a |
|
timely basis; and second, to create a data base of |
|
transactions, in both corporate bonds and preferred stock; and |
|
finally, and I think in some ways most importantly, to create a |
|
surveillance program to better detect fraud in this market, |
|
something that you simply can't do in the absence of taking the |
|
steps that you've asked us to take. And I think they are in the |
|
best position to do this. They are already geared up to move |
|
forward on this. I believe they have the resources and the |
|
experience, and I'm very comfortable having this done by a |
|
self-regulatory organization, rather than having government do |
|
it. |
|
Mr. Engel. Thank you, very much. |
|
Mr. Oxley. I thank the gentleman. The time has expired. The |
|
gentleman from Wisconsin, Mr. Barrett. |
|
Mr. Barrett. Thank you, Mr. Chairman. I just have a couple |
|
of quick questions. Is there anything specifically that you |
|
would like to see added to this measure? |
|
Mr. Levitt. Well, I think working together with the |
|
committee, the legislation appears to be thoughtful and |
|
sufficiently comprehensive to do the job I think it's intended |
|
to do. |
|
Mr. Barrett. In the ideal world, would there be any tools |
|
that you would want to have or do you feel that you have the |
|
tools necessary? |
|
Mr. Levitt. I think with respect to this particular |
|
initiative, it gives us the tools necessary to do the job. |
|
Mr. Barrett. I have no further questions. |
|
Mr. Oxley. I thank the gentleman. The gentleman from |
|
Massachusetts. |
|
Mr. Markey. Thank you, Mr. Chairman. Mr. Chairman, you said |
|
earlier that there were limitations to the Bond Market |
|
Association transparency initiative that necessitate SEC and |
|
NASD action. I'd like to explore those limitations further. |
|
First, isn't it true that the scope of the initiative is |
|
limited to investment grade debt? |
|
Mr. Levitt. With respect to the Bond Market Association, |
|
yes, that's correct. |
|
Mr. Markey. So, all the non-investment grade corporate |
|
bonds wouldn't even be covered? |
|
Mr. Levitt. That's correct. |
|
Mr. Markey. Isn't it also true that the industry initiative |
|
relies entirely upon voluntary participation? |
|
Mr. Levitt. That is correct. |
|
Mr. Markey. So, if an interdealer-broker doesn't volunteer |
|
to join the system, its trades wouldn't be displayed; is that |
|
right? |
|
Mr. Levitt. Yes. |
|
Mr. Markey. And a direct dealer to dealer or dealer to |
|
customer trade that doesn't use an interdealer-broker, who |
|
voluntarily joins the system also wouldn't be recorded; is that |
|
true? |
|
Mr. Levitt. That is correct. |
|
Mr. Markey. Now, I, also understand that the voluntary |
|
industry initiative would provide for hourly dissemination of |
|
summary price information. Wouldn't you agree that the value of |
|
price information decreases proportionately in time? |
|
Mr. Levitt. Yes. |
|
Mr. Markey. Wouldn't you, also, agree that in today's fast |
|
moving markets, hour old market data could prove pretty stale? |
|
Mr. Levitt. It would. |
|
Mr. Markey. The SEC has also called for full electronic |
|
audit trails for market surveillance purposes. Can you tell me |
|
why this is needed and how such information could assist the |
|
SEC and the NASD enforcement efforts? |
|
Mr. Levitt. Well, again, to the extent to which information |
|
is available, to the extent to which an audit trail is |
|
implemented, to the extent to which reporting is as broad as |
|
possible, that enables the NASD and the Commission to do their |
|
surveillance job much more comprehensively and accurately. And |
|
without that information--I think it's a question of how soon |
|
we get there. I think getting there overnight in a market, |
|
which is not analogous to our equity markets, for many reasons |
|
may not be possible. But I do believe that to say that we will |
|
take half measures indefinitely would be equally erroneous. |
|
And I'd like to ask Bob Colby to answer that question, as |
|
well. |
|
Mr. Colby. Right now, there is no comprehensive way to |
|
oversee activity in the corporate debt market. And if you |
|
wanted to know what's going on, you'd have to do an individual |
|
examination of each of the hundreds participating in that |
|
market. And this would allow them to look for problem trends |
|
and then focus examinations. |
|
Mr. Markey. Mr. Chairman, in your opening statement, you |
|
expressed some concern about bracketed language in the |
|
Chairman's draft, which would require the SEC to take into |
|
consideration private sector transparency efforts, as it |
|
considers adoption of new rules or other measures to bring more |
|
transparency to the corporate debt market. Should we delete |
|
this provision from the bill? |
|
Mr. Levitt. I would hope so. That would be my preferred |
|
recommendation. |
|
Mr. Markey. Now, I had read this language not as a |
|
limitation on the SEC's authority, but merely as a |
|
congressional suggestion that the SEC consider what was |
|
happening the industry, as it moved forward, but still leaves |
|
you entirely free to take whatever action you deem necessary in |
|
the public interest, all for the protection of investors. You |
|
don't interpret that language that way? |
|
Mr. Levitt. In the staff's analysis of that language, they |
|
felt that it did represent an impediment. And my feeling is, |
|
given the history of this, the fact that, as you pointed out so |
|
correctly, since 1975, the Commission has not taken this |
|
action, and since, as a matter of practice, we work very, very |
|
closely with the industry as we consider these issues, the very |
|
fact that you would give this directive, I think could serve as |
|
an impediment. |
|
On the other hand, by deleting the language, you certainly |
|
create a very strong incentive for all parties to move |
|
expeditiously to attain this goal. And if we're looking for an |
|
optimum solution, why not go for it, rather than taking a |
|
chance of putting anything in its way. |
|
Mr. Markey. Thank you, Mr. Chairman. Thank you, Mr. Colby, |
|
very much. |
|
Mr. Oxley. I thank the gentleman. If I could conclude, Mr. |
|
Chairman, by just asking one question. You had talked about |
|
fraud and obviously the necessity for targeting against fraud. |
|
Is there or do you have any evidence that fraud is any more |
|
prevalent in the bond market than in the equities market? |
|
Mr. Levitt. I think that, with respect to insider trading, |
|
the use of convertible bonds or certain other bond issues has |
|
become more of a factor, in terms of prevalence of fraud. I |
|
think to the extent to which bonds have become more and more |
|
attractive to retail investment, we have to consider that very, |
|
very carefully and seriously. And it's another reason why I |
|
welcome your initiative, at this time. |
|
Mr. Oxley. Has there been some enforcement actions in |
|
regard to those convertibles? |
|
Mr. Colby. I believe there have, but I'd have to check. |
|
Mr. Oxley. Thank you. Mr. Chairman, Mr. Colby, we thank |
|
you, again, for your participation and your leadership on this |
|
very important issue. |
|
Mr. Levitt. Thank you. |
|
Mr. Oxley. The Chair will call the second panel. The chair |
|
would recognize the second panel, Mr. Micah S. Green, the |
|
Executive Vice President for the Bond Market Association; and |
|
Mr. J. Patrick Campbell, Chief Operating Officer and Executive |
|
Vice President of the NASD Stock Market. Gentlemen, welcome to |
|
both of you. And we have no preferred order of appearance, so |
|
if you want to go alphabetically, that's fine with us. Mr. |
|
Campbell, welcome. |
|
|
|
STATEMENTS OF J. PATRICK CAMPELL, CHIEF OPERATING OFFICER AND |
|
EXECUTIVE VICE PRESIDENT, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF SECURITIES |
|
DEALERS, INC.; AND MICAH S. GREEN, EXECUTIVE VICE PRESIDENT, |
|
THE BOND MARKET ASSOCIATION |
|
|
|
Mr. Campbell. Thank you. The NASD supports the |
|
subcommittee's and the SEC's initiative to bring clearer price |
|
transparency, the extent to which timely data on prices is |
|
visible to all market participants to the bond markets, and |
|
wants to express our gratitude to you, Mr. Chairman, and to |
|
Chairman Bliley for your leadership in this area. While |
|
recognizing the contributions of other organizations, we |
|
continue to work with them for greater transparency. |
|
The NASD is uniquely situated to develop the systems and |
|
rules for the public dissemination of bond transaction |
|
information. These benefits stem from the NASD's self- |
|
regulatory status, its proven network, consistent capabilities, |
|
and its potential to provide comparison and settlement |
|
improvements to reduce systemic risk. The NASD is a self- |
|
regulatory organization under the 34 Securities Exchange Act. |
|
It is subject to direct SEC regulation and oversight, to ensure |
|
that it meets its obligations under that Act. Because no |
|
private organization is subject to the full ray of SEC |
|
oversight and review, the NASD is alone in its regulatory |
|
protections it provides among those seeking to improve bond |
|
market transparency. |
|
In addition to its SRO status, the NASD has developed the |
|
NASDAQ Stock Market into the world's premier electronic trading |
|
system, with the larger share volume of any market in the |
|
world. Its trade data are provided through one of the most |
|
extensive private networks in the world, which is being |
|
expanded. |
|
As part of that network, the NASD operates the automated |
|
confirmation transaction service, or ACT, which handles the |
|
post trade process for NASDAQ trade, and in a multi-dealer |
|
market similar to the current bond market structure. Among |
|
other things, ACT provides mandatory 90 second trade reporting, |
|
last sale dissemination, on-line trading comparison and |
|
reconciliation, risk management, real time regulatory |
|
oversight, and forwarding trades for clearing and settlement. |
|
ACT, as we have it today, thus could readily be adapted as a |
|
basis for bond reporting and trade comparison system that could |
|
provide both heightened oversight and reduced systemic risk. |
|
Since the SEC requested us to undertake this initiative in |
|
September of last year, the NASD has conducted extensive |
|
research on the depth and breadth of corporate market, reviewed |
|
reporting, surveillance elements, met with data vendors, |
|
clearing firms, and network display vendors. To pursue the |
|
initiative with all deliberate speed, the NASD has empaneled a |
|
bond market transparency committee, representing investors in |
|
all major segments of the bond market, to ensure that enhanced |
|
bond transparency is implemented appropriately and can be |
|
provided at the earliest possible time. We are proud of the |
|
wide representation that we have been able to obtain on this |
|
extremely important committee. Represented on it are individual |
|
investors, academia, institutional investors, major U.S. |
|
investment banking firms, large discount firms, regional |
|
investment banking firms, foreign-based investment banking |
|
firms, brokers, brokers, the Bond Market Association, the |
|
Securities Industry Association, and our own regulatory fixed |
|
income committee. |
|
Our committee has made substantial progress. The committee |
|
has agreed, in principle, as to the securities that should be |
|
included in the system, which now includes all registered debt |
|
securities in 144(a) securities. The committee will determine |
|
what will be disseminated and within what timeframe, to ensure |
|
maximum transparency, without disrupting markets and, |
|
consequently, harming liquidity. The committee has agreed that |
|
the NASD's automated confirmation transaction system will be an |
|
important tool for the confirmation of reported trades, |
|
especially as settlement cycles ultimately shorten the trade |
|
date plus one for settlement. The committee has also |
|
