Compiler Type,Target,Idx,Des GCC,nvptx,0,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `fclose ( in ) ;` This statement closes the file pointer `in` that was opened earlier in the code snippet. The `fclose` function is used to close a file that was opened using the `fopen` function. The `in` file pointer was opened to read the contents of the file `ptx_name`. After the file is processed, the `fclose` function is called to close the file and release any resources associated with it." GCC,nvptx,1,"Based on the code snippet you provided, it appears to be a part of a program that is generating some output based on the input it receives. The output is being written to a file, and the program is using the `fprintf` function to write the output. The code snippet you provided is not complete, so it's difficult to say exactly what the next statement will be. However, based on the context, it seems likely that the next statement will be another `fprintf` statement that will write more output to the file. It's also worth noting that the code snippet you provided contains" GCC,nvptx,2,The next statement after the `if` block is the `maybe_unlink` function call. GCC,nvptx,3,"The next statement after the given code snippet is: `if ( ptx_name ) maybe_unlink ( ptx_name ) ;` This statement checks if the `ptx_name` variable is not null, and if it is not null, it calls the `maybe_unlink` function with `ptx_name` as an argument. The `maybe_unlink` function is used to unlink a file if it exists." GCC,nvptx,4,"The next statement after the code snippet you provided is: `Stmt * stmt = heap++;` This statement assigns the value of `heap` to `stmt`, and then increments `heap` by 1. The value of `heap` is a pointer to an array of `Stmt` objects, so `stmt` will be a pointer to the first element of that array." GCC,nvptx,5,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `stmt->next = NULL;` Explanation: The code snippet is allocating memory for a `Stmt` object and initializing its fields. The `alloc` variable is used to keep track of the number of `Stmt` objects that have been allocated, and the `heap` variable is used to point to the next available memory location. The first part of the code snippet checks if `alloc` is 0, and if so, it allocates a new block of memory for `alloc` `Stmt` objects" GCC,nvptx,6,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `fork_execute(new_argv[0], CONST_CAST(char * *, new_argv), true);` This statement is calling the `fork_execute` function, which is used to execute a new process. The first argument to `fork_execute` is the name of the executable to run, which in this case is `new_argv[0]`. The second argument is a pointer to an array of strings that contains the command-line arguments for the new process. The third argument is a boolean value that indicates whether" GCC,nvptx,7,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be: `obstack_ptr_grow ( & argv_obstack , ) ;` This is because the previous statement `obstack_ptr_grow ( & argv_obstack , infile ) ;` is using the `obstack_ptr_grow` function to grow the `argv_obstack` obstack by adding the `infile` string to the end of the obstack. The next statement is likely to be another call to `obstack_ptr_grow`" GCC,nvptx,8,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `if ( found )` This is because the code is checking if the `found` variable is true, and if it is, it will execute the code inside the `if` block." GCC,nvptx,9,"Based on the code snippet you provided, it appears to be a part of a C-like programming language parser. The code is checking the current token and its kind, and based on that, it is setting the visibility and other properties of the token. The next statement after the code snippet you provided is: `if ( tok -> kind == '=' ) {` This statement checks if the current token is an assignment operator ('='). If it is, then the code will execute the block of code inside the if statement." GCC,nvptx,10,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it appears to be part of a larger program and the context is not provided. However, based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the next statement will be a conditional statement that checks the value of the `tok` variable and performs different actions based on its value. The first branch of the conditional statement will be executed if `tok` is not equal to `';'`. In this case, the code will set the `space` field of the `tok` variable to a specific value. The second branch of the" GCC,nvptx,11,"Based on the code snippet you provided, it appears to be parsing a programming language. The `switch` statement is checking the value of `tok -> kind` and performing different actions based on that value. Here's a breakdown of the code: 1. `if (tok[ - ].ptr[ ] != '$')`: This line checks if the current token is not a dollar sign. If it is not, it sets `sym` to the current token and sets `tok -> end` to a specific value. 2." GCC,nvptx,12,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `alloc_stmt` function and the values of the variables `start`, `tok`, and ``. However, based on the syntax and the context of the code, it appears that the next statement is likely to be a call to the `alloc_stmt` function, which is used to allocate memory for a new statement. The function takes four arguments: the first is a token, which is used to determine the type of statement to allocate, the second is a pointer to the" GCC,nvptx,13,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be a call to `fprintf` with the `out` file pointer as the first argument, and a string literal as the second argument. The string literal is likely to be a format string that will be used to format the output of the `fprintf` function. The format string is likely to contain placeholders for the variables `nvars` and `nfuncs`, which are the number of variables and functions in the program, respectively. The `fprintf` function will replace these placeholders with the actual values of `nvars` and `" GCC,nvptx,14,"Based on the code snippet you provided, it appears to be generating a PTX (Parallel Thread Execution) file for an NVIDIA GPU. The code is using the `fprintf` function to write the PTX code to a file. The next statement after the code snippet you provided would likely be the next `fprintf` statement, which would write more PTX code to the file. The exact statement would depend on the specific code that follows the snippet you provided." GCC,nvptx,15,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `buffer = XNEWVEC ( char , alloc ) ;` This statement allocates a buffer of size `alloc` using the `XNEWVEC` macro. The buffer is used to store the contents of the file being read." GCC,nvptx,16,"The code snippet is a loop that reverses the order of a linked list. The loop starts with `stmt` pointing to the first node in the list, and then iterates through the list by setting `next` to the next node and `prev` to the previous node. The next statement of the code snippet will be: ``` next = stmt->next; ``` This statement sets `next` to the next node in the list, which is the node that `stmt` is currently pointing to." GCC,nvptx,17,"It's difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the input and the specific implementation of the lexer. However, based on the code snippet, it appears that the next statement will be a `break` statement, as there is a `break` statement at the end of the `switch` block. The `break` statement will cause the lexer to exit the `switch` block and continue with the next token. The lexer will then check if the current token is a comment, and if so, it will skip over it and continue with the next token" GCC,nvptx,18,"The next statement in this code snippet is: `tok -> end = ;` This statement assigns the value of `NUM_LIT` to the `end` field of the `Token` struct pointed to by `tok`. The `NUM_LIT` macro is not defined in the code snippet provided, so its value is not known." GCC,nvptx,19,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the `tool_cleanup` function is not specified. However, based on the name of the function and the fact that it takes a `bool` parameter, it is likely that the function is used to clean up resources associated with a tool. Some possible next statements of this code snippet could include: * `delete` or `free` statements to release memory allocated for the tool * `close` statements to close any open files or connections associated with the tool * `unregister` statements to" GCC,nvptx,20,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the `tool_cleanup` function is not specified. However, based on the name of the function and the fact that it takes a `bool` parameter, it is likely that the function is used to clean up resources associated with a tool. Some possible next statements of this code snippet could include: * `delete` or `free` statements to release memory allocated for the tool * `close` statements to close any open files or connections associated with the tool * `unregister` statements to" GCC,nvptx,21,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `write_tokens(out, stmt->tokens, stmt->len, (stmt->vis & V_mask) == V_pred);`" GCC,nvptx,22,"The next statement in the code snippet is: fputs(, out); Explanation: The code snippet is part of a function that is processing a token stream. The token stream is being processed by a switch statement, and the current token is being checked for its type. If the token is a string, the code snippet will execute. The first line of the code snippet is: fputc(' ', out); This line writes a space character to the output stream. The next line is: switch (tok->" GCC,nvptx,23,"The next statement after the `fputs` function call is the `for` loop. The loop will execute `len` times, and on each iteration, it will call the `write_token` function with the `out` file pointer and the `toks` pointer as arguments." GCC,nvptx,24,"The next statement in this code snippet is: `write_token(out, toks);` This is because the `for` loop has already been executed, and the `if` statement has not been reached yet. The `for` loop will continue to execute until the condition `len--` is false, at which point the loop will terminate and the next statement will be executed. In this case, the next statement is `write_token(out, toks);`." GCC,nvptx,25,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `obstack_ptr_grow ( & argv_obstack , driver ) ;` This statement adds the `driver` string to the `argv_obstack` obstack, which is used to store the command line arguments for the driver program." GCC,nvptx,26,"This code snippet is a part of a larger program that appears to be generating a string of text based on the contents of an input file. The code is using a `switch` statement to process the input file character by character, and it is using `fprintf` to write the output to a file. The next statement in the code snippet is `fprintf(out, );`, which writes a string literal to the output file. The string literal is not specified in the code snippet, so it is not possible to determine what the exact output will be. However, it is likely that" GCC,nvptx,27,"The next statement after the `if` statement is `return access ( name , mode ) ;`." GCC,nvptx,28,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `fork_execute(new_argv[0], CONST_CAST(char **, new_argv), true, );` This statement calls the `fork_execute` function with the following arguments: * `new_argv[0]`: The first element of the `new_argv` array, which is a string representing the name of the executable to be run. * `CONST_CAST(char **, new_argv)`: A cast of the `new_argv` array" GCC,nvptx,29,"The next statement after the `for` loop will be the `return` statement. The `for` loop will iterate over the elements of the array `ptr` and check if each element is not null. If an element is null, the loop will break and the `free` function will be called on the element. If all elements are not null, the loop will continue until the end of the array is reached, and then the `free` function will be called on the entire array. After the `for` loop, the `return` statement will be executed, which will return control to the calling" GCC,nvptx,30,"The next statement in this code snippet is likely to be: unlink(file); This is because the if statement checks the value of the variable `save_temps`, and if it is false, it calls the `unlink` function with the `file` argument." GCC,nvptx,31,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the `tool_cleanup` function is not specified. However, based on the name of the function, it is likely that it is used to clean up resources used by the tool, and it is possible that it will be called automatically when the tool is closed or exits. Without more information about the tool and the `tool_cleanup` function, it is not possible to provide a more specific answer. If you have any additional information or context, please let me know and I will do my best" GCC,nvptx,32,"The next statement in the code snippet is: `values[i] = curval;` Explanation: The code is parsing a string that contains a list of values separated by colons. The `values` array is being used to store the parsed values. The `curval` variable points to the current value being parsed, and the `nextval` variable points to the next value in the list. The `for` loop is iterating over the `values` array, and `i` is the index of the current value being processed. The `if` statement checks if" GCC,nvptx,33,"This code snippet is a part of a C program that appears to be generating a PTX (Parallel Thread Execution) file for the NVIDIA GPU. The code is using the `fprintf` function to write to a file, and it is using a number of string literals and format specifiers to control the output. The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be another `fprintf` statement, as the code is in the middle of writing a PTX file. The next `fprintf` statement is likely to be writing a line of code to the PTX file, using a combination" GCC,nvptx,34,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `buffer = XNEWVEC ( char , alloc ) ;` This statement allocates a buffer of size `alloc` to store the contents of the file being read. The `XNEWVEC` macro is used to allocate memory for the buffer, and the `char` type specifies that the buffer should be an array of characters. The `alloc` variable is used to determine the size of the buffer, which is set to the number of bytes in the file plus a small amount of extra space." GCC,nvptx,35,"The next statement in this code snippet is: `buffer[base] = '\0';` This statement is assigning the null character (`\0`) to the `base`th element of the `buffer` array. The `base` variable is the number of characters that have been read so far, and this statement is adding the null character to the end of the buffer to indicate the end of the string." GCC,nvptx,36,The next statement after the `if` block is the `maybe_unlink` function call. GCC,nvptx,37,The next statement after the `if` block is the `maybe_unlink` function call. GCC,nvptx,38,"The next statement after the `if` block is `putenv(CONST_CAST(char*, string));`." GCC,nvptx,39,"The next statement after the `putenv()` function call in the code snippet is: `return 0;` This is because the `putenv()` function is used to set an environment variable, and the `return 0;` statement is used to indicate that the function has completed successfully." GCC,nvptx,40,"The next statement of this code snippet is: cpp_define_formatted ( parse_in , , minor ) ; Explanation: The code snippet defines a function called `cpp_define_formatted` that takes three arguments: `parse_in`, a string literal, and a number. The function uses the `cpp_define` function to define a preprocessor macro with the name `STR_LIT` and the value of the string literal. The function then uses the `ptx_version_to_number` function to convert the `pt" GCC,nvptx,41,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the values of various variables and macros that are not provided in the code snippet. However, based on the context and the syntax of the code, it appears that the next statement is likely to be a call to the `ptx_version_to_number` function, which takes two arguments: a `ptx_version` enum value and a boolean flag. The function returns an unsigned integer that represents the version number of the PTX virtual machine. The first argument to the function is likely to be the `" GCC,nvptx,42,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `if ( cfun -> machine -> has_simtreg )` This is because the code snippet ends with a conditional statement that checks if the `has_simtreg` field of the `machine` structure is true. If it is, then the code inside the `if` block will be executed, which includes the statement `unsigned HOST_WIDE_INT & simtsz = cfun -> machine -> simt_stack_size;`." GCC,nvptx,43,"It's difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet without knowing the specific values of the variables and the behavior of the functions being called. However, based on the code snippet, it appears that the next statement will be one of the following: 1. `init_frame(file, STACK_POINTER_REGNUM, UNITS_PER_WORD, crtl->outgoing_args_size)`: This statement initializes the stack frame for the current function. 2. `init_frame(file, FRAME_POINTER_REGNUM, alignment, RO" GCC,nvptx,44,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `rtx pat;` This line declares a variable `pat` of type `rtx`, which is a data type used to represent a node in the GIMPLE intermediate representation. The variable `pat` is used to store the result of the `gen_rtx_SET` function, which generates a GIMPLE assignment statement." GCC,nvptx,45,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific inputs and the implementation of the `nvptx_expand_shuffle`, `nvptx_expand_shared_addr`, and `nvptx_expand_cmp_swap` functions. However, based on the code snippet you provided, it appears that the next statement will be a `return` statement, as the `case` statements are checking for specific built-in functions and returning the result of calling the corresponding expansion function. Therefore, the next statement is likely" GCC,nvptx,46,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `r = make_ssa_name (TREE_TYPE (var));` This statement creates a new SSA name (a unique name for a variable) for the result of the vector shuffle operation, which is stored in the `r` variable. The `make_ssa_name` function is used to generate a new SSA name, and the `TREE_TYPE` macro is used to get the type of the `var` variable, which is used as the type of the new SSA name." GCC,nvptx,47,"It's difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `DEF` macro and the semantics of the `` and `NULL_TREE` tokens. However, based on the syntax and the names of the macros, it appears that this code is defining a set of functions or macros that perform various operations on memory barriers. The `MEMBAR_CTA` macro appears to be defining a memory barrier that is used to synchronize access to a shared variable across multiple threads or cores. The `B" GCC,nvptx,48,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the code depends on the specific values of the variables and the functions being called. However, based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the code is initializing various variables and data structures related to OpenACC, a programming model for parallel computing on heterogeneous architectures. The code snippet defines several variables, including `flag_var_tracking`, `declared_fndecls_htab`, `needed_fndecls_htab`, `declared_libf" GCC,nvptx,49,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it appears to be part of a larger program and the context is not provided. However, based on the code snippet provided, it is possible that the next statement could be a call to a function or a declaration of a variable. The code snippet defines several variables, including `declared_libfuncs_htab`, `oacc_bcast_sym`, `worker_red_sym`, `vector_red_sym`, and `gang_private_shared_sym`. These variables are assigned values using various functions" GCC,nvptx,50,"The next statement after the `if` statement is the call to `write_fn_proto_1` with the arguments `s`, `is_defn`, `name`, `decl`, and `force_public`." GCC,nvptx,51,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be: `tree arg = TREE_VALUE ( args ) ;` This statement is assigning the current argument to the `arg` variable, which is likely to be used later in the code snippet to process the argument. The `TREE_VALUE` macro is used to extract the value of the current argument from the `args` list." GCC,nvptx,52,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `fprintf(asm_out_file, );` This is because the `if` statement checks if `decl_offset` is equal to `decl_chunk_size`. If it is, then the first `fprintf` statement is executed, which prints a string literal to the `asm_out_file`. If `decl_offset` is not equal to `decl_chunk_size`, then the second `fprintf` statement is executed, which also prints a string literal to the `asm_out_file`." GCC,nvptx,53,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `fprintf(asm_out_file, );` This is because the `if` statement checks if `decl_offset` is equal to `decl_chunk_size`. If it is, then the first `fprintf` statement is executed, which prints a string literal to the `asm_out_file`. If `decl_offset` is not equal to `decl_chunk_size`, then the second `fprintf` statement is executed, which also prints a string literal to the `asm_out_file`." GCC,nvptx,54,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `assemble_name_raw ( file , name ) ;` This statement is calling the `assemble_name_raw` function with the `file` and `name` arguments. The `assemble_name_raw` function is used to assemble the name of a variable or function, and it is typically used in the context of code generation. The next statement after `assemble_name_raw` is: `fputc ( '\n' , file ) ;` This statement is writing a newline character to" GCC,nvptx,55,"The next statement of this code snippet is: * pmode = DImode; Explanation: The code snippet is checking the value of the ""mode"" variable and setting the value of the ""pmode"" variable accordingly. If the ""mode"" variable is equal to TImode, then the ""pmode"" variable is set to DImode. If the ""mode"" variable is not equal to TImode, then the ""pmode"" variable is set to the value of the next statement, which is ." GCC,nvptx,56,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `if ( GET_CODE ( addr ) != SYMBOL_REF ) return ADDR_SPACE_GENERIC ;` This statement checks if the address is not a symbol reference, and if it's not, it returns the generic address space." GCC,nvptx,57,"The next statement after the `if` statement will be: `return ADDR_SPACE_CONST;` This is because the `if` statement checks if `is_const` is true, and if it is, it returns `ADDR_SPACE_CONST`. If `is_const` is false, the `if` statement will not be executed and the next statement will be the one after the `if` statement." GCC,nvptx,58,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be: `fprintf ( file , , TYPE_ALIGN ( TREE_TYPE ( exp ) ) / BITS_PER_UNIT , decl_chunk_size * BITS_PER_UNIT ) ;` This statement is a call to the `fprintf` function, which is used to print a formatted string to a file. The first argument to `fprintf` is the file to print to, which is `file` in this case. The second argument is a string literal," GCC,nvptx,59,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `fprintf(asm_out_file, );` This is because the `if` statement that precedes it has a condition that is not met, so the code inside the `if` block is not executed. The `fprintf` statement is the next statement that will be executed after the `if` statement." GCC,nvptx,60,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet as it appears to be a part of a larger function and the context is not provided. However, based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the function is trying to assemble a value for a specific address. The function takes an address `x` and a size `size` as input, and it appears to be using the `fprintf` function to print the value of the address to an output file. The function also appears to be using a switch statement to handle different types of values, such as `CONST_INT` and `CONST_DO" GCC,nvptx,61,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `nvptx_assemble_value ( val , size ) ;` This statement is calling the `nvptx_assemble_value` function with the value `val` and the size `size`. The function is responsible for assembling the value into the appropriate format for the target architecture." GCC,nvptx,62,"The next statement in this code snippet is: fputs ( , file ) ; This is because the previous statement, `assemble_name_raw ( file , name ) ;`, does not have a semicolon at the end, so the next statement is executed. The `fputs` function is then called with the string literal `` and the `file` variable as arguments." GCC,nvptx,63,"The next statement of this code snippet is: init_part |= val_part << ( BITS_PER_UNIT * chunk_offset ) ; This statement is assigning the value of val_part, which is a portion of the original value val, to the appropriate position in the init_part variable, which is a chunk of the final value. The value of val_part is determined by the mask and the value of val, and is shifted left by the number of bits in a unit times the chunk offset." GCC,nvptx,64,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `args_so_far = cfun->machine->call_args;` This statement assigns the value of `cfun->machine->call_args` to the variable `args_so_far`." GCC,nvptx,65,"Based on the code snippet you provided, the next statement is likely to be: fprintf ( file , , TREE_PUBLIC ( decl ) ? : , section , DECL_ALIGN ( decl ) / BITS_PER_UNIT , decl_chunk_size * BITS_PER_UNIT ) ; This statement is using the fprintf function to write a formatted string to the file. The format string is represented by , which is a placeholder for a" GCC,nvptx,66,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `nvptx_end_call_args` function and the context in which it is being called. However, based on the name of the function and the fact that it is defined as a `static` function, it is likely that the next statement will be the beginning of the function body, which will contain the code that is executed when the function is called." GCC,nvptx,67,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `rtx * slot = declared_libfuncs_htab->find_slot(callee, INSERT);`" GCC,nvptx,68,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `rtx * slot = declared_libfuncs_htab->find_slot(callee, INSERT);` This line of code is searching for the slot in the `declared_libfuncs_htab` hash table that corresponds to the `callee` function, and if it doesn't exist, it inserts the `callee` function into the table." GCC,nvptx,69,"The next statement after the code snippet you provided is likely to be the continuation of the `fputs` function call, which is used to write a string to a file. In this case, the `fputs` function is being called with three arguments: * The first argument is the string to be written to the file, which is obtained by calling the `str` method on the `func_decls` object and then calling the `c_str` method on the resulting string. * The second argument is the file to which the string should be written, which is represented by" GCC,nvptx,70,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be the next iteration of the `FOR_EACH_HASH_TABLE_ELEMENT` loop, which will retrieve the next element from the hash table and call `nvptx_record_fndecl` with that element as an argument. The `FOR_EACH_HASH_TABLE_ELEMENT` macro is defined in the GCC source code as follows: ``` #define FOR_EACH_HASH_TABLE_ELEMENT(HTAB, DECL, TREE, I" GCC,nvptx,71,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be another call to `fputs` with the same arguments, as the code is repeating the same operation twice. Therefore, the next statement is likely to be: fputs ( , asm_out_file ) ; This will write the contents of the string literal to the output file `asm_out_file`." GCC,nvptx,72,"The next statement in the code snippet is: fprintf ( asm_out_file , , GET_MODE_BITSIZE ( Pmode ) ) ; This statement is a call to the fprintf function, which is used to write a formatted string to a file. The first argument is the file pointer asm_out_file, the second argument is a string literal, and the third argument is the result of the GET_MODE_BITSIZE function, which returns the number of bits in the Pmode mode." GCC,nvptx,73,The next statement after the `if` block will be the `return` statement. The function will return the value of `gen_reg_rtx(mode)` if the condition `named` is true. GCC,nvptx,74,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return gen_reg_rtx ( mode ) ;` This is because the `if` statement checks if `named` is true, and if it is, it returns the result of `gen_reg_rtx ( mode )`. Since `named` is true in this case, the `if` statement is executed and the function returns the result of `gen_reg_rtx ( mode )`." GCC,nvptx,75,"The next statement of this code snippet is: cum -> count += ; This is because the if statement checks whether the mode is equal to TImode, and if it is, it increments the count by . If the mode is not equal to TImode, it increments the count by 1." GCC,nvptx,76,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return * BITS_PER_UNIT;` This statement is executed when the `size` variable is greater than or equal to ``, which is a constant value. The statement returns the value of ` * BITS_PER_UNIT`, which is the number of bits in a unit multiplied by the number of units in the size variable." GCC,nvptx,77,"The next statement of this code snippet is: fprintf(file, ); This statement is a call to the fprintf function, which is used to write a string to a file. The first argument to fprintf is the file to write to, and the second argument is the string to write. The placeholder is used to represent a string literal, which is a string that is stored in the program's memory and can be used as an argument to fprintf." GCC,nvptx,78,"The code snippet is a C function that returns a value of type `RTX`. The function takes two arguments: `mode` and `cum`. The function first checks if the `named` variable is not equal to `NULL`. If it is `NULL`, the function returns `NULL_RTX`. If `named` is not `NULL`, the function creates a new `RTX` object using the `gen_rtx_UNSPEC` function. The `gen_rtx_UNSPEC` function takes three arguments: `mode`, `gen_rtvec`," GCC,nvptx,79,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be: `mode = promote_function_mode ( type , orig_mode , & unsignedp , NULL_TREE , ) ;` This statement is calling the `promote_function_mode` function, which is used to promote the function mode of the `type` parameter to a wider mode if necessary. The `orig_mode` parameter is the original mode of the `type` parameter, and the `unsignedp` parameter is a flag indicating whether the `type` parameter is unsigned. The `NULL_" GCC,nvptx,80,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be: `return gen_rtx_REG ( mode , NVPTX_RETURN_REGNUM ) ;` This is because the `if` statement that checks `outgoing` is executed first, and if `outgoing` is true, the function returns the result of `gen_rtx_REG ( mode , NVPTX_RETURN_REGNUM )`. If `outgoing` is false, the next `if` statement checks `cfun -> machine -> start_call == NULL_RTX`," GCC,nvptx,81,"The next statement of this code snippet is: * no_add_attrs = true;" GCC,nvptx,82,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return mode == cfun->machine->ret_reg_mode;` This statement is executed if the `if` condition is true, which means that `regno` is not equal to `NVPTX_RETURN_REGNUM` and `cfun` is not null, and `cfun->machine->ret_reg_mode` is not equal to `VOIDmode`. Therefore, the next statement is to return the result of the comparison between `mode` and `cfun->machine->ret_reg_" GCC,nvptx,83,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return mode == cfun->machine->ret_reg_mode;` This is because the `if` statement is only executed if the condition `regno != NVPTX_RETURN_REGNUM || cfun == NULL || cfun->machine->ret_reg_mode == VOIDmode` is true. If the condition is true, the `return true;` statement is executed and the function returns. If the condition is false, the `return mode == cfun->machine->ret_reg_mode;` statement is executed and" GCC,nvptx,84,"The next statement of this code snippet is: p->ret_reg_mode = VOIDmode; This statement assigns the value VOIDmode to the ret_reg_mode field of the machine_function structure pointed to by p." GCC,nvptx,85,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return gen_rtx_REG (mode, NVPTX_REG_R0);` This statement returns a register of the specified mode, with the register number set to 0. The `NVPTX_REG_R0` macro is used to generate the register number." GCC,nvptx,86,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `code = ( as == ADDR_SPACE_GLOBAL ? UNSPEC_FROM_GLOBAL : as == ADDR_SPACE_LOCAL ? UNSPEC_FROM_LOCAL : as == ADDR_SPACE_SHARED ? UNSPEC_FROM_SHARED : as == ADDR_SPACE_CONST ? UNSPEC_FROM_CONST : UNSPEC_FROM_PARAM ) ;` This statement is a ternary operator that assigns a" GCC,nvptx,87,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `rtx nvptx_maybe_convert_symbolic_operand ( rtx orig_op ) { if ( GET_MODE ( orig_op ) != Pmode ) return orig_op ; rtx op = orig_op ; while ( GET_CODE ( op ) == PLUS || GET_CODE ( op ) == CONST ) op = XEXP ( op , ) ; if ( GET_CODE ( op ) != SYMBOL_REF ) return orig_op ; tree decl = SYMBOL" GCC,nvptx,88,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `flag_toplevel_reorder = ;` This is because the code snippet is initializing the `nvptx_init_machine_status` function, which is a part of the NVIDIA CUDA runtime library. The `flag_toplevel_reorder` variable is being set to a specific value, which is represented by the `` placeholder. The `flag_var_tracking` variable is also being set to a specific value, which is represented by the" GCC,nvptx,89,"The next statement of this code snippet is: fprintf ( asm_out_file , ) ; This statement is part of the code that generates the assembly code for a function call. It is responsible for printing the function name and the arguments to the assembly file. The placeholder is used to represent a string literal that is specific to the target platform." GCC,nvptx,90,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be: `tree result_type = TREE_TYPE ( fntype ) ;` This statement is assigning the type of the function (which is stored in the `TREE_TYPE` field of the `fntype` variable) to the `result_type` variable." GCC,nvptx,91,"The next statement after the `if` block is: `mode = arg_promotion ( mode ) ;`" GCC,nvptx,92,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `nvptx_assemble_value ( , decl_chunk_size ) ;` This statement is part of the `do` loop, and it assembles a value of `` using the `nvptx_assemble_value` function. The value is assembled using the `decl_chunk_size` as the second argument, which is the size of the chunk to be assembled. The assembled value is then stored in the `object_finished` variable." GCC,nvptx,93,"The next statement after the given code snippet is likely to be the return value of the function, which is the negation of the result of the `PASS_IN_REG_P` function call. In other words, the function is returning `true` if the value passed in the register is not a register, and `false` otherwise." GCC,nvptx,94,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `off = XEXP ( x , ) ;` This line of code is assigning the value of the expression `XEXP ( x , )` to the variable `off`. The `XEXP` macro is used to extract the operand at the specified position (in this case, the operand at position ``) from the expression `x`. The `GET_CODE` macro is used to retrieve the opcode of the expression `x`, which is then" GCC,nvptx,95,"The code snippet you provided is a function that takes a file and an x86 instruction as input, and outputs the instruction to the file. The function uses a switch statement to determine the type of instruction and output the appropriate code. The next statement of the code snippet is: `switch ( GET_CODE ( x ) ) {` This line is the beginning of a switch statement that checks the type of instruction represented by the x86 instruction. The switch statement will output the appropriate code for each type of instruction." GCC,nvptx,96,"Based on the code snippet provided, it is difficult to predict the next statement with certainty. However, based on the context of the code, it appears to be a part of a function that is generating assembly code for a specific architecture. The function takes a file pointer and a string literal as input, and it appears to be generating assembly code for a specific instruction. The function uses a switch statement to determine the instruction type and generate the appropriate assembly code. Based on the code snippet, it is possible that the next statement could be one of the following: * A case statement for a specific instruction" GCC,nvptx,97,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be a call to the `nvptx_print_address_operand` function, which is a part of the NVIDIA CUDA compiler. The function takes three arguments: a file pointer, an address, and a machine mode. The function is used to print the address of an operand in the NVIDIA PTX (Parallel Thread Execution) instruction set architecture. Here is an example of how the function might be called: ``` nvptx_print_address_operand(file, addr, VO" GCC,nvptx,98,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `mode = arg_promotion ( mode ) ;` This statement is executed if the following conditions are true: * `TYPE_ARG_TYPES ( funtype )` is NULL, meaning that the function has no argument types. * `type` is not NULL, meaning that the function has a return type. * `type` is not an aggregate type, meaning that it is not a struct or union type. * `mode` is equal to `SFmode`, meaning that the function is returning a single-" GCC,nvptx,99,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `mode = arg_promotion(mode);` This statement is executed if the following conditions are true: * `TYPE_ARG_TYPES(funtype)` is `NULL_TREE` * `type` is not `NULL_TREE` * `type` is not an aggregate type (i.e., it is not a struct or union type) * `mode` is `SFmode` In this case, the `mode` is promoted to `DFmode` if it is currently `" GCC,nvptx,100,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return ;` This is because the `if` statement checks the value of `promote`, and if it is true, it returns the first string literal. If `promote` is false, it returns the second string literal. If `promote` is not true or false, it moves on to the next case statement, which checks the value of `mode`. If `mode` is `HImode`, it returns the third string literal. If `mode` is `SImode`, it returns the fourth string literal" GCC,nvptx,101,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `if (force || !DECL_EXTERNAL (decl)) {`" GCC,nvptx,102,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `tree * slot = declared_fndecls_htab->find_slot(decl, INSERT);` This statement retrieves a pointer to a slot in the `declared_fndecls_htab` hash table, where the key is the `decl` object and the value is the `decl` object itself. The `INSERT` parameter indicates that the slot should be created if it does not already exist. The next statement is: `if (*slot == NULL) {` This statement checks" GCC,nvptx,103,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `nvptx_record_needed_fndecl` function and the context in which it is called. However, based on the name of the function and the fact that it takes a `tree` parameter, it is likely that the next statement will involve processing or manipulating the function declaration represented by the `tree` object. Some possible next statements could include: * Checking the type of the function declaration to determine if it is a device function or a host" GCC,nvptx,104,"The next statement after the `if` statement in the code snippet is `return ;`, which means that the function will return without executing any further statements." GCC,nvptx,105,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `fprintf(asm_out_file, "" %s"", IDENTIFIER_POINTER(DECL_ASSEMBLER_NAME(decl)));`. This statement is printing the assembler name of the declaration `decl` to the output file `asm_out_file`. The `fprintf` function is used to format the output, and the `%s` format specifier is used to print a string. The `IDENTIFIER_POINTER` macro is used to get the pointer to the assembler" GCC,nvptx,106,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `fprintf(asm_out_file, "" %s"", IDENTIFIER_POINTER(DECL_ASSEMBLER_NAME(decl)));`. This statement is printing the assembler name of the declaration `decl` to the output file `asm_out_file`. The `fprintf` function is used to format the output, and the `%s` format specifier is used to print a string. The `IDENTIFIER_POINTER` macro is used to get the pointer to the assembler" GCC,nvptx,107,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `if (recog_data.operand_type[i] != OP_OUT) {`" GCC,nvptx,108,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be the initialization of the `regstat_init_n_sets_and_refs` function, which is used to initialize the number of sets and references for each register in the program. The function is called with no arguments, and it is likely to initialize the `regstat` data structure with the number of sets and references for each register in the program. The `regstat` data structure is used to keep track of the number of sets and references for each register in the program, and it is used by the register allocator to determine the best allocation of" GCC,nvptx,109,"The next statement after the `if` statement will be `return false;`. The `if` statement checks the condition `! RETURN_IN_REG_P ( mode )`, which is negated, meaning that it will be true if the condition is false. If the condition is true, the `return true;` statement will be executed, and the function will return true. However, if the condition is false, the `return false;` statement will be executed, and the function will return false. Therefore, the next statement after the `if` statement will be `return false;`." GCC,nvptx,110,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return false;` Explanation: The `nvptx_return_in_memory` function is checking whether the return value of a function should be returned in memory or not. It does this by checking the `RETURN_IN_REG_P` macro, which is defined in the `nvptx-return.h` header file. This macro checks whether the return type of the function is a pointer or not. If it is a pointer, the function returns `true`, indicating that the return value should be returned" GCC,nvptx,111,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return ;` Explanation: The `nvptx_section_for_decl` function takes a `const_tree` parameter named `decl` and returns a string literal representing the section name for the declaration. The function first checks if the declaration is constant by checking if it is a constant class, a `CONST_DECL`, or has the `TREE_READONLY` flag set. If the declaration is constant, the function returns the string literal ``. Otherwise" GCC,nvptx,112,"The next statement of this code snippet is: return ; Explanation: The code snippet is checking if the variable `decl` is a constant or readonly variable. If it is, it returns a string literal. If it is not, it also returns a string literal. Therefore, the next statement is to return a string literal." GCC,nvptx,113,"The next statement in the code snippet is: return ; This is because the switch statement is checking the value of the `addr_space` variable, and if it is equal to `ADDR_SPACE_SHARED`, it will return the string literal """". If the value of `addr_space` is not equal to `ADDR_SPACE_SHARED`, it will fall through to the next case, which is `ADDR_SPACE_GENERIC`. In this case, the code will return the string literal "" << i << ; Explanation: The code snippet is part of a function that is generating a string representation of a function declaration. The variable ""s"" is a string stream, and the variable ""i"" is an integer that keeps track of the number of arguments that have been processed so far. The code is checking if the function has any arguments, and if so, it is writing the argument list to the string stream. The statement ""s << " GCC,nvptx,120,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the code depends on the specific implementation of the `begin_decl_field` function and the input parameters passed to it. However, based on the name of the function, it is likely that it is used to begin the declaration of a field in a structure or class. In this case, the next statement of the code snippet could be the declaration of the field, such as `int x;` or `string name;`. Alternatively, the `begin_decl_field` function could be used" GCC,nvptx,121,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `args_from_decl = true ;`" GCC,nvptx,122,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return (lookup_attribute(, attrs) != NULL_TREE || lookup_attribute(, attrs) != NULL_TREE);` This statement is a return statement that returns a boolean value indicating whether the `lookup_attribute` function found an attribute with the specified name in the `attrs` list. The `lookup_attribute` function is called twice, once with the `attrs` list and once with the `attrs` list and the `NULL_TREE` value." GCC,nvptx,123,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `s << name;` Explanation: The code snippet is defining a function called `write_function_decl_and_comment` that takes three parameters: a `std::stringstream` reference called `s`, a `const char*` called `name`, and a `const_tree` called `decl`. The function is writing some text to the `s` stream, which is a stringstream. The first line of the function is `s << ;`, which writes a string literal to the stream" GCC,nvptx,124,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `s << name << ""(""; // write the function name and opening parenthesis`" GCC,nvptx,125,"Based on the code snippet you provided, it appears to be generating a string representation of a function call in a specific language (possibly CUDA). The code is using a number of placeholders (e.g. , ) to represent various parts of the function call, such as the function name, the number of arguments, and the types of the arguments. Without knowing the specific language being used or the context in which this code is being executed, it is difficult to provide a more specific answer. However, based on the code snippet you provided, it" GCC,nvptx,126,"Based on the code snippet you provided, it appears to be generating a string representation of a function call. The next statement is likely to be the first argument of the function call. The code is using a string stream to build up the string representation of the function call. The `s` variable is the string stream, and the `<<` operator is used to append strings to the stream. The `STR_LIT` tokens are string literals that are being appended to the stream. The code is checking the `callprototype` variable to determine whether the function call has a prototype or not. If" GCC,nvptx,127,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `write_one_arg (s, NULL_TREE, i, mode, false);` This is because the `if` statement that follows the `write_one_arg` call is checking the value of `count`, which is set to the result of `maybe_split_mode(&mode)`. If `count` is equal to ``, then the `if` statement will be executed, and the `write_one_arg` call will be made with the arguments `s`, `NULL_TREE`, `i" GCC,nvptx,128,"Based on the code snippet you provided, it appears to be generating a string representation of a type and its mode. The code is using a combination of string concatenation and arithmetic operations to build the string. The next statement is likely to be: s << << nvptx_ptx_type_from_mode ( mode , false ) << << ( i + ) << ( mode == QImode || mode == HImode ? : ) ;" GCC,nvptx,129,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the program depends on the specific inputs and the state of the `block` and `flags` variables. However, based on the code snippet provided, it is likely that the next statement will be a comparison of the `flags` variable with the `BB_VISITED` bit mask, as the code is using the bitwise AND operator to clear the `BB_VISITED` bit in the `flags` variable. Here is a possible next statement: ``` if (flags & BB" GCC,nvptx,130,"This code snippet is initializing a structure called `init_frag` with various values. The structure has the following fields: * `size`: the size of the fragment in bytes * `mask`: a bitmask representing the fragment * `val`: the value of the fragment * `offset`: the offset of the fragment within the section * `started`: a boolean indicating whether the fragment has been started * `remaining`: the number of bytes remaining in the fragment The code snippet is using the `GET_MODE_SIZE` macro to get the size of a mode (which" GCC,nvptx,131,"The next statement of this code snippet is: fprintf ( file , , section , align / BITS_PER_UNIT , elt_size * BITS_PER_UNIT ) ; This statement is calling the fprintf function to print a string literal to the file. The string literal is represented by , and it is followed by three arguments: section, align / BITS_PER_UNIT, and elt_size * BITS_PER_UNIT. These arguments are used to format the string literal" GCC,nvptx,132,"The next statement is likely to be: fprintf ( file, ) ; This is because the previous statement, write_var_marker ( file , false , TREE_PUBLIC ( decl ) , name ) ;, is a function call that takes four arguments, and the next statement is a function call that takes three arguments. The third argument of the previous statement, TREE_PUBLIC ( decl ), is likely to be the same as the third argument of the next statement, TREE_PUBLIC ( decl ), which is a macro that expands to" GCC,nvptx,133,"The next statement after `fprintf(file, ); tree size = DECL_SIZE_UNIT(decl);` is likely to be `fprintf(file, ""%zu"", tree_size);`. The `fprintf` function is used to write a formatted string to a file. The first argument is the file pointer, the second argument is the format string, and the third argument is the value to be printed. In this case, the format string is ``, which is a string literal that represents a format string for a size value in bytes. The" GCC,nvptx,134,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `init_frag . offset += part ;`" GCC,nvptx,135,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be: `int maxregs = max_reg_num ( ) ;` This statement is assigning the maximum number of registers used in the function to the variable `maxregs`. The function `max_reg_num` is likely to return the maximum number of registers used in the function, and the result is being stored in the variable `maxregs`." GCC,nvptx,136,"The next statement is: fprintf ( file , , s . str ( ) . c_str ( ) ) ; This statement is printing the contents of the string buffer `s` to the file `file`. The `c_str()` method is used to convert the string buffer to a C-style string, which is then printed using `fprintf()`." GCC,nvptx,137,"The next statement after the `switch` statement would be the `default` case, which is the `break` statement. The `break` statement is used to exit the `switch` statement and continue executing the code after the `switch` statement. In this case, the `break` statement would be executed if the `axis` variable is not equal to `GOMP_DIM_WORKER` or `GOMP_DIM_VECTOR`. Therefore, the next statement after the `switch` statement would be the `break` statement." GCC,nvptx,138,"The next statement after the `default` label is the `break` statement. The `break` statement is used to exit the `switch` statement and return control to the calling function. Therefore, the next statement after the `default` label is: ``` break; ```" GCC,nvptx,139,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be a call to a function that takes `op` as an argument. The function is not specified in the code snippet provided, so it is not possible to predict the exact statement that will be executed. However, based on the context of the code, it is likely that the function being called is related to the generation of a mask or a dimension for a parallel computation." GCC,nvptx,140,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `emit_insn ( gen_nvptx_joining ( op ) ) ;`" GCC,nvptx,141,"The next statement after the `if` block is: `SET_SYMBOL_DATA_AREA ( XEXP ( rtl , ) , area ) ;` This statement sets the data area for the symbol associated with the RTL expression `rtl` to the value of `area`. The `NUM_LIT` parameter is used to specify the number of the literal that should be used to encode the data area." GCC,nvptx,142,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return nvptx_expand_shuffle ( exp , target , mode , ignore ) ;` This is because the `switch` statement is checking the value of `DECL_FUNCTION_CODE ( fndecl )`, which is the function code of the function being called. If the function code is `NVPTX_BUILTIN_SHUFFLE` or `NVPTX_BUILTIN_SHUFFLELL`, the `switch` statement will execute the `return` statement." GCC,nvptx,143,"The next statement is: `vec = rtvec_alloc ( nargs + ) ;` This statement allocates a new `rtvec` object with a size of `nargs + `, where `` is a literal value that represents the number of arguments passed to the function. The `rtvec` object is used to store the arguments passed to the function." GCC,nvptx,144,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `rtx addr = worker_red_sym;` This line of code assigns the value of `worker_red_sym` to the variable `addr`." GCC,nvptx,145,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `rtx addr = gen_rtx_CONST ( Pmode , addr ) ;` This statement is assigning the result of `gen_rtx_CONST` to the variable `addr`. The `gen_rtx_CONST` function is used to create a constant RTX expression, and the `Pmode` parameter specifies the machine mode of the expression. The `addr` variable is being used as the operand of the `PLUS` RTX expression, which is used to add the offset to the address of the worker" GCC,nvptx,146,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `write_worker_buffer(asm_out_file, worker_bcast_sym, worker_bcast_align, worker_bcast_size);`" GCC,nvptx,147,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `fputs(func_decls.str().c_str(), asm_out_file);` This statement writes the contents of the `func_decls` string to the output file `asm_out_file`." GCC,nvptx,148,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet without knowing the specific values of the variables and the context in which the code is being executed. However, based on the code snippet you provided, it appears that the code is handling the case where a parallel region is being created or joined. In the first case, the code is creating a new parallel region and setting the `forked_block` and `forked_insn` fields of the `par` structure to the current block and the `end` instruction, respectively. It is also setting the `mask` field of the `par" GCC,nvptx,149,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return nvptx_function_arg_reg (mode, named);` This is because the `nvptx_function_arg` function is defined to call the `nvptx_function_arg_reg` function with the `mode` and `named` arguments, and then return the result of that function call." GCC,nvptx,150,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `get_cumulative_args` function and the value of the `cum_v` variable. However, based on the code snippet you provided, it is likely that the next statement will be an increment of the `count` field of the `CUMULATIVE_ARGS` structure pointed to by `cum`. This is because the code snippet first retrieves a pointer to a `CUMULATIVE_ARGS` structure using the `get_" GCC,nvptx,151,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `rtx nvptx_function_value ( const_tree type , const_tree func , bool outgoing ) {` This is a function definition, which declares a function named `nvptx_function_value` that takes three arguments: `type`, `func`, and `outgoing`. The function returns a value of type `rtx`." GCC,nvptx,152,"The next statement of the code snippet is: `return nvptx_libcall_value ( mode , NULL_RTX ) ;` This statement is a function call to `nvptx_libcall_value`, which is a function that returns a value of type `rtx`. The function takes two arguments: `mode` and `NULL_RTX`. The `mode` argument is a value of type `machine_mode`, which is a type that represents the mode of a machine instruction. The `NULL_RTX` argument is a value of type `rtx`," GCC,nvptx,153,"The next statement of the code snippet is: res = gen_packsidi2 ( dst , src0 , src1 ) ; This is because the switch statement is checking the mode of the destination operand (dst) and selecting the appropriate instruction to generate the packed value based on the mode. In this case, the mode is DImode, so the instruction gen_packsidi2 will be called to generate the packed value." GCC,nvptx,154,"The code snippet you provided is a part of a function that generates pack instructions for the NVIDIA PTX target. The function takes three arguments: `dst`, `src0`, and `src1`. The function uses a `switch` statement to determine the mode of the `dst` argument, and then generates a pack instruction based on the mode. Based on the code snippet you provided, the next statement of the code would be: ``` case DImode : ``` This statement is part of the `switch` statement that determines the mode of the `dst` argument. The `" GCC,nvptx,155,"The next statement in the code snippet is: emit_insn ( gen_sel_truesi ( tmp , src , GEN_INT ( ) , const0_rtx ) ) ; This statement generates a sequence of instructions to perform a shuffle operation on the input vector. The shuffle operation is performed using the `nvptx_gen_shuffle` function, which takes four arguments: the first two are the input and output vectors, and the third is a constant integer that specifies the shuffle mask. The fourth argument is a constant integer" GCC,nvptx,156,"The next statement after the `switch` statement is the `default` case, which is unreachable. The `gcc_unreachable()` function is used to indicate that the `default` case is unreachable and should never be executed. Therefore, the next statement after the `switch` statement is the `default` case, which is unreachable." GCC,nvptx,157,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return nvptx_gen_shuffle ( reg , reg , const0_rtx , SHUFFLE_IDX ) ;` This statement is a function call to `nvptx_gen_shuffle`, which is a function that generates a shuffle instruction for the NVIDIA PTX virtual machine. The function takes four arguments: * `reg`: The first operand of the shuffle instruction. * `reg`: The second operand of the shuffle instruction. * `const0_rt" GCC,nvptx,158,"Based on the code snippet provided, it appears to be part of a function that is generating code for a memory access. The function is using the `gen_rtx_MEM` function to create a memory reference, and then it is using the `gen_rtx_SET` function to create a set operation that assigns a value to the memory location. The next statement of the code snippet is: ``` res = gen_rtx_SET ( addr , reg ) ; ``` This statement is assigning the value of the `reg` variable to the memory location referenced by `addr`." GCC,nvptx,159,"The next statement of this code snippet is: tree addr = build_call_expr ( fndecl, 3, type, size, align, offset ); This statement is calling the built-in function ""nvptx_builtin_decl"" with the arguments ""NVPTX_BUILTIN_WORKER_ADDR"", ""true"", ""type"", ""size"", ""align"", and ""offset"". The function is returning a tree node that represents the address of the worker thread's red zone." GCC,nvptx,160,The next statement after the `break` statement is `case IFN_GOACC_REDUCTION_FINI :`. GCC,nvptx,161,"The next statement in this code snippet is: case IFN_GOACC_REDUCTION_TEARDOWN: nvptx_goacc_reduction_teardown(call); break;" GCC,nvptx,162,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet without knowing the specific values of the variables and the context in which the code is being executed. However, based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the next statement will be a call to `gsi_insert_seq_before`, which inserts a sequence of statements before a given statement in a GIMPLE statement list. The sequence of statements to be inserted is stored in the `seq` variable, and the statement before which the sequence will be inserted is stored in the `gsi` variable." GCC,nvptx,163,"It's difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet without knowing the context in which it is being executed. However, based on the code snippet provided, it appears to be related to the implementation of a loop in the GIMPLE intermediate representation. The code snippet creates a conditional statement using the `gimple_build_cond` function, which takes three arguments: the condition to be tested, the true value, and the false value. In this case, the condition is `NE_EXPR`, which means ""not equal to zero"". The true value is `tid`, which is a pointer" GCC,nvptx,164,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be the assignment of the result of the reduction operation to the left-hand side (LHS) of the original call statement. The code snippet is part of a function that sets up the reduction operation for the NVIDIA GPU target. It takes a call statement as input, which represents a reduction operation, and sets up the necessary data structures and operations to perform the reduction on the GPU. The code snippet first retrieves the left-hand side (LHS) of the call statement, which represents the variable that will receive the result of the reduction operation." GCC,nvptx,165,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `gimplify_assign ( lhs , var , & seq ) ;` This statement is assigning the value of `var` to `lhs`, which is the left-hand side of the assignment. The `gimplify_assign` function is used to generate the necessary code to perform the assignment, and the `& seq` argument is used to pass the sequence of statements that will be generated." GCC,nvptx,166,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `TREE_THIS_VOLATILE ( var ) = ;` This statement sets the `TREE_THIS_VOLATILE` flag of the variable `var` to the value of ``. The `TREE_THIS_VOLATILE` flag is used to indicate that the variable is volatile, meaning that its value can change unexpectedly and should not be cached or optimized away by the compiler." GCC,nvptx,167,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `dims[GOMP_DIM_WORKER] = PTX_WORKER_LENGTH;`" GCC,nvptx,168,"The next statement of this code snippet is: fprintf(file, ""axis %s"", name);" GCC,nvptx,169,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the code depends on the specific inputs and the implementation of the functions being called. However, we can make some educated guesses based on the code snippet provided. The code snippet defines several functions, including `SHUFFLELL`, `WORKER_ADDR`, `CMP_SWAP`, and `CMP_SWAPLL`. These functions are likely to be used for some kind of data manipulation or processing, but without more context it is difficult to say exactly what they do." GCC,nvptx,170,"It's difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `DEF` macro and the values of the variables used in the macro invocations. However, based on the syntax and the names of the macros, it appears that the code is defining three functions: `WORKER_ADDR`, `CMP_SWAP`, and `CMP_SWAPLL`. The `WORKER_ADDR` function takes a `PTRVOID` argument and returns a `UINT` value. The `CMP_" GCC,nvptx,171,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return gen_rtx_REG ( mode , NVPTX_RETURN_REGNUM ) ;` This statement returns a register of the specified mode and number, which is the return register for the current function. The `gen_rtx_REG` function is used to generate a register of the specified type and number. The `mode` parameter is the mode of the register, and the `NVPTX_RETURN_REGNUM` parameter is the number of the return register." GCC,nvptx,172,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return gen_reg_rtx ( mode ) ;` This is because the `if` statement checks the value of `cfun->machine->doing_call`, and if it is false, the function returns a register with the specified mode and number. If the `if` statement is not executed, the function returns a register with the specified mode." GCC,nvptx,173,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet as it appears to be a fragment of a larger program and the context is not provided. However, based on the code snippet provided, it appears to be related to loop optimization and the creation of a new loop. The code snippet defines a new loop, `lock_loop`, and sets its header and latch to `lock_bb`. It also sets the number of iterations for the loop and marks it as having an estimate. The loop is then added to the existing loop hierarchy. The code snippet also creates a new sequence of statements, `red" GCC,nvptx,174,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `gsi_insert_seq_before ( gsi , latch_seq , GSI_SAME_STMT ) ;` This statement inserts the sequence `latch_seq` before the statement pointed to by `gsi`, and sets the insertion point to `GSI_SAME_STMT`. This means that the sequence will be inserted at the same point as the statement that `gsi` points to, and the insertion point will be set to the same statement as `gsi`." GCC,nvptx,175,"The next statement of this code snippet is: worker_bcast_sym = gen_rtx_SYMBOL_REF ( Pmode , ) ; This is because the code snippet ends with a semicolon, which indicates the end of a statement in C. The next statement is a new assignment to the variable `worker_bcast_sym`, which is a symbol reference in the Pmode." GCC,nvptx,176,"Based on the code snippet provided, it appears to be a part of a function that generates assembly code for a call instruction. The function takes several arguments, including a register operand, a symbol reference, and a pattern. It then generates assembly code for the call instruction, including the function name, arguments, and return value. The next statement of the code snippet is likely to be the assembly code for the call instruction, which would be generated using the `fprintf` function. The exact assembly code generated would depend on the specific arguments passed to the function and the target platform." GCC,nvptx,177,"The next statement of this code snippet is: if ( GET_CODE ( sym ) == CONST ) sym = XEXP ( XEXP ( sym , ) , ) ; This statement is checking if the symbol is a constant, and if so, it is extracting the inner expression of the constant. The placeholders are likely indicating the position of the inner expression in the constant." GCC,nvptx,178,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the `pass_in_memory` function is not known. However, based on the name of the function and the arguments passed to it, it is likely that the function will pass the `mode`, `type`, and `false` arguments to another function or module, which will then perform some operation on the data. Without more information about the `pass_in_memory` function and the context in which it is being called, it is not possible to provide a more specific prediction of what the next statement" GCC,nvptx,179,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `inner_mask |= par -> inner_mask ;` This statement is executed if `par -> inner` is true, and it sets the `inner_mask` field of `par` to the bitwise OR of the current value of `inner_mask` and the value of `par -> inner_mask`." GCC,nvptx,180,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `if (par->mask & GOMP_DIM_MASK(GOMP_DIM_MAX)) {` This is because the code is checking the `mask` field of the `par` struct to see if the `GOMP_DIM_MASK(GOMP_DIM_MAX)` bit is set. If it is set, then the code will execute the statement inside the `if` block. If it is not set, then the code will execute the `else if` block." GCC,nvptx,181,"The next statement of this code snippet is: emit_insn ( gen_rtx_SET ( idx , GEN_INT ( fs ) ) ) ;" GCC,nvptx,182,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet without knowing the context in which it is being executed. However, based on the code snippet provided, it appears to be a part of a function that is generating instructions for a loop. The code snippet is using the `emit_insn` function to generate instructions for the loop, and it is using the `gen_rtx_SET` function to generate the instructions for setting the values of the loop variables. The `emit_insn` function is used to emit the instructions for the loop, and the `gen_rtx_CLOBBER" GCC,nvptx,183,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `fprintf(asm_out_file, , size);` This statement is inside the `for` loop, which is iterating over the `dims` tree. The loop starts at index `ix = ` and continues until `ix` is equal to `GOMP_DIM_MAX`. Inside the loop, the statement `fprintf(asm_out_file, , size);` is executed, where `` is a string literal and `size`" GCC,nvptx,184,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `tree attr = get_oacc_fn_attrib ( current_function_decl ) ;` This line retrieves the OpenACC function attribute for the current function, which is used to determine the number of dimensions and the size of each dimension in the parallel region." GCC,nvptx,185,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be the continuation of the `for` loop, with the variable `ix` being incremented and the loop condition being checked again." GCC,nvptx,186,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `if (target->flags & BB_VISITED) n = nvptx_sese_number(n, p, dir, target, list);` This is because the `FOR_EACH_EDGE` macro iterates over the edges in the `edges` vector, and for each edge, it sets `e` to the current edge and `ei` to the edge iterator. The `if` statement checks if the target basic block of the current edge has been visited before, and if so, it calls the `" GCC,nvptx,187,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific input data and the behavior of the `nvptx_sese_number` function. However, based on the code snippet, it appears that the next statement after the `FOR_EACH_EDGE` loop will be the `dir = - dir` statement, which is used to flip the direction of the search. The `FOR_EACH_EDGE` loop iterates over the edges in the `edges` list, and for each edge, it retrieves" GCC,nvptx,188,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet without knowing the context and the values of the variables involved. However, based on the syntax and the structure of the code, it appears that the next statement will be a continuation of the `FOR_EACH_EDGE` loop, with the `target` variable being set to the next edge in the `edges` list." GCC,nvptx,189,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `hi_child = t_hi;` This is because the `if` statement that precedes this line checks whether `hi_child` is greater than `t_hi`, and if it is, it assigns `t_hi` to `hi_child`." GCC,nvptx,190,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `if ( GOMP_DIM_MASK ( GOMP_DIM_VECTOR ) == mask ) {` This is because the `if` statement checks whether the `GOMP_DIM_MASK` for the `GOMP_DIM_VECTOR` dimension is equal to the `mask` variable. If it is, then the code inside the `if` block will be executed." GCC,nvptx,191,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `if ( GOMP_DIM_MASK ( GOMP_DIM_VECTOR ) == mask ) {` This is because the `if` statement is checking if the `GOMP_DIM_MASK` for the `GOMP_DIM_VECTOR` dimension is equal to the `mask` variable. If it is, then the code inside the `if` statement will be executed." GCC,nvptx,192,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `nvptx_propagate ( block , insn , PM_read_write , vprop_gen , ) ;` This statement calls the `nvptx_propagate` function with the following arguments: * `block`: The basic block to be propagated. * `insn`: The instruction to be propagated. * `PM_read_write`: The propagation mode. * `vprop_gen`: The propagation generator. * `ptr = gen_reg_rtx(Pmode);`" GCC,nvptx,199,"The next statement after the `if` block will be the `error` function call. The `if` block will be executed if both `flag_openacc` and `optval` are true. If either of these conditions is false, the `error` function will not be called. The `error` function takes two arguments: a string literal and a string representing the name of the option that caused the error. In this case, the string literal is ``, and the option name is `optname`. Therefore, the next statement after the `if`" GCC,nvptx,200,"The next statement after the `if` block will be the `error` function call. The `if` block will be executed if both `flag_openacc` and `optval` are true. If either of these conditions is false, the `error` function will not be called. The `error` function takes two arguments: a string literal and a string representing the name of the option that caused the error. In this case, the string literal is ``, and the option name is `optname`. Therefore, the next statement after the `if`" GCC,nvptx,201,"The next statement after the given code snippet is: fprintf(file, ); Explanation: The given code snippet is a part of a larger function that is responsible for writing a variable declaration to a file. The snippet is responsible for writing the variable's name and its size, if it has one. The placeholder is used to represent a string literal that is not specified in the code snippet. The next statement after the given code snippet is fprintf(file, ), which writes the variable'" GCC,nvptx,202,"The next statement after the `if` block is `write_var_marker(file, false, TREE_PUBLIC(decl), name);`." GCC,nvptx,203,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `if ( cfun->machine->has_simtreg )`" GCC,nvptx,204,"Based on the code snippet you provided, it appears to be writing data to a file. The `write_worker_buffer` function is called with various parameters, and then the `write_var_marker` function is called with different parameters depending on the value of `need_softstack_decl` and `need_unisimt_decl`. It's difficult to predict the exact output of this code without knowing the specific values of the variables and the implementation of the `write_worker_buffer` and `write_var_marker` functions. However, it's likely that the output will" GCC,nvptx,205,"It's difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it appears to be a part of a larger program and the context is not provided. However, based on the syntax and the fact that the snippet is part of a function, it is likely that the next statement will be a return statement or a call to another function. Without more information, it's not possible to provide a more specific answer. If you have any additional context or details about the program, I may be able to provide a more accurate prediction." GCC,nvptx,206,"It's difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it appears to be a part of a larger program and the context is not provided. However, based on the syntax and the fact that the snippet is part of a function, it is likely that the next statement will be a return statement or a call to another function. Without more information, it's not possible to provide a more specific answer. If you have any additional context or details about the program, I may be able to provide a more accurate prediction." GCC,nvptx,207,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet as it appears to be part of a larger function and the context is not provided. However, based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the next statement could be one of the following: 1. `emit_insn ( nvptx_gen_shuffle ( tmp0 , tmp0 , idx , kind ) ) ;` 2. `emit_insn ( nvptx_gen_shuffle ( tmp1 , tmp1 , idx , kind ) ) ;` 3. `emit_insn ( nv" GCC,nvptx,208,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `if ( dims [ GOMP_DIM_WORKER ] > PTX_WORKER_LENGTH ) {`" GCC,nvptx,209,"The next statement in this code snippet is: `dims[GOMP_DIM_WORKER] = PTX_WORKER_LENGTH;`" GCC,nvptx,210,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet without knowing the context in which it is being executed. The code appears to be setting up various flags and variables related to the OpenACC programming model, but the specifics of what it is doing and why are not clear from this snippet alone. The code is using a number of variables and functions that are not defined in this snippet, so it is likely that there is additional code elsewhere that is relevant to understanding what this code is doing. Additionally, the code is using a number of macros and constants that are not defined in this snippet, so it is" GCC,nvptx,211,"The next statement of this code snippet is: fprintf ( asm_out_file , ) ; Explanation: The code snippet is part of a function that is responsible for generating assembly code for a particular instruction. The function takes a number of parameters, including the output file, the instruction, and the register number. The code snippet starts by checking if the instruction has a static chain (i.e., a chain of static variables that are used in the instruction). If it does, the function prints out the static chain using the `fprintf`" GCC,nvptx,212,"This code snippet is part of a function that is generating assembly code for a target machine. The function is using the `fprintf` function to print out assembly code to a file. The first `fprintf` statement is printing out a string literal that includes a format specifier for a register name, followed by three integer values: `bits`, `regno`, and `regno`. The second `fprintf` statement is printing out a string literal that includes a format specifier for a register name, followed by two integer values: `bits`, and `regno`. The third `fprintf`" GCC,nvptx,213,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific inputs and the behavior of the functions called within the code. However, based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the next statement will be the execution of the `iterator` function for each bit that is set in the `live` bitmap. The `EXECUTE_IF_SET_IN_BITMAP` macro is used to iterate over the bits that are set in the `live` bitmap, and for each bit that is set, the `iterator` function is called with the corresponding index `" GCC,nvptx,214,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `gcc_assert ( ! ( mask & GOMP_DIM_MASK ( GOMP_DIM_WORKER ) ) || ( mask & GOMP_DIM_MASK ( GOMP_DIM_VECTOR ) ) ) ;` This statement is an assertion that checks if the `mask` variable, which represents the dimensions of the parallel loop, does not contain the `GOMP_DIM_WORKER` dimension or if it contains the `GOMP_DIM_VECTOR` dimension. If" GCC,nvptx,215,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet without knowing the specific values of the variables and the context in which the code is being executed. However, based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the next statement will be the assignment of a value to the variable `mask`. The code is using a bitwise OR operator (`|`) to set the bits of the `mask` variable based on the values of other variables and constants." GCC,nvptx,216,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return PTX_VECTOR_LENGTH;` This statement returns the value of the `PTX_VECTOR_LENGTH` constant, which is a predefined constant in the NVIDIA CUDA programming model that represents the vector length of the current thread block. The `nvptx_simt_vf` function is a built-in function in the NVIDIA CUDA programming model that returns the vector length of the current thread block." GCC,nvptx,217,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the code depends on various factors such as the input data, the specific hardware and software environment, and the execution context. However, based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the function `nvptx_simt_vf` is a kernel function that is executed on a GPU device. The function takes no arguments and returns an integer value. Without additional information about the specific implementation of the function and the context in which it is executed, it is not possible to provide a more specific" GCC,nvptx,218,"The next statement is: `HOST_WIDE_INT &simtsz = cfun->machine->simt_stack_size;`" GCC,nvptx,219,"The next statement of this code snippet is: fprintf ( file , , s . str ( ) . c_str ( ) ) ; This statement is printing the contents of the stringstream s to the file, using the format string ." GCC,nvptx,220,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet without knowing the specific values of the variables and the context in which the code is being executed. However, based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the next statement will be the `break` statement at the end of the `switch` block. The `switch` block is checking the value of the `code` variable, which is an enumeration of instruction codes. The `case` statements are checking the value of `code` against specific instruction codes, and the `break` statement is used to exit the `switch` block when a match is" GCC,nvptx,221,"Based on the code snippet you provided, it appears to be part of a function that is generating assembly code for a memory access operation. The code is checking if the memory address is aligned to a certain boundary, and if not, it is adjusting the address to ensure that it is aligned. The next statement of the code snippet you provided is: `start_sequence ( ) ;` This statement is starting a new sequence of assembly code instructions. The sequence will be used to generate the assembly code for the memory access operation." GCC,nvptx,222,"This code snippet is part of the GCC compiler and is related to the NVPTX target. It appears to be generating code for a broadcast instruction. The code is creating a temporary register `tmp` and starting a sequence of instructions. It then checks if the `pm` variable has the `PM_read` flag set, and if so, it generates an instruction to select a value based on the value of `reg` and a constant. Next, it generates an instruction to cast the value in `tmp` to a wider mode, based on the value of `pm` and `rep`." GCC,nvptx,223,"The next statement is: `gsi_insert_seq_before (&gsi, init_seq, GSI_SAME_STMT);`" GCC,nvptx,224,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `gimple_seq_add_stmt (&seq, cond_stmt);` This statement adds the `cond_stmt` to the sequence `seq`. The `cond_stmt` is a `gimple` statement that represents a conditional expression, and it is used to check whether the `tid` variable is equal to zero. If the `tid` variable is equal to zero, then the `cond_stmt` will evaluate to true, and the `if` statement will be executed. Otherwise, the `cond_stmt` will evaluate to" GCC,nvptx,225,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be: `init_machine_status = nvptx_init_machine_status;` This is because the code snippet is setting up various options and flags for the NVPTX target, and the `init_machine_status` variable is being set to the value of the `nvptx_init_machine_status` function, which is likely to be a function that initializes the machine status for the NVPTX target." GCC,nvptx,226,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `nvptx_wpropagate ( false , is_call , par -> forked_block , par -> forked_insn ) ;` This statement calls the `nvptx_wpropagate` function with the arguments `false`, `is_call`, `par -> forked_block`, and `par -> forked_insn`. The function is not defined in the code snippet, so its behavior is unknown." GCC,nvptx,227,"The next statement of this code snippet is: emit_insn ( gen_rtx_SET ( pred, gen_rtx_NE ( BImode, idx, const0_rtx ) ) ) ;" GCC,nvptx,228,"The code snippet you provided is a part of a larger function that appears to be related to memory management and garbage collection. It's difficult to determine the exact purpose of the code without more context, but based on the variable names and the operations being performed, it appears to be related to the following: 1. Allocating memory for a new object. 2. Initializing the object with a specific value. 3. Storing the object in a memory location. 4. Checking if the object has been initialized with a specific value. 5. If the object has been initialized, then it is" GCC,nvptx,229,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet without knowing the specific values of the variables and constants used in the code. However, based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the next statement will be the initialization of the `mask` variable with the value of `GOMP_DIM_MASK(ix)`." GCC,nvptx,230,"The next statement is likely to be: `oacc_set_fn_attrib (current_function_decl, attr);` This is because the code is setting the function attribute for the current function using the `oacc_set_fn_attrib` function, which takes two arguments: the function declaration and the attribute to be set. The `attr` variable is being used to store the attribute value, which is obtained using the `oacc_get_fn_attrib` function." GCC,nvptx,231,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be the return statement, which returns the value of the `nvptx_propagate` function call. The `nvptx_propagate` function is called with the `is_call`, `block`, and `insn` arguments, and the `PM_read_write` and `vprop_gen` constants as additional arguments. The `` placeholder is likely to be replaced with a numerical literal value when the function is called." GCC,nvptx,232,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `if (data.offset) {`" GCC,nvptx,233,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return nvptx_expand_shuffle ( exp , target , mode , ignore ) ;` This is because the `switch` statement is checking the value of `DECL_FUNCTION_CODE ( fndecl )`, which is a built-in function code, and the `case` statements are checking for specific values of this function code. If the value of `DECL_FUNCTION_CODE ( fndecl )` matches one of the `case` statements, the corresponding code block will be executed. In" GCC,nvptx,234,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet without knowing the specific inputs and the implementation of the functions being called. However, based on the code snippet you provided, it appears that the next statement will be the `return` statement inside the `NVPTX_BUILTIN_CMP_SWAP` or `NVPTX_BUILTIN_CMP_SWAPLL` case. The `nvptx_expand_cmp_swap` function is called with the `exp`, `target`, `mode`, and `ignore` arguments, and it is" GCC,nvptx,235,The next statement after the `for` loop is `if ( ! brackets.length() )`. GCC,nvptx,236,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the code depends on the specific values of the variables and the state of the program at the time the code is executed. However, based on the code snippet provided, it is likely that the next statement will be a reference to the `insn` variable, which is a pointer to an `rtx_insn` structure. The code may be trying to access or modify the contents of the `rtx_insn` structure, or it may be using the pointer to perform some other operation. Without more" GCC,nvptx,237,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `INSN_P ( insn )` This is because the `FOR_BB_INSNS` macro iterates over the instructions in the basic block `bb`, and for each instruction, it checks if it is an `INSN_P` (i.e., a non-label instruction). If the current instruction is an `INSN_P`, the macro returns the instruction." GCC,nvptx,238,"The next statement in the code snippet is: `bb_sese ( unsigned node_ , unsigned p , int dir_ ) : node ( node_ ) , parent ( p ) , dir ( dir_ ) {` This is a constructor for a class called `bb_sese`. It takes three arguments: `node_`, `p`, and `dir_`. The constructor initializes the `node` and `parent` members of the class to the values of `node_` and `p`, respectively, and the `dir` member to the value of `dir_`." GCC,nvptx,239,"The next statement in the code snippet is: `bb_sese ( unsigned node_ , unsigned p , int dir_ ) : node ( node_ ) , parent ( p ) , dir ( dir_ ) {` This is a constructor for a class called `bb_sese`. It takes three arguments: `node_`, `p`, and `dir_`. The constructor initializes the `node` and `parent` members of the class to the values of `node_` and `p`, respectively, and the `dir` member to the value of `dir_`." GCC,nvptx,240,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the code depends on the specific values of the variables and the implementation of the `bracket` function. However, based on the information provided, it is likely that the next statement will be an assignment to the `color` field of the `back` object, using the value of the `~ ` expression as the new value." GCC,nvptx,241,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the code depends on the specific values of the variables and the implementation of the `bracket` function. However, based on the information provided, it is likely that the next statement will be an assignment to the `color` field of the `back` object, using the value of the `~ ` expression as the new value." GCC,nvptx,242,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `res = first;` This is because the `default_ptx_version_option` function is returning the `first` variable, which is the first PTX version that supports the specified ISA. The `res` variable is assigned the value of `first`, and the function returns `res`." GCC,nvptx,243,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `gcc_assert ( first <= res ) ;` This statement is an assertion that checks if the value of `first` is less than or equal to the value of `res`. If this condition is not met, the assertion will fail and the program will abort." GCC,nvptx,244,"The next statement in the code snippet is: `case PTX_ISA_SM80 : return PTX_VERSION_7_0 ;`" GCC,nvptx,245,"The next statement in this code snippet is: `case PTX_ISA_SM80 : return PTX_VERSION_7_0 ;`" GCC,nvptx,246,"The next statement after the code snippet you provided is: `return true;` The code snippet you provided is a function that checks if a type is a record type and if it has a field that is an array type. If the type is not a record type or if it does not have a field that is an array type, the function returns `false`. Otherwise, the function returns `true`." GCC,nvptx,247,"The next statement after the `if` block would be the `return false` statement. So, if the `TREE_CODE` of `last_field_type` is not `ARRAY_TYPE`, the function will return `false`." GCC,nvptx,248,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be the body of the `FOR_ALL_BB_FN` loop, which is defined as a macro in the `gcc` header file `basic-block.h`. The `FOR_ALL_BB_FN` macro is used to iterate over all the basic blocks in a function, and the `block` parameter is a pointer to the current basic block being processed. The `cfun` parameter is a pointer to the current function being processed. The body of the `FOR_ALL_BB_FN` loop is likely to" GCC,nvptx,249,"The next statement of this code snippet is: BB_SET_SESE ( block , ) ; This is because the FOR_ALL_BB_FN macro is iterating over all the basic blocks in the control flow graph of the function, and for each basic block, it is clearing the BB_VISITED flag and setting the BB_SESE flag to the value specified by ." GCC,nvptx,250,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific values of the variables and the behavior of the functions being called. However, based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the next statement will be: `worklist.safe_push(insn_bb_t(insn, block));` This is because the `if` statement that precedes this line checks whether `seen_insn` is true, and if it is, it pushes the `insn_bb_t` object onto the `worklist` queue" GCC,nvptx,251,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet without knowing the context and the specific implementation of the functions and data structures being used. However, based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the next statement after the `if` statement would be the `else` statement, which would execute if `seen_insn` is false. Within the `else` statement, the code would execute the following lines: * `map -> get_or_insert ( block ) = insn ;` * `seen_insn = true ;` The first line of code would" GCC,nvptx,252,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `if ( dump_file && ( dump_flags & TDF_DETAILS ) )` This is a conditional statement that checks if the `dump_file` variable is not NULL and if the `dump_flags` variable has the `TDF_DETAILS` flag set. If both conditions are true, then the code inside the `if` block will be executed." GCC,nvptx,253,"The code snippet is initializing a register to a constant value if it is not already initialized. The first part of the code checks if there is a false value in the bitmap `DF_LIVE_OUT` for any of the predecessor edges of the basic block `bb`. If there is a false value, the variable `have_false` is set to true. If there is a true value, the variable `have_true` is set to true. The second part of the code checks if `have_false` and `have_true` are both true. If they are," GCC,nvptx,254,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `sese->push(pseudo_node_t(target, usd * t_sese->dir));` This statement is inside the `if` block that checks if `t_sese` is not null, and it is executed if the condition `t_sese->node < sese->node + dir && !(dir < && sese->parent == t_sese->node)` is true. The statement pushes a new `pseudo_node_t` object onto" GCC,nvptx,255,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the value of the string literal ``. However, based on the code snippet, it is likely that the next statement will be a call to a function that takes a string as an argument, and the string will be the value of the `sep` variable." GCC,nvptx,256,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return comment;`" GCC,nvptx,257,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific values of the variables and the implementation of the `color_counts` object. However, based on the code provided, it appears that the next statement will be: `color_counts.quick_push()` This is because the `length()` method is called on the `color_counts` object, which returns the number of elements in the object. The `quick_push()` method is then called on the `color_counts` object with" GCC,nvptx,258,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be: `color_counts.quick_push();` This is because the `if` statement checks whether `length` is not equal to `size`, and if it is not, it sets `size` to `length` and pushes a new element onto the `color_counts` vector. The `quick_push` method is used to add a new element to the end of the vector, and the value being pushed is ``." GCC,nvptx,259,"The next statement after the `if` statement is: `r->n_allocated++;`" GCC,nvptx,260,"This code snippet is checking if the PTX version specified by the user is supported by the current GPU architecture. If the PTX version is not supported, it will print an error message indicating the minimum PTX version required for the specified GPU architecture. The next statement of this code snippet will be: `if (ptx_version_option < first) {` This statement checks if the PTX version specified by the user is less than the minimum PTX version required for the specified GPU architecture. If this condition is true, the code will execute the error handling block." GCC,nvptx,261,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return htab_hash_pointer ( t ) ;` This statement returns the result of the `htab_hash_pointer` function, which is a hash value calculated from the pointer `t`. The return type of this function is `hashval_t`, which is a type defined in the `htab` library." GCC,nvptx,262,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be a check for the partition level of the function being called. The code is checking if the function being called has the `oacc_fn_attrib_level` attribute set to a non-null value, and if so, it is extracting the value of that attribute. Here is the predicted next statement: ``` if (partition_level == NULL_TREE) return false; ``` This statement checks if the `partition_level` variable is null, and if so, it returns false. If the `partition_level" GCC,nvptx,263,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of the code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific values of the variables and the behavior of the functions being called. However, based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the next statement will be: `max_workers = oa.num_workers;` This is because the `else` clause of the `if` statement is executed when the condition `oa.num_workers > 0` is false, which means that the `max_workers` variable will be assigned the value of `oa.num_" GCC,nvptx,264,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `max_workers = PTX_CTA_SIZE / oa.vector_length;` This statement assigns the value of `PTX_CTA_SIZE / oa.vector_length` to the variable `max_workers`. The `PTX_CTA_SIZE` constant is defined in the CUDA header file and represents the maximum number of threads that can be executed in a single CTA (Compute Thread Array). The `oa.vector_length` is the length of the vector that is being processed by" GCC,nvptx,265,"The next statement of this code snippet is: fprintf(file, , POINTER_SIZE, reg_names[regno]);" GCC,nvptx,266,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be a call to `fprintf` with the same format string and arguments as the previous call, but with a different value for the `size` parameter. The first argument to `fprintf` is a file pointer, which is likely to be the same as the previous call. The second argument is a format string, which is either `` or `` depending on the value of the `size` parameter. The third argument is `POINTER_SIZE`, which is likely to be a constant value. The fourth and" GCC,nvptx,267,"It's difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet without knowing the context in which it is being used. The code appears to be printing out some information related to a stack frame, but it's not clear what the specific purpose of the code is or what the variables and constants represent. Without more information, it's not possible to accurately predict the next statement of this code snippet." GCC,nvptx,268,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the `maybe_split_mode` function is not specified. However, based on the name of the function and the fact that it takes a `machine_mode` parameter, it is likely that the function is intended to split a machine mode into two or more parts. Without knowing the specific implementation of the `maybe_split_mode` function, it is difficult to predict exactly what the next statement of the code snippet will be. However, some possible next statements could include: * A call to" GCC,nvptx,269,"The next statement after the `if` statement in the code snippet is the `return` statement. The `return` statement will return the result of the `GET_MODE_INNER` function, which is the inner mode of the complex mode `mode`." GCC,nvptx,270,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return false;` Explanation: The code snippet is checking if the `insn` is not a valid instruction (i.e., `!INSN_P(insn)`) and if it is not, it returns `false`. If the `insn` is valid, it checks the recognition memoized value of the instruction (i.e., `recog_memoized(insn)`) and based on the value, it returns `false` for certain cases and `true` for the default case." GCC,nvptx,271,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `dims[GOMP_DIM_VECTOR] = PTX_WARP_SIZE;` This is because the condition `dims[GOMP_DIM_WORKER] > && dims[GOMP_DIM_VECTOR] > && dims[GOMP_DIM_WORKER] * dims[GOMP_DIM_VECTOR] > PTX_CTA_SIZE` is true, and the body" GCC,nvptx,272,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `fprintf ( file, ) ;` This statement is calling the `fprintf` function to write a string literal to the file. The string literal is represented by ``, which is a placeholder for a string literal that will be provided by the caller. The `fprintf` function will write the string literal to the file, followed by a newline character." GCC,nvptx,273,"The next statement in this code snippet is: `nvptx_assemble_decl_begin ( file , name , , type , obj_size , TYPE_ALIGN ( type ) ) ;` This statement is calling the `nvptx_assemble_decl_begin` function, which is part of the NVPTX assembly language. The function takes several arguments, including the file to write to, the name of the variable being declared, a string literal representing the type of the variable, the type of the variable, the size of the" GCC,nvptx,274,"The next statement in this code snippet is: `TREE_ASM_WRITTEN ( name ) = ;` This statement assigns a value to the `TREE_ASM_WRITTEN` field of the `name` variable, which is a `tree` object. The value being assigned is a numerical literal, represented by ``." GCC,nvptx,275,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `fputs(s.str().c_str(), stream);` This statement writes the contents of the `stringstream` object `s` to the output stream `stream`. The `fputs` function takes a null-terminated string as its first argument, and the `c_str()` method of the `stringstream` object returns a null-terminated string representation of the stream's contents." GCC,nvptx,276,"The next statement of this code snippet is: init_frag.size = elt_size; This is because the previous line of code sets the value of elt_size to be the size of the element type, and the next line of code initializes the size of the init_frag structure to be the same as the size of the element type." GCC,nvptx,277,"The next statement of this code snippet is: init_frag.size = elt_size; Explanation: The code snippet is initializing a data structure called ""init_frag"". The ""size"" field of this structure is being set to the value of ""elt_size"", which is a variable that represents the size of an element in a data structure. The ""elt_size"" variable is calculated based on the type of the data structure and the size of the elements in the structure. The next statement after the code snippet you provided is the initialization of the """ GCC,nvptx,278,"The next statement of this code snippet is: fprintf(asm_out_file, init_frag.started ? : ); Explanation: The code snippet is a part of a function that is responsible for assembling a declaration end in the NVPTX target. The function first checks if the offset of the init fragment is non-zero, and if so, it assembles a value using the nvptx_assemble_value function. Then, it prints a string literal to the assembly output file using" GCC,nvptx,279,"It's difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet without knowing the context in which it is being executed. However, based on the code snippet provided, it appears to be part of a switch statement that is handling different types of values. The next statement after the code snippet you provided would depend on the value of the `x` variable, which is not specified in the code snippet you provided. If `x` is a constant, the next statement would be the `case CONST` statement. If `x` is a symbol reference, the next statement would be the `case SYMBOL_REF" GCC,nvptx,280,"The next statement after `fprintf(file, ); tree size = DECL_SIZE_UNIT(decl);` is likely to be `fprintf(file, ""%zu"", tree_size);`. The `fprintf` function is used to write a formatted string to a file. The first argument is the file pointer, the second argument is the format string, and the third argument is the value to be printed. In this case, the format string is ``, which is a string literal that represents a format string for a size value in bytes. The" GCC,nvptx,281,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `init_frag.offset += part;` This statement is adding the value of `part` to the `offset` field of the `init_frag` structure." GCC,nvptx,282,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `for (unsigned part = ; size; size -= part) {` This line of code initializes a loop that will iterate over the value `size` in chunks of size `part`, where `part` is initially set to ``. The loop will continue until `size` is reduced to 0. Within the loop, the code will check if `part * BITS_PER_UNIT == HOST_BITS_PER_WIDE_INT`, and if so" GCC,nvptx,283,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return nvptx_builtin_decls[code];` This statement returns the built-in declaration for the given code, which is stored in the `nvptx_builtin_decls` array. If the code is not a valid built-in, the `error_mark_node` is returned instead." GCC,nvptx,284,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `cfun->machine->num_args++;`" GCC,nvptx,285,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `gcc_checking_assert ( GET_CODE ( addr ) == SYMBOL_REF ) ;` This is because the code is checking the address of the call instruction to see if it is a symbol reference. If the address is not a symbol reference, then the assertion will fail." GCC,nvptx,286,"The next statement after the `switch` statement would be the `default` case, which returns `false`." GCC,nvptx,287,"The next statement after the given code snippet would be the `return` statement. The `return` statement is used to return a value from a function. In this case, the function is returning the value `true` to indicate that the given code snippet is valid. Here's the complete code snippet with the `return` statement: ``` case CODE_FOR_nvptx_shufflesf : case CODE_FOR_nvptx_barsync : case CODE_FOR_nvptx_fork : case CODE_FOR" GCC,nvptx,288,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return false;` This statement is the last statement in the `nvptx_can_change_mode_class` function, and it returns `false` to indicate that the function cannot change the mode class." GCC,nvptx,289,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `if ( XEXP ( x , ) == pc_rtx && GET_CODE ( XEXP ( x , ) ) == LABEL_REF ) return XEXP ( x , ) ;` This statement checks if the expression `XEXP ( x , )` is equal to `pc_rtx` and if the code of the expression is `LABEL_REF`. If both conditions are true, it" GCC,nvptx,290,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return basic_align;` The `if` statement checks if the size of the type is equal to the size of the `TImode` mode. If it is, the function returns the bit size of the `TImode` mode. Otherwise, the function returns the `basic_align` value." GCC,nvptx,291,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific input and the implementation of the `write_var_marker` function. However, based on the code snippet you provided, it appears that the next statement will be a call to `fprintf` with a format string and a variable number of arguments. The format string is likely to be a string literal, and the arguments are likely to be values related to the `decl` variable. Without more information about the context in which this code is being executed, it is not possible to provide a more specific prediction" GCC,nvptx,292,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific inputs and the implementation of the `write_var_marker` and `fprintf` functions. However, based on the code snippet, it appears that the next statement will be a call to the `fprintf` function with a format string and a variable number of arguments. The format string will depend on the value of the `TREE_PUBLIC` macro and the `DECL_WEAK` macro, and the variable arguments will depend on the value of the `decl` variable." GCC,nvptx,293,"The next statement after the `default` label is the `break` statement, which will cause the program to exit the `switch` block and continue executing the code after the `switch` statement." GCC,nvptx,294,"The next statement is likely to be another call to `fprintf` with the `dump_file` file pointer as the first argument, followed by a string literal and possibly some other arguments. The exact statement cannot be determined without knowing the contents of the string literals and the value of the `nvptx_dump_pars` function." GCC,nvptx,295,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be a call to the `gcc_assert` function, which is a macro provided by the GNU Compiler Collection (GCC) that evaluates the given expression and aborts the program if the expression is false. In this case, the expression being evaluated is `block->preds->length() == `, which checks whether the length of the `preds` list of the `block` object is equal to the value of the `` constant. If the expression is false, the program will abort with an error" GCC,nvptx,296,"This code snippet is part of the GCC compiler and is used to predict the next statement in a basic block. The code is using the GCC's built-in assertions to check the length of the predecessor list of a basic block, and then iterating over the predecessor blocks to find the last instruction that matches a certain condition. The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be the return statement, which returns the last instruction that matches the condition." GCC,nvptx,297,"The next statement of this code snippet is: fprintf ( dump_file , ) ; This is because the previous statement, which was a call to fprintf, has a semicolon at the end, indicating that it is a complete statement. The next statement is a call to fprintf again, with a different format string and a different set of arguments." GCC,nvptx,298,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `emit_insn ( gen_nvptx_fork ( op ) ) ;` This statement emits an instruction to the assembler to generate a fork instruction with the given operands. The `gen_nvptx_fork` function is a helper function that generates the fork instruction for the NVPTX target. The `op` variable is passed as an argument to the function, which contains the mask and is_call values that were previously computed." GCC,nvptx,299,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `rtx op = GEN_INT ( mask | ( is_call << GOMP_DIM_MAX ) ) ;` This statement is assigning the result of the bitwise OR operation between `mask` and the result of the left shift operation between `is_call` and `GOMP_DIM_MAX` to the variable `op`. The `GEN_INT` function is used to generate an integer value from the result of the bitwise OR operation." GCC,nvptx,300,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `mask &= ( GOMP_DIM_MASK ( GOMP_DIM_WORKER ) | GOMP_DIM_MASK ( GOMP_DIM_VECTOR ) ) ;` This statement is a bitwise AND operation that sets the bits of `mask` to 1 if the corresponding bits of `GOMP_DIM_MASK ( GOMP_DIM_WORKER )` and `GOMP_DIM_MASK ( GOMP_DIM_VECTOR )` are" GCC,nvptx,301,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `SET_SYMBOL_DATA_AREA ( XEXP ( rtl , ) , area ) ;` This statement sets the data area of the symbol represented by `rtl` to `area`, which is determined by the previous `if` statement. If `DECL_INITIAL ( decl )` is true, then `area` is set to `DATA_AREA_SHARED`. Otherwise, if `TREE_READONLY ( decl )` is true, then `area`" GCC,nvptx,302,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `cfun` and `machine` objects, as well as the context in which this code is being executed. However, based on the syntax and the fact that `doing_call` is being set to `false`, it is likely that this code is part of a function that is being called, and that the `doing_call` variable is being used to indicate that the function is currently being executed. Without more information about the context in which this code is" GCC,nvptx,303,"The next statement after the `free_EXPR_LIST_list` function call is likely to be a `return` statement, as the `free_EXPR_LIST_list` function is used to free the memory allocated for the `call_args` list, and the function is likely to return control to the caller after this operation is complete. Here is an example of what the next statement might look like: ``` return; ``` This statement will return control to the caller of the function, and the function will exit." GCC,nvptx,304,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `emit_insn ( gen_nvptx_membar_gl ( ) ) ;` This is because the `case` statement is checking the value of `code`, and if it is equal to `NVPTX_BUILTIN_MEMBAR_GL`, it will execute the code inside the `case` block, which is the `emit_insn` statement." GCC,nvptx,305,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return nvptx_expand_shuffle ( exp , target , mode , ignore ) ;` This is because the `switch` statement is checking the value of `DECL_MD_FUNCTION_CODE ( fndecl )`, which is the metadata function code of the function being called, and it is currently set to `NVPTX_BUILTIN_SHUFFLE` or `NVPTX_BUILTIN_SHUFFLELL`. The `case` statement for these values is `" GCC,nvptx,306,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `emit_call_insn (pat);` This is the final statement of the code snippet, and it emits the call instruction represented by the `pat` variable to the assembly code." GCC,nvptx,307,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific values of the variables and the behavior of the `expand_expr` function. However, based on the context and the fact that the code is expanding expressions, it is likely that the next statement will be another call to `expand_expr` or a similar function to expand another expression. Alternatively, the next statement could be a comparison or assignment statement that uses the values of the `mem`, `cmp`, and `src` variables. Without more context, it is not possible to determine the exact" GCC,nvptx,308,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `rtx cmp = gen_rtx_fmt_ee ( GET_CODE ( compare ) , BImode , XEXP ( compare , ) , XEXP ( compare , ) ) ;` This statement is generating a new rtx `cmp` by calling the function `gen_rtx_fmt_ee` with the code of the `compare` rtx, the mode `BImode`, and the two operands of the `compare` rtx. The function" GCC,nvptx,309,"The code snippet is generating a register transfer expression (RTX) for a comparison operation. The `gen_reg_rtx` function is used to generate a new register with the specified mode (in this case, `BImode`, which is a 64-bit integer mode). The `gen_rtx_fmt_ee` function is used to generate an RTX for the comparison operation, with the specified code (which is the code of the `compare` RTX), mode, and operands. The `emit_insn` function is then used to emit the generated RTX as an instruction" GCC,nvptx,310,"The next statement after the given code snippet is likely to be a call to the `GOMP_DIM_MASK` function, which is used to generate a mask for the dimensions of the parallel region. The `GOMP_DIM_MASK` function takes a single argument, which is the mode of the parallel region, and returns a mask that indicates which dimensions are active in the region. The `nvptx_emit_forking` function is used to emit a forking instruction that creates a new thread for each dimension in the parallel region. The `false` argument passed to" GCC,nvptx,311,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `nvptx_emit_joining(GOMP_DIM_MASK(mode), false);`" GCC,nvptx,312,"The next statement after the given code snippet is likely to be a call to the `nvptx_emit_joining` function, which is a part of the NVIDIA CUDA compiler. The function takes two arguments: a bitmask indicating the dimensions to be joined, and a boolean value indicating whether the join should be done in a new thread. The `GOMP_DIM_MASK` macro is used to generate a bitmask for the dimensions to be joined. The `mode` argument is a bitmask that specifies the dimensions to be joined. The `false` argument indicates" GCC,nvptx,313,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `rtx dest = expand_expr ( CALL_EXPR_ARG ( exp , + 1 ) , NULL_RTX , mode , EXPAND_NORMAL ) ;`" GCC,nvptx,314,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be: `if ( ! REG_P ( op ) && GET_CODE ( op ) != CONST_INT ) op = copy_to_mode_reg ( SImode , op ) ;` This is because the code is checking if the `op` operand is a register or a constant integer, and if it is not, it is copying it to a register. The same logic is applied to the `idx` operand in the previous line." GCC,nvptx,315,"The next statement is likely to be: fputs ( , asm_out_file ) ; This is because the previous statement is a call to fprintf, which writes a formatted string to the output file, and the next statement is a call to fputs, which writes a string to the output file. The placeholder is likely to be replaced with a string literal that is specific to the context of the code snippet." GCC,nvptx,316,"The next statement is likely to be: fputs("" PTX ISA version: "", asm_out_file); Explanation: The code snippet is using the `fputs` function to write a string to the `asm_out_file`. The first argument to `fputs` is a string literal, which is the string to be written. The second argument is the file pointer to the output file. The first `fputs` call writes the string "" PTX ISA version: "" to the output file. The second `fputs" GCC,nvptx,317,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `par -> fork_insn = nvptx_discover_pre ( block , CODE_FOR_nvptx_fork ) ;` This is because the `case` statement is currently evaluating the `CODE_FOR_nvptx_fork` case, and the next statement to be executed is the assignment of the `fork_insn` field of the `par` structure to the result of the `nvptx_discover_pre` function called with the `block` and `" GCC,nvptx,318,"Based on the code snippet you provided, it appears to be a part of a function that is responsible for generating a control flow graph for a program. The function takes a set of basic blocks as input and outputs a control flow graph. The code snippet you provided appears to be iterating over the basic blocks and performing some operations on each block. The operations include: 1. Checking if the block has a SESE (Single Entry Single Exit) property. If it does, the block is skipped. 2. If the block does not have a SESE property, the function calculates the depth of" GCC,nvptx,319,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return nvptx_function_arg_reg (cumulative_args, arg);` This is because the `nvptx_function_arg` function is defined to return the result of calling the `nvptx_function_arg_reg` function with the `cumulative_args` and `arg` parameters." GCC,nvptx,320,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the program depends on the specific implementation of the `get_cumulative_args` function and the value of the `cum_v` variable. However, based on the name of the function and the variable, it is likely that the function returns a pointer to a structure that contains information about the cumulative arguments passed to the program, and the `cum_v` variable is used to store this information. Therefore, the next statement of the code snippet is likely to be a statement" GCC,nvptx,321,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `cum_v.num_args++;`" GCC,nvptx,322,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return GET_MODE_ALIGNMENT ( mode );` This statement returns the alignment of the `mode` argument, which is a `machine_mode` value. The `GET_MODE_ALIGNMENT` macro is used to retrieve the alignment of the `mode` argument, which is a power of 2 that is used to align the argument on a boundary in memory. The return value of this function is the alignment of the `mode` argument, which is used to determine the alignment of the function's arguments." GCC,nvptx,323,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return GET_MODE_ALIGNMENT ( mode );` This statement returns the alignment of the `mode` argument, which is a `machine_mode` value. The `GET_MODE_ALIGNMENT` macro is used to retrieve the alignment of the `mode` argument, which is a power of 2 that is used to align the argument on a boundary in memory. The return value of this function is the alignment of the `mode` argument, which is used to determine the alignment of the function's arguments." GCC,nvptx,324,"The next statement of this code snippet is: fprintf(file, ); This statement is a call to the fprintf function, which is used to write a string to a file. The first argument to fprintf is the file to write to, and the second argument is the string to write. The placeholder is used to represent a string literal, which is a string that is stored in the program's memory and can be used as an argument to fprintf." GCC,nvptx,325,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be: `cum->args[cum->num_args++] = arg;` This statement is adding the current argument `arg` to the `args` array of the `cumulative_args` structure, and incrementing the `num_args` field to keep track of the number of arguments." GCC,nvptx,326,The next statement after the `if` block is `return NULL_RTX;`. GCC,nvptx,327,The next statement after `return false;` would be the end of the function or method. GCC,nvptx,328,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be a function call or a jump instruction. The `nvptx_function_ok_for_sibcall` function is a part of the GCC compiler's NVPTX backend, which is used to generate code for the NVIDIA GPU architecture. The function takes two tree arguments, which are likely to be function declarations or function pointers. The function checks whether the given function is suitable for a sibling call, which is a type of function call that is optimized for performance by avoiding the overhead of a traditional function call." GCC,nvptx,329,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return gen_rtx_REG ( mode , NVPTX_RETURN_REGNUM ) ;` This statement returns a register of the specified mode and number, which is used to store the return value of the function. The `gen_rtx_REG` function is used to generate a register with the specified properties." GCC,nvptx,330,The next statement after the `return` statement in the code snippet is the closing brace `}` of the `if` statement. GCC,nvptx,331,"The next statement of this code snippet is: return regno == NVPTX_RETURN_REGNUM;" GCC,nvptx,332,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be the assignment of the `expr` variable to the `dest_var` variable, using the `gimplify_assign` function. The `gimplify_assign` function is used to assign a value to a variable in a way that is compatible with the GIMPLE intermediate representation, which is used by the GCC compiler to represent the semantics of the program. The `gimplify_assign` function takes three arguments: the variable to be assigned, the value to be assigned, and the sequence of statements in which the assignment is to be" GCC,nvptx,333,"The next statement of this code snippet is: case V2DImode: res = gen_pack_v2di (dst, src0, src1); break;" GCC,nvptx,334,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it appears to be part of a larger program and the context is not provided. However, based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the next statement will be the assignment of a value to the variable `rep`. The value of `rep` is not explicitly defined in the code snippet, but it is likely that it will be assigned a value based on the value of `data->ptr` and the size of the mode of the register `reg`." GCC,nvptx,335,"The next statement of this code snippet is: res = gen_unpackdisi2 ( dst0 , dst1 , src ) ; This is because the switch statement is checking the mode of the src operand, and if it is in E_DImode, it will execute the code inside the case E_DImode block, which is the call to gen_unpackdisi2." GCC,nvptx,336,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return arg_pointer_rtx;`" GCC,nvptx,337,"The next statement of this code snippet is: return NULL_RTX;" GCC,nvptx,338,"The next statement after the code snippet you provided is likely to be a call to the `tree_cons` function, which creates a new tree node with the specified type and value. Here's an example of what the next statement might look like: ``` tree align = build_int_cst ( unsigned_type_node , GET_MODE_ALIGNMENT ( mode ) / BITS_PER_UNIT ) ; tree cons = tree_cons ( align , NULL_TREE , NULL_TREE ) ; ``` In this example, the `tree_cons`" GCC,nvptx,339,"The next statement after the code snippet you provided is: `return master;` This statement returns the value of the `master` variable, which is either a register or a memory location. If the `master` variable is a register, it will be returned directly. If it is a memory location, it will be loaded into a register before being returned." GCC,nvptx,340,"The next statement after the code snippet you provided is: `return master;` This statement returns the value of the `master` variable, which is either a register or a memory location. If the `master` variable is a register, it will be returned directly. If it is a memory location, it will be loaded into a register before being returned." GCC,nvptx,341,"The next statement after the code snippet you provided is: `return pred;` This is because the `?:` operator is used to return the value of `pred` if it is not null, and to generate a new register if it is null. In this case, `pred` is not null, so the value of `pred` is returned." GCC,nvptx,342,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `nvptx_globalize_label` function and the input parameters. However, based on the name of the function and the parameters, it is likely that the next statement will be related to globalizing a label in the NVPTX assembly language. Here are a few possibilities for what the next statement could be: 1. The function could be using the `FILE` parameter to write the globalized label to a file. 2. The function could be using the" GCC,nvptx,343,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `nvptx_globalize_label` function and the input parameters. However, based on the name of the function and the parameters, it is likely that the next statement will be related to globalizing a label in the NVPTX assembly language. Here are a few possibilities for what the next statement could be: 1. The function could be using the `FILE` parameter to write the globalized label to a file. 2. The function could be using the" GCC,nvptx,344,"The next statement in the code snippet is: `TREE_ADDRESSABLE (v) = ;` This statement sets the `TREE_ADDRESSABLE` field of the `v` variable to a specific value, which is represented by the placeholder ``. The `TREE_ADDRESSABLE` field is used to indicate whether a tree node is addressable, which means that it can be used as the target of a memory operation. In this case, the `v` variable is being marked as addressable, which means that it can be" GCC,nvptx,345,The next statement after the `if` block is `return decl;`. GCC,nvptx,346,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `tree id = get_identifier ( ) ;` This statement is assigning the result of the `get_identifier` function to the variable `id`. The `get_identifier` function is used to retrieve the identifier for a given string literal. In this case, the string literal is ``, which is a placeholder for a string literal that is not specified in the code snippet." GCC,nvptx,347,"This code snippet is part of the GCC compiler and is related to the OpenACC privatization feature. It appears to be handling the allocation of private memory for a variable in a parallel region. The code is checking if the variable has already been privatized, and if not, it is allocating private memory for it. The `gang_private_shared_size` variable appears to be keeping track of the total size of the private memory allocated so far, and the `gang_private_shared_align` variable appears to be keeping track of the alignment of the private memory. The code" GCC,nvptx,348,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return false;` This is because the `if` statement checks if `axis` is less than `GOMP_DIM_WORKER`, and if it is, the function returns `false`. If `axis` is greater than or equal to `GOMP_DIM_WORKER`, the function will continue executing the next statement." GCC,nvptx,349,The next statement after the `break` statement in the `case IFN_GOACC_REDUCTION_FINI` block is the `case IFN_GOACC_REDUCTION_TEARDOWN` block. GCC,nvptx,350,"The next statement in this code snippet is: case IFN_GOACC_REDUCTION_TEARDOWN: nvptx_goacc_reduction_teardown(call, &oa); break;" GCC,nvptx,351,"Based on the code snippet you provided, it appears to be a part of a function that is handling reduction operations in a parallel program. The function is using the NVIDIA CUDA programming model and is generating code for the NVIDIA PTX target. The function is taking a `gcall` object as an argument, which represents a function call in the GIMPLE intermediate representation. The function is also taking an `offload_attrs` object as an argument, which contains information about the offloading attributes of the function. The function is then extracting various information from the `g" GCC,nvptx,352,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet without knowing the specific values of the variables and the context in which the code is being executed. However, based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the next statement will be a conditional statement that checks the value of the `level` variable and the `oa->vector_length` field. If the `level` variable is equal to `GOMP_DIM_VECTOR` and the `oa->vector_length` field is equal to `PTX_WARP_SIZE`, then the code will execute a loop that performs a vector sh" GCC,nvptx,353,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet without knowing the context and the purpose of the code. However, based on the code snippet provided, it appears to be related to the implementation of a function that is part of a larger program. The code snippet defines a function that takes a `call` argument, which is a `gimple` object representing a function call, and a `level` argument, which is an integer representing the level of parallelism. The function appears to be responsible for handling the initialization of a variable that is used in the function call. The code snippet first checks" GCC,nvptx,354,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be: `gimple_seq_add_stmt ( &seq, tid_call ) ;` This statement adds the `tid_call` gimple statement to the `seq` gimple sequence. The `seq` variable is a gimple sequence that is being built up by adding gimple statements to it. The `tid_call` statement is a gimple call statement that is being added to the `seq` sequence." GCC,nvptx,355,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `gimplify_assign ( lhs , var , & seq ) ;` This statement assigns the value of `var` to `lhs`, which is a pointer to a shared memory location. The `gimplify_assign` function is used to generate the necessary code to perform the assignment. The `& seq` parameter is a pointer to a `gimple_seq` structure, which is used to store the generated code." GCC,nvptx,356,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `gsi_next ( gsi ) ;`" GCC,nvptx,357,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `gcc_assert ( dims [ GOMP_DIM_VECTOR ] != ) ;` This is a call to the `gcc_assert` macro, which is used to check that the `dims` array has a valid value for the `GOMP_DIM_VECTOR` dimension. The `` placeholder is used to represent a literal value that is not known at compile time." GCC,nvptx,358,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `if ( offload_region_p && has_vector_partitionable_routine_calls_p ( decl ) ) {` This statement checks if the current region is an offload region and if it contains any vector partitionable routine calls. If both conditions are true, then the default vector length is set to `PTX_WARP_SIZE` and the `dims` array is updated accordingly." GCC,nvptx,359,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `error ( , name ) ;` This is because the `else if` statement is only executed if the `if` statement is not true, and the `if` statement is only true if `no_add_attrs` is true. If `no_add_attrs` is true, then the `else if` statement is not executed, and the `error` function is called with the `STR_LIT` and `name` arguments." GCC,nvptx,360,"The next statement in this code snippet is: `* no_add_attrs = true ;` This statement is executed if the `TREE_CODE` of `decl` is not `VAR_DECL`. In this case, the `error` function is called with the message `` and the `name` of the variable. The `no_add_attrs` flag is then set to `true`." GCC,nvptx,361,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return nvptx_num_regs (mode, regno);` This statement returns the number of registers needed to hold a value of the specified machine mode and register number. The `nvptx_num_regs` function is called with the `mode` and `regno` arguments, and its return value is returned by the `nvptx_hard_regno_nregs` function." GCC,nvptx,362,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be a `return` statement, as the function `nvptx_hard_regno_nregs` is expected to return a value of type `unsigned int`. The value returned by this function is determined by the value of the `NUM_LIT` macro, which is not shown in the code snippet. The `NUM_LIT` macro is likely to be defined as a constant integer value, and its value is used to determine the number of registers available for a particular machine mode. Therefore, the next statement of this code" GCC,nvptx,363,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `gcc_assert(vector_red_partition * nvptx_mach_max_workers() <= vector_red_size);` This statement is an assertion that checks if the number of vector reduction partitions (i.e., `vector_red_partition`) multiplied by the maximum number of workers (i.e., `nvptx_mach_max_workers()`) is less than or equal to the size of the vector reduction (i.e., `vector_red_size`). If this condition is not" GCC,nvptx,364,"The next statement in the code snippet is likely to be a call to the `add_builtin_function` function, which is used to add a built-in function to the GCC compiler. The function takes several arguments, including the name of the function, the type of the function, and the built-in ID. The code snippet defines several built-in functions, each with a different name and type. The `SHUFFLE` function takes four `UINT` arguments and returns a `UINT` value. The `SHUFFLELL` function takes four `LLUINT`" GCC,nvptx,365,"It's not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `DEF` macro and the values of the input parameters. However, based on the syntax and the names of the variables, it appears that the code is defining a set of macros that perform various operations on arrays and pointers. The first macro, `SHUFFLELL`, appears to be a shuffle operation that takes two arrays of unsigned integers and swaps the elements at the specified indices. The second macro, `WORKER_ADDR`, appears to be a worker" GCC,nvptx,366,"The next statement of this code snippet is: return p;" GCC,nvptx,367,"The next statement of this code snippet is: return p;" GCC,nvptx,368,"The next statement in this code snippet is: fprintf ( file , ) ; This is because the previous statement, `if ( cfun -> machine -> bcast_partition ) { ... }`, is a conditional statement that only executes the code inside the curly braces if the condition is true. Since the condition is not true in this case, the code inside the curly braces is not executed, and the next statement is the one after the closing curly brace." GCC,nvptx,369,"Based on the code snippet you provided, it appears to be a part of a larger program that is using the `fprintf` function to print out some information to a file. The code is using a number of format strings and variables to control the output. Based on the information provided, it is not possible to predict the next statement of the code with certainty, as it would depend on the specific values of the variables and the format strings being used. However, some possible next statements could include: * Another call to `fprintf` with a different format string and variable arguments. * A conditional" GCC,nvptx,370,"The next statement in the code snippet is: `case CONST:` This is because the `switch` statement is checking the value of `code`, which is the result of `GET_CODE(x)`, and the next case after `REG` and `PLUS` is `CONST`." GCC,nvptx,371,"The next statement after `case PLUS` is `if ( REG_P ( XEXP ( x , ) ) && CONST_INT_P ( XEXP ( x , ) ) ) return true ;`. This statement checks if the operand of the `PLUS` instruction is a register and a constant integer. If it is, the function returns `true`. Otherwise, the function returns `false`." GCC,nvptx,372,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return gen_rtx_REG ( mode , NVPTX_RETURN_REGNUM ) ;` This is because the `if` statement checks if `cfun` is null or if `cfun->machine->doing_call` is false, and if so, it returns the result of `gen_rtx_REG ( mode , NVPTX_RETURN_REGNUM )`. If the `if` statement is not taken, the function will return the result of `gen_rtx_REG (" GCC,nvptx,373,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `if (type != NULL_TREE) return type == float_type_node || type == double_type_node; else return true;` This statement checks if the `type` variable is not equal to `NULL_TREE`. If it is not, it returns `true` if `type` is equal to either `float_type_node` or `double_type_node`. If `type` is equal to `NULL_TREE`, the function returns `true`." GCC,nvptx,374,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return false;` Explanation: The `nvptx_libgcc_floating_mode_supported_p` function checks if a given floating-point mode is supported by the NVIDIA PTX target. The function takes a `scalar_float_mode` argument, which represents a floating-point mode, and returns a boolean value indicating whether the mode is supported. In the code snippet you provided, the function first checks if the `nvptx_experimental` flag is set and the `" GCC,nvptx,375,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return false;` Explanation: The `nvptx_libgcc_floating_mode_supported_p` function checks if a given floating-point mode is supported by the NVIDIA PTX target. The function takes a `scalar_float_mode` argument, which represents a floating-point mode, and returns a boolean value indicating whether the mode is supported. In the code snippet you provided, the function first checks if the `nvptx_experimental` flag is set and the `" GCC,nvptx,376,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet without knowing the context and the purpose of the code. However, based on the code snippet provided, it appears to be related to the implementation of a lock mechanism in a program. The code snippet defines a lock expression using the `build_call_expr_loc` function, which creates a call expression with the `swap_fn` function as the callee and several other parameters. The `gimplify_assign` function is then used to assign the result of the call expression to a variable called `lock_var`. Next, the code" GCC,nvptx,377,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it appears to be part of a larger program and the context is not provided. However, based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the next statement may be related to the `gimple_seq` data structure and the `gsi` variable, which is a pointer to a `gimple_statement_iterator` structure. The code snippet appears to be creating a new `gimple_seq` structure and inserting it into the `gsi` sequence before the `lock_seq` sequence. The `" GCC,nvptx,378,"It's difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet without knowing the context in which it is being executed. However, based on the code snippet you provided, it appears to be related to the implementation of a spinlock in C. The code snippet is creating a new spinlock variable and initializing it to a specific value. It is then creating a new sequence of statements that will be executed when the spinlock is acquired. The sequence includes a call to a function named `swap_fn`, which is likely a function that swaps the values of two variables. Without more information, it'" GCC,nvptx,379,"The next statement of this code snippet is: return 1; Explanation: The `nvptx_mach_max_workers` function is defined as a static function with the `ATTRIBUTE_UNUSED` attribute, which means that the function is not used anywhere in the code. The function returns the maximum number of workers that can be used on the NVIDIA GPU architecture. In this case, the function always returns 1, indicating that only one worker can be used on the GPU." GCC,nvptx,380,"The next statement after the code snippet you provided is: return cfun -> machine -> axis_dim [ MACH_VECTOR_LENGTH ] ; This statement is returning a value from the function. The value being returned is a pointer to a machine vector, which is a structure that contains information about the machine's axis dimensions. The `MACH_VECTOR_LENGTH` macro is used to specify the length of the vector." GCC,nvptx,381,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return cfun->machine->axis_dim;`" GCC,nvptx,382,"The next statement after the `if` block is: `nvptx_record_needed_fndecl ( decl ) ;` This statement is executed if the `if` condition is true, which means that `decl` is not null and is a function declaration with the `DECL_EXTERNAL` flag set. The `nvptx_record_needed_fndecl` function is called with `decl` as an argument, which records the fact that the function is needed in the current translation unit." GCC,nvptx,383,"The next statement after the `if` block is: `nvptx_record_needed_fndecl ( decl ) ;` This statement is executed if the `if` condition is true, which means that `decl` is not null and is a function declaration with the `DECL_EXTERNAL` flag set. The `nvptx_record_needed_fndecl` function is called with `decl` as an argument, which records the fact that the function is needed in the current translation unit." GCC,nvptx,384,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `subrtx_iterator iter ( addr ) ;` This statement creates a new `subrtx_iterator` object called `iter` and initializes it with the `addr` object, which is a `const_rtx` object representing the address of the memory location being accessed. The `subrtx_iterator` class is used to iterate over the subexpressions of a `const_rtx` object, and in this case, it will iterate over the subexpressions of the `addr` object." GCC,nvptx,385,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return NULL;` Explanation: The code snippet is a function called `nvptx_mem_data_area` that takes a single argument `x` of type `const_rtx`. The function asserts that `x` is a `MEM` object, and then extracts the address of the memory location using `XEXP`. It then iterates over the subexpressions of the address using `FOR_EACH_SUBRTX`, and checks if any of the subexpressions are `SY" GCC,nvptx,386,"The code snippet you provided is part of a function that checks whether a memory address is local to the current function or not. The function is called `nvptx_mem_local_p` and it takes a `rtx` object called `mem` as an argument. The function first asserts that the `mem` object is a memory reference (i.e., `GET_CODE(mem) == MEM`). Then, it decomposes the memory address into its components using the `decompose_mem_address` function, which populates a `struct address_info` object called" GCC,nvptx,387,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `nvptx_mem_data_area` function and the value of the `x` parameter. However, based on the name of the function and the context in which it is being called, it is likely that the next statement will be a check to determine whether the memory area returned by `nvptx_mem_data_area` is shared or not. Here is a possible next statement: ``` if (area == NVPTX_DATA_A" GCC,nvptx,388,"The next statement of this code snippet is: return area == DATA_AREA_SHARED || area == DATA_AREA_GENERIC;" GCC,nvptx,389,The next statement after `return false;` would be the end of the function or method. GCC,nvptx,390,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific values of the variables and the implementation of the `strcmp` function. However, based on the pattern of the code, it is likely that the next statement will be another `if` statement comparing the result of `strcmp` with a different string literal and returning a different string literal if the comparison is true. Here is a possible next statement: ``` if ( strcmp ( name , ""Jane"" ) == 0 ) return ""Jane Doe"" ; ``` This statement" GCC,nvptx,391,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return ;` This is because the `if` statement is checking the result of `strcmp()` and if it is equal to ``, it will return ``. Since there are two `if` statements, the second one will be executed if the first one is not true." GCC,nvptx,392,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be a conditional statement that checks the value of the `worker` variable. Here's a possible next statement: ``` if (worker) { // do something } ``` This statement checks if the `worker` variable is true (i.e., if the `GOMP_DIM_WORKER` bit is set in the `mask` variable). If it is true, the code inside the `if` block will be executed." GCC,nvptx,393,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `bool large_vector = (mask & GOMP_DIM_MASK(GOMP_DIM_VECTOR)) && nvptx_mach_vector_length() != PTX_WARP_SIZE;` This statement is assigning the value of the `large_vector` variable based on the result of the bitwise AND operation between the `mask` variable and the `GOMP_DIM_MASK(GOMP_DIM_VECTOR)` constant. If the result of the AND operation is non" GCC,nvptx,394,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `bb_pair_vec_t regions;` This line declares a variable `regions` of type `bb_pair_vec_t`, which is a vector of `bb_pair` structures. The `bb_pair` structure is defined in the `nvptx_find_sese` function, which is used to find the single entry, single exit (SESE) regions in the control flow graph of the function. The `regions` vector will be used to store the SESE regions found by the `nvpt" GCC,nvptx,395,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `rtx_insn * join = inner->join_insn;` This is because the previous statement, `rtx_insn * joining = par->joining_insn;`, is a declaration and does not have any side effects. Therefore, the next statement to be executed is the assignment of `join` to `inner->join_insn`." GCC,nvptx,396,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `par->mask |= inner->mask & (GOMP_DIM_MASK(GOMP_DIM_MAX) - );` This statement updates the `mask` field of the `par` object by setting its bits to the corresponding bits of the `mask` field of the `inner` object, and then clearing the bits that correspond to the `GOMP_DIM_MAX` dimension. The `GOMP_DIM_MASK` macro is used to generate a mask that has all bits" GCC,nvptx,397,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet as it appears to be a fragment of a larger program and the context is not provided. However, based on the syntax and the variables used, it appears to be related to the configuration of a compiler or interpreter for a specific programming language. The code snippet sets various flags and variables related to the configuration of the compiler or interpreter, such as the optimization level, the data area for shared variables, and the alignment of data structures. It also defines symbols for various OpenACC constructs and diagnoses conflicts between different OpenACC directives. Without" GCC,nvptx,398,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet without knowing the context in which it is being executed. However, based on the code snippet provided, it appears to be setting up various variables and data structures for use in a program that is using the OpenACC programming model. The code snippet defines several variables, including `flag_var_tracking`, `declared_fndecls_htab`, `needed_fndecls_htab`, `declared_libfuncs_htab`, `oacc_bcast_sym`, `worker_red" GCC,nvptx,399,"The next statement of this code snippet is: fprintf ( file , , TREE_PUBLIC ( decl ) ? : ) ; This statement is a call to the fprintf function, which is used to write a formatted string to a file. The first argument is the file to write to, the second argument is the format string, and the third argument is the value to be formatted. In this case, the format string is , which is a placeholder for a string literal that will be" GCC,nvptx,400,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `nvptx_output_barrier (&operands[mem_pos], INTVAL(operands[memmodel_pos]), false);` This statement is calling the `nvptx_output_barrier` function with the address of the memory operand, the memory model operand, and a boolean value indicating whether the barrier is a load or store barrier. The `nvptx_output_barrier` function is responsible for generating the necessary assembly code to enforce the memory model for the given operation." GCC,nvptx,401,"The next statement of this code snippet is `return`. The `switch` statement is checking the value of `memmodel`, and based on that value, it is determining which branch to execute. In this case, the value of `memmodel` is not one of the cases, so the `default` branch is executed, which contains the statement `gcc_unreachable()`. However, the `gcc_unreachable()` function is a special function that is used to indicate that the code should not be reached. It is typically used in situations where the compiler can prove that a certain branch" GCC,nvptx,402,"This code snippet is part of the NVPTX target for GCC, and it appears to be generating assembly code for a call instruction. The code is checking if the result of the call is NULL, and if not, it is printing the return value register. It is also checking if the callee is a SYMBOL_REF, and if so, it is checking if the declaration of the callee is external and if it has argument types. If the callee is external and has argument types, it is recording the function declaration. If the callee is external and does not have argument types, it" GCC,nvptx,403,"This code snippet is part of the NVPTX backend for the GNU Compiler Collection (GCC). It is responsible for generating assembly code for the NVIDIA PTX target. The code snippet is a function that takes several arguments, including a register operand (callee), a pattern (pat), and a label number (labelno). It generates assembly code for a function call, including the function name, arguments, and return value. The function first checks if the callee is a symbol reference, and if so, it retrieves the corresponding declaration (decl) using the SYMBOL_" GCC,nvptx,404,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `if ( GET_MODE_SIZE ( dst_inner ) == GET_MODE_SIZE ( src_inner ) ) {` This is because the code is checking if the size of the destination and source modes are equal, and if so, it will execute the code inside the `if` statement." GCC,nvptx,405,"It looks like this code snippet is part of a function that is generating assembly code for a particular instruction. The `else` block is executed when the `if` condition is not met, which means that the `dst` register is not a red zone register. The `fprintf` function is used to write a string to the assembly output file. The first argument is the file to write to, the second argument is the format string, and the remaining arguments are the values to be substituted into the format string. In this case, the format string is `with_offset`, which is a string" GCC,nvptx,406,"The code snippet you provided is a C function that takes a `const char *` argument and returns a `const char *`. The function appears to be printing out some information to a file, using the `fprintf` function. The `with_offset` variable is a `const char *` that is initialized to a string literal. The `offset` variable is also a `const char *` that is initialized to a string literal. The function then checks if the `offset` variable is equal to a constant value `const0_rtx`. If it is, the function prints out a message" GCC,nvptx,407,"The next statement after the `if` block is the `return` statement. The `return` statement will return the value of `` to the caller of the function. The value of `` is not specified in the code snippet, so it is not possible to predict exactly what value will be returned. However, based on the context of the code, it is likely that `` is a string literal that represents a PTX instruction or a register name." GCC,nvptx,408,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be: `return nvptx_output_set_softstack_reg (src_regno);` This is because the `nvptx_output_set_softstack` function is setting the soft stack register, and the `nvptx_output_set_softstack_reg` function is responsible for setting the soft stack register. The `nvptx_output_set_softstack` function is checking if the current function has a soft stack and if it is not a leaf function, and if both conditions" GCC,nvptx,409,"The next statement after the given code snippet is likely to be the assembly code for the `nvptx_output_softstack_switch` function, which is responsible for generating the assembly code for the soft stack switch instruction. The `nvptx_output_softstack_switch` function takes five arguments: * `asm_out_file`: The output file where the assembly code will be written. * `true`: A boolean value indicating whether the soft stack switch instruction should be generated with the `true` condition. * `dest`: The destination register where the soft stack switch" GCC,nvptx,410,"The next statement after the given code snippet is: `return ;` This statement is a return statement that returns a string literal. The string literal is not specified in the code snippet, so it is not possible to determine what the exact string will be. However, based on the context of the code, it is likely that the string literal will be a string that represents the output of the `nvptx_output_unisimt_switch` and `nvptx_output_softstack_switch` functions." GCC,nvptx,411,"The next statement after the given code snippet is likely to be a call to the `nvptx_output_softstack_switch` function, which is a part of the GCC compiler's NVPTX backend. The function takes several arguments, including the output file, a boolean value indicating whether the soft stack switch is enabled, and two RTX values representing the source and destination of the switch. The `nvptx_output_softstack_switch` function is responsible for generating the assembly code for the soft stack switch, which is a mechanism for switching between different stacks in the" GCC,nvptx,412,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `output_init_frag(NULL_RTX);`" GCC,nvptx,413,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific inputs and conditions that are encountered during execution. However, based on the code snippet you provided, it appears that the next statement will be: fprintf ( file , , bits , reg_stack , regno , bits / ) ; This statement is part of the ""else"" block, which is executed when the ""entering"" variable is not true. It prints a string to the ""file"" output stream, using the ""bits""" GCC,nvptx,414,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `nvptx_pass_by_reference` function and the values of the `cumulative_args_t` and `function_arg_info` objects. However, based on the name of the function and the types of the arguments, it is likely that the next statement will be a check or calculation related to the passing of arguments by reference in the NVPTX target." GCC,nvptx,415,"The next statement of the code snippet is: pat = PATTERN ( insn ) ; This is because the `if` statement checks whether the `insn` is a jump instruction or not, and if it is not, it returns `NULL_RTX`. If the `insn` is a jump instruction, then the `pat` variable is assigned the result of the `PATTERN` function, which is the pattern of the instruction." GCC,nvptx,416,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return pat;` Explanation: The code snippet is checking the type of the `pat` expression using the `GET_CODE` macro. If the type is `PARALLEL`, it extracts the `NUM_LIT`th element of the vector and assigns it to `pat`. If the type is `SET` and the destination is `PC`, it returns `pat`. Otherwise, it returns `NULL_RTX`. Since the code snippet has already checked for the `PARALLEL` and `SET" GCC,nvptx,417,"The next statement in this code snippet is: return V2SImode; This is because the switch statement is checking the value of the variable ""mode"" and returning the corresponding vector mode. In this case, the value of ""mode"" is E_SImode, which corresponds to the vector mode V2SImode." GCC,nvptx,418,"The next statement after the `switch` block is `break ;`. The `switch` block is checking the value of `GET_CODE (x)` and executing different code based on the value. If `GET_CODE (x)` is `SYMBOL_REF` or `LABEL_REF`, it will call the function `output_addr_const (file, x)`. If `GET_CODE (x)` is not `MEM`, it will call the function `nvptx_print_operand (file, x, )`. The `break" GCC,nvptx,419,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet without knowing the values of the variables and the specific conditions that are being checked. However, based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the next statement will be one of the following: 1. `fputs ( section_for_sym ( x ) , file ) ;` 2. `fprintf ( file , , nvptx_ptx_type_from_mode ( mode , code == 't' ) ) ;` 3. `output_reg ( file , REGNO (" GCC,nvptx,420,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet without knowing the context in which it is being executed. The code appears to be part of a function that is printing out information about a machine instruction, but it is not clear what the function is doing or what the purpose of the code is. The code snippet appears to be using a switch statement to handle different cases based on the value of the ""code"" variable. The cases are handling different types of machine instructions, such as ""t"" for a ""t"" instruction, ""H"" for a ""H"" instruction, ""S"" for a ""S" GCC,nvptx,421,"The next statement after the given code snippet is likely to be a call to the `nvptx_print_address_operand` function, which is a part of the NVIDIA PTX (Parallel Thread Execution) instruction set architecture. The `nvptx_print_address_operand` function is used to print the address of an operand in the PTX instruction set. It takes three arguments: * `file`: a pointer to a file where the address should be printed * `addr`: the address of the operand to be printed * `mode" GCC,nvptx,422,"The next statement after the given code snippet is likely to be a call to the `nvptx_print_address_operand` function, which is a part of the NVIDIA PTX (Parallel Thread Execution) instruction set architecture. The `nvptx_print_address_operand` function is used to print the address of an operand in the PTX instruction set. It takes three arguments: * `file`: a pointer to a file where the address should be printed * `addr`: the address of the operand to be printed * `mode" GCC,nvptx,423,"The next statement of this code snippet is: return c == '.' || c == '#' || c == ' ' ;" GCC,nvptx,424,"The next statement of this code snippet is: return c == '.' || c == '#' || c == ' ' ;" GCC,nvptx,425,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific inputs and the behavior of the `nvptx_shared_propagate` function. However, based on the code snippet, it appears that the next statement will be: `if (empty_loop_p && !no_prop_p) {` This is because the `empty_loop_p` variable is set to `true` if the loop is empty and `no_prop_p` is set to `false` if the loop is not empty. The `" GCC,nvptx,426,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `machine_mode nvptx_promote_function_mode ( const_tree type , machine_mode mode , int * ARG_UNUSED ( punsignedp ) , const_tree funtype , int for_return )` This is a function declaration, which declares a function named `nvptx_promote_function_mode` that takes five arguments: * `type`: a `const_tree` object representing a type * `mode`: a `machine_mode` object representing a machine" GCC,nvptx,427,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return promote_arg ( mode , for_return || ! type || TYPE_ARG_TYPES ( funtype ) ) ;` This statement is a return statement that returns the result of the `promote_arg` function, which is called with the `mode` and `for_return` arguments. The `for_return` argument is a boolean value that indicates whether the function is being called for a return statement or not. The `! type` argument is a boolean value that indicates whether the function is being called for a" GCC,nvptx,428,"This code snippet is part of the GCC compiler and is related to the NVPTX target. It appears to be generating code for a loop that initializes a frame pointer. The next statement in the code snippet is: ``` emit_insn ( gen_rtx_SET ( tmp , frame_pointer_rtx ) ) ; ``` This statement sets the value of the temporary register `tmp` to the value of the frame pointer register `frame_pointer_rtx`. The frame pointer is a register that points to the current stack frame, and it is used to access local variables" GCC,nvptx,429,"Based on the code snippet you provided, it appears that the `mode` variable is being checked against a series of constants, and a different string literal is being returned depending on the value of `mode`. Without knowing the specific values of the constants or the string literals being returned, it's difficult to predict the exact output of the code. However, based on the structure of the code, it seems likely that the output will be a string literal that corresponds to one of the modes defined in the `mode` variable. If you provide more information about the constants and string literals being used, I" GCC,nvptx,430,"The next statement of this code snippet is: return ; This is because the code is using a switch statement to determine which string literal to return based on the value of the `mode` parameter. The first case in the switch statement is for the `E_DImode` mode, and it returns the string literal ``. Since the `mode` parameter is not `E_DImode`, the next case in the switch statement is evaluated, which is for the `E_HFmode` mode. Since the `mode` parameter is not" GCC,nvptx,431,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `declared_fndecls_htab->insert(decl, slot);`" GCC,nvptx,432,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the implementation of the `get_fnname_from_decl` function and the value of the `decl` variable. However, based on the name of the function and the type of the variable, it is likely that the next statement will be a call to a function that takes a string as an argument, such as `printf` or `puts`." GCC,nvptx,433,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be: `declared_libfuncs_htab->find_slot(callee, INSERT);` This is because the code is checking if the slot for the `callee` function is already present in the hash table, and if not, it inserts the `callee` function into the hash table. The `INSERT` parameter is used to indicate that the function should be inserted into the hash table if it is not already present." GCC,nvptx,434,"The next statement is likely to be: *slot = decl; The code is using a hash table to store the function declarations, and the `needed_fndecls_htab` variable is a pointer to the hash table. The `find_slot` function is used to find the slot in the hash table where the function declaration should be stored. The `INSERT` parameter is used to indicate that the function declaration should be inserted into the hash table if it is not already present. The `*slot` variable is a pointer to the slot in the hash table where" GCC,nvptx,435,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `tree * slot = needed_fndecls_htab->find_slot(decl, INSERT);` This line of code is searching for the slot in the `needed_fndecls_htab` hash table that corresponds to the `decl` tree. The `find_slot` function is used to search for the slot, and it takes two arguments: the `decl` tree and the `INSERT` flag. The `INSERT` flag indicates that the slot should be inserted into the hash table if it is not already present" GCC,nvptx,436,"This code snippet appears to be part of a function that is generating assembly code for a declaration. The function is using the `oacc_get_fn_attrib` function to get the attributes of the declaration, and then it is printing the assembly code for the declaration. The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be the `fprintf` statement that prints the assembly code for the declaration. The `fprintf` statement takes three arguments: the file to print to, the format string, and the arguments to be formatted. In this case, the file to print to is `asm_out_file" GCC,nvptx,437,"The next statement in the code snippet is `fprintf(asm_out_file, , size)`." GCC,nvptx,438,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return nvptx_lockless_update ( loc , gsi , ptr , var , op ) ;` This statement is executed if the size of the type of the variable `var` is equal to the size of the `unsigned_type_node` or `long_long_unsigned_type_node`." GCC,nvptx,439,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it appears to be part of a larger function and the context is not provided. However, based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the next statement may be a call to the `nvptx_reorg_subreg` function." GCC,nvptx,440,"The next statement in this code snippet is: `nvptx_reorg_subreg ( ) ;` This statement calls the `nvptx_reorg_subreg` function, which is not defined in the code snippet provided. It is likely that this function is defined elsewhere in the program or in a library that is being used." GCC,nvptx,441,"Based on the code snippet you provided, it appears to be a function that is part of the GCC compiler. The function is responsible for reorganizing the registers used in the code. The code snippet you provided is incomplete, so it's difficult to predict the next statement with certainty. However, based on the context and the variables used in the code, it appears that the next statement will be related to the reorganization of the registers. It's possible that the next statement will be a loop that iterates over the instructions in the code and performs the reorganization for each instruction." GCC,nvptx,442,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `pred = NULL_RTX;` This statement sets the `pred` variable to `NULL_RTX`, which is a special value used to indicate that there is no predicate for the instruction. The `predicate_insn` function is then called with `post` as the instruction and `pred` as the predicate, which sets the predicate for the instruction." GCC,nvptx,443,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `p[i] = '$';` This statement is inside the `if` block, which means that it will only be executed if the condition `p[i] == '.'` is true. The statement assigns the value `$` to the character at position `i` in the string `p`." GCC,nvptx,444,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return false;` The function `nvptx_return_in_memory` is defined to always return `false`, regardless of the input parameters." GCC,nvptx,445,"The next statement after the `if` statement will be the `return default_scalar_mode_supported_p ( mode ) ;` statement. The `if` statement checks if the `nvptx_experimental` flag is set, the `mode` is `HFmode`, and the target GPU is SM53 or later. If all of these conditions are true, the function returns `true`. Otherwise, the function returns the result of the `default_scalar_mode_supported_p` function called with the `mode` argument." GCC,nvptx,446,"The next statement in the code snippet is: `edge e;` This line declares a variable `e` of type `edge`, which is a structure that represents an edge in the control flow graph. The variable `e` is used to iterate over the edges in the `block->succs` list, which is a list of edges that represent the successors of the current block." GCC,nvptx,447,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific values of the variables and the implementation of the `quick_push` and `vec` functions. However, based on the code snippet, it appears that the next statement will be: `edges = dir > ? b->succs : b->preds;` This statement assigns the value of `edges` to be either `b->succs` or `b->preds`, depending on the value of `dir` and `high = hi_back < hi_child ? node_back : node_child;` This statement is assigning the `high` field of the `sese` object to either `node_back` or `node_child`, depending on the value of `hi_back` and `hi_child`. If `hi_back` is less than `hi_child`, then `node_back` is assigned to `sese->high`, otherwise `node_child` is assigned to `sese->high`." GCC,nvptx,450,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific context and the implementation of the code. However, based on the information provided, it is likely that the next statement will be related to the `vector_red_partition` variable, which is being assigned a value of ``. One possible next statement could be: ``` vector_red_partition = ; ``` This statement would assign the value `` to the `vector_red_partition` variable, which is likely" GCC,nvptx,451,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `emit_insn_after(init, insn);` This statement emits the `init` instruction after the `insn` instruction. The `init` instruction is a `SET` instruction that sets the `data.base` register to the value of `bcast_sym`. The `emit_insn_after` function is used to emit the `init` instruction after the `insn` instruction, which is the current instruction being executed." GCC,nvptx,452,"The next statement of the code snippet is: `rtx init = gen_rtx_SET (data.base, bcast_sym);` This statement is initializing a new `rtx` object called `init` and setting its value to the result of the `gen_rtx_SET` function, which takes two arguments: `data.base` and `bcast_sym`. The `gen_rtx_SET` function is used to generate a new `rtx` object that represents a memory access operation, where the memory location is specified by `data.base` and" GCC,nvptx,453,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return PTX_WARP_SIZE;` This statement returns the value of the `PTX_WARP_SIZE` constant, which is a predefined constant in the NVIDIA CUDA programming model that represents the size of a warp in threads. The `nvptx_simt_vf` function is a device function that returns the size of a warp in threads, and it is used to implement the `warpSize` intrinsic function in the NVIDIA CUDA programming model." GCC,nvptx,454,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return PTX_WARP_SIZE;` This statement returns the value of the `PTX_WARP_SIZE` constant, which is a predefined constant in the NVIDIA CUDA programming model that represents the size of a warp in threads. The `nvptx_simt_vf` function is a device function that returns the size of a warp in threads, and it is used to implement the `warpSize` intrinsic function in the NVIDIA CUDA programming model." GCC,nvptx,455,"It's difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet without knowing the specific values of the variables and the context in which the code is being executed. However, based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the next statement will be the `if` statement that checks whether `mode` is equal to `GOMP_DIM_VECTOR` or `GOMP_DIM_WORKER`. If this condition is true, the code will execute the `emit_insn_after` function with the `gen_exit` function as an argument. If this condition is false, the code will" GCC,nvptx,456,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific inputs and the behavior of the `gcc_assert` and `nvptx_single` functions. However, based on the code snippet provided, it is likely that the next statement will be a call to the `nvptx_single` function with the `mask`, `par->forked_block`, and `pre_tail` parameters." GCC,nvptx,457,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `tail = par->join_block;` This statement assigns the value of `par->join_block` to the variable `tail`." GCC,nvptx,458,"The code snippet you provided is incomplete, so I can't predict the next statement with certainty. However, based on the context, it appears that the code is working with a worklist data structure and is trying to split a basic block. The next statement is likely to be a call to the `split_block` function, which takes a basic block and a previous instruction as arguments, and returns a new edge. The edge is then assigned to the `e` variable. Here's the code snippet with the next statement added: ``` unsigned ix; insn_bb_" GCC,nvptx,459,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `worklist.safe_push(insn_bb_t(insn, block));` This is because the `seen_insn` variable is set to `true` when the `switch` statement encounters a `CODE_FOR_nvptx_forked` or `CODE_FOR_nvptx_join` case, and the `worklist.safe_push()` function is called when `seen_insn` is `true`." GCC,nvptx,460,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be the evaluation of the `stdarg_p` function with the `cum->fntype` argument. The `stdarg_p` function is used to determine if a function has a variable number of arguments. It takes a function type as an argument and returns a boolean value indicating whether the function has a variable number of arguments. Therefore, the next statement of this code snippet is likely to be the evaluation of the `stdarg_p` function with the `cum->fntype` argument, which is a function type." GCC,nvptx,461,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return false;` This is because the function `nvptx_truly_noop_truncation` is defined to always return `false`, regardless of the input arguments. The function is named `truly_noop_truncation`, which suggests that it is a no-op (i.e., it does nothing) and always returns `false`." GCC,nvptx,462,"The next statement of this code snippet is: return true;" GCC,nvptx,463,"The next statement after the code snippet you provided is: `return true;` This is because the `emit_insn_after` function is called with the `insn` parameter, which is the instruction that should be emitted after the `nvptx_gen_shuffle` instruction. The `return true;` statement is executed after the `emit_insn_after` function is called, and it returns a boolean value indicating whether the instruction was successfully emitted." GCC,nvptx,464,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `emit_insn_after (nvptx_gen_shuffle (reg, reg, master, SHUFFLE_IDX), insn);` This statement is emitting an instruction after the current instruction (`insn`) using the `emit_insn_after` function. The instruction being emitted is `nvptx_gen_shuffle`, which is a function that generates a shuffle instruction for the NVIDIA PTX target. The function takes four arguments: `reg`, `reg`, `master`, and" GCC,nvptx,465,"The next statement in the code snippet is: return false;" GCC,nvptx,466,"The next statement of this code snippet is: return false; Explanation: The function `nvptx_use_anchors_for_symbol_p` is defined as a static function, which means it is only visible within the current translation unit (i.e., the current source file). The function takes a single argument, `a`, which is a `const_rtx` (i.e., a constant expression of type `rtx`). The function body consists of a single statement, which is a `return` statement that returns the value `false`." GCC,nvptx,467,The next statement after the `else` clause will be the assignment statement `align = BIGGEST_ALIGNMENT`. GCC,nvptx,468,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `align = MAX ( align , GET_MODE_ALIGNMENT ( TYPE_MODE ( type ) ) ) ;` This statement sets the `align` variable to the maximum of its current value and the alignment of the type mode of the `type` variable." GCC,nvptx,469,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return nvptx_propagate ( is_call , block , insn , PM_read_write , warp_prop_gen , , false ) ;` This statement is a function call to `nvptx_propagate`, which is a function that propagates the properties of a memory access instruction through the program. The function takes several arguments: * `is_call`: a boolean value indicating whether the instruction is a call instruction. * `block`: the basic block in" GCC,nvptx,470,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return nvptx_propagate ( is_call , block , insn , PM_read_write , warp_prop_gen , , false ) ;` This statement is a function call to `nvptx_propagate`, which is a function that propagates the properties of a memory access instruction through the program. The function takes several arguments: * `is_call`: a boolean value indicating whether the instruction is a call instruction. * `block`: the basic block in" GCC,nvptx,471,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be a comparison of the `l` parameter with a constant value, which is represented by the placeholder ``. The comparison is likely to be a less-than or greater-than comparison, as the `gcc_assert` macro is used to check for a condition that must be true. Therefore, the next statement of this code snippet is likely to be: ``` if (l < ) ``` or ``` if (l > ) ``` depending on the" GCC,nvptx,472,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be a comparison of the `l` parameter with a constant value, which is represented by the placeholder ``. The comparison is likely to be a less-than or greater-than comparison, as the `gcc_assert` macro is used to check for a condition that must be true. Therefore, the next statement of this code snippet is likely to be: ``` if (l < ) ``` or ``` if (l > ) ``` depending on the" GCC,nvptx,473,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `if ( ! function ) fprintf ( asm_out_file , ) ;` This statement is executed if the `function` variable is false, which means that the symbol `sym` is not a function declaration. The `` placeholder is used to represent a string literal, which is not specified in the code snippet. The `fprintf` function is used to print the string literal to the assembly file." GCC,nvptx,474,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific values of the variables and the behavior of the functions called. However, based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the next statement will be: fprintf(asm_out_file, ) This is because the code checks if the symbol is a function declaration (using the SYMBOL_REF_DECL macro) and if it is not, it prints a string literal to the assembly file using fprintf." GCC,nvptx,475,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `output_reg(file, regno, inner_mode, GET_MODE_SIZE(inner_mode));` This statement is inside the `else` block, which means that the condition `subreg_offset == - ` is not true. Therefore, the code will execute the `else` block, which contains the statement `output_reg(file, regno, inner_mode, GET_MODE_SIZE(inner_mode));`." GCC,nvptx,476,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `parent -> inner = this ;` This is because the `if` statement checks if `parent` is not `NULL`, and if it is not, it assigns `this` to `parent->inner`." GCC,nvptx,477,"The next statement after the given code snippet is: `return true;` This is because the code checks if the mode is not an integer or float, and if it is not, it returns true." GCC,nvptx,478,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `tree t = TREE_VALUE ( dims ) ;` This statement assigns the value of the `TREE_VALUE` field of the `dims` variable to the `t` variable." GCC,nvptx,479,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `if (GET_CODE(PATTERN(insn)) == ASM_INPUT || GET_CODE(PATTERN(insn)) == ASM_OPERANDS || (GET_CODE(PATTERN(insn)) == PARALLEL && asm_noperands(PATTERN(insn)) >= )))` This is a continuation of the previous `if` statement, which checks if the `PATTERN` of the `ins" GCC,nvptx,480,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return mode;` This statement is executed if the `if` condition is not satisfied, which means that `prototyped` is true or `mode` is not equal to `SFmode`. In this case, the function returns the value of `mode` without modifying it." GCC,nvptx,481,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return mode;`" GCC,nvptx,482,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the `promote_return` function is dependent on the input `mode` and the specific implementation of the function. However, based on the name of the function and the fact that it is declared as `static`, it is likely that the function is used to promote the return type of a function to a more general or abstract type. Without more context or information about the specific implementation of the `promote_return` function, it is not possible to provide a more specific prediction of the next statement" GCC,nvptx,483,"The next statement after the given code snippet would be the return statement of the `promote_return` function, which is: ``` return promote_arg ( mode , true ) ; ``` This statement returns the result of the `promote_arg` function, which is called with the `mode` argument and the `true` argument. The `promote_arg` function is not defined in the given code snippet, so it is not possible to determine what it does or what its return value would be." GCC,nvptx,484,"Based on the code snippet you provided, it appears that the `switch` statement is checking the value of `v` and returning a different value depending on the value of `major_p`. The next statement after the `switch` statement would be the code that is executed after the `switch` statement. However, without knowing the value of `v` and `major_p`, it is not possible to predict exactly what the next statement will be. Here are some possible next statements based on the code snippet you provided: * If `v` is equal to `PTX_VERSION_3" GCC,nvptx,485,The next statement after the `case PTX_VERSION_7_0` label is `return `. GCC,nvptx,486,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `brackets.safe_push(bracket(back));`" GCC,nvptx,487,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `while (removed--) brackets.pop();`" GCC,nvptx,488,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `brackets[ix].back = pseudo;`" GCC,nvptx,489,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet without knowing the context and the implementation of the `section_for_sym` function. However, based on the syntax and the fact that the function is called with an argument that is a section number, it is likely that the next statement will be a call to a function that performs some operation on the section, such as reading or writing data to it." GCC,nvptx,490,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the code depends on the input data and the specific implementation of the `auto_vec` class. However, based on the name of the function and the parameter it takes, it is likely that the function is intended to set the color of an object based on the color counts in the `color_counts` vector. The function may use the color counts to determine the most common color in the vector, and then set the color of the object to that color. Without more information about the specific implementation" GCC,nvptx,491,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `data->ptr = NULL_RTX;`" GCC,nvptx,492,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return # XX ;` This statement is executed when the `PTX_ISA_SM` macro is defined with a value of `XX`. The `#` symbol is used to concatenate the value of `XX` with the string `""PTX_ISA_SM""`, resulting in the string `""PTX_ISA_SMXX""`. This string is then returned as the value of the `PTX_ISA_SM` macro. The `default` case is not reachable because the `PTX_ISA" GCC,nvptx,493,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the function `sm_version_to_string` is dependent on the value of the `sm` parameter, which is not provided in the code snippet. However, based on the name of the function and the parameter type, it is likely that the function returns a string representation of the `sm` parameter, which is an enumeration of the PTX ISA. The function may use a `switch` statement or a lookup table to map the `sm` value to a string representation." GCC,nvptx,494,"The next statement after the code snippet you provided is likely to be a conditional statement that checks the return value of the `maybe_split_mode` function. Here's a possible next statement: ``` if (maybe_split_mode(mode) != VOIDmode) { // do something } ``` This statement checks if the return value of `maybe_split_mode` is not equal to `VOIDmode`. If it is not equal, then the code inside the `if` block will be executed. Note that the exact next statement will depend on the" GCC,nvptx,495,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet without knowing the context in which it is being executed. However, based on the code snippet provided, it appears to be part of a loop that is iterating over a set of instructions in a basic block. The loop starts by checking if the current instruction is a vector instruction, and if so, it sets the `vector_neutered` flag to `true`. If the current instruction is not a vector instruction, the loop checks if it is a jump instruction, and if so, it sets the `seen_vector_jump` flag to `" GCC,nvptx,496,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `if ( seen_vector_label || seen_worker_label ) {` This statement checks whether the `seen_vector_label` or `seen_worker_label` variables are true, and if so, it executes the code inside the if statement." GCC,nvptx,497,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `gcc_assert ( ! seen_vector_label ) ;`" GCC,nvptx,498,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet without knowing the specific inputs and context in which it is being executed. However, based on the code snippet provided, it appears to be a part of a function that is checking the labels of instructions in a basic block (BB) and asserting that certain conditions are met. The code snippet starts by initializing two variables, `seen_worker_label` and `seen_vector_label`, to `false`. It then enters a loop that iterates over the instructions in the BB, checking the labels of each instruction. If the instruction is a vector" GCC,nvptx,499,"The next statement of this code snippet is: return reg;" GCC,nvptx,500,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be the initialization of the `reg` variable, which is a `rtx` type. The `reg` variable is being passed as an argument to the `warp_prop_gen` function, and it is likely to be used as a register in the function. Here is the predicted next statement of the code snippet: ``` reg = rtx_alloc (pm->mode); ``` This statement allocates a new `rtx` object with the same mode as the `pm` object, and assigns it to the `reg`" GCC,nvptx,501,"The next statement after the `if ( ! seen_barsync ) continue;` statement is the `emit_insn_before ( gen_nvptx_membar_cta ( ) , insn ) ;` statement. The `! seen_barsync` condition is evaluated to `true` if `seen_barsync` is `false`, which means that the `emit_insn_before` statement will be executed. The `emit_insn_before` statement emits an instruction before the current instruction, which in this case is the `gen_nvptx" GCC,nvptx,502,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `if (INSN_P(insn)) switch (recog_memoized(insn)) { ... }` This statement checks if the current instruction is an INSN (i.e., a normal instruction) and if so, it switches on the result of the `recog_memoized` function, which returns the recognized code for the instruction. The `switch` statement then checks the recognized code and performs the appropriate action based on the code." GCC,nvptx,503,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific values of the constants and the behavior of the `workaround_uninit_method_2` and `workaround_uninit_method_3` functions. However, based on the syntax and structure of the code, it appears that the next statement will be a `break` statement, which will cause the program to exit the `switch` statement and continue executing the code following the `switch` statement." GCC,nvptx,504,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `workaround_uninit_method_2` and `workaround_uninit_method_3` functions, as well as the value of the `` constant. However, based on the code snippet provided, it is likely that the next statement will be the `workaround_uninit_method_3` function call, as it is the default case in the switch statement. The `workaround_uninit_method_2` function call is only" GCC,nvptx,505,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `insert_here = emit_insn_before ( inits , first ) ;` This statement inserts the instructions in `inits` before the instruction `first`. The `emit_insn_before` function is used to insert the instructions in the correct order, with the first instruction in `inits` being inserted before `first`. The `insert_here` variable is then set to the instruction that was inserted, which is the first instruction in `inits`." GCC,nvptx,506,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `insert_here = emit_insn_after(inits, insert_here);` This statement is executed if `first` is NULL, which means that there is no instruction to insert before. In this case, the function `emit_insn_after` is called to insert the instructions `inits` after the instruction `insert_here`." GCC,nvptx,507,"The next statement is likely to be a call to `start_sequence()` to start a new sequence of instructions. The purpose of this function is to create a new sequence of instructions that can be inserted into the current sequence of instructions. The new sequence will be created by calling `start_sequence()` and then adding instructions to it using the `emit_insn()` function. Once the new sequence is complete, it can be inserted into the current sequence using the `end_sequence()` function." GCC,nvptx,508,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be: `FOR_EACH_BB_FN (bb, cfun) {` This is because the code snippet ends with a call to `end_sequence()`, which is a function that is typically used to mark the end of a sequence of instructions in the GCC compiler. The `FOR_EACH_BB_FN` macro is then used to iterate over the basic blocks in the current function, and the code inside the loop will be executed for each basic block." GCC,nvptx,509,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be the execution of the `emit_move_insn` function, which is used to generate a move instruction in the RTL (Register Transfer Language) representation of the program. The `emit_move_insn` function takes two arguments: the first is the destination register, and the second is the source register. In this case, the destination register is `reg`, which is a register with the same mode as the register with index `ix` in the `regno_reg_rtx` array. The source register is `CONST0_RTX" GCC,nvptx,510,"The next statement after the `if` statement is the `else` statement, which is executed if the condition `pass_in_memory ( mode , type , false )` is not true. Within the `else` statement, there is a declaration of a variable `split` and an assignment to it. The value of `split` is determined by the result of the expression `TREE_CODE ( type ) == COMPLEX_TYPE`. If this expression is true, then `split` is assigned the value `true`, otherwise it is assigned the value `false`. After the assignment" GCC,nvptx,511,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return (lookup_attribute(, attrs) != NULL_TREE || (lookup_attribute(, attrs) != NULL_TREE && lookup_attribute(, attrs) != NULL_TREE));` This statement is a return statement that returns a boolean value indicating whether the `write_as_kernel` function should be called. The return value is determined by the result of the `lookup_attribute` function, which checks if the `attrs` parameter" GCC,nvptx,512,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return (lookup_attribute(, attrs) != NULL_TREE || (lookup_attribute(, attrs) != NULL_TREE && lookup_attribute(, attrs) != NULL_TREE));` This statement is a return statement that returns a boolean value indicating whether the `write_as_kernel` function should be called. The return value is determined by the result of the `lookup_attribute` function, which checks if the `attrs` parameter" GCC,nvptx,513,"The next statement of this code snippet is: s << name << ;" GCC,nvptx,514,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `name++;`" GCC,nvptx,515,"The next statement after the code snippet you provided is: `return name;`" GCC,nvptx,516,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be: `s << name;` This is because the previous statement is `break;`, which exits the `switch` statement, and the next statement after the `switch` statement is `s << name;`." GCC,nvptx,517,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `s << name;` Explanation: The code snippet is part of a function that is writing a string to a stream. The `s` variable is a stream, and the `name` variable is a string. The code is checking if the `name` variable has been replaced with a new string, and if so, it writes the new string to the stream. If the `name` variable has not been replaced, it writes the original string to the stream. The next statement of the code snippet is `s << name;`," GCC,nvptx,518,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `write_fn_marker(s, false, true, name);` This statement writes a function marker to the output stream `s`, using the current value of `name` as the function name. The `false` and `true` arguments are used to specify the type of function marker to write." GCC,nvptx,519,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the values of the variables and the behavior of the functions being called. However, based on the code snippet, it appears that the next statement will be: s << pfx << ptx_type << << reg_names [ NVPTX_RETURN_REGNUM ] << sfx; This statement is appending a string to the string stream ""s"" using the ""<<"" operator. The string being appended is a combination of the ""pfx""" GCC,nvptx,520,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the `nvptx_ptx_type_from_mode` function is not known. However, based on the name of the function and the arguments passed to it, it appears to be a function that returns a string representing the PTX type for a given mode. The next statement of the code snippet is likely to be a call to the `strcat` function, which concatenates two strings. The `strcat` function takes two arguments: the first is the destination string, and the second" GCC,nvptx,521,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `if ( for_proto ) return return_in_mem ;`" GCC,nvptx,522,"The next statement of this code snippet is: fprintf(file, , align, name, size); This is because the previous statement, write_var_marker(file, true, false, name), does not have a semicolon at the end, so the next statement is assumed to be part of the same expression. The placeholder is a string literal that will be replaced with a string value at runtime. The align and size parameters are also placeholders that will be replaced with values at runtime." GCC,nvptx,523,"The next statement of this code snippet is: fprintf(file, , align, name, size); This is because the previous statement, write_var_marker(file, true, false, name), does not have a semicolon at the end, so the next statement is assumed to be part of the same expression. The placeholder is a string literal that will be replaced with a string value at runtime. The align and size parameters are also placeholders that will be replaced with values at runtime." GCC,nvptx,524,"The next statement in the code snippet is: `assemble_name_raw ( file , name ) ;` This statement is calling the `assemble_name_raw` function, which is not defined in the code snippet provided. It is likely that this function is defined elsewhere in the code and is used to assemble the name of a variable or function. The `file` variable is passed as an argument to the function, along with the `name` variable." GCC,nvptx,525,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the code is dependent on the specific implementation of the `bb_sese` class and the input data. However, based on the name of the class and the destructor syntax, it is likely that the code is attempting to destroy an instance of the `bb_sese` class. The destructor is typically used to release any resources that the object is using, such as memory or file handles. Without more information about the specific implementation of the `bb_sese` class, it is" GCC,nvptx,526,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the code is dependent on the specific implementation of the `bb_sese` class and the input data. However, based on the name of the class and the destructor syntax, it is likely that the code is attempting to destroy an instance of the `bb_sese` class. The destructor is typically used to release any resources that the object is using, such as memory or file handles. Without more information about the specific implementation of the `bb_sese` class, it is" Compiler Type,Target,Idx,Des GCC,riscv,0,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return ;` This is because the `if` statement checks if the type is valid, and if it is not, it returns the string literal ``. If the type is valid, the function will continue to execute the next statement, which is not shown in the code snippet." GCC,riscv,1,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty because it is not a complete code snippet and the context is not provided. However, based on the code snippet provided, it appears to be a part of a function that is performing some bitwise operations on the `mode` variable. The `else` branch of the code snippet sets the `mlen` variable to a value that is calculated based on the `sew` variable and the `lmul_log2` variable. The `mode` variable is then shifted left by the value of `mlen`, and the result" GCC,riscv,2,"The next statement of this code snippet is: mode << << mlen << ; This statement is a concatenation of three strings: , mlen, and another . The resulting string will be stored in the stringstream object ""mode""." GCC,riscv,3,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return floattype(eew, elmul_log2);` This is because the `else` clause of the `if` statement is executed when `float_p` is true, and the `return` statement inside the `else` clause is executed." GCC,riscv,4,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `elmul_log2 = lmul_log2 + std::log2(eew/sew);` This is because the `else` clause is executed when `sew < eew`, and the expression `eew/sew` is evaluated to be a positive value. The `std::log2` function is then called with this positive value as its argument, and the result is added to `lmul_log2` to produce the final value of `elmul_log2`." GCC,riscv,5,"The next statement of the code snippet is: `lmul_log2 = - lmul_log2;`" GCC,riscv,6,"The next statement of this code snippet is: case : return lmul_log2 >= - && ! float_p ; This is the third case statement in the switch block, and it is checking if the value of `lmul_log2` is greater than or equal to `- ` and if `float_p` is false. If both conditions are true, the statement returns `true`, otherwise it returns `false`." GCC,riscv,7,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `tree new_flags = create_tmp_var_raw ( RISCV_ATYPE_USI ) ;`" GCC,riscv,8,"The next statement in this code snippet is: `return riscv_builtin_decls[subcode];` This statement is inside the `RISCV_BUILTIN_VECTOR` case, which means that the `subcode` variable is a vector builtin. The `riscv_builtin_decls` array is an array of `tree` nodes, and the `subcode` variable is used as an index into this array to retrieve the corresponding `tree` node. The `return` statement returns this `tree` node as the result of the function." GCC,riscv,9,"The next statement of this code snippet is: case RISCV_BUILTIN_GENERAL : { const struct riscv_builtin_description * d = & riscv_builtins [ subcode ] ; switch ( d -> builtin_type ) { case RISCV_BUILTIN_DIRECT : return riscv_expand_builtin_direct ( d -> icode , target , exp , true ) ;" GCC,riscv,10,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific values of the variables and the behavior of the `ARRAY_SIZE` function. However, based on the information provided, it is likely that the next statement will be: `riscv_builtins[i] = ;` This is because the loop is iterating over the elements of the `riscv_builtins` array, and the loop variable `i` is being used to index into the array. The loop will continue until `i` is greater than" GCC,riscv,11,"This code snippet is defining a set of built-in functions for the RISC-V instruction set architecture. It is using a loop to iterate over an array of built-in function descriptions, and for each description, it is creating a function type and adding the function to a list of built-in functions. The next statement in the code snippet is: `tree type = riscv_build_function_type ( d -> prototype );` This line is creating a new `tree` object, which is a data structure used to represent the type of a function in the RISC" GCC,riscv,12,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `riscv_float16_type_node->type = REAL_TYPE;`" GCC,riscv,13,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `gcc_assert ( opno + call_expr_nargs ( exp ) == insn_data [ icode ] . n_generator_args ) ;`" GCC,riscv,14,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `case RISCV_BUILTIN_MD:`" GCC,riscv,15,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be: `tree arg = TREE_OPERAND ( CALL_EXPR_ARG ( exp , 0 ) , ) ;` This statement is accessing the first argument of the `CALL_EXPR` node `exp`, which is a `TREE_OPERAND` node, and extracting the `NUM_LIT` field from it. The `NUM_LIT` field is a `tree` node that represents a literal value in the RISC-V instruction set." GCC,riscv,16,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `case RISCV_BUILTIN_DIRECT_NO_TARGET: return riscv_expand_builtin_direct ( d -> icode , target , exp , false ) ;` This is because the `switch` statement is checking the value of `d->builtin_type`, and if it matches `RISCV_BUILTIN_DIRECT_NO_TARGET`, it will execute the code inside the `case` statement." GCC,riscv,17,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `tree type = riscv_build_function_type ( d->prototype );` This statement is part of the `riscv_init_builtins` function, which initializes the built-in functions for the RISC-V architecture. The `riscv_build_function_type` function is called to create a function type for the built-in function, based on the prototype of the function. The `type` variable is then used to create a function declaration for the built-in function." GCC,riscv,18,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `tree type = riscv_build_function_type ( d -> prototype ) ;` This statement is calling the `riscv_build_function_type` function and passing it the `prototype` field of the `d` struct. The `riscv_build_function_type` function is defined earlier in the code snippet and is used to build a function type for a built-in function. The `prototype` field is a member of the `riscv_builtin_description` struct and is used to specify the type of the built" GCC,riscv,19,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `build_call_expr` function and the values of the `frflags` and `fsflags` variables. However, based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the next statement is likely to be a call to the `build_call_expr` function with the `fsflags` variable as the first argument and the `old_flags` variable as the second argument. This call is likely to be used to construct a call expression that sets the `fsflags` register to" GCC,riscv,20,"The next statement after the code snippet you provided is: * update = build_call_expr ( frflags, , old_flags ); Explanation: The code snippet you provided is part of a function that is generating RISC-V assembly code for a target machine. The function is using the GCC built-in functions for generating code for the RISC-V floating-point instructions. The code snippet you provided is creating a temporary variable ""old_flags"" to hold the current value of the floating-point status flags. It is then" GCC,riscv,21,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `types[(int)type] = build_function_type_list(RISCV_FTYPE_ATYPES##NUM_ARGS, NULL_TREE);`" GCC,riscv,22,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `types[(int)type] = build_function_type_list(RISCV_FTYPE_ATYPES##NUM_ARGS, NULL_TREE);` Explanation: The code snippet is checking if the `types` array at index `type` is `NULL_TREE`. If it is, it switches on the value of `type` and sets the `types` array at index `type` to a new function type list. The `build_function_type_list` function is used to" GCC,riscv,23,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return riscv_expand_builtin_direct ( d -> icode , target , exp , true ) ;` This is because the `switch` statement is checking the value of `d -> builtin_type`, which is a member of the `riscv_builtin_description` struct, and it is currently set to `RISCV_BUILTIN_DIRECT`. Therefore, the code will execute the statement associated with the `RISCV_BUILTIN_DIRECT` case, which is the `return`" GCC,riscv,24,"The next statement after the `for` loop in the code snippet is: `riscv_prepare_builtin_arg(&ops[opno++], exp, argno);` This statement prepares the next argument for the built-in function by calling the `riscv_prepare_builtin_arg` function with the appropriate arguments. The `opno` variable is incremented by 1 to point to the next operation in the `ops` array, and the `argno` variable is incremented by 1 to point to the next argument in the `exp` expression." GCC,riscv,25,"The next statement after the `return` statement is the `}` character, which marks the end of the function body." GCC,riscv,26,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `riscv_builtin_decls[i] = add_builtin_function(d->name, type, i, BUILT_IN_MD, NULL, NULL);` This statement adds a built-in function to the `riscv_builtin_decls` array, using the `add_builtin_function` function. The function takes several arguments: * `d->name`: The name of the built-in function. * `type`: The type of the built-in function. * `" GCC,riscv,27,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `riscv_builtin_decl_index[d->icode] = i;` This statement assigns the value of `i` to the `riscv_builtin_decl_index` array at the index `d->icode`. The `d->icode` field is a pointer to the `icode` field of the `d` structure, which is a pointer to the `icode` field of the `riscv_builtin_decl` structure. Therefore, this statement is assigning the value of `i` to the `" GCC,riscv,28,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `case RISCV_BUILTIN_VECTOR : return ( loc , arg_loc , subcode , orig_fndecl , nargs , args ) ;` This is because the `switch` statement is checking the value of `code & RISCV_BUILTIN_CLASS`, and if it matches `RISCV_BUILTIN_VECTOR`, it will execute the code inside the `case` block. The `` is a placeholder" GCC,riscv,29,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `builtin_define_with_int_value ( , ) ;` This statement defines a built-in macro with the name specified by `` and the value specified by ``. The macro is defined with the `builtin_define_with_int_value` function, which is a part of the GCC compiler." GCC,riscv,30,"The next statement of this code snippet is: return ( major * ) + ( minor * ) ; This statement is a return statement that returns the result of the expression (major * ) + (minor * ). The expression is evaluated and the result is returned." GCC,riscv,31,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific inputs and the behavior of the functions called. However, based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the next statement will be a call to the `error` function, as the code checks the value of `TARGET_VECTOR` and calls `error` if it is not set. Here is a possible next statement: ``` error ( ""TARGET_VECTOR is not set"" ) ; ``` It is important to note that this is just one possible next" GCC,riscv,32,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be a function call to `riscv_check_builtin_call`, as it is being assigned to the `targetm.check_builtin_call` field. The `riscv_check_builtin_call` function is likely to be a function that checks if a built-in function call is valid for the RISC-V architecture. The `c_register_pragma` function is being called with three arguments: the first is a string literal, the second is another string literal, and the third is a function pointer to `ris" GCC,riscv,33,"The next statement in the code snippet is: builtin_define ( ) ; This is because the code is inside a switch statement, and the switch statement is currently evaluating the expression `riscv_abi`. The `case` labels are being evaluated in order, and the first one that matches the value of `riscv_abi` will cause the corresponding statement to be executed. In this case, the first `case` label that matches the value of `riscv_abi` is `case ABI_ILP32`, so the statement `builtin_" GCC,riscv,34,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `builtin_define_with_int_value ( , ) ;` This statement defines a built-in macro with the name specified by `` and the value specified by ``. The macro is defined with the `builtin_define_with_int_value` function, which is a part of the GCC compiler's built-in functions." GCC,riscv,35,The next statement in the code snippet is `default :`. GCC,riscv,36,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the `riscv_d_register_target_info` function is not specified. However, based on the name of the function, it is likely that it is related to the RISC-V instruction set architecture and is intended to register target information for the RISC-V architecture. Without more information about the specific implementation of the `riscv_d_register_target_info` function, it is not possible to provide a more specific prediction of the next statement." GCC,riscv,37,"The next statement after the `else` block in this code snippet is the `d_add_builtin_version` function call. The function takes a string literal as its argument, which is not specified in this code snippet. Therefore, the next statement is: `d_add_builtin_version();`" GCC,riscv,38,"The next statement of this code snippet is: d_add_builtin_version(); This is because the if-else statement in the code snippet checks the value of the TARGET_64BIT and TARGET_HARD_FLOAT macros, and based on their values, it calls the d_add_builtin_version function with a specific string literal as an argument. The function is called twice in total, once for each branch of the if-else statement." GCC,riscv,39,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `gcc_assert ( REG_P ( dest ) ) ;` This statement is an assertion that the `dest` register is a valid register. If the assertion fails, the program will abort with an error message." GCC,riscv,40,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `case MULT: if (op1_val.is_constant()) return op1_val.to_constant() * op2_val;` This is a `case` statement within a `switch` block, where the `switch` block is checking the value of `GET_CODE(expr)`. The `case` statement is checking for the value `MULT`, and if it matches, it will execute the code within the `case` statement. In this case, the code within the `case` statement is checking if `op" GCC,riscv,41,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be a call to the `rtx_equal_p` function, which compares two rtx expressions for equality. The function takes two arguments: the first is the rtx expression to be compared, and the second is the rtx expression to be compared against. In this case, the first argument is `src`, which is the result of extracting the source operand from the `SET_SRC` pattern of the last instruction. The second argument is `CONSTM1_RTX(mode)`, which is a constant rtx expression that represents" GCC,riscv,42,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `run_poly_int_selftests` function and the data it operates on. However, based on the name of the function, it is likely that the next statement will be a call to a function that runs self-tests for a polynomial integer." GCC,riscv,43,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `riscv_reinit();` This statement is called after the `riscv_parse_arch_string` function is called with the `arch` argument and the `global_options` and `UNKNOWN_LOCATION` arguments. The `riscv_reinit` function is then called to reinitialize the RISC-V architecture and ABI." GCC,riscv,44,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be: rtx ele = const_double_from_real_value ( f , inner_mode ) ; This is because the previous statement in the code snippet is: REAL_VALUE_TYPE f = REAL_VALUE_ATOF ( , inner_mode ) ; And the variable ""f"" is being passed as an argument to the function ""const_double_from_real_value"" to create a constant double value from the real value ""f""." GCC,riscv,45,"The next statement in the code snippet is: `rtx_insn * insn = get_last_insn ( ) ;` This line of code gets the last instruction in the current sequence, which is the `emit_move_insn` instruction that was just generated. The `insn` variable will be used to access the instruction and its operands in the following lines of code." GCC,riscv,46,"The next statement is: `ASSERT_TRUE(known_eq(calculate_x_in_sequence(dest), poly_val));` This statement is an assertion that the value of `calculate_x_in_sequence(dest)` is equal to `poly_val`. The `ASSERT_TRUE` macro is used to check the assertion and generate an error message if the assertion fails. The `known_eq` function is used to compare the two values and determine if they are equal." GCC,riscv,47,"This code snippet is defining a vector of `poly_int64` values, where each value is a product of a literal and a constant. The vector is initialized with a list of values, where each value is either a positive or negative integer multiple of `BYTES_PER_RISCV_VECTOR`. The next statement in this code snippet is likely to be a loop that iterates over the elements of the `worklist` vector and performs some operation on each element. Without more context, it's not possible to determine exactly what the next statement will be." GCC,riscv,48,"The next statement after the code snippet you provided is: `set_new_first_and_last_insn(NULL, NULL);` This statement is setting the `new_first_insn` and `new_last_insn` fields of the `rtl_dump_test` structure to `NULL`." GCC,riscv,49,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `rtl_dump_test` class and the `locate_file` function. However, based on the code provided, it appears that the next statement will be a call to the `locate_file` function, which is a member function of the `rtl_dump_test` class. The `locate_file` function is not defined in the code snippet provided, so it is not possible to determine its exact behavior. However, based on its name and the" GCC,riscv,50,"The next statement in this code snippet is: `riscv_parse_arch_string(m_arch_backup.c_str(), &global_options, UNKNOWN_LOCATION);` This statement is calling the `riscv_parse_arch_string` function with the following arguments: * `m_arch_backup.c_str()`: This is a C-style string that contains the architecture string to be parsed. * `&global_options`: This is a pointer to a `riscv_global_options` structure that will be filled in" GCC,riscv,51,"The next statement after the given code snippet is likely to be a call to the `riscv_parse_arch_string` function, which is a part of the RISC-V architecture. The function takes three arguments: a string representing the architecture, a pointer to a `global_options` structure, and a location identifier. The `riscv_parse_arch_string` function is used to parse the architecture string and extract the relevant information, such as the number of registers, the size of the instruction set, and the supported instruction set extensions. The parsed information is then stored in the `global" GCC,riscv,52,"Based on the code snippet you provided, it appears to be related to the optimization of memory accesses in a compiler. The code is initializing some data structures for tracking the number of sets and references to registers, and then iterating over the instructions in a basic block to find memory accesses that can be optimized. The next statement is likely to be a check for whether the memory access is a load or a store, since the code is currently checking the type of the instruction (using the `NONJUMP_INSN_P` macro) and the pattern of the instruction (using the `PAT" GCC,riscv,53,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `if (i == ) {` This is because the code is checking if the value of `i` is equal to ``, and if it is, it will execute the code inside the `if` statement." GCC,riscv,54,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be: `m = analyze(bb);` This is because the `if` statement checks if the basic block `bb` should be optimized for speed, and if it should, the `continue` statement will skip the rest of the loop body and move on to the next iteration. If the `if` statement is not true, then the `analyze` function will be called with the basic block `bb` as an argument." GCC,riscv,55,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be the call to the `transform` function, which is used to apply the optimization to the basic block `bb`. The `transform` function takes two arguments: the `regno_map` object `m` and the basic block `bb`. The `regno_map` object is used to keep track of the mapping between registers and their corresponding memory locations, and the basic block is the block of code that is being optimized. The `transform` function is likely to perform the actual optimization by iterating over the instructions in the basic block and applying the appropriate" GCC,riscv,56,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be a loop that iterates over all the basic blocks (BB) in the function (fn). The loop will execute the code inside the loop body for each basic block in the function. Here is a possible next statement: ``` FOR_ALL_BB_FN ( bb , fn ) { // code to be executed for each basic block in the function } ``` This code snippet is using the FOR_ALL_BB_FN macro to iterate over all the basic blocks in the function. The macro takes two arguments: the" GCC,riscv,57,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `optimize_bb_for_speed_p` function and the contents of the `bb` variable. However, based on the name of the function and the fact that it is being called with a `bb` variable, it is likely that the next statement will be related to optimizing the performance of the code in the `bb` block. Without more information, it is not possible to provide a more specific prediction of the next statement. If you have additional context or information about" GCC,riscv,58,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `XEXP ( XEXP ( pat , i ) , ) = replace_equiv_address ( XEXP ( mem , ) , addr ) ;` This statement is part of a loop that iterates over the operands of a SET pattern, and it is trying to replace the equivalent address of a memory operand with a legitimized address. The `replace_equiv_address` function is used to perform this replacement. The first argument is the memory operand, and the second" GCC,riscv,59,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific values of the variables and the behavior of the functions being called. However, based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the next statement will be: `if (regno == ) {` This is because the code is checking the value of `regno` against the value of `NUM_LIT` in order to determine whether or not to execute the code inside the `if` statement. If `regno` is equal to `NUM_LIT`," GCC,riscv,60,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be: `return TARGET_RVC && riscv_mshorten_memrefs && optimize > ;` This statement is a boolean expression that checks if the target architecture is RISC-V with compressed instructions (TARGET_RVC), if memory references should be shortened (riscv_mshorten_memrefs), and if the optimization level is greater than a certain value (optimize > ). If all of these conditions are true, the function will return true" GCC,riscv,61,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be a comparison of the `TARGET_RVC` and `riscv_mshorten_memrefs` variables, and the `optimize` variable with the value ``. Here's a breakdown of the code snippet: * `TARGET_RVC`: This is a macro that expands to a boolean value indicating whether the target architecture is RISC-V. * `riscv_mshorten_memrefs`: This is a macro that expands to a boolean value indicating whether" GCC,riscv,62,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be a comparison of the `mem` variable with a specific value, as the code is checking if `mem` is a valid memory location and if its mode is equal to `SImode`. Here's a possible prediction of the next statement: ``` if (mem != || GET_MODE ( mem ) != SImode) return false; ``` Note that `` is a placeholder for a specific value that is not known at this point, and `SImode` is a" GCC,riscv,63,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be a comparison of the value returned by `GET_CODE` with the `PLUS` operator. The `GET_CODE` function returns the opcode of the expression `*addr`, which is a memory reference. The `REG_P` function checks if the expression `XEXP ( *addr , )` is a register. Therefore, the next statement is likely to be a check if the opcode of the memory reference is `PLUS` and if the expression `XEXP ( *addr ," GCC,riscv,64,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be the creation of a new instance of the `rtl_opt_pass` class, which is a subclass of the `gcc::context` class. The `make_pass_shorten_memrefs` function is likely to be a factory function that creates and returns a new instance of the `rtl_opt_pass` class. Here is an example of how the next statement of this code snippet might look like: ``` rtl_opt_pass *pass = make_pass_shorten_memrefs(ctxt); ```" GCC,riscv,65,"The next statement in the code snippet is: `pass_shorten_memrefs ( gcc :: context * ctxt ) : rtl_opt_pass ( pass_data_shorten_memrefs , ctxt ) {` This statement is a constructor for the `pass_shorten_memrefs` class, which inherits from the `rtl_opt_pass` class. The constructor initializes the `pass_shorten_memrefs` object with the `pass_data_shorten_memrefs` object and the `ctxt` object." GCC,riscv,66,"The next statement in the code snippet is: `pass_shorten_memrefs ( gcc :: context * ctxt ) : rtl_opt_pass ( pass_data_shorten_memrefs , ctxt ) {` This statement is a constructor for the `pass_shorten_memrefs` class, which inherits from the `rtl_opt_pass` class. The constructor initializes the `pass_shorten_memrefs` object with the `pass_data_shorten_memrefs` object and the `ctxt` object." GCC,riscv,67,"Based on the code snippet you provided, it appears to be part of a function that is optimizing memory accesses in a compiler. The function is iterating over the instructions in a basic block and checking if they are memory accesses. If they are, it is checking if the memory access is to a register and if so, it is checking if the register is a valid memory base register. The next statement of the code snippet you provided is: if ( XEXP ( pat , ) == CONST0_RTX ( GET_MODE ( XEXP ( pat" GCC,riscv,68,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `tmp = NEXT_INSN ( tmp ) ;` This is because the `do-while` loop will continue to execute as long as `tmp` is not `NULL` and `NOTE_P ( tmp )` is `true`. The loop will terminate when `tmp` is `NULL` or `NOTE_P ( tmp )` is `false`. Therefore, the next statement after the `do-while` loop will be the statement following the loop, which is `tmp = NEXT_INSN ( tmp" GCC,riscv,69,"The code snippet you provided is part of a function that appears to be analyzing a control flow graph. The function is iterating over the instructions in the graph and checking if each instruction is a call instruction or not. If the instruction is a call instruction, it increments a counter. If the instruction is not a call instruction, it continues to the next instruction. Based on the code snippet you provided, the next statement of the code would be: `df_ref use;` This line declares a variable `use` of type `df_ref`, which is likely a data structure used" GCC,riscv,70,"Based on the code snippet provided, it is difficult to predict the next statement with certainty. However, based on the context and the control flow of the code, it is likely that the next statement will be: `if ( ! call_used_regs [ DF_REF_REGNO ( use ) ] ) {` This is because the code is currently iterating over the uses of the instruction `insn` using the `FOR_EACH_INSN_USE` macro, and the next use is likely to be a register that is not a call-used register. If" GCC,riscv,71,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `if ( ! call_used_regs [ DF_REF_REGNO ( use ) ] ) {`" GCC,riscv,72,The next statement after the `if` block is `good_use = false;`. GCC,riscv,73,The next statement after the `if` block is `good_use = false;`. GCC,riscv,74,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be a `return` statement, as the code is checking for various conditions and returning if any of them are not met. The code is checking if the current function is a good use of the `epilogue_count` variable, and if the `epilogue_count` is equal to a certain value. If any of these conditions are not met, the code returns. The code is also checking if the current function is a good use of the `call_count` variable, and if the `call_count` is greater than a certain" GCC,riscv,75,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `insn = NEXT_INSN (insn);` This line of code is executed after the `if` statement that checks the `INSN_CODE` of the current instruction. If the `INSN_CODE` is not `CODE_FOR_stack_tiesi` or `CODE_FOR_stack_tiedi`, the function returns `NULL`. Otherwise, the function continues to the next instruction and sets `insn` to the next instruction in the sequence." GCC,riscv,76,"This code snippet is a function that takes an `insn` parameter and checks if it is a valid instruction for saving a general-purpose register (GPR). If the instruction is valid, the function returns the `insn` parameter, otherwise it returns `NULL`. The function checks if the `insn` parameter is a valid instruction by checking if it has a specific code (`CODE_FOR_gpr_save`) and if its pattern is a `PARALLEL` vector. It then checks if the first element of the `PARALLEL` vector is an `UNSPEC" GCC,riscv,77,"The next statement in this code snippet is the return statement, which returns the value `false`." GCC,riscv,78,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the `apply_mask_policy_p` function depends on the specific implementation of the `MaskPolicy` class and the input data. However, based on the name of the function and the fact that it is marked as `const`, it is likely that the function returns a boolean value indicating whether the mask policy is applied successfully. The function may also perform other operations related to the mask policy, such as updating the mask or checking for conflicts with other policies." GCC,riscv,79,The next statement after `return false;` would be the end of the function or method. GCC,riscv,80,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be a return statement, as the code snippet ends with a semicolon (;) and the previous statement is a return statement. Therefore, the next statement of this code snippet is likely to be: return CP_READ_MEMORY | CP_WRITE_CSR;" GCC,riscv,81,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be a return statement, as the code snippet ends with a semicolon (;) and the previous statement is a return statement. Therefore, the next statement of this code snippet is likely to be: return CP_READ_MEMORY | CP_WRITE_CSR;" GCC,riscv,82,The next statement after the code snippet you provided is likely to be a closing curly brace `}` to indicate the end of the function or method. GCC,riscv,83,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the `can_be_overloaded_p` function depends on the specific implementation of the `predication_type_index` enum and the `override` keyword. However, based on the name of the function and the fact that it is marked as `override`, it is likely that this function is intended to be an override of a virtual function in a base class, and it is expected to return a boolean value indicating whether the current object can be overloaded with the specified `pred` value." GCC,riscv,84,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific values of the variables and the behavior of the `GET_MODE` function. However, based on the name of the function and the context in which it is used, it is likely that the next statement will be a comparison or a switch statement that determines the next action to take based on the value of `mode`." GCC,riscv,85,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `rtx vlenb = gen_int_mode ( BYTES_PER_RISCV_VECTOR , mode ) ;` This statement is generating a new rtx value called `vlenb` that represents the number of bytes in a RISC-V vector. The `gen_int_mode` function is used to generate an integer value in the specified mode, which in this case is the mode of the target of the function expander `e`. The `BYTES_PER_RISCV_VECT" GCC,riscv,86,"It's difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet without knowing the context in which it is being executed. The code appears to be part of a larger program that is manipulating data structures and performing operations on them. The code snippet you provided is using a number of functions and variables that are not defined in the snippet itself, so it's not possible to determine the exact behavior of the code without knowing the definitions of these functions and variables. However, based on the names of the functions and variables, it appears that the code is working with a data structure that represents a function call, and it is modifying" GCC,riscv,87,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `get_read_vl_decl` function and the `gimple_build_call` function. However, based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the next statement will be a call to the `gimple_call_set_lhs` function, which sets the left-hand side of the call expression to the value of the `tmp_var` variable." GCC,riscv,88,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return true;` This statement will be executed if the condition `UNSPEC == UNSPEC_VSLIDEUP` is not true." GCC,riscv,89,"The next statement of this code snippet is: return false;" GCC,riscv,90,"The next statement of this code snippet is: return false;" GCC,riscv,91,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `function_instance` function and the `add_unique_function` method. However, based on the names of the functions and variables, it is likely that the next statement will be related to the creation and registration of a new function or method. Here are a few possibilities: 1. The next statement could be a call to the `function_instance` function to create a new function instance, passing in the `group.base_name`, `group.base`, `group" GCC,riscv,92,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific values of the variables and the behavior of the program. However, we can make an educated guess based on the information provided. The code snippet is a loop that iterates over the elements of an array `group.preds` and checks if each element is equal to a constant `NUM_PRED_TYPES`. If the element is not equal to `NUM_PRED_TYPES`, the loop continues to the next iteration. Based on this information, it is likely" GCC,riscv,93,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific values of the variables and the behavior of the program. However, we can make an educated guess based on the information provided. The code snippet is a loop that iterates over the elements of an array `group.preds` and checks if each element is equal to a constant `NUM_PRED_TYPES`. If the element is not equal to `NUM_PRED_TYPES`, the loop continues to the next iteration. Based on this information, it is likely" GCC,riscv,94,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `function_instance` and `tree` classes, as well as the values of the variables `group`, `vec_type_idx`, and `pred_idx`. However, based on the code snippet you provided, it appears that the next statement is likely to be a call to the `function_instance` constructor, which takes several arguments including a `group` object, a `base_name` string, a `base` pointer, a `shape` pointer, a `types" GCC,riscv,95,"The next statement after the code snippet you provided is likely to be a call to the `auto_vec` constructor, which initializes the `argument_types` variable with the specified type and number of elements. Here's an example of what the next statement might look like: ``` auto_vec> argument_types(); ``` This statement creates a new `auto_vec` object with the specified type and number of elements, and assigns it to the `argument_types` variable. The `, , nvecs - );` This is because the `check` function is defined to return a `bool` value, and the last statement executed in the function is the `return` statement. The `return` statement is likely to be the next statement executed after the `check` function is called. It's worth noting that the `check` function is defined as an override of a base class method" GCC,riscv,97,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific values of the variables and the behavior of the functions being called. However, based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the next statement will be: `b.append_name(predication_suffixes[instance.pred])` This is because the code checks if `overloaded_p` is true and if `instance.pred` is equal to `PRED_TYPE_m`, and if so, it returns the result of `b.finish_name" GCC,riscv,98,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be a call to the `add_operand` function, which adds an operand to the current instruction. The function takes two arguments: the first is the mode of the operand, and the second is the operand itself. In this case, the operand is `CONSTM1_RTX ( mode )`, which is a constant operand with a value of -1. Therefore, the next statement of this code snippet is likely to be: ``` add_operand ( mode , CONSTM1_RTX ( mode" GCC,riscv,99,"The next statement after the code snippet you provided is: `return tree_cons ( get_identifier ( name ) , NULL_TREE , attrs ) ;` This statement is a function call to `tree_cons`, which is a function that creates a new tree node with the specified identifier and attributes. The `get_identifier` function is used to get the identifier for the tree node, and the `NULL_TREE` constant is used to indicate that the node has no children. The `attrs` parameter is the list of attributes for the node. The `tree_cons" GCC,riscv,100,"The next statement after the code snippet you provided is likely to be the return statement of the function that contains this code. In C, the `return` statement is used to return a value from a function. In this case, the function is returning a value of type `tree`, which is a data structure that represents a tree-like data structure in the compiler. The `tree_cons` function is used to create a new tree node, and the `get_identifier` function is used to get the identifier (i.e., the name) of the node. The `NULL_TREE`" GCC,riscv,101,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `create_fixed_operand` function and the values of the variables `m_ops`, `opno`, and `x`. However, based on the code snippet you provided, it appears that the `create_fixed_operand` function is being called with the address of the next element in the `m_ops` array as the first argument, and the value of the `x` variable as the second argument. The `opno` variable is being incremented after" GCC,riscv,102,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `unsigned int code = vec_safe_length(registered_functions);` This line of code calculates the length of the `registered_functions` vector and stores it in the `code` variable. The `vec_safe_length` function is used to ensure that the length is calculated correctly, even if the vector is modified concurrently." GCC,riscv,103,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet without knowing the specific implementation of the `function_expander` class and the `add_input_operand` method. However, based on the name of the method and the parameters it takes, it is likely that the next statement will be related to adding an input operand to the function being expanded. Here are a few possibilities: 1. The method may add the input operand to a list of input operands for the function. 2. The method may generate code to load the input operand into a register. 