diff --git "a/data/CHRG-117/CHRG-117hhrg43870.txt" "b/data/CHRG-117/CHRG-117hhrg43870.txt" new file mode 100644--- /dev/null +++ "b/data/CHRG-117/CHRG-117hhrg43870.txt" @@ -0,0 +1,3245 @@ + + - RISING TO THE CHALLENGE: THE FUTURE OF HIGHER EDUCATION POST COVID-19 +
+[House Hearing, 117 Congress]
+[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
+
+
+                  RISING TO THE CHALLENGE: THE FUTURE
+                   OF HIGHER EDUCATION POST COVID-19
+
+=======================================================================
+
+                                HEARING
+
+                               BEFORE THE
+
+                            SUBCOMMITTEE ON
+                          HIGHER EDUCATION AND
+                          WORKFORCE INVESTMENT
+
+                                 OF THE
+
+                    COMMITTEE ON EDUCATION AND LABOR
+                     U.S. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
+
+                    ONE HUNDRED SEVENTEENTH CONGRESS
+
+                             FIRST SESSION
+
+                               __________
+
+             HEARING HELD IN WASHINGTON, DC, MARCH 17, 2021
+
+                               __________
+
+                            Serial No. 117-2
+
+                               __________
+
+      Printed for the use of the Committee on Education and Labor
+
+[GRAPHICS NOT AVAILABLE IN TIFF FORMAT]                                  
+
+        Available via: edlabor.house.gov or www.govinfo.gov
+
+                               __________
+                               
+
+                    U.S. GOVERNMENT PUBLISHING OFFICE                    
+43-870 PDF                 WASHINGTON : 2022                     
+          
+-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------                               
+
+                    COMMITTEE ON EDUCATION AND LABOR
+
+             ROBERT C. ``BOBBY'' SCOTT, Virginia, Chairman
+
+RAUL M. GRIJALVA, Arizona            VIRGINIA FOXX, North Carolina,
+JOE COURTNEY, Connecticut              Ranking Member
+GREGORIO KILILI CAMACHO SABLAN,      JOE WILSON, South Carolina
+  Northern Mariana Islands           GLENN THOMPSON, Pennsylvania
+FREDERICA S. WILSON, Florida         TIM WALBERG, Michigan
+SUZANNE BONAMICI, Oregon             GLENN GROTHMAN, Wisconsin
+MARK TAKANO, California              ELISE M. STEFANIK, New York
+ALMA S. ADAMS, North Carolina        RICK W. ALLEN, Georgia
+MARK De SAULNIER, California         JIM BANKS, Indiana
+DONALD NORCROSS, New Jersey          JAMES COMER, Kentucky
+PRAMILA JAYAPAL, Washington          RUSS FULCHER, Idaho
+JOSEPH D. MORELLE, New York          FRED KELLER, Pennsylvania
+SUSAN WILD, Pennsylvania             GREGORY F. MURPHY, North Carolina
+LUCY Mc BATH, Georgia                MARIANNETTE MILLER-MEEKS, Iowa
+JAHANA HAYES, Connecticut            BURGESS OWENS, Utah
+ANDY LEVIN, Michigan                 BOB GOOD, Virginia
+ILHAN OMAR, Minnesota                LISA C. Mc CLAIN, Michigan
+HALEY M. STEVENS, Michigan           DIANA HARSHBARGER, Tennessee
+TERESA LEGER FERNANDEZ, New Mexico   MARY E. MILLER, Illinois
+MONDAIRE JONES, New York             VICTORIA SPARTZ, Indiana
+KATHY E. MANNING, North Carolina     SCOTT FITZGERALD, Wisconsin
+FRANK J. MRVAN, Indiana              MADISON CAWTHORN, North Carolina
+JAMAAL BOWMAN, New York, Vice-Chair  MICHELLE STEEL, California
+MARK POCAN, Wisconsin                Vacancy
+JOAQUIN CASTRO, Texas                Vacancy
+MIKIE SHERRILL, New Jersey
+JOHN A. YARMUTH, Kentucky
+ADRIANO ESPAILLAT, New York
+KWEISI MFUME, Maryland
+
+                   Veronique Pluviose, Staff Director
+                  Cyrus Artz, Minority Staff Director
+                                 ------                                
+
+       SUBCOMMITTEE ON HIGHER EDUCATION AND WORKFORCE INVESTMENT
+
+                FREDERICA S. WILSON, Florida, Chairwoman
+
+MARK TAKANO, California              GREGORY F. MURPHY, North Carolina
+PRAMILA JAYAPAL, Washington            Ranking Member
+ILHAN OMAR, Minnesota                GLENN GROTHMAN, Wisconsin
+TERESA LEGER FERNANDEZ, New Mexico   ELISE M. STEFANIK, New York
+MONDAIRE JONES, New York             JIM BANKS, Indiana
+KATHY E. MANNING, North Carolina     JAMES COMER, Kentucky
+JAMAAL BOWMAN, New York              RUSS FULCHER, Idaho
+MARK POCAN, Wisconsin                MARIANNETTE MILLER-MEEKS, Iowa
+JOAQUIN CASTRO, Texas                BOB GOOD, Virginia
+MIKIE SHERRILL, New Jersey           LISA C. Mc CLAIN, Michigan
+ARIANO ESPAILLAT, New York           DIANA HARSHBARGER, Tennessee
+RAUL M. GRIJALVA, Arizona            VICTORIA SPARTZ, Indiana
+JOE COURTNEY, Connecticut            Vacancy
+SUZANNE BONAMICI, Oregon             VIRGINIA FOXX, North Carolina (ex 
+ROBERT C. ``BOBBY'' SCOTT, Virginia      officio)
+  (ex officio)
+                            
+                            C O N T E N T S
+
+                              ----------                              
+                                                                   Page
+
+Hearing held on March 17, 2021...................................     1
+
+Statement of Members:
+    Wilson, Hon. Frederica S., Chairwoman, Subcommittee on 
+      Education and Workforce Investment.........................     1
+        Prepared statement of....................................     5
+     Murphy, Hon. Gregory F., Ranking Member, Subcommittee on 
+      Education and Workforce Investment.........................     6
+        Prepared statement of....................................     8
+
+Statement of Witnesses:
+    Burke, Lindsey M., Ph.D., Director, Center for Education 
+      Policy, and Mark A. Kolokotrones Fellow in Education, The 
+      Heritage Foundation, Washington, DC........................    19
+        Prepared statement of....................................    22
+    Oakley, Eloy Ortiz, Chancellor, California Community 
+      Colleges,
+      Sacramento, CA.............................................    14
+        Prepared statement of....................................    17
+    Thornton, Keith, Student, Florida International University, 
+      Miami, FL..................................................    11
+        Prepared statement of....................................    13
+    Zibel, Daniel A., Vice President and Chief Counsel, National 
+      Student Legal Defense Network, Washington, DC..............    29
+        Prepared statement of....................................    31
+
+Additional Submissions:
+    Bonamici, Hon. Suzanne, a Representative in Congress from the 
+      State of Oregon:
+        Report dated May 19, 2020 from the Brookings Institution, 
+
+          ``Commercials for College? Advertising in Higher 
+          Education''............................................    86
+    Jones, Hon. Mondaire, a Representative in Congress from the 
+      State of New York:
+        Report dated October, 2020 from National Student Legal 
+          Defense, ``Protection and the Unseen: Holding 
+          Executives Personally Liable under the Higher Eduction 
+          Act''..................................................   109
+    Leger Fernandez, Hon. Teresa, a Representative in Congress 
+      from the State of New Mexico:
+        Article dated March 16, 2021 from the Santa Fe Reporter: 
+          New Mexico College Students Face Food Insecurity''.....   106
+        Link: GAO Report 19-95 dated December 21, 2018, ``FOOD 
+          INSECURITY: Better Information Could Help Eligible 
+          College 
+          Students Access Federal Food Assistance Benefits''.....   108
+    Omar, Hon. Ilhan, a Representative in Congress from the State 
+      of 
+      Minnesota:
+        Link: GAO Report 19-522 dated August 19, 2020, ``Higher 
+          Education: More Information Could Help Student Parents 
+          Access Additional Federal Student Aid''................   106
+    Questions submitted for the record by:
+        Banks, Hon. Jim, a Representative in Congress from the 
+          State of Indiana.......................................   126
+        Fulcher, Hon. Russ, a a Representative in Congress from 
+          the State of Idaho.....................................   126
+        Harshbarger, Hon. Diana, a a Representative in Congress 
+          from the State of Tennessee............................ 126-7
+        Sherrill, Hon. Mikie, a Representative in Congress from 
+          the State of New Jersey 
+
+
+
+    Responses to questions submitted for the record by:
+        Dr. Burke................................................   128
+        Mr. Oakley...............................................   134
+        Mr. Zibel................................................   140
+
+ 
+ RISING TO THE CHALLENGE: THE FUTURE OF HIGHER EDUCATION POST COVID-19
+
+                              ----------                              
+
+
+                       Wednesday, March 17, 2021
+
+                  House of Representatives,
+                      Subcommittee on Education and
+                              Workforce Investment,
+                          Committee on Education and Labor,
+                                                    Washington, DC.
+    The subcommittee met, pursuant to notice, at 1:03 p.m., via 
+Zoom, Hon. Frederica Wilson (Chairwoman of the subcommittee) 
+presiding.
+    Present: Representatives Wilson, Takano, Jayapal, Omar, 
+Leger Fernandez, Jones, Manning, Bowman, Pocan, Castro, 
+Sherrill, Courtney, Bonamici, Scott (ex officio), Murphy, 
+Grothman, Banks, Comer, Fulcher, Miller-Meeks, Good, McClain, 
+Harshbarger, Spartz, and Foxx (ex officio).
+    Staff present: Tylease Alli, Chief Clerk; Katie Berger, 
+Profession Staff; Ilana Brunner, General Counsel; Sheila 
+Havenner, Director of Information Technology; Eli Hovland, 
+Policy Associate; Ariel Jones, Policy Associate; Andre Lindsay, 
+Policy Associate; Max Moore, Staff Assistant; Mariah Mowbray, 
+Clerk/Special Assistant to the Staff Director; Kayla 
+Pennebecker, Staff Assistant; Veronique Pluviose, Staff 
+Director; Benjamin Sinoff, Director of Education Oversight; 
+Banyon Vassar, Deputy Director of Information Technology; 
+Claire Viall, Professional Staff; Cyrus Artz, Minority Staff 
+Director; Kelsey Avino , Minority Professional Staff Member; 
+Courtney Butcher, Minority Director of Member Services and 
+Coalitions; Amy Raaf Jones, Minority Director of Education and 
+Human Resources Policy; Dean Johnson, Minority Legislative 
+Assistant; Hannah Matesic, Minority Director of Operations; 
+Carlton Norwood, Minority Press Secretary; Alex Ricci, Minority 
+Professional Staff Member; Chance Russell, Minority Legislative 
+Assistant; and Mandy Schaumburg, Minority Chief Counsel and 
+Deputy Director of Education Policy.
+    Chairwoman Wilson. The Subcommittee on Education and 
+Workforce Investment will come to order. I believe we have a 
+quorum call. We have a Member who is being waived on the 
+committee. He's not a Member of the committee, but after each 
+of the Members speak he will be able to participate.
+    I want to welcome everyone. I note that a quorum is 
+present, so that's great. Everybody is on time and ready. The 
+subcommittee is meeting today to hear testimony on the future 
+of higher education post COVID-19. And you will notice that 
+some of the women are wearing white. This is a special day for 
+us, this particular suffrage day.
+    This is an entirely remote hearing. All microphones will be 
+kept muted as a general rule to avoid unnecessary background 
+noise. Members and witnesses they'll be responsible for 
+unmuting themselves when they are recognized to speak, or when 
+they wish to seek recognition.
+    I also ask that Members please identify themselves before 
+they speak, so call out your name before you speak. Members 
+should keep their cameras on while in the proceeding. Members 
+shall be considered present in the proceeding when they are 
+visible on camera and they shall be considered not present when 
+they are not visible on camera.
+    The only exception to this is if they are experiencing 
+technical difficulty and inform committee Staff of such 
+difficulty. If any Member experiences technical difficulties 
+during the hearing you should stay connected on the platform, 
+make sure that you are muted, and use your phone to immediately 
+call the committee's IT director, whose number was provided to 
+you in advance.
+    Should the Chair experience technical difficulty I'll need 
+to stop. If I have to step away to vote on the floor 
+Representative Mark Takano as a Member of this subcommittee, or 
+another Majority Member of the subcommittee, if he is not 
+available, is hereby authorized to assume the gavel in the 
+Chair's absence.
+    This is an entirely remote hearing and as such the 
+committee's hearing room is officially closed. Members who 
+choose to sit with their individual devices in the hearing room 
+must wear headphones to avoid feedback, echoes, and distortion 
+resulting from sitting in the same room.
+    Members are also expected to adhere to social distancing 
+and safe healthcare guidelines, including the use of masks, 
+hand sanitizers, and wiping down their areas before and after 
+their presence in the hearing room.
+    In order to ensure that the committee's five-minute rule is 
+adhered to, staff will be keeping track of time using the 
+committee's field timer. The field timer will appear in its own 
+thumbnail picture and will be named 001_timer. There will be no 
+one minute remaining warning. The field timer will sound its 
+audio alarm when time is up.
+    Members and witnesses are asked to wrap up promptly when 
+their time has expired. While a roll call is not necessary to 
+establish a quorum in official proceedings conducted remotely 
+or with remote participation, the committee has made it a 
+practice whenever there is an official proceeding with remote 
+participation for the Clerk to call the roll and help make 
+clear who is present at the start of the proceeding.
+    Members should say their name before announcing they are 
+present. This helps the Clerk, and also helps those watching 
+the platform and the live stream who may experience a few 
+seconds delay.
+    At this time I ask the Clerk to call the roll.
+    The Clerk. Ms. Wilson?
+    Chairwoman Wilson. Ms. Wilson is here.
+    The Clerk. Mr. Takano?
+    Mr. Takano. Present.
+    The Clerk. Ms. Jayapal?
+    [No response.]
+    The Clerk. Ms. Omar?
+    [No response.]
+    The Clerk. Ms. Leger Fernandez?
+    Ms. Leger Fernandez. Ms. Leger Fernandez is here.
+    The Clerk. Mr. Jones?
+    Mr. Jones. Here.
+    The Clerk. Ms. Manning?
+    Ms. Manning. Ms. Manning is here.
+    The Clerk. Mr. Bowman?
+    Mr. Bowman. Mr. Bowman is here.
+    The Clerk. Mr. Pocan?
+    Mr. Pocan. Mark Pocan's here.
+    The Clerk. Ms. Sherill?
+    [No response.]
+    The Clerk. Mr. Espaillat?
+    [No response.]
+    The Clerk. Mr. Grijalva?
+    [No response.]
+    The Clerk. Mr. Courtney?
+    Mr. Courtney. Courtney's here.
+    The Clerk. Ms. Bonamici?
+    Ms. Bonamici. Ms. Bonamici's present.
+    The Clerk. Mr. Murphy?
+    Mr. Murphy. Murphy is present.
+    The Clerk. Mr. Grothman?
+    [No response.]
+    The Clerk. Ms. Stefanik?
+    [No response.]
+    The Clerk. Mr. Banks?
+    [No response.]
+    The Clerk. Mr. Comer?
+    [No response.]
+    The Clerk. Mr. Fulcher?
+    Mr. Fulcher. Fulcher's here.
+    The Clerk. Ms. Miller-Meeks?
+    [No response.]
+    The Clerk. Mr. Good?
+    Mr. Good. Good is here.
+    The Clerk. Ms. McClain?
+    [No response.]
+    The Clerk. Ms. Harshbarger?
+    Ms. Harshbarger. I'm present.
+    The Clerk. Ms. Spartz?
+    [No response.]
+    The Clerk. Chairwoman Wilson that concludes the roll call. 
+I just wanted to add in here thank you Cheryl, thanks.
+    Ms. Foxx. Madam Chair, this is Virginia Foxx. I am present 
+also and I love your hat today.
+    Chairwoman Wilson. Thank you. Thank you so much. Pursuant 
+to Committee Rules agency opening statements are limited to the 
+Chair and the Ranking Member. This allows us to hear from our 
+witnesses sooner and provide Members with adequate time to ask 
+questions.
+    I recognize myself now for the purpose of making an opening 
+statement. But before I do that I just have to say that I want 
+to welcome especially Keith Thornton. Keith is one of your 
+witnesses and you will hear from him shortly, but he is a 
+member of the 5,000 Role Models of Excellence Projects that I 
+have been bragging about to all of you for years, especially to 
+you Representative Foxx.
+    Now I didn't want my time to start until now. Today we meet 
+to examine the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on higher 
+education and what we can do to expand access to quality higher 
+education. I want to start by reaffirming a well-established 
+fact that the foundation of our work that a college degree is 
+the surest pathway to financial security and a rewarding 
+career.
+    That is why as a Miami Dade County School Board Member, I 
+led the creation of the 5,000 Role Models of Excellence 
+Project, an in-school mentoring and dropout prevention program 
+that has helped prepare thousands of black boys for higher 
+education and adulthood.
+    Unfortunately, the COVID 19 pandemic has created new 
+barriers to postsecondary degrees. Campus closures and the 
+abrupt transition to online platforms saved lives. But we know 
+that remote instruction has also made it harder for students 
+across the country to access and complete college.
+    These consequences have not been felt evenly. As with every 
+other facet of our society, Americans who entered the pandemic 
+with fewer resources were disproportionately impacted by the 
+disruption to in person instruction.
+    Research indicates that achievement gaps between black and 
+white students are wider in online classes than traditional 
+settings. And on campus resources that underserved students 
+normally rely on, like computer labs and reliable high speed 
+internet, are restricted while campuses are closed.
+    Now, fewer students--particularly fewer low-income students 
+and students of color are pursuing a higher education. Social, 
+psychological, and economic hardships have also forced many 
+students to drop out during the pandemic. And now we know 
+students who discontinue their education are more likely to 
+default on student loans, and less likely to re-enroll which 
+lowers their chances of increased lifetime earnings.
+    Institutions are also facing unprecedented state and local 
+budget shortfalls which have already caused drastic funding 
+cuts and cost more than 300,000 higher education jobs. In 
+addition, decreased enrollment and campus closures are eroding 
+schools' revenue.
+    For example, undergraduate enrollment at community colleges 
+is down 10 percent compared to before the pandemic. Consider 
+that when the pandemic started many institutions were still 
+recovering from state budget cuts made during the Great 
+Recession.
+    To address these challenges, Congress secured urgent 
+funding for higher education by passing three major relief 
+packages: The Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security 
+Act, or CARES Act; the Coronavirus Response and Relief 
+Supplemental Appropriations Act, and just last week the 
+American Rescue Plan.
+    This combined investment of more than 75 billion dollars 
+has helped our higher education system avert an existential 
+crisis. This relief is helping institutions maintain basic 
+operations, keep staff on payroll, and prepare for reopening 
+safely, and it is helping students avoid hunger, homelessness, 
+and other hardships.
