diff --git "a/data/CHRG-117/CHRG-117hhrg43870.txt" "b/data/CHRG-117/CHRG-117hhrg43870.txt" new file mode 100644--- /dev/null +++ "b/data/CHRG-117/CHRG-117hhrg43870.txt" @@ -0,0 +1,3245 @@ + +
+[House Hearing, 117 Congress] +[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office] + + + RISING TO THE CHALLENGE: THE FUTURE + OF HIGHER EDUCATION POST COVID-19 + +======================================================================= + + HEARING + + BEFORE THE + + SUBCOMMITTEE ON + HIGHER EDUCATION AND + WORKFORCE INVESTMENT + + OF THE + + COMMITTEE ON EDUCATION AND LABOR + U.S. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES + + ONE HUNDRED SEVENTEENTH CONGRESS + + FIRST SESSION + + __________ + + HEARING HELD IN WASHINGTON, DC, MARCH 17, 2021 + + __________ + + Serial No. 117-2 + + __________ + + Printed for the use of the Committee on Education and Labor + +[GRAPHICS NOT AVAILABLE IN TIFF FORMAT] + + Available via: edlabor.house.gov or www.govinfo.gov + + __________ + + + U.S. GOVERNMENT PUBLISHING OFFICE +43-870 PDF WASHINGTON : 2022 + +----------------------------------------------------------------------------------- + + COMMITTEE ON EDUCATION AND LABOR + + ROBERT C. ``BOBBY'' SCOTT, Virginia, Chairman + +RAUL M. GRIJALVA, Arizona VIRGINIA FOXX, North Carolina, +JOE COURTNEY, Connecticut Ranking Member +GREGORIO KILILI CAMACHO SABLAN, JOE WILSON, South Carolina + Northern Mariana Islands GLENN THOMPSON, Pennsylvania +FREDERICA S. WILSON, Florida TIM WALBERG, Michigan +SUZANNE BONAMICI, Oregon GLENN GROTHMAN, Wisconsin +MARK TAKANO, California ELISE M. STEFANIK, New York +ALMA S. ADAMS, North Carolina RICK W. ALLEN, Georgia +MARK De SAULNIER, California JIM BANKS, Indiana +DONALD NORCROSS, New Jersey JAMES COMER, Kentucky +PRAMILA JAYAPAL, Washington RUSS FULCHER, Idaho +JOSEPH D. MORELLE, New York FRED KELLER, Pennsylvania +SUSAN WILD, Pennsylvania GREGORY F. MURPHY, North Carolina +LUCY Mc BATH, Georgia MARIANNETTE MILLER-MEEKS, Iowa +JAHANA HAYES, Connecticut BURGESS OWENS, Utah +ANDY LEVIN, Michigan BOB GOOD, Virginia +ILHAN OMAR, Minnesota LISA C. Mc CLAIN, Michigan +HALEY M. STEVENS, Michigan DIANA HARSHBARGER, Tennessee +TERESA LEGER FERNANDEZ, New Mexico MARY E. MILLER, Illinois +MONDAIRE JONES, New York VICTORIA SPARTZ, Indiana +KATHY E. MANNING, North Carolina SCOTT FITZGERALD, Wisconsin +FRANK J. MRVAN, Indiana MADISON CAWTHORN, North Carolina +JAMAAL BOWMAN, New York, Vice-Chair MICHELLE STEEL, California +MARK POCAN, Wisconsin Vacancy +JOAQUIN CASTRO, Texas Vacancy +MIKIE SHERRILL, New Jersey +JOHN A. YARMUTH, Kentucky +ADRIANO ESPAILLAT, New York +KWEISI MFUME, Maryland + + Veronique Pluviose, Staff Director + Cyrus Artz, Minority Staff Director + ------ + + SUBCOMMITTEE ON HIGHER EDUCATION AND WORKFORCE INVESTMENT + + FREDERICA S. WILSON, Florida, Chairwoman + +MARK TAKANO, California GREGORY F. MURPHY, North Carolina +PRAMILA JAYAPAL, Washington Ranking Member +ILHAN OMAR, Minnesota GLENN GROTHMAN, Wisconsin +TERESA LEGER FERNANDEZ, New Mexico ELISE M. STEFANIK, New York +MONDAIRE JONES, New York JIM BANKS, Indiana +KATHY E. MANNING, North Carolina JAMES COMER, Kentucky +JAMAAL BOWMAN, New York RUSS FULCHER, Idaho +MARK POCAN, Wisconsin MARIANNETTE MILLER-MEEKS, Iowa +JOAQUIN CASTRO, Texas BOB GOOD, Virginia +MIKIE SHERRILL, New Jersey LISA C. Mc CLAIN, Michigan +ARIANO ESPAILLAT, New York DIANA HARSHBARGER, Tennessee +RAUL M. GRIJALVA, Arizona VICTORIA SPARTZ, Indiana +JOE COURTNEY, Connecticut Vacancy +SUZANNE BONAMICI, Oregon VIRGINIA FOXX, North Carolina (ex +ROBERT C. ``BOBBY'' SCOTT, Virginia officio) + (ex officio) + + C O N T E N T S + + ---------- + Page + +Hearing held on March 17, 2021................................... 1 + +Statement of Members: + Wilson, Hon. Frederica S., Chairwoman, Subcommittee on + Education and Workforce Investment......................... 1 + Prepared statement of.................................... 5 + Murphy, Hon. Gregory F., Ranking Member, Subcommittee on + Education and Workforce Investment......................... 6 + Prepared statement of.................................... 8 + +Statement of Witnesses: + Burke, Lindsey M., Ph.D., Director, Center for Education + Policy, and Mark A. Kolokotrones Fellow in Education, The + Heritage Foundation, Washington, DC........................ 19 + Prepared statement of.................................... 22 + Oakley, Eloy Ortiz, Chancellor, California Community + Colleges, + Sacramento, CA............................................. 14 + Prepared statement of.................................... 17 + Thornton, Keith, Student, Florida International University, + Miami, FL.................................................. 11 + Prepared statement of.................................... 13 + Zibel, Daniel A., Vice President and Chief Counsel, National + Student Legal Defense Network, Washington, DC.............. 29 + Prepared statement of.................................... 31 + +Additional Submissions: + Bonamici, Hon. Suzanne, a Representative in Congress from the + State of Oregon: + Report dated May 19, 2020 from the Brookings Institution, + + ``Commercials for College? Advertising in Higher + Education''............................................ 86 + Jones, Hon. Mondaire, a Representative in Congress from the + State of New York: + Report dated October, 2020 from National Student Legal + Defense, ``Protection and the Unseen: Holding + Executives Personally Liable under the Higher Eduction + Act''.................................................. 109 + Leger Fernandez, Hon. Teresa, a Representative in Congress + from the State of New Mexico: + Article dated March 16, 2021 from the Santa Fe Reporter: + New Mexico College Students Face Food Insecurity''..... 106 + Link: GAO Report 19-95 dated December 21, 2018, ``FOOD + INSECURITY: Better Information Could Help Eligible + College + Students Access Federal Food Assistance Benefits''..... 108 + Omar, Hon. Ilhan, a Representative in Congress from the State + of + Minnesota: + Link: GAO Report 19-522 dated August 19, 2020, ``Higher + Education: More Information Could Help Student Parents + Access Additional Federal Student Aid''................ 106 + Questions submitted for the record by: + Banks, Hon. Jim, a Representative in Congress from the + State of Indiana....................................... 126 + Fulcher, Hon. Russ, a a Representative in Congress from + the State of Idaho..................................... 126 + Harshbarger, Hon. Diana, a a Representative in Congress + from the State of Tennessee............................ 126-7 + Sherrill, Hon. Mikie, a Representative in Congress from + the State of New Jersey + + + + Responses to questions submitted for the record by: + Dr. Burke................................................ 128 + Mr. Oakley............................................... 134 + Mr. Zibel................................................ 140 + + + RISING TO THE CHALLENGE: THE FUTURE OF HIGHER EDUCATION POST COVID-19 + + ---------- + + + Wednesday, March 17, 2021 + + House of Representatives, + Subcommittee on Education and + Workforce Investment, + Committee on Education and Labor, + Washington, DC. + The subcommittee met, pursuant to notice, at 1:03 p.m., via +Zoom, Hon. Frederica Wilson (Chairwoman of the subcommittee) +presiding. + Present: Representatives Wilson, Takano, Jayapal, Omar, +Leger Fernandez, Jones, Manning, Bowman, Pocan, Castro, +Sherrill, Courtney, Bonamici, Scott (ex officio), Murphy, +Grothman, Banks, Comer, Fulcher, Miller-Meeks, Good, McClain, +Harshbarger, Spartz, and Foxx (ex officio). + Staff present: Tylease Alli, Chief Clerk; Katie Berger, +Profession Staff; Ilana Brunner, General Counsel; Sheila +Havenner, Director of Information Technology; Eli Hovland, +Policy Associate; Ariel Jones, Policy Associate; Andre Lindsay, +Policy Associate; Max Moore, Staff Assistant; Mariah Mowbray, +Clerk/Special Assistant to the Staff Director; Kayla +Pennebecker, Staff Assistant; Veronique Pluviose, Staff +Director; Benjamin Sinoff, Director of Education Oversight; +Banyon Vassar, Deputy Director of Information Technology; +Claire Viall, Professional Staff; Cyrus Artz, Minority Staff +Director; Kelsey Avino , Minority Professional Staff Member; +Courtney Butcher, Minority Director of Member Services and +Coalitions; Amy Raaf Jones, Minority Director of Education and +Human Resources Policy; Dean Johnson, Minority Legislative +Assistant; Hannah Matesic, Minority Director of Operations; +Carlton Norwood, Minority Press Secretary; Alex Ricci, Minority +Professional Staff Member; Chance Russell, Minority Legislative +Assistant; and Mandy Schaumburg, Minority Chief Counsel and +Deputy Director of Education Policy. + Chairwoman Wilson. The Subcommittee on Education and +Workforce Investment will come to order. I believe we have a +quorum call. We have a Member who is being waived on the +committee. He's not a Member of the committee, but after each +of the Members speak he will be able to participate. + I want to welcome everyone. I note that a quorum is +present, so that's great. Everybody is on time and ready. The +subcommittee is meeting today to hear testimony on the future +of higher education post COVID-19. And you will notice that +some of the women are wearing white. This is a special day for +us, this particular suffrage day. + This is an entirely remote hearing. All microphones will be +kept muted as a general rule to avoid unnecessary background +noise. Members and witnesses they'll be responsible for +unmuting themselves when they are recognized to speak, or when +they wish to seek recognition. + I also ask that Members please identify themselves before +they speak, so call out your name before you speak. Members +should keep their cameras on while in the proceeding. Members +shall be considered present in the proceeding when they are +visible on camera and they shall be considered not present when +they are not visible on camera. + The only exception to this is if they are experiencing +technical difficulty and inform committee Staff of such +difficulty. If any Member experiences technical difficulties +during the hearing you should stay connected on the platform, +make sure that you are muted, and use your phone to immediately +call the committee's IT director, whose number was provided to +you in advance. + Should the Chair experience technical difficulty I'll need +to stop. If I have to step away to vote on the floor +Representative Mark Takano as a Member of this subcommittee, or +another Majority Member of the subcommittee, if he is not +available, is hereby authorized to assume the gavel in the +Chair's absence. + This is an entirely remote hearing and as such the +committee's hearing room is officially closed. Members who +choose to sit with their individual devices in the hearing room +must wear headphones to avoid feedback, echoes, and distortion +resulting from sitting in the same room. + Members are also expected to adhere to social distancing +and safe healthcare guidelines, including the use of masks, +hand sanitizers, and wiping down their areas before and after +their presence in the hearing room. + In order to ensure that the committee's five-minute rule is +adhered to, staff will be keeping track of time using the +committee's field timer. The field timer will appear in its own +thumbnail picture and will be named 001_timer. There will be no +one minute remaining warning. The field timer will sound its +audio alarm when time is up. + Members and witnesses are asked to wrap up promptly when +their time has expired. While a roll call is not necessary to +establish a quorum in official proceedings conducted remotely +or with remote participation, the committee has made it a +practice whenever there is an official proceeding with remote +participation for the Clerk to call the roll and help make +clear who is present at the start of the proceeding. + Members should say their name before announcing they are +present. This helps the Clerk, and also helps those watching +the platform and the live stream who may experience a few +seconds delay. + At this time I ask the Clerk to call the roll. + The Clerk. Ms. Wilson? + Chairwoman Wilson. Ms. Wilson is here. + The Clerk. Mr. Takano? + Mr. Takano. Present. + The Clerk. Ms. Jayapal? + [No response.] + The Clerk. Ms. Omar? + [No response.] + The Clerk. Ms. Leger Fernandez? + Ms. Leger Fernandez. Ms. Leger Fernandez is here. + The Clerk. Mr. Jones? + Mr. Jones. Here. + The Clerk. Ms. Manning? + Ms. Manning. Ms. Manning is here. + The Clerk. Mr. Bowman? + Mr. Bowman. Mr. Bowman is here. + The Clerk. Mr. Pocan? + Mr. Pocan. Mark Pocan's here. + The Clerk. Ms. Sherill? + [No response.] + The Clerk. Mr. Espaillat? + [No response.] + The Clerk. Mr. Grijalva? + [No response.] + The Clerk. Mr. Courtney? + Mr. Courtney. Courtney's here. + The Clerk. Ms. Bonamici? + Ms. Bonamici. Ms. Bonamici's present. + The Clerk. Mr. Murphy? + Mr. Murphy. Murphy is present. + The Clerk. Mr. Grothman? + [No response.] + The Clerk. Ms. Stefanik? + [No response.] + The Clerk. Mr. Banks? + [No response.] + The Clerk. Mr. Comer? + [No response.] + The Clerk. Mr. Fulcher? + Mr. Fulcher. Fulcher's here. + The Clerk. Ms. Miller-Meeks? + [No response.] + The Clerk. Mr. Good? + Mr. Good. Good is here. + The Clerk. Ms. McClain? + [No response.] + The Clerk. Ms. Harshbarger? + Ms. Harshbarger. I'm present. + The Clerk. Ms. Spartz? + [No response.] + The Clerk. Chairwoman Wilson that concludes the roll call. +I just wanted to add in here thank you Cheryl, thanks. + Ms. Foxx. Madam Chair, this is Virginia Foxx. I am present +also and I love your hat today. + Chairwoman Wilson. Thank you. Thank you so much. Pursuant +to Committee Rules agency opening statements are limited to the +Chair and the Ranking Member. This allows us to hear from our +witnesses sooner and provide Members with adequate time to ask +questions. + I recognize myself now for the purpose of making an opening +statement. But before I do that I just have to say that I want +to welcome especially Keith Thornton. Keith is one of your +witnesses and you will hear from him shortly, but he is a +member of the 5,000 Role Models of Excellence Projects that I +have been bragging about to all of you for years, especially to +you Representative Foxx. + Now I didn't want my time to start until now. Today we meet +to examine the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on higher +education and what we can do to expand access to quality higher +education. I want to start by reaffirming a well-established +fact that the foundation of our work that a college degree is +the surest pathway to financial security and a rewarding +career. + That is why as a Miami Dade County School Board Member, I +led the creation of the 5,000 Role Models of Excellence +Project, an in-school mentoring and dropout prevention program +that has helped prepare thousands of black boys for higher +education and adulthood. + Unfortunately, the COVID 19 pandemic has created new +barriers to postsecondary degrees. Campus closures and the +abrupt transition to online platforms saved lives. But we know +that remote instruction has also made it harder for students +across the country to access and complete college. + These consequences have not been felt evenly. As with every +other facet of our society, Americans who entered the pandemic +with fewer resources were disproportionately impacted by the +disruption to in person instruction. + Research indicates that achievement gaps between black and +white students are wider in online classes than traditional +settings. And on campus resources that underserved students +normally rely on, like computer labs and reliable high speed +internet, are restricted while campuses are closed. + Now, fewer students--particularly fewer low-income students +and students of color are pursuing a higher education. Social, +psychological, and economic hardships have also forced many +students to drop out during the pandemic. And now we know +students who discontinue their education are more likely to +default on student loans, and less likely to re-enroll which +lowers their chances of increased lifetime earnings. + Institutions are also facing unprecedented state and local +budget shortfalls which have already caused drastic funding +cuts and cost more than 300,000 higher education jobs. In +addition, decreased enrollment and campus closures are eroding +schools' revenue. + For example, undergraduate enrollment at community colleges +is down 10 percent compared to before the pandemic. Consider +that when the pandemic started many institutions were still +recovering from state budget cuts made during the Great +Recession. + To address these challenges, Congress secured urgent +funding for higher education by passing three major relief +packages: The Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security +Act, or CARES Act; the Coronavirus Response and Relief +Supplemental Appropriations Act, and just last week the +American Rescue Plan. + This combined investment of more than 75 billion dollars +has helped our higher education system avert an existential +crisis. This relief is helping institutions maintain basic +operations, keep staff on payroll, and prepare for reopening +safely, and it is helping students avoid hunger, homelessness, +and other hardships. + Importantly, these relief packages also secured critical +funding for state and local governments, supporting our +nation's public institutions, the workers they employ, and the +communities they support. + While this relief may have saved our higher education +system from financial calamity, justice demands that the +Federal Government do more, far more, to address the +longstanding disparities that have been exacerbated by the +pandemic. + For example, as institution access COVID-19 relief funding, +we must strengthen institutional oversight to prevent waste and +protect students from predatory for-profit schools. These +institutions have a well-documented record of using taxpayer +dollars to target vulnerable students during economic +downturns, leaving them with worthless degrees and unreasonable +loans. We cannot allow history to repeat itself. + Congress must also take bold action to lower the cost of +college. It's too expensive. This includes creating a federal +and state partnership that incentivizes states to reinvest in +their public institutions and offer free community college. And +it includes expanding Pell Grants, the cornerstone of federal +student aid, and so that fewer students that have to take +take--fewer will have to take out student loans. + As the Subcommittee has already established, this pandemic +is not only testing our students and institutions. It is also +testing Congress's commitment to ensuring that all students +have access to safe, affordable, and quality education. + Today I look forward to discussing what we must do to rise +to that challenge. I want to thank our witnesses again, for +being with us and I now yield to the Ranking Member Mr. Murphy +for his opening statement. Mr. Murphy, Representative Murphy. + [The statement of Chairwoman Wilson follows:] + + Statement of Hon. Frederica S. Wilson, Chairwoman, Subcommittee on + Education and Workforce Investment + + Today, we meet to examine the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on +higher education and what we can do to expand access to quality higher +education. + I want to start by reaffirming a well-established fact at the +foundation of our work-that a college degree is the surest pathway to +financial security and a rewarding career. + That is why, as a Miami-Dade County School Board Member, I led the +creation of the 5,000 Role Models of Excellence Project, an in-school +mentoring and drop-out prevention program that has helped prepare +thousands of black boys for higher education and adulthood. + Unfortunately, the COVID-19 pandemic has created new barriers to a +postsecondary degree. + Campus closures and the abrupt transition to online platforms saved +lives. But we know that remote instruction has also made it harder for +students across the country to access and complete college. + These consequences have not been felt evenly. As with every other +facet of our society, Americans who entered the pandemic with fewer +resources were disproportionately impacted by the disruption to in- +person instruction. + Research indicates that achievement gaps between Black and white +students are wider in online classes than traditional settings. And on- +campus resources that underserved students normally rely on, like +computer labs and reliable high-speed internet, are restricted while +campuses are closed. + Now, fewer students-particularly fewer low-income students and +students of color-are pursuing a higher education at all. + Social, psychological, and economic hardships have also forced many +students to drop out during the pandemic. And we know students who +discontinue their education are more likely to default on student loans +and less likely to re-enroll, which lowers their chances of increased +lifetime earnings. + Institutions are also facing unprecedented State and local budget +shortfalls, which have already caused drastic funding cuts and cost +more than 300,000 higher education jobs. In addition, decreased +enrollment and campus closures are eroding schools' revenue. For +example, undergraduate enrollment at community colleges is down 10 +percent compared to before the pandemic. Consider that, when the +pandemic started, many institutions were still recovering from State +budget cuts made during the Great Recession. + To address these challenges, Congress secured urgent funding for +higher education