id
stringlengths 16
16
| comment_text
stringlengths 6
5k
| toxic
int64 0
1
| severe_toxic
int64 0
1
| obscene
int64 0
1
| threat
int64 0
1
| insult
int64 0
1
| identity_hate
int64 0
1
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
f9bb246c2ec5e73a | Yea, this was the first page I created (I think), and it may not be the best. I am going to try to find an appropriate page for it to be merged onto, and need some time to do this. - | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
f9bb3f6f0cfd0b59 | "
I have done the merge. (Discussion) " | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
f9bc15611b97bc6f | Hello! That's not right. This is only so, if in each place a significant proportion of the population lives there (25%) or are the majority. I was 1000 times in nordern Serbia and I have seen 100 villages and towns where only the Serbian city name exists, also in the road signs at the city entrance, so dont tell me this. On numerous road signs, in many countries of Western Europe, Germany, France, Holland, there are more minorities and whose number is much, much larger and there are the city names in German language only. Berlin, Cologne, Dusseldorf ect. I have no problem with any language, but I hope to enjoy in the frame of WP the equal rights for all, as well as justice and above all no double moral. In Vukovar I do not see that you are striving so to put Serbian-Cyrillic version in the infobox, and there ar Serbians over 25%. In Croatia, there are also other locations where Serbs and other minorities live, but their share of the total population is not so much, so I added not there the Serbian name. So it should be also in Serbia. In Novi Sad are not even 4% of Hungary, and for the city names in other languages where are the minorities of a city are not significante, we have the section name, so what ist the problem?. If the Hungarians in Novi Sad 25%, I will add the Hungarian citiy name, but they arent. In other locations thats totaly OK, becaus they are the Hungarians the majority, but in Novi Sad no. After your version every location must have 5-6 name in the infobox and the road sig ns, but forget it, I and you not thats not true, so dont tell me this, i visited the whole Balkan 100 times. In the whole World, Novi Sad is official, or do you see for Wien the Serbian city name Bec? So, accept the piecfull situation and consensus like before, wher we was agreed to put the city name of a minority language, if they have 25 % share of the total population. Please dont start this battle again, I am not the problem. Forget not one, WP does not accept double standard. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
f9bc504b9538cf34 | "
I do NOT agree to your spiking the text with random sentences taken out of context from various sources, and specifically sought out in order to slant the article in accordance with your bias. I am disgusted at your methods of seeking out the sentences that, taken out of context to various degrees, will most insinuate a connection with killings and slyly imply that the Yugoslav government deliberately incited the departure. If you were another user, I would bring out other sources and work towards a sensible representation of sourced material. This being you, however, and my having gone through that song and dance with you a dozen times to my profound annoyance and disgust, I will simply revert - and will not waste another minute of my time, which can be spent improving this project, on suppressing your campaign here through attempts at reasoning (which may not even be read or understood). You may proceed however you please, and were naturally free to do so from day one.
If you wish to open discussion on this, then I suggest you bring in others who are crazy enough to go through this. If someone else is willing to slough through this mess, then I will participate as well. Another one-on-one round with you is entirely out of the question. (talk) " | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
f9c0252cd19f5867 | Maybe you misunderstand - the pronunciation of 'X' in Spanish makes a sound like the sound a kiss makes - not the Spanish word that means 'kiss' - see onomatopoeia ?195.137.93.171 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
f9c02b7fd17fe7f1 | "
I have been pretty busy in real life and have not done anything with the Dispatch since your original note - sorry. I am OK with it as it is, but have a few ideas like adding a bit on WP:NFCC in images and a few others. If I get to them fine, if not feel free to put it in the Dispatch anyway. ><>°° " | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
f9c15a8b2898f8b7 | "
Huh? After tagging, he should have started a separate thread here on this page that editors can easily find...not a posting under a different thread topic (somewhat obscure). Rather than discuss the tagging, I would prefer that he works to improve the article. That tag is related to bringing discussion to this talk page...but he hasn't initiated a discussion that requests/requires other editors input. Where would I respond or more clearly, where's the discussion? What is being requested? " | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
f9c300047ecbba75 | 's okay, I finally got one. 雲水 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
f9c49f2389ff7377 | "
I would also like to remind you that following an editor to an article you've never edited before after getting into a content dispute with them falls under the definition of WP:STALK. I've seen editors getting indefinitely blocked for such behavior, so it would be in your best interest to stop. talk " | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
f9c589a1949bb034 | He also vandalised my userpage | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
f9c59c83ece451ac | "::Good morning to all those currently asleep. But according to the U.S. Constitution the president is not chosed until the Electoral college votes on it. Whis does not happed for the next month. This article is entitled ""List of Presidents of the United States,"" NOT ""List of President-elects of the United States"" or ""List of President and President-elects of the United States."" Go ahead and read the constitution if you don't believe me. One month to go, you never know if the president elects is going to die (somewhat like William Henry Harrison (albeit after swearing in) within weeks), or the electors get some mad spasm and vote wrongly from what is assigned. (electors have not always voted exactly as they were appointed to) At any rate, the point is, the vote for the presidency has technically not occurred yet.
" | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
f9c7ba4c4d97cea8 | Thanks!
Thanks for your creation of, contributions to, and defense of the article List of fatal dog attacks in the United States! | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
f9c97e7c1f1e8712 | Will do Niko. Thanks. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
f9cacc54183f6446 | "
pseudo-code
Isn't the psudocode quiescence_search rather wrong when looking at chess?