3." GCC,riscv,104,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `create_input_operand` function and the values of the variables `m_ops`, `op`, and `mode`. However, based on the syntax and the fact that the function is being called with the address of an element of the `m_ops` array, it is likely that the next statement will be an assignment to that element of the array, such as: `m_ops[opno] = create_input_operand(op, mode);`" GCC,riscv,105,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `create_integer_operand(&m_ops[opno++], INTVAL(x));` This statement creates an integer operand and adds it to the `m_ops` array. The `opno` variable is incremented after the operand is added to the array. The `INTVAL(x)` expression evaluates to the integer value of the `x` operand." GCC,riscv,106,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `create_integer_operand` function and the values of the `m_ops` and `opno` variables. However, based on the code snippet provided, it is likely that the next statement after the `create_integer_operand` function call will be an increment of the `opno` variable, as it is likely that the function will have incremented the `opno` variable to point to the next available operand in the `m_ops` array." GCC,riscv,107,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be a call to `emit_insn` or a related function to emit the memory reference instruction into the RTL representation of the program. Here's a breakdown of the code snippet: * `gen_rtx_MEM` is a function that creates a new RTX node representing a memory reference. It takes two arguments: `mode`, which specifies the machine mode of the memory reference, and `memory_address`, which specifies the address of the memory location being referenced. * `memory_address` is a function that" GCC,riscv,108,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `m_ops[opno++] = target;` This statement is assigning the value of `target` to the next element in the `m_ops` array, which is at index `opno`. The `++` operator is used to increment `opno` after the assignment, so that the next element in the array will be assigned to the next time the function is called." GCC,riscv,109,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `add_input_operand ( mode , gen_scalar_move_mask ( mode ) ) ;` This statement adds an input operand to the current instruction, with the mode and scalar move mask operand as arguments. The `add_input_operand` function is used to add an input operand to the current instruction, and the `gen_scalar_move_mask` function is used to generate the scalar move mask operand. The `mode` argument is used to specify the machine mode of the operand." GCC,riscv,110,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `TYPE_ATTRIBUTES (type) = tree_cons (get_identifier (), value, TYPE_ATTRIBUTES (type));` This statement is adding a new attribute to the `TYPE_ATTRIBUTES` list of the `type` tree. The attribute is a `tree_cons` node, which consists of a `get_identifier` node (which represents the name of the attribute) and a `value` node (which represents the value of the attribute" GCC,riscv,111,"The next statement after the code snippet you provided is: `TYPE_ATTRIBUTES ( type ) = tree_cons ( get_identifier ( ) , value , TYPE_ATTRIBUTES ( type ) ) ;` This statement is adding a new attribute to the `TYPE_ATTRIBUTES` list of the `type` variable. The attribute is a `tree` object that contains the `mangled_name_tree` and `NULL_TREE` values. The `get_identifier` function is used to" GCC,riscv,112,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `function_expander` class and the `add_vundef_operand` method. However, based on the name of the method and the parameter it takes, it is likely that the next statement will add an undefined operand to the function expander's operand list. In general, the `add_vundef_operand` method is used to add a new operand to the function expander's operand list, and the `machine_mode" GCC,riscv,113,"The next statement of this code snippet is: for ( unsigned int i = ; i < ; i++ ) { This is a for loop that initializes a variable `i` to a value `` and increments it by 1 until it reaches a value ``. The loop body is not shown in the code snippet." GCC,riscv,114,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the code depends on the specific implementation of the `function_instance` class and the `vec` class, as well as the input data. However, based on the name of the function and the variables used, it is likely that the next statement will be related to allocating memory for the argument types of the function instance. This could involve creating a new vector of `tree` objects, each representing a different argument type, and storing them in the `argument_types` vector. Without more information" GCC,riscv,115,"The code snippet is checking if any of the arguments passed to a function have a floating-point type. The `for` loop iterates over the arguments, and for each argument, it checks if its base type is not equal to `NUM_BASE_TYPES`. If the base type is not equal to `NUM_BASE_TYPES`, it means that the argument is a floating-point type, and the function returns `true`. Therefore, the next statement of this code snippet would be the `return true` statement." GCC,riscv,116,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the `append_name` function is not specified. However, based on the name of the function and the fact that it is being called with a string literal and a variable named `name`, it is likely that the function appends the string literal to the variable `name`. Therefore, the next statement of this code snippet could be any statement that uses the updated value of the `name` variable, such as printing it to the console or assigning it to another variable." GCC,riscv,117,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `append_name(name);` This is because the `append_base_name` function takes a `const char *` argument, which is a pointer to a string literal. The `` placeholder is used to indicate that the function should append the string literal represented by the `name` argument to the current name being built." GCC,riscv,118,"The next statement after the `obstack_grow` function call is likely to be a call to `obstack_finish`, which finalizes the construction of the string object and returns a pointer to the finished string. Here's an example of what the next statement might look like: ``` char *finished_string = obstack_finish ( &m_string_obstack ) ; ``` This statement retrieves a pointer to the finished string object and assigns it to the `finished_string` variable." GCC,riscv,119,"The next statement after the `obstack_grow` function call is likely to be a call to `obstack_finish`, which finalizes the construction of the string object and returns a pointer to the finished string. Here's an example of what the next statement might look like: ``` char *finished_string = obstack_finish ( &m_string_obstack ) ; ``` This statement retrieves a pointer to the finished string object and assigns it to the `finished_string` variable." GCC,riscv,120,The next statement after the `break` statement is the `case` statement with the label ``. GCC,riscv,121,"The next statement after the given code snippet would be the body of the `apply_mask_policy_p` function. Since the function is declared as `inline`, the compiler will likely inline the function call and replace it with the function body. Therefore, the next statement after the given code snippet would be the first statement inside the `apply_mask_policy_p` function, which is the `return true;` statement." GCC,riscv,122,"The next statement after the given code snippet would be the body of the `apply_mask_policy_p` function. Since the function is declared as `inline`, the compiler will likely inline the function call and replace it with the function body. Therefore, the next statement after the given code snippet would be the first statement inside the `apply_mask_policy_p` function, which is the `return true;` statement." GCC,riscv,123,"This code snippet is defining a function called `function_builder::apply_predication`. It takes three arguments: `instance`, `return_type`, and `argument_types`. The function first checks if the `base` of the `instance` has a merge operand. If it does, it inserts a new tree with the `return_type` and a literal value `` into the `argument_types` vector. Next, it gets the `mask_type_index` from the `function_types` array and uses it to get the `mask_" GCC,riscv,124,The next statement after `return true ;` would be the end of the function or method. GCC,riscv,125,"The next statement after the given code snippet is: `return true;`" GCC,riscv,126,"The next statement after the `return` statement in the code snippet is not provided, so it is not possible to predict what the next statement will be. The `return` statement is the last statement in the code snippet, so there is no next statement to execute after the `return` statement." GCC,riscv,127,"The next statement of this code snippet is: return build_pointer_type ( build_qualified_type ( t , TYPE_QUAL_CONST ) ) ;" GCC,riscv,128,"The next statement after the given code snippet is likely to be the return statement, which would return the constructed pointer type. The code snippet is building a pointer type by calling the `build_pointer_type` function and passing it the result of calling the `build_qualified_type` function with the type `t` and the type qualifier `TYPE_QUAL_CONST`. The `build_qualified_type` function returns a new type that is the same as the original type but with the specified qualifier added. In this case, the type `t` is being qualified as `const" GCC,riscv,129,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `function_base` class and the `function_instance` class, as well as the input data and any external factors that may affect the behavior of the program. However, based on the name of the function and the parameters it takes, it is likely that the next statement will be a call to a function that is a member of the `function_base` class, and that the function will use the `instance` parameter to perform some operation on the `function_instance` object" GCC,riscv,130,"The next statement after the `if` block would be the `return` statement, which returns the value of `flags` with the bits `CP_READ_FPCR` and `CP_RAISE_FP_EXCEPTIONS` set." GCC,riscv,131,"The next statement of this code snippet is: return true;" GCC,riscv,132,"The next statement of this code snippet is: return true;" GCC,riscv,133,The next statement after `return true ;` would be the end of the function or method. GCC,riscv,134,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `check_builtin_call` function and the data structures it uses. However, based on the code snippet you provided, it appears that the function is checking whether a built-in function call is valid. The function takes several arguments, including a `location_t` object, a vector of `location_t` objects, an `unsigned int` code, a `tree` object representing a function declaration, an `unsigned int` representing the number of arguments, and an array of" GCC,riscv,135,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `if (required_extensions_p(op_info->args[i].base_type)) {` This is because the `for` loop is currently iterating over the `op_info->args` array, and the current value of `i` is `0`. The `if` statement checks whether the `base_type` of the current argument is a required extension, and if so, it sets the `required_extensions` flag accordingly." GCC,riscv,136,"The next statement after the `if` statements in the code snippet is `return false;`. The first `if` statement checks if the `CP_RAISE_FP_EXCEPTIONS` flag is set in the `flags` variable. If it is set, the function returns `true`. The second `if` statement checks if either the `CP_READ_MEMORY` or `CP_WRITE_MEMORY` flag is set in the `flags` variable. If either of these flags is set, the function returns `true`. If neither of the above" GCC,riscv,137,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the `call_properties` function is not specified. However, based on the name of the function and the context in which it is being called, it is likely that the function returns a set of flags that indicate whether the function could trap or not. Therefore, the next statement of the code snippet is likely to be a check of the flags returned by `call_properties` to determine whether the function could trap or not. For example: ``` if (flags & CALL_PROPERTY_" GCC,riscv,138,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be: `return value.first == key.first && value.second == key.second;` This is because the `equal` function is typically used to compare two values of the same type, and in this case, the `value_type` and `compare_type` are both `std::pair`, so the function is comparing the `first` and `second` elements of each pair." GCC,riscv,139,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return base->expand(*this);` This statement is calling the `expand` method of the `base` object, passing `*this` as an argument. The `expand` method is expected to return a value of type `rtx`, which is then returned by the `function_expander::expand` method." GCC,riscv,140,"The next statement after `return base -> expand ( * this ) ;` would be the statement that follows the function call. However, without knowing the context of the code, it's difficult to predict what that statement would be. It's possible that the function call is the last statement in the function, in which case the next statement would be the end of the function. Alternatively, it's possible that the function call is part of a larger expression or statement, in which case the next statement would be the next part of that expression or statement. Without more information about the code, it'" GCC,riscv,141,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `rtx exp = expand_builtin_expr (code, exp, target);` This statement is calling the `expand_builtin_expr` function with the `code`, `exp`, and `target` arguments, and assigning the result to the `exp` variable." GCC,riscv,142,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return function_expander(rfn.instance, rfn.decl, exp, target).expand();` This statement is calling the `expand` method of the `function_expander` object, which is being constructed with the `instance`, `decl`, `exp`, and `target` parameters. The `expand` method is then being called on the resulting object, and its return value is being returned from the `expand_builtin` function." GCC,riscv,143,"The next statement after the `return` statement in the code snippet you provided is the closing brace `}` of the function. The `return` statement is used to return a value from a function. In this case, the function is returning a pointer to a character array, which is the result of calling the `obstack_finish` function on the `m_string_obstack` object. The `obstack_finish` function is used to finalize the construction of an object on an obstack, and it returns a pointer to the object. Therefore, the next statement after" GCC,riscv,144,"The next statement of this code snippet is: return m_string_obstack.finish();" GCC,riscv,145,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `lang_GNU_CXX` function and the `gcc_obstack_init` function. However, based on the names of the functions and the context in which they are being called, it is likely that the next statement will be a call to the `gcc_obstack_init` function to initialize the `m_string_obstack` object." GCC,riscv,146,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the implementation of the `function_builder` class and the specific inputs and context in which it is being used. However, based on the name of the class and the fact that it is being used to build a function, it is likely that the next statement will involve the creation or manipulation of a function object or the definition of a function. Without more information, it is not possible to provide a more specific prediction of the next statement. If you have any additional context or information about the code snippet, I would" GCC,riscv,147,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be the initialization of the `fndecl` member variable, which is done by assigning the value of `fndecl_in` to `fndecl`. Here's the full code snippet with the next statement added: ``` function_call_info :: function_call_info ( location_t location_in , const function_instance & instance_in , tree fndecl_in ) : function_instance ( instance_in ) , location ( location_in ) , fndecl ( fndecl" GCC,riscv,148,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be the initialization of the `fndecl` member variable, which is done by assigning the value of `fndecl_in` to `fndecl`. Here's the full code snippet with the next statement added: ``` function_call_info :: function_call_info ( location_t location_in , const function_instance & instance_in , tree fndecl_in ) : function_instance ( instance_in ) , location ( location_in ) , fndecl ( fndecl" GCC,riscv,149,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be the initialization of the member variables of the `function_call_info` class, which is the base class of `function_checker`. The `function_call_info` class is defined in the `tree.h` header file, and it has the following member variables: * `location_t location`: a location in the source code where the function call is located * `const function_instance & instance`: a reference to the function instance that is being called * `tree fndecl`: a pointer to the function declaration" GCC,riscv,150,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be the initialization of the member variables of the `function_call_info` class, which is the base class of `function_checker`. The `function_call_info` class is defined in the `tree.h` header file, and it has the following member variables: * `location_t location`: a location in the source code where the function call is located * `const function_instance & instance`: a reference to the function instance that is being called * `tree fndecl`: a pointer to the function declaration" GCC,riscv,151,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `opno = ;` Explanation: The code snippet defines a constructor for a class called `function_expander`. The constructor takes four arguments: `instance`, `fndecl_in`, `exp_in`, and `target_in`. It initializes the base class `function_call_info` with the `EXPR_LOCATION` of `exp_in` and the other arguments. It also initializes the member variables `exp` and `target` with the corresponding arguments." GCC,riscv,152,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `this->base_name = base_name_in;` This is because the constructor is initializing the member variables of the `function_instance` class, and the first member variable is `base_name`, which is being assigned the value of the `base_name_in` parameter." GCC,riscv,153,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `this->base_name = base_name_in;` This is because the constructor is initializing the member variables of the `function_instance` class, and the first member variable is `base_name`, which is being assigned the value of the `base_name_in` parameter." GCC,riscv,154,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the function `function_call_info` is not specified. However, based on the name of the function and the fact that it is declared to return a `bool` value, it is likely that the next statement will be a `return` statement that returns a boolean value indicating whether the function call returns void or not." GCC,riscv,155,"The code snippet you provided is a part of a function called `function_expander` that appears to be related to the generation of instructions for a compiler. The function takes an `insn_code` argument and uses it to retrieve information about the instruction from a table called `insn_data`. The first statement in the function is a `gcc_assert` macro that checks if the number of operands (`opno`) passed to the function matches the number of operands expected for the instruction (`insn_data[icode].n_generator_args`). If the assertion fails, the function will terminate" GCC,riscv,156,"The next statement after the `if` block is the `error` function call. The `error` function is called with the string literal `` as its argument. The `error` function will print an error message to the console and terminate the program. Therefore, the next statement of this code snippet is: ``` error(""""); ```" GCC,riscv,157,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet without knowing the context and the data structures involved. However, based on the syntax and the names of the variables, it appears that the code is trying to retrieve the type of an argument for a specific operation. The `op_info` variable is likely an object that contains information about the operation, and the `args` field is an array of arguments for the operation. The `opno` field is likely an index into the `args` array, and the `get_tree_type` method is being called on the argument at that index." GCC,riscv,158,"The next statement of this code snippet is: attrs = add_attribute(, attrs); This is because the code checks if the function instance modifies global state, and if it does not, it adds the attribute to the tree attrs. The else branch of the if statement is not executed, so the next statement is the one that adds the attribute to attrs." GCC,riscv,159,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return type ? function_types[type_idx].type_indexes[base_type] : NUM_VECTOR_TYPES;` This statement is a ternary operator that returns the value of `function_types[type_idx].type_indexes[base_type]` if `type` is not equal to `NULL`, and `NUM_VECTOR_TYPES` otherwise." GCC,riscv,160,"This code snippet is defining a function called `vector_type_index` that takes a `vector_type_index` argument called `type_idx`. The function returns a `tree` object that represents a vector type. The function first checks if the `type_idx` argument is a valid vector type index by checking if the `builtin_types` array contains a `function_types` object at the index specified by `type_idx`. If the `builtin_types` array does not contain a `function_types` object at the specified index, the function returns `NUM_VECT" GCC,riscv,161,"The next statement after the `if` block will be the `return` statement outside of the `if` block. The `if` block will only be executed if `pred` is equal to `PRED_TYPE_tumu` or `PRED_TYPE_mu`. If `pred` is not equal to either of those values, the `return` statement outside of the `if` block will be executed. Therefore, the next statement after the `if` block will be the `return` statement outside of the `if` block, which will return the result of `gen" GCC,riscv,162,"The next statement after the `if` block will be the `return` statement outside of the `if` block. The `if` block will only be executed if `pred` is equal to `PRED_TYPE_tumu` or `PRED_TYPE_mu`. If `pred` is not equal to either of those values, the `return` statement outside of the `if` block will be executed. Therefore, the next statement after the `if` block will be the `return` statement outside of the `if` block, which will return the result of `gen" GCC,riscv,163,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `get_read_vl_instance` function and the `hash` function. However, based on the context, it is likely that the next statement will be a call to the `hash` function, passing in the `hashval_t` value returned by the `get_read_vl_instance` function. Here is an example of what the next statement might look like: ``` hashval_t hash = instance.hash(hash); ``` This statement would" GCC,riscv,164,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `function_instance` function and the values of the variables used in the function call. However, based on the syntax and the context of the code, it appears that the next statement after the `return` statement would be the end of the function. The `function_instance` function is being called with a number of arguments, including a string literal, a list of base values, a list of shape values, a list of none operations, a predicate type, and a pointer to a void" GCC,riscv,165,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `for (unsigned int i = ; b_ops[i].index != NUM_VECTOR_TYPES; i++)` This is the second loop in the code snippet, which iterates over the `b_ops` array and checks if the `type_idx` matches the `index` of any of the elements in the array. If a match is found, the `required_extensions` of the matching element are returned." GCC,riscv,166,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return builtin_types[type_idx].scalar_ptr;` This is because the `if` statement checks if `type_idx` is within the range of `VECTOR_TYPE_vbool64_t` and `VECTOR_TYPE_vbool1_t`, and if it is, it returns the `scalar_ptr` of `builtin_types[VECTOR_TYPE_vuint8mf8_t]`. Otherwise, it returns the `scalar_ptr` of `built" GCC,riscv,167,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return builtin_types[VECTOR_TYPE_vuint8mf8_t].scalar_ptr;` This statement returns the `scalar_ptr` member of the `builtin_types` array element with index `VECTOR_TYPE_vuint8mf8_t`." GCC,riscv,168,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return builtin_types[get_function_type_index(type_idx)].scalar;` This statement returns the scalar type of the function type with the index `type_idx` in the `builtin_types` array. If the function type is invalid, `NULL_TREE` is returned." GCC,riscv,169,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return builtin_types[get_function_type_index(type_idx)].scalar;` This statement returns the scalar type of the built-in vector type with the specified type index. If the type index is invalid or there is no built-in vector type with that index, the function returns `NULL_TREE`." GCC,riscv,170,"The next statement after the `if` block is the `return` statement, which returns a value of type `int` and mode `Pmode`. The value returned is the result of the `gen_int_mode` function, which is called with the arguments `TAIL_UNDISTURBED` and `Pmode`." GCC,riscv,171,"The next statement after the `if` block is the `return` statement, which returns a value of type `int` and mode `Pmode`. The value returned is the result of the `gen_int_mode` function, which is called with the arguments `TAIL_UNDISTURBED` and `Pmode`." GCC,riscv,172,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific values of the `RVV_BASE_` constants and the `TYPE` variable. However, based on the syntax and structure of the code, it appears that the next statement after the `switch` statement will be the `gcc_unreachable()` function call. The `switch` statement is used to select a specific case based on the value of the `RVV_BASE_` constant. The `default` case is used when no other case matches, and it calls the `" GCC,riscv,173,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return builtin_types[get_function_type_index(type_idx)].vector;` This statement returns the `vector` field of the `builtin_types` array element at index `get_function_type_index(type_idx)`. If the `get_function_type_index` function returns `VECTOR_TYPE_INVALID`, then the `NULL_TREE` value is returned instead." GCC,riscv,174,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return builtin_types[get_function_type_index(type_idx)].vector;` This statement returns the `vector` field of the `builtin_types` array element at index `get_function_type_index(type_idx)`. If the `get_function_type_index` function returns `VECTOR_TYPE_INVALID`, then the `NULL_TREE` value is returned instead." GCC,riscv,175,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `this->gsi = gsi_in;` This statement is initializing the `gsi` member variable of the `gimple_folder` class with the value of the `gsi_in` parameter." GCC,riscv,176,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `this->gsi = gsi_in;` This statement is initializing the `gsi` member variable of the `gimple_folder` class with the value of the `gsi_in` parameter." GCC,riscv,177,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of a code snippet without knowing the context and the purpose of the code. However, based on the function name `gimple_fold_builtin`, it appears to be related to the GIMPLE (GNU Intermediate Language for Embedded Processors) compiler infrastructure. GIMPLE is a low-level, intermediate representation of C code that is used by the GCC (GNU Compiler Collection) to generate optimized machine code for various platforms. The `gimple_fold_builtin` function is likely to be a part of" GCC,riscv,178,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `gimple_fold_builtin` function and the data stored in the `registered_functions` array. However, based on the code snippet you provided, it appears that the function is attempting to retrieve a registered function from the `registered_functions` array using the `code` parameter as an index. If the `code` parameter is a valid index into the `registered_functions` array, then the next statement of the code snippet is likely to be a call" GCC,riscv,179,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `gt_ggc_mx (function_instance *)` This is a function call to the `gt_ggc_mx` function, which is a part of the GCC garbage collector. The function takes a `function_instance *` parameter, which is a pointer to a `function_instance` structure. The `gt_ggc_mx` function is used to mark the `function_instance` structure as reachable, which means that it is still in use and should not be garbage collected." GCC,riscv,180,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `gt_ggc_mx (function_instance *)` This is a function call to the `gt_ggc_mx` function, which is a part of the GCC garbage collector. The function takes a `function_instance *` parameter, which is a pointer to a `function_instance` structure. The `gt_ggc_mx` function is used to mark the `function_instance` structure as reachable, which means that it is still in use and should not be garbage collected." GCC,riscv,181,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be a call to the `gt_pch_nx` function for the `function_instance` struct. The `gt_pch_nx` function is a part of the GCC garbage collector and is used to traverse the memory graph and mark objects for garbage collection. The `gt_pch_nx` function takes three arguments: a pointer to the object to be traversed, a pointer to the garbage collector's `gt_pointer_operator` function, and a pointer to the object's `void *` data. The" GCC,riscv,182,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be a call to the `gt_pch_nx` function for the `function_instance` struct. The `gt_pch_nx` function is a part of the GCC garbage collector and is used to traverse the memory graph and mark objects for garbage collection. The `gt_pch_nx` function takes three arguments: a pointer to the object to be traversed, a pointer to the garbage collector's `gt_pointer_operator` function, and a pointer to the object's `void *` data. The" GCC,riscv,183,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the code depends on the specific implementation of the `hash_table` and `registered_function_hasher` classes, as well as the input data and the state of the program at the time of execution. However, based on the code snippet provided, it is likely that the next statement will be an assignment to the `builder` variable, possibly using the `new` operator to create a new instance of the `registered_function_hasher` class. The `builder` variable is likely to" GCC,riscv,184,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `function_table->insert(new registered_function_hasher(type_i));` This statement inserts a new `registered_function_hasher` object into the `function_table` hash table, using the `type_i` variable as the key. The `registered_function_hasher` object is created with the `type_i` variable as its constructor argument, which is used to initialize the object's `type` field." GCC,riscv,185,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be the return value of the `hash()` method called on the `instance` object. In Python, the `->` operator is used to call a method on an object. In this case, the `hash()` method is being called on the `instance` object, and the return value of that method is being returned from the function. So, the next statement of this code snippet is likely to be the return value of the `hash()` method, which is an integer that represents the hash value of the `instance` object." GCC,riscv,186,The next statement after `return true ;` would be the end of the function or method. GCC,riscv,187,The next statement after `return true ;` would be the end of the function or method. GCC,riscv,188,"The next statement of the code snippet is: `rvv_switcher rvv = new rvv_switcher(rvv);` This statement creates a new instance of the `rvv_switcher` class, passing in the `rvv` object as an argument. The `rvv_switcher` class is a utility class that provides a way to switch between different vector implementations at runtime. The `rvv` object is an instance of the `rvv_switcher` class, and it is being used to switch between different vector implementations." GCC,riscv,189,"The next statement after the given code snippet is: `register_builtin_types ( ) ;` This is because the `if` statement that follows the `register_builtin_types ( ) ;` statement is only executed if `in_lto_p` is true, and the `handle_pragma_vector ( )` statement is only executed if `in_lto_p` is false. Since the `if` statement that follows the `register_builtin_types ( ) ;` statement is not executed, the next statement after the given code snippet is `register_" GCC,riscv,190,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `TYPE_ATTRIBUTES ( type ) = tree_cons ( get_identifier ( ) , NULL_TREE , TYPE_ATTRIBUTES ( type ) ) ;` This statement is adding a new attribute to the `TYPE_ATTRIBUTES` list of the `type` tree node. The attribute is a `tree_cons` node with a `get_identifier` as the first argument, a `NULL_TREE` as the second argument, and the `" GCC,riscv,191,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of a code snippet without knowing the context and the specific implementation of the function `mangle_builtin_type`. However, based on the name of the function and the parameters it takes, it is likely that the next statement will be related to the mangling of the built-in type represented by the `type` parameter. Some possible next statements could include: * Checking the type of the `type` parameter to determine which built-in type it represents * Using a switch statement or other control flow mechanism to handle the different built-in types that can" GCC,riscv,192,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return IDENTIFIER_POINTER ( id ) ;` This statement is executed if the `if` condition is true, which means that the `chain_index` function returned a non-null value. The `IDENTIFIER_POINTER` macro is used to extract the pointer to the identifier from the `id` variable, which is then returned as the result of the function." GCC,riscv,193,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet without knowing the context and the definitions of the variables and functions used in the snippet. However, based on the syntax and the information provided, it appears that the snippet is trying to return a value of type `TYPE_MODE` that is associated with a built-in type. The `builtin_types` array is an array of `TYPE` structures, and the `mask_type_index` variable is an index into this array. The `TYPE` structure has a field called `vector` that is a pointer to a `TYPE_MODE`" GCC,riscv,194,"The next statement after the `if` block will be the `return` statement. The `if` block will only be executed if the `flags` variable has the `CP_RAISE_FP_EXCEPTIONS` bit set. If this bit is set, the function will return `true`. If the bit is not set, the function will return the result of the bitwise AND operation between `flags` and `(CP_WRITE_MEMORY | CP_WRITE_CSR)`. Therefore, the next statement after the `if` block will be the `return` statement" GCC,riscv,195,"The next statement of this code snippet is: return flags & ( CP_WRITE_MEMORY | CP_WRITE_CSR ) ; Explanation: The code snippet first calls the function `call_properties` and assigns the return value to the variable `flags`. Then, it checks if the `CP_RAISE_FP_EXCEPTIONS` bit is set in the `flags` variable. If it is set, the function returns `true`. If it is not set, the function returns the result of the bitwise AND operation between `flags` and the" GCC,riscv,196,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return false;` Explanation: The `call_properties()` function returns a bitmask of flags that describe the properties of the current function call. The `CP_READ_FPCR` flag is set if the function reads the floating-point control register (FPCR). If the `CP_READ_FPCR` flag is not set, the function does not read the FPCR, and the `reads_global_state_p()` function returns `false`." GCC,riscv,197,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the `call_properties` function is not specified. However, based on the name of the function and the context in which it is called, it is likely that the function returns a set of flags that indicate the properties of the function, such as whether it reads or modifies the global state. Therefore, the next statement of the code snippet is likely to be a check of the `flags` variable to determine whether the function reads the global state. For example: ``` if (flags & READ" GCC,riscv,198,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific inputs and the behavior of the functions called. However, based on the context and the code structure, it is likely that the next statement will be a call to `build_pointer_type` or `build_const_pointer`, as these are the only functions called in the snippet that are not already called. Alternatively, the next statement could be a call to `build_vector_type_for_mode`, as this function is called in the `if` statement and is likely to be called" GCC,riscv,199,"The next statement in the code snippet is: `lang_hooks.types.register_builtin_type(vectype, vector_types[type].abi_name);` This statement registers the vector type `vectype` with the language hooks, using the ABI name of the vector type. The `register_builtin_type` function is used to register built-in types with the language hooks, and it is typically used to register types that are defined by the compiler or the standard library. The `vectype` parameter is the vector type that is" GCC,riscv,200,"The next statement in the code snippet is likely to be: `tree int32_type_node = get_typenode_from_name ( INT32_TYPE ) ;` This is because the code is registering built-in types, and the next type that is likely to be registered is the 32-bit integer type." GCC,riscv,201,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the `build` method depends on the implementation of the `Group` class and the `Shape` class, as well as any other classes that may be involved in the execution of the code. However, based on the syntax and the names of the classes and methods involved, it is likely that the `build` method is being called on an instance of the `Group` class, and that it is being passed an instance of the `Shape` class as an argument. The `build` method is then expected to" GCC,riscv,202,"The next statement is likely to be a call to `lang_hooks->decls.pushdecl` with the `decl` variable as an argument. This is because the previous statement assigned the result of `lang_hooks->decls.pushdecl` to the `decl` variable, and the next statement is likely to be a continuation of the same operation. Here's a breakdown of the code snippet: 1. `tree id = get_identifier(vector_types[type].name);`: This line retrieves the identifier for the vector type with the given `type`" GCC,riscv,203,"The next statement after the code snippet you provided is likely to be a call to the `error_at` function, which is a part of the GCC compiler's error reporting mechanism. The `error_at` function takes several arguments, including the location of the error, a string literal describing the error, and the argument number where the error occurred. In this case, the location of the error is specified using the `location` variable, and the string literal is specified using the `` and `` tokens. The argument number where the error occurred is specified using the" GCC,riscv,204,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be: `error_at ( location , , argno + , fndecl ) ;` This is because the `report_non_ice` function is defined as a `const` function, which means that it cannot modify any member variables of the class. Therefore, the only way to report an error is to call the `error_at` function, which is a member function of the `function_checker` class. The `error_at" GCC,riscv,205,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `error_at ( location , , actual , argno + , fndecl , min , max ) ;` This statement is calling the `error_at` function with the following arguments: * `location`: the location of the error * ` `: two string literals that will be used as part of the error message * `actual`: the actual value of the argument * `arg" GCC,riscv,206,"The next statement of this code snippet is: return type == RVV_BASE_eew8_index || type == RVV_BASE_eew16_index || type == RVV_BASE_eew32_index || type == RVV_BASE_eew64_index || type == RVV_BASE_float_vector || type == RVV_BASE_double_trunc_float_vector || type == RVV_BASE_double_trunc_vector || type == RVV_BASE_widen_l" GCC,riscv,207,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `if (tree_fits_uhwi_p(arg) && (min <= tree_to_uhwi(arg)) && (tree_to_uhwi(arg) <= max)) {`" GCC,riscv,208,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `HOST_WIDE_INT value = tree_to_uhwi ( arg ) ;` This statement is assigning the value of the `arg` tree to a variable called `value` of type `HOST_WIDE_INT`. The `tree_to_uhwi` function is used to convert the `arg` tree to an unsigned integer value." GCC,riscv,209,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return false;` This is because the `report_out_of_range` function is called with the `argno`, `actual`, `min`, and `max` arguments, which means that the value of `actual` is out of range. The `return false;` statement is then executed, which returns control to the caller of the function." GCC,riscv,210,"The next statement after the `if` block is the `return` statement. The `if` block checks if the `actual` value is within the range specified by `min` and `max`. If it is not, the `report_out_of_range` function is called and the function returns `false`. If the `actual` value is within the range, the function continues to the next statement, which is the `return` statement." GCC,riscv,211,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the function is dependent on the specific inputs and the implementation of the `machine_mode` and `function_checker` classes. However, based on the name of the function and the fact that it is declared as `inline`, it is likely that the next statement will be a return statement that returns a value of type `machine_mode`." GCC,riscv,212,"The next statement after the code snippet you provided is likely to be a return statement, as the code is returning a value. However, without more context, it is not possible to determine the exact value that will be returned. The code snippet you provided is using the `TYPE_MODE` macro to get the mode of the type of the function `fndecl`. The `TYPE_MODE` macro is defined in the GCC source code as follows: ``` #define TYPE_MODE(t) (t)->mode ``` So, the code is getting the mode of the type of the" GCC,riscv,213,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `this->base_type = base_type_in;` This statement is assigning the value of the `base_type_in` parameter to the `base_type` member variable of the `rvv_arg_type_info` class." GCC,riscv,214,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `this->base_type = base_type_in;` This statement is assigning the value of the `base_type_in` parameter to the `base_type` member variable of the `rvv_arg_type_info` class." GCC,riscv,215,"The next statement after the `memcpy` function call is likely to be a comparison or a logical operation, as the `memcpy` function is used to copy data from one location to another. Here are a few possibilities: 1. `if (memcmp(m_old_have_regs_of_mode, have_regs_of_mode, sizeof(have_regs_of_mode)) == 0)`: This statement checks if the data copied from `have_regs_of_mode` to `m_old_have_regs_of_" GCC,riscv,216,"The next statement after the `if` block would be the `return` statement, which returns `NULL_TREE` if the `type` is equal to `error_mark_node`." GCC,riscv,217,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be the assignment of the `comparison` variable, which is a result of the `gen_rtx_fmt_ee` function call. The function call takes the `rcode`, `mask_mode`, `op1`, and `op2` arguments, and returns a new RTX expression with the specified format and operands. The `comparison` variable is then used in the next statement, which is likely to be a call to the `emit_insn` function, which emits the instruction represented by the RTX expression to the assembly" GCC,riscv,218,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `add_mem_operand ( mode , use_real_mask_p ( pred ) ? : ) ;` This statement adds a memory operand to the current instruction, using the `add_mem_operand` function. The first argument to the function is the mode of the memory operand, which is determined by the `mode` variable. The second argument is a boolean value that indicates whether the mask should be used or not. If the mask should be used, the second argument" GCC,riscv,219,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be the continuation of the `if` statement that checks whether the function returns void or not. Specifically, it is likely to be the `else` branch of that `if` statement, which adds a `vundef` operand to the list of input operands if the function does not return void. Here's a more detailed breakdown of the code snippet: 1. `int arg_offset = ;`: This line initializes a variable `arg_offset` to a specific value, which is likely to" GCC,riscv,220,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `add_input_operand(Pmode, get_tail_policy_for_pred(pred));` This is because the `if` statement that checks `base->apply_tail_policy_p()` is true, and the `add_input_operand()` function is called with the `Pmode` and the result of `get_tail_policy_for_pred(pred)` as arguments." GCC,riscv,221,The next statement after `return true ;` would be the end of the function or method. GCC,riscv,222,"The next statement after the code snippet you provided is: return pred == PRED_TYPE_mu;" GCC,riscv,223,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `add_input_operand ( mode , vd ) ;` This is because the `if` statement that follows the `else` clause is not executed, so the `add_input_operand` function is called with the `mode` and `vd` arguments." GCC,riscv,224,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `add_input_operand(mode, vs2);`" GCC,riscv,225,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet without knowing the context and the purpose of the code. However, based on the code snippet provided, it appears to be related to generating an instruction for a computer processor. The code defines a function that takes two input operands, one of which is a predicate and the other is a value of type AVL_TYPE. The function then generates an instruction using the icode parameter, which is not defined in the code snippet provided. Without more information, it is not possible to determine the exact purpose of the code or the next statement that will be" GCC,riscv,226,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet without knowing the context and the definition of the `TYPE_MODE` and `builtin_types` variables. However, based on the syntax and the fact that the code is using the `.` operator to access a member of an object, it is likely that the next statement will be a call to a method or a property of the `TYPE_MODE` object, or a reference to a member of the `builtin_types` array." GCC,riscv,227,"The next statement in the code snippet is: `return TYPE_MODE (builtin_types[type.index].vector);` This statement is returning the `TYPE_MODE` of the `builtin_types[type.index].vector` object, which is a `vector` object. The `TYPE_MODE` function is used to get the mode (i.e., the type of the object) of the `vector` object. Therefore, the next statement in the code snippet is returning the mode of the `vector` object." GCC,riscv,228,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be the return statement, as it is the last statement in the function. Therefore, the next statement of this code snippet is: return;" GCC,riscv,229,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the code depends on the specific implementation of the `rvv_switcher` function and the input parameters passed to it. However, based on the name of the function and the fact that it is defined as a `STR_LIT`, it is likely that the function is used to switch between different string literals based on some condition. The next statement of the code snippet is likely to be a call to the `rvv_switcher` function, passing in the appropriate input parameters to determine which string literal" GCC,riscv,230,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return;` Explanation: The code snippet is a function that takes a `label_ref` structure as an argument and adds label notes to the insn that references the label. The function first asserts that the insn is not a jump insn, and then adds a label note to the insn. If the label is a label insn, the function increments the number of uses of the label. The function then loops through the operands of the insn and adds label notes to any operands that are label" GCC,riscv,231,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `EXECUTE_IF_SET_IN_BITMAP ( bitdata , , bb_index , sbi ) { if ( vector_exprs [ bb_index ] -> get_avl_info ( ) != avl ) return false ; }` This statement is a loop that iterates over the bits set in the `bitdata` bitmap, and for each bit that is set, it checks if the `avl_info` of the corresponding `vector_expr` is equal to the `av" GCC,riscv,232,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `EXECUTE_IF_SET_IN_BITMAP ( bitdata , , bb_index , sbi ) {` This line is part of a loop that iterates over the bits that are set in the `bitdata` bitmap. The loop body will be executed for each bit that is set in the bitmap. The loop will terminate when all bits have been processed." GCC,riscv,233,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return false;` Explanation: The code snippet is checking if there are any accesses to the destination register in the previous instructions in the same basic block. If there are any accesses, the function returns `false`. Otherwise, it continues to the next instruction." GCC,riscv,234,"The next statement after the `if` statement in the code snippet you provided is the `return` statement. The `if` statement checks whether the `index` of the `bb` object is equal to the `index` of the `set` object. If the condition is true, the `return` statement is executed, which returns `true` from the function. So, the next statement after the `if` statement is the `return` statement." GCC,riscv,235,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet without knowing the context and the purpose of the function. However, based on the name of the function `any_set_in_bb_p`, it appears to be checking if any of the sets in the `sets` hash set are present in the basic block `bb`. The function takes two arguments: `sets`, which is a hash set of `set_info` objects, and `bb`, which is a pointer to a `bb_info` object. The function iterates over the sets in the `sets` hash set and checks if" GCC,riscv,236,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `if (dest == NULL_RTX) {`" GCC,riscv,237,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific values of the variables and the behavior of the functions being called. However, based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the next statement after the `if` statement is the `find_access` function call. The `find_access` function is called with two arguments: `i->defs()` and `REGNO(dem.get_avl())`. The `i->defs()` expression is likely to be a list of definitions, and the `REGNO(dem.get_" GCC,riscv,238,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the implementation of the `vector_insn_info` class and the specific values of the `other` object. However, based on the name of the function and the fact that it is a member function of the `vector_insn_info` class, it is likely that the function checks whether the current object is available for use with the `other` object. The function may check for compatibility between the two objects, or it may check whether the current object is in a valid state to be" GCC,riscv,239,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `m_value = NULL_RTX;`" GCC,riscv,240,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `m_value = NULL_RTX;`" GCC,riscv,241,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific inputs and the behavior of the functions called. However, based on the code structure, it appears that the next statement will be the start of a new iteration of the loop, with the variable `e` being updated to the next element in the list. The loop continues until the end of the list is reached, at which point the function will return. The function appears to be searching for a specific element in the list, and once it is found, it will return the corresponding `block_info` structure." GCC,riscv,242,"The next statement of the code snippet is: `block_info.local_dem = block_info.reaching_out;`" GCC,riscv,243,"The next statement after the `else` block is: `gcc_assert ( block_info . reaching_out . unknown_p ( ) ) ;` This statement is an assertion that the `reaching_out` field of the `block_info` structure is unknown. If the assertion fails, it will trigger a runtime error." GCC,riscv,244,"The next statement of this code snippet is: return insn1->compare_with(insn2) < ;" GCC,riscv,245,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return LMUL_RESERVED;` This statement is executed if the `for` loop completes without finding a matching `vlmul` value. In this case, the function returns the reserved value `LMUL_RESERVED` to indicate that no matching `vlmul` value was found." GCC,riscv,246,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific values of `sew` and `ratio` that are passed to the function. However, based on the name of the function and the variables used, it appears that the function is calculating the value of the `vlmul` field in a vector instruction. The `vlmul` field is used to specify the multiplication factor for the vector operation, and it is typically a power of 2. Therefore, based on the code snippet, it is likely that the next statement of the function" GCC,riscv,247,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `if ( !m_vector_manager->all_same_ratio_p(m_vector_manager->vector_avin[cfg_bb->index]) ) return false;` This statement checks if all the elements in the vector `m_vector_manager->vector_avin[cfg_bb->index]` have the same ratio. If they do not, the function returns `false`." GCC,riscv,248,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `for (e = ei = cfg_bb->succ; ei != NULL; ei = ei->succ_next)` This line is initializing a loop that will iterate over all the successors of the basic block `cfg_bb`. The loop will continue until all the successors have been visited, or until the condition `all_valid_p` becomes false." GCC,riscv,249,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `remove_reg_equal_equiv_notes(rinsn);` This statement removes any register equal or equivalent notes that may have been added to the instruction `rinsn` during the previous steps of the optimization process." GCC,riscv,250,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `rinsn = insn->rtl();` This statement assigns the result of the `rtl()` method called on `insn` to the variable `rinsn`. The `rtl()` method is a member function of the `insn` object, and it returns a pointer to an `rtx_insn` object. The `rinsn` variable is then used in the subsequent `if` statement to check if the instruction is a vector configuration instruction." GCC,riscv,251,"This code snippet is part of a function that appears to be related to vectorization and optimization of code. It is difficult to determine the exact purpose of the code without more context, but based on the variable names and the structure of the code, it appears to be checking if a block of code is valid or dirty, and if it is, it is checking if it is an empty block. If it is an empty block, it is setting some properties of the block and returning true. If it is not an empty block, it is returning false. Here is a breakdown of the code: 1. `" GCC,riscv,252,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be the initialization of the `uses_builder` object, which is used to build a new `use_array` for the `insn` object. The `uses_builder` object is created with a capacity of `insn->num_uses() - ` elements, which suggests that the code is preparing to remove some of the uses of the `insn` object. The next statement is likely to be: ``` uses_builder.reserve(insn->num_uses() - ;` This is because the `switch` statement is checking the value of `vlmul2` and returning a value based on that value. In this case, if `vlmul2` is equal to `LMUL_F8`, the code will execute the statement `return ;`." GCC,riscv,258,"The next statement after the given code snippet is: `return true;` The code snippet is a part of a function that is checking for certain conditions to be true. The first three lines of the code are using the `gcc_assert` macro to check for conditions that must be true. If any of these conditions are false, the program will abort with an assertion failure. The fourth line of the code is checking if the `demand_p` function returns `DEMAND_AVL`. If it does not, the function will return `true`. Therefore, the next statement" GCC,riscv,259,"The next statement after the given code snippet will be: `return false;` The code checks if the demand is not available (using the `demand_p` function) and returns `true` if it is not. If the demand is available, it checks if the demand is non-zero (using the `demand_p` function with the `DEMAND_NONZERO_AVL` argument) and returns `true` if it is. If the demand is zero, it returns `false`." GCC,riscv,260,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `if ( m_sew == curr_info.get_sew() ) return true;` This statement checks if the `m_sew` field of the current `vector_insn_info` object is equal to the `sew` field of the `curr_info` object. If they are equal, the function returns `true`." GCC,riscv,261,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return compatible_avl_p(curr_info) && compatible_vtype_p(curr_info);` This statement is executed if the `demand_p` function returns `false` and the `m_sew` field of the current `info` object is equal to the `sew` field of the current `info` object. The `compatible_avl_p` and `compatible_vtype_p` functions are not defined in the code snippet you provided, so it is not possible to determine their" GCC,riscv,262,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return true;` This statement is executed if none of the previous `if` conditions are met, meaning that all the conditions in the `if` statements are false. Therefore, the function returns `true` to indicate that the two objects are equal." GCC,riscv,263,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `if ( change . valid_p ( ) ) {`" GCC,riscv,264,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be: `if ( !optimize ) return;` This is because the `if` statement at the beginning of the code snippet checks whether the `optimize` variable is set to `false`, and if so, it returns immediately. The rest of the code in the snippet is only executed if `optimize` is set to `true`." GCC,riscv,265,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `for (const bb_info *bb : crtl->ssa->bbs()) {` This line is a `for` loop that iterates over the basic blocks in the control flow graph (CFG) of the program. The loop variable `bb` is a pointer to a `bb_info` structure, which contains information about the basic block. The loop body will be executed once for each basic block in the CFG." GCC,riscv,266,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be a loop that initializes the bitmaps in the vectors allocated in the previous statement. The code snippet allocates several vectors of bitmaps, each with the same number of elements as the number of basic blocks in the current function. The vectors are named `vector_antic`, `vector_transp`, `vector_comp`, `vector_avin`, `vector_avout`, and `vector_kill`. The `sbitmap_vector_alloc` function is used to allocate each vector, and the `bitmap_vector_ones` function is" GCC,riscv,267,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `bitmap_vector_clear (vector_antic, last_basic_block_for_fn (cfun));` This statement clears the `vector_antic` bitmap vector, which was allocated in the previous line of code. The `bitmap_vector_clear` function is used to set all the bits in the vector to 0." GCC,riscv,268,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the code depends on the specific inputs and the implementation of the `vector_insn_info` class. However, based on the name of the function and the parameter it takes, it is likely that the next statement will be related to the creation of an expression using the information stored in the `vector_insn_info` object. Without more context or information about the code, it is difficult to provide a more specific prediction. If you have any additional details or information about the code, I would be" GCC,riscv,269,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the program depends on the input and the specific implementation of the `info` and `dump` functions. However, based on the syntax and the fact that the `dump` function is being called with `stderr` as an argument, it is likely that the next statement will be a call to the `dump` function with `stderr` as an argument, followed by a semicolon to indicate the end of the statement." GCC,riscv,270,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the implementation of the `vector_infos_manager` class and the specific inputs that are passed to the `debug` function. However, based on the name of the function and the type of the `info` parameter, it is likely that the next statement will be a call to a method or function that is defined in the `vector_infos_manager` class, such as `print_info` or `get_info`." GCC,riscv,271,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the context in which the code is being executed. However, based on the information provided, it is likely that the next statement will be an assignment to the `m_demands` array, with the value `true` being assigned to the element at the index corresponding to the `type` variable." GCC,riscv,272,The next statement after the `if ( dump_file )` block is `return;`. GCC,riscv,273,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the program depends on the specific implementation of the `demand_p` function and the value of the `type` parameter. However, based on the name of the function and the parameter, it is likely that the function will return a boolean value indicating whether a demand of the specified type is present or not. The function may use the `type` parameter to determine which type of demand to check for. Without more information about the specific implementation of the `demand_p` function, it is" GCC,riscv,274,"The next statement after the code snippet you provided is likely to be a comparison of the values returned by the `get_vlmul()` methods of `info1` and `info2`. Here's a breakdown of the code: * `info1` and `info2` are two objects of some class that has a `get_vlmul()` method. * The `get_vlmul()` method returns a value that represents the value of the VLmul field in the object. * The code compares the values returned by the `get_vlmul()` methods of `info" GCC,riscv,275,"The next statement after the code snippet you provided is: return info1.get_ma() != info2.get_ma();" GCC,riscv,276,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the function `different_ratio_p` is not specified. However, based on the name of the function and the parameters it takes, it is likely that the function compares the ratios of two vectors and returns `true` if the ratios are different and `false` otherwise. Here is a possible implementation of the function: ``` static bool different_ratio_p ( const vector_insn_info & info1 , const vector_insn_info & info" GCC,riscv,277,"The next statement after the code snippet you provided is: return info1.get_sew() != info2.get_sew();" GCC,riscv,278,The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be a closing brace `}` to end the `different_tail_policy_p` function. GCC,riscv,279,"The next statement after the `return` statement in the code snippet you provided is the end of the function. The function will return a value of `true` if `m_state` is equal to `DIRTY` or `DIRTY_WITH_KILLED_AVL`, and a value of `false` otherwise." GCC,riscv,280,"The next statement after the `return` statement in the code snippet you provided is the end of the function. The function will return a value of `true` if `m_state` is equal to `DIRTY` or `DIRTY_WITH_KILLED_AVL`, and a value of `false` otherwise." GCC,riscv,281,"The next statement after the code snippet you provided is: `m_vector_manager->release();`. This statement is a member function call on the `m_vector_manager` object, which is a pointer to a `VectorManager` object. The `release()` function is called to release any resources held by the `VectorManager` object, such as memory or file handles. After the `release()` function is called, the `m_vector_manager` pointer is set to `nullptr` to indicate that the object has been released and should not be used anymore." GCC,riscv,282,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return ( ( pair . match_cond_p ( info1 . get_demands ( ) , info2 . get_demands ( ) ) && incompatible_p ( info1 , info2 ) ) || ( pair . match_cond_p ( info2 . get_demands ( ) , info1 . get_demands ( ) ) && incompatible_p ( info2 , info1 ) ) ) ;` This statement is a return statement that returns a boolean value indicating whether the given pair of `info` objects is compatible" GCC,riscv,283,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return ( ( pair . match_cond_p ( info1 . get_demands ( ) , info2 . get_demands ( ) ) && incompatible_p ( info1 , info2 ) ) || ( pair . match_cond_p ( info2 . get_demands ( ) , info1 . get_demands ( ) ) && incompatible_p ( info2 , info1 ) ) ) ;` This statement is a return statement that returns a boolean value indicating whether the two vector instructions are incompatible. The return" GCC,riscv,284,"The next statement after the given code snippet is: fprintf ( file , ) ; This is because the code snippet ends with a call to fprintf, and the next statement after the call is the one that prints the closing brace for the FOR_ALL_BB_FN loop." GCC,riscv,285,"The next statement after the `fprintf` call is `print_rtl_single ( dump_file , rinsn ) ;`." GCC,riscv,286,"Based on the code snippet provided, it is difficult to predict the next statement with certainty. However, based on the context and the structure of the code, it is likely that the next statement will be related to the `vector_insn_info` object and its properties. The code snippet is part of a function that appears to be processing a vector instruction and its associated metadata. The function is using the `vector_insn_info` object to store information about the instruction and its operands, and is checking for certain conditions and performing operations based on that information. Based on the structure of" GCC,riscv,287,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `emit_insn_after(pat, rinsn);` This is because the `else` clause of the `if` statement is executed when `emit_type` is not equal to `EMIT_DIRECT` or `EMIT_BEFORE`. In this case, the `emit_insn_after` function is called with the `pat` and `rinsn` arguments." GCC,riscv,288,"The next statement after `fprintf ( dump_file , ) ; print_rtl_single ( dump_file , pat ) ;` is `if ( emit_type == EMIT_DIRECT )`." GCC,riscv,289,"The next statement of this code snippet is: return m_state == EMPTY || m_state == HARD_EMPTY;" GCC,riscv,290,The next statement after the `if` block is `init()`. GCC,riscv,291,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the value of `count` is not known. However, based on the code snippet, it appears that `count` is being used as a counter to keep track of the number of elements in an array or other data structure. Therefore, the next statement of this code snippet could be any of the following: * `count++;` to increment the counter by 1 * `count--;` to decrement the counter by 1 * `count = 0;` to reset the counter to 0" GCC,riscv,292,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `hash_set sets = get_all_sets(set, true, false, true);` This line of code creates a new `hash_set` object called `sets` and initializes it with the result of the `get_all_sets` function, which is called with the `set` object as an argument, along with three boolean values: `true`, `false`, and `true`. The `get_all_sets` function is not defined in the code snippet you provided, so it is not possible" GCC,riscv,293,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return insn;` This is because the `if` statement checks if the `find_access` function returns a non-null value for the `insn->defs()` list and the `REGNO(x)` register. If the `find_access` function returns a non-null value, the `if` statement is executed and the `return insn;` statement is executed, which returns the `insn` pointer. If the `if` statement is not executed, the `return nullptr;` statement is executed, which returns" GCC,riscv,294,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return nullptr;` Explanation: The `find_reg_killed_by` function takes two arguments: a `bb_info` object and an `rtx` object. It checks if the `rtx` object is a register by calling the `REG_P` macro. If it is not a register, the function returns `nullptr`. If the `rtx` object is a register, the function iterates over the instructions in the basic block in reverse order using the `reverse_real_nondebug" GCC,riscv,295,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return info1.get_ratio();` This statement returns the ratio of the first vector instruction (`info1`) to the second vector instruction (`info2`). The `get_ratio()` method is called on `info1` to retrieve the ratio, which is then returned as the result of the `first_ratio()` function." GCC,riscv,296,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the implementation of the `get_vlmul` method and the state of the `info1` object. However, based on the syntax and the fact that the method is called on the `info1` object, it is likely that the next statement will be the result of the `get_vlmul` method, which is likely to return a value related to the multiplication of two values." GCC,riscv,297,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific input data and the behavior of the functions called in the code. However, based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the next statement will be the start of a loop that iterates over the successors of a basic block in a control flow graph. The loop will iterate over the successors of the basic block pointed to by `cfg_bb`, and for each successor, it will check if the successor is the exit block of the function, and if so, it will continue to the next successor." GCC,riscv,298,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet without knowing the context and the specific implementation of the `vector_insn_infos` method. However, based on the code snippet you provided, it appears that the `info` variable is being assigned the value of the `vector_insn_infos` method, which is likely a vector of some kind. Given that the `INSN_UID` method is being used to retrieve the UID of the instruction, it is possible that the `vector_insn_infos` method is returning a vector of instruction information objects," GCC,riscv,299,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `rinsn = PREV_INSN (insn->rtl());` This statement is assigning the previous instruction of the current instruction `insn` to the variable `rinsn`. The `PREV_INSN` macro is used to get the previous instruction, and it takes the current instruction as an argument." GCC,riscv,300,"Based on the code snippet you provided, it appears to be related to the management of vectors in a compiler. However, the exact purpose of the code is not clear without more context. The code appears to be iterating over the basic blocks in a control flow graph (CFG) and performing some operations on the vectors associated with each block. The `m_vector_manager` variable appears to be an instance of a class that manages the vectors, and the `vector_block_infos` field is a vector of information about the vectors for each basic block. The code is checking whether the number" GCC,riscv,301,"The next statement after the given code snippet would be: `return;` This is because the code snippet is setting various variables to `nullptr` and then returning from the function. The `return` statement is used to return control to the calling function, and it is typically the last statement in a function." GCC,riscv,302,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `set_avl_info(info2.get_avl_info());` This statement sets the AVL information of the current object to the AVL information of `info2`." GCC,riscv,303,"The next statement of the code snippet is: `set_avl_info(info1.get_avl_info());` This statement sets the AVL information of the current object to the AVL information of `info1`." GCC,riscv,304,"Based on the code snippet you provided, it appears that the `else if` statement is checking if the `info2` object has a demand policy set. If it does, then the `set_ma` function is called with the result of `info2.get_ma()` as an argument, and then the `demand` function is called with the `DEMAND_MASK_POLICY` constant as an argument. Therefore, the next statement after the `else if` block would be the `demand` function call with the `DEMAND_MASK_P" GCC,riscv,305,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific values of the variables and the behavior of the functions being called. However, based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the next statement will be: `set_demand(DEMAND_SEW, rule.demand_sew_p);` This is because the `if` statement checks the result of `rule.pair.match_cond_p(info2.get_demands(), info1.get_demands())`, and if that result is true," GCC,riscv,306,"Based on the code snippet provided, it is difficult to predict the next statement with certainty. However, based on the context and the syntax of the code, it is likely that the next statement will be a call to the `demand` function with the `DEMAND_TAIL_POLICY` argument. The code snippet is checking if the `info1` object has a demand policy of `DEMAND_TAIL_POLICY` using the `demand_p` function. If the demand policy is `DEMAND_TAIL_POLICY`," GCC,riscv,307,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `gate` function and the value of the `TARGET_VECTOR` constant. However, based on the code snippet provided, it is likely that the next statement after the `return TARGET_VECTOR` statement will be the end of the `gate` function, as there are no more statements in the function body after the `return` statement. Therefore, the next statement after the `return TARGET_VECTOR` statement is" GCC,riscv,308,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return new_pat;` This is the last statement in the function, so it will be executed after the `if` statement and the `else if` statement have been evaluated. The function will return the value of `new_pat`, which is a `rtx` object that represents a pattern for a VSETVL instruction." GCC,riscv,309,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `new_pat = gen_vsetvl_pat ( VSETVL_NORMAL , new_info , dest ) ;` This is because the `if` statement checks if `vsetvl_insn_p ( rinsn ) || vlmax_avl_p ( info . get_avl ( ) )` is true, and if it is, it sets `new_pat` to the result of `gen_vsetvl_pat ( VSETVL_NORMAL , new_" GCC,riscv,310,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be a call to the `push_back()` method of the `available_list` object, which is an instance of the `auto_vec` class. The `push_back()` method adds an element to the end of the vector. Here is an example of what the next statement might look like: ``` available_list.push_back(some_value); ``` This statement adds the value `some_value` to the end of the `available_list` vector." GCC,riscv,311,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be a call to the `push_back()` method of the `available_list` object, which is an instance of the `auto_vec` class. The `push_back()` method adds an element to the end of the vector. Here is an example of what the next statement might look like: ``` available_list.push_back(some_value); ``` This statement adds the value `some_value` to the end of the `available_list` vector." GCC,riscv,312,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `e = ei.next();`" GCC,riscv,313,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `basic_block bb = work_list.pop();`" GCC,riscv,314,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `hash_set all_sets = new hash_set();` This statement creates a new `hash_set` object called `all_sets` and initializes it with an empty set of `set_info*` elements. The `hash_set` class is a hash table implementation that provides fast lookups and insertions of elements. In this case, the `hash_set` is being used to store a set of `set_info*` objects, which are pointers to `set_info" GCC,riscv,315,"The next statement after `return m_avl.get_value()` would be the next line of code after the `return` statement. Without seeing the rest of the code, it's impossible to know for sure what that statement would be. However, based on the context of the code snippet you provided, it's likely that the next statement would be the end of the function or method that contains the `return` statement." GCC,riscv,316,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the code depends on the specific implementation of the `avl_info` class and the `get_avl_info` function. However, based on the name of the function and the return type, it is likely that the function returns a reference to an object of type `avl_info`." GCC,riscv,317,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be the return statement, which returns the value of the `gen_rtx_REG` function. The `gen_rtx_REG` function is a function that generates a register operand for a RTL expression, and it takes two arguments: the first is the mode of the register, and the second is the register number. In this code snippet, the `Pmode` variable is being used as the mode of the register, and the `get_avl_source()` function is being used to get the register number. The `->` operator" GCC,riscv,318,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the implementation of the `get_source()` method and the state of the `m_avl` object. However, based on the name of the method and the fact that it is being called on an `m_avl` object, it is likely that the next statement will retrieve the source of the `m_avl` object, which could be a file, a network connection, or some other data source." GCC,riscv,319,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `const insn_info * i = insn->prev_nondebug_insn();` This line of code is assigning the `prev_nondebug_insn` field of the `insn` object to the `i` variable, which is a pointer to a `const insn_info` object. The `prev_nondebug_insn` field is a pointer to the previous instruction in the same basic block as the current instruction. The `real_insn_and_same_bb_p` function is then called with" GCC,riscv,320,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `if ( vlmax_avl_p ( prop . get_avl ( ) ) ) {`" GCC,riscv,321,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return (bool) (get_prefer_mask_policy() & || (get_prefer_mask_policy() >> & ));` This statement is a return statement that returns a boolean value based on the result of a bitwise AND operation. The operation is performed on the result of the `get_prefer_mask_policy()` function, which is called twice in the statement. The first call returns a value that is then bitwise ANDed with" GCC,riscv,322,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the program depends on various factors such as the input data, the environment in which the program is running, and the specific implementation of the `get_default_ta` function. However, based on the name of the function and the fact that it is declared as `static`, it is likely that this function is used to retrieve the default value of a type attribute (TA) for a particular object or class. The function may use a combination of hard-coded values and runtime information to determine the default value, and" GCC,riscv,323,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the context in which the code is being executed. However, based on the syntax and the fact that the `m_demands` variable is being returned, it is likely that the next statement will be a statement that uses the value returned by this function." GCC,riscv,324,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the context in which the function is called and the values of the variables involved. However, based on the code snippet provided, it is likely that the function will return a pointer to an array of `bool` values, which is stored in the `m_demands` member variable." GCC,riscv,325,"The next statement of this code snippet is: return ;" GCC,riscv,326,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `i = i->next_nondebug_insn()` This is because the `for` loop is iterating over the instructions in the basic block, and the `next_nondebug_insn()` method is being used to get the next instruction in the basic block that is not a debug instruction. The `real_insn_and_same_bb_p()` function is being used to check if the instruction is real (i.e., not a debug instruction) and is in the same basic block as the current instruction. If the instruction" GCC,riscv,327,"The code snippet you provided is a C++ code snippet, and it is difficult to predict the next statement without knowing the context and the purpose of the code. However, based on the code snippet you provided, it appears to be a part of a function that is searching for a specific instruction in a basic block. The function takes an `insn` parameter, which is a pointer to a `bb_info` structure, and it uses the `next_nondebug_insn` function to iterate over the instructions in the basic block. The function checks each instruction to see if it is a `real_ins" GCC,riscv,328,"The next statement of this code snippet is: return vector_insn_info::get_hard_empty();" GCC,riscv,329,"The next statement of this code snippet is: return vector_insn_info::get_hard_empty();" GCC,riscv,330,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the context in which the code is being executed. However, based on the syntax and the fact that the `m_insn` variable is being returned, it is likely that the next statement will be a statement that uses the value returned by this function." GCC,riscv,331,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be: return m_insn; This is because the function `get_insn()` is declared to return a pointer to an `insn_info` structure, and the variable `m_insn` is a member of that structure. The function is returning the value of `m_insn`, which is a pointer to an `insn_info` structure." GCC,riscv,332,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the code depends on the specific implementation of the `get_ma()` function. However, based on the name of the function and the fact that it is declared as a `const` member function, it is likely that the function returns a value of type `bool` that indicates whether the object has a valid value for the `ma` field." GCC,riscv,333,The next statement after `return m_ratio;` would be the end of the function. GCC,riscv,334,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the `get_ratio` function is not specified. However, based on the name of the function and the return type, it is likely that the function returns a value that represents a ratio or a fraction. Without more information about the context in which the code is being used, it is not possible to provide a more specific prediction about the next statement." GCC,riscv,335,"The next statement after the `for` loop will be `return nullptr;`. The `for` loop will iterate over the `sets` vector and check if the `bb` field of each `set_info` struct is equal to the `cfg_bb` variable. If a match is found, the function will return the `set` struct. If no match is found, the function will return `nullptr`. Therefore, the next statement after the `for` loop will be `return nullptr;`, which will be executed if no match is found in the `sets` vector." GCC,riscv,336,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return set;` Explanation: The code is iterating over the `sets` hash set, and for each `set_info` object in the set, it is checking if the `bb` field of the `set` object is equal to the `cfg_bb` parameter. If a match is found, the `set` object is returned. If no match is found, `nullptr` is returned. So, the next statement of this code snippet is to return the `set` object if a match is found," GCC,riscv,337,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the context in which the function is called and the values of the variables involved. However, based on the code snippet provided, it is likely that the next statement will be: return m_sew; This is because the function is defined as returning a value of type uint8_t, and the only statement in the function body is a return statement that returns the value of the m_sew member variable." GCC,riscv,338,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the context in which the function is called and the values of the variables involved. However, based on the code snippet provided, it is likely that the next statement will be: return m_sew; This is because the function is defined as returning a value of type uint8_t, and the only statement in the function body is a return statement that returns the value of the m_sew member variable." GCC,riscv,339,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the context in which the code is being executed. However, based on the syntax and the fact that the `m_source` variable is being returned, it is likely that the next statement will be a statement that uses the value returned by this function." GCC,riscv,340,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the program depends on the specific implementation of the `get_ta` function and the state of the object that the function is called on. However, based on the name of the function and the fact that it is a `const` member function, it is likely that the function returns a `bool` value indicating whether the object has a valid `ta` value. The next statement of the code snippet would likely be a call to this function, such as: ``` bool has_ta = get_ta" GCC,riscv,341,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the context in which the code is being executed. However, based on the syntax and the fact that the code is returning a value, it is likely that the next statement will be the end of the function or method that this code is a part of." GCC,riscv,342,"The next statement after the code snippet you provided is: `info.set_unknown();` This statement sets the `unknown` property of the `info` object to `true`." GCC,riscv,343,"The next statement of this code snippet is: return m_value;" GCC,riscv,344,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet without knowing the context and the definition of the functions and variables used. However, based on the syntax and the fact that the code is returning a value, it is likely that the next statement will be a return statement or a statement that assigns a value to a variable." GCC,riscv,345,The next statement after `return m_vlmul;` would be the end of the function. GCC,riscv,346,The next statement after `return m_vlmul;` would be the end of the function. GCC,riscv,347,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be a call to the `get_attr_ratio` function, which is used to retrieve the ratio attribute of the instruction. The `get_attr_ratio` function takes an `rtl` object as an argument, and returns the ratio attribute of the instruction. Here is the code snippet with the next statement added: ``` else set = nullptr ; } uint8_t sew = get_sew ( insn -> rtl ( ) ) ; enum vlmul_type vlmul = get_vlmul ( ins" GCC,riscv,348,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return true;` Explanation: The `if` statement checks if `info2` has a demand ratio and if it has a demand for the GE SEW. If both conditions are true, it returns the result of the comparison between the SEW of `info1` and `info2`. If either of the conditions is false, it returns `true`. So, if `info2` does not have a demand ratio or does not have a demand for the GE SEW, the function will return `true`." GCC,riscv,349,"The next statement after the `if` block is the `return true` statement. The `if` block checks if `info2` does not demand `DEMAND_LMUL` and `info2` demands `DEMAND_GE_SEW`. If this condition is true, the `if` block returns the result of the comparison `info1.get_sew() < info2.get_sew()`. If the `if` block is not executed, the `return true` statement is executed, which means that the function returns `true`." GCC,riscv,350,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return true;` Explanation: The `if` statement checks if `info2` does not demand `DEMAND_LMUL` and does demand `DEMAND_GE_SEW`. If this is the case, the function returns `info1.get_sew() < info2.get_sew()`. If `info2` does not meet these conditions, the function returns `true`. Therefore, the next statement of the code snippet is `return true;`." GCC,riscv,351,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return info1.get_sew() < info2.get_sew();` This statement is executed if the following conditions are met: * `info2.demand_p(DEMAND_LMUL)` is false * `info2.demand_p(DEMAND_RATIO)` is false * `info2.demand_p(DEMAND_GE_SEW)` is true In this case, the function `ge_sew_unavailable_p` returns" GCC,riscv,352,"The next statement after the `return` statement in the code snippet you provided is the end of the function. The `return` statement is used to return a value from a function, and in this case, it is returning the maximum of the two values returned by the `get_sew()` methods of the `info1` and `info2` objects. Therefore, the next statement after the `return` statement would be the end of the function, which is indicated by the closing curly brace `}`." GCC,riscv,353,"The next statement after the `return` statement in the code snippet you provided is the end of the function. The `return` statement is used to return a value from a function, and in this case, it is returning the maximum of the two values returned by the `get_sew()` methods of the `info1` and `info2` objects. Therefore, the next statement after the `return` statement would be the end of the function, which is indicated by the closing curly brace `}`." GCC,riscv,354,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the implementation of the `m_state` variable and the `HARD_EMPTY` constant. However, based on the name of the function `hard_empty_p`, it is likely that the function returns a boolean value indicating whether the state of the object is ""hard empty"". In this case, the next statement of the code snippet would be the return statement, which returns the value of the `m_state` variable compared to the `HARD_EMPTY` constant." GCC,riscv,355,"The next statement after `return m_avl.has_avl_imm();` would be the statement that follows the `if` block. Since there is no statement after the `if` block, the function would return `void`." GCC,riscv,356,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the code depends on the specific implementation of the `has_avl_imm` function. However, based on the name of the function and the fact that it is a member function of a class, it is likely that the function checks whether the class has an AVL immutable (i.e., a constant) value. Therefore, the next statement of this code snippet could be any of the following: * A check to see if the class has an AVL immutable value. *" GCC,riscv,357,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the program depends on the specific implementation of the `has_avl_no_reg` function and the state of the object on which the function is called. However, based on the name of the function and the fact that it is a member function of a class, it is likely that the function returns a boolean value indicating whether the object has an AVL (Advanced Vector Layout) register or not. Therefore, the next statement of this code snippet could be any statement that uses the return value" GCC,riscv,358,The next statement after the `return` statement in the code snippet is the `has_avl_no_reg()` function call. This function is called on the `m_avl` object and returns a boolean value indicating whether the AVL tree has any nodes with the specified registration number. GCC,riscv,359,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the implementation of the `has_avl_reg` method and the state of the `m_avl` object. However, based on the name of the method and the context in which it is being called, it is likely that the next statement will be a check of the return value of the `has_avl_reg` method, which will determine whether the `m_avl` object has an AVL registration or not." GCC,riscv,360,"The code snippet is a function that checks if a basic block in a control flow graph (CFG) contains a non-debug instruction with a specific operation. The function takes two arguments: `cfg_bb`, which is a basic block in the CFG, and `fn`, which is a function that is not used in the code snippet. The function first iterates over all the instructions in the basic block using the `FOR_BB_INSNS` macro. For each instruction, it checks if the instruction is not a debug instruction using the `NONDEBUG_INSN_P` macro. If" GCC,riscv,361,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return true;` Explanation: The code snippet is a part of a function that checks if a basic block in a control flow graph (CFG) contains a non-debug instruction with a specific operand type. The function uses the `FOR_ALL_BB_FN` and `FOR_BB_INSNS` macros to iterate over all basic blocks and instructions in the CFG, respectively. Inside the loop, the function checks if the current instruction is a non-debug instruction using the `NONDEBUG" GCC,riscv,362,"The next statement after the code snippet you provided is: `return get_attr_has_vl_op ( rinsn ) ;` This statement is a return statement that returns the result of the `get_attr_has_vl_op` function, which is called with the `rinsn` argument. The `get_attr_has_vl_op` function is not defined in the code snippet you provided, so it is not possible to determine what it does or what its return value represents." GCC,riscv,363,"The code snippet you provided is a C++ function that appears to be part of a compiler's optimization pass. The function takes two arguments: a `bb_info` object and a `vector_insn_info` object. It checks if the `vector_insn_info` object is dirty with killed AVL (whatever that means) and if the AVL is a `vlmax_avl_p` (whatever that means). If the AVL is a `vlmax_avl_p`, it returns the result of calling the `find_reg_killed_by`" GCC,riscv,364,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific inputs and the behavior of the functions being called. However, based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the next statement will be: `return false;` This is because the `compatible_avl_p` function is called with the `avl_info` of the new `REG` RTX, and if this function returns `false`, the `return false;` statement will be executed." GCC,riscv,365,"The next statement after the code snippet you provided is: `return get_attr_has_vtype_op ( rinsn ) ;` This statement is a return statement that returns the result of the `get_attr_has_vtype_op` function, which is called with the `rinsn` argument. The `get_attr_has_vtype_op` function is not defined in the code snippet you provided, so it is not possible to determine what it does or what it returns." GCC,riscv,366,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the `has_vtype_op` function depends on the specific implementation of the function and the input it is given. However, based on the name of the function and the context in which it is being called, it is likely that the function is checking whether the instruction represented by `rinsn` has a specific type of operand. The function may be returning a boolean value indicating whether or not the instruction has the desired type of operand. Without more information about the specific implementation of the" GCC,riscv,367,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return get_attr_type ( rinsn ) == TYPE_VIMOVVX || get_attr_type ( rinsn ) == TYPE_VFMOVVF || get_attr_type ( rinsn ) == TYPE_VIMOVXV || get_attr_type ( rinsn ) == TYPE_VFMOVFV;` This statement is a return statement that returns a boolean value indicating whether the instruction is a vector move instruction or a vector floating-point move instruction. The `get_attr_" GCC,riscv,368,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet without knowing the specific implementation of the `ignore_vlmul_insn_p` function. However, based on the name of the function and the fact that it takes an `rtx_insn` parameter, it is likely that the next statement will be a check to determine whether the instruction represented by `rinsn` should be ignored or not. Without more information, it is not possible to provide a more specific answer. If you have access to the implementation of the `ignore_vlmul_insn_p` function, you" GCC,riscv,369,"The next statement in this code snippet is: fprintf(dump_file, ); This is because the previous statement, `m_vector_manager->dump(dump_file);`, is a method call that does not return a value, so the next statement in the code snippet is the next line of code, which is the `fprintf` statement." GCC,riscv,370,"Based on the code snippet you provided, it appears that the next statement will be: `pat = NEXT_INSN ( pat ) ;` This is because the `while` loop is currently iterating over the instructions in the basic block, and the next instruction to be processed is the one after `pat`." GCC,riscv,371,"Based on the code snippet you provided, it appears that the next statement will be: `new_insn = emit_insn_after_noloc ( pat , end_rinsn , cfg_bb ) ;` This is because the `if` statement that precedes this line checks whether `end_rinsn` is a jump or a call, and if it is, it emits the `pat` pattern before `end_rinsn`. If `end_rinsn` is not a jump or a call, it emits the `pat` pattern" GCC,riscv,372,"The next statement after the given code snippet is: `return false;` The code snippet is checking if the current instruction is a real instruction and if the `types` variable has the `REAL_SET` bit set. If both conditions are true, it returns `true`. Otherwise, it checks if the current instruction is a phi instruction and if the `types` variable has the `PHI_SET` bit set. If both conditions are true, it returns `true`. If neither condition is true, it returns `false`." GCC,riscv,373,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return false;` Explanation: The function `insn_should_be_added_p` checks if an instruction should be added to a set of instructions based on its type and the types of instructions that are allowed in the set. The function takes two arguments: `insn`, which is a pointer to an `insn_info` structure that contains information about the instruction, and `types`, which is a bitmask of the types of instructions that are allowed in the set. The function first checks if the instruction is real" GCC,riscv,374,"The next statement in the code snippet is: `for (const bb_info *bb : crtl->ssa->bbs()) compute_local_backward_infos(bb);` This is a loop that iterates over the basic blocks in the control flow graph of the program, and for each basic block, it computes the local backward information. The `compute_local_backward_infos` function is called with the basic block as an argument, and it is responsible for computing the local backward information for that basic block." GCC,riscv,375,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return true;`" GCC,riscv,376,"The next statement after the `if` block is the `return` statement. The `if` block is executed if the following conditions are true: * `info1.get_vlmul()` is equal to `info2.get_vlmul()` * `info2.demand_p(DEMAND_SEW)` is false * `info2.demand_p(DEMAND_RATIO)` is false If these conditions are true, the function returns `false`." GCC,riscv,377,"The next statement after the `FOR_EACH_EDGE` loop is `return true;`. The `FOR_EACH_EDGE` loop iterates over the successors of the current basic block (`cfg_bb`) and checks if the destination of each edge is the same as the current basic block. If it finds a matching edge, it returns `true`. If it reaches the end of the loop without finding a matching edge, it returns `false`." GCC,riscv,378,"The next statement after the code snippet you provided is: return new pass_vsetvl ( ctxt ) ; This statement creates a new instance of the pass_vsetvl class and returns it as the result of the make_pass_vsetvl function. The pass_vsetvl class is a subclass of the rtl_opt_pass class, which is the base class for all optimization passes in the GCC compiler. The make_pass_vsetvl function is a factory function that creates a new instance of the pass_vsetvl class and returns it as the result of the" GCC,riscv,379,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return ma == INVALID_ATTRIBUTE ? get_default_ma ( ) : IS_AGNOSTIC ( ma ) ;` This statement is a ternary operator, which is a shorthand for an if-else statement. The condition `ma == INVALID_ATTRIBUTE` is evaluated, and if it is true, the expression `get_default_ma ( )` is evaluated and returned. If the condition is false, the expression `IS_AGNOSTIC ( ma )` is evaluated" GCC,riscv,380,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `int mb = get_attr_mb ( rinsn ) ;`" GCC,riscv,381,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `if (dems1[i] != dems2[i]) return false;` This is because the `for` loop is iterating over the `NUM_LIT` elements of the `dems1` and `dems2` arrays, and the `if` statement is checking whether the corresponding elements of the two arrays are equal. If they are not equal, the function returns `false`." GCC,riscv,382,"The next statement after `return m_source == other.get_source();` would be the end of the function, as there are no more statements to execute." GCC,riscv,383,"The next statement after the `if` block will be the `return` statement. The `if` block checks whether the current `vl_vtype_info` object is valid, unknown, or uninitialized. If any of these conditions are true, the function returns `true`. If the current `vl_vtype_info` object is valid and compatible with the `require` object, the function returns `false`. Otherwise, the function returns `true`." GCC,riscv,384,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return false;` Explanation: The `pass_vsetvl` function is checking if the current instruction information (`curr_info`) is valid, unknown, or uninitialized. If any of these conditions are true, the function returns `true`. Otherwise, it returns `false`. The code snippet you provided only checks the first condition, which is that `curr_info` is valid. If this condition is not met, the function returns `true`. If the condition is met, the function proceeds to check the next condition" GCC,riscv,385,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `if ( ! m_avl . get_source ( ) -> insn ( ) -> is_real ( ) && ! m_avl . get_source ( ) -> insn ( ) -> is_phi ( ) ) return ;`" GCC,riscv,386,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `m_demands[DEMAND_SEW] = true;`" GCC,riscv,387,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `pass_vsetvl ( ctxt ) : rtl_opt_pass ( pass_data_vsetvl , ctxt ) {` This is a constructor for the `pass_vsetvl` class, which inherits from the `rtl_opt_pass` class. The constructor initializes the `pass_data_vsetvl` field of the `rtl_opt_pass` class with the `pass_data_vsetvl` object that is passed as an argument to the constructor." GCC,riscv,388,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `pass_vsetvl ( ctxt ) : rtl_opt_pass ( pass_data_vsetvl , ctxt ) {` This is a constructor for the `pass_vsetvl` class, which inherits from the `rtl_opt_pass` class. The constructor initializes the `pass_data_vsetvl` field of the `rtl_opt_pass` class with the `pass_data_vsetvl` object that is passed as an argument to the constructor." GCC,riscv,389,"The next statement after the code snippet you provided is: `return !info1.has_non_zero_avl() || !info2.has_non_zero_avl();` This statement is a logical OR operation that returns `true` if either `info1` or `info2` has a non-zero AVL (Adjusted Value Line) balance, and `false` otherwise." GCC,riscv,390,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the functions being called and the data being processed. However, based on the function names and the context of the code, it is likely that the next statement will be a call to `compute_global_properties()`, which will compute the global properties of the vector lattice." GCC,riscv,391,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific input and the behavior of the functions called. However, based on the code snippet, it appears that the next statement will be: `if ( vlmax_avl_p ( avl ) ) continue ;` This statement checks if the `avl` variable is a valid vector length, and if it is not, the code will continue to the next iteration of the loop. If `avl` is a valid vector length, the code will proceed to the next statement, which is:" GCC,riscv,392,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return info1.demand_p(DEMAND_AVL) && !info1.demand_p(DEMAND_NONZERO_AVL) && info1.has_avl_reg();`" GCC,riscv,393,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be: `fprintf (dump_file, ""Local DEM: ""); m_vector_manager->print_expr (m_vector_manager->vector_block_infos[bb->index()].local_dem); fprintf (dump_file, ""Reaching out: ""); m_vector_manager->print_expr (m_vector_manager->vector_block_infos[bb->index()].reaching_out); fprintf (dump_file, ""\n"");` This is based on the fact that the" GCC,riscv,394,"The next statement after the `return` statement in the code snippet is the end of the function. The function is returning the result of the `calculate_ratio` function, which is calculated using the `get_sew` and `get_vlmul` functions of the `info2` and `info1` objects, respectively." GCC,riscv,395,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return recog_memoized ( rinsn ) >= && get_attr_type ( rinsn ) == TYPE_RDVL;` This statement is a return statement that returns a boolean value indicating whether the instruction is a valid VL instruction. The `recog_memoized` function is used to check if the instruction has been recognized before, and the `get_attr_type` function is used to check the type of the instruction. If the instruction has been recognized and its type is" GCC,riscv,396,"The next statement of this code snippet is: return insn->bb == bb;" GCC,riscv,397,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `m_vector_manager->to_refine_vsetvls.add(rinsn);` This statement adds the `rtx_insn` object `rinsn` to the `to_refine_vsetvls` list of the `m_vector_manager` object." GCC,riscv,398,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `rinsn = PREV_INSN ( rinsn ) ;` This statement assigns the previous instruction to the variable `rinsn`." GCC,riscv,399,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `if (def_insn && def_insn->has_avl_reg() && !def_insn->get_avl_source()) return false;`" GCC,riscv,400,"The next statement after the given code snippet is likely to be the call to the `free_bitmap_vectors` function, which is called if the `optimize` variable is greater than a certain value (represented by ``)." GCC,riscv,401,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return;` The `release()` function is called on the `vector_insn_infos`, `vector_block_infos`, and `vector_exprs` objects, and then the `to_refine_vsetvls` and `to_delete_vsetvls` objects are checked to see if they are empty. If they are not empty, an assertion is triggered. Finally, the function returns." GCC,riscv,402,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return get_avl() == other.get_avl() && get_avl_source() == other.get_avl_source();` This statement is the body of the `same_avl_p` function, which is a member function of the `vl_vtype_info` class. It compares the `avl` and `avl_source` members of the current object with those of the `other` object, and returns `true` if they are equal." GCC,riscv,403,"The next statement of this code snippet is: return dems1[DEMAND_SEW] == dems2[DEMAND_SEW] && dems1[DEMAND_LMUL] == dems2[DEMAND_LMUL] && dems1[DEMAND_RATIO] == dems2[DEMAND_RATIO] && !dems1[DEMAND_GE_SEW] && !dems2[DEMAND_GE_SEW];" GCC,riscv,404,The next statement after the code snippet you provided is the end of the `operator==` function. GCC,riscv,405,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return get_sew() == other.get_sew() && get_vlmul() == other.get_vlmul() && get_ta() == other.get_ta() && get_ma() == other.get_ma();` This statement is a return statement that returns a boolean value indicating whether the current `vl_vtype_info` object is the same as the `other` object. The return value is determined by comparing the values of the `sew`, `vlmul`, `ta`, and `ma` members" GCC,riscv,406,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `vl_vtype_info` class and the values of the `other` object. However, based on the name of the function `same_vtype_p`, it is likely that the function is checking whether the `vl_vtype_info` object and the `other` object have the same type. If this is the case, the next statement of the code snippet would likely be a comparison of the types of the two objects, such as `if (this->" GCC,riscv,407,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be a comparison of the result of the `get_attr_type` function with the constant `TYPE_VIMOVXV` or `TYPE_VFMOVFV`. Here's a breakdown of the code: * `get_attr_type(rinsn)`: This function returns the type of the attribute `rinsn`. * `== TYPE_VIMOVXV`: This is a comparison of the result of the `get_attr_type` function with the constant `TYPE_VIMOVXV`." GCC,riscv,408,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the function `second_lmul_less_than_first_lmul_p` depends on the specific values of the `info1` and `info2` parameters, which are not provided in the code snippet. However, based on the function name and the types of the parameters, it can be inferred that the function is likely to be comparing the values of the `lmul` fields of the `vector_insn_info` structures pointed to by `info1` and `info2" GCC,riscv,409,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the function is dependent on the specific inputs and the implementation of the `vector_insn_info` class. However, based on the name of the function and the parameters it takes, it is likely that the function is intended to calculate the ratio of the second element of the `vector_insn_info` objects. Without knowing the specific implementation of the `vector_insn_info` class, it is difficult to provide a more detailed prediction of the next statement of the code snippet. However," GCC,riscv,410,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the function is dependent on the specific inputs and the implementation of the `vector_insn_info` class. However, based on the name of the function and the parameters it takes, it is likely that the function is intended to calculate the ratio of the second element of the `vector_insn_info` objects. Without knowing the specific implementation of the `vector_insn_info` class, it is difficult to provide a more detailed prediction of the next statement of the code snippet. However," GCC,riscv,411,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return calculate_sew(info1.get_vlmul(), info2.get_ratio()) == ;` This statement is a return statement that returns a boolean value indicating whether the second ratio is invalid for the first lmul. The `calculate_sew` function is called with the `vlmul` and `ratio` values of the two `vector_insn_info` objects, and the result is compared to the constant value ``. If the result is equal to `<" GCC,riscv,412,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be the return statement, which returns a boolean value indicating whether the second ratio is invalid for the first SEW. The return value is calculated using the `calculate_vlmul` function, which takes the SEW and ratio as input and returns the VLmul value. If the VLmul value is equal to `LMUL_RESERVED`, then the second ratio is invalid for the first SEW." GCC,riscv,413,"The next statement after the code snippet you provided is: `return info2.get_ratio() < info1.get_ratio();` This statement is a comparison of the ratios of the two `info` objects, `info2` and `info1`. If the ratio of `info2` is less than the ratio of `info1`, the function will return `true`. Otherwise, it will return `false`." GCC,riscv,414,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the implementation of the `info2` object and the `get_sew()` method. However, based on the syntax and the fact that the method is being called on the `info2` object, it is likely that the next statement will be the return value of the `get_sew()` method." GCC,riscv,415,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the function `second_sew_less_than_first_sew_p` is not specified. However, based on the name of the function and the parameters it takes, it is likely that the function compares the `second_sew` field of the `vector_insn_info` structures `info1` and `info2` and returns `true` if the value of `second_sew` in `info2` is less than the value of `second_sew`" GCC,riscv,416,"The next statement of this code snippet is: return info2.vlmul;" GCC,riscv,417,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the context in which the code is being executed and the values of the variables involved. However, based on the code snippet provided, it is likely that the next statement will be a reference to the `avl` variable, possibly to assign it to another variable or to perform some operation on it." GCC,riscv,418,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be: `m_avl = avl;` This statement assigns the value of the `avl` parameter to the `m_avl` member variable." GCC,riscv,419,"The next statement of this code snippet is: m_demands[type] = value;" GCC,riscv,420,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `m_demands` array and the `type` and `value` variables. However, based on the syntax and the fact that the code is assigning a value to an element of an array, it is likely that the next statement will be a statement that uses the value that was just assigned to the array element." GCC,riscv,421,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the code depends on the specific inputs and the implementation of the `set_dirty` function. However, based on the name of the function and the parameter it takes, it is likely that the function sets a flag or a variable to indicate that the data structure is dirty or has been modified. The parameter `dirty_with_killed_avl_p` suggests that the function may also perform some cleanup or garbage collection related to the AVL tree." GCC,riscv,422,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `EMPTY` state and the surrounding code. However, based on the name of the variable `m_state`, it is likely that the next statement will be an assignment to the `m_state` variable, setting it to a new value." GCC,riscv,423,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be: `m_state = HARD_EMPTY;` This is because the `set_hard_empty()` function is setting the `m_state` variable to the value of the `HARD_EMPTY` constant." GCC,riscv,424,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `set_hard_empty` function. However, based on the name of the function, it is likely that it is setting a flag or a variable to indicate that the object is empty or has no contents." GCC,riscv,425,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `m_insn` and `insn` variables and the context in which this code is being executed. However, based on the syntax and the fact that `m_insn` is being assigned the value of `insn`, it is likely that the next statement will be a statement that uses the value of `m_insn` in some way, such as a method call or a conditional statement." GCC,riscv,426,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `m_insn` and `insn` variables and the context in which this code is being executed. However, based on the syntax and the fact that `m_insn` is being assigned the value of `insn`, it is likely that the next statement will be a statement that uses the value of `m_insn` in some way, such as a method call or a conditional statement." GCC,riscv,427,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the context in which the code is being executed and the values of the variables involved. However, based on the code snippet provided, it is likely that the next statement will be an assignment to the variable `m_ma`, such as `m_ma = ma + 1`." GCC,riscv,428,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the `set_ma` function depends on the specific implementation of the `ma` class and the value of the `ma` parameter. However, based on the name of the function and the parameter, it is likely that the next statement will set the value of the `ma` property of the `ma` class to the value of the `ma` parameter. Here is an example of what the next statement might look like: ``` ma.set_ma(ma); ``` This" GCC,riscv,429,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the context in which the code is being executed and the values of the variables involved. However, based on the code snippet provided, it is likely that the next statement will be a calculation or assignment involving the `m_ratio` variable." GCC,riscv,430,"The next statement in the code snippet is: m_ratio = ratio;" GCC,riscv,431,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the context in which the code is being executed. However, based on the syntax and the fact that `m_sew` is being assigned the value of `sew`, it is likely that the next statement will be a continuation of the current block of code, possibly involving the use of the `m_sew` variable." GCC,riscv,432,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the program depends on the value of the `ta` parameter and the implementation of the `set_ta` function. However, based on the name of the function and the parameter, it is likely that the function sets the value of a `ta` variable or property to the value of the `ta` parameter." GCC,riscv,433,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it is incomplete and the function `set_unknown` is not defined. However, based on the syntax and the fact that the function is not defined, it is likely that the next statement will be a declaration of the function `set_unknown`." GCC,riscv,434,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be: `m_state = VALID;` This statement is assigning the value `VALID` to the variable `m_state`." GCC,riscv,435,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the code depends on the values of the variables and the specific implementation of the `vlmul` function. However, based on the code snippet provided, it is likely that the next statement will be a call to the `vlmul` function with the value of `m_vlmul` as an argument. The `vlmul` function is likely to perform some operation on the value of `m_vlmul` and return the result, which will then be assigned to `m_vlmul`. With" GCC,riscv,436,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `emit_vsetvl_insn ( VSETVL_DISCARD_RESULT , EMIT_BEFORE , info , NULL_RTX , rinsn ) ;` This statement is inside the `if` block that checks if the instruction `rinsn` has a vector type operand. If the instruction does have a vector type operand, the `emit_vsetvl_insn` function is called to emit a `VSETVL` instruction before the instruction `rinsn`. The `V" GCC,riscv,437,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `emit_vsetvl_insn(VSETVL_DISCARD_RESULT, EMIT_BEFORE, info, NULL_RTX, rinsn);`" GCC,riscv,438,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be: `if (insn1->type != insn2->type) return false;` This is because the code is checking if the types of the two instructions are the same, and if they are not, it returns false." GCC,riscv,439,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `if (insn1_info.same_vlmax_p(insn2_info) && insn1_info.compatible_avl_p(insn2_info)) return true;` This statement checks if the `insn1_info` and `insn2_info` objects have the same `vlmax` and are compatible with each other's `avl`. If they do, the function returns `true`." GCC,riscv,440,"The code snippet you provided is a C++ function that appears to be part of a larger program. The function takes a `set_info` object as an argument and performs some operations on it. Based on the code you provided, it is difficult to predict the next statement that will be executed. The function appears to be checking the `read_vl_insn_p` function on the `insn` member of the `set` object, and if it is true, it will call the `get_backward_fault_first_load_insn` function on the `set` object" GCC,riscv,441,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return ta == INVALID_ATTRIBUTE ? get_default_ta() : IS_AGNOSTIC(ta);` This statement is a ternary operator that checks if the value of `ta` is equal to `INVALID_ATTRIBUTE`. If it is, then the function `get_default_ta()` is called and its return value is returned. Otherwise, the function `IS_AGNOSTIC(ta)` is called and its return value is returned." GCC,riscv,442,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return ta == INVALID_ATTRIBUTE ? get_default_ta() : IS_AGNOSTIC(ta);` This statement is a ternary operator that checks if the value of `ta` is equal to `INVALID_ATTRIBUTE`. If it is, then the function `get_default_ta()` is called and its return value is returned. Otherwise, the function `IS_AGNOSTIC(ta)` is called and its return value is returned." GCC,riscv,443,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `vector_insn_infos` method and the `uid` method of the `insn` object. However, based on the context of the code snippet, it is likely that the next statement will be a return statement, as the `vector_insn_infos` method is being called on the `m_vector_manager` object and the result is being stored in the `info` variable. The `return` statement is then called, which will return the" GCC,riscv,444,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be the assignment of the `info` variable to the result of the `vector_insn_info::get_unknown()` method. The `vector_insn_info::get_unknown()` method is called if the current instruction is a call, an assembly instruction, or if it defines a register that is not a vector register (i.e., it is not a VL_REGNUM or VTYPE_REGNUM). The method returns an instance of the `vector_insn_info` class that represents an unknown vector instruction. There" GCC,riscv,445,"The next statement after the `if` statement would be: `info = require;`" GCC,riscv,446,"The next statement after the `if` block will be executed if the condition `info.valid_p() && !need_vsetvl(require, info)` is `false`. In this case, the `return` statement will be executed, which means that the function will return without executing any further statements." GCC,riscv,447,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the function depends on the value of the `m_state` member variable, which is not shown in the code snippet. However, based on the name of the function `uninit_p`, it appears that the function is intended to check whether the object is in an uninitialized state. If the `m_state` member variable is equal to the value `UNINITIALIZED`, then the function will return `true`, indicating that the object is in an uninitialized state. If the `" GCC,riscv,448,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be a conditional statement that checks the value of `m_state` and performs some action based on that value. For example, it could be: ``` if (m_state == UNINITIALIZED) { // do something } ``` Or it could be: ``` if (m_state != UNINITIALIZED) { // do something else } ``` It's difficult to say for sure without more context, but these are the most common uses of the `==` operator in C" GCC,riscv,449,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet without knowing the context and the definition of the functions and variables used. However, based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the next statement after `set_insn(insn)` would be `return true`." GCC,riscv,450,"The next statement after the `return` statement in the code snippet you provided is the end of the function. The function will return a value based on the condition specified in the `return` statement. In this case, the function will return `true` if `m_state` is equal to `VALID`, `DIRTY`, or `DIRTY_WITH_KILLED_AVL`, and `false` otherwise." GCC,riscv,451,"The next statement after `return m_state == VALID;` would be the statement that is executed after the function returns. In this case, the function is returning a boolean value, so the next statement would be the statement that is executed after the function returns, which would be the statement that is executed after the `return` statement. Without knowing the context of the code, it is not possible to predict exactly what the next statement will be. However, it is likely that the next statement will be the statement that is executed after the function returns, which could be a statement that uses the return value of" GCC,riscv,452,"The next statement after `return m_state == VALID;` would be the statement that is executed after the function returns. In this case, the function is returning a boolean value, so the next statement would be the statement that is executed after the function returns, which would be the statement that is executed after the `return` statement. Without knowing the context of the code, it is not possible to predict exactly what the next statement will be. However, it is likely that the next statement will be the statement that is executed after the function returns, which could be a statement that uses the return value of" GCC,riscv,453,"The next statement of this code snippet is: return exact_log2 ( sew ) && sew >= && sew <= ; This statement is a boolean expression that checks if the input `sew` is a valid value for the `sew` parameter of the `valid_sew_p` function. The expression first checks if `sew` is a power of 2 using the `exact_log2` function, and then checks if `sew` is within the range of and" GCC,riscv,454,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be a comparison of the `sew` value with a specific number, possibly a power of 2. The `exact_log2` function returns the exact logarithm of the input value to the base 2, so the first statement of the code snippet is checking whether the `sew` value is a power of 2. The second statement is checking whether the `sew` value is greater than or equal to a specific number, which is likely to be a power of 2. The third statement is checking whether the" GCC,riscv,455,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be a check for the type of instruction represented by the `rinsn` parameter. The `vector_config_insn_p` function is likely to be used to determine whether a given instruction is a vector configuration instruction, which is an instruction that configures the vector unit for a specific operation. Here is a possible next statement for this code snippet: ``` if (GET_CODE (rinsn) == VECTOR_CONFIG) ``` This statement checks the opcode of the instruction represented by `rinsn` to see if" GCC,riscv,456,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be a check for the type of instruction represented by the `rinsn` parameter. The `vector_config_insn_p` function is likely to be used to determine whether a given instruction is a vector configuration instruction, which is an instruction that configures the vector unit for a specific operation. Here is a possible next statement for this code snippet: ``` if (GET_CODE (rinsn) == VECTOR_CONFIG) ``` This statement checks the opcode of the instruction represented by `rinsn` to see if" GCC,riscv,457,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `for (insn_info *insn : bb->real_insns()) {` This is a loop that iterates over the instructions in the basic block `bb`. The loop variable `insn` is an `insn_info` pointer, and the loop body will execute for each instruction in the block." GCC,riscv,458,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `vector_insn_info` class and the values of the variables used in the constructor. However, based on the syntax and the fact that the constructor is initializing member variables, it is likely that the next statement will be an assignment to one of the member variables, such as `m_state` or `m_demands`. It is also possible that the constructor will call a function or method to initialize the `m_insn` member variable. Without" GCC,riscv,459,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `vector_insn_info` class and the values of the variables used in the constructor. However, based on the syntax and the fact that the constructor is initializing member variables, it is likely that the next statement will be an assignment to one of the member variables, such as `m_state` or `m_demands`. It is also possible that the constructor will call a function or method to initialize the `m_insn` member variable. Without" GCC,riscv,460,The next statement after the `return` statement in the code snippet is the closing brace `}` of the function. GCC,riscv,461,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the function `vlmax_avl_insn_p` is dependent on the specific input it receives. However, based on the name of the function and the context in which it is being called, it is likely that the function is checking whether the input instruction `rinsn` is a valid AVL instruction. If the input instruction is not a valid AVL instruction, the function may return `false`." GCC,riscv,462,"The next statement after the code snippet you provided is likely to be the evaluation of the `x && rtx_equal_p ( x , RVV_VLMAX )` expression. The `&&` operator is a logical AND operator, which returns `true` if both of its operands are non-zero. In this case, the first operand is `x`, and the second operand is the result of the `rtx_equal_p` function, which compares two `rtx` objects for equality. If `x` is non-zero and the `rt" GCC,riscv,463,"The next statement after the `return` statement in the code snippet is the end of the function. The function `calculate_vlmul` is called with the values of `info1.get_sew()` and `info2.get_ratio()` as arguments, and the result of the function is returned as the value of the `return` statement." GCC,riscv,464,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `m_avl = avl_info();`" GCC,riscv,465,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `m_avl = avl_info();`" GCC,riscv,466,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return false;` Explanation: The `if` statement checks if `vector_config_insn_p ( rinsn )` is true. If it is not true, the function returns `false`. If it is true, the function checks if `INSN_CODE ( rinsn )` is equal to `CODE_FOR_vsetvl_discard_resultdi` or `CODE_FOR_vsetvl_discard_resultsi`. If it is not equal to either of those codes, the function" GCC,riscv,467,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return false;` Explanation: The `if` statement checks if `vector_config_insn_p ( rinsn )` is true. If it is not true, the function returns `false`. If it is true, the function checks if `INSN_CODE ( rinsn )` is equal to `CODE_FOR_vsetvl_discard_resultdi` or `CODE_FOR_vsetvl_discard_resultsi`. If it is not equal to either of those codes, the function" GCC,riscv,468,"The next statement after the `return` statement in the code snippet you provided is the end of the function. The `return` statement is the last statement in the function, and it returns a value based on the conditions specified in the `if` statement. Here's the code snippet with the next statement added: ``` return ( INSN_CODE ( rinsn ) == CODE_FOR_vsetvldi || INSN_CODE ( rinsn ) == CODE_FOR_vsetvlsi ) ; ``` The next statement after the `return` statement is the" GCC,riscv,469,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `add_input_operand ( CONSTM1_RTX ( mode ) , mode ) ;` This statement adds an input operand to the current instruction, with the operand being a constant value of -1. The constant value is obtained by calling the `CONSTM1_RTX` function, which returns a constant RTX (Register Transfer Expression) with the value -1. The `mode` parameter is used to specify the machine mode (i.e., the size and type of the operand) for the constant value." GCC,riscv,470,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `add_avl_type_operand` function and the `avl_type` type. However, based on the name of the function and the type of the parameter, it is likely that the function will add an operand of the specified type to an AVL tree." GCC,riscv,471,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `add_avl_type_operand` function and the `avl_type` type. However, based on the name of the function and the type of the parameter, it is likely that the function will add an operand of the specified type to an AVL tree." GCC,riscv,472,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `rtx tail_policy_rtx = gen_int_mode ( vta , Pmode ) ;` This statement generates a new `rtx` object with the value of `vta` in the mode `Pmode`. The `gen_int_mode` function is used to generate the `rtx` object, and it takes two arguments: the value to be stored in the `rtx` object, and the mode in which the value should be stored. In this case, the value is `vta`, and the mode is" GCC,riscv,473,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the `add_policy_operand` function is not specified. However, based on the function signature and the names of the parameters, it appears that the function is intended to add a policy operand to a policy object. Without knowing the specific implementation of the `add_policy_operand` function, it is not possible to determine the exact behavior of the function or the next statement that will be executed. However, some possible next statements that could be executed by the function include: * Adding" GCC,riscv,474,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the `add_vundef_operand` function is not specified. However, based on the name of the function and the fact that it takes a `machine_mode` parameter, it is likely that the function adds an undefined operand to a machine instruction. Without knowing the specific implementation of the `add_vundef_operand` function, it is difficult to predict exactly what the next statement of the code snippet will be. However, some possible next statements could include: *" GCC,riscv,475,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `add_input_operand ( RVV_VUNDEF ( mode ) , mode ) ;` This statement adds an input operand to the current instruction, where the operand is a vector of undefined values with the same mode as the instruction. The `RVV_VUNDEF` function is used to generate the vector of undefined values." GCC,riscv,476,"Based on the code snippet provided, it is not possible to predict the next statement with certainty as the value of the variable `NUM_LIT` is not provided. However, based on the context of the code, it appears that `NUM_LIT` is a constant value that represents the number of bits in the mantissa of a floating-point number. In this case, the next statement in the `case LMUL_2` block would likely be `ratio = sew / NUM_LIT;`, which would divide the value of `sew` by the number of bits in" GCC,riscv,477,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific values of the input parameters and the implementation of the `compute_vlmax` function. However, based on the names of the parameters and the fact that the function is computing a maximum value, it is likely that the next statement of the code snippet will be a comparison or a calculation that involves the `vector_bits`, `elt_size`, and `min_size` parameters. Without further information or context, it is not possible to provide a more specific prediction of the next statement of" GCC,riscv,478,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be the evaluation of the `CONST_INT_P` macro, which checks if the `elt` variable is an integer constant. If the `elt` variable is not an integer constant, the `CONST_INT_P` macro will return `false`, and the code will not proceed to the next statement. Therefore, the next statement of this code snippet is likely to be the evaluation of the `IN_RANGE` macro, which checks if the value of the `elt` variable is within the specified range. If the value of the `" GCC,riscv,479,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the `get_sew` function is not specified. However, based on the name of the function and the fact that it takes a `vmode` argument, it is likely that the function returns the ""effective word size"" (EWS) for the specified virtual machine mode. The EWS is the number of bits in the virtual machine's word size, which is typically a power of 2 (e.g., 32, 64, 128). The E" GCC,riscv,480,"The next statement of this code snippet is: emit_insn ( gen_vsetvl ( Pmode , vl , RVV_VLMAX , gen_int_mode ( sew , Pmode ) , gen_int_mode ( get_vlmul ( vmode ) , Pmode ) , const0_rtx , const0_rtx ) ) ;" GCC,riscv,481,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `emit_pred_op ( icode , NULL_RTX , dest , src , len , mask_mode , false ) ;` This statement calls the `emit_pred_op` function with the following arguments: * `icode`: The instruction code for the operation to be performed. * `NULL_RTX`: A null pointer, indicating that there is no predicate for this operation. * `dest`: The destination operand for the operation. * `src`: The source operand for the operation. * `len" GCC,riscv,482,"The next statement after the given code snippet is likely to be the return statement, as the function `emit_pred_op` is called with the last argument set to `false`, which means that the function will not return a value. Therefore, the next statement is likely to be the return statement, which is the last statement in the function." GCC,riscv,483,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific values of the variables and the implementation of the `add_output_operand`, `add_input_operand`, `add_all_one_mask_operand`, and `add_vundef_operand` functions. However, based on the names of the functions and the context of the code, it is likely that the next statement will be a call to one of these functions, possibly with the `dest` or `src` variables as arguments." GCC,riscv,484,"The next statement after the given code snippet is likely to be the return statement of the `emit_pred_op` function, which is not shown in the code snippet. The `emit_pred_op` function is a low-level function that emits a predicate operation instruction to the output file. The function takes several arguments, including the instruction code `icode`, the destination register `dest`, the source register `src`, the length of the instruction `len`, the mask mode `mask_mode`, and a boolean value indicating whether the operation is a predicate operation or not. The function emits the" GCC,riscv,485,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `emit_pred_op ( icode , NULL_RTX , dest , src , len , mask_mode , true ) ;` This statement calls the `emit_pred_op` function with the given arguments. The function is not defined in the code snippet provided, so it is not possible to determine what it does or what its return value is." GCC,riscv,486,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the `emit_hard_vlmax_vsetvl` function is not specified. However, based on the name of the function, it appears to be related to emitting a hard VLMAX value for the `vsetvl` instruction. The `vsetvl` instruction is used to set the vector length for a given vector register, and the `emit_hard_vlmax_vsetvl` function is likely being used to emit a hard VLMAX value for this instruction. The `" GCC,riscv,487,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `emit_insn ( gen_vlmax_avl ( Pmode , vl , gen_int_mode ( ratio , Pmode ) ) ) ;` This statement is calling the `emit_insn` function with the `gen_vlmax_avl` instruction as its first argument, and the `Pmode` and `vl` variables as its second and third arguments, respectively. The `gen_int_mode` function is being called with the `ratio` variable as its first argument and the `Pmode` variable as" GCC,riscv,488,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet without knowing the context and the definition of the `expand_insn` function. However, based on the syntax and the fact that the function is being called with three arguments, it is likely that the next statement will be a call to another function or a statement that uses the result of the `expand_insn` function." GCC,riscv,489,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `expand_insn ( icode , m_opno , m_ops ) ;` This is because the `if` statement checks the value of `temporary_volatile_p` and if it is true, it executes the code inside the `if` block, which includes the `expand_insn` function call." GCC,riscv,490,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `rtx elt;` This line declares a variable `elt` of type `rtx`, which is a type used in the GNU Compiler Collection (GCC) to represent a register or a memory location. The variable `elt` is used to store the result of the `const_vec_duplicate_p` function, which checks if the `src` operand is a vector that can be duplicated." GCC,riscv,491,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `emit_vlmax_op(code_for_pred_mov(mode), target, src, mask_mode);` This statement is calling the `emit_vlmax_op` function, which is a function that emits a vector maximum operation. The function takes four arguments: the first is the code for the predicate move operation, which is obtained by calling the `code_for_pred_mov` function with the current mode as an argument. The second argument is the target register, which is the register that the result of the operation will be" GCC,riscv,492,"The code snippet is defining a function that returns a register that contains the result of a comparison operation. The comparison is performed using the `GTU` instruction, which performs an unsigned greater-than comparison. The operands for the comparison are `avl` and `const0_rtx`, which are both registers. The function first generates a new register using `gen_reg_rtx`, which is a function that allocates a new register. The new register is then set to the result of the comparison using `emit_insn`, which is a function that emits an instruction to the assembler." GCC,riscv,493,"This code snippet is generating a new register `tmp` and setting its value to the result of a comparison between `avl` and `const0_rtx`. The comparison is done using the `GTU` instruction, which performs an unsigned greater-than comparison. Therefore, the next statement of this code snippet is likely to be a conditional jump or branch instruction that depends on the result of the comparison. For example, it could be a `jg` (jump if greater) instruction that jumps to a different part of the code if the comparison result is true, or a `jle`" GCC,riscv,494,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `unsigned int lmul = get_lmul ( vmode ) ;`" GCC,riscv,495,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet without knowing the context and the specific implementation of the functions being called. However, based on the names of the functions and the parameters being passed, it appears that the code is generating a vector of values with a specific length and element size, and possibly also with a specific number of lanes. The `gen_vsetvl_no_side_effects` function appears to be generating a vector of values with a specific length and element size, and possibly also with a specific number of lanes. The `Pmode` parameter is likely specifying the mode" GCC,riscv,496,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet without knowing the context and the purpose of the code. However, based on the syntax and the name of the function being called (`quick_push`), it is likely that the next statement will be a call to a function that pushes the value stored in `const1_rtx` onto a stack or a queue." GCC,riscv,497,"The next statement after the `return` statement in the code snippet is the `gen_int_mode` function call. The `gen_int_mode` function is called with two arguments: `type` and `Pmode`. The function returns a value of type `int` that is determined by the `type` and `Pmode` arguments. Therefore, the next statement after the `return` statement is the `gen_int_mode` function call, which returns a value of type `int`." GCC,riscv,498,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the code depends on the specific input and the implementation of the `get_ma` function. However, based on the name of the function and the parameter it takes, it is likely that the function returns a value that is related to the `ma` parameter. Without more information about the code, it is not possible to make a more specific prediction about the next statement." GCC,riscv,499,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the code depends on the specific input and the implementation of the `get_ma` function. However, based on the name of the function and the parameter it takes, it is likely that the function returns a value that is related to the `ma` parameter. Without more information about the code, it is not possible to make a more specific prediction about the next statement." GCC,riscv,500,The next statement after `return MASK_ANY ;` would be the end of the function. GCC,riscv,501,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the `get_prefer_mask_policy` function is not defined in the code snippet provided. However, based on the name of the function and the fact that it is returning an `enum mask_policy`, it is likely that the function is intended to return a value that represents the preferred mask policy for a particular operation. The `enum mask_policy` type is not defined in the code snippet, so it is not possible to determine the specific values that the function may return. Without more information about the" GCC,riscv,502,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be a return statement, as the function `get_prefer_tail_policy()` is expected to return a value of type `enum tail_policy`. Therefore, the next statement is likely to be: ``` return TAIL_ANY; ``` This will return the value `TAIL_ANY` of type `enum tail_policy` from the function `get_prefer_tail_policy()`." GCC,riscv,503,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return mode_vtype_infos.ratio_for_min_vlen64[mode];` This is because the `if` statement checks if `TARGET_MIN_VLEN` is equal to ``, and if it is, it returns the value of `mode_vtype_infos.ratio_for_min_vlen32[mode]`. If `TARGET_MIN_VLEN` is not equal to ``, then the" GCC,riscv,504,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return mode_vtype_infos.ratio_for_min_vlen64[mode];` This is because the `if` statement checks if `TARGET_MIN_VLEN` is equal to ``, and if it is, it returns the value of `mode_vtype_infos.ratio_for_min_vlen32[mode]`. If `TARGET_MIN_VLEN` is not equal to ``, then the" GCC,riscv,505,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `get_sew` function and the value of the `mode` parameter. However, based on the name of the function and the parameter, it is likely that the function is intended to return the ""element width"" of a machine mode, which is the number of bits in the mode's element type. In this case, the next statement of the code snippet would likely be a `return` statement that returns the element width of the `mode` parameter. For example" GCC,riscv,506,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `sew = GET_MODE_CLASS ( mode ) == MODE_VECTOR_BOOL ? : GET_MODE_BITSIZE ( GET_MODE_INNER ( mode ) ) ;` This statement assigns the value of `sew` to be the result of the ternary operator, which is either `` if the mode class is `MODE_VECTOR_BOOL`, or the bit size of the inner mode if the mode class is not `MODE_VECTOR" GCC,riscv,507,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return INVALID_ATTRIBUTE;` This is because the `if` statement checks if the value of `INTVAL ( ta )` is equal to `TAIL_ANY`, and if it is, the function returns `INVALID_ATTRIBUTE`. If the value of `INTVAL ( ta )` is not equal to `TAIL_ANY`, the function will continue to execute the next statement, which is the `return` statement." GCC,riscv,508,"The next statement after the `switch` statement is the `default` case, which is unreachable. The `gcc_unreachable()` function is used to indicate that the `default` case is unreachable and should never be executed. Therefore, the next statement after the `switch` statement is the `default` case, which is unreachable." GCC,riscv,509,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `default :` This is a `switch` statement in C++, which is used to execute different blocks of code based on the value of a variable. In this case, the variable is `LMUL`, and the `switch` statement is checking the value of `LMUL` and executing the corresponding block of code. The `default` case is executed if none of the other cases match the value of `LMUL`. In this case, it is not clear what the code inside the `default` case is, as it is not provided in the" GCC,riscv,510,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `mode = GET_MODE_INNER ( mode );` This statement is part of the `FOR_EACH_MODE_IN_CLASS` macro, which iterates over all modes in the specified class (in this case, `mclass`). The `GET_MODE_INNER` function returns the inner mode of the current mode, which is then assigned to the `mode` variable. The next statement will be the condition check `if ( inner_mode == GET_MODE_INNER ( mode ) && known_eq ( nun" GCC,riscv,511,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return mode_vtype_infos.vlmul_for_min_vlen64[mode];` This is because the `if` statement checks if `TARGET_MIN_VLEN` is equal to ``, and if it is, it returns the value of `mode_vtype_infos.vlmul_for_min_vlen32[mode]`. If `TARGET_MIN_VLEN` is not equal to ``, then the" GCC,riscv,512,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `i32vl = gen_reg_rtx ( Pmode ) ;` This statement is executed if the value of `avl_int` is greater than `vlmax_min` but less than or equal to `vlmax_max`. In this case, a new register is allocated for `i32vl` and the value of `avl_int` is multiplied by `NUM_LIT` and stored in the register." GCC,riscv,513,"The next statement of the code snippet is: `i32vl = gen_reg_rtx (Pmode);` This statement declares a new register `i32vl` of type `Pmode` (which is a 32-bit integer mode). The register is used to store the result of the `vsetvl` instruction, which sets the vector length for the target vector." GCC,riscv,514,The next statement after `case LT :` is `return simm5_p ( x ) ;`. GCC,riscv,515,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the `insn_expander` function is not specified. However, based on the name of the function and the fact that it is being called with a numerical literal as an argument, it is likely that the function is responsible for expanding a machine instruction into a more detailed representation. Without more information about the specific implementation of the `insn_expander` function, it is not possible to provide a more detailed prediction of the next statement." GCC,riscv,516,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the `insn_expander` function is not specified. However, based on the name of the function and the fact that it is being called with a numerical literal as an argument, it is likely that the function is responsible for expanding a machine instruction into a more detailed representation. Without more information about the specific implementation of the `insn_expander` function, it is not possible to provide a more detailed prediction of the next statement." GCC,riscv,517,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `rtx tmp = gen_reg_rtx ( mode ) ;`" GCC,riscv,518,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `emit_vlmax_op ( code_for_pred_mov ( mode ) , dest , src , mask_mode ) ;` This statement is emitting a vector move operation with a predicate mask, where the source and destination operands are both vectors. The `emit_vlmax_op` function is used to emit the vector move operation, and the `code_for_pred_mov` function is used to generate the machine code for the predicate move operation. The `mask_mode` parameter is used to specify the predicate mask mode." GCC,riscv,519,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `vlmul_for_min_vlen64[MODE##mode] = VLMUL_FOR_MIN_VLEN64;` This statement assigns the value of `VLMUL_FOR_MIN_VLEN64` to the `vlmul_for_min_vlen64` array at the index `MODE##mode`." GCC,riscv,520,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be: `return (INTVAL ( x ) < 0 && INTVAL ( x ) >= -32);` This is because the `neg_simm5_p` function is checking if the value of `x` is a negative number that can be represented as a 5-bit signed immediate value. The `INTVAL` macro is used to extract the integer value from the `x` operand, and the `CONST_INT_P` macro is used to check if `x` is a constant integer." GCC,riscv,521,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return IN_RANGE ( INTVAL ( x ) , - , ) ;` This statement is executed if the `CONST_INT_P` check fails, which means that `x` is not a constant integer. The `IN_RANGE` function is called with the value of `x` as its first argument, and the lower and upper bounds of the range as its second and third arguments. The function returns `true` if the value of `x` is within the" GCC,riscv,522,"The code snippet you provided is a part of a function that appears to be generating code for a vector operation. The function takes several parameters, including `code_for_pred_broadcast`, `vector_mode`, `scalar_mode`, `vl`, and `mask_mode`. The function first checks if the `immediate_operand` is a constant and if it is not, it forces the operand to be a register. Then, it checks if the operand is a constant integer and if it is, it forces the operand to be a register. The next statement is" GCC,riscv,523,"The next statement of this code snippet is: return IN_RANGE ( INTVAL ( x ) , - , ) ; This statement is executed if the condition `! CONST_INT_P ( x )` is false, which means that `x` is a constant integer. The function `IN_RANGE` is called with the value of `x` as its first argument, and the lower and upper bounds of the range as its second and third arguments, respectively. The function returns a boolean value indicating whether the value of `" GCC,riscv,524,"The next statement of this code snippet is: return IN_RANGE ( INTVAL ( x ) , - , ) ; This statement is executed if the condition `! CONST_INT_P ( x )` is false, which means that `x` is a constant integer. The function `IN_RANGE` is called with the value of `x` as its first argument, and the lower and upper bounds of the range as its second and third arguments, respectively. The function returns a boolean value indicating whether the value of `" GCC,riscv,525,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific inputs and the behavior of the functions being called. However, based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the next statement will be an invocation of the `emit_insn` function, which is used to generate and emit a new instruction. The instruction being generated is a `pred_slide` instruction, which is a vector operation that performs a slide operation on a vector of elements. The `pred_slide` instruction takes several operands, including the vector elements, the mask, and the scalar operands" GCC,riscv,526,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `merge = gen_lowpart ( demote_mode , ops [ ] ) ;` This statement is assigning the value of `ops[]` to `merge`, which is a register in the demote mode. The `gen_lowpart` function is used to generate a low part of the register, which is the lower half of the register in little-endian byte order. The `ops[]` is an operand that was previously assigned to a register" GCC,riscv,527,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the code depends on the specific values of the variables and the context in which it is executed. However, based on the information provided, it is likely that the next statement will be a call to a function that takes the `mask`, `fmask`, and `save_libcall_adjustment` variables as arguments." GCC,riscv,528,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `n += (GET_MODE_SIZE(mode).to_constant() + UNITS_PER_WORD - ) / UNITS_PER_WORD;` This statement is executed if the `riscv_classify_address` function returns `false` and the `riscv_v_ext_vector_mode_p` function returns `false`. It calculates the number of words needed to store the value in `mode` and adds it to `n`." GCC,riscv,529,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the context in which the code is being executed. However, based on the syntax and the fact that the code is inside a function, it is likely that the next statement will be the start of a new block of code, such as an `if` statement or a `while` loop." GCC,riscv,530,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `dwarf = alloc_reg_note ( REG_CFA_RESTORE , reg , dwarf ) ;` This statement is part of a loop that iterates over the general-purpose registers and sets up a DWARF note for each register that is saved on the stack. The `alloc_reg_note` function is used to allocate a new register note, and the `REG_CFA_RESTORE` flag is used to indicate that the register is restored from the stack. The `reg" GCC,riscv,531,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be the assignment of the `adjust_sp_rtx` variable, which is a `rtx` object representing the adjustment of the stack pointer. The code is using the `gen_rtx_SET` function to create a new `rtx` object that represents the assignment of the `stack_pointer_rtx` variable to the result of the `gen_rtx_PLUS` function, which is a `rtx` object representing the addition of the `stack_pointer_rtx` variable and the `GEN_INT` object" GCC,riscv,532,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return COSTS_N_INSNS(double_insns);` Explanation: The `if` statement checks if the mode of `x` is not a vector mode and if the size of the mode is equal to `UNITS_PER_WORD * `. If this condition is true, the function returns the cost of double insns. The `COSTS_N_INSNS` macro is defined in the RISC-V GCC source code as follows:" GCC,riscv,533,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return COSTS_N_INSNS ( double_insns ) ;` This is because the `if` statement checks whether the mode of `x` is not a vector mode and the size of the mode is equal to `UNITS_PER_WORD * `. If this condition is true, the function returns the cost of double instructions. Otherwise, it returns the cost of single instructions." GCC,riscv,534,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be: `final_src = src + (length - 1) * bytes_per_iter;` This statement calculates the address of the final source byte that needs to be moved, based on the length of the block and the number of bytes per iteration. The `final_src` variable is then used in the loop that moves the block of memory." GCC,riscv,535,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be a conditional jump instruction, such as `jne` or `jump`, based on the value of the `test` variable. The `test` variable is set to the result of a comparison between `src_reg` and `final_src`, and the conditional jump instruction will be executed if the comparison is true. The exact behavior of the code snippet will depend on the specific values of the variables and the implementation of the `riscv_block_move_straight` and `riscv_emit_move` functions. However, in general," GCC,riscv,536,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `shifted_val = value << shift;` This statement shifts the value of `value` to the left by `shift` bits, and stores the result in `shifted_val`." GCC,riscv,537,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `int upper_trailing_ones = ctz_hwi(~value >> );` Explanation: The code snippet is part of a function that is trying to find the best way to rotate a value by a certain number of bits. The function is using the `clz_hwi` and `ctz_hwi` functions to count the number of leading and trailing zeros in the value, and it is using these counts to determine the best way to rotate the value. The first part of" GCC,riscv,538,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `if ( GET_CODE ( *iter ) == CONST_POLY_INT ) return true ;` This statement checks if the current element in the array is a constant polynomial integer, and if so, returns true. If the current element is not a constant polynomial integer, the code continues to the next statement." GCC,riscv,539,"The next statement after the code snippet you provided is likely to be the return value of the function. In this case, the function is returning a boolean value, which is determined by the conditions in the code snippet. The conditions are: * `reload_completed`: This variable is set to `true` if the reload operation has completed successfully. * `known_eq`: This function checks if the value of `cfun->machine->frame.total_size` is equal to the value of ``. * `!cfun->machine->interrupt_handler_" GCC,riscv,540,"Based on the code snippet you provided, it appears that the next statement will be: case MULT: The switch statement is checking the value of GET_CODE(x), which is a macro that returns the code of the expression x. The code of an expression is a unique integer value that identifies the type of expression. In this case, the code of the expression x is being checked to see if it matches any of the cases in the switch statement. If the code matches a case, the corresponding statement will be executed. In this case, the next statement after the PLUS case is the" GCC,riscv,541,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `case CONST_INT: if (riscv_v_ext_vector_mode_p(mode)) return false;` This is a case statement that checks if the mode is a vector mode (i.e., `riscv_v_ext_vector_mode_p(mode)` returns true) and if so, returns false. If the mode is not a vector mode, the code continues to the next statement." GCC,riscv,542,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return riscv_hard_regno_nregs(GP_REG_FIRST, mode);` This statement is executed if the condition `reg_class_subset_p(rclass, GR_REGS)` is true, which means that the register class `rclass` is a subset of the general-purpose registers `GR_REGS`. The function `riscv_hard_regno_nregs` returns the number of registers in the given register class and mode." GCC,riscv,543,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be the initialization of the `extra_caller_saves` variable, which is a `HARD_REG_SET` type. The `HARD_REG_SET` type is used to represent a set of hard registers, which are registers that are not stored in memory and are used for temporary storage. The `extra_caller_saves` variable is initialized by calling the `callee_abis.caller_save_regs()` method, which returns a set of hard registers that are caller-saved, meaning that they are" GCC,riscv,544,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the values of the variables and the specific implementation of the functions being called. However, based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the next statement will be the return statement, which will return the value of the `components` bitmap. The code snippet is part of a function that is likely used to determine the registers that are used in a function call. The function takes a number of bitmaps as arguments, including `extra_caller_saves`, `in`, `gen`, and `kill`. These bit" GCC,riscv,545,"Based on the code snippet you provided, it appears to be part of a function that is setting up a stack frame for a function call. The code is checking which registers need to be saved on the stack and setting the appropriate bits in the frame's mask and fmask fields. The next statement in the code snippet is: frame -> mask |= << ( regno - GP_REG_FIRST ) , num_x_saved ++ ; This statement is setting the mask for the general purpose registers (GP_REG_FIRST to GP_REG" GCC,riscv,546,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `if ( UNITS_PER_FP_ARG == ) { for ( int regno = FP_REG_FIRST ; regno <= FP_REG_LAST ; regno ++ ) call_used_regs [ regno ] = ; }` This statement is part of the `if` block that checks if the `UNITS_PER_FP_ARG` macro is defined and if it is equal to a specific value. If this condition is" GCC,riscv,547,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `for (int regno = FP_REG_FIRST; regno <= FP_REG_LAST; regno++) {` This is the start of a loop that iterates over the floating-point registers, which are represented by the `regno` variable. The loop body will set the `fixed_regs` and `call_used_regs` arrays for each floating-point register." GCC,riscv,548,"The next statement of this code snippet is: riscv_bytes_per_vector_chunk = TARGET_MIN_VLEN;" GCC,riscv,549,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of a code snippet without knowing the context and the specific implementation of the function being called. However, based on the function name and the parameters, it is likely that the next statement will be related to disqualifying components based on the values in the sbitmap and edge parameters. Here are some possible next statements: 1. `sbitmap_clear_bit(sbitmap, edge->src->index);` 2. `sbitmap_set_bit(sbitmap, edge->dest->index);` 3. `sbitmap_" GCC,riscv,550,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of a code snippet without knowing the context and the specific implementation of the function being called. However, based on the function name and the parameters, it is likely that the next statement will be related to disqualifying components based on the values in the sbitmap and edge parameters. Here are some possible next statements: 1. `sbitmap_clear_bit(sbitmap, edge->src->index);` 2. `sbitmap_set_bit(sbitmap, edge->dest->index);` 3. `sbitmap_" GCC,riscv,551,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return get_section(name, s->named.common.flags, NULL);` This statement is executed if the `if` condition is true, which means that the `s` pointer is not null and the `s->named.name` field starts with the string literal ``. The `get_section` function is called with the `name` variable as the first argument, which is a pointer to a string that contains the name of the section, and the `s->named.common.flags` field as the second" GCC,riscv,552,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `if (s == NULL) {`" GCC,riscv,553,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `riscv_process_components(components, false);`" GCC,riscv,554,"The next statement of this code snippet is: * op0 = riscv_force_binary ( word_mode , fp_code , cmp_op0 , cmp_op1 ) ; Explanation: The code snippet is a part of the RISC-V instruction set architecture (ISA) and is responsible for generating the RISC-V assembly code for floating-point comparison operations. The code snippet is using the `riscv_force_binary` function to generate the RISC-V assembly code for the comparison operation. The `riscv_" GCC,riscv,555,"The next statement of this code snippet is: * op0 = riscv_force_binary ( word_mode , fp_code , cmp_op0 , cmp_op1 ) ; Explanation: The code snippet is part of a function that is generating RISC-V assembly code for a comparison operation. The function is using a switch statement to handle different comparison operations, and the current case is for the ""EQ"" operation. The code snippet is setting the ""op0"" variable to the result of the ""riscv_force_binary"" function" GCC,riscv,556,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `rtx inv_target = riscv_force_binary ( word_mode , inv_code , cmp0 , cmp1 ) ;` This statement is assigning the result of the `riscv_force_binary` function to the `inv_target` variable, which is a `rtx` (register or immediate) value. The `riscv_force_binary` function is called with the `word_mode` parameter, which is a mode that represents a 32-bit or 64-bit word, depending" GCC,riscv,557,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `riscv_process_components(components, true);`" GCC,riscv,558,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the `riscv_process_components` function is not specified. However, based on the name of the function and the fact that it is being passed a `true` value as its second argument, it is likely that the function is processing the `components` array and returning a new array or modifying the existing array in some way." GCC,riscv,559,"The next statement in the code snippet is: `case EXCESS_PRECISION_TYPE_FLOAT16 :`" GCC,riscv,560,"The next statement in this code snippet is: `case EXCESS_PRECISION_TYPE_IMPLICIT :` This is because the `switch` statement is currently evaluating the value of `EXCESS_PRECISION_TYPE`, and the next value to be evaluated is `EXCESS_PRECISION_TYPE_IMPLICIT`." GCC,riscv,561,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `riscv_emit_int_compare (&code, &op0, &op1);`" GCC,riscv,562,"The code snippet is using the RISC-V instruction set architecture (ISA) and is generating code for a conditional move instruction. The instruction is using the `if-then-else` construct to select the source operand based on the condition. The first `gcc_assert` statement is checking that the mode of the instruction is `MODE_INT`, which means that the instruction is operating on integer values. The second `gcc_assert` statement is checking that the first source operand is a register or a constant, and the third `gcc_assert` statement is checking that the second source operand" GCC,riscv,563,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `rtx cond = gen_rtx_fmt_ee ( code , mode , op0 , op1 ) ;` This statement is generating a new RTX (Register Transfer Language) expression, which is a low-level representation of the assembly code that will be generated by the compiler. The `gen_rtx_fmt_ee` function is used to generate an RTX expression that represents a comparison operation, where the `code` parameter specifies the type of comparison (e.g. `EQ`, `NE`, `LT`, etc.)," GCC,riscv,564,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `if ( ( frame -> mask | frame -> fmask ) != ) { step2 = riscv_first_stack_step ( frame ) ; step1 -= step2 ; }` This statement checks if the frame mask or frame fmask of the current frame is not equal to a certain value (represented by ``). If it is not equal, then it calculates the first stack step using the `riscv_first_stack_step` function and subtracts it from `step1`." GCC,riscv,565,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `rtx dwarf = NULL_RTX;` This statement declares a new variable `dwarf` of type `rtx` and initializes it to `NULL_RTX`." GCC,riscv,566,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet as it is dependent on the values of the variables and the specific machine architecture being used. However, based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the next statement will be a call to the `riscv_expand_op` function with the `ASHIFT` operation, as the `pow2p_hwi` function is being used to check if the `multiplier_abs` value is a power of 2. If the `multiplier_abs` value is not a power of 2, the code will fall through to the `else" GCC,riscv,567,"The next statement of this code snippet is: pat = gen_rtx_fmt_e ( code , mode , op1 ) ;" GCC,riscv,568,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `emit_insn (gen_rtx_SET (op0, pat));` This statement is executed if the `code` is not a unary operation (i.e., if `GET_RTX_CLASS (code) != RTX_UNARY`). It generates an `rtx_SET` instruction with the `op0` and `pat` operands, and emits it as an instruction." GCC,riscv,569,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `frame->mask = mask;`" GCC,riscv,570,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `if ( SMALL_OPERAND ( - constant_frame ) ) {` This is because the `if` statement is checking whether the constant frame is a small operand, and if it is, it will execute the code inside the `if` block." GCC,riscv,571,"The next statement of this code snippet is: * op0 = gen_rtx_ZERO_EXTEND ( word_mode , * op0 ) ; Explanation: The code snippet is checking if the condition `unsigned_condition ( code ) == code` is true, and if the mode of `* op0` is `QImode` and if `* op0` is not a promoted variable. If all these conditions are true, then it sets `* op0` to a zero-extended version of itself, and if `* op1` is" GCC,riscv,572,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the values of various variables and the specific implementation of the `fprintf` function. However, based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the next statement will be a call to `fprintf` with the `asm_out_file` file pointer and a string literal as arguments. The string literal is likely to be one of the `` placeholders in the code snippet, but it is not possible to determine which one without more information about the code." GCC,riscv,573,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `if ( TARGET_RVC ) {`" GCC,riscv,574,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `if ( TARGET_RVC ) {`" GCC,riscv,575,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `n = riscv_flatten_aggregate_field ( TREE_TYPE ( f ) , fields , n , pos , ignore_zero_width_bit_field_p ) ;` This statement is part of the `else` block of the `if` statement that checks if the field is a bit field and has a zero width. If the field is not a bit field or has a non-zero width, the `else` block is executed, and the `riscv_flatten_aggregate_field` function is called" GCC,riscv,576,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific values of the variables and the behavior of the functions being called. However, based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the next statement will be: `th_mempair_save_restore_regs(operands, load_p, word_mode);` This is because the `th_mempair_prepare_save_restore_operands` function is called with the `operands` array, `load_p`, `word_mode`, `reg" GCC,riscv,577,"The next statement in this code snippet is: `riscv_save_restore_reg(mode, regno, offset, fn);` This statement is inside a loop that iterates over the floating-point registers, and it calls the `riscv_save_restore_reg` function with the current register number, the offset of the register in the stack frame, and the function pointer `fn`. The `riscv_save_restore_reg` function is responsible for saving or restoring the register value, depending on the value of `fn`." GCC,riscv,578,"The next statement is likely to be: `info->num_gprs = ;` This is because the previous statement is a `switch` statement, and the `default` case is not taken, so the next statement to be executed is the one following the `switch` statement." GCC,riscv,579,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be: `bitmap_set_bit ( components, offset ) ;` This is because the code is checking if the function has a frame pointer and if the offset of the frame pointer is constant. If it is, then it sets the bit in the `components` bitmap at the offset." GCC,riscv,580,"The next statement after the given code snippet is: `return components;` The code snippet is part of a function that is calculating the set of registers that are used in a function. It is using a bitmap to represent the set of registers, and the code is iterating over the registers and setting the corresponding bit in the bitmap if the register is used in the function. The function is also checking if the frame pointer and return address registers are used, and if so, it is clearing the corresponding bits in the bitmap. Finally, the function is returning the bitmap that represents the set of used registers." GCC,riscv,581,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `if ( ! TARGET_64BIT && TARGET_ZDINX ) {`" GCC,riscv,582,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `if ( lmul != ) return ( ( regno % lmul ) == ) ;` This statement checks if the value of `lmul` is not equal to ``, and if it is not, it returns the result of the expression `( regno % lmul ) == `." GCC,riscv,583,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `if ( regno == VTYPE_REGNUM || regno == VL_REGNUM ) return ;` This statement checks if the register number is equal to the register number of the vector type or the vector length register. If it is, it returns a constant value." GCC,riscv,584,"The code snippet is calculating the offset between two registers, `src` and `dest`, based on the values of `to` and `from`. The `riscv_compute_frame_info` function is called to initialize the `cfun->machine->frame` structure, which contains information about the current function's stack frame. The `if` statements check the values of `to` and `from`, and set `dest` and `src` accordingly. If `to` is equal to `HARD_FRAME_POINTER_REGNUM`, `dest` is set to the" GCC,riscv,585,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be: `src = cfun -> machine -> frame . frame_pointer_offset;` This is because the `if` statement checks whether the `from` variable is equal to the `FRAME_POINTER_REGNUM` constant, and if it is, it sets the `src` variable to the `frame_pointer_offset` field of the `machine` structure. If the `if` statement is not true, then the `src` variable is not set and the next statement will be the one after the `if` statement" GCC,riscv,586,"The next statement in the code snippet is likely to be: set_optab_libfunc(gt_optab, HFmode, NULL); This is because the previous statements in the code snippet are all setting the library functions for various operations (multiplication, negation, subtraction, equality, inequality, less than, and less than or equal to) for the HFmode (half-precision floating-point) type. The next logical step would be to set the library function for the greater than operation (gt_optab) for the same type." GCC,riscv,587,"The code snippet is checking if a given register number (`regno`) is one of the registers used for exception handling. The registers used for exception handling are stored in the `EH_RETURN_DATA_REGNO` array, which is accessed using the loop variable `i`. The first part of the code checks if the `calls_eh_return` flag is set to `true`. If it is, the function returns `false`. This means that if the `calls_eh_return` flag is set to `true`, the function will not check the registers used for exception handling." GCC,riscv,588,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `if ( MEM_P ( dest ) && ! riscv_legitimate_address_p ( mode , XEXP ( dest , ) , reload_completed ) ) { XEXP ( dest , ) = riscv_force_address ( XEXP ( dest , ) , mode ) ; }` This statement checks if the destination operand is a memory operand and if the address of the memory operand is not legitimate for the current" GCC,riscv,589,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `if ( GET_CODE ( src ) == CONST_INT ) {` This is because the code checks whether the `src` operand is a constant integer, and if so, it performs some additional processing on the constant. If the `src` operand is not a constant integer, the code falls through to the `else` clause and executes the statement `reg = force_reg ( mode , src ) ;`." GCC,riscv,590,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `if ( div_factor != ) riscv_expand_op ( LSHIFTRT , mode , tmp , tmp , gen_int_mode ( exact_log2 ( div_factor ) , QImode ) ) ;` This statement is part of the `else` clause of the previous `if` statement, which checks if `div_factor` is equal to ``. If it is not equal, then the code inside the `else` clause is executed, which includes the `" GCC,riscv,591,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `if ( div_factor != ) riscv_expand_op ( LSHIFTRT , mode , tmp , tmp , gen_int_mode ( exact_log2 ( div_factor ) , QImode ) ) ;` This statement is executed if the `div_factor` variable is not equal to ``. The `riscv_expand_op` function is called with the `LSHIFTRT` operation, the `mode` variable, `tmp` as the first" GCC,riscv,592,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `if (might_split_p) { ... }` This is because the previous `if` statement sets `might_split_p` to `false` if the condition is not met, and the `else` clause is not executed. Therefore, if the condition is not met, the `if` statement will not be executed, and the next statement will be the `if (might_split_p) { ... }` statement." GCC,riscv,593,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `const char * res = TYPE_NAME ( type ) ;` This statement assigns the result of the `TYPE_NAME` function, which returns a string representation of the type, to the variable `res`." GCC,riscv,594,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return ;` The first `if` statement checks if the type is a real type and has a specific precision, and if so, returns a string literal. If the type is not a real type or does not have the specified precision, the second `if` statement checks if the type has a name, and if so, the function returns the name of the type." GCC,riscv,595,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific values of the variables and the behavior of the functions called. However, based on the code snippet you provided, it appears that the next statement will be: `codes[i].value = trunc_int_for_mode(codes[i].value, mode);` This is because the loop is currently executing the `if` block, and the next statement after the `if` block is the assignment to `codes[i].value`." GCC,riscv,596,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `x = GEN_INT(codes[].value);` This is because the `if` statement that follows the `else` clause is only executed if `can_create_pseudo` is true and `num_ops` is greater than a certain value (which is not specified in the code snippet). If `can_create_pseudo` is false or `num_ops` is not greater than the certain value, then the `else` clause is executed, and the statement `x = GEN_INT" GCC,riscv,597,"The code snippet is a function that returns the next available register number for a given limit and a bitset. The function takes three arguments: `inc`, `regno`, and `limit`. The function starts by checking if `inc` is non-zero. If it is, it increments `regno` by 1. Then, it enters a loop that runs as long as `regno` is less than or equal to `limit`. Inside the loop, the function checks if the bit at position `regno - GP_REG_FIRST` in the bitset `cf" GCC,riscv,598,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `if ( src_code == MEM ) switch ( width ) { case : return ; case : return ; case : return ; } }` This is because the code snippet is checking the `src_code` and `dest_code` to determine the type of operation being performed, and the `width` of the operation. If the `src_code` is `MEM" GCC,riscv,599,"The next statement after the `if` block in the code snippet you provided is: `return false;` This statement is executed if the `if` condition is true, which means that the `info.num_fprs` field is non-zero. In this case, the function `riscv_get_arg_info` returns `false`, indicating that the argument is not a floating-point register." GCC,riscv,600,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `asm_fprintf ( file , , reg_names [ REGNO ( op ) ] ) ;` This statement is part of the `case 'v'` block, which handles the case where the operand is a vector register. The statement prints the register name of the operand using the `reg_names` array, which contains the names of the vector registers. The `REGNO` macro is used to get the register number of the operand, and the `asm_fprintf` function is used to print" GCC,riscv,601,"The code snippet you provided is part of a function that is initializing a stack frame for a function. The code is using a number of variables and functions that are not defined in the snippet you provided, so it's difficult to give a precise prediction of what the next statement will be. However, based on the context, it appears that the code is iterating over the floating-point registers in the function's stack frame and setting their values to some default value. Based on the code you provided, it's possible that the next statement will be something like: ``` offset += UNITS" GCC,riscv,602,"The next statement after the `if` block is: `unsignedp = * punsignedp;` This statement assigns the value of `*punsignedp` to the variable `unsignedp`." GCC,riscv,603,"The next statement after the code snippet you provided is likely to be the assignment of the `mode` variable to the `PROMOTE_MODE` function, which is a GCC built-in function that promotes a mode to a wider mode. Here's the full code snippet with the next statement added: ``` PROMOTE_MODE ( as_a < scalar_mode > ( mode ) , unsignedp , type ) ; * punsignedp = unsignedp ; return mode ; ``` In this code, the `PROMOTE_MODE` function is called" GCC,riscv,604,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return BYTES_PER_RISCV_VECTOR;`" GCC,riscv,605,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return BYTES_PER_RISCV_VECTOR;`" GCC,riscv,606,"The next statement after the code snippet you provided is likely to be the initialization of the register file, which is a data structure that stores the values of the machine's registers. In the GNU Compiler Collection (GCC), the register file is implemented as a hash table, and the `init_regs` function is responsible for initializing it. This function is called after the machine modes have been initialized, which is why it appears after the `reinit_regs` function in the code snippet you provided. Therefore, the next statement after the code snippet you provided is likely to be a" GCC,riscv,607,"The next statement after `init_derived_machine_modes ( ) ; reinit_regs ( ) ;` is likely to be `init_regs ( ) ;`, which initializes the registers of the machine." GCC,riscv,608,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `inform` function and the values of the input parameters. However, based on the syntax and the fact that the `inform` function is being called with three string literals as arguments, it is likely that the next statement will be a call to the `inform` function with the same three string literals as arguments. Here is an example of what the next statement might look like: ``` inform ( input_location , ""Hello"", ""World"", ""!"" )" GCC,riscv,609,The next statement after the `else` block in this code snippet is the `return` statement. The `return` statement will return the value of the expression `default_scalar_mode_supported_p ( mode )` to the caller of the function. GCC,riscv,610,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return default_scalar_mode_supported_p ( mode );` This statement is executed if the `mode` parameter is not equal to `HFmode`. The `default_scalar_mode_supported_p` function is called with the `mode` parameter as an argument, and its return value is returned by the `riscv_scalar_mode_supported_p` function." GCC,riscv,611,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet without knowing the specific implementation of the `riscv_secondary_memory_needed` function. However, based on the function signature and the fact that it is a static function, it is likely that the next statement will be a check or calculation related to the `mode`, `class1`, and `class2` parameters. Without more information, it is not possible to provide a more specific answer. If you have access to the implementation of the `riscv_secondary_memory_needed` function, you may be able to determine" GCC,riscv,612,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return ( ! riscv_v_ext_vector_mode_p ( mode ) && GET_MODE_SIZE ( mode ) . to_constant ( ) > UNITS_PER_WORD && ( class1 == FP_REGS ) != ( class2 == FP_REGS ) && ! TARGET_XTHEADFMV ) ;` This statement is a return statement that returns a boolean value indicating whether the secondary memory is needed for the given machine mode, register class, and target architecture. The return value is determined" GCC,riscv,613,"The next statement is: `gp_saved = MAX_ARGS_IN_REGISTERS - local_cum.num_gprs;`" GCC,riscv,614,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `gp_saved = MAX_ARGS_IN_REGISTERS - local_cum.num_gprs;`" GCC,riscv,615,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `for (unsigned int regno = GP_REG_FIRST; regno <= GP_REG_LAST; regno++) {` This line initializes the loop that iterates over the registers in the `components` bitmap. The loop starts at the first register in the `GP_REG_FIRST` register class and ends at the last register in the `GP_REG_LAST` register class. The loop increments the `regno` variable by 1 for each iteration." GCC,riscv,616,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `for (unsigned int regno = GP_REG_FIRST; regno <= GP_REG_LAST; regno++) {` This line initializes the loop that iterates over the registers in the `components` bitmap. The loop starts at the first register in the `GP_REG_FIRST` register class and ends at the last register in the `GP_REG_LAST` register class. The loop increments the `regno` variable by 1 for each iteration." GCC,riscv,617,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet without knowing the context and the purpose of the code. However, based on the code snippet provided, it appears to be related to the RISC-V instruction set architecture and the generation of machine code for a specific function. The code snippet defines a variable `slot_address` and assigns it the result of the `riscv_add_offset` function, which takes three arguments: `scratch`, `stack_pointer_rtx`, and `cfun->machine->frame.gp_sp_offset.to_constant()`." GCC,riscv,618,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return shamt == ctz_hwi ( mask );` This statement is a return statement that returns a boolean value indicating whether the `shamt` parameter is equal to the count of trailing zeros in the `mask` parameter. The `ctz_hwi` function is used to count the number of trailing zeros in the `mask` parameter, and the result is compared to the `shamt` parameter. If the two values are equal, the function returns `true`, otherwise it returns `false`." GCC,riscv,619,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return (shamt & mask) == mask;` This statement is a boolean expression that checks whether the `shamt` value and the `mask` value have any common bits set. If they do, the expression will evaluate to `true`, otherwise it will evaluate to `false`." GCC,riscv,620,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `emit_insn (gen_th_fmv_x_w (low_dest, src));` This statement emits an instruction to move the low word of `src` to `low_dest`." GCC,riscv,621,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `emit_insn (gen_th_fmv_x_w (low_dest, src));`" GCC,riscv,622,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `align = GET_MODE_ALIGNMENT(mode);` This is because the `if` statement checks whether `SYMBOL_REF_P(x)` is true, and if it is not, the code inside the `if` block is executed. Since `SYMBOL_REF_P(x)` is not true, the code inside the `if` block is executed, which sets `align` to `GET_MODE_ALIGNMENT(mode)`." GCC,riscv,623,"Based on the code snippet you provided, it appears that the next statement will be: `if (align < size) return false;` This is because the code is checking if the `align` variable is less than the `size` variable, and if it is, it will return `false`." GCC,riscv,624,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `if (GET_MODE_SIZE(mode).to_constant() > UNITS_PER_WORD && !SMALL_OPERAND(INTVAL(x) + GET_MODE_SIZE(mode).to_constant() - UNITS_PER_WORD)) return false;` This statement checks if the mode size of the operand is greater than the size of a word, and if the operand is not a small operand (i.e., it does not fit in a single word). If either of these conditions" GCC,riscv,625,"The next statement after the `if` statement is `return true;`. The `if` statement checks if the size of the mode is greater than the number of units per word, and if the operand is not a small operand. If the condition is true, the function returns false. If the condition is false, the function returns true. Therefore, the next statement after the `if` statement is the `return true;` statement, which returns a value of true from the function." GCC,riscv,626,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be a comparison or a mathematical operation involving the `min_size` variable. The `constant_lower_bound` function returns the lower bound of a constant as a `widest_int`, which is a type that can represent a wide range of integer values. The `to_poly_widest` function converts the `TYPE_SIZE` of the `type` variable to a `widest_int`. Therefore, the next statement of this code snippet is likely to be a comparison or a mathematical operation that involves the `min_size`" GCC,riscv,627,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `min_size = constant_lower_bound ( wi :: to_poly_widest ( TYPE_SIZE ( type ) ) ) ;` This statement is assigning the result of the `constant_lower_bound` function to the `min_size` variable, which is the minimum size of the type. The `constant_lower_bound` function returns the lower bound of a constant expression, which in this case is the size of the type. The `to_poly_widest` function is used to convert the type size to a" GCC,riscv,628,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return riscv_v_ext_vector_mode_p ( mode ) ;` This statement returns the result of the `riscv_v_ext_vector_mode_p` function, which is called with the `mode` parameter. The `riscv_v_ext_vector_mode_p` function is not defined in the code snippet you provided, so it is not possible to determine what it does or what value it returns. However, based on the name of the function, it is likely that it returns a boolean value indicating" GCC,riscv,629,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return mode_size;` This is because the `if` statement that checks if `mode_size` is greater than `BYTES_PER_RISCV_VECTOR` is not executed, so the `return` statement at the end of the function is reached and executed." GCC,riscv,630,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return mode_size;` Explanation: The `if` statement checks if `mode_size` is greater than `BYTES_PER_RISCV_VECTOR`. If it is, then `mode_size` is set to `BYTES_PER_RISCV_VECTOR`. Otherwise, `mode_size` is returned as is. So, the next statement after the `if` statement is to return `mode_size`." GCC,riscv,631,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return riscv_vector_chunks * scale;` This statement is executed if the `riscv_v_ext_vector_mode_p` function returns a non-zero value, indicating that the vector extension is enabled. In this case, the function returns the product of the number of vector chunks and the scale factor." GCC,riscv,632,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return riscv_vector_chunks * scale;` This statement is executed if the `riscv_v_ext_vector_mode_p` function returns a non-zero value, indicating that the vector extension is enabled. In this case, the function returns the product of the number of vector chunks and the scale factor." GCC,riscv,633,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet without knowing the specific implementation of the `riscv_v_adjust_precision` function. However, based on the function name and the parameters it takes, it appears to be related to adjusting the precision of a machine mode. Here are a few possible next statements that could occur in this function: 1. `if (scale > 0) {`: This statement could check if the `scale` parameter is greater than 0, and if so, it could adjust the precision of the machine mode accordingly. 2. `if" GCC,riscv,634,"The next statement of this code snippet is: insn = emit_insn (insn); This is because the previous line of code, `RTX_FRAME_RELATED_P (insn) = ;`, sets the `RTX_FRAME_RELATED_P` flag on the `insn` variable, which indicates that the instruction is related to the frame pointer. The `emit_insn` function is then called with `insn` as its argument, which emits the instruction to the assembly code." GCC,riscv,635,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `RTX_FRAME_RELATED_P (insn) = ;` This statement sets the `RTX_FRAME_RELATED_P` field of the `insn` variable to the value of ``. The `RTX_FRAME_RELATED_P` field is a flag that indicates whether the instruction is related to the frame pointer. The value of `` is a placeholder for a specific value that is" GCC,riscv,636,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet without knowing the specific implementation of the `riscv_v_ext_vector_mode_p` function. However, based on the name of the function, it appears to be checking whether a given machine mode is a vector mode. If this is the case, the next statement of the code snippet is likely to be a comparison of the `mode` parameter with a set of predefined vector modes, such as `V2S`, `V4S`, `V8S`, etc. The function may then return a boolean value indicating whether the given" GCC,riscv,637,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the `default` case is executed when none of the other cases match the value of `mode`. The behavior of the code will depend on the value of `mode` and the statements within the `default` case." GCC,riscv,638,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be: `zeroed_hardregs = need_zeroed_hardregs;` This statement is assigning the value of `need_zeroed_hardregs` to `zeroed_hardregs`." GCC,riscv,639,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `zeroed_hardregs |= default_zero_call_used_regs ( need_zeroed_hardregs & ~ zeroed_hardregs ) ;` This statement updates the `zeroed_hardregs` variable by setting its bits that correspond to the registers that need to be zeroed, but are not already zeroed. The `default_zero_call_used_regs` function is used to determine which registers need to be zeroed, and the `need_zeroed_hardregs` variable" GCC,riscv,640,"The next statement is: `rtx target = regno_reg_rtx [ regno ] ;` This line is setting the `target` variable to the register with the number `regno` in the `regno_reg_rtx` array. The `regno_reg_rtx` array is an array of `rtx` objects, where each element represents a register. The `regno` variable is the index of the register in the array." GCC,riscv,641,"Based on the code snippet you provided, it appears to be part of a function that is generating code for a register allocation problem. The function is iterating through a set of registers and checking if they are available for use. If a register is available, it is used to generate a new register. The next statement of the code snippet you provided is: `if (emitted_vlmax_vsetvl) {` This statement checks if the variable `emitted_vlmax_vsetvl` is true. If it is true, then the code inside the if statement will be executed" GCC,riscv,642,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be the first line of the function body, which is: ``` int cost = 0; ``` This line initializes the `cost` variable to 0, which is the default cost for an address. The function will then proceed to calculate the actual cost of the address based on the `addr` and `mode` parameters, and return the result." GCC,riscv,643,"The next statement after the `if` block is: `n += ( GET_MODE_SIZE ( mode ) + UNITS_PER_WORD - ) / UNITS_PER_WORD ;` This statement is executed if the `if` condition is true, which means that `mode` is not equal to `BLKmode` and `might_split_p` is true. The statement adds the result of the expression `( GET_MODE_SIZE ( mode ) + UNITS_PER_WORD - " GCC,riscv,644,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the `riscv_classify_address` function is not known. However, based on the name of the function and the arguments being passed to it, it appears to be a function that classifies an address based on certain criteria. If the function returns `true`, the next statement of the code snippet will be executed. If the function returns `false`, the code will jump to the statement labeled ``. Without more information about the specific implementation of the `riscv" GCC,riscv,645,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `riscv_force_temporary` function and the values of the `temp`, `high`, and `reg` variables. However, based on the names of the variables and the function being called, it is likely that the next statement will involve the creation of a new temporary variable or the modification of an existing one. The `riscv_force_temporary` function is likely to be used to create a new temporary variable or to modify an existing one, and the `" GCC,riscv,646,"The next statement of the code snippet is: `dwarf = alloc_reg_note ( REG_CFA_RESTORE , reg , dwarf ) ;` This statement is part of the loop that iterates over the registers saved in the stack frame, and it creates a new register note for each register that is restored from the stack frame. The register note is used to update the DWARF information for the register." GCC,riscv,647,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `adjust_sp_rtx = gen_rtx_PLUS (Pmode, stack_pointer_rtx, GEN_INT (saved_size));` This statement is adding the value of `saved_size` to the stack pointer register `stack_pointer_rtx` and storing the result in the `adjust_sp_rtx` variable. The `GEN_INT` function is used to create a constant integer value, which is then added to the stack pointer register using the `PLUS` operator." GCC,riscv,648,"Based on the code snippet you provided, it appears to be part of a function that is adjusting the stack pointer for a libcall. The code is iterating through the general purpose registers (GP_REG_FIRST to GP_REG_LAST) and checking if they are set in the frame mask. If a register is set, it is adjusting the stack pointer based on the register number and the saved_size variable. The next statement of the code snippet you provided is: mem = gen_rtx_MEM ( SImode , plus_constant ( Pmode , stack" GCC,riscv,649,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `riscv_get_arg_info` function and the values of the variables `arg`, `cum`, `mode`, `type`, and `named`. However, based on the name of the function and the parameters passed to it, it is likely that the next statement will be related to retrieving information about the arguments of a function. Without more information about the specific implementation of the `riscv_get_arg_info` function, it is not possible to provide a" GCC,riscv,650,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `riscv_get_arg_info` function and the values of the variables `arg`, `cum`, `mode`, `type`, and `named`. However, based on the name of the function and the parameters passed to it, it is likely that the next statement will be related to retrieving information about the arguments of a function. Without more information about the specific implementation of the `riscv_get_arg_info` function, it is not possible to provide a" GCC,riscv,651,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `shifted_val = value << shift;` This statement shifts the value of `value` to the left by `shift` bits, and assigns the result to `shifted_val`." GCC,riscv,652,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific values of the variables and the behavior of the functions called. However, based on the code snippet, it appears that the next statement will be: `cost = alt_cost;` This is because the code snippet is checking whether the cost of the alternative code sequence is less than the current cost, and if so, it updates the cost and the code sequence. If the alternative cost is not less than the current cost, then the code will continue to the next statement, which is not shown in the code" GCC,riscv,653,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `if ( SMALL_OPERAND ( INTVAL ( offset ) ) && riscv_symbol_insns ( type ) > ) return true ;` This statement is inside the `if ( riscv_symbolic_constant_p ( base , & type ) )` block, and it checks if the offset is a small operand and if the number of instructions required to load the symbol is less than or equal to the number of literal instructions. If both conditions are true, the function returns `true`." GCC,riscv,654,"The next statement after the `switch` statement is the `default` case, which means that the value of `code` is not equal to any of the cases `LE`, `LEU`, or `LT`. Therefore, the next statement will be the one inside the `default` case, which is `break;`." GCC,riscv,655,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `if (INTVAL(*cmp1) < plus_one) {`" GCC,riscv,656,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be a `return` statement, as the function `riscv_can_use_return_insn` is declared to return a `bool` value. The function checks whether the reload has completed and whether the total size of the stack frame is equal to a certain value (represented by ``). If both conditions are true, the function returns `true`, otherwise it returns `false`. Therefore, the next statement of this code snippet is likely to be: ``` return (reload_completed && cfun" GCC,riscv,657,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific inputs and the behavior of the `riscv_valid_base_register_p` function. However, based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the next statement will be: `info -> type = ADDRESS_REG ;` This is because the code is currently in the `PLUS` case, and the next statement is to set the `type` field of the `info` structure to `ADDRESS_REG`." GCC,riscv,658,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific values of the variables and the behavior of the functions being called. However, based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the next statement will be: `info -> offset = const0_rtx ;` This is because the previous statement, `info -> type = ADDRESS_REG ;`, sets the `type` field of the `info` structure to `ADDRESS_REG`, which indicates that the `info` structure is being used to represent a register. The next statement, `" GCC,riscv,659,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return riscv_hard_regno_nregs(GP_REG_FIRST, mode);` This statement is executed if the condition `reg_class_subset_p(GR_REGS, rclass)` is true, which means that the register class `GR_REGS` is a subset of the register class `rclass`. The function `riscv_hard_regno_nregs` returns the number of registers in the register class `GP_REG_FIRST` for the specified mode." GCC,riscv,660,"The next statement is: `offset += RISCV_STACK_ALIGN ( cfun->machine->varargs_size ) ;` This statement adds the size of the variable arguments to the current offset, which is the total size of the stack frame. The `RISCV_STACK_ALIGN` macro is used to ensure that the offset is aligned to the stack boundary." GCC,riscv,661,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `reg_names[16] = ""ft0"";`" GCC,riscv,662,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return get_section(name, s->named.common.flags, NULL);` This statement returns the result of the `get_section` function, which is called with the `name` argument, the `s->named.common.flags` argument, and the `NULL` argument. The `get_section` function is not defined in the code snippet you provided, so it is not possible to determine what it does or what it returns." GCC,riscv,663,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `* code = EQ ;`" GCC,riscv,664,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `*invert_ptr = !*invert_ptr;`" GCC,riscv,665,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `if ( use_restore_libcall ) frame -> mask = ;` This statement sets the `mask` field of the `frame` structure to a specific value, which is represented by the placeholder ``. The value of this placeholder is not specified in the code snippet you provided, so it could be any integer value." GCC,riscv,666,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `if ( ( frame -> mask | frame -> fmask ) != ) {` This is a conditional statement that checks whether the `mask` or `fmask` field of the `frame` structure is not equal to ``. If the condition is true, the code inside the `if` block will be executed." GCC,riscv,667,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `RTX_FRAME_RELATED_P (emit_insn (insn)) = ;` This statement sets the `RTX_FRAME_RELATED_P` flag of the instruction `insn` to ``. The `RTX_FRAME_RELATED_P` flag is used to indicate that the instruction is related to the frame pointer, and `` is a placeholder for a specific value that is not" GCC,riscv,668,"The next statement of this code snippet is: * op0 = gen_rtx_ZERO_EXTEND ( word_mode , * op0 ) ; This is because the code is checking if the mode size of the word mode is greater than the mode size of the mode of op0, and if the condition is true, it will zero-extend the value in op0 to the word mode." GCC,riscv,669,"The next statement of this code snippet is: * op1 = gen_rtx_SIGN_EXTEND ( word_mode , * op1 ) ;" GCC,riscv,670,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the program depends on the specific implementation of the `default_file_start` function and the input data. However, based on the name of the function, it is likely that it is a function that initializes or sets up the default file for the program. The `default_file_start` function may perform tasks such as creating a new file, setting the file name and path, and opening the file for reading or writing. Without more information about the specific implementation of the `default_file" GCC,riscv,671,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `default_file_start ( );`" GCC,riscv,672,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return frame->total_size % IMM_REACH;` This is because the `if` statement is checking several conditions, and if all of them are true, the code will execute the `return` statement. If any of the conditions are false, the code will not execute the `return` statement and will continue to the next statement. In this case, the `if` statement is checking that the following conditions are true: * `! SMALL_OPERAND (frame->total_size - max_first" GCC,riscv,673,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `riscv_flatten_aggregate_field` function and the values of the `type`, `fields`, and `` arguments. However, based on the name of the function and the arguments passed to it, it is likely that the next statement will be a call to a function that flattens the aggregate field of the specified type and returns the flattened field." GCC,riscv,674,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be: `return riscv_flatten_aggregate_field ( type , fields , , ) ;` This is because the `if` statement checks if `type` is not a `RECORD_TYPE`, and if it is not, it returns a negative value. If `type` is a `RECORD_TYPE`, then the function `riscv_flatten_aggregate_field` is called with the `type`, `fields`, and two integer literals" GCC,riscv,675,"The next statement of the code snippet is: `gcc_assert ( n_elts >= ) ;` This is a precondition check to ensure that the number of elements in the array is greater than or equal to a certain value, which is represented by ``. If this condition is not met, the function will abort with an assertion failure." GCC,riscv,676,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `fields[n].type = TREE_TYPE(type);` This is because the code is currently inside the `case COMPLEX_TYPE:` block, and the next statement after the `if (elt_size <= UNITS_PER_FP_ARG)` check is the assignment of the `type` field of the `fields[n]` struct." GCC,riscv,677,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return x;` Explanation: The `riscv_force_address` function takes two arguments: `x`, which is an rtx expression, and `mode`, which is an enum machine_mode. The function checks if `x` is a legitimate address for the given `mode` by calling the `riscv_legitimate_address_p` function. If `x` is not a legitimate address, the function forces `x` to be a register by calling the `force_reg` function with `P" GCC,riscv,678,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be a call to the `rtx_code` function, which is used to generate a new `rtx` object representing the binary operation specified by the `code` parameter. The `rtx_code` function takes two arguments: the first is the `mode` parameter, which specifies the machine mode of the operation, and the second is the `code` parameter, which specifies the type of binary operation to perform. Here is an example of what the next statement of this code snippet might look like: ``` rtx_code(mode" GCC,riscv,679,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `riscv_emit_move(dest, value);`" GCC,riscv,680,"The next statement after the `if` statement in the code snippet you provided is the `else` block. Within the `else` block, the code emits a move instruction to move the value from the `value` register to the `dest` register. Then, it returns the `dest` register. So, the next statement after the `if` statement is: ``` riscv_emit_move ( dest , value ) ; ```" GCC,riscv,681,"The next statement in the code snippet is: offset -= UNITS_PER_WORD; This is because the code is currently in the first for loop, which is iterating over the general-purpose registers. The current register being processed is regno, and the code is checking if it is set in the cfun->machine->frame.mask bitset. If it is, the code saves or restores the register using the riscv_save_restore_reg function, and then subtracts UNITS_PER_WORD from the offset. The next statement in the code" GCC,riscv,682,"The next statement after the `return` statement in the code snippet you provided is the end of the function. The `return` statement is used to return a value from a function, and in this case, it is returning the value of the `riscv_get_arg_info` function, which is called with the specified arguments. The `riscv_get_arg_info` function is not defined in the code snippet you provided, so it is not possible to determine what it does or what value it returns. However, based on the name of the function, it is likely that it returns" GCC,riscv,683,"The next statement of this code snippet is: return riscv_get_arg_info ( & info , cum , mode , type , named , false ) ; This statement calls the function riscv_get_arg_info with the given arguments and returns the result. The function riscv_get_arg_info is not defined in the code snippet provided, so it is not possible to determine what it does or what it returns." GCC,riscv,684,"The next statement after the code snippet you provided is: `return alignment;`" GCC,riscv,685,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return true;` Explanation: The `riscv_function_ok_for_sibcall` function takes two tree arguments, `decl` and `exp`, but they are not used in this particular code snippet. The function checks if the target is set to save and restore registers, and if so, it returns the result of the `riscv_leaf_function_p` function. If the target is not set to save and restore registers, the function returns `true`. Therefore, the next statement of this code snippet is to" GCC,riscv,686,"The next statement after the code snippet you provided is: `return args;`" GCC,riscv,687,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be: `rtx riscv_function_value ( const_tree type , const_tree func , enum machine_mode mode ) { struct riscv_arg_info info ; CUMULATIVE_ARGS args ; if ( type ) { int unsigned_p = TYPE_UNSIGNED ( type ) ; mode = TYPE_MODE ( type ) ; mode = promote_function_mode ( type , mode , & unsigned_p , func , ) ;` This is because the code snippet" GCC,riscv,688,"Based on the code snippet provided, it is difficult to predict the next statement with certainty. However, based on the context and the code structure, it is likely that the next statement will be a case statement or a switch statement that handles different cases for the number of floating-point registers used for the function call. The statement is likely to check the number of floating-point registers used and generate the appropriate register allocation for the function call." GCC,riscv,689,"Based on the code snippet you provided, it appears to be part of a function that is handling the passing of arguments to a function call. The function is setting up information about the arguments, including their types and offsets, and is checking whether they can be passed in registers or not. The next statement of the code snippet you provided is: if ( ( info -> num_fprs = riscv_pass_mode_in_fpr_p ( mode ) ) && info -> fpr_offset + info -> num_fprs <= MAX_ARGS_IN_REGISTERS" GCC,riscv,690,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `if ( GET_MODE_CLASS ( mode ) != MODE_FLOAT && GET_MODE_CLASS ( mode ) != MODE_COMPLEX_FLOAT ) return false ;` This statement checks if the mode of the register is not a floating-point or complex floating-point mode, and if it is not, it returns false." GCC,riscv,691,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `if (GP_REG_P(regno + nregs - )) return false;` This statement is part of the `if (GP_REG_P(regno))` block, which checks if the register number is a general-purpose register. If the register number is a general-purpose register, the code checks if the next `nregs - ` registers are also general-purpose registers. If they are not, the function returns `false`." GCC,riscv,692,"The next statement of this code snippet is: return (GET_MODE_SIZE(mode) + UNITS_PER_FP_REG - ) / UNITS_PER_FP_REG; This statement is the return value of the function, which is calculated based on the mode size, the number of units per FP register, and a literal value (). The calculation is performed using integer arithmetic, and the result is rounded down to the nearest integer by dividing by UNITS_PER_FP_REG." GCC,riscv,693,"The code snippet you provided is a C function named `riscv_leaf_function_p` that takes no arguments. It appears to be part of a larger program that is using the RISC-V instruction set architecture. The function first checks the value of `cfun->machine->is_leaf`, which is a field in a structure that represents the current function being compiled. If the value is equal to ``, the function sets the value of `cfun->machine->is_leaf` to the result of the `leaf_function_p` function, which is a" GCC,riscv,694,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet without knowing the specific implementation of the `riscv_legitimate_address_p` function and the values of the `mode`, `x`, and `strict_p` parameters. However, based on the name of the function and the parameters it takes, it appears to be a function that checks whether a given address is a legitimate address for a particular machine mode. The function likely takes the address to be checked as an input, and returns a boolean value indicating whether the address is legitimate or not. The `mode` parameter is likely" GCC,riscv,695,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be a call to a function that initializes the `addr` structure with the appropriate values. Without knowing the specifics of the function being called, it is difficult to predict exactly what the next statement will be. However, it is likely that the function will initialize the `addr` structure with values that are used to specify the address of a memory location or a peripheral device." GCC,riscv,696,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `if ( GET_CODE ( x ) == PLUS && CONST_INT_P ( XEXP ( x , ) ) && INTVAL ( XEXP ( x , ) ) != ) {` This is a conditional statement that checks if the expression `x` is a `PLUS` expression with a constant integer operand, and if the integer operand is not equal to ``. If the condition is true, the" GCC,riscv,697,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be: `riscv_emit_move(dest, riscv_legitimize_tls_address(src));` This is because the code checks if `src` is a TLS symbol using `riscv_tls_symbol_p(src)`, and if it is, it emits a move instruction to move the TLS address into `dest`." GCC,riscv,698,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `riscv_emit_move(dest, force_reg(mode, src));` This statement emits a move instruction that moves the value of `src` to `dest`, using the `force_reg` function to ensure that `src` is a register operand. The `return true;` statement is not executed in this case, since the `if` condition is not satisfied." GCC,riscv,699,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `riscv_emit_move ( dest , force_reg ( mode , src ) ) ;` This statement is executed if both `register_operand ( dest , mode )` and `reg_or_0_operand ( src , mode )` are false, which means that `dest` is not a register operand and `src` is not a register operand or a constant zero. In this case, the function `force_reg` is called to convert `src` into a register operand, and then the function `ris" GCC,riscv,700,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `if (might_split_p) {`" GCC,riscv,701,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return riscv_address_insns(XEXP(mem, ), mode, might_split_p);` This statement is a function call to `riscv_address_insns`, which is a function that returns the number of instructions needed to load a memory address. The function takes three arguments: * `XEXP(mem, )`: This is the memory address to be loaded. * `mode`: This is the mode of the memory access (e.g" GCC,riscv,702,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `tune_info` structure and the `memory_move_secondary_cost` function. However, based on the context and the syntax of the code, it is likely that the next statement will be a call to the `memory_move_secondary_cost` function, which is used to calculate the cost of moving data between different memory locations. The `memory_move_secondary_cost` function takes three arguments: `mode`, `rclass`, and `in" GCC,riscv,703,"The next statement of this code snippet is: x = GEN_INT(codes[].value); Explanation: The code snippet is part of a function that is generating instructions for a RISC-V processor. The function is checking if a certain condition is met, and if it is not, it is generating a specific instruction. The next statement is to set the value of the variable ""x"" to the value of the ""value"" field of the ""codes"" array at index ." GCC,riscv,704,"It's difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet without knowing the specific values of the variables and the implementation of the functions being called. However, based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the next statement will be: x = riscv_emit_set(temp, x); This is because the code is currently in a loop, and the loop condition is ""i < num_ops"". The loop will continue to execute until this condition is no longer true, which means that the next statement will be the one that is executed after the loop. The loop is iterating over the """ GCC,riscv,705,"Based on the code snippet provided, it is difficult to predict the next statement with certainty. However, based on the context and the syntax of the code, it is likely that the next statement will be a continuation of the current statement, possibly setting a variable or calling a function. The code snippet appears to be part of a compiler or interpreter for a programming language, and it is setting various options and flags for the target platform. The code is using a number of macros and variables that are defined elsewhere in the codebase, so it is not possible to provide a more specific prediction without more context." GCC,riscv,706,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the values of various variables and the specific implementation of the RISC-V architecture. However, we can make some educated guesses based on the information provided: 1. The next statement is likely to be a call to the `riscv_init_machine_status` function, as it is assigned to the `init_machine_status` variable. 2. The `riscv_branch_cost` variable is assigned a value based on the `tune_info` variable, which is determined" GCC,riscv,707,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the code depends on the specific values of the variables and the functions called. However, based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the next statement will be a call to the `emit_insn` function, passing in a generated instruction that adds a value to a register. The value to be added is either a constant or a register, depending on the value of the `delta` variable. The instruction is generated using the `gen_add3_insn` function, which takes three arguments: the first is" GCC,riscv,708,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `error ( , cpu_string ) ;` This statement is executed if the `strcmp` function returns a non-zero value, indicating that the `cpu_string` does not match any of the CPU names in the `riscv_cpu_info_table`. The `error` function is called with a string literal and the `cpu_string` as arguments, which will print an error message to the console." GCC,riscv,709,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return NULL;` Explanation: The `riscv_parse_cpu` function is searching for a match between the `cpu_string` argument and the `name` field of the `riscv_cpu_info` struct in the `riscv_cpu_info_table` array. If no match is found, the function returns `NULL`. The code snippet you provided is part of a loop that iterates over the elements of the `riscv_cpu_info_table` array. The loop starts at index `<" GCC,riscv,710,"The next statement of this code snippet is: num_float += SCALAR_FLOAT_TYPE_P ( fields [ i ] . type ); This statement adds the number of scalar float types in the fields array to the num_float variable. The loop will continue until all the fields have been processed, and the final value of num_float will be the total number of scalar float types in the fields array." GCC,riscv,711,"The code snippet you provided is a C function that takes two arguments: `type` and `fields`. It appears to be flattening an aggregate argument, which is a data structure that contains multiple values of different types. The function first calls `riscv_flatten_aggregate_argument` to flatten the aggregate argument, which returns an integer value representing the number of elements in the flattened argument. The function then loops through the elements of the flattened argument, starting from the second element (index 1), and checks if each element is a scalar float type. If any element" GCC,riscv,712,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be: `return info;` This is because the `riscv_get_arg_info` function is called with the address of the `info` structure as an argument, and the function is expected to populate the structure with information about the argument. The `return` statement is then used to return the populated structure to the caller." GCC,riscv,713,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `info.cumulative_args = cum;`" GCC,riscv,714,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return gen_rtx_PARALLEL ( mode , gen_rtvec ( , gen_rtx_EXPR_LIST ( VOIDmode , gen_rtx_REG ( mode1 , regno1 ) , GEN_INT ( offset1 ) ) , gen_rtx_EXPR_LIST ( VOIDmode , gen_rtx_REG ( mode2 , regno2 ) , GEN_INT ( offset2 ) ) ) ) ;` This statement is a return" GCC,riscv,715,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `static rtx riscv_pass_fpr_pair ( enum machine_mode mode , unsigned regno1 , enum machine_mode mode1 , HOST_WIDE_INT offset1 , unsigned regno2 , enum machine_mode mode2 , HOST_WIDE_INT offset2 ) {` This is the beginning of a function definition in C, which declares a function named `riscv_pass_fpr_pair` that takes six parameters: `mode`, `regno1`, `mode1`, `offset1" GCC,riscv,716,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return riscv_gen_reg_rtx (type_mode, regno, value_mode);`" GCC,riscv,717,"The code snippet you provided is a function that generates a register expression for a floating-point register. The function takes three arguments: * `type_mode`: the machine mode of the type of the register * `regno`: the register number * `value_mode`: the machine mode of the value being stored in the register The function first generates a register expression for the register using the `gen_rtx_REG` function. If the `type_mode` and `value_mode` arguments are not equal, the function generates an expression list with the register expression and a constant zero expression" GCC,riscv,718,"The next statement in this code snippet is: fprintf ( file , , reg_names [ REGNO ( op ) ] ) ; This is because the code is currently inside the case REG block, and the next statement after the if statement is the fprintf statement." GCC,riscv,719,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `if (letter && letter != 'z') output_operand_lossage(, letter);` This statement checks if the `letter` variable is not null and not equal to 'z', and if so, it calls the `output_operand_lossage` function with the `STR_LIT` and `letter` arguments." GCC,riscv,720,"The next statement after the `switch` statement is the `default` case, which is an unreachable statement. This means that the code will never reach this point, and the program will crash if it does. The `gcc_unreachable()` function is used to indicate that a certain code path is unreachable, and it is typically used in situations where the compiler can prove that the code will never be executed. In this case, the `default` case is unreachable because all possible values of the `SYMBOL_TYPE` enumeration have been handled by the previous" GCC,riscv,721,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of the code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific input and the implementation of the `reg_renumber` function. However, based on the code snippet provided, it is likely that the next statement will be: `return regno;` This is because the `reg_renumber` function is called with the `regno` variable as an argument, and the return value of the function is assigned to the `regno` variable. Therefore, the next statement is likely to be the return statement, which returns the value of the `regno" GCC,riscv,722,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `reg_renumber` function and the value of the `regno` variable. However, based on the syntax and the fact that the `reg_renumber` function is being called with the `regno` variable as an argument, it is likely that the next statement will be a call to the `reg_renumber` function with the updated value of `regno` as an argument. For example, if the `reg_renumber` function is defined" GCC,riscv,723,"The next statement of this code snippet is: RTX_FRAME_RELATED_P (insn) = 1;" GCC,riscv,724,"The next statement after the code snippet you provided is likely to be a call to the `execv` function, which is used to execute a program with the specified arguments. The `execv` function takes the name of the program to be executed as its first argument, followed by an array of strings containing the arguments to be passed to the program. Here is an example of how the code snippet you provided might be used to execute a program with the specified arguments: ``` #include #include #include int main" GCC,riscv,725,"The next statement after the `if` block is: ``` return false; ``` This is because the `if` block only contains a `return` statement, and the `return` statement is only executed if the condition `call_saved && might_clobber` is true. If the condition is false, the `if` block is skipped and the `return` statement at the end of the function is executed." GCC,riscv,726,"The next statement after the `if` statement is: `return false;` This is because the `if` statement is checking if `call_saved` and `might_clobber` are both true. If they are, then the function returns `true`. However, if either of them is false, the function returns `false`." GCC,riscv,727,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be: `fn (mem, regno);` This is because the `riscv_save_restore_reg` function is defined to take four arguments: `mode`, `regno`, `offset`, and `fn`. The first three arguments are used to generate a memory location `mem` using the `gen_frame_mem` function, and the fourth argument `fn` is a function pointer that is used to perform the actual save or restore operation. Therefore, the next statement is likely to be a call to the `fn" GCC,riscv,728,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `rtx mem = gen_frame_mem ( BLKmode , ptr ) ;` This statement is creating a new memory location using the `gen_frame_mem` function, which is a GCC-specific function for creating memory locations. The first argument `BLKmode` specifies the mode of the memory location, and the second argument `ptr` specifies the address of the memory location. The resulting memory location is stored in the variable `mem`." GCC,riscv,729,"This code snippet appears to be part of a function that generates assembly code for a computer program. The function is using the `snprintf` function to format a string and store it in a buffer, and then it is using the `gcc_assert` function to check that the buffer is not too large. The next statement in the code snippet is: ``` label = gen_rtx_SYMBOL_REF ( Pmode , ggc_strdup ( buf ) ) ; ``` This statement is assigning a new value to the `label` variable, which is a `rtx` object" GCC,riscv,730,"This code snippet is part of a function that generates assembly code for the GNU Compiler Collection (GCC). The function appears to be generating code for a RISC-V target architecture. The code is creating a label for a symbol, and then using that label to generate a symbol reference. The label is created using the `gen_rtx_SYMBOL_REF` function, which takes a mode (Pmode), a string (buf), and a flag (SYMBOL_FLAG_LOCAL). The `ggc_strdup` function is used to create a copy of the string." GCC,riscv,731,"The next statement after the `if` block is: `return adjust_address ( op , word_mode , byte ) ;` This statement is executed if `MEM_P ( op )` is true, which means that `op` is a memory operand. The `adjust_address` function is called with `op` as the first argument, `word_mode` as the second argument, and `byte` as the third argument. The return value of `adjust_address` is then returned as the result of the function." GCC,riscv,732,"The next statement after the `if` statement is the `return` statement. The `if` statement checks if `REG_P(op)` is true, and if it is, it asserts that `FP_REG_RTX_P(op)` is false. If the assertion fails, the program will abort. If the `if` statement is true, the function will return the result of `simplify_gen_subreg(word_mode, op, mode, byte)`." GCC,riscv,733,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `rtx riscv_unspec_offset_high ( rtx temp , rtx addr , enum riscv_symbol_type symbol_type ) {` This is a function declaration, which defines a new function named `riscv_unspec_offset_high` that takes three arguments: `temp`, `addr`, and `symbol_type`. The function returns a value of type `rtx`." GCC,riscv,734,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the program depends on the specific values of the variables and the implementation of the `riscv_symbol_insns` function. However, based on the information provided, we can make some educated guesses about the possible next statements. The `riscv_symbol_insns` function appears to be a function that takes a symbol type as an argument and returns a boolean value indicating whether the symbol type is a literal. The function is called with the `sym_type` variable as an argument, and" GCC,riscv,735,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return false;` Explanation: The `riscv_valid_lo_sum_p` function takes two arguments: `sym_type` and `mode`. The function checks if the number of instructions for the symbol type `sym_type` is equal to ``. If it is, the function returns `false`. Otherwise, the function returns `true`. In this code snippet, the `if` statement checks if the number of instructions for the symbol type `sym_type` is equal to `) / UNITS_PER_WORD;` This statement is executed if `mode != BLKmode && might_split_p` is true, which means that the current address is not a block address and the address might be split. The statement adds the size of the current mode to `n`, rounded up to the nearest word boundary." GCC,riscv,737,"The next statement of this code snippet is: return arg.stack_p ? arg.num_gprs * UNITS_PER_WORD : ; Explanation: The code snippet is part of a function that returns the number of registers required for a function call. The function takes several arguments, including the cumulative arguments, the mode, the type, and a boolean value indicating whether the function is named. The first line of the code snippet initializes a struct riscv_arg_info variable called ""arg"" and calls the riscv_" GCC,riscv,738,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be a call to a function that initializes the `arg` structure with information about the RISC-V instruction being executed. The `riscv_arg_info` structure is typically used to store information about the arguments of a RISC-V instruction, such as the register numbers and the immediate values. Without more context, it is difficult to provide a more specific prediction. Can you provide more information about the code snippet or the context in which it is being used?" GCC,riscv,739,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be a call to the `mode_for_size` function, which takes three arguments: `bits`, `mode`, and `num_lit`. The function returns a machine mode that is appropriate for the given number of bits and literal value. In this case, the `bits` argument is set to `MAX(BITS_PER_UNIT, MIN(BITS_PER_WORD, MIN(MEM_ALIGN(src), MEM_ALIGN(dest))))`, which is the maximum number of bits that can be stored in" GCC,riscv,740,"Based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the next statement will be: case MULT: This is because the code is checking the type of the expression `x` using the `GET_CODE` macro, and then branching based on the result. The `case REG` and `case SUBREG` branches have already been handled, and the `case PLUS` branch has been handled for the case where the second operand is a constant. Therefore, the next branch that has not been handled is `case MULT`, which is likely to be the next statement." GCC,riscv,741,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific inputs and the implementation of the `riscv_classify_symbolic_expression` and `riscv_valid_base_register_p` functions. However, based on the code snippet, it appears that the next statement will be a `return` statement, as the code is checking the validity of a base register and a symbolic expression. The `riscv_classify_symbolic_expression` function appears to be classifying the symbolic expression `info->offset` as either" GCC,riscv,742,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `offset += RISCV_STACK_ALIGN ( cfun -> machine -> varargs_size ) ;` This statement adds the size of the varargs area to the current offset, which is used to calculate the total stack frame size. The `RISCV_STACK_ALIGN` macro is used to ensure that the offset is aligned to the stack alignment boundary." GCC,riscv,743,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `call_used_regs[regno] = ;` This statement is inside the `for` loop, and it assigns the value of `` to the `call_used_regs` array at the index `regno`. The value of `regno` is being incremented by 1 in each iteration of the loop, so the next statement will be executed with the next value of `regno`." GCC,riscv,744,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return align;` This statement is executed if the `if` condition is not met, which means that `TREE_CODE(exp)` is not equal to `STRING_CST` or `CONSTRUCTOR`. In this case, the function returns the value of `align`, which is the alignment of the expression." GCC,riscv,745,"The next statement is: insn = emit_insn (gen_add3_insn (stack_pointer_rtx, stack_pointer_rtx, GEN_INT (step2)));" GCC,riscv,746,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `if ( size > ) {`" GCC,riscv,747,"The next statement after the code snippet you provided is likely to be a closing brace `}`, as it is the end of the function or method that the code is a part of. Here's a breakdown of the code snippet you provided: * `fprintf`: This is a function that writes a formatted string to a file. * `asm_out_file`: This is the file that the formatted string will be written to. * ``: This is a string literal that will be written to the file. * `( flag_pic ? machine -> frame . fp_sp_offset - sp_offset;` This statement is assigning the value of `cfun -> machine -> frame . fp_sp_offset - sp_offset` to the variable `offset`. The expression `cfun -> machine -> frame . fp_sp_offset` is" GCC,riscv,750,"The next statement after the `return` statement in the code snippet you provided is the end of the function. The `return` statement is used to return a value from a function, and in this case, it is returning the value of the `riscv_get_arg_info` function, which is called with the specified arguments. The `riscv_get_arg_info` function is not defined in the code snippet you provided, so it is not possible to determine what it does or what value it returns. However, based on the name of the function, it is likely that it returns" GCC,riscv,751,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be a call to the `riscv_get_arg_info` function, which is defined in the `riscv.h` header file. The function takes several arguments, including a pointer to a `riscv_arg_info` structure, which is used to store information about the function's arguments. The `riscv_get_arg_info` function is used to retrieve information about the arguments of a function, such as their types, names, and positions in the function's parameter list. The function takes several arguments, including the `" GCC,riscv,752,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the implementation of the `get_cumulative_args` and `riscv_get_arg_info` functions, as well as the values of the variables `cum_v`, `mode`, `type`, and `named`. However, based on the names of the functions and variables, it is likely that the next statement will involve using the information stored in the `info` structure to perform some operation related to the arguments of a function. The `riscv_get_arg_info` function" GCC,riscv,753,"The next statement after the given code snippet would be: `return true;` The `if` statement checks if `TARGET_SAVE_RESTORE` is true, and if it is, the function returns false. If `TARGET_SAVE_RESTORE` is false, the function checks if `cfun->machine->naked_p` is true, and if it is, the function returns false. If both conditions are false, the function returns true." GCC,riscv,754,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return true;` Explanation: The `riscv_function_ok_for_sibcall` function is checking whether a function is suitable for a sibling call. The function takes two arguments: `decl`, which is the declaration of the function being called, and `exp`, which is the expression that calls the function. The function first checks if the target architecture has the `TARGET_SAVE_RESTORE` feature enabled. If it does, the function returns `false`, indicating that the function" GCC,riscv,755,"Based on the code snippet you provided, it appears to be a part of a function that is responsible for passing arguments to a function in the RISC-V instruction set architecture. The function takes several parameters, including `mode`, `fregno`, `gregno`, `type`, `fields`, `named`, `alignment`, and `info`. It appears to be determining the number of registers required to pass the arguments, and whether or not the arguments need to be passed on the stack. Based on the code snippet, it is difficult to predict the next statement with certainty, as" GCC,riscv,756,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `if ( FP_REG_P ( regno ) ) {` This is because the code checks if the register number is a floating-point register (using the `FP_REG_P` macro), and if so, it executes the code inside the `if` statement." GCC,riscv,757,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `addr = x;` This is because the `if` statement checks if `riscv_tls_symbol_p(x)` is true, and if it is, it returns the result of `riscv_legitimize_tls_address(x)`. If `riscv_tls_symbol_p(x)` is false, then the `if` statement is not executed, and the next statement is `addr = x;`." GCC,riscv,758,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `riscv_emit_move(dest, riscv_legitimize_tls_address(src));`" GCC,riscv,759,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `riscv_emit_move (dest, src)` This is because the code is checking if the `src` operand is a TLS symbol, and if it is, it is emitting a move instruction to move the TLS symbol to the `dest` operand. If the `src` operand is not a TLS symbol, the code is checking if it is a constant that can be forced into memory, and if it is, it is emitting a move instruction to move the constant to the `dest` operand. If the `src`" GCC,riscv,760,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return true;` This is because the `if` statement checks if `MEM_P (dest)` is true, and if `riscv_legitimate_address_p (mode, XEXP (dest, ), reload_completed)` is false. If both of these conditions are true, then the code inside the `if` statement is executed, which sets the `REG_EQUAL` note on the last instruction and returns `true`. If either of these conditions is false, then the code inside" GCC,riscv,761,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `if (MEM_P(dest) && !riscv_legitimate_address_p(mode, XEXP(dest, ), reload_completed)) {` This is because the first `if` statement checks if `dest` is a constant and if it is a valid move operand, and the second `if` statement checks if `src` is a constant and if it is a valid move operand. If neither of these conditions are true, then the third `if` statement is executed" GCC,riscv,762,"The next statement of this code snippet is: x = GEN_INT(codes[].value); Explanation: The code snippet is part of a function that is generating instructions for a RISC-V processor. The function is checking if a certain condition is met, and if it is not, it is generating a specific instruction. The next statement is to set the value of the variable ""x"" to the value of the ""value"" field of the ""codes"" array at index ." GCC,riscv,763,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific values of the variables and the behavior of the functions called. However, based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the next statement will be: x = gen_rtx_fmt_ee ( codes [ i ] . code , mode , x , GEN_INT ( codes [ i ] . value ) ) ; This statement is inside the loop, and it is called repeatedly for each iteration of the loop. It appears to be generating a new RTX (Register Transfer Language) expression," GCC,riscv,764,"Based on the code snippet you provided, it appears to be a part of a compiler or assembler for the RISC-V instruction set architecture. The code is setting various flags and options for the compiler or assembler, such as the CPU architecture, the ABI (Application Binary Interface), and the stack boundary. The next statement in the code snippet is: ``` if ( riscv_preferred_stack_boundary_arg ) { ``` This statement checks if the `riscv_preferred_stack_boundary_arg` flag is set. If it is set, the" GCC,riscv,765,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `if ( src_code == REG && FP_REG_P ( REGNO ( src ) ) ) {`" GCC,riscv,766,"Based on the code snippet you provided, it appears that the next statement will be: `if ( src_code == REG && FP_REG_P ( REGNO ( src ) ) ) return dbl_p ? ""fmov.d"" : ""fmov.s"";` This is because the code is checking the source operand's code and whether it is a floating-point register, and if so, it is returning the appropriate move instruction based on the size of the operand." GCC,riscv,767,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return !IN_RANGE(size, , * UNITS_PER_WORD);` This statement is executed if the `if` condition is not met, which means that `cum` is not `NULL` and `info.num_fprs` is not zero. The `IN_RANGE` macro checks if the `size` variable is within a certain range, and returns `true` if it is and `false` otherwise. The `!` operator negates the" GCC,riscv,768,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be a call to the `gen_rtx_EXPR_LIST` function, which is a function that generates an expression list. The function takes three arguments: the first is the mode of the expression list, the second is the expression list itself, and the third is a constant expression that represents the value of the expression list. In this code snippet, the first argument is `VOIDmode`, which means that the expression list is in void mode, which means that it does not have a specific type. The second argument is `x`, which is the expression" GCC,riscv,769,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `if ( REG_PARM_STACK_SPACE ( cfun -> decl ) == ) cfun -> machine -> varargs_size = gp_saved * UNITS_PER_WORD ;` This statement is checking if the register parameter stack space is equal to a specific value (represented by ``) and if so, it sets the `varargs_size` field of the `machine` structure to the value of `gp_saved` multiplied by the" GCC,riscv,770,"The next statement after the `if` block will be executed if the condition inside the `if` block is false. In this case, the condition is `decl == NULL_TREE || current_function_decl == NULL_TREE || current_function_decl == error_mark_node || ! cfun -> machine`. If any of these conditions are true, the `return` statement will be executed, and the function will return without executing any further statements. Therefore, the next statement after the `if` block will be executed if the condition inside the `if` block is false," GCC,riscv,771,"The next statement after the `if` block will be executed if the condition inside the `if` block is false. In this case, the condition is `decl == NULL_TREE || current_function_decl == NULL_TREE || current_function_decl == error_mark_node || ! cfun -> machine`. If any of these conditions are true, the `return` statement will be executed, and the function will return without executing any further statements. Therefore, the next statement after the `if` block will be executed if the condition inside the `if` block is false," GCC,riscv,772,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet without knowing the context and the purpose of the code. However, based on the names of the variables and the functions being called, it appears that the code is moving values between registers and memory locations. The first line of the code, `riscv_move_integer ( hi , hi , hival ) ;`, is moving the value of the `hival` register to the `hi` register. The second line of the code, `riscv_move_integer ( lo , lo , loval ) ;`, is moving the value of the `" GCC,riscv,773,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `riscv_move_integer(lo, lo, loval);` This statement moves the value of `loval` to the `lo` register. The `lo` register is a 32-bit register, and `loval` is a 64-bit value, so the value of `loval` is truncated to 32 bits and stored in `lo`." GCC,riscv,774,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `if ( low_out ) switch ( symbol_type ) {`" GCC,riscv,775,"The next statement after the `if` block is the `return` statement. The `if` block checks if the symbol type is not a split symbol type, and if the mode size is greater than the word size and the target is not in strict alignment or the mode bit size is greater than the mode alignment. If either of these conditions is true, the function returns `false`. If both conditions are false, the function returns `true`." GCC,riscv,776,"The next statement of this code snippet is: n += (GET_MODE_SIZE(mode) + UNITS_PER_WORD - ) / UNITS_PER_WORD; Explanation: The code snippet is part of a function that calculates the number of instructions needed to load a value from memory. The function takes a mode (which specifies the size of the value to be loaded) and an address (which specifies the location of the value in memory). The first part of the code snippet checks if the mode is not BL" GCC,riscv,777,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return false;` Explanation: The `riscv_epilogue_uses` function takes an unsigned integer `regno` as an argument. The function checks if the `regno` is equal to the `RETURN_ADDR_REGNUM` constant. If it is, the function returns `true`. Otherwise, the function returns `false`. In this case, the `regno` is not equal to `RETURN_ADDR_REGNUM`, so the function returns `false`." GCC,riscv,778,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be: `return call_saved || might_clobber;` This is because the `riscv_save_reg_p` function is checking whether a register should be saved or not, and it does this by checking two conditions: 1. `call_saved`: This is true if the register is not a global register and is not a call-used register. 