by passing three major relief packages: + +the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security Act, or + CARES Act, + + the Coronavirus Response and Relief Supplemental + Appropriations Act, and, just last week, + + the American Rescue Plan Act. + + This combined investment of more than $75 billion has helped our +higher education system avert an existential crisis. The relief is +helping institutions maintain basic operations, keep staff on payroll, +and prepare for reopening safely. And it is helping students avoid +hunger, homelessness, and other hardships. + Importantly, these relief packages also secured critical funding +for State and local governments, supporting our nation's public +institutions, the workers they employ, and the communities they +support. + While this relief may have saved our higher education system from +financial calamity, justice demands that the Federal Government do far +more to address the longstanding disparities that have been exacerbated +by the pandemic. + For example, as institutions access COVID-19 relief funding, we +must strengthen institutional oversight to prevent waste and protect +students from predatory for-profit schools. These institutions have a +well-documented record of using taxpayer dollars to target vulnerable +students during economic downturns, leaving them with worthless degrees +and unreasonable loans. We cannot allow history to repeat itself. + Congress must also take bold action to lower the cost of college. +This includes creating a Federal and State partnership that +incentivizes States to reinvest in their public institutions and offer +free community college. And it includes expanding Pell Grants, the +cornerstone of Federal student aid, so that fewer students have to take +out student loans. + As the subcommittee has already established, this pandemic is not +only testing our students and institutions. It is also testing +Congress's commitment to ensuring that all students have access to +safe, affordable, and quality education. + Today, I look forward to discussing what we must do to rise to that +challenge. + I want to thank our witnesses, again, for being with us and I now +yield to the Ranking Member, Mr. Murphy, for his opening Statement. + ______ + + Mr. Murphy. Thank you, Chairwoman Wilson. I appreciate the +opportunity. I love your hat also and I look forward to the +opportunity of working with you. I enjoyed our conversation the +other day. I think we have so much common ground to work on. I +could not agree with you more that individuals and minorities +and rural communities have been disproportionately affected by +this because of school closures, all of the more reason to get +our kids back in school. + America's higher education system has been in desperate +reform for years. The systems weaknesses were further +exacerbated by this pandemic. There are many pathways to +success besides the traditional Baccalaureate degree, and +institutions opposed to secondary education need to realize +that fact if they hope to have the students thrive in the +coming decades. + I could not also Chairwoman, agree with you more about the +affordability of colleges. They've gone unchecked without +reducing costs for years and I look forward to working with you +on that, nothing specific. We're not here today to discuss +whether higher education needs reform, as I think everybody on +this committee agrees so. + According to one analysis, four in ten Baccalaureate degree +recipients are underemployed in their first jobs after school, +and roughly 60 percent of students it takes at least six years +to complete their degree program. Certainly, these numbers are +not worth celebrating. + Now is not the time to expand on policies that have failed +us from government before. And while Congress does play a role +in improving all forms of postsecondary education, it should +not take the form of expensive government handouts that push +unworkable partisan priorities, and priorities that have shown +that government has led to the increased cost of education. + When COVID-19 placed heavy strains on our higher education +system Congress acted quickly to provide the necessary funding +for educational institutions to combat this once in a century, +and hopefully, once in a much longer-term pandemic. + Under President Trump, Congress allocated 35 billion +dollars, that's 35 with a B towards these efforts. Republicans +do not take spending taxpayer dollars lightly, which is why my +Republican colleagues voted against the Democrat led budget +reconciliation bill. + We wanted to help people, but unfortunately this was pushed +before unilateral with a large spending bill. But these +unprecedented levels of taxpayer money being funneled into +educational institutions, combined with valid concerns about +return on investment. It is imperative that Congress take a +close look at how the Department of Education and institutions +of higher learning spend hard earned taxpayer dollars, and +consider necessary structural reform to the Higher Education +Act to serve students better. + I'm disappointed that we're not going into this further, +and this hearing is seemingly having a lack of actual and +necessary oversight because I believe that is our purpose. We +have a responsibility to diligently and responsibly allocate +taxpayer dollars to those who truly need assistance. Too many +on this committee find it too easy to spend hard earned +taxpayer dollars without promising accountability. + I have no problem with us investing in our students, but we +have to hold institutions accountable. As a committee our +loyalty should be to all students, present and future. Any +conversations surrounding postsecondary education must aim to +reduce the cost of attendance, and boost graduation rates while +at the same time supporting students to pursue the type of +education that works for them. It is not a one size fits all. + And that means whether it be seeking a Baccalaureate +degree, or pursuing an equally valuable skill based +alternative, such as a career in technical education or +apprenticeships that lead to in demand good paying jobs. + Before the pandemic, there were over 7 million unfilled +jobs in the United States, in part due to a skills gap. With +employers in desperate need for qualified employees, now is the +time more than ever, to strengthen all learning opportunities +that provide students with skills and the necessary knowledge +to succeed in the workforce. + This type of strategy will not only benefit students, but +will boost our entire economy. Higher education is in a state +of emergency, but we cannot allow this to turn into an excuse +to nationalize the entire postsecondary education system. The +U.S. Constitution grants no authority over education to the +Federal Government. Education is not mentioned in the +Constitution and for a good reason. + The founders wanted most aspects of our lives to be managed +by those closest to them, either by State, or local or by +family, businesses, and other elements of society. Certainly, +they saw no role for the Federal Government in education. + Now if we're going to be involved in education, we ought to +expect specific financial and productive return on our +investment and not put students into oblivion of debt. +Committee Republicans are focused on supporting students and +completing affordable, postsecondary education that will +prepare them to enter the workforce with the skills that they +need for life long learning, and life long success. + We ought to work together, and I mean collaboration, to +give students access to educational options that will prepare +them to enter the workforce with the skills they need for that +lifelong success. Students need pathways, not partisanship, and +it is my hope and my expectation that this is a step in a +productive and a bipartisan direction. + Again thank you all for being here. I look forward to +discussing reforms for higher education that increase student +access without expensive government handouts, partisan +programs. And I want to thank the Chairwoman for a wonderful +discussion. As I said next week I look forward to working on +trying to do great things for our students in education, and +provide all students with a wonderful means of pathway to +success. Thank you, and I will yield back. + [The statement of Ranking Member Murphy follows:] + + Statement of Hon. Gregory F. Murphy, Ranking Member, Subcommittee on + Education and Workforce Investment + + Thank you, Madam Chair and thank you to all our witnesses for +joining us here today. + America's higher education system has been in desperate need of +reform for years. The system's weaknesses were further exacerbated by +the COVID-19 pandemic. There are many pathways to success besides the +traditional baccalaureate degree, and institutions of postsecondary +education need to realize this fact if they hope to help their students +thrive in the coming decades. + We are not here today to discuss whether higher education needs +reform, as both sides can agree that the system needs work. According +to one analysis, four in ten baccalaureate-degree recipients are +underemployed in their first jobs after school. Roughly 60 percent of +students complete their degree program within 6 years. Certainly, these +are not numbers worth celebrating. + Now is not the time to expand on failed, big government policies. +While Congress has a role to play in improving all forms of +postsecondary education, it should not take the form of expensive +government handouts that push unworkable, partisan priorities. + When COVID-19 placed heavy strains on our higher education system, +Congress acted quickly to provide the necessary funding for educational +institutions to combat this once-in-a-century pandemic. Under President +Trump, Congress allocated roughly $35 billion toward these efforts. +That is 35 billion with a b. + Republicans do not take spending taxpayers' dollars lightly, which +is why my Republican colleagues voted against the Democrats' budget +reconciliation bill. Unfortunately, Democrats unilaterally pushed ahead +with their large spending bill. + With these unprecedented levels of taxpayer money being funneled +into educational institutions, combined with valid concerns about +return on investment, it is imperative that Congress take a close look +at how the Department of Education and institutions of higher learning +spent hard-earned taxpayer dollars, and consider necessary structural +reforms to the Higher Education Act to serve students better. I am +disappointed that this hearing seems to have a glaring lack of actual +and necessary oversight. + We have a responsibility to diligently and responsibly allocate +taxpayer dollars to those who truly need assistance. Too many in this +Committee find it way too easy to spend hard-earned taxpayer dollars +without promising accountability. As a Committee, our loyalty should be +to all students, present and future. + Any conversation surrounding postsecondary education must aim to +reduce the cost of attendance and boost graduation rates, while also +supporting students to pursue the type of education that works for +them--whether it be seeking a baccalaureate degree or pursuing equally +valuable, skills-based alternatives, such as career and technical +education and apprenticeships, that lead to in-demand, good-paying +jobs. + Before the pandemic, there were over seven million unfilled jobs in +the U.S., in part due to a skills gap. With employers in desperate need +for qualified employees, now is the time to strengthen all learning +opportunities that provide students with the skills and knowledge +necessary to succeed in the work force. + This type of strategy will not only benefit students but will boost +our entire economy. + Higher education is in a State of emergency, but we cannot allow +this to turn into an excuse to nationalize the entire postsecondary +education sector. The U.S. Constitution grants no authority over +education to the Federal Government. Education is not mentioned in the +Constitution of the United States, and for good reason. The Founders +wanted most aspects of life managed by those who were closest to them, +either by State or local government or by families, businesses, and +other elements of civil society. Certainly, they saw no role for the +Federal Government in education. Now, if we are going to be involved in +education, we ought to expect a civic, financial, and productive return +on our investment. + Committee Republicans are focused on supporting students in +completing an affordable postsecondary education that will prepare them +to enter the work force with the skills they need for lifelong success. + We ought to work together--and I mean actual collaboration--to give +students access to education options that will prepare them to enter +the work force with the skills they need for lifelong success. Students +need pathways not partisanship. + It is my hope that this hearing is a step in the productive and +bipartisan direction. Again, thank you all for being here, and I look +forward to discussing reforms to higher education that increase student +success without expensive government handouts + ______ + + Chairwoman Wilson. Without objection, all of the Members +who wish to insert written statements into the record may do so +by submitting them to the Committee Clerk electronically in +Microsoft Word format by 5:00 p.m. on March 31, 2021. + I will now introduce the witnesses. Keith Thornton, Jr., is +a senior at Florida International University, FIU, where he's +majoring in recreation and sports management. Keith is a 5000 +Role Models of Excellence Project Wilson Scholar in an +educational talent search TRIO program alum, and he is a Pell +Grant recipient. + During the COVID-19 pandemic Keith received emergency +financial aid from both the CARES Act and CERTIA, which helped +him stay afloat. I am pleased to recognize my colleague +Representative Mark Takano to briefly introduce his constituent +who is appearing before us as a witness today. Representative +Mr. Takano, do I see you? + Mr. Takano. Thank you, Chair Wilson. It's my distinct honor +to welcome Chancellor Eloy Ortiz Oakley, who is Chancellor of +the California Community College system. Mr. Oakley was +appointed Chancellor for the California Community Colleges in +2016, and is best known throughout California and the Nation +for implementing innovative programs and policies that help +students succeed in college. + One of the most exciting developments in California Madam +Chair, is the use of alternatives to testing to actually place +students into college level classes and avoid unnecessary +remediation. This has huge implications for diversifying---- + [Audio difficulties] + Mr. Vassar. Chairwoman Wilson, I believe Mr. Takano's +connection became severed possibly. + Chairwoman Wilson. All right. So I'd like to welcome +Chancellor Eloy Ortiz Oakley as a witness. Welcome. It's a +pleasure to have you here today. The Chancellor was appointed +for the California Community Colleges in 2016, and is best +known throughout California and the Nation for implementing +innovative programs and policies that help students succeed in +college. + Prior to becoming Chancellor Mr. Oakley was a +Superintendent President of the Long Beach Community College +District. After serving in the U.S. Army, Chancellor Oakley +began his education at a community college, first enrolling at +Golden West College and then transferring to the University of +California Irvine where he received a bachelor of arts in +environmental analysis and design and master of business +administration. Welcome. + Our next witness is Daniel Zibel. He is the Vice President +and Chief Counsel and co-founder of the National Student Legal +Defense Network. Mr. Zibel is an expert on consumer protection +and higher education and leads Student Defense Network to +ensure that student loan borrowers can access the courts to +assert their rights against predatory loan servicing practices. + Prior to joining Student Defense, Dan served as a Deputy +Assistant General Counsel for post-secondary education at the +Department of Education where he served as the lead legal +counsel to the enforcement unit at Federal student aid, and on +the Obama administration's interagency task force on foreign +project education. + Mr. Zibel has a Bachelor of Arts in Political Science from +Haverford College and a law degree from the University of +Michigan Law School. Welcome. + Next Ms. Lindsey Burke is a Director of the Center for +Education Policy and Mark A. Kolokotrones Fellow in Education. +Lindsey Burke oversees the Heritage Foundation's research and +policy on issues pertaining to pre-school, K-12, and higher +education reform. + She also serves as a fellow with EdChoice, the Legacy +Foundation of Milton and Rose Friedman and is on the National +Advisory Board of Learn4Life, a network of public charter +schools. Is on the board of the Educational Freedom Institute, +and serves on the Board of Choice Media. + Ms. Burke holds a bachelor's degree in politics from +Hollins University, a master of teaching degree from the +University of Virginia, and a Ph.D. in education policy from +George Mason University. + These are my instructions to you as witnesses. We +appreciate your participation today, and we look forward to +your testimony. Let me remind you that we have read your +written statements, and they will appear in full in the hearing +record. Pursuant to Committee Rule 8(d) and committee practice, +each of you is asked to limit your oral presentation to a five- +minute summary of your written statement. + I also remind you as witnesses that pursuant to Title 18 of +the U.S. Code, Section 1001, it is illegal--illegal, to +knowingly and willfully falsify any statement, representation, +writing, document, or material fact presented to Congress or +otherwise conceal or cover up a material fact. + Before you begin your testimony please remember to unmute +your microphone. During your testimony staff will be keeping +track of time, and a timer will sound when time is up. Please +be attentive to the time. Wrap up when your time is over, and +re mute your microphone. + If any of you experience technical difficulties during your +testimony, or later in the hearing, you should stay connected +on the platform, but make sure you are muted, and use your +phone to immediately call the IT director whose number was +provided to you in advance. + We will let all of the witnesses make their presentations +before we move to Member questions. When answering a question +please remember to unmute your microphone. I will first +recognize my friend and son, Keith Thornton from Florida +International University. Keith. + + STATEMENT OF KEITH THORNTON, STUDENT, FLORIDA INTERNATIONAL + UNIVERSITY + + Mr. Thornton. Good afternoon everyone. Again my name is +Keith Thornton, Junior. Chairman Member Wilson, Ranking Member +Murphy, Members of the subcommittee, thank you for allowing me +to testify today. I value the opportunity to come before you on +behalf of all students across the Nation whose educations have +been disrupted by the pandemic and who have relied on emergency +aid to remain financially afloat and continue pursuing their +degree. + The fact that my experience during this challenging period +is in many ways not unique is a testament to the severity of +this crisis, and the ongoing need for Federal relief. + I am a senior at Florida International University studying +recreation and sports management. And since my freshman year, I +have benefited from the support of fellow students, teachers, +and positive campus environment. This support network has been +critical to helping me remain focused and weather many of the +challenges that have arisen in the past year. + I am also a proud graduate of the South Florida TRIO +Program, which enabled me to form long-lasting relationships +with instructors and students who have been a consistent source +of motivation. My program instructor, Ms. Tiffany Tyler, +regularly checks in with me and checks in with my family to see +if everything is going well with us. And there was a point in +time where I was even contemplating whether or not college was +for me. + And in the end I was able to go to my peers within the +program and they were encouraging me to continue pushing +through and now I'm in a position where I'm getting ready to +graduate. And Ms. Tiffany Tyler and others provided the +guidance and mentorship that I needed to not only continue my +education, but to also enjoy it. + In the past year, these supportive relationships have been +more important than ever. When the pandemic hit, my education +was disrupted. I had to suspend my internship, and I lost my +job. I had been working for about 2 months before the start of +the semester, which enabled me to move into an apartment and +forego taking out an additional loan and having to stay on +campus. + And losing that income was a heavy blow, so it was a great +relief when a few weeks later I received emergency funds from +FIU that were made available through the CARES Act. And this +aid helped me purchase school supplies and even keep up with +bills, whether it was rent, or anything concerning my car +because I had to travel. + Without that financial support, I would have been forced to +jeopardize my future by taking out more loans that I initially +hadn't planned for. The second round of aid that I received +through the Coronavirus Response and Relief Supplemental +Appropriations Act has similarly provided a lifeline that gave +me the opportunity to continue my studies without added +financial stress. + This