The correct name is: Tanja Schimek-Jasch. The correct citation is as follows: Gkika E, Vach W, Adebahr S, Schimek-Jasch T, Brenner A, Brunner TB, et al. (2017) Is serum level of CC chemokine ligand 18 a biomarker for the prediction of radiation induced lung toxicity (RILT)? PLoS ONE 12(9): e0185350.


The correct name is Ulrika Asenbaum. The correct citation is: Nolz R, Asenbaum U, Furtner J, Woitek R, Unterhumer S, Wibmer A, et al. (2016) Type 2 Endoleaks: The Diagnostic Performance of Non-Specialized Readers on Arterial and Venous Phase Multi-Slice CT Angiography. PLoS ONE 11(3): e0149725. doi:


Pseudomonas aeruginosa Biofilm and Motility. PLoS Genet 12(10): e1006354. doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1006354. In the Author Contributions section, the initials JM should appear as JAM.The third author's name is incorrect. The correct name is: Joana A. Moscoso. The correct citation is: Valentini M, Laventie B-J, Moscoso JA, Jenal U, Filloux A (2016) The Diguanylate Cyclase HsbD Intersects with the HptB Regulatory Cascade to Control


Present: Reference and callout information were presented incorrectly for reference 24.Correct: The proper reference and callout information are listed below.RESULTSCancer stem cells from GBM were isolated as described previously [24]. We were able to collect either core- (c-CSC) or peritumor tissue-derived cancer stem cells (p-CSC) from several primary GBM samples. The two types of CSC form intracranial tumors in immunocompromised mice. Nevertheless, c-CSC showed a higher tumor initiating ability when compared with p-CSC which had a lower tumorigenicity [24].REFERENCES24. Lama G, Mangiola A, Proietti G, Colabianchi A, Angelucci C, D'Alessio A, De Bonis P, Geloso MC, Lauriola L, Binda E, Biamonte F, Giuffrida MG, Vescovi A, Sica G. Progenitor/Stem Cell Markers in Brain Adjacent to Glioblastoma: GD3 Ganglioside and NG2 Proteoglycan Expression. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol. 2016; 75:134-47.53047-53063. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.10132Original article: Oncotarget. 2016; 7:


Genes and Environment. These articles were erroneously published in volume number 39, which is listed with a publication date of 2017. However, these articles were published in final form in the year 2016.An error occurred during the publication of a number of articles in Provided below are the actual publication dates and the correct citation for each affected article. Please note that the citation refers to volume number 39 with the year as 2017.Article: http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41021-016-0048-6Publication date: 22 June 2016Correct citation: Yagi, T. Genes and Environ (2017) 39: 1. doi:10.1186/s41021-016-0048-6Article: http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41021-016-0051-yPublication date: 1 December 2016Correct citation: Suzuki, T. & Kamiya, H. Genes and Environ (2017) 39: 2. doi:10.1186/s41021-016-0051-ySince this error was detected the journal resumed publication in the 2016 volume, volume number 38, for the remainder of that year. In 2017, the journal resumed publication in volume number 39. The publisher apologizes for any confusion caused by this error.


The correct citation is: Samarasekera N, Rodrigues MA, Toh PS, Al-Shahi Salman R (2017) Imaging features of intracerebral hemorrhage with cerebral amyloid angiopathy: Systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS ONE12(7): e0180923.


The correct name is: Raisa I. Krutilina. The correct citation is: Fatima I, El-Ayachi I, Taotao L, Lillo MA, Krutilina RI, Seagroves TN, et al. (2017) The natural compound Jatrophone interferes with Wnt/β-catenin signaling and inhibits proliferation and EMT in human triple-negative breast cancer. PLoS ONE 12(12): e0189864.


The correct name is: M. Nicholas Musselwhite. The correct citation is: Pitts T, Gayagoy AG, Rose MJ, Poliacek I, Condrey JA, Musselwhite MN, et al. (2015) Suppression of Abdominal Motor Activity during Swallowing in Cats and Humans. PLoS ONE 10(5): e0128245.


The correct name is: Theresa S. Betancourt. The correct citation is: Betancourt TS, Smith Fawzi MC, Stevenson A, Kanyanganzi F, Kirk C, Ng L, et al. (2016) Ethics in Community-Based Research with Vulnerable Children: Perspectives from Rwanda. PLoS ONE 11(6): e0157042. doi:


Correction to: npj Breast Cancer (2017); doi:10.1038/s41523-017-0024-8; Published 9 June 2017Jeffrey N. Weitzel was mistakenly omitted from the statement of co-senior authors, which should have read: “Kenneth Offit, Katherine L. Nathanson, Fergus J. Couch and Jeffrey N. Weitzel jointly supervised this work.”


The correct citation is: Chambal LM, Gudo ES, Carimo A, Corte Real R, Mabunda N, Maueia C, et al. (2017) HBV infection in untreated HIV-infected adults in Maputo, Mozambique. PLoS ONE 12(7): e0181836.


Rufus” is misspelled in the article title. The correct title is: Molecular characterization and multi-locus genotypes of Enterocytozoon bieneusi from captive red kangaroos (Macropus Rufus) in Jiangsu province, China. The correct citation is: Zhong Z, Tian Y, Song Y, Deng L, Li J, Ren Z, et al. (2017) Molecular characterization and multi-locus genotypes of Enterocytozoon bieneusi from captive red kangaroos (Macropus Rufus) in Jiangsu province, China. PLoS ONE 12(8): e0183249. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0183249The word “


The correct name is: Hugh J. Freeman. The correct citation is: Fisher A, Bassett K, Goel G, Stanely D, Brookhart MA, Freeman HJ, et al. (2016) Heterogeneity in Comparisons of Discontinuation of Tumor Necrosis Factor Antagonists in Rheumatoid Arthritis—A Meta-Analysis. PLoS ONE 11(12): e0168005. doi:


Scientific Reports7: Article number: 4465610.1038/srep44656; published online: 03172017; updated: 05032017. Opt. Express19, 9147–9156 (2011). This has been corrected in the HTML and PDF versions of this Article.The original version of this Article contained a typographical error in Reference 6, which was incorrectly given as: Yaracs, F., Kang, H. & Onural, L. Circular holographic video display system


The correct citation is: Yamada M, Hashimoto Y, Kumano T, Tsujimura S, Kobayashi M (2017) New function of aldoxime dehydratase: Redox catalysis and the formation of an unexpected product. PLoS ONE 12(4): e0175846.


Scientific Reports6: Article number: 3812310.1038/srep38123; published online: 12012016; updated: 03232017In this Article, an additional affiliation for Dmitri Mogilevtsev has been omitted. The correct affiliations for this author are listed below:Institute of Physics, Belarus National Academy of Sciences, F. Skarina Ave. 68, 220072 Minsk, Belarus.Centro de Ciências Naturais e Humanas, Universidade Federal do ABC, Santo André, SP, 09210-170 Brazil.