In chess engines implementations would say:
1) Make an evaluation of the current position (without any search!), assuming this value is save
2) Try capture moves and maybe check giving moves to look whether we can reach more. (using quiescence_search recursively)
Looking at the current ""quiete position""-idea of wikipedia you will find:
Assume you have a rather smooth position, your queen can capture a pawn, but your queen will get captured then.
We can detect ""quiet position"" only if we do that capture moves and decide ""no, that pawn-robbery was no good idea!""
If we decide ""not a quiet position"" because we can capture, we will find, that we will loose our queen.
That result would be completely wrong and implementations are not done in chess engines in that way.
You can find a chess-relevant correct description at
http://chessprogramming.wikispaces.com/Quiescence+Search
Benno (13.8.2010)" | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
f9cb2353128962f2 | What, in RE4? It's an attaché case.86.44.206.166 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
f9cda1c4cd9e57e6 | Great. I will do what you are saying. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
f9cdcf9fd0171ca5 | Well Hey There How are you | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
f9ce6e3773f57cf4 | "
The grammar has been updated
I took the time to update the grammar and rearrange some of the sentence structure. One person took the time to point out a ""General Discussion"" web forum that is definitely not official, but I did not delete that information, like I probably should have. Instead, I simply pointed out that Midway's highest ranking authoritytheir CEOhas officially confirmed that Midway will Publish Unreal Tournament 2007 for the Xbox 360. Although Epic currently does not acknowledge that they are developing an Xbox 360 version of Unreal Tournament 2007, that definitely does not prevent Midway from Publishing the game for the Xbox 360.
Midway could easily develop the game for the Xbox 360 on their own, or they could outsource the development to another developer. Let's not forget that the PC is the primary development platform for Unreal Tournament 2007. Midway or an outsourced developer could easily port the game to the Xbox 360 because the Xbox 360 is so easy to program games for, since it is so similar to the PC. However, the Playstation 3 is very difficult to develop games for, and it likely requires skilled developers such as Epic to work on both the PC and PS3 versions at the same time. Nevertheless, the bottom line is that Midway CEO David Zucker has made it 100% clear that Midway will Publish Unreal Tournament 2007 for the Xbox 360, regardless of who the Developer of the game is. " | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
f9d228aaa7322538 | PatrickFlaherty reverted my post 3 TIMES today. DID YOU BLOCK HIM? | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
f9d2e868a6078d62 | any notes on steamboats on the N sask? | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
f9d4bbc2f89618ab | HELLO. YES THIS IS PILIF. Pilif12p | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
f9d7148aabf0532b | "
Arbitration enforcement action appeal by Ivan Štambuk
Procedural notes: The rules governing arbitration enforcement appeals are found here. According to the procedures, a ""clear, substantial, and active consensus of uninvolved editors"" is required to overturn an arbitration enforcement action. To help determine any such consensus, involved editors may make brief statements in separate sections but should not edit the section for discussion among uninvolved editors. Editors are normally considered involved if they are in a current dispute with the sanctioning or sanctioned editor, or have taken part in disputes (if any) related to the contested enforcement action. Administrators having taken administrative actions are not normally considered involved for this reason alone (see WP:UNINVOLVED).
Appealing user –
Sanction being appealed
Administrator imposing the sanction
Notification of that administrator The appealing editor is asked to notify the administrator who made the enforcement action of this appeal, and then to replace this text with a diff of that notification. The appeal may not be processed otherwise. If a block is appealed, the editor moving the appeal to this board should make the notification.
Statement by Ivan Štambuk
see the unblock request
Statement by Sandstein
Statement by (involved editor 1)
Statement by (involved editor 2)
Discussion among uninvolved editors about the appeal by Ivan Štambuk
Result of the appeal by Ivan Štambuk
This section is to be edited only by uninvolved administrators. Comments by others will be moved to the sections above.
" | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
f9d7be242727be66 | I appreciate your feedback Rob, thanks for the heads up. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
f9d80dea8116433b | Nice rant there from a Yank with a North American bias, the article had actually been named Mega Drive longer than it has been named Sega Genesis so by your fail logic, you fail94.172.127.37 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
f9d85e48aa2b23e1 | Created my first article.
Hello my old nemisis. I created my first article today wanted to stop by see if you could take a look tell me what you think. Central High School (Pueblo, Colorado) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
f9d889973edacdde | "
Cumberland Bridges
Cake, where did you get this: ""father of modern football at the University."" I can assure you, you would have a hard time finding anyone associated with the University of Florida that even recognizes Marvin Bridges' name (at least who hasn't read an obscure 1974 book about Florida football by Tom McEwen, the late sports columnist and editor for The Tampa Tribune). Because Bridges' one-season coaching tenure predates the 1905 Buckman Act merger that created the modern University of Florida, they don't even acknowledge this guy ever existed. It's almost like 1930s Soviet Russia the way this guy got purged from history. I guess that's what happens when you go 0–5, whether you play in Lake City or you play in Gainesville, some things never change. LOL " | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
f9d9ff5f829fba6d | picture
does anyone have a picture of John Mosely Turner to down load. unable to find a picture anywhere. (PershingBoy)209.247.22.75 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
f9daf4efd64d6c31 | Need some help
continues to make personal attacks, I need some help, I'm not sure what to do. (talk to me) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
f9daf9bac425699b | "Carl_Paladino&diff;=388097440&oldid;=388080941 October 1], and again on October 2. On Linda McMahon, you have a long history of editing and edit warring on the page, and probably would have been blocked if Malinaccier hadn't protected the page on September 17; your October 1 and October 2 edits are inadvisable due to your history on that page, but I'm not really concerned with those since the things you reverted are borderline vandalism. Therefore the main motivation for the current block was your final edit to Carl Paladino. ♦ ♣ ♠
I'm not sure I buy two reverts in two days as disruptive edit warring. Moreover, the combination of low speed and non-explicit warnings are concerning. Certainly, the articles in question attract people writing for differing political agendas, but I'm not aware of any specific sanctions/enforcement which apply to these articles at the moment.
