context: First, it undermines the authority of the ordinary, which Vat II sought to enhance.
answer_0: Secondly, why would a bishop need to ask permission of the Commission charged to extend use of the 1962 Missal and its accompanying rites?
answer_1: By doing this, why would a bishop need to ask permission of the Commission charged to extend use of the 1962 Missal and its accompanying rites?
answer_2: Second, why would a bishop need to ask permission of the Commission charged to extend use of the 1962 Missal and its accompanying rites?
answer_3: In sum, why would a bishop need to ask permission of the Commission charged to extend use of the 1962 Missal and its accompanying rites?
answer_4: Optionally, why would a bishop need to ask permission of the Commission charged to extend use of the 1962 Missal and its accompanying rites?
answer_5: Unsurprisingly, why would a bishop need to ask permission of the Commission charged to extend use of the 1962 Missal and its accompanying rites?
answer_6: Afterward why would a bishop need to ask permission of the Commission charged to extend use of the 1962 Missal and its accompanying rites?
answer_7: Thankfully, why would a bishop need to ask permission of the Commission charged to extend use of the 1962 Missal and its accompanying rites?
answer_8: Inevitably, why would a bishop need to ask permission of the Commission charged to extend use of the 1962 Missal and its accompanying rites?
answer_9: Evidently, why would a bishop need to ask permission of the Commission charged to extend use of the 1962 Missal and its accompanying rites?