prompt
stringlengths 3
940
| output
stringlengths 112
942
|
|---|---|
" ==Speedy deletion of Mariana Zara== A tag has been placed on Mariana Zara requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as | " ==Speedy deletion of Mariana Zara== A tag has been placed on Mariana Zara requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well |
I'm with ^^^ == Speculation == I try my best to remove speculation where I see it. As far as I can tell you are critising me for: * only removing the speculative edits I thought wouldn't start a flame war on the 747 article. That whole list needs deleting IMHO. * removing speculation that BA's operation of the A320 led to them placing further orders. How do you know they wouldn't have placed the order anyway? I agree mention of the A320 order should have been made on the page and I missed that is wasn't mentioned elsewhere. When you put the info back minus the PoV I was quite happy | I'm with ^^^ == Speculation == I try my best to remove speculation where I see it. As far as I can tell you are critising me for: * only removing the speculative edits I thought wouldn't start a flame war on the 747 article. That whole list needs deleting IMHO. * removing speculation that BA's operation of the A320 led to them placing further orders. How do you know they wouldn't have placed the order anyway? I agree mention of the A320 order should have been made on the page and I missed that is wasn't mentioned elsewhere. When you put the info back minus the PoV I was quite happy with |
Murali == Please don't revert my edits without good | Murali == Please don't revert my edits without good reason.
I have a problem with the following code:
var my_id = "1";
var my_name = "1";
var my_email = "1";
var my_password = "1";
var my_password = "1";
var my_email = "1";
var my_password = "1";
var my_email = "1";
|
" :::You're a real pair of Nazi-infatuated knuckle draggers. Why can be so snide and dismissive? (LOL WP:CIV is for people who deserve it and can actually make rational rebuttals). You see my proud ""little Eichmann"", I was the one who added the SS flag in the first place in 2009 when I also added it to the infobox, I created. All I did was go to Wikimedia Commons and search for the most appropriate logo. This is the one I preferred the best. Hence your need for consensus smacks so much of WP:IDL it's ludicrous. So let's recap, a random choice/decision/option I made three years ago is now what you want, huh? I | " :::You're a real pair of Nazi-infatuated knuckle draggers. Why can be so snide and dismissive? (LOL WP:CIV is for people who deserve it and can actually make rational rebuttals). You see my proud ""little Eichmann"", I was the one who added the SS flag in the first place in 2009 when I also added it to the infobox, I created. All I did was go to Wikimedia Commons and search for the most appropriate logo. This is the one I preferred the best. Hence your need for consensus smacks so much of WP:IDL it's ludicrous. So let's recap, a random choice/decision/option I made three years ago is now what you want, huh? I'm |
The Fresh Meat 2 guide needs to be | The Fresh Meat 2 guide needs to be a great addition to the menu.
The Fresh Meat 2 guide is a great addition to the menu. The Fresh Meat 2 guide is a great addition to the menu. The Fresh Meat 2 guide is a great addition to the menu. The Fresh Meat 2 guide is a great addition to the menu. The Fresh Meat 2 guide is a great addition to the menu. The Fresh Meat 2 guide is a great addition to the menu. The Fresh Meat 2 guide |
Rekoh da necu da nastavljamo diskusiju, jer tvoje ucesce i editovanje clanka jednostavno nije relevantno. Ipak par stvari ti necu ostati duzan: 1. Hrvati jesu katolici, ali to je samo jedna stvar po kojoj se razlikuju od Srba!! 2. Itekako govore hrvatskim jezikom, ali na maternjoj ekavici. (cak i da ne govore ekavicom, mesto u kome zive naziivaju kao i vecinski narod) 3. 'proper croatian', 'correct form' su najkontraverzniji moguci pojmovi (procitaj malo gore i zasto) koji se mogu upotrebiti da definises ispravno koriscenje jednog jezika kao sto je de facto (novo)hrvatski. Pa jel ti stvarno mislis da govoris ispravno? Ne sporim ja da se na internetu (na hrvatskim sajtovima, uglavnom usko | Rekoh da necu da nastavljamo diskusiju, jer tvoje ucesce i editovanje clanka jednostavno nije relevantno. Ipak par stvari ti necu ostati duzan: 1. Hrvati jesu katolici, ali to je samo jedna stvar po kojoj se razlikuju od Srba!! 2. Itekako govore hrvatskim jezikom, ali na maternjoj ekavici. (cak i da ne govore ekavicom, mesto u kome zive naziivaju kao i vecinski narod) 3. 'proper croatian', 'correct form' su najkontraverzniji moguci pojmovi (procitaj malo gore i zasto) koji se mogu upotrebiti da definises ispravno koriscenje jednog jezika kao sto je de facto (novo)hrvatski. Pa jel ti stvarno mislis da govoris ispravno? Ne sporim ja da se na internetu (na hrvatskim sajtovima, uglavnom usko) |
" A tag has been placed on Shannon Twomey, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article appears to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding to | " A tag has been placed on Shannon Twomey, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article appears to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding to it |
" ==Speedy deletion of Gallas== A tag has been placed on Gallas, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia per speedy deletion criterion G1. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as an appropriate article, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is appropriate, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add on the top of the article and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information | " ==Speedy deletion of Gallas== A tag has been placed on Gallas, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia per speedy deletion criterion G1. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as an appropriate article, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is appropriate, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add on the top of the article and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information about |
== riise == Go to hell bitch are u | == riise == Go to hell bitch are u?
<jrib> jrib: i'm not sure what you mean, but I think you're right. I'm not sure what you mean, but I think you're right. I'm not sure what you mean, but I think you're right. I'm not sure what you mean, but I think you're right. I'm not sure what you mean, but I think you're right. |
::::Sure but in the MHP we are faced with a natural language statement. All I am objecting to is you claim that a solution which conditions on the door number opened by the host is the way that professionals naturally solve the problem. There is no one foolproof reason for this but there are three arguments which seriously weaken that assertion. They are: ::::1) If you explicitly condition on the host door you should (for consistency) also explicitly condition on the players initial choice of door. ::::2) Depending on your exact interpretation of the problem, as you discuss above, If you explicitly condition | ::::Sure but in the MHP we are faced with a natural language statement. All I am objecting to is you claim that a solution which conditions on the door number opened by the host is the way that professionals naturally solve the problem. There is no one foolproof reason for this but there are three arguments which seriously weaken that assertion. They are: ::::1) If you explicitly condition on the host door you should (for consistency) also explicitly condition on the players initial choice of door. ::::2) Depending on your exact interpretation of the problem, as you discuss above, If you explicitly condition on |
" == Definition of historiography == I feel a large part of the sense of historiography is ignored in the descriptive parts of the entry. In particular I refer to the way in which historiography can be seen to exist as a semi-independent discipline, in particular as demonstrated in the birth of specifically historiographical journals and with the popularity of historiography modules in most university history courses. To put it another way, this is historiography as a form of intellectual history and distinct from the single-issue historiography that can be equated (as in the article) | " == Definition of historiography == I feel a large part of the sense of historiography is ignored in the descriptive parts of the entry. In particular I refer to the way in which historiography can be seen to exist as a semi-independent discipline, in particular as demonstrated in the birth of specifically historiographical journals and with the popularity of historiography modules in most university history courses. To put it another way, this is historiography as a form of intellectual history and distinct from the single-issue historiography that can be equated (as in the article) with |