Sir - my ""history of edit warring"" was basically two years ago. 20 total edits on a page [Linda McMahon]] which another editor has over 800 edits does not seem to me to show anything near an edit war. So I am surprised to see your rationale is the Carl Paladino page! is a legitimate edit, and not actionable at all. is also proper, and a day earlier. I have a grand total of 28 edits on that page, or an average or just over an edit a day also removing clear vandalism as well). But you blocked me without any indication of my crime, and were absent for quite a while - leaving me in limbo. Frankly, 72 hours for a person who has no recent edit war problems seems extreme. And for this use of block as punishment - I have doubts as to propriety thereof. Did you block because Ohiostandard kept asserting that I was edit warring? AFAICT, he never even posted a single diff for his charge. Thank you - now can I be unblocked so I can resume normal editing? My radiation treatment limits my activities quite a bit. Oh - look at this sort of ""editor"" I have had to face at , and a favorite example to show the kind of edits I reverted on the article.
This looks like a bad block, and even worse when I read the explaination from the admin. Is there any ""history/involvement"" per say with the blocking admin?
WRT asserting that Ohiostandard 'warned me"" - he never edited on the Paladino article, nor mentioned it to me. Right now the block is clearly punitive, and I respectfully request it be removed with a note that it was not ""edit war"" on my part. I do not see the point in having a clear record for nearly two years - and then being blocked for a 1RR because someone ""thinks"" I must be watched! The only connection I have with Ohiostandard is that he did not like my post about Screwball23.
Examples of current edits from others . And of course the current content of "" Content of the emails in question includes video of dancing African tribesmen under the title ""Obama Inauguration Rehearsal"", a video titled ""Miss France 2008 Fucking"", an altered image of President Obama and First Lady Michelle Obama dressed as a pimp and a prostitute, an image of a cargo plane landing in an African desert behind a group of panicked men titled ""Run, Niggers, Run!"" and a video portraying a woman engaged in copulation with a horse. For some odd reason, I had thought this was actually improper on WP. I take it that I was wrong if reverting such edits is ""edit war.""
precipitating edit
[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=" | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
f9db1ed035c00b25 | "
Line-ups
And when you create these line-up files PLEASE upload them to Commons, not Wikipedia. → talk • contribs • " | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
f9db8456b23eff17 | "
JzG, as deeply offended and appalled as I am at the vulgar phrase with which you characterized me on ANI, your placement of a false charge - ""harassment"" - in my block log is intolerable.
" | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
f9dbc90c21196d19 | " 2009 (UTC)
I prefer the one list, with the color codes. 19:10, 30 June" | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
f9dbca7723f02b61 | "
Arbitrary break for my reply
but if we really can't say that with our own experience from watching the show then we should remove the rest of ""such and such is based off of the character such and such from the original version"" (at least for every character but the main three, maybe)
You're totally right with this, and I hadn't noticed that this was noted for other characters. For now we should pull it. But I think eventually we'll see reviews and interviews noting the comparisons we've made. But unfortunately, per the original research policy we can't make those statements based on our own observations. It's really frustrating sometime when something is so obvious but it prevents more problems than it causes. Keeping the main three shouldn't be an issue; the show runners have talked about the one-to-one comparison to their UK counterparts in interviews. It's something I've been meaning to go looking for (the articles where they've talked about how they are similar and different from the originals) but haven't had a chance to do yet. This sort of thing is always an issue on list of character articles - they tend to get updated with plot summary and very little else. But as the show progresses there will be more material to drop in so that the article isn't so in-universe and has more real world info.
But would you still remove my edits if I added that information to the casting section?
If we can find the links to back up the comparisons, absolutely not. I think it will be great info to provide once we have our sources. It's exactly the kind of thhing I mean by real world info (casting the roles, how they are changed from originals by creators, how actors interpret the scenes and characters).
Actually what I gave in my first reply wasn't plot summaries, but character summaries.
That was actually a reference to an edit that came after yours. Someone added waaay too much plot detail in there and I was reverting past two people's edits. Since the lines for our edit summaries are so short, I find it hard to be clear about that sometimes.
And while unsourced original research, it was from my experience of watching every season and episode of the UK show so far and doing the same pretty much with the American one. I hate things like this where it's true but you have a hard time finding something that confirms it's true due to Wikipedia's standards.
I know exactly what you mean. It drives me bonkers sometimes. I like to drove myself nuts last year looking for this little bit I remembered from an interview about an actor on True Blood. But it really does prevent more problems than it causes. Imagine if every person who had an off the wall interpretation of a scene came in and said ""well this bit reminded me of this thing in another thing so clearly the other thing was an inspiration.""
No need to make this personal. But if I really did come across that way I'm sorry, because I didn't mean to.