established that the information that it has collected should |
|
be widely disseminated to all vendors, to the maximum extent |
|
possible. |
|
The NASD is strongly supportive of the objectives and |
|
principles embodied in the Commerce draft of the Bond Price |
|
Competition Im- |
|
|
|
provement Act of 1999, and expresses its appreciation, too, Mr. |
|
Chairman, for your efforts in this important area. We |
|
particularly want to stress the importance of the provision in |
|
Section II of that bill, that expressly preserves all of the |
|
Commission's authority under Section 11(a). We believe that |
|
this provision is especially important in making it clear that |
|
the Commission has the authority to approve all the terms on |
|
which market information may be obtained and distribute, |
|
including the power to ensure that fees charged are fair, |
|
reasonable, and non-discriminatory. |
|
The NASD will work, as we have, with the SEC and the |
|
securities industry to make the necessary changes at the |
|
earliest possible time, with the maximum benefit to the |
|
investor and the minimum disruption to the industry. Thank you, |
|
Mr. Chairman. |
|
[The prepared statement of J. Patrick Campell follows:] |
|
Prepared Statement of J. Patrick Campbell, Chief Operating Officer, The |
|
Nasdaq Stock Market |
|
I am J. Patrick Campbell, Chief Operating Officer of the Nasdaq |
|
Stock Market, Inc. |
|
The NASD would like to thank the Subcommittee for this opportunity |
|
to testify again on bond market transparency and the changes needed to |
|
improve that transparency for investors and other market participants. |
|
It was my pleasure to testify before this Subcommittee last September |
|
29 and share with you our thoughts on bond market transparency. Since |
|
that testimony we have made significant progress, which I would like to |
|
describe today. I will also accept the Subcommittee's invitation to |
|
comment on its draft bill, the Bond Price Competition Improvement Act |
|
of 1999. |
|
the nasd |
|
Let me briefly outline the role of the NASD in the regulation and |
|
operation of our securities markets. Established under authority |
|
granted by the 1938 Maloney Act Amendments to the Securities Exchange |
|
Act of 1934, the NASD is the largest self-regulatory organization for |
|
the securities industry in the world. Virtually every broker-dealer in |
|
the U.S. that conducts a securities business with the public is |
|
required by law to be a member of the NASD. The NASD's membership |
|
comprises 5,600 securities firms that operate in excess of 70,000 |
|
branch offices and employ more than 590,000 registered securities |
|
professionals. |
|
The NASD is the parent company of The Nasdaq Stock Market, Inc, the |
|
American Stock Exchange, and NASD Regulation, Inc. (NASDR). These |
|
wholly-owned subsidiaries operate under delegated authority from the |
|
parent, which retains overall responsibility for ensuring that the |
|
organization's statutory and self-regulatory functions and obligations |
|
are fulfilled. The NASD is governed by a 27-member Board of Governors, |
|
a majority of whom are non-securities industry affiliated. Board |
|
members are drawn from leaders of industry, academia, and the public. |
|
Among many other responsibilities, the Board, through a series of |
|
standing and select committees, monitor trends in the industry and |
|
promulgate rules, guidelines, and policies to protect investors and |
|
ensure market integrity. |
|
The Nasdaq Stock Market |
|
In keeping with the NASD's mission of facilitating capital |
|
formation for the ultimate benefit of investors, the Nasdaq Stock |
|
Market develops and operates a variety of market systems and services. |
|
The Nasdaq Stock Market is the largest electronic, screen-based |
|
market in the world, capable of handling trading levels of at least one |
|
and a half billion shares a day. Founded in 1971, Nasdaq today accounts |
|
for more than one-half of all equity shares traded in the nation and is |
|
the second largest stock market in the world in terms of the dollar |
|
value of trading. It lists the securities of 5,100 domestic and foreign |
|
companies, more than all other U.S. stock markets combined. |
|
The American Stock Exchange |
|
As the nation's second largest floor-based exchange, the American |
|
Stock Exchange has a significant presence in both listed equities and |
|
equity derivative securities. It lists 770 companies, and is widely |
|
known for its development of successful new investment products. |
|
NASD Regulation |
|
NASD Regulation is responsible for the registration, education, |
|
testing, and examination of member firms and their employees. In |
|
addition, it oversees and regulates our members' market-making |
|
activities and trading practices in securities, including those that |
|
are listed on The Nasdaq Stock Market and those that are not listed on |
|
any exchange. |
|
NASDR carries out its mandate from its Washington headquarters and |
|
14 district offices located in major cities throughout the country. |
|
Through close cooperation with federal and state authorities and other |
|
self-regulators, overlap and duplication is minimized, freeing |
|
governmental resources to focus on other areas of securities |
|
regulation. |
|
NASDR has examination responsibilities for all of its 5,600 |
|
members. In addition to special cause investigations that address |
|
customer complaints and terminations of brokers for regulatory reasons, |
|
NASDR conducts a comprehensive routine cycle examination program. |
|
the bond and equity markets are different |
|
The NASD is well aware of the important differences between the |
|
debt and equity markets. These differences include: |
|
|
|
<bullet> Size--The bond markets are many times larger than the equity |
|
markets. For example, the combined equity trading on the Nasdaq |
|
Stock Market and New York Stock Exchange--the two most active |
|
markets in the world, based on dollar volume--totals $44 |
|
billion per day. The bond markets' total trading volume is |
|
approximately $350 billion per day, or eight times larger. |
|
<bullet> Number of bond issues--There are many more bond issues than |
|
stock issues. For example, about 15,000 stocks trade publicly |
|
on US stock markets, but there are more than one million bond |
|
issues outstanding. |
|
<bullet> Trading activity--Bonds trade most heavily in the first weeks |
|
after they come to market. After that time, they tend to be |
|
placed in portfolios by institutional and various retail |
|
accounts and held longer term. Equities tend to trade more |
|
frequently and are usually held for a shorter period of time. |
|
<bullet> Yield--In most areas of the debt market, bonds trade on yield |
|
rather than on dollar price and are valued in comparison to |
|
benchmark government securities. Bond trading relies on |
|
interest rates, inflation expectations, economic data, quality |
|
of debt, and the terms of the bond itself, more than on factors |
|
that are unique to the issuer. |
|
<bullet> Intermediaries--Certain sectors of the bond markets rely |
|
heavily on the role of the ``brokers' brokers.'' These |
|
intermediaries provide anonymity between bond dealers to avoid |
|
divulging their dealers' market positions. The brokers' brokers |
|
also provide dealers with information to give greater insight |
|
into current market situations. |
|
<bullet> Over the counter--About 90% of all bond trades take place in |
|
the over the counter market rather than on an exchange. |
|
<bullet> Transparency--As discussed below, corporate bond markets trade |
|
with less price transparency, that is, the extent to which |
|
timely data on prices is visible to all market participants. |
|
Although there are clear differences in the bond and equity |
|
markets, the NASD believes that there are principles that apply equally |
|
to both, such as the need for price transparency and effective |
|
regulation based on modern surveillance systems that examine actual |
|
trade data. |
|
the sec calls for transparency |
|
While public perception of the differences between the debt and |
|
equity markets has been growing slowly, SEC Chairman Levitt's September |
|
9, 1998 statement brought the problem with the lack of transparency in |
|
the bond markets clearly into the public's awareness. |
|
Chairman Levitt identified a clear need for corporate debt market |
|
price transparency, saying: |
|
``Investors have a right to know the prices at which bonds |
|
are being bought and sold. This will help them make better |
|
decisions, and it will increase confidence in the fairness of |
|
the markets. The sad truth is that investors in the corporate |
|
bond market do not enjoy the same access to information as a |
|
car buyer or a homebuyer or even a fruit buyer. And that's |
|
unacceptable. Guesswork can never be a substitute for readily |
|
available price data.'' |
|
Noting that the corporate debt market remains one of the last major |
|
US markets to not have some type of electronic price disclosure system, |
|
Chairman Levitt announced the NASD's agreement with the SEC to take |
|
several actions: |
|
|
|
<bullet> Propose rules requiring dealers to report all transactions in |
|
U.S. corporate bonds and preferred stocks to the NASD and |
|
develop systems to receive and redistribute transaction prices |
|
on an immediate basis; |
|
<bullet> Create a database of transactions in bonds and preferred |
|
stocks that will enable regulators to take a proactive role in |
|
supervising the corporate debt market, rather than only |
|
reacting to complaints brought by investors; and |
|
<bullet> Create, in conjunction with the development of a database, a |
|
surveillance program to better detect fraud to foster investor |
|
confidence in the fairness of these markets. |
|
We are committed to working with the SEC, the Subcommittee, and |
|
other parties to develop approaches to bring greater transparency to |
|
the bond markets. We believe that transparency is indispensable to |
|
market integrity, and we are confident that our efforts will provide |
|
greater transparency to the corporate bond market. |
|
nasd bond transparency benefits |
|
While recognizing the contributions of other organizations, and |
|
continuing to work with them for greater transparency, the NASD is |
|
uniquely situated to develop the systems and rules for the public |
|
dissemination of bond transaction information. These benefits stem from |
|
the NASD's SRO status, its proven network and systems capabilities, and |
|
its potential to provide comparison and settlement improvements to |
|
reduce systemic risk. |
|
SRO Status |
|
The NASD is a Self Regulatory Organization under the 1934 |
|
Securities Exchange Act. It is subject to direct SEC regulation and |
|
oversight to ensure that it meets its obligations under that Act. |
|
These obligations include: protection of investors and the public |
|
interest; promotion of just and equitable principles of trade; fair |
|
representation of members; equitable allocation of dues and fees; |
|
prevention of fraud and manipulation; fostering cooperation with the |
|
clearance and settlement system; facilitation of securities |
|
transactions; discipline of members for rule violations; governing the |
|
form and content of non-exchange quotations; compliance with SEC |
|
requirements on system standards for redundancy, capacity and security; |
|
provision of audit trail capability; and maintenance of market |
|
surveillance systems. |
|
Because these extensive obligations are neither required of or by |
|
any private organization, nor is a non-SRO private organization subject |
|
to the full array of SEC oversight and review, the NASD is alone in the |
|
regulatory protections it provides among those seeking to improve bond |
|
market transparency. |
|
NASD Network and Systems Experience |
|
The NASD has developed the Nasdaq Stock Market into the world's |
|
premier electronic trading system, with the largest share volume of any |
