context: Bar Counsel notified the respondent that Bar Counsel was aware that the client had not been paid.
answer_0: Likewise, on May 14 , 2001, the respondent remitted payment in full to the client.
answer_1: Preferably, on May 14 , 2001, the respondent remitted payment in full to the client.
answer_2: In turn, on May 14 , 2001, the respondent remitted payment in full to the client.
answer_3: Collectively, on May 14 , 2001, the respondent remitted payment in full to the client.
answer_4: Thereafter, on May 14 , 2001, the respondent remitted payment in full to the client.
answer_5: Evidently, on May 14 , 2001, the respondent remitted payment in full to the client.
answer_6: Eventually, on May 14 , 2001, the respondent remitted payment in full to the client.
answer_7: Generally, on May 14 , 2001, the respondent remitted payment in full to the client.
answer_8: Simultaneously on May 14 , 2001, the respondent remitted payment in full to the client.
answer_9: Probably, on May 14 , 2001, the respondent remitted payment in full to the client.