" Hi Walpoleman, and Welcome to Wikipedia! Welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you enjoy the encyclopedia and want to stay. As a first step, you may wish to read the Introduction. If you have any questions, feel free to ask me at my talk page — I'm happy to help. Or, you can ask your question at the New contributors' help page. - Here are some more resources to help you as you explore and contribute to the world's largest encyclopedia... Finding your way around: * Table of Contents * Department directory Need help? * Questions — a guide on where to ask questions. * Cheatsheet — quick reference on Wikipedia's mark-up | " Hi Walpoleman, and Welcome to Wikipedia! Welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you enjoy the encyclopedia and want to stay. As a first step, you may wish to read the Introduction. If you have any questions, feel free to ask me at my talk page — I'm happy to help. Or, you can ask your question at the New contributors' help page. - Here are some more resources to help you as you explore and contribute to the world's largest encyclopedia... Finding your way around: * Table of Contents * Department directory Need help? * Questions — a guide on where to ask questions. * Cheatsheet — quick reference on Wikipedia's mark-up. |
== hey == kendricks from pittsburgh not compton he | == hey == kendricks from pittsburgh not compton he's a good guy
<kendricks> i'm not sure if i'm right, but i'm not sure if i'm wrong
<kendricks> i'm not sure if i'm wrong
<kendricks> i'm not sure if i'm wrong
<kendricks> i'm not sure if i'm wrong
<kendricks> i'm not sure if i'm wrong
|
" == Ports == OK, I just don't want more unsourced crap to sort through later. This article is already shoddy, poorly-written, poorly-organized, and poorly-sourced. Why don't we try fixing it instead of adding more poorly-source, poorly-written, and poorly-organized crap? Ports don't deserve their own section. Ports belong in a development section. Granted, this article doesn't have such a section, but why don't we try making one instead of contributing more spam? Also, for that matter, what makes ports noteworthy? If it's a port released a decade later with new features as a tenth-anniversary edition or something (Tomb Raider: Anniversary, Resident Evil: Deadly Silence), then I can see why we would | " == Ports == OK, I just don't want more unsourced crap to sort through later. This article is already shoddy, poorly-written, poorly-organized, and poorly-sourced. Why don't we try fixing it instead of adding more poorly-source, poorly-written, and poorly-organized crap? Ports don't deserve their own section. Ports belong in a development section. Granted, this article doesn't have such a section, but why don't we try making one instead of contributing more spam? Also, for that matter, what makes ports noteworthy? If it's a port released a decade later with new features as a tenth-anniversary edition or something (Tomb Raider: Anniversary, Resident Evil: Deadly Silence), then I can see why we would want |
" == Hello == Hello abcdef. As an example of how to get a high-editor-interest change made, you might have noticed just above our recent discussion on the Talk:Origin of the domestic dog page a section titled Lead sentences. Here I have announced that I am about to change the lead sentences on the Origin article, contacted someone who as a special interest in this and who will lend support if they agree with the sentences, and I will wait while others have their say. If after about one week nobody else has responded, I will change those sentences on the Origin page, and also on the highly-sensitive Dog page under the section titled Origin. In the edit | " == Hello == Hello abcdef. As an example of how to get a high-editor-interest change made, you might have noticed just above our recent discussion on the Talk:Origin of the domestic dog page a section titled Lead sentences. Here I have announced that I am about to change the lead sentences on the Origin article, contacted someone who as a special interest in this and who will lend support if they agree with the sentences, and I will wait while others have their say. If after about one week nobody else has responded, I will change those sentences on the Origin page, and also on the highly-sensitive Dog page under the section titled Origin. In the edit, |
":Both Scjessey and I have since edited this section in a way that removed the specific charges, although I re-added that there were ""corruption"" charges. I don't think the specific counts (which K4T seems to be contentiously inserting and re-inserting) make any difference. However, Rezko's indictment and subsequent conviction on public corruption charges is relevant as I argue elsewhere. Obama knew he was under indictment at the time of the land deal, as per the sources. Obama acknowledges, and many sources report, that the ""scrutiny"" over Obama's relationship with Rezko is in part a questioning of Obama's judgment in | ":Both Scjessey and I have since edited this section in a way that removed the specific charges, although I re-added that there were ""corruption"" charges. I don't think the specific counts (which K4T seems to be contentiously inserting and re-inserting) make any difference. However, Rezko's indictment and subsequent conviction on public corruption charges is relevant as I argue elsewhere. Obama knew he was under indictment at the time of the land deal, as per the sources. Obama acknowledges, and many sources report, that the ""scrutiny"" over Obama's relationship with Rezko is in part a questioning of Obama's judgment in the |
" *Brief comments, since there is a bit much text here. The Washington Post URL is fine pointing at the first pagethat's where the article starts. On the father: The Robesonian article (which is an AP article, and also ran in the Washington Post) calls him a devout Muslim,"" and that's the end of it. ""Built"" or ""designed"" a mosque, that's really not so to the point, but I've changed it. The article in Times Daily calls him an architect? Then we call him an architect, until that is proven wrong (accusations such as Caner being a pathological liar and therefore we should doubt everything, those are not helpful). I've | " *Brief comments, since there is a bit much text here. The Washington Post URL is fine pointing at the first pagethat's where the article starts. On the father: The Robesonian article (which is an AP article, and also ran in the Washington Post) calls him a devout Muslim,"" and that's the end of it. ""Built"" or ""designed"" a mosque, that's really not so to the point, but I've changed it. The article in Times Daily calls him an architect? Then we call him an architect, until that is proven wrong (accusations such as Caner being a pathological liar and therefore we should doubt everything, those are not helpful). I've changed |
Vandalizing Vagina right after a block. Looks | Vandalizing Vagina right after a block. Looks like the Vagina is still in the process of getting the Vagina to the right of the Vagina.
The Vagina is still in the process of getting the Vagina to the right of the Vagina.
The Vagina is still in the process of getting the Vagina to the right of the Vagina.
The Vagina is still in the process |
"::::Yet there are equally reliable sources that say the Christ Myth theory is something more than simply Jesus never existed as evidenced by Grant and Walsh as just two examples. As for what I mean by ""'Jesus existed but the Gospel Jesus is a myth-fiction' Idea"" that is simply my rephrasing of the category Remsburg and Boyd-Eddy gave us nearly 100 years apart: ::::Remsburg (1909): ""Many radical Freethinkers believe that Christ is a myth, of which Jesus of Nazareth is the basis, but that these narratives are so legendary and contradictory as to be almost if not wholly, unworthy of credit."" ::::Boyd-Eddy (2007): We have enough to show there was a | "::::Yet there are equally reliable sources that say the Christ Myth theory is something more than simply Jesus never existed as evidenced by Grant and Walsh as just two examples. As for what I mean by ""'Jesus existed but the Gospel Jesus is a myth-fiction' Idea"" that is simply my rephrasing of the category Remsburg and Boyd-Eddy gave us nearly 100 years apart: ::::Remsburg (1909): ""Many radical Freethinkers believe that Christ is a myth, of which Jesus of Nazareth is the basis, but that these narratives are so legendary and contradictory as to be almost if not wholly, unworthy of credit."" ::::Boyd-Eddy (2007): We have enough to show there was a myth |
To bad for you stupid victorians safeway is now wooloworths so | To bad for you stupid victorians safeway is now wooloworths so you can get a good deal of wool.
The only thing that you can do is to get a good deal of wool.
The only thing that you can do is to get a good deal of wool.
The only thing that you can do is to get a good deal of wool.
The only thing that you can do is to get a good deal of wool.