2. `might_clobber`: This is true if the register is not a global register and is not a call-used register, and it is also" GCC,riscv,779,"The code snippet you provided is part of the GCC compiler's code generation for the `auipc` instruction, which is used to generate a symbolic reference to a label. The code is generating a symbolic reference to a label with the name `buf`, and it is also setting some flags on the symbolic reference. The next statement in the code snippet is: ``` if ( ! nonzero_address_p ( addr ) ) SYMBOL_REF_WEAK ( label ) = ; ``` This statement is checking if the address of the label" GCC,riscv,780,"The next statement of this code snippet is: return riscv_address_insns ( addr , mode , false ) + ; This statement is executed if the following conditions are met: * The target is RISC-V with the RVC (RISC-V Compressed) instruction set enabled. * The speed optimization is disabled. * The riscv_mshorten_memrefs function is enabled. * The mode is SImode (32-bit integer mode). * The address is not a compressed load/store" GCC,riscv,781,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `n += (GET_MODE_SIZE (mode) + UNITS_PER_WORD - ) / UNITS_PER_WORD;` This statement is executed if `mode` is not `BLKmode` and `might_split_p` is true. It calculates the number of instructions needed to load the address into a register, based on the size of the memory access and the word size of the target architecture." GCC,riscv,782,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `riscv_force_temporary` function and the values of the `offset` and `high` variables. However, based on the name of the function and the fact that it is being called with the `FALSE` argument, it is likely that the next statement will be a comparison or assignment operation that involves the `high` variable. Without more information about the specific implementation of the `riscv_force_temporary` function and the context in which this" GCC,riscv,783,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet without knowing the context and the specific implementation of the functions being called. However, based on the names of the functions and the variables being used, it appears that the code is generating instructions for a RISC-V processor. The `gen_int_mode` function appears to be generating a mode for an integer operation, and the `CONST_HIGH_PART` and `CONST_LOW_PART` functions are extracting the high and low parts of a constant, respectively. The `riscv_force_temporary`" GCC,riscv,784,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the program depends on the specific values of the variables and the implementation of the functions involved. However, based on the information provided, we can make some educated guesses about what the next statement might be. The `copy_addr_to_reg` function takes an address as an argument and returns a register containing the value at that address. The `XEXP` macro is used to extract the address of the memory location being accessed. Therefore, the next statement is likely to be a" GCC,riscv,785,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `reg = gen_rtx_REG ( SImode , regno ) ;` This statement is inside the `if` block, which means it will only be executed if the condition `BITSET_P ( cfun -> machine -> frame . mask , regno - GP_REG_FIRST )` is true. The `gen_rtx_REG` function is used to generate a new register with the specified mode (in this case, `SImode`) and number (in this case, `regno`). The" GCC,riscv,786,"The code snippet you provided is part of a function that adjusts the stack pointer and restores registers after a library call. The next statement is likely to be: `dwarf = alloc_reg_note ( REG_CFA_RESTORE, reg, dwarf );` This statement is allocating a register note for the register `reg` with the type `REG_CFA_RESTORE`. The `alloc_reg_note` function is used to allocate a register note, which is a special type of note that is used to store information about the register" GCC,riscv,787,"The code snippet you provided is a part of the GCC compiler's code generation for the RISC-V architecture. It is generating a sequence of instructions to adjust the stack pointer and save registers on the stack. The next statement after the code snippet you provided is likely to be the generation of the instruction sequence to restore the saved registers from the stack and adjust the stack pointer back to its original value. Here's a high-level overview of what the code snippet does: 1. It calculates the size of the stack frame adjustment needed for the current function call. 2" GCC,riscv,788,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `adjust_sp_rtx = gen_add3_insn ( stack_pointer_rtx , stack_pointer_rtx , GEN_INT ( - saved_size ) ) ;` This statement is an assignment to the `adjust_sp_rtx` variable, which is a pointer to an `rtx` structure representing the adjustment of the stack pointer. The `gen_add3_insn` function is called with three arguments: the first two are the `stack_pointer_rtx` and `" GCC,riscv,789,"The next statement after the `return` statement in the code snippet you provided is the end of the function. The function will return the value of the expression `! riscv_naked_function_p ( current_function_decl )`, which is a boolean value indicating whether the current function is a naked function or not." GCC,riscv,790,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return !riscv_naked_function_p(current_function_decl);` This statement returns the negation of the result of the `riscv_naked_function_p` function, which is called with the `current_function_decl` argument. The `riscv_naked_function_p` function is defined in the `riscv-gcc` library and is used to determine whether a function is a naked function, which is a function that does not have a prologue or epilogue. The `" GCC,riscv,791,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return arg.stack_p ? arg.num_gprs * UNITS_PER_WORD : ;` This statement is a ternary operator that checks the value of `arg.stack_p`. If it is true, the expression `arg.num_gprs * UNITS_PER_WORD` is evaluated and returned. Otherwise, the value of `` is returned. The purpose of this statement is to determine the number of registers that are required to pass the" GCC,riscv,792,"The next statement of this code snippet is: return TARGET_64BIT ? ( HOST_WIDE_INT_1 << ) : ; This statement is a ternary operator, which returns a value based on the value of the TARGET_64BIT macro. If TARGET_64BIT is true, the statement returns the result of shifting the value of HOST_WIDE_INT_1 to the left by the value of . If TARGET_64" GCC,riscv,793,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet without knowing the context in which it is being used. However, based on the name of the function and the variable names, it appears to be related to address sanitization (ASAN) in the RISC-V instruction set architecture. The function `riscv_asan_shadow_offset` is likely to return the offset of the shadow memory region used by the ASAN implementation. The `HOST_WIDE_INT` type is used to represent a wide integer value, which is likely to be used to store the offset value." GCC,riscv,794,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return COSTS_N_INSNS ( single_insns );` Explanation: The code snippet is checking the size of the mode of the operand `x` and comparing it to `UNITS_PER_WORD * `. If the size is equal to this value, it means that the operand is a double-precision floating-point number, and the function should return the cost of using double-precision instructions. The `COSTS_N_INS" GCC,riscv,795,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be the `riscv_block_move_straight` function call, which is used to move a block of memory from one location to another. The function takes three arguments: the destination address, the source address, and the number of bytes to move. The code snippet is part of a larger function that is responsible for adjusting the memory layout of a RISC-V program. The `riscv_adjust_block_mem` function is used to adjust the memory layout of a block of memory, and the `riscv_block_move" GCC,riscv,796,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `regs[i] = gen_reg_rtx(mode);` This line of code is part of a loop that iterates over the elements of the `regs` array, which is an array of `rtx` objects. The loop initializes each element of the array with a new `rtx` object generated by the `gen_reg_rtx` function, which creates a new register with the specified mode. The `mode` parameter is set to the mode returned by the `mode_for_size` function, which is" GCC,riscv,797,"The code snippet you provided is a loop that iterates over a block of memory, emitting a series of move instructions to copy data from one location to another. The loop starts at an offset of `` and increments the offset by `` with each iteration. The loop continues until the offset is greater than or equal to the length of the block. The next statement in the code snippet is: ``` src = adjust_address ( src , BLKmode , offset ) ; ``` This statement adjusts the source address of the move instruction to the correct" GCC,riscv,798,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `cost = alt_cost;`" GCC,riscv,799,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `codes[cost - ].code = PLUS;` Explanation: The code snippet is a part of a function that is trying to find the best way to represent a given integer value in a specific mode. The function is using a recursive approach, where it tries to find the best way to represent the value by breaking it down into smaller parts and then combining those parts using various operations (such as PLUS, XOR, etc.). The code snippet you provided is part of the function that handles the case where" GCC,riscv,800,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be: `end_sequence ( ) ;` This is because the previous line of code, `emit_call_insn ( gen_call_value ( result , func , const0_rtx , NULL ) ) ;`, emits a call instruction, and the `end_sequence ( )` function is typically used to end a sequence of instructions that were generated by a function. The `end_sequence ( )` function is used to indicate that the sequence of instructions has been generated and that the next instruction should be generated. It" GCC,riscv,801,"The next statement of this code snippet is: insn = get_insns(); Explanation: The code snippet is using the RISC-V instruction set architecture (ISA) and the GNU Compiler Collection (GCC) to generate machine code for a program. The code is using the emit_insn() function to generate a sequence of instructions, and the insn variable is being used to store the resulting instruction sequence. The first instruction generated is a call to the riscv_got_load_tls_gd() function, which is a function that" GCC,riscv,802,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return recog_memoized ( insn ) >= && get_attr_cannot_copy ( insn ) ;` This statement is a return statement that returns a boolean value indicating whether the instruction cannot be copied or not. The `recog_memoized` function is used to check if the instruction has been recognized and memoized, and the `get_attr_cannot_copy` function is used to check if the instruction has the `cannot_copy` attribute set. If both conditions" GCC,riscv,803,"The next statement after the `if` statement is: `if ( SMALL_OPERAND ( INTVAL ( offset ) ) && riscv_symbol_insns ( type ) > ) return true ;` This statement checks if the offset is a small operand and if the number of instructions required to load the symbol is less than or equal to the number of literal instructions. If both conditions are true, the function returns `true`." GCC,riscv,804,The next statement after the `break` statement is `case LEU:`. GCC,riscv,805,"Sure! Here's the predicted next statement: *code = LTU;" GCC,riscv,806,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet without knowing the specific implementation of the `riscv_can_change_mode_class` function. However, based on the function signature and the fact that it is a static function, it is likely that the next statement will be a check to see if the function can be executed with the given arguments. Here are a few possibilities: 1. The function may check if the `machine_mode` and `reg_class_t` arguments are valid and if they can be used to change the mode of the RISC-V processor." GCC,riscv,807,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return ! reg_classes_intersect_p ( FP_REGS , rclass ) ;` This statement returns a boolean value indicating whether the register class `rclass` intersects with the register class `FP_REGS`. If the two classes do not intersect, the function returns `true`, otherwise it returns `false`." GCC,riscv,808,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return (to == HARD_FRAME_POINTER_REGNUM || to == STACK_POINTER_REGNUM);` This statement is the return statement of the `riscv_can_eliminate` function. It returns a boolean value indicating whether the `to` register is either the hard frame pointer or the stack pointer." GCC,riscv,809,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `riscv_can_use_return_insn` function. However, based on the name of the function, it is likely that it returns a boolean value indicating whether the RISC-V architecture can use the `return` instruction." GCC,riscv,810,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `static enum riscv_symbol_type riscv_classify_symbol ( const_rtx x ) {` This is the beginning of a function definition, which is a block of code that is executed when the function is called. The function is named `riscv_classify_symbol`, and it takes a single argument `x`, which is a constant pointer to a `rtx` object. The function returns a value of type `enum riscv_symbol_type`, which is an enumeration of possible symbol types." GCC,riscv,811,The next statement after the `if` block is the `return` statement. The `return` statement will return the value of the expression `UNSPEC_ADDRESS_TYPE ( x )`. GCC,riscv,812,"The next statement after the `if` block is the `return` statement. The `if` block checks if `UNSPEC_ADDRESS_P ( x )` is true, and if it is, it returns the result of `UNSPEC_ADDRESS_TYPE ( x )`. If `UNSPEC_ADDRESS_P ( x )` is false, the `return` statement will be executed, which will return the result of `riscv_classify_symbol ( x )`." GCC,riscv,813,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return riscv_class_max_nregs_1 (rclass, mode);` This is because the `riscv_class_max_nregs` function is defined as a wrapper around the `riscv_class_max_nregs_1` function, which is the actual implementation of the function. The `riscv_class_max_nregs` function simply calls the `riscv_class_max_nregs_1` function with the same arguments and returns its result." GCC,riscv,814,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return result;` Explanation: The code snippet is a function that takes a `x` argument and a `reload_completed` argument. It first calls the `riscv_classify_address` function with the `addr` struct and the `x` argument, and stores the result in the `result` variable. If the `result` variable is false, or if the `addr.type` is not `ADDRESS_REG`, or if the `reload_completed` argument is true and the `addr.reg" GCC,riscv,815,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return ( CONST_INT_P ( x ) && ( INTVAL ( x ) & ) == && IN_RANGE ( INTVAL ( x ) , , CSW_MAX_OFFSET ) ) ;` This statement is a return statement that returns a boolean value indicating whether the given `x` is a constant integer and its value is within the range of the compressed load/store offset. The `CONST_INT_P` function" GCC,riscv,816,"This code snippet is checking if a given value `x` is a constant integer, and if it is within a certain range. The first part of the condition, `CONST_INT_P ( x )`, checks if `x` is a constant integer. If it is not, the condition will evaluate to false. The second part of the condition, `( INTVAL ( x ) & ) == `, checks if the value of `x` is equal to a specific value, which is represented by the placeholder `" GCC,riscv,817,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `offset = RISCV_STACK_ALIGN ( crtl -> outgoing_args_size ) ;` This statement is assigning the value of `crtl -> outgoing_args_size` to `offset`, after aligning it to the stack alignment boundary using `RISCV_STACK_ALIGN`." GCC,riscv,818,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `fixed_regs[regno] = call_used_regs[regno] = ;` This statement is inside the `for` loop, which is iterating over the registers from `FP_REG_FIRST` to `FP_REG_LAST`. The statement sets the `fixed_regs` and `call_used_regs` arrays for each register to ``." GCC,riscv,819,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return x == CONST0_RTX ( GET_MODE ( x ) ) ? : ;` This statement is a ternary operator that checks if `x` is equal to `CONST0_RTX` (a constant with a value of 0) in the mode of `x`. If it is, then the statement returns ``, which is a literal value. Otherwise, it returns ``, which is also a literal value" GCC,riscv,820,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return get_section(name, s->named.common.flags, NULL);` This statement is executed if the `if` condition is true, which means that the `s->named.name` starts with the string literal ``. The `get_section` function is called with the `name` variable as the first argument, which is a string that contains the name of the section, and the `s->named.common.flags` variable as the second argument, which is a set of flags that control the behavior of" GCC,riscv,821,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `strcpy (name, s->named.name);`" GCC,riscv,822,"The next statement after the `fprintf` call in the code snippet is: `fprintf(asm_out_file, , TARGET_STRICT_ALIGN ? : );` This statement is a call to the `fprintf` function, which is a standard C library function for printing formatted output to a file. The function takes three arguments: * `asm_out_file`: The file to which the output should be written. * ``: A string literal" GCC,riscv,823,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `case NE : fp_code = EQ ; * code = EQ ;`" GCC,riscv,824,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `cmp1 = force_reg (mode, cmp1);` This statement is assigning the value of `cmp1` to a new register of the same mode as `cmp0`, which is the mode of the first operand of the comparison. The purpose of this statement is to ensure that the second operand of the comparison is in a register, which is required by the `riscv_emit_int_order_test` function." GCC,riscv,825,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return ( can_create_pseudo_p ( ) ? emit_move_insn ( dest , src ) : emit_move_insn_1 ( dest , src ) ) ;` This statement is a return statement that returns the result of the `emit_move_insn` or `emit_move_insn_1` function, depending on the value of the `can_create_pseudo_p` function. If `can_create_pseudo_p` returns true, then `emit_move_ins" GCC,riscv,826,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return ( can_create_pseudo_p ( ) ? emit_move_insn ( dest , src ) : emit_move_insn_1 ( dest , src ) ) ;` This statement is a return statement that returns the result of the `emit_move_insn` or `emit_move_insn_1` function, depending on the value of the `can_create_pseudo_p` function. If `can_create_pseudo_p` returns true, then `emit_move_ins" GCC,riscv,827,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the `riscv_emit_set` function is not specified. However, based on the name of the function and the parameters it takes, it is likely that the function will generate a RISC-V instruction to set the value of a register or memory location to the value of another register or memory location. Without more information about the specific implementation of the `riscv_emit_set` function, it is not possible to provide a more detailed prediction of the next statement." GCC,riscv,828,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `emit_insn ( gen_stack_tiesi ( stack_pointer_rtx , hard_frame_pointer_rtx ) ) ;` This is because the `if` statement checks whether `Pmode` is equal to `SImode`, and if it is, it emits the `gen_stack_tiesi` instruction. If `Pmode` is not equal to `SImode`, it emits the `gen_stack_tiedi` instruction. Since the `if` statement is checking for equality with `" GCC,riscv,829,"The next statement after the `if` block is the `return` statement. Therefore, the next statement of this code snippet is: ``` return true; ```" GCC,riscv,830,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `if ( df_regs_ever_live_p ( regno ) || ( ! crtl -> is_leaf && call_used_or_fixed_reg_p ( regno ) ) ) return true ;` This statement is executed if the `if` condition in the previous line is true, which means that the `regno` is equal to the return address register number. The statement checks if the `df_regs_ever_live_p` function returns true for the given `regno`, or if the current function" GCC,riscv,831,"The next statement after the `for` loop is `riscv_block_move_loop(dest, src, bytes, iter_words * UNITS_PER_WORD);`. The `for` loop is iterating over the range of `i` from `min_iter_words` to `min_iter_words * - `, and for each iteration, it is calculating the cost of using `i` as the number of iterations for the loop. The cost is calculated as the sum of the number of words to be moved and the" GCC,riscv,832,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `rtx condition = gen_rtx_fmt_ee (code, VOIDmode, op0, op1);` This statement is generating a new `rtx` object called `condition` using the `gen_rtx_fmt_ee` function. The function takes four arguments: the first is the `code` object, which is a `rtx` object representing the instruction being generated; the second is the `VOIDmode` object, which is a special mode that indicates that the instruction does not have a result; the third" GCC,riscv,833,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the `riscv_emit_int_compare` function is not specified. However, based on the name of the function and the parameters it takes, it is likely that the function emits some kind of instruction or code that compares the values of `op0` and `op1` and performs some kind of operation based on the result of the comparison. Without more information about the specific implementation of the `riscv_emit_int_compare` function, it is not possible to provide a more specific prediction of" GCC,riscv,834,"The next statement is: `rtx dwarf = NULL_RTX;`" GCC,riscv,835,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `riscv_emit_float_compare (&code, &op0, &op1);` This statement is calling the `riscv_emit_float_compare` function, which is not defined in the code snippet provided. The function is likely defined elsewhere in the program or in a separate file. The function takes four arguments: the first is a pointer to the `code` variable, which is an `enum rtx_code` value representing the comparison operation to be performed; the second is a pointer to the `op0` variable, which" GCC,riscv,836,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `riscv_emit_set(target, lowpart_subreg(SImode, cmp, word_mode));` This statement is emitting a set instruction to set the target register to the low part of the comparison result, which is stored in the `cmp` register. The `lowpart_subreg` function is used to extract the low part of the `cmp` register, which is a word-sized register, and convert it to a single-precision floating-point value in the `SImode` mode." GCC,riscv,837,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `riscv_emit_binary ( code , target , zie , const0_rtx ) ;` This statement is executed if the `code` variable is equal to `EQ` or `NE`. It emits a binary operation with the `code` as the operation code, the `target` as the target register, the `zie` as the first operand, and `const0_rtx` as the second operand." GCC,riscv,838,"The next statement after the `if` statement in the code snippet you provided is: ``` rtx zie = riscv_zero_if_equal ( op0 , op1 ) ; ``` This statement assigns the result of the `riscv_zero_if_equal` function to the `zie` variable, which is a `rtx` object. The `riscv_zero_if_equal` function takes two operands `op0` and `op1` and returns a `rtx` object that represents the result of the comparison." GCC,riscv,839,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `frame->mask = mask;` This statement assigns the value of `mask` to the `mask` field of the `frame` structure." GCC,riscv,840,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `insn = gen_add3_insn ( stack_pointer_rtx , stack_pointer_rtx , GEN_INT ( - step1 ) ) ;` This statement is adding a constant value to the stack pointer register using the `gen_add3_insn` function. The constant value is `- step1`, which is the minimum of `size` and the result of the `riscv_first_stack_step` function, and is stored in the `step1` variable. The `gen_add3_" GCC,riscv,841,"The next statement after the `if` block is: `* op0 = gen_rtx_ZERO_EXTEND ( word_mode , * op0 ) ;` This statement is executed if the condition `unsigned_condition ( code ) == code` is true, and it zero-extends the value in `* op0` to the size of `word_mode`." GCC,riscv,842,"Based on the code snippet you provided, it appears that the function `riscv_extend_comparands` is being defined. The function takes three arguments: `code`, `op0`, and `op1`. The function first checks if the size of the mode of `word_mode` is greater than the size of the mode of `*op0`. If this is the case, and `unsigned_condition(code) == code`, then the function checks if `GET_MODE(*op0) == QImode` and if `*op0` is not a `SUBREG` with" GCC,riscv,843,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `if ( ! unsigned_p && GET_MODE ( op ) == SImode ) return COSTS_N_INSNS ( ) ;` This statement is executed if the `unsigned_p` flag is false and the mode of the `op` operand is `SImode`." GCC,riscv,844,"The next statement in the code snippet is: `if ( TARGET_ZBB ) { if ( ! unsigned_p && GET_MODE ( op ) == QImode ) return COSTS_N_INSNS ( ) ;` This statement checks if the target architecture is ZBB, and if it is, it checks if the operation is not unsigned and the mode is QImode. If both conditions are true, it returns the cost of the operation in number of instructions." GCC,riscv,845,"The next statement of this code snippet is: fprintf ( asm_out_file , , ( flag_pic ? : ) ) ; This is because the first statement, default_file_start ( ) ;, is a function call that does not have a return value, so it does not affect the control flow of the program. The second statement, fprintf ( asm_out_file , , ( flag_pic ? : total_size % IMM_REACH < IMM_REACH / && frame -> total_size % IMM_REACH >= min_first_step ) return frame -> total_size % IMM_REACH ;`, is a conditional statement that returns a value if the condition is true." GCC,riscv,847,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return - ;` This is because the `if` statement checks if `type` is not a record type, and if it is not, it returns a negative value. The value of `` is not specified in the code snippet, so it could be any negative value." GCC,riscv,848,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `int num_fields = 0;` This is because the function `riscv_flatten_aggregate_argument` is initializing a local variable `num_fields` to 0, which will be used to keep track of the number of fields in the aggregate type. The function is then checking if the `type` parameter is not null and if it is a record type, and if it is not, it will return -1." GCC,riscv,849,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return n;` Explanation: The code snippet is a part of a function that flattens an aggregate field, which is a field that contains multiple subfields. The function takes a type, a list of fields, and an offset as input, and it returns the number of subfields in the flattened field. The function starts by checking the type of the field and dispatching to the appropriate handler for each type. The `case ARRAY_TYPE` block is the one that is currently being executed. In this" GCC,riscv,850,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return x;` This statement returns the value of `x`, which is the result of the `force_reg` function if the address is not legitimate, or the original `x` value if it is legitimate." GCC,riscv,851,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `rtx result = gen_rtx_fmt_ee (code, mode, x, y);` This statement generates a new RTX expression with the specified code, mode, and operands. The `gen_rtx_fmt_ee` function is used to generate the RTX expression, and it takes the code, mode, and operands as arguments. The resulting RTX expression is stored in the `result` variable." GCC,riscv,852,"The next statement after the `return` statement in the code snippet is the end of the function. The function has returned a value, and there are no more statements to execute." GCC,riscv,853,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `offset = cfun->machine->frame.fp_sp_offset - sp_offset;` This statement is outside the `for` loop, so it will be executed after the loop has finished executing. It sets the value of `offset` to the difference between the frame pointer's stack pointer offset and the current stack pointer offset." GCC,riscv,854,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be a call to the `gen_rtx_SET` function, which is a function that generates a new `rtx` object representing a memory-to-register move instruction. The function takes two arguments: `mem`, which is the memory location being accessed, and `reg`, which is the register being written to. The statement `rtx set = gen_rtx_SET ( mem , reg ) ;` is likely to be the initialization of a new `rtx` object `set` that represents a memory-to-register move instruction," GCC,riscv,855,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return riscv_get_arg_info(&info, cum, arg.mode, arg.type, arg.named, false);` This statement is calling the `riscv_get_arg_info` function, which is likely to be defined in the same file or in a header file included by this file. The function takes several arguments, including a pointer to a `riscv_arg_info` structure, a pointer to a `CUMULATIVE_ARGS` structure, and several other arguments related to the argument being processed." GCC,riscv,856,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `info.type = arg.type;` This is because the `if` statement checks if the `end_marker_p` function of the `arg` object returns `true`, and if so, it sets the `type` field of the `info` struct to the `type` field of the `arg` object." GCC,riscv,857,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be a call to the `riscv_get_arg_info` function, which is a member of the `riscv_arg_info` structure. The function takes several arguments, including the address of the `riscv_arg_info` structure, the cumulative argument number, the argument mode, the argument type, and a flag indicating whether the argument is named. The function returns information about the argument, such as its name, type, and location in the function's stack frame. Here is an example of how the code might continue:" GCC,riscv,858,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `riscv_get_arg_info` function and the values of the `cum`, `arg.mode`, `arg.type`, and `arg.named` variables. However, based on the name of the function and the parameters it is receiving, it is likely that the function is retrieving information about a function argument, such as its type, name, and whether it is a named argument or not. Without more information about the specific implementation of the `riscv_" GCC,riscv,859,"The next statement after the code snippet you provided is: `return alignment;`" GCC,riscv,860,"The next statement after the given code snippet would be: `return true;` The code is checking if the `cfun` object has a `machine` attribute, and if that attribute has a `naked_p` or `interrupt_handler_p` attribute set to `true`. If either of these conditions is met, the function returns `false`. Otherwise, the function returns `true`." GCC,riscv,861,"The next statement after the code snippet you provided is: `memset(&args, 0, sizeof(args));` This statement sets the entire `args` structure to zero, which is a common idiom in C programming to initialize a structure to a known state. The `memset` function is used to set the memory at the address of `args` to zero, and the `sizeof(args)` expression is used to determine the size of the structure." GCC,riscv,862,"The next statement of this code snippet is: return gen_rtx_REG ( mode , fregno ) ; Explanation: The code snippet is part of a function that generates instructions for a RISC-V processor. The function is handling the case where the mode of the operand is a floating-point or complex floating-point type. The code is checking if the operand is a single-precision floating-point value (i.e., is 1) and if so, it returns a register operand with the appropriate mode and" GCC,riscv,863,"The next statement is likely to be: `info->num_fprs = riscv_pass_mode_in_fpr_p (mode);` This is because the code is checking the number of floating-point registers required for the function call, and the `riscv_pass_mode_in_fpr_p` function is used to determine the number of floating-point registers needed for a particular mode. The `info->num_fprs` variable is then set to the number of floating-point registers required for the function call." GCC,riscv,864,"Based on the code snippet you provided, it appears to be part of a function that is checking the attributes of a function declaration. The function is checking whether the function is a interrupt function and if it has a specific attribute. The next statement of the code snippet you provided is: ``` if ( attr_args && TREE_CODE ( TREE_VALUE ( attr_args ) ) != VOID_TYPE ) ``` This statement is checking whether the `attr_args` variable is not null and whether the type of the attribute is not `VOID_TYPE`. If this condition is true" GCC,riscv,865,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return UNKNOWN_MODE;` This is because the function `riscv_get_interrupt_type` is checking the type of the `decl` parameter, and if it is not a function declaration or if it does not have an interrupt type attribute, it returns `UNKNOWN_MODE`." GCC,riscv,866,"The next statement after the `if` block is the `return` statement, which returns the result of the `gen_got_load_tls_gddi` function." GCC,riscv,867,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return gen_got_load_tls_gddi ( dest , sym ) ;`" GCC,riscv,868,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return gen_got_load_tls_iedi ( dest , sym ) ;`" GCC,riscv,869,"The next statement after the `if` statement in the code snippet you provided is: `return gen_got_load_tls_iedi ( dest , sym ) ;` This statement is executed if the condition `Pmode == DImode` is true, which means that the `gen_got_load_tls_iedi` function is called with the arguments `dest` and `sym`. The function `gen_got_load_tls_iedi` is not defined in the code snippet you provided, so it is not possible to determine what it does or what it" GCC,riscv,870,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `if (GET_CODE (elt) != REG || !REG_P (elt) || !REG_SAVE_P (elt)) return false;` This statement is checking if the current element `elt` is a register, and if it is a register that needs to be saved. If the element is not a register, or if it is a register but does not need to be saved, then the function returns `false`." GCC,riscv,871,"The next statement of this code snippet is: return (GET_MODE_SIZE(mode) + UNITS_PER_FP_REG - ) / UNITS_PER_FP_REG; This statement is the return value of the function, which is calculated based on the mode size, the number of units per FP register, and a literal value (). The calculation is performed using integer arithmetic, and the result is rounded down to the nearest integer by dividing by UNITS_PER_FP_REG." GCC,riscv,872,"The next statement of this code snippet is: return (GET_MODE_SIZE (mode) + UNITS_PER_WORD - ) / UNITS_PER_WORD;" GCC,riscv,873,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `case GT: case GTU: return SMALL_OPERAND(x) && x != ;`" GCC,riscv,874,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `dest = ;` This is because the `else if` statement that checks if `to == STACK_POINTER_REGNUM` is true, and the corresponding block of code is executed, which assigns the value `` to `dest`." GCC,riscv,875,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `riscv_init_machine_status` function and the input parameters passed to it. However, based on the name of the function and the fact that it is declared as a `static` function, it is likely that this function is used to initialize the machine status for a RISC-V processor. The function may be called at the beginning of the program or when the machine status needs to be updated. Without more information about the specific implementation of this function," GCC,riscv,876,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return MIN ( riscv_build_integer ( codes , val , VOIDmode ) , riscv_split_integer_cost ( val ) ) ;` This statement is the return statement of the `riscv_integer_cost` function, which returns the minimum of the cost of building the integer operation using the `riscv_build_integer` function and the cost of splitting the integer operation using the `riscv_split_integer_cost` function. The `MIN` function is used to compare the two costs and return the" GCC,riscv,877,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be the return statement, which returns the minimum of two values: 1. The result of the `riscv_build_integer` function, which takes the `codes` array, the `val` parameter, and the `VOIDmode` parameter as inputs, and returns an integer value. 2. The result of the `riscv_split_integer_cost` function, which takes the `val` parameter as input and returns an integer value representing the cost of splitting the integer. The `MIN` function is used to compare these two values" GCC,riscv,878,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return TREE_CODE (type) == INTERRUPT_TYPE;`" GCC,riscv,879,"The next statement after the code snippet you provided is likely to be a check for the return value of the `lookup_attribute` function. The `lookup_attribute` function takes two arguments: a string literal and a type attribute. It returns a pointer to the attribute if it exists, or `NULL` if it doesn't. In this code snippet, the `lookup_attribute` function is called with a string literal and the `TYPE_ATTRIBUTES` macro, which returns a pointer to the type attributes of the `type` parameter. The return value of the `lookup_" GCC,riscv,880,The next statement after `return cmp1 == const1_rtx ;` is `case LT :`. GCC,riscv,881,"The code snippet is checking if the `x` variable is a `VAR_DECL` and has a `DECL_SECTION_NAME` attribute. If it does, it compares the section name to two string literals and returns `true` if either comparison is equal. Therefore, the next statement of this code snippet would be: ``` return strcmp(sec, """") == || strcmp(sec, """") == ; ``` This statement returns `true` if" GCC,riscv,882,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return riscv_size_ok_for_small_data_p ( int_size_in_bytes ( TREE_TYPE ( x ) ) ) ;` This statement is executed if the `if` condition is not true, which means that the `TREE_CODE` of `x` is not `VAR_DECL` or the `DECL_SECTION_NAME` of `x` is not a valid section name. In this case, the function `riscv_size_ok_for_small_data_" GCC,riscv,883,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `riscv_issue_rate` function and the input parameters passed to it. However, based on the name of the function and the fact that it is declared as `static`, it is likely that the function is used to determine the issue rate of a RISC-V processor, which is the number of instructions that can be issued per cycle. Therefore, the next statement of this code snippet is likely to be a calculation or a comparison of the issue rate with some other value" GCC,riscv,884,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `riscv_classify_address` function and the values of the variables `addr`, `x`, `mode`, and `strict_p`. However, based on the name of the function and the variables being passed to it, it is likely that the function is used to classify an address based on the mode and strictness of the address. The function may return a value indicating the type of address (e.g. instruction, data, or stack) and the mode" GCC,riscv,885,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet without knowing the specific implementation of the `riscv_legitimate_address_p` function. However, based on the name of the function and the parameters it takes, it appears to be a function that checks whether a given address is legitimate for a particular machine mode and strictness setting. Without knowing the specific implementation of the function, it is difficult to predict the next statement that will be executed. However, some possible next statements could include: * Checking the validity of the address based on the machine mode and strictness setting" GCC,riscv,886,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return riscv_const_insns ( x ) > ;` This statement is a return statement that returns the result of the comparison `riscv_const_insns ( x ) > `. The `riscv_const_insns` function is called with the argument `x`, and the result of the function is compared to the constant ``. If the result is greater than ``, the function returns `true`, otherwise it returns `false`." GCC,riscv,887,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be a check for the type of the constant `x`. The function `riscv_legitimate_constant_p` is a predicate that checks whether a constant is a legitimate constant for a particular machine mode. The `machine_mode` parameter is used to specify the machine mode for which the constant is being checked. In this code snippet, the `machine_mode` parameter is not used, so it is likely that the function is only checking the type of the constant `x`. The next statement is likely to be a check for the type of `" GCC,riscv,888,"The next statement of this code snippet is: addr = riscv_add_offset ( NULL , base , offset ) ;" GCC,riscv,889,"The next statement after the `riscv_emit_move` function call is the `return` statement. The `riscv_emit_move` function is called with two arguments: `reg` and `addr`. The function emits a move instruction that moves the value stored in `addr` to `reg`, and then returns the value of `reg`. The `return` statement after the `riscv_emit_move` function call returns the value of `reg`, which is the result of the move instruction." GCC,riscv,890,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return false;`" GCC,riscv,891,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `riscv_emit_move(dest, riscv_add_offset(NULL, base, INTVAL(offset)));` This statement is emitting a move instruction to move the value of `src` to `dest`, using the `riscv_add_offset` function to calculate the offset of `src` from `base`. The `riscv_emit_move` function is used to emit the move instruction, and the `riscv_add_offset` function is used to calculate the offset of `src` from `base`." GCC,riscv,892,"The next statement in the code snippet is: emit_insn ( gen_add3_insn ( dest , tmp , tp ) ) ;" GCC,riscv,893,"Based on the code snippet provided, it appears to be part of a function that is generating code for a TLS (Thread-Local Storage) access. The function is checking the `flag_pic` variable to determine whether to use a local or global dynamic model for the TLS access. The `switch` statement is checking the value of the `model` variable to determine which type of TLS access to generate. The `case` statements are checking for the different types of TLS models that are supported by the code. Based on the code snippet, it is difficult to predict the next statement that will be executed," GCC,riscv,894,"The next statement in the code snippet is: `if ( GET_MODE_BITSIZE ( mode ) <= ) might_split_p = false ;` This statement checks if the mode of the memory operand is less than or equal to a certain number (represented by ). If it is, then the variable `might_split_p` is set to `false`." GCC,riscv,895,"The next statement after the `switch` statement would be the `return` statement. The `switch` statement is checking the value of the `memmodel` variable, and based on that value, it is returning a boolean value. The possible values of `memmodel` are `MEMMODEL_ACQUIRE`, `MEMMODEL_CONSUME`, `MEMMODEL_SYNC_ACQUIRE`, `MEMMODEL_RELEASE`, `MEMMODEL_SYNC_RELEASE`, and `MEMMODEL_RELAXED`. If" GCC,riscv,896,"The next statement after the `switch` statement will be the `default` case, which is `gcc_unreachable()`. This is because the `switch` statement does not have a `break` statement after the `return true` statement, so the control flow will fall through to the next case, which is the `default` case. Therefore, the next statement of this code snippet will be `gcc_unreachable()`." GCC,riscv,897,"The next statement after the `switch` statement is the `default` case, which is an unreachable statement. The `gcc_unreachable()` function is used to indicate that the `default` case is not supposed to be reached, and it will cause the compiler to generate an error if the `default` case is actually reached. Therefore, the next statement after the `switch` statement is the `gcc_unreachable()` function call, which will cause the compiler to generate an error if the `default` case is reached." GCC,riscv,898,"The next statement in the code snippet is: `case MEMMODEL_ACQUIRE:`" GCC,riscv,899,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return ( tune_param -> memory_cost + memory_move_secondary_cost ( mode , rclass , in ) ) ;` This statement is a return statement that returns the value of the expression `( tune_param -> memory_cost + memory_move_secondary_cost ( mode , rclass , in ) )` to the caller of the function. The expression `( tune_param -> memory_cost + memory_move_secondary_cost ( mode , rclass , in ) )` is a sum" GCC,riscv,900,"The next statement in this code snippet is: `combined_attrs = merge_attributes ( DECL_ATTRIBUTES ( olddecl ) , DECL_ATTRIBUTES ( newdecl ) ) ;` This statement combines the attributes of the two declarations `olddecl` and `newdecl` using the `merge_attributes` function. The resulting combined attributes are then returned as the value of the function." GCC,riscv,901,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `combined_attrs = merge_attributes ( DECL_ATTRIBUTES ( olddecl ) , DECL_ATTRIBUTES ( newdecl ) ) ;` This statement combines the attributes of the old declaration (`olddecl`) and the new declaration (`newdecl`) using the `merge_attributes` function. The resulting combined attributes are then returned." GCC,riscv,902,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return ( mode1 == mode2 || ! ( GET_MODE_CLASS ( mode1 ) == MODE_FLOAT && GET_MODE_CLASS ( mode2 ) == MODE_FLOAT ) ) ;` This statement is a return statement that returns a boolean value. The return value is determined by the expression inside the parentheses. The expression inside the parentheses is a logical OR operation between two conditions: * `mode1 == mode2`: This condition checks if the two modes are equal. * `!" GCC,riscv,903,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet without knowing the specific implementation of the `riscv_modes_tieable_p` function. However, based on the name of the function and the parameters it takes, it is likely that the function is used to determine whether two machine modes are ""tieable"" or not. In RISC-V, a mode is considered tieable if it can be represented by a single register. For example, a 32-bit integer mode is tieable because it can be represented by a single 32-bit register. On" GCC,riscv,904,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `x = GEN_INT(codes[].value);`" GCC,riscv,905,"The next statement after the code snippet you provided is likely to be a `return` statement, as the code is checking if a certain attribute is present in the function declaration and returning a boolean value indicating whether it is present or not. Here's a possible next statement: ``` return true; ``` This statement would indicate that the attribute being checked is present in the function declaration, and the function would return `true` to indicate that the attribute is present. Alternatively, the next statement could be: ``` return false; ``` This statement would indicate that the attribute being" GCC,riscv,906,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `if (old_cost > new_cost) {`" GCC,riscv,907,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be a conditional statement that checks the value of the `speed` variable and performs different actions based on its value. Here is a possible next statement: ``` if (speed) { // Code to optimize the block for speed } else { // Code to optimize the block for size } ``` This is just one possible next statement, and the actual next statement may depend on the specific implementation of the `optimize_bb_for_speed_p` function and the surrounding code." GCC,riscv,908,"The next statement in this code snippet is: `const char * str = riscv_stack_protector_guard_reg_str;`" GCC,riscv,909,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the `riscv_save_libcall_count` function is not known. However, based on the name of the function, it is likely that it returns the number of library calls that have been made with the specified `mask`. Therefore, the next statement of this code snippet is likely to be a statement that uses the value returned by `riscv_save_libcall_count` in some way. For example, it might be a statement that increments a counter based on the number of library" GCC,riscv,910,"The next statement after the `gcc_assert` statement is likely to be a `return` statement, as the purpose of the `gcc_assert` statement is to ensure that the `snprintf` function call did not overflow the buffer `s`. If the `snprintf` function call did overflow the buffer, the `gcc_assert` statement will trigger a runtime error, which will cause the program to terminate. Therefore, the next statement after the `gcc_assert` statement is likely to be a `return` statement that returns an error code or a null pointer to indicate that the function call failed." GCC,riscv,911,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be: `emit_insn ( gen_movsi ( temp1, fnaddr ) ) ;` This is because the code is setting up the prologue for a function, and the next step is typically to move the function's address into a temporary register. The `emit_insn` function is used to generate and emit a machine instruction, and the `gen_movsi` function is used to generate a move instruction that moves the value of `fnaddr` into the temporary register `temp1`." GCC,riscv,912,"The code snippet is part of a function that generates instructions for a RISC-V processor. The function is emitting a call instruction using the `gen_sibcall` function, which is a part of the GCC compiler. The `gen_sibcall` function takes several arguments, including the address of the function to be called, the constant 0, and a null pointer. The function returns a pointer to the generated instruction. The code snippet is checking the value of `vcall_offset` and if it is not equal to ``, it is em" GCC,riscv,913,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `if ( dest_code == REG ) {`" GCC,riscv,914,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return ;` This is because the `if` statement checks if `cfun->machine->naked_p` is true, and if it is, the function returns the string literal ``. If `cfun->machine->naked_p` is false, the function continues to the next statement, which is not shown in the code snippet." GCC,riscv,915,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the program depends on the input and the specific implementation of the `riscv_output_return` function. However, based on the name of the function, it is likely that it returns a pointer to a string that represents the output of the RISC-V processor." GCC,riscv,916,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return &riscv_tune_info[tune_string];` Explanation: The `riscv_parse_tune` function takes a string as input and returns a pointer to a `riscv_tune_info` structure. The function first calls `riscv_find_cpu` to find the CPU with the given name, and then sets the `tune_string` variable to the `tune` field of the CPU structure. Finally, the function returns a pointer to the `riscv_t" GCC,riscv,917,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be: `if (num_int_old != num_int_new || num_float_old != num_float_new) {` This is because the code is checking whether the number of integer and floating-point fields in the old and new versions of the aggregate type are the same. If they are not the same, then the code will execute the body of the `if` statement, which is likely to be responsible for handling the case where the aggregate type has changed." GCC,riscv,918,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be the `for` loop, as it is the next line of code that is executed after the `int n_new = riscv_flatten_aggregate_argument ( type , fields , true ) ;` statement. The `for` loop initializes `i` to `` and then checks if `i` is less than `n_new`. If `i` is less than `n_new`, the loop body is executed, which checks if `fields[i].type` is not a scalar float type. If" GCC,riscv,919,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `riscv_get_arg_info(&info, cum, arg.mode, arg.type, arg.named, false);` This line of code calls the `riscv_get_arg_info` function, which populates the `info` structure with information about the argument. The function takes the following arguments: * `info`: a pointer to a `riscv_arg_info` structure that will be populated with information about the argument. * `cum`: a pointer to a `CUMULATIVE_AR" GCC,riscv,920,"The next statement after the `riscv_get_arg_info` function call is: `return false;` This is because the `riscv_get_arg_info` function sets the `num_fprs` field of the `info` structure to 0 if the argument is not a floating-point register, and the `if` statement checks if `info.num_fprs` is non-zero. Since the `num_fprs` field is set to 0, the `if` statement evaluates to `false`, and the function returns `false" GCC,riscv,921,"The next statement of this code snippet is: return gen_rtx_PARALLEL ( mode , gen_rtvec ( , gen_rtx_EXPR_LIST ( VOIDmode , gen_rtx_REG ( mode1 , regno1 ) , GEN_INT ( offset1 ) ) , gen_rtx_EXPR_LIST ( VOIDmode , gen_rtx_REG ( mode2 , regno2 ) , GEN_INT ( offset2 ) ) ) ) ; This statement is a return statement that" GCC,riscv,922,"The next statement after the code snippet you provided is: `return x;` This statement returns the value of `x` from the function." GCC,riscv,923,"The next statement of this code snippet is: x = gen_rtx_PARALLEL ( type_mode , gen_rtvec ( , x ) ) ; This statement is assigning the result of the gen_rtx_PARALLEL function to the variable x. The gen_rtx_PARALLEL function takes two arguments: the first is the type mode, which is set to type_mode in this case, and the second is a vector of expressions, which is generated by the gen_rtvec function. The gen_rtvec function" GCC,riscv,924,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return false;` Explanation: The `riscv_pass_mode_in_fpr_p` function takes a `machine_mode` parameter and checks if the mode is a floating-point mode (i.e., `GET_MODE_CLASS (mode) == MODE_FLOAT` or `GET_MODE_CLASS (mode) == MODE_COMPLEX_FLOAT`). If the mode is not a floating-point mode, the function returns `false`. In the code" GCC,riscv,925,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `output_addr_const (file, newop);` This is because the previous statement, `case 'S':`, is a switch case that checks the value of the `code` variable, and if it matches the value `'S'`, it executes the code inside the case. The code inside the case is: ``` { rtx newop = GEN_INT (ctz_hwi (INTVAL (op))); output_addr_const (file, newop); break; } ```" GCC,riscv,926,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `case MEM :`" GCC,riscv,927,"The next statement after the code snippet you provided is: fprintf ( file , , reloc ) ; This statement is using the fprintf function to print a string literal to the file, along with the reloc variable. The reloc variable is a pointer to a string literal, and the placeholder is used to represent the string literal that the reloc variable points to. The fprintf function is used to print the string literal to the file, along with the reloc variable, which is a pointer to the string literal." GCC,riscv,928,The next statement after the `if` block is `unsignedp = * punsignedp ;`. GCC,riscv,929,"The code snippet you provided is a ternary operator, which is a shorthand way of writing an if-else statement. The general syntax of a ternary operator is: `condition ? expression1 : expression2` In this case, the condition is `riscv_secondary_memory_needed ( mode , from , to )`, which is a function call that returns a boolean value. If the function returns `true`, the expression `expression1` is evaluated and returned. If the function returns `false`, the expression `expression2` is evaluated and returned. B" GCC,riscv,930,"The code snippet you provided is a ternary operator, which is a shorthand way of writing an if-else statement. The general syntax of a ternary operator is: `condition ? expression1 : expression2` In this case, the condition is `riscv_secondary_memory_needed ( mode , from , to )`, which is a function call that returns a boolean value. If the function returns `true`, the expression `expression1` is evaluated and returned. If the function returns `false`, the expression `expression2` is evaluated and returned. B" GCC,riscv,931,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of the code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific input and the implementation of the `reg_renumber` function. However, based on the code snippet provided, it is likely that the next statement will be: `return regno;` This is because the `reg_renumber` function is called with the `regno` variable as an argument, and the return value of the function is assigned to the `regno` variable. Therefore, the next statement is likely to be the return statement, which returns the value of the `regno" GCC,riscv,932,"The next statement after the `if` block in the code snippet you provided is: ``` riscv_remove_unneeded_save_restore_calls(); ``` This statement is executed if the `TARGET_SAVE_RESTORE` macro is defined and is true. It calls the `riscv_remove_unneeded_save_restore_calls()` function, which is used to remove any unnecessary save/restore calls in the generated code." GCC,riscv,933,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the code depends on the specific inputs and environment in which it is executed. However, we can make some educated guesses based on the code snippet provided. The code snippet defines a function called `riscv_reorg` that takes no arguments and has a `void` return type. The function appears to be related to reorganizing data in some way, but the specifics of the reorganization are not clear from the code snippet provided. Without additional context or information about the intended behavior of" GCC,riscv,934,"The next statement of this code snippet is: dwarf = alloc_reg_note(REG_CFA_RESTORE, reg, dwarf);" GCC,riscv,935,"The next statement after the `if` statement in the code snippet you provided is: ``` return const0_rtx; ``` This statement returns the value of `const0_rtx`, which is a constant value of 0." GCC,riscv,936,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return gen_rtx_MEM (VOIDmode, gen_rtx_PLUS (Pmode, frame, GEN_INT (count)));` This statement returns a memory reference to the address of the return address on the stack, which is calculated by adding the value of `count` to the base address of the stack frame. The `gen_rtx_MEM` function is used to create a memory reference, and the `gen_rtx_PLUS` function is used to add the value of `count` to" GCC,riscv,937,"The next statement after the `memset` call is the declaration of a variable `arg` of type `function_arg_info`. The variable is initialized with the result of the `const_cast` expression, which casts the `tree` object `type` to a `function_arg_info` object. The `true` value is passed as the second argument to the `function_arg_info` constructor." GCC,riscv,938,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `memset(&args, , sizeof(args));` This statement sets the value of the `args` structure to all zeros, which is the default value for a `CUMULATIVE_ARGS` structure. The `memset` function is used to set the value of the structure, and the `` placeholder is used to represent the value that should be set. The `sizeof(args)` expression is used to determine the size of the `args` structure, which is necessary for the `mem" GCC,riscv,939,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the code depends on the input parameters and the specific implementation of the `riscv_save_libcall_count` function. However, based on the name of the function and the parameters it takes, it is likely that the function is used to save the number of library calls made by a program. The `mask` parameter is likely used to specify which library calls to count. Without more information about the specific implementation of the function, it is not possible to provide a more detailed prediction of the next" GCC,riscv,940,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `riscv_emit_move` and `riscv_set_frame_expr` functions, as well as the values of the `mem` and `reg` variables. However, based on the names of the functions and the context of the code, it is likely that the next statement will be a call to `riscv_emit_move` with the same arguments as the previous call, or a call to `riscv_set_frame_expr` with a different argument" GCC,riscv,941,"The next statement is likely to be a call to the `gen_rtx_REG` function, which generates a new register operand for the instruction being generated. The function takes two arguments: the first is the mode of the register, which is the same as the mode of the memory operand `mem` in this case; the second is the register number, which is specified by the `regno` variable. The `gen_rtx_REG` function returns a new register operand with the specified mode and register number. This register operand is then passed as an argument to the `fn`" GCC,riscv,942,"The next statement after the code snippet you provided is likely to be a call to the `gen_rtx_MEM` function, which creates a new memory location with the given mode and address. Here's a breakdown of the code snippet you provided: * `gen_frame_mem` is a function that generates a new memory location with the given mode and address. * `mode` is the mode of the memory location being generated. * `plus_constant` is a function that adds a constant value to a memory address. In this case, it adds the value of `" GCC,riscv,943,"The next statement after the code snippet you provided is: `return false;` Explanation: The code snippet you provided is a part of a function that checks whether two operands have the same class (either both integer or both floating-point). If the operands have different classes, the function returns `true`. However, if the operands have the same class, the function checks whether the mode size of the operands is greater than the size of a word, and if the classes of the operands are both floating-point or both integer. If either of these conditions is true," GCC,riscv,944,"The next statement after the `switch` block will be the `default` case, which is the `default_elf_select_section` function call. The `default` case is executed when the value returned by `categorize_decl_for_section` does not match any of the cases in the `switch` block. In this case, the value returned by `categorize_decl_for_section` is not `SECCAT_SRODATA`, so the `default` case is executed. Therefore, the next statement after the `switch` block will be the" GCC,riscv,945,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return get_named_section(decl, , reloc);` This is because the `switch` statement is checking the value of `categorize_decl_for_section(decl, reloc)`, and if it is `SECCAT_SRODATA`, it will return the result of `get_named_section(decl, , reloc)`. Otherwise, it will return the result of `default_elf_select_section(decl, reloc, align)`." GCC,riscv,946,"The code snippet you provided is part of a function that is generating code for a function call. The variable `gp_saved` is being calculated as the maximum number of arguments that can be passed in registers minus the number of local variables that are stored in registers. The variable `ptr` is being set to a pointer to the location on the stack where the arguments will be stored. The next statement of this code snippet will likely be a loop that iterates over the arguments and stores them in the appropriate location on the stack. The loop will likely use the `ptr` variable to keep track of the current location on" GCC,riscv,947,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `cfun->machine->varargs_size = gp_saved * UNITS_PER_WORD;` This statement is assigning the value of `gp_saved * UNITS_PER_WORD` to `cfun->machine->varargs_size`. The `varargs_size` field is used to store the size of the variable arguments passed to a function, and the `gp_saved` variable is used to store the number of general-purpose registers used to pass arguments. The `UNITS_PER_" GCC,riscv,948,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `cfun->machine->interrupt_mode = riscv_get_interrupt_type(decl);` This statement assigns the result of the `riscv_get_interrupt_type` function, which is called with the `decl` parameter, to the `interrupt_mode` field of the `machine` structure in the `cfun` variable. The `interrupt_mode` field is used to store the type of interrupt handler that is being defined." GCC,riscv,949,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `riscv_emit_move ( gen_frame_mem ( GET_MODE ( address ) , slot_address ) , address ) ;` This statement is emitting a move instruction to move the value of `address` to the memory location pointed to by `slot_address`. The `gen_frame_mem` function is used to generate a memory reference expression for the frame pointer, and the `GET_MODE` function is used to get the mode (i.e., the size and alignment) of the memory reference. The `riscv" GCC,riscv,950,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `addr = plus_constant ( Pmode , base , offset ) ;` This statement adds the constant offset to the base register and stores the result in the addr register." GCC,riscv,951,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return g_switch_value && IN_RANGE ( size , , g_switch_value ) ;` This statement is a return statement that returns the result of the logical AND operation between `g_switch_value` and the result of the `IN_RANGE` function. The `IN_RANGE` function checks if the `size` parameter is within a certain range, which is determined by the values of `g_switch_value` and ``. If the `size`" GCC,riscv,952,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet without knowing the specific implementation of the `riscv_slow_unaligned_access` function. However, based on the function name and the parameters it takes, it appears to be a function that checks whether a memory access is slow due to unaligned access. In this code snippet, the function is called with two parameters: `machine_mode` and `unsigned int`. The `machine_mode` parameter is likely a value that indicates the current machine mode (e.g., user mode, supervisor mode, etc.). The `unsigned int` parameter" GCC,riscv,953,"The next statement after the `if` statement is the `return false` statement. The `if` statement checks whether the target is 64-bit and if the source and destination operands are both floating-point registers or if the destination operand is a memory location and the source operand is a floating-point register. If any of these conditions are true, the function returns `false`. Therefore, the next statement after the `if` statement is the `return false` statement, which will be executed if the conditions in the `if` statement are met." GCC,riscv,954,"The code snippet is using the RISC-V instruction set architecture (ISA) and the GCC compiler. The `riscv_const_insns` function is used to generate a sequence of RISC-V instructions that load a constant value into a register. The `riscv_subword` function is used to extract a subword (i.e., a portion of a word) from a larger word. The code snippet is initializing two variables, `low` and `high`, to the number of RISC-V instructions required to load a constant value into a" GCC,riscv,955,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be: `rtx high_dest = riscv_subword ( dest , true ) ;` This statement is assigning the high part of the destination register to the `high_dest` variable, which is likely to be used for the next part of the move operation." GCC,riscv,956,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `riscv_emit_move(low_dest, riscv_subword(src, false));` This statement is executed if the condition `REG_P(low_dest) && reg_overlap_mentioned_p(low_dest, src)` is true. It moves the value of the low part of `src` to `low_dest`." GCC,riscv,957,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be a call to the `riscv_move_integer` function, which moves an integer value from one register to another. The function takes four arguments: the destination register, the source register, the integer value to be moved, and a boolean flag indicating whether the move should be performed atomically. In this case, the destination register is `hi`, the source register is `hi`, the integer value to be moved is `hival`, and the boolean flag is `FALSE`. The function will move the value of `hival` from the `hi` register" GCC,riscv,958,"The next statement of this code snippet is: return gen_rtx_fmt_ee ( PLUS , mode , hi , lo ) ; This statement is a return statement that returns a new RTX expression with the PLUS operation applied to the two operands, hi and lo. The PLUS operation is a binary operation that takes two operands and returns their sum. In this case, the operands are hi and lo, which are both RTX expressions. The return value of this statement is a new RTX expression that represents the sum of hi and lo." GCC,riscv,959,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `cost = + riscv_build_integer ( codes , loval , VOIDmode ) ;` This statement assigns the value of `riscv_build_integer ( codes , loval , VOIDmode )` to `cost`, which is a variable of type `unsigned HOST_WIDE_INT`. The `riscv_build_integer` function is called with the `codes` array, the `loval` variable, and the `VOIDmode` constant as arguments. The `" GCC,riscv,960,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `cost += riscv_build_integer(codes, hival, VOIDmode);` This statement is executed if `loval` is not equal to `hival`, which means that the `if` condition is true. Therefore, the `cost` variable is incremented by the result of the `riscv_build_integer` function, which is called with the `codes` array, `hival` as the second argument, and `VOIDmode` as the third argument." GCC,riscv,961,"The next statement in the code snippet is: * low_out = gen_rtx_LO_SUM ( Pmode, high, addr ); Explanation: The code snippet is part of a function that is generating RTL (Register Transfer Language) code for the RISC-V instruction set architecture. The function is handling the case where the address is a symbolic reference, specifically a PC-relative symbolic reference. The code first generates a high part of the address using the gen_rtx_HIGH function, which takes a mode and an address as arguments" GCC,riscv,962,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `emit_insn (gen_auipcdi (temp, copy_rtx (addr), GEN_INT (seqno)))`" GCC,riscv,963,"The next statement of the code snippet is: `if (symbol_type == SYMBOL_TLS_LE) return true;` This statement checks if the `symbol_type` is equal to `SYMBOL_TLS_LE`. If it is, the function returns `true`. If it is not, the function continues to the next statement." GCC,riscv,964,"Based on the code snippet you provided, it appears to be checking if a particular instruction is a memory operation (specifically, a store operation). If the instruction is a store operation, it checks if the destination is a memory location, and if so, it checks if the instruction is a single set (i.e., it only sets one value). The code snippet also appears to be using the `MEM_P` macro to check if the destination is a memory location, and the `single_set` function to check if the instruction is a single set. Without more context, it's" GCC,riscv,965,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet without knowing the specific values of the variables `base` and `offset`, as well as the implementation of the functions `UNSPEC_ADDRESS_P`, `plus_constant`, and `INTVAL`. However, based on the names of the functions and variables, it appears that this code is checking if the address of a base variable is a special address, and if so, it is adding a constant value to the address. The constant value is obtained by calling the `INTVAL` function on the `offset` variable." GCC,riscv,966,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `if ( MEM_P ( op ) ) return adjust_address ( op , word_mode , byte ) ;` This statement checks if the operand `op` is a memory operand, and if so, it returns the result of the `adjust_address` function with the operand `op`, the word mode, and the byte value as arguments. If the operand is not a memory operand, the code continues to the next statement." GCC,riscv,967,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return adjust_address ( op , word_mode , byte ) ;` This statement is executed if the `MEM_P ( op )` condition is true, which means that the `op` operand is a memory operand. The `adjust_address` function is called with the `op` operand, the `word_mode` mode, and the `byte` value as arguments. The `adjust_address` function adjusts the address of the memory operand to point to the correct location in memory." GCC,riscv,968,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the `riscv_swap_instruction` function is not specified. However, based on the name of the function, it is likely that it is intended to swap the operands of the instruction represented by the `inst` parameter. Therefore, the next statement of the code snippet is likely to be a call to a function that swaps the operands of the instruction." GCC,riscv,969,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `inst = gen_rtx_SET (VOIDmode, operands[0], operands[1]);` This statement is setting the `inst` variable to a new value, which is a `SET` instruction with the same operands as the original `inst` variable. The `VOIDmode` parameter is used to indicate that the instruction does not have a return value." GCC,riscv,970,The next statement after the `switch` statement is `default : return false ;`. GCC,riscv,971,The next statement after the `if` block is `else return false;`. GCC,riscv,972,"The next statement after the `if` block would be the `return` statement, which returns the result of the `gen_tls_add_tp_ledi` function." GCC,riscv,973,"The next statement after the `if` block would be the `return` statement, which returns the result of the `gen_tls_add_tp_ledi` function." GCC,riscv,974,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be: mem = adjust_address ( m_tramp , SImode , * GET_MODE_SIZE ( SImode ) ) ; This is because the previous statement ends with a call to riscv_emit_move, which is likely to be a function that emits a move instruction to the target address. The next statement is likely to be an adjustment to the target address, which is done using the adjust_address function. The function takes the target address, the mode size, and the number of liter" GCC,riscv,975,"The next statement in this code snippet is: `prefix = "".srodata"";` This is because the `categorize_decl_for_section` function returns `SECCAT_SRODATA`, which is a constant representing the ""srodata"" section category. The `prefix` variable is then assigned the value of the section name for this category, which is "".srodata""." GCC,riscv,976,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `string = ACONCAT((linkonce, prefix, , name, NULL));` This statement is concatenating several strings together to form a new string. The strings being concatenated are: * `linkonce`: a string literal that is either """" or ""_1"" depending on the value of the `one_only` variable. * `prefix`: a string literal that is the prefix for the name of the variable being declared. * `save_libcall_adjustment != ;` This statement is executed if the `if` condition is true, which means that the function `riscv_use_save_libcall` will return `false` if the `if` condition is true. The `if` condition is `! TARGET_SAVE_RESTORE || crtl->calls_eh_return || frame_pointer_needed || cfun->machine->interrupt_handler_p" GCC,riscv,982,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return ( REG_P ( x ) && riscv_regno_mode_ok_for_base_p ( REGNO ( x ) , mode , strict_p ) ) ;` This statement is a return statement that returns a boolean value indicating whether the register `x` is a valid base register for the given mode and strictness. The `REG_P` macro checks if `x` is a register, and `riscv_regno_mode_ok_for_base_p` checks if the register number of" GCC,riscv,983,"The next statement after the `if` block will be the assignment `x = SUBREG_REG ( x ) ;`. The `if` block checks if `strict_p` is false and if the `GET_CODE` of `x` is `SUBREG`. If both conditions are true, the `if` block will execute and assign the result of `SUBREG_REG ( x )` to `x`. Therefore, the next statement after the `if` block will be the assignment `x = SUBREG_REG ( x ) ;`, which will assign the result of `" GCC,riscv,984,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `align = riscv_symbol_align ( sym_type );` This is because the code is checking the alignment of the symbol, which is determined by the `riscv_symbol_align` function. The function takes the symbol type as an argument, and returns the alignment of the symbol. The code then checks if the alignment is less than or equal to the size of the symbol, and if so, it returns false." GCC,riscv,985,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `align = ( SYMBOL_REF_DECL ( x ) ? DECL_ALIGN ( SYMBOL_REF_DECL ( x ) ) : ) ;` This statement is assigning the value of `align` to be the alignment of the symbol `x`, which is obtained by calling the `DECL_ALIGN` function on the declaration of `x` if it is a symbol reference, or to `` otherwise." GCC,riscv,986,"The next statement after the given code snippet is: `return false;` Explanation: The first `if` statement checks if `x` is a constant arithmetic operand in the specified mode. If it is not, the function returns `false`. The second `if` statement checks if the mode size is greater than the number of units per word, and if the operand is not a small operand. If either of these conditions is true, the function returns `false`. Therefore, the next statement after the given code snippet is `return false;`, which is" GCC,riscv,987,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `std_expand_builtin_va_start(valist, nextarg);` This statement is calling the `std_expand_builtin_va_start` function, which is a built-in function in the RISC-V instruction set. The function takes two arguments: `valist`, which is a tree representing the variable argument list, and `nextarg`, which is the next argument to be processed. The function will expand the variable argument list and set up the stack frame for the function call." GCC,riscv,988,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return !riscv_naked_function_p(decl);` This statement returns the negation of the result of the `riscv_naked_function_p` function, which is called with the `decl` parameter. The `riscv_naked_function_p` function is not defined in the code snippet you provided, so it is not possible to determine its exact behavior. However, based on the name of the function, it appears to be related to checking whether a function is a ""naked"" function, which is a" GCC,riscv,989,"The code snippet is using the `expand_binop` function to perform a binary operation on two operands, `cmp0` and `cmp1`. The function takes several arguments, including the mode of the operation, the sub_optab, and two operands. The `if` statement checks whether `cmp1` is equal to `const0_rtx`, and if so, returns `cmp0`. Otherwise, it returns the result of calling `expand_binop` with the given arguments. Therefore, the next statement of this code snippet would be the call to `expand_" GCC,riscv,990,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return cmp0;`" GCC,riscv,991,"The next statement in the code snippet is: `__asm__ __volatile__ ( : ( rv ) : : ) ;` This is a GNU C inline assembly statement, which is used to execute a small piece of assembly code within a C program. The statement is enclosed in a `__volatile__` block, which means that the compiler will not optimize the assembly code away, and it will be executed exactly as written. The assembly code itself is a simple instruction that loads the value of the" GCC,riscv,992,"This code snippet appears to be part of a switch statement in a C program. The switch statement is checking the value of a variable `rv` and executing different code based on the value of `rv`. The first case is `RVV_VXRM`, which is a macro that expands to a string literal. The code inside the case statement is an assembly code that is using the `asm` keyword to inline assembly code into the C program. The assembly code is using the `volatile` keyword to indicate that the assembly code has side effects and should not be optimized away by the compiler." GCC,riscv,993,"The next statement in this code snippet is: `__asm__ __volatile__ ( ""csrrw x0, 0x080, %0"" : : ""r"" (value) : ""memory"" );` Explanation: The `switch` statement is checking the value of the `csr` parameter, which is an enumeration of the RISC-V vector extension CSRs. The `case` statement for `RVV_VSTART` is handling the case where the `csr` parameter is equal to `RVV_" GCC,riscv,994,"The next statement of this code snippet is: *base = XEXP (addr, ); *offset = XEXP (addr, ); return true;" GCC,riscv,995,"The next statement after the `else` block is: * base_ptr = x;" GCC,riscv,996,"The next statement after the `if` statement is the `return` statement. The `return` statement is used to return a value from a function. In this case, the function is returning `true` if the condition in the `if` statement is met, or `false` otherwise. The `reversed` variable is being set to `true` or `false` depending on the condition in the `if` statement. If the condition is met, `reversed` is set to `true`, otherwise it is set to `false`. The `return` statement is used" GCC,riscv,997,"The next statement after the `if` statement is the `return` statement. The `if` statement checks whether `base` is a register or not. If it is not a register, the function returns `true`. If it is a register, the function checks whether the register number of `base` is equal to the register number of `reg1` or `reg2`. If it is, the function returns `true`. Otherwise, the function returns `false`. Therefore, the next statement after the `if` statement is the `return` statement, which returns the result of the comparison." GCC,riscv,998,"The next statement after the `if` statement is: `bool reversed = false;` This statement declares a variable `reversed` of type `bool` and initializes it to `false`." GCC,riscv,999,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `rtx base; HOST_WIDE_INT offset; split_plus (XEXP (mem, ), &base, &offset);` This statement is assigning the `base` and `offset` variables to the result of the `split_plus` function, which is used to split a memory address into a base and offset. The `split_plus` function takes three arguments: the memory address to be split, a pointer to a variable to store the base address, and a pointer to a variable to store the" GCC,riscv,1000,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `int mem_op = load_p ? : ;` This statement is assigning the value of `mem_op` to be either `` or `` depending on the value of `load_p`. If `load_p` is true, then `mem_op` is assigned the value of ``, otherwise it is assigned the value of ``." GCC,riscv,1001,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `if ( reversed ) { std :: swap ( operands [ ] , operands [ ] ) ; std :: swap ( operands [ ] , operands [ ] ) ; }` This is because the `if` statement checks the value of the `reversed` variable, and if it is true, it executes the code inside the `if` block. The code inside the `if` block is the `std::swap`" GCC,riscv,1002,"The next statement is likely to be: output_operands[0] = copy_rtx(reg1); Explanation: The code snippet you provided is part of a function that appears to be generating assembly code for a memory access operation. The function is checking various conditions and asserting that they are true before proceeding with the generation of the assembly code. The last statement in the code snippet is the assignment of a value to the `output_operands` array. The next statement is likely to be the assignment of a value to the next element of the `output" GCC,riscv,1003,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be: output_operands [ ] = copy_rtx ( reg2 ) ; This is because the code is using the `output_operands` array to store the operands of the instruction being generated, and the previous statement is storing the first operand in `output_operands[]`. The next statement is likely to store the second operand in the same array." GCC,riscv,1004,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the program depends on the specific values of the variables and the implementation of the functions being called. However, based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the program is generating a memory access instruction, and the next statement is likely to be the generation of the instruction itself. The `gen_frame_mem` function appears to be generating a memory access instruction, and the `gen_rtx_REG` function is being used to generate a register operand for the instruction. The `operands` array is" GCC,riscv,1005,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet without knowing the specific values of the variables and the context in which the code is being executed. However, based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the next statement will be related to the generation of a memory reference using the `gen_frame_mem` function. The code snippet defines two variables, `reg_op` and `mem_op`, which are initialized to either `` or `` depending on the value of the `load_p` variable. It then defines two memory references, `mem" GCC,riscv,1006,"Based on the code snippet you provided, it appears that the next statement will be: RTX_FRAME_RELATED_P(insn) = ; This is because the previous statement, add_reg_note(insn, REG_CFA_RESTORE, operands[]), adds a note to the insn rtx indicating that the register operands[] should be restored from the stack frame. The next statement, RTX_FRAME_RELATE" GCC,riscv,1007,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be a call to the `emit_insn` function, which will emit the instruction represented by the `insn` variable. The `emit_insn` function takes an `rtx` object as its argument, and in this case, the `insn` variable is an `rtx` object representing a parallel instruction with two operands, `set1` and `set2`. The `emit_insn` function will then generate the necessary machine code to execute the instruction represented by the `insn` variable, and it will return a" GCC,riscv,1008,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet without knowing the specific implementation of the `th_mempair_save_restore_regs` function and the values of the `operands` array. However, based on the name of the function and the parameters passed to it, it appears that the function is responsible for saving and restoring registers for a thread. The `operands` array is an array of `rtx` values, which are used to represent the operands of an instruction. The `load_p` parameter is a boolean value that indicates whether the function should load" GCC,riscv,1009,"This is a function definition in C language. It is a member function of the `th_mempair_save_restore` class, and it is named `th_mempair_save_restore_regs`. The function takes three arguments: * `operands`: an array of `rtx` objects, which are used to represent the operands of the instruction being processed. * `load_p`: a boolean value that indicates whether the function is being called to load or store registers. If `load_p` is true, the function is being called to load" GCC,arc,0,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific values of the variables and the behavior of the functions being called. However, based on the names of the functions being called, it appears that this code is related to the definition of macros in a C preprocessor. The `builtin_define` function is likely used to define a macro with the name `NAME` and the value `CONDITION`. The `def_or_undef_macro` function is then called to define or undefine the macro based on the value of `CON" GCC,arc,1,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific inputs and the behavior of the `def_or_undef_macro` function. However, based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the next statement will be a call to the `builtin_define` function with a string literal argument. The `builtin_define` function is used to define a macro with the specified name and value. The `def_or_undef_macro` function is used to define or undefine a macro based on a condition. The `built" GCC,arc,2,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific values of the macros and variables used in the code. However, based on the information provided, it appears that the code is defining a set of macros and constants for a target architecture. The first statement, `builtin_assert ( ) ;`, is likely asserting that a certain condition is true, where `` is a string literal that represents the condition. The second statement, `builtin_define ( ` and `NAME`, which are both string literals. The third argument is a condition that is evaluated at runtime to determine whether the macro should be defined or undefined." GCC,arc,4,"This code snippet is defining some preprocessor macros using the `builtin_define_with_int_value` and `builtin_define` functions. The macros being defined are: * `arc_tp_regno`: This macro is defined with the value of `arc_tp_regno`, which is a register number. * `arc_lpcwidth`: This macro is defined with the value of `arc_lpcwidth`, which is a width value. * `TARGET_BIG_ENDIAN`: This macro is defined with the value of `T" GCC,arc,5,"The next statement in this code snippet is likely to be a conditional statement, such as an if or switch statement, that checks the value of the TARGET_BIG_ENDIAN or TARGET_HARD_FLOAT macros. The purpose of these macros is to determine the target architecture and floating-point format, and to define the appropriate macros for the target. The code snippet is likely part of a larger program that is responsible for generating code for a specific target architecture, and the macros defined in this snippet are used to control the generation of code for that target. The" GCC,arc,6,"The next statement after the `if` statement in the code snippet is `cpp_define ( pfile , name ) ;`." GCC,arc,7,"The next statement in the code snippet is: `else cpp_undef ( pfile , name ) ;`" GCC,arc,8,"The next statement is: `switch (GET_CODE (plus1)) {`" GCC,arc,9,"Based on the code snippet provided, it is difficult to predict the next statement with certainty. However, based on the context and the patterns present in the code, it is likely that the next statement will be a conditional statement that checks the value of the `GET_CODE` macro on the `plus0` and `plus1` variables. The `GET_CODE` macro is used to extract the opcode of an RTL expression, which is a representation of a machine instruction or a part of an instruction. The `plus0` and `plus1` variables are RTL expressions that are being used as" GCC,arc,10,"Based on the code snippet you provided, it appears that the next statement after the `switch` statement will be the `break` statement. The `switch` statement is checking the value of `get_attr_type(pred)` and `get_attr_type(succ)`, and based on those values, it is returning a specific value. However, if the values of `pred` and `succ` do not match any of the cases in the `switch` statement, the code will execute the `default` case, which is the `break` statement. Therefore, the next statement" GCC,arc,11,"The next statement after the `if` block is the `return` statement. The `return` statement will return the value of the expression `true` if the condition in the `if` statement is true, and it will return the value of the expression `false` if the condition is false. So, the next statement after the `if` block is: ``` return true; ```" GCC,arc,12,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return true;` Explanation: The code snippet is checking if `op` is a register and if its register number is within a certain range. If `op` is not a register, the function returns `false`. If `op` is a register and its register number is within the specified range, the function returns `true`. Otherwise, the function returns `false`. So, if the code reaches the last line, it means that `op` is a register and its register number is not within the specified range, so the function" GCC,arc,13,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `size_to_deallocate -= arc_restore_callee_saves ( , false , restore_fp , first_offset , size_to_deallocate ) ;` This statement is part of the `if ( ARC_INTERRUPT_P ( fn_type ) )` block, and it is used to restore the callee-saved registers that were saved in the interrupt handler. The `arc_restore_callee_saves` function is called with the appropriate arguments" GCC,arc,14,"The next statement of this code snippet is: intval = (REG_P(operands[]) ? : CONST_INT_P(operands[]) ? INTVAL(operands[]) : ); This is a ternary operator, which is a shorthand for an if-else statement. The condition is REG_P(operands[]), and if it is true, the value of" GCC,arc,15,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be the initialization of the `reg` and `mem` variables, which are used to store the register and memory operands for the `SET` instructions that will be generated. The code snippet is part of a function that generates RTL (Register Transfer Language) code for a function prologue, and it is responsible for allocating space on the stack for the function's local variables and saving the values of certain registers on the stack. The `reg` and `mem` variables are used to represent the registers and memory locations involved in the `SET` instructions, and" GCC,arc,16,"Based on the code snippet you provided, it appears to be part of a function that is generating a sequence of instructions to save registers on the stack. The function is using a loop to iterate over a range of registers and generate instructions to save each register on the stack. The next statement in the code snippet is: `XVECEXP ( insn , , indx ) = gen_rtx_SET ( mem , reg ) ;` This statement is setting the `indx`th element of the `insn` vector to a new `rtx" GCC,arc,17,"The next statement after the `switch` statement in the code snippet you provided is the `default` case. The `default` case is executed when none of the other cases match the value of the `arc_tune_archs` variable. In this case, the `default` case is empty, so no further action is taken. The program will continue executing the next statement after the `switch` statement." GCC,arc,18,"The next statement of this code snippet is: *pretend_size = (MAX_ARC_PARM_REGS - first_reg_offset) * UNITS_PER_WORD;" GCC,arc,19,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `xop[] = gen_rtx_REG(SImode, REGNO(operands[]));` This statement is assigning a new value to the `xop` array element at index ``. The new value is a register with the same mode as the `operands` array element at index ``. The register is created using the `gen_rtx_REG` function, which takes the mode and the register number as" GCC,arc,20,"The next statement of this code snippet is: xop[ + i] = operand_subword(operands[i], , , mode);" GCC,arc,21,"The next statement of this code snippet is: operands[] = gen_rtx_PLUS(SImode, operands[], operands[]);" GCC,arc,22,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `operands[] = gen_rtx_PLUS(SImode, operands[], operands[]);`" GCC,arc,23,"Based on the code snippet you provided, it appears to be a part of a function that is generating RTL (Register Transfer Language) code for the GNU Compiler Collection (GCC). The function takes an integer value `val` as input and performs different operations based on the value of `val`. If `val` is less than a certain value (represented by ``), the function generates a NEG (negate) instruction for the value. If `val` is greater than or equal to a certain value (represented by ``), the function" GCC,arc,24,"Based on the code snippet provided, it appears to be a part of a function that is performing some arithmetic operations on the operands. The function is checking if the operands are short registers and if the value of the first operand is within a certain range. If the value is within the range, the function is negating the second operand and adding it to the first operand. If the value is not within the range, the function is subtracting the second operand from the first operand. Therefore, the next statement of this code snippet is likely to be the negation of the second operand" GCC,arc,25,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `if ( ! TARGET_ARC700 ) return ;` This statement is a conditional return statement that checks if the target architecture is not ARC700, and if so, returns from the function." GCC,arc,26,"The next statement is: `return;`" GCC,arc,27,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return ;` The function `arc_ccfsm_branch_deleted_p` checks the current state of the CCFSM and returns a boolean value indicating whether the branch is deleted or not. The function uses a simple if-else statement to determine the return value. If the current state is equal to `` or ``, the function returns `true`, otherwise it returns `false`." GCC,arc,28,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return ;` The function `arc_ccfsm_branch_deleted_p` checks the current state of the CCFSM and returns a boolean value indicating whether the branch is deleted or not. The function uses a simple if-else statement to determine the return value. If the current state is equal to `` or ``, the function returns `true`, otherwise it returns `false`." GCC,arc,29,"The next statement of this code snippet is: arc_ccfsm_state += ; This statement increments the value of the variable arc_ccfsm_state by the value of the constant NUM_LIT." GCC,arc,30,"The next statement of this code snippet is: arc_ccfsm_state += ; This is because the code snippet is updating the value of the variable `arc_ccfsm_state` by adding the value of the constant `NUM_LIT` to it. The statement `current_insn_set_cc_p = last_insn_set_cc_p` is not the next statement, as it is a separate assignment statement that is not dependent on the previous line of code." GCC,arc,31,"The next statement after the `if` statement is: `(void) arc_compute_frame_size(get_frame_size());` This statement is executed if the `if` condition is true, which means that the `arc_compute_function_type` function returned a value that is not equal to `ARC_FUNCTION_NORMAL`. The `arc_compute_frame_size` function is called with the result of the `get_frame_size` function as its argument. The `void` keyword is used to indicate that the function does not return a" GCC,arc,32,"The next statement after the `if` statement is: `if ( ! current_frame_info . initialized ) ( void ) arc_compute_frame_size ( get_frame_size ( ) ) ;` This statement checks if the `current_frame_info` structure has been initialized. If it has not been initialized, it calls the `arc_compute_frame_size` function with the result of `get_frame_size` as an argument. The `void` keyword is used to indicate that the function does not return a value. Therefore, the next statement after" GCC,arc,33,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the `arc_finalize_pic` function is not specified. However, based on the name of the function, it is likely that it is related to the finalization of the PIC (Position-Independent Code) of the ARC (Argon/Argon2) processor. The `arc_finalize_pic` function may be responsible for performing any necessary cleanup or finalization tasks related to the PIC, such as releasing resources or resetting the PIC state." GCC,arc,34,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the `arc_finalize_pic` function is not specified. However, based on the name of the function, it is likely that it is related to the finalization of the PIC (Position-Independent Code) of the ARC (Argon/Argon2) processor. The `arc_finalize_pic` function may be responsible for performing any necessary cleanup or finalization tasks related to the PIC, such as releasing resources or resetting the PIC state." GCC,arc,35,"Based on the code snippet you provided, it appears to be a part of a program that is setting up the CPU and memory for an embedded system. The code is initializing various variables and arrays, and setting up the CPU and memory for use by the program. The next statement in the code snippet is: arc_text_section = tmp = xmalloc ( strlen ( arc_text_string ) + sizeof ( ARC_SECTION_FORMAT ) + ) ; This statement is allocating memory for the text section of the program using the xmalloc function" GCC,arc,36,"Based on the code snippet you provided, it appears to be part of a function that is attempting to determine the value of a memory address. The function is using a switch statement to check the type of the memory address and return a value based on that type. The next statement in the code snippet is: case PLUS : { register rtx plus0 = XEXP ( addr , ) ; register rtx plus1 = XEXP ( addr , ) ; if ( GET_CODE ( plus0 ) != REG ) break ; switch (" GCC,arc,37,"This code snippet appears to be part of a compiler or interpreter for a programming language. It is difficult to determine the exact behavior of the code without more context, but based on the syntax and the names of the variables, it appears to be related to the handling of arithmetic operations, specifically the addition of two operands. The code defines a `case` statement that handles the `PLUS` operation. It extracts the two operands of the addition using the `XEXP` function, and then checks the type of the second operand using the `GET_CODE` function. If the second operand is" GCC,arc,38,"The next statement after the `if` block is `return default_assemble_integer ( x , size , aligned_p ) ;`. The `if` block checks if the `size` is equal to `UNITS_PER_WORD`, `aligned_p` is true, and the `GET_CODE` of `x` is either `SYMBOL_REF` or `LABEL_REF`. If all of these conditions are true, then the `if` block is executed, which prints a string literal to the output file, outputs the address of `x`, and prints another string" GCC,arc,39,"The next statement after `fputs ( , asm_out_file ) ; output_addr_const ( asm_out_file , x ) ; fputs ( , asm_out_file ) ;` is `return true ;`. The code snippet is part of a function that appears to be assembling a constant value into an output file. The first `fputs` statement writes a string literal to the output file, followed by a call to `output_addr_const` which appears to be a function that writes" GCC,arc,40,"Based on the code snippet you provided, it appears to be a function that is part of a compiler or interpreter for a programming language. The function is named `arc_ccfsm_at_label` and it takes two arguments: `prefix`, which is a string, and `num`, which is an integer. The function appears to be checking the current state of the compiler or interpreter, which is stored in the variable `arc_ccfsm_state`. If the current state is equal to `` and the target label is equal to `num`, and the prefix is equal to `<" GCC,arc,41,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return ;` The `if` statement checks if `arc_ccfsm_state` is equal to `` or ``. If it is, the function returns ``. Otherwise, it returns ``." GCC,arc,42,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return ;` The `if` statement checks if `arc_ccfsm_state` is equal to `` or ``. If it is, the function returns ``. Otherwise, it returns ``." GCC,arc,43,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the code depends on the specific values of the variables and the logic of the program. However, based on the information provided, we can make some educated guesses about the possible next statements. The code snippet is incrementing the value of the variable `arc_ccfsm_state` by the value of the constant ``. This suggests that the next statement may involve updating the value of `arc_ccfsm_state` based on the new value of the variable." GCC,arc,44,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be: `total_size = ARC_STACK_ALIGN(total_size);` This is because the previous line of code sets `total_size` to the sum of several variables, and the next line of code aligns `total_size` to a specific boundary using the `ARC_STACK_ALIGN` macro." GCC,arc,45,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `fn_type = ARC_FUNCTION_NORMAL;`" GCC,arc,46,"The next statement after the `if` statement is the `return` statement. The `return` statement will return the value of the `current_frame_info.total_size` variable, which is assigned the value of `` in the previous statement. Therefore, the next statement of this code snippet will be: ``` return ; ```" GCC,arc,47,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return ( ( ( unsigned HOST_WIDE_INT ) low <= && high == ) || ( ( ( low & - ( unsigned HOST_WIDE_INT ) ) == - ( unsigned HOST_WIDE_INT ) ) && high == - ) ) ;` This statement is a return statement that returns a boolean value indicating whether the given value is a valid constant double. The return value" GCC,arc,48,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be a `return` statement, as it is the last line of the `if` block. The `return` statement will return a value of `` to the caller of the function." GCC,arc,49,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be a call to the `fprintf` function, which is used to format and print data to a file. The function takes a file pointer, a format string, and a variable number of arguments, which are used to format the output. In this case, the format string is ``, which is a string literal that contains a format specifier for a string. The two `XSTR` functions are used to convert the `SYMREF` and `NUM_LIT` values to strings, which are then passed as arguments to the" GCC,arc,50,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the program depends on the specific implementation of the `default_file_start` function and the input data. However, based on the name of the function, it is likely that it is a function that initializes or sets up the default file for the program. The `default_file_start` function may perform tasks such as creating a new file, setting the file name and path, and opening the file for reading or writing. Without more information about the specific implementation of the `default_file" GCC,arc,51,"The next statement of this code snippet is: fprintf ( asm_out_file , , arc_cpu_string ) ; This statement is calling the fprintf function to print a string to the output file. The string is contained in the arc_cpu_string variable, which is presumably a string that contains the name of the CPU architecture being used. The placeholder is used to indicate that the string should be printed as a literal string, without any formatting or escaping." GCC,arc,52,"Based on the code snippet you provided, it appears that the next statement will be: `case BARRIER:` This is because the `switch` statement is checking the code of the current instruction, and the `BARRIER` instruction is one of the possible cases. The code will then execute the statements associated with the `BARRIER` case, which in this case appears to be setting a flag to indicate that the next instruction must be a target label." GCC,arc,53,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return strcmp(arg, ) == || ARC_EXTENSION_CPU(arg);` This statement is a `return` statement that returns the result of the `strcmp` function, which compares the string `arg` with the string literal ``. If the strings are equal, the `strcmp` function returns 0, which is compared to the integer literal `` using the `==` operator. If the comparison is true," GCC,arc,54,"The next statement of this code snippet is: arc_punct_chars['""'] = ; Explanation: The code snippet is initializing the array arc_punct_chars with the ASCII values of some punctuation characters. The memset function is used to set all the elements of the array to a specific value, which is in this case. Then, the individual elements of the array are assigned specific values using the array subscript operator []. The next statement is assigning the ASCII value of the double quote character ('" GCC,arc,55,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `arc_initialize_trampoline ( tramp, fnaddr, cxt );` This statement calls the `arc_initialize_trampoline` function with the `tramp`, `fnaddr`, and `cxt` arguments. The `arc_initialize_trampoline` function is not defined in the code snippet you provided, so it is not possible to determine what it does or what its return value is." GCC,arc,56,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `arc_initialize_trampoline ( tramp, fnaddr, cxt );` This statement calls the `arc_initialize_trampoline` function with the `tramp`, `fnaddr`, and `cxt` arguments. The `arc_initialize_trampoline` function is not defined in the code snippet you provided, so it is not possible to determine what it does or what its return value is." GCC,arc,57,"Based on the code snippet you provided, it appears that the next statement will be: `arc_mode_class[i] = << (int) C_MODE;` This is because the previous `if` statement checked if `GET_MODE_SIZE(i) == `, and since that condition was not met, the next `if` statement that will be executed is the one that checks if `GET_MODE_SIZE(i) == `. If that condition is met, then the statement `arc_mode" GCC,arc,58,"Based on the code snippet you provided, it appears that the `arc_mode_class` array is being initialized with values based on the mode of the instruction. The `switch` statement is checking the mode of the instruction and setting the corresponding value in the `arc_mode_class` array. Here's a breakdown of the code snippet: 1. The `switch` statement is checking the value of `i`, which is the mode of the instruction. 2. The `case MODE_COMPLEX_INT` block is checking if the mode is `MODE_COMPLEX" GCC,arc,59,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `fprintf(stream, ""%s%lu"", prefix, labelno);`" GCC,arc,60,"The next statement of this code snippet is: fprintf ( file , , sp_str , sp_str ) ; This statement is part of the if-else block that checks whether the function type is an interrupt function. If it is, it prints a string to the file using the sp_str and sp_str arguments." GCC,arc,61,"Based on the code snippet you provided, it appears to be a part of a function that is generating assembly code for a stack frame. The function is using the `fprintf` function to print out various pieces of information about the stack frame, such as the size of the frame, the size of the variables, and the size of the return address. The next statement in the code snippet is: ``` size = ARC_STACK_ALIGN ( size ) ; ``` This statement is aligning the size of the stack frame to a multiple of 16 bytes, which is the alignment requirement" GCC,arc,62,"The next statement of this code snippet is: fputs ( reg_names [ REGNO ( base ) ] , file ) ; This statement is part of the case PLUS block, which is executed when the address is a sum of two or more values. In this case, the statement outputs the register name of the base register, which is the first operand of the PLUS expression. The register name is obtained using the REGNO macro, which returns the register number of the given register. The register number is then used to index into the reg_names array, which contains the names of" GCC,arc,63,"The next statement of the code snippet is: `if (size == 0) return true;` This statement checks if the size of the type is equal to 0, and if it is, it returns true." GCC,arc,64,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return false;` This is because the `else` block is executed when the `if` condition is not met, and the `return false;` statement is the last statement in the `else` block." GCC,arc,65,"The next statement in the code snippet is: *total = COSTS_N_INSNS(); Explanation: The code snippet is a switch statement that is checking the type of the rtx x. The current case is ASHIFT or ASHIFTRT, and the next statement is to calculate the cost of the instruction. The cost is calculated using the COSTS_N_INSNS macro, which takes the number of instructions as an argument. The number of instructions is obtained by calling the SMALL_INT macro" GCC,arc,66,"The next statement of this code snippet is: fprintf(file, , op, reg_names[regno], base_reg, offset); This is because the code is inside a loop that iterates over the registers, and the loop body is executed for each register. The statement fprintf(file, , op, reg_names[regno], base_reg, offset); is inside the loop body, so it will be executed for each iteration of the loop." GCC,arc,67,"The next statement of this code snippet is: fprintf(file, , op, reg_names[regno], base_reg, offset);" GCC,arc,68,The next statement after `return CCZNmode;` is `case ASHIFT:`. GCC,arc,69,"The next statement of this code snippet is: int size = MAX_ARC_PARM_REGS - first_reg_offset;" GCC,arc,70,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `nextarg = plus_constant ( nextarg , UNITS_PER_WORD ) ;` This statement is executed if the following conditions are true: * `current_function_args_info < ` * `(current_function_args_info & )` If these conditions are true, then the `nextarg` variable is assigned the value of `plus_constant ( nextarg , UNITS_PER_WORD )`, which is the result of adding `UNIT" GCC,arc,71,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return ( symbolic_operand ( op , mode ) || ( GET_CODE ( op ) == CONST_INT && LEGITIMATE_CONSTANT_P ( op ) ) || ( GET_CODE ( op ) == REG ) ) ;` This statement is a return statement that returns a boolean value indicating whether the given operand is a symbolic operand, a constant integer that is a legitimate constant, or a register. The `symbolic_operand` function is called with the operand and the mode as" GCC,arc,72,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the `call_operand` function is dependent on the specific implementation of the function and the input parameters. However, based on the name of the function and the parameters it takes, it is likely that the function is used to generate a call instruction for the operand `op` in the specified `mode`. The function may return a value that represents the call instruction, or it may have some other effect on the program state. Without more information about the specific implementation of the function, it is not possible to provide" GCC,arc,73,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `op = XEXP ( op , ) ;` This statement is assigning the result of `XEXP` to `op`. The `XEXP` function is a macro that expands to an expression that extracts a subexpression from an RTL expression. In this case, it is extracting the subexpression at position `` from `op`. The result of this expression is then assigned to `op`." GCC,arc,74,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be a comparison of the value of `op` with a constant integer value. The comparison is being done using the `INTVAL` function, which returns the integer value of a constant integer operand. The comparison is checking if the value of `op` is greater than or equal to `- - ` and less than or equal to ``. The `` placeholders represent constant integer values that are not known at the time of writing the code. There" GCC,arc,75,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be a comparison of the value of `op` with the constants `` and ``. The comparison is likely to be done using the `INTVAL` function, which returns the integer value of a constant expression. The code snippet is likely to be part of a function that takes a single argument `op`, which is expected to be a constant integer expression. The function is checking whether the value of `op` falls within a certain range, which is defined by the two constants ``. If the" GCC,arc,76,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be the return statement, which returns the value of the `const_uint32_operand` function. The function takes two arguments: `op`, which is a pointer to an `rtx` object, and `mode`, which is an `enum machine_mode` value. The function returns a `const_uint32_operand` value, which is a 32-bit unsigned integer. The function body is not provided in the code snippet, so it is not possible to determine the exact behavior of the function. However, based on" GCC,arc,77,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `emit_insn ( gen_rtx_SET ( VOIDmode , cc_reg , gen_rtx_COMPARE ( mode , x , y ) ) ) ;` This statement is emitting an instruction that sets the value of `cc_reg` to the result of the comparison between `x` and `y`. The `gen_rtx_COMPARE` function is used to generate the comparison instruction, and the `gen_rtx_SET` function is used to generate the instruction that sets the value of" GCC,arc,78,"The next statement in this code snippet is: `case GTU: return ;` This is because the `switch` statement is checking the value of `GET_CODE ( comparison )`, and the next value after `LT` is `GTU`." GCC,arc,79,"The next statement after the `switch` statement is the `return` statement with a numerical literal as its argument. The value of the literal depends on the value of the `op` variable, which is determined by the `switch` statement. In the first case, if `op` is `LEU`, the `return` statement will return the value of ``. In the second case, if `op` is `LTU`, the `return` statement will return the value of ``. In the third case, if `op` is" GCC,arc,80,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the code depends on the specific values of the variables and the implementation of the functions being called. However, based on the syntax and the context of the code, it is likely that the next statement will be an assignment to the `op` variable, using the value of `XEXP` as the right-hand side of the assignment. The `` placeholder in the code suggests that the value of `XEXP` is a numeric literal, and the use of the `XEXP" GCC,arc,81,"The next statement of this code snippet is: return ; This is because the code is currently in the `case REG` block, and the next statement after the `return` statement is another `return` statement with a different value." GCC,arc,82,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `case CONST_INT : return ;` This is because the code checks the code of the `op` operand, which is a `CONST_INT`, and then returns a value based on that." GCC,arc,83,"The next statement in the code snippet is: case CONST_DOUBLE: This is because the code is checking the type of the operand (op) and returning a value based on that type. The case for CONST_DOUBLE is the next one after the case for CONST_INT, so it is the next statement that will be executed." GCC,arc,84,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the code depends on the specific values of the variables and the state of the program at the time of execution. However, based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the `else` branch of the `if` statement is executed when the `op` variable is not a register operand. In this case, the `register_operand` function is called with the `op` variable and the `mode` variable as arguments. The `case MEM` branch of the `switch` statement" GCC,arc,85,"The next statement of this code snippet is: return move_double_src_operand ( SUBREG_REG ( op ) , mode ) ; Explanation: The code snippet is checking the type of the operand (op) and determining whether it is a register or a memory location. If the operand is a register, it is passed to the function register_operand to be processed. If the operand is a memory location, it is passed to the function address_operand to be processed. In this case, the operand is a memory location (ME" GCC,arc,86,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet without knowing the specific values of the variables and the context in which the code is being executed. However, based on the information provided, it appears that the code is checking the type of the operand and returning a value based on that type. The first case statement checks if the operand is a label reference, and if so, it returns a value of . The second case statement checks if the operand is a constant, and if so, it returns the value of the constant. The third case statement checks if the operand is" GCC,arc,87,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet without knowing the context in which it is being executed. The code appears to be part of a function that is checking the operands of a machine instruction and returning a value based on the type of operand. The `switch` statement is being used to check the type of the operand, and the `case` labels are used to match the operand type. The `return` statements are used to return a value based on the type of operand. Without knowing the context, it is not possible to predict the next statement of the code" GCC,arc,88,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return nonimmediate_operand ( op , mode ) ;` This is because the `if` statement checks if `op` is a memory operand and if it is volatile. If it is, the function returns ``. If it is not, the function returns the result of calling `nonimmediate_operand` with `op` and `mode` as arguments." GCC,arc,89,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the `nonvol_nonimm_operand` function is dependent on the specific implementation of the function and the input parameters. However, based on the name of the function and the parameters passed to it, it is likely that the function is checking whether the operand `op` is a non-volatile, non-immediate operand in the specified machine mode `mode`. If this is the case, the next statement of the code snippet is likely to be a check on the type of the operand" GCC,arc,90,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet without knowing the values of the variables and the context in which the code is being executed. However, based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the next statement will be an if statement that checks the value of the `optimize` variable. If `optimize` is true, the code will execute the `if` block, which appears to output some assembly code. If `optimize` is false, the code will execute the `else` block, which appears to output some assembly code as well." GCC,arc,91,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return ( code == EQ || code == NE || code == LTU || code == GEU || code == GTU || code == LEU );` This statement is executed if the mode of the expression `XEXP (op, )` is `CCZNCmode`." GCC,arc,92,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `current_insn_set_cc_p = 1;`" GCC,arc,93,"Based on the code snippet you provided, it appears that the next statement will be: `current_insn_set_cc_p = ;` This is because the `switch` statement is checking the value of `get_attr_cond (insn)` and based on that value, it is setting the value of `current_insn_set_cc_p` to either `` or ``. Since the `switch` statement is checking for the values `COND_SET`, `COND_SET_Z" GCC,arc,94,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return ;` This is because the `if` statement checks if the `GET_CODE` of `op` is not equal to `CONST_INT`, and if it is not, it returns ``. Since the `if` statement is not executed, the next statement to be executed is the `return` statement." GCC,arc,95,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the code depends on the specific values of the variables and the implementation of the functions being called. However, based on the syntax and the context of the code, it is likely that the next statement will be an assignment to the `op` variable, using the value of `XEXP` as the right-hand side of the assignment. The `` placeholder in the code suggests that the value of `XEXP` is a numeric literal, and the use of the `XEXP" GCC,arc,96,"The code snippet you provided is a part of a function that takes an `op` parameter, which is expected to be a `PLUS` expression with a `Pmode` mode and two operands that are both register operands. The function checks whether the `op` expression meets these requirements and returns a value based on the result of the check. The next statement of the code snippet you provided is: ``` if ( GET_CODE ( op ) != PLUS || GET_MODE ( op ) != Pmode || ! register_operand ( XEXP ( op , ;` This statement checks if the code of the `op` operand is not a memory reference (i.e., `MEM`). If it is not, the function returns ``." GCC,arc,98,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the code depends on the specific values of the variables and the implementation of the functions being called. However, based on the syntax and the context of the code, it is likely that the next statement will be an assignment to the `op` variable, using the value of `XEXP` as the right-hand side of the assignment. The `` placeholder in the code suggests that the value of `XEXP` is a numeric literal, and the use of the `XEXP" GCC,arc,99,"The next statement of this code snippet is the `return` statement. The code snippet is a `switch` statement that is checking the value of a variable against a set of labels. If the value matches one of the labels, it will return a specific value. If the value does not match any of the labels, it will return a default value. In this case, the code snippet is checking the value of a variable against the labels `LABEL_REF` and `CONST`. If the value matches either of these labels, it will return the value ``. If the value" GCC,arc,100,"Based on the code snippet you provided, it appears that the next statement will be: `case SET: case POST_INC: case POST_DEC: case PRE_INC: case PRE_DEC: break;` This is because the `switch` statement is checking the value of `GET_CODE(x)`, which is the opcode of the `rtx` object `x`. The `switch` statement is checking for the opcodes of various arithmetic instructions, such as `SET`, `POST_INC`, `POST_DEC`, `PRE_INC`," GCC,arc,101,"The next statement in this code snippet is: case CONST_INT: This is because the code is checking the value of the GET_CODE macro, which returns the type of the expression, and it is checking if it is equal to CONST_INT. If it is, then it will execute the code inside the case statement." GCC,arc,102,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `if ( TARGET_ARC600 ) { rtx_insn * succ = next_real_insn ( insn ) ; if ( succ && INSN_P ( succ ) ) len += arc600_corereg_hazard ( insn , succ ) ; }` This statement checks if the target architecture is ARC600, and if so, it calculates the length of the instruction sequence by adding the length of the current instruction and the length of the next real instruction (i.e" GCC,arc,103,"The next statement of this code snippet is: return ( ( LABEL_P ( prev ) || ( TARGET_ARC600 && ( JUMP_P ( prev ) || CALL_P ( prev ) || ( NONJUMP_INSN_P ( prev ) && GET_CODE ( PATTERN ( prev ) ) == SEQUENCE ) ) ) ) ? len + : len ) ;" GCC,arc,104,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `cum->bytes += bytes;`" GCC,arc,105,"The next statement of this code snippet is: ret = ROUND_ADVANCE_CUM ( arg_num , mode , type ) ; This statement is calling the ROUND_ADVANCE_CUM function with the arguments arg_num, mode, and type. The function will return a value that is stored in the ret variable." GCC,arc,106,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be the `ASM_OUTPUT_ALIGN` function call, which is used to output an alignment directive for the label `name`. The `ASM_OUTPUT_ALIGN` function takes two arguments: the first is the stream to output to, and the second is the alignment value. In this case, the alignment value is computed as `floor_log2(align / BITS_PER_UNIT)`, which is the logarithm to the base 2 of the alignment value divided by the number of bits per unit. This is likely to" GCC,arc,107,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `if ( globalize_p ) ( * targetm . asm_out . globalize_label ) ( stream , name ) ;` This statement checks if the `globalize_p` flag is set, and if so, it calls the `globalize_label` function of the `asm_out` target machine to globalize the label. The `globalize_label` function is responsible for making the label visible to the assembler and linker, so that it can be used to reference the label in the assembly code." GCC,arc,108,"The code snippet is checking the type of instruction and its pattern to determine whether it should return a negative value or not. Here's a breakdown of the code: 1. `if (NONJUMP_INSN_P (insn))`: This checks if the instruction is a non-jump instruction. If it is, then the next statement will be executed. 2. `if (GET_CODE (PATTERN (insn)) == USE || GET_CODE (PATTERN (insn)) == CLOBBER)`: This checks if the" GCC,arc,109,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `switch (get_attr_type(u.r)) {` This is because the `if` statement is checking the value of `CROSSING_JUMP_P(followee)`, and if it is true, it will execute the `switch` statement. If it is false, it will return `true`." GCC,arc,110,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `if (loop_depth > ) return false;` This statement checks if the loop depth is greater than a certain value (represented by ``). If it is, the function returns `false`." GCC,arc,111,"The next statement after the `if` statement is the `return` statement. The `if` statement checks if the following conditions are true: * `TARGET_ARC700` is true * `entered_at_top` is false * `wi::gtu_p(iterations, )` is true * `wi::leu_p(iterations, flag_pic ? : )` is true If all of these conditions are true, the `return" GCC,arc,112,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `arc_ccfsm_record_condition(XEXP(src, ), XEXP(src, ) == pc_rtx, insn, state);` This statement is calling the `arc_ccfsm_record_condition` function with the following arguments: * `XEXP(src, )`: This is the first operand of the `src` expression, which is a register. * `XEXP(src," GCC,arc,113,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be the initialization of the `frame_info` structure with the appropriate values. The code snippet is part of the `arc_expand_prologue` function, which is responsible for generating the prologue code for a function. The `frame_info` structure is used to store information about the function's stack frame, including the size of the frame, the location of the return address, and the location of the saved registers. The code snippet initializes the `frame_info` structure with the following values: * `total_" GCC,arc,114,"This code snippet is a part of the GCC compiler and is related to the ARC (Adaptive Resource Control) feature. It appears to be checking the attributes of a function declaration to determine the type of function it is. The code starts by initializing a variable `fn_type` to `ARC_FUNCTION_NORMAL`. It then iterates over the attributes of the function declaration using a `for` loop. For each attribute, it checks if the attribute name is equal to a specific string literal (represented by ``) and if the attribute" GCC,arc,115,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return fun -> machine -> fn_type = fn_type ;` This statement is the last statement in the code snippet, and it returns the value of `fn_type` to the caller. The value of `fn_type` is determined by the previous statements in the code snippet, which check the attributes of the function `decl` and set `fn_type` to `ARC_FUNCTION_ILINK1` or `ARC_FUNCTION_ILINK2` depending on the attributes." GCC,arc,116,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be: `frame->millicode_start_reg = ;` This is because the `for` loop has just finished executing, and the next statement to be executed is the one that assigns the value of `` to `frame->millicode_start_reg`." GCC,arc,117,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `if (TREE_CODE (decl) == NAMESPACE_DECL && DECL_NAMESPACE_ANON_P (decl)) return true;` This statement checks if the `decl` is a namespace declaration and if it is an anonymous namespace. If it is, the function returns `true`." GCC,arc,118,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the code depends on the specific input and the implementation of the `arc_decl_pretend_args` function. However, based on the name of the function, it is likely that the function is used to declare or define a new argument for a function or method. The `tree` data structure is commonly used to represent the abstract syntax tree (AST) of a program, and the `decl` parameter is likely to be a node in the AST representing a function or method declaration. Therefore" GCC,arc,119,"The next statement after the `if (x)` block is `return orig_x;`. The `if (x)` block is only executed if `x` is true, which means that the `return x;` statement inside the block is only executed if `x` is true. If `x` is false, the `return orig_x;` statement is executed instead. Therefore, the next statement after the `if (x)` block is `return orig_x;`, regardless of whether `x` is true or false." GCC,arc,120,"This code snippet appears to be part of a function that is trying to generate a runtime expression for a specific operation. The function is using a library called ""rtl"" (which stands for ""Run-Time Library"") to generate the expression. The code is checking the type of the expression and the registers used in the expression to determine the correct way to generate the runtime expression. It is using a series of ""if"" statements to check the different conditions and generate the appropriate expression. The first ""if"" statement checks if the expression is a ""PLUS"" expression and if the first operand is a register" GCC,arc,121,"Based on the code snippet you provided, the next statement is likely to be: `SYMBOL_REF_FLAGS (symbol) |= flags;` This is because the `SYMBOL_REF_FLAGS` macro is used to set the flags for a symbol, and the `flags` variable is being set to the value of `SYMBOL_FLAG_LONG_CALL`, `SYMBOL_FLAG_MEDIUM_CALL`, or `SYMBOL_FLAG_SHORT_CALL` depending on the value of `long_call_attr`," GCC,arc,122,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return true;`" GCC,arc,123,"Based on the code snippet provided, it appears to be a part of a function that is dealing with the prologue and epilogue of a function. The code is checking if the function has a small integer offset and if it does, it is adding that offset to the stack pointer. If the function does not have a small integer offset, it is checking if the function has a return address and if it does, it is adding that to the stack pointer as well. It is difficult to predict the next statement of the code snippet without knowing the context in which it is being executed. However, based on the code" GCC,arc,124,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `if ( store[i] ) emit_insn ( store[i] ) ;` This statement checks if the `store` array has an element at index `i`, and if so, it emits an instruction using that element. The instruction is not specified in the code snippet, so it could be any instruction that takes a single operand." GCC,arc,125,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `dst_addr = adjust_address (dst, BLKmode, 0);` This statement is adjusting the address of the destination operand to be a multiple of the alignment specified in the `align` variable. The `adjust_address` function is a GCC-specific function that adjusts the address of an operand to be a multiple of the specified alignment. In this case, the alignment is specified by the `align` variable, which is set to the value of the `align` operand. The `adjust_address" GCC,arc,126,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be: `frame_pointer_rtx = gen_rtx_REG ( Pmode, FRAME_POINTER_REGNUM );` This is because the code is setting up the frame pointer for the current function, and the `frame_pointer_rtx` variable is used to store the frame pointer register. The `gen_rtx_REG` function is used to generate a register operand with the specified mode and register number. In this case, the mode is `Pmode` (which is the mode of the stack" GCC,arc,127,"The next statement of this code snippet is: pat = gen_rtx_CONST ( Pmode , pat ) ; This statement takes the value of pat, which is a symbolic reference to a memory location, and wraps it in a CONST expression, which indicates that the value of pat is a constant and cannot be changed. The resulting expression is then stored in the pat variable." GCC,arc,128,"Based on the code snippet you provided, it appears to be a part of a function that is generating assembly code for a processor with an ARC (Argonaut) architecture. The code is checking for certain conditions and inserting a NOP instruction if necessary. Here's a breakdown of the code: 1. `if (PREV_INSN(insn) && PREV_INSN(NEXT_INSN(insn)) == insn && arc_hazard(prev_real_insn(insn), insn)) {`: This line checks if there is" GCC,arc,129,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be: `cfun->machine->size_reason = ;` This is because the previous statement `arc_ccfsm_advance(insn, &arc_ccfsm_current)` is a function call that is likely to have a side effect on the `cfun->machine->size_reason` variable. The `arc_ccfsm_advance` function is not shown in the code snippet, but it is likely to be a function that advances the state of the ARC CCFSM" GCC,arc,130,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the function `arc_frame_pointer_required` is dependent on the specific implementation of the function and the input parameters. However, based on the name of the function and the fact that it is declared as a `static` function, it is likely that the function is used to determine whether a frame pointer is required for a particular architecture or platform. The function may use a combination of preprocessor directives and architecture-specific code to determine whether a frame pointer is required, and may return a boolean value indicating the" GCC,arc,131,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the code depends on the values of the variables and the specific implementation of the functions being called. However, we can make some educated guesses based on the information provided. The code snippet appears to be part of a function that is handling the arguments of a function call. The variable `arg_num` is being used to keep track of the current argument number, and the variable `mode` is being used to store the mode of the current argument. The variable `type` is also being used, but its purpose" GCC,arc,132,"The next statement of this code snippet is: ret = gen_rtx_REG ( mode , arg_num ) ; debstr = reg_names [ arg_num ] ; This is because the `else if` block is executed when the condition `GPR_REST_ARG_REGS ( arg_num ) > ` is true, which means that the `arg_num` is greater than the number of general-purpose registers available for argument passing. In this case, the function `gen_rtx_REG` is called to generate a register" GCC,arc,133,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `for (i = 0; i < words; i++) *cum = ARC_NEXT_ARG_REG(*cum);` This is because the `if` statement is only executed if `words` is non-zero, and the `for` loop is only executed if `words` is greater than 0. The `for` loop initializes `i` to 0 and increments it by 1 until it reaches `words`, which is the number of words in the input string. The loop body is executed for" GCC,arc,134,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `cum->nargs_prototype = words;`" GCC,arc,135,"The next statement after the `if` block will be the `return true` statement. The `if` block will be executed if the condition `ARC_INTERRUPT_P ( arc_compute_function_type ( cfun ) )` is true. If the condition is true, the `return false` statement will be executed, and the function will return `false`. If the condition is false, the `return true` statement will be executed, and the function will return `true`." GCC,arc,136,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return true;` Explanation: The `arc_function_ok_for_sibcall` function takes two arguments, `decl` and `exp`, which are not used in the function body. The function first calls the `arc_compute_function_type` function with the `cfun` argument, which returns a value that is then passed to the `ARC_INTERRUPT_P` macro. If the result of the macro is true, the function returns false. Otherwise, the function returns true." GCC,arc,137,"It's difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet without knowing the context and the purpose of the code. However, based on the syntax and the fact that the code is using the `->` operator, it appears to be dealing with pointers or references to functions or objects. Without more information, it's impossible to say for certain what the next statement of this code snippet will be. It could be anything from a function call to a variable assignment, depending on the context and the purpose of the code." GCC,arc,138,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `warning ( OPT_Wattributes , , name ) ;` This statement is executed if the `strcmp` function returns a non-zero value, indicating that the string pointed to by `TREE_STRING_POINTER ( value )` is not equal to either of the two string literals passed as arguments to `strcmp`. In this case, a warning message is printed to the console using the `warning` function, with the message specified by the string literal ``. The `name" GCC,arc,139,"The next statement of this code snippet is: * no_add_attrs = true;" GCC,arc,140,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return arc600_corereg_hazard ( pred , succ ) ;` This is because the previous `if` statements have already been evaluated and the conditions are not met, so the execution will continue to the next statement. The `arc600_corereg_hazard` function will be called with the `pred` and `succ` arguments, and its return value will be returned as the final result of the function." GCC,arc,141,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `merge_bb = ;` This statement assigns the value `` to the variable `merge_bb`." GCC,arc,142,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `arc_init_reg_tables ( ) ;` This statement initializes the register tables for the ARC architecture." GCC,arc,143,"Based on the code snippet provided, it appears to be a function that initializes a trampoline for a function. The function takes three arguments: `tramp`, `fndecl`, and `cxt`. The function first retrieves the address of the function being called from the `DECL_RTL` of `fndecl`. It then stores the address of the function in the trampoline at offset ``. Next, the function stores the value of `cxt` in the trampoline at offset ``." GCC,arc,144,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return ( cfun -> machine -> frame_info . total_size - ( cfun -> machine -> frame_info . pretend_size + cfun -> machine -> frame_info . extra_size + cfun -> machine -> frame_info . reg_size ) ) ;` This statement is executed if the `from` register is the frame pointer register (FRAME_POINTER_REGNUM) and the `to` register is the stack pointer register (STACK_POINTER_REGNUM). It calculates the offset" GCC,arc,145,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the code and the values of the variables involved. However, based on the context of the code snippet, it is likely that the next statement will be a conditional statement that checks if the `from` and `to` registers are equal to certain values. In this code snippet, `from` and `to` are registers that are being compared to the values of `FRAME_POINTER_REGNUM` and `STACK_POINTER_REGNUM`, respectively. If the" GCC,arc,146,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it appears to be part of a larger program and the context is not provided. However, based on the syntax and the functions being defined, it appears that the next statement could be a call to one of the built-in functions defined in the snippet, such as `TARGET_MUL64_SET`, `TARGET_MUL64_SET`, `ARC_BUILTIN_RTIE`, `ARC_BUILTIN_SYNC`, `ARC_BUILTIN_" GCC,arc,147,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the program depends on the specific values of the variables and the implementation of the `machine` structure. However, based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the program is initializing the `machine` structure with default values. The first statement sets the `fn_type` field of the `machine` structure to `ARC_FUNCTION_UNKNOWN`, which indicates that the function type is unknown. The second statement sets the `force_short_suffix` field of the `machine" GCC,arc,148,"The next statement of this code snippet is: machine->force_short_suffix = -1;" GCC,arc,149,"Based on the code snippet you provided, it appears that the next statement will be: arc_mode_class[i] = << (int) TF_MODE; This is because the code is checking the size of the mode (GET_MODE_SIZE(m)) and setting the arc_mode_class accordingly. The previous cases checked for modes with sizes <= 4, == 4, == 8, and == 16, so the next case is likely to check for modes with size == 128. The constant ) arc_mode_class[i] = << (int)S_MODE;` This line checks if the size of the current machine mode is less than or equal to a certain value (represented by ``), and if" GCC,arc,151,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `ilp->insn_length_parameters = arc_insn_length_parameters;` This statement is assigning the `arc_insn_length_parameters` function to the `insn_length_parameters` field of the `ilp` structure." GCC,arc,152,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `if ( TREE_CODE ( decl ) != VAR_DECL ) return false ;` This statement checks if the `decl` is not a variable declaration, and if it is not, it returns `false`." GCC,arc,153,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return loop_align;` The code snippet is checking if the previous instruction is a `doloop_begin_i` instruction, and if so, it returns the `loop_align` value. If the previous instruction is not a `doloop_begin_i` instruction, it checks if the next instruction is an `INSN_P` and if its `recog_memoized` value is greater than or equal to ``. If both conditions are true, it returns ``." GCC,arc,154,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return align_labels_log;` The code snippet is checking if the current instruction is a loop beginning instruction, and if so, it returns the alignment of the loop label. If the current instruction is not a loop beginning instruction, it checks if the next instruction is a non-debug instruction and if its recognition code is greater than or equal to a certain value. If both conditions are true, it returns the recognition code. Otherwise, it returns the alignment of the loop label." GCC,arc,155,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet without knowing the context in which it is being executed. However, based on the code snippet provided, it appears to be checking the validity of an address for a memory operation. The code snippet is checking if the address is a valid address for a base register, a valid offset address, a valid scaled address, a valid small data address, or a valid constant integer address. If none of these conditions are met, it then checks if the address is a valid symbolic address, a valid label address, or a valid constant address. If the" GCC,arc,156,"The next statement in the code snippet is: `if (arc_raw_symbolic_reference_mentioned_p(x, false)) return false;` This statement checks if the symbolic reference `x` is mentioned in the current instruction, and if it is not, it returns `false`." GCC,arc,157,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the context in which the code is being executed. However, based on the syntax and the fact that the code is inside a function, it is likely that the next statement will be the start of a new block of code, such as an `if` statement or a `while` loop." GCC,arc,158,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be a comparison of the value returned by the `GET_CODE` function with the constant `UNSPEC`. If the value returned by `GET_CODE` is equal to `UNSPEC`, then the next statement is likely to be a comparison of the value returned by the `XVECEXP` function with the constant `ARC_UNSPEC_GOT`. If the value returned by `XVECEXP` is equal to `ARC_UNSPEC_GOT`, then the next statement is likely to be" GCC,arc,159,"The next statement after the given code snippet is likely to be the return value of the function `arc_raw_symbolic_reference_mentioned_p`. The function `arc_raw_symbolic_reference_mentioned_p` is a predicate that checks whether a given symbolic reference is mentioned in the current arc. The function takes two arguments: the first is the symbolic reference to be checked, and the second is a boolean value indicating whether the reference should be checked as a raw reference (i.e., without considering any potential aliasing). In the given code snippet, the function" GCC,arc,160,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `inner = plus_constant ( Pmode , XEXP ( addr , ) , upper ) ;` This statement is adding a constant value to the `XEXP` field of `addr`, which is a `CONST` expression. The constant value is `upper`, which is calculated as `(offs + * size) & ~ * size`. The `plus_constant` function is used to perform the addition. The result of this expression is stored in the `" GCC,arc,161,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `if ( GET_CODE ( addr ) == CONST ) { addr = XEXP ( addr , ) ;` This statement is checking if the `addr` expression is a `CONST` expression, and if so, it is extracting the `XEXP` (expression) part of the `addr` expression. The `` placeholder is likely a literal value that is used to specify the operand number of the `XEXP` expression to be extracted." GCC,arc,162,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet without knowing the specific values of the variables and the context in which the code is being executed. However, based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the next statement will be an `if` statement that checks the value of `GET_CODE ( addr )`. If `GET_CODE ( addr )` is equal to `CONST`, then the code will execute the block of code within the `if` statement. If `GET_CODE ( addr )` is not equal to `CONST`, then the code will execute the block of code within the `" GCC,arc,163,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be: `if ( GET_MODE_SIZE ( mode ) + offset - offset_base <= ( << shift ) ) {` This is because the previous `if` statement has been evaluated and found to be true, so the code will proceed to the next `if` statement. The condition of this `if` statement is checking if the size of the mode plus the offset minus the offset base is less than or equal to a certain value, which is likely to be a constant or a register value. If this condition is" GCC,arc,164,"The next statement of this code snippet is: * p = gen_rtx_PLUS ( Pmode , sum , GEN_INT ( offset - offset_base ) ) ; This statement is assigning a new value to the pointer p, which is a pointer to an rtx expression. The new value is a PLUS expression with the operands sum and GEN_INT ( offset - offset_base )." GCC,arc,165,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return ! TARGET_NO_LRA;` This statement returns the negation of the value of the `TARGET_NO_LRA` macro, which is a boolean value. The `!` operator is used to negate the value of the macro." GCC,arc,166,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the `arc_lra_p` function is not specified. However, based on the name of the function and the fact that it is declared as a `static` function, it is likely that the function is used to perform some kind of arc-based layout routing optimization. Without more information about the specific implementation of the `arc_lra_p` function, it is not possible to provide a more specific prediction of the next statement." GCC,arc,167,"The code snippet you provided is a C function that takes an address `addr` as an argument and returns a boolean value indicating whether the address is a valid address for a memory access. The function first checks if the address is a `PLUS` expression, which is a type of address that represents a sum of two or more addresses. If the address is not a `PLUS` expression, the function returns `false`. If the address is a `PLUS` expression, the function then checks if the second operand of the `PLUS` expression is a `MULT` expression or a constant" GCC,arc,168,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `if ( ! LABEL_P ( insn ) ) {` This is because the `while` loop will continue to execute until the condition `NOTE_P ( insn ) || ( cfun -> machine -> arc_reorg_started && LABEL_P ( insn ) && ! label_to_alignment ( insn ) ) || ( NONJUMP_INSN_P ( insn ) && ( GET_CODE ( PATTERN ( insn ) ) == USE || GET_" GCC,arc,169,"The next statement of the code snippet is: `if ( ! LABEL_P ( insn ) )` This is because the `do-while` loop will continue to execute as long as the condition `NOTE_P ( insn ) || ( cfun -> machine -> arc_reorg_started && LABEL_P ( insn ) && ! label_to_alignment ( insn ) ) || ( NONJUMP_INSN_P ( insn ) && ( GET_CODE ( PATTERN ( insn ) ) == USE" GCC,arc,170,"The next statement in the code snippet is: int neg_intval = -intval; This is because the variable `intval` is assigned the value of the expression `( REG_P ( operands [ ] ) ? : CONST_INT_P ( operands [ ] ) ? INTVAL ( operands [ ] ) : )` in the previous line, and then the variable `neg_intval` is assigned the negative of" GCC,arc,171,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `sprintf(buf, , fname);` This is because the `if` statement is checking the condition `TARGET_LONG_CALLS_SET || (TARGET_MEDIUM_CALLS && arc_ccfsm_cond_exec_p())`, and if that condition is true, it will execute the statement `sprintf(buf, , fname);`." GCC,arc,172,"The next statement after the `if` block is the `else` block. So, the next statement will be: `sprintf(buf, , fname);`" GCC,arc,173,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet without knowing the specific values of the variables and constants used in the code. However, based on the structure of the code, it appears to be a loop that is repeatedly shifting the value of `mi_delta` by `shift` bits to the left, and then checking if the result is equal to a specific value. If the result is not equal, the loop continues to shift and check until the result is equal. The loop also checks if `vcall_offset` is not equal to a specific value, and if so, it performs a series" GCC,arc,174,"Based on the code snippet provided, it is difficult to predict the next statement with certainty. However, based on the context and the structure of the code, it appears that the next statement will be a case statement that handles the PLUS operator. The code is part of the output_addr_const function, which is responsible for generating assembly code for a constant address. The function takes a file, an expression x, and a code as inputs, and it outputs assembly code to the file that represents the constant address. The code snippet provided is part of a switch statement that handles different types of expressions. The" GCC,arc,175,"Based on the code snippet provided, it appears to be part of a function that generates assembly code for the ARC processor. The function appears to be handling various types of constants and expressions, and outputting them to a file. The next statement in the code snippet is: case ZERO_EXTEND : case SIGN_EXTEND : arc_output_pic_addr_const ( file , XEXP ( x , ) , code ) ; This statement is handling the case where the expression is a ZERO_EXTEND or SIGN_EXT" GCC,arc,176,"Based on the code snippet you provided, it appears that the next statement after the `if` statements would be a call to the `arc_init` function. Here's a breakdown of the code: 1. `if ( flag_pic ) target_flags |= MASK_NO_SDATA_SET ;`: This line checks if the `flag_pic` variable is set, and if so, sets the `target_flags` variable to include the `MASK_NO_SDATA_SET` flag. 2. `if ( flag_no_common ==" GCC,arc,177,"It's difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet without knowing the specific values of the variables and the context in which the code is being executed. However, based on the code snippet you provided, it appears that the next statement will be the `if` statement, as the code is currently checking the condition `final_sequence && ! INSN_ANNULLED_BRANCH_P ( insn ) && ( get_attr_cond ( insn ) != COND_USE || ! reg_set_p ( gen_rtx_REG ( CCmode , CC_REG ) , XV" GCC,arc,178,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `if (cl == NO_REGS) return NO_REGS;` This statement checks if the `cl` argument is equal to `NO_REGS`, which is a special value that indicates that there are no registers available for the reload. If this is the case, the function returns `NO_REGS` immediately, without performing any further processing." GCC,arc,179,"Based on the code snippet you provided, it appears to be a part of a function that prints an address in a specific format. The function takes two arguments, `file` and `base`, and it appears to be using the `fputc` function to write characters to the file. The code snippet you provided is not complete, so it's difficult to say exactly what the next statement will be. However, based on the code you provided, it seems likely that the next statement will be a call to the `arc_print_operand_address` function, which is defined elsewhere in the code." GCC,arc,180,"The code snippet you provided is a part of the GCC compiler's code generation for the ARM architecture. It is generating code for a load/store operation, specifically for the case where the destination is a doubleword (64-bit) register. The code is using the `simplify_gen_subreg` function to generate a simplified version of the destination register, which is then used to generate the load/store instructions. The `emit_insn` function is used to emit the generated instructions. The code is checking the state of the destination register, and based on that," GCC,arc,181,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `fmt = GET_RTX_FORMAT ( GET_CODE ( op ) ) ;` This line retrieves the format of the RTX code of the `op` operand, which is a `SYMBOL_REF` in this case. The format is used to determine the number of operands that the RTX code has, and to check if any of those operands are symbolic references that need to be processed." GCC,arc,182,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `fmt = GET_RTX_FORMAT (GET_CODE (op));` This line retrieves the format of the RTX (Register Transfer eXtension) instruction that is being processed. The format is a string that describes the layout of the instruction, including the types of its operands. The `GET_RTX_FORMAT` function is used to retrieve the format string for the instruction." GCC,arc,183,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return ;` This is because the `else if` statement that checks if `to_class` is equal to `LPCOUNT_REG` or `WRITABLE_CORE_REGS` is not true, so the code will execute the `else` statement, which returns ``." GCC,arc,184,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return ( size == - || size > ) ;` This statement is a return statement that returns a boolean value indicating whether the size of the type is equal to - or greater than ." GCC,arc,185,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the code depends on the specific inputs and the implementation of the `arc_frame_info` structure. However, based on the code snippet you provided, it appears that the code is accessing the `frame_info` field of the `machine` field of the `cfun` structure. The `frame_info` field is likely a pointer to a `arc_frame_info` structure, which contains information about the current function's frame. The next statement of the code snippet is likely to" GCC,arc,186,"The next statement of this code snippet is: return ( afi -> save_return_addr ? afi -> total_size - afi -> pretend_size - afi -> extra_size : - ) ; This statement is returning the offset of the return slot in the stack frame. If the return address is saved, the offset is calculated as the total size of the frame minus the pretend size minus the extra size. If the return address is not saved, the offset is - , which is a negative number." GCC,arc,187,"The code snippet is checking if the operand `op` is a memory reference and if it is, it checks if the address of the memory reference is the same as the location `loc`. If the address is the same, it does nothing. If the address is not the same, it checks if the address is a sum of a register and a constant, and if it is, it forces the value at `loc` to be stored in a register. Therefore, the next statement of this code snippet would be: * If the address of the memory reference `op` is the same as `loc" GCC,arc,188,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific values of the variables and the behavior of the functions being called. However, based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the next statement will be: `return ( GET_CODE ( x ) == SYMBOL_REF && SYMBOL_REF_SMALL_P ( x ) ) ;` This is because the code snippet is checking the value of `x` and returning `true` if it is a `SYMBOL_REF` and `SYMBOL_REF" GCC,arc,189,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be the execution of the block of code that is associated with the `PLUS` case of the `switch` statement. This block of code is not shown in the snippet, but it is likely to be the code that is executed when the value of `GET_CODE(x)` is equal to `PLUS`." GCC,arc,190,"Based on the code snippet you provided, it appears to be a part of a function that estimates the cost of a given expression in terms of the number of instructions it takes to execute. The function takes three arguments: the expression to be evaluated, the operation being performed (e.g. PLUS, MINUS, etc.), and a boolean indicating whether or not to optimize for speed. The function first checks the operation being performed and sets the total cost accordingly. For example, if the operation is PLUS, it sets the total cost to the cost of the first operand plus the cost of the second operand" GCC,arc,191,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `rtx reg = gen_rtx_REG ( SImode , regno ) ;` This statement declares a new register variable `reg` of type `SImode` and initializes it with the value of `regno`. The `gen_rtx_REG` function is used to generate a new register variable, and the `SImode` parameter specifies that the register should be of type `SImode`. The `regno` variable is used to determine the register number of the new register." GCC,arc,192,"The next statement is: `rtx reg = gen_rtx_REG (SImode, regno);`" GCC,arc,193,"The code snippet you provided is a part of the GCC compiler's code generation for the ARM architecture. It appears to be related to the generation of conditional codes for certain operations. Based on the code snippet, it is difficult to predict the next statement with certainty, as it depends on the specific values of the variables and the target architecture. However, we can make some observations about the code snippet: 1. The code snippet appears to be checking the validity of certain conditions for a given operation, based on the mode of the operands and the operation being performed. 2. The code" GCC,arc,194,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `int first_reg_offset = first_anon_arg;`" GCC,arc,195,"The next statement of this code snippet is: * pretend_size = ( ( MAX_ARC_PARM_REGS - first_reg_offset ) * UNITS_PER_WORD ) ; This statement assigns the value of the expression ( ( MAX_ARC_PARM_REGS - first_reg_offset ) * UNITS_PER_WORD ) to the variable pretend_size." GCC,arc,196,"The next statement after the `gcc_unreachable()` call is not defined in the code snippet you provided. The `gcc_unreachable()` function is a built-in function in GCC that is used to indicate that a particular code path is unreachable. It is typically used in situations where the compiler can prove that a certain branch of code is never executed, and it is used to avoid generating unnecessary code. In this case, the `gcc_unreachable()` function is being called with no arguments, which means that it is indicating that the code path following the call is" GCC,arc,197,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `start_sequence ( ) ;` This statement starts a new sequence of instructions, which will be used to generate the final output of the function." GCC,arc,198,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `gcc_assert ( ! reg_overlap_mentioned_p ( operands [ ] , addr ) ) ;` This statement checks if the `addr` register overlaps with any of the registers mentioned in the `operands` array, and asserts that it does not. If the assertion fails, the program will terminate with an error message." GCC,arc,199,"The next statement of this code snippet is: return plus_constant ( Pmode , addr , ) ; This statement is a function call to the `plus_constant` function, which takes three arguments: * `Pmode`: The mode of the operation (e.g., `QI`, `HI`, `SI`, etc.) * `addr`: The address of the memory location to be modified * ``: A literal value representing the constant to be added to the memory location The function call returns the result of the addition" GCC,arc,200,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `rtx arc_trampoline_adjust_address ( rtx addr ) {` This is the beginning of a function definition, which is denoted by the `rtx` keyword followed by the function name `arc_trampoline_adjust_address`. The function takes a single argument `addr`, which is a `rtx` object. The function body is not shown in this code snippet, but it would contain the instructions that are executed when the function is called." GCC,arc,201,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return priority + ;` Explanation: The code snippet is a function named `arc_sched_adjust_priority` that takes two parameters: `insn`, which is a pointer to an `rtx_insn` structure, and `priority`, which is an integer. The function checks if the `insn` is a `SET` instruction and if the source operand of the `SET` instruction is a register in `DFmode`. If both conditions are true, the function returns" GCC,arc,202,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `machine = get_attr_machine ( insn ) ;` This is because the `if` statement checks if the value of `check_attr` is greater than a certain value (represented by ``), and if it is, it sets the value of `iscompact` to the result of calling the `get_attr_iscompact` function with `insn` as an argument. If the `if` statement is not executed, the next statement to be executed is the one after the `if`" GCC,arc,203,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `rtx dest = SET_DEST ( pat ) ;`" GCC,arc,204,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be: `dest_uid = GET_CODE ( dest );` This is because the `if` statement is checking the value of `GET_CODE ( dest )` and if it is equal to `IF_THEN_ELSE`, it will execute the code inside the `if` block. The `dest_uid` variable is not initialized in the code snippet provided, so it is likely that the next statement will be an assignment to `dest_uid`." GCC,arc,205,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific values of the `operands` array and the `opno` parameter. However, based on the code provided, it appears that the `check_if_valid_regno_const` function is checking whether the operand at index `opno` in the `operands` array is a valid register number constant. If the operand is a register number constant, the function will return `true`. If the operand is not a register number constant, the function will return `false`." GCC,arc,206,"The next statement in the code snippet is: `case SYMBOL_REF :`" GCC,arc,207,The next statement after the `default` label is the end of the `switch` statement. GCC,arc,208,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be: `addr = XEXP (op, 0);` This is because the code is checking the operand `op` to see if it is a memory operand (using the `GET_CODE` macro), and if it is, it is extracting the address of the memory operand using the `XEXP` macro." GCC,arc,209,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return LEGITIMATE_SMALL_DATA_ADDRESS_P ( addr ) ;` This statement is executed if the size of the operand is greater than the size of a word (i.e., `size > UNITS_PER_WORD`). The function `LEGITIMATE_SMALL_DATA_ADDRESS_P` checks if the address of the operand is a valid small data address. If it is not, the function returns `false`." GCC,arc,210,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be: `if ( RTX_FRAME_RELATED_P ( insn ) ) {` This is because the code snippet is checking if the instruction is related to a frame, and if so, it will execute the code inside the `if` statement. The `RTX_FRAME_RELATED_P` macro is used to check if an instruction is related to a frame, and it is likely to be true for the instruction being processed in this code snippet." GCC,arc,211,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `rtx temp = reload_in_progress ? operands[] : gen_reg_rtx(Pmode);` This statement declares a variable `temp` of type `rtx` and initializes it with the result of a ternary operator. The ternary operator checks the value of `reload_in_progress` and returns either `operands[]` or `gen_reg_rtx(Pmode)`. The value of `temp` will depend on the value" GCC,arc,212,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `if (GET_CODE(operands[]) == MEM && SYMBOLIC_CONST(operands[])) operands[] = force_reg(Pmode, operands[]);` This statement checks if the operand at index `` is a memory reference and if it is a symbolic constant. If both conditions are true, it forces the operand to be a register in the specified" GCC,arc,213,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `block[offset] = value;`" GCC,arc,214,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `if ( reuse ) emit_insn ( gen_add2_insn ( addr , offs ) ) ;` This is because the `if` statement that is currently being executed is checking whether the `reuse` variable is true or false. If it is true, then the `emit_insn` function will be called with the `gen_add2_insn` instruction and the `addr` and `offs` parameters. If it is false, then the `addr` variable will be assigned the result of the `copy_" GCC,arc,215,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `iter->op = op;`" GCC,arc,216,"The next statement is: `rtx op1 = gen_rtx_REG ( cmode, GET_MODE_SIZE ( cmode ) / UNITS_PER_WORD ) ;`" GCC,arc,217,"The next statement of this code snippet is: return gen_rtx_REG ( SImode , TARGET_BIG_ENDIAN ? : ) ; This statement returns a register operand with the specified mode (SImode) and the appropriate endianness (big or little) based on the value of the TARGET_BIG_ENDIAN macro. The placeholders are replaced with the appropriate register numbers." GCC,arc,218,"The next statement of this code snippet is: case CC_FPXmode : switch ( GET_CODE ( comparison ) ) { case EQ : return ARC_CC_EQ ; case NE : return ARC_CC_NE ; case UNORDERED : return ARC_CC_C ; case ORDERED : return ARC_CC_NC ; case LTGT : return ARC_CC_HI ; case UNEQ : return ARC_CC_LS ; default : gcc_unreachable ( ) ; }" GCC,arc,219,"Based on the code snippet you provided, it appears to be a part of a function that is checking if an instruction is unaligned and if so, it is printing a message to the console and updating the unalign field of the cfun machine structure. The next statement of this code snippet would likely be the execution of the fprintf function, which would print the message to the console." GCC,arc,220,"The next statement in the code snippet is: `pass_data_arc_ifcvt ( ctxt ) ;` This statement is calling the `pass_data_arc_ifcvt` function, which is a member function of the `rtl_opt_pass` class. The `pass_data_arc_ifcvt` function is not defined in the code snippet, so it is not possible to determine what it does. However, based on the name of the function, it is likely that it is related to the optimization of the RTL code for the ARC instruction set" GCC,arc,221,"The next statement in the code snippet is: `pass_data_arc_ifcvt ( ctxt ) ;` This statement is calling the `pass_data_arc_ifcvt` function, which is a member function of the `rtl_opt_pass` class. The `pass_data_arc_ifcvt` function is not defined in the code snippet, so it is not possible to determine what it does. However, based on the name of the function, it is likely that it is related to the optimization of the RTL code for the ARC instruction set" GCC,arc,222,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `if ( MEM_P ( operands [ ] ) && ! cse_not_expected ) {` This statement checks if the operand at index `` is a memory operand and if the CSE (Common Subexpression Elimination) optimization is not expected. If both conditions are true, the code inside the `if` block will be executed." GCC,arc,223,"The next statement of this code snippet is: MEM_COPY_ATTRIBUTES ( pat , operands [ ] ) ; This is because the code snippet is checking if the address of the memory operand is valid, and if it is not, it is trying to legitimize the address by changing it to a valid form. The MEM_COPY_ATTRIBUTES macro is used to copy the attributes of the original memory operand to the new memory operand that is being created." GCC,arc,224,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `else if (arc_rewrite_small_data_p(x)) return true;` This is because the `if` statement checks if the expression `GET_CODE(x) == PLUS && rtx_equal_p(XEXP(x, ), pic_offset_table_rtx)` is true, and if it is, it skips the subexpressions of `x` using the `skip_subrtxes()` function. If the expression is not true, it checks if `arc_" GCC,arc,225,"The code snippet is a loop that iterates over the elements of an array, and for each element, it checks if the element is a PLUS expression and if the second operand of the PLUS expression is equal to the pic_offset_table_rtx. If the condition is true, the loop skips the current element and moves on to the next one. If the condition is false, the loop checks if the element is a small data reference, and if it is, the loop returns true. If the loop reaches the end of the array without finding any small data references, it returns false. There" GCC,arc,226,"This code snippet is using the `rtx` library to compare two `rtx` objects for equality. The `rtx` library is a part of the GCC compiler and provides a way to represent and manipulate expressions in a compiler. The code is using the `XVECEXP` macro to extract a subexpression from the `u0` and `u1` objects, which are assumed to be `rtx` objects. The `XSTR` macro is then used to convert the subexpression to a string. The `strcmp` function is used to compare the two strings for equality." GCC,arc,227,"The code snippet is checking if two expressions are equal. The first expression is a string literal, and the second expression is a reference to a register. The `strcmp` function is used to compare the string literals, and the `rtx_equal_p` function is used to compare the registers. The `!` operator is used to negate the result of the `strcmp` function, so the overall result of the expression is true if the string literals are not equal, and the registers are equal. Therefore, the next statement of this code snippet would be to evaluate the `" GCC,arc,228,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `if ( GET_CODE ( x ) == COND_EXEC ) x = COND_EXEC_CODE ( x ) ;` This statement checks if the current instruction is a conditional execution instruction, and if so, it sets `x` to the code of the instruction that should be executed conditionally. The `COND_EXEC` and `COND_EXEC_CODE` macros are defined in the `rtl.h` header file and are used to manipulate the conditional execution information of an instruction." GCC,arc,229,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be: `rtx src = SET_SRC ( x ) ;` This is because the code is checking the destination of a SET or CLOBBER instruction, and then retrieving the source of the instruction. The next step is likely to be to retrieve the source operand of the instruction, which is stored in the SET_SRC field." GCC,arc,230,"The next statement is: `count = gen_rtx_SYMBOL_REF ( Pmode , xstrdup ( buf ) ) ;` This statement is assigning a new value to the `count` variable, which is a pointer to a `rtx` structure. The `gen_rtx_SYMBOL_REF` function is being called to create a new `rtx` structure with the `Pmode` parameter set to the current mode, and the `xstrdup` function is being used to create a copy of the `buf` string. The resulting `rtx" GCC,arc,231,"This code snippet is part of the GCC compiler's code generation for x86 targets. It appears to be generating assembly code for a specific instruction. The code is using a hash table (`htab`) to store and retrieve information about instructions. The `src` variable appears to be an instruction being processed, and `slot` is a pointer to a slot in the hash table where information about the instruction is stored. The code first checks if the slot is empty, and if so, it initializes the slot with the instruction and generates a unique label for the instruction. It then outputs the assembly" GCC,arc,232,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `tree value = TREE_VALUE ( args ) ;`" GCC,arc,233,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `for (a = DECL_ATTRIBUTES (decl); a; a = TREE_CHAIN (a)) {` This line is the start of a `for` loop that iterates over the attributes of the `decl` variable, which is a `tree` structure representing a function declaration. The loop variable `a` is set to the first attribute in the list, and the loop continues until `a` is null. Within the loop, the code checks the name and value of each attribute, and" GCC,arc,234,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be a call to the `gen_rtx_REG` function, which is used to generate a new register expression. The function takes three arguments: the mode of the register, the register number, and the value of the register. In this code snippet, the mode is `SImode`, which is a 32-bit signed integer mode. The register number is specified by the `` placeholder, which is likely to be a literal value or a variable that contains a register number. The value of the register is not specified in this" GCC,arc,235,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `error ( ) ;` This is because the code checks if `alignTest` is less than or equal to a certain value (represented by ) or if it is not a power of 2 (i.e., if `alignTest & -alignTest` is not equal to `alignTest`). If either of these conditions is true, the code will execute the `error` function and return `NULL_RTX`." GCC,arc,236,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `frame_stack_add ( ra_offs ) ;`" GCC,arc,237,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `size_to_deallocate -= ra_offs - first_offset;` This statement subtracts the difference between `ra_offs` and `first_offset` from `size_to_deallocate`. The purpose of this statement is to adjust the amount of space to deallocate on the stack, based on the offset of the return address register and the first offset." GCC,arc,238,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet without knowing the context and the purpose of the code. However, based on the code snippet provided, it appears to be a part of a function that is generating instructions for a computer program. The code is using a loop to iterate over a set of values, and for each value, it is generating a move instruction to move data from a source address to a destination address. The source and destination addresses are being offset by a certain amount, and the loop is continuing until the source address is greater than the destination address. Without knowing the specifics" GCC,arc,239,"The next statement is likely to be: `pat = gen_rtx_CONST ( Pmode , pat ) ;` This is because the previous statement is `pat = gen_rtx_UNSPEC ( Pmode , gen_rtvec ( , pat ) , ARC_UNSPEC_GOT ) ;`, which sets `pat` to a constant value. The next statement is likely to be a constant assignment, which is consistent with the pattern of the code snippet." GCC,arc,240,"The next statement after the `if` block is: `* no_add_attrs = true;` This statement sets the `no_add_attrs` variable to `true` if the `TREE_CODE` of `value` is not a `STRING_CST`." GCC,arc,241,"The next statement in this code snippet is: `* no_add_attrs = true ;` This statement is executed if the `strcmp` function returns a non-zero value, indicating that the string pointed to by `value` is not equal to either of the two string literals. In this case, the `warning` function is called with the `OPT_Wattributes` option and the `name` parameter, and the `no_add_attrs` variable is set to `true`." GCC,arc,242,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `if ( ! pred || ! INSN_P ( pred ) || ! succ || ! INSN_P ( succ ) ) return ;` This statement checks if the `pred` and `succ` arguments are not null and are of type `INSN_P`. If either of these conditions is not met, the function returns a value of ``." GCC,arc,243,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `case :` This is a case label, indicating that the code following this statement will be executed if the value of the expression `statep->state` is equal to ``." GCC,arc,244,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `merge_bb = ;` This statement assigns the value `` to the variable `merge_bb`." GCC,arc,245,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `if ( TARGET_ATOMIC && ! ( TARGET_ARC700 || TARGET_HS ) ) error ( ) ;` This statement checks if the `TARGET_ATOMIC` flag is set and if the `TARGET_ARC700` or `TARGET_HS` flags are not set. If this condition is true, the `error` function is called with a string literal as an argument." GCC,arc,246,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific values of the variables and the behavior of the functions being called. However, based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the next statement will be: arc_mode_class[i] = << (int) C_MODE; This is because the code is currently in the ""default"" case of the switch statement, and the next statement is the one that will be executed if the current mode is not one of the modes handled by the previous cases. The value" GCC,arc,247,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `if ( ! succ_bb ) {`" GCC,arc,248,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `if ( flag_pic ) target_flags |= MASK_NO_SDATA_SET ;` This statement is executed if the `flag_pic` variable is true, and it sets the `target_flags` variable to include the `MASK_NO_SDATA_SET` flag." GCC,arc,249,"Based on the code snippet you provided, it appears to be part of a switch statement that is handling different types of addresses. The next statement after the one you provided would likely be the next case in the switch statement, which would be for the PLUS case. In the PLUS case, the code checks if the address is a small symbol reference by calling the SYMBOL_REF_SMALL_P function. If it is, it outputs the address as a constant using the output_addr_const function. If it is not a small symbol reference, it checks if the address is a multiplication of two" GCC,arc,250,"It's difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it appears to be part of a larger program and the context is not provided. However, based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the next statement could be a call to the `fprintf` function, as the `if` statement checks if the `SYMBOL_REF_SMALL_P` macro evaluates to true for the `addr` variable, and if so, it prints a string literal to the `file` variable using `fprintf`." GCC,arc,251,"The next statement of this code snippet is: rtx srcLow = simplify_gen_subreg ( SImode , src , DFmode , ) ;" GCC,arc,252,"Based on the code snippet you provided, it appears to be a part of a function that is checking if a certain condition is met, and if so, it is emitting some instructions. The next statement of the code snippet you provided is: `if ( state == none ) return false ;` This statement is checking if the `state` variable is equal to `none`, and if so, it is returning `false` from the function." GCC,arc,253,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `int start_call = frame->millicode_start_reg;`" GCC,arc,254,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `*pretend_size = (MAX_ARC_PARM_REGS - first_reg_offset) * UNITS_PER_WORD;` This statement is assigning the value of `pretend_size` to be the result of the expression `(MAX_ARC_PARM_REGS - first_reg_offset) * UNITS_PER_WORD`. The expression is calculating the size of the register block that needs to be moved, based on the number of registers used by the function and the offset of the first anonymous" GCC,arc,255,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `JUMP_LABEL (insn) = emit_label (insn);` This statement sets the jump label for the jump instruction `insn` to the label `emit_label (insn)`." GCC,arc,256,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet without knowing the specific implementation of the `emit_unlikely_jump` function. However, based on the name of the function, it is likely that it is related to the emission of a jump instruction in the generated assembly code. In this case, the next statement of the code snippet is likely to be the emission of the jump instruction itself, using the `insn` parameter as the target of the jump. The exact form of the jump instruction will depend on the specific implementation of the `emit_unlikely_jump` function and the target" GCC,arc,257,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `if ( TARGET_HARD_FLOAT && ( ( cmode == SFmode && TARGET_FP_SP_BASE ) || ( cmode == DFmode && TARGET_FP_DP_BASE ) ) )` This is a conditional statement that checks if the target hardware has a floating-point unit and if the comparison mode is single-precision or double-precision. If the condition is true, the code will emit an instruction to compare the two operands using the floating-point compare instruction." GCC,arc,258,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet without knowing the specific values of the variables and the context in which the code is being executed. However, based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the next statement will be an `emit_insn` call, which will generate an instruction to be executed by the target machine. The instruction will be a `SET` instruction, which will set the value of a register to a specific value. The register and value will be determined by the values of the `operands` array and the `code` variable, which are not shown in the code snippet." GCC,arc,259,"The next statement is likely to be: `emit_insn (gen_rtx_SET (operands[], operands[]));` This is because the code snippet is checking if the operands are valid for the `emit_insn` function, and if they are not, it will rewrite the small data pattern and emit the instruction. If the operands are valid, it will emit the instruction directly." GCC,arc,260,"Based on the code snippet you provided, it appears to be a part of a function that is checking if a memory location is valid and if it is, it is forcing the memory location to be a register. The next statement of the code snippet you provided would be: `rtx addr = copy_to_mode_reg ( Pmode , XEXP ( operands [ ] , ) ) ;` This line of code is copying the memory location at `XEXP ( operands [ ] ," GCC,arc,261,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `succ0 = next_real_insn (insn)` This statement assigns the next real instruction after `insn` to the variable `succ0`. The `next_real_insn` function returns the next instruction that is not a label or a note." GCC,arc,262,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `emit_insn_before ( gen_nopv ( ) , succ0 ) ;` This statement is emitting a NOP (No Operation) instruction before the successor block `succ0`. The `gen_nopv` function is used to generate a NOP instruction, and the `emit_insn_before` function is used to emit the instruction before the specified block." GCC,arc,263,"Based on the code snippet you provided, it appears to be part of a function that calculates the cost of a memory address. The function is checking the type of the memory address and returning a cost based on that type. The next statement of the code snippet you provided is: case PLUS : { register rtx plus0 = XEXP ( addr , ) ; register rtx plus1 = XEXP ( addr , ) ; if ( GET_CODE ( plus0 ) != REG && ( GET_CODE ( plus0 ) !=" GCC,arc,264,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `if ( GET_CODE ( SET_SRC ( scanbody ) ) == IF_THEN_ELSE ) fail = TRUE ;` This statement is part of a switch statement that checks the type of instruction in the body of the current instruction. If the instruction is a conditional jump, the `fail` variable is set to `TRUE`." GCC,arc,265,"The code snippet you provided is a part of the GCC compiler's source code, specifically the file ""arc.md"" which implements the ARC instruction set architecture. The code you provided is a function that takes a single argument `x` and performs a series of checks on it. If the checks pass, the function returns a value, otherwise it returns NULL. Here's a breakdown of the code: 1. `else if (GET_CODE (x) == PLUS && (REG_P (gp = XEXP (x, 0)) && REG" GCC,arc,266,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `rtx dest = gen_reg_rtx ( Pmode ) ;` This statement is generating a new register with the same mode as the previous register, and storing it in the `dest` variable." GCC,arc,267,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `emit_insn ( pat ) ;` This statement emits the instruction represented by the `pat` variable as an assembly instruction. The `emit_insn` function is used to generate the assembly code for the instruction." GCC,arc,268,"The next statement of this code snippet is: pat = gen_rtx_SET ( baseptr_rtx , pat ) ; This statement is setting the value of the base pointer register (baseptr_rtx) to the value of the pat register, which was previously set to the result of the arc_unspec_offset function." GCC,arc,269,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return reg;` This is because the `if` statement checks if `arc_tp_regno` is not equal to `-1`, and if it is not, it returns the result of `gen_rtx_REG(Pmode, arc_tp_regno)`. However, since `arc_tp_regno` is equal to `-1`, the `if` statement is not executed, and the code continues to the next statement, which is `return reg;`." GCC,arc,270,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `emit_move_insn ( reg , gen_rtx_REG ( Pmode , R0_REG ) ) ;` This statement moves the value stored in the register `R0_REG` to the register `reg`. The `emit_move_insn` function is used to generate the move instruction. The `gen_rtx_REG` function is used to create a new register operand with the specified mode and number. The `Pmode` parameter is used to specify the mode of the register." GCC,arc,271,"The next statement is: `arc_init_reg_tables ( ) ;` This is a function call that initializes the register tables for the ARC architecture." GCC,arc,272,"Based on the code snippet you provided, it appears to be initializing some tables and registering passes for the ARC architecture. The next statement is likely to be a call to `register_pass` to register the `arc_ifcvt5_info` pass." GCC,arc,273,"Based on the code snippet you provided, it appears that the next statement will be: `arc_mode_class[i] = ( << (int) S_MODE);` This is because the previous `if` statement was not executed, and the `else if` statement that checks for the size of the mode is not executed either. Therefore, the next statement that will be executed is the `else` statement, which sets `arc_mode_class[i]` to a value based on the size of the mode." GCC,arc,274,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific values of the variables and the behavior of the functions being called. However, based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the next statement will be: arc_mode_class[i] = << (int) C_MODE; This is because the code is currently in the ""case MODE_CC"" block, and the next statement after the ""else if"" statement is the assignment of the value << (int) C_" GCC,arc,275,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `if ( align_labels_log < ) {` This is because the code snippet ends with a conditional statement that checks if `align_labels_log` is less than ``. If this condition is true, the code inside the `if` block will be executed." GCC,arc,276,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `if ( ( GET_MODE_SIZE ( mode ) != ) && CONSTANT_P ( x ) )` This is a continuation of the previous `if` statement, which checks if the mode size is not equal to a certain value and if `x` is a constant. If both conditions are true, then the code inside the `if` block will be executed." GCC,arc,277,"The next statement after the `if` statement is `return true;`. The first `if` statement checks if the expression `x` is a pre-decrement, pre-increment, post-decrement, or post-increment expression, and if the base of the expression is a valid base register. If the expression is a pre-decrement or pre-increment, the base register must be a valid base register for the addressing mode. If the expression is a post-decrement or post-increment, the base register must be a valid base register for the addressing mode, and the offset must" GCC,arc,278,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `x = XEXP ( x , ) ;` This statement is assigning the value of `XEXP ( x , )` to the variable `x`. The `` placeholder is a token that represents a number literal, which is used to index into the `XEXP` array. The `XEXP` array is a data structure used to represent expressions in the GCC compiler." GCC,arc,279,"Based on the code snippet you provided, it appears that the next statement will be: case ARC_UNSPEC_PLT : This is because the code is checking the value of XINT ( x , ) and if it matches the value of ARC_UNSPEC_PLT, it will execute the code inside the case statement." GCC,arc,280,"The next statement of the code snippet is: `if (GET_CODE(addr) != CONST) return false;` This statement checks if the `GET_CODE` of the `addr` operand is not equal to `CONST`. If it is not, the function returns `false`." GCC,arc,281,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return arc_needs_pcl_p ( addr );` This statement is executed if the condition `GET_CODE ( addr ) != CONST` is true, which means that the `addr` operand is not a constant. The function `arc_needs_pcl_p` is called with the `addr` operand as an argument, and its return value is returned as the result of the `arc_legitimate_pc_offset_p` function." GCC,arc,282,"The next statement after the `if` block in the code snippet is `return false;`. The `if` block checks if the `GET_CODE` of `addr` is not equal to `UNSPEC` or if the number of elements in the vector `addr` is not equal to ``. If either of these conditions is true, the function returns `false`. Therefore, if the `if` block is not executed, the function will return `true`." GCC,arc,283,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `if (model != ) return arc_legitimize_tls_address (orig_x, model);` This statement checks if the TLS model of the symbol reference is not equal to ``. If it is not equal, the function `arc_legitimize_tls_address` is called with the symbol reference and the TLS model as arguments, and the function returns the result of that call. If the TLS model is equal to ``, the function continues to" GCC,arc,284,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return arc_legitimize_tls_address ( orig_x , model ) ;` This is because the `if` statement checks if the `model` variable is equal to ``, and if it is not, it returns the result of the `arc_legitimize_tls_address` function with the `orig_x` and `model` parameters." GCC,arc,285,"The next statement of this code snippet is: emit_insn (gen_rtx_SET (oldx, gen_rtx_fmt_ee (code, SImode, oldx, const0_rtx))); Explanation: The code snippet is part of a function that is trying to generate a PIC (Position Independent Code) address. The function takes an address as input and tries to convert it into a PIC address. The address is represented as an RTL expression, which is a tree-like data structure used by the GCC compiler to represent instructions and" GCC,arc,286,"The next statement of this code snippet is: v = gen_rtvec ( , addr , base ) ; Explanation: The code snippet is part of a function that is generating a runtime vector (rtvec) for a symbol reference. The rtvec is used to represent a memory location in the generated code. The function is checking various conditions to determine the correct base name for the symbol reference, and then generating the rtvec with the appropriate base and address. In this case, the base name is determined to be ""DTPOFF_Z" GCC,arc,287,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `if ( ( GET_CODE ( PATTERN ( jump ) ) == PARALLEL ) && ( XVECEXP ( PATTERN ( jump ) , , ) == ret_rtx ) ) return false ;` This statement checks if the jump instruction is a parallel instruction and if the first element of its pattern is the return instruction. If this is the case, the function returns false." GCC,arc,288,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be a `case` statement, as the `switch` statement is used to select different actions based on the value of `XINT ( x , )`. The `case` statements following the `switch` statement are checking for specific values of `XINT ( x , )` and executing the corresponding code blocks." GCC,arc,289,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `fmt = GET_RTX_FORMAT ( GET_CODE ( x ) ) ;` This line retrieves the format of the rtx `x` using the `GET_RTX_FORMAT` macro. The format is a string that describes the structure of the rtx, and it is used to determine the types of the operands of the rtx." GCC,arc,290,"The next statement of this code snippet is: intval = (REG_P(operands[]) ? : CONST_INT_P(operands[]) ? INTVAL(operands[]) : ); This is a ternary operator, which is a shorthand for an if-else statement. The condition is REG_P(operands[]), and if it is true, the value of" GCC,arc,291,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific values of the variables and the behavior of the functions called. However, based on the information provided, it appears that the code is checking whether a given operand is a constant and, if so, whether it satisfies certain constraints. If the operand does not satisfy the constraints, the code will modify the operand and generate a new pattern. The next statement of the code snippet is likely to be the `else if` block, which checks whether the operand satisfies the constraint `C2p`. If the" GCC,arc,292,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet without knowing the specific values of the variables and constants used in the code. However, based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the next statement will be a call to the `arc_output_pic_addr_const` function, which is used to output a PIC (Position-Independent Code) address constant. The function takes three arguments: a file pointer, a PIC address constant, and a code. The function will output the PIC address constant to the file in a format that is appropriate for the target architecture." GCC,arc,293,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return word_mode;` This is because the `switch` statement is checking the value of `TARGET_PLUS_QMACW` and `SImode`, and if neither of those conditions are true, it will return `word_mode`." GCC,arc,294,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be: `gcc_assert ( GET_CODE ( XEXP ( c , ) ) == CONST_INT ) ;` This is because the previous statement `gcc_assert ( GET_CODE ( XEXP ( c , ) ) == SYMBOL_REF ) ;` checks if the expression `XEXP ( c , )` is a symbol reference, and if it is, then the next statement will check if it is a constant integer." GCC,arc,295,"The next statement in the code snippet is: arc_output_pic_addr_const ( file , c , ) ; This is because the code is checking if the operand address is a constant, and if it is, it outputs the constant value to the file. The specific constant value being output is determined by the value of the parameter, which is not specified in the code snippet." GCC,arc,296,"The next statement of this code snippet is: rtx srcLow = simplify_gen_subreg ( SImode , src , DFmode , TARGET_BIG_ENDIAN ? : ) ;" GCC,arc,297,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the code depends on the values of the variables `TARGET_ARC700`, `from_class`, and ``. However, based on the code snippet you provided, it appears that the code is checking if the target architecture is ARC700 and if the `from_class` variable is equal to one of the following values: `LPCOUNT_REG`, `ALL_CORE_REGS`, or `WRITABLE_CORE_REGS" GCC,arc,298,"The next statement after the `if` block is `return false;`. The `if` block is only executed if the condition `GET_CODE ( x ) == SYMBOL_REF && SYMBOL_REF_SMALL_P ( x )` is true. If this condition is not true, the `if` block is skipped and the code continues to the next statement, which is `return false;`." GCC,arc,299,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `if (GET_CODE(x) == SYMBOL_REF && SYMBOL_REF_SMALL_P(x)) {` This is because the previous `if` statement checks if `x` is a `CONST` and if it is, it sets `x` to the first operand of `x`. If `x` is not a `CONST`, the next `if` statement checks if `x` is a `PLUS` and if it is, it sets `x` to the second operand" GCC,arc,300,"The next statement of this code snippet is: *total = COSTS_N_INSNS(); Explanation: The code snippet is a part of the GCC compiler, specifically the function ""rtx_cost"" which calculates the cost of a given expression in terms of the number of instructions it takes to execute. The function uses a switch statement to handle different types of expressions, and the next statement is the default case for the switch statement. The default case is reached when the expression is not a symbol reference, constant double, or" GCC,arc,301,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be: `if ( ! producer ) return false ;` This is because the code is checking if the `producer` variable is null or not, and if it is null, the function returns false. If the `producer` variable is not null, the code continues to the next statement, which is the `if` statement that checks if the `consumer` variable is null or not." GCC,arc,302,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `if ( ! MEM_P ( out_addr ) ) return false ;` This statement checks if the `out_addr` is not a memory address, and if it is not, the function returns `false`." GCC,arc,303,The next statement after `case V4HImode : case V2SImode : return TARGET_PLUS_QMACW ;` is `case V4SImode : case V8HImode : return TARGET_SIMD_SET ;`. GCC,arc,304,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet without knowing the specific implementation of the `emit_unlikely_jump` function. However, based on the name of the function, it is likely that it is related to the emission of a jump instruction in the generated assembly code. In this case, the next statement of the code snippet is likely to be the emission of the jump instruction itself, using the `insn` parameter as the target of the jump. The exact form of the jump instruction will depend on the specific implementation of the `emit_unlikely_jump` function and the target" GCC,arc,305,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be a call to the `emit_barrier` function, which is used to insert a barrier instruction in the RTL code. The `emit_barrier` function takes a `rtx_insn *` argument, which is the address of the instruction that should be used as the target of the barrier. Here is an example of how the code snippet might continue: ``` rtx_insn * barrier = emit_barrier ( jump ) ; ``` This code creates a new barrier instruction and sets its target to" GCC,arc,306,"The code snippet you provided is a part of the GCC compiler's RTL (Register Transfer Language) code, which is used to generate assembly code for various architectures. The code you provided is a part of the `legitimize_address` function, which is responsible for ensuring that the address of a memory operand is valid for the target architecture. The code you provided is checking if the memory operand is a valid address for the target architecture, and if not, it is trying to convert it into a valid address. The next statement of the code snippet you provided is" GCC,arc,307,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `rtx temp = (reload_in_progress ? operands[] : flag_pic ? gen_reg_rtx(Pmode) : NULL_RTX);` This statement declares a variable `temp` of type `rtx` and initializes it with the result of a ternary expression. The expression checks the value of the `reload_in_progress` flag and the `flag_pic` flag, and based on their values, it either returns the value of `operands[quick_push(); sizes->quick_push();`. This is because the `if` statement checks if `TARGET_PLUS_QMACW` is true, and if it is, it executes the two `quick_push` statements." GCC,arc,310,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `quick_push` function and the values of the `sizes` and `` variables. However, based on the syntax and the fact that `quick_push` is being called twice, it is likely that the next statement will be another call to `quick_push`, possibly with different arguments." GCC,arc,311,"The next statement of this code snippet is: return gen_raw_REG ( Pmode , FRAME_POINTER_REGNUM ) ; This statement returns a raw register value, which is a register that is not associated with any particular type or mode. The register value is obtained by calling the gen_raw_REG function, which takes two arguments: the first is the mode of the register (in this case, Pmode), and the second is the register number (in this case, FRAME_POINTER_REGNUM)." GCC,arc,312,"The next statement of this code snippet is: return gen_rtx_MEM (Pmode, stack_pointer_rtx);" GCC,arc,313,"The next statement after the code snippet you provided is: `return ( ( to == FRAME_POINTER_REGNUM ) || ! arc_frame_pointer_needed ( ) );` This statement is a return statement that returns a boolean value indicating whether the frame pointer is needed or not. The frame pointer is needed if the `to` register is equal to `FRAME_POINTER_REGNUM` or if the `arc_frame_pointer_needed` function returns `true`. Otherwise, the frame pointer is not needed." GCC,arc,314,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return ( ( to == FRAME_POINTER_REGNUM ) || ! arc_frame_pointer_needed ( ) );` This statement is a return statement that returns a boolean value indicating whether the arc can eliminate the frame pointer or not. The return value is determined by the value of the `to` parameter and the result of the `arc_frame_pointer_needed()` function. If the `to` parameter is equal to the frame pointer register number, or if the `arc_frame_pointer_needed()` function" GCC,arc,315,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `frame_info->total_size = total_size;` This statement assigns the value of `total_size` to the `total_size` field of the `frame_info` structure." GCC,arc,316,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return fun -> machine -> fn_type = fn_type ;` This statement is the last statement in the `if` block, and it returns the value of `fn_type` to the caller of the function." GCC,arc,317,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be: `mem = (rtx)arc_compute_frame_size(afi);` This is because the `arc_compute_frame_size` function is called with the `afi` parameter, which is a pointer to a `struct arc_frame_info` structure. The function is likely to return a value of type `rtx`, which is then assigned to the `mem` variable." GCC,arc,318,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be the body of the `if` statement that checks whether `ARC_INTERRUPT_P ( cfun -> machine -> fn_type )` is true. Within this `if` statement, the code is likely to perform some actions related to handling interrupts in the ARC processor. The exact actions taken will depend on the specific implementation of the ARC processor and the requirements of the code being compiled." GCC,arc,319,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return ( ( regno == arc_return_address_register ( fn_type ) ) || ( regno == RETURN_ADDR_REGNUM ) ) ;` This statement is executed if the `fixed_regs` array does not contain the value of `regno`. It checks if `regno` is equal to the return address register for the current function (`arc_return_address_register ( fn_type )`) or if it is equal to the return address register for the current architecture (`RETURN_ADDR_" GCC,arc,320,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `if ( arc_must_save_return_addr ( cfun ) && ! ARC_AUTOBLINK_IRQ_P ( fn_type ) )`" GCC,arc,321,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be: `src_addr = force_offsettable ( XEXP ( operands [ ] , ) , size , ) ;` This is because the code is using the `force_offsettable` function to generate an offsettable address for the source operand, which is stored in `src_addr`. The function takes three arguments: the expression to be offset, the size of the memory access, and the alignment of the memory access. The code is using" GCC,arc,322,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `i ^= , size -= piece` This is the third statement of the `for` loop, which updates the loop counter `i` and the remaining size `size` of the memory block to be copied. The `^=` operator is used to perform a bitwise XOR operation on `i` and ``, which is a constant value. The `-=` operator is used to subtract the value of `piece` from `size`." GCC,arc,323,"The next statement is likely to be another call to `asm_fprintf`, as the pattern of the previous two statements suggests that the code is printing out a series of values to the output file. The next statement could be: `asm_fprintf ( asm_out_file , , TARGET_RF16 ? : ) ;` This would print out another value to the output file, using the same format string as the previous two statements. The value to be printed would depend on" GCC,arc,324,"Based on the code snippet you provided, it appears to be a part of an assembly language program. The `asm_fprintf` function is being used to print out various values to a file. The first argument to `asm_fprintf` is the file to print to, which is represented by the variable `asm_out_file`. The second argument is a string literal that specifies the format of the output. The third argument is a value that is being printed. Based on the code snippet, it is difficult to predict the exact output of the program, as it depends on the values of" GCC,arc,325,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `memset(&arc_ccfsm_current, , sizeof(arc_ccfsm_current));` This statement is initializing the `arc_ccfsm_current` variable with the value ``. The `memset` function is used to set the value of the variable to `` by filling the memory location of the variable with the value ``. The `sizeof` operator is used to get the size of the variable, which is used as" GCC,arc,326,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific inputs and the behavior of the functions being called. However, based on the code snippet you provided, it appears that the next statement will be: `TYPE_ATTRIBUTES ( fntype ) = attrs ;` This statement is assigning the `attrs` list to the `TYPE_ATTRIBUTES` field of the `fntype` tree. The `TYPE_ATTRIBUTES` field is a list of attributes associated with the type" GCC,arc,327,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific input and the behavior of the functions called within the snippet. However, based on the code provided, it appears that the snippet is checking the type of a tree node and its attributes, and potentially modifying the attributes of a variable declaration. The first `if` statement checks the type of the `arg` tree node, and if it is not an integer constant, it prints a warning message and sets the `no_add_attrs` flag to `true`. The second `if` statement checks" GCC,arc,328,"The next statement after the `if` block is: `return ( cfun -> machine -> frame_info . total_size - cfun -> machine -> frame_info . pretend_size ) ;`" GCC,arc,329,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return ( cfun -> machine -> frame_info . total_size - cfun -> machine -> frame_info . pretend_size ) ;` This statement returns the difference between the total size of the stack frame and the pretend size of the stack frame. The `cfun` variable is a pointer to the current function, and the `machine` field is a pointer to the machine-specific data for the function. The `frame_info` field is a structure that contains information about the stack frame, including the total size and pretend size" GCC,arc,330,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return false;` The `lookup_attribute` function is called with the string literal `` and the `attrs` variable, which is the result of `TYPE_ATTRIBUTES` applied to `ttype`. If the attribute is found, the function returns `true`, otherwise it returns `false`. Since the `lookup_attribute` function is not shown in the code snippet, it is not possible to determine the exact behavior of the code. However, based on the context, it appears that the function is searching for" GCC,arc,331,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return ;` The `if` statement checks if `INSN_P ( next )` is true and if `recog_memoized ( next )` is greater than or equal to ``. If both conditions are true, the function returns ``." GCC,arc,332,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be: `align_labels_log = ` This is because the `if` statement checks whether `align_labels_log` is less than ``, and if it is, it sets `align_labels_log` to ``." GCC,arc,333,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return true;` This is because the `if` statement is checking if the `GET_CODE` of `x` is one of the specified codes (`PRE_DEC`, `PRE_INC`, `POST_DEC`, or `POST_INC`) and if `RTX_OK_FOR_BASE_P` is true for `XEXP (x, )` with `strict` set to true. If this condition is met, the function returns `true`. If the condition is" GCC,arc,334,"The next statement after the code snippet you provided is: `return false;` This is because the code snippet you provided is a function that checks whether a given expression `x` is a legitimate address for a memory operation in the ARC architecture. If the expression is not a legitimate address, the function returns `false`." GCC,arc,335,The next statement after the `break` statement is the `case` statement with the label ``. GCC,arc,336,"Based on the code snippet you provided, it appears to be a part of a function that is generating assembly code for a specific architecture. The code is using a number of macros and functions that are not defined in the snippet you provided, so it's difficult to give a precise answer. However, based on the context, it appears that the code is trying to generate a call instruction for a function. The first part of the code is setting up some variables and checking if a certain condition is met. If the condition is not met, the code will jump to a different part of the function. The second part of" GCC,arc,337,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return ;` This is because the `if` statement checks if `to_class` is equal to `MPY_WRITABLE_CORE_REGS`, and if it is, the function returns the value of ``. If `to_class` is not equal to `MPY_WRITABLE_CORE_REGS`, the function will continue to the next statement, which is the `return` statement." GCC,arc,338,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `if ( GET_CODE ( op0 ) == ZERO_EXTRACT && XEXP ( op0 , ) == const1_rtx && ( GET_CODE ( op ) == EQ || GET_CODE ( op ) == NE ) ) { op0 = XEXP ( cmp0 , ) ; op1 = XEXP ( cmp0 , ) ; }` This statement checks if the first operand of the comparison operation is" GCC,arc,339,"The next statement of this code snippet is: regno = ILINK1_REGNUM;" GCC,arc,340,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `if (MEM_P(op) && !LEGITIMATE_SMALL_DATA_ADDRESS_P(XEXP(op, )))` This is a conditional statement that checks if `op` is a memory operand and if the address of the memory operand is not a legitimate small data address. If the condition is true, the code inside the `if` block will be executed." GCC,arc,341,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet without knowing the context and the specific values of the variables involved. However, based on the code snippet you provided, it appears that the code is checking if the current instruction is a `PLUS` instruction and if the operand at a specific index (represented by ``) is equal to a certain value (represented by `rgp`). If these conditions are met, the code skips over the subroutines. Without more information, it is not possible to predict exactly what the next statement of this code snippet" GCC,arc,342,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `sri->icode = in_p ? CODE_FOR_reload_qi_load : CODE_FOR_reload_qi_store;` This statement is assigning a value to the `icode` field of the `sri` structure, based on the value of the `in_p` variable. If `in_p` is true, the value assigned to `icode` is `CODE_FOR_reload_qi_load`, otherwise it is `CODE_FOR_reload_qi_store`." GCC,arc,343,"The code snippet you provided is a C function that appears to be part of a compiler or assembler. It is difficult to predict the next statement with certainty without knowing the context and the specific implementation of the function. However, based on the code snippet you provided, it seems that the function is checking whether a certain condition is met, and if it is not, it returns a value. The function takes a pointer to a structure called `cfun` as an argument, and it uses this pointer to access the `force_short_suffix` field of the structure. It then checks whether this field is" GCC,arc,344,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `machine = &insn->deps->machine;`" GCC,arc,345,"Based on the code snippet you provided, it appears to be a function that checks whether a memory address is a valid small data address. The function takes a mode and an address as input, and returns true if the address is a valid small data address and false otherwise. The function first checks if the size of the memory access is greater than the size of a word, and if so, returns false. Then, it checks if the address is a legitimate small data address, and if not, returns false. If the address is a legitimate small data address, the function checks if the address is aligned to" GCC,arc,346,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the code depends on the specific values of the variables and the implementation of the `FOR_EACH_SUBRTX` macro. However, based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the `FOR_EACH_SUBRTX` macro is being used to iterate over the elements of an array, and the `const_rtx` variable `x` is being assigned the value of each element in turn. Therefore, the next statement of the code snippet is likely to be" GCC,arc,347,"The next statement of this code snippet is: case E_CC_FPXmode : switch ( GET_CODE ( comparison ) ) { case EQ : return ARC_CC_EQ ; case NE : return ARC_CC_NE ; case UNORDERED : return ARC_CC_C ;" GCC,arc,348,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `while (comma) {` This is because the code is currently executing the `if` statement, and the condition `! (last & )` is not true, so the code will continue executing the `else` block. The next statement in the `else` block is the `while` loop." GCC,arc,349,"The next statement is: `case :` This is a `case` statement in a `switch` block, which is used to select one of several code blocks to execute based on the value of `xreg`. The value of `xreg` is determined by the `decode_reg_name` function, which is called on the string `str` in the line above. The `case` statement is used to handle the case where `xreg` is equal to a specific value, which is represented by ``." GCC,arc,350,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `errno = 0;` Explanation: The code snippet is parsing a command-line option that specifies a banked register. The `errno` variable is set to 0 to indicate that there is no error. The `strtol` function is used to convert the option argument to a long integer. If there is an error or if the argument is not a valid banked register, the `error` function is called with an error message." GCC,arc,351,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `error ( , arg ) ;` This is because the `if` statement is checking for various error conditions, and if any of them are true, it will execute the `error` function with the appropriate error message. The `error` function takes two string literals and an argument, and it is called with the appropriate error message and the `arg` argument." GCC,arc,352,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `if ( MEM_P ( operands [ ] ) && ! cse_not_expected ) {`" GCC,arc,353,"The code snippet you provided is a part of the GCC compiler's code generation for the ARC architecture. It appears to be a function that generates instructions to load a value from memory into a register. The function takes several parameters, including the mode of the memory access (SImode), the memory address, and the register to load the value into. It also uses several global variables, such as TARGET_NO_SDATA_SET, which appears to be a flag that controls whether the compiler should use small data access instructions. The function first checks if the memory address is a small data" GCC,arc,354,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the program depends on the specific values of the variables and the state of the program at the time of execution. However, based on the code snippet provided, it is likely that the next statement will be a dereference of the `const_rtx` pointer `x`, which will return the value of the `rtx` object that `x` points to. The syntax `*iter` suggests that `iter` is an iterator that points to a collection of `rtx` objects, and the statement `" GCC,arc,355,"The next statement of this code snippet is: return gen_rtx_MEM (Pmode, stack_pointer_rtx);" GCC,arc,356,"Based on the code snippet provided, it appears to be a part of a function that is calculating the size of a stack frame for a function. The function is using a number of variables and constants to determine the size of the frame, including the size of the function's arguments, the size of the function's local variables, and the size of any registers that need to be saved. The next statement of the code snippet is likely to be the calculation of the total size of the stack frame, which is likely to be done by adding up the various sizes that have been calculated so far. The total size of the" GCC,arc,357,"The next statement in the code snippet is: `frame_info -> save_return_addr = ( ! crtl -> is_leaf || df_regs_ever_live_p ( RETURN_ADDR_REGNUM ) || crtl -> calls_eh_return ) ;` This statement sets the `save_return_addr` field of the `frame_info` structure to a value based on the current function's properties. The value is determined by the `is_leaf`, `df_regs_ever_live_p`, and `calls_eh_" GCC,arc,358,"The next statement is: arc_regno_reg_class[PCL_REG] = NO_REGS;" GCC,arc,359,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `if ( ! gmask ) return false ;` This statement checks if the `gmask` variable is zero, and if so, returns `false`. If `gmask` is not zero, the code continues to the next statement." GCC,arc,360,"The next statement after the given code snippet is: return true;" GCC,arc,361,"Based on the code snippet provided, it is difficult to predict the next statement with certainty. However, based on the context and the control flow of the code, it is likely that the next statement will be related to the handling of the function's frame and stack. The code snippet appears to be part of a function epilogue, which is the final part of a function that deals with cleaning up the stack frame and returning control to the caller. The code is checking various conditions and adjusting the stack pointer and frame pointer as needed to restore the state of the caller. Based on the" GCC,arc,362,"Based on the code snippet you provided, it appears that the next statement will be: `size_to_deallocate -= arc_restore_callee_milli(gmask, restore_blink, restore_fp, return_p, first_offset);` This is because the `if` statement that precedes this line checks whether `TARGET_CODE_DENSITY` and `TARGET_CODE_DENSITY_FRAME` are both true, and whether `ARC_AUTOFP_IRQ_P(fn_type" GCC,arc,363,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be: `frame_size_to_allocate -= arc_save_callee_saves ( gmask, save_blink, save_fp, first_offset );` This is because the previous statement, `if ( frame -> millicode_end_reg > )`, checks if the `millicode_end_reg` field of the `frame` structure is greater than a certain value, and if so, it calls the `arc_save_callee_milli` function. However," GCC,arc,364,"The next statement of this code snippet is: register_pass ( & arc_ifcvt4_info ) ; Explanation: The code snippet defines two structs, `arc_ifcvt4_info` and `arc_ifcvt5_info`, which are used to register passes. The first pass, `pass_arc_ifcvt_4`, is created using the `make_pass_arc_ifcvt` function, and the second pass, `pass_arc_ifcvt_4->clone()`, is created by cloning the first" GCC,arc,365,"Based on the code snippet provided, it is difficult to predict the next statement with certainty. However, based on the context and the patterns in the code, it is likely that the next statement will be a case statement or a switch statement that handles different values of the `arc_tune` variable. The code snippet appears to be part of a function that initializes the ARC processor and sets up various parameters for the compiler. The function appears to be checking the value of the `arc_tune` variable and setting up different parameters based on that value. The next statement is likely to be a case statement" GCC,arc,366,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `attrs = TYPE_ATTRIBUTES ( TREE_TYPE ( TREE_OPERAND ( addr , ) ) ) ;` This line of code assigns the type attributes of the operand of the address expression `addr` to the variable `attrs`. The type attributes are obtained by calling the `TYPE_ATTRIBUTES` function on the type of the operand, which is obtained by calling the `TREE_TYPE` function on the operand. The ` ) ) == PLUS && rtx_equal_p ( XEXP ( ( x ) , ) , XEXP ( XEXP ( x , ) , ) ) && legitimate_offset_address_p" GCC,arc,368,"The next statement of this code snippet is: return ! ( offset > - && offset < ) ; This statement is a return statement that returns a boolean value indicating whether the offset is within the range of - to . The offset is calculated from the addend of the memory address, which is obtained by calling the INTVAL function on the addend." GCC,arc,369,"Based on the code snippet you provided, it seems like the next statement would be: case : firq_auto_save_p &= ( ( regno < ) || ( ( regno > ) && ( regno < ) ) ) ; break ; This is because the switch statement is checking the value of `rgf_banked_register_count` and executing the corresponding case statement. The next case statement after the one you provided is `case " GCC,arc,370,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `RTX_FRAME_RELATED_P ( insn ) = ;` This statement sets the `RTX_FRAME_RELATED_P` field of the `insn` variable to the value of ``. The `RTX_FRAME_RELATED_P` field is a flag that indicates whether the instruction is related to the frame pointer." GCC,arc,371,"The code snippet you provided is a part of a function that appears to be generating assembly code for a stack frame. It is difficult to predict the exact next statement without knowing the context and the purpose of the function. However, based on the code you provided, it appears that the function is iterating over a range of registers and performing some operations on each register. The next statement is likely to be another iteration of the loop, with the `regno` variable being incremented and the `off` variable being updated to point to the next register in the frame. The function may also be generating additional assembly code to restore" GCC,arc,372,"Based on the code snippet provided, it is difficult to predict the next statement with certainty. The code appears to be part of a function that is dealing with frame pointers and stack allocation, but the specifics of the function and the context in which it is being called are not provided. However, based on the code snippet, it appears that the next statement could potentially be a call to the `frame_restore_reg` function, which is used to restore a register from the stack. The function takes two arguments: the first is a register, and the second is an offset into the stack. The offset is" GCC,arc,373,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `frame_deallocated += frame_restore_reg ( hard_frame_pointer_rtx , ) ;` This statement is part of the `if ( offset )` block, which is executed if `offset` is non-zero. It adds the result of `frame_restore_reg` to `frame_deallocated`. The `frame_restore_reg` function is not defined in the code snippet, so its behavior is not known. However, based on the name of the function," GCC,arc,374,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `regno = RETURN_ADDR_REGNUM ;` This is because the `else if` clause is executed when the `fn_type` is neither `ARC_FUNCTION_ILINK1` nor `ARC_FUNCTION_FIRQ`, and the `ARC_NORMAL_P` and `ARC_NAKED_P` macros both evaluate to true for the given `fn_type`. Therefore, the `regno` variable is assigned the value of `RETURN_" GCC,arc,375,"The next statement after the `else if` block is: `regno = RETURN_ADDR_REGNUM;`" GCC,arc,376,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `reg = gen_rtx_REG ( Pmode , RETURN_ADDR_REGNUM ) ;` This statement is assigning the value of `RETURN_ADDR_REGNUM` to the variable `reg`, which is a register. The `gen_rtx_REG` function is used to generate a new register with the specified mode and number." GCC,arc,377,"The next statement is: `XVECEXP (insn, , indx) = gen_rtx_SET (mem, reg);`" GCC,arc,378,"Based on the code snippet you provided, it appears to be part of a function that is responsible for generating instructions for a stack frame. The function is setting up the stack frame for a function call, and it is using the `gen_rtx_SET` function to generate instructions that store values in the stack frame. The next statement of the code snippet you provided is: ``` emit_insn ( gen_rtx_SET ( gen_rtx_REG ( Pmode , RETURN_ADDR_REGNUM ) , gen_rtx_MEM ( Pmode , plus_constant" GCC,arc,379,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `frame_allocated += frame_save_reg ( reg , offset ) ;` This statement is part of the `for` loop, and it is executed for each iteration of the loop. It saves the register `reg` to the stack frame at the offset `offset`, and updates the `frame_allocated` variable to reflect the amount of space allocated for the stack frame." GCC,arc,380,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `save_mode = DImode;` Explanation: The code snippet is checking if certain conditions are met, and if so, it sets the `save_mode` variable to `DImode`. The conditions are: * `TARGET_LL64` is true * `(i - ) % == ` * `(gmask & ( << i)) != ` * `(" GCC,arc,381,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `mask = ;` This is because the code is checking the mode of the operand and setting the mask accordingly. If the mode is `E_HImode`, the mask is set to ``." GCC,arc,382,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet without knowing the specific values of the constants and the context in which the code is being executed. However, based on the structure of the code, it appears to be a function that checks whether a given expression is a valid base address for a memory operation. The function takes an expression `op` as input and checks whether it is a valid base address by checking several conditions. The first condition is that the value of the expression `XEXP (op, )` must be equal to ``. If this condition" GCC,arc,383,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return false;` Explanation: The code snippet is a part of a function that checks if a given address is a legitimate small data address. The function uses a `switch` statement to check the type of the address, and then calls different functions to check if the address is legitimate. In the case of the `PLUS` expression, the function checks if the first operand is a `SYMBOL_REF` and if the second operand is a `CONST_INT` that is less than or equal to" GCC,arc,384,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `case PLUS :` This is because the `switch` statement is currently evaluating the `GET_CODE` of `x`, which is `PLUS`. The `case` statement for `PLUS` is the next statement to be executed." GCC,arc,385,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `if ( MEM_P ( operands [ ] ) && ! cse_not_expected ) {` This statement checks if the operand at index `` is a memory operand and if the CSE optimization is not expected. If both conditions are true, the code inside the `if` block will be executed." GCC,arc,386,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific values of the variables and the behavior of the `GEN_FCN` function. However, based on the syntax and the context, it appears that the code is defining a function that takes a single argument `arg` and returns the result of calling the `GEN_FCN` function with the argument and a specific literal value. The `case` statements are likely used to handle different cases based on the value of the argument. Without more information, it is not possible to determine the exact behavior of the code." GCC,arc,387,"The next statement of this code snippet is: return GEN_FCN ( icode ) ( arg [ ] , arg [ ] , arg [ ] , arg [ ] , arg [ ] ) ; This is because the code is using a switch statement to handle different cases based on the value of . The default case is the last case, and it is used to handle any value of that is not explicitly" GCC,arc,388,"Based on the code snippet provided, it is difficult to predict the next statement with certainty. However, based on the context of the code, it appears that the next statement is likely to be a continuation of the `if` statement that checks the value of `REGNO ( dest )`. The code is checking the value of `REGNO ( dest )` against a range of values, and if it falls within that range, it returns a value. It is possible that the next statement will be a continuation of this check, or it could be a statement that handles the case where `REGNO ( dest" GCC,arc,389,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be the `break` statement, as the `if` condition is true. The `if` condition checks whether `insn` is equal to `` or if it is an active instruction that is not a debug instruction, not a note, and has a pattern that is not `UNSPEC_VOLATILE` or `PARALLEL`. If any of these conditions are true, the `break` statement is executed, which exits the loop. Therefore, the next statement of this code snippet is" GCC,arc,390,"It's difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet without knowing the specific values of the variables and the context in which the code is being executed. However, based on the code snippet you provided, it appears that the next statement will be a `switch` statement that checks the value of `plus1` and returns a value based on that value. The `switch` statement will check the value of `plus1` and return a value based on that value. The possible values that `plus1` can take on are `CONST_INT`, `REG`, `CONST`, `SYMBOL" GCC,arc,391,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `new_section->name = name;` Explanation: The code snippet is creating a new `arc_jli_section` structure and initializing its `name` field with the value of the `name` variable. The `new_section` pointer is then assigned to the address of the newly created structure." GCC,arc,392,"The next statement after the `if` block is: `sec = sec -> next;` This statement assigns the value of `sec -> next` to `sec`." GCC,arc,393,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `memcpy(reg_alloc_order, arc_default_alloc_order, sizeof(reg_alloc_order));` This statement copies the contents of the `arc_default_alloc_order` array into the `reg_alloc_order` array. The `memcpy` function is used to perform the copy, and the `sizeof` operator is used to determine the size of the `reg_alloc_order` array." GCC,arc,394,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the function `arc_adjust_reg_alloc_order` is not specified. However, based on the name of the function, it appears to be related to adjusting the register allocation order for some purpose. Without knowing the specific implementation of the function, it is difficult to determine what the next statement of the code will be. However, some possible next statements could include: * Adjusting the register allocation order for a specific register or set of registers * Updating the register allocation order" GCC,arc,395,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `arc_allocate_stack_slots_for_args` function. However, based on the name of the function, it is likely that the next statement will be related to allocating stack slots for function arguments." GCC,arc,396,"The next statement after `return ! ARC_NAKED_P ( fn_type ) ;` is likely to be the end of the function, as the `return` statement is typically used to return a value from a function and then exit the function. Therefore, the next statement after `return ! ARC_NAKED_P ( fn_type ) ;` is likely to be the end of the function, and the program will continue executing the code that follows the function call." GCC,arc,397,"The next statement of this code snippet is: ret = ( ret >= words ? : ret * UNITS_PER_WORD ) ; This statement is assigning the value of ret to either or ret * UNITS_PER_WORD, depending on whether ret is greater than or equal to words." GCC,arc,398,"The code snippet you provided is a part of a function that appears to be checking the validity of an assembly instruction. The function takes an instruction `x` as input and returns a boolean value indicating whether the instruction is valid. The code snippet you provided is checking the case where the instruction is a `PARALLEL` instruction. In this case, the function iterates over the vector of instructions in the `PARALLEL` instruction and checks whether each individual instruction is valid. If any of the instructions in the `PARALLEL` instruction are invalid, the function returns `false`. There" GCC,arc,399,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific values of the variables and the behavior of the functions being called. However, based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the next statement will be: `j += arc_asm_insn_p ( XVECEXP ( x , , i ) ) ;` This statement is part of a loop that iterates over the elements of an array `x` and adds the result of the `arc_asm_insn_p` function to the" GCC,arc,400,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `asm_out` object and the values of the variables `globalize_p`, `align`, `name`, `size`, and ``. However, based on the names of the functions and variables, it appears that this code is generating assembly code for a label directive. The `ASM_OUTPUT_ALIGN` function is used to output an alignment directive, and the `ASM_OUTPUT_TYPE_DIRECTIVE` function is used to" GCC,arc,401,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `asm_fprintf ( f , , ARC_TEMP_SCRATCH_REG ) ;` This statement is printing the value of the `ARC_TEMP_SCRATCH_REG` register to the file `f` using the `asm_fprintf` function. The `` placeholder is used to indicate that the second argument to `asm_fprintf` is a string literal." GCC,arc,402,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be another call to `asm_fprintf`, as the previous two calls have the same format and are likely to be part of a loop or a sequence of instructions that perform a similar task. The first argument of `asm_fprintf` is a file pointer, which is likely to be the same in all three calls. The second argument is a string literal, which is likely to be a format string for the `fprintf` function. The third argument is a register name, which is likely to be the name of a register that contains the value to be printed" GCC,arc,403,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return get_attr_type (insn);` Explanation: The code snippet is a function called `arc_attr_type` that takes an `rtx_insn` pointer as an argument. The function checks the type of instruction using the `NONJUMP_INSN_P`, `JUMP_P`, and `CALL_P` macros, and based on the result, it returns a value from the `get_attr_type` function. The `NONJUMP" GCC,arc,404,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return get_attr_type (insn);` Explanation: The code snippet is a function called `arc_attr_type` that takes an `rtx_insn` pointer as an argument. The function checks the type of instruction using the `NONJUMP_INSN_P`, `JUMP_P`, and `CALL_P` macros, and based on the result, it returns a value from the `get_attr_type` function. The `NONJUMP" GCC,arc,405,"The next statement of the code snippet is: `modes->quick_push(V2HImode);`" GCC,arc,406,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return ! optimize_size && arc_reorg_in_progress;` This statement is a return statement that returns the result of the logical AND operation between the negation of `optimize_size` and `arc_reorg_in_progress`. The negation operator `!