AbstractCulicoides (Avaritia Fox) (Diptera: Ceratopogonidae: Culicoides) in China, currently including 57 species, is provided. Their full citations, more detailed locations of the type locality, and distribution of each species by province, and/or state of each species are also provided. Culicoides (Avaritia) fenggangensis Liu & Hou, sp. n. is described and illustrated, based on both male and female specimens from China. The new species is compared with its similar congeners, C. (A.) comparis Liu & Yu, 2005 and C. (A.) dentiformis McDonald & Lu, 1972.A checklist of the subgenus  Culicoides Latreille  are found everywhere in the world and females are the smallest of insect vectors , Schmallenberg virus (SBV), and others (Borkent PageBreak2005), which leads to direct economic costs for agriculture , has 348 species in China. Many of the important vectors are in the subgenus Culicoides (Avaritia Fox). The purpose of this paper is to provide a checklist of this subgenus in China, and describe and illustrate Culicoides (A.) fenggangensis sp. n.Biting midges of the genus  vectors . Some spiculture . In Chiniculture , and thetude 40° . TherefoCeratopogonidae by Culicoides follow those described by The specimens were collected with light traps near households in the mountains of Fenggang County of Guizhou Province. For microscopic observation, specimens were preserved in 100% ethanol and then slide-mounted in Canada balsam following the technique described by Avaritia Fox, 1955Subgenus Avaritia Fox, 1955: 218.Type species. Ceratopogonobsoletus Meigen, 1818.Culicoides (Avaritia) abchazicus Dzhafarov, 1964Culicoidesabchazicus Dzhafarov, 1964: 263; Distribution. China (Liaoning); Georgia.PageBreakCulicoides (Avaritia) actoni Smith, 1929Culicoidesactoni Smith, 1929: 255; Culicoidesokumensis Arnaud, 1956: 119. Type locality: Japan.Culicoidesimperceptus Das Gupta, 1962a: 538. Type locality: India.Distribution. China ; India, Indonesia, Malaysia, Philippines, Vietnam, Japan, Thailand.Culicoides (Avaritia) albifascia Tokunaga, 1937Culicoidesalbifascia Tokunaga, 1937: 319; Distribution. China .Culicoides (Avaritia) bawanglingensis Yu, Wang & Chen, 2012Culicoidesbawanglingensis Yu, Wang & Chen, in Distribution. China (Hainan).Culicoides (Avaritia) brevipalpis Delfinado, 1961Culicoidesbrevipalpis Delfinado, 1961: 654; Distribution. China ; Australia, Indonesia, Malaysia, Japan, Sri Lanka, Thailand, Philippines.Culicoides (Avaritia) brevitarsis Kieffer, 1917Culicoidesbrevitarsis Kieffer, 1917: 187; Culicoidesrobertsi Lee & Reye, 1953: 386. Type locality: Australia.Culicoidesradicitus Delfinado, 1961: 657. Type locality: Philippines.Culicoidessuperfulvus Das Gupta, 1962b: 253. Type locality: India.Distribution. China ; Australia, Philippines, India, Laos, Malaysia.Culicoides (Avaritia) bubalus Delfinado, 1961Culicoidesbubalus Delfinado, 1961: 658; Distribution. China (Taiwan), Philippines.PageBreakCulicoides (Avaritia) chiopterus (Meigen), 1830Ceratopogonchiopterus Meigen, 1830: 263. Type locality: Europe.Ceratopogonamoenus Winnertz, 1852: 35. Type locality: Germany.Monoheleasimilis Goetghebuer, 1927: 203. Type locality: Belgium.Culicoidesdobyi Callot & Kremer, 1969: 610. Type locality: France.Distribution. China ; Germany, France, Belgium, Britain, Russia.Culicoides (Avaritia) clavipalpis Mukerji, 1931Culicoidesclavipalpis Mukerji, 1931: 1052; Culicoidescandidus Sen & Das Gupta, 1959: 620. Type locality: India.Distribution. China ; India, Indonesia, Laos, Malaysia, Philippines, Thailand.Culicoides (Avaritia) comparis Liu & Yu, 2005Culicoidescomparis Liu & Yu, in Distribution. China (Tibet).Culicoides (Avaritia) conaensis Liu & Yu, 1990Culicoidesconaensis Liu & Yu, 1990: 19; Distribution. China (Tibet).Culicoides (Avaritia) dentiformis McDonald & Lu, 1972Culicoidesdentiformis McDonald & Lu, 1972: 403; Distribution. China (Taiwan).Culicoides (Avaritia) elongatus Chu & Liu, 1978Culicoideselongatus Chu & Liu, 1978: 83; Distribution. China .PageBreakCulicoides (Avaritia) fenggangensis Liu & Hou, sp. n.Culicoidesfenggangensis Liu & Hou, sp. n., this paper. Type locality: China: Guizhou, Fenggang.Distribution. China (Guizhou).Culicoides (Avaritia) filicinus Gornostaeva & Gachegova, 1972Culicoidesfilicinus Gornostaeva & Gachegova, 1972: 522; Distribution. China ; Russia.Culicoides (Avaritia) gaponus Yu, 1982Culicoidesgaponus Yu, 1982: 202; Distribution. China (Hainan).Culicoides (Avaritia) holcus Lee, 1980Culicoidesholcus Lee, 1980: 85; Distribution. China (Yunnan).Culicoides (Avaritia) hui Wirth & Hubert, 1961Culicoideshui Wirth & Hubert, 1961: 16; Distribution. China ; Indonesia, Laos, Malaysia.Culicoides (Avaritia) imicola Kieffer, 1913Culicoidesimicola Kieffer, 1913: 11; Culicoidespallidipennis Carter, Ingram & Macfie, 1920: 265. Type locality: Ghana.Culicoidesiraqensis Khalaf, 1957: 343. Type locality: Iraq.Culicoidesminutus Sen & Das Gupta, 1959: 622. Type locality: India.Culicoidespseudoturgidus Das Gupta, 1962a: 537. Type locality: India.Distribution. China (Hainan); Wide spread in Africa, the Middle and Far East, India, Laos, Sri Lanka, Vietnam.Culicoides (Avaritia) incertus Yu & Zhang, 1988Culicoidesincertus Yu & Zhang, in Yu, 1988: 136; Distribution. China (Tibet).PageBreakCulicoides (Avaritia) innoxius Sen & Das Gupta, 1959Culicoidesinnoxius Sen & Das Gupta, 1959: 626; Distribution. China (Hainan); India, Cambodia, Indonesia, Laos, Malaysia, Sri Lanka, Thailand.Culicoides (Avaritia) insignipennis Macfie, 1937Culicoidesinsignipennis Macfie, 1937b: 469; Distribution. China ; Malaysia, Brunei, Indonesia, Laos, Philippines, Singapore, Thailand.Culicoides (Avaritia) iphthimus Zhou & Lee, 1984Culicoidesiphthimus Zhou & Lee, 1984: 295; Distribution. China (Chongqing).Culicoides (Avaritia) jacobsoni Macfie, 1934Culicoidesjacobsoni Macfie, 1934: 215; Culicoidesbuckleyi Macfie, 1937a: 117. Type locality: Malaysia.Culicoideskitaokai Tokunaga, 1955: 6. Type locality: Japan.Culicoidesunisetiferus Tokunaga, 1959: 236. Type locality: Papua New Guinea.Distribution. China ; Indonesia, Malaysia, Japan, New Guinea, Philippines, Thailand.Culicoides (Avaritia) kepongensis Lee, 1988Culicoideskepongensis Lee, 1988: 69; Distribution. China ; Malaysia, Laos, Thailand.Culicoides (Avaritia) kinabaluensis Wirth & Hubert, 1989Culicoideskinabaluensis Wirth & Hubert, 1989: 211; Distribution. China (Hainan).PageBreakCulicoides (Avaritia) lansangensis Howarth, 1985Culicoideslansangensis Howarth, 1985: 58; Liu et al. 1996: 38; Distribution. China .Culicoides (Avaritia) lengi Yu & Liu, 1990Culicoideslengi Yu & Liu, 1990: 10; Distribution. China (Guangdong).Culicoides (Avaritia) liui Wirth & Hubert, 1961Culicoidesliui Wirth & Hubert, 1961: 20; Distribution. China ; Indonesia, Laos, Malaysia, Philippines, Thailand.Culicoides (Avaritia) longirostris Qu & Wang, 1994Culicoideslongirostris Qu & Wang, 1994: 486; Distribution. China (Tibet).Culicoides (Avaritia) malayae Macfie, 1937Culicoidesmalayae Macfie, 1937b: 471; Distribution. China ; Indonesia, Malaysia, Philippines, Thailand.Culicoides (Avaritia) mamaensis Lee, 1979Culicoidesmamaensis Lee, 1979: 101; Distribution. China .Culicoides (Avaritia) motoensis Lee, 1978Culicoidesmotoensis Lee, 1978: 75; Distribution. China (Tibet).PageBreakCulicoides (Avaritia) nielamensis Liu & Deng, 2000Culicoidesnielamensis Liu & Deng, 2000: 246; Distribution. China (Tibet).Culicoides (Avaritia) nigritus Fei & Lee, 1984Culicoidesnigritus Fei & Lee, 1984: 345; Distribution. China (Inner Mongolia).Culicoides (Avaritia) nujiangensis Liu, 1990Culicoidesnujiangensis Liu, 1990: 59; Distribution. China (Yunnan).Culicoides (Avaritia) obsoletus (Meigen), 1818Ceratopogonobsoletus Meigen, 1818: 76. Type locality: Europe.Ceratopogonvarius Winnertz, 1852: 35. Type locality: Germany.Ceratopogonyezoensis Matsumura, 1911: 60. Type locality: Russia.Culicoidesobscuripes Santos Abreu, 1918: 297. Type locality: Spain.Culicoideslacteinervis Kieffer, 1919a: 47. Type locality: Slovak Republic, Ukraine.Culicoidesrivicola Kieffer, 1921: 56. Type locality: Germany.Culicoidesclavatus Kieffer, 1921: 56. Type locality: Germany.Culicoidesheterocerus Kieffer, 1921: 57. Type locality: Germany.Culicoidespegobius Kieffer, 1922: 235. Type locality: Germany.Culicoideskabyliensis Kieffer, 1922: 505. Type locality: Algeria.Culicoidesconcitus Kieffer, 1922: 71. Type locality: Germany.Culicoidesintermedius Okada, 1941: 22. Type locality: Japan.Culicoidessintrensis Cambournac, 1956: 591. Type locality: Portugal.Culicoidesseimi Shevchenko, 1967: 173. Type locality: Ukraine.Distribution. China ; wide distribution in Palaearctic Region, Britain, Germany, Russia, Canary Islands, Algeria, Japan, Portugal, Slovakia, Ukraine.Culicoides (Avaritia) orestes Wirth & Hubert, 1989Culicoidesorestes Wirth & Hubert, 1989: 222; Distribution. China (Hainan); Malaysia.PageBreakCulicoides (Avaritia) orientalis Macfie, 1932Culicoidesorientalis Macfie, 1932: 490; Culicoidesnayabazari Das Gupta, 1963: 35. Type locality: India.Distribution. China ; Malaysia, India, Indonesia, Philippines, Thailand, Vietnam, the Solomon Islands.Culicoides (Avaritia) palauensis Tokunaga, 1959Culicoidespalauensis Tokunaga, in Tokunaga & Murachi, 1959: 348; Distribution. China ; Oceania.Culicoides (Avaritia) pastus Kitaoka, 1980Culicoidespastus Kitaoka, 1980: 11; Distribution. China ; Japan.Culicoides (Avaritia) pelius Liu & Yu, 1990Culicoidespelius Liu & Yu, 1990: 23; Distribution. China (Tibet).Culicoides (Avaritia) peregrinus Kieffer, 1910Culicoidesperegrinus Kieffer, 1910: 191; Culicoidesjudicandus Bezzi, 1916: 8. Type locality: Philippines.Culicoidesesmoneti Salm, 1917b: 136. Type locality: Indonesia.Culicoidesphilippinensis Kieffer, 1921: 564. Type locality: Philippines.Culicoidesassamensis Smith & Swaminath, 1932: 183. Type locality: India.Culicoidesquadratus Tokunaga, 1951: 108. Type locality: Indonesia.Distribution. China ; India, Philippines, Indonesia.Culicoides (Avaritia) qionghaiensis Yu & Liu, 1990Culicoidesqionghaiensis Yu & Liu, 1990: 4; Distribution. China (Sichuan).PageBreakCulicoides (Avaritia) ruiliensis Lee, 1980Culicoidesruiliensis Lee, 1980: 86; Distribution. China (Yunnan).Culicoides (Avaritia) scoticus Downes & Kettle, 1952Culicoidesscoticus Downes & Kettle, 1952: 65; Distribution. China (Tibet); Great Britain, France.Culicoides (Avaritia) sinanoensis Tokunaga, 1937Culicoidessinanoensis Tokunaga, 1937: 331; Culicoidesobsoletiformis Amosova, 1957: 233. Type locality: Russia.Distribution. China ; Japan, Russia.Culicoides (Avaritia) suiyangensis Hou, Han, Lv & Jiang, 2014Culicoidessuiyangensis Hou, Han, Lv & Jiang, 2014: 98. Type Locality: China: Guizhou, Suiyang.Distribution. China (Guizhou).Culicoides (Avaritia) sumatrae Macfie, 1934Culicoidessumatrae Macfie, 1934: 190; Culicoidesamamiensis Tokunaga, 1937: 325. Type locality: Japan.Culicoideskagiensis Tokunaga, 1937: 327. Type locality: Taiwan.Culicoidesohmorii Takahashi, 1958: 113. Type locality: Japan.Culicoidesassimilis Delfinado, 1961: 660. Type locality: Philippines.Distribution. China ; Malaysia, Japan, Philippines.Culicoides (Avaritia) suzukii Kitaoka, 1973Culicoidessuzukii Kitaoka, 1973: 212; Distribution. China ; Japan.Culicoides (Avaritia) tainanus Kieffer, 1916Culicoidestainanus Kieffer, 1916: 114; PageBreakCeratopogonmaculatus Shiraki, 1913: 294. Type locality: China: Taiwan.Culicoideskii Tokunaga, 1937: 284. Type locality: Japan.Culicoidessigaensis Tokunaga, 1937: 322. Type locality: Japan.Culicoideskyotoensis Tokunaga, 1937: 329. Type locality: Japan.Culicoidessuborientalis Tokunaga, 1951: 106. Type locality: Indonesia.Distribution. China ; Indonesia, Japan, Laos, Malaysia, Philippines, Thailand, Vietnam.Culicoides (Avaritia) tibetensis Chu, 1977Culicoidestibetensis Chu, 1977: 102; Distribution. China .Culicoides (Avaritia) trimaculatus McDonald & Lu, 1972Culicoidestrimaculatus McDonald & Lu, 1972: 415; Distribution. China (Taiwan).Culicoides (Avaritia) wadai Kitaoka, 1980Culicoideswadai Kitaoka, 1980: 14; Distribution. China .Culicoides (Avaritia) wandashanensis Wang & Liu, 1999Culicoideswandashanensis Wang & Liu, 1999: 328; Distribution. China (Heilongjiang).Culicoides (Avaritia) yamii Lien, Lin & Weng, 1998Culicoidesyamii Lien, Lin & Weng, 1998: 57; Distribution. China (Taiwan).Culicoides (Avaritia) yuchihensis Lien, Lin & Weng, 1998Culicoidesyuchihensis Lien, Lin & Weng, 1998: 58; Distribution. China (Taiwan).PageBreakTaxon classificationAnimaliaDipteraCeratopogonidaeLiu & Housp. n.http://zoobank.org/52A53C15-0F18-4040-B83C-B678BD2E9A66Culicoides in China with the following combination of features: the 3rd segment of the palpus is slender, PR 3.11; the apex of 9th tergite has lateral processes; parameres with apical portion elongate, bent abruptly; aedeagus nearly triangular, with a long ovoid process at its apex. Female: only species of Culicoides in China with the following combination of features: cell m2 with four sparsely distributed pale spots; the 3rd segment of the palpus is slender, PR 3.20–3.75.Male: only species of Female.Head  mm, width 0.68–0.73  mm; CR 0.55–0.59 . TR and F-T of legs ; PR 3.11 (n = 1). Wing with pattern of pale spots as in PageBreakFig. TR and F-T of legs are given as Table th tergite squarish, distal portion flat with short, conical processes at apicolateral. Ninth sternite with broad, deep, semicircle caudomedian excavation. Gonocoxite twice as long as broad, sclerotized; gonostylus tapering distally, distal portion curved. Parameres , 12. IV. 2016, alt. 908m, Qiongqiong Chang col. Paratypes: 2 males and 3 females, same data as holotype.China (Guizhou Province).This species is named in tribute to Fenggang county, where the specimens were collected.Culicoides (Avaritia) fenggangensis sp. n. is very similar to C. (A.) comparis Liu & Yu, 2005 and C. (A.) dentiformis McDonald & Lu, 1972 based on the interfacetal hairs PageBreakon the eyes and sensilla coeloconica on the flagellomeres. C.fenggangensis sp. n. can be distinguished from these two congeners by the number and distribution of pale spots on the wing  (C.comparis and C.dentiformis). Females of C.fenggangensis sp. n. have a different wing size (wing length 1.33 mm and width 0.63 mm in C.comparis and wing length 1.78 mm and width 0.76 mm in C.dentiformis), distribution of the heavy macrotrichia on the wing , they have a more slender 3rd palpus segment compared to the most species of subgenus Avaritia (only 12 species PR > 3.2), PR 3.2–3.75 (respectively PR 2.27 and 2.5 in C.comparis and C.dentiformis), different size of spermathecae (measuring 45.0 × 40.0 μm in C.comparis and 60.0 × 45.0 μm in C.dentiformis). Because male of C.comparis is unknown, the new species will only compare with C.dentiformis. Males of C.fenggangensis sp. n. have a different shape and structure of genitalia, with two lateral processes on the distal portion of ninth tergite , parameres apical portion tapered and abruptly bent (linear in C.dentiformis), long ovoid process at apex of aedeagus (diamond-shape process in C.dentiformis). Therefore, the distinctive features to separate C.fenggangensis sp. n. from others are cell m1 and m2 with 2 and 4 pale spots respectively.omparis) , elongatC.fenggangensis keys to C.dentiformis in C.dentiformis. The female of C.fenggangensis keys to the couplet with C.dentiformis and C.comparis in 2 which are absent in C.dentiformis and C.comparis.The male of Culicoides (Avaritia) are distributed in most provinces of China, except Qinghai and Ningxia. There are 15 species distributed in the Palaearctic Region, accounting for 26.3% of the total . There are 49 species present in the Oriental Region, accounting for 86.0% of the total . Finally, there are seven species present in both Regions, accounting for 12.3% of the total. This geographical distribution of biting midges in China is consistent with the distribution of other animals (The biogeographical territory of China spans the Palaearctic and Oriental Regions, which results in a rich diversity of biting midge species. The species of the subgenus  animals .PageBreak


After publication of this article  we noticTetranychus urticae. J Insect Physiol. 2015; 78:69–77 http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022191015001018Santamaría S, Gonzalez-Cabrera J, Martinez M, Grbic V, Castanera P, Diaz L, Ortego F. Digestive proteases in bodies and faeces of the two-spotted spider mite,


In the article entitled “SURVIVAL OF NONAGENARIAN PATIENTS WITH HIP FRACTURES: A COHORT STUDY” authored by Alexa Ovidiu; Gheorghevici Teodor Stefan; Popescu Dragos; Veliceasa Bogdan; Alexa Ioana Dana, published in Revista Acta Ortopédica Brasileira (ACTA) vol. 25 nº 4, 2017, page 132, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1413-785220172504167561, by request of the authors.The text reading: Citation: Ovidiu A, Stefan GT, Dragos P, Bogdan V, Dana AI. Survival of nonagenarian patients with hip fractures: a cohort study. Acta Ortop Bras. [online]. 2017;25(4):132-6. Available from URL: http://www.scielo.br/aob. Is replaced with: Citation: Alexa O, Gheorghevici TS, Popescu D, Veliceasa B, Alexa ID. Survival of nonagenarian patients with hip fractures: a cohort study. Acta Ortop Bras. [online]. 2017;25(4):132-6. Available from URL: http://www.scielo.br/aob.