|
market in the world. Its quotes and trade data are provided through its |
|
extensive network to over 300,000 screens worldwide. |
|
The NASD has not rested on its success, however, and is constantly |
|
improving its systems. The NASD is now deploying a new, high capacity, |
|
high reliability, state-of-the-art enterprise wide communications |
|
network to service the more than 7,000 Nasdaq workstations throughout |
|
the country. The new network will initially provide us with four |
|
billion share day network capacity, expandable to more than double that |
|
amount. It uses leading edge communications technology and transparent |
|
back-up capability to provide far greater reliability. This new |
|
network, one of the world's largest, will ensure that NASD capabilities |
|
will be more than adequate to meet any additional capacity required by |
|
a bond transparency initiative. |
|
In addition to its market building success and its systems capacity |
|
improvements, the NASD operates systems that are relevant to providing |
|
additional transparency to the bond markets. |
|
For example, the Automated Confirmation Transaction service (ACT), |
|
handles the post-execution process for Nasdaq issues' trades that were |
|
negotiated over the telephone or executed in the various execution |
|
systems of The Nasdaq Stock Market. Among the critical post-execution |
|
steps that ACT handles are: mandatory 90 second trade reporting, last |
|
sale dissemination, on-line trade comparison and reconciliation, risk |
|
management, forwarding trade data to NASDR Market Regulation for real- |
|
time oversight, and forwarding trade data to the National Securities |
|
Clearing Corporation for clearing and settlement. |
|
ACT could serve as a basis for a bond reporting and trade |
|
comparison system that could provide both heightened oversight and |
|
reduced systemic risk. Risk would be reduced by improving the |
|
comparison rate for bonds, permitting earlier settlement, simplifying |
|
processing, and reducing uncompared trades. In addition, ACT could |
|
accommodate the changes needed when the time for settlement is reduced |
|
from T+3 to T+1. |
|
nasd progress to date |
|
Since the SEC requested us to undertake this initiative in |
|
September of last year, the NASD has conducted extensive research on |
|
the depth and breadth of corporate markets, reviewed reporting and |
|
surveillance elements, and met with data vendors, clearing firms, and |
|
network display vendors. |
|
The Bond Market Transparency Committee |
|
In order to ensure that enhanced bond transparency is implemented |
|
appropriately and can be provided at the earliest possible time, the |
|
NASD has empanelled a Bond Market Transparency Committee representing |
|
investors and all major segments the bond market. These segments and |
|
Committee members include: |
|
|
|
<bullet> Individual Investors--Dr. John Markese of the American |
|
Association for Individual Investors. |
|
<bullet> Academia--Dr. Ian Domowitz, Pennsylvania State University |
|
<bullet> Institutional Investors--Ian MacKinnon of the Vanguard Group |
|
and Edward Wiese of T.Rowe Price Investment Services. |
|
<bullet> Large Discount Firms--John Ladensack of Charles Schwab & |
|
Company. |
|
<bullet> Regional Investment Banking Firms--Stanley Becchetti of A.G. |
|
Edwards and Sons, and Michael Shea of J.C. Bradford & Company. |
|
<bullet> London-Based Investment Banking Firm--Mark E. Field of |
|
Schroder & Company. |
|
<bullet> Major Investment Banking Firms--Jane Carlin of Morgan Stanley |
|
Dean Witter & Company, Kelly Martin of Merrill Lynch & Company, |
|
and Michael Mortara of Goldman, Sachs & Company |
|
<bullet> Brokers' Brokers--James Jacoby of Asiel & Company, LLC and |
|
Joseph Shea of Cantor Fitzgerald Partners. |
|
<bullet> Bond Market Association--William H. James of Lazard Freres & |
|
Company. |
|
<bullet> Securities Industry Association--Jeffrey Theodorou of |
|
Prudential Securities. |
|
<bullet> NASDR Fixed Income Committee--Zachary Snow, Chairman of the |
|
Fixed Income Committee. |
|
The Committee's Progress |
|
Our Bond Market Transparency Committee has worked diligently from |
|
its first meeting on January 14 and is moving quickly to identify and |
|
solve the issues involved with increasing transparency. The Committee |
|
has made substantial progress. |
|
The Committee has agreed in principle as to the securities that |
|
should be included in the system, which now includes: investment grade |
|
corporate debt; medium term notes issued by U.S. companies; corporate |
|
``Yankees,'' including development banks, and sovereigns; capital trust |
|
securities; convertibles; units; asset-backeds; floating rate notes, |
|
and 144A securities. |
|
The Committee will determine what will be disseminated and within |
|
what time frame in order to ensure maximum transparency without |
|
disrupting markets and consequently harming liquidity. |
|
The Committee has agreed that ACT will be important to the |
|
confirmation of reported trades, especially as the settlement cycle |
|
shortens to T+1. |
|
The Committee has established that the information that is |
|
collected should be widely disseminated to all vendors, to the maximum |
|
extent available. |
|
the bond price competition improvement act of 1999 |
|
The invitation letter to this hearing asked us to provide our |
|
comments on the Committee Draft of the Bond Price Competition |
|
Improvement Act of 1999. |
|
The NASD recognizes that the goal of the bill is to ensure that the |
|
momentum started by Chairman Levitt and Chairmen Bliley and Oxley last |
|
Fall continues toward bond market transparency. The bill would require |
|
the SEC to adopt rules on the collection and distribution of |
|
transaction information on covered debt securities. In addition, the |
|
bill would amend the definition of exempted securities in the 1934 |
|
Securities Exchange Act to cover government sponsored enterprises under |
|
the bill. Finally, the bill would require studies of inactively traded |
|
securities and municipal securities by the GAO, in consultation with |
|
the SEC and the Municipal Securities Rulemaking Board. |
|
The NASD is strongly supportive of the objectives and principles |
|
embodied in the bill of enhanced bond transparency and remains |
|
committed to work with you and your staff as this bill works its way |
|
through the legislative process. We particularly want to stress the |
|
importance of the provision in Section 2 of the bill that expressly |
|
preserves all of the Commission's authority under Section 11A. We |
|
believe that this provision is especially important in making it clear |
|
that the Commission has the authority to approve all of the terms on |
|
which market information may be obtained and distributed, including the |
|
power to assure that fees charged are fair, reasonable, and |
|
nondiscriminatory. |
|
conclusion |
|
The NASD thanks the Subcommittee for this opportunity to update it |
|
on our progress toward increased bond transparency and our views on the |
|
recently introduced bill. |
|
We strongly support the goals and objectives of the Committee Draft |
|
of the Bond Price Competition Improvement Act, a bill to enhance bond |
|
market transparency. We believe that our experience in developing |
|
systems for both the equity markets and the high yield bond markets |
|
will serve as a strong foundation as we prepare to fulfill our |
|
commitment to the SEC to improve transparency in the bond markets. |
|
Although we would all like to implement important changes like |
|
transparency quickly, we are proud of our efforts to date and pledge |
|
our continued efforts. We will work with the Congress, the SEC and the |
|
securities industry to make the necessary changes a reality at the |
|
earliest possible time, with the maximum benefit to the investor and |
|
minimum disruption to the industry. |
|
|
|
Mr. Oxley. Thank you, Mr. Campbell. Mr. Green. |
|
|
|
STATEMENT OF MICAH S. GREEN |
|
|
|
Mr. Green. Thank you, very much, Mr. Chairman. It's a |
|
pleasure to be before the subcommittee today. If I could ask |
|
that my entire written testimony be submitted for the record |
|
and I will talk more topically about the legislation and the |
|
Bond Market Association's initiative. |
|
Mr. Oxley. Without objection, both statements will be made |
|
part of the record. |
|
Mr. Green. Thank you. Before going into the legislation and |
|
our initiative, I want to first commend you and the members of |
|
the subcommittee and the leadership of the committee and the |
|
staff of the committee for everything they have done since the |
|
hearing last September, in urging the industry and the NASD and |
|
the SEC to get involved in this effort. Since September, we've |
|
taken your guidance and your urging very seriously and we |
|
commend you for your leadership in bringing this issue to the |
|
level of public attention that it surely needed. And I'd also |
|
like to commend the SEC Chairman Levitt, the entire SEC staff |
|
and members, as well as the NASD and our friend Pat Campbell |
|
for everything they have done in reaching out to the industry, |
|
so that we can work cooperatively in this effort. There's not a |
|
competition between a private sector initiative and what the |
|
NASD is working on. Frankly, they are very complementary |
|
efforts. But, we are working very, very closely with the NASD |
|
and look forward to that good working relationship going |
|
forward on this and other issues. So, I commend them for their |
|
leadership. |
|
We represent--the Bond Market Association represents |
|
underwriters and dealers of municipal bonds, corporate bonds, |
|
government securities, and virtually all bonds that are traded |
|
and sold by issuing authorities throughout the country and |
|
throughout the world. And we're very proud of the fact and |
|
several times over the last many, many years, when this |
|
committee has brought to the at- |
|
|
|
tention of the industry and the regulators problems that exist |
|
in the marketplace, that we have tried to step up to the plate |
|
and address those issues. And in so doing, we have tried to be |
|
not only responsive to the industry--to the concerns of Members |
|
of Congress and the regulators, but have also tried very |
|
seriously to look very deeply into ourselves and to make sure |
|
we're not missing something. And throughout the consideration |
|
of the Government's Securities Act, as well as the municipal |
|
securities market and now the corporate market, we've tried to |
|
step up and to say what's right and what's wrong about these |
|
markets and work vigorously and objectively to try to address |
|
those issues. |
|
Our written statement, unfortunately, was submitted prior |
|
to the issuance of the final draft of legislation. And I want |
|
to state here today that the latest draft that we saw is a |
|
draft that the Bond Market Association can be supportive of. We |
|
feel very strongly that the legislation reflects the interest |
|
of the free marketplace, by acknowledging that private sector |
|
initiatives should be considered by regulators prior to |
|
finalizing a direction for the regulator to take. And we don't |
|
view this as a delay at all, because as you'll hear in a |
|
moment, our private sector initiative is weeks away from |
|
becoming an absolute reality. But, we do believe that when an |
|
industry acknowledges the criticism that is raised by |
|
policymakers and is willing to take the actions necessary to |
|
address the concerns raised by those policymakers, there should |
|
be absolute consideration of the results of that work, because, |
|
otherwise, would make all this work meaningless and this work |
|
is very important. In a sense, we've become a laboratory for |
|
price transparency in the corporate bond market. |
|
So, we commend the subcommittee for including that |
|
bracketed language that was talked about earlier. Frankly, I |
|
view the brackets more as a highlight, that it's the most |
