|
<html> |
|
<title> - MARKUP OF H.R. 391, H.R. 1079, H.R. 1145, H.R. 1500, H.R. 1158, H.R. 1083, H.R. 1392, H.R. 1464, H.R. 256, H.R. 2118, H.Res. 245, H.R. 1934</title> |
|
<body><pre> |
|
[House Hearing, 117 Congress] |
|
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
MARKUP OF H.R. 391, H.R. 1079, H.R. 1145, H.R. 1500, H.R. 1158, H.R. |
|
1083, H.R. 1392, H.R. 1464, H.R. 256, H.R. 2118, H.Res. 245, H.R. 1934 |
|
|
|
======================================================================= |
|
|
|
MARKUP |
|
|
|
BEFORE THE |
|
|
|
COMMITTEE ON FOREIGN AFFAIRS |
|
HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES |
|
|
|
ONE HUNDRED SEVENTEENTH CONGRESS |
|
|
|
FIRST SESSION |
|
|
|
__________ |
|
|
|
March 25, 2021 |
|
|
|
__________ |
|
|
|
Serial No. 117-20 |
|
|
|
__________ |
|
|
|
Printed for the use of the Committee on Foreign Affairs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
[GRAPHIC(S) NOT AVAILABLE IN TIFF FORMAT] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Available: http://www.foreignaffairs.house.gov/, http:// |
|
docs.house.gov, |
|
or http://www.govinfo.gov |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
______ |
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. GOVERNMENT PUBLISHING OFFICE |
|
43-863 PDF WASHINGTON : 2021 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
COMMITTEE ON FOREIGN AFFAIRS |
|
|
|
GREGORY W. MEEKS, New York, Chairman |
|
|
|
BRAD SHERMAN, California MICHAEL T. McCAUL, Texas, Ranking |
|
ALBIO SIRES, New Jersey Member |
|
GERALD E. CONNOLLY, Virginia CHRISTOPHER H. SMITH, New Jersey |
|
THEODORE E. DEUTCH, Florida STEVE CHABOT, Ohio |
|
KAREN BASS, California JOE WILSON, South Carolina |
|
WILLIAM KEATING, Massachusetts SCOTT PERRY, Pennsylvania |
|
DAVID CICILLINE, Rhode Island DARRELL ISSA, California |
|
AMI BERA, California ADAM KINZINGER, Illinois |
|
JOAQUIN CASTRO, Texas LEE ZELDIN, New York |
|
DINA TITUS, Nevada ANN WAGNER, Missouri |
|
TED LIEU, California BRIAN MAST, Florida |
|
SUSAN WILD, Pennsylvania BRIAN FITZPATRICK, Pennsylvania |
|
DEAN PHILLIPS, Minnesota KEN BUCK, Colorado |
|
ILHAN OMAR, Minnesota TIM BURCHETT, Tennessee |
|
COLIN ALLRED, Texas MARK GREEN, Tennessee |
|
ANDY LEVIN, Michigan ANDY BARR, Kentucky |
|
ABIGAIL SPANBERGER, Virginia GREG STEUBE, Florida |
|
CHRISSY HOULAHAN, Pennsylvania DAN MEUSER, Pennsylvania |
|
TOM MALINOWSKI, New Jersey CLAUDIA TENNEY, New York |
|
ANDY KIM, New Jersey AUGUST PFLUGER, Texas |
|
SARA JACOBS, California PETER MEIJER, Michigan |
|
KATHY MANNING, North Carolina NICOLE MALLIOTAKIS, New York |
|
JIM COSTA, California RONNY JACKSON, Texas |
|
JUAN VARGAS, California YOUNG KIM, California |
|
VICENTE GONZALEZ, Texas MARIA ELVIRA SALAZAR, Florida |
|
BRAD SCHNEIDER, Illinois |
|
|
|
|
|
Sophia Lafargue, Staff Director |
|
|
|
|
|
Brendan Shields, Republican Staff Director |
|
|
|
C O N T E N T S |
|
|
|
---------- |
|
Page |
|
|
|
BILLS AND AMENDMENTS EN BLOC |
|
|
|
Bill H.R. 391.................................................... 20 |
|
Amendment to H.R. 391 offered by Mr. Connolly.................... 38 |
|
Amendment to H.R. 391 offered by Mr. McCaul...................... 47 |
|
Amendment to H.R. 391 offered by Mr. Chabot...................... 76 |
|
Amendment offered by Mr. Perry to the Amendment offered by Mr. |
|
Chabot......................................................... 86 |
|
Amendment offered by Mr. Perry to the Amendment offered by Mr. |
|
Chabot......................................................... 89 |
|
Amendment offered by Mr. Perry to the Amendment offered by Mr. |
|
Chabot......................................................... 95 |
|
Amendment to H.R. 391 offered by Mr. Perry....................... 100 |
|
Bill H.R. 2118................................................... 108 |
|
Amendment to H.R. 2118 offered by Mr. Perry...................... 116 |
|
Bill H.R. 1464................................................... 120 |
|
Amendment to H.R. 1464 offered by Mr. Malinowski................. 134 |
|
Amendment to H.R. 1464 offered by Mr. Malinowski................. 138 |
|
Amendment to H.R. 1464 offered by Ms. Omar....................... 147 |
|
Bill H.R. 256.................................................... 156 |
|
Amendment to H.R. 256 offered by Mr. Perry....................... 176 |
|
Amendment to H.R. 256 offered by Mr. Issa........................ 180 |
|
|
|
APPENDIX |
|
|
|
Hearing Notice................................................... 193 |
|
Hearing Minutes.................................................. 194 |
|
Hearing Attendance............................................... 195 |
|
Bills and Amendments............................................. 196 |
|
Votes............................................................ 387 |
|
Markup Summary................................................... 390 |
|
Information for the Record....................................... 392 |
|
|
|
|
|
MARKUP OF H.R. 391, H.R. 1079, H.R. 1145, H.R. 1500, H.R. 1158, H.R. |
|
1083, H.R. 1392, H.R. 1464, H.R. 256, H.R. 2118, H.Res. 245, H.R. 1934 |
|
|
|
Thursday, March 25, 2021 |
|
|
|
House of Representatives, |
|
Committee on Foreign Affairs, |
|
Washington, DC. |
|
|
|
The committee met, pursuant to notice, at 1:15 p.m., via |
|
Webex, Hon. Gregory Meeks (chairman of the committee) |
|
presiding. |
|
Chairman Meeks. The Committee on Foreign Affairs will come |
|
to order. Without objection, the chair is authorized to declare |
|
a recess of the committee at any point. |
|
Pursuant to Committee Rule 4, the chair may postpone |
|
further proceedings on approving any measure or matter or |
|
adopting an amendment. Without objection, all members will have |
|
5 days to submit statements or extraneous materials on today's |
|
business. |
|
To say something into the record, please have your staff |
|
email the previously circulated address or contact full |
|
committee staff. |
|
As a reminder to members, please keep your video function |
|
on at all times, even when you are not recognized by the chair. |
|
Members are responsible for muting and unmuting themselves, and |
|
please remember to mute yourself after you finish speaking. |
|
Consistent with House rules, staff will only mute members |
|
as appropriate and they are not under recognition to eliminate |
|
background noise. |
|
I see we have a quorum. As members were notified yesterday, |
|
we intend to first consider eight measures and their amendments |
|
en bloc. And then we will move to consider four measures and |
|
their amendments separately. |
|
Any roll call votes will be postponed until the end of the |
|
markup. |
|
Pursuant to notice, for purposes of markup, I now call up |
|
the measures and their amendments that were previously |
|
circulated to members' offices which without objection will be |
|
considered en bloc that each measure is considered as read and |
|
the amendments to each are considered as read and are agreed |
|
to. |
|
Without objection, after remarks, the committee will vote |
|
to order the measures favorably reported en bloc, as amended if |
|
amended, and each member or amendments to each bill shall be |
|
reported as a single amendment in the nature of a substitute. |
|
The measures in the en bloc package are H.R. 1145, To |
|
direct the Secretary of State to develop a strategy to regain |
|
observer status for Taiwan in the World Health Organization, |
|
and for other purposes, with the Meeks amendment in the nature |
|
of a substitute. |
|
H.R. 1500, To direct the Administrator of the USAID to |
|
submit to Congress a report on the impact of the COVID-19 |
|
pandemic on global basic education programs, with a Houlahan |
|
amendment in the nature of a substitute and a Perry amendment. |
|
H.R. 1158, To provide women and girls safe access to |
|
sanitation facilities in refugee camps. |
|
H.R. 1083, Southeast Asia Strategy Act. |
|
H. Res. 245, Calling for continued and robust international |
|
collaboration and coordination to fight COVID-19 across Africa, |
|
with a Bass amendment in the nature of a substitute. |
|
H.R. 1079, Desert Locust Control Act, with a Smith |
|
amendment and a Perry amendment. |
|
H.R. 1934, Promoting United States International Leadership |
|
in 5G, with a McCaul amendment and with another McCaul |
|
amendment. |
|
H.R. 1392, Protection of Saudi Dissidents Act of 2021, with |
|
a Connolly amendment and a Meeks amendment. |
|
I now recognize myself to speak on the en bloc package. I |
|
support all of these bipartisan measures and I am grateful to |
|
all of our members on both sides for their hard work and |
|
Ranking Member McCaul. |
|
The legislation in our en bloc is reflective of an |
|
overarching theme of this markup: global health. Over the last |
|
year, it has become apparent to the entire world that viruses |
|
do not respect borders and that problems that develop on one |
|
side of the world can devastate people halfway around the |
|
globe. |
|
Since COVID-19 was first detected, trillions of dollars of |
|
global economic output had evaporated and over one billion |
|
children have missed in-person schooling. According to the WHO, |
|
over 2.7 million people around the world have lost their lives |
|
to coronavirus. Of course, the old adage one million deaths is |
|
a statistic, one death is a tragedy is relevant to the COVID-19 |
|
pandemic. No figure can truly capture the suffering, |
|
heartbreak, and loss that the virus has caused. |
|
I can vividly remember when we were at the height of the |
|
pandemic in New York City exactly 1 year ago today when so many |
|
people in my community were saying their final goodbyes to |
|
loved ones or thinking about how they were going to pay their |
|
rent and the rent after they were laid off. |
|
Similarly, scenes have been repeated, not just over all of |
|
our great country, but indeed around the entire world. With |
|
Representative Karen Bass' resolution calling for decisive |
|
action to assist African nations is exactly the formula we |
|
should be putting forward in Africa and indeed around the |
|
world. |
|
This resolution demands the U.S. Government to support |
|
efforts to distribute vaccines to Africa to support the GAVI |
|
Alliance and COVAX Facilities and calls for continued and |
|
aggressive efforts to address other unfortunate consequences of |
|
the pandemic. |
|
I would also like to thank Representative Bass for her work |
|
with Representative Smith of the important legislation to |
|
address the locust swarms that are exacerbating food insecurity |
|
in parts of East Africa. |
|
Representative Grace Meng also has an instrumental bill |
|
that will address one of the at-risk populations in the entire |
|
world, women and girls living in refugee camps. Often, these |
|
camps around the world do not provide safe and secure |
|
infrastructure to protect the tens of millions of women and |
|
girls that reside in them. This bill will work to ensure safe |
|
and secure access to sanitation facilities for these women and |
|
girls. |
|
Representative Houlahan's legislation, H.R. 1500, requires |
|
a report on the impact of COVID-19 from USAID basic education |
|
programs. As a global humanitarian leader, we must understand |
|
the effect of the pandemic on education if we are going to |
|
effectively address the consequences. This legislation will |
|
provide us the insights we need to fix the problems of the day |
|
and plan for the problems of tomorrow. |
|
I am also proud to support a trio of bipartisan bills that |
|
will bring renewed attention and call for carefully developed |
|
strategies to a number of important issues, particularly with a |
|
focus on Asia. |
|
Representative Kim's bill calls for a State Department |
|
strategy to get Taiwan observer status again at the WHO. |
|
Representative McCaul's legislation addresses 5G networks |
|
and the importance of American leadership from global telecoms |
|
technology. |
|
Representative Wagner, working with Representative Castro, |
|
also has an important role that calls on Secretaries of State |
|
and Commerce to develop a strategy to engage with ASEAN and |
|
South Asian nations. |
|
And finally, Representative Connolly's bill the Protection |
|
of Saudi Dissidents Act. Saudi Arabia is a long-standing U.S. |
|
partner in a complex region. Nonetheless, for far too long, |
|
Saudi Arabia's routine suppression of free expression and |
|
political dissidents has gone unaddressed. This legislation |
|
imposes reasonable limits on U.S. weapons transfer to Saudi |
|
intelligence agencies shown to be involved in the killing of |
|
Jamal Khashoggi and other political repression until such |
|
repression and abuse of dissidents abates. |
|
To be clear, I want to be clear, the bill does not limit |
|
U.S. arm transfers to Saudi's defensive capabilities and Mr. |
|
Connolly has graciously incorporated my amendment which ensures |
|
that nothing in this legislation will deny the Saudi Government |
|
the ability to defend its territory against attacks, from |
|
external threats, or hinder its ability to defend the United |
|
States military, diplomatic personnel, or facilities in the |
|
kingdom. |
|
I strongly support all the measures that we are considering |
|
today in the en bloc. And I urge all members to join me to do |
|
the same. |
|
I will now recognize our Ranking Member, Mr. McCaul of |
|
Texas, for his remarks. |
|
Mr. McCaul. Thank you, Chairman Meeks. And I want to thank |
|
you for holding this important markup and moving several |
|
important bills. I want to thank you for carrying on the |
|
traditions of this committee, working in a bipartisan manner |
|
and I want to thank the staff on both sides of the aisle for |
|
their hard work leading up to this markup. |
|
I want to point out three bills from my Republican |
|
colleagues, one, Representative Smith's Desert Locust Control |
|
Act; Representative Wagner, Southeast Asia Strategy Act; and |
|
Representative Kim's bill directing the Secretary of State to |
|
develop a strategy to regain observer status for Taiwan in the |
|
World Health Organization. It is important to note, Mr. |
|
Chairman, that Taiwan actually warned the Chinese Communist |
|
Party and the WHO that COVID was transmittable to the human and |
|
that warning went unheeded sadly and now we are in the |
|
situation we are in. |
|
I also want to thank Representatives Connolly, Chabot, and |
|
you, Mr. Chairman, for working with me on what I think are |
|
strong amendments to help improve the Global Health Security |
|
Act. It is critical that we apply the painful lessons learned |
|
from this pandemic so that we are better prepared in the |
|
future. I appreciate all of you for approaching such an |
|
important issue in a bipartisan manner. |
|
I also want to thank Mr. Connolly for working with us on a |
|
compromised text that we got to within a matter of days for his |
|
Protection of Saudi Dissidents Act, and Mr. Chairman, thank you |
|
for your amendments because that is what got us to yes on this |
|
bill. It does not prohibit in any way Saudi's ability to obtain |
|
weapons to defend itself. |
|
The killing of Jamal Khashoggi, a prominent Saudi |
|
journalist was an outrageously gruesome crime. It was also a |
|
major setback for our relationship with Saudi Arabia. This |
|
amendment will help us better use our leverage to push |
|
improvements in the kingdom's human rights practices. It will |
|
also help preserve our strategic interest in the Middle East |
|
including, as I mentioned, Saudi's ability to defend itself |
|
against an attack from Iran. |
|
I am also pleased that we are considering my bill to |
|
promoting U.S. international leadership in the 5G Act. The |
|
Chinese Communist Party poses a generational threat to our |
|
country that we can no longer ignore. They are erasing ethnic |
|
groups in Xinjiang right now with the Muslim Uyghurs. They |
|
stole American national security data in the OPM hack including |
|
mine and are believed to be responsible for the Microsoft hack |
|
earlier this month. Now the Chinese Communist Party has designs |
|
to become the world's technology powers especially on 5G with |
|
their Huawei surveillance telecom program. |
|
To achieve their goal, the CCP is launching cyber-attacks |
|
stealing intellectual property and spying on our companies and |
|
research institutions. That is precisely why in Houston, in my |
|
State, the consulate was shut down because they were stealing |
|
from the Texas Medical Center biomedical research, including |
|
research on the vaccine, and from NASA. They used that to |
|
increase their participation at standard setting bodies like |
|
the International Telecommunications Union, or ITU, to embed |
|
their technology around the world. And with the full backing of |
|
the CCP, military companies like Huawei have gained significant |
|
global market share in 5G and are positioning themselves to |
|
gain even more. |
|
My bill will help the United States counter China's |
|
aggressive 5G expansion around the world by maintaining and in |
|
some cases increasing U.S. leadership and participation at |
|
critical international standard setting bodies for 5G. |
|
Specifically, it will allow our Government to better understand |
|
the security risks posed by the CCP's participation in 5G |
|
standard setting bodies. Setting 5G standards and increasing |
|
cooperation between the United States and our allies and |
|
partners puts us in the driver's seat for the future, not the |
|
CCP. |
|
So Mr. Chairman, with that, I look forward to a healthy |
|
debate on all the measures and I want to say I think we all |
|
agree that we need to exercise our Article 1 authorities. We'll |
|
be debating AUMF. We just have a little different position on |
|
that, but as we always do, we'll debate in very civil and an |
|
educational way. Thank you so much for holding this markup. I |
|
yield back. |
|
Chairman Meeks. I thank you for that, Representative |
|
McCaul, and yes, we will be very civil as we markup as we |
|
always do. Thank you for that. |
|
I will recognize members by committee seniority alternating |
|
between Democrats and Republicans for the purpose of speaking |
|
on the en bloc package. Please use the raise your hand function |
|
on Webex and I will recognize members by committee seniority |
|
alternating between Democrats and Republicans. If you miss your |
|
turn, please let our staff know, and we will come back to you. |
|
Does anyone wish to speak on the en bloc? |
|
Mr. Sherman. Mr. Chairman? |
|
Chairman Meeks. Yes. I recognize, Representative Brad |
|
Sherman of California for 5 minutes. |
|
Mr. Sherman. Mr. Chairman, I want to thank you for taking |
|
up H.R. 1145 to direct the Secretary of State to develop a |
|
strategy to regain observer status for Taiwan. I think it |
|
should be full status, but we will start with observer status |
|
for Taiwan at the World Health Organization. I am glad to join |
|
with Representative Young Kim, who is the lead Democrat on this |
|
important bill. |
|
Just in the short amount of time that I have been in |
|
Congress, Taiwan has spent more than $6 billion providing |
|
international medical and humanitarian needs to more than 80 |
|
countries. Furthermore, Taiwan has used its public health |
|
expertise to respond to this pandemic effectively within its |
|
borders while donating tens of millions of masks and PPE |
|
equipment to other nations in need. |
|
Due to the Chinese Communist Party, Taiwan was excluded |
|
from the WHO in 2017. This is outrageous as it shuts out Taiwan |
|
from important WHO information and makes it more difficult for |
|
Taiwan to share the information it has on its successful |
|
handling on the virus. And as Mr. McCaul points out, it was one |
|
of the first countries to ring the bell and to show us that |
|
indeed this disease is transmissible. |
|
Following Tuesday's important hearings on Reclaiming |
|
Congress's War Powers Act, it is fitting that we will move on |
|
to H.R. 256, which I am pleased to cosponsor, To repeal the |
|
Authorization of Use of Military Force Against Iraq in 2002, |
|
AUMF. I have long supported this and voted for the repeal of |
|
this AUMF. The AUMF was there to protect us from Saddam |
|
Hussein's what we thought were weapons of mass destruction. It |
|
has clearly outlived its usefulness. |
|
But we also need to make sure that the War Powers Act is |
|
fully enforceable against any administration. We had excellent |
|
witnesses in our hearing on Tuesday. We need a provision that |
|
gives Congress, Members of Congress, standing to go to court |
|
and as I have championed since 2011, we had a major floor vote |
|
on this in 2011. It has now been part of every appropriations |
|
bill. We must use our power of the first to say no money shall |
|
be spent in contravention of the War Powers Act. We need now to |
|
make this part of permanent law. I have introduced a bill with |
|
30 cosponsors, H.R. 2108, that will do just that and whether it |
|
is in that legislative vehicle or another legislative vehicle, |
|
we need to make the War Powers Act enforceable against |
|
presidents. |
|
Mr. Connolly has put forward a good bill, H.R. 1392, |
|
Protection of the Saudi Dissidents Act and others have spoken |
|
about how important that is. And Mr. Malinowski has another |
|
bill that I believe that is important, 1464, the Khashoggi |
|
Accountability Act, demanding visa sanctions on anyone being |
|
responsible for Khashoggi's killing. And of course, that bill |
|
has important waivers in there for diplomatic visas. |
|
Finally, I want to thank Chairman Bass for her resolution |
|
calling for a new, decisive, and robust international |
|
cooperation on the fight against COVID-19 across Africa. I was |
|
just on the phone with Dr. Marx, the Director of the FDA's |
|
Center for Biologics about how we are wasting vaccine here in |
|
the United States and how we can improve our own program, thus |
|
saving vaccine which can be used by the United States, but then |
|
around the world, particularly in Africa. |
|
I want to commend Mr. Bera for his bill, Securing America |
|
from Epidemics Act. And finally, although it is not in this |
|
package, I do have almost a minute left, I want to comment on |
|
Mr. Perry's amendment dealing with the Wuhan lab. I will point |
|
out that Congress has already mandated in the omnibus that we |
|
get a report. That report is due in just a few days. That |
|
report should be on the origins of this virus. If that report |
|
is going to be adequate, it will answer a question a lot of us |
|
have and that is what did escape from the Wuhan virology |
|
laboratory. If that report fails to address that issue, then it |
|
will be defined for Congress to go back and mandate that that |
|
particular issue be the subject of a serious intelligence |
|
community report to Congress. I yield back. |
|
Chairman Meeks. The gentleman yields back. |
|
Mr. Smith. Mr. Chairman? |
|
Chairman Meeks. Yes. The chair recognizes Representative |
|
Chris Smith of New Jersey who is the Ranking Member on the |
|
Subcommittee of Africa, Global Health, and Global Human Rights |
|
for 5 minutes. |
|
Mr. Smith. Thank you very much, Mr. Chairman. I want to |
|
thank you and Ranking Member McCaul for including H.R. 1079, |
|
the Desert Locust Control Act in today's markup. H.R. 1079, |
|
which I introduced, joined by Africa Subcommittee Chair Karen |
|
Bass, will establish an inter-agency working group to develop a |
|
comprehensive, strategic plan to control locust outbreaks in |
|
the East Africa region and address future outbreaks in order to |
|
avert mass scale food insecurity and potential political |
|
destabilization. |
|
According to USAID, Mr. Chairman, the desert locust is one |
|
of the most destructive migratory pests in the world, rapidly |
|
consuming most vegetation in its path including crops and |
|
pasture land, critical to maintaining the food security and |
|
livelihood of populations in East Africa. Locust swarms are |
|
highly mobile. And carried on the wind, swarms can travel up to |
|
100 miles per day. And even a relatively small four-tenths of 1 |
|
percent square mile size swarm can consume an amount of food |
|
sufficient for approximately 35,000 people in 1 day. |
|
The World Bank notes that and I quote, ``A new generation |
|
of locusts emerge every 8 weeks. Each generation on average |
|
seeks a twentyfold increase in the population. The growing |
|
swarms spread to new areas, disrupting the food supply, |
|
upending livelihoods, and requiring substantial resources to |
|
address.'' |
|
At the end of the year, Mr. Chairman, as you know, some 42 |
|
million people in East Africa alone were suffering acute food |
|
insecurity and this does not include the Gulf States such as |
|
Yemen or India or Pakistan which are also highly impacted. |
|
Acute food insecurity is defined as the sudden lack of food or |
|
the ability to produce or access minimum requirements of food. |
|
The theme for the legislation came about with the |
|
realization last year that various agencies in the Federal |
|
Government which shared partial responsibility for addressing |
|
the compounding locust, food, and COVID crises were not |
|
adequately coordinating their efforts and thus not achieving |
|
the best possible outcome. This including not only the State |
|
Department, USAID, but also the NSD, the Department of Defense, |
|
and the Department of Agriculture. It is in large part, thanks |
|
to the herculean efforts of our Ambassador to the U.N. Food |
|
Agencies in Rome, Kip Tom; the Executive Director of the World |
|
Food Program, former Governor David Beasley, that awareness of |
|
this crisis and steps to mitigate it have been at least a |
|
partial success. They prodded countries, all of which were |
|
under a COVID lockdown, in the FAO into action, without which |
|
we would have had an even greater food security crisis. |
|
The crisis persists, Mr. Chairman, and the upsurge in |
|
locusts continues. The bill will help coordinate our |
|
Government's response and it will do it at a de minimis cost. |
|
And what is the cost of not acting? In testimony last week |
|
before the Africa Subcommittee in a hearing chaired by my |
|
friend and colleague and Congresswoman Bass, Ambassador Tip Tom |
|
noted that today some $240 million has been spent to address |
|
the crisis. Of this, USAID provided some $26 million in |
|
assistance, as of February 1st of this year for Fiscal Years |
|
2020 and for 1921. |
|
The German Government has provided the largest amount of |
|
assistance to combat the locusts. But if this blows up into a |
|
full-scale famine, abetted by on-going hostilities in Ethiopia, |
|
Ambassador Tom estimates that the humanitarian cost will |
|
balloon to $3 to $3.5 billion. And that would mean millions of |
|
lives, lives potentially lost to a horrific death by |
|
starvation, and implicate U.S.'s disaster assistance funding. |
|
So again, I am glad that you are putting this up on the markup |
|
today and I hope my colleagues will cosponsor and support the |
|
bill. |
|
I also want to voice my support to my good friend and |
|
colleague, Karen Bass's Resolution 245, calling for a continued |
|
and robust international collaboration and coordination to |
|
fight COVID-19 across Africa. |
|
Mr. Chairman, in 2020, Africa had fewer COVID deaths, about |
|
3.5 percent of the world cases, according to the African |
|
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and fewer deaths |
|
than other parts of the world. However--and that is |
|
attributable in part to robust containment and a younger |
|
population which were factors. But the emergence of variants |
|
that are more transmissible and deadly has now resulted in a |
|
fatality rate in 2021 that is above the global average. |
|
And finally, I want to thank Congresswoman Young Kim for |
|
her bill, as well as all the bills today, but I just want to |
|
make sure I point this one out because we need a strategy with |
|
Taiwan to gain observer status at the WHO and I wanted again to |
|
remind my colleagues, I know you all know this, Taiwan has been |
|
a model citizen in how it engages the world with regards to |
|
health crises and its exclusion from the WHO at the behest of |
|
the Chinese Communist Party is a scandal. |
|
I thank you, Mr. Chairman, and I ask unanimous consent to |
|
revise and add some additional remarks. |
|
Chairman Meeks. Thank you. I now recognize Representative |
|
Albio Sires of New Jersey, who is the chair of the Subcommittee |
|
on the Western Hemisphere, Civilian Security, Migration, and |
|
International Economic Policy, for 5 minutes. |
|
Mr. Sires. Thank you, Mr. Chairman. I want say from the |
|
beginning that I support all these bills, but I want to speak |
|
briefly about H.R. 1145, important legislation to help Taiwan |
|
regain the status as an observer in the World Health |
|
Organization. Taiwan has long been a leader in global health as |
|
shown most recently throughout the ongoing pandemic. Not only |
|
did Taiwan manage the pandemic at home, it worked to share |
|
equipment and expertise with other nations including the United |
|
States. |
|
I am particularly grateful for Taiwan's strong friendship |
|
in the early days of this crisis when my home State of New |
|
Jersey was extremely hard hit and personal protective equipment |
|
was scarce. Taiwan was sending regular shipments of masks to |
|
the United States. By regaining observer status in the WHO, |
|
Taiwan has helped other nations who are struggling with this |
|
pandemic. It is in the best global interest to have Taiwan |
|
regain observer status in the World Health Organization so that |
|
other nations can learn from Taiwan's success in battling |
|
COVID-19 and can be kept up to date on this international |
|
health emergency. |
|
As the co-chair of the congressional Taiwan Caucus I am |
|
proud to co-sponsor H.R. 1145. I would like to thank my |
|
colleagues, Representatives Young Kim and Brad Sherman, for |
|
introducing this important legislation and I urge my colleagues |
|
to support it. |
|
Thank you, Mr. Chairman. |
|
Chairman Meeks. The gentleman yields back. I now recognize |
|
Representative Steve Chabot of Ohio, who is the Ranking Member |
|
of the Subcommittee on Asia, the Pacific, Central Asia, and |
|
Nonproliferation for 5 minutes. |
|
Mr. Chabot. Thank you, Mr. Chairman. I want to voice my |
|
strong support, first, for H.R. 391, the Global Health Security |
|
Act, bipartisan legislation that my good friend Gerry Connolly |
|
and I first introduced in 2018 to strengthen U.S. and global |
|
preparedness for and capacity to respond to pandemics like |
|
COVID-19. |
|
And I want to thank Chairman Meeks and Ranking Member |
|
McCaul for working with us to improve this Congress' version of |
|
the legislation as it heads toward enactment. |
|
After a year of lockdowns and masks and social distancing, |
|
working from home, school closures, and, worst of all, a |
|
mounting death toll both here at home and around the world, |
|
COVID-19 has taught us like nothing else has the true cost of a |
|
pandemic. |
|
COVID-19 has also shown just how vulnerable the U.S. is to |
|
a disease outbreak on the other side of the world. As we all |
|
know now, diseases do not respect borders, and a corrupt and |
|
nontransparent health system in another country, in this case |
|
China, can cause millions of deaths here in America. |
|
China's politically motivated censorship of coronavirus |
|
information early on caused the world untold suffering. But a |
|
disease like COVID-19 could start anywhere. It could start in |
|
the Middle East, in South America, Africa, or even here. |
|
That's why we must help less-prepared countries identify |
|
and contain future emergency deadly diseases when they |
|
originate, and mitigate their impact before they have a chance |
|
to grow to pandemic scale. |
|
If I may say, our legislation was prescient in this regard. |
|
