enron/test.jsonl

{"text": "Here's a summary of our conversation so you have points to follow up with.\n\nGeneral Status of the Database model: \n FIX not represented - need to incorporate into common design and standardize \n- might cause some FIX rework.\n Referential Integrity not entirely enforced  - potential for bad data to \ndevelop. \n Snapshots from Global databases are currently daily - this can be easily \nchanged to be more frequent, but need to consider implementation as \ndecision   on direction of Global as a part of Commodity Logic is made. \n Rate information not developed - need integration with Rate Server or MKM, \npreferably MKM. Need to define how MKM will be used-whether just for index  \nnames or to obtain actual settlement prices or curves as well.\n Application development is not currently occurring on a single version of \nthe database.  Therefore, some issues could arise as each development team   \nmigrates to the standard. This needs to happen relatively quickly.\n\nSpecific Issues:\n GFD_PIPE_METERS_SNP -  Probably need to add FAC_TYPE (WH, ITE, etc) for \npossible use as validation in KX functionality\n GAS_DEAL_LOCATION_DTL -  This table refers to facility number rather than \npipe and meter.  Facility number is an Enronism that no other company \nwill      recognize.  \n Pipe and Meter General -   Should try to avoid using Pipe_Cd as key.  This \nvalue needs to be updateable as pipelines are bought and sold.\n    -   Data for Facilities is heavily dependent upon Enron Global Facilities \nDatabase in current design and functionality-this      needs revisiting as \nthe decision surrounding Global is made \n CP_ADDR_VW  - This table references only internal_cp_id and contact_type_cd \nin conjunction with address_id.  Addresses are specific to      \ninternal_cp_id, product_cd, deal_nature_cd, contact_type_cd, and region_cd.  \nNeed to add deal nature, product, and      region to ensure correct address \nusage since many companies align their business along these determinants \nand      addresses may vary\n COUNTERPARTY - There is a mixture of the usage of Global Counterparty.  Some \nareas indicate a certain amount of independence from      Enron's Global \nCounterparty system, by having a table to capture Commodity Logic information \non a counterparty such      as phone numbers, credit ratings, etc. This would \nposition CL to become independent at a later date.  Yet, Commodity      Logic \nfunctions as a subset of Enron Networks and GCP must make entries to indicate \nthe usage of a customer by Enron      Networks to obtain an SAP id and \nsupport payment processing through to SAP.  So, CL could not become \nindependent      without further functionality or process changes.  So why \nnot put the added data requirements within GCP to start with?   If      \nGlobal moves to Commodity Logic, then this design needs to be revisited for \nsure.  There should probably be some      standardization between \ndependence/independence whether or not CL separates from Enron. \n Common Data  - Status is not included in the views being utilized by the \napplications.  I hope the views have been filtered for active       status \nonly.  Show was going to check on this.\n    - Concept of mapping others' codes to ours for processing, is not \nsupported anywhere in these tables.  Perhaps       that has been handled in \nan isolated manner in the FIX design? This will have to be there for internal \nrelease as well as      external release.  This is critical to the hub \nconcept.\n\nI look forward to sitting in on your meetings surrounding these issues.  Let \nme know if you have further questions."}
{"text": "Why did I just eat the largest fajita papasito's EVER made?   Put a few of \nthose macadamias in interoffice mail, would you?\n\n\n\n\nAlexandra Saler@EES\n12/06/2000 11:49 AM\nTo: Jeffrey A Shankman/HOU/ECT@ECT\ncc:  \nSubject: Re:  \n\nyou are dead...I have already dug into the nuts, and now I think you did it \non purpose so that I lose the bet!  \n\n\nTo: Alexandra Saler/HOU/EES@EES\ncc:  \nSubject: Re:  \n\nI'm picking out the carpet this weekend--so I'll also run out and get a \npicnic basket!  Your desert capabilities are impressive!  (Next time I'll get \na quart of whipped cream instead of a pint so you can have twice as much, and \nI can win our contest)\n\nYou are a lot of fun--I like hanging out with you.\n\n\n\nAlexandra Saler@EES\n12/06/2000 09:26 AM\nTo: Jeffrey A Shankman/HOU/ECT@ECT\ncc:  \nSubject: Re:  \n\nI had a great time too.  next time when the carpet is in, we can have a \nlittle carpet picnic and watch the 8:00!  by the way...I am still full.  Have \nyou ever seen a girl put away so much dessert?  I am actually known for it!  \nMark almost died the first time he saw me eat dessert!!!  I am only coming \nfor dinner again if you promise we can have homemade whipped cream.  I think \nit is one of the only white things that I like to eat.\n\n\nTo: Alexandra Saler/HOU/EES@EES\ncc:  \nSubject: Re:  \n\nYou know, we've done something the last few tuesdays, and it is now my \nfavorite day of the week!  I had a great time."}
{"text": "fyi\n---------------------- Forwarded by Eric Bass/HOU/ECT on 02/10/2000 03:05 PM \n---------------------------\n\n\nKimberly Perkins\n02/10/2000 03:02 PM\nTo: David Oliver/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeffrey C Gossett/HOU/ECT@ECT, William \nKelly/HOU/ECT@ECT, Eric Bass/HOU/ECT@ECT, William E Kasemervisz/HOU/ECT@ECT, \nRuss Severson/HOU/ECT@ECT\ncc: Scott Mills/HOU/ECT@ECT \nSubject: Lunch Meeting Scheduled for 2/16\n\nPlease plan to attend the following meeting requested by Scott Mills:\n\nTopic: Business Process Changes Regarding Trade Capture \nDate: Wednesday, February 16 \nTime: 11:30 a.m. - 12:30 p.m.\nLocation: Conference Room 2601A\n\nSandwiches will be served.  Please let me know if you have any special \nrequests.  Thank you.\n\nKim Perkins (X3-5304)"}
{"text": "Valerie,\n\nFurther to our conversation,  please see the attached draft of the agreement \ndiscussed.  Upon your review,  please give me a call to discuss any issues or \nquestions you may have.\n\n\n\nRegards,\nDebra Perlingiere\nEnron North America Corp.\nLegal Department\n1400 Smith Street, EB 3885\nHouston, Texas 77002\[email protected]\nPhone 713-853-7658\nFax  713-646-3490"}
{"text": "AE,\n\nWhen you get a minute please send me your favorite option agreement so that I \ncan get it Hermanized.\n\nThanks,\n\nKay"}
{"text": "Whatever happended to all this?  Does Pickering have RisktRAC?\n\nGP\n\n -----Original Message-----\nFrom: \tBeck, Sally  \nSent:\tTuesday, September 04, 2001 11:26 AM\nTo:\tPiper, Greg\nSubject:\tRE: Reconciliation Across Risk Applications\n\nThis will require IT resources that support RisktRAC and source systems (ERMS, Enpower, London applications, etc.).  Jeff Gossett and I have had a kick off meeting with Steve Stock, who nicely enough has all of the necessary resources under his direction, with the exception of the London resources.  Steve is on board to make this happen.  All of this took place while Beth Perlman was on vaction, so I will get with her this week to inform her of the effort and to get her support as well.  \n\nThe project that Wanda refers to came about as a result of my meeting with Rick Buy a few weeks ago.  I suggested, and Rick heartily agreed, that we take ownership of a project to eliminate the disconnect between information in the sources systems (which Rick agreed is accurate) and information in RisktRAC (which is problematic due to the fact that when built, RisktRAC did not focus on how to get information completely, accurately, and efficiently from the source systems).  \n\nWanda is a little ahead of herself with the 60 to 90 day timeline.  We do not have a firm timeline established yet.  We have designated business and IT resources, and are in the process of discussing with London how they will be involved.  Steve Stock is reviewing some diagnostics from his architecture group, and then we will be at the point of delineating milestones and timelines within the next 10 days.  We do anticipate a relatively short timeframe for results on this effort, but that is not yet defined.  \n\nLook for another response to Wanda's memo which I will copy you and Rick Buy on that will give more context to what Wanda wants (which is an excercise to simply document yet again the fact that source system data and RisktRAC don't always match).  --Sally \n\n -----Original Message-----\nFrom: \tPiper, Greg  \nSent:\tTuesday, September  4, 2001 10:08 AM\nTo:\tPickering, Mark\nCc:\tBeck, Sally\nSubject:\tFW: Reconciliation Across Risk Applications\n\nHow is this being staffed technically?\n\nThanks.\n\nGP\n\n -----Original Message-----\nFrom: \tCurry, Wanda  \nSent:\tTuesday, September 04, 2001 10:00 AM\nTo:\tBuy, Rick; Piper, Greg\nCc:\tBeck, Sally; Apollo, Beth; Wilson, Shona; Victorio, Tom; Murphy, Ted; Bradford, William S.; Port, David\nSubject:\tReconciliation Across Risk Applications\n\n\nRick and Greg,\n\nI met with Sally and Beth on August 24th to discuss the operational risk management initiative requiring a reconciliation across all major risk applications.  This reconciliation is necessary to validate the transfer of all data from \nsource systems, i.e. risk books, into risk applications which calculate VAR, provide credit exposures,  feed Infinity with daily cash flows and ultimately the DPR.  \n\nSally and Beth, along with IT, have initiated a project to improve and monitor the accuracy and efficiency of these daily interfaces.  The scope includes a review of the processes which  impact the accuracy of  information, timing of interfaces, production performance issues, inventory of books and improved controls over changes to book attributes, and the officialization process.  They have agreed to add a requirement to provide, on a daily basis, this reconciliation across all major risk applications.\n\nThe projected  timeline to complete this project, including the reconciliation initiative, is 60 to 90 days.  We will need to reassess the decision to combine these initiatives, if the GRMO timeline slips.  \n    \nThis daily risk applications reconciliation will provide four key metrics not currently available:\n\n1) the ability to track data \"accuracy\" in terms of the percentage of information which transferred and processed correctly, vs. just unique \"failures\".  How complete is the data? \n\n2) the ability to validate the accuracy of exception reporting (are all failures included on the exception reports?)\n\n3) the ability to validate Infinity cash flows\n\n4) Reconciliation of values (volumes, PRMA &PRML and cash flows), not # of books processed.\n\nPlease call me if you would like to discuss. \n\nWanda Curry"}
{"text": "I extended the deal at mtr 6719 to include 2/10.   In the future, please run \nall wellhead deals through Tom Acton first.\n\nI've got a message into Julie Meyers to look into the contract at meter 9676, \nand will let you know what she determines.\n\nD\n\n\n\n\nJackie Young\n03/10/2000 10:39 AM\nTo: Daren J Farmer/HOU/ECT@ECT\ncc: Anita Luong/HOU/ECT@ECT \nSubject: 98-6719 and 98-9676\n\nHi Daren,\n\nCan you please check into whether or not the below deals for the above meters \ncan be rolled and extended?  If so, can you please perform this for me so \nthat Anita can set up an accounting arrangement for me?\n\n98-6719  Sitara Deal #166989 Flow @ meter began on February 10th but the deal \nis not effective until  February the 11th.\n     No new deal # referenced and no evergreen flag.  This is on the \ngathering (96026573) K which is the only\n     K @ the meter.\n\n98-9676  Sitara Deal #151669 Deal good from 1/1/00 - 1/31/00 but there is \nflow for all of February 2000 with no K.  This is on the 215K      for 1/2000 \nproduction which is the only K @ the meter.\n\n\nThanks\n-Jackie-\n3-9497"}
{"text": "---------------------- Forwarded by Benjamin Rogers/HOU/ECT on 03/08/2000 \n09:58 AM ---------------------------\n\n\nTeddy Ward\n03/08/2000 07:17 AM\nTo: Benjamin Rogers/HOU/ECT@ECT\ncc:  \nSubject: Enron North America/Rochester Generator Project\n\nBen:  Because of the short time frame I am just forwarding the questions from \nour broker (representing the surety) concerning your request for bid bond.   \nVery valid questions and also will impact your performance bond should you \nwin and need one.  Please try and get back to me asap as this is a very short \ntime frame for the bond.  Thanks.\n---------------------- Forwarded by Teddy Ward/HOU/ECT on 03/08/2000 07:11 AM \n---------------------------\n\n\n\"Phil Bair\" <[email protected]> on 03/08/2000 06:52:45 AM\nTo: Teddy Ward/HOU/ECT@ECT\ncc:  \nSubject: Enron North America/Rochester Generator Project \n\n\n\nTeddy-We are preparing the bid bond based on the request received yesterday \nevening.  The bid specifications indicate liquidated damages in the amount of \n$2,375,000 PER DAY.  I assume Enron will not accept damages at this level.  \nPlease check to determine if the bid will be qualified in this area-and what \nalternative damages may be offered.  Due to the unusual size of the penalty \nrelative to the contract value, this could have an impact on reinsurance.\n\nThe contract indicates a normal one year warrenty from the contractor.  The \ncharge for this warrenty is included in our standard performance bond rate.  \nI have bonded a number of generator contracts similar to this, and frequently \nthere is an option for the contractor to offer an extended warrenty up to 5 \nyears.  Since this would impact the premium charged, you may want to check to \nsee if this option exist so we can get the pricing correct in your estimate.\n\nThanks.\n3/8/00\n\nPhilip N. Bair\n713-346-1378 (Telephone)\n713-520-1260 (Telefax)"}
{"text": "I do not believe that I have seen or had executed the RBC Schedule or Master \nAgreement.  I had prepared the Master Agreement, so if RBC did not do this, I \nhave one ready to go.  However, if RBC has executed the schedule, I will need \nto get a copy and have Peter execute it.  Otherwise, Tana can you e-mail a \nclean execution copy of the schedule to me and I will have Peter execute it \nand send it to Rick to get RBC's execution.  We executed the confirms on \nFriday afternoon and faxed them to Larry Joe Hunter on the Enron North \nAmerica confirm desk.  He will attend to sending them to the counterparties \nfor execution.\n\nGreg Johnston"}
{"text": "Mark,\n\nthe attached fax comprises the forms for:\n\nmyself\nJustin Boyd\nMarcus Von Bock\nJon Chapman.\n\nAs you know, Mary Nell is dealt with in Kristina's PRC.\n\nWe will no doubt speak tomorrow on Jim's call. Talk to you then.\n\n\n\n       Mark\n\n -----Original Message-----\nFrom:  FACSys Fax Connector (EULON-MSCNX03P)  \nSent: 04 June 2001 17:36\nTo: Evans, Mark (Legal)\nSubject: Received fax from 020 7783 8014\n\nSender:   020 7783 8014\nReceived:  04 June 2001 17:30 \nPages:   4 \nServiced By:   FACSys server EULON-APFX1P (Device 23) \nRouting Info:  38287\n\n-------------- Fax Image -------------"}
{"text": "User ID:  enrondlr\nPW:       bnaweb22\n\n\n -----Original Message-----\nFrom: \t\"BNA Highlights\" <[email protected]>@ENRON  \nSent:\tWednesday, October 24, 2001 11:10 PM\nTo:\tBNA Highlights\nSubject:\tOct. 25 -- BNA, Inc. Daily Labor Report\n\n______________________________\n\nDAILY LABOR REPORT\nHighlights & Table of Contents\nOctober 25, 2001\n______________________________\n\nISSN 1522-5968\n\nRegistered Web subscribers can access the full text of these\narticles by using the URL link supplied.\n\nInformation about becoming a subscriber or signing up for a\nFREE Web trial is available at http://web.bna.com or call\nBNA Customer Relations at 1-800-372-1033, Mon. - Fri. 8:30\nam - 7:00 pm (ET).\n__________\n\nHIGHLIGHTS\n__________\n\n\nHOUSE PASSES ECONOMIC STIMULUS;  CRITICS SAY WORKER AID\nFALLS SHORT\n\nBy a vote of 216-214, the House passes a broad economic\nstimulus bill (H.R. 3090) that includes provisions to expand\nunemployment insurance and health care benefits for laid-off\nworkers. Seven Republicans voted against the proposal, while\nthree Democrats voted in favor. Rep. Johnson (R-Conn.) says\nthe bill, sponsored by House Ways and Means Committee\nChairman Thomas (R-Calif.), would put $9 billion into state\ncoffers within 10 days of enactment.\n\n The bill would allow states to use the funds to pay regular\nunemployment benefits, increase benefit payments, extend\nbenefits beyond 26 weeks, expand benefit eligibility, or for\nadministrative purposes. The bill also would extend the work\nopportunity tax credit and the welfare-to-work tax credit\nthrough Dec. 31, 2003, and contains provisions to boost the\nSocial Services Block Grant program by $3 billion so that\nstates can give health coverage to the unemployed.\n\nCritics of the bill--including congressional Democrats,\nlabor, and civil rights groups--claim the measure will not\naccomplish the Republicans' stated goals of stimulating the\neconomy and getting displaced workers back on the job. A\nsubstitute measure offered by House Democrats is rejected by\na vote of 261-166. Senate Majority Leader Daschle (D-S.D.)\ntells reporters that he hopes the Senate will be able to\npass its own version of an economic stimulus bill before\nThanksgiving. . . . Page AA-1\n\nhttp://pubs.bna.com/ip/BNA/dlr.nsf/id/a0a4w6f5c4_\n\n\nARKANSAS COURT ORDERS TRIAL ON WHETHER BIPOLAR DISORDER IS\nPHYSICAL\n\nA former Smith Barney employee is entitled to a trial to\ndecide whether his bipolar affective disorder is a mental\nillness subject to a 24-month cap on benefits under a\nlong-term disability policy or a physical illness not\nsubject to a cap, the Arkansas Supreme Court rules\nunanimously (\"Elam v. First Unum Life Ins. Co., \"Ark., No.\n00-1430, 10/18/01). Reversing summary judgment for First\nUnum Life Insurance Co., the supreme court holds that\nbecause both the insurer and James Elam submitted evidence\noutside of the insurance policy to support their\ninterpretations of the term \"mental illness,\" the issue is a\nquestion of fact for a jury to decide.\n\nThe policy defines mental illness as \"mental, nervous or\nemotional diseases or disorders of any type.\" Arguing the\nterm is ambiguous, Elam says bipolar affective disorder is a\nphysical illness with a biological origin that is treated\nwith medication. . . . Page A-1\n\nhttp://pubs.bna.com/ip/BNA/dlr.nsf/id/a0a4w6a7e7_\n\n\nSIXTH CIRCUIT BLOCKS MOVE TO SEPARATE FLSA, LMRA CLAIMS\n\nA former truck driver's attempt to separate claims he\nbrought under the Fair Labor Standards Act and the\nLabor-Management Relations Act in order to avail himself of\nthe FLSA's two-year statute of limitations falls short, as\nthe Sixth Circuit finds the wage claim barred by the federal\nlabor law's six-month limitations period (\"Martin v. Lake\nCounty Sewer Co., \"6th Cir., No. 00-00228, 10/17/01). In\naddition to seeking unpaid wages under the FLSA after his\ndischarge, Donald Martin charged his former employer, Lake\nCounty Sewer Co., with violating the terms of its collective\nbargaining agreement with a Teamsters local in violation of\nLMRA Section 301. Martin also contended that the union\nviolated its duty of fair representation under Section 301\nby failing to pursue a grievance against Lake for allegedly\nimproper deductions in his benefits and pay.