` is used to negate the value of `optimize_size`, so if `optimize_size` is true, the result of the AND operation will be false. If `arc_reorg_in_progress` is true, the result of the AND" GCC,arc,407,"The code snippet is generating a call to a function that returns a value in a register. The function is being called with a single argument, which is being passed in the `arg` register. The return value is being stored in the `ret` register. The code is using the `emit_call_insn` function to generate the call instruction, and the `gen_call_value` function to generate the function call expression. The `RTL_CONST_CALL_P` macro is being used to set a flag on the call instruction to indicate that it is a constant call. The `" GCC,arc,408,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be: emit_insn (insn); This is because the previous line of code, RTL_CONST_CALL_P (insn) = , sets the RTL_CONST_CALL_P flag on the insn, which indicates that the insn is a constant call. The use_reg function is then called to mark the ret and arg registers as being used by the insn. Finally, the emit_insn function is called to emit the insn." GCC,arc,409,"The next statement after the given code snippet is likely to be the return value of the function, which is the negation of the result of the `arc_legitimate_constant_p` function. Therefore, the next statement is likely to be: ``` return !arc_legitimate_constant_p ( mode , x ) ; ```" GCC,arc,410,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the function `arc_cannot_substitute_mem_equiv_p` is not specified. However, based on the name of the function, it is likely that it returns a boolean value indicating whether a memory location can be substituted with another memory location. The function takes a single argument, which is a pointer to a `rtx` structure. The `rtx` structure is a data structure used to represent a node in a tree, and it is used to represent the abstract syntax tree (" GCC,arc,411,The next statement after the code snippet you provided is likely to be a closing curly brace (`}`) to end the function. GCC,arc,412,The next statement after the code snippet you provided is likely to be a closing curly brace (`}`) to end the function. GCC,arc,413,"The next statement in the code snippet is: `if (get_attr_type(u.r) == TYPE_BRANCH) {` This is because the `switch` statement is checking the value of `get_attr_type(u.r)`, and if it is equal to `TYPE_BRANCH`, it will execute the code inside the `case TYPE_BRANCH` block." GCC,arc,414,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `if ( arc_lpcwidth != && ( wi :: gtu_p ( iterations_max , ( ( << arc_lpcwidth ) - ) ) || wi :: eq_p ( iterations_max , ) ) ) return false ;` This statement is a continuation of the previous `if` statement, and it checks if the `arc_lpcwidth` is not equal to ``" GCC,arc,415,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `arc_can_use_return_insn` function. However, based on the name of the function, it is likely that it returns a boolean value indicating whether the ARC (Advanced RISC Computing) instruction set architecture can use the `return` instruction." GCC,arc,416,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `int insns_skipped = 0, fail = FALSE, succeed = FALSE;`" GCC,arc,417,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `arc_ccfsm_at_label` function and the input parameters. However, based on the function name and the parameters, it is likely that the next statement will be a call to the `arc_ccfsm_at_label` function with the specified prefix, num, and state parameters." GCC,arc,418,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be the return statement, which will return the value of the `ARC_CCFSM_BRANCH_DELETED_P` macro, which is a function that takes a pointer to a `struct arc_ccfsm` as an argument and returns a boolean value indicating whether the branch has been deleted. Here is the full code snippet with the next statement added: ``` bool arc_ccfsm_branch_deleted_p ( void ) { return ARC_CCFSM_BRANCH_DELE" GCC,arc,419,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be the return statement, which will return the value of the `ARC_CCFSM_BRANCH_DELETED_P` macro, which is a function that takes a pointer to a `struct arc_ccfsm` as an argument and returns a boolean value indicating whether the branch has been deleted. Here is the full code snippet with the next statement added: ``` bool arc_ccfsm_branch_deleted_p ( void ) { return ARC_CCFSM_BRANCH_DELE" GCC,arc,420,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `arc_ccfsm_cond_exec_p` function and the state of the system at the time of execution. However, based on the name of the function and the fact that it is checking a condition, it is likely that the next statement will be a conditional statement, such as an `if` or `switch` statement, that will execute different code based on the result of the condition." GCC,arc,421,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific values of the variables and the behavior of the functions called. However, based on the code snippet, it appears that the next statement will be a call to the `arc_ccfsm_at_label` function, passing in the string literal ``, the code label number of the `insn` variable, and the `state` variable." GCC,arc,422,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `arc_ccfsm_record_condition ( XEXP ( src , ) , XEXP ( src , ) == pc_rtx , insn , state ) ;` This statement is inside the `else` block, which means that the condition `ARC_CCFSM_BRANCH_DELETED_P ( state )` is not true. Therefore, the code inside the `else` block will be executed. The `arc_ccf" GCC,arc,423,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `ARC_CCFSM_RECORD_BRANCH_DELETED` macro and the state of the `arc_ccfsm_current` variable. However, based on the name of the macro and the fact that it is being called with the address of a variable, it is likely that the macro is recording the deletion of a branch in a control flow graph. The `arc_ccfsm_current` variable is likely to be a pointer" GCC,arc,424,"Based on the code snippet provided, it appears to be a part of a function that is handling conditional execution of instructions on a specific architecture. The code is checking if the current instruction is a deleted branch instruction and if it is, it is setting the condition code for the instruction. The next statement of the code snippet is likely to be the following: `state->state = ;` This line of code is setting the state of the instruction to a specific value, which is represented by the placeholder ``. The value of this placeholder is not specified in the" GCC,arc,425,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `state->state = ;` This is because the `else` clause of the `if` statement is executed when the condition `GET_CODE (pat) == COND_EXEC` is not true. In this case, the value of `state->state` is set to ``." GCC,arc,426,"The next statement of this code snippet is: return false; Explanation: The code snippet is checking if the given integer value `ival` is a constant integer that can be represented as a bitwise OR of some number of constants. The first check is to see if `ival` is a power of 2, which is done by checking if the bitwise AND of `ival` and `mask` is equal to `ival`. If it is not a power of 2, the next check is to see if the number of bits set in `mask` is less than or equal to" GCC,arc,427,"Based on the code snippet you provided, it appears to be a part of a function that is checking the validity of a certain operation. The function is checking if the operation is a load operation, and if so, it is checking if the load is a valid load operation. The code snippet you provided is incomplete, so it's difficult to predict the next statement with certainty. However, based on the context, it seems likely that the next statement would be a check to see if the load operation is a valid load operation. This could involve checking the address of the load, the size of the load, and" GCC,arc,428,"The next statement of this code snippet is: if ( ( ival & ~ ) == ) return true ; This statement checks if the bitwise AND of ival and the complement of is equal to . If it is, the function returns true." GCC,arc,429,"The next statement of this code snippet is: if ( ( ival & ~ ) == ) return true ; This is the third statement in the code snippet, and it is identical to the first two statements. The only difference is that the value of is different in each statement." GCC,arc,430,"Based on the code snippet provided, it is difficult to predict the next statement with certainty. However, based on the context and the structure of the code, it is likely that the next statement will be a continuation of the `for` loop. The code snippet is part of a function that appears to be checking the validity of a sequence of `SET` instructions. The function takes a vector of `SET` instructions, `op`, and a boolean value `push_p`, and it checks whether the instructions are valid and whether they can be executed in a specific way. The function first checks the" GCC,arc,431,"The next statement of this code snippet is: arc_clear_unalign();" GCC,arc,432,"The next statement of this code snippet is: arc_clear_unalign();" GCC,arc,433,"Based on the code snippet provided, it is difficult to predict the next statement with certainty. However, based on the context of the code, it appears that the next statement may be related to the calculation of the stack frame size. The code snippet is part of a function that is responsible for generating code for the prologue of a function. The function appears to be calculating the size of the stack frame, which includes the size of the registers that need to be saved, as well as any extra space that may be needed for other purposes. The next statement is likely to be related to the calculation of the" GCC,arc,434,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `fn_type |= ARC_FUNCTION_ILINK1;` This is because the code is checking the value of `TREE_STRING_POINTER ( value )` against several string literals, and if it matches any of them, it sets the `fn_type` variable accordingly. If none of the string literals match, the code reaches the `else` clause and sets `fn_type` to `ARC_FUNCTION_ILINK1`." GCC,arc,435,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific values of the variables and the behavior of the functions being called. However, based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the next statement will be: `fn_type |= ARC_FUNCTION_ILINK1;` This is because the code checks the value of `TREE_STRING_POINTER ( value )` against several string literals, and if it matches any of them, it sets the `fn_type` variable accordingly. If none of the string liter" GCC,arc,436,"The next statement in the code snippet is: `frame->millicode_start_reg = ;` This is because the `if` statement that follows the `for` loop is only executed if the condition `regno - start_reg >= - (crtl->is_leaf == )` is true. The `for` loop increments `regno` until the condition in the loop header is no longer true, and then the `if` statement is executed. The assignment to `frame->millicode_" GCC,arc,437,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `frame->millicode_start_reg = ;` Explanation: The code snippet is a loop that iterates over a range of registers, starting from `start_reg` and ending at `end_reg`. The loop body increments `regno` by 1 for each iteration, and the loop condition checks whether `regno` is less than or equal to `end_reg` and whether the bitwise AND of `gmask` and a value that depends on `regno` is non-" GCC,arc,438,"Based on the code snippet you provided, it appears that the next statement will be: `if ( l1 | l2 | m1 | m2 | s1 | s2 ) {` This is because the code is checking if any of the variables `l1`, `l2`, `m1`, `m2`, `s1`, or `s2` are true. If any of them are true, then the code will execute the block of code inside the `if` statement." GCC,arc,439,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `arc_regno_reg_class[R30_REG] = GENERAL_REGS;`" GCC,arc,440,"The next statement after the given code snippet is: `x = arc_delegitimize_address_0 ( x ) ;` This is because the code snippet ends with a semicolon, which indicates the end of a statement. The next statement is the assignment of the result of `arc_delegitimize_address_0` to `x`." GCC,arc,441,"The next statement after `if ( ! x ) return orig_x ;` is `if ( MEM_P ( orig_x ) ) x = replace_equiv_address_nv ( orig_x , x ) ;`. The `if` statement checks if `orig_x` is a memory location, and if it is, it assigns the result of `replace_equiv_address_nv` to `x`. The `replace_equiv_address_nv` function is not defined in the code snippet you provided, so it is not possible to determine what it does. However" GCC,arc,442,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet without knowing the specific values of the variables and the context in which the code is being executed. However, based on the code snippet you provided, it appears that the next statement will be the `default` case of the `switch` statement. In the `default` case, the code will execute the `break` statement, which will cause the program to exit the `switch` statement and continue executing the code after the `switch` statement. It is important to note that the behavior of this code snippet will depend on the specific values of the variables" GCC,arc,443,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `case ARC_UNSPEC_GOTOFFPC : return XVECEXP ( op , , ) ;` This is a case statement that checks if the opcode is `ARC_UNSPEC_GOTOFFPC`. If it is, it returns the result of the `XVECEXP` function with the opcode, the first operand, and the second operand as arguments." GCC,arc,444,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return ( ( ( unsigned HOST_WIDE_INT ) low <= && high == ) || ( ( ( low & - ( unsigned HOST_WIDE_INT ) ) == - ( unsigned HOST_WIDE_INT ) ) && high == - ) ) ;` This statement is a complex conditional expression that checks if the `low` and `high` values are within certain ranges. The" GCC,arc,445,"The next statement of the code snippet is: reg = gen_rtx_REG ( SImode , ) ; This statement is assigning a new value to the variable ""reg"", which is a register in the SImode mode. The value being assigned is a register with the number , which is a constant value." GCC,arc,446,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be: `regno = REGNO ( rtl ) ;` This is because the code is checking the size of the mode of the `rtl` argument, and if it is not equal to ``, the function returns `NULL_RTX`. Otherwise, it proceeds to initialize a `PARALLEL` vector with a size of ``, which suggests that the next step will be to iterate over the registers in the parallel vector and perform some operation on them. The `regno`" GCC,arc,447,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be: `return p;` This is because the code is checking the size of the mode and generating a parallel RTX with a specific number of vectors (). It is then setting the value of a register (regno) and creating a new RTX with that register. Finally, it is returning the generated RTX." GCC,arc,448,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be a call to the `gen_rtx_MEM` function, which creates a new memory location with the specified properties. The function takes several arguments, including the mode of the memory location, the address of the memory location, and a flag indicating whether the memory location is volatile. In this case, the function is called with the following arguments: * `Pmode`: The mode of the memory location, which is the same as the mode of the `hard_frame_pointer_rtx` register. * `plus_constant (" GCC,arc,449,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be: mem = (rtx)arc_compute_frame_size(afi); This is because the function arc_compute_frame_size() is called with the argument afi, which is a pointer to a struct arc_frame_info, and the return value of the function is assigned to the variable mem, which is a pointer to an rtx." GCC,arc,450,"The next statement of the code snippet is: `SYMBOL_REF_FLAGS ( symbol ) = flags;`" GCC,arc,451,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty because it depends on the value of the variable `gmask` and the value of the constant `NUM_LIT`. However, based on the information provided, it is likely that the next statement will be `regno = ENTER_LEAVE_START_REG`. This is because the `for` loop is initialized with the value of `ENTER_LEAVE_START_REG` as the starting value of `regno`, and the loop will continue to execute as long as `gmask` is not equal" GCC,arc,452,"The code snippet you provided is a part of the Linux kernel's `arc_enter_leave_p` function, which is used to determine whether a given register is a valid entry or leave register. The next statement of the code snippet you provided is: ``` for ( regno = ENTER_LEAVE_START_REG ; regno < NUM_LIT ; regno++ ) { ``` This statement initializes a loop that iterates over the registers in the `ENTER_LEAVE_START_REG` to `NUM_LIT` range. The" GCC,arc,453,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `if (epilogue_completed && ARC_INTERRUPT_P (fn_type)) {` This is because the previous `if` statements have already been evaluated, and the code has reached the point where the `epilogue_completed` variable is being checked. If `epilogue_completed` is true and `ARC_INTERRUPT_P (fn_type)` is also true, then the code will enter the `if` block and execute the statements inside it." GCC,arc,454,"The next statement of this code snippet is: emit_insn ( gen_arc_store_exclusivesi ( mem , after ) ) ; This is because the code snippet ends with a call to emit_insn, which emits an instruction, and the argument passed to emit_insn is the result of calling gen_arc_store_exclusivesi with the arguments mem and after." GCC,arc,455,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `if ( CONST_INT_P ( op0 ) ) {` This is because the code is checking if `op0` is a constant integer, and if so, it will execute the code inside the `if` statement. If `op0` is not a constant integer, the code will skip over the `if` statement and continue executing the code after the `else` statement." GCC,arc,456,"The next statement is: emit_insn ( gen_rtx_SET ( oldvalue , gen_rtx_IOR ( SImode , oldv , val ) ) ) ; Explanation: The code snippet is part of a function that is implementing a compare-and-swap operation. The function takes several arguments, including a memory location (mem), a value to be stored (newval), and a value to be compared (oldval). The function uses the gen_rtx_SET function to generate a SET instruction that stores the value of the oldval argument in" GCC,arc,457,"The next statement is likely to be: emit_insn (gen_rtx_SET (oldv, gen_rtx_AND (SImode, oldv, mask))); This is because the previous statement is setting the value of the ""mask"" register using the AND operation, and the next statement is likely to be using the ""mask"" register in another AND operation." GCC,arc,458,"The code snippet you provided is a part of a function that appears to be generating assembly code. It is difficult to predict the exact output of the code without knowing the specific values of the variables and the context in which the code is being executed. However, based on the code snippet you provided, it appears that the function is printing out a series of assembly instructions that reference a section name. The first `fprintf` statement prints out a string literal followed by the name of the section. The second `fprintf` statement prints out a string literal followed by the name of the section. The third `fprintf` statement" GCC,arc,459,"Based on the code snippet provided, it is difficult to predict the next statement with certainty. However, based on the context and the syntax of the code, it is likely that the next statement will be another call to the `asm_fprintf` function, possibly with a different set of arguments. The `asm_fprintf` function is a custom function that is being used to write assembly code to a file. The function takes three arguments: a file handle, a format string, and a value to be written. The format string is a string literal that contains placeholders for the values to be written." GCC,arc,460,"Based on the code snippet provided, it seems that the next statement will be another call to the `asm_fprintf` function, with the same arguments as the previous call. The first argument is `asm_out_file`, which is a file pointer that represents the output file for the assembler. The second argument is a string literal that represents the format string for the `fprintf` function. The third argument is an expression that evaluates to a number, which is the value to be printed. Based on the code snippet provided, it is not possible to determine the exact value of the third" GCC,arc,461,"The next statement is: `fprintf(asm_out_file, , INSN_ADDRESSES(INSN_UID(insn)));`." GCC,arc,462,"The next statement of this code snippet is: memset ( & arc_ccfsm_current , , sizeof arc_ccfsm_current ) ; Explanation: The code snippet is part of a larger function that is responsible for printing assembly code for a target machine. The first if statement checks if the target machine has a specific flag set (TARGET_DUMPISIZE), and if so, it prints some information to the assembly code file. The second if statement checks if the current function's machine has been initialized (cfun" GCC,arc,463,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the function and the input parameters. However, based on the name of the function and the fact that it is checking whether a frame pointer is needed, it is likely that the next statement will be related to the frame pointer and its usage. Here are a few possibilities: 1. The function may check the value of a flag or variable that indicates whether the frame pointer is needed. 2. The function may check the value of a register that contains the frame pointer. 3. The function" GCC,arc,464,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `ret = const0_rtx;` This statement assigns the value `const0_rtx` to the variable `ret`." GCC,arc,465,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the values of the variables and the behavior of the functions being called. However, based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the next statement will be: `*cum = ROUND_ADVANCE_CUM(*cum, arg.mode, arg.type);` This statement updates the value of `*cum` by calling the `ROUND_ADVANCE_CUM` function with the current value of `*cum`, the `mode` field of the `arg" GCC,arc,466,The next statement after the `if ( decl )` block is `attrs = TYPE_ATTRIBUTES ( TREE_TYPE ( decl ) ) ;`. GCC,arc,467,The next statement after the `if ( decl )` block is `attrs = TYPE_ATTRIBUTES ( TREE_TYPE ( decl ) ) ;`. GCC,arc,468,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return gen_rtx_REG ( mode , ) ;` This statement returns a register of the specified mode and number, which is determined by the `NUM_LIT` macro. The `gen_rtx_REG` function is used to generate the register." GCC,arc,469,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be the assignment of the promoted mode to the `mode` variable: ``` mode = PROMOTE_MODE ( mode, unsignedp, valtype ); ``` This is because the `PROMOTE_MODE` macro is called with the `mode` variable as its first argument, and the return value of the macro is assigned to the `mode` variable. The `PROMOTE_MODE` macro is used to promote the mode of a value to a wider mode if necessary, based on the type of the value and the current mode." GCC,arc,470,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `machine_mode ccm = GET_MODE ( XEXP ( cond , ) ) ;` This line of code retrieves the machine mode of the condition code from the `cond` expression, which is a GCC RTL expression. The `GET_MODE` function is used to retrieve the mode of the expression, and the result is stored in the `ccm` variable. The `` placeholder is used to indicate that the line of code is not complete and needs to be filled in with a" GCC,arc,471,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `machine_mode ccm = GET_MODE ( XEXP ( cond , ) ) ;` This statement assigns the machine mode of the condition to the variable `ccm`. The `GET_MODE` macro is used to retrieve the mode of the expression `XEXP ( cond , )`, which is the mode of the condition. The `` placeholder is used to indicate that the mode of the condition is a literal value, rather than a variable or expression." GCC,arc,472,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific input and the behavior of the `warning` function. However, based on the code snippet you provided, it appears that the next statement will be: `* no_add_attrs = true ;` This is because the `if` statement that precedes this line checks whether the `TREE_CODE` of `arg` is not equal to `INTEGER_CST`. If this condition is true, then the `warning` function will be called with the specified arguments, and" GCC,arc,473,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `tree arg = TREE_VALUE ( args ) ;` This statement assigns the value of the `TREE_VALUE` field of the `args` structure to the `arg` variable." GCC,arc,474,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `*no_add_attrs = true;` Explanation: The code snippet is part of a function that handles attributes for a function declaration. The function takes a `tree` node as an argument, which represents the function declaration. The function checks the type of the node using the `TREE_CODE` macro, and if it is not a `FUNCTION_DECL`, it sets the `no_add_attrs` flag to `true`. This indicates that the function should not add any attributes to the function declaration." GCC,arc,475,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be the body of the `arc_handle_fndecl_attribute` function, which is defined as follows: ``` static tree arc_handle_fndecl_attribute (tree *node, tree name, tree args, int flags, bool *no_add_attrs) { // Function body } ``` The function takes five arguments: * `node`: a pointer to a `tree` structure representing the function declaration. * `name`: the name of the attribute being applied. * `" GCC,arc,476,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `warning ( OPT_Wattributes , , name ) ;` This is because the `else if` clause is executed when the `TARGET_V2` macro is not defined and the `strcmp` function returns a non-zero value, indicating that the string pointed to by `value` is not equal to the string literal ``. In this case, the `warning` function is called with the `OPT_Wattributes` option, the string literal ``," GCC,arc,477,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `error ( , name ) ;` This statement will be executed if the `DECL_P` macro evaluates to true and the `TREE_CODE` macro evaluates to a value other than `TYPE_DECL`. The `error` function will be called with the string literal `` and the `name` variable as arguments." GCC,arc,478,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be a check for the validity of the register number and mode combination. The function `arc_hard_regno_mode_ok` is likely to be checking if the given register number and mode are valid for the target architecture. Here's a possible next statement: ``` if (!arc_hard_regno_mode_ok (regno, mode)) return false; ``` This statement checks if the `arc_hard_regno_mode_ok` function returns `false`, which indicates that the register number and mode" GCC,arc,479,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return ;` This is because the `if` statement checks if the mode size is equal to `` and if the register number is within the range of ARC_FIRST_SIMD_VR_REG and ARC_LAST_SIMD_VR_REG. If both conditions are true, the function returns ``." GCC,arc,480,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return arc600_corereg_hazard ( pred , succ ) ;` This is because the `if` statement checks if `TARGET_ARC600` is true, and if it is, it returns the result of the `arc600_corereg_hazard` function with `pred` and `succ` as arguments. If `TARGET_ARC600` is false, the function returns a default value of ``." GCC,arc,481,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `if ( JUMP_P ( insn ) ) {`" GCC,arc,482,"Based on the code snippet you provided, it appears to be a part of a compiler or assembler for the ARC processor. The code is checking for various conditions and settings related to the target architecture and floating-point operations. The next statement in the code snippet is: if ( TARGET_DPFP_FAST_SET || TARGET_DPFP_COMPACT_SET || TARGET_SPFP ) && TARGET_HARD_FLOAT ) error ( ) ; This statement checks if the target architecture is set to use" GCC,arc,483,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `arc_multcost = COSTS_N_INSNS ( ) ;` This statement assigns the value of `COSTS_N_INSNS ( )` to the variable `arc_multcost`. The value of `COSTS_N_INSNS ( )` is not specified in the code snippet, so it is not possible to determine the exact value that will be assigned to `arc_multcost`." GCC,arc,484,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `emit_block_move ( tramp , assemble_trampoline_template ( ) , GEN_INT ( TRAMPOLINE_SIZE ) , BLOCK_OP_NORMAL ) ;` This statement is emitting a block move instruction to move the trampoline template into the trampoline location. The `emit_block_move` function takes four arguments: the first is the destination address, the second is the source address, the third is the size of the block to move, and the fourth is a flag indicating" GCC,arc,485,"The next statement of this code snippet is: return ; The code snippet is checking the values of the `from` and `to` variables, and based on those values, it is returning a different value. If `from` is equal to `ARG_POINTER_REGNUM` and `to` is equal to `STACK_POINTER_REGNUM`, it returns the difference between the `total_size` and `pretend_size` fields of the `frame_info` structure. If `from` is equal to `FRAME" GCC,arc,486,"The next statement of this code snippet is: arc_init_machine_status = init_machine_status ;" GCC,arc,487,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `machine->fn_type = ARC_FUNCTION_UNKNOWN;` This statement assigns the value `ARC_FUNCTION_UNKNOWN` to the `fn_type` field of the `machine_function` structure pointed to by `machine`." GCC,arc,488,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific values of the variables and the behavior of the functions being called. However, based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the next statement will be the start of a new iteration of the loop, with the value of `i` being incremented by 1. The loop is iterating over the values of the `machine_mode` enum, and for each value, it is checking the class of the mode and setting the `arc_mode_class` array accordingly. The loop will continue until all" GCC,arc,489,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `if (type == TYPE_MULTI) return cost + 1;`" GCC,arc,490,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `fprintf ( stream , ""%s%lu\n"" , prefix , labelno ) ;`" GCC,arc,491,"The next statement after the `if` block is `default_internal_label(stream, prefix, labelno)`." GCC,arc,492,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return NULL;` Explanation: The `if` statement checks if `CALL_P(insn)` is true. If it is, the function returns ``. Otherwise, it returns `NULL`. Since the `if` statement is not true in this case, the function will return `NULL`." GCC,arc,493,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `size = int_size_in_bytes (TREE_TYPE (decl));` This statement is assigning the size of the type of the variable `decl` to the variable `size`. The function `int_size_in_bytes` is used to get the size of the type in bytes." GCC,arc,494,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return false;` The code snippet is checking various conditions on the `decl` variable, and if any of them are not met, it returns `false`. The conditions being checked are: * `TREE_READONLY(decl)`: If the `decl` variable is read-only, return `false`. * `!TARGET_VOLATILE_CACHE_SET && TREE_THIS_VOLATILE(decl)`: If the `decl` variable is volatile and the `" GCC,arc,495,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `if (lookup_attribute(, attrs)) return true; return false;` This statement checks if the attribute is present in the list of attributes `attrs`. If it is present, the function returns `true`, otherwise it returns `false`." GCC,arc,496,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `if (lookup_attribute(, attrs)) return true; return false;` This statement checks if the attribute specified by `` is present in the `attrs` list. If it is, the function returns `true`, otherwise it returns `false`." GCC,arc,497,"The next statement after the given code snippet will be: `return TARGET_JLI_ALWAYS;` This is because the `if` statements are checking if the `lookup_attribute` function returns `true`, and if it does, the function will return `true`. If the `if` statements do not evaluate to `true`, the function will return `TARGET_JLI_ALWAYS`." GCC,arc,498,"The next statement after the given code snippet will be: `return TARGET_JLI_ALWAYS;` This is because the `if` statements are checking if the `lookup_attribute` function returns `true`, and if it does, the function will return `true`. If the `if` statements do not evaluate to `true`, the function will return `TARGET_JLI_ALWAYS`." GCC,arc,499,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return ( SYMBOL_REF_LONG_CALL_P ( sym_ref ) || ( TARGET_LONG_CALLS_SET && ! SYMBOL_REF_SHORT_CALL_P ( sym_ref ) && ! SYMBOL_REF_MEDIUM_CALL_P ( sym_ref ) ) ) ;` This statement is a return statement that returns a boolean value indicating whether the symbol reference is a long call or not. The return value is determined by the `SYMBOL" GCC,arc,500,"The next statement after the `if` block in the code snippet you provided is: `return false;` This statement is executed if the condition in the `if` block is not met, i.e., if the `GET_CODE` of the `sym_ref` is not equal to `SYMBOL_REF`. In this case, the function returns `false`, indicating that the `sym_ref` is not a symbol reference." GCC,arc,501,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return true;` This is because the `lookup_attribute` function is called with the `attrs` argument, which is a list of attributes for the type of the `decl` variable. If the `lookup_attribute` function finds the attribute with the name ``, it will return `true`, which will cause the `if` statement to be executed and the function to return `true`. If the `lookup_attribute` function does not find the attribute with the name ``, it will return `false" GCC,arc,502,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of the code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `TYPE_ATTRIBUTES` macro and the type of the `decl` variable. However, based on the context, it is likely that the next statement will be a check for the presence of certain attributes in the `attrs` variable. Here is a possible next statement: ``` if (attrs & TYPE_ATTRIBUTE_CONST) { // Handle the case where the type is const-qualified } ```" GCC,arc,503,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return false;` This is because the `if` statement checks if `GET_CODE ( sym_ref )` is not equal to `SYMBOL_REF`, and if it is not, it returns `false`. If the `if` statement is not executed, the next statement to be executed is the `return false;` statement." GCC,arc,504,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `if ( TREE_CODE ( addr ) == MEM_REF ) {` This is because the code is checking the type of the `addr` variable using the `TREE_CODE` macro, and if it is a `MEM_REF`, it will execute the code inside the `if` statement." GCC,arc,505,"The next statement after the given code snippet is: `attrs = TYPE_ATTRIBUTES ( TREE_TYPE ( TREE_OPERAND ( addr , ) ) ) ;` This statement retrieves the type attributes of the operand of the `addr` expression, which is a component reference. The `TYPE_ATTRIBUTES` function is used to retrieve the attributes of the type of the operand. The `TREE_OPERAND` function is used to retrieve the operand of the `addr` expression," GCC,arc,506,"The code snippet is checking if the `align_labels` variable is less than a certain value, and if the `next` variable is a valid instruction and has a recognized opcode. If both conditions are true, the function returns a value. Based on the information provided, it is difficult to predict the exact value that will be returned, as it depends on the specific values of the variables and the instruction being processed. However, we can make some general observations about the code: * The `align_labels` variable is being compared to a constant value, which suggests that it is a flag or a" GCC,arc,507,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return align_labels.levels[].log;` This is because the `if` statement checks if `align_labels.levels[].log` is less than ``, and if it is, it returns `align_labels.levels[].log`. If the `if` statement is not true, then the `return` statement is executed, which returns `align_labels.levels[" GCC,arc,508,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return false;` Explanation: The code snippet is checking various conditions to determine if an address is legitimate for a given machine mode and strictness level. If none of the conditions are met, the function returns `false`." GCC,arc,509,"The next statement in the code snippet is: `case CONST_VECTOR : switch ( mode ) { case E_V2HImode : return TARGET_PLUS_DMPY ;` This statement is a case label for the `CONST_VECTOR` case, and it switches on the value of `mode` to determine which code to execute. If `mode` is `E_V2HImode`, the code will return `TARGET_PLUS_DMPY`." GCC,arc,510,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet without knowing the values of the variables and the specific implementation of the functions being called. However, based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the code is checking the validity of an address and returning false if the address is not a valid GOT or TLS address. The code first checks if the address is a CONST_INT, and if it is not, it returns false. Then, it checks if the address is an UNSPEC with a specific number of elements (), and if it is not, it" GCC,arc,511,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `rtx x = orig_x;` This statement assigns the value of `orig_x` to a new variable `x`." GCC,arc,512,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return orig_x;` The `arc_legitimize_address_0` function is called with the `orig_x`, `oldx`, and `mode` arguments, and it returns a new value in `new_x`. If `new_x` is not null, the function returns `new_x`. Otherwise, the function returns `orig_x`." GCC,arc,513,"This code snippet is a part of the GCC compiler's code generation for the x86 architecture. It is generating code to handle the case where the address of a memory location is a constant plus a register. The code is using the `GET_MODE_SIZE` macro to get the size of the mode of the address, and then using that size to calculate the upper and lower bounds of the address. The `INTVAL` macro is used to get the integer value of the address, and the `XEXP` macro is used to get the expression that represents the address. The code" GCC,arc,514,"Based on the code snippet you provided, it appears to be part of a function that is trying to determine the address of a memory location. The function is checking the type of the address and performing different actions based on the type. The first `if` statement checks if the address is a constant, and if so, it extracts the constant value. The second `if` statement checks if the address is a sum of a constant and a register, and if so, it extracts the constant value and the register value. Based on this information, it is difficult to predict the next statement of the code" GCC,arc,515,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return addr;` This statement is executed if the `case` statement does not match any of the cases specified in the `switch` statement. In this case, the `default` case is executed, which simply returns the value of `addr`." GCC,arc,516,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `if ( GET_CODE ( x ) == PLUS && GET_CODE ( XEXP ( x , ) ) == PLUS && CONST_INT_P ( XEXP ( XEXP ( x , ) , ) ) && REG_P ( XEXP ( XEXP ( x , ) , ) ) && CONST_INT_P ( XEXP ( x , ;` This is because the `if` statement is checking whether the mode size is less than or equal to the number of units per word, and if it is, it returns the value of ``. If the mode size is greater than the number of units per word, the `if` statement will not be executed and the function will return the value of ``." GCC,arc,522,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return ( GET_MODE_CLASS ( mode1 ) == MODE_INT && GET_MODE_CLASS ( mode2 ) == MODE_INT && GET_MODE_SIZE ( mode1 ) <= UNITS_PER_WORD && GET_MODE_SIZE ( mode2 ) <= UNITS_PER_WORD ) ;` This statement is a return statement that returns a boolean value indicating whether the two modes `mode1` and `mode2` are both integer modes and their sizes are both less than or equal to the size" GCC,arc,523,"The next statement of this code snippet is: return false;" GCC,arc,524,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return false;` Explanation: The `if` statement checks the value of `func->machine->frame_info.save_return_addr`. If it is true, the function returns true. Otherwise, it returns false. Since the `if` statement is not executed, the function returns false." GCC,arc,525,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be: `next = NEXT_INSN (insn);` This is because the `NEXT_INSN` macro is used to get the next instruction in the instruction stream, and the `next` variable is used to store the result of this operation. The `NEXT_INSN` macro is typically used in conjunction with the `insn` parameter to get the next instruction in the instruction stream." GCC,arc,526,The next statement after `return true ;` would be the end of the function or method. GCC,arc,527,The next statement after `return true ;` would be the end of the function or method. GCC,arc,528,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the code depends on the specific values of the operands and the constraints of the target architecture. However, we can make some educated guesses based on the information provided. The code appears to be part of a function that is checking the operands of a machine instruction to see if they match certain criteria. The function is using the `operands_match_p` function to check if the operands match, and it is also using the `REG_P` and `CONST_INT_P` mac" GCC,arc,529,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be: `if (match2 && intval == neg_intval) { ... }` This is because the code is checking if the two operands match and if the integer value of the second operand is equal to the negative of the integer value of the first operand. If both conditions are true, then the code will execute the statements within the `if` block." GCC,arc,530,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty because it depends on the values of various variables and functions that are not provided in the code snippet. However, based on the code snippet, it appears that the next statement will be a call to the `sprintf` function with the `buf` array as the first argument and a string literal as the second argument. The string literal will depend on the value of the `flag_pic` variable, which is not provided in the code snippet. The `sprintf` function is used to format a string and store it in the `buf" GCC,arc,531,"The next statement of this code snippet is: sprintf(buf, , fname); Explanation: The code snippet is a function that takes a string argument `fname` and returns a string. The function first calculates the length of the input string using `strlen`. Then, it checks if the length is less than a certain value (which is not specified in the code snippet you provided). If the length is less than the value, the function uses `sprintf` to create a new string that is a concatenation of the input string and a string" GCC,arc,532,"The next statement of this code snippet is: fputs ( , file ) ; Explanation: The code snippet is part of a function that is printing out assembly code for a function call. The first line of the snippet uses the `asm_fprintf` function to print a string literal to the output file, followed by two registers. The second line of the snippet uses the `assemble_name` function to print the name of a function to the output file. The third line of the snippet uses the `fputs` function to print a string" GCC,arc,533,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet without knowing the values of the various variables and expressions used in the code. However, based on the structure of the code, it appears that the next statement will be a call to the `arc_output_pic_addr_const` function, which is used to output a PIC address constant. The function takes three arguments: a file, an expression, and a code. The expression is likely to be the result of simplifying the subtraction of two addresses, and the code is likely to be a constant representing the type of address being output." GCC,arc,534,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the function `arc_pass_by_reference` is not specified. However, based on the name of the function and the parameters it takes, it is likely that the function is checking whether a particular argument should be passed by reference or by value. In C++, when a function takes a parameter by reference, it means that the function can modify the original variable that was passed as an argument. When a function takes a parameter by value, it means that the function receives a copy of the original variable, and any" GCC,arc,535,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `arc_post_atomic_barrier` function and the `memmodel` parameter passed to it. However, based on the name of the function and the parameter, it is likely that the next statement will involve some kind of memory barrier or synchronization operation to ensure that memory accesses are properly ordered and consistent across multiple threads or processors." GCC,arc,536,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `emit_insn ( gen_memory_barrier ( ) ) ;` This is because the `if` statement checks whether the `need_atomic_barrier_p` function returns `true` for the given `model` and `false` arguments. If it does, then the `emit_insn` function is called with the `gen_memory_barrier` function as an argument." GCC,arc,537,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be: `ccm = GET_MODE ( XEXP ( cond , ) ) ;` This is because the code is checking the condition of the jump instruction and determining the mode of the condition code. The `GET_MODE` macro is used to retrieve the mode of the condition code, which is stored in the `cond` variable. The `XEXP` macro is used to extract the expression from the `cond` variable, and the `` placeholder is used to specify the operand" GCC,arc,538,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `if (cl == NO_REGS) return NO_REGS;` This statement checks if the `cl` argument is equal to `NO_REGS`, which is a special value that indicates that there are no registers available for the reload. If this is the case, the function returns `NO_REGS` immediately, without performing any further processing." GCC,arc,539,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be a `switch` statement that checks the value of `mode` and returns the preferred SIMD mode for that mode. Here's a possible implementation of the `arc_preferred_simd_mode` function: ``` static machine_mode arc_preferred_simd_mode ( scalar_mode mode ) { switch (mode) { case SImode: return V4SImode; case HImode: return V8HImode; case QImode:" GCC,arc,540,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `emit_insn ( gen_memory_barrier ( ) ) ;` This is because the `if` statement checks whether the `need_atomic_barrier_p` function returns `true` for the given `model` and `true` arguments. If it does, then the `emit_insn` function is called with the `gen_memory_barrier` function as an argument." GCC,arc,541,"The next statement after the `if` statement in the code snippet is the `emit_insn` function call. The `emit_insn` function is used to emit an instruction to the assembler. In this case, it is emitting the `memory_barrier` instruction. So, the next statement after the `if` statement is: ``` emit_insn ( gen_memory_barrier ( ) ) ; ```" GCC,arc,542,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `if ( output_sdata ) fputs ( , file ) ;` This is because the `if` statement is checking the value of `output_sdata`, and if it is true, it will execute the `fputs` function with the string literal `` and the `file` variable as arguments." GCC,arc,543,"The next statement is: emit_insn ( gen_rtx_SET ( destHigh , gen_rtx_UNSPEC_VOLATILE ( Pmode , gen_rtvec ( , src ) , VUNSPEC_ARC_LR_HIGH ) ) ) ;" GCC,arc,544,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `fmt = GET_RTX_FORMAT ( GET_CODE ( op ) ) ;` This line retrieves the format of the rtx code of the `op` operand, which is a `SYMBOL_REF` in this case. The format is used to determine the number of operands and their types, which is necessary to determine whether the symbolic reference is mentioned in the operands." GCC,arc,545,"The code snippet is a C function that takes an integer `r` as input and performs a series of bitwise operations on it. The function returns a boolean value indicating whether the input `r` is equal to a specific value. The first line of the function is `return ( ( ( ( r & ) ^ ) - ) & ) == r ;`, which can be broken down as follows: * `r & `: This performs a bitwise AND operation" GCC,arc,546,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `fmt = GET_RTX_FORMAT ( GET_CODE ( x ) ) ;` This line retrieves the format of the RTX (Register Transfer Expression) corresponding to the value of `x`. The format is used to determine the type of the RTX and to access its fields." GCC,arc,547,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `fmt = GET_RTX_FORMAT ( GET_CODE ( x ) ) ;` This line retrieves the format of the rtx `x` using the `GET_RTX_FORMAT` macro. The format is a string that describes the structure of the rtx, and it is used to determine how to traverse the rtx in the following lines of code." GCC,arc,548,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `if ( ! brcc_nolimm_operator ( op , VOIDmode ) && ! long_immediate_operand ( op1 , VOIDmode ) && ( TARGET_ARC700 || ( TARGET_V2 && optimize_size ) || next_active_insn ( link_insn ) != insn ) ) continue ;` This statement checks if the `brcc_nolimm_operator` function returns `true` for the `op` and `op1` oper" GCC,arc,549,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the `arc_reorg_loops` function is not specified. However, based on the name of the function, it appears to be related to loop optimization or reorganization, and it is likely that the function will modify the control flow of the program in some way. Without more information about the specific implementation of the function, it is not possible to make any further predictions about its behavior." GCC,arc,550,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `reorg_loops` function and the values of the `arc_doloop_hooks` variable. However, based on the name of the function and the variable, it is likely that the next statement will involve some kind of loop reorganization or optimization. Without more information about the specific implementation of the `reorg_loops` function and the `arc_doloop_hooks` variable, it is not possible to provide a more specific prediction of" GCC,arc,551,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be: `XVECEXP (insn, , indx++) = gen_rtx_SET (mem, reg);` This is because the code is currently iterating over the registers in the range [start_reg, end_reg], and for each register, it is generating a SET rtx that stores the register value in the corresponding memory location. The `XVECEXP` macro is used to extract the vector element at the specified index (indx) from the PARALLEL rtx" GCC,arc,552,"Based on the code snippet you provided, it appears to be a part of a function that is restoring the blink register and other registers on the stack. The code is using the `gen_rtx_REG` function to generate a register with a specific mode and number, and then using the `frame_move_inc` function to move the value from the stack to the register. The next statement of the code snippet you provided is: ``` if ( gmask ) for ( i = ; i <= GMASK_LEN ; i ++ ) { ```" GCC,arc,553,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `regno = RETURN_ADDR_REGNUM;` This is because the `else if` block is executed only if the `fn_type` is not `ARC_FUNCTION_ILINK2` and not `ARC_FUNCTION_ILINK1`. Since the `fn_type` is not `ARC_FUNCTION_ILINK2`, the first `else if` block is not executed, and the second `else if` block is executed, which sets `regno` to `RETURN" GCC,arc,554,"The next statement after the `if` statement in the code snippet you provided is: ``` return const0_rtx; ``` This statement returns the value of `const0_rtx`, which is a constant value of 0." GCC,arc,555,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return gen_rtx_MEM (VOIDmode, gen_rtx_PLUS (Pmode, frame, GEN_INT (count)));` This statement is returning a memory location that is calculated by adding the value of `count` to the address of `frame`. The `gen_rtx_MEM` function is used to create a memory location, and the `gen_rtx_PLUS` function is used to perform the addition. The `GEN_INT` function is used to create an integer constant with the" GCC,arc,556,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return ( size == - || size > ( TARGET_V2 ? : ) ) ;` This statement is a return statement that returns a boolean value indicating whether the size of the type is less than or equal to a certain value, or greater than a certain value. The value of the size is determined by the `int_size_in_bytes` function, which is called with the type as an argument. The value of the size is then compared to" GCC,arc,557,"The next statement is likely to be: XVECEXP ( insn , , indx ++ ) = gen_rtx_SET ( hard_frame_pointer_rtx , stack_pointer_rtx ) ; This is because the previous statement sets the value of the `off` variable to `off - UNITS_PER_WORD`, and the `indx` variable is incremented by 1. Therefore, the next statement is likely to be an assignment to the `XVECEXP` array, with the `indx` variable" GCC,arc,558,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `emit_insn (gen_rtx_SET (gen_rtx_REG (Pmode, RETURN_ADDR_REGNUM), gen_rtx_MEM (Pmode, plus_constant (Pmode, stack_pointer_rtx, reg_size))));` This statement is emitting an instruction to set the return address register (RETURN_ADDR_REGNUM) to the value stored in memory at the address given by the stack pointer (stack_pointer_rtx) plus the size of the" GCC,arc,559,"Based on the code snippet you provided, it appears to be a part of a function that is saving registers to the stack frame. The code is checking the value of the `gmask` variable and based on that, it is deciding whether to save certain registers to the stack frame or not. The next statement of the code snippet you provided is: ``` if ( ( gmask & ( << i ) ) == ) continue ; ``` This statement is checking if the `gmask` variable has a certain bit set at the position specified by" GCC,arc,560,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of the code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the values of the variables and the specific implementation of the `for` loop. However, based on the information provided, it is likely that the next statement will be: `machine_mode save_mode = SImode;` This is because the `for` loop is iterating over the elements of the `gmask` array, and the next element to be processed is the one with index `i = GMASK_LEN - 1`. The `machine_mode` variable `save_" GCC,arc,561,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be: `return cfun -> machine -> arc_reorg_started;` This statement returns the value of the `arc_reorg_started` field of the `machine` structure of the current function (`cfun`). The `arc_reorg_started` field is likely to be a boolean value indicating whether the ARC reorganization has started or not." GCC,arc,562,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return priority + ;` This is because the `if` statement checks whether `set` is not null and whether the mode of the source operand of `set` is `DFmode`. If both conditions are true, the code inside the `if` statement is executed, which returns the value of `priority` plus some literal value ``. If either of the conditions is false, the code inside the `if` statement is not executed, and the function returns the value of `priority` without" GCC,arc,563,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return priority + ;` This statement is executed if the following conditions are true: * `set` is not null * `GET_MODE(SET_SRC(set))` is equal to `DFmode` * `GET_CODE(SET_SRC(set))` is equal to `REG` If these conditions are true, the function returns the value of `priority` plus some constant value ``." GCC,arc,564,"The next statement after the `switch` block in the code snippet you provided is the `break` statement. The `break` statement is used to exit the `switch` block and continue execution with the next statement after the `switch` block. In this case, there is no next statement after the `switch` block, so the program will terminate. So, the next statement after the `switch` block in this code snippet is the end of the program." GCC,arc,565,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `sri->icode = in_p ? CODE_FOR_reload_qi_load : CODE_FOR_reload_qi_store;` This is because the code is checking the value of `mode` and setting the `icode` field of the `sri` structure accordingly. If `mode` is `E_QImode`, the code sets `sri->icode` to `CODE_FOR_reload_qi_load` if `in_p` is true, and `CODE_FOR_reload_qi_store" GCC,arc,566,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be: `gcc_assert ( GET_CODE ( addr ) == REG ) ;` This is because the `XEXP` function is used to extract the expression that is being stored in the memory location pointed to by `mem`. The `GET_CODE` function is then used to check the type of the expression, and in this case, it is expected to be a register." GCC,arc,567,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `emit_move_insn ( scratch , addr ) ;` This statement is emitting a move instruction to move the value stored in `addr` into the register `scratch`." GCC,arc,568,"The next statement of this code snippet is: case GT : case UNLE : return CC_Zmode ;" GCC,arc,569,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return arc_attr_type(insn) == TYPE_COMPARE;` This is because the `if` statement that checks the value of `NONJUMP_INSN_P(insn)` is true, and the `if` statement that checks the value of `dyn_cast(PATTERN(insn))` is also true. Therefore, the code inside the `if` statement is executed, which sets `insn` to the last instruction in the sequence, and then" GCC,arc,570,"The code snippet you provided is part of a function that is generating RTL (Register Transfer Language) code for a function call. The function takes a number of arguments, and the code is responsible for setting up the stack frame for the function call. The code you provided is checking if the first anonymous argument is a function argument register (FUNCTION_ARG_REGNO_P). If it is, then it sets up the first register offset for the argument. If the argument is not a register, then it generates a MEM rtx for the argument. Based on the information provided, it is" GCC,arc,571,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return offset >= - && offset <= ;` This statement is executed if the value of `get_arc_condition_code(comparison)` is either `ARC_CC_EQ` or `ARC_CC_NE`. The statement checks if the value of `offset` is within the range of `- ` and ``. If the value of `offset` is within this range, the statement returns `true`, otherwise it returns `false`." GCC,arc,572,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be a conditional statement that checks the value of the `is_short` variable. The `arc_verify_short` function is used to verify that the instruction is a short instruction, and the `- ` argument is used to specify the number of literal values that should be checked. Therefore, the next statement is likely to be a conditional statement that checks the value of `is_short` and performs a different action depending on whether the instruction is short or not. For example: ``` if (is_short) {" GCC,arc,573,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific input values and the implementation of the `arc_short_long` function. However, based on the function name and the parameters, it is likely that the function is used to generate a short or long form of a string based on the input values. Here are a few possible next statements: 1. `const char * short_form = arc_short_long(insn, s_tmpl, l_tmpl);` 2. `const char * long_form = arc_" GCC,arc,574,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the `arc_spill_class` function is dependent on the specific implementation of the function and the inputs provided to it. However, based on the name of the function and the parameters it takes, it is likely that the function is used to determine the spill class of a register, which is a class of registers that can be used to store data temporarily while it is being processed. The function may take into account the type of data being processed, the available registers, and other factors to determine the appropriate" GCC,arc,575,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be the end of the function, as it is returning a value." GCC,arc,576,"The next statement is likely to be an `emit_insn` call, as the code is emitting a sequence of instructions to perform an atomic operation. The specific instruction that will be emitted depends on the target architecture and the specific atomic operation being performed." GCC,arc,577,"Based on the code snippet provided, it appears to be a part of a switch statement in a programming language. The switch statement is checking the value of a variable `mask` and performing different actions based on its value. The next statement in the code snippet is `case :`, which indicates that the switch statement is checking the value of `mask` against a specific value, which is represented by ``. The code inside the `case` block will be executed if the value of `mask` matches the value specified in the `case` statement. Without" GCC,arc,578,"The code snippet you provided is a part of a function that is generating instructions for the GNU Compiler Collection (GCC). The function appears to be generating instructions for a loop that is iterating over a set of values. The code snippet you provided is incomplete, so it's difficult to determine exactly what the next statement will be. However, based on the context, it's likely that the next statement will be another iteration of the loop, with the variable `i` being incremented by 1. Here's a breakdown of the code snippet you provided: * The first line" GCC,arc,579,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `shimm = (ival * + ) & ;` This statement is part of the second `if` statement, which checks if `ival` is a power of 2 plus a constant. If this is the case, the code generates a rotate instruction to shift the bits of `ival` by a constant amount. The `shimm` variable is used to store the result of the rotation, which is then used as the second operand of the `SET` instruction." GCC,arc,580,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `in_set = single_set ( consumer ) ;`" GCC,arc,581,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `if ( ! MEM_P ( in_addr ) ) return false ;` This statement checks if the `in_addr` is not a memory address, and if it's not, it returns `false`." GCC,arc,582,"The next statement of the code snippet is: `return false;` Explanation: The `if` statement checks if the target architecture is ARC700 and the tune is not ARC_TUNE_ARC7XX. If this condition is true, the function returns `true`. Otherwise, it returns `false`. In this case, the function is called with `producer` and `consumer` arguments, but the `if` statement is not executed because the condition is not met. Therefore, the function returns `false`." GCC,arc,583,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the `arc_symbol_binds_local_p` function is not specified. However, based on the name of the function and the context in which it is being called, it is likely that the function returns a boolean value indicating whether the symbol represented by the `x` parameter binds to a local variable." GCC,arc,584,"The `next_nonnote_insn` function returns the next instruction in the instruction stream that is not a note. Therefore, the next statement of this code snippet will be the instruction that is next in the instruction stream after the `label` instruction." GCC,arc,585,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be a `gcc_assert` statement, which is a macro provided by the GNU Compiler Collection (GCC) that is used to check for certain conditions at compile-time. The `gcc_assert` macro takes a single argument, which is the condition to be checked. In this case, the condition is that the `GET_CODE` macro, which returns the type of the given expression, should return either `CODE_LABEL` or `NOTE`. The `NOTE` type is used to represent a note, which is a type of instruction" GCC,arc,586,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `arc_toggle_unalign` function. However, based on the name of the function, it is likely that it is used to toggle the alignment of an arc or a curve. Without more information about the context in which this code is being used, it is difficult to provide a more specific prediction. If you have any additional details or context, I would be happy to try and provide a more accurate prediction." GCC,arc,587,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `arc_toggle_unalign` function. However, based on the name of the function, it is likely that it is used to toggle the alignment of an arc or a curve. Without more information about the context in which this code is being used, it is difficult to provide a more specific prediction. If you have any additional details or context, I would be happy to try and provide a more accurate prediction." GCC,arc,588,"The next statement after the `for` loop will be the assignment of the null character (`\0`) to the last character of the lowercase string. So, the next statement will be: ``` * lo = '\0'; ```" GCC,arc,589,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `note = find_reg_note (branch, REG_BR_PROB, );` This line of code is searching for a register note with the specified branch probability and filling it with the value ." GCC,arc,590,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `note = find_reg_note (branch, REG_BR_PROB, );` This line of code is searching for a register note with the specified branch probability and filling it with the value ." GCC,arc,591,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return gen_rtx_CONST ( Pmode , gen_rtx_UNSPEC ( Pmode , gen_rtvec ( , loc ) , unspec ) ) ;` This statement is returning a `CONST` expression with a `UNSPEC` operand. The `UNSPEC` operand is a vector of `NUM_LIT` elements, where each element is a `loc` expression. The `unspec` parameter is used to specify the type of `U" GCC,arc,592,"The next statement after the `if` block is the `return` statement. The `if` block checks the value of `flag_pic` and `SYMBOL_REF_SMALL_P(symbol)`. If either of these conditions is true, the function returns `false`. If both conditions are false, the function returns the result of the `default_use_anchors_for_symbol_p` function, which is called with the `symbol` argument." GCC,arc,593,"The next statement after the `if` statement would be the `return` statement, which returns `false` if the `op` variable is equal to `MOVE_BY_PIECES`." GCC,arc,594,"The next statement after the `if` statement will be the `return` statement. The `if` statement checks whether the `op` variable is equal to `MOVE_BY_PIECES`. If it is, the function returns `false`. If it is not, the function returns the result of the `default_use_by_pieces_infrastructure_p` function, which is a boolean value. Therefore, the next statement after the `if` statement will be the `return` statement, which returns the result of the `default_use_by_pieces" GCC,arc,595,The next statement after the `case E_V2SImode : return TARGET_PLUS_QMACW ;` statement is `case E_V4SImode :`. GCC,arc,596,"The next statement in the code snippet is: case E_V4SImode :" GCC,arc,597,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `iscompact = get_attr_iscompact (insn);` This line of code assigns the value of the `iscompact` attribute of the `insn` instruction to the `iscompact` variable. The `get_attr_iscompact` function is used to retrieve the value of the `iscompact` attribute from the `insn` instruction." GCC,arc,598,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be a check for the return type of the function `decl`. The `tree` type is a data structure used to represent the syntax tree of a program in the GNU Compiler Collection (GCC), and the `decl` parameter is a pointer to a `tree` node representing the function declaration. The `arc_warn_func_return` function is likely to be a warning function that checks for certain conditions in the return type of the function, such as whether the return type is a pointer or a reference, and whether the function returns a value that is not" GCC,arc,599,"The next statement in this code snippet is likely to be a case statement or a series of case statements that handle different types of codes returned by the GET_CODE() function. The purpose of this code is to iterate over the subexpressions of an instruction (represented by the ""insn"" variable) and perform some action based on the type of each subexpression. The specific action taken will depend on the type of code returned by GET_CODE() for each subexpression." GCC,arc,600,"The code snippet is a C-like language, and it appears to be manipulating a data structure representing a conditional expression. The `GET_CODE` function is checking the type of the `dest` object, and if it is an `IF_THEN_ELSE` expression, it is modifying the `dest` object by setting it to a new value based on the result of a comparison. The comparison is checking whether the value of `XEXP ( dest , XEXP ( dest , ) == pc_rtx` is equal to `pc_rtx`." GCC,arc,601,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be: `dest_uid = get_uid ( dest ) ;` This is because the code is checking the `GET_CODE` of `dest` and if it is `IF_THEN_ELSE`, it is extracting the condition and the two branches of the `IF_THEN_ELSE` expression using `XEXP`. If the condition is equal to `pc_rtx`, it is returning the first branch, otherwise it is returning the second branch. The next statement is likely to be an assignment to `" GCC,arc,602,"The next statement after the `default` label is the `error` function call. The `error` function takes two string literals as arguments, which are not specified in the code snippet you provided. Therefore, the next statement after the `default` label is the `error` function call with two string literals as arguments." GCC,arc,603,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the program depends on the specific inputs and the implementation of the `pass_arc_ifcvt` class. However, based on the name of the class and the fact that it is being instantiated and returned, it is likely that the next statement will be a call to a method of the `pass_arc_ifcvt` class, such as `run` or `execute`." GCC,arc,604,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `align = get_symbol_alignment ( addr ) ;` This line of code calculates the alignment of the symbol `addr` and stores it in the variable `align`. The `get_symbol_alignment` function is used to retrieve the alignment of the symbol, which is then used to determine whether the address is legitimate for the given mode." GCC,arc,605,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `if ( RTX_FRAME_RELATED_P ( insn ) ) {` This is because the `if` statement on line 3 is checking the value of the `RTX_FRAME_RELATED_P` macro, which is a predicate that checks whether the `insn` is a frame-related instruction. If the `insn` is frame-related, then the `if` statement will be executed, and the next statement will be the opening brace of the `if` block" GCC,arc,606,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be the call to the `simplify_gen_subreg` function, which is a GCC built-in function that simplifies a subreg operation. The function takes several arguments, including the mode of the input and output operands, the input operand, and the endianness of the target machine. In this case, the function is being called with the `SImode` and `DImode` modes, which indicate that the input operand is a 32-bit integer and the output operand is a 64" GCC,arc,607,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `rtx disi_highpart ( rtx in ) {` This line is a function declaration, which defines a function named `disi_highpart` that takes a single argument of type `rtx` and returns a value of type `rtx`. The function is not yet defined, so the next statement would be the function body, which would contain the instructions that make up the function's implementation." GCC,arc,608,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `emit_insn (gen_rtx_fmt_ee (code, op0, op1, op2));`" GCC,arc,609,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be: `emit_insn (pat);` This is because the `pat` variable is being set to the result of a call to either `gen_shift_si3` or `gen_shift_si3_loop`, depending on the value of the `shift4_operator` function, and then the `emit_insn` function is being called with `pat` as its argument. The `emit_insn` function is responsible for emitting the instruction represented by the `pat` variable." GCC,arc,610,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `add_reg_br_prob_note` function and the `jump` and `profile_probability` variables. However, based on the name of the function and the parameters passed to it, it is likely that the function is adding a branch probability note to the `jump` instruction with a very unlikely probability. Here is a possible next statement: ``` jump.set_probability(profile_probability.very_unlikely()); ``` This" GCC,arc,611,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `add_reg_br_prob_note` function and the `jump` and `profile_probability` variables. However, based on the name of the function and the parameters passed to it, it is likely that the function is adding a branch probability note to the `jump` instruction with a very unlikely probability. Here is a possible next statement: ``` jump.set_probability(profile_probability.very_unlikely()); ``` This" GCC,arc,612,"The next statement after `return arc_predicate_delay_insns ( ) ;` is likely to be the end of the function, as the `return` statement is typically used to return a value from a function and exit the function. Therefore, the next statement after `return arc_predicate_delay_insns ( ) ;` is likely to be the end of the function, and the program control will return to the caller of the function." GCC,arc,613,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return arc_predicate_delay_insns();` This statement returns the value of the `arc_predicate_delay_insns()` function, which is a virtual function that is defined in the `function` class. The `arc_predicate_delay_insns()` function is not defined in the code snippet you provided, so it is not possible to determine what it does or what value it returns." GCC,arc,614,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the program depends on the specific values of the variables and the implementation of the functions being called. However, based on the code snippet provided, it is possible to make some educated guesses about what the next statement might be. The `XEXP` macro is used to extract the expression from a `rtx` object. The first argument to `XEXP` is the `rtx` object to be extracted from, and the second argument is the index of the expression to be extracted." GCC,arc,615,"The next statement after the `if` block is the `for` loop. The loop will iterate from `reg` to `reg + nregs - 1`, and for each iteration, it will call the `SET_HARD_REG_BIT` macro with the `overrideregs` array and the current value of `j` as arguments." GCC,arc,616,"The next statement after the `gcc_assert` line is the `if` statement. The `gcc_assert` macro is used to check that the `offset` variable is a valid offset into the GCC data structures. If the `offset` is not a valid offset, the `gcc_assert` macro will abort the program with an error message. The `if` statement checks whether the `offset` is zero. If it is, the function returns `NULL_RTX`. Otherwise, the function continues executing the next statement." GCC,arc,617,"The next statement after the `gcc_assert` statement is: `if ( ! offset ) return NULL_RTX ;` This statement checks if the `offset` variable is zero, and if so, returns `NULL_RTX`. If the `offset` variable is not zero, the function continues to the next statement." GCC,arc,618,"The next statement of this code snippet is: return x;" GCC,arc,619,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be a comparison or assignment operation involving the value of `tmp` and the value of `RTX_FRAME_RELATED_P(tmp)`. Without knowing the specific values of `tmp` and `RTX_FRAME_RELATED_P(tmp)`, it is difficult to predict the exact next statement. However, based on the syntax and the fact that `RTX_FRAME_RELATED_P` is a macro that returns a boolean value, it is likely that the next statement will be" GCC,arc,620,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return insn;` The `if` statement checks if the `addr` is null or if the `GET_CODE` of `addr` is `PRE_DEC`, `POST_INC`, `PRE_MODIFY`, or `POST_MODIFY`. If any of these conditions are true, the `add_reg_note` function is called with the `insn` and `REG_INC` arguments. After that, the `return` statement is executed, which returns the `insn` value." GCC,arc,621,"The next statement is: insn = frame_move_inc ( reg , addr , stack_pointer_rtx , ) ; This is a function call to frame_move_inc, which moves a value from a register to a memory location, incrementing the register by the size of the value. The function takes four arguments: the register to move from, the memory location to move to, the stack pointer register, and a literal value representing the size of the value to move. The function returns a new instruction that represents the move operation." GCC,arc,622,"The next statement of this code snippet is: insn = frame_move_inc ( reg , addr , stack_pointer_rtx , ) ; This statement is a function call to the function ""frame_move_inc"", which is used to move a register value to a memory location. The function takes four arguments: the register to be moved, the memory location to move to, the stack pointer register, and a literal value. The function returns a new instruction that represents the move operation. The next statement after this would be: add_reg_" GCC,arc,623,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `addr = gen_frame_mem ( GET_MODE ( reg ) , gen_rtx_PRE_DEC ( Pmode , stack_pointer_rtx ) ) ;` This statement is executed if the `else` branch is taken, which means that the `if` condition is false. In this case, the `addr` variable is assigned the result of `gen_frame_mem`, which is a function that generates a memory reference expression. The first argument to `gen_frame_mem` is the mode of the memory reference," GCC,arc,624,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `addr = gen_frame_mem ( GET_MODE ( reg ) , gen_rtx_PRE_DEC ( Pmode , stack_pointer_rtx ) ) ;` This statement is executed when the `offset` variable is equal to 0, which means that the `plus_constant` function is not called, and the `addr` variable is set to the result of `gen_frame_mem` with the `PRE_DEC` modifier." GCC,arc,625,"The next statement after `return frame_add ( stack_pointer_rtx , offset ) ;` is likely to be the next line of code in the function that calls `frame_add`. Without knowing the specifics of the code, it's difficult to provide a more specific answer. However, based on the name of the function `frame_add`, it's likely that the next statement will be related to adding a new frame to the stack." GCC,arc,626,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be the initialization of a new variable `rtx` with the value returned by the function `frame_stack_add`. Here's the updated code snippet with the next statement added: ``` static rtx frame_stack_add ( HOST_WIDE_INT offset ) { rtx new_rtx = frame_stack_add ( offset ); return new_rtx; } ``` In this code snippet, the function `frame_stack_add` takes a single argument `offset` of type `HOST" GCC,arc,627,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the `gate` function depends on the specific implementation of the `function` class and the value of the `flag_delayed_branch` variable. However, based on the name of the function and the variable, it is likely that the `gate` function is used to control the flow of the program based on the value of the `flag_delayed_branch` variable. The `gate` function may be returning `true` or `false` based on the value of this variable, which could be" GCC,arc,628,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the `gate` function is not specified. However, based on the syntax and the fact that the function is declared as `virtual`, it is likely that the next statement will be a call to the `gate` function with a pointer to a function as an argument. Here is an example of what the next statement might look like: ``` gate(some_function); ``` This would call the `gate` function with the address of the `some_function` function as an argument. The `" GCC,arc,629,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the code is dependent on the specific inputs and environment in which it is executed. However, based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the function `gen_acc1` is intended to generate a random number between 0 and 1. The function uses the `rand` function from the C standard library to generate a random number, and then scales the result by multiplying it by 100. Therefore, the next statement of this code snippet would likely be the return statement, which" GCC,arc,630,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be a return statement, as the code snippet is using the `return` keyword. The `return` statement is used to return a value from a function. In this case, the function is returning a value of type `rtx`, which is a type used to represent a register or a memory location. The value being returned is a register, as indicated by the `REG` keyword. The `SImode` parameter is used to specify the size of the register. In this case, it is set to `SImode`, which means that the" GCC,arc,631,"The next statement of this code snippet is: return gen_rtx_REG ( SImode , TARGET_BIG_ENDIAN ? : ) ; This statement returns a register operand with the specified mode (SImode) and the specified number (). The number is determined by the value of the TARGET_BIG_ENDIAN macro, which is either 0 or 1. If TARGET_BIG_ENDIAN is 0, the number is" GCC,arc,632,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific values of the variables and the behavior of the `gcc_assert` function. However, based on the code snippet, it appears that the next statement will be a comparison of the values of `offsets[]` and `offsets[]`. If the values are equal, the function will return `false`. If the values are not equal, the function will continue executing and potentially swap the values of `operands[]` and `" GCC,arc,633,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be the initialization of the `base` variable with the value of `cur_base` if the current iteration is the first one (i.e., `i == `). Here's a breakdown of the code snippet: 1. `rtx cur_base , cur_offset , tmp ;`: Declares three variables of type `rtx`: `cur_base`, `cur_offset`, and `tmp`. 2. `rtx base = NULL_RTX ;`: Initializes the `base`" GCC,arc,634,"The next statement of this code snippet is: case E_CC_FP_GTmode : if ( TARGET_ARGONAUT_SET && TARGET_SPFP ) switch ( GET_CODE ( comparison ) ) { case GT : return ARC_CC_N ; case UNLE : return ARC_CC_P ; default : gcc_unreachable ( ) ; } else switch ( GET_CODE ( comparison ) ) { case GT : return ARC_CC_HI ; case UNLE : return ARC_CC_LS ; default : gcc_unreach" GCC,arc,635,The next statement after the `switch` block is `if ( decl ) align = DECL_ALIGN ( decl ) ;`. GCC,arc,636,"Based on the code snippet you provided, it appears that the next statement after the `case PLUS :` line would be: `return get_symbol_alignment ( XEXP ( x , ) ) ;` This is because the `case PLUS :` line is followed by a `return` statement, which means that the code will exit the `switch` block and return the result of the `get_symbol_alignment` function. The `XEXP` macro is used to extract the first operand of the `PLUS` expression, which" GCC,arc,637,"The code snippet you provided is part of the GCC compiler's loop optimization pass. It is generating code for a loop that is being optimized. The code is emitting a jump instruction that will jump back to the start of the loop if the loop's iteration variable is not equal to 0. The jump instruction is being emitted before the loop's end label, which is represented by the `loop->loop_end` variable. The `test` variable is being set to a new `rtx` value that represents the comparison of the loop's iteration variable with 0. The" GCC,arc,638,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `emit_insn_before (seq, BB_HEAD (loop->head));` This statement emits the sequence `seq` before the head of the basic block `loop->head`. The sequence `seq` contains the instructions for the loop, including the loop prologue and epilogue." GCC,arc,639,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `reg = SET_DEST ( XVECEXP ( PATTERN ( insn ) , , ) ) ;` This statement sets the value of the `reg` variable to the destination register of the instruction. The `SET_DEST` macro is used to extract the destination register from the instruction's pattern. The `XVECEXP` macro is used to extract the nth element of the instruction's pattern, where n is specified by the ` , ) ) ;` This statement is assigning the destination register of the instruction to the `reg` variable. The `SET_DEST` macro is used to extract the destination register from the instruction's pattern, and the `XVECEXP` macro is used to extract the desired element from the pattern. The `` placeholders represent the indices of" GCC,arc,641,"The next statement in the code snippet is: `xreg = decode_reg_name ( str ) ;` This line of code is assigning the result of the `decode_reg_name` function, which takes the string `str` as an argument, to the variable `xreg`. The `decode_reg_name` function is not shown in the code snippet, so it is not possible to determine what it does or what value it will return." GCC,arc,642,"Based on the code snippet you provided, it appears to be a part of a function that parses a string and extracts certain information from it. The function appears to be checking if the string contains a specific substring, and if it does, it performs some action based on the substring. Without more context, it's difficult to provide a more specific answer. Can you provide more information about the code snippet, such as the function it's from and what it's supposed to do?" GCC,arc,643,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `if (GET_CODE (pat) == COND_EXEC) pat = COND_EXEC_CODE (pat);` This statement checks if the pattern of the instruction is a conditional execution pattern (i.e., a pattern that specifies a condition under which the instruction should be executed). If it is, the `COND_EXEC_CODE` macro is used to extract the condition code from the pattern." GCC,arc,644,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet without knowing the specific values of the variables and the behavior of the functions being called. However, based on the code snippet, it appears that the code is iterating over a list of instructions and performing some operations on each instruction. The code snippet is using the `CALL_P` macro to check if the current instruction is a call instruction, and if it is not, it continues to the next instruction. If the current instruction is a call instruction, it retrieves the pattern of the instruction using the `PATTERN` macro. If" GCC,arc,645,"Based on the code snippet provided, it appears to be a function that checks whether a given expression `x` is a valid base or index for an addressing mode. The function takes several parameters, including `strict`, which is a boolean value that determines whether the check should be strict or not. The function first checks if the expression `x` is a `PLUS` expression, and if not, returns `false`. Then, it checks if the first operand of `x` is a valid base or index, using the `RTX_OK_FOR_BASE_P` and `RT" GCC,arc,646,"The code snippet you provided is a part of a function that appears to be checking the validity of a machine instruction. The function is using a series of `if` statements to check different conditions, and it is returning `true` or `false` based on the outcome of these checks. The next statement of the code snippet you provided is: ``` if ( RTX_OK_FOR_BASE_P ( XEXP ( op , ) , ( strict ) ) ) return true ; ``` This statement is checking if the result of the `RTX_OK" GCC,arc,647,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be the creation of a new instance of the `rtl_opt_pass` class, using the `make_pass_arc_ifcvt` function. The function takes a `gcc::context` object as an argument, which is used to create the new instance. Here is an example of how the code might continue: ``` rtl_opt_pass *pass = make_pass_arc_ifcvt(ctxt); ``` This code creates a new instance of the `rtl_opt_pass` class, using" GCC,arc,648,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be the return statement, which returns a pointer to a newly created `pass_arc_predicate_delay_insns` object. The `pass_arc_predicate_delay_insns` object is a subclass of `rtl_opt_pass`, which is a class used for optimizing RTL (Register Transfer Language) code in the GCC compiler. The `make_pass_arc_predicate_delay_insns` function is a factory function that creates and returns a new `pass_arc_predicate_delay_insns`" GCC,arc,649,"The next statement of this code snippet is: * offset = const0_rtx; Explanation: The code snippet is checking if the memory operand is legitimate for the addressing mode of the instruction. If the memory operand is not legitimate, the function returns false. The first step in this check is to set the offset to 0, which is done by assigning const0_rtx to *offset." GCC,arc,650,"The next statement of the code snippet is: `return NULL;` This is because the `if` statement checks if `insn` is equal to `` or if `NOTE_P ( insn )` is false. If either of these conditions is true, the `break` statement is executed, which exits the loop. If both conditions are false, the `if` statement is skipped and the `return NULL;` statement is executed." GCC,arc,651,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `insn = NEXT_INSN ( insn ) ;` This statement assigns the next instruction in the sequence to the variable `insn`." GCC,arc,652,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be: `t = GET_MODE_SIZE ( DImode ) - ;` This is because the `if` statement checks the condition `SMALL_INT_RANGE ( offset , ( GET_MODE_SIZE ( DImode ) - ) & ( ~ ) , ( offset & ( GET_MODE_SIZE ( DImode ) - ) & ? :" GCC,arc,653,"The code snippet you provided is a C-like language, and it appears to be part of a function that is checking if a given offset is within a certain range. The function is returning `false` if the offset is not within the range, and it is assigning a value to the variable `t` if the offset is within the range. The next statement of the code snippet you provided would be: ``` t = REGNO ( rt ) ; ``` This statement is assigning the value of the `REGNO` macro, which is a function that returns the register number of a given register" GCC,arc,654,"Based on the code snippet you provided, it appears to be a part of a function that generates assembly code for a shift operation. The function takes a number of bits to shift, a destination register, and a code for the type of shift (e.g. ASHIFT, ASHIFTRT, LSHIFTRT). The function first checks if the number of bits to shift is equal to the number of bits in a word minus a certain number (which is not specified in the code snippet). If this is the case, and the destination register is a valid register operand, then the function" GCC,arc,655,"Based on the code snippet you provided, it is difficult to predict the next statement with certainty. However, based on the context and the fact that the code is checking for a short instruction and verifying its alignment, it is likely that the next statement will be related to handling a short instruction. Here are a few possibilities: 1. The next statement could be a call to a function that handles short instructions, such as `arc_handle_short_insn()`. 2. The next statement could be a check for a specific type of short instruction, such as a load or store instruction. 3" GCC,arc,656,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be: `fprintf (file, ""short suffix"");`. This is because the code is checking if the current instruction (`insn`) is a short suffix instruction, and if it is, it is printing the string ""short suffix"" to the file. The `` placeholder is likely a constant value that represents the number of literal operands in the instruction." GCC,arc,657,"The code snippet you provided is part of a function that appears to be generating assembly code for a processor. The function is using a number of variables and functions that are not defined in the code snippet you provided, so it is difficult to determine exactly what the next statement will be. However, based on the context of the code, it appears that the next statement will be a case statement that checks the value of the ""offset"" variable. The case statement will likely contain a number of different cases, each of which will generate a different sequence of assembly code instructions. Without more information about the specific processor and the" GCC,arc,658,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be an error message or a call to a function that handles the error. The code is parsing a command-line option that specifies a banked register, and it is using the `strtol` function to convert the option value to a long integer. The `errno` variable is set to a specific value if there is an error during the conversion, and the code is checking the value of `errno` to determine if there was an error. If there was an error, the code will print an error message or call a function that handles the error." GCC,arc,659,"The next statement in the code snippet is: `pass_data_arc_ifcvt ( ctxt ) ;` This statement is calling the `pass_data_arc_ifcvt` function, which is a member function of the `rtl_opt_pass` class. The `pass_data_arc_ifcvt` function is not defined in the code snippet, so it is not possible to determine what it does. However, based on the name of the function, it is likely that it is related to the optimization of the RTL code for the ARC instruction set" GCC,arc,660,"The next statement in the code snippet is: `pass_data_arc_ifcvt ( ctxt ) ;` This statement is calling the `pass_data_arc_ifcvt` function, which is a member function of the `rtl_opt_pass` class. The `pass_data_arc_ifcvt` function is not defined in the code snippet, so it is not possible to determine what it does. However, based on the name of the function, it is likely that it is related to the optimization of the RTL code for the ARC instruction set" GCC,arc,661,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `pass_arc_predicate_delay_insns ( ctxt )` This is a call to the `pass_arc_predicate_delay_insns` function, which is a member function of the `rtl_opt_pass` class. The function takes a `context` object as its argument, which is the `ctxt` object that was passed to the constructor of the `rtl_opt_pass` class. The `pass_arc_predicate_delay_insns` function is not defined in" GCC,arc,662,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `pass_arc_predicate_delay_insns ( ctxt )` This is a call to the `pass_arc_predicate_delay_insns` function, which is a member function of the `rtl_opt_pass` class. The function takes a `context` object as its argument, which is the `ctxt` object that was passed to the constructor of the `rtl_opt_pass` class. The `pass_arc_predicate_delay_insns` function is not defined in" GCC,arc,663,"The next statement is likely to be: RTX_FRAME_RELATED_P (insn) = 1; Explanation: The code snippet is creating a new instruction (insn) that moves a register (reg) to a memory location (stkslot). The instruction is marked as frame-related (RTX_FRAME_RELATED_P) with a value of . The add_reg_note function is then called to add a note to the instruction, which specifies that the stack pointer (stack" GCC,arc,664,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `if ( MEM_P ( operands [ ] ) ) tmp = gen_reg_rtx ( mode ) ;` This statement checks if the operand at index `` is a memory operand, and if so, it generates a new register with the same mode as the operand. The register is stored in the variable `tmp`." GCC,arc,665,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `operands[] = gen_rtx_PLUS(SImode, operands[], operands[]);`" GCC,arc,666,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be a call to the `gen_rtx_PLUS` function, which generates a new `rtx` object representing the sum of two other `rtx` objects. The function takes three arguments: the mode of the result, the first operand, and the second operand. In this case, the mode is `SImode`, which is a 32-bit signed integer mode. The first operand is `operands[]`, which is a reference to the `NUM_LIT`th element" GCC,arc,667,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `operands[] = gen_rtx_MINUS(SImode, operands[], operands[]);`" GCC,arc,668,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific values of the variables and the behavior of the functions being called. However, based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the next statement will be: `return true;` This is because the `if` statement that is currently being executed has a condition that is always true, and the `else if` statement that follows it has a condition that is also always true. Therefore, the `return true;` statement will be executed, and the function will return `true`." GCC,arc,669,"Based on the code snippet you provided, it appears to be a function that returns a string representation of the architecture of a CPU. The function takes a `arc_selected_cpu` parameter, which is a structure that contains information about the CPU's architecture. The function starts by checking the `arch_id` field of the `arc_selected_cpu` structure to determine which type of architecture the CPU has. It then uses a series of `if` statements to check the `flags` field of the `arc_selected_cpu` structure to determine which specific features the CPU has. Based" GCC,arc,670,"This code snippet is a loop that iterates over a list of function pointers, starting from the end of the list and moving backwards. The loop calls each function in turn, passing no arguments. The next statement of this code snippet would be the call to the function pointed to by `p`. Since `p` is a pointer to a function, the expression `*p` evaluates to the function itself, and the expression `(*p)()` calls the function with no arguments." GCC,arc,671,"The next statement of this code snippet is: ( * p ) ( ) ; Explanation: The code snippet is a function named `__do_global_ctors` that is responsible for calling the global constructors of a C++ program. The function takes no arguments and returns no value. The function first declares a pointer `p` of type `func_ptr`, which is a pointer to a function that takes no arguments and returns no value. The function then initializes `p` to point to the last element of the array `__CTOR_END__`, which" GCC,arc,672,"This code snippet is a loop that iterates over a list of destructors, calling each one in turn. The loop starts at the address of the first destructor in the list, which is stored in the `__DTOR_LIST__` symbol, and increments the pointer `p` by `` bytes after each iteration. The loop continues until the end of the list is reached, which is indicated by a null pointer. The next statement in the loop would be to call the destructor function at the address pointed to by `p`. This would be done by dereferencing the pointer `" GCC,arc,673,"This code snippet is a loop that iterates over a list of destructors, calling each one in turn. The loop starts at the address of the first destructor in the list, which is stored in the `__DTOR_LIST__` symbol, and increments the pointer `p` by `` bytes after each iteration. The loop continues until the end of the list is reached, which is indicated by a null pointer. The next statement in the loop would be to call the destructor function at the address pointed to by `p`. This would be done by dereferencing the pointer `" GCC,arc,674,"The next statement of this code snippet is: ( * p ) ( ) ; This statement calls the function pointer stored in the variable p, which is a pointer to a function that takes no arguments and returns void. The function is called with no arguments, and its return value is discarded. The loop continues until the pointer p points to the beginning of the array of function pointers, which is indicated by the symbol __CTOR_END__. At this point, the loop terminates and the function __do_global_ctors returns." GCC,arc,675,"The next statement of this code snippet is: p = malloc(sizeof(func_ptr));" GCC,arc,676,"The next statement of this code snippet is: p = malloc(sizeof(func_ptr));" LLVM,NVPTX,0,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `CallToOld->eraseFromParent();` This statement removes the old call instruction from its parent basic block." LLVM,NVPTX,1,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `NewFunc -> setName(Func -> getName() + );` This statement sets the name of the new function `NewFunc` to the name of the original function `Func` with a suffix added to it. The suffix is represented by ``, which is a placeholder for a string literal." LLVM,NVPTX,2,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return NvvmEntryPointMetadata;` Explanation: The code snippet defines a lambda function `HasUseOtherThanLLVMUsed` that takes a `GlobalValue*` parameter and returns a boolean value indicating whether the global value has any uses other than the LLVM IR. The lambda function is then used in a loop that iterates over the operands of a metadata node. For each operand, the code checks whether it is a metadata string with a specific value, and if so, it casts the operand to a `" LLVM,NVPTX,3,The next statement after `return ;` would be the end of the function. LLVM,NVPTX,4,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `GlobalOffset ( ) : ModulePass ( ID ) {` This is a constructor for the `GlobalOffset` class, which inherits from the `ModulePass` class. The constructor takes an `ID` parameter, which is used to initialize the `ID` field of the `GlobalOffset` object." LLVM,NVPTX,5,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `GlobalOffset ( ) : ModulePass ( ID ) {` This is a constructor for the `GlobalOffset` class, which inherits from the `ModulePass` class. The constructor takes an `ID` parameter, which is used to initialize the `ID` field of the `GlobalOffset` object." LLVM,NVPTX,6,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be: `Builder.CreateStore(Builder.getInt32(0), ImplicitOffset);` This statement is creating a new store instruction using the `CreateStore` method of the `IRBuilder` class, and storing the value `0` (represented by the `getInt32(0)` method) in the `ImplicitOffset` variable. The `ImplicitOffset` variable is a pointer to an `AllocaInst` object, which is a type of instruction that allocates memory on the stack. The `Create" LLVM,NVPTX,7,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be: `EntryPointMetadata = getEntryPointMetadata(M);` This is because the code snippet ends with a call to `assert`, which is a debugging function that checks a condition and prints an error message if the condition is not met. The condition in this case is a complex expression that involves the `ImplicitOffsetIntrinsic` variable, which is likely to be a function or method that returns a value of type `ImplicitOffsetPtrType`. The `getEntryPointMetadata` function is likely to be a function that returns metadata about" LLVM,NVPTX,8,"The next statement after the `if` statement is: `const MDOperand & FuncOperand = MetadataNode -> getOperand ( ) ;` This line retrieves the operand at index `` from the `MetadataNode` object and assigns it to the `FuncOperand` variable." LLVM,NVPTX,9,"The next statement of this code snippet is: return ""MyPass"";" LLVM,NVPTX,10,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `LocalAccessorToSharedMemory ( ) : ModulePass ( ID ) {` This is the constructor of the `LocalAccessorToSharedMemory` class, which is a subclass of `ModulePass`. The constructor initializes the `ID` field of the `ModulePass` class with the value of the `ID` parameter passed to the constructor." LLVM,NVPTX,11,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `LocalAccessorToSharedMemory ( ) : ModulePass ( ID ) {` This is the constructor of the `LocalAccessorToSharedMemory` class, which is a subclass of `ModulePass`. The constructor initializes the `ID` field of the `ModulePass` class with the value of the `ID` parameter passed to the constructor." LLVM,NVPTX,12,"The next statement after the code snippet you provided is: `Changed = true;` This is because the `if` statement that follows the `continue` statement is only executed if the `NewFunc` variable is not null. If `NewFunc` is null, then the `continue` statement is executed, which means that the `Changed` variable is not modified. Therefore, the next statement after the code snippet you provided is `Changed = true;`, which sets the `Changed` variable to true." LLVM,NVPTX,13,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `Changed = true;` Explanation: The code snippet is part of a loop that iterates over the operands of a metadata node. For each operand, it checks if it is a constant metadata node, and if so, it casts it to a `ConstantAsMetadata` object. If the cast succeeds, it then checks if the constant is a function, and if so, it calls the `ProcessFunction` method on it. If the method returns a non-null value, it sets the `Changed` flag to `" LLVM,NVPTX,14,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the code depends on the specific values stored in the `Pool` vector and the value of `NUM_LIT`. However, based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the `Current` iterator is being used to iterate over the elements of the `Pool` vector, and the loop will continue until the `Current` iterator reaches the end of the vector. Within the loop, the code is using the `std::string` class to store and manipulate strings. The `std::string`" LLVM,NVPTX,15,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `delete *Current;` This statement deletes the object pointed to by `Current`, which is the current element in the pool. The `++Current` statement is then executed, which increments the `Current` pointer to point to the next element in the pool. The loop continues until `Current` points to the end of the pool." LLVM,NVPTX,16,"The next statement after the code snippet you provided is: *Str = S; This statement assigns the value of S to the string pointed to by Str." LLVM,NVPTX,17,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the `ManagedStringPool` class is not specified. However, based on the name of the class and the fact that it is a constructor, it is likely that the next statement will be a call to the superclass constructor, if there is one. Alternatively, it may be a call to an initialization method or a block of code that sets up the object's internal state. Without more information about the class and its implementation, it is not possible to provide a more specific answer." LLVM,NVPTX,18,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the `ManagedStringPool` class is not specified. However, based on the name of the class and the fact that it is a constructor, it is likely that the next statement will be a call to the superclass constructor, if there is one. Alternatively, it may be a call to an initialization method or a block of code that sets up the object's internal state. Without more information about the class and its implementation, it is not possible to provide a more specific answer." LLVM,NVPTX,19,"The next statement after the `switch` block is `llvm_unreachable()` which is a function call to the `llvm_unreachable` function with a string literal as an argument. The `llvm_unreachable` function is a built-in function in LLVM that is used to indicate that a particular code path is unreachable. It is typically used in situations where the compiler can prove that a certain branch of code is never taken, and it is used to avoid generating unnecessary code. In this case, the" LLVM,NVPTX,20,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be the initialization of the `SmVersion` member variable of the `NVVMIntrRangePass` class. In the constructor of the `NVVMIntrRangePass` class, the `SmVersion` member variable is being initialized with the value passed to the constructor. This is done using the `SmVersion` parameter, which is passed by value. Therefore, the next statement of this code snippet is likely to be the initialization of the `SmVersion` member variable, which is done using the `SmVersion` parameter passed to the" LLVM,NVPTX,21,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be the initialization of the `SmVersion` member variable of the `NVVMIntrRangePass` class. In the constructor of the `NVVMIntrRangePass` class, the `SmVersion` member variable is being initialized with the value passed to the constructor. This is done using the `SmVersion` parameter, which is passed by value. Therefore, the next statement of this code snippet is likely to be the initialization of the `SmVersion` member variable, which is done using the `SmVersion` parameter passed to the" LLVM,NVPTX,22,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `NVVMReflectPass::NVVMReflectPass(unsigned SmVersion) : SmVersion(SmVersion) {` This is the constructor of the `NVVMReflectPass` class, which takes an `unsigned` parameter `SmVersion` and initializes the `SmVersion` member variable with the same value." LLVM,NVPTX,23,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `NVVMReflectPass::NVVMReflectPass(unsigned SmVersion) : SmVersion(SmVersion) {` This is the constructor of the `NVVMReflectPass` class, which takes an `unsigned` parameter `SmVersion` and initializes the `SmVersion` member variable with the same value." LLVM,NVPTX,24,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet without knowing the context in which it is being used. However, based on the syntax and the fact that the `AllocaHoisting` class is being instantiated, it is likely that the next statement will be a method call on the `AllocaHoisting` object. For example, the next statement might be: ``` return new AllocaHoisting().hoistAllocas(); ``` This would call the `hoistAllocas()` method on the `AllocaHoisting` object" LLVM,NVPTX,25,"The next statement after the code snippet you provided is likely to be a call to the `addPreserved` function, which is a member function of the `StackProtector` class. The `addPreserved` function is used to add a new entry to the `StackProtector` object's list of preserved values. Here is an example of what the next statement might look like: ``` StackProtector::addPreserved(some_value); ``` In this example, `some_value` is a placeholder for the actual value that you want to add to the `" LLVM,NVPTX,26,"The next statement after the code snippet you provided is likely to be a call to the `addPreserved` function, which is a member function of the `StackProtector` class. The `addPreserved` function is used to add a new entry to the `StackProtector` object's list of preserved values. Here is an example of what the next statement might look like: ``` StackProtector::addPreserved(some_value); ``` In this example, `some_value` is a placeholder for the actual value that you want to add to the `" LLVM,NVPTX,27,The next statement after `return ;` would be the end of the function. LLVM,NVPTX,28,"The next statement after the code snippet you provided is likely to be a call to the `addRequired` method of the `AU` object, passing in a `DataLayout` object as an argument. Here's the code snippet with the next statement added: ``` AU . addRequired < DataLayout > ( ) ; AU . addPreserved < MachineFunctionAnalysis > ( ) ; AU . addRequired < DataLayout > ( ) ; ``` Note that the `addRequired` method is called twice in a row, which is not typical. It's possible that the code is" LLVM,NVPTX,29,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the program depends on the specific implementation of the `getPassName` method and the state of the object. However, based on the name of the method and the fact that it is declared as `const`, it is likely that the method returns a string that represents the name of the pass. The `const` keyword indicates that the method does not modify the state of the object, so it is possible that the method returns a constant string or a string that is stored in the object. Without more information" LLVM,NVPTX,30,The next statement after `return ;` would be the end of the function. LLVM,NVPTX,31,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `++BI;` Explanation: The inner `for` loop is iterating over the basic blocks in the function, and the current basic block is represented by the variable `I`. The variable `BI` is the current instruction in the basic block, and it is being incremented at the end of each iteration of the inner `for` loop. The next statement of the code snippet is therefore the increment of `BI`, which is done using the prefix increment operator `++`. This will move the instruction pointer to the next instruction in the" LLVM,NVPTX,32,"The next statement in the code snippet is: `AU.addRequired();` This statement adds the `DataLayoutPass` to the list of required passes for the analysis." LLVM,NVPTX,33,"Based on the code snippet you provided, it is difficult to predict the next statement with certainty. However, based on the context and the patterns we see in the code, it is likely that the next statement will be related to the handling of the `allocaInst` variable. Here are some possible next statements: 1. `functionModified = true;` 2. `firstTerminatorInst = (I++)->getTerminator();` 3. `I = function.begin();` 4. `E = function.end();` 5. `I = E;` Th" LLVM,NVPTX,34,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be a call to the `addPreserved` method of the `MachineFunctionAnalysis` class, passing in the `AU` object as an argument. The purpose of this method is to add the `AU` object to the list of preserved objects in the `MachineFunctionAnalysis` object." LLVM,NVPTX,35,"The next statement after the code snippet you provided is likely to be a call to the `addPreserved` method of the `AU` object, passing in the `MachineFunctionAnalysis` class as an argument. Here's the full code snippet with the next statement added: ``` AU . addRequired < DataLayoutPass > ( ) ; AU . addPreserved < MachineFunctionAnalysis > ( ) ; AU . addPreserved < MachineFunctionAnalysis > ( ) ; ``` In this code, the `addPreserved` method is called on the `AU` object," LLVM,NVPTX,36,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `AU.addRequired();` This line of code adds the `TargetData` class as a required analysis for the current pass. The `addRequired` method is called on the `AnalysisUsage` object `AU`, and it takes a template parameter of the type of analysis to be added. In this case, the type is `TargetData`." LLVM,NVPTX,37,"The next statement of this code snippet is: AU.setPreservesAll();" LLVM,NVPTX,38,"The next statement in the code snippet is: `AU.addPreserved( );`" LLVM,NVPTX,39,"The next statement in this code snippet is: `return AllocaHoisting ( );` This statement is a return statement that returns the result of the `AllocaHoisting` function, which is a `FunctionPass` object. The `ID` parameter is not used in this statement, so it can be ignored." LLVM,NVPTX,40,"The next statement in this code snippet is: `return AllocaHoisting ( );` This statement is a return statement that returns the result of the `AllocaHoisting` function, which is a `FunctionPass` object. The `ID` parameter is not used in this statement, so it can be ignored." LLVM,NVPTX,41,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `double double64 = ( double ) CFP -> getValueAPF ( ) . convertToDouble ( ) ;`" LLVM,NVPTX,42,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `f = oneFunc;` This is because the code checks the value of `flag` and if it is `false`, it returns `false`. If `flag` is `true`, it assigns `oneFunc` to `f`." LLVM,NVPTX,43,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `for (i = ; i < n; i++) global_list.insert(global_list.end(), gv_array[i]);` This is the final statement of the `for` loop that was started on the previous line. The loop variable `i` is incremented, and the loop continues until `i` is equal to `n`. Inside the loop, the `global_list` is modified by inserting elements from the `gv_array` at the end of the list." LLVM,NVPTX,44,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `i = 0;` Explanation: The code snippet is part of a function that is finalizing the global variables of a module. The function first emits the globals, then it creates an array of global variable pointers and populates it with the global variables from the module. The function then removes all the global variables from the module and inserts them back in the same order as they were in the array. The next statement of the code snippet is `i = 0;`, which initializes the loop counter `i`" LLVM,NVPTX,45,"The next statement in the code snippet is: `OutStreamer.AddBlankLine();`" LLVM,NVPTX,46,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `printReturnValStr` and `emitFunctionParamList` functions, as well as the values of the `F` and `O` variables. However, based on the names of the functions and the context of the code snippet, it is likely that the next statement will be related to printing or emitting the return value of the function `F` to the output stream `O`. The `printReturnValStr` function is likely to be responsible for printing the return value of the function" LLVM,NVPTX,47,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `printReturnValStr` function and the `Mang` class. However, based on the syntax and the fact that the `Mang` class appears to be a class for mangling symbols, it is likely that the next statement will be a call to the `getSymbol` method of the `Mang` class, which will return a string representation of the symbol. Therefore, the next statement of this code snippet is likely to be: `O << Mang->get" LLVM,NVPTX,48,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `emitDeclaration(F, O);` Explanation: The code snippet is part of a function that is emitting declarations for a function `F` and an object `O`. The function is using a `continue` statement to skip over certain parts of the code, but the next statement that will be executed is `emitDeclaration(F, O);`." LLVM,NVPTX,49,"The next statement of this code snippet is: O << << thePointerTy . getSizeInBits ( ) << ;" LLVM,NVPTX,50,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `Inst.setLoc(MI->getLoc());` This statement sets the location of the `MCInst` object to the location of the `MachineInstr` object that was passed to the `EmitInstruction` function. The `setLoc` method is used to set the location of the `MCInst` object, and the `getLoc` method is used to get the location of the `MachineInstr` object." LLVM,NVPTX,51,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `StringRef fileName(Scope.getFilename());` This statement creates a new `StringRef` object called `fileName` and initializes it with the result of the `getFilename()` method called on the `Scope` object." LLVM,NVPTX,52,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `FullPathName += sys::path::get_separator(ctx);` This statement appends the directory separator character to the `FullPathName` string, which is used to build the full path of the file. The `sys::path::get_separator(ctx)` function returns the directory separator character for the current platform, which is then appended to the `FullPathName` string." LLVM,NVPTX,53,The next statement after the `if` statement is `msg.append();`. LLVM,NVPTX,54,"Based on the code snippet you provided, it appears to be generating a string representation of a data type. The code is using a combination of string literals and function calls to build up the string representation. The next statement in the code snippet is: `O << getPTXFundamentalTypeStr(ETy); O << ; O << *Mang->getSymbol(GVar); return;` This statement is calling the `getPTXFundamentalTypeStr` function with the `ETy` parameter, and then appending the result to the `O" LLVM,NVPTX,55,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the `getVirtualRegisterName` function is not specified. However, based on the name of the function and the parameters it takes, it is likely that the function returns a string representing the name of a virtual register. The `vr` parameter is likely to be a reference to a virtual register, and the `isVec` parameter is likely to be a boolean value indicating whether the virtual register is a vector register. The `O` parameter is not clear from the code snippet, but it is likely to be an" LLVM,NVPTX,56,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `emitVirtualRegister` method and the values of the variables involved. However, based on the name of the method and the parameters it takes, it is likely that the next statement will be related to emitting a virtual register to the output stream `O`. Some possible next statements could include: * `O << ""vr"" << vr;` to emit the virtual register number `vr` to the output stream `O`. * `O << ""v"" << isVec;` to" LLVM,NVPTX,57,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `const FunctionType * FTy = dyn_cast < FunctionType > ( Ty ) ;` This line is checking if the type `Ty` is a function type, and if so, it casts it to a `FunctionType` pointer and assigns it to `FTy`." LLVM,NVPTX,58,"Based on the code snippet you provided, it appears to be a switch statement that is handling different types of data. The next statement after the `IntegerTyID` case would be the `FloatTyID` case. Therefore, the next statement of this code snippet would be: ``` case Type :: FloatTyID : return ; ``` It's important to note that the `` and `` placeholders are used to represent literal values that are not specified in the code snippet you provided." LLVM,NVPTX,59,"The next statement after the `if` statement will be the `return` statement, which will return the `reader` object." LLVM,NVPTX,60,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return reader;`" LLVM,NVPTX,61,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return MCOperand::CreateExpr(Expr);` This statement is returning the result of the `MCOperand::CreateExpr` function, which creates a new `MCOperand` object from the `Expr` object. The `Expr` object is a `MCSymbolRefExpr` object that was created on the previous line of the code snippet." LLVM,NVPTX,62,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be the creation of a new `MCExpr` object using the `Create` method, passing in the `Expr` object as the first argument and the `MCSymbolRefExpr::VK_None` value as the second argument. The `OutContext` object is also passed as a third argument. Here is an example of what the next statement might look like: ``` MCExpr *Expr = MCExpr::Create(Expr, MCSymbolRefExpr::VK_None, OutContext); ``` This statement creates a new `MC" LLVM,NVPTX,63,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the values of the variables `VRegMapping`, `RC`, `vr`, `isVec`, and the contents of the string literal. However, based on the code snippet, it appears that the next statement will be a call to the `report_fatal_error` function, passing in the string literal as an argument. This is because the code checks if `isVec` is false, and if so, it reports a fatal error. Therefore, the next statement of this code snippet is likely" LLVM,NVPTX,64,"Based on the code snippet provided, it appears to be related to the LLVM compiler infrastructure. The code is creating a machine operand for a specific type of operand, such as an immediate value or a symbol reference. The next statement is likely to be a case statement for another type of operand, such as a register or a memory location. The code will likely use a similar pattern of creating a machine operand for the specific type of operand, using the appropriate LLVM classes and methods." LLVM,NVPTX,65,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be: `MI -> getOperand ( i )` This is because the loop is iterating over the operands of a machine instruction, and `MI -> getOperand ( i )` is the method used to retrieve the operand at index `i` in the instruction." LLVM,NVPTX,66,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific values of the variables and the implementation of the `getNumOperands` and `getOperand` methods. However, based on the code snippet, it appears that the next statement is likely to be a call to the `getOperand` method, passing in the current value of `i` as an argument. This would retrieve the next operand from the machine instruction and store it in the `MO` variable." LLVM,NVPTX,67,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `O << << llvm::getSamplerName(*GVar) << ;` This statement is part of the `if` block that checks if the global variable `GVar` is a sampler. If it is, the code will print the name of the sampler using the `llvm::getSamplerName` function, and then print some additional text using the `<<` operator." LLVM,NVPTX,68,"This code snippet is a C++ function that takes a string argument `argName` and prints it to the output stream `O`. The function iterates over the characters of the string and prints them to the output stream, except for the period (`.`) character, which is replaced with the string literal ``. Therefore, the next statement of this code snippet would be: ``` O << * p; ``` This statement prints the current character of the string to the output stream." LLVM,NVPTX,69,"The next statement of this code snippet is: O << ; return ; Explanation: The code snippet is part of a function called `printScalarConstant` that takes two arguments: a constant pointer `CPV` and a raw output stream `O`. The function checks if the constant is an integer, a floating-point number, or a null pointer, and prints the value accordingly. If the constant is an integer, it calls the `getValue` method to get the value and prints it to the output stream. If the constant is a floating-point" LLVM,NVPTX,70,"Based on the code snippet provided, it is difficult to predict the next statement with certainty. However, based on the context and the patterns in the code, it is likely that the next statement will be another `if` statement or a call to a function. The code appears to be using the `dyn_cast` function to cast a `CPV` object to a `ConstantInt`, `ConstantFP`, `ConstantPointerNull`, `GlobalValue`, or `ConstantExpr` object. If the cast is successful, the code will execute a different block of code depending on the type of" LLVM,NVPTX,71,"The next statement of the code snippet is: `StringRef Filename(SP.getFilename());` This line of code retrieves the filename of the current subprogram being processed, and stores it in the `Filename` variable." LLVM,NVPTX,72,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `const Constant * C = dyn_cast < Constant > ( * ui ) ;` This line is inside the loop, and it is executed for each use of the constant `C` in the loop. The `dyn_cast` function is used to cast the use of `C` to a `Constant` pointer, which is then stored in the variable `C`. The `const` keyword is used to indicate that the `C` variable is a constant pointer, and the `*` operator is used to dereference the pointer and get the" LLVM,NVPTX,73,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `if (const MDNode * md = dyn_cast(U)) {` This line is checking if the `U` object is a `MDNode` object, and if it is, it casts it to a `MDNode` object and assigns it to the `md` variable." LLVM,NVPTX,74,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `if ( !caller ) continue;` Explanation: The code snippet is checking if the current instruction `I` is a function call, and if so, it checks if the function being called is in the `seenMap`. If the function is not in the `seenMap`, it returns `true`. Otherwise, it continues to the next instruction. In the current state of the code, `I` is a function call, and `caller` is the function being called. The code is checking if `caller` is" LLVM,NVPTX,75,"The next statement after `delete reader;` is likely to be the end of the code snippet or the start of a new statement. The `delete` operator is used to free the memory allocated to an object, and it is typically followed by a semicolon to indicate the end of the statement. In this case, the `reader` object is being deleted, which means that the memory allocated to it is being freed. It's important to note that the `delete` operator should only be used on objects that were created with the `new` operator, and that it should be used in the same" LLVM,NVPTX,76,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the implementation of the `AsmPrinter` class and the specific input being processed. However, based on the code snippet provided, it is likely that the next statement will be a call to the `print` method of the `AsmPrinter` class, which will print the assembly code generated by the `AsmReader` class to the console." LLVM,NVPTX,77,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be the continuation of the `for` loop, which will increment the `pos` variable and check if it is less than the `size` of the buffer. If it is, the loop will continue to the next iteration, which will perform the same operations as the previous iteration, but with the updated `pos` value. The specific operations that will be performed in the next iteration will depend on the values of the variables and the contents of the buffer. However, it is likely that the code will continue to read the buffer and print out the contents of the buffer" LLVM,NVPTX,78,"Based on the code snippet provided, it is difficult to predict the next statement with certainty. However, based on the context and the information provided, it is likely that the next statement will be related to the handling of the symbol table and the printing of the symbol names. The code snippet appears to be part of a function that is responsible for printing the symbol table of an object file. The function takes a buffer as input and iterates over the buffer to print the symbol names and their corresponding values. The `numSymbols` variable is used to keep track of the number of symbols in the buffer, and the `" LLVM,NVPTX,79,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `emitDeclaration(F, O);` Explanation: The code snippet is part of a loop that iterates over the instructions in a basic block. The loop checks if the current instruction is a call instruction, and if it is, it gets the parent basic block and the parent function of the instruction. If the function has already been seen before, the loop continues to the next instruction. If the function has not been seen before, the loop emits a declaration for the function and breaks out of the loop. Therefore, the next" LLVM,NVPTX,80,"The next statement after the `assert` statement is the `for` loop. The loop will iterate over the elements of the `Globals` vector, starting from the `NUM_LIT` index, and print each element using the `printModuleLevelGV` function, followed by a newline character." LLVM,NVPTX,81,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it appears to be part of a larger function and the context is not provided. However, based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the next statement will be a case statement for the MachineOperand::MO_Register enum value. The code snippet is part of a function that appears to be responsible for printing operands for a machine instruction. The function takes a MachineOperand object as an argument and uses a series of case statements to determine the type of operand and print it accordingly. The case statements cover different types of oper" LLVM,NVPTX,82,"The next statement of the code snippet is: `if (const ConstantDataSequential * CDS = dyn_cast(CPV)) {` This line checks if the `CPV` object can be dynamically cast to a `ConstantDataSequential` object, and if so, it assigns the result to the `CDS` pointer. If the cast is successful, the code inside the `if` block will be executed." LLVM,NVPTX,83,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty because the behavior of the code depends on the specific values of the variables and the output of the functions called. However, based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the next statement will be: `Bytes = TD->getTypeSizeInBits(CPV->getType()) / 8;` This is because the code is checking the type of `CPV` and calling the `getType()` method on it to get the type of the constant. It is then calling the `getTypeSizeInBits" LLVM,NVPTX,84,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `llvm_unreachable();` This statement is part of the `default` case of the `switch` statement, which means that the code will only be executed if the `TypeID` of the `CPV` constant is not one of the cases handled by the previous `if` and `else if` statements. The `llvm_unreachable` function is a built-in function in LLVM that is used to indicate that a particular code path is unreachable. It" LLVM,NVPTX,85,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific inputs and the behavior of the functions called. However, based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the next statement will be: `global_list.remove(global_list.begin());` This is because the `while` loop will continue to execute as long as `global_list` is not empty, and the `remove` function is called on the first element of `global_list` each time the loop iterates." LLVM,NVPTX,86,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `OutStreamer.EmitRawText(OS2.str());` This statement is emitting the raw text of the output stream `OS2` to the output streamer `OutStreamer`. The `EmitRawText` method is called on the `OutStreamer` object, and the `str` method is called on the `OS2` object to get the raw text to be emitted." LLVM,NVPTX,87,"The next statement after the `if` block is `printReturnValStr(F, O)`." LLVM,NVPTX,88,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the `emitLinkageDirective` function is not specified. However, based on the name of the function, it is likely that it is responsible for emitting a linkage directive for the function `F` with the given options `O`. Therefore, the next statement of this code snippet is likely to be a call to the `emitLinkageDirective` function with the appropriate arguments, followed by any necessary cleanup or bookkeeping code." LLVM,NVPTX,89,"Based on the code snippet provided, it is difficult to predict the next statement with certainty. However, based on the context and the patterns in the code, it is likely that the next statement will be another iteration of the loop, with the iterator `iter` being incremented and the loop condition being checked again. The code snippet appears to be part of a function that is iterating over the uses of a function `F` and checking if any of the uses are a constant that is used in a global variable definition or if the use has already been seen. If the use is a constant and it is used in" LLVM,NVPTX,90,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `for (unsigned i = 0, e = gvars.size(); i != e; ++i) {` This is a for loop that iterates over the elements of the `gvars` vector. The loop variable `i` is initialized to 0, and the loop continues until `i` is equal to the size of the `gvars` vector. Inside the loop, the `printModuleLevelGV` function is called with the `i`th element of `gvars` as an argument." LLVM,NVPTX,91,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `std::vector` class and the `GlobalVariable` class, as well as the contents of the `localDecls` vector. However, based on the code snippet provided, it is likely that the next statement will be a loop that iterates over the `gvars` vector and performs some operation on each `GlobalVariable` object. The loop will likely use the `std::vector` class's `begin()` and `end()` methods to iterate over the vector, and" LLVM,NVPTX,92,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `OutStreamer.EmitRawText(StringRef(""AsmPrinter::EmitFunctionBodyEnd""));` This statement is emitting a raw text string to the output streamer, which is likely a file or a buffer. The string being emitted is the name of the function being printed, which is ""AsmPrinter::EmitFunctionBodyEnd"". The `` and `` are placeholders for the ISA and string literals, respectively." LLVM,NVPTX,93,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `OutStreamer` class and the `setAndEmitFunctionVirtualRegisters` function. However, based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the next statement will be a call to the `emitRawText` method of the `OutStreamer` class, passing in a string reference to the string literal ``." LLVM,NVPTX,94,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `O << ;` This is because the `if` statement checks if `llvm::isKernelFunction(*F)` is true, and if it is, it executes the first branch of the `if` statement, which is `O << ;`. If `llvm::isKernelFunction(*F)` is false, it executes the second branch of the `if` statement, which is `O << ; printReturnValStr(*MF, O);`." LLVM,NVPTX,95,"Based on the code snippet you provided, it appears to be generating a string based on various parameters. It's difficult to predict the exact output without knowing the values of the variables and the specific implementation of the `nvptxSubtarget` class. However, based on the code snippet, it seems like the output will be a string that includes the following: * A string literal based on the `nvptxSubtarget` class's `getDrvInterface` method * A string literal based on the `nvptxSubtarget` class's `hasDouble` method *" LLVM,NVPTX,96,"Based on the code snippet you provided, it appears to be generating a string based on the values of various variables and constants. Here's a possible next statement: O << ; This statement is likely to be a concatenation of the string literal """" with the current value of the variable ""O"", which is likely to be a string. The resulting string will be the next value of ""O""." LLVM,NVPTX,97,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `printInstruction` function and the `OutStreamer` class. However, based on the code provided, it is likely that the next statement will be: `OutStreamer.EmitRawText(OS.str());` This statement will emit the raw text representation of the `OS` object to the output stream." LLVM,NVPTX,98,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `printInstruction(MI, OS);` Explanation: The code snippet is a part of a function named `AsmPrinter::EmitInstruction`, which is responsible for emitting instructions to the output stream `OS`. The function takes a `MachineInstr` pointer `MI` as an argument. The first statement of the function is to create a `SmallString` object `Str` with a size of ``. This is likely used to store the instruction being emitted. The" LLVM,NVPTX,99,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be: `if (llvm::getReqNTIDz(F, reqntidz) == false) reqntidz = ; else specified = true;` This statement is checking if the `reqntidz` variable has been specified in the function `F`. If it has not been specified, it is set to a default value of ``. If it has been specified, the `specified` variable is set to `true`." LLVM,NVPTX,100,"This code snippet is a part of a larger program that is generating LLVM IR code. The code is using the `sys` module to append a file name to the system path, and then it is checking if the file name is already in the filename map. If it is not, it is adding the file name to the map and emitting some raw text to the output streamer. Based on the code snippet, the next statement is likely to be: `filenameMap[fileName.str()] = curLoc.getLine();` This line of code is adding the current line number to" LLVM,NVPTX,101,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be: `msg.append();` This is because the previous statement `msg.append(V->getName().str());` is an if-statement, and the next statement after an if-statement is typically the else-statement or the next statement after the if-statement. In this case, the next statement is `msg.append();`, which is the else-statement." LLVM,NVPTX,102,"Based on the code snippet you provided, it appears to be a part of a larger program that is generating assembly code. The code is using the `switch` statement to check the type of a variable `ETy` and then performing different actions based on the type. The next statement of the code snippet you provided is: ``` O << << * Mang -> getSymbol ( GVar ) << ; ``` This statement is using the `<<` operator to concatenate several strings together. The first string is ``, which" LLVM,NVPTX,103,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it appears to be part of a larger program and the context is not provided. However, based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the next statement may be related to the manipulation of a data structure or the generation of a string representation of a type. The code snippet defines several variables, including `TD`, `PTy`, `ETy`, and `ElementSize`, which are likely to be used in the next statement. The variable `TD` is a pointer to a `DataLayout` object, which is a class" LLVM,NVPTX,104,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `temp << ;` This statement appends the string literal `` to the `temp` stringstream object." LLVM,NVPTX,105,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `alignStruct = alignStruct + align;` This statement is located after the `if (align > alignStruct)` condition, and it updates the value of `alignStruct` to be the maximum of `alignStruct` and `align`. The purpose of this statement is to keep track of the maximum alignment of all the elements in the structure." LLVM,NVPTX,106,"The next statement of this code snippet is: return reader;" LLVM,NVPTX,107,"Based on the code snippet you provided, it appears to be a part of a function that is generating a string representation of a register class. The function takes a register class (RC) as input and generates a string representation of the register class based on its size and other properties. The code snippet you provided appears to be checking the size of the register class (RC) and generating a string representation of the register class based on its size. If the size of the register class is equal to a certain value (NUM_LIT), the function generates a string representation of the register class using a specific format. If the size" LLVM,NVPTX,108,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet as it appears to be incomplete. The snippet is a switch statement with multiple cases, but it is not clear what the statement is trying to accomplish or what the next case is. Without more context, it is difficult to provide a meaningful answer. If you could provide more information about the code snippet or the problem you are trying to solve, I would be happy to try and assist you further." LLVM,NVPTX,109,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet because it appears to be incomplete or contains syntax errors. The `case` keyword is used to specify a branch of code to execute based on the value of a switch expression, but it is not clear what the switch expression is or what the branches should be. Additionally, there are many `case` statements with no corresponding code, which is not valid syntax. Without more information, it is not possible to provide a definitive answer to what the next statement of this code snippet should be. However, it is likely that the code snippet is intended to be part" LLVM,NVPTX,110,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return MCBinaryExpr::CreateAdd(LHS, RHS, Ctx);` This is because the `switch` statement is checking the opcode of the `ConstantExpr` object `CE`, and the `case` statement for `Instruction::Add` is the next one to be executed. The `CreateAdd` function is called with the `LHS` and `RHS` expressions as arguments, and the `Ctx` object is also passed as an argument. The `CreateAdd` function creates a new `MCBinaryExpr`" LLVM,NVPTX,111,"The next statement in the code snippet is: O << ']' ; Explanation: The code snippet is a part of a function called PrintAsmMemoryOperand, which is responsible for printing a memory operand in assembly code. The function takes several parameters, including a pointer to a machine instruction (MI), the operand number (OpNo), and a raw output stream (O). The function first checks if the ExtraCode parameter is non-null and if the character at position in the ExtraCode string is non-zero. If" LLVM,NVPTX,112,"The next statement in the code snippet is: O << ']' ; Explanation: The code snippet is a part of a function called PrintAsmMemoryOperand, which is responsible for printing a memory operand in assembly code. The function takes several parameters, including a pointer to a machine instruction (MI), the operand number (OpNo), and a raw output stream (O). The function first checks if the ExtraCode parameter is non-null and if the character at position in the ExtraCode string is non-zero. If" LLVM,NVPTX,113,"The next statement of this code snippet is: numHex = 10; Explanation: The code snippet is part of a function called `printFPConstant` that takes two arguments: a `const ConstantFP *` called `Fp` and a `raw_ostream &` called `O`. The function is used to print a floating-point constant. The first part of the code snippet checks the type of the floating-point constant and sets the number of hexadecimal digits to print based on the type. If the type is `FloatTyID`," LLVM,NVPTX,114,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `O << MI->getOpcodeName();` This statement is printing the opcode name of the machine instruction `MI` to the output stream `O`. The `getOpcodeName()` method is called on the `MachineInstr` object `MI` to retrieve the opcode name, and the result is then printed to the output stream using the `<<` operator." LLVM,NVPTX,115,"Based on the code snippet provided, it is difficult to predict the next statement with certainty. However, based on the context of the code, it appears that the next statement will be related to printing the load/store code for the specified instruction. The code is part of an assembler printer, and it is checking the modifier string to determine how to print the operand. If the modifier is a specific value, it will print a specific string. If the modifier is not a specific value, it will print a different string. Without more context, it is not possible to predict the exact" LLVM,NVPTX,116,"Based on the code snippet you provided, it appears to be a function that prints an operand of a machine instruction. The function takes three arguments: * `MI`: a machine instruction * `opNum`: the operand number * `O`: an output stream The function first calls `printOperand` with the specified operand number and output stream. If the modifier is not null and the modifier string is equal to a specific string literal, the function prints another operand with a different operand number and output stream. Otherwise, if the operand is an immediate value and its value" LLVM,NVPTX,117,"Based on the code snippet provided, it appears to be a part of a function that is handling different types of operands in a machine code. The function is using a switch statement to handle different types of operands, and the next statement is likely to be the start of the next case in the switch statement. The next case in the switch statement is likely to be `case MachineOperand::MO_GlobalAddress`, which is handling the case where the operand is a global address. The code is likely to be using the `Mang` object to get the symbol for the global address and then printing it to" LLVM,NVPTX,118,"Based on the code snippet provided, it is difficult to predict the next statement with certainty. However, based on the context and the control flow of the code, it is likely that the next statement will be: `case MachineOperand::MO_ExternalSymbol: {` This is because the previous case statements have been handled, and the code will move on to the next case statement, which is for `MachineOperand::MO_ExternalSymbol`." LLVM,NVPTX,119,"The code snippet you provided is a part of a function that appears to be printing the name of a function parameter. The function takes two arguments: `F`, which is a pointer to a function, and `paramIndex`, which is an integer representing the index of the parameter to print. The function first checks if the current function symbol is equal to the function symbol of the parameter at the specified index. If it is, it prints the name of the parameter and returns. If the current function symbol is not equal to the function symbol of the parameter at the specified index, the function loops through the arguments of the" LLVM,NVPTX,120,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `arg_begin` and `arg_end` functions, as well as the values of the `F` and `I` variables. However, based on the syntax and the context of the code, it is likely that the next statement will be an iteration over the arguments of the function `F`, using the `arg_begin` and `arg_end` functions to determine the range of arguments to iterate over. The `I` variable is likely to be used as an iterator to" LLVM,NVPTX,121,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `elems = vtparts[i].getVectorNumElements(); elemtype = vtparts[i].getVectorElementType();`. This statement initializes the `elems` and `elemtype` variables with the number of elements and the element type of the vector type `vtparts[i]`, respectively." LLVM,NVPTX,122,"Based on the code snippet you provided, it appears that the next statement will be: `O << *Mang->getSymbol(GVar);`. This is because the previous `if` statement checks if `CPV` is a `ConstantExpr`, and if it is, it strips any pointer casts and checks if the resulting value is a `GlobalValue`. If it is, it prints the symbol for that global value using `Mang->getSymbol(GVar)`." LLVM,NVPTX,123,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty because it appears to be incomplete or contain placeholders (such as ``, ``, etc.). However, based on the syntax and structure of the code, it appears to be a C++ program that is using the `<<` operator to output a string to a stream, and it is also using the `strcmp` function to compare a string with a modifier. Based on the code snippet provided, it is not possible to determine the exact output of the program, as it" LLVM,NVPTX,124,"The next statement after the `do` loop in the code snippet is: `theCurLine++;` This statement increments the value of `theCurLine` by 1, which means that the loop will continue to execute until `theCurLine` is greater than or equal to `lineNum`." LLVM,NVPTX,125,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `theCurLine++;`" LLVM,NVPTX,126,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `sys::path::append(FullPathName, Filename);`" LLVM,NVPTX,127,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `DISubprogram SP( *I );` This line is part of a loop that iterates over the subprograms in the debug information finder `DbgFinder`. The loop variable `I` is a pointer to a `DISubprogram` object, and the line `DISubprogram SP( *I );` creates a new `DISubprogram` object `SP` and initializes it with the contents of the `DISubprogram` object pointed to by `I`." LLVM,NVPTX,128,"Based on the code snippet you provided, it appears to be part of a function that is generating a register allocation table for a virtual machine. The code is iterating over the virtual registers in the machine and mapping them to physical registers. The next statement of the code snippet you provided is: O << << NumRegisters << ; This statement is outputting the number of registers in the machine, followed by a string literal, and then another string literal. The exact output will depend on the values of the string" LLVM,NVPTX,129,"The code snippet you provided is a part of a function that checks if a given value is a metadata node with a specific name. Here's the next statement of the code snippet: `if (const MDNode *md = dyn_cast(U)) {` This statement checks if the value `U` is a metadata node, and if it is, it casts it to a `MDNode` pointer and assigns it to the variable `md`. The `dyn_cast` function is used to perform a dynamic cast, which means that it checks if the value `" LLVM,NVPTX,130,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `const Function * caller = bb -> getParent ( ) ;` This statement retrieves the parent function of the basic block `bb`, which is the function that contains the instruction `I`. The variable `caller` is then assigned the address of this function." LLVM,NVPTX,131,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be: `const Use &use = *ui;` This is because the code is iterating over the uses of a constant `C` using the `use_begin()` and `use_end()` methods, and the current use is being referenced by the iterator `ui`. The next statement is likely to be extracting the `Use` object from the iterator and storing it in a variable named `use`." LLVM,NVPTX,132,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `aggBuffer->addBytes(&Byte, , );` This statement adds the value of `Byte` to the `aggBuffer` buffer, which is a buffer of bytes. The `addBytes` method takes three arguments: a pointer to the data to be added, the number of bytes to be added, and the offset at which to add the data. In this case, the data to be added is the value of `Byte`, which is a single byte, and the number of bytes to be added is" LLVM,NVPTX,133,"The next statement in the code snippet is: `AggBuffer->addSymbol(V, Cexpr->getOperand());` This statement adds a symbol to the aggregation buffer, where the symbol is the value of the operand of the `PtrToInt` instruction, and the size of the symbol is the size of the operand. The `stripPointerCasts` method is used to remove any pointer casts from the operand before adding it to the aggregation buffer." LLVM,NVPTX,134,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `if (Pty->isPointerTy()) return false;`" LLVM,NVPTX,135,"The next statement after the `if` block is the `else` block. Inside the `else` block, there is a nested `if` statement that checks if `U` is a `User` object. If it is, then the loop will iterate over the operands of `U` and call the `DiscoverDependentGlobals` function on each operand. Therefore, the next statement after the `if` block is the `else` block, and the next statement after the `else` block is the loop that iterates over the operands of `U`." LLVM,NVPTX,136,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `for (unsigned i = 0, e = U->getNumOperands(); i != e; ++i) {` This line is a `for` loop that iterates over the operands of the `User` object `U`. The loop variable `i` is initialized to 0, and the loop continues until `i` is equal to the number of operands `e`. The loop body is executed for each operand, and it calls the `DiscoverDependentGlobals` function recursively with the operand and the" LLVM,NVPTX,137,"The next statement in the code snippet is: `bool ret = AsmPrinter::doFinalization(M);`" LLVM,NVPTX,138,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `AsmPrinter` class and the `doInitialization` method. However, based on the code snippet provided, it is likely that the next statement will be: `GlobalsEmitted = true;` This is because the `doInitialization` method is called on the `AsmPrinter` object, and it is likely that this method will initialize the `GlobalsEmitted` flag to `true` if the initialization is successful." LLVM,NVPTX,139,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `OutStreamer->emitRawText(StringRef(""""));` This statement is executed if the `isLoopHeaderOfNoUnroll` function returns `true` for the current basic block `MBB`. The `emitRawText` method is called on the `OutStreamer` object with the string literal `` as an argument." LLVM,NVPTX,140,"It looks like the code snippet is trying to print out a function signature, with the function name and parameters. Based on the syntax, it appears to be using a template metaprogramming library. The next statement is likely to be: ``` O << ; ``` This statement is appending a string literal to the output stream `O`. The string literal is likely to be the function name or a parameter name. It's difficult to predict the exact output without knowing the specific implementation of the `getSymbol` and `emitFunctionParamList` functions," LLVM,NVPTX,141,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `printReturnValStr` and `getSymbol` functions, as well as the value of the `F` and `O` variables. However, based on the syntax and the fact that the `printReturnValStr` function is being called with two arguments, it is likely that the next statement will be a call to the `print` function with the `O` variable as the first argument and the `MAI` variable as the second argument. It is also possible that" LLVM,NVPTX,142,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `if (bb->getParent() == F) {`" LLVM,NVPTX,143,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `emitDeclaration(F, O);` Explanation: The code snippet is part of a loop that iterates over the instructions in a function. The loop checks if the current instruction is an `Instruction` object, and if it is, it gets the parent basic block of the instruction. If the basic block is not null, it gets the parent function of the basic block. If the function is not null, it checks if the function has already been seen before. If it has not been seen before, it emits a declaration for the" LLVM,NVPTX,144,The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be the closing brace (`}`) of the `emitFunctionBodyEnd` function. LLVM,NVPTX,145,"The next statement in the code snippet is: O << ;" LLVM,NVPTX,146,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be a call to the `write` method of the `raw_svector_ostream` object `O`, which is used to write data to the output stream. Here is an example of what the next statement might look like: ``` O.write(data); ``` This statement will write the data stored in the `data` variable to the output stream `O`. The `write` method takes a single argument, which is the data to be written to the stream. In this case, the data is stored in the `data` variable." LLVM,NVPTX,147,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be: `O << ""("";` This is because the `emitFunctionParamList` method is responsible for printing the parameter list of a function, and the `O` variable is an output stream that is being used to print the function's parameters. The `<<` operator is used to insert the opening parenthesis of the parameter list into the output stream." LLVM,NVPTX,148,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `for (unsigned i = 0, e = Globals.size(); i != e; ++i) printModuleLevelGV(Globals[i], OS2);` This is a loop that iterates over the `Globals` vector and calls the `printModuleLevelGV` function on each element. The loop starts at index 0 and ends at the size of the `Globals` vector minus 1. The loop variable `i` is incremented by 1 on each iteration." LLVM,NVPTX,149,"Based on the code snippet provided, it appears to be generating a string representation of a PTX (Parallel Thread Execution) version and target machine information. The next statement is likely to be a call to the `getDrvInterface()` method of the `TargetMachine` class, which is a subclass of `Machine`. The `getDrvInterface()` method returns a string representing the driver interface used by the target machine. Therefore, the next statement is likely to be: ``` O << NTM.getDrvInterface(); ``` This statement will append the driver interface string to" LLVM,NVPTX,150,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `getMF` and `getSubtarget` methods. However, based on the names of these methods and the context in which they are being called, it is likely that they are related to the management of the machine's instruction set architecture (ISA). Given this, it is possible that the next statement of the code snippet will be a call to a method that is responsible for executing an instruction in the ISA, such as `executeInstruction`. However, without more information" LLVM,NVPTX,151,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `getMF` and `getSubtarget` methods, as well as the value of the `RegNo` variable. However, based on the naming conventions used in the code, it appears that the next statement is likely to be a call to the `getName` method of the `RegisterInfo` class, passing in the value of `RegNo` as an argument." LLVM,NVPTX,152,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `lowerToMCInst` and `EmitToStreamer` functions. However, based on the names of these functions, it is likely that the next statement will be related to the emission of machine code to a streamer. One possible next statement could be: ``` OutStreamer->EmitInstruction(Inst); ``` This statement would emit the machine code instruction represented by the `Inst` object to the streamer." LLVM,NVPTX,153,"The next statement of this code snippet is: if ( ! getReqNTIDx ( F , reqntidx ) ) reqntidx = ; else specified = true ; This statement is checking if the required NTIDx value is not available, and if it is not, it is setting the reqntidx variable to a default value of . If the required NTIDx value is available, the specified variable is set to true." LLVM,NVPTX,154,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `O << ;` This is because the `if` statement that precedes it has an `else` clause that is executed if the condition `!V->hasInternalLinkage() && !V->hasPrivateLinkage()` is true. In this case, the `O << ` statement is executed, which appends a string literal to the output stream `O`." LLVM,NVPTX,155,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the input and the specific implementation of the `report_fatal_error` function. However, based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the next statement will be: `report_fatal_error( + llvm::Twine(AddressSpace));` This is because the `default` case in the `switch` statement is reached, and the `report_fatal_error` function is called with an error message that includes the `AddressSpace` value" LLVM,NVPTX,156,"The next statement in the code snippet is: O << ; break ; This is because the code is currently inside the case block for the ADDRESS_SPACE_SHARED case, and the next statement after the break statement is the O << statement." LLVM,NVPTX,157,"Based on the code snippet you provided, it appears to be a part of a function that is trying to print a symbol and its size. The function takes a `GVar` parameter, which is likely a global variable, and an `ElementSize` parameter, which is the size of the element being printed. The function first calls `getSymbol` on `GVar` to get the symbol, and then prints it using `print`. It then prints the size of the element using `ElementSize`. Based on the code you provided, it is difficult to predict the next statement of the code snippet with" LLVM,NVPTX,158,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `OutStreamer->emitRawText(OS1.str());` This statement is calling the `emitRawText` method of the `OutStreamer` object, passing the string generated by the `OS1` object as an argument. The `emitRawText` method is responsible for emitting the raw text of the machine code to the output stream." LLVM,NVPTX,159,"Based on the code snippet you provided, it appears to be a part of a function that is trying to map a virtual register to a physical register. The function is using a `DenseMap` to store the mapping, and it is checking the type of the register class to determine the correct shift amount to use for the mapping. The next statement of the code snippet you provided is: `Ret = ( << ) ;` This statement is assigning the result of a bitwise left shift operation to the `Ret` variable. The left oper" LLVM,NVPTX,160,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `Ret |= (RegNum & );` This statement is executed if the `else` block is entered, which means that the `if` condition was not met. The statement sets the `Ret` variable to the result of bitwise ORing the `RegNum` variable with a literal value." LLVM,NVPTX,161,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return OutContext.getOrCreateSymbol(Str);` This statement is returning a symbol that is created or retrieved from the `OutContext` object using the `getOrCreateSymbol` method. The symbol is created using the `Str` string, which is a concatenation of the `DEPOTNAME` and the function number." LLVM,NVPTX,162,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `raw_svector_ostream ( Str ) << DEPOTNAME << getFunctionNumber ( ) ;` This statement is a concatenation of two strings, `DEPOTNAME` and the result of the `getFunctionNumber()` function, which is not shown in the code snippet. The resulting string is then written to the `raw_svector_ostream` object `Str`." LLVM,NVPTX,163,"Based on the code snippet, it appears that the `switch` statement is checking the type of the `Ty` object and returning a string based on the type. The next statement in the code snippet is `case Type::FloatTyID:`, which means that the `switch` statement is checking if the type of `Ty` is `FloatTyID`. If it is, the code will return the string literal ``." LLVM,NVPTX,164,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `Type` class and the values of the `HalfTyID`, `FloatTyID`, and `DoubleTyID` constants. However, based on the pattern of the code snippet, it is likely that the next statement will be a `return` statement that returns a string literal. The string literal will likely be a string representation of the type of the `PointerTyID` constant. Therefore, the next statement of this code snippet is likely to be: ```" LLVM,NVPTX,165,"The next statement after the code snippet you provided is likely to be a check for the validity of the `ConstantArray` pointer, as the `dyn_cast` operation can return a null pointer if the cast is not possible. Here is an example of what the next statement might look like: ``` if (InitList == nullptr) { // Handle the case where the initializer is not a ConstantArray } ``` Alternatively, the next statement could be a check for the number of elements in the `ConstantArray`, as the `getInitializer` method" LLVM,NVPTX,166,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `if (InitList->getNumOperands() == 0) return true;`" LLVM,NVPTX,167,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `for (const MachineBasicBlock *PMBB : MBB.predecessors()) {` This line is a for loop that iterates over the predecessors of the current basic block (represented by `MBB`). The loop variable `PMBB` is a pointer to a `MachineBasicBlock` object, and the loop body will be executed for each predecessor of `MBB`." LLVM,NVPTX,168,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `RegisterAsmPrinter` function and the `getTheTarget32` function. However, based on the syntax and the fact that `RegisterAsmPrinter` is a function that registers an assembly printer, it is likely that the next statement will be a call to the `RegisterAsmPrinter` function with the `X` variable as an argument. Here is a possible next statement: ``` RegisterAsmPrinter(X" LLVM,NVPTX,169,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `std::string SymName = *SymNamePtr;`" LLVM,NVPTX,170,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `getManagedStrPool` and `getManagedString` methods, as well as the value of the `Sym` variable. However, based on the names of the methods and the fact that they are being called on a `std::string` pointer, it is likely that the next statement will be a call to the `std::string` constructor or a method that operates on the `std::string` object. For example, the next statement could be: ```" LLVM,NVPTX,171,"The next statement in the code snippet is: case Type::DoubleTyID: MCOp = MCOperand::createExpr(FloatMCExpr::createConstantFPDouble(Val, OutContext)); break;" LLVM,NVPTX,172,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `OutMI.addOperand(GetSymbolRef(OutContext.getOrCreateSymbol(Twine(MO.getSymbolName()))));` This statement adds an operand to the `OutMI` object, which is an instance of the `MachineInstr` class. The operand is obtained by calling the `GetSymbolRef` function on the `OutContext` object, which is an instance of the `MachineContext` class. The `GetSymbolRef` function returns a reference to a symbol, which is then added to the `Out" LLVM,NVPTX,173,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `O << ']' ; return false ;`" LLVM,NVPTX,174,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific values of the variables and the behavior of the `ExtraCode` function. However, based on the code snippet provided, it is likely that the next statement will be: `O << ']' ;` This is because the code snippet ends with the statement `O << '[' ;`, which suggests that the next statement will be to output a closing square bracket." LLVM,NVPTX,175,"This code snippet is a part of a function called `PrintAsmOperand` that is used to print an assembly operand. The function takes four arguments: `MI`, `OpNo`, `ExtraCode`, and `O`. The function first checks if `ExtraCode` is not null and if the character at index `` (which is a number literal) is not equal to `` (which is also a number literal). If this condition is true, the function returns `true`. If the condition is false, the function enters a `switch` statement" LLVM,NVPTX,176,"The next statement of this code snippet is: O << lead << format_hex_no_prefix(API.getZExtValue(), numHex, true); This statement is outside the if-else block and is executed regardless of the condition of the if-else block. It takes the value of the APInt API and formats it as a hexadecimal string with the specified number of digits and prefix. The formatted string is then output to the stream O." LLVM,NVPTX,177,"Based on the code snippet you provided, it appears to be a part of a function that is printing out the operands of a machine instruction. The function takes three arguments: `MI`, `opNum`, and `O`. The first line of the code snippet calls a function called `printOperand`, which is not defined in the code snippet you provided. The function takes three arguments: `MI`, `opNum`, and `O`. The second line of the code snippet checks if the `Modifier` variable is not null and if the `Modifier` string is equal to a specific string literal" LLVM,NVPTX,178,"Based on the code snippet you provided, it appears to be a part of a function that is generating some kind of output based on the contents of a global variable. The output is being written to a stream called `O`, and the function is using a number of string literals and integer constants to generate the output. Without more context, it's difficult to say exactly what the next statement of the code snippet will be, but some possible options include: * Writing more output to the `O` stream using the `<<` operator. * Checking the value of a variable or expression to determine" LLVM,NVPTX,179,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet without knowing the specific context and inputs that will be passed to the function. However, based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the function is processing a machine operand and printing it to a stream. The function starts by checking the type of the machine operand and then printing it to the stream based on its type. The types of machine operands that are handled by this function include: * MO_Register: This type of machine operand represents a register. The function calls the `emitVirtualRegister` function to print the register to the" LLVM,NVPTX,180,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `AsmPrinter` class and the `MachineFunction` class. However, based on the context of the code snippet, it appears that the next statement is likely to be related to printing the return value of the function. One possible next statement could be: ``` O << ""return "" << F.getReturnValue().getType().getAsString() << ""\n""; ``` This statement would print the return type of the function, followed by a newline character. However" LLVM,NVPTX,181,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `MF` object and the `getFunction()` method. However, based on the syntax and the fact that the `getFunction()` method is being called on the `MF` object, it is likely that the next statement will be a call to the function returned by the `getFunction()` method." LLVM,NVPTX,182,"The next statement in this code snippet is: `O << ;` This is because the code is checking if `CPV` is a constant expression, and if it is, it strips any pointer casts and checks if the resulting value is a global variable. If it is, and if `EmitGeneric` is true and the global variable is not a function, then it prints the symbol for the global variable to the output stream `O`." LLVM,NVPTX,183,"The next statement in the code snippet is: `OutStreamer->emitRawText(StringRef(""""));` This statement is calling the `emitRawText` method of the `OutStreamer` object, passing it a `StringRef` object that contains the string literal """". The `emitRawText` method is used to output a raw string to the output stream." LLVM,NVPTX,184,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the `AsmPrinter::runOnMachineFunction()` method is not known. However, based on the name of the method and the fact that it is called with a `MachineFunction` object, it is likely that the method performs some kind of assembly-related operation on the machine function. Without more information about the specific implementation of the `AsmPrinter` class and the `runOnMachineFunction()` method, it is not possible to provide a more specific prediction of the next statement." LLVM,NVPTX,185,"Based on the code snippet provided, it is difficult to predict the next statement with certainty. However, based on the context and the patterns in the code, it is likely that the next statement will be: O << << NumBytes << ; This is because the code is setting up a string stream to emit a function's virtual registers, and the previous statement is setting the number of bytes for the stack frame. The next statement is likely to be emitting the number of bytes as a string literal." LLVM,NVPTX,186,"The next statement after the `if` block is: `return true;` This is because if the `dyn_cast` operation succeeds and `cu` is not null, the `useFuncSeen` function is called with `cu` and `seenMap` as arguments. If the `useFuncSeen` function returns `true`, the `if` block is executed and the function returns `true`. If the `useFuncSeen` function returns `false`, the `if` block is not executed and the function returns `false`." LLVM,NVPTX,187,The next statement after the `for` loop is `Order.push_back(GV)`. LLVM,NVPTX,188,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `for (int i = 0; i < Num; ++i) { buffer[curpos] = Ptr[i]; curpos++; }` This is the first loop in the code snippet, which copies the contents of the `Ptr` array into the `buffer` array, starting at the current position `curpos`. The loop iterates `Num` times, and each iteration copies one element from `Ptr` to `buffer`. The `curpos` variable is incremented by 1 at the end of each iteration, so that the next" LLVM,NVPTX,189,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `buffer[curpos] = ; curpos++;`" LLVM,NVPTX,190,"The next statement after the code snippet you provided is: Symbols.push_back(GVar); This statement adds the value of the variable GVar to the end of the Symbols vector. The numSymbols variable is then incremented by 1." LLVM,NVPTX,191,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the context in which the code is being executed and the values of the variables involved. However, based on the information provided, it is likely that the next statement after `Symbols.push_back(GVar)` would be a statement that uses the `Symbols` vector, such as iterating over its elements or accessing a specific element." LLVM,NVPTX,192,"The next statement of this code snippet is: for ( int i = 0 ; i < Num ; ++ i ) {" LLVM,NVPTX,193,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the program depends on the input data and the specific implementation of the `AggBuffer` class. However, based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the next statement after the constructor call would be the first statement inside the constructor, which is the assignment of the `_size` parameter to the `size` member variable. Therefore, the next statement of this code snippet would be: ``` size = _size; ```" LLVM,NVPTX,194,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `TargetStreamer` class and the `OutStreamer` class. However, based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the next statement will be: `OutStreamer->emitRawText();` This is because the `closeLastSection()` method is called on the `TargetStreamer` object, and then the `emitRawText()` method is called on the `OutStreamer` object. The `emitRawText()` method is" LLVM,NVPTX,195,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `EmitAlignment(NumBits, GV);`" LLVM,NVPTX,196,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `EmitAlignment(NumBits, GV);`" LLVM,NVPTX,197,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `emitDeclaration(&F, O);` Explanation: The code snippet is part of a loop that iterates over the instructions in a function. The loop checks if the current instruction is an `Instruction` object, and if it is, it gets the parent basic block of the instruction. If the basic block is not null, it gets the parent function of the basic block. If the function is not null, it checks if the function has already been seen before. If the function has not been seen before, it emits a declaration for" LLVM,NVPTX,198,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `O << ;` This statement is printing a string literal to the output stream `O`. The string literal is not specified in the code snippet, so it is not possible to determine what the exact string will be. However, based on the context, it is likely that the string is a newline character (`\n`) or some other whitespace character." LLVM,NVPTX,199,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `gvars` container and the `O` stream. However, based on the syntax and the fact that the code is iterating over a container of `GlobalVariable` objects, it is likely that the next statement will be a call to a method or function that operates on the current `GV` object, such as `GV->getName()` or `GV->getType()`." LLVM,NVPTX,200,"The next statement of this code snippet is: O << << align.value() << ; This statement is part of the `if` block that starts with `if ( isABI || isKernelFunc ) {`. It is printing the alignment of the pointer element type `ETy` using the `align` variable, which is the alignment of the parameter `paramIndex` as computed by the `getValueOrABITypeAlignment` method of the `DataLayout` class. The `align.value()` expression returns the numerical value of the" LLVM,NVPTX,201,"Based on the code snippet provided, it appears to be generating PTX (Parallel Thread Execution) code for the NVIDIA GPU architecture. The code is defining a function that takes a variable `ETy` and a `GVar` as input, and it appears to be generating code to print the type of the variable `ETy` and its value. The code is using a number of C++ classes and functions from the LLVM library, such as `Type`, `StructTyID`, `ArrayTyID`, `FixedVectorTyID`, `getTypeID`, `getTypeStore" LLVM,NVPTX,202,"The next statement of this code snippet is: O << * (unsigned int *)(buffer + pos); This is because the code checks if nBytes is equal to a specific value (which is not shown in the code snippet), and if it is, it writes the value of the unsigned int pointer at the address (buffer + pos) to the output stream O." LLVM,NVPTX,203,"Based on the code snippet provided, it is difficult to predict the next statement with certainty. However, based on the context and the patterns in the code, it is likely that the next statement will be another `if` statement or a `switch` statement. The code appears to be generating PTX (Parallel Thread Execution) code for a GPU, and the `if` and `switch` statements are likely checking the type of the variable being processed and generating the appropriate PTX code for that type. The `if` statement checks if the variable is a floating-point, pointer, or integer type," LLVM,NVPTX,204,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `for ( const GlobalVariable * GV : Others ) VisitGlobalVariableForEmission ( GV , Order , Visited , Visiting ) ;` This is a for-each loop that iterates over the elements of the `Others` set, which contains the dependent global variables discovered by the `DiscoverDependentGlobals` function. The loop body calls the `VisitGlobalVariableForEmission` function for each global variable in the `Others` set, passing the global variable, the `Order` vector, the" LLVM,NVPTX,205,"The next statement after `delete [] buffer;` would be the end of the current scope, such as a closing brace `}`." LLVM,NVPTX,206,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `buffer = new char[1024];` This statement allocates a new buffer of size 1024 bytes and assigns it to the `buffer` variable." LLVM,NVPTX,207,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `aggBuffer->addZeros(Bytes);` This statement is executed when the type of the constant value `CPV` is not a floating-point type, but is instead an aggregate type (such as an array or struct). In this case, the function `bufferAggregateConstant` is called to add the elements of the aggregate constant to the `aggBuffer`, and then any remaining bytes are added as zeros." LLVM,NVPTX,208,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `emitHeader(M, OS1, STI);` This is because the code snippet ends with a call to `emitHeader`, which is the last function call in the snippet. The `emitHeader` function takes three arguments: `M`, `OS1`, and `STI`. The `M` argument is a `Module` object, which is the module being compiled. The `OS1` argument is a `raw_svector_ostream` object, which is a stream that writes to a string. The `STI` argument is a" LLVM,NVPTX,209,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `emitDeclaration(F, O);`" LLVM,NVPTX,210,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `emitDeclaration(F, O);` Explanation: The code snippet is a loop that iterates over the users of a function `F`. For each user `U`, it checks if `U` is a constant, and if so, it checks if the constant is used in a global variable definition or if it has been seen before. If either of these conditions is true, the code emits a declaration for `F` and `O` and breaks out of the loop. If `U` is not a constant or if it has" LLVM,NVPTX,211,"Based on the code snippet provided, it appears to be a part of a function that is emitting a label for a function entry. The function is called `EmitFunctionEntryLabel` and it is a member of a class called `AsmPrinter`. The function appears to be emitting a label for a function entry, and it is using a `raw_svector_ostream` object to write the label to a string. The function is also checking if globals have been emitted before emitting them. It is difficult to predict the next statement of the code snippet without more context, as" LLVM,NVPTX,212,"Based on the code snippet you provided, it appears that the next statement will be: `O << ;` This is because the `if` statement checks if `isKernelFunction(*F)` is true, and if it is, it will execute the statement `O << ;` inside the `if` block. If it is not true, it will execute the statement `O << ;` outside the `if` block. Therefore, the next statement will be `O << ;`" LLVM,NVPTX,213,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `emitGlobalVariable` method and the `GlobalVariable` class. However, based on the name of the method and the parameter it takes, it is likely that this method is responsible for emitting code to define a global variable in the target language. The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be a call to the `emit` method of the `GlobalVariable` object, passing in the name of the global variable and any other relevant information. This will cause the `emit`" LLVM,NVPTX,214,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `emitGlobalVariable` method and the `GlobalVariable` class. However, based on the name of the method and the parameter it takes, it is likely that this method is responsible for emitting code to define a global variable in the target language. The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be a call to the `emit` method of the `GlobalVariable` object, passing in the name of the global variable and any other relevant information. This will cause the `emit`" LLVM,NVPTX,215,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `StringRef fileName ( Scope -> getFilename ( ) ) ;` This line retrieves the filename of the current scope using the `getFilename()` method, and assigns it to the `fileName` variable." LLVM,NVPTX,216,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `if (InterleaveSrc) this->emitSrcInText(fileName, curLoc.getLine());` This statement checks if the `InterleaveSrc` flag is set, and if so, it calls the `emitSrcInText` method on the current object, passing in the `fileName` and the current line number as arguments." LLVM,NVPTX,217,"Based on the code snippet you provided, it appears that the next statement after the `break` statement will be the `case` statement for `ADDRESS_SPACE_SHARED`. The `break` statement will exit the `switch` statement and continue executing the code after the `switch` statement. In this case, the next statement after the `break` statement is the `case` statement for `ADDRESS_SPACE_SHARED`." LLVM,NVPTX,218,"The next statement of this code snippet is: O << ; Explanation: The code snippet is a method named `emitPTXAddressSpace` that takes an `unsigned int` parameter named `AddressSpace` and a `raw_ostream` parameter named `O`. The method switches on the value of `AddressSpace` and outputs a string literal to `O` depending on the value of `AddressSpace`. The string literals are not provided in the code snippet, but they are likely to be some kind of PTX address space qualifier." LLVM,NVPTX,219,"Based on the code snippet you provided, it appears to be generating PTX (Parallel Thread Execution) code for a GPU. The code is using the `emitPTXAddressSpace` function to emit the address space of a global variable, and then it is checking the alignment of the variable and emitting the appropriate PTX code for the variable's type. Based on this information, it is difficult to predict the next statement of the code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific values of the variables and the behavior of the `emitPTXAddressSpace` and `getPTXF" LLVM,NVPTX,220,"The next statement after the `if` block will be the statement following the `if` block, which is: `return reader -> readLine ( ) ;`" LLVM,NVPTX,221,"The next statement in this code snippet is: reader = new LineReader(filename);" LLVM,NVPTX,222,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `if (GetUnrollMetadata(LoopID, )) return true;` This statement is inside the `if` block that checks if the `LoopID` metadata is present in the terminator of the basic block. If the `GetUnrollMetadata` function returns `true`, the function returns `true`." LLVM,NVPTX,223,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `RegisterAsmPrinter` function and the `getTheTarget` functions. However, based on the syntax and the fact that the code is registering two different printers, it is likely that the next statement will be a call to one of these functions to register the printers. Here are a few possibilities: * `RegisterAsmPrinter(X, getTheTarget32());` *" LLVM,NVPTX,224,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `case Instruction :: Add : {` This is because the `switch` statement is currently evaluating the `Instruction::Add` case, and the next statement in the `Instruction::Add` case is the opening brace of a new block." LLVM,NVPTX,225,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the functions being called and the values of the variables involved. However, based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the next statement will be a call to the `GetSymbolRef` function, passing in the result of the `getOrCreateSymbol` function as an argument. The `getOrCreateSymbol` function is called on the `OutContext` object, passing in a `StringRef` object constructed from the `SymNamePtr` string. This function is likely to create a new" LLVM,NVPTX,226,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `const MachineFunctionInfo * MFI = MF->getInfo< MachineFunctionInfo >();` This line of code is retrieving a pointer to a `MachineFunctionInfo` object, which is a part of the `TargetMachine` class. The `getInfo` method is being called on the `MF` object, which is an instance of the `MachineFunction` class. The `getInfo` method is a template method that takes a type parameter, which in this case is" LLVM,NVPTX,227,"The next statement of this code snippet is: case Type::DoubleTyID: This is because the code is checking the type of the constant floating-point value and creating an expression for it based on that type. The `Type::DoubleTyID` case is handling the case where the type is `double`, and it is creating an expression using the `FloatMCExpr::createConstantFPDouble` function." LLVM,NVPTX,228,"The next statement of this code snippet is: O << lead; Explanation: The code snippet is part of a function called `printFPConstant` that takes a `ConstantFP` object and a `raw_ostream` object as arguments. The function is responsible for printing a floating-point constant to the output stream. The code snippet starts by creating an `APFloat` object from the `getValueAPF` method of the `ConstantFP` object. It then checks the type of the floating-point constant and converts it to a string representation using the `uto" LLVM,NVPTX,229,"The next statement of this code snippet is: O << << ElementSize / ;" LLVM,NVPTX,230,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `unsigned size = ;` This is the first line of the `if` statement, which checks if the type `Ty` is a floating-point or integer type. If it is, the `size` variable is set to the number of bits in the type. If it is not, the `size` variable is set to the size of the type in bits, or the size of the type in bytes if it is a pointer type. If it is an aggregate or vector type, the `size` variable is set to the" LLVM,NVPTX,231,"Based on the code snippet you provided, it appears to be a part of a function that is generating a string representation of a type. The code is using the LLVM API to get information about the type and its components, and is then generating a string representation of the type based on that information. The next statement of the code snippet you provided is: O << << sz << << idx ; This statement is appending a string to the output stream O, where the string is composed of the following parts: * A string literal (" LLVM,NVPTX,232,"The next statement in the code snippet is: FullPathName += ""/"";" LLVM,NVPTX,233,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `OutStreamer->EmitDwarfFileDirective(i, , Filename);` This statement is emitting a DWARF file directive, which is a debugging information directive that specifies the name of a file and its directory. The `EmitDwarfFileDirective` method is called on the `OutStreamer` object, passing in the current file index `i`, a string literal representing the file name, and the `Filename` string. This directive is used to associate the file name with" LLVM,NVPTX,234,"The next statement in the code snippet is: O << ; break ; This is the final statement in the switch statement, and it is executed when the value of the variable ""op"" is equal to the string literal ""NUM""." LLVM,NVPTX,235,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be another output operation using the `<<` operator, as the previous two statements are also output operations. Therefore, the next statement is likely to be: O << ; This statement will output the string literal to the output stream `O`." LLVM,NVPTX,236,"The next statement of this code snippet is: O << ; Explanation: The code snippet is a method named `printImplicitDef` that takes two parameters: a `const MachineInstr *` and a `raw_ostream &`. The method is defined in a class named `AsmPrinter`. The method is responsible for printing an implicit definition of a machine instruction. The first statement of the method is to print a string literal using the `<<` operator on the `raw_ostream` object. The string literal is not specified in the code snippet," LLVM,NVPTX,237,"Based on the code snippet provided, it appears to be a part of a larger program that is generating assembly code for a specific target architecture. The code is checking the value of a ""Modifier"" string and based on that, it is generating different assembly code. The next statement of the code snippet is: if ( ! strcmp ( Modifier , ) ) { if ( Imm ) O << ; } This statement is checking if the ""Modifier"" string is equal to a specific string literal (represented by getSymbol ( ) ; This is because the code is currently inside a switch statement that is checking the value of the MachineOperand enum. The current case is MachineOperand::MO_ExternalSymbol, and the code is checking if the symbol name contains a specific string literal. If it does, it will print the parameter name using the printParamName function. If it doesn't, it will check if the symbol name contains a different string literal, and if it" LLVM,NVPTX,240,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the context in which the code is being executed and the values of the variables involved. However, based on the information provided, it is likely that the next statement after `Symbols.push_back(GVar)` would be a statement that uses the `Symbols` vector, such as iterating over its elements or accessing a specific element." LLVM,NVPTX,241,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the context in which the code is being executed and the values of the variables involved. However, based on the information provided, it is likely that the next statement after `Symbols.push_back(GVar)` would be a statement that uses the `Symbols` vector, such as iterating over its elements or accessing a specific element." LLVM,NVPTX,242,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `buffer = new unsigned char[size];` This statement allocates an array of `unsigned char` elements with the size specified by the `size` parameter, and assigns the address of the first element to the `buffer` variable." LLVM,NVPTX,243,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet without knowing the context and the purpose of the code. However, based on the code snippet provided, it appears to be a part of a function that is processing a constant pointer value (CPV) and generating a buffer for it. The code snippet is checking if the number of operands in the CPV is greater than 0, and if so, it is iterating over the operands and generating a buffer for each one. The buffer is being generated using the `TD` object, which is likely a type descriptor or a type layout object." LLVM,NVPTX,244,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `Bytes = TD -> getStructLayout ( ST ) -> getElementOffset ( i + ) - TD -> getStructLayout ( ST ) -> getElementOffset ( i ) ;` This statement calculates the size of the current element in the struct, by subtracting the offset of the current element from the offset of the next element. The result is stored in the `Bytes` variable." LLVM,NVPTX,245,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `aggBuffer->addZeros(, Bytes);` This statement adds zeros to the aggregation buffer, which is used to store the values of the constant pool. The number of zeros added is determined by the value of ``, which is a placeholder for a numerical literal. The `Bytes` parameter is also used to determine the number of zeros to add." LLVM,NVPTX,246,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `if (gv->hasInternalLinkage() == false) return false;` This statement checks if the global variable `gv` has internal linkage. If it does not have internal linkage, the function `canDemoteGlobalVar` returns `false`." LLVM,NVPTX,247,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be: `oneFunc = f;` This is because the code is checking the linkage and address space of the global variable `gv` and the function `f`, and if they meet certain conditions, it sets the `oneFunc` variable to `f`." LLVM,NVPTX,248,"The next statement in the code snippet is: `OutStreamer.AddComment();`." LLVM,NVPTX,249,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `getAnalysisIfAvailable` and `AnalyzeModule` functions, as well as the `TargetLoweringObjectFile` and `Mangler` classes. However, based on the names of the functions and classes, it is likely that the next statement will be related to the initialization of the `Mangler` object, which is used to generate the mangled name of the module. Here is a possible next statement: ``` Mang->Initialize(" LLVM,NVPTX,250,"Based on the code snippet you provided, it appears to be a part of a function that is responsible for printing out a declaration for a function. The function takes two parameters: a pointer to a `Function` object and a reference to a `raw_ostream` object. The function first calls `emitLinkageDirective` to emit a linkage directive for the function, and then it checks if the function is a kernel function using the `llvm::isKernelFunction` function. If the function is a kernel function, it prints out a string literal using the `O` object, which is a reference" LLVM,NVPTX,251,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `OutStreamer` class and the contents of the string literal. However, based on the syntax and the fact that the `EmitRawText` method is being called, it is likely that the next statement will be the emission of the contents of the string literal to an output stream." LLVM,NVPTX,252,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `OutStreamer` and `VRegMapping` classes. However, based on the names of the methods and the fact that `VRegMapping` is being cleared, it is possible that the next statement will be a call to `OutStreamer.EmitRawText` with a string that is the result of concatenating the contents of `VRegMapping`." LLVM,NVPTX,253,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `emitDemotedVars` and `getFunction` functions, as well as the contents of the `O` object. However, based on the syntax and the context of the code, it is likely that the next statement will be a call to the `EmitRawText` method of the `OutStreamer` object, passing in the result of the `str` method of the `O` object as an argument." LLVM,NVPTX,254,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `setAndEmitFunctionVirtualRegisters` function and the `SmallString` and `raw_svector_ostream` classes. However, based on the names of these classes and functions, it is likely that the next statement will be related to emitting a string or vector of characters to the output stream `O`. Here are a few possibilities for what the next statement could be: * `O << Str;` - This would emit the contents of the `Str` string" LLVM,NVPTX,255,"Based on the code snippet you provided, it appears to be generating assembly code for a function that is part of a larger program. The code is using the LLVM library to generate the assembly code. The code is defining a variable `MRI` as a pointer to a `RegInfo` structure, and a variable `F` as a pointer to a `Function` structure. It is then calling the `getRegInfo` and `getFunction` functions to retrieve the `RegInfo` and `Function` structures associated with the current function. The code is then calling the `emitLinkageDirective" LLVM,NVPTX,256,"Based on the code snippet you provided, it appears to be a part of a function that is responsible for emitting a label for a function entry in a machine-readable intermediate representation (MIR) format. The next statement of the code snippet is likely to be the emission of the function's parameter list using the `emitFunctionParamList` function. This is because the previous statement in the code snippet is the emission of the function's linkage directive, which is typically followed by the emission of the function's parameter list. Therefore, the next statement of the code snippet is likely to" LLVM,NVPTX,257,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `if ( PTy ) { O << << thePointerTy . getSizeInBits ( ) << ; if ( nvptxSubtarget . getDrvInterface ( ) != ) { Type * ETy = PTy -> getElementType ( ) ; int addrSpace = PTy -> getAddressSpace ( ) ; switch ( addrSpace ) { default : O << ; break ;`" LLVM,NVPTX,258,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `OS2 << '\n';` This statement writes a newline character to the output stream `OS2`." LLVM,NVPTX,259,"The next statement after the code snippet you provided is: `GVVisited.clear();` This statement clears the `GVVisited` set, which is a set of `const GlobalVariable*` pointers that have been visited during the emission of declarations. By clearing this set, the code is preparing to visit a new set of global variables." LLVM,NVPTX,260,"Based on the code snippet you provided, it appears to be generating a string based on the values of various properties of a `nvptxSubtarget` object. The string is being output to a stream called `O`. Based on the code you provided, the next statement is likely to be: `O << ;` This statement is outputting a string literal to the `O` stream. The string literal is not specified in the code snippet you provided, so it is not possible to determine what the exact string will be." LLVM,NVPTX,261,"Based on the code snippet provided, it appears to be generating a string based on various conditions. It is difficult to predict the exact output without knowing the values of the variables and the specific implementation of the functions being called. However, we can make some educated guesses based on the code snippet. The first `if` statement checks if `nvptxSubtarget.getDrvInterface()` returns a specific string. If it does, then the code will output a string literal. The second `if` statement checks if `nvptxSubtarget.hasDouble()` returns `false`. If it" LLVM,NVPTX,262,"This code snippet is a part of a function named `emitImplicitDef` that is a member of a class named `AsmPrinter`. The function takes a `const MachineInstr *` pointer named `MI` as an argument. The function first retrieves the register number of the operand at index `` in the `MI` instruction using the `getOperand` method. It then retrieves the `TargetRegisterInfo` object for the target machine using the `getRegisterInfo` method of the `TM` object. If the retrieved register number is a virtual" LLVM,NVPTX,263,"The next statement in the code snippet is: `EmitToStreamer(OutStreamer, Inst);` This statement is calling the `EmitToStreamer` function, which is defined in the `llvm::MCInst` class. The function takes two arguments: the first is an `llvm::MCStreamer` object, and the second is an `llvm::MCInst` object. The function emits the instruction represented by the `MCInst` object to the streamer, which is then written to the output file." LLVM,NVPTX,264,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be: `OS << Inst;` This is because the previous statement, `lowerToMCInst(MI, Inst)`, is likely to have populated the `Inst` variable with the lowered machine instruction, and the next statement is likely to be the output of that instruction to the `OS` stream." LLVM,NVPTX,265,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific values of the variables and the behavior of the functions being called. However, based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the next statement will be: `if ( specified ) O << << reqntidx << << reqntidy << << reqntidz << ;` This is because the `specified` variable is set to `true` in the previous line," LLVM,NVPTX,266,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `SmallString FullPathName = dirName;` This statement declares a variable `FullPathName` of type `SmallString` and initializes it with the value of `dirName`. The `SmallString` class is a string class that is optimized for small strings, and `NUM_LIT` is a placeholder for a numerical literal that represents the maximum size of the string." LLVM,NVPTX,267,"The next statement of this code snippet is: O << ; Explanation: The code snippet is part of a function called `emitLinkageDirective` that is responsible for emitting a linkage directive for a given global value `V`. The function checks the linkage of the global value and emits a different directive depending on the linkage. In this case, the linkage of the global value is `external`, which means that it is defined in another module. The function then checks the type of the global value and emits a directive depending" LLVM,NVPTX,268,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `O << ;` This is because the previous `if` statement was not executed, and the `else` block is executed. The `O << ` statement is the first statement in the `else` block." LLVM,NVPTX,269,"Based on the code snippet you provided, it appears to be generating PTX code for a GPU. The code is checking the alignment of a global variable and then printing out the type and symbol of the variable. The next statement in the code snippet is: `case Type::StructTyID: case Type::ArrayTyID: case Type::VectorTyID:` This is a switch statement that checks the type of the variable. If the type is a struct, array, or vector, it will print out the type and symbol of the variable." LLVM,NVPTX,270,"Based on the code snippet you provided, it appears to be generating a string representation of a variable or constant. The `ElementSize` variable is being set to the size of the type of the variable `ETy`, and then the name of the variable is being output to the string. If `ElementSize` is non-zero, then the size of the variable is also being output to the string. It's difficult to predict the exact output of the code without knowing the values of the variables and constants being used, but it appears to be generating a string that represents a variable or constant in a specific format." LLVM,NVPTX,271,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `temp << ;` This statement is a concatenation operation, where the contents of the `temp` variable are concatenated with the string literal ``. The resulting string is then stored back in the `temp` variable." LLVM,NVPTX,272,"The code snippet you provided is incomplete, so it's difficult to predict the next statement with certainty. However, based on the context, it appears that the code is trying to calculate the alignment of a structure type. If the structure type is not null, the code calculates the alignment of the structure by multiplying the alignment of each element in the structure by the number of elements in the structure. If the structure type is null, the code returns the alignment of the structure as is. Therefore, the next statement of the code snippet could be: * Calculating the alignment of the structure" LLVM,NVPTX,273,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return ;` This is because the `switch` statement is checking the value of `Type` and returning a string literal based on the value of `Type`. The first two cases are checking for `FloatTyID` and `DoubleTyID`, and the third case is checking for `PointerTyID`. If `Type` is any of these values, the corresponding string literal will be returned. If `Type` is not any of these values, the `llvm_unreachable` function will be called, which will" LLVM,NVPTX,274,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return MCOperand::CreateExpr(Expr);` This statement is returning the result of the `MCOperand::CreateExpr` function, which creates a new `MCOperand` object from the `Expr` object. The `Expr` object is a `MCSymbolRefExpr` object that was created on the previous line of the code snippet." LLVM,NVPTX,275,"The next statement after the code snippet you provided is: `return MCOperand::CreateExpr(Expr);` This statement creates a new `MCOperand` object using the `Expr` object created in the previous line of code. The `CreateExpr` method is called on the `MCOperand` class, passing in the `Expr` object as an argument. This creates a new `MCOperand` object that represents the expression `Expr`." LLVM,NVPTX,276,"The next statement after the `if` block is the `return true` statement. The `if` block checks if `PI` is not equal to the end of the `TypeNameMap` and if the `second` field of `PI` is not equal to any of the three string literals. If this condition is true, the `return true` statement is executed, which returns `true` from the function. Therefore, the next statement after the `if` block is the `return true` statement." LLVM,NVPTX,277,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the `isImageType` function depends on the specific implementation of the `AsmPrinter` class and the input type `Ty`. However, based on the name of the function and the fact that it takes a `const Type *` as an argument, it is likely that this function checks whether the input type is an image type, and returns `true` if it is and `false` otherwise. Therefore, the next statement of this code snippet is likely to be a check of the return" LLVM,NVPTX,278,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet without knowing the specific implementation of the `RegisterAsmPrinter` function and the `ISA_LIT` macro. However, based on the syntax and the fact that the `RegisterAsmPrinter` function is being called with a template argument, it is likely that the next statement will be a call to the `RegisterAsmPrinter` function with the `Y` variable as the first argument and the result of the `ISA_LIT` macro as the second argument. For example, if the `ISA_LIT" LLVM,NVPTX,279,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it appears to be part of a larger function and the context is not provided. However, based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the next statement will be a `switch` statement that checks the opcode of the `ConstantExpr` object `CE`. The `switch` statement will likely contain several `case` statements that handle different opcodes, and the default case will likely contain an error message or a call to `llvm_unreachable`." LLVM,NVPTX,280,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `case :`" LLVM,NVPTX,281,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the functions and methods being called. However, based on the names of the functions and methods, it appears that the code is working with a symbol table and is trying to retrieve a symbol reference for a given symbol. The first line of the code snippet declares a pointer to a `std::string` called `SymNamePtr`, which is initialized to the result of calling the `getManagedStrPool` method on an object called `nvTM`. The `getManagedStrPool` method appears" LLVM,NVPTX,282,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet without knowing the specific inputs and the context in which it is being executed. However, based on the code snippet provided, it appears to be a part of a function that is converting machine operands to LLVM IR. The switch statement is checking the type of the machine operand and creating a corresponding LLVM IR operand. The cases are checking for different types of machine operands, such as immediate values, basic blocks, external symbols, global addresses, and floating-point immediate values. Based on the code snippet, it is likely that the" LLVM,NVPTX,283,"The next statement of this code snippet is: O << ; Explanation: The code snippet is part of a function that is generating assembly code for a specific target platform. The function is using a loop to iterate over a buffer of data and generate assembly code for each element in the buffer. The loop is controlled by the variable `pos`, which is initialized to a specific value and incremented by a fixed amount (either 4 or 8 bytes, depending on the target platform) with each iteration. The next statement of the code snippet is `O <<" LLVM,NVPTX,284,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `printFPConstant(MO.getFPImm(), O);`" LLVM,NVPTX,285,"Based on the code snippet you provided, it appears to be a part of a function that is checking the driver interface of a subtarget and then iterating over the arguments of a function. The next statement of the code snippet is likely to be: `if (i < F->arg_size())` This statement checks if the current argument index `i` is less than the total number of arguments `F->arg_size()` of the function. If this condition is true, then the loop will continue to the next iteration, otherwise it will exit the loop." LLVM,NVPTX,286,"This code snippet is part of a function that is generating a string representation of a type. It is using the LLVM API to get information about the type and its components. The code is checking the type of the variable `Ty` and generating a string representation of it based on its type. If `Ty` is a pointer type, it is getting the size of the pointer in bits. If `Ty` is a struct or vector type, it is getting the total size of the type and the alignment of the type. If `Ty` is a vector type, it is getting the number of elements in the vector" LLVM,NVPTX,287,"The next statement of this code snippet is: O << *getSymbol(GVar);" LLVM,NVPTX,288,"Based on the code snippet you provided, it appears that the next statement will be: O << *getSymbol(GVar); This is because the code is currently inside the `else` block of the `if` statement that checks whether `CPV` is a `ConstantExpr`. If `CPV` is not a `ConstantExpr`, then the code will execute the `else` block, which contains the statement `O << *getSymbol(GVar);`." LLVM,NVPTX,289,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `sys::path::append(FullPathName, Filename);` This line of code is part of the `for` loop that iterates over the `DICompileUnit` objects in the `DbgFinder.compile_units()` collection. The loop body is executed for each `DICompileUnit` object, and it appends the `Filename` string to the `FullPathName` string if the `Dirname` string is not empty and the `Filename` string is not an absolute path." LLVM,NVPTX,290,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `unsigned int numVRs = MRI->getNumVirtRegs();`" LLVM,NVPTX,291,"Based on the code snippet provided, it is difficult to predict the next statement with certainty. However, based on the context of the code, it appears to be generating a string representation of a register mapping for a specific function. The code is using the `raw_svector_ostream` class to generate a string representation of the register mapping, and it is using the `TargetRegisterInfo` and `MachineFrameInfo` classes to get information about the registers and the function. The `NumBytes` variable is being used to keep track of the number of bytes in the register mapping, and the `nvpt" LLVM,NVPTX,292,"The next statement after the `if` block is: `return false;` This is because the `if` block is only executed if the condition `GV->getName().str() == ` is true. If the condition is false, the `return false;` statement is executed." LLVM,NVPTX,293,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `if (const MDNode *md = dyn_cast(U)) {` This is a conditional statement that checks if the `U` object is a `MDNode` object. If it is, then the code inside the `if` block will be executed." LLVM,NVPTX,294,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `const BasicBlock * curBB = instr->getParent();`" LLVM,NVPTX,295,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `Visiting.insert(GV);` This line adds the current global variable `GV` to the `Visiting` set, which is used to keep track of the global variables that are currently being visited. The `insert` method is called on the `Visiting` set, passing in the `GV` variable as the element to be inserted." LLVM,NVPTX,296,"The next statement after the code snippet you provided is: `Others.insert(GV->getOperand(i));` This statement inserts the operand of the current global variable `GV` at index `i` into the `Others` set. The `insert` method is called on the `Others` set, passing in the operand as an argument. This adds the operand to the set, which is used to keep track of the dependent global variables." LLVM,NVPTX,297,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `buffer = new char[1024];` This statement allocates a new buffer of size 1024 bytes and assigns it to the `buffer` variable." LLVM,NVPTX,298,"The next statement in the code snippet is: `O << ;` This statement is a call to the `operator<<` function, which is used to output a string literal to the output stream `O`. The string literal is represented by the `` placeholder." LLVM,NVPTX,299,"Based on the code snippet you provided, it appears to be generating PTX (Parallel Thread Execution) code for a GPU. The code is using the `emitPTXAddressSpace` function to emit the address space of a global variable, and the `getSymbol` function to get the symbol of the global variable. The next statement of the code snippet is: O << ; This statement is emitting a string literal to the output stream `O`. The string literal is not specified in the code snippet you provided, so it is not possible to determine what the" LLVM,NVPTX,300,"Based on the code snippet you provided, it appears to be generating a string representation of a type in a programming language. The next statement is likely to be a case statement that handles the different types of variables. Here is a possible next statement: case Type::PointerTyID: O << ""ptr"" << getPTXFundamentalTypeStr(ETy) << "" "" << getSymbol(GVar) << ""["" << ElementSize << ""]""; break; This case statement handles the case where the type is a pointer type. It prints the string ""ptr""" LLVM,NVPTX,301,"Based on the code snippet you provided, it appears to be a part of a function that is trying to determine the alignment of a type. The function is using a combination of bitwise operations and arithmetic operations to calculate the alignment. The next statement of the code snippet is: `unsigned idx = ;` This line of code is declaring a new variable called `idx` and initializing it to a value of ``. The value of `` is not specified in the code snippet you provided, so it is not possible to determine what" LLVM,NVPTX,302,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `i = 0;` Explanation: The code snippet is part of a function that is finalizing the global variables of a module. The function first emits the globals, then it creates an array of pointers to the global variables and initializes it with the values from the module's global list. The loop then removes all the global variables from the list and inserts them back in the reverse order. Finally, the function clears the annotation cache and deletes the array of pointers. The next statement after the loop is `" LLVM,NVPTX,303,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `global_list.insert(global_list.end(), gv_array[i]);` This is because the `for` loop is currently iterating over the elements of the `gv_array` and inserting each element into the `global_list` at the end. The loop will continue until the `i`th element of `gv_array` is inserted, at which point the loop will terminate." LLVM,NVPTX,304,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be: O << ; This is because the previous statement ends with a semicolon, indicating the end of a statement, and the next statement starts with the output stream operator (<<) followed by a string literal, which is a common pattern in C++ code." LLVM,NVPTX,305,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `OutStreamer->EmitRawText(StringRef());` This statement is calling the `EmitRawText` method of the `OutStreamer` object, passing it a `StringRef` object that contains the string literal ``. The `EmitRawText` method will output the string to the output stream." LLVM,NVPTX,306,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `OutStreamer` class and the `AddComment` method. However, based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the next statement will be an invocation of the `AddComment` method on the `OutStreamer` object, passing in a string argument that is constructed by concatenating the string literal `` with the result of the `getVirtualRegisterName` method or the `getName` method, depending on the value of the `RegNo` variable." LLVM,NVPTX,307,"Based on the code snippet you provided, it appears to be generating PTX (Parallel Thread Execution) code for a GPU. The code is creating a variable `O` and then using it to emit PTX instructions. The next statement is likely to be a case statement that handles different types of data, such as floating-point numbers, integers, or pointers. The statement will likely use the `emitPTXFundamentalTypeStr` function to emit the appropriate PTX instructions for the type of data being processed. It's also possible that the next statement will be a call to the `" LLVM,NVPTX,308,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `alignStruct = std::max(alignStruct, getOpenCLAlignment(TD, ETy));` This is because the code is iterating over the elements of a struct type and calculating the maximum alignment of all the elements. The `alignStruct` variable is initialized to the preferred alignment of the struct type, and then it is updated with the maximum of the current value and the alignment of each element." LLVM,NVPTX,309,"The next statement of this code snippet is: return false; Explanation: The code snippet is checking if the given MachineBasicBlock is a loop header and if it is not, it returns false. If it is a loop header, it then checks if all the predecessors of the block are in the same loop as the block itself. If any of the predecessors are not in the same loop, it returns false. If all the predecessors are in the same loop, it returns true." LLVM,NVPTX,310,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty because it is dependent on the input data and the specific implementation of the `ComputeValueVTs` function. However, based on the context and the code structure, it appears that the next statement is likely to be a loop that iterates over the elements of the `vtparts` vector, and within that loop, it is likely to be a statement that performs some operation on the `elemtype` variable, such as calling a method or accessing a field." LLVM,NVPTX,311,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it appears to be a part of a larger function and the context is not provided. However, based on the code snippet, it appears that the function is working with types and is trying to determine the size and alignment of the type. The code snippet is using a number of variables and functions that are not defined in the snippet, such as `Ty`, `TLI`, `TD`, `F`, and `ComputeValueVTs`. It is also using a number of constants, such as ``," LLVM,NVPTX,312,"The next statement of this code snippet is: O << * getSymbol ( GVar ) ; Explanation: The code snippet is part of a function that is printing a constant value. The function takes a constant value as an argument and checks its type using the `dyn_cast` function. If the type is a constant floating-point number, it prints the constant using the `printFPConstant` function. If the type is a constant pointer null, it prints the string """". If the type is a global value, it checks if it is a non-generic pointer" LLVM,NVPTX,313,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `rcStr += "":"" + std::to_string(n);`. Explanation: The code snippet is defining a mapping from virtual registers to physical registers for a target ISA. The `VRegMapping` map is being initialized with the register classes and their corresponding register numbers. The `rcname` and `rcStr` variables are being used to store the name and string representation of the register class, respectively. The `n` variable is being used to store the number of registers in the register class. The code snippet is" LLVM,NVPTX,314,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return true;` Explanation: The code snippet is a function that takes two arguments, `U` and `oneFunc`, and checks if `U` is used in only one function, which is `oneFunc`. The function uses the `dyn_cast` function to cast `U` to an `Instruction` object, and then checks if `U` has a parent and a grandparent. If `U` does not have a parent or a grandparent, the function returns `false`. If `U` has a parent" LLVM,NVPTX,315,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `const BasicBlock * curBB = instr->getParent();` This statement retrieves the parent basic block of the current instruction, which is the basic block that contains the instruction. The variable `curBB` is then assigned the value of the parent basic block." LLVM,NVPTX,316,"It looks like the code snippet is generating a string representation of a function signature, including the function name, return type, and parameter list. Based on the code snippet, the next statement is likely to be: O << ; This statement is likely to be appending a string literal to the output stream O, which is being used to generate the string representation of the function signature. The string literal is likely to be a space or a newline character, as it is not specified in the code snippet." LLVM,NVPTX,317,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `if (Ty->isIntegerTy()) O << ;` This statement checks if the type of the current parameter is an integer type with a specific bit width (represented by ``). If it is, the code prints a string literal (represented by ``) to the output stream `O`." LLVM,NVPTX,318,"Based on the code snippet provided, it is difficult to predict the next statement with certainty. However, based on the context and the patterns in the code, it is likely that the next statement will be another case in the switch statement, or a statement that prints a parameter name. The code snippet appears to be generating a string representation of a parameter list for a function or method, based on the types of the parameters and the ABI (Application Binary Interface) or kernel function. The switch statement is checking the address space of the parameter type, and the case statements are printing different strings based on the address space. The" LLVM,NVPTX,319,"Based on the code snippet provided, it appears to be generating PTX (Parallel Thread Execution) code for a GPU. The code is using the `emitPTXAddressSpace` function to emit a PTX address space directive, and then it is checking the alignment of a variable `GVar` and emitting a directive to set the alignment if necessary. The next statement in the code snippet is: ``` if ( ETy -> isSingleValueType ( ) ) { ``` This statement checks if the type of the variable `ETy` is a single value type, such as a scalar" LLVM,NVPTX,320,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `ElementSize = TD -> getTypeStoreSize ( ETy ) ;` This statement assigns the result of the `getTypeStoreSize` method called on the `TD` object with the `ETy` argument to the `ElementSize` variable." LLVM,NVPTX,321,"It is difficult to determine the next statement of this code snippet with certainty because it is not a complete code snippet and there are multiple possible next statements. However, based on the context and the code that has been provided, it is likely that the next statement will be a continuation of the `for` loop that is currently being executed. In the `for` loop, the code is iterating over the characters in the `OriginalName` string and checking if each character is equal to the `.` character. If a character is equal to `.