Following publication of the original article , the autOriginally, reference 4 was stated as:Willard-Grace RSA, Parker C, Potter MB. Engaging Patients as Partners in Practice Improvement: A Survey of Community Health Centers. J Clin Outcomes Manag. 2016;23(7):311–9.The correct reference 4 is:Willard-Grace, R., Sharma, A.E., Parker C, Potter, M.B. Engaging patients as partners in practice improvement: A survey of community health centers. JCOM. 2016;23(7):311–9.


Scientific Reports6: Article number: 34834; 10.1038/srep34834 published online: 10072016; updated: 01052017.The Competing Financial Interests statement in this Article should read:“D.T.L. is an officer of Aegis CN, LLC, which supplied the CN-105”.


The correct statement is: Data are available from the figshare repository: 26Sortm14(CAG-tdTomato)Hze/J) .The references are:Zhu Y, Romero MI, Ghosh P, Ye Z, Charnay P, Rushing EJ, Marth JD, Parada LF. Ablation of NF1 function in neurons induces abnormal development of cerebral cortex and reactive gliosis in the brain. Genes Dev. 2001;15:859–76. doi:10.1101/gad.862101.Madisen L; Zwingman TA; Sunkin SM; Oh SW; Zariwala HA; Gu H; Ng LL; Palmiter RD; Hawrylycz MJ; Jones AR; Lein ES; Zeng H. 2010. A robust and high-throughput Cre reporting and characterization system for the whole mouse brain. Nat Neurosci 13(1):133–40. PubMed: 20023653MGI: J:155793.


Volume 105105(4) October, page 325http://dx.doi.org/10.5195/jmla.2017.206.Hawkins BW, Morris M, Nguyen T, Siegel J, Vardell E. Advancing the conversation: next steps for lesbian, gay, bisexual, trans, and queer (LGBTQ) health sciences librarianship. J Med Libr Assoc. 2017 Oct;105(4):316–27. DOI: The first author name in reference #11 is incorrect. The reference should be:https://nnlm.gov/classes/LGBTHealth>.11. Leskovec J, Nguyen T. Improving the health, safety and well-being of LGBT populations [Internet]. Baltimore, MD: National Network of Libraries of Medicine; 2017 [cited 20 Feb 2017]. <


The correct citation is: Jajou R, de Neeling A, van Hunen R, de Vries G, Schimmel H, Mulder A, et al. (2018) Epidemiological links between tuberculosis cases identified twice as efficiently by whole genome sequencing than conventional molecular typing: A population-based study. PLoS ONE 13(4): e0195413.


Scientific Reports6: Article number: 2692410.1038/srep26924; published online: 05272016; updated: 04052017A review of 12 commonly used medicinal herbs. Arch Fam Med. 7, 523–536 (1998)”. The correct reference 5 appears below.The original version of this Article contained an error in the reference list, where reference 5 was incorrectly listed as “O’Hara, M., Kiefer, D., Farrell, K. & Kemper, K. This has now been corrected in the HTML and PDF versions of this Article.Referenceet al. Interaction of Veratrum nigrum with Panax ginseng against obesity: A Sang-ban Relationship. Evid-based Compl Alt. 10, 732126 (2013).Park, J.


AbstractDendrocerusscutellaris Trietsch & Mikó (Hymenoptera: Megaspilidae), is described here from male and female specimens captured in Costa Rica. This species is the only known ceraphronoid wasp with a straight mandibular surface and raised dorsal projections on the scutellum, called the mesoscutellar comb. It is hypothesised that the function of the mesoscutellar comb is to aid the emergence of the adult from the host, especially since the mandibles lack a pointed surface to tear open the pupal case. The authors also provide phenotypic data in a semantic form to facilitate data integration and accessibility across taxa and provide an updated phenotype bank of morphological characters for megaspilid taxonomic treatments. In updating this phenotype bank, the authors continue to make taxonomic data accessible to future systematic efforts focusing on Ceraphronoidea.A new species, Dendrocerusscutellaris (Hymenoptera: Megaspilidae) Trietsch & Mikó, is described from both male and female specimens captured in Costa Rica.A new species,  Ceraphronoidea is a relatively small superfamily of parasitoid wasps with a worldwide distribution , which is used as a model organism to study parasitoid behaviour and ecology  and several species of Saturniidae (Lepidoptera) and observed the spine in use by an emerging Actiasluna . Abdominal spines and frontal protuberances serving as “cocoon-cutters” have also been reported on male Psychidae (Lepidoptera); these structures are absent from females, which do not extricate themselves from the pupal case Eclosion is the adult emergence from the pupal case in holometabolous insects. In most holometabolous insects, the tearing of the pupal case is achieved by the movement of the insect and the increased hemolymph pressure caused by muscle contractions . InsectsHymenoptera, wood-boring families have been observed to have specialised structures for extricating themselves from the pupal chambers inside wood where they develop . Specimens are deposited at the Natural History Museum in London, United Kingdom (NHMUK) and at the Frost Entomological Museum, University Park, PA, USA (PSUC).Point-mounted specimens were borrowed from the Natural History Museum (NHMUK) in London, United Kingdom. Specimen data is provided in Suppl. material Point-mounted and glycerine-dissected specimens were examined using an Olympus SZX16 stereomicroscope with an Olympus SDF PLAPO 1XF objective (115×) and an Olympus SDF PLAPO 2XPFC objective (230× magnification). Blue-Tac  and molding clay  was used to stabilise specimens during imaging and observation. Stacks of bright field images were taken manually on an Olympus CX41 microscope with a Canon EOS 70D camera attached. Images were subsequently aligned and stacked using Zerene Stacker Version 1.04 Build T201706041920. Figures were created in Adobe Photoshop elements Version 3.1.2O2 (Alfa Aesar) for 24 hours, then moved to 5% acetic acid  for 24 hours and subsequently moved to glycerol for dissection and short-term storage. Dissections were performed with #5 forceps  and #2 insect pins (BioQuip). Male genitalia were then mounted between 1.5 mm thick, 24×50 mm cover glasses and imaged using an Olympus FV10i confocal laser scanning microscope. Following the methods of To prepare specimens for male genitalia dissection, metasomata were removed from point-mounted specimens and cleared with 35% Hhttp://purl.oclc.org/NET/mx-database) which was used to render the Diagnosis, Description, Material Examined and Etymology sections. Anatomical terms follow the Hymenoptera Anatomy Ontology , Phenotypic Quality Ontology (PATO), Biospatial Ontology (BSPO), OBO Relation Ontology (RO), Ontology for Biomedical Investigations (OBI) and Information Artifact Ontology (IAO); these ontologies are available at http://www.ontobee.org  2008-87; Record Level: language: en; institutionID: http://biocol.org/urn:lsid:biocol.org:col:34665; institutionCode: NHMUK; collectionCode: Insects; basisOfRecord: PreservedSpecimenType status:Paratype. Occurrence: catalogNumber: NHMUK010812044; recordedBy: D Janzen & I. Gauld; individualCount: 1; sex: female; lifeStage: adult; occurrenceID: http://grbio.org/institution/frost-entomological-museum-penn-state-university/19410856-81ec-4ea2-b003-861d28be9fab; Taxon: scientificName: Dendrocerusscutellaris; kingdom: Animalia; phylum: Arthropoda; class: Insecta; order: Hymenoptera; family: Megaspilidae; genus: Dendrocerus; specificEpithet: scutellaris; taxonRank: species; Location: country: Costa Rica; countryCode: CR; stateProvince: Guanacaste; verbatimLocality: COSTA RICA: Guanacaste Pr.: Santa Rosa N. P.: 300m Bosque San Emilio; verbatimElevation: 300m; Identification: identifiedBy: Carolyn Trietsch; dateIdentified: 2017; Event: eventDate: 1985-10-5/26; verbatimEventDate: 5-26.x.1985; eventRemarks: sample SE.6.C. BMNH(E) 2008-87; Record Level: language: en; institutionID: http://biocol.org/urn:lsid:biocol.org:col:34665; institutionCode: NHMUK; collectionCode: Insects; basisOfRecord: PreservedSpecimenType status:Paratype. Occurrence: catalogNumber: NHMUK010812045; recordedBy: D Janzen & I. Gauld; individualCount: 1; sex: female; lifeStage: adult; occurrenceID: http://grbio.org/institution/frost-entomological-museum-penn-state-university/60cf3fa8-009b-4b7e-a529-fc933f737604; Taxon: scientificName: Dendrocerusscutellaris; kingdom: Animalia; phylum: Arthropoda; class: Insecta; order: Hymenoptera; family: Megaspilidae; genus: Dendrocerus; specificEpithet: scutellaris; taxonRank: species; Location: country: Costa Rica; countryCode: CR; stateProvince: Guanacaste; verbatimLocality: COSTA RICA: Guanacaste Pr.: Santa Rosa N. P.: 300m Bosque San Emilio; verbatimElevation: 300m; Identification: identifiedBy: Carolyn Trietsch; dateIdentified: 2017; Event: eventDate: 1985-07-5/8-3; verbatimEventDate: 13.vii-3.viii.1985; eventRemarks: sample SE.6.C. BMNH(E) 2008-87; Record Level: language: en; institutionID: http://grbio.org/cool/29fv-ztxs; institutionCode: PSUC; collectionCode: Insects; basisOfRecord: PreservedSpecimenType status:Paratype. Occurrence: catalogNumber: NHMUK010812030; recordedBy: D Janzen & I. Gauld; individualCount: 1; sex: male; lifeStage: adult; occurrenceID: http://grbio.org/institution/frost-entomological-museum-penn-state-university/50d80e83-a282-43c7-9514-eb821ee2b64f; Taxon: scientificName: Dendrocerusscutellaris; kingdom: Animalia; phylum: Arthropoda; class: Insecta; order: Hymenoptera; family: Megaspilidae; genus: Dendrocerus; specificEpithet: scutellaris; taxonRank: species; Location: country: Costa Rica; countryCode: CR; stateProvince: Guanacaste; verbatimLocality: COSTA RICA: Guanacaste Pr.: Santa Rosa N. P.: 300m Bosque San Emilio; verbatimElevation: 300m; Identification: identifiedBy: Carolyn Trietsch; dateIdentified: 2017; Event: eventDate: 1985-07-5/8-3; verbatimEventDate: 13.vii-3.viii.1985; eventRemarks: sample SE.6.C. BMNH(E) 2008-87; Record Level: language: en; institutionID: http://biocol.org/urn:lsid:biocol.org:col:34665; institutionCode: NHMUK; collectionCode: Insects; basisOfRecord: PreservedSpecimenBody length universal: 2.6-2.7 mm.Colouration: Colour hue pattern: head and mesosoma black; metasoma, mouthparts, legs and scape except for the basal part dark brown; base of scape light brown. Colour intensity pattern: proximal part of scape lighter than the rest of the scape.Head: Cephalic size (csb): mean: 750-1100 μm. Head height  vs. eye height (anterior view): HH:EHf=1.25-1.75. Head height vs. head length: HH:HL=1.2-1.5. Head width vs. interorbital space: HW:IOS=1.6-1.9. Head width vs. head height: HW:HH=1.5-2.0. Male ocular ocellar line vs. lateral ocellar line: OOL:LOL=2.1-2.6. Male ocular ocellar line vs. posterior ocellar line: OOL:POL=0.95-1.0. Female ocular ocellar line vs. lateral ocellar line: OOL 1.6–2.5 x as long as LOL. Anterior ocellar fovea shape: fovea not extended ventrally into facial sulcus. Occipital carina sculpture: crenulate. Median flange of occipital carina count: absent. Preoccipital carina count: present. Preoccipital lunula count: present. Preoccipital furrow count: present. Preoccipital furrow anterior end: preoccipital furrow ends inside ocellar triangle. Dorsal margin of occipital carina vs. dorsal margin of lateral ocellus in lateral view: occipital carina is ventral to lateral ocellus in lateral view. Transverse scutes on upper face count: absent. Rugose region on upper face count: present. Rugose sculpturing on head and mesosoma count: present. Facial pit count: facial pit present. Intertorular carina count: present. Ventral margin of antennal rim vs. dorsal margin of clypeus: not adjacent. Median region of intertorular area shape: concave. Subtorular carina count: present. Torulo-clypeal carina count: present. Supraclypeal depression count: present. Supraclypeal depression structure: absent medially, represented by two grooves laterally of facial pit. Antennal scrobe count: absent. Mandibular tooth count: 1. Mandibular lancea count: absent. Distal edge of mandible: flat.Antennae: Male flagellomeres shape: branched. Male scape length vs combined length of F1+F2: longer or equal. 6th male flagellomere length vs. width, “sensillar” view: elongate, more than 2x as long as wide. Male flagellomere branches count: 7 branches ; 8 branches . Branch of male flagellomere 5 length compared to flagellomere 6: longer than length of flagellomere 6. Branch of male F5 length vs. length of male F5: longer than length of flagellomere 5. Male F6 length vs. combined length of F7+F8: shorter than length of flagellomere 7+8. Sensillar patch of the male flagellomere pattern: F7-F9. Basal resilin-rich area of male antennal branches count: absent. Female F1 length vs. pedicel length: 1.0-1.2. Female ninth flagellomere length: F9 less than F7+F8.Mesosoma and Metasoma: Ventrolateral invagination of the pronotum count: present. Notaulus posterior end location: adjacent to transscutal articulation. Speculum ventral limit: not extending ventrally of pleural pit line. Mesoscutellar comb count: present. Mesoscutal length vs. anterior mesoscutal width: MscL/AscW=1.2–2.0. Anterior mesoscutal width vs. posterior mesoscutal width: AscW/PscW=0.7-0.9. Median mesoscutal sulcus posterior end: adjacent to transscutal articulation. Axillular carina count: absent. Scutoscutellar sulcus vs. transscutal articulation: adjacent. Mesometapleural sulcus count: present. Metapleural carina count: present. Anteromedian projection of the metanoto-propodeo-metapecto-mesopectal complex count: present. Anteromedian projection of the metanoto-propodeo-metapecto-mesopectal complex shape: Bifurcated.Male Genitalia: Distal margin of male S9 shape: convex. Proximolateral corner of male S9 shape: blunt. Proximodorsal notch of cupula count: absent. Gonostyle/volsella complex proximodorsal margin shape: with deep concavity medially. Submedian conjunctiva on distoventral margin of gonostyle/volsella complex: length (range of fusion of parossiculus/parossiculus complex from gonostipes): more than 4/5. Apical parossiculal seta number: one. Dorsal apodeme of penisvalva count: absent. Distal projection of the penisvalva count: absent. Sensillar plate of the aedeagus shape: distinctly less than half as wide as the male genitalia. Distal projection of the parossiculus count: present. Dorsomedian conjunctiva of the gonostyle-volsella complex count: absent. Cupula length vs. gonostyle-volsella complex length: cupula less than 1/2 the length of gonostyle-volsella complex in lateral view. Parossiculus count (parossiculus and gonostipes fusion): present (not fused with the gonostipes). Distoventral submedian corner of the cupula count: absent. Harpe length: harpe shorter than gonostipes in lateral view.Dendrocerusscutellaris (Figs Dendrocerushalidayi species group (Ceraphronoidea in that the distal edge of mandible is flat and not pointed.ris Figs , 4, 5, 6es group , based oThis species is named for the presence of the mesoscutellar comb, which is unique to this species and is not found in any other known ceraphronoid species.This species is only known from Costa Rica.Dendrocerusscutellaris belongs to the halidayi species-group, which is characterised by the presences of flabellate antennae in males (Dendrocerus species that also possesses a bifurcated anteromedian projection of the metanoto-propodeo-metapecto-mesopectal complex (Fig. D.africanus and D.australicus Dodd 1914, both members of the halidayi species-group Dendrocerusscutellaris.in males . This nelex Fig. . This chD.scutellaris is unique amongst members of the halidayi species-group in that, while other species have up to six fully formed branches on the flagellomeres (Dendrocerusscutellaris has 7 fully formed branches with a variable eighth branch that is more developed in the holotype male specimen than in the paratype male (Fig. Dendrocerus in the past (Dendrocerusscutellaris clearly exhibits intraspecific variation in the number and length of the flagellar branches between both male type specimens. Thus, branch length and presence of apical branches should not be used exclusively to describe Dendrocerus species.llomeres , Dendrocale Fig. . The lenthe past , DendrocDendrocerusscutellaris is distinguished from all other ceraphronoid species by the presence of a straight mandibular surface (Fig. Dendroceruscarpenteri Curtis 1829 are known to parasitise braconid parasitoids inside of aphid mummies (Ceraphronoidea possess a pointed mandibular edge and lack the mesoscutellar comb; the presence of a straight mandibular edge in the only ceraphronoid with a mesoscutellar comb is not likely to be a coincidence.ace Fig.  and the ace Fig. , a ridge mummies . It is hSupplementary material 1Specimen Locality InformationData type: occurencesBrief description: A table listing all of the specimens used in this study and their associated locality and repository information.File: oo_170898.xlsxCarolyn Trietsch, István Mikó, David G. Notton, Andrew R. DeansSupplementary material 2MX Taxonomic Treatment FileData type: n3 FileBrief description: The taxonomic treatment file generated from MX used to write semantic statements.File: oo_170907.n3Carolyn Trietsch, István Mikó, David G. Notton, Andrew R. DeansSupplementary material 3Semantic Statement Phenotype AnnotationsData type: OWL fileBrief description: The file containing all of the semantic statement phenotype annotations.File: oo_170908.owlCarolyn Trietsch, István Mikó, David G. Notton, Andrew R. Deans