\n\nMartin argues his FLSA claim is distinct from the Section\n301 claim and therefore governed by the wage law's two-year\nlimitations period. According to the Sixth Circuit, however,\nMartin's charge relating to the unpaid wages was based on\nthe provision in the collective bargaining agreement\ngoverning compensation and must be resolved in accordance\nwith LMRA procedures. . . . Page A-8\n\nhttp://pubs.bna.com/ip/BNA/dlr.nsf/id/a0a4w5m1t1_\n\n\nNURSE'S AIDE ASSAULTED BY CO-WORKER CAN PROCEED WITH SUIT\n\nA nurse's assistant who was sexually assaulted by a\nco-worker can proceed with a series of claims against an\nupstate New York health care facility, despite the fact that\nthe employer immediately suspended and later discharged the\nalleged attacker, a federal magistrate judge rules (\"Becker\nv. Ulster County, \"N.D. N.Y., No. 99-CV-1278, 10/10/01).\n\nRejecting a summary judgment motion by Ulster County Golden\nHill Health Care Center, Judge Homer of the U.S. District\nCourt for the Northern District of New York finds that Gail\nBecker established enough evidence to go to trial on her\nclaims of sexual harassment based on a hostile work\nenvironment and retaliation under Title VII of the 1964\nCivil Rights Act and other laws.\n\nHer evidence surrounding the assault incident--including her\nsupervisor's failure to allow Becker to call the police and\nthe facility's refusal to allow her time off to seek a\nprotective order--if credited, \"establishes an incident\nsufficient by itself to support a finding that the\nconditions of her employment were irrevocably altered as a\nresult and that those conditions became abusive,\" the court\nholds. . . . Page A-2\n\nhttp://pubs.bna.com/ip/BNA/dlr.nsf/id/a0a4w5h5w4_\n\n\nFED FINDS MANY REGIONS REBOUNDING FROM SEPTEMBER\n\nThe terrorist attacks on New York and Washington stunted\neconomic growth throughout the country in September, but\nmany regions saw activity rebound in recent weeks, the\nFederal Reserve reports in its \"Beige Book\" summary of\neconomic conditions in each of its 12 districts.\n\nBusiness activity recovered quickly from some aspects of the\nattacks, such as reduced air cargo capacity, but long-run\neffects are more difficult to assess, according to the Fed.\nNew since the attacks, however, are disruptions to\nproductivity due to increased security precautions and\ninsurance premiums, the central bank says. . . . Page D-12\n\nhttp://pubs.bna.com/ip/BNA/dlr.nsf/id/a0a4w6h7v2_\n\n\n______________\n\nTODAY'S EVENTS\n______________\n\nEMPLOYMENT: Bureau of Labor Statistics releases third\nquarter figures on employment cost index, 8:30 a.m., Labor\nDepartment.\n\nUNEMPLOYMENT: Weekly data on initial claims for unemployment\nbenefits released, 8:30 a.m., Labor Department.\n\n________________\n\nALSO IN THE NEWS\n________________\n\n\nEARNINGS: On an inflation-adjusted basis, the median weekly\nearnings of full-time U.S. workers rose 0.8 percent during\nthe year ended in the third quarter, a smaller gain than in\nthe prior 12-month period, according to figures by the\nBureau of Labor Statistics. . . . Page D-6\n\nhttp://pubs.bna.com/ip/BNA/dlr.nsf/id/a0a4w6g5n1_\n\nHOTELS: Closure of the Flamingo Reno hotel and casino\naffects approximately 1,000 workers. As the business shut\ndown, the Hotel Employees and Restaurant Employees union\nstill was pushing the casino's owners to provide extra\nbenefits beyond what the company has offered the workers, a\nunion representative says. . . . Page A-2\n\nhttp://pubs.bna.com/ip/BNA/dlr.nsf/id/a0a4w6a8f6_\n\nSAFETY & HEALTH: Safety professionals and employers at\nnearly 1.3 million worksites will have new forms for\nrecording on-the-job injuries and illnesses, bringing to a\nclose an effort launched during the late 1980s to simplify\nthe recordkeeping burden while providing more detailed\ninformation on how accidents and illnesses occur.  . . .\nPage A-11\n\nhttp://pubs.bna.com/ip/BNA/dlr.nsf/id/a0a4w6f7e1_\n\nHEALTH CARE EMPLOYEES:  Registered nurses, represented by\nUnited Food and Commercial Workers Local 655, at St. John's\nMercy Medical Center in St. Louis approve by a 721-108 vote\na first contract, ending nearly two years of negotiations\nsince formation of the bargaining unit in July 1999. . . .\nPage A-8\n\nhttp://pubs.bna.com/ip/BNA/dlr.nsf/id/a0a4w6b7t2_\n\n\n_________________\n\nTABLE OF CONTENTS\n_________________\n\nLEADING THE NEWS\n\nEMPLOYMENT\n   House passes by vote of 216-214 broad economic stimulus\n   bill (H.R. 3090) that includes provisions to expand\n   unemployment insurance and health care benefits for\n   laid-off workers . . . Page AA-1\n   http://pubs.bna.com/ip/BNA/dlr.nsf/id/a0a4w6f5c4_\n\n\n____\n\nNEWS\n____\n\nARBITRATION\n   Public policy dictates reversing arbitration decision\n   that allowed police officer accused of sexual harassment\n   and improper sexual conduct to return to work, Minnesota\n   appeals court rules . . . Page A-7\n   http://pubs.bna.com/ip/BNA/dlr.nsf/id/a0a4w5g3r3_\n\nEMPLOYEE BENEFITS\n   Former Smith Barney employee is entitled to trial to\n   decide whether his bipolar affective disorder is mental\n   illness subject to 24-month cap on benefits under\n   long-term disability policy or physical illness not\n   subject to cap, Arkansas Supreme Court rules . . . Page\n   A-1\n   http://pubs.bna.com/ip/BNA/dlr.nsf/id/a0a4w6a7e7_\n\nERISA\n   \"Abatement plan\" between UPS Inc. and Teamsters that\n   allowed UPS to temporarily abate its contributions to\n   multiemployer pension fund in exchange for higher\n   contribution rates did not violate ERISA, Seventh Circuit\n   rules . . . Page A-4\n   http://pubs.bna.com/ip/BNA/dlr.nsf/id/a0a4w5x5d6_\n\nFLSA\n   Sixth Circuit finds former truck driver's Fair Labor\n   Standards Act claim barred by Labor-Management Relations\n   Act's six-month limitations period . . . Page A-8\n   http://pubs.bna.com/ip/BNA/dlr.nsf/id/a0a4w5m1t1_\n\nHEALTH CARE EMPLOYEES\n   Registered nurses at St. John's Mercy Medical Center in\n   St. Louis approve first contract, ending nearly two years\n   of negotiations . . . Page A-8\n   http://pubs.bna.com/ip/BNA/dlr.nsf/id/a0a4w6b7t2_\n\nHIRING\n   Eli Lilly and Co. will add 5,000 additional sales\n   representative positions over next three years . . . Page\n   A-13\n   http://pubs.bna.com/ip/BNA/dlr.nsf/id/a0a4w6a5b8_\n\nHOTELS\n   HERE Local 86 presses until last minute for more generous\n   severance benefits for 1,000 employees affected by\n   closing of Flamingo Reno hotel and casino . . . Page A-2\n   http://pubs.bna.com/ip/BNA/dlr.nsf/id/a0a4w6a8f6_\n\nINTERNATIONAL LABOR\n   Legislation updating equal employment rights for men and\n   women across European Union is approved by European\n   Parliament . . . Page A-6\n   http://pubs.bna.com/ip/BNA/dlr.nsf/id/a0a4w6a6x4_\n\nLABOR LAW\n   Local hotel union's failure to mail election ballots to\n   nearly 1,600 members supports setting aside election and\n   holding new vote, federal district court rules . . . Page\n   A-3\n   http://pubs.bna.com/ip/BNA/dlr.nsf/id/a0a4w5k9t9_\n\nLABOR-MANAGEMENT COOPERATION\n   National Labor-Management Conference 2002 Board of\n   Directors seeks proposals for presentations on\n   cooperation and innovation in unionized workplaces . . .\n   Page A-13\n   http://pubs.bna.com/ip/BNA/dlr.nsf/id/a0a4w5z7n4_\n\nPENSIONS\n   Employer may not recover from actuarial consulting firm\n   millions of dollars in pension plan benefits employer\n   claims it lost because actuary failed to provide timely\n   information to employer, Tenth Circuit rules . . . Page\n   A-9\n   http://pubs.bna.com/ip/BNA/dlr.nsf/id/a0a4w6e6w2_\n\nRETIREE BENEFITS\n   Law requiring Social Security Administration to assign\n   retired coal miners' health care premium liability to\n   signatory coal operators did not impose Oct. 1, 1993, as\n   mandatory deadline, Fourth Circuit rules . . . Page A-4\n   http://pubs.bna.com/ip/BNA/dlr.nsf/id/a0a4w5x5a2_\n\nSAFETY & HEALTH\n   Labor Department's decision to set aside some provisions\n   in revised injury recordkeeping rule is applauded by\n   industry groups, but labor unions argue that changes will\n   skew national statistics . . . Page A-12\n   http://pubs.bna.com/ip/BNA/dlr.nsf/id/a0a4w6f7f8_\n\n   Nurse who accidentally stuck herself with needle used on\n   AIDS patient had sufficient cause for emotional distress\n   claim, Pennsylvania court rules . . . Page A-5\n   http://pubs.bna.com/ip/BNA/dlr.nsf/id/a0a4w5k5m3_\n\n   OSHA says safety professionals and employers at nearly\n   1.3 million worksites will have new forms for recording\n   on-the-job injuries and illnesses . . . Page A-11\n   http://pubs.bna.com/ip/BNA/dlr.nsf/id/a0a4w6f7e1_\n\nSEXUAL HARASSMENT\n   Nurse's assistant who was sexually assaulted by co-worker\n   can proceed with series of claims against upstate New\n   York health care facility, despite fact that employer\n   immediately suspended and later discharged alleged\n   attacker, federal magistrate judge holds . . . Page A-2\n   http://pubs.bna.com/ip/BNA/dlr.nsf/id/a0a4w5h5w4_\n\nSTATE EMPLOYEES\n   California Gov. Davis orders state agencies to freeze\n   hiring of new employees and reduce current fiscal year\n   spending by $150 million . . . Page A-9\n   http://pubs.bna.com/ip/BNA/dlr.nsf/id/a0a4w6f1j5_\n\nTRADE\n   Economist states that trade-related loss of more than 3\n   million jobs since 1994 should bolster opposition to\n   trade promotion authority legislation . . . Page A-10\n   http://pubs.bna.com/ip/BNA/dlr.nsf/id/a0a4w6e5n5_\n\n   Senior administration official says President Bush will\n   intensify efforts to get Congress to pass trade promotion\n   authority . . . Page A-11\n   http://pubs.bna.com/ip/BNA/dlr.nsf/id/a0a4w6f2v8_\n\nWORKFORCE REDUCTIONS\n   Eastman Kodak Co. plans to cut workforce by 3,500 to\n   4,000 jobs . . . Page A-13\n   http://pubs.bna.com/ip/BNA/dlr.nsf/id/a0a4w6d3m5_\n\n   Sears, Roebuck & Co. says it will pare nearly 5,000\n   employees from global payroll in three-year plan to\n   improve profitability and operational efficiencies . . .\n   Page A-10\n   http://pubs.bna.com/ip/BNA/dlr.nsf/id/a0a4w6f2f5_\n\n\n_____________\n\nECONOMIC NEWS\n_____________\n\nEARNINGS\n   Median weekly earnings of full-time U.S. workers rose 0.8\n   percent, inflation-adjusted, during year ended in third\n   quarter, Labor Department's Bureau of Labor Statistics\n   reports . . . Page D-6\n   http://pubs.bna.com/ip/BNA/dlr.nsf/id/a0a4w6g5n1_\n\nECONOMIC OUTLOOK\n   Many U.S. regions saw economic growth rebound in recent\n   weeks, Federal Reserve reports . . . Page D-12\n   http://pubs.bna.com/ip/BNA/dlr.nsf/id/a0a4w6h7v2_\n\nPERSONAL INCOME\n   U.S. personal income grew 0.8 percent in second quarter,\n   marked slowing from first three months of year, Commerce\n   Department says . . . Page D-1\n   http://pubs.bna.com/ip/BNA/dlr.nsf/id/a0a4w6g7p2_\n\n\n______________\n\nTABLE OF CASES\n______________\n\nBecker v. Ulster County (N.D.N.Y.) . . . Page A-2\n   http://pubs.bna.com/ip/BNA/dlr.nsf/id/a0a4w5h5w4_\n\nChao v. Local 54, HERE (D.N.J.) . . . Page A-3\n   http://pubs.bna.com/ip/BNA/dlr.nsf/id/a0a4w5k9t9_\n\nCity of Brooklyn Ctr. v. Law Enforcement Labor Servs. Inc.\n(Minn. Ct. App.) . . . Page A-7\n   http://pubs.bna.com/ip/BNA/dlr.nsf/id/a0a4w5g3r3_\n\nElam v. First Unum Life Ins. Co. (Ark.) . . . Page A-1\n   http://pubs.bna.com/ip/BNA/dlr.nsf/id/a0a4w6a7e7_\n\nHolland v. Pardee Coal Co. (4th Cir.) . . . Page A-4\n   http://pubs.bna.com/ip/BNA/dlr.nsf/id/a0a4w5x5a2_\n\nMartin v. Lake County Sewer Co. (6th Cir.) . . . Page A-8\n   http://pubs.bna.com/ip/BNA/dlr.nsf/id/a0a4w5m1t1_\n\nShumosky v. Lutheran Welfare Servs. of N.E. Pa. Inc. (Pa.\nSuper. Ct.) . . . Page A-5\n   http://pubs.bna.com/ip/BNA/dlr.nsf/id/a0a4w5k5m3_\n\nSprague v. Central States, S.E. and S.W. Areas Pension Fund\n(7th Cir.) . . . Page A-4\n   http://pubs.bna.com/ip/BNA/dlr.nsf/id/a0a4w5x5d6_\n\nSteiner Corp. v. Johnson & Higgins of Cal.  (10th Cir.) . .\n. Page A-9\n   http://pubs.bna.com/ip/BNA/dlr.nsf/id/a0a4w6e6w2_\n\n   __________\n   Daily Labor Report (ISSN 1522-5968) Highlights are\n   published daily by The Bureau of National Affairs, Inc.,\n   1231 25th St., NW, Washington, DC 20037.\n\n   For account information and changes, contact\n   1-800-372-1033 (M-F, 8:30 am-7:00 pm ET)\n\n   To request retransmission or to order a copy of the\n   summarized article, contact 1-800-452-7773 or e-mail\n   [email protected].\n\n   For copyright guidelines, go to\n   http://www.bna.com/corp/copyright.\n\n   Copyright (c) 2001 by The Bureau of National Affairs,\n   Inc.  Washington, D.C.  20037.  Use of this service is\n   subject to the terms and conditions of the license\n   agreement with BNA.  Unauthorized access or distribution\n   is prohibited."}
{"text": "Sara Shackleton\nEnron North America Corp.\n1400 Smith Street, EB 3801a\nHouston, Texas  77002\n713-853-5620 (phone)\n713-646-3490 (fax)\[email protected]\n----- Forwarded by Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT on 04/13/2001 08:56 AM -----\n\n\t\"Yaish, Yair (OGC)\" <[email protected]>\n\t04/13/2001 08:50 AM\n\t\t \n\t\t To: \"'[email protected]'\" <[email protected]>\n\t\t cc: \n\t\t Subject: FYI -- FERC Filing\n\n\nSara, I wanted to let u knwo that under the FERC rules, we have to file the \nEnron side letter for the physical master agreement in the same manner that \nwe filed the original agt between Enron and Allegheny.  Our PA office is \nhandling that and, if I am not mistaken, has taken of that yesterday.  I do \nnot think that EPMI is requried to file with the FERC because u are a power \namrekter, but I am wondering whether u do such filings anyway.\n\n-----Original Message-----\nFrom: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]\nSent: Friday, April 13, 2001 9:41 AM\nTo: [email protected]\nSubject: RE: ISDA Schedule/Paragraph 13\n\n\n\nYair:\n\nI've left a message with Tracy Ngo (in Portland) and will let you know as\nsoon as I hear from her.  How long will you be in the office today?\n\nSara Shackleton\nEnron North America Corp.\n1400 Smith Street, EB 3801a\nHouston, Texas  77002\n713-853-5620 (phone)\n713-646-3490 (fax)\[email protected]\n\n\n\n                    \"Yaish, Yair\n                    (OGC)\"                To:     \n\"'[email protected]'\" <[email protected]>\n                    <YYaish@exchan        cc:\n                    ge.ml.com>            Subject:     RE: ISDA \nSchedule/Paragraph 13\n\n                    04/13/2001\n                    08:28 AM\n\n\n\n\n\n\nSara, Allegheny would like to be able to assign to affilaites in the same\nmanner that we are allowing Enron to make an ssignment so long as the Gty\ngoes along.  In our case, however, there is no gty, hence the stipualtion\nthat such assignment must be to an entity with an equal or better credit\nrating.  If you wish, I can limit such assignment to an entity rated at\nleast BBB+ or better.  Would that resolve your concerns?\n\n-----Original Message-----\nFrom: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]\nSent: Thursday, April 12, 2001 12:26 PM\nTo: [email protected]\nSubject: RE: ISDA Schedule/Paragraph 13\n\n\n\nYair:\n\nIt's a good thing you didn't try to get back to me!  Sorrry.\n\n(See attached file: AlleghenyCPformacceptR1.DOC)\n\nSara Shackleton\nEnron North America Corp.\n1400 Smith Street, EB 3801a\nHouston, Texas  77002\n713-853-5620 (phone)\n713-646-3490 (fax)\[email protected]\n\n\n\n                    \"Yaish, Yair\n                    (OGC)\"                To:\n\"'[email protected]'\" <[email protected]>\n                    <YYaish@exchan        cc:\n                    ge.ml.com>            Subject:     RE: ISDA\nSchedule/Paragraph 13\n\n                    04/12/2001\n                    10:16 AM\n\n\n\n\n\n\nSara, sorry i didn't get back to you yesterday, I was out sick.  I didn't\nnotice anything attached, did u send a subsequent e-mail?\n\n-----Original Message-----\nFrom: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]\nSent: Wednesday, April 11, 2001 4:01 PM\nTo: [email protected]\nCc: [email protected]\nSubject: RE: ISDA Schedule/Paragraph 13\nImportance: High\n\n\n\nYair:\n\nAttached is my redline.  Call me so that we can discuss the remaining\nissues, including:\n\n(1)  Calculation Agent.  We believe that the existing dispute mechanism is\nadequate.\n\n(2)  Procedures for Entering into Transactions.  There is no procedure for\ndual confirms.  This is too confusing.\n\n(3)  Transfer.  We cannot agree to your assignment provision as it is too\nsubjective.\n\nThe other changes were not substantive.\n\n\nSara Shackleton\nEnron North America Corp.\n1400 Smith Street, EB 3801a\nHouston, Texas  77002\n713-853-5620 (phone)\n713-646-3490 (fax)\[email protected]\n\n\n\n                    \"Yaish, Yair\n                    (OGC)\"                To:\n\"'[email protected]'\" <[email protected]>\n                    <YYaish@exchan        cc:\n                    ge.ml.com>            Subject:     RE: ISDA\nSchedule/Paragraph 13\n\n                    04/10/2001\n                    07:46 AM\n\n\n\n\n\n\nSara, any thoughts on my comments ISDA I sent out last week?\n\n\n-----Original Message-----\nFrom: Yaish, Yair (OGC)\nSent: Thursday, April 05, 2001 6:19 PM\nTo: '[email protected]'\nSubject: RE: ISDA Schedule/Paragraph 13\n\n\nSara, I have good news, I think we are very close to executing this baby.\n\nI am attahcing comments to the ISDA.  They reflect comments by our outside\ncousel which highlight the differences between this contract and the side\nletter/ML ISDA.  They are not much.  I have also made some changes directly\non their draft where I either concurred with Enron or needed to make some\nof my own changes.  Pls review and let me know what you think.\n\nI will be leaving the office soon, so if we can wrap it up tomorrow that\nwould be great (I'm out Monday for Passover).\n\n\nYair Yaish\nDirector and Senior Counsel\nAllegheny Energy Global Markets, LLC\n212-236-7346\n\n\n\n-----Original Message-----\nFrom: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]\nSent: Friday, March 30, 2001 4:10 PM\nTo: [email protected]\nSubject: ISDA Schedule/Paragraph 13\n\n\nYair:\n\nAttached is a blacklined (against the Enron North America Corp. draft of\n3/15/01) Schedule and Paragraph 13 to the ISDA Credit Support Annex.  I\nhave tried to incorporate the essence of the March 19, 2001 \"swap side\nletter agreement.\"  Please call me to discuss as it would be nice to\nfinalize by April 6.  Thanks.\n\n(See attached file: 098a Blackline ctr (Allegheny Energy Supply).doc)\n\n\nSara Shackleton\nEnron North America Corp.\n1400 Smith Street, EB 3801a\nHouston, Texas  77002\n713-853-5620 (phone)\n713-646-3490 (fax)\[email protected]"}