+    Importantly, these relief packages also secured critical 
+funding for state and local governments, supporting our 
+nation's public institutions, the workers they employ, and the 
+communities they support.
+    While this relief may have saved our higher education 
+system from financial calamity, justice demands that the 
+Federal Government do more, far more, to address the 
+longstanding disparities that have been exacerbated by the 
+pandemic.
+    For example, as institution access COVID-19 relief funding, 
+we must strengthen institutional oversight to prevent waste and 
+protect students from predatory for-profit schools. These 
+institutions have a well-documented record of using taxpayer 
+dollars to target vulnerable students during economic 
+downturns, leaving them with worthless degrees and unreasonable 
+loans. We cannot allow history to repeat itself.
+    Congress must also take bold action to lower the cost of 
+college. It's too expensive. This includes creating a federal 
+and state partnership that incentivizes states to reinvest in 
+their public institutions and offer free community college. And 
+it includes expanding Pell Grants, the cornerstone of federal 
+student aid, and so that fewer students that have to take 
+take--fewer will have to take out student loans.
+    As the Subcommittee has already established, this pandemic 
+is not only testing our students and institutions. It is also 
+testing Congress's commitment to ensuring that all students 
+have access to safe, affordable, and quality education.
+    Today I look forward to discussing what we must do to rise 
+to that challenge. I want to thank our witnesses again, for 
+being with us and I now yield to the Ranking Member Mr. Murphy 
+for his opening statement. Mr. Murphy, Representative Murphy.
+    [The statement of Chairwoman Wilson follows:]
+
+  Statement of Hon. Frederica S. Wilson, Chairwoman, Subcommittee on 
+                   Education and Workforce Investment
+
+    Today, we meet to examine the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on 
+higher education and what we can do to expand access to quality higher 
+education.
+    I want to start by reaffirming a well-established fact at the 
+foundation of our work-that a college degree is the surest pathway to 
+financial security and a rewarding career.
+    That is why, as a Miami-Dade County School Board Member, I led the 
+creation of the 5,000 Role Models of Excellence Project, an in-school 
+mentoring and drop-out prevention program that has helped prepare 
+thousands of black boys for higher education and adulthood.
+    Unfortunately, the COVID-19 pandemic has created new barriers to a 
+postsecondary degree.
+    Campus closures and the abrupt transition to online platforms saved 
+lives. But we know that remote instruction has also made it harder for 
+students across the country to access and complete college.
+    These consequences have not been felt evenly. As with every other 
+facet of our society, Americans who entered the pandemic with fewer 
+resources were disproportionately impacted by the disruption to in-
+person instruction.
+    Research indicates that achievement gaps between Black and white 
+students are wider in online classes than traditional settings. And on-
+campus resources that underserved students normally rely on, like 
+computer labs and reliable high-speed internet, are restricted while 
+campuses are closed.
+    Now, fewer students-particularly fewer low-income students and 
+students of color-are pursuing a higher education at all.
+    Social, psychological, and economic hardships have also forced many 
+students to drop out during the pandemic. And we know students who 
+discontinue their education are more likely to default on student loans 
+and less likely to re-enroll, which lowers their chances of increased 
+lifetime earnings.
+    Institutions are also facing unprecedented State and local budget 
+shortfalls, which have already caused drastic funding cuts and cost 
+more than 300,000 higher education jobs. In addition, decreased 
+enrollment and campus closures are eroding schools' revenue. For 
+example, undergraduate enrollment at community colleges is down 10 
+percent compared to before the pandemic. Consider that, when the 
+pandemic started, many institutions were still recovering from State 
+budget cuts made during the Great Recession.
+    To address these challenges, Congress secured urgent funding for 
+higher education by passing three major relief packages:
+
+   the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security Act, or 
+        CARES Act,
+
+   the Coronavirus Response and Relief Supplemental 
+        Appropriations Act, and, just last week,
+
+   the American Rescue Plan Act.
+
+    This combined investment of more than $75 billion has helped our 
+higher education system avert an existential crisis. The relief is 
+helping institutions maintain basic operations, keep staff on payroll, 
+and prepare for reopening safely. And it is helping students avoid 
+hunger, homelessness, and other hardships.
+    Importantly, these relief packages also secured critical funding 
+for State and local governments, supporting our nation's public 
+institutions, the workers they employ, and the communities they 
+support.
+    While this relief may have saved our higher education system from 
+financial calamity, justice demands that the Federal Government do far 
+more to address the longstanding disparities that have been exacerbated 
+by the pandemic.
+    For example, as institutions access COVID-19 relief funding, we 
+must strengthen institutional oversight to prevent waste and protect 
+students from predatory for-profit schools. These institutions have a 
+well-documented record of using taxpayer dollars to target vulnerable 
+students during economic downturns, leaving them with worthless degrees 
+and unreasonable loans. We cannot allow history to repeat itself.
+    Congress must also take bold action to lower the cost of college. 
+This includes creating a Federal and State partnership that 
+incentivizes States to reinvest in their public institutions and offer 
+free community college. And it includes expanding Pell Grants, the 
+cornerstone of Federal student aid, so that fewer students have to take 
+out student loans.
+    As the subcommittee has already established, this pandemic is not 
+only testing our students and institutions. It is also testing 
+Congress's commitment to ensuring that all students have access to 
+safe, affordable, and quality education.
+    Today, I look forward to discussing what we must do to rise to that 
+challenge.
+    I want to thank our witnesses, again, for being with us and I now 
+yield to the Ranking Member, Mr. Murphy, for his opening Statement.
+                                 ______
+                                 
+    Mr. Murphy. Thank you, Chairwoman Wilson. I appreciate the 
+opportunity. I love your hat also and I look forward to the 
+opportunity of working with you. I enjoyed our conversation the 
+other day. I think we have so much common ground to work on. I 
+could not agree with you more that individuals and minorities 
+and rural communities have been disproportionately affected by 
+this because of school closures, all of the more reason to get 
+our kids back in school.
+    America's higher education system has been in desperate 
+reform for years. The systems weaknesses were further 
+exacerbated by this pandemic. There are many pathways to 
+success besides the traditional Baccalaureate degree, and 
+institutions opposed to secondary education need to realize 
+that fact if they hope to have the students thrive in the 
+coming decades.
+    I could not also Chairwoman, agree with you more about the 
+affordability of colleges. They've gone unchecked without 
+reducing costs for years and I look forward to working with you 
+on that, nothing specific. We're not here today to discuss 
+whether higher education needs reform, as I think everybody on 
+this committee agrees so.
+    According to one analysis, four in ten Baccalaureate degree 
+recipients are underemployed in their first jobs after school, 
+and roughly 60 percent of students it takes at least six years 
+to complete their degree program. Certainly, these numbers are 
+not worth celebrating.
+    Now is not the time to expand on policies that have failed 
+us from government before. And while Congress does play a role 
+in improving all forms of postsecondary education, it should 
+not take the form of expensive government handouts that push 
+unworkable partisan priorities, and priorities that have shown 
+that government has led to the increased cost of education.
+    When COVID-19 placed heavy strains on our higher education 
+system Congress acted quickly to provide the necessary funding 
+for educational institutions to combat this once in a century, 
+and hopefully, once in a much longer-term pandemic.
+    Under President Trump, Congress allocated 35 billion 
+dollars, that's 35 with a B towards these efforts. Republicans 
+do not take spending taxpayer dollars lightly, which is why my 
+Republican colleagues voted against the Democrat led budget 
+reconciliation bill.
+    We wanted to help people, but unfortunately this was pushed 
+before unilateral with a large spending bill. But these 
+unprecedented levels of taxpayer money being funneled into 
+educational institutions, combined with valid concerns about 
+return on investment. It is imperative that Congress take a 
+close look at how the Department of Education and institutions 
+of higher learning spend hard earned taxpayer dollars, and 
+consider necessary structural reform to the Higher Education 
+Act to serve students better.
+    I'm disappointed that we're not going into this further, 
+and this hearing is seemingly having a lack of actual and 
+necessary oversight because I believe that is our purpose. We 
+have a responsibility to diligently and responsibly allocate 
+taxpayer dollars to those who truly need assistance. Too many 
+on this committee find it too easy to spend hard earned 
+taxpayer dollars without promising accountability.
+    I have no problem with us investing in our students, but we 
+have to hold institutions accountable. As a committee our 
+loyalty should be to all students, present and future. Any 
+conversations surrounding postsecondary education must aim to 
+reduce the cost of attendance, and boost graduation rates while 
+at the same time supporting students to pursue the type of 
+education that works for them. It is not a one size fits all.
+    And that means whether it be seeking a Baccalaureate 
+degree, or pursuing an equally valuable skill based 
+alternative, such as a career in technical education or 
+apprenticeships that lead to in demand good paying jobs.
+    Before the pandemic, there were over 7 million unfilled 
+jobs in the United States, in part due to a skills gap. With 
+employers in desperate need for qualified employees, now is the 
+time more than ever, to strengthen all learning opportunities 
+that provide students with skills and the necessary knowledge 
+to succeed in the workforce.
+    This type of strategy will not only benefit students, but 
+will boost our entire economy. Higher education is in a state 
+of emergency, but we cannot allow this to turn into an excuse 
+to nationalize the entire postsecondary education system. The 
+U.S. Constitution grants no authority over education to the 
+Federal Government. Education is not mentioned in the 
+Constitution and for a good reason.
+    The founders wanted most aspects of our lives to be managed 
+by those closest to them, either by State, or local or by 
+family, businesses, and other elements of society. Certainly, 
+they saw no role for the Federal Government in education.
+    Now if we're going to be involved in education, we ought to 
+expect specific financial and productive return on our 
+investment and not put students into oblivion of debt. 
+Committee Republicans are focused on supporting students and 
+completing affordable, postsecondary education that will 
+prepare them to enter the workforce with the skills that they 
+need for life long learning, and life long success.
+    We ought to work together, and I mean collaboration, to 
+give students access to educational options that will prepare 
+them to enter the workforce with the skills they need for that 
+lifelong success. Students need pathways, not partisanship, and 
+it is my hope and my expectation that this is a step in a 
+productive and a bipartisan direction.
+    Again thank you all for being here. I look forward to 
+discussing reforms for higher education that increase student 
+access without expensive government handouts, partisan 
+programs. And I want to thank the Chairwoman for a wonderful 
+discussion. As I said next week I look forward to working on 
+trying to do great things for our students in education, and 
+provide all students with a wonderful means of pathway to 
+success. Thank you, and I will yield back.
+    [The statement of Ranking Member Murphy follows:]
+
+ Statement of Hon. Gregory F. Murphy, Ranking Member, Subcommittee on 
+                   Education and Workforce Investment
+
+    Thank you, Madam Chair and thank you to all our witnesses for 
+joining us here today.
+    America's higher education system has been in desperate need of 
+reform for years. The system's weaknesses were further exacerbated by 
+the COVID-19 pandemic. There are many pathways to success besides the 
+traditional baccalaureate degree, and institutions of postsecondary 
+education need to realize this fact if they hope to help their students 
+thrive in the coming decades.
+    We are not here today to discuss whether higher education needs 
+reform, as both sides can agree that the system needs work. According 
+to one analysis, four in ten baccalaureate-degree recipients are 
+underemployed in their first jobs after school. Roughly 60 percent of 
+students complete their degree program within 6 years. Certainly, these 
+are not numbers worth celebrating.
+    Now is not the time to expand on failed, big government policies. 
+While Congress has a role to play in improving all forms of 
+postsecondary education, it should not take the form of expensive 
+government handouts that push unworkable, partisan priorities.
+    When COVID-19 placed heavy strains on our higher education system, 
+Congress acted quickly to provide the necessary funding for educational 
+institutions to combat this once-in-a-century pandemic. Under President 
+Trump, Congress allocated roughly $35 billion toward these efforts. 
+That is 35 billion with a b.
+    Republicans do not take spending taxpayers' dollars lightly, which 
+is why my Republican colleagues voted against the Democrats' budget 
+reconciliation bill. Unfortunately, Democrats unilaterally pushed ahead 
+with their large spending bill.
+    With these unprecedented levels of taxpayer money being funneled 
+into educational institutions, combined with valid concerns about 
+return on investment, it is imperative that Congress take a close look 
+at how the Department of Education and institutions of higher learning 
+spent hard-earned taxpayer dollars, and consider necessary structural 
+reforms to the Higher Education Act to serve students better. I am 
+disappointed that this hearing seems to have a glaring lack of actual 
+and necessary oversight.
+    We have a responsibility to diligently and responsibly allocate 
+taxpayer dollars to those who truly need assistance. Too many in this 
+Committee find it way too easy to spend hard-earned taxpayer dollars 
+without promising accountability. As a Committee, our loyalty should be 
+to all students, present and future.
+    Any conversation surrounding postsecondary education must aim to 
+reduce the cost of attendance and boost graduation rates, while also 
+supporting students to pursue the type of education that works for 
+them--whether it be seeking a baccalaureate degree or pursuing equally 
+valuable, skills-based alternatives, such as career and technical 
+education and apprenticeships, that lead to in-demand, good-paying 
+jobs.
+    Before the pandemic, there were over seven million unfilled jobs in 
+the U.S., in part due to a skills gap. With employers in desperate need 
+for qualified employees, now is the time to strengthen all learning 
+opportunities that provide students with the skills and knowledge 
+necessary to succeed in the work force.
+    This type of strategy will not only benefit students but will boost 
+our entire economy.
+    Higher education is in a State of emergency, but we cannot allow 
+this to turn into an excuse to nationalize the entire postsecondary 
+education sector. The U.S. Constitution grants no authority over 
+education to the Federal Government. Education is not mentioned in the 
+Constitution of the United States, and for good reason. The Founders 
+wanted most aspects of life managed by those who were closest to them, 
+either by State or local government or by families, businesses, and 
+other elements of civil society. Certainly, they saw no role for the 
+Federal Government in education. Now, if we are going to be involved in 
+education, we ought to expect a civic, financial, and productive return 
+on our investment.
+    Committee Republicans are focused on supporting students in 
+completing an affordable postsecondary education that will prepare them 
+to enter the work force with the skills they need for lifelong success.
+    We ought to work together--and I mean actual collaboration--to give 
+students access to education options that will prepare them to enter 
+the work force with the skills they need for lifelong success. Students 
+need pathways not partisanship.
+    It is my hope that this hearing is a step in the productive and 
+bipartisan direction. Again, thank you all for being here, and I look 
+forward to discussing reforms to higher education that increase student 
+success without expensive government handouts
+                                 ______
+                                 
+    Chairwoman Wilson. Without objection, all of the Members 
+who wish to insert written statements into the record may do so 
+by submitting them to the Committee Clerk electronically in 
+Microsoft Word format by 5:00 p.m. on March 31, 2021.
+    I will now introduce the witnesses. Keith Thornton, Jr., is 
+a senior at Florida International University, FIU, where he's 
+majoring in recreation and sports management. Keith is a 5000 
+Role Models of Excellence Project Wilson Scholar in an 
+educational talent search TRIO program alum, and he is a Pell 
+Grant recipient.
+    During the COVID-19 pandemic Keith received emergency 
+financial aid from both the CARES Act and CERTIA, which helped 
+him stay afloat. I am pleased to recognize my colleague 
+Representative Mark Takano to briefly introduce his constituent 
+who is appearing before us as a witness today. Representative 
+Mr. Takano, do I see you?
+    Mr. Takano. Thank you, Chair Wilson. It's my distinct honor 
+to welcome Chancellor Eloy Ortiz Oakley, who is Chancellor of 
+the California Community College system. Mr. Oakley was 
+appointed Chancellor for the California Community Colleges in 
+2016, and is best known throughout California and the Nation 
+for implementing innovative programs and policies that help 
+students succeed in college.
+    One of the most exciting developments in California Madam 
+Chair, is the use of alternatives to testing to actually place 
+students into college level classes and avoid unnecessary 
+remediation. This has huge implications for diversifying----
+    [Audio difficulties]
+    Mr. Vassar. Chairwoman Wilson, I believe Mr. Takano's 
+connection became severed possibly.
+    Chairwoman Wilson. All right. So I'd like to welcome 
+Chancellor Eloy Ortiz Oakley as a witness. Welcome. It's a 
+pleasure to have you here today. The Chancellor was appointed 
+for the California Community Colleges in 2016, and is best 
+known throughout California and the Nation for implementing 
+innovative programs and policies that help students succeed in 
+college.
+    Prior to becoming Chancellor Mr. Oakley was a 
+Superintendent President of the Long Beach Community College 
+District. After serving in the U.S. Army, Chancellor Oakley 
+began his education at a community college, first enrolling at 
+Golden West College and then transferring to the University of 
+California Irvine where he received a bachelor of arts in 
+environmental analysis and design and master of business 
+administration. Welcome.
+    Our next witness is Daniel Zibel. He is the Vice President 
+and Chief Counsel and co-founder of the National Student Legal 
+Defense Network. Mr. Zibel is an expert on consumer protection 
+and higher education and leads Student Defense Network to 
+ensure that student loan borrowers can access the courts to 
+assert their rights against predatory loan servicing practices.
+    Prior to joining Student Defense, Dan served as a Deputy 
+Assistant General Counsel for post-secondary education at the 
+Department of Education where he served as the lead legal 
+counsel to the enforcement unit at Federal student aid, and on 
+the Obama administration's interagency task force on foreign 
+project education.
+    Mr. Zibel has a Bachelor of Arts in Political Science from 
+Haverford College and a law degree from the University of 
+Michigan Law School. Welcome.
+    Next Ms. Lindsey Burke is a Director of the Center for 
+Education Policy and Mark A. Kolokotrones Fellow in Education. 
+Lindsey Burke oversees the Heritage Foundation's research and 
+policy on issues pertaining to pre-school, K-12, and higher 
+education reform.
+    She also serves as a fellow with EdChoice, the Legacy 
+Foundation of Milton and Rose Friedman and is on the National 
+Advisory Board of Learn4Life, a network of public charter 
+schools. Is on the board of the Educational Freedom Institute, 
+and serves on the Board of Choice Media.
+    Ms. Burke holds a bachelor's degree in politics from 
+Hollins University, a master of teaching degree from the 
+University of Virginia, and a Ph.D. in education policy from 
+George Mason University.
+    These are my instructions to you as witnesses. We 
+appreciate your participation today, and we look forward to 
+your testimony. Let me remind you that we have read your 
+written statements, and they will appear in full in the hearing 
+record. Pursuant to Committee Rule 8(d) and committee practice, 
+each of you is asked to limit your oral presentation to a five-
+minute summary of your written statement.
+    I also remind you as witnesses that pursuant to Title 18 of 
+the U.S. Code, Section 1001, it is illegal--illegal, to 
+knowingly and willfully falsify any statement, representation, 
+writing, document, or material fact presented to Congress or 
+otherwise conceal or cover up a material fact.
+    Before you begin your testimony please remember to unmute 
+your microphone. During your testimony staff will be keeping 
+track of time, and a timer will sound when time is up. Please 
+be attentive to the time. Wrap up when your time is over, and 
+re mute your microphone.