Not personal at all; no worries. I just figured you undid before you saw my reply to you here. My edit summary probably seemed more blunt than I meant it because, again, trying to explain the reversion of more than one edit. And I do waaay too much recent changes patrolling which seems to lead to a severe truncating of verbage in edit summaries. I probably seem like a stark raving butthead half the time when I'm just trying to be brief. I think you have great instincts about the type of stuff we'll want to include on the article. We just have to find the articles to back up the info. There's not going to be a lot out there yet because it's the first season but it'll be awesome if we can start getting the article overhauled with this kind of stuff right away. I follow the UK version's article and a few other list of character articles that have been going on for years with just updates to plot summary and no real world stuff. So now it's particularly overwhelming a thought to try and fix them. The True Blood characters page is my personal nightmare. I'll get around to it?
One thing I've been looking for is an article I read just before the premiere that talked about changes made to the three main characters. I vaguely recall that it had some quotes from the writers and a couple of the actors (I think Witwer mentioned something about watching the UK version). I can't seem to dig up the link from the message boards where I read about the show though. Ack." | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
f9dc92164b09b274 | Ok, I never knew that, never considered the gravity time dilation. Time dilation introduced stresses? I will have to think about that. Is this the same or similar to saying the effective gravity force (i.e. Newtonian - minus the centrifugal force) is the same everywhere on the Earth's surface? Because the Earth deforms until this condition is met. And it follows from this that the clock rates are the same everywhere? | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
f9df5ee448615797 | Your questions on the Science ref desk
Your questions about urban search and rescue, etc. on the Science ref desk beg this question: Are you a disaster novelist, like me? 24.5.122.13 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
f9e02352e543dd56 | Wow, that's embarrassing... I'm quite sorry about that. I guess that's what you get when you're lazy and you copy a part of a message. The message was actually to you. Sorry, . | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
f9e1370bfb7aa193 | Whereas Christ apparently went around preforming miracles that persuaded people to follow him, all muhammed did was make up a divine revelation whenever he wanted something (be it power, land, money, more wives, etc) that would justify in his followers eyes anything he did on a moral, ethical and spiritual basis. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
f9e1afb7f7260cbe | "::::::::Yes, this article is pretty short, & little of it exclusive to Arabic language calligraphy. Copy rather than ""transfer"".
" | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
f9e4504567b1057a | nevermind the last post...i knew i had read it before coz i wrote it >< I feel so dumb! | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
f9e84d79d343f61a | (recently vandalized articles were metric (mathematics) and Holidays of Japan and Turban) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
f9edccf0360ae4ea | Note on Edit Wars
It has come to my attention that some Wikipedians try to drag me into fighting on edit wars on their behalf (for example, by asking me to revert their opponent's edits). I prefer to stay out of this. I'm just here to make Wikipedia a better place. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
f9eec5f77fa35106 | Said - Editor - Patagonia Media | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
f9ef0f2ada2c3c81 | Sorry, that's just more of Svensmark's nonsense already dismissed above with this. -BC aka | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
f9efe37ee8b44b73 | Remember remember, the fifth of your mother
The truth is on to you, neocon scum! You are being tracked and watched! You will be brought to light! Viva la revolución! | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
f9effac17cb5d317 | "
My Reverting of The Edit In The History Section
I didn't revert the edit because the material you removed isn't redundant in some ways, which is fairly obvious if you read the section as a whole. The entire history section of this article is still in very bad shape in my opinion, I'd suggest that its got non NPOV issues in several spots, the tone it's written in and choice of words seem somewhat ""chatty"" and unencyclopedic to me and worst of all it continues to contain, what I'd argue, are historical inaccuracies in some places. Instead of editing out the paragraph that was removed today, which contained a link to a map, as well as an internal link to the ongoing Caledonia land dispute, a subject quite relevant in the Grand Valley these days, I'd like to see the entire history section itself brought up to a higher standard. In my opinion, from a historical perspective, the article itself would benefit more if some of the earlier comments in it regarding the acquisition of the land by the Six Nations were edited out and replaced by the material that was removed today. As I said back in August, I'm willing to work on this article myself as time allows, but in my opinion it doesn't make sense removing content that's not only relevant and contains references, it's actually of a higher quality than what remains.
" | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
f9f1a15c49d21b53 | "
I don't care who the other person is or what they said. Your personal attacks are not acceptable. Additionally, you've used the word ""censuring"" in a way that implies you do not understand its meaning. Finally, as you are attempting to influence others with your posting, you are engaged in propaganda.) -
AN/I
" | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
f9f246307f1f70b0 | so 3 reverts is allowed but 4 reverts isnt? am i allowed to edit if its not a revert? | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
f9f28308aaf3c7f0 | Re:FGWQPR
You mention that I launched a personal attack on The Islander. Well I beleive he/she, yes an administrator launched a personal attack on me. Here Talk: First Great Western where he said I work for FGW as PR when I don't I like trains, use FGW and support Queen's Park Rangers Football Club. This was condsidered a personal attack by me. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
f9f313574cdc0b7e | Ren Hoek and Robin Hood
To say Ren Hoek is a play on Robin Hood, you need a source that says that. Without a source, I removed what you put in. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
f9f375f1f78cc9d9 | Lists that combine categories
On the AfD for List of Jewish American criminals and victims you wrote Comment Does anyone think that this sort of list is substantially different from List of Jewish actors and actresses? If so, I'd like to understand exactly why.
I don't know if you're aware that in January 06 there was extensive discussion of the issue of lists that try and combine a person's ethnic or religious affiliation with something completely unrelated to that. The extreme example discussed at some length there was List of Methodist dentists. I missed that discussion, but having looked through it recently as I've watch the AfD comments I'm really disappointed that the community did not come to an acceptable consensus on the question.
