The publisher apologizes for the error. The correct name is: Andres H. Arias. The correct citation is: Das S, Arias AH, Cheng J-O, Souissi S, Hwang J-S, Ko F-C (2020) Occurrence and distribution of anthropogenic persistent organic pollutants in coastal sediments and mud shrimps from the wetland of central Taiwan. PLoS ONE 15(1): e0227367.


The correct name is: Ryan Holliday. The correct citation is: Simonetti JA, Dorsey Holliman B, Holliday R, Brenner LA, Monteith LL (2020) Firearm-related experiences and perceptions among United States male veterans: A qualitative interview study. PLoS ONE 15(3): e0230135.


Saude Publica [online]. 2019, vol.53:107, ISSN 1518-8787, http://dx.doi.org/10.11606/s1518-8787.2019053001184, the RSP corrects the publication type and the How to cite:In the article: Where you read:RevisãoHow to cite: Chemas-Velez MM, Gomez LF, Velasquez A, Mora PLazas MM, Parra DC. Scoping review of studies on food marketing in Latin America: Summary of existing evidence and research gaps. Rev Saude Publica. 2018;53:107.You should read:ReviewHow to cite: Chemas-Velez MM, Gomez LF, Velasquez A, Mora PLazas MM, Parra DC. Scoping review of studies on food marketing in Latin America: Summary of existing evidence and research gaps. Rev Saude Publica. 2019;53:107.


Greater aortic inflammation and calcification in abdominal aortic aneurysmal disease than atherosclerosis: a prospective matched cohort study. Open Heart 2020;7:e001141. doi: 10.1136/openhrt-2019-001141.Joshi NV, Elkhawad M, Forsythe RO, Author name Jonathan Boyle has been updated to Jonathan R Boyle.