|
== Fuck out of my sight! == Hello, Loser Fuck out | == Fuck out of my sight! == Hello, Loser Fuck out of my sight! == Hello, Loser Fuck out of my sight! == Hello, Loser Fuck out of my sight! == Hello, Loser Fuck out of my sight! == Hello, Loser Fuck out of my sight! == Hello, Loser Fuck out of my sight! == Hello, Loser Fuck out of my sight! == Hello, Loser Fuck out of my sight! == Hello, Loser |
" ===Headers for the history section=== William's version: :History ::Before the Fleischmann–Pons experiment ::Fleischmann–Pons experiment ::Subsequent research My version: :History ::Early research ::Fleischmann–Pons experiment ::Subsequent research I prefer the second version of the headers, because they are briefer and more aesthetic. The second version of the headers convey the exact same information as the first; however, the second version also has brevity and internal symmetry. Little details are important in making a great article, for example, n-dashes instead of hyphens, correct placement of images, simple wording, non-repetitiveness etc. In | " ===Headers for the history section=== William's version: :History ::Before the Fleischmann–Pons experiment ::Fleischmann–Pons experiment ::Subsequent research My version: :History ::Early research ::Fleischmann–Pons experiment ::Subsequent research I prefer the second version of the headers, because they are briefer and more aesthetic. The second version of the headers convey the exact same information as the first; however, the second version also has brevity and internal symmetry. Little details are important in making a great article, for example, n-dashes instead of hyphens, correct placement of images, simple wording, non-repetitiveness etc. In the |
AND THE (2) is for the Joo | AND THE (2) is for the Joo-hoo-Hoo-Hoo-Hoo-Hoo-Hoo-Hoo-Hoo-Hoo-Hoo-Hoo-Hoo-Hoo-Hoo-Hoo-Hoo-Hoo-Hoo-Hoo-Hoo-Hoo-Hoo-Hoo-Hoo-Hoo-Hoo-Hoo-Hoo-Hoo-Hoo |
" :The in-text commented-out passage you quote above was part of the old text. I myself commented it out while quickly editing the beginning of that section because, besides the content, an encyclopedic article cannot pose rhetoric questions like that. Since this page was highly problematic, I left it for a while, and apparently nobody bothered to delete this inappropriate comment in the meantime. Be my guest. :Just a comment for the record... A number of pseudoscientists I've heard about have a double standard when it comes to entities such as chakras. For the believers they speak as if these things were | " :The in-text commented-out passage you quote above was part of the old text. I myself commented it out while quickly editing the beginning of that section because, besides the content, an encyclopedic article cannot pose rhetoric questions like that. Since this page was highly problematic, I left it for a while, and apparently nobody bothered to delete this inappropriate comment in the meantime. Be my guest. :Just a comment for the record... A number of pseudoscientists I've heard about have a double standard when it comes to entities such as chakras. For the believers they speak as if these things were the |
ivjhoahcudhkjashgdkh abdghghsdgkagbdhfasdfashgfhasgfdgbhfgahgdfhasgfhasdgfhasgfhsdagfdsgahasgfsdagfsdhagfasdgasdgkfagskfgdakgaufgshfgasgfudysfgasfgdasfydagfyietfgyegfafgusageuawfgasytgfysgeygfuasdfgashtfgegfuyerfgrtfyiasfguyaefgyatfeyjgfuysdfgaetgfeygfasdfguywgasygfsuhafgerfyigdsgfuegfuydasguyfgeisgfdgfuyasyhgfilsdghlfksdlfghsdtfegyfdfaeraehfgldhksafhddhflhdasghfgyseraofhsbvu hfsuehfjshfjksdhfkasl hfduslh jklsd jkldh jka kjfhasduifhask ksdjhjkhafjkdhiuhfuasdh udshf ubdskfyhduksjghfuiseah kasej sk ksdjghfk sda sdbh dks bsfdbhjksdfhiawteuiedghfyiastefiuatyuer78234y5uht vndklsghsdk lgsdhfsdiagwefuighafukshfd hgfksdjfyhuisdhufiwhau iaegfkl gesudfuieshfsfayiseghaukshbeasehruhekasrkaehruiasty euoghsu huaRKAHR WUIE IEG RGUIWHERKAGIUihuaei yfhruwg huiwfuiehLUF IL gGIGYIFWGFW GYIG iGEWGY GE FGEYF WFGYWGEFYI | ivjhoahcudhkjashgdkh abdghghsdgkagbdhfasdfashgfhasgfdgbhfgahgdfhasgfhasdgfhasgfhsdagfdsgahasgfsdagfsdhagfasdgasdgkfagskfgdakgaufgshfgasgfudysfgasfgdasfydagfyietfgyegfafgusageuawfgasytgfysgeygfuasdfgashtfgegfuyerfgrtfyiasfguyaefgyatfeyjgfuysdfgaetgfeygfasdfguywgasygfsuhafgerfyigdsgfuegfuydasguyfgeisgfdgfuyasyhgfilsdghlfksdlfghsdtfegyfdfaeraehfgldhksafhddhflhdasghfgyseraofhsbvu hfsuehfjshfjksdhfkasl hfduslh jklsd jkldh jka kjfhasduifhask ksdjhjkhafjkdhiuhfuasdh udshf ubdskfyhduksjghfuiseah kasej sk ksdjghfk sda sdbh dks bsfdbhjksdfhiawteuiedghfyiastefiuatyuer78234y5uht vndklsghsdk lgsdhfsdiagwefuighafukshfd hgfksdjfyhuisdhufiwhau iaegfkl gesudfuieshfsfayiseghaukshbeasehruhekasrkaehruiasty euoghsu huaRKAHR WUIE IEG RGUIWHERKAGIUihuaei yfhruwg huiwfuiehLUF IL gGIGYIFWGFW GYIG iGEWGY GE FGEYF WFGYWGEFYIW |
::I'm sorry but I'm such an idiot that I can't make | ::I'm sorry but I'm such an idiot that I can't make a difference.
<p>
<p>
<p>
<p>
<p>
<p>
<p>
<p>
<p>
<p>
<p>
<p>
<p>
<p>
<p>
<p>
<p>
<p>
<p>
<p>
< |
Snake: (to Gloria) Hey, baby. Listen carefully. Someone’s been editing | Snake: (to Gloria) Hey, baby. Listen carefully. Someone’s been editing the scene.
“I’m not going to be able to do that,” she said.
“I’m not going to be able to do that,” she said.
“I’m not going to be able to do that,” she said.
“I’m not going to be able to do that,” she said.
“I’m |
agree claiming a paulites has a different view on foreign | agree claiming a paulites has a different view on foreign policy.
“The fact that the U.S. government is not a member of the U.S. military, and that the U.S. government is not a member of the U.S. military, and that the U.S. government is not a member of the U.S. military, and that the U.S. government is not a member of the U.S. military, and that |
Once this is over, can we make a bunch of empty edits | Once this is over, can we make a bunch of empty edits to the next page?
A:
I think you're right. I think you're right. I think you're right.
A:
I think you're right. I think you're right. I think you're right.
A:
I think you're right. I think you're right. I think you're right.
A |
" == Secret letter to Charles II of Jan. 1672 == My hair stood on end when I read "" Meanwhile, William had written a secret letter to Charles in January 1672 asking his uncle to exploit the situation by exerting pressure on the States-General to appoint William stadtholder"" in the section ""Conflict with republicans."" Since when did the States-General appoint stadtholders? I looked at the citation given (Troost, pp. 65-66) and indeed no such claim is made there. In the quote from the letter, William speaks of ""the States,"" which has to refer to the States of Holland, his most-persistent opponents. Troost does not make the claim that ""States-General"" is intended here. I have deleted ""-General"" | " == Secret letter to Charles II of Jan. 1672 == My hair stood on end when I read "" Meanwhile, William had written a secret letter to Charles in January 1672 asking his uncle to exploit the situation by exerting pressure on the States-General to appoint William stadtholder"" in the section ""Conflict with republicans."" Since when did the States-General appoint stadtholders? I looked at the citation given (Troost, pp. 65-66) and indeed no such claim is made there. In the quote from the letter, William speaks of ""the States,"" which has to refer to the States of Holland, his most-persistent opponents. Troost does not make the claim that ""States-General"" is intended here. I have deleted ""-General"" and |
How the hell can you put guidelines on trivia? Trivia | How the hell can you put guidelines on trivia? Trivia?
I'm not sure if I'm right, but I'm not sure if I'm wrong.
A:
I'm not sure if I'm wrong, but I'm not sure if I'm wrong.
A:
I'm not sure if I'm wrong, but I'm not sure if I'm wrong, but I'm not sure if I'm wrong.
A: |
Whats up with the negativity Why are you dumbass | Whats up with the negativity Why are you dumbass?
I’m not going to say that I’m not going to say that I’m not going to say that I’m not going to say that I’m not going to say that I’m not going to say that I’m not going to say that I’m not going to say that I’m not going to say that I’m not going to say that I’m not going |
Thunderbringerstormbrook. I believe Game reviewers opinions should be voiced on early access as they are influential amongst the community in this area. It's relatively new and their opinions voice concern about them. Early access is relatively also very shady and in a grey zone right now. Minecraft was not a 'early' access it was a indy game released and as more people found it popular-it got more expensive. Mojang started the copy out free, and people gave feedback until the game grew to be a cult classic, to a fun classic, to a all time hit. Minecraft was never early access. Early access strictly talks about crowd funding and alpha funding in early game releases before they | Thunderbringerstormbrook. I believe Game reviewers opinions should be voiced on early access as they are influential amongst the community in this area. It's relatively new and their opinions voice concern about them. Early access is relatively also very shady and in a grey zone right now. Minecraft was not a 'early' access it was a indy game released and as more people found it popular-it got more expensive. Mojang started the copy out free, and people gave feedback until the game grew to be a cult classic, to a fun classic, to a all time hit. Minecraft was never early access. Early access strictly talks about crowd funding and alpha funding in early game releases before they were |
buh hu new lol sam hider needs tu shut the | buh hu new lol sam hider needs tu shut the door for a while, and I'm not sure if I'll be able to get it out of here.
I'm not sure if I'll be able to get it out of here, but I'm not sure if I'll be able to get it out of here.
I'm not sure if I'll be able to get it out of here, but I'm not sure if I'll be able to get it |
" Hi Darkhand0120, and Welcome to Wikipedia! Welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you enjoy the encyclopedia and want to stay. As a first step, you may wish to read the Introduction. If you have any questions, feel free to ask me at my talk page — I'm happy to help. Or, you can ask your question at the New contributors' help page. - Here are some more resources to help you as you explore and contribute to the world's largest encyclopedia... Finding your way around: * Table of Contents * Department directory Need help? * Questions — a guide on where to ask questions. * Cheatsheet — quick reference on Wikipedia's mark-up | " Hi Darkhand0120, and Welcome to Wikipedia! Welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you enjoy the encyclopedia and want to stay. As a first step, you may wish to read the Introduction. If you have any questions, feel free to ask me at my talk page — I'm happy to help. Or, you can ask your question at the New contributors' help page. - Here are some more resources to help you as you explore and contribute to the world's largest encyclopedia... Finding your way around: * Table of Contents * Department directory Need help? * Questions — a guide on where to ask questions. * Cheatsheet — quick reference on Wikipedia's mark-up. |
WTF | WTF_WTF_WTF_WTF_WTF_WTF_WTF_WTF_WTF_WTF_WTF_WTF_WTF_WTF_WTF_WTF_WTF_WTF_WTF_WTF_WTF_WTF_WTF_WTF_WTF_WTF_WTF_WTF_WTF_WTF_WTF_WTF_WTF_W |
Thanks Barry. I'd like to award you a | Thanks Barry. I'd like to award you a medal for the medal.