has been critically important because even without +having to worry about replacing the income I lost when my job +ended, it has been challenging to remain focused on my studies. +And although I haven't allowed myself to become discouraged, or +to give up, COVID-19 has had a huge effect on my ability to +stay motivated. + I struggled with the transition of virtual learning and not +having the same support network around me. Without the presence +of my peers and teachers, I felt more alone and forced to rely +on my own strength. + Still, it has been my relationships with mentors, +counselors, and other students that have enabled me to remain +on track. And with their continued support, and thanks to the +emergency financial aid I received, I look forward to +graduating as soon as this summer. + I would like to thank the Members of this committee for +thinking of students across the United States who, like me, +suddenly had to take on unexpected costs when the pandemic hit, +and for delivering meaningful relief. + I would also urge you to continue to provide support for +students who are most in need. We represent the future, and I, +like many of my counterparts, want to use our degrees to make +an impact. Although Florida tuition rates have remained flat +for eight years, many students would benefit from an effort +double the Pell considering the significant financial burden +that exists on us and our families. + Receiving financial aid that removes some of this strain +helps put students in a position to thrive. And as its name +implies, FIU has an international focus, and I want to also +speak to the importance of ensuring that international students +have the same opportunities to succeed. + They are pursuing the same dreams and have in many cases +been equally impacted by the pandemic. So I want to thank you +for the opportunity to speak here today, and I look forward to +answering any questions you may have. Thank you. + [The prepared statement of Mr. Thornton follows:] + + Prepared Statement of Keith Thornton +[GRAPHICS NOT AVAILABLE IN TIFF FORMAT] + + + Chairwoman Wilson. Thank you so much Keith, thank you. We +will now hear from Chancellor Eloy Ortiz Oakley. Chancellor. + + STATEMENT OF CHANCELLOR ELOY ORTIZ OAKLEY, CHANCELLOR, + CALIFORNIA COMMUNITY COLLEGES + + Mr. Oakley. Well good afternoon everyone. And Chair Wilson, +Ranking Member Murphy, and Members of the subcommittee my name +is Eloy Ortiz Oakley. I'm a proud community college transfer +student, and I'm pleased to serve as the Chancellor of the +California Community Colleges. + I'm honored to speak to you today on the future of higher +education, as we look to the end finally, of the COVID-19 +pandemic. My remarks will focus on how our community colleges +are supporting our students to stay enrolled and complete their +studies, and how an effective partnership with Congress and the +Federal Government can lead to an equitable recovery by +investing in higher education and supporting the displaced +workers ravaged by this pandemic. + First, let me tell you a little bit about the California +Community Colleges. We are the largest and most diverse system +of higher education in the Nation with 116 colleges serving +more than 2 million students in urban, suburban, and rural +communities. They are the primary pathway to educational and +economic mobility for Californians, and we are proud to serve +the top 100 percent of our students. + Like much of the Nation 1 year ago today, our State went +into an immediate lockdown to ensure the health and safety of +our workers, families, and students. Our colleges are--I want +first commend Governor Gavin Newsom for his swift and decisive +action. Our colleges also acted decisively. + In a matter of weeks our faculty and college leaders +mobilized to convert tens of thousands of courses and programs +to an online, or remote modality. The support of Congress has +been critical to our system, and our students during this +critical moment. + The funds provided by the CARES Act were used, among other +things to help our diverse students purchase things like +laptops, Wi-Fi hotspots, and as emergency financial aid to +students who lost their jobs, in many cases were struggling to +find their next meal, or stave off eviction. + As we look to the future of higher education, the most +important task is to ensure that students can attend, and +afford the total cost of college. As no doubt you have heard, +community colleges have seen a sudden and alarming decrease in +enrollments since the start of the pandemic. + We believe that this is due to many factors, foremost among +them being that our students, they balance multiple +responsibilities. They are parents. Primary breadwinners. They +balance multiple jobs, and they share the same Wi-Fi with a +full household and are facing--many of them are facing +homelessness and other challenges. + The economic devastation brought by the COVID pandemic has +hit our lowest income students the hardest. We are appreciative +of the ongoing discussions about tuition free community college +and would note that California provides nearly three billion +dollars in student financial aid to waive tuition for low +income students attending community colleges and four-year +universities. + However, the cost of college goes beyond tuition. It +includes textbooks, supplies such as laptops, housing, food, +transportation and child care. We have used funds from the +stimulus legislation passed by Congress to provide direct +emergency one-time assistance to our most vulnerable students. + We need stable, permanent system of student financial aid +that acknowledges the true costs of attending college. This is +true not just in California, but across the country where the +movement to double the Federal Pell is gaining momentum, and we +are pleased to support this effort. + Our commitment is two-fold--increasing financial aid for +students to cover non-tuition related expenses, and scaling +those additional student supports that they need to complete +their education. Additionally, financial support is needed to +ensure equitable broad-band access for all. + High-speed internet is not a luxury. If anything, what we +have learned from this pandemic is that every American +household must have access to reliable high-speed broadband. I +also believe the community college training programs are +critical to preparing America's workforce, and ensuring an +equitable recovery. California's workforce programs, including +those funded by the Federal Perkins Career Technical Education +Program match, employers and high-skill, high-wage industries +with educated and qualified workers. + We strongly encourage these programs that provide new +pathways to secure employment and that pay a living wage. I +believe that we should place an emphasis of community college +programs that focus on the skills and competencies workers need +to get back into the workforce in a meaningful way. + We also further support oversight of the for-profit +industry. We thank Congress for including the America Rescue +Plan Act language that strengthens the 90/10 rule which helps +hold for-profits accountable for their reliance on Federal aid +dollars. + Finally, congressional action is needed to support our +undocumented students. This is not a partisan issue for us. +This is a moral and economic imperative. Undocumented students +are our future teachers, business owners, doctors and +entrepreneurs. We urge Congress to codify the deferred action +for childhood arrivals program. + I will close by adding that with regard to equity higher +education now is the time to double down on efforts to insure +that students have the supports they need to be successful, +whether they're in California, middle America, or the Atlantic +Coast. I'm proud to represent a State that leads with equity at +the center of everything we do. We cannot do this alone. +Ongoing Federal support, a partnership with the Biden +administration, leaders of this subcommittee and the entire +Congress are needed to make this happen. + I thank you for the time. I'm honored to be here today, and +I look forward to answering your questions. + [The prepared statement of Mr. Oakley follows:] + + Prepared statement of Eloy Ortiz Oakley +[GRAPHICS NOT AVAILABLE IN TIFF FORMAT] + + Chairwoman Wilson. Thank you so much. We will now hear from +Lindsey Burke. + +STATEMENT OF DR. LINDSEY M. BURKE, Ph.D., DIRECTOR, CENTER FOR +EDUCATION POLICY, AND MARK A. KOLOKOTRONES FELLOW IN EDUCATION, + THE HERITAGE FOUNDATION + + Ms. Burke. Good afternoon. My name is Lindsey Burke. I am a +Mark A. Kolokotrones Fellow in Education and the Director of +the Center for Education Policy at the Heritage Foundation. + Thank you Chairwoman Scott and Chairwoman Foxx and thank +you subcommittee Chairwoman Wilson and Ranking Member Murphy +for the opportunity to testify today. + COVID-19 has posed challenges to every aspect of education +in America from preschool through college. But it has also +presented opportunities to rethink whether the current higher +education system is serving students in the best way possible, +and whether there are opportunities for reform. + The congressional response to COVID-19 has now included +three major aid packages. As part of the CARES Act passed in +March 2020, higher education received 14 billion dollars in +additional Federal funding on top of the sector's standard +annual appropriations. + That was followed by another 22.7 billion dollars in new +funding as part of the December 2020 package. And then by the +most recent American Rescue Plan Act which will provide yet +another 40 billion to the higher education sector. In all, +colleges will have received an additional 76 billion dollars in +Federal spending over the past 12 months alone--a monumental +sum, nearly equivalent to the Department of Education's entire +annual discretionary budget. + Colleges should now take the opportunity to make sure that +that money is used responsibly. College boards of trustees and +regents need to direct their universities to tackle program +prioritization and reinvest funds in programs that advance +their core mission rather than continuing to engage in a +facilities and amenities arms race. + From 2001 to 2011 the number of non-teaching employees and +administrators increased 50 percent faster than teaching +faculty. At the same time the 6-year completion rate for +students pursuing a bachelor's degree stood at just 60 percent +in 2020. One-third of college graduates are underemployed, +working in jobs that do not require a bachelor's degree, and +business leaders also report that college courses do not +prepare graduates for the workforce, or provide them with the +practical or technical skills needed to be successful in their +careers. + Schools should focus resources on teaching and learning and +should evaluate productivity by assessing and prioritizing +academic programs that really reinforce their core mission and +prepare students for the workforce or further academic study. +The colleges and universities should also review facilities and +amenities expenditures and auxiliary services such as dining +services and student housing, janitorial services, and consider +outsourcing delivery and management of these functions which +are unrelated to their core mission as academic institutions. + And for its part Congress should not lose sight of the tens +of billions in new relief funding now that it has been +appropriated, and should make sure the Department of Education +is providing timely and useful oversight of how colleges are +spending that money. + Congress should also rescind the elastic clause of the HEA +prohibiting creditors from using their title for keeping +authority to impose onerous regulations on institutions. And +Federal policymakers should make space for private lending to +re-emerge and for innovative education financing options to +flourish by reducing Federal subsidies, including eliminating +the Federal PLUS Loan program, both the parent PLUS and grad +PLUS components. + And finally, Federal officials should allow colleges to +limit student borrowing. Currently, colleges are barred from +assessing a student's likelihood of repaying a loan based on +that student's course of study or borrowing history. Although +these factors can predict a student's ability to repay their +loans, colleges are not allowed to limit the amount students +can borrow. + Congress should amend the HEA to allow colleges to limit +borrowing, helping students to exit school with lower levels of +debt. Colleges and universities across the country do face +challenges associated with the COVID-19 pandemic, but so does +nearly every sector of society. Ever increasing Federal +spending and subsidies will not correct problems that have +plagued the higher education sector for decades, and which +predated the Coronavirus. + Congress should take this opportunity to pursue reforms +that will help colleges navigate the pandemic, while also +increasing their value proposition moving forward thank you. + [The prepared statement of Ms. Burke follows:] + + Prepared statement of Lindsey M. Burke +[GRAPHICS NOT AVAILABLE IN TIFF FORMAT] + + + Chairwoman Wilson. Thank you so much for your testimony. +Finally, we will hear from Daniel Zibel, welcome. + + STATEMENT OF MR. DANIEL A. ZIBEL, VICE PRESIDENT AND CHIEF + COUNSEL, NATIONAL STUDENT LEGAL DEFENSE NETWORK + + Mr. Zibel. Good afternoon Madam Chair Wilson, Ranking +Member Murphy and Members of the committee. I am the Vice +President and Chief Counsel of Student Defense. We use +litigation and advocacy to bring change for students on issues +of consumer protection and higher education. + I want to thank you for having me here today. As we all +know beyond the health effects and tragic losses of this past +year, the Coronavirus has fundamentally altered so many aspects +of American lives. With respect to higher education there have +been enormous impacts on students, perspective students, +families, study loan borrowers and repayment, recent graduates, +or those who left school without a credential at all. + COVID has exacerbated economic problems, including growing +disparities in a system of higher education that has benefited +so many, but has left so many others particularly in +communities of color with long-lasting, negative effects. + We are seeing signs now of an enrollment resurgence at for- +profit colleges. Although overall, post-secondary enrollment +decline in the fall of 2020, enrollment at for-profit colleges +actually increased. This trend is similar to what happened +around the Great Recession, and is worrisome in light of the +overwhelming evidence that students who attend for-profit +colleges have worse outcomes at large than their peers at +public or non-profit institutions. + Thankfully, the U.S. Department of Education has ample +tools to make sure that taxpayer funded student loans and +grants are not propping up predatory institutions while leaving +students with mountains of debt and worthless degrees. This +spring marks the 30th anniversary of a bipartisan report by the +Senate Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations, which offered +a scathing review of the department's oversight mechanisms and +led to bipartisan legislation that gave the department many of +the oversight tools it has today. + So at a time when the needs of students and borrowers are +so pressing, the department is not effectively using the tools +that Congress provided to ensure that colleges are best serving +students and taxpayers. For example, on the heels of the 1991 +report, Congress sought to ensure that taxpayers were protected +when colleges failed their students. + Because taxpayers can be on the hook for hundreds of +millions of dollars when an institution closes or defrauds its +students, Congress authorized the department to recover +financial losses, not only from institutions themselves, but +also from the individuals who own or run those institutions, +including board members and top executives. + Thirty years later the department has never brought an +action under this authority. The department has largely failed +to fine schools for consumer facing wrongs, or issue other +sanctions on predatory institutions. And there are far too many +examples of the department certifying a school for years of +access to student aid funds, even when a school is facing a +known risk of losing State authorization or accreditation, or +is under investigation by State and Federal law enforcement. + Enforcement is not just about punishing misconduct. It's +also about deterring future misconduct. But even in terms of +routine compliance, the department's program review process and +compliance audits are riddled with delays and inefficiencies. +An Inspector General's sample of 739 audits over an 11 year +period found more than 75 percent to have been conducted in a +failing or deficient manner. + I've noted additional failures in my written testimony. +This is not to say that Federal student aid is always missing +the mark. But given the enormous investment in student aid, and +the life-long effects that failures can have on students and +borrowers, the department must be doing a better job of +oversight. + I want to emphasize three additional high level +recommendations. First, FSA must embed student protections in +all of its decisions. Decisions should be about what is best +for students. FSA currently considers regulated entities to be +its partners. It's long past time for students and borrowers to +be the true borrowers of the department. + Second, the department must collaborate to reduce racial +disparities around student debt. FSA should work closely with +the department's Office for Civil Rights, and the Civil Rights +Division of Justice, each of which has unique authorities and +expertise. + Third, FSA should create a public service office to oversee +issues relating specifically to teachers, nurses and so many +others. There should be personnel dedicated to coordinating +with the VA on the GI bill, and with the Department of Defense +on post-secondary programs for military members and their +families. + And the department must improve the bipartisan public +service loan forgiveness program for all public servants. At +this time, the department can and must do better. Oversight is +one piece of a larger puzzle to ensure the promise of higher +education. I look forward to your questions. Thank you. + [The prepared statement of Mr. Zibel follows:] + + Prepared statement of Daniel A. Zibel +[GRAPHICS NOT AVAILABLE IN TIFF FORMAT] + + Chairwoman Wilson. Thank you so much. Thank you to all of +the witnesses, and again welcome. Under Committee Rule 9(a) we +will now question the witnesses under the five-minute rule. I +will be recognizing our subcommittee Members in seniority +order, again to ensure that the Members' five-minute rule is +adhered to, staff will be keeping track of time. + And the timer will sound when time has expired. Please be +attentive to the time. Wrap up when your time is over, and re- +mute your microphone. + As chairwoman I now recognize myself for five minutes. + This question goes to Mr. Thornton. Have you had unexpected +emergency expenses due to the pandemic? If so, how has +receiving emergency funding, including from the CARES Act +helped you meet your basic needs and ensure you could continue +in school? + And how do you think additional investments in student aid, +like restoring the purchasing power of the Pell Grant would +impact future generations of students? + Mr. Thornton. Yes. Thank you Congresswoman Wilson. So to +answer this question I would say that you know some unexpected +emergency expenses that have come up due to the pandemic are +kind of what I mentioned was me, unfortunately losing my job +last year, right before school started. + Initially I had the job for about 2 months, and it put me +in a position to where I was comfortable enough to be able to +go out and you know get my own apartment. And with the job not +needing as many employees, I was let go from that job, so it +put me in a position to where I had to pour a lot of funds from +my savings, and it put me in a position to where I wasn't +really as able to provide for myself in terms of rent, bills, +and even things concerning school, being able to purchase +materials. + So as far as receiving under the CARES Act, it literally +came just in time, and I was able to use that to not only take +care of myself as far as where I was staying, but even take +care of myself as far as school is concerned. And I purchased +the necessary materials in order to stay afloat and gain the +wisdom and knowledge that I needed in order to pass my courses. + So that was about later last year sometime, and to answer +your question as far as additional investments in student aid. +I think it would be awesome. I think it definitely would help +us as students a lot, just given the current situation still +with this pandemic, a lot of people are still losing their +jobs. + It's hard for people to even find jobs, and a lot of +people, students my age, we work so that we can take care of +ourselves as far as school is concerned. So when it comes to +receiving additional funds and additional aid it would help a +lot. I think it would definitely have a huge impact on us being +able to stay in school an also be able to provide for ourselves +concerning our school as well. + Chairwoman Wilson. Thank you so much. And with programs +like 5,000 Role Models of Excellence and the TRIO Program +alone, how has mentoring impacted your success? + Mr. Thornton. I would say it has greatly impacted my +success even