The correct citation is: Borsatto T, Sperb-Ludwig F, Lima SE, Carvalho MRS, Fonseca PAS, Camelo Jr JS, et al. (2017) Biotinidase deficiency: Genotype-biochemical phenotype association in Brazilian patients. PLoS ONE 12(5): e0177503.


The correct reference is: Zhao T, Shu S, Guo Q, Zhu Y. Effects of design parameters and puff topography on heating coil temperature and mainstream aerosols in electronic cigarettes. Atmospheric Environment. 2016; 134: 61–69. doi:


The correct name is Mireya B. Salinas. The correct citation is: Vaccaro L, Izquierdo F, Magnet A, Hurtado C, Salinas MB, Gomes TS, et al. (2016) First Case of Legionnaire's Disease Caused by Legionella anisa in Spain and the Limitations on the Diagnosis of Legionella non-pneumophila Infections. PLoS ONE 11(7): e0159726. doi:


PMID: 26436540.There is an error in reference 35. The correct reference is: Niknafs N, Beleva-Guthrie V, Naiman DQ, Karchin R. SubClonal Hierarchy Inference from Somatic Mutations: Automatic Reconstruction of Cancer Evolutionary Trees from Multi-region Next Generation Sequencing. PLoS Comput Biol. 2015;11(10): e1004416. doi:


This article has been corrected: The correct 4th affiliation is given below:4 Department of Dentistry, Chung Shan Medical University Hospital, Taichung, Taiwanhttps://doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.20723Original article: Oncotarget. 2017; 8:80900-80908.


Scientific Reports6: Article number: 3185010.1038/srep31850; published online: 08222016; updated: 09212016This Article contains errors in Reference 19.submitted (2016)”.“Kwak, R., Pham, V. S., Kim, B., Chen, L. & Han, J. Enhanced current utilization by unipolar ion conduction in ion concentration polarization desalination. should read:et al. Enhanced salt removal by unipolar ion conduction in ion concentration polarization desalination. Sci. Rep.6, 25349; doi: 10.1038/srep25349 (2016)”.“Kwak, R.


The second and seventh authors’ names are spelled incorrectly. The correct names are: Jonas Doerner and Julian Luetkens.10.1371/journal.pone.0168852The correct citation is: Ghanem A, Doerner J, Schulze-Hagen L, Müller A, Wilsing M, Sinning J-M, et al. (2017) Subacute Subclinical Brain Infarctions after Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation Negatively Impact Cognitive Function in Long-Term Follow-Up. PLoS ONE 12(1): e0168852. doi:The publisher apologizes for these errors.


The correct reference is: Ross RM, McKay R, Coltheart M, Langdon R (2015) Jumping to conclusions about the beads task? A meta-analysis of delusional ideation and data-gathering. Schizophr Bull 41: 1183–1191. doi:


The correct name is: Jagadesh C. Reddy. The correct citation is: Senthil S, Choudhari NS, Vaddavalli PK, Murthy S, Reddy JC, Garudadri CS (2016) Etiology and Management of Raised Intraocular Pressure following Posterior Chamber Phakic Intraocular Lens Implantation in Myopic Eyes. PLoS ONE 11(11): e0165469. doi:


There is an error in the article title. The publisher apologizes for the error. The correct title is: Temperature Stability of a Dengue Rapid Diagnostic Test under Tropical Climatic Conditions: A Follow Up Study.10.1371/journal.pone.0170359The correct citation is: Sengvilaipaseuth O, Phommasone K, de Lamballerie X, Vongsouvath M, Phonemixay O, Blacksell SD, et al. (2017) Temperature Stability of a Dengue Rapid Diagnostic Test under Tropical Climatic Conditions: A Follow Up Study. PLoS ONE 12(1): e0170359. doi:


Nature Communications7: Article number: 12889; DOI: 10.1038/ncomms12889 (2016); Published: 09192016; Updated: 06132017In this Article, the MRE11 exonuclease mutant H63D is consistently referred to incorrectly as H63N. These errors appear in the Results, Methods, Fig. 3, Fig. 4, Fig. 5, Supplementary Fig. 3, Supplementary Table 2 and Supplementary Methods. The authors sincerely apologize for this mistake.


The correct name is: S. V. Subramanian. The correct citation is: Lu C, Chu A, Li Z, Shen J, Subramanian SV, Hill K (2017) Assessing development assistance for child survival between 2000 and 2014: A multi-sectoral perspective. PLoS ONE 12(7): e0178887.


The correct name is: Leonie R. Grenfell. The correct citation is: Hoile SP, Grenfell LR, Hanson MA, Lillycrop KA, Burdge GC (2015) Fat and Carbohydrate Intake over Three Generations Modify Growth, Metabolism and Cardiovascular Phenotype in Female Mice in an Age-Related Manner. PLoS ONE10(8): e0134664.


This article has been corrected: The correct 2nd affiliation and author name is given below:Haobin Cai2,12 Department of Neurology & Psychology, Shenzhen Traditional Chinese Medicine Hospital, Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Shenzhen 518033, Chinahttps://doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.21515Original article: Oncotarget. 2017; 8:92621-92634.


This article has been corrected: The correct author affiliation is given below:1 Department of Clinical Laboratory, Henan Province Hospital of TCM, Zhengzhou, Henan, China13030-13038. https://doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.14712Original article: Oncotarget. 2017; 8:


Scientific Reports 10.1038/s41598-017-04745-y, published online 06 July 2017Correction to: This Article contains errors in Reference 36 which was incorrectly given as:Ocean Sci. Discuss12, 3043–3097 (2015).Schütte, F., Brandt, P. & Karstensen, J. Occurrence and characteristics of mesoscale eddies in the tropical northeast Atlantic Ocean. The correct reference is listed below as ref.