A:
I think you're right. I'm not sure if you're right. I'm not sure if you're right. I'm not sure if you're right. I'm not sure if you're right. I'm not sure if you're right. I'm not sure if you're right. I'm not sure if you're right.
A |
" Hi Lilly951, and Welcome to Wikipedia! Welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you enjoy the encyclopedia and want to stay. As a first step, you may wish to read the Introduction. If you have any questions, feel free to ask me at my talk page — I'm happy to help. Or, you can ask your question at the New contributors' help page. - Here are some more resources to help you as you explore and contribute to the world's largest encyclopedia... Finding your way around: * Table of Contents * Department directory Need help? * Questions — a guide on where to ask questions. * Cheatsheet — quick reference on Wikipedia's mark-up codes. * Wikipedia's 5 | " Hi Lilly951, and Welcome to Wikipedia! Welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you enjoy the encyclopedia and want to stay. As a first step, you may wish to read the Introduction. If you have any questions, feel free to ask me at my talk page — I'm happy to help. Or, you can ask your question at the New contributors' help page. - Here are some more resources to help you as you explore and contribute to the world's largest encyclopedia... Finding your way around: * Table of Contents * Department directory Need help? * Questions — a guide on where to ask questions. * Cheatsheet — quick reference on Wikipedia's mark-up codes. * Wikipedia's 5- |
== Oil shale in Estonia next steps == Hi, Novickas. Thank you once more for your invaluable help with the Oil shale in Estonia article. The GA review done by was thorough and therefore very useful. I finished to resolve the remaining topic with oil shale coke and semi-coke by creating a new article Spent shale which should address these issues. I am looking forward to nominate the Oil shale in Estonia article for FAC but probably for this we need more fresh looks and thorough high quality reviews. Do you have any ideas who might be interested and able to do a review or just to go through the article? It was years ago when we prepared the main oil shale article for nomination and that time and assisted | == Oil shale in Estonia next steps == Hi, Novickas. Thank you once more for your invaluable help with the Oil shale in Estonia article. The GA review done by was thorough and therefore very useful. I finished to resolve the remaining topic with oil shale coke and semi-coke by creating a new article Spent shale which should address these issues. I am looking forward to nominate the Oil shale in Estonia article for FAC but probably for this we need more fresh looks and thorough high quality reviews. Do you have any ideas who might be interested and able to do a review or just to go through the article? It was years ago when we prepared the main oil shale article for nomination and that time and assisted with |
I dont wanna sound like a queer or nothin' | I dont wanna sound like a queer or nothin' but I'm not a queer person. I'm not a queer person, I'm not a queer person, I'm not queer person, I'm not queer person, I'm not queer person, I'm not queer person, I'm not queer person, I'm not queer person, I'm not queer person, I'm not queer person, I'm not queer person, I'm not queer person, I'm not queer person, I |
:::Thanks Rmhermen, I went to the style manual and discovered the following in addition to what you write above. In scientific contexts, scientific notation is preferred. The implication is that the thin space is for science only (possibly explains my preference for that style). In the examples for larger (bit not as big as pinball) numbers I found the following: ::::The hippopotamus stands 1.5 m (5 ft) at the shoulders and weighs between 2,700 and 4,500 kg (425–710 st or 6,000–9,900 lb). ::::The [[hippopotamus]] stands [[1 E0 m|1.5 m]] (5 ft) at the shoulders and weighs between [[Orders of magnitude (mass)|2,700 and 4,500 kg]] (425–710 st or 6,000–9,900 lb). :::Given this information, and despite my preference for 10 000 m (note thin space used | :::Thanks Rmhermen, I went to the style manual and discovered the following in addition to what you write above. In scientific contexts, scientific notation is preferred. The implication is that the thin space is for science only (possibly explains my preference for that style). In the examples for larger (bit not as big as pinball) numbers I found the following: ::::The hippopotamus stands 1.5 m (5 ft) at the shoulders and weighs between 2,700 and 4,500 kg (425–710 st or 6,000–9,900 lb). ::::The [[hippopotamus]] stands [[1 E0 m|1.5 m]] (5 ft) at the shoulders and weighs between [[Orders of magnitude (mass)|2,700 and 4,500 kg]] (425–710 st or 6,000–9,900 lb). :::Given this information, and despite my preference for 10 000 m (note thin space used in |
== HEYTHERE! == YOUR A FAG! HEY THERE | == HEYTHERE! == YOUR A FAG! HEY THERE! == YOUR A FAG! HEY THERE! == YOUR A FAG! HEY THERE! == YOUR A FAG! HEY THERE! == YOUR A FAG! HEY THERE! == YOUR A FAG! HEY THERE! == YOUR A FAG! HEY THERE! == YOUR A FAG! HEY THERE! == YOUR A FAG! HEY THERE! == YOUR A F |
:::Yeah, it's all a huge conspiracy to | :::Yeah, it's all a huge conspiracy to get the whole world to the point where it's all a little bit of a mystery.
"I'm not going to be able to get the whole world to the point where it's all a little bit of a mystery," he said.
"I'm not going to be able to get the whole world to the point where it's all a little bit of a mystery," he said.
"I'm not going |
== attorney? == Hey, I've been looking for some input about a wikipedia dispute. You seem to be a sharp legal mind, and it seems you've given BigDaddy777 some great advice. Would you be willing to spare me a few minutes of your valuable time too? :Sarcasm and those kinds of persoanl jabs are NOT welcome at Wikipedia and ESPECIALLY on MY talk page. You have NO idea what advice I've given him in private and I advise you to stay the hell away from my talk page from now on. You have earned yourself a lifetime ban, pal! You crossed the line! ::I don't understand. I'm absolutely not | == attorney? == Hey, I've been looking for some input about a wikipedia dispute. You seem to be a sharp legal mind, and it seems you've given BigDaddy777 some great advice. Would you be willing to spare me a few minutes of your valuable time too? :Sarcasm and those kinds of persoanl jabs are NOT welcome at Wikipedia and ESPECIALLY on MY talk page. You have NO idea what advice I've given him in private and I advise you to stay the hell away from my talk page from now on. You have earned yourself a lifetime ban, pal! You crossed the line! ::I don't understand. I'm absolutely not a |
Clearly I'm stupid as I still wasn't logged | Clearly I'm stupid as I still wasn't logged in. I'm not sure if I'm going to be able to get the data from the server, but I'm not sure if I'm going to be able to get the data from the server.
A:
I think you're right. I'm not sure if you're going to be able to get the data from the server. I'm not sure if you're going to be able to get the data from |
I totally agree with you Sca, I could not possibly agree with you more. I understand that Nazi Germany was the aggressor in Europe. There is the problem that misunderstanding people now equate German nationalism with Nazism because the Nazis were the aggressors in Europe (perfect example is das lied der Deutsche. What I think is the biggest question mark of the whole era is what if it had of been another party to have ruled Germany, one that didn't attack Jews or minorities. What if they had of taken German inhabited lands back after their loss at Versailles? would it be considered more acceptable now because it was not a war of conquest like Hitler's war | I totally agree with you Sca, I could not possibly agree with you more. I understand that Nazi Germany was the aggressor in Europe. There is the problem that misunderstanding people now equate German nationalism with Nazism because the Nazis were the aggressors in Europe (perfect example is das lied der Deutsche. What I think is the biggest question mark of the whole era is what if it had of been another party to have ruled Germany, one that didn't attack Jews or minorities. What if they had of taken German inhabited lands back after their loss at Versailles? would it be considered more acceptable now because it was not a war of conquest like Hitler's war? |
Dammit this thing's addictive - Italic | Dammit this thing's addictive - Italic.
The Italian is a great example of the Italian. It's a great example of the Italian. It's a great example of the Italian. It's a great example of the Italian. It's a great example of the Italian. It's a great example of the Italian. It's a great example of the Italian. It's a great example of the Italian. It's a great example of the Italian. It's a great example of |
yes he shot himself in 1963 this article is terrible and | yes he shot himself in 1963 this article is terrible and I think it is a good thing to have a good time.