now. As I mentioned with a shout out to Ms. +Tiffany Tyler who has played a huge role in me being here, in +my first year here, she made it memorable, honestly. + And for her to continue to remain in contact with me, +checking with me, see how I'm doing with school, checking in on +my GPA, making sure that I'm able to stay afloat, making sure +that I'm applying to scholarships. She honestly helped me out +so much. And for that I'm extremely grateful. + And even within the 5000 Role Models of Excellence Program +and TRIO Program, outside of mentors I was able to build +lasting relationships with young men like myself who were a +part of this program and who are still pursuing a degree. I +know that Ms. Congresswoman Wilson is familiar with a fine +young man named Preston Cooper who not only was my roommate he +was a 5,000 Role Models Alum. + And he's honestly been a great addition to my life and has +helped me grow in many different ways. So the 5,000 Role Model +in Excellence Program and TRIO Program has been tremendous and +has helped me to get where I am now, as I mentioned to +potentially be able to graduate by the end of this summer. + Chairwoman Wilson. Thank you. Mr. Zibel how can the +Department of Education better protect students, especially +those most vulnerable to abuse from predatory institutions? +Predatory actors. + Mr. Zibel. Sure thank you Chair Wilson. Look, under over +the last 4 years I think what we've seen is an administration +that eviscerated a lot of important protections for students. +Repealing the gainful employment rule, raising the bar for +Trump borrower defense, or you know the student loan discharges +for defrauded students, you know, to the point where I think +the last Congress even used the Congressional Review Act to try +to veto what Secretary DeVos had done, stalling a worse relief +for borrowers who had been defrauded by for-profit colleges. + So part of it is restoring a lot of those protections, but +that's not it. That can't be it. There has to be a cultural +shift at the department by putting student interest first. +Enforcement in this space can't just be about punishing actors, +and providing debt relief after the fact. We've got to be +deterring conduct in the first place. + Student lives are at stake, and the ramifications of this +are long-lasting, so we really need to be thinking about that +first. Our organization has been writing a lot about this over +the past six-months at 100daydocket.org about how to +reinvigorate enforcement and really put those culture +protections at the front end for all students and student loan +borrowers. + Chairwoman Wilson. Thank you so much. I now recognize Dr. +Foxx for her questioning. + Ms. Foxx. Thank you Madam Chairman I appreciate that. Dr. +Burke, well thanks to all of our witnesses today. Dr. Burke +thank you for your testimony. Congressional Democrats are +passionate about oversight of one particular sector of +postsecondary education, the for-profit sector. + The congressional Republicans care about all students at +all institutions. What are the current institutional +accountability metrics in the Higher Ed Act and how effective +are they? Were these effective during the pandemic, or were +they exposed as deficient? + Ms. Burke. Well thank you Chairwoman Foxx for that +question. The current accountability metrics in the Higher +Education Act, I would say are rather lacking if we just look +at outcomes. And that applies to all sectors. I think that it +is inaccurate to say that problems in higher education are +solely a function of career and technical education programs. + If we look at traditional four-year brick and mortar +colleges, unfortunately, we see low graduation rates across the +board. I mentioned that the 6-year graduation rate is 60 +percent earlier, that's something that should concern us all. + I really think that we should compare apples to apples when +we're thinking about accountability. If you look at certificate +programs across the country, just 45 percent of students who +pursue a certificate at a public college had earned it with 3 +years. That figure actually rises to 70 percent for students +who attend for-profit colleges. + And then there are other metrics as well. Andrew Gillan who +researches in this area found that there are 514 colleges, many +of these are community colleges at which the loan default rates +of their students actually exceed their graduation rates, and +he has called these red flag institutions. + And so you know we need accountability across the board. I +think one way to do that is to advertise the college scorecards +a little bit more. There's a lot of data already on that +college scorecard. There are data about almost everything that +you could want to know about college outcomes. + So I think it would help greatly if we had actors in the K- +12 space like school boards, across the country making public +schools aware of the information, making guidance counselors +aware so they can provide that information to students. +Sunlight really is the best disinfectant and that applies to +accountability within the higher education system as well. + And then of course I would argue that one of the +accountability measures that we really need is accountability +for taxpayer dollars because at the end of the day our taxpayer +funds, the Federal Government originates and services 90 +percent of all student loans now. + And a big step in the right direction, as I mentioned +earlier, would actually be to reduce some of these Federal +subsidies to make space for private lending to re-emerge. +Private lenders are in a better position to judge a student's +ability to repay those loans moving forward. + I think that is the single best accountability measure that +we could put into place. + Ms. Foxx. Well thank you very much. When I heard Mr. Zibel +say that it is inappropriate to punish actors, and we needed to +put students first, I thought that he was talking about the +Obama administration actually. + Do you have an idea on how we could align the incentives of +institutions, employers, taxpayers, and students. I think you +mentioned about accountability, but how do we align the +incentives so that it appears to be a win-win, instead of a +win-lose situation all the time? + Ms. Burke. Yes that's a great question Representative Foxx. +I think one of the best things to do is really a State level +effort, and we're already seeing this in 32 states across the +country, Virginia, Tennessee, Indiana, many others, where they +have policies in place that allocate their funds to public +colleges based on measures that include course completion, so I +think that's one good step in the right direction. + And then again at the end of the day, I think we can take a +cue from the market. We can look at what industry is doing when +it comes to really realigning incentives. There are many +industry upscaling programs that are out there at the moment. +You can look at companies, Amazon, FedEx, others that will +actually prepay tuition for programs that are aligned with +different career paths within their organization, and so I +think that's a way to really responsibly align incentives. + A lot of that though is going to have to happen at the +State level and within the private sector. + Ms. Foxx. Great. Well you gave me a good segue to talk +about fostering a culture of life-long learning, which we think +is very important. But the current system is not designed for +multiple access points and off ramps. What HEA reforms can +Congress make to create a system where short-term programs, +stackable credentials, and life-long learning is the new +normal? + Ms. Burke. Well that's such a critical question as well. +You know there are conversations right now around allowing +existing Title IV funds to go to shorter term programs to allow +students to direct those dollars to options that currently +aren't eligible under ETA rules because of those time +limitations. + I think that's a really good step in the right direction. +That would enable a lot of individuals, people who want to +switch careers, you know, mid-career to engage in earn and +learn opportunities, to take some of those Title IV funds to +shorter term program. + I think that's a step in the right direction. There are +larger reforms that need to take place like decoupling Federal +financing from accreditation to allow Title IV dollars to flow +in a more piecemeal way, but at least in the near-term, those +short-term options are a good step in the right direction. + Ms. Foxx. Thank you Madam Chairman. I yield back. + Chairwoman Wilson. Thank you, thank you. Mr. Takano of +California. Mr. Takano are you still connected? We'll come back +to Mr. Takano. Is Mr. Murphy on? Mr. Murphy of North Carolina, +Mr. Murphy. + Mr. Murphy. Thank you Chairwoman Wilson. First of all I +want to acknowledge Keith Thornton, Mr. Thornton, just to +congratulate you on the fine work that you've done, wish you +the best of success. You know that success comes from within, +and it doesn't come from being handed down to you, but it comes +from hard work and opportunity. + So I congratulate you on what you've done, and encourage +you to do even greater things and we look forward to hearing +back from you. So a question I'll direct, at least the first +one toward Dr. Burke, and thank you for joining us today. Your +testimony will help us as we seek to work with our Democratic +colleagues to reform the HEA, and the best interest of students +and taxpayer. + I want to stress the importance of bipartisanship. Last +year Congress came together in a bipartisan manner to pass two +COVID-19 relief packages that included specific, and very +significant funding for postsecondary education. + I have to say I was disappointed that this last funding +package went across party lines and was not a bipartisan +effort, and that's disappointing I think, not only for the +country, but for our Congress as whole. We need to really work +together. The American people are better served when we tackle +problems shoulder to shoulder. + In that vein Dr. Burke, let me ask your assessment of what +Congress did last year with the Higher Education Emergency +Relief Funding. Can you put into context the size and the scope +of the postsecondary educational bailout? You talked about +numbers before, but I'd like you to flush that out a little bit +more if you will. + Ms. Burke. Sure. Thank you Representative Murphy for that +question. I did talk about numbers before. I think it's +important to reiterate some of those numbers. The CARES Act was +14 billion for higher ed, and then we saw the second package in +December. That was another 21 billion dollars in that +supplemental proposal. + And then again colleges and universities will receive 40 +billion as a result of this third package. So in all we're +talking about over 70 billion dollars. As I said this is more +than the entire Department of Education's annual discretionary +budget, so it really is a breathtaking sum. + I did a back of the envelope calculation this morning, and +if you consider the fact that there are 20 million roughly, +college students across the country, and we have now expended +as a result of these three packages in additional Federal +spending, 76 billion. That's over $3,800.00 per college +student, just in these additional funds that have gone out the +door. + So it really is like I said, I don't think there's a better +word to describe it than a breathtaking sum of new Federal +spending. And of course this is not free money. This is +taxpayer money. It gets handed down to future generations. +Right now we have about 28 trillion dollars standing as our +national debt, that's $84,000.00 per person in the country, and +this will certainly add to that. + So it's a large amount of money and it really needs some +oversight. + Mr. Murphy. I think we're good. That's OK. All right. Well +thank you Dr. Burke. Let me just say you know I've been very +concerned about administrative bloat, and I wrote a couple +papers on that. I was on a board of trustees at a liberal arts +college, and I saw our administrative bloat compared to the 42 +other sister colleges skyrocket. + My fear is that Mr. Zibel would prefer we had more +committees, more Vice Presidents, more other bureaucracy. And +as we've seen the level, the amount of educational dollars that +actually go toward teaching students, does pale in comparison +to that of adding more administrative bloat. + I fear that now that we've poured all this massive money to +colleges, instead of actually learning to contract their +budgets and be responsible with them, will actually do just the +opposite. We'll see more lazy rivers. We'll see more quiet +oasis rooms. We'll veer from the mission of colleges to teach +students before. + So to your point they're going to now be flush with money. +And anybody flush with money is probably in some ways, I fear, +because of higher education and what they've done historically +in the last 10-15 years, they're going to spend it. And what +does that do in all of a sudden 5-10 years when that money runs +out, all of a sudden that is going to be demanded upon students +and giving them much, much, much higher access or risk, or +again being bankrupt when they have all these massive charges. + I wish you could speak to that just a little bit about +administrative bloat, and what this money is you think in your +prediction, is actually going to do to college costs in the +future. + Ms. Burke. Sure thank you for that question. Administrative +bloat is a huge problem. We have seen significant numbers and +staffing increases over the past decade. I mentioned earlier +that from 2001 to 2011 the number of non-teaching employees and +administrators increased 50 percent faster than teaching +faculty and colleges across the country. + If you just look at non-instructional staff at universities +around the country, that now accounts for more than half of +university payroll costs, the non-instructional staff. Just 40 +percent of full-time employees at non-doctoral colleges are +instructional staff. + And that figure actually drops to 28 percent at doctoral +granting institutions. So just 28 percent at those institutions +are teaching faculty. This is something that higher education +scholar Preston Cooper has looked into at length, and he has a +new report he just put out that I would commend where he +recently found that since 2003 only one-third of the increase +in colleges and universities core expenditures has gone to +spending on instruction, just one-third of the increase goes to +instruction. + As he says almost all of the rest has fed the growth of the +vast administrative apparatus of these institutions. And so as +I mentioned in my opening statement, colleges really have +needed a course correction for decades, and so you know, I +think too many unfortunately are now looking at these various +stimulus bills as a way to pay for general fiscal mal- +administration over the past two decades. + Mr. Murphy. Dr. Burke thank you. We're passed our time. I +appreciate it. Thank you Madam Chairman, I'll yield back. + Chairwoman Wilson. Thank you Mr. Murphy. Ms. Burke you are +consistently going over time. Please be mindful of the clock. +It's there for you. You seem not to hear me when I'm telling +you that you're over time, so you will have to keep up with the +time, and when you see that your time is up please stop. We +have a long hearing and a lot of people to ask questions. Thank +you. + Mr. Takano of California is our next person, speaker. + Mr. Takano. Thank you Madam Chair. My question is for +Chancellor Oakley. Chancellor could you comment briefly on how +California deals with the balance between the administrative +costs and instructional costs? + Mr. Oakley. Absolutely. And it's a pleasure to be here +again answering these questions. First of all in California you +know each State is different. But in California in the +community colleges, we actually have a law. It's called the 50 +Percent Law, which requires every community college to assign +at least 50 percent of all revenues that come from the State to +instruction, to the classroom. + Now because the nature of instruction has changed quite a +bit over time, we have had to expand that view because there +are a number of other efforts that go into supporting a +student, including a lot of the student supports that help a +student succeed. So that is the way we handle it, and I would +also say that because our system is comprised of 73 districts, +all have locally elected boards, as well as a State system +which has a board of Governors. + There is a sunlight all over our system. So these questions +are constantly addressed. They're constantly examined, and +we're constantly being held accountable for where our dollars +go. + Mr. Takano. Thank you Chancellor. You know this hearing is +in relationship to the American Rescue Plan and how it relates +to education. I know that in California your sister +institutions, the California State University System, and the +UC system, have suspended the use of standardized tests for the +purposes of admission. + Do you expect that--it's not really an experiment, it was +sort of forced by circumstances. Do you expect these sorts of +things, these sorts of practices to continue after the pandemic +is over? + Mr. Oakley. I do. In the California community colleges +we've eliminated the use of standardized placement exams. We +have found through our own research, as well as research that's +happened across the country, that the use of standardized exams +for the purpose of placing the students in courses has +significantly undermined low-income students from all +backgrounds. + The same is true for standardized admissions exams. And I +think the research is overwhelming now. I think places like the +University of California have seen the impact that it has had +on low-income students and communities of color. And I don't +believe that we are going back to those practices in the +future. + Mr. Takano. Is it not true that this innovation, this +experimentation of not using tests like the placement, or to +place students into college level classes at California +community colleges. But that was going on pre-pandemic is what +I understand, and can you tell us about what you've seen? Is +your faculty happy with this? Have the outcomes been good? Have +your transfer rates suffered because of the fact that you're +placing students by using instruments other than standardized +tests? + Mr. Oakley. So first of all the use of what we call +multiple measures placement. That is using multiple sources of +information to gain information about a student, and place them +in the course that they deserve to be in, and particularly in +math and English, has been going on for several years in +certain pilots across the system. + A couple of years ago this became law for the entire +system. Since then students who have been placed using this +method, without using standardized placement exams, students +are succeeding in numbers equal to those students that may have +begun in remedial courses before then. + We have seen significant, significant increases in the +number of students of color that have been placed in transfer +level English and math, and they are succeeding at the same +rates as other students. So we have seen nothing but success +thus far. It's given us a lot of good information about how we +continue to roll this system out. + And as we continue to rely less and less on remedial +courses, and rely more and more on providing students a pathway +to getting into courses that actually count toward their +educational goal. And that's been the biggest change. So many +courses were created in remedial education before this change +that were leading nowhere. + And so many students, particularly those of low income +status were getting trapped in these courses and not being able +to complete their educational goal. + Mr. Takano. Thank you Chancellor my time is up. It sounds +like innovation was already happening in California community +colleges, and it sounds like diversifying the higher education +is also being significantly impacted. Madam Chair I yield back. + Chairwoman Wilson. Thank you so much. We'll now here from +Mr. Grothman from Wisconsin. + Mr. Grothman. Yes. Thanks for having me. I have a question +here for Dr. Burke. You know over the weekend I ran into +another woman, age 51. She got laid off. She had a general +degree, had a good job, and now she can't find anything. And +she was just bemoaning the fact that when she was you know, +rather than go to a four-year college, why she wasn't a welder, +a medical tech of some nature, something or other. + And I still hear back home well-paid guidance counselors +advising everybody to go to college when again and again, I +find people not going to college lined up higher paid with less +student debt, and more job security. What can we do to +straighten out these reasonably well-paid guidance counselors +to give people a little bit better advice, not to mention, on +the other end of the thing. + When I talked to our employers in construction, in medical +field, and manufacturing. Well right now the only thing holding +us back from building more housing in Wisconsin, we can't find +anybody to do the work. What can we do to straighten out these +guidance counselors there Dr. Burke? It's a lot of people's +lives. + Ms. Burke. Thank you Representative Grothman. I completely +agree with you that we need to be communicating to students +that there are multiple pathways to climbing the ladder of +upward, economic mobility in America. And too often, the only +answer that we give them when