|
important of the bill. And I know that there will be debate on |
|
it. But, we do view that if this legislation is not intended to |
|
impart new regulatory authority to the SEC, but, in fact, to |
|
impart a congressional desire to employ regulatory authority |
|
that already exists, what you're doing with this bill is laying |
|
out your views, as to how that existing authority should be |
|
utilized. And by simply adding that they shall consider--and |
|
shall consider the private sector initiatives in carrying out |
|
the provisions of this Act, is not an impediment. In fact, it |
|
will make the whole process work that much better and the |
|
Commission and the regulators and the NASD will have the value |
|
of our initiative in moving forward. |
|
Second, the legislation is tremendously improved by |
|
including language in there that requires the consideration of |
|
the effect on liquidity in the marketplace. We don't sit here |
|
today to say that price transparency will hurt liquidity in the |
|
marketplace. Rather, we say that liquidity in the marketplace |
|
is extremely important; that if you lose liquidity, you hurt |
|
the ability of states and corporations and governments to come |
|
to market and get the very best prices on their bonds and get |
|
the very lowest cost of borrowing. So, it should be a |
|
consideration when looking at price transparency in the |
|
corporate bond market. And if it proves that it's not a |
|
problem, carry on. If it proves that it is a problem, it should |
|
influence how the final outcome appears. |
|
And then finally, we are also very appreciative of the fact |
|
that your legislation does not spell out a specific form of |
|
transparency and you leave that up to what the SROs are doing |
|
and what the marketplace is doing, to try to figure out what |
|
the best way to approach that issue is. So, we commend you for |
|
the current version of legislation and we do look forward to |
|
working with you on that. |
|
Now, if I may very briefly talk about where our initiative |
|
is and what the derivation of our initiative. The derivation of |
|
our initiative is this subcommittee. This subcommittee, and I |
|
can hear the words coming out of many of the subcommittee |
|
member's mouths, as if it were yesterday, and it was only a few |
|
months ago, that the industry had to do something. And we came |
|
out of our hearing immediately and met with Arthur Levitt, and |
|
after forming a transparency committee, informed him that we |
|
were prepared to do something very tangible in this area. And |
|
we presented a proposal to him and we sent it, of course, to |
|
the committee, as well. And immediately thereafter, we issued a |
|
request for proposal, an RFP, from various information |
|
providers and information services, to try to implement our |
|
price transparency system. We asked that those proposals be |
|
delivered by December 31. We really thrilled a lot of people |
|
for the Christmas holidays. But by December 31, we received |
|
nine proposals from a wide array of information providers. |
|
During the first 2 weeks of January, we reviewed those |
|
proposals. And at the end of January, we awarded a contract to |
|
GovPX. Why GovPX? Because GovPX is a facilitator of |
|
information. Just as it has provided tremendous market-based |
|
information in the government securities market, as well as, as |
|
Bob Colby said, the agency market, GovPX can be a facilitator |
|
here. And to address Congresswoman's Degette's point, they, |
|
also, have fabulous quality control measures at work right now |
|
in the government securities market, and we wanted them to be |
|
employed here, too. And now, we're about to test. Next week we |
|
have beta testing planned for this, in the hopes that this |
|
system, as designed to try to capture transaction information |
|
on a continuous basis through the day on actively traded |
|
securities, becomes alive at the end of April. |
|
Now, we're not saying it's the end all and be all. What |
|
we're saying is we are doing what we can, as an industry, to |
|
facilitate addressing your concerns as a committee as quickly |
|
as possible. We are working very closely with the NASD in this |
|
whole process, to try to move forward and beyond. But, at this |
|
stage, we are a few weeks away of having something up and |
|
running that would give everyone, the public, market |
|
participants, better information. And it would give regulators |
|
the information they need to survey the market, albeit as was |
|
said, not for all securities in the market, but for those that |
|
we can capture quickly that would give better surveillance and |
|
enforcement information and, more importantly, it would give |
|
regulators and this committee information as to what price |
|
transparency should look like going forward. |
|
So, we believe very strongly that it would be short sighted |
|
to move forward on a specific regulatory approach right now, |
|
until you've seen the results of this, which is, as you can, by |
|
the chart over there are just weeks away. And as soon as it |
|
goes on live, we will start seeing information. And also to |
|
answer several questions that came out about cost, we intend |
|
that this information, on cor- |
|
|
|
porate bond transaction information for those actively traded |
|
securities would be available through our onsite |
|
www.investingandbonds.com, free of charge to investors, just |
|
like we do it now for the municipal market. And as Chairman |
|
Levitt's written statement said, that municipal market Website |
|
is hit many, many times throughout the day. |
|
So, we're very proud of this effort, but we, also, realize |
|
that regulators and legislators want more. And we're willing to |
|
work toward the next steps beyond this, but we, also, feel very |
|
strongly that this laboratory that we've set up will have |
|
results from that experiment and they should be allowed to be |
|
analyzed and looked at, as we move forward. |
|
So, with that, I welcome your questions. And Mr. Chairman, |
|
I thank you and the committee. |
|
[The prepared statement of Micah S. Green follows:] |
|
Prepared Statement of Micah S. Green, Executive Vice President, The |
|
Bond Market Association |
|
The Bond Market Association appreciates the opportunity to comment |
|
on price transparency in the bond markets, and to present our views on |
|
associated legislative and regulatory issues. The Bond Market |
|
Association represents securities firms and banks that underwrite, |
|
trade, and sell debt securities both domestically and internationally. |
|
We commend Chairman Bliley, Chairman Oxley, and the subcommittee for |
|
taking the time to examine this important issue. |
|
Last September, this Subcommittee held a hearing that examined the |
|
state of price transparency in the bond markets. At that hearing, |
|
Chairman Bliley and others challenged the industry to improve price |
|
transparency in the bond markets. Securities and Exchange Commission |
|
Chairman Arthur Levitt made a similar call in a New York speech on |
|
September 9th, and again at the hearing. The industry has heeded those |
|
calls. |
|
In September, we pledged our support for the goal of providing |
|
investors with meaningful price information and reaffirmed our |
|
commitment to improve price transparency in the corporate bond markets. |
|
In keeping with that pledge, the Association is sponsoring a private- |
|
sector initiative that will provide price data on inter-dealer broker |
|
trades of investment grade corporate bonds to all market participants |
|
and investors. Beginning next month, the Association expects to |
|
inaugurate a service that makes transaction price data available |
|
directly to regulators and to the public through a wide range of data |
|
vendors and free of charge on our investor website. Under a contractual |
|
arrangement, the transparency product--Corporate Trades I--is being co- |
|
developed by the Association and GovPX Inc. GovPX is a leading provider |
|
of price and volume data in the government securities market and will |
|
operate the system for data collection and dissemination. |
|
This initiative represents our initial attempt to improve the |
|
availability of price data to the public for the corporate bond |
|
markets. In addition, the initiative creates a laboratory in which both |
|
market participants and regulators can obtain important insights into |
|
the interaction between transaction reporting and liquidity. We are |
|
pleased to report at this time that the timeframe for the inauguration |
|
of public reports by the end of April remains realistic and achievable. |
|
At the same time, we acknowledge that this initiative is merely one |
|
part of a longer process through which a variety of different systems |
|
and solutions will evolve. |
|
Historically, industry-based solutions to transparency challenges |
|
in the bond markets have addressed the needs of legislators, |
|
regulators, and market participants alike, and have resulted in |
|
significant improvements in the amount and quality of price data |
|
available to the public without disruption of market liquidity. The |
|
Bond Market Association played a major, proactive role in the design |
|
and implementation of systems to enhance price transparency in the |
|
government and municipal bond markets. We will do the same in the |
|
corporate markets. |
|
In the government securities market, the Association was |
|
instrumental in the creation of the GoxPX system for Treasury |
|
securities. Today, GoxPX is recognized as a leading provider of real- |
|
time price and volume information, and is widely credited with |
|
significantly improving price transparency in the government securities |
|
markets. In the municipal market, we worked closely with the Municipal |
|
Securities Rulemaking Board (MSRB) to develop a transaction reporting |
|
system that provides relevant data to investors. Last November, the |
|
Association, in coordination with Standard & Poor's J.J. Kenny, began |
|
posting the MSRB's price and volume data--enhanced by yield, credit |
|
rating, call dates, and other useful information--on its investor |
|
website, investinginbonds.com. This user-friendly service enables |
|
investors to obtain enhanced end-of-day pricing information--from the |
|
previous trading day--on actual municipal bond transactions free of |
|
charge. |
|
Clearly, this industry has established a tradition of responding |
|
promptly and efficiently to calls for increased price transparency in |
|
the bond markets. The corporate markets are no exception. In less than |
|
six months, the industry has made substantial progress toward |
|
implementing a system that will enhance corporate bond price |
|
transparency. [See the attached timeline that illustrates the progress |
|
of our transparency initiative.] Our commitment to improving |
|
transparency is serious, and we are making it happen. Therefore, we |
|
believe it would be premature at this time, to enact legislation |
|
designed to immediately mandate transparency through regulatory decree. |
|
In this statement, we focus on three themes. First, we will present |
|
our views on the critical relationship between price transparency and |
|
market liquidity in the corporate bond markets. Second, we will discuss |
|
the progress the industry has made toward improving price transparency |
|
since September. Finally, we will discuss why legislation to improve |
|
transparency through regulatory decree is not necessary at this time. |
|
Transparency Policy Issues |
|
The Association fully supports the goal of enhancing price |
|
transparency in the corporate bond markets. However, price transparency |
|
should not be confused with regulatory reporting. Regulatory reporting |
|
involves providing trade information to regulators for audit trail or |
|
other market surveillance purposes. The Association fully supports the |
|
timely transmission of corporate bond transaction information to |
