File size: 2,268 Bytes
a47fe33 ac9d30a a47fe33 ac9d30a a47fe33 c883cdc |
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 |
---
configs:
- config_name: default
data_files:
- split: train
path: data/train-*
- split: validation
path: data/validation-*
- split: test
path: data/test-*
dataset_info:
features:
- name: premise
dtype: string
- name: hypothesis
dtype: string
- name: label
dtype: string
splits:
- name: train
num_bytes: 19241020
num_examples: 16000
- name: validation
num_bytes: 2359422
num_examples: 2000
- name: test
num_bytes: 2368137
num_examples: 2000
download_size: 713871
dataset_size: 23968579
---
# Dataset Card for "LogicNLI"
```bib
@inproceedings{tian-etal-2021-diagnosing,
title = "Diagnosing the First-Order Logical Reasoning Ability Through {L}ogic{NLI}",
author = "Tian, Jidong and
Li, Yitian and
Chen, Wenqing and
Xiao, Liqiang and
He, Hao and
Jin, Yaohui",
editor = "Moens, Marie-Francine and
Huang, Xuanjing and
Specia, Lucia and
Yih, Scott Wen-tau",
booktitle = "Proceedings of the 2021 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing",
month = nov,
year = "2021",
address = "Online and Punta Cana, Dominican Republic",
publisher = "Association for Computational Linguistics",
url = "https://aclanthology.org/2021.emnlp-main.303",
doi = "10.18653/v1/2021.emnlp-main.303",
pages = "3738--3747",
abstract = "Recently, language models (LMs) have achieved significant performance on many NLU tasks, which has spurred widespread interest for their possible applications in the scientific and social area. However, LMs have faced much criticism of whether they are truly capable of reasoning in NLU. In this work, we propose a diagnostic method for first-order logic (FOL) reasoning with a new proposed benchmark, LogicNLI. LogicNLI is an NLI-style dataset that effectively disentangles the target FOL reasoning from commonsense inference and can be used to diagnose LMs from four perspectives: accuracy, robustness, generalization, and interpretability. Experiments on BERT, RoBERTa, and XLNet, have uncovered the weaknesses of these LMs on FOL reasoning, which motivates future exploration to enhance the reasoning ability.",
}
```
https://github.com/omnilabNLP/LogicNLI |