{"text": "did you buy any enron in the 60s?"}
{"text": "I don't.  Why did you think about me when you heard Shackles?\n\n -----Original Message-----\nFrom: \tDavis, Dana  \nSent:\tFriday, October 26, 2001 11:18 AM\nTo:\tDavis, Angelic\nSubject:\tRE: \n\nDo you have any of their cd's?  The one with the song \"Shackles\"?  I was listening to it this morning and I thought about you.\n\n -----Original Message-----\nFrom: \tDavis, Angelic  \nSent:\tFriday, October 26, 2001 11:17 AM\nTo:\tDavis, Dana\nSubject:\tRE: \n\nYes.  I love their music.\n\n -----Original Message-----\nFrom: \tDavis, Dana  \nSent:\tFriday, October 26, 2001 11:15 AM\nTo:\tDavis, Angelic\nSubject:\tRE: \n\nHave you heard of Mary Mary?\n\n -----Original Message-----\nFrom: \tDavis, Angelic  \nSent:\tFriday, October 26, 2001 11:14 AM\nTo:\tDavis, Dana\nSubject:\tRE: \n\nI listen to both.\n\n -----Original Message-----\nFrom: \tDavis, Dana  \nSent:\tFriday, October 26, 2001 11:14 AM\nTo:\tDavis, Angelic\nSubject:\t\n\nMy Instant Messenger isn't working for some reason but all I wanted was to ask you do you listen to gospel music and what kind if you do?  Traditional or contemporary?"}
{"text": "Any GCP Adjustments will be highighted in blue.  If you have any questions, \nplease feel free to give me a call.\n\n\n\n\nAmber N Ebow x5-8331\nGlobal Counterparty_Enron Net Works\n\n\n\n\nFrom: Aparna Rajaram/ENRON@enronXgate on 05/02/2001 09:50 AM\nTo: Amber Ebow/HOU/ECT@ECT\ncc:  \nSubject: FW: Click Paper Approvals, 05-01-01\n\n\n\n -----Original Message-----\nFrom:  Rajaram, Aparna  \nSent: Wednesday, May 02, 2001 8:50 AM\nTo: Lombardi, Kelly; Schott, Samuel; Rodriguez, Bernice; Hare, Bill; \nVenturatos, Steve; Gerard, Camille; Schott, Samuel; Rohauer, Tanya; Moran, \nTom; Jones, Tana; Davis, Frank L.; Curry, Ken; Hunter, Nicole; Campbell, Lesli\nSubject: Click Paper Approvals, 05-01-01\n\nPlease see attached.\n\n\n\nAparna Rajaram\nPh: (713) 345-4563\nFax: (713) 853-9476\[email protected]"}
{"text": "Michael -\n\nKen Lay said to tell you this is fine.\n\nRosalee\n\n\n\n\n\"Telle, Michael S.\" <[email protected]> on 10/02/2000 10:18:00 AM\nTo: \"'[email protected]'\" <[email protected]>\ncc: \"Watson, John\" <[email protected]> \nSubject: Referendum Campaign\n\n\nMr. Lay--\n\nDuring the negotiations with the Rockets as to how much each party would\ncontribute to the Arena referendum campaign, Mike Goldberg of Baker & Botts\nsuggested that the Rockets would like to net their contribution obligation\nagainst other contributions that they solicited.\n\nAfter a conversation with you, John Watson and I advised Mike Goldberg that\nyou did not want to be competing with the Rockets in soliciting\ncontributions to the Arena referendum campaign.\n\nMike Goldberg called Friday and asked whether it would be acceptable for the\nRockets to net against their contribution obligation contributions that they\nhave solicited from Baker & Botts, Jim MacInvale and Tilman Fertitta.  Mike\nsuggested that these three persons would be the only outside persons that\nwould be solicited by the Rockets.\n\nWould you please let me know if this is acceptable to you.  You or Rosalee\nmay call me at 713-758-2350 or send me a response e-mail at\[email protected].\n\nSincerely,\n\nMichael S. Telle"}
{"text": "I'll take your Visa.  Just let me know when you've mailed it.    You have a \nPlatinum card, right?\n\nR\n\n\n\n\n\"Paul Rodrigue\" <[email protected]> on 08/30/2000 08:46:28 AM\nTo: [email protected]\ncc:  \nSubject: Re: Mom's b-day\n\n\nIt's nice to know I have good tastes. I think I did a good job picking out \nboth b-day presents. Do you want me to mail a check or do you take Visa?\n\nI decided to let you use them. It's too hot up here to use them. Maybe if it \never rains. If you like them, I got them at a store up here for a really good \nprice, but you probably have such places down there too. You won't become a \ngolf junkie after you find out how much they want to actually let you play \ngolf on one of those nice green courses. It's a little more than the driving \nrange.\n\nGlad to hear that you're really not a vampire.\n\nMy company was named one of the 100 Best managed manufacturing companies by \nIndustry Week. It's been a real joke around here. We're not sure what they \nwere smoking when they made that decision. (Note the irony in using company \nemail to say this...BTW...I have an interview with Arthur Anderson on the 8th)\n\nPaul\n>>> <[email protected]> 8/30/2000 8:21:45 AM >>>\n\nYou got her a $100 gift certificate to Talbot's (a women's clothing store).\nYou did a very good job picking it out.\n\nThanks for the golf clubs by the way.  I thought you weren't going to send\nthem, so I was surprised when Karon told me she had them.  I'll hold them\nfor ransom until I get paid back for the birthdays!!  I actually went to\nthe driving range this weekend.  I definitely think I could get hooked on\nthis sport.  Hopefully I won't become one of the \"golf junkies\" but I'm not\nsure you can avoid it.  I was watching a golf infomercial the other day\nthinking \"I need that!\"\n\nWell back to work.  Did I tell you I'm working daylight hours again?\n\nTalk to ya later,\nRobin"}
{"text": "What an awful mess.\n\n\n\n\n\n\"Thompson, Peter J.\" <[email protected]> on 11/15/2000 08:13:27 AM\nTo: <[email protected]>\ncc:  \n\nSubject: RE: Blackline\n\nWe also used CompareRite.  However, when the system swithched over the\nweekend, our current tool bars no longer work with Word as presently\nconfigured. In addition, those documents that had automated headings.\netc. now are incompatible with the new versions.  We are having an\noutside vendor try to clean the documents up so that they will be\ncompatible and Houston IT is working on fixing our tool bars.\n-----Original Message-----\nFrom: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]\nSent: Wednesday, November 15, 2000 8:29 AM\nTo: Thompson, Peter J.\nSubject: RE: Blackline\n\n\n\nI've found CompareRite to work with long documents.  Plus, these\ndocuments\nstarted out as WordPerfect documents and were converted to Word, which I\nthink creates problems with Word comparisons.  I figure it is a Gates\nconspiracy...\n\nKay\n\n\n\n\n\"Thompson, Peter J.\" <[email protected]> on 11/14/2000 07:33:34 PM\n\nTo:   <[email protected]>\ncc:\n\nSubject:  RE: Blackline\n\nYours is much better.\n\n-----Original Message-----\nFrom: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]\nSent: Tuesday, November 14, 2000 10:26 AM\nTo: Thompson, Peter J.\nSubject: Blackline\n\n\nHere's the blackline I prepared, so you can see which looks better.\n\n(See attached file: COMPARE6TO5)\n\nHere it is as a Word file, just in case:\n\n(See attached file: COMPARE6TO5.doc)"}
{"text": "Here's what we (Sue L. and me) want to give to Scott Celey (aid to Gov. Hull \nfrom Arizona).  She's interested in putting together a letter warning about \nbalkanization for signature by the other Republican governors."}
{"text": "Hari,\n\nI shall send you a reprint of the  article. I had to\ncancel my presentation at San Antonio.\n\nVince\n\nShirley,\n\nPlease, send a copy of the article to Hari.\n\n\n\n\n\n\nHari Natrajan <[email protected]> on 02/28/2001 06:45:29 AM\nTo: \"'[email protected]'\" <[email protected]>\ncc:  \nSubject: \n\n\nDear Mr. Kaminski,\n\nI am a doctoral student at the Indian Institute of Management Bangalore,\nIndia.  My area of interest is the Energy Sector, especially Electricity\nDerivatives. I am interested in obtaining a copy of the following items:\n\n1) Your presentation \"Current Challenges in Modeling Power Price Volatility\"\nat the session on Price Volatility & Probabilistic Methods in the Energy\nMarkets.  (http://www.informs.org/Conf/SanAntonio2000//TALKS/MD29.html)\n\n2) Your chapter \"The Challenge of Pricing and Risk Managing Electricity\nDerivatives\" in the book 'The US Power Market', Risk Publications.\n\nI would appreciate it if you could send me a soft/hard copy of the same.\n\n\nThank you,\n\nYours sincerely,\n\nHari Natarajan\nFellowship Student\nIndian Institute of Management Bangalore\nBannerghatta Road\nBangalore 560076\nIndia\nTel: 91-80-6993056\nFax: 91-80-6584050\nE-mail: [email protected]"}
{"text": "Net Works section of the NYC presentation.  MEK\n---------------------- Forwarded by Mark Koenig/Corp/Enron on 07/21/2000 \n03:42 PM ---------------------------\n\n\nMichael Darnall\n07/20/2000 05:32 PM\nTo: Greg Whalley/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mike McConnell/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeffrey \nMcMahon/HOU/ECT@ECT\ncc: Mark Koenig/Corp/Enron@ENRON \n\nSubject: Latest Net Work Section for 2Q"}
{"text": "I'm flying to Richmond this am.  I'll read the ABB contract on the plane, and \nlet you know what I think this afternoon.  Hopefully, we can put it to bed.\n\nKay"}
{"text": "-----Original Message-----\nFrom:  Fairley, David  \nSent: Thursday, May 24, 2001 11:15 AM\nTo: Rorschach, Reagan\nSubject: RE: Open items for MDEA\n\n\n\n -----Original Message-----\nFrom:  Mann, Kay  \nSent: Wednesday, May 23, 2001 5:06 PM\nTo: Rorschach, Reagan; Kroll, Heather; Fairley, David; May, Tom\nSubject: Open items for MDEA\n\n[Fairley, David]  \n\n\nHere are issues which I'm unclear about, all of which impact the drafting of \nthe agreement:\n\n\nHow are we setting the heat rate?  Do we have the GADS (?)?  Is it a daily \naverage, weekly average?  Flat rate? Adjusted? If so, how often?\n[Fairley, David]  \nEach utility is obligated to provide the heat rate information to use in the \nappropriate Exhibit and the Stack Model.  As conditions change the utilities \nmust update this info.  We are tracking heat rates based on actual fuel \nusage.  Services and Orig agreed yesterday to add language that requires a \nquarterly review of heat rate data to determine if the assumptions being used \nare satisfactiry -- it can never be exact, but it should be accurate within a \nband of acceptability.  No GADS.  Heat rates will be adjusted in the model as \noften as necessary to account for significant changes such as hotter ambient \ntemps..\n\nAre we comfortable that there are no permit restrictions?\n[Fairley, David]  \nYes, their units are too small.  We have discussed this with the customer, \nand with our internal air permit guys.\n[Rorschach, Reagan]  They have Title V permits, and they are faxing them to \nus today.  They have no run hour limitations on gas, however, they are \nlimited on oil.  Will need to get that summary to Kay as soon as possible.\n\n\nWe have determined that we won't deal with fuel oil, right?\n[Fairley, David]  \nWe won't buy and sell fuel oil.  We may dispatch on oil at start-up, or we \nmay switch to oil and sell the gas if profitable, which constitutes a Product \ntransaction with the resulting profit split.\n[Rorschach, Reagan]  We need to state that MDEA and Cities are responsible \nfor maintaining fuel oil supplies.\n\nWe aren't making money on gas, right?\n[Fairley, David]  \nWe make money on gas two ways.  The first is outside the contract, and is \nbasicly any internal profit on re-sale of gas to the Cities.  The second way \nwe can make money on gas is when the gas trade is in the form of a Product \ntrade, and those procedures apply.\n\nDo we have a defn of costs that we like yet, and if so, how does it fit in to \nthe picture?\n[Fairley, David]  \nYes, will send separately.\n\nIs there an up-to-date set of exhibits?  \n[Fairley, David]  \nThe Marketing Strategy, the Trading and Risk Policy, and the Description of \nAsset Management have been upated.  The other Exhibits have not been \nmodified.  The Marketing Strategy and Trading & Risk Policy have been \ndiscussed at length with MDEA (MDEA commercial, not legal), and their \ncomments/questions incorporated.\n  \n \n\nIt would help if theh commercial part of the team could send me the \nfollowing, in words and/or formulae:\n\nThe defn and method of establishing the bogey (target production cost) \nformula can be an exhibit, which would be great for the commercial team to \nwork on.  \n[Fairley, David]  \nThought we had this covered in the definitions and obligations of the \nparties.  Will look at it again.  Conceptually, MDEA, Services Group, and \nOrig are in full agreement, so we need to make sure that the contract \nlanguage is clear enough.\n[Rorschach, Reagan]  See attached exhibit detailing the calc with an example.\n\n Are we determined how we should deal with imbalances (part of cost of \npower)? \n[Fairley, David]  \nThere are three considerations on this: (1) who wears imbalance exposure?, \n(2) who manages imbalances (hourly type activity), and (3) who pays for \nimbalances?  Imbalances are billed by Entergy directly to MDEA under their \nNetwork Services Agreement.  EPMI's hourly desk manages the load/resource \nitems hourly, but MDEA has the exposure (physical and price) to imbalances.  \nWeather/load changes, and fluctuations in supply create hourly imbalances \n(they happen, they are uncontrollable, and we fix them) which EPMI's hourly \ndesk manages as part of the imbalance service described in the definitions \nand obligations of the parties.  A different section in the contract states \nthat MDEA wears the exposure.\n\n How are we setting the bogey?    Formula?   [Fairley, David]  The bogey is \nset when the load projection and stack models are run each day.  Both parties \nparticipate by providing certain necessary info and discussing results and \nplanning the day's activities.  \n[Rorschach, Reagan]  Records of bogey decisions will be archieved\n\nSubject to audit?  [Fairley, David]    Yes, but they would be auditing \nsomething that is jointly derived each day.  Frankly, they would like to have \nless involvement; ie, they trust us to do it all, but we are requiring them \nto participate and buy in every day.  \n\nTwo bogeys or one (gas and oil)?\n[Fairley, David]  \nOne bogey for power.  Gas is an input for determining the bogey.\n[Rorschach, Reagan]  Bogey set day-ahead.\n\nWhat is defn of profit?  I think I have the general idea, but a sentence or \ntwo would be helpful as a reality check.  \n[Fairley, David]  \nThis is in the pricing calc's.  Should we have a definition?\n\nWhat costs are included on the buy and sell side [Fairley, David]  see cost \ndefinition being provided separately.\n \n\n\n\nRe stack model: a sentence or two describing what it is and how it is used. \n[Fairley, David]    See definition in my mark-up's to the main agreement. \n\nUpdated exhibit on facilities, contracted resources, operating limits. \n[Fairley, David]   Services and Orig are reviewing these, but other than what \nwas mentioned above, probably no changes unless you see a specific area that \nis a problem. \n\nWhat information does MDEA need for us to provide in order to split \ncosts/profits?  Are we clear that Cities buy gas, MDEA buys/sells power?\n[Rorschach, Reagan]  I will be getting exhibits of the reporting both daily \nand monthly.  We need to make sure to limit our info providing \nresponsibilities to those reports.\n\nIt would be great if I could get one set of answers to these \nquestions/issues, which has commercial buy in all around.\n\nThanks,\n\nKay"}
{"text": "<<City of Austin Gas Turbine Agt - Blackline of  83017 v.5 to v.7.DOC>>\n\n\n Attached is a blackline of the City of Austin Turbine Agreement\nshowing changes made to the version that went to GE on February 12. This\ndraft includes both Lee's and Eric's changes to Exhibit A, as well as\nthe addition of the contacts for notices in Sections 25.1 and 25.3.  It\nalso contains a few minor clean-up items identified by Lisa Bills when\nshe reviewed LV Cogen (e.g., the definitions of Performance Test\nCertificate and Performance Test Completion Certificate were out of\norder).  To complete the agreement, we will need to include the date of\nexecution and Exhibit H-2.  I particularly wanted Eric to review this\nbefore it went to the other side.  If it looks acceptable, I would be\nhappy to send a copy to GE. \n - City of Austin Gas Turbine Agt - Blackline of  83017 v.5 to v.7.DOC"}
{"text": "This is just a reminder that Grace's 'farewell' lunch is today at 11:45 at Todai restaurant (see map below).\nThere will also be a 'goodbye' Happy Hour starting at 4:30 pm at the Steak and Chophouse (see map below)\n\nHope to see you guys there!\n  \nVirginia\n\nMAP to Todai:  http://maps.yahoo.com/py/maps.py?Pyt=Typ&addr=340+Sw+Morrison+St+Ste+4305&city=Portland&state=OR&csz=Portland,+OR+97204-2438&slt=45.518305&sln=-122.676013&mlt=45.518191&mln=-122.675581&name=&zip=97204-2438&country=us&BFKey=&BFCat=&BFClient=&mag=9&desc=&cs=9&newmag=10&poititle=&poi=&ds=n\n  \n\nMAP to Steak and Chophouse:   http://maps.yahoo.com/py/maps.py?Pyt=Typ&addr=121+SW+3rd+Ave&city=Portland&state=OR&csz=Portland,+OR+97204&slt=45.522100&sln=-122.673600&name=Portland+Steak+%26+Chophouse&zip=97204&country=us&&BFKey=&BFCat=&BFClient=&mag=8&desc=(503)+223-6200&cs=9&newmag=10&poititle=&poi=&ds=n"}
{"text": "Here are the new Fixed O&M numbers.  I have not talked to Teco yet to clarify \nthe other expenses, si these are just taking out the Marketing Fee.  Thanks\nBen"}