|
regulators and/or Self-regulatory Organizations if such reporting is |
|
necessary to properly surveil the market to prevent and detect market |
|
abuses. However, the appropriate definition of ``timely'' depends on |
|
the regulatory objectives. |
|
The Association encourages regulators to consider the costs and |
|
benefits of implementing a system that would require immediate |
|
reporting of every trade in the corporate bond markets. The differences |
|
between the equity market and the bond markets have long been |
|
recognized by regulators. Chairman Levitt himself is on record stating |
|
he is ``not suggesting that we transpose the national market system |
|
built for equities to the debt markets.'' The Association urges |
|
Congress and regulators to keep this in mind as they move forward with |
|
plans for enhancing regulatory reporting systems to supplement dealer |
|
books and records which have long been available for inspection. |
|
In contrast to regulatory reporting, price transparency is the |
|
timely dissemination of trade information to the public. Here, the |
|
objective is to provide the public--including both large institutional |
|
investors that dominate the corporate bond markets and individuals-- |
|
with useful information about the current price levels of bonds they |
|
hold or wish to buy or sell--without jeopardizing their ability to |
|
trade these bonds. Here, we raise the issue of real-time price |
|
dissemination because some have indicated their belief that the public |
|
has a right to know the prices and volumes of all trades |
|
instantaneously. |
|
The nature of the corporate bond markets creates some unique |
|
challenges for the design of systems that would efficiently distribute |
|
meaningful price data to all investors. First, there are many different |
|
bond issues outstanding, and over 95 percent of corporate bonds are |
|
held by institutional investors. In the corporate bond markets alone |
|
there are an estimated 400,000 individual bonds |
|
outstanding.<SUP>1</SUP> Second, the vast majority of outstanding bonds |
|
trade very infrequently, i.e., the bond markets are not continuous |
|
trading markets. Unlike the stock market where most issues trade daily, |
|
it is not unusual for months to pass between trades in a particular |
|
bond issue. For example, in 1996, of the approximately 400,000 |
|
corporate bonds outstanding, only 4 percent traded at some point during |
|
the year.<SUP>2</SUP> |
|
--------------------------------------------------------------------------- |
|
\1\ Source: CUSIP Service Bureau. Estimate includes corporate |
|
bonds, medium-term notes, asset-backed bonds, and non-agency mortgage |
|
securities outstanding as of September 1998. |
|
\2\ Bond Market Association estimate. |
|
--------------------------------------------------------------------------- |
|
The Association is also quite concerned about the negative effect |
|
that real-time dissemination could have on liquidity in the corporate |
|
bond markets. Since dealers and institutions trade large blocks of |
|
bonds, revealing prices and trading volumes instantaneously could hurt |
|
market liquidity. If market participants (i.e., potential |
|
counterparties) had access to information about other market |
|
participant's trading strategies, it would be more difficult to conduct |
|
further trades. Given the non-con- |
|
|
|
tinuous trading environment of the bond markets, a market participant |
|
attempting to ``unwind'' a large position would definitely not want the |
|
prices of sales posted before the position was fully liquidated. Often, |
|
a small number of institutions or dealers hold very large blocks of a |
|
particular issue, and thus, a liquidation of their position would be |
|
obvious to the market. Additionally, once the bonds are taken into |
|
inventory by a dealer, it could take days, or even weeks to find a |
|
buyer for these less-liquid bonds. |
|
The bond markets depend on the willingness of dealers to take |
|
positions in bonds and carry inventory, thereby shifting market risk to |
|
the financial intermediary and creating liquidity for investors. The |
|
premature release of transaction information could inhibit the trading |
|
activity of these vital market participants. Clearly, a prolonged |
|
reduction in market liquidity would have serious consequences not only |
|
for the bond markets, but for the economy as a whole. Liquidity |
|
disturbances, such as those that occurred in the bond markets last |
|
fall, can lead to a higher cost of capital for bond issuers, and |
|
inhibit capital formation. Higher capital costs for America's |
|
corporations translate into less funding for capital expansion--a |
|
significant factor affecting economic growth. This is why the |
|
Association's initiative is designed to strike an important balance |
|
between transparency and market liquidity. |
|
Regulators have long recognized the differences between highly |
|
liquid markets--such as those for most listed equities, and less liquid |
|
markets--when crafting rules for various markets with respect to the |
|
timeliness and content of public dissemination. In most of the equities |
|
markets, price transparency has been equated with real time last sale |
|
reporting. While real-time transaction price and size dissemination |
|
characterizes the nature of price transparency for liquid equity |
|
securities, transparency for illiquid equities is quite different. |
|
Trade data for liquid equities must be reported to the NASD within 90 |
|
seconds of the transaction via the Automated Confirmation System (ACT), |
|
which automatically disseminates trade information to the public. |
|
However, trades in illiquid equity securities are reported to the NASD |
|
for regulatory purposes--but not via ACT--and these trades are not ever |
|
reported to the public. Additionally, odd-lot transactions in National |
|
Market securities and private placements (in reliance on Section 4(2) |
|
of the Securities Act) are not required to be reported through the ACT |
|
system. |
|
Likewise, transparency initiatives for the OTC bond markets need to |
|
take into account the individualistic nature of bonds, differences in |
|
liquidity, and differences across instruments in the various bond |
|
markets. Historically, these differences have been recognized by |
|
Congress and regulatory authorities as evidenced by the differences |
|
between existing bond market transparency systems that have been |
|
developed and have been found to be providing adequate information to |
|
date. The attached table illustrates the characteristics of several |
|
transaction reporting systems currently operating in U.S. financial |
|
markets. |
|
In the government securities market, GovPX is a leading provider of |
|
real-time benchmark pricing for all active and off-the-run Treasuries. |
|
The liquid nature of Treasury securities led to a solution that |
|
provides prompt price dissemination for Treasury securities. In the |
|
municipal market, price transparency has been greatly enhanced by the |
|
Municipal Securities Rulemaking Board's (MSRB) end-of-day trade |
|
reporting, a system that currently includes both dealer and customer |
|
trades. Beginning in November 1998, the Association began posting this |
|
data on its investinginbonds.com website free of charge. Investors can |
|
access CUSIP numbers, security descriptions, number of trades, volume, |
|
and high and low prices for municipal bonds that trade four or more |
|
times on the prior day. Additionally, investors can sort the data |
|
according to State or other criteria. This enhanced user-friendly |
|
format has been well-received by the investing public. The less-liquid |
|
nature of the municipal securities market led to the development of |
|
this time-delayed and synthesized trade reporting system. It is |
|
important to note that individual investor response to this data has |
|
been extremely favorable and liquidity in this market was apparently |
|
unharmed by the implementation of this system. |
|
In the corporate market, a price transparency system for high-yield |
|
bonds has been in place since 1994. The NASD introduced the Fixed |
|
Income Pricing System (FIPS) to enhance transparency in the high-yield |
|
sector. FIPS provides for the collection, processing, and real-time |
|
display of firm quotations and summary transaction data for 50 |
|
designated (mandatory) high-yield bonds. Interestingly, actual |
|
transactions are never disseminated to FIPS participants or to the |
|
public. Again, it should be noted that regulators fully recognized the |
|
possible harm that could be brought about by real-time transaction |
|
dissemination and by imposing a system on the entire market. In a 1991 |
|
report to Congress, then SEC Chairman Richard Breeden acknowledged that |
|
mandating increased price transparency to the entire high-yield market |
|
could be harmful: |
|
. . . mandating increased transparency for the large segment of |
|
the market that is illiquid could further reduce dealer |
|
participation in that segment of the market, and is therefore |
|
only practical where a ``critical mass'' of market participants |
|
exists. |
|
The foregoing review of transparency systems in the market for |
|
illiquid equities and in the bond markets highlights a critical fact. |
|
Currently, there are no real-time transaction reporting systems in |
|
existence that require or provide immediate public dissemination of |
|
every trade in a given class of illiquid securities. Furthermore, |
|
regulators have recognized the difference between liquid and illiquid |
|
securities when developing regulations for equities and for high-yield |
|
bonds. Therefore, the Association would object to any system that |
|
mandates dissemination of the price and size of every bond trade to the |
|
public on a real-time basis. Given that there is no precedent for |
|
requiring such an extensive system, the negative impact on the markets |
|
would be difficult to quantify since it has not been observed in any |
|
market for relatively illiquid securities. However, academic research |
|
has shown that too much transparency can actually increase market |
|
volatility and lower market liquidity in markets where trading volume |
|
is thin--precisely the type of characterization that applies to a large |
|
number of securities in the corporate bond markets.<SUP>3</SUP> |
|
Therefore, the Association is concerned that market liquidity could be |
|
negatively affected by the mandatory real-time disclosure of all |
|
trades. |
|
--------------------------------------------------------------------------- |
|
\3\ See Ananth Madhavan, ``Security Prices and Market |
|
Transparency,'' Journal of Financial Intermediation, no. 5, 1996, pp. |
|
255-283. |
|
--------------------------------------------------------------------------- |
|
The Association believes the best way to expeditiously achieve |
|
meaningful price transparency in the corporate bond markets is to |
|
embrace a market-oriented approach that is designed to preserve market |
|
liquidity. This approach will also allow for the reassessment of |
|
existing systems and adjustments to the systems over time. This is |
|
consistent with the historical approach to price transparency that has |
|
proven to be successful in the government and municipal bond markets. |
|
The Association's Transparency Initiative |
|
The Association has taken the lead in developing a system that will |
|
enhance price transparency in the investment grade corporate bond |
|
market. In September, the Association organized a Price Transparency |
|
Steering Committee, under the auspices of our Corporate Bond Division, |
|
to examine the issues that must be considered when designing |
|
appropriate systems to improve price transparency without damaging |
|
market liquidity. The Committee is comprised of senior bond officials |
|
from dealer and inter-dealer broker firms. After the Subcommittee |
