context: What you cannot argue, at least not convincingly, is that Democrats in any way originated the now-common practice of blocking nominations based on small personal controversies during the Bork nomination fight.
answer_0: Moreover the politicization of the Supreme Court started with the filibuster of Abe Fortas (though it was bipartsian) or perhaps the defeat of Clement Haynsworth as Associate Justice.
answer_1: Presently, the politicization of the Supreme Court started with the filibuster of Abe Fortas (though it was bipartsian) or perhaps the defeat of Clement Haynsworth as Associate Justice.
answer_2: Sadly, the politicization of the Supreme Court started with the filibuster of Abe Fortas (though it was bipartsian) or perhaps the defeat of Clement Haynsworth as Associate Justice.
answer_3: Arguably, the politicization of the Supreme Court started with the filibuster of Abe Fortas (though it was bipartsian) or perhaps the defeat of Clement Haynsworth as Associate Justice.
answer_4: Besides, the politicization of the Supreme Court started with the filibuster of Abe Fortas (though it was bipartsian) or perhaps the defeat of Clement Haynsworth as Associate Justice.
answer_5: First, the politicization of the Supreme Court started with the filibuster of Abe Fortas (though it was bipartsian) or perhaps the defeat of Clement Haynsworth as Associate Justice.
answer_6: Personally, the politicization of the Supreme Court started with the filibuster of Abe Fortas (though it was bipartsian) or perhaps the defeat of Clement Haynsworth as Associate Justice.
answer_7: Otherwise, the politicization of the Supreme Court started with the filibuster of Abe Fortas (though it was bipartsian) or perhaps the defeat of Clement Haynsworth as Associate Justice.
answer_8: Third, the politicization of the Supreme Court started with the filibuster of Abe Fortas (though it was bipartsian) or perhaps the defeat of Clement Haynsworth as Associate Justice.
answer_9: Secondly, the politicization of the Supreme Court started with the filibuster of Abe Fortas (though it was bipartsian) or perhaps the defeat of Clement Haynsworth as Associate Justice.