context: First, it assumes that only governments can protect consumers.
answer_0: In particular, it assumes that a government-sustained monopoly has no adverse effects that might offset purported benefits.
answer_1: Moreover it assumes that a government-sustained monopoly has no adverse effects that might offset purported benefits.
answer_2: Second, it assumes that a government-sustained monopoly has no adverse effects that might offset purported benefits.
answer_3: Accordingly it assumes that a government-sustained monopoly has no adverse effects that might offset purported benefits.
answer_4: Rather, it assumes that a government-sustained monopoly has no adverse effects that might offset purported benefits.
answer_5: Meanwhile, it assumes that a government-sustained monopoly has no adverse effects that might offset purported benefits.
answer_6: Naturally, it assumes that a government-sustained monopoly has no adverse effects that might offset purported benefits.
answer_7: Previously, it assumes that a government-sustained monopoly has no adverse effects that might offset purported benefits.
answer_8: Undoubtedly, it assumes that a government-sustained monopoly has no adverse effects that might offset purported benefits.
answer_9: Meantime, it assumes that a government-sustained monopoly has no adverse effects that might offset purported benefits.