+    If any of you experience technical difficulties during your 
+testimony, or later in the hearing, you should stay connected 
+on the platform, but make sure you are muted, and use your 
+phone to immediately call the IT director whose number was 
+provided to you in advance.
+    We will let all of the witnesses make their presentations 
+before we move to Member questions. When answering a question 
+please remember to unmute your microphone. I will first 
+recognize my friend and son, Keith Thornton from Florida 
+International University. Keith.
+
+  STATEMENT OF KEITH THORNTON, STUDENT, FLORIDA INTERNATIONAL 
+                           UNIVERSITY
+
+    Mr. Thornton. Good afternoon everyone. Again my name is 
+Keith Thornton, Junior. Chairman Member Wilson, Ranking Member 
+Murphy, Members of the subcommittee, thank you for allowing me 
+to testify today. I value the opportunity to come before you on 
+behalf of all students across the Nation whose educations have 
+been disrupted by the pandemic and who have relied on emergency 
+aid to remain financially afloat and continue pursuing their 
+degree.
+    The fact that my experience during this challenging period 
+is in many ways not unique is a testament to the severity of 
+this crisis, and the ongoing need for Federal relief.
+    I am a senior at Florida International University studying 
+recreation and sports management. And since my freshman year, I 
+have benefited from the support of fellow students, teachers, 
+and positive campus environment. This support network has been 
+critical to helping me remain focused and weather many of the 
+challenges that have arisen in the past year.
+    I am also a proud graduate of the South Florida TRIO 
+Program, which enabled me to form long-lasting relationships 
+with instructors and students who have been a consistent source 
+of motivation. My program instructor, Ms. Tiffany Tyler, 
+regularly checks in with me and checks in with my family to see 
+if everything is going well with us. And there was a point in 
+time where I was even contemplating whether or not college was 
+for me.
+    And in the end I was able to go to my peers within the 
+program and they were encouraging me to continue pushing 
+through and now I'm in a position where I'm getting ready to 
+graduate. And Ms. Tiffany Tyler and others provided the 
+guidance and mentorship that I needed to not only continue my 
+education, but to also enjoy it.
+    In the past year, these supportive relationships have been 
+more important than ever. When the pandemic hit, my education 
+was disrupted. I had to suspend my internship, and I lost my 
+job. I had been working for about 2 months before the start of 
+the semester, which enabled me to move into an apartment and 
+forego taking out an additional loan and having to stay on 
+campus.
+    And losing that income was a heavy blow, so it was a great 
+relief when a few weeks later I received emergency funds from 
+FIU that were made available through the CARES Act. And this 
+aid helped me purchase school supplies and even keep up with 
+bills, whether it was rent, or anything concerning my car 
+because I had to travel.
+    Without that financial support, I would have been forced to 
+jeopardize my future by taking out more loans that I initially 
+hadn't planned for. The second round of aid that I received 
+through the Coronavirus Response and Relief Supplemental 
+Appropriations Act has similarly provided a lifeline that gave 
+me the opportunity to continue my studies without added 
+financial stress.
+    This has been critically important because even without 
+having to worry about replacing the income I lost when my job 
+ended, it has been challenging to remain focused on my studies. 
+And although I haven't allowed myself to become discouraged, or 
+to give up, COVID-19 has had a huge effect on my ability to 
+stay motivated.
+    I struggled with the transition of virtual learning and not 
+having the same support network around me. Without the presence 
+of my peers and teachers, I felt more alone and forced to rely 
+on my own strength.
+    Still, it has been my relationships with mentors, 
+counselors, and other students that have enabled me to remain 
+on track. And with their continued support, and thanks to the 
+emergency financial aid I received, I look forward to 
+graduating as soon as this summer.
+    I would like to thank the Members of this committee for 
+thinking of students across the United States who, like me, 
+suddenly had to take on unexpected costs when the pandemic hit, 
+and for delivering meaningful relief.
+    I would also urge you to continue to provide support for 
+students who are most in need. We represent the future, and I, 
+like many of my counterparts, want to use our degrees to make 
+an impact. Although Florida tuition rates have remained flat 
+for eight years, many students would benefit from an effort 
+double the Pell considering the significant financial burden 
+that exists on us and our families.
+    Receiving financial aid that removes some of this strain 
+helps put students in a position to thrive. And as its name 
+implies, FIU has an international focus, and I want to also 
+speak to the importance of ensuring that international students 
+have the same opportunities to succeed.
+    They are pursuing the same dreams and have in many cases 
+been equally impacted by the pandemic. So I want to thank you 
+for the opportunity to speak here today, and I look forward to 
+answering any questions you may have. Thank you.
+    [The prepared statement of Mr. Thornton follows:]
+
+                  Prepared Statement of Keith Thornton
+[GRAPHICS NOT AVAILABLE IN TIFF FORMAT]
+
+
+    Chairwoman Wilson. Thank you so much Keith, thank you. We 
+will now hear from Chancellor Eloy Ortiz Oakley. Chancellor.
+
+    STATEMENT OF CHANCELLOR ELOY ORTIZ OAKLEY, CHANCELLOR, 
+                 CALIFORNIA COMMUNITY COLLEGES
+
+    Mr. Oakley. Well good afternoon everyone. And Chair Wilson, 
+Ranking Member Murphy, and Members of the subcommittee my name 
+is Eloy Ortiz Oakley. I'm a proud community college transfer 
+student, and I'm pleased to serve as the Chancellor of the 
+California Community Colleges.
+    I'm honored to speak to you today on the future of higher 
+education, as we look to the end finally, of the COVID-19 
+pandemic. My remarks will focus on how our community colleges 
+are supporting our students to stay enrolled and complete their 
+studies, and how an effective partnership with Congress and the 
+Federal Government can lead to an equitable recovery by 
+investing in higher education and supporting the displaced 
+workers ravaged by this pandemic.
+    First, let me tell you a little bit about the California 
+Community Colleges. We are the largest and most diverse system 
+of higher education in the Nation with 116 colleges serving 
+more than 2 million students in urban, suburban, and rural 
+communities. They are the primary pathway to educational and 
+economic mobility for Californians, and we are proud to serve 
+the top 100 percent of our students.
+    Like much of the Nation 1 year ago today, our State went 
+into an immediate lockdown to ensure the health and safety of 
+our workers, families, and students. Our colleges are--I want 
+first commend Governor Gavin Newsom for his swift and decisive 
+action. Our colleges also acted decisively.
+    In a matter of weeks our faculty and college leaders 
+mobilized to convert tens of thousands of courses and programs 
+to an online, or remote modality. The support of Congress has 
+been critical to our system, and our students during this 
+critical moment.
+    The funds provided by the CARES Act were used, among other 
+things to help our diverse students purchase things like 
+laptops, Wi-Fi hotspots, and as emergency financial aid to 
+students who lost their jobs, in many cases were struggling to 
+find their next meal, or stave off eviction.
+    As we look to the future of higher education, the most 
+important task is to ensure that students can attend, and 
+afford the total cost of college. As no doubt you have heard, 
+community colleges have seen a sudden and alarming decrease in 
+enrollments since the start of the pandemic.
+    We believe that this is due to many factors, foremost among 
+them being that our students, they balance multiple 
+responsibilities. They are parents. Primary breadwinners. They 
+balance multiple jobs, and they share the same Wi-Fi with a 
+full household and are facing--many of them are facing 
+homelessness and other challenges.
+    The economic devastation brought by the COVID pandemic has 
+hit our lowest income students the hardest. We are appreciative 
+of the ongoing discussions about tuition free community college 
+and would note that California provides nearly three billion 
+dollars in student financial aid to waive tuition for low 
+income students attending community colleges and four-year 
+universities.
+    However, the cost of college goes beyond tuition. It 
+includes textbooks, supplies such as laptops, housing, food, 
+transportation and child care. We have used funds from the 
+stimulus legislation passed by Congress to provide direct 
+emergency one-time assistance to our most vulnerable students.
+    We need stable, permanent system of student financial aid 
+that acknowledges the true costs of attending college. This is 
+true not just in California, but across the country where the 
+movement to double the Federal Pell is gaining momentum, and we 
+are pleased to support this effort.
+    Our commitment is two-fold--increasing financial aid for 
+students to cover non-tuition related expenses, and scaling 
+those additional student supports that they need to complete 
+their education. Additionally, financial support is needed to 
+ensure equitable broad-band access for all.
+    High-speed internet is not a luxury. If anything, what we 
+have learned from this pandemic is that every American 
+household must have access to reliable high-speed broadband. I 
+also believe the community college training programs are 
+critical to preparing America's workforce, and ensuring an 
+equitable recovery. California's workforce programs, including 
+those funded by the Federal Perkins Career Technical Education 
+Program match, employers and high-skill, high-wage industries 
+with educated and qualified workers.
+    We strongly encourage these programs that provide new 
+pathways to secure employment and that pay a living wage. I 
+believe that we should place an emphasis of community college 
+programs that focus on the skills and competencies workers need 
+to get back into the workforce in a meaningful way.
+    We also further support oversight of the for-profit 
+industry. We thank Congress for including the America Rescue 
+Plan Act language that strengthens the 90/10 rule which helps 
+hold for-profits accountable for their reliance on Federal aid 
+dollars.
+    Finally, congressional action is needed to support our 
+undocumented students. This is not a partisan issue for us. 
+This is a moral and economic imperative. Undocumented students 
+are our future teachers, business owners, doctors and 
+entrepreneurs. We urge Congress to codify the deferred action 
+for childhood arrivals program.
+    I will close by adding that with regard to equity higher 
+education now is the time to double down on efforts to insure 
+that students have the supports they need to be successful, 
+whether they're in California, middle America, or the Atlantic 
+Coast. I'm proud to represent a State that leads with equity at 
+the center of everything we do. We cannot do this alone. 
+Ongoing Federal support, a partnership with the Biden 
+administration, leaders of this subcommittee and the entire 
+Congress are needed to make this happen.
+    I thank you for the time. I'm honored to be here today, and 
+I look forward to answering your questions.
+    [The prepared statement of Mr. Oakley follows:]
+
+                Prepared statement of Eloy Ortiz Oakley
+[GRAPHICS NOT AVAILABLE IN TIFF FORMAT]
+
+    Chairwoman Wilson. Thank you so much. We will now hear from 
+Lindsey Burke.
+
+STATEMENT OF DR. LINDSEY M. BURKE, Ph.D., DIRECTOR, CENTER FOR 
+EDUCATION POLICY, AND MARK A. KOLOKOTRONES FELLOW IN EDUCATION, 
+                    THE HERITAGE FOUNDATION
+
+    Ms. Burke. Good afternoon. My name is Lindsey Burke. I am a 
+Mark A. Kolokotrones Fellow in Education and the Director of 
+the Center for Education Policy at the Heritage Foundation.
+    Thank you Chairwoman Scott and Chairwoman Foxx and thank 
+you subcommittee Chairwoman Wilson and Ranking Member Murphy 
+for the opportunity to testify today.
+    COVID-19 has posed challenges to every aspect of education 
+in America from preschool through college. But it has also 
+presented opportunities to rethink whether the current higher 
+education system is serving students in the best way possible, 
+and whether there are opportunities for reform.
+    The congressional response to COVID-19 has now included 
+three major aid packages. As part of the CARES Act passed in 
+March 2020, higher education received 14 billion dollars in 
+additional Federal funding on top of the sector's standard 
+annual appropriations.
+    That was followed by another 22.7 billion dollars in new 
+funding as part of the December 2020 package. And then by the 
+most recent American Rescue Plan Act which will provide yet 
+another 40 billion to the higher education sector. In all, 
+colleges will have received an additional 76 billion dollars in 
+Federal spending over the past 12 months alone--a monumental 
+sum, nearly equivalent to the Department of Education's entire 
+annual discretionary budget.
+    Colleges should now take the opportunity to make sure that 
+that money is used responsibly. College boards of trustees and 
+regents need to direct their universities to tackle program 
+prioritization and reinvest funds in programs that advance 
+their core mission rather than continuing to engage in a 
+facilities and amenities arms race.
+    From 2001 to 2011 the number of non-teaching employees and 
+administrators increased 50 percent faster than teaching 
+faculty. At the same time the 6-year completion rate for 
+students pursuing a bachelor's degree stood at just 60 percent 
+in 2020. One-third of college graduates are underemployed, 
+working in jobs that do not require a bachelor's degree, and 
+business leaders also report that college courses do not 
+prepare graduates for the workforce, or provide them with the 
+practical or technical skills needed to be successful in their 
+careers.
+    Schools should focus resources on teaching and learning and 
+should evaluate productivity by assessing and prioritizing 
+academic programs that really reinforce their core mission and 
+prepare students for the workforce or further academic study. 
+The colleges and universities should also review facilities and 
+amenities expenditures and auxiliary services such as dining 
+services and student housing, janitorial services, and consider 
+outsourcing delivery and management of these functions which 
+are unrelated to their core mission as academic institutions.
+    And for its part Congress should not lose sight of the tens 
+of billions in new relief funding now that it has been 
+appropriated, and should make sure the Department of Education 
+is providing timely and useful oversight of how colleges are 
+spending that money.
+    Congress should also rescind the elastic clause of the HEA 
+prohibiting creditors from using their title for keeping 
+authority to impose onerous regulations on institutions. And 
+Federal policymakers should make space for private lending to 
+re-emerge and for innovative education financing options to 
+flourish by reducing Federal subsidies, including eliminating 
+the Federal PLUS Loan program, both the parent PLUS and grad 
+PLUS components.
+    And finally, Federal officials should allow colleges to 
+limit student borrowing. Currently, colleges are barred from 
+assessing a student's likelihood of repaying a loan based on 
+that student's course of study or borrowing history. Although 
+these factors can predict a student's ability to repay their 
+loans, colleges are not allowed to limit the amount students 
+can borrow.
+    Congress should amend the HEA to allow colleges to limit 
+borrowing, helping students to exit school with lower levels of 
+debt. Colleges and universities across the country do face 
+challenges associated with the COVID-19 pandemic, but so does 
+nearly every sector of society. Ever increasing Federal 
+spending and subsidies will not correct problems that have 
+plagued the higher education sector for decades, and which 
+predated the Coronavirus.
+    Congress should take this opportunity to pursue reforms 
+that will help colleges navigate the pandemic, while also 
+increasing their value proposition moving forward thank you.
+    [The prepared statement of Ms. Burke follows:]
+
+                 Prepared statement of Lindsey M. Burke
+[GRAPHICS NOT AVAILABLE IN TIFF FORMAT]
+
+
+    Chairwoman Wilson. Thank you so much for your testimony. 
+Finally, we will hear from Daniel Zibel, welcome.
+
+  STATEMENT OF MR. DANIEL A. ZIBEL, VICE PRESIDENT AND CHIEF 
+        COUNSEL, NATIONAL STUDENT LEGAL DEFENSE NETWORK
+
+    Mr. Zibel. Good afternoon Madam Chair Wilson, Ranking 
+Member Murphy and Members of the committee. I am the Vice 
+President and Chief Counsel of Student Defense. We use 
+litigation and advocacy to bring change for students on issues 
+of consumer protection and higher education.
+    I want to thank you for having me here today. As we all 
+know beyond the health effects and tragic losses of this past 
+year, the Coronavirus has fundamentally altered so many aspects 
+of American lives. With respect to higher education there have 
+been enormous impacts on students, perspective students, 
+families, study loan borrowers and repayment, recent graduates, 
+or those who left school without a credential at all.
+    COVID has exacerbated economic problems, including growing 
+disparities in a system of higher education that has benefited 
+so many, but has left so many others particularly in 
+communities of color with long-lasting, negative effects.
+    We are seeing signs now of an enrollment resurgence at for-
+profit colleges. Although overall, post-secondary enrollment 
+decline in the fall of 2020, enrollment at for-profit colleges 
+actually increased. This trend is similar to what happened 
+around the Great Recession, and is worrisome in light of the 
+overwhelming evidence that students who attend for-profit 
+colleges have worse outcomes at large than their peers at 
+public or non-profit institutions.
+    Thankfully, the U.S. Department of Education has ample 
+tools to make sure that taxpayer funded student loans and 
+grants are not propping up predatory institutions while leaving 
+students with mountains of debt and worthless degrees. This 
+spring marks the 30th anniversary of a bipartisan report by the 
+Senate Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations, which offered 
+a scathing review of the department's oversight mechanisms and 
+led to bipartisan legislation that gave the department many of 
+the oversight tools it has today.
+    So at a time when the needs of students and borrowers are 
+so pressing, the department is not effectively using the tools 
+that Congress provided to ensure that colleges are best serving 
+students and taxpayers. For example, on the heels of the 1991 
+report, Congress sought to ensure that taxpayers were protected 
+when colleges failed their students.
+    Because taxpayers can be on the hook for hundreds of 
+millions of dollars when an institution closes or defrauds its 
+students, Congress authorized the department to recover 
+financial losses, not only from institutions themselves, but 
+also from the individuals who own or run those institutions, 
+including board members and top executives.
+    Thirty years later the department has never brought an 
+action under this authority. The department has largely failed 
+to fine schools for consumer facing wrongs, or issue other 
+sanctions on predatory institutions. And there are far too many 
+examples of the department certifying a school for years of 
+access to student aid funds, even when a school is facing a 
+known risk of losing State authorization or accreditation, or 
+is under investigation by State and Federal law enforcement.
+    Enforcement is not just about punishing misconduct. It's 
+also about deterring future misconduct. But even in terms of 
+routine compliance, the department's program review process and 
+compliance audits are riddled with delays and inefficiencies. 
+An Inspector General's sample of 739 audits over an 11 year 
+period found more than 75 percent to have been conducted in a 
+failing or deficient manner.
+    I've noted additional failures in my written testimony. 
+This is not to say that Federal student aid is always missing 
+the mark. But given the enormous investment in student aid, and 
+the life-long effects that failures can have on students and 
+borrowers, the department must be doing a better job of 
+oversight.
+    I want to emphasize three additional high level 
+recommendations. First, FSA must embed student protections in 
+all of its decisions. Decisions should be about what is best 
+for students. FSA currently considers regulated entities to be 
+its partners. It's long past time for students and borrowers to 
+be the true borrowers of the department.
+    Second, the department must collaborate to reduce racial 
+disparities around student debt. FSA should work closely with 
+the department's Office for Civil Rights, and the Civil Rights 
+Division of Justice, each of which has unique authorities and 
+expertise.
+    Third, FSA should create a public service office to oversee 
+issues relating specifically to teachers, nurses and so many 
+others. There should be personnel dedicated to coordinating 
+with the VA on the GI bill, and with the Department of Defense 
+on post-secondary programs for military members and their 
+families.
+    And the department must improve the bipartisan public 
+service loan forgiveness program for all public servants. At 
+this time, the department can and must do better. Oversight is 
+one piece of a larger puzzle to ensure the promise of higher 
+education. I look forward to your questions. Thank you.