Amphisphaeria species have clypeate ascomata and 1-septate ascospores and a coelomycetous asexual morph. Lepteutypa is different from Amphisphaeria in having eutypoid stromata and more than 1-septate ascospores. These main characters have been used for segregation of Lepteutypa from Amphisphaeria for a long time. However, the above characters are overlapping among Amphisphaeria and Lepteutypa species. Therefore, here we synonymized Lepteutypa under Amphisphaeria based on holomorphic morphology and multigene phylogeny. Further, our cluster analysis reveals the relationship between seven morphological traits among Amphisphaeria/Lepteutypa species and suggests those morphologies are not specific to either genus. Three new species  are introduced based on morphology and LSU-ITS-RPB2-TUB2 phylogenies. Furthermore, the monotypic genus Trochilispora, which had been accepted in Amphisphaeriaceae, is revisited and synonymized under Hymenopleella and placed in Sporocadaceae.Amphisphaeriaceous taxa (fungi) are saprobes on decaying wood in terrestrial, mangrove, and freshwater habitats. The generic boundaries of the family have traditionally been based on morphology, and the delimitation of genera has always been challenging.  Amphisphaeria, the type genus of Amphisphaeriaceae, was introduced by Cesati and De Notaris = Lepteutypa fuckelii (G.H. Otth) Petr., Ann. Mycol. 21: 276 (1923)= Tilia cordata , 31 May 2012, P. Bormans ; ex-type living culture CBS 140409.Typus: Belgium, Leuven, Heferlee, Heferleebos, on Lepteutypa fuckelii on Tilia cordata from Belgium (see the generic amendment above).Notes: Jaklitsch et al.  proposedAmphisphaeria gaubae (Petr.) Y. Z. Wang, Aptroot & K.D. Hyde, Fungal Diversity Res. Ser. 13: 13 (2004)MycoBank: MB373366; Facesoffungi number: FoF08748Didymosphaeria gaubae Petr., Sydowia 8: 195. (1954)≡ Lambertia formosa (Proteaceae), 14 July 1950, Gauba .Typus: Australia, Australian Capital District, Jervis Bay, on dead leaves of Didymosphaeria gaubae to Amphisphaeria and Wang et al. ≡ Sphaeria acerina (Rehm) Cooke & Plowr. (1833)= Didymosphaeria acerina Rehm, Ascomyceten: no. 2237 (1874)= Didymosphaeria acerina var. fraxini G. Winter ex Sacc., Syll. fung. (Abellini) 1: 714 (1882)= Massariopsis acerina (Rehm) Kirschst., Annls mycol. 33(3/4): 218 (1935)= Corylus avellana (Betulaceae), in spring, Morthier, Fuckel, Fungi Rhen. Exs. nr. 2661 (holotype?)Typus: Switzerland, Neuchâtel, Ca. Neuchatel, on dry branches of Didymodphaeria species under Amphisphaeria multipunctata. Samuels et al. ≡ Typus: Thailand, Chiang Rai Province, on submerged decaying wood in a freshwater stream, Nov. 2013, K.D. Hyde, ZL-23 ; ex-type living culture MFLUCC 14-0045.Amphisphaeria aquatica (later re-named A. neoaquatica) which is similar to A. uniseptata by having subglobose, black, immersed ascomata and long cylindrical asci. ITS-LSU phylogeny shows that A. neoaquatica is basal to amphisphaeriaceous species , Dimaro, Folgarida, on the branch of Amphisphaeria sorbi with its holomorph and LSU phylogeny from Italy. Amphisphaeria sorbi is highly similar to A. vibratilis but differs in having small perithecia, wide, non-flexuose paraphyses and smooth-walled ascospores without deeply pigmented septa.Notes: Liu et al.  introducAmphisphaeria thailandica Samarak. & K.D. Hyde, Phytotaxa 391 (3): 210–211 (2019)MycoBank: MB555397; Facesoffungi number: FoF04977Typus: Thailand, Phayao, Phu Sang, Doi Phu Nang, on a dead branch, 20 July 2017, M.C. Samarakoon, SAMC097 .Amphisphaeria thailandica is distinguished from other Amphisphaeria species by having subglobose to oval, hyaline bi-guttulate immature and light brown to greyish bi-guttulate ascospores, lacking a mucilaginous sheath.Notes: Amphisphaeria uniseptata  Samarak., Maharachch. & K.D. Hyde, comb. nov.MycoBank: MB836132; Facesoffungi number: FoF08763Clypeosphaeria uniseptata C.K.M. Tsui, K.D. Hyde & Hodgkiss, Mycologia 93(5): 1004 (2001)≡ Lepteutypa uniseptata  Jaklitsch & Voglmayr, Persoonia 37: 88 (2016a)= Typus: Hong Kong, Tai Po, Lam Tsuen River, on submerged wood, Sept. 1997, R.M. Tsui, EjM 247 (HKU(M) 8095, holotype); ex-type living culture HKUCC 6579.Amphisphaeria uniseptata on submerged wood from Hong Kong and noted that it is similar to A. pakistanae in having ellipsoidal, brown, 1-sepatate but differs from having thick-walled ascospores. Jaklitsch et al. ≡ Massariella vibratilis (Fuckel) Sacc., Syll. fung. (Abellini) 1: 716 (1882)= Phorcys vibratilis (Fuckel) J. Schröt., Kryptogamische Flora Schlesiens 3: 381 (1897)= Massariella vibratilis var. mespili Pass., in Brunaud, Ann. Soc. Sci. nat. Char.