I think the only thing that I can think of is that the first time I saw a picture of a woman in the picture I was in the picture I was in the picture I was in the picture I was in the picture I was in the picture I was in the picture I was in the picture I was in the picture I was in the picture I was in the |
" == Funny as Hell == This guy's funny as hell. Especially when he takes on Osama bin Ladin. ""Why can't anyone find this guy? How difficult is it to find this guy, 6'6 with a nappy beird and a towel-like thing on his head, when they can find my cousin, 4'6 in Commerce. The guy's probably worth half a million dollars. Look the cave that has the satellite hook-up. If a Rolls Rocye is parked in front of it, n**** probably in there. If you walk inside the cave and there's velvet paintings of Saddam Hussein, I think the n**** in there. Who do they got hunting this dude, unknown name? N****, give me 5 Bloods, 5 Crips, 4 Mexicans and 3 rednecks, | " == Funny as Hell == This guy's funny as hell. Especially when he takes on Osama bin Ladin. ""Why can't anyone find this guy? How difficult is it to find this guy, 6'6 with a nappy beird and a towel-like thing on his head, when they can find my cousin, 4'6 in Commerce. The guy's probably worth half a million dollars. Look the cave that has the satellite hook-up. If a Rolls Rocye is parked in front of it, n**** probably in there. If you walk inside the cave and there's velvet paintings of Saddam Hussein, I think the n**** in there. Who do they got hunting this dude, unknown name? N****, give me 5 Bloods, 5 Crips, 4 Mexicans and 3 rednecks, and |
this website is a \peice a shit asshole | this website is a \peice a shit asshole.
I'm not going to be a dick. I'm not going to be a dick. I'm not going to be a dick. I'm not going to be a dick. I'm not going to be a dick. I'm not going to be a dick. I'm not going to be a dick. I'm not going to be a dick. I'm not going to be a dick. I'm not going to be |
Can you stop replacing the block periods with dollars, | Can you stop replacing the block periods with dollars, the number of times you have to go through the program, the number of times you have to go through the program, the number of times you have to go through the program, the number of times you have to go through the program, the number of times you have to go through the program, the number of times you have to go through the program, the number of times you have to go through the program, the number of times you have |
== Feral druids are really fucking shitty. == Roll a | == Feral druids are really fucking shitty. == Roll a fucking fucking fucking fucking fucking fucking fucking fucking fucking fucking fucking fucking fucking fucking fucking fucking fucking fucking fucking fucking fucking fucking fucking fucking fucking fucking fucking fucking fucking fucking fucking fucking fucking fucking fucking fucking fucking fucking fucking fucking fucking fucking fucking fucking fucking fucking fucking fucking fucking fucking fucking fucking fucking fucking fucking fucking fucking fucking fucking fucking fucking fucking fucking fucking fucking fucking fucking fucking fucking fucking fucking fucking fucking fucking fucking fucking fucking fucking fucking fucking fucking fucking fucking fucking fucking fucking |
" Logicus to Likebox: I suggest Likebox should adopt good faith and civility and consider whether it is not Logicus who is silly and ridiculous and misunderstands here, but rather perhaps Likebox who is insufficiently English-literate to understand the problems with this passage. For as it stands the now revised principle is still vulnerable to an elementary counterexample. For it now states: ""He thought about the case of a uniformly accelerated box, and noted that it would be indistinguishable from a box sitting still in an unchanging gravitational field."" But a uniformly accelerated box is clearly distinguishable from a box at rest - the former is moving but the latter is not. Is the principle this | " Logicus to Likebox: I suggest Likebox should adopt good faith and civility and consider whether it is not Logicus who is silly and ridiculous and misunderstands here, but rather perhaps Likebox who is insufficiently English-literate to understand the problems with this passage. For as it stands the now revised principle is still vulnerable to an elementary counterexample. For it now states: ""He thought about the case of a uniformly accelerated box, and noted that it would be indistinguishable from a box sitting still in an unchanging gravitational field."" But a uniformly accelerated box is clearly distinguishable from a box at rest - the former is moving but the latter is not. Is the principle this right |
Well, no, neither can I. Reading through the discussion at Talk:Australia, it seems most are arguing for it's exclusion because the infobox is only to deal with the most basic information, showing only the national flag, the national anthem, the national arms, etc. God Save the Queen may not be the national anthem, but it seems to me that it was decreed to be an anthem that applies nationally - it is the Royal Anthem all across Australia, and always so, not just when a member of the Royal Famliy is present. ::Additionally, as for precedent, not all articles on countries that are monarchies list a royal anthem; | Well, no, neither can I. Reading through the discussion at Talk:Australia, it seems most are arguing for it's exclusion because the infobox is only to deal with the most basic information, showing only the national flag, the national anthem, the national arms, etc. God Save the Queen may not be the national anthem, but it seems to me that it was decreed to be an anthem that applies nationally - it is the Royal Anthem all across Australia, and always so, not just when a member of the Royal Famliy is present. ::Additionally, as for precedent, not all articles on countries that are monarchies list a royal anthem; the |
"::::I must disagree with your contention that the lead has continually been a source of contention. This month long discussion we are currently in, is the only serious discussion of changing the lead that has been proposed. The language re: the number and names of the investigations was placed in the lead sometime in late 2006/2007. In September of 09, someone replaced that language with ""Oswald is the assassin"", which instituted a discussion that lasted half a day. I replaced that edit with the language that was there until Rudioso showed up about a month ago. The point in relaying this history is that the edit history does not support that there has been some longstanding | "::::I must disagree with your contention that the lead has continually been a source of contention. This month long discussion we are currently in, is the only serious discussion of changing the lead that has been proposed. The language re: the number and names of the investigations was placed in the lead sometime in late 2006/2007. In September of 09, someone replaced that language with ""Oswald is the assassin"", which instituted a discussion that lasted half a day. I replaced that edit with the language that was there until Rudioso showed up about a month ago. The point in relaying this history is that the edit history does not support that there has been some longstanding and |
::Not as gross as watching your dad eat shit | ::Not as gross as watching your dad eat shit.
I'm not sure if I'm going to be able to get a little more information about the subject.
I'm not sure if I'm going to be able to get a little more information about the subject.
I'm not sure if I'm going to be able to get a little more information about the subject.
I'm not sure if I'm going to be able to get a little more information about |
" So you're saying that despite the requirement that reliable sources describe the person commonly and consistently in a certain way, we're just going to do it some other way because the other way is too hard? Is that not just the IDONTLIKEIT argument you keep accusing others of making? I think you'll be hard-pressed to find ""year of publication"" used as a defining characteristic in reliable sources in most cases. And now you want to change the language in the guideline to support what you want to do? Until now you've argued that the language is clear and that it supports your position. Maybe the categories should be sparsely categorized. Not every novelist who's a woman is commonly and consistently discussed as a woman | " So you're saying that despite the requirement that reliable sources describe the person commonly and consistently in a certain way, we're just going to do it some other way because the other way is too hard? Is that not just the IDONTLIKEIT argument you keep accusing others of making? I think you'll be hard-pressed to find ""year of publication"" used as a defining characteristic in reliable sources in most cases. And now you want to change the language in the guideline to support what you want to do? Until now you've argued that the language is clear and that it supports your position. Maybe the categories should be sparsely categorized. Not every novelist who's a woman is commonly and consistently discussed as a woman. |
P.P.S I won't defend current US policy. The current president | P.P.S I won't defend current US policy. The current president is a US president, and he is a US president.
The US president is a US president.
The US president is a US president.
The US president is a US president.
The US president is a US president.
The US president is a US president.
The US president is a US president.
The US president is a US president.
|
I totally agree, religious people are hateful people. If only | I totally agree, religious people are hateful people. If only they were to be a part of the world, they would be a part of the world.
I think the idea of the world is a bit of a lie. I think the idea of the world is a bit of a lie. I think the idea of the world is a bit of a lie. I think the idea of the world is a bit of a lie. I think the idea of the world is a bit |
Penalty for stupidity is that you have to | Penalty for stupidity is that you have to pay for the money.
I have a problem with the law. I have a problem with the law. I have a problem with the law. I have a problem with the law. I have a problem with the law. I have a problem with the law. I have a problem with the law. I have a problem with the law. I have a problem with the law. I have a problem with the law. I have a |
" ==Fitting the regression line== In ==Fitting the regression line== shouldn't the expression immediately before the one containing Cov & Var have 1/n as the multiplier before the - x.y and before the - x^2 terms? This is the form of the expression which is often used in computing to generate a straight-line fit to set of ""bumpy"" data. As expressed here it does not work and moreover does not follow mathematically from the preceding expression! However with the 1/n terms in place it appears to produce the correct result. 1/n is unique to these two terms ONLY and therefore does NOT cancel?!? But then I am a Physicist and not a Mathematician so I may have missed something??? | " ==Fitting the regression line== In ==Fitting the regression line== shouldn't the expression immediately before the one containing Cov & Var have 1/n as the multiplier before the - x.y and before the - x^2 terms? This is the form of the expression which is often used in computing to generate a straight-line fit to set of ""bumpy"" data. As expressed here it does not work and moreover does not follow mathematically from the preceding expression! However with the 1/n terms in place it appears to produce the correct result. 1/n is unique to these two terms ONLY and therefore does NOT cancel?!? But then I am a Physicist and not a Mathematician so I may have missed something???
|
== A == you wanna hear something about copley theres this | == A == you wanna hear something about copley theres this?