When we first introduced it back in 2018, COVID-19 did not |
|
exist. |
|
However, we realized that Congress needed to support, |
|
direct, and provide oversight for the global health security |
|
work that had been done by the Obama Administration and carried |
|
forward by the Trump administration. |
|
We also realized that the proper personnel needed to be in |
|
place to coordinate our response to emerging disease threats. |
|
Our legislation supports each of these goals and so I |
|
strongly support it and would urge my colleagues to do so as |
|
well. I'd like to comment briefly on two other pieces of |
|
legislation that we have before us today. |
|
I want to these--the first one I'd like to mention as a |
|
founder and a current co-chair of the congressional Taiwan |
|
Caucus, as a couple of the members have already mentioned, also |
|
as the ranking member of the Asian Pacific Subcommittee, I'd |
|
like to voice my support for H.R. 1145. |
|
I'm an original co-sponsor of this legislation, which was |
|
introduced by a vice ranking member in one of our new and, I |
|
think, one of our best committee members will be for sure, |
|
Young Kim, as well as Congressman Brad Sherman, who is pretty |
|
good, too, to strengthen the State Department's efforts to get |
|
Taiwan included by the World Health Organization, and I long |
|
supported Taiwan's participation in international |
|
organizations. |
|
The 23 million people of Taiwan deserve to have their |
|
voices heard. So I strongly support this, would urge my |
|
colleagues to support this as well. |
|
And then, finally, I'd like to mention briefly H.R. 1500, |
|
of the Global Learning Loss Assessment Act, which was |
|
introduced by Ms. Houlahan and Mr. Fitzpatrick. |
|
In 2017, I introduced the Girls Access to Education Act, |
|
along with my Democratic colleague, Congresswoman Robin Kelly, |
|
here in the House, and then Senator Rubio introduced it over in |
|
the Senate. |
|
This legislation, which ultimately did become law, |
|
prioritized education in our humanitarian assistance to |
|
displaced individuals. |
|
Unfortunately, COVID-19 has set that work back |
|
significantly. The pandemic has taken a serious toll on |
|
education as countries around the globe have closed down their |
|
school systems. |
|
Worse, millions of children, especially girls, have dropped |
|
out of school as a result of the pandemic and may never return |
|
to the classroom in some of those countries across the globe. |
|
H.R. 1500 is a critical step in understanding this problem |
|
and getting a grasp of who is being impacted and how so that we |
|
can craft an effective response as the pandemic comes to an |
|
end. |
|
So thank you, Mr. Chairman, for holding this markup, and I |
|
want to thank Mr. McCaul, our ranking member, on this as well. |
|
It's good to see us working in a bipartisan manner. And I yield |
|
back. |
|
Chairman Meeks. Thank you. The gentleman yields back. |
|
I now recognize Representative Gerry Connolly of Virginia, |
|
who's the president of the NATO Parliamentarian Assembly, for 5 |
|
minutes. |
|
Mr. Connolly. Thank you, Mr. Chairman. Thank you so much |
|
for holding this markup. It's great to see the committee |
|
actively moving on its legislation under your leadership and |
|
that of Mr. McCaul. |
|
I want to join Mr. Chabot, as the co-chair of the Taiwan |
|
Caucus, in expressing specific support for H.R. 745. I think |
|
it's vitally important that we include Taiwan in the family, |
|
international family, especially when it comes to international |
|
health issues during a pandemic. It's absurd not to include the |
|
Taiwanese expertise and experience. And I congratulate both |
|
Brad Sherman and Young Kim for bringing that bill before us. |
|
And I'm pleased to support it. |
|
I also want to thank you, Mr. Chairman, and you, Mr. |
|
McCaul, for your bipartisan leadership in putting together an |
|
en bloc package of legislation, and I particularly want to |
|
thank you for including the Saudi Dissidents Act. |
|
You know, we had a lot of hurdles to overcome. We have |
|
managed with your help and your input to improve the bill and |
|
to make it something that is a strong bipartisan bill. I think |
|
that's very important. |
|
Jamal Khashoggi was my constituent. His brutal murder must |
|
not be forgotten and there has to be justice. This bill will be |
|
a vehicle for moving us toward eventful justice, and I might |
|
add that it isn't just about Jamal Khashoggi, bad as that was. |
|
It's also about protecting dissidents. I've met--this bill |
|
grew out of a series of meetings I had with Saudi dissidents |
|
and Saudi American families who have folks back home who are |
|
being imprisoned and detained simply because they have a |
|
different political point of view and not a radical one, just |
|
one like Jamal Khashoggi's, to try to improve things in the |
|
kingdom, and there is no tolerance for that dissent. |
|
And people are being killed. They're being detained. |
|
They're being tortured. They're being brutalized. We, as |
|
Americans, we, as the House Foreign Affairs Committee, cannot |
|
stand idle during that time. And just in the last 48 hours, if |
|
we needed a reminder of how important this subject is, we |
|
learned that the author of the U.N. report on the murder of |
|
Jamal Khashoggi, Agnes Callamard, has been threatened by Saudi |
|
officials. |
|
Her safety has been threatened if she continues to persist |
|
in her findings. That is impunity of the of the highest order |
|
of magnitude, and that, I think, underscores why we cannot be |
|
silent, why we must take this measure today. |
|
And I'm very proud of the fact we are, I hope, going to do |
|
this in a very broad bipartisan way, in a measured but |
|
assertive way. |
|
And finally, Mr. Chairman, all of the bills are worthy and |
|
are certainly going to have my support in the en bloc package. |
|
But I want to also thank you and Mr. McCaul for your support, |
|
and Mr. Chabot for his support. He's been unwavering for 3 |
|
years. And, you know, we look back on it and maybe we |
|
anticipated something in terms of the need for early monitoring |
|
of global health developments that could lead to pandemic. |
|
Well, it happened. And on a bipartisan basis, we have never |
|
picked one administration over another. We believe that we have |
|
got to restore that capacity by code, by law, whoever is the |
|
president, and Mr. Chabot has been a wonderful Republican |
|
partner in that effort. And it has not always been easy. It's |
|
passed the House, I believe, four times, and we hope it will |
|
come out of our committee today on a big bipartisan vote. |
|
And, again, I want to thank Mr. McCaul and you, Mr. |
|
Chairman, for thoughtful additions to this bill that make it |
|
stronger, and I would hope the committee upon reflection will |
|
maybe not yield to the temptation to burden it down with other |
|
issues that could make this very difficult to pass. |
|
It's passed four times. It's passed the test in the House. |
|
I believe we're very close to getting support in the Senate |
|
that would allow it to become law, and let's try to do that |
|
during the middle of a pandemic on a bipartisan basis. |
|
But, again, I thank you and Mr. McCaul for making that |
|
work. I yield back. |
|
Chairman Meeks. The gentleman yields back. |
|
I now recognize Representative Joe Wilson of South |
|
Carolina, who's the ranking member of the Subcommittee on the |
|
Middle East, North Africa, and Global Counterterrorism, for 5 |
|
minutes. |
|
Mr. Wilson. Thank you, Chairman Gregory Meeks and Ranking |
|
Member Michael McCaul, for bringing these bipartisan measures |
|
before us today. |
|
I support each of the eight bills. I am grateful for the |
|
wisdom and the initiative by our new colleague, Representative |
|
Young Kim, with H.R. 1145. Taiwan has contributed tremendously |
|
to global health but has not participated in the World Health |
|
Assembly as an observer country since 2017. |
|
Following the election of President Tsai Ing-wen, efforts |
|
to curtail Taiwan's increasing international participation has |
|
been persistent. International challenges such as the ongoing |
|
pandemic require international cooperation. |
|
I'm deeply concerned by the amount of undue influence |
|
Beijing wields over international organizations, especially |
|
given their repeated concealment of information during the |
|
pandemic. |
|
I'm grateful for Taiwan's voluntary generosity during the |
|
pandemic. At the height of the supply chain strain, Taiwan |
|
generously donated 100,000 items of PPE to the citizens of |
|
South Carolina for front line workers, which my office helped |
|
to facilitate. |
|
Congratulations to Representative Young Kim, Congressman |
|
Brad Sherman, Congressman Albio Sires, Congressman Steve |
|
Chabot, and Congressman Gerry Connolly for their work on this |
|
measure. |
|
It is so meaningful to me to see the bipartisan support for |
|
the courageous people of Taiwan. |
|
I yield back. |
|
Chairman Meeks. The gentleman yields back. |
|
I now recognize Representative Ted Deutch of Florida, who |
|
is the chair of the Subcommittee on the Middle East, North |
|
Africa, and Global Counterterrorism for, 5 minutes. |
|
Mr. Deutch. Thank you very much, Mr. Chairman, for your |
|
continued leadership and ensuring that we accomplish meaningful |
|
work, while also asserting our authorities. |
|
Thanks to Ranking Member McCaul for continuing to work in |
|
good faith and in the spirit of bipartisanship. |
|
I'm proud to support the measures before us today, the en |
|
bloc. I also would like to comment briefly on some of the other |
|
bills in today's agenda. |
|
I want to thank my friends, Mr. Connolly and Mr. Chabot, |
|
for their leadership on the Global Health Security Act, which |
|
I'm proud to co-sponsor, with respect to our fight against |
|
COVID-19. |
|
We are not out of the woods yet. We cannot claim victory |
|
over this global pandemic until we stop its spread everywhere. |
|
Not just in the United States, but everywhere. This will |
|
require years of sustained vigilant U.S. leadership, harnessing |
|
the expertise of our government agencies, and working with our |
|
partners overseas. |
|
Moreover, COVID-19 will not be the last infectious disease |
|
that threatens to become a global pandemic, and a Global Health |
|
Security Act will ensure we are prepared for years to come. |
|
Although it's unfortunate we could not pass this into law |
|
before the emergence of COVID-19, it isn't too late for this |
|
legislation to make an important difference for all of us and |
|
for the world. |
|
I'd also like to thank Mr. Connolly and Mr. Malinowski for |
|
their work on the two bills pertaining to Saudi Arabia and the |
|
murder of Jamal Khashoggi, which I--bills which I support. |
|
Just last week, I chaired a hearing on human rights in |
|
Saudi Arabia, where our witnesses described how the kingdom |
|
continues to brutally repress speech and dissent. As I said |
|
then, we cannot be afraid to speak truth to our partners, |
|
important partners, and we can never sacrifice American values. |
|
Saudi leadership must address American concerns about the |
|
treatment of our citizens and residents, and stop its targeting |
|
of Saudi dissidents and political activists. |
|
Two and a half years after the murder of Jamal Khashoggi |
|
and after the release of the intelligence report, Congress |
|
should reinforce the message that the United States will not |
|
tolerate gross human rights abuses, including the targeting of |
|
dissidents abroad. |
|
I believe this is part of the challenging but necessary |
|
recalibration of U.S.-Saudi relations that the Biden |
|
administration has spoken of. So I'm hopeful that we once again |
|
have a partner in the executive branch as we pursue this goal. |
|
Finally, I want to address H.R. 256, which repeals the 2002 |
|
AUMF. Frankly, it is long past time for Congress to take up |
|
meaningful debate and action on war powers authorities and this |
|
bill is an important first step. |
|
Congress, America, and the world have changed significantly |
|
since 2002, and as we heard repeatedly at Tuesday's hearing, |
|
the 2002 AUMF is now completely unnecessary for addressing any |
|
of the security challenges that we face today. |
|
Some of our colleagues have argued that while they might |
|
agree in principle, they take issue with the process of |
|
repealing the 2002 AUMF without also taking up the replacement |
|
of the 2001 AUMF. |
|
I absolutely agree that we should work urgently along with |
|
the Biden administration to reconsider and modernize the 2001 |
|
AUMF. |
|
But there is no reason that that needs to happen |
|
simultaneously with repealing the 2002 AUMF. We need to get it |
|
right. We can take these steps in succession and I very much, |
|
very much hope that we will. |
|
And so I'll just close by thanking and commending the |
|
chairman and the ranking member again. Thanks for elevating |
|
these important issues. Thanks for ensuring this committee |
|
plays an active role in discussions and actions over war |
|
powers. |
|
And I yield back. |
|
Chairman Meeks. The gentleman yields back. |
|
I now recognize Representative Ann Wagner of Missouri, who |
|
is the vice ranking member of the full committee, for 5 |
|
minutes. |
|
Mrs. Wagner. I thank you, Chairman Meeks, and I'd also like |
|
to thank Ranking Member McCaul for including my bill, H.R. |
|
1083, the Southeast Asia Strategy Act, in today's en banc |
|
markup. |
|
I'd also like to thank Congressman Castro, with whom I |
|
founded the ASEAN Caucus, for working with me on this |
|
legislation and for his great support of U.S.-ASEAN relations. |
|
Member States of the Association of Southeast Asian |
|
Nations, or ASEAN, are vital to the prosperity of the U.S. |
|
economy, generating hundreds of thousands of American jobs. |
|
H.R. 1083, the Southeast Asia Strategy Act, will deepen |
|
U.S. engagement in the region by requiring the United States to |
|
develop a coherent regional strategy that addresses all aspects |
|
of the relationship from trade and humanitarian goals to |
|
diplomatic and security arrangements. |
|
U.S.-Southeast Asia relations are at a critical, critical |
|
juncture. People's Republic of China is working aggressively to |
|
expand its influence in this strategically important region, |
|
using predatory investment, threatening new military |
|
installments, and outright bullying to achieve its goals. |
|
But Southeast Asian countries do not believe that China and |
|
its--China's interests are well intentioned. Our partners seek |
|
assurances that the United States will continue to demonstrate |
|
strength in the region, and we must support our partners and |
|
allies as they stand up to China's erratic and aggressive |
|
behavior. |
|
The U.S. should be proactively crafting and implementing |
|
its Southeast Asia strategy, and this bill would require the |
|
administration to do just that. |
|
My legislation will ensure that the United States seizes |
|
its opportunity to engage meaningfully and productively with |
|
this dynamic and growing region. |
|
It will position the U.S. and its partners to safeguard |
|
freedom of navigation, promote mutually beneficial economic |
|
development, and strengthen the democratic norms that China |
|
seeks to undermine. |
|
Mr. Chairman, I want to thank you again for your great work |
|
on the U.S.-Southeast Asian relations, and I urge my colleagues |
|
to support H.R. 1083, the Southeast Asia Strategy Act. |
|
And I yield back. |
|
Chairman Meeks. The gentlelady yields back. |
|
I now recognize Representative Karen Bass of California, |
|
who is the chair of the Subcommittee on Africa, Global Health, |
|
and Global Human Rights, for 5 minutes. |
|
Ms. Bass. Well, thank you, Mr. Chairman, and let me thank |
|
the ranking member for this markup today. I also want to thank |
|
the ranking member of the Subcommittee on Africa as I join him |
|
in co-sponsoring H.R. 1079, the Desert Locust Control Act. I |
|
want to thank Ranking Member Smith. |
|
COVID-19 has forced us to acknowledge that the world's |
|
fates are intertwined and that the world cannot be safe from |
|
this pandemic until everyone is. |
|
That is why I introduced H. Res. 245, calling for continued |
|
and robust international collaboration and coordination to |
|
fight COVID-19 across Africa. |
|
I'm pleased that this resolution is bipartisan and hope |
|
that we can move forward together to continue to work in a |
|
bipartisan manner to fight COVID-19. |
|
Again, I want to thank the Ranking Member McCaul and the |
|
Africa Subcommittee Member Smith for supporting the resolution |
|
and showing that Congress can work together for the good of the |
|
American people and those around the world. |
|
This resolution reaffirms that decreasing the spread of |
|
COVID-19 and preventing future COVID-19 variants globally and |
|
in Africa is in the national interest of the United States. |
|
It also calls for continued and robust international |
|
collaboration and coordination to fight COVID-19 across Africa. |
|
Resources are increasingly limited in the United States and |
|
abroad. World economies are impacted due to the pandemic. |
|
I recently had a hearing on the effect of COVID-19 in |
|
Africa, and one of the witnesses was the director of the Africa |
|
CDC. He stated how he was worried about a vaccine war on the |
|
continent because of shipment delays. This will significantly |
|
impact the ability to fight the virus on the continent and |
|
weaken solid economies and destroy weaker ones. |
|
Botswana, for example, a pillar of democracy on the |
|
candidate--on the continent has had to shift its focus from |
|
development to defense. Its citizens are worried that the |
|
pandemic will destroy its tourism economy and the government is |
|
worried about maintaining its borders from outside countries |
|
with more severe COVID-19 cases. |
|
This week, I spoke with the Ambassador from Botswana about |
|
the effects COVID-19 has had on his country, and he reiterated |
|
that several African countries allocated money for COVAX and |
|
Botswana paid for 20 percent of its population to be |
|
vaccinated. |
|
But at this point, it doesn't look like this mark will be |
|
reached due to the supply. In another conversation I had with |
|
the U.S.--the Ambassador from India to the U.S. about his |
|
country recently made a grant in aid delivery of 30,000 COVID- |
|
19 vaccines to Botswana on March 9th. The country has also made |
|
vaccines available to 30 other countries in Africa. |
|
Although there are reports that the Serum Institute of |
|
India is suspending major exports of the AstraZeneca COVID-19 |
|
vaccine to the continent, they have shown a good faith and |
|
humanity. |
|
It is time the United States do the same and I'm asking my |
|
colleagues on both sides of the aisle to help ramp up our |
|
efforts to the continent. This is why we must also leverage |
|
resources and utilize multilateral tools available in an |
|
equitable and efficient manner. |
|
And this is why the United States must remain actively |
|
engaged and lead a sustained and robust COVID-19 recovery |
|
effort. |
|
In Africa, that means working with the African Union and |
|
the Africa CDC to collaboratively tackle the continent's health |
|
system challenges by equipping them to deliver science-based |
|
and quality health care. |
|
This resolution calls for the U.S. and international |
|
partners to work collaboratively to address the impacts of |
|
COVID-19 in Africa, the other impacts, including food |
|
insecurity, education challenges posed by the pandemic, global |
|
supply chain disruptions, equitable access to secure internet |
|
and digital connectivity, and good governance. |
|
We must seize this renewed sense of urgency to help build a |
|
true partnership with Africa by looking beyond a short-term |
|
recovery to mitigate the growing number of complex |
|
interconnected risks. |
|
I hope you will join me and my colleagues across the aisle |
|
and vote to support this resolution. Reaffirming decreasing the |
|
spread of COVID-19 and preventing future variants is in the |
|
national interests of the United States. |
|
Thank you, Mr. Chairman. I yield back. |
|
Chairman Meeks. The gentlelady yields back. |
|
I now recognize Representative Young Kim of California, |
|
who's the vice ranking member of the Subcommittee on Asia, the |
|
Pacific, Central Asia, and Nonproliferation, for 5 minutes. |
|
Ms. Kim of California. Thank you, Chairman Meeks and |
|
Ranking Member McCaul. I am honored to speak in support of the |
|
bills included in this en bloc package before us today. |
|
That includes my bill on directing the State Department to |
|
implement a strategy to help Taiwan regain its observer status |
|
at the World Health Organization and its decisionmaking body, |
|
the World Health Assembly. |
|
In 2017, Taiwan was unjustly kicked out of the WHO by its |
|
leadership, under pressure by the Chinese Communist Party, |
|
which prevented it from sharing and receiving vital information |
|
before and during the COVID-19 pandemic. |
|
Taiwan has long been a leader in global health security, |
|
collaborating with countries around the world in combating |
|
deadly disease outbreaks. |
|
Since 1996, Taiwan has invested more than $6 billion in |
|
international medical and humanitarian aid efforts in more than |
|
80 countries. During the 2014 Ebola crisis, Taiwan donated over |
|
a million dollars and provided 100,000 sets of personal |
|
protective equipment. |
|
Additionally, Taiwan was one of the first countries to |
|
raise the alarm during the initial spread of COVID-19 using its |
|
public health expertise to respond to the pandemic very |
|
effectively within its borders while donating tens of millions |
|
of masks and PPE equipment to other nations in need. |
|
Taiwan's actions have proven that not only do they deserve |
|
a seat at the table, but having Taiwan as an observer at the |
|
WHO also brings tangible healthy security benefits to the |
|
United States and the rest of the world. |
|
I want to thank Chairman Meeks, Ranking Member McCaul, Asia |
|
Subcommittee Chairman Bera, and Ranking Member Chabot, all of |
|
whom are original co-sponsors of the bill for including this |
|
initiative in today's markup and passing the first Taiwan- |
|
related initiative of the 117th Congress out of this committee. |
|
And I also want to thank my good friend, Congressman Brad |
|
Sherman, for co-leading this bill and ensuring that it received |
|
broad bipartisan support. Taiwan is a bipartisan issue, and I'm |
|
very encouraged by our committee's action today. |
|
Thank you, and I yield the balance of my time. |
|
Chairman Meeks. The gentlelady yields back. |
|
I now recognize Representative Ted Lieu of California for 5 |
|
minutes. |
|
Mr. Lieu. Thank you, Chairman Meeks, for holding this |
|
markup, and I want to, first of all, talk about the legislation |
|
related to Taiwan in directing the Secretary of State to have a |
|
strategy for putting Taiwan back into observer status at the |
|
World Health Organization. |
|
I note that, unlike the Chinese government, which lied |
|
about the coronavirus at the beginning of the pandemic, Taiwan |
|
did everything right. They told the truth about the virus, |
|
which is that it could be transmitted by humans, and Taiwan |
|
relied on the science. |
|
They used mask protocols. They engaged in social |
|
distancing. They put in effective virus suppression measures. |
|
And because of what they did, Taiwan reopened their economy |
|
much sooner than the United States. |
|
The United States and the world has a lot to learn from |
|
Taiwan, and I fully support that legislation. |
|
I also rise in support of the two bills regarding Saudi |
|
Arabia. I just want to remind everyone that the Kingdom of |
|
Saudi Arabia lied to United States for 17 straight days. They |
|
lied to us, they lied to the world, about the murder of a U.S. |
|
legal permanent resident who was also an opinions columnist for |
|
the Washington Post. |
|
And what we know is that Saudi Arabia has not suffered a |
|
lot of consequences that other normal countries would have |
|
suffered for lying about murdering a legal U.S. resident. So I |
|
support both of those two bills related to Saudi Arabia. |
|
And then finally, I want to talk briefly about the AUMF. We |
|
shouldn't have forever wars, which means we shouldn't have |
|
AUMFs without sunsets that allow for these forever wars, and |
|
it's time that we repeal the 2002 AUMF and I want to commend |
|
Representative Barbara Lee and all the others who have worked |
|
on this issue. |
|
And thank you again, Chairman, for holding this important |
|
markup, and I yield back. |
|
Chairman Meeks. The gentleman yields back. |
|
I now recognize Representative Abigail Spanberger of |
|
Virginia, who is the vice chair of the Subcommittee on Europe, |
|
Energy, and the Environment and Cyber, for 5 minutes. |
|
Ms. Spanberger. Thank you very much, Chairman Meeks, and |
|
thank you to Ranking Member McCaul for your legislation, the |
|
Promoting U.S. International Leadership in 5G Act. It is |
|
difficult to overState the long-term effects of the global |
|
transition to 5G and it's also important that we take seriously |
|
the risks involved in this transition, especially those posed |
|
by the Chinese government and Chinese government-backed |
|
companies. |
|
According to a 2018 NATO report, Huawei's growing influence |
|
as a leading supplier of 5G technology could be exploited by |
|
China to engage in espionage, monitor foreign corporations and |
|
governments, and support Chinese military operations. |
|
As China works hard to take advantage of this moment, the |
|
United States must redouble our efforts to support U.S. |
|
competitiveness and innovation in the telecom space and protect |
|
against threats to Americans and U.S. interests that are posed |
|
by foreign-backed 5G technologies and networks, and work with |
|
our allies and partners to pursue similar strategies to do |
|
this. |
|
My bipartisan legislation that required a national strategy |
|
on 5G, one that would protect U.S. consumers and assist U.S. |
|
allies in maximizing the security of their 5G telecommunication |
|
systems, was signed into law by President Trump, and I |
|
appreciated Ranking Member McCaul's support for my legislation. |
|
And today, I am happy to support your legislation, Mr. |
|
Ranking Member McCaul. It is critical that the United States |
|
develop strategies to better engage in international standard- |
|
setting bodies to ensure that U.S. interests are integrated as |
|
the international community deliberates on the standards that |
|
will shape the future of the international telecom industry. |
|
By engaging diplomatically in these multilateral forums, |
|
the United States can enhance U.S. competitiveness and national |
|
security. |
|
Thank you for your leadership on this, Ranking Member |
|
McCaul, and I look forward to continuing to work with you to |
|
ensure that the United States is leading the 5G transition and |
|
that we do our part to protect American security and economic |
|
considerations. |
|
I yield back. |
|
Chairman Meeks. The gentlelady yields back. |
|
I now recognize Representative Chrissy Houlahan of |
|
Pennsylvania for 5 minutes. |
|
Ms. Houlahan. Thank you, Mr. Chair, and thank you to |
|
everyone on the committee for your support of my critical piece |
|
of legislation, H.R. 1500, the Global Learning Loss Assessment |
|
Act. And I'd also like to thank my colleagues, Representatives |
|
Fitzpatrick, also from our home Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, |
|
and Representative Quigley, for their work on this bill. |
|
Together, through this legislation, we are requiring the U.S. |
|
Agency for International Development, or USAID, to submit a |
|
report to Congress on the impacts of COVID-19 on USAID-based |
|
education programs and global learning. |
|
Over the past year, COVID has disrupted the education of |
|
over 90 percent of the world's children. The Research Triangle |
|
Institute predicts that most students will return to school |
|
looking more like students in the middle or close to the end of |
|
their previous grade, and this disruption has compounded the |
|
global learning crisis that preceded the pandemic. Already, |
|
students were behind on literacy comprehension and much more, |
|
which makes the next few months incredibly important. |
|
My colleagues and I on this bill are clear-minded about |
|
what needs to happen. To shore up the increasing gaps in |
|
learning and preserve the massive gains that the United States |
|
has made in global education rates, we need to understand the |
|
extent of the damage that this pandemic has caused. This bill |
|
will arm us with data that we need to move quickly, to invest |
|
effectively across our USAID programs, and to make our |
|
international basic education programs more resilient to crises |
|
like these. |
|
We cannot afford to ignore the devastating effects of |
|
COVID-19 on students around the world. Education loss will |
|
continue without intentional steps on our behalf, and inaction |
|
will most certainly lead to further loss. |
|
We must also recognize the disproportionate impact that |
|
this pandemic has had on vulnerable populations, particularly |
|
young girls. Education is key to the success and well-being of |
|
women and girls. It often provides economic opportunity that |
|
would otherwise not have been available. |
|
And I am particularly concerned about the harrowing |
|
consequences that school-age girls are facing in the light of |
|
their school closures, including an increased likelihood of |
|
gender-based violence and unplanned pregnancies. Since the |
|
outbreak of COVID-19, emerging data and reports from those on |
|
the front lines have shown that all types of violence against |
|
women and girls has intensified during this time. |
|
The United States has been an historic leader on global |
|
education, investing in USAID and partner programs to pave the |
|
way for a more educated global society. And I believe our |
|
leadership here is even more important and should continue. Our |
|
work in this space helps us to build mutually beneficial |
|
relationships with countries around the world, and investments |
|
in education extend far, far beyond the classroom. |
|
Educating children helps lead to more prosperous and |
|
economically stable societies that are less likely to be |
|
gripped by conflict and extremism. We have the opportunity to |
|
empower young people across the globe, and I believe our Global |
|
Learning Loss Assessment Act is a necessary step in seizing on |
|
that opportunity. |
|
With that, thank you, and I yield back, Mr. Chair. |
|
Chairman Meeks. The gentlelady yields back her time. |
|
Does anyone else wish to speak on the en bloc? |
|
Hearing no further request for recognition, the committee |
|
will proceed to consider the notice of items en bloc. |
|
Pursuant to the previous order, the question occurs on the |
|
measures of en bloc, as amended, if amended. |
|
We're going to take a vote by voice. All members, please |
|
unmute your microphone. |
|
All those in favor, say aye. |
|
Those opposed, say no. |
|
In the opinion of the chair, the ayes have it, and the |
|
motion to reconsider is laid on the table. |
|
The measures considered en bloc are agreed to, and the |
|
motion to reconsider is laid on the table. And pursuant to the |
|
previous order of the committee, each measure is offered |
|
favorably reported, as amended, if amended. And each amendment |
|
or amendment to each bill shall be reported as a single |
|
amendment in the nature of a substitute. |
|
Without objection, staff is authorized to make any |
|
technical and conforming changes. |
|