I see a difference between the list you cite and the list under discussion primarily because the 'criminals and victims' is so contentious and potentially offensive. We've seen the comments from User: GorillazFanAdam. While I can see some way in which a list of people who were victims because they were Jewish (gay, missionaries) could have merit (but I'm not sure it warrants inclusion on Wikipedia), I cannot see how a list of criminals could have the same merit. To act in a manner that is criminal is effectively a declaration that the faith into which you were born, or claim by conversion, is effectively a sham. So I am against the list of criminals and victims remaining not only because it not doing anything of value in the context of an encyclopedia but because it is potentially offensive.
As for the list of actors, I am against their creation since they do not seem to have encyclopedic value. Such a list combines two aspects of a person's life that do not inherently have value. A list of Jewish scholars of Christianity, for example, might be a very interesting list. There is a category combination that i see has genuine value. It was said that a List of Islamicist athletes has values because such athletes choose to recognise aspects of the Koran in the way that they compete (women wearing a burka [spelling?] for example).
So I've come to the position that both lists you mention are unencyclopedic, but was willing to accept the view of a majority that a List of Jewish actors and actresses was something I can put up with. A List of Jewish American criminals and victims is too contentious to remain. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
f9f4496bcad8efad | Link
About the link, why do you not take a look at this. This is why I told you that there are two types of seating capacity. In the main page, it is stated states that there are 240 seats (rounded up from 239), and only in the cabin layout page it is stated there are 261 seats. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
f9f4c00af190f87f | Just deleted my own edit and the reliable source I had added, to deflate any unnecessary tension, but am left pretty confused and battered here? | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
f9f695804c7c586a | you behaves as though () | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
f9f7081efc149861 | I'm blocked from touching it, I placed the maintenance tag that stated it was a new page and the tag clearly states to give it a couple of weeks, do I need to be a lawyer to get anything done without interference. Check monster.com look up OSP. I think I am being scrutinized unfairly, I wish to take up Wildthing on his offer to help because all anybody else is doing is in my book harassment. ( ) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
f9f87b82169d9666 | "
Again, the Dom -> Rom theory is based on a supposed name connection (while there are plenty of such possibilities of connections with words from the Subcontinent) and on a supposed connection between Domba's low status and the anti-Romani prejudices. Scientifc studies presented reasons for its' lack of substance and for the Rajput ancestry. Some supporters of Dom -> Rom reorganized later their theory, by including the points raised against its likeliness, by presenting the Ḍom as a cover-term for itinerant service-providing castes and the three group as originating in different areas within India, speaking different (albeit related) Indian languages, and probably leaving the Subcontinent at different times, taking different routes. It is too bad for Y. Matras dismissing, as always, the scientific approach as ""fantastic politically-inspired mythology"" and his opinion based on a mere resemblance of prejudices as the mainstream. I presented the evolution in time of the two theories, but I see that he deleted most of the scientific results (which btw inspired later the supporters of Dom -> Rom to make some adjustments in order to keep looking reliable). The Wikipedia is based on consensus, so you can't have your separate page (try it on your userpage). Also I'm giving you a warning for breaching WP:3RR. Next time you will revert in 24h it will be likely to receive a block. And I want to point out the presumptuos style of addresing of this user. " | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
f9f8a1252584cf04 | "
Thank you.
I've posted an Associated Press article that appeared on the news wires today, on the discussion page for nitrites.
The article validates my concerns about Wikipedia. I imagine you'll edit it out, or delete it.
I suspect that the general public 'gets it' about Wikipedia, too.
It's regrettable that the folks who are the most knowledgeable about, and best able to use, the intracacies of Wikipedia's rules and regulations are also the people best equipted to use that knowlege to stifle newbies, and/or those who are less computer-savvy, who may make mistakes, or who haven't even yet heard about what a 'sock puppet' is, or RR32 rule, or whatever rules you and heah used to stifle my contributons.
I doubt you'll 'get it', nor do I care. But, at the end of the day, just maybe there's a chance that you'll actually understand the damage you do by your holier-than-thou attitudes, and arrogant computer-geek power-plays.
This is in no way meant to be a personal attack"" on you or heah, or anyone else who edits in Wikipedia. It's simply the reaction of an ordinary guy, based on his observations and experiences after being stifled by those who dissagreed with his edits. You and heah, in addition to not agreeing with my edits, clearly have the superiour knowledge of how Wikipedia works, which made it easy for you to throw down obstables to my postings, make false allegations of wrong doing, and activate Wikipedia's rules to either threaten to ban me or block me, or as you did, to actually ban or block me.
But the more important issue and problem is for Wikipedia itself; namely, that this kind of censorship is akin to the autoritarion rulers whose people are only allowed to see or read whatever the rulers deem suitable which will, as I've said before, only serve to further diminish the already tarnished reputaton of Wikipedia.
" | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
f9fa2308fda3ba2e | Wikipedia Abuse on
Consider the following:
1. http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User%3AEth01&diff;=185942737&oldid;=185043611
2. http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User%3AEth01&diff;=185942737&oldid;=185043924
3. http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User%3AEth01&diff;=185942737&oldid;=185677629
Those are just some... More available here, http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:Eth01&action;=history ...
