Datasets:

mbzuai-ugrip-statement-tuning

/

xcodah_eng

like 0

Follow

MBZUAI UGRIP Statement Tuning 9

Undoubtedly, the statement "Anne got hitched. She wore a beautiful dress and was surrounded by her friends and family. She ate a wedding cake." holds logic.

There is clarity in the statement "Anne got hitched. She wore a beautiful dress and was surrounded by her friends and family. She ate a wedding cake.".

The statement "Anne got hitched. She wore a beautiful dress and was surrounded by her friends and family. She ate a birthday cake." makes sense.

The statement "Anne got hitched. She wore a beautiful dress and was surrounded by her friends and family. She ate a birthday cake." is sensible and coherent.

Clearly, the statement "Anne got hitched. She wore a beautiful dress and was surrounded by her friends and family. She ate a birthday cake." is logical.

It is evident that the statement "Anne got hitched. She wore a beautiful dress and was surrounded by her friends and family. She ate a birthday cake." is reasonable.

Undoubtedly, the statement "Anne got hitched. She wore a beautiful dress and was surrounded by her friends and family. She ate a birthday cake." holds logic.

There is clarity in the statement "Anne got hitched. She wore a beautiful dress and was surrounded by her friends and family. She ate a birthday cake.".

The statement "The guy's roommate left the toilet seat up for the tenth time. The guy yelled at him" makes more sense than the statement "The guy's roommate left the toilet seat up for the tenth time. The guy found the seat for the roommate".

The statement "The guy's roommate left the toilet seat up for the tenth time. The guy yelled at him" is clearer compared to "The guy's roommate left the toilet seat up for the tenth time. The guy found the seat for the roommate".

"The guy's roommate left the toilet seat up for the tenth time. The guy yelled at him" is more reasonable than "The guy's roommate left the toilet seat up for the tenth time. The guy found the seat for the roommate".

Between the two, "The guy's roommate left the toilet seat up for the tenth time. The guy yelled at him" is the more sensible statement over "The guy's roommate left the toilet seat up for the tenth time. The guy found the seat for the roommate".

"The guy's roommate left the toilet seat up for the tenth time. The guy yelled at him" presents a clearer rationale than "The guy's roommate left the toilet seat up for the tenth time. The guy found the seat for the roommate".

When comparing, "The guy's roommate left the toilet seat up for the tenth time. The guy yelled at him" is more coherent than "The guy's roommate left the toilet seat up for the tenth time. The guy found the seat for the roommate".

Statement "The guy's roommate left the toilet seat up for the tenth time. The guy yelled at him" is more logical than "The guy's roommate left the toilet seat up for the tenth time. The guy sat down".

Statement "The guy's roommate left the toilet seat up for the tenth time. The guy yelled at him" exhibits greater logic than "The guy's roommate left the toilet seat up for the tenth time. The guy sat down".

In terms of logic, "The guy's roommate left the toilet seat up for the tenth time. The guy yelled at him" surpasses "The guy's roommate left the toilet seat up for the tenth time. The guy sat down".

"The guy's roommate left the toilet seat up for the tenth time. The guy yelled at him" shows a higher degree of logical reasoning than "The guy's roommate left the toilet seat up for the tenth time. The guy sat down".

Compared to "The guy's roommate left the toilet seat up for the tenth time. The guy sat down"., statement "The guy's roommate left the toilet seat up for the tenth time. The guy yelled at him" is the more logical choice

Between the two, "The guy's roommate left the toilet seat up for the tenth time. The guy yelled at him" is the more logical statement compared to "The guy's roommate left the toilet seat up for the tenth time. The guy sat down".

The statement "The guy's roommate left the toilet seat up for the tenth time. The guy found the seat for the roommate" makes more sense than the statement "The guy's roommate left the toilet seat up for the tenth time. The guy yelled at him".

The statement "The guy's roommate left the toilet seat up for the tenth time. The guy found the seat for the roommate" is clearer compared to "The guy's roommate left the toilet seat up for the tenth time. The guy yelled at him".

"The guy's roommate left the toilet seat up for the tenth time. The guy found the seat for the roommate" is more reasonable than "The guy's roommate left the toilet seat up for the tenth time. The guy yelled at him".

Between the two, "The guy's roommate left the toilet seat up for the tenth time. The guy found the seat for the roommate" is the more sensible statement over "The guy's roommate left the toilet seat up for the tenth time. The guy yelled at him".

"The guy's roommate left the toilet seat up for the tenth time. The guy found the seat for the roommate" presents a clearer rationale than "The guy's roommate left the toilet seat up for the tenth time. The guy yelled at him".