-Marit. 25: 29 (1888)= Prunus sp. (Rosaceae), June 1915, J. Macoun .Typus: Canada, British Columbia, on the stem of Amphisphaeria vibratilis has asci with the J− apical ring and verrucose ascospores with a mucilaginous sheath.Notes: Wang et al.  re-examiAmphisphaeria yunnanensis Dissan., J.C. Kang & K.D. Hyde, in Dissanayake et al. Phytotaxa 446 (3): 144–158 (2020)MycoBank: MB556876; Facesoffungi number: FoF06505Typus: China, Yunnan Province, Qujing, on a dead branch of an unknown host, 06 May 2019, L.S. Dissanayake, DW1137-048 ; ex-type living culture KUMCC 19-0188.Amphisphaeria yunnanensis has ascomata with narrow and long ostioles, asci with the J– apical ring and ascospores without a gelatinous sheath.Notes: Lepteutypa lack molecular data and asexual morphs. There are some “Lepteutypa” species that have been considered with pestaloid-like asexual morphs as mentioned in the relevant notes below and it is not possible to place them in Amphisphaeria. Therefore, these “lepteutypa-like” taxa need to be recollected, and sexual–asexual connections, molecular data, and generic affiliations established. We therefore do not treat them in Amphisphaeria sensu stricto.Ten species of Lepteutypa alpestris (Ellis & Everh.) M.E. Barr, Mycotaxon 46: 56 (1993)Melanomma alpestre Ellis & Everh., Proc. Acad. nat. Sci. Philad. 46(3): 328 (1894)= Arctostaphylos nevadensis (Ericaceae), July 1886, W.N. Suksdorf, 268 .Typus: USA, Washington, Mt. Paddo, on dead twigs of Lepteutypa alpestris with the sexual morph. However, they noted that one perithecium contained stromatic nature. Barr Keissleriella podocarpi Butin, Sydowia 27(1–6): 273 (1975) [1973–1974]= Podocarpus nubigenus (Podocarpaceae), 29 August 1968, H. Butin (holotype).Typus: Chile, La Unión, leaves of Lepteutypa podocarpi was introduced by Butin [Podocarpus nubigenus in Chile. Based on similar ascospore septation and a pestaloid asexual morph, van der Aa [Lepteutypa.Notes: by Butin  from Podn der Aa  acceptedLepteutypa sabalicola (Ellis & G. Martin) M.E. Barr, Mycotaxon 46: 57 (1993)Sphaeria sabalicola Ellis & G. Martin, Am. Nat. 16: 810 (1882)= Leptosphaeria sabalicola (Ellis & G. Martin) Sacc., Syll. fung. (Abellini) 2: LVII (1883)= Heptameria sabalicola (Ellis & G. Martin) Cooke, Grevillea 18(no. 86): 32 (1889)= Serenoa serrulata , Feb. 1881, Martin (holotype).Typus: USA, Florida, on petioles of Serenoa serrulata from Florida. Ascomata are usually gregarious beneath a conspicuous blackened clypeus. Ascospores are verruculose under the narrow hyaline coating. Another collection from Florida on Aralia spinosa is identical in asci and ascospores, but the ascomata form beaks that protrude 330–449 beyond the blackened clypeus.Notes: Barr  re-examiLepteutypa tropicalis Dulym., Sivan., P.F. Cannon & Peerally, in Dulymamode, Cannon & Sivanesan, Mycol. Res. 105(2): 249 (2001)Pandanus rigidifolius (Pandanaceae), 30 April 1996, R. Dulymamode, P52 .Typus: Mauritius, Petrin, on dead basal leaves of Lepteutypa tropicalis on the adaxial surface of dead fallen leaf bases of Pandanus rigidifolius and P. palustris from Mauritius.Notes: Dulymamode et al.  introducLepteutypa ulmicola (Ellis & Everh.) M.E. Barr, Mycotaxon 46: 57 (1993)= Clypeosphaeria ulmicola Ellis & Everh., Proc. Acad. nat. Sci. Philad. 45: 138 (1893)Ulmus sp. (Ulmaceae), April 1892, Dearness, 1776 .Typus: Canada, Ontario, on dead branches of Lepteutypa ulmicola have one median septum and two distosepta with strongly pigmented and irregularly roughened walls.Notes: Ascospores of Hymenopleella Munk, Dansk Bot. Ark. 15(no. 2): 89 (1953)MycoBank: MB2416; Facesoffungi number: FoF08765Dyrithiopsis L. Cai et al., Mycologia 95: 912 (2003)= Neotruncatella Hyang B. Lee & T.T.T. Nguyen, Fungal Diversity 80: 198 (2016)= Trochilispora V.P. Abreu, A.W.C. Rosado & O.L. Pereira, Fungal Diversity: 96, 169 (2019)= Hymenopleella hippophaëicola Jaklitsch & Voglmayr, Persoonia 37: 96 (2016)Type species: MycoBank: MB814829; Facesoffungi number: FoF08766Hippophaë rhamnoides (Elaeagnaceae), 12 August 2012, W. Jaklitsch ; ex-type living culture CBS 140410.Typus: Austria, Niederösterreich, Gerasdorf, Marchfeldkanalweg, on twigs of Hymenopleella is a sexual morph genus and sexual-asexual connection was confirmed through phylogeny by Liu et al. [Dyrithiopsis and Neotruncatella under Hymenopleella. Jaklitsch et al. [Hymenopleella hippophaëicola, while Liu et al. [Notes: u et al.  while syh et al.  epitypifu et al.  emended Hymenopleella schefflerae  Samarak., Maharachch. & K.D. Hyde, comb. nov.MycoBank: MB836133; Facesoffungi number: FoF08767Trochilispora schefflerae V.P. Abreu, A.W.C. Rosado & O.L. Pereira, in Hyde et al., Fungal Divers 96: 171–173 (2019)≡ Schefflera morototoni , 30 January 2016, V.P. Abreu & O.L. Pereira ; ex-type living culture COAD 2371.Typus: Brazil, Minas Gerais, Paraopeba, Floresta Nacional de Paraopeba (FLONA-Paraopeba), on leaves of For description, see Hyde et al., Fungal Divers 96: 1–242 (2019)Trochilispora schefflerae (COAD 2371) are most similar to Hymenopleella (= Dyrithiopsis) (Sporocadaceae). The LSU-ITS-RPB2 phylogeny in this study also revealed that T. schefflerae clustered with Hymenopleella austroafricana (CPC 21940) with high statistical support. When the genus was introduced in Amphisphaeriaceae, the phylogeny lacked sufficient taxa selection, i.e., they used taxa in Bartaliniaceae, Discosiaceae, Pestalotiopsidaceae, and Robillardaceae which are now synonymized under Sporocadaceae [Monochaetia, Morinia) and Sordariomycetes genera incertae sedis (Ellurema) [T. schefflerae is closely related to Hymenopleella hippophaeicola (CBS 140410). However, Trochilispora was introduced as a new genus with an uncertain phylogenetic position in Amphisphaeriaceae [Trochilispora schefflerae was introduced based on acervular conidiomata, a 3–5-celled, thickened, brown peridium, small conidiophores, discrete, annellidic conidiogenous cells and fusiform, straight or slightly curved, 3–4-septate conidia with medium brown central cells and hyaline to subhyaline end cells with an apical cell with a tubular, filiform, single, eccentric, unbranched, aseptate appendage and basal cell without a basal appendage. However, the photo plate shows a coelomycetous conidiomata and similar morphology to Hymenopleella  and septate conidia . Conidia of Trochilispora schefflerae have longer apical appendages (2.5–7.5 μm) compared to those of H. austroafricana (1.5–4.5 μm). Moreover, the spores of T. schefflerae lack basal appendages, which may be present in H. austroafricana. Based on morphology and phylogeny, here we treat Trochilispora as a synonym of Hymenopleella and accordingly recombine T. schefflerae in Hymenopleella.Notes: A BLASTn search of ITS and LSU sequences of cadaceae . In addillurema) . The phyllurema)  showed teriaceae . Trochile et al. , Liu et e et al. ). TrochiLepteutypa and related genera is still unclear. Our morpho-molecular study corroborated this fact and revealed that Lepteutypa is an ill-defined genus and cannot be clearly segregated from Amphisphaeria. Barr [Amphisphaeria and Lepteutypa are placed together with brown ascospores  and single or few ascomata beneath the clypeus. According to her concept, taxa with 1-septate, smooth-walled or ornamented ascospore bearing species were placed in Amphisphaeria, while 3-septate ascospores with brown terminal cells, lacking elongate appendages, distoseptate at times, a wall usually ornamented and surrounded by narrow mucilaginous sheath were placed in Lepteutypa. This means that the ascospore septation played a key role in distinguishing the two genera. Jaklitsch et al. [Clypeosphaeria unisepta with L. unisepta addressing the ascospores septation as an insignificant characteristic for generic delimitation. Samuels et al. [Jaklitsch et al.  concludeia. Barr  providedh et al.  combineds et al.  had prevAmphisphaeria and Lepteutypa species differ in eutypoid stromata and septation of ascospores in the protologues. However, we consider that these morphologies are not sufficient to distinguish these genera. Here, we synonymize Lepteutypa under Amphisphaeria.Several other studies also show that intraspecific morphological variations are not sufficient for generic delimitation (e.g., Hirayama and Tanaka ; Jaklits