I have reason to believe that you are the instigator for the above, and created the such. There are however, two sides to every story, consider citing Sadie from freenode... | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
f9fcbc7bd276c121 | This appears to have it, It sure announces itself as that, though I might be deceived: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dTfX_JDank8 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
f9fd15c95aadb286 | How is it point of view? its a fact! Rhino did beat up Daniels with a chair, did you not see the match Jay316 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
f9fd429cf00fc2f9 | "
That's my point! It's exactly the same as an MPA, so why exclude it from the MPA article? More specifically, the original author added the line (paraphrased), ""Some universities call their programs XYZ, but they are still MPA's."" A&M; calls their's an MPSA. If Wikipedia is intended to capture knowledge about a topic, in this case the MPA, and one of the subjects noted in the article is other names by which the MPA is known and/or closely related degrees, I fail to see how not including that information would be a responsible thing to do. The article is incomplete at that point.
As for the ""promoting"" argument, if another school called their program the MPSA, then we could easily say ""...while other universities refer to their programs as an MPSA."" But, A&M; is the only one that does that to my knowledge, so it would be awkward not to refer to them by name. That would be like saying 14 nations on the UN Security Council voted for something, but one didn't, and we're not going to tell you which one it is because we don't want to show favortism toward that country.
I see three choices. Either add Texas A&M; as an outlier that refers to their MPA as the MPSA (using neutral language like I did originally), or strike the entire sentence about what some universities call their degrees. The former is the most thorough course of action, while the latter is specifically and intentionally deleting information that is relevant to the discussion, or do nothing, in which case the article is still incomplete. I'll let you decide which to go with." | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
f9fd4518203b89a2 | I disagree, octet is the correct and accurate term, byte can be ambiguous. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
f9fd6c9f0a54b3e9 | "
No need to justify yourself
""Panda"" acted like a paltry garden-variety bully and you were spot-on in your first message. Wording is everything and he chose the worst way to express himself. But more importantly, he paid more attention to my ""edit warring"" and to reasserting his authority than to the actions of a severely biased fellow wiki user who had used the Admin Noticeboard as a weapon rather than as an instrument.
It is people like ""Panda"" or ""Lucy1994"" who make Wikipedia such an unsatisfactory experience overall. At least intellectually. " | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
f9fd70fec05ebda9 | But just won't stop destroying several entertainment company articles. All he does is remove useful/accurate information, erasing owner/parent company lists in infoboxes, butchering the formatting, and renaming sections to used company names, so HE'S the one who's a vandal. Why don't you block him before it's too late? 68.98.224.182 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
fa02005a9437044c | However, since SCIMD-COM is just a branch campus and not a separate, self-standing UK educational entity it is covered under the recognition of it's parent university. SCIMD-COM does not need to be recognized by the UK government since it is not a UK educational institution. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
fa02189a0b320bb0 | "::::::::How many articles are we talking about? Examples? Also if people can get away with (required reading) I don't think you'll have much to worry about. 303
" | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
fa026e35213a4fbd | "
has eaten your ! The cookie made them happy and they'd like to give you a great big hug for donating it. Spread the WikiLove by giving out more s, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Thanks again!
Spread the goodness of cookies by adding to someone's talk page with a friendly message, or eat a cookie with !
" | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
fa03ebeaf06bb8f6 | "
I have looked over the history of the page and at some times vandalism accounts for over 70% of contributions. So it isn't a case of might get vandalised but is getting vandalised all the time. At this stage I dread to think how many names on there legally could sue the posters over their inclusion. A quick glance spotted a couple. Robbie Williams, for example, has just won a defamation case yet we still had him in as debated when legally it has been ruled that there is nothing debatable about his orientation!!! Frankly, given the legal complexities with listing people here I'd go further and advocate that either the page be deleted as too much of a defamation risk, or be kept semi-protected to stop the constant adding in of vandalistic edits by anonymous editors who edit no pages but this one. It might be an idea to protect the page completely for a day while a couple of users sifted through all the names on it to make sure that there are no defamationary claims sitting there that weren't spotted by those honorable editors like Bearcat who spent their time constantly stopping vandalism here. But as vandalism is a constant reality, not merely a theoretical possibility, I think semi-protection is allowable here. \(caint) " | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
fa04c178ed7bf874 | "
Unspecified source for Image:Lieu_gen.png
Thanks for uploading Image:Lieu_gen.png. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.
As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following [ this link]. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after . If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. — '''''' | =/\= | " | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
fa061aaad0bc6999 | please delete all duplication below and merge with above summary (thanks) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
fa0668f5cb32bf13 | Could you please restore the talk page history as well?
I'm referring to Talk:Hold 'Em (Windows), of course. I did mention that I would like this history restored as well in my original request. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
fa06c917522288a5 | Sigh*
So you just went ahead and removed them anyway, why are they on other pages like WW1 vets and the world cup, Anyway forget it;
You know what i dont even care anymore. Do your worst. Goodbye ive had enough. Im not even going to explain everything to you. | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
fa07e591ecc021ee | comment request
Hi there, would you be so kind as to provide an indepenant neutral opinion of the image Construccionkaiserrick.jpg at the section of the same name on the talk page of Richmond Medical Center here please? Thank you very much as this may help to alleviate a current debate over its inclusion.CholgatalK! | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
fa0c2acabfe54161 | "
Question about YouTube screenshots
Hi there Diana,
I wonder if you could take a look at this, and see whether my screenshot of Lester Grinspoon could be licensed in a similar way? tc " | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
fa0c7939833be193 | "
Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to Mooncake. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. – scent " | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
fa0d578f1e122878 | Are you gay?
