context: Intel's market share for the period exceeded 80% of the market in CPU's and 50% of the market for GPU's.
answer_0: Lately, the complaint does not charge Intel with monopolization or attempted monopolization under the Sherman Act.
answer_1: By then the complaint does not charge Intel with monopolization or attempted monopolization under the Sherman Act.
answer_2: Similarly, the complaint does not charge Intel with monopolization or attempted monopolization under the Sherman Act.
answer_3: Yet, the complaint does not charge Intel with monopolization or attempted monopolization under the Sherman Act.
answer_4: Notably, the complaint does not charge Intel with monopolization or attempted monopolization under the Sherman Act.
answer_5: Now, the complaint does not charge Intel with monopolization or attempted monopolization under the Sherman Act.
answer_6: Afterward the complaint does not charge Intel with monopolization or attempted monopolization under the Sherman Act.
answer_7: Originally, the complaint does not charge Intel with monopolization or attempted monopolization under the Sherman Act.
answer_8: Though, the complaint does not charge Intel with monopolization or attempted monopolization under the Sherman Act.
answer_9: Again, the complaint does not charge Intel with monopolization or attempted monopolization under the Sherman Act.