`, then the code will append the string ``" LLVM,NVPTX,322,"The next statement of this code snippet is: CleanNameStream << ""."";" LLVM,NVPTX,323,"return MCBinaryExpr::CreateAdd(LHS, RHS, Ctx); The next statement of this code snippet is: return MCBinaryExpr::CreateAdd(LHS, RHS, Ctx);" LLVM,NVPTX,324,"The next statement in this code snippet is: `case MachineOperand::MO_FPImmediate: {`" LLVM,NVPTX,325,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific inputs and the behavior of the `MachineOperand` class. However, based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the next statement will be: `case MachineOperand::MO_GlobalAddress: MCOp = GetSymbolRef(MO, getSymbol(MO.getGlobal())); break;` This is because the previous `case` statements have all been `break`ed out of, and the next `case` statement is for `MachineOperand::MO_GlobalAddress`." LLVM,NVPTX,326,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `const MachineOperand &MO = MI->getOperand(i);`" LLVM,NVPTX,327,"Based on the code snippet provided, it appears to be a part of a larger function that is responsible for printing out machine code instructions. The code is using the LLVM library to generate machine code. The next statement of the code snippet is likely to be a case statement that handles the different types of machine operands. The code is currently handling the case where the machine operand is a register, and it is checking if the register is a physical register or a virtual register. If it is a physical register, it is printing out the register name, and if it is a virtual register, it is calling a function to" LLVM,NVPTX,328,"The next statement in the code snippet is: `printVecModifiedImmediate(MO, Modifier, O);`" LLVM,NVPTX,329,"Based on the code snippet you provided, the next statement is likely to be: O << getSymbolName(GVar); This is because the previous if statement checks if CPV is a constant pointer null, and if it is not, it casts CPV to a GlobalValue and assigns it to GVar. Then, it checks if GVar is a global value, and if it is, it prints the symbol name of GVar to O." LLVM,NVPTX,330,"The next statement after the code snippet you provided is: `f = oneFunc;` This is because the code checks if `oneFunc` is null before assigning it to `f`. If `oneFunc` is null, the function returns false. Otherwise, it assigns `oneFunc` to `f` and returns true." LLVM,NVPTX,331,"The next statement in this code snippet is: `OutStreamer.AddComment();`." LLVM,NVPTX,332,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `emitInlineAsm(M, OS1, STI);`" LLVM,NVPTX,333,"The next statement of this code snippet is: O << << sz << ; printParamName ( I , paramIndex , O ) ; if ( j < je - ) O << ; ++ paramIndex ;" LLVM,NVPTX,334,"This code snippet is part of a function that emits implicit definitions for a machine instruction in an assembly printer. It is using the LLVM API to generate assembly code. The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be the definition of the `emitImplicitDef` function, which is a member function of the `AsmPrinter` class. The function takes a `const MachineInstr *` argument, which is a pointer to a machine instruction, and a `const unsigned` argument, which is the register number of the implicit definition. The function first retrieves the register number of the implicit" LLVM,NVPTX,335,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be the call to the `EmitOperand` function, which is used to emit the operands of the instruction. The `EmitOperand` function takes a `MachineInstr` pointer as an argument, just like the `EmitInstruction` function. Here is the predicted next statement of the code snippet: ``` EmitOperand(MI, OS); ``` This statement will emit the operands of the instruction represented by `MI` to the `raw_svector_ostream` object `OS`. The `Emit" LLVM,NVPTX,336,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `OutStreamer.EmitRawText(temp.str());` This statement is emitting the raw text of the current location to the output streamer. The `temp` stringstream object is used to construct the raw text, which is then passed to the `EmitRawText` method of the `OutStreamer` object." LLVM,NVPTX,337,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `temp << line;` This statement appends the value of the `line` variable to the `temp` string." LLVM,NVPTX,338,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `temp << reader->readLine(line);` This statement reads a line from the `reader` object and appends it to the `temp` string." LLVM,NVPTX,339,The next statement after `break;` is `case Type::PointerTyID:`. LLVM,NVPTX,340,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `OutMI.addOperand(GetSymbolRef(OutContext.GetOrCreateSymbol(Twine(MO.getSymbolName()))));` This statement adds an operand to the `OutMI` object, which is an instance of the `MachineInstr` class. The operand is obtained by calling the `GetSymbolRef` method on the `OutContext` object, which is an instance of the `MachineContext` class. The `GetSymbolRef` method returns a reference to a symbol, which is then passed to the `add" LLVM,NVPTX,341,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `OutMI.addOperand(GetSymbolRef(OutContext.GetOrCreateSymbol(Twine(MO.getSymbolName()))));`" LLVM,NVPTX,342,"Based on the code snippet provided, it is difficult to predict the next statement with certainty. However, we can make an educated guess based on the context. The code snippet appears to be generating PTX code for a global variable. The variable is being declared with a specific type and alignment, and its initializer is being printed if it exists. The code also handles the case where the variable is an aggregate type (e.g., a struct or array) and has an initializer. Based on this information, it is likely that the next statement will be related to printing the initializer for the global" LLVM,NVPTX,343,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `O << ;` This statement is printing a string literal to the output stream `O`. The string literal is not specified in the code snippet, so it is not possible to determine its exact value. However, based on the context, it appears to be a string that is part of a larger message or error message." LLVM,NVPTX,344,"The next statement of this code snippet is: O << *CurrentFnSym << """" << paramIndex;" LLVM,NVPTX,345,"Based on the code snippet provided, it appears to be a part of a larger function that is generating a string representation of a type. The code is checking the type of the variable `Ty` and generating a string representation of it based on its type. The next statement of the code snippet is likely to be the continuation of the `if` statement that checks if `Ty` is a floating-point or integer type. If `Ty` is a floating-point or integer type, the code will generate a string representation of its size in bits. If `Ty` is a pointer type, the code will generate" LLVM,NVPTX,346,"Based on the code snippet you provided, it appears to be a part of a function that is generating a string representation of a vector type. The code is using the LLVM API to get information about the vector type and its elements, and is then generating a string that represents the vector type in a specific format. The next statement in the code snippet is: ``` O << ; ``` This statement is appending a string literal to the output stream `O`. The string literal is not specified in the code snippet you provided, so it is not possible to determine what the exact" LLVM,NVPTX,347,"Based on the code snippet you provided, the next statement is likely to be: `StringRef Filename = SP->getFilename();` This is because the code is iterating over the `subprograms` collection of the `DbgFinder` object, and each `MDSubprogram` object has a `getFilename` method that returns a `StringRef` representing the filename of the subprogram. The code is then using this filename to perform some operations, such as adding it to a map and emitting a DWARF file directive." LLVM,NVPTX,348,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `for (const MDCompileUnit * DIUnit : DbgFinder.compile_units()) {` This line is the start of a for loop that iterates over the compile units in the `DbgFinder` object. The loop variable `DIUnit` is a pointer to a `MDCompileUnit` object, and the loop body will be executed for each compile unit in the `DbgFinder` object." LLVM,NVPTX,349,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `const TargetRegisterClass * RC = TRI -> getRegClass ( i ) ;` This line retrieves the `TargetRegisterClass` object for the current register class index `i`. The `getRegClass` method is called on the `TRI` object, which is an instance of the `TargetRegisterInfo` class. The `TargetRegisterClass` object is then stored in the `RC` variable." LLVM,NVPTX,350,"The next statement after the `if` block is the `for` loop. The loop will iterate over the users of `C` and check if any of them are constant expressions that are used in the definition of a global variable. If such a constant expression is found, the function will return `true`. If no such constant expression is found, the function will return `false`." LLVM,NVPTX,351,"Based on the code snippet you provided, it seems like the next statement will be: O << << align << ; printParamName ( I , paramIndex , O ) ; O << << sz << ; continue ; } This is because the previous if statement was not taken, so the code will continue to the next statement, which is the printParamName function call." LLVM,NVPTX,352,"Based on the code snippet you provided, it appears to be a part of a function that encodes a virtual register. The function takes an unsigned integer `Reg` as input and returns an encoded value. The function first checks if the input register is a virtual register using `TargetRegisterInfo::isVirtualRegister`. If it is not, the function returns an error code. If the input register is a virtual register, the function retrieves the register class of the input register using `MRI->getRegClass`. It then uses the register class to look up the corresponding register mapping in the `VRegMapping" LLVM,NVPTX,353,"Based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the next statement will be: O << ""retval"" << idx << "":"" << elemtype.getSizeInBits() << "":"" << elems << "":"" << retAlignment << "":"" << totalsz << "":""; This is based on the fact that the code is currently iterating over the elements of a vector type, and the next statement appears to be printing out information about each element. The exact output will depend on the values of the variables used in the statement, but it is likely to be a string containing the name of the" LLVM,NVPTX,354,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `buffer = new unsigned char[size];` This statement allocates an array of `unsigned char` elements with the size specified by the `_size` parameter, and assigns the address of the first element to the `buffer` variable." LLVM,NVPTX,355,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `i = 0;` Explanation: The code snippet is part of a function that is performing some cleanup operations on a module. The function first retrieves a list of global variables from the module using the `getGlobalList()` method, and then creates an array of pointers to these global variables. The array is allocated using `new` and its size is set to the number of global variables in the module. The next statement in the code snippet is `i = 0;`, which initializes the loop counter `i`" LLVM,NVPTX,356,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `clearAnnotationCache(&M);` This is because the `for` loop will execute the statement `global_list.insert(global_list.end(), gv_array[i]);` for each value of `i` from `` to `n-1`, and then the statement `clearAnnotationCache(&M);` will be executed. The `delete[] gv_array;` statement is not executed until after the `for` loop has completed." LLVM,NVPTX,357,"The next statement in this code snippet is: `OutStreamer->EmitRawText(OS1.str());` This statement is emitting the raw text of the output stream `OS1` to the output streamer." LLVM,NVPTX,358,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the code is dependent on the specific implementation of the `AsmPrinter` class and the input data it is processing. However, based on the name of the method and the fact that it is part of the `AsmPrinter` class, it is likely that this method is responsible for emitting the end of a function body in assembly code. This could involve emitting a `ret` instruction or other code that marks the end of the function. Without more information about the specific implementation of" LLVM,NVPTX,359,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the program depends on various factors such as the input data, the specific implementation of the `VRegMapping` class, and the environment in which the program is running. However, based on the name of the method `clear()`, it is likely that this method is used to clear or reset the mapping between virtual registers and physical registers. Therefore, the next statement of this code snippet could be any statement that follows the `clear()` method, such as a statement that initializes the mapping or a statement that performs some other" LLVM,NVPTX,360,"The next statement in the code snippet is: O << ;" LLVM,NVPTX,361,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the program depends on the specific implementation of the `emitDemotedVars` function and the `getFunction` method. However, based on the syntax and the context of the code, it is likely that the next statement will be a call to the `emitDemotedVars` function, passing the result of the `getFunction` method as an argument. The `emitDemotedVars` function is likely to be responsible for emitting the demoted variables, which are the variables that" LLVM,NVPTX,362,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the functions being called and the data being processed. However, based on the context and the names of the functions being called, it is likely that the next statement will be related to emitting the function parameter list or directives for a kernel function. The `emitFunctionParamList` function is called with the current function symbol and the output streamer, which suggests that the next statement will be related to emitting the function parameter list for the current function. The `emitKernelFunctionDirectives`" LLVM,NVPTX,363,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the functions being called and the data being processed. However, based on the names of the functions being called, it appears that the code is related to the generation of machine code for a computer program. The `CurrentFnSym` variable is likely a symbol representing the current function being processed, and the `print` function is likely being used to print the function's name and parameters to the output stream. The `emitFunctionParamList` function is likely being used to generate the parameter list for the" LLVM,NVPTX,364,"Based on the code snippet you provided, it appears to be part of a larger program that is generating assembly code. The code is using the `getOperand` method to retrieve the operand at a specific index (represented by ``) from a machine instruction (`MI`). The operand is then retrieved using the `getReg` method, which returns the register number of the operand. The register number is then checked using the `isVirtualRegister` method of the `TargetRegisterInfo` class to determine if it is a virtual register. If it is, the code adds a" LLVM,NVPTX,365,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific values of the operands and the behavior of the functions called. However, based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the next statement will be: `OutStreamer->AddComment(Twine() + STI.getRegisterInfo()->getName(RegNo));` This statement will add a comment to the output streamer, using the `Twine` class to concatenate the string literal `` with the name of the register obtained from" LLVM,NVPTX,366,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be: `MCInst Inst;` This statement declares a variable named `Inst` of type `MCInst`, which is a data structure used to represent a machine instruction in the LLVM IR. The `lowerToMCInst` function is called with the `MI` parameter, which is a pointer to a `MachineInstr` object, and the `Inst` variable as the second parameter. The `lowerToMCInst` function is responsible for converting the `MachineInstr` object into a `MCInst` object, which can be used to" LLVM,NVPTX,367,"Based on the code snippet you provided, it appears that the next statement will be: `O << ;` This is because the previous statement, `O << getPTXFundamentalTypeStr(ETy) << ;` is followed by a switch statement that is checking the type ID of `ETy`. If the type ID is `StructTyID`, `ArrayTyID`, or `VectorTyID`, then the `ElementSize` variable is assigned the value of `DL.getTypeStoreSize(ETy)`. Otherwise, the `Element" LLVM,NVPTX,368,"Based on the code snippet you provided, it appears to be generating PTX (Parallel Thread Execution) code for a GPU. The code is checking the type of a variable and printing out a string representation of the type. The next statement of the code snippet is: O << ; This statement is printing out a string literal to the output stream O. The string literal is not specified in the code snippet you provided, so it is not possible to determine what the exact string will be. However, based on the context of the code, it is likely that the string" LLVM,NVPTX,369,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty because the behavior of the code depends on the values of the variables `RC` and `Ret`, which are not provided in the code snippet. However, based on the structure of the code, it appears that the code is checking the value of `RC` against a series of string literals, and if the value matches one of the literals, it is setting the value of `Ret` to a bitwise left shift of two numeric literals. Therefore, the next statement of the code snippet is likely to be another" LLVM,NVPTX,370,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `case Instruction::Add:`" LLVM,NVPTX,371,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `case Instruction::AddrSpaceCast:`" LLVM,NVPTX,372,"Based on the code snippet you provided, it appears to be a loop that is iterating over a sequence of values and printing them to the output stream `O`. The loop starts at position `pos` and increments by `nBytes` until it reaches the end of the sequence, which is determined by the `size` variable. Within the loop, there are two `if` statements. The first `if` statement checks if `pos` is non-zero, and if so, it prints a string literal to the output stream. The second `if` statement checks if `pos` is equal to" LLVM,NVPTX,373,"Based on the code snippet you provided, it appears to be a part of a function that is generating assembly code for a specific architecture. The code is using a loop to iterate over a buffer and generate assembly code for each element in the buffer. The next statement in the code snippet is: O << (unsigned int)buffer[i]; This statement is using the << operator to output the value of the buffer at index i as an unsigned integer. The value is cast to an unsigned integer before being output." LLVM,NVPTX,374,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `OutStreamer->EmitRawText(StringRef());` This statement is calling the `EmitRawText` method of the `OutStreamer` object, passing it a `StringRef` object that contains the string literal ``. The `EmitRawText` method will emit the contents of the `StringRef` object to the output streamer, which will then write the contents to the output file." LLVM,NVPTX,375,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return Result;` This statement is the last statement in the `runOnMachineFunction` method, and it returns the value of the `Result` variable, which is the result of the `AsmPrinter::runOnMachineFunction` method." LLVM,NVPTX,376,"The code snippet you provided is a part of a function that is iterating over the operands of a `User` object `U`. The `for` loop is initializing a variable `i` to `` and then incrementing it until it reaches the number of operands of `U`. Based on the information provided, it is not possible to predict the next statement of the code snippet with certainty. However, based on the context of the code, it is likely that the next statement will be a call to `dyn_cast` to cast the operand at index `" LLVM,NVPTX,377,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `emitDeclarations(M, OS2);` This is because the previous statement, `emitHeader(M, OS1);`, is a function call that takes two arguments: the first is a `Module` object, and the second is an `raw_svector_ostream` object. The `emitHeader` function is responsible for emitting the header of the module, which includes the module's name, version, and other metadata. After emitting the header, the code snippet then creates a new `raw_svector_ostream" LLVM,NVPTX,378,"Based on the code snippet provided, it is difficult to predict the next statement with certainty. However, based on the context and the patterns in the code, it is likely that the next statement will be related to the handling of the `PointerType` and its element type. One possible next statement could be: ``` O << << thePointerTy . getSizeInBits ( ) << ; ``` This statement would be consistent with the pattern of printing the size of the `PointerType` and its element type in bits, which has been" LLVM,NVPTX,379,"Based on the code snippet provided, it appears to be generating a string representation of a target machine, specifically a NVIDIA PTX target. The code is using the `<<` operator to concatenate various strings and values to form the final output. The next statement is likely to be another `O << ;` statement, where `` is a string literal that will be concatenated to the output. The statement after that is likely to be another `if` statement, where the condition is based on the value of `nvptxSubtarget . getDrv" LLVM,NVPTX,380,"Based on the code snippet provided, it appears to be generating a string representation of a target machine, specifically a NVIDIA GPU. The code is using the `<<` operator to concatenate strings and values, and it is using the `getPTXVersion()` method to get the version of the PTX (Portable Thread Execution) format supported by the target machine. The next statement in the code snippet is likely to be another concatenation of strings and values, using the `<<` operator. The specific statement will depend on the values of the variables and the methods called in the code snippet." LLVM,NVPTX,381,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `const FunctionType * FTy = dyn_cast < FunctionType > ( Ty ) ;` This line is casting the `Ty` variable to a `FunctionType` pointer, which is a type of pointer that represents a function in the LLVM IR. The `dyn_cast` function is used to perform a dynamic cast, which is a cast that can be performed at runtime. In this case, the `dyn_cast` function is used to check if the `Ty` variable is a `FunctionType` pointer, and if it" LLVM,NVPTX,382,"Based on the code snippet provided, it is difficult to predict the next statement with certainty. However, based on the context and the patterns in the code, it is likely that the next statement will be another case statement for a different instruction, such as `Instruction::FAdd` or `Instruction::FSub`. The code appears to be part of a function that takes a constant expression (`CE`) and a pointer to an `AssemblerParams` structure (`AP`) as input, and returns a lowered constant expression. The function uses a switch statement to handle different types of instructions, and each case" LLVM,NVPTX,383,"Based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the next statement will be: O << ; This is because the code is checking if the modifier is equal to a specific string literal, and if it is, it will output a string literal to the stream. The specific string literal that will be output is not specified in the code snippet provided, but it is likely that it will be one of the string literals that are being compared to the modifier in the if statements." LLVM,NVPTX,384,"The next statement after the code snippet you provided is: `Order.push_back(GV);` This line adds the `GlobalVariable` object `GV` to the end of the `Order` vector." LLVM,NVPTX,385,"The next statement in this code snippet is: `OutStreamer->EmitRawText(StringRef());` This statement is emitting a raw text string to the output streamer. The string is specified by the `StringRef` constructor, which takes a string literal as its argument. The string literal is not specified in the code snippet you provided, so we cannot determine what it is. However, based on the context, it is likely that the string literal is a newline character (`\n`) or some other whitespace character." LLVM,NVPTX,386,"The next statement in this code snippet is: `OutStreamer->EmitRawText(StringRef());` This statement is emitting a raw text string to the output streamer. The string is specified by the `StringRef` constructor, which takes a string literal as its argument. The string literal is not specified in the code snippet you provided, so we cannot determine what it is. However, based on the context, it is likely that the string literal is a newline character (`\n`) or some other whitespace character." LLVM,NVPTX,387,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `emitLinkageDirective` function and the `OutStreamer` class. However, based on the context and the syntax of the code, it is likely that the next statement will be an invocation of the `emitFunctionParamList` function, which is used to emit the parameter list of the function being emitted." LLVM,NVPTX,388,"Based on the code snippet you provided, it appears to be generating a string representation of a target machine. The code is using the `<<` operator to concatenate strings and the `getTargetName()` method to get the name of the target machine. Based on the code snippet, it is difficult to predict the next statement with certainty, as it depends on the implementation of the `getTargetName()` method and the `doesSupportDebugInformation()` method. However, it is likely that the next statement will be a call to one of these methods, or a concatenation of strings using the `<<` operator" LLVM,NVPTX,389,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `O << ;` This statement is a call to the `operator<<` function of the `O` object, passing in the `` string literal as an argument. The `O` object is likely an output stream, such as `std::cout` or `std::ofstream`, and the `operator<<` function is used to write the string to the output stream." LLVM,NVPTX,390,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet without knowing the context and the purpose of the code. However, based on the syntax and the use of the `static_cast` operator, it appears that the code is trying to cast a `TM` object to a `const TargetMachine &` reference. The `static_cast` operator is used to perform a cast between two types that are related by inheritance. In this case, the `TM` object is being cast to a `const TargetMachine &` reference, which means" LLVM,NVPTX,391,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `GVVisited.insert(Globals.begin(), Globals.end());` This statement inserts all the elements of the `Globals` vector into the `GVVisited` set. The `insert` method is called on the `GVVisited` set, passing in the range of elements from the `Globals` vector as arguments. This is done to keep track of the global variables that have already been visited during the emission of the globals." LLVM,NVPTX,392,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `O << ;` This is a call to the `print` method of the `O` object, which is an instance of a class that has a `print` method that takes a string literal as an argument. The purpose of this statement is to print the string literal to the output stream `O`." LLVM,NVPTX,393,"Based on the code snippet you provided, it appears to be generating PTX (Parallel Thread Execution) code for a GPU. The code is emitting instructions for a global variable `GVar`, which is of type `Type *`. The next statement is likely to be a case statement that handles different types of variables, such as integers, floating-point numbers, and arrays. The code will likely emit different instructions depending on the type of the variable. Without more context, it's difficult to provide a more specific answer. Can you provide more information about the code snippet or the context in which" LLVM,NVPTX,394,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return OutContext.getOrCreateSymbol(Str);` This statement is the last statement in the `getFunctionFrameSymbol` function, and it returns the symbol for the function frame. The `OutContext` object is a member of the `AsmPrinter` class, and it is used to manage the output of the assembly code. The `getOrCreateSymbol` method is called on the `OutContext` object to retrieve or create a symbol for the function frame, and the `Str` object is passed as an argument to the method. The" LLVM,NVPTX,395,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `for ( i = ; i < n ; i ++ ) global_list . insert ( global_list . end ( ) , gv_array [ i ] ) ;` This is a `for` loop that iterates over the elements of the `gv_array` array, starting from the index specified by ``, and inserts each element into the `global_list` list at the end. The loop will continue until the index `i` is less than the size of the `" LLVM,NVPTX,396,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `OutStreamer->EmitRawText("""");` This is because the `if` statement that precedes this line checks if `HasDebugInfo` is true, and if it is, it executes the code inside the `if` block, which includes the `OutStreamer->EmitRawText("""");` statement." LLVM,NVPTX,397,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `OutStreamer->EmitRawText(StringRef(""""));` This statement is executed if the condition `isLoopHeaderOfNoUnroll(MBB)` is true, which means that the current basic block is a loop header and the loop has been marked as not unrollable. In this case, the string """" is emitted to the output stream." LLVM,NVPTX,398,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `seenMap[F] = true;` This is because the code is checking if the function `F` has already been seen by checking if it is present in the `seenMap`. If it is not present, then it sets the value of `seenMap[F]` to `true` to indicate that it has been seen." LLVM,NVPTX,399,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `emitDeclaration(F, O);`" LLVM,NVPTX,400,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the functions being called and the data being processed. However, based on the names of the functions being called and the variables being used, it appears that the code is generating some kind of output based on the contents of the `MF` object. The `print` function is likely being used to print the contents of the `O` object to the output stream, and the `emitFunctionParamList` function is likely being used to generate a list of function parameters based on the contents of the `" LLVM,NVPTX,401,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it appears to be part of a larger program and the context is not provided. However, based on the syntax and the functions being called, it appears that the code is generating some kind of output or writing to a file. The `O` variable is being used as an output stream, and the `printReturnValStr` function is being called with `O` as an argument. This suggests that the function is printing some kind of return value to the output stream. The `emitFunctionParamList` function is also being" LLVM,NVPTX,402,"The next statement in this code snippet is: O << << sz << ; printParamName ( I , paramIndex , O ) ; continue ; }" LLVM,NVPTX,403,"Based on the code snippet you provided, it appears to be a part of a function that sets and emits virtual registers for a machine function. The function takes a `MachineFunction` object as an argument and uses it to retrieve information about the function's registers and frame information. The next statement of the code snippet is likely to be the start of a loop that iterates over the virtual registers in the function and sets their mapping to physical registers. The loop will likely use the `getNumVirtRegs` method of the `MachineRegisterInfo` object to get the number of virtual registers and then iterate over" LLVM,NVPTX,404,"Based on the code snippet provided, it is difficult to predict the next statement with certainty. However, based on the context and the structure of the code, it is likely that the next statement will be related to the `DenseMap` data structure and the `VRegMapping` map. The code snippet appears to be iterating over the virtual registers in a machine-specific register allocation problem, and it is creating a mapping from virtual registers to physical registers. The `DenseMap` data structure is used to store the mapping, and the `VRegMapping` map is used to store the mapping for each" LLVM,NVPTX,405,"The next statement in the code snippet is: O << ;" LLVM,NVPTX,406,The next statement after the `break` statement is the `case` statement for `llvm::ADDRESS_SPACE_SHARED`. LLVM,NVPTX,407,"The next statement of this code snippet is: O << getRegClassStr ( RC ) << mapped_vr;" LLVM,NVPTX,408,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the `switch` statement depends on the value of `MI.getOpcode()`. However, based on the syntax of the code, it appears that the `switch` statement is checking the value of `MI.getOpcode()` against a series of string literals, and returning `false` if the value does not match any of the literals." LLVM,NVPTX,409,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `O << ;` This is because the `if` statement that precedes it checks if `pos` is equal to `nextSymbolPos`, and if it is, it sets `v` to the value of `Symbols[nSym]` and `v0` to the value of `SymbolsBeforeStripping[nSym]`. If `v` is a `GlobalValue` and `v0` is a `PointerType`, then it sets `IsNonGenericPointer` to `true`. Otherwise, it outputs" LLVM,NVPTX,410,"Based on the code snippet you provided, it appears to be part of a function that is generating assembly code for a specific target machine. The code is using the `MCSymbol` class from the LLVM library to represent symbols in the assembly code. The next statement of the code snippet is likely to be the start of a loop that iterates over the symbols in the assembly code, using the `pos` variable to keep track of the current position in the code. The loop will likely use the `MCSymbol` class to get information about each symbol, such as its name and type, and will then generate" LLVM,NVPTX,411,"Based on the code snippet you provided, it appears to be part of a function that is performing some finalization tasks for an assembly printer. The function is defined within a class called `AsmPrinter`, and it appears to be using a variable called `OutStreamer` to emit raw text to the output stream. The next statement in the code snippet is: ``` if (auto *TS = static_castTargetStreamer *>(OutStreamer->getTargetStreamer())) { ``` This statement is checking if the `OutStreamer` object has a" LLVM,NVPTX,412,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `O << ;` This statement is part of the `for` loop that iterates over the function's arguments. It is used to print the argument's name and type to the output stream `O`." LLVM,NVPTX,413,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `O << ;` This statement is a call to the `operator<<` function, which is used to output a string literal to the output stream `O`. The string literal is represented by the `` placeholder." LLVM,NVPTX,414,"Based on the code snippet provided, it is difficult to predict the next statement with certainty. However, based on the context and the information provided, it is likely that the next statement will be a loop iteration, where the loop will continue to execute until the condition `pos < size` is no longer met. Within the loop, the code will likely perform some operations on the variables `pos`, `nSym`, `nextSymbolPos`, and `nBytes`, and may also output some data to the stream `O`. However, the exact nature of these operations and the data that will be output cannot be determined" LLVM,NVPTX,415,"Based on the code snippet provided, it is difficult to predict the next statement with certainty. However, based on the context and the information provided, it is possible to make some educated guesses. The code snippet appears to be related to the generation of machine code for a specific architecture. The `isABI` variable is being used to check if the current ABI is the one being targeted, and if it is, then the code is generating a specific sequence of instructions. The `Ty` variable appears to be a type object, and the code is checking its type ID to determine what kind of" LLVM,NVPTX,416,"This code snippet is part of a function that is generating a string representation of a type. It appears to be using the LLVM API to get information about the type and its components. The next statement is likely to be another `if` statement, as the current `if` statement has multiple branches. It is also possible that the next statement will be a `for` loop, as the current `for` loop has multiple iterations. Without more context, it is difficult to determine the exact next statement." LLVM,NVPTX,417,"The next statement in the code snippet is: `O << ;` This is a call to the `<<` operator on the `O` object, passing in a string literal as an argument. The `<<` operator is used for outputting data to a stream, so this statement is likely printing something to the output stream." LLVM,NVPTX,418,"Based on the code snippet provided, it is difficult to predict the next statement with certainty. However, based on the context and the patterns in the code, it is likely that the next statement will be a case statement or a switch statement that handles different types of elements. The code appears to be generating PTX (Parallel Thread Execution) code for a GPU, and the `emitPTXAddressSpace` function is used to emit the address space of a variable. The `getAddressSpace` function is used to get the address space of a variable, and the `getAlignment` function is used to get" LLVM,NVPTX,419,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `aggBuffer->addSymbol(v, Cexpr);` This line adds a symbol to the `aggBuffer` object, which is an instance of the `AggregateBuffer` class. The symbol is represented by the `v` variable, which is a `const Value *` pointer, and the `Cexpr` variable, which is a `const ConstantExpr *` pointer. The `addSymbol` method is called on the `aggBuffer` object, which adds the symbol to the buffer." LLVM,NVPTX,420,"The next statement of this code snippet is: O << << sz << ; printParamName ( I , paramIndex , O ) ;" LLVM,NVPTX,421,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `unsigned int alignStruct = ;` This line initializes the `alignStruct` variable to a specific value, which is represented by the placeholder ``. The value of `alignStruct` is used to store the alignment of the structure type `STy`." LLVM,NVPTX,422,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `case Instruction::AddrSpaceCast:` This is because the `switch` statement is checking the opcode of the `ConstantExpr` object `CE`, and the `AddrSpaceCast` opcode is one of the cases being checked. The code inside this case will be executed if the opcode of `CE` is `Instruction::AddrSpaceCast`." LLVM,NVPTX,423,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet without knowing the specific inputs and context in which it is being executed. However, based on the code snippet provided, it appears to be a part of a function that is processing a constant expression (CE) and generating a corresponding machine code expression (MCExpr) for it. The function appears to be handling different types of constant expressions, such as AddrSpaceCast and GetElementPtr, and generating a corresponding MCExpr for each one. The function is also using a raw_string_ostream to generate an error message if the constant expression cannot be lowered." LLVM,NVPTX,424,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `emitHeader(M, OS1, *STI);`" LLVM,NVPTX,425,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `StringRef fileName(Scope.getFilename());` This statement retrieves the filename of the current scope using the `getFilename()` method of the `Scope` object. The `StringRef` type is used to represent the filename as a reference to a string, which allows the filename to be passed around by reference without creating a copy of the string." LLVM,NVPTX,426,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific input and the behavior of the functions being called. However, based on the code snippet, it appears that the next statement will be: O << * ( unsigned int * ) ( & buffer [ pos ] ) ; This is because the code checks if nBytes is equal to 4, and if so, it casts the address of the buffer at position pos to an unsigned int pointer and then dereferences it to get the value." LLVM,NVPTX,427,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `OutStreamer.EmitDwarfFileDirective(i, , Filename);` This statement is emitting a DWARF file directive with the current file index `i` and the filename `Filename`. The directive is emitted to the output streamer `OutStreamer`." LLVM,NVPTX,428,"The next statement in the code snippet is: `StringRef Filename(SP.getFilename());` This statement declares a new `StringRef` object named `Filename` and initializes it with the value returned by the `getFilename()` method of the `DISubprogram` object `SP`." LLVM,NVPTX,429,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `O << << sz << ;` This statement is part of the `else` block of the `if ( isABI || isKernelFunc )` condition. It prints the size of the parameter in bits, followed by a space and the parameter name. The `sz` variable is set to the size of the parameter in bits earlier in the code snippet." LLVM,NVPTX,430,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `case Instruction::GetElementPtr:`" LLVM,NVPTX,431,"The next statement in the code snippet is: O << << align << ; This statement is part of the `if` block that starts with `if ( isABI || isKernelFunc )`. It is printing the alignment of the parameter to the output stream `O`. The alignment is obtained from the `PAL` object using the `getParamAlignment` method, and the `DL` object using the `getABITypeAlignment` method. The alignment is then printed to the output stream `O` using the `<<` operator" LLVM,NVPTX,432,"Based on the code snippet provided, it appears to be a part of a function that is printing out information about a machine instruction. The function takes a `MachineInstruction` object as an argument and prints out information about its operands. The code snippet you provided is a `switch` statement that is checking the type of a `MachineOperand` object and printing out information about it based on its type. The `MachineOperand` object is obtained by calling the `getOperand` method on a `MachineInstruction` object with a specific operand number. Based on the code you provided" LLVM,NVPTX,433,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `ConvertFloatToBytes(ptr, float64);`" LLVM,NVPTX,434,"The next statement in this code snippet is: `if (TM.getTargetTriple().getOS() != Triple::NVCL) recordAndEmitFilenames(M);` This statement checks if the target triple's OS is not NVCL (NVIDIA CUDA) and if so, it calls the `recordAndEmitFilenames` function with the `M` module as an argument." LLVM,NVPTX,435,"The next statement in the code snippet is: `OutStreamer.AddBlankLine();`" LLVM,NVPTX,436,"Based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the next statement will be: `OutStreamer.EmitRawText(StringRef(M.getModuleInlineAsm()));` This statement will emit the module's inline assembly code to the output streamer." LLVM,NVPTX,437,"Based on the code snippet you provided, it appears that the next statement will be a case statement for the switch block. The switch block is checking the type of the variable `ETy` and based on that, it will execute different code for each type. The next case statement in the switch block is for the `StructTyID` type, so the next statement will be: ``` case Type::StructTyID: ``` This case statement will execute the code inside the block if the type of `ETy` is a structure type." LLVM,NVPTX,438,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `case Instruction::Add:`" LLVM,NVPTX,439,"Based on the code snippet provided, it is difficult to predict the next statement with certainty. However, based on the context and the information provided, it is likely that the next statement will be related to the handling of the `MachineOperand::MO_ExternalSymbol` case. The code snippet appears to be part of a function that prints operands for a machine instruction. The function takes a `MachineInstr` object, an operand number, a `raw_ostream` object, and a modifier string as input. The function uses a switch statement to handle different types of operands, and it appears" LLVM,NVPTX,440,"The next statement that will be executed is: `O << *getSymbol(GVar); return;` Explanation: The code snippet you provided is a part of a function that is trying to print a constant value. The function starts by checking if the constant value is a floating-point constant, and if so, it prints it using the `printFPConstant` function. If the constant value is not a floating-point constant, it checks if it is a null pointer, and if so, it prints the string """". If the constant value is not a null pointer," LLVM,NVPTX,441,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `Mang = new Mangler();` This statement creates a new instance of the `Mangler` class and assigns it to the `Mang` variable. The `Mangler` class is used for generating mangled names for symbols in the object file." LLVM,NVPTX,442,"Based on the code snippet you provided, it appears to be generating a string representation of a function parameter list. The code is using the LLVM API to get information about the function parameters and is generating a string that represents the parameter list in a specific format. The next statement in the code snippet is: O << << sz << ; This statement is appending a string to the output stream O, where the string is the size of the parameter in bits. The size is obtained by calling the getPrimitiveSizeInBits() method on" LLVM,NVPTX,443,"Based on the code snippet provided, it appears to be a part of a function that is generating a string representation of a parameter list for a function. The function takes a number of parameters, including a `Type` object, a `DataLayout` object, and a `PointerType` object. The function appears to be iterating over the parameters of the function and generating a string representation of each parameter. The string representation includes the parameter's name, type, and alignment. The code snippet you provided appears to be part of a `switch` statement that is handling the case where the parameter is a pointer" LLVM,NVPTX,444,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `O << ;` This is because the `switch` statement has ended, and the next statement after the `switch` block is the `O << ` statement." LLVM,NVPTX,445,"Based on the code snippet you provided, it appears to be a part of a function that is generating PTX (Parallel Thread Execution) code for the NVIDIA GPU. The function takes a `GVar` object and an `ETy` object as input, and it appears to be checking the alignment of the `GVar` object and printing out a string based on the alignment. The next statement of the code snippet you provided is: ``` O << << ( int ) DL . getPrefTypeAlignment ( ETy ) ; ```" LLVM,NVPTX,446,"The next statement of this code snippet is: return MCBinaryExpr::createAdd(LHS, RHS, Ctx);" LLVM,NVPTX,447,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `case Instruction::Trunc:` This is because the `switch` statement is checking the opcode of the constant expression `CE`, and the next opcode being checked is `Instruction::Trunc`." LLVM,NVPTX,448,"Based on the code snippet you provided, it appears to be a part of a function that is generating a string representation of a type. The code is checking the type of the variable `Ty` and generating a string based on its properties. The next statement of the code snippet you provided is: `O << << size << ;` This statement is appending a string literal to the `O` object, followed by the `size` variable, and then another string literal. The purpose of this statement is to generate a string representation of the" LLVM,NVPTX,449,"Based on the code snippet you provided, it appears to be a part of a function that is generating a string representation of a type. The function is taking a type as input and generating a string that represents the type's size in bits. The code snippet you provided is incomplete, so it's difficult to predict exactly what the next statement will be. However, based on the context of the code, it seems likely that the next statement will be another `if` statement that checks the type of the input `Ty` and generates a string representation of the type's size in bits based on the type's" LLVM,NVPTX,450,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `for (i = ; i < n; i++) global_list.insert(global_list.end(), gv_array[i]);` This is because the previous statement `bool ret = AsmPrinter::doFinalization(M);` is a function call, and the next statement after a function call is typically the next statement in the code." LLVM,NVPTX,451,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `i = 0;` Explanation: The code snippet is initializing an array of `GlobalVariable` pointers called `gv_array` with the elements of the `global_list` container. The `i` variable is used as an index into the `gv_array` array, and it is initialized to 0. The `for` loop that follows the initialization of `i` iterates over the elements of the `global_list` container and assigns each element to the corresponding element in the `gv_" LLVM,NVPTX,452,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `O << << MFI.getMaxAlignment() << << DEPOTNAME << getFunctionNumber() << << NumBytes << ;` This statement is printing the maximum alignment, the function number, and the number of bytes in the stack frame to the output stream `O`. The `` placeholders are used to insert string literals into the output stream." LLVM,NVPTX,453,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `case Type::PointerTyID:` This is because the code is currently processing a `PointerTyID` case, and the next statement after the `if` statement is the `case` statement for `PointerTyID`." LLVM,NVPTX,454,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `getAnalysisIfAvailable` and `AnalyzeModule` functions, as well as the `TargetLoweringObjectFile` and `Mangler` classes. However, based on the names of the functions and classes, it is likely that the next statement will be related to the initialization of the object file lowering and the mangling of the module. One possible next statement could be: ``` Mang->MangleModule(M); ``` This statement would m" LLVM,NVPTX,455,"Based on the code snippet you provided, it appears to be part of a function that is generating code for a LLVM module. The code is checking if the globals have been emitted, and if not, it is emitting them. It is then getting a reference to the register information and the function, and emitting a linkage directive for the function. The next statement is likely to be a call to the `emitFunction` function, which will generate the code for the function. The `emitFunction` function will take the function and the register information as arguments, and will generate the code for the function" LLVM,NVPTX,456,"Based on the code snippet you provided, it appears to be generating PTX (Parallel Thread Execution) code for the NVIDIA GPU architecture. The next statement is likely to be a call to the `emitPTXAddressSpace` function, which is responsible for emitting the address space of the PTX code. The function takes two arguments: the first is the address space of the PTX code, and the second is the output stream where the PTX code will be written. The next statement is likely to be a call to the `emitPTXAlignment` function, which is responsible for" LLVM,NVPTX,457,"It looks like the code is generating PTX (Parallel Thread Execution) code for a GPU. The code is using the `emitPTXAddressSpace` function to emit the address space of a pointer type, and the `getPTXFundamentalTypeStr` function to get the fundamental type of a variable. Based on the code snippet, it is difficult to predict the next statement with certainty, as it depends on the specific values of the variables and the implementation of the functions being called. However, some possible next statements could be: * `O << " LLVM,NVPTX,458,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `if (const ConstantDataSequential * CDS = dyn_cast(CPV)) {` This is because the `if` statement checks whether `CPV` is a `ConstantDataSequential` object, and if it is, it casts it to a `ConstantDataSequential` pointer and assigns it to `CDS`. If `CPV` is not a `ConstantDataSequential` object, the `if` statement will not be executed and the code will continue to the" LLVM,NVPTX,459,"The next statement in this code snippet is: `OutStreamer.EmitRawText(OS2.str());` This statement is emitting the raw text of the `OS2` stream to the output streamer." LLVM,NVPTX,460,"The next statement after the given code snippet is: `emitDeclarations(M, OS2);` This is because the `emitDeclarations` function is called with the `M` module and the `OS2` output stream as arguments. The `OS2` output stream is created by the `raw_svector_ostream` constructor, which takes a `SmallString` object as an argument. The `SmallString` object is created by the `SmallString` constructor, which takes a string literal as an argument. The string literal is ``," LLVM,NVPTX,461,"Based on the code snippet provided, it appears to be a part of a larger function that is generating some kind of output based on the parameters of a function. The code is using the LLVM API to access information about the function and its parameters. The next statement of the code snippet is likely to be a continuation of the `if` statement that checks whether the parameter has the `ByVal` attribute. If the parameter does not have the `ByVal` attribute, the code will enter the `else` block and print the parameter name. Therefore, the next statement of the code snippet is likely to be" LLVM,NVPTX,462,"Based on the code snippet provided, it appears to be generating a string representation of a function signature. The code is using the LLVM API to get information about the function and its parameters, and is then printing out the name of the function, the type of each parameter, and other information about the function. The next statement of the code snippet is likely to be the continuation of the if-else statement that was started earlier in the code. The code is checking if the parameter has the ""ByVal"" attribute, and if so, it is printing out the size of the parameter in bits. If the parameter does not" LLVM,NVPTX,463,"Based on the code snippet, it appears to be generating a string representation of a variable's type and alignment. The next statement is likely to be a continuation of this process, possibly printing the variable's type and alignment to a stream. The code is using the `emitPTXAddressSpace` function to print the address space of the variable's type, and then checking if the variable's alignment is equal to a specific value (represented by ``). If it is, the code prints the preferred type alignment for the variable's element type (using `TD->" LLVM,NVPTX,464,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `const FunctionType * FTy = dyn_cast < FunctionType > ( Ty ) ;` This line is checking if the type `Ty` is a function type, and if so, it casts it to a `FunctionType` pointer. If the type is not a function type, the next statement will be executed, which is: `return TD -> getPrefTypeAlignment ( Ty ) ;` This line returns the preferred alignment of the type `Ty`, which is a member function of the `Type` class." LLVM,NVPTX,465,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `unsigned sz = elemtype.getSizeInBits();`. This statement is part of the `for` loop that iterates over the elements of the vector type `Ty`. The loop variable `i` is used to index into the `vtparts` vector, which contains the element types of the vector. The `elemtype` variable is assigned the element type at index `i`, and the `elems` variable is assigned the number of elements in the vector. The `sz` variable is assigned the size in bits of the element type." LLVM,NVPTX,466,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `unsigned sz = elemtype.getSizeInBits();`. This statement is part of the `for` loop that iterates over the elements of the vector type `vtparts`. The loop variable `i` is used to index into `vtparts` and retrieve the element type at that position. The `elemtype` variable is then used to call the `getSizeInBits()` method to get the size of the element type in bits. The `sz` variable is then used to store the size of the element type." LLVM,NVPTX,467,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `case Type::PointerTyID:`." LLVM,NVPTX,468,"Based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the next statement will be: O << << ( int ) getOpenCLAlignment ( TD , ETy ) << ; This is because the previous statement ended with a `continue` statement, which skips the rest of the loop and goes to the next iteration. Therefore, the next statement will be the beginning of the next iteration of the loop." LLVM,NVPTX,469,"Based on the code snippet you provided, it appears to be a part of a function that is printing out information about a data structure. The function is taking a variable `ETy` as input, and it is checking the type of `ETy` using a switch statement. Based on the information provided, it is difficult to predict the next statement of the code snippet with certainty. However, based on the context and the structure of the code, it is likely that the next statement will be another case in the switch statement, or it could be the end of the switch statement and the start of a new block" LLVM,NVPTX,470,"The next statement in the code snippet is: `const MCExpr * RHS = lowerConstantForGV(CE->getOperand(1), ProcessingGeneric);`" LLVM,NVPTX,471,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty because the behavior of the code depends on the values of the variables and the functions called, which are not provided. However, based on the code snippet, it appears that the next statement will be a loop that iterates over the elements of the vector `vtparts` and prints out the size of each element in bits. The loop will also print out the index of the element and a string literal." LLVM,NVPTX,472,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `case Instruction::AddrSpaceCast:` This is because the code is currently inside a `switch` statement that is checking the opcode of the `ConstantExpr` object `CE`. The `AddrSpaceCast` opcode is one of the cases that is being checked, and the code will execute the statements inside this case if the opcode matches." LLVM,NVPTX,473,"The next statement in this code snippet is: `case Instruction::AddrSpaceCast:` This is because the `switch` statement is currently evaluating the `Instruction` enum value of the `CE` object, and the next value in the `Instruction` enum after `Instruction::AddrSpaceCast` is `Instruction::AddrSpaceCast`." LLVM,NVPTX,474,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it appears to be part of a larger program and the context is not provided. However, based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the next statement will be a `break` statement, as the previous `case` statement is not terminated with a `break` or `return` statement. It is also worth noting that the code snippet appears to be using the `switch` statement to handle different cases based on the value of `MachineOperand`. The `case` statements are used to match the value of `MachineOper" LLVM,NVPTX,475,"Based on the code snippet you provided, it appears to be a part of a function that is responsible for printing out the operands of a machine instruction. The function takes a `MachineOperand` object and an output stream as inputs, and it prints out the operand in a human-readable format. The code snippet you provided is from a `switch` statement that handles different types of machine operands. The next statement in the code snippet is: ``` case MachineOperand::MO_ExternalSymbol: { const char *symbname = MO.getSymbolName(); if" LLVM,NVPTX,476,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `Bytes = TD->getStructLayout(ST)->getElementOffset(i) + TD->getTypeAllocSize(ST) - TD->getStructLayout(ST)->getElementOffset(i);` This statement is assigning a value to the `Bytes` variable, which is the size of the `i`-th element of the struct. The calculation is done using the `getElementOffset` method of the `StructLayout` class, which returns the offset of the element in the struct, and the `getTypeAllocSize` method of the" LLVM,NVPTX,477,"This code snippet is part of a function that appears to be handling the case where the `CPV` object is a constant struct. The function is iterating over the operands of the struct and calling a function called `bufferLEByte` on each operand. The `bufferLEByte` function is not defined in the code snippet provided, so it is not possible to determine exactly what it does. However, based on the name of the function and the arguments it is being called with, it appears to be a function that is responsible for buffering the bytes of a constant struct. The function is taking the oper" LLVM,NVPTX,478,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `GlobalsEmitted = false;`" LLVM,NVPTX,479,The next statement after the `if` block is `OutStreamer.EmitRawText(StringRef(M.getModuleInlineAsm()));`. LLVM,NVPTX,480,"Based on the code snippet provided, it appears to be a part of a function that is generating a string representation of a function parameter. The function is checking the type of the parameter and generating a string based on its type. The next statement of the code snippet is likely to be: O << << sz << ; This statement is generating a string representation of the size of the parameter, which is likely to be used in the function signature. The placeholders are likely to be replaced with actual string literals that" LLVM,NVPTX,481,"Based on the code snippet provided, it appears to be generating PTX (Parallel Thread Execution) code for a GPU. The code is using the LLVM IR (Intermediate Representation) to generate PTX code. The next statement of the code snippet is likely to be: O << << getPTXFundamentalTypeStr(ETy) << << *getSymbol(GVar); This statement is generating a string that represents the type of the variable being declared. The placeholders are" LLVM,NVPTX,482,"Based on the code snippet you provided, it appears to be generating a string representation of a data type. The code is using the LLVM IR library to generate the string representation. The next statement of the code snippet is: O << << * getSymbol ( GVar ) << ; This statement is appending a string literal to the output stream O, followed by the result of the getSymbol() function called with the argument GVar, and then another string literal. The purpose of this statement is to generate a string representation of the data type" LLVM,NVPTX,483,"Based on the code snippet you provided, it appears to be a part of a function that is generating a string representation of a type. The function takes a type `Ty` as input and generates a string representation of the type based on its properties. The code snippet you provided appears to be the beginning of the function, where it checks if the type `Ty` is a floating-point or integer type. If it is, it generates a string representation of the type's size in bits. If it is not, it checks if the type is a pointer type, and if so, it generates a string representation of" LLVM,NVPTX,484,"Based on the code snippet you provided, it appears to be a part of a function that is generating a string representation of a type. The function is taking a type as input and is generating a string that describes the type. The code snippet you provided is not complete, so it's difficult to predict the next statement with certainty. However, based on the context, it seems likely that the next statement will be a call to a function that generates the string representation of the type. The function will likely take the type as input and will generate a string that describes the type, including its size, alignment, and other" LLVM,NVPTX,485,"Based on the code snippet you provided, it appears to be generating PTX (Parallel Thread Execution) code for a GPU. The code is using the LLVM API to generate PTX instructions for a global variable. The next statement of the code snippet is likely to be a case statement that handles the different types of data that the global variable can hold. The case statement will likely have cases for different data types such as integers, floating-point numbers, and structures. Inside each case, the code will generate PTX instructions to handle the specific data type. For example, for integers, the code" LLVM,NVPTX,486,"The next statement of this code snippet is: O << << ( int ) TD -> getPrefTypeAlignment ( ETy );" LLVM,NVPTX,487,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return MCBinaryExpr::Create(CE->getOpcode(), LHS, RHS, Ctx);` This statement creates a new `MCBinaryExpr` object with the opcode of the constant expression `CE`, the lowered constant expressions for the left-hand side (LHS) and right-hand side (RHS) operands, and the context `Ctx`. The `Create` method is a static method of the `MCBinaryExpr` class that creates a new `MCBinaryExpr` object with the given opcode, operands" LLVM,NVPTX,488,"The next statement in this code snippet is: `GlobalsEmitted = false;`" LLVM,NVPTX,489,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be: `return true;` The `doInitialization` function is a member function of the `AsmPrinter` class, and it is responsible for initializing the printer for the current module. The function returns a `bool` value indicating whether the initialization was successful. In the code snippet you provided, the function first initializes a few local variables, including `Str1`, `OS1`, `MMI`, `Mang`, and `OutStreamer`. It then calls the `AnalyzeModule` function on the `Machine" LLVM,NVPTX,490,"It's difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet because it appears to be incomplete. The snippet is a switch statement with a large number of cases, but it's not clear what the statement is supposed to do or what the cases are supposed to represent. Without more context, it's not possible to determine the next statement. If you provide more information about the code snippet, such as the language it's written in, the purpose of the code, or any relevant details, I may be able to provide a more helpful answer." LLVM,NVPTX,491,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `for (int i = 0; i < Num; ++i) { buffer[curpos] = Ptr[i]; curpos++; }` This is the first iteration of the outer loop, which initializes the `buffer` array with the values from the `Ptr` array. The loop will continue until `i` is equal to `Num`, at which point the second loop will start." LLVM,NVPTX,492,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the context and the specific implementation of the `symbolPosInBuffer`, `Symbols`, and `SymbolsBeforeStripping` variables. However, based on the code provided, it is likely that the next statement will be another assignment or a method call that uses one of these variables. Here are a few possibilities: * `symbolPosInBuffer.push_back(curpos)`: This would add the current position to the `symbolPosInBuffer` vector. * `Symbols.push" LLVM,NVPTX,493,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `buffer[curpos] = ;` This is because the `for` loop is iterating over the elements of the `buffer` array, and the current position `curpos` is being incremented by 1 in each iteration. The statement `buffer[curpos] = ;` assigns the value `` to the element of the `buffer` array at the current position `curpos`." LLVM,NVPTX,494,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `Bytes = CPV->getNumOperands() * sizeof(Constant*);` This is because the code is checking if `CPV` is a `ConstantArray` or `ConstantVector`, and if it is, it is iterating over the operands and calling `bufferLEByte` on each one. The `Bytes` variable is being set to the number of operands times the size of a `Constant*` pointer." LLVM,NVPTX,495,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of the code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `gv` object and the `getType` and `getAddressSpace` methods. However, based on the names of the methods and the context of the code, it is likely that the next statement will be a check for the linkage of the function pointer `oneFunc`. Here is a possible next statement: ``` if (oneFunc->hasInternalLinkage()) return false; ``` This statement checks if the function pointer `oneFunc` has internal linkage," LLVM,NVPTX,496,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `p[i] = (unsigned char) *vp;` This statement assigns the value of `*vp` to the `i`-th element of the array `p`, casting it to an `unsigned char` first." LLVM,NVPTX,497,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `i += ;` Explanation: The code snippet is a for loop that iterates over the elements of an array. The loop variable `i` is initialized to ``, which is a constant value. The loop continues until `i` is greater than or equal to `sizeof(int64_t)`, which is the size of an `int64_t` type in bytes. In each iteration of the loop, `i` is incremented by `` bits using the `>>=` operator." LLVM,NVPTX,500,"The next statement of this code snippet is: p[i] = (unsigned char)vp; Explanation: The code snippet is a loop that iterates over the elements of an array `p` and assigns the value of `vp` to each element. The value of `vp` is shifted right by `NUM_LIT` bits at each iteration. The loop continues until the end of the array is reached. The next statement of the code snippet is the assignment of the value of `vp` to the current element of the array `p" LLVM,NVPTX,501,"The code snippet you provided is a part of a function that is iterating over the operands of a `User` object, which is a subclass of `Value` in the LLVM library. The function is checking if the operand is a `GlobalVariable` and if so, it is inserting it into a set called `Globals`. Based on the code snippet you provided, the next statement is likely to be: ``` const Value *V = U->getOperand(i); ``` This line of code is getting the `i`-th operand of the `User`" LLVM,NVPTX,502,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `for (i = ; i < n; i++) global_list.insert(global_list.end(), gv_array[i]);` Explanation: The code snippet you provided is a part of a function that appears to be related to the LLVM compiler infrastructure. It is initializing a global variable array `gv_array` and then inserting the elements of this array into a list called `global_list`. The `` placeholder is likely a constant value that represents the" LLVM,NVPTX,503,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `OutStreamer->AddComment();` Explanation: The code snippet is part of a function called `doInitialization` in a class called `AsmPrinter`. The function is initializing various components of the assembler, such as the target machine, the module, and the output streamer. The last statement executed in the code snippet is `OutStreamer->EmitRawText(OS1.str());`, which emits the raw text of the output streamer to the output file." LLVM,NVPTX,504,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `OutStreamer->AddComment();` This statement adds a comment to the output streamer, using the string literal `` as the comment text." LLVM,NVPTX,505,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `EmitAlignment(NumBits, GV);`" LLVM,NVPTX,506,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `EmitAlignment(NumBits, GV);`" LLVM,NVPTX,507,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `AsmPrinter::EmitBasicBlockStart(MBB);`" LLVM,NVPTX,508,"It looks like the code snippet is trying to print out a function signature, with the function name and parameters. Based on the syntax, it appears to be using a template metaprogramming library. The next statement is likely to be: ``` O << ; ``` This statement is appending a string literal to the output stream `O`. The string literal is likely to be the function name or a parameter name. It's difficult to predict the exact output without knowing the specific implementation of the `getSymbol` and `emitFunctionParamList` functions," LLVM,NVPTX,509,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `emitDeclaration(F, O);`" LLVM,NVPTX,510,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `const Function *F = FI;`" LLVM,NVPTX,511,"The next statement of this code snippet is: O << ; Explanation: The code snippet is a part of a function named `emitDemotedVars` that is defined in the `AsmPrinter` class. The function takes two parameters: a `const Function *` named `f` and a `raw_ostream &` named `O`. The function first checks if the `localDecls` map contains an entry for the function `f`. If it does not, the function returns. If the `localDecls" LLVM,NVPTX,512,"Based on the code snippet provided, it is difficult to predict the next statement with certainty. However, based on the context and the patterns in the code, it is likely that the next statement will be related to the emission of the function body. The code snippet appears to be part of a function that is responsible for printing the body of a function. The function is called `EmitFunctionBodyStart` and it is a member of a class called `AsmPrinter`. The function appears to be clearing the register mapping and emitting some raw text to the output streamer. It then calls a function called" LLVM,NVPTX,513,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of the code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `emitFunction` function and the data structures being used. However, based on the context of the code snippet, it appears that the next statement is likely to be a call to the `print` function, passing in the `O` object and the `MAI` object as arguments." LLVM,NVPTX,514,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `getFunction()` method and the state of the `MF` object. However, based on the name of the method and the fact that it is being called on an object named `MF`, it is likely that the next statement will be a call to a function or method that is defined in the `MF` object." LLVM,NVPTX,515,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the `emitImplicitDef` function depends on the specific implementation of the `AsmPrinter` class and the input machine instruction `MI`. However, based on the name of the function and the fact that it is called with a `const MachineInstr*` argument, it is likely that the function will generate some kind of implicit definition for the instruction `MI`. This could involve emitting a specific assembly code sequence, updating some internal state of the `AsmPrinter` object, or performing some other operation that" LLVM,NVPTX,516,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `if ( specified ) O << << mincta << ;` This is because the previous `if` statement has an `else` clause that sets `specified` to `true` if any of the `llvm::getMaxNTID*` functions return a non-zero value. If `specified` is still `true` after the previous `if` statement, then the next statement to be executed will be the one inside the `if ( specified )` block, which is the" LLVM,NVPTX,517,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `if (filenameMap.find(fileName) == filenameMap.end()) return;` This statement checks if the `fileName` is present in the `filenameMap` map. If it is not present, the function returns. If it is present, the function continues to execute the next statement." LLVM,NVPTX,518,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `O << ;` This is because the code is checking if `V` has an initializer, and if it does, it will print ``. If `V` does not have an initializer, it will print ``." LLVM,NVPTX,519,"Based on the code snippet you provided, it seems that the next statement will be: `O << ""shared""; break;` This is because the `case` statement for `llvm::ADDRESS_SPACE_SHARED` is not followed by a `break` statement, so the code will continue executing the next statement, which is the `O << ""shared"";` statement." LLVM,NVPTX,520,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty because it depends on the specific values of the variables and the behavior of the functions called. However, we can make some educated guesses based on the information provided. The code snippet appears to be part of a larger program that is generating assembly code for a specific architecture. The `ElementSize` variable is initialized to a specific value, and the `switch` statement checks the type of the `ETy` variable. If the type is a struct, array, or vector, the `ElementSize` variable is set to the size of the" LLVM,NVPTX,521,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `temp << reader->readLine(line);` This statement reads a line from the file using the `readLine` method of the `reader` object, and appends it to the `temp` string. The `readLine` method returns the next line of the file as a string, which is then appended to `temp`." LLVM,NVPTX,522,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `O << getVirtualRegisterName(vr);` This statement is emitting the virtual register name to the output stream `O`. The `getVirtualRegisterName` function is called with the virtual register number `vr` as an argument, and the resulting name is then emitted to the output stream." LLVM,NVPTX,523,The next statement after `return theFileName ;` would be the end of the function. LLVM,NVPTX,524,"The next statement of this code snippet is: AU.setPreservesAll();" LLVM,NVPTX,525,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific values of the variables and the behavior of the functions being called. However, based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the next statement will be a `return` statement, as the `case` statement is checking the value of `Type` and returning a string literal based on that value. The first `case` statement checks if `Type` is equal to `DoubleTyID`, and if so, returns the string literal ``. The second `case` statement checks if `" LLVM,NVPTX,526,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `unsigned NumBits = cast < IntegerType > ( Ty ) -> getBitWidth ( ) ;` This line of code is casting the `Ty` variable to an `IntegerType` and then calling the `getBitWidth()` method on it to get the number of bits in the integer type. The result of this expression is stored in the `NumBits` variable." LLVM,NVPTX,527,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `reader->readLine(line);` This is because the `if` statement checks if the `fileName` method of the `reader` object returns a value that is not equal to the `filename` variable. If the values are not equal, the `reader` object is deleted and a new `LineReader` object is created with the `filename` as its argument. Then, the `readLine` method of the new `reader` object is called with the `line` variable as its argument." LLVM,NVPTX,528,"The next statement after the `if` block will be the statement following the `if` block, which is: `return reader -> readLine ( ) ;`" LLVM,NVPTX,529,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be: `return Expr;` This is because the `GetSymbolRef` function is expected to return a `const MCExpr *` object, which is the type of `Expr`. The `Expr` variable is assigned the result of the `MCSymbolRefExpr::create` function, which is a `const MCExpr *` object. Therefore, the next statement is likely to be a return statement that returns the `Expr` object." LLVM,NVPTX,530,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `GetSymbolRef` method and the context in which it is being called. However, based on the name of the method and the parameters it takes, it is likely that the next statement will involve retrieving a reference to a symbol in the assembly code, possibly using the `Symbol` parameter as a key or identifier." LLVM,NVPTX,531,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `unsigned MappedVR = VI->second;` This statement assigns the value of the second element of the `std::pair` pointed to by `VI` to the variable `MappedVR`. The `VI->second` expression is used to access the second element of the `std::pair`, which is the `unsigned` value that was mapped to the key `Reg` in the `DenseMap`." LLVM,NVPTX,532,The next statement after the `switch` block is `return false;`. LLVM,NVPTX,533,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the `isImageType` function depends on the specific implementation of the `AsmPrinter` class and the input type `Ty`. However, based on the name of the function and the fact that it takes a `Type *` argument, it is likely that the function checks whether the input type is an image type, and returns `true` if it is and `false` otherwise. Therefore, a possible next statement of this code snippet could be: ``` if (isImageType" LLVM,NVPTX,534,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `MachineBasicBlock` class and the data stored in the `MBB` object. However, based on the code snippet you provided, it appears that the next statement after the `for` loop will be the body of the loop, which is executed for each predecessor `PMBB` of the `MBB` object. Within the loop body, the code snippet is using the `PMBB` pointer to access the predecessor basic block, and then performing some" LLVM,NVPTX,535,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `const MachineBasicBlock * PMBB = * I ;` This line is assigning the value of the current predecessor basic block to the variable `PMBB`. The `pred_begin()` and `pred_end()` functions are used to iterate over the predecessors of the current basic block, and the `*` operator is used to dereference the iterator and get the basic block pointer." LLVM,NVPTX,536,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific values of the variables and the implementation of the `fstr` class. However, based on the code provided, it is likely that the next statement will be a call to the `open` method of the `fstr` class, passing in the value of the `filename` variable as an argument." LLVM,NVPTX,537,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the code depends on the input file and the specific implementation of the `LineReader` class. However, based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the next statement will be to read the next line from the input file and store it in the `theCurLine` variable." LLVM,NVPTX,538,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be a call to the `LLVMInitializeAsmPrinter` function, which is a part of the LLVM library. The `LLVMInitializeAsmPrinter` function is responsible for initializing the assembly printer for the specified instruction set architecture (ISA). The `LLVMInitializeAsmPrinter` function is a template function that takes a single argument, which is the name of the ISA for which the assembly printer should be initialized. The function is called with the name of the ISA as" LLVM,NVPTX,539,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `case Instruction::AddrSpaceCast:` This is because the `switch` statement is checking the opcode of the `ConstantExpr` object `CE`, and the `AddrSpaceCast` opcode is one of the possible values that can be returned by the `getOpcode()` method. The `switch` statement will execute the code inside the `case Instruction::AddrSpaceCast:` block if the opcode of `CE` is `AddrSpaceCast`." LLVM,NVPTX,540,"Based on the code snippet you provided, it appears that the next statement will be: `if ( OpNo == && MO . isImm ( ) ) { lowerImageHandleSymbol ( MO . getImm ( ) , MCOp ) ; return true ; }` This is because the code is checking if the current operand is an immediate value, and if it is, it will call the `lowerImageHandleSymbol` function with the immediate value as an argument. The function will then return `true` if the symbol was successfully lowered, or `false` otherwise" LLVM,NVPTX,541,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `getManagedStrPool` and `getManagedString` methods, as well as the value of the `Sym` variable. However, based on the names of the methods and the fact that they are being called on a `std::string` pointer, it is likely that the next statement will be a call to the `std::string` constructor or a method that operates on the `std::string` object. For example, the next statement could be: ```" LLVM,NVPTX,542,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the functions being called and the data being processed. However, based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the next statement will be: `MCOp = GetSymbolRef(OutContext.getOrCreateSymbol(StringRef(SymNamePtr->c_str())));` This statement is assigning the result of the `GetSymbolRef` function to the `MCOp` variable, using the `OutContext` object to get or create a symbol with the name specified by the" LLVM,NVPTX,543,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `case MachineOperand::MO_Immediate: MCOp = MCOperand::createImm(MO.getImm()); break;` This is because the `switch` statement is checking the type of the `MachineOperand` object, and the `MO_Immediate` case is the next one that has not been handled yet. The `createImm` method is called on the `MCOperand` object to create a new immediate operand with the value of the immediate operand in the `MachineOperand` object" LLVM,NVPTX,544,"Based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the next statement will be: case MachineOperand::MO_FPImmediate: This is because the previous case statement (case MachineOperand::MO_GlobalAddress) falls through to this case statement, and the code snippet does not contain any other case statements that would be executed before this one. Additionally, the code snippet contains a switch statement within the case MachineOperand::MO_FPImmediate block, which suggests that the next statement will be a case statement within that switch statement." LLVM,NVPTX,545,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `if (MO.isReg() && MO.getReg() == NVPTX::ImageHandleReg) {`" LLVM,NVPTX,546,"Based on the code snippet provided, it is difficult to predict the next statement with certainty as it depends on various factors such as the input data, the machine architecture, and the specific implementation of the code. However, based on the information provided, it is possible to make some educated guesses about the next statement. The code snippet appears to be related to the generation of assembly code for a specific target machine. The `nextSymbolPos` variable is initialized to the position of the next symbol in the buffer, and the `nBytes` variable is set to the number of bytes to be printed. The `if`" LLVM,NVPTX,547,"The next statement in the code snippet is: O << ']' ; Explanation: The code snippet is a part of a function called PrintAsmMemoryOperand, which is responsible for printing a memory operand in assembly code. The function takes several parameters, including a pointer to a machine instruction (MI), the operand number (OpNo), and a raw output stream (O). The function first checks if the ExtraCode parameter is non-null and if the character at position in the ExtraCode string is non-zero. If" LLVM,NVPTX,548,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `O << ExtraCode;` This is because the `if` statement checks if `ExtraCode` is not null and if the character at index `` in `ExtraCode` is not null. If both conditions are true, then the `O` stream is written to with the contents of `ExtraCode`." LLVM,NVPTX,549,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return AsmPrinter::PrintAsmOperand(MI, OpNo, AsmVariant, ExtraCode, O);` This is because the `switch` statement is checking the value of `ExtraCode[]` and if it is not equal to `'r'`, it will execute the `default` case, which is to return the result of `AsmPrinter::PrintAsmOperand(MI, OpNo, AsmVariant, ExtraCode, O)`." LLVM,NVPTX,550,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific input and the behavior of the `llvm_unreachable` function. However, based on the code snippet, it appears that the next statement will be: `O << lead;` This is because the `llvm_unreachable` function is called with a string literal as an argument, and the `utohexstr` function is called on the result of the `bitcastToAPInt` function. The `utohexstr` function converts the value to a hexade" LLVM,NVPTX,551,"Based on the code snippet provided, it seems that the next statement will be: case MCExpr::Binary: { const MCBinaryExpr &BE = cast(Expr); if (isa(BE.getLHS()) || isa(BE.getLHS()) || isaGenericMCSymbolRefExpr>(BE.getLHS())) { printMCExpr(*BE.getLHS(), OS); } else { OS << '(';" LLVM,NVPTX,552,"Based on the code snippet you provided, it appears to be a part of a function that is printing out the operands of a machine instruction. The function takes a machine instruction (`MI`) and an operand number (`opNum`) as input, and it is checking whether the operand is an immediate value and if it is equal to a specific value (``). If the operand is an immediate value and it is equal to ``, the function returns. Otherwise, it prints out the operand using the `printOperand` function. Therefore, the next" LLVM,NVPTX,553,"Based on the code snippet you provided, it appears to be a part of a function that is checking the operands of a machine instruction. The function is checking if a specific operand is a immediate value and if it is equal to a certain value. The next statement of the code snippet you provided is: `if (MI->getOperand(opNum + ).isImm() && MI->getOperand(opNum + ).getImm() == ) return;` This statement is checking if" LLVM,NVPTX,554,"Based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the next statement will be: `O << DEPOTNAME << getFunctionNumber(MO.getReg());` This is because the previous `if` statement checks if the register is a physical register and if it is equal to ``. If both conditions are true, then the code inside the `if` statement will be executed, which includes printing the register name using the `getRegisterName` method. Therefore, the next statement is likely to be printing the register name using the `getRegisterName` method," LLVM,NVPTX,555,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `getFunction()` method and the state of the `MF` object. However, based on the name of the method and the fact that it is being called on an object named `MF`, it is likely that the next statement will be a call to a function or method that is defined in the `MF` object." LLVM,NVPTX,556,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `AsmPrinter` class and the `MachineFunction` class. However, based on the name of the method and the parameters it takes, it is likely that the next statement will be related to printing the return value of the function. One possible next statement could be: `O << ""Return value: "" << F->getReturnValue()->getType()->getAsString();`, which would print the return type of the function. Alternatively, it" LLVM,NVPTX,557,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `llvm_unreachable();` Explanation: The code snippet is a part of a function that is handling the printing of a constant expression. The function first checks if the constant expression is a pointer type, and if it is, it strips the pointer casts and checks if the address space is non-generic. If the address space is non-generic, it prints the symbol for the global variable. If the address space is generic, it lower the constant and prints the symbol for the global variable" LLVM,NVPTX,558,"The next statement of the code snippet is: `if (const GlobalValue *GVar = dyn_cast(v)) {`" LLVM,NVPTX,559,"Based on the code snippet you provided, it appears to be a part of a function that is checking the value of a variable `Imm` and performing different actions based on its value. The first `if` statement checks if `Imm` is less than a certain value or greater than another certain value. If this condition is true, it outputs a string literal to the stream `O`. The second `if` statement checks if `Imm` is equal to a certain value. If this condition is true, it checks if `Imm` is less than another certain value. If this condition is" LLVM,NVPTX,560,"Based on the code snippet you provided, it appears to be a part of a function that is checking the value of a variable `Modifier` and performing different actions based on its value. The first `if` statement checks if `Modifier` is equal to a specific string literal, and if it is, it performs some action. The second `if` statement checks if `Modifier` is equal to a different string literal, and if it is, it performs a different action. The third `if` statement checks if `Modifier` is equal to a third string literal, and if it is, it" LLVM,NVPTX,561,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `fstr.getline(buff, );` This statement reads a line from the file stream `fstr` into the buffer `buff`, where `` is a placeholder for a numerical literal that represents the maximum number of characters to read. The `getline` function returns the number of characters read, which is then stored in the variable `theCurLine`." LLVM,NVPTX,562,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `filenameMap[Filename] = i;` Explanation: The code snippet is a part of a function named `recordAndEmitFilenames` that is defined in the `AsmPrinter` class. The function is responsible for recording and emitting filenames in the debug information of a module. The function first creates an instance of the `DebugInfoFinder` class and calls its `processModule` method to process the debug information of the module. The function then iterates over the compile units in" LLVM,NVPTX,563,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be a call to a function that takes a pointer to a subtarget as an argument. The function is likely to be a member of the `nvptx` class, and it is likely to be used to perform some operation on the subtarget. Without more context, it is difficult to provide a more specific prediction. Can you provide more information about the code snippet, such as the surrounding code or the purpose of the function being called?" LLVM,NVPTX,564,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be: `nvptxSubtarget->setMachineFunction(F);` This is because the `runOnMachineFunction` method is typically used to perform some action on the `MachineFunction` object, and the `setMachineFunction` method is a common way to set the `MachineFunction` object for a given subtarget. It's worth noting that the exact behavior of this code snippet will depend on the specific implementation of the `runOnMachineFunction` method in the `MachineFunction` class, as well as the specific implementation" LLVM,NVPTX,565,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `const TargetRegisterClass * RC = TRI -> getRegClass ( i ) ;` This line retrieves the `TargetRegisterClass` object for the current register class index `i`. The `getRegClass` method is called on the `TRI` object, which is an instance of the `TargetRegisterInfo` class. The `TargetRegisterClass` object is then stored in the `RC` variable." LLVM,NVPTX,566,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `for (unsigned int i = ; i < numVRs; i++) {` This line is the start of a for loop that iterates over the virtual registers in the target machine. The loop variable `i` is initialized to ``, which is a placeholder for a literal value that is not specified in the code snippet. The loop continues until `i` is greater than or equal to the number of virtual registers in the target machine, which is stored in the variable `numVRs`." LLVM,NVPTX,567,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the context in which the code is being executed. However, based on the syntax and the fact that the code is inside a function, it is likely that the next statement will be the start of a new block of code, such as an `if` statement or a `while` loop." LLVM,NVPTX,568,"The next statement after the `if (usedInGlobalVarDef(C))` statement is `return true;`. The `usedInGlobalVarDef` function checks if the constant `C` is used in the definition of a global variable. If it is, the function returns `true`, which means that the constant is used in a global variable definition. Therefore, the next statement after the `if (usedInGlobalVarDef(C))` statement is `return true;`, which returns `true` if the constant is used in a global variable definition. If the constant is not used in a global" LLVM,NVPTX,569,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `const BasicBlock * curBB = instr->getParent();`" LLVM,NVPTX,570,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `const Function * callee = I->getCalledFunction();`" LLVM,NVPTX,571,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `Visiting.erase(GV);` Explanation: The `Visiting` set is used to keep track of the global variables that are currently being visited. The `erase` method is used to remove the `GV` variable from the `Visiting` set once it has been visited. This ensures that the `Visiting` set only contains global variables that have not yet been visited." LLVM,NVPTX,572,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the code depends on the input and the specific implementation of the `LineReader` class. However, based on the name of the class and the fact that it is being instantiated, it is likely that the next statement will involve reading a line of input from the user." LLVM,NVPTX,573,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the code is dependent on the specific inputs and environment in which it is executed. However, based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the `AsmPrinter` function is being defined, and it is likely that the next statement will be the start of the function's implementation. Without more context, it is difficult to provide a more specific prediction of the next statement. If you have any additional information or context about the code, I would be happy to try and provide a more detailed prediction." LLVM,NVPTX,574,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return;`" LLVM,NVPTX,575,"The next statement after the `if` block will be the `return` statement, which will return the string representation of the `ValidNameStream` object." LLVM,NVPTX,576,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `GV` object and the `cleanUpName` function. However, based on the code provided, it is likely that the next statement will be: `GV.setName(cleanUpName(GV.getName()));` This statement sets the name of the `GV` object to the result of the `cleanUpName` function, which is called with the current name of the `GV` object as its argument. The `cleanUpName` function is likely to perform some" LLVM,NVPTX,577,"The next statement of this code snippet is: ValidNameStream << C;" LLVM,NVPTX,578,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be a return statement, as it is a common pattern in LLVM passes to return a new instance of the pass class at the end of the `create` function. Therefore, the next statement of this code snippet is likely to be: ``` return new AssignValidGlobalNames(); ``` This will return a new instance of the `ISA_LIT`AssignValidGlobalNames` pass, which can then be used to perform the actual optimization." LLVM,NVPTX,579,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the `AssignValidGlobalNames` method is not specified. However, based on the name of the method, it is likely that it assigns valid global names to some objects or variables. Without more information about the code, it is difficult to provide a more specific answer. If you have any additional context or details about the code, I would be happy to try and help you further." LLVM,NVPTX,580,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `void AssignValidGlobalNames::runOnModule(Module &M) {` This is the start of the `runOnModule` function, which is a member function of the `ModulePass` class. The `runOnModule` function is called by the LLVM optimizer to run the pass on a module. The function takes a `Module` object as an argument, which represents the module being optimized." LLVM,NVPTX,581,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `void AssignValidGlobalNames::runOnModule(Module &M) {` This is the start of the `runOnModule` function, which is a member function of the `ModulePass` class. The `runOnModule` function is called by the LLVM optimizer to run the pass on a module. The function takes a `Module` object as an argument, which represents the module being optimized." LLVM,NVPTX,582,"The next statement in this code snippet is: `for (Function &F : M.functions())` This line is starting a new loop that iterates over the functions in the module `M`. The loop variable `F` is a reference to a `Function` object, and the loop will execute the code inside the loop body for each function in the module." LLVM,NVPTX,583,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `GV` object and the `cleanUpName` function. However, based on the code provided, it is likely that the next statement will be: `GV.setName(cleanUpName(GV.getName()));` This statement sets the name of the `GV` object to the result of the `cleanUpName` function, which is called with the current name of the `GV` object as its argument. The `cleanUpName` function is likely to perform some" LLVM,NVPTX,584,"The next statement of this code snippet is: AU.setPreservesAll();" LLVM,NVPTX,585,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the `setPreservesCFG` method is not specified. However, based on the name of the method, it is likely that it sets a flag indicating whether the CFG (Control Flow Graph) of the program should be preserved during some operation. Without more context, it is not possible to determine what the next statement of this code snippet will be. It could be any statement that is executed after the `setPreservesCFG` method is called." LLVM,NVPTX,586,"return ""MyPass"";" LLVM,NVPTX,587,The next statement after `return ;` would be the end of the function. LLVM,NVPTX,588,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be the implementation of the `AtomicLower` function, which is a function pass that lowers atomic operations to a form that can be executed by the target machine. The function pass is defined as a subclass of the `FunctionPass` class, which is a base class for all function passes in the LLVM compiler infrastructure. The `AtomicLower` function is likely to be implemented as a series of steps that transform the input LLVM IR code to produce the lowered code. These steps may include: 1. Identifying and extracting the atomic" LLVM,NVPTX,589,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be the implementation of the `AtomicLower` function, which is a function pass that lowers atomic operations to a form that can be executed by the target machine. The function pass is defined as a subclass of the `FunctionPass` class, which is a base class for all function passes in the LLVM compiler infrastructure. The `AtomicLower` function is likely to be implemented as a series of steps that transform the input LLVM IR code to produce the lowered code. These steps may include: 1. Identifying and extracting the atomic" LLVM,NVPTX,590,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be the continuation of the `for` loop, which will iterate over the remaining instructions in the function `F`. Inside the loop, the code will check if the current instruction is an atomic read-modify-write instruction (RMW) and if it is accessing the local memory address space. If both conditions are true, the instruction will be added to the `LocalMemoryAtomics` vector. The loop will continue until all instructions in the function have been processed, and the `LocalMemoryAtomics` vector will contain all the atomic" LLVM,NVPTX,591,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet without knowing the context and the specific implementation of the functions being called. However, based on the names of the functions and the variables used, it appears that the code is performing some kind of optimization or transformation on a graph or a set of instructions. The first part of the code snippet appears to be checking if a certain condition is met, and if so, it is creating a new instruction and replacing all uses of the original instruction with the new one. The second part of the code snippet appears to be creating a new constant expression and replacing all uses of the original" LLVM,NVPTX,592,"The next statement after the `if` statement in the code snippet you provided is: `return false;` This statement is executed if the condition in the `if` statement is true, which means that the element type of the source type (`SrcTy`) is not equal to the element type of the destination type (`DestTy`). In this case, the function returns `false` to indicate that the types are not compatible." LLVM,NVPTX,593,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `hoistAddrSpaceCastFromGEP(GEP);` This is because the `if` statement that follows the `hoistAddrSpaceCastFromGEP` call is checking if the `Operator` object returned by `dyn_cast` is not null, and if it is not null, it will execute the `if` statement. Since the `hoistAddrSpaceCastFromGEP` call is not conditional, it will always be executed regardless of the outcome of the `if` statement." LLVM,NVPTX,594,"The next statement of this code snippet is: MI->setOperand(Idx, Cast->getOperand()); This statement is inside the if block that checks if the operand at index Idx is an eliminable address space cast. If the cast is eliminable, the statement sets the operand at index Idx to the operand of the cast, which is the result of the cast. The placeholder is a literal value that represents the index of the operand to be set." LLVM,NVPTX,595,"The next statement after the `if` block is the `else` block. Inside the `else` block, there is a `ConstantExpr` object named `NewGEPCE` that is created using the `getGetElementPtr` method of the `ConstantExpr` class. This method takes several arguments, including the type of the pointer being dereferenced, the constant expression that represents the pointer, and the indices of the elements being accessed. The `NewGEPCE` object is then used to create a new `AddrSpaceCastInst` object, which is used to" LLVM,NVPTX,596,"The next statement of the code snippet is: NewGEPCE = ConstantExpr :: getGetElementPtr ( GEP -> getSourceElementType ( ) , cast < Constant > ( Cast -> getOperand ( ) ) , Indices , GEP -> isInBounds ( ) ) ;" LLVM,NVPTX,597,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `if (Changed) return true;`" LLVM,NVPTX,598,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be: `if (I->getMetadata(""favor_non_generic"")) {` This is because the code is checking if the `LoadInst` instruction has a metadata node with the key ""favor_non_generic"". If it does, then the code will execute the instructions inside the `if` block." LLVM,NVPTX,599,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `if (Depth >= MaxDepth) return false;` This statement checks if the current depth of the recursion is greater than or equal to the maximum depth allowed. If it is, the function returns false, indicating that the address space cast cannot be hoisted." LLVM,NVPTX,600,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `if (Depth >= MaxDepth) return false;` This statement checks if the current depth of the recursion is greater than or equal to the maximum depth allowed. If it is, the function returns false, indicating that the address space cast cannot be hoisted." LLVM,NVPTX,601,"The next statement of the code snippet is: `Value *NewBC = new AddrSpaceCastInst(NewCast, BC->getType(), , BCI);` This statement creates a new `AddrSpaceCastInst` object, which is a subclass of `Instruction` that represents an address space cast instruction in the LLVM IR. The `NewCast` object is passed as the first argument, which is the value to be casted. The `BC->getType()` method is used to get the type of the `BC` object, which is the type of" LLVM,NVPTX,602,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `Value * NewBC = new AddrSpaceCastInst(NewCast, BC->getType(), , BCI);` This statement creates a new `AddrSpaceCastInst` object called `NewBC` using the `NewCast` value, the type of the original `BitCastInst` object `BC`, and a string literal. The `takeName` method is called on `NewBC` to give it the same name as the original `BitCastInst` object `BC`, and the `replaceAllUsesWith" LLVM,NVPTX,603,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `NewASC->takeName(GEP);` This statement takes the name of the `GEP` instruction and assigns it to the `NewASC` instruction." LLVM,NVPTX,604,"The next statement of the code snippet is: `Constant *NewGEP = ConstantExpr::getGetElementPtr(GEP->getSourceElementType(), cast(Cast->getOperand()), Indices, GEP->isInBounds());` This statement is creating a new `Constant` object using the `ConstantExpr::getGetElementPtr` method. The method takes the source element type of the `GEP` instruction, the constant operand of the `Cast` instruction, the `Indices` array, and a boolean" LLVM,NVPTX,605,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `dyn_cast` and `setOperand` functions, as well as the values of the variables `MI`, `Idx`, and ``. However, based on the names of the functions and variables, it is likely that the next statement will be a call to the `setOperand` function, passing in the result of the `dyn_cast` operation as the second argument. The `dyn_cast` operation is likely to return a" LLVM,NVPTX,606,"The next statement in the code snippet is: `NewASC = new AddrSpaceCastInst(NewGEP, GEP->getType(), , GEPI);` This statement creates a new `AddrSpaceCastInst` object called `NewASC` and initializes it with the `NewGEP` object, the type of `GEP`, and a string literal. The `NewASC` object is then used to replace all uses of `GEP` in the code." LLVM,NVPTX,607,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet without knowing the context and the values of the variables used in the code. However, based on the syntax and the structure of the code, it appears that the code is part of a function that is trying to optimize memory instructions. The `isa` function is used to check if the instruction `I` is a `StoreInst`. If it is, then the function `optimizeMemoryInstruction` is called with the address of `I` and a numerical literal as arguments. The return value of `optimizeMemoryInstruction` is then assigned to the" LLVM,NVPTX,608,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return hoistAddrSpaceCastFromGEP(GEP, Depth);` This is because the first `if` statement checks if `V` can be cast to a `GEPOperator`, and if it can, it calls the `hoistAddrSpaceCastFromGEP` function with the `GEP` object and the `Depth` parameter. If the `if` statement is true, then the `return` statement will be executed, and the function will return the result of the `hoistAddrSpaceCastFromGE" LLVM,NVPTX,609,"Based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the next statement will be: Value * NewBC = new AddrSpaceCastInst(Src, TypeOfNewCast, , BCI);" LLVM,NVPTX,610,"The next statement of the code snippet is: NewASC = new AddrSpaceCastInst(NewGEP, GEP->getType(), , GEPI);" LLVM,NVPTX,611,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `NewASC = new AddrSpaceCastInst(NewGEP, GEP->getType(), , GEPI);` This statement creates a new `AddrSpaceCastInst` object called `NewASC` and initializes it with the `NewGEP` object, the type of `GEP`, and a string literal. The `GEPI` object is also passed as an argument to the constructor." LLVM,NVPTX,612,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `Cast` class and the types of the operands. However, based on the names of the variables and the methods being called, it appears that the next statement is likely to be related to the casting of the source and destination types. One possible next statement could be: ``` Value * Dest = Cast->getOperand(); ``` This would retrieve the operand at index `` from the `Cast` object and assign" LLVM,NVPTX,613,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `FavorNonGenericAddrSpaces` function and the `FunctionPass` class. However, based on the name of the function and the fact that it is a member of the `FunctionPass` class, it is likely that the next statement will be a call to a function that performs some kind of optimization or transformation on the function being passed as an argument." LLVM,NVPTX,614,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `FavorNonGenericAddrSpaces` function and the `FunctionPass` class. However, based on the name of the function and the fact that it is a member of the `FunctionPass` class, it is likely that the next statement will be a call to a function that performs some kind of optimization or transformation on the function being passed as an argument." LLVM,NVPTX,615,"The next statement of this code snippet is: MI->setOperand(Idx, ASC->getOperand(0));" LLVM,NVPTX,616,"Based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the next statement will be: `Changed = true;` This is because the `for` loop is iterating over the elements of the `Function` object, and the `Changed` variable is being set to `true` if any of the elements are not equal to the `DisableFavorNonGeneric` value. Since the `DisableFavorNonGeneric` value is not equal to the `Changed` value, the `Changed` value will be set to `true`." LLVM,NVPTX,617,"Based on the code snippet provided, it is difficult to predict the next statement with certainty. However, based on the context and the patterns in the code, it is likely that the next statement will be another iteration of the inner loop, with the iterator `I` being incremented and the loop condition `I != IE` being checked again. The `optimizeMemoryInstruction` function is called with the current instruction `I` and a numeric literal, and the result of the function is assigned to the `Changed` variable. The `Changed` variable is initialized to `false` at the beginning of the outer" LLVM,NVPTX,618,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `MachineFunction` and `MachineBasicBlock` classes, as well as the contents of the `MBB` and `I` variables. However, based on the name of the function and the types of the parameters, it is likely that this function is part of a compiler or interpreter that is generating machine code for a specific instruction set architecture (ISA). The function appears to be responsible for eliminating a call frame pseudo-instruction, which is a placeholder instruction that represents a call to" LLVM,NVPTX,619,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet without knowing the specific implementation of the `emitEpilogue` method in the `FrameLowering` class. However, based on the name of the method and the parameters it takes, it is likely that the next statement will be related to the epilogue of the function being generated. The epilogue is the part of the function that is executed after the main body of the function has completed. It is typically used to restore the stack frame and return control to the caller. Some possible next statements could include: * Restoring" LLVM,NVPTX,620,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet without knowing the specific implementation of the `emitEpilogue` method in the `FrameLowering` class. However, based on the name of the method and the parameters it takes, it is likely that the next statement will be related to the epilogue of the function being generated. The epilogue is the part of the function that is executed after the main body of the function has completed. It is typically used to restore the stack frame and return control to the caller. Some possible next statements could include: * Restoring" LLVM,NVPTX,621,"It's difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific values of the variables and the behavior of the functions being called. However, based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the next statement will be: MI = BuildMI(MBB, MI, dl, MF.getSubtarget().getInstrInfo()->get(CvtaLocalOpcode), ).addReg(); This statement is building a new instruction using the BuildMI function, which takes several parameters" LLVM,NVPTX,622,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `MachineFunction` class and the `hasFP` method. However, based on the name of the method and the fact that it is declared as `const`, it is likely that the next statement will be a check or a calculation related to the presence or absence of a frame pointer in the machine function." LLVM,NVPTX,623,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `TargetFrameLowering::TargetFrameLowering(TargetFrameLowering::StackGrowsUp, , )` This is a constructor call for the `TargetFrameLowering` class, which is a subclass of `FrameLowering`. The constructor takes three arguments: * `TargetFrameLowering::StackGrowsUp`: This is a constant that indicates whether the stack grows up or down. * ``: This is a numeric literal that represents the size of the stack" LLVM,NVPTX,624,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `TargetFrameLowering::TargetFrameLowering(TargetFrameLowering::StackGrowsUp, , )` This is a constructor call for the `TargetFrameLowering` class, which is a subclass of `FrameLowering`. The constructor takes three arguments: * `TargetFrameLowering::StackGrowsUp`: This is a constant that indicates whether the stack grows up or down. * ``: This is a numeric literal that represents the size of the stack" LLVM,NVPTX,625,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `MachineInstr *Instr = &*I;` This line is initializing a pointer to the current instruction in the machine basic block, which is being referred to by the iterator `I`. The `*` operator is used to dereference the iterator and get the instruction it points to. The `&` operator is used to get the address of the instruction, which is then stored in the `Instr` variable." LLVM,NVPTX,626,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be: `MI->setOpcode(Instruction::Push);` This is because the previous statement in the code snippet is `MachineInstr * MI = &MBB.front();`, which assigns the first instruction in the basic block to the `MachineInstr` pointer `MI`. The next logical step would be to set the opcode of this instruction to `Push`, which is a common instruction in many instruction sets." LLVM,NVPTX,627,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the DwarfFrameBase class and the value of the placeholder. However, based on the syntax and the context in which this code snippet appears, it is likely that the next statement will be a return statement that returns a value of type DwarfFrameBase, with the CFA and values being used to initialize the object." LLVM,NVPTX,628,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `getFrameInfo` method and the values of the variables involved. However, based on the context and the names of the variables, it appears that the next statement is likely to be a call to the `getFrameIndexReference` method of the `MachineFrameInfo` object, passing in the `FrameReg` register as an argument. Here is a possible next statement: ``` MachineFrameInfo::getFrameIndexReference(MFI, FI, FrameReg); ``` This" LLVM,NVPTX,629,"Based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the `FrameLowering` class is being defined, and it is inheriting from the `TargetFrameLowering` class. The `TargetFrameLowering` class is being passed three arguments: `StackGrowsUp`, `Align ( )`, and ``. The `Align ( )` argument is likely specifying the alignment of the stack frame, and the `` argument is likely specifying the size of the stack frame. Based on this" LLVM,NVPTX,630,"Based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the `FrameLowering` class is being defined, and it is inheriting from the `TargetFrameLowering` class. The `TargetFrameLowering` class is being passed three arguments: `StackGrowsUp`, `Align ( )`, and ``. The `Align ( )` argument is likely specifying the alignment of the stack frame, and the `` argument is likely specifying the size of the stack frame. Based on this" LLVM,NVPTX,631,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `TargetFrameLowering` class and the `TargetMachine` class. However, based on the information provided, it appears that the code is initializing a new instance of the `FrameLowering` class, which is a subclass of `TargetFrameLowering`. The constructor is taking three arguments: a reference to a `TargetMachine` object, a boolean value indicating whether the target machine is 64-bit, and two integer values that are used to initialize the `TargetFrameLowering" LLVM,NVPTX,632,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `TargetFrameLowering` class and the `TargetMachine` class. However, based on the information provided, it appears that the code is initializing a new instance of the `FrameLowering` class, which is a subclass of `TargetFrameLowering`. The constructor is taking three arguments: a reference to a `TargetMachine` object, a boolean value indicating whether the target machine is 64-bit, and two integer values that are used to initialize the `TargetFrameLowering" LLVM,NVPTX,633,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be: `MI = BuildMI(MBB, MI, dl, MF.getSubtarget().getInstrInfo()->get(MovDepotOpcode), ).addReg();` This is because the `if` statement checks whether the `MR` object's `use_empty` method returns `false`, and if it does, it calls the `BuildMI` function with the `MovDepotOpcode` opcode. The `BuildMI`" LLVM,NVPTX,634,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `const MachineFrameInfo & MFI = MF.getFrameInfo();` This statement retrieves the `MachineFrameInfo` object associated with the `MachineFunction` object `MF` and stores it in the variable `MFI`. The `MachineFrameInfo` object contains information about the frame layout and the registers used for frame indexing." LLVM,NVPTX,635,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the code depends on the specific values of the variables and the implementation of the `getObjectOffset` and `getOffsetOfLocalArea` methods. However, based on the code snippet provided, it is likely that the next statement after the assignment to `FrameReg` will be a return statement, as the code appears to be setting up a return value for a function. The return value is calculated by subtracting the offset of the local area from the offset of the object, which suggests that the code is implementing some" LLVM,NVPTX,636,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific values of the variables and the behavior of the functions being called. However, based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the next statement will be a call to the `BuildMI` function, passing in the `MBB`, `MI`, `dl`, and the result of the `getSubtarget` function as arguments. The `getSubtarget` function is likely to return a value that is used to determine the next instruction to be executed." LLVM,NVPTX,637,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be: `MI = BuildMI(MBB, MI, dl, MF.getSubtarget().getInstrInfo()->get(MovDepotOpcode), ).addReg();` This is because the code is checking if the `MR.use_empty()` is true or false, and if it is false, it is building a new machine instruction using the `BuildMI` function and adding a register to it using the `add" LLVM,NVPTX,638,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific values of the variables and the behavior of the `BuildMI` and `getSubtarget` functions. However, based on the code snippet, it appears that the next statement will be a call to the `addImm` method of the `MachineInstr` object returned by `BuildMI`, passing in the function number as an argument." LLVM,NVPTX,639,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it appears to be part of a larger program and the context is not provided. However, based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the next statement will be an assertion that the front of the MachineFunction is equal to the MachineBasicBlock and a debug location. The code snippet is using the LLVM library to generate machine code for a target architecture. The `MachineFunction` class represents a function in the target machine code, and the `MachineBasicBlock` class represents a basic block in the target machine code. The `get" LLVM,NVPTX,640,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific values of the variables and the behavior of the functions called. However, we can make some educated guesses based on the code snippet. The code snippet appears to be part of a function that is generating machine code for a target machine. The function is checking if the target machine has a generic load/store instruction, and if so, it is adding a register to the instruction. If the target machine does not have a generic load/store instruction, the function is adding a register to the instruction in a different way" LLVM,NVPTX,641,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet without knowing the specific implementation of the `emitEpilogue` method in the `FrameLowering` class. However, based on the name of the method and the parameters it takes, it is likely that the next statement will be related to the epilogue of the function being generated. The epilogue is the part of the function that is executed after the main body of the function has completed. It is typically used to restore the stack frame and return control to the caller. Some possible next statements could include: * Restoring" LLVM,NVPTX,642,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet without knowing the specific implementation of the `emitEpilogue` method in the `FrameLowering` class. However, based on the name of the method and the parameters it takes, it is likely that the next statement will be related to the epilogue of the function being generated. The epilogue is the part of the function that is executed after the main body of the function has completed. It is typically used to restore the stack frame and return control to the caller. Some possible next statements could include: * Restoring" LLVM,NVPTX,643,"Based on the code snippet you provided, it appears to be a part of a function that is building a machine instruction. The function is using a builder pattern to create a `MachineInstr` object, which is then added to a `BasicBlock` object. The code snippet you provided is incomplete, so it's difficult to determine the exact behavior of the function. However, based on the code you provided, it appears that the function is checking the value of a variable called `is64bit` to determine whether to use a 64-bit or 32-bit instruction. If `is" LLVM,NVPTX,644,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet without knowing the context and the values of the variables used in the code. However, based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the code is creating a new virtual register and adding it to a machine instruction. The machine instruction is then added to a basic block, which is a sequence of machine instructions in a function. The code is using the `createVirtualRegister` function to create a new virtual register, and the `BuildMI` function to create a new machine instruction. The `addReg` function is used to add the virtual register to the machine" LLVM,NVPTX,645,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the code depends on the specific implementation of the `FrameLowering` class and the input data. However, based on the name of the method and the parameters passed to it, it is likely that the method is responsible for lowering the frame of a video or image, possibly by resizing it or cropping it to fit a specific aspect ratio." LLVM,NVPTX,646,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `MachineInstr *MI = *I;` This statement assigns the current instruction in the iterator `I` to a pointer to a `MachineInstr` object named `MI`." LLVM,NVPTX,647,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `BuildMI` function and the values of the variables used in the function call. However, based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the next statement will be a call to the `addImm` method of the `MachineInstr` object returned by the `BuildMI` function, passing in the function number of the current function as an argument." LLVM,NVPTX,648,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet without knowing the specifics of the program being executed. However, based on the code snippet provided, it appears to be creating a new virtual register and adding it to a machine instruction. The machine instruction is being built using the `BuildMI` function, which takes several arguments, including the basic block, the machine instruction, the data layout, and the instruction information. The `addReg` function is being used to add the virtual register to the machine instruction, and the `addImm` function is being used to add an immediate value to the machine instruction" LLVM,NVPTX,649,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `MachineFunction` and `MachineFrameInfo` classes, as well as the values of the variables `MF`, `FI`, and `FrameReg`. However, based on the name of the function and the parameters it takes, it is likely that the next statement will be a call to a method of the `MachineFrameInfo` class to retrieve the frame index reference for the specified frame index and register. The method may return a reference to a `FrameIndexReference` object, which can" LLVM,NVPTX,650,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific values of the variables and the behavior of the functions being called. However, based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the next statement will be: `MBBI = MBB . end ( ) ;` This is because the code snippet is currently iterating over the instructions in a basic block, and the `end` method is used to indicate the end of the iteration. The `MBBI` variable is the iterator for the instructions in the basic block, and it is being incremented in" LLVM,NVPTX,651,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet without knowing the specific values of the variables and the implementation of the functions being called. However, based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the next statement will be a call to the `BuildMI` function, which is used to build a machine instruction. The `BuildMI` function takes several arguments, including a basic block, a machine instruction, a debug location, a target, and an instruction info. The `BuildMI` function is likely to return a machine instruction, which is then used to add a register or an immediate value to the instruction." LLVM,NVPTX,652,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `is64bit = STI.is64Bit();` This statement is assigning the result of the `is64Bit()` method of the `Subtarget` object `STI` to the `is64bit` member variable of the `FrameLowering` object." LLVM,NVPTX,653,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `is64bit = STI.is64Bit();` This statement is assigning the result of the `is64Bit()` method of the `Subtarget` object `STI` to the `is64bit` member variable of the `FrameLowering` object." LLVM,NVPTX,654,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `for (Module::iterator I = M.begin(), E = M.end(); I != E; ++I) {` This line is starting a new loop that iterates over the elements of the `Module` object `M`, using the `begin()` and `end()` methods to get the starting and ending iterators for the loop. The loop variable `I` is declared as a `Module::iterator`, which is a type that represents an iterator over the elements of a `Module` object. The loop will continue until `I` reaches the" LLVM,NVPTX,655,"The next statement of the code snippet is: ParamTypes.push_back(PointerType::get(GVType->getElementType(), llvm::ADDRESS_SPACE_GENERIC));" LLVM,NVPTX,656,"The next statement is likely to be: ParamTypes.push_back(Type::getInt8Ty(Context)); This is because the code is creating a vector of types, and the previous statement pushed back a pointer type. The next type to be pushed back is likely to be an integer type, specifically the 8-bit integer type." LLVM,NVPTX,657,The next statement after the `else if` block is `ConstantToValueMap[C] = NewValue;`. LLVM,NVPTX,658,"Based on the code snippet provided, it is difficult to predict the next statement with certainty. However, based on the context and the pattern of the code, it is likely that the next statement will be: NewOperands.push_back(NewOperand); This is because the code is iterating over the operands of an MDNode and creating a new vector of operands, with each operand being processed in turn. The current operand is being processed in the loop, and the next statement is likely to be adding the processed operand to the new vector of operands." LLVM,NVPTX,659,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `NewOperands.push_back(NewOperand);` This statement adds the new operand `NewOperand` to the end of the `NewOperands` vector. The `push_back` method is used to add an element to the end of a vector." LLVM,NVPTX,660,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `N->dropAllReferences();` This is because the `if` statement that precedes it checks whether `OperandChanged` is true, and if it is, it executes the code inside the `if` block. If `OperandChanged` is false, it skips the `if` block and executes the code after it, which is the `N->dropAllReferences();` statement." LLVM,NVPTX,661,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `AU.setPreservesAll(); ` This statement sets the `AnalysisUsage` object `AU` to preserve all the information that is currently available in the analysis." LLVM,NVPTX,662,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `AU.setPreservesAll(); ` This statement sets the `AnalysisUsage` object `AU` to preserve all the information that is currently available in the analysis." LLVM,NVPTX,663,"The next statement of the code snippet is: return Builder . CreateBinOp ( Instruction :: BinaryOps ( C -> getOpcode ( ) ) , NewOperands [ ] , NewOperands [ ] ) ;" LLVM,NVPTX,664,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `GVMap.clear();` This statement clears the `GVMap` map, which is a map of global variables to their corresponding new global variables. The `clear()` method is called on the `GVMap` map to remove all the elements from the map." LLVM,NVPTX,665,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `CVTA = Builder.CreateBitCast(CVTA, DestTy, );` This statement is a call to the `CreateBitCast` method of the `Builder` object, which creates a bitcast instruction that casts the `CVTA` value to the `DestTy` type. The `DestTy` type is a pointer to the `int8` type with the `llvm::ADDRESS_SPACE_GENERIC` address space. The `` argument is a string literal" LLVM,NVPTX,666,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be: `CVTA = Builder.CreateBitCast(GV, ExtendedGVType.getType());` This is because the code is checking if the type of the global variable `GV` is not an integer or floating-point type, and if it's not, it's creating a bitcast of the global variable to the extended type `ExtendedGVType`. The `CreateBitCast` method is used to create a bitcast, which is a type of cast that changes the type of a value without changing its bit pattern." LLVM,NVPTX,667,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return NewOperands;`" LLVM,NVPTX,668,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `N->dropAllReferences();`." LLVM,NVPTX,669,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `for (auto I = GVMap.begin(), E = GVMap.end(); I != E; ++I) {` This line is starting a new loop, where `I` is an iterator over the `GVMap` container, and `E` is an iterator to the end of the container. The loop will continue until `I` is equal to `E`, which means that all elements in the container have been processed. Inside this loop, the code will remap the global variables in the `GVMap` container" LLVM,NVPTX,670,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be the continuation of the `for` loop that iterates over the basic blocks in the function. Specifically, it is likely to be the increment of the loop variable `BBI` and the check for the loop termination condition `BBI != BBE`. Here's a breakdown of the code snippet: 1. The outer `for` loop iterates over the functions in the module `M`. 2. The inner `for` loop iterates over the basic blocks in the current function `I`. 3. The innermost" LLVM,NVPTX,671,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be the continuation of the `for` loop that iterates over the `GVMap` elements. Specifically, the next statement is likely to be the initialization of the `Next` variable, which is the next element in the `GVMap` after the current element `I`. Here's the full code snippet with the next statement highlighted: ``` for (auto I = GVMap.begin(), E = GVMap.end(); I != E; ++I) { GlobalVariable *GV = I->first; Global" LLVM,NVPTX,672,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be the creation of a new function using the `Function::Create` method, with the name `""llvm.convert.from.i8""` and the type signature `{ i8*, i8* }`. The code is creating a new function that takes a pointer to an 8-bit integer and returns a pointer to an 8-bit integer. The function is likely to be used for converting values between different address spaces or data types. The `llvm::ADDRESS_SPACE_GENERIC` constant is used to specify that the function can" LLVM,NVPTX,673,"The next statement of the code snippet is: `NewValue = getOrInsertCVTA(M, F, I->second, Builder);`" LLVM,NVPTX,674,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `NewValue = getOrInsertCVTA(M, F, I->second, Builder);`" LLVM,NVPTX,675,"The code snippet is creating a new value by inserting elements into a vector or array. The next statement is likely to be a loop that iterates over the elements of the vector or array and inserts them into the new value. Here's a breakdown of the code: * `if ( ! OperandChanged ) { return C ; }`: This line checks if the operand has changed, and if not, returns the original value `C`. * `Value * NewValue = UndefValue :: get ( C -> getType ( ) ) ;`: This line creates a new value of the" LLVM,NVPTX,676,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `NewValue = Builder.CreateInsertValue(NewValue, NewOperands[i], makeArrayRef(i));` This statement is part of a loop that iterates over the operands of the constant `C`, and for each operand, it creates a new value by inserting the operand into the `NewValue` constant. The `makeArrayRef(i)` function is used to create an array reference to the operand at index `i` in the `NewOperands` array." LLVM,NVPTX,677,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `VM.clear();` Explanation: The code snippet is part of a function that is iterating over the basic blocks of a module and replacing constant values with new values. The `VM` variable is a `ValueToValueMapTy` object, which is a map from values to values. The `clear()` method is used to clear the contents of the map, which is done before the function starts iterating over the basic blocks." LLVM,NVPTX,678,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return Builder.CreateGetElementPtr(NewOperands[], C->getIndices());` This is because the code is currently handling the `Instruction::GetElementPtr` case, and the next statement is to create a new `GetElementPtr` instruction using the `Builder` and the `NewOperands` vector. The `` placeholders are used to represent the actual values that will be used in the `CreateGetElementPtr` method." LLVM,NVPTX,679,"Based on the code snippet provided, it is difficult to predict the next statement with certainty. However, based on the context and the patterns in the code, it is likely that the next statement will be another case statement for a different instruction opcode. The code snippet appears to be part of a function that is creating a new instruction based on an existing instruction, and it is using a switch statement to handle different instruction opcodes. The function is using a Builder object to create the new instruction, and it is passing in the new operands and the old operands to the Builder object. Based" LLVM,NVPTX,680,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `Builder.CreateAlloca(GV->getType()->getElementType(), nullptr, GV->getName());` This statement creates an alloca instruction in the entry block of the function, which allocates space on the stack for the global variable `GV`. The type of the alloca instruction is the element type of the global variable's type, and the name of the alloca instruction is the name of the global variable. The `nullptr` argument is used to indicate that the alloca instruction should not have a debug location." LLVM,NVPTX,681,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `GVMap.clear();` This statement clears the `GVMap` map, which is used to keep track of the mapping between the old and new global variables. This is done to ensure that the map is empty before the next iteration of the loop, and to avoid any potential issues with duplicate entries in the map." LLVM,NVPTX,682,"The next statement of this code snippet is: NewOperands.push_back(NewOperand);" LLVM,NVPTX,683,"The next statement of the code snippet is: `I->setAlignment(GV->getAlignment());` This statement sets the alignment of the global variable `I` to the alignment of the global variable `GV`. The alignment of a global variable is the number of bytes that the variable should be aligned to in memory. This is typically a power of 2, such as 4 or 8. The alignment of a global variable can be specified using the `setAlignment` method of the `GlobalVariable` class. In this code snippet, the alignment of the global variable `I` is being" LLVM,NVPTX,684,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `ConstantToValueMap.clear();` This statement clears the `ConstantToValueMap` map, which is used to keep track of the constants that have been remapped during the optimization process. The map is cleared at the end of each iteration of the outermost loop, which is the loop that iterates over the functions in the module." LLVM,NVPTX,685,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `DestTy = PointerType::get(GVType->getElementType(), llvm::ADDRESS_SPACE_GENERIC);` This statement is assigning a new value to the `DestTy` variable, which is a pointer type with the element type being the same as the `GVType` variable, and the address space being `llvm::ADDRESS_SPACE_GENERIC`." LLVM,NVPTX,686,"The next statement in the code snippet is: `ParamTypes.push_back(PointerType::get(GVType->getElementType(), llvm::ADDRESS_SPACE_GENERIC));` This statement adds a new element to the `ParamTypes` vector, which is a vector of `Type*` objects. The element being added is a pointer type, with the element type being the result of calling `getElementType()` on the `GVType` object, and the address space being `llvm::ADDRESS_SPACE_GENERIC`." LLVM,NVPTX,687,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `GVMap.erase(GV);` This statement removes the entry for the global variable `GV` from the `GVMap` map. The `erase` method is called on the `GVMap` object, passing in the `GV` object as the key to be removed." LLVM,NVPTX,688,"The next statement of the code snippet is: `I != E;` This is the condition for the outermost loop, which iterates over the named metadata in the module. The loop will continue until `I` is equal to `E`, which marks the end of the named metadata." LLVM,NVPTX,689,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be a call to the `GenericToNVVM` constructor, which is a member function of the `ModulePass` class. The constructor is responsible for initializing the object and preparing it for use. Here is an example of what the next statement might look like: ``` ModulePass *llvm::createGenericToNVVMPass() { return new GenericToNVVM(); } ``` In this example, the `createGenericToNVVMPass` function is called, which returns a new instance" LLVM,NVPTX,690,"The next statement of this code snippet is: return new GenericToNVVM();" LLVM,NVPTX,691,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be the definition of the `runOnModule` function, which is a member function of the `ModulePass` class. The `runOnModule` function is called by the LLVM optimizer to run the pass on a module. Here is an example of what the `runOnModule` function might look like: ``` virtual bool runOnModule(Module &M) { // Perform the pass on the module return false; } ``` The `runOnModule` function takes a `Module` object as an argument," LLVM,NVPTX,692,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be the definition of the `runOnModule` function, which is a member function of the `ModulePass` class. The `runOnModule` function is called by the LLVM optimizer to run the pass on a module. Here is an example of what the `runOnModule` function might look like: ``` virtual bool runOnModule(Module &M) { // Perform the pass on the module return false; } ``` The `runOnModule` function takes a `Module` object as an argument," LLVM,NVPTX,693,"The next statement of this code snippet is: AU.setPreservesAll();" LLVM,NVPTX,694,"The next statement of this code snippet is: AU.setPreservesAll();" LLVM,NVPTX,695,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `GVMapTy::iterator I = GVMap.find(cast(C));` This line is searching for the iterator `I` in the `GVMap` map that corresponds to the `GlobalVariable` object `C`. The `find` method is used to search for the iterator, and the `cast` method is used to cast the `Value` object `C` to a `GlobalVariable` object." LLVM,NVPTX,696,"The next statement in the code snippet is: `ConstantToValueMap[C] = NewValue;` This statement adds the new value `NewValue` to the `ConstantToValueMap` map, using the constant `C` as the key." LLVM,NVPTX,697,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific input and the behavior of the `Builder` object. However, based on the code provided, it appears that the next statement will be a `return` statement that creates a new instruction using the `Builder` object. The `Builder` object is used to create instructions, and the `Create` methods are used to create specific types of instructions. The `Create` methods take a variety of arguments, including the instruction opcode, the operands, and the type of the instruction. The `Create` methods" LLVM,NVPTX,698,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific input and the behavior of the `Builder` object. However, based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the next statement will be: `NewValue = Builder.CreateInsertValue(NewValue, NewOperands[i], makeArrayRef(i));` This statement is part of a loop that iterates over the operands of the `ConstantVector` object `C`. The loop starts at index `` and continues until the end of the operands" LLVM,NVPTX,699,"The next statement of the code snippet is: `GVMap.erase(I);` Explanation: The code snippet is part of a function that is transforming a module by replacing all uses of global variables with new global variables that have the same type and initializer as the original global variables. The `GVMap` is a map that maps the original global variables to the new global variables. The code snippet is iterating over the `GVMap` and for each entry, it is replacing all uses of the original global variable with the new global variable. The `erase`" LLVM,NVPTX,700,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet without knowing the context and the definitions of the functions and variables involved. However, based on the syntax and the names of the functions, it appears that the code is trying to perform some kind of cleanup or finalization operation on an object or resource. The `cleanupValue` function is likely to be a function that takes a value as an argument and performs some kind of cleanup or finalization operation on it. The `getAggregateOperand` function is likely to be a function that returns an aggregate operand, which could be a value" LLVM,NVPTX,701,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return cleanupValue(EVI->getAggregateOperand());` This statement is calling the `cleanupValue` function on the `AggregateOperand` of the `ExtractValueInst` object `EVI`. The `cleanupValue` function is not defined in the code snippet, so it is not possible to determine what it does. However, based on the name of the function, it is likely that it performs some kind of cleanup or optimization on the value passed to it." LLVM,NVPTX,702,"The next statement in the code snippet is: `return new ImageOptimizer();` This statement creates a new instance of the `ImageOptimizer` class and returns it as the result of the `createImageOptimizerPass` function. The `ISA_LIT` template parameter is used to specify the type of the `ImageOptimizer` class that should be created." LLVM,NVPTX,703,"The next statement in the code snippet is: `return new ImageOptimizer();` This statement creates a new instance of the `ImageOptimizer` class and returns it as the result of the `createImageOptimizerPass` function. The `ISA_LIT` template parameter is used to specify the type of the `ImageOptimizer` class that should be created." LLVM,NVPTX,704,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be the initialization of the `FunctionPass` object with the `ID` parameter. Here's a breakdown of the code snippet: * `ISA_LIT` is a macro that expands to a string literal. * `ImageOptimizer` is a class that inherits from `FunctionPass`. * `ImageOptimizer` is being defined as a constructor that takes no arguments. * The constructor initializes the `FunctionPass` object with the `ID` parameter. Therefore, the next statement of" LLVM,NVPTX,705,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be the initialization of the `FunctionPass` object with the `ID` parameter. Here's a breakdown of the code snippet: * `ISA_LIT` is a macro that expands to a string literal. * `ImageOptimizer` is a class that inherits from `FunctionPass`. * `ImageOptimizer` is being defined as a constructor that takes no arguments. * The constructor initializes the `FunctionPass` object with the `ID` parameter. Therefore, the next statement of" LLVM,NVPTX,706,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return true;` This is because the `if` statement has two branches: one for when `isSampler(*TexHandle)` is true, and one for when `isImage(*TexHandle)` is true. If neither of these conditions is true, then the `else` branch is executed, which simply returns `true`." LLVM,NVPTX,707,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return false;` Explanation: The `replaceIsTypePSurface` function is checking if the `TexHandle` value is an image read-write or image write-only type. If it is, the function returns `false`. If it is not, the function will continue to execute the next statement, which is not shown in the code snippet." LLVM,NVPTX,708,"The next statement in the code snippet is: `replaceWith( &I, ConstantInt::getFalse(I.getContext()) );` This statement replaces the current instruction (`I`) with a constant integer value of `false` using the `replaceWith` function. The `ConstantInt::getFalse` function is used to get the `false` constant integer value. The `I.getContext()` method is used to get the context of the current instruction, which is passed as an argument to the `ConstantInt::getFalse` function." LLVM,NVPTX,709,"The next statement after `replaceWith ( & I , ConstantInt :: getTrue ( I . getContext ( ) ) ) ;` is `return true ;`." LLVM,NVPTX,710,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `Dest = BI->getSuccessor(1);` Explanation: The code snippet is part of a function called `replaceWith` that takes two arguments: `From`, which is a pointer to an `Instruction` object, and `To`, which is a pointer to a `ConstantInt` object. The function is used to replace all uses of `From` with `To`. The code snippet starts by iterating over the uses of `From` using a `CallInst::use_iterator` called `UI`." LLVM,NVPTX,711,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `BranchInst::Create(Dest, BI);` This statement creates a new branch instruction that branches to the basic block `Dest` from the current basic block `BI`. The `Create` method is a static method of the `BranchInst` class, and it takes two arguments: the first is the destination basic block, and the second is the current basic block." LLVM,NVPTX,712,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `InstrToDelete.push_back(BI);` This line adds the `BranchInst` `BI` to the `InstrToDelete` vector, which is a list of instructions that will be deleted later. The `push_back` method is used to add an element to the end of the vector." LLVM,NVPTX,713,"The next statement of the code snippet is: `if (skipFunction(F)) return false;` This statement checks if the function `F` should be skipped, and if so, returns `false`. If the function should not be skipped, the code continues to the next statement." LLVM,NVPTX,714,"The next statement after the `else if` block will be the `else` block. The `else` block will be executed if the condition in the `else if` block is not met. In this case, the condition is `isImageWriteOnly(*TexHandle) || isImageReadWrite(*TexHandle) || isImageReadOnly(*TexHandle)`. If this condition is not met, the `else` block will be executed, which will return `false`." LLVM,NVPTX,715,"The next statement after `replaceWith(&I, ConstantInt::getFalse(I.getContext()));` will be `return true;`. The `replaceWith` function replaces the value of the `I` object with a new value, which is `ConstantInt::getFalse(I.getContext())`. This means that the `I` object will now have the value `false`. The `return true;` statement will then be executed, which will return `true` from the function." LLVM,NVPTX,716,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific input and the behavior of the `getCalledFunction` and `isIntrinsic` functions. However, based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the next statement will be: `case : Changed |= replaceIsTypePSampler ( Instr ) ; break ;` This is because the `switch` statement is checking the value of `CalledF -> getIntrinsicID ( )`, and the `default` case is not being" LLVM,NVPTX,717,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `if (isAddressExpression(*V) && V->getType()->getPointerAddressSpace() == AddressSpace::ADDRESS_SPACE_GENERIC) {` This is because the `assert` statement is used to check if the expression `V->getType()->isPointerTy()` is true, and if it is, then the `if` statement is executed. If the `assert` statement fails, then the program will terminate with an error message. In this case, the `assert` statement is checking if the type of the" LLVM,NVPTX,718,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be a call to the `GetElementPtr` instruction, which is used to compute the address of a subobject (such as an element of an array or a field of a structure). The `GetElementPtr` instruction takes a pointer operand and a set of indices that specify the subobject to be accessed. The `GetElementPtr` instruction is used to implement C/C++ pointer arithmetic and array indexing. In this code snippet, the `GetElementPtr` instruction is being used to compute the address of a subobject of a pointer operand. The" LLVM,NVPTX,719,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `NewOperands.push_back(Operand);`" LLVM,NVPTX,720,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return NewGEP;` This is because the code is currently inside the `case Instruction::GetElementPtr` block, and the last statement executed in this block is `return NewGEP;`." LLVM,NVPTX,721,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be: `PostorderStack.push_back(std::make_pair(&I, false));` This is because the code is iterating over the instructions in the function `F` and checking if each instruction is a `LoadInst`. If it is, it is pushing the instruction and a boolean value (initialized to `false`) onto a stack. The stack is likely to be used to keep track of the instructions that have been visited and their corresponding boolean values." LLVM,NVPTX,722,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `PostorderStack.push_back(PtrOperand);`" LLVM,NVPTX,723,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be a return statement, as it is common for functions that create objects to return a pointer to the created object. Therefore, the next statement of this code snippet is likely to be: return new FunctionPass(new InferAddressSpacesPass());" LLVM,NVPTX,724,"The next statement of the code snippet is: return SmallVector < Value * , > ( IncomingValues . begin ( ) , IncomingValues . end ( ) ) ;" LLVM,NVPTX,725,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return SmallVector < Value * , > ( IncomingValues . begin ( ) , IncomingValues . end ( ) ) ;` This statement is inside the `case Instruction :: PHI` block, which is executed when the `Op` object is a `PHINode`. The `IncomingValues` variable is a vector of values that are incoming to the `PHINode`, and the statement creates a new `SmallVector` object that contains these values. The `SmallVector` constructor takes two iter" LLVM,NVPTX,726,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `Worklist.push_back(User);`" LLVM,NVPTX,727,"The next statement in the code snippet is: `case Instruction::PHI:`." LLVM,NVPTX,728,"The next statement of this code snippet will be: `return AS1 == AS2 ? AS1 : ( unsigned ) AddressSpace :: ADDRESS_SPACE_GENERIC ;` This statement is a ternary operator, which is a shorthand for an if-else statement. The condition `AS1 == AS2` is evaluated, and if it is true, the value of `AS1` is returned. If it is false, the value of `( unsigned ) AddressSpace :: ADDRESS_SPACE_GENERIC` is returned." LLVM,NVPTX,729,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `InferAddressSpaces` function and the input data. However, based on the name of the function and the fact that it is a `FunctionPass`, it is likely that the next statement will be a call to another function or a block of code that performs some kind of analysis or transformation on the input data." LLVM,NVPTX,730,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `InferAddressSpaces` function and the input data. However, based on the name of the function and the fact that it is a `FunctionPass`, it is likely that the next statement will be a call to another function or a block of code that performs some kind of analysis or transformation on the input data." LLVM,NVPTX,731,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return UndefValue::get(Operand->getType()->getPointerElementType()->getPointerTo(NewAddrSpace));` This statement returns an `UndefValue` object, which is a special value that represents an undefined value in the LLVM IR. The `getPointerTo` method is called on the `PointerType` object returned by `getPointerElementType`, which returns a `PointerType` object that represents a pointer to the specified address space. The `get` method is then called on this `PointerType` object," LLVM,NVPTX,732,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `I->replaceUsesOfWith(V, NewV);`" LLVM,NVPTX,733,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of the code snippet with certainty without knowing the specific implementation of the `collectGenericAddressExpressions` function and the `ValueToAddrSpaceMapTy` type. However, based on the names of the variables and the context of the code, it is likely that the next statement will be related to processing the `Postorder` vector and the `InferredAddrSpace` map. One possible next statement could be: ``` for (auto &value : Postorder) { // Process the value and update the InferredAddrSpace map }" LLVM,NVPTX,734,"The next statement after the `if` block is: ``` ValueToAddrSpaceMapTy InferredAddrSpace; ``` This line declares a variable `InferredAddrSpace` of type `ValueToAddrSpaceMapTy`." LLVM,NVPTX,735,"The next statement of the code snippet is: `InferredAddrSpace.count(PtrOperand) = 0;` Explanation: The `if` statement checks if the `InferredAddrSpace` has a count of `PtrOperand`. If the count is 0, it means that the `InferredAddrSpace` does not have a record of `PtrOperand`, and the `else` block is executed. In the `else` block, the `OperandAS` is set to the address space of the `PtrOperand` using the `" LLVM,NVPTX,736,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `MCInstPrinter::MCInstPrinter(const MCAsmInfo &MAI, const MCInstrInfo &MII, const MCRegisterInfo &MRI) : MCInstPrinter(MAI, MII, MRI) {}` This is a constructor for the `MCInstPrinter` class, which is a subclass of `InstPrinter`. The constructor takes three arguments: a reference to a `MCAsmInfo` object, a reference to a `MCInstrInfo` object, and a reference to a `" LLVM,NVPTX,737,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `MCInstPrinter::MCInstPrinter(const MCAsmInfo &MAI, const MCInstrInfo &MII, const MCRegisterInfo &MRI) : MCInstPrinter(MAI, MII, MRI) {}` This is a constructor for the `MCInstPrinter` class, which is a subclass of `InstPrinter`. The constructor takes three arguments: a reference to a `MCAsmInfo` object, a reference to a `MCInstrInfo` object, and a reference to a `" LLVM,NVPTX,738,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `printInstruction` and `printAnnotation` functions, as well as the values of the variables `MI`, `Address`, `OS`, and `Annot`. However, based on the names of the functions and the variables, it is likely that the next statement will be a call to the `printAnnotation` function, passing in the `OS` and `Annot` variables as arguments. This would print the annotation associated with the instruction at the specified address." LLVM,NVPTX,739,"Based on the code snippet you provided, it appears to be a part of a function that is checking the value of a ""Modifier"" string and taking different actions based on its value. The next statement of the code snippet you provided would be: if ( ! strcmp ( Modifier , ) ) { if ( Imm ) O << ; } This statement checks if the ""Modifier"" string is equal to a specific string literal (represented by ). If it is, then the code inside the" LLVM,NVPTX,740,"Based on the code snippet you provided, it appears that the next statement will be: `O << Imm;` This is because the `if` statement that checks the value of `Modifier` is not true, so the `else if` statement that checks the value of `Imm` is executed. If `Imm` is greater than or equal to the value of ``, then the statement `O << Imm;` will be executed." LLVM,NVPTX,741,"Based on the code snippet you provided, it appears to be a part of a function that is formatting a string to represent an assembly instruction. The function takes an `Op` object as an argument, and based on the type of the `Op` object, it formats the string in a different way. The code snippet you provided is incomplete, so it's difficult to say exactly what the next statement will be. However, based on the code you provided, it seems likely that the next statement will be a call to the `printRegName` function, which is used to print the name of a register." LLVM,NVPTX,742,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `O << markup() << formatImm(Op.getImm()) << markup();` This statement is executed if `Op.isImm()` returns `true`, which means that the operand is an immediate value. The statement formats the immediate value using the `formatImm()` function and prints it to the output stream `O` using the `markup()` function." LLVM,NVPTX,743,"The next statement after the code snippet you provided is: `OS << ; break ;` This statement is the default case of the switch statement, and it will be executed if the value of the variable `x` is not equal to any of the case labels. The statement writes the string literal `` to the output stream `OS`, and then breaks out of the switch statement." LLVM,NVPTX,744,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `printInstruction` and `printAnnotation` functions, as well as the values of the variables `MI`, `OS`, and `Annot`. However, based on the names of the functions and the variables, it is likely that the next statement will print the instruction and annotation to the output stream `OS`." LLVM,NVPTX,745,"Based on the code snippet you provided, it appears to be a part of a function that is checking the modifier string and printing out a specific string based on the modifier. The next statement in the code snippet is: `if ( strcmp ( Modifier , ) == ) { if ( Imm & :: FTZ_FLAG ) O << ; }` This statement checks if the modifier string is equal to a specific string (represented by ` ;`. LLVM,NVPTX,747,"The next statement after the code snippet you provided is likely to be the end of the `switch` statement, which is indicated by the `}` character. Here's the complete code snippet with the next statement added: ``` case : OS << ; break ; case : OS << ; break ; case : OS << ; break ; case : OS << ; break" LLVM,NVPTX,748,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `OS << VReg;` Explanation: The code snippet is a switch statement that is checking the value of `RegNo` and outputting a string literal based on the value. The `break` statements are used to exit the switch statement and the `case` statements are used to specify the different values that `RegNo` can take. The `OS << VReg;` statement is outside of the switch statement and is outputting the value of `VReg` to the output stream `OS`." LLVM,NVPTX,749,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `setAvailableFeatures(STI.getFeatureBits());` This statement is calling the `setAvailableFeatures` method of the `MCInstPrinter` class, passing in the result of the `getFeatureBits` method of the `MCSubtargetInfo` class, which is stored in the `STI` variable. The `setAvailableFeatures` method sets the available features for the instruction printer, based on the features supported by the target architecture." LLVM,NVPTX,750,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the code depends on the input it receives. However, we can make some educated guesses based on the structure of the code. The code appears to be a switch statement that is handling different cases based on the value of a string. The cases are labeled with different strings, such as ""LO"", ""LS"", ""HI"", ""HS"", ""EQU"", ""NEU"", ""LTU"", ""LEU"", ""GTU"", ""GEU"", ""NUM"", and ""NotANumber""." LLVM,NVPTX,751,"Based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the next statement will be: `case :: RMI : O << ; break ;` This is because the code is checking the value of `Imm` against various bitmasks and modifiers, and if the value matches a specific case, it will execute the corresponding code. In this case, the code is checking if the value of `Imm` matches the bitmask `RMI` (which is represented by the string literal ` :: RMI`), and if" LLVM,NVPTX,752,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `O << ;` This is because the `switch` statement is checking the value of `c` and executing the corresponding code block for each case. If `c` is not equal to any of the cases, the `default` case is executed, which simply returns without doing anything. Therefore, the next statement to be executed is the `O << ;` statement, which writes the string literal `` to the output stream `O`." LLVM,NVPTX,753,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `printInstruction(MI, OS);`" LLVM,NVPTX,754,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `printInstruction` function and the values of the `MI` and `OS` variables. However, based on the name of the function and the variables, it is likely that the function `printInstruction` is used to print an instruction to the screen, and the `MI` and `OS` variables are used to specify the instruction and the operating system, respectively. Therefore, the next statement of this code snippet could be any of the following: *" LLVM,NVPTX,755,"Based on the code snippet you provided, it appears to be a part of a switch statement in C++. The next statement is likely to be the case for the next modifier. The code is using the `strcmp` function to compare the `Modifier` string with a set of predefined modifiers, and based on the result, it is printing a specific string to the `O` stream. Therefore, the next statement is likely to be the case for the next modifier, which could be something like `case :: " LLVM,NVPTX,756,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific values of the variables and the behavior of the `printOperand` function. However, based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the next statement will be: `O << ;` This statement will append the string literal `` to the output stream `O`." LLVM,NVPTX,757,"Based on the code snippet you provided, it appears to be a part of a function that is printing out the name of a register or an immediate value. The function takes two arguments: `O`, which is an output stream, and `Reg`, which is a register object. The first `if` statement checks if the `Op` object is a register, and if so, it prints the name of the register using the `printRegName` function. The second `if` statement checks if the `Op` object is an immediate value, and if so, it formats the immediate value using" LLVM,NVPTX,758,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be a call to a method or function that operates on the `Sym` object, which is a `MCSymbol` object. The method or function being called is not specified in the code snippet provided, so it is not possible to predict with certainty what the next statement will be. However, some possible options for the next statement could include: * A call to a method that sets the value of a property of the `Sym` object, such as `Sym.setValue(someValue)`. * A call to a method that gets the value of" LLVM,NVPTX,759,"The next statement of this code snippet is: return RegInfo;" LLVM,NVPTX,760,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it appears to be a part of a larger program and the context is not provided. However, based on the syntax and structure of the code, it is possible to make some educated guesses about the next statement. The code snippet appears to be a part of a function that is processing a sequence of instructions, and the `else if` statements are used to handle different cases based on the value of `DestRC`. The first `else if` statement checks if `DestRC` is equal to a specific string literal, and if so" LLVM,NVPTX,761,"This code snippet is a part of a larger program that is generating machine code for a specific instruction set architecture (ISA). The code is using a library called LLVM to generate the machine code. The code is defining a function called `InsertBranch` that takes several parameters: * `MBB`: a reference to a `MachineBasicBlock` object, which represents a basic block in the machine code. * `TBB`: a pointer to a `MachineBasicBlock` object, which represents the target basic block for the branch instruction. * `FBB`: a pointer to a `Machine" LLVM,NVPTX,762,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `InstrInfo` class and the `TargetMachine` class. However, based on the code snippet provided, it is likely that the next statement will be the initialization of the `RegInfo` member variable, which is likely to be a `RegInfo` object that is created using the `getSubtargetImpl()` method of the `TargetMachine` class. Here is a possible next statement: ``` RegInfo = new RegInfo(*TM.getSubtargetImpl()); ```" LLVM,NVPTX,763,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `InstrInfo` class and the `TargetMachine` class. However, based on the code snippet provided, it is likely that the next statement will be the initialization of the `RegInfo` member variable, which is likely to be a `RegInfo` object that is created using the `getSubtargetImpl()` method of the `TargetMachine` class. Here is a possible next statement: ``` RegInfo = new RegInfo(*TM.getSubtargetImpl()); ```" LLVM,NVPTX,764,"This code snippet is a part of a larger function that appears to be generating machine code for a specific instruction set architecture. The code is using the LLVM library to generate the machine code. The code is checking the values of the `DestRC` and `SrcRC` variables, and based on their values, it is setting the `Op` variable to a specific value. The `Op` variable is then used to generate the machine code for the instruction. The code is also using the `getKillRegState` function to get the kill state of the source register, and adding it to the" LLVM,NVPTX,765,"The next statement is: `llvm_unreachable()` This statement is executed if none of the previous conditions are true, which means that the `DestReg` and `SrcReg` are not contained in the `STR_LIT` string. The `llvm_unreachable` function is called with the `STR_LIT` string as an argument, which indicates that the code should not be reached." LLVM,NVPTX,766,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be: `Op = ( SrcRC == & ? : ) ;` This is because the code is checking the register class of the destination and source registers, and based on the result, it is setting the value of the `Op` variable to a specific value. The `Op` variable is then used to determine the type of instruction to be generated." LLVM,NVPTX,767,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it appears to be a fragment of a larger program and the context is not provided. However, based on the syntax and structure of the code, it appears to be a conditional statement that assigns a value to the variable `Op` based on the values of `DestRC` and `SrcRC`. The first `if` statement checks if `DestRC` is equal to a specific string literal, and if so, it assigns a value to `Op` based on the value of `SrcRC`. The second `" LLVM,NVPTX,768,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `BuildMI(&MBB, DL, get("""")).add(Cond[]).addMBB(TBB);` This statement is part of the `if` block that is executed if `!FBB` is true. It creates a new `BuildMI` object, adds a condition to it using the `add` method, and then adds a basic block to the `BuildMI` object using the `addMBB` method. The `BuildMI` object is then returned." LLVM,NVPTX,769,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `BuildMI(&MBB, DL, get()).add(Cond[]).addMBB(TBB);` This statement is a method call to `BuildMI`, which is a class that appears to be related to building machine instructions. The method call is passing in a reference to `MBB`, `DL`, and the result of calling `get()`. The method is then adding an element to the `Cond` array at index `" LLVM,NVPTX,770,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `InstrInfo` class and the `RegInfo` class. However, based on the names of the classes and the fact that `InstrInfo` is a subclass of `RegInfo`, it is likely that the next statement will be a constructor for the `InstrInfo` class that initializes the object's state. Here is an example of what the next statement might look like: ``` InstrInfo::InstrInfo() : RegInfo() { //" LLVM,NVPTX,771,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `InstrInfo` class and the `RegInfo` class. However, based on the names of the classes and the fact that `InstrInfo` is a subclass of `RegInfo`, it is likely that the next statement will be a constructor for the `InstrInfo` class that initializes the object's state. Here is an example of what the next statement might look like: ``` InstrInfo::InstrInfo() : RegInfo() { //" LLVM,NVPTX,772,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `InstrInfo` class and the context in which it is being used. However, based on the name of the method and the fact that it is a member of the `InstrInfo` class, it is likely that this method is used to anchor the `InstrInfo` object to a specific location in memory, such as a specific instruction or a specific address." LLVM,NVPTX,773,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `InstrInfo` class and the context in which it is being used. However, based on the name of the method and the fact that it is a member of the `InstrInfo` class, it is likely that this method is used to anchor the `InstrInfo` object to a specific location in memory, such as a specific instruction or a specific address." LLVM,NVPTX,774,"Based on the code snippet you provided, it appears to be a part of a function that is checking the values of `DestRC` and `SrcRC` and assigning a value to `Op` based on those values. The code snippet you provided is incomplete, so it's difficult to say exactly what the next statement will be. However, based on the pattern of the code you provided, it's likely that the next statement will be another `else if` statement that checks the value of `DestRC` and assigns a value to `Op` based on that value. Here is a" LLVM,NVPTX,775,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific values of the variables and the behavior of the functions being called. However, based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the next statement will be: `BuildMI(&MBB, DL, get()).addReg(Cond[].getReg()).addMBB(TBB);` This statement is adding a register to the `MBB` object, which is a member of the `BuildMI` class. The register is" LLVM,NVPTX,776,"Based on the code snippet provided, it is difficult to predict the next statement with certainty. However, based on the context and the structure of the code, it is likely that the next statement will be a member function or variable declaration within the `InstrInfo` class. The `InstrInfo` class appears to be derived from two base classes: `GenInstrInfo` and `RegInfo`. The `GenInstrInfo` class likely provides general instruction information, while the `RegInfo` class provides information about registers. The `InstrInfo` class is likely to provide additional information specific to the" LLVM,NVPTX,777,"Based on the code snippet provided, it is difficult to predict the next statement with certainty. However, based on the context and the structure of the code, it is likely that the next statement will be a member function or variable declaration within the `InstrInfo` class. The `InstrInfo` class appears to be derived from two base classes: `GenInstrInfo` and `RegInfo`. The `GenInstrInfo` class likely provides general instruction information, while the `RegInfo` class provides information about registers. The `InstrInfo` class is likely to provide additional information specific to the" LLVM,NVPTX,778,"The next statement of this code snippet is: I = MBB.end(); Explanation: The code snippet is iterating over the instructions in a basic block (MBB) and erasing certain instructions based on certain conditions. The variable I is used to represent the current instruction being processed. The first statement in the code snippet is: I = MBB.begin(); This sets the variable I to the first instruction in the basic block. The next statement is: I = MBB.end(); This sets the variable I to the" LLVM,NVPTX,779,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `I = MBB.end()` Explanation: The code snippet is a part of a function that is iterating over the instructions in a machine basic block (MBB). The iterator `I` is initialized to the end of the MBB, and the loop continues until `I` is equal to the beginning of the MBB. In the current iteration, the instruction pointed to by `I` is not a `ret` instruction, so the loop continues to the next instruction. The next instruction is the last instruction in the MB" LLVM,NVPTX,780,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `if ( ! FBB ) {` This is because the first `assert` statement is a no-op, and the second `assert` statement is also a no-op since the condition is always true. The `if` statement is then executed, and the code inside the `if` block is executed if `FBB` is false." LLVM,NVPTX,781,"Based on the code snippet provided, it is difficult to predict the next statement with certainty. However, based on the context and the syntax of the code, it is likely that the next statement will be a constructor for the `InstrInfo` class, which is a subclass of `GenInstrInfo` and `RegInfo`. The constructor is likely to initialize the object with the values provided in the constructor parameters, such as the `Subtarget` and `STI` objects. It may also perform other initialization tasks, such as setting up the instruction set architecture (ISA) for the target machine." LLVM,NVPTX,782,"Based on the code snippet provided, it is difficult to predict the next statement with certainty. However, based on the context and the syntax of the code, it is likely that the next statement will be a constructor for the `InstrInfo` class, which is a subclass of `GenInstrInfo` and `RegInfo`. The constructor is likely to initialize the object with the values provided in the constructor parameters, such as the `Subtarget` and `STI` objects. It may also perform other initialization tasks, such as setting up the instruction set architecture (ISA) for the target machine." LLVM,NVPTX,783,"Based on the code snippet you provided, it appears to be a part of a function that is checking the size of a register and determining the appropriate operation to perform based on the size of the register. The code is checking the size of the destination register class (DestRC) and the source register class (SrcRC) to determine if they are the same size. If they are not the same size, the function is reporting a fatal error. If the destination register class is equal to a specific register class (e.g. ""GPR""), the function is setting the operation to a specific value (" LLVM,NVPTX,784,"This code snippet appears to be part of a function that is checking the instructions in a basic block (BB) to see if they can be reordered. The function is checking the opcode of the instructions and the operands of the instructions to determine if they can be reordered. The function starts by initializing a few variables: * `SecondLastInst` is set to the second-to-last instruction in the BB. * `LastInst` is set to the last instruction in the BB. * `TBB` is set to the target basic block of the second-to-last" LLVM,NVPTX,785,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `if (SecondLastInst && I != MBB.begin() && isUnpredicatedTerminator(*--I)) return true;` This statement checks if the second-to-last instruction is a terminator instruction and if it is unpredicated (i.e., it is not guarded by a condition). If the condition is true, the function returns true." LLVM,NVPTX,786,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty because the behavior of the code depends on the values of the variables `DestRC` and `SrcRC`, which are not provided in the code snippet. However, based on the structure of the code, it appears that the `Op` variable is being assigned a value based on the comparison of `DestRC` and `SrcRC`. If `DestRC` and `SrcRC` are both equal to `& `, then `Op` will be assigned the value ``." LLVM,NVPTX,787,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it appears to be a fragment of a larger program and the context is not provided. However, based on the syntax and structure of the code, it appears to be a method or function that is part of a larger program that is generating machine code for a processor. The method takes several parameters, including a pointer to a memory buffer (MBB), a pointer to a data structure (DL), and a string literal (). It appears to be building a machine instruction (MI) using these parameters, and adding" LLVM,NVPTX,788,"The next statement after the `if` block is `BuildMI(&MBB, DL, get()).addMBB(TBB);`." LLVM,NVPTX,789,"Based on the code snippet provided, it is difficult to determine the next statement with certainty. However, based on the structure of the code and the patterns present, it is likely that the next statement will be another `else if` statement, similar to the ones already present in the code snippet. The `else if` statements in the code snippet are used to check the value of `DestRC` and perform a specific action based on that value. The actions taken in each `else if` statement are similar, with the main difference being the value of `DestRC` that is being checked. Therefore" LLVM,NVPTX,790,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific values of the variables and the behavior of the functions being called. However, based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the next statement will be a call to the `BuildMI` function, passing in the `MBB`, `I`, `DL`, and `DestReg` variables as arguments. The `BuildMI` function is not defined in the code snippet provided, so it is not possible to determine the exact behavior of the function or the values that it will return. However, based on the" LLVM,NVPTX,791,"Based on the code snippet you provided, it is difficult to predict the next statement with certainty. However, based on the context and the structure of the code, it appears that the next statement will be an assignment to the `Op` variable. The `Op` variable is being assigned a value based on the value of `DestRC` and `SrcRC`. The code is checking the size of `DestRC` and `SrcRC` and then assigning a value to `Op` based on the comparison. The values being assigned to `Op` are all strings, so it is likely that the next" LLVM,NVPTX,792,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `assert(TBB && FBB);` This is because the `InsertBranch` function is checking that both the `TBB` and `FBB` parameters are non-null before proceeding with the branch insertion. The `assert` statement is used to verify this condition and ensure that the function is being called correctly. If either `TBB` or `FBB` is null, the assertion will fail and the program will terminate with an error message." LLVM,NVPTX,793,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `TBB = SecondLastInst.getOperand().getMBB();` This statement is executed if the `SecondLastInst` instruction has the opcode `` and the `LastInst` instruction has the opcode ``. In this case, the `TBB` variable is set to the result of calling the `getMBB()` method on the operand of the `SecondLastInst` instruction with the index ``." LLVM,NVPTX,794,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `TBB = LastInst . getOperand ( ) . getMBB ( ) ;` This is because the `if` statement that precedes it checks whether the `LastInst` instruction's opcode is ``, and if so, it sets `TBB` to the result of calling `getMBB()` on the operand with index ``." LLVM,NVPTX,795,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the code depends on the specific values of the variables and the implementation of the `getOpcode()` method. However, based on the code snippet provided, it is likely that the next statement after the `if` statement will be the `return false` statement. This is because the `if` statement checks whether the opcode of the instruction is equal to a specific value (represented by ``), and if it is, the method returns `false`. If the opcode is not" LLVM,NVPTX,796,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the `getOperand` and `getImm` methods is not specified. However, based on the names of the methods and the context in which they are being called, it is likely that they are used to retrieve the operand and immediate value of an instruction, respectively. Therefore, the next statement of this code snippet is likely to be a call to one of these methods, such as `MI.getOperand().getImm()`, which would retrieve the immediate" LLVM,NVPTX,797,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `TBB = SecondLastInst->getOperand().getMBB();`" LLVM,NVPTX,798,"The next statement after the given code snippet is: `return false;` This is because the code checks if the instruction is a load or store instruction, and if it is, it checks if the address space is shared. If the address space is shared, the function returns false. If the address space is not shared, the function continues to the next statement, which is `return false;`." LLVM,NVPTX,799,"The next statement after the given code snippet is: `BuildMI ( MBB , I , DL , get ( ) , DestReg ) . addReg ( SrcReg , getKillRegState ( KillSrc ) ) ;` This is because the `else if` statement is executed only if the condition ` . contains ( DestReg ) && . contains ( SrcReg )` is true, and the `addReg` method is called on the `BuildMI` object with the `SrcReg" LLVM,NVPTX,800,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be: `unsigned getLdStCodeAddrSpace ( const MachineInstr & MI ) const { return MI . getOperand ( ) . getImm ( ) ; }` This is because the code snippet is defining a function called `getLdStCodeAddrSpace` that takes a `MachineInstr` object as an argument and returns an `unsigned` value. The function is using the `getOperand` method of the `MachineInstr` object to get the operand at index" LLVM,NVPTX,801,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the context in which the code is being executed and the values of the variables involved. However, based on the code snippet provided, it is likely that the next statement will be the return statement, which will return the value of the `RegInfo` variable to the calling function." LLVM,NVPTX,802,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the implementation of the `getRegisterInfo` method and the specific values of the `ISA_LIT` constant and the `RegisterInfo` class. However, based on the name of the method and the return type, it is likely that the method returns a reference to an object of type `RegisterInfo` that contains information about a register." LLVM,NVPTX,803,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `BuildMI(&MBB, DL, get("""")).addReg(Cond[].getReg()).addMBB(TBB);` This statement is a method call to `BuildMI`, which is a class that appears to be used for building machine instructions. The method call is passing three arguments: * `&MBB`: This is a pointer to an object of type `MBB`, which appears to be a class that represents a machine instruction. * `DL`: This is a" LLVM,NVPTX,804,"Based on the code snippet you provided, it appears to be a part of a function that is checking the validity of a condition and building a message based on the result. The first `assert` statement checks that `TBB` is not null and that a string literal is not null or empty. The second `assert` statement checks that the size of `Cond` is equal to either `` or ``, and that a string literal is not null or empty. The `if` statement checks if `FBB` is equal to `);` This statement is assigning the value of the expression `(TSFlags == )` to the variable `isLoad`. The expression compares the value of `TSFlags` to the value of ``, and if they are equal, the result of the expression is `true`, otherwise it is `false`. The value of `isLoad` is then set to the result of this expression." LLVM,NVPTX,806,"The next statement after the code snippet you provided is: `return isLoad;` This statement is executed if the `isLoad` variable is true, which means that the `TSFlags` variable is equal to ``. If the `isLoad` variable is false, the `AddrSpace` variable is set to the result of the `getLdStCodeAddrSpace` function, and the function returns the value of the `isLoad` variable." LLVM,NVPTX,807,"Based on the code snippet you provided, it appears that the next statement will be: `dest.setIsMove(isMove);` This is because the `isMove` variable is set to `true` if the `TSFlags` value is equal to a specific value (which is not shown in the code snippet), and the `dest` and `src` variables are being set to the operands of the move instruction. The `setIsMove` method is then called on the `dest` operand with the `isMove` value as its argument." LLVM,NVPTX,808,"Based on the code snippet you provided, it appears to be a part of a function that is checking if a move instruction is being executed. The code is checking the `TSFlags` field of the `MI` object, which is likely a machine instruction, to see if it has a certain flag set. If the flag is set, the code sets the `isMove` variable to true and then retrieves the destination operand of the move instruction using the `getOperand()` method. Therefore, the next statement of this code snippet would likely be the code that performs the move instruction, such as `dest" LLVM,NVPTX,809,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `if (isStore) AddrSpace = getLdStCodeAddrSpace(MI);` This is because the `isStore` variable is set to `true` if the `TSFlags` field of the `MI` object is equal to a specific value (represented by `` in the code snippet). If `isStore` is `true`, then the `AddrSpace` variable is set to the result of calling the `getLdStCodeAddrSpace` function with the `MI` object as" LLVM,NVPTX,810,"This code snippet is defining a constructor for a class called `InstrInfo`. The constructor is taking a reference to a `TargetMachine` object as an argument, and is using that object to initialize the `TM` member variable of the `InstrInfo` object. The constructor is also initializing the `RegInfo` member variable of the `InstrInfo` object using the `this` pointer and the `getSubtargetImpl()` method of the `TargetMachine` object. Therefore, the next statement of this code snippet would be the initialization of the `RegInfo` member variable." LLVM,NVPTX,811,"This code snippet is defining a constructor for a class called `InstrInfo`. The constructor is taking a reference to a `TargetMachine` object as an argument, and is using that object to initialize the `TM` member variable of the `InstrInfo` object. The constructor is also initializing the `RegInfo` member variable of the `InstrInfo` object using the `this` pointer and the `getSubtargetImpl()` method of the `TargetMachine` object. Therefore, the next statement of this code snippet would be the initialization of the `RegInfo` member variable." LLVM,NVPTX,812,"The next statement of this code snippet is: I = MBB.end(); Explanation: The code snippet is a part of a function that removes branches from a machine basic block. The function starts by setting the iterator I to the end of the machine basic block (MBB). It then checks if I is equal to the beginning of the MBB, and if so, returns a value. If I is not equal to the beginning of the MBB, it decrements I and checks if the opcode of the instruction pointed to by I is not equal to a specific string literal. If the" LLVM,NVPTX,813,"The next statement after the `if` block is the `return` statement. The `if` block checks if `V` is an `Argument` and if it is, it checks if it is a kernel function and if it only reads memory and has no aliasing attributes. If all of these conditions are true, the function returns `true`. Therefore, the next statement after the `if` block is the `return` statement, which returns `true` if the conditions in the `if` block are met, or `false` otherwise." LLVM,NVPTX,814,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `CurDAG` class and the `getTargetConstant` method. However, based on the syntax and the fact that the method is called with three arguments, it is likely that the next statement will be a call to a method or function that takes the result of the `getTargetConstant` method as an argument." LLVM,NVPTX,815,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `CurDAG` class and the `getTargetConstant` method. However, based on the syntax and the fact that the method is called with three arguments, it is likely that the next statement will be a call to a method or function that takes the result of the `getTargetConstant` method as an argument." LLVM,NVPTX,816,"return ""MyPass"";" LLVM,NVPTX,817,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return SelectionDAGISel::runOnMachineFunction(MF);` This statement is a return statement that returns the result of the `runOnMachineFunction` method of the `SelectionDAGISel` class, which is called on the `MF` object. The `runOnMachineFunction` method is a virtual method that is defined in the `MachineFunctionPass` class, and it is overridden in the `SelectionDAGISel` class to perform the actual work of the pass. The `runOnMachineFunction` method returns" LLVM,NVPTX,818,"Based on the code snippet you provided, it appears to be part of a function that is processing a vector of values. The function is checking the value of a constant index and pushing the value onto a vector (E0 or E1) based on the value of the index. If the index is not equal to a specific value, the function is calling an ""llvm_unreachable"" function, which is likely a debugging or error handling function. It is difficult to predict the next statement of the code snippet without more context, as the behavior of the function will depend on the specific values of the variables and" LLVM,NVPTX,819,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return TL -> allowFMA ( * MF , OptLevel ) ;` This statement is a return statement that returns the result of the `allowFMA` method of the `TL` object, which is an instance of the `TargetLowering` class. The `allowFMA` method takes two arguments: `MF` and `OptLevel`, and it returns a boolean value indicating whether the target architecture supports the FMA (Fused Multiply-Add) instruction. The `MF` argument is an instance of" LLVM,NVPTX,820,"The next statement after the code snippet you provided is likely to be the return statement, which is the last statement in the function. The function appears to be a member function of a class that is related to target-specific optimization, and it is likely that the function is returning a boolean value indicating whether or not the target allows unsafe floating-point math. The `TargetLowering` class is likely to be a class that provides target-specific information and functionality for the optimization process. Without more context or information about the specific optimization pass being implemented, it is difficult to provide a more specific prediction about the next" LLVM,NVPTX,821,"The next statement after the code snippet you provided is likely to be the return statement, which is the last statement in the function. The function appears to be a member function of a class that is related to target-specific optimization, and it is likely that the function is returning a boolean value indicating whether or not the target allows unsafe floating-point math. The `TargetLowering` class is likely to be a class that provides target-specific information and functionality for the optimization process. Without more context or information about the specific optimization pass being implemented, it is difficult to provide a more specific prediction about the next" LLVM,NVPTX,822,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be: `Objs.clear();` This is because the `Objs` vector is declared as a `SmallVector` of `const Value *` objects, and the `clear()` method is a common method used to clear the contents of a `SmallVector`. The `Objs` vector is used to store the objects that are being loaded from memory, and the `clear()` method is called to ensure that the vector is empty before loading new objects." LLVM,NVPTX,823,"The next statement after the `if` block is the `return` statement. The `if` block checks if `V` is an `Argument` and if it is, it checks if it is a kernel function and if it only reads memory and has no aliasing attributes. If all of these conditions are true, the function returns `true`. Therefore, the next statement after the `if` block is the `return` statement, which returns `true` if the conditions in the `if` block are met, or `false` otherwise." LLVM,NVPTX,824,"The next statement of the code snippet is: `return false;` This is because the `if` statement checks if `Src` is not a null pointer, and if it is not, it checks if `Src` is a pointer type. If it is not a pointer type, the function returns `false`. If it is a pointer type, it checks if the address space of the pointer is equal to `spN`. If it is not, the function returns `false`. If it is, the function returns `true`." LLVM,NVPTX,825,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet without knowing the context and the specific implementation of the `DAGToDAGISel` class. However, based on the name of the class and the method being called, it is likely that the next statement will be related to the creation of a new instance of the `DAGToDAGISel` class, possibly with the `TM` and `OptLevel` parameters being passed to the constructor." LLVM,NVPTX,826,"Based on the code snippet you provided, the next statement will be: `return :: LOCAL;` This is because the code checks if the `Src` pointer is null, and if it is, it returns the string literal ""GENERIC"". If `Src` is not null, it checks the address space of the pointer and returns the appropriate string literal based on the address space. The first case is for the local address space, which is why the next statement is `return :: LOCAL;`." LLVM,NVPTX,827,The next statement is likely to be `return IsSigned ? : ;` as it is the last statement in the `switch` block and the `default` case is already handled. LLVM,NVPTX,828,"The next statement in this code snippet is likely to be another `case` statement, as there are multiple `case` statements in the code and the current one is not the last one. It's also possible that the next statement could be a `default` statement, as there is a `default` statement in the code. However, without more context, it's difficult to say for sure what the next statement will be." LLVM,NVPTX,829,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `getDivF32Level` method and the values of the variables involved. However, based on the name of the method and the fact that it is a `const` method, it is likely that the next statement will be a return statement that returns the result of the `getDivF32Level` method. Without more information about the specific implementation of the `getDivF32Level` method, it is not possible to provide a more detailed prediction of" LLVM,NVPTX,830,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be a return statement, as the function `getI32Imm` is declared to return an `SDValue`. The return statement will likely be of the form `return `, where `` is an expression that evaluates to an `SDValue`. The expression `` is likely to be a call to the `getTargetConstant` method of the `CurDAG` object, passing in the `Imm` and `DL` parameters as arguments. The `getTargetConstant` method is declared to return an `SD" LLVM,NVPTX,831,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return SDValue(Imm, DL);`" LLVM,NVPTX,832,"The next statement of this code snippet is: return ""getPassName"";" LLVM,NVPTX,833,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the implementation of the `getPassName` method in the derived class. However, based on the syntax and the fact that the method is marked as `const`, it is likely that the next statement will be a return statement that returns a string representing the name of the pass." LLVM,NVPTX,834,"Based on the code snippet you provided, it appears to be a switch statement that is returning different values based on the input string. The next statement after the current one would be: case : return CmpMode :: GT ; This statement would return the value CmpMode :: GT if the input string is equal to the string literal ""GT""." LLVM,NVPTX,835,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `DAGToDAGISel` class and the `SelectionDAGISel` class. However, based on the names of the classes and the constructor parameters, it is likely that the next statement will be a call to the `SelectionDAGISel` constructor, which will initialize the `SelectionDAGISel` object with the given `TargetMachine` and `CodeGenOpt::Level` parameters. Here is an example of what the next statement might look like:" LLVM,NVPTX,836,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `Subtarget = &MF.getSubtargetSubtarget>();` This statement assigns the result of the `getSubtarget` method, which is a pointer to the `ISA_LIT` subtarget, to the `Subtarget` variable. The `getSubtarget` method is called on the `MachineFunction` object `MF`, and it returns a pointer to the subtarget of the machine function. The `ISA_LIT` template parameter is used to specify the type of the sub" LLVM,NVPTX,837,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet without knowing the context and the specific implementation of the `getSubtarget` method. However, based on the syntax and the fact that the method is called on an object of type `MF`, it is likely that the next statement will involve the `Subtarget` object that was just created. Some possible next statements could be: * Using the `Subtarget` object to perform some operation, such as setting a property or calling a method. * Storing the `Subtarget` object in a variable or data structure for later use." LLVM,NVPTX,838,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet without knowing the specific implementation of the `SelectADDRri` function. However, based on the name of the function and the parameters it takes, it appears to be related to selecting an address for a memory access operation. The `OpNode` parameter is likely a pointer to the current instruction being processed, and the `Addr` parameter is the address being accessed. The `Base` and `Offset` parameters are likely used to store the base address and offset of the memory access, respectively. Without knowing the specific implementation of the `Select" LLVM,NVPTX,839,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet without knowing the specific implementation of the `SelectADDRri64` function. However, based on the name of the function and the parameters it takes, it appears to be related to selecting an address for a 64-bit integer value. The `OpNode` parameter is likely a node in a directed acyclic graph (DAG) that represents the operation being performed, and the `Addr` parameter is the address of the memory location being accessed. The `Base` and `Offset` parameters are likely used to store the base address" LLVM,NVPTX,840,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `Base = CurDAG->getTargetFrameIndex(FIN->getIndex(), mvt);` This statement is executed if the `Addr` object's opcode is `` and the `SelectDirectAddr` function returns `true`. The `FIN` object is a `FrameIndexSDNode` object, and the `getIndex` method is called on it to get the frame index. This index is then passed to the `getTargetFrameIndex` method of `CurDAG` to get the base address" LLVM,NVPTX,841,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `if ( CN->getOpcode() == ) {`" LLVM,NVPTX,842,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet without knowing the specific implementation of the `SelectADDRsi64` function and the context in which it is being called. However, based on the name of the function and the parameters it takes, it appears to be related to selecting an address for a 64-bit integer value. Without more information, it is difficult to provide a more specific answer. If you have any additional context or details about the code snippet, I would be happy to try and help you further." LLVM,NVPTX,843,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `if (Addr.getOpcode() == ) {` This is because the `if` statement is checking the opcode of the `Addr` node, and if it is equal to ``, then the code inside the `if` block will be executed." LLVM,NVPTX,844,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `if (Addr.getOpcode() == ) {` This is because the `if` statement is checking the opcode of the `Addr` node, and if it is equal to ``, then the code inside the `if` block will be executed." LLVM,NVPTX,845,"The next statement in the code snippet is: `case ADDRESS_SPACE_SHARED :`" LLVM,NVPTX,846,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return false;` The `SelectDirectAddr` function is checking if the `getOpcode` of `N` is equal to `` or ``. If it is, it sets `Address` to `N` and returns `true`. Otherwise, it returns `false`." LLVM,NVPTX,847,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `SelectDirectAddr` function and the values of the variables `Op`, `Op0`, and `CurDAG`. However, based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the next statement after the `if` statement would be the `return` statement, which returns `false`." LLVM,NVPTX,848,"Based on the code snippet provided, it is difficult to predict the next statement with certainty. However, based on the context and the pattern of the code, it is likely that the next statement will be another `if` statement or a `return` statement. The `if` statement in the code snippet checks if `SelectADDRri` is true, and if it is, it executes the code inside the `if` block. If `SelectADDRri` is false, the code inside the `if` block will not be executed. Therefore, the next statement is likely to be another" LLVM,NVPTX,849,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the code depends on the value of `N` and the implementation of the `SDLoc` class. However, based on the syntax and the fact that `SDLoc` is a class, it is likely that the next statement will be an object creation expression, such as `SDLoc dl = new SDLoc(N);`." LLVM,NVPTX,850,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet without knowing the specific implementation of the `SelectTexSurfHandle` function and the structure of the `SDNode` class. However, based on the name of the function and the parameter it takes, it is likely that the next statement will be related to selecting a texture surface handle for the given `SDNode`. Here are a few possibilities: 1. The function may use the `SDNode` parameter to retrieve information about the texture surface, such as its dimensions, format, or other properties. 2. The function may use the `SD" LLVM,NVPTX,851,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet without knowing the specific implementation of the `SelectTexSurfHandle` function and the structure of the `SDNode` class. However, based on the name of the function and the parameter it takes, it is likely that the next statement will be related to selecting a texture surface handle for the given `SDNode`. Here are a few possibilities: 1. The function may use the `SDNode` parameter to retrieve information about the texture surface, such as its dimensions, format, or other properties. 2. The function may use the `SD" LLVM,NVPTX,852,"The next statement after the `if` block would be the `return` statement, which returns `false` if the condition in the `if` block is not met." LLVM,NVPTX,853,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet without knowing the context and the purpose of the code. However, based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the code is trying to load a constant value into a node in a directed acyclic graph (DAG). The `LoadConstF16` node is being created with the `getMachineNode` method, which is a method of the `CurDAG` object. The `ReplaceNode` method is then being called to replace the original node `N` with the new `LoadConstF16` node. Without more" LLVM,NVPTX,854,"Based on the code snippet provided, it is difficult to predict the next statement with certainty. However, based on the context and the patterns in the code, it is likely that the next statement will be a comparison or a check on the values in the `E0` and `E1` vectors. The code appears to be checking if the operands of a vector are used in a specific way, and if so, extracting the operands and storing them in the `E0` and `E1` vectors. The next statement is likely to be a check on the values in these vectors, such as" LLVM,NVPTX,855,"The next statement after the `switch` statement would be the `default` case, which returns `false`." LLVM,NVPTX,856,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `if ( ! LD ) return false;` This statement checks if the `LD` instruction was successfully created, and if not, returns `false` to indicate that the instruction could not be generated." LLVM,NVPTX,857,"Based on the code snippet you provided, it appears that the next statement will be: `VTs.push_back(MemVT.getSimpleVT().SimpleTy);` This is because the `switch` statement is checking the value of `VecSize`, and if it is equal to ``, it will push the value of `MemVT.getSimpleVT().SimpleTy` onto the `VTs` vector." LLVM,NVPTX,858,"Based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the next statement will be: `SDValue Ops[ ] = { Value, getI32Imm(isVolatile, dl), getI32Imm(CodeAddrSpace, dl), getI32Imm(vecType, dl), getI32Imm(toType, dl), getI32Imm(toTypeWidth, dl), Base, Offset, Chain };` This is because the previous `if` statement checked whether `SelectDirectAddr` was" LLVM,NVPTX,859,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `SDVTList RetVTs = CurDAG->getVTList(, );` This line retrieves a list of value types (VTList) for the return value of the machine instruction. The `getVTList` method is called on the `CurDAG` object, which is an instance of the `DAG` class. The method takes two arguments: the first is the opcode of the machine instruction, and the second is the value type of the return value" LLVM,NVPTX,860,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet without knowing the context and the purpose of the code. However, based on the syntax and the function calls, it appears that the code is trying to determine whether the target architecture uses the ""F32FTZ"" instruction for floating-point operations. The `Subtarget` object is being used to get the target lowering object, which is then being used to check if the target architecture uses the ""F32FTZ"" instruction. The `useF32FTZ` function is likely a member function of the target lowering object that returns" LLVM,NVPTX,861,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet without knowing the context and the purpose of the code. However, based on the syntax and the function calls, it appears that the code is trying to use the `Subtarget` object to get the `TargetLowering` object, and then use the `usePrecSqrtF32` function to perform a square root operation on a floating-point value. Here is a possible next statement: ``` return Subtarget->getTargetLowering()->usePrecSqrtF32(value); ``` This statement would" LLVM,NVPTX,862,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the `useShortPointers()` method is not specified. However, based on the name of the method, it is likely that it sets a flag or a configuration option that affects the behavior of the `TM` object. Without more information about the `TM` class and the `useShortPointers()` method, it is not possible to provide a more specific answer." LLVM,NVPTX,863,"The next statement after the `if` block will be the `return false` statement. The `if` block checks if `Src` is null, and if it is, the function returns `false`. If `Src` is not null, the `if` block checks if `Src` is a pointer type, and if it is, it returns the address space of the pointer. If `Src` is not a pointer type, the function returns `false`. Therefore, the next statement after the `if` block will be the `return false` statement, which will be" LLVM,NVPTX,864,"The next statement after the `if` statement is: `Src = mN -> getSrcValue ( ) ;` This statement assigns the result of the `getSrcValue()` method of the `MemIntrinsicSDNode` object `mN` to the variable `Src`." LLVM,NVPTX,865,"The next statement in the code snippet is: `case llvm::ADDRESS_SPACE_PARAM: return ::PARAM;`" LLVM,NVPTX,866,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return :: GENERIC;` Explanation: The code snippet is checking the address space of a pointer type, and returning a string literal based on the address space. If the address space is not one of the recognized values, it returns the default value of ` :: GENERIC`." LLVM,NVPTX,867,"Based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the next statement will be: `doFMAF64AGG = ( OptLevel > ) && Subtarget . hasFMAF64 ( ) && ( FMAContractLevel == ) ;` This statement is assigning the value of `doFMAF64AGG` based on the value of `OptLevel`, `Subtarget`, and `FMAContractLevel`. It is checking if `OptLevel` is greater than a certain value, and if `Subtarget`" LLVM,NVPTX,868,"Based on the code snippet you provided, it appears to be a switch statement that is checking the value of a string literal. The next statement that will be executed is the one that matches the value of the string literal. Without knowing the value of the string literal, it is not possible to predict the next statement that will be executed. However, based on the code snippet you provided, it appears that the next statement will be one of the following: * `ResNode = SelectLoadVector(N);` * `ResNode = SelectLDGLDUVector(N);` * `ResNode = Select" LLVM,NVPTX,869,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `if (Addr.getOpcode() == || Addr.getOpcode() == ) return false;` This statement checks if the opcode of the address `Addr` is equal to `` or ``. If it is, the function returns `false`." LLVM,NVPTX,870,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty because it depends on the specific values of the variables and the behavior of the functions being called. However, based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the next statement will be: `Offset = CurDAG->getTargetConstant(, mvt);` This is because the code checks the opcode of the `Addr` object and if it is equal to `` or ``, it returns `false`. If the opcode is not equal to" LLVM,NVPTX,871,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the program depends on the specific values of the variables and the implementation of the `Addr` and `SelectDirectAddr` functions. However, based on the information provided, we can make some educated guesses about the possible next statements. The `Addr` function is likely to return a value of type `SDValue`, which is a type that represents a value in the program's data structure. The `getOperand` method is then called on this value, passing in the integer literal" LLVM,NVPTX,872,"This code snippet is a part of the LLVM compiler's code generation phase, specifically the DAGToDAGISel class. It is responsible for selecting the appropriate memory operand for an inline assembly instruction. The code snippet is a method called `SelectInlineAsmMemoryOperand`, which takes three parameters: * `Op`: The operand to be selected. * `ConstraintCode`: The constraint code for the operand. * `OutOps`: A vector of selected operands. The method first checks if the constraint code is 'm', which indicates that the" LLVM,NVPTX,873,"Based on the code snippet provided, it is difficult to predict the next statement with certainty. However, we can make some educated guesses based on the context. The code snippet appears to be part of a function that is generating machine code for a specific instruction set architecture (ISA). The function is using a switch statement to select the appropriate instruction opcode based on the target vector type (TargetVT) and other factors. Based on the information provided, it is likely that the next statement will be a case statement within the switch statement, selecting the appropriate opcode for the current TargetVT." LLVM,NVPTX,874,"Based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the next statement will be: Opcode = ; This is because the code is currently in a switch statement that is checking the value of NumElts, and the default case is to return NULL. However, the code is currently in the case where NumElts is equal to , and the next statement is to set the Opcode variable to a specific value based on the value of Mem->getMemoryVT()->getSimpleVT()->SimpleTy." LLVM,NVPTX,875,"Based on the code snippet you provided, it seems like the next statement after `case :` would be `switch ( Mem -> getMemoryVT ( ) . getSimpleVT ( ) . SimpleTy ) {`. This is because the `switch` statement is checking the value of `Mem -> getMemoryVT ( ) . getSimpleVT ( ) . SimpleTy`, and the next statement after the `case :` label is a `switch` statement that checks the value of the same expression. It's worth noting that" LLVM,NVPTX,876,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `if (A && A->onlyReadsMemory() && A->hasNoAliasAttr()) {`" LLVM,NVPTX,877,The next statement after `return false ;` is `case :`. LLVM,NVPTX,878,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `if ( !LD ) return false;` This statement checks if the `LD` instruction was successfully created, and if not, returns `false`. If the `LD` instruction was successfully created, the code continues to the next statement." LLVM,NVPTX,879,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `case : Opcode = pickOpcodeForVT ( EltVT . getSimpleVT ( ) . SimpleTy , , , , , , , , ) ; break ;`" LLVM,NVPTX,880,"Based on the code snippet you provided, it appears that the next statement will be: `SDValue CvtNone = CurDAG->getTargetConstant(::NONE, DL, ); SDNode *Cvt = CurDAG->getMachineNode(, DL, , Ops[], CvtNone); Ops[] = SDValue(Cvt, );` This statement" LLVM,NVPTX,881,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `Ops.push_back(CurDAG->getTargetConstant(ParamVal, DL, ));` This line adds a new element to the `Ops` vector, which is a vector of `SDValue` objects. The element being added is a constant value obtained from the `CurDAG` object using the `getTargetConstant` method, with the `ParamVal` and `DL` parameters. The `DL` parameter is a `DebugLoc` object that contains debugging information for the current" LLVM,NVPTX,882,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `if (PointerSize == ) {`" LLVM,NVPTX,883,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `case : Opcode = pickOpcodeForVT(EltVT.getSimpleVT().SimpleTy, , , , None, , , , None); break;`" LLVM,NVPTX,884,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet without knowing the specific values of the variables and the implementation of the functions being called. However, based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the next statement will be an `if` statement that checks the value of `PointerSize` and selects an appropriate opcode based on that value." LLVM,NVPTX,885,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return ;` This is because the `else` clause of the `if` statement is executed when the condition `TM.Options.UnsafeFPMath` is not true. In this case, the function returns a numerical literal value." LLVM,NVPTX,886,"The next statement in this code snippet is: doMulWide = ( OptLevel > ) ;" LLVM,NVPTX,887,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be: doFMAF32AGG = ( OptLevel > ) && Subtarget . hasFMAF32 ( ) && ( FMAContractLevel == ) ; This is because the code snippet defines two variables, `doFMAF32AGG` and `doFMAF64AGG`, and assigns them the result of a logical AND operation between the result of a comparison and the result of a method call. The method call is `Subtarget." LLVM,NVPTX,888,"Based on the code snippet provided, it is difficult to predict the next statement with certainty. However, based on the pattern of the switch cases, it is likely that the next statement will be another case statement for a different opcode. The switch statement is checking the opcode of the node `N` and selecting a specific action based on the opcode. The actions are represented by the `ResNode` variable, which is assigned a value based on the opcode. The code snippet you provided shows a few different opcodes being handled, including ``, ` : switch ( MemVT . getSimpleVT ( ) . SimpleTy ) { default : return NULL ; case : Opc = ; break ; case : Opc = getAttributes ( ) . getAttribute ( AttributeSet :: FunctionIndex , ) . getValueAsString ( ) == ) ;` This statement is a return statement that returns a boolean value indicating whether the function has the specified attribute or not. The return value is determined by the result of the comparison between the value of the attribute and the specified string literal. If the values are equal, the function returns `true`, otherwise it returns `false`." LLVM,NVPTX,892,"The next statement of this code snippet is: return UsePrecSqrtF32;" LLVM,NVPTX,893,"The next statement after the `if` block is: `return (PT->getAddressSpace() == spN);` This statement returns `true` if the address space of the pointer type `PT` is equal to `spN`, and `false` otherwise." LLVM,NVPTX,894,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return :: GENERIC;` Explanation: The code snippet is a `switch` statement that checks the value of `PT -> getAddressSpace()` and returns a string literal based on the value. The `switch` statement has a `default` case that returns a string literal for the `GENERIC` address space. Therefore, the next statement of the code snippet is to return the string literal for the `GENERIC` address space." LLVM,NVPTX,895,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet without knowing the specific values of the variables and the behavior of the functions being called. However, based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the next statement will be: `Val = AndLHS;` This is because the code snippet is currently inside the `else` block of the `if (LHS->getOpcode() == )` statement, and the next statement after the `else` block is `Val = AndLHS;`." LLVM,NVPTX,896,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet without knowing the specific values of the variables and the implementation of the functions being called. However, based on the code snippet, it appears that the next statement will be a call to the `getTargetConstant` method of the `CurDAG` object, passing in the `OuterShiftAmt - InnerShiftAmt` and `` as arguments." LLVM,NVPTX,897,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific values of the variables and the behavior of the functions being called. However, based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the next statement after the `if` statement will be the `break` statement. The `if` statement checks whether the `SelectADDRri` function returns `true` for the current node, and if so, it pushes the operands of the node onto the `OutOps` vector and returns `false`. If the `if` statement is not satisfied, the" LLVM,NVPTX,898,"Based on the code snippet you provided, it appears that the next statement will be: `return nullptr;` This is because the `switch` statement is checking the value of `IID`, which is a constant integer value, and the `default` case is executed when the value of `IID` does not match any of the other cases. In this case, the value of `IID` is not equal to ``, so the `default` case is executed and the function returns `nullptr`." LLVM,NVPTX,899,"Based on the code snippet you provided, it appears to be a switch statement with multiple cases. The next statement after the first case would be the break statement, which would exit the switch statement and continue executing the code after the switch statement. However, without more context, it's difficult to say for sure what the next statement would be. The code snippet you provided is incomplete and doesn't include the full switch statement or the surrounding code." LLVM,NVPTX,900,"Based on the code snippet you provided, it is difficult to predict the next statement with certainty. However, we can make some educated guesses based on the context. The code appears to be part of a function that is processing a list of operations (Ops) and a flag (Flag). The function is also using a switch statement to determine the opcode based on the number of elements (NumElts) and the memory virtual type (Mem). Based on the structure of the switch statement, it is likely that the next statement will be a case statement that handles a specific opcode. However," LLVM,NVPTX,901,"Based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the next statement will be: case : switch ( Mem -> getMemoryVT ( ) . getSimpleVT ( ) . SimpleTy ) { default : return nullptr ; case : Opcode = ; break ; case : Opcode = ; break ; case : Opcode = ; break ; case : Opcode = getMachineNode(, SDLoc(N), , GlobalVal);` This statement is returning a machine node from the current DAG, with the specified string literal as the first argument, the SDLoc of the input node N as the second argument, and the GlobalVal as the third argument. The machine node is created using the `getMachineNode` method of the current DAG." LLVM,NVPTX,903,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `CurDAG` class and the `getMachineNode` method. However, based on the syntax and the fact that the method is called with four arguments, it is likely that the next statement will be a call to the `getMachineNode` method with the specified arguments. Here is a possible next statement: ``` return CurDAG->getMachineNode(, SDLoc(N), , GlobalVal); ``` This" LLVM,NVPTX,904,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return FtzEnabled;` Explanation: The code snippet is checking if the `FtzEnabled` flag is set to true, and if it is, it returns `FtzEnabled`. If `FtzEnabled` is not set to true, it means that the `FtzEnabled` flag is not set, and the code snippet will return the value of the `FtzEnabled` flag, which is `false`." LLVM,NVPTX,905,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return false;` Explanation: The code snippet is checking if the function `F` has a specific attribute with a certain value. If the attribute is present and has the expected value, the function returns the value of the attribute. Otherwise, it returns `false`. In this case, the code is checking if the function `F` has an attribute with the name ``. If the attribute is present and has the value ``, the function returns `true`. Otherwise, it returns `false" LLVM,NVPTX,906,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty because it depends on the specific values of the variables and the behavior of the functions called. However, based on the information provided, it appears that the code is checking whether the `UsePrecSqrtF32` flag has been set more than a certain number of times (represented by ``). If this condition is true, the code will execute the statement inside the `if` block, which is currently empty. Therefore, the next statement of this code snippet is likely to be the statement following the `" LLVM,NVPTX,907,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `allowFMA` method and the context in which it is called. However, based on the name of the method and the fact that it is a member of the `DAGToDAGISel` class, it is likely that the method returns a boolean value indicating whether the `DAGToDAGISel` instance is allowed to use the FMA (Fused Multiply-Add) instruction." LLVM,NVPTX,908,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `getTargetLowering()` function and the `TargetLowering` class. However, based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the `getTargetLowering()` function is being called to retrieve a pointer to a `TargetLowering` object, which is then being cast to a `TargetLowering*` pointer and stored in the `TL` variable. Without more information about the implementation of the `getTargetLowering()` function and the `TargetLowering` class," LLVM,NVPTX,909,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `Src = mN->getMemOperand()->getValue(); } else if (MemSDNode* mN = dyn_cast(N)) { if (spN == && mN->getMemOperand()->getPseudoValue()) return true;`." LLVM,NVPTX,910,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return :: GENERIC ;` This statement is executed when the `switch` statement does not match any of the `case` statements. In this case, the `default` statement is executed, which returns the string literal ""GENERIC""." LLVM,NVPTX,911,"The next statement of this code snippet is: case llvm::ADDRESS_SPACE_GLOBAL: return ::GLOBAL;" LLVM,NVPTX,912,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be the initialization of the `doMulWide` field, which is a boolean value indicating whether the `MulWide` instruction should be used. The value of `doMulWide` is determined by the `OptLevel` parameter, which is a numerical value that controls the level of optimization. If `OptLevel` is greater than a certain threshold (represented by `` in the code snippet), then `doMulWide` is set to `true`, otherwise it is set to `false`." LLVM,NVPTX,913,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific values of the variables and the behavior of the `Subtarget` object. However, based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the next statement will be: `Opc = Subtarget.is64Bit() ? : ;` This is because the `switch` statement is checking the value of `DstAddrSpace`, and if it is equal to `ADDRESS_SPACE_LOCAL`, it will execute the code" LLVM,NVPTX,914,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `if (isMask_64(MaskVal)) {`" LLVM,NVPTX,915,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `switch (SourceVT) {`" LLVM,NVPTX,916,"Based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the next statement will be a `switch` statement that checks the value of `SourceVT` and sets the value of `Opcode` accordingly. Here is a breakdown of the code snippet: * `SDValue Chain = N -> getOperand ( ) ;`: This line retrieves the operand at index `` from the node `N` and stores it in the variable `Chain`. * `SDValue N1 = N -> getOperand ( " LLVM,NVPTX,917,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific input and the implementation of the `SelectLoad` and `SelectStore` functions. However, based on the code snippet, it appears that the `SelectLoad` function is called with the argument `N` and the result is assigned to `ResNode`. If `ResNode` is not null, the function returns `ResNode`. If `ResNode` is null, the `SelectStore` function is called with the argument `N` and the result is assigned to `ResNode`. If `ResNode`" LLVM,NVPTX,918,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `case : Opcode = ; break ;` This is the first case statement in the switch block, which sets the `Opcode` variable to a specific value based on the `TargetVT` variable. The value of `Opcode` is then used to create a machine node in the next line of code." LLVM,NVPTX,919,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `if (Src && isa(Src)) {`" LLVM,NVPTX,920,"The next statement of this code snippet is: case : return ;" LLVM,NVPTX,921,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be: `allowFMA = ( FMAContractLevel >= ) || UseFMADInstruction;` This statement sets the `allowFMA` variable to `true` if the `FMAContractLevel` is greater than or equal to a certain value (represented by ``), or if the `UseFMADInstruction` flag is set to `true`." LLVM,NVPTX,922,"The next statement after the `switch` block is `if (ResNode) return ResNode;`. The `switch` block is checking the value of `N->getOpcode()` and setting `ResNode` to a different value based on the opcode. The `if` statement at the end is checking if `ResNode` is not null, and if it's not, it returns `ResNode`. So, the next statement after the `switch` block is the `if` statement." LLVM,NVPTX,923,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet without knowing the context and the specific values of the variables involved. However, based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the next statement could be: `Offset = CurDAG->getTargetConstant(CN->getZExtValue(), mvt);` This statement is assigning the result of the `getTargetConstant` method to the `Offset` variable, using the value of the `CN` variable as an argument. The `getTargetConstant` method is likely to return a constant value of a specific type, which is then" LLVM,NVPTX,924,"Based on the code snippet you provided, it appears that the next statement after `if ( Addr . getOpcode ( ) == ) {` is `if ( SelectDirectAddr ( Addr . getOperand ( ) , Addr ) ) {`. Therefore, the next statement of the code snippet you provided is: ``` if ( SelectDirectAddr ( Addr . getOperand ( ) , Addr ) ) { ```" LLVM,NVPTX,925,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `Base = Addr.getOperand(0);`" LLVM,NVPTX,926,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `if ( SelectDirectAddr(base, Base) ) {` This is because the `if` statement is checking whether the `SelectDirectAddr` function returns `true` for the given `base` and `Base` arguments. If it does, then the code inside the `if` block will be executed." LLVM,NVPTX,927,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return ( SelectDirectAddr ( N . getOperand ( ) . getOperand ( ) , Address ) ) ;` This statement is executed if the `if` condition is true, which means that the `IID` value is equal to the string literal ``, and the `getOpcode()` method of the operand at index `` returns the string literal ``. The `SelectDirectAddr()`" LLVM,NVPTX,928,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it appears to be a fragment of a larger program and the context is not provided. However, based on the syntax and structure of the code, it appears to be a part of a function that is processing a directed acyclic graph (DAG) and generating a list of operations to be performed. The code snippet appears to be checking if the current node in the DAG is a ""SelectADDRri"" node, and if so, it is pushing the operands of the node onto a list called ""OutOps""." LLVM,NVPTX,929,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be: `Retval = CurDAG->getTargetConstant(, );` This is because the `if` statement checks whether `N.getOpcode()` is equal to `` or not, and if it is, it sets `Retval` to the result of `CurDAG->getTargetConstant(, )`. If `N.getOpcode()` is not equal to `" LLVM,NVPTX,930,"Based on the code snippet you provided, it appears that the next statement will be: case : switch ( MemVT . getSimpleVT ( ) . SimpleTy ) { default : return false ; case : Opc = ; break ; case : Opc = ; break ; case : Opc = ; break ; case : Opc = ;" LLVM,NVPTX,931,"Based on the code snippet you provided, it appears to be a switch statement that is checking the value of `Mem -> getMemoryVT ( ) . getSimpleVT ( ) . SimpleTy` and setting the value of `Opcode` based on the result. The next statement after the code snippet you provided would be `case : switch ( Mem -> getMemoryVT ( ) . getSimpleVT ( ) . SimpleTy ) { default : return false ; case : Opcode = ; break ; case getAddressSpace()) {` This is because the code is checking the address space of the pointer type `PT` using the `getAddressSpace()` method, and then switching based on the result." LLVM,NVPTX,933,"Based on the code snippet you provided, it appears that the next statement will be: `return :: PARAM;` This is because the `switch` statement is checking the value of `PT->getAddressSpace()`, and the `case` statement for `llvm::ADDRESS_SPACE_PARAM` is the next one that has not been encountered yet. Therefore, the code will execute the statement associated with that `case` and return the value ` :: PARAM;`." LLVM,NVPTX,934,"Based on the code snippet you provided, it appears to be a switch statement that is selecting a node based on the value of `N`. The next statement after the `break` statement would be the `default` case, which is not shown in the code snippet you provided. Therefore, the next statement of this code snippet would be the `default` case, which is not shown in the code snippet you provided." LLVM,NVPTX,935,"Based on the code snippet you provided, it is difficult to predict the next statement with certainty. However, we can make some educated guesses based on the structure of the code. The code appears to be part of a switch statement that is checking the value of `N->getOpcode()` and then performing different actions based on the result. The `default` case returns `NULL`, while the other cases appear to be setting the value of `Opcode` to a specific value based on the result of `RetVT->getSimpleVT()->SimpleTy`. Based on this information, it" LLVM,NVPTX,936,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `LD = CurDAG->getMachineNode(Opcode, DL, N->getVTList(), Ops);` This statement is a function call to `getMachineNode` on the `CurDAG` object, passing in the `Opcode`, `DL`, `N->getVTList()`, and `Ops` as arguments. The function call returns a value of type `SDValue`, which is assigned to the variable `LD`." LLVM,NVPTX,937,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `switch (TargetVT) {`" LLVM,NVPTX,938,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `if ( Subtarget . is64Bit ( ) ) { switch ( SourceVT ) { case : Opcode = ; break ; case : Opcode = ; break ; case : Opcode = ; break ; case : Opcode = ; break ; case : Opcode = is64Bit ( ) ? : ; break ;`" LLVM,NVPTX,941,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `Opc = Subtarget -> is64Bit ( ) ? : ;` This is because the `switch` statement is checking the value of `SrcAddrSpace` and setting `Opc` to a different value depending on the value of `SrcAddrSpace`. If `SrcAddrSpace` is equal to `ADDRESS_SPACE_GLOBAL`, `ADDRESS_SPACE_SHARED`, `ADDRESS_SPACE_CONST`, or" LLVM,NVPTX,942,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `SDValue Ops[ ] = { getI32Imm ( isVolatile ) , getI32Imm ( codeAddrSpace ) , getI32Imm ( vecType ) , getI32Imm ( fromType ) , getI32Imm ( fromTypeWidth ) , Base , Offset , Chain } ;`" LLVM,NVPTX,943,"Based on the code snippet provided, it appears to be a part of a compiler or interpreter that is generating machine code for a specific instruction set architecture (ISA). The code is using a library or framework that provides a set of functions and classes for working with the ISA, including a class called `SDNode` that represents a node in a directed acyclic graph (DAG) representing the instructions to be executed. The code is attempting to generate a machine code instruction for a store operation, which is represented by the `StoreSDNode` class. The instruction is being generated for a specific addressing mode," LLVM,NVPTX,944,"Based on the code snippet you provided, it appears to be a switch statement in a programming language. The switch statement is checking the value of a variable `N` and based on that value, it is executing a different block of code. The first case is checking if the value of `N` is equal to a string literal, and if it is, it is executing the `SelectIntrinsicNoChain` function with `N` as an argument. The second case is checking if the value of `N` is equal to a different string literal, and if it is, it is executing the `" LLVM,NVPTX,945,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific values of the variables and the behavior of the functions being called. However, based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the next statement will be the assignment of the result of the `push_back` function to the `Ops` variable. The `push_back` function is called on the `Ops` variable with the `TexRef` and `SampRef` variables as arguments, and then the `Ops` variable is assigned the result of the `push_back` function" LLVM,NVPTX,946,"Based on the code snippet provided, it is difficult to predict the next statement with certainty. However, based on the context and the structure of the code, it is likely that the next statement will be a case statement or a switch statement that handles different address spaces. The code snippet is part of a function called `SelectAddrSpaceCast` that takes an `SDNode` pointer called `N` as an argument. The function appears to be responsible for selecting the appropriate address space cast operation based on the source and destination address spaces. The function first retrieves the source and destination address spaces from the `" LLVM,NVPTX,947,"Based on the code snippet you provided, it appears to be a part of a function that is handling different cases based on the type of a variable. The function is using a switch statement to check the type of the variable and perform different actions based on that type. The code snippet you provided is incomplete, so it's difficult to predict exactly what the next statement will be. However, based on the context, it seems likely that the next statement will be a case statement or a default statement, as these are the two types of statements that are typically used in a switch statement. If the next statement is a" LLVM,NVPTX,948,"Based on the code snippet you provided, it appears to be a part of a function that is handling memory operations. The function takes a `Node` parameter and performs different operations based on the opcode of the node. The first switch statement checks the opcode of the node and sets the `VecSize` variable to a specific value based on the opcode. The second switch statement checks the `VecSize` variable and sets the `Opc` variable to a specific value based on the `MemVT` variable, which is the memory vector type. The `Opc` variable is then used to" LLVM,NVPTX,949,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `Variant = WMMA_VARIANT_ARI64_STRIDE;` This is because the `if` statement checks if `Stride` is true, and if it is, it sets `Variant` to `WMMA_VARIANT_ARI64_STRIDE`. If `Stride` is false, the `else if` statement is executed, which sets `Variant` to `WMMA_VARIANT_AVAR_STRIDE`." LLVM,NVPTX,950,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be a comparison or a logical operation, as the code is checking the values of the operands and setting flags based on those values. Here are some possible next statements: * `if (ValueOp == MaskOp) { ... }` * `if (ValueOp != MaskOp) { ... }` * `if (ValueOp > MaskOp) { ... }` * `if (ValueOp < MaskOp) { ... }` * `if (ValueOp >= MaskOp) { ... }` * `if (" LLVM,NVPTX,951,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `if (ValueConst->getZExtValue() == 0) {`" LLVM,NVPTX,952,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `SelectMatchAll` function and the values of the `` cases. However, based on the syntax and the fact that the function is called with the argument `N`, it is likely that the next statement will be a call to the `tryLDGLDU` function with the argument `N`." LLVM,NVPTX,953,"The code snippet you provided is a part of a function called `tryIntrinsicChain` that is part of the LLVM compiler. The function is trying to determine if a given instruction is an intrinsic instruction and, if so, which intrinsic instruction it is. The code is checking the value of the `IID` (Instruction ID) operand of the `SDNode` object `N` to determine the intrinsic instruction. If the `IID` is a valid intrinsic instruction, the function will return `true` and the `tryWMMA_LDST` function will be called" LLVM,NVPTX,954,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the code depends on the specific values of the variables and the input to the program. However, based on the syntax and the fact that the code is using a `switch` statement, it is likely that the next statement will be the body of one of the `case` labels. The `switch` statement will evaluate the value of the variable `x` and execute the code in the body of the `case` label that matches the value of `x`. Without more information about the specific values of" LLVM,NVPTX,955,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `Ops.push_back(Chain);` This is because the `for` loop that was previously executing has now completed, and the next statement to be executed is the one that pushes the `Chain` operand onto the `Ops` vector." LLVM,NVPTX,956,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return true;` Explanation: The code snippet is checking if a given value `N` is an invariant, and if it is, it returns `true`. If `N` is not an invariant, it checks if the function `F` is a kernel function, and if it is not, it returns `false`. If `F` is a kernel function, it gets the underlying objects of the memory operand of `N` and stores them in a small vector `Objs`. Then, it iterates over the objects in `Ob" LLVM,NVPTX,957,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `if (N->isInvariant()) return true;` This statement checks if the memory operand of the `MemSDNode` is invariant, meaning that it does not change during the execution of the program. If the memory operand is invariant, the function `canLowerToLDG` returns `true`, indicating that the memory operand can be lowered to a load from global memory using the `LDG` instruction." LLVM,NVPTX,958,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `GetUnderlyingObjects` function and the values of the variables `N`, `Objs`, and `F`. However, based on the names of the variables and the function being called, it is likely that the next statement will be related to processing the objects in the `Objs` vector. One possible next statement could be: ``` for (auto &obj : Objs) { // do something with obj } ``` This would iterate over the objects in" LLVM,NVPTX,959,"The next statement after the `for` loop is `return true;`. The `for` loop iterates over the `Objs` vector and checks each element `Obj` using the `dyn_cast` function. If the cast is successful, the resulting pointer `A` is checked for certain properties using the `onlyReadsMemory` and `hasNoAliasAttr` functions. If any of these checks fail, the function returns `false`. If all checks pass, the function returns `true`. Therefore, the next statement after the `for` loop is the return statement that returns" LLVM,NVPTX,960,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `Ops.push_back(CurDAG->getTargetConstant(OffsetVal, DL, ));` This is because the code is currently inside the `case :` block, which is handling the case where `NumElts` is equal to ``. The next statement in this block is to push the `OffsetVal` constant onto the `Ops` vector using the `push_back` method." LLVM,NVPTX,961,"Based on the code snippet provided, it is difficult to predict the next statement with certainty. However, based on the context and the structure of the code, it appears that the next statement will be a case statement within the switch statement. The switch statement is checking the value of `NumElts` and `Mem->getMemoryVT()->getSimpleVT()->SimpleTy` to determine the value of `Opcode`. The case statements within the switch statement are checking the value of `NumElts` and `Mem->getMemoryVT()->getSimpleVT()->SimpleTy` to determine the value" LLVM,NVPTX,962,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet without knowing the specific implementation of the `TargetLowering` class and the `Subtarget` class. However, based on the names of the methods and classes involved, it appears that this code is checking whether the target architecture supports the use of the Fused Multiply-Add (FMA) instruction. The `Subtarget` class is likely a subclass of the `Target` class, and it provides information about the target architecture, such as the name of the target, the vendor, and the architecture version. The `getTargetLowering()` method" LLVM,NVPTX,963,"Based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the next statement will be: `case : switch ( RetVT . getSimpleVT ( ) . SimpleTy ) { default : return NULL ; case : Opcode = ; break ; case : Opcode = ; break ; case : Opcode = ; break ; case : Opcode = ;" LLVM,NVPTX,964,"Based on the code snippet provided, it is difficult to predict the next statement with certainty. However, based on the context and the patterns in the code, it is likely that the next statement will be a continuation of the `if` statement that checks whether the function is a kernel function. The code is checking if the function is a kernel function by calling the `isKernelFunction` function on the `F` object, which is likely a function pointer. If the function is a kernel function, the code then checks if the argument `A` only reads memory and has the `noalias` attribute." LLVM,NVPTX,965,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `for (auto &Obj : Objs) {` This is because the `GetUnderlyingObjects` function returns a `SmallVector` of `Value *` objects, and the code snippet is iterating over this vector using a range-based `for` loop. The loop variable `Obj` will be a `Value *` object representing the underlying object being accessed by the memory operation." LLVM,NVPTX,966,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return SDValue(Imm);` This statement creates a new `SDValue` object with the value of `Imm` and returns it." LLVM,NVPTX,967,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return SDValue(Imm);` This statement creates a new `SDValue` object with the value of `Imm` and returns it." LLVM,NVPTX,968,"Based on the code snippet provided, it is difficult to predict the next statement with certainty. However, we can make some educated guesses based on the context and the patterns we see in the code. Firstly, it appears that the code is working with a machine language and is trying to generate instructions for a specific architecture. The `pickOpcodeForVT` function suggests that the code is trying to select an opcode based on the value type and the target architecture. Secondly, the code is using a `SDValue` object to represent a value in the machine language. The `SDValue" LLVM,NVPTX,969,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the code depends on the value of the `OptLevel` variable, which is not specified in the code snippet. However, based on the code snippet, it appears that the `if` statement is checking whether the `OptLevel` variable is equal to a specific value (represented by `` in the code snippet). If the `OptLevel` variable is equal to this value, the code will return `false`. Otherwise, the code will continue executing. Without more information" LLVM,NVPTX,970,"The next statement after the given code snippet is: `return allowUnsafeFPMath(MF);` This is because the `if` statement checks if `OptLevel` is equal to ``, and if it is, it returns `false`. If `OptLevel` is not equal to ``, then the next statement is executed, which is the `if` statement that checks if `MF.getTarget().Options.AllowFPOpFusion` is equal to `FPOpFusion::Fast`. If it is, then the function" LLVM,NVPTX,971,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return true;`" LLVM,NVPTX,972,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `ValueVTs[Idx] = ValueVTs[Idx + NumElts - 1];` This statement assigns the value of the `ValueVTs` array at index `Idx + NumElts - 1` to the `ValueVTs` array at index `Idx`." LLVM,NVPTX,973,"Based on the code snippet you provided, it appears to be a part of a function that is checking the type and number of elements in a vector. The next statement of the code snippet is likely to be: `EltVT = ;` This statement assigns the value of `` to the variable `EltVT`. The value of `` is not specified in the code snippet you provided, so it is not possible to determine its exact value. However, based on the context of the code, it appears to be" LLVM,NVPTX,974,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `ValueVTs.push_back(EltVT);` This statement adds the element type `EltVT` to the `ValueVTs` vector." LLVM,NVPTX,975,"This code snippet is checking if the callee instruction is a call instruction and if it has a specified alignment. If the callee instruction is a call instruction and it has the specified alignment, the function returns the alignment. Therefore, the next statement of this code snippet would be: * If the callee instruction is a call instruction and it has the specified alignment, the function returns the alignment. * If the callee instruction is not a call instruction or it does not have the specified alignment, the function does not return anything." LLVM,NVPTX,976,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet without knowing the specific values of the variables and the behavior of the functions being called. However, based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the next statement will be: `CalleeV = cast < ConstantExpr > ( CalleeV ) -> getOperand ( ) ;` This statement is inside the `while` loop, and it is executed only if the condition `isa < ConstantExpr > ( CalleeV )` is true. The statement assigns the result of calling the `getOperand" LLVM,NVPTX,977,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific inputs and the behavior of the `UsePrecDivF32` and `getTargetMachine` functions. However, based on the code snippet, it appears that the next statement will be one of the following: * `return UsePrecDivF32;` * `return ;` The first statement will return the value of the `UsePrecDivF32` function, which is not defined in the code snippet provided. The second statement will return" LLVM,NVPTX,978,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of the code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `UsePrecDivF32` function and the `getTargetMachine` function. However, based on the context, it is likely that the next statement will be a return statement, as the `UsePrecDivF32` function is called and its return value is used in the `if` statement. Therefore, the next statement is likely to be: ``` return UsePrecDivF32(getTargetMachine().Options.UnsafeFPMath" LLVM,NVPTX,979,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return TargetLoweringBase :: getPreferredVectorAction ( VT ) ;` This statement returns the result of the `getPreferredVectorAction` method of the `TargetLoweringBase` class, which is called with the `VT` parameter. The `getPreferredVectorAction` method is not defined in the code snippet you provided, so it is not possible to determine what it does or what it returns." LLVM,NVPTX,980,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return TypeSplitVector;` The first `if` statement checks if the number of elements in the vector is not equal to `` and the scalar type is equal to ``. If this condition is true, the function returns `TypeSplitVector`. The second `if` statement checks if the vector type is equal to ``. If this condition is true, the function returns `TypeLegal`. If neither of these conditions is true, the function returns the result of calling `" LLVM,NVPTX,981,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `SDValue Res = DAG.getNode(ISD::FP_TO_FP16, DL, VT, Operand);` This statement is creating a new `SDValue` object called `Res` using the `getNode` method of the `DAG` object. The `getNode` method is used to create a new node in the DAG, and the first argument `ISD::FP_TO_FP16` specifies the type of node to create. The second argument `DL` is the debug location" LLVM,NVPTX,982,"Based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the next statement will be a call to the `MakeIntrinsicCall` lambda function with the argument `""llvm.x86.fptrunc.f32.f64""` (assuming that the `Reciprocal` variable is false and the `ExtraSteps` variable is less than or equal to 1). The `MakeIntrinsicCall` lambda function takes a single argument, which is a string literal representing the name of an intrinsic function. It returns a node representing a call to that intrinsic function with" LLVM,NVPTX,983,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `Type * PTy = dyn_cast < PointerType > ( Ty ) ;` This line casts the `Type` object `Ty` to a `PointerType` object, which is a subclass of `Type`. The `dyn_cast` function is used to perform a dynamic cast, which allows the code to check if the cast is valid at runtime. If the cast is not valid, the function returns `nullptr`." LLVM,NVPTX,984,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `if (STy->isLiteral()) return false;` This statement checks if the `StructType` `STy` is a literal type, and if it is, it returns `false`." LLVM,NVPTX,985,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the code depends on the specific values of the string literals and the input provided to the program. However, based on the syntax of the code, it appears that the code is using a switch statement to match the input string against a series of string literals. The next statement after the switch statement would likely be the code that is executed if none of the cases match the input string. Without more information about the specific values of the string literals and the input provided to the program, it is not" LLVM,NVPTX,986,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the code depends on the specific values of the string literals and the input provided to the program. However, based on the syntax of the code, it appears that the code is using a switch statement to match the input string against a series of string literals. The next statement after the switch statement would likely be the code that is executed if none of the cases match the input string. Without more information about the specific values of the string literals and the input provided to the program, it is not" LLVM,NVPTX,987,"The next statement after the `if` statement is the `return` statement. The `if` statement checks if the following conditions are true: * `Op -> getValueType ( )` is equal to `` * `Op -> getOperand ( )` is an instance of `ConstantFPSDNode` * `Op -> getOperand ( )` is an instance of `ConstantFPSDNode` If any of these conditions are false, the" LLVM,NVPTX,988,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `SDValue Const = DAG.getConstant(E1.zext().shl()|E0.zext(), SDLoc(Op), );` This statement is creating a new `SDValue` object named `Const` and initializing it with the result of the `DAG.getConstant()` method. The method takes several arguments: * `E1.zext(, dl, EltVT, SubOp, DAG.getIntPtrConstant(j, dl))); This statement is part of a loop that is iterating over the operands of a node, and it is pushing the operands" LLVM,NVPTX,990,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `SDValue E0 = DAG . getNode ( , dl , EltVT , Vector , DAG . getIntPtrConstant ( , dl ) ) ;` This statement creates a new `SDValue` object `E0` by calling the `getNode` method of the `DAG` object with the following arguments: * ``: The name of the instruction to be executed. * `dl`: The debug location of the" LLVM,NVPTX,991,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet without knowing the values of the variables and the context in which the code is being executed. However, based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the next statement will be the start of a new iteration of the loop, with the variable `parti` being incremented by 1." LLVM,NVPTX,992,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return SDValue ( ) ;` This is the final statement of the function, and it returns an empty `SDValue` object." LLVM,NVPTX,993,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `assert(LD->getExtensionType() == );` This statement is an assertion that the extension type of the `LoadSDNode` object `LD` is equal to ``. If this assertion fails, it means that the `LoadSDNode` object is not of the expected type, and the code will not function correctly." LLVM,NVPTX,994,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific inputs and the implementation of the `Lower` function. However, based on the pattern of the