Now it's time to move on to the next item of business. We |
|
will be considering separately the following measures and their |
|
amendments: H.R. 391, the Global Health Security Act of 2021; |
|
H.R. 2118, Securing America from Epidemics Act; H.R. 1464, the |
|
Khashoggi Accountability Act, and H.R. 256, to repeal the |
|
Authorization for Use of Military Force Against Iraq Resolution |
|
of 2002. |
|
Now we will move on to consider H.R. 391, the Global Health |
|
Security Act of 2021. |
|
Pursuant to notice, for purposes of markup, I now call up |
|
H.R. 391. The clerk will report the bill. |
|
Ms. Stiles. H.R. 391, a bill to authorize a comprehensive |
|
strategic approach for United States foreign assistance to |
|
developing countries to strengthen global health security, and |
|
for other purposes. |
|
Chairman Meeks. Without objection, the first reading of the |
|
bill is dispensed with. |
|
Without objection, the bill shall be considered as read and |
|
open to amendment at any point. |
|
[The bill H.R. 391 follows:] |
|
|
|
[GRAPHIC(S) NOT AVAILABLE IN TIFF FORMAT] |
|
|
|
|
|
Chairman Meeks. Two bipartisan amendments to this bill were |
|
distributed to members in advance, and I understand members are |
|
prepared to accept them. |
|
So, without objection, the two bipartisan amendments, |
|
Connolly Amendment No. 40 and McCaul Amendment No. 20, are |
|
supported by myself and Mr. McCaul and Mr. Connolly, and are |
|
agreed to en bloc. |
|
[The amendments en bloc follow:] |
|
|
|
[GRAPHIC(S) NOT AVAILABLE IN TIFF FORMAT] |
|
|
|
|
|
Chairman Meeks. At this time, I recognize myself to speak |
|
on the measure. |
|
The past year has taught all of us the importance of global |
|
health security. Never has it been so clear that the pathogens |
|
around the world can dramatically affect American life here at |
|
home. |
|
Representative Connolly has been a persistent leader on |
|
this issue in the past, and I so appreciate his work this |
|
Congress to further update this legislation. |
|
As the saying goes, one ounce of prevention is worth a |
|
pound of cure. And that is undoubtedly true in global health. |
|
Pandemics do not respect borders. They do not care about |
|
nationalities, and we have spent the last year seeing that play |
|
out with horrific results in the COVID-19 pandemic. |
|
Having a coordinated, whole-of-government approach to both |
|
preparing for and responding to these threats is critical, even |
|
more so, as we face a growing coronavirus outbreak. |
|
This measure today would institutionalize the best |
|
practices the United States has learned in global health |
|
security. The bill establishes an Interagency Review Council to |
|
advance global health security and mandates a U.S. Global |
|
Health Security Coordinator to manage the U.S. response in |
|
these emergencies and to speak with one voice. |
|
It also requires a strategy and reporting to Congress, |
|
which has communicated throughout this latest coronavirus |
|
outbreak its conviction that global health security is in our |
|
national interest, not just in playing catchup, but in getting |
|
ahead of the curve. |
|
I support this important legislation and encourage everyone |
|
to do the same. |
|
I realize that members wish to speak on the bill, and that |
|
some members have amendments to offer. Please use the ``raise |
|
your hand'' function on Webex, and I will recognize members by |
|
committee seniority, alternating between Democrats and |
|
Republicans, for the purpose of speaking on the bill first. If |
|
you miss your turn, please let our staff know. We will circle |
|
back to you. Then, we will move on to amendments. |
|
I now recognize Representative Steve Chabot of Ohio, who is |
|
the ranking member of the Subcommittee on Asia, the Pacific, |
|
Central Asia, and Nonproliferation, for 5 minutes. |
|
Mr. Chabot. Thank you, Mr. Chairman. Thanks for yielding. |
|
I'm not going to take the full 5 minutes because I spoke on |
|
this at the beginning. |
|
But I want to again commend Mr. Connolly for his leadership |
|
on this. We've been working on this now for 3 years. And as I |
|
mentioned before, this really was prescient because we had |
|
never heard of COVID-19 when we put this legislation together |
|
and introduced it. We were concerned that we were vulnerable, |
|
and the rest of the world was vulnerable, to something like |
|
this. And so, we thought that we ought to be prepared for it |
|
here, and that, most importantly, we ought to be working with |
|
other countries across the globe who may not be as prepared as |
|
we are. And it turned out that Mr. Connolly and I were right, |
|
and obviously, this has been devastating to so many people. The |
|
worse, of course, is losing over half a million lives, but it |
|
has devastated small business; it's devastated families, and |
|
you name it. So, it's been a terrible pandemic, and this will |
|
prepare us for the next one. |
|
And so, I just want to, again, commend him and all the |
|
other members who have worked with us to get this to this |
|
point. I am hoping that we can actually pass this into |
|
legislation if we can get the Senate to act on it. So, I want |
|
to thank all the members for working on this with us. |
|
And I yield back. |
|
Chairman Meeks. The gentleman yields back. |
|
I now recognize Representative Gerry Connolly of Virginia, |
|
the President of the NATO Parliamentary Assembly, for 5 |
|
minutes. |
|
Mr. Connolly. Thank you, Mr. Chairman, and thank you, Mr. |
|
McCaul. And thank you to my good friend and partner in this |
|
enterprise, Mr. Chabot of Ohio. |
|
This is an important bill. Tragically, we did not know how |
|
prescient or desperately needed this was when we first |
|
introduced it in December 2018. The global COVID-19 pandemic |
|
underscored not only the need for a robust Federal response to |
|
such a crisis, but also the importance of investing in global |
|
health security and pandemic preparedness around the world, |
|
because diseases do not respect borders. |
|
I welcome the fact that the House Foreign Affairs Committee |
|
has coalesced around a bipartisan solution that addresses |
|
deficiencies in the current pandemic response effort, as well |
|
as demonstrating a commitment to a comprehensive and |
|
sustainable approach to global health security going forward. |
|
We must rise to this occasion. We are in a pandemic that |
|
has cost over a million lives worldwide, but 600,000 lives here |
|
in our home country and tens of millions of Americans have |
|
suffered from COVID infection, many still with lingering, |
|
prolonged symptoms. |
|
This bill would establish a Global Health Security Agenda |
|
Interagency Review Council, overseen by the National Security |
|
Advisor, and whose membership would include the heads of |
|
agencies relevant to carrying out the Global Health Security |
|
Agenda. It would establish a U.S. Coordinator for Global Health |
|
Security responsible for coordinating the interagency response |
|
to a global health security emergency. It would require the |
|
President to develop a Global Health Security Strategy with |
|
specific and measurable goals, benchmarks, and performance |
|
metrics that will improve U.S. leadership in global pandemic |
|
preparedness, and it would establish, finally, an International |
|
Fund for Global Health Security and Pandemic Preparedness. |
|
I want to again thank you, Chairman Meeks and Ranking |
|
Member McCaul, for working with Mr. Chabot and me to strengthen |
|
this legislation. I also want to thank our respective committee |
|
staffs and our personal staffs for their commitment to this |
|
enterprise. |
|
I really believe the result of our collaboration is a |
|
better bill that will have an even greater impact on our |
|
ability to emerge from this pandemic with a plan, with |
|
infrastructure and resources in place to prevent another |
|
catastrophic global health crisis. |
|
Improvements to the bill include elevating the participants |
|
of the Interagency Council in a manner commensurate with the |
|
scope of the work that Council will need to carry out in the |
|
aftermath of the pandemic; strengthening the scope of the |
|
Global Health Security Strategy with lessons learned from |
|
COVID-19, and the addition of a multilateral fund. These |
|
improvements happen to consistent with the Biden |
|
administration's now Security Memorandum on the Global United |
|
States Leadership to Strengthen the International COVID-19 |
|
Response and to advance global health security and biological |
|
preparedness. |
|
Our statutory framework is careful not to be overly |
|
prescriptive and to prejudge the outcome of the current |
|
Response Framework offered by the administration. To that end, |
|
I want to thank Ranking Member McCaul for his willingness to be |
|
flexible on our vision for the U.S. Coordinator's role. Our |
|
approach does not mandate how or where the position should |
|
reside ultimately, and we think that approach gives us an |
|
opportunity to continue to have a dialog on this point and |
|
pursue a coordinated model that's informed by the best |
|
practices and lessons learned from this pandemic. |
|
Republican and Democratic Presidents alike have recognized |
|
the critical importance of global health security, President |
|
Obama's role on launching the Global Health Security Agenda to |
|
President Trump's National Security Strategy and the National |
|
Biodefense Strategy. |
|
Whether it's the current COVID-19 pandemic or the next |
|
crisis, it's clear these threats are ongoing and increasing, |
|
saving lives when the next global pandemic starts with |
|
investing and preparedness before is strikes. And we have seen |
|
time and again diseases do not respect borders and global |
|
health crises have immense security, economic, and humanitarian |
|
consequences. |
|
Our Global Health Security Act recognizes the critical role |
|
of U.S. leadership in international health security, enshrines |
|
U.S. global health security policy in statute, and ensures that |
|
there is a permanent designated official responsible for |
|
coordinating these efforts and accountable for response |
|
outcomes. |
|
I am proud that our Global Health Security Act has passed |
|
the House four times, and I think we are even better positioned |
|
now to pursue this effort and get it into law. |
|
In closing, I want to thank all of my colleagues--Steve |
|
Chabot, Rick Larsen, Brian Fitzpatrick, Ami Bera, Ann Wagner-- |
|
for serving as original co-sponsors of this bipartisan bill. |
|
And again, I cannot thank the chairman and ranking member |
|
enough for their involvement and their active support. |
|
I yield back. |
|
Chairman Meeks. The gentleman's time has expired. |
|
Seeing no further requests to speak, let's move on to |
|
amendments. |
|
For what purpose does the Representative from Ohio, Mr. |
|
Chabot, seek recognition? |
|
Mr. Chabot. Thank you, Mr. Chairman. I have an amendment at |
|
the desk. |
|
Chairman Meeks. The clerk shall distribute the amendment to |
|
your staff virtually. |
|
Mr. Chabot. Thank you. |
|
Chairman Meeks. I'm pausing briefly to give all members |
|
enough time to review the amendment. |
|
Has everyone received a copy of the amendment? |
|
The clerk will please report the amendment. |
|
Ms. Stiles. Chabot Amendment No. 12. Strike Section 7 and |
|
insert the following: Section 7, Strategy and Reports. |
|
Chairman Meeks. Without objection, further reading of the |
|
amendment will be dispensed with. |
|
[The Amendment No. 12 of Mr. Chabot follows:] |
|
|
|
|
|
[GRAPHIC(S) NOT AVAILABLE IN TIFF FORMAT] |
|
|
|
Chairman Meeks. The Representative from Ohio, Mr. Chabot, |
|
is recognized for 5 minutes in support of Amendment No. 12. |
|
Mr. Chabot. Thank you, Mr. Chairman. I will not need to |
|
take that much time. |
|
Throughout my time in Congress, I've always sought to |
|
ensure that taxpayer money is spent effectively. One way to do |
|
it is to include strategy and reporting requirements in |
|
legislation we pass to enhance our ability to do effective |
|
oversight. |
|
If adopted, this amendment would strengthen both the |
|
strategy and the reports required by the Global Health Security |
|
Act to enhance better oversight over U.S. efforts to advance |
|
pandemic preparedness and response capabilities around the |
|
globe. |
|
This amendment is a consensus product of bipartisan |
|
negotiations between myself, Mr. Connolly, Ranking Member |
|
McCaul, and Chairman Meeks. And I would urge that my colleagues |
|
support the amendment, and I yield back. |
|
Mr. Connolly. Would my friend, Mr. Chabot, yield to me, Mr. |
|
Connolly? |
|
Mr. Chabot. I would be happy to yield to the gentleman from |
|
the Commonwealth of Virginia, Mr. Connolly. |
|
Mr. Connolly. I thank you, Mr. Chabot. |
|
I just want to briefly say I support the amendment, and I |
|
think it's a very thoughtful and substantive addition that |
|
strengthens the bill and strengthens our effort going forward. |
|
And I urge its adoption. |
|
Thank you for yielding. |
|
Mr. Chabot. I'm happy to yield, and I yield back. |
|
Chairman Meeks. The gentleman yields back. |
|
I now recognize myself for 5 minutes. |
|
I support Mr. Chabot's amendment. Mr. Chabot's amendment, |
|
along with the McCaul and Connolly amendments to the GHSA, |
|
represent a bipartisan group of changes to the bill which I, |
|
the ranking member, Mr. Connolly, and Mr. Chabot support. |
|
Mr. Chabot's amendment includes greater detail in the |
|
Global Health Security Strategy required by the bill, adding |
|
pieces like commitments to transparency, avoiding overlap and |
|
duplication, and supporting public-private partnerships. The |
|
strategy also calls for working closely with allies and |
|
partners, a crucial component to maintain global health |
|
security. |
|
I encourage all of my colleagues to support this important |
|
amendment, and I yield back. |
|
Is there any further debate on Chabot Amendment No. 12? |
|
[No response.] |
|
Chairman Meeks. I understand that there are a couple of |
|
amendments to the Chabot amendment. |
|
For what purpose does the Representative from Pennsylvania, |
|
Mr. Perry, seek recognition? |
|
Mr. Perry. Thank you, Mr. Chairman. I have what I think is |
|
a friendly amendment at the desk. |
|
Chairman Meeks. The clerk shall distribute the amendment to |
|
your staff virtually. |
|
Let's pause briefly to give members enough time to review |
|
the amendment. |
|
Has everyone received a copy of the amendment? |
|
The clerk will please report the amendment. |
|
Ms. Stiles. Perry Amendment No. 51. At the end of Section |
|
7(b), add the following---- |
|
Chairman Meeks. Without objection, further reading of the |
|
amendment will be dispensed with. |
|
[The Amendment No. 51 of Mr. Perry follows:] |
|
|
|
[GRAPHIC(S) NOT AVAILABLE IN TIFF FORMAT] |
|
|
|
Chairman Meeks. A point of order is reserved. |
|
The Representative from Pennsylvania, Mr. Perry, is |
|
recognized for 5 minutes in support of the amendment. |
|
Mr. Perry. Well, thank you, Mr. Chairman. |
|
This is the first of three I have on this piece of |
|
legislation. |
|
I certainly thank the gentlemen and ladies on both sides of |
|
the aisle that have worked diligently for years to bring this |
|
to fruition. I just want to bring it up-to-date, especially |
|
based on what has happened in the last year and some-odd |
|
months. |
|
A discussion on this legislation cannot go without |
|
mentioning the lack of global health security as a result of |
|
the action of the Chinese Communist Party. Now this amendment |
|
does not for anything except accountability. We simply must |
|
acknowledge that the main reason we're discussing global health |
|
security today is because of China. |
|
Understandably, there have been epidemics and/or pandemics |
|
in the past, including the outbreak of H1N1 in this country and |
|
the outbreak of Ebola in Africa. However, the fact that the CCP |
|
controls or has outsized influence in so many international |
|
institutions is a very real threat to the success of any |
|
interagency or multilateral effort to combat the spread of |
|
diseases around the world. |
|
Now this amendment would address serious concerns that have |
|
been raised in numerous outlets regarding gain-of-function |
|
research being conducted at the Wuhan Institute of Virology. To |
|
be clear, gain-of-function research is the deliberate |
|
manipulation of a virus to make it more transmissible and |
|
fatal. |
|
In a letter I led to the HHS OIG last month, I noted that |
|
the Wuhan Institute was somehow eligible for NIH grant funding. |
|
This is entirely unacceptable. And a few hours after my |
|
colleagues and I delivered that letter to the OIG's office, the |
|
Biden administration pledged to not provide funds to the Wuhan |
|
Institute, thank goodness, because I was pretty sure they were |
|
prepared to continue to fund the Institute again. |
|
This is a good start, but we need to continue to hold China |
|
accountable. We know that the NIH has previously provided funds |
|
to the Wuhan Institute, and we know that the NIH grantees, |
|
including the EcoHealth Alliance, have provided funds to the |
|
Wuhan Institute as well. |
|
Aside from preventing funds from going to the WIV, or any |
|
institution in the People's Republic of China engaging in gain- |
|
of-function research, we need to assess the extent and scope of |
|
such research in preparing for future virus outbreaks. And we |
|
need to be fully in the know, which leads to my last point. |
|
China has been far from a helpful partner during this |
|
pandemic. We know for a fact that they lied to us and made the |
|
virus far more impactful than it had to be. |
|
The second part of this amendment includes a strategy for |
|
ensuring maximum readiness against future pandemics, in light |
|
of the PRC's historic refusal to cooperate on issues of global |
|
health security. Put plainly, they're not going to want to |
|
cooperate with us. So, we need to begin to assess how we might |
|
otherwise avoid putting ourselves in a position that doesn't |
|
again leave millions of Americans out of jobs and hundreds of |
|
thousands of American families without a loved one today. |
|
This amendment is less about how we can work with China-- |
|
they have shown time and time again they have very little |
|
interest in working with us on issues of global health |
|
security--but it is more about how we can best monitor China's |
|
roguish behavior. |
|
With that, I urge adoption of this amendment, and I yield |
|
back the remainder of the time, Mr. Chair. |
|
Chairman Meeks. The gentleman yields back. But I want the |
|
gentleman to know that we called up the Perry Amendment No. 51. |
|
I think that you were articulating about the Perry Amendment |
|
No. 48, if that's not correct. We called up 51, the proposed |
|
amendment which requires the President, in collaboration with |
|
ODNI, to make a determination on the likelihood that COVID |
|
originated in a Chinese lab. That's No. 51. |
|
Mr. Perry. Mr. Chairman, I apologize for being out of order |
|
here. Somehow, they had it up that way on my sheet, and I do |
|
not have them listed in the numbers that you have them listed |
|
in. |
|
Chairman Meeks. So, let me just let the record reflect that |
|
now I'll call up, since you debated Perry No. 48---- |
|
Mr. Perry. Okay. |
|
Chairman Meeks [continuing]. I will respond to No. 48, and |
|
we will recall 51 after we debate 48. |
|
So, I have to make sure now that everyone has received a |
|
copy of the Amendment No. 48 for their review. |
|
Okay. Has everybody received 48? |
|
Seeing that everyone has Perry Amendment No. 48, I now |
|
recognize myself for 5--oh, no, let me let the clerk read 48. |
|
Ms. Stiles. Perry Amendment No. 48. At the end of Section |
|
7(c), add the following: Determination. The report required |
|
under paragraph (1) shall include: (A) A determination of the |
|
President, acting through the United States Coordinator for |
|
Global Health Security, which may be submitted---- |
|
Chairman Meeks. Without objection, further reading of the |
|
amendment will be dispensed with. |
|
[The Amendment No. 48 of Mr. Perry follows:] |
|
|
|
[GRAPHIC(S) NOT AVAILABLE IN TIFF FORMAT] |
|
|
|
Chairman Meeks. And now, since I had yielded such time to |
|
Mr. Perry, I will recognize myself for 5 minutes. |
|
Gain-of-function research is an ongoing issue, including in |
|
the United States, and should be looked at globally, not just |
|
in a single country. The strategy required under Section 7 |
|
already seeks to prevent, detect, and respond to future |
|
outbreaks. Additionally, the current strategy in the bill |
|
includes prioritizing working with countries who have |
|
demonstrated commitment to transparency and the international |
|
health regulations, the language that was included at the |
|
request of the minority. |
|
We need to remain vigilant regarding China when it comes to |
|
public health, but the next pandemic could start anywhere in |
|
the world. An effective strategy must be holistic and global in |
|
nature, and thereby, I oppose this amendment and yield back the |
|
balance of my time. |
|
Is there any further debate on the amendment? |
|
Hearing none---- |
|
Mr. Connolly. Mr. Chairman? |
|
Chairman Meeks. Yes? |
|
Mr. Connolly. This is Mr. Connolly. |
|
Chairman Meeks. Yes, Mr. Connolly is recognized for 5 |
|
minutes. |
|
Mr. Connolly. Thank you, Mr. Chairman. And thank you for |
|
your clarification. |
|
The whole issue of gain-of-function research is a global |
|
issue, not limited to one country. And I might add, I made a |
|
counteroffer to Mr. Perry with broader language that would have |
|
incorporated I think what he is trying to get at without |
|
fingering a specific lab in a specific country. That |
|
counteroffer was rejected. |
|
Second, as you point out, we added Republican language to |
|
the bill that incorporated a goal of working with countries |
|
dedicated to transparency and international health regulations. |
|
I believe that these two amendments, if I can speak to both |
|
of them, specifically imply that the virus outbreak came from a |
|
laboratory with Wuhan in the Republic of China. That is not a |
|
proven assertion. And for this committee to go on record as |
|
doing that will fracture bipartisan support for this bill, and |
|
there's something else. |
|
We just witnessed eight people mowed down in a violent gun |
|
attack in Atlanta, Georgia. Six of those eight people were |
|
Asian-Americans. All across America, our fellow Americans, |
|
Asian-Americans, Asian-American descent, are expressing fear |
|
and anger about a pattern of harassment and hate in correlation |
|
with a pandemic for which they bear no responsibility, but all |
|
too many fellow Americans blame them. |
|
The FBI has reported an increase to 3800 hate crimes aimed |
|
at Asian-Americans during the pandemic. When key figures refer |
|
to the ``China flu'' or the ``Wuhan virus,'' they apparently do |
|
not understand that some who hear them, then, act on that and |
|
blame Asian-Americans for something they are blameless for. |
|
How can we, while this Nation is grieving of the loss of |
|
these lives in a violent act of hatred, how can we add to that |
|
agony and that pain by fingering a particular lab in a |
|
particular country that will have racial ramifications in |
|
America, and will say to the world we've learned nothing? |
|
The House Foreign Affairs Committee cannot do this, even |
|
though, privately and personally. Many people may very well |
|
feel or believe China is believe, this bill is not the place in |
|
which to encumber ourselves with enshrining this through this |
|
amendment in law. It would be a mistake, it would be |
|
retrograde, and it would be a slap in the face of grieving our |
|
Asian-Americans all over our country. |
|
I urge the committee on a bipartisan basis to reject these |
|
two amendments. They serve no purpose other than ventilation, |
|
and they will do real harm. |
|
I yield back. |
|
Chairman Meeks. The gentleman yields back. |
|
Is there any further debate on Amendment No. 48? |
|
Mr. Chabot. Mr. Chairman? |
|
Chairman Meeks. Yes, who seeks recognition? |
|
Mr. Chabot. Mr. Chabot. |
|
Chairman Meeks. Mr. Chabot, you're recognized for 5 |
|
minutes. |
|
Mr. Chabot. Yes, I hadn't necessarily intended to speak on |
|
this, but since we've had a bit of a discussion, I think I |
|
should, just to clarify where I stand and where I think some of |
|
my colleagues may stand on this. I do not know for sure. |
|
But this has been a very bipartisan process. We worked very |
|
closely with Mr. Connolly and Mr. Meeks, and others. Mr. Perry |
|
has offered amendments. I think it's perfectly legitimate to |
|
call out Beijing and the Wuhan region where this happened, and |
|
whether it actually came out of the lab, I do not think we know |
|
for sure, but it may well have. And I do not think there are |
|
any racial overtones to this whatsoever. However, obviously, |
|
members can agree or disagree on those types of things. |
|
But I personally think that Mr. Perry's amendments make a |
|
good bill better. So, I intend to support them. If they do not |
|
pass, I certainly intend to support the legislation without |
|
that particular amendment. |
|
The other amendments were worked on in a partisan manner. |
|
This part couldn't be, and that's why we are where we are. But |
|
I will support this whether this amendment passes or not. |
|
And I yield back. |
|
Chairman Meeks. The gentleman yields back. The gentleman |
|
yields back. |
|
Is there any further debate on Amendment No. 48? |
|
Mr. Mast. Representative Mast seeks recognition. |
|
Chairman Meeks. Representative Mast is recognized for 5 |
|
minutes. |
|
Mr. Mast. Thank you, Mr. Chairman. I certainly will not |
|
need 5 minutes. |
|
It's just I think our colleague, Mr. Connolly, my friend |
|
Mr. Connolly, has sparked some debate among us, and I would |
|
only offer this comment: that should every white person in the |
|
United States of America take offense and feel at risk because |
|
somebody is calling out white supremacy within our country? I |
|
do not think that we would jump to that conclusion, nor should |
|
we jump to, because we are pointing to the origins of a |
|
pandemic, that every person of an Asian descent should feel as |
|
though we're somehow pointing a finger at them when we're |
|
talking about a specific origin. It would be hyperbolic in both |
|
instances, in my opinion, to do so. |
|
And in that, I yield my time back. |
|
Mr. Green. Mr. Chairman, this is Congressman Green. I'd |
|
also like to make a quick comment about this, if I could. |
|
Chairman Meeks. Mr. Green---- |
|
Ms. Bass. And, Mr. Chairman, Mr. Chairman, this is |
|
Congressman Bass. I would like to as well. |
|
Chairman Meeks. I now recognize Congresswoman Bass for 5 |
|
minutes. |
|
Ms. Bass. Thank you, Mr. Chairman. |
|
I was just a little concerned at my colleagues' comments. I |
|
think what is actual fact is that, since the virus--since the |
|
President, since President Trump started calling it ``the China |
|
virus,'' there has been a massive increase in hate crimes |
|
directed toward Asians, over a 200 percent increase. And many |
|
times when those crimes take place, the person that is |
|
attacking the individual specifically links it to that. So, |
|
that is the concern. There is no such correlation between |
|
denouncing white supremacy and, then, white Americans being |
|
concerned. There is no relationship to that at all. And I am |
|
very concerned that, after a year of vitriol from the |
|
administration, that it is not shocking to me that we had what |
|
happened last week. |
|
So, with that, I yield back. |
|
Chairman Meeks. The gentlelady yields back. |
|
I now recognize Representative Green from Tennessee for 5 |
|
minutes. |
|
Mr. Green. Thank you, Mr. Chairman. |
|
First, I want to say that the Chinese scientists who were |
|
silenced by China because they took the same position that this |
|
amendment takes, that China has suppressed the truth about the |
|
virus, were Asian. They were Chinese. So, this isn't about any |
|
demographic. This about the leadership of a country who even |
|
suppressed and disappeared their own Chinese Asian people's |
|
scientists from telling the truth about the origins of this |
|
virus and the truth about its spread, and the truth about what |
|
was going on in the Wuhan Lab and the Wuhan region of China. |
|
So, making this somehow a racial thing, sure, it may serve some |
|
political agenda, but it has no purpose in this committee. |
|
And in regards to Atlanta, the FBI has clearly not released |
|
an intent for that murderer, just as in Colorado he is of |
|
Muslim descent, but there is no intent yet that has been stated |
|
from those shooters. So, to assume that there is some kind of |
|
racial motivation because most of the people were of a certain |
|
demographic is unfair at this point. Now it may very well prove |
|
to be true, but at this point that's unfair. So, we're |
|
conflating things that we shouldn't. |
|
This virus came from that area. Their own scientists were |
|
accusing their government of making huge mistakes, and those |
|
scientists were silenced. It has nothing to do with race or |
|
ethnicity, or anything like that. |
|
And with that, I yield. |
|
Chairman Meeks. Is there further debate on Amendment No. |
|
47--48? |
|
Ms. Wild. Mr. Meeks? |
|
Chairman Meeks. Yes? |
|
Ms. Wild. Susan Wild here. |
|
Chairman Meeks. Ms. Wild is recognized for 5 minutes. |
|
Ms. Wild. Thank you, Mr. Chair. I do not need 5 minutes. |
|
I wish to associate myself with the remarks of |
|
Representative Bass and, also, to comment upon my colleague's |
|
statement about whether all whites should be threatened by the |
|
media's and public's denouncing of white supremacy, to which my |
|
answer would be, only those whites who are themselves white |
|
supremacists. |
|
And with that, I yield back. |
|
Chairman Meeks. The gentlelady yields back. |
|
Who seeks recognition? |
|
Mr. McCaul. Mr. Chairman? |
|
Chairman Meeks. Yes, I recognize Ranking Member McCaul for |
|
5 minutes. |
|
Mr. McCaul. Well, thank you. Thank you, Mr. Chairman. |
|
I would like to see the tone of this debate really more |
|
fact-based and not go down the way it's going. I just want to |
|
offer, factually, when I chaired the China Task Force, what we |
|
were able to uncover is really evidence. We do know it came out |
|
of Wuhan. There's some uncertainty whether it came from the wet |
|
market or the laboratory. |
|
And I think Mr. Perry's amendment is proper in terms of |
|
reporting, so we know about the origins of COVID-19, so we can |
|
stop this from ever happening again. Millions of people have |
|
died. Millions of jobs have been destroyed. We're entitled, as |
|
Congress, to know the truth. |
|
The fact is that they were researching coronaviruses from |
|
bats, how they could extrapolate to humans, at the lab and to |
|
develop a vaccine. We also know from Department of State cables |
|
that were declassified that there were many safety concerns |
|
about the protocols being used at the lab. As we saw in 2004, |
|
researchers walked out contaminated with the SARS virus. It's |
|
not a huge stretch, but we just do not know what all the |
|
evidence would be with respect to it leaking from this |
|
laboratory. |
|
But I think Congress is entitled to have a full both |
|
classified and unclassified briefing on this. It's a very |
|
important issue, and I think the extent to which the Chinese |
|
Communist Party went to cover this up, it needs to be talked |
|
about here. They silenced the doctors that were on WeChat |
|
talking about a SARS-like virus. They destroyed lab samples. |
|
They would not take the Taiwanese or the WHO's own expert's in |
|
Wuhan advice that it was human to human. And instead, the |
|
Director General Tedros and the WHO did not issue that alert, |