asked what they should do, is +attend a traditional four-year college. + And that has not served many students well who would be +better situated in the future if they did something other than +go through that four-year brick and mortar route. And you know +to your point about construction workers and mechanics, +electricians, waitresses, you know, all of these individuals +end up bearing the cost of Federal bailouts, and ever- +increasing Federal subsidies in the higher education sector. + I think it's always important to bear in mind that still +today two-thirds of Americans do not hold bachelors degrees, +and it is that two-thirds of Americans who also have to pick-up +the cost for ever-increasing Federal spending. + Mr. Grothman. OK. I'll give you a general question. You +know again I hear talking to my trade unions or tech schools +and people, you know, going back, getting a skill, maybe in +their early 30's, after they already got a college degree in +their early 20's. + Percentage-wise Doctor Burke, I have no idea what +percentage of people going to a four-year college would be +better off not going to one today in your opinion. + Ms. Burke. Well it's hard to say, and it depends on how you +quantify better off. You know even an individual who might not +see a massive increase in earnings after having graduated, +might still say that the experience was worthwhile for them. + People go to college for a lot of different reasons. But +one thing we do know is there are an awful lot of students who +leave without earning that paper credential that they had so +fought to get. So many students right now are leaving without +graduating, and I mentioned 60 percent, 6 year college +graduation rate. And really the worst position you can be in is +having gone to two or three or three and a half years of +undergrad work, taken out those loans and not graduated with +that paper credential. + And unfortunately, we do see that in many cases. So I think +that for those individuals you could make the case that another +path would have been much more worthwhile, but it is hard to +quantify. + Mr. Grothman. Well, OK I know there's certain authors who +take a stab at it, but I'm going to come back to the woman I +talked to over the weekend. You know I frequently make the +pitch for young people to get a skill, rather than college, and +that you're going to graduate with less debt, and frequently +make more money immediately. + One thing I don't think is taken into account is if you do +wind up with some middle low management thing, and you're laid +off when you're 50 or 55, in our society frequently you're +almost unemployable. Whereas if you have a skill, you can keep +working until you're 60 or 70 or 80 if you want to. Could you +comment on the benefit of having a skill, a specific skill set +in manufacturing, med, tech, whatever, as opposed to a general +degree on people who get laid off when they're over 40? + Ms. Burke. Sure. Well what we do know, and I can't give you +specific numbers on the skill-based side. But what we do know +is that there are a large proportion of students who are +leaving undergraduate work, and entering jobs that do not +require a college degree. And so this high level of what we +refer to as underemployment is a real problem. + And I think does suggest that many of those students would +have been better served pursuing options that are skills-based +in nature. + Mr. Grothman. Well thank you Dr. Burke. I appreciate what +you're saying, and I hope you continue to educate young people +around the country to get a second opinion from their guidance +counselors, who are frequently well-paid and giving bad advice +for their pay. Thank you. + Chairwoman Wilson. Thank you. Thank you so much. Ms. +Jayapal from Washington I see you driving, welcome. + Ms. Jayapal. Thank you Madam Chair. I am not driving I +promise you, but I am in a car because I didn't want to miss +this very important hearing. It is clear that the pandemic has +had a negative impact on college enrollment for all students, +particularly low-income, first generation, and certainly +freshman of color, who we've seen a nearly 30 percent decline +in community college enrollment across the country. + And since a degree, a higher education degree, whether it's +skills training, or a four year college, remains a strong +pathway to the middle class our economic recovery may be +largely dependent on affordable access to postsecondary +education. And that's why I'm excited for the Seattle Promise +Program in my district, and proposals like My College for All +Act which President Biden has embraced, to make both four-year +and two year public higher education free for families earning +up to $125,000.00. + Mr. Thornton it's very clear from your testimony that +Federal programs like TRIO have been meaningful to you +personally, and in your student career, in spite of programs +that help some students shoulder the cost of textbooks, +housing, food, and childcare, data still shows that due to +COVID-19 as many as 56 percent of students will need additional +aid to stay enrolled. + Is it your opinion that more comprehensive Federal +assistance would help students to stay in school? + Mr. Thornton. Yes. Thank you so much for asking, and I +definitely agree that additional funding would help students be +able to stay in school. I think kind of being a living +testimony to the current situation with the pandemic, me plus a +bunch of other students like myself, some people we literally +worked, some students we worked to actually stay in school to +pay tuition, to pay to afford books and school materials. + And I think that additional funding definitely would assist +in the students being able to stay in school, and pursue their +dreams, or their dream job, or pursue a career with their +major. + Ms. Jayapal. So important. Thank you so much. Considering +Pell has gone from covering 80 percent of the [audio issues] to +less than 30 percent at a public four-year college, would you +speak more on this disparity making college increasingly out of +reach for too many people? + Mr. Vassar. I think the beginning of your question was not +heard Congresswoman Jayapal. + Ms. Jayapal. Oh OK, thank you. This is a question for +Chancellor Oakley. Non-tuition costs are an important +consideration since Pell has gone from covering 80 percent of +expenses to less than 30 percent at a public four-year college. +Would you speak more on this disparity making college +increasingly out of reach for too many people? + Mr. Oakley. Absolutely and thank you for that question +Representative Jayapal. This is particularly an acute situation +in states like California. High cost of living states, high +cost of living communities. Our students, particularly those +who attend California community colleges and those who attend +broad access public institutions come from some of the lowest +income communities in California and throughout the country. + So the cost of attending college is the most significant +cost. States like California for example, the California +community colleges has the lowest tuition in the country. In +addition, more than half of our students don't pay tuition +because of the California College Promise. + So the cost of attending college, the true cost of +attending college is the issue that keeps so many students from +one, attending college, and two, attending full-time because so +many of them have to juggle multiple issues, have to maintain +work in order to provide for their families and for their own +education. + So Pell is a significant component to helping those +individuals afford to go to college, to complete their college +education in a four-year period of time. And it has not been +keeping up with the cost of attending college. + And so supporting an increase in Pell is certainly +something that we support, as well as continuing to reduce the +cost of attendance is also a key ingredient. + Ms. Jayapal. Thank you so much. And my College For All bill +would double Pell, and it would allow states with tuition +programs to redirect any of their savings toward making college +more accessible. How would--my College for All bill also uses a +Federal/State partnership to make public four-year universities +free for qualifying students. + Chancellor, how would having a Federal partnership that +allows states to redirect savings to non-tuition costs help +colleges nationally as they struggle with low enrollment? + Mr. Oakley. Well I believe this Federal/State partnership +is critical. States are in the primary role of providing +support for our colleges and universities and they're doing-- +states like California are doing a remarkable job of providing +the additional support, lowering tuition, keeping tuition low, +keeping the cost of college low. + So this partnership would be beneficial in that states like +California could use those additional resources to provide +additional support for students, either support services or +support for non-tuition related costs. + Ms. Jayapal. Thank you so much. And this is a key important +piece, and I look forward to working with you. Madam Chair I +yield back. + Chairwoman Wilson. Thank you. Thank you so much. According +to my records Mr. Good of Virginia is the next questioner. Mr. +Good you're on. + Mr. Good. Thank you Madam Chairman, and thank you to all of +our witnesses for being with us today. My questions will be +directed specifically to Dr. Burke. Dr. Burke I wanted to ask +you how do you think Federal funding has contributed to the +exploding costs of higher education? + Ms. Burke. Well thank you for that question Representative +Good. It has clearly contributed. If you look at the inflation +adjusted tuition rates since the 1970's. Those have quintupled +at both public and private colleges across the country. And +then when you compare that number to Federal subsidies, and +those subsidies over the same time period have really increased +dramatically with spending on student loans rising 328 percent +over the last 30 years, from about 20 billion in 1990 to about +87.5 billion in the most recent year of data available. + So, and I would also say that this question of +disinvestment and State spending is I think, also a little bit +off the mark. Because if you look at appropriations for public +colleges and universities at the State level, those have +increased $1,700.00 per pupil in real terms since 1980. + So it is safe to say, I would agree with Economist Richard +Vetter at the University of Ohio that dumping Federal subsidies +out of helicopters as he once put it, has only enabled +universities to increase their costs, their spending +profligately, and really pass that on to students. + Mr. Good. I've had students tell me, and parents tell me +that once they get on the student loan treadmill it just +continues. In other words they get loans, it's almost you have +to work deliberately to stop the student loans from coming. +Once you enroll that first semester that first year, it seems +automatic. + In your testimony you talked about requiring university's +report on the use of Federal funding. What specific questions +might you ask them to report on? + Ms. Burke. Sure. And I think specifically with regard to +the new money that has gone out the door, we really need to +know whether colleges are using these funds to actually help +students who are struggling. There's statutory requirements. +About 50/50 of those dollars going to student-based aid, and +then the other 50 percent going to institutional priorities, +but we really do need to take a look and encourage colleges, +and the Department of Ed to assess if they're sending that +money to students who are financially struggling. + And then second I would say, we should assess if they're +actually using those funds to build out their IT and distance +learning capacities to navigate any sort of similar existential +threat in the future that they might face like another +pandemic. + Mr. Good. You've done a great job of verbalizing what most +of us have already seen in the way that college education costs +are just going through the roof, far outpacing inflation, +multiple times over. + Besides addressing funding, what policies do you think +Congress could do that could help enact the amount of the non- +classroom, non-education expenses specifically, the more what +many might think are wasteful or exorbitant, or excessive, +whether it's staff, or whether it's activities that are being +funded. + What role do you think Congress could play. How could +Congress help address the amount of spending that's going to +administrative type and other, maybe what some people might +think, excessive and wasteful spending? + Ms. Burke. Well I think the single best thing Congress +could do would be eliminate the Plus Loan program. The Grad +Plus Loan program in particular, this allowed graduate students +to borrow up to the cost of attendance, and then the Parent +Plus program allows parents to borrow for their undergrad +student's college experience. + And that really encourages, a family level of debt, and +family level borrowing for families. So eliminating the Plus +Loan program would be the No. 1 step to take. And as I +mentioned earlier, actually allowing colleges themselves to +limit the amount of money that students borrow. + Mr. Good. It seems we have systemic issues where there's +not a partnership between parents, families if you will, of +students and the institutions, and trying to together work to +make college affordable without putting people of course into +excessive debt. + What might be included? What role might Congress play to +help improve competition in such that like a career in +education, a technical education, temporary programs, +vocational programs, community college, and other workforce +development pathways might be able to get on equal footing with +the traditional four-year school. + Ms. Burke. Yes thanks. Again, I think one of the best +options there would actually be reforming accreditation, +decoupling Federal financing from accreditation to allow new +quality assurance mechanisms to pop up, to allow a State to for +instance, enable the Mayo Clinic to credential a nursing +course, or the State of Virginia to allow Mount Vernon to +credential a history course. + And then enable Title IV funds to actually follow students +to those individually credentialled courses and courses of +study. And again, couple that with those short-term options for +Title IV funding that would allow individuals to go find the +skills and competencies they need immediately without going +through a four-year brick and mortar college, would be a second +extremely important step in that direction. + Mr. Good. I think I've about expired my time. I thank you +very much for answering my questions, and again appreciate you +and all the other witnesses being with us today. I yield back +my time Chairman. + Chairwoman Wilson. Thank you so much. Ms. Leger Fernandez +of New Mexico welcome. + Ms. Leger Fernandez. Hello. Thank you so much Chair Wilson. +And thank you to the witnesses for joining us today. Mr. Zibel, +we've heard misrepresentations about your testimony. Would you +like to respond quickly? + Mr. Zibel. Thank you Congresswoman. You know I think there +were two comments. One from Ranking Member Foxx. I guess to put +it bluntly, I don't think I said anything about punishment not +being important. I think it is an important aspect of deterring +misconduct. + And when there is an institution of higher education, and +we've seen this for decades. I really would encourage the +Members to go back and look at the bipartisan report that +Senator Sam Nunn and his committee drafted, back in the early +nineties. + And it really is deja vu all over again for some of what +we've been seeing. And you know this is about protecting +students at the front end. This is about making sure that +students aren't saddled with debt, that they will never repay +because of worthless degrees. This is about making sure that +individuals are getting the economic opportunity through +education to better their lives, and to ensure that the +taxpayer investment in this, through grants and loans is being +well spent. + So you know it's not about partisan politics. I think if +you look back at the history of this, Secretary Bennett, the +Education Secretary under President Reagan was a fierce critic +of the for-profit education industry, and for good reason at +that time. And you know, history has a tendency to repeat +itself, and you know, that's what the Department of Education +needs to be doing, is really making sure that that does not +happen again. + It does not happen to saddle yet another generation of +students with these mountains of debts that will never be +repaid. + Ms. Leger Fernandez. Thank you for that clarification, and +also making sure that we all focus. Our focus should be, +indeed, on the students. And in thinking about the focus on the +students I am, like the chair and others who have testified +today, concerned about the non-tuition costs of college, and +that the pandemic has simply worsened food insecurity, and that +that's something that the Rescue Act can address with the +emergency funding. + Miss Chairwoman, I ask unanimous consent to enter into the +record an article from the Santa Fe Reporter entitled, ``New +Mexico College Students Face Food Insecurity.'' + Chairwoman Wilson. So ordered. + Ms. Leger Fernandez. I'm also concerned about declines in +student enrollment. And students of color in particular, right, +have seen steep enrollment declines during the pandemic. In New +Mexico, as an example, we've seen about a 10 percent decline +from fall 2019 to fall 2020. + We are also in New Mexico, facing the need to diversify our +energy sector and move to a green economy, and will really need +those partnerships without our higher education schools to lead +in training for this just renewable innovative economy, like I +like to say, in New Mexico. + In Santa Fe Community College we just partnered with our +National Labs and the renewable energy sector connecting +schools and employers. Chancellor Ortiz Oakley, what do you +believe are the best practices to recover student enrollment, +and especially addressing those programs which could develop +the workforce for new economies like the green economy? + Mr. Oakley. Thank you for that question Congresswoman. +First and foremost, I strongly believe that community colleges +are the greatest answer to a recovery with equity in America. +They are closest to the students that we're talking about. They +open their arms to every student, whether recently displaced +worker, or a recent graduate from a high school. + And community college is college, so they are preparing +students for success in 21st Century economy. So first of all, +I believe one of the greatest impacts on our students has been +the economic fallout, the health effects from the pandemic. Our +communities of color and low-income communities have been hit +the hardest. So for them it is an economic issue, so providing +direct, emergency support of any kind possible, is one of the +best antidotes to helping them be able to make the choice +between paying rent, and paying for their tuition and books, so +that they can continue their education. + Second, it's addressing the needs of displaced workers. So +many working adults were already struggling post the last +recession. This pandemic, the economic fallout, has devastated +their opportunity to be in the economy in a meaningful way. So +supporting short-term, career-training programs, to help get +the support, the skills and competencies that workers need +today, I think is critically important to a recovery with +equity. + Ms. Leger Fernandez. Thank you very much Chancellor, I +yield back. + Chairwoman Wilson. Thank you. Ms. Miller-Meeks of Iowa +you're next. You're now live. + Ms. Miller-Meeks. Thank you so much. I appreciate it Madam +Chair. Thank you for holding this subcommittee hearing, and for +providing for the witness testimonies. Thank all of you for +testifying today. So I'm a little unusual. I'm one of eight +kids. When I was burned at 15, decided to become a doctor. And +so I left home at 16. + I actually enrolled in San Antonio Junior College as it was +called at that time, then was able to get a degree in nursing, +a master's in education and ultimately a medical degree. So I +fully support what you've said about community colleges and a +pathway for education, especially for minority, for women, for +under-represented groups of low-income, but actually for any +student who wishes to go onto college, especially if they're +concerned and aren't quite sure what they want to major in, or +what will be a successful career path for them. + Having said that I was able to work, go to school and have +a combination of loans. And so my question for Dr. Burke is +that there appears to be a dramatic rise in the number of loans +borrowed for graduate level programs, and often these graduate +level programs lead to high-paying jobs. + And I'm concerned about the combination of unlimited +Federal lending, and unlimited loan forgiveness for these +individuals who may ultimately result in a higher income career +pathway. So can you briefly explain in you're concerned about +this, and you know what can Congress do to create a responsible +lending program, and how can these reforms lead to lowered +college cost for students? + Ms. Burke. Great thank you Representative Miller-Meeks. I +appreciate that. It is, it's a major concern I think for many +of us. The proposals that are out there right now to forgive +student loan debt anywhere from $10,000.00 to $50,000.00 and +student loan debt, depending on what proposal you look at, are +incredibly regressive in nature. + They would really shift the burden of paying for college +away from those individuals who do in fact directly benefit +from their education onto, as I mentioned, the two-thirds of +Americans who don't have bachelors degrees, and would +presumably not earn as much down the road on average, as their +college-going counterparts. + And you also bring up a really important point, which is +the point about professional degrees and borrowing. We know +that individuals who pursue professional degrees in particular, +on average, do quite well. Doctors, lawyers, and so the idea +that we would forgive those student loans among those +individuals who statistically speaking are likely to earn a +decent living moving forward, really, as I said earlier, is +regressive. + And so I think to get back to my earlier point, if we want +to drive down costs, we need to tackle the Plus Loan program. +The private lending market will meet the needs of students who +are pursuing professional degrees, knowing full well that their +ability to repay those loans will be very high in the future. + Ms. Miller-Meeks. Thank you for that. And in Iowa we have +concurrent enrollment for high school and for community +colleges as pathways to success. We also have the Iowa Student +Loan program, and you had mentioned about private lending and +Federal lending. + We're very concerned. They do a great job of mentoring +students, advising them, looking at if they're a certain +educational pathway, how that will result in income and ability +to pay back loans. And I'm concerned about, you know, doing +away with an institution such as the Iowa Student Loan program +which does a great job of preparing students and also giving +financial literacy. + So if students want to find good jobs after college, and +that could mean that it leads to a baccalaureate, but it could +be a different career pathway. And there is a discrepancy +between what students feel like they know what employers say +about their job readiness, and I just was going to ask if there +are some non-traditional education pathways that students +should be exploring, Dr. Burke. + Ms. Burke. Thank you. There certainly are a lot of really +innovative non-traditional pathways that are out there, and I +think interest is growing in these pathways, because we know +that employers, as I mentioned earlier, are reporting that +students who attend the traditional four-year route, aren't +often prepared. + There was a survey that came out in 2018 from the National +Association of Colleges and Employers that found that although +almost 80 percent of students believe they're proficient in +oral and written communication, just 42 percent of employers +agreed. + And then that survey was followed-up by a subsequent survey +from the Association of American Colleges and Universities that +found that similarly, while 62 percent of students felt they +were competent in these skills, just 28 percent of employers +agreed. So this gap in skills was eluded to earlier, does have +negative economic impacts. + It's left more than six million jobs empty across the +country, so I think all of that calls into question the value +add for a lot of institutions. + Ms. Miller-Meeks. Thank you Madam Chair. I yield back my +time. + Chairwoman Wilson. Thank you, thank you. And now our good +friend Mr. Jones of New York. Welcome to the committee, +welcome. + Mr. Jones. Thank you so much for your leadership Madam +Chair. And thank you to all of the witnesses for appearing +before us today. On behalf of the American people I want to +thank Chancellor Oakley for your innovative work to address the +challenges faced by community college students during the +pandemic. + Mr. Zibel, for your work to hold the bad actors in our +higher education system accountable, and of course Mr. Thornton +for sharing your important first-hand experiences as a student +during these hard times. While the ongoing pandemic has put a +strain on colleges and universities, we can all agree that the +core problems in U.S. higher education predate the COVID-19 +pandemic. + Wages have been stagnant for literally decades when you +adjust for inflation, even as the cost of a four-year college +education has soared. The average debt of someone graduating +from a four-year college or university today is four times +higher than it was in the early nineties, and this burden is +not shared equally. + Women, people of color, and members of the LGBTQ community +hold a disproportionate amount of student debt, and find +themselves less likely to graduate with a four-year degree. In +my district, in Westchester and Rockland Counties in New York, +where the cost of living is sky-high, thousands of young people +must live at home with their parents in part, due to the +student debt that they shoulder. + This delays, or outright forecloses their home ownership, +which we know to be the single greatest generator of wealth in +America. So I look forward to working with my colleagues to +address these issues, and want to thank them for their work to +make college accessible, affordable, and equitable for all. + Before turning to my questions, I do want to set the record +straight on the idea that increases in financial aid somehow +lead to increases in tuition. That is simply not true. First of +all no study on the so-called Bennett hypothesis has been able +to find convincing evidence that this hypothesis is real, at +least at public institutions. + However, a rigorous study found that for-profit +institutions eligible for Federal student aid, charged 78 +percent more than comparable programs at ineligible, for-profit +institutions. This strongly suggests that we need better +oversight of the for-profit sector, not that we should stop +providing students with Federal aid to enroll in college. + Mr. Zibel, I'd like to begin with you. As you stated in an +interview last year, there are many problems for the government +to address in this country right now, and the Department of +Education doesn't have to wait for Congress to act when it +comes to providing student debt relief. + I've been a leader on this issue in the Congress. Indeed +Congress has already given the Department of Education clear +statutory authority to forgive Federally owned student debt +under the Higher Education Act. So Mr. Zibel would you agree +that under existing law, yes or no, the President or his +education secretary has the ability to forgive federally-owned +student loan debt with a stroke of a pen. + Mr. Zibel. So thank you Congressman for your question, and +I appreciate your earlier commentary leading up to it. This is +an important topic, and something that I understand that the +White House and the department are taking a very, very close +look at. You know quite frankly it is not something I have ever +taken the kind of legal dive that I think needs to be taken. + And I really want to defer to the experts who have taken +the dive on that one before, commenting in front of Congress +today. But I think what's immediately clear is that there are +buckets of student loan borrowers for whom that immediate 100 +percent loan relief is doable right now. These are the 400,000 +borrowers who government has already determined are eligible +for total and permanent disability discharges. + These are the borrowers that the department has already +found victimized by predatory for-profit colleges. These are +borrowers who are attending schools that closed. And government +needs to be taking those steps right now today, to discharge +100 percent of those loans. + Mr. Jones. Yes. Mr. Zibel I appreciate that, reclaiming my +time, and actually I agree with you, and I would like to enter +it back into the record a paper you co-authored in October 2020 +on this very issue of for-profit colleges, personally causing +financial losses to students and taxpayers because of their +misconduct. Madam Chair I'd like to enter that into the record. + Chairwoman Wilson. So ordered. + Mr. Jones. And I would just to put a finer point on this, I +understand that you don't consider yourself an expert on this +subject, but Mr. Zibel you would at least agree that the +Department of Education has already used its statutory +authority to pause the collection of student debt, and indeed +the accrual of interest, which is obviously a form of student +debt cancellation, yes or no? + Mr. Zibel. Yes. I mean quite---- + Mr. Jones. Thank you. Reclaiming my time. Thank you so +much. And finally, as we close, as concerns about the spread of +COVID-19 increase, so did reported incidents of bullying, +racism, and xenophobia toward the Asian, Asian American, and +Asian Pacific Islander, or AAPI communities on college campuses +across the country. + Consequently, individuals from these communities reportedly +afraid to engage on basic day to day tasks, like going to the +grocery store, or walking alone in their neighborhoods. +Chancellor Oakley, what can colleges and universities do to +ensure that AAPI students feel safe and valued in their classes +and on campuses? + Mr. Oakley. Thank you for that question Congressman. First +of all to be very clear, all colleges and universities should +immediately and clearly repudiate any attacks on the Asian +American or Pacific Islander community. We need to engage +directly with our students, our faculty and our staff to +discuss these issues, to ensure that we remove the stigma that +has been applied to Asian American communities around the +COVID-19 pandemic, or anything else. + So we should treat this issue like we would any other +racial reckoning issue and take it on head-on. We have a direct +role in that, and we have our classrooms and our colleges, and +our microphone to be able to weigh in on this. + Mr. Jones. Thank you sir. Madam Chair I yield back. + Chairwoman Wilson. Thank you so much. Let me be mindful to +the witnesses. There's a time limit. And when you see stop I +will give you the opportunity to finish your thought, but not a +whole minute. Some of these issues are so important we need to +address them, but we have to be fair. Thank you so much. And +now Mrs. McClain of Michigan you're now live Mrs. McClain. + Mrs. McClain. Thank you so much Madam Chair. I appreciate +the opportunity to be on this committee, and I appreciate +everyone on the committee as well as all the witnesses. My +question is really regarding oversight and directed to Dr. +Burke. + You suggest Congress keep a watch on the tens of billions +of dollars colleagues are spending in emergency relief. What +exactly are some categories of expenses you are most interested +in, and what indicators should Congress pay attention to that +show it used taxpayers money responsibly? + Ms. Burke. Thank you for that question Representative +McClain. So as I eluded to earlier, there are statutory +allowances for these additional funds, and then there are the I +think recommendations for what colleges should be using these +funds for. + So for example, the public and non-profit schools can use +the money in these emergency higher education reform dollars +for financial aid to students, and then they can use about half +for institutional revenue, so that can be anything from faculty +and staff training, it can be payroll costs, it can be +backfilling lost revenue, it can be backfilling lost revenue +due to a lack of sporting events, so it really runs the gamut. + So those are indeed allowable uses of these funds. At the +university level though, I think what they really should be +using these funds for is to support struggling students. And as +I said earlier, build out their IT infrastructures so that they +can navigate these challenges in the future. + And so I think that's the role of oversight at the +Department of Ed, is to really look at what they're doing. They +do have to submit reports, universities do regularly on how +they're spending these funds. I hope the department makes those +reports as public as possible. + Mrs. McClain. Thank you. I yield back my time. Thank you +very much. + Chairwoman Wilson. Thank you. We'll now hear from Ms. +Manning of North Carolina. + Ms. Manning. Thank you Madam Chair, and thank you to all +the witnesses for being with us today. My first question is to +Chancellor Oakley. I have two terrific community colleges in my +district. I visited them when I was in district last to see the +incredible things they're doing, and how they're holding up +during his pandemic. + They're doing all they can to support their students, but +they have seen enrollment decline. How have you handled the +tuition, the reduce tuition revenue from declining enrollment +if your community colleges had to take cost-cutting measures? +And if so, what kinds of things are they doing? + Mr. Oakley. Thank you for that question Representative +Manning. And North Carolina has amazing community colleges. +First of all, the pandemic has had a direct impact on the +revenue and expenses that community colleges have had to incur. + One, as you mentioned, there has been a decline in +enrollment. This means a decline in student fees, tuition, +other revenue that colleges collect, as well as the increased +cost to going remote or online almost overnight, providing the +training to support the faculty, and the direct support to +students. + So what we've done is work first and foremost with a State, +the legislature and the Governor, to make sure that they are +aware of those costs, and make sure they are aware of those +revenue declines. + Fortunately, Governor Newsom and the legislature provided +direct support for our colleges and universities, and we've +also been working with Congress. We're very appreciative of the +aid that you've provided us. I do agree that that aid needs to +go to support students, and support the classrooms, so that we +can become more resilient. + And I think by and large, community colleges across the +Nation have done exactly that. They have been on the front +lines. They did an amazing job of on a dime, transitioning to +remote learning, and that remote learning has had a cost. And +so we need to continue to support community colleges like yours +in North Carolina, because they do the yeoman's work in +supporting those who have been hit hardest by the pandemic. + Ms. Manning. Thank you. And as hope is on the horizon and +we look toward the post-pandemic world, what steps do you think +community colleges can take to reverse those enrollment +declines? + Mr. Oakley. Well I think given the resources that have been +made available, community colleges need to be reaching out +directly to their communities, directly to their students, +trying to understand what their needs are, ensuring that +emergency aid goes directly to them, and working with +employers, and community members to provide them the jobs that +they need, the hours that they need in order to make ends meet, +so that they can continue their education. + So I think that is the beauty of community colleges, they +are in communities, they work with community members, mayors, +employers, that has to be done on steroids in order for us to +reach those students. + Ms. Manning. Thank you. Let me ask you about another area. +I am a former immigration attorney, and the plight of +undocumented students is one that is of great concern to me. +And I believe we need to find a pathway to citizenship for our +DACA students, as well as a pathway to success for all of our +future workers. + Is this something that you believe we need to address, and +do you have any comments on what we can be doing to address +this? + Mr. Oakley. We absolutely need to address this. California +community colleges have over 70,000 DACA students, the largest +of any State in the country. These are individuals that serve +their communities. They work in their communities. They do +everything possible to support their communities, so we need to +provide them the support that they need to come out of the +shadows, get the education that they need, and contribute +meaningfully to the economy, and to support their families. + So absolutely, we would implore Congress to codify the DACA +program, and to provide a pathway to citizenship. + Ms. Manning. Thank you so much sir. I'm going to turn to +Mr. Zibel. I recently received an e-mail from a constituent who +was very concerned because her non-profit college is being +merged with an out of State institution that was formerly a +for-profit institution, but is becoming non-profit. + And in tracking colleges that convert from for-profit to +non-profit status, the Century Foundation found that three non- +profit schools with the most fraudulent complaints were those +that had converted to non-profit status, but have not truly +shifted their governance or power structures away from owners +who had a financial interest. + What are for-profits colleges, or why rather, are for- +profit colleges increasingly converting to non-profit status, +and what role should the Education Department play in ensuring +that if they say they're non-profit they actually are? + Mr. Zibel. So I see that my time is just about up, if it I +may permitted this briefly, I can try and do that. I think the +reality is that the department needs to be scrutinizing +transactions very, very carefully to make sure that what is a +bona fide non-profit, is actually a non-profit and that a for- +profit is not acting as a non-profit. + And I think GAO put out a report about a month and a half +ago or so, on this issue, actually said the department was +doing a better job of reviewing these and scrutinizing these, +but really this isn't a one stop look at a school, it's got to +be a long-term constant review to make sure that the people who +are profiting before aren't still profiting after the +transaction. + Ms. Manning. Thank you so much and I yield back. + Chairwoman Wilson. Thank you so much, thank you. I know +it's hard remotely. Next we'll hear from Mr. Comer of Kentucky. + Mr. Comer. Thank you Madam Chair, and I'm going to wear +both my committee hats with these questions, my Education +Committee as well the Oversight Committee. Over the last few +years Congress has appropriated record levels of funding to +universities and many universities are using it well. + For instance, universities in my district have really +focused on trying to provide educational opportunities that are +focused on the workforce, and what the regional employers want +and need and offer the best paying jobs. + Kalamazoo University is a great example. They've adapted +the certification process then I have some communities +colleges--Henderson Community College, Madisonville Community +Colleges, working on some really innovative workforce +development type programs that are in need. + So the funds that have been invested in those programs +obviously have been well-spent, however there are valid +concerns that in many other instances, many of the universities +didn't serve the students with the best possible outcome and in +their best interest about the taxpayers and the student. + Last year the Trump administration issued a ruling +clarifying that only Title IV eligible students qualify to +receive emergency student aid funding provided by the CARES Act +and COVID relief. The rule is currently held up in the court +process. My question is for Dr. Burke. Do you think the rule +was consistent with other practices related to Federal student +aid? I'll stop there. + Ms. Burke. Thank you Representative Comer. I do think it is +consistent. These funds are open just to students who are Title +IV eligible, that's consistent not only with Title IV broadly, +but it's also consistent with other prior practices. If you +look at the 1996 Welfare Reform Act for example, that limited +public assistance programs to most legal immigrants for five +years, or until they attained citizenship. + So there's precedent there as well, not only in the +existing Title IV program, but also in the '96 Act. + Mr. Comer. Dr. Burke what's the most responsible way +institutions can direct these emergency student aid dollars? + Ms. Burke. Yes, right. So it's a great question. They +really should target it toward students who are in the most +need of that spending. And many of these dollars are flowing to +universities based on the proportion of students who are Pell +eligible, and so there is that built in system in place already +which was a good step in the right direction I think, a good +safeguard to put into place. + But making sure that you know at the university level, +they're not just giving a blanket across the board aid to every +student in the institution of you know $1,000.00 or whatever it +might be, but actually assessing those students who are in need +at the university level. + Mr. Comer. Great. Let me shift gears and talk about COVID- +19 that the health and educational institutions adapt to meet +the challenges of COVID-19, that the Department of Education +and Congress provided many of these institutions temporary +relief from a lot of regulatory burdens. + Dr. Burke are there any related modified regulations or +guidance that Congress should re-evaluate as institutions are +planning for future semesters? + Ms. Burke. Sure thank you. So as I mentioned earlier I +think there are a few regulations that are in place that do +deserve a second look. That elastic clause that I mentioned in +my opening testimony, I know it sounds like a very specific +reform, but right now that enables accreditors to layer on +numerous additional requirements on a university. Just a +hypothetical, if an accreditor wanted to mandate a dress code, +it's not outside of the scope of that