|
hearing last September, the Committee resolved to implement a system |
|
that would respond directly to the challenge put forth by Congress and |
|
the SEC. |
|
Members of the Steering Committee met with SEC Chairman Levitt in |
|
October to express the industry's desire to design and implement a |
|
first-phase transparency solution within a six-month period. |
|
Recognizing that the industry initiative would likely have to meld with |
|
the longer-term goals envisioned by the SEC, the Steering Committee |
|
proceeded with the plan to design an initial price transparency system |
|
for investment grade corporate bonds. |
|
In November, the Association issued a ``request for proposals'' |
|
(RFP) that asked pricing and information vendors, as well as others who |
|
could facilitate this initiative, to submit proposals presenting how |
|
they would implement the Association's initiative by enabling inter- |
|
dealer brokers to submit investment grade corporate bond transaction |
|
data and redistribute such data to the public through electronic means. |
|
The Association also held a bidders conference to answer questions and |
|
discuss other aspects of the plan with prospective bidders. |
|
By the end of December, the Association had received nine proposals |
|
from an impressive group of bidders. Following interviews and |
|
deliberation in January, the Steering Committee selected GovPX as the |
|
vendor that would design and operate the system for the industry's |
|
transparency initiative. GovPX proposed a collection mechanism that is |
|
extremely flexible and can be adapted over time to include a wider |
|
range of reporting entities and/or securities. The ability of the |
|
initial system to expand and adapt to future modifications is a strong- |
|
point of the GovPX system. In addition, from the perspective of the |
|
Association, GovPX is essentially a ``facilitator'' with a strong track |
|
record and financial incentives to redistribute price data through the |
|
broadest range of existing and prospective data vendors. Finally, GovPX |
|
has extensive experience collecting price data from inter-dealer |
|
brokers and disseminating that data for the entire range of government |
|
securities. |
|
Last month, the Steering Committee adopted a set of initial display |
|
parameters for the transparency system, and intends to consider |
|
adjustments to these preliminary parameters after the system has become |
|
operational. The initial parameters were developed in consultation with |
|
a broad range of the Association's membership not only from Wall |
|
Street, but from across the country. Of paramount importance to the |
|
Committee was the intention to protect the confidentiality of |
|
investors' positions, particularly with regard to less-liquid debt |
|
securities. Over the past several months, the Committee collected |
|
valuable input from inter-dealer brokers, dealers, and their customers |
|
before determining the initial parameters for the transparency |
|
initiative. |
|
The Association's Voluntary Price Transparency Initiative product, |
|
called Corporate Trades I, will collect price data on investment grade |
|
corporate bonds from inter-dealer brokers to meet this Subcommittee's |
|
priority to disseminate data to the public, and to meet the SEC's and |
|
the NASD's priority to obtain information for surveillance purposes. |
|
The Association expects that inter-dealer brokers active in the |
|
investment grade corporate bond market will report data on all |
|
transactions to GovPX. To date, seven leading inter-dealer brokers-- |
|
which account for approximately 90 percent of investment grade trades |
|
of all inter-dealer brokers--have informed the Association of their |
|
intent to participate in this voluntary initiative. GovPX will then |
|
make the data available to the public consistent with the preliminary |
|
display parameters agreed to by the Steering Committee and the |
|
Corporate Bond Division of the Association. |
|
With respect to dissemination of transaction data to the public, |
|
the initial display parameters will provide for continuous reporting |
|
throughout the day of the prices of all investment grade corporate |
|
bonds that have been traded at least four times and involve individual |
|
transactions of $10 million or less. This information will be |
|
disseminated to GovPX subscribers within one hour of the occurrence of |
|
the fourth trade and within one hour for all trades in the same |
|
security thereafter. At the end of each trading day, the price and size |
|
range of every trade meeting these parameters will be disseminated to |
|
the public and enhanced with descriptive information including credit |
|
ratings and yield-to-Treasury data. |
|
Actual sizes of individual trades will not be revealed publicly in |
|
order to preserve investor anonymity, which is important due to the |
|
concentrated ownership of corporate bonds. The Association's |
|
preliminary view is that these public display parameters strike a fair |
|
balance between our objective of enhancing transparency without |
|
jeopardizing market liquidity. However, for surveillance purposes, |
|
regulators will be provided with a file of all price and volume data |
|
for all trades reported to GovPX. |
|
We expect this new information product to be available to the |
|
public through data vendors before the end of April. In addition, the |
|
Association plans to make the data available in a user-friendly format |
|
on its investinginbonds.com website free of charge at the same time or |
|
shortly thereafter. |
|
Legislation Mandating Regulatory Action is Not Needed |
|
The Association believes that legislation mandating immediate |
|
regulatory action for price transparency is unnecessary and unwarranted |
|
at this time. This industry has responded promptly to calls for |
|
increased transparency. Widespread market abuses have not been |
|
identified in the corporate bond markets, nor have investors clamored |
|
for more protection due to opaque conditions in the corporate markets. |
|
While it is appropriate and commendable for Congress to examine the |
|
issues related to price transparency in the bond markets, the |
|
industry--given our response and action since last September's |
|
hearing--should be given the opportunity to complete development of |
|
appropriate, market-specific solutions. |
|
It is our strong belief that, as in the other bond markets, this |
|
market-based solution should be assessed before a regulatory response |
|
is determined or mandated. In this regard, the Association would be |
|
willing to provide Congress with a report that details our progress on |
|
implementing the system after it has become operational for a |
|
reasonable amount of time. It is our sincere hope that the SEC and |
|
NASD, who have already begun a regulatory review of this matter, will |
|
take into account the results of this important initiative before |
|
decisions are made about a regulatory response. However, if legislation |
|
is deemed to be necessary, legislation embodying a logical and orderly |
|
market-oriented process would be preferable to legislation that |
|
prematurely mandates regulatory action, as the latter would signal |
|
regulators to proceed regardless of the results of the industry's |
|
initiative. |
|
Some have proposed expanding the National Market System for |
|
equities to include the bond markets. In addition, some have advocated |
|
expanding the definition of non-exempt securities under Section 11A of |
|
the Securities Exchange Act to include federally-sponsored agency |
|
securities and securities issued by international financial |
|
organizations, such as the World Bank. The Association opposes such |
|
proposals for several reasons. |
|
First, the legislative history surrounding the 1975 Amendments that |
|
enacted Section 11A reflects the fact that Congress' intended focus in |
|
creating a National Mar- |
|
|
|
ket System (NMS) was on the regulation of the equity markets. The NMS |
|
framework and goals were born out of the unique circumstances that |
|
characterized the market structure for corporate equity securities in |
|
the early 1970s. Bond markets were then, and continue be, significantly |
|
different structurally from the equities market. |
|
The SEC and Chairman Levitt have been vocal in their belief that |
|
the National Market System should not be transposed on the debt |
|
markets. In his speech last September, Chairman Levitt said: |
|
I am not suggesting that we transpose the National Market |
|
System built for equities to the debt markets. For many |
|
reasons, that would not work. |
|
Finally, the proposed expansion of the definition of non-exempt |
|
securities to include agencies and issues of international financial |
|
organizations, is not warranted based on the findings of recent |
|
regulatory reports. Last March, the Treasury Department, the SEC, and |
|
the Federal Reserve Board released their ``Joint Study of the |
|
Regulatory System for Government Securities,'' which considered the |
|
state of transparency in the Treasury and agency securities markets. |
|
The report recognized the ``variety of pricing and related |
|
information'' that is available from financial publications and online |
|
vendors. The report concluded that the government securities market-- |
|
which by definition includes federally sponsored agencies--is |
|
functioning smoothly: |
|
The market continues to function smoothly, and the three |
|
agencies do not believe it is flawed in any fundamental sense. |
|
As a result, we believe no additional rulemaking authority |
|
under the [Government Securities Act], as amended, is required |
|
at this time. |
|
Additionally, the SEC's Debt Market Review came to a similar |
|
conclusion regarding Treasury and federal agency securities: |
|
The combination of real time data for benchmark Treasuries |
|
and supplementary quotes and other information for the other |
|
securities appears to provide a very good level of pricing |
|
information for all government bonds. |
|
The Review also examined non-agency mortgage and other structured |
|
products and concluded that the ``quality of pricing information and |
|
interpretive tools available to the market is good.'' The SEC has |
|
repeatedly decided not to pursue regulatory changes to the markets for |
|
agency and non-agency mortgage-and asset-backed securities. The Bond |
|
Market Association supports the conclusions of the SEC regarding this |
|
matter. |
|
Conclusions |
|
For over a decade, The Bond Market Association has been at the |
|
forefront of efforts to improve price transparency in the bond markets. |
|
Our most recent initiative will deliver price data on investment grade |
|
corporate bonds to the general public on our investor website--free of |
|
charge--in the coming weeks. While we agree that enhancing price |
|
transparency for liquid securities is a laudable goal, we maintain that |
|
widespread dissemination of trade data for illiquid securities will |
|
likely have a negative impact on market liquidity and on bond market |
|
investors. We will continue to work with the Members of this |
|
Subcommittee, the SEC, the NASD, and others, to ensure that investors |
|
have access to meaningful price information on bonds. However, we do |
|
not believe that legislation mandating immediate regulatory action is |
|
warranted at this time. We believe that policy-makers should consider |
|
the industry's efforts before determining what regulatory actions may |
|
be necessary. |
|
|
|
Voluntary Price Transparency Initiative Timeline of Progress |
|
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |
|
September 1998 October 1998 November 1998 December 1998 January 1999 February 1999 March 1999 April 1999 |
|
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |
|
At transparency hearing, Association Association Association Association Association's Association and Association and |
|