+    [The prepared statement of Mr. Zibel follows:]
+
+                 Prepared statement of Daniel A. Zibel
+[GRAPHICS NOT AVAILABLE IN TIFF FORMAT]
+
+    Chairwoman Wilson. Thank you so much. Thank you to all of 
+the witnesses, and again welcome. Under Committee Rule 9(a) we 
+will now question the witnesses under the five-minute rule. I 
+will be recognizing our subcommittee Members in seniority 
+order, again to ensure that the Members' five-minute rule is 
+adhered to, staff will be keeping track of time.
+    And the timer will sound when time has expired. Please be 
+attentive to the time. Wrap up when your time is over, and re-
+mute your microphone.
+    As chairwoman I now recognize myself for five minutes.
+    This question goes to Mr. Thornton. Have you had unexpected 
+emergency expenses due to the pandemic? If so, how has 
+receiving emergency funding, including from the CARES Act 
+helped you meet your basic needs and ensure you could continue 
+in school?
+    And how do you think additional investments in student aid, 
+like restoring the purchasing power of the Pell Grant would 
+impact future generations of students?
+    Mr. Thornton. Yes. Thank you Congresswoman Wilson. So to 
+answer this question I would say that you know some unexpected 
+emergency expenses that have come up due to the pandemic are 
+kind of what I mentioned was me, unfortunately losing my job 
+last year, right before school started.
+    Initially I had the job for about 2 months, and it put me 
+in a position to where I was comfortable enough to be able to 
+go out and you know get my own apartment. And with the job not 
+needing as many employees, I was let go from that job, so it 
+put me in a position to where I had to pour a lot of funds from 
+my savings, and it put me in a position to where I wasn't 
+really as able to provide for myself in terms of rent, bills, 
+and even things concerning school, being able to purchase 
+materials.
+    So as far as receiving under the CARES Act, it literally 
+came just in time, and I was able to use that to not only take 
+care of myself as far as where I was staying, but even take 
+care of myself as far as school is concerned. And I purchased 
+the necessary materials in order to stay afloat and gain the 
+wisdom and knowledge that I needed in order to pass my courses.
+    So that was about later last year sometime, and to answer 
+your question as far as additional investments in student aid. 
+I think it would be awesome. I think it definitely would help 
+us as students a lot, just given the current situation still 
+with this pandemic, a lot of people are still losing their 
+jobs.
+    It's hard for people to even find jobs, and a lot of 
+people, students my age, we work so that we can take care of 
+ourselves as far as school is concerned. So when it comes to 
+receiving additional funds and additional aid it would help a 
+lot. I think it would definitely have a huge impact on us being 
+able to stay in school an also be able to provide for ourselves 
+concerning our school as well.
+    Chairwoman Wilson. Thank you so much. And with programs 
+like 5,000 Role Models of Excellence and the TRIO Program 
+alone, how has mentoring impacted your success?
+    Mr. Thornton. I would say it has greatly impacted my 
+success even now. As I mentioned with a shout out to Ms. 
+Tiffany Tyler who has played a huge role in me being here, in 
+my first year here, she made it memorable, honestly.
+    And for her to continue to remain in contact with me, 
+checking with me, see how I'm doing with school, checking in on 
+my GPA, making sure that I'm able to stay afloat, making sure 
+that I'm applying to scholarships. She honestly helped me out 
+so much. And for that I'm extremely grateful.
+    And even within the 5000 Role Models of Excellence Program 
+and TRIO Program, outside of mentors I was able to build 
+lasting relationships with young men like myself who were a 
+part of this program and who are still pursuing a degree. I 
+know that Ms. Congresswoman Wilson is familiar with a fine 
+young man named Preston Cooper who not only was my roommate he 
+was a 5,000 Role Models Alum.
+    And he's honestly been a great addition to my life and has 
+helped me grow in many different ways. So the 5,000 Role Model 
+in Excellence Program and TRIO Program has been tremendous and 
+has helped me to get where I am now, as I mentioned to 
+potentially be able to graduate by the end of this summer.
+    Chairwoman Wilson. Thank you. Mr. Zibel how can the 
+Department of Education better protect students, especially 
+those most vulnerable to abuse from predatory institutions? 
+Predatory actors.
+    Mr. Zibel. Sure thank you Chair Wilson. Look, under over 
+the last 4 years I think what we've seen is an administration 
+that eviscerated a lot of important protections for students. 
+Repealing the gainful employment rule, raising the bar for 
+Trump borrower defense, or you know the student loan discharges 
+for defrauded students, you know, to the point where I think 
+the last Congress even used the Congressional Review Act to try 
+to veto what Secretary DeVos had done, stalling a worse relief 
+for borrowers who had been defrauded by for-profit colleges.
+    So part of it is restoring a lot of those protections, but 
+that's not it. That can't be it. There has to be a cultural 
+shift at the department by putting student interest first. 
+Enforcement in this space can't just be about punishing actors, 
+and providing debt relief after the fact. We've got to be 
+deterring conduct in the first place.
+    Student lives are at stake, and the ramifications of this 
+are long-lasting, so we really need to be thinking about that 
+first. Our organization has been writing a lot about this over 
+the past six-months at 100daydocket.org about how to 
+reinvigorate enforcement and really put those culture 
+protections at the front end for all students and student loan 
+borrowers.
+    Chairwoman Wilson. Thank you so much. I now recognize Dr. 
+Foxx for her questioning.
+    Ms. Foxx. Thank you Madam Chairman I appreciate that. Dr. 
+Burke, well thanks to all of our witnesses today. Dr. Burke 
+thank you for your testimony. Congressional Democrats are 
+passionate about oversight of one particular sector of 
+postsecondary education, the for-profit sector.
+    The congressional Republicans care about all students at 
+all institutions. What are the current institutional 
+accountability metrics in the Higher Ed Act and how effective 
+are they? Were these effective during the pandemic, or were 
+they exposed as deficient?
+    Ms. Burke. Well thank you Chairwoman Foxx for that 
+question. The current accountability metrics in the Higher 
+Education Act, I would say are rather lacking if we just look 
+at outcomes. And that applies to all sectors. I think that it 
+is inaccurate to say that problems in higher education are 
+solely a function of career and technical education programs.
+    If we look at traditional four-year brick and mortar 
+colleges, unfortunately, we see low graduation rates across the 
+board. I mentioned that the 6-year graduation rate is 60 
+percent earlier, that's something that should concern us all.
+    I really think that we should compare apples to apples when 
+we're thinking about accountability. If you look at certificate 
+programs across the country, just 45 percent of students who 
+pursue a certificate at a public college had earned it with 3 
+years. That figure actually rises to 70 percent for students 
+who attend for-profit colleges.
+    And then there are other metrics as well. Andrew Gillan who 
+researches in this area found that there are 514 colleges, many 
+of these are community colleges at which the loan default rates 
+of their students actually exceed their graduation rates, and 
+he has called these red flag institutions.
+    And so you know we need accountability across the board. I 
+think one way to do that is to advertise the college scorecards 
+a little bit more. There's a lot of data already on that 
+college scorecard. There are data about almost everything that 
+you could want to know about college outcomes.
+    So I think it would help greatly if we had actors in the K-
+12 space like school boards, across the country making public 
+schools aware of the information, making guidance counselors 
+aware so they can provide that information to students. 
+Sunlight really is the best disinfectant and that applies to 
+accountability within the higher education system as well.
+    And then of course I would argue that one of the 
+accountability measures that we really need is accountability 
+for taxpayer dollars because at the end of the day our taxpayer 
+funds, the Federal Government originates and services 90 
+percent of all student loans now.
+    And a big step in the right direction, as I mentioned 
+earlier, would actually be to reduce some of these Federal 
+subsidies to make space for private lending to re-emerge. 
+Private lenders are in a better position to judge a student's 
+ability to repay those loans moving forward.
+    I think that is the single best accountability measure that 
+we could put into place.
+    Ms. Foxx. Well thank you very much. When I heard Mr. Zibel 
+say that it is inappropriate to punish actors, and we needed to 
+put students first, I thought that he was talking about the 
+Obama administration actually.
+    Do you have an idea on how we could align the incentives of 
+institutions, employers, taxpayers, and students. I think you 
+mentioned about accountability, but how do we align the 
+incentives so that it appears to be a win-win, instead of a 
+win-lose situation all the time?
+    Ms. Burke. Yes that's a great question Representative Foxx. 
+I think one of the best things to do is really a State level 
+effort, and we're already seeing this in 32 states across the 
+country, Virginia, Tennessee, Indiana, many others, where they 
+have policies in place that allocate their funds to public 
+colleges based on measures that include course completion, so I 
+think that's one good step in the right direction.
+    And then again at the end of the day, I think we can take a 
+cue from the market. We can look at what industry is doing when 
+it comes to really realigning incentives. There are many 
+industry upscaling programs that are out there at the moment. 
+You can look at companies, Amazon, FedEx, others that will 
+actually prepay tuition for programs that are aligned with 
+different career paths within their organization, and so I 
+think that's a way to really responsibly align incentives.
+    A lot of that though is going to have to happen at the 
+State level and within the private sector.
+    Ms. Foxx. Great. Well you gave me a good segue to talk 
+about fostering a culture of life-long learning, which we think 
+is very important. But the current system is not designed for 
+multiple access points and off ramps. What HEA reforms can 
+Congress make to create a system where short-term programs, 
+stackable credentials, and life-long learning is the new 
+normal?
+    Ms. Burke. Well that's such a critical question as well. 
+You know there are conversations right now around allowing 
+existing Title IV funds to go to shorter term programs to allow 
+students to direct those dollars to options that currently 
+aren't eligible under ETA rules because of those time 
+limitations.
+    I think that's a really good step in the right direction. 
+That would enable a lot of individuals, people who want to 
+switch careers, you know, mid-career to engage in earn and 
+learn opportunities, to take some of those Title IV funds to 
+shorter term program.
+    I think that's a step in the right direction. There are 
+larger reforms that need to take place like decoupling Federal 
+financing from accreditation to allow Title IV dollars to flow 
+in a more piecemeal way, but at least in the near-term, those 
+short-term options are a good step in the right direction.
+    Ms. Foxx. Thank you Madam Chairman. I yield back.
+    Chairwoman Wilson. Thank you, thank you. Mr. Takano of 
+California. Mr. Takano are you still connected? We'll come back 
+to Mr. Takano. Is Mr. Murphy on? Mr. Murphy of North Carolina, 
+Mr. Murphy.
+    Mr. Murphy. Thank you Chairwoman Wilson. First of all I 
+want to acknowledge Keith Thornton, Mr. Thornton, just to 
+congratulate you on the fine work that you've done, wish you 
+the best of success. You know that success comes from within, 
+and it doesn't come from being handed down to you, but it comes 
+from hard work and opportunity.
+    So I congratulate you on what you've done, and encourage 
+you to do even greater things and we look forward to hearing 
+back from you. So a question I'll direct, at least the first 
+one toward Dr. Burke, and thank you for joining us today. Your 
+testimony will help us as we seek to work with our Democratic 
+colleagues to reform the HEA, and the best interest of students 
+and taxpayer.
+    I want to stress the importance of bipartisanship. Last 
+year Congress came together in a bipartisan manner to pass two 
+COVID-19 relief packages that included specific, and very 
+significant funding for postsecondary education.
+    I have to say I was disappointed that this last funding 
+package went across party lines and was not a bipartisan 
+effort, and that's disappointing I think, not only for the 
+country, but for our Congress as whole. We need to really work 
+together. The American people are better served when we tackle 
+problems shoulder to shoulder.
+    In that vein Dr. Burke, let me ask your assessment of what 
+Congress did last year with the Higher Education Emergency 
+Relief Funding. Can you put into context the size and the scope 
+of the postsecondary educational bailout? You talked about 
+numbers before, but I'd like you to flush that out a little bit 
+more if you will.
+    Ms. Burke. Sure. Thank you Representative Murphy for that 
+question. I did talk about numbers before. I think it's 
+important to reiterate some of those numbers. The CARES Act was 
+14 billion for higher ed, and then we saw the second package in 
+December. That was another 21 billion dollars in that 
+supplemental proposal.
+    And then again colleges and universities will receive 40 
+billion as a result of this third package. So in all we're 
+talking about over 70 billion dollars. As I said this is more 
+than the entire Department of Education's annual discretionary 
+budget, so it really is a breathtaking sum.
+    I did a back of the envelope calculation this morning, and 
+if you consider the fact that there are 20 million roughly, 
+college students across the country, and we have now expended 
+as a result of these three packages in additional Federal 
+spending, 76 billion. That's over $3,800.00 per college 
+student, just in these additional funds that have gone out the 
+door.
+    So it really is like I said, I don't think there's a better 
+word to describe it than a breathtaking sum of new Federal 
+spending. And of course this is not free money. This is 
+taxpayer money. It gets handed down to future generations. 
+Right now we have about 28 trillion dollars standing as our 
+national debt, that's $84,000.00 per person in the country, and 
+this will certainly add to that.
+    So it's a large amount of money and it really needs some 
+oversight.
+    Mr. Murphy. I think we're good. That's OK. All right. Well 
+thank you Dr. Burke. Let me just say you know I've been very 
+concerned about administrative bloat, and I wrote a couple 
+papers on that. I was on a board of trustees at a liberal arts 
+college, and I saw our administrative bloat compared to the 42 
+other sister colleges skyrocket.
+    My fear is that Mr. Zibel would prefer we had more 
+committees, more Vice Presidents, more other bureaucracy. And 
+as we've seen the level, the amount of educational dollars that 
+actually go toward teaching students, does pale in comparison 
+to that of adding more administrative bloat.
+    I fear that now that we've poured all this massive money to 
+colleges, instead of actually learning to contract their 
+budgets and be responsible with them, will actually do just the 
+opposite. We'll see more lazy rivers. We'll see more quiet 
+oasis rooms. We'll veer from the mission of colleges to teach 
+students before.
+    So to your point they're going to now be flush with money. 
+And anybody flush with money is probably in some ways, I fear, 
+because of higher education and what they've done historically 
+in the last 10-15 years, they're going to spend it. And what 
+does that do in all of a sudden 5-10 years when that money runs 
+out, all of a sudden that is going to be demanded upon students 
+and giving them much, much, much higher access or risk, or 
+again being bankrupt when they have all these massive charges.
+    I wish you could speak to that just a little bit about 
+administrative bloat, and what this money is you think in your 
+prediction, is actually going to do to college costs in the 
+future.
+    Ms. Burke. Sure thank you for that question. Administrative 
+bloat is a huge problem. We have seen significant numbers and 
+staffing increases over the past decade. I mentioned earlier 
+that from 2001 to 2011 the number of non-teaching employees and 
+administrators increased 50 percent faster than teaching 
+faculty and colleges across the country.
+    If you just look at non-instructional staff at universities 
+around the country, that now accounts for more than half of 
+university payroll costs, the non-instructional staff. Just 40 
+percent of full-time employees at non-doctoral colleges are 
+instructional staff.
+    And that figure actually drops to 28 percent at doctoral 
+granting institutions. So just 28 percent at those institutions 
+are teaching faculty. This is something that higher education 
+scholar Preston Cooper has looked into at length, and he has a 
+new report he just put out that I would commend where he 
+recently found that since 2003 only one-third of the increase 
+in colleges and universities core expenditures has gone to 
+spending on instruction, just one-third of the increase goes to 
+instruction.
+    As he says almost all of the rest has fed the growth of the 
+vast administrative apparatus of these institutions. And so as 
+I mentioned in my opening statement, colleges really have 
+needed a course correction for decades, and so you know, I 
+think too many unfortunately are now looking at these various 
+stimulus bills as a way to pay for general fiscal mal-
+administration over the past two decades.
+    Mr. Murphy. Dr. Burke thank you. We're passed our time. I 
+appreciate it. Thank you Madam Chairman, I'll yield back.
+    Chairwoman Wilson. Thank you Mr. Murphy. Ms. Burke you are 
+consistently going over time. Please be mindful of the clock. 
+It's there for you. You seem not to hear me when I'm telling 
+you that you're over time, so you will have to keep up with the 
+time, and when you see that your time is up please stop. We 
+have a long hearing and a lot of people to ask questions. Thank 
+you.
+    Mr. Takano of California is our next person, speaker.
+    Mr. Takano. Thank you Madam Chair. My question is for 
+Chancellor Oakley. Chancellor could you comment briefly on how 
+California deals with the balance between the administrative 
+costs and instructional costs?
+    Mr. Oakley. Absolutely. And it's a pleasure to be here 
+again answering these questions. First of all in California you 
+know each State is different. But in California in the 
+community colleges, we actually have a law. It's called the 50 
+Percent Law, which requires every community college to assign 
+at least 50 percent of all revenues that come from the State to 
+instruction, to the classroom.
+    Now because the nature of instruction has changed quite a 
+bit over time, we have had to expand that view because there 
+are a number of other efforts that go into supporting a 
+student, including a lot of the student supports that help a 
+student succeed. So that is the way we handle it, and I would 
+also say that because our system is comprised of 73 districts, 
+all have locally elected boards, as well as a State system 
+which has a board of Governors.
+    There is a sunlight all over our system. So these questions 
+are constantly addressed. They're constantly examined, and 
+we're constantly being held accountable for where our dollars 
+go.
+    Mr. Takano. Thank you Chancellor. You know this hearing is 
+in relationship to the American Rescue Plan and how it relates 
+to education. I know that in California your sister 
+institutions, the California State University System, and the 
+UC system, have suspended the use of standardized tests for the 
+purposes of admission.
+    Do you expect that--it's not really an experiment, it was 
+sort of forced by circumstances. Do you expect these sorts of 
+things, these sorts of practices to continue after the pandemic 
+is over?
+    Mr. Oakley. I do. In the California community colleges 
+we've eliminated the use of standardized placement exams. We 
+have found through our own research, as well as research that's 
+happened across the country, that the use of standardized exams 
+for the purpose of placing the students in courses has 
+significantly undermined low-income students from all 
+backgrounds.
+    The same is true for standardized admissions exams. And I 
+think the research is overwhelming now. I think places like the 
+University of California have seen the impact that it has had 
+on low-income students and communities of color. And I don't 
+believe that we are going back to those practices in the 
+future.
+    Mr. Takano. Is it not true that this innovation, this 
+experimentation of not using tests like the placement, or to 
+place students into college level classes at California 
+community colleges. But that was going on pre-pandemic is what 
+I understand, and can you tell us about what you've seen? Is 
+your faculty happy with this? Have the outcomes been good? Have 
+your transfer rates suffered because of the fact that you're 
+placing students by using instruments other than standardized 
+tests?
+    Mr. Oakley. So first of all the use of what we call 
+multiple measures placement. That is using multiple sources of 
+information to gain information about a student, and place them 
+in the course that they deserve to be in, and particularly in 
+math and English, has been going on for several years in 
+certain pilots across the system.
+    A couple of years ago this became law for the entire 
+system. Since then students who have been placed using this 
+method, without using standardized placement exams, students 
+are succeeding in numbers equal to those students that may have 
+begun in remedial courses before then.
+    We have seen significant, significant increases in the 
+number of students of color that have been placed in transfer 
+level English and math, and they are succeeding at the same 
+rates as other students. So we have seen nothing but success 
+thus far. It's given us a lot of good information about how we 
+continue to roll this system out.