The correct name is: Jesper Dammeyer. The correct citation is: Kørvel-Hanquist A, Koch A, Niclasen J, Dammeyer J, Lous J, Olsen SF, et al. (2016) Risk Factors of Early Otitis Media in the Danish National Birth Cohort. PLoS ONE 11(11): e0166465. doi:


EditorsA H SparkesInternational Society of Feline Medicine, Veterinary Division of International Cat Care, High Street, Tisbury, Wiltshire SP3 6LD, UKandy@icatcare.orgEmail: M ScherkcatsINK, Vancouver, BC, Canada V5N 4Z4hypurr@sagepub.co.ukhypurr@aol.comEmail: Editorial TeamC Bessant (Executive Editor)M Melling (Managing Editor)A Tansley (Assistant Editor)International Society of Feline Medicine, Veterinary Division of International Cat Care, High Street, Tisbury, Wiltshire SP3 6LD, UKjfms@icatcare.org; jfmsclinicalpractice@icatcare.orgEmail:


The correct name is Martin P. Barr. The correct citation is: Circu M, Cardelli J, Barr MP, O’Byrne K, Mills G, El-Osta H (2017) Modulating lysosomal function through lysosome membrane permeabilization or autophagy suppression restores sensitivity to cisplatin in refractory non-small-cell lung cancer cells. PLoS ONE 12(9): e0184922.


AbstractDiptera, Sarcophagidae) recorded to date from Turkey is presented. Updating the list was necessary due to the numerous recent records. Records are listed according to provinces.A checklist of 153 flesh fly species ( Sarcophagidae were compiled by The first reviews of Turkish PageBreakSubfamilies, genera, and species are arranged in the order of the catalogue of PageBreak; Distributional data of sarcophagids in Turkey were compiled analysing all the available publications (see references below). General species distribution was derived mostly from AD), Adiyaman (ADI), Afyon (AF), Ağrı (AG), Amasya (AM), Ankara (AN), Antalya (ANT), Artvin (AR), Aydın (AY), Batman (BT), Bayburt (BY), Bolu (BO), Burdur (BU), Bursa (BS), Diyabakir (DB), Elazığ (EL), Çanakkale (CA), Denizli (DE), Düzce (DU), Edirne (ED), Erzincan (ER), Erzurum (ERZ), Eskişehir (ES), Gaziantep (GA), Hakkâri (HA), Hatay (HT), Iğdır (IG), Isparta (IP), Istanbul (IS), İzmir (IZ), Karaman (KM), Kars (KAR), Kayseri (KY), Kırıkkale (KI), Konya (KN), Manisa (MN), Mardin (MR), Mersin (ME), Muğla (MG), Nevşehir (NE), Samsun (SA), Şanlıurfa (SN), Tokat (TO), Trabzon (TB), Van (VA).Abbreviations: Provinces are abbreviated as follows: Adana (Macronychia (s. str.) lemariei Jacentkovský, 19411. Distribution in Turkey: , KI  striginervis 2. Distribution in Turkey:  polyodon 3. Distribution in Turkey:  albifrons 4. Distribution in Turkey: ANT  conica 5. Distribution in Turkey:  deserta Rohdendorf, 19356. Distribution in Turkey:  tricuspis 7. Distribution in Turkey: 8. Distribution in Turkey: ANT 9. Distribution in Turkey: 14. Distribution in Turkey: 15. Distribution in Turkey: MG 17. Distribution in Turkey: 18. Distribution in Turkey: MG 19. Distribution in Turkey: 25. Distribution in Turkey: : MG (sea): MG .Distribution: Palaearctic.Phyllotelespictipennis Löw, 184426. Distribution in Turkey: (MG (Löw 1844). Turkey: , 2015: MDistribution: Palaearctic-Oriental.Amobiaoculata 27. Distribution in Turkey: 28. Distribution in Turkey: 29. Distribution in Turkey:  kozlovi 31. Distribution in Turkey: IG  tadzhika 32. Distribution in Turkey:  nasuta 33. Distribution in Turkey:  bifasciata 34. Distribution in Turkey:  claripennis 35. Distribution in Turkey:  manni 36. Distribution in Turkey:  steini 37. Distribution in Turkey: 38. Distribution in Turkey: 39. Distribution in Turkey: MG 40. Distribution in Turkey: 41. Distribution in Turkey: 42. Distribution in Turkey: 43. Distribution in Turkey: 44. Distribution in Turkey: 46. Distribution in Turkey: 48. Distribution in Turkey: 50. Distribution in Turkey: 51. Distribution in Turkey: 52. Distribution in Turkey: 53. Distribution in Turkey: SN 54. Distribution in Turkey: SN 55. Distribution in Turkey: 58. Distribution in Turkey: laticornis: Distribution in Turkey: 62. Distribution in Turkey: (B.laticornis & B.plumicornis (as 2 different species), 2012, 2013, 2015 – as B.gladiatrix), BY 64. Distribution in Turkey: 65. Distribution in Turkey: 66. Distribution in Turkey: 67. Distribution in Turkey: (B.filipjevi): ANT , AR (BY (ER (ERZ (KAR (015), AR , BY Distribution in Turkey: 69. Distribution in Turkey: AR  erythrura 70. Distribution in Turkey:  rossica 71. Distribution in Turkey: ERZ  rybaltschenkoi 72. Blaesoxiphaataturkia Lehrer, 2008a: 25.Distribution in Turkey: 73. Distribution in Turkey: ERZ 74. Distribution in Turkey: 75. Distribution in Turkey:  bellae 76. .Distribution in Turkey:  crassimargo 77. Distribution in Turkey:  novella 78. Distribution in Turkey: MG  noverca 79. Distribution in Turkey: ES  novercoides 80. Distribution in Turkey:  dreyfusi 81. .Distribution in Turkey:  macrura 82. Distribution in Turkey: AY  maculata 83. Distribution in Turkey:  melanura 84. Distribution in Turkey:  pachyura 85. Distribution in Turkey: : BY (ER (ERZ (IG (KAR (014): BY , ER  destructor 86. Distribution in Turkey: 87. Distribution in Turkey: BY 88. Distribution in Turkey:  helenae 89. Distribution in Turkey:  mutila 90. Distribution in Turkey:  setinervis 91. Distribution in Turkey:  minima 92. Distribution in Turkey: . Turkey: , 2012: Aey:  siciliensis 93. Distribution in Turkey:  thirionae 94. Distribution in Turkey:  anatolica 95. Distribution in Turkey:  armeniaca 96. Distribution in Turkey:  benaci 97. Distribution in Turkey: (Sarcophagabezziana): KY , KN .Distribution: West Palaearctic.Heteronychia (s. str.) bulgarica 98. Distribution in Turkey: AR  clarahenae Lehrer, 199999. Distribution in Turkey: BY  consanguinea 100. Distribution in Turkey:  haemorrhoa 101. Distribution in Turkey:  haemorrhoides 102. Heteronychiawahisi Lehrer, 1976b: 264.Distribution in Turkey:  infantilis 103. Distribution in Turkey: .Distribution: West Palaearctic.Heteronychia (s. str.) infixa 104. Distribution in Turkey: SA  kerteszi 105. Distribution in Turkey:  lacrymans 106. Distribution in Turkey: (AF (Sarcophaga (Heteronychia) zhelochovtzevi; Sarcophaga (Heteronychia) zhelochovtzevi, 2013, 2015; AR  pontica 107. Distribution in Turkey: SA (rkey: SA .Distribution: East Mediterranean.Heteronychia (s. str.) porrecta 108. Distribution in Turkey: SA  recta 109. Distribution in Turkey: BY  rondaniana 110. Distribution in Turkey:  schineri 111. Distribution in Turkey:  vagans 112. Distribution in Turkey:  boettcheri 113. Distribution in Turkey: (Sarcophaga (Heteronychia) taurica; Sarcophaga (Heteronychia) taurica, 2012): AM (ANT (AR (AY (BO (Heteronychia (Pandelleola) gaspari), DU (ER (ERZ (IG (ME (MG (SA (TO (012): AM , ANT , DU , ER  filia 114. Distribution in Turkey: (AM (ANT (AR (AY (BY (ER (PageBreak2011), ERZ , ERZ , ES  turana 115. Distribution in Turkey: 116. Distribution in Turkey: SA 117. Distribution in Turkey: SA 118. Distribution in Turkey:  lunigera 119. Distribution in Turkey: SA  nigriventris 120. Distribution in Turkey:  socrus 121. Distribution in Turkey: MG  soror 122. Distribution in Turkey: 123. Distribution in Turkey: 125. Distribution in Turkey: 126. Distribution in Turkey: 127. Distribution in Turkey: 128. Distribution in Turkey: (Sarcophaga (Bercaea) africa and Sarcophaga (Bercaea) cruentata)): BT  africa and Sarcophaga (Bercaea) cruentata)), BY , ED , ERZ (ES (Sarcophaga (Bercaea) africa and Sarcophaga (Bercaea) cruentata), KAR (Sarcophaga (Bercaea) africa and Sarcophaga (Bercaea) cruentata), KI , KN , ME (MG (SN (TO (VA (Sarcophaga (Bercaea) africa and Sarcophaga (Bercaea) cruentata; Sarcophagahaemorrhoidalis).ta)), BY , DB (İpelis), ED , EL (Şakis), ERZ , ES (Asllis), ME , MG  surcoufi 129. Distribution in Turkey: SA (rkey: SA .Distribution: Mediterranean.Liopygia (Jantia) crassipalpis 130. Distribution in Turkey:  argyrostoma 131. Distribution in Turkey:  uliginosa 132. Distribution in Turkey: BY  tibialis 133. Distribution in Turkey: AN bartaki Verves, Radchenko & Khrokalo, 2017134. AYDistribution in Turkey:  dux 135. Distribution in Turkey: AN  emdeni 136. Distribution in Turkey:  fedtshenkoi 137. Distribution in Turkey: BY  jacobsoni 138. Distribution in Turkey: ERZ  portschinskyi 139. Distribution in Turkey:  teretirostris 140. Distribution in Turkey: BY  tuberosa 141. Distribution in Turkey: ER  similissimilis 142. Distribution in Turkey:  albiceps 143. Distribution in Turkey:  hirtipes 144. Distribution in Turkey:  caerulescens 145. Distribution in Turkey: ER 146. Distribution in Turkey: 149. Sarcophagaschulzi: Verves 1986: 188.Distribution in Turkey: lasiostyla): AM lasiostyla, 2013, 2015 – as Sarcophaga(s. str.)lasiostyla; HA (IG (Sarcophaga(s. str.)lasiostyla, 2013, 2015 – as Sarcophaga(s. str.)lasiostyla; IZ (Sarcophaga(s. str.)lasiostyla, 2013, 2015 – as Sarcophaga(s. str.)lasiostyla; KAR (Sarcophaga(s. str.)lasiostyla; KY (Sarcophaga(s. str.)lasiostyla, 2013, 2015 – as Sarcophaga(s. str.)lasiostyla; MLA (MN (Sarcophaga(s. str.)lasiostyla, 2013, 2015 – as Sarcophaga(s. str.)lasiostyla), MG (SA (yla): AM , AR , MG , SA 153. Distribution in Turkey: : DB (EL (SN (ria): DB , EL . At least several species of this group were artificially disseminated by humans.Altogether 24 species (ca. 16 %) are broadly distributed, known from at least three basic geographic realms. Out of them, three species are virtually cosmopolitan  are widely distributed also in other zoogeographical regions: Oriental (14 species), Afrotropical (4 species), and Nearctic (2 species).The numbers of shared species between Turkey and other zoogeographical regions is depicted in Fig. Most species occur also in the Oriental (38 species), Afrotropical (15 species), Nearctic (13 species), Australian/Oceanian (9 species) and Neotropical (4 species) regions. Not surprisingly, most species known currently from Turkey are Palaearctic in distribution (43 species) or known from at least the western (30 species) or west – central parts (4 species), representing more than 50% of species. The dominance of Palaearctic elements in the Anatolian fauna has been well established  or only its eastern parts (8 species), while additional species penetrate from teh East Mediterranean to eastern countries of Middle East (4 species) or to the warmest parts of central Europe (2 species classified as submediterranean) or to central Asia (5 species). Altogether these species compose 16.33 % of total.Apodacraradchenkoi, Agriellalindneri, Blaesoxiphacalliste, Heteronychia anatolica, Liosarcophagabartaki, Pandelleanatahtaliana, Sarcophagatrabzonensis - 7 species, 4.58 %).Faunistically significant are species up to now known only from Turkey, classified in the list above as Anatolian (


The correct name is: Emma Terama. The correct citation is: Terama E, Smallman M, Lock SJ, Johnson C, Austwick MZ (2016) Beyond Academia—Interrogating Research Impact in the Research Excellence Framework. PLoS ONE 11(12): e0168533. doi:


The publisher apologizes for the errors. The correct names are: Ji Yun Rho and Hyun Koo Kim. The correct citation is: Choi BH, Young HS, Quan YH, Rho JY, Eo JS, Han KN, et al. (2017) Real-time computed tomography fluoroscopy-guided solitary lung tumor model in a rabbit. PLoS ONE 12(6): e0179220.