elastic clause. + And so removing that clause to keep what accreditors can do +solely focused on the metrics that are contained within the +statute of the HEA would be a very good step in the right +direction. + Mr. Comer. OK. That's good to know. Dr. Foxx, and Fred +Keller, and myself are all on the Oversight Committee. We're +really focused on the regulatory process and the change of +administration has brought a lot of regulatory changes and +uncertainty in a lot of different industries and education +would be right in there. + So we relaxed a lot of regulations during COVID, and in +many cases that worked out very well. And I would like to make +a lot of those relaxed regulations permanent. Obviously, we +always have to look at the regulatory process, and education is +no different. So I appreciate that. And Madam Chair I +appreciate the hearing, and look forward to future hearings, +and appreciate our witnesses for being here today. I yield +back. + Chairwoman Wilson. Thank you so much. Thank you. And now +we'll hear from Mr. Bowman of New York, who is the new Vice +Chair of the full Education and Labor Committee, welcome. Proud +of you. + Mr. Bowman. Thank you Madam Chair, and thank you to all the +witnesses for being here today. My question is for Mr. +Thornton. I'm going to start with Mr. Thornton. During your +testimony you mentioned that at one point you didn't feel that +college was for you, or you didn't feel that you were college +material. I know I'm paraphrasing here. + Can you speak to why that was? Like why did you have that +feeling at that time? + Mr. Thornton. Yes. Thank you so much for that Mr. Bowman. +And the reason why I felt that way, so this was my freshman +year. And coming into school, honestly, things began to get a +little rough for me personally, primarily with school, being +able to maintain the focus on being able to uphold to the +standard of being able to achieve the school curriculum in +terms of you know the certain classes, excuse me, that I had to +take. + So with that constant pressure, me putting pressure on +myself and even with outside pressure that was not necessarily +intentional with three of my sisters are going to college, all +of them obtaining their master's degrees. + I personally had some pressure that I felt in myself with +having to reach those goals and attain that degree. And even +with being able to not fail, and feeling like I didn't want to +put my family's money at risk of just being wasted because of +where I was at. + So that's kind of the reason as to why. Those are some of +the thoughts I was having internally as far as being able to +stay in school. + Mr. Bowman. Yes I know what you mean. I have three sisters +as well, and raised by a single mom. So I know the pressure +that the women in our lives put on us. + Mr. Thornton. Yes. + Mr. Bowman. To reach their standard. So how did you +overcome it? You know what did the university provide to you in +terms of advisers, in terms of academic support, what have you, +how did you overcome that pressure and that feeling that you +didn't belong? And how were you able to set yourself right? + Mr. Thornton. Yes of course. So when it came down to +referring whether I did, it took me having to speak up, rather +than waiting for something or for someone to come to me and ask +me how I was doing. So it took me reaching out to, as I +mentioned, you know, a TRIO program instructor, Ms. Tiffany +Tyler, who has played a huge role in my life, reaching out to +her, speaking to her about some of these things. + Her guiding me and really encouraging me to continue to +push forward, and even my counterparts, my peers within the +university. I've built long-lasting relationship through the +TRIO program as I've mentioned 5000 Role Models as well. + And even you know I'm part of a club here on campus as +well. Having those people in my life, and just speaking and +sharing my heart, sharing my life with them. There are times +where I was able to do homework with them, study with them, and +it really just pushed me to stay in school to think about the +future, the ways in which I can have an impact in the world +with a degree. + So you know having people in my life was a huge component +of me deciding that this is something that I can do, and +something that I will do, and that's kind of you know pushed me +to where I am today getting ready to graduate. So that's been a +huge motivator for me. + Mr. Bowman. Thank you so much for sharing that. You're an +inspiration to me personally, and to all of us, so please keep +going brother. I appreciate you. Chancellor Oakley, since the +onset of COVID-19 there has been an increased demand from +mental health services as students deal with trauma, and +economic and health crises, in addition to managing their +school work. + Chancellor, how have your institutions managed this +increased need? + Mr. Oakley. Thank you for that question Congressman. The +mental health toll that the pandemic and the economic fallout +has taken on our students has been significant. Many of them +are in communities where we have had not only the economic +impact of COVID-19, the health impacts because many of those +communities lacked access to quality healthcare, but also the +racial reckoning that has gripped this country, happens in the +communities that we serve. + So all those things have come together. We have been +working with the Newsom administration and our legislature to +gain access to resources that help fund mental health services. +Our legislature has provided some of those resources. We are +working with counties and cities to share resources, to make +sure that our students have access to those mental health +resources, but they are only a drop in the bucket. + And this is an area where Congress also has been helpful +because some of those relief funds have been used to provide +that kind of assistance, that kind of support to our students +who need it critically right now for them to continue their +education. + Mr. Bowman. Thank you for that. Mr. Zibel, though +enrollment is trending down at community colleges, the reverse +is true for for-profit colleges. While for-profit colleges saw +substantial and consistent enrollment drops in the years +leading up to the pandemic, the sections enrollment spiked up +last fall. + This appears to be a pattern as for-profit colleges have +saw a similar enrollment spike after the Great Recession. Do +you have any concerns with these trends, and what lessons can +we learn from the years following the Great Recession? + Chairwoman Wilson. Mr. Vice Chair your time is up. + Mr. Bowman. Oh sorry, thank you. + Chairwoman Wilson. Thank you. Someone else--he'll probably +answer it in another question from another Member. Thank you so +much. We'll now go to Ms. Spartz of Indiana. + Ms. Spartz. Thank you Madam Chair. I just have a question +to all the panel. You know we all agree we have a lot of +problems and challenges in higher ed. I was a college faculty +myself, and I also taught in public accounting college. It was +a national team, a trainer for several other accounting firms. +We had a lot of talk, a lot of discussions, a lot of different +performances, so I understand it. + We need to have better return on investment, following +investments in human capital. Colleges need to have skin in the +game, and we need to have better outcomes, not worthless +diplomas, none of that, inflated grades and all these things +and now the kids are not ready to life-long learning. + So my question is we had lots of talk, lots of discussion, +proposal but nothing ever gets done. So my question is, and +I'll start with Dr. Burke, is there any prospects where +actually something gets done, or we'll be discussing for next +10 years how we're going to reform higher ed and nothing is +going to happen. + So what are your thoughts on the prospect of anything +happening in the near future. + Ms. Burke. Thank you for that question Congresswoman +Spartz. So I think the prospect for reforms like moving on +either short-term Pell, or enabling students to use their Title +IV funds for shorter term courses. I think the prospects are +pretty good for that in terms of bipartisan support overall. + There are, of course, some inherent concerns with some of +these proposals that you don't increase spending overall on +these programs when you enable those dollars to flow to shorter +term courses, but I think that there are ways to structure +those reforms to make sure that the cap remains tight, but +still enable students to have more flexibility and to make +those dollars more nimble. + Ms. Spartz. But I'm talking about better outcomes in all +postsecondary education, so having real reform when we +understand that you know, we should bring some value right? If +we're going to invest in human capital, and use taxpayers money +particularly to do that, we need to have a return on +investment. + And colleges need to have skin in the game, and they +shouldn't be piling up all this debt on these kids, a lot of +them, with no jobs right? Because I only care if you have a +job, and you have some meaningful employment that it brings +some value. + So is there any prospect of having that ever accomplished? + Ms. Burke. So I do think that there is some agreement that +in general the current metrics for example, the cohort default +rate, are just really not cutting it in terms of providing the +data that we need and the, you know, oversight that we need for +some of these institutions. + And so there are conversations that are happening about +changing that metric to something maybe closer to a +programmatic default rate that could work better. There is +still going to be problems inherent in that approach as well, +and so to my mind it all comes back to the fact that we are +even having this conversation because Federal taxpayers are +implicated, and financing so much of the higher education +system today. + So winding down the debt in the student loan program, I +think is a necessary precondition for reigning in costs and +providing some needed accountability. + Ms. Spartz. Yes our colleges do have to have skin in the +game too. + Ms. Burke. Yes. + Ms. Spartz. So I'm sure. Dr. And Mr. Zibel and Mr. Oakley, +and maybe Mr. Thornton quickly. Do you think there is any +prospect of meaningful reform in the near future? Yes, no, +because I'm not sure how much time I have left. + Mr. Zibel. I actually think there is Congresswoman, and +especially you know if you talk about skin in the game, and +making sure that there's value. + I think one of the most important things that +administration can do is bring back the Gainful Employment +Rule, which was designed to solve exactly the kind of problems +that you were just referring to where students are graduating +from programs without any prospect of employment in +relationship to the amount of debt that they are taking. + Secretary DeVos repealed that rule. And you know I'm +hopeful that the Department of Education can bring it back, and +actually give it time to work going forward. + Ms. Spartz. Mr. Oakley? + Mr. Oakley. Short answer is yes. I see a lot of reform +happening. The fact that you have a person from a community +college testifying today means that things are changing, that +we are recognizing the value that institutions like community +colleges provide to the country. So I'm very hopeful and I see +a lot of change in California. + Ms. Spartz. OK. Well hopefully we'll stay optimistic and +get some hope. Mr. Thornton what do you think? You're probably +new to all this. + Mr. Thornton. Yes I definitely am new to all this. But I +would say that I do have hope and faith that there will be a +change moving forward in the future. I'm excited to see how +things continue to grow and to progress as Mr. Oakley attested +to. You know, him coming from a community college background I +think is amazing just to see him here now, and just even having +that same dream and hope for other people that were in his +position. + So I definitely feel good moving forward to see some +changes in America. + Ms. Spartz. OK thank you. I will stay hopeful, and I'll +yield back. + Chairwoman Wilson. Thank you. Thank you so much. And a +veteran Member of the committee now, I yield to Mr. Pocan. How +are you, Wisconsin. + Mr. Pocan. Very good thank you Madam Chair, and I +appreciate. Thanks to the witnesses, and my apologies to +everyone for coming back and forth. Every vote we have is 45 +minutes. Unfortunately, we have about 100 colleagues who have +not been vaccinated so we can't shorten the time period, and +it's chaotic because of it. So my apologies up front. + A very quick yes/no question Dr. Burke. I'm hoping, I'm not +sure if I heard something right. Were you just talking about +winding down the student loan programs? Is that a yes or no in +the near future? + Ms. Burke. Yes. + Mr. Pocan. OK yes. Thank you. I'll move on. So Mr. +Thornton. I was someone who when I went to school I grew up in +a lower middle class family, got lots of student loans, Pell +Grants, things that Ms. Burke apparently doesn't like. + And that's why I was able to go to college, and get a +degree and appreciate, you know, what you're talking about +right now and the support that you got. I think also part of +the testimony was that all this money went to the +administrative ether at universities, but I assume you like me, +don't consider our lives administrative ether. + You talked a little bit in your opening remarks about how +some of the support from the programs that we've done with +COVID helped you very directly to be able to continue to be +able to go to school. Can you talk a little more, just a little +more about that, or about any friend's stories also that have +been helped because of the programs that Congress did around +COVID? + Mr. Thornton. Yes. Thank you so much for that Mr. Pocan. +And I could speak for myself personally, kind of like what I +mentioned as far as the last semester, the fall semester that +just passed. Me initially having a job, me being able to take +care of myself financially, whether it be with school expenses, +or expenses outside of school whether it was rent or bills. + Me losing my job put me in a position to where I just +really had to take a lot from my personal savings, so with the +funding that was provided I was able to provide for myself in +different ways, primarily with school and you know school +materials. + And in addition to that things outside of school. So the +funding that was provided definitely played a huge role in my +life personally, and you know I could definitely speak about +that for sure. + Mr. Pocan. Thank you. What's your major by the way? I don't +know if I caught that because we're always back and forth. I +didn't catch that. + Mr. Thornton. Oh yes of course. My major is recreation and +sports management. + Mr. Pocan. Awesome. Well I wish you great fortune with +that, and thanks so much for being here and sharing your +stories. A question for Chancellor Oakley. You know we just had +a staff assistant position open in my office. We got 330 +applications for it, and we noticed a lot of them graduated in +May 2020 and have not had a job since then, obviously because +of COVID. + Is there anything that universities are doing, or should be +doing to kind of help that student, that this year has been an +incredibly tough year? Many of them probably are living back +home because we noticed the addresses are from around the +country. But what can we do to help those students, because you +know, I'm glad that they were able to get the education, but I +know the next connecting step is to a good job. + Mr. Oakley. So very quickly. I mean working with employers, +working with industries to provide for some type of paid +internship I think is critical for all college graduates to +have the opportunity to get into the workforce as soon as +things start to open up. + It's critically important that college students have access +to have the skills that they need, but also in terms of what +they need to do the work, but how to exist in a place of +employment. So I think we need to double our efforts to help +students get some sort of workforce opportunity, internship or +other paid workforce training. + Mr. Pocan. Great. Thank you. And then a final followup if I +can because I have to go to vote on this series now. It has to +do with Dr. Burke's question that we need to wind down our +financial aid programs, that there's just too much of a largess +out there. + Mr. Oakley. Well I think we agree on the umbrella which is +there is too much debt. I do think that we need to continue to +improve the amount of resources that we're providing to the +lowest income Americans and help them pay for the cost of +attending college which continues to increase. + Mr. Pocan. And that includes more Pell I would assume. + Mr. Oakley. Absolutely. + Mr. Pocan. Great. Thank you very much. I yield back Madam +Chair. + Chairwoman Wilson. Thank you, thank you. According to my +records Ms. Harshbarger of Tennessee you can go on the record. +Mr. Fulcher of Idaho? Ms. Stefanik of New York? Mr. Banks of +Indiana? Ms. Omar of Minnesota. + Ms. Omar. Thank you very much chairwoman, and thanks to all +our witnesses for joining us. To Mr. Pocan's point it's been a +really busy day, so I do apologize if some of the questions I +ask have already been asked of you. Even before the COVID-19 +pandemic hit, there were many students who were struggling to +cover the cost of basic needs like housing, food and childcare. + The COVID-19 pandemic has added to many of the hurdles +faced by minority and low-income students working to complete +their college educations. And these challenges are compounded +for student parents. + A recent report including the GAO study, has highlighted +the challenges that a student parents face in terms of college +persistence and completion. Madam Chair I request unanimous +consent to enter this into the record. + Chairwoman Wilson. So ordered. + Ms. Omar. Chancellor Oakley, how have child center closures +affected the ability of student parents to remain in school? + Mr. Oakley. This has had a devastating effect on our +students, and thank you for that question Congresswoman. This +has had a devastating effect. So many of our students in the +California community colleges, and this is true of community +colleges across the Nation, are working parents. + And so lack of access to childcare, and the fact that so +many of them have had their children in their household having +to work on educating them remotely, sharing Wi-Fi with them, +all of these have created challenges that have made it very +difficult for working parents to continue their education. + Ms. Omar. I appreciate that. I was a working parent when I +completed my college education, and so I'm wondering if there +is any support that colleges are providing currently to this +vulnerable student group, and if you have any recommendations +for Congress to provide support. + Mr. Oakley. Well I think right now the most important thing +to do is to provide these working parents, these students, +direct emergency support. They need economic support right now, +so that when they're making choices about whether to feed their +family, or to continue to enroll in college, we don't force +them into those choices. + So I think we need them to participate in the economy. We +need them to complete their education, so I think investing +directly in supporting these working students is critical to +our future, and to an equitable recovery. + Ms. Omar. And how do you see the creation of an environment +that does set these students up for success post-COVID? + Mr. Oakley. So I think it's critical that we work with +employers, that we work with labor organizations that support +these working parents to focus on insuring that we provide what +they need to get into jobs that pay a livable wage so they can +support their families. + Ms. Omar. I appreciate that. Madam Chair I will yield back. + Chairwoman Wilson. Thank you so much. I see Mr. Fulcher +from Idaho's camera on. I'm not sure if he is available? We'll +go now to Ms. Sherrill of New Jersey? Mr. Espaillat of New +York? Mr. Grijalva of Arizona? And a true, true veteran of the +Education Committee Mr. Courtney of Connecticut, he's here. + Mr. Courtney. Thank you Chairwoman Wilson, and thank you to +all the witnesses. Keith, your testimony has been really +stellar, and you know, congratulations to you and the Chairman +for the great work that you and her work in terms of you know, +creating these kinds of pathways for young people. + Mr. Zibel I have actually been watching a little bit out of +the corner of my eye during the hearing. Chairman Powell from +the Federal Reserve is sort of giving his sort of update +regarding the economy, and announced that again, the sort of +low interest rate, zero percent policy--monetary policy, of the +Federal Reserve is actually going to continue through 2023. + I mean a very I think, you know forceful policy position to +keep borrowing costs down. And as we know, you know, for the +last year that's been the policy, and people in the private +sector have benefited greatly from it. You know residential +property owners, credit card debt, car loan debt, but you know +the one form of debt that is still stuck with the higher +interest rates is student loan debt. + And you know President Biden's pause, which is a good thing +in terms of helping people's cash-flow, who are student loan +borrowers, that expires at the end of September 2021. And so, +you know, potentially you know those higher interest rates are +going to snap back into place. + Again, even if there is student loan