|
the international pandemic alert, but, rather, chose to sit on |
|
it. |
|
And meanwhile, the big festival in January took place, and |
|
5 million people exited Wuhan, traveled through mainland China, |
|
and then, traveled internationally. That's precisely, Mr. |
|
Chairman, when this went from a contained, local epidemic, or |
|
not contained, but local epidemic, to a global pandemic. And |
|
those are just facts. |
|
I do not think this discussion has anything to do with |
|
someone's race or anything. I think it's just it's fact-based, |
|
and I think Congress is entitled to know the facts about what |
|
happened, what did or did not happen at that laboratory. |
|
And so, I thank you. I think I would like to return to more |
|
civility in our discussion, and I thank the chairman for the |
|
time. And I yield back. |
|
Chairman Meeks. The gentleman yields back. Is there any |
|
further debate on Amendment No. 48, Perry No. 48? |
|
Hearing no further requests to speak, the question is on |
|
Perry Amendment No. 48. |
|
We're going to take a vote by voice. All members, please |
|
unmute your microphones. |
|
All those in favor, say aye. |
|
All those opposed, say no. |
|
In the opinion of the chair, the noes have it, and the |
|
amendment is not agreed to. |
|
And without objection, the motion to reconsider is laid |
|
upon the table. |
|
For what purpose does the Representative from Pennsylvania |
|
seek recognition? |
|
Mr. Perry. Thank you, Mr. Chairman. I have an amendment at |
|
the desk. I believe it's No. 51 on this occasion. |
|
Chairman Meeks. The clerk shall distribute the amendment to |
|
our staff virtually. |
|
Let's pause briefly to give all members enough time to |
|
review the amendment. |
|
Has everyone received a copy of the amendment? |
|
The clerk will please report the amendment. |
|
Ms. Stiles. Perry Amendment No. 51. At the end of Section |
|
7(b), add the following: (3) Determination. |
|
Chairman Meeks. Without objection, further reading of the |
|
amendment will be dispensed with. |
|
[The Amendment No. 51 of Mr. Perry follows:] |
|
|
|
[GRAPHIC(S) NOT AVAILABLE IN TIFF FORMAT] |
|
|
|
Chairman Meeks. A point of order is reserved. |
|
The Representative from Pennsylvania, Mr. Perry, is now |
|
recognized for 5 minutes in support of the amendment. |
|
Mr. Perry. Thank you very much, Mr. Chairman. |
|
The greatest mystery surrounding the coronavirus pandemic |
|
will almost certainly never be solved--how it began. Whether it |
|
originated in a wet market in Wuhan or leaked from a laboratory |
|
as a result of gain-of-function research promoted by Chinese |
|
health authorities, we'll likely never know because the CCP |
|
will do absolutely everything they can to avoid cooperating on |
|
the subject and having the world find out the truth. |
|
The lab theory was dismissed early on as a right-wing |
|
conspiracy less than 1 year ago. However, just last month, The |
|
Washington Post, not exactly an outlet known for advocacy of |
|
conservative viewpoints, published an article on the lab |
|
hypothesis in an op-ed. More and more questions continue to |
|
surround this hypothesis, especially in light of circumstances |
|
immediately preceding the pandemic. |
|
For example, in 2018, the State Department offered a |
|
briefing regarding the potential pandemic risk of research |
|
conducted at the Wuhan Institute of Virology indicating that |
|
our government knew about the potential of coronavirus experts |
|
at the WIV as well as biosafety concerns at the facility in |
|
general. |
|
The National Institutes of Health until recently, |
|
apparently, made research grants available to the WIV and, |
|
also, made grants available to benefactors of the WIV, |
|
including the EcoHealth Alliance. It would seem unlikely that |
|
the NIH was unaware of the scope of the gain-in-function |
|
experiments occurring in Wuhan. More than a month ago, after |
|
sending a letter to the HHS OIG office requesting specific |
|
information on the NIH's relationship with the WIV, I have not |
|
received answers to any of my questions. |
|
Now this has been a very long year for the American people, |
|
and after a devastating pandemic that has left more than half a |
|
million dead and millions out of work, the very least they |
|
deserve are answers to the questions they continue to have. |
|
This amendment would offer that option by directing the |
|
President to offer an assessment on the likelihood that the |
|
coronavirus was leaked from a laboratory within the People's |
|
Republic of China. It allows for a classified annex to be |
|
applied to this requirement if the President judges it to be in |
|
the national security interest of the United States. |
|
It is true that a simple reporting requirement cannot |
|
establish with certainty that this virus may have escaped from |
|
a lab. However, conducting as thorough an analysis as possible |
|
may allow for a greater clarity as to the potential origins of |
|
the virus, and they could go a long way to informing us on how |
|
to avoid future pandemics. Knowing as much as possible about |
|
the virus' origins is crucial to the future of global health |
|
security. |
|
And before I close, I just want to say, quite honestly, how |
|
disappointed I am in the tenor of this discussion that it has |
|
taken, and I hope we can remain on the subject at hand, which |
|
has nothing to do with race and has everything to do with the |
|
Communist Chinese Party who revels--who revels and delights--in |
|
the fact that we would not even reference them, that we're |
|
cowed, that we are suppressed at referencing their involvement |
|
in whatever happened, wherever it happened, regarding China and |
|
around the globe. And the fact that we would conflate the |
|
horrific acts that were conducted around the country and |
|
somehow link them to our business of trying to get to the truth |
|
for this thing that has plagued not only the world, but the |
|
United States of America is just very, very disappointing to |
|
me, to say the least. So, again, we're just trying to get to |
|
the facts. |
|
I associate myself with the comments of the members on my |
|
side of the aisle in the last portion of the debate, and I |
|
appreciate the opportunity to try and make our country, and the |
|
world, a safer place and acknowledge--and acknowledge--who has |
|
not been helpful, who has not been forthcoming and transparent. |
|
And that is the Communist Chinese Party. That's who it is, not |
|
Chinese-Americans and not the vast majority of Chinese people. |
|
But if we cannot discuss it, well, China's going to win, and |
|
I'm not going to aid or abet that. |
|
And with that, I'm going to calm down, Mr. Chairman, and I |
|
yield back the balance of my time, and urge passage of this |
|
amendment as well. |
|
Chairman Meeks. The gentleman yields back the balance of |
|
his time. |
|
As Mr. Sherman has noted in his opening, this is an |
|
unnecessary amendment, given that the Fiscal Year omnibus bill |
|
contains a reporting requirement on the origins of the virus. |
|
We expect to receive this report from the administration in the |
|
next few days. |
|
Separately, it is critical that any approach to |
|
understanding the virus origins be unbiased and based on facts |
|
and appropriately scoped. And that is not the case with this |
|
amendment. |
|
Mr. Connolly's bill looks forward, seeking to increase |
|
pandemic preparedness, improve interagency coordination, and |
|
leverage support from others to address global health security, |
|
period. Thereby, I oppose this amendment, and yield back the |
|
balance of my time. |
|
Mr. Connolly. Would the chairman yield to me, Mr. Connolly? |
|
Chairman Meeks. Yes, I yield to Mr. Connolly. |
|
Mr. Connolly. Thank you, rather than seeking simple |
|
recognition. |
|
I would just point out, first of all, references to the |
|
tragedy in Atlanta are about context. They're not accusing |
|
anybody on our committee of anything untoward, and certainly |
|
not Mr. Perry in terms of his motivation, which I'm sure is |
|
sincere. |
|
I am recalling for my colleagues, though, we act in a |
|
context, and the context right now is one of great fear in the |
|
Asian-American community throughout our country. That's a fact, |
|
and you can talk to your own Asian-American communities to |
|
confirm it. And therefore, doing something specific that points |
|
to China, when we do not have to do it, I think in this context |
|
is harmful. |
|
Second, I offered a compromise, Mr. Chairman, in terms of |
|
language today. Here's the language: in lieu of both of Mr. |
|
Perry's amendments, we offered to say, add an amendment that |
|
said, ``The President, in coordination with the United States |
|
Coordinator, shall include''--shall include--``in the initial |
|
report,'' required under paragraph 1, ``an evaluation as |
|
practical and appropriate, concerns regarding gain-of-function |
|
research and the potential origins of pandemics, including the |
|
ongoing COVID-19 pandemic.'' |
|
That language would have absolutely encompassed what I |
|
thought Mr. Perry was seeking. But, obviously, my friends, some |
|
of my friends on the other side of the aisle want to be much |
|
more specific in pointing the finger at China. I believe in the |
|
current context in America that's a mistake. I think it would |
|
hurt the bill, and I think it's unnecessary. And that's why I |
|
posed this amendment as well. |
|
Thank you, Mr. Chairman, for yielding. |
|
Chairman Meeks. Reclaiming my time, I now yield back the |
|
balance of my time. |
|
Is there any further debate on the amendment? |
|
Hearing no further requests to speak, the question is on |
|
the Perry Amendment No. 51. |
|
We are going to take a vote by voice. All members, please |
|
unmute your microphone. |
|
All those in favor, say aye. |
|
All those opposed, say no. |
|
In the opinion of the chair, the noes have it, and the |
|
amendment is not agreed to. |
|
And without objection, the motion to reconsider is laid |
|
upon the table. |
|
For what purpose does the gentleman, the Representative |
|
from Pennsylvania, seek recognition? |
|
Mr. Perry. Thank you, Mr. Chairman. I have an amendment at |
|
the desk. I believe it's designated Amendment No. 54. |
|
Chairman Meeks. Hold 1 second. |
|
I believe that there should be the Chabot amendment first. |
|
Mr. Perry. All right, Mr. Chairman, I'll yield. |
|
Chairman Meeks. Mr. Chabot? |
|
Hearing no further requests to speak, the question is on |
|
the Chabot Amendment No. 12. |
|
And with that, I'll take a vote by voice. All members, |
|
please unmute your microphone. |
|
All those in favor, say aye. |
|
All those opposed, say no. |
|
In the opinion of the chair, the ayes have it, and the |
|
amendment is agreed to. |
|
And without objection, the motion to reconsider is laid |
|
upon the table. |
|
Now are there other amendments? |
|
For what purpose does the gentleman from Pennsylvania seek |
|
recognition? |
|
Mr. Perry. Thank you, Mr. Chairman. I believe I have an |
|
amendment at the desk. I believe it's No. 54, unless I stand |
|
corrected. |
|
Chairman Meeks. All right. You're right. |
|
The clerk shall distribute the amendment to your staff |
|
virtually. |
|
Let's pause briefly to give all members enough time to |
|
review the amendment. |
|
Have everybody received a copy of the amendment? |
|
The clerk will please report the amendment. |
|
Ms. Stiles. Perry Amendment No. 54. Amendment to H.R. 391. |
|
At the end of the bill, add the following---- |
|
Chairman Meeks. Without objection, further reading of the |
|
amendment will be dispensed with. |
|
[The Amendment No. 54 of Mr. Perry follows:] |
|
|
|
[GRAPHIC(S) NOT AVAILABLE IN TIFF FORMAT] |
|
|
|
Chairman Meeks. A point of order is reserved. |
|
And the Representative from Pennsylvania, Mr. Perry, is |
|
recognized for 5 minutes in support of the amendment. |
|
Mr. Perry. Thank you very much, Mr. Chairman. I'm certainly |
|
grateful for the opportunity to speak on this amendment today, |
|
a proposal that would mandate the fulfillment of the |
|
recommendations listed in the 2020 China Task Force Report. |
|
Mr. Chairman, we believe that global health security is an |
|
important goal and we must also hold both our adversaries and |
|
our partners accountable when they undermine global health |
|
objectives and U.S. security interests. Specifically, this |
|
amendment would ensure that none of the funds made available to |
|
carry out this Act, the Global Health Security Act, may be used |
|
to make contributions to the World Health Organization until |
|
the WHO undertakes organization-specific reforms. These reforms |
|
include: |
|
First, and very specifically, the resignation of Dr. |
|
Tedros. Dr. Tedros refused to declare a public health emergency |
|
of international concern on January 23d, 2020; in fact, was the |
|
deciding vote against doing so, stymying international |
|
cooperation to contain the spread of this pandemic. He know |
|
that the PRC was withholding information and willfully |
|
promulgated the lies the Communist regime in Beijing was |
|
spewing. On every possible metric, Dr. Tedros has demonstrated |
|
stunning incompetence and bears responsibility for making this |
|
pandemic as bad as it is. |
|
Next year, Dr. Tedros is up for reelection. However, I fear |
|
that the CCP, who promoted Dr. Tedros to this current role, may |
|
use their influence to maintain him in that position. We should |
|
take up the recommendations for reforms of the WHO by removing |
|
by Dr. Tedros from his post before he has an opportunity to |
|
marginalize global health security even further. |
|
Second, we must make sure that Taiwan regains observer |
|
status in the WHO. On this topic, I do not think there is much |
|
opposition among committee members. Taiwan has more than proven |
|
themselves to be a reliable partner on issues of global health |
|
security, and at the very least, merits readmittance to the |
|
World Health Assembly as an observer. But note this will never |
|
happen with Dr. Tedros in power. Both of these reforms go hand- |
|
in-hand. |
|
Third, we must continue to insist on an independent |
|
international investigation with like-minded partners, |
|
including Taiwan, into the CCP's lies during the early going of |
|
the pandemic and the WHO's actions in concealing the missteps |
|
taken by the PRC. |
|
Finally, we must ensure the World Health Organization |
|
undertakes international health regulation reform. It is clear |
|
that, while many countries have still failed to ensure |
|
compliance by the 2005 IHRs, China routinely ignores the IHRs, |
|
despite unquestionably having the capacity to fulfill its |
|
obligations. In doing so, the PRC has clearly highlighted the |
|
need for IHR reform. You've got Article 6, Article 9, Article |
|
10, and Article 12, all that need compliance and adherence to |
|
by the CCP. |
|
It's irresponsible--it is irresponsible--to simply re- |
|
engage with the World Health Organization with no strings |
|
attached. We should be holding them to account and ensure that |
|
they fulfill these recommendations listed in the China Task |
|
Force Report to ensure accountability in international |
|
organizations when they fall short. |
|
I encourage adoption of this amendment, and I yield back |
|
the balance of my time. |
|
Chairman Meeks. The gentleman yields back the balance of |
|
his time. |
|
I now recognize myself for 5 minutes. |
|
Even prior to the current pandemic, Congress recognized the |
|
need to address global health security and to help ensure that |
|
the different actors in the Federal Government helping inform |
|
its response must act collaboratively and with one voice. |
|
The bill does not include any funding for the WHO. Rather, |
|
it is intended to enhance coordination and proposes a mechanism |
|
to actually encourage other donors to invest in global health |
|
security. |
|
While the WHO is not perfect, its technical capabilities |
|
and capacities, and relationships around the world, make it |
|
uniquely placed to help confront the global health challenges |
|
addressed by this Act. The United States is best positioned to |
|
effect positive changes by maintaining our seat at the table. |
|
Attaching artificial limits to our funding forfeits our voice |
|
and erodes our ability to seek reforms. |
|
We're in the midst of a pandemic. The Trump administration |
|
did enough damage to the global public health response by |
|
disengaging with the WHO. The best way to implement change is |
|
to do what the Biden administration is doing, reasserting U.S. |
|
leadership and strengthening our ties with our partners to work |
|
collaboratively--collaboratively--to reform the WHO. |
|
And I yield back the balance of my time. |
|
Who seeks recognition? |
|
Mr. McCaul. Mr. Chairman? |
|
Chairman Meeks. Mr. McCaul, you're recognized for 5 |
|
minutes. |
|
Mr. McCaul. I thank you, Mr. Chair. |
|
And let me say I support this amendment, but let me just |
|
say, Mr. Chairman, whether or not this amendment passes or |
|
fails, I do think you and I and the committee should be |
|
looking, as we're doing with my 5G bill, at the rise of the |
|
Chinese Communist Party within the United Nations. They almost |
|
got the Intellectual Property Organization leadership, which |
|
would be laughable, given their theft of IP. Just like we're |
|
doing with my 5G bill, I think we need to have a thorough |
|
examination of the leadership at the WHO. |
|
We know that Director General Tedros is very close to |
|
President Xi, and he utterly failed the world in the most |
|
important role that he has, to notify the world about the |
|
threat of a global pandemic. When the issue was presented to |
|
him, and when his own expert in Wuhan was telling him it was |
|
transmittable human to human, he cast the tie-breaking vote to |
|
not warn the world of an international global pandemic, or the |
|
risk of it, or that it was human to human. I think he utterly |
|
failed in his most important mission in that job, and I |
|
personally would like to see him replaced. |
|
But I think, moving forward, when we have hearings in this |
|
committee, and particularly, on the Asian-Pacific, we need to |
|
really be examining the leadership of the WHO, because I think |
|
it's factual and it's correct, and it's important for the |
|
United States and the world to have a WHO that does its job |
|
without the influence of the Chinese Communist Party, but, |
|
rather, with the entire world, you know, the best interests of |
|
the entire world, and to protect them from a pandemic in the |
|
future. |
|
So, with that, Mr. Chairman, I look forward to working with |
|
you on this important issue, and I yield back. |
|
Chairman Meeks. The gentleman yields back. |
|
Is there any further debate on the amendment? |
|
Hearing no further requests to speak---- |
|
Mr. Barr. Mr. Chairman? |
|
Chairman Meeks. Who seeks recognition? |
|
Mr. Barr. Barr, Kentucky. |
|
Chairman Meeks. Recognized for 5 minutes. |
|
Mr. Barr. Thank you, Mr. Chairman, and I will not take the |
|
full 5 minutes. I just want to make the point that, in our |
|
hearing with the Secretary of State, I mentioned this issue and |
|
expressed my concern with the administration's decision to |
|
rejoin the World Health Organization and re-engage without a |
|
plan to reform the institution. |
|
We know now, after the WHO's recent report, that the World |
|
Health Organization was aware that there were individuals in |
|
the Wuhan Institute of Virology who were sick in the fall of |
|
2019. And they were aware of human-to-human transmission, and |
|
yet, collaborated and conspired with the Chinese Communist |
|
Party to facilitate this disinformation that enabled the spread |
|
of a global pandemic. |
|
I think the issue of corruption at the World Health |
|
Organization, the legitimate issues of capture of Mr. Tedros |
|
and others at the World Health Organization that have close |
|
ties to the CCP, in facilitating and enabling the spread of |
|
this virus, points to, at minimum, a need to have major |
|
reforms. |
|
And what Mr. Perry's amendment seeks to do is to simply |
|
say, look, if we are going to take the Biden administration's |
|
approach--and there is an argument for re-engaging in the WHO, |
|
and I take the Secretary of State's word that he earnestly |
|
believes that that is the best way forward--if that is the |
|
case, and if you take that position, if we, as Members of |
|
Congress, agree with the administration's approach, at least we |
|
should want the administration to give us a plan for how they |
|
intend to reform the WHO through that engagement and re- |
|
engagement in the WHO. |
|
So, I fully support Mr. Perry's amendment because it just |
|
simply says that, if we're going to rejoin the WHO, we do so on |
|
the condition that there be reforms that make sure that this |
|
kind of misconduct at the WHO never happens again. |
|
With that, I yield back. |
|
Mr. Smith. Mr. Chairman? |
|
Chairman Meeks. Who seeks recognition? Who seeks |
|
recognition? |
|
Mr. Smith. Chris Smith, Mr. Chairman. Mr. Chairman? |
|
Chairman Meeks. Yes. Hold on. Let me go to the Democrat |
|
first. |
|
Representative Gerry Connolly of Virginia---- |
|
Mr. Connolly. Thank you, Mr. Chairman. |
|
Mr. Chairman, I oppose this amendment. Like Mr. Chabot, I'm |
|
the Co-Chair of the Taiwan Caucus. There's been no more |
|
relentless critic of the Communist Party in China and its |
|
leadership than myself. And I would gladly join in a bipartisan |
|
effort to look at, as Mr. McCaul suggests, the nature of the |
|
communist government in China and its malign activities around |
|
the world. |
|
This bill is not about that. This bill is not about WHO. |
|
The fact that Mr. Tedros may have overly praised Chinese |
|
reaction in the early stages of the pandemic is regrettable, |
|
but he was not alone. Perhaps we conveniently forget President |
|
Trump publicly praised President Xi Jinping of China for his |
|
robust and strong crackdown in Wuhan in response to the virus. |
|
It was only later he changed his mind about it. |
|
And so, maybe we need a new leader at WHO. The best way to |
|
decide that is to re-engage in WHO as a member. The decision by |
|
President Trump to withdraw from WHO actually only strengthened |
|
China's influence in the organization because we weren't there. |
|
So, if there are going to be internal reforms, I favor |
|
them, and let's be engaged. But this bill is not the vehicle in |
|
which this committee should be addressing that. This bill is |
|
about how our government organizes itself, so that we're |
|
prepared, so that we have plans, so that we are not caught |
|
short again, as we were a year ago. And I think we need to |
|
stick to that focus. And therefore, I join in your comments, |
|
Mr. Chairman, and I would oppose this amendment on this bill. |
|
I yield back. |
|
Chairman Meeks. The gentleman yields back. |
|
I now recognize the Representative from New Jersey, Mr. |
|
Smith, for 5 minutes. |
|
Mr. Smith. Thank you very much, Mr. Chairman. |
|
And I appreciate that you said that there needs to be |
|
reforms, and I think the more we are specific as to what those |
|
reforms are at WHO, the better. I mean, the lack of |
|
transparency on the part of, first, China and Xi Jinping, who |
|
to this day says that no genocide is occurring against the |
|
Uyghurs in Xinjiang, who has broken his word with impunity vis- |
|
a-vis Hong Kong. I mean, it's a matter of treaty obligation. |
|
And what has the Chinese Community Party done in Hong Kong? |
|
They have put some of the best and the bravest and the |
|
brightest into prison, including Joshua Wong and Martin Lee, |
|
who is undergoing a trial. |
|
So, you've got to realize that when an organization like |
|
WHO, then, poll parrots the disinformation, we have a very |
|
serious problem because it now affects the health of people in |
|
my district, your district, and, of course, the entire world. |
|
With over half a million people dead in the United States |
|
alone, we absolutely deserve absolute transparency, not a group |
|
that goes over there and finds that the Chinese interlocutors |
|
that they're investigating with are not being forthcoming. |
|
So, this has been, I think, very serious, and we should |
|
never ever, ever allow this to be replicated again. And so, |
|
those reforms have to be very real and we've got to get the |
|
transparency. |
|
So, there's been a cover-up here. Xi Jinping is a notorious |
|
liar. He does it in human rights abuse across the board. I have |
|
chaired 75 congressional hearings on human rights abuse in |
|
China. It has never been worse than under Xi Jinping. |
|
And Tedros got his job courtesy of the Chinese Communist |
|
Party. I knew when he was in Ethiopia as a minister, argued |
|
with him many times. There were allegations that he covered up |
|
certain sicknesses that occurred in Ethiopia over time. You |
|
know, he was a very affable guy, very good to talk to, and very |
|
civil. But when you poll parrot misinformation that so |
|
disastrously affects the world and kills so many people, |
|
there's time for accountability. |
|
I have introduced a bill--maybe members of the committee |
|
would like to join in--to provide justice for victims of State |
|
misrepresentations to the World Health Organization, and it's |
|
patterned after JASTA, you might recall, in which we focused on |
|
Saudi Arabia and their complicity in 9/11, to waive the |
|
Sovereign Immunities Act, so that we can try to get some kind |
|
of discovery in a court of law in the United States. Nobody |
|
thought it would happen with JASTA. It was the only bill, to my |
|
recollection, over 8 years where Barack Obama was overridden by |
|
way of veto, because he did veto that bill. And it was |
|
bipartisan because we wanted the truth. We're still not there |
|
in getting the truth about 9/11 and the Saudi Arabian |
|
complicity in that, but we have to have it here. |
|
There's just the loss of life, the morbidity, the economic |
|
losses are incalculable around the world, including in my |
|
district and yours. So, transparency, Mr. Chairman, and we |
|
ought to really be dogged in demanding--do not poll parrot what |
|
this man says, Xi Jinping and his cronies in Beijing. Be |
|
independent. We wouldn't settle for this in a democracy. We |
|
absolutely cannot settle for it in a Chinese Communist Party |
|
dictatorship. |
|
And I thank you, Mr. Chairman. |
|
Chairman Meeks. The gentleman yields back. |
|
Is there any further debate on the amendment? |
|
Mr. Vargas. Vargas from California. |
|
Chairman Meeks. Is recognized for 5 minutes. |
|
Mr. Vargas. Thank you very much, Mr. Chairman. |
|
I also believe in truth and transparency, and I believe |
|
that we shouldn't parrot misinformation, as was stated. So, I'd |
|
like to read some remarks that are direct quotes. |
|
This direct quote: ``I just spoke to President Xi last |
|
night, and, you know, we're working on the problem, the virus. |
|
It's a very tough situation, but I think he's going to handle |
|
it. I think he's handled it really well. We're helping wherever |
|
we can.'' |
|
February 7th: ``Just had a long and very good conversation |
|
by phone with President Xi of China. He is strong, sharp, and |
|
powerful, focused on leading the counterattack to the |
|
coronavirus. He feels they are doing very well, even building |
|
hospitals in a matter of only days. Great discipline taking |
|
place in China, as President Xi strongly leads what will be a |
|
very successful operation. We are working closely with China to |
|
help.'' |
|
Remarks again on February 7th: ``Last night, I had a very |
|
good talk with President Xi, and we talked about, mostly about |
|
the coronavirus. They're working really hard, and I think |
|
they're doing a very good, professional job. They're in touch |
|
with the world, the World Organization, CDC also. We're working |
|
together. But the World Health is working with them. CDC is |
|
working with them. Had a great conversation last night with |
|
President Xi. It's a tough situation. I think we're doing a |
|
very good job.'' |
|
February 10th: ``I think China is very, you know, |
|
professionally run in the sense that they have everything under |
|
control,'' Trump said. ``I really believe they are going to |
|
have it under control fairly soon. You know, in April, |
|
supposedly, it dies with hotter weather, and that's a beautiful |
|
date to look forward to. But China, I can tell you, is working |
|
very hard.'' |
|
``I spoke with President Xi.'' This is February 10th. ``I |
|
spoke with President Xi, and they're working very, very hard, |
|
and I think it's all going to work out fine.'' |
|
February 13th: ``I think they've handled it professionally, |
|
and I think they're extremely capable, and I think President Xi |
|
is extremely capable. And I hope that it's going to be |
|
resolved.'' |
|
I will not go on and on, but I could because there's many, |
|
many more quotes here. So, I do think that it's important to |
|
stop misinformation and not to parrot, and that's why I wanted |
|
to read exact quotes. |
|
Thank you very much, Mr. Chairman. |
|
Mr. Smith. Will my good friend yield for a second? |
|
Mr. Vargas. Sure. Of course. |
|
Mr. Smith. Yes, I appreciate that. |
|
Mr. Vargas. Of course. Of course. |
|
Mr. Smith. And, of course, in those early days, the WHO, |
|
and weeks before, which had access to the information, or |
|
should have, put the gloss of they're doing everything |
|
possible. So, why wouldn't we, all of us, believe at that point |
|
that it wasn't as bad as we might have thought it would be just |
|
a month later, or 2 months later? |
|
So, my point is, the source of the information, the WHO, |
|
which their source was Xi Jinping and his government, you know, |
|
they're the ones who had the primary access to the information. |
|
And, of course, in retrospect, those quotes were misinformed, |
|
no doubt about it, but the people who should have known better |
|
were the top brass, including Tedros, at the WHO. |
|
And I thank my good friend for yielding. |
|
Mr. Vargas. Of course. I reclaim my time. |
|
Mr. Connolly. Will my friend yield, Mr. Vargas? |
|
Mr. Vargas. Why shouldn't we have trusted them? |
|
Yes, of course, I yield to my good friend, Mr. Connolly. |
|
Mr. Connolly. Thank you, Mr. Vargas. This is Mr. Connolly. |
|
I just want to point out what Mr. Smith failed to point out |
|
was, what you quoted were direct conversations between |
|
President Trump and President Xi. They weren't filtered through |
|
the WHO. So, if Tedros made the same mistake, so did Mr. Trump. |
|
Mr. Vargas. Thank you. I reclaim my time. |
|
I was about to State that these quotes were actually not |
|
through the WHO, but I think Mr. Connolly has pointed that out |
|
well. This was a conversation, conversations held between |
|
President Trump and President Xi. |
|
I yield back. Thank you. |
|
Chairman Meeks. The gentleman yields back. |
|
Is there any further debate on the amendment? |
|
Hearing no further requests to speak, the question is on |
|
the Perry Amendment No. 54. |
|
We're going to take a vote by voice. All members, please |
|
unmute your microphones. |
|
All those in favor, say aye. |
|
All those opposed, say no. |
|
In the opinion of the chair, the noes have it, and the |
|
amendment is not agreed upon, is not agreed to. |
|
And without objection, the motion to reconsider is laid |
|
upon the table. |
|
Seeing no further amendments, then, without objection, the |
|
committee will postpone further consideration of H.R. 391. |
|
The committee will be taking a short recess, and we'll, |
|
then, take up the SAFE Act, the Khashoggi Accountability Act, |
|
and H.R. 256. |
|
We stand in recess for 30 minutes. |
|
[Recess.] |
|
Chairman Meeks. I now reconvene this markup. |
|
The question is to report H.R. 391, the Global Health |
|