or are you just trying real hard? | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
fa0dac18b90777b3 | "
Benon, thanks for your ""interference"" here, it was welcome. I have begun some copyedit of Enemies of Batman, although at times it is hard to make out what T-Man is trying to say. I will try to keep the framework of the current concept, though, and have filled in years of first appearances where missing. " | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
fa109df40eb4c121 | I have to say I'm in favor of the merge. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
fa10c0fc5ba6217b | You should look up the definition of vansalism that you quote. You will see that an honest attempt to improve an article by including true but controversial statements does not constitute vandalism. In fact your revert of my edit on strategy is far closer to vandalism. The coaching staff has made it painfully clear to even the casual observer that cheating is part of their strategy. As for the edit to the discussion of the Pat's article, isn't that the purpose of the discussion. If you don't address the continual cheating by the Pats, then you are not being honest and complete and are not following the Wikipedia rules. I'll look up the exact reference if you want! 71.99.139.118 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
fa122742267c4e08 | What weight of opinion? Your opinion has no weight! You have not explained yourself in the slightest! You made edits that don't make any sense and they are non-neutral. You clearly have a Conflict of Interest! (Oh, and John Nagle is delusional and Bus stop agrees with me.) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
fa14c9d4219f1c6f | Eejit
He's an awful eejit. Could some writer-type person please say that? Much appreciated. 86.42.90.145 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
fa16306214ac27dd | Just a bunch of 2 inch gay fuckers slapping each other on the backs for being cocksmoking losers | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
fa197c0dbd6580e1 | "
Thanks Hahc. I'll start on it tomorrow. Don't ever worry about the time it takes. We both have busy lives and there is no rush. My plan is to take my time so that it really sinks in and I understand it. TRA! ``` Talk " | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
fa19c33734380830 | "... and the ""example"", IMHO" | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
fa19e779a11f486d | "
Hmmmmm? Sounds like discrimination there? Will you be deleted? (and that's been offered before here) That's just my point, could I get a lawyer to sue you? No. But you could get one in vice versa. Liberals just want to use the system to steal and kill by unfair rules and lies. True criminals. If Wiki had not written liberal lies about me I would not have been here. It all is summed up as this: Give me a fair reason for ""liberalism"". It has never been forwarded, so go home and stop the insanity." | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
fa1a541ef69aeaf8 | Oh, for goodness SAKES!! This guys other sockpuppets have been blocked without question. It's been blatantly OBVIOUS they are sockpuppets! Why are you being so difficult? LOOK at those IPs TALK pages, or their HISTORY, and you'll SEE. 88.109.31.145 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
fa2021fc049f0330 | "
Hi Biancaleto, and Welcome to Wikipedia!
Welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you enjoy the encyclopedia and want to stay. As a first step, you may wish to read the Introduction.
If you have any questions, feel free to ask me at my talk page — I'm happy to help. Or, you can ask your question at the New contributors' help page.
Here are some more resources to help you as you explore and contribute to the world's largest encyclopedia...
Finding your way around:
Table of Contents
Department directory
Need help?
Questions — a guide on where to ask questions.
Cheatsheet — quick reference on Wikipedia's mark-up codes.
Wikipedia's 5 pillars — an overview of Wikipedia's foundations
The Simplified Ruleset — a summary of Wikipedia's most important rules.
How you can help:
Contributing to Wikipedia — a guide on how you can help.
Community Portal — Wikipedia's hub of activity.
Additional tips...
Please sign your messages on talk pages with four tildes (~~~~). This will automatically insert your ""signature"" (your username and a date stamp). The button, on the tool bar above Wikipedia's text editing window, also does this.
If you would like to play around with your new Wiki skills the Sandbox is for you.
Good luck, and have fun. " | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
fa2144080174fde9 | A tag has been placed on G. Narayanan Nair, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:
non-notable person
Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet very basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as an appropriate article, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is appropriate, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add on the top of the page and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.
For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
fa23f4b712508b6b | Appearances
Someone changed the trivia that Hiro is one of two characters to be in every episode to three, the other being Mr. Bennet. I don't believe this is true, and if it is, it's not on the other's pages. It also doesn't validate much, it's cool but that's it. Why don't we say that Hiro is the only one to be portrayed by three actors for Young Hiro, Present Hiro, and Future Hiro? None of it really seems to matter. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
fa24c53b12e88e0b | "
The problem being, my friend, that you are not a specialist in that field, and have been posting for over a month in YBM's private forums, and are a very big fan and socket puppet of his.
The second problem being that your extensiv scientifical ""evidencies"", well supplied above, contain absolutly nothing who don't have been mentioned, and I should say ""supposed"", earlier, already at the beginning of 2004, and abundently refutated since, and that all those counterproofs dismantled all the attacks from the scientifical part of the accusators, and that it was then agreed that it was more a question of specialisation differences than of direct misunderstanding of existing theories, or gross ignorancies of basic physic.
Thats what make Cosmology a specific part of advance physic.
Your field being not Cosmology nor Higher physic nor Theoretical Physic, it will have been better if you had first consulted with a ""collegue"" from the department of Theoretic Physic, before you posted here, or even before you made up your opinion about the Bogdanovs work.
You made already plenty of that kind of mistakes also in the french wiki about this case, and no, we are not impress at your ability to repeat yourself and others statements without correction alredy brought by other scientifics.