When comparing, "The guy's roommate left the toilet seat up for the tenth time. The guy found the seat for the roommate" is more coherent than "The guy's roommate left the toilet seat up for the tenth time. The guy yelled at him".

Statement "The guy's roommate left the toilet seat up for the tenth time. The guy sat down" is more logical than "The guy's roommate left the toilet seat up for the tenth time. The guy yelled at him".

Statement "The guy's roommate left the toilet seat up for the tenth time. The guy sat down" exhibits greater logic than "The guy's roommate left the toilet seat up for the tenth time. The guy yelled at him".

In terms of logic, "The guy's roommate left the toilet seat up for the tenth time. The guy sat down" surpasses "The guy's roommate left the toilet seat up for the tenth time. The guy yelled at him".

"The guy's roommate left the toilet seat up for the tenth time. The guy sat down" shows a higher degree of logical reasoning than "The guy's roommate left the toilet seat up for the tenth time. The guy yelled at him".

Compared to "The guy's roommate left the toilet seat up for the tenth time. The guy yelled at him"., statement "The guy's roommate left the toilet seat up for the tenth time. The guy sat down" is the more logical choice

Between the two, "The guy's roommate left the toilet seat up for the tenth time. The guy sat down" is the more logical statement compared to "The guy's roommate left the toilet seat up for the tenth time. The guy yelled at him".

The statement "The guy's roommate left the toilet seat up for the tenth time. The guy yelled at him" makes sense.

The statement "The guy's roommate left the toilet seat up for the tenth time. The guy yelled at him" is sensible and coherent.

Clearly, the statement "The guy's roommate left the toilet seat up for the tenth time. The guy yelled at him" is logical.

It is evident that the statement "The guy's roommate left the toilet seat up for the tenth time. The guy yelled at him" is reasonable.

Undoubtedly, the statement "The guy's roommate left the toilet seat up for the tenth time. The guy yelled at him" holds logic.

There is clarity in the statement "The guy's roommate left the toilet seat up for the tenth time. The guy yelled at him".

The statement "The guy's roommate left the toilet seat up for the tenth time. The guy brought the toilet to the roommate" makes sense.

The statement "The guy's roommate left the toilet seat up for the tenth time. The guy brought the toilet to the roommate" is sensible and coherent.

Clearly, the statement "The guy's roommate left the toilet seat up for the tenth time. The guy brought the toilet to the roommate" is logical.

It is evident that the statement "The guy's roommate left the toilet seat up for the tenth time. The guy brought the toilet to the roommate" is reasonable.

Undoubtedly, the statement "The guy's roommate left the toilet seat up for the tenth time. The guy brought the toilet to the roommate" holds logic.

There is clarity in the statement "The guy's roommate left the toilet seat up for the tenth time. The guy brought the toilet to the roommate".

The statement "Tom builds software at his company. He is a software engineer." makes more sense than the statement "Tom builds software at his company. He owns that thing.".

The statement "Tom builds software at his company. He is a software engineer." is clearer compared to "Tom builds software at his company. He owns that thing.".

"Tom builds software at his company. He is a software engineer." is more reasonable than "Tom builds software at his company. He owns that thing.".

Between the two, "Tom builds software at his company. He is a software engineer." is the more sensible statement over "Tom builds software at his company. He owns that thing.".

"Tom builds software at his company. He is a software engineer." presents a clearer rationale than "Tom builds software at his company. He owns that thing.".

When comparing, "Tom builds software at his company. He is a software engineer." is more coherent than "Tom builds software at his company. He owns that thing.".

Statement "Tom builds software at his company. He is a software engineer." is more logical than "Tom builds software at his company. He must have a high salary in his company.".

Statement "Tom builds software at his company. He is a software engineer." exhibits greater logic than "Tom builds software at his company. He must have a high salary in his company.".

In terms of logic, "Tom builds software at his company. He is a software engineer." surpasses "Tom builds software at his company. He must have a high salary in his company.".

"Tom builds software at his company. He is a software engineer." shows a higher degree of logical reasoning than "Tom builds software at his company. He must have a high salary in his company.".

Compared to "Tom builds software at his company. He must have a high salary in his company."., statement "Tom builds software at his company. He is a software engineer." is the more logical choice

Between the two, "Tom builds software at his company. He is a software engineer." is the more logical statement compared to "Tom builds software at his company. He must have a high salary in his company.".

The statement "Tom builds software at his company. He owns that thing." makes more sense than the statement "Tom builds software at his company. He is a software engineer.".

The statement "Tom builds software at his company. He owns that thing." is clearer compared to "Tom builds software at his company. He is a software engineer.".

"Tom builds software at his company. He owns that thing." is more reasonable than "Tom builds software at his company. He is a software engineer.".

