|
1. Title of Database: SPECT heart data |
|
|
|
2. Sources: |
|
|
|
University of Colorado at Denver, Denver, CO 80217, U.S.A. |
|
[email protected] |
|
Lucy S. Goodenday |
|
Medical College of Ohio, OH, U.S.A. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3. Past Usage: |
|
1. Kurgan, L.A., Cios, K.J., Tadeusiewicz, R., Ogiela, M. & Goodenday, L.S. |
|
"Knowledge Discovery Approach to Automated Cardiac SPECT Diagnosis" |
|
Artificial Intelligence in Medicine, vol. 23:2, pp 149-169, Oct 2001 |
|
|
|
Results: The CLIP3 machine learning algorithm achieved 84.0% accuracy |
|
References: |
|
Cios, K.J., Wedding, D.K. & Liu, N. |
|
CLIP3: cover learning using integer programming. |
|
Kybernetes, 26:4-5, pp 513-536, 1997 |
|
|
|
Cios, K.J. & Kurgan, L. |
|
Hybrid Inductive Machine Learning: An Overview of CLIP Algorithms, |
|
In: Jain, L.C., and Kacprzyk, J. (Eds.) |
|
New Learning Paradigms in Soft Computing, |
|
Physica-Verlag (Springer), 2001 |
|
|
|
SPECT is a good data set for testing ML algorithms; it has 267 instances |
|
that are descibed by 23 binary attributes |
|
|
|
Other results (in press): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4. Relevant Information: |
|
The dataset describes diagnosing of cardiac Single Proton Emission Computed Tomography (SPECT) images. |
|
Each of the patients is classified into two categories: normal and abnormal. |
|
The database of 267 SPECT image sets (patients) was processed to extract features that summarize the original SPECT images. |
|
As a result, 44 continuous feature pattern was created for each patient. |
|
The pattern was further processed to obtain 22 binary feature patterns. |
|
The CLIP3 algorithm was used to generate classification rules from these patterns. |
|
The CLIP3 algorithm generated rules that were 84.0% accurate (as compared with cardilogists' diagnoses). |
|
|
|
5. Number of Instances: 267 |
|
6. Number of Attributes: 23 (22 binary + 1 binary class) |
|
7. Attribute Information: |
|
1. OVERALL_DIAGNOSIS: 0,1 (class attribute, binary) |
|
2. F1: 0,1 (the partial diagnosis 1, binary) |
|
3. F2: 0,1 (the partial diagnosis 2, binary) |
|
4. F3: 0,1 (the partial diagnosis 3, binary) |
|
5. F4: 0,1 (the partial diagnosis 4, binary) |
|
6. F5: 0,1 (the partial diagnosis 5, binary) |
|
7. F6: 0,1 (the partial diagnosis 6, binary) |
|
8. F7: 0,1 (the partial diagnosis 7, binary) |
|
9. F8: 0,1 (the partial diagnosis 8, binary) |
|
10. F9: 0,1 (the partial diagnosis 9, binary) |
|
11. F10: 0,1 (the partial diagnosis 10, binary) |
|
12. F11: 0,1 (the partial diagnosis 11, binary) |
|
13. F12: 0,1 (the partial diagnosis 12, binary) |
|
14. F13: 0,1 (the partial diagnosis 13, binary) |
|
15. F14: 0,1 (the partial diagnosis 14, binary) |
|
16. F15: 0,1 (the partial diagnosis 15, binary) |
|
17. F16: 0,1 (the partial diagnosis 16, binary) |
|
18. F17: 0,1 (the partial diagnosis 17, binary) |
|
19. F18: 0,1 (the partial diagnosis 18, binary) |
|
20. F19: 0,1 (the partial diagnosis 19, binary) |
|
21. F20: 0,1 (the partial diagnosis 20, binary) |
|
22. F21: 0,1 (the partial diagnosis 21, binary) |
|
23. F22: 0,1 (the partial diagnosis 22, binary) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8. Missing Attribute Values: None |
|
9. Class Distribution: |
|
|
|
Class |
|
0 55 |
|
1 212 |
|
|
|
Class |
|
0 40 |
|
1 40 |
|
|
|
Class |
|
0 15 |
|
1 172 |
|
|