context: He leads the team in minutes and has vastly improved his game.
answer_0: Subsequently, efficiency falls as usage increases-especially for role players-but Meeks has actually seen his efficiency increase as his usage has spiked to a career high.
answer_1: By then efficiency falls as usage increases-especially for role players-but Meeks has actually seen his efficiency increase as his usage has spiked to a career high.
answer_2: Normally, efficiency falls as usage increases-especially for role players-but Meeks has actually seen his efficiency increase as his usage has spiked to a career high.
answer_3: On the contrary, efficiency falls as usage increases-especially for role players-but Meeks has actually seen his efficiency increase as his usage has spiked to a career high.
answer_4: Collectively, efficiency falls as usage increases-especially for role players-but Meeks has actually seen his efficiency increase as his usage has spiked to a career high.
answer_5: Second, efficiency falls as usage increases-especially for role players-but Meeks has actually seen his efficiency increase as his usage has spiked to a career high.
answer_6: Still, efficiency falls as usage increases-especially for role players-but Meeks has actually seen his efficiency increase as his usage has spiked to a career high.
answer_7: In sum, efficiency falls as usage increases-especially for role players-but Meeks has actually seen his efficiency increase as his usage has spiked to a career high.
answer_8: As a result, efficiency falls as usage increases-especially for role players-but Meeks has actually seen his efficiency increase as his usage has spiked to a career high.
answer_9: Surely, efficiency falls as usage increases-especially for role players-but Meeks has actually seen his efficiency increase as his usage has spiked to a career high.