{"text": "---------------------- Forwarded by Chad Starnes/Corp/Enron on 01/15/2001 \n09:15 AM ---------------------------\n   \n\t\n\t\n\tFrom:  Office of the Chairman                           01/12/2001 07:31 PM\n\t\n\nSent by: Office of the Chairman\nTo: All Enron Worldwide\ncc:  \n\nSubject: Managing Director and Vice President Elections\n\nThe Managing Director PRC Committee met this week to elect individuals to \nManaging Director and Vice President positions.  These employees are \nrecognized as outstanding contributors to the organization, whose individual \nefforts have been instrumental in the continued success and growth of the \ncompany.  We are pleased to announce the election of the following new \nManaging Directors and Vice Presidents.  Please join us in congratulating \nthese individuals on their new appointments.\n\nManaging Director \u0001) Commercial\n\nPhillip K. Allen, ENA (EWS) West Gas Trading - Houston\nFranklin R. Bay, EBS Entertainment on Demand - Houston\nTimothy N. Belden, ENA (EWS) \u0001) West Power Trading - Portland\nMichael R. Brown, EEL \u0001) Executive - London\nChristopher F. Calger, ENA (EWS) West Power Origination - Portland\nJoseph M. Deffner, ENA (EWS) Treasury & Funding - Houston\nTimothy J. Detmering, ENA (EWS) Corporate Development - Houston\nWilliam D. Duran, ENA (EWS) Generation Investments - Houston\nRobert S. Gahn, EES Commodity Structuring - Houston\nKevin C. Garland, EBS Broadband Ventures - Houston\nBen F. Glisan, Jr., Corporate \u0001) Global Equity Markets - Houston\nRobert E. Hayes, ETS COMM Marketing - Houston\nPhillip R. Milnthorp, ENA (EWS) Canada Origination & Trading - Calgary\n\nManaging Director \u0001) Commercial Support\n\nSally W. Beck, ENW (EWS) Energy Operations Management - Houston\nFernley Dyson, EEL Finance & Support Services - London\n\nVice President \u0001) Commercial\n\nGregory Adams, EES MMC Management - Houston\nRobert Bayley, EEL-UK Origination \u0001) London\nJack D. Boatman, ETS Market Development \u0001) Houston\nRhenn Cherry, EES Assets/Labor \u0001) Houston\nNiamh Clarke, EGM (EWS) Liquids Trading \u0001) London\nPeter Crilly, EEL-UK Origination \u0001) London\nDerek J. Davies, ENA (EWS) Canada Origination \u0001) Calgary\nMark D. Davis, Jr., ENA (EWS) East Power Trading \u0001) Houston\nCharles Delacey, Corporate Finance \u0001) Houston\nPaul Devries, ENA (EWS) Canada Origination \u0001) Toronto\nChristopher H. Foster, ENA (EWS) West Power Trading \u0001) Portland\nJeffrey F. Golden, EES Corporate Development \u0001) Houston\nMichael D. Grigsby, ENA West Gas Trading Group - Houston\nTroy A. Henry, EES Bundled Sales-Heavy Industrial \u0001) Houston\nRogers Herndon, ENA (EWS) East Power Trading \u0001) Houston\nJames W. Lewis, EES Underwriting \u0001) Houston\nChristopher Mahoney, EGM (EWS) Liquids Trading \u0001) London\nAndrew Marsden, EBS Broadband Ventures \u0001) London\nJohn McClain, EBS Broadband Wholesale Origination \u0001) Houston\nKevin J. McGowan, EGM (EWS) American Coal \u0001) Houston\nAlbert E. McMichael, Jr., ENA (EWS) Gas Commodity Structuring \u0001) Houston\nErmes I. Melinchon, Central America Origination \u0001) Houston\nSteven R. Meyers, EES Consumption \u0001) Houston\nLloyd D. Miller, ENA (EWS) Portfolio Management \u0001) Houston\nMichael A. Miller, Wind Development / Execution-General Administration \u0001) \nHouston\nMarcello Romano, EBS EEL-Broadband Trading \u0001) London\nDavid A. Samuels, ENW (EWS) EnronOnline - Houston\nPer A. Sekse, EGM (EWS) Global Risk Markets \u0001) New York\nEdward S. Smida, EBS Video on Demand \u0001) Houston\nMark Tawney, EGM (EWS) Weather Trading \u0001) Houston\nJon Thomsen, EBS Business Development \u0001) Latin America/Canada \u0001) Portland\nBarry L. Tycholiz, ENA (EWS) West Gas Origination - Houston\nFrank W. Vickers, ENA (EWS) East Gas Origination \u0001) Houston\nAmit Walia, Corporate, Corporate Development \u0001) Houston\nWilliam White, EBS Global Bandwidth Risk Mgmt \u0001) Houston\nJonathan Whitehead, EEL EA Trading \u0001) Japan\nMark Whitt, ENA (EWS) West Gas Origination \u0001) Denver\nJohn A. Zufferli, ENA (EWS) Canada Power Trading - Calgary\n\nVice President \u0001) Commercial Support\n\nBeth Apollo, EEL Financial Operations Executive \u0001) London\nMarla Barnard, EBS Human Resources \u0001) Houston\nKaren L. Denne, Corporate, Public Relations \u0001) Houston\nGeorganne M. Hodges, ENA (EWS) Trading, Origination & Power Plant Accounting \n\u0001) Houston\nPhillip Lord, EEL Transaction Support \u0001) London\nPeggy Mahoney, EES Marketing \u0001) Communication \u0001) Houston\nSteven Montovano, Corporate, Government & Regulatory Affairs \u0001) Dublin\nLaura Scott, ENA (EWS) Canada Accounting \u0001) Calgary\nRichard C. Sherman, ENA (EWS) Transaction Support \u0001) Houston\nGregory W. Stubblefield, EES Financial Planning & Reporting \u0001) Houston\nDennis D. Vegas, CALME International Public Relations \u0001) Houston\n\nVice President \u0001) Specialized Technical \n\nSami Arap Sobrinho, ESA (EWS) Legal \u0001) Houston\nMerat Bagha, EBS Sales Engineering \u0001) Houston\nJustin Boyd, EEL Legal \u0001) London\nMary Nell Browning, EBS Legal \u0001) London\nJonathan Chapman, EEL Legal \u0001) London\nRobert D. Eickenroht, Corporate, Legal \u0001) Houston\nMark Evans, EEL Legal \u0001) London\nDavid Forster, ENW (EWS) EnronOnline \u0001) Houston\nJanine Juggins, EEL Tax \u0001) London\nPeter C. Keohane, ENA (EWS) Canada Legal \u0001) Calgary\nPinnamaneni V. Krishnarao, ENA (EWS) Research Group \u0001) Houston\nTravis C. McCullough, ENA (EWS) Finance Origination, Mergers/Acquisitions \u0001) \nHouston\nMichael Popkin, ESA (EWS) SA- Risk Management/Network Integration \u0001) Houston\nElizabeth A. Sager, ENA (EWS) Physical Trading \u0001) Houston\nRichard B. Sanders, ENA (EWS) Litigation \u0001) Houston\nJohn W. Schwartzenburg, EECC Legal \u0001) Houston\nMichael D. Smith, EES Legal \u0001) Houston\nMarcus Vonbock Und Polach, EEL Legal \u0001) London\nJay C. Webb, ENW (EWS) EnronOnline Systems \u0001) Houston\n\nVice President \u0001) Technical\n\nDonald R. Hawkins, ETS Quality Management \u0001) Houston\nJohn R. Keller, ETS Engineering & Construction \u0001) Houston"}
{"text": "Good Morning Ken,\n\nGood weekend?\n\nliz\n\n\n\n\n\"Hoskins, Kenneth\" <[email protected]> on 01/29/2001 10:11:18 AM\nTo: \"'[email protected]'\" <[email protected]>\ncc: \"'[email protected]'\" <[email protected]> \nSubject: \n\n\nPlease see below a summary of E&P weekly from CSFB research team.  The\ncomplete report is attached for your review.\n\n> 1) Group rebounds from over-sold position advancing 4%, leaders include\n> Swift, Ocean, Mitchell, Louis Dreyfus and Canadian Natural.\n> 2) Despite weather related selling pressure on near month natural gas\n> prices, the out months remain strong between $5.50 and $6.00.\n> 3) With 20% of US gas production reporting, volumes declined 1.6%\n> sequentially and 5.5% versus 4Q99. Volumes declined 4% in 2000 versus\n> 1999.\n> 4) Value creation update: 5 companies reported increasing value by 29%\n> on average, leaders include Pogo, Ocean and Pioneer.\n>\n>\n <<EnP012901.pdf>>\nRegards,\n\nKenneth F. Hoskins\nPrivate Client Services\nCredit Suisse First Boston\n\nDonaldson, Lufkin & Jenrette Securities Corporation\n an affiliate of\nCREDIT SUISSE FIRST BOSTON CORPORATION\n\n401 City Avenue, Suite 110\nBala Cynwyd, PA 19004-1122\n\noffice: (610) 660-8914\n   cell: (301) 922-9932\nemail: [email protected]\n\n\nThe information contained herein is provided, at your request, for\ninformational purposes only.  We make no representation as to its accuracy\nor completeness.  Also, this information does not supersede confirmations or\nstatements sent to you by DLJ.  Further, it does not constitute an offer to\nbuy or sell these securities.\n\n\n\n - EnP012901.pdf"}
{"text": "Hi John,\n\nMark and I are still working at the hotel, waiting to hear from the \ncounterparty.  \n\nCould you forward this to Jon?  I don't have his email address.\n\nThanks,\n\nKay\n---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 02/01/2001 08:34 \nAM ---------------------------\n\n\n\"Mark Bernstein\" <[email protected]> on 02/01/2001 08:30:37 AM\nTo: [email protected]\ncc:  \n\nSubject: coop city outline\n\nKay,\n \nI don't have the \"sent\" e-mail, but here is my outline:\n \nthank\n \nASSET MANAGEMENT\n1. Every December 1 the benchmark is set for next year\u0001,s gas cost. The \nbenchmark is adjusted for basis and transport.\n2. The benchmark for gas purchases will be adjusted for a gas load factor to \naccount for the non-block nature of gas consumption.\n3. Enron will serve full requirements power and steam at the benchmark cost.\n4. If unit 1 is down, Enron will serve Co-op City based on prevailing gas \nmarket price.\n5. If Enron does nothing but serve power and steam from the project, actual \ncost will equal benchmark cost and Enron earns nothing.\n6. If Enron can shut down the generators and buy power cheaper from the \nmarket than it could generate and sell the gas for a profit, the net reduces \nthe average cost of gas.\n7. Enron is only incentivized to buy gas and sell power or buy power and sell \ngas if there is a net benefit to Co-op City\n8. A Co-op City book will be kept and audited to keep track of the gas and \npower purchases and sales to calculate the asset management performance.\nDEVELOPMENT RISK CAPITAL\n1. Enron will commit development risk capital for:\nPermit preparation and application\nPreliminary engineering\nSite due diligence\nSecuring turbines\n1. Need to negotiate terms for development agreement\nENGINEERING, PROCUREMENT AND CONSTRUCTION\n1. Enron will perform EPC services at cost plus up to an estimate. The plus \nhowever, is not at risk.\n2. The EPC contract must be executed after the asset management agreement so \nthat there is no appearance of consideration between the two agreements.\n3. Commercial operations date will float relative to the issuance of permits.\nOPERATIONS\n1. Enron will dispatch the plant and procure gas and power so as to maximize \nplant efficiency and economics per the asset management agreement.\nMAINTENANCE\n1. Enron will act as agent on behalf of Co-op City to negotiate a long term \nmaintenance agreement, with a third party, subject to Co-op City\u0001,s approval.\n2. Enron will manage the maintenance contract and coordinate planned outages \nso as to maximize project value under the asset management agreement.\n\nGet your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com"}
{"text": "Carol,\n\nThanks.\n\nVince\n\n\n\n\n\n\tCarol Coats\n\t10/12/2000 04:09 PM\n\t\nTo: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT\ncc: Stinson Gibner/HOU/ECT@ECT \nSubject: Re: Datren Williams Acceptance\n  \n\nYou are right, Vince....Celeste and I did discuss it, and she approved his \nFeb. start date.\nDatren does know about that, so it sounds like it is cleared up.\n\nThanks so much, and we are sorry for the confusion!\nCarol\n\n\n\n\nVince J Kaminski\n10/12/2000 03:58 PM\nTo: Stinson Gibner/HOU/ECT@ECT\ncc: Carol Coats/HOU/ECT@ECT \nSubject: Re: Datren Williams Acceptance\n  \n\nStinson,\n\nI think it's a mistake. It  should be February.\n\nVince\n\n\n\n\n\nStinson Gibner\n10/10/2000 08:11 PM\nTo: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT\ncc:  \nSubject: Datren Williams Acceptance\n\n\nFYI\n\n---------------------- Forwarded by Stinson Gibner/HOU/ECT on 10/10/2000 \n08:10 PM ---------------------------\n\n\n\tCarol Coats\n\t09/29/2000 02:36 PM\n\t\nTo: Celeste Roberts/HOU/ECT@ECT\ncc: Stinson Gibner/HOU/ECT@ECT \nSubject: Datren Williams Acceptance\n\n\nCeleste, \n\nI just received Datren Williams' acceptance with the following note attached:\n\n\"My graduation date (Ph.D. Candidate from LSU) is Dec. 2000.  Celeste Roberts\nhas informed me that I would have the option of starting work Feb. 2001.  I am\nunder the impression that I will start in Feb. 2001.  My offer letter has a \nstart date \nof Aug. 2001.  If this is a problem, please give me a call.  \nLooking forward to working at Enron.\n\nThanks a million,\nDatren W.\"\n\nPlease let me know if he may in fact start in Feb. 2001, and if so, do you \nhave\na specific date for him, or may he choose?\n\nThanks, Celeste,\nCarol"}
{"text": "Now that two settlement proposals and a motion to extend time have been \nfiled, there is no telling what the CPUC will do.  My recommendation is that \nwe play it safe and assume we will need to file testimony on April 17.  To \nthat end, it's time to review some basics.\n\nIn its July 8, 1999 decision, the Commission stated:  \"We see reason to \npursue a change in protocol for receiving gas at Hector Road, even in the \nshort term.  If there are burdens that would unfairly fall upon Transwestern \ncustomers is a window was established at Hector Road, we want to hear about \nit in the next phase of the proceeding.  In addition, we seek specific \nproposals as to how such an arrangement should be defined.\"\n\nAccordingly, the testimony we file should explain:\n\n1.  The unfair harm that could potentially befall TW customers if Hector Road \nwere established as a formal receipt point\n2.   Our proposal for making Hector a formal receipt point by establishing \nprimary and secondary receipt points\n3.  Why our proposal is fair and consistent with Commission policy (here we \nmight want to draw analogies to the interstate system and explain why that \nworks)\n\nI will also have an opportunity to make legal and policy arguments in a brief \nafter testimony has been filed.\n\nLet's discuss how best to go about drafting the testimony.  I think the best \nthing to do would be to outline the testimony, then decide who is going to \nsay what.  I'm available after about 2:00 today."}
{"text": "Tana, we had to approve them for US steel products.  Per the comments in my \nspreadsheet, London will have to set them up.  This was for informational \npurposes only.\n\n -----Original Message-----\nFrom:  Jones, Tana  \nSent: Monday, April 02, 2001 6:26 PM\nTo: Guidroz, Walter\nSubject: Re: EOL approvals, 03-29-01\n\nRe:  Usinor SA:  that appears to be a London counterparty.  It should not be \non our list.  London Legal should approve their counterparties for ALL \nproducts, not only European based.\n\n\n\n\n\tWalter Guidroz/ENRON@enronXgate 03/29/2001 02:10 PM \t   To: Karen \nLambert/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT, Samuel Schott/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark \nTaylor/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brant Reves/ENRON@enronXgate, Debbie R \nBrackett/HOU/ECT@ECT, David Hardy/LON/ECT@ECT, Lesli \nCampbell/ENRON@enronXgate, Cynthia Clark/ENRON@enronXgate, Enron Europe \nGlobal Contracts and Facilities@ENRON, Enron Europe Global \nCounterParty/LON/ECT@ECT, Stephanie Sever/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tom \nMoran/ENRON@enronXgate, Claudia Clark/HOU/ECT@ECT, William S \nBradford/ENRON@enronXgate, Lisa Lees/HOU/ECT@ECT, Juana \nFayett/Corp/Enron@Enron, Jana Morse/Corp/Enron@Enron, Trang Le/HOU/ECT@ECT, \nPaul Maley/LON/ECT@ECT, Sonya Clarke/LON/ECT@ECT, Tim Davies/LON/ECT@ECT, \nKaren O'Day/NA/Enron@Enron, Tanya Rohauer/ENRON@enronXgate, Kelly \nLombardi/NA/Enron@Enron, Brian Lindsay/Enron Communications@Enron \nCommunications, EOL Call Center@ENRON, Bernice Rodriguez/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bill D \nHare/HOU/ECT@ect, Amy Heffernan/Enron Communications@Enron Communications, \nMolly LaFuze/Enron Communications@Enron Communications, Danny Clark/Enron \nCommunications@Enron Communications  cc:   Subject: EOL approvals, 03-29-01\n\n\nPlease see attached.\n\n << File: EOL 03-29-01.xls >>"}
{"text": "Probably won't get to it until after the 1st is done.  I think it will be \neasy to figure out though.\n\n\n\n\n\[email protected] on 09/27/2000 03:38:43 PM\nTo: \" - *[email protected]\" <[email protected]>\ncc:  \nSubject: Ashland Chemical\n\n\nChris,\n\nHave you been able to figure out if Enron has billed Ashland for Jan, Feb and\nMar on an old 1022/day Columbia contract?  If so, please let me know so we can\nmake the appropriate adjustment with the Ashland volumes.\n\nThanks"}
{"text": "Geir Solberg in Real Time is fixing this right now - I'll let you know the \nnew deal number in just a second.\n\nThanks,\nKate\n\n\n\n\nRhonda L Denton\n04/25/2001 01:13 PM\nTo: Kate Symes/PDX/ECT@ECT\ncc:  \n\nSubject: Re: 581368  \n\nCan you kill this deal or zero out the volumes?  thanks.\n\n\n   Kate Symes                04/24/2001 05:27 PM\n\nTo: Rhonda L Denton/HOU/ECT@ECT\ncc:  \nSubject: Re: 581368  \n\nI just spoke with Jesse Bryson in Real Time, and he said this should actually \nbe 2 buy-resales - one from Four Corners to ZP-26, and one from ZP-26 to \nNP-15. Let me know how that sounds to you, and I'll enter the deals.\n\nThanks,\nKate\n\n\n\nRhonda L Denton\n04/24/2001 03:23 PM\nTo: Kate Symes/PDX/ECT@ECT\ncc:  \n\nSubject: 581368\n\nShould this be NCPA, since we do not have transmission with them.  Or maybe \nit should be a buy/resale.  let me know.  Thanks."}
{"text": "Mark,  \n\nPlease describe in detail, the downstream capacity available to transport \nthis gas.  How does the CIG capacity being sold to Coastal impact this \npoint?  If you can make the case for this gas flowing without constraint, \nthen I see no problem in making a fixed price bid for the full volume.\n\nA rough sketch of the gas location and its downstream flow options would be \nnice. \n\nThanks,\n\nMike"}
{"text": "Start Date: 4/16/01; HourAhead hour: 17;  No ancillary schedules awarded.  \nVariances detected.\nVariances detected in Generation schedule.\n\n    LOG MESSAGES:\n\nPARSING FILE -->> O:\\Portland\\WestDesk\\California Scheduling\\ISO Final \nSchedules\\2001041617.txt\n\n---- Generation Schedule ----\n$$$ Variance found in table tblGEN_SCHEDULE.\n     Details: (Hour: 17 / Preferred:  45.00 / Final:  44.90)\n  TRANS_TYPE: FINAL\n  SC_ID: DELANO\n  MKT_TYPE: 2\n  TRANS_DATE: 4/16/01\n  UNIT_ID: PANDOL_6_UNIT"}
{"text": "TO:?????????????HAAS STUDENTS\n\nRE:?????????????ON-SITE TEXTBOOK BUYBACK & HAAS GEAR SALE\n????????????????WEDNESDAY, DECEMBER 13 THROUGH WEDNESDAY, DECEMBER 20\n????????????????**************************************\n????????????????ON-SITE SPRING 2001 TEXTBOOK, COURSE READER,\n????????????????HAAS GEAR AND SCHOOL SUPPLY SALES\n**********************************************************\nON-SITE BUYBACK OF USED TEXTBOOKS AND SALES OF HAAS GEAR\nBEGINS ON WEDNESDAY.? Cal Student Store Textbooks will buy back used \ntextbooks and sell HaasGear.\n????????DATES:??????????Wednesday, December 13 though Wednesday, December 20\n????????TIMES:??????????9 AM - 5PM\n????????PLACE:??????????\"Helzel Store\", F299 (next to Andersen\n????????????????????????????????Auditorium and Jimmy Beans Cafe)\n***********************************************\nON-SITE SPRING 2001 SALES? OF TEXTBOOKS, READERS, HAASGEAR & SUPPLIES\nDuring the first two weeks of classes, Cal Student Store will sell Haas \ntextbooks, course readers,\nHaasGear and school supplies.\n????????DATES:? ????????????????Tuesday, January 16 through Friday, January \n26 (M-F only).\n????????TIMES:??????????9AM - 5PM\n????????PLACE:??????????\"Helzel Store\",? F299 ????? ????\n? \nDiana L. Burke\nAdministrative Services Office\nSupervisor\nHAASGEAR Sales\nHaas School of Business\n545 Student Services Bldg., #1900\nBerkeley, CA? 94720-1900\nPhone: 510/643-8404\nFAX:???? 510/642-4700"}
{"text": "Attached is a summary of the conference call held between Enron, Citizens, and PP&L on October 18th.  Proposed procedures on how we will handle cuts from now on are also included.  Enron is making every effort available to ensure that PP&L receives 100% of the gas that they call on.  I feel that we need to formally agree to these procedures, either in the form of an amendment to the agreement or a formal letter signed by all parties.\n\nPlease let me know if you have any comments regarding these procedures and how you would like to proceed.\n\nThanks,\n\nKim Ward\nManager, West Gas Origination\n713-853-0685"}