code, it is likely that the next statement will be a `case` statement for another string literal, such as `case : return Lower ( Op , DAG ) ;`, where `` is a vector operation such as `EXTRACT_VECTOR_ELT`, `CONCAT_VECTORS`, `STORE`, `LOAD" LLVM,NVPTX,995,"This code snippet is part of a function that is generating PTX (Parallel Thread Execution) code for the NVIDIA GPU. The function is using the LLVM API to create and manipulate instructions. The code is checking if the return type of the function is a vector type, and if so, it is generating code to store the vector elements to memory. The `VectorizePTXValueVTs` function is being used to determine the type of each vector element, and the `ComputePTXValueVTs` function is being used to compute the vector types. The `Store" LLVM,NVPTX,996,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `if (VT.isVector()) return LowerSTOREVector(Op, DAG);` This is because the first two `if` statements are checking for specific conditions, and if they are not met, the code will continue to the next `if` statement. The third `if` statement checks if `VT` is a vector, and if it is, it calls the `LowerSTOREVector` function with the `Op` and `DAG` arguments. If `VT` is not a vector, the code will return" LLVM,NVPTX,997,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `getBasePtr` and `getValue` methods, as well as the value of the `Tmp3` variable. However, based on the code snippet provided, it is likely that the next statement will be a call to the `getValueType` method on the `Tmp3` variable, which is an `SDValue` object. The `getValueType` method returns the type of the value stored in the `SDValue` object, which is likely to be a string in" LLVM,NVPTX,998,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `Opcode = ;` This is because the `switch` statement is checking the value of `NumElts`, which is the number of elements in the vector, and setting `Opcode` to a specific value based on that value. The `default` case is `return SDValue ( )`, which means that if `NumElts` is not equal to any of the other cases, the function will return an empty `SDValue`. The `case` statements are checking the value of `NumElts` against" LLVM,NVPTX,999,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be: `Ops.push_back(N->getOperand());` This is because the code is currently iterating over the operands of the node `N`, and the next operand to be processed is the one with index ``. The `Ops` vector is being used to store the operands of the node, and the `push_back` method is being used to add the operand to the end of the vector." LLVM,NVPTX,1000,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the `getOperand()` method is not specified. However, based on the name of the method and the fact that it is being called on a variable named `N`, it is likely that the method returns the operand of a mathematical expression represented by the variable `N`. Therefore, the next statement of this code snippet could potentially be any statement that uses the value returned by the `getOperand()` method, such as assigning it to a variable, printing it to the console, or using it in a" LLVM,NVPTX,1001,"The next statement after the `if` statement in the code snippet you provided is the `return` statement. The `if` statement checks whether the `PerformADDCombineWithOperands` function returns a non-null value. If it does, the `return` statement returns that value. If the `PerformADDCombineWithOperands` function returns a null value, the `if` statement will not be executed, and the `return` statement will not be reached. Therefore, the next statement after the `if` statement is the `return` statement." LLVM,NVPTX,1002,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `if (Val->getOpcode() == || Val->getOpcode() == ) {` This is because the code is checking the opcode of the `Val` node, and if it is equal to `` or ``, it will execute the code inside the `if` statement." LLVM,NVPTX,1003,"Based on the code snippet, it appears that the next statement will be: `AddTo = true;` The `AddTo` variable is set to `false` initially, but then it is set to `true` if the `ExtType` variable is not equal to ``. Since the `ExtType` variable is set to `` in the previous line, the `AddTo` variable will be set to `true`." LLVM,NVPTX,1004,"Based on the code snippet you provided, it appears to be a switch statement that is checking the value of a string literal. The next statement that will be executed is the one that matches the value of the string literal. Without knowing the specific value of the string literal, it is not possible to predict which case statement will be executed. However, based on the code snippet you provided, it appears that the possible values for the string literal are: * * * * *" LLVM,NVPTX,1005,"The next statement after the `if` statement in the code snippet you provided is the `return` statement. The `if` statement checks whether the `TryMULWIDECombine` function returns a non-null value. If it does, the `if` statement returns the value returned by `TryMULWIDECombine`. If the `if` statement is not true, the `return` statement is executed, which returns the value of the `SDValue` variable `Ret`." LLVM,NVPTX,1006,"Based on the code snippet you provided, it appears to be a part of a function that is trying to perform a division operation on two operands. The function is checking if the operands are of a certain type and if the division operation is valid. If the operands are valid, the function will return a node with the result of the division operation. The next statement of the code snippet you provided is: `const SDValue & Num = N -> getOperand ( ) ;` This line is getting the first operand of the division operation, which is assumed" LLVM,NVPTX,1007,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty because the behavior of the code depends on the specific values of the variables and the implementation of the functions called. However, based on the information provided, it appears that the code is attempting to perform a division operation, and the next statement is likely to be a call to a function that performs the division. The code is using the `IsSigned` variable to determine whether the division should be performed as a signed or unsigned division. The `DivOpc` variable is being set to a string literal based on the value of `IsSign" LLVM,NVPTX,1008,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `getOperand` and `getValueType` methods, as well as the values of the variables `N`, `CCType`, and `A`. However, based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the next statement will be a call to the `SDValue` constructor, passing in the result of the `getOperand` method and the `SDLoc` object constructed from `N`." LLVM,NVPTX,1009,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `if ( SDValue Ret = TryMULWIDECombine ( N , DCI ) ) return Ret ;` This statement checks if the `TryMULWIDECombine` function can be applied to the current node `N` and the `DCI` object, and if it can, it returns the result of the function. If the function cannot be applied, the statement returns an empty `SDValue`." LLVM,NVPTX,1010,"The next statement of the code snippet is: `SDValue NewLD = DAG.getMemIntrinsicNode(Opcode, DL, LdResVTs, OtherOps, MemSD->getMemoryVT(), MemSD->getMemOperand());` This statement creates a new memory intrinsic node `NewLD` using the `getMemIntrinsicNode` method of the `DAG` object. The method takes several arguments, including the opcode of the memory intrinsic, the data layout, the vector type of the result, the operands of the" LLVM,NVPTX,1011,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `OtherOps.push_back(DAG.getIntPtrConstant(LD->getExtensionType(), DL));` This statement adds a new element to the `OtherOps` vector, which is a `SmallVector` of `SDValue`s. The element being added is a constant integer value that represents the extension type of the memory load operation. The `getIntPtrConstant` method is used to create this constant value. The `DL` parameter is used to specify the data layout of the target architecture." LLVM,NVPTX,1012,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return getDataSection();` This statement returns the data section of the target object file, which is the section that contains the global object. The `getDataSection()` method is called on the `TargetObjectFile` object, which is a subclass of `MCSection`. The `getDataSection()` method returns a pointer to the data section, which is then returned by the `SelectSectionForGlobal()` method." LLVM,NVPTX,1013,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return F->getFnAttribute()->getValueAsString() == ;` This statement is executed if the `if` condition is true, which means that the function `F` has the attribute `hasFnAttribute` with the value ``. The statement returns the value of the attribute `getValueAsString` as a string, which is then compared to the value `` using the `==` operator. If the values are equal, the function returns `true" LLVM,NVPTX,1014,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return F->getFnAttribute()->getValueAsString() == ;` This statement is inside the `else` block, which means that it will only be executed if the `if` condition is not met. The statement returns the value of the `getValueAsString()` method of the `FnAttribute` object, which is a string representation of the function's attribute. The `== ` comparison operator is used to check if the returned string is equal to the string literal `<" LLVM,NVPTX,1015,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return UsePrecSqrtF32;` This is because the `if` statement checks whether the `UsePrecSqrtF32` flag is set, and if it is, it returns `UsePrecSqrtF32`. If the flag is not set, the `else` block is executed, which returns the negation of the `getTargetMachine().Options.UnsafeFPMath` value." LLVM,NVPTX,1016,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return UsePrecSqrtF32;` This is because the `if` statement checks whether the number of occurrences of `UsePrecSqrtF32` is greater than ``. If it is, then the `if` block is executed and `UsePrecSqrtF32` is returned. Otherwise, the `else` block is executed and `!getTargetMachine().Options.UnsafeFPMath` is returned." LLVM,NVPTX,1017,"Based on the code snippet you provided, it appears to be a loop that is iterating over a vector of values and performing some checks and assignments. It is difficult to predict the next statement with certainty without knowing the specific values being used in the loop and the expected behavior of the code. However, based on the code snippet, it appears that the next statement will be the start of a new loop iteration, with the variable `I` being incremented by 1." LLVM,NVPTX,1018,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `delete` operator and the types of the objects being deleted. However, based on the code snippet provided, it is likely that the next statement will be a call to the `delete` operator to delete the `DwarfRangesSection` object." LLVM,NVPTX,1019,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `if (Val.equals("""")) {`" LLVM,NVPTX,1020,"The next statement of the code snippet is: `ValueVTs.push_back(VT);` This is because the `for` loop is iterating over the elements of the `TempVTs` vector, and for each element, it is checking if it is a vector type. If it is not a vector type, it is simply pushing the element onto the `ValueVTs` vector. If it is a vector type, it is extracting the element type and number of elements, and then pushing the element type onto the `ValueVTs` vector the appropriate number of" LLVM,NVPTX,1021,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `ValueVTs.push_back(EVT());`" LLVM,NVPTX,1022,"Based on the code snippet you provided, the next statement is likely to be: `if (getAlign(*cast(CalleeI), Idx, Align)) return Align;` This is because the code is checking if the alignment of the `CallInst` instruction is equal to the `Align` value, and if it is, the function will return the `Align` value. If the alignment is not equal to the `Align` value, the code will continue to the next statement." LLVM,NVPTX,1023,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `if (isa < ConstantExpr > (CalleeV)) {` This is because the code checks if `CalleeV` is a `ConstantExpr` using the `isa` intrinsic, and if it is, it enters the `if` block." LLVM,NVPTX,1024,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of the code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `TargetLoweringBase` class and the `getPreferredVectorAction` method. However, based on the name of the method and the fact that it is a member of the `TargetLoweringBase` class, it is likely that the method returns an object of type `LegalizeTypeAction` that represents the preferred action to take when dealing with a vector of the specified type. The `MVT` parameter is likely a type that represents a machine vector type" LLVM,NVPTX,1025,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return TypeSplitVector;` The first `if` statement checks if the number of elements in the vector is not equal to `` and the scalar type is equal to ``. If this condition is true, the function returns `TypeSplitVector`. The second `if` statement checks if the vector type is equal to ``. If this condition is true, the function returns `TypeLegal`. If neither of these conditions is true, the function returns the result of calling `" LLVM,NVPTX,1026,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be: `return false;` The `isLegalAddressingMode` function is checking if the addressing mode is legal for the target architecture. If the base register is a global variable, it is not a legal addressing mode. The function is checking if the base offset, base register, and scale are all zero, and if the base register is a global variable, it will return false." LLVM,NVPTX,1027,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet without knowing the context and the purpose of the code. However, based on the code snippet provided, it appears to be a part of a loop that is iterating over a vector of values. The loop is checking if the current value is the first or last value in the vector, and if so, it is performing some operations on the value. The next statement of the code snippet is likely to be the continuation of the loop, where the code will check if there are any more values in the vector and continue iterating if necessary. It is also possible" LLVM,NVPTX,1028,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be: `if (VT == ) return LowerFROUND32(Op, DAG);` This is because the code is checking the value type of the `Op` SDValue, and if it is equal to ``, it will return the result of the `LowerFROUND32` function with the `Op` SDValue and the `DAG` object as arguments. If the value type is not equal to ``, the code will continue to the next" LLVM,NVPTX,1029,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific values of the variables and the behavior of the `DAG` object. However, based on the code provided, it appears that the next statement will be: `RoundedA = DAG.getNode(, SL, VT, IsLarge, A, RoundedA);` This statement is likely to be a call to the `getNode` method of the `DAG` object, which is used to create a new node in the data flow graph." LLVM,NVPTX,1030,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `SDValue Result = DAG.getNode(ISD::FP_ROUND, SL, VT, AbsA, DAG.getConstant(0, VT));` This statement creates a new SDValue node with the opcode `ISD::FP_ROUND`, which represents the `FROUND64` instruction in the target ISA. The node takes three operands: the first is the `AbsA` value, which is the absolute value of the input operand `A`; the second is a constant" LLVM,NVPTX,1031,"It's difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `DAG` class and the values of the variables `SL`, `VT`, `IsSmall`, `A`, and `RoundedA`. However, based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the next statement will be a call to the `getNode` method of the `DAG` class, passing in the string literal ``, the `SL` and `VT` variables, and either `RoundedA` or `A` as" LLVM,NVPTX,1032,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be a call to the `getPointerTy` function, passing in the data layout and the address space of the global variable `GAN`. The return value of this function is assigned to the variable `PtrVT`." LLVM,NVPTX,1033,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific input and the behavior of the `DAG` object. However, based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the next statement will be a call to the `getNode` method of the `DAG` object, passing in the `PtrVT` variable as the second argument and the result of the `getTargetGlobalAddress` method as the third argument. The `getNode` method is used to create a new node in the DAG, and the `PtrVT` variable is used to" LLVM,NVPTX,1034,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `LoadSDNode * Load = cast < LoadSDNode > ( Op ) ;` This statement is casting the `Op` value to a `LoadSDNode` pointer, which is a type of node in the SelectionDAG. The `cast` operator is used to perform the cast, and it is a part of the LLVM IR." LLVM,NVPTX,1035,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `if (Op.getValueType() == ) return LowerLOADi1(Op, DAG);` This statement checks if the value type of the `Op` operand is a string literal (``). If it is, the function `LowerLOADi1` is called with the `Op` operand and the `DAG` object as arguments, and the function returns the result of the call. If the value type of `Op` is not a string literal, the next statement is:" LLVM,NVPTX,1036,"Based on the code snippet you provided, it appears to be a switch statement in a programming language. The `` placeholders represent string literals that are being used as case labels in the switch statement. The code snippet is likely part of a function that takes a string literal as an argument and performs different actions based on the value of the string literal. The function returns an `SDValue` object in some cases, and in other cases it returns a value of a different type (such as an integer or a pointer). Without more context, it's difficult to predict exactly what" LLVM,NVPTX,1037,"The next statement of this code snippet is: case : Op = DAG.getNode(ISD::SCALAR_STORE, dl, RetTy, Chain, DAG.getConstant(Offsets[i], dl, RetTy), StoreOperands[i], MemOperand); break;" LLVM,NVPTX,1038,"The next statement is: `StoreOperands.push_back(DAG.getNode(ISD::STORE, dl, RetTy, Chain, DAG.getConstant(Offsets[i], dl, RetTy), StoreOperands));` This statement is adding a new node to the `StoreOperands` vector, which represents the operands for a store instruction. The node is created using the `DAG.getNode` method, which takes several arguments: * `ISD::STORE`: This is the opcode for the" LLVM,NVPTX,1039,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `if (VT.isVector()) return LowerSTOREVector(Op, DAG);` This is because the code checks the type of the memory operand (represented by `VT`) and calls the appropriate function to lower the store operation based on the type. If `VT` is a vector type, the function `LowerSTOREVector` is called to lower the store operation." LLVM,NVPTX,1040,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return F.getFnAttribute().getValueAsString() == ;` This statement is inside the `else` block, which means that it will only be executed if the `if` condition is not met. In this case, the `if` condition is `F.hasFnAttribute()`, which checks if the function `F` has a function attribute with the given name. If this condition is not met, then the code inside the `else` block will be" LLVM,NVPTX,1041,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return false;` Explanation: The code snippet is checking if the function `F` has a specific attribute with the value ``. If the function does not have this attribute, the code returns `false`. Otherwise, it returns the value of the attribute as a string." LLVM,NVPTX,1042,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `TargetObjectFile` class and the context in which it is being used. However, based on the syntax and the fact that the `TargetObjectFile` class is being destructed, it is likely that the next statement will be the start of the destructor implementation for the `TargetObjectFile` class." LLVM,NVPTX,1043,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `TargetObjectFile` class and the context in which it is being used. However, based on the syntax and the fact that the `TargetObjectFile` class is being destructed, it is likely that the next statement will be the start of the destructor implementation for the `TargetObjectFile` class." LLVM,NVPTX,1044,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `TargetLowering` class and the `MachineFunction` and `CodeGenOpt` classes. However, based on the names of the classes and methods involved, it appears that the code is checking whether the target architecture supports the use of the Fused Multiply-Add (FMA) instruction. The `TargetLowering` class is likely a class that provides a set of methods for generating code for a specific target architecture, and the `allowFMA` method is likely one of" LLVM,NVPTX,1045,"Based on the code snippet, it appears that the next statement will be: `return FMAContractLevelOpt > ;` This is because the `if` statement checks if the number of occurrences of `FMAContractLevelOpt` is greater than ``, and if it is, it returns `FMAContractLevelOpt > `. If the number of occurrences is not greater than ``, the code will execute the `else if` statement, which checks if `OptLevel` is equal to `<" LLVM,NVPTX,1046,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `anchor` method in the `Section` class. However, based on the name of the method and the fact that it is a member of the `Section` class, it is likely that the next statement will be related to the anchor or reference point of the section." LLVM,NVPTX,1047,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `anchor` method in the `Section` class. However, based on the name of the method and the fact that it is a member of the `Section` class, it is likely that the next statement will be related to the anchor or reference point of the section." LLVM,NVPTX,1048,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `IsSigned = (LHSSign == Signed);` This statement assigns the value `true` to `IsSigned` if `LHSSign` is equal to `Signed`, and `false` otherwise." LLVM,NVPTX,1049,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `ValueVTs.push_back(VT);` This is because the `for` loop is iterating over the elements of `TempVTs`, and for each element `VT`, the code is checking if `VT` is a vector type. If it is, the code is pushing the vector element type onto `ValueVTs` and updating the offset. If it is not, the code is simply pushing `VT` onto `ValueVTs`. Therefore, the next statement after the `for` loop is `" LLVM,NVPTX,1050,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `CalleeV = cast < ConstantExpr > ( CalleeV ) -> getOperand ( ) ;` This statement is inside a while loop that is checking if the `CalleeV` value is a constant expression and if it is a cast operation. If it is a cast operation, the code will get the operand of the constant expression at index ``. The value of `` is not specified in the code snippet, so it is not possible to determine the exact" LLVM,NVPTX,1051,"The next statement of this code snippet is: return ConstraintType::Integer; Explanation: The code snippet is a method named `getConstraintType` that takes a `StringRef` parameter named `Constraint`. The method checks the size of the `Constraint` string and if it is equal to a specific value (represented by `` in the code snippet), it performs a switch statement on the first character of the `Constraint` string. If the first character is 'b', 'r', 'h', or 'c', the method returns `ConstraintType" LLVM,NVPTX,1052,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be the creation of a new symbol for the parameter, using the `ParamSym` string and the `ParamStr` raw string stream. The code is likely to look something like this: ``` ParamSym = ParamStr.str(); ``` This statement will create a new symbol for the parameter, using the string created by the `ParamStr` raw string stream. The symbol will be named after the machine function name and the parameter index, separated by a space. It's worth noting that the `ParamSym` string is not used anywhere in" LLVM,NVPTX,1053,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `DAG` class and the `getMachineFunction` method. However, based on the code provided, it appears that the next statement will be a call to the `getManagedString` method of the `ManagedStrPool` class, passing in the `ParamSym` string as an argument. The `getManagedString` method is likely to return a pointer to a managed string, which is then assigned to the `SavedStr` variable. The `ManagedStrPool` class is" LLVM,NVPTX,1054,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return TypeSplitVector;` This is because the `if` statement checks whether the number of elements in the vector is not equal to `` and the scalar type is equal to ``. If this condition is true, the function returns `TypeSplitVector`. Otherwise, it returns the result of `TargetLoweringBase::getPreferredVectorAction(VT)`." LLVM,NVPTX,1055,"The next statement after the `if` statement in the code snippet you provided is: ``` return TypeSplitVector; ``` This statement is executed if the condition in the `if` statement is true, which means that the vector has a different number of elements than the specified `` and the scalar type is the same as the specified ``. In this case, the function returns the `TypeSplitVector` value." LLVM,NVPTX,1056,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `O << << sz << ;` This statement is part of the `if` block that checks if `Ty` is an integer type. It is printing the size of the type `Ty` to the output stream `O`." LLVM,NVPTX,1057,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet without knowing the specific values of the variables and the context in which the code is being executed. However, based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the function is returning a pair of values, where the first value is a number literal and the second value is a string literal. The function is also using a switch statement to determine which values to return based on the value of a character variable. Without more information, it is not possible to predict the exact values that will be returned by the function. However, based on the code snippet provided, it is" LLVM,NVPTX,1058,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return std::find(std::begin(specialTypes), std::end(specialTypes), TypeName) != std::end(specialTypes);` This statement is a call to the `std::find` algorithm, which searches for the first occurrence of `TypeName` in the range `[std::begin(specialTypes), std::end(specialTypes))`. If `TypeName` is found, the function returns an iterator pointing to the first occurrence. Otherwise, it returns `std::end(specialTypes)`. The purpose of this statement is" LLVM,NVPTX,1059,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `if (TypeName == ) return false;`" LLVM,NVPTX,1060,"Based on the code snippet provided, it is difficult to predict the next statement with certainty. However, we can make an educated guess based on the information provided. The `isLegalAddressingMode` function appears to be checking whether a given addressing mode is legal for a particular target architecture. The function takes several parameters, including a `DataLayout` object, an `AddrMode` object, a `Type` pointer, and an unsigned integer representing the address space. The function first checks if the `BaseGV` field of the `AddrMode` object is non-null. If" LLVM,NVPTX,1061,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty because it depends on the specific values of the variables and the behavior of the `Op` object. However, based on the code snippet, it appears that the next statement will be: `S = Signed;` This is because the `if` statement checks if the size of the operand is less than or equal to `OptSize`, and if it is, it sets `S` to `Signed` and returns `true`. If the size of the operand is greater than `OptSize`, the `else if" LLVM,NVPTX,1062,"Based on the code snippet you provided, it appears that the `IsPTXVectorType` function is checking whether a given machine type (represented by the `MVT` object) is a PTX vector type. The function is checking the `SimpleTy` field of the `MVT` object to determine this. The `switch` statement is checking the value of `SimpleTy` against a series of string literals. If the value of `SimpleTy` matches any of these literals, the function returns `true`. Otherwise, it returns `false`. Based on this" LLVM,NVPTX,1063,"The next statement after the `if` block will be the `else` block, which will execute if the condition in the `if` block is not met. In this case, the `else` block will call the `TargetLowering::LowerAsmOperandForConstraint` method with the `Op`, `Constraint`, `Ops`, and `DAG` parameters." LLVM,NVPTX,1064,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `Constraint.length( ) > ` This is a comparison expression that checks if the length of the `Constraint` object is greater than the value of ``. If the condition is true, the `return` statement will be executed and the function will return without executing any further statements." LLVM,NVPTX,1065,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return DAG.getNode(, dl, Node->getValueType(), Ops);` This statement returns a node from the DAG (Directed Acyclic Graph) with the given string literal, data layout, and value type. The value type is obtained from the `Node` object using the `getValueType` method, and the `Ops` vector is passed as an argument to the `getNode` method." LLVM,NVPTX,1066,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be: `Ops.push_back(LowerOperand(Op.getOperand(i), DAG));` This is because the code is iterating over the operands of the `CONCAT_VECTORS` node, and for each operand, it is calling the `LowerOperand` function to lower it. The `LowerOperand` function is likely to return a lowered version of the operand, which is then added to the `Ops` vector." LLVM,NVPTX,1067,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet without knowing the context and the purpose of the code. However, based on the syntax and the variables used, it appears that the code is working with a global variable `GV` that is being cast to a `GlobalAddressSDNode` type. The `getGlobal()` method is then being called on the `GV` variable to retrieve the global variable. Without more information, it is not possible to determine the exact purpose of the code or what the next statement will be. If you have more information about the code or the context in which it is being" LLVM,NVPTX,1068,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return LowerLOADi1(Op, DAG);` This is because the `if` statement checks if the value type of `Op` is equal to ``, and if it is, it returns the result of calling `LowerLOADi1` with `Op` and `DAG` as arguments. If the value type of `Op` is not equal to ``, the `if` statement will not be executed, and the next statement will be executed, which is the `return` statement." LLVM,NVPTX,1069,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be the return statement, which returns the result of the `getLoad` method called on the `DAG` object. The `getLoad` method is used to create a new load instruction with the specified parameters, and the result of this method is assigned to the `newLD` variable. The code snippet is part of a method called `LowerLOADi1`, which is used to lower a load instruction of a specific type (in this case, a load instruction that loads a single 1-bit value). The method takes two parameters: `Op`, which" LLVM,NVPTX,1070,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `DAG` class and the values of the variables `LD`, `dl`, and `STR_LIT`. However, based on the code provided, it appears that the next statement will be a call to the `getNode` method of the `DAG` class, passing in the `result` variable and the `LD->getChain()` method as arguments. The `getNode` method is used to create a new node in the DAG, and it takes a string literal" LLVM,NVPTX,1071,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `DAG` class and the values of the variables `Op`, `DL`, `Op0`, `Op1`, and `Op2`. However, based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the next statement will likely be a call to the `getNode` method of the `DAG` class, passing in the values of `Op0`, `Op1`, and `Op2` as arguments." LLVM,NVPTX,1072,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific values of the placeholders and the behavior of the `getNode` and `getOperand` methods. However, based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the next statement will be a call to the `getNode` method of the `DAG` object, passing in the `Op0`, `Op1`, and `Op2` values as arguments. The `getNode` method will likely return a new `SDValue` object representing the result of the operation." LLVM,NVPTX,1073,"Based on the code snippet provided, it appears to be a part of a function that performs a shift operation on a value. The function takes in a value, a shift amount, and a boolean value indicating whether the shift should be logical (true) or arithmetic (false). The code snippet you provided is the else block of the function, which means that the shift amount is greater than or equal to the number of bits in the value. In this case, the function is performing a reverse shift, which means that the shift amount is subtracted from the number of bits in the value, rather than added to it." LLVM,NVPTX,1074,"The next statement of this code snippet is: SDValue RevShAmt = DAG . getNode ( , dl , , DAG . getConstant ( VTBits , dl , ) , ShAmt ) ; This statement is creating a new SDValue called RevShAmt, which is a node in the DAG. The node is created using the getNode() method of the DAG, and it has several parameters: * The first parameter is a string literal that represents the" LLVM,NVPTX,1075,"The next statement of this code snippet is: SDValue Result = DAG.getNode(, dl, VT, Ops); This statement creates a new SDValue node with the given opcode, data layout, and value type, and with the operands specified in the Ops array." LLVM,NVPTX,1076,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of the code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `LowerSTOREVector` function and the values of the `Op` and `DAG` parameters. However, based on the context of the code snippet, it is likely that the next statement will be a call to the `LowerSTOREVector` function with the `Op` and `DAG` parameters as arguments." LLVM,NVPTX,1077,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of the code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `LowerSTOREVector` function and the values of the `Op` and `DAG` parameters. However, based on the context of the code snippet, it is likely that the next statement will be a call to the `LowerSTOREVector` function with the `Op` and `DAG` parameters as arguments." LLVM,NVPTX,1078,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `ST` and `DAG` classes, as well as the values of the variables `isNonTemporal`, `dl`, and `Tmp3`. However, based on the names of the variables and the methods being called, it is likely that the next statement will be related to the creation or manipulation of a node in a directed acyclic graph (DAG). Some possible next statements could include: * `Tmp3 = DAG.getNode(" LLVM,NVPTX,1079,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific values of the variables and the behavior of the functions being called. However, based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the next statement will be: `Ops.push_back(ExtVal);` This is because the `for` loop is currently iterating over the range of values from `0` to `NumElts-1`, and the next iteration will occur when `i` is equal to `NumElts-1`. At this point, the `ExtVal` variable" LLVM,NVPTX,1080,"The next statement of this code snippet is: Opcode = ;" LLVM,NVPTX,1081,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be: `return Result;` This is because the `PerformADDCombine` function is expected to return a value, and the `Result` variable is the last statement in the function that is not a return statement. Therefore, it is likely that the next statement will be a return statement that returns the `Result` variable." LLVM,NVPTX,1082,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific values of the variables and the implementation of the `PerformADDCombineWithOperands` function. However, based on the code snippet provided, it is likely that the next statement will be a return statement, as the `if` statement checks if the `Result` variable is non-null and returns it if it is. If the `Result` variable is null, then the function will continue executing and potentially return a different value." LLVM,NVPTX,1083,"Based on the code snippet provided, it is difficult to predict the next statement with certainty. However, based on the context and the structure of the code, it is likely that the next statement will be a continuation of the `if` statement that is currently being evaluated. The code is checking the number of uses of a node `N0` and the number of non-add uses of the node. If the number of uses is greater than or equal to a certain threshold, or if the number of non-add uses is non-zero, the function returns an empty `SDValue`. Otherwise, it continues" LLVM,NVPTX,1084,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be a call to the `getOperand` method of the `Val` object, as it is the next method call in the code snippet. The `getOperand` method is used to retrieve the operand of a value, and it is likely that the code is trying to retrieve the operand of the `Val` object." LLVM,NVPTX,1085,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `if (MemVT == ) {`" LLVM,NVPTX,1086,"Based on the code snippet you provided, it appears that the `PerformADDCombine` function is being called with the arguments `N`, `DCI`, `STI`, and `OptLevel`. The `case` statements are checking the value of `N` and performing different operations based on its value. If `N` is equal to ``, then the `PerformMULCombine` function is called with the arguments `N`, `DCI`, and `OptLevel`. If `N` is equal to ``, then the `Perform" LLVM,NVPTX,1087,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific input and the implementation of the `PerformMULCombine`, `PerformSHLCombine`, `PerformANDCombine`, and `PerformSELECTCombine` functions. However, based on the structure of the code, it is likely that the next statement after the `switch` statement will be the `return` statement at the end of the function, which returns an `SDValue`." LLVM,NVPTX,1088,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `SDValue Ret = TryMULWIDECombine(N, DCI);`" LLVM,NVPTX,1089,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `IntrinsicId = IsMax ? : ;` This is a ternary operator that assigns a value to `IntrinsicId` based on the value of `IsMax`. If `IsMax` is true, `IntrinsicId` is assigned the value of ``, otherwise it is assigned the value of ``." LLVM,NVPTX,1090,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of the code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `Ret` object and the `getNode()` method. However, based on the code snippet provided, it is likely that the next statement will be: `return Ret.getNode();` This is because the `if` statement checks whether the `Ret` object is not null, and if it is not null, it returns the result of the `getNode()` method." LLVM,NVPTX,1091,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of the code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `Ret` object and the `getNode()` method. However, based on the code snippet provided, it is likely that the next statement will be: `return Ret.getNode();` This is because the `if` statement checks whether the `Ret` object is not null, and if it is not null, it returns the result of the `getNode()` method." LLVM,NVPTX,1092,"Based on the code snippet you provided, it appears to be part of a function that is handling a specific type of instruction in a compiler. The function is checking the type of the instruction and determining the appropriate opcode to use based on the number of elements in the instruction. The next statement in the code snippet is: `OtherOps . push_back ( Chain ) ;` This line is adding the `Chain` value to the `OtherOps` vector. The `OtherOps` vector is a vector of `SDValue` objects, and the `push_back`" LLVM,NVPTX,1093,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `SDValue NewLD = DAG . getMemIntrinsicNode ( Opcode , DL , LdResVTs , OtherOps , LD -> getMemoryVT ( ) , LD -> getMemOperand ( ) ) ;` This line of code creates a new memory intrinsic node using the `Opcode`, `DL`, `LdResVTs`, `OtherOps`, `LD -> getMemoryVT()`, and `LD -> getMemOperand()` parameters. The `Opcode` is a" LLVM,NVPTX,1094,The next statement after the `default` label is the `report_fatal_error` function call. LLVM,NVPTX,1095,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `SelectSectionForGlobal` method and the input parameters. However, based on the name of the method and the parameters, it is likely that the next statement will be related to selecting a section for the global value `GV`. Here are a few possibilities for what the next statement could be: 1. A check to see if the global value `GV` has already been assigned to a section. If it has, the method may return the existing section. 2. A check to" LLVM,NVPTX,1096,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `if ( MulType == ) { DemotedVT = ; } else { DemotedVT = ; }` This is a conditional statement that checks if the `MulType` is equal to a specific string literal. If it is, the `DemotedVT` variable is set to another string literal. Otherwise, the `DemotedVT` variable is set to another string literal." LLVM,NVPTX,1097,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `DemotedVT = DCI.DAG.getVT(MulType.getSizeInBits());`" LLVM,NVPTX,1098,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `delete` operator and the types of the objects being deleted. However, based on the code snippet provided, it is likely that the next statement will be a call to the `delete` operator to delete the `DwarfRangesSection` object. The code snippet is deleting a number of objects that appear to be instances of classes derived from a common base class, and the `delete` operator is being used to release the memory associated with each object. The `static_cast` operator" LLVM,NVPTX,1099,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet without knowing the context and the implementation of the `MachineFunction` class. However, based on the name of the method and the parameters, it appears that the method is checking whether the Fused Multiply-Add (FMA) instruction is faster than separate Multiply and Add instructions for a given machine function and element type (EVT). The next statement of the code snippet could be a check for the availability of the FMA instruction for the given machine function and element type, or it could be a comparison of the performance of the FMA" LLVM,NVPTX,1100,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the code depends on the specific implementation of the `MachineFunction` class and the `EVT` parameter. However, based on the name of the function and the return value, it is likely that the next statement will be a comparison or a logical operation that determines whether the `isFMAFasterThanFMulAndFAdd` function should return `true` or `false`." LLVM,NVPTX,1101,"The next statement after the `if` statement in the code snippet you provided is: `return ( , VT . getVectorNumElements ( ) ) ;` This statement is executed if the condition `VT.isVector()` is true, which means that the `VT` object is a vector. The `return` statement returns a string that is the concatenation of the string literal `` and the number of elements in the vector, which is obtained by calling the `getVectorNumElements()` method on the `" LLVM,NVPTX,1102,"The next statement after the `if` statement in the code snippet you provided is: `return ( , VT . getVectorNumElements ( ) ) ;` This statement is executed if the condition `VT.isVector()` is true, which means that the `VT` object is a vector. The `return` statement returns a string that is the concatenation of the string literal `` and the number of elements in the vector, which is obtained by calling the `getVectorNumElements()` method on the `" LLVM,NVPTX,1103,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the `getShiftAmountTy` method is not specified. However, based on the name of the method and the parameters it takes, it appears to be a method that returns a shift amount for a given type. Given the context of the code snippet, it is likely that the `getShiftAmountTy` method is called with the `LHSTy` parameter, which is an `EVT` type, and returns a shift amount that is used to shift the `LHSTy` type." LLVM,NVPTX,1104,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `ValueVTs.push_back(EVT());` This statement adds a new element to the `ValueVTs` vector, which is a `SmallVector` of `EVT` objects. The element being added is an `EVT` object constructed from the string literal ``." LLVM,NVPTX,1105,"Based on the code snippet provided, it appears to be a part of a function that is generating a string representation of a function call. The code is using the LLVM API to access information about the function and its arguments, and is constructing a string that includes the function name, the types of the arguments, and other information about the function call. The next statement of the code snippet is likely to be a loop that iterates over the arguments of the function call, and generates a string representation of each argument. The loop will likely use the `Args` vector to access the arguments, and will use the `O" LLVM,NVPTX,1106,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be: O << << align << ; This is because the previous statement is an if-else statement, and the else branch is being executed. The else branch contains the statement O << << align << ;, which is the next statement to be executed." LLVM,NVPTX,1107,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `for (unsigned j = Idx + 1; j < Idx + NumElts; ++j) {`" LLVM,NVPTX,1108,"Based on the code snippet provided, it appears to be a part of a function that is generating LLVM IR code. The code is using the LLVM API to create and manipulate instructions and types. The next statement is likely to be a call to the `CreateLoad` function, which creates a new load instruction and returns a pointer to it. The function takes several arguments, including the type of the load, the pointer to the memory location being loaded from, and the alignment of the load. Here is the next statement: ``` LoadInst * Load = CreateLoad(Ty, Ptr, align" LLVM,NVPTX,1109,"The next statement of this code snippet is: O << ; Explanation: The code snippet ends with the line `O << ;`, which is the next statement to be executed. The `` placeholder is a string literal that is not yet known, but it will be replaced with a specific string value when the code is executed." LLVM,NVPTX,1110,"The next statement after the code snippet you provided is: `return MF.getDenormalMode(APFloat::IEEEsingle()) == DenormalMode::PreserveSign;` This statement is a return statement that returns a boolean value indicating whether the denormal mode of the `MF` object is set to `PreserveSign`. The `getDenormalMode` method is called on the `MF` object, passing in the `IEEEsingle` type as an argument. The result of this method call is then compared to the `PreserveSign` value using the `==` operator" LLVM,NVPTX,1111,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return FtzEnabled;`" LLVM,NVPTX,1112,"The next statement after the code snippet you provided is: `return MF . getDenormalMode ( APFloat :: IEEEsingle ( ) ) == DenormalMode :: PreserveSign ;` This statement is a return statement that returns a boolean value indicating whether the denormal mode of the `MF` object is set to `PreserveSign`. The `getDenormalMode` method is called on the `MF` object, and the result is compared to the `PreserveSign` value using the `==` operator. If the denormal mode is set to `PreserveSign`," LLVM,NVPTX,1113,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `getExtSymb` function and the data stored in the `DAG` object. However, based on the name of the function and the parameters passed to it, it is likely that the function is retrieving a symbol from the `DAG` object and returning it. Therefore, the next statement of this code snippet is likely to be the return statement, which returns the symbol retrieved by the `getExtSymb` function." LLVM,NVPTX,1114,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `O << ;` This statement is part of the `for` loop that iterates over the `Args` vector. It is likely that the `` placeholder will be replaced with a string literal that represents a type or a value. The `O` variable is likely an output stream, and the `<<` operator is used to write a value to the stream." LLVM,NVPTX,1115,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific values of the variables and the behavior of the `getRegForInlineAsmConstraint` function. However, based on the code snippet, it appears that the function is returning a pair of values, where the first value is a number and the second value is a string. The `getRegForInlineAsmConstraint` function is being called with the `Constraint` and `VT` variables as arguments. Without knowing the specific values of these variables, it is not possible to predict the exact" LLVM,NVPTX,1116,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return std::make_pair(, &);` This statement is the return statement of the `switch` block, and it returns a `std::pair` object containing the `NUM_LIT` and `STR_LIT` values. The `std::make_pair` function is used to create the `std::pair` object." LLVM,NVPTX,1117,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet without knowing the specific values of the literals used in the code. However, based on the syntax and structure of the code, it appears to be a `switch` statement with multiple `case` labels, each returning a different string literal. The `default` label is used to handle any cases that do not match any of the `case` labels. In this case, it returns a numerical literal. Without more information about the specific values of the literals used in the code, it is not possible to predict the exact behavior of the code" LLVM,NVPTX,1118,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `Info.opc = ;` This is because the code is currently executing the `case :` block, and the next statement in that block is the assignment of the `opc` field of the `Info` structure." LLVM,NVPTX,1119,"The code snippet is checking if a type is a special type by comparing its name to a list of special types. The `specialTypes` array contains a list of strings representing the names of the special types. The code uses a `for` loop to iterate over the `specialTypes` array and checks if the name of the type being checked is equal to any of the special types in the array. If a match is found, the function returns `true`, otherwise it returns `false`. Therefore, the next statement of this code snippet would be the first statement inside the `for` loop, which is `if" LLVM,NVPTX,1120,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `const std::string TypeName = STy ? STy->getName() : """";` This line of code assigns the name of the struct type to the variable `TypeName`, if the struct type is not null. If the struct type is null, the value of `TypeName` is set to the string literal """"." LLVM,NVPTX,1121,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `Constraint = Constraint.substr(0, );` This statement is assigning a new value to the `Constraint` variable, which is a substring of the original `Constraint` string starting from the first character and ending at the position specified by ``. The `substr` method is used to extract the substring from the original string." LLVM,NVPTX,1122,"The next statement after the `if` block will be the `else` block, which will execute if the condition in the `if` block is not met. In this case, the `else` block will call the `TargetLowering::LowerAsmOperandForConstraint` method with the `Op`, `Constraint`, `Ops`, and `DAG` parameters." LLVM,NVPTX,1123,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet without knowing the specific values of the variables and the behavior of the functions being called. However, based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the next statement will be a call to the `getNode` method of the `DAG` object, passing in the `dl` object, the `Node->getValueType()` value, a reference to the `Ops` vector, and the size of the `Ops` vector." LLVM,NVPTX,1124,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `j = 0;` Explanation: The code snippet is a loop that iterates over the elements of a vector. The loop variable `j` is initialized to the value of the constant ``, which is not defined in the code snippet you provided. The loop continues until `j` is greater than or equal to the number of elements in the vector, which is stored in the variable `NumSubElem`. Therefore, the next statement of this code snippet is `j = 0;`, which" LLVM,NVPTX,1125,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `SDValue arg = DAG . getNode ( , dl , tmpvt , getParamSymbol ( DAG , idx , tmpvt ) ) ;` This line of code is creating a new `SDValue` object called `arg` and initializing it with the result of a call to `DAG.getNode()`. The `getNode()` method is a member function of the `DAG` class, and it is used to create a new node in the DAG. The `SDValue` object returned by" LLVM,NVPTX,1126,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return DAG . getNode ( , dl , getPointerTy ( ) , Op ) ;` This statement is a return statement that returns a node with the specified type, debug location, and operand. The type is specified by the `` placeholder, which is a string literal that represents the type of the node. The debug location is specified by the `dl` variable, which is a `DebugLoc` object that contains information about the source location of the node. The operand is specified by" LLVM,NVPTX,1127,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty because the code is incomplete and the behavior of the `LowerOperation` function is not specified. However, based on the code provided, it appears that the function is intended to handle different types of operations and return a value based on the operation code. The `switch` statement checks the value of `Op.getOpcode()` and executes the corresponding code block for each case. The first three cases return a new `SDValue` object, while the fourth case returns the original `Op` object. The fifth case is a fall-through" LLVM,NVPTX,1128,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return LowerCONCAT_VECTORS ( Op , DAG ) ;` This is because the `switch` statement is checking the value of `Op`, and if it matches the case ``, it will execute the code inside the `case` block. In this case, the `case` block contains the statement `return LowerCONCAT_VECTORS ( Op , DAG ) ;`, which is the next statement that will be executed." LLVM,NVPTX,1129,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific values of the variables and the behavior of the functions being called. However, based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the next statement will be a call to the `getNode` method of the `DAG` object, passing in several arguments. The first argument to `getNode` will be a string literal, which is either `` or ``, depending on the value of the `isABI` variable. The second argument will be the `" LLVM,NVPTX,1130,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `LoadSDNode * Load = cast < LoadSDNode > ( Op ) ;` This line casts the `Op` object to a `LoadSDNode` object, which is a subclass of `SDNode`. The `Load` variable now holds a reference to the `LoadSDNode` object." LLVM,NVPTX,1131,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet without knowing the context and the specific implementation of the `expandUnalignedLoad` function. However, based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the next statement after the `return` statement is likely to be the end of the function. The `expandUnalignedLoad` function is called with two arguments: `Load` and `DAG`. The function returns a value, which is then assigned to the `Ops` array at the index specified by ``. The `std::tie` function is used to create a" LLVM,NVPTX,1132,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `if (VT == && !allowsMemoryAccess(DAG.getContext(), DAG.getDataLayout(), VT, *Store->getMemOperand())) return expandUnalignedStore(Store, DAG);`" LLVM,NVPTX,1133,The next statement after the `if` block is the `const Function & F = MF.getFunction();` statement. LLVM,NVPTX,1134,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of the code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `MF` object and the `getTarget` and `getFunction` methods. However, based on the code snippet provided, it is likely that the next statement will be a call to the `getFunction` method on the `MF` object, which will return a reference to the `Function` object. Therefore, the next statement of the code snippet is likely to be: ``` const Function & F = MF.getFunction(); ```" LLVM,NVPTX,1135,"The next statement of the code snippet is: `if (DirectCallee) {`" LLVM,NVPTX,1136,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it appears to be part of a larger function and the context is not provided. However, based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the next statement will be the continuation of the `for` loop, with the variable `i` being incremented and the loop condition being checked again. The code snippet appears to be iterating over a list of arguments, and for each argument, it is checking whether it is a by-value argument and if so, it is printing out some information about the argument. The code snippet also" LLVM,NVPTX,1137,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `O << << (retAlignment ? retAlignment->value() : ) << << DL.getTypeAllocSize(retTy) << ;` This statement is part of the `else if` block that checks if the return type is an aggregate type, a vector type, or an integer type. If any of these conditions are true, the code will output a string literal, the size of the return type in bits, and another string literal" LLVM,NVPTX,1138,"The next statement of this code snippet is: return false;" LLVM,NVPTX,1139,The next statement after `return true ;` would be the end of the function or method. LLVM,NVPTX,1140,"The next statement is: `if (PTy->getPointerElementType() != specialTypes[0] && PTy->getPointerElementType() != specialTypes[1] && PTy->getPointerElementType() != specialTypes[2]) return false;`" LLVM,NVPTX,1141,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be a check for the type of the pointer `PTy` and perform a specific action based on the type. The `dyn_cast` function is used to cast the `Type` object `Ty` to a `PointerType` object `PTy`. If the cast is successful, `PTy` will be a non-null pointer to a `PointerType` object. The next statement could be a check for the type of the pointer `PTy` using the `isa` function, which returns a boolean value indicating whether the pointer is" LLVM,NVPTX,1142,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty because the behavior of the `IsMulWideOperandDemotable` function depends on the specific values of the input parameters and the implementation of the function. However, based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the function is checking whether the operand of a multiplication operation can be demoted to a smaller size. If the operand is a constant or has a fixed size that is smaller than or equal to the optimization size, the function may return `true`. However, without more information about the specific implementation of the function," LLVM,NVPTX,1143,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be a case statement, where the value of `NumElts` is used to determine which branch of the case statement to execute. The possible values of `NumElts` are 1, 2, or 3, and each case branch corresponds to a different value of `NumElts`. The code inside each case branch will likely perform a different operation depending on the value of `NumElts`." LLVM,NVPTX,1144,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `StoreOperands.push_back(RetVal);` This line adds the `RetVal` value to the `StoreOperands` vector." LLVM,NVPTX,1145,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific values of the variables and the behavior of the functions called. However, based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the next statement will be: `if (opIsLive) { ... }` This is because the code checks the value of `opIsLive` and only executes the code inside the `if` statement if `opIsLive` is true. The value of `opIsLive` is set to true if either `left` or `right` is a constant node, or" LLVM,NVPTX,1146,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `if (opIsLive) {`" LLVM,NVPTX,1147,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `ScalarRes.push_back(E0); ScalarRes.push_back(E1);` This statement adds the elements `E0` and `E1` to the end of the `ScalarRes` vector." LLVM,NVPTX,1148,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `if (Val.isIntN(OptSize)) { return true; }` This statement checks if the value of the constant operand `RHS` can be represented as an `OptSize`-bit integer, where `OptSize` is a parameter passed to the function. If the value can be represented as an `OptSize`-bit integer, the function returns `true`." LLVM,NVPTX,1149,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be: `for (unsigned i = 0; i < TempVTs.size(); ++i) {` This is because the `for` loop is initialized with `i = 0`, and the loop condition is `i < TempVTs.size()`, which means that the loop will iterate over the elements of `TempVTs` starting from the first element (index 0) until the last element (index `TempVTs.size() - 1`)." LLVM,NVPTX,1150,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `DirectCallee = CalleeV;` Explanation: The code snippet is checking if the `CalleeV` variable is a `Function` object. If it is, then it assigns the value of `CalleeV` to the `DirectCallee` variable." LLVM,NVPTX,1151,The next statement after the `if (DirectCallee)` block is `return TD->getABITypeAlignment(Ty);`. LLVM,NVPTX,1152,"The next statement after the `switch` block will be the return statement: ``` return TargetLowering :: getConstraintType ( Constraint ) ; ``` This is because the `switch` block is only executed if the `Constraint` is not a valid constraint, and the `default` case is executed if the `Constraint` is not a valid constraint. Since the `default` case does not have a `break` statement, the execution will continue to the next statement after the `switch` block, which is the `return` statement." LLVM,NVPTX,1153,"Based on the code snippet you provided, it appears to be a switch statement that is returning a pair of values based on the value of a character. The first value in the pair is a number literal, and the second value is a string literal. The next statement in the code snippet would be: case 'l' : case 'N' : return std :: make_pair ( , & ) ; This statement would return a pair of values where the first value is a number literal and the second value is a string literal. The number literal" LLVM,NVPTX,1154,"The next statement of this code snippet is: return LHSTy.getScalarShiftAmountTy();" LLVM,NVPTX,1155,"The next statement after the `if` block is the `return` statement. The `return` statement will return the result of the `EVT::getVectorVT` function, which is called with the `Ctx`, ``, and the number of elements in the vector `VT`." LLVM,NVPTX,1156,"The next statement after the `if` block is the `return` statement. The `return` statement will return the result of the `EVT::getVectorVT` function, which is called with the `Ctx`, ``, and the number of elements in the vector `VT`." LLVM,NVPTX,1157,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `if (STy && STy->isOpaque()) return false;` Explanation: The code checks if the type of the argument is a pointer to a structure type, and if so, it checks if the structure type is opaque. If the structure type is opaque, the function returns false." LLVM,NVPTX,1158,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `const std::string TypeName = STy && !STy->isLiteral() ? STy->getName() : """";` This statement declares a constant string variable called `TypeName` and initializes it with the result of the ternary operator. The ternary operator checks if `STy` is not null and if it is not a literal type, and if so, it returns the name of the type. If `STy` is null or a literal type, it returns the string literal "", dl, VT, ShOpLo, ShAmt); This is because the code is currently executing the `if` statement, and the next statement after the `if` statement is the `SDValue Lo = DAG.getNode(, dl, VT, ShOpLo, ShAmt);` statement." LLVM,NVPTX,1166,"Based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the next statement will be: SDValue TrueVal = DAG.getNode(, dl, VT, Tmp1, Tmp2); This is because the code is checking if the value of VTBits is equal to a specific value () and if the NVPTX subtarget's SM version is greater than or equal to another specific value (). If these conditions are met, then the code will execute the first branch of the if statement," LLVM,NVPTX,1167,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `SDValue RevShAmt = DAG . getNode ( , dl , , DAG . getConstant ( VTBits , ) , ShAmt ) ;` This statement creates a new SDValue called `RevShAmt` by calling the `getNode` method of the `DAG` object with the following arguments: * The first argument is a string literal representing the operation to be performed. * The second argument is" LLVM,NVPTX,1168,"Based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the next statement will be: `SDValue Lo = DAG . getNode ( , dl , VT , ShOpLo , ShAmt ) ;` This line of code is creating a new `SDValue` called `Lo` by calling the `getNode` method on the `DAG` object, passing in the `dl` object, the `VT` object, `ShOpLo`, `ShAmt`, and a string literal as arguments. The `getNode` method is used to" LLVM,NVPTX,1169,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `Ops.push_back(N->getOperand(i));` This line adds the operand at index `i` of the node `N` to the `Ops` vector. The `Ops` vector is used to store the operands of the instruction being generated, and this line adds the next operand to the vector." LLVM,NVPTX,1170,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `SDValue LoadChain = NewLD . getValue ( NumElts ) ;` This line retrieves the value of the `NumElts` element of the `NewLD` vector, which is the load chain for the memory intrinsic." LLVM,NVPTX,1171,"The next statement of this code snippet is: ScalarRes.push_back(Res);" LLVM,NVPTX,1172,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `if (ShlRHS->getAPIntValue() == 0) {`" LLVM,NVPTX,1173,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `DemotedVT = ;` This statement assigns the value of `` to the variable `DemotedVT`." LLVM,NVPTX,1174,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the code and the data structures being used. However, based on the names of the sections being deleted, it appears that the code is deleting various sections related to exception handling and debugging information. The next statement in the code snippet is likely to be a call to the `delete` operator to delete another section related to exception handling or debugging information. The exact name of the section being deleted will depend on the specific implementation of the code and the data structures being used." LLVM,NVPTX,1175,"The next statement after the given code snippet would be: delete DwarfRangesSection;" LLVM,NVPTX,1176,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `O << << sz << ;` This statement is a call to the `operator<<` function on the `O` object, which is a stream object. The `<<` operator is used to insert the string literal `` into the stream, followed by the value of `sz`, which is the size of the type `Ty` in bits, and then another string literal ``. The purpose of this statement is to output the size of the type `Ty" LLVM,NVPTX,1177,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be: `O << << sz << ;` This is because the previous statement is `unsigned sz = ;` and the next statement is `O << << sz << ;` which is a concatenation of three strings. The first string is ``, the second string is `sz`, and the third string is ``." LLVM,NVPTX,1178,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific values of the variables and the behavior of the functions being called. However, based on the syntax and the context of the code, it appears that the next statement will be a call to the `PerformREMCombine` function, passing in the values of `N`, `DCI`, and `OptLevel` as arguments." LLVM,NVPTX,1179,"Based on the pattern of the code snippet, it appears that the next statement will be: case : return PerformORCombine ( N , DCI ) ; This is because the previous cases all follow the same pattern of returning a function call with the same arguments, except for the function name, which is different for each case. The next function name that is likely to be called is ""PerformORCombine"", based on the pattern of the previous cases." LLVM,NVPTX,1180,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be: `NeedTrunc = true;` The code is checking if the element type of the vector has a size less than a certain value (represented by ``), and if so, it sets the `NeedTrunc` flag to `true`." LLVM,NVPTX,1181,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be a loop that processes the elements of the vector, as indicated by the use of the `i` variable and the `NumElts` variable. The loop will likely use the `SDValue` objects in the `OtherOps` vector to perform some operation on each element of the vector. It's difficult to provide a more specific answer without more context about the code snippet and the surrounding code. Can you provide more information or clarify your question?" LLVM,NVPTX,1182,The next statement after `return AtomicExpansionKind :: None ;` would be the end of the function or method. LLVM,NVPTX,1183,The next statement after `return AtomicExpansionKind :: None ;` would be the end of the function or method. LLVM,NVPTX,1184,The next statement after `return AtomicExpansionKind :: None ;` would be the end of the function or method. LLVM,NVPTX,1185,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `ValueVTs.push_back(VT.getVectorElementType());` This statement adds the vector element type to the `ValueVTs` vector." LLVM,NVPTX,1186,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `ValueVTs.push_back(VT.getVectorElementType());`" LLVM,NVPTX,1187,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific values of the variables and the behavior of the functions being called. However, based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the next statement will be: `if ( !llvm::getAlign(*(CS->getCalledFunction()), Idx, align) ) align = TD->getABITypeAlignment(Ty);` This statement is checking if the alignment of the called function is not equal to the alignment of the type `Ty`. If the alignment is not equal, then the" LLVM,NVPTX,1188,"Based on the code snippet provided, it is difficult to predict the next statement with certainty. However, based on the context and the patterns present in the code, it is likely that the next statement will be another `O << << << ;` statement, where `` is a variable that is defined in the surrounding code. The code snippet appears to be generating a string representation of a type, with the intention of printing it to the output stream `O`. The code is checking the type of the return value `ret" LLVM,NVPTX,1189,"Based on the code snippet provided, it is difficult to predict the next statement with certainty. However, based on the context of the code, it appears that the next statement is likely to be a continuation of the `if` statement that checks if the type of the argument is a pointer type. In this case, the code is checking if the type of the argument is a pointer type using the `dyn_cast` function, and if it is, it is casting the type to a `PointerType` object. The next statement is likely to be a check on the size of the pointer type, possibly" LLVM,NVPTX,1190,"Based on the code snippet you provided, it seems that the next statement will be: case 'd' : return std :: make_pair ( , & ) ; This is because the code is using a switch statement to handle different cases, and the next case after 'c', 'h', and 'r' is 'd'. The statement inside each case is returning a pair of values, where the first value is a numeric literal and the second value is a string literal." LLVM,NVPTX,1191,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it appears to be a fragment of a larger program. However, based on the syntax and structure of the code, it is likely that the next statement will be a `return` statement, possibly with a string literal as the return value." LLVM,NVPTX,1192,"Based on the code snippet you provided, it appears that the `getTgtMemIntrinsic` function is part of a larger program that is responsible for generating code for a target machine. The function takes in an `IntrinsicInfo` object and a `CallInst` object as input, and it uses a `switch` statement to determine the type of intrinsic instruction being used. The `IntrinsicInfo` object is used to store information about the intrinsic instruction, such as its opcode, memory type, pointer value, offset, and alignment. The `CallInst` object is used to" LLVM,NVPTX,1193,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific values of the variables and the behavior of the functions being called. However, based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the next statement will be a call to the `getNode` method of the `DAG` object, passing in the `dl` object as the first argument, the `Node` object as the second argument, and an integer value as the third argument. The integer value is likely to be a constant, as it is being used as an index into the `Ops` vector. The" LLVM,NVPTX,1194,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be a return statement, as the code appears to be defining a function that returns a value of type `SDValue`. The function is using the `DAG` object to create a new load node and then returning the result of that load node. Here is a breakdown of the code snippet: * `SDNode * Node = Op . getNode ( ) ;`: This line gets a pointer to the current node in the DAG. * `LoadSDNode * LD = cast < LoadSDNode > ( Node ) ;`: This line cast" LLVM,NVPTX,1195,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be the return statement, which would return the `result` SDValue. The code snippet is part of a function called `LowerLOADi1`, which is a member function of a class called `TargetLowering`. The function takes two parameters: `Op`, which is an SDValue, and `DAG`, which is a reference to a `SelectionDAG` object. The function first retrieves the `LoadSDNode` object associated with the `Op` SDValue using the `getNode()` method. It then asserts that the load" LLVM,NVPTX,1196,"The next statement after the `case : return LowerCONCAT_VECTORS ( Op , DAG ) ;` statement is `case : return LowerSTORE ( Op , DAG ) ;`." LLVM,NVPTX,1197,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `Lower` function and the values of the `Op` and `DAG` parameters. However, based on the pattern of the code snippet, it is likely that the next statement will be a `case` statement for a different string literal, such as ``." LLVM,NVPTX,1198,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `Ops.push_back(N->getOperand());` This statement adds the operand at index `` of the node `N` to the `Ops` vector. The `Ops` vector is used to store the operands of the instruction being lowered." LLVM,NVPTX,1199,"This code snippet appears to be a part of a function that is handling memory operations in a compiler. The function is taking a node `N` as an argument, and based on the number of operands in `N`, it is creating a new memory operation using the `DAG` object. The function is using a `switch` statement to determine the operation to perform based on the number of operands in `N`. The `default` case is returning an empty `SDValue`, and the `case` statements are handling specific numbers of operands. The function is also using a `SmallVector" LLVM,NVPTX,1200,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `ScalarRes.push_back(Res);` This statement adds the result of the memory intrinsic operation (which is a vector of values) to the `ScalarRes` vector. The `ScalarRes` vector is then used to create a new vector of values that is returned as the result of the function." LLVM,NVPTX,1201,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `OtherOps.push_back(N->getOperand(i));` This line adds the operand at index `i` of the `LoadSDNode` `LD` to the `SmallVector` `OtherOps`. The `SmallVector` is a container class that is used to store a small number of elements contiguously in memory, and is often used in place of `std::vector` when the number of elements is known at compile time. In this case, the `SmallVector` is being used to" LLVM,NVPTX,1202,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be the initialization of the `OtherOps` vector with the operands of the load instruction. The code snippet is part of a function that is generating a load instruction with a specific type and extension type. The `OtherOps` vector is used to store the operands of the load instruction, and it is initialized with the operands of the original load instruction, which are obtained using the `getOperand` method of the `SDNode` class. The `push_back` method is used to add the operands to the `OtherOps`" LLVM,NVPTX,1203,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return VT == ;` This statement is a return statement that returns a boolean value indicating whether the variable `VT` is equal to the string literal ``." LLVM,NVPTX,1204,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be a return statement, as the method `getScalarShiftAmountTy` is declared as `const` and does not modify any state. Therefore, the next statement is likely to be a return statement that returns a value of type `MVT`, which is the return type of the method. The return value is likely to be computed based on the input parameter `LHSTy`, which is of type `EVT`. Without knowing the specific implementation of the method, it is not possible to predict the exact return value that will be returned" LLVM,NVPTX,1205,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be a return statement, as the method `getScalarShiftAmountTy` is declared as `const` and does not modify any state. Therefore, the next statement is likely to be a return statement that returns a value of type `MVT`, which is the return type of the method. The return value is likely to be computed based on the input parameter `LHSTy`, which is of type `EVT`. Without knowing the specific implementation of the method, it is not possible to predict the exact return value that will be returned" LLVM,NVPTX,1206,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return ;` Explanation: The `getSetCCResultType` function is defined to return a string literal based on the input `EVT` type. If the `EVT` type is a vector, the function returns a string literal with the vector's number of elements. Otherwise, the function returns a string literal with no arguments. In this code snippet, the `EVT` type is not a vector, so the function will return the string literal with no arguments. The next statement is therefore" LLVM,NVPTX,1207,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it appears to be part of a larger program and the context is not provided. However, based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the next statement will likely be a continuation of the `for` loop that is currently being executed. In this loop, the code is iterating over the `Outs` vector and processing each element in turn. The current statement is likely to be the last statement in the loop body, and the next statement will likely be the first statement in the loop body for the next iteration." LLVM,NVPTX,1208,"Based on the code snippet provided, it appears to be a part of a larger function that is performing a shift operation on a value. The code is using the `SDValue` class from the `llvm` library to represent values and perform operations on them. The code is checking if the shift amount is greater than the number of bits in the value, and if so, it is performing a shift operation on the value. The shift operation is being performed using the `ShOpHi` and `ShOpLo` functions, which are not defined in the code snippet provided. The code is also using the" LLVM,NVPTX,1209,"Based on the code snippet you provided, it appears to be a part of a function that is handling a specific operation in a compiler. The function is taking in an ""Op"" object and performing a shift operation on it. The code is using the ""assert"" statement to check that the operation code of the ""Op"" object is a specific value (represented by the token """"). If the assertion fails, the function will terminate with an error. After the assertion, the function is retrieving the value type and size in bits of the ""Op"" object, and then retr" LLVM,NVPTX,1210,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet without knowing the context in which it is being executed. However, based on the code snippet provided, it appears to be a part of a function that is processing a memory intrinsic node. The function is using a switch statement to handle different types of memory intrinsics, and the code snippet is part of the case for a specific type of memory intrinsic. The function is creating a new memory intrinsic node using the `DAG.getMemIntrinsicNode()` function, and it is passing in the `Opcode`, `DL`, `DA" LLVM,NVPTX,1211,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return SDValue ( ) ;` This is because the code snippet ends with a `switch` statement that has a `default` case that returns an `SDValue`. The `default` case is executed when none of the other cases match the value of `NumElts`. Since `NumElts` is not equal to any of the other cases, the `default` case is executed, and the function returns an `SDValue`." LLVM,NVPTX,1212,"This code snippet appears to be part of a function that is trying to optimize the use of nodes in a graph. The function takes a node `N` as input and checks if it has a certain number of uses (`numUses`) and if any of those uses are not of a specific opcode (`nonAddCount`). If the number of uses is greater than or equal to a certain threshold, the function returns an empty `SDValue`. If `nonAddCount` is non-zero, the function checks the order of the nodes in the graph and if the order of `N` is less than the order of `" LLVM,NVPTX,1213,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet without knowing the specific implementation of the `PerformMULCombine`, `PerformSHLCombine`, and `PerformANDCombine` functions, as well as the values of the `N`, `DCI`, and `OptLevel` variables. However, based on the syntax and the fact that the code is using a `switch` statement, it is likely that the next statement will be one of the following: * `return PerformMULCombine ( N , DCI , OptLevel ) ;` * `return" LLVM,NVPTX,1214,The next statement after the `default` case is the `case ` statement. LLVM,NVPTX,1215,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `SDValue LoadChain = NewLD.getValue(NumElts);` This line of code is assigning the value of the `NumElts`th element of the `NewLD` SDValue to the `LoadChain` variable. The `NumElts` variable is defined earlier in the code snippet as the number of elements in the vector being loaded." LLVM,NVPTX,1216,"Based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the next statement will be: O << << sz << ; This is because the previous statement ends with a continue, which means that the loop will continue to the next iteration without executing any further statements in the current iteration. The next statement after the continue is O << << sz << ;, which is likely to be part of the loop body." LLVM,NVPTX,1217,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific values of the string literals and the input to the function. However, based on the pattern of the code, it appears that the function is a large switch statement that returns a string literal based on the value of the input. The next statement is likely to be another case statement, with a string literal as the case value and a return statement with a string literal as the return value." LLVM,NVPTX,1218,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet as it is a complex piece of code with many branches and variables. However, based on the context, it appears that the code is generating a string representation of a type, possibly for debugging purposes. The code is using a number of variables and functions that are not defined in the snippet, so it is not possible to provide a more detailed analysis. However, some of the key elements of the code include: * The use of the `isa` function to check the type of a variable. * The use of the `cast` function to cast" LLVM,NVPTX,1219,"Based on the code snippet you provided, it appears to be a part of a function that is generating a string representation of a value type. The code is using a `SmallVector` to store the value type parts and is iterating over them to generate the string. The next statement of the code snippet is: ``` O << << retAlignment << << totalsz << ; ``` This statement is using the `O` object to output a string that includes the return alignment, total size, and a string" LLVM,NVPTX,1220,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the program depends on the specific inputs and the implementation of the `getSetCCResultType` method. However, based on the name of the method and the parameters it takes, it is likely that the method is used to set the result type of a conditional expression. The `EVT` parameter is likely an enumeration that represents the type of the result, and the `VT` parameter is likely a value of that type. The method is declared as `const`, which means that it does not" LLVM,NVPTX,1221,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be a loop that iterates over the `Outs` vector and performs some operation on each element. The loop will likely use the `idx` variable to keep track of the current index in the vector. Here is a possible next statement: ``` for (unsigned i = 0; i < Outs.size(); i++) { // Perform some operation on Outs[i] } ``` It's difficult to say exactly what the next statement will be without more context, but this is a common pattern in LLVM code." LLVM,NVPTX,1222,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `tmpval = theVal[j];` This is because the loop is iterating over the elements of a vector value, and `tmpval` is being assigned the value of the current element on each iteration. The loop will continue until `j` is equal to `numElems`, which is the number of elements in the vector." LLVM,NVPTX,1223,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `O << << Outs[OIdx].Flags.getByValIndex() << ;`" LLVM,NVPTX,1224,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet without knowing the specific values of the placeholders (e.g. , ). However, based on the structure of the code, it appears to be a loop that iterates over a set of values and performs a series of operations on each value. The loop starts with a check on the number of elements in the set, and then proceeds to perform a series of operations on each element. The operations include getting the value of the element, extending the value if necessary, and storing the value in a memory location" LLVM,NVPTX,1225,"Based on the code snippet you provided, it appears that the `switch` statement is checking the value of `ValVT.getSimpleVT().SimpleTy`. If the value is ``, then the function `LowerSTOREi1` is called with the arguments `Op` and `DAG`. Therefore, the next statement of this code snippet is likely to be the `default` case, which is not shown in the code snippet you provided." LLVM,NVPTX,1226,"Based on the code snippet you provided, it appears that the next statement will be: `return LowerSTOREi1 ( Op , DAG ) ;` This is because the `switch` statement is checking the value of `ValVT.getSimpleVT().SimpleTy`, and if it is not equal to ``, then the `default` case will be executed, which is the `return LowerSTOREi1 ( Op , DAG ) ;` statement." LLVM,NVPTX,1227,"Based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the next statement after the `switch` block would be the `return` statement. The `switch` block is checking the value of `N->getOpcode()` and based on that value, it is calling different functions such as `PerformADDCombine`, `PerformMULCombine`, `PerformSHLCombine`, `PerformANDCombine`, and `PerformREMCombine`. Since the `switch` block does not have a `break` statement after each case, it is possible that the function will continue to" LLVM,NVPTX,1228,"The next statement of this code snippet is: return getInlineAsmMemConstraint(ConstraintCode);" LLVM,NVPTX,1229,"The next statement in the code snippet is: opIsLive = true;" LLVM,NVPTX,1230,"Based on the code snippet you provided, it appears that the `PerformDAGCombine` function is a part of a compiler's code generation process. The function takes a `SDNode` as input, and based on the opcode of the node, it performs a combination of operations to optimize the generated code. The function first retrieves the optimization level from the target machine and stores it in the `OptLevel` variable. It then switches on the opcode of the node, and for the cases of `ADD` and `SUB`, it calls the `PerformADDCombine` function to" LLVM,NVPTX,1231,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return false;` Explanation: The code snippet is checking if the type of the argument `arg` is a pointer type, and if it is, it checks if the element type of the pointer is a struct type. If it is not, it returns `false`. If it is, it checks if the name of the struct type is in a list of special types, and if it is, it returns `true`. If it is not, it returns `false`. So, the next statement of this code snippet is `return false" LLVM,NVPTX,1232,"The next statement is: `const Type * PTy = dyn_cast < PointerType > ( Ty ) ;` This line is using the `dyn_cast` function to cast the `Ty` object to a `PointerType` object. If the cast is successful, the resulting `PointerType` object is stored in the `PTy` variable. If the cast is not successful (i.e., `Ty` is not a `PointerType`), the function returns `false`." LLVM,NVPTX,1233,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `SDValue localcopy = DAG . getFrameIndex ( MF . getFrameInfo ( ) -> CreateStackObject ( totalsize / , , false ) , getPointerTy ( ) ) ;` This line of code creates a new stack object with a size of `totalsize / ` and a type of `getPointerTy()`. The `CreateStackObject()` method is called on the `FrameInfo` object, which is a part of the `MachineFunction" LLVM,NVPTX,1234,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `SDValue result = DAG.getNode(, dl, , newLD);` This statement creates a new SDValue object `result` using the `getNode` method of the `DAG` object, with the following arguments: * ``: The first argument is a string literal that represents the name of the node. * `dl`: The second argument is a `DebugLoc` object that contains debugging information for the node. * `, dl, LD->getChain(), LD->getBasePtr(), LD->getPointerInfo(), LD->isVolatile(), LD->isNonTemporal(), LD->isInvariant(), LD->getAlignment());` This statement is a call to the `getLoad` method of the `DAG` object, which is used to load a value from memory. The method takes several parameters, including the type of the value to" LLVM,NVPTX,1236,"Based on the code snippet you provided, it appears to be a switch statement in a programming language. The switch statement is checking the value of a string literal, and based on that value, it is returning a different value. Without knowing the specific values of the string literals or the context in which this code is being used, it is difficult to predict the next statement that will be executed. However, based on the structure of the switch statement, it is likely that the next statement will be one of the following: * `return SDValue ( ) ;` * `return LowerGlobalAddress ( Op" LLVM,NVPTX,1237,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `SDValue Tmp4 = DAG.getStore(Tmp1, Tmp2, Tmp3, dl, Alignment, isVolatile);` This is a call to the `getStore` method of the `DAG` object, which creates a new `StoreSDNode` with the given arguments. The `Tmp1`, `Tmp2`, and `Tmp3` values are used as the chain, base pointer, and value operands of the store, respectively. The `dl` value is used as the" LLVM,NVPTX,1238,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `if ( ! DirectCallee ) {` This is because the code checks if `DirectCallee` is null, and if it is, it enters the `if` block. The next statement is to check if `CI` is a `CallInst` and if `getAlign` returns true for the given arguments. If `getAlign` returns true, the function returns an `Align` object with the given alignment. Otherwise, it continues to the next statement, which is the `if` block." LLVM,NVPTX,1239,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `if ( ! DirectCallee ) {`" LLVM,NVPTX,1240,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific values of the variables and the implementation of the `isKernelFunction` and `Align` functions. However, based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the next statement will be a call to the `Align` function, which is used to align a value to a specific boundary. The `Align` function takes two arguments: the value to be aligned, and the alignment boundary. In this case, the value to be aligned is `std::max(uint64_t(` and ends at the index `OpsCount - 1`, so if the loop completes without returning, it means that all operands are undefined, and the function returns an empty `SDValue`." LLVM,NVPTX,1246,"Based on the code snippet provided, it appears to be generating a string representation of a type. The next statement is likely to be a call to `getValueType` to get the value type of the type being processed. The code is using the LLVM IR library to generate a string representation of a type, and it is checking the type of the value being processed to determine how to generate the string. The `getValueType` function is likely to be a helper function that returns the value type of a type, and the code is using this function to determine the value type of the type being processed. The next" LLVM,NVPTX,1247,"Based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the `isLegalAddressingMode` function is checking whether a given addressing mode is legal for a particular target architecture. The function takes several parameters, including a `DataLayout` object, an `AddrMode` object, a type pointer, and an unsigned integer representing the address space. The function first checks if the `BaseGV` field of the `AddrMode` object is non-null. If it is, the function checks if the `BaseOffs`, `HasBaseReg`, or `Scale` fields of the `AddrMode" LLVM,NVPTX,1248,"Based on the code snippet provided, it is difficult to predict the next statement with certainty. However, based on the context and the patterns observed in the code, it is likely that the next statement will be another call to the `setOperationAction` function, possibly with a different set of arguments. The `setOperationAction` function appears to be used to set the action for a specific operation, and the arguments passed to the function are used to specify the operation, the type of the operands, and the action to be taken. The function is called multiple times in the code snippet, with different arguments, to" LLVM,NVPTX,1249,"The next statement after the code snippet you provided is: delete DwarfRangesSection;" LLVM,NVPTX,1250,"The next statement of this code snippet is: case AtomicRMWInst::BinOp::Add:" LLVM,NVPTX,1251,"Based on the code snippet you provided, it appears to be part of a function that is generating a string representation of a LLVM IR function. The code is using the LLVM C++ API to access and manipulate the function's arguments, return type, and other properties. The next statement of the code snippet is likely to be a continuation of the `for` loop that is iterating over the function's arguments. The loop is using the `Args` vector to access the function's arguments, and the `Outs` vector to access the function's return values. The loop is also using" LLVM,NVPTX,1252,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be: `if (PTy->getElementType() != specialTypes[0] && PTy->getElementType() != specialTypes[1] && PTy->getElementType() != specialTypes[2]) return false;` This is because the code is checking if the type of the pointer `PTy` is not one of the special types in the `specialTypes` array. If it is not, the function returns `false`." LLVM,NVPTX,1253,"The next statement after the code snippet you provided is: `if (STy == nullptr) return false;` This is because the `dyn_cast` function returns a null pointer if the cast is not possible, and the code checks if the result of the cast is null before using it." LLVM,NVPTX,1254,"Based on the code snippet provided, it is difficult to predict the next statement with certainty. However, based on the context and the patterns present in the code, it is likely that the next statement will be another `if` statement or a `continue` statement. The code snippet appears to be part of a function that is processing a list of values and performing some operations on them. The function takes a number of parameters, including a `DAG` object, a `dl` object, a `PtrVT` object, and a `Root` object. The function is also using a number of other variables" LLVM,NVPTX,1255,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet as it appears to be a part of a larger switch statement and the context is not provided. However, based on the syntax, it appears that the next statement will be another case statement or a default statement." LLVM,NVPTX,1256,"Based on the code snippet you provided, it appears that the next statement will be: `case : case : case : case : case : case : case : case : case : case : case : case : case : case CreateStackObject ( totalsize / , , false ) , getPointerTy ( ) ) ;` This line of code creates a new stack object with the specified size and alignment, and returns a pointer to the object. The pointer is stored in the `localcopy` variable." LLVM,NVPTX,1261,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `SDValue newLD = DAG.getLoad(, dl, LD->getChain(), LD->getBasePtr(), LD->getPointerInfo(), LD->isVolatile(), LD->isNonTemporal(), LD->isInvariant(), LD->getAlignment());` This statement is a call to the `getLoad` method of the `DAG` object, which is a member of the `SDNode` class. The `getLoad` method is used to create a" LLVM,NVPTX,1262,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `Ops.push_back(ExtVal);` This statement adds the `ExtVal` SDValue to the end of the `Ops` vector." LLVM,NVPTX,1263,"Based on the code snippet provided, it is difficult to predict the next statement with certainty. However, based on the context of the code, it appears that the next statement will likely be a case statement or a switch statement that handles different intrinsic operations. The code snippet is part of a function called `ReplaceINTRINSIC_W_CHAIN`, which is likely part of a compiler or interpreter for a programming language. The function takes a node from a selection dag (SDNode) and a selection dag and a small vector of SDValues (Results) as inputs. It then retrieves the oper" LLVM,NVPTX,1264,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `LdResVTs = DAG . getVTList ( EltVT , EltVT , ) ;` This statement assigns a new value to the `LdResVTs` variable, which is a list of vector types. The `getVTList` method is called on the `DAG` object, which is an instance of the `SelectionDAG` class. This method returns a new vector type list with the specified element types and number of elements. The `E" LLVM,NVPTX,1265,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it appears to be part of a larger function and the context is not provided. However, based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the next statement will be a case statement that handles the case where `NumElts` is equal to 8. In this case, the code will set `Opcode` to the value of the `STR_LIT` token, which is not provided in the code snippet. It will also set `LdResVTs` to the result of calling the `getVT" LLVM,NVPTX,1266,"The next statement of this code snippet is: ScalarRes.push_back(Res);" LLVM,NVPTX,1267,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `ReplaceLoadVector` and `ReplaceINTRINSIC_W_CHAIN` functions, as well as the values of the `N`, `DAG`, and `Results` variables. However, based on the code snippet provided, it is likely that the next statement after the `case :` line will be a call to the `ReplaceINTRINSIC_W_CHAIN` function, passing in the same values for `N" LLVM,NVPTX,1268,"Based on the code snippet you provided, it appears to be a function that takes a `Constraint` object as an argument and returns a pair of values. The function checks the size of the `Constraint` object and then switches on the value of the last element in the object. If the last element is 'c', 'h', or 'r', the function returns a pair with the first element being the size of the `Constraint` object and the second element being a string literal. If the last element is 'l' or 'N', the function returns a pair with the first element being the size of the" LLVM,NVPTX,1269,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the code depends on the specific values of the variables and the input to the function. However, based on the structure of the code, it appears that the function is using a series of `case` statements to handle different inputs. The `case` statements are checking the value of a string literal, and returning a different string literal depending on the value. Without more information about the specific values of the variables and the input to the function, it is not possible to predict the exact output of the function." LLVM,NVPTX,1270,"Based on the code snippet you provided, it appears to be a part of a C++ program that defines a class called `TargetLowering`. The class has a method called `getTargetNodeName` that takes an unsigned integer `Opcode` as a parameter and returns a string literal based on the value of `Opcode`. The method uses a `switch` statement to handle different values of `Opcode`. For each value of `Opcode`, the method returns a different string literal. The string literals are represented by `` in the code snippet you provided. Based on" LLVM,NVPTX,1271,"Based on the code snippet you provided, it appears to be a part of a function that is handling memory operations. The function is checking the operands of a memory operation and setting various fields of an `Info` object based on the operands. The next statement of the code snippet you provided is: ``` case : ``` This is a `switch` statement that checks the value of a string literal. The code inside the `switch` statement will be executed if the value of the string literal matches the value of the `opc` field of the `Info` object." LLVM,NVPTX,1272,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the code depends on the specific values of the string literals and the input to the switch statement. However, based on the syntax of the code, it appears that the switch statement is checking the value of a string variable against a series of string literals, and executing a different block of code depending on which string literal matches. Without more information about the specific values of the string literals and the input to the switch statement, it is not possible to predict the next statement that will be executed." LLVM,NVPTX,1273,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `InVals.push_back(p);`" LLVM,NVPTX,1274,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `if ( isABI || isKernel ) {`" LLVM,NVPTX,1275,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be: `return result;` This is because the code is creating a new load instruction (`newLD`) and then creating a new node (`result`) using the `getNode` method of the `DAG` object. The `result` node is then being added to an array of operands (`Ops`) that will be used to create a new node. The `return` statement is not explicitly shown in the code snippet, but it is likely that the function will return the `result` node as its output." LLVM,NVPTX,1276,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be the return statement, which returns the result of the `getMergeValues` method called on the `DAG` object. The `getMergeValues` method takes an array of `SDValue` objects, a `Num` object, and a `DL` object as arguments, and returns a new `SDValue` object that represents the merged values. In this case, the `Ops` array contains the `result` and the `LD->getChain()` values, and the `Num` object is likely to be a constant representing the number" LLVM,NVPTX,1277,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `Result = DAG.getStore(Tmp1, dl, Tmp3, Tmp2, ST->getPointerInfo(), isVolatile, isNonTemporal, Alignment);` This statement is a call to the `getStore` method of the `DAG` object, which is used to create a new store node in the DAG. The method takes several arguments, including the value to be stored, the data layout, the pointer to the memory location, the alignment, and the volatility and non-tempor" LLVM,NVPTX,1278,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `Tmp3 = DAG.getNode(, dl, , Tmp3);` This statement is a call to the `getNode()` method of the `DAG` object, which is a member of the `SelectionDAG` class. The method takes four arguments: the first is a string literal representing the name of the node to be created, the second is a `SDLoc` object representing the location of the node, the third is a string literal representing the type of the node," LLVM,NVPTX,1279,"Based on the code snippet you provided, it is difficult to predict the next statement with certainty. However, based on the context and the patterns in the code, it is likely that the next statement will be another call to `setOperationAction` or `setTruncStoreAction`, with the same or similar arguments as the previous calls. The code appears to be setting up a series of actions for a specific operation or set of operations, with each action being defined by a call to `setOperationAction` or `setTruncStoreAction`. The arguments passed to these functions appear to be strings that represent the operation" LLVM,NVPTX,1280,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `SDValue NewLD = DAG.getMemIntrinsicNode(Opcode, DL, LdResVTs, &OtherOps[], OtherOps.size(), MemSD->getMemoryVT(), MemSD->getMemOperand());`" LLVM,NVPTX,1281,"Based on the code snippet provided, it appears to be generating a string representation of a function call. The code is using the LLVM IR (Intermediate Representation) to generate the string. The next statement in the code snippet is: O << << align << ; This line is appending a string literal to the output string, followed by the alignment value, and then another string literal. The alignment value is being retrieved from the `Outs` vector, which appears to be a vector of function call arguments. The `align` variable" LLVM,NVPTX,1282,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return MF.getDenormalMode(APFloat::IEEEsingle()).Output == DenormalMode::PreserveSign;` Explanation: The code snippet is checking if the `FtzEnabled` flag is set to a value greater than ``. If it is, the function returns the value of `FtzEnabled`. Otherwise, it returns the result of the expression `MF.getDenormalMode(APFloat::IEEEsingle()).Output == DenormalMode::PreserveSign`. The `" LLVM,NVPTX,1283,"The next statement after `return FtzEnabled ;` would be the closing brace `}` of the function, indicating the end of the function body." LLVM,NVPTX,1284,"The next statement of this code snippet is: O << << getPointerTy( ) . getSizeInBits( ) << ; This statement is part of the first branch of the if-else statement, which is executed when the return type of the function is a pointer type. The statement writes the size of the pointer type in bits to the output stream O, using the << operator to concatenate the string literal and the result of the getSizeInBits() method." LLVM,NVPTX,1285,"Based on the code snippet you provided, it seems that the next statement will be: `case 'f':` This is because the code is using a `switch` statement to handle different cases, and the previous cases were 'b', 'c', 'h', 'r', and 'l'. The next case is 'f', so the code will jump to the corresponding block of code." LLVM,NVPTX,1286,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet without knowing the specific values of the variables and the context in which the code is being executed. However, based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the next statement will be a `return` statement, as the function is checking the type of the value and returning a `SDValue` object if the type is not a vector or if the vector is not simple. If the vector is simple, the function will continue to execute the code in the `switch` statement to determine the appropriate opcode and operands for the memory intrinsic." LLVM,NVPTX,1287,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `SDValue LoadChain = NewLD . getValue ( NumElts ) ;` This line of code retrieves the value of the `NumElts`th element of the `NewLD` SDValue, which is the result of the `getMemIntrinsicNode` call. The `LoadChain` variable is then assigned this value." LLVM,NVPTX,1288,"The next statement of this code snippet is: ScalarRes.push_back(Res);" LLVM,NVPTX,1289,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet without knowing the values of the variables and the context in which the code is being executed. However, based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the next statement will be the start of a loop that will iterate over the elements of the vector `OutVals`. Inside the loop, the code will create a new vector `StoreVal` that will be used to store the values of the elements of `OutVals` in the memory location specified by `Offset`. The code will also update the value of `Offset` to point to the next memory" LLVM,NVPTX,1290,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `case : if ( AM . HasBaseReg ) return false ;`" LLVM,NVPTX,1291,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it appears to be part of a larger function and the context is not provided. However, based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the next statement will be a return statement, as the last line of the code snippet is `return DAG . getNode ( , dl , , Chain ) ;`, which suggests that the function is returning a value." LLVM,NVPTX,1292,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `unsigned Opcode = ;` This line of code is assigning a value to the `Opcode` variable, which is used to determine the type of operation to be performed on the vector. The value of `Opcode` is set to a specific value based on the type of operation being performed, such as a load or store operation. The value of `Opcode` is used later in the code snippet to determine the type of operation to be performed." LLVM,NVPTX,1293,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `LdResVTs = DAG.getVTList(ListVTs);` This line is part of the `switch` statement that determines the opcode and result types for the load instruction. The `LdResVTs` variable is a list of result types for the load instruction, and it is initialized with the `getVTList` method of the `DAG` object. The `ListVTs` array contains the element types for the load instruction, and it is passed as an argument to the `" LLVM,NVPTX,1294,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be: `SDValue Res = DAG.getNode(Opcode, DL, LdResVTs, OtherOps);` This is because the code is setting up the arguments for a call to `DAG.getNode()`, which is a method that creates a new node in the DAG (Directed Acyclic Graph) representing the instruction sequence. The `Opcode` variable is being set to the opcode of the instruction to be generated, and the `LdResVTs` variable is being set to the" LLVM,NVPTX,1295,"The next statement in the code snippet is: return std::make_pair(, &); This is the final statement in the code snippet, so there is no next statement." LLVM,NVPTX,1296,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be the return statement, which returns a value of type `SDValue` and is constructed using the `DAG` object. The return statement is likely to be of the form: return DAG.getNode(, dl, Node->getValueType(), &Ops[], Ops.size()); Here, `` is a string literal that represents the name of the node to be created, `` is a numeric" LLVM,NVPTX,1297,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `Ops.push_back(DAG.getNode(, dl, EltVT, SubOp, DAG.getIntPtrConstant(j)));` This statement adds a new node to the `Ops` vector, which is a vector of nodes in the DAG. The node is created using the `DAG.getNode` method, which takes several arguments: * ``: A string literal that represents the name of the node. * `dl`:" LLVM,NVPTX,1298,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it appears to be part of a larger function and the context is not provided. However, based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the next statement will be related to the handling of the return value of the function. The code snippet appears to be handling the return value of a function that takes a variable number of arguments. The function appears to be using the `SDValue` class to represent the return value, and the `DAG` class to represent the data access graph. The code snippet is using the `getNode`" LLVM,NVPTX,1299,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `SDValue newLD = DAG.getLoad(, dl, LD->getChain(), LD->getBasePtr(), LD->getPointerInfo(), LD->isVolatile(), LD->isNonTemporal(), LD->isInvariant(), LD->getAlignment());` This statement is a call to the `getLoad` method of the `DAG` object, passing in various parameters related to the load instruction. The method returns a new `SDValue` object representing the loaded" LLVM,NVPTX,1300,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific values of the variables and the behavior of the functions being called. However, based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the next statement will be a call to the `getNode` method of the `DAG` object, passing in several arguments. The first argument to `getNode` will be a string literal, which is either `` or ``, depending on the value of the `isABI` variable. The second argument will be the `" LLVM,NVPTX,1301,"It's difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the values of the variables and the specific implementation of the DAG class. However, based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the next statement will be: Chain = DAG.getNode(isABI ? : , dl, , Chain, DAG.getConstant(isABI ? sizesofar : idx, ), tmpval); This statement is likely to" LLVM,NVPTX,1302,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `ST` object and the values of its member variables. However, based on the code provided, it is likely that the next statement will be a call to the `getValue` method of the `ST` object, as this is the last method called in the code snippet. Here is a possible next statement: ``` SDValue Tmp4 = ST->getValue(); ``` This statement assigns the result of the `getValue` method to a new `SDValue` object called" LLVM,NVPTX,1303,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return NewSt;` This statement returns the `NewSt` value, which is the result of the `getMemIntrinsicNode` function call. The `getMemIntrinsicNode` function is used to create a new memory intrinsic node, and the `NewSt` value is the result of this function call." LLVM,NVPTX,1304,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet without knowing the context and the specific values of the variables used in the code. However, based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the next statement will be a call to the `getMemIntrinsicNode` method of the `DAG` object, which is likely to return a `MemIntrinsicSDNode` object. The `MemIntrinsicSDNode` object will then be used to create a new `SDValue` object, which will be added to the `Results` vector." LLVM,NVPTX,1305,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `SDValue NewLD = DAG.getMemIntrinsicNode(Opcode, DL, LdResVTs, &OtherOps[], OtherOps.size(), MemSD->getMemoryVT(), MemSD->getMemOperand());` This statement creates a new memory intrinsic node using the `DAG.getMemIntrinsicNode()` method, passing in the `Opcode`, `DL`, `LdResVTs`, `OtherOps`, `OtherO" LLVM,NVPTX,1306,"The next statement of this code snippet is: ScalarRes.push_back(Res);" LLVM,NVPTX,1307,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet without knowing the context and the values of the variables involved. However, based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the next statement could be a call to the `getNode` method of the `DAG` object, passing in the `Op` and `Offset` variables as arguments. The `getNode` method is used to create a new node in the DAG, and it is likely that the next statement is creating a new node in the DAG with the `Op` and `Offset` variables as inputs." LLVM,NVPTX,1308,"Based on the code snippet provided, it appears to be part of a function that is generating a call to a function. The function takes a `CallInst` as an argument, and it appears to be generating a call to a function with a name that is stored in the `CallInst`. The function is also taking a `Type` as an argument, which is used to determine the alignment and size of the function's return value. The next statement in the code snippet is: ``` O << << align << ; ``` This statement is" LLVM,NVPTX,1309,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it appears to be a part of a larger program and the context is not provided. However, based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the next statement may be a call to the `setOperationAction` function, passing in a string literal, a string literal, and the value `Custom`." LLVM,NVPTX,1310,"The next statement of this code snippet is: O << << align << ; Explanation: The code snippet is part of a function that is generating a string representation of a function call. The function takes a `CallInst` as input and generates a string that represents the call, including the function name, the argument types, and the return type. The code snippet is responsible for generating the string representation of the function's return type. It first checks if the return type is a by-value type, and if so," LLVM,NVPTX,1311,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `O << << align << ;` This statement is part of the `if` block that checks if the type of the current argument is an aggregate type, a vector type, or an integer type with a specific bit width. If any of these conditions are true, the code inside the `if` block will be executed. In this statement, the `O` object is being used to output a string literal, followed by the `align` variable, which is the alignment of the current argument," LLVM,NVPTX,1312,"Based on the code snippet you provided, it appears that the next statement will be: setOperationAction(, , Custom); This is because the previous statement sets the operation action for a specific instruction to ""Expand"", and the next statement is setting the operation action for a different instruction to ""Custom""." LLVM,NVPTX,1313,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `unsigned numElems = ;` This line of code declares a variable `numElems` and initializes it to the value of ``. The value of `` is not specified in the code snippet, so it could be any value." LLVM,NVPTX,1314,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be the return statement, which returns the value of the `combineRepeatedFPDivisors` method. The value returned is the result of the bitwise AND operation between the `NUM_LIT` constant and the `combineRepeatedFPDivisors` method. Therefore, the next statement of this code snippet is likely to be: ``` return combineRepeatedFPDivisors & NUM_LIT; ```" LLVM,NVPTX,1315,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be the return statement, which returns the value of the `combineRepeatedFPDivisors` method. The value returned is the result of the bitwise AND operation between the `NUM_LIT` constant and the `combineRepeatedFPDivisors` method. Therefore, the next statement of this code snippet is likely to be: ``` return combineRepeatedFPDivisors & NUM_LIT; ```" LLVM,NVPTX,1316,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `*name += suffix.str();` This statement appends the string representation of the `suffix` object to the end of the `name` string. The `suffix` object is a `std::stringstream` object that was created earlier in the code snippet, and it contains the string representation of the `idx` variable. The `str()` method of the `suffix` object returns the string representation of the object, which is then appended to the `name` string using the `+=` operator." LLVM,NVPTX,1317,"The next statement of this code snippet is: return ;" LLVM,NVPTX,1318,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be the return statement, which returns the scalar shift amount for the given data layout and element type. The `getScalarShiftAmountTy` function is a member function of the `MVT` class, and it is used to get the scalar shift amount for a given data layout and element type. The function takes two parameters: the first is a reference to a `DataLayout` object, which represents the data layout of the target machine, and the second is an `EVT` object, which represents the element type of the vector. The function returns a scalar shift" LLVM,NVPTX,1319,The next statement after `return true ;` would be the end of the function or method. LLVM,NVPTX,1320,The next statement after `return true ;` would be the end of the function or method. LLVM,NVPTX,1321,"The next statement of this code snippet is: return true;" LLVM,NVPTX,1322,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `const std::string TypeName = STy && !STy->isLiteral() ? STy->getName() : ;` This statement is assigning the result of the ternary operator to the variable `TypeName`. The ternary operator is used to check if `STy` is not a literal and if it is not, then it returns the name of the struct type, otherwise it returns the string literal ``." LLVM,NVPTX,1323,"The next statement after the `if` statement would be the `return true` statement, as the `if` statement is only executed if the condition is true. Therefore, if the `isTypeLegal` function returns true, the `return true` statement would be executed and the function would return true." LLVM,NVPTX,1324,The next statement after the `if` block is the `return false` statement. LLVM,NVPTX,1325,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be a call to the `CreateMemCpy` function, which is used to create a memory copy instruction. The function takes several arguments, including the source and destination addresses, the size of the memory block to be copied, and the alignment of the memory blocks. Here is an example of how the `CreateMemCpy` function might be called: ``` Builder.CreateMemCpy(DstAddr, SrcAddr, Size, Align); ``` This statement creates a memory copy instruction that copies the data from the source address" LLVM,NVPTX,1326,"The next statement of this code snippet is: LoopIndex->addIncoming(NewIndex, LoopBB); This statement adds an incoming value to the PHI node LoopIndex, which is the loop variable for the memcpy loop. The incoming value is NewIndex, which is the result of adding the constant to the previous value of LoopIndex. This adds a new edge to the PHI node, which allows the loop to continue executing until the condition for the loop is met." LLVM,NVPTX,1327,The next statement after `return ;` would be the end of the function. LLVM,NVPTX,1328,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be a return statement, as the `getPassName()` function is expected to return a string value. The `` placeholder is a hint that the function should return a string literal, but the actual value returned will depend on the specific implementation of the function." LLVM,NVPTX,1329,"The next statement after `AU.addRequired()` is likely to be `AU.addRequired()->getPassName()`. The `addRequired` method is used to add a required pass to the analysis usage (AU) object, and the `getPassName` method is used to retrieve the name of the pass that was added. Therefore, the next statement is likely to be a call to the `getPassName` method on the `TargetTransformInfoWrapperPass` object that was added to the AU object." LLVM,NVPTX,1330,"The next statement in the code snippet is likely to be a call to the `addPreserved` method of the `AU` object, passing in an instance of the `StackProtector` class as an argument. Here's the predicted next statement: `AU.addPreserved(new StackProtector());`" LLVM,NVPTX,1331,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return false;` The code is checking if there are any aggregate loads or memory intrinsic calls that can be optimized. If there are no such loads or calls, the function returns `false`." LLVM,NVPTX,1332,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `for (LoadInst *LI : AggrLoads) {` This is a for-each loop that iterates over the `AggrLoads` vector and assigns each element to the variable `LI`. The loop body will be executed for each element in the vector." LLVM,NVPTX,1333,"The next statement of the code snippet is: `if ( AggrLoads.size() == && MemCalls.size() == ) { return false; }` This statement checks if the number of aggregated loads and memory calls is equal to the specified number of loads and memory calls. If it is, the function returns false." LLVM,NVPTX,1334,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `AggrLoads.push_back(LI);` Explanation: The code snippet is part of a loop that iterates over the basic blocks of a function, and within each basic block, it iterates over the instructions. The `if` statement checks if the current instruction is a `LoadInst` or a `MemIntrinsic`, and if it is, it checks if the load or store operation is eligible for aggregation. If the load or store operation is eligible, the code pushes the load instruction onto" LLVM,NVPTX,1335,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be: `MemCalls.push_back(new MemIntrinsic(LI));` This is because the code is iterating over the instructions in a function and looking for load instructions that have a single use and a specific size. If a load instruction is found that meets these criteria, it is added to a vector called `AggrLoads`. The next step in the code would likely be to create a new `MemIntrinsic` object for the load instruction and add it to the `MemCalls` vector." LLVM,NVPTX,1336,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `expandMemSetAsLoop(Memset, TTI);`" LLVM,NVPTX,1337,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be: ind->addIncoming(newind, loopBB); Explanation: The code snippet creates a loop with a PHI node (ind) that is used to store the current index of the loop. The PHI node is initialized with the value of the loop's starting index (ConstantInt::get(len->getType(), )), and the loop's terminator is set to add the loop's increment (ConstantInt::get(len->getType(), ;` would be the end of the function. LLVM,NVPTX,1340,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `aggrMemsets . push_back ( memsetintr ) ;` This line adds the `memsetintr` instruction to the `aggrMemsets` vector." LLVM,NVPTX,1341,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be: `ind->addIncoming(ConstantInt::get(indType, ), loopBB);` This is because the previous statement `ind = loop.CreatePHI(indType, );` creates a new PHI node `ind` with the type `indType` and the initial value ``. The next statement is likely to be adding an incoming value to this PHI node, which is done using the `addIncoming` method. The incoming value is" LLVM,NVPTX,1342,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be: `if (len_int->getZExtValue() >= MaxAggrCopySize) {` This is because the code is currently checking the length of a memory transfer or memory set instruction, and if the length is greater than or equal to `MaxAggrCopySize`, it will add the instruction to a list of aggregated memory copies or memory sets. The next step is to check if the length is greater than or equal to the maximum aggregate copy size, and if so, add the instruction to the list of aggregated memory copies or" LLVM,NVPTX,1343,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `builder.CreateBr(loopBB);` This statement creates a new branch instruction in the original basic block (origBB) that branches to the loop basic block (loopBB). The `CreateBr` method is used to create a branch instruction, and the `loopBB` argument specifies the target basic block of the branch." LLVM,NVPTX,1344,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `ind->addIncoming(ConstantInt::get(len->getType(), ), origBB);` This statement adds an incoming value to the PHI node `ind` in the basic block `origBB`. The incoming value is a constant integer with the same type as the `len` variable, and the value is ``. This statement is used to initialize the PHI node with the starting value of the loop." LLVM,NVPTX,1345,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be: `ind->addIncoming(ConstantInt::get(indType, ), origBB);` This statement adds an incoming value to the PHI node `ind`, which is the induction variable for the loop. The incoming value is a constant integer with the value ``, and it comes from the basic block `origBB`. This statement is used to initialize the induction variable `ind` with the starting value of the loop." LLVM,NVPTX,1346,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `if ( ( aggrLoads . size ( ) == ) && ( aggrMemcpys . size ( ) == ) && ( aggrMemsets . size ( ) == ) ) return false ;` This statement checks if the number of aggregated loads, memory copies, and memory sets is equal to the specified number of literals. If it is, the function returns false. Otherwise, the function continues to the next block of code." LLVM,NVPTX,1347,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `Value * destAddr = store->getOperand();` Explanation: The code snippet is part of a function that is analyzing a sequence of instructions in a loop. The function is looking for patterns of instructions that can be optimized, specifically, it is looking for a sequence of load, store, and memset instructions that can be combined into a single memcpy instruction. The code snippet is analyzing a single instruction, `II`, which is a `LoadInst`. It is checking if the" LLVM,NVPTX,1348,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `Value * len = ConstantInt :: get ( Type :: getInt32Ty ( Context ) , numLoads ) ;` This line of code is creating a constant integer value `len` with the type `int32` and the value `numLoads`, which is the size of the load instruction's type. The `ConstantInt` class is used to create a constant integer value, and the `getInt32Ty` method is used to get the type of the constant integer. The `get` method is then used to" LLVM,NVPTX,1349,"The next statement of the code snippet is: `Value * CopyLen = ConstantInt :: get ( Type :: getInt32Ty ( Context ) , NumLoads ) ;` This line of code creates a constant integer value that represents the length of the copy operation. The `ConstantInt` class is used to create a constant integer value, and the `getInt32Ty` method is used to get the type of the integer value. The `NumLoads` variable is used to specify the number of loads that are being copied, and the `Context` variable is used to specify the" LLVM,NVPTX,1350,"Based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the next statement will be: `if (IntrCall->getDest()->getType()->isPointerTy()) {` This is because the code is currently checking if the `MemIntrinsic` instruction is a `MemCpyInst` or a `MemSetInst`, and if the destination operand of the instruction is a pointer type. If the destination operand is a pointer type, then the code will continue to the next statement, which is the `if` statement you mentioned." LLVM,NVPTX,1351,"The next statement of the code snippet is: `expandMemMoveAsLoop(Memmove, TTI);`" LLVM,NVPTX,1352,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `if (AggrLoads.size() == && MemCalls.size() == ) {` This is a conditional statement that checks whether the number of aggregated loads and memory calls is equal to the specified number of loads and calls. If the condition is true, the function returns false." LLVM,NVPTX,1353,"This code snippet is creating a loop that copies a value from one memory location to another. It is using the LLVM IR (Intermediate Representation) to generate the code for this loop. The first line of the code creates a new basic block (BB) called `loopBB` and adds it to the function. The `ind` variable is a pointer to the current index in the loop, and `origBB` is the basic block that the loop starts from. The second line creates a new instruction that stores the value of `val` at the memory location pointed to by `dstAddr`" LLVM,NVPTX,1354,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `loop.CreateBr(newBB);` This statement creates a new branch instruction in the loop basic block, which will branch to the new basic block created earlier. The new basic block is the one that will contain the loop body." LLVM,NVPTX,1355,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `ind->addIncoming(newind, loopBB);` This statement adds a new incoming value to the PHI node `ind`, which is the loop induction variable. The new incoming value is `newind`, which is the result of adding `` to the current value of `ind`. The incoming block is `loopBB`, which is the basic block that contains the loop." LLVM,NVPTX,1356,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be a conditional branch instruction, specifically a `br i1` instruction, which branches to either the `LoopBB` or `NewBB` basic block based on the value of the loop index. The `br i1` instruction takes two operands: the first is the loop index, and the second is the comparison value. The instruction checks if the loop index is less than the comparison value, and if so, it branches to the `LoopBB` basic block. If the loop index is greater than or equal to the comparison value, it branches to the `" LLVM,NVPTX,1357,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be the creation of a new basic block `FwdLoopBB` using the `BasicBlock::Create` method, with the name ``, the function `F`, and the parent basic block `ExitBB`." LLVM,NVPTX,1358,"The next statement of this code snippet is: LoopBuilder.CreateBr(NewBB); This statement creates a new branch instruction in the loop basic block (LoopBB) that branches to the new basic block (NewBB) created by the splitBasicBlock() function. The branch instruction is created using the CreateBr() method of the IRBuilder class, which takes the basic block to branch to as an argument." LLVM,NVPTX,1359,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the `LowerAggrCopies` constructor is not specified. However, based on the name of the constructor, it is likely that it will create a new instance of the `LowerAggrCopies` class and return it." LLVM,NVPTX,1360,"The next statement of this code snippet is: return ""getPassName"";" LLVM,NVPTX,1361,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the implementation of the `getPassName` method in the derived class. However, based on the syntax and the fact that the method is marked as `const`, it is likely that the next statement will be a return statement that returns a string representing the name of the pass." LLVM,NVPTX,1362,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return this.getPassName ( ) ;`" LLVM,NVPTX,1363,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return this.getPassName ( ) ;`" LLVM,NVPTX,1364,"The next statement of the code snippet is: `Memcpy -> eraseFromParent ( ) ;` This statement is part of the `for` loop that iterates over the `MemCalls` vector, and it erases the `MemCpyInst` object from its parent." LLVM,NVPTX,1365,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be the start of a loop that iterates over the `AggrLoads` vector and performs the copy operation for each load instruction. The loop will likely use the `convertMemCpyToLoop` function to convert the memory copy operation into a loop that copies the data from the source address to the destination address. The loop will also erase the original load and store instructions from the function. Here is a possible next statement: ``` for (LoadInst *LI : AggrLoads) { StoreInst *SI = dyn" LLVM,NVPTX,1366,"The next statement in the code snippet is the return statement, which returns a new instance of the `LowerAlloca` class. The `LowerAlloca` class is a subclass of `BasicBlockPass`, and it is used to lower allocas in the LLVM IR. The `create` function is a factory function that creates a new instance of the `LowerAlloca` class and returns it as a `BasicBlockPass` object." LLVM,NVPTX,1367,"The next statement of this code snippet is: return new ISA_LITLowerAllocaPass();" LLVM,NVPTX,1368,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `LowerAlloca` function and the `BasicBlockPass` class. However, based on the name of the function and the fact that it is a pass for a basic block, it is likely that the next statement will be related to the lowering of alloca instructions within the basic block. Some possible next statements could include: * Iterating over the instructions in the basic block and checking if any of them are alloca instructions. * Lowering the alloca instructions by" LLVM,NVPTX,1369,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `LowerAlloca` function and the `BasicBlockPass` class. However, based on the name of the function and the fact that it is a pass for a basic block, it is likely that the next statement will be related to the lowering of alloca instructions within the basic block. Some possible next statements could include: * Iterating over the instructions in the basic block and checking if any of them are alloca instructions. * Lowering the alloca instructions by" LLVM,NVPTX,1370,"Based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the next statement will be: `NewASCToLocal -> insertAfter ( NewASCToGeneric ) ;` This is because the code is currently iterating over the uses of an `AllocaInst` and for each use, it is checking if the user is a `LoadInst`, `StoreInst`, `GetElementPtrInst`, or `BitCastInst`. If the user is one of these instructions, the code is modifying the instruction to use the new generic pointer instead of the original alloca. After the loop finishes, the code" LLVM,NVPTX,1371,"Based on the code snippet provided, it is difficult to predict the next statement with certainty. However, based on the context and the pattern of the code, it is likely that the next statement will be another `if` statement, similar to the ones already present in the code snippet. The code appears to be iterating over a list of uses of an alloca instruction, and for each use, it is checking if it is a load or store instruction, and if it is, it is modifying the operand of the instruction to point to a new value. The next statement is likely to be another iteration of this" LLVM,NVPTX,1372,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the code depends on the specific implementation of the `LowerAlloca` class and the context in which the code is executed. However, based on the syntax and the fact that the code is returning a new instance of the `LowerAlloca` class, it is likely that the next statement will be a call to a method or property of the `LowerAlloca` class, or a subsequent operation on the returned object." LLVM,NVPTX,1373,The next statement after `return ;` would be the end of the function. LLVM,NVPTX,1374,The next statement after `return ;` would be the end of the function. LLVM,NVPTX,1375,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `LowerAlloca` function and the `FunctionPass` class. However, based on the name of the function and the fact that it is a pass for a function, it is likely that the next statement will be related to the lowering of alloca instructions in the function. Some possible next statements could include: * `LowerAlloca` calling other functions or methods to perform the lowering of alloca instructions. * `LowerAlloca` using a loop" LLVM,NVPTX,1376,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `LowerAlloca` function and the `FunctionPass` class. However, based on the name of the function and the fact that it is a pass for a function, it is likely that the next statement will be related to the lowering of alloca instructions in the function. Some possible next statements could include: * `LowerAlloca` calling other functions or methods to perform the lowering of alloca instructions. * `LowerAlloca` using a loop" LLVM,NVPTX,1377,"Based on the code snippet provided, it is difficult to predict the next statement with certainty. However, based on the context and the patterns seen in the code, it is likely that the next statement will be another `if` statement, similar to the ones seen in the code snippet, that checks the type of the user of the `allocaInst` instruction. The code snippet is part of a pass that is transforming the LLVM IR of a program to add address space casts to instructions that access memory through an `alloca` instruction. The pass is iterating over all the basic blocks in a function" LLVM,NVPTX,1378,"The next statement of the code snippet is: `const auto & AllocaUse = * UI ++ ;` This statement increments the `UI` iterator and assigns the next value in the `AllocaUse` range to a new `AllocaUse` variable. The `auto` keyword is used to deduce the type of the variable from the initializer expression. The `&` symbol indicates that the variable is a reference, meaning that it is an alias for the value in the `UI` iterator." LLVM,NVPTX,1379,"Based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the next statement will be: `allocaInst -> replaceAllUsesWith ( NewASCToGeneric ) ;` This is because the code is currently iterating over the uses of the `allocaInst` instruction, and for each use, it is checking if the user is a `LoadInst` or a `StoreInst`. If the user is a `LoadInst` or a `StoreInst`, it is replacing the use of the `allocaInst` instruction with the `NewASCToGeneric` instruction. Therefore, the next" LLVM,NVPTX,1380,"Based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the next statement will be: `Changed = true ;` This is because the code is currently setting the `Changed` variable to `true`, which indicates that the `allocaInst` instruction has been modified. The next statement is likely to be a continuation of this process, such as updating the uses of the `allocaInst` instruction or inserting new instructions to handle the modified allocation." LLVM,NVPTX,1381,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `if ( GI && GI -> getPointerOperand ( ) == allocaInst ) { GI -> setOperand ( GI -> getPointerOperandIndex ( ) , NewASCToGeneric ) ; continue ; }` This statement is part of a loop that iterates over the uses of the `allocaInst` instruction, and it checks if the current use is a `GetElementPtrInst` instruction that operands with the `allocaInst` instruction. If it is, then it sets the operand of the `GetElementPtr" LLVM,NVPTX,1382,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `while (!ItemsToConvert.empty()) {` This line of code is the start of a `while` loop that will continue to execute as long as the `ItemsToConvert` vector is not empty. The loop will iterate over the elements of the `ItemsToConvert` vector, cloning each instruction in the parameter address space and updating the users of the original instruction to use the new instruction instead." LLVM,NVPTX,1383,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be the return statement, which returns a new instance of the `LowerArgs` class, which is a subclass of `FunctionPass`. The `LowerArgs` class is responsible for lowering the arguments of a function, which is a process of transforming the function's parameters into a more efficient representation that can be used by the target machine. The `createLowerArgsPass` function is a factory function that creates a new instance of the `LowerArgs` class, passing in the `TM` parameter, which is a pointer to" LLVM,NVPTX,1384,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the implementation of the `LowerArgs` class and the `TM` object. However, based on the syntax and the fact that the `LowerArgs` class is being instantiated, it is likely that the next statement will be a call to a method or function that takes the `TM` object as an argument." LLVM,NVPTX,1385,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be a return statement, as the `getPassName()` function is expected to return a string value. The `` placeholder is a hint that the function should return a string literal, but the actual value returned will depend on the specific implementation of the function." LLVM,NVPTX,1386,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be a return statement, as the `getPassName()` function is expected to return a string value. The `` placeholder is a hint that the function should return a string literal, but the actual value returned will depend on the specific implementation of the function." LLVM,NVPTX,1387,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `while (!ValuesToCheck.empty()) {` This line is the beginning of a while loop that will continue to execute as long as the `ValuesToCheck` vector is not empty. The loop will iterate over the elements of the vector and perform some operations on each element." LLVM,NVPTX,1388,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `Instruction * PtrInGlobal = new AddrSpaceCastInst ( Ptr , PointerType :: getWithSamePointeeType ( cast < PointerType > ( Ptr -> getType ( ) ) , ADDRESS_SPACE_GLOBAL ) , Ptr -> getName ( ) , & * InsertPt ) ;` This statement creates a new `AddrSpaceCastInst` instruction, which is a type of instruction that performs an address space cast. The instruction takes four arguments: * `Ptr`:" LLVM,NVPTX,1389,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be: `PtrInGeneric -> setOperand ( , Ptr ) ;` This statement is setting the operand of the `AddrSpaceCastInst` instruction `PtrInGeneric` to the value of the `Ptr` variable. The operand number is specified by the `` placeholder, which is likely to be a numerical literal. The `Ptr` variable is also passed as the second argument to the `setOperand` method, which is used to set the operand of the instruction." LLVM,NVPTX,1390,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `FunctionPass ( ID )` This is a constructor call for the `FunctionPass` class, passing in the `ID` parameter. The `ID` parameter is not defined in this code snippet, so it is likely that it is a member variable of the `FunctionPass` class that is being initialized with a default value. The `TM` parameter is also being initialized with a default value of `nullptr`, which is a null pointer constant. This indicates that the `TM` parameter is optional and can be omitted when creating an instance of the" LLVM,NVPTX,1391,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `FunctionPass ( ID )` This is a constructor call for the `FunctionPass` class, passing in the `ID` parameter. The `ID` parameter is not defined in this code snippet, so it is likely that it is a member variable of the `FunctionPass` class that is being initialized with a default value. The `TM` parameter is also being initialized with a default value of `nullptr`, which is a null pointer constant. This indicates that the `TM` parameter is optional and can be omitted when creating an instance of the" LLVM,NVPTX,1392,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return true;` This is because the `for` loop is iterating over the arguments of the function `F`, and if any of the arguments have the `byval` attribute and are of pointer type, the `handleByValParam` function is called with the address of that argument. If the loop completes without encountering any such arguments, the function returns `true`." LLVM,NVPTX,1393,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return isKernelFunction(F) ? runOnKernelFunction(F) : runOnDeviceFunction(F);` This statement is a ternary operator, which is a shorthand way of writing an if-else statement. It checks the condition `isKernelFunction(F)` and if it is true, it runs the `runOnKernelFunction(F)` function. If the condition is false, it runs the `runOnDeviceFunction(F)` function. The result of the ternary operator is then returned." LLVM,NVPTX,1394,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return isKernelFunction ( F ) ? runOnKernelFunction ( F ) : runOnDeviceFunction ( F ) ;` This statement is a ternary operator, which is a shorthand for an if-else statement. It checks the condition `isKernelFunction ( F )` and if it is true, it runs the function `runOnKernelFunction ( F )`, otherwise it runs the function `runOnDeviceFunction ( F )`." LLVM,NVPTX,1395,"The code snippet you provided is a part of a function called `runOnKernelFunction` that is part of a class called `LowerArgs`. The function takes a `Function` object as an argument and returns a `bool` value. The function appears to be checking if the function being analyzed has a `TM` (TypeManager) object associated with it, and if the `TM` object's `getDrvInterface` method returns a specific string (``). If this condition is true, the function then iterates over the basic blocks and instructions in the function, and" LLVM,NVPTX,1396,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be: `ArgInParam->setAlignment(Func->getParamAlignment(Arg->getArgNo()));` This is because the previous statement, `Value * ArgInParam = new AddrSpaceCastInst(Arg, PointerType::get(StructType, ADDRESS_SPACE_PARAM), Arg->getName(), FirstInst);`, creates a new `AddrSpaceCastInst` object called `ArgInParam` and initializes it with the `Arg` object, the `PointerType` object, and the `FirstInst`" LLVM,NVPTX,1397,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be: `if (PType) {` This is because the code is checking if the `PointerType` object `PType` is non-null, and if it is, it will execute the code inside the `if` statement." LLVM,NVPTX,1398,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `ArgInParam -> replaceAllUsesWith ( AllocA ) ;` This statement replaces all uses of `ArgInParam` with `AllocA`, which is a pointer to the allocated memory." LLVM,NVPTX,1399,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `ArgInParam->setAlignment(Func->getParamAlignment(Arg->getArgNo()+1));` This statement sets the alignment of the `ArgInParam` value to the parameter alignment of the function `Func` for the argument number `Arg->getArgNo()+1`. The `+1` is added to the argument number because the parameter alignment is typically specified for the first argument, which has an argument number of 0." LLVM,NVPTX,1400,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return false;` Explanation: The code snippet defines a lambda function `IsALoadChain` that takes a `Value*` argument and returns a `bool` indicating whether the argument is a load chain. The lambda function uses a `SmallVector` to keep track of the values to check, and it starts with the `Start` value. The `IsALoadChainInstr` lambda function checks whether a given value `V` is a load chain instruction. It does this by checking whether `V` is an" LLVM,NVPTX,1401,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `const DataLayout & DL = Func -> getParent ( ) -> getDataLayout ( ) ;` This line retrieves the data layout of the function's parent module, which is used later in the code snippet to determine the address space of the alloca instruction." LLVM,NVPTX,1402,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be the creation of a new `AllocaInst` object, which is a type of instruction in the LLVM IR. The `AllocaInst` constructor takes several arguments, including the type of the variable being allocated, the address space of the allocation, and the name of the variable. In this case, the type of the variable being allocated is `StructType`, which is obtained by calling the `getElementType()` method on the `PointerType` object `PType`. The address space of the allocation is obtained by calling the `getAllocaAddr" LLVM,NVPTX,1403,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `if (Arg->hasByValAttr()) {`" LLVM,NVPTX,1404,"The next statement in this code snippet is: `if (Arg.getType()->isPointerTy()) {` This is because the `for` loop is iterating over the arguments of the function `F`, and the `if` statement is checking if the current argument `Arg` is a pointer type. If it is, then the code inside the `if` block will be executed." LLVM,NVPTX,1405,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `FirstInst->insertBefore(AllocA);` This statement inserts the `AllocA` instruction before the `FirstInst` instruction in the instruction stream." LLVM,NVPTX,1406,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `Type * StructType = PType->getElementType();` This statement retrieves the element type of the pointer type `PType` and assigns it to the variable `StructType`. The `getElementType()` method is called on the `PointerType` object `PType` to retrieve the type of the elements pointed to by the pointer." LLVM,NVPTX,1407,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `Type * StructType = PType->getElementType();` This statement retrieves the element type of the pointer type `PType` and stores it in the variable `StructType`. The `getElementType()` method is called on the `PType` object, which is a `PointerType` object. The return value of this method is a `Type` object, which is then stored in the `StructType` variable." LLVM,NVPTX,1408,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `while (!ItemsToConvert.empty()) {` This is a loop that will continue until the `ItemsToConvert` vector is empty. The loop will pop the last element from the `ItemsToConvert` vector, clone the instruction in the parameter address space, and then push the new instruction and the old instruction onto the `ItemsToConvert` vector. The loop will also push the old instruction onto the `InstructionsToDelete` vector." LLVM,NVPTX,1409,"The next statement of this code snippet is: return ""getPassName"";" LLVM,NVPTX,1410,"The next statement of this code snippet is: return ""getPassName"";" LLVM,NVPTX,1411,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be: `AllocA -> setAlignment(Func -> getParamAlignment(Arg -> getArgNo() + 1));` This is because the previous statement `AllocA -> setAlignment(Func -> getParamAlignment(Arg -> getArgNo()));` sets the alignment of the `AllocaInst` `AllocA` to the parameter alignment of the function `Func` for the argument number `Arg -> getArgNo()`. The next statement is likely to be the same, but with the argument number incremented by 1." LLVM,NVPTX,1412,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `AllocA->setAlignment(Func->getParamAlignment(Arg->getArgNo()+));` This statement sets the alignment of the `AllocA` instruction, which is an `AllocaInst` instruction, to the parameter alignment of the function `Func` for the argument number `Arg->getArgNo()+`. The `+` is likely a typo and should be removed." LLVM,NVPTX,1413,"The next statement of this code snippet is: Instruction *PtrInGeneric = new AddrSpaceCastInst(PtrInGlobal, Ptr->getType(), Ptr->getName(), &*InsertPt); Explanation: The code snippet is part of a function called ""markPointerAsGlobal"" that takes a pointer value as an argument. The function checks if the pointer is already in the global address space, and if so, it returns. Otherwise, it creates a new instruction that casts the pointer to the global address space and inserts it into the basic block. The new" LLVM,NVPTX,1414,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `InsertPt = ++cast(Ptr)->getIterator();` This statement is incrementing the iterator `InsertPt` to the next instruction in the basic block. The `++` operator is used to increment the iterator, and the `cast(Ptr)` expression is used to cast the `Ptr` pointer to an `Instruction` object. The `getIterator()` method is then called on the `Instruction` object to get the iterator for the next instruction in the basic block." LLVM,NVPTX,1415,"The next statement in this code snippet is: `handleByValParam(&Arg);`" LLVM,NVPTX,1416,"The next statement in the code snippet is: `if (Arg.getType()->isPointerTy()) {`" LLVM,NVPTX,1417,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `Value * ArgInGeneric = new AddrSpaceCastInst(ArgInGlobal, Arg->getType(), Arg->getName(), FirstInst);` This statement creates a new `AddrSpaceCastInst` instruction, which is used to cast the `ArgInGlobal` value to the type of `Arg`. The `ArgInGlobal` value is the result of the previous `AddrSpaceCastInst` instruction, which casts the `Arg` value to the global address space. The new `AddrSpaceCastInst` instruction casts the `Arg" LLVM,NVPTX,1418,"The next statement of this code snippet is: ArgInGlobal->setOperand(, Arg); This statement sets the operand of the global variable ArgInGlobal to the value of the local variable Arg. The placeholder is used to indicate that the operand number should be replaced with a literal value." LLVM,NVPTX,1419,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `if (Arg.getType()->isPointerTy()) {` This line checks if the type of the argument `Arg` is a pointer type. If it is, the code inside the `if` block will be executed." LLVM,NVPTX,1420,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `Arg->getType()->isPointerTy()`" LLVM,NVPTX,1421,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `InsertPt = Arg->getParent()->getEntryBlock().begin();` This statement assigns the `InsertPt` variable to the beginning of the entry block of the parent function of the argument `Arg`. The `getEntryBlock()` method returns the entry block of the function, and the `begin()` method returns an iterator to the first instruction in the block." LLVM,NVPTX,1422,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the program depends on the specific implementation of the `LowerKernelArgs` class and the value of the `TM` variable. However, based on the syntax and the fact that the `LowerKernelArgs` class is being instantiated, it is likely that the next statement will be a call to a method or function that takes the `LowerKernelArgs` object as an argument. The method or function called will depend on the specific implementation of the `LowerKernelArgs` class and the requirements of the" LLVM,NVPTX,1423,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be: `FirstInst->insertAfter(AllocA);` This is because the previous line of code creates a new `AllocaInst` object called `AllocA`, and the next step is likely to be inserting it into the instruction stream after the `FirstInst` instruction." LLVM,NVPTX,1424,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be: `FirstInst->setOperand(0, LI);` This is because the `LoadInst` object `LI` is being created with the `ArgInParam` as its first operand, and the `FirstInst` instruction is being set as the insertion point for the `LoadInst`. The `setOperand` method is used to set the operand of an instruction to a specific value. In this case, the operand being set is the first operand of the `FirstInst` instruction, which is being set to the" LLVM,NVPTX,1425,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be the initialization of the `TM` member variable with the value passed to the constructor. The `TM` member variable is a pointer to a `TargetMachine` object, and it is being initialized with the value of the `TM` parameter passed to the constructor. This means that the `TM` member variable will point to the same `TargetMachine` object as the `TM` parameter passed to the constructor. Here is the predicted next statement of the code snippet: ``` TM = TM; ``` This statement initializes the `TM" LLVM,NVPTX,1426,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be the initialization of the `TM` member variable with the value passed to the constructor. The `TM` member variable is a pointer to a `TargetMachine` object, and it is being initialized with the value of the `TM` parameter passed to the constructor. This means that the `TM` member variable will point to the same `TargetMachine` object as the `TM` parameter passed to the constructor. Here is the predicted next statement of the code snippet: ``` TM = TM; ``` This statement initializes the `TM" LLVM,NVPTX,1427,"The next statement of the code snippet is: `if (Arg.getType()->isPointerTy()) {`" LLVM,NVPTX,1428,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the code depends on the specific implementation of the `LowerStructArgs` class and the context in which the code is executed. However, based on the information provided, it is likely that the code will create a new instance of the `LowerStructArgs` class and return it as the result of the method. The `new` keyword is used to create a new instance of a class, and the `LowerStructArgs` class is the type of the object being created. The parentheses at the end of the statement indicate" LLVM,NVPTX,1429,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the code depends on the specific implementation of the `LowerStructArgs` class and the context in which the code is executed. However, based on the information provided, it is likely that the code will create a new instance of the `LowerStructArgs` class and return it as the result of the method. The `new` keyword is used to create a new instance of a class, and the `LowerStructArgs` class is the type of the object being created. The parentheses at the end of the statement indicate" LLVM,NVPTX,1430,"The next statement in the code snippet is likely to be a call to the `CreateCall` method of the `Function` class, passing in the `CvtFunc` function pointer and the `BitcastArgs` array as arguments. The `CreateCall` method creates a new `CallInst` object and adds it to the function's instruction list. Here's the predicted next statement: ``` CallInst * callInst = Func->CreateCall(CvtFunc, BitcastArgs); ``` This statement creates a new `CallInst` object and adds it to the function's" LLVM,NVPTX,1431,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `CallInst * CvtCall = CallInst::Create(CvtFunc, BitcastArgs, Arg->getName(), FirstInst);` This statement creates a new `CallInst` object, `CvtCall`, which calls the function `CvtFunc` with the argument `BitcastArgs`. The `CallInst` object is created using the `Create` method of the `CallInst` class, and the `BitcastArgs` argument is an array of `Value` objects that represent the arguments to the function call. The `Arg->getName()`" LLVM,NVPTX,1432,"The next statement after the `if` statement in the code snippet you provided is the `handleParam` function call. The `handleParam` function is called with the address of the argument `Arg` as its argument, which is passed by reference. This is because the `Arg` argument has the `ByValAttr` attribute, which means that it is passed by value, but the address of the argument is passed to the function. Therefore, the next statement after the `if` statement is the `handleParam` function call, which takes the address of the `Arg` argument as its argument." LLVM,NVPTX,1433,"The next statement after the `if` statement in the code snippet you provided is the `handleParam` function call. The `handleParam` function is called with the address of the argument `Arg` as its argument, which is passed by reference. This is because the `Arg` argument has the `ByValAttr` attribute, which means that it is passed by value, but the address of the argument is passed to the function. Therefore, the next statement after the `if` statement is the `handleParam` function call, which takes the address of the `Arg` argument as its argument." LLVM,NVPTX,1434,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `LowerStructArgs` function and the `FunctionPass` class. However, based on the name of the function and the fact that it is a member of the `FunctionPass` class, it is likely that the next statement will be related to the lowering of struct arguments in the function. Some possible next statements could include: * A call to a function that lowers struct arguments in the function, such as `LowerStructArgsInFunction`. * A loop that iterates" LLVM,NVPTX,1435,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `LowerStructArgs` function and the `FunctionPass` class. However, based on the name of the function and the fact that it is a member of the `FunctionPass` class, it is likely that the next statement will be related to the lowering of struct arguments in the function. Some possible next statements could include: * A call to a function that lowers struct arguments in the function, such as `LowerStructArgsInFunction`. * A loop that iterates" LLVM,NVPTX,1436,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return true;` Explanation: The `runOnFunction` method is a member function of the `LowerStructArgs` class, which is a subclass of the `FunctionPass` class. The `runOnFunction` method is called for each function in the program being optimized, and it is responsible for applying the lowering transformation to the function. In this code snippet, the `runOnFunction` method first checks if the function is a kernel function by calling the `isKernelFunction` method. If the function is not a" LLVM,NVPTX,1437,"The next statement after the `assert` statement is the `return` statement. The `assert` statement checks that the size of the `ImageHandleList` is greater than `Idx` and that the string literal is not empty. If the assertion fails, the program will abort with an error message. If the assertion succeeds, the `return` statement will return the `c_str()` value of the `ImageHandleList` element at index `Idx`." LLVM,NVPTX,1438,"The next statement after the `assert` statement is the `return` statement. The `assert` statement checks that the size of the `ImageHandleList` is greater than `Idx` and that the string literal is not empty. If the assertion fails, the program will abort with an error message. If the assertion succeeds, the `return` statement will return the `c_str()` value of the `ImageHandleList` element at index `Idx`." LLVM,NVPTX,1439,The next statement after the `for` loop will be `ImageHandleList.push_back(Symbol)`. LLVM,NVPTX,1440,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `MachineFunctionInfo` class and the `MachineFunction` class. However, based on the name of the class and the constructor, it is likely that the next statement will be an initialization or setup of the `MachineFunctionInfo` object, possibly including the creation of a new instance of the `MachineFunction` class." LLVM,NVPTX,1441,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `MachineFunctionInfo` class and the `MachineFunction` class. However, based on the name of the class and the constructor, it is likely that the next statement will be an initialization or setup of the `MachineFunctionInfo` object, possibly including the creation of a new instance of the `MachineFunction` class." LLVM,NVPTX,1442,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the assembler and the input file being assembled. However, based on the information provided, it is likely that the next statement will be a directive or instruction that defines or uses one of the variables or constants defined in the code snippet, such as `Data8bitsDirective`, `Data16bitsDirective`, `Data32bitsDirective`, `Data64bitsDirective`, `ZeroDirective`, `AsciiDirective`, `AscizDirective`, `SupportsQu" LLVM,NVPTX,1443,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `shouldOmitSectionDirective` method and the input `SectionName`. However, based on the name of the method and the fact that it is declared as `const`, it is likely that the method will return a boolean value indicating whether the section directive with the given name should be omitted or not." LLVM,NVPTX,1444,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `shouldOmitSectionDirective` method and the input `SectionName`. However, based on the name of the method and the fact that it is declared as `const`, it is likely that the method will return a boolean value indicating whether the section directive with the given name should be omitted or not." LLVM,NVPTX,1445,"The next statement of this code snippet is: Data8bitsDirective = ;" LLVM,NVPTX,1446,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be a declaration of a variable or a function, as the code snippet is setting various attributes and options related to the generation of debug information and the layout of data in memory. For example, the `SupportsDebugInformation` attribute is set to `true`, which means that the compiler will generate debug information for the code. The `HasFunctionAlignment` attribute is set to `false`, which means that the compiler will not align functions in memory. The `HasDotTypeDotSizeDirective` attribute is set to `false`, which means that the compiler will" LLVM,NVPTX,1447,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `Triple` class and the values of the variables used in the code. However, based on the information provided, it is likely that the next statement will be a call to the `getArch` method of the `Triple` class, which will return a value of type `Triple::Arch`. This value will be compared to the value of the `Triple::nvptx64` constant, and if they are equal, the `PointerSize` and `Callee" LLVM,NVPTX,1448,"The next statement in the code snippet is: `CalleeSaveStackSlotSize = ;` This statement is assigning a value to the `CalleeSaveStackSlotSize` variable, which is a member of the `MCAsmInfo` class. The value being assigned is ``, which is a placeholder for a numerical literal. The statement is executed if the architecture of the target triple is `nvptx64`." LLVM,NVPTX,1449,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be a definition of a function or a method that uses the attributes and directives defined in the previous statement. For example, it could be a function that takes a string as an argument and returns a pointer to a new string that is the concatenation of the input string and the string ""Hello, world!"". The function would use the `Data8bitsDirective`, `Data16bitsDirective`, `Data32bitsDirective`, and `Data64bitsDirective` directives to specify the size of the string data, and the `As" LLVM,NVPTX,1450,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific values of the variables and the behavior of the functions being called. However, based on the context and the names of the variables, it appears that the code is related to the generation of assembly code for a specific architecture. The next statement is likely to be a call to a function that generates the assembly code for the function being compiled. The function may take the values of the variables as arguments, and it may return the generated assembly code as a string. Here is a possible next statement: `" LLVM,NVPTX,1451,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be a declaration of a variable or a function, as the code snippet appears to be setting up a configuration for a compiler or assembler. The variables declared in the code snippet are likely to be used as parameters for the compiler or assembler. Here is a possible next statement: `CompilerConfiguration config = new CompilerConfiguration();` This statement declares a variable `config` of type `CompilerConfiguration` and initializes it with a new instance of the `CompilerConfiguration` class. The `CompilerConfiguration` class is likely to be a class that represents" LLVM,NVPTX,1452,"The next statement in the code snippet is the definition of the `InlineAsmEnd` variable, which is assigned the value ``." LLVM,NVPTX,1453,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `PointerSize = CalleeSaveStackSlotSize = ;` This statement sets the `PointerSize` and `CalleeSaveStackSlotSize` variables to the value of ``. The value of `` is not specified in the code snippet, so it could be any integer value." LLVM,NVPTX,1454,"The next statement in this code snippet is: Data64bitsDirective = ; This is because the previous statement, `Data32bitsDirective = `, sets the directive for 32-bit data, and the next logical step would be to set the directive for 64-bit data." LLVM,NVPTX,1455,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `Triple` class and the values of the variables used in the code. However, based on the information provided, it is likely that the next statement will be a call to the `getArch` method of the `Triple` class, which will return the architecture of the current triple. The code will then compare the returned architecture to the `Triple::nvptx64` value, and if they are equal, it will set the `PointerSize` and `Callee" LLVM,NVPTX,1456,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be a series of assignments to various properties and attributes of the `InlineAsm` class, based on the syntax and structure of the code snippet. For example, the next statement might be: ``` InlineAsmStart = ``` This would assign the value `` to the `InlineAsmStart` property of the `InlineAsm` class. Similarly, the next statement might be: ``` InlineAsmEnd = ;` This statement assigns the value of `` to both `PointerSize` and `CalleeSaveStackSlotSize`. The value of `` is not specified in the code snippet, so it could be any integer value." LLVM,NVPTX,1458,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `Triple` class and the values of the variables used in the code. However, based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the next statement after the `if` block will be the assignment of a string to the `CommentString` variable." LLVM,NVPTX,1459,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be a declaration of a variable or a function, as the code snippet is part of a larger program and the next statement is likely to be a continuation of the program's logic." LLVM,NVPTX,1460,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `TheTriple` class and the values of the variables used in the code. However, based on the context and the names of the variables, it is likely that the next statement will be a call to a method or function that sets the value of one of the variables in the code snippet, such as `PointerSize`, `CommentString`, `PrivateGlobalPrefix`, `AllowPeriodsInName`, or `HasSetDirective`." LLVM,NVPTX,1461,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the assembler and the platform it is running on. However, based on the information provided, it is likely that the next statement will be a directive or instruction that defines or modifies the behavior of the assembler. Some possible next statements could include: * A directive that defines a new symbol or label, such as `.globl` or `.local`. * A directive that sets the assembler's mode or behavior, such as `.code16` or `.code32" LLVM,NVPTX,1462,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the code depends on various factors such as the input data, the specific implementation of the `MCAsmInfo` class, and the environment in which the code is executed. However, based on the name of the function `anchor`, it is likely that the next statement will be related to the creation or manipulation of an anchor or a reference point in the code. This could involve setting up a pointer or a reference to a specific location in memory, or it could involve creating a new anchor or reference point in the" LLVM,NVPTX,1463,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the code depends on various factors such as the input data, the specific implementation of the `MCAsmInfo` class, and the environment in which the code is executed. However, based on the name of the function `anchor`, it is likely that the next statement will be related to the creation or manipulation of an anchor or a reference point in the code. This could involve setting up a pointer or a reference to a specific location in memory, or it could involve creating a new anchor or reference point in the" LLVM,NVPTX,1464,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the code depends on the specific values of the variables and the implementation of the functions and methods called. However, based on the information provided, it appears that the code is defining a set of directives for a data definition language, with each directive being associated with a specific data type and size. The `HasDotTypeDotSizeDirective` variable appears to be a flag that indicates whether the language supports directives for specifying the size of data types. The `Data8bitsDirective`, `Data16bits" LLVM,NVPTX,1465,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be a `return` statement, as the code is checking the kind of the expression `E` and returning a boolean value indicating whether the kind is `MCExpr::Target`. Therefore, the next statement of this code snippet is likely to be: ``` return E->getKind() == MCExpr::Target; ```" LLVM,NVPTX,1466,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `create` function and the values of the variables `VK__DOUBLE_PREC_FLOAT`, `Flt`, and `Ctx`. However, based on the syntax and the fact that the function is called `create`, it is likely that the next statement will be a call to the `create` function, passing in the values of the variables as arguments." LLVM,NVPTX,1467,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `create` function and the values of the variables `VK__DOUBLE_PREC_FLOAT`, `Flt`, and `Ctx`. However, based on the syntax and the fact that the function is called `create`, it is likely that the next statement will be a call to the `create` function, passing in the values of the variables as arguments." LLVM,NVPTX,1468,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `Res = MCValue::getUnknown();` This is because the `evaluateAsRelocatableImpl` method is called with a `MCValue` object as the first argument, and the `MCValue` class has a `getUnknown` method that returns an unknown value. The `Res` variable is assigned the result of this method call, which is an unknown value." LLVM,NVPTX,1469,"The next statement after `return nullptr;` would be the end of the function, as the `return` statement is the last statement in the function." LLVM,NVPTX,1470,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the `fixELFSymbolsInTLSFixups` function is dependent on the specific implementation of the `MCAssembler` class and the `Asm` object. However, based on the name of the function and the fact that it is being called as an override, it is likely that the function is intended to fix ELF symbols in TLS (Thread-Local Storage) fixups. This could involve updating the symbol table or other metadata to ensure that the TLS fixups are correct and" LLVM,NVPTX,1471,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the `fixELFSymbolsInTLSFixups` function is dependent on the specific implementation of the `MCAssembler` class and the `Asm` object. However, based on the name of the function and the fact that it is being called as an override, it is likely that the function is intended to fix ELF symbols in TLS (Thread-Local Storage) fixups. This could involve updating the symbol table or other metadata to ensure that the TLS fixups are correct and" LLVM,NVPTX,1472,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `Flt` class and the context in which the code is being executed. However, based on the syntax and the fact that the `Flt` class is being returned, it is likely that the next statement will be a call to a method or function that takes an object of type `Flt` as an argument." LLVM,NVPTX,1473,"The next statement of this code snippet is: return Flt;" LLVM,NVPTX,1474,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the `getKind` method depends on the specific implementation of the `Variant` class. However, based on the name of the method and the return type, it is likely that the method returns the kind of variant that is being represented by the `Variant` object." LLVM,NVPTX,1475,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the context in which the code is being executed. However, based on the syntax and the fact that the `Kind` variable is being returned, it is likely that the next statement will be the end of the function or method that this code snippet is a part of." LLVM,NVPTX,1476,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the context in which the code is being executed and the specific implementation of the `SymExpr` class. However, based on the syntax and the fact that the `SymExpr` class is being returned, it is likely that the next statement will be a call to a method or function that takes a `SymExpr` object as an argument. For example, it could be a call to a function that evaluates the expression represented by the `SymExpr` object, or a call to a method that modifies the" LLVM,NVPTX,1477,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the context in which the code is being executed and the specific implementation of the `SymExpr` class. However, based on the syntax and the fact that the `SymExpr` class is being returned, it is likely that the next statement will be a call to a method or function that takes a `SymExpr` object as an argument. For example, it could be a call to a function that evaluates the expression represented by the `SymExpr` object, or a call to a method that modifies the" LLVM,NVPTX,1478,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be the initialization of the member variables `Kind` and `Flt` of the class `FloatMCExpr`. The constructor is taking two arguments: `Kind` of type `VariantKind` and `Flt` of type `APFloat`. The constructor is initializing the member variables `Kind` and `Flt` with the values passed in as arguments. Therefore, the next statement of this code snippet is likely to be the initialization of the member variables `Kind` and `Flt` of the class `FloatMCExpr`." LLVM,NVPTX,1479,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be the initialization of the member variables `Kind` and `Flt` of the class `FloatMCExpr`. The constructor is taking two arguments: `Kind` of type `VariantKind` and `Flt` of type `APFloat`. The constructor is initializing the member variables `Kind` and `Flt` with the values passed in as arguments. Therefore, the next statement of this code snippet is likely to be the initialization of the member variables `Kind` and `Flt` of the class `FloatMCExpr`." LLVM,NVPTX,1480,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `this->SymExpr = _SymExpr;` This statement is assigning the value of `_SymExpr` to the `SymExpr` member variable of the `GenericMCSymbolRefExpr` object." LLVM,NVPTX,1481,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `this->SymExpr = _SymExpr;` This statement is assigning the value of `_SymExpr` to the `SymExpr` member variable of the `GenericMCSymbolRefExpr` object." LLVM,NVPTX,1482,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the `create` method is dependent on the implementation of the `GenericMCSymbolRefExpr` class and the specific inputs provided to the method. However, based on the name of the method and the parameters it takes, it is likely that the `create` method is responsible for creating a new instance of the `GenericMCSymbolRefExpr` class, using the `SymExpr` parameter as the symbol expression and the `Ctx` parameter as the context. Without knowing the specific implementation of" LLVM,NVPTX,1483,"The next statement of this code snippet is: return create ( VK__DOUBLE_PREC_FLOAT , Flt , Ctx ) ;" LLVM,NVPTX,1484,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `create` function and the values of the variables `VK__HALF_PREC_FLOAT`, `Flt`, and `Ctx`. However, based on the syntax and the fact that the function is called `create`, it is likely that the next statement will be a call to the `create` function with the specified arguments." LLVM,NVPTX,1485,"The next statement of this code snippet is: return create ( VK__SINGLE_PREC_FLOAT , Flt , Ctx ) ;" LLVM,NVPTX,1486,"The next statement of this code snippet is: return create ( VK__SINGLE_PREC_FLOAT , Flt , Ctx ) ;" LLVM,NVPTX,1487,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be the initialization of the member variables `Kind` and `Flt` of the `FloatMCExpr` class. The `Kind` variable is being initialized with the value of the `Kind` parameter passed to the constructor, and the `Flt` variable is being initialized with the value of the `Flt` parameter passed to the constructor, after being moved using `std::move`. Therefore, the next statement of this code snippet is likely to be: ``` Kind = Kind; Flt = std::move(Flt);" LLVM,NVPTX,1488,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be the initialization of the member variables `Kind` and `Flt` of the `FloatMCExpr` class. The `Kind` variable is being initialized with the value of the `Kind` parameter passed to the constructor, and the `Flt` variable is being initialized with the value of the `Flt` parameter passed to the constructor, after being moved using `std::move`. Therefore, the next statement of this code snippet is likely to be: ``` Kind = Kind; Flt = std::move(Flt);" LLVM,NVPTX,1489,"The next statement after `return nullptr;` would be the end of the function, as the `return` statement is the last statement in the function." LLVM,NVPTX,1490,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the implementation of the `MCSection` class and the specific use case. However, based on the name of the method and the fact that it is marked as `const`, it is likely that the method returns a pointer to an associated `MCSection` object." LLVM,NVPTX,1491,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return new (Ctx) FloatMCExpr(Kind, Flt);` This statement creates a new instance of the `FloatMCExpr` class, passing in the `Kind` and `Flt` parameters, and returns the newly created object. The `new` operator is used to allocate memory for the object on the heap, and the `Ctx` parameter is used to specify the context in which the object is created." LLVM,NVPTX,1492,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `OS << << * SymExpr << ;` This statement is printing the value of `SymExpr` to the output stream `OS`, using the `<<` operator to concatenate the string literals `` with the value of `SymExpr`." LLVM,NVPTX,1493,"The next statement of this code snippet is: OS << << * SymExpr << ; This statement is a concatenation of three string literals and a symbolic expression. The first and third string literals are empty, and the second string literal is the value of the symbolic expression. The resulting string will be the concatenation of the first and third string literals, followed by the value of the symbolic expression, followed by the third string literal." LLVM,NVPTX,1494,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be the return statement, which returns the result of the `EvaluateAsRelocatableImpl` function. The function is defined as `const` and returns a `bool` value, so it is likely that the next statement will be a `return` statement with a `bool` value." LLVM,NVPTX,1495,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `OS << std::string(NumHex - HexStr.length(), '0');` This statement is a call to the `operator<<` overload for `std::string` that takes a `char` argument. The `std::string` object being inserted into the output stream is constructed by concatenating `NumHex - HexStr.length()` copies of the character `'0'`. The resulting string is then inserted into the output stream." LLVM,NVPTX,1496,"The next statement of this code snippet is: OS << ; This is because the switch statement has a default case that is unreachable, and the only other case that is reachable is the case where Kind is VK__HALF_PREC_FLOAT. In this case, the statement OS << is executed." LLVM,NVPTX,1497,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the context and the specific implementation of the `ISA_LIT` class. However, based on the syntax and the fact that the `ISA_LIT` class is being used to create a new instance of a `FloatMCExpr` object, it is likely that the next statement will be a call to a method or function that takes the `FloatMCExpr` object as an argument and performs some operation on it. Without more information about the context and the specific implementation of the code, it is" LLVM,NVPTX,1498,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the context and the specific implementation of the `ISA_LIT` class. However, based on the syntax and the fact that the `ISA_LIT` class is being used to create a new instance of a `FloatMCExpr` object, it is likely that the next statement will be a call to a method or function that takes the `FloatMCExpr` object as an argument and performs some operation on it. Without more information about the context and the specific implementation of the code, it is" LLVM,NVPTX,1499,"The next statement after the code snippet you provided is: return Create ( VK__DOUBLE_PREC_FLOAT , Flt , Ctx ) ; This statement is a function call to the `Create` function, which is a member of the `VK` class. The function takes three arguments: * `VK__DOUBLE_PREC_FLOAT`: This is a constant value that represents the type of floating-point number to be created. * `Flt" LLVM,NVPTX,1500,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the `Create` function is not specified. However, based on the name of the function and the parameters passed to it, it is likely that the function is creating a new object of some kind, possibly a floating-point number. The `VK_` parameter is likely a vendor-specific identifier for the instruction set architecture (ISA) that the code is being compiled for. The `Flt` parameter is likely a floating-point number, and the `Ctx`" LLVM,NVPTX,1501,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `Res = MCValue(0, 0, 0);` This statement is assigning a new value to the `Res` variable, which is a `MCValue` object. The new value is a `MCValue` object with all its fields set to 0." LLVM,NVPTX,1502,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `MCSection` class and the `FindAssociatedSection` method. However, based on the name of the method, it is likely that it will return a pointer to the associated `MCSection` object." LLVM,NVPTX,1503,"The next statement after `return nullptr;` would be the end of the function, as the `return` statement is the last statement in the function." LLVM,NVPTX,1504,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `Flt = _Flt;` This is a member initializer list, which is used to initialize the member variables of the class. The first member variable being initialized is `Flt`, which is assigned the value of `_Flt`." LLVM,NVPTX,1505,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `Flt = _Flt;` This is a member initializer list, which is used to initialize the member variables of the class. The first member variable being initialized is `Flt`, which is assigned the value of `_Flt`." LLVM,NVPTX,1506,"The next statement of this code snippet is: OS << HexStr;" LLVM,NVPTX,1507,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific values of the variables and the behavior of the `APFloat` and `APInt` classes. However, based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the next statement will be: `OS << ;` This is because the code snippet ends with a `break` statement, which will exit the `switch` block and continue executing the code after the `switch` statement. The next statement after the `switch` statement is `OS << " LLVM,NVPTX,1508,"The next statement of this code snippet is: return new MCInstPrinter(T, SyntaxVariant, MAI, MII, MRI);" LLVM,NVPTX,1509,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be: `return new InstPrinter ( MAI , MII , MRI ) ;` This is because the `if` statement checks if `SyntaxVariant` is equal to ``, and if it is, it returns a new instance of the `InstPrinter` class with the given arguments. If the `if` statement is not true, then the function will not return anything, and the program will continue executing the next statement." LLVM,NVPTX,1510,"The next statement after the code snippet you provided is not deterministic, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `Init` function and the value of the `X` variable. However, based on the code snippet you provided, it is likely that the next statement will be a return statement, as the `Init` function is called with the `X` variable as an argument, and the return value of the `Init` function is assigned to the `X` variable. Therefore, the next statement is likely to be: ``` return X; ```" LLVM,NVPTX,1511,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the program depends on the specific values of the variables and the implementation of the `Init` function. However, based on the syntax and the fact that the `Init` function is being called with two arguments, it is likely that the next statement will be a call to another function or a statement that uses the result of the `Init` function." LLVM,NVPTX,1512,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return new MCSubtargetInfo(TT, CPU, FS);`" LLVM,NVPTX,1513,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return new MCSubtargetInfo(TT, CPU, FS);`" LLVM,NVPTX,1514,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `TargetRegistry` class and the `create` function. However, based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the next statement will be a call to the `RegisterMCAsmInfo` method of the `TargetRegistry` class, passing in a new instance of the `MCAsmInfo` class as an argument. Here is a breakdown of the code snippet: * `RegisterMCAsmInfo < MCAsmInfo > X" LLVM,NVPTX,1515,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `TargetRegistry` class and the `RegisterMCSubtargetInfo`, `RegisterMCInstPrinter`, and `RegisterAsmTargetStreamer` methods. However, based on the names of the methods and the fact that they are all being called on the `TargetRegistry` object, it is likely that the next statement will be a call to one of these methods, passing in the appropriate arguments. Without more information about the specific implementation of the `TargetRegistry` class and the methods being" LLVM,NVPTX,1516,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the program depends on the specific implementation of the `MCRegisterInfo` class and the input data. However, based on the code snippet provided, it is likely that the next statement will be an assignment to a variable or a method call on the `X` object." LLVM,NVPTX,1517,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the program depends on the specific implementation of the `MCRegisterInfo` class and the input data. However, based on the code snippet provided, it is likely that the next statement will be an assignment to a variable or a method call on the `X` object." LLVM,NVPTX,1518,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `TargetRegistry` class and the `RegisterMCInstrInfo` and `RegisterMCRegInfo` methods. However, based on the names of the methods and the fact that they are being called on a `TargetRegistry` object, it is likely that the next statement will be a call to one of these methods, passing in the `ISA_LIT` object as an argument. Here is an example of what the next statement might look like: ``` TargetRegistry::Register" LLVM,NVPTX,1519,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the program depends on the specific implementation of the `MCCodeGenInfo` class and the values of the variables `Reloc`, `CM`, and `OL`. However, based on the code snippet provided, it is likely that the next statement after the call to `initMCCodeGenInfo` will be a statement that uses the `MCCodeGenInfo` object `X` to generate machine code. The `MCCodeGenInfo` class is likely to provide methods for generating machine code, and the `init" LLVM,NVPTX,1520,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `MCCodeGenInfo` class and the values of the input parameters. However, based on the name of the method and the parameters, it is likely that the next statement will be a call to the constructor of the `MCCodeGenInfo` class, which will initialize a new instance of the class with the specified parameters. Here is an example of what the next statement might look like: ``` MCCodeGenInfo *X = new MCCodeGenInfo(TT, RM," LLVM,NVPTX,1521,"The next statement after the `if` statement is the `return` statement. The `return` statement will return the value of the expression `new InstPrinter ( MAI , MII , MRI , STI )` if the condition `SyntaxVariant == ` is true, and it will return the value of the expression `` if the condition is false." LLVM,NVPTX,1522,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return new MCInstPrinter(T, SyntaxVariant, MAI, MII, MRI, STI);` This statement creates a new instance of the `MCInstPrinter` class for the specified instruction set architecture (ISA) and returns a pointer to it. The `create` method is a factory method that creates a new instance of the `MCInstPrinter` class based on the specified parameters. The `ISA_LIT` template parameter is used to specify the instruction set architecture for which" LLVM,NVPTX,1523,"Based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the next statement will be: TargetRegistry::RegisterMCCodeEmitter(*T, createMCCodeEmitter); This is because the code snippet is registering various components of the LLVM target machine with the TargetRegistry, and the MCCodeEmitter is the next component that needs to be registered." LLVM,NVPTX,1524,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `TargetRegistry::RegisterMCAsmInfo(*T, createMCAsmInfo);` This line of code registers the `MCAsmInfo` class for the current target `*T`. The `createMCAsmInfo` function is called to create an instance of the `MCAsmInfo` class, which is then passed to the `RegisterMCAsmInfo` function to register it with the target." LLVM,NVPTX,1525,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `X->InitMCCodeGenInfo(RM, CM, OL);` This statement initializes the `MCCodeGenInfo` object `X` with the specified relocation model `RM`, code model `CM`, and code generation optimization level `OL`." LLVM,NVPTX,1526,"The next statement after the given code snippet is likely to be the return statement, which returns the value of `X` to the caller of the function." LLVM,NVPTX,1527,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `TargetRegistry` class and the `RegisterMCCodeGenInfo`, `RegisterMCInstrInfo`, and `RegisterMCRegInfo` methods. However, based on the names of the methods and the types of the arguments, it is likely that the next statement will be a call to one of these methods, passing in the appropriate arguments. For example, the next statement could be: ``` TargetRegistry::RegisterMCCodeGenInfo(TheTarget3" LLVM,NVPTX,1528,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `TargetRegistry` class and the `RegisterMCCodeGenInfo`, `RegisterMCInstrInfo`, `RegisterMCRegInfo`, and `RegisterMCSubtargetInfo` methods. However, based on the names of these methods and the fact that they are all called on the same `TargetRegistry` object, it is likely that the next statement will be a call to one of these methods, possibly with a different target or a different type of information." LLVM,NVPTX,1529,"The next statement after the code snippet you provided is likely to be the return statement, which is the last statement in the function. The function `InitMCCodeGenInfo` is called with the arguments `RM`, `CM`, and `OL`, and its return value is assigned to the variable `X`. The function is then called again with the same arguments, and its return value is returned from the function. It's difficult to say for certain without more context, but it's possible that the function is being called twice to initialize two different instances of the same class, or to perform some other" LLVM,NVPTX,1530,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return new InstPrinter ( MAI , MII , MRI , STI ) ;` This statement is executed when the `SyntaxVariant` parameter is equal to ``. It creates a new instance of the `InstPrinter` class and returns it as the result of the `create` function." LLVM,NVPTX,1531,"The next statement after the `if` statement will be the `return nullptr` statement. This is because the `if` statement is checking if `SyntaxVariant` is equal to ``, and if it is not, the `return nullptr` statement will be executed." LLVM,NVPTX,1532,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `MCInstrInfo * X = new MCInstrInfo ( ) ;` This statement creates a new instance of the `MCInstrInfo` class and assigns it to the variable `X`." LLVM,NVPTX,1533,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the `create` function is not specified. However, based on the name of the function and the fact that it is declared as a static method of the `MCInstrInfo` class, it is likely that the function creates a new instance of the `MCInstrInfo` class and returns a pointer to it. Therefore, the next statement of this code snippet is likely to be a call to the `create` function, which will create a new instance of the `MCInstrInfo` class and" LLVM,NVPTX,1534,"The next statement after the code snippet you provided is: `return X;` This statement returns the value of `X`, which is a pointer to a `MCRegisterInfo` object, from the function." LLVM,NVPTX,1535,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the program depends on the specific values of the variables and the implementation of the `Init` function. However, based on the syntax and the fact that the `Init` function is being called with two arguments, it is likely that the next statement will be a call to another function or a statement that uses the result of the `Init` function." LLVM,NVPTX,1536,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return new MCSubtargetInfo(TT, CPU, FS);`" LLVM,NVPTX,1537,"Based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the next statement would be: TargetRegistry::RegisterMCAsmInfo(TheTarget32, createMCAsmInfo); This is because the previous statements in the code snippet have registered various components of the target architecture with the TargetRegistry, and the next step would be to register the assembly information for the target architecture. The `RegisterMCAsmInfo` function is used to register the assembly information for a target architecture, and it takes two arguments: the first is a pointer to the" LLVM,NVPTX,1538,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the program depends on the specific values of the variables and the implementation of the functions called. However, we can make some educated guesses based on the information provided: 1. The variable `MF` is a reference to an object of type `MachineFunction`, which is a subclass of `Function`. The `getParent()` method is called on `MBB`, which is an object of type `MachineBasicBlock`. This method returns a pointer to the parent function of `MBB`, which is likely to be" LLVM,NVPTX,1539,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `MRI.removeUse(Prev.getOperand().getReg());`" LLVM,NVPTX,1540,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return true;` Explanation: The code snippet is checking if a certain condition is met, and if it is not, it returns `false`. However, if the condition is met, it returns `true`. The condition being checked is whether the `BaseAddrOp` operand is a register and its register number is equal to ``. If this condition is met, the code snippet returns `true`." LLVM,NVPTX,1541,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `if (MRI.use_empty()) {` This is because the previous `if` statement was not executed, so the control flow continues to the next `if` statement. The `use_empty` method is called on the `MRI` object, which is an instance of a class that has a `use_empty` method. The method takes a string literal as an argument, which is ``. If the method returns `true`, then the control flow will enter the `if" LLVM,NVPTX,1542,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet without knowing the specific implementation of the `MachineInstr` and `MachineBasicBlock` classes, as well as the `getParent()` and `getRegInfo()` methods. However, based on the names of the methods and the context of the code, it is likely that the next statement will involve manipulating the control flow of the machine code, possibly by combining the contents of the current basic block with the contents of another basic block. Without more information, it is not possible to provide a more specific prediction of the next statement." LLVM,NVPTX,1543,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be: `MIB.addReg().add(Prev.getOperand());` This statement adds a register operand to the `MIB` object, which is a `MachineInstrBuilder` object. The register operand is specified by the string literal ``. The `add` method is then called on the `MIB` object, passing in the operand from the `Prev` object, which is a `MachineInstr`" LLVM,NVPTX,1544,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `MI -> eraseFromParentAndMarkDBGValuesForRemoval ( ) ;` This statement is inside the `if` block that checks if `MRI.use_empty()` is true. If it is true, then the code inside the `if` block will be executed, which includes the statement `MI -> eraseFromParentAndMarkDBGValuesForRemoval ( ) ;`." LLVM,NVPTX,1545,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `isCVTAToLocalCombinationCandidate` function and the contents of the `MBB` container. However, based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the next statement will be the body of the `if` statement, which is currently empty. The code snippet is iterating over the elements of the `MBB` container using a `BlockIter` iterator, and for each element, it is checking whether it is a candidate for a local combination using the" LLVM,NVPTX,1546,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `MI->eraseFromParentAndMarkDBGValuesForRemoval();` This statement is inside the `if` block that checks if `MRI.use_empty()` is true. If this condition is true, then the `getUniqueVRegDef` method is called on `MRI` with the argument ``. If this method returns a non-null value, then the `MI` variable is assigned the result of this method call. The next statement is `MI->" LLVM,NVPTX,1547,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the code depends on the specific values of the variables and the objects being referenced. However, based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the next statement will be a comparison of the `Op` variable with a value. The code snippet defines three variables: `MBB`, `MF`, and `Op`. The `MBB` variable is assigned the result of calling the `getParent()` method on the `Root` object, and the `MF` variable is assigned the result of calling the `" LLVM,NVPTX,1548,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `MRI->replaceUsesWithIf(Prev.getOperand().getReg(), MIB.getReg(0), [&](MachineInstr &MI, unsigned OpNum) { return MI.getOperand(OpNum).isReg(); });` This statement is part of a larger code snippet that is implementing a register allocation algorithm for a machine learning model. The code is using the LLVM library to generate machine code for a specific instruction set architecture (ISA). The code snippet" LLVM,NVPTX,1549,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `MRI.use_empty(NRI->getFrameRegister(MF));` This statement is checking if the frame register is empty using the `use_empty` method of the `RegInfo` class, which is a member of the `MachineFunction` class. The `getFrameRegister` method of the `RegisterInfo` class is used to get the frame register, and the `MF` object is passed as an argument to this method. The result of this expression is then passed as an argument to the `use_empty` method" LLVM,NVPTX,1550,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `Changed = true ;`" LLVM,NVPTX,1551,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific inputs and the behavior of the functions being called. However, based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the next statement will be: `MIB.addReg(NRI->getFrameLocalRegister(MF));` This statement adds a register to the `MachineInstrBuilder` object `MIB`, which is being used to build a new machine instruction. The register being added is obtained from the `getFrameLocalRegister` method of the `RegisterInfo` object `NRI" LLVM,NVPTX,1552,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific values of the variables and the behavior of the functions being called. However, based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the next statement will be a call to the `add` method of the `MachineInstrBuilder` object, passing in the result of the `getOperand` method called on the `Root` object. The `getOperand` method is called with the argument ``, which is a constant representing the number of literals in the instruction. The `" LLVM,NVPTX,1553,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `MachineFunctionPass *llvm::createPeephole() { return new Peephole(); }` This statement is a function definition that creates a new instance of the `MachineFunctionPass` class, which is a subclass of the `FunctionPass` class in LLVM. The function is named `createPeephole`, where `ISA_LIT` is a placeholder for a specific instruction set architecture (ISA) name. The" LLVM,NVPTX,1554,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the program depends on the specific implementation of the `Peephole` class and the input data. However, based on the code snippet provided, it is likely that the next statement will be a call to the `Peephole` constructor, which will create a new instance of the `Peephole` class." LLVM,NVPTX,1555,"The next statement of this code snippet is: AU.setPreservesAll();" LLVM,NVPTX,1556,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be a return statement, as the `getPassName()` function is expected to return a string value. The `` placeholder is a hint that the function should return a string literal, but the actual value returned will depend on the specific implementation of the function." LLVM,NVPTX,1557,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be a return statement, as the `getPassName()` function is expected to return a string value. The `` placeholder is a hint that the function should return a string literal, but the actual value returned will depend on the specific implementation of the function." LLVM,NVPTX,1558,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return true;` Explanation: The code snippet is checking if the instruction `GenericAddrDef` is a valid address definition for the virtual register `Op`. If `GenericAddrDef` is not null, and its parent is the same as the current basic block `MBB`, and its opcode is either `` or ``, then the code snippet returns `true`. Otherwise, it returns `false`. The last line of the code snippet is `return true;`, which means" LLVM,NVPTX,1559,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return false;` Explanation: The code snippet is checking if the current instruction is a virtual register definition, and if it is, it checks if the definition is a unique virtual register definition. If the definition is not unique, or if the definition is not a load or store instruction, the function returns false. The `GenericAddrDef` variable is set to the unique virtual register definition if it exists, and the `getParent()` method is used to check if the definition is in the same basic block as the current instruction. The" LLVM,NVPTX,1560,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `skipFunction` and `isCVTAToLocalCombinationCandidate` functions, as well as the contents of the `MF` object. However, based on the context and the names of the functions and variables, it is likely that the next statement will be related to the combination of values in the `MF` object. One possible next statement could be: ``` if (isCVTAToLocalCombinationCandidate(MI)) {" LLVM,NVPTX,1561,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `MFI->setObjectOffset(FrameIdx, Offset);` This is because the `if` statement checks whether `StackGrowsDown` is true, and if it is, it sets the object offset to `-Offset`. Otherwise, it sets the object offset to `Offset`." LLVM,NVPTX,1562,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `Offset += MFI->getLocalFrameSize();` This is because the `for` loop that was previously executing has ended, and the next statement after the loop is the `Offset += MFI->getLocalFrameSize();` statement." LLVM,NVPTX,1563,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `unsigned StackAlign = TFI.getStackAlignment();`" LLVM,NVPTX,1564,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return new PrologEpilogPass ( ) ;` This statement creates a new instance of the `ISA_LIT`PrologEpilogPass class and returns it as the result of the `create` function. The `ISA_LIT` placeholder is a template parameter that is used to specify the target ISA for the pass." LLVM,NVPTX,1565,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be the definition of the `PrologEpilogPass` class, which is a subclass of `MachineFunctionPass`. The `PrologEpilogPass` class is responsible for generating the prolog and epilog code for a function, which includes the code that sets up and tears down the stack frame for the function. Here is an example of what the definition of the `PrologEpilogPass` class might look like: ``` class PrologEpilogPass : public MachineFunctionPass { public: PrologEp" LLVM,NVPTX,1566,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be the definition of the `PrologEpilogPass` class, which is a subclass of `MachineFunctionPass`. The `PrologEpilogPass` class is responsible for generating the prolog and epilog code for a function, which includes the code that sets up and tears down the stack frame for the function. Here is an example of what the definition of the `PrologEpilogPass` class might look like: ``` class PrologEpilogPass : public MachineFunctionPass { public: PrologEp" LLVM,NVPTX,1567,"It's difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `MachineFunction` and `MachineBasicBlock` classes, as well as the contents of the `MF` object. However, based on the names of the methods and variables, it appears that the next statement will be related to processing the instructions in the machine basic block. Here are a few possibilities: * The next statement could be a loop that iterates over the instructions in the machine basic block, processing each one in turn. * The next statement could be a call" LLVM,NVPTX,1568,"The next statement of this code snippet is: LLVM_DEBUG(dbgs() << ""Frame "" << FrameIdx << "": "" << -Offset << "" bytes"");" LLVM,NVPTX,1569,"The next statement of this code snippet is: MFI.setObjectOffset(FrameIdx, Offset); This is because the code snippet is setting the object offset for the current frame index (FrameIdx) to the calculated offset value (Offset). The if-else statement is checking the direction of stack growth (StackGrowsDown) to determine whether to use a positive or negative offset value. If the stack grows down, the offset is negative, otherwise it is positive. The LLVM_DEBUG macro is used to print debug information to the console." LLVM,NVPTX,1570,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `Offset = (Offset + Align - 1) / Align * Align;` This statement is part of the `if` block that starts with `if (MFI.getUseLocalStackAllocationBlock())`. It calculates the offset of the next object in the local frame, taking into account the alignment requirements of the object. The `Align` variable is set to the maximum alignment of the objects in the local frame, and the `Offset` variable is updated to the next aligned offset." LLVM,NVPTX,1571,"The next statement after the `for` loop in the code snippet is `TFI.emitEpilogue(MF, *I)`. The `for` loop iterates over the blocks in the machine function `MF`, and for each block, it checks if it is a return block using the `isReturnBlock()` method. If it is a return block, the code emits the epilogue for that block using the `emitEpilogue()` method of the `TFI` object. Therefore, the next statement after the `for` loop is the `emitE" LLVM,NVPTX,1572,"The next statement after the `for` loop in the code snippet is `TFI.emitEpilogue(MF, *I)`. The `for` loop iterates over the blocks in the machine function `MF`, and for each block, it checks if it is a return block using the `isReturnBlock()` method. If it is a return block, the code emits the epilogue for that block using the `emitEpilogue()` method of the `TFI` object. Therefore, the next statement after the `for` loop is the `emitE" LLVM,NVPTX,1573,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `Offset = (Offset + Align - ) / Align * Align;` This statement is an expression that calculates the offset of the current frame index in the stack frame. It takes into account the alignment of the object and the current offset. The `std::max` function is used to update the `MaxAlign` variable with the maximum alignment of all objects in the stack frame. The `DEBUG` macro is used to print a debug message if the `StackGrowsDown` variable is true." LLVM,NVPTX,1574,The next statement after the `else` block is `Offset += MFI.getObjectSize(FrameIdx);`. LLVM,NVPTX,1575,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `Offset += MFI . getLocalFrameSize ( ) ;` This statement adds the size of the local frame to the `Offset` variable, which represents the offset of the local frame from the stack pointer. The `getLocalFrameSize` method is called on the `MachineFrameInfo` object `MFI` to get the size of the local frame." LLVM,NVPTX,1576,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it appears to be part of a larger program and the context is not provided. However, based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the next statement will be the start of a new loop, possibly a for loop. The code snippet provided is a part of a function that appears to be related to machine code generation. The function is iterating over a list of machine instructions (MBB) and for each instruction, it is checking if it is a debug value and if it is, it is performing some operations on it. If" LLVM,NVPTX,1577,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of the code snippet with certainty because it depends on the specific values of the variables `MaxAlign`, `Alignment`, `Offset`, and `StackGrowsDown`. However, based on the context of the code, it appears that the next statement will be an assignment to `MaxAlign` or `Offset`, possibly using the `std::max` function to determine the maximum value of `MaxAlign` and `Alignment`." LLVM,NVPTX,1578,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific values of the variables and the behavior of the functions being called. However, based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the next statement will be a call to the `getFrameIndexReference` method of the `TFI` object, passing in the `MF` object and the result of the `getOperand` method called on the `MI` object with the argument ``. The return value of this method is then assigned to the `Offset` variable." LLVM,NVPTX,1579,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be the continuation of the `for` loop that iterates over the machine instructions in the current basic block. Specifically, it is likely to be the next iteration of the inner-most `for` loop, which iterates over the operands of the current machine instruction. In this loop, the code checks whether the current operand is a frame index, and if so, it performs some operations on it. The exact operations depend on the specific operand and the context in which the code is being executed. However, some possible operations that could be performed include:" LLVM,NVPTX,1580,"Based on the code snippet you provided, it appears to be a part of a function that is modifying the operands of a machine instruction. The function is iterating over the operands of a machine instruction and checking if they are frame indices. If they are, the function is modifying the operands to use a register instead of a frame index and setting some additional metadata. The next statement of the code snippet is likely to be the continuation of the loop over the operands of the machine instruction. It is possible that the function will continue to modify the operands of the machine instruction or it may end the loop and" LLVM,NVPTX,1581,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be the continuation of the `for` loop, specifically the next iteration of the inner-most loop. The code is iterating over the operands of a `MachineInstr` object, and for each operand, it is checking if it is a frame index reference. If it is, it is getting the frame index reference, register, and offset using `getFrameIndexReference`, and then changing the operand to a register operand using `ChangeToRegister`. It is also setting the operand as debug and adding a debug expression to it using `" LLVM,NVPTX,1582,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty because it is dependent on the specific values of the variables and the implementation of the functions being called. However, based on the context and the code snippet provided, it appears that the next statement will be a loop that iterates over the operands of the machine instruction `MI` and checks if they are frame indices (FI). If an operand is a frame index, the loop will calculate the offset of the frame object for that operand and store it in the `Modified` variable." LLVM,NVPTX,1583,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be: `TRI->eliminateFrameIndex(MI, , i, nullptr);` This is because the code is iterating over the operands of a `MachineInstr` object, and for each operand that is not a frame index, it is calling the `eliminateFrameIndex` method on the `TargetRegisterInfo` object to eliminate the frame index. The `eliminateFrameIndex` method is likely to modify the `MachineInstr` object in some way, which is why the `" LLVM,NVPTX,1584,"The next statement after the `for` loop in the code snippet is: `TFI.emitEpilogue(MF, *I);` This statement is inside the `if` block, which means that it will only be executed if the condition `!I->empty() && I->back().isReturn()` is true. The `TFI.emitEpilogue()` method is called with the `MF` and `*I` arguments, which are the machine function and the current basic block, respectively." LLVM,NVPTX,1585,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `TFI.emitPrologue(MF);` Explanation: The code snippet is a part of a function named `runOnMachineFunction` that is a member of a class named `PrologEpilogPass`. The function takes a `MachineFunction` object as an argument and performs some operations on it. The code snippet starts by declaring some local variables: * `Modified`: a boolean variable that is initialized to `false`. * `STI`: a reference to a `TargetSubtargetInfo`" LLVM,NVPTX,1586,"Based on the code snippet you provided, it is difficult to predict the next statement with certainty. However, based on the context and the patterns in the code, it is likely that the next statement will be related to the processing of the operands of the machine instruction. The code is iterating over the operands of a machine instruction (MI) and performing some operation on each operand. The variable ""i"" is used as a loop counter to iterate over the operands, and the variable ""e"" is used to store the number of operands. The variable ""Modified"" is also used to keep" LLVM,NVPTX,1587,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `Offset = std::max(Offset, (int64_t)MFI.getLocalStackAllocationBlockSize());` This statement is calculating the maximum offset of the local stack allocation block, which is the maximum offset of the stack frame that is used for local variables and temporary objects. The `std::max` function is used to ensure that the offset is not negative, as the stack grows downwards on some architectures. The `MFI.getLocalStackAllocationBlockSize()` method is used to get the size of the local stack" LLVM,NVPTX,1588,"Based on the code snippet provided, it appears to be a loop that iterates over the operands of a machine instruction (MI) and performs some operations on them. The loop starts at the index and ends at the index -1. Within the loop, the code checks if the current operand is a frame index reference (isFI()) and if it is, it asserts that the current index is equal to and the string literals and are equal." LLVM,NVPTX,1589,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `Offset += MFI.getLocalFrameSize();` This statement adds the size of the local frame to the `Offset` variable, which represents the current offset of the stack frame. The `getLocalFrameSize()` method returns the size of the local frame, which is the sum of the sizes of all objects in the local frame. The purpose of this statement is to update the `Offset` variable to reflect the new offset of the stack frame after the local frame has been allocated. This updated offset will be used to calculate the offset of subsequent objects in" LLVM,NVPTX,1590,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `Ops.push_back(Offset);` This is because the code is currently iterating over the operands of a machine instruction (represented by the `MachineInstr` object `MI`) and processing each operand. The current operand being processed is represented by the `MachineOperand` object `Op`, and the code is checking whether the operand is a debug operand (i.e., whether `MI.isDebugOperand(&Op)` returns `true`). If the operand is a debug operand, the code retr" LLVM,NVPTX,1591,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `int64_t StackSize = Offset - LocalAreaOffset;` This statement calculates the size of the stack frame by subtracting the offset of the local area from the offset of the stack frame. The result is stored in the `StackSize` variable." LLVM,NVPTX,1592,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the program depends on the specific implementation of the `ProxyRegErasure` class and the input data. However, based on the name of the class and the method being called, it is likely that the next statement will be related to the creation and initialization of a new instance of the `ProxyRegErasure` class." LLVM,NVPTX,1593,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return new ProxyRegErasure();` This statement creates a new instance of the `ProxyRegErasure` class and returns it as the result of the `create` function. The `ProxyRegErasure` class is a subclass of `MachineFunctionPass` and is used to erase proxy registers in the LLVM IR." LLVM,NVPTX,1594,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be a return statement, as the `getPassName()` function is expected to return a string value. The `` placeholder is a hint that the function should return a string literal, but the actual value returned will depend on the specific implementation of the function." LLVM,NVPTX,1595,The next statement after `return ;` would be the end of the function. LLVM,NVPTX,1596,"The next statement after the code snippet you provided is likely to be a call to the `initialize` function for the `ISA_LIT` proxy pass, which is a pass that is used to erase the `ProxyReg` pass from the pass pipeline. Here is an example of what the next statement might look like: ``` initializeProxyRegErasurePass ( * PassRegistry :: getPassRegistry ( ) ) ; ``` This statement initializes the `ISA_LIT` proxy pass, which is a pass that is used to erase the `" LLVM,NVPTX,1597,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `for (auto & BB : MF) {` This line begins a loop that iterates over the basic blocks in the machine function `MF`. The loop variable `BB` is a reference to each basic block in turn, and the loop body will execute for each basic block in the function." LLVM,NVPTX,1598,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be: `if (Op == From) {` This is because the code is iterating over the uses of the `Instr` object, and the `Op` variable is being used to represent the current use. The `if` statement checks whether the current use is equal to the `From` operand, which is passed as an argument to the `replaceRegisterUsage` function. If the current use is equal to `From`, then the code inside the `if` block will be executed." LLVM,NVPTX,1599,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `replaceRegisterUsage` method and the input parameters. However, based on the name of the method and the parameters, it is likely that the next statement will involve replacing the register usage in the `Instr` instruction with the `To` operand, possibly using the `From` operand as a reference or guide. Here are a few possibilities for what the next statement could be: 1. `Instr.replaceOperand(From, To);` 2. `In" LLVM,NVPTX,1600,"Based on the code snippet you provided, it is not possible to predict the next statement with certainty. The code is using a `switch` statement to check the value of `MI.getOpcode()`, and the next statement will depend on the value of that function. However, based on the `` cases in the `switch` statement, it is likely that the next statement will be a block of code that is executed when the value of `MI.getOpcode()` matches one of the `` cases. The exact behavior of the next statement will depend on the specific" LLVM,NVPTX,1601,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific inputs and the behavior of the `replaceMachineInstructionUsage` function. However, based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the next statement after the `break` statement will be the closing brace of the `switch` statement, which would indicate the end of the `switch` block. Therefore, the next statement after the `break` statement is likely to be the closing brace of the `switch` statement, which would indicate the end of the `switch` block." LLVM,NVPTX,1602,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the implementation of the `getStrPool` and `getManagedString` functions, as well as the contents of the `O` object. However, based on the syntax and the fact that the code is using the `c_str` function, it is likely that the next statement will be a call to the `c_str` function on the result of the `getManagedString` function, which is being passed the result of the `str` function on the `O` object. Therefore" LLVM,NVPTX,1603,"The next statement after the code snippet you provided is likely to be a closing curly brace `}` to end the function or method that contains the code snippet. The code snippet you provided is a return statement that is casting the address of a `ManagedStringPool` object to a `const` pointer to a `ManagedStringPool`. The `const_cast` operator is used to remove the `const` qualifier from the pointer, which allows the function or method to return a non-const pointer to the `ManagedStringPool` object. Without seeing the rest of the code, it's" LLVM,NVPTX,1604,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific values of the variables and the implementation of the `getFrameInfo`, `getObjectOffset`, `getOperand`, and `getImm` methods. However, based on the names of the methods and the context of the code, it is likely that the next statement will be related to accessing or manipulating the object at the offset specified by `Offset`. The `` placeholder suggests that the code is expecting a literal value to be passed as an argument to the `getOperand" LLVM,NVPTX,1605,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty because the behavior of the code depends on the value of the `RC` variable, which is not specified in the code snippet. However, based on the structure of the code, it appears that the `RC` variable is being compared to a series of string literals using the `==` operator. If the value of `RC` matches one of the string literals, the function will return a string literal. If the value of `RC` does not match any of the string literals, the function will return a default value." LLVM,NVPTX,1606,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty because the behavior of the code depends on the value of the `RC` variable, which is not specified in the code snippet. However, based on the structure of the code, it appears that the `RC` variable is being compared to a series of string literals using the `==` operator. If the value of `RC` matches one of the string literals, the corresponding string literal will be returned. If none of the string literals match, the final `else` block will be executed, which does not have a `" LLVM,NVPTX,1607,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific values of the variables and the behavior of the program. However, based on the syntax and structure of the code, it appears to be a function that takes a string literal as input and returns a string literal based on the value of the input. The function appears to be checking the value of the input string against a series of string literals, and returning a specific string literal if the input matches one of the literals. The function is using the address-of operator (&) to compare the address of" LLVM,NVPTX,1608,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the value of the variable `RC` and the contents of the string literals. However, based on the syntax and the fact that the code is using the `return` statement, it is likely that the code is intended to return a string value based on the value of `RC`. The string literals in the code snippet are likely to be the possible return values, and the code is checking the value of `RC` to determine which string literal to return. Without more information about the context in" LLVM,NVPTX,1609,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return ;` This is because the `if` statements are all checking the value of `RC`, and if it matches any of the conditions, the corresponding `return` statement will be executed. If none of the conditions are met, the final `return` statement will be executed." LLVM,NVPTX,1610,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return MF.getFrameRegister();`" LLVM,NVPTX,1611,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return CalleeSavedRegClasses;` This is because the `getCalleeSavedRegClasses` method is returning the `CalleeSavedRegClasses` array, which is a static array of `TargetRegisterClass` pointers. The `return` statement is used to return the value of the `CalleeSavedRegClasses` array to the caller of the `getCalleeSavedRegClasses` method." LLVM,NVPTX,1612,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return CalleeSavedRegClasses;` This is because the `getCalleeSavedRegClasses` method is returning the `CalleeSavedRegClasses` array, which is a static array of `TargetRegisterClass` pointers. The `return` statement is used to return the value of the `CalleeSavedRegClasses` array to the caller of the `getCalleeSavedRegClasses` method." LLVM,NVPTX,1613,"The next statement of this code snippet is: return CalleeSavedRegs;" LLVM,NVPTX,1614,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return CalleeSavedRegs;` This statement returns the `CalleeSavedRegs` array, which is a constant array of `uint16_t` values. The array is initialized with the values specified in the `` placeholder." LLVM,NVPTX,1615,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific values of the variables and the implementation of the `getDwarfRegNum` function. However, based on the name of the function and the parameters it takes, it is likely that the next statement will be a return statement that returns the DWARF register number for the specified register number and exception handling mode." LLVM,NVPTX,1616,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific values of the variables and the implementation of the `getDwarfRegNum` function. However, based on the name of the function and the parameters it takes, it is likely that the next statement will be a return statement that returns the DWARF register number for the specified register number and exception handling mode." LLVM,NVPTX,1617,"Based on the code snippet you provided, it appears that the `getRegClassName` function is trying to return a string that represents the name of a register class. The function takes a `TargetRegisterClass` object as an argument, and it uses a series of `if` statements to check which register class the object represents. If the `TargetRegisterClass` object is equal to a specific register class, the function returns a string that represents the name of that register class. If the object is not equal to any of the specific register classes, the function returns an empty string." LLVM,NVPTX,1618,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `RegisterInfo` class and the value of the `ISA_LIT` constant. However, based on the name of the function and the return type, it is likely that the next statement will be a return statement that returns the value of the RISC-V register `RA`." LLVM,NVPTX,1619,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `RegisterInfo :: RegisterInfo ( const TargetInstrInfo & tii , const Subtarget & st ) : GenRegisterInfo ( ) , Is64Bit ( st . is64Bit ( ) ) {` This is a constructor for the `RegisterInfo` class, which is a subclass of `GenRegisterInfo`. The constructor takes two arguments: `tii`, which is an" LLVM,NVPTX,1620,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `RegisterInfo :: RegisterInfo ( const TargetInstrInfo & tii , const Subtarget & st ) : GenRegisterInfo ( ) , Is64Bit ( st . is64Bit ( ) ) {` This is a constructor for the `RegisterInfo` class, which is a subclass of `GenRegisterInfo`. The constructor takes two arguments: `tii`, which is an" LLVM,NVPTX,1621,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific values of the variables and the behavior of the functions being called. However, based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the next statement will be a call to the `ChangeToRegister` method of the `Operand` class, passing in the string literal """" and the boolean value `false`. The method will then modify the operand to use the specified register and offset." LLVM,NVPTX,1622,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet without knowing the specific implementation of the `TargetRegisterClass` and `MachineFunction` classes, as well as the context in which this code is being executed. However, based on the names of the classes and methods involved, it is likely that the next statement will be related to the handling of function calls and the management of registers. The `getCalleeSavedRegClasses` method is likely to return a list of register classes that are used to store callee-saved registers, which are registers that are preserved across function calls. Without" LLVM,NVPTX,1623,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the function `getDwarfRegNum` is dependent on the specific implementation of the function and the input parameters `RegNum` and `isEH`. However, based on the name of the function and the parameters, it is likely that the function is used to retrieve the register number of a dwarf register, which is a type of register used in the DWARF debugging format. The `RegNum` parameter is likely to be the register number of the dwarf register, and the" LLVM,NVPTX,1624,"Based on the code snippet you provided, it appears to be a function that takes a `TargetRegisterClass` object as an argument and returns a string representing the name of the register class. The function uses a series of `if` statements to check the value of `RC` and return a different string based on its value. The next statement of the code snippet would be the first `if` statement, which checks if `RC` is equal to `& `. If this condition is true, the function returns the string ``. If the condition is false, the function" LLVM,NVPTX,1625,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty because the behavior of the code depends on the value of the `RC` variable, which is not specified in the code snippet. However, based on the structure of the code, it appears that the `RC` variable is being compared to a series of string literals using the `==` operator. If the value of `RC` matches one of the string literals, the corresponding string literal will be returned. If the value of `RC` does not match any of the string literals, the `else` block will be executed" LLVM,NVPTX,1626,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty because the behavior of the code depends on the value of the `RC` variable, which is not specified in the code snippet. However, based on the structure of the code, it appears that the `RC` variable is being compared to a series of string literals using the `==` operator. If the value of `RC` matches one of the string literals, the corresponding statement will be executed. Therefore, the next statement of this code snippet could be any of the following, depending on the value of `RC" LLVM,NVPTX,1627,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty because the behavior of the code depends on the values of the variables `ISA_LIT`, `STR_LIT`, and `RC`, which are not provided. However, based on the code snippet, it appears that the function `getRegClassStr` is intended to return a string representation of a register class for a specific instruction set architecture (ISA). The function takes a `TargetRegisterClass` object as an argument, and it uses a series of `if` statements to check the" LLVM,NVPTX,1628,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific values of the variables and the implementation of the `getFrameInfo` and `getOperand` methods. However, based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the next statement will be a call to the `getImm` method of the object returned by the `getOperand` method, with the argument being the result of the addition of the `getObjectOffset` method of the `getFrameInfo` method and the `FIOperandNum` variable, plus a literal value." LLVM,NVPTX,1629,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific values of the variables and the behavior of the functions being called. However, based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the next statement will be a call to the `ChangeToImmediate` method of the `Operand` class, passing in the `Offset` variable as an argument. The `ChangeToImmediate` method is used to change the operand to an immediate value, which is a value that is stored directly in the instruction rather than being loaded from memory. In this case, the" LLVM,NVPTX,1630,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be the return statement, which returns the `CalleeSavedRegs` array. The `getCalleeSavedRegs` function is declared as a `const` member function of the `RegisterInfo` class, which means it does not modify any member variables of the class. The function takes a `const MachineFunction*` parameter, which is likely to be a pointer to a `MachineFunction` object that represents the current machine function being generated. The function returns a `const MCPhysReg*` pointer to the `CalleeSavedRegs`" LLVM,NVPTX,1631,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the `getFrameRegister` method depends on the specific implementation of the `RegisterInfo` class and the `MachineFunction` class. However, based on the name of the method and the fact that it is a member function of the `RegisterInfo` class, it is likely that the method returns a register that is used as a frame pointer in the machine function. The `MachineFunction` class is a part of the LLVM compiler infrastructure and represents a function in the machine code level. The `RegisterInfo" LLVM,NVPTX,1632,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be a return statement, as the function `getFrameRegister` is expected to return a value of type `unsigned RegisterInfo`. The return value is determined by the expression ``, which is a string literal that represents a register name. The exact value of the return statement will depend on the specific register name and the target architecture. Without more context, it is not possible to determine the exact value of the return statement. However, based on the function name and the fact that it is returning a register" LLVM,NVPTX,1633,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the code depends on the value of the `RC` variable and the contents of the `` placeholders, which are not provided in the code snippet. However, based on the structure of the code, it appears that the `RC` variable is being compared to a series of string literals, and the function is returning a string literal based on the value of `RC`. The `else if` statements suggest that there may be multiple possible return values depending on the value of `RC`." LLVM,NVPTX,1634,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return ;` This is because the `if` statements are evaluated in order, and the first `if` statement that evaluates to `true` will cause the corresponding `return` statement to be executed. If none of the `if` statements evaluate to `true`, the `else` statement will be executed, which also returns a string literal." LLVM,NVPTX,1635,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `RegisterInfo :: RegisterInfo ( const Subtarget & st ) : GenRegisterInfo ( ) , Is64Bit ( st . is64Bit ( ) ) {` This is a constructor for the `RegisterInfo` class, which takes a `const Subtarget&` reference as an argument. The constructor initializes the `Is64Bit` member variable to the value returned by" LLVM,NVPTX,1636,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `RegisterInfo :: RegisterInfo ( const Subtarget & st ) : GenRegisterInfo ( ) , Is64Bit ( st . is64Bit ( ) ) {` This is a constructor for the `RegisterInfo` class, which takes a `const Subtarget&` reference as an argument. The constructor initializes the `Is64Bit` member variable to the value returned by" LLVM,NVPTX,1637,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return CalleeSavedRegClasses;` This is because the `getCalleeSavedRegClasses` function is defined to return a pointer to an array of `TargetRegisterClass` objects, and the `CalleeSavedRegClasses` array is the only array of `TargetRegisterClass` objects that is defined in the code snippet. Therefore, the function must return a pointer to this array in order to fulfill its contract." LLVM,NVPTX,1638,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return;` Explanation: The `eliminateCallFramePseudoInstr` function is a member function of the `MachineFunction` class, and it takes three arguments: a reference to a `MachineFunction` object, a reference to a `MachineBasicBlock` object, and an iterator to a position in the `MachineBasicBlock`. The function first erases the instruction at the position pointed to by the iterator `I` using the `erase` method of the `MachineBasicBlock` class. Then" LLVM,NVPTX,1639,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be: `MI.getOperand(i).ChangeToRegister(, false);` This is because the previous statement, `MI.getOperand(i+).ChangeToImmediate(Offset);`, has already changed the operand at index `i+` to an immediate value, so the next statement is likely to be changing the operand at index `i` to a register value." LLVM,NVPTX,1640,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be: `RS->eliminateFI(MI, FrameIndex, Offset);` This is because the code is setting up the parameters for the `eliminateFI` method of the `RegScavenger` class, which is used to eliminate a frame index from a machine instruction. The `eliminateFI` method is called with the machine instruction `MI`, the frame index `FrameIndex`, and the offset `Offset` as arguments." LLVM,NVPTX,1641,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it appears to be a fragment of a larger program and the context is not provided. However, based on the syntax and structure of the code, it appears to be a series of if statements that check the value returned by the `getID()` method of an object called `RC`. If the value matches a specific string literal, the method returns a reference to that string literal. Without more information, it is not possible to determine the exact value of the string literals or the specific logic being implemented in this code snippet." LLVM,NVPTX,1642,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it appears to be a part of a larger program and the context is not provided. However, based on the syntax and structure of the code, it appears to be a series of if statements that check the value returned by the `getID()` method of an object called `RC`. If the value is equal to a specific string literal, the code returns the result of a function called `getRegClassName()` with a specific string literal as an argument. It is possible that the code is checking the type" LLVM,NVPTX,1643,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it appears to be a part of a larger program and the context is not provided. However, based on the syntax and structure of the code, it appears to be a series of if statements that check the value returned by the `getID()` method of an object called `RC`. If the value is equal to a specific string literal, the code returns the result of a function called `getRegClassName()` with a specific string literal as an argument. It is possible that the code is checking the type" LLVM,NVPTX,1644,"Based on the code snippet you provided, it appears that the `RC` variable is being compared to a series of string literals using the `==` operator. If the comparison is true, the function returns the string literal. Therefore, the next statement of this code snippet would be: ``` else if (RC == &"""") { return """"; } ``` This statement checks if the `RC` variable is equal to the address of the string literal `""""`. If it is, the function returns the string literal `""" LLVM,NVPTX,1645,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the code depends on the value of the `RC` variable, which is not specified in the code snippet. However, based on the structure of the code, it appears that the `RC` variable is being compared to a series of string literals using the `==` operator. If the value of `RC` matches one of the string literals, the corresponding `return` statement will be executed. If the value of `RC` does not match any of the string literals, the final `else`" LLVM,NVPTX,1646,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific values of the variables and the behavior of the `RC` object. However, based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the `if` statements are checking the value of `RC->getID()` against a series of string literals, and returning a different number literal for each matching case. If the value of `RC->getID()` matches the first string literal, the code will return the number literal `1`. If the value of `RC->getID()` matches the second string literal," LLVM,NVPTX,1647,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific values of the variables and the implementation of the `RC` class. However, based on the code provided, it appears that the `getID()` method is being called on the `RC` object, and the return value is being compared to a string literal. If the return value matches the string literal, the method returns `true`. Therefore, the next statement of this code snippet could be any of the following: * `return true;` * `return false;` * `return <" LLVM,NVPTX,1648,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty because the behavior of the code depends on the value of the `RC` variable, which is not specified in the code snippet. However, based on the structure of the code, it appears that the `RC` variable is being compared to several different string literals, and the function is returning a different string literal depending on which comparison evaluates to true. Therefore, the next statement of the code snippet is likely to be another `if` statement that compares `RC` to a different string literal, or it could be" LLVM,NVPTX,1649,"This code snippet is a part of a function named `eliminateFrameIndex` that is a member of a class named `RegisterInfo`. The function takes several parameters, including `II`, `SPAdj`, `FIOperandNum`, and `RS`, and performs some operations on the `MachineInstr` object `MI` and the `MachineFunction` object `MF`. The first line of the code snippet is an assertion statement that checks whether the value of `SPAdj` is equal to `` and whether the string literal `` is non-" LLVM,NVPTX,1650,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet without knowing the specific implementation of the `getCalleeSavedRegs` method and the `MachineFunction` class. However, based on the name of the method and the class, it is likely that the next statement will return a list of registers that are saved by the callee (i.e., the function being called) before it returns. In general, the `getCalleeSavedRegs` method is used to retrieve the registers that are saved by the callee before it returns, so that the caller can restore them when" LLVM,NVPTX,1651,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet without knowing the context and the purpose of the code. However, based on the syntax and the variables used, it appears that the code is trying to cast the result of `MF.getTarget()` to a `const TargetMachine &` type. The `static_cast` operator is used to perform a compile-time cast, which means that the cast is performed at compile-time and not at runtime. The result of the cast is a reference to a `const TargetMachine`" LLVM,NVPTX,1652,"The code snippet is casting the result of `MF.getTarget()` to a `const TargetMachine&` and assigning it to a variable named `TM`. It then checks if `TM` is a 64-bit machine by calling the `is64Bit()` method on `TM`. If `TM` is a 64-bit machine, the code returns a string literal, otherwise it returns another string literal. Therefore, the next statement of this code snippet would be the call to `is64Bit()` on `TM`." LLVM,NVPTX,1653,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet without knowing the context and the purpose of the code. However, based on the syntax and the variables used, it appears that the code is trying to cast the result of `MF.getTarget()` to a `const TargetMachine &` type. The `static_cast` operator is used to perform a compile-time cast, which means that the cast is performed at compile-time and not at runtime. The result of the cast is a reference to a `const TargetMachine`" LLVM,NVPTX,1654,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return TM.is64Bit() ? : ;` This statement is a ternary operator that checks if the target machine is 64-bit. If it is, the first string literal is returned, otherwise the second string literal is returned." LLVM,NVPTX,1655,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty because the behavior of the code depends on the value of the `RC` variable, which is not specified in the code snippet. However, based on the syntax and structure of the code, it appears that the code is checking the value of `RC` against a series of string literals, and returning a string literal if the value of `RC` matches one of the literals. The string literals are all different, so it is not possible to determine which one will be returned based on the information provided. It is also" LLVM,NVPTX,1656,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the values of the variables and the specific implementation of the function. However, based on the syntax and the fact that the function appears to be returning a string literal, it is likely that the next statement will be a return statement returning a string literal." LLVM,NVPTX,1657,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty because the behavior of the code depends on the value of the `RC` variable, which is not specified in the code snippet. However, based on the syntax and structure of the code, it appears that the code is checking the value of `RC` against a series of string literals, and returning a string literal if the value of `RC` matches one of the literals. The string literals are all different, so it is not possible to determine which one will be returned based on the information provided. It is also" LLVM,NVPTX,1658,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be the initialization of the `RegisterInfo` object with the `GenRegisterInfo` constructor, passing in the `NUM_LIT` value as an argument. Here's a breakdown of the code snippet: * `ISA_LIT` is a macro that expands to a string literal representing the name of the instruction set architecture (ISA) being targeted. * `RegisterInfo` is a class that represents information about a register in the ISA. * `RegisterInfo ( )` is the constructor for the `Register" LLVM,NVPTX,1659,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be the initialization of the `RegisterInfo` object with the `GenRegisterInfo` constructor, passing in the `NUM_LIT` value as an argument. Here's a breakdown of the code snippet: * `ISA_LIT` is a macro that expands to a string literal representing the name of the instruction set architecture (ISA) being targeted. * `RegisterInfo` is a class that represents information about a register in the ISA. * `RegisterInfo ( )` is the constructor for the `Register" LLVM,NVPTX,1660,"return ""MyPass"";" LLVM,NVPTX,1661,"Based on the code snippet you provided, it appears to be a part of a switch statement. The next statement in the switch statement would be the next case label. In this case, the next case label is ""case :""." LLVM,NVPTX,1662,"The next statement in the code snippet is: `InstrsToRemove.insert(&TexHandleDef);`" LLVM,NVPTX,1663,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `if ( MCID . TSFlags & ) {` This is a conditional statement that checks if the `TSFlags` field of the `MCInstrDesc` object `MCID` has a specific bit set. If the bit is set, the code inside the `if` block will be executed." LLVM,NVPTX,1664,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific values of the string literals and the return values of the functions. However, based on the syntax and structure of the code, it appears that the next statement will be another case statement, possibly with a similar structure to the previous case statements. It's also worth noting that the code snippet is using a switch statement with string literals as the cases, which is not a common or recommended practice in most programming languages. It's possible that the code is using a custom or third-party library that" LLVM,NVPTX,1665,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `Op.ChangeToImmediate(Idx);`" LLVM,NVPTX,1666,"The next statement after the given code snippet is: `InstrsToRemove.clear();` This statement clears the `InstrsToRemove` vector, which is a vector of `MachineInstr` pointers. The `clear()` method is called on the vector to remove all the elements from it, effectively emptying the vector." LLVM,NVPTX,1667,"The next statement after the `for` loop would be the `return` statement. The `for` loop is iterating over the instructions in the machine function, and the `processInstr` function is being called on each instruction. The `InstrsToRemove` vector is being populated with instructions that need to be removed. After the `for` loop, the instructions in the `InstrsToRemove` vector are being removed from their parent basic block. Finally, the function returns a boolean value indicating whether any instructions were removed." LLVM,NVPTX,1668,"Based on the code snippet you provided, it appears that the next statement will be: `StringRef ParamName = Sym.substr(ParamBaseName.size());` This statement is creating a new `StringRef` object called `ParamName` by taking a substring of the `Sym` object starting from the size of the `ParamBaseName` string. The substring will contain the name of the parameter that is being referenced in the texture handle definition." LLVM,NVPTX,1669,"The next statement in the code snippet is: `InstrsToRemove.insert(&TexHandleDef);`" LLVM,NVPTX,1670,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the implementation of the `getPassName` method in the derived class. However, based on the syntax and the fact that the method is marked as `const`, it is likely that the next statement will be a return statement that returns a string representing the name of the pass." LLVM,NVPTX,1671,"The next statement after the `for` loop would be the `clear()` method of the `InstrsToRemove` object, which would clear the set of instructions to be removed. Here's the complete code snippet with the next statement added: ``` InstrsToRemove . clear ( ) ; for ( MachineBasicBlock & MBB : MF ) for ( MachineInstr & MI : MBB ) Changed |= processInstr ( MI ) ; InstrsToRemove . clear ( ) ; ``` Note that the `clear()`" LLVM,NVPTX,1672,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the `ReplaceImageHandles` class is not specified. However, based on the name of the class and the fact that it is being instantiated and returned, it is likely that the next statement will involve the use of the `ReplaceImageHandles` object to replace image handles in some way." LLVM,NVPTX,1673,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `MachineFunctionPass *llvm::createReplaceImageHandlesPass() { return new ReplaceImageHandles(); }` This statement creates a new instance of the `MachineFunctionPass` class and returns it. The `create` method is a factory method that creates a new instance of the `MachineFunctionPass` class, and the `new` operator is used to allocate memory for the new instance. The `ISA_LIT` template parameter is used to specify the instruction set architecture (" LLVM,NVPTX,1674,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific input and the behavior of the functions called within the snippet. However, based on the code provided, it appears that the snippet is searching for a specific symbol or global value in the input, and if found, it will remove the corresponding instruction and return the index of the symbol or global value. The snippet first retrieves the register information and machine function information for the input. It then retrieves the definition of the texture handle and checks its opcode. If the opcode is a specific value, it means that" LLVM,NVPTX,1675,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return ""getPassName"";` This is because the `getPassName` function is declared as a virtual function, which means that it can be overridden by a derived class. The `` placeholder is used to indicate that the function returns a string literal, which is a constant string that is stored in the program's memory. The `return` statement is used to return the string literal, which in this case is the string ""getPassName""." LLVM,NVPTX,1676,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the program depends on the specific implementation of the `getPassName` method and the state of the object. However, based on the name of the method and the fact that it is declared as `const`, it is likely that the method returns a string that represents the name of the pass. The `const` keyword indicates that the method does not modify the state of the object, so it is possible that the method returns a constant string or a string that is stored in the object. Without more information" LLVM,NVPTX,1677,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `ISA_LIT`ReplaceImageHandles`::`ISA_LIT`ReplaceImageHandles`( ) : MachineFunctionPass ( ID ) { This is a constructor for the `ReplaceImageHandles` class, which is a subclass of `MachineFunctionPass`. The constructor takes no arguments and initializes the `ID` field of the `MachineFunctionPass` class to the value of the `ID` field of the `ReplaceImageHandles` class." LLVM,NVPTX,1678,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `ISA_LIT`ReplaceImageHandles`::`ISA_LIT`ReplaceImageHandles`( ) : MachineFunctionPass ( ID ) { This is a constructor for the `ReplaceImageHandles` class, which is a subclass of `MachineFunctionPass`. The constructor takes no arguments and initializes the `ID` field of the `MachineFunctionPass` class to the value of the `ID` field of the `ReplaceImageHandles` class." LLVM,NVPTX,1679,"Based on the code snippet you provided, it appears that the `ReplaceImageHandles` function is part of a larger program that is processing instructions in a machine code. The function is checking the flags of the current instruction (represented by the `MCID` variable) to determine if it needs to replace any image handles. The first `if` statement checks if the `TSFlags` field of the instruction description contains the `` flag. If it does, then the function retrieves the image handle from the operand at index `` and replaces it with a" LLVM,NVPTX,1680,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the `ReplaceImageHandles` method is not specified. However, based on the name of the method, it is likely that it is intended to replace the image handles in a data structure or object. Without more information about the context in which this code is being used, it is not possible to provide a more specific prediction. If you have any additional information or context, please let me know and I will do my best to assist you." LLVM,NVPTX,1681,The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be a declaration of a variable `Idx` of type `unsigned`. LLVM,NVPTX,1682,"Based on the code snippet you provided, it is difficult to predict the next statement with certainty. However, based on the context and the structure of the code, it is likely that the next statement will be related to the iteration over the basic blocks in the machine function. The code snippet you provided is iterating over the basic blocks in a machine function, and for each basic block, it is iterating over the instructions in the block. The next statement is likely to be related to the instructions in the current basic block. Without more information about the context and the purpose of the code, it is not" LLVM,NVPTX,1683,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `MCSection` class and the values of `V` and `K`. However, based on the name of the class and the parameters passed to the constructor, it is likely that the next statement will be related to the initialization of the `MCSection` object. Here are a few possibilities: 1. The next statement could be a call to the `MCSection` constructor, passing in the values of `V` and `K` as parameters. 