A:
You can use the following code to get the list of items:
for (int i = 0; i < list.length; i++) {
for (int j = 0; j < list.length; j++) {
for (int j = 0; j < list.length; j++) {
for (int j = 0; j < list. |
== bUTTHEAD == how many butts do i have | == bUTTHEAD == how many butts do i have to do it?
A:
You can use the following code to get the output of the function:
function(x) {
return x.x;
}
function(x) {
return x.x;
}
function(x) {
return x.x;
}
function(x) {
return x.x;
} |
:So you got yourself an account and are still trying to best Snap? You want to best Snap? Here's three easy steps to do it. :*1: Keep the conversation civil. Personal attacks are generally not tolerated. :*2: Stop whining when you don't get your way. I made that mistake in my early days on Wikipedia, and what did it get me? Accused of being a sockpuppet. Therefore, it's generally wise not to do that. :*3: Now that you actually have an account, try doing something useful. I myself generally try to fight vandalism on all pages on my watchlist and try to reach consensus on merge discussions that appeases the person proposing the | :So you got yourself an account and are still trying to best Snap? You want to best Snap? Here's three easy steps to do it. :*1: Keep the conversation civil. Personal attacks are generally not tolerated. :*2: Stop whining when you don't get your way. I made that mistake in my early days on Wikipedia, and what did it get me? Accused of being a sockpuppet. Therefore, it's generally wise not to do that. :*3: Now that you actually have an account, try doing something useful. I myself generally try to fight vandalism on all pages on my watchlist and try to reach consensus on merge discussions that appeases the person proposing the solution |
"::I have been watching this for some time now, and it is clear that you, John Carter are quite the ""asshole"" (sic.). I you insist on taking this poor souls comments out of context and then you blame him for it. You are an arrogant pompous prick. Try dividing 166 by the actual number of intelligence types (7) and you get a figure much closer to the fact. It is not ""clearly a violation"" of policy as there is no WP:OR, he was quoting , and on top of that only looking for explination. It is your false interpretation, made delibertatly to intimidate and insult, that put the word ""absurd"" in the mouth of when I can see he | "::I have been watching this for some time now, and it is clear that you, John Carter are quite the ""asshole"" (sic.). I you insist on taking this poor souls comments out of context and then you blame him for it. You are an arrogant pompous prick. Try dividing 166 by the actual number of intelligence types (7) and you get a figure much closer to the fact. It is not ""clearly a violation"" of policy as there is no WP:OR, he was quoting, and on top of that only looking for explination. It is your false interpretation, made delibertatly to intimidate and insult, that put the word ""absurd"" in the mouth of when I can see he was |
WANNA GET HIGH ND FLY INTO THE SKY WITH FAT ASS | WANNA GET HIGH ND FLY INTO THE SKY WITH FAT ASSOCIATED WITH THEIR WEEKEND.
"I'm not going to be able to do this without you."
"I'm not going to be able to do this without you."
"I'm not going to be able to do this without you."
"I'm not going to be able to do this without you."
"I'm not going to be able |
" ====Comments and Suggestions==== Addendum to discussion and explanations in First Paragraph. *text changed from ""African"" to reflect actual data provided by cited source; *info box updated to reflect same; map provided for informational purposes; *since source of council's ruling was not cited, the image of the three council cases re. runaways was positioned at the top but can be relocated later in main to support content elsewhere; *""officiating"" was added because it is not known if he was indentured with a definite end-of-service date or already one of a number of those in ""servitude-for-life"" (or living under some other arrangement), so either case may remain an option (""officiating"" | " ====Comments and Suggestions==== Addendum to discussion and explanations in First Paragraph. *text changed from ""African"" to reflect actual data provided by cited source; *info box updated to reflect same; map provided for informational purposes; *since source of council's ruling was not cited, the image of the three council cases re. runaways was positioned at the top but can be relocated later in main to support content elsewhere; *""officiating"" was added because it is not known if he was indentured with a definite end-of-service date or already one of a number of those in ""servitude-for-life"" (or living under some other arrangement), so either case may remain an option (""officiating"" is |
PEOPLE LIKE YOU LIKE MEn IN BED WITH OWEN HAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAH | PEOPLE LIKE YOU LIKE MEn IN BED WITH OWEN HAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA, HAHA, HAHA, HAHA, HA |
== Semi-protected edit request on 16 September | == Semi-protected edit request on 16 September 2010
The following is the list of the following:
The following is the list of the following:
The following is the list of the following:
The following is the list of the following:
The following is the list of the following:
The following is the list of the following:
The following is the list of the following:
The following is the list of the following:
|
"== The Decline of the Roman Empire == Thousands of books have been written about the decline of one of the most developed cultures of human kind. Of course, we have no right to neglect to study this topic. Leaving out the time span of more than thousand years of Roman thought and reality would cut out the ""childhood"" of modern civilization. We have to go back to these centuries long ago to understand why we are who we are today. Read the Wikipedia article to make yourself familiar with the subject. Go to Spengler and Toynbee and research which information the Internet provides for | "== The Decline of the Roman Empire == Thousands of books have been written about the decline of one of the most developed cultures of human kind. Of course, we have no right to neglect to study this topic. Leaving out the time span of more than thousand years of Roman thought and reality would cut out the ""childhood"" of modern civilization. We have to go back to these centuries long ago to understand why we are who we are today. Read the Wikipedia article to make yourself familiar with the subject. Go to Spengler and Toynbee and research which information the Internet provides for the |
I welcome all the parties that is working hard towards improving this page. Lets work together and write a more comprehensive article with strong consensus from everyone. I am going to start by explaining how I see the general structure of this section. To introduce the topic at hand, one or two sentences must be written to introduce the section, such as “The most common form of marriage in Islam is the Nikah” ...(brief explanation here)”. Then the discussion should go towards making the reader be aware that this isn't the only form of marriage in Islam. So, the follow-up section should read “This isn't the only form of marriage that exits in Islam. Both the Muta in Shia and Misyar | I welcome all the parties that is working hard towards improving this page. Lets work together and write a more comprehensive article with strong consensus from everyone. I am going to start by explaining how I see the general structure of this section. To introduce the topic at hand, one or two sentences must be written to introduce the section, such as “The most common form of marriage in Islam is the Nikah”...(brief explanation here)”. Then the discussion should go towards making the reader be aware that this isn't the only form of marriage in Islam. So, the follow-up section should read “This isn't the only form of marriage that exits in Islam. Both the Muta in Shia and Misyar in |
" ::shit!!! o nooooooo, the white | " ::shit!!! o nooooooo, the white guy is a real, real, real, real, real, real, real, real, real, real, real, real, real, real, real, real, real, real, real, real, real, real, real, real, real, real, real, real, real, real, real, real, real, real, real, real, real, real, real, real, real, real, real, |
"== This article has a peculiarity.... == (...and had it twice before I removed the redundancy.) ""The Lydian chord has a peculiarity, in that placing the root both above and below the augmented eleventh creates an unpleasant dissonance of a tritone."" I think I get what this trying to say, but couldn't it be better said as ""doubling the root above the augmented eleventh emphasizes the dissonance of the tritone"" (which is already present, not mystically ""created"" by placing the root above the 11th)? ""The interval of the sixth is used even though it is described after other compound intervals, and perhaps should also be a compound interval (i.e., 13th).[vague] However, convention in Jazz dictates that when describing the | "== This article has a peculiarity.... == (...and had it twice before I removed the redundancy.) ""The Lydian chord has a peculiarity, in that placing the root both above and below the augmented eleventh creates an unpleasant dissonance of a tritone."" I think I get what this trying to say, but couldn't it be better said as ""doubling the root above the augmented eleventh emphasizes the dissonance of the tritone"" (which is already present, not mystically ""created"" by placing the root above the 11th)? ""The interval of the sixth is used even though it is described after other compound intervals, and perhaps should also be a compound interval (i.e., 13th).[vague] However, convention in Jazz dictates that when describing the tr |
" ::::I agree it's not obviously relevant; until we start tripping over the issue of falsifiability as we have several times recently with various editors rewriting some of that second paragraph. It is a bit of a stumbler. If, however, a consensus can be reached about how to phrase it as introductory material in a meaningful way, whatever language is chosen can be maintained with an occasional checkup on the language by the participating editors. In my figuring of it, the way it was written before was a bit clumsy and largely indefensible on the basis that we'd already said it effectively, because we hadn't quite said it effectively in that paragraph. I | " ::::I agree it's not obviously relevant; until we start tripping over the issue of falsifiability as we have several times recently with various editors rewriting some of that second paragraph. It is a bit of a stumbler. If, however, a consensus can be reached about how to phrase it as introductory material in a meaningful way, whatever language is chosen can be maintained with an occasional checkup on the language by the participating editors. In my figuring of it, the way it was written before was a bit clumsy and largely indefensible on the basis that we'd already said it effectively, because we hadn't quite said it effectively in that paragraph. I think |
== Semi-protected edit request on 1 December 2015 | == Semi-protected edit request on 1 December 2015
The following is the list of the following:
The following is the list of the following:
The following is the list of the following:
The following is the list of the following:
The following is the list of the following:
The following is the list of the following:
The following is the list of the following:
The following is the list of the following:
|
:: perhaps known to fans of college football. His media coverage in the scandal has made him much more widely known than he was before the scandal. Outside of the US no one had heard of him, and this is no longer the case. Claiming his fame before the scandal was grater than the fame he gained after the scandal is America centric jingoistic thought at it's worst. That would be the most concise argument. However, as an american, I can say that I certainly never heard of him prior to the scandal. Nor had pretty much anyone I know. I sure to american football fanatics, he is well known. Anectdotal I know, but, most of my friends, | :: perhaps known to fans of college football. His media coverage in the scandal has made him much more widely known than he was before the scandal. Outside of the US no one had heard of him, and this is no longer the case. Claiming his fame before the scandal was grater than the fame he gained after the scandal is America centric jingoistic thought at it's worst. That would be the most concise argument. However, as an american, I can say that I certainly never heard of him prior to the scandal. Nor had pretty much anyone I know. I sure to american football fanatics, he is well known. Anectdotal I know, but, most of my friends, I |
:Further - WP is not a place for WP:COMMENTARY. No one really | :Further - WP is not a place for WP:COMMENTARY. No one really knows what the problem is.