Security Act of 2021 to the House with the recommendation that |
|
the bill do pass, as amended, and amendments to the bill shall |
|
be reported as a single amendment in the nature of a |
|
substitute. |
|
We're going to take a vote by voice. All members, please |
|
unmute your microphones. |
|
All those in favor, say aye. |
|
All opposed, no. |
|
In the opinion of the chair, the ayes have it. |
|
And without objection, the motion to reconsider is laid |
|
upon the table. |
|
Now we go to consider H.R. 2118, Securing America From |
|
Epidemics Act. |
|
Pursuant to notice, for purposes of markup, I now call up |
|
H.R. 2118. The clerk will report the bill. |
|
Ms. Stiles. H.R. 2118, to authorize the United States |
|
participation in the Coalition for Epidemic---- |
|
Chairman Meeks. Without objection, the first reading of the |
|
bill is dispensed with. |
|
Without objection, the bill shall be considered as read and |
|
open to amendment at any point. |
|
[The bill H.R. 2118 follows:] |
|
|
|
[GRAPHIC(S) NOT AVAILABLE IN TIFF FORMAT] |
|
|
|
|
|
Chairman Meeks. At this time, I recognize myself to speak |
|
on the measure. |
|
The COVID-19 crisis has shown just how interconnected our |
|
world is, and how important vaccines are to ending one of the |
|
greatest catastrophes of the 21st century. This bill addresses |
|
these vital issues. The scientists, researchers, and health |
|
care workers have stepped up in a big way and created a vaccine |
|
in record time. But vaccines by themselves do not end |
|
pandemics. Shots in the arms do. This means we need to have the |
|
means to mass produce vaccines rapidly, as well as the |
|
resources, the logistical knowhow, and political will to get |
|
them out, not just here in the United States, but around the |
|
world. |
|
We must also ensure people around the world have proper |
|
confidence in the vaccine. The collective resources of the |
|
private sector, of multilateral organizations, national |
|
governments, civil society, and health experts are all very |
|
important. |
|
This bill would authorize the United States to participate |
|
in the Coalition for Epidemic Preparedness Innovations, a |
|
private-public partnership that helps accelerate the |
|
development of vaccines against emergent infectious disease, |
|
including Ebola and COVID-19. This has never been more |
|
important, I know, in my lifetime--and I'm getting old. By |
|
supporting CEPI, we demonstrate the value of leveraging the |
|
individual strengths toward collective action, helping develop |
|
vaccines to stop future pandemics. |
|
Now I encourage all of my colleagues to vote for this |
|
important legislation. |
|
I realize that there are members who wish to speak on the |
|
bill and that some members have amendments to offer. Please use |
|
the ``raise your hand'' function on Webex, and I will recognize |
|
members by committee seniority, alternating between Democrats |
|
and Republicans, for the purpose of speaking on the bill first. |
|
If you miss your turn, please let our staff know, and we will |
|
circle back to you. Then, we will move on to amendments. |
|
Do any members wish to speak on the measure? |
|
Mr. Bera. Mr. Chairman, I'd like to speak. This is |
|
Congressman Bera. |
|
Chairman Meeks. You're recognized for 5 minutes. |
|
Mr. Bera. Thank you, Mr. Chairman. And I want to thank both |
|
the chairman and Ranking Member McCaul for including my |
|
legislation, H.R. 2118, the Securing America From Epidemics, or |
|
SAFE, Act. |
|
This legislation, as you mentioned, Mr. Chairman, would |
|
authorize our participation in the Coalition for Epidemic |
|
Preparedness Innovations, or CEPI. Last Congress, this |
|
committee, our committee, passed this. The bill went through |
|
the committee and passed on the House floor on suspension, and |
|
it was also part of the second HEROES Act. In this Congress, |
|
let's get this legislation to the President's desk. |
|
CEPI was an organization that was created in the aftermath |
|
of the 2015 West African Ebola crisis, and its sole function |
|
was to help us get ready for the next pandemic. One of CEPI's |
|
earliest successes, it was one of the early investors in the |
|
Moderna vaccine, which is one of our most effective and safest |
|
vaccines as we combat COVID-19. |
|
By authorizing participation in CEPI, the bill will enable |
|
the United States to firmly claim a seat at the CEPI table, |
|
shape its priorities and governance, and allow Congress to |
|
provide contributions to the organizations. It will also help |
|
us be ready to respond even faster to the next pandemic and |
|
prevent another large-scale event like what we're living |
|
through right now. |
|
Thank you again to Chairman Meeks for your hard work. Thank |
|
you to my colleague, Congressman Brian Fitzpatrick, for being |
|
the co-sponsor of this and the co-lead on this. |
|
And again, I will yield back. Thank you. |
|
Chairman Meeks. The gentleman yields back. |
|
Any other members who wish to speak on the measure? |
|
Hearing no further requests, let's move on to amendments. |
|
For what purpose does the Representative from Pennsylvania, |
|
Mr. Perry, seek recognition? |
|
Mr. Perry. Mr. Chairman, I have an amendment at the desk. |
|
Chairman Meeks. The clerk shall distribute the amendment to |
|
your staff virtually. |
|
Let's pause briefly to give all members enough time to |
|
review the amendment. |
|
Has everyone received a copy of the amendment? |
|
The clerk will please report the amendment. |
|
Ms. Stiles. Perry Amendment No. 53. Add at the end, the |
|
following: The authorization provided under section 3---- |
|
Chairman Meeks. Without objection, further reading of the |
|
amendment will be dispensed with. |
|
[The Amendment No. 53 of Mr. Perry follows:] |
|
|
|
[GRAPHIC(S) NOT AVAILABLE IN TIFF FORMAT] |
|
|
|
Chairman Meeks. A point of order is reserved. |
|
The gentleman from Pennsylvania, Mr. Perry, is recognized |
|
for 5 minutes in support of his amendment. |
|
Mr. Perry. Thank you very much, Mr. Chairman. |
|
I'm proud to introduce this amendment before this committee |
|
today. It is a testament to the great friendship between Taiwan |
|
and the United States and a manifestation of what we've learned |
|
in the past year. Taiwan is a necessary U.S. partner in issues |
|
related to global health security. |
|
From December 31st, 2019, Taiwan has proven that its voice |
|
is one worth having in international institutions. Today, we're |
|
also marking up a bill to 1 day secure Taiwan's position as an |
|
observer in the World Health Organization. This amendment to |
|
the Securing America From Epidemics Act continues the effort to |
|
ensure Taiwan's increased participation in international |
|
organizations. |
|
I recall last year, when the SAFE Act was first taken up, |
|
that one argument in favor of U.S. participation in the |
|
Coalition for Epidemic Preparedness Innovations was that the |
|
People's Republic of China did not contribute or participate in |
|
that organization, and it was an opportunity for the United |
|
States to exercise its sorely needed leadership in pursuit of a |
|
coronavirus vaccine. By allowing Taiwan to join our |
|
international partner on CEPI's Scientific Advisory Committee, |
|
we would be extending a genuine offer of cooperation to a like- |
|
minded partner in pursuit of advancements in global health. |
|
Lest anyone think otherwise, this is in no way a |
|
politically motivated amendment. This is not an amendment aimed |
|
at disparaging the People's Republic of China. It does not |
|
address the fact that an active member of China's Center for |
|
Disease Control sits on the Scientific Advisory Committee. |
|
However, concerning that fact, it actually is. |
|
However, this amendment is solely focused on Taiwan and our |
|
interest in including a partner with a strong track record on |
|
global health issues and working toward the common good. |
|
Specifically, the language of this amendment conditions U.S. |
|
participation in CEPI on the organization's simply extending an |
|
invitation to the agency executive of the Taiwan Center for |
|
Disease Control to join CEPI's Scientific Advisory Committee as |
|
a full voting member. |
|
Certainly, my hope is that this committee, in recognition |
|
of Taiwan's great contributions to the international community, |
|
adopts this amendment in a bipartisan fashion. |
|
With that, Mr. Chairman, I yield back the balance of my |
|
time. |
|
Chairman Meeks. The gentleman yields back the balance of |
|
his time. |
|
I now recognize myself for 5 minutes. |
|
This authorization supports efforts to develop and |
|
distribute vaccines, including for COVID, and has strong |
|
bipartisan support. We've seen through this COVID crisis how |
|
important it is for the United States to lead an efforts to |
|
combat the outbreak, engaging in institutions to positively |
|
influence their actions. |
|
Conditioning our participation in CEPI would not cede the |
|
playing field, not advance the efforts of vaccine development. |
|
CEPI is an association with engagement and support from a |
|
variety of entities from philanthropic foundations to |
|
countries, to individuals, to NGO's. It is not a U.N. body with |
|
member States. The U.S. Government does not determine the |
|
Scientific Advisory's Committee's composition. The Advisory |
|
Committee solicits public nominations. It's free to be |
|
nominated and considered. |
|
While we welcome greater participation by Taiwan in more |
|
international fora, conditioning Taiwan's participating on the |
|
Scientific Advisory Committee, a process we do not control, |
|
could hold up much-needed progress and advancement at this |
|
critical time. Further, CEPI's Scientific Advisory Committee is |
|
a group of experts who support CEPI's work, but explicitly it |
|
does not have final decisionmaking authority over CEPI's |
|
activities, and it is not representative of CEPI's |
|
participants. |
|
Therefore, I oppose this amendment. And I yield back the |
|
balance of my time. |
|
Mr. Bera. Mr. Chairman, may I make a comment? |
|
Chairman Meeks. Yes. |
|
Mr. Bera. This is Congressman Bera. |
|
I appreciate my good friend Pennsylvania's sentiment here, |
|
but I echo the comments of the chairman that anything that |
|
would delay U.S. participation in CEPI is not a good thing, |
|
particularly in the middle of this pandemic. And we have to be |
|
sitting at the table. |
|
I look forward to working with my colleague from |
|
Pennsylvania on ways we can strengthen our relationship with |
|
Taiwan, get Taiwan into multilateral and international |
|
organizations, where they belong, and again, continue to send a |
|
strong message of our friendship and partnership with Taiwan. |
|
So, with that, Mr. Chairman, I will yield back. |
|
Chairman Meeks. Yes. I gave you time. So, I now will |
|
reclaim my time and yield back the balance of my time. |
|
Is there any further request for debate on the amendment? |
|
Hearing no further requests to speak, the question is on |
|
the amendment. |
|
We're going to take a vote by voice. All members, please |
|
unmute your microphones. |
|
All those in favor, say aye. |
|
All those opposed, no. |
|
In the opinion of the chair, the noes have it, and the |
|
amendment is not agreed to. |
|
And the motion to reconsider is laid upon the table. |
|
Mr. Gonzalez. Mr. Chairman, I request a recorded vote. |
|
Chairman Meeks. A roll call vote is requested. |
|
Pursuant to Committee Rule 4(a)(2), further proceedings on |
|
the amendment shall be postponed. |
|
Are there any other amendments? |
|
Seeing no further amendment, then, without objection, the |
|
committee will postpone further consideration of H.R. 2118 and |
|
move to consider H.R. 1464. |
|
We now move on to consider H.R. 1464, the Khashoggi |
|
Accountability Act. Pursuant to notice, for purposes of markup, |
|
I now call up H.R. 1464. The clerk will report the bill. |
|
Ms. Stiles. H.R. 1464, to impose sanctions with respect to |
|
foreign persons listed in the Office of the Director of---- |
|
Chairman Meeks. Without objection, the first reading of the |
|
bill is dispensed with. |
|
And without objection, the bill shall be considered as read |
|
and open to amendment at any point. |
|
[The bill H.R. 1464 follows:] |
|
|
|
[GRAPHIC(S) NOT AVAILABLE IN TIFF FORMAT] |
|
|
|
Chairman Meeks. Three amendments to this bill will be |
|
distributed to members in advance, and I understand members are |
|
prepared to voice vote them. |
|
Without objection, the three amendments, the Malinowski No. |
|
1 amendment, Malinowski No. 2 amendment, and Omar No. 26 are |
|
agreed to en bloc. |
|
[The Amendment No. 1 of Mr. Malinowski, Amendment No. 2 of |
|
Mr. Malinowski, and Amendment No. 26 of Ms. Omar en bloc |
|
follow:] |
|
|
|
[GRAPHIC(S) NOT AVAILABLE IN TIFF FORMAT] |
|
|
|
Chairman Meeks. We're going to take a vote by voice. All |
|
members, please unmute your microphones. |
|
All those in favor, say aye. |
|
All those opposed, say no. |
|
In the opinion of the chair, the ayes have it, and the |
|
motion to reconsider is laid on the table. |
|
At this time, I recognize myself to speak on the measure. |
|
The brutal murder of Jamal Khashoggi, a Washington Post |
|
columnist and U.S. permanent resident, shocked Americans, |
|
including myself. The Biden administration's release of the DNI |
|
report on the killing was a good step toward accountability, |
|
but further steps need to be taken. |
|
Together with Mr. Connolly's bill, Mr. Malinowski's |
|
Khashoggi Accountability Act ensures a thorough and sufficient |
|
response to Saudi Arabia's repressive actions of the killing of |
|
Mr. Khashoggi. Rep. Malinowski's bill mandates visa sanctions |
|
on anyone, including Saudi officials, deemed responsible for |
|
the killing. It absolutely will result in an expanded universe |
|
of sanctions on Saudi officials who have not yet been punished. |
|
This will be a strong imposition of Congress' authority and an |
|
important step in defending not only American values, but |
|
American residents and American citizens. |
|
The legislation does include national security waiver |
|
authority, but such waivers must be exercised each time such a |
|
Saudi official seeks U.S. entry and a justification must be |
|
sent to Congress for each entry. |
|
I want to thank Mr. Malinowski for his work on this |
|
legislation and, indeed, for his tireless work on behalf of |
|
human rights around the entire world. |
|
I encourage all of my colleagues to vote for this important |
|
legislation. |
|
I now recognize the ranking member, Mr. McCaul, for his |
|
remarks. |
|
I realize that I do not see Mr. McCaul. |
|
So, I realize members wish to speak on the bill and that |
|
some members have amendments to offer. Please use the ``raise |
|
your hand'' function of Webex, and I will recognize members by |
|
committee seniority, alternating between Democrats and |
|
Republicans, for the purpose of speaking on the bill first. If |
|
you miss your turn, please let our staff know and we will |
|
circle back to you. Then, we will move on to amendments. |
|
I now recognize Representative David Cicilline of Rhode |
|
Island for the purpose of speaking on the bill for 5 minutes. |
|
[No response.] |
|
Chairman Meeks. Are there any other members who wish to |
|
speak on this measure? |
|
Mr. Connolly. Mr. Chairman? |
|
Mr. Malinowski. Mr. Chairman? |
|
Chairman Meeks. Yes, Mr. Malinowski, you're recognized for |
|
5 minutes. |
|
Mr. Malinowski. Thank you. I heard Mr. Connolly also ask to |
|
speak. I would be happy to let him go first, if he would like |
|
to. |
|
Mr. Connolly. I sought to speak simply to thank you, Mr. |
|
Malinowski, for your leadership on human rights in general and |
|
your deep interest in the grisly murder of Jamal Khashoggi. I |
|
know that insisting on justice in this case is something |
|
vitally important to the Saudi community here, but to his |
|
family and to especially his fiancee who needs closure. And we |
|
need not only closure on this terrible tragedy, but we need to |
|
bring people to justice. Your persistence in this matter is |
|
something that I very much salute, and I want to congratulate |
|
you and thank you for this piece of legislation. |
|
With that, I yield back, Mr. Chairman. |
|
Chairman Meeks. The gentleman yields back. |
|
Is there anyone else who would like to speak on the |
|
measure? |
|
I recognize Mr. Malinowski for 5 minutes. |
|
Mr. Malinowski. Thank you so much, Mr. Chairman. |
|
Thank you so much, Mr. Connolly. I think our measures are a |
|
good one-two punch here today, serving the same interest. I |
|
know that Mr. Khashoggi was your constituent and you have a |
|
particularly personal in making sure that his family sees the |
|
accountability that they deserve. |
|
Look, we've spoken a lot in this committee about important |
|
issues inside Saudi Arabia--about the treatment of dissidents |
|
and women's rights activities. We've talked about the suffering |
|
imposed on the people of Yemen and that country's brutal civil |
|
war. And those are all very important issues that are part of |
|
the relationship between the United States and Saudi Arabia. |
|
But the murder of Jamal Khashoggi, as I've often argued, is |
|
a very different matter. This is not something that the Saudi |
|
government did to somebody inside Saudi Arabia. This is a |
|
deliberate decision by the de facto ruler of the country to |
|
reach inside the United States to threaten and, then, kill a |
|
resident of our country because that person living in our |
|
country was criticizing the Saudi leadership. |
|
And it's not the only example of this kind of behavior. The |
|
former Saudi intelligence chief, Saad Al Jabry, a very close |
|
ally of the United States, has made, I think, very credible |
|
allegations that the Saudi government sent a hit squad to kill |
|
him. He's living in Canada. And they operated inside the United |
|
States. |
|
Yesterday, just yesterday, the United Nations confirmed a |
|
story that a Saudi government official had threatened Agnes |
|
Callamard, who was the U.N. Special Rapporteur on Extrajudicial |
|
Executions, threatened that she would be ``taken care of,'' |
|
quote-unquote, if she continued her advocacy on the Khashoggi |
|
case. |
|
Now the Biden administration, very, very commendably, |
|
released the report identifying the Crown Prince MBS as being |
|
the author of this crime. And in addition, the administration |
|
laid out a much-needed policy of zero tolerance for this kind |
|
of extraterritorial repression--Saudi Arabia and other |
|
countries reaching into the United States to go after their |
|
enemies. |
|
This bill makes good on that pledge. It's very measured. It |
|
basically gives effect to existing U.S. laws, no more. For |
|
example, Section 7031 of the Consolidated Appropriations Act, |
|
current law, says that, if the Secretary of State has credible |
|
evidence that a foreign government official is responsible for |
|
a gross human rights abuse, that official shall be denied entry |
|
into the United States, unless the Secretary of State issues a |
|
waiver. This bill simply gives effect and clarity to that |
|
provision of law. It is identical to legislation we passed in |
|
the House in 2019 overwhelmingly. |
|
A second key provision in existing law--it's been in place |
|
for over 30 years--says that, and this is under the Arms Export |
|
Control Act, says that, if a foreign government is engaged in a |
|
consistent pattern of trying to threaten, intimidate, or harass |
|
persons in the United States, then we cannot sell arms to that |
|
country. |
|
This legislation simply asks the State Department to make a |
|
determination to us in 6 months as to whether Saudi Arabia is |
|
still at that point engaged in such a consistent pattern. |
|
Again, this is about threatening and killing people inside the |
|
United States of America, not really talking about human rights |
|
inside Saudi Arabia. |
|
I do not want to blow up our relationship with Saudi |
|
Arabia. We have interest in maintaining that relationship, |
|
including helping them defend themselves and defending our |
|
troops. But Saudi Arabia also has an interest in preserving its |
|
relationship with the United States. In fact, they need us a |
|
lot more than we need them. |
|
This legislation, just as Mr. Connolly's, is about shifting |
|
the burden of preserving this relationship where it belongs, |
|
onto Saudi Arabia, so that we are not constantly asked to |
|
overlook Saudi Arabia's sins against us for the sake of our |
|
relationship with them. That is the definition of an unhealthy |
|
and unbalanced relationship. We are trying to restore that |
|
balance. |
|
I thank the chairman for his support. |
|
I see my colleague Andy Kim as well, who is co-sponsor of |
|
this bill. Thank you, Andy. |
|
I'm also very pleased to have been able to work with |
|
Ranking Member McCaul to bring the legislation to fruition. |
|
Thank you all. I yield back. |
|
Chairman Meeks. The gentleman's time has expired. |
|
I now recognize Ranking Member McCaul for 5 minutes. |
|
Mr. McCaul. Thank you, Mr. Chairman. And I want to thank |
|
Mr. Malinowski and you for working with us. |
|
I want to thank the staff that worked tirelessly around the |
|
clock to continue the bipartisan spirit of this committee and |
|
to reach a compromise agreement on Mr. Malinowski's bill. |
|
It's an attempt to really balance our concerns about the |
|
gruesome murder of Khashoggi versus geopolitical interests in |
|
the region and the threat from Iran. I think our relationship |
|
with the Saudis covers many strategic interests, including the |
|
very real and deadly threat of Iran. Iran attacked Saudi Arabia |
|
in September 2019, and Iran-backed Houthis are attacking Saudi |
|
almost every day. |
|
As Congressman Malinowski mentioned, I think we can |
|
strongly advocate for human rights in the Kingdom and Saudi |
|
nationals abroad without leaving Saudi Arabia and Americans |
|
living in Saudi Arabia vulnerable to these threats. With these |
|
changes--and again, I want to thank the gentleman from New |
|
Jersey for working really almost to the last minute to get a |
|
good result, so we can call this bipartisan--with these |
|
changes, I believe this measure now allows us to help the |
|
Saudis defend themselves against these threats. And that was my |
|
biggest concern. |
|
This sound measure recognizes the importance of human |
|
rights while preserving our strategic relationship with the |
|
Kingdom. And I'm grateful for the teamwork here. |
|
And I think, as Congressman Malinowski stated, the events |
|
of what happened to Khashoggi were horrible, but I also think |
|
we need to look at, again, the alliance of Israel with Saudi, |
|
our partnership with the Saudis. We know from the Ayatollah |
|
that they're on a path to a nuclear bomb; that they're about 60 |
|
percent enriched now; that they could be at 90 percent in a |
|
matter of months. And they have short-range missile capability |
|
that I do not believe the Saudis are capable of defending |
|
themselves, unless we help them. And so, this bill condemns the |
|
human rights violations while at the same time preserves the |
|
security of Saudi to defend itself as a Nation. |
|
And so, I want to thank the two of you for working hard |
|
with me to get to the point where we are today. |
|
And with that, I yield back. |
|
Chairman Meeks. The gentleman yields back. |
|
I now recognize Representative Susan Wild of Pennsylvania |
|
for 5 minutes. |
|
Ms. Wild. Thank you, Mr. Chairman. |
|
Two years ago, Jamal Khashoggi's fiancee, Hatice Cengiz, |
|
testified before this committee, and in heartbreaking detail, |
|
she recounted his disappearance inside the Saudi consulate in |
|
Istanbul, where he was brutally assassinated under direct |
|
orders from the Saudi Crown Prince, Mohammed bin Salman, or |
|
MBS. |
|
And after her testimony, I spoke with Ms. Cengiz and |
|
assured her that the United States would ultimately work to |
|
deliver justice and accountability in the wake of her fiance's |
|
assassination. We must keep that promise. That means rendering |
|
MBS and every individual implicated in this case ineligible for |
|
admission into the United States, as this legislation would do, |
|
regardless of the position, power, or wealth that they possess. |
|
The report by the Office of the Director of National |
|
Intelligence that the Biden administration recently |
|
declassified could not be clearer. It stated, ``We assess that |
|
Saudi Arabia's Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman approved an |
|
operation in Istanbul, Turkey to capture or kill Mr. |
|
Khashoggi.'' |
|
This isn't only about exposing a major breach of |
|
international law and an attack meant to silence journalists |
|
and dissidents everywhere. It is also about sending an |
|
unequivocal message: we will not allow these kinds of acts to |
|
be committed with impunity. |
|
Reporting just this week underscores why this legislation |
|
is so crucial. According to these reports, officials at the |
|
highest level of the Saudi regime made death threats against |
|
the United Nations Special Rapporteur who led the U.N.'s |
|
investigation into Mr. Khashoggi's assassination. Even in the |
|
midst of global outrage, the Saudi regime continued to engage |
|
in gangster-like tactics against anyone working to expose the |
|
truth about the regime's actions. We cannot allow it to |
|
continue to operate like this. It is beyond time to make clear |
|
that Members of Congress and this committee, and beyond, are |
|
prepared to stand up against the abuses of the Saudi regime. |
|
I urge my colleagues to join me in passing this legislation |
|
by a resounding bipartisan margin. |
|
With that, Mr. Chairman, I yield back. |
|
Chairman Meeks. The gentlelady yields back. |
|
I now recognize Representative Scott Perry of Pennsylvania |
|
for 5 minutes. |
|
Mr. Perry. Thank you very much, Mr. Chairman. |
|
And I just want to just add to the conversation, while I |
|
think that, certainly, accountability and responsibility in |
|
this matter, which is, indeed, horrific and did, indeed, shock |
|
me and the rest of the world, this accountability, this |
|
responsibility is absolutely in order. |
|
And I would also say that accountability and responsibility |
|
regarding members of the Muslim Brotherhood, even though they |
|
do not occupy a nation State, so to speak, as a government, but |
|
they exist within governments, and they exist to terminate the |
|
U.S. Government as we know it and Western civilization as we |
|
know it, and Americans, and they have done so in the past. And |
|
I hope that in the future that the members of this committee |
|
will join me and endeavor to call them out and assign |
|
responsibility and accountability for the actions that they |
|
have conducted and the actions they seek to conduct, not only |
|
in the United States, but in the Western civilized world, and |
|
hold them accountable as well. |
|
And so, whether it's this journalist or whether it's United |
|
States journalists as well, I'm concerned about the silencing, |
|
not only by authoritarian regimes, but we see it right here in |
|
the United States of America. We see this cancel culture |
|
happening, and I'm not wishing to draw the exact parallel for |
|
what happened to Mr. Khashoggi, but it doesn't start with the |
|
untimely death of journalists. That's not where it starts. |
|
That's where it ends. It starts with this intimidation that is |
|
happening in our country as well by certain portions that |
|
dislike certain narratives that they do not want to hear about |
|
or want to discredit. |
|
And so, I think we need be mindful of that. We need to be |
|
mindful of the Muslim Brotherhood as well. And I look forward |
|
to working with the committee members on bills in the future |
|
that hold them accountable for their malign activities and |
|
wishes as well. |
|
And with that, Mr. Chairman, I yield back the balance. |
|
Chairman Meeks. The gentleman yields back. |
|
I now recognize Representative Andy Kim of New Jersey for 5 |
|
minutes. |
|
Mr. Kim of New Jersey. Thank you, Chairman, for yielding to |
|
me here. |
|
I want to thank my colleague from New Jersey, Mr. |
|
Malinowski, for his leadership here. I've been very proud to be |
|
able to work alongside him to be able to move this forward, |
|
because I really want to make sure that we understand that this |
|
is not a choice between accountability and justice on one side |
|
and our national security and our interests on the other. I am |
|
doing this, I am voting in favor of this because of our |
|
interests, because of the need for us to be able to demonstrate |
|
what a successful and healthy alliance and relationship and |
|
partnership is all about. |
|
This is not an element where this would potentially derail |
|
our partnership or our engagement and our relationship with |
|
Saudi Arabia. The Crown Prince has already done the damage. The |
|
damage has been done to our partnership, and this is an effort |
|
to try to heal that, to try to put forward steps for us to be |
|
able to heal and see whether or not we can repair this in the |
|
way that is necessary for us to be able to move forward. |
|
This is potentially a person who will be leader of his |
|
nation for half a century, and it is very important for us at |
|
this point to make sure that we very clearly articulate what |
|
terms that will be on. And I'd rather it be on our terms rather |
|
than their terms, and this is our way of trying to assert |
|
American leadership and determination of how we define our role |
|
with our partners, as well as globally. |
|
So, I would just very strongly support this effort. I'm |
|
appreciative of Mr. Malinowski and others for moving this |
|
forward and being able to get the wide support that we need to, |
|
and look forward to its passage. |
|
Chairman Meeks. The gentleman yields back. |
|
Are there any other members who wish to speak on the |
|
measure? |
|
Hearing no further requests, let's move on to amendments. |
|
Are there any amendments? |
|
Hearing no amendments---- |
|
Mr. Malinowski. Mr. Chairman? |
|
Chairman Meeks. Yes? Who's seeking---- |
|
Mr. Malinowski. I have an amendment at the desk. |
|
Chairman Meeks. You have an amendment at the desk? I'm |
|
trying to find it. I think we passed your amendment. |
|
Mr. Malinowski. Oh, did we pass it? |
|
Chairman Meeks. Yes, sir. |
|
Mr. Malinowski. You're right. Sorry, I was following the |
|
old script. I apologize. |
|
[Laughter.] |
|
Chairman Meeks. Not a problem. So, we're going to now move |
|
to final passage. The question is to report H.R. 1464, the |
|
Khashoggi Accountability Act, to the House with the |
|
recommendation that the bill do pass, as amended, and |
|
amendments to the bill shall be reported as a single amendment |
|
in the nature of a substitute. |
|
We're going to take a vote by voice. All members, please |
|
unmute your microphones. |
|
All those in favor, say aye. |
|
All opposed, no. |
|
In the opinion of the chair, the ayes have it, and the |
|
motion to reconsider is laid upon the table. The measure is |
|
favorably reported, as amended, and without objection, |
|
amendments to the bill shall be reported as a single amendment |
|
in the nature of a substitute. |
|
Without objection, staff is authorized to make any |
|
technical and conforming changes. |
|
Now we move on to consider H.R. 256, to repeal the |
|
Authorization for Use of Military Force Against Iraq Resolution |
|
of 2002. |
|
Pursuant to notice, for purpose of markup, I now call up |
|
H.R. 256, and the clerk will report the bill. |
|
Ms. Stiles. H.R. 256, a bill to repeal the Authorization |
|
for Use of Military Force Against Iraq Resolution of 2002. |
|
Chairman Meeks. Without objection, the first reading of the |
|
bill is dispensed with. |
|
Without objection, the bill shall be considered as read and |