+    And as we continue to rely less and less on remedial 
+courses, and rely more and more on providing students a pathway 
+to getting into courses that actually count toward their 
+educational goal. And that's been the biggest change. So many 
+courses were created in remedial education before this change 
+that were leading nowhere.
+    And so many students, particularly those of low income 
+status were getting trapped in these courses and not being able 
+to complete their educational goal.
+    Mr. Takano. Thank you Chancellor my time is up. It sounds 
+like innovation was already happening in California community 
+colleges, and it sounds like diversifying the higher education 
+is also being significantly impacted. Madam Chair I yield back.
+    Chairwoman Wilson. Thank you so much. We'll now here from 
+Mr. Grothman from Wisconsin.
+    Mr. Grothman. Yes. Thanks for having me. I have a question 
+here for Dr. Burke. You know over the weekend I ran into 
+another woman, age 51. She got laid off. She had a general 
+degree, had a good job, and now she can't find anything. And 
+she was just bemoaning the fact that when she was you know, 
+rather than go to a four-year college, why she wasn't a welder, 
+a medical tech of some nature, something or other.
+    And I still hear back home well-paid guidance counselors 
+advising everybody to go to college when again and again, I 
+find people not going to college lined up higher paid with less 
+student debt, and more job security. What can we do to 
+straighten out these reasonably well-paid guidance counselors 
+to give people a little bit better advice, not to mention, on 
+the other end of the thing.
+    When I talked to our employers in construction, in medical 
+field, and manufacturing. Well right now the only thing holding 
+us back from building more housing in Wisconsin, we can't find 
+anybody to do the work. What can we do to straighten out these 
+guidance counselors there Dr. Burke? It's a lot of people's 
+lives.
+    Ms. Burke. Thank you Representative Grothman. I completely 
+agree with you that we need to be communicating to students 
+that there are multiple pathways to climbing the ladder of 
+upward, economic mobility in America. And too often, the only 
+answer that we give them when asked what they should do, is 
+attend a traditional four-year college.
+    And that has not served many students well who would be 
+better situated in the future if they did something other than 
+go through that four-year brick and mortar route. And you know 
+to your point about construction workers and mechanics, 
+electricians, waitresses, you know, all of these individuals 
+end up bearing the cost of Federal bailouts, and ever-
+increasing Federal subsidies in the higher education sector.
+    I think it's always important to bear in mind that still 
+today two-thirds of Americans do not hold bachelors degrees, 
+and it is that two-thirds of Americans who also have to pick-up 
+the cost for ever-increasing Federal spending.
+    Mr. Grothman. OK. I'll give you a general question. You 
+know again I hear talking to my trade unions or tech schools 
+and people, you know, going back, getting a skill, maybe in 
+their early 30's, after they already got a college degree in 
+their early 20's.
+    Percentage-wise Doctor Burke, I have no idea what 
+percentage of people going to a four-year college would be 
+better off not going to one today in your opinion.
+    Ms. Burke. Well it's hard to say, and it depends on how you 
+quantify better off. You know even an individual who might not 
+see a massive increase in earnings after having graduated, 
+might still say that the experience was worthwhile for them.
+    People go to college for a lot of different reasons. But 
+one thing we do know is there are an awful lot of students who 
+leave without earning that paper credential that they had so 
+fought to get. So many students right now are leaving without 
+graduating, and I mentioned 60 percent, 6 year college 
+graduation rate. And really the worst position you can be in is 
+having gone to two or three or three and a half years of 
+undergrad work, taken out those loans and not graduated with 
+that paper credential.
+    And unfortunately, we do see that in many cases. So I think 
+that for those individuals you could make the case that another 
+path would have been much more worthwhile, but it is hard to 
+quantify.
+    Mr. Grothman. Well, OK I know there's certain authors who 
+take a stab at it, but I'm going to come back to the woman I 
+talked to over the weekend. You know I frequently make the 
+pitch for young people to get a skill, rather than college, and 
+that you're going to graduate with less debt, and frequently 
+make more money immediately.
+    One thing I don't think is taken into account is if you do 
+wind up with some middle low management thing, and you're laid 
+off when you're 50 or 55, in our society frequently you're 
+almost unemployable. Whereas if you have a skill, you can keep 
+working until you're 60 or 70 or 80 if you want to. Could you 
+comment on the benefit of having a skill, a specific skill set 
+in manufacturing, med, tech, whatever, as opposed to a general 
+degree on people who get laid off when they're over 40?
+    Ms. Burke. Sure. Well what we do know, and I can't give you 
+specific numbers on the skill-based side. But what we do know 
+is that there are a large proportion of students who are 
+leaving undergraduate work, and entering jobs that do not 
+require a college degree. And so this high level of what we 
+refer to as underemployment is a real problem.
+    And I think does suggest that many of those students would 
+have been better served pursuing options that are skills-based 
+in nature.
+    Mr. Grothman. Well thank you Dr. Burke. I appreciate what 
+you're saying, and I hope you continue to educate young people 
+around the country to get a second opinion from their guidance 
+counselors, who are frequently well-paid and giving bad advice 
+for their pay. Thank you.
+    Chairwoman Wilson. Thank you. Thank you so much. Ms. 
+Jayapal from Washington I see you driving, welcome.
+    Ms. Jayapal. Thank you Madam Chair. I am not driving I 
+promise you, but I am in a car because I didn't want to miss 
+this very important hearing. It is clear that the pandemic has 
+had a negative impact on college enrollment for all students, 
+particularly low-income, first generation, and certainly 
+freshman of color, who we've seen a nearly 30 percent decline 
+in community college enrollment across the country.
+    And since a degree, a higher education degree, whether it's 
+skills training, or a four year college, remains a strong 
+pathway to the middle class our economic recovery may be 
+largely dependent on affordable access to postsecondary 
+education. And that's why I'm excited for the Seattle Promise 
+Program in my district, and proposals like My College for All 
+Act which President Biden has embraced, to make both four-year 
+and two year public higher education free for families earning 
+up to $125,000.00.
+    Mr. Thornton it's very clear from your testimony that 
+Federal programs like TRIO have been meaningful to you 
+personally, and in your student career, in spite of programs 
+that help some students shoulder the cost of textbooks, 
+housing, food, and childcare, data still shows that due to 
+COVID-19 as many as 56 percent of students will need additional 
+aid to stay enrolled.
+    Is it your opinion that more comprehensive Federal 
+assistance would help students to stay in school?
+    Mr. Thornton. Yes. Thank you so much for asking, and I 
+definitely agree that additional funding would help students be 
+able to stay in school. I think kind of being a living 
+testimony to the current situation with the pandemic, me plus a 
+bunch of other students like myself, some people we literally 
+worked, some students we worked to actually stay in school to 
+pay tuition, to pay to afford books and school materials.
+    And I think that additional funding definitely would assist 
+in the students being able to stay in school, and pursue their 
+dreams, or their dream job, or pursue a career with their 
+major.
+    Ms. Jayapal. So important. Thank you so much. Considering 
+Pell has gone from covering 80 percent of the [audio issues] to 
+less than 30 percent at a public four-year college, would you 
+speak more on this disparity making college increasingly out of 
+reach for too many people?
+    Mr. Vassar. I think the beginning of your question was not 
+heard Congresswoman Jayapal.
+    Ms. Jayapal. Oh OK, thank you. This is a question for 
+Chancellor Oakley. Non-tuition costs are an important 
+consideration since Pell has gone from covering 80 percent of 
+expenses to less than 30 percent at a public four-year college. 
+Would you speak more on this disparity making college 
+increasingly out of reach for too many people?
+    Mr. Oakley. Absolutely and thank you for that question 
+Representative Jayapal. This is particularly an acute situation 
+in states like California. High cost of living states, high 
+cost of living communities. Our students, particularly those 
+who attend California community colleges and those who attend 
+broad access public institutions come from some of the lowest 
+income communities in California and throughout the country.
+    So the cost of attending college is the most significant 
+cost. States like California for example, the California 
+community colleges has the lowest tuition in the country. In 
+addition, more than half of our students don't pay tuition 
+because of the California College Promise.
+    So the cost of attending college, the true cost of 
+attending college is the issue that keeps so many students from 
+one, attending college, and two, attending full-time because so 
+many of them have to juggle multiple issues, have to maintain 
+work in order to provide for their families and for their own 
+education.
+    So Pell is a significant component to helping those 
+individuals afford to go to college, to complete their college 
+education in a four-year period of time. And it has not been 
+keeping up with the cost of attending college.
+    And so supporting an increase in Pell is certainly 
+something that we support, as well as continuing to reduce the 
+cost of attendance is also a key ingredient.
+    Ms. Jayapal. Thank you so much. And my College For All bill 
+would double Pell, and it would allow states with tuition 
+programs to redirect any of their savings toward making college 
+more accessible. How would--my College for All bill also uses a 
+Federal/State partnership to make public four-year universities 
+free for qualifying students.
+    Chancellor, how would having a Federal partnership that 
+allows states to redirect savings to non-tuition costs help 
+colleges nationally as they struggle with low enrollment?
+    Mr. Oakley. Well I believe this Federal/State partnership 
+is critical. States are in the primary role of providing 
+support for our colleges and universities and they're doing--
+states like California are doing a remarkable job of providing 
+the additional support, lowering tuition, keeping tuition low, 
+keeping the cost of college low.
+    So this partnership would be beneficial in that states like 
+California could use those additional resources to provide 
+additional support for students, either support services or 
+support for non-tuition related costs.
+    Ms. Jayapal. Thank you so much. And this is a key important 
+piece, and I look forward to working with you. Madam Chair I 
+yield back.
+    Chairwoman Wilson. Thank you. Thank you so much. According 
+to my records Mr. Good of Virginia is the next questioner. Mr. 
+Good you're on.
+    Mr. Good. Thank you Madam Chairman, and thank you to all of 
+our witnesses for being with us today. My questions will be 
+directed specifically to Dr. Burke. Dr. Burke I wanted to ask 
+you how do you think Federal funding has contributed to the 
+exploding costs of higher education?
+    Ms. Burke. Well thank you for that question Representative 
+Good. It has clearly contributed. If you look at the inflation 
+adjusted tuition rates since the 1970's. Those have quintupled 
+at both public and private colleges across the country. And 
+then when you compare that number to Federal subsidies, and 
+those subsidies over the same time period have really increased 
+dramatically with spending on student loans rising 328 percent 
+over the last 30 years, from about 20 billion in 1990 to about 
+87.5 billion in the most recent year of data available.
+    So, and I would also say that this question of 
+disinvestment and State spending is I think, also a little bit 
+off the mark. Because if you look at appropriations for public 
+colleges and universities at the State level, those have 
+increased $1,700.00 per pupil in real terms since 1980.
+    So it is safe to say, I would agree with Economist Richard 
+Vetter at the University of Ohio that dumping Federal subsidies 
+out of helicopters as he once put it, has only enabled 
+universities to increase their costs, their spending 
+profligately, and really pass that on to students.
+    Mr. Good. I've had students tell me, and parents tell me 
+that once they get on the student loan treadmill it just 
+continues. In other words they get loans, it's almost you have 
+to work deliberately to stop the student loans from coming. 
+Once you enroll that first semester that first year, it seems 
+automatic.
+    In your testimony you talked about requiring university's 
+report on the use of Federal funding. What specific questions 
+might you ask them to report on?
+    Ms. Burke. Sure. And I think specifically with regard to 
+the new money that has gone out the door, we really need to 
+know whether colleges are using these funds to actually help 
+students who are struggling. There's statutory requirements. 
+About 50/50 of those dollars going to student-based aid, and 
+then the other 50 percent going to institutional priorities, 
+but we really do need to take a look and encourage colleges, 
+and the Department of Ed to assess if they're sending that 
+money to students who are financially struggling.
+    And then second I would say, we should assess if they're 
+actually using those funds to build out their IT and distance 
+learning capacities to navigate any sort of similar existential 
+threat in the future that they might face like another 
+pandemic.
+    Mr. Good. You've done a great job of verbalizing what most 
+of us have already seen in the way that college education costs 
+are just going through the roof, far outpacing inflation, 
+multiple times over.
+    Besides addressing funding, what policies do you think 
+Congress could do that could help enact the amount of the non-
+classroom, non-education expenses specifically, the more what 
+many might think are wasteful or exorbitant, or excessive, 
+whether it's staff, or whether it's activities that are being 
+funded.
+    What role do you think Congress could play. How could 
+Congress help address the amount of spending that's going to 
+administrative type and other, maybe what some people might 
+think, excessive and wasteful spending?
+    Ms. Burke. Well I think the single best thing Congress 
+could do would be eliminate the Plus Loan program. The Grad 
+Plus Loan program in particular, this allowed graduate students 
+to borrow up to the cost of attendance, and then the Parent 
+Plus program allows parents to borrow for their undergrad 
+student's college experience.
+    And that really encourages, a family level of debt, and 
+family level borrowing for families. So eliminating the Plus 
+Loan program would be the No. 1 step to take. And as I 
+mentioned earlier, actually allowing colleges themselves to 
+limit the amount of money that students borrow.
+    Mr. Good. It seems we have systemic issues where there's 
+not a partnership between parents, families if you will, of 
+students and the institutions, and trying to together work to 
+make college affordable without putting people of course into 
+excessive debt.
+    What might be included? What role might Congress play to 
+help improve competition in such that like a career in 
+education, a technical education, temporary programs, 
+vocational programs, community college, and other workforce 
+development pathways might be able to get on equal footing with 
+the traditional four-year school.
+    Ms. Burke. Yes thanks. Again, I think one of the best 
+options there would actually be reforming accreditation, 
+decoupling Federal financing from accreditation to allow new 
+quality assurance mechanisms to pop up, to allow a State to for 
+instance, enable the Mayo Clinic to credential a nursing 
+course, or the State of Virginia to allow Mount Vernon to 
+credential a history course.
+    And then enable Title IV funds to actually follow students 
+to those individually credentialled courses and courses of 
+study. And again, couple that with those short-term options for 
+Title IV funding that would allow individuals to go find the 
+skills and competencies they need immediately without going 
+through a four-year brick and mortar college, would be a second 
+extremely important step in that direction.
+    Mr. Good. I think I've about expired my time. I thank you 
+very much for answering my questions, and again appreciate you 
+and all the other witnesses being with us today. I yield back 
+my time Chairman.
+    Chairwoman Wilson. Thank you so much. Ms. Leger Fernandez 
+of New Mexico welcome.
+    Ms. Leger Fernandez. Hello. Thank you so much Chair Wilson. 
+And thank you to the witnesses for joining us today. Mr. Zibel, 
+we've heard misrepresentations about your testimony. Would you 
+like to respond quickly?
+    Mr. Zibel. Thank you Congresswoman. You know I think there 
+were two comments. One from Ranking Member Foxx. I guess to put 
+it bluntly, I don't think I said anything about punishment not 
+being important. I think it is an important aspect of deterring 
+misconduct.
+    And when there is an institution of higher education, and 
+we've seen this for decades. I really would encourage the 
+Members to go back and look at the bipartisan report that 
+Senator Sam Nunn and his committee drafted, back in the early 
+nineties.
+    And it really is deja vu all over again for some of what 
+we've been seeing. And you know this is about protecting 
+students at the front end. This is about making sure that 
+students aren't saddled with debt, that they will never repay 
+because of worthless degrees. This is about making sure that 
+individuals are getting the economic opportunity through 
+education to better their lives, and to ensure that the 
+taxpayer investment in this, through grants and loans is being 
+well spent.
+    So you know it's not about partisan politics. I think if 
+you look back at the history of this, Secretary Bennett, the 
+Education Secretary under President Reagan was a fierce critic 
+of the for-profit education industry, and for good reason at 
+that time. And you know, history has a tendency to repeat 
+itself, and you know, that's what the Department of Education 
+needs to be doing, is really making sure that that does not 
+happen again.
+    It does not happen to saddle yet another generation of 
+students with these mountains of debts that will never be 
+repaid.
+     Ms. Leger Fernandez. Thank you for that clarification, and 
+also making sure that we all focus. Our focus should be, 
+indeed, on the students. And in thinking about the focus on the 
+students I am, like the chair and others who have testified 
+today, concerned about the non-tuition costs of college, and 
+that the pandemic has simply worsened food insecurity, and that 
+that's something that the Rescue Act can address with the 
+emergency funding.
+    Miss Chairwoman, I ask unanimous consent to enter into the 
+record an article from the Santa Fe Reporter entitled, ``New 
+Mexico College Students Face Food Insecurity.''
+    Chairwoman Wilson. So ordered.
+    Ms. Leger Fernandez. I'm also concerned about declines in 
+student enrollment. And students of color in particular, right, 
+have seen steep enrollment declines during the pandemic. In New 
+Mexico, as an example, we've seen about a 10 percent decline 
+from fall 2019 to fall 2020.
+    We are also in New Mexico, facing the need to diversify our 
+energy sector and move to a green economy, and will really need 
+those partnerships without our higher education schools to lead 
+in training for this just renewable innovative economy, like I 
+like to say, in New Mexico.
+    In Santa Fe Community College we just partnered with our 
+National Labs and the renewable energy sector connecting 
+schools and employers. Chancellor Ortiz Oakley, what do you 
+believe are the best practices to recover student enrollment, 
+and especially addressing those programs which could develop 
+the workforce for new economies like the green economy?
+    Mr. Oakley. Thank you for that question Congresswoman. 
+First and foremost, I strongly believe that community colleges 
+are the greatest answer to a recovery with equity in America. 
+They are closest to the students that we're talking about. They 
+open their arms to every student, whether recently displaced 
+worker, or a recent graduate from a high school.
+    And community college is college, so they are preparing 
+students for success in 21st Century economy. So first of all, 
+I believe one of the greatest impacts on our students has been 
+the economic fallout, the health effects from the pandemic. Our 
+communities of color and low-income communities have been hit 
+the hardest. So for them it is an economic issue, so providing 
+direct, emergency support of any kind possible, is one of the 
+best antidotes to helping them be able to make the choice 
+between paying rent, and paying for their tuition and books, so 
+that they can continue their education.
+    Second, it's addressing the needs of displaced workers. So 
+many working adults were already struggling post the last 
+recession. This pandemic, the economic fallout, has devastated 
+their opportunity to be in the economy in a meaningful way. So 
+supporting short-term, career-training programs, to help get 
+the support, the skills and competencies that workers need 
+today, I think is critically important to a recovery with 
+equity.
+    Ms. Leger Fernandez. Thank you very much Chancellor, I 
+yield back.
+    Chairwoman Wilson. Thank you. Ms. Miller-Meeks of Iowa 
+you're next. You're now live.
+    Ms. Miller-Meeks. Thank you so much. I appreciate it Madam 
+Chair. Thank you for holding this subcommittee hearing, and for 
+providing for the witness testimonies. Thank all of you for 
+testifying today. So I'm a little unusual. I'm one of eight 
+kids. When I was burned at 15, decided to become a doctor. And 
+so I left home at 16.