2. The next statement" LLVM,NVPTX,1684,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `MCSection` class and the values of `V` and `K`. However, based on the name of the class and the parameters passed to the constructor, it is likely that the next statement will be related to the initialization of the `MCSection` object. Here are a few possibilities: 1. The next statement could be a call to the `MCSection` constructor, passing in the values of `V` and `K` as parameters. 2. The next statement" LLVM,NVPTX,1685,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the code depends on the specific values of the variables and the implementation of the functions called. However, based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the `PrintSwitchToSection` function is overriding a virtual function from a base class, and it is using the `MAI`, `T`, `OS`, and `Subsection` parameters to generate some output. The function is also using the `override` keyword to indicate that it is overriding a virtual function from a base class." LLVM,NVPTX,1686,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the code depends on the specific values of the variables and the implementation of the functions called. However, based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the `PrintSwitchToSection` function is overriding a virtual function from a base class, and it is using the `MAI`, `T`, `OS`, and `Subsection` parameters to generate some output. The function is also using the `override` keyword to indicate that it is overriding a virtual function from a base class." LLVM,NVPTX,1687,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the `isBaseAddressKnownZero` method depends on the specific implementation of the `BaseAddress` class. However, based on the name of the method and the fact that it is declared as `const`, it is likely that this method returns a boolean value indicating whether the base address of the object is known to be zero." LLVM,NVPTX,1688,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the `isVirtualSection` method is not specified. However, based on the name of the method and the fact that it is declared as `virtual`, it is likely that the method will return a boolean value indicating whether the current section is a virtual section or not." LLVM,NVPTX,1689,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `PrintSwitchToSection` method and the input parameters. However, based on the name of the method and the parameters, it is likely that the next statement will be related to printing a section switch to the output stream. Here are some possible next statements: * `OS << MAI.getSectionSwitchString(this);`: This statement would print the section switch string for the current section to the output stream. * `OS << MAI.getSectionSwitchString(this" LLVM,NVPTX,1690,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `PrintSwitchToSection` method and the input parameters. However, based on the name of the method and the parameters, it is likely that the next statement will be related to printing a section switch to the output stream. Here are some possible next statements: * `OS << MAI.getSectionSwitchString(this);`: This statement would print the section switch string for the current section to the output stream. * `OS << MAI.getSectionSwitchString(this" LLVM,NVPTX,1691,The next statement after `return false;` would be the end of the function or method. LLVM,NVPTX,1692,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the code depends on the specific input and the implementation of the `ISA_LIT` class. However, based on the syntax and the fact that the `Section` method is being called on an instance of the `ISA_LIT` class, it is likely that the next statement will be a call to a method or property of the `ISA_LIT` class." LLVM,NVPTX,1693,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the code depends on the specific input and the implementation of the `ISA_LIT` class. However, based on the syntax and the fact that the `Section` method is being called on an instance of the `ISA_LIT` class, it is likely that the next statement will be a call to a method or property of the `ISA_LIT` class." LLVM,NVPTX,1694,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the program depends on the specific implementation of the `getLabelBeginName` method and the data stored in the `Label` object. However, based on the name of the method and the fact that it is declared as a `const` method, it is likely that the method returns a string that represents the beginning of a label. The method may use the data stored in the `Label` object to generate this string. Without more information about the specific implementation of the `Label` class and the `" LLVM,NVPTX,1695,The next statement after `return ;` would be the end of the function. LLVM,NVPTX,1696,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `PrintSwitchToSection` method and the input parameters. However, based on the name of the method and the parameters, it is likely that the next statement will be related to printing a switch statement to the output stream `OS`. Here are a few possibilities for the next statement: 1. `OS << ""switch ("" << Subsection << "") {\n"";` 2. `OS << ""switch ("" << MAI.getSwitchSectionName(Subsection) << "") {\" LLVM,NVPTX,1697,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `PrintSwitchToSection` method and the input parameters. However, based on the name of the method and the parameters, it is likely that the next statement will be related to printing a switch statement to the output stream `OS`. Here are a few possibilities for the next statement: 1. `OS << ""switch ("" << Subsection << "") {\n"";` 2. `OS << ""switch ("" << MAI.getSwitchSectionName(Subsection) << "") {\" LLVM,NVPTX,1698,The next statement after `return ;` would be the end of the function. LLVM,NVPTX,1699,"The next statement of this code snippet is: return ""begin"";" LLVM,NVPTX,1700,The next statement after `return ;` would be the end of the function. LLVM,NVPTX,1701,The next statement after `return ;` would be the end of the function. LLVM,NVPTX,1702,The next statement after `return true ;` would be the end of the function or method. LLVM,NVPTX,1703,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be the return statement, which will return the value of the `isBaseAddressKnownZero` method. The value returned by this method is `true`, which indicates that the base address of the object is known to be zero." LLVM,NVPTX,1704,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `MCSection` class and the values of the `SectionVariant` and `SectionKind` parameters. However, based on the name of the class and the parameters, it is likely that the next statement will be a call to the `MCSection` constructor, which will initialize a new instance of the `MCSection` class with the specified variant and kind." LLVM,NVPTX,1705,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `MCSection` class and the values of the `SectionVariant` and `SectionKind` parameters. However, based on the name of the class and the parameters, it is likely that the next statement will be a call to the `MCSection` constructor, which will initialize a new instance of the `MCSection` class with the specified variant and kind." LLVM,NVPTX,1706,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `OS << MAI.getCommentString() << "" Switch to section "" << Subsection->getSectionName() << ""\n"";` This statement is a call to the `raw_ostream` object's `<<` operator, which is used to output a string to the stream. The string being output is the comment string for the current assembly language, followed by the name of the section being switched to, which is obtained by calling the `getSectionName()` method on the `MCExpr` object. The `<<` operator is then used to" LLVM,NVPTX,1707,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `OS << MAI.getCommentString() << "" Switch to section "" << Subsection->getSectionName() << ""\n"";` This statement is a call to the `raw_ostream` object's `<<` operator, which is used to output a string to the stream. The string being output is the comment string for the current assembly language, followed by the name of the section being switched to, which is obtained by calling the `getSectionName()` method on the `MCExpr` object. The `<<` operator is then used to" LLVM,NVPTX,1708,The next statement after `return false;` would be the end of the function or method. LLVM,NVPTX,1709,The next statement after `return false;` would be the end of the function or method. LLVM,NVPTX,1710,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the program depends on various factors such as the input data, the specific implementation of the `ISA_LIT` class, and the environment in which the program is running. However, based on the information provided, it is likely that the next statement after the constructor for `Section` will be the destructor for `Section`, which is typically denoted by the `~` symbol followed by the name of the class. The destructor is responsible for releasing any resources that were allocated by the constructor, such" LLVM,NVPTX,1711,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the program depends on various factors such as the input data, the specific implementation of the `ISA_LIT` class, and the environment in which the program is running. However, based on the information provided, it is likely that the next statement after the constructor for `Section` will be the destructor for `Section`, which is typically denoted by the `~` symbol followed by the name of the class. The destructor is responsible for releasing any resources that were allocated by the constructor, such" LLVM,NVPTX,1712,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `AU.addPreserved();` This statement adds the string literal `` to the list of preserved values in the `AnalysisUsage` object `AU`." LLVM,NVPTX,1713,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the program depends on the specific implementation of the `SplitBBatBar` class and the input data. However, based on the name of the class and the method being called, it is likely that the next statement will be related to the creation and initialization of a new instance of the `SplitBBatBar` class." LLVM,NVPTX,1714,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be a call to the `addPreserved` method of the `MachineFunctionAnalysis` class, passing in the `AU` object as an argument. The purpose of this method is to add the `AU` object to the list of preserved objects in the `MachineFunctionAnalysis` object." LLVM,NVPTX,1715,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return ""getPassName"";` This is because the `getPassName` function is declared as a virtual function, which means that it can be overridden by a derived class. The `` placeholder is used to indicate that the function returns a string literal, which is a constant string that is stored in the program's memory. The `return` statement is used to return the string literal, which in this case is the string ""getPassName""." LLVM,NVPTX,1716,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the program depends on the specific inputs and the implementation of the `FunctionPass` class. However, based on the name of the function and the parameters passed to it, it appears that the function is intended to split a bar into two parts, with the first part being the ""bat"" and the second part being the ""bar"". Without more information about the context in which this code is being used, it is difficult to provide a more specific prediction about the next statement of the code. If you have any additional" LLVM,NVPTX,1717,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the program depends on the specific inputs and the implementation of the `FunctionPass` class. However, based on the name of the function and the parameters passed to it, it appears that the function is intended to split a bar into two parts, with the first part being the ""bat"" and the second part being the ""bar"". Without more information about the context in which this code is being used, it is difficult to provide a more specific prediction about the next statement of the code. If you have any additional" LLVM,NVPTX,1718,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `changed = true;` This is because the `for` loop is iterating over the `SplitPoints` vector, and the loop variable `i` is being incremented at the end of each iteration. The loop will continue until `i` is equal to the size of the `SplitPoints` vector, at which point the loop will terminate and the next statement will be executed." LLVM,NVPTX,1719,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return hasFP16Math() && NoF16Math == false;` This statement is a boolean expression that returns `true` if both `hasFP16Math()` and `NoF16Math` are `true`, and `false` otherwise." LLVM,NVPTX,1720,"The next statement after the code snippet you provided is: `TargetName = std::string(CPU.empty() ? : CPU);` This statement is assigning the value of `CPU` to `TargetName` if `CPU` is not empty, otherwise it assigns the value of `` to `TargetName`. The `std::string` constructor is used to convert the value of `CPU` or `` to a `std::string` object." LLVM,NVPTX,1721,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be the initialization of the `PTXVersion` and `SmVersion` members of the `Subtarget` class. These members are likely to be initialized with the values of the `PTXVersion` and `SmVersion` parameters passed to the constructor. The code snippet you provided is a constructor for the `Subtarget` class, which is a subclass of the `GenSubtargetInfo` class. The constructor initializes the members of the `Subtarget` class with the values passed to the constructor, including the `PTXVersion` and `SmVersion`" LLVM,NVPTX,1722,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be the initialization of the `PTXVersion` and `SmVersion` members of the `Subtarget` class. These members are likely to be initialized with the values of the `PTXVersion` and `SmVersion` parameters passed to the constructor. The code snippet you provided is a constructor for the `Subtarget` class, which is a subclass of the `GenSubtargetInfo` class. The constructor initializes the members of the `Subtarget` class with the values passed to the constructor, including the `PTXVersion` and `SmVersion`" LLVM,NVPTX,1723,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `Subtarget` class and the `anchor` method. However, based on the name of the method and the fact that it is declared as a member of the `Subtarget` class, it is likely that the next statement will be a call to a method that is specific to the `Subtarget` class." LLVM,NVPTX,1724,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `Subtarget` class and the `anchor` method. However, based on the name of the method and the fact that it is declared as a member of the `Subtarget` class, it is likely that the next statement will be a call to a method that is specific to the `Subtarget` class." LLVM,NVPTX,1725,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be a return statement, as the function is marked as `override` and is expected to return a value of type `const TargetFrameLowering*`. Therefore, the next statement is likely to be: ``` return &FrameLowering; ``` This statement returns a pointer to the `FrameLowering` object, which is a member variable of the class. The `&` operator is used to get the address of the `FrameLowering` object, and the `return` statement is used to return the pointer to the caller of the function." LLVM,NVPTX,1726,"The next statement of this code snippet is: return new TargetFrameLowering();" LLVM,NVPTX,1727,"The next statement of this code snippet is: return &InstrInfo;" LLVM,NVPTX,1728,"The next statement of this code snippet is: return &InstrInfo.getRegisterInfo();" LLVM,NVPTX,1729,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the program depends on various factors such as the input data, the specific implementation of the `TargetSelectionDAGInfo` class, and the environment in which the program is running. However, based on the code snippet provided, it is likely that the next statement after the `getSelectionDAGInfo` method call will be the return statement, which will return the result of the `getSelectionDAGInfo` method call. The return statement is typically the last statement in a method, and it is used to return" LLVM,NVPTX,1730,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the `getSmVersion` function is not specified. However, based on the name of the function and the fact that it is a member of a class, it is likely that the function returns a version number of some kind." LLVM,NVPTX,1731,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the context in which the code is being executed. However, based on the syntax and the fact that the code is returning a reference to a variable named `TLInfo`, it is likely that the next statement will be a statement that uses or manipulates the value of `TLInfo`." LLVM,NVPTX,1732,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the context in which the code is being executed. However, based on the syntax and the fact that the code is returning a reference to a variable named `TLInfo`, it is likely that the next statement will be a statement that uses or manipulates the value of `TLInfo`." LLVM,NVPTX,1733,"The next statement of this code snippet is: return TargetName;" LLVM,NVPTX,1734,"The next statement of this code snippet is: return TargetName;" LLVM,NVPTX,1735,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be a comparison of the `SmVersion` variable with the value of the `NUM_LIT` constant. The `>` operator is used to compare the two values, and the result of the comparison is returned as a boolean value. Therefore, the next statement of this code snippet is likely to be: ``` return SmVersion >= NUM_LIT; ```" LLVM,NVPTX,1736,"The next statement of this code snippet is: return SmVersion >= ; This statement returns a boolean value indicating whether the current version of the software is greater than or equal to the specified version number (). The return value is used to determine whether the current version of the software has the ""atom red gen 32"" feature." LLVM,NVPTX,1737,"The next statement after the code snippet you provided is likely to be a comparison operator, such as `==`, `!=`, `<`, `>`, `<=`, or `>=` followed by a value or variable. For example, the next statement could be: ``` return SmVersion >= 10; ``` This would check if the `SmVersion` variable is greater than or equal to 10, and return `true` if it is, or `false` if it is not. Alternatively, the next statement could be a call to a function or method that takes" LLVM,NVPTX,1738,"The next statement after the code snippet you provided is likely to be a comparison operator, such as `==`, `!=`, `<`, `>`, `<=`, or `>=` followed by a value or variable. For example, the next statement could be: ``` return SmVersion >= 10; ``` This would check if the `SmVersion` variable is greater than or equal to 10, and return `true` if it is, or `false` if it is not. Alternatively, the next statement could be a call to a function or method that takes" LLVM,NVPTX,1739,"The next statement of this code snippet is: return SmVersion >= ; This statement is a comparison of the SmVersion variable with the value . If the comparison is true, the function returns true, otherwise it returns false." LLVM,NVPTX,1740,"The next statement after the code snippet you provided is likely to be a comparison operator, such as `==`, `!=`, `<`, `>`, `<=`, or `>=` followed by a value or variable. For example, the next statement could be: ``` return SmVersion >= 10; ``` This would check if the `SmVersion` variable is greater than or equal to 10, and return `true` if it is, or `false` if it is not. Alternatively, the next statement could be a call to a function or method that takes" LLVM,NVPTX,1741,"The next statement after the code snippet you provided is likely to be a comparison operator, such as `==`, `!=`, `<`, `>`, `<=`, or `>=` followed by a value or variable. For example, the next statement could be: ``` return SmVersion >= 10; ``` This would check if the `SmVersion` variable is greater than or equal to 10, and return `true` if it is, or `false` if it is not. Alternatively, the next statement could be a call to a function or method that takes" LLVM,NVPTX,1742,"The next statement after the code snippet you provided is likely to be a comparison operator, such as `==`, `!=`, `<`, `>`, `<=`, or `>=` followed by a value or variable. For example, the next statement could be: ``` return SmVersion >= 10; ``` This would check if the `SmVersion` variable is greater than or equal to 10, and return `true` if it is, or `false` if it is not. Alternatively, the next statement could be a call to a function or method that takes" LLVM,NVPTX,1743,"The next statement after the code snippet you provided is likely to be a comparison operator, such as `==`, `!=`, `<`, `>`, `<=`, or `>=` followed by a value or variable. For example, the next statement could be: ``` return SmVersion >= 10; ``` This would check if the `SmVersion` variable is greater than or equal to 10, and return `true` if it is, or `false` if it is not. Alternatively, the next statement could be a call to a function or method that takes" LLVM,NVPTX,1744,"The next statement of this code snippet is: return SmVersion >= ;" LLVM,NVPTX,1745,"The next statement after the code snippet you provided is likely to be a comparison operator, such as `==`, `!=`, `<`, `>`, `<=`, or `>=` followed by a value or variable. For example, the next statement could be: ``` return SmVersion >= 10; ``` This would check if the `SmVersion` variable is greater than or equal to 10, and return `true` if it is, or `false` if it is not. Alternatively, the next statement could be a call to a function or method that takes" LLVM,NVPTX,1746,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the `hasFMAF64` function depends on the specific implementation of the `FMAF64` class and the state of the object on which the function is called. However, based on the name of the function and the fact that it is a member function of the `FMAF64` class, it is likely that the function returns a boolean value indicating whether the object has a 64-bit floating-point format. Therefore, a possible next statement of this" LLVM,NVPTX,1747,"The next statement after the code snippet you provided is likely to be a comparison operator, such as `==`, `!=`, `<`, `>`, `<=`, or `>=` followed by a value or variable. For example, the next statement could be: ``` return SmVersion >= 10; ``` This would check if the `SmVersion` variable is greater than or equal to 10, and return `true` if it is, or `false` if it is not. Alternatively, the next statement could be a call to a function or method that takes" LLVM,NVPTX,1748,"The next statement after the code snippet you provided is likely to be a comparison operator, such as `==`, `!=`, `<`, `>`, `<=`, or `>=` followed by a value or variable. For example, the next statement could be: ``` return SmVersion >= 10; ``` This would check if the `SmVersion` variable is greater than or equal to 10, and return `true` if it is, or `false` if it is not. Alternatively, the next statement could be a call to a function or method that takes" LLVM,NVPTX,1749,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return (SmVersion >= );` This statement is executed if the `TM.getDrvInterface()` method returns a string that is equal to ``. The `SmVersion` variable is compared to the value of ``, and if it is greater than or equal to that value, the function returns `true`." LLVM,NVPTX,1750,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the `hasLDU` function depends on the specific implementation of the `Matrix` class and the data it contains. However, based on the name of the function and the fact that it is a member function of the `Matrix` class, it is likely that the function returns a boolean value indicating whether the matrix has an LDU (Lower-Diagonal-Upper) decomposition." LLVM,NVPTX,1751,"The next statement after the code snippet you provided is: return hasHWROT32 ( ) || hasSWROT32 ( ) ; This statement is a return statement that returns the result of the logical OR operation between the two functions `hasHWROT32()` and `hasSWROT32()`. The `hasHWROT32()` function checks if the hardware has a 32-bit ROT (Rotate) instruction, while the `hasSWROT32()` function checks if the software has a 32-bit ROT instruction" LLVM,NVPTX,1752,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the `hasROT64` function depends on the specific implementation of the `ROT64` class and the input data. However, based on the name of the function and the fact that it is declared as `inline`, it is likely that the function is intended to check whether a given input value has a ROT64 encoding. If the input value does not have a ROT64 encoding, the function may return `false`. Therefore, the next statement of this code snippet" LLVM,NVPTX,1753,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the `hasSWROT32` function is dependent on the specific implementation of the `inline` keyword in the C++ compiler being used. However, based on the name of the function and the fact that it is declared as `inline`, it is likely that the function is intended to be an inline function, which means that it is defined within the class definition and can be used as if it were a member of the class. Therefore, the next statement of this code snippet is likely to be" LLVM,NVPTX,1754,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the `hasSWROT32` function is dependent on the specific implementation of the `inline` keyword in the C++ compiler being used. However, based on the name of the function and the fact that it is declared as `inline`, it is likely that the function is intended to be an inline function, which means that it is defined within the class definition and can be used as if it were a member of the class. Therefore, the next statement of this code snippet is likely to be" LLVM,NVPTX,1755,"The next statement after the code snippet you provided is likely to be a comparison operator, such as `==`, `!=`, `<`, `>`, `<=`, or `>=` followed by a value or variable. For example, the next statement could be: ``` return SmVersion >= 10; ``` This would check if the `SmVersion` variable is greater than or equal to 10, and return `true` if it is, or `false` if it is not. Alternatively, the next statement could be a call to a function or method that takes" LLVM,NVPTX,1756,The next statement after the `if` statement is the assignment of `TargetName`. LLVM,NVPTX,1757,"The next statement after the `if` block in the code snippet you provided is the `return` statement. The `return` statement returns the current object, which is the `SubtargetFeatures` object. So, the next statement after the `if` block is: ``` return *this; ```" LLVM,NVPTX,1758,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `InstrInfo = new InstrInfo ( TM );` This statement creates a new instance of the `InstrInfo` class, passing in the `TM` object as an argument. The `InstrInfo` class is used to provide information about the instruction set architecture (ISA) of the target machine. The `TM` object is used to initialize the `InstrInfo` object with the appropriate information about the ISA." LLVM,NVPTX,1759,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `InstrInfo = new InstrInfo ( TM );` This statement creates a new instance of the `InstrInfo` class, passing in the `TM` object as an argument. The `InstrInfo` class is used to provide information about the instruction set architecture (ISA) of the target machine. The `TM` object is used to initialize the `InstrInfo` object with the appropriate information about the ISA." LLVM,NVPTX,1760,"The next statement after the code snippet you provided is likely to be a comparison operator, such as `==`, `!=`, `<`, `>`, `<=`, or `>=` followed by a value or variable. For example, the next statement could be: ``` return SmVersion >= 10; ``` This would check if the `SmVersion` variable is greater than or equal to 10, and return `true` if it is, or `false` if it is not. Alternatively, the next statement could be a call to a function or method that takes" LLVM,NVPTX,1761,"The next statement after the code snippet you provided is likely to be a comparison operator, such as `==`, `!=`, `<`, `>`, `<=`, or `>=` followed by a value or variable. For example, the next statement could be: ``` return SmVersion >= 10; ``` This would check if the `SmVersion` variable is greater than or equal to 10, and return `true` if it is, or `false` if it is not. Alternatively, the next statement could be a call to a function or method that takes" LLVM,NVPTX,1762,The next statement after `return false;` would be the end of the function or method. LLVM,NVPTX,1763,"The next statement of this code snippet is: return false;" LLVM,NVPTX,1764,"The next statement after the code snippet you provided is likely to be a comparison operator, such as `==`, `!=`, `<`, `>`, `<=`, or `>=` followed by a value or variable. For example, the next statement could be: ``` return SmVersion >= 10; ``` This would check if the `SmVersion` variable is greater than or equal to 10, and return `true` if it is, or `false` if it is not. Alternatively, the next statement could be a call to a function or method that takes" LLVM,NVPTX,1765,"The next statement after the code snippet you provided is likely to be a comparison operator, such as `==`, `!=`, `<`, `>`, `<=`, or `>=` followed by a value or variable. For example, the next statement could be: ``` return SmVersion >= 10; ``` This would check if the `SmVersion` variable is greater than or equal to 10, and return `true` if it is, or `false` if it is not. Alternatively, the next statement could be a call to a function or method that takes" LLVM,NVPTX,1766,The next statement after `return true ;` would be the end of the function or method. LLVM,NVPTX,1767,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `PTXVersion = ;` This is a simple assignment statement, where the value of `PTXVersion` is being set to a specific number. The number is not specified in the code snippet you provided, so it could be any number." LLVM,NVPTX,1768,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the `hasAtomScope` function depends on the implementation of the `HasAtomScope` variable and the context in which the function is called. However, based on the name of the function and the fact that it is declared as a `const` member function, it is likely that the function returns a boolean value indicating whether the object has an atom scope or not. Therefore, a possible next statement of this code snippet could be: ``` return HasAtomScope; ```" LLVM,NVPTX,1769,"The next statement after the `if` block is `return false;`. The `if` block is only executed if the condition `getDrvInterface() == ` is true. If the condition is false, the `if` block is skipped and the function returns `false`. Therefore, the next statement after the `if` block is the `return false;` statement." LLVM,NVPTX,1770,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `InstrInfo = new InstrInfo ( TM );` This statement creates a new instance of the `InstrInfo` class, passing in the `TM` object as an argument. The `InstrInfo` class is responsible for providing information about the instruction set architecture (ISA) of the target machine. The `TM` object is used to initialize the `InstrInfo` object with the appropriate information about the ISA." LLVM,NVPTX,1771,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `InstrInfo = new InstrInfo ( TM );` This statement creates a new instance of the `InstrInfo` class, passing in the `TM` object as an argument. The `InstrInfo` class is responsible for providing information about the instruction set architecture (ISA) of the target machine. The `TM` object is used to initialize the `InstrInfo` object with the appropriate information about the ISA." LLVM,NVPTX,1772,"The next statement of this code snippet is: p = ; This is because the `if` statement checks whether the current platform is 64-bit, and if it is, it assigns the value of `p` to the first three string literals. If the platform is not 64-bit, it assigns the value of `p` to the last three string literals. Therefore, the value of `p` will be the first three string literals if the platform is" LLVM,NVPTX,1773,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the `is64Bit()` function and the values of the string literals are not provided. However, based on the syntax and the fact that the code is checking if the system is 64-bit, it is likely that the next statement will be a conditional statement that checks the value of the `p` variable and performs some action based on its value." LLVM,NVPTX,1774,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the `hasROT32` function depends on the specific implementation of the `Rotation3D` class and the values of the `m_rotation` member variable. However, based on the name of the function and the fact that it is declared as `inline`, it is likely that the function returns a boolean value indicating whether the `Rotation3D` object has a rotation of 32 degrees. Therefore, a possible next statement of this code snippet could be: ```" LLVM,NVPTX,1775,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `PTXVersion = ;` This is a variable assignment statement, where the variable `PTXVersion` is being assigned the value ``." LLVM,NVPTX,1776,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `PTXVersion = ;` This is because the `if` statement that precedes it checks whether `PTXVersion` is equal to ``, and if it is, it sets `PTXVersion` to ``." LLVM,NVPTX,1777,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of the code snippet with certainty because it depends on the values of the variables and the behavior of the functions called. However, based on the context, it appears that the code is setting up a target name for a subtarget feature string (FS) based on the CPU name and the PTX version. The first line of the code sets the target name to an empty string if the CPU name is empty, otherwise it sets it to the CPU name. The second line calls the `ParseSubtargetFeatures` function with the target name and the subtarget feature string (" LLVM,NVPTX,1778,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `PTXVersion = ;` This statement assigns the value of `` to the variable `PTXVersion`." LLVM,NVPTX,1779,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the implementation of the `getSelectionDAGInfo` method and the specific context in which it is called. However, based on the name of the method and the fact that it is marked as `const`, it is likely that the method returns a pointer to a `SelectionDAGTargetInfo` object that is a member of the class." LLVM,NVPTX,1780,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the implementation of the `getSelectionDAGInfo` method and the specific context in which it is called. However, based on the name of the method and the fact that it is marked as `const`, it is likely that the method returns a pointer to a `SelectionDAGTargetInfo` object that is a member of the class." LLVM,NVPTX,1781,"The next statement after the code snippet you provided is likely to be a comparison operator, such as `==`, `!=`, `<`, `>`, `<=`, or `>=` followed by a value or variable. For example, the next statement could be: ``` return SmVersion >= 10; ``` This would check if the `SmVersion` variable is greater than or equal to 10, and return `true` if it is, or `false` if it is not. Alternatively, the next statement could be a call to a function or method that takes" LLVM,NVPTX,1782,"The next statement after the code snippet you provided is likely to be a comparison operator, such as `==`, `!=`, `<`, `>`, `<=`, or `>=` followed by a value or variable. For example, the next statement could be: ``` return SmVersion >= 10; ``` This would check if the `SmVersion` variable is greater than or equal to 10, and return `true` if it is, or `false` if it is not. Alternatively, the next statement could be a call to a function or method that takes" LLVM,NVPTX,1783,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the function is dependent on the specific implementation of the `hasAtomMinMax64` function. However, based on the name of the function, it appears to be checking for the presence of a specific type of atom (minimum or maximum) in a data structure. Without more information about the implementation of the function, it is difficult to provide a more specific prediction of the next statement. If you have access to the source code of the function, you may be able to determine the next statement by exam" LLVM,NVPTX,1784,"The next statement after the code snippet you provided is likely to be a comparison operator, such as `==`, `!=`, `<`, `>`, `<=`, or `>=` followed by a value or variable. For example, the next statement could be: ``` return SmVersion >= 10; ``` This would check if the `SmVersion` variable is greater than or equal to 10, and return `true` if it is, or `false` if it is not. Alternatively, the next statement could be a call to a function or method that takes" LLVM,NVPTX,1785,"The next statement after the code snippet you provided is likely to be a comparison operator, such as `==`, `!=`, `<`, `>`, `<=`, or `>=` followed by a value or variable. For example, the next statement could be: ``` return SmVersion >= 10; ``` This would check if the `SmVersion` variable is greater than or equal to 10, and return `true` if it is, or `false` if it is not. Alternatively, the next statement could be a call to a function or method that takes" LLVM,NVPTX,1786,"The next statement after the code snippet you provided is likely to be a comparison operator, such as `==`, `!=`, `<`, `>`, `<=`, or `>=` followed by a value or variable. For example, the next statement could be: ``` return SmVersion >= 10; ``` This would check if the `SmVersion` variable is greater than or equal to 10, and return `true` if it is, or `false` if it is not. Alternatively, the next statement could be a call to a function or method that takes" LLVM,NVPTX,1787,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the `hasFP16Math` function depends on the specific implementation of the `FP16Math` class. However, based on the name of the function and the fact that it is a member of the `FP16Math` class, it is likely that the function returns a boolean value indicating whether the `FP16Math` class has support for floating-point math operations with 16-bit floating-point numbers." LLVM,NVPTX,1788,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `SmVersion = atoi(TargetName.c_str() + );` Explanation: The code snippet sets the `TargetName` variable to `defCPU` if `FS` and `CPU` are both empty, otherwise it sets `TargetName` to `CPU` if `CPU` is not empty, or it calls `llvm_unreachable` if `CPU` is empty. After that, the code snippet sets the `SmVersion` variable to" LLVM,NVPTX,1789,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `SmVersion = atoi(TargetName.c_str() + );` This statement assigns the value of `SmVersion` to the result of the `atoi()` function, which converts the string `TargetName` to an integer. The `c_str()` function is used to convert the `TargetName` string to a C-style string, and the `+ ` operator is used to concatenate the string with the integer literal ``." LLVM,NVPTX,1790,"The next statement of this code snippet is: PTXVersion = ; This is because the if statement checks whether PTXVersion is equal to a specific value (represented by ), and if it is, it sets PTXVersion to the same value." LLVM,NVPTX,1791,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the code depends on the specific input and the implementation of the `DL` class. However, based on the syntax of the code, it appears that the `return` statement is returning a reference to an object of type `DL`. The `&` operator is used to take the address of the object, and the `DL` class is likely a class that represents a data link layer in a network. Without more information about the context in which this code is being used, it is not possible to provide" LLVM,NVPTX,1792,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be a return statement, as the function `getDataLayout` is marked with the `override` keyword, which indicates that it is overriding a virtual function from a base class. The return statement is likely to return a pointer to a `DataLayout` object, which is stored in the variable `DL`. The `DL` variable is likely to be a member variable of the class that contains the `getDataLayout` function, and it is likely to be initialized in the constructor of the class. Therefore, the next statement of this code snippet is" LLVM,NVPTX,1793,"The next statement after the code snippet you provided is likely to be a comparison operator, such as `==`, `!=`, `<`, `>`, `<=`, or `>=` followed by a value or variable. For example, the next statement could be: ``` return SmVersion >= 10; ``` This would check if the `SmVersion` variable is greater than or equal to 10, and return `true` if it is, or `false` if it is not. Alternatively, the next statement could be a call to a function or method that takes" LLVM,NVPTX,1794,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `InstrInfo = new InstrInfo(TM);` This statement creates a new instance of the `InstrInfo` class, passing the `TM` object as an argument. The `InstrInfo` class is a subclass of the `GenSubtargetInfo` class, and it provides information about the instruction set architecture (ISA) of the target machine. The `TM` object is an instance of the `TargetMachine` class, which represents the target machine for which the code is being generated. The `In" LLVM,NVPTX,1795,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `InstrInfo = new InstrInfo(TM);` This statement creates a new instance of the `InstrInfo` class, passing the `TM` object as an argument. The `InstrInfo` class is a subclass of the `GenSubtargetInfo` class, and it provides information about the instruction set architecture (ISA) of the target machine. The `TM` object is an instance of the `TargetMachine` class, which represents the target machine for which the code is being generated. The `In" LLVM,NVPTX,1796,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `InstrInfo = initializeSubtargetDependencies(CPU, FS);` This line initializes the `InstrInfo` member of the `Subtarget` class with the result of the `initializeSubtargetDependencies` function, which takes the `CPU` and `FS` parameters as inputs. The `InstrInfo` member is used to store information about the instruction set architecture (ISA) of the subtarget." LLVM,NVPTX,1797,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `Ret += ;` This statement appends the string literal `` to the end of the `Ret` string." LLVM,NVPTX,1798,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the code depends on the specific input and the implementation of the `DL` class. However, based on the syntax of the code, it appears that the `return` statement is returning a reference to an object of type `DL`. The `&` operator is used to take the address of the object, and the `DL` class is likely a class that represents a data link layer in a network. Without more information about the context in which this code is being used, it is not possible to provide" LLVM,NVPTX,1799,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the implementation of the `getDataLayout` method and the specific context in which it is called. However, based on the name of the method and the fact that it is declared as a `const` method, it is likely that the method returns a pointer to a `DataLayout` object that is associated with the current object." LLVM,NVPTX,1800,The next statement after `return drvInterface;` would be the end of the function. LLVM,NVPTX,1801,The next statement after `return drvInterface;` would be the end of the function. LLVM,NVPTX,1802,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the code depends on the specific implementation of the `FrameLowering` class and the input data. However, based on the syntax and the context in which the code is used, it is likely that the next statement will be a call to the `FrameLowering` class's `lower()` method, which will perform the actual frame lowering operation." LLVM,NVPTX,1803,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the implementation of the `InstrInfo` class and the specific inputs and state of the program. However, based on the syntax and the fact that the `getRegisterInfo()` method is being called on an instance of `InstrInfo`, it is likely that the next statement will be a return statement that returns the result of the `getRegisterInfo()` method. Therefore, the next statement of this code snippet is likely to be: ``` return InstrInfo.getRegisterInfo();" LLVM,NVPTX,1804,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the implementation of the `InstrInfo` class and the specific inputs and state of the program. However, based on the syntax and the fact that the `getRegisterInfo()` method is being called on an instance of `InstrInfo`, it is likely that the next statement will be a return statement that returns the result of the `getRegisterInfo()` method. Therefore, the next statement of this code snippet is likely to be: ``` return InstrInfo.getRegisterInfo();" LLVM,NVPTX,1805,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the code depends on the specific implementation of the `TSInfo` class and the context in which the code is executed. However, based on the syntax and the fact that the code is returning a reference to an object, it is likely that the next statement after this code snippet will be a statement that uses the returned reference to access or modify the `TSInfo` object. For example, the next statement might be something like: ``` TSInfo->someMethod(); ``` This would call the" LLVM,NVPTX,1806,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the code depends on the specific implementation of the `TSInfo` class and the context in which the code is executed. However, based on the syntax and the fact that the code is returning a reference to an object, it is likely that the next statement after this code snippet will be a statement that uses the returned reference to access or modify the `TSInfo` object. For example, the next statement might be something like: ``` TSInfo->someMethod(); ``` This would call the" LLVM,NVPTX,1807,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the context in which the code is being executed. However, based on the syntax and the fact that the code is returning a reference to a variable named `TLInfo`, it is likely that the next statement will be a statement that uses or manipulates the value of `TLInfo`." LLVM,NVPTX,1808,The next statement after `return false;` would be the end of the function or method. LLVM,NVPTX,1809,"The next statement of this code snippet is the end of the function, which is indicated by the closing curly brace `}`." LLVM,NVPTX,1810,"The next statement of this code snippet is: return Is64Bit;" LLVM,NVPTX,1811,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `TheTarget32.SetTarget(ISA_LIT);` This statement sets the target of the `TheTarget32` object to `ISA_LIT`." LLVM,NVPTX,1812,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the program depends on the specific inputs and the implementation of the `Target` class. However, based on the syntax and the fact that the `Target` class is being declared as a static member of the `ISA_LIT` class, it is likely that the next statement will be a definition of the `Target` class, such as: ``` static Target TheTarget64 = new Target(); ``` This would define a static instance of the `Target` class" LLVM,NVPTX,1813,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `RegisterTarget X(getTheTarget32(), , , );` This statement is registering a target for the `Triple::nvptx` architecture with the `getTheTarget32()` function, which is a function that returns a target for the `ISA_LIT` instruction set architecture. The other three string literals are used as arguments" LLVM,NVPTX,1814,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `RegisterTarget` class and the `getThe` function. However, based on the syntax and the fact that the `RegisterTarget` class is being instantiated with the `nvptx64` target, it is likely that the next statement will be a call to the `RegisterTarget` constructor, which will register the target with the `getThe` function. Here is a possible next statement: ``` RegisterTarget" LLVM,NVPTX,1815,"The next statement of this code snippet is: RegisterTarget < Triple :: nvptx64 > Y ( getTheTarget64 ( ) , , , ) ; This statement is creating a new target for the nvptx64 ISA, using the getTheTarget64() function to get the target for the 64-bit version of the ISA. The target is being registered with the RegisterTarget() function" LLVM,NVPTX,1816,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `RegisterTarget` function and the `getTheTarget64` function. However, based on the syntax and the names of the functions, it is likely that the next statement will be a call to the `RegisterTarget` function with the appropriate arguments. The `RegisterTarget` function is likely to be a function that registers a target with the system, and the `getTheTarget64` function is likely to be" LLVM,NVPTX,1817,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be: RegisterTarget < Triple :: nvptx > X ( TheTarget64 , , ) ; This is because the previous statement registers a target for the 32-bit ISA, and the next statement is likely to register a target for the 64-bit ISA. The `RegisterTarget` function is used to register a target for a specific ISA, and the `Triple :: nvptx` parameter specifies" LLVM,NVPTX,1818,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `RegisterTarget` function and the values of the variables `TheTarget32`, `TheTarget64`, ``, and ``. However, based on the syntax and structure of the code, it is likely that the next statement will be a call to the `RegisterTarget` function with the arguments `TheTarget64`, `LowerAllocaPass());" LLVM,NVPTX,1821,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the `addFastRegAlloc` method is not specified. However, based on the name of the method and the fact that it is a member of the `PassConfig` class, it is likely that this method adds a new fast register allocation pass to the pass configuration." LLVM,NVPTX,1822,"The next statement after the given code snippet is: `addPass(createNVVMReflectPass(ST.getSmVersion()));` This statement adds a pass to the optimization pipeline that creates a reflect pass for the NVVM (NVIDIA Virtual Machine) target. The `createNVVMReflectPass` function takes the SM version (a string representing the version of the NVIDIA GPU) as an argument, and returns a pass that reflects the code for the specified SM version. The `addPass` function adds the pass to the optimization pipeline, which will be executed during" LLVM,NVPTX,1823,"Based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the `printAndVerify` function is being called multiple times, with different string literals being passed as arguments. The `addPass` function is also being called multiple times, with different pass IDs being passed as arguments. Based on this information, it is difficult to predict exactly what the next statement of the code snippet will be, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `printAndVerify` and `addPass` functions. However, it is likely that the next statement will be another call to one of these functions, possibly with different arguments." LLVM,NVPTX,1824,"The next statement in this code snippet is likely to be: addPass ( & MemorySSAID ) ; This is because the previous statement in the code snippet is: addPass ( & TwoAddressInstructionPassID ) ; And the next pass in the sequence of passes is typically the MemorySSA pass, which is responsible for analyzing the memory access patterns in the program and generating memory SSA form." LLVM,NVPTX,1825,"The next statement after the code snippet you provided is likely to be a call to the `addPass` function, passing in the result of the `createPrologEpilogPass` function as an argument. Here's a breakdown of the code snippet: * `addPass`: This is a function that takes a single argument, which is a pass object. The function adds the pass to the current optimization pipeline. * `createPrologEpilogPass`: This is a function that creates a new pass object of type" LLVM,NVPTX,1826,"The next statement after the `if` block is the `addPass` function call. The `addPass` function takes a `Peephole` object as its argument, which is created by the `createPeephole` function. The `createPeephole` function creates a new `Peephole` object with the `ISA_LIT` optimization level. Therefore, the next statement after the `if` block is the `addPass` function call with the `Peephole" LLVM,NVPTX,1827,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `addPass` function and the `createProxyRegErasurePass` function. However, based on the names of these functions, it is likely that the next statement will be related to adding a pass to a pipeline or processing chain. Here are a few possibilities: 1. The next statement could be a call to the `addPass` function again, passing in a different pass object. 2. The next statement could be a call to a" LLVM,NVPTX,1828,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the code is incomplete and the next statement depends on the implementation of the `PassConfig` class. However, based on the name of the method and the fact that it is a member function of the `PassConfig` class, it is likely that the next statement will be related to the configuration of a pass in a compiler or optimizer." LLVM,NVPTX,1829,"The next statement of this code snippet is: return false; Explanation: The `llvm_unreachable` macro is used to indicate that the code following it is unreachable. In this case, the code following it is the `return false;` statement. Therefore, the next statement of this code snippet is `return false;`." LLVM,NVPTX,1830,"The `llvm_unreachable` function is a built-in function in LLVM that is used to indicate that a particular code path is unreachable. It is typically used in situations where the compiler can prove that a certain block of code will never be executed. In this code snippet, the `llvm_unreachable` function is being called with a string literal as an argument. This means that the code path that contains this call is unreachable, and the compiler will not generate any code for it. Therefore, the next statement after this code snippet will" LLVM,NVPTX,1831,"The next statement after the code snippet you provided is: `addEarlyCSEOrGVNPass ( ) ;` This statement adds the Early CSE or GVN pass to the optimization pipeline." LLVM,NVPTX,1832,"The next statement in this code snippet is: `addPass(createGVNPass());` This is because the previous statement, `addEarlyCSEOrGVNPass()`, is a function that adds a pass to the optimization pipeline, and the next statement is a function call to `createGVNPass()`, which creates a new pass that performs global value numbering." LLVM,NVPTX,1833,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `PM . add ( createInstructionCombiningPass ( true ) );` This is because the `adjustPassManager` function is being called on a `TargetMachine` object, and it is adding an instruction combining pass to the pass manager. The `createInstructionCombiningPass` function is being called with the argument `true`, which indicates that the pass should be run at the earliest possible point in the optimization pipeline. The resulting pass is then added to the pass manager using the `add` method." LLVM,NVPTX,1834,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `computeDataLayout` function. However, based on the function signature and the variables passed in, it is likely that the function will compute and return a string representing the data layout for a 64-bit or 32-bit architecture, depending on the value of the `is64Bit` parameter. The `UseShortPointers` parameter may also affect the computation of the data layout, but its exact role is not clear from the code snippet provided." LLVM,NVPTX,1835,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `is64Bit` function and the value of the `Ret` variable. However, based on the code snippet provided, it is likely that the next statement will be: `Ret += ;` This is because the `if` statement checks whether the `is64Bit` function returns `false`, and if it does, it adds the string literal to the `Ret` variable." LLVM,NVPTX,1836,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `TargetMachine` class and the `createPassConfig` method. However, based on the name of the method and the parameters it takes, it is likely that the next statement will be a call to the `createPassConfig` method of the `TargetMachine` class, passing in the `PassManagerBase` object `PM` as an argument. Here is an example of what the next statement might look like: ``` TargetPassConfig *config = TargetMachine::createPassConfig" LLVM,NVPTX,1837,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the implementation of the `PassConfig` class and the `ISA_LIT` template parameter. However, based on the syntax and the fact that the `PassConfig` class is being instantiated with the `ISA_LIT` template parameter, it is likely that the next statement will be a constructor call to the `PassConfig` class, passing in the current object and the `PM` object as arguments." LLVM,NVPTX,1838,"The next statement after the given code snippet is: `return TargetTransformInfo ( TTIImpl ( this , F ) ) ;` This statement is returning an instance of the `TargetTransformInfo` class, which is constructed using the `TTIImpl` class and the current `TargetMachine` instance. The `TTIImpl` class is a subclass of `TargetTransformInfo` that provides additional information about the target machine. The `getTargetTransformInfo` method is used to retrieve this information." LLVM,NVPTX,1839,"The next statement is likely to be a call to the `initialize` method of the `PassRegistry` class, passing in the `PR` object as an argument. The `initialize` method is used to initialize the pass registry with the necessary passes for the current target machine. Here is the predicted next statement: ``` PR.initialize(X, Y); ``` This statement will initialize the pass registry with the `X` and `Y` target machines, which are the 32-bit and 64-bit target machines, respectively. The `initialize` method will then register the necessary" LLVM,NVPTX,1840,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `PassConfig` class and the `TargetPassConfig` class. However, based on the names of the classes and the parameters passed to the constructor, it is likely that the next statement will be a call to the `TargetPassConfig` constructor, which will initialize the `TargetPassConfig` object with the `TargetMachine` and `PassManagerBase` objects passed as parameters. Here is an example of what the next statement might look like: ``` TargetPassConfig(TM," LLVM,NVPTX,1841,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `PassConfig` class and the `TargetPassConfig` class. However, based on the names of the classes and the parameters passed to the constructor, it is likely that the next statement will be a call to the `TargetPassConfig` constructor, which will initialize the `TargetPassConfig` object with the `TargetMachine` and `PassManagerBase` objects passed as parameters. Here is an example of what the next statement might look like: ``` TargetPassConfig(TM," LLVM,NVPTX,1842,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `this->TargetMachine32 = new TargetMachine32(T, TT, CPU, FS, Options, RM, CM, OL, JIT);` This statement is creating a new instance of the `TargetMachine32` class and assigning it to the `TargetMachine32` member variable of the current object. The constructor of the `TargetMachine32` class is being called with the provided arguments, and the resulting object is being assigned to the `TargetMachine32` member variable." LLVM,NVPTX,1843,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `this->TargetMachine32 = new TargetMachine32(T, TT, CPU, FS, Options, RM, CM, OL, JIT);` This statement is creating a new instance of the `TargetMachine32` class and assigning it to the `TargetMachine32` member variable of the current object. The constructor of the `TargetMachine32` class is being called with the provided arguments, and the resulting object is being assigned to the `TargetMachine32` member variable." LLVM,NVPTX,1844,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `this->TargetMachine64 = new TargetMachine64(T, TT, CPU, FS, Options, RM, CM, OL, JIT);` This statement is creating a new instance of the `TargetMachine64` class and assigning it to the `TargetMachine64` member variable of the current object. The constructor of the `TargetMachine64` class is being called with the given arguments, and the resulting object is being assigned to the `TargetMachine64` member variable." LLVM,NVPTX,1845,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `this->TargetMachine64 = new TargetMachine64(T, TT, CPU, FS, Options, RM, CM, OL, JIT);` This statement is creating a new instance of the `TargetMachine64` class and assigning it to the `TargetMachine64` member variable of the current object. The constructor of the `TargetMachine64` class is being called with the given arguments, and the resulting object is being assigned to the `TargetMachine64` member variable." LLVM,NVPTX,1846,"The next statement in the code snippet is: `PB.registerPipelineStartEPCallback([this](ModulePassManager &PM, OptimizationLevel Level) {` This line of code is registering a callback function with the `PB` object, which is an instance of the `PassBuilder` class. The callback function is called when the pipeline starts, and it takes two arguments: `PM`, which is a reference to the `ModulePassManager` object, and `Level`, which is an `OptimizationLevel` object. The callback function is defined as a lambda" LLVM,NVPTX,1847,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet without knowing the specific implementation of the `PassConfig` class and the `addEarlyCSEOrGVNPass` method. However, based on the name of the method, it is likely that the next statement will be related to adding a pass for early common subexpression elimination (CSE) or global value numbering (GVN) to the pass configuration. Here are a few possibilities: 1. `addEarlyCSEPass`: This method adds a pass for early CSE to the pass configuration. 2." LLVM,NVPTX,1848,"The next statement after the `if` statement would be `addPass(createGVNPass())` if the condition `getOptLevel() == CodeGenOpt::Aggressive` is true, and `addPass(createEarlyCSEPass())` if the condition is false." LLVM,NVPTX,1849,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `addPass(&RegAllocPassID);` This is because the `addFastRegAlloc` function is adding a pass to the pass manager, and the `RegAllocPassID` is the identifier for the register allocation pass. The `assert` statement is checking that the `RegAllocPass` is not null, and the `` is a string literal that is not relevant to the next statement." LLVM,NVPTX,1850,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `addPass(createReplaceImageHandlesPass());` This is because the `if` statement checks if `ST.hasImageHandles()` is `false`, and if it is, it adds the `ReplaceImageHandlesPass` pass to the optimization pipeline." LLVM,NVPTX,1851,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return false;` This is because the `if` statement checks if `ST.hasImageHandles()` is `false`, and if it is, it adds the `ReplaceImageHandlesPass` pass to the optimization pipeline. If `ST.hasImageHandles()` is `true`, the `if` statement is skipped and the function returns `false`." LLVM,NVPTX,1852,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `TargetPassConfig` class and the `addIRPasses` method. However, based on the names of the passes being added, it appears that the code is adding a series of optimization passes to the LLVM IR. The passes being added include: * `MachineCopyPropagationID` * `TailDuplicateID` * `NVVMReflectPass` * `ISA_LITImageOptimizerPass` * `" LLVM,NVPTX,1853,"Based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the next statement will be: `printAndVerify ( ) ;` This is because the previous statement ended with a semicolon, indicating the end of a statement, and the next statement begins with the `printAndVerify` function, which is likely to be called with a string literal as its argument." LLVM,NVPTX,1854,"The next statement after the code snippet you provided is: `addPass ( & CleanupID ) ;`" LLVM,NVPTX,1855,The next statement after the `if` statement is `addPass ( & StackSlotColoringID ) ;`. LLVM,NVPTX,1856,"The next statement after the code snippet you provided is likely to be a call to the `addPass` function, passing in a new instance of the `PrologEpilogPass` class as the first argument, and `false` as the second argument. Here's a breakdown of the code snippet: * `addPass`: This is a function that takes two arguments: a pass object and a boolean value. The function adds the pass object to the pass manager, and sets the pass object's `is_prolog` flag to the boolean value. * `createTargetMachine > ( ) ;` This statement is returning the result of the `getTM` function, which is a `TargetMachine` object. The `getTM` function is a member function of the `ISA_LIT` class, and it is being called with the `TargetMachine` class as a template parameter. The `getTM` function is responsible for creating and returning a `TargetMachine` object that is associated with the current `ISA_LIT` object." LLVM,NVPTX,1863,"The next statement after the code snippet you provided is likely to be the return statement of the function that contains the code snippet. In the code snippet, the `TargetTransformInfo` object is being constructed using the `TTIImpl` class, which is a subclass of `TargetTransformInfo`. The `TTIImpl` class is being constructed with the `this` pointer and the `F` parameter. The `TargetTransformInfo` object is then being returned from the function. Therefore, the next statement after the code snippet is likely to be the return statement of the function, which will return" LLVM,NVPTX,1864,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be: `RegisterTargetMachineTargetMachine32>(TheTarget32);` This is because the previous statement, `RegisterTargetMachineTargetMachine64>(TheTarget64);`, has already been executed, and the next statement in the sequence is to register the 32-bit target machine for the given ISA." LLVM,NVPTX,1865,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `RegisterTargetMachine < TargetMachine64 > Y ( TheTarget64 ) ;` This statement registers a target machine for the 64-bit ISA with the name ""Target64""." LLVM,NVPTX,1866,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `PassConfig` class and the `TargetPassConfig` class. However, based on the code snippet provided, it is likely that the next statement will be a call to the `TargetPassConfig` constructor, which initializes the `TargetPassConfig` object with the provided `TargetMachine` and `PassManagerBase` objects. Here is an example of what the next statement might look like: ``` TargetPassConfig(TM, PM); ``` This statement would initialize the" LLVM,NVPTX,1867,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `PassConfig` class and the `TargetPassConfig` class. However, based on the code snippet provided, it is likely that the next statement will be a call to the `TargetPassConfig` constructor, which initializes the `TargetPassConfig` object with the provided `TargetMachine` and `PassManagerBase` objects. Here is an example of what the next statement might look like: ``` TargetPassConfig(TM, PM); ``` This statement would initialize the" LLVM,NVPTX,1868,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be the initialization of the `TargetMachine` base class, which is not shown in the snippet. The `TargetMachine32` class is derived from the `TargetMachine` class, and it appears that the constructor for `TargetMachine32` is initializing the base class by calling the constructor for `TargetMachine`. The constructor for `TargetMachine` is not shown in the snippet, but it is likely to take the same arguments as the constructor for `TargetMachine32`, with the addition of a boolean argument to indicate whether the target machine is 3" LLVM,NVPTX,1869,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be the initialization of the `TargetMachine` base class, which is not shown in the snippet. The `TargetMachine32` class is derived from the `TargetMachine` class, and it appears that the constructor for `TargetMachine32` is initializing the base class by calling the constructor for `TargetMachine`. The constructor for `TargetMachine` is not shown in the snippet, but it is likely to take the same arguments as the constructor for `TargetMachine32`, with the addition of a boolean argument to indicate whether the target machine is 3" LLVM,NVPTX,1870,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `TargetMachine64 :: TargetMachine64 ( const Target & T , const Triple & TT , StringRef CPU , StringRef FS , const TargetOptions & Options , Reloc :: Model RM , CodeModel :: Model CM , CodeGenOpt :: Level OL ) : TargetMachine ( T , TT , CPU , FS , Options , RM , CM , OL , true ) {` This is a constructor" LLVM,NVPTX,1871,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `TargetMachine64 :: TargetMachine64 ( const Target & T , const Triple & TT , StringRef CPU , StringRef FS , const TargetOptions & Options , Reloc :: Model RM , CodeModel :: Model CM , CodeGenOpt :: Level OL ) : TargetMachine ( T , TT , CPU , FS , Options , RM , CM , OL , true ) {` This is a constructor" LLVM,NVPTX,1872,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `TargetMachine` class and the code that follows this snippet. However, based on the name of the class and the destructor method, it is likely that this code is part of a class that represents a target machine, and the destructor is being called to clean up resources when the object is no longer needed." LLVM,NVPTX,1873,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `TargetMachine` class and the code that follows this snippet. However, based on the name of the class and the destructor method, it is likely that this code is part of a class that represents a target machine, and the destructor is being called to clean up resources when the object is no longer needed." LLVM,NVPTX,1874,"The next statement after the code snippet you provided is: `return false;` This statement is the last statement in the function, and it returns a boolean value of `false` to indicate that the function did not succeed in adding the pass." LLVM,NVPTX,1875,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be: return TLOF->get(); This is because the `getObjFileLowering()` method is declared as a `const` method, which means that it cannot modify the state of the object. Therefore, it is likely that the method will simply return the result of the `TLOF->get()` method, which is a `TargetLoweringObjectFile` object." LLVM,NVPTX,1876,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be: return TLOF->get(); This is because the `getObjFileLowering()` method is declared as a `const` method, which means that it cannot modify the state of the object. Therefore, it is likely that the method will simply return the result of the `TLOF->get()` method, which is a `TargetLoweringObjectFile` object." LLVM,NVPTX,1877,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `Subtarget` class and the context in which this code is being executed. However, based on the syntax and the fact that the `&` operator is used to take the address of an object, it is likely that the next statement will be a dereference of the `Subtarget` object, using the `*` operator. For example: ``` return *Subtarget; ``` This would return the value of the `Subtarget` object, which is likely to be a" LLVM,NVPTX,1878,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the `is64Bit()` function is not specified. However, based on the name of the function and the fact that it is a member of a class, it is likely that the function returns a boolean value indicating whether the current platform is 64-bit." LLVM,NVPTX,1879,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `RegisterTargetMachine < TargetMachine64 > Y ( TheTarget64 ) ;` This statement registers a target machine for the 64-bit version of the ISA specified by `ISA_LIT`. The `RegisterTargetMachine` function is called with the `TheTarget64` object as an argument, which is the target machine for the 64-bit version of the ISA." LLVM,NVPTX,1880,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet without knowing the context and the purpose of the code. However, based on the syntax and the names of the variables, it appears that the code is defining a target machine for a specific instruction set architecture (ISA) and registering it with a system. The code is using the `RegisterTargetMachine` function to register the target machine with the system. The function takes two arguments: the first is a pointer to a `TargetMachine` object, and the second is a pointer to a `Target` object. The `TargetMachine` object represents the target" LLVM,NVPTX,1881,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be the initialization of the `InstrInfo` object, which is a member of the `TargetMachine` class. The `InstrInfo` object is used to manage the instruction set architecture (ISA) of the target machine. The `InstrInfo` object is initialized with a pointer to the `TargetMachine` object, which is the current object being constructed. This pointer is used to access the ISA information of the target machine. The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be the initialization of the `TLInfo` object, which" LLVM,NVPTX,1882,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be the initialization of the `InstrInfo` object, which is a member of the `TargetMachine` class. The `InstrInfo` object is used to manage the instruction set architecture (ISA) of the target machine. The `InstrInfo` object is initialized with a pointer to the `TargetMachine` object, which is the current object being constructed. This pointer is used to access the ISA information of the target machine. The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be the initialization of the `TLInfo` object, which" LLVM,NVPTX,1883,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be the initialization of the `TargetMachine` object with the given parameters. The `TargetMachine` constructor is called with the following parameters: * `T`: The `Target` object that this `TargetMachine` is being created for. * `TT`: The target triple string. * `CPU`: The CPU name string. * `FS`: The feature string. * `Options`: The `TargetOptions` object that contains the options for this target. * `RM`: The relocation model. * `CM`:" LLVM,NVPTX,1884,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be the initialization of the `TargetMachine` object with the given parameters. The `TargetMachine` constructor is called with the following parameters: * `T`: The `Target` object that this `TargetMachine` is being created for. * `TT`: The target triple string. * `CPU`: The CPU name string. * `FS`: The feature string. * `Options`: The `TargetOptions` object that contains the options for this target. * `RM`: The relocation model. * `CM`:" LLVM,NVPTX,1885,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `TargetMachine64 :: TargetMachine64 ( const Target & T , StringRef TT , StringRef CPU , StringRef FS , const TargetOptions & Options , Reloc :: Model RM , CodeModel :: Model CM , CodeGenOpt :: Level OL ) : TargetMachine ( T , TT , CPU , FS , Options , RM , CM , OL , true ) {` This is the constructor for the" LLVM,NVPTX,1886,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `TargetMachine64 :: TargetMachine64 ( const Target & T , StringRef TT , StringRef CPU , StringRef FS , const TargetOptions & Options , Reloc :: Model RM , CodeModel :: Model CM , CodeGenOpt :: Level OL ) : TargetMachine ( T , TT , CPU , FS , Options , RM , CM , OL , true ) {` This is the constructor for the" LLVM,NVPTX,1887,"The next statement after the given code snippet is: addPass ( createLowerAllocaPass ( ) ) ;" LLVM,NVPTX,1888,"The next statement of this code snippet is: addPass(createPromoteMemoryToRegisterPass());" LLVM,NVPTX,1889,"The next statement in this code snippet is likely to be: addPass(createLowerArgsPass(&getTargetMachine())); This is because the previous statement, addPass(createGenericToNVVMPass()), is a generic pass that lowers the IR to a specific target machine, and the next statement is likely to be a pass that lowers the arguments of the function to the target machine. The LowerArgsPass is a pass that lowers the arguments of the function to the target machine, and" LLVM,NVPTX,1890,"The next statement of this code snippet is: addPass(createPeephole(), false);" LLVM,NVPTX,1891,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `addPass(createPrologEpilogPass(), false);`" LLVM,NVPTX,1892,"The next statement after the code snippet you provided is: `PM.add(createNVVMReflectPass());` This statement adds a new pass to the pass manager (`PM`) by creating a new instance of the `NVVMReflectPass` class using the `createNVVMReflectPass()` function. The `NVVMReflectPass` class is a subclass of the `Pass` class and is used to reflect the NVVM IR (Intermediate Representation) of the program. Therefore, the next statement after the code snippet you provided is adding a" LLVM,NVPTX,1893,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `RegisterTargetMachine < TargetMachine32 > X ( getTheTarget32 ( ) ) ;` This statement registers a target machine for the 32-bit ISA. The `RegisterTargetMachine` function is called with the `TargetMachine32` class as a template parameter, and the `getTheTarget32` function is used to get the 32-bit target machine." LLVM,NVPTX,1894,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `TargetMachine32::TargetMachine32(const Target &T, const Triple &TT, StringRef CPU, StringRef FS, const TargetOptions &Options, Optional RM, CodeModel::Model CM, CodeGenOpt::Level OL) : TargetMachine(T, TT, CPU, FS, Options, RM, CM, OL, false) {` This is a constructor for the `TargetMachine32` class, which is a subclass of the `TargetMachine" LLVM,NVPTX,1895,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `TargetMachine32::TargetMachine32(const Target &T, const Triple &TT, StringRef CPU, StringRef FS, const TargetOptions &Options, Optional RM, CodeModel::Model CM, CodeGenOpt::Level OL) : TargetMachine(T, TT, CPU, FS, Options, RM, CM, OL, false) {` This is a constructor for the `TargetMachine32` class, which is a subclass of the `TargetMachine" LLVM,NVPTX,1896,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `TargetMachine64 :: TargetMachine64 ( const Target & T , const Triple & TT , StringRef CPU , StringRef FS , const TargetOptions & Options , Optional < Reloc :: Model > RM , CodeModel :: Model CM , CodeGenOpt :: Level OL ) : TargetMachine ( T , TT , CPU , FS , Options , RM , CM , OL , true ) {` This" LLVM,NVPTX,1897,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `TargetMachine64 :: TargetMachine64 ( const Target & T , const Triple & TT , StringRef CPU , StringRef FS , const TargetOptions & Options , Optional < Reloc :: Model > RM , CodeModel :: Model CM , CodeGenOpt :: Level OL ) : TargetMachine ( T , TT , CPU , FS , Options , RM , CM , OL , true ) {` This" LLVM,NVPTX,1898,The next statement after the `addPass` call is `return false`. LLVM,NVPTX,1899,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `InstrInfo = new TargetInstrInfoImpl(*this);` This statement creates a new instance of the `TargetInstrInfoImpl` class, passing `*this` (i.e., the current `TargetMachine` object) as the constructor argument. The resulting object is then assigned to the `InstrInfo` field of the `TargetMachine` object." LLVM,NVPTX,1900,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `InstrInfo = new TargetInstrInfoImpl(*this);` This statement creates a new instance of the `TargetInstrInfoImpl` class, passing `*this` (i.e., the current `TargetMachine` object) as the constructor argument. The resulting object is then assigned to the `InstrInfo` field of the `TargetMachine` object." LLVM,NVPTX,1901,"The next statement of this code snippet is: return false; Explanation: The `addPassesToEmitMachineCode` function is a virtual function that is called by the `PassManagerBase` class to add passes to the pass manager. The function takes a `PassManagerBase` reference and a `JITCodeEmitter` reference as arguments. The function returns a boolean value indicating whether the passes were successfully added to the pass manager. In this code snippet, the `addPassesToEmitMachineCode` function is being overridden to return `false`" LLVM,NVPTX,1902,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be the implementation of the `addPassesToEmitMC` function. This function is a virtual function in the `PassManagerBase` class, and it is intended to be overridden by subclasses to add passes to the pass manager. The function takes four arguments: a reference to a `PassManagerBase` object, a reference to a `MCContext` object, a reference to a `raw_ostream` object, and a boolean value. The function returns a boolean value indicating whether the passes were successfully added to the pass manager. The implementation" LLVM,NVPTX,1903,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the `getDataLayout` method is not specified. However, based on the name of the method and the fact that it is declared as a `const` method, it is likely that it returns a pointer to a `DataLayout` object that is associated with the current object. Without more information about the class and its methods, it is not possible to provide a more specific prediction. If you have additional context or information about the class and its methods, I may be able to provide a more accurate prediction." LLVM,NVPTX,1904,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the code depends on the specific implementation of the `FrameLowering` class and the input data. However, based on the syntax and the context in which the code is used, it is likely that the next statement will be a call to the `FrameLowering` class's `lower()` method, which will perform the actual frame lowering operation." LLVM,NVPTX,1905,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the program depends on the specific implementation of the `getFrameLowering` method and the state of the object. However, based on the name of the method and the fact that it is declared as `const`, it is likely that the method returns a pointer to a `TargetFrameLowering` object that is associated with the current object. The `const` qualifier indicates that the method does not modify the state of the object, so it is likely that the method returns a pointer to a `TargetFrameLower" LLVM,NVPTX,1906,"The next statement of this code snippet is: return &InstrInfo;" LLVM,NVPTX,1907,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the `getInstrInfo` method is dependent on the specific implementation of the `InstrInfo` class and the `ISA_LIT` macro. However, based on the name of the method and the fact that it is declared as `const`, it is likely that the method returns a pointer to an object of type `InstrInfo` that contains information about the instruction. The `ISA_LIT` macro is likely used to specify the instruction set architecture (ISA) for which the" LLVM,NVPTX,1908,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the program depends on various factors such as the input data, the specific implementation of the `ManagedStringPool` class, and the environment in which the program is running. However, based on the name of the function `getManagedStrPool`, it is likely that the function returns a pointer to a `ManagedStringPool` object that is managed by the class. The `const` keyword at the end of the function signature suggests that the function does not modify the state of the object, and is likely to be a" LLVM,NVPTX,1909,"The next statement of this code snippet is: return const_cast(&ManagedStrPool);" LLVM,NVPTX,1910,"Based on the code snippet you provided, it seems that the next statement will be: case : return std::make_pair(II->getArgOperand(), llvm::ADDRESS_SPACE_LOCAL); This is because the code is using a switch statement to handle different cases based on the value returned by II->getIntrinsicID(). The first two cases are handling the values and , and the third case is handling the value . The next" LLVM,NVPTX,1911,"The next statement of this code snippet is: return &(InstrInfo.getRegisterInfo());" LLVM,NVPTX,1912,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the code depends on the specific input and the implementation of the `STTI` function. However, based on the syntax and the fact that the code is returning a reference to `STTI`, it is likely that the next statement will be a call to the `STTI` function, possibly with some arguments. Without more information about the context and the implementation of the code, it is not possible to provide a more specific prediction." LLVM,NVPTX,1913,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the code depends on the specific input and the implementation of the `STTI` function. However, based on the syntax and the fact that the code is returning a reference to `STTI`, it is likely that the next statement will be a call to the `STTI` function, possibly with some arguments. Without more information about the context and the implementation of the code, it is not possible to provide a more specific prediction." LLVM,NVPTX,1914,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be the return statement, which returns a pointer to a `TargetSelectionDAGInfo` object. The `getSelectionDAGInfo` function is a member function of the `TargetInfo` class, and it is used to retrieve the `TargetSelectionDAGInfo` object associated with the target. The `TargetSelectionDAGInfo` object contains information about the target's selection DAG, which is used to optimize the target's selection process." LLVM,NVPTX,1915,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `getSubtargetImpl` method in the `ISA_LIT` class. However, based on the name of the method and the fact that it is declared as `const`, it is likely that the method returns a pointer to a `Subtarget` object that is a member of the `ISA_LIT` class." LLVM,NVPTX,1916,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `getSubtargetImpl` method in the `ISA_LIT` class. However, based on the name of the method and the fact that it is declared as `const`, it is likely that the method returns a pointer to a `Subtarget` object that is a member of the `ISA_LIT` class." LLVM,NVPTX,1917,"The next statement after the code snippet you provided is likely to be the return statement of the `getTargetLowering` function, which is not shown in the code snippet you provided. The `getTargetLowering` function is likely to be a member function of a class that is responsible for generating code for a specific target architecture. The function takes a `TargetLowering` object as an argument, which is used to generate the code for the target architecture. The code snippet you provided is likely to be the body of the `getTargetLowering` function, and it is using the `const_cast" LLVM,NVPTX,1918,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the `getVectorTargetTransformInfo` method is not specified. However, based on the name of the method and the fact that it is declared as a `const` method, it is likely that it returns a pointer to a `VectorTargetTransformInfo` object that is associated with the current instance of the class." LLVM,NVPTX,1919,"The next statement of this code snippet is: return &VTTI;" LLVM,NVPTX,1920,"The next statement after the given code snippet is: addPass ( createLowerAllocaPass ( ) ) ;" LLVM,NVPTX,1921,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be: `addPass(createSROAPass());` This is because the `addAddressSpaceInferencePasses()` method is adding a pass to the pass manager, and the `createSROAPass()` method is creating a new pass that is an instance of the `SROAPass` class. The `addPass()` method is then being called with this new pass as an argument, which adds the pass to the pass manager." LLVM,NVPTX,1922,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be: PM.add(createNVVMIRPass()); This is because the previous statement added two passes to the pass manager (createNVVMReflectPass() and createNVVMIntrRangePass()), and the next statement is likely to add another pass to the pass manager. The createNVVMIRPass() function is a common function used to create a pass that performs Intermediate Representation (IR) optimization, so it is a likely candidate for the next statement." LLVM,NVPTX,1923,"The next statement after the code snippet you provided is: `PM.add(createNVVMReflectPass());` This statement adds a new pass to the pass manager (`PM`) by creating a new instance of the `NVVMReflectPass` class using the `createNVVMReflectPass()` function. The `NVVMReflectPass` class is a subclass of the `Pass` class and is used to reflect the NVVM IR (Intermediate Representation) of the program. Therefore, the next statement after the code snippet you provided is adding a" LLVM,NVPTX,1924,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return false;` Explanation: The `addPassesToEmitMC` function is overridden from the `PassManagerBase` class, and it is expected to return a `bool` value indicating whether the pass was successfully added to the pass manager. In this case, the function is returning `false`, which means that the pass was not added successfully." LLVM,NVPTX,1925,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `TargetMachine` class and the `createPassConfig` method. However, based on the name of the method and the parameters it takes, it is likely that the next statement will be a call to the `createPassConfig` method of the `TargetMachine` class, passing in the `PassManagerBase` object `PM` as an argument. Here is an example of what the next statement might look like: ``` TargetPassConfig *config = TargetMachine::createPassConfig" LLVM,NVPTX,1926,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `PassConfig` class and the `ISA_LIT` interface. However, based on the syntax and the fact that the `PassConfig` class is being instantiated with `this` and `PM` as arguments, it is likely that the next statement will be a call to a method or property of the `PassConfig` object that was just created." LLVM,NVPTX,1927,The next statement after `return false;` would be the end of the function or method. LLVM,NVPTX,1928,"Based on the code snippet you provided, it appears that the next statement would be: initializeLowerConstantPass ( PR ) ; This is because the previous statement in the code snippet is: initializeLowerAllocaPass ( PR ) ; And the next statement after that is typically the initialization of the next pass in the sequence." LLVM,NVPTX,1929,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the `useShortPointers` function depends on the specific implementation of the `MyClass` class and the context in which it is called. However, based on the name of the function and the fact that it is a member function of `MyClass`, it is likely that the function returns a boolean value indicating whether or not the class should use short pointers." LLVM,NVPTX,1930,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `is64Bit` function and the value of the `Ret` variable. However, based on the code snippet provided, it is likely that the next statement will be: `Ret += ;` This is because the `if` statement checks whether the `is64Bit` function returns `false`, and if it does, it adds the string literal to the `Ret` variable." LLVM,NVPTX,1931,"The next statement of this code snippet is: return CodeModel::Model();" LLVM,NVPTX,1932,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be: `addPass(createImageOptimizerPass());` This is because the previous statement in the code snippet is `addPass(createGenericToNVVMPass());`, and the next statement after that is `addPass(createImageOptimizerPass());`. The `addPass` function is being called with a new pass object created using the `createImageOptimizerPass` function." LLVM,NVPTX,1933,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `addPass(createPrologEpilogPass(), false);`" LLVM,NVPTX,1934,"The next statement after the code snippet you provided is likely to be a call to the `addPass` function, passing in a new instance of the `PrologEpilogPass` class as the first argument, and `false` as the second argument. Here's a breakdown of the code snippet: * `addPass`: This is a function that takes two arguments: a pass object and a boolean value. The function adds the pass object to the pass manager, and sets the pass object's `is_prolog` flag to the boolean value. * `createTTIImpl ( this ) ) ; } ) ;` This statement is a return statement that returns an instance of the `TargetIRAnalysis` class. The `TargetIRAnalysis` class is a subclass of the `IRAnalysis` class, and it provides a way to analyze the intermediate representation (IR) of a function. The `getTargetIRAnalysis` method is a member function of the `" LLVM,NVPTX,1936,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return TargetIRAnalysis ( [ this ] ( Function & ) { return TargetTransformInfo ( TTIImpl ( this ) ) ; } ) ;` This statement is a return statement that returns an instance of the `TargetIRAnalysis` class. The `TargetIRAnalysis` class is a subclass of the `IRAnalysis` class, and it provides a way to analyze the intermediate representation (IR) of a function. The `getTargetIRAnalysis` method is a member function of the `" LLVM,NVPTX,1937,"The next statement after the code snippet you provided is likely to be: `initializeNVVMReflectPass(*PassRegistry::getPassRegistry());` This is because the code snippet you provided is registering passes with the pass registry, and the `initializeNVVMReflectPass` function is the next pass that needs to be registered." LLVM,NVPTX,1938,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be a call to the `RegisterTargetMachine` function, passing in the `TheTarget32` and `TheTarget64` objects as arguments. This is because the `RegisterTargetMachine` function is called twice in the code snippet, once for each target machine, and it is likely that the next call will be for the `TheTarget64` object." LLVM,NVPTX,1939,"The next statement after the code snippet you provided is likely to be the return statement of the `getTargetLowering` function, which is not shown in the code snippet you provided. The `getTargetLowering` function is likely to be a member function of a class that is responsible for generating code for a specific target architecture. The function takes a `TargetLowering` object as an argument, which is used to generate the code for the target architecture. The code snippet you provided is likely to be the body of the `getTargetLowering` function, and it is using the `const_cast" LLVM,NVPTX,1940,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `getTargetLowering` method in the subclass of `TargetLowering` that is being used. However, based on the name of the method and the fact that it is declared as a `const` method, it is likely that the method returns a pointer to an object of type `TargetLowering` that is associated with the current object. The returned pointer could be used to access the methods and data members of the `TargetLowering` object." LLVM,NVPTX,1941,"The next statement after the code snippet you provided is: `addPass(createISelDag(getTargetMachine(), getOptLevel()));` This statement creates a new pass using the `createISelDag` function, which is a template function that takes two arguments: a `TargetMachine` object and an optimization level. The `getTargetMachine` function is used to get the current target machine, and the `getOptLevel` function is used to" LLVM,NVPTX,1942,"The next statement in this code snippet is: `addPass(createGVNPass());` This is because the `if` statement checks if the optimization level is set to `CodeGenOpt::Aggressive`, and if it is, it adds the `createGVNPass()` pass to the list of passes to be executed." LLVM,NVPTX,1943,"The next statement after the `if` block is: `addPass(createGVNPass());` This statement creates a new pass object using the `createGVNPass` function and adds it to the pass manager using the `addPass` method. The `GVN` pass is a global value numbering pass that is used to reduce the number of global values in the program by eliminating redundant global values. It is typically run after other optimization passes that may have introduced new global values." LLVM,NVPTX,1944,The next statement after the `addPass` call is the `return false` statement. LLVM,NVPTX,1945,The next statement after `return false;` would be the end of the function or method. LLVM,NVPTX,1946,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `RegisterTargetMachine < TargetMachine64 > Y ( TheTarget64 ) ;` This statement registers a target machine with the name ""Y"" and the ISA ""TargetMachine64"". The target machine is initialized with the name ""TheTarget64""." LLVM,NVPTX,1947,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be the initialization of the `TargetMachine` object with the given parameters. The `TargetMachine` constructor is called with the following parameters: * `T`: The `Target` object that this `TargetMachine` is being created for. * `TT`: The target triple string. * `CPU`: The CPU name string. * `FS`: The feature string. * `Options`: The `TargetOptions` object that contains the options for this target. * `RM`: The relocation model. * `CM`:" LLVM,NVPTX,1948,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be the initialization of the `TargetMachine` object with the given parameters. The `TargetMachine` constructor is called with the following parameters: * `T`: The `Target` object that this `TargetMachine` is being created for. * `TT`: The target triple string. * `CPU`: The CPU name string. * `FS`: The feature string. * `Options`: The `TargetOptions` object that contains the options for this target. * `RM`: The relocation model. * `CM`:" LLVM,NVPTX,1949,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `TargetMachine64 :: TargetMachine64 ( const Target & T , StringRef TT , StringRef CPU , StringRef FS , const TargetOptions & Options , Reloc :: Model RM , CodeModel :: Model CM , CodeGenOpt :: Level OL ) : TargetMachine ( T , TT , CPU , FS , Options , RM , CM , OL , true ) {` This is the constructor for the" LLVM,NVPTX,1950,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `TargetMachine64 :: TargetMachine64 ( const Target & T , StringRef TT , StringRef CPU , StringRef FS , const TargetOptions & Options , Reloc :: Model RM , CodeModel :: Model CM , CodeGenOpt :: Level OL ) : TargetMachine ( T , TT , CPU , FS , Options , RM , CM , OL , true ) {` This is the constructor for the" LLVM,NVPTX,1951,"Based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the next statement after the `disablePass` calls would be the creation of a new pass using the `createNVVMReflectPass` function. Here's a breakdown of the code snippet: 1. The `disablePass` function is called multiple times with different pass IDs. This disables the specified passes. 2. The `getTM` function is called to get the target machine. 3. The `getSubtargetImpl` function is called on the target machine to get the subtarget. 4. The `createN" LLVM,NVPTX,1952,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the `addRegAssignmentOptimized` method is dependent on the specific implementation of the `RegAssignmentOptimizer` class and the input data it receives. However, based on the name of the method and the fact that it is marked as `override`, it is likely that this method is intended to add a new assignment to a register in an optimized manner. The method may use various techniques such as register allocation, instruction scheduling, and code reordering to optimize the assignment of registers to variables" LLVM,NVPTX,1953,"Based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the next statement will be to initialize the ""LowerConstantCopiesPass"" for the specified ISA. The code snippet is initializing various passes for the NVVM IR, and the previous statements have initialized passes for intrinsic range, generic to NVVM, alloca hoisting, assigning valid global names, lowering arguments, lowering alloca, lowering aggregate copies, and proxy register erasure. The next logical step would be to initialize the pass for lowering constant copies." LLVM,NVPTX,1954,"The next statement in the code snippet is likely to be: `initializeLowerConstPass ( PR ) ;` This is because the previous statement in the code snippet is `initializeLowerAggrCopiesPass ( PR ) ;`, which initializes the `LowerAggrCopiesPass` pass for the `ISA_LIT` instruction set architecture. The next logical step would be to initialize the `LowerConstPass` pass for the same instruction set architecture." LLVM,NVPTX,1955,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `LLVMTargetMachine::LLVMTargetMachine(T, computeDataLayout(is64bit, UseShortPointersOpt), TT, CPU, FS, Options, Reloc::PIC_, getEffectiveCodeModel(CM, CodeModel::Small), OL)` This statement is a constructor call to the `LLVMTargetMachine` class, which is a subclass of `TargetMachine`. The constructor takes several arguments, including the `Target` object `T`, a `computeDataLayout` function call that computes the data" LLVM,NVPTX,1956,"The next statement in this code snippet is likely to be a call to the `addPass` function, which adds a pass to the pass manager. The function takes a single argument, which is a pointer to a pass object. The type of the pass object is not specified in the code snippet, but it is likely to be a subclass of the `Pass` class. The `addPass` function is called multiple times in the code snippet, each time with a different pass object. The passes are added to the pass manager in the order they are called, so the order of the passes in the code snippet is important" LLVM,NVPTX,1957,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `ST` class and the value of the `Ret` variable. However, based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the `ST` class has a method called `is64Bit` that returns a boolean value indicating whether the system is 64-bit. If the system is not 64-bit, the code adds a string literal to the `Ret` variable. Therefore, the next statement of this code snippet could be either:" LLVM,NVPTX,1958,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be: addPass(createAddressSpaceInferencePass()); This is because the previous statement, `addAddressSpaceInferencePasses()`, is a function that adds a series of passes related to address space inference, and the next statement is likely to be the first pass in that series. The specific pass that is added will depend on the value of `ISA_LIT`, which is not specified in the code snippet provided." LLVM,NVPTX,1959,"The next statement is: addPass(createInlinePass());" LLVM,NVPTX,1960,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return TargetTransformInfo TargetMachine :: getTargetTransformInfo ( const Function & F ) const;` This statement is a method call that returns an instance of the `TargetTransformInfo` class, which is a subclass of the `TargetMachine` class. The method takes a constant reference to a `Function` object as an argument, and returns a `TargetTransformInfo` object that is associated with the given function. The `ISA_LIT` template parameter is used to specify the instruction set architecture (ISA) of" LLVM,NVPTX,1961,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return TargetTransformInfo TargetMachine :: getTargetTransformInfo ( const Function & F ) const;` This statement is a method call that returns an instance of the `TargetTransformInfo` class, which is a subclass of the `TargetMachine` class. The method takes a constant reference to a `Function` object as an argument, and returns a `TargetTransformInfo` object that is associated with the given function. The `ISA_LIT` template parameter is used to specify the instruction set architecture (ISA) of" LLVM,NVPTX,1962,"The next statement after the code snippet you provided is: `TargetPassConfig::addIRPasses();` This line adds the IR passes that were previously defined to the `TargetPassConfig` object, which is used to configure the optimization pipeline for the LLVM IR." LLVM,NVPTX,1963,"The next statement after the code snippet you provided is likely to be the return statement of the function that contains the code snippet. In the code snippet, the `TargetTransformInfo` object is being constructed using the `TTIImpl` class, which is a subclass of `TargetTransformInfo`. The `TTIImpl` class is being constructed with the `this` pointer and the `F` parameter. The `TargetTransformInfo` object is then being returned from the function. Therefore, the next statement after the code snippet is likely to be the return statement of the function, which will return" LLVM,NVPTX,1964,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet without knowing the context and the implementation of the `TargetIRAnalysis` and `TargetTransformInfo` functions. However, based on the syntax and the names of the functions, it appears that the code is trying to perform some kind of analysis or transformation on a function `F` that is being passed as an argument to the `TargetIRAnalysis` function. The `TargetIRAnalysis` function appears to be a higher-order function that takes another function as an argument, and returns a new function that performs some kind of analysis or transformation on the" LLVM,NVPTX,1965,"The next statement in this code snippet is: initializeLowerKernelArgsPass( * PassRegistry :: getPassRegistry ( ) ) ; This statement is initializing the LowerKernelArgsPass, which is a pass that lowers kernel arguments to a specific address space. The macro is used to specify the instruction set architecture (ISA) for the pass." LLVM,NVPTX,1966,"The next statement in this code snippet is: `addPass(createInferAddressSpacesPass());` This statement creates a new pass object using the `createInferAddressSpacesPass()` function, and then adds it to the pass manager using the `addPass()` method. The `ISA_LIT` template parameter specifies the instruction set architecture (ISA) for the pass, and the `InferAddressSpacesPass` class is the name of the pass being created." LLVM,NVPTX,1967,"The next statement after the given code snippet is: addPass ( createLowerAllocaPass ( ) ) ;" LLVM,NVPTX,1968,"Based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the next statement will be: `initializeLowerCallPass(PR);` This is because the previous statement initialized the `LowerAllocaPass` for the `ISA_LIT` instruction set, and the next logical step would be to initialize the `LowerCallPass` for the same instruction set." LLVM,NVPTX,1969,"The next statement in the code snippet is: initializeLowerArgsPass ( PR ) ; This statement initializes the LowerArgsPass, which is a pass that lowers the arguments of a function to a specific address space." LLVM,NVPTX,1970,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `PM.addPass(NVVMIntrRangePass());`" LLVM,NVPTX,1971,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be a call to the `RegisterTargetMachine` function, passing in the `TheTarget32` and `TheTarget64` objects as arguments. This is because the `RegisterTargetMachine` function is called twice in the code snippet, once for each target machine, and it is likely that the next call will be for the `TheTarget64` object." LLVM,NVPTX,1972,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be the call to the `addPass` function, which is passed a reference to the `StrongPHIEliminationID` object. The `addPass` function is not defined in the code snippet provided, so it is not possible to determine its exact behavior. However, based on the name of the function and the context in which it is called, it is likely that it adds a pass to a list of passes to be executed in the optimization pipeline." LLVM,NVPTX,1973,"Based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the `PassConfig` class is being extended to add some additional passes for the NVVM target. The `addIRPasses` method is being overridden to disable some passes that are not needed for the NVVM target, and then some new passes are being added using the `addPass` method. The next statement in the code snippet is `TargetPassConfig::addIRPasses();`. This line is calling the `addIRPasses` method of the `TargetPassConfig` class, which is likely adding some passes that are specific to the" LLVM,NVPTX,1974,"The next statement after the code snippet you provided is: `disablePass ( & LoopInvariantCodeMotionID ) ;`" LLVM,NVPTX,1975,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be a call to the `createTargetRegisterAllocator` function, which is a member function of the `ISA_LIT` class. The function takes a single argument of type `bool` and returns a pointer to a `FunctionPass` object. The code snippet is likely to be part of a larger program that is using the `ISA_LIT` class to perform some kind of optimization or analysis on a function. The `createTargetRegisterAllocator` function is being called to create a new instance of a `FunctionPass` object" LLVM,NVPTX,1976,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the code depends on the specific implementation of the `DataLayout` class and the context in which the code is executed. However, based on the syntax and the fact that the code is returning a reference to an object, it is likely that the next statement will be a statement that uses the returned reference to access or manipulate the `DataLayout` object. Without more information about the specific implementation of the `DataLayout` class and the context in which the code is executed, it is not possible to provide" LLVM,NVPTX,1977,"The next statement of this code snippet is: RegisterTargetMachine < TargetMachine32 > X ( TheTarget32 ) ; This statement registers a target machine with the name ""X"" and the ISA ""TargetMachine32"". The target machine is passed as an argument to the function ""TheTarget32"", which is a function that returns a pointer to a target machine." LLVM,NVPTX,1978,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `InstrInfo = new TargetInstrInfoImpl(*this);` This statement creates a new instance of the `TargetInstrInfoImpl` class, passing `*this` (i.e., the current `TargetMachine` object) as the constructor argument. The resulting object is then assigned to the `InstrInfo` field of the `TargetMachine` object." LLVM,NVPTX,1979,"The next statement after the code snippet you provided is: addPass(createLowerKernelArgsPass(&getTargetMachine())); This statement creates a new pass object using the createLowerKernelArgsPass() function, and then adds it to the pass manager using the addPass() function. The createLowerKernelArgsPass() function takes a single argument, which is a pointer to the target machine object. The target machine object is obtained using the getTargetMachine32 > X ( TheTarget32 ) ;` This statement registers a target machine for the 32-bit ISA. The `RegisterTargetMachine` function is called with the `ISA_LIT` template parameter, which is the name of the ISA, and the `TheTarget32` template parameter, which is the name of the target machine for the 32-bit ISA" LLVM,NVPTX,1981,"The next statement after the code snippet you provided is likely to be the initialization of the `GenericToNVVM` pass, which is a pass that converts generic LLVM IR to NVVM IR. Here's the full code snippet with the initialization of the `GenericToNVVM` pass: ``` initializeNVVMReflectPass(*PassRegistry::getPassRegistry()); initializeGenericToNVVMPass(*PassRegistry::getPassRegistry()); initializeAllocaHoistingPass(*PassRegistry::getPassRegistry()); initializeGeneric" LLVM,NVPTX,1982,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `TLOF = make_unique();` This statement creates a new instance of the `ISA_LIT::TargetObjectFile` class and assigns it to the `TLOF` variable. The `make_unique` function is used to create a unique pointer to the new object, which is then assigned to `TLOF`." LLVM,NVPTX,1983,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be: PM.add(createTargetTransformInfoPass(this)); This is because the previous statement, PM.add(createBasicTargetTransformInfoPass(this)), adds a pass to the pass manager that creates a basic target transform info pass. The next statement is likely to be a similar call to PM.add(), but with a different pass. The createTargetTransformInfoPass() function is likely to be a factory function that creates a new pass object based on the current target machine." LLVM,NVPTX,1984,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be the initialization of the `TLOF` member variable, which is a unique pointer to an object of type `TargetObjectFile`. The `make_unique` function is used to create the object and the `TargetObjectFile` constructor is called with no arguments. Therefore, the next statement of this code snippet is likely to be: `TLOF = make_unique();`" LLVM,NVPTX,1985,"The next statement in this code snippet is: `addPass(createImageOptimizerPass());` This statement adds a pass to the optimization pipeline that optimizes the code for the ISA_LIT instruction set architecture. The `createImageOptimizerPass()` function creates an instance of the `ISA_LITImageOptimizerPass` class, which is a subclass of the `ImageOptimizerPass` class. This pass is used to optimize the code for the ISA_LIT instruction set architecture," LLVM,NVPTX,1986,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `TLOF = llvm::make_unique();` This statement creates a new instance of the `TargetObjectFile` class and assigns it to the `TLOF` variable. The `make_unique` function is used to create a unique pointer to the `TargetObjectFile` object, which is then assigned to `TLOF`." LLVM,NVPTX,1987,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be the initialization of the `Subtarget` object, which is a member variable of the `TargetMachine` class. The `Subtarget` object is constructed using the `TT`, `CPU`, `FS`, and `this` parameters, which are passed to the `TargetMachine` constructor. The `Subtarget` object is used to represent the target architecture and its specific features, such as the instruction set, the memory model, and the calling conventions. It is used by the `TargetMachine` to generate code for the target architecture. There" LLVM,NVPTX,1988,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `TargetPassConfig::addIRPasses();`" LLVM,NVPTX,1989,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `InstrInfo = new TargetInstrInfoImpl(*this);` This statement creates a new instance of the `TargetInstrInfoImpl` class, passing `*this` (i.e., the current `TargetMachine` object) as the constructor argument. The resulting object is then assigned to the `InstrInfo` field of the `TargetMachine` object." LLVM,NVPTX,1990,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `InstrInfo = new TargetInstrInfoImpl(*this);` This statement creates a new instance of the `TargetInstrInfoImpl` class, passing `*this` (i.e., the current `TargetMachine` object) as the constructor argument. The resulting object is then assigned to the `InstrInfo` field of the `TargetMachine` object." LLVM,NVPTX,1991,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `LLVMTargetMachine::LLVMTargetMachine(T, TT, CPU, FS, Options, RM, CM, OL)` This is a constructor call, which is initializing the `LLVMTargetMachine` object with the given parameters. The constructor is defined in the `LLVMTargetMachine` class, which is a subclass of `TargetMachine`. The constructor initializes the `LLVMTargetMachine` object with the given parameters and sets up the necessary data structures for the target machine." LLVM,NVPTX,1992,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `LLVMTargetMachine::LLVMTargetMachine(T, TT, CPU, FS, Options, RM, CM, OL)` This is a constructor call, which is initializing the `LLVMTargetMachine` object with the given parameters. The constructor is defined in the `LLVMTargetMachine` class, which is a subclass of `TargetMachine`. The constructor initializes the `LLVMTargetMachine` object with the given parameters and sets up the necessary data structures for the target machine." LLVM,NVPTX,1993,"The next statement in the code snippet is: initializeConstantPropagationPass( * PassRegistry :: getPassRegistry ( ) ) ;" LLVM,NVPTX,1994,"Based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the next statement after the three `disablePass` calls would be the `TargetPassConfig::addIRPasses` method call. This method is likely used to add passes to the target pass configuration, which is then used to configure the optimization pipeline for the compiler. Therefore, the next statement after the three `disablePass` calls would be: ``` TargetPassConfig::addIRPasses(); ```" LLVM,NVPTX,1995,"The next statement after the given code snippet is likely to be the call to the `disablePass` function with the `MachineCopyPropagationID` argument. Therefore, the next statement is likely to be: `disablePass ( & MachineCopyPropagationID ) ;`" LLVM,NVPTX,1996,"The next statement of this code snippet is: addPass(createImageOptimizerPass()); This is because the previous statement, `addPass(createGenericToNVVMPass());`, is a function call that adds a pass to the optimization pipeline. The next statement is another function call that adds a different pass to the pipeline. The function being called is `createImageOptimizerPass()`, which creates an instance of the `ISA_LIT` image optimizer pass." LLVM,NVPTX,1997,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `addPass` function and the order in which the passes are executed. However, based on the names of the passes being added, it is likely that the next statement will add another pass to the sequence of passes being applied to the code. Some possible next statements could be: * `addPass(createDeadCodeEliminationPass())`: This would add a pass that eliminates dead code, which could help reduce the size of the generated" LLVM,NVPTX,1998,"Based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the next statement after the `addPass` calls would be the `return` statement, which would return the `PassConfig` object. Here's the predicted next statement: ``` return *this; ```" LLVM,NVPTX,1999,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `RegisterTargetMachine < TargetMachine32 > X ( TheTarget32 ) ;` This statement registers a target machine for the 32-bit ISA. The `RegisterTargetMachine` function is called with the `ISA_LIT` template parameter, which is the name of the ISA, and the `TheTarget32` template parameter, which is the name of the target machine for the 32-bit ISA" LLVM,NVPTX,2000,"Based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the next statement will be: `addPass(createLowerArgsPass(&getTargetMachine()));` This is because the previous statement, `addPass(createGenericToNVVMPass());`, is followed by a conditional statement that checks the optimization level and adds a pass if the optimization level is not `CodeGenOpt::None`. The next statement after the conditional statement is `addPass(createLowerArgsPass(&getImageOptimizerPass())`. This is because the previous statement, `addPass(createGenericToNVVMPass())`, is a function call that adds a pass to the pipeline, and the next statement is another function call that adds a pass to the pipeline. The function being called is `createImageOptimizerPass()`, which is likely to be a function that creates an image optimizer pass for the specified ISA" LLVM,NVPTX,2002,"The next statement after the code snippet you provided is likely to be a call to the `initialize` function for the next pass that needs to be registered with the pass registry. The `initialize` function is used to initialize a pass and register it with the pass registry. It takes a pointer to the pass registry and a pointer to the pass as arguments. Based on the code snippet you provided, it appears that the next pass to be initialized is the `ISA_LIT` alloca hoisting pass. Therefore, the next statement is likely to be a call to the `initialize` function for the" LLVM,NVPTX,2003,"The next statement is: addPass(createGlobalOptimizerPass());" LLVM,NVPTX,2004,"Based on the code snippet, it appears that the next statement will be: addPass(createNVVMReflectPass(ST.getSmVersion())); This is because the code is currently inside an if statement that checks if the target triple's OS is CUDA and the environment is SYCLDevice. If this condition is true, the code will add a pass to the pipeline using the createNVVMReflectPass function and passing in the SM version from the subtarget." LLVM,NVPTX,2005,"The next statement after the code snippet you provided is: `return PR;`" LLVM,NVPTX,2006,"The next statement after the code snippet you provided is: `addPass(createImageOptimizerPass());` This statement adds a pass to the optimization pipeline that optimizes the image for the specified instruction set architecture (ISA). The `createImageOptimizerPass()` function creates a new instance of the `ImageOptimizerPass` class, which is a subclass of the `Pass` class. The `addPass()` function adds this pass to the optimization pipeline. The `ISA_LIT` parameter is" LLVM,NVPTX,2007,"The next statement in the code snippet is: addPass(createDeadCodeEliminationPass());" LLVM,NVPTX,2008,"The next statement after the given code snippet is: addPass(createDeadCodeEliminationPass());" LLVM,NVPTX,2009,"The next statement after the code snippet you provided is: addPass(createDeadCodeEliminationPass());" LLVM,NVPTX,2010,"The next statement in this code snippet is likely to be a call to the `addPass` function, which adds a pass to the pass manager. The function takes a single argument, which is a pointer to a pass object. The pass object is created using the `create` function, which takes a template argument that specifies the type of pass to create. The next statement is likely to be: ``` addPass(createLowerArgsPass(&getTargetMachine())); ``` This statement creates a new pass object of type `ISA" LLVM,NVPTX,2011,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be the body of the `addPassesToEmitMachineCode` function, which is defined as an override of the base class's `addPassesToEmitMachineCode` function. The function takes three arguments: a `PassManagerBase` reference, a `JITCodeEmitter` reference, and a boolean value. The function is expected to add passes to the pass manager that will emit machine code for the JIT compiler. The first statement of the function is likely to be a call to the `addPass` function of" LLVM,NVPTX,2012,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return true;` This statement is the last statement in the `addPassesToEmitMachineCode` function, and it returns a boolean value indicating whether the function was successful or not. In this case, the function is returning `true` to indicate that it was successful." LLVM,NVPTX,2013,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet without knowing the specific implementation of the `getSubtargetImpl` and `getFrameLowering` methods. However, based on the syntax and the fact that the code is using the `->` operator, it is likely that the next statement will be a method call on the object returned by `getSubtargetImpl`. For example, the next statement could be: ``` return getSubtargetImpl()->getFrameLowering()->someMethod(); ``` This would call the `someMethod` method on the object returned by `getFrameLowering" LLVM,NVPTX,2014,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet without knowing the context and the implementation of the `getSubtargetImpl` and `getInstrInfo` methods. However, based on the syntax and the naming conventions used in the code, it is likely that the next statement will be a call to the `getInstrInfo` method, which is likely to return an object that contains information about the instruction being processed." LLVM,NVPTX,2015,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `getInstrInfo` method in the derived class. However, based on the name of the method and the fact that it is marked as `override`, it is likely that the method returns an object of type `InstrInfo` that contains information about the instruction." LLVM,NVPTX,2016,"The next statement after the code snippet you provided is likely to be a closing curly brace `}` to end the function or method that contains the code snippet. The code snippet you provided is a return statement that is casting the address of a `ManagedStringPool` object to a `const` pointer to a `ManagedStringPool`. The `const_cast` operator is used to remove the `const` qualifier from the pointer, which allows the function or method to return a non-const pointer to the `ManagedStringPool` object. Without seeing the rest of the code, it's" LLVM,NVPTX,2017,"The next statement of this code snippet is: return const_cast(&ManagedStrPool);" LLVM,NVPTX,2018,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet without knowing the implementation of the `getSubtargetImpl` and `getRegisterInfo` methods. However, based on the syntax and the fact that the method is returning a value, it is likely that the next statement will be a return statement. Here is a possible next statement: ``` return getSubtargetImpl().getRegisterInfo(); ``` This statement will return the result of the `getRegisterInfo` method called on the object returned by the `getSubtargetImpl` method." LLVM,NVPTX,2019,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet without knowing the context and the implementation of the `getSubtargetImpl` and `getSelectionDAGInfo` methods. However, based on the syntax and the names of the methods, it is likely that the next statement will be a call to the `getSelectionDAGInfo` method, which is a member of the object returned by the `getSubtargetImpl` method. Therefore, the next statement of this code snippet is likely to be: ``` return getSubtargetImpl().getSelectionDAGInfo(); ``` This statement" LLVM,NVPTX,2020,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet without knowing the context and the implementation of the `getSubtargetImpl` and `getSelectionDAGInfo` methods. However, based on the syntax and the names of the methods, it is likely that the next statement will be a call to the `getSelectionDAGInfo` method, which is a member of the object returned by the `getSubtargetImpl` method. Therefore, the next statement of this code snippet is likely to be: ``` return getSubtargetImpl().getSelectionDAGInfo(); ``` This statement" LLVM,NVPTX,2021,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the program depends on various factors, including the input data and the specific implementation of the `getSubtargetImpl` method. However, based on the code snippet provided, it is likely that the next statement will be a call to the `getSubtargetImpl` method, which is a virtual method that is defined in the `ISA_LIT` class. The `getSubtargetImpl` method is expected to return a pointer to an object of type `ISA_LIT::Subtarget`, which" LLVM,NVPTX,2022,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `Subtarget` class and the context in which this code is being executed. However, based on the syntax and the fact that the `&` operator is used to take the address of an object, it is likely that the next statement will be a dereference of the `Subtarget` object, using the `*` operator. For example: ``` return *Subtarget; ``` This would return the value of the `Subtarget` object, which is likely to be a" LLVM,NVPTX,2023,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `getTargetLowering` method in the derived class. However, based on the name of the method and the fact that it is declared as `const`, it is likely that the method returns a pointer to an object of type `TargetLowering` that is associated with the current object." LLVM,NVPTX,2024,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `getTargetLowering` method in the derived class. However, based on the name of the method and the fact that it is declared as `const`, it is likely that the method returns a pointer to an object of type `TargetLowering` that is associated with the current object." LLVM,NVPTX,2025,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `MCSection` class and the `SectionKind` enum. However, based on the code provided, it is likely that the next statement will be a call to the `new` operator to create a new instance of the `Section` class, passing in the `MCSection` object and the `SectionKind` object as arguments. For example, the next statement could be: ``` DwarfStrSection = new Section(MCSection::SV" LLVM,NVPTX,2026,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `TargetLoweringObjectFile` class and the `MCSection` class. However, based on the names of the variables and the methods being called, it appears that the next statement is likely to be a call to the `TargetLoweringObjectFile::Initialize` method, which initializes the `TargetLoweringObjectFile` object. The `TargetLoweringObjectFile` class is a part of the LLVM compiler infrastructure, and it is responsible for lowering the target-" LLVM,NVPTX,2027,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet without knowing the context in which it is being used. However, based on the variable names and the fact that they are all being set to `nullptr`, it is likely that this code is initializing or resetting the values of these variables. Without more information, it is not possible to determine the exact purpose of this code or what the next statement might be. If you have any additional context or information about the code, I would be happy to try and help you further." LLVM,NVPTX,2028,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `getExplicitSectionGlobal` method and the data structures being used. However, based on the code snippet provided, it is likely that the next statement will be a return statement that returns the `DataSection` object. The `getExplicitSectionGlobal` method appears to be a member function of a class that is derived from the `MCSection` class. The method takes three parameters: a `const GlobalObject *` pointer to a global object, a `SectionKind` enum value" LLVM,NVPTX,2029,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `getExplicitSectionGlobal` method and the data structures being used. However, based on the name of the method and the parameters it takes, it is likely that the next statement will be related to retrieving or creating a section of memory for the given global object. Here are a few possibilities for what the next statement could be: 1. The method will retrieve a pointer to the explicit section for the given global object and return it. 2. The method will create a new" LLVM,NVPTX,2030,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `MCSection` class and the `getSectionForConstant` method. However, based on the code snippet provided, it is likely that the next statement will be a call to the `getSectionForConstant` method, passing in the `Kind` and `C` parameters, and possibly also passing in the `Alignment` parameter. Here is an example of what the next statement might look like: ``` MCSection *section = getSectionForConstant(DL, Kind" LLVM,NVPTX,2031,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `MCSection` class and the `getSectionForConstant` method. However, based on the code snippet provided, it is likely that the next statement will be a call to the `getSectionForConstant` method, passing in the `Kind` and `C` parameters, and possibly also passing in the `Alignment` parameter. Here is an example of what the next statement might look like: ``` MCSection *section = getSectionForConstant(DL, Kind" LLVM,NVPTX,2032,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet without knowing the specific implementation of the `TargetLoweringObjectFile` class and the `Initialize` method. However, based on the naming conventions and the fact that the method is called `Initialize`, it is likely that the next statement will be related to the initialization of the object file, such as setting up the file header or allocating memory for the file contents." LLVM,NVPTX,2033,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `TargetObjectFile ( ) : TargetLoweringObjectFile ( ) {` This is a constructor for the `TargetObjectFile` class, which is a subclass of `TargetLoweringObjectFile`. The constructor initializes the `TargetObjectFile` object by calling the constructor of the `TargetLoweringObjectFile` class." LLVM,NVPTX,2034,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `TargetObjectFile ( ) : TargetLoweringObjectFile ( ) {` This is a constructor for the `TargetObjectFile` class, which is a subclass of `TargetLoweringObjectFile`. The constructor initializes the `TargetObjectFile` object by calling the constructor of the `TargetLoweringObjectFile` class." LLVM,NVPTX,2035,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `Section` class and the `getMetadata` method. However, based on the names of the variables and the syntax of the code, it appears that the next statement is likely to be a declaration of a new section for the DWARF debug information. Here is a possible next statement: ``` DwarfDebugSection = new Section(MCSection::SV_ELF, SectionKind::getMetadata()); ``` This statement would create" LLVM,NVPTX,2036,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the program and the data it is processing. However, based on the names of the variables and the types of the sections, it appears that this code is setting up sections for a linker or loader to use when creating an executable file. The `BSSSection`, `ReadOnlySection`, and `StaticCtorSection` variables are likely pointers to sections in the executable file that contain data for the program to use. The `StaticDtorSection` variable is likely a pointer to a section that" LLVM,NVPTX,2037,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific values of the variables and the behavior of the program. However, based on the names of the sections, it appears that this code is related to the generation of debug information for a program. The `StaticCtorSection` and `StaticDtorSection` are likely related to the initialization and finalization of static variables, while the `LSDASection` is related to the generation of language-specific data areas (LSDAs) for exception handling. The `EHFrameSection` is related to" LLVM,NVPTX,2038,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `MCSection` class and the `getSectionForConstant` method. However, based on the information provided, it is likely that the next statement will be a call to the `getSectionForConstant` method, passing in the `Kind`, `C`, `Align`, and `GO` parameters. Here is an example of what the next statement might look like: ``` MCSection * section = getSectionForConstant(Kind, C, Align, GO" LLVM,NVPTX,2039,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `MCSection` class and the `getSectionForConstant` method. However, based on the information provided, it is likely that the next statement will be a return statement that returns the `ReadOnlySection` object. The `getSectionForConstant` method is declared as a `const` method, which means that it does not modify the state of the object it is called on. It takes two parameters: `Kind`, which is a `SectionKind` enum value, and" LLVM,NVPTX,2040,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `Section` class and the `getDataRel`, `getBSS`, `getReadOnly`, `getMetadata`, and `getLSDA` methods. However, based on the names of the variables and methods, it is likely that the next statement will create a new section for the linker script, using the `MCSection` class and the `SectionKind` enum to specify the type of section and its properties." LLVM,NVPTX,2041,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `getExplicitSectionGlobal` method and the state of the `DataSection` object. However, based on the name of the method and the parameters it takes, it is likely that the next statement will be a return statement that returns the `DataSection` object. Here is a possible next statement: ``` return DataSection; ``` This statement would return the `DataSection` object, which is the explicit section that was requested by the caller. The `getExplicit" LLVM,NVPTX,2042,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be a `return` statement, as it is the last statement in the function and the function is expected to return a value. The `getSectionForConstant` function is declared as `const`, which means that it is not allowed to modify the state of the object it is called on. Therefore, it is likely that the function will return a value that is stored in the `ReadOnlySection` member variable, which is also declared as `const`. Without knowing the specific implementation of the `getSectionForConstant` function, it is not" LLVM,NVPTX,2043,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `Section` class and the `getMetadata` method. However, based on the names of the variables and the code structure, it is likely that the next statement will create a new `Section` object and assign it to the `DwarfRangesSection` variable. Here is a possible next statement: ``` DwarfRangesSection = new Section(MCSection::SV_ELF, SectionKind::getMetadata()); ```" LLVM,NVPTX,2044,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `TargetObjectFile` function and the context in which it is being called. However, based on the name of the function and the fact that it is being called with no arguments, it is likely that the next statement will be a call to the `TargetObjectFile` function, which will return a reference to a target object file." LLVM,NVPTX,2045,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `TargetObjectFile` function and the context in which it is being called. However, based on the name of the function and the fact that it is being called with no arguments, it is likely that the next statement will be a call to the `TargetObjectFile` function, which will return a reference to a target object file." LLVM,NVPTX,2046,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `delete` operator and the types of the objects being deleted. However, based on the names of the objects being deleted, it is likely that the next statement will be a call to the `delete` operator to delete the `DwarfDebugInfoSection` object." LLVM,NVPTX,2047,"The next statement in this code snippet is likely to be the deletion of the DwarfStrSection, which is the last section in the list of sections that are being deleted. Therefore, the next statement is likely to be: delete DwarfStrSection;" LLVM,NVPTX,2048,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it appears to be part of a larger program and the context is not provided. However, based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the next statement could be the creation of another section, possibly for debugging purposes. The code snippet creates several sections with different purposes, such as the read-only section, the static constructor section, the static destructor section, and the exception handling frame section. It also creates sections for debugging purposes, such as the DWARF abbreviation section, the DWARF information section, the" LLVM,NVPTX,2049,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `getSectionForConstant` method and the values of the `Kind` and `C` parameters. However, based on the name of the method and the parameters, it is likely that the next statement will involve retrieving or creating a section of the appropriate kind for the constant `C`. Here are a few possibilities for what the next statement could be: 1. `return getSectionForConstant(Kind, C);` - This would call the `getSectionForConstant" LLVM,NVPTX,2050,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `getExplicitSectionGlobal` method and the context in which it is called. However, based on the name of the method and the parameters it takes, it is likely that the next statement will be related to the retrieval of a section for the given global value, possibly using the `DataSection` object. Here are a few possibilities for what the next statement could be: 1. `return DataSection->getSection(GV, Kind, Mang, TM);` 2" LLVM,NVPTX,2051,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `getExplicitSectionGlobal` method and the context in which it is called. However, based on the name of the method and the parameters it takes, it is likely that the next statement will involve retrieving or creating a section of memory that is explicitly defined in the global value `GV`. The `Kind` parameter may be used to specify the type of section to retrieve or create, and the `Mang` and `TM` parameters may be used to perform name mangling or other transformations on" LLVM,NVPTX,2052,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `getSectionForConstant` method and the `SectionKind` enum. However, based on the code provided, it is likely that the next statement will be a return statement that returns a pointer to a `MCSection` object. The `getSectionForConstant` method is declared as a const method, which means that it does not modify the state of the object it is called on. It takes a `SectionKind` enum value as an argument, which is used to determine which" LLVM,NVPTX,2053,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `getSectionForConstant` method and the `SectionKind` enum. However, based on the code provided, it is likely that the next statement will be a return statement that returns a pointer to a `MCSection` object. The `getSectionForConstant` method is declared as a const method, which means that it does not modify the state of the object it is called on. It takes a `SectionKind` enum value as an argument, which is used to determine which" LLVM,NVPTX,2054,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the code and the input data. However, based on the names of the variables and the fact that they are all being set to `nullptr`, it is likely that this code is initializing a set of pointers to null values." LLVM,NVPTX,2055,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `PrintSwitchToSection` function and the values of the variables used in the statement. However, based on the syntax and the context of the code, it appears that the next statement is likely to be a call to the `PrintSwitchToSection` function, which is used to print a switch to a new section in the assembly code. The function takes several arguments, including a reference to the current streamer, the target triple, the output stream, and a subsection name. The statement is likely" LLVM,NVPTX,2056,"Based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the next statement will be: `OS << ;` This is because the previous statement is an `if` statement that checks if `isDwarfSection(FI, Section)` is true, and if so, it outputs the string literal `` to the output stream `OS`. If the `if` statement is not true, then the next statement will be executed, which is the `OS << ` statement." LLVM,NVPTX,2057,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `DwarfFiles` class and the `emplace_back` method. However, based on the syntax and the fact that `DwarfFiles` is a vector of `DwarfFile` objects, it is likely that the next statement will be a call to the `emplace_back` method of the `DwarfFiles` vector, passing in a new `DwarfFile` object as an argument." LLVM,NVPTX,2058,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `DwarfFiles` class and the `emplace_back` method. However, based on the syntax and the fact that `DwarfFiles` is a vector of `DwarfFile` objects, it is likely that the next statement will be a call to the `emplace_back` method of the `DwarfFiles` vector, passing in a new `DwarfFile` object as an argument." LLVM,NVPTX,2059,"This code snippet is creating a loop that iterates over a collection of data elements, and for each element, it is creating a string that represents the data in a specific format. The loop is controlled by the `NumChunks` variable, which is calculated based on the number of elements in the collection and the maximum length of each chunk. The loop starts by initializing a `SmallString` object with a size of `MaxLen`, and then creating a `raw_svector_ostream` object that writes to the `SmallString` object. The loop then iterates over the data elements, using" LLVM,NVPTX,2060,"The next statement after the given code snippet is: `return false;` Explanation: The code snippet is checking if the `Section` object is not null, and if it is not, it checks if the section is a text section or a writeable section. If the section is not a text section or a writeable section, the method returns `false`. Otherwise, it checks if the section is one of the DWARF sections (e.g. `.debug_info`, `.debug_abbrev`, etc.) and returns `true` if it is. If the section" LLVM,NVPTX,2061,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific inputs and the behavior of the `getKind` and `getDwarf*` methods. However, based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the function `isDwarfSection` is checking whether a given section is a DWARF section. If the section is not a DWARF section, the function returns `false`. Otherwise, it checks whether the section is one of the following DWARF sections: * `getDwarfAbbrevSection`" LLVM,NVPTX,2062,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `TargetStreamer` class and the `MCStreamer` class. However, based on the names of the classes and the fact that `TargetStreamer` is derived from `MCTargetStreamer`, it is likely that the next statement will be a call to the constructor of the `MCTargetStreamer` class, passing in the `MCStreamer` object `S` as an argument. Here is an example of what the next statement might look like: ```" LLVM,NVPTX,2063,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `TargetStreamer` class and the `MCStreamer` class. However, based on the names of the classes and the fact that `TargetStreamer` is derived from `MCTargetStreamer`, it is likely that the next statement will be a call to the constructor of the `MCTargetStreamer` class, passing in the `MCStreamer` object `S` as an argument. Here is an example of what the next statement might look like: ```" LLVM,NVPTX,2064,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `getStreamer().EmitRawText(S.data());` This statement is inside the `for` loop, which is executed for each element `S` in the `DwarfFiles` vector. The `getStreamer()` method is called to get the streamer object, and then the `EmitRawText()` method is called on the streamer object to emit the raw text data from the `S` string." LLVM,NVPTX,2065,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `DwarfFiles` class and the `OS` object. However, based on the code provided, it appears that the next statement will be: `OS << ;` This statement will append a string literal to the `OS` object, which is likely a stream or buffer of some kind. The string literal is not specified in the code snippet, so it is not possible to determine what it will be. It is also worth noting that" LLVM,NVPTX,2066,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific input and the behavior of the `isDwarfSection` and `outputDwarfFileDirectives` functions. However, based on the code provided, it is likely that the next statement will be: `Section -> PrintSwitchToSection ( * getStreamer ( ) . getContext ( ) . getAsmInfo ( ) , FI -> getTargetTriple ( ) , OS , SubSection ) ;` This is because the `if` statement that precedes this line checks whether" LLVM,NVPTX,2067,"Based on the code snippet provided, it appears to be a method for changing the section of an object file. The method takes in several parameters, including the current section, the new section, and an output stream. The method first asserts that the `SubSection` parameter is null, and then retrieves the `MCObjectFileInfo` object from the streamer's context. Next, the method checks if the current section is a DWARF section using the `isDwarfSection` method. If it is, the method outputs a string literal to the output stream." LLVM,NVPTX,2068,"The next statement in this code snippet is: `getStreamer().EmitRawText("""");`" LLVM,NVPTX,2069,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `outputDwarfFileDirectives` function and the contents of the `` string. However, based on the syntax and the context of the code, it is likely that the next statement will be a call to the `OS` object's `<<` operator, which is used to output the contents of the `` string to the output stream." LLVM,NVPTX,2070,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the code depends on various factors such as the input data, the environment in which the code is running, and the specific implementation of the `TargetStreamer` class. However, based on the name of the method `outputDwarfFileDirectives`, it is likely that the next statement will involve writing out some kind of debugging information in the DWARF format. This could include directives such as `.file`, `.line`, `.column`, and `.loc`, which are used to specify the source file" LLVM,NVPTX,2071,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the code depends on various factors such as the input data, the environment in which the code is running, and the specific implementation of the `TargetStreamer` class. However, based on the name of the method `outputDwarfFileDirectives`, it is likely that the next statement will involve writing out some kind of debugging information in the DWARF format. This could include directives such as `.file`, `.line`, `.column`, and `.loc`, which are used to specify the source file" LLVM,NVPTX,2072,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `Str.clear();`" LLVM,NVPTX,2073,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific input and the behavior of the `isDwarfSection` and `outputDwarfFileDirectives` functions. However, based on the code provided, it appears that the next statement will be: `Section -> PrintSwitchToSection ( * getStreamer ( ) . getContext ( ) . getAsmInfo ( ) , getStreamer ( ) . getContext ( ) . getTargetTriple ( ) , OS , SubSection ) ;` This statement is likely to print a" LLVM,NVPTX,2074,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the `closeLastSection` method depends on the implementation of the `TargetStreamer` class and the specific inputs and state of the object. However, based on the name of the method and the fact that it is a member of the `TargetStreamer` class, it is likely that this method is responsible for closing the last section of a target stream, which could involve flushing any remaining data to the stream and/or closing the stream itself. Without more information about the specific implementation of the" LLVM,NVPTX,2075,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `getStreamer().emitRawText("""");`" LLVM,NVPTX,2076,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `OS << Label;` Explanation: The code snippet is defining a function `emitRawBytes` that takes a `StringRef` argument `Data`. The function is emitting the raw bytes of the data as a series of chunks, with each chunk being a maximum of 8 bits long. The function is using a `raw_svector_ostream` to write the data to a string, and the `Label` variable is being used to store the name of the directive that is being used to emit the data. The next" LLVM,NVPTX,2077,"Based on the code snippet you provided, it appears to be related to assembly code generation. Specifically, it looks like it is generating a directive for a data section with a specific number of elements. The next statement of the code snippet is likely to be the body of the for loop, which is responsible for generating the actual data for the data section. The loop will iterate over the elements of the data array and generate the appropriate assembly code for each element. Without more context, it is difficult to provide a more specific answer. If you have any additional information or clarification about the code snippet, I would be" LLVM,NVPTX,2078,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `getStreamer().emitRawText(S);` This statement is inside the loop, so it will be executed repeatedly for each element in the `DwarfFiles` vector. It calls the `emitRawText()` method of the `getStreamer()` object, passing in the current element of the vector as an argument." LLVM,NVPTX,2079,"The next statement in the code snippet is: `getStreamer().emitRawText(S);` This statement is inside the `for` loop, and it is executed for each element `S` in the `DwarfFiles` vector. The `emitRawText()` method is called on the `getStreamer()` object, which is a streamer object that is used to output the DWARF file directives. The `S` parameter is the current element in the `DwarfFiles` vector, and it is passed as an argument to the `emitRawText()` method." LLVM,NVPTX,2080,"The next statement after the `if` statement is the `return` statement. The `return` statement will return the value of the `LT.first` field, which is a `SimpleTy` object, multiplied by the value of the `NUM_LIT` constant." LLVM,NVPTX,2081,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `getUnrollingPreferences` method and the input parameters. However, based on the name of the method and the parameters, it is likely that the next statement will involve retrieving or calculating some information related to loop unrolling, such as the number of iterations in the loop, the size of the loop body, or the desired unrolling factor. Some possible next statements could include: * `UP.DesiredTripCount = SE.getSmallConstantTripCount(" LLVM,NVPTX,2082,"The next statement in the code snippet is: `BaseT::BaseT(std::move(static_cast(Arg)));` This is a constructor call to the `BaseT` class, passing in the result of `std::move(static_cast(Arg))`. The `std::move` function is used to convert the argument `Arg` to an rvalue reference, which can be used to move the contents of `Arg` into the `BaseT` object. The `static_cast` is used to cast the `Arg` object to" LLVM,NVPTX,2083,"The next statement in the code snippet is: `BaseT::BaseT(std::move(static_cast(Arg)));` This is a constructor call to the `BaseT` class, passing in the result of `std::move(static_cast(Arg))`. The `std::move` function is used to convert the argument `Arg` to an rvalue reference, which can be used to move the contents of `Arg` into the `BaseT` object. The `static_cast` is used to cast the `Arg` object to" LLVM,NVPTX,2084,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be a comparison of the `IntrinsicID` of the `II` object with a specific value. The `` placeholder suggests that the comparison is being made with a string literal. Based on the context of the code snippet, it appears that the `readsLaneId` function is checking whether the `II` object represents an instruction that reads the lane ID of a SIMD vector. The `IntrinsicID` property of the `II` object is used to determine the type of instruction being represented. There" LLVM,NVPTX,2085,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the function `isLegalToVectorizeLoadChain` is not specified. However, based on the name of the function and the parameters it takes, it appears to be a function that determines whether a load chain is legal to vectorize. The function takes three parameters: * `ChainSizeInBytes`: the size of the load chain in bytes. * `Alignment`: the alignment of the load chain. * `AddrSpace`: the address space of the load chain. The" LLVM,NVPTX,2086,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the function and the input parameters. However, based on the name of the function and the parameters, it appears to be related to vectorization and memory alignment. Here are a few possibilities for the next statement: 1. The function checks if the chain size is a multiple of the alignment, and if not, it rounds up the chain size to the nearest multiple of the alignment. 2. The function checks if the address space is aligned with the alignment, and if not, it adjust" LLVM,NVPTX,2087,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the code depends on the specific values of the variables and the implementation of the functions called. However, based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the next statement will be a case statement that handles different values of the ISD variable. The ISD variable is set to the result of the TLI->InstructionOpcodeToISD function, which maps an opcode to an instruction set-specific opcode. The switch statement will then execute the code for the specific instruction set-specific opcode." LLVM,NVPTX,2088,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return BaseT::getArithmeticInstrCost(Opcode, Ty, CostKind, Opd1Info, Opd2Info, Opd1PropInfo, Opd2PropInfo);` This is because the `switch` statement has no `break` statements, so the execution will fall through to the next case, which is the `default` case. The `default` case returns the result of `BaseT::getArithmeticInstrCost`, which is the base class's implementation of the `getArithmeticInstrCost`" LLVM,NVPTX,2089,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `getPeelingPreferences` method and the input parameters. However, based on the name of the method and the parameters, it is likely that the next statement will involve calculating or retrieving some information related to loop peeling. Some possible next statements could include: * Calculating the number of iterations in the loop: `PP.setNumIterations(SE.getNumIterations(L));` * Calculating the number of iterations that can be peeled: `" LLVM,NVPTX,2090,"The `getRegisterBitWidth` function returns the bit width of a register of the specified kind. The `TargetTransformInfo` class is a part of the LLVM compiler infrastructure, and it provides information about the target architecture and its capabilities. The `RegisterKind` enum defines the different types of registers that can be used in the target architecture. The `K` parameter is an instance of this enum, and it specifies the kind of register for which the bit width is being requested. Therefore, the next statement of this code snippet is likely to be a `switch` statement that selects the appropriate" LLVM,NVPTX,2091,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `UP` class and the values of the `Partial` and `Runtime` properties. However, based on the syntax and the fact that the `UP` class is being used to create a new object, it is likely that the next statement will be an assignment or a method call on the newly created object. For example, it could be something like: ``` UP obj = new UP(); obj.Partial = true; obj.Runtime = true;" LLVM,NVPTX,2092,"The next statement after the `if` block will be `return None;`. The `if` block is checking if the `simplifyNvvmIntrinsic` function returns a non-null value. If it does, the function returns the value returned by `simplifyNvvmIntrinsic`. If it doesn't, the function returns `None`. So, if the `if` block is not executed, the function will return `None`." LLVM,NVPTX,2093,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the `SimplifyAction` function depends on the specific implementation of the `Special` and `FtzRequirement` classes, as well as the values of the `SpecialCase` and `FtzRequirementTy` parameters. However, based on the name of the function and the parameters it takes, it is likely that the function is intended to simplify a special case of a FtzRequirement, possibly by reducing it to a simpler form or by removing unnecessary parts. The function may also" LLVM,NVPTX,2094,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the `SimplifyAction` function depends on the specific implementation of the `Special` and `FtzRequirement` classes, as well as the values of the `SpecialCase` and `FtzRequirementTy` parameters. However, based on the name of the function and the parameters it takes, it is likely that the function is intended to simplify a special case of a FtzRequirement, possibly by reducing it to a simpler form or by removing unnecessary parts. The function may also" LLVM,NVPTX,2095,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be the initialization of the `ST` member variable, which is a pointer to the subtarget implementation for the target machine. The code snippet is likely to look like this: ``` explicit TTIImpl ( const TargetMachine * TM ) : BaseT ( TM ) , ST ( TM -> getSubtargetImpl ( ) ) , TLI ( ST -> getTargetLowering ( ) ) { // Initialize ST ST = TM -> getSubtargetImpl ( );" LLVM,NVPTX,2096,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be the initialization of the `ST` member variable, which is a pointer to the subtarget implementation for the target machine. The code snippet is likely to look like this: ``` explicit TTIImpl ( const TargetMachine * TM ) : BaseT ( TM ) , ST ( TM -> getSubtargetImpl ( ) ) , TLI ( ST -> getTargetLowering ( ) ) { // Initialize ST ST = TM -> getSubtargetImpl ( );" LLVM,NVPTX,2097,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the `SimplifyAction` function depends on the specific implementation of the `IID` and `FtzRequirement` classes, as well as any other code that may be executed by the function. However, based on the name of the function and the parameters it takes, it is likely that the function is intended to simplify an action by removing unnecessary requirements or constraints. The `IID` parameter is likely an identifier for the action being simplified, and the `FtzRequirement` parameter is" LLVM,NVPTX,2098,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the `SimplifyAction` function depends on the specific implementation of the `IID` and `FtzRequirement` classes, as well as any other code that may be executed by the function. However, based on the name of the function and the parameters it takes, it is likely that the function is intended to simplify an action by removing unnecessary requirements or constraints. The `IID` parameter is likely an identifier for the action being simplified, and the `FtzRequirement` parameter is" LLVM,NVPTX,2099,"Based on the code snippet you provided, it appears to be a switch statement that is handling different cases for floating-point instructions. The next statement in the code snippet is: case : return { Instruction :: FAdd , FTZ_Any } ; This case is handling the instruction for floating-point addition (FAdd) with the FTZ_Any flag set, which means that the flush-to-zero behavior is not required. The return statement is returning a pair of values, with the first value being the instruction and the second value being the flush-to" LLVM,NVPTX,2100,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it appears to be a part of a larger function and the context is not provided. However, based on the syntax and the information provided, it appears that the code is using the `switch` statement to handle different cases based on the value of `LT.second.SimpleTy`. In the first case, the code checks if `LT.second.SimpleTy` is equal to ``. If it is, the code returns a value of ` * LT.first`." LLVM,NVPTX,2101,"Based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the `getArithmeticInstrCost` function is being called with the `Opcode` and various other parameters. The function is returning a value based on the `ISD` value, which is determined by the `InstructionOpcodeToISD` function. The `switch` statement is checking the value of `ISD` and returning a value based on the specific case. The `default` case is returning a value from the `BaseT` class, while the other cases are returning a value based on the `Opcode` and other parameters." LLVM,NVPTX,2102,"Based on the code snippet you provided, it appears to be a part of a function that calculates the cost of an instruction. The function takes in an opcode and some other information, and returns a cost value. The code snippet you provided is a switch statement that checks the value of the `ISD` variable, which is set to the result of the `InstructionOpcodeToISD` function. The `InstructionOpcodeToISD` function appears to be a function that maps an instruction opcode to a specific instruction set (ISD). The switch statement has a default case that" LLVM,NVPTX,2103,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `if (Action.FtzRequirement != FTZ_Any) {` This is because the `switch` statement has been fully executed, and the `if` statement following it is now being evaluated. The `if` statement checks whether the `FtzRequirement` field of the `Action` struct is not equal to `FTZ_Any`, and if it is not, it executes the code inside the `if` block." LLVM,NVPTX,2104,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the `canHaveNonUndefGlobalInitializerInAddressSpace` function depends on the specific implementation of the `AddressSpace` class and the values of the `AS` parameter. However, based on the name of the function and the parameter name, it is likely that the function is checking whether a global initializer can be defined in a specific address space. If this is the case, the next statement of the code snippet is likely to be a check for the existence of a global initializer in the specified address" LLVM,NVPTX,2105,"The next statement of this code snippet is: return AS != AddressSpace::ADDRESS_SPACE_SHARED && AS != AddressSpace::ADDRESS_SPACE_LOCAL && AS != AddressSpace::ADDRESS_SPACE_PARAM;" LLVM,NVPTX,2106,"The next statement of this code snippet is: return new ImmutablePass(TM);" LLVM,NVPTX,2107,"The next statement after the `if` block is the `return` statement. The `return` statement will return the value of the `TargetTransformInfo` pointer, which is `this`." LLVM,NVPTX,2108,"The next statement of this code snippet is: AU.setPreservesAll();" LLVM,NVPTX,2109,"The next statement after the given code snippet is likely to be a call to the `TargetTransformInfo::getAnalysisUsage` method, which is a member function of the `TargetTransformInfo` class. This method is used to retrieve the analysis usage information for the target transform. Here is an example of how the `getAnalysisUsage` method might be called: ``` TargetTransformInfo *TTI = ...; // get a pointer to a TargetTransformInfo object // Call the getAnalysisUsage method to retrieve the analysis usage information AnalysisUsage AU = TTI->getAnal" LLVM,NVPTX,2110,"The next statement after the `if` statement is: `return TargetTransformInfo :: getArithmeticInstrCost ( Opcode , Ty , Opd1Info , Opd2Info , Opd1PropInfo , Opd2PropInfo ) ;` This statement returns the cost of the arithmetic instruction, which is a function of the opcode, type, and operand information." LLVM,NVPTX,2111,"Based on the code snippet you provided, it appears that the `ISD` variable is being used to determine the instruction opcode for the given `Opcode`. The `switch` statement is checking the value of `ISD` and returning a cost for the arithmetic instruction based on the opcode. The next statement in the code snippet is `case :`, which means that the code will execute the following block of code if the value of `ISD` is equal to the string literal """". Without knowing the specific values of the variables and the" LLVM,NVPTX,2112,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the `hasBranchDivergence` method depends on the specific implementation of the `TTI` class and the data it contains. However, based on the name of the method and the fact that it is declared as a `const` method, it is likely that the method does not modify the state of the `TTI` object and returns a boolean value indicating whether the branch has divergence. Therefore, the next statement of this code snippet is likely to be a statement that uses the return" LLVM,NVPTX,2113,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the `hasBranchDivergence` method depends on the specific implementation of the `TTI` class and the data it contains. However, based on the name of the method and the fact that it is declared as a `const` method, it is likely that the method does not modify the state of the `TTI` object and returns a boolean value indicating whether the branch has divergence. Therefore, the next statement of this code snippet is likely to be a statement that uses the return" LLVM,NVPTX,2114,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `popTTIStack ( this ) ;` This is because the `pushTTIStack` function is called with `this` as an argument, which means that the current object is being pushed onto the TTI stack. The next statement is likely to be `popTTIStack`, which will pop the top object off the TTI stack." LLVM,NVPTX,2115,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be the initialization of the `TTI` pass using the `initializeTTIPass` function. This function is called with the `PassRegistry` object as an argument, which is used to register the pass with the pass manager. Here's a breakdown of the code snippet: * `ISA_LIT` is a macro that expands to the name of the instruction set architecture (ISA) being targeted. * `TTI` is a class that inherits from the `ImmutablePass" LLVM,NVPTX,2116,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of a code snippet without knowing the context and the purpose of the code. However, based on the code snippet you provided, it appears to be a function that checks whether two functions are inline compatible. The function takes two parameters, `Caller` and `Callee`, which are both pointers to `Function` objects. The function then checks whether the two functions are compatible for inlining by comparing their attributes, such as their calling conventions, parameter lists, and return types. Without knowing the specific implementation of the function, it is difficult to predict the" LLVM,NVPTX,2117,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the value of `` is not specified. However, based on the syntax, it appears that the code is attempting to return a numerical literal value." LLVM,NVPTX,2118,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the value of `` is not specified. However, based on the syntax, it appears that the code is attempting to return a numerical literal value." LLVM,NVPTX,2119,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the `getNumberOfRegisters` function is not specified. However, based on the name of the function and the parameter it takes, it is likely that the function returns the number of registers in a vector or scalar register file, depending on the value of the `Vector` parameter." LLVM,NVPTX,2120,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the value of the `Vector` parameter and the implementation of the `getNumberOfRegisters` method. However, based on the name of the method and the parameter, it is likely that the method returns the number of registers in a vector register file. The `` placeholder suggests that the method returns a literal value, which could be a constant or a computed value based on the input parameters. Without more information about the specific implementation of the `getNumberOfRegisters` method" LLVM,NVPTX,2121,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the value of `` is not specified. However, based on the syntax, it appears that the code is attempting to return a numerical literal value." LLVM,NVPTX,2122,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the implementation of the `BaseT` class and the values of the `L` and `UP` variables. However, based on the syntax and the context of the code, it is likely that the next statement will be a call to a method or function that takes the `UP` variable as an argument. The method or function will likely use the values of the `Partial` and `Runtime` fields of the `UP` variable to determine the unrolling preferences for the loop. Without" LLVM,NVPTX,2123,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `UP.Partial = UP.Runtime = true;` This statement sets the `Partial` and `Runtime` fields of the `TTI::UnrollingPreferences` object `UP` to `true`." LLVM,NVPTX,2124,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the function `isLegalToVectorizeLoadChain` is not specified. However, based on the name of the function and the parameters it takes, it appears to be related to vectorization of load chains, which is a technique used in computer architecture to improve the performance of memory accesses. The function takes three parameters: * `ChainSizeInBytes`: the size of the load chain in bytes. * `Alignment`: the alignment of the load chain. * `AddrSpace`:" LLVM,NVPTX,2125,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return isLegalToVectorizeLoadChain(ChainSizeInBytes, Alignment, AddrSpace);` This statement returns the result of the `isLegalToVectorizeLoadChain` function, which is called with the same arguments as the `isLegalToVectorizeStoreChain` function. The `isLegalToVectorizeLoadChain` function is not shown in the code snippet, but it is likely to be a function that checks whether a load chain with the given size, alignment, and address space is legal to vectorize." LLVM,NVPTX,2126,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet without knowing the specific implementation of the `isLegalToVectorizeStoreChain` function. However, based on the name of the function and the parameters it takes, it appears to be related to vectorization and memory alignment. Given that the function takes a `ChainSizeInBytes` parameter, it is likely that the function is checking whether a store chain of a certain size is legal to vectorize. The `Alignment` parameter may indicate the alignment of the store chain, and the `AddrSpace` parameter may indicate the address space in which the" LLVM,NVPTX,2127,"Based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the function `isNVVMAtomic` is checking whether a given `IntrinsicInst` is atomic or not. The function is checking the intrinsic ID of the `IntrinsicInst` and returning `false` for all cases except for two specific intrinsic IDs, which are represented by `` placeholders. Without knowing the specific intrinsic IDs being checked, it is not possible to predict the next statement of the code snippet. However, based on the context of the code, it is likely that the next statement" LLVM,NVPTX,2128,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `memcpy(encoded, temp64.a, sizeof(temp64.a));` Explanation: The code snippet defines a union called `temp64` that contains two members: `x` of type `uint64_t`, and `a` of type `char[]`. The union is used to store a 64-bit unsigned integer in `x`, and then copy the bytes of the integer into the `a` array. The `for` loop iterates over the" LLVM,NVPTX,2129,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific values of the variables and the behavior of the program. However, based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the program is attempting to perform some kind of data encoding or encryption. The first `assert` statement checks that the return value `retval` is equal to a specific value `` and that a string literal `` is not empty. The second `assert` statement checks that the number of bytes `nbytes` is less than or equal to a specific" LLVM,NVPTX,2130,"The next statement after the `std::lock_guard` declaration is the `annotationCache->erase(Mod)` statement. This statement is likely to be executed after the `std::lock_guard` object is destroyed, which is when the mutex is unlocked. The `annotationCache->erase(Mod)` statement is likely to be used to remove the `Mod` object from the `annotationCache` map, which is a container that stores the annotations for the current module. The `erase` method is used to remove an element from the map, and it takes the key of the element to" LLVM,NVPTX,2131,"The next statement after the `if` statement would be the statement inside the `if` block, which is: ``` cacheAnnotationFromMD(m, gv); ```" LLVM,NVPTX,2132,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return false;` This is because the `else if` block is executed only if the `find` method of the `annotationCache` vector at index `m` returns `end()`, which means that the `gv` annotation is not found in the cache. If the `gv` annotation is not found in the cache, then the `cacheAnnotationFromMD` function is called to cache the annotation. After caching the annotation, the function returns `false` to indicate that the annotation was not found in the cache." LLVM,NVPTX,2133,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the `getMaxNReg` function is not specified. However, based on the name of the function and the parameters it takes, it is likely that the function returns the maximum value of a register in the `Function` object `F` and stores the result in the `unsigned` variable `x`." LLVM,NVPTX,2134,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the implementation of the `findOneNVVMAnnotation` function and the specific inputs provided to the function. However, based on the name of the function and the parameters passed to it, it is likely that the function is searching for a specific annotation in the provided input string. Assuming that the function is implemented correctly and the input string is well-formed, the next statement of the code snippet is likely to be the return value of the `findOneNVVMAnnotation` function, which is" LLVM,NVPTX,2135,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be the return statement, which returns the value of the `findOneNVVMAnnotation` function. The `findOneNVVMAnnotation` function is called with the address of the `F` function and the string literal ``, and the result is stored in the `x` variable. The `getMaxNTIDx` function then returns the value of the `findOneNVVMAnnotation` function, which is a boolean value indicating whether the annotation was found or not." LLVM,NVPTX,2136,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the implementation of the `findOneNVVMAnnotation` function and the values of the variables `F`, ``, and `y`. However, based on the name of the function and the parameters passed to it, it is likely that the function is searching for a specific annotation in a data structure or file. The next statement of the code snippet is likely to be the result of the search, which could be a reference to the annotation or a flag indicating whether the annotation was found or not." LLVM,NVPTX,2137,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `findOneNVVMAnnotation` function and the data stored in the `Function` object. However, based on the name of the function and the parameters passed to it, it is likely that the next statement will be a call to `findOneNVVMAnnotation` with the same parameters, but with a different string literal as the second argument. This is because the function appears to be searching for a specific annotation in the `Function` object, and the string literal passed to" LLVM,NVPTX,2138,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the implementation of the `findOneNVVMAnnotation` function and the specific inputs provided to the function. However, based on the name of the function and the parameters passed to it, it is likely that the function is searching for a specific annotation in the provided input string. Assuming that the function is implemented correctly and the input string is well-formed, the next statement of the code snippet is likely to be the return value of the `findOneNVVMAnnotation` function, which is" LLVM,NVPTX,2139,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be: `return findOneNVVMAnnotation(&F, , x);` This is because the `getMinCTASm` function is defined to return a `bool` value, and the `findOneNVVMAnnotation` function is called with the address of the `Function` object `F` and the string literal `` as arguments. The `x` variable is also passed as an argument to `findOneNVVMAnnotation`, but it is not used in" LLVM,NVPTX,2140,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the function `getReqNTIDx` is not specified. However, based on the name of the function and the parameters it takes, it appears to be a function that retrieves a required NTID (whatever that may be) for a given function `F`. The function takes a reference to a `Function` object and a reference to an `unsigned` variable, and it returns a `bool` value indicating whether the required NTID was found or not. Without knowing the implementation of" LLVM,NVPTX,2141,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the function `getReqNTIDx` is not specified. However, based on the name of the function and the parameters it takes, it appears to be a function that retrieves a required NTID (whatever that may be) for a given function `F`. The function takes a reference to a `Function` object and a reference to an `unsigned` variable, and it returns a `bool` value indicating whether the required NTID was found or not. Without knowing the implementation of" LLVM,NVPTX,2142,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the implementation of the `findOneNVVMAnnotation` function and the values of the variables `F`, ``, and `y`. However, based on the name of the function and the parameters passed to it, it is likely that the function is searching for a specific annotation in a data structure or file. The next statement of the code snippet is likely to be the result of the search, which could be a reference to the annotation or a flag indicating whether the annotation was found or not." LLVM,NVPTX,2143,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `findOneNVVMAnnotation` function and the values of the variables `F`, ``, and `z`. However, based on the syntax and the fact that the function is being called with a pointer to the `F` variable and a string literal, it is likely that the next statement will be a call to the `findOneNVVMAnnotation` function with the `F` variable as the first argument, the string literal as the second argument" LLVM,NVPTX,2144,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `findOneNVVMAnnotation` function and the values of the variables `F`, ``, and `z`. However, based on the syntax and the fact that the function is being called with a pointer to the `F` variable and a string literal, it is likely that the next statement will be a call to the `findOneNVVMAnnotation` function with the `F` variable as the first argument, the string literal as the second argument" LLVM,NVPTX,2145,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the code depends on the input data and the specific implementation of the `getSamplerName` function. However, based on the name of the function and the fact that it takes a `const Value &` parameter, it is likely that the function returns a string that represents the name of a sampler." LLVM,NVPTX,2146,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be a call to the `hasName()` method of the `val` object, with the string literal `` as an argument. Here's a breakdown of the code snippet: * `assert`: This is a keyword in Python that is used to assert that a certain condition is true. * `(val.hasName() && )`: This is the condition that is being asserted. It is a boolean expression that consists of two parts: + `val.hasName()`: This" LLVM,NVPTX,2147,"The next statement after the `assert` statement is the `return` statement. The `assert` statement checks if the `val` object has a name and if the string literal is not empty. If the assertion fails, the program will terminate with an error message. If the assertion succeeds, the `return` statement will return the name of the `val` object as a string." LLVM,NVPTX,2148,"The next statement after the code snippet you provided is: `return std::string(val.getName());` This statement is returning a `std::string` object that contains the name of the `val` object. The `getName()` method is being called on the `val` object to retrieve the name, and the `std::string` constructor is being used to create a new `std::string` object from the returned name." LLVM,NVPTX,2149,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the `isImage` function depends on the implementation of the `Value` class and the specific input data. However, based on the name of the function and the parameter it takes, it is likely that the function is intended to determine whether a given `Value` object represents an image. Without more information about the implementation of the `Value` class and the specific input data, it is not possible to make a more specific prediction about the behavior of the `isImage` function." LLVM,NVPTX,2150,"The next statement after the code snippet you provided is: `return isImageReadOnly ( val ) || isImageWriteOnly ( val ) || isImageReadWrite ( val ) ;` This statement is a return statement that returns a boolean value indicating whether the image is read-only, write-only, or read-write. The `isImageReadOnly`, `isImageWriteOnly`, and `isImageReadWrite` functions are called on the `val` variable, which is assumed to be an image object. If any of these functions return `true`, the overall result of the expression will be" LLVM,NVPTX,2151,"The next statement after the `if` statement is the `return false` statement. The `if` statement checks if the `findAllNVVMAnnotation` function returns a non-zero value, which indicates that the annotation is present in the function. If the annotation is present, the `is_contained` function is called to check if the argument number is contained in the annotation. If the argument number is contained in the annotation, the function returns `true`. If the `findAllNVVMAnnotation` function returns 0, indicating that the annotation is not present in" LLVM,NVPTX,2152,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `const Function * func = arg->getParent();` This line retrieves the parent function of the argument `arg`. The `getParent()` method is called on the `arg` object, which is a `const Argument *` pointer. The return value of this method is a `const Function *` pointer, which is assigned to the `func` variable." LLVM,NVPTX,2153,"It's difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the context in which the code is being executed. However, based on the syntax and the fact that the code is using the `const Function *` type, it's likely that the next statement will be a call to a member function of the `Function` class, such as `func->getParent()` or `func->getAnnotations()`." LLVM,NVPTX,2154,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return false;` Explanation: The `isImageReadWrite` function takes a `const Value &` parameter and returns a `bool`. The function checks if the value is an argument of a function, and if it is, it checks if the function has a specific annotation. If the annotation is found and the argument number is contained in the annotation, the function returns `true`. If the annotation is not found or the argument number is not contained in the annotation, the function returns `false`. In this code snippet, we have already" LLVM,NVPTX,2155,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the `isImageWriteOnly` function depends on the implementation of the `Value` class and the specific values that are passed to the function. However, based on the name of the function and the fact that it takes a `const Value&` parameter, it is likely that the function will check whether the `Value` object is write-only, meaning that it can be written to but not read from. Here is a possible next statement for the code snippet: ``` if (val.isWriteOnly" LLVM,NVPTX,2156,"The next statement of the code snippet is: `return (x == );` This statement is a comparison between the value of `x` and a numeric literal. If the values are equal, the function will return `true`, otherwise it will return `false`." LLVM,NVPTX,2157,"The next statement after the `if` statement in the code snippet you provided is the `assert` statement. The `assert` statement is used to check if a condition is true, and if it is not, it will throw an `AssertionError`. In this case, the condition being checked is `(annot == ) && `. If this condition is not true, an `AssertionError` will be thrown. It's worth noting that the `assert` statement is typically used for debugging purposes, and it is not recommended to use it in" LLVM,NVPTX,2158,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `const Function * func = arg->getParent();` This statement retrieves the parent function of the argument `arg`. The `getParent()` method is called on the `arg` object, which returns a pointer to the function that contains the argument. The returned pointer is then stored in the `func` variable." LLVM,NVPTX,2159,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `const Function * func = arg->getParent();` This line of code is inside the `if` statement that checks if `arg` is a `Argument` object, and it retrieves the parent function of the argument." LLVM,NVPTX,2160,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the `dyn_cast` function and the value of the `annot` variable are not specified. However, based on the information provided, it is likely that the next statement after the `if` statement will be the assignment of the `annot` variable, as the `if` statement is checking whether the `val` object is a `GlobalValue` object, and if it is, it will assign the value of the `annot` variable to the `gv` variable. Therefore," LLVM,NVPTX,2161,"The next statement after the `if` statement is the `assert` statement. The `assert` statement is used to check that a certain condition is true. In this case, the condition is that the `annot` variable is equal to the `` value and the `` string. If the condition is not true, the `assert` statement will cause the program to abort with an error message. Therefore, the next statement after the `if` statement is the `assert` statement, which checks that the `annot` variable is equal to the ``). Therefore, the next statement of this code snippet is likely to be the return statement that returns the parent of the instruction, which is `I -> getParent ( )`." LLVM,NVPTX,2177,"The next statement of this code snippet is: return ;" LLVM,NVPTX,2178,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return B->getParent();` Explanation: The code snippet is checking the type of the value `v` using `dyn_cast`. If `v` is a `Function`, it returns the function. If `v` is an `Instruction`, it returns the parent of the instruction's parent. If `v` is a `BasicBlock`, it returns the parent of the basic block. Since the code snippet is checking the type of `v` and returning the appropriate value based on the type, the next statement" LLVM,NVPTX,2179,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `getReqNTIDx` function and the input function `F`. However, based on the name of the function and the parameters it takes, it is likely that this function is trying to retrieve the required NTID (Native Thread ID) for the specified function `F`. The `x` parameter is likely an output parameter that will be set to the required NTID. Without more information about the specific implementation of this function, it is not possible to predict" LLVM,NVPTX,2180,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be the assignment of the return value of the `llvm::findOneNVVMAnnotation` function to the variable `y`. Here's a breakdown of the code snippet: * `llvm::findOneNVVMAnnotation` is a function that takes a pointer to a `llvm::Function` object, a string representing the name of the annotation to search for, and a pointer to a `llvm::Value` object. * The function returns a pointer to a `llvm::Value` object if" LLVM,NVPTX,2181,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the `getReqNTIDy` function is not specified. However, based on the name of the function and the parameters it takes, it appears to be related to the LLVM compiler infrastructure and may be used to retrieve the requested number of threads for a given function. Without more information about the context in which this code snippet is being used, it is difficult to provide a more specific answer. If you have any additional details or context, I would be happy to try and help you further." LLVM,NVPTX,2182,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the `getReqNTIDz` function is dependent on the implementation of the `Function` class and the specific input parameters. However, based on the name of the function and the parameters it takes, it is likely that the function is trying to retrieve the required number of threads (NTID) for a given function (F) and store it in the variable `z`. The function may also return a boolean value indicating whether the required number of threads was successfully retrieved. Without knowing the specific implementation" LLVM,NVPTX,2183,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the `getReqNTIDz` function is dependent on the implementation of the `Function` class and the specific input parameters. However, based on the name of the function and the parameters it takes, it is likely that the function is trying to retrieve the required number of threads (NTID) for a given function (F) and store it in the variable `z`. The function may also return a boolean value indicating whether the required number of threads was successfully retrieved. Without knowing the specific implementation" LLVM,NVPTX,2184,"The next statement after the given code snippet is: `return llvm::isImageReadOnly(val) || llvm::isImageWriteOnly(val);` This statement is a logical OR operation that checks if the image is read-only or write-only. If the image is read-only or write-only, the function returns `true`, otherwise it returns `false`." LLVM,NVPTX,2185,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be: `if (func->hasReadOnlyAttr()) {` This is because the `getParent()` method returns the parent function of the `Argument` object, and the `hasReadOnlyAttr()` method checks if the function has the `readonly` attribute. If the function has the `readonly` attribute, then it is likely that the image is read-only." LLVM,NVPTX,2186,"The next statement after the `if` block is: `return false;` This is because if the `if` condition is not met, the function will return `false`." LLVM,NVPTX,2187,The next statement after the `if` statement in the code snippet is `return true;`. LLVM,NVPTX,2188,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return true;`" LLVM,NVPTX,2189,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty because it depends on the specific values of the variables and the behavior of the functions called. However, based on the context and the names of the variables and functions, it is likely that the next statement will be a return statement, possibly returning a boolean value indicating whether the value passed to the `isSurface` function is a surface or not." LLVM,NVPTX,2190,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return true;` Explanation: The code snippet is checking if the `val` object is a `GlobalValue` and if it has a specific annotation. If the annotation is found, the code snippet asserts that the annotation value is equal to a specific number and a specific string. If the assertion is true, the code snippet returns `true`. If the assertion is false, the code snippet does not return anything, which means it will continue executing the next statement. Therefore, the next statement of this code snippet is `return" LLVM,NVPTX,2191,"Based on the code snippet you provided, it appears to be a function that is searching for a specific metadata node in a module and then caching the annotations associated with it. The next statement of the code snippet is: `if (tmp.empty()) return;` This statement checks if the `tmp` variable, which is a `key_val_pair_t` object, is empty. If it is empty, the function returns. Otherwise, the function continues to the next statement." LLVM,NVPTX,2192,"The next statement after the `else` block is: `( * annotationCache ) [ m ] [ gv ] = std :: move ( tmp1 ) ;` This statement is assigning the value of `tmp1` to the element at position `m` in the `annotationCache` map, using the `gv` key." LLVM,NVPTX,2193,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `const Annotation * ann = m->getAnnotation(prop);`" LLVM,NVPTX,2194,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific values of the variables and the behavior of the functions being called. However, based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the next statement will be: retval = ( * annotationCache ) [ m ] [ gv ] [ prop ] [ ] ; This statement is assigning a value to the variable ""retval"" based on the value of the ""prop"" property of the object stored in the ""annotationCache"" array at the index ""m"" and ""g" LLVM,NVPTX,2195,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return false;` Explanation: The code snippet is checking if the return value of a function is not equal to 0. If it is not equal to 0, it means that the function has returned a non-zero value, which means that the function has succeeded. In this case, the code will continue executing the next statement, which is the `for` loop. However, if the return value is equal to 0, it means that the function has failed. In this case, the code will return `false`, which" LLVM,NVPTX,2196,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be a call to the `hasName()` method of the `val` object, with the string literal `` as an argument. Here's a breakdown of the code snippet: * `assert`: This is a keyword in Python that is used to assert that a certain condition is true. * `(val.hasName() && )`: This is the condition that is being asserted. It is a boolean expression that consists of two parts: + `val.hasName()`: This" LLVM,NVPTX,2197,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return val.getName();`" LLVM,NVPTX,2198,"The next statement after the `assert` statement is the `return` statement. The `assert` statement checks that the `val` object has a name and that the name is equal to the string literal ``. If the assertion fails, the `assert` statement will throw an exception. If the assertion succeeds, the `return` statement will return the name of the `val` object." LLVM,NVPTX,2199,"Based on the code snippet you provided, it appears to be a part of a function that is parsing metadata from a module and storing it in a cache. The code is using the LLVM API to access the metadata and values in the module. The next statement of the code snippet you provided is: `if ( tmp.empty() ) return;` This statement checks if the `tmp` vector is empty, and if it is, the function returns. The `tmp` vector is used to store the metadata for a particular global value, and if it is empty, it means that there is no metadata" LLVM,NVPTX,2200,"Based on the code snippet you provided, it appears that the next statement will be: `( * annotationCache ) [ m ] [ gv ] = tmp ;` This is because the code is currently inside a loop that iterates over the operands of a metadata node, and it is checking if the current operand is equal to the global variable `gv`. If the current operand is not equal to `gv`, then the loop will continue to the next iteration. If the current operand is equal to `gv`, then the code will cache the annotation from the metadata node in the" LLVM,NVPTX,2201,"The code snippet is a loop that iterates over the operands of a node called `alignNode`. It checks each operand to see if it is a `ConstantInt` and if it is, it extracts the value of the `ConstantInt` and performs some bitwise operations on it. The loop starts by initializing two variables: `i` is set to `` and `n` is set to the number of operands of `alignNode`. The loop then iterates over the operands of `alignNode`, starting from `i` and ending at `n" LLVM,NVPTX,2202,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return true;` Explanation: The `isBarrierIntrinsic` function takes a string literal `id` as an argument and checks if it matches any of the given string literals. If it does, the function returns `true`, otherwise it returns `false`. In this code snippet, the `id` argument is being compared to five different string literals using the `==` operator. If any of the comparisons are true, the function will return `true`. If none of the comparisons are true, the function" LLVM,NVPTX,2203,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return (x == );` This statement is executed if the `if` condition is not met, i.e., if `F.getCallingConv()` does not return `llvm::CallingConv::PTX_Kernel`. In this case, the function returns `false`." LLVM,NVPTX,2204,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return false;` Explanation: The code snippet is checking if the function `F` is a kernel function by looking for a specific annotation in the function's metadata. If the annotation is not found, the code checks the calling convention of the function to see if it is a PTX kernel. If it is not a PTX kernel, the function returns `false`." LLVM,NVPTX,2205,"The next statement after the given code snippet is: `return false;` The code snippet is checking if the value of `id` is equal to any of the string literals, and if it is, it returns `true`. If the value of `id` is not equal to any of the string literals, it returns `false`." LLVM,NVPTX,2206,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `const AnnotationDescriptor * ad = (*annotationCache)[m][gv];` This statement retrieves the `AnnotationDescriptor` object for the given `GlobalValue` object `gv` and `Module` object `m` from the `annotationCache` map. The `AnnotationDescriptor` object contains information about the annotations for the `GlobalValue` object." LLVM,NVPTX,2207,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `cacheAnnotationFromMD` function and the data stored in the `annotationCache` object. However, based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the `cacheAnnotationFromMD` function is called to cache an annotation from the metadata (MD) of a given method (m) and a given generic value (gv). If the `cacheAnnotationFromMD` function is successful in caching the annotation, it is likely that the next statement of the code snippet will be the `return`" LLVM,NVPTX,2208,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `MutexGuard` class and the `getParent` method. However, based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the next statement will be: `retval = ( * annotationCache ) [ m ] [ gv ] [ prop ] [ ] ;` This statement is assigning a value to the `retval` variable based on the value of the `prop` variable and the contents of the `annotationCache` map. The" LLVM,NVPTX,2209,"The next statement after the `else if` block will be the `cacheAnnotationFromMD` function call, which is the last statement in the `if` block. So, the next statement will be: ``` cacheAnnotationFromMD(m, gv); ```" LLVM,NVPTX,2210,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return false;` Explanation: The code snippet is checking if the function `func` has a specific annotation, and if it does, it checks if the argument number of the current argument `arg` is contained in the annotation. If the annotation is not found or the argument number is not contained in the annotation, the function returns `false`. Therefore, the next statement of the code snippet is `return false;`." LLVM,NVPTX,2211,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return false;` Explanation: The code snippet is checking if the function `func` has a specific annotation, and if it does, it checks if the argument `arg` is contained in the annotation. If the argument is not contained in the annotation, the function returns `false`. If the argument is contained in the annotation, the function returns `true`. So, the next statement of this code snippet is `return false;`, which will be executed if the argument is not contained in the annotation." LLVM,NVPTX,2212,"It's difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the context in which the code is being executed. However, based on the syntax and the fact that the code is using the `const Function *` type, it's likely that the next statement will be a call to a member function of the `Function` class, such as `func->getParent()` or `func->getAnnotations()`." LLVM,NVPTX,2213,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `const Function * func = arg->getParent();` This statement retrieves the parent function of the argument `arg`. The `getParent()` method is called on the `arg` object, which is a `const Argument *` pointer, and the result is stored in the `func` variable, which is a `const Function *` pointer." LLVM,NVPTX,2214,"Based on the code snippet you provided, it is difficult to predict the next statement with certainty. However, based on the context and the structure of the code, it is likely that the next statement will be related to the processing of the `entity` variable, which is a `Value` object obtained from the `elem` variable. One possible next statement could be: ``` tmp.push_back(entity); ``` This statement would add the `entity` object to the `tmp` vector, which is likely to be used later in the code to store the values of the operands of the" LLVM,NVPTX,2215,"Based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the next statement will be: `( * annotationCache ) [ m ] [ gv ] = std :: move ( tmp ) ;` This is because the previous statement, `if ( ( * annotationCache ) . find ( m ) != ( * annotationCache ) . end ( ) )`, checks if the key `m` exists in the `annotationCache` map. If it does not exist, the code will continue to the next iteration of the loop. However, if the key `m` does exist, the code will execute the statement `( *" LLVM,NVPTX,2216,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be: `align = alignNode->getConstantAsInt();`. This is because the `getMDNode()` method is being called on the `CallInst` object `I`, and the result is being stored in a variable called `alignNode`. The `getMDNode()` method is used to retrieve the metadata node associated with a particular instruction, and in this case, it is being used to retrieve the metadata node for the alignment of the instruction. The `alignNode` variable is then being used to get the constant value of the alignment as an" LLVM,NVPTX,2217,"The code snippet you provided is incomplete, so I cannot predict the next statement with certainty. However, based on the context, it appears that the code is trying to retrieve the alignment value for a specific index in a metadata node. If the code is trying to retrieve the alignment value for the `index`th operand in the `alignNode` metadata node, then the next statement is likely to be: ``` align = v >> ; ``` This statement would assign the alignment value for the `index`th operand to the `align` variable." LLVM,NVPTX,2218,"Based on the code snippet provided, it is difficult to predict the next statement with certainty. However, we can make an educated guess based on the information provided. The code snippet appears to be a loop that iterates over the operands of a metadata object. The loop starts at the second operand (since the first operand is accessed outside the loop) and iterates until the end of the operands. The loop body is not provided, so we cannot determine what the next statement will be. However, based on the information provided, it is likely that the next statement will be a call to the" LLVM,NVPTX,2219,"The next statement of this code snippet is: retval[keyname].push_back(Val->getZExtValue());" LLVM,NVPTX,2220,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `V = GEP -> getPointerOperand() -> stripPointerCasts(); continue;` This statement is executed if the `V` variable is a `GEPOperator` object. It gets the pointer operand of the `GEPOperator` object and strips any pointer casts from it, then continues to the next iteration of the loop." LLVM,NVPTX,2221,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `const Value * common = ;` This line is declaring a new variable `common` of type `const Value *` and initializing it to ``, which is a placeholder value. The purpose of this variable is to store the common base value of all the incoming values of the PHINode `PN`." LLVM,NVPTX,2222,"The next statement of this code snippet is: ( * annotationCache ) [ m ] [ gv ] = std :: move ( tmp ) ; Explanation: The code snippet is checking if the `tmp` vector is empty, and if it is not, it is assigning the contents of `tmp` to `annotationCache[m][gv]`. If `tmp` is empty, then the code snippet will create a new `global_val_annot_t` object called `tmp1`, and assign the contents of `tmp` to `tmp1[gv]`." LLVM,NVPTX,2223,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `BasicBlock * BB = getBasicBlock ( F , blockName ) ;` This statement retrieves the basic block with the given name from the function `F`. The `getBasicBlock` function is a member of the `Function` class in LLVM, and it takes two arguments: the first is the function itself, and the second is the name of the basic block to retrieve. The function returns a pointer to the basic block, which is then stored in the variable `BB`." LLVM,NVPTX,2224,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the `getParentFunction` function is not specified. However, based on the name of the function, it is likely that it returns a pointer to the parent function of the current function, or `NULL` if there is no parent function. If the `getParentFunction` function returns a non-null pointer, the next statement will be executed. If it returns `NULL`, the `if` statement will be skipped and the function will return." LLVM,NVPTX,2225,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the implementation of the `getInst` function and the values of the `base` and `instName` variables. However, based on the name of the function and the parameters it takes, it is likely that the function returns a pointer to an instruction object that corresponds to the specified instruction name and base address. Therefore, the next statement of this code snippet is likely to be a statement that uses the returned instruction pointer to perform some operation, such as executing the instruction or retrieving information about the instruction." LLVM,NVPTX,2226,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `if (I) {`" LLVM,NVPTX,2227,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `visited.insert(v);`" LLVM,NVPTX,2228,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the program depends on the specific values of the variables `v` and `visited`, as well as the implementation of the function `dumpInstRec`. However, based on the name of the function `dumpInstRec`, it is likely that the function is responsible for dumping the contents of a data structure, and the statement `dumpInstRec ( v , & visited )` is likely to be a call to this function, passing the address of the variable `v` and the address of the `visited" LLVM,NVPTX,2229,"The next statement in the code snippet is: `F->getParent()->dump();`" LLVM,NVPTX,2230,"The next statement after the `else if` block will be the `cacheAnnotationFromMD` function call, which is the last statement in the `if` block. So, the next statement will be: ``` cacheAnnotationFromMD(m, gv); ```" LLVM,NVPTX,2231,"Based on the code snippet you provided, it appears that the next statement will be: retval = ( * annotationCache ) [ m ] [ gv ] [ prop ] [ ] ; This statement is assigning a value to the variable `retval` based on the value of the `prop` property in the `annotationCache` map. The value being assigned is the value of the `prop` property in the `annotationCache` map for the key `m` and the value of the `gv` variable. It's worth noting that the code" LLVM,NVPTX,2232,"The next statement of this code snippet is: retval = ( * annotationCache ) [ m ] [ gv ] [ prop ] [ ] ; This statement assigns the value of the property ""prop"" of the annotation cache for the module ""m"" and the global value ""gv"" to the variable ""retval"". The value is retrieved from the annotation cache using the key ""prop"" and the index ." LLVM,NVPTX,2233,"Based on the code snippet you provided, it appears that the next statement after the `if` statement would be the `return false` statement. Here's why: The `if` statement checks whether the value of `v` (which is extracted from the `ConstantInt` object) is greater than or equal to `index`. If it is, then the `align` variable is set to the value of `v` shifted right by `NUM_LIT` bits, and the function returns `true`. If the value of `v` is less than `index`, then" LLVM,NVPTX,2234,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `Instruction *I = &*it;` This statement assigns the address of the current instruction to the variable `I`. The `&*` operator is used to get the address of the instruction, and the `*` operator is used to dereference the iterator `it` to get the instruction itself." LLVM,NVPTX,2235,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be the assignment of the value returned by the `llvm::findOneNVVMAnnotation` function to the variable `x`. The `llvm::findOneNVVMAnnotation` function is used to find a specific annotation in the LLVM IR code. The first argument to the function is a pointer to the LLVM IR function, and the second argument is the name of the annotation to search for. In this case, the annotation being searched for is `llvm::PropertyAnnotationNames[llvm::PROPERTY_MAXNT" LLVM,NVPTX,2236,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be the evaluation of the `llvm::findOneNVVMAnnotation` function with the `llvm::PropertyAnnotationNames[llvm::PROPERTY_MAXNTID_Y]` argument, which is an array of strings that represent the names of the properties that can be used to annotate a function in the NVVM IR. The `llvm::findOneNVVMAnnotation` function takes a function pointer and a string as input, and returns a pointer to the first annotation that matches the given string. In this case" LLVM,NVPTX,2237,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the `getMaxNTIDy` function is not specified. However, based on the name of the function and the parameters it takes, it is likely that the function is intended to retrieve the maximum number of threads in the y dimension for the given function `F`. Assuming that the function is implemented correctly, the next statement of the code snippet would likely be a call to the `getMaxNTIDy` function, passing in the `F` function and the `y` variable as arguments. The function" LLVM,NVPTX,2238,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the `getMaxNTIDz` function is not specified. However, based on the name of the function and the parameters it takes, it is likely that the function is used to determine the maximum number of threads that can be used for a given function. The `F` parameter is likely a reference to a `Function` object, which represents a function in the LLVM IR. The `z` parameter is likely a reference to an `unsigned` integer, which will be used to store the maximum number of" LLVM,NVPTX,2239,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be the assignment of the value returned by the `llvm::findOneNVVMAnnotation` function to the `z` variable. Here's a breakdown of the code snippet: * The `llvm::getMaxNTIDz` function takes two arguments: a `const Function&` reference to a LLVM function, and an `unsigned&` reference to an integer variable. * The function returns a `bool` value indicating whether the maximum NTID value was found. * The function uses the `llvm" LLVM,NVPTX,2240,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `x = llvm::findOneNVVMAnnotation(&F, llvm::PropertyAnnotationNames[llvm::PROPERTY_MINNCTAPERSM], x);` This statement is a function call to `llvm::findOneNVVMAnnotation`, which is a function that searches for a specific annotation in the function `F`. The annotation being searched for is `llvm::PropertyAnnotationNames[llvm::PROPERTY_MINNCTAPERSM]`, which is the name of the annotation that spec" LLVM,NVPTX,2241,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the `getMinCTASm` function is not specified. However, based on the name of the function and the parameters it takes, it appears to be related to the LLVM compiler infrastructure and may be used to determine the minimum number of threads per block (CTA) required to execute a function. Without more information about the specific implementation of the `getMinCTASm` function, it is not possible to provide a more detailed prediction of the next statement." LLVM,NVPTX,2242,"The next statement after the `if` block is the `return` statement. The `if` block checks whether the value `v` can be cast to a `BasicBlock` object, and if it can, it returns the casted value. If the `if` block is not executed (i.e., the value `v` cannot be cast to a `BasicBlock` object), the `return` statement will be executed and the function will return `nullptr`." LLVM,NVPTX,2243,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return B->getParent();` This statement is executed if the `dyn_cast` operation is successful and `B` is not null. It returns the parent of the basic block `B`." LLVM,NVPTX,2244,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `getReqNTIDx` function and the input function `F`. However, based on the name of the function and the parameters it takes, it is likely that this function is trying to retrieve the required NTID (Native Thread ID) for the specified function `F`. The `x` parameter is likely an output parameter that will be set to the required NTID. Without more information about the specific implementation of this function, it is not possible to predict" LLVM,NVPTX,2245,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `llvm::findOneNVVMAnnotation(&F, llvm::PropertyAnnotationNames[llvm::PROPERTY_REQNTID_Z], z);` This statement is calling the `llvm::findOneNVVMAnnotation` function, which is a member function of the `llvm` namespace. The function takes three arguments: a pointer to a `Function` object, a string representing the name of the annotation to find, and a reference to an `unsigned` variable where the value of the annotation will be" LLVM,NVPTX,2246,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the `getSurfaceName` function is not specified. However, based on the name of the function and the parameter it takes, it is likely that the function returns a string that represents the name of a surface associated with the `Value` object passed as an argument." LLVM,NVPTX,2247,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the `getSurfaceName` function is not specified. However, based on the name of the function and the parameter it takes, it is likely that the function returns a string that represents the name of a surface associated with the `Value` object passed as an argument." LLVM,NVPTX,2248,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return ( id == ) || ( id == ) || ( id == ) || ( id == ) || ( id == ) ;` This is a boolean expression that checks if the `id` variable is equal to any of the given string literals. If any of the conditions is true, the expression will return `true`, otherwise it will return `false`." LLVM,NVPTX,2249,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return true;` Explanation: The code snippet is checking if an argument is a read-only image parameter. It does this by first checking if the argument is an `Argument` object, and then checking if the function that the argument belongs to has a `PropertyAnnotationNames` attribute with the value `llvm::PROPERTY_ISREADONLY_IMAGE_PARAM`. If the function has this attribute, the code checks if the argument's index is in the list of annotated arguments. If the argument's index is" LLVM,NVPTX,2250,"Based on the code snippet you provided, it appears that the `llvm::findAllNVVMAnnotation` function is being used to find all annotations of a specific type in a function. The `annot` variable is being used to store the annotations that are found. If the `llvm::findAllNVVMAnnotation` function returns `true`, then it means that at least one annotation of the specified type was found in the function. In this case, the code inside the `if` statement will be executed. Based on the information provided, it is not possible to" LLVM,NVPTX,2251,The next statement after the `if` block is `return false;`. LLVM,NVPTX,2252,"The code snippet is checking if the function `F` has a specific annotation with the name `llvm::PropertyAnnotationNames[llvm::PROPERTY_ISKERNEL_FUNCTION]`. If the annotation is not found, it checks if the function's calling convention is `llvm::CallingConv::PTX_Kernel`. If the annotation is found, it checks if the value of the annotation is equal to a specific value. The next statement of the code snippet is: `return (x == );` This statement returns a boolean" LLVM,NVPTX,2253,"Based on the code snippet you provided, it appears that the next statement after the `if` statement would be: `assert(annot == && );` This is because the `if` statement is checking the value of `annot` and if it is equal to `` and ``, then the `assert` statement will be executed. If the `if` statement is not true, then the `assert` statement will not be executed." LLVM,NVPTX,2254,"The next statement of this code snippet is: return id == || id == || id == || id == || id == || id == || id == || id == || id == ; This is a boolean expression that checks if the value of the variable `id` is equal to any of the string literals listed in the expression. The `" LLVM,NVPTX,2255,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return true;` Explanation: The code snippet is checking if the function `func` has a specific annotation, and if it does, it checks if the argument number of the current argument `arg` is present in the annotation. If it is, the function returns `true`. If the annotation is not found or the argument number is not present in the annotation, the function returns `false`." LLVM,NVPTX,2256,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return true;` Explanation: The code snippet is checking if a certain annotation is present in a global variable (gv) using the `llvm::findOneNVVMAnnotation` function. If the annotation is found, the code snippet asserts that the annotation is equal to a specific value () and a specific string (). If the assertion is true, the code snippet returns true. Therefore, the next statement of this code snippet is `return true" LLVM,NVPTX,2257,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the context in which the code is being executed. However, based on the syntax and the fact that the `push_back` method is being called on the `Result` object, it is likely that the next statement will be adding an element to the `Result` vector." LLVM,NVPTX,2258,"This code snippet is a part of a function that appears to be performing some kind of data flow analysis on a graph. The function takes a value `V` as input and returns a pointer to a `PHINode` if it can be found in the graph, or `nullptr` otherwise. The code snippet you provided is the beginning of the function, and it appears to be initializing some variables and performing some basic checks on the input value `V`. Here's a breakdown of what the code is doing: 1. `V = GEP->getPointerOperand()->stripPointerCast" LLVM,NVPTX,2259,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `temp64.a[i] = str[e - 1 - i];` This statement is assigning the value of `str[e - 1 - i]` to `temp64.a[i]`. The expression `e - 1 - i` is the index of the last character in the string `str`, minus the index of the current character `i`. This is a common pattern in C code for iterating over a string in reverse order." LLVM,NVPTX,2260,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return true;` Explanation: The `isParamLoad` function checks if the given machine instruction (`MI`) is a parameter load instruction. It does this by checking if the opcode of the instruction is either `STR_LIT` or `STR_LIT`, and if the operand at index `NUM_LIT` is an immediate value. If both conditions are true, the function returns `true`, otherwise it returns `false`. In this code snippet, we have already checked if the opcode of the instruction is" LLVM,NVPTX,2261,"The code snippet you provided is a switch statement in C++. The `case` labels specify the values that the switch statement should match, and the code inside each `case` block is executed when the switch statement's value matches the corresponding `case` label. In this case, the switch statement is checking the value of a string literal, and it is returning a different string literal for each `case` label. The `llvm_unreachable` function is called at the end of the switch statement to indicate that the code should never reach that point. Therefore, the next statement of" LLVM,NVPTX,2262,"The next statement after the code snippet you provided is likely to be a call to the `initializeNVVMIntrRangePass` function, which is a member function of the `PassRegistry` class. Here's a possible implementation of the `initializeNVVMIntrRangePass` function: ``` void initializeNVVMIntrRangePass(PassRegistry &passRegistry) { // Initialize the NVVM intrinsic range pass passRegistry.addPass(new NVVMIntrRangePass()); } ``` This function takes a `PassRegistry` object" LLVM,NVPTX,2263,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `NVVMIntrRangePass::NVVMIntrRangePass(NVVMIntrRangeSM) {` This is a constructor for the `NVVMIntrRangePass` class, which takes a `NVVMIntrRangeSM` object as an argument. The constructor initializes the `NVVMIntrRangePass` object with the given `NVVMIntrRangeSM` object." LLVM,NVPTX,2264,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `NVVMIntrRangePass::NVVMIntrRangePass(NVVMIntrRangeSM) {` This is a constructor for the `NVVMIntrRangePass` class, which takes a `NVVMIntrRangeSM` object as an argument. The constructor initializes the `NVVMIntrRangePass` object with the given `NVVMIntrRangeSM` object." LLVM,NVPTX,2265,"The next statement after the `return` statement in the code snippet is the `PreservedAnalyses::none()` statement. The `runNVVMIntrRange` function is called with the `F` and `SmVersion` arguments, and if it returns `true`, the `PreservedAnalyses::none()` statement is executed, which means that no analysis is preserved. If the `runNVVMIntrRange` function returns `false`, the `PreservedAnalyses::all()` statement is executed, which means that all analyses are preserved." LLVM,NVPTX,2266,"The next statement after the `return` statement in the code snippet is the `PreservedAnalyses::none()` statement. The `runNVVMIntrRange` function is called with the `F` and `SmVersion` arguments, and if it returns `true`, the `PreservedAnalyses::none()` statement is executed, which means that no analysis is preserved. If the `runNVVMIntrRange` function returns `false`, the `PreservedAnalyses::all()` statement is executed, which means that all analyses are preserved." LLVM,NVPTX,2267,"Based on the code snippet you provided, it appears that the `addRangeMetadata` function is being called multiple times with different parameters. The function takes three parameters: a range, a value, and a call. The range is represented by a string literal, and the value is represented by a number literal. The code snippet you provided is a switch statement that checks the value of a string literal and calls the `addRangeMetadata` function with different parameters based on the value of the string literal. The `addRangeMetadata` function is called with different parameters based on the value of the string literal, and the `Changed" LLVM,NVPTX,2268,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet without knowing the specific implementation of the `NVVMIntrRange` class and the `runOnFunction` method. However, based on the name of the method and the class, it is likely that the next statement will be related to processing or analyzing the function `F`. Without more information, it is not possible to provide a more specific answer. If you have any additional context or details about the code, I would be happy to try and provide a more accurate prediction." LLVM,NVPTX,2269,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet without knowing the specific implementation of the `NVVMIntrRange` class and the `runOnFunction` method. However, based on the name of the method and the class, it is likely that the next statement will be related to processing or analyzing the function `F`. Without more information, it is not possible to provide a more specific answer. If you have any additional context or details about the code, I would be happy to try and provide a more accurate prediction." LLVM,NVPTX,2270,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be: `IntegerType * Int64Ty = Type::getInt64Ty(Context);` This is because the code is using the `Type::getInt32Ty()` function to get an `IntegerType` object for a 32-bit integer, and it is likely that the next statement will use the same function to get an `IntegerType` object for a 64-bit integer." LLVM,NVPTX,2271,"Based on the code snippet you provided, it appears to be a switch statement in a programming language. The next statement after the code snippet you provided would be: case : This is because the switch statement is checking the value of a string literal, and the next case statement after the one you provided is checking the value of a different string literal." LLVM,NVPTX,2272,"Based on the code snippet you provided, it seems like the next statement after the `switch` statement would be a `case` statement. Specifically, it would be the `case` statement for the `MaxGridSize.x` intrinsic ID. Here's the full code snippet with the next statement added: ``` switch (Callee->getIntrinsicID()) { case : case : Changed |= addRangeMetadata(, MaxBlockSize.x, Call); break" LLVM,NVPTX,2273,"The next statement of this code snippet is: C->setMetadata(LLVMContext::MD_range, MDNode::get(Context, LowAndHigh)); This statement sets the metadata for the range of values in the LLVM context. The metadata is represented by the MDNode object, which is created using the get() method of the MDNode class. The MDNode object is passed to the setMetadata() method of the C object, which sets the metadata for the range of values in the LLVM context." LLVM,NVPTX,2274,"The next statement of this code snippet is: MaxBlockSize . x = ; This is because the code snippet is setting the x dimension of the block size to a specific value, which is represented by the placeholder . The next statement after this would be the y dimension of the block size, which is also set to a specific value." LLVM,NVPTX,2275,"Based on the code snippet you provided, it appears that the `addRangeMetadata` function is being called multiple times with different parameters. The function takes three parameters: a range, a value, and a call. The range is represented by a pair of numbers, and the value is a single number. The call is a string that represents the name of a function. The code snippet you provided is part of a switch statement that is checking the value of a string literal. The string literal is being compared to a series of other string literals, and the code is executing different blocks of code depending on which string literal matches" LLVM,NVPTX,2276,"Based on the code snippet you provided, it appears that the next statement will be: case : Changed |= addRangeMetadata ( , , Call ) ; This is because the previous cases all had a similar structure, with the only difference being the value of the third argument to the `addRangeMetadata` function. The next case is similar, but with a different value for the third argument." LLVM,NVPTX,2277,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be the initialization of the `NVVMReflect` class, which is a subclass of `FunctionPass`. The `NVVMReflect` class is used to reflect on the LLVM IR code and perform various optimizations and transformations. Here is an example of how the `NVVMReflect` class might be initialized: ``` NVVMReflect reflect(ID); ``` This creates a new instance of the `NVVMReflect` class and initializes it with the `ID` parameter. The `ID` parameter" LLVM,NVPTX,2278,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `ReflectVal = Flag -> getSExtValue ( ) ;` This is because the previous statement, `if ( ReflectArg == )`, checks if the `ReflectArg` string is equal to a specific string literal, and if it is, it sets the `ReflectVal` variable to the value of the `getSExtValue()` method of the `Flag` object, which is a `ConstantInt` object." LLVM,NVPTX,2279,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `const Value * Str = Call -> getArgOperand ( ) ;` This line of code retrieves the operand at position `` of the `CallInst` object `Call`, which is a `Value` object. The operand is then stored in the variable `Str`." LLVM,NVPTX,2280,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `ReflectFunction = nullptr;` This statement is assigning the value `nullptr` to the `ReflectFunction` member variable of the `NVVMReflect` class." LLVM,NVPTX,2281,"Based on the code snippet provided, it appears to be a part of a program that is using the LLVM library to perform some kind of analysis or transformation on a program. The code is making a number of assertions about the structure of the program being analyzed or transformed, and is using the LLVM API to access and manipulate the program's instructions and data structures. The next statement of the code snippet is likely to be another assertion or a call to a function from the LLVM API, as the code is currently in the middle of a loop that is iterating over the users of a function called ""Ref" LLVM,NVPTX,2282,"The next statement after the code snippet you provided is not clear, as it appears to be the end of a method or function. However, based on the context of the code, it is likely that the next statement would be a return statement, as the method or function is returning an instance of the `NVVMReflect` class. Here is an example of what the next statement might look like: ``` return new NVVMReflect(SmVersion); ``` This statement would return an instance of the `NVVMReflect` class, passing in the `SmVersion` object as" LLVM,NVPTX,2283,"The next statement after the code snippet you provided is not clear, as it appears to be the end of a method or function. However, based on the context of the code, it is likely that the next statement would be a return statement, as the method or function is returning an instance of the `NVVMReflect` class. Here is an example of what the next statement might look like: ``` return new NVVMReflect(SmVersion); ``` This statement would return an instance of the `NVVMReflect` class, passing in the `SmVersion` object as" LLVM,NVPTX,2284,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be the initialization of the `NVVMReflect` class, which is a subclass of `FunctionPass` and `SmVersion`. The `initializeNVVMReflectPass` function is called to initialize the pass and register it with the pass registry. Here is a possible next statement: ``` NVVMReflect::NVVMReflect(unsigned int Sm) : FunctionPass(ID), SmVersion(Sm) { initializeNVVMReflectPass(*PassRegistry::getPassRegistry()); } ``` This statement" LLVM,NVPTX,2285,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `NVVMReflectPass::NVVMReflectPass()` This is a constructor for the `NVVMReflectPass` class, which takes an integer argument ``. The constructor initializes the `NVVMReflectPass` object with the given argument." LLVM,NVPTX,2286,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `NVVMReflectPass::NVVMReflectPass()` This is a constructor for the `NVVMReflectPass` class, which takes an integer argument ``. The constructor initializes the `NVVMReflectPass` object with the given argument." LLVM,NVPTX,2287,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the `runOnFunction` method depends on the specific implementation of the `NVVMReflect` class and the input function `F`. However, based on the name of the method and the fact that it is a member of the `NVVMReflect` class, which is a subclass of the `FunctionPass` class, it is likely that the method performs some kind of analysis or transformation on the input function `F`. Without more information about the specific implementation of the `NV" LLVM,NVPTX,2288,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be: `ReflectVal = VarMap[ReflectArg];` This is because the code is checking if the `ReflectArg` is present in the `VarMap` map, and if it is, it is assigning the value associated with that key to the `ReflectVal` variable. The `find()` method of the map returns an iterator to the element with the specified key, and if the key is not found, it returns the `end()` iterator. Therefore, the code is checking if the `ReflectArg` is present in" LLVM,NVPTX,2289,"The code snippet you provided is a part of a function that appears to be parsing a string literal and extracting a value from it. The function is using the LLVM API to perform this task. The next statement in the code snippet is: `ReflectVal = VarMap[ReflectArg];` This line is using the `[]` operator on the `VarMap` object to access the value associated with the key `ReflectArg`. The value returned by this operation is then assigned to the variable `ReflectVal`." LLVM,NVPTX,2290,"The code snippet is extracting a string argument from a function call. The first line extracts the `NUM_LIT`th argument of the `Call` instruction, which is assumed to be a `ConstantExpr`. The second line checks if the argument is a `CallInst` and if so, extracts the `NUM_LIT`th argument of the `CallInst`. The third line asserts that the extracted argument is a `ConstantExpr` and has the string literal `` as its value. The fourth line extracts the `NUM_LIT`th" LLVM,NVPTX,2291,"The next statement in this code snippet is: `Call->replaceAllUsesWith(ConstantInt::get(Call->getType(), ReflectVal));` This statement replaces all uses of the `Call` instruction with a new `ConstantInt` instruction that has the same type as the `Call` instruction and the value of `ReflectVal`. The `ToRemove` vector is also updated to include the `Call` instruction, which will be removed later." LLVM,NVPTX,2292,"This code snippet appears to be part of a larger function that is performing some kind of optimization or transformation on a LLVM IR module. The code is using the LLVM API to manipulate the module and extract information from it. The code is checking the number of operands of a call instruction and the type of the operands. If the operands are of the correct type, it extracts the operands and performs some additional checks and transformations. The code is also using the `assert` function to check for certain conditions and to provide error messages if the conditions are not met. Without more context" LLVM,NVPTX,2293,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `initializeNVVMReflectPass(*PassRegistry::getPassRegistry());` This statement initializes the `NVVMReflect` pass by calling the `initializeNVVMReflectPass` function, which is a member function of the `PassRegistry` class. The `PassRegistry` class is a singleton class that manages the registration and initialization of passes in the LLVM compiler. The `initializeNVVMReflectPass` function is called with the `PassRegistry` object as an argument, which allows the pass to register itself with" LLVM,NVPTX,2294,"The next statement of this code snippet is: assert(ReflectArg.size() > 0 && );" LLVM,NVPTX,2295,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be: `ToRemove.push_back(Call);` This is because the code is iterating over a list of instructions in a function, and for each instruction, it is checking if it is a call instruction and if the called function is a specific function (NVVM_REFLECT_FUNCTION). If the instruction is a call instruction and the called function is the specified function, then it is added to a list of instructions to be removed (ToRemove)." LLVM,NVPTX,2296,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the context in which the code is being executed and the specific implementation of the `NVVMReflect` class. However, based on the name of the class and the fact that it is being instantiated with a `Mapping` object, it is likely that the next statement will involve the creation of a new instance of the `NVVMReflect` class and the initialization of its state with the `Mapping` object." LLVM,NVPTX,2297,"The next statement after the code snippet you provided is likely to be a call to the `initializeNVVMReflectPass` function, which is a member function of the `PassRegistry` class. Here's a possible continuation of the code snippet: ``` initializeNVVMReflectPass(PassRegistry::getPassRegistry()); ``` This line of code initializes the `NVVMReflectPass` pass, which is a pass that reflects the NVVM IR (Intermediate Representation) of a function. The `initializeNVVMReflectPass` function takes" LLVM,NVPTX,2298,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `if (const GlobalVariable *GV = dyn_cast(Operand)) {` This is a conditional statement that checks if the `Operand` is a `GlobalVariable` and if it has an initializer. If the condition is true, the initializer is assigned to `Operand`." LLVM,NVPTX,2299,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `VarMap[NameValPair[1]] = Val;` Explanation: The code snippet is parsing a string of the form ""name=value,name=value,..."" and storing the values in a map. The `StringRef` class is used to split the string into substrings, and the `split` method is used to split the substrings into name-value pairs. The `assert` statements are used to check that the input string is in the correct format. The loop iterates over the name-value pairs and" LLVM,NVPTX,2300,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be: `Reflect -> replaceAllUsesWith(ConstantInt::get(Reflect->getType(), ReflectVal));` This statement replaces all uses of the `Reflect` instruction with a constant integer value. The `ReflectVal` variable is set to the value of the `ReflectArg` string, which is a substring of the `SymStr` string. The `Reflect` instruction is then added to the `ToRemove` vector, which is used to keep track of instructions that need to be removed from the" LLVM,NVPTX,2301,"This code snippet is a part of a larger program that appears to be related to the LLVM compiler infrastructure. It is difficult to provide a definitive answer to your question without more context, but based on the code snippet you provided, it appears to be related to the following: 1. The code is using the LLVM API to manipulate the LLVM IR (Intermediate Representation) of a program. 