Links:
http://groups.google.fr/group/sci.physics.research/msg/6cd4ff740c84b2c
http://groups.google.com/group/fr.sci.astrophysique/msg/8a71f677ceb92c50?hl=en&
http://groups.google.com/group/fr.sci.physique/browse_thread/thread/4fa2fdfa624f6722/669c56784faf5681?lnk=st&q;=Sur+quelques+erreurs+de+YBM&rnum;=1&hl;=en
http://groups.google.com/group/fr.sci.physique/msg/669c56784faf5681?hl=en
http://perso.wanadoo.fr/fabien.besnard/bogdanoff.htm
http://groups.google.com/group/fr.sci.physique/tree/browse_frm/thread/8a5253c3c7ab5ae4/c737b21c1f305c84?utoken=F4NLBDIAAAD-55KQrAqsvC7XQgbM6O-8ww-I-AULMJ-v880tKl4IqgYWfkOF69nRg2MTU_ZlqDxkSG9p011IxMJMvLoSwglF&hl;=en&rnum;=141
http://groups.google.com/group/fr.sci.physique/tree/browse_frm/thread/8a5253c3c7ab5ae4/3201c2e5eac45c09?rnum=121&hl;=en&_done=%2Fgroup%2Ffr.sci.physique%2Fbrowse_frm%2Fthread%2F8a5253c3c7ab5ae4%2F5dd4af0aaf79502a%3Fhl%3Den%26lr%3D%26ie%3DUTF-8%26rnum%3D1%26prev%3D%2F%26frame%3Don%26
http://groups.google.com/group/fr.sci.physique/browse_thread/thread/8a5253c3c7ab5ae4/540ff3bd08f120ca?lnk=st&q;=&rnum;=2&hl;=en&utoken;=ovx8CzIAAAD-55KQrAqsvC7XQgbM6O-8ww-I-AULMJ-v880tKl4IqqEI81y7bnl3NrQIcGjIQcJU6ZMHNcY-sKSigexB1LaK
" | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
fa251ec9317c96e8 | January 2015 (UTC)
It's taken care of, thank you for checking. 02:59, 9 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
fa260859bb9bc53e | "
I'd like to see this stated. ""SQL... often (erroneously)[2] referred to as Structured Query Language..."" made me think ""So what does it stand for?"" Since I don't have the book that is source #2, can you quote it here, or make the edit? — " | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
fa26197f1e7e328b | IconCMO]]Church Management Software by - Icon Systems, Inc.
| Icon Systems, Inc.
http://www.iconcmo.com
| Web-based
| Proprietary closed-source
| Works on any computer with a web browser
|
|
| Download Pricing IconCMO- Church Management Software Pricing
| Extremely easy to use and learn
| FAQ and User Guide for users
| Free Webinar training
| Unlimited live support via Phone, Email and Online Database support Free support - Icon Systems, Inc.
|-
! [[ | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
fa2652d3b8a5ca39 | Question
Ira, I have a question for you. Well, two actually. When Jimmy bеnds over so that you can kiss his aṣṣ, does he mind when you slip your tongue into his аṣṣhole? And what does it taste like? 115.28.1.104 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
fa2688e9c6b38f9c | Flag/Seal of Dallas, Texas
Here you go! | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
fa29262dfadb5c52 | "
The subject homophobia and the definition of the term homophobia are not the same thing. The subject of homophobia is (in short) the fear or hatred of gays, or discrimination or prejudice against them. The AFA is a recognized part of a body of groups, people, and ideas that define modern-day homophobia. There's no way you can deny that, even if you believe that the label is undeserved, that the label could be pejorative in a non-encyclopedic context, or that somehow being categorized under ""homophobia"" and being an organization somehow equates to being categorized as ""homophobic organization."" The categories ""homophobic organization"" and ""homophobe"" were deleted because they are, grammatically, constructed to specifically modify or describe the subject in question. ""Homophobia"" is not, and these false analogies may make it seem like we're out go get the AFA, but we aren't. Although Sam seems to think it's an irrelevant personal comment, it is the case, Hal, that since you got here, you've been arguing that the AFA's opinion of itself should more of a part of the article, and that criticism should not be. Miles have been spun about how much of a big deal this is, that we're gay activists, that we're creating attack articles, that the category homophobia is a pejorative attack on whatever it labels. Now, Sam, I know you'll insist on removing this part of my comment (editing/censoring others' comments is a practice that is, by the way, fairly dubious). But remember that we are supposed to discuss the issue at hand, not the character of others - I'm not attacking Hal's character. But his history of editing for the sake of the AFA is completely relevant to this discussion and a part of the issue at hand - it explains why he believes we've constructed an attack article (hardly), why the category is a pejorative attack or accusation (clearly not), and why it must be eventually removed. I agree with Hal: it could be taken as a pejorative, and what concerns me is that it is, but only (as far as I can tell) by someone who's made it clear that portraying the AFA in a positive light is very important (no matter [[WP:UNDUE|what that entails). " | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
fa2aeea3a8bf9f56 | without being resupplied were Panzerschiffe's | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
fa2c5bf3f0570d88 | "
Rick Ross
You semi-protected the Ross article. I don't have a problem with that as there had been quite a bit of blood shed in editing the article. However, you restored to the ""last good version"", undoing quite a bit of good work to the article, including my own (triggered by a post at BLPN). At the point that you protected it, I'm not sure what you (or others?) think was wrong with the article. Is there any reason why you can't undo your restoration, which would put it in the state it was in at the point of semi-protection? Thanks for looking at this. " | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
fa2c63a86839a5cd | REDIRECT Talk:EDP Renewables North America | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
fa2cd674701647fe | Yes, I agree, I made a mistake. But see message below, I have clarified what caused the confusion. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
fa2e3d021510a335 | "
You have been temporarily blocked from editing for vandalism of Wikipedia. If you wish to make useful contributions, you may do so after the block expires. xd(?!? - ) " | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.