context: A decrease in the surface energy of the treated surface has been observed in most samples implanted according to the present invention.
answer_0: Realistically, this is due to a reduction in the amount of oxygen and an increase in carbon content in the implanted layer, making the polymer surface more hydrophobic.
answer_1: Personally, this is due to a reduction in the amount of oxygen and an increase in carbon content in the implanted layer, making the polymer surface more hydrophobic.
answer_2: Presumably, this is due to a reduction in the amount of oxygen and an increase in carbon content in the implanted layer, making the polymer surface more hydrophobic.
answer_3: Therefore this is due to a reduction in the amount of oxygen and an increase in carbon content in the implanted layer, making the polymer surface more hydrophobic.
answer_4: Moreover this is due to a reduction in the amount of oxygen and an increase in carbon content in the implanted layer, making the polymer surface more hydrophobic.
answer_5: Thus, this is due to a reduction in the amount of oxygen and an increase in carbon content in the implanted layer, making the polymer surface more hydrophobic.
answer_6: Actually, this is due to a reduction in the amount of oxygen and an increase in carbon content in the implanted layer, making the polymer surface more hydrophobic.
answer_7: On the other hand this is due to a reduction in the amount of oxygen and an increase in carbon content in the implanted layer, making the polymer surface more hydrophobic.
answer_8: In particular, this is due to a reduction in the amount of oxygen and an increase in carbon content in the implanted layer, making the polymer surface more hydrophobic.
answer_9: Meantime, this is due to a reduction in the amount of oxygen and an increase in carbon content in the implanted layer, making the polymer surface more hydrophobic.