The correct name is: Senthil Kandaswamy Vasan. The correct citation is: Fernández Moro C, Fernandez-Woodbridge A, Alistair D'souza M, Zhang Q, Bozoky B, Vasan SK, et al. (2016) Immunohistochemical Typing of Adenocarcinomas of the Pancreatobiliary System Improves Diagnosis and Prognostic Stratification. PLoS ONE 11(11): e0166067. doi:


The correct name is Parastu Kasaie. The correct citation is McKenney J, Chen A, Hoover KW, Kelly J, Dowdy D, Kasaie P, et al. (2017) Optimal costs of HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis for men who have sex with men. PLoS ONE 12(6): e0178170.


The correct name of the first author is Jufen Zheng. The correct name of the fifth author is Leiwen Zhao. The correct citation is: Zheng J, Lu Y, Qu X, Wang P, Zhao L, Gao M, et al. (2016) Decreased Sperm Motility Retarded ICSI Fertilization Rate in Severe Oligozoospermia but Good-Quality Embryo Transfer Had Achieved the Prospective Clinical Outcomes. PLoS ONE 11(9): e0163524. doi:


Artemisia from Kazakhstan by means of HPLC-UV: Method development and validation. PLoS ONE 12(3): e0173714. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0173714. The publisher apologizes for the error.The fourth author’s name appears incorrectly. The correct name is: Aida Sadykova. The correct citation is: Sakipova Z, Wong NSH, Bekezhanova T, Sadykova A, Shukirbekova A, Boylan F (2017) Quantification of santonin in eight species of


AbstractCeraphron  are informative for species delimitation, but due to their minute size, these characters have not been used extensively. Recent developments in visualisation techniques, e.g. confocal laser scanning microscopy and high resolution bright field imaging, allow for more thorough examination of these minute anatomical structures and the development of a robust, male genitalia-based taxonomic system. We also establish a character set, a template, that will facilitate future revisions of these wasps.Male genitalia phenotypes of Ceraphronkrogmanni sp. nov. is described with outsized male genitalia and multiple diagnostic traits that are unique amongst Ceraphron species. Ceraphronidae holds 302 species, classified in 14 genera. More than 90% of the species belong in two genera, Ceraphron (n=185) and Aphanogmus (n=94) (Aphanogmus and wider than high in Ceraphron) is dubious . On the other hand, male Ceraphron specimens are easy to distinguish from Aphanogmus by the morphology of the antenna; the flagellomeres in Ceraphron are cylindrical and covered with sensillum trichodeum curvatum (sickle-shaped sensilla), while, in Aphanogmus, they are trapezoidal in lateral view and equipped with erect and elongate setae The family s (n=94) . Genus-lCeraphronoidea is monotonous relative to other microhymenoptera  are often affected by allometry  and an SDF PL APO 2× PFC Objective (230×). Dissections were performed using #2 insect pins and Rubis 5A-SA forceps. Genitalia were removed and placed on to a separate concave slide in glycerol. Diagnostic measurements were performed on the specimens and genitalia using a KR 851 stage micrometer attached to the examination stereomicroscope.Bright field images were taken with an Olympus ZX41 compound microscope and attached Olympus DP71 digital camera. Genitalia were imaged in glycerol and specimens, including dissected segments, were imaged on Bostik Blu-Tack Reusable Adhesive  to stabilise and position for imaging. Images were aligned using Zerene Stacker Version 1.04 Build T201404082055. Annotation and colour correction was performed in Adobe Photoshop CS4.Genitalia were imaged using an Olympus FV10i Confocal Laser Scanning Microscope (CLSM) following the protocol from http://mx.phenomix.org). The diagnostic characters, description and materials examined were autogenerated by the same content management system. Morphological terms used in the description and diagnosis are derived from phenotype class based ontologies.Specimen data, including figures and character states were imported to MX (All phenotypic descriptions were expressed as semantic statements using Protégé Version 5.0.0 (Build beta 17) using the method provided by The holotype is deposited at the State Museum of Natural History (SMNS) in Stuttgart, Germany and the paratype will be retained at the Pennsylvania State University Frost Entomological Museum (PSUC).urn:lsid:zoobank.org:act:E762860F-DBB7-47AE-A94B-543290842491Type status:Holotype. Occurrence: catalogNumber: PSUC_FEM 86417; recordedBy: L. Krogmann, R. Peters; individualCount: 1; sex: male; lifeStage: adult; preparations: glycerol; occurrenceID: urn:uuid:675a5573-994c-4136-be14-03ab9de2aace; Taxon: scientificName: Ceraphronkrogmanni; kingdom: Animalia; phylum: Arthropoda; class: Insecta; order: Hymenoptera; family: Ceraphronidae; genus: Ceraphron; specificEpithet: krogmanni; taxonRank: species; Location: locationID: 91c31a2d21f8ea1df5681e7f945ec536; continent: Europe; country: Germany; locality: Niedersachen, Lkr. Lüchow-Dannenberg, Pevestorf, Deichvorland & Deich; verbatimCoordinates: N53°03'49", E11°28'27"; decimalLatitude: 53.063611; decimalLongitude: 119.4338; georeferenceProtocol: label; Identification: identifiedBy: Jonah M. Ulmer; dateIdentified: 2016; Event: samplingProtocol: sweeping; eventDate: 08/06/2013; Record Level: language: en; institutionID: SMNS; collectionID: urn:lsid:biocol.org:col:34840; institutionCode: State Museum of Natural History (SMNS); collectionCode: SMNS_Hym_T00665; basisOfRecord: PreservedSpecimenType status:Paratype. Occurrence: catalogNumber: PSUC_FEM 86221; recordedBy: L. Krogmann, R. Peters; individualCount: 1; sex: male; lifeStage: adult; preparations: glycerol; occurrenceID: urn:uuid:675a5573-994c-4136-be14-03ab9de2aace; Taxon: scientificName: Ceraphronkrogmanni; kingdom: Animalia; phylum: Arthropoda; class: Insecta; order: Hymenoptera; family: Ceraphronidae; genus: Ceraphron; specificEpithet: krogmanni; taxonRank: species; Location: locationID: 91c31a2d21f8ea1df5681e7f945ec536; continent: Europe; country: Germany; locality: Niedersachen, Lkr. Lüchow-Dannenberg, Pevestorf, Deichvorland & Deich; verbatimCoordinates: N53°03'49", E11°28'27"; decimalLatitude: 53.063611; decimalLongitude: 119.4338; georeferenceProtocol: label; Identification: identifiedBy: Jonah M. Ulmer; dateIdentified: 2016; Event: samplingProtocol: sweeping; eventDate: 08/06/2013; Record Level: language: en; institutionID: PSUC; collectionID: http://grbio.org/cool/29fv-ztxs; institutionCode: Frost Entomological Museum (PSUC); collectionCode: Insects; basisOfRecord: PreservedSpecimenBody length universal: 0.9—1.1 mm.Colour hue pattern female: NOT CODED. Colour intensity pattern female: NOT CODED. Colour hue pattern male: brownish, legs yellowish, fore wing brown, with a transverse discoloured band at level of stigmal vein. Colour intensity pattern male: flagellum, tibiae and tarsi lighter than scape, pedicel, mandible, tegula, coxae and femora.Foveolate sculpture on body count: present on mesosoma and frons. Head width vs. head height: HW:HH=0.9—1.0. Head width vs. interorbital space (HW/IOS) Female: NOT CODED. Head width vs. interorbital space (HW/IOS) Male: 1.4—1.5. Head width vs. head length lateral view (HW / HL): 1.6. Maximum eye diameter vs. minimum eye diameter: 1.1—1.2. Dorsal carina of occipital depression presence: absent. Dorsal carina of occipital depression medial continuity: NOT CODED. Occipital carina sculpture: smooth Fig. a. Median13Mesosoma shape: not compressed laterally, as wide as high or wider than high Fig. b. Weber 522Median conjunctiva of male T9 count: absent. Row of short setae delimiting apical, cercus-bearing area of male T9: present. Male T10 shape: folded along median weakly sclerotised line. Median part of male S8 structure: not constricted medially, distal margin concave. Anterior margin shape of male S9: concave. Proximal margin part of male S9 shape: concave. Male S9 distal setal line / setal patch count: distal setae composing transverse setiferous line(s). Distomedian, hairless area (interrupting transverse row of setae or patch) on abdominal sternum 9 count: present . Distal margin of male S9 shape: straight. Proximolateral corner of male S9 shape: acute. proximal lobe of vas deferens: NOT CODED. Distodorsal margin of cupula shape: straight Fig. a. Cupula44Flagellar scrobe of the scape count: absent. Male flagellomeres shape: cylindric. 6th male flagellomere length vs. width, "sensillar" view: short, 1—1.4 times as long as wide. Length of setae on male flagellomere vs. male flagellomere width: setae shorter than width of flagellomeres. Male F1 length vs. pedicel length: 2.5—3.0. Male scape length vs. combined length of F1+F2: longer or equal. Whorled rows of erect, elongate setae on male flagellomeres count: absent. Male F6 length vs. combined length of F7+F8: Shorter than length of flagellomere 7+8. Male F1 length vs. male F2 length: 1.2—1.4. Male scape length vs. pedicel length: 4.1—4.3. Number of flagellomeres with male specific ventral sensilla: F5—9. Multiporous plates on male flagellomeres count: present. Male flagellomere branches count: None .Based on the presence of sickle-shaped sensilla on the male flagellomeres and the dorsoventrally compressed mesosoma , the new species belongs to the genus mhb:Fig. c, d, themhb:Fig. a, b and The species epithet is a patronym, honouring Lars Krogmann, Staatliches Museum für Naturkunde Stuttgart, who collected the specimens observed in this study.


An electronic health records cohort study on heart failure following myocardial infarction in England: incidence and predictors. BMJ Open 2018;8:e018331. doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2017-018331.Gho JMIH, Schmidt AF, Pasea L, Johannes M I H Gho and Amand F Schmidt are shared first authors of this paper.


The correct name is: Julia Muellner. The correct citation is: Hartmann A, Muellner J, Meier N, Hesekamp H, van Meerbeeck P, Habert M-O, et al. (2016) Bee Venom for the Treatment of Parkinson Disease – A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial. PLoS ONE 11(7): e0158235. doi:


The correct name is: Mushtaq A. Ansari. The correct citation is: Attia SM, Ahmad SF, Ansari MA, Nadeem A, Al-Shabanah OA, Al-Harbi MM, et al. (2016) Utility of Dexrazoxane for the Attenuation of Epirubicin-Induced Genetic Alterations in Mouse Germ Cells. PLoS ONE 11(9): e0163703. doi:


The correct name is: Olufemi T. Oladapo. The correct citation is: Downe S, Finlayson K, Oladapo OT, Bonet M, Gülmezoglu AM (2018) What matters to women during childbirth: A systematic qualitative review. PLoS ONE 13(4): e0194906.