{"text": "---------------------- Forwarded by Judy Hernandez/HOU/ECT on 08/14/2000 \n12:33 PM ---------------------------\n\n\nRegina Blackshear@ENRON\n08/14/2000 10:00 AM\nTo: [email protected], [email protected], Yolanda \nClay<[email protected]>, [email protected], Loneta \nEdison<[email protected]>, [email protected], Tammy Green \n<[email protected]>, [email protected], [email protected], \"R \nJordan\"<[email protected]>, \"BENEDICT \nPETERS\"<[email protected]>, Angela Barnett/HOU/ECT@ECT, Warren \nPerry/Corp/Enron@Enron, Shirlet Williams/HOU/EES@EES, Amber \nLimas/HOU/EES@EES, Pamela Mitchell/HOU/ECT@ECT, Judy Hernandez/HOU/ECT@ECT, \nSandra R McNichols/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bernice Rodriguez/HOU/ECT@ECT, Derick \nJones/Corp/Enron@Enron, Tharsilla Broussard/HR/Corp/Enron@ENRON\ncc:  \nSubject: FW: You will get a very pleasant surprise.\n\nThis is a very nice story.  You never know when Jesus will visit you so \nalways be willing to give.  I don't consider this to be a chain letter, I \njust like the story and I thought you would too.\n\n\nRuth went to her mail box and there was only one letter.  She picked it\nup and looked at it before opening, but then  she looked at the envelope\nagain. There was no stamp, no postmark, only her name and address.  She\nread the letter:\n\nDear Ruth:\n\nI'm going to be in your neighborhood Saturday afternoon and I would like\nto visit.\n\nLove Always,\nJesus\n\nHer hands were shaking as she placed the letter on the table.   \"Why\nwould the Lord want to visit me?   I'm nobody special.  I don't have\nanything to offer.\"   With that thought,  Ruth remembered her empty\nkitchen cabinets. \"Oh my  goodness,  I really don't have anything to\noffer.  I'll have to run down  to the store and buy something for\ndinner.\"  She reached for her purse and counted out it's contents.\nFive dollars and forty cents. \"Well, I can get some bread and cold cuts,\nat least.\"   She threw on her coat and hurried out the door. A loaf of\nfrench bread, a half-pound of sliced turkey, and a carton of\nmilk...leaving Ruth with grand total of twelve cents to last her until\nMonday.   Nonetheless, she felt good as she headed home, her meager\nofferings tucked under her arm.\"Hey lady, can you help us, lady?\"  Ruth\nhad been so absorbed in her dinner plans, she hadn't even noticed two\nfigures huddled in the alleyway. A man and a woman, both of them dressed\nin little more than rags.   \"Look lady, I ain't got a job, ya know, and\nmy wife and I have been living  out here  on the street, and, well, now\nit's getting cold and  we're getting kinda hungry and, well, if you\ncould help us, lady, we'd really appreciate it.\" Ruth looked at them\nboth.  They were dirty, they smelled bad and frankly, she was certain\nthat they could get some kind of work if they really wanted to.  \"Sir,\nI'd like to help  you, but I'm a poor woman myself.  All I have is a few\ncold cuts  and  some  bread, and I'm having an important guest for\ndinner  tonight  and  I was planning on serving that to Him.\" \"Yeah,\nwell, okay lady, I understand.  Thanks anyway.\"  The man put his arm\naround the woman's shoulders,  turned and  he headed back into the\nalley.  As she watched them leave, Ruth felt a familiar twinge in her\nheart.  \"Sir, wait!\"   The couple stopped and turned as she ran down the\nalley after them.  \"Look, why don't you take this food.  I'll figure out\nsomething  else to serve my  guest.\"  She handed the man her grocery bag\n\"Thank you lady. Thank you very much!\"  \"Yes, thank you!\" It was the\nman's wife, and Ruth could see now that she  was shivering. \"You know,\nI've got another coat at home.  Here, why don't you take this one.\"\nRuth unbuttoned her jacket and slipped it over the woman's shoulders.\nThen smiling, she turned and walked back to the street...without her\ncoat and with nothing to serve her guest.\n\n\"Thank you lady! Thank you very much!\"\n\nRuth was chilled by the time she reached her front door, and worried\ntoo. The Lord was coming to visit and she didn't have anything to offer\nHim.  She fumbled through her purse for the door key.   But as she did,\nshe noticed another envelope in her mailbox.  \"That's odd.  The mailman\ndoesn't usually come twice in one day.\"   She took the envelope out of\nthe box and opened it.\n\nDear Ruth:\n\nIt was so good to see you again.  Thank you for  the lovely meal. And\nthank you, too, for the beautiful coat.\n\nLove Always,\nJesus\n\nThe air was still cold, but even without her coat, Ruth no  longer\nnoticed.\n\nIf you love Jesus, send this to ten people.   Do not keep this message.\n\nThe mantra must leave your hands within 96  hours. You will get a very\npleasant surprise."}
{"text": "Return-Path: <[email protected]>\nReceived: from  rly-yb03.mx.aol.com (rly-yb03.mail.aol.com [172.18.146.3]) by \nair-yb05.mail.aol.com (v74.17) with ESMTP; Fri, 16 Jun 2000 11:20:59 -0400\nReceived: from  postmaster.enron.com (outbound5.enron.com [192.152.140.9]) by \nrly-yb03.mx.aol.com (v74.17) with ESMTP; Fri, 16 Jun 2000 11:20:27 -0400\nReceived: from mailman.enron.com (mailman.enron.com [192.168.189.66]) by \npostmaster.enron.com (8.8.8/8.8.8/postmaster-1.00) with ESMTP id KAA29860 for \n<[email protected]>; Fri, 16 Jun 2000 10:20:27 -0500 (CDT)\nReceived: from dserv1.ect.enron.com (dserv1.ect.enron.com [172.16.1.37]) by \nmailman.enron.com (8.10.1/8.10.1/corp-1.05) with ESMTP id e5GFHf521633 for \n<[email protected]>; Fri, 16 Jun 2000 10:17:41 -0500 (CDT)\nReceived: from notes.ect.enron.com (ecthou_gt2.corp.enron.com [172.16.4.33]) \nby dserv1.ect.enron.com (8.8.8/8.8.8) with SMTP id KAA11437 for \n<[email protected]>; Fri, 16 Jun 2000 10:18:01 -0500 (CDT)\nReceived: by notes.ect.enron.com(Lotus SMTP MTA v4.6.5  (863.2 5-20-1999))  \nid 86256900.00540A81 ; Fri, 16 Jun 2000 10:17:57 -0500\nX-Lotus-FromDomain: ECT\nFrom: \"Vince J Kaminski\" <[email protected]>\nTo: [email protected]\nMessage-ID: <[email protected]>\nDate: Fri, 16 Jun 2000 10:17:59 -0500\nSubject: Australian Energy Risk 2000\nMime-Version: 1.0\nContent-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii\nContent-Disposition: inline\nX-Mailer: Unknown\n\n\n\n\n---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 06/16/2000 \n10:21\nAM ---------------------------\n\n\n\"Lucie Deathridge\" <[email protected]> on 06/09/2000 12:52:54 PM\n\nPlease respond to \"Lucie Deathridge\" <[email protected]>\n\nTo:   <[email protected]>\ncc:\nSubject:  Australian Energy Risk 2000\n\n\n\n\n\nAs Australian Energy Risk 2000 is approaching. I am emailing you with regards\nto your presentation. The deadline date is Monday 12 June. If this is going to\nbe a problem please let me know I will be out of the office from Monday 12,\nuntil Monday 19 June, on which date I will be putting the presentation pack\ntogether to send to the printers. If your presentation is complete could you\nplease email it to [email protected] as a  powerpoint file ASAP.\n\nIf you have any problems in doing this please do not hesitate to contact me  \nby\nemail or on (020) 7484 9867. I will reply to any queries when I return.\n\nRegards\nLucie Deathridge\nConference Co-ordinator\nRisk  Publications\n\nTel: (+44) (020) 7484 9867\nhttp://www.riskpublications.com"}
{"text": "In light of recent events, effective IMMEDIATELY, all usage of the Corporate American Express card is restricted to transactions (approved by your management) for business travel at airline, hotel, car rental and restaurant establishments. Transactions attempted at other establishments will be denied at the point of sale.\n\nEffective Friday, December 7th, ALL charge privileges on ALL Corporate American Express Corporate Cards will be suspended indefinitely. There will be NO charge activity allowed on any Card after close of business on Friday, December 7, 2001.\n\nEnron and each cardholder maintain joint liability on all authorized business related charges on the Corporate American Express card. Each individual cardholder maintains sole liability for non-business related charges.\n\nIt is highly recommended that all outstanding and approved business expenses incurred on the American Express Corporate Card be submitted through XMS for reimbursement as soon as incurred.\n\nWe are continuously working on solutions to facilitate business travel processes. If you have an immediate need or solution, please let us know.\n\nFor assistance, please contact:\n\nTracy Ramsey, Director Global Travel Services                                                                                                                                                                     (713) 646-8311, [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>\n\nEnron Travel Management                                                                                                                                                                                                    (713) 345-6252, enron [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>."}
{"text": "Looks like I will have to miss Jazz Fest next year . I may be incarcerated.\n\nJilly\n----- Original Message -----\nFrom: <[email protected]>\nTo: Mike Jillard <[email protected]>\nSent: Monday, May 14, 2001 10:45 AM\nSubject: heard your ship came in\n\n\n> Sounds like the coast guard found your boat and took your stash.  Sorry to\n> hear that.\n> PL\n> http://www.cnn.com/2001/US/05/14/cocaine.seizure.txt/index.html\n>"}
{"text": "---------------------- Forwarded by Eric Bass/HOU/ECT on 03/13/2001 01:12 PM \n---------------------------\n   \n\t\n\t\n\tFrom:  Larry Joe Hunter                           03/13/2001 12:49 PM\n\t\n\nTo: Eric Bass/HOU/ECT@ECT\ncc: Julie Brewer/NA/Enron@Enron, Janie Aguayo/HOU/ECT@ECT \nSubject: rebooks 3/12\n\nPlease rebook QW4526 to CORALENEHOL\n\nThanks,\nJoe"}
{"text": "Hi! My fax number is (55-11) 5507-3626\n\n\n\n\nSara Shackleton@ECT\n07/12/99 08:03 PM\nTo: Andrea Bertone/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT\ncc:  \n\nSubject: update of Brazilian regulations\n\nHello!  Please send me your fax number.  I have a list of \"Final and Proposed \nRegulations\" which needs to be updated.  I would like to fax you the list.  \nThanks.  Sara"}
{"text": "Thanks for the slides.  There really is nothing new under the sun.  The key \nis to identify the source of competitive advantage.  To my mind it's the same \nline of thought that leads us to see EOL as sustainable, but neutral B2B \nmarketplaces as temporary.  Our only competitive advantage is that we are the \nlargest principal member of the potential club, making our participation most \ncritical.  Given this, our timing and positioning relative to potentially \njoining others may be the single most important strategic decision we make.  \nI would enjoy hearing your thoughts on any other elements of competitve \nadvantage that we could leverage, particularly those elements that are most \nsustainable.\n\n\n\n\nMary Solmonson@ECT\n12/13/2000 04:59 PM\nTo: Thomas D Gros/NA/Enron@Enron\ncc: Sally Beck/HOU/ECT@ECT, James Whitehead/Corp/Enron@ENRON \n\nSubject: Data Exchange Strategy\n\nI just saw this presentation on EnVera and couldn't help but think this is \nthe concept you were promoting yesterday as a data hub/exchange.  Seems like \nthat is the EnVera strategy as well."}
{"text": "TCO will allow this burn rate until further notice for Hopewell. This \ninformation has been give to Chuck Barnes at Hopewell Plant and to Cullen \nHarper. \n\n12 midnight to 10 am = 1200 dkt /hour 10 x 1200  = 12,000\n10 am to 12 noon = 2500 dkt/hour 2 x 2500  = 5,000\n12 noon to midnight = 3500 dkt/hour 12 x 3500  = 42,000\n\nTotal Burn      = 59,000\n\nNote, this is max that hopewell can do... not what they have ordered for each \nday. \n\nNow we need to find gas and transport to get it there.\n\nThanks."}
{"text": "The following expense report is ready for approval:\n\nEmployee Name: Grace L. Blair\nStatus last changed by: Ava L. Garcia\nExpense Report Name: Sodexho Marriott @ Enron\nReport Total: $518.52\nAmount Due Employee: $518.52\n\n\nTo approve this expense report, click on the following link for Concur Expense.\nhttp://expensexms.enron.com"}
{"text": "We met with Gov Davis on Thursday evening in LA.  In attendance were Ken Lay, \nthe Governor, the Governor's staff director (Kari Dohn) and myself.  The gov. \nspent over an hour and a half with us covering our suggestions and his \nideas.  He would like some additional thoughts from us by Tuesday of next \nweek as he prepares his state of the state address for the following Monday.  \nAttached to the end of this memo is a list of solutions we proposed (based on \nmy discussions with several of you) as well as some background materials Jeff \nDasovich and I prepared.  Below are my notes from the meeting regarding our \nproposals, the governor's ideas, as well as my overview of the situation \nbased on the governor's comments:\n\nOverview:   We made great progress in both ensuring that he understands that \nwe are different from the generators and in opening a channel for ongoing \ncommunication with his administration. The gov does not want the utilities to \ngo bankrupt and seems predisposed to both rate relief (more modest than what \nthe utilities are looking for) and credit guarantees.  His staff has more \nwork to do on the latter, but he was clearly intrigued with the idea.  He \ntalked mainly in terms of raising rates but not uncapping them at the retail \nlevel.  He also wants to use what generation he has control over for the \nbenefit of California consumers, including utility-owned generation (which he \nwould dedicate to consumers on a cost-plus basis) and excess muni power \n(which he estimates at 3000MW).  He foresees a mix of market oriented \nsolutions as well as interventionist solutions which will allow him to fix \nthe problem by '02 and provide some political cover.\nOur proposals:  I have attached the outline we put in front of him (it also \nincluded the forward price information several of you provided).  He seemed \ninterested in 1) the buy down of significant demand, 2) the state setting a \ngoal of x000 MW of new generation by a date certain, 3) getting the utilities \nto gradually buy more power forward and 4) setting up a group of rate \nanalysts and other \"nonadvocates\" to develop solutions to a number of issues \nincluding designing the portfolio and forward purchase terms for utilities.  \nHe was also quite interested in examining the incentives surrounding LDC gas \npurchases.   As already mentioned, he was also favorably disposed to finding \nsome state sponsored credit support for the utilities.\nHis ideas:  The gov read from a list of ideas some of which were obviously \nunder serious consideration and some of which were mere \"brainstorming\".  \nSome of these ideas would require legislative action.\nState may build (or make build/transfer arrangements) a \"couple\" of \ngeneration plants.  The gov feels strongly that he has to show consumers that \nthey are getting something in return for bearing some rate increases.  This \nwas a frequently recurring theme.\nUtilities would sell the output from generation they still own on a cost-plus \nbasis to consumers.\nMunicipal utilties would be required to sell their excess generation in \nCalifornia.\nState universities (including UC/CSU and the community colleges) would more \nwidely deploy distributed generation.\nExpand in-state gas production.\nTake state lands gas royalties in kind.\nnegotiate directly with tribes and state governments in the west for \naddtional gas supplies.\nEmpower an existing state agency to approve/coordinate power plant \nmaintenance schedules to avoid having too much generation out of service at \nany one time.\nCondition emissions offsets on commitments to sell power longer term in state.\nEither eliminate the ISO or sharply curtail its function -- he wants to hear \nmore about how Nordpool works(Jeff- someone in Schroeder's group should be \nable to help out here).\nWants to condition new generation on a commitment to sell in state.  We made \nsome headway with the idea that he could instead require utilities to buy \nsome portion of their forward requirements from new in-state generation \nthereby accomplishing the same thing without using a command and control \napproach with generators.\nSecuritize uncollected power purchase costs.\nTo dos: (Jeff, again I'd like to prevail on you to assemble the group's \nthoughts and get them to Kari)\nHe wants to see 5 year fixed power prices for peak/ off-peak and baseload -- \nnot just the 5 one year strips.\nHe wants comments on his proposals by Tuesday.\nHe would like thoughts on how to pitch what consumers are getting out of the \ndeal.\nHe wants to assemble a group of energy gurus to help sort through some of the \nforward contracting issues.\nThanks to everyone for their help.  We made some progress today."}
{"text": "Frank\n\nPlease find our approvals from last week consolidated on the attached file.  \nThis should be helpful in reviewing the activity.\n\n\n \n\n\nRegards\nMolly"}
{"text": "look at sitara 588471;588452;588605;596991"}
{"text": "Here's set of any master agreements I need ASAP.  \n\nI didn't mention it on the earlier ones, but for all of these, if any of the agreements have been amended, I will need any amendments, as well as any guarantees.  Much thanks!\n -----Original Message-----\nFrom: \tWilliams, Jason R (Credit)  \nSent:\tMonday, October 29, 2001 3:56 PM\nTo:\tJones, Tana\nSubject:\tHess relationship\n\nTana -\n\nWe need to pull together all of the contracts with the following:\n\n\tAmerada Hess Corporation\n\tHess Energy Services Company, LLC\n\tHess Energy Trading Company (UK) Limited\n\tHess Energy Trading Company LLC\n\n\nWe need to pull together a Master Netting agreement with them ASAP.  Please call me (53923) with any questions.\n\n\nThanks,\n\nJRW"}
{"text": "Brian,  Mark forward the executed docs. to me.  The Trailblazer Assignment \nwas not included.  I have attached the assignment in case you don't have the \none I forwarded earlier.  Please execute and return.   Also the Amended and \nRestated Transaction No. 2 was initialled, but was not executed.  I am \nforwarding those back to you for execution.  Thanks for your cooperation."}
{"text": "Alan\n\nRussell says he would like to go through his recorded conversations with \nHyundai to refresh his memory. He has asked to the meeting with WFW to be on \nTuesday (5 Oct). I will try to schedule Suzanne's and Neale's attendance for \nTuesday, and update you after the meeting.\n\nMatt\n\n\n\n\n\nAlan Aronowitz\n09/30/99 10:11 PM\nTo: Matthias Lee/SIN/ECT@ECT\ncc: Anita Fam/SIN/ECT@ECT, Angeline Poon/SIN/ECT@ECT, Richard B \nSanders/HOU/ECT@ECT \n\nSubject: Re: \"PACIFIC VALOUR\"  \n\nMatt:\n\nPlease advise as to any update after Neale/Suzanne soeak with Russell and \nSheila reagrding the conversations with Hyundai. Thanks.\n\n\n\nMatthias Lee\n09/29/99 08:23 PM\nTo: Alan Aronowitz/HOU/ECT@ECT, Anita Fam/SIN/ECT@ECT\ncc: Angeline Poon/SIN/ECT@ECT \nSubject: \"PACIFIC VALOUR\"\n\nFYI.\n\nMatt\n---------------------- Forwarded by Matthias Lee/SIN/ECT on 09/30/99 09:15 AM \n---------------------------\n\n\[email protected] on 09/29/99 06:57:30 PM\nTo: Matthias Lee/SIN/ECT@ECT\ncc: [email protected], [email protected] \n\nSubject: \"PACIFIC VALOUR\"\n\n\n\nDear Matt\n\nI refer to our discussions today.  We have reviewed the transcript between\nRussell and Hyundai, together with the cited case which neatly summarises many\nof the principles of repudiation and affirmation.\n\nOn its own, we do not consider that the transcript changes the position.  (We\nare assuming that this conversation was the last before parties began to\ncommunicate only in writing).  Although we agree that Hyundai's position is\nsomewhat equivocal in this fax, it was superceded by later written\ncorrespondence which gives a timeframe for Hyundai to affirm the contract or\naccept Enron's breach.  The later responses from Hyundai seems clear in its\nacceptance of repudiation.\n\nHowever, both Neale and I think it might be a good idea if we speak with \nRussell\nand Sheila together with you (perhaps with a view to taking short statements\nfrom them).  If both their views are that Hyundai were equivocal in various\nconversations and given Hyundai's earlier rather relaxed attitude to vessel\nnomination, there may be some scope for constructing a stronger case that they\nelected to affirm the contract.\n\nIf this suits, both Neale and I would be free Friday morning or late \nafternoon.\n\nBest regards\n\nSuzanne"}
