context: "The question``is not the wisdom of providing for or recognizing same-sex marriages as a matter of policy ,""Jones wrote in his 41-page order."
answer_0: Rather, he called it a constitutional question about Nevada's right to prohibit recognition of marriages from other states``if those laws do not conform to Nevada's one-man-one-woman civil marriage institution . ''
answer_1: Simultaneously he called it a constitutional question about Nevada's right to prohibit recognition of marriages from other states``if those laws do not conform to Nevada's one-man-one-woman civil marriage institution . ''
answer_2: Optionally, he called it a constitutional question about Nevada's right to prohibit recognition of marriages from other states``if those laws do not conform to Nevada's one-man-one-woman civil marriage institution . ''
answer_3: Collectively, he called it a constitutional question about Nevada's right to prohibit recognition of marriages from other states``if those laws do not conform to Nevada's one-man-one-woman civil marriage institution . ''
answer_4: Meaning, he called it a constitutional question about Nevada's right to prohibit recognition of marriages from other states``if those laws do not conform to Nevada's one-man-one-woman civil marriage institution . ''
answer_5: Elsewhere, he called it a constitutional question about Nevada's right to prohibit recognition of marriages from other states``if those laws do not conform to Nevada's one-man-one-woman civil marriage institution . ''
answer_6: Oddly, he called it a constitutional question about Nevada's right to prohibit recognition of marriages from other states``if those laws do not conform to Nevada's one-man-one-woman civil marriage institution . ''
answer_7: Third, he called it a constitutional question about Nevada's right to prohibit recognition of marriages from other states``if those laws do not conform to Nevada's one-man-one-woman civil marriage institution . ''
answer_8:  he called it a constitutional question about Nevada's right to prohibit recognition of marriages from other states``if those laws do not conform to Nevada's one-man-one-woman civil marriage institution . ''
answer_9: In the end, he called it a constitutional question about Nevada's right to prohibit recognition of marriages from other states``if those laws do not conform to Nevada's one-man-one-woman civil marriage institution . ''