B. anthracis infection: A need for more robust study designs and results. PLoS ONE12(8): e0182879. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0182879The second author's name is spelled incorrectly. The correct name is: Lernik Ohanjanian. The correct citation is: Xu W, Ohanjanian L, Sun J, Cui X, Suffredini D, Li Y, et al. (2017) A systematic review and meta-analysis of preclinical trials testing anti-toxin therapies for


Permission for use is required. A license agreement is available from: Donald E. Morisky, ScD, ScM, MSPH, Professor, Department of Community Health Sciences, UCLA School of Public Health, 650 Charles E. Young Drive South, Los Angeles, CA 90095-1772.”4)In citation 42, ‘Morisky DE, Green LW, Levine DM. Concurrent and Predictive Validity of a Self-Reported Measure of Medication Adherence and Long-Term Predictive Validity of Blood Pressure Control. Med Care. 196:24:67-74’ should read:A.Morisky DE, Ang A, Krousel-Wood M, Ward H. Predictive Validity of a Medication Adherence Measure for Hypertension Control. Journal of Clinical Hypertension 2008; 10(5):348-354.B.Krousel-Wood MA, Islam T, Webber LS, Re RS, Morisky DE, Muntner P. New Medication Adherence Scale Versus Pharmacy Fill Rates in Seniors With Hypertension. Am J Manag Care 2009; 15(1):59-66.C.Morisky DE, DiMatteo MR. Improving the measurement of self-reported medication nonadherence: Final response. J Clin Epidemio 2011; 64:258-263. PMID: 21144706In the title of the article, ‘randomised’ should be spelt ‘randomized’Upon publication, the below errors were noticed in the original version of the article .In the t


The correct citation is: Xu Y, Shoamanesh A, Schulman S, Dowlatshahi D, Al-Shahi Salman R, Moldovan ID, et al. (2018) Oral anticoagulant re-initiation following intracerebral hemorrhage in non-valvular atrial fibrillation: Global survey of the practices of neurologists, neurosurgeons and thrombosis experts. PLoS ONE 13(1): e0191137. An incorrect file was used for The images for Figs


AbstractVoria Robineau-Desvoidy, 1830 (Diptera: Tachinidae: Voriini) from Area de Conservación Guanacaste (ACG) in northwestern Costa Rica. It was reared as part of an ongoing inventory of wild-caught caterpillars spanning a variety of moth and butterfly families (Lepidoptera). Our study provides a concise description of the new species using morphology, life history, molecular data, and photographic documentation. In addition to the new species, we provide a diagnosis of the genus as well as new data relating to host use.We describe a new species in the genus Voria is described: Voriaerasmocoronadoi Fleming & Wood sp. n.The following new species of Voria: Xenoplagia Townsend, 1914 syn. n., Hystricovoria Townsend, 1928 syn. n., Afrovoria Curran, 1938 syn. n., and Anavoria Mesnil, 1953 syn. n., and Itavoria Townsend, 1931 syn. n.The following are proposed by Fleming & Wood as new synonyms of Voriabakeri , comb. n. and Voriasetosa , comb. n.The authors also propose Voriapollyclari , comb. n. based on the morphology of the holotype.The following new combinations are proposed as a result of the new synonymies:  Voriini (Diptera: Tachinidae: Dexiinae) can be characterized by two main traits, namely: the obliquely angled sinusoidal hind crossvein, and the long ribbon-like phallus  reaching posterior margin; phallus elongate and frequently ribbon-like  collected on flowers of Heraclæumspondylium L. (Apiaceae) found growing in a prairie in Gentilly . Vorialatifronswith Tachinaruralis Fallén, 1810 , while also placing the genus PlagiaMeigen, 1838, in synonymy with Voria. To date, five names have been sunk into synonymy with Voriaruralis, increasing its range from Palearctic only to cosmopolitan. Evidence from DNA barcodes suggests the existence of a great deal of molecular variation among the different populations of this species. As a result, we can only reasonably describe V.ruralis as a species complex. DNA barcoding of the holotype is required for a proper definition of V.ruralis, and a more in-depth study is needed to differentiate the individual species. The elucidation of the V.ruralis species complex falls outside the scope of this paper, where we will only be providing information regarding a single new species described from Area de Conservación Guanacaste (ACG), northwestern Costa Rica (http://www.acguanacaste.ac.cr). Like many other genera of Voriini, species of Voria parasitize caterpillars of Lepidoptera, specifically in the families Noctuidae and Uraniidae  gene sequences, and male terminalia, and discuss its host species. As the inventory is continually growing, the information provided in this paper should not be taken as conclusive on the total number of species of Voriapresent in ACG or Costa Rica, from which only V.ruralis had been recorded prior to our study.The new species of n of ACG . Here, wThis paper is part of a larger effort to describe new species reared during the ACG inventory . This sehttp://janzen.bio.upenn.edu/caterpillars/methodology/how/parasitoid_husbandry.htm. Since its inception, this inventory has reared over 750,000 wild-caught ACG caterpillars. Any frequencies of parasitism reported here need to be considered against this background inventory. Comparative details of the parasitism ecology of these flies will be treated separately in later papers, once the overall alpha-taxonomy of ACG caterpillar-attacking tachinids is more complete.All reared tachinid specimens were obtained from host caterpillars collected in ACG . ACG's 1The description of the new species is complemented with a series of color photos, to illustrate some of the morphological characters described. The morphological terminology used follows http://janzen.bio.upenn.edu/caterpillars/database.lasso.All caterpillars reared from the ACG inventory receive a unique voucher code in the format yy–SRNP–xxxxx. Any parasitoid emerging from a caterpillar receives the same voucher code as a record of the rearing event. If and when the parasitoid is later dealt with individually it receives a second voucher code unique to it, in the format DHJPARxxxxxxx. These voucher codes assigned to both the host and its parasitoids may be used to obtain the individual rearing record at www.boldsystems.org)  , and latTachinidae were collected under Costa Rican government research permits issued to DHJ and WH, and exported from Costa Rica to Philadelphia, en route to their final depository in the Canadian National Insect Collection in Ottawa, Canada (CNC). Tachinid identifications for the inventory were done by DHJ and WH in coordination with a) visual inspection by AJF and DMW, b) DNA barcode sequence examination by MAS and DHJ, and c) correlation with host caterpillar identifications by DHJ and WH through the inventory itself. The date of collection is the date of eclosion of the fly, not the date of capture of the caterpillar. This is because the fly eclosion date is much more representative of the time when that fly species is on the wing than is the time of capture of the host caterpillar, and therefore a date that is appropriate for comparison with adult-caught specimens in other museum collections. The collector listed on the label is the parataxonomist who found the caterpillar, rather than the person who retrieved the newly eclosed fly from its rearing container. Holotypes of all tachinid parasitoids collected by the ACG inventory, including that of the species newly described herein, are deposited at CNC.Inventoried CNC – Canadian National Collection of Insects, Arachnids and Nematodes, Ottawa, CanadaETHZ – Erdgenössische Technische Hochschule-Zentrum, Zurich, SwitzerlandIZCAS – Chinese Academy of Sciences, Institute of Zoology, Beijing, ChinaMLPA – Museo de la Plata, Universidad Nacional de La Plata, La Plata, ArgentinaMNHL – Museum d'Histoire Naturelle de la Ville de Lille, Lille, FranceMRSN – Museo Regionale di Scienze Naturali di Torino , Turin, ItalyMZLU – Museum of Zoology, Lund University, Lund, SwedenNHMUK – Natural History Museum, London, United Kingdom [formerly British Museum ]NHRS – Naturhistoriska riksmuseet, Stockholm, SwedenSANC – South African National Collection of Insects, Pretoria, South AfricaSDEI – Senckenberg Deustsches Entomologisches Institut, Müncheberg, GermanySEMK – Snow Entomological Museum, University of Kansas, Lawrence, Kansas, USAUFVB – Museu Regional de Entomologia, Universidade Federal de Viçosa, Viçosa, Minas Gerais, BrazilUSNM – National Museum of Natural History, Washington, D.C., USA Eois Janzen52" or "CaviriareginaDHJ01", where the "species epithet" is either composed of the name of the taxonomist who identified the species and a number or the name of a species-group followed by a code. This prevents confusion with already described species while maintaining traceability of each undescribed species within the ACG project.Names of undescribed host species follow a standardized, interim naming system used for taxonomic units considered as distinct species not yet formally identified or scientifically described but reliably identified by DNA barcodes. The interim names are given in the format "Voria. DNA extracts were obtained using a standard glass fiber protocol  gene)  was examprotocol  from sinprotocol , we amplprotocol  can be cRobineau-Desvoidy, 1830VoriaVorialatifrons Robineau-Desvoidy, 1830 , by monotypy. Robineau-Desvoidy, 1830: 195. Type species: PlagiaTachinaverticalis Meigen, 1824 , by subsequent designation of  Meigen, 1838: 201. Type species: XenoplagiaXenoplagiasetosa Townsend, 1914, by original designation. Syn. n. Townsend, 1914: 13. Type species: HystricovoriaHystricovoriabakeri Townsend, 1928, by original designation. Syn. n. Townsend, 1928: 395. Type species: ItavoriaItavoriaaurescens Townsend, 1931, by original designation. Syn. n. Townsend, 1931: 475. Type species: AfrovoriaAfrovoriamunroi Curran, 1938 , by original designation. Syn. n. Curran, 1938: 5. Type species: AnavoriaVoria Robineau-Desvoidy, 1830). Type species: Voria(Anavoria) indica Mesnil, 1953 , by monotypy. Syn. n. Mesnil, 1953: 170 (as subgenus of VoriaVoria Robineau-Desvoidy Other species included in aurifronsPlagia). Holotype male (SEMK). Type locality: USA, Pennsylvania. Townsend, 1892: 67 (aurescensItavoria). Holotype male (USNM). Type locality: Brazil, São Paulo, Itaquaquecetuba. Comb. n. Townsend, 1931: 475 (bakeriHystricovoria). Holotype male (USNM). Type locality: Philippines, Luzon, Mt. Makiling [as “Mount Maquiling”]. Comb. n. Townsend, 1928: 395 (munroiAfrovoria). Holotype male (SANC). Type locality: South Africa, Mpumalanga, Barberton. Curran, 1938: 6 (indicaVoria(Anavoria)). Holotype female (NHMUK). Type locality: India, Uttarakhand, Dehra Dun. Mesnil, 1953: 170 (capensisVoria): 138. Holotype male . Type locality: South Africa. Villeneuve, 1935 (setosaPlagia) as “setosa Wd. litt. Cap. [Cape of Good Hope]”, nomen nudum. Brauer & Bergenstamm, 1891: 409, 439  (micronychiaVoria). Holotype male (IZCAS). Type locality: China, Yunnan, Zhongdian, 2400m. Chao & Zhou, 1993: 1335 (operosaVoria), nomen dubium. Robineau-Desvoidy, 1863: 827 (parvaPlagia). Syntypes, 2 females . Type locality: Jamaica, “Liguanea Plain, near Kingston”. Johnson, 1919: 436 (rufitoraxPlagia), nomennudum. Pazos, 1914: 1002 (pollyclariCyrtophloeba). Holotype male (UFVB). Type locality: BRASIL, Minas Gerais, Viçosa [20°45′S e 40°51′W]. Comb. n. Rocha-e-Silva, Lopes & Della Lucia, 1999: 85 . Lectotype male (NHRS), by designation of  Fallén, 1810: 265 (ambiguaTachina). Holotype female (NHRS or MZLU). Type locality: Sweden. Fallén, 1810: 275 . Holotype male (MNHN). Type locality: Europe. Meigen, 1824: 299 (latifronsVoria). Syntypes, unspecified number and sex (MNHN). Type locality: France, Gentilly. Robineau-Desvoidy, 1830: 196 (arcuataTachina). Holotype male (MNHL). Type locality: France, Lille. Macquart, 1834: 264 (VoriainterruptaTachinatransversaPlagia). Holotype female (ETHZ). Type locality: Switzerland, Zurich. Macquart, 1848: 96 (spinicostaTachina). Holotype female . Type locality: Austria, Innsbruck. Palm, 1876: 419 . Syntypes, males and females (NHMUK). Type localities: Mexico: Veracruz (Orizaba); Guerrero (Venta del Zopilote); Xucumanatlan; Omilteme and Tabasco (Teapa).mexicanaPlagia). Holotype female (MRSN). Type locality: Mexico. Giglio-Tos, 1893: 5 (brasilianaVoria). Syntypes, males and females (USNM). Type locality: Brazil, São Paulo, Itaquaquecetuba. Townsend, 1929: 380 (edentataVoria). Holotype male (SDEI)  see . Type loayerzaiPlagia). Syntypes, unspecified number and sex (MLPA). Type locality: not given [listed as Argentina according to  Blanchard, 1943: 157 . Holotype male (USNM). Type locality: China, Sichuan, Suifu.saginataEurigaster). Holotype female (NHMUK). Type locality: Mexico. Walker, 1861: 298 . Holotype female (USNM). Type locality: Peru, Cañada de Saman, Rio Chira, Peru. Comb. n. Townsend, 1914: 14  . One record from ACG suggests that Voriaerasmocoronadoisp. n. may also parasitize Uraniidae.ralidae) . One recFleming & Woodsp. n.urn:lsid:zoobank.org:act:08890077-723B-4C2A-B7C5-1A9709DA4ADEType status:Holotype. Occurrence: occurrenceDetails: http://janzen.sas.upenn.edu; catalogNumber: DHJPAR0059183; recordedBy: D.H. Janzen, W. Hallwachs & Keiner Aragon; sex: male; lifeStage: adult; otherCatalogNumbers: ACGBA5600-16, 16-SRNP-45350, BOLD:AAG9377; Taxon: scientificName: Voriaerasmocoronadoi; phylum: Arthropoda; class: Insecta; order: Diptera; family: Tachinidae; genus: Voria; specificEpithet: erasmocoronadoi; scientificNameAuthorship: Fleming & Wood, 2017; Location: continent: Central America; country: Costa Rica; stateProvince: Guanacaste; county: Sector Rincon Rain Forest; locality: Area de Conservacion Guanacaste; verbatimLocality: Casa Keyner; verbatimElevation: 121; verbatimLatitude: 10.95644; verbatimLongitude: -85.2661; verbatimCoordinateSystem: Decimal; decimalLatitude: 10.95644; decimalLongitude: -85.2661; Identification: identifiedBy: AJ Fleming; dateIdentified: 2017; Event: samplingProtocol: Noctuidae, CtenoplusiaoxygrammaReared from the larva of the ; verbatimEventDate: 06-Mar-2016; Record Level: language: en; institutionCode: CNC; collectionCode: Insects; basisOfRecord: Pinned SpecimenType status:Paratype. Occurrence: occurrenceDetails: http://janzen.sas.upenn.edu; catalogNumber: DHJPAR0006953; recordedBy: D.H. Janzen, W. Hallwachs & Gloria Sihezar; individualCount: 1; sex: female; lifeStage: adult; preparations: pinned; otherCatalogNumbers: ASTAV195-06, 06-SRNP-1503, BOLD:AAG9377; Taxon: scientificName: Voriaerasmocoronadoi; phylum: Arthropoda; class: Insecta; order: Diptera; family: Tachinidae; genus: Voria; specificEpithet: erasmocoronadoi; scientificNameAuthorship: Fleming & Wood, 2017; Location: continent: Central America; country: Costa Rica; countryCode: CR; stateProvince: Alajuela; county: Sector San Cristobal; locality: Area de Conservacion Guanacaste; verbatimLocality: Sendero Carmona; verbatimLatitude: 10.8762; verbatimLongitude: -85.3863; verbatimCoordinateSystem: Decimal; decimalLatitude: 10.8762; decimalLongitude: -85.3863; Identification: identifiedBy: AJ Fleming; dateIdentified: 2017; Event: samplingProtocol: Noctuidae, ChrysodeixisincludensReared from the larva of the ; verbatimEventDate: 02-Mar-2006; Record Level: language: en; institutionCode: CNC; collectionCode: Insects; basisOfRecord: Pinned SpecimenType status:Paratype. Occurrence: occurrenceDetails: http://janzen.sas.upenn.edu; catalogNumber: DHJPAR0007086; recordedBy: D.H. Janzen, W. Hallwachs & Petrona Rios; individualID: DHJPAR0007086; sex: male; lifeStage: adult; preparations: pinned; otherCatalogNumbers: ASTAV328-06, 06-SRNP-30286, BOLD:AAG9377; Taxon: scientificName: Voriaerasmocoronadoi; phylum: Arthropoda; class: Insecta; order: Diptera; family: Tachinidae; genus: Voria; specificEpithet: erasmocoronadoi; scientificNameAuthorship: Fleming & Wood, 2017; Location: continent: Central America; country: Costa Rica; stateProvince: Guanacaste; county: Sector Pitilla; locality: Area de Conservacion Guanacaste; verbatimLocality: Pasmompa; verbatimLatitude: 11.0193; verbatimLongitude: -85.41; verbatimCoordinateSystem: Decimal; decimalLatitude: 11.0193; decimalLongitude: -85.41; Identification: identifiedBy: AJ Fleming; dateIdentified: 2017; Event: samplingProtocol: Uraniidae, Erosia biolep03Reared from the larva of the ; verbatimEventDate: 19-Jan-2006; Record Level: language: en; institutionCode: CNC; collectionCode: Insects; basisOfRecord: Pinned SpecimenType status:Paratype. Occurrence: occurrenceDetails: http://janzen.sas.upenn.edu; catalogNumber: DHJPAR0057036; recordedBy: D.H. Janzen, W. Hallwachs & Freddy Quesada; individualID: DHJPAR0057036; sex: female; lifeStage: adult; preparations: pinned; otherCatalogNumbers: ACGBA4946-15, 15-SRNP-30148, BOLD:AAG9377; Taxon: scientificName: Voriaerasmocoronadoi; phylum: Arthropoda; class: Insecta; order: Diptera; family: Tachinidae; genus: Voria; specificEpithet: erasmocoronadoi; scientificNameAuthorship: Fleming & Wood, 2017; Location: continent: Central America; country: Costa Rica; stateProvince: Guanacaste; county: Sector Pitilla; locality: Area de Conservacion Guanacaste; verbatimLocality: Sendero Rotulo; verbatimLatitude: 11.0135; verbatimLongitude: -85.4241; verbatimCoordinateSystem: Decimal; decimalLatitude: 11.0135; decimalLongitude: -85.4241; Identification: identifiedBy: AJ Fleming; dateIdentified: 2017; Event: samplingProtocol: Noctuidae, DiastemamorataReared from the larva of the ; verbatimEventDate: 08-Feb-2015; Record Level: language: en; institutionCode: CNC; collectionCode: Insects; basisOfRecord: Pinned SpecimenMale ; T5 with gray pollinosity over 50% of tergum. Abdomen elongate, ovoid, with mid-dorsal depression of ST1+2 extending posteriorly to hind margin of syntergite; ST1+2 without median marginal setae, laterally with a small tuft of slightly thickened setae; T3 with two median marginal setae, lacking discal setae; T4 and T5 each with a row of 6–7 marginal setae; T4 lacking discal setae, T5 with a complete row of discal setae. Terminalia , 121–1150m.Voriaerasmocoronadoisp. n. has been reared seven times at ACG: six times from caterpillars of three species of Noctuidae, Ctenoplusia oxygramma , Chrysodeixis includens  and DiastemamorataSchaus, 1894, and once from a caterpillar of ErosiabiolepDHJ03 in the family Uraniidae. Sites of collection include cloud forest, rainforest, and dry-rain intergrade forest.Voria are AT-biased (70%), as expected for insect DNA. The sequences displayed no heteroplasmy or stop codons that would suggest the amplification of a pseudogene and we conclude that these barcodes are mtDNA for Voria. There are currently five other species in BOLD provisionally identified as Voriaruralis from localities other than ACG in BOLD, each with their own unique Barcode Index Numbers (BINs); all are likely to be members of the Voriaruralisspecies complex. The sequence variation between V.erasmocoronadoisp. n.(BOLD:AAG9377) and the other VoriaBINS on BOLD ranges from 3 to 11%. Based on our experience with other species complexes of morphologically indistinct insect species groups in ACG, this distance is highly supportive of the status of V.erasmocoronadoisp. n. as a separate species. The DNA barcode region sequences for