|
open to amendment at any point. |
|
[The bill H.R. 256 follows:] |
|
|
|
[GRAPHIC(S) NOT AVAILABLE IN TIFF FORMAT] |
|
|
|
|
|
Chairman Meeks. At this time, I recognize myself to speak |
|
on the measure. |
|
Early this week, we heard from a bipartisan panel of former |
|
executive branch attorneys who are among the foremost experts |
|
on authorizations to use military force. All of them, whether |
|
Republican or Democrat, testified that this committee should |
|
repeal the 2002 Authorization for Use of Military Force against |
|
Iraq and not replace it. |
|
The conversation about a 2002 AUMF did not begin this week, |
|
however, or this year, or even in the last decade. This |
|
committee has held numerous hearings on this issue. The text we |
|
are considering today has already been passed by the House as |
|
an amendment to the NDAA. |
|
I am always the first to emphasize the importance of |
|
dialog, conversation, and negotiation, but we must also be able |
|
to distinguish between issues that need more discussion and |
|
issues that are ready for action. The 2002 AUMF is ready for |
|
action. |
|
It was passed to authorize a war against Saddam Hussein |
|
almost 20 years ago, when I had first arrived at the Congress. |
|
The text of the resolution makes the purpose clear. It |
|
authorizes the President to, one, defend the national security |
|
of the United States against the continuing threat posed by |
|
Iraq, and, two, enforce all relevant United Nations Security |
|
Council resolutions regarding Iraq. These resolutions are long |
|
since expired. Iraq is a security partner of the United States. |
|
Saddam Hussein is long gone. No current operations depend on a |
|
2002 AUMF. Those operations would continue under the 2001 AUMF, |
|
which is the AUMF we passed to deal with terrorists. |
|
Some members may look to the ``whereas'' clauses of the |
|
2002 AUMF, which mention debunked links between Saddam |
|
Hussein's regime and terrorist groups. But, again, the text is |
|
what makes the purpose clear. Each clause builds a case against |
|
Saddam Hussein's regime. None of them authorize force against |
|
terrorist groups. |
|
This AUMF also does not authorize force against Iran. It |
|
doesn't mention Iran at all. America's resolve to stand up to |
|
Iran and its proxies is not in question here. So, this |
|
resolution simply is not about Iran. |
|
America does face serious challenges in Iraq. There are |
|
continuing threats from Iranian-backed militants. There are |
|
threats from ISIS and Al Qaeda. That said, the 2002 AUMF |
|
doesn't help us deal with any of these threats. Our forces |
|
would stay in Iraq under the 2001 AUMF, and the President can |
|
always defend America and our forces under Article II. All of |
|
our witnesses made that clear. |
|
Now some of our witnesses also said we should take out the |
|
2001 AUMF along with the 2002 AUMF. And I understand that view. |
|
Many of us have been calling for action on the 2001 AUMF for |
|
years, and I committed to replacing the 2001 AUMF with a more |
|
focused authority. But much more work is needed on that effort. |
|
So, in the meantime, there is absolutely no reason to delay |
|
the 2002 AUMF simply because we do not have an agreement yet on |
|
the 2001 AUMF, which is the 2001 is entirely a different |
|
authority for entirely a different war. The authority provided |
|
in the 2001 AUMF is still needed. The authority for the 2002 |
|
AUMF simply is not. Repeal the one that's not needed. Keep the |
|
one that is. That's simple. |
|
Some might ask, what harm could come from leaving the 2002 |
|
AUMF on the books, even though it's not needed? Keeping it in |
|
place leaves the door wide open for future administrations to |
|
claim Congress already authorized action we clearly never |
|
envisioned when the 2002 AUMF was written. It's happened many |
|
times before. That's the whole point of this effort. |
|
If you agree the President should come to Congress before |
|
taking action beyond his Article II power, we cannot leave |
|
unneeded AUMFs on the books. I assure all of my colleagues that |
|
we will continue to discuss the solemn issues surrounding |
|
Congress' war power, including the 2001 AUMF and the War Powers |
|
Resolution. Those laws will need to be carefully reformed, but |
|
the 2002 AUMF, it's different. It doesn't need to be reformed. |
|
It simply needs to be repealed. |
|
I urge all of my colleagues to support this important |
|
bipartisan legislation and to repeal the 2002 AUMF in this |
|
historic committee vote. |
|
I now recognize Ranking Member McCaul for his remarks. |
|
Mr. McCaul. Thank you, Mr. Chairman. And I appreciate the |
|
excellent hearing and discussion we held on Tuesday to begin |
|
exploring serious war powers reform. I think we all agree we |
|
would abdicate our Article I responsibility. And we need to |
|
look at updating these very old authorized uses of military |
|
force. |
|
I think we have kind of the same goal in mind. I think we |
|
just have a different way of getting there. For that reason, I |
|
oppose rushing this standalone repeal just 2 days after having |
|
this conversation without the due diligence I think is |
|
required. And as insightful and as helpful as the witnesses |
|
were, I think, in fact Professor Goldsmith agreed that if we |
|
repeal 2002, we need to concurrently have an updated authorized |
|
use of military force, but I also think we need to consult with |
|
more than just three professors who have not had access to |
|
intelligence or targeting decisions for years. |
|
Doing this the right way I think involves consulting with |
|
the Department of State and the Department of Defense, the |
|
White House, the intelligence community, the Government of |
|
Iraq, and our coalition partners and allies to fully understand |
|
the impact of just an outright standalone repeal. |
|
And I understand the desire--and I think the chairman makes |
|
some good points--I understand the desire to repeat 2002 AUMF, |
|
as well as the 2001. But I believe we must do this as part of a |
|
comprehensive, updated replacement to provide clear authorities |
|
against the terrorists who still plot to kill Americans at home |
|
and abroad. And we were reminded of that with the recent proxy |
|
Shia militia attacks against our servicemen and women. |
|
I believe the threat is not gone, it has just evolved. The |
|
2002 AUMF clearly addresses terrorist threats arising in Iraq. |
|
And while people can disagree about whether it should still be |
|
used, it has been used for that purpose by every prior |
|
administration since 9/11, both Republican and Democrat. |
|
The Obama and Trump administrations even used identical |
|
language to describe the scope of the 2002. ``The statute, in |
|
accordance with its expressed goals, has always been understood |
|
to authorize use of force for the related dual purposes of |
|
helping to establish a stable, democratic Iraq, and of |
|
addressing, most importantly, terrorist threats emanating from |
|
Iraq.'' |
|
I think this could be updated to terrorist threats |
|
emanating out of Iran. |
|
There are terrorist groups that are very active today, as |
|
we heard in our classified hearing. And I appreciate the |
|
chairman putting that together. Inside Iraq they threaten our |
|
diplomats, our soldiers, and our partners who cannot be |
|
targeted under the 2001 AUMF because they are not associated |
|
with the forces of Al-Qaeda, the Taliban, or ISIS. A rushed, |
|
standalone repeal of our Iraq force authority sends a message |
|
of U.S. disengagement that could destabilize Iraq, embolden |
|
Iran, and strengthen Al-Qaeda, and ISIS. |
|
I think it sends the wrong message. It could cost life. |
|
That danger could be eliminated if we, if we took up the task |
|
of repeal and replacement together, as was discussed at our |
|
hearing. Real AUMF reform requires Congress and the |
|
Administration, working together on actual texts, to replace |
|
the aging 2001, 2002 AUMFs to provide authorities needed to |
|
keep the American people, and most importantly, our deployed |
|
troops, safe from terrorists. |
|
I look forward to working with you, Mr. Chairman. I think |
|
you will see, honestly, there is a lot of bipartisan support. |
|
And we, we have had our discussions. I think this committee |
|
should continue to discuss updating the old AUMFs after all. |
|
Some of our troops over there serving weren't even born, |
|
they were born after 9/11. And I do think it is time. And I am |
|
willing to go down a discussion of repealing the 2001 and 2002 |
|
AUMFs, but only if we can update it with a AUMF that really |
|
addresses the modern day threats and, with the 2002 one, |
|
particularly the threats emanating out of Iran that we have |
|
seen recently. |
|
And I was actually supportive of President Biden's decision |
|
to proportionately strike back because that is the only way you |
|
are going to deter them. And I think President Biden--you may |
|
not hear me say this all the time--I think he did the right |
|
thing here. |
|
And I know that that got some on the other side of the |
|
aisle upset, but I think it was the right message to the |
|
terrorists who attacked our Green Zone and servicemen and |
|
women, including in Erbil. |
|
And so, let me close with I look forward to having this |
|
great debate. Nothing is more serious on this committee than |
|
issues of war and peace. And this is right to the heart of it. |
|
I am all for re-exercising our authorities. I just want to do |
|
it the way I think is the right way to proceed. |
|
And with that, Mr. Chairman, I yield back. |
|
Chairman Meeks. The gentleman yields back. |
|
I realize members wish to speak on the bill, and that some |
|
members have amendments to offer. Please use the raised hand |
|
function on Webex and I will recognize members by committee |
|
seniority, alternating between Democrats and Republicans, for |
|
the purpose of speaking on the bill first. |
|
If you miss your turn, let our staff know and we will |
|
circle back to you. Then we will move on to amendments. |
|
I now recognize Representative David Cicilline of Rhode |
|
Island for 5 minutes to speak on the bill. |
|
Mr. Cicilline. Thank you, Chairman Meeks. And thank you for |
|
including H.R. 256 in today's markup. And thank you to my |
|
friend Barbara Lee for her longtime advocacy on this very |
|
important issue. Her leadership on the fundamental question of |
|
the role of Congress in matters of war in Congress has been |
|
unwavering, and we owe her a debt of gratitude for her |
|
commitment to bring this issue to the forefront. |
|
Nearly two decades ago, Congress passed a resolution |
|
authorizing military force against the Iraqi regime of Saddam |
|
Hussein. That resolution, aided in its passage by deeply flawed |
|
intelligence that we now know had no basis in fact, authorized |
|
the use of force for two express purposes: to defend the |
|
national security of the U.S. against the continuing threat |
|
posed by Iraq, and to enforce all relevant U.N. Security |
|
Council resolutions regarding Iraq. |
|
It has been 18 years since Saddam Hussein was deposed. It |
|
has been a decade since the United States declared a formal end |
|
of operations in Iraq. The Iraqi Government is a regional |
|
partner and the U.N. Security Council resolution referenced |
|
above has been fulfilled. In short, there is no reason to allow |
|
the 2002 AUMF to continue to stand. |
|
Congress must not forfeit its constitutional responsibility |
|
to directly authorize the use of force. Any administration |
|
should receive direct authorization from the Congress to engage |
|
in global conflict. |
|
Just 2 days ago, this committee had a productive hearing |
|
where each of the three expert witnesses testified that this |
|
AUMF is not necessary. It does not enhance our national |
|
security. It does not make Americans any safer. It does not |
|
make the mission of our men and women in uniform any easier. |
|
To repeat this resolution would not tie the hands of the |
|
current Administration, or any future administration in their |
|
responsibility to preserve the national security of the United |
|
States. It would, instead, ensure that it could not be |
|
manipulated to take us into a war that Congress did not |
|
authorize. |
|
We must act to let Congress again assert its ability and |
|
responsibility to authorize war. We must pass H.R. 256 and show |
|
the American people and our men and women in uniform that this |
|
country only goes to war when absolutely necessary, and all |
|
other options are exhausted, and when specifically authorized |
|
by Congress. |
|
I again thank Representative Lee for her leadership on this |
|
issue. And I encourage my colleagues to join me in supporting |
|
H.R. 256. And with that, I yield back. |
|
Chairman Meeks. The gentleman yields back. |
|
I now recognize Representative Joe Wilson of South Carolina |
|
for 5 minutes. |
|
Mr. Wilson. Thank you, Mr. Chairman. And, Mr. Chairman, |
|
Ranking Member McCaul, and colleagues, I oppose H.R. 256 to |
|
standalone repeal of the 2002 authorization for use of military |
|
force against Iraq. I support the Perry Amendment No. 57. |
|
As the grateful dad of two servicemembers who have served |
|
in Iraq, I know firsthand the success of liberating the people |
|
of Iraq from an authoritarian dictatorship for an opportunity |
|
for freedom. While modernization of this authorization is |
|
prudent, any repeal should be done concurrently with |
|
replacement after full consideration and consultation with |
|
relevant partners. Our primary focus should be updating the |
|
2002 AUMF to provide our national security apparatus the |
|
necessary authorization to mitigate and defeat transnational |
|
terrorist threats abroad to protect American families at home. |
|
By bypassing key stakeholders, the White House, Department |
|
of Defense, Department of State, the Iraqi Government, and our |
|
allies, the consideration to repeal the 2002 AUMF, with no |
|
replacement, is counterproductive. This amounts to a largely |
|
symbolic measure designed to address shortsighted ideological |
|
demands, and will embolden enemies in the region who are |
|
targeting American families. |
|
Mr. Chairman, I strongly oppose the standalone repeal and |
|
urge colleagues to avoid weakening our ability to conduct |
|
counterterrorism operations and, instead, to address repeal and |
|
replacement simultaneously, as proposed by the Perry Amendment |
|
No. 52. |
|
I yield back my time. |
|
Chairman Meeks. The gentleman yields back his time. |
|
I now recognize Representative Ted Lieu of California for 5 |
|
minutes. |
|
I now recognize Representative Susan Wild of Pennsylvania |
|
for 5 minutes. |
|
Ms. Wild. Thank you, Mr. Chairman. |
|
H.R. 256, repealing the authorization of military force |
|
against Iraq is an important step in a much broader effort, |
|
clearly reasserting Congress' constitutional authority to |
|
authorize and limit our country's military operations. We in |
|
the House are the elected representatives of the American |
|
people. We are closest to the people of our communities and to |
|
the men and women from our communities that serve on the front |
|
lines of our armed forces. |
|
For far too long, presidents of both parties have |
|
overreached beyond their roles as defined in the Constitution, |
|
using existing AUMF to prolong or extend conflicts beyond what |
|
Congress had authorized. It is past time that we reclaim the |
|
authority that the framers clearly established in our hands. |
|
There are no more consequential decisions than those which |
|
placed our servicemembers in harm's way. After putting their |
|
lives on the line for their country, the very least they should |
|
be able to expect is that every decision affecting them will be |
|
taken with the greatest care and consideration, and always |
|
according to our Constitution. |
|
With that, Mr. Chairman, I yield back. |
|
Chairman Meeks. The gentlelady yields back. |
|
I now recognize Representative Brian Mast of Florida for 5 |
|
minutes. |
|
Mr. Mast. Thank you, Mr. Chairman. Let me start by saying I |
|
agree with almost everything that you said in your opening |
|
remarks about this piece of legislation. You |
|
[inaudible]. Our previous colleague just spoke about giving |
|
our servicemembers, of which I am a veteran, the assurance that |
|
we take the greatest care and consideration in our decisions. |
|
That has not been done. I would challenge anybody to prove |
|
me wrong. We have heard from a professor from Harvard, Yale, |
|
and NYU. Can any of the ten freshman that just joined Congress, |
|
that have been a part of no other hearing, I would yield my |
|
time to any of the ten freshman right now who can tell me that |
|
they spoke to a member of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, one of our |
|
military secretaries. Happy to yield to any one of our ten |
|
freshman that heard from one of them on AUMF. |
|
Mr. Meijer. Representative Mast, are you including those |
|
who spoke at the briefing we had on the CBC? |
|
Mr. Mast. Can you go ahead one more time? |
|
Mr. Meijer. Are you including the CBC briefing? I am not |
|
sure if we are able to reference that, given the setting that |
|
it was provided in. |
|
Mr. Mast. I think you can reference all you want. But this |
|
is what I am saying. Speak up. If your--you know, have our ten |
|
freshman heard--have our ten freshman spoken to our joint |
|
chiefs, our military secretaries? |
|
Mr. Jacobs. Mr. Mast, this is Representative Jacobs. I am a |
|
freshman. And I have talked to many members and leaders in our |
|
military about this issue. And I also have a master's degree in |
|
international security policy. |
|
Mr. Mast. Congratulations. I am glad to know that you spoke |
|
to them. |
|
Any of our other freshmen? It shows some diligence, that is |
|
great, which is what our committee has not done here. |
|
Chairman Meeks. Mr. Mast, would you yield? |
|
Mr. Mast. I do not know who asked, but---- |
|
Chairman Meeks. It is the chairman. |
|
Mr. Mast. I will in a moment to you, Mr. Chairman. I do |
|
want to give a little bit more time to some of our freshman. |
|
But I will bear in mind that you asked for time. So, yes, Mr. |
|
Chairman. Hold on a minute. |
|
Any of our other freshmen want to say that they heard on |
|
this? This is a big deal. We are aligned on this, but my point |
|
is simply in my opinion we make a joke out of this committee, |
|
which is very important to me. We spend a lot of time on this |
|
committee dealing with very serious issues to not hear from the |
|
correct people on such an important matter, especially an issue |
|
where there is common ground among us. But to not give it that |
|
due diligence is a very serious issue to me. |
|
Mr. Chairman, I see that I have 2 minutes here. I will |
|
certainly, you know, yield you a little bit of time. I am |
|
probably going to reclaim at some point, but go ahead, Mr. |
|
Chairman. |
|
Chairman Meeks. Yes. Mr. Mast, I just wanted to remind you |
|
that the witnesses that were before us were not just simply |
|
professors. They held high senior positions in the White House, |
|
in DoD, and DOJ. So, I just wanted to remind you of the |
|
credentials of the witnesses that were before us. They were not |
|
simple professors. |
|
I yield back to the gentleman. |
|
Mr. Mast. Yes, happy to yield to you, Mr. Chairman. I |
|
appreciate your comments. But, I would remind you of this: it |
|
was literally given to us in answer by the witnesses that they |
|
do not have the same access to information as us. Some of those |
|
witnesses literally said that to us as they were answering our |
|
questions: Representative, I do not have the same access to |
|
information as you do, but let me give you my opinion. |
|
That is a problem. That is a problem in diligence that we, |
|
as our colleague, your Democrat colleague just mentioned. We |
|
owe that to our men and women. This is common ground that we |
|
have here. Like I said, we agree on almost everything here. But |
|
let's give this the diligence that it deserves and call before |
|
the Foreign Affairs Committee, show the rest of Congress that |
|
this committee will be taking that seriously. Call before us |
|
the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, the Secretary of |
|
Defense. Take your pick of secretaries out there that we will |
|
have that conversation with them. Because it is owed to our |
|
servicemembers. |
|
And anybody again I would challenge you, tell me that |
|
having a conversation with one of them isn't at a substantially |
|
higher level than having a conversation with the individuals |
|
from Yale, Harvard, and NYU. Because it is, it deserves that |
|
diligence. |
|
I think I have made my point, Mr. Chairman. And I am making |
|
this point as somebody that loves our committee, that loves our |
|
military, that has lost over 67 friends in combat, killed in |
|
action, personal friends of mine. I take this with the utmost |
|
seriousness, and that is why I ask that this be taken with the |
|
utmost seriousness by our committee. |
|
I yield back. |
|
Chairman Meeks. The gentleman yields back. |
|
I now recognize Representative Andy Levin of Michigan for 5 |
|
minutes. I ask Mr. Levin if he would give me just 10 seconds, |
|
the opening 10 seconds. |
|
Mr. Levin. I yield to you such time as you may consume, Mr. |
|
Chairman. |
|
Chairman Meeks. Yes. I just want to remind everyone on the |
|
committee, and Mr. Mast, that we had a classified briefing on |
|
the use of force in Iraq that no one would have been able to |
|
talk about in the forum that we had our hearing. So, we had |
|
additional information about Iraq in a classified session. |
|
So, it was not taken lightly as to what we are doing today |
|
and why we are doing it. We had expert and classified materials |
|
to do it. |
|
I yield back to the gentleman. |
|
Mr. Levin. Thanks, Mr. Chairman. And thanks for your |
|
leadership on this issue. |
|
I strongly support this move. It is long overdue. I think |
|
Congress needs to reclaim our responsibility and, frankly, the |
|
courage to authorize force when it needs to be authorized. We |
|
ought to, as one of our witnesses said, we ought to put a |
|
sunset on every authorization. |
|
In my view, every person in our country who served for 2 |
|
years in this House ought to have to vote on whether we ought |
|
to continue authorizing force for a given reason. Here we are |
|
not talking about eliminating all AUMFs in this moment, we are |
|
talking about repealing the 2002 AUMF, which was for a very |
|
specific purpose. And it is not, it has been stretched beyond |
|
belief, it is not needed anymore. And it is not appropriate for |
|
us to just fail to do our duty, frankly. |
|
And, so, I appreciate the ranking member's comments very |
|
much. And I think he has a case to make about, you know, if |
|
perhaps in discussions of the 2001 AUMF he might say, well, we |
|
ought to negotiate something in its place. I think the |
|
Administration is interested in talking to us about, you know, |
|
what new authorization might be necessary. But this, that |
|
doesn't apply to this one. |
|
So, I think it is incumbent on us to do this. And we ought |
|
to have done it a long time ago. It doesn't need any further |
|
study. Everyone knows what it says. And this is a matter of |
|
basic our, really, our form of government that we are the |
|
branch that declares war, we are the branch that raises the |
|
funds for war, and then the President is the commander-in-chief |
|
to carry it out. |
|
And let's step up to the plate, clean this mess up, and |
|
decide precisely what offensive war powers the President needs |
|
and do that, and not leave these things hanging out there which |
|
are, as you said, Mr. Chairman, vulnerable to misuse. |
|
So, let's get this done. I appreciate your leadership on |
|
this and our colleague Barbara Lee's leadership on this, who I |
|
believe, Mr. Chairman, was a member of this committee long |
|
before I was here. And I yield back the balance of my time. |
|
Chairman Meeks. The gentleman yields back the balance of |
|
time. |
|
I now recognize Representative Scott Perry of Pennsylvania |
|
for 5 minutes. |
|
Mr. Perry. Thank you very much, Mr. Chairman. |
|
And I want to begin by associating myself with the comments |
|
from my very good friend Mr. Mast, who has sacrificed on behalf |
|
of this country things that any single, every single one of us |
|
can scarcely imagine. |
|
That having been said, I have listened very diligently to |
|
the conversation from beginning to end to this point. Democrat, |
|
Republican, conservative, liberal, anything in between, quite |
|
honestly I almost agree with every single bit of it. So, you |
|
know there is a ``but'' coming. |
|
This has been used by presidents of both parties. And |
|
whether they should have or shouldn't have is part of the |
|
discussion here. But I think that there has been for an issue |
|
so weighty--and the chairman knows that I am a fan, we are |
|
friends, and I appreciate him--but this is a weighty, weighty |
|
issue that I think deserves much more careful contemplation. |
|
And it is not about me just trying to slow down the train or |
|
anything like this. I have had an AUMF written, a replacement |
|
written for 6 years, Mr. Chairman. So, I agree that we should |
|
enforce and take back, claw back our Article I authority, just |
|
like every single one here. That is the purview of Congress. |
|
And so, we are in complete agreement there. |
|
I agree that it is outdated, which is why I wrote a |
|
replacement. So, we are in agreement there. |
|
I think where the disagreement for me comes is in process. |
|
I think that we need much more careful deliberation because in |
|
my mind, while we have servicemembers down range right now when |
|
we sit in the comfort or our office, or our kitchen, or our |
|
living rooms, or wherever we are, we are back at Fort Living |
|
Room, they are out on the wire. They are out over the wire. |
|
They are in contact. |
|
And we are going to send a message to the world today that |
|
we are just going to throw down our arms. All of us people in |
|
our nice shirts and, you know, sitting in comfort, we are just |
|
going to walk away and embolden the enemy that while the next |
|
time somebody attacks us, or something like that, we are going |
|
to have to discuss it. |
|
Ladies and gentlemen, when you are out there on the edge |
|
the people back in Washington, DC. are far, far away, and you |
|
have to deal with what is right in front of you right then at |
|
that moment. You have to make decisions. And anything that |
|
helps the enemy have a leg up on you is unacceptable. It is |
|
unacceptable to me. |
|
So, I would just say to me, while I agree that it needs to |
|
be repealed, but it also, it also at the same time must be |
|
replaced. And we haven't discussed that at all as far as what |
|
the tenets of that are. So, we are walking away. |
|
You know, it is like sitting on one side of the firing |
|
line, you at your cannon, the enemy's at theirs, and you |
|
decide, well, look, we are not being real effective here so I |
|
am just going to walk away and let them first rounds in on my |
|
side. |
|
I do not know who would do that. I do not know why we would |
|
do that. I do not know why we would do that. We are for repeal, |
|
but repeal must be followed immediately, or concomitantly, |
|
concurrently, with replacement so that we have the--there is a |
|
reason it was used. There is a reason it was used by presidents |
|
on both sides of the aisle. |
|
Now, we might disagree with that, but there is a rationale |
|
for that. And we haven't gotten to that. We haven't had that |
|
discussion. |
|
And so, I understand we want to work together with the |
|
majority here, and there is a lot that we agree on. But |
|
unilateral disarmament is provocative, it is dangerous in my |
|
opinion, it is irresponsible, and it is a disservice, in my |
|
opinion, having been very honored to wear the Nation's uniform |
|
and serve, and serve literally in Iraq as well, to those |
|
members, those United States citizens who are out there on the |
|
line, you know, for an idea, for an ideal which is represented |
|
in our flag and this piece of paper called the Constitution. |
|
And with that, Mr. Chairman, I know I am going to get to |
|
speak on my amendment, but I just, I just felt like I, I had to |
|
say that. |
|
And one just final thing to correct the record. It was in |
|
this very committee under my questioning that John Kerry |
|
admitted, as Secretary of State, that there were weapons of |
|
mass destruction in Iraq. He knows it. I know it. I was there. |
|
Anybody that was there knows it. I know it is the narrative, I |
|
know it is the rhetoric, but I get tired of hearing that. Might |
|
not have been what you thought it was, but for people that were |
|
there, they know what it was. |
|
And with that, Mr. Chairman, I yield back the balance. |
|
Chairman Meeks. The gentleman yields back the balance of |
|
his time. |
|
I now recognize Representative Sara Jacobs of California |
|
for 5 minutes. |
|
Ms. Jacobs. Well, thank you, Mr. Chair. I want to first |
|
thank you for making this repeal a priority and for bringing |
|
this legislation forward so early in this session. The |
|
legislation you have prioritized for this committee over the |
|
past 2 months will undoubtedly improve the lives of millions of |
|
Americans, our diplomats, and servicemembers, and people around |
|
the world. |
|
And I also want to recognize and thank Congresswoman |
|
Barbara Lee for authorizing this--for authoring this bill, and |
|
for her enduring commitment to a responsible and just American |
|
foreign policy, and reasserting Congress' role in it. |
|
I was in middle school when this authorization for the use |
|
of military force was approved. And today, as a Member of |
|
Congress, I will vote to repeal it. |
|
I emphasize this because my generation has grown up in the |
|
shadow of America's protracted wars. And San Diego, the |
|
community I am proud to represent, is home to servicemembers, |
|
veterans, and military families who understand better than most |
|
the human impact of our foreign policy and our decisions to go |
|
to war. To my constituents the issues of war and peace, of |
|
whether we send their loved ones into harm's way are kitchen |
|
table issues. And Congress has abrogated that responsibility |
|
for too long. |
|
I often wonder whether the Members of Congress who voted in |
|
favor of the 2002 AUMF had any idea of the impact that vote |
|
would have on a generation of Americans. But the reality is I |
|
may never know because many of them have long since retired. |
|
This AUMF outlasted even them. |
|
In fact, on this distinguished committee only six of our 51 |
|
members were in office in 2002. And as just one young American |
|
whose life was shaped by the decisions made by this body 19 |
|
years ago, I want to especially thank you, Mr. Chair, for being |
|
the last remaining member of this committee to have voted no. |
|
Today we have a chance to at last turn the page. This |
|
repeal is an important first step in reasserting Congress' |
|
rightful and primary role in authorizing war. |
|
And to my colleague Mr. Mast's concerns, I want to thank |
|
you for your service to this country. But it is not the |
|
military generals, nor the President, nor any professor's job |
|
to tell us what to do. The principle of civilian control of the |
|
military places ultimate authority over the U.S. armed services |
|
in the hands of civilian leadership. This decision is ours, and |
|
ours alone. And as we have heard from so many others, there is |
|
not a single operation that would be impacted by this decision. |
|
With that, I am proud to vote for this repeal. And I want |
|