{"text": "Susan/Nancy,\n\nPlease move the following books from J_ARNOLD to M_MAGGI portfolio:\n\n NG-ERMS-XL-PRC\n NG-EXOTIC-PRC\n\nThanks,\nRobin"}
{"text": "fyi\n---------------------- Forwarded by Marty Sunde/HOU/EES on 12/28/2000 11:24 \nAM ---------------------------\n\n\nScott Stoness\n12/28/2000 11:23 AM\nTo: Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron, Roger Yang/SFO/EES@EES\ncc: Marty Sunde/HOU/EES@EES \nSubject: Argument to Davis re Utilities are not short of Assets\n\nI understand from our conversation today that Lay is going to give the \nfollowing theme to Davis:\nNeed thoughful time to consider value of assets, ongoing structure etc.\nCA needs generation \nCA needs conservation\n\nAs I mentioned in the meeting today: I would add:\nUtility solvency problems are not as pressing as they make them out to be.  \nAssuming that they  own 10,000 MW of generation with book costs of $50/MWh.  \nAssuming that the 2001 power costs are $150/MWh alone, would allow an \nincrease in the value of these assets by $13billion dollars.      The \ngovernment could offer to take over the assets today for about $22b (2001, \n2002, and original estimated value), leaving the utilities with enough money \nto pay for existing debt plus whatever debt they are likely to incurr to the \nend of 2001.  They are trying to steal this value by threatening bancruptcy."}
{"text": "Robert Bradley asked me to forward this presentation to you.\n\n\nThanks \nKatrina B."}
{"text": "Me bored??  I think you must be more bored than me to talk about ear \ncleaning.  There's this new person that sits down the row from me and she \nbaby talks...what's up with that!  It's so irritating.  Well now that I've \ngossipped about someone 10ft from me I better send this email before someone \nwalks by and reads it.  I think I'll skip the run this week.  \n\nRR"}
{"text": "Yesterday Jeff Fawcett, Lee Ferrell and I met with Dynegy marketing and \nlegal/regulatory representatives regarding TW Transport Options.  Overall the \nmeeting was very positive.  We had nothing but encouraging remarks from the \nmarketing representatives.  However, the regulatory people (Sarah Tomalty, Ed \nRoss) had a couple of issues.  The biggest issue is a marketing affiliate \nconcern.  Apparently Dynegy is on a crusade at FERC to place further limits \non deals pipelines can do with their marketing affiliates.  They have run \ninto situations in which pipelines (examples:  Koch, El Paso) have blatantly \nfavored their marketing affiliates to the extent that Dynegy cannot even do \ndeals with them.  (In fact, one of the problems with Koch has been Koch's \nprice option deals with its affiliate.)  The perception is that the \naffiliates, by using \"funny money,\" can always make themselves the highest \nbidder, with a net benefit to the entire organization (pipeline + \naffiliate).  The remedy Dynegy is proposing is to require a marketing \naffiliate, if it is the highest bidder, to credit back the difference between \nthe price it pays and the price offered by the next highest bidder.  The \npresumption is that the affiliate has an unfair advantage because it is able \nto pay above market value in order to get the capacity.   Dynegy's proposal \nwould encourage affiliates to pay \"real\" dollars.  \n\nWhile it emphasized its belief that TW does not favor its marketing \naffiliates, Dynegy would like for us to include in our filing some limitation \non options transactions with marketing affiliates.   It is likely that other \npipelines will file for the ability to sell options once FERC approves our \nfiling, and Dynegy would like for this type of protection to be part of the \nprecedent set by our filing.  Ed hinted that FERC may be considering a \ndivestiture requirement for marketing affiliates, and that pipelines can \navoid this extreme result by voluntarily limiting their transactions with \naffiliates.  Shelley, I know you've discussed this issue with Ed already and \nour reactions were the same.  Basically we politely told Dynegy that we don't \nbelieve we're part of the problem and that we are therefore not inclined to \nunnecessarily disadvantage our company by further limiting ENA's ability to \ndo business with TW.   We can probably expect an intervention with comments \nor a limited protest addressing the issue.\n\nThe other regulatory question was whether we intend to file each option deal \nas a negotiated rate.  My analysis of this issue is that since we're \nproposing the option fee as part of the transport rate, options would always \nbe a type of negotiated rate and would need to be filed.  If you think this \nis not the right answer, please let me know because we need to decide it \nbefore we file the tariff sheets.  Sarah's question seemed to be more one of \ncuriosity rather than a basis for protest.\n\nLike the Indicated Shippers, Dynegy appeared interested in an all-customer \nmeeting to discuss the service.  Jeff and the rest of the commercial group \nare looking further into whether and when we would have such a meeting. \n\nIf you have any questions or concerns please let me know."}
{"text": "Yes...except I'm sure it will take six more months before they have all of the information changed in the system.\n\n -----Original Message-----\nFrom: \tLaGesse, Denise  \nSent:\tThursday, May 10, 2001 2:10 PM\nTo:\tScott, Susan M.\nSubject:\tRE: diverseworks fax\n\nSorry.  I knew that!  I bet you'll be glad when she gets married this month and changes her name!\n\n -----Original Message-----\nFrom: \tScott, Susan M.  \nSent:\tThursday, May 10, 2001 2:07 PM\nTo:\tLaGesse, Denise\nCc:\tScott, Susan\nSubject:\tRE: diverseworks fax\n\nI think this was intended for the other Susan Scott.\n\nThanks\n\n -----Original Message-----\nFrom: \tLaGesse, Denise  \nSent:\tThursday, May 10, 2001 2:06 PM\nTo:\tScott, Susan M.\nSubject:\tdiverseworks fax\n\nYou received a fax up here from Sara Kellner at Diverseworks.  It's at my desk.  Please let them know your new fax number.  Thanks.\n\nDenise LaGesse\nLegal Department\nP.O. Box 1188 (77251-1188)\n1400 Smith Street, Room EB4784\nHouston, Texas 77002\nph. 713-853-6704\nfax 713-853-5425\[email protected]"}
{"text": "please print\n----- Forwarded by Steven J Kean/NA/Enron on 10/16/2000 10:24 AM -----\n\n\tRex Rogers\n\t10/12/2000 11:28 AM\n\t\t \n\t\t To: James M Bannantine/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Cliff \nBaxter/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sanjay Bhatnagar/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, \nRick Buy/HOU/ECT@ECT, Richard Causey/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Diomedes \nChristodoulou/SA/Enron@Enron, David W Delainey/HOU/ECT@ECT, James \nDerrick/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Andrew S Fastow/HOU/ECT@ECT, [email protected], \nMark Frevert/NA/Enron@Enron, Ben F Glisan/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kevin Hannon/Enron \nCommunications@Enron Communications, David \nHaug/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Stanley Horton/Corp/Enron@Enron, \nLarry L Izzo/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Steven J \nKean/NA/Enron@Enron, Mark Koenig/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Kenneth \nLay/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Mike McConnell/HOU/ECT@ECT, Rebecca \nMcDonald/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Jeffrey McMahon/HOU/ECT@ECT, J \nMark Metts/NA/Enron@Enron, Cindy Olson/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Lou L \nPai/HOU/EES@EES, Ken Rice/Enron Communications@Enron Communications, Jeffrey \nSherrick/Corp/Enron@ENRON, John Sherriff/LON/ECT@ECT, Jeff \nSkilling/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Joseph W \nSutton/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Greg Whalley/HOU/ECT@ECT, Thomas \nE White/HOU/EES@EES, Brenda Castillo/NA/Enron@Enron, Marcia \nManarin/SA/Enron@Enron, Susan Skarness/HOU/ECT@ECT, Stacy \nGuidroz/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Beena \nPradhan/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Karen K Heathman/HOU/ECT@ECT, \nSharron Westbrook/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Kay Chapman/HOU/ECT@ECT, Molly \nBobrow/NA/Enron@Enron, Rosane Fabozzi/SA/Enron@Enron, Stephanie \nHarris/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Bridget Maronge/HOU/ECT@ECT, [email protected], \nNicki Daw/NA/Enron@Enron, Inez Dauterive/HOU/ECT@ECT, Carol Ann Brown/Enron \nCommunications@Enron Communications, Elaine \nRodriguez/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Cindy Stark/Corp/Enron@ENRON, \nMary E Garza/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Maureen \nMcVicker/NA/Enron@Enron, Joannie Williamson/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Rosalee \nFleming/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Vanessa Groscrand/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Tori L \nWells/HOU/ECT@ECT, Cathy Phillips/HOU/ECT@ECT, Loretta \nBrelsford/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Sue Ford/HOU/ECT@ECT, Dolores \nFisher/NA/Enron@Enron, Karen Owens/HOU/EES@EES, Dorothy Dalton/Enron \nCommunications@Enron Communications, Mercedes Estrada/Enron \nCommunications@Enron Communications, Christina Grow/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Lauren \nUrquhart/LON/ECT@ECT, Sherri Sera/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Katherine \nBrown/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Pam Benson/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Jana \nMills/HOU/ECT@ECT, Liz M Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT, Judy G Smith/HOU/EES@EES, Bobbie \nPower/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Suzanne Danz/Corp/Enron@ENRON\n\t\t cc: \n\t\t Subject: EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE MEETING - MONDAY, OCTOBER 16:  NEW S.E.C. RULES \nRELATING TO TRANSACTIONS IN ENRON CORP. COMMON STOCK\n\nI have been asked to make a brief presentation at next Monday\u0001,s Executive \nCommittee meeting addressing a new S.E.C. insider trading rule.  Although the \nnew rule may increase exposure to liability for insider trading, certain \nprovisions of the new rule may actually provide for greater flexibility in \nthe timing of your personal trades in Enron Corp. common stock.  Attached is \na short memo addressing our current Company procedures and policies for \ntrading, the new S.E.C. rule, and some suggestions for alternatives that you \nmay want to consider concerning your personal trades in Enron Corp. common \nstock.  If anyone wants to discuss the new rule and the trading alternatives \nprovided by the new rule before next week\u0001,s meeting, please don\u0001,t hesitate to \ngive me a call at 713-853-3069.  Thank you.\n\nAttachments"}
{"text": "The Enron Oral History Project Continues...\n\n\"Using History to Help Enron Become the World's Leading Company\"\n\nHow can an understanding of strategic choices, regulatory change and corporate culture help Enron achieve its vision?\n\nSpeaker:\nJoseph Pratt, Cullen Professor of History and Business, University of Houston\nand\n Co-Director, Enron Oral History Project\n\nThursday, June 7\n11:30 a.m. to 12:30 p.m.\nEB 5C2\n\nTo Make a Reservation, Call 3-1941 and Select Option 1\n\nLunch will not be provided, but you are welcome to bring your own.\n\nPlease inform us ahead of time if you need special accommodations to participate in this meeting.  Call 3-9390."}
{"text": "request_number:  PS-BPA 116 and 118\nfirstname:  Steve\nlastname:  Marshall\ne-mail:  [email protected]\ndirected_to:  Peter J. Burger - LP-7\nOffice of General Counsel\nBonneville Power Administration\nP.O. Box 3261\nPortland, Oregon  97208-3621\nexhibit_wp-02-e-:  BPA-78\npage_numbers:  1-8\nrequest_text:  PS-BPA:116, Page 3, Lines 1-3:  Beginning at line 1 the \nwitnesses state \u0001&While SUB\u0001,s use of a straight-line extrapolation of REP \nvalues and market prices is simple to use, it is not necessarily accurate.\u00018  \nPlease describe the conditions under which the extrapolation would not be \naccurate.\n\nPS-BPA:118, Page 3, Lines 4-8:  Beginning at line 4 the witnesses state \n\u0001&While SUB correctly notes that the relative value of BPA\u0001,s below-market \npower increases as the difference between BPA-s price and the market price \nincreases, this is true for all power sold by BPA, whether it is the \napproximately 5,800 average megawatts (aMW) being sold to public body \ncustomers or the 1,000 aMW power portion of the IOUs\u0001, REP settlements.\u00018  Has \nBPA calculated the value of BPA\u0001,s below market power for the approximately \n5,800 average megawatts (aMW) being sold to public body customers?  If so, \nplease provide the value or values, and the calculations supporting the value \nor values.\n\ncontact_name:  Steve Marshall\ncontact_address:  Perkins Coie\nOne Bellevue Center, Suite 1800\n411 - 108th Avenue N.E.\nBellevue, WA  98004\ncontact_phone:  425-453-7314\ncontact_email:  [email protected]\ncontact_fax:  425-453-7350\ndelivery_instructions:  Please mail hard coies of data responses to Steve \nMarshall at the address above\n\nThe following information is from the web server:\n1.  Logon: IUSR_GRANITE\n2.  Remote Host:  seairon.perkinscoie.com\n3.  Remote IP Address:  38.169.150.2\n4.  Form URL:  \nhttps://secure.bpa.gov/power/secure/psp/ratecase/discovery/wp_02_request.html\n5.  Browser Client:  Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 5.01; Windows NT)"}
{"text": "As you know, we are continuously updating the Foreign & Domestic Counsel \ndatabase so that it can be maintained in the most accurate form; therefore, \nany new information you may have regarding outside counsel firms that have \nbeen interviewed and/or retained in the past 12 months would be greatly \nappreciated.  Also, if you have any updates to the existing database entries \nwe would also like to hear from you. \n\nPlease take the time to help us update this database so it can be a valuable \ntool for all of us!  Each one of us has full access to the database via your \nLotus Notes application; however, if your icon has disappeared from your \ndesktop, click here to add it back on to your desktop >>>>>\n\nPlease provide any new information and/or updates either to Nony Flores or \nBecky Spencer. \n\nThank you for your attention to this matter."}
{"text": "Oops - that was supposed to be AT&T - Lucent is the one that lasts forever \nand deals with the Utility Solutions business.\n---------------------- Forwarded by Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT on 02/22/2000 04:10 \nPM ---------------------------\nTo: Bryan Seyfried/LON/ECT@ECT\ncc:  \nSubject: Re: Credit Derivatives Reference Entities  \n\nI have read the Lucent CA and it is OK to go ahead and keep them on the list \n- the CA seems to cover a relatively small transaction and expires on March \n25 anyway.\n\nWe are in the process of pulling the CA's for Dow, DuPont, GE, IMC, 3M, \nPitney Bowes, Praxair and Sprint."}
{"text": "Regards,\nbd"}
{"text": "Michelle,\n\nCarlos would be a great addition at ENA in any transactional capacity.  I \nworked with him extensively (actually, I hired him), and he is terrific.  \n\nThanks,\n\nKay\n---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 12/01/2000 09:37 \nAM ---------------------------\n\n\[email protected] on 12/01/2000 09:36:10 AM\nTo: [email protected]\ncc: [email protected] \n\nSubject: Opportunities at ENA\n\n\n\nMichelle, per my voicemail as I indicated, I am trying to pursue what\nopportunities may be available at EWS and both Julia Murray and Kay Mann\nrecommended that I contact you.  As background, I have been at EECC since\nOctober last year where I have focused on traditional EPC contracts and\njoint venture agreements with construction partners, cross-border financing\nagreements principally in Mexico and merger and acquisition/strategic\ninvestment transactions.  Before coming to Enron, I worked with the Houston\noffice of a New York based firm (Curtis, Mallet-Prevost, Colt & Mosle)\nwhere I focused mostly on transactions in Mexico since we represented Pemex\non their transactions involving long and short term oil supply agreements\nand CFE (Mexico's electricity commission) on its public bids for EPC and\nIPP projects.  Lastly, I started my legal career in 1994 at Patton Boggs in\nWashington, DC where I focused on general domestic corporate transactions\nsuch as establishing new business entities (ie, joint venture work,\npartnerships etc.), m & a work, and securities offerings.  Thanks for your\nconsideration and I look forward to talking with you when you return from\nvacation (my extension is 6-6127).\n\n(See attached file: EECC Resume.doc)\n\n - EECC Resume.doc"}
{"text": "eSource presents free Dow Jones Interactive training\n\nIntroduction to Dow Jones Interactive\nLearn about the content available through Dow Jones Interactive, and how to quickly put it to work for you. Including setting up your own custom clips and monitoring topics of interest to you.\n\nJune. 8\t  9:00 - 10:00 AM  EB560\n\nAdvanced\nLearn how to be more efficient on Dow Jones Interactive.  Put some power tools to work for you.  Learn how to employ codes, use search history, and customize.  Hands on time is provided.\n\n\t\t\tJune. 8\t  10:00 - 11:00 AM  EB560  \t\t\t\n  June. 8\t    11:00 - 12:00 AM  EB560 \n\nSeats fill up fast! To reserve a seat, please call Stephanie E. Taylor at 5-7928\n\n?\tNo Shows will be charged $50.00\n\nCheck the eSource training page at http://esource.enron.com/training.doc for additional training sessions and vendor presentations\n\nhttp://esource.enron.com\n\n\n\n\n\n<Embedded Picture (Metafile)>"}
{"text": "Rick and Elizabeth:\n\nBelow are my budget spreadsheet scenarios for EIM, EGM and ENW.  I have broken the budgets down by business unit.  Let me know if you have any questions.  \n\nLisa"}