Nature Communications8: Article number: 14859; DOI: 10.1038/ncomms148592017); Published: 03222017; Updated: 04252017The affiliation details for R. Zimmermann, R. Zechner and R. Breinbauer are incorrect in this Article. The correct affiliation details for these authors are given below:Institute of Molecular Biosciences, University of Graz, Heinrichstrasse 31, 8010 Graz, Austria.BioTechMed-Graz, Mozartgasse 12, 8010 Graz, Austria.


The correct citation is: Broce I, Karch CM, Wen N, Fan CC, Wang Y, Tan CH, et al. (2018) Immune-related genetic enrichment in frontotemporal dementia: An analysis of genome-wide association studies. PLoS Med 15(1): e1002487.


Escherichia coli O157:H7 super-shedder cattle occur in the lower intestine. PLoS ONE 12(1): e0170050. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0170050The third author’s name is spelled incorrectly. The correct name is: Devin B. Holman. The correct citation is: Zaheer R, Dugat-Bony E, Holman DB, Cousteix E, Xu Y, Munns K, et al. (2017) Changes in bacterial community composition of


The overall age-adjusted suicide rate was 11.0 deaths per 100,000 population in the United States in 2004 and 12.6 in 2013. From 2004 to 2013, the suicide rate increased in all county urbanization categories, with the smallest increase (7%) in large central metropolitan counties and the largest increases in small metropolitan, town/city (micropolitan) and rural counties (approximately 20% in each). For both years, suicide rates were increasingly higher as counties became less urbanized. For 2013, the age-adjusted suicide rate in rural counties was 1.7 times the rate for large central metropolitan counties .Sources: National Vital Statistics System. County-level mortality file. Available at http://wonder.cdc.gov/mortSQL.html. Ingram DD, Franco SJ. 2013 NCHS urban-rural classification scheme for counties. Vital Health Stat 2014;2(166). Available at http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/series/sr_02/sr02_166.pdf.Reported by: Li-Hui Chen, PhD, eyx5@cdc.gov, 301-458-4446; Deborah D. Ingram, PhD.


Helicobacter pylori and Escherichia coli. PLoS ONE 11(8): e0161587. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0161587.The fifth authors name is spelled incorrectly. The correct name is Mario F. Feldman. The correct citation is: Elhenawy W, Davis RM, Fero J, Salama NR, Feldman MF, Ruiz N (2016) The O-Antigen Flippase Wzk Can Substitute for MurJ in Peptidoglycan Synthesis in


Materials instituted an annual award in order to acknowledge outstanding papers in the area of materials science and engineering published in Materials.Materials from all papers published in 2010. The awards are issued to reviews and articles respectively. We are pleased to announce the second “Materials Best Paper Award” for 2014 for which the following five papers were chosen:Nominations were selected by the Section Editor-in-Chiefs of Article Award:st1PrizeAndreas Klein, Christoph Körber, André Wachau, Frank Säuberlich, Yvonne Gassenbauer, Steven P. Harvey, Diana E. Proffit and Thomas O. MasonTransparent Conducting Oxides for Photovoltaics: Manipulation of Fermi Level, Work Function and Energy Band AlignmentMaterials2010, 3(11), 4892-4914; doi:10.3390/ma3114892http://www.mdpi.com/1996-1944/3/11/4892Available online: nd2PrizeAneta Slodczyk and Philippe ColombanProbing the Nanodomain Origin and Phase Transition Mechanisms in (Un)Poled PMN-PT Single Crystals and Textured CeramicsMaterials2010, 3(12), 5007-5028; doi:10.3390/ma3125007http://www.mdpi.com/1996-1944/3/12/5007Available online: rd3PrizeOsama ShekhahLayer-by-Layer Method for the Synthesis and Growth of Surface Mounted Metal-Organic Frameworks (SURMOFs)Materials2010, 3(2), 1302-1315; doi:10.3390/ma3021302http://www.mdpi.com/1996-1944/3/2/1302Available online: Review Award:st1PrizeLutz-Christian Gerhardt and Aldo R. BoccacciniBioactive Glass and Glass-Ceramic Scaffolds for Bone Tissue EngineeringMaterials2010, 3(7), 3867-3910; doi:10.3390/ma3073867http://www.mdpi.com/1996-1944/3/7/3867Available online: nd2PrizeKoen Van den Eeckhout, Philippe F. Smet and Dirk Poelman2+-Doped Compounds: A ReviewPersistent Luminescence in EuMaterials2010, 3(4), 2536-2566; doi:10.3390/ma3042536http://www.mdpi.com/1996-1944/3/4/2536Available online: Materials and the scientific research area. On behalf of the Prize Awarding Committee and the Editorial Board of Materials, we would like to congratulate these five teams for their excellent work. In recognition of their accomplishment, for the article group, Dr. Andreas Klein, Dr. Philippe Colomban and Dr. Osama Shekhah will receive prizes of 600 CHF, 400 CHF and 200 CHF, respectively, and the privilege of publishing an additional paper free of charge in open access format in Materials, after the usual peer-review procedure. For the review group, Dr. Aldo R. Boccaccini and Dr. Koen Van den Eeckhout will receive the privilege of publishing a research article free of charge in Materials following the peer-review process.We believe that these five exceptional papers are valuable contributions to Prize Awarding CommitteeEditor-in-Chief, Section ‘Biomaterials’Prof. Dr. Aldo R. Boccaccinialdo.boccaccini@ww.uni-erlangen.deInstitute of Biomaterials, Department of Materials Science and Engineering, University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, 91058 Erlangen, Germany, E-Mail: Editor-in-Chief, Section ‘Materials for Energy Applications’Prof. Dr. Thomas Lippertthomas.lippert@psi.chMaterials Group, Research Department General Energy, Paul Scherrer Institut, CH-5232 Villigen, Switzerland, E-Mail: Editor-in-Chief, Section ‘Structure Analysis and Characterization’Prof. Dr. Jung Ho Jejhje@postech.ac.krDepartment of Materials Science and Engineering, Pohang University of Science and Technology, San 31 Hyojadong, Pohang, 790-784, Korea, E-Mail: Editor-in-Chief, Section ‘Porous Materials’Prof. Dr. Rafael Luqueq62alsor@uco.esDepartamento de Quimica Organica, Universidad de Cordoba, Campus de Rabanales, Edificio C-3 (Marie Curie-Anexo), Carretera Nacional IV-A, Km. 396, 14014–Cordoba, Spain, E-Mail:


In Vitro. PLoS ONE 11(12): e0167787. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0167787The third author’s name is spelled incorrectly. The correct spelling is: Nina Filipczak. The correct citation is: Mahmud M, Piwoni A, Filipczak N, Janicka M, Gubernator J (2016) Long-Circulating Curcumin-Loaded Liposome Formulations with High Incorporation Efficiency, Stability and Anticancer Activity towards Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma Cell Lines