to thank my colleagues and staff who have worked toward this |
|
day for years. Let this vote mark a new chapter in American |
|
foreign policy and in Congress' role in it. |
|
And with that, Mr. Chair, I yield back the remainder of my |
|
time. |
|
Chairman Meeks. The gentlelady yields back the remainder of |
|
her time. |
|
I now recognize Representative Darrell Issa of California |
|
for 5 minutes. |
|
Mr. Issa. Thank you, Mr. Chairman. Sorry for forgetting to |
|
unmute. |
|
I want to associate myself, surprisingly, with several of |
|
the earlier speakers. And as Congresswoman Jacobs said, there |
|
aren't too many of us who were here for that vote. And, Mr. |
|
Chairman, you and I were. |
|
I stand with those who want to see an end to open-ended use |
|
of military force. And I would like to see a sunset clause put |
|
in any future use of military force. |
|
Later today I will be offering an amendment that would |
|
modify this legislation to simply put a ending date not later |
|
than January 2023, with a requirement that the President extend |
|
by specific request for no more than 90 days at a time. I |
|
believe it is the middle ground that could cause all of us to |
|
realize that this, and every other outdated use of military |
|
force, should in fact be given a terminal date. And if a |
|
President wants to, and I believe this President wants a new |
|
use of military force authorized, then he can negotiate in good |
|
faith with both sides of the aisle between now and January of |
|
year after next. |
|
If we do that, I believe we can come to common ground. |
|
Having said that, I am not in a position to vote for an |
|
immediate elimination of this before the Administration has |
|
been able to weigh in on whether they would use this the way |
|
the previous Administration and the Obama Administration did. |
|
But, I look forward to each of these amendments. Hopefully, you |
|
will consider my amendment as an extremely friendly one, one |
|
that Congresswoman Lee and I could cause as a--could consider |
|
as a base for future use of military force so that we never |
|
again have a no sunset use of military force. |
|
And with that, Mr. Chairman, thank you, I will not use my |
|
whole 5 minutes, and I yield back. |
|
Chairman Meeks. The gentleman yields back. |
|
I now recognize Representative Spanberger of Virginia for 5 |
|
minutes. |
|
Ms. Spanberger. Thank you so much, Mr. Chairman. Thank you |
|
for bringing up Representative Barbara Lee's legislation to |
|
repeal the 2002 Iraq War AUMF. I appreciate Representative |
|
Lee's strong leadership on this issue. |
|
Last Congress I, like so many on the committee, voted with |
|
the bipartisan majority of the House to repeal the 2002 AUMF. |
|
In this Congress I am an original co-sponsor of this bipartisan |
|
legislation, and I am hopeful that it will pass out of |
|
committee today. |
|
Since coming to Congress I have been very clear on this |
|
topic: Congress, please, must take the steps to reassert |
|
congressional authority in decisions of war and peace. It is |
|
required by the Constitution, and it is fundamental to our |
|
ability to represent our constituents, particularly |
|
servicemembers we represent. |
|
I join with members of my own party and members across the |
|
aisle and across the political spectrum to introduce |
|
legislation and make the case to the American people, in |
|
interviews and joint op-eds, that there is not only an interest |
|
in Congress reclaiming our constitutional authority, but we |
|
have a recognition that we must finally take steps to do so. |
|
Repealing the outdated, inactive 2002 AUMF is a first step. |
|
And we heard that clearly from the witnesses who testified |
|
at our hearing this week. They affirmed that repealing the 2002 |
|
AUMF is a priority, a principal first step and, importantly, a |
|
step that would not impact ongoing military and |
|
counterterrorism operations which are authorized under the 2001 |
|
AUMF. |
|
But, repealing the 2002 would prevent our country from |
|
entering into another potentially protracted engagement without |
|
Congress having a voice. And for too long we have seen men and |
|
women fighting and dying under authorities voted on decades |
|
ago, a generation ago. And the American people, especially the |
|
American men and women in uniform, deserve to see us take a |
|
vote on these issues. |
|
Repealing the 2002 AUMF is not only a step that we need to |
|
take, but we must address Congress' ongoing challenges with the |
|
2001 AUMF. We must replace and update the 2001 AUMF in the |
|
future. It is an authorization that has been stretched beyond |
|
its original intent to contend with threats that were certainly |
|
not present at the time that it got a vote a generation ago. |
|
But, addressing the 2001 AUMF is not the question before us |
|
today. Repealing the 2002 outdated and unused AUMF is. And for |
|
those who say we should keep old authorizations on the books |
|
just in case we need them, I would remind them that that is not |
|
how it is supposed to work. |
|
If there is a new threat, then those decisions to initiate |
|
new actions should be deliberated and should involve Congress. |
|
And the President has authorities provided by the Constitution |
|
and by the War Powers Resolution. But no President should be |
|
able to reach for irrelevant authorities that are just left on |
|
the books to engage in military action. |
|
For those who are saying that we are moving too fast, I |
|
would like to remind them that this bill is bipartisan and has |
|
passed the House multiple times. And it is severely overdue. |
|
And let's remember that the 2002 AUMF was enacted by Congress |
|
prior to the 2003 invasion of Iraq that toppled the government |
|
of Saddam Hussein. And U.S. military deployments for related |
|
purposes ended back in 2011. |
|
I would also like to speak not only in support of |
|
Representative Lee's bill but in opposition to Mr. Perry's |
|
amendment that would tie the 2002 AUMF repeal to a replacement |
|
of the 2001. My colleague from Pennsylvania and I joined with |
|
our colleagues at the time, Justin Amash, Ken Buck, Jared |
|
Golden, Dean Phillips, and Chip Roy, in writing an op-ed on the |
|
16th of January 2020. And we wrote, ``To start, it is time to |
|
have a serious debate and vote on the repeal of the 2002 AUMF |
|
which authorized the use of force against Saddam Hussein's |
|
Government in Iraq. This authorization has fully outlived its |
|
purpose, given the death of Hussein, regime change, and the |
|
withdrawal of U.S. forces in 2011, regardless of how one views |
|
the merit of that withdrawal.'' |
|
``The 2002 authorization, as well as the lingering 1991 |
|
authorization, should be removed from the books,'' we wrote, |
|
``lest either be used to justify further military engagement |
|
beyond what Congress intended.'' |
|
And we continued and noted separately, and I quote, ``We |
|
must also foster an informed debate on a strategic alternative |
|
to the 2001 authorization.'' |
|
Yes, we need to keep working on reform to other AUMFs. We |
|
have to repeal the 1957 and the 1991 AUMFs that are still on |
|
the books. But Mr. Perry's amendment would hamper our ability |
|
to take a first step by requiring that progress and the repeal |
|
of the 2002 be tied to our ability to address the 2001 AUMF all |
|
at once. |
|
Moving Representative Lee's common sense, bipartisan piece |
|
of legislation is a first step, and it is one that we should |
|
take. I look forward to taking this action today. And if |
|
Congress is actually ready to engage, ready to reassert |
|
ourselves in these hard conversations, these decisions where |
|
for too long certainly many of our predecessors have shirked |
|
those responsibilities, then we can move forward in the future |
|
with replacing the 2001. |
|
But, today's vote is not about that. Today's vote is not |
|
about a particular president, a particular party, or the |
|
Administration, it is about reasserting the role of Congress in |
|
decisions of war and peace. And I urge my colleagues on both |
|
sides of the aisle to join me in voting to repeal the 2002 |
|
AUMF. And I look forward to future conversations about |
|
replacing the 2001 AUMF. |
|
Thank you, Mr. Chairman. I yield back. |
|
Chairman Meeks. The gentlelady's time has expired. |
|
I now recognize Representative Mark Green for 5 minutes. |
|
Mr. Green. Thank you, Mr. Chairman. And I wasn't planning |
|
on speaking on this today, but I have heard a lot of passion in |
|
the discussion, and I thought I would just share a little bit |
|
from my personal experience. |
|
Many people today have talked about this being a multi- |
|
generational war, folks in grade school, or wherever it was |
|
when the thing was written. I was actually in combat on this |
|
AUMF in Iraq. |
|
It is a multi-generational war because then my son just |
|
last year deployed to Syria under this AUMF. And the reason |
|
that I would implore my colleagues to let's replace, repeal and |
|
replace together, those forces that are there that may possibly |
|
need either somebody, some group changes its name or changes it |
|
location where it hides out, where it bases itself from, our |
|
enemy so to speak. We need the flexibility. |
|
And as I thought of my son being there in Syria during that |
|
time, I was glad to know that those authorizations were there. |
|
So, I am for replacing it. I am not for repealing without a |
|
replacement. And that comes not, you know, from anything other |
|
than just having been there myself, having taken on these |
|
terrorists, having looked them in the eye, and knowing that my |
|
son has done the very same thing as a young Army Ranger. |
|
So, that is my impassioned plea to the committee. |
|
Thank you, Mr. Chairman, and I yield. |
|
Chairman Meeks. The gentleman yields back. |
|
I now recognize Representative Gerry Connolly of Virginia |
|
for 5 minutes. |
|
Mr. Connolly. Thank you, Mr. Chairman. And thank you for |
|
having this markup and including maybe the most consequential |
|
issue any Congress ever faces, the issue of war and peace. |
|
Since World War II, Congress has, frankly, abrogated its |
|
responsibility under Article I of the Constitution. We have |
|
yielded to encroachment after encroachment, assertion of power |
|
and accretion of power to the executive branch that the |
|
Constitution never foresaw. And lives were lost because of |
|
that. |
|
It is time that Congress reasserted its Article I powers, |
|
explicit and imputed. |
|
The commander-in-chief role has expanded far beyond the |
|
imagination of any of the writers of the Constitution. When |
|
they wrote the Constitution, granted it was a different period |
|
of time, but they were deeply suspicious of too much power |
|
being vested in an executive. They had just, after all, |
|
successfully revolted against an absolute monarch, George III. |
|
They were not about to repeat that experience by imputing or |
|
even devolving powers for an all-powerful chief executive, |
|
especially in matters of war and peace. |
|
They envisioned in Article I the Congress playing the |
|
primary role and the chief executive essentially executing the |
|
direction of the Congress, where to deploy troops, how many |
|
troops to deploy, what engagements we might have, what |
|
hostilities we might be engaged in. |
|
Now, we live in a more complex world. Challenges require |
|
sometimes instant reaction. But in the case of both Iraq and |
|
Afghanistan, we have been involved in the two longest wars in |
|
our history. They began with an authorization of use of |
|
military force in response to a very specific set of |
|
circumstances. And, unfortunately, once again the executive has |
|
encroached on that authorization and used it to rationalize and |
|
justify many, many actions not envisioned by Congress just a |
|
dozen years ago. It is time to repeal the AUMF and, |
|
thoughtfully, to consider what and how we replace it. |
|
We cannot do that on the fly, but we most certainly can |
|
start by repealing an outdated and I think dangerous |
|
authorization, dangerous in its extended use, dangerous in the |
|
commitments and entanglements and military hostilities that we |
|
might be engaged in without any of it having been contemplated |
|
by the original Congress that authorized it in the first place. |
|
So, prudence dictates we take action. The American people |
|
want us to take this action. And it is in the process a very |
|
focused rebalancing of powers that have gotten way out of whack |
|
between the legislative and executive branches about the most |
|
significant decisions we ever make, those of war and peace. |
|
I support the motion with respect to the AUMF, and yield |
|
back. |
|
Chairman Meeks. The gentleman yields back. |
|
I now recognize Representative Andy Barr for 5 minutes. |
|
Mr. Barr. Thank you, Mr. Chairman. And I want to thank all |
|
my colleagues for all of the thoughtful comments and opinions |
|
offered today, and especially want to thank my colleagues who |
|
have either served the country before their service in Congress |
|
in uniform, or in other capacities. My colleague Representative |
|
Spanberger in her capacity and certainly Representative Jacobs |
|
in her service to the country, all my colleagues I really |
|
enjoyed listening to the thoughtful comments and the arguments |
|
that are being offered. |
|
But I have to rise today in opposition to H.R. 256 and in |
|
support of Mr. Perry's amendment. And I will offer a couple of |
|
thoughts for consideration to my colleagues about why. |
|
Certainly I cannot speak from the same position of |
|
authority on this as General Perry or Representatives Mast or |
|
Green having served in uniform in Iraq. And I also understand |
|
that the AUMF for both 2001 and 2002 are certainly arguably |
|
outdated, probably are outdated, and they need to be updated. |
|
Perhaps we need a consolidated single replacement for both. |
|
I also am well aware that the American people, including my |
|
constituents, are weary of protracted war and that we may need |
|
AUMF reform in general. I agree with Representative Connolly |
|
that we need to reassert our Article I powers. |
|
And, Mr. Chairman, you made a point at the outset that |
|
these were entirely different wars, the wars related to the one |
|
AUMF and the war, the Iraq War, the 2002 AUMF. They are |
|
different in some respects in that they are different types of |
|
enemies perhaps, but there is a connection. And the connection |
|
is that it is all the global war on terror. |
|
So, my view is that we need to be very clear about what we |
|
are doing today by repealing the 2002 AUMF, admittedly |
|
outdated, without a replacement at the same time. What we are |
|
doing is we are repealing or we are withdrawing the authority |
|
that we, as Congress, has given to the commander-in-chief to |
|
protect Americans against threats in and emanating from Iraq. |
|
We are voting to cutoff the President's power to protect |
|
Americans who are in harm's way without a replacement. |
|
I see this as a vote to disregard the terrorist threats |
|
that remain in Iraq such as the Shia threat; the Shia militia |
|
groups that we see active right now; the Iranian proxies; the |
|
remnants of Sunni radicals in Iraq, including ISIS; jihadist |
|
groups that are connected to ISIS. |
|
And so, you know, I understand that this is a protracted |
|
war, as Representative Jacobs pointed out, but these are |
|
protracted threats. The threats remain, and we still have |
|
servicemembers in harm's way. |
|
I do agree with Ranking Member McCaul when he says this |
|
sends a very bad signal. We have to remember what happened when |
|
President Obama totally disregarded the threat of the rise of |
|
ISIS. I think this is an analogous, wrong message that we send. |
|
I agree with my colleagues who support this bill that we |
|
need to repeal the 2002 AUMF. We just cannot do it without |
|
doing anything replacing it right now immediately because of |
|
the remaining threats. |
|
And maybe the command-in-chief has inherent executive |
|
power. I have heard several of my colleagues to act if we do |
|
face a problem here. I have heard several of my colleagues talk |
|
about how this bill would not interrupt or disrupt any ongoing |
|
operations, no ongoing operations would be impacted, that it |
|
wouldn't in any way compromise the ability of the commander-in- |
|
chief to act. But I have to say, I mean, if that is the case |
|
then why have an AUMF to begin with? It implies that the |
|
commander-in-chief can act without authorization. |
|
And I thought the whole point of this, the point of our |
|
hearing and the testimony of the professors the other day was |
|
that Congress needs to reassert itself in the authorization of |
|
use of military force, we shouldn't allow the commander-in- |
|
chief to act unilaterally. And in effect we are inviting the |
|
commander-in-chief to do so when our troops will be inevitably |
|
threatened without this AUMF in place. |
|
So, look, I agree with many of my colleagues in what they |
|
are saying here on both sides of this debate, but I would urge |
|
that we, that we take this repeal up with a replacement at the |
|
same time, and do our job under Article I. |
|
Let's do our job. Let's reassert our Article I authority in |
|
this context, but let's not invite these threats without giving |
|
the commander-in-chief the ability to act in defense of our |
|
brave men and women in harm's way. |
|
And I yield back. |
|
Chairman Meeks. The gentleman's time has expired. |
|
I now recognize Mr. Pfluger of Texas for 5 minutes. |
|
Mr. Pfluger. Mr. Chairman, thank you for holding this |
|
hearing. Ranking Member McCaul, thank you for the leadership. |
|
The efforts that have been taken I think are a good step in the |
|
right direction. As somebody who served in this area at the |
|
height of ISIS, and saw not just things that were happening in |
|
Iraq but also in Syria, which involved national States, non- |
|
nation States, and a tremendous amount of actors in the region, |
|
this is a very, very complicated issue. |
|
And I would also like to say that I very much appreciate on |
|
both sides of the aisle today the acknowledgment that the most |
|
important thing that anybody in Congress can do is make a |
|
decision whether or not to send our troops to war. And I |
|
couldn't agree more. And as somebody who has been sent into |
|
harm's way by both Democrat and Republican presidents, it is a |
|
very emotional thing. And I would like to thank everybody for |
|
their service, whether it was in the military or in other |
|
departments that have dealt with this. |
|
But I would like to ask the question: if it truly is the |
|
most important thing that we do in Congress, if that truly is a |
|
fact, then I would ask all of my colleagues on both sides of |
|
the aisle today, let's have the discussion because we owe it to |
|
those troops that are fighting right now. And then let's |
|
proceed to a dialog, and then we can end in debate. |
|
And let's give the time--the proportional amount of time-- |
|
required to this very important subject, to ask the Department |
|
of Defense at the very highest levels--and I appreciate, Mr. |
|
Chairman, the opportunity to have a classified briefing. |
|
I think we need more of those with each of the service |
|
chiefs and the joint chiefs and the combatant commanders, with |
|
the secretary of State and with other key leaders and |
|
principals who can guide us in the reform because it is a |
|
dynamic environment. |
|
As I served there, it changed in the course of a year, but |
|
every single day as a pilot, as somebody who was tasked with |
|
carrying out the orders of our President and of our government |
|
to keep not only ourselves safe, but to also make sure that |
|
every instrument of power that we had continued to keep the |
|
world safe, I would ask that we look at that dynamic |
|
environment and we take this into account and we do a good |
|
bipartisan job because security is not partisan. And I know |
|
everybody on this hearing appreciates that, and I appreciate |
|
listening and learning from each of you on this subject. |
|
We need to take some time to put thought into it, so that |
|
the authorizations appropriately meet the threat and that we |
|
understand what Iraq is going to look like with the actions |
|
that we take. |
|
And, Mr. Chairman, I would just implore everyone here to |
|
consider how important it is to send our troops into harm's |
|
way, and to give it everything we have, which means sitting as |
|
a bipartisan committee, in classified briefings together, |
|
without TV cameras, so that we can have that debate and we can |
|
come up with the solutions that we need. |
|
And, Mr. Chairman, with that, I yield back. |
|
Chairman Meeks. The gentleman yields back. |
|
I now recognize Representative Peter Meijer from Michigan |
|
for 5 minutes. |
|
Mr. Meijer. Thank you, Mr. Chairman. I wish to associate |
|
myself with the remarks of both yourself, Chairman Meeks, and |
|
also Ranking Member McCaul, in strong agreement and how |
|
positive it is that there is bipartisan support on this issue. |
|
As many have noted before, I think we share broadly a sense of |
|
where we need to go. We just are on different sides in terms of |
|
how to get there. |
|
I just want to clear something up. The 2002 AUMF has not |
|
been used in the sense of being the operative authorization for |
|
any military action undertaken in and around Iraq roughly since |
|
the time I left Iraq in 2011. If we had repealed this AUMF in |
|
2012, it would not have constrained American operations. It |
|
would not have hampered our ability to defend ourselves. |
|
The majority of the operations that have taken place since |
|
then, whether it was ISIS using the 2001 AUMF or some of the |
|
attacks--or some of the--I shouldn't say attacks--some of the |
|
operations we have seen more recently that have been predicated |
|
on the Article 2 self-defense provisions, while they may have |
|
tangentially referenced 2002 as a backstop, they were not |
|
solely predicated on that 2002 AUMF. |
|
So the idea that we would be left defenseless I find |
|
disingenuous, and that is exactly why we have Article 2 self- |
|
defense provisions, so we are well-equipped to defend |
|
ourselves. |
|
And I actually do not think this bill goes far enough. In |
|
addition to the outdated and irrelevant 2002 AUMF, we still |
|
have authorizations on the books, as my colleague Ms. |
|
Spanberger said, from the original Gulf War in 1991 and 1957 |
|
around some Middle East operations. |
|
In fact, I am proud to co-sponsor legislation with Ms. |
|
Spanberger, Mike Gallagher, Jared Golden, in order to do |
|
everything we can to not only repeal 1902 but also 1991 and |
|
1957. |
|
And a preemptive response to Mr. Mast's question, I have |
|
not asked the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, nor the |
|
secretary of defense, their thoughts on the 1991 or 1957 |
|
repeals for the simple fact that they are irrelevant to current |
|
operations. |
|
Perhaps not holding 6 months of hearings to check might be |
|
hamstringing our efforts to check Communist influence in The |
|
Levant or to liberate Kuwait, if it is re-invaded by Iraq. But |
|
if that happens, there is a very easy solution to those |
|
outlandish hypotheticals, and that is we pass a new AUMF or we |
|
can engage in Title 50 operations or we could find |
|
justification under Article 2 self-defense provisions. |
|
Or, frankly, we could probably find a way to finagle it |
|
into the 2001 AUMF, because in this hypothetical scenario there |
|
is just about no way that we haven't been able to find that |
|
Sunni terrorist nexus to justify operations. |
|
We have used it to justify going after groups that did not |
|
even exist on 9/11. We have used it to go after groups that |
|
have actively fought al-Qaeda. So we could probably figure out |
|
a way to shoehorn other threats in as well. But at the end of |
|
the day, it is the 2001 AUMF that has been the basis for our |
|
offensive operations in the Middle East and Central Asia. |
|
And I strongly agree and second all of the efforts of--or |
|
all of the comments on this committee talking about the need to |
|
reform it, and I think it should be reformed in a thoughtful, |
|
forward-looking way. But the 2002 AUMF, in comparison, is |
|
simply dead letter. |
|
And in response to the idea that by doing this we may be |
|
emboldening the enemy, I think we are fooling ourselves if we |
|
think evildoers are tenting their fingers, watching this |
|
hearing and seeing weakness. In fact, you know, not only do we |
|
not need the 2002 AUMF to drop a hellfire on Qasem Soleimani, |
|
but I think this whole conversation that we are having, the |
|
vibrancy of this discussion, shows the strength of our |
|
commitment to thinking in a thoughtful way. |
|
The passion in this debate I think is incredibly healthy. |
|
You know, it projects that we as a committee are stepping up, |
|
we are committed to stepping up, and that we are not stepping |
|
back. And I think the best way to do this is to discard these |
|
irrelevant AUMFs, so we can step forward and strengthen our |
|
Nation for that long term. |
|
Therefore, I will probably be voting to support this bill, |
|
Congresswoman Lee's bill to repeal the 2002 AUMF. |
|
And with that, Mr. Chairman, I yield back. |
|
Chairman Meeks. The gentleman yields back. |
|
Do any other members wish to speak on this measure? Hearing |
|
no further requests, let's move on to amendments. For what |
|
purpose does the representative from Pennsylvania, Mr. Perry, |
|
seek recognition? |
|
Mr. Perry. Thank you very much, Mr. Chairman. I have got an |
|
amendment at the desk. |
|
Chairman Meeks. The clerk shall distribute the amendment to |
|
your staff virtually. Let's pause briefly to give all members |
|
enough time to review the amendment. |
|
Has everyone received a copy of the amendment? The clerk |
|
will please report the amendment. |
|
Ms. Stiles. Perry Amendment Number 52, amend the bill, add |
|
the following, effective date. |
|
[The amendment offered by Mr. Perry follows:] |
|
|
|
[GRAPHIC(S) NOT AVAILABLE IN TIFF FORMAT] |
|
|
|
Chairman Meeks. Without objection, further reading of the |
|
amendment will be dispensed with, and a point of order is |
|
reserved. The representative from Pennsylvania, Mr. Perry, is |
|
recognized for 5 minutes in support of his amendment. |
|
Mr. Perry. Thank you very much again, Mr. Chairman. And |
|
like many of my colleagues, I was a little surprised to see a |
|
clean repeal of the 2002 AUMF on the schedule for today's |
|
markup. |
|
It seemed to me a bill of this magnitude, and the |
|
implication it can carry for U.S. strategy in the Middle East, |
|
would have required feedback from numerous key stakeholders in |
|
the security arena, including DoD, Department of State, et |
|
cetera. To unilaterally pursue this measure I think would be, |
|
as I said before, grossly irresponsible. |
|
It, therefore, begs asking if due diligence was undertaken |
|
to buffer the integrity of this proposal. Did the architects of |
|
this bill consult with the intelligence community in bringing |
|
this repeal before us today? Did they consult with the |
|
Department of Defense? Did they consult with the Department of |
|
State? |
|
I am not sure I have really any indication that any of that |
|
happened. And I guess it doesn't have to to bring a bill, but I |
|
think it speaks to what maybe is lacking. |
|
Who did the architects of the bill consult? All indicators |
|
point to the leftist wing of the--the leftist wing of the |
|
Democrat party, disappointed that the President chose to launch |
|
a strike in Syria last month. And let me just say, many of us |
|
were not critical of that. In the last administration, anytime |
|
President Trump lifted a finger everybody acted like World War |
|
III was going to start. |
|
Nobody likes exercising military authority. It is the last |
|
resort. But if it keeps America safe, at least I will tell you, |
|
I am for it whether it is President Trump or President Biden. |
|
These individuals I think are infuriated that the President |
|
chose to attack select targets in Syria, targets that could |
|
have been justified by the 2002 AUMF. The 2002 AUMF has |
|
provided the past three administrations with legal cover to |
|
pursue Iran-backed militias in Iraq and the wider region. |
|
You know, I know there is a border between Iran and Iraq, |
|
and I know they fought a war. But I will tell you this: when |
|
you are standing on it, it is hard to tell. You know, one grain |
|
of sand looks like the other grain of sand right next to it. |
|
To be clear, it needs to be replaced. There is no doubt. We |
|
agree on that. It seems like everybody on the committee agrees. |
|
It is outdated, and everyone here can see we are no longer |
|
trying to get rid of the Ba'athist regime in Iraq. |
|
That being said, I think it is foolish to risk doing away |
|
with the 2002 AUMF with no replacement. Some of the left want |
|
to get rid of this amendment because they want to |
|
disincentivize the administration from pursuing similar |
|
activities in the future. But it is clear that we should be |
|
able and willing to target Iran-backed militias, especially |
|
when they attack U.S. targets in the region. |
|
They are attacking--they have been attacking them almost, |
|
it seems like, my whole life, and they are attacking right now. |
|
This amendment would allow for the repeal of the 2002 AUMF, |
|
but in a responsible way that secures U.S. national security |
|
interests. It would provide new, specific statutory |
|
authorization for the use of military force against specified |
|
terrorist groups. In doing so, it would repeal the 2001 AUMF |
|
but not without denying the United States the ability to |
|
specifically target new and emerging threats since the 9/11 |
|
attacks, including the Islamic State. |
|
This amendment would secure war powers reform and place |
|
decisionmaking, including decisions regarding specific targets, |
|
squarely in the purview of Congress where it belongs. On that |
|
we all agree. |
|
Today we have the opportunity to put an end to years of |
|
debate on critical issues of U.S. national security, given |
|
everything at stake. And I know, look, I am sure it is going to |
|
get rammed through the committee, and it will probably get |
|
rammed through on the floor. And that is a shame because I |
|
think if we were a little--spent a little more time personally |
|
and were a little more thoughtful and deliberate about this, we |
|
could have overwhelming bipartisan support in the committee and |
|
on the floor. |
|
But, unfortunately, this is going to go I think the way of |
|
a lot of things where one side generally supports it and the |
|
other side doesn't. And it is not indicative of how most of us |
|
on this committee feel, and quite honestly, I do not think it |
|
is indicative of how most Americans feel. |
|
They want Congress to do its role. They do not want |
|
unilateral unrestricted powers vested in the executive branch. |
|
They want us to be thoughtful, but they do not want us to walk |
|
away from the responsibility we have to safeguard America for |
|
the sake of politics and scoring points. And, unfortunately, I |
|
feel a lot of--that that is what this is about. |
|
I agree with Abigail. I did sign the letter, and I agree |
|
with the assessment of the letter. But I never said we should |
|
walk away from our commitment, especially to troops in contact |
|
right now. I never said we should disarm unilaterally. |
|
Absolutely, like I said, I support repeal. I wrote an AUMF 6 |
|
years ago because I support repeal--repeal and replacement--not |
|
repeal, unilaterally disarm, and walk away. |
|
Thank you, Mr. Chairman, and I yield. |
