Datasets:

Modalities:
Text
Formats:
parquet
Libraries:
Datasets
pandas
License:
sileod commited on
Commit
5997c0d
·
1 Parent(s): 152c9f1

Update README.md

Browse files
Files changed (1) hide show
  1. README.md +19 -1
README.md CHANGED
@@ -26,4 +26,22 @@ dataset_info:
26
  download_size: 3369
27
  dataset_size: 0
28
  ---
29
- https://github.com/ruixiangcui/WikiResNLI_NatResNLI
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
26
  download_size: 3369
27
  dataset_size: 0
28
  ---
29
+ https://github.com/ruixiangcui/WikiResNLI_NatResNLI
30
+
31
+ ```
32
+ @inproceedings{cui-etal-2023-failure,
33
+ title = "What does the Failure to Reason with {``}Respectively{''} in Zero/Few-Shot Settings Tell Us about Language Models?",
34
+ author = "Cui, Ruixiang and
35
+ Lee, Seolhwa and
36
+ Hershcovich, Daniel and
37
+ S{\o}gaard, Anders",
38
+ booktitle = "Proceedings of the 61st Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers)",
39
+ month = jul,
40
+ year = "2023",
41
+ address = "Toronto, Canada",
42
+ publisher = "Association for Computational Linguistics",
43
+ url = "https://aclanthology.org/2023.acl-long.489",
44
+ pages = "8786--8800",
45
+ abstract = "Humans can effortlessly understand the coordinate structure of sentences such as {``}Niels Bohr and Kurt Cobain were born in Copenhagen and Seattle, *respectively*{''}. In the context of natural language inference (NLI), we examine how language models (LMs) reason with respective readings (Gawron and Kehler, 2004) from two perspectives: syntactic-semantic and commonsense-world knowledge. We propose a controlled synthetic dataset WikiResNLI and a naturally occurring dataset NatResNLI to encompass various explicit and implicit realizations of {``}respectively{''}. We show that fine-tuned NLI models struggle with understanding such readings without explicit supervision. While few-shot learning is easy in the presence of explicit cues, longer training is required when the reading is evoked implicitly, leaving models to rely on common sense inferences. Furthermore, our fine-grained analysis indicates models fail to generalize across different constructions. To conclude, we demonstrate that LMs still lag behind humans in generalizing to the long tail of linguistic constructions.",
46
+ }
47
+ ```