context: "Rob's point went further,``T his isn't just a matter of what people can or can't do, is what people should or should not do""."
answer_0: Meaning, shouldn't we aim for a world where people don't copy other people's ideas as a principle, instead of accepting the fact that people copy?
answer_1: Oddly, shouldn't we aim for a world where people don't copy other people's ideas as a principle, instead of accepting the fact that people copy?
answer_2: In the meantime, shouldn't we aim for a world where people don't copy other people's ideas as a principle, instead of accepting the fact that people copy?
answer_3: In short, shouldn't we aim for a world where people don't copy other people's ideas as a principle, instead of accepting the fact that people copy?
answer_4: Seriously, shouldn't we aim for a world where people don't copy other people's ideas as a principle, instead of accepting the fact that people copy?
answer_5: Still, shouldn't we aim for a world where people don't copy other people's ideas as a principle, instead of accepting the fact that people copy?
answer_6: By doing this, shouldn't we aim for a world where people don't copy other people's ideas as a principle, instead of accepting the fact that people copy?
answer_7: Absolutely, shouldn't we aim for a world where people don't copy other people's ideas as a principle, instead of accepting the fact that people copy?
answer_8: Secondly, shouldn't we aim for a world where people don't copy other people's ideas as a principle, instead of accepting the fact that people copy?
answer_9: Hence, shouldn't we aim for a world where people don't copy other people's ideas as a principle, instead of accepting the fact that people copy?