+    I actually enrolled in San Antonio Junior College as it was 
+called at that time, then was able to get a degree in nursing, 
+a master's in education and ultimately a medical degree. So I 
+fully support what you've said about community colleges and a 
+pathway for education, especially for minority, for women, for 
+under-represented groups of low-income, but actually for any 
+student who wishes to go onto college, especially if they're 
+concerned and aren't quite sure what they want to major in, or 
+what will be a successful career path for them.
+    Having said that I was able to work, go to school and have 
+a combination of loans. And so my question for Dr. Burke is 
+that there appears to be a dramatic rise in the number of loans 
+borrowed for graduate level programs, and often these graduate 
+level programs lead to high-paying jobs.
+    And I'm concerned about the combination of unlimited 
+Federal lending, and unlimited loan forgiveness for these 
+individuals who may ultimately result in a higher income career 
+pathway. So can you briefly explain in you're concerned about 
+this, and you know what can Congress do to create a responsible 
+lending program, and how can these reforms lead to lowered 
+college cost for students?
+    Ms. Burke. Great thank you Representative Miller-Meeks. I 
+appreciate that. It is, it's a major concern I think for many 
+of us. The proposals that are out there right now to forgive 
+student loan debt anywhere from $10,000.00 to $50,000.00 and 
+student loan debt, depending on what proposal you look at, are 
+incredibly regressive in nature.
+    They would really shift the burden of paying for college 
+away from those individuals who do in fact directly benefit 
+from their education onto, as I mentioned, the two-thirds of 
+Americans who don't have bachelors degrees, and would 
+presumably not earn as much down the road on average, as their 
+college-going counterparts.
+    And you also bring up a really important point, which is 
+the point about professional degrees and borrowing. We know 
+that individuals who pursue professional degrees in particular, 
+on average, do quite well. Doctors, lawyers, and so the idea 
+that we would forgive those student loans among those 
+individuals who statistically speaking are likely to earn a 
+decent living moving forward, really, as I said earlier, is 
+regressive.
+    And so I think to get back to my earlier point, if we want 
+to drive down costs, we need to tackle the Plus Loan program. 
+The private lending market will meet the needs of students who 
+are pursuing professional degrees, knowing full well that their 
+ability to repay those loans will be very high in the future.
+    Ms. Miller-Meeks. Thank you for that. And in Iowa we have 
+concurrent enrollment for high school and for community 
+colleges as pathways to success. We also have the Iowa Student 
+Loan program, and you had mentioned about private lending and 
+Federal lending.
+    We're very concerned. They do a great job of mentoring 
+students, advising them, looking at if they're a certain 
+educational pathway, how that will result in income and ability 
+to pay back loans. And I'm concerned about, you know, doing 
+away with an institution such as the Iowa Student Loan program 
+which does a great job of preparing students and also giving 
+financial literacy.
+    So if students want to find good jobs after college, and 
+that could mean that it leads to a baccalaureate, but it could 
+be a different career pathway. And there is a discrepancy 
+between what students feel like they know what employers say 
+about their job readiness, and I just was going to ask if there 
+are some non-traditional education pathways that students 
+should be exploring, Dr. Burke.
+    Ms. Burke. Thank you. There certainly are a lot of really 
+innovative non-traditional pathways that are out there, and I 
+think interest is growing in these pathways, because we know 
+that employers, as I mentioned earlier, are reporting that 
+students who attend the traditional four-year route, aren't 
+often prepared.
+    There was a survey that came out in 2018 from the National 
+Association of Colleges and Employers that found that although 
+almost 80 percent of students believe they're proficient in 
+oral and written communication, just 42 percent of employers 
+agreed.
+    And then that survey was followed-up by a subsequent survey 
+from the Association of American Colleges and Universities that 
+found that similarly, while 62 percent of students felt they 
+were competent in these skills, just 28 percent of employers 
+agreed. So this gap in skills was eluded to earlier, does have 
+negative economic impacts.
+    It's left more than six million jobs empty across the 
+country, so I think all of that calls into question the value 
+add for a lot of institutions.
+    Ms. Miller-Meeks. Thank you Madam Chair. I yield back my 
+time.
+    Chairwoman Wilson. Thank you, thank you. And now our good 
+friend Mr. Jones of New York. Welcome to the committee, 
+welcome.
+    Mr. Jones. Thank you so much for your leadership Madam 
+Chair. And thank you to all of the witnesses for appearing 
+before us today. On behalf of the American people I want to 
+thank Chancellor Oakley for your innovative work to address the 
+challenges faced by community college students during the 
+pandemic.
+    Mr. Zibel, for your work to hold the bad actors in our 
+higher education system accountable, and of course Mr. Thornton 
+for sharing your important first-hand experiences as a student 
+during these hard times. While the ongoing pandemic has put a 
+strain on colleges and universities, we can all agree that the 
+core problems in U.S. higher education predate the COVID-19 
+pandemic.
+    Wages have been stagnant for literally decades when you 
+adjust for inflation, even as the cost of a four-year college 
+education has soared. The average debt of someone graduating 
+from a four-year college or university today is four times 
+higher than it was in the early nineties, and this burden is 
+not shared equally.
+    Women, people of color, and members of the LGBTQ community 
+hold a disproportionate amount of student debt, and find 
+themselves less likely to graduate with a four-year degree. In 
+my district, in Westchester and Rockland Counties in New York, 
+where the cost of living is sky-high, thousands of young people 
+must live at home with their parents in part, due to the 
+student debt that they shoulder.
+    This delays, or outright forecloses their home ownership, 
+which we know to be the single greatest generator of wealth in 
+America. So I look forward to working with my colleagues to 
+address these issues, and want to thank them for their work to 
+make college accessible, affordable, and equitable for all.
+    Before turning to my questions, I do want to set the record 
+straight on the idea that increases in financial aid somehow 
+lead to increases in tuition. That is simply not true. First of 
+all no study on the so-called Bennett hypothesis has been able 
+to find convincing evidence that this hypothesis is real, at 
+least at public institutions.
+    However, a rigorous study found that for-profit 
+institutions eligible for Federal student aid, charged 78 
+percent more than comparable programs at ineligible, for-profit 
+institutions. This strongly suggests that we need better 
+oversight of the for-profit sector, not that we should stop 
+providing students with Federal aid to enroll in college.
+    Mr. Zibel, I'd like to begin with you. As you stated in an 
+interview last year, there are many problems for the government 
+to address in this country right now, and the Department of 
+Education doesn't have to wait for Congress to act when it 
+comes to providing student debt relief.
+    I've been a leader on this issue in the Congress. Indeed 
+Congress has already given the Department of Education clear 
+statutory authority to forgive Federally owned student debt 
+under the Higher Education Act. So Mr. Zibel would you agree 
+that under existing law, yes or no, the President or his 
+education secretary has the ability to forgive federally-owned 
+student loan debt with a stroke of a pen.
+    Mr. Zibel. So thank you Congressman for your question, and 
+I appreciate your earlier commentary leading up to it. This is 
+an important topic, and something that I understand that the 
+White House and the department are taking a very, very close 
+look at. You know quite frankly it is not something I have ever 
+taken the kind of legal dive that I think needs to be taken.
+    And I really want to defer to the experts who have taken 
+the dive on that one before, commenting in front of Congress 
+today. But I think what's immediately clear is that there are 
+buckets of student loan borrowers for whom that immediate 100 
+percent loan relief is doable right now. These are the 400,000 
+borrowers who government has already determined are eligible 
+for total and permanent disability discharges.
+    These are the borrowers that the department has already 
+found victimized by predatory for-profit colleges. These are 
+borrowers who are attending schools that closed. And government 
+needs to be taking those steps right now today, to discharge 
+100 percent of those loans.
+    Mr. Jones. Yes. Mr. Zibel I appreciate that, reclaiming my 
+time, and actually I agree with you, and I would like to enter 
+it back into the record a paper you co-authored in October 2020 
+on this very issue of for-profit colleges, personally causing 
+financial losses to students and taxpayers because of their 
+misconduct. Madam Chair I'd like to enter that into the record.
+    Chairwoman Wilson. So ordered.
+    Mr. Jones. And I would just to put a finer point on this, I 
+understand that you don't consider yourself an expert on this 
+subject, but Mr. Zibel you would at least agree that the 
+Department of Education has already used its statutory 
+authority to pause the collection of student debt, and indeed 
+the accrual of interest, which is obviously a form of student 
+debt cancellation, yes or no?
+    Mr. Zibel. Yes. I mean quite----
+    Mr. Jones. Thank you. Reclaiming my time. Thank you so 
+much. And finally, as we close, as concerns about the spread of 
+COVID-19 increase, so did reported incidents of bullying, 
+racism, and xenophobia toward the Asian, Asian American, and 
+Asian Pacific Islander, or AAPI communities on college campuses 
+across the country.
+    Consequently, individuals from these communities reportedly 
+afraid to engage on basic day to day tasks, like going to the 
+grocery store, or walking alone in their neighborhoods. 
+Chancellor Oakley, what can colleges and universities do to 
+ensure that AAPI students feel safe and valued in their classes 
+and on campuses?
+    Mr. Oakley. Thank you for that question Congressman. First 
+of all to be very clear, all colleges and universities should 
+immediately and clearly repudiate any attacks on the Asian 
+American or Pacific Islander community. We need to engage 
+directly with our students, our faculty and our staff to 
+discuss these issues, to ensure that we remove the stigma that 
+has been applied to Asian American communities around the 
+COVID-19 pandemic, or anything else.
+    So we should treat this issue like we would any other 
+racial reckoning issue and take it on head-on. We have a direct 
+role in that, and we have our classrooms and our colleges, and 
+our microphone to be able to weigh in on this.
+    Mr. Jones. Thank you sir. Madam Chair I yield back.
+    Chairwoman Wilson. Thank you so much. Let me be mindful to 
+the witnesses. There's a time limit. And when you see stop I 
+will give you the opportunity to finish your thought, but not a 
+whole minute. Some of these issues are so important we need to 
+address them, but we have to be fair. Thank you so much. And 
+now Mrs. McClain of Michigan you're now live Mrs. McClain.
+    Mrs. McClain. Thank you so much Madam Chair. I appreciate 
+the opportunity to be on this committee, and I appreciate 
+everyone on the committee as well as all the witnesses. My 
+question is really regarding oversight and directed to Dr. 
+Burke.
+    You suggest Congress keep a watch on the tens of billions 
+of dollars colleagues are spending in emergency relief. What 
+exactly are some categories of expenses you are most interested 
+in, and what indicators should Congress pay attention to that 
+show it used taxpayers money responsibly?
+    Ms. Burke. Thank you for that question Representative 
+McClain. So as I eluded to earlier, there are statutory 
+allowances for these additional funds, and then there are the I 
+think recommendations for what colleges should be using these 
+funds for.
+    So for example, the public and non-profit schools can use 
+the money in these emergency higher education reform dollars 
+for financial aid to students, and then they can use about half 
+for institutional revenue, so that can be anything from faculty 
+and staff training, it can be payroll costs, it can be 
+backfilling lost revenue, it can be backfilling lost revenue 
+due to a lack of sporting events, so it really runs the gamut.
+    So those are indeed allowable uses of these funds. At the 
+university level though, I think what they really should be 
+using these funds for is to support struggling students. And as 
+I said earlier, build out their IT infrastructures so that they 
+can navigate these challenges in the future.
+    And so I think that's the role of oversight at the 
+Department of Ed, is to really look at what they're doing. They 
+do have to submit reports, universities do regularly on how 
+they're spending these funds. I hope the department makes those 
+reports as public as possible.
+    Mrs. McClain. Thank you. I yield back my time. Thank you 
+very much.
+    Chairwoman Wilson. Thank you. We'll now hear from Ms. 
+Manning of North Carolina.
+    Ms. Manning. Thank you Madam Chair, and thank you to all 
+the witnesses for being with us today. My first question is to 
+Chancellor Oakley. I have two terrific community colleges in my 
+district. I visited them when I was in district last to see the 
+incredible things they're doing, and how they're holding up 
+during his pandemic.
+    They're doing all they can to support their students, but 
+they have seen enrollment decline. How have you handled the 
+tuition, the reduce tuition revenue from declining enrollment 
+if your community colleges had to take cost-cutting measures? 
+And if so, what kinds of things are they doing?
+    Mr. Oakley. Thank you for that question Representative 
+Manning. And North Carolina has amazing community colleges. 
+First of all, the pandemic has had a direct impact on the 
+revenue and expenses that community colleges have had to incur.
+    One, as you mentioned, there has been a decline in 
+enrollment. This means a decline in student fees, tuition, 
+other revenue that colleges collect, as well as the increased 
+cost to going remote or online almost overnight, providing the 
+training to support the faculty, and the direct support to 
+students.
+    So what we've done is work first and foremost with a State, 
+the legislature and the Governor, to make sure that they are 
+aware of those costs, and make sure they are aware of those 
+revenue declines.
+    Fortunately, Governor Newsom and the legislature provided 
+direct support for our colleges and universities, and we've 
+also been working with Congress. We're very appreciative of the 
+aid that you've provided us. I do agree that that aid needs to 
+go to support students, and support the classrooms, so that we 
+can become more resilient.
+    And I think by and large, community colleges across the 
+Nation have done exactly that. They have been on the front 
+lines. They did an amazing job of on a dime, transitioning to 
+remote learning, and that remote learning has had a cost. And 
+so we need to continue to support community colleges like yours 
+in North Carolina, because they do the yeoman's work in 
+supporting those who have been hit hardest by the pandemic.
+    Ms. Manning. Thank you. And as hope is on the horizon and 
+we look toward the post-pandemic world, what steps do you think 
+community colleges can take to reverse those enrollment 
+declines?
+    Mr. Oakley. Well I think given the resources that have been 
+made available, community colleges need to be reaching out 
+directly to their communities, directly to their students, 
+trying to understand what their needs are, ensuring that 
+emergency aid goes directly to them, and working with 
+employers, and community members to provide them the jobs that 
+they need, the hours that they need in order to make ends meet, 
+so that they can continue their education.
+    So I think that is the beauty of community colleges, they 
+are in communities, they work with community members, mayors, 
+employers, that has to be done on steroids in order for us to 
+reach those students.
+    Ms. Manning. Thank you. Let me ask you about another area. 
+I am a former immigration attorney, and the plight of 
+undocumented students is one that is of great concern to me. 
+And I believe we need to find a pathway to citizenship for our 
+DACA students, as well as a pathway to success for all of our 
+future workers.
+    Is this something that you believe we need to address, and 
+do you have any comments on what we can be doing to address 
+this?
+    Mr. Oakley. We absolutely need to address this. California 
+community colleges have over 70,000 DACA students, the largest 
+of any State in the country. These are individuals that serve 
+their communities. They work in their communities. They do 
+everything possible to support their communities, so we need to 
+provide them the support that they need to come out of the 
+shadows, get the education that they need, and contribute 
+meaningfully to the economy, and to support their families.
+    So absolutely, we would implore Congress to codify the DACA 
+program, and to provide a pathway to citizenship.
+    Ms. Manning. Thank you so much sir. I'm going to turn to 
+Mr. Zibel. I recently received an e-mail from a constituent who 
+was very concerned because her non-profit college is being 
+merged with an out of State institution that was formerly a 
+for-profit institution, but is becoming non-profit.
+    And in tracking colleges that convert from for-profit to 
+non-profit status, the Century Foundation found that three non-
+profit schools with the most fraudulent complaints were those 
+that had converted to non-profit status, but have not truly 
+shifted their governance or power structures away from owners 
+who had a financial interest.
+    What are for-profits colleges, or why rather, are for-
+profit colleges increasingly converting to non-profit status, 
+and what role should the Education Department play in ensuring 
+that if they say they're non-profit they actually are?
+    Mr. Zibel. So I see that my time is just about up, if it I 
+may permitted this briefly, I can try and do that. I think the 
+reality is that the department needs to be scrutinizing 
+transactions very, very carefully to make sure that what is a 
+bona fide non-profit, is actually a non-profit and that a for-
+profit is not acting as a non-profit.
+    And I think GAO put out a report about a month and a half 
+ago or so, on this issue, actually said the department was 
+doing a better job of reviewing these and scrutinizing these, 
+but really this isn't a one stop look at a school, it's got to 
+be a long-term constant review to make sure that the people who 
+are profiting before aren't still profiting after the 
+transaction.
+    Ms. Manning. Thank you so much and I yield back.
+    Chairwoman Wilson. Thank you so much, thank you. I know 
+it's hard remotely. Next we'll hear from Mr. Comer of Kentucky.
+    Mr. Comer. Thank you Madam Chair, and I'm going to wear 
+both my committee hats with these questions, my Education 
+Committee as well the Oversight Committee. Over the last few 
+years Congress has appropriated record levels of funding to 
+universities and many universities are using it well.
+    For instance, universities in my district have really 
+focused on trying to provide educational opportunities that are 
+focused on the workforce, and what the regional employers want 
+and need and offer the best paying jobs.
+    Kalamazoo University is a great example. They've adapted 
+the certification process then I have some communities 
+colleges--Henderson Community College, Madisonville Community 
+Colleges, working on some really innovative workforce 
+development type programs that are in need.
+    So the funds that have been invested in those programs 
+obviously have been well-spent, however there are valid 
+concerns that in many other instances, many of the universities 
+didn't serve the students with the best possible outcome and in 
+their best interest about the taxpayers and the student.
+    Last year the Trump administration issued a ruling 
+clarifying that only Title IV eligible students qualify to 
+receive emergency student aid funding provided by the CARES Act 
+and COVID relief. The rule is currently held up in the court 
+process. My question is for Dr. Burke. Do you think the rule 
+was consistent with other practices related to Federal student 
+aid? I'll stop there.
+    Ms. Burke. Thank you Representative Comer. I do think it is 
+consistent. These funds are open just to students who are Title 
+IV eligible, that's consistent not only with Title IV broadly, 
+but it's also consistent with other prior practices. If you 
+look at the 1996 Welfare Reform Act for example, that limited 
+public assistance programs to most legal immigrants for five 
+years, or until they attained citizenship.
+    So there's precedent there as well, not only in the 
+existing Title IV program, but also in the '96 Act.
+    Mr. Comer. Dr. Burke what's the most responsible way 
+institutions can direct these emergency student aid dollars?
+    Ms. Burke. Yes, right. So it's a great question. They 
+really should target it toward students who are in the most 
+need of that spending. And many of these dollars are flowing to 
+universities based on the proportion of students who are Pell 
+eligible, and so there is that built in system in place already 
+which was a good step in the right direction I think, a good 
+safeguard to put into place.
+    But making sure that you know at the university level, 
+they're not just giving a blanket across the board aid to every 
+student in the institution of you know $1,000.00 or whatever it 
+might be, but actually assessing those students who are in need 
+at the university level.
+    Mr. Comer. Great. Let me shift gears and talk about COVID-
+19 that the health and educational institutions adapt to meet 
+the challenges of COVID-19, that the Department of Education 
+and Congress provided many of these institutions temporary 
+relief from a lot of regulatory burdens.
