context: The point i'm trying to make is the jesus who was crucified is the jesus who was raised.
answer_0: Honestly, i'm not trying to take you down an obscure lane here, but modern scholars like to play around with the Jesus of history and the Christ of faith.
answer_1: Moreover i'm not trying to take you down an obscure lane here, but modern scholars like to play around with the Jesus of history and the Christ of faith.
answer_2: Elsewhere, i'm not trying to take you down an obscure lane here, but modern scholars like to play around with the Jesus of history and the Christ of faith.
answer_3: Originally, i'm not trying to take you down an obscure lane here, but modern scholars like to play around with the Jesus of history and the Christ of faith.
answer_4: Maybe, i'm not trying to take you down an obscure lane here, but modern scholars like to play around with the Jesus of history and the Christ of faith.
answer_5: Again, i'm not trying to take you down an obscure lane here, but modern scholars like to play around with the Jesus of history and the Christ of faith.
answer_6: Slowly, i'm not trying to take you down an obscure lane here, but modern scholars like to play around with the Jesus of history and the Christ of faith.
answer_7: Overall, i'm not trying to take you down an obscure lane here, but modern scholars like to play around with the Jesus of history and the Christ of faith.
answer_8: Meanwhile, i'm not trying to take you down an obscure lane here, but modern scholars like to play around with the Jesus of history and the Christ of faith.
answer_9: Only, i'm not trying to take you down an obscure lane here, but modern scholars like to play around with the Jesus of history and the Christ of faith.