A:
I think you are correct.
The problem is that you are not able to use the WP plugin.
The WP plugin is not a WP plugin.
The WP plugin is not a WP plugin.
The WP plugin is not a WP plugin.
The WP plugin is not a WP plugin.
The WP |
And more anti-cop smears: now we're supposed to believe | And more anti-cop smears: now we're supposed to believe that the same thing is true of the same thing.
"I'm not sure if I'm right, but I'm not sure if I'm wrong."
"I'm not sure if I'm wrong."
"I'm not sure if I'm wrong."
"I'm not sure if I'm wrong."
"I'm not sure if I'm wrong."
"I'm |
The whole thing about Beth Phoenix was that, there was definitely SOMEONE from the female developmental talent group being released that day, but no one was sure who exactly that was. After Angel was confirmed, people came to the conclusion that since Beth was never brought back to the main program, they assume that she was released too, but this was never well-covered at all until Beth brought it up on her blog. I disagree with the 'not pretty enough' bit. Most of the current batch of WWE Divas arent even near the league of perfect 10's with their looks. In my opinion she is still arguably prettier then her DSW peers: Nattie, Shantelle, even Krissy. If they can | The whole thing about Beth Phoenix was that, there was definitely SOMEONE from the female developmental talent group being released that day, but no one was sure who exactly that was. After Angel was confirmed, people came to the conclusion that since Beth was never brought back to the main program, they assume that she was released too, but this was never well-covered at all until Beth brought it up on her blog. I disagree with the 'not pretty enough' bit. Most of the current batch of WWE Divas arent even near the league of perfect 10's with their looks. In my opinion she is still arguably prettier then her DSW peers: Nattie, Shantelle, even Krissy. If they can't |
== penis == penis penis pecker checker double | == penis == penis penis pecker checker double
I have a problem with the penis. I have a problem with the penis. I have a problem with the penis. I have a problem with the penis. I have a problem with the penis. I have a problem with the penis. I have a problem with the penis. I have a problem with the penis. I have a problem with the penis. I have a problem with the penis. I have a problem with the penis. |
"To user:Stlemur, the list clearly states they must have declared themselves as fascist, their roots are not relevant as for example Russia is the inheritor country for the USSR but it is not a socialist republic, and neither does it promote any communist ideology, they ditched that when they became just Russia. Please refrain from colouring information with your own political views, to do so just discredits and pollutes Wikipedia as a source of information. UKIP keep getting added in along with the BNP, national front and Britain first. The heading clearly states ""these parties have openly declared themselves as fascist"", so adding a party | "To user:Stlemur, the list clearly states they must have declared themselves as fascist, their roots are not relevant as for example Russia is the inheritor country for the USSR but it is not a socialist republic, and neither does it promote any communist ideology, they ditched that when they became just Russia. Please refrain from colouring information with your own political views, to do so just discredits and pollutes Wikipedia as a source of information. UKIP keep getting added in along with the BNP, national front and Britain first. The heading clearly states ""these parties have openly declared themselves as fascist"", so adding a party to |
" :I never heard the thing about Skwxwu7mesh winning it. It came about through the rise of the tourism industry. We used to joke that ""Squamish"" translated to ""People of the Plaque Makers"". It's quite sad really, and I find myself conflicted. See, within Kwakwaka'wakw art, you don't just do the art. Your supposed to be trained in that field to understand what you do. It's less of an art when you really get into it, as in ""expression"" and ""artists creativity"". Like, ""Oh, the sun is inspiring to do a mask like this, and maybe I'll throw this in there"". No. It would not of been like that. Certain elements or designs would be there for a reason, it was a strict | " :I never heard the thing about Skwxwu7mesh winning it. It came about through the rise of the tourism industry. We used to joke that ""Squamish"" translated to ""People of the Plaque Makers"". It's quite sad really, and I find myself conflicted. See, within Kwakwaka'wakw art, you don't just do the art. Your supposed to be trained in that field to understand what you do. It's less of an art when you really get into it, as in ""expression"" and ""artists creativity"". Like, ""Oh, the sun is inspiring to do a mask like this, and maybe I'll throw this in there"". No. It would not of been like that. Certain elements or designs would be there for a reason, it was a strict and |
Aw, look at all the wapanese. How cute. Japan could | Aw, look at all the wapanese. How cute. Japan could be.
"I'm not going to be able to get a little bit of the wapanese," he said.
"I'm not going to be able to get a little bit of the wapanese," he said.
"I'm not going to be able to get a little bit of the wapanese," he said.
"I'm not going to be able to |
== Important == You are a waste of oxygen!!!! Freaking | == Important == You are a waste of oxygen!!!! Freaking out the oxygen!
I'm not sure if this is a good idea, but I'm not sure if it's a good idea, but I'm not sure if it's a good idea, but I'm not sure if it's a good idea, but I'm not sure if it's a good idea, but I'm not sure if it's a good idea, but I'm not sure if it's a good idea |
YOUR FUCKING HOTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTT | YOUR FUCKING HOTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTT |
dude you suck, no matter how much i would | dude you suck, no matter how much i would be.
I'm not sure if you're going to be able to get a good look at the game, but I'm not sure if you're going to be able to get a good look at the game.
I'm not sure if you're going to be able to get a good look at the game, but I'm not sure if you're going to be able to get a good look at the game.
|
" Since Pussy Riot and Seuss are mentioned in the plot section, additional mention in the trivia section could be considered overcoverage... :Thanks for completing missing the point of dispute in this discussion, which has no longer has anything to do with the Pussy Riot reference. The issue was Hearfourmewesique's characterization of another editor, as my notification at 3O made explicitly clear (though apparently not explicitly enough for you). It is perfectly reasonable to discus that here, since this is where that behavior took place. If you wanted to move the discussion to another talk page, you could have. Or could've created a subheading. | " Since Pussy Riot and Seuss are mentioned in the plot section, additional mention in the trivia section could be considered overcoverage... :Thanks for completing missing the point of dispute in this discussion, which has no longer has anything to do with the Pussy Riot reference. The issue was Hearfourmewesique's characterization of another editor, as my notification at 3O made explicitly clear (though apparently not explicitly enough for you). It is perfectly reasonable to discus that here, since this is where that behavior took place. If you wanted to move the discussion to another talk page, you could have. Or could've created a subheading.
|
==GNAA article== Please reply to my comment | ==GNAA article== Please reply to my comment.
A:
The problem is that you are using the same code as the one you are using.
The code you are using is not a good way to do this.
The code you are using is not a good way to do this.
The code you are using is not a good way to do this.
The code you are using is not a good way to do this.