Between the two, "Tom builds software at his company. He owns that thing." is the more sensible statement over "Tom builds software at his company. He is a software engineer.".

"Tom builds software at his company. He owns that thing." presents a clearer rationale than "Tom builds software at his company. He is a software engineer.".

When comparing, "Tom builds software at his company. He owns that thing." is more coherent than "Tom builds software at his company. He is a software engineer.".

Statement "Tom builds software at his company. He must have a high salary in his company." is more logical than "Tom builds software at his company. He is a software engineer.".

Statement "Tom builds software at his company. He must have a high salary in his company." exhibits greater logic than "Tom builds software at his company. He is a software engineer.".

In terms of logic, "Tom builds software at his company. He must have a high salary in his company." surpasses "Tom builds software at his company. He is a software engineer.".

"Tom builds software at his company. He must have a high salary in his company." shows a higher degree of logical reasoning than "Tom builds software at his company. He is a software engineer.".

Compared to "Tom builds software at his company. He is a software engineer."., statement "Tom builds software at his company. He must have a high salary in his company." is the more logical choice

Between the two, "Tom builds software at his company. He must have a high salary in his company." is the more logical statement compared to "Tom builds software at his company. He is a software engineer.".

The statement "Tom builds software at his company. He is a software engineer." makes sense.

The statement "Tom builds software at his company. He is a software engineer." is sensible and coherent.

Clearly, the statement "Tom builds software at his company. He is a software engineer." is logical.

It is evident that the statement "Tom builds software at his company. He is a software engineer." is reasonable.

Undoubtedly, the statement "Tom builds software at his company. He is a software engineer." holds logic.

There is clarity in the statement "Tom builds software at his company. He is a software engineer.".

The statement "Tom builds software at his company. He writes bad code." makes sense.

The statement "Tom builds software at his company. He writes bad code." is sensible and coherent.

Clearly, the statement "Tom builds software at his company. He writes bad code." is logical.

It is evident that the statement "Tom builds software at his company. He writes bad code." is reasonable.

Undoubtedly, the statement "Tom builds software at his company. He writes bad code." holds logic.

There is clarity in the statement "Tom builds software at his company. He writes bad code.".

The statement "Rajeev is a bad student. He fails a class." makes more sense than the statement "Rajeev is a bad student. He teaches a class.".

The statement "Rajeev is a bad student. He fails a class." is clearer compared to "Rajeev is a bad student. He teaches a class.".

"Rajeev is a bad student. He fails a class." is more reasonable than "Rajeev is a bad student. He teaches a class.".

Between the two, "Rajeev is a bad student. He fails a class." is the more sensible statement over "Rajeev is a bad student. He teaches a class.".

"Rajeev is a bad student. He fails a class." presents a clearer rationale than "Rajeev is a bad student. He teaches a class.".

When comparing, "Rajeev is a bad student. He fails a class." is more coherent than "Rajeev is a bad student. He teaches a class.".

Statement "Rajeev is a bad student. He fails a class." is more logical than "Rajeev is a bad student. He takes a college class.".

Statement "Rajeev is a bad student. He fails a class." exhibits greater logic than "Rajeev is a bad student. He takes a college class.".

In terms of logic, "Rajeev is a bad student. He fails a class." surpasses "Rajeev is a bad student. He takes a college class.".

"Rajeev is a bad student. He fails a class." shows a higher degree of logical reasoning than "Rajeev is a bad student. He takes a college class.".

Compared to "Rajeev is a bad student. He takes a college class."., statement "Rajeev is a bad student. He fails a class." is the more logical choice

Between the two, "Rajeev is a bad student. He fails a class." is the more logical statement compared to "Rajeev is a bad student. He takes a college class.".

The statement "Rajeev is a bad student. He teaches a class." makes more sense than the statement "Rajeev is a bad student. He fails a class.".

The statement "Rajeev is a bad student. He teaches a class." is clearer compared to "Rajeev is a bad student. He fails a class.".

"Rajeev is a bad student. He teaches a class." is more reasonable than "Rajeev is a bad student. He fails a class.".

Between the two, "Rajeev is a bad student. He teaches a class." is the more sensible statement over "Rajeev is a bad student. He fails a class.".

"Rajeev is a bad student. He teaches a class." presents a clearer rationale than "Rajeev is a bad student. He fails a class.".

When comparing, "Rajeev is a bad student. He teaches a class." is more coherent than "Rajeev is a bad student. He fails a class.".

Statement "Rajeev is a bad student. He takes a college class." is more logical than "Rajeev is a bad student. He fails a class.".

Statement "Rajeev is a bad student. He takes a college class." exhibits greater logic than "Rajeev is a bad student. He fails a class.".