forgiveness of +$10,000.00 or $50,000.00, there's still going to be a lot of +debt left over there. And so you know I was wondering if you +could sort of talk about it from a consumer point of view. I +mean the only decisionmaker that can change that is Congress. + That's pretty well understood as the President really is +not a unilateral authority under the Higher Education +Authorization to cut rates by himself, and we've done that a +number of times over you know the time that Frederica and I +have been in Congress. + You know it just seems like it screams out for action by +Congress not to let these interest rates snap back, and first +to do something about taking advantage of the low interest rate +environment. And I was wondering if you could comment on that. + Mr. Zibel. Certainly, Congressman. It's an excellent +question and I should caveat this was you know I'm not an +economist. I'm a lawyer. But you know, just as a matter of +principle I think that everything you are saying makes a lot of +sense. There is no reason why student loan borrowers should be +saddled with higher interest rates than you know, other +financial products. + I think Congress would be well to look at reforms to the +Bankruptcy Code. Student loans are not dischargeable in +bankruptcy for the most part, and that is something that I +think both the administration and Congress could be taking a +look at to really try and bring relief to borrowers who are +struggling so immensely right now. + Mr. Courtney. Well thank you. Again we've tried actually in +the last few Congresses, myself, Frederica and others have you +know cosponsored bills to bring down the interest rates. And +again, given Chairman Powell's announcement today, I mean it +really is more than high time for us to move out and create +some parody in terms of lending costs for people with student +loan debt. + And you know Mr. Oakley, I don't know if you have any sort +of comment on that. I realize maybe you know the interest rate +issue for current students is not as urgent, but certainly you +know, later in life it could really pose a real hindrance on +their success. + Mr. Oakley. Well absolutely. I mean all the things that +were just mentioned, and I certainly support Mr. Zibel's +characterization of the challenge. We need Congress to act to +support students who do have to take out these loans by +reducing the interest rate, by allowing them to go through +bankruptcy court. + So these are issues that saddle our students for decades. +And in many ways keep them from participating meaningful in the +American economy, and from creating wealth. + Mr. Courtney. Great. Well thank you. You know just to share +with the committee and the witnesses, I had a constituent who +emailed the other day about a student loan bill that he +received, which again was paying 7.8 percent interest. Again, +totally trapped. + And there was a warning quote in there that only the U.S. +Congress can lower that rate. Because you know I'm sure that +the loan servicer is getting bombarded with questions about why +do I still have to pay 7.8 percent interest when you know, +everything else is you know close to zero. + And I think you know they're basically saying call your +Congressman. So hopefully, you know, more people will talk +about that, because it really is something that we as a +committee should take a look at. And with that I yield back +Madam Chairwoman. + Chairwoman Wilson. Thank you very much. Mr. Fulcher I see +from Idaho, I see you back and forth. You are on camera. You're +next. Mr. Fulcher are you going to join us? If not we'll go to +Ms. Bonamici. + Ms. Bonamici. Thank you Madam Chair. And thank you to all +the witnesses. In particular, I want to thank Mr. Thornton. +Thank you so much for sharing your experience. It's really +helpful for us to learn from. I also want to not let it go +unsaid that there are with regard to Dr. Burke's comments about +limiting borrowing based on someone's course of study, multiple +issues and problems with that, particularly from the equity +perspective. + And very subjective who makes that decision, and you know, +just take a look someday at what philosophy majors make. +They're very successful because they know how to think +critically, and employers are looking for skills like empathy +and teamwork, and problem solving. Those are all things that +come from studying broad fields, including the humanities. + So I want to turn to Chancellor Oakley. Nice to see you +again. We know there are serious inequities in higher +education, and that's true in Oregon and across the country +even before the COVID-19 pandemic, and students were already +struggling to cover not just the cost of tuition, but we know +other expenses, housing, transportation, childcare, food. + Now there are unexpected costs because of the pandemic +adding to it. And particularly for community college students +like I was, these costs are significantly higher than the costs +of tuition. So Chancellor Oakley, recent reports including a +GAO study have highlighted food and housing insecurity, and I +have spoken with college students, particularly community +college students in Oregon about this. + I'd like to enter the GAO report into the record Madam +Chair. + Chairwoman Wilson. So ordered. + Ms. Bonamici. Thank you. So Chancellor, how are the +California community colleges providing for example, case +management and services to low-income students, and how are you +connecting them with resources like those that are available +through SNAP, WIC and TANF? And how are you making sure the +students access those resources while they're not physically on +campus? + Mr. Oakley. Thank you for that question Congresswoman +Bonamici. You are absolutely right. There was a huge crisis in +our system before the pandemic. We saw record amounts of food +insecurity. Record amounts of housing insecurity and the +pandemic has significantly exacerbated the problem. + So we have been working first and foremost, we are a +community college, we are working with cities, with non-profit +institutions, in localities where we exist in providing support +for our students. + We've provided support for technology, for food through +food pantries, and things of that nature. We've also worked +with our legislature and Governor Newsom to provide emergency +aid. Just a few weeks ago the legislature passed an emergency +action package that provides emergency support directly to +students, which will support their needs for food and housing +insecurity, as well as mental health services and other things +that are impacting them right now. + We've also continued to advocate to you all, to Congress, +and to this new administration of the need to provide this +direct emergency support. I understand---- + Ms. Bonamici. Chancellor, I don't want to interrupt but I-- +-- + Mr. Oakley. That's quite all right. + Ms. Bonamici. ----I have a consumer protection background, +so I absolutely must get a question in for Mr. Zibel. Thank you +so much for being here. The Obama administration as you know, +established the Borrower Defense Rule to streamline the process +for students to assert their right to loan forgiveness when +they're defrauded by the institution. + Unfortunately, the Trump administration failed to implement +the rule and give students the relief they deserve. So what can +the Biden administration do immediately to address the problems +with Borrower Defense that were created by the past +administration? + Mr. Zibel. Sure. Thank you for the question. There is a lot +the department can do, and I think most immediately it's taking +the issue seriously, providing relief, 100 percent relief to +the borrowers who it has already determined to have been +defrauded by a predatory college. + There is simply no excuse at this point in time for the +department dragging its heels on that. I want to, you know the +consequences for these borrowers, it's devastating for them for +an economic impact, housing impact, mental health impacts. + But the other point that I want to emphasize on this is +that these are borrowers who really feel like not only did +their school fail them, but their government failed them. Their +government failed them by putting a seal of approval on these +schools, leading them down a path, and then not giving +forgiveness, even though they've already made sufficient +findings to do so. + Ms. Bonamici. In my remaining few seconds, just to followup +on that. Some of my colleagues on the other side of the aisle +were talking about complaining about what they call +administrative bloat. But actually some of the worst bloat I'm +aware of is when colleges use Federal funds to advertise for +perspective students. + Recent data indicates that colleges spend 730 million +dollars on advertising and degree granting for-profit +institutions, and that's you know 40 percent of all higher +education advertising spending for just 6 percent of the +students, so that is something that I would say is +administrative bloat we should be looking at is what the for- +profits institutions are doing to try to recruit on often-times +students. + So I see my time is over, and I yield back. Thank you Madam +Chair. + Chairwoman Wilson. Thank you. You have a lot of seniority +but your time is up. And now Mr. Scott, esteemed Chairman of +the entire committee on Education and Labor. Do you want to +close us out? + Mr. Scott. I'll try. Thank you very much. Let me first ask +Ms. Burke you mentioned we talked about short-term Pell's, but +I think there's a consensus that this is a good idea. The only +caveat we have is people open up little storefronts and +stealing all the money, dealing out worthless credentials. + We want to limit those privately to community colleges, and +referrals from job training, workforce investment, Opportunity +Act boards. Do you think that would be sufficient to keep these +in the hands of those that are actually using them well? + Ms. Burke. I think coupled with some State accreditation +reform efforts as in enabling states to make some determination +about which industries within their state could provide those +short-term courses. I think that would be a good step in the +right direction to actually push it down to the State level, +that oversight role, in terms of quality assurance of these +programs. + Mr. Scott. Thank you. And let me ask Dr. Oakley. We have a +lot of suggestions on how to spend a lot of money on colleges, +and could you give us an idea of your priorities talking about +either free college, or free community college, double the Pell +Grant, loan discharge programs like public service loan +forgiveness, a borrower defense, or income contingent, or +discharging loans $10,000.00 or $50,000.00, or eliminate +interest on loans. + Could you tell us what we ought to be looking at first? + Mr. Oakley. Thank you Mr. Chair. First of all I mean all of +those issues are important issues to our students, but for us I +mean first and foremost allowing students to pay for the total +cost of attending college is critical, so that they can attend +full-time, so that they can complete their education and get +into the workforce. + So things like doubling Pell is critically important. Free +community college is certainly important, so that the funds +that you make available can be spent on the total cost of +attending college. And then finally I'd say supporting +colleges, community colleges in particular to reach out to +displaced workers, and helping get the skills that they need to +get back into the workforce. + Mr. Scott. We've heard a couple of comments about the +interest rates. What about significantly reducing, or even +eliminating interest. Why is the Federal Government charging +people interest? We ought to be subsidizing loans, not using it +as a profit center. + Mr. Oakley. Well I would certainly agree that a low or no +interest loans to our students who are struggling and who need +that support to get into the economy is a very important step +that Congress could take. + Mr. Scott. Thank you. Mr. Zibel during the Obama +administration the Department of Education worked with the +State law enforcement agencies, especially attorneys general to +investigate and hold for-profit colleges accountable. Can you +talk about what happened during the last 4 years, and whether +or not executives at for-profit colleges should be held +personally liable for misconduct, or financial losses to +students and taxpayers? + Mr. Zibel. Certainly, Mr. Chairman. Look, the Department of +Education has to be working alongside State and other Federal +partners. This should not be an adversarial relationship, as I +think it has been over the past 4 years. In terms of +institutional enforcement I see what the Department of +Education did in the Corinthian colleges matter. + It's a real example of when the department worked alongside +the office of then Attorney General Kamala Harris to bring an +enforcement action, and take an action against one of the most +predatory actors. + When schools are closing, the department has to be working +with states to make sure that student needs are met in terms of +transfers, and transcript availability and basic needs around +housing. + So I think that is a real important step that the +department has to be taking going forward. In terms of personal +liability, I think I mentioned a little bit earlier, +absolutely. This is not a proposal that we have come up with. +This is not a proposal that must have been developed in the +past year or two, this is something that Congress put into the +Higher Education Act about 30 years ago. + And you know President George H.W. Bush signed it into law. +It was passed by a bipartisan Congress. And I think that the +concept is really simple. That when there are institutions that +cause losses to students and taxpayers, they should be held +accountable, and the individuals that directed that conduct +should be held accountable. + The Securities and Exchange Commission for example does it +even for for-profit college executives about protecting +investors. But for some reason the Department of Education has +not done that to protect students. + So this is about deterring misconduct. If you know that you +personally may have to write a check at the end of the day, you +are probably going to be a lot better of a steward of a +taxpayer and student funds. + Mr. Scott. Thank you. And thank you Madam Chair. And I want +to thank Keith for being with us today. He's certainly an +example of why we're here. And certainly, a shining example of +why the 5,000 Role Models of Excellence are so important. So +thank you Keith for being with us today. + Chairwoman Wilson. Thank you. Thank you so much Mr. Chair. +I remind my colleagues that pursuant to committee practice, +materials for submission of the hearing record must be +submitted to the Committee Clerk within 14 days following the +last day of the hearing. + So by close of business on March 31, 2021 preferably in +Microsoft Word format. The materials submitted must address the +subject matter of the hearing. Only a Member of the +subcommittee, or an invited witness may submit materials for +inclusion in the hearing record. + Documents are limited to 50 pages each. Documents longer +than 50 pages will be incorporated into the record by way of an +internet link that you must provide to the Committee Clerk +within the required timeframe. + But please recognize that in the future that link may no +longer work. Pursuant to House rules and regulations, items for +the record must be submitted to the Clerk electronically by +email submissions to [email protected]. + Members are encouraged to submit materials to the inbox +before the hearing, or during the hearing at the time the +Member makes the request. Again, I want to thank the witnesses +for their participation today. Keith you have made FIU, Miami- +Dade County Public Schools so proud. + We love you. 5,000 Role Models love you. We are 5,000. I +want to thank you, all of the witnesses. You were absolutely +stupendous. You did a great job at our committee today. Members +of the subcommittee may have some additional questions for each +of you and we ask the witnesses to please respond to those +questions in writing. + The hearing record will be held open for 14 days in order +to receive those responses. I remind my colleagues that +pursuant to committee practice witness questions for the +hearing record, must be submitted to the Majority Committee +Staff or Committee Clerk within 7 days. The questions submitted +must address the subject matter of the hearing. + We're now into closing statements. I recognize the +Distinguished Ranking Member for a closing statement, Dr. +Murphy who is a medical doctor. + Mr. Murphy. Thank you Ms. Representative Wilson. I want to +thank you especially, but also thank the committee Members and +the panelists. I think this was an excellent, excellent +meeting, and a lot of good issues discussed. + And I think there was a lot of lessons learned today. Both +Democrats and Republicans, I think we agree. We agree very +plainly that our postsecondary education system is in need of +reform. I mean I think that I can say that without any doubt. +Everybody knows that things have got a little bit out of hand. + Where the reform may be, may be in question, and difference +of opinion about and amongst the panelists and the committee, +but I think reform my all means is a consensus statement. + College costs are obviously way too high, and continue to +rise. We simply cannot continue the rise of college costs as +they are today. We are bankrupting our students. We are doing a +disservice to our taxpayers. We simply cannot allow that. +Graduation rates are low, honestly embarrassingly low. + I look at some institutions 6 year graduation rates are in +the teens, and that's not acceptable. We're doing a disservice +to those students, and again to the taxpayers. Employers are +finding recent graduates, college graduates, ill-prepared for +college success. And that burden rests solely on our educators. + If these kids are paying so much and mortgaging their +future, our educators have the burden of making sure that +they're prepared and that their money was well-spent. You don't +continue the status quo. You don't continue to pour money into +programs that have been proven failures. They're not failing +because of lack of money. They're failing because they were bad +and poorly designed programs. + Congress acted quickly last year in a bipartisan fashion to +help the sector deal with the pandemic. I was very, very proud +to be a Member of Congress at that time because we saw the +American people, and we saw institutions in America as needing +our help and we got together in a bipartisan manner. + Most recently, not so bipartisan, and that's in my opinion, +a real shame that that occurred. But now Congress has to turn +to long-term issues. The Higher Education Act is in dire need +of reform to better serve our students. The disaster, and I +spoke about this earlier, of the rise of administrative bloat +must be reversed. + We cannot continue pouring money into institutions that do +not use it toward education and preparing our students for +success and lifelong learning. Some policy solutions have been +presented at the hearing, eliminate the Grad Plus Program, +allow institutions to limit borrowing on a programmatic basis, +an entrance into the marketplace by enabling short-term Pell +Grants and reforming the accreditation system, and also--and a +recent topic, I think reforming the interest rates on these +loans. By all means, I think that needs to be done, especially +with what we're talking about with zero rates. + I don't think loan forgiveness. All you're doing is passing +that on to individuals who actually paid for their education, +who actually worked for their education, I don't think that is +appropriate. + Not all of the ideas are bipartisan, by all means. But I +want to encourage the subcommittee to work to find workable +solutions under Madam Wilson's leadership, and I have pledged +to work together in a bipartisan manner for us to actually do +what's great for our students and what's good for their +success. Thank you Madam Chairman I will yield back. + Chairwoman Wilson. Thank you. Thank you Doctor. I now +recognize myself for the purpose of making my closing +statement. I want to again thank our expert witnesses for +joining our subcommittee's first hearing of this Congress, and +for your testimonies. + Our discussion today made clear that the relief funding we +provided for higher education over the last year has been +critical to helping both institutions and students weather the +Coronavirus pandemic. But we were also reminded that both +Congress and the Biden administration have much work to do to +ensure underserved students are not left behind in our recovery +from this pandemic. + Securing relief funding alone is a disservice to the +students. We must take bold steps to strengthen student +protections and expand access to student aid, so that we build +back a better higher education system for everyone. + This committee has a great responsibility to not only help +our higher education system survive this pandemic, but also +ensure that all students across this Nation have access, if +they want it, to a college degree that leads to a rewarding +career. I look forward to working with my colleagues to achieve +this ultimate goal. + If there is no further business before this committee +without objection, the subcommittee stands adjourned. And thank +you so much for joining us. +[GRAPHICS NOT AVAILABLE IN TIFF FORMAT] + + [Whereupon, at 3:51 p.m., the subcommittee was adjourned.] + + [all] +