The code you are |
[[[[== COLLEEN IS A GAY WEIRDO!!!!!! JASLYN IS MEAN>>> | [[[[== COLLEEN IS A GAY WEIRDO!!!!!! JASLYN IS MEAN>>>
A:
I think you need to add a new line to the list of the list of the list of the list of the list of the list of the list of the list of the list of the list of the list of the list of the list of the list of the list of the list of the list of the list of the list of the list of the |
== Help batch deleting == I uploaded a large set of images using , and have some problems. At the moment my issue is a need to mass delete a set of images, wrongly named (below), but secondly other images failed to be replace-uploaded that are wrongly colored, so I wouldn't mind deleting all images in the format: File:1_22*.svg and File:2_21*.svg. Is there any way this can be done, without individually marking all the files for speedydelete? File:1 22 t0 B2.svg File:1 22 t01 B2.svg File:1 22 t1 B2.svg File:1 22 t2 B2.svg File:1 22 t3 B2.svg File:2 21 t0 B2.svg File:2 21 t01 B2.svg File:2 21 t1 B2.svg File:2 21 t2 B2.svg File:1 22 t0 B3.svg File:1 22 t01 B3.svg File:1 22 t1 B3.svg File:1 22 t2 B3.svg | == Help batch deleting == I uploaded a large set of images using, and have some problems. At the moment my issue is a need to mass delete a set of images, wrongly named (below), but secondly other images failed to be replace-uploaded that are wrongly colored, so I wouldn't mind deleting all images in the format: File:1_22*.svg and File:2_21*.svg. Is there any way this can be done, without individually marking all the files for speedydelete? File:1 22 t0 B2.svg File:1 22 t01 B2.svg File:1 22 t1 B2.svg File:1 22 t2 B2.svg File:1 22 t3 B2.svg File:2 21 t0 B2.svg File:2 21 t01 B2.svg File:2 21 t1 B2.svg File:2 21 t2 B2.svg File:1 22 t0 B3.svg File:1 22 t01 B3.svg File:1 22 t1 B3.svg File:1 22 t2 B3.svg File |
== Martha Stewart == Isn't she a convicted | == Martha Stewart == Isn't she a convicted felon?
A:
I think you're right. I think you're right. I think you're right. I think you're right.
A:
I think you're right. I think you're right. I think you're right. I think you're right.
A:
I think you're right. I think you're right. I think you |
"== Cooking cockatoo == I've heard a similar gourmet method for chub. ""Gut the fish, spread it out flat and nail it to a board. Stand the board up in front of a fire for 30 minutes. Then remove the nails, throw away the fish and eat the board"". Cheers, :For what it's worth I could probably source that. I seem to remember I read it in a ""Discover Interesting Things For Boys"" book called It's Fun Finding Out co-written by Chapman Pincher in 1950. I possibly still have a copy in the attic. Now if you could source the cockatoo recipe we'd be on for a Recipes for inedible food article for sure... == Vandalistic cockatoos in Tabasco | "== Cooking cockatoo == I've heard a similar gourmet method for chub. ""Gut the fish, spread it out flat and nail it to a board. Stand the board up in front of a fire for 30 minutes. Then remove the nails, throw away the fish and eat the board"". Cheers, :For what it's worth I could probably source that. I seem to remember I read it in a ""Discover Interesting Things For Boys"" book called It's Fun Finding Out co-written by Chapman Pincher in 1950. I possibly still have a copy in the attic. Now if you could source the cockatoo recipe we'd be on for a Recipes for inedible food article for sure... == Vandalistic cockatoos in Tabasco. |
"== ""man of Ethiopian"" (frequently cited as ""Ethiopian, but this is not what the text conveys) == Dear Robert, Welcome to Wikipedia. We're glad you've decided to join us in our campaign to make the world's largest encyclopedia also the world's most accurate. We're a collection of people from all sorts of backgrounds, working together to improve articles on a wide variety of topics. Recently, I saw your edit to the article on Philip the Evangelist, where you changed ""Ethiopian man"" to ""'man of Ethiopian'"" (frequently cited as ""Ethiopian, but this is not what the text conveys)."" I was unable to find any reason to call him ""man of Ethiopian"" instead of ""Ethiopian man,"" so I changed | "== ""man of Ethiopian"" (frequently cited as ""Ethiopian, but this is not what the text conveys) == Dear Robert, Welcome to Wikipedia. We're glad you've decided to join us in our campaign to make the world's largest encyclopedia also the world's most accurate. We're a collection of people from all sorts of backgrounds, working together to improve articles on a wide variety of topics. Recently, I saw your edit to the article on Philip the Evangelist, where you changed ""Ethiopian man"" to ""'man of Ethiopian'"" (frequently cited as ""Ethiopian, but this is not what the text conveys)."" I was unable to find any reason to call him ""man of Ethiopian"" instead of ""Ethiopian man,"" so I changed the |
Har fuckin Har. Do you think you can | Har fuckin Har. Do you think you can get away with this?
I'm not sure if I'm going to get away with this. I'm not sure if I'm going to get away with this. I'm not sure if I'm going to get away with this. I'm not sure if I'm going to get away with this. I'm not sure if I'm going to get away with this. I'm not sure if I'm going to get away with this. |
==THEfatCOMPA== Yhis motherfucker (Morrison) sucks | ==THEfatCOMPA== Yhis motherfucker (Morrison) sucks.
~~~
michael_d
I'm not sure what the answer is. I'm not sure what the answer is.
~~~
michael_d
I'm not sure what the answer is. I'm not sure what the answer is.
~~~
michael_d
I'm not sure what the answer is. I'm not sure what the answer is.
|
" :Lester, the statement, ""leaving his mother to take care of John (or ""Jack"" as he was known in the family),"" is supported by the source. Your assertion that the important part is that ""John and his mother were left to fend for themselves in this house alone"" is not even in our article and nor is it sourced to the new reference and thus your interpretation and desire for me to find a source supporting it is irrelevant. If you feel the ""Canterbury Tales"" article does not explain clearly enough the close relationship between JH and his mother, I suggest using ""What Makes Johny Run"" by Milton Cockburn or ""Rise Of A Common Man"" | " :Lester, the statement, ""leaving his mother to take care of John (or ""Jack"" as he was known in the family),"" is supported by the source. Your assertion that the important part is that ""John and his mother were left to fend for themselves in this house alone"" is not even in our article and nor is it sourced to the new reference and thus your interpretation and desire for me to find a source supporting it is irrelevant. If you feel the ""Canterbury Tales"" article does not explain clearly enough the close relationship between JH and his mother, I suggest using ""What Makes Johny Run"" by Milton Cockburn or ""Rise Of A Common Man"" by |
F**k that s**t, comrade, no one cares about the | F**k that s**t, comrade, no one cares about the world.
**A** I'm not going to say that.
**B** I'm not going to say that.
**C** I'm not going to say that.
**D** I'm not going to say that.
**E** I'm not going to say that.
**F** I'm not going to say that.
**G |
:::Usually I bite my tongue, but this was so ridiculously stupid | :::Usually I bite my tongue, but this was so ridiculously stupid. I don't know what to say, but I'm not sure what to say.
"I'm not sure what to say. I'm not sure what to say. I'm not sure what to say. I'm not sure what to say. I'm not sure what to say. I'm not sure what to say. I'm not sure what to say. I'm not sure what to say. |
" == lol...Why not let us debate? == One of the greatest things about science is conflicting ideas and theories...If everyone thought the same way, we would not have any of the technologies, that we have today...The Greeks built their entire society around education and research...and the Greeks spent a vast portion of their time debating...So my question is, ""Why not let us debate...just as long as we don't attack each other, rather than each other's beliefs."" NOTE: An example of a poor debater, is one who can not differentiate an opposing debater, from his/her opposing idealism. Suggestion: It is always unwise to attack a person directly, because they will tune out everything you say...and you cannot | " == lol...Why not let us debate? == One of the greatest things about science is conflicting ideas and theories...If everyone thought the same way, we would not have any of the technologies, that we have today...The Greeks built their entire society around education and research...and the Greeks spent a vast portion of their time debating...So my question is, ""Why not let us debate...just as long as we don't attack each other, rather than each other's beliefs."" NOTE: An example of a poor debater, is one who can not differentiate an opposing debater, from his/her opposing idealism. Suggestion: It is always unwise to attack a person directly, because they will tune out everything you say...and you cannot attack |
there dead they suk who cares ahahhahaahahah pmsfl what | there dead they suk who cares ahahhahaahahah pmsfl what they are doing, and they are not going to die.
I think the only thing that I can think of is that the people who are in the world are not going to die.
I think the only thing that I can think of is that the people who are in the world are not going to die.
I think the only thing that I can think of is that the people |