|
Chairman Meeks. The gentleman's time has expired. |
|
I now recognize myself for 5 minutes. I oppose this |
|
amendment. The Perry amendment would keep the 2002 UMA--UMF-- |
|
AUMF, excuse me, getting tired--AUMF on the books until |
|
Congress provides new, specific statutory authorization for the |
|
use of military force against specified terrorist groups. |
|
The problem with that is, the 2002 AUMF does not authorize |
|
force against any specified terrorist groups. So the amendment |
|
will prevent Congress from repealing an authority that does not |
|
apply to terrorists until we enact a new authority that does |
|
apply to terrorist. |
|
That doesn't make any sense, especially because Congress |
|
authorized force against terrorist groups in a separate |
|
authority. It is called a 2001 AUMF. That is what authorizes |
|
force against certain terrorists. It is not in the 2002 AUMF. |
|
I know we have been urged to take up 2001 AUMF also. |
|
Believe me, I support doing so. But replacing the 2001 AUMF |
|
requires much more work, much of the work that you are talking |
|
about now, of which I am saying we will get done in a |
|
bipartisan manner. We will work with the 2001 AUMF, as most of |
|
us are saying needs to be updated. And we need to do that in a |
|
bipartisan manner and take our time and make sure we are doing |
|
it right because it is still needed. |
|
But replacing the--and the 2001 just isn't so--the bottom |
|
line is that the 2002 AUMF is not needed for any current |
|
operations. Can't protect us because it is not needed for any |
|
operations. |
|
Look, a repeal passed the House 2 years ago. There is no |
|
reason to wait now. And it was bipartisan. It was done in the |
|
NDAA. But guess what, folks? It should have been done in the |
|
Foreign Affairs Committee. It is our jurisdiction. We do not |
|
want to pass up the vote. I know many members on both the |
|
Foreign Affairs and the Armed Services. But it is the |
|
jurisdiction of the Armed Services to pass any AUMF. |
|
We need to do our job in this committee. So, clearly, our |
|
job is to be very clear about where Congress stands on the 2002 |
|
AUMF, unlike the 2001. Keeping the 2002 AUMF in place does not |
|
help the President fight terrorism. It just helps the executive |
|
branch avoid working with Congress. |
|
We need to be decisive about Congress' power to authorize |
|
force. The hardest vote that I have had to take in my 22 years |
|
in the U.S. Congress is whether or not I send our women and men |
|
into war. I do not want to punt that responsibility. I do not |
|
want to give it to the executive branch. I want it to be right |
|
here with Congress, and I want this committee to lead in that |
|
regard. And for that reason, I oppose Mr. Perry's amendment. |
|
Is there any further debate on the amendment? Hearing no |
|
further requests to speak, the question is on the amendment. We |
|
are going to take a vote by voice. All members, please unmute |
|
your microphones. |
|
All those in favor, say aye. |
|
All those opposed, say no. |
|
In the opinion of the chair, the noes have it, and the |
|
amendment is not agreed to. And without objection, the motion |
|
to---- |
|
Mr. Perry. Mr. Chairman, I request a recorded vote. |
|
Chairman Meeks [continuing]. Reconsider is laid upon the |
|
table. |
|
Mr. Perry. Mr. Chairman, I request a recorded vote. |
|
Chairman Meeks. A roll call vote is requested. Pursuant to |
|
committee Rule 4A(2), further proceedings on the amendment |
|
shall be postponed. |
|
Are there any other amendments? |
|
Mr. Issa. Mr. Chairman, this is Congressman Issa. I have an |
|
amendment at the desk. |
|
Chairman Meeks. The clerk shall distribute the amendment. |
|
Let's pause briefly to give all members time to review the |
|
amendment. |
|
Everyone has a copy of the amendment? The clerk will please |
|
report the amendment. |
|
Ms. Stiles. Issa Amendment Number 18, strike Section 1 and |
|
insert the following. Section 1---- |
|
[The Amendment offered by Mr. Issa follows:] |
|
|
|
[GRAPHIC(S) NOT AVAILABLE IN TIFF FORMAT] |
|
|
|
Chairman Meeks. Without objection, further reading of the |
|
amendment will be dispensed with. A point of order is reserved. |
|
The representative from California, Mr. Issa, is recognized for |
|
5 minutes in support of his amendment. |
|
Mr. Issa. Thank you, Mr. Chairman, and I will be brief. As |
|
I explained a little bit earlier, this would make two |
|
substantive changes to the existing elimination of the AUMF. |
|
One is it would move its |
|
[inaudible] no matter what to January 30, 2023. |
|
Second, it would require that the President of the United |
|
States, on an every-90-day basis, request with specificity a |
|
reason for extending or continuing it. I believe that the |
|
current administration would likely extend once or twice while |
|
we work together to fashion a new AUMF if they needed one. |
|
However, if they continue to use it every 90 days, they |
|
would have to come to the realization that less than 2 years |
|
from today that ability would disappear completely. I think |
|
this puts the administration in the right position to have to |
|
come to Congress, if they anticipate some portion of this |
|
legislation or this authorization continue to be used. |
|
If they truly do not believe that they will need it, then |
|
this would be almost moot because this would--90 days after |
|
enactment of the Act, the AUMF would be canceled, since the |
|
President would not have asked for a specific 90-day extension. |
|
I think this finds some middle ground between both sides |
|
where Ms. Lee would like to have this be upon enactment, but if |
|
we do not get an enactment--in the last Congress we did not-- |
|
that we get immediate enactment. If, on the other hand, we are |
|
willing to allow the administration the possibility of a short |
|
extension based on specific need, with the recognition that if |
|
they do not need it, then Congresswoman Lee's vision would |
|
happen just 90 days later and likely would allow for the Senate |
|
to enact this bill. |
|
So I fashioned this after listening to what I thought were |
|
the arguments over the last 2 years by both sides and believing |
|
that this legislation that I voted for in my first term in |
|
Congress truly does need to have a sunset certainty. And this |
|
would allow for us to get sunset certainty. |
|
And with that, Mr. Chairman, I would yield for whatever |
|
time you need. |
|
Chairman Meeks. The gentleman yields back. |
|
I now yield 5 minutes to myself. Let me first thank, as |
|
many of my colleagues, Barbara Lee for her great work for all |
|
of these years in putting this bill together in regards to the |
|
AUMF. |
|
And I respect Rep Issa's interest in some sense, but the |
|
problem is the 2002 AUMF doesn't need a sunset. It just needs |
|
to be repealed. It is not for anything else. It doesn't need a |
|
sunset. It needs to be repealed. It is our duty to consider and |
|
vote on authorizations to use military force. We simply cannot |
|
keep avoiding that responsibility. |
|
I repeat again, the 2002 AUMF is not needed for any current |
|
operations. That is what the 2001 AUMF is for. |
|
If the President needs authorization for a future |
|
operation, he should come to us in Congress, and we should |
|
consider an issue on its own merits. That is how it is supposed |
|
to work. The President can take defensive action without |
|
Congress, but if he wants to take offensive action, he needs to |
|
work with Congress. And we need to do our jobs and work with |
|
him. |
|
Letting the President just continue to extend the 2002 AUMF |
|
for any purposes he sees fit is exactly how Congress ended up |
|
on the sideline on issues of war and peace in the first place. |
|
I am cutting my remarks short there, because that is the |
|
reason I urge my colleagues to oppose this amendment. |
|
Do any other members wish to speak on this amendment? |
|
Hearing no further requests to speak, the question is on the |
|
amendment. We are going to take a vote by voice. All members, |
|
please unmute your microphones. |
|
All those in favor, say aye. |
|
All those opposed, no. |
|
In the opinion of the chair, the noes have it, and the |
|
amendment is not agreed to. And without objection, the motion |
|
to reconsider is laid upon the table. |
|
Mute me for a second. |
|
The committee will now resume consideration of the |
|
amendment to H.R. 2118, the other measure of which roll call |
|
votes were requested and postponed. The question is on the |
|
amendment designated number--what was that designation? 53. We |
|
are going to do 53, to H.R. 2118, Securing America From |
|
Epidemics Act. |
|
A recorded vote is ordered. All members, please make sure |
|
you are visible to the chair, and unmute your microphone when |
|
your name is called. As you cast your vote, please be sure to |
|
say your name for the record first, and then for your vote. For |
|
example, Representative Jones votes no. |
|
The clerk, will you please call the roll? |
|
Ms. Stiles. Representative Sherman. |
|
Mr. Sherman. This is a vote on final passage? |
|
Chairman Meeks. This is--yes, on the amendment to H.R. |
|
2118. |
|
Mr. Sherman. Oh. So this is a vote on the amendment offered |
|
by which member? |
|
Chairman Meeks. Perry. |
|
Mr. Sherman. Sherman votes no. |
|
Ms. Stiles. Representative Sherman votes no. |
|
Representative Sires. |
|
Mr. Sires. Sires votes no. |
|
Ms. Stiles. Representative Sires votes no. |
|
Representative Connolly. |
|
Mr. Connolly. Connolly votes no. |
|
Ms. Stiles. Representative Connolly votes no. |
|
Representative Deutch. |
|
Mr. Deutch. Deutch votes no. |
|
Ms. Stiles. Representative Deutch votes no. |
|
I do not see Representative Bass. |
|
Representative Keating. |
|
Chairman Meeks. Can somebody mute until your name is called |
|
by the clerk? |
|
Ms. Stiles. Representative Keating. |
|
Chairman Meeks. You have to unmute, Representative Keating. |
|
I see you, but I do not hear you. |
|
Ms. Stiles. I will come back to you. |
|
Representative Cicilline. |
|
Mr. Cicilline. Cicilline votes no. |
|
Ms. Stiles. Representative Cicilline votes no. |
|
Representative Bera. |
|
Mr. Bera. Representative Bera votes no. |
|
Ms. Stiles. Representative Bera votes no. |
|
Representative Castro. |
|
Mr. Castro. Castro votes no. |
|
Ms. Stiles. Representative Castro votes no. |
|
Representative Titus. |
|
Ms. Titus. Titus votes no. |
|
Ms. Stiles. Representative Titus votes no. |
|
I do not see Representative Lieu. Oh, there you are, sir. |
|
Representative Lieu. |
|
Mr. Lieu. How did the chair vote? |
|
Ms. Stiles. The chair has not voted, sir. It is Perry |
|
Amendment Number 53. |
|
Chairman Meeks. It is a vote on the Perry amendment. |
|
Mr. Lieu. No. |
|
Ms. Stiles. Representative Lieu votes no. |
|
Representative Wild. |
|
Ms. Wild. Wild votes no. |
|
Ms. Stiles. Representative Wild votes no. |
|
Representative Phillips. |
|
Mr. Phillips. Phillips votes no. |
|
Ms. Stiles. Representative Phillips votes no. |
|
I do not see Representative Omar. |
|
Representative Allred. |
|
Mr. Allred. Allred votes no. |
|
Ms. Stiles. Representative Allred votes no. |
|
Representative Levin. |
|
Mr. Levin. Levin votes no. |
|
Ms. Stiles. Representative Levin votes no. |
|
Representative Spanberger. |
|
|
|
Ms. Spanberger. Spanberger votes no. |
|
Ms. Stiles. Representative Spanberger votes no. |
|
Representative Houlahan. |
|
Ms. Houlahan. Houlahan votes no. |
|
Ms. Stiles. Representative Houlahan votes no. |
|
Representative Malinowski. |
|
Mr. Malinowski. Malinowski, no. And not because it is from |
|
Mr. Perry. |
|
Ms. Stiles. Representative Malinowski votes no. |
|
Representative Kim. |
|
Mr. Kim of New Jersey. No. |
|
Ms. Stiles. Representative Kim votes no. |
|
Representative Jacobs. |
|
Ms. Jacobs. Representative Jacobs votes no. |
|
Ms. Stiles. Representative Jacobs votes no. |
|
Representative Manning. |
|
Ms. Manning. Manning votes no. |
|
Ms. Stiles. Representative Manning votes no. |
|
Representative Costa. |
|
Mr. Costa. Costa votes no. |
|
Ms. Stiles. Representative Costa votes no. |
|
Representative Vargas. |
|
Mr. Vargas. Vargas, no. |
|
Ms. Stiles. Representative Vargas votes no. |
|
I do not see Representative Gonzalez. |
|
Representative Schneider. |
|
Mr. Schneider. Schneider votes no. |
|
Ms. Stiles. Representative Schneider votes no. |
|
Ranking Member McCaul. |
|
Mr. McCaul. McCaul votes aye. |
|
Ms. Stiles. Ranking Member McCaul votes aye. |
|
Representative Smith. |
|
Mr. Smith. Smith votes aye. |
|
Ms. Stiles. Representative Smith votes aye. |
|
Representative Chabot. |
|
Mr. Chabot. Chabot votes aye. |
|
Ms. Stiles. Representative Chabot votes aye. |
|
Representative Wilson. |
|
Mr. Wilson. Mr. Wilson votes aye. |
|
Ms. Stiles. Representative Wilson votes aye. |
|
Representative Perry. |
|
Mr. Perry. Even if it is Perry, Perry votes aye. |
|
Ms. Stiles. Representative Perry votes aye. |
|
Representative Issa. |
|
Mr. Issa. Aye. |
|
Ms. Stiles. Representative Issa votes aye. |
|
Representative Kinzinger. |
|
Mr. Kinzinger. Kinzinger, aye. |
|
Ms. Stiles. Representative Kinzinger votes aye. |
|
I do not see Representative Zeldin. |
|
|
|
Mr. Zeldin. Zeldin votes aye. |
|
Ms. Stiles. Oh. I am so sorry, sir. One more time? |
|
Mr. Zeldin. Zeldin votes aye. |
|
Ms. Stiles. Thank you. Representative Zeldin votes aye. |
|
Representative Wagner. |
|
Mrs. Wagner. Wagner votes aye. |
|
Ms. Stiles. Representative Wagner votes aye. |
|
Representative Mast. |
|
Mr. Mast. Representative Mast votes aye. |
|
Ms. Stiles. Representative Mast votes aye. |
|
Representative Fitzpatrick. |
|
Mr. Fitzpatrick. Fitzpatrick votes aye. |
|
Ms. Stiles. Representative Fitzpatrick votes aye. |
|
Representative Buck. |
|
Mr. Buck. Buck votes aye. |
|
Ms. Stiles. Representative Buck votes aye. |
|
Representative Burchett. |
|
Mr. Burchett. Burchett votes aye. |
|
Ms. Stiles. Representative Burchett votes aye. |
|
Representative Green. |
|
Mr. Green. Green votes aye. |
|
Ms. Stiles. Representative Green votes aye. |
|
Representative Barr. |
|
Mr. Barr. Barr, aye. |
|
Ms. Stiles. Representative Barr votes aye. |
|
I do not see Representative Steube. |
|
Representative Meuser. |
|
Mr. Meuser. Meuser votes aye. |
|
Ms. Stiles. Representative Meuser votes aye. |
|
I do not see Representative Tenney. |
|
Representative Pfluger. |
|
Mr. Pfluger. Pfluger votes aye. |
|
Ms. Stiles. Representative Pfluger votes aye. |
|
Representative Malliotakis. |
|
Ms. Malliotakis. Malliotakis votes yes. |
|
Ms. Stiles. Representative Malliotakis votes aye. |
|
Representative Meijer. |
|
Mr. Meijer. Meijer votes aye. |
|
Ms. Stiles. Representative Meijer votes aye. |
|
Representative Jackson. |
|
Mr. Jackson. Representative Jackson |
|
[inaudible]. |
|
Ms. Stiles. I am sorry. One more time, Representative |
|
Jackson? |
|
Mr. Jackson. Representative Jackson votes yes. |
|
Ms. Stiles. Representative Jackson votes aye. |
|
Representative Young Kim. |
|
Mrs. Kim of California. Representative Young Kim votes aye. |
|
Ms. Stiles. Representative Young Kim votes aye. |
|
I do not see Representative Salazar. |
|
And I am going to go back through, make sure I did not miss |
|
anyone here. |
|
First, I will start with Chair Meeks. |
|
Chairman Meeks. Chairman Meeks votes no. |
|
Ms. Stiles. Chair Meeks votes no. |
|
Mr. Keating. Mr. Chairman? |
|
Chairman Meeks. Yes. |
|
Mr. Keating. Representative Keating. Have I been recorded? |
|
Ms. Stiles. Representative Keating, I do not have a vote |
|
for you yet, sir. |
|
Mr. Keating. Keating votes no. |
|
Ms. Stiles. Representative Keating votes no. |
|
Chairman Meeks. Have all members been recorded? |
|
Ms. Stiles. One moment, please, sir. |
|
Chair Meeks, all members have been recorded. |
|
Chairman Meeks. The clerk will report the tally. |
|
Ms. Stiles. Chair Meeks, on that vote, we had 24 noes and |
|
21 ayes. |
|
Chairman Meeks. The amendment is not agreed to. |
|
Without objection, the motion to reconsider is laid upon |
|
the table. |
|
The question is to report H.R. 2118, Securing America From |
|
Epidemics Act, to the House with the recommendation that the |
|
bill do pass. We are going to take a vote by voice. All |
|
members, please unmute your microphones. |
|
All those in favor, say aye. |
|
All opposed, no. |
|
In the opinion of the chair, the ayes have it, and the |
|
motion to reconsider is laid upon the table. |
|
The question is on the amendment designated Number 52, the |
|
Perry Amendment Number 52, to H.R. 256, repeal the |
|
Authorization for Use of Military Force Against Iraq Resolution |
|
of 2002. |
|
A recorded vote is ordered. All members, make sure you are |
|
visible to the chair and unmute your microphones when your name |
|
is called. As you cast your vote, please be sure to say your |
|
name for the record first, and then your vote. For example, |
|
Representative Jones votes no. |
|
The clerk will call the roll. |
|
Ms. Stiles. Representative Sherman. |
|
Mr. Sherman. On the Perry amendment, Sherman votes no. |
|
Ms. Stiles. Representative Sherman votes no. |
|
Representative Sires. |
|
Mr. Sires. Sires votes no. |
|
Ms. Stiles. Representative Sires votes no. |
|
Representative Connolly. |
|
Mr. Connolly. Connolly votes no. |
|
Ms. Stiles. Representative Connolly votes no. |
|
Representative Deutch. |
|
Mr. Deutch. Deutch votes no. |
|
Ms. Stiles. Representative Deutch votes no. |
|
I do not see Representative Bass. |
|
Representative Keating. |
|
Mr. Keating. Keating votes no. People should mute, please. |
|
I could barely hear you. |
|
Ms. Stiles. Representative Keating votes no. |
|
Representative Cicilline. |
|
Mr. Cicilline. Representative Cicilline votes no. |
|
Ms. Stiles. Representative Cicilline votes no. |
|
Representative Bera. |
|
Mr. Bera. Representative Bera votes no. |
|
Ms. Stiles. Representative Bera votes no. |
|
Representative Castro. |
|
Mr. Castro. Castro votes no. |
|
Ms. Stiles. Representative Castro votes no. |
|
Representative Titus. |
|
Ms. Titus. Titus votes no. |
|
Ms. Stiles. Representative Titus votes no. |
|
Representative Lieu. |
|
Mr. Lieu. Lieu votes no. |
|
Ms. Stiles. Representative Lieu votes no. |
|
Representative Wild. |
|
Ms. Wild. Wild votes no. |
|
Ms. Stiles. Representative Wild votes no. |
|
Representative Phillips. |
|
Mr. Phillips. Phillips votes no. |
|
Ms. Stiles. Representative Phillips votes no. |
|
Representative Omar. I am sorry. I do not see |
|
Representative Omar here. All right. |
|
Representative Allred. |
|
Mr. Allred. Allred votes no. |
|
Ms. Stiles. Representative Allred votes no. |
|
Representative Levin. |
|
Mr. Levin. Levin votes no. |
|
Ms. Stiles. Representative Levin votes no. |
|
Representative Spanberger. |
|
Ms. Spanberger. Spanberger votes no. |
|
Ms. Stiles. Representative Spanberger votes no. |
|
Representative Houlahan. |
|
Ms. Houlahan. Houlahan votes no. |
|
Ms. Stiles. Representative Houlahan votes no. |
|
Representative Malinowski. |
|
Mr. Malinowski. Malinowski, no. |
|
Ms. Stiles. Representative Malinowski votes no. |
|
Representative Kim. |
|
Mr. Kim of New Jersey. No. |
|
Ms. Stiles. Representative Kim votes no. |
|
Representative Jacobs. Representative Jacobs, I see you on |
|
camera, ma'am. Would you like to vote? Representative Jacobs, |
|
would you like to cast your vote? |
|
Ms. Jacobs. Representative Jacobs votes no. |
|
Ms. Stiles. Representative Jacobs votes no. |
|
Representative Manning. |
|
Ms. Manning. Manning votes no. |
|
Ms. Stiles. Representative Manning votes no. |
|
Representative Costa. |
|
Mr. Costa. Representative Costa votes no. |
|
Ms. Stiles. Representative Costa votes no. |
|
Representative Vargas. |
|
Mr. Vargas. Vargas, no. |
|
Ms. Stiles. Representative Vargas votes no. |
|
I do not see Representative Gonzalez. |
|
Representative Schneider. |
|
Mr. Schneider. Schneider votes no. |
|
Ms. Stiles. Representative Schneider votes no. |
|
Ranking Member McCaul. |
|
Mr. McCaul. McCaul votes aye. |
|
Ms. Stiles. Ranking Member McCaul votes aye. |
|
Representative Smith. |
|
Mr. Smith. Smith votes aye. |
|
Ms. Stiles. Representative Smith votes aye. |
|
Representative Chabot. |
|
Mr. Chabot. Aye. Chabot is aye. |
|
Ms. Stiles. Representative Chabot votes aye. |
|
Representative Wilson. |
|
Mr. Wilson. Wilson votes aye on the Perry amendment. |
|
Ms. Stiles. Representative Wilson votes aye. |
|
Representative Perry. |
|
Mr. Perry. Perry votes aye. |
|
Ms. Stiles. Representative Perry votes aye. |
|
Representative Issa. Representative Issa, I see you on |
|
camera, sir. |
|
Mr. Issa. Representative Issa votes aye. |
|
Ms. Stiles. Representative Issa votes aye. |
|
Representative Kinzinger. |
|
Mr. Kinzinger. Kinzinger, aye. |
|
Ms. Stiles. Representative Kinzinger votes aye. |
|
Representative Zeldin. |
|
Mr. Zeldin. Zeldin votes aye. |
|
Ms. Stiles. Representative Zeldin votes aye. |
|
Representative Wagner. |
|
Mrs. Wagner. Wagner, aye. |
|
Ms. Stiles. Representative Wagner votes aye. |
|
Representative Mast. |
|
Mr. Mast. Representative Mast votes aye. |
|
Ms. Stiles. Representative Mast votes aye. |
|
Representative Fitzpatrick. |
|
Mr. Fitzpatrick. Fitzpatrick votes aye. |
|
Ms. Stiles. Representative Fitzpatrick votes aye. |
|
I do not see Representative Buck. |
|
Mr. Buck. Can you see me now? |
|
Ms. Stiles. Yes. Now I can, sir. Would you like to cast |
|
your vote? |
|
Mr. Buck. Buck votes no. |
|
Ms. Stiles. Representative Buck votes no. |
|
Representative Burchett. Representative Burchett, you are |
|
muted, sir. |
|
Mr. Burchett. Burchett votes aye. |
|
Ms. Stiles. Representative Burchett votes aye. |
|
Representative Green. |
|
Mr. Green. Green votes aye. |
|
Ms. Stiles. Representative Green votes aye. |
|
Representative Barr. |
|
Mr. Barr. Barr, aye. |
|
Ms. Stiles. Representative Barr votes aye. |
|
I do not see Representative Steube. |
|
Representative Meuser. |
|
Mr. Meuser. Meuser votes aye. |
|
Ms. Stiles. Representative Meuser votes aye. |
|
I do not see Representative Tenney. |
|
Representative Pfluger. |
|
Mr. Pfluger. Pfluger votes aye. |
|
Ms. Stiles. Representative Pfluger votes aye. |
|
Representative Malliotakis. |
|
Ms. Malliotakis. Malliotakis votes yes. |
|
Ms. Stiles. Representative Malliotakis votes aye. |
|
Representative Meijer. |
|
Mr. Meijer. Meijer votes no. |
|
Ms. Stiles. Representative Meijer votes no. |
|
I do not see Representative Jackson. |
|
Mr. Jackson. Representative Jackson. Can you see me? |
|
Ms. Stiles. Sorry, sir. I do now. Would you like to cast |
|
your vote? |
|
Mr. Jackson. Yes. Representative Jackson votes yes. |
|
Ms. Stiles. Representative Jackson votes aye. |
|
Representative Young Kim. |
|
Mrs. Kim of California. Representative Young Kim votes aye. |
|
Ms. Stiles. Representative Young Kim votes aye. |
|
I do not see Representative Salazar. |
|
Chair Meeks. |
|
Chairman Meeks. Chairman Meeks votes no. |
|
Ms. Stiles. Chair Meeks votes no. |
|
Chairman Meeks. Have all members been recorded? |
|
Mr. Gonzalez. No, sir. Congressman Gonzalez, Vincente |
|
Gonzalez, votes no. |
|
Ms. Stiles. Representative Gonzalez votes no. |
|
Chairman Meeks. Have all members been recorded? Any members |
|
wishing to change their vote? |
|
Will the clerk please report the tally? |
|
Ms. Stiles. Chair Meeks, on that vote, there were 27 noes |
|
and 19 ayes. |
|
Chairman Meeks. The amendment is not agreed to. |
|
The question is to report H.R. 256, to repeal the |
|
Authorization for Use of Military Force Against Iraq Resolution |
|
of 2002, to the House, with a recommendation that the bill do |
|
pass. |
|
We are going to take a vote by voice. All members, please |
|
unmute your microphones. |
|
All those in favor, say aye. |
|
All opposed, say no. |
|
In the opinion of the chair, the ayes have it, and the |
|
motion to reconsider is laid upon the table. |
|
Without objection, staff is authorized to make any |
|
technical and conforming changes. |
|
Pursuant to the House Rule---- |
|
Mr. McCaul. Mr. Chairman? |
|
Chairman Meeks. Mr. McCaul? |
|
Mr. McCaul. With that, I ask for a recorded vote. |
|
Chairman Meeks. The question to report H.R. 256 to repeat |
|
the Authorization for the Use of Military Force Against Iraq |
|
Resolution of 2002, with the recommendation that the bill be |
|
passed. All members, please turn on your video, so you are |
|
visible to the chair, and wait to unmute your microphone until |
|
your name is called, as you cast your vote. Please be sure to |
|
say your name for the recording--for the record first, and then |
|
for your vote. |
|
The clerk will please call the roll. |
|
Ms. Stiles. Representative Sherman. |
|
Mr. Sherman. Sherman votes aye. |
|
Ms. Stiles. Representative Sherman votes aye. |
|
Representative Sires. |
|
Mr. Sires. Sires votes yes. |
|
Ms. Stiles. Representative Sires votes aye. |
|
Representative Connolly. |
|
Mr. Connolly. Connolly votes aye. |
|
Ms. Stiles. Representative Connolly votes aye. |
|
Representative Deutch. |
|
Mr. Deutch. Deutch votes aye. |
|
Ms. Stiles. Representative Deutch votes aye. |
|
I do not see Representative Bass. |
|
Ms. Bass. I am here. I vote aye. |
|
Ms. Stiles. I am so sorry, ma'am. |
|
Ms. Bass. Can you see me? |
|
Ms. Stiles. Yes, ma'am. I do. Representative Bass votes |
|
aye. |
|
Representative Keating. |
|
Mr. Keating. Yes. |
|
Ms. Stiles. Representative Keating votes aye. |
|
Representative Cicilline. |
|
Mr. Cicilline. Representative Cicilline votes aye. |
|
Ms. Stiles. Representative Cicilline votes aye. |
|
Representative Bera. |
|
Mr. Bera. Representative Bera votes aye. |
|
Ms. Stiles. Representative Bera votes aye. |
|
Representative Castro. |
|
Mr. Castro. Castro votes aye. |
|
Ms. Stiles. Representative Castro votes aye. |
|
Representative Titus. |
|
Ms. Titus. Titus votes aye. |
|
Ms. Stiles. Representative Titus votes aye. |
|
Representative Lieu. |
|
Mr. Lieu. Lieu votes aye. |
|
Ms. Stiles. Representative Lieu votes aye. |
|
Representative Wild. |
|
Ms. Wild. Wild votes aye. |
|
Ms. Stiles. Representative Wild votes aye. |
|
Representative Phillips. |
|
Mr. Phillips. Phillips votes aye. |
|
Ms. Stiles. Representative Phillips votes aye. |
|
I do not see Representative Omar. |
|
Representative Allred. |
|
Mr. Allred. Allred votes aye. |
|
Ms. Stiles. Representative Allred votes aye. |
|
Representative Levin. |
|
Mr. Levin. Levin votes aye. |
|
Ms. Stiles. Representative Levin votes aye. |
|
Representative Spanberger. |
|
Ms. Spanberger. Spanberger votes aye. |
|
Ms. Stiles. Representative Spanberger votes aye. |
|
Representative Houlahan. |
|
Ms. Houlahan. Houlahan votes aye. |
|
Ms. Stiles. Representative Houlahan votes aye. |
|
Representative Malinowski. |
|
Mr. Malinowski. Malinowski, aye. |
|
Ms. Stiles. Representative Malinowski votes aye. |
|
Representative Andy Kim. |
|
Mr. Kim of New Jersey. Aye. |
|
Ms. Stiles. Representative Andy Kim votes aye. |
|
Representative Jacobs. |
|
Ms. Jacobs. Representative Jacobs votes aye. |
|
Ms. Stiles. Representative Jacobs votes aye. |
|
Representative Manning. |
|
Ms. Manning. Manning votes aye. |
|
Ms. Stiles. Representative Manning votes aye. |
|
Representative Costa. |
|
Mr. Costa. Representative Costa votes aye. |
|
Ms. Stiles. Representative Costa votes aye. |
|
Representative Vargas. |
|
Mr. Vargas. Vargas, aye. |
|
Ms. Stiles. Representative Vargas votes aye. |
|
Representative Gonzalez. |
|
Mr. Gonzalez. Gonzalez votes |
|
[inaudible]. |
|
Ms. Stiles. I am sorry, sir. One more time? |
|
Mr. Gonzalez. Gonzalez votes aye. |
|
Ms. Stiles. Representative Gonzalez votes aye. |
|
Representative Schneider. |
|
Mr. Schneider. Schneider votes aye. |
|
Ms. Stiles. Representative Schneider votes aye. |
|
Ranking Member McCaul. |
|
Mr. McCaul. McCaul votes no. |
|
Ms. Stiles. Ranking Member McCaul votes no. |
|
Representative Smith. |
|
Mr. Smith. Smith votes no. |
|
Ms. Stiles. Representative Smith votes no. |
|
Representative Chabot. |
|
Mr. Chabot. Chabot votes no. |
|
Ms. Stiles. Representative Chabot votes no. |
|
Representative Wilson. |
|
Mr. Wilson. Wilson votes no. |
|
Ms. Stiles. Representative Wilson votes no. |
|
Representative Perry. |
|
Mr. Perry. Perry is no. |
|
Ms. Stiles. Representative Perry votes no. |
|
Representative Issa. |
|
Mr. Issa. No. |
|
Ms. Stiles. Representative Issa votes no. |
|
Representative Kinzinger. |
|
Mr. Kinzinger. Kinzinger votes no. |
|
Ms. Stiles. Representative Kinzinger votes no. |
|
Representative Zeldin. |
|
Mr. Zeldin. Zeldin votes no. |
|
Ms. Stiles. Representative Zeldin votes no. |
|
Representative Wagner. |
|
Mrs. Wagner. Wagner votes no. |
|
Ms. Stiles. Representative Wagner votes no. |
|
Representative Mast. |
|
Mr. Mast. Representative Mast votes no. |
|
Ms. Stiles. Representative Mast votes no. |
|
Representative Fitzpatrick. |
|
Mr. Fitzpatrick. Fitzpatrick votes no. |
|
Ms. Stiles. Representative Fitzpatrick votes no. |
|
Representative Buck. |
|
Mr. Buck. Buck votes aye. |
|
Ms. Stiles. Representative Buck votes aye. |
|
Representative Burchett. |
|
Mr. Burchett. Burchett votes no. |
|
Ms. Stiles. Representative Burchett votes no. |
|
Representative Green. |
|
Mr. Green. Green votes no. |
|
Ms. Stiles. Representative Green votes no. |
|
Representative Barr. |
|
Mr. Barr. No. |
|
Ms. Stiles. Representative Barr votes no. |
|
I do not see Representative Steube. |
|
Representative Meuser. |
|
Mr. Meuser. Meuser votes no. |
|
Ms. Stiles. Representative Meuser votes no. |
|
I do not see Representative Tenney. |
|
Representative Pfluger. You are unmuted, sir. Or, I am |
|
sorry, you are muted. Representative Pfluger. Representative |
|
Pfluger, your audio is cutoff, sir. I am going to keep going, |
|
but we will ask after we are done. Okay. Let the record show |
|
that Representative Pfluger did a thumbs down sign. So |
|
Representative Pfluger votes no. |
|
Representative Malliotakis. |
|
Ms. Malliotakis. Malliotakis is no. |
|
Ms. Stiles. Representative Malliotakis votes no. |
|
Representative Meijer. |
|
Mr. Meijer. Meijer votes aye. |
|
Ms. Stiles. Representative Meijer votes aye. |
|
Representative Jackson. |
|
Mr. Jackson. Representative Jackson, no. |
|
Ms. Stiles. Representative Jackson votes no. |
|
Representative Young Kim. |
|
Mrs. Kim of California. Representative Young Kim votes no. |
|
Ms. Stiles. Representative Young Kim votes no. |
|
I do not see Representative Salazar. |
|
Chair Meeks. |
|
Chairman Meeks. Meeks votes aye. |
|
Ms. Stiles. Chair Meeks votes aye. |
|
Chairman Meeks. Have all members been recorded? Any members |
|
wishing to change their vote? |
|
The clerk will report the tally. The clerk will report the |
|
tally. |
|
Ms. Stiles. Chair Meeks, on that vote, there were 28 ayes |
|
and 19 noes. |
|
Chairman Meeks. The ayes have it. And without objection, |
|
the motion to reconsider is laid upon the table. The measure is |
|
ordered favorably reported. Without objection, staff is |
|
authorized to make any technical and conforming changes. |
|
Pursuant to House Rules, members will have 2 calendar days |
|
to file with the clerk of the committee supplemental, minority, |
|
additional, or dissenting views for inclusion in a report to |
|
the House on any of the bills ordered reported by the committee |
|
today. |
|
This concludes our business today, and I want to thank |
|
Ranking Member McCaul and members of both sides of the aisle |
|
for all of their contributions to--and assistance to today's |
|
markup. It is a markup that I think that we had some very good |
|
debate, and I look forward to continuing to work together to |
|
make America stronger. |
|
I now adjourn this markup. |
|
[Whereupon, at 7:02 p.m., the committee was adjourned.] |
|
|
|
APPENDIX |
|
|
|
[GRAPHIC(S) NOT AVAILABLE IN TIFF FORMAT] |
|
|
|
|
|
BILLS AND AMENDMENTS |
|
|
|
[GRAPHIC(S) NOT AVAILABLE IN TIFF FORMAT] |
|
|
|
VOTES |
|
|
|
[GRAPHIC(S) NOT AVAILABLE IN TIFF FORMAT] |
|
|
|
|
|
MARKUP SUMMARY |
|
|
|
[GRAPHIC(S) NOT AVAILABLE IN TIFF FORMAT] |
|
|
|
|
|
INFORMATION FOR THE RECORD |
|
|
|
[GRAPHIC(S) NOT AVAILABLE IN TIFF FORMAT] |
|
[ |
|
|
|
|
|
<all> |
|
</pre></body></html> |
|
|