{"text": "Please contact Craig Breslau.  I did not do any deals with Equistar, he did.\n\n\n\n\n   \n\t\n\t\n\tFrom:  Robert E Lloyd                           07/14/2000 09:29 AM\n\t\n\nTo: Lee L Papayoti/HOU/ECT@ECT\ncc: Anita Luong/HOU/ECT@ECT, Daren J Farmer/HOU/ECT@ECT \nSubject: Settelement Request for an Equistar \"Buyback\" ticket with ENA as \nShipper\n\n\n \n Daren wanted me to make this request to you for an Equistar Buyback Ticket \non Enron North America{ENA}.\n \n Equistar has nominated activity on ENA for June and July 2000 production.\n \n Settlement seems to think a Buyback ticket is necessary to properly account \nfor Equistar's monthly activity."}
{"text": "Please be advised that I will not be available for a conference call on the morning of November 2.  Thanks."}
{"text": "Start Date: 4/19/01; HourAhead hour: 6;  No ancillary schedules awarded.  No \nvariances detected.\n\n    LOG MESSAGES:\n\nPARSING FILE -->> O:\\Portland\\WestDesk\\California Scheduling\\ISO Final \nSchedules\\2001041906.txt\n\n---- Energy Import/Export Schedule ----\n*** Final schedule not found for preferred schedule.\n     Details:\n\n  TRANS_TYPE: FINAL\n  SC_ID: ECTRT\n  MKT_TYPE: 2\n  TRANS_DATE: 4/19/01\n  TIE_POINT: FCORNR_5_PSUEDO\n  INTERCHG_ID: EPMI_CISO_DESERT\n  ENGY_TYPE: FIRM"}
{"text": "It's no coinicidence that there're three I's in polItIcIan. What, you live\nin Sacramento now? When're we going to play?\n\n\n>From: [email protected]\n>To: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected],\n>[email protected]\n>Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2001 12:03:33 -0500\n>\n>Dan Walters: Davis plays in a virtual world while the energy reality\n>continues\n>\n>\n>(Published July 11, 2001)\n>\n>\n>California still has a very real and very severe energy crisis, to wit:\n>\n>\n>(Embedded image moved to file: pic08526.gif)The state is still running up\n>massive debts as it pays more for power than it can recover from ratepayers\n>and is having trouble borrowing billions of dollars to cover the debt.\n>\n>\n>(Embedded image moved to file: pic13357.gif)There is a strong possibility,\n>perhaps a probability, that when summer's heat truly descends, there will\n>be severe power blackouts as air conditioners demand more juice than\n>California can generate or buy.\n>\n>\n>(Embedded image moved to file: pic29337.gif)One major utility, Pacific Gas\n>and Electric, has filed for bankruptcy protection and a second, Southern\n>California Edison, is on the brink of joining it.\n>\n>\n>There is, however, a virtual energy crisis consisting of political spin,\n>media leaks and made-for-television buzz words -- and it is rapidly\n>becoming dominant, while the real situation fades into the background.\n>\n>\n>This week's comic opera proceedings before a Federal Energy Regulatory\n>Commission administrative judge in Washington had little to do with reality\n>and everything to do with the virtual version.\n>\n>\n>Gov. Gray Davis and other officials demanded $8.9 billion in refunds from\n>the generators and brokers who have been selling California power for the\n>past year, alleging that California is, in Davis' words, \"being gouged and\n>ripped off.\" But the number itself was more or less plucked out of thin air\n>-- an arithmetic exercise by the state power grid's traffic controller not\n>intended for a refund proceeding. And while Judge Curtis Wagner saw it as\n>unrealistic, Davis and other state officials insisted on its validity.\n>\n>\n>\"There are refunds due that total hundreds of millions of dollars and maybe\n>a billion dollars,\" Wagner said as a final negotiating session collapsed.\n>But that's a far cry from the $8.9 billion that Davis insists is due. \"If\n>you think California is going to settle for $1 billion in refunds, we will\n>see you in court,\" Davis said Tuesday.\n>\n>\n>Why is Davis being so belligerent? Because it's good politics. Ever since\n>he began berating out-of-state generators and accusing them of ripping off\n>California, Davis' approval ratings have been climbing. If he settled for\n>substantially less -- the power generators probably would agree to a couple\n>of billion dollars to rid themselves of the matter -- Davis would be\n>embarrassed. Politically, he's served by continuing to portray himself as\n>fighting for California and against the out-of-state generators.\n>\n>\n>That it's more political construct than reality is indicated by another\n>event this week, Davis' release of state power purchase data from early in\n>the year -- numbers that were made public only because a judge told him he\n>had to do it.\n>\n>\n>Davis and his minions have been accusing Texas-based generators and power\n>brokers of particularly egregious price gouging -- clearly playing on\n>Californians' instinctive mistrust of anything Texan and implying that\n>Texan George W. Bush is a co-conspirator. But the power purchase records --\n>which were released only to journalists willing to pay a stiff fee --\n>indicate that less than 10 percent of California's power purchase dollars\n>were going to Texas and the private sellers, in general, charged the state\n>less than such publicly owned utilities as the Los Angeles Department of\n>Water and Power.\n>\n>\n>The clearly adverse position being taken by FERC and the purchase data that\n>undercut his jingoistic sloganeering are not, however, deterring Davis from\n>continuing to operate, at least for public consumption, in the melodramatic\n>virtual world.\n>\n>\n>One cannot, however, ignore reality forever. The likelihood of a\n>pro-generator decision from FERC means that there will be no easy out for\n>Davis, or for his pending deal to prevent Southern California Edison from\n>slipping into bankruptcy court. The Legislature has refused to act on the\n>Edison rescue plan while it awaited an indication of whether the utility's\n>debts would be slimmed down by FERC.\n>\n>\n>This week's farcical events make it more likely that the Edison deal will\n>stall out permanently in the Legislature and its creditors will force the\n>utility into bankruptcy court later this summer. That's part of that nasty\n>old reality that cannot simply be wished away.\n>\n>\n>\n>The Bee's Dan Walters can be reached at (916) 321-1195 or\n>[email protected].\n>\n>\n>\n>\n>\n>\n><< pic08526.gif >>\n><< pic13357.gif >>\n><< pic29337.gif >>\n\n_________________________________________________________________\nGet your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com"}
{"text": "I'm OK with the language, but I want to make sure everyone is OK on the \nconcept.  When we left this (unless there have been subsequent conversations \nwith ECS that I wasn't a part of) we rejected Courtney's proposal to reduce \nour up front payment by $500,000.  He was to come back and propose a monthly \nquantity of gas to be paid over the term of the contract that would equate to \nthe $500,000, but I don't recall that we agreed to it.  Did we intend to \nleave the issue open for more horsetrading on the amount of a haircut ECS \nshould take or were we content to cover ECS at 100 cents on the dollar?  I am \nadvised that the Btu number in the letter would allow ECS to get the full \n$500,000 of up front value.  \n\nRod and Steve--this one is up to you and I think its totally a question of \nwhether we want to argue for some more $$ because I can't think of any other \nopen issue with ECS on this or any other deals that we might be able to \ntrade.    DF\n\n\n\n---------------------- Forwarded by Drew Fossum/ET&S/Enron on 05/11/2000 \n05:46 PM ---------------------------\n   \n\t\n\t\n\tFrom:  Susan Scott                           05/11/2000 03:37 PM\n\t\n\nTo: David Foti/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, James Centilli/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Steven \nHarris/ET&S/Enron@ENRON\ncc: Drew Fossum@ENRON \n\nSubject: Supplement to Gas Letter\n\nPlease take a look at this and let me know whether it accurately reflects \nwhat you discussed with ECS.  I'm reviewing it now and will let you know my \ncomments soon.  They want to sign this up tomorrow.  \n---------------------- Forwarded by Susan Scott/ET&S/Enron on 05/11/2000 \n03:34 PM ---------------------------\n\n\nGerald Nemec@ECT\n05/11/2000 03:35 PM\nTo: Susan Scott/ET&S/Enron@ENRON\ncc: Mark Knippa/HOU/ECT@ECT \n\nSubject: Supplement to Gas Letter\n\nSusan, Attached is the supplement to the gas letter which increases the \namount of gas TW delivers to the LLC. Please review and let me know."}
{"text": "Frank and I are staying at the Sheraton Belgravia which is about a 5 minute \nwalk to our office  -- it is small and quiet but nice rooms.  It is not on a \nmajor street like Picadilly or Park Lane, but we like it.  The rate is about \no190 a night\n\nWe had to move out of our flat on Monday, so are staying there until we \nleave.  Right now we are scheduled to fly out on Sat the 20th.\n\nAlso --- just a few notes on next week\n\nI am free Monday night if you would like to have dinner.  I know Frank and \nMaureen will be in Spain that night, they are back on Tuesday  \n\nAlso my going away party that Fernley is throwing is on Wed night -- so \nhopefully most people will drop by there.  It is just a pub thing near the \noffice, but hopefully you can make it!  I am sure there will be dinner or \nsomething afterwards.  \n\nTalk to you soon\n\nBeth\n\n\n   \n\tEnron Capital & Trade Resources Corp.\n\t\n\tFrom:  Sally Beck                           10/01/2001 22:58\n\t\n\nTo: Beth Apollo/LON/ECT@ECT\ncc:  \n\nSubject: London Hotel\n\nRight now, I am booked at 47 Park for next week.  I would love to be closer \nto the office, but I don't know if there is anything that makes sense.  Any \nsuggestions?  If not something close to the office, would you suggest another \nspot besides 47 Park?  \n\nI am committed to working on my agenda for next week before I leave the \noffice tonight.  I will e:mail you tomorrow to see if we can schedule a time \nto meet and hopefully a lunch or dinner, too.  --Sally"}
{"text": "Attached is a copy of a letter which we are sending to our Corporate, Enron \nNorth America Corp., Enron Energy Services Operations, Inc., Enron Broadband \nServices, Inc., Enron Net Works, LLC, Enron Engineering and Construction \nCompany, EGEP Services, Inc., Enron Transportation Services Company, Enron \nProperty Services Company, and Portland General Electric Company vendors as \nan additional step toward implementing our commitment to conduct our business \naffairs in accordance with the highest ethical standards.\n\nWe are sending you a copy of this letter so that you will be aware that your \nvendors will be receiving this letter and so that you will be reminded that \nEnron does enlist the cooperation of its vendors in adhering to its Business \nEthics Policy.  \n\nWe appreciate your efforts in contributing to an Enron work environment of \nwhich we can all be proud.\n\nSAMPLE\n\n\n\nNovember ____, 2000\n\n\n\nOFFICE OF THE CHAIRMAN\nrHeadquarter_Name_\nrAddress_\nrCity_ rState_  rZip_\n\nDear Sir or Madam :\n\n Enron Corp. (\u0001&Enron\u00018) believes in conducting its business affairs in \naccordance with the highest ethical standards.  Accordingly, employees of \nEnron and its subsidiaries are required to comply with Enron's Business \nEthics Policy which requires an employee to conduct himself/herself in a \nmanner which is not detrimental to the best interests of Enron and which does \nnot bring to the employee financial gain separately derived as a direct \nconsequence of his/her employment with Enron.  Further, Enron's Business \nEthics Policy states that no lavish entertainment or gifts are to be given or \nreceived by Enron employees for special position, price, or privilege.\n\n Not only is it incumbent upon our employees to follow this policy, but your \ncooperation in respecting these standards is also critical.  Enron expects \neach of its vendors and contractors to maintain adequate records that \ndocument its work relationship with Enron.  Enron's auditing department will \nroutinely conduct business ethics compliance audits of certain vendors and \ncontractors with whom Enron does business.  Your recognition of our ethical \nstandards allows Enron employees to work with you via arm's length \ntransactions and avoids potentially embarrassing and unethical situations.  \nIf you ever become aware of variances from our policy, please advise:\n\nJames V. Derrick, Jr.\nExecutive Vice President\nand General   Counsel\n(713) 853-5550\tor report\n\tanonymously\n\tto:\tEnron Compliance Officer\n\t\tCONFIDENTIAL\n\t\tConduct of Business Affairs\n\t\tPO Box 1188\n\t\tHouston, Texas   77251-1188\n\t\tor\n\t\tthe anonymous telephone line:\n\t\t(713) 853-7294\n\t\tor\n\t\tthe anonymous e-mail address:\n\t\[email protected]\n\n Your business relationship is important to us, and we look forward to \nmaintaining that relationship with you.\n\n         Very truly yours,"}
{"text": "Hi\n\nI've attached a couple of files summarizing our progress and current status on modeling the bid-ask spread.  The first summarizes characterization of the EOL Crude data and the second describes a bid-ask spread model based on options theory developed by Zimin (The figure from the paper is included separately).  I am now setting up an Excel spreadsheet to test this model with the EOL data.\n\nLet me know when you would like to meet to review this.\n\nThanks, Bob Lee                                \n\n  \n \n\n<Embedded >"}
{"text": "----- Forwarded by Susan J Mara/NA/Enron on 12/11/2000 11:18 AM -----\n\n\t\"Daniel Douglass\" <[email protected]>\n\t12/11/2000 10:36 AM\n\t\t \n\t\t To: <[email protected]>, <[email protected]>, <[email protected]>, \n<[email protected]>, <[email protected]>, <[email protected]>, \n<[email protected]>, <[email protected]>, \n<[email protected]>, <[email protected]>, <[email protected]>, \n<[email protected]>, <[email protected]>, <[email protected]>, \n<[email protected]>, <[email protected]>, \n<[email protected]>, <[email protected]>, \n<[email protected]>, <[email protected]>, \n<[email protected]>\n\t\t cc: \n\t\t Subject: FERC Order\n\nThe following is an excerpt from a FERC order issued on Friday:\n \n\"Ridgewood Power LLC (Ridgewood) filed comments suggesting that the shortage \nof supply could be remedied in part by relaxing the operating efficiency and \nother regulatory requirements pertaining to Qualifying Facilities (QFs).  \nRidgewood states that the total power production capacity of QFs in \nCalifornia is approximately 9,000 MWs, of which, between 4,000 and 5,500 MW \nare from qualifying cogeneration facilities (Cogeneration QFs) and the \nremainder from small power production facilities (Small Power QFs).  \nRidgewood states that the Cogeneration segment of the industry is \nunderutilized because of operating efficiency and other QF requirements.   \nWith a limited waiver or other equivalent relief, Ridgewood states that these \nunderutilized resources could help relieve current shortages during both peak \nand off-peak periods.  Ridgewood estimates that as much as 1,000 MWs would be \nimmediately available by allowing QFs to sell to the purchasing utility or \ninto the competitive market their \"above-baseline\" output for a limited time \nperiod.   Ridgewood suggests that any such sale would be made at market-based \nrates and would not be subject to the operating and efficiency \nstandards......... Section 292.205(c) of the Commission's regulations \nprovides that the Commission may waive any of its operating and efficiency \nstandards \"upon a showing that the facility will produce significant energy \nsavings\".   However, the Commission has exercised its waiver authority in a \nnumber of cases based on factors such as the limited durations of the \nrequested waiver, whether further waivers would be necessary, whether the \nrequest was intended to remedy specific problems associated with an \ninnovative technology, and whether granting waiver would fulfill PURPA's \ngoals.   We find that many of these same factors are present here.  \nConsistent with the goals of PURPA, we find that granting such waiver in this \ncircumstance will provide for increased efficiency in the use of the \nCogeneration facilities and improved reliability of electric service through \nincreasing the availability of needed capacity.  Therefore, we will grant \ntemporary waiver of the operating and efficiency standards to Cogeneration \nQFs for sales into California, effective as of the date of this order.  We \nwill terminate the waiver effective January 1, 2001.\"\n \nLet me know if you want the entire order.\n \nDan"}
{"text": "I keep this little message around to help remind  myself  what a truly blessed life I have had when things aren't going the  way I think they should. After reading the paper the last few days I thought you  might need a Hug.  Jan, Corby, Holly, Tanner, Gunner and I all love you. What more could anyone ask  for? Hang in there.   \n> THE BEST DAY OF MY LIFE  \n>  \n> Today, when I awoke, I suddenly realized that this is the best  day of my  \n> life, ever!  \n>  \n> There were times when I wondered if I would make it to today;  but I did!  \n> And because I did I'm going to celebrate!  \n>  \n> Today, I'm going to celebrate what an unbelievable life I have  had so  \n> far: the accomplishments, the many blessings, and, yes, even the  \n> hardships because they have served to make me stronger.  \n>  \n> I will go through this day with my head held high, and a happy  heart.  \n>  \n> I will marvel at God's seemingly simple gifts: the morning dew,  the sun,  \n> the clouds, the trees, the flowers, the birds. Today, none of  these  \n> miraculous creations will escape my notice.  \n>  \n> Today, I will share my excitement for life with other people.  I'll make  \n> someone smile. I'll go out of my way to perform an unexpected  act of  \n> kindness for someone I don't even know.  \n>  \n> Today, I'll give a sincere compliment to someone who seems down.  I'll  \n> tell a child how special he is, and I'll tell someone I love  just how  \n> deeply I care for them and how much they mean to me.  \n>  \n> Today is the day I quit worrying about what I don't have and  start being  \n> grateful for all the wonderful things God has already given me.  \n>  \n> I'll remember that to worry is just a waste of time because my  faith in  \n> God and his Divine Plan ensures everything will be just fine.  \n>  \n> Tonight, before I go to bed, I'll go outside and raise my eyes  to the  \n> heavens. I will stand in awe at the beauty of the stars and the  moon,  \n> and I will praise God for these magnificent treasures.  \n>  \n> As the day ends and I lay my head down on my pillow, I will  thank the  \n> Almighty for the best day of my life. And I will sleep the sleep  of a  \n> contented child, excited with expectation because I know  tomorrow is  \n> going to be ......  \n> The Best Day Of My Life!  \n>  \n> -- Author Unknown  \n>  \n> <>< <>< <>< <>< <><  <>< <>< <>< <><  \n>  \n>  \n>  \n\nGet your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com"}