Association pledges to work members meet issues a receives reviews nine Transparency GovPX plan to GovPX plan to |
|
to enhance price with SEC request for proposals from vendor Steering begin testing launch |
|
transparency. Chairman Levitt proposals to bidding vendors. proposals and Committee system to Corporate |
|
and begin to develop selects GovPX adopts transmit and Trades I. |
|
develop transparency as vendor for parameters for disseminate Association |
|
industry product and the industry the prices. plans to post |
|
initiative. hosts bidders. initiative. transparency data on its |
|
Association system--Corpor investingbonds |
|
hosts open ate Trades I. .com website |
|
forum on price |
|
transparency. |
|
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |
|
|
|
|
|
Characteristics of Selected Transaction Reporting Systems: Ranked from High to Low Liquidity |
|
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |
|
Security's General Dissemination Dissemination Release Actual |
|
Security System Liquidity Type Reporting Timeframe Audience Trades to Public |
|
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |
|
Exchange-listed Equities....... ACT (Nasdaq) DOT Very high......... Within 90 seconds Instantly-price Market participants Yes |
|
and OARS (NYSE). of trade (ACT) and volume. and consolidated |
|
and automatically tape. |
|
in DOT and OARS. |
|
Treasury Securities............ GovPX............. High.............. Instant-built into Instant-price and GovPX participants Yes |
|
system. volume. and subscribing |
|
vendors. |
|
Agency Bonds................... GovPX............. High.............. Instant-built into Instantly-price GovPX participants Yes |
|
system. and volume. and subscribing |
|
vendors. |
|
High Yield Bonds-Mandatory NFIPS (Nasdaq).... Relatively high... Within 5 minutes Every Hour-Price FIPS participants No |
|
Issues \1\. of trade. and Volume and data vendors. |
|
Summary. |
|
Municipal Bonds................ MSRB (NSCC)....... Varies but End of day........ Next Day price and Data vendors and The No |
|
typically low. summary volume Bond Market |
|
data for bonds Association's |
|
that traded 4 or website- |
|
more times. investinginbonds.co |
|
m. |
|
Investment Grade Corporate Corporate Trades I Varies but Within 15 minutes Within 1 hour GovPX subscribers No |
|
Bonds. (The Bond Market typically low. of trade. after 4th trade and investors |
|
Association/ and within 1 hour through |
|
GovPX). for subsequent Association's |
|
trades--prices website- |
|
released for investinginbonds.co |
|
trades of $10 m. |
|
mil. or less. |
|
New York Stock Exchange-Listed ABS (NYSE)........ Varies but Instant-built into Instantly-price market participants Yes \2\ |
|
Bonds. typically low. system. and volume. and high speed |
|
quote line; summary |
|
data in newspapers. |
|
High Yield Bonds-Nonmandatory FIPS (Nasdaq)..... Low............... By 5 p.m. on day None.............. None................ No |
|
\3\. of trade. |
|
Non-Nasdaq Equities \4\........ Non-Nasdaq Low............... Price and volume None.............. No.................. No |
|
Reporting System data reported |
|
(NASD). between 4 p.m. |
|
and 6:30 p.m. on |
|
trade date or |
|
between 7:30 a.m. |
|
and 9 a.m. on |
|
next business day. |
|
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |
|
\1\ Mandatory FIPS bonds are the 50 most active high-yield bonds as designated by an advisory committee; this committee meets every six months to |
|
reassess the mandatory list. |
|
\2\ The vast majority of NYSE bond trades are retail, odd-lot transactions. |
|
\3\ Non-mandatory FIPS issues are all bonds rated BB+ or lower by Standard & Poor's, excluding those designated as mandatory FIPS issues. |
|
\4\ Non-Nasdaq equities are defined as securities that are neither included in The Nasdaq Stock Market nor traded on any national securities exchange. |
|
|
|
|
|
Mr. Oxley. I thank both the gentlemen, and we appreciate |
|
your good work in this area. Let me begin by asking Mr. Green: |
|
what should we be looking for in April, when this program is |
|
going to become available? What are you going to be looking for |
|
and what do we need to look for, in terms of the applicability |
|
of this program and its effectiveness? |
|
Mr. Green. Well, in April, and assuming all the beta |
|
testing and everything goes well, but so far, so good, |
|
transaction information on the investment grade corporate bonds |
|
that are traded through interdealer brokers will begin getting |
|
reported on a continued--on a continuous basis throughout the |
|
trading day to GovPX. GovPX will then pipeline that information |
|
out to information vendors, to the Bond Market Association for |
|
use on our Website, and also to regulators. And regulators will |
|
frankly get complete information, so that they can do their |
|
surveillance enforcement activity on those sets of bonds |
|
throughout the trading day. Also at the end of the day, there |
|
will be more complete reports about the total volumes and |
|
buckets of volumes to see what transacted through the trading |
|
day. But, immediately when it's turned on, that reporting |
|
process will begin. |
|
Now, with regard to our Website, we hope it's--we hope the |
|
Website, itself, is ready to take that feed at the end of April |
|
and that's--it may be a few weeks after that, once we see the |
|
information flowing. |
|
Mr. Oxley. Let me ask Mr. Campbell, what role then does |
|
NASDAQ play in this whole process? Take us through the |
|
mechanics of this, if you will. Also, what will you be looking |
|
for in terms of the effectiveness of the GovPX program? |
|
Mr. Campbell. Mr. Chairman, we have, since last September, |
|
had many meetings with our committee on bond transparency. We |
|
have done a fine job in defining and getting in the process of |
|
writing rules. We expect to be delivering those rules to the |
|
Securities and Exchange Commission very early summer, hopefully |
|
in the month of June. |
|
During the period of time that the Bond Market |
|
Association's experiment with collecting and disseminating the |
|
bond transaction information, we should be very sensitive to |
|
what we can learn from them through this initiative and |
|
incorporate that into the rules that we write to follow the |
|
Securities and Exchange Commission, that all broker-dealers |
|
will ultimately have to abide by. And I think the fact that we |
|
have included on our committee a representative of the Bond |
|
Market Association to assist us in the process, we believe that |
|
we should gain some insights that will help us do a better job |
|
in the formulation of those rules. |
|
Mr. Oxley. Let me ask Mr. Campbell, what about junk bonds? |
|
First of all, how would junk bonds be in this mix and how would |
|
they be treated? |
|
Mr. Campbell. At the current time, we have an existing |
|
system that collects information on high yield or junk bonds. |
|
We would expect to include that, as has already been determined |
|
by the committee, that we would collect and disseminate that |
|
information. That is--that decision has already been made. And, |
|
in fact, we can continue to use the FIPS system, as Chairman |
|
Levitt discussed, to continue to collect that information and |
|
dovetail that into the ultimate process. |
|
But at the current time, we have made available in our |
|
architecture of the collection system, every vendor out there, |
|
who has a terminal out there, including the development and |
|
building of a Web-based browser system to those firms, who do |
|
not have the technical expertise or the funding to go on a |
|
computer interface or subscribe to any of those services, we |
|
will allow them to have the input over a Web-based browser |
|
system for timely reporting, too. So, we fully expect and have |
|
already decided that we will include those securities in the |
|
timely reporting, as with the rest of the fixed income |
|
securities. |
|
Mr. Oxley. Thank you. Mr. Green, your plan is basically |
|
dealer to dealer? Do you see, at some point, the expansion of |
|
dealer to customer arrangement? |
|
Mr. Green. Well, within--the voluntary initiative, quite |
|
frankly, there's no question, we are not a regulator. We are |
|
not a self-regulator. The key element that we're trying to do |
|
is to get people, get firms, get market participants to |
|
volunteer to do something. And why we picked, you know, |
|
interdealer brokers and why we picked corporate--investment |
|
great corporate debt, in part, is because the FIPS program |
|
already exists. A lot of odd lot retail transactions are |
|
already covered by the New York Stock Exchange's ABS system. |
|
And we wanted to try to find something that currently wasn't |
|
hit by anything with the universe that we could get to |
|
volunteer, and to go beyond that voluntarily would probably be |
|
more difficult, as an overall industry. |
|
But, I think we need to see what the results of this effort |
|
are, and not a long timeframe for results. But, to see how this |
|
works, to see how useful the information is, to see the |
|
mechanism with which the information is distributed, to see if |
|
it's being used by investors, if it's being interpreted |
|
correctly, if it's being structured properly, and that will |
|
serve as a model for the steps beyond. |
|
Mr. Oxley. Thank you. My time has expired. The gentleman |
|
from New York. |
|
Mr. Towns. Thank you, very much, Mr. Chairman. Mr. |
|
Campbell, do you support the committee draft? |
|
Mr. Campbell. Yes, sir, we support it. |
|
Mr. Towns. Do you think there's anything that's not in |
|
there that should be in there? |
|
Mr. Campbell. No, sir. We believe that the committee draft |
|
encompasses the intent of the committee and the work that |
|
everybody is doing in this area. I think that we would support |
|
the draft document and we have--I had the pleasure of |
|
participating with this committee and the staff in the |
|
assistance and drafting. |
|
Mr. Towns. Mr. Green, same question. |
|
Mr. Green. The way the legislation is currently drafted, |
|
the Bond Market Association can support the current draft. |
|
Mr. Towns. What about any additional information that |
|
should be put in or anything that's left out that should be in? |
|
Mr. Green. Well, we might cross Ts differently or dot Is |
|
differently. But with the provisions that I talked about in my |
|
testimony, it provides a very balanced approach to ensuring |
|
that private sector initiatives and market liquidity are very |
|
much a part of the consideration of anything going forward. And |
|
for that, we would support it. |
|
Mr. Towns. The NASD says that they're uniquely situated to |
|
develop a system that moves for the public dissemination of |
|
bond transaction information. The Bond Market Association |
|
believes that an industry-sponsored solution is the best way to |
|
enhance transparency in the bond market. Who is right? |
|
Mr. Green. Well, we both are. Because if one---- |
|
Mr. Shimkus. We're the politicians. |
|
Mr. Green. Because if one could address all the needs of |
|
policymakers through voluntary industry efforts, one would |
|
surely choose to do it that way. But, I think it's incumbent |
|
upon industries to self-analyze and recognize that things that |
|
can be done, should be done. And then if things need to go |
|
further, that's when you may need the next step beyond |
|
voluntary, to a level of self-regulation. And if self- |
|
regulation doesn't work, you have regulation. And if regulation |
|
doesn't work, the Hill will produce legislation that will |
|
provide regulators with the means to do it. So, we're at the |
|
voluntary stage right now. |
|
Mr. Campbell. In last September's testimony, we weren't |
|
given a choice as to whether we wanted to do this or not. We |
|
were challenged by this committee and responded very directly |
|
to the SEC in their call for increased bond market |
|
transparency. We do believe that what we are doing also is a |
|