+    Dr. Burke are there any related modified regulations or 
+guidance that Congress should re-evaluate as institutions are 
+planning for future semesters?
+    Ms. Burke. Sure thank you. So as I mentioned earlier I 
+think there are a few regulations that are in place that do 
+deserve a second look. That elastic clause that I mentioned in 
+my opening testimony, I know it sounds like a very specific 
+reform, but right now that enables accreditors to layer on 
+numerous additional requirements on a university. Just a 
+hypothetical, if an accreditor wanted to mandate a dress code, 
+it's not outside of the scope of that elastic clause.
+    And so removing that clause to keep what accreditors can do 
+solely focused on the metrics that are contained within the 
+statute of the HEA would be a very good step in the right 
+direction.
+    Mr. Comer. OK. That's good to know. Dr. Foxx, and Fred 
+Keller, and myself are all on the Oversight Committee. We're 
+really focused on the regulatory process and the change of 
+administration has brought a lot of regulatory changes and 
+uncertainty in a lot of different industries and education 
+would be right in there.
+    So we relaxed a lot of regulations during COVID, and in 
+many cases that worked out very well. And I would like to make 
+a lot of those relaxed regulations permanent. Obviously, we 
+always have to look at the regulatory process, and education is 
+no different. So I appreciate that. And Madam Chair I 
+appreciate the hearing, and look forward to future hearings, 
+and appreciate our witnesses for being here today. I yield 
+back.
+    Chairwoman Wilson. Thank you so much. Thank you. And now 
+we'll hear from Mr. Bowman of New York, who is the new Vice 
+Chair of the full Education and Labor Committee, welcome. Proud 
+of you.
+    Mr. Bowman. Thank you Madam Chair, and thank you to all the 
+witnesses for being here today. My question is for Mr. 
+Thornton. I'm going to start with Mr. Thornton. During your 
+testimony you mentioned that at one point you didn't feel that 
+college was for you, or you didn't feel that you were college 
+material. I know I'm paraphrasing here.
+    Can you speak to why that was? Like why did you have that 
+feeling at that time?
+    Mr. Thornton. Yes. Thank you so much for that Mr. Bowman. 
+And the reason why I felt that way, so this was my freshman 
+year. And coming into school, honestly, things began to get a 
+little rough for me personally, primarily with school, being 
+able to maintain the focus on being able to uphold to the 
+standard of being able to achieve the school curriculum in 
+terms of you know the certain classes, excuse me, that I had to 
+take.
+    So with that constant pressure, me putting pressure on 
+myself and even with outside pressure that was not necessarily 
+intentional with three of my sisters are going to college, all 
+of them obtaining their master's degrees.
+    I personally had some pressure that I felt in myself with 
+having to reach those goals and attain that degree. And even 
+with being able to not fail, and feeling like I didn't want to 
+put my family's money at risk of just being wasted because of 
+where I was at.
+    So that's kind of the reason as to why. Those are some of 
+the thoughts I was having internally as far as being able to 
+stay in school.
+    Mr. Bowman. Yes I know what you mean. I have three sisters 
+as well, and raised by a single mom. So I know the pressure 
+that the women in our lives put on us.
+    Mr. Thornton. Yes.
+    Mr. Bowman. To reach their standard. So how did you 
+overcome it? You know what did the university provide to you in 
+terms of advisers, in terms of academic support, what have you, 
+how did you overcome that pressure and that feeling that you 
+didn't belong? And how were you able to set yourself right?
+    Mr. Thornton. Yes of course. So when it came down to 
+referring whether I did, it took me having to speak up, rather 
+than waiting for something or for someone to come to me and ask 
+me how I was doing. So it took me reaching out to, as I 
+mentioned, you know, a TRIO program instructor, Ms. Tiffany 
+Tyler, who has played a huge role in my life, reaching out to 
+her, speaking to her about some of these things.
+    Her guiding me and really encouraging me to continue to 
+push forward, and even my counterparts, my peers within the 
+university. I've built long-lasting relationship through the 
+TRIO program as I've mentioned 5000 Role Models as well.
+    And even you know I'm part of a club here on campus as 
+well. Having those people in my life, and just speaking and 
+sharing my heart, sharing my life with them. There are times 
+where I was able to do homework with them, study with them, and 
+it really just pushed me to stay in school to think about the 
+future, the ways in which I can have an impact in the world 
+with a degree.
+    So you know having people in my life was a huge component 
+of me deciding that this is something that I can do, and 
+something that I will do, and that's kind of you know pushed me 
+to where I am today getting ready to graduate. So that's been a 
+huge motivator for me.
+    Mr. Bowman. Thank you so much for sharing that. You're an 
+inspiration to me personally, and to all of us, so please keep 
+going brother. I appreciate you. Chancellor Oakley, since the 
+onset of COVID-19 there has been an increased demand from 
+mental health services as students deal with trauma, and 
+economic and health crises, in addition to managing their 
+school work.
+    Chancellor, how have your institutions managed this 
+increased need?
+    Mr. Oakley. Thank you for that question Congressman. The 
+mental health toll that the pandemic and the economic fallout 
+has taken on our students has been significant. Many of them 
+are in communities where we have had not only the economic 
+impact of COVID-19, the health impacts because many of those 
+communities lacked access to quality healthcare, but also the 
+racial reckoning that has gripped this country, happens in the 
+communities that we serve.
+    So all those things have come together. We have been 
+working with the Newsom administration and our legislature to 
+gain access to resources that help fund mental health services. 
+Our legislature has provided some of those resources. We are 
+working with counties and cities to share resources, to make 
+sure that our students have access to those mental health 
+resources, but they are only a drop in the bucket.
+    And this is an area where Congress also has been helpful 
+because some of those relief funds have been used to provide 
+that kind of assistance, that kind of support to our students 
+who need it critically right now for them to continue their 
+education.
+    Mr. Bowman. Thank you for that. Mr. Zibel, though 
+enrollment is trending down at community colleges, the reverse 
+is true for for-profit colleges. While for-profit colleges saw 
+substantial and consistent enrollment drops in the years 
+leading up to the pandemic, the sections enrollment spiked up 
+last fall.
+    This appears to be a pattern as for-profit colleges have 
+saw a similar enrollment spike after the Great Recession. Do 
+you have any concerns with these trends, and what lessons can 
+we learn from the years following the Great Recession?
+    Chairwoman Wilson. Mr. Vice Chair your time is up.
+    Mr. Bowman. Oh sorry, thank you.
+    Chairwoman Wilson. Thank you. Someone else--he'll probably 
+answer it in another question from another Member. Thank you so 
+much. We'll now go to Ms. Spartz of Indiana.
+    Ms. Spartz. Thank you Madam Chair. I just have a question 
+to all the panel. You know we all agree we have a lot of 
+problems and challenges in higher ed. I was a college faculty 
+myself, and I also taught in public accounting college. It was 
+a national team, a trainer for several other accounting firms. 
+We had a lot of talk, a lot of discussions, a lot of different 
+performances, so I understand it.
+    We need to have better return on investment, following 
+investments in human capital. Colleges need to have skin in the 
+game, and we need to have better outcomes, not worthless 
+diplomas, none of that, inflated grades and all these things 
+and now the kids are not ready to life-long learning.
+    So my question is we had lots of talk, lots of discussion, 
+proposal but nothing ever gets done. So my question is, and 
+I'll start with Dr. Burke, is there any prospects where 
+actually something gets done, or we'll be discussing for next 
+10 years how we're going to reform higher ed and nothing is 
+going to happen.
+    So what are your thoughts on the prospect of anything 
+happening in the near future.
+    Ms. Burke. Thank you for that question Congresswoman 
+Spartz. So I think the prospect for reforms like moving on 
+either short-term Pell, or enabling students to use their Title 
+IV funds for shorter term courses. I think the prospects are 
+pretty good for that in terms of bipartisan support overall.
+    There are, of course, some inherent concerns with some of 
+these proposals that you don't increase spending overall on 
+these programs when you enable those dollars to flow to shorter 
+term courses, but I think that there are ways to structure 
+those reforms to make sure that the cap remains tight, but 
+still enable students to have more flexibility and to make 
+those dollars more nimble.
+    Ms. Spartz. But I'm talking about better outcomes in all 
+postsecondary education, so having real reform when we 
+understand that you know, we should bring some value right? If 
+we're going to invest in human capital, and use taxpayers money 
+particularly to do that, we need to have a return on 
+investment.
+    And colleges need to have skin in the game, and they 
+shouldn't be piling up all this debt on these kids, a lot of 
+them, with no jobs right? Because I only care if you have a 
+job, and you have some meaningful employment that it brings 
+some value.
+    So is there any prospect of having that ever accomplished?
+    Ms. Burke. So I do think that there is some agreement that 
+in general the current metrics for example, the cohort default 
+rate, are just really not cutting it in terms of providing the 
+data that we need and the, you know, oversight that we need for 
+some of these institutions.
+    And so there are conversations that are happening about 
+changing that metric to something maybe closer to a 
+programmatic default rate that could work better. There is 
+still going to be problems inherent in that approach as well, 
+and so to my mind it all comes back to the fact that we are 
+even having this conversation because Federal taxpayers are 
+implicated, and financing so much of the higher education 
+system today.
+    So winding down the debt in the student loan program, I 
+think is a necessary precondition for reigning in costs and 
+providing some needed accountability.
+    Ms. Spartz. Yes our colleges do have to have skin in the 
+game too.
+    Ms. Burke. Yes.
+    Ms. Spartz. So I'm sure. Dr. And Mr. Zibel and Mr. Oakley, 
+and maybe Mr. Thornton quickly. Do you think there is any 
+prospect of meaningful reform in the near future? Yes, no, 
+because I'm not sure how much time I have left.
+    Mr. Zibel. I actually think there is Congresswoman, and 
+especially you know if you talk about skin in the game, and 
+making sure that there's value.
+    I think one of the most important things that 
+administration can do is bring back the Gainful Employment 
+Rule, which was designed to solve exactly the kind of problems 
+that you were just referring to where students are graduating 
+from programs without any prospect of employment in 
+relationship to the amount of debt that they are taking.
+    Secretary DeVos repealed that rule. And you know I'm 
+hopeful that the Department of Education can bring it back, and 
+actually give it time to work going forward.
+    Ms. Spartz. Mr. Oakley?
+    Mr. Oakley. Short answer is yes. I see a lot of reform 
+happening. The fact that you have a person from a community 
+college testifying today means that things are changing, that 
+we are recognizing the value that institutions like community 
+colleges provide to the country. So I'm very hopeful and I see 
+a lot of change in California.
+    Ms. Spartz. OK. Well hopefully we'll stay optimistic and 
+get some hope. Mr. Thornton what do you think? You're probably 
+new to all this.
+    Mr. Thornton. Yes I definitely am new to all this. But I 
+would say that I do have hope and faith that there will be a 
+change moving forward in the future. I'm excited to see how 
+things continue to grow and to progress as Mr. Oakley attested 
+to. You know, him coming from a community college background I 
+think is amazing just to see him here now, and just even having 
+that same dream and hope for other people that were in his 
+position.
+    So I definitely feel good moving forward to see some 
+changes in America.
+    Ms. Spartz. OK thank you. I will stay hopeful, and I'll 
+yield back.
+    Chairwoman Wilson. Thank you. Thank you so much. And a 
+veteran Member of the committee now, I yield to Mr. Pocan. How 
+are you, Wisconsin.
+    Mr. Pocan. Very good thank you Madam Chair, and I 
+appreciate. Thanks to the witnesses, and my apologies to 
+everyone for coming back and forth. Every vote we have is 45 
+minutes. Unfortunately, we have about 100 colleagues who have 
+not been vaccinated so we can't shorten the time period, and 
+it's chaotic because of it. So my apologies up front.
+    A very quick yes/no question Dr. Burke. I'm hoping, I'm not 
+sure if I heard something right. Were you just talking about 
+winding down the student loan programs? Is that a yes or no in 
+the near future?
+    Ms. Burke. Yes.
+    Mr. Pocan. OK yes. Thank you. I'll move on. So Mr. 
+Thornton. I was someone who when I went to school I grew up in 
+a lower middle class family, got lots of student loans, Pell 
+Grants, things that Ms. Burke apparently doesn't like.
+    And that's why I was able to go to college, and get a 
+degree and appreciate, you know, what you're talking about 
+right now and the support that you got. I think also part of 
+the testimony was that all this money went to the 
+administrative ether at universities, but I assume you like me, 
+don't consider our lives administrative ether.
+    You talked a little bit in your opening remarks about how 
+some of the support from the programs that we've done with 
+COVID helped you very directly to be able to continue to be 
+able to go to school. Can you talk a little more, just a little 
+more about that, or about any friend's stories also that have 
+been helped because of the programs that Congress did around 
+COVID?
+    Mr. Thornton. Yes. Thank you so much for that Mr. Pocan. 
+And I could speak for myself personally, kind of like what I 
+mentioned as far as the last semester, the fall semester that 
+just passed. Me initially having a job, me being able to take 
+care of myself financially, whether it be with school expenses, 
+or expenses outside of school whether it was rent or bills.
+    Me losing my job put me in a position to where I just 
+really had to take a lot from my personal savings, so with the 
+funding that was provided I was able to provide for myself in 
+different ways, primarily with school and you know school 
+materials.
+    And in addition to that things outside of school. So the 
+funding that was provided definitely played a huge role in my 
+life personally, and you know I could definitely speak about 
+that for sure.
+    Mr. Pocan. Thank you. What's your major by the way? I don't 
+know if I caught that because we're always back and forth. I 
+didn't catch that.
+    Mr. Thornton. Oh yes of course. My major is recreation and 
+sports management.
+    Mr. Pocan. Awesome. Well I wish you great fortune with 
+that, and thanks so much for being here and sharing your 
+stories. A question for Chancellor Oakley. You know we just had 
+a staff assistant position open in my office. We got 330 
+applications for it, and we noticed a lot of them graduated in 
+May 2020 and have not had a job since then, obviously because 
+of COVID.
+    Is there anything that universities are doing, or should be 
+doing to kind of help that student, that this year has been an 
+incredibly tough year? Many of them probably are living back 
+home because we noticed the addresses are from around the 
+country. But what can we do to help those students, because you 
+know, I'm glad that they were able to get the education, but I 
+know the next connecting step is to a good job.
+    Mr. Oakley. So very quickly. I mean working with employers, 
+working with industries to provide for some type of paid 
+internship I think is critical for all college graduates to 
+have the opportunity to get into the workforce as soon as 
+things start to open up.
+    It's critically important that college students have access 
+to have the skills that they need, but also in terms of what 
+they need to do the work, but how to exist in a place of 
+employment. So I think we need to double our efforts to help 
+students get some sort of workforce opportunity, internship or 
+other paid workforce training.
+    Mr. Pocan. Great. Thank you. And then a final followup if I 
+can because I have to go to vote on this series now. It has to 
+do with Dr. Burke's question that we need to wind down our 
+financial aid programs, that there's just too much of a largess 
+out there.
+    Mr. Oakley. Well I think we agree on the umbrella which is 
+there is too much debt. I do think that we need to continue to 
+improve the amount of resources that we're providing to the 
+lowest income Americans and help them pay for the cost of 
+attending college which continues to increase.
+    Mr. Pocan. And that includes more Pell I would assume.
+    Mr. Oakley. Absolutely.
+    Mr. Pocan. Great. Thank you very much. I yield back Madam 
+Chair.
+    Chairwoman Wilson. Thank you, thank you. According to my 
+records Ms. Harshbarger of Tennessee you can go on the record. 
+Mr. Fulcher of Idaho? Ms. Stefanik of New York? Mr. Banks of 
+Indiana? Ms. Omar of Minnesota.
+    Ms. Omar. Thank you very much chairwoman, and thanks to all 
+our witnesses for joining us. To Mr. Pocan's point it's been a 
+really busy day, so I do apologize if some of the questions I 
+ask have already been asked of you. Even before the COVID-19 
+pandemic hit, there were many students who were struggling to 
+cover the cost of basic needs like housing, food and childcare.
+    The COVID-19 pandemic has added to many of the hurdles 
+faced by minority and low-income students working to complete 
+their college educations. And these challenges are compounded 
+for student parents.
+    A recent report including the GAO study, has highlighted 
+the challenges that a student parents face in terms of college 
+persistence and completion. Madam Chair I request unanimous 
+consent to enter this into the record.
+    Chairwoman Wilson. So ordered.
+    Ms. Omar. Chancellor Oakley, how have child center closures 
+affected the ability of student parents to remain in school?
+    Mr. Oakley. This has had a devastating effect on our 
+students, and thank you for that question Congresswoman. This 
+has had a devastating effect. So many of our students in the 
+California community colleges, and this is true of community 
+colleges across the Nation, are working parents.
+    And so lack of access to childcare, and the fact that so 
+many of them have had their children in their household having 
+to work on educating them remotely, sharing Wi-Fi with them, 
+all of these have created challenges that have made it very 
+difficult for working parents to continue their education.
+    Ms. Omar. I appreciate that. I was a working parent when I 
+completed my college education, and so I'm wondering if there 
+is any support that colleges are providing currently to this 
+vulnerable student group, and if you have any recommendations 
+for Congress to provide support.
+    Mr. Oakley. Well I think right now the most important thing 
+to do is to provide these working parents, these students, 
+direct emergency support. They need economic support right now, 
+so that when they're making choices about whether to feed their 
+family, or to continue to enroll in college, we don't force 
+them into those choices.
+    So I think we need them to participate in the economy. We 
+need them to complete their education, so I think investing 
+directly in supporting these working students is critical to 
+our future, and to an equitable recovery.
+    Ms. Omar. And how do you see the creation of an environment 
+that does set these students up for success post-COVID?
+    Mr. Oakley. So I think it's critical that we work with 
+employers, that we work with labor organizations that support 
+these working parents to focus on insuring that we provide what 
+they need to get into jobs that pay a livable wage so they can 
+support their families.
+    Ms. Omar. I appreciate that. Madam Chair I will yield back.
+    Chairwoman Wilson. Thank you so much. I see Mr. Fulcher 
+from Idaho's camera on. I'm not sure if he is available? We'll 
+go now to Ms. Sherrill of New Jersey? Mr. Espaillat of New 
+York? Mr. Grijalva of Arizona? And a true, true veteran of the 
+Education Committee Mr. Courtney of Connecticut, he's here.
+    Mr. Courtney. Thank you Chairwoman Wilson, and thank you to 
+all the witnesses. Keith, your testimony has been really 
+stellar, and you know, congratulations to you and the Chairman 
+for the great work that you and her work in terms of you know, 
+creating these kinds of pathways for young people.
+    Mr. Zibel I have actually been watching a little bit out of 
+the corner of my eye during the hearing. Chairman Powell from 
+the Federal Reserve is sort of giving his sort of update 
+regarding the economy, and announced that again, the sort of 
+low interest rate, zero percent policy--monetary policy, of the 
+Federal Reserve is actually going to continue through 2023.