{"text": "Can youn craft a generic document to handle both cases?\n\nDave\n\n\n\n\nMark Taylor\n03/02/2000 01:09 AM\nTo: David Forster/LON/ECT@ECT\ncc:  \n\nSubject: Re: New PA form  \n\nI had assumed we were going to have a separate PA for the Auction-only \ncounterparties.  The PA contains an unfortunate reference to the ETA which \nwill need to change if they will only be accepting the Auction-only agreement.\n\n\n\nDavid Forster\n02/29/2000 10:00 AM\nTo: Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT, Justin Boyd/LON/ECT@ECT\ncc: Mark Dilworth/LON/ECT@ECT, Sheri Thomas/HOU/ECT@ECT, Amita \nGosalia/LON/ECT@ECT \nSubject: New PA form\n\nMark/Justin,\n\nAttached is a copy of the Australian PA. It includes the addition of an \nAddress for Service.\n\nDo you think we should incorporate this in our other PA's as well?\n\nI realise that in many instances we are already doing business with the \nrelevant company - and the same or similar information might be included on \nthe Registration form (where completed) - but are you concerned about \nambiguity in the event that no Registration form is completed?\n\nAlso: We will need to have some way to distinguish PA's which arrive for \ncustomers who want access to Auctions only. What do you think about adding a \nstatement like: \"(Optional): Tick this box if you wish to have access only to \nEnronOnline auctions and not to the main transactions site\"  [tick box].\n\nIf you wish to proceed with either of the above, we will need to revise all \nPA's and post them on the website.\n\nThanks,\n\nDave"}
{"text": "Michelle,\n\n\tHere's a draft of the letter. Please let me know what you think. Thanks.\n\n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tBill"}
{"text": "Leslie:\nWe are holding LC's that expire 12/31/01 for the following counterpaerties:\n\nNiagra Mohawk Energy Marketing Inc. (financial)\nMetromedia Energy Inc.  (physical)\nSimpson Tacoma Kraft Company (physical)\nThe Energy Authority (physical)\nEnergy Production Corporation (financial)\nRising Star Energy LLC (financial)\n\n\nAre there any past due payments owed by these counterparties?  When are the next payments due?\n\nCarol St. Clair\nEB 4539\n713-853-3989 (phone)\n713-646-3393 (fax)\n281-382-1943 (cell phone)\n8774545506 (pager)\n281-890-8862 (home fax)\[email protected]"}
{"text": "Did you read this?  This is stupid!  The only way that you will be able to \nremember your password under these guidlines is to write it down.  I am sure \nthere is NO security risk about leaving passwords on a sticky note slapped on \nyour monitor.\n\n -----Original Message-----\nFrom:  Enron Announcements/Corp/Enron@ENRON \n[mailto:[email protected]]  On \nBehalf Of IT Security & Controls@ENRON\nSent: Thursday, March 08, 2001 4:42 PM\nTo: Enron Authenticated Corp Users@ENRON\nSubject: Password Security Notice\n\nFor Password Renewals Only \n\nIT Security & Controls \u0001) Password Security Notice\n \nPasswords\nThe key to maintaining information and system security is the use of \nwell-selected and guarded passwords.  Because your password is our first line \nof defense, stronger password selection criteria will soon be implemented for \nall employees.  \n\nPassword Policy\n\nPasswords\u0001(\n1. must be at least of eight characters in length. \n2. must not contain names, userids, common English dictionary words, and \nbegin or end with a number.\n3. must contain alphanumeric characters and contain at least one special \ncharacter. No more than fifty percent of the overall password can be in \nEnglish.\n4. must not be reused or cyclical. \n5. must be changed every 60 days.\n6. must not be publicly displayed.\n7. must not be shared with other users.\n \nChoosing a good password comes down to two things.  First, avoid common \neveryday words a potential hacker\u0001,s software will be looking for.  Second, \nkeep your password  simple enough that you can remember it without having to \nwrite it down. \n\nPlease keep in mind that the Enron Code of Ethics holds employees responsible \nfor password security.  IT Security & Controls conducts periodic audits to \nensure compliance with company policy. \n\nhttp://itc.corp.enron.com/data/policiesandprocedures/ITPasswordScreenSaver/\n\nFor any problems encountered concerning password controls, please call your \nappropriate Resolution Center (available: 24Hrs./day, 7 days/week)."}
{"text": "Jeff, I met with Larry Frimmerman for breakfast this morning and he would be \ninterested in meeting with Richardson and also serving on the panel.  He was \nsurprised by  Enron's concern that things were getting bogged down because \nhis impression was that progress was being made.  He also had no problem with \neither NERC or GISB participation and felt that NERC has been fairly \nsympathetic to NASUCA.  With respect to some of the consumer issues, there is \na fear that a national standard will weaken gains made in individual states \nthat are more progressive than the national standard might be.  Finally, he \nsuggested that a list be made of the technical versus policy (Consumer) \nissues so that we can at least try and move on the technical issues.  I \nsuggested that I would have you call to clarify the details on the issues \nthat Enron believes are not being addressed fast enough.  Overall, I would \ncharacterize Larry as very supportive of getting things done quickly, but \nconcerned about protecting the consumer interests in the process.  (Right of \nreturn, disconnection USF issues).\n\nLarry can be reached at 614-466-8574\n\nJanine\n\n\n\n\nJeff Brown\n06/28/2000 01:09 PM\nTo: Stanley Horton/Corp/Enron@Enron, Steven J Kean/HOU/EES@EES, Richard \nShapiro/HOU/EES@EES, Janine Migden/DUB/EES@EES, Shelley \nCorman/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Cynthia Sandherr/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Joe \nHartsoe/Corp/Enron@ENRON\ncc: Julie A Gomez/HOU/ECT@ECT \nSubject: Action Items - Blue Ribbon Panel\n\nPlease notice the individual assignments.  Let me know if you have any \nquestions or concerns.\n\nThanks - Jeff"}
{"text": "Here are the answers to your additional questions.  Please give us a call if \nyou have any more questions.  Thanks!\nBen"}
{"text": "?????\n\n\n----Original Message-----\nFrom: \tJames, Terrie  \nSent:\tTuesday, October 23, 2001 9:07 AM\nTo:\tHorton, Stanley; Kitchen, Louise; Sherriff, John; Mcconnell, Mike; McMahon, Jeffrey; Dietrich, Janet\nCc:\tKean, Steven J.; Olson, Cindy; Clark, Morris; Lavorato, John; Delainey, David; Daw, Nicki\nSubject:\tManagement Conference - Business Unit Panel\n\n\nHello All,\n\nI'm planning the agenda for this year's Management Conference.  I've been working on the upcoming meeting since March, but as you can imagine, the direction has changed several times.  \n\nWe are delighted to have General Norman Schwarzkopf delivering a keynote address on leadership, and Gary Hamel returning to help us process the past year.  While we have arranged an all-star line up of outside speakers, we also want to focus on what is happening inside Enron.  Rather than having only one or two business presentations, Mark Frevert has opted to moderate a panel to provide a high level overview of each of our primary operating units and has selected each of you to participate.\n\nCurrently, the panel is scheduled to take place 8:00-9:30am on Friday, November 16.  Please plan to present a very high level overview of your business.  You are welcome to use PowerPoint slides, but in the interest of time, presentations must be no more than 10 minutes.  Mark will introduce each of you, interject questions, encourage interaction, and ensure we stay on time. \n\nBelow is the proposed order for your presentations.  Regardless of your place in the rundown, you will need to be seated on stage by 7:50am and equipped with a microphone.  Because we have a full agenda that morning, we will try to begin the session promptly at 8:00am.\n\nStan Horton - Global Services\nLouise Kitchen - Americas\nJohn Sherriff - Europe\nMike McConnell - Global Markets\nJeff McMahon - Industrial Markets\nJanet Dietrich - Retail\n\nIf you elect to use a PowerPoint presentation, please forward it to me electronically by Friday, November 9 or provide the presentation to me on CD at the Management Conference.  To ensure consistancy, I've attached a PowerPoint template that I would like you to use.  \n\n \n\nFinally, Mark would like to meet with the six of you to finalize preparation for the panel at 4:00pm on Wednesday, November 14 following your arrival at the Management Conference.  The meeting will take place in the Library off the Main Lobby of the Westin La Cantera.  In the meantime, if you have any questions or need any assistance, please contact me.  I look forward to working with you.\n\nRegards,\nTerrie James\nSenior Director, Corporate Communication\n(ph) 713.853.7727\n(fax) 713.646.3248\[email protected]"}
{"text": "Tanya, here are the draft confirms that we have negotiated with Sierra. I am also going to add some specific language regarding delivery point and pro-rata cuts.. and you guys need to work with gerald and put in netting / set off language that you feel protects our interests. \n\nAs an aside, I talked to the commercial person at Sierra and advised them that we will be amending this draft again to incorporate Netting provisions and she advised me that that would not be a problem. \n\nThanks.  BT \n---------------------- Forwarded by Barry Tycholiz/NA/Enron on 04/18/2001 05:10 PM ---------------------------\n\n\nGerald Nemec@ECT\n04/16/2001 05:23 PM\nTo:\tBarry Tycholiz/NA/Enron@ENRON\ncc:\t \n\nSubject:\tRevised Sierra Confirms\n\nPeriod of Delivery language revised per your email."}
{"text": "---------------------- Forwarded by Phillip K Allen/HOU/ECT on 04/24/2001 \n02:23 PM ---------------------------\n\n\nEric Benson@ENRON on 04/24/2001 11:47:40 AM\nTo: Phillip K Allen/HOU/ECT@ECT\ncc:  \nSubject: Instructions for FERC Meetings\n\nMr. Allen - \n\nPer our phone conversation, please see the instructions below to get access \nto view FERC meetings.  Please advise if there are any problems, questions or \nconcerns.\n\nEric Benson\nSr. Specialist\nEnron Government Affairs - The Americas\n713-853-1711\n\n++++++++++++++++++++++++++\n\n----- Forwarded by Eric Benson/NA/Enron on 04/24/2001 01:45 PM -----\n\n\tJanet Butler\n\t11/06/2000 04:51 PM\n\t\t \n\t\t To: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected]\n\t\t cc: \n\t\t Subject: Instructions for FERC Meetings\n\nAs long as you are configured to receive Real Video, you should be able to \naccess the FERC meeting this Wednesday, November 8.  The instructions are \nbelow.\n\n\n---------------------- Forwarded by Janet Butler/ET&S/Enron on 11/06/2000 \n04:49 PM ---------------------------\n\n\nJanet Butler\n10/31/2000 04:12 PM\nTo: [email protected], James D Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron, \[email protected]\ncc: Shelley Corman/ET&S/Enron@Enron \n\nSubject: Instructions for FERC Meetings\n\n\n\t\n\nHere is the URL address for the Capitol Connection.  You should be able to \nsimply click on this URL below and it should come up for you.  (This is \nassuming your computer is configured for Real Video/Audio).  We will pay for \nthe annual contract and bill your cost centers.\n\nYou are connected for tomorrow as long as you have access to Real Video.\n\nhttp://www.capitolconnection.gmu.edu/\n\nInstructions:\n\nOnce into the Capitol Connection sight, click on FERC\nClick on first line (either \"click here\" or box)\nDialogue box should require:  user name:  enron-y\n              password:  fercnow\n\nReal Player will connect you to the meeting\n\nExpand your screen as you wish for easier viewing\n\nAdjust your sound as you wish"}
{"text": "Dipak,\n\nAs you requested, here are the West Desk's forecasts for California Reciepts \nminus instate production by month.  They are broken down into delivery points \nonto Socal and PGE's system.  Please let me know if you have any questions.  \nThanks.\n\nMat"}
{"text": "---------------------- Forwarded by Greg Whalley/HOU/ECT on 12/28/99 11:21 AM \n---------------------------\n   \n\t\n\t\n\tFrom:  Greg Whalley                           12/27/99 01:37 PM\n\t\n\nTo: Tim Belden/HOU/ECT@ECT\ncc:  \nSubject: CalPX\n\njust some thoughts on what we might say in a letter if we have to send one by \nthe 4th."}
{"text": "At the request of Rahil Jafry, attached is our form of bilateral \nConfidentiality Agreement.   Please let me know if the attached meets with \nyour approval."}
{"text": "Hi Corporate Finance students,\n\nYour class will be meeting in C135 from now on, a bigger room with 59\nseats.  Since there are no classes this Monday, you will meet in C135\nbeginning Monday, February 26.\n\nThanks!\nTJ"}
{"text": "FYI - \n\nPublic comments were recently posted in response to the FTC's February 2001 \nnotice seeking information regarding different regulatory approaches to \ncompetition in the retail sale of electricity.   Below is a list of \ncontributors.\n\nIf you are interested, you may view comments at \nhttp://www.ftc.gov/os/comments/eleccompetition/index.htm.  We have also \nposted the comments on the internal Deregulation Info Central site \n(http://eeshou-ln3.ees.enron.com/energyservices/deregulation.nsf/Home+Page/Sta\nrt?opendocument).\n\nAlternatively, I have a number of complete sets of all comments (the set \ncomprises two big binders) at my desk.\n\nContributors:\nAir Conditioning Contractors of America \nAllegheny Energy, Inc.(Pamela J. Mills, Esq) \nAlliance for Retail Energy Markets (Daniel W. Douglass) \nAARP (Martin A. Corry) \nCenter for the Advancement of Energy Markets (Philip M. Marston) \nCleco Corporation  \nCoalition for Fair Competition in Rural Markets (Ed Newberry) \nEdison Electric Institute (David K. Owens, et al) \nElectric Consumers' Alliance (Robert K. Johnson) \nElectric Power Supply Association (Julie Simon) \nElectricity Consumers Resource Council \nEnron Corporation (Robert J. Frank)  \nExelon Corporation \nFlorida Public Service Commission \nGreen Mountain Energy Company \nIllinois Commerce Commission (Randy Rismiller)  \nIndiana Utility Regulatory Commission \nIndustrial Energy Consumers of Pennsylvania, et al. (David M. Kleppinger)  \nMaine Public Advocate Office (Stephen G. Ward) \nMaine Public Utilities Commission (Thomas L. Welch) \nMaryland Office of People's Counsel \nMercatus Center \nMichigan Public Service Commission \nMidAmerican Energy\nMinnesota Power (David J. McMillan) \nMG Industries \nNational Alliance for Fair Competition (Anthony M. Ponticelli) \nNational Association of Regulatory Utility Commissioners (James Bradford \nRamsay, Sharla M. Barklind) \nNational Energy Marketers Association \nNational Rural Electric Cooperative Association (Pamela Silberstein)\nNew Jersey Division of the Ratepayer Advocate  \nNew Power Company (Kathleen E. Magruder) \nNew York State Attorney General (Eliot Spitzer) \nNortheast Texas Electric Cooperatice, Inc. (William H. Burchette)\nNuclear Energy Institute (Dave Fisher) \nOhio Consumers' Counsel (Robert S. Tongren) \nPennsylvania Office of Consumer Advocate \nPennsylvania Public Utility Commission (Andrew S. Tubbs, et al.) \nPotomac Electric Power Company (Mindy L. Herman) \nProcess Gas Consumers Group (Katherine P. Yarbrough) \nPublic Service Commission of the State of New York (Paul B. Powers)\nReason Public Policy Institute (Lynne Kiesling) \nReliant Energy Retail Services, LLC (Keith M. Sappenfield) \nShell Energy Services Co., L.L.C. (Juditch W. Burrow) \nStrategic Energy L.L.C. (Alex Galatic) [\nTransmission Access Policy Study Group (Robert C. McDiarmid)\nUtility Workers Union of America (Jerrold Oppenheim) \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\nhttp://www.ftc.gov/os/2001/02/eleccompetition.htm"}
{"text": "Start Date: 4/12/01; HourAhead hour: 6;  HourAhead schedule download failed. \nManual intervention required."}
{"text": "The set of dishes for Mom and Dad came to $167.....$21/each.  Send or give money to Theresa....here's her new address:\n\n2264 E. 101st Ave.\nThornton, CO   80229\n\nChristmas Blessings to everyone!!!\n\nLove, Bobbi"}
{"text": "You have received this email because you are listed as a security approver. \nPlease click \nhttp://itcapps.corp.enron.com/srrs/auth/emailLink.asp?ID=000000000009641&Page=\nApproval to review and act upon this request.\n\n\n\n\nRequest ID          : 000000000009641\nRequest Create Date : 12/7/00 5:46:29 PM\nRequested For       : [email protected]\nResource Name       : EOL US Backoffice  Bridge Monitor\nResource Type       : Applications"}
{"text": "Stacy,\n\nI just talked to Palo alto.  They would like to schedule a conference call for tomarrow, noon our time.  I told them it would be up to you.  Please let me know if this gives you enough time.\n\nThanks,\n\nKim Ward\nx30685"}
{"text": "Hahaha. df\n---------------------- Forwarded by Drew Fossum/ET&S/Enron on 01/18/2001 \n11:39 AM ---------------------------\n\n\nSusan Scott\n01/18/2001 11:19 AM\nTo: Drew Fossum@ENRON\ncc:  \n\nSubject: \n\n\nhttp://www.onion.com/onion3701/rural_nebraskan.html"}
{"text": "Deb and I were thinking that if we can't finalize our Europe trip by the end \nof this week-we probably need to postpone it because the clock is ticking. .  \nCan you give us any feedback on your discussions with  American Express or \nMark Frevert..  Thinking about you."}
{"text": "Laurel:  Samantha is going to contact Merrill by phone and let them know of \nthe preexisting ECT Investments agreement so that Merrill can duplicate for \nENA.  Sara\n\n\n\n\tLaurel Adams\n\t09/11/2000 10:45 AM\n\t\t\n\t\t To: Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT\n\t\t cc: \n\t\t Subject: Re: Merrill Lynch Pierce Fenner and Smith/ENA Prime Brokerage \nAgreement\n\nDid you forward copies of the agreement to them, or do I need to do that?  \nThank You!"}
{"text": "I know what you mean.  As far as the bed goes, you should do what I do...Go \naround to the other side and push your wife into the wet area.\nPL"}
{"text": "Marta Henderson is on the road and advised some of you the subject item via\nphone, and I am hereby transmitting this info for her via e-mail.\n\nPlease commence deliveries to Eastrans of 7500 MMBtu/d effective 10/19/00\nuntil further notice.\n\nThe redeliveries will be 7500 MMBtu/d from Fuels Cotton Valley into HPL.\n\nThank you."}
{"text": "> -----Original Message-----\n> From: Michael Nacht [SMTP:[email protected]]\n> Sent: Thursday, August 03, 2000 2:03 AM\n> To: [email protected]\n> Cc: [email protected]\n> Subject: reply\n>\n> Hi Rob:  Great idea about a seminar on electric power. I'm on vacation for\n> awhile, but once classes rev up in late August we'll see if we can put it\n> on.  I'm sure there would be great interest.  Thanks also for your efforts\n> with the alums which are really beginning to pay off.  Have a nice rest of\n> the summer.  Cheers, Michael"}