very industry-led solution. We have the largest to the smallest |
|
underwriters on the committee; we have firms that represent |
|
customers only; we have individuals, who represent specifically |
|
the individual investors; as well as the largest purchasers of |
|
corporate debt securities in the United States. |
|
So, we do believe that, although my friend and I and our |
|
associations differ on very minute, but important issues, that |
|
we have continued to make every effort to work together in a |
|
collegial fashion, to move this forward for the very best |
|
interest of the investor. We continue to gain insights on the |
|
committee from the representation of all the associations that |
|
really have an interest in this, from the Securities Industry |
|
Association, to the Bond Market Association, to the Association |
|
of American Investors. We believe that this effort that we're |
|
undertaking and have been in the process of is not going to be |
|
injurious to the industry. The industry is hard at work in the |
|
process to make this the finest resolution, to provide the |
|
transparency that they know how to provide. So, they are deeply |
|
involved and will continue to work with the Bond Market |
|
Association. And between all of us, we will have a product that |
|
we can be proud of and the investor will benefit from. |
|
Mr. Towns. I think you're saying you can work together? Is |
|
that what you're saying? |
|
Mr. Campbell. We plan to go to lunch very shortly here. |
|
We have been to dinner. We have served on the same panels. |
|
We're proud of our competitive instincts, but recognize that we |
|
have one final goal, and that's to get this to the investor, so |
|
the people benefit from increased information. |
|
Mr. Towns. Thank you, very much. And maybe you two guys |
|
should try breakfast. |
|
Mr. Campbell. We'll try it, thank you. |
|
Mr. Towns. I yield back, Mr. Chairman. |
|
Mr. Oxley. The gentleman's time has expired. The gentleman |
|
from Illinois, Mr. Shimkus. |
|
Mr. Shimkus. Thank you, Mr. Chairman. I apologize for not |
|
being here earlier. I had another subcommittee. You know, I'm |
|
very punctual. |
|
But energy power also is a big issue for Illinois and |
|
that's my other subcommittee. |
|
This question was asked to a previous panel, but I'd like |
|
to address it also to you both. Do you agree that price |
|
information is a public good? |
|
Mr. Campbell. Absolutely. We, in the NASDAQ market today, |
|
trade over a billion shares a day; have an infrastructure that |
|
not only collects and disseminates this information as widely |
|
as any other capital market in the world. We have a Website |
|
that dispenses this information free to the public that has, in |
|
excess, of 20 million hits a day. We spend close to $40 million |
|
a year in Web initiatives that are freely accessible to the |
|
public. There is nobody that is a strong believer, stronger |
|
than NASDAQ, that information and transparency is a positive. |
|
Mr. Shimkus. Mr. Green? |
|
Mr. Green. I would complement the Website, by the way. I |
|
have it book marked and it's really wonderful information. I |
|
guess the--I think prices information should be available to |
|
the public. There's no question about it. But the price |
|
information that the public can get free of charge is either |
|
delayed or paid for by someone else. Because, in a sense, |
|
market information overall is almost a form of intellectual |
|
property. So, where you draw the line between what's |
|
intellectual property and when does it become public domain, I |
|
think is an argument that lawyers can argue over many lunches, |
|
breakfasts, and dinners, and I don't have the answer for that. |
|
But, I think the public policy desire is to get price |
|
information to the public. And where it goes from being |
|
intellectual property that has a value that cost money, to |
|
something that becomes free of charge, is--I don't know where |
|
to draw that line. |
|
Mr. Shimkus. Is it safe to assume that dealers get a better |
|
deal than the public--the consumer? |
|
Mr. Campbell. I think that's probably not true. Today, if I |
|
am a public individual and I'm desirous of receiving real, on |
|
time, instantaneous quotes, I can presently do that for a |
|
maximum amount of only $4 a month, and we have and will have in |
|
front of our Board later on this month a proposal to |
|
essentially reduce that by half. Most of what happens in those |
|
charges are very accessible by any public individual. They can |
|
receive it on their PC at home; they can receive it on their |
|
pager; and there are many different avenues for them to get |
|
that. |
|
Mr. Shimkus. Mr. Green? |
|
Mr. Green. Well, if Pat's talking about cutting the fees |
|
that are paid by members, I have nothing to add. |
|
Mr. Shimkus. But, do you agree? I mean, the question really |
|
was---- |
|
Mr. Green. Dealers pay for the data. You know, when instead |
|
of going to nasdaq.com, you get the price through a dealer's |
|
Website, the dealers pay for that data. So---- |
|
Mr. Shimkus. There's a pass along charge for just |
|
information. |
|
Mr. Green. Right. Either direct or---- |
|
Mr. Shimkus. So, you made the argument, then, that if an |
|
individual consumer is buying direct, with the dealer, it's |
|
going to be an increased cost? |
|
Mr. Green. If the marketplace allows it to be passed along. |
|
It's a very competitive marketplace now driving down the cost |
|
of transactions and it's not always recoupable. |
|
Mr. Shimkus. Let me go to one last question. A lot of |
|
information is provided to regulators. Why can't investors get |
|
what is given to government bureaucrats? |
|
Mr. Campbell. That's an excellent question. We are in the |
|
process of implementing, over the next 12, 18 months, a system |
|
called an order audit trail. That is primarily an SEC driven |
|
initiative for equity securities. There is no reason why that |
|
can't ultimately be transferred to debt securities, whereby |
|
very possibly in the next 18 months, 24 months, you can |
|
actually go on the Website and find your specific order and be |
|
able to track it. And what the public wants more than anything |
|
is they want the price that they paid validated. And the way |
|
they validate it is to see other transactions along with |
|
theirs. |
|
Mr. Shimkus. Mr. Green, do you have anything to add? |
|
Mr. Green. Yeah, I would just say that we don't want to |
|
prejudge whether or not that's doable. But, that's where the |
|
issue of considering the effect of liquidity on the marketplace |
|
is crucial, because the difference between sending information |
|
to a regulator for surveillance and enforcement purposes and |
|
disseminating that same very information to the public, in this |
|
particular market where you're dealing with large wholesale |
|
institutional sized transactions, that can take actually some |
|
time to occur and unwind. The premature dissemination of |
|
information could affect the pricing of that transaction all |
|
along the way. |
|
But, we're not going to prejudge that. We feel that in |
|
designing a system that is going to provide for that price |
|
transparency, the effect on liquidity should be a |
|
consideration, because if it adversely affects liquidity, it |
|
will increase risks in that marketplace, and the dealer |
|
community puts up the capital to create the markets. But more |
|
importantly, the issuing community needs to get the lowest |
|
possible cost of capital. When AT&T comes to market later this |
|
week for $6 to $8 billion worth of bonds, our quarter-point |
|
here or a basis point there makes a lot of difference, and that |
|
happens when liquidity is good or liquidity is bad. So, all |
|
we're saying, in designing and fashioning a final system, |
|
liquidity should be a consideration, as it relates to the |
|
public dissemination, to ensure that the mere dissemination |
|
doesn't hurt the marketplace that you're trying to help. |
|
Mr. Shimkus. Mr. Chairman, my time has expired and I'll |
|
yield back. |
|
Mr. Oxley. I thank the gentleman for participation and we |
|
thank you both for a most enlightening testimony. I think we're |
|
on the right track and we appreciate all the hard work you've |
|
done on your side to make this a reality. Too many times from |
|
our perspective we nod in the right direction and say go to it, |
|
and don't give you a whole lot of encouragement. In this case, |
|
I think, it's a good example of the private sector initiative |
|
working very well at our directive, not necessarily in a |
|
dictatorial way, but in terms of a cooperative way. I think at |
|
the end of the day, that's exactly what's going to happen. It |
|
will benefit ultimately the marketplace and the consumer. |
|
So, thank you all for your testimony. And the subcommittee |
|
stands adjourn. |
|
[Whereupon, at 12:49 p.m., the subcommittee was adjourned.] |
|
[Additional material submitted for the record follows:] |
|
|
|
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T5636.001 |
|
|
|
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T5636.002 |
|
|
|
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T5636.003 |
|
|
|
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T5636.004 |
|
|
|
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T5636.005 |
|
|
|
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T5636.006 |
|
|
|
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T5636.007 |
|
|
|
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T5636.008 |
|
|
|
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T5636.009 |
|
|
|
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T5636.010 |
|
|
|
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T5636.011 |
|
|
|
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T5636.012 |
|
|
|
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T5636.013 |
|
|
|
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T5636.014 |
|
|
|
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T5636.015 |
|
|
|
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T5636.016 |
|
|
|
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T5636.017 |
|
|
|
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T5636.018 |
|
|
|
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T5636.019 |
|
|
|
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T5636.020 |
|
|
|
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T5636.021 |
|
|
|
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T5636.022 |
|
|
|
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T5636.023 |
|
|
|
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T5636.024 |
|
|
|
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T5636.025 |
|
|
|
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T5636.026 |
|
|
|
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T5636.027 |
|
|
|
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T5636.028 |
|
|
|
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T5636.029 |
|
|
|
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T5636.030 |
|
|
|
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T5636.031 |
|
|
|
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T5636.032 |
|
|
|
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T5636.033 |
|
|
|
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T5636.034 |
|
|
|
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T5636.035 |
|
|
|
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T5636.036 |
|
|
|
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T5636.037 |
|
|
|
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T5636.038 |
|
|
|
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T5636.039 |
|
|
|
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T5636.040 |
|
|
|
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T5636.041 |
|
|
|
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T5636.042 |
|
|
|
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T5636.043 |
|
|
|
|
|
</pre></body></html> |
|
|