+    I mean a very I think, you know forceful policy position to 
+keep borrowing costs down. And as we know, you know, for the 
+last year that's been the policy, and people in the private 
+sector have benefited greatly from it. You know residential 
+property owners, credit card debt, car loan debt, but you know 
+the one form of debt that is still stuck with the higher 
+interest rates is student loan debt.
+    And you know President Biden's pause, which is a good thing 
+in terms of helping people's cash-flow, who are student loan 
+borrowers, that expires at the end of September 2021. And so, 
+you know, potentially you know those higher interest rates are 
+going to snap back into place.
+    Again, even if there is student loan forgiveness of 
+$10,000.00 or $50,000.00, there's still going to be a lot of 
+debt left over there. And so you know I was wondering if you 
+could sort of talk about it from a consumer point of view. I 
+mean the only decisionmaker that can change that is Congress.
+    That's pretty well understood as the President really is 
+not a unilateral authority under the Higher Education 
+Authorization to cut rates by himself, and we've done that a 
+number of times over you know the time that Frederica and I 
+have been in Congress.
+    You know it just seems like it screams out for action by 
+Congress not to let these interest rates snap back, and first 
+to do something about taking advantage of the low interest rate 
+environment. And I was wondering if you could comment on that.
+    Mr. Zibel. Certainly, Congressman. It's an excellent 
+question and I should caveat this was you know I'm not an 
+economist. I'm a lawyer. But you know, just as a matter of 
+principle I think that everything you are saying makes a lot of 
+sense. There is no reason why student loan borrowers should be 
+saddled with higher interest rates than you know, other 
+financial products.
+    I think Congress would be well to look at reforms to the 
+Bankruptcy Code. Student loans are not dischargeable in 
+bankruptcy for the most part, and that is something that I 
+think both the administration and Congress could be taking a 
+look at to really try and bring relief to borrowers who are 
+struggling so immensely right now.
+    Mr. Courtney. Well thank you. Again we've tried actually in 
+the last few Congresses, myself, Frederica and others have you 
+know cosponsored bills to bring down the interest rates. And 
+again, given Chairman Powell's announcement today, I mean it 
+really is more than high time for us to move out and create 
+some parody in terms of lending costs for people with student 
+loan debt.
+    And you know Mr. Oakley, I don't know if you have any sort 
+of comment on that. I realize maybe you know the interest rate 
+issue for current students is not as urgent, but certainly you 
+know, later in life it could really pose a real hindrance on 
+their success.
+    Mr. Oakley. Well absolutely. I mean all the things that 
+were just mentioned, and I certainly support Mr. Zibel's 
+characterization of the challenge. We need Congress to act to 
+support students who do have to take out these loans by 
+reducing the interest rate, by allowing them to go through 
+bankruptcy court.
+    So these are issues that saddle our students for decades. 
+And in many ways keep them from participating meaningful in the 
+American economy, and from creating wealth.
+    Mr. Courtney. Great. Well thank you. You know just to share 
+with the committee and the witnesses, I had a constituent who 
+emailed the other day about a student loan bill that he 
+received, which again was paying 7.8 percent interest. Again, 
+totally trapped.
+    And there was a warning quote in there that only the U.S. 
+Congress can lower that rate. Because you know I'm sure that 
+the loan servicer is getting bombarded with questions about why 
+do I still have to pay 7.8 percent interest when you know, 
+everything else is you know close to zero.
+    And I think you know they're basically saying call your 
+Congressman. So hopefully, you know, more people will talk 
+about that, because it really is something that we as a 
+committee should take a look at. And with that I yield back 
+Madam Chairwoman.
+    Chairwoman Wilson. Thank you very much. Mr. Fulcher I see 
+from Idaho, I see you back and forth. You are on camera. You're 
+next. Mr. Fulcher are you going to join us? If not we'll go to 
+Ms. Bonamici.
+    Ms. Bonamici. Thank you Madam Chair. And thank you to all 
+the witnesses. In particular, I want to thank Mr. Thornton. 
+Thank you so much for sharing your experience. It's really 
+helpful for us to learn from. I also want to not let it go 
+unsaid that there are with regard to Dr. Burke's comments about 
+limiting borrowing based on someone's course of study, multiple 
+issues and problems with that, particularly from the equity 
+perspective.
+    And very subjective who makes that decision, and you know, 
+just take a look someday at what philosophy majors make. 
+They're very successful because they know how to think 
+critically, and employers are looking for skills like empathy 
+and teamwork, and problem solving. Those are all things that 
+come from studying broad fields, including the humanities.
+    So I want to turn to Chancellor Oakley. Nice to see you 
+again. We know there are serious inequities in higher 
+education, and that's true in Oregon and across the country 
+even before the COVID-19 pandemic, and students were already 
+struggling to cover not just the cost of tuition, but we know 
+other expenses, housing, transportation, childcare, food.
+    Now there are unexpected costs because of the pandemic 
+adding to it. And particularly for community college students 
+like I was, these costs are significantly higher than the costs 
+of tuition. So Chancellor Oakley, recent reports including a 
+GAO study have highlighted food and housing insecurity, and I 
+have spoken with college students, particularly community 
+college students in Oregon about this.
+    I'd like to enter the GAO report into the record Madam 
+Chair.
+    Chairwoman Wilson. So ordered.
+    Ms. Bonamici. Thank you. So Chancellor, how are the 
+California community colleges providing for example, case 
+management and services to low-income students, and how are you 
+connecting them with resources like those that are available 
+through SNAP, WIC and TANF? And how are you making sure the 
+students access those resources while they're not physically on 
+campus?
+    Mr. Oakley. Thank you for that question Congresswoman 
+Bonamici. You are absolutely right. There was a huge crisis in 
+our system before the pandemic. We saw record amounts of food 
+insecurity. Record amounts of housing insecurity and the 
+pandemic has significantly exacerbated the problem.
+    So we have been working first and foremost, we are a 
+community college, we are working with cities, with non-profit 
+institutions, in localities where we exist in providing support 
+for our students.
+    We've provided support for technology, for food through 
+food pantries, and things of that nature. We've also worked 
+with our legislature and Governor Newsom to provide emergency 
+aid. Just a few weeks ago the legislature passed an emergency 
+action package that provides emergency support directly to 
+students, which will support their needs for food and housing 
+insecurity, as well as mental health services and other things 
+that are impacting them right now.
+    We've also continued to advocate to you all, to Congress, 
+and to this new administration of the need to provide this 
+direct emergency support. I understand----
+    Ms. Bonamici. Chancellor, I don't want to interrupt but I--
+--
+    Mr. Oakley. That's quite all right.
+    Ms. Bonamici. ----I have a consumer protection background, 
+so I absolutely must get a question in for Mr. Zibel. Thank you 
+so much for being here. The Obama administration as you know, 
+established the Borrower Defense Rule to streamline the process 
+for students to assert their right to loan forgiveness when 
+they're defrauded by the institution.
+    Unfortunately, the Trump administration failed to implement 
+the rule and give students the relief they deserve. So what can 
+the Biden administration do immediately to address the problems 
+with Borrower Defense that were created by the past 
+administration?
+    Mr. Zibel. Sure. Thank you for the question. There is a lot 
+the department can do, and I think most immediately it's taking 
+the issue seriously, providing relief, 100 percent relief to 
+the borrowers who it has already determined to have been 
+defrauded by a predatory college.
+    There is simply no excuse at this point in time for the 
+department dragging its heels on that. I want to, you know the 
+consequences for these borrowers, it's devastating for them for 
+an economic impact, housing impact, mental health impacts.
+    But the other point that I want to emphasize on this is 
+that these are borrowers who really feel like not only did 
+their school fail them, but their government failed them. Their 
+government failed them by putting a seal of approval on these 
+schools, leading them down a path, and then not giving 
+forgiveness, even though they've already made sufficient 
+findings to do so.
+    Ms. Bonamici. In my remaining few seconds, just to followup 
+on that. Some of my colleagues on the other side of the aisle 
+were talking about complaining about what they call 
+administrative bloat. But actually some of the worst bloat I'm 
+aware of is when colleges use Federal funds to advertise for 
+perspective students.
+    Recent data indicates that colleges spend 730 million 
+dollars on advertising and degree granting for-profit 
+institutions, and that's you know 40 percent of all higher 
+education advertising spending for just 6 percent of the 
+students, so that is something that I would say is 
+administrative bloat we should be looking at is what the for-
+profits institutions are doing to try to recruit on often-times 
+students.
+    So I see my time is over, and I yield back. Thank you Madam 
+Chair.
+    Chairwoman Wilson. Thank you. You have a lot of seniority 
+but your time is up. And now Mr. Scott, esteemed Chairman of 
+the entire committee on Education and Labor. Do you want to 
+close us out?
+    Mr. Scott. I'll try. Thank you very much. Let me first ask 
+Ms. Burke you mentioned we talked about short-term Pell's, but 
+I think there's a consensus that this is a good idea. The only 
+caveat we have is people open up little storefronts and 
+stealing all the money, dealing out worthless credentials.
+    We want to limit those privately to community colleges, and 
+referrals from job training, workforce investment, Opportunity 
+Act boards. Do you think that would be sufficient to keep these 
+in the hands of those that are actually using them well?
+    Ms. Burke. I think coupled with some State accreditation 
+reform efforts as in enabling states to make some determination 
+about which industries within their state could provide those 
+short-term courses. I think that would be a good step in the 
+right direction to actually push it down to the State level, 
+that oversight role, in terms of quality assurance of these 
+programs.
+    Mr. Scott. Thank you. And let me ask Dr. Oakley. We have a 
+lot of suggestions on how to spend a lot of money on colleges, 
+and could you give us an idea of your priorities talking about 
+either free college, or free community college, double the Pell 
+Grant, loan discharge programs like public service loan 
+forgiveness, a borrower defense, or income contingent, or 
+discharging loans $10,000.00 or $50,000.00, or eliminate 
+interest on loans.
+    Could you tell us what we ought to be looking at first?
+    Mr. Oakley. Thank you Mr. Chair. First of all I mean all of 
+those issues are important issues to our students, but for us I 
+mean first and foremost allowing students to pay for the total 
+cost of attending college is critical, so that they can attend 
+full-time, so that they can complete their education and get 
+into the workforce.
+    So things like doubling Pell is critically important. Free 
+community college is certainly important, so that the funds 
+that you make available can be spent on the total cost of 
+attending college. And then finally I'd say supporting 
+colleges, community colleges in particular to reach out to 
+displaced workers, and helping get the skills that they need to 
+get back into the workforce.
+    Mr. Scott. We've heard a couple of comments about the 
+interest rates. What about significantly reducing, or even 
+eliminating interest. Why is the Federal Government charging 
+people interest? We ought to be subsidizing loans, not using it 
+as a profit center.
+    Mr. Oakley. Well I would certainly agree that a low or no 
+interest loans to our students who are struggling and who need 
+that support to get into the economy is a very important step 
+that Congress could take.
+    Mr. Scott. Thank you. Mr. Zibel during the Obama 
+administration the Department of Education worked with the 
+State law enforcement agencies, especially attorneys general to 
+investigate and hold for-profit colleges accountable. Can you 
+talk about what happened during the last 4 years, and whether 
+or not executives at for-profit colleges should be held 
+personally liable for misconduct, or financial losses to 
+students and taxpayers?
+    Mr. Zibel. Certainly, Mr. Chairman. Look, the Department of 
+Education has to be working alongside State and other Federal 
+partners. This should not be an adversarial relationship, as I 
+think it has been over the past 4 years. In terms of 
+institutional enforcement I see what the Department of 
+Education did in the Corinthian colleges matter.
+    It's a real example of when the department worked alongside 
+the office of then Attorney General Kamala Harris to bring an 
+enforcement action, and take an action against one of the most 
+predatory actors.
+    When schools are closing, the department has to be working 
+with states to make sure that student needs are met in terms of 
+transfers, and transcript availability and basic needs around 
+housing.
+    So I think that is a real important step that the 
+department has to be taking going forward. In terms of personal 
+liability, I think I mentioned a little bit earlier, 
+absolutely. This is not a proposal that we have come up with. 
+This is not a proposal that must have been developed in the 
+past year or two, this is something that Congress put into the 
+Higher Education Act about 30 years ago.
+    And you know President George H.W. Bush signed it into law. 
+It was passed by a bipartisan Congress. And I think that the 
+concept is really simple. That when there are institutions that 
+cause losses to students and taxpayers, they should be held 
+accountable, and the individuals that directed that conduct 
+should be held accountable.
+    The Securities and Exchange Commission for example does it 
+even for for-profit college executives about protecting 
+investors. But for some reason the Department of Education has 
+not done that to protect students.
+    So this is about deterring misconduct. If you know that you 
+personally may have to write a check at the end of the day, you 
+are probably going to be a lot better of a steward of a 
+taxpayer and student funds.
+    Mr. Scott. Thank you. And thank you Madam Chair. And I want 
+to thank Keith for being with us today. He's certainly an 
+example of why we're here. And certainly, a shining example of 
+why the 5,000 Role Models of Excellence are so important. So 
+thank you Keith for being with us today.
+    Chairwoman Wilson. Thank you. Thank you so much Mr. Chair. 
+I remind my colleagues that pursuant to committee practice, 
+materials for submission of the hearing record must be 
+submitted to the Committee Clerk within 14 days following the 
+last day of the hearing.
+    So by close of business on March 31, 2021 preferably in 
+Microsoft Word format. The materials submitted must address the 
+subject matter of the hearing. Only a Member of the 
+subcommittee, or an invited witness may submit materials for 
+inclusion in the hearing record.
+    Documents are limited to 50 pages each. Documents longer 
+than 50 pages will be incorporated into the record by way of an 
+internet link that you must provide to the Committee Clerk 
+within the required timeframe.
+    But please recognize that in the future that link may no 
+longer work. Pursuant to House rules and regulations, items for 
+the record must be submitted to the Clerk electronically by 
+email submissions to [email protected].
+    Members are encouraged to submit materials to the inbox 
+before the hearing, or during the hearing at the time the 
+Member makes the request. Again, I want to thank the witnesses 
+for their participation today. Keith you have made FIU, Miami-
+Dade County Public Schools so proud.
+    We love you. 5,000 Role Models love you. We are 5,000. I 
+want to thank you, all of the witnesses. You were absolutely 
+stupendous. You did a great job at our committee today. Members 
+of the subcommittee may have some additional questions for each 
+of you and we ask the witnesses to please respond to those 
+questions in writing.
+    The hearing record will be held open for 14 days in order 
+to receive those responses. I remind my colleagues that 
+pursuant to committee practice witness questions for the 
+hearing record, must be submitted to the Majority Committee 
+Staff or Committee Clerk within 7 days. The questions submitted 
+must address the subject matter of the hearing.
+    We're now into closing statements. I recognize the 
+Distinguished Ranking Member for a closing statement, Dr. 
+Murphy who is a medical doctor.
+    Mr. Murphy. Thank you Ms. Representative Wilson. I want to 
+thank you especially, but also thank the committee Members and 
+the panelists. I think this was an excellent, excellent 
+meeting, and a lot of good issues discussed.
+    And I think there was a lot of lessons learned today. Both 
+Democrats and Republicans, I think we agree. We agree very 
+plainly that our postsecondary education system is in need of 
+reform. I mean I think that I can say that without any doubt. 
+Everybody knows that things have got a little bit out of hand.
+    Where the reform may be, may be in question, and difference 
+of opinion about and amongst the panelists and the committee, 
+but I think reform my all means is a consensus statement.
+    College costs are obviously way too high, and continue to 
+rise. We simply cannot continue the rise of college costs as 
+they are today. We are bankrupting our students. We are doing a 
+disservice to our taxpayers. We simply cannot allow that. 
+Graduation rates are low, honestly embarrassingly low.
+    I look at some institutions 6 year graduation rates are in 
+the teens, and that's not acceptable. We're doing a disservice 
+to those students, and again to the taxpayers. Employers are 
+finding recent graduates, college graduates, ill-prepared for 
+college success. And that burden rests solely on our educators.
+    If these kids are paying so much and mortgaging their 
+future, our educators have the burden of making sure that 
+they're prepared and that their money was well-spent. You don't 
+continue the status quo. You don't continue to pour money into 
+programs that have been proven failures. They're not failing 
+because of lack of money. They're failing because they were bad 
+and poorly designed programs.
+    Congress acted quickly last year in a bipartisan fashion to 
+help the sector deal with the pandemic. I was very, very proud 
+to be a Member of Congress at that time because we saw the 
+American people, and we saw institutions in America as needing 
+our help and we got together in a bipartisan manner.
+    Most recently, not so bipartisan, and that's in my opinion, 
+a real shame that that occurred. But now Congress has to turn 
+to long-term issues. The Higher Education Act is in dire need 
+of reform to better serve our students. The disaster, and I 
+spoke about this earlier, of the rise of administrative bloat 
+must be reversed.
+    We cannot continue pouring money into institutions that do 
+not use it toward education and preparing our students for 
+success and lifelong learning. Some policy solutions have been 
+presented at the hearing, eliminate the Grad Plus Program, 
+allow institutions to limit borrowing on a programmatic basis, 
+an entrance into the marketplace by enabling short-term Pell 
+Grants and reforming the accreditation system, and also--and a 
+recent topic, I think reforming the interest rates on these 
+loans. By all means, I think that needs to be done, especially 
+with what we're talking about with zero rates.
+    I don't think loan forgiveness. All you're doing is passing 
+that on to individuals who actually paid for their education, 
+who actually worked for their education, I don't think that is 
+appropriate.
+    Not all of the ideas are bipartisan, by all means. But I 
+want to encourage the subcommittee to work to find workable 
+solutions under Madam Wilson's leadership, and I have pledged 
+to work together in a bipartisan manner for us to actually do 
+what's great for our students and what's good for their 
+success. Thank you Madam Chairman I will yield back.
+    Chairwoman Wilson. Thank you. Thank you Doctor. I now 
+recognize myself for the purpose of making my closing 
+statement. I want to again thank our expert witnesses for 
+joining our subcommittee's first hearing of this Congress, and 
+for your testimonies.
+    Our discussion today made clear that the relief funding we 
+provided for higher education over the last year has been 
+critical to helping both institutions and students weather the 
+Coronavirus pandemic. But we were also reminded that both 
+Congress and the Biden administration have much work to do to 
+ensure underserved students are not left behind in our recovery 
+from this pandemic.
+    Securing relief funding alone is a disservice to the 
+students. We must take bold steps to strengthen student 
+protections and expand access to student aid, so that we build 
+back a better higher education system for everyone.
+    This committee has a great responsibility to not only help 
+our higher education system survive this pandemic, but also 
+ensure that all students across this Nation have access, if 
+they want it, to a college degree that leads to a rewarding 
+career. I look forward to working with my colleagues to achieve 
+this ultimate goal.
+    If there is no further business before this committee 
+without objection, the subcommittee stands adjourned. And thank 
+you so much for joining us.
+[GRAPHICS NOT AVAILABLE IN TIFF FORMAT]
+
+    [Whereupon, at 3:51 p.m., the subcommittee was adjourned.]
+
+                                 [all]
+