Scientific Reports 10.1038/s41598-020-59463-9, published online 13 February 2020Correction to: This Article contains errors in Reference 17 which is incorrectly given as:Ravanbakhsh, H., Bao, G., Latifi, N. & Mongeau, L. G. Functionalized carbon nanotube-based composite hydrogels for vocal fold tissue engineering: Biocompatibility, rheology, and swelling, Materials Science and Engineering: C 109861 (2019).The correct reference is listed below as Reference


Primary lateral sclerosis: consensus diagnostic criteria. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2020;91:373–7.Turner MR, Barohn RJ, Corcia P, In this paper, Georg Haase should have been included in the collaborators list.


Article title: An emerging coronavirus causing pneumonia outbreak in Wuhan, China: calling for developing therapeutic and prophylactic strategiesAuthors: Jiang S., Du L., & Shi Z.Journal:Emerging Microbes & InfectionsBibliometrics: Volume 9, Number 1, pages 275–277DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/22221751.2020.1723441When the article was first published online, there were few corrections in Figure 1. This has now been corrected in online.


Note, in Schilling EA, Aseltine RH Jr, Glanovsky JL, James A, Jacobs D. Adolescent alcohol use, suicidal ideation, and suicide attempts. J Adolesc Health. 2009;44: 335–341. pmid:19306791.Additionally, the publication year is incorrectly listed as 2014 for Reference 52 in [Swahn MH, Bossarte RM, Choquet M, Hassler C, Falissard B, Chau N. Early substance use initiation and suicide ideation and attempts among students in France and the United States. Int J Public Health. 2012;57: 95–105.S1 File(DOC)Click here for additional data file.S2 File(XLSX)Click here for additional data file.


The publisher apologizes for the error.The third author’s name is spelled incorrectly. The correct name is: Krishna Bahadur KC. The correct citation is: Hannah L, Roehrdanz PR, KC KB, Fraser EDG, Donatti CI, Saenz L, et al. (2020) The environmental consequences of climate-driven agricultural frontiers. PLoS ONE 15(2): e0228305.


Retraction to: Int J Reprod BioMed (2019) 17: 727-738doi.org/10.18502/ijrm.v17i10.5292This article has been retracted at the request of the IJRM editorial board, based on theresults of an investigation which found serious flaws in the study results.http://journals.ssu.ac.ir/ijrmnew/article-1-1695-en.html.The online version of the original article can be found at Salahshoor MR1, Faramarzi A1,2, Roshankhah Sh1, Jalili C2.1Department of Anatomical Sciences, Medical School, Kermanshah University of MedicalSciences, Kermanshah, Iran.2Fertility and Infertility Research Center, Health Technology Institute, KermanshahUniversity of Medical Sciences, Kermanshah, Iran.Corresponding Author:Cyrus Jalili: Department of Anatomical Sciences, Daneshgah Ave., Taghbostan,Kermanshah, Iran. Postal Code: 6714869914Salahshoor MREmail: reza.salahshoor@yahoo.comFaramarzi AEmail: a.faramarzi90@gmail.comRoshankhah ShEmail: roshankhah@yahoo.comJalili CEmail: cyja2019@gmail.com


Some details about author affiliations should to be updated in the article . We sincBocong Yuan, Zhaoguo Wang and Lily Wu are currently affiliated to the School of Tourism Management, Sun Yat-sen University.Jiannan Li is currently affiliated to the International School of Business & Finance, Sun Yat-sen University.The corrected author list is provided below:1, Jiannan Li 2,*, Zhaoguo Wang 1,* and Lily Wu 1Bocong Yuan 1 School of Tourism Management, Sun Yat-sen University, West Xingang Rd. 135, Guangzhou 510275, China; yuanbc@mail.sysu.edu.cn (B.Y.); wull9@mail2.sysu.edu.cn (L.W.)2 International School of Business & Finance, Sun Yat-sen University, West Xingang Rd. 135, Guangzhou 510275, China. * Correspondence: lijnanna@mail.sysu.edu.cn (J.L.); wzglinyi2007@163.com (Z.W.)


Article title: Chromatin remodelling factor BAF155 protects hepatitis B virusX protein (HBx) from ubiquitin-independent proteasomal degradationAuthors: Chen, H., Zhang, Y., Ye, S., Wu, Q., Lin, Y., Shen, K., Chen, W.,Lin, X., & Lin, X.Journal: Emerging Microbes & InfectionsDOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/22221751.2019.1666661This article was originally published with an error in


The publisher apologizes for the error. The correct citation is: Komaki Y, Debacker C, Djemai B, Ciobanu L, Tsurugizawa T, Le Bihan D (2020) Differential effects of aquaporin-4 channel inhibition on BOLD fMRI and diffusion fMRI responses in mouse visual cortex. PLoS ONE 15(5): e0228759.


Correction to: BMC Geriatr 20, 157 (2020)https://doi.org/10.1186/s12877-020-01567-yFollowing publication of the original article , we haveCurrently authors first and last names are: Linsheng Lv, Yan Lei, Liu Xun and Miaoxiaiven Chen.They should be as follows: Linsheng Lv, Lei Yan, Xun Liu and Miaoxia Chen.The original article  has been