2. The code is specifically focused on the `Reflect` instruction, which is a part of the LLVM IR. 3. The code is using the `GEP` instruction to get the" LLVM,NVPTX,2302,"This code snippet appears to be part of a larger program that is using the LLVM compiler infrastructure to perform some kind of optimization or transformation on the code. The specifics of the optimization or transformation are not clear from the snippet alone, but it appears to be related to the use of constant data and the extraction of string literals. The code snippet is using the `cast` function to cast the `Operand` object to a `ConstantDataSequential` object, which is a subclass of `ConstantData`. The `isCString` method is then called on the `ConstantDataSequ" LLVM,NVPTX,2303,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the context in which the code is being executed and the specific implementation of the `NVVMReflect` class. However, based on the name of the class and the fact that it is being instantiated with a `Mapping` object, it is likely that the next statement will involve the creation of a new instance of the `NVVMReflect` class and the initialization of its state with the `Mapping` object." LLVM,NVPTX,2304,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the `setPreservesAll()` method is not specified. However, based on the name of the method, it is likely that it sets a flag or property that indicates whether the `AU` object should preserve all of its current state when a certain action is taken. Without more context or information about the `AU` class and its methods, it is not possible to provide a more specific answer." LLVM,NVPTX,2305,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `if (ToRemove.size() == ) return false;` This statement checks if the size of the `ToRemove` vector is equal to the specified number of literals. If it is, the function returns `false`." LLVM,NVPTX,2306,"This code snippet is a part of a function that is likely part of a compiler or interpreter. It appears to be processing a string literal and replacing certain parts of it with other values. The code is using a number of C++ classes and functions from the LLVM library, which is a collection of modular and reusable compiler and toolchain technologies. Here's a breakdown of the code: 1. `const ConstantExpr * GEP = cast < ConstantExpr > ( Str ) ;`: This line casts the `Str` variable, which is a string literal, to a `" LLVM,NVPTX,2307,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `for (; I != E; ++I) {`" LLVM,NVPTX,2308,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `Tys[0] = PointerType::get(I8Ty, 0);` This is because the loop starts at `i = 0` and increments `i` by 1 until it reaches `i != 0`, which means that the first iteration of the loop will set `Tys[0]` to a pointer type with the `I8Ty` type and a null pointer." LLVM,NVPTX,2309,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `ReflectFunction = M.getFunction(NVVM_REFLECT_FUNCTION);` This line retrieves a function from the module `M` with the name `NVVM_REFLECT_FUNCTION`. The function is then stored in the variable `ReflectFunction`." LLVM,NVPTX,2310,"The next statement in this code snippet is: `ValStream >> Val;` This statement reads the value from the `ValStream` stringstream and stores it in the `Val` variable." LLVM,NVPTX,2311,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet as it appears to be a fragment of a larger program and the context is not clear. However, based on the code provided, it appears that the program is working with a machine instruction and its operands, and is attempting to replace certain operands with new values. The specific operation being performed is not clear, but it appears to be related to optimization or code generation." LLVM,NVPTX,2312,"Based on the code snippet you provided, it appears to be a part of a function that is manipulating a machine instruction. The function is removing operands from a copy of the instruction and then setting the description of the instruction to a scalar version of the instruction. The next statement of the code snippet is likely to be the following: `for (unsigned j = , e = allOperands.size(); j != e; ++j) {` This statement is starting a new loop that will iterate over the `allOperands` vector and perform some operation on each element" LLVM,NVPTX,2313,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `for (unsigned j = 0; j < e; ++j) {` This line is the start of a for loop that iterates over the operands of the `MachineInstrBuilder` object `copy`. The loop variable `j` is initialized to 0 and incremented by 1 on each iteration until it reaches the value `e`, which is the number of operands in the `MachineInstrBuilder` object. Inside the loop, the code checks whether the current operand is a register or not. If it" LLVM,NVPTX,2314,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet without knowing the specific implementation of the `MachineInstrBuilder` class and the `getScalarVersion`, `getScalarRegisters`, `addReg`, and `addOperand` methods. However, based on the names of these methods and the context in which they are used, it appears that this code is attempting to create a copy of a machine instruction and modify it to use scalar registers instead of vector registers. The code first creates a copy of the original instruction using the `CloneMachineInstr` method, and then sets the description of" LLVM,NVPTX,2315,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `MachineOperand` class and the `getScalarVersion` and `getScalarRegisters` functions. However, based on the context and the names of the functions involved, it is likely that the next statement will be related to the manipulation of the `MachineOperand` object and the `scalarRegs` vector. One possible next statement could be: ``` copy->setOperand(, scalarRegs[0]); ```" LLVM,NVPTX,2316,"The next statement of this code snippet is: copy -> RemoveOperand(); Explanation: The code snippet is part of a function that is modifying a copy of a machine instruction. The function is removing operands from the copy and then adding new operands based on the contents of a vector of scalar registers. The next statement after the code snippet is a call to RemoveOperand, which removes an operand from the copy of the machine instruction." LLVM,NVPTX,2317,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `copies.push_back(BuildMI(F, DL, InstrInfo->get(getScalarVersion(Instr)), dest[i]).addOperand(Instr->getOperand( + i)));` This statement is adding an operand to the `copies` vector, which is a vector of `MachineInstr` objects. The operand being added is the result of calling `BuildMI` with the function `F`, the debug location `DL`, the scalar version of the instruction" LLVM,NVPTX,2318,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the code depends on the specific inputs and the implementation of the `numCopiesNeeded` function. However, based on the context and the code snippet provided, it is likely that the next statement will be a loop that creates the necessary copies of the vector element, using the `copies` vector as a container for the copies. The loop will likely iterate over the `numcopies` variable and create a copy of the vector element for each iteration." LLVM,NVPTX,2319,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `MachineInstrBuilder` class and the `getScalarVersion` and `getScalarRegisters` functions. However, based on the context and the names of the variables, it is likely that the next statement will be related to the creation and initialization of a new machine instruction. The `copies` vector is being used to store a list of machine instructions, and the `MachineInstrBuilder` class is being used to create and initialize new machine instructions. The `copy`" LLVM,NVPTX,2320,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific values of the variables and the implementation of the `getScalarRegisters` and `getOperand` functions. However, based on the code snippet, it appears that the next statement will be a call to the `isImm` function, which is a member function of the `MachineOperand` class. The `isImm` function returns a boolean value indicating whether the operand is an immediate value. Therefore, the next statement of this code snippet is likely to be a call to" LLVM,NVPTX,2321,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `copy.addReg(src1[elem]);` Explanation: The code snippet is building a machine instruction using the `MachineInstrBuilder` class. The `addReg` method is used to add a register operand to the instruction. In this case, the register operand is `src1[elem]`, where `elem` is the element number of the source register. The `src1` array is an array of register operands, and `elem` is the index of the register operand to be added to the" LLVM,NVPTX,2322,"This code snippet appears to be part of a loop that is iterating over a set of instructions and performing some kind of optimization or transformation on them. It is difficult to determine exactly what the code is doing without more context, but here is a rough outline of what the code appears to be doing: 1. The code checks if the current instruction is a virtual register definition. If it is not, it continues to the next instruction. 2. If the current instruction is a virtual register definition, the code checks if it needs to be replaced. If it does not need to be replaced, the code continues to the next" LLVM,NVPTX,2323,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `for (unsigned i = 0; i < numcopies; ++i) {` This line is the start of a for loop that will iterate over the `copies` vector and perform some operations on each element. The loop will continue until `i` is equal to `numcopies`, which is the number of copies needed for the instruction." LLVM,NVPTX,2324,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `dest.setOpcode();` Explanation: The code snippet is creating a copy of a machine instruction and modifying its operands. The `MachineOperand` object `dest` is being set to the operand at index `` of the copied instruction. The next statement is likely to be setting the opcode of the destination operand to a specific value, which is represented by the placeholder ``." LLVM,NVPTX,2325,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `copy->RemoveOperand();` This is because the first `for` loop has not yet completed its iteration, and the next statement to be executed is the body of the loop, which contains the `RemoveOperand` method call." LLVM,NVPTX,2326,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `for (unsigned i = , e = otherOperands.size(); i != e; ++i) copy->addOperand(otherOperands[i]);` This is because the previous `for` loop has finished iterating over the `scalarRegs` vector, and the next `for` loop is iterating over the `otherOperands` vector. The `copy->addOperand(otherOperands[i])` statement is executed for each element in the `otherOperands` vector, and the" LLVM,NVPTX,2327,"Based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the next statement will be: `copy->setOperand(, scalarRegs[0]);` This is because the code is currently setting the description of the `MachineInstr` object `copy` to the scalar version of the instruction, and then removing the operand at index `` from `copy`. The next logical step would be to set the operand at index `` of `copy` to the first element of the `scalarRegs` vector, which is a" LLVM,NVPTX,2328,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be: `copy -> addOperand ( dest [ i ] ) ;` This is because the code is currently iterating over the `dest` vector, and the next step would be to add the current element of the vector as an operand to the `copy` instruction." LLVM,NVPTX,2329,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be the start of a loop, specifically a `for` loop. The loop will iterate from `0` to `numcopies - 1`, and for each iteration, it will create a new `MachineInstr` object and add it to the `copies` vector. The loop will use the `BuildMI` function to create the new `MachineInstr` object, and it will use the `getScalarVersion` function to get the scalar version of the current instruction. The `addOperand` function will be used to add the oper" LLVM,NVPTX,2330,"Based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the next statement will be: `copies.push_back(F.CloneMachineInstr(Instr));` This is because the code is currently iterating over the `copies` vector and calling the `CloneMachineInstr` method on each element. The next statement is likely to be the next iteration of this loop, which will clone the next element in the `copies` vector." LLVM,NVPTX,2331,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `copy->RemoveOperand();` This statement removes the operand at index `` from the `MachineInstr` object `copy`." LLVM,NVPTX,2332,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `copy->addOperand(MachineOperand::CreateReg(src[which.getImm()], false));` This statement adds an operand to the `copy` machine instruction, which is a register operand. The register operand is created using the `MachineOperand::CreateReg` method, and it is passed the value of the `src` register at the index specified by the immediate value of the `which` operand. The `false` argument indicates that the register is not a write-only operand." LLVM,NVPTX,2333,"The next statement of this code snippet is: copies.push_back(copy);" LLVM,NVPTX,2334,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `MachineInstr * copy = BuildMI(F, DL, InstrInfo->get(getScalarVersion(Instr)), dest[i]);`" LLVM,NVPTX,2335,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `copy->addOperand(MachineOperand::CreateReg(src1[elem], false));` This statement adds an operand to the `copy` machine instruction, which is a register operand. The register operand is created using the `MachineOperand::CreateReg` method, and it is passed the value of `src1[elem]` as the register number, and `false` as the second argument to indicate that the register is not a floating-point register." LLVM,NVPTX,2336,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `MachineInstr * copy = BuildMI(F, DL, InstrInfo->get(getScalarVersion(Instr)), dest[i]);`" LLVM,NVPTX,2337,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the context in which the code is being executed and the specific implementation of the `VectorElementize` class. However, based on the name of the class and the fact that it is being instantiated with a `tm` parameter, it is likely that the next statement will involve the creation of a new vector element based on the `tm` parameter." LLVM,NVPTX,2338,The next statement after the `for` loop will be the `assert` statement. LLVM,NVPTX,2339,The next statement after the `for` loop will be the increment statement `++i`. LLVM,NVPTX,2340,The next statement after `return ;` would be the end of the function. LLVM,NVPTX,2341,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return getElemClass ( RC ) ;` This statement is a return statement that returns the result of the `getElemClass` function, which is called with the `RC` parameter. The `getElemClass` function is not defined in the code snippet provided, so it is not possible to determine what it does or what it returns. However, based on the name of the function, it appears to be related to getting the element class" LLVM,NVPTX,2342,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `VectorToScalarMap[regnum] = temp;` This line assigns the `temp` vector, which contains the virtual registers created in the loop, to the `VectorToScalarMap` map at the key `regnum`." LLVM,NVPTX,2343,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return isVectorRegister(dest.getReg());` This statement returns the result of the `isVectorRegister` function, which is called on the `dest` operand. The `dest` operand is a `MachineOperand` object, and the `getReg` method is called on it to retrieve the register number. The `isVectorRegister` function checks if the register number is a vector register." LLVM,NVPTX,2344,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `getRegClass` method and the value of the `reg` variable. However, based on the name of the method and the variable, it is likely that the next statement will be a call to a method that returns a register class object, such as `getRegClass` or `getRegisterClass`." LLVM,NVPTX,2345,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `isVectorRegister` method and the `TargetRegisterClass` class. However, based on the name of the method and the class, it is likely that the next statement will check whether the register is a vector register or not. Here are a few possibilities for what the next statement could be: 1. `return RC -> isVectorRegister ( reg ) ;` 2. `return MRI -> isVectorRegister ( reg ) ;` 3. `return reg ->" LLVM,NVPTX,2346,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return getVectorSize ( MRI -> getRegClass ( regnum ) ) ;` This statement is executed if the number of definitions (`numDefs`) is equal to a specific value (which is not specified in the code snippet you provided). The statement returns the vector size of the instruction, which is obtained by calling the `getVectorSize` function with the register class of the register number `regnum`." LLVM,NVPTX,2347,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `if (numDefs == ) {` This is because the previous `if` statement was executed, and the `numDefs` variable was incremented. Therefore, the next `if` statement to be executed is the one that checks if `numDefs` is equal to ``." LLVM,NVPTX,2348,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `for (unsigned i = 0, e = deadMoves.size(); i != e; ++i) {` This is a for loop that iterates over the `deadMoves` vector, which is a vector of machine instructions that are considered dead and can be removed. The loop variable `i` is initialized to 0, and the loop continues until `i` is equal to the size of the `deadMoves` vector. Inside the loop, the code removes the machine instruction at index `" LLVM,NVPTX,2349,The next statement after the `elementize ( F ) ;` statement is the `if ( RemoveRedundantMoves )` statement. LLVM,NVPTX,2350,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `elementize(F);` This is because the `if` statement that follows the `while` loop is not executed, as the condition `RemoveRedundantMoves` is not true. Therefore, the `while` loop is not entered, and the next statement after the `while` loop is executed, which is `elementize(F);`." LLVM,NVPTX,2351,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the `VectorElementize` function depends on the specific implementation of the `MachineFunctionPass` class and the `TargetMachine` class, as well as the input data. However, based on the name of the function and the parameters it takes, it is likely that the next statement of the code snippet will be a call to the `VectorElementize` function, which will perform some operation on the input data and return a result. The result will likely be stored in a variable or used as an argument to another" LLVM,NVPTX,2352,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the `VectorElementize` function depends on the specific implementation of the `MachineFunctionPass` class and the `TargetMachine` class, as well as the input data. However, based on the name of the function and the parameters it takes, it is likely that the next statement of the code snippet will be a call to the `VectorElementize` function, which will perform some operation on the input data and return a result. The result will likely be stored in a variable or used as an argument to another" LLVM,RISCV,0,"The next statement of this code snippet is: return (Val & ~0x0000000000000000) == 0x0000000000000000; Explanation: The code snippet is checking if the given value `Val` is an immediate value in the HF (High Frequency) range. The HF range is defined by the mask `~0x0000000000000000`, which means that the 6" LLVM,RISCV,1,"The next statement of this code snippet is: return (Val & ~0x0000000000000000) == 0x0000000000000000; Explanation: The code snippet is checking if the given value `Val` is an immediate value in the HF (High Frequency) range. The HF range is defined by the mask `~0x0000000000000000`, which means that the 6" LLVM,RISCV,2,"The next statement of this code snippet is: return (Val & ~ ) == ; This statement is a comparison of the bitwise AND of the value `Val` and the bitwise NOT of the literal value `` with the literal value ``. If the result of the bitwise AND is equal to the literal value, the statement will return `true`, otherwise it will return `false`." LLVM,RISCV,3,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `isImmHL` function and the value of the `Val` parameter. However, based on the name of the function and the parameter type, it is likely that the function is checking whether the value of `Val` is a valid immediate value for the HL instruction. If this is the case, the next statement of the code snippet is likely to be a comparison or a logical operation that checks whether the value of `Val` is within a certain range or meets certain criteria." LLVM,RISCV,4,"The next statement of this code snippet is: return ( Val & ~ ) == ; This statement is a boolean expression that checks if the value of `Val` is equal to the bitwise AND of `Val` and the complement of `NUM_LIT`. The `~` operator is the bitwise NOT operator, which flips all the bits of its operand. Therefore, the expression `( Val & ~ )` is equivalent to `Val & ( ~ )`, which is" LLVM,RISCV,5,"The next statement of this code snippet is: return ( Val & ~ ) == ; This statement is a return statement that returns a boolean value indicating whether the given value `Val` is an immediate value that can be loaded into a register using the LH (Load Halfword) instruction. The expression `( Val & ~ ) == ` checks whether the given value `Val` is an immediate value that can be loaded into a register using the LH instruction. If the expression evaluates to true," LLVM,RISCV,6,"The next statement of this code snippet is: return (Val & ~ ) == ; This statement is a comparison of the bitwise AND of the value `Val` and the bitwise NOT of the literal value `` with the literal value ``. If the result of the bitwise AND is equal to the literal value, the statement will return `true`, otherwise it will return `false`." LLVM,RISCV,7,"The next statement of this code snippet is: return (Val & ~ ) == ; This statement is a comparison of the bitwise AND of the value `Val` and the bitwise NOT of the literal value `` with the literal value ``. If the result of the bitwise AND is equal to the literal value, the statement will return `true`, otherwise it will return `false`." LLVM,RISCV,8,"The next statement of this code snippet is: return ( Val & ~ ) == ; This statement is a boolean expression that checks if the value of `Val` is equal to the literal value `NUM_LIT` after masking out all bits except the least significant `NUM_LIT` bits. The `~` operator is a bitwise NOT operator, which inverts all the bits of its operand. The `&` operator performs a bitwise AND operation between the inverted `Val` and `NUM_LIT`, which" LLVM,RISCV,9,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet without knowing the specific implementation of the `fixupNeedsRelaxation` method and the context in which it is being called. However, based on the name of the method and the parameters it takes, it appears to be a method that determines whether a fixup needs to be relaxed. The method takes a `MCFixup` object, a `uint64_t` value, a `MCRelaxableFragment` object, and an `MCAsmLayout` object as parameters. It is likely that the method uses these" LLVM,RISCV,10,"This code snippet appears to be defining a table of fixup kinds for a machine code assembler. The table is defined as a list of tuples, where each tuple contains a string literal, a numerical literal, and a bitmask of flags. The flags are used to indicate the type of fixup and any additional information about the fixup. The next statement in the code snippet is likely to be the definition of the next fixup kind in the table. It will likely be a tuple with the same structure as the previous tuples, containing a string literal, a numerical literal, and a bitmask of flags." LLVM,RISCV,11,The next statement after `return ;` would be the end of the function. LLVM,RISCV,12,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be a return statement that returns the number of fixup kinds. The `` placeholder is a hint that the return value is a string literal, but the actual value returned will depend on the implementation of the `getNumFixupKinds()` method." LLVM,RISCV,13,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the `requiresDiffExpressionRelocations` method is dependent on the specific implementation of the `RelocatableCode` class and the context in which it is called. However, based on the name of the method and the fact that it is marked as `const`, it is likely that this method returns a boolean value indicating whether the code requires diff expression relocations. The `const` keyword indicates that the method does not modify the state of the object, so it is likely that the method returns a" LLVM,RISCV,14,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be the initialization of the `MCAsmBackend` base class, which is not shown in the code snippet. The `MCAsmBackend` class is a base class for the `AsmBackend` class, and it is responsible for providing the basic functionality for assembling machine code. The `AsmBackend` class is a subclass of `MCAsmBackend` and provides additional functionality for assembling machine code for a specific target architecture. The `MCAsmBackend` class has a constructor that takes a `MC" LLVM,RISCV,15,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be the initialization of the `MCAsmBackend` base class, which is not shown in the code snippet. The `MCAsmBackend` class is a base class for the `AsmBackend` class, and it is responsible for providing the basic functionality for assembling machine code. The `AsmBackend` class is a subclass of `MCAsmBackend` and provides additional functionality for assembling machine code for a specific target architecture. The `MCAsmBackend` class has a constructor that takes a `MC" LLVM,RISCV,16,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of a code snippet with certainty without knowing the context and the purpose of the code. However, based on the information provided, it appears that the code is setting the `ForceRelocs` variable to `true`. This could potentially be used to force the relocation of a memory block or to enable the use of relocatable memory. Without more information, it is difficult to provide a more specific answer." LLVM,RISCV,17,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `AsmBackend` class and the context in which it is being used. However, based on the name of the method and the fact that it is overriding a method from a parent class, it is likely that the next statement will be related to the assembly code generation process. Some possible next statements could include: * `return` - This could indicate that the method is returning a value, such as a string or a list of instructions, that represents the assembly code generated by" LLVM,RISCV,18,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `AsmBackend` class and the context in which it is being used. However, based on the name of the method and the fact that it is overriding a method from a parent class, it is likely that the next statement will be related to the assembly code generation process. Some possible next statements could include: * `return` - This could indicate that the method is returning a value, such as a string or a list of instructions, that represents the assembly code generated by" LLVM,RISCV,19,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet without knowing the values of the various constants and variables used in the code. However, based on the pattern of the code, it appears that the next statement will be a case statement with a similar structure to the previous case statements. The code is using a switch statement to perform different actions based on the value of a variable. Each case statement is checking a different condition and performing a different action. The code is also using bitwise operations to manipulate the value of the variable. Without knowing the specific values of the constants and variables used in the code," LLVM,RISCV,20,"Based on the code snippet you provided, it appears to be a part of a switch statement that is handling different types of fixups. The next statement is likely to be another case statement or the default statement. Without more context, it's difficult to predict the exact next statement, but some possible options are: * Another case statement for a different type of fixup * The default statement, which is executed if none of the previous case statements match * A break statement, which exits the switch statement * A continue statement, which skips to the next iteration of the switch statement" LLVM,RISCV,21,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `Asm` class and the `getContext` and `getKind` methods. However, based on the names of the methods and variables, it appears that this code is related to assembly language programming and is attempting to retrieve information about a fixup (a reference to a location in memory that needs to be updated). The code first retrieves a reference to the current assembly context using the `getContext` method, and then retrieves the kind of fixup using the `getKind`" LLVM,RISCV,22,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return createELFObjectWriter(OS, OSABI, Is64Bit);` This statement creates a new instance of the `ISA_LIT` class, passing the `OS` and `OSABI` parameters to the constructor. The `Is64Bit` parameter is also passed to the constructor, but it is not used in this context. The `create` method is called with the `ISA_LIT` class as the template parameter, and the resulting object is returned as the result" LLVM,RISCV,23,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be the creation of a new instance of the `AsmBackend` class, using the `OSABI` and `isArch64Bit` values as arguments. Here's a breakdown of the code snippet: * `uint8_t OSABI = MCELFObjectTargetWriter :: getOSABI ( TT . getOS ( ) ) ;`: This line retrieves the OS ABI (Application Binary Interface) value for the current target using the `getOSABI` method of the `MCEL" LLVM,RISCV,24,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet without knowing the specific implementation of the `fixupNeedsRelaxation` method and the context in which it is being called. However, based on the name of the method and the parameters it takes, it appears to be a method that determines whether a fixup needs to be relaxed. The method takes a `MCFixup` object, a `uint64_t` value, a `MCRelaxableFragment` object, and an `MCAsmLayout` object as parameters. It is likely that the method uses these" LLVM,RISCV,25,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `const MCFixupKindInfo & getFixupKindInfo(MCFixupKind Kind) const override {` This is a function declaration that defines the `getFixupKindInfo` function, which takes a `MCFixupKind` parameter and returns a reference to a `MCFixupKindInfo` object. The function is marked with the `override` keyword, which means that it is overriding a virtual function from a base class. The function body is not shown in the code snippet." LLVM,RISCV,26,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet without knowing the specific implementation of the `mayNeedRelaxation` function and the `MCInst` class. However, based on the name of the function and the fact that it is declared as a `const` function, it is likely that the next statement will be a check to determine whether the instruction needs to be relaxed. Here are a few possibilities for what the next statement could be: 1. A check to see if the instruction is a branch instruction and needs to be relaxed to a longer instruction. 2. A check" LLVM,RISCV,27,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `MCInst & Res = Inst.relax(STI);`" LLVM,RISCV,28,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `AsmBackend` class and the `MCAsmBackend` class. However, based on the code snippet provided, it is likely that the next statement will be a constructor for the `AsmBackend` class, which will initialize the object with the given `OSABI` and `Is64Bit` values." LLVM,RISCV,29,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `AsmBackend` class and the `MCAsmBackend` class. However, based on the code snippet provided, it is likely that the next statement will be a constructor for the `AsmBackend` class, which will initialize the object with the given `OSABI` and `Is64Bit` values." LLVM,RISCV,30,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `OW -> write32();` This is because the `for` loop will execute the statement `OW -> write32();` for each iteration, starting from `i = ` and increasing by `` until `i < Count`." LLVM,RISCV,31,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the `writeNopData` method depends on the specific implementation of the `AsmBackend` class and the input parameters. However, based on the name of the method and the parameters it takes, it is likely that the method is intended to write a sequence of NOP (no-operation) instructions to the output file. The `Count` parameter specifies the number of NOP instructions to write, and the `OW` parameter is a pointer to a `MCObjectWriter` object that is used" LLVM,RISCV,32,"Based on the code snippet you provided, it appears to be a part of a switch statement that is handling different types of fixups for a linker. The next statement is likely to be another case statement or the default case. Without more context, it's difficult to predict exactly what the next statement will be, but some possible options include: * Another case statement for a different type of fixup * The default case, which handles any fixup that doesn't match any of the previous cases * A statement that performs some common logic for all fixups, such as updating the value of the" LLVM,RISCV,33,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be: `if (Info.TargetOffset > 0) {` This is because the code checks if the `TargetOffset` field of the `MCFixupKindInfo` struct is greater than 0, and if so, it shifts the `Value` left by the `TargetOffset` amount." LLVM,RISCV,34,"Based on the code snippet you provided, it appears to be a definition of an array of structures, where each structure represents a fixup kind and its associated information. The array is named `Infos` and has 20 elements, each of which is a structure with four fields: a string literal, three numerical literals, and a bitwise OR of two enumeration values. The next statement of this code snippet would likely be the initialization of the first element of the `Infos` array, which would involve assigning values to the four fields of the structure. For example: ``` Infos[0" LLVM,RISCV,35,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the context in which the function is called and the values of the variables involved. However, based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the function `getTargetABI()` is a member function of a class that has a data member `TargetABI` of type `STR_LIT`. The function returns the value of `TargetABI`." LLVM,RISCV,36,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be the implementation of the `getRelaxedOpcode` function, which is called by the `mayNeedRelaxation` function to determine the relaxed opcode for the given instruction. The `getRelaxedOpcode` function is likely to use a lookup table or a set of rules to determine the relaxed opcode for the given instruction opcode." LLVM,RISCV,37,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `willForceRelocations()` method and the context in which it is called. However, based on the name of the method and the fact that it is being called as part of a `return` statement, it is likely that the method is returning a boolean value indicating whether or not relocations will be forced." LLVM,RISCV,38,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return STI->getFeatureBits()[];` This statement returns the value of the `getFeatureBits()` method of the `STI` object, which is a member of the `MCAssembler` class. The `getFeatureBits()` method returns a bit vector representing the features of the assembler, and the `` token is used to access a specific feature bit." LLVM,RISCV,39,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the code depends on the specific implementation of the `STI` class and the value of the string literal. However, based on the syntax and the fact that the `getFeatureBits()` method is being called on an instance of the `STI` class, it is likely that the next statement will be a call to the `getFeatureBits()` method, which will return a value that represents the feature bits of the `STI` instance. It is also possible that the next statement could" LLVM,RISCV,40,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the `willForceRelocations` method depends on the specific implementation of the `Relocatable` class and the state of the object. However, based on the name of the method and the fact that it is a `const` method, it is likely that the method will return a boolean value indicating whether the object is currently in a state where it needs to be relocated. The method may check the object's current position and the positions of other objects in the same container to determine whether relocation" LLVM,RISCV,41,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the `willForceRelocations` method depends on the specific implementation of the `Relocatable` class and the state of the object. However, based on the name of the method and the fact that it is a `const` method, it is likely that the method will return a boolean value indicating whether the object is currently in a state where it needs to be relocated. The method may check the object's current position and the positions of other objects in the same container to determine whether relocation" LLVM,RISCV,42,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `getFixupKindInfo` method and the values of the `Kind` parameter. However, based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the method is returning a reference to an element of the `Infos` array, which is an array of `MCFixupKindInfo` objects. The `Infos` array contains a list of `MCFixupKindInfo` objects, each of which contains information about a specific fixup kind. The `getFix" LLVM,RISCV,43,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return Infos[Kind - FirstTargetFixupKind];` This statement is reached if the `Kind` parameter is greater than or equal to `FirstTargetFixupKind`. In this case, the function returns the `MCFixupKindInfo` object at the index `Kind - FirstTargetFixupKind` in the `Infos` array." LLVM,RISCV,44,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it appears to be part of a larger function and the context is not provided. However, based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the next statement will be a case statement, possibly for the ""STR_LIT"" case. The code snippet is using a switch statement to handle different cases based on the value of the ""Fixup"" variable. The cases are represented by strings, such as ""STR_LIT"". The code inside each case is responsible for handling the specific case and returning a value. The" LLVM,RISCV,45,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `Data[Offset + i] |= uint8_t((Value >> (i * 8)) & 0xFF);` This is a loop that iterates over the bytes in the `Data` array, starting at the `Offset` position and continuing for `NumBytes` bytes. The loop body sets the value of each byte to the result of a bitwise OR operation between the current byte value and a masked version of the `Value` parameter. The mask is created by shifting the `Value` parameter right by `i *" LLVM,RISCV,46,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be a call to the `getOSABI` method of the `MCELFObjectTargetWriter` class, passing in the result of the `getOS` method of the `TT` object as an argument. The `getOSABI` method is used to retrieve the Operating System ABI (Application Binary Interface) of the target platform, which is used to determine the specific ABI to use when generating code for the target platform. Here is an example of what the next statement of this code snippet might look like: ``` uint8" LLVM,RISCV,47,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return new AsmBackend(T, STI, MRI, Options);` This is a factory method that creates a new instance of the `MCAsmBackend` class for the specified ISA (Instruction Set Architecture). The `create` method takes four arguments: the `Target` object, the `MCSubtargetInfo` object, the `MCRegisterInfo` object, and the `MCTargetOptions` object. These objects are used to configure the `MCAsmBackend` instance." LLVM,RISCV,48,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `if ( ! AUIPCTarget . getSymA ( ) || AUIPCTarget . getSymB ( ) ) return false ;` This statement checks if the symbol reference in the `AUIPCTarget` variable is fully resolved. If the symbol reference is not fully resolved, the function returns `false`." LLVM,RISCV,49,"Based on the code snippet you provided, it appears to be a part of a function that is checking the validity of a fixup. The function is returning `true` if the fixup is not resolved and was not forced, and `false` otherwise. The next statement in the code snippet is `int64_t Offset = int64_t ( Value ) ;`, which is declaring a variable `Offset` and initializing it with the value of `Value` converted to an `int64_t`. It's not possible to predict the next statement with certainty without" LLVM,RISCV,50,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `Type = llvm::StringSwitch(Name).Case(, ELF::R__NONE).Case(, ELF::R__32).Case(, ELF::R__64).Default(-);` This is a C++ code snippet that uses the `StringSwitch` class from the LLVM library" LLVM,RISCV,51,"Based on the code snippet you provided, it appears to be defining an array of `MCFixupKindInfo` objects. The `MCFixupKindInfo` class is not a standard C++ class, so it's likely that this code is part of a larger project or framework. Without more context, it's difficult to say exactly what the code is doing, but based on the names of the variables and the values being assigned, it appears to be defining a set of constants that are used to represent different types of fixups in a machine code compiler. The `FKF_Is" LLVM,RISCV,52,"The next statement of this code snippet is: assert(Layout.getAssembler().getContext().getAsmInfo()->getMinInstAlignment() == && );" LLVM,RISCV,53,"Based on the code snippet provided, it is difficult to predict the next statement with certainty. However, based on the context and the patterns present in the code, it is likely that the next statement will be another `if` statement or a call to a function. The code snippet appears to be part of a function that is responsible for generating debug information for a program. The function takes a `Value` parameter and performs a series of checks on it to determine how to encode the value in the debug information. The checks involve testing whether the value is a certain size (e.g. 8 bits, 1" LLVM,RISCV,54,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific values of the constants and variables used in the code. However, based on the structure of the code, it appears that the next statement will be a case statement, possibly with a similar structure to the previous case statements. The code is using a switch statement to handle different opcodes, and each case statement is handling a specific opcode. The default case is unreachable, and the other cases are handling different opcodes. The code is also using a variable called ""Res"" to store the result of" LLVM,RISCV,55,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific values of the variables and the behavior of the `Inst` and `Res` objects. However, based on the code provided, it appears that the next statement will be: `Res.addOperand(Inst.getOperand());` This is because the previous statement in the `switch` block was `case :`, which means that the next statement will be executed if the value of `Inst.getOperand(] || ForceRelocs; ```" LLVM,RISCV,57,"This code snippet is a part of a function named `shouldInsertExtraNopBytesForCodeAlign` in the `AsmBackend` class. The function takes two parameters: a reference to a `MCAlignFragment` object named `AF`, and an unsigned integer named `Size`. The function first checks if a certain feature is enabled by calling the `getFeatureBits` method on the `STI` object. If the feature is not enabled, the function returns `false`. The next statement in the code snippet is: ``` bool HasStdExtC = STI" LLVM,RISCV,58,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `Ctx.addFixup(MCExpr::create(AF.getContents().size(), Ctx), MCExpr::create(Count, Ctx), MCFixupKind(MCFixupKind::FK_CodeAlign));` This statement adds a fixup to the assembler's fixup list, which will be used to insert extra nop bytes into the assembly code to ensure that the code is aligned to the specified alignment value. The fixup is created using the `MCExpr::create` function, which creates" LLVM,RISCV,59,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `Asm.addFixup (Fixup);`" LLVM,RISCV,60,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `if (Count % MinNopLen != 0) return false;` Explanation: The code snippet is a method named `writeNopData` that takes a `raw_ostream` object, a `uint64_t` object, and a `const MCSubtargetInfo*` object as input. The method checks if the `Count` parameter is a multiple of the minimum NOP length, which is determined by the `HasStdExtC` variable. If the `Count` parameter is not a multiple of the minimum" LLVM,RISCV,61,"The next statement in the code snippet is: `if (HasStdExtC) {`" LLVM,RISCV,62,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `if (HasStdExtC) {` This is because the `writeNopData` function is checking if the `HasStdExtC` flag is set to true, and if it is, it will write the NOP data to the output stream. If the flag is not set, the function will return without writing any data." LLVM,RISCV,63,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the code depends on the specific values of the variables and the implementation of the functions called. However, based on the context and the patterns in the code, it is likely that the next statement will be a case statement for another value of the `Kind` enum." LLVM,RISCV,64,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet without knowing the context in which it is being used. The code appears to be part of a larger program that is performing bitwise operations on a value. The code uses a series of case statements to perform different operations on the value based on its type. The cases are labeled with string literals, which suggests that the code is using a form of type-safe programming. Without more information, it is not possible to determine the exact behavior of the code or what the next statement will be. However, based on the patterns in the code," LLVM,RISCV,65,"The next statement in this code snippet is likely to be a `case` statement, as it appears to be part of a `switch` statement. The `switch` statement is checking the value of `T->getKind()`, and the next `case` statement will likely be for a specific value of `T->getKind()`. Without more context, it is not possible to predict the exact value that will be checked in the next `case` statement." LLVM,RISCV,66,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `Size = AF.getAlignment() - MinNopLen;` This statement assigns the value of `AF.getAlignment() - MinNopLen` to the variable `Size`. The value of `MinNopLen` is determined by the value of `HasStdExtC`, which is a boolean value that indicates whether the target instruction set architecture has the standard extension C feature. If `HasStdExtC` is true, then `MinNopLen` is set to 4, otherwise it is set to 2. The" LLVM,RISCV,67,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific values of the variables and functions involved. However, we can make an educated guess based on the information provided. The code snippet appears to be part of a function that is calculating the size of a data structure or object, based on the alignment of the structure and the minimum number of no-operation (NOP) instructions required to align the structure. The first line of the code snippet sets the minimum NOP length to a value based on the value of the `HasStdExtC` variable" LLVM,RISCV,68,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet without knowing the context and the purpose of the code. However, based on the syntax and the variables used, it appears that the code is related to the creation and manipulation of machine code instructions. The first line of the code creates a new `MCFixup` object with the specified parameters. The `MCFixup` class is likely a part of a machine code generation library, and it represents a fixup, which is a reference to a location in the code that needs to be updated with a specific value. The `create` method is" LLVM,RISCV,69,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `MCInst & Res = Inst.relax(STI);`" LLVM,RISCV,70,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `STI` class and the value of the `` constant. However, based on the syntax and the context in which this code appears, it is likely that the next statement will be an expression that evaluates to a boolean value. The `STI.getFeatureBits()` method is likely to return a bit vector representing the features of the current instruction, and the `` constant is likely to be a string literal that represents the name of" LLVM,RISCV,71,"Based on the code snippet you provided, it appears to be a part of a switch statement that is handling different cases for a fixup value. The code is checking the value of the fixup and performing various bitwise operations on it to generate a new value. Without knowing the specific context and the values of the constants used in the code, it is difficult to predict the exact output of the code. However, based on the patterns in the code, it appears to be performing bitwise operations on the fixup value to extract specific bits and then combining them to form a new value. The code is also" LLVM,RISCV,72,The next statement after `return false ;` is `case :`. LLVM,RISCV,73,"Based on the code snippet you provided, it appears to be a definition of an array of structs in C++. The struct is called `MCFixupKindInfo` and it has four members: a string literal, three numerical literals, and a bitwise OR of two enumeration values. The code snippet you provided defines an array of 32 `MCFixupKindInfo` structs, each with a different set of values for the four members. It's not possible to predict the next statement of the code snippet without knowing the context in which it is being used. However, based" LLVM,RISCV,74,"Based on the code snippet you provided, it seems like the next statement will be: `case : return ;` This is because the code is using a `switch` statement to handle different cases, and the next case after the one you provided is a string literal. The `return` statement is used to return a value from the function, and the value being returned is another string literal." LLVM,RISCV,75,"Based on the code snippet provided, it appears to be a part of a switch statement that is handling different cases for different types of instructions. The next statement is likely to be the next case in the switch statement. The current case is handling instructions with the opcode , and the next case is likely to handle instructions with a different opcode. The next case is likely to be a case statement with a different opcode, such as or . It's important to note that without more context, it's difficult to" LLVM,RISCV,76,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `case FK_Data_1: case FK_Data_2: case FK_Data_4: case FK_Data_8:` This is a switch statement that checks the value of `Fixup.getTargetKind()` and executes the corresponding case statement. The `FK_Data_1`, `FK_Data_2`, `FK_Data_4`, and `FK_Data_8` are the possible values of `Fixup.getTargetKind()`, and the code inside the corresponding case statement will be executed" LLVM,RISCV,77,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the code depends on the specific values of the variables and the implementation of the functions called. However, based on the information provided, it appears that the code is handling different cases for different types of fixups, and is performing various bitwise operations on the `Value` variable. The specific operations performed depend on the type of fixup and the values of the variables. It is also worth noting that the code appears to be using a technique called ""bit-banging"" to perform the fixups." LLVM,RISCV,78,"The next statement of this code snippet is: case : { if ( ! isInt < > ( Value ) ) Ctx . reportError ( Fixup . getLoc ( ) , ) ; if ( Value & ) Ctx . reportError ( Fixup . getLoc ( ) , ) ; unsigned Sbit = ( Value >> ) & ; unsigned Hi8 = ( Value >> " LLVM,RISCV,79,The next statement after the `switch` block is `break;`. LLVM,RISCV,80,"Based on the code snippet you provided, it appears to be a switch statement that is handling different cases for a fixup value. The cases are checking for specific values of the fixup and performing different operations based on those values. The next statement in the code snippet is: case : { if ( ! isInt < > ( Value ) ) Ctx . reportError ( Fixup . getLoc ( ) , ) ; if ( Value & ) Ctx . reportError ( Fixup ." LLVM,RISCV,81,The next statement after the `default` case is the `case FK_Data_1` statement. LLVM,RISCV,82,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be a loop that iterates over the data bytes and performs some operation on them. The loop will start at the offset specified by the `Offset` variable and will iterate for the number of bytes specified by the `NumBytes` variable. The loop will likely use the `Value` variable to perform some operation on each byte of data. The exact operation will depend on the specific implementation of the `adjustFixupValue` function and the `Info` variable. It's also worth noting that the code snippet includes an assertion to ensure that the" LLVM,RISCV,83,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `if (Info.Flags & MCFixupKindInfo::FKF_IsPCRel) {`" LLVM,RISCV,84,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return createELFObjectWriter(OS, OSABI, Is64Bit);` This statement creates a new instance of the `ISA_LIT` class, passing the `OS` and `OSABI` parameters to the constructor. The `Is64Bit` parameter is also passed to the constructor, but it is not used in the code snippet you provided. The `createELFObjectWriter` function is a template function that creates a new instance of" LLVM,RISCV,85,"Based on the code snippet you provided, it appears to be a part of a function that is performing some bitwise operations on a value. The function is checking the value of certain bits in the input value and performing different operations based on the values of those bits. It is difficult to predict the next statement of the code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific values of the constants and the input value. However, based on the pattern of the code, it is likely that the next statement will be another bitwise operation on the value, possibly using the bitwise AND operator (&) to extract the value" LLVM,RISCV,86,"Based on the code snippet you provided, it appears to be a C function that is performing some bitwise operations on a 32-bit integer value. The function takes a string literal as input and performs different operations based on the value of the string literal. The first case statement checks if the string literal is equal to ""Sbit"", and if so, it performs a bitwise shift operation on the value. The second case statement checks if the string literal is equal to ""Mid6"", and if so, it performs a bitwise shift operation on the value. The third case statement checks if the string literal" LLVM,RISCV,87,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `Data[Offset + i] |= uint8_t((Value >> (i * 8)) & 0xFF);` Explanation: The code snippet is a loop that iterates over the bytes in a buffer, starting from the `Offset` index and ending at the `FullSize` index. The loop body sets each byte in the buffer to the result of a bitwise OR operation between the current byte and a byte extracted from the `Value` variable. The byte is extracted by shifting the `Value` variable by `" LLVM,RISCV,88,"The next statement is: `Data[Offset + i] = [i % .size()];`" LLVM,RISCV,89,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `MCAsmBackend *backend = llvm::createAsmBackend(T, STI, MRI, Options);`" LLVM,RISCV,90,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be a `return` statement, as the `if` statement is checking if `Kind` is less than `FirstTargetFixupKind`, and if it is, it will return the result of `MCAsmBackend::getFixupKindInfo(Kind)`." LLVM,RISCV,91,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return Infos[Kind - FirstTargetFixupKind];` This statement returns the `MCFixupKindInfo` object at the index `Kind - FirstTargetFixupKind` in the `Infos` array. The `Kind` parameter is a value of type `MCFixupKind`, which is an enumeration of fixup kinds. The `FirstTargetFixupKind` constant is a value of type `MCFixupKind` that represents the first target-specific fixup kind. By subtracting `First" LLVM,RISCV,92,"The next statement in this code snippet is: return ;" LLVM,RISCV,93,"The next statement in the code snippet is: `return Value;`" LLVM,RISCV,94,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific values of the variables and the behavior of the functions called. However, based on the structure of the code, it appears that the next statement will be a case statement, possibly with a label such as `case `. The code appears to be using a switch statement to handle different cases, and the next case will likely be determined by the value of the `Value` variable." LLVM,RISCV,95,"The next statement after the `if` block is `return None ;`. The `if` block is checking if the `Type` variable is not equal to `- `. If it is not equal, then the `static_cast` expression is evaluated and the result is returned. If the `Type` variable is equal to `- `, then the `return None ;` statement is executed and the function returns `None`." LLVM,RISCV,96,The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be a `switch` statement or a series of `if` statements that check the value of `Name` and return a corresponding `MCFixupKind` value. The `getFixupKind` function is likely to be used to determine the type of fixup that should be applied to a specific instruction or operand in the assembly code. LLVM,RISCV,97,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `MCAsmBackend::MCAsmBackend(const MCSubtargetInfo &STI, uint8_t OSABI, bool Is64Bit, const MCTargetOptions &Options)` This is the constructor of the `MCAsmBackend` class, which is called by the constructor of the `AsmBackend` class. The constructor takes the same arguments as the `AsmBackend` constructor, and it initializes the `MCAsmBackend` object with the same values. The next statement" LLVM,RISCV,98,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `MCAsmBackend::MCAsmBackend(const MCSubtargetInfo &STI, uint8_t OSABI, bool Is64Bit, const MCTargetOptions &Options)` This is the constructor of the `MCAsmBackend` class, which is called by the constructor of the `AsmBackend` class. The constructor takes the same arguments as the `AsmBackend` constructor, and it initializes the `MCAsmBackend` object with the same values. The next statement" LLVM,RISCV,99,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return MCAsmBackend::getFixupKindInfo(Kind);` This statement is reached if `Kind` is less than `FirstTargetFixupKind`, which is the first element of the `Infos` array. In this case, the function `getFixupKindInfo` is called with the value of `Kind` as its argument, and the result is returned. Note that the `static_assert` statement at the end of the code snippet checks that the length of the `Infos` array is equal to" LLVM,RISCV,100,"Based on the code snippet you provided, the next statement would be: case : The switch statement is checking the value of `Fixup.getKind()` and executing different blocks of code based on the value. The first case is `default`, which means that if the value of `Fixup.getKind()` is not one of the other cases, the code will execute the block of code in the `default` case. The second case is ``, which means that if the value of `Fixup.getKind()` is ` ; -- i ) OW -> write16 ( ) ;" LLVM,RISCV,104,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be the start of a function definition, specifically the `applyFixup` function. The function is defined as a member of the `AsmBackend` class, and it takes several parameters: * `Fixup`: a reference to a `MCFixup` object, which represents a fixup in the assembly code. * `Data`: a pointer to a buffer of data, which is the data that the fixup is being applied to. * `DataSize`: the size of the data buffer. * `Value`: the value" LLVM,RISCV,105,"This code snippet is from the LLVM project and is related to the assembly backend for a specific target. The function `shouldInsertExtraNopBytesForCodeAlign` is checking whether extra NOP (no operation) bytes should be inserted for code alignment. The function takes two arguments: `AF`, which is an instance of the `MCAlignFragment` class, and `Size`, which is an unsigned integer. The function first retrieves the subtarget information from `AF` using the `getSubtargetInfo` method. It then checks if the target has the feature bit for the ""std.ext" LLVM,RISCV,106,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `Asm.getStreamer().EmitValue(NopBytes, Fixup, SMLoc());` This statement is emitting a value to the streamer, using the `NopBytes` value and the `Fixup` object as arguments. The `SMLoc()` argument is an empty location object, which is used to indicate that the location of the value is not known." LLVM,RISCV,107,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `Asm.getWriter().recordRelocation(Asm, Layout, &AF, Fixup, NopBytes, FixedValue);` This statement records a relocation in the object file being generated by the assembler. The `recordRelocation` method is called on the `MCWriter` object returned by `Asm.getWriter()`, and it takes the following arguments: * `Asm`: The `MCAsm` object representing the assembler. * `Layout`: The `MCLayout` object representing the layout of the" LLVM,RISCV,108,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific values of the variables and the behavior of the functions called. However, based on the context, it appears that the code is trying to retrieve information about a fixup kind. The `getFixupKindInfo` function is called with the `Kind` parameter, which is a value of the `MCFixupKind` enum. The function returns a `MCFixupKindInfo` object, which contains information about the fixup kind. The code then checks if the `Kind`" LLVM,RISCV,109,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `case : ShouldForce = T -> getValue ( ) -> findAssociatedFragment ( ) != Fixup . getValue ( ) -> findAssociatedFragment ( ) ; break ;` This is because the `switch` statement is checking the value of `T -> getTargetKind ( )`, and the next case after `default` is `case `." LLVM,RISCV,110,"The next statement in the code snippet is: `unsigned Bit11 = ( Value >> ) & ;` This line of code is part of the `case :` block, which is handling the `LDR` instruction. The `Bit11` variable is being assigned the value of the 11th bit of the `Value` variable, which is the immediate value of the instruction. The `& ` operator is used to mask off the lower 11 bits of the `Value" LLVM,RISCV,111,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be the implementation of the `applyFixup` method, which is a member function of the `AsmBackend` class. The method takes in a `MCFixup` object, a `MutableArrayRef` object, a `uint64_t` value, a `bool` flag indicating whether the fixup is PC-relative, and a `MCContext` object. The method is expected to apply the fixup to the data in the `MutableArrayRef` object, using the `Value` and `IsPCRel` parameters to determine" LLVM,RISCV,112,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the code depends on the specific values of the variables and the inputs to the function. However, based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the function is performing some bitwise operations on the input value, and the next statement is likely to be another bitwise operation or a return statement. Without more information about the specific implementation of the function, it is not possible to provide a more detailed prediction of the next statement." LLVM,RISCV,113,"Based on the code snippet you provided, it appears to be a switch statement that is handling different types of fixups for a linker. The next statement in the switch statement would be: case : { if ( ! isInt < > ( Value ) ) Ctx . reportError ( Fixup . getLoc ( ) , ) ; if ( Value & ) Ctx . reportError ( Fixup . getLoc ( ) , ) ; unsigned Sbit = ( Value >>" LLVM,RISCV,114,"The next statement of this code snippet is: for (unsigned i = 0; i < NumBytes; ++i) { Data[Offset + i] |= uint8_t((Value >> (i * 8)) & 0xFF); }" LLVM,RISCV,115,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return createELFObjectWriter(OSABI, Is64Bit);` This statement creates a new instance of the `ISA_LIT` class, which is a subclass of `MCObjectTargetWriter`. The `create` method is called with the `OSABI` and `Is64Bit` parameters, which are used to initialize the new instance. The `create` method returns a pointer to the new instance, which is then returned by the `createObjectTargetWriter` method." LLVM,RISCV,116,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `uint8_t OSABI = MCELFObjectTargetWriter::getOSABI(TT.getOS());` This statement assigns the value returned by the `getOSABI` method of the `MCELFObjectTargetWriter` class to the `OSABI` variable. The `getOSABI` method takes the operating system (OS) of the target triple as an argument, and returns the OSABI (Operating System ABI) value for that OS. The `TT.getOS()` method" LLVM,RISCV,117,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the implementation of the `STI` object and the `getTargetTriple()` method. However, based on the naming conventions and the context of the code, it is likely that the next statement will be a call to a method or function that takes the `TT` object as an argument, and performs some operation on it." LLVM,RISCV,118,"Based on the code snippet you provided, the next statement would be: `case :` This is because the code is checking the value of `Fixup.getKind()` and if it is equal to ``, it will execute the code inside the `case` statement." LLVM,RISCV,119,"Based on the code snippet you provided, it appears to be a part of a function called `getRelaxedOpcode` that is defined in a class called `AsmBackend`. The function takes an unsigned integer `Op` as input and returns a relaxed version of the opcode. The function uses a `switch` statement to check the value of `Op` and return a different value depending on the case. The `default` case returns the original value of `Op`, while the other cases return specific values. Without more context, it is difficult to predict the exact output of the" LLVM,RISCV,120,"Based on the code snippet you provided, it appears to be a method called `getRelaxedOpcode` that is part of a class called `AsmBackend`. The method takes an unsigned integer `Op` as input and returns a modified version of the input based on the value of `Op`. The method uses a switch statement to check the value of `Op` and return a different value based on the case. The possible cases are: * `default`: The method returns the original value of `Op`. * ``: The method returns the string literal ` ) return false ;` This is because the previous statement, `unsigned MinNopLen = HasStdExtC ? : ;`, sets the value of `MinNopLen` based on the value of `HasStdExtC`. If `HasStdExtC` is true, then `MinNopLen` is set to ``. Otherwise, it is set to" LLVM,RISCV,126,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `Inst.addOperand(MCOperand::createImm(Expr->getValue()));` This is because the `else if` block is executed when `Expr` is not equal to ``, and `Expr` is a `MCConstantExpr` object. Therefore, the `getValue()` method is called on `Expr` to get its value, and the result is passed to the `createImm()` method to create a new `MCOperand` object." LLVM,RISCV,127,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific values of the variables and the behavior of the `addOperand` method. However, based on the code snippet provided, it is likely that the next statement will be: `Inst.addOperand(MCOperand::createImm(Expr));` This is because the `addOperand` method is called with the `MCOperand::createImm` method, which creates an immediate operand with the value of the expression `Expr`. The `Expr` variable is" LLVM,RISCV,128,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `Inst.addOperand(MCOperand::createImm(N));` This statement adds an immediate operand to the instruction `Inst` with the value `N`. The `assert` statement checks that `N` is equal to the expected number of immediate operands (``) and that the string literal (``) is not empty. If the assertion fails, the program will terminate with an error message." LLVM,RISCV,129,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the implementation of the `addExpr` and `getImm` functions. However, based on the names of the functions, it is likely that the next statement will be an expression that adds the result of the `getImm` function to the `Inst` object." LLVM,RISCV,130,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `assert ( N == && ) ;` This statement is an assertion that checks whether the value of `N` is equal to `` and whether the value of `` is non-empty. If either of these conditions is not met, the assertion will fail and an error message will be displayed." LLVM,RISCV,131,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `make_unique` function and the types of the `Operand` and `KindImm` classes. However, based on the syntax and the names of the variables, it is likely that the next statement will be an assignment to the `Op` variable, such as: `Op = make_unique < Operand > ( KindImm , StartLoc , EndLoc ) ;` This statement would create a new instance of the `Oper" LLVM,RISCV,132,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be: `return Op;` This is because the `createImm` function is creating a new instance of the `Operand` class, and the `Op` variable is a unique pointer to this instance. The function is initializing the `Op` variable with the `KindImm` value and the `StartLoc` and `EndLoc` values, and then setting the `Imm` field of the `Op` variable to the `Expr` parameter. Finally, the function is returning the `Op` variable, which is a unique pointer" LLVM,RISCV,133,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `Op->Mem.Disp = Disp;`" LLVM,RISCV,134,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific values of the variables `Op`, `Mem`, `RegKind`, `Base`, and `Index`. However, based on the syntax and the fact that the code is setting the `RegKind`, `Base`, and `Index` fields of the `Mem` structure, it is likely that the next statement will be a similar assignment to one of the other fields of the `Mem` structure." LLVM,RISCV,135,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return Op;`" LLVM,RISCV,136,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `make_unique` function and the `Operand` class. However, based on the code snippet you provided, it appears that the next statement is likely to be a call to the `Token` member function of the `Op` object, which is an instance of the `Operand` class. The `Token` member function is not defined in the code snippet you provided, so it is not possible to determine what it does or what its return value is. However, based on the" LLVM,RISCV,137,"The next statement of this code snippet is: return Imm;" LLVM,RISCV,138,"The next statement of this code snippet is: return Reg;" LLVM,RISCV,139,"The next statement after the `return` statement in the code snippet you provided is the end of the function. The function is returning a `StringRef` object, which is a reference to a string. The `StringRef` constructor is being called with two arguments: `Token.Data` and `Token.Length`. These arguments are used to create a new `StringRef` object that refers to the same string as the `Token` object. Therefore, the next statement after the `return` statement is the end of the function, and the function will return the `StringRef` object that was" LLVM,RISCV,140,"The next statement after the `return` statement in the code snippet you provided is the end of the function. The function is returning a `StringRef` object, which is a reference to a string. The `StringRef` constructor is being called with two arguments: `Token.Data` and `Token.Length`. These arguments are used to create a new `StringRef` object that refers to the same string as the `Token` object. Therefore, the next statement after the `return` statement is the end of the function, and the function will return the `StringRef` object that was" LLVM,RISCV,141,"The next statement after the code snippet you provided is: `return Value >= MinValue && Value <= MaxValue;` This statement is a boolean expression that checks whether the value of `Value` is greater than or equal to `MinValue` and less than or equal to `MaxValue`. If the condition is true, the function will return `true`, otherwise it will return `false`." LLVM,RISCV,142,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `isReg` function and the value of the `ER64Reg` variable. However, based on the name of the function and the variable, it is likely that the `isReg` function checks whether the value of `ER64Reg` is a valid register number for a 64-bit register. If the value is valid, the function may return `true`, otherwise it may return `false`. Therefore, the next statement of this code snippet could" LLVM,RISCV,143,"The next statement of this code snippet is: return isReg(FP128Reg);" LLVM,RISCV,144,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `isReg` function and the values of the `FP32Reg` constant. However, based on the name of the function and the constant, it is likely that the next statement will check if the current register is a 32-bit floating-point register. Here is a possible next statement: ``` return isReg(FP32Reg) && (getRegType() == FP32Reg); ``` This statement checks if the current register is a" LLVM,RISCV,145,"The next statement after `return isReg ( FP32Reg ) ;` would be the end of the function, as there are no more statements after this line. So, the next statement would be the end of the function, which is typically indicated by a closing curly brace `}`." LLVM,RISCV,146,"The next statement after `return isReg ( FP64Reg ) ;` would be the next line of code after the `if` block. Since there is no code after the `if` block, the next statement would be the end of the function." LLVM,RISCV,147,"The next statement after `return isReg ( GR64Reg ) ;` would be the statement that follows the `if` block. Since there is no statement after the `if` block, the next statement would be the statement that follows the `if` statement. In this case, the next statement would be the statement that follows the `if` statement, which is the `else` statement. Therefore, the next statement of this code snippet would be: ``` else { // code to execute if the condition is not met } ```" LLVM,RISCV,148,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return ( Kind == KindMem && Mem . RegKind == RegKind && ( HasIndex || ! Mem . Index ) ) ;` This statement is a return statement that returns a boolean value indicating whether the current register is a memory register. The return value is determined by the values of the `Kind` and `Mem` fields, as well as the `HasIndex` parameter. If the `Kind` field is equal to `KindMem` and the `Mem` field's `RegKind` field is equal to the `RegKind` parameter," LLVM,RISCV,149,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return isMem(RegKind, HasIndex) && inRange(Mem.Disp, -20, 20);` Explanation: The `isMem` function checks if the register kind is a memory operand, and the `HasIndex` parameter indicates whether the memory operand has an index register. If the memory operand is not valid, the function returns false. The `inRange` function checks if the displacement value of the memory operand is within the specified range. In this case, the range" LLVM,RISCV,150,"The next statement after `return isReg ( PairFP128Reg ) ;` would be the statement that follows the `if` block. Since there is no statement after the `if` block, the next statement would be the statement that follows the `if` block. In this case, there is no statement after the `if` block, so the next statement would be the statement that follows the `if` block. It's important to note that the `return` statement is used to return a value from a function, and it should be used at the end of the function." LLVM,RISCV,151,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the function is dependent on the specific implementation of the `isPairFP128` function. However, based on the name of the function and the fact that it is a member function of a class, it is likely that the function is used to determine whether a pair of floating-point numbers is a valid pair for some purpose. Without more information about the specific implementation of the function, it is not possible to provide a more specific prediction about the next statement of the code snippet." LLVM,RISCV,152,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the code depends on the specific implementation of the `isPairFP64` function. However, based on the name of the function and the fact that it is a member function of a class, it is likely that the function is used to determine whether a pair of floating-point numbers is equal to a certain value. Without more information about the specific implementation of the `isPairFP64` function, it is not possible to provide a more detailed prediction of the next statement of the code snippet." LLVM,RISCV,153,"The next statement of this code snippet is: return isReg(PCR64Reg);" LLVM,RISCV,154,"The next statement of this code snippet is: return isReg(PCR64Reg);" LLVM,RISCV,155,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `isReg` function and the value of `PCReg`. However, based on the name of the function and the variable, it is likely that the next statement will be a check to see if `PCReg` is a valid register." LLVM,RISCV,156,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `isReg` function and the value of `PCRReg`. However, based on the name of the function and the variable, it is likely that the next statement will be a comparison or a check of some kind, possibly involving the `PCRReg` variable." LLVM,RISCV,157,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific values of the variables `Kind`, `Reg`, and `RegKind`. However, based on the syntax and the fact that the code is checking the equality of `Kind` and `RegKind`, it is likely that the next statement will be a comparison of `Kind` and `RegKind`." LLVM,RISCV,158,"The next statement of this code snippet is: return isImm( - , ); This statement is a function call to the `isImm` function, which takes two arguments: a negative number and a positive number. The function returns a boolean value indicating whether the first argument is an immediate value (i.e., a constant) or not." LLVM,RISCV,159,"The next statement of this code snippet is: return isImm( - , ); This statement is a function call to the `isImm` function, which takes two arguments: a negative number and a positive number. The function returns a boolean value indicating whether the first argument is an immediate value (i.e., a constant) or not." LLVM,RISCV,160,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the `isToken` method is dependent on the implementation of the `Token` class and the specific input it is being called with. However, based on the name of the method and the fact that it is declared as a `const` method, it is likely that the method is checking whether a given input is a valid token or not. The method may be using some internal state or logic to determine this, and the next statement could be a check or a comparison of some kind. Without more information" LLVM,RISCV,161,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the context in which the code is being executed. However, based on the syntax and the fact that the `Kind` variable is being compared to `KindToken`, it is likely that the next statement will be a conditional statement that checks the value of `Kind` and performs some action based on that value." LLVM,RISCV,162,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be the evaluation of the `isImm` function with the two numeric literals as arguments. The `isImm` function is not defined in the code snippet provided, so it is not possible to determine its exact behavior. However, based on the name of the function and the fact that it is being called with two numeric literals as arguments, it is likely that the function is used to determine whether a given number is an immediate value (i.e., a value that can be stored directly in a register). Therefore, the next statement of" LLVM,RISCV,163,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be the evaluation of the `isImm` function with the two numeric literals as arguments. The `isImm` function is not defined in the code snippet provided, so it is not possible to determine its exact behavior. However, based on the name of the function and the fact that it is being called with two numeric literals as arguments, it is likely that the function is used to determine whether a given number is an immediate value (i.e., a value that can be stored directly in a register). Therefore, the next statement of" LLVM,RISCV,164,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the `isU32Imm` function depends on the specific implementation of the `Imm` class and the values of the `Imm` object's member variables. However, based on the name of the function and the fact that it is a member function of the `Imm` class, it is likely that the function returns a boolean value indicating whether the `Imm` object represents a 32-bit immediate value. Therefore, a possible next statement of this code snippet" LLVM,RISCV,165,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be the evaluation of the `isImm` function with the two numeric literals as arguments. The `isImm` function is not defined in the code snippet provided, so it is not possible to determine its exact behavior. However, based on the name of the function and the fact that it is being called with two numeric literals as arguments, it is likely that the function is used to determine whether a given number is an immediate value (i.e., a value that can be stored directly in a register). Therefore, the next statement of" LLVM,RISCV,166,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the code depends on the specific implementation of the `isU4Imm` function and the input data. However, based on the name of the function and the fact that it is a member function of a class, it is likely that the function is used to determine whether a given value is a valid immediate value for a 4-bit unsigned integer. Therefore, the next statement of the code snippet is likely to be a comparison or a logical operation that checks whether the value returned by the `is" LLVM,RISCV,167,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be the implementation of the `isImm()` function, which is called by the `isU64Imm()` function. The `isImm()` function is likely to take two arguments, `min` and `max`, and return a boolean value indicating whether the immediate value is within the specified range. Here's an example of how the `isImm()` function might be implemented: ``` bool isImm(int min, int max) { return (min <= imm && imm <= max); } ```" LLVM,RISCV,168,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be the evaluation of the `isImm` function with the two numeric literals as arguments. The `isImm` function is not defined in the code snippet provided, so it is not possible to determine its exact behavior. However, based on the name of the function and the fact that it is being called with two numeric literals as arguments, it is likely that the function is used to determine whether a given number is an immediate value (i.e., a value that can be stored directly in a register). Therefore, the next statement of" LLVM,RISCV,169,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be a call to the `RegisterMCAsmParser` function, passing in the `AsmParser` object and the `Target` object as arguments. The `RegisterMCAsmParser` function is used to register an assembler parser with the LLVM IR system, so that it can be used to parse assembly code for the specified target. Here is an example of what the next statement might look like: ``` RegisterMCAsmParser(Y, The64Target); ``` This statement would register the" LLVM,RISCV,170,"Based on the code snippet you provided, it appears that the next statement will be: `case Match_MnemonicFail:` This is because the previous `case` statement was `Match_InvalidOperand`, and the next `case` statement after that is `Match_MnemonicFail`." LLVM,RISCV,171,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `ErrorLoc = ( ( Operand & ) * Operands [ ErrorInfo ] ) . getStartLoc ( ) ;` This statement is assigning the start location of the operand at index `ErrorInfo` in the `Operands` vector to the `ErrorLoc` variable. The operand is cast to the type `Operand` before being multiplied by the `ErrorInfo` index. The resulting value is then passed to the `getStartLoc()` method to retrieve the start location" LLVM,RISCV,172,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `if (getLexer()->is(AsmToken::RParen)) {`" LLVM,RISCV,173,"The next statement after the given code snippet is: `return false;` This is because the `ParseDirective` method is expected to return a boolean value indicating whether the directive was successfully parsed or not. In this case, the method is returning `true` to indicate that the directive was successfully parsed." LLVM,RISCV,174,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be the return statement, which returns the result of the `parseFP32` function. The function takes an `OperandVector` and an `Operand` as input, and returns an `OperandMatchResultTy`. The function calls the `parseRegister` function, which parses the register and returns the result. The `parseFP32` function then returns the result of the `parseRegister` function." LLVM,RISCV,175,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `parseRegister` function and the values of the variables `Operands`, `FP64Regs`, and `ISA_LIT`. However, based on the syntax and the fact that the function is called with the arguments `Operands`, `'f'`, `FP64Regs`, and `Operand :: FP64Reg`, it is likely that the next statement will be a call to the `parseRegister` function with these arguments." LLVM,RISCV,176,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be the return statement, which returns the result of the `parseFP64` function. The function takes an `OperandVector` and an `ISA_LIT` as input, and returns an `OperandMatchResultTy` object. The function calls the `parseRegister` function, which is not shown in this code snippet, and returns the result of that function." LLVM,RISCV,177,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `parseRegister` function and the values of the variables `Operands`, `GR32Regs`, and `ISA_LIT`. However, based on the syntax and the context of the code, it is likely that the next statement will be a call to the `parseRegister` function with the same arguments as the previous call, but with a different value for the `reg` parameter." LLVM,RISCV,178,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be the return statement, which returns the result of the `parseRegister` function call. The `parseRegister` function takes four arguments: * `Operands`: a reference to the `OperandVector` object that contains the operands to be parsed. * `'x'`: a character that represents the type of register to be parsed (in this case, a 32-bit general-purpose register). * `GR32Regs`: a reference to the `GR32Reg` object that contains the list of 3" LLVM,RISCV,179,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `SMLoc` class and the `Parser` class. However, based on the syntax and the names of the methods used, it is likely that the next statement will be an assignment to a variable or a method call. Here are a few possibilities: * `SMLoc EndLoc = SMLoc :: getFromPointer ( Parser . getTok ( ) . getLoc ( ) . getPointer ( ) - ) ;` *" LLVM,RISCV,180,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `MatchOperandParserImpl` function and the values of the `Operands` and `Mnemonic` variables. However, based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the function is attempting to match an operand against a mnemonic, and if the match is successful, the function returns `false`. If the match fails, the function returns `true`. Therefore, the next statement of the code snippet is likely to be the assignment of the `Expr` variable to the" LLVM,RISCV,181,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be the return statement, which returns the result of the `parseRegister` function call. The `parseRegister` function is called with the `Operands` vector as its first argument, and the `PairFP128Regs` vector as its second argument. The third argument is a string literal that represents the name of the register, which is `Operand :: PairFP128Reg` in this case. The `parseRegister` function is responsible for parsing the register name and returning the corresponding register object" LLVM,RISCV,182,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return Error(Loc, );`" LLVM,RISCV,183,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific input and the behavior of the `equals_lower` method. However, based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the next statement will be an `else if` statement that checks if the identifier is equal to a specific string literal. If the identifier is equal to the string literal, the next statement will create a register operand using the `createReg` method of the `Operand` class." LLVM,RISCV,184,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific inputs and the behavior of the `Lex` and `parseRegister` functions. However, based on the code provided, it appears that the next statement will be: `Operands.push_back(std::move(op));` This statement adds the `op` object to the `Operands` vector, which is a list of operands that have been parsed from the input. The `std::move` function is used to move the `op` object into the `Operands" LLVM,RISCV,185,"The next statement after the given code snippet is: RegNo = GR32Regs[Reg.Number];" LLVM,RISCV,186,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `llvm_unreachable();` This statement is a call to the `llvm_unreachable` function, which is a part of the LLVM library. The function takes a string literal as an argument, which is the message to be printed when the function is called. In this case, the message is ``. The `llvm_unreachable` function is used to indicate that a particular code path is unreachable, and it is typically used" LLVM,RISCV,187,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `MCTargetAsmParser::MCTargetAsmParser(Options, sti);` This is a constructor call for the `MCTargetAsmParser` class, which is a subclass of `MCAsmParser`. The constructor takes two arguments: `Options` and `sti`. The `Options` argument is a reference to a `MCTargetOptions` object, which contains options for the target machine. The `sti` argument is a reference to a `MCSubtargetInfo` object, which contains information about the subtarget" LLVM,RISCV,188,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `MCAsmParserExtension::Initialize(Parser);` This statement calls the `Initialize` method of the `MCAsmParserExtension` class, passing in the `Parser` object as an argument. This method is used to initialize the `MCAsmParserExtension` object, which is used to parse assembly code for the target architecture." LLVM,RISCV,189,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `StartLoc ( startLoc ) , EndLoc ( endLoc ) {` This is a constructor for the `Operand` class, which initializes the `Kind`, `StartLoc`, and `EndLoc` members of the `Operand` object. The constructor takes three arguments: `kind`, `startLoc`, and `endLoc`, which are used to initialize the corresponding members of the `Operand` object." LLVM,RISCV,190,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `StartLoc ( startLoc ) , EndLoc ( endLoc ) {` This is a constructor for the `Operand` class, which initializes the `Kind`, `StartLoc`, and `EndLoc` members of the `Operand` object. The constructor takes three arguments: `kind`, `startLoc`, and `endLoc`, which are used to initialize the corresponding members of the `Operand` object." LLVM,RISCV,191,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be: `Inst.addOperand(MCOperand::createImm(SysReg.Encoding));` This is because the previous statement is an assertion that checks if the value of `N` is equal to a specific value (``) and if a certain string (``) is not empty. If the assertion passes, the next statement is executed, which adds an immediate operand to the instruction using the `MCOperand::createImm()` function." LLVM,RISCV,192,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the code depends on the specific values of the variables and the implementation of the `MCExpr` class. However, based on the information provided, it appears that the code is attempting to create an instance of the `MCExpr` class with a specific variant kind. The `VK__None` value is being assigned to the `VariantKind` field of the `MCExpr` instance, which suggests that the instance is being created with a variant kind of `None`." LLVM,RISCV,193,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `Inst.addOperand(MCOperand::createImm(Imm));` This is because the `if` statement checks if `IsConstant` is true, and if it is, it adds an immediate operand to the instruction using `MCOperand::createImm(Imm)`. If `IsConstant` is false, it adds an expression operand to the instruction using `MCOperand::createExpr(Expr)`." LLVM,RISCV,194,"Based on the code snippet provided, it appears to be a part of a function that is parsing a machine code expression and extracting information from it. The function is checking if the expression is a constant immediate value, and if so, it adds an operand to the instruction with the constant value. If the expression is not a constant immediate value, it casts the expression to a symbolic expression and extracts the symbol name. The function then iterates over the characters in the symbol name and performs a switch statement to determine the type of operand to add to the instruction. Based on this information, the next" LLVM,RISCV,195,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet without knowing the context and the purpose of the code. However, based on the syntax and the names of the functions and variables used, it appears that the code is related to the manipulation of machine code instructions and operands. The `Inst` object is being used to add an operand to the instruction, and the `MCOperand` class is being used to create an immediate operand with the value of the rounding mode. The `getRoundingMode()` function is being called to retrieve the current rounding mode, and the `create" LLVM,RISCV,196,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be the start of a loop that adds immediate operands to the instruction. The loop will iterate N times, and each iteration will add an immediate operand to the instruction. Here is a possible next statement: ``` for (unsigned i = 0; i < N; i++) { // Add an immediate operand to the instruction } ```" LLVM,RISCV,197,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be the execution of the `addExpr` function, which takes two arguments: `Inst` and the result of the `getImm` function. The `addExpr` function is not defined in the code snippet provided, so it is not possible to predict exactly what it will do. However, based on the name of the function, it is likely that it will add an expression to the `Inst` object." LLVM,RISCV,198,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `assert ( N == && ) ;` This statement is an assertion that checks whether the value of `N` is equal to `` and whether the value of `` is non-empty. If either of these conditions is not met, the assertion will fail and an error message will be displayed." LLVM,RISCV,199,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `assert ( N == && ) ;` This statement is an assertion that checks whether the value of `N` is equal to `` and whether the value of `` is non-empty. If either of these conditions is not met, the assertion will fail and an error message will be displayed." LLVM,RISCV,200,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be: `if (IsConstantImm) { ... }` This is because the previous line of code, `bool IsConstantImm = evaluateConstantImm ( getImm ( ) , Imm , VK ) ;`, assigns a value to the variable `IsConstantImm` based on the result of the `evaluateConstantImm` function. The next statement is likely to be a conditional statement that checks the value of `IsConstantImm` and performs some action based on that value." LLVM,RISCV,201,"This code snippet appears to be part of a function that is handling an error condition. The function is taking in a set of operands and an error location, and it is returning an error message. The first line of the code is creating a new location object called `ErrorLoc` by taking the start location of the first operand and multiplying it by the number of operands. This is likely a way to calculate the location of the error in the input stream. The second line is returning an error message that includes the error location and a string literal. The string literal is likely a description of the error" LLVM,RISCV,202,The next statement after the `if` block is `return false;`. LLVM,RISCV,203,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return false;` Explanation: The `classifySymbolRef` function is checking the kind of the `MCExpr` object passed as an argument. The function sets the `Kind` variable to `VK__None` and then returns `false`. This indicates that the symbol reference is not a valid instruction addressing mode." LLVM,RISCV,204,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `getSTI` and `getFeatureBits` methods, as well as the value of the `Feature` constant. However, based on the naming conventions used in the code snippet, it is likely that the next statement will be a call to a method that returns a value based on the feature bits. For example, it could be a call to a method that returns a boolean value indicating whether the feature is enabled or disabled, or a call to a method that returns a value" LLVM,RISCV,205,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return Reg - + ;` This statement is a return statement that returns the result of the expression `Reg - + `. The expression subtracts `` from `Reg` and then adds `` to the result. The return value of the function is the result of this expression." LLVM,RISCV,206,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return Reg - + ;` This statement is a return statement that returns the result of the expression `Reg - + `. The expression subtracts `` from `Reg` and then adds `` to the result. The return value of the function is the result of this expression." LLVM,RISCV,207,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return RI.getMatchingSuperReg(Reg, , &MCRegisterClasses[RegClassID]);` This statement is executed if the `Kind` variable is not equal to `MCK_VRM8`. It calls the `getMatchingSuperReg` method of the `RI` object, passing in the `Reg` variable, a string literal, and a reference to the `MCRegisterClasses` array element with the index `RegClassID`. The method returns a value" LLVM,RISCV,208,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be the assignment of the `Op` object to a variable or field, as the `return` statement is typically used to return a value from a function or method. For example, the next statement could be: ``` Op = new Op(StartLoc, EndLoc, IsRV64); ``` This would create a new `Op` object with the specified `StartLoc`, `EndLoc`, and `IsRV64` values, and assign it to the `Op` variable. Alternatively, the next statement" LLVM,RISCV,209,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be: `Op->setRegNo(RegNo);` This is because the `createReg` function is creating a new `Operand` object and setting its `RegNo` field to the value of the `RegNo` parameter. The `setRegNo` function is a member function of the `Operand` class that sets the value of the `RegNo` field." LLVM,RISCV,210,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `Op` class and the `SysReg` class. However, based on the code provided, it is likely that the next statement will be a call to a method of the `Op` class, such as `Op.execute()` or `Op.write()`, which will perform some operation on the data stored in the `SysReg` object." LLVM,RISCV,211,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `ISA_LIT` class and the `Operand` class, as well as the value of the `KindTy` variable. However, based on the code snippet you provided, it appears that the `Op` variable is being assigned a new instance of the `Operand` class, with the `KindTy` variable being used to specify the type of the operand. The `Tok` field of the `Operand` class is then being set to the value of" LLVM,RISCV,212,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be: Op -> EndLoc = E ; This is because the previous statement sets the `StartLoc` attribute of the `Op` object to `S`, and the next logical step would be to set the `EndLoc` attribute to `E`." LLVM,RISCV,213,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be: `Op->VType.Val = VTypeI;` This is because the previous statement in the code snippet is `auto Op = std::make_uniqueOperand>(KindTy::VType);`, which creates a unique pointer to an `ISA_LIT` operand object and initializes its `KindTy` field to `VType`. The next statement is likely to be assigning a value to the `VType` field of the `ISA_LIT` operand object." LLVM,RISCV,214,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return Operand :: createReg ( , llvm :: SMLoc ( ) , llvm :: SMLoc ( ) , isRV64 ( ) ) ;` This statement creates a new `ISA_LIT` operand object using the `createReg` method, passing in the string literal ``, two `llvm::SMLoc` objects, and the result of the `isRV64` function. The `createReg" LLVM,RISCV,215,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `emitToStreamer` function and the `MCInstBuilder` class. However, based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the next statement may be related to emitting a label or a symbol to a streamer. The `emitLabel` function is called with the `TmpLabel` symbol, which is a named temporary symbol created by the `createNamedTempSymbol` function. This suggests that the next statement may involve emitting a label or a symbol to the streamer" LLVM,RISCV,216,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `emitToStreamer` function and the `MCInstBuilder` class. However, based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the next statement may be related to emitting a label or a symbol to a streamer. The `emitLabel` function is called with the `TmpLabel` symbol, which is a named temporary symbol created by the `createNamedTempSymbol` function. This suggests that the next statement may involve emitting a label or a symbol to the streamer" LLVM,RISCV,217,"This code is part of a function called `emitLoadAddress` that is part of a class called `AsmParser`. The function is responsible for emitting a load address instruction. The code you provided is incomplete, so it's difficult to determine exactly what the next statement will be. However, based on the context, it appears that the next statement will be related to the `MCExpr` class and its `VariantKind` property." LLVM,RISCV,218,"Based on the code snippet provided, it is difficult to predict the next statement with certainty. However, based on the pattern of the code, it is likely that the next statement will be another case statement for a different value of `Inst.getOpndKind()`. The code appears to be using a switch statement to handle different types of instructions, with each case statement handling a different type of instruction. The code inside each case statement appears to be emitting a different type of instruction to a streamer, based on the values of the `Inst` object's `Opc`, `DestReg`, `Src" LLVM,RISCV,219,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the code depends on the specific values of the variables and the implementation of the `getOperand` method. However, based on the information provided, it is likely that the next statement will be a call to the `getOperand` method with the argument ``. This will retrieve the operand at the specified index in the instruction's operand list, and store it in the `DestReg` variable. It is also possible that the next statement will be a call to" LLVM,RISCV,220,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be the call to the `emitAuipcInstPair` function, which is used to emit an AUIPC instruction pair for the specified destination and temporary registers, symbol, and opcode. The function takes several arguments, including the destination and temporary registers, the symbol, the VK__PCREL_HI constant, the opcode, and the ID location. The function is likely to be defined in a separate file or library, and its implementation is not provided in the code snippet." LLVM,RISCV,221,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet without knowing the context and the specific implementation of the `Inst` class. However, based on the syntax and the name of the variables, it appears that the code is trying to retrieve the symbolic expression of an operand of an instruction. The `Inst` class is likely a class that represents an instruction in a computer program, and the `getOperand` method is likely a method that returns the operand of the instruction at a specific index. The `` placeholder is likely a placeholder for a numerical literal, which is a value" LLVM,RISCV,222,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet without knowing the specifics of the `emitAuipcInstPair` function and the context in which it is being called. However, based on the name of the function and the parameters being passed, it appears that the function is emitting a pair of instructions that perform an ""add immediate"" operation on the destination register, using a symbolic reference to a TLS (Thread-Local Storage) location. The first instruction in the pair is likely to be an ""add immediate"" instruction that adds a constant value to the destination register, and the second instruction" LLVM,RISCV,223,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet without knowing the specific values of the variables and the implementation of the `getOperand` and `getExpr` methods. However, based on the names of the variables and the methods being called, it appears that the code is working with a machine code instruction and is trying to retrieve the destination register and a symbolic expression representing the second operand of the instruction. The `isRV64` method is also being called to determine whether the instruction is for a 64-bit architecture. Without more information, it is not possible to predict" LLVM,RISCV,224,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be: `Out.emitRV64Inst(Inst, SecondOpcode, DestReg, SourceReg, ShAmt);` This is because the code snippet is setting up the parameters for an instruction to be emitted by the `MCStreamer` object `Out`, and the `emitRV64Inst` method is the most likely candidate for emitting an instruction with the specified parameters. The `SecondOpcode` parameter is set to either `` or `` depending on the value of `" LLVM,RISCV,225,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `Out.emitExtend (DestReg, SourceReg, SignExtend, Width, IDLoc);`" LLVM,RISCV,226,"The next statement after the code snippet you provided is likely to be a check of the `Res` variable, which is the return value of the `compressInst` function. Here's a possible next statement: ``` if (Res) { // Compression was successful } else { // Compression failed } ``` This code checks the value of `Res` and executes the code in the `if` block if the compression was successful, or the code in the `else` block if the compression failed." LLVM,RISCV,227,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `emitToStreamer(Out, MCInstBuilder(Opcode).addOperand(Inst.getOperand()).addOperand(Inst.getOperand()).addOperand(Inst.getOperand()).addOperand(Inst.getOperand()));` This statement is inside the `else if` block, which is executed when the number of operands of the instruction is equal to ` evaluateAsConstant(CE);` Explanation: The code snippet is part of a function that takes an expression `Expr` as an argument and returns a constant expression representing the result of evaluating `Expr` as a constant. The function uses the `dyn_cast` function to check if `Expr` is a constant expression, and if it is, it returns the result of evaluating `Expr` as a constant using the `evaluateAsConstant` function. If `Expr` is not a constant expression," LLVM,RISCV,229,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be the return statement, which returns an error message to the caller. The error message is constructed by concatenating several strings using the `+` operator. The strings are: * `ErrorLoc`: The location of the error. * `Msg`: The error message. * ``: A string literal that is not specified in the code snippet. * `Twine ( Lower )`: A string that is constructed by calling the `Twine` function with the `Lower` argument. * `Twine ( Upper )`: A" LLVM,RISCV,230,"The next statement of this code snippet is: return EndLoc;" LLVM,RISCV,231,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the context in which the code is being executed. However, based on the syntax and the fact that the `EndLoc` variable is being returned, it is likely that the next statement will be the end of the function or method that this code is a part of." LLVM,RISCV,232,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the `getFeatureBits` function is not specified. However, based on the name of the function and the parameter it takes, it is likely that the function returns a bitmask representing the feature bits for the given feature." LLVM,RISCV,233,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet without knowing the context and the implementation of the `getSTI` and `getFeatureBits` methods. However, based on the syntax and the names of the methods, it appears that the code is trying to retrieve a feature bit from an object that has a `getSTI` method that returns an object with a `getFeatureBits` method. Therefore, the next statement could be any of the following: * `return getSTI().getFeatureBits(Feature);` * `return getSTI().getFeature" LLVM,RISCV,234,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `Kind` and `Imm` variables, as well as the context in which this code is being executed. However, based on the information provided, it is likely that the next statement will be a return statement, as the code appears to be checking the value of `Kind` and `Imm` and returning a value based on that check. The `` placeholder suggests that the code is expecting a string literal as input, and the `Imm` variable is likely" LLVM,RISCV,235,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the `getLoc()` method is dependent on the implementation of the `SMLoc` class and the specific instance of the class being used. However, based on the name of the method and the fact that it is a member function of the `SMLoc` class, it is likely that the method returns the location of the `SMLoc` object in some form, such as a file path or a line number. Without more information about the implementation of the `SMLoc` class" LLVM,RISCV,236,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the `getLoc()` method is dependent on the implementation of the `SMLoc` class and the specific instance of the class being used. However, based on the name of the method and the fact that it is a member function of the `SMLoc` class, it is likely that the method returns the location of the `SMLoc` object in some form, such as a file path or a line number. Without more information about the implementation of the `SMLoc` class" LLVM,RISCV,237,"The next statement after the code snippet you provided is: `Kind = KindTy::Register;` This statement assigns the value `KindTy::Register` to the variable `Kind`." LLVM,RISCV,238,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be an assignment statement, where the value of the `FRM` variable is set to the result of the `getSymbol()` method called on the `SE` object, and then the `getName()` method is called on the result of `getSymbol()`. So, the next statement of this code snippet is likely to be: ``` FRM = SE.getSymbol().getName(); ```" LLVM,RISCV,239,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be an assignment statement, where the value of the `FRM` variable is set to the result of the `getSymbol()` method called on the `SE` object, and then the `getName()` method is called on the result of `getSymbol()`. So, the next statement of this code snippet is likely to be: ``` FRM = SE.getSymbol().getName(); ```" LLVM,RISCV,240,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be the return statement, which will return the start location of the current node. The `getStartLoc()` method is a member function of the `SMLoc` class, which is a class that represents a location in the source code. The `getStartLoc()` method returns the start location of the current node, which is the location where the node begins in the source code. The code snippet you provided is likely to be part of a larger program that is parsing the source code of a programming language. The `getStartLoc()` method is being called" LLVM,RISCV,241,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be the return statement, which returns the value of the `StartLoc` variable." LLVM,RISCV,242,"The next statement of this code snippet is: return SysReg;" LLVM,RISCV,243,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return StringRef(SysReg.Data, SysReg.Length);` This statement returns a `StringRef` object that represents the system register name. The `StringRef` constructor takes two arguments: the first is a pointer to the first character of the string, and the second is the length of the string. In this case, the first argument is `SysReg.Data`, which is a pointer to the first character of the system register name, and the second argument is `SysReg.Length`, which is the length of the system" LLVM,RISCV,244,The next statement after the `assert` statement is `return Tok;`. LLVM,RISCV,245,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the program depends on the specific implementation of the `getVType` function and the data stored in the `this` object. However, based on the name of the function and the fact that it is a member function of a class, it is likely that the function returns a value that represents the type of the object. The return type of the function is `unsigned`, which suggests that the function returns an unsigned integer value. Without more information about the specific implementation of the function and the data stored in" LLVM,RISCV,246,"The next statement of this code snippet is: return Kind;" LLVM,RISCV,247,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `if (IsConstantImm) {` This is because the `evaluateConstantImm` function returns a boolean value indicating whether the immediate value is a constant expression. If the immediate value is a constant expression, the `IsConstantImm` variable will be set to `true`, and the code inside the `if` block will be executed." LLVM,RISCV,248,"The next statement after the `if` statement is: `IsValid = AsmParser :: classifySymbolRef ( getImm ( ) , VK ) ;` This statement assigns the result of the `classifySymbolRef` method to the `IsValid` variable, using the `ISA_LIT` macro to specify the instruction set architecture (ISA) for the symbol reference. The `getImm` method is called to retrieve the immediate value of the symbol reference, and the `VK` parameter is passed to the `classify" LLVM,RISCV,249,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return false;` Explanation: The code snippet is a method named `isBareSymbol` that takes no arguments and returns a `bool`. The method checks if the current symbol is a bare symbol, which means it is not a constant expression. The method first checks if the current symbol is an immediate value by calling the `isImm` method. If the symbol is not an immediate value, the method returns `false`. If the symbol is an immediate value, the method evaluates the constant expression using the `evalu" LLVM,RISCV,250,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the code depends on the specific values of the variables and the implementation of the functions being called. However, based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the next statement will be a comparison of the `VK` variable to the `MCExpr::VK_None` constant. If the comparison evaluates to true, the `isBareSymbol` function will return `true`, otherwise it will return `false`." LLVM,RISCV,251,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be a switch statement that checks the value of `VK` and performs different actions based on its value. The possible values of `VK` are: * `VK_None`: This is the default value, and it indicates that there is no variant kind. * `VK_Variant`: This value indicates that the expression is a variant expression. * `VK_Variant_None`: This value indicates that the expression is a variant expression, but it does not have a specific variant kind. The switch statement will likely look" LLVM,RISCV,252,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return false;` This is because the `if` statement is checking if the expression is not an immediate (i.e., `!isImm()`) or if the immediate value cannot be evaluated as a constant (i.e., `evaluateConstantImm()` returns `false`). If either of these conditions is true, the function returns `false`." LLVM,RISCV,253,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return IsConstantImm && ( Imm != ) && ( isUInt < > ( Imm ) || ( Imm >= && Imm <= ) ) && VK == MCExpr :: VK__None ;` This statement is a return statement that returns a boolean value indicating whether the given expression is a constant immediate value that is not equal to a" LLVM,RISCV,254,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `isImm` function and the `MCExpr` class. However, based on the information provided, it is likely that the next statement will be: `Imm = MCExpr :: VK__None ;` This statement is assigning the value of the `VK__None` variant of the `MCExpr` class to the `Imm` variable." LLVM,RISCV,255,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `isCSRSystemRegister` function. However, based on the name of the function and the fact that it is a member function of a class, it is likely that the function returns a boolean value indicating whether the current system register is a CSR (Control and Status Register) register." LLVM,RISCV,256,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `Prev = c;` This statement assigns the current character `c` to the variable `Prev`, which is used to keep track of the previous character in the string." LLVM,RISCV,257,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `if (Prev == '\0' || Prev == 'i' || Prev == 'o' || Prev == 'r' || Prev == 'w') {` This is because the code is checking if the previous character is one of the characters 'i', 'o', 'r', 'w', or '\0', and if it is not, it returns false." LLVM,RISCV,258,"The next statement after the `if` statement is: `StringRef Str = SVal->getSymbol()->getName();` This statement assigns the result of the `getName()` method of the `MCSymbol` object returned by `SVal->getSymbol()` to the `Str` variable." LLVM,RISCV,259,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `getImm` function and the `dyn_cast` template. However, based on the names of the functions and variables, it is likely that the next statement will be a check to see if the `SVal` pointer is null, as it is being assigned the result of a `dyn_cast` operation. Here is a possible next statement: ``` if (SVal == nullptr) { // handle the case where the symbol is not a symbol" LLVM,RISCV,260,"The next statement of this code snippet is: return isGPR( ) && IsGPRAsFPR;" LLVM,RISCV,261,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the `IsGPRAsFPR` function is not specified. However, based on the name of the function and the context in which it is used, it is likely that it returns a boolean value indicating whether the current GPR is also an FPR. Therefore, the next statement of this code snippet is likely to be: ``` if (isGPRAsFPR()) { // do something } ```" LLVM,RISCV,262,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be a conditional statement, such as an if-else statement or a switch statement, that checks the value of the `isGPR` and `IsGPRAsFPR` variables and performs a specific action based on their values. For example, the next statement could be: ``` if (isGPR && IsGPRAsFPR) { // Do something if both variables are true } else { // Do something else if either variable is false } ``` Alternatively, the next statement could be a switch" LLVM,RISCV,263,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be: return isGPR( ) && IsGPRAsFPR && IsRV64; This statement is a boolean expression that evaluates to true if the current instruction is a GPR (General Purpose Register) instruction, and the GPR is also an FPR (Floating Point Register) and the architecture is RV64 (64-bit)." LLVM,RISCV,264,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the function is dependent on the specific implementation of the `isGPRPF64AsFPR` function. However, based on the name of the function and the fact that it is declared as a `const` function, it is likely that the next statement will be a comparison or a check of some kind, possibly involving the `GPRPF64` and `FPR` values." LLVM,RISCV,265,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return isGPR() && IsGPRAsFPR && !IsRV64 && !((Reg.RegNum - ) & );` This statement is a boolean expression that checks if the current register is a general-purpose register (GPR), if it is also a floating-point register (FPR), if the architecture is not RV64, and if the register number is not a specific value. The specific values are represented by the `` and `<" LLVM,RISCV,266,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be: `Imm = readInt64(MCExpr.getExpr());` This is because the code checks if the expression is an immediate value using the `isImm()` function, and if it is not, it returns `false`. If the expression is an immediate value, it reads the value using the `readInt64()` function and assigns it to the `Imm` variable." LLVM,RISCV,267,"Based on the code snippet provided, it is difficult to predict the next statement with certainty. However, based on the context and the information provided, it is possible to make some educated guesses. Firstly, the `evaluateConstantImm` function is called with the `getImm` function as an argument, which suggests that the function is trying to evaluate a constant immediate value. The `Imm` variable is also passed as an argument, which could be a constant immediate value. Next, the `VK` variable is checked to see if it is equal to the `MCExpr" LLVM,RISCV,268,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `Imm = MCExpr :: getImm ( VK ) ;` This statement assigns the immediate value of the machine code expression to the `Imm` variable, using the `getImm()` method of the `MCExpr` class. The `VK` variable is used to specify the type of immediate value to retrieve." LLVM,RISCV,269,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `bool isMem ( ) const override { return false ; }` This is a method declaration that overrides the `isMem` method from the base class. The method returns a `bool` value indicating whether the object is a memory object or not. The `const` keyword is used to indicate that the method does not modify the object's state. The `override` keyword is used to indicate that the method is overriding a method with the same name and signature from the base class." LLVM,RISCV,270,The next statement after `return false;` would be the end of the function or method. LLVM,RISCV,271,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return VK == MCExpr :: VK__None;` Explanation: The code snippet is checking if the immediate value is a pseudo-jump symbol by calling the `isImm` and `evaluateConstantImm` functions. If the immediate value is not an immediate or if the immediate value cannot be evaluated as a constant, the function returns `false`. Otherwise, it returns `true` if the `VK` variable is equal to `` token is likely to be a string literal that represents the name of the feature that is being checked. Therefore, the next statement of this code snippet is likely to be: ``` return getSTI().hasFeature(""""); ``` This statement will return a boolean value indicating whether the feature represented by the string literal `` is present in" LLVM,RISCV,275,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be a call to the `getSTI()` method, which is expected to return an object that has a `hasFeature()` method. The `` token is likely to be a string literal that represents the name of the feature that is being checked. Therefore, the next statement of this code snippet is likely to be: ``` return getSTI().hasFeature(""""); ``` This statement will return a boolean value indicating whether the feature represented by the string literal `` is present in" LLVM,RISCV,276,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return IsConstantImm && ( Imm != ) && isShiftedInt < , > ( Imm ) && VK == MCExpr :: VK__None;` This statement is a return statement that returns a boolean value indicating whether the expression is a constant immediate value and meets certain conditions. The conditions are: * `IsConstantImm`: The expression is a constant" LLVM,RISCV,277,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `if (IsConstantImm) {` This is because the `evaluateConstantImm` function returns a boolean value indicating whether the immediate value is a constant expression or not. If the immediate value is a constant expression, the `IsConstantImm` variable will be set to `true`, and the `if` statement will be executed. If the immediate value is not a constant expression, the `IsConstantImm` variable will be set to `false`, and the `if` statement will not be executed." LLVM,RISCV,278,"The next statement after the code snippet you provided is: `return IsConstantImm;`" LLVM,RISCV,279,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be the implementation of the `isBareSimmNLsb0` function, which is called by the `isSImm12Lsb0` function. The `isBareSimmNLsb0` function is likely to be a function that checks whether a given value is a bare signed immediate value with the least significant bit set to 0. The function is likely to take a single argument, which is the value to be checked, and return a boolean value indicating whether the value is a bare signed immediate value with the least significant bit set to" LLVM,RISCV,280,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the code depends on the specific values of the variables and the implementation of the `isBareSimmNLsb0` function. However, based on the syntax and the name of the function, it is likely that the function returns a boolean value indicating whether the given value is a bare SIMm NLsb0 value. The `` placeholder in the code snippet suggests that the function takes a numerical literal as an argument. Without more information about the specific implementation of the `" LLVM,RISCV,281,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the `evaluateConstantImm` function is not specified. However, based on the name of the function and the arguments it takes, it is likely that it will evaluate the constant immediate value and return a boolean indicating whether the value is constant. Therefore, the next statement of this code snippet is likely to be the return statement, which will return the result of the `evaluateConstantImm` function." LLVM,RISCV,282,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return (getImm() & 0x1F) == 0;`" LLVM,RISCV,283,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the `evaluateConstantImm` function is not specified. However, based on the name of the function and the arguments it takes, it is likely that it will evaluate the constant immediate value and return a boolean indicating whether the value is constant. Therefore, the next statement of this code snippet is likely to be the return statement, which will return the result of the `evaluateConstantImm` function." LLVM,RISCV,284,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return (getImm() & 0x1F) == 0x1F;` This statement is checking if the immediate value is a valid 5-bit signed integer, which is represented by the range -16 to 15. The `getImm()` function returns the immediate value, and the `& 0x1F` operation masks off the lower 5 bits. The comparison `== 0x1F` checks if the result is equal to 0x1F, which indicates that the immediate value is" LLVM,RISCV,285,"The next statement of the code snippet is: `VK = MCExpr::VK__None;` This statement assigns the value `MCExpr::VK__None` to the variable `VK`. The `MCExpr::VK__None` is a constant value that represents the absence of a value in the `MCExpr` class." LLVM,RISCV,286,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the `evaluateConstantImm` function is not specified. However, based on the name of the function and the arguments it takes, it is likely that it will evaluate the constant immediate value and return a boolean indicating whether the value is constant. Therefore, the next statement of this code snippet is likely to be the return statement, which will return the result of the `evaluateConstantImm` function." LLVM,RISCV,287,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the code depends on the specific values of the variables and the implementation of the `isBareSimmNLsb0` function. However, based on the syntax and the name of the function, it is likely that the function returns a boolean value indicating whether the given value is a bare SIMm NLsb0 value. The `` placeholder in the code snippet suggests that the function takes a numerical literal as an argument. Without more information about the specific implementation of the `" LLVM,RISCV,288,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the `isSystemRegister` function depends on the value of the `Kind` member variable, which is not specified in the code snippet. However, based on the name of the function and the fact that it is a member function of a class, it is likely that the function is used to determine whether a particular register is a system register or not. The function may return `true` if the register is a system register and `false` otherwise. Without more information about the context in which the code" LLVM,RISCV,289,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the `isSystemRegister` function is dependent on the specific implementation of the `SystemRegister` class and the input parameters passed to the function. However, based on the name of the function and the fact that it is a member function of the `SystemRegister` class, it is likely that the function will return a boolean value indicating whether the current system register is a system register or not. Therefore, the next statement of this code snippet could be any of the following: * `return true" LLVM,RISCV,290,"The next statement after the given code snippet is likely to be the implementation of the `isToken()` method, which is a member function of the `Token` class. Here is an example of what the `isToken()` method might look like: ``` bool Token::isToken() const { return true; } ``` This method simply returns `true` to indicate that the current token is a token. It's worth noting that the `Kind` variable is not explicitly declared in the code snippet you provided, so it's possible that it's a member variable" LLVM,RISCV,291,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the program depends on the input and the specific implementation of the `Kind` and `Token` classes. However, based on the syntax and the context, it appears that the code is checking the type of the `Kind` object and returning a `Token` object if the type matches. Here is a possible next statement: ``` return new Token(Kind.getKind(), Kind.getToken()); ``` This statement creates a new `Token` object with the kind and token values obtained from the `" LLVM,RISCV,292,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return false;` This is because the `if` statement is checking if the expression is not an immediate (i.e., `!isImm()`) or if the immediate value cannot be evaluated as a constant (i.e., `evaluateConstantImm()` returns `false`). If either of these conditions is true, the function returns `false`." LLVM,RISCV,293,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be: `if (IsConstantImm) { ... }` This is because the `evaluateConstantImm` function is called with the `getImm` function as an argument, and the return value of `evaluateConstantImm` is assigned to the `IsConstantImm` variable. If the `evaluateConstantImm` function returns a non-zero value, then the `IsConstantImm` variable will be set to `true`, and the code inside the `if` statement will be" LLVM,RISCV,294,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the `evaluateConstantImm` function is not specified. However, based on the name of the function and the arguments it takes, it is likely that it will evaluate the constant immediate value and return a boolean indicating whether the value is constant. Therefore, the next statement of this code snippet is likely to be the return statement, which will return the result of the `evaluateConstantImm` function." LLVM,RISCV,295,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the `evaluateConstantImm` function is not specified. However, based on the name of the function and the arguments it takes, it is likely that it will evaluate the constant immediate value and return a boolean indicating whether the value is constant. Therefore, the next statement of this code snippet is likely to be the return statement, which will return the result of the `evaluateConstantImm` function." LLVM,RISCV,296,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return isUInt < > ( Imm ) && ( VK == MCExpr :: VK__None || VK == MCExpr :: VK__PCREL_HI || VK == MCExpr :: VK__GOT_HI || VK == MCExpr" LLVM,RISCV,297,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return isUInt < > ( Imm ) && ( VK == MCExpr :: VK__None || VK == MCExpr :: VK__PCREL_HI || VK == MCExpr :: VK__GOT_HI || VK == MCExpr" LLVM,RISCV,298,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `IsValid = AsmParser :: classifySymbolRef ( getImm ( ) , VK ) ;` This statement is executed if the previous condition `!IsConstantImm` is true, which means that the immediate value is not a constant. In this case, the function `classifySymbolRef` is called to determine the type of the symbol reference. The return value of this function is stored in the variable `IsValid`." LLVM,RISCV,299,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `if (IsConstantImm) {`" LLVM,RISCV,300,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the code depends on the specific values of the variables and the implementation of the functions being called. However, based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the code is initializing a variable `Imm` of type `int64_t` and a variable `VK` of type `MCExpr::VariantKind`. The value of `VK` is being set to `MCExpr::VK_None`, which suggests that the code is initializing a variant kind to a default value." LLVM,RISCV,301,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return false;` This is because the `if` statement checks if `isImm()` returns `false`, and if it does, the function returns `false`." LLVM,RISCV,302,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `if (IsConstantImm) {`" LLVM,RISCV,303,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet without knowing the context and the purpose of the code. However, based on the syntax and the variables used, it appears to be a part of a function that is checking if a given value is a constant immediate value and if it is shifted by a certain amount. The function is also checking if the value is of a specific type () and if it has a specific value (MCExpr :: VK__None). Without more information," LLVM,RISCV,304,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `Imm = getImm ( ) ;`" LLVM,RISCV,305,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return IsConstantImm && isShiftedUInt < , > ( Imm ) && VK == MCExpr :: VK__None;` This statement is the return statement of the `isUImm8Lsb00` function. It returns a boolean value indicating whether the immediate value is a valid unsigned integer with the specified number of bits and the least significant bit set to 0. The function uses the" LLVM,RISCV,306,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be a switch statement that checks the value of `VK` and performs different actions based on its value. The possible values of `VK` are: * `VK_None`: This is the default value, and it indicates that there is no variant kind. * `VK_Variant`: This value indicates that the expression is a variant expression. * `VK_Variant_None`: This value indicates that the expression is a variant expression, but it does not have a specific variant kind. The switch statement will likely look" LLVM,RISCV,307,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet without knowing the context and the purpose of the code. However, based on the syntax and the variables used, it appears to be a part of a function that is checking if a given value is a constant immediate value and if it is shifted by a certain amount. The function is also checking if the value is of a specific type () and if it has a specific value (MCExpr :: VK__None). Without more information," LLVM,RISCV,308,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet without knowing the context and the purpose of the code. However, based on the syntax and the variables used, it appears to be a part of a function that is checking if a given value is a constant immediate value and if it is shifted by a certain amount. The function is also checking if the value is of a specific type () and if it has a specific value (MCExpr :: VK__None). Without more information," LLVM,RISCV,309,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the `isImm` function and the value of the `Imm` variable are not specified. However, based on the code snippet, it appears that the `isImm` function is checking whether the current object is an immediate value, and if it is not, the function returns `false`. If the current object is an immediate value, the function returns an integer value. Therefore, the next statement of this code snippet could be either: * `return false;` if the current object is" LLVM,RISCV,310,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return (isRV64( ) && isUInt(Imm)) || isUInt(Imm);` This statement is the last statement in the code snippet, and it returns a boolean value indicating whether the current instruction is a valid RISC-V instruction. The return value is determined by the values of the `isRV64()` and `isUInt()` functions, which are called with the `Imm` variable as an argument. If" LLVM,RISCV,311,"The next statement after the given code snippet is: `return false;` Explanation: The given code snippet is a part of a function that checks if a constant immediate value is valid for a specific instruction set architecture (ISA). The function first checks if the immediate value is not immediate (i.e., `!isImm()`) and returns `false` if it is not. Then, it checks if the constant immediate value can be evaluated to a valid immediate value for the ISA using the `evaluateConstantImm()` function. If the evaluation fails or the resulting immediate" LLVM,RISCV,312,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return (isRV64( ) && isUInt(Imm)) || isUInt(Imm);` This statement is the last statement in the code snippet, and it returns a boolean value indicating whether the current instruction is a valid RISC-V instruction. The return value is determined by the values of the `isRV64()` and `isUInt()` functions, which are called with the `Imm` variable as an argument. If" LLVM,RISCV,313,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be a check for the value of `Imm` and `VK`. The code is checking if `Imm` is not equal to `VK__None`, which suggests that the code is trying to determine if the immediate value is valid or not. Here is a possible next statement: ``` if (Imm != VK__None) { // handle valid immediate value } else { // handle invalid immediate value } ``` It'" LLVM,RISCV,314,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return (isRV64() && isUInt(Imm)) || isUInt(Imm);` This statement is the last line of the code snippet, and it returns a boolean value indicating whether the expression is a valid immediate value for the RISC-V instruction set architecture (ISA). The expression is considered valid if it is either a 32-bit unsigned integer or a 64-bit unsigned integer, depending on the value of the `isRV64" LLVM,RISCV,315,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return (isRV64() && isUInt(Imm)) || isUInt(Imm);` This statement is the last line of the code snippet, and it returns a boolean value indicating whether the expression is a valid immediate value for the RISC-V instruction set architecture (ISA). The expression is considered valid if it is either a 32-bit unsigned integer or a 64-bit unsigned integer, depending on the value of the `isRV64" LLVM,RISCV,316,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `KindTy` class and the `Reg` class, as well as the value of the `RegNum` field. However, based on the syntax and the context of the code, it is likely that the next statement will be a comparison of the `RegNum` field with a string literal, such as: ``` return Kind == KindTy :: Register && Reg . RegNum == ""r0"" ; ``` This statement would check if the `Kind` field of the" LLVM,RISCV,317,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the function is dependent on the specific implementation of the `isV0Reg` function. However, based on the name of the function, it is likely that the next statement will check if the current register is the V0 register." LLVM,RISCV,318,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the program depends on the specific implementation of the `isVTypeI10` function and the data it is called with. However, based on the name of the function and the fact that it is a member function of a class, it is likely that the function is used to determine whether a given object is of a specific type or not. The function may be returning a boolean value indicating whether the object is of type `I10` or not. Without more information about the specific implementation of" LLVM,RISCV,319,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific values of the variables and the implementation of the `isVTypeImm` function. However, based on the information provided, it is likely that the next statement will be a return statement, as the `isVTypeImm` function is being called with the value of `NUM_LIT` as an argument. The `isVTypeImm` function is likely to return a boolean value indicating whether the value of `NUM_LIT` is a valid immediate value for the variable `" LLVM,RISCV,320,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the `evaluateConstantImm` function is not specified. However, based on the name of the function and the arguments it takes, it is likely that it will evaluate the constant immediate value and return a boolean indicating whether the value is constant. Therefore, the next statement of this code snippet is likely to be the return statement, which will return the result of the `evaluateConstantImm` function." LLVM,RISCV,321,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return false;` This is because the `if` statement checks if `isImm()` returns `false`, and if it does, the function returns `false`." LLVM,RISCV,322,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `RegisterMCAsmParser` function and the `getThe32Target` function. However, based on the syntax and the context of the code, it is likely that the next statement will be a call to the `RegisterMCAsmParser` function, passing in the result of the `getThe32Target` function as an argument. Here is an example of what the next statement might look like:" LLVM,RISCV,323,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `if ( RegNo == ) RegNo = MatchRegisterAltName ( Name ) ;` This is because the previous statement, `static_assert ( < , ) ;`, is a compile-time assertion that is always true, so the control flow will continue to the next statement. The next statement is an `if` statement that checks if `RegNo` is equal to a specific string literal, and if so, it assigns the" LLVM,RISCV,324,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `const MCExpr * V = Sym -> getVariableValue ( false ) ;`" LLVM,RISCV,325,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be: `return MatchOperand_NoMatch;` This is because the code checks the kind of the current token using `getLexer().getKind()` and `getLexer().peekTok().getKind()`, and if it is not an identifier or an end-of-statement, it returns `MatchOperand_NoMatch`. If the current token is an identifier, it tries to parse the identifier using `getParser().parseIdentifier(Identifier)`, and if that fails, it returns `MatchOperand_ParseFail`. If" LLVM,RISCV,326,"Based on the code snippet provided, it appears to be a part of a function that is attempting to match an operand in an assembly language. The function is checking if the operand is a system register and if it has the required features. If the operand is not a system register or does not have the required features, an error message is generated. The next statement of the code snippet is: `Twine Msg = ;` This line is declaring a variable `Msg` of type `Twine` and initializing it with a" LLVM,RISCV,327,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be: `Operands.push_back(Operand::createSysReg(SysReg->Name, S, SysReg->Encoding, isRV64()));` This is because the code is checking if the `SysReg` variable is not null, and if it is not null, it is creating a new `Operand` object using the `createSysReg` method and pushing it to the `Operands` vector. The `createSysReg` method takes four arguments" LLVM,RISCV,328,"Based on the code snippet you provided, it appears that the `DirectiveID` variable is an object that has a `getString()` method that returns a `StringRef` object. The `StringRef` object has a `==` operator that compares the string value of the `StringRef` object with the string literal passed as an argument. Therefore, the next statement of the code snippet will be: `if (IDVal == )` This statement checks whether the `IDVal` variable is equal to the string literal ``. If" LLVM,RISCV,329,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be: `getTargetStreamer()->emitAttribute(Tag, IntegerValue);` This is because the code checks if `IsIntegerValue` is true, and if it is, it emits an attribute with the tag and integer value. If `IsIntegerValue` is false, it emits a text attribute with the tag and string value." LLVM,RISCV,330,"The next statement after the `if` statement is: `unsigned Opcode;` This statement declares a variable `Opcode` of type `unsigned`." LLVM,RISCV,331,"Based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the next statement will be: `getTargetStreamer().emitDirectiveOptionPush();` This is because the previous `if` statement checks if the `Option` variable is equal to ``, and if it is, it calls the `getTargetStreamer().emitDirectiveOptionPush()` method. The `getTargetStreamer()` method is called on the `Parser` object, which is an instance of the `AsmParser` class. The `emitDirectiveOptionPush()` method is called on the `TargetStreamer" LLVM,RISCV,332,"The next statement in this code snippet is: `return MatchOperand_NoMatch;`" LLVM,RISCV,333,The next statement after the `if` block is `break;`. The `break` statement is used to exit the `switch` statement and continue execution at the next statement outside the `switch` block. LLVM,RISCV,334,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the input and the behavior of the `parseExpression` method. However, based on the code snippet you provided, it appears that the next statement will be: `return parseOperandWithModifier(Operands);` This is because the `if` statement that precedes it checks if the `parseExpression` method returns `MatchOperand_ParseFail`, and if it does, it returns `MatchOperand_ParseFail`. However, if the `parseExpression` method returns a value other than `" LLVM,RISCV,335,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `getParser().Lex()` This statement is called after the `if` statement that checks if the lexer is not at the end of the statement. If the lexer is not at the end of the statement, the `Lex()` method is called to advance the lexer to the next token." LLVM,RISCV,336,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `Operands.push_back(Operand::createReg(RegNo, S, E, isRV64()));` This statement creates a new `Operand` object using the `createReg` method of the `Operand` class, passing in the `RegNo`, `S`, `E`, and `isRV64()` values as arguments. The resulting `Operand` object is then pushed onto the `Operands` vector." LLVM,RISCV,337,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `Operands.push_back(Operand::createToken(, getLoc(), isRV64()));` This statement creates a new `Operand` object using the `createToken` method of the `Operand` class, and adds it to the `Operands` vector. The `createToken` method takes three arguments: the first is a string literal representing the token, the second is the location of the token, and the third is a boolean indicating whether the token is a" LLVM,RISCV,338,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `Operands.push_back(Operand::createToken(, getLoc(), isRV64()));`" LLVM,RISCV,339,"The next statement after the given code snippet is: `return false;` The code snippet is inside a function that is checking if the operands are valid. If the operands are valid, the function returns `false`. If the operands are not valid, the function continues to check if the immediate operand is valid. If the immediate operand is valid, the function checks if the next token is a left parenthesis. If it is, the function calls `parseMemOpBaseReg` and returns the result. If the immediate operand is not valid, the function returns `false`." LLVM,RISCV,340,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `MatchOperand` function and the input it is being called with. However, based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the next statement will likely be a call to the `Parse` function, possibly with the `SubExpr` variable as an argument." LLVM,RISCV,341,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific values of the variables and the behavior of the functions being called. However, based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the next statement will be: `Operands.push_back(Operand::createImm(Res, S, E, isRV64()));` This statement will add a new operand to the `Operands` vector, which is a vector of `Operand` objects. The new operand will be created using" LLVM,RISCV,342,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `Operands.push_back(Operand::createToken(, getLoc(), isRV64()));`" LLVM,RISCV,343,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `getParser()->Lex();`" LLVM,RISCV,344,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be: `if (getLexer().isNot(AsmToken::LParen)) {` This is because the previous statement, `if (getLexer().isNot(AsmToken::LParen)) {`, has already been executed, and the code has not yet reached the end of the `if` block. Therefore, the next statement is likely to be the beginning of the next `if` block, which is the `if (getLexer().isNot(AsmToken::LParen))" LLVM,RISCV,345,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of the code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `copySTI` function and the `ParserOptionsStack` class. However, based on the code provided, it is likely that the next statement will be: ``` ParserOptions = ParserOptionsStack.pop_back_val(); ``` This statement pops the last element from the `ParserOptionsStack` and assigns it to the `ParserOptions` variable." LLVM,RISCV,346,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `FeatureBitStack.pop_back_val()`" LLVM,RISCV,347,"Based on the code snippet provided, it appears to be a switch statement that is handling different types of data. The next statement after the `KindTy :: Immediate` case would be the `KindTy :: Register` case." LLVM,RISCV,348,"Based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the `Kind` variable is being used to determine which case to execute. The `Kind` variable is being compared to the `KindTy` enumeration, which has two possible values: `Immediate` and `Register`. If `Kind` is equal to `KindTy::Immediate`, then the code will execute the statement `OS << *getImm();`. If `Kind` is equal to `KindTy::Register`, then the code will execute the statement `OS << << RegName(getReg()) << ) && !getSTI().getFeatureBits()[]) { errs() << ; } else if (ABIName.endswith() && !getSTI().getFeatureBits()[]) { errs() << ; } AsmParser :: ParseRegister ( unsigned & RegNo ," LLVM,RISCV,354,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `getParser().Lex();` This statement calls the `Lex()` method of the `getParser()` object, which is likely to be a method that retrieves the next token from the input stream. The return value of this method is not used in this code snippet, so it is likely that the purpose of this statement is to simply advance the parser to the next token." LLVM,RISCV,355,"The next statement of this code snippet is: if ( Inst . getOpcode ( ) == || Inst . getOpcode ( ) == ) { This is because the code is checking the opcode of the instruction to see if it is equal to one of the two specified strings. If it is, then the code will execute the block of code inside the if statement." LLVM,RISCV,356,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `if ( IsRegVR && ( Kind == MCK_VRM2 || Kind == MCK_VRM4 || Kind == MCK_VRM8 ) ) {`" LLVM,RISCV,357,"This code snippet is part of a function named `emitLoadImm` that is defined within a class named `AsmParser`. The function takes three arguments: `DestReg`, `Value`, and `Out`. The function first creates a sequence of instructions called `Seq` using the `Seq` constructor and the `Value` and `isRV64` functions. The function then iterates over the instructions in the `Seq` sequence using a `for` loop. For each instruction in the sequence, the function checks the instruction's opcode (stored in the `Opc`" LLVM,RISCV,358,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the code depends on the specific values of the variables and the implementation of the functions called. However, based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the code is iterating over a sequence of objects and checking the value of a field called ""Opc"" for each object. If the value of ""Opc"" is equal to a specific string literal, then some action is taken. Without more information, it is not possible to determine what the action is or what the values of the variables are." LLVM,RISCV,359,"The next statement of this code snippet is: MCOperand Symbol = Inst.getOperand(SymbolOpIdx);" LLVM,RISCV,360,"Based on the code snippet provided, it is difficult to predict the next statement with certainty. However, based on the context and the patterns in the code, it is likely that the next statement will be another `emitToStreamer` call with a similar structure to the previous ones. The `emitToStreamer` function appears to be a function that takes a streamer and a builder as arguments, and it is called multiple times in the code snippet. The builder is constructed using the `MCInstBuilder` class, and it is used to add operands and registers to the builder. The `addOperand" LLVM,RISCV,361,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `emitToStreamer(Out, MCInstBuilder(Opcode).addOperand(Inst.getOperand()).addOperand(Inst.getOperand()).addOperand(Inst.getOperand()).addOperand(Inst.getOperand()));` This statement is an invocation of the `emitToStreamer` function, which takes two arguments: `Out`, which is a streamer object" LLVM,RISCV,362,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `Operands.push_back(ISA_LITOperand::createSysReg(SysReg->Name, S, Imm, isRV64()));` This statement adds a new operand to the `Operands` vector, which is a vector of `ISA_LITOperand` objects. The `createSysReg` method is called to create a new `ISA_LITOperand` object, which is then added to the `Operands` vector. The `createSysReg`" LLVM,RISCV,363,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return parseDirectiveOption();`" LLVM,RISCV,364,The next statement after the `else if` block will be the `return true` statement. LLVM,RISCV,365,"This code snippet is part of a function that appears to be checking for errors in a machine code instruction. The function takes an `Inst` object as an argument, which represents a machine code instruction, and performs various checks on the instruction. The code snippet you provided is part of a larger `if` statement that checks if the instruction has a specific flag set, and if the destination register of the instruction is a specific register. If the flag is set and the destination register is the one being checked, the function returns an error message. The next statement in the code snippet you provided is: ``` unsigned" LLVM,RISCV,366,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `Op.Reg.RegNum = convertFPR64ToFPR16(Reg);`" LLVM,RISCV,367,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be: `Inst.addOperand(MCOperand::createExpr(Expr));` This is because the `addExpr` function is adding an expression operand to the `Inst` object, which is an instance of the `MCInst` class. The `MCOperand::createExpr` function creates an `MCOperand` object from an `MCExpr` object, which is the type of the `Expr` parameter. It's worth noting that the code snippet you provided is not complete, so it" LLVM,RISCV,368,"The code snippet is checking if the `Expr` object is a constant expression. If it is, it sets the `IsConstant` flag to `true` and evaluates the constant expression to an integer value. If the `Expr` object is not a constant expression, it sets the `IsConstant` flag to `false`. Therefore, the next statement of this code snippet would be: ``` if (IsConstant) { // do something with the constant expression } else { // do something else } ```" LLVM,RISCV,369,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be the execution of the `addOperand` method on the `Inst` object, passing in the `Imm` variable as an argument. The `addOperand` method is used to add an operand to the instruction being constructed, and the `Imm` variable is the immediate value that is being added as an operand. The `Imm` variable is calculated based on the symbolic expression `SE` and the `getImm` method is used to retrieve the immediate value from the symbolic expression. Therefore, the next" LLVM,RISCV,370,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific inputs and the behavior of the code. However, based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the next statement after the `switch` block will be the `break` statement, which will exit the `switch` block and continue execution at the next statement outside the block. The `switch` block is checking the value of the `c` variable, and based on its value, it is setting the `Imm` variable to a specific value. The `break` statement is used to exit the `" LLVM,RISCV,371,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `emitToStreamer(Out, MCInstBuilder().addReg(DestReg).addReg(DestReg).addImm(ShiftAmount));` This statement is part of the `if (Lo12)` block, which is executed if the `Lo12` variable is non-zero. The statement emits an instruction to the output stream `Out`, using the `MCInstBuilder` class to construct the instruction. The instruction is an add immediate operation, with the destination register being the same as the source" LLVM,RISCV,372,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `int64_t Lo12 = SignExtend64 < > ( Value ) ;` This statement assigns the value of `Value` to `Lo12`, sign-extending it to 64 bits. The `SignExtend64` function is used to perform the sign extension. The `` placeholder is used to represent a numerical literal value, which is not specified in the code snippet." LLVM,RISCV,373,"The next statement in the code snippet is: `Ret = true;`" LLVM,RISCV,374,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the `evaluateConstantImm` function depends on the specific implementation of the `MCExpr` class and the values of the `Imm` and `VK` parameters. However, based on the name of the function and the parameters it takes, it is likely that the function is intended to evaluate a constant immediate value and return a boolean indicating whether the evaluation was successful. The function may use the `getImm` method to retrieve the immediate value, and then perform some computation on it to determine" LLVM,RISCV,375,"The next statement after the `if` block is `return IsValid && VK == MCExpr :: VK__None ;`. The `if` block is executed if `IsConstantImm` is false, and it sets `IsValid` to the result of `AsmParser :: classifySymbolRef ( getImm ( ) , VK , Imm )`. The `else` block is executed if `IsConstantImm` is true, and it sets `IsValid` to the result of" LLVM,RISCV,376,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return false;`" LLVM,RISCV,377,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `MCExpr` class and the values of the `Imm` and `VK` variables. However, based on the code snippet you provided, it appears that the `MCExpr` class has a `VariantKind` member variable, and the `isBareSymbol` function is checking whether the `VariantKind` is equal to `ISA_LIT`. If the `VariantKind` is equal to `ISA_LIT`, then the `isB" LLVM,RISCV,378,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the `evaluateConstantImm` function is not specified. However, based on the name of the function and the parameters it takes, it is likely that the function will evaluate the constant immediate value `Imm` and return a boolean value indicating whether the evaluation was successful. Therefore, the next statement of this code snippet is likely to be a conditional statement that checks the return value of the `evaluateConstantImm` function and performs some action based on the result. For example: ```" LLVM,RISCV,379,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return IsConstantImm && ( Imm != ) && isShiftedInt < , > ( Imm ) && VK == MCExpr :: VK__None;` This statement is a return statement that returns a boolean value indicating whether the immediate value is a valid shifted immediate value. The return value is based on the result of the `evaluateConstantImm` function," LLVM,RISCV,380,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return IsValid && (VK == MCExpr::VK_None || VK == MCExpr::VK_LO || VK == MCExpr::VK_PCREL_LO);` Explanation: The code snippet is a method that checks if a given expression is a valid immediate value for the ISA. It first checks if the expression is a constant immediate value, and if so, it evaluates it to see if it is a valid immediate value. If the expression is not a constant immediate value, it checks if" LLVM,RISCV,381,"The next statement after the `if` statement in the code snippet is: `IsValid = isInt < > ( Imm ) ;` This statement is executed if `IsConstantImm` is `true`. It sets the value of `IsValid` to `true` if the immediate value `Imm` is an integer, and `false` otherwise." LLVM,RISCV,382,"This code snippet appears to be part of a function that is checking whether a given expression is a valid immediate value for a specific instruction set architecture (ISA). The function takes a `VariantKind` parameter, which is used to determine the type of immediate value being checked, and an `int64_t` parameter, which is used to store the immediate value. The function first calls the `evaluateConstantImm` function to check if the immediate value is a constant expression. If it is not a constant expression, the function calls the `classifySymbolRef` function to determine the type of" LLVM,RISCV,383,"The next statement after the `if` block is the `else` block. The `else` block is executed if the condition in the `if` statement is false, which means that `IsConstantImm` is true. Inside the `else` block, the code checks if `Imm` is not equal to `` and if `Imm` is an integer with a value greater than or equal to ``. If both conditions are true, `IsValid` is set to true, otherwise it is set to false." LLVM,RISCV,384,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return IsConstantImm && isShiftedUInt < , > ( Imm ) && ( Imm != ) && VK == MCExpr :: VK__None;` This statement is a return statement that returns a boolean value indicating whether the given immediate value `Imm` is a constant immediate value and is shifted by a certain number of bits. The function `isShifted" LLVM,RISCV,385,The next statement after the `if` statement would be the `return false` statement. LLVM,RISCV,386,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet without knowing the context and the specific values of the variables and constants used in the code. However, based on the syntax and the names of the variables, it appears that the code is checking if a given value is a constant immediate value, and if it is, it is checking if the value is less than a certain number (). If the value is less than that number, it is checking if the value is a valid immediate value for a specific instruction set architecture (ISA) (). If all of" LLVM,RISCV,387,"The next statement after the `if` statement in the code snippet you provided is: `IsValid = AsmParser :: classifySymbolRef ( getImm ( ) , VK , Imm ) ;` This statement assigns the result of the `classifySymbolRef` method to the `IsValid` variable, using the `AsmParser` class and the `getImm` method to get the immediate value. The `VK` variable is also passed as an argument to the `classifySymbolRef` method." LLVM,RISCV,388,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `IsValid = AsmParser::classifySymbolRef(getImm(), VK, Imm);` This statement assigns the result of the `classifySymbolRef` method of the `AsmParser` class to the `IsValid` variable. The `classifySymbolRef` method takes three arguments: the immediate value, the virtual key, and the symbol reference. It returns a boolean value indicating whether the symbol reference is valid or not. The `` token is a" LLVM,RISCV,389,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return IsConstantImm && isUInt < > ( Imm ) && VK == MCExpr :: VK__None;` This statement is a return statement that returns a boolean value indicating whether the expression is a constant immediate value and whether the value is within the range of a 32-bit unsigned integer. The `isUInt` function is used to check if the value is within the range of a 32-bit unsigned" LLVM,RISCV,390,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return IsConstantImm && isUInt < > ( Imm ) && VK == MCExpr :: VK__None ;` This statement is a return statement that returns a boolean value indicating whether the expression is a constant immediate value and whether it is a valid unsigned integer literal. The `IsConstantImm` variable is set to `true` if the expression is a constant immediate value, and the `isUInt` function is" LLVM,RISCV,391,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet without knowing the specific values of the variables and constants involved. However, based on the syntax and the context of the code, it appears that the next statement will be a comparison between the `VK` variable and the `MCExpr::VK__None` constant. The `IsConstantImm` variable is being checked to see if it is true, and if it is, the `isUInt` function is being called with the `Imm` variable as an argument. The `isUInt" LLVM,RISCV,392,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the `isImm` function and the value of the `Imm` variable are not specified. However, based on the code snippet, it appears that the `isImm` function is checking whether the current object is an immediate value, and if it is not, the function returns `false`. If the current object is an immediate value, the function returns an integer value. Therefore, the next statement of this code snippet could be either: * `return false;` if the current object is" LLVM,RISCV,393,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the `evaluateConstantImm` function is not specified. However, based on the name of the function and the parameters it takes, it is likely that the function will evaluate the constant immediate value `Imm` and return a boolean value indicating whether the evaluation was successful. Therefore, the next statement of this code snippet is likely to be a conditional statement that checks the return value of the `evaluateConstantImm` function and performs some action based on the result. For example: ```" LLVM,RISCV,394,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the `evaluateConstantImm` function is not specified. However, based on the name of the function and the parameters it takes, it is likely that the function will evaluate the constant immediate value `Imm` and return a boolean value indicating whether the evaluation was successful. Therefore, the next statement of this code snippet is likely to be a conditional statement that checks the return value of the `evaluateConstantImm` function and performs some action based on the result. For example: ```" LLVM,RISCV,395,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the code depends on the specific values of the variables and the implementation of the functions being called. However, based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the next statement will be an assignment to the `Imm` variable, using the value of the `VK` variable as the right-hand side of the assignment. The `VK` variable is of type `ISA_LIT`, which suggests that it is a literal value that represents a specific instruction or operation in the target instruction set architecture (" LLVM,RISCV,396,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return IsConstantImm && isShiftedUInt < , > ( Imm ) && VK == MCExpr :: VK__None;` This statement is a return statement that returns a boolean value indicating whether the expression is a constant immediate value and whether it is a shifted unsigned integer with a specific value. The `IsConstantImm` variable is set to the result of the `evaluateConstantIm" LLVM,RISCV,397,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet without knowing the context and the purpose of the code. However, based on the syntax and the variables used, it appears to be a part of a function that is checking if a given value is a constant immediate value and if it is shifted by a certain amount. The function is also checking if the value is of a specific type () and if it has a specific value (MCExpr :: VK__None). Without more information," LLVM,RISCV,398,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return isUInt < > ( Imm ) ;` This is because the `||` operator has a lower precedence than the `&&` operator, so the expression `isRV64 ( ) && isUInt < > ( Imm )` will be evaluated first. If this expression evaluates to `true`, then the entire expression will be `true`, and the `return` statement will be executed. If this expression evaluates to `false`, then the second part of" LLVM,RISCV,399,"The next statement in the code snippet is: `getTargetStreamer().emitDirectiveOptionNoRVC();`" LLVM,RISCV,400,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `Res = getParser ( ) . ParseExpr ( getLexer ( ) ) ;`" LLVM,RISCV,401,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `if (getLexer().isNot(AsmToken::EndOfStatement)) {` This is because the `while` loop will continue to execute as long as the lexer's current token is a comma, and the `if` statement inside the loop will only be executed if the `parseOperand` function returns `true`. If the `parseOperand` function returns `false`, the loop will continue to the next iteration, and the `if` statement will not be executed. Therefore, the next statement of this" LLVM,RISCV,402,"The next statement after the `if` statement is: `return false;` This is because the `if` statement is checking if `parseRegister(Operands, true) == MatchOperand_Success`, and if it is, it returns `false`. If the condition is not met, the code continues to the next `if` statement, which checks if `parseImmediate(Operands) == MatchOperand_Success`. If this condition is met, it returns `false` as well. If neither of these conditions are met, the code continues to the next statement, which is `return false" LLVM,RISCV,403,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return parseMemOpBaseReg ( Operands ) != MatchOperand_Success ;` This statement is executed if the `parseImmediate` function returns `MatchOperand_Success` and the current token is a left parenthesis. The `parseMemOpBaseReg` function is called with the `Operands` argument, and the result is checked to see if it is not equal to `MatchOperand_Success`. If it is not, the function returns `false`." LLVM,RISCV,404,The next statement after `break;` is `case Token:`. LLVM,RISCV,405,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `emitToStreamer(Out, Inst);` This is because the `processInstruction` function is processing an instruction that is not a load immediate or a load local address instruction, so it will call the `emitToStreamer` function to emit the instruction to the streamer." LLVM,RISCV,406,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the value of the `Kind` variable. However, based on the code provided, it appears that the next statement will be the `switch` statement, as it is the next statement after the initialization of the `Kind`, `IsRV64`, `StartLoc`, and `EndLoc` variables. Within the `switch` statement, the next statement will depend on the value of the `Kind` variable. If `Kind` is equal to `Register`, the next statement will be the assignment of" LLVM,RISCV,407,"The next statement in this code snippet is: case Register: This is a switch statement, and the next case is Register." LLVM,RISCV,408,"Based on the code snippet provided, it is difficult to predict the next statement with certainty. However, we can make an educated guess based on the information provided. The `shouldForceImediateOperand` function appears to be a helper function that determines whether a particular operand should be forced to be an immediate operand. The function takes two arguments: `Name`, which is a string reference to the name of the operand, and `OperandIdx`, which is an unsigned integer representing the index of the operand. Based on the code snippet, it appears that the function" LLVM,RISCV,409,"Based on the code snippet you provided, it appears that the `shouldForceImediateOperand` function is checking if a given operand index should be forced to be an immediate operand. The function takes two arguments: `Name`, which is a string representing the name of the operand, and `OperandIdx`, which is the index of the operand. The function uses a switch statement to check the value of `OperandIdx` and return a boolean value indicating whether the operand should be forced to be an immediate operand. The switch statement checks the value of `Operand" LLVM,RISCV,410,"The next statement after the `if` statement is: `StartLoc = Reg.StartLoc;` This statement assigns the value of `Reg.StartLoc` to the variable `StartLoc`." LLVM,RISCV,411,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `assert(Reg >= && Reg <= && );` This statement is an assertion that checks if the value of `Reg` is within a certain range of values. The range is defined by the two string literals `` and ``. If the value of `Reg` is not within this range, the assertion will fail and an error message will be displayed." LLVM,RISCV,412,"The next statement of this code snippet is: emitToStreamer(Out, MCInstBuilder().addOperand(TmpReg).addExpr(RefToLinkTmpLabel));" LLVM,RISCV,413,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific values of the variables and the behavior of the functions being called. However, based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the next statement will be: emitToStreamer(Out, MCInstBuilder(SecondOpcode).addOperand(DestReg).addOperand(TmpReg).addExpr(RefToLinkTmpLabel)); This statement is similar to the previous statement, but with a different opcode (SecondOpcode) and a different expression (RefToLinkTmp" LLVM,RISCV,414,"This code snippet is from the LLVM project and is related to the assembly parser for the RISC-V instruction set architecture. The code is defining a function called `emitLoadAddress` that takes three arguments: `Inst`, `IDLoc`, and `Out`. The function is emitting a load address instruction for the RISC-V instruction set architecture. The code is checking if the object file is position-independent, and if it is, it is setting the `SecondOpcode` variable to a value based on whether the target is 64-bit or not. If the object file" LLVM,RISCV,415,"This code snippet is from the LLVM project and is related to the assembly parser. It appears to be emitting a load address instruction for a specific register and symbol. The next statement in the code snippet is: Out . EmitSymbolRef ( Inst . getOperand ( ) . getExpr ( ) , IDLoc , DestReg ) ; This statement is emitting a symbol reference for the symbol associated with the operand at index and using the destination register as the symbol reference. The IDLoc parameter is used to specify the location of" LLVM,RISCV,416,"The next statement of this code snippet is: emitToStreamer ( Out , MCInstBuilder ( Inst . Opc ) . addReg ( DestReg ) . addReg ( SrcReg ) . addImm ( Inst . Imm ) ) ;" LLVM,RISCV,417,"I cannot predict the next statement of this code snippet as it is not a complete code and the context is not clear. The code appears to be a part of a larger program and it is not possible to determine the next statement without knowing the entire program and its context. Additionally, the code snippet contains placeholders such as `` which are not defined in the snippet, making it difficult to understand the purpose of the code." LLVM,RISCV,418,"The next statement after the code snippet you provided is likely to be the return statement, which is the last statement in the function. The return statement returns the value of the `StringRef` object that was created in the previous line of code. Here's the complete code snippet with the next statement added: ``` return StringRef ( SysReg . Data , SysReg . Length ) ; ``` Note that the `StringRef` object is created using the `Data` and `Length` members of the `SysReg` object, which are assumed to be of type `char*`" LLVM,RISCV,419,"The next statement of this code snippet is: return SysReg;" LLVM,RISCV,420,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `IsValid = AsmParser::classifySymbolRef(getImm(), VK, Imm);` This statement is executed if `IsConstantImm` is false, which means that the immediate value is not a constant. In this case, the `classifySymbolRef` method of the `AsmParser` class is called to determine the type of the symbol reference. The method takes three arguments: the immediate value, the value kind, and the symbol reference. The return value of the method is assigned to `IsValid`." LLVM,RISCV,421,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return false;` Explanation: The code snippet is a method named `isBareSymbol` that takes no arguments and returns a `bool`. The method checks if the current symbol is a bare symbol, which means it is not a constant expression. The method first checks if the current symbol is an immediate value using the `isImm` method. If it is not an immediate value, the method returns `false`. If the current symbol is an immediate value, the method evaluates the constant immediate value using the `evalu" LLVM,RISCV,422,The next statement after the `if` block would be the `return false` statement. LLVM,RISCV,423,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the code depends on the specific values of the variables and the implementation of the functions being called. However, based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the code is initializing a variable `Imm` of type `int64_t` and a variable `VK` of type `MCExpr::VariantKind`. The value of `VK` is being set to `MCExpr::VK_None`, which suggests that the code is initializing a variant kind to a default value." LLVM,RISCV,424,The next statement after the `if` block would be the `return false` statement. LLVM,RISCV,425,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return IsValid && ( ( IsConstantImm && VK == MCExpr :: VK__None ) || VK == MCExpr :: VK__LO || VK == MCExpr :: VK__PCREL_LO || VK == MCExpr :: VK_MCExpr :: VK__None` constant. The `IsConstantImm` variable is being checked to see if it is true, and if it is, the `isUInt` function is being called with the `Imm` variable as an argument. The `isUInt" LLVM,RISCV,432,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `RegNo = MatchRegisterAltName(Name);` This statement is executed if the `RegNo` variable is equal to the string literal ``. The `MatchRegisterAltName` function is called with the `Name` variable as an argument, and the return value is assigned to the `RegNo` variable." LLVM,RISCV,433,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `Operands.push_back(Operand::createSysReg(Identifier, S, SysReg->Encoding, isRV64()));`" LLVM,RISCV,434,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `Operands.push_back(Operand::createReg(RegNo, S, E, isRV64()));`" LLVM,RISCV,435,"The next statement in this code snippet is: `OS << << getToken() << ;` This is because the `KindTy` variable is set to `Token`, which matches the third case in the `switch` statement. The code inside this case is executed, which writes the token to the output stream `OS`." LLVM,RISCV,436,"The next statement in this code snippet is: `OS << << getToken() << ;` This is because the `KindTy` variable is set to `Token`, which means that the `case KindTy :: Token` block will be executed. Within that block, the statement `OS << << getToken() << ;` will be executed, which will print the token to the output stream." LLVM,RISCV,437,"Based on the code snippet provided, it is difficult to predict the next statement with certainty. However, based on the context and the patterns in the code, it is likely that the next statement will be another case statement or a default statement. The code snippet appears to be part of a switch statement that is handling different cases for different types of instructions. The cases are identified by strings, and each case is handling a specific type of instruction. The code inside each case is responsible for emitting the appropriate code for that instruction. Based on the code snippet provided, it is likely that the next statement will be" LLVM,RISCV,438,"Based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the next statement will be: Parser.addAliasForDirective(, ); This is because the previous statements in the code snippet are all related to setting up the parser and its aliases, and the next statement is likely to be another call to addAliasForDirective." LLVM,RISCV,439,"Based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the next statement will be: Parser.addAliasForDirective(, ); This is because the previous statements in the code snippet are all related to setting up the parser and its aliases, and the next statement is likely to be another call to addAliasForDirective." LLVM,RISCV,440,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the value of the `Kind` variable and the implementation of the `switch` statement. However, based on the information provided, it is likely that the next statement will be the assignment of the `Reg` variable, as the `case KindTy::Register` branch is the first branch that is executed when the `Kind` variable is equal to `KindTy::Register`. Therefore, the next statement of this code snippet is likely to be: ``` Reg = o.Reg; ```" LLVM,RISCV,441,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the value of the `Kind` variable. However, based on the code snippet you provided, it appears that the next statement will be the `case KindTy::Register` block, as the `Kind` variable is being compared to `KindTy::Register`. If the `Kind` variable is equal to `KindTy::Register`, then the `Reg` variable will be assigned the value of `o.Reg`. It's also worth noting that the `switch` statement is using the `" LLVM,RISCV,442,"The next statement after the `if` block is: ``` return MatchOperand_NoMatch; ``` This statement is executed if the `matchRegisterNameHelper` function returns `true`, which means that the register name is not valid for the current instruction. The `MatchOperand_NoMatch` value is returned to indicate that the operand does not match the expected pattern." LLVM,RISCV,443,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `if (IsRegFPR64 || IsRegFPR64C) return Match_InvalidOperand;`" LLVM,RISCV,444,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific values of the variables and the behavior of the functions being called. However, based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the next statement will be: emitToStreamer(Out, MCInstBuilder(SecondOpcode).addOperand(DestReg).addOperand(TmpReg).addExpr(RefToLinkTmpLabel)); This statement is similar to the previous statement, but with a different opcode (SecondOpcode) and a different expression (RefToLinkTmp" LLVM,RISCV,445,"The next statement of this code snippet is: emitToStreamer ( Out , MCInstBuilder ( ) . addOperand ( TmpReg ) . addExpr ( RefToLinkTmpLabel ) ) ;" LLVM,RISCV,446,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet without knowing the specific implementation of the `compressInst` function and the `getSTI` and `getContext` methods. However, based on the names of these functions and methods, it is likely that the next statement will be related to the compression of the instruction. Here are a few possibilities: 1. The next statement may be a call to a function that performs the actual compression of the instruction, using the result of the `compressInst` function as input. 2. The next statement may be a call to a function that" LLVM,RISCV,447,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be: `ISA_LIT`NumInstrsCompressed++; This is because the `compressInst` function is called on the `CInst` object, and if the compression is successful (i.e., if `Res` is true), the `NumInstrsCompressed` variable is incremented." LLVM,RISCV,448,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return generateImmOutOfRangeError ( Operands , ErrorInfo , - ( << ) , ( << ) - , ) ;` This statement is part of a switch statement that handles various error cases related to immediate values in the RISC-V instruction set. The `generateImmOutOfRangeError` function is called with the `Operands` and `Error" LLVM,RISCV,449,The next statement after the `if` statement is `getParser().Lex()`. LLVM,RISCV,450,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet without knowing the context in which it is being used. However, based on the syntax and the fact that the code is checking the value of `VK` against two specific values, it is likely that the next statement will be a conditional statement, such as an `if` or `switch` statement, that will execute different code based on the value of `VK`. Without more information, it is not possible to provide a more specific answer. If you have any additional context or information about the code, I would be happy to try and help you" LLVM,RISCV,451,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `if (IsConstantImm) {` This is because the `evaluateConstantImm` function returns a boolean value indicating whether the immediate value is a constant expression. If the immediate value is a constant expression, the `IsConstantImm` variable will be set to `true`, and the code inside the `if` block will be executed." LLVM,RISCV,452,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return false;` Explanation: The code snippet is checking if the immediate value is not an immediate or if it cannot be evaluated as a constant immediate. If either of these conditions is true, the function returns false. Otherwise, it continues to the next statement." LLVM,RISCV,453,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `if (VK == MCExpr::VK_RVC_Imm) return true;`" LLVM,RISCV,454,"Based on the code snippet you provided, it appears to be a part of a function that is checking the validity of an immediate value. The function is checking whether the immediate value is a constant or not, and if it is not, it is classifying the symbol reference and checking if it is a valid PC-relative, GOT, TLS-GOT, or TLS-GD reference. The next statement of the code snippet you provided is: IsValid = AsmParser::classifySymbolRef(getImm(), VK, Imm); This statement is classifying the symbol" LLVM,RISCV,455,"The next statement of this code snippet is: return isUInt < > ( Imm ) && ( VK == MCExpr :: VK__None || VK == MCExpr :: VK__HI || VK == MCExpr :: VK__TPREL_HI ) ;" LLVM,RISCV,456,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `case Match_InvalidSImm6NonZero :`" LLVM,RISCV,457,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `RegNo = MatchRegisterName(Name);` This line assigns the result of the `MatchRegisterName` function to the `RegNo` variable. The `MatchRegisterName` function is not defined in the code snippet provided, so it is not possible to determine what it does or what value it returns. However, based on the name of the function, it is likely that it attempts to match the register name in the `Name` parameter with a register name in the target architecture. If the match is successful, the function returns the register number, which" LLVM,RISCV,458,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `if ( RegNo == ) RegNo = MatchRegisterAltName ( Name ) ;` This statement checks if the register number `RegNo` is equal to the value of the constant `NUM_LIT`. If it is, then the `MatchRegisterAltName` function is called with the `Name` argument, and the return value is assigned to `RegNo`." LLVM,RISCV,459,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `case AsmToken::Identifier:`" LLVM,RISCV,460,"Based on the code snippet provided, it is difficult to predict the next statement with certainty. However, based on the pattern of the code, it appears that the next statement will be another case statement with a similar structure to the previous ones. The code is using a switch statement to handle different cases, where each case is handling a different type of instruction. The cases are identified by a string literal, which is used to determine which case to execute. The code inside each case is responsible for emitting the appropriate code for the instruction being handled. Based on the pattern of the code, it is likely that" LLVM,RISCV,461,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it appears to be part of a larger function and the context is not provided. However, based on the syntax and the fact that the function appears to be emitting code for a specific instruction, it is likely that the next statement will be another case statement or a default statement that handles a different instruction. It is also possible that the next statement will be a statement that handles the case where the instruction is not recognized, such as a default statement or a statement that throws an exception. Without more context, it is not possible" LLVM,RISCV,462,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be the return statement, which returns an error message to the caller. The error message is constructed by concatenating several strings using the `+` operator. The strings are: * `ErrorLoc`: The location of the error. * `Msg`: The error message. * ``: A string literal that is not specified in the code snippet. * `Twine ( Lower )`: A string that is constructed by calling the `Twine` function with the `Lower` argument. * `Twine ( Upper )`: A" LLVM,RISCV,463,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be: `return true;` The `generateImmOutOfRangeError` function is checking if the immediate operand is out of range, and if it is, it generates an error message. The function returns `true` if the immediate operand is out of range, and `false` otherwise. The code snippet you provided is checking if the immediate operand is out of range by comparing its value to the `Lower` and `Upper` bounds. If the immediate operand is out of range, the function generates an error message using the" LLVM,RISCV,464,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the `evaluateConstantImm` function is not specified. However, based on the name of the function and the parameters it takes, it is likely that the function will evaluate the constant immediate value `Imm` and return a boolean value indicating whether the evaluation was successful. Therefore, the next statement of this code snippet is likely to be a conditional statement that checks the return value of the `evaluateConstantImm` function and performs some action based on the result. For example: ```" LLVM,RISCV,465,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `IsValid = AsmParser :: classifySymbolRef ( getImm ( ) , VK , Imm ) ;` This statement is inside the `if` block, which means it will only be executed if `IsConstantImm` is false. The statement assigns the result of `AsmParser::classifySymbolRef` to `IsValid`. The `AsmParser::classifySymbolRef` function is not defined in the code snippet you provided, so it is not possible to determine what" LLVM,RISCV,466,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `isInt` function and the value of the `Imm` variable. However, based on the syntax and the context of the code, it is likely that the next statement will be a conditional statement that checks the value of the `IsValid` variable and performs some action based on its value." LLVM,RISCV,467,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return IsValid && ( VK == MCExpr :: VK__None || VK == MCExpr :: VK__LO );` This statement is a return statement that returns a boolean value indicating whether the expression is valid and the value kind is either `MCExpr::VK_None` or `MCExpr::VK_LO`. The `IsValid` variable is set to `true` if" LLVM,RISCV,468,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return IsConstantImm && isShiftedUInt < , > ( Imm ) && ( Imm != ) && VK == MCExpr :: VK__None;` This statement is a return statement that returns a boolean value indicating whether the given immediate value `Imm` is a constant immediate value and is shifted by a certain number of bits. The function `isShifted" LLVM,RISCV,469,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet without knowing the context and the specific values of the variables and constants used in the code. However, based on the syntax and the structure of the code, it appears to be a part of a function that is checking whether a given value is a constant immediate value and whether it is a shifted unsigned integer value less than a certain value. The function is also checking whether the value is not equal to a specific value and whether the value has a specific kind of value (e.g. integer, floating-point, etc.). Without more information, it is" LLVM,RISCV,470,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `evaluateConstantImm` function and the value of the `Imm` variable. However, based on the name of the function and the variable, it is likely that the next statement will be related to the evaluation of a constant expression. Here are a few possibilities: 1. The next statement could be a call to another function that takes the result of the `evaluateConstantImm` function as an argument, such as `evaluateConstantExpr`." LLVM,RISCV,471,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific inputs and the behavior of the `evaluateConstantImm` function. However, based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the next statement will be a return statement that returns a boolean value indicating whether the expression is a constant immediate value that is not equal to a specific value and has a variant kind of `VK_None`." LLVM,RISCV,472,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `evaluateConstantImm` function and the value of the `Imm` variable. However, based on the name of the function and the variable, it is likely that the next statement will be related to the evaluation of a constant expression. Here are a few possibilities: 1. The next statement could be a call to another function that takes the result of the `evaluateConstantImm` function as an argument, such as `evaluateConstantExpr`." LLVM,RISCV,473,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the `evaluateConstantImm` function is not specified. However, based on the name of the function and the parameters it takes, it is likely that the function will evaluate the constant immediate value `Imm` and return a boolean value indicating whether the evaluation was successful. Therefore, the next statement of this code snippet is likely to be a conditional statement that checks the return value of the `evaluateConstantImm` function and performs some action based on the result. For example: ```" LLVM,RISCV,474,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be a case statement that handles the different variants of the `VariantKind` enum. The code snippet is defining a `MCExpr` struct that contains a `VariantKind` field, and the next statement is likely to be a case statement that handles the different values of the `VariantKind` enum. For example, the next statement could be: ``` case VK_Integer: // handle integer variant break; case VK_Float: // handle float variant break; case VK_String" LLVM,RISCV,475,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet without knowing the context and the purpose of the code. However, based on the syntax and the variables used, it appears to be a part of a function that is checking if a given value is a constant immediate value and if it is shifted by a certain amount. The function is also checking if the value is of a specific type () and if it has a specific value (MCExpr :: VK__None). Without more information," LLVM,RISCV,476,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `if (IsConstantImm && (Imm & 0x100) == 0) {`" LLVM,RISCV,477,"The next statement in the code snippet is: `return generateImmOutOfRangeError(Operands, ErrorInfo, -((1 << 10) - 1), (1 << 10) - 1, ""Invalid SImm10Lsb0000"");` This statement is a call to the `generateImmOutOfRangeError` function, which is defined earlier in the code snippet. The function takes four arguments: `Operands`, `ErrorInfo`, `MinValue`, and `MaxValue`. The `MinValue` and `MaxValue`" LLVM,RISCV,478,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `getParser().eatToEndOfStatement();`" LLVM,RISCV,479,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `getLexer().Lex();`" LLVM,RISCV,480,The next statement after the `if` block is `return false;`. LLVM,RISCV,481,"The next statement after the `if` block is `Error ( getLoc ( ) , ) ;`. This statement will be executed if the `if` condition is not met, which means that `parseImmediate ( Operands )` did not return `MatchOperand_Success` or `getLexer ( ) . is ( AsmToken :: LParen )` is not true. The `Error ( getLoc ( ) , ) ;` statement will print an error message to the console, indicating that there was an error in the assembly" LLVM,RISCV,482,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `setAvailableFeatures(ComputeAvailableFeatures(STI.getFeatureBits()));` This statement sets the available features for the target architecture based on the feature bits provided by the `STI` object. The `ComputeAvailableFeatures` function is called to compute the available features based on the feature bits, and the result is passed to the `setAvailableFeatures` function to set the available features for the target architecture." LLVM,RISCV,483,"The next statement of this code snippet is: emitToStreamer(Out, MCInstBuilder(Inst.Opc).addReg(DestReg).addReg(SrcReg).addImm(Inst.Imm));" LLVM,RISCV,484,"The next statement of this code snippet is: emitToStreamer(Out, MCInstBuilder(Inst.Opc).addReg(DestReg).addReg(SrcReg).addImm(Inst.Imm));" LLVM,RISCV,485,"The next statement in the code snippet is: emitToStreamer ( Out , MCInstBuilder ( Inst . Opc ) . addReg ( DestReg ) . addReg ( SrcReg ) . addReg ( SrcReg ) ) ;" LLVM,RISCV,486,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `Opcode = MCBinaryExpr::BINOP_ADD;`" LLVM,RISCV,487,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `if (getLexer().isNot(AsmToken::EndOfStatement)) {` This is because the previous statement, `if (parseOperand(Operands, Name)) return true;`, did not match, so the control flow falls through to the next statement, which is the `if` statement with the condition `getLexer().isNot(AsmToken::EndOfStatement)`." LLVM,RISCV,488,The next statement after the `llvm_unreachable` call is the `case 'i' :` statement. LLVM,RISCV,489,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `Inst.addOperand(MCOperand::createImm(N));` This is because the `addVTypeIOperands` function is adding an immediate operand to the `Inst` instruction, and the `assert` statement is checking that the number of operands being added is equal to the number of operands expected for the instruction (which is represented by the `` placeholder). The `assert` statement also checks that the operand being added is an immediate operand (represented by the `Operand`, and the `createReg` function is expected to return a `std::unique_ptr` to the created object. The `return` statement is used to return the created object to the caller of the function." LLVM,RISCV,491,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be: `Op->IsRV64 = IsRV64;` This is because the previous statement sets the `Op->SysReg.Data`, `Op->SysReg.Length`, and `Op->SysReg.Encoding` fields, and the `IsRV64` field is not set in the code snippet provided. The `IsRV64` field is likely to be set in the next statement to complete the initialization of the `Operand` object." LLVM,RISCV,492,"The next statement in this code snippet is: `SrcReg = DestReg;` This statement assigns the value of `DestReg` to `SrcReg`." LLVM,RISCV,493,"Based on the code snippet provided, it is difficult to predict the next statement with certainty. However, based on the patterns and conventions used in the code, it is likely that the next statement will be another `emitToStreamer` call, possibly with a different set of arguments. The `emitToStreamer` function is used to emit instructions to a streamer, which is a class that provides a way to write instructions to a stream of bytes. The function takes two arguments: the first is the streamer to write to, and the second is the instruction to write. In the code snippet" LLVM,RISCV,494,"Based on the code snippet provided, it appears to be a part of a function that is generating machine code for a specific instruction. The function takes an output stream, an instruction, and a number of operands as inputs, and it appears to be using a builder pattern to construct the machine code for the instruction. The code snippet you provided is incomplete, so it's difficult to say exactly what the next statement will be. However, based on the code you provided, it seems likely that the next statement will be another call to `emitToStreamer`, possibly with a different set of arguments." LLVM,RISCV,495,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the code depends on the specific values of the variables and the implementation of the `Kind` and `VType` types. However, based on the syntax and the context of the code, it is likely that the next statement after the `return` statement will be the end of the function or method, as the `return` statement is typically used to return a value from a function or method. Therefore, the next statement after the `return` statement is likely to be the end of the function or" LLVM,RISCV,496,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be a return statement, as the function `isVType` is declared to return a `bool` value. The function checks the value of the `Kind` member variable and returns `true` if it is equal to `KindTy::VType`." LLVM,RISCV,497,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the `isVType` function is not specified. However, based on the name of the function, it is likely that it returns a boolean value indicating whether the current object is of type `VType`." LLVM,RISCV,498,"The next statement in the code snippet is: `return generateImmOutOfRangeError ( Operands , ErrorInfo , - ( << ) , ( << ) - , ) ;` This statement is a function call to `generateImmOutOfRangeError`, which is a function that generates an error message when an immediate value is out of range. The function takes several arguments: *" LLVM,RISCV,499,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `if (getLexer()->isNot(AsmToken::RParen)) {` This is because the previous `if` statement has an `else` clause that returns `MatchOperand_ParseFail` if the condition is not met. Therefore, the next statement to be executed is the `if` statement that checks if the current token is not an `RParen`." LLVM,RISCV,500,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be: `getParser().Lex();` This is because the code is checking if the current token is not a left parenthesis (`AsmToken::LParen`) using the `isNot()` method of the `Lexer` class. If the current token is not a left parenthesis, it means that the parser has reached the end of the operand and it needs to consume the next token using the `Lex()` method." LLVM,RISCV,501,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `Operands.push_back(Operand::createImm(Res, S, E, isRV64()));` This statement adds an operand to the `Operands` vector, which is a vector of `Operand` objects. The `createImm` method is used to create an immediate operand, which is an operand that represents a constant value. The `Res` variable is passed as the first argument to `createImm`, which is the value of the immediate operand." LLVM,RISCV,502,"The next statement in this code snippet is likely to be a call to the `Match` function, as it is the next logical step in the control flow of the code. The `Match` function is not explicitly defined in the code snippet, but it is likely to be a function that takes a `MCExpr` as an argument and returns a `MatchOperand` value indicating whether the operand matches or not. The `Match` function is likely to be used to check if the symbol `Sym` matches the operand being parsed. If the symbol does not match, the function will return `MatchOperand" LLVM,RISCV,503,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be: `Res = MCSymbolRefExpr :: create ( Sym , MCSymbolRefExpr :: VK_None , getContext ( ) ) ;` This statement creates a new `MCSymbolRefExpr` object with the symbol `Sym` and the variant kind `VK_None`. The `getContext` function is called to get the current context, which is then passed to the `create` method. The resulting `MCSymbolRefExpr` object is stored in the `Res` variable." LLVM,RISCV,504,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be: `Operands.push_back(Operand::createImm(Res, S, E, isRV64()));` This is because the previous statement, `Res = MCExpr::create(Res, Kind, getContext());`, creates a new `MCExpr` object with the `Kind` and `getContext()` parameters, and the `Operands` vector is being pushed back with a new `Operand` object created using the `createImm" LLVM,RISCV,505,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `if ( Parser . getTok ( ) . isNot ( AsmToken :: String ) ) return Error ( Parser . getTok ( ) . getLoc ( ) , ) ;` This statement checks if the current token is not a string token, and if it's not, it returns an error." LLVM,RISCV,506,"The next statement in this code snippet is: `case AsmToken::Percent:`." LLVM,RISCV,507,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `Operands.push_back(Operand::createReg(RegNo, S, E, isRV64()));` This statement is pushing a new operand onto the `Operands` vector. The operand is created using the `createReg` method of the `Operand` class, and it is initialized with the register number `RegNo`, the source location `S`, the end location `E`, and the `isRV64()` flag." LLVM,RISCV,508,"Based on the code snippet you provided, it appears that the next statement after the `if` statement would be the `Error` function call. The `if` statement checks the result of `getParser().parseExpression(Res)`, and if it is not successful (i.e., the result is not `MatchOperand_ParseFail`), it checks the kind of the expression in `Res`. If the kind is not `MCExpr::ExprKind::SymbolRef` or if the variant kind is not `MCSymbolRefExpr::VariantKind::VK_PLT`, it calls the `Error" LLVM,RISCV,509,"The next statement in the code snippet is: `StringRef Name = getLexer().getTok().getIdentifier();`" LLVM,RISCV,510,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific input and the behavior of the `getLexer` and `getParser` functions. However, based on the code provided, it appears that the next statement will be: `Operands.push_back(Operand::createReg(RegNo, S, E, isRV64()));` This statement will add a new operand to the `Operands` vector, where the operand is a register with the name `RegNo`" LLVM,RISCV,511,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `Operands.push_back(Operand::createVType(VTypeI, S, isRV64()));` This statement is pushing a new operand onto the `Operands` vector, which is a vector of operands for the current instruction. The operand being pushed is a `VType` operand, which is a type of operand that represents a vector type in the RISC-V instruction set. The `VTypeI` variable is being used to encode the vector type" LLVM,RISCV,512,"Based on the code snippet provided, it is difficult to predict the next statement with certainty. However, based on the context and the syntax of the code, it appears that the next statement is likely to be a call to a function or method that is not yet defined in the code snippet. The code snippet defines a parser and sets up some aliases for directives, and then it appears to be checking the availability of certain features based on the ABI name provided in the options. If the ABI name ends with a specific string literal and the feature bits for the current STI (System Target Information) do" LLVM,RISCV,513,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the program depends on the specific values of the variables and the implementation of the `make_unique` function. However, based on the code snippet, it appears that the next statement will be an assignment to the `Reg` member of the `Operand` object created by `make_unique`. The assignment will set the `Reg` member to the value of the `Register` variable, which is a register number. Here is a breakdown of the code snippet: * `auto Op = make_" LLVM,RISCV,514,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `make_unique` function and the `Operand` class. However, based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the next statement will be an assignment to the `Tok` member of the `Op` object, which is an instance of the `Operand` class. The `make_unique` function is a factory function that creates a unique pointer to an object of the specified type. In this case, it is creating a unique pointer to an object of type `Oper" LLVM,RISCV,515,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return IsValid && VK == MCExpr :: VK__None;` This statement is a return statement that returns a boolean value indicating whether the expression is valid and the value kind is not `MCExpr::VK__None`. The `IsValid` variable is set to `true` if the expression is a constant immediate or a valid symbol reference, and `false` otherwise. The `VK` variable is set to the value kind" LLVM,RISCV,516,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `evaluateConstantImm` function and the values of the `Imm` and `VK` variables. However, based on the names of the variables and the context of the code, it is likely that the next statement will be related to the evaluation of a constant expression. Here are a few possibilities: 1. The next statement could be a call to the `evaluateConstantImm` function again, with a different set of arguments. 2. The" LLVM,RISCV,517,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return IsValid && ( VK == MCExpr :: VK__None || VK == MCExpr :: VK__LO ) ;` This statement is a return statement that returns the value of the `IsValid` variable, which is a boolean value indicating whether the immediate value is valid or not. The `IsValid` variable is set to `true` if the immediate value is a valid constant immediate" LLVM,RISCV,518,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `IsValid = isInt < > ( Imm ) ;` This is because the `if` statement checks if `IsConstantImm` is false, and if it is, it sets `IsValid` to the result of `AsmParser::classifySymbolRef(getImm(), VK, Imm)`. However, since `IsConstantImm` is true, the `else` branch is not executed, and the next statement is the one after the `if` statement, which is `" LLVM,RISCV,519,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be the evaluation of the `evaluateConstantImm` function, which is called with the `Imm` and `VK` variables as arguments. The function is expected to return a boolean value indicating whether the immediate value is a constant and can be represented as a 12-bit unsigned integer. The code snippet is likely part of a function that generates machine code for a specific instruction set architecture (ISA), and the `isUImm12` function is used to check whether a given immediate value can be encoded as a 12" LLVM,RISCV,520,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet without knowing the context and the specific values of the variables and constants used in the code. However, based on the syntax and the names of the variables, it appears that the code is checking if a given value is a constant immediate value, and if it is, it is checking if the value is less than a certain number (). If the value is less than that number, it is checking if the value is a valid immediate value for a specific instruction set architecture (ISA) (). If all of" LLVM,RISCV,521,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `evaluateConstantImm` and `classifySymbolRef` functions, as well as the values of the `Imm` and `VK` variables. However, based on the names of the functions and the context of the code, it is likely that the next statement will be a conditional statement that checks the value of the `IsValid` variable, which is set to the result of the `classifySymbolRef` function if the `IsConstantImm` variable" LLVM,RISCV,522,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the code depends on the specific values of the variables and the implementation of the `isUInt` function. However, based on the information provided, it is likely that the next statement will be a comparison of the `IsValid` variable with the result of the `isUInt` function. The `isUInt` function is likely to return a boolean value indicating whether the input value is a valid unsigned integer, and the comparison with `IsValid` will determine whether the input value is valid or not." LLVM,RISCV,523,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return IsConstantImm && isUInt < > ( Imm ) && VK == MCExpr :: VK__None ;` This statement is a return statement that returns a boolean value indicating whether the expression is a constant immediate value and has the correct variant kind. The `IsConstantImm` variable is set to the result of the `evaluateConstantImm` function, which evaluates the constant immediate value of the expression" LLVM,RISCV,524,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be: ``` if (IsConstantImm) { // do something with Imm } ``` This is because the `evaluateConstantImm` function is called with the `Imm` variable as an argument, and the return value of this function is stored in the `IsConstantImm` variable. If the `IsConstantImm` variable is true, then the `Imm` variable is a constant immediate value, and the code inside the `if` statement will be executed." LLVM,RISCV,525,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `case Match_InvalidUImm5: return generateImmOutOfRangeError ( Operands , ErrorInfo , , ( << ) - ) ;` This statement is part of a `switch` statement that handles different cases of matching instructions. The `Match_InvalidUImm5` case is triggered when the immediate operand is not within the valid range of 0 to 31. The `generateImmOutOf" LLVM,RISCV,526,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `Identifier = getParser().parseIdentifier();`" LLVM,RISCV,527,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `getParser().Lex();` This statement calls the `Lex` method of the `getParser` object, which is an instance of the `Parser` class. The `Lex` method is used to lexically analyze the input stream and return the next token." LLVM,RISCV,528,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return Error(Loc, );` This statement is executed if the lexer is not at the end of a statement, which means that there is an error in the input stream. The `Error` function is called with the current location `Loc` and a string literal `` as arguments. The `Error` function is used to report an error to the user and return a value indicating that an error has occurred." LLVM,RISCV,529,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be: `getParser().Lex();` This is because the code is checking if the current token is not a left parenthesis (`AsmToken::LParen`) and if it is not, it will call the `Lex()` method on the parser to advance to the next token." LLVM,RISCV,530,"Based on the code snippet provided, it appears to be a part of a function that is trying to parse an operand for an instruction. The function is using a lexer to tokenize the input and then checking if the token matches the expected operand. The next statement of the code snippet is likely to be: `if (getLexer().isNot(AsmToken::RParen)) {` This statement checks if the current token is not a right parenthesis, and if it is not, it will call the `Error` function with the current location and a string" LLVM,RISCV,531,"The next statement after the `if` statement is the `return` statement. The `return` statement will return the value of the expression `parseMemOpBaseReg(Operands) != MatchOperand_Success`. The `parseMemOpBaseReg` function is not defined in the code snippet you provided, so it is not possible to determine what it will return. However, based on the name of the function, it appears to be parsing a memory operand and returning a value indicating whether the operand was successfully parsed. Therefore, the next statement after the `if` statement will return the" LLVM,RISCV,532,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `const MCExpr * ModExpr = MCExpr :: create ( SubExpr , VK , getContext ( ) ) ;` This statement creates a new `MCExpr` object with the given `SubExpr`, `VK`, and `getContext()` as parameters. The resulting `MCExpr` object is stored in the `ModExpr` variable." LLVM,RISCV,533,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be: `if (SubExpr->getKind() != MCExpr::SymbolRef) {` This is because the code is checking the kind of the parsed expression `SubExpr` and if it is not a symbol reference, it will return an error." LLVM,RISCV,534,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific values of the variables and the behavior of the functions called. However, based on the code snippet, it appears that the next statement will be: Operands.push_back(Operand::createReg(RegNo, S, E)); This statement adds a new operand to the operands list, where the operand is a register with the number RegNo, and the size and extension are specified by the variables S and E." LLVM,RISCV,535,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `ComputeAvailableFeatures` function and the `STI` object. However, based on the name of the function and the object, it is likely that the next statement will be related to setting the available features for the `STI` object." LLVM,RISCV,536,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `ComputeAvailableFeatures` function and the `STI` object. However, based on the name of the function and the object, it is likely that the next statement will be related to setting the available features for the `STI` object." LLVM,RISCV,537,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be the initialization of the `Kind` member variable, which is a `MCParsedAsmOperand::Kind` type. The statement is likely to be: ``` Kind = o.Kind; ``` This statement initializes the `Kind` member variable of the current `Operand` object with the value of the `Kind` member variable of the `o` object, which is passed as a parameter to the constructor." LLVM,RISCV,538,"Based on the code snippet provided, it appears to be a part of a function that is handling errors related to the encoding of instructions for a specific instruction set architecture (ISA). The function is using a switch statement to handle different types of errors, and each case is handling a specific type of error. The next statement in the code snippet is: `case Match_MissingFeature : return Error ( IDLoc , ) ;` This line is handling the case where a feature is missing in the instruction. It is returning an error with the location of the instruction and a" LLVM,RISCV,539,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return IsValid && ( ( IsConstantImm && VK == MCExpr :: VK__None ) || VK == MCExpr :: VK__LO || VK == MCExpr :: VK__PCREL_LO ) ;` This statement is a return statement that returns a boolean value indicating whether the expression is" LLVM,RISCV,540,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `IsValid = isInt < > ( Imm ) ;` This is because the `if` statement that checks whether `IsConstantImm` is true or false has already been evaluated, and since `IsConstantImm` is false, the code will execute the `else` block, which sets `IsValid` to `isInt < > ( Imm )`." LLVM,RISCV,541,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be: `VK = MCExpr::getVariantKind ();` This is because the code is checking if the `isImm()` method returns `false`, and if it does, it returns `false` immediately. Otherwise, it continues to the next statement, which is likely to be the `getVariantKind()` method." LLVM,RISCV,542,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return IsConstantImm && isInt < > ( Imm ) && ( Imm != ) && VK == MCExpr :: VK__None;` This statement is a return statement that returns a boolean value indicating whether the immediate value is non-zero and satisfies certain conditions. The conditions are: * `IsConstantImm`: The immediate value must be a constant expression. * `isInt" LLVM,RISCV,543,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the `evaluateConstantImm` function is not specified. However, based on the name of the function and the parameters it takes, it is likely that the function will evaluate the constant immediate value `Imm` and return a boolean value indicating whether the evaluation was successful. Therefore, the next statement of this code snippet is likely to be a conditional statement that checks the return value of the `evaluateConstantImm` function and performs some action based on the result. For example: ```" LLVM,RISCV,544,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `evaluateConstantImm` function and the values of the `Imm` and `VK` variables. However, based on the context of the code snippet, it is likely that the next statement will be a call to the `evaluateConstantImm` function, which will evaluate the constant immediate value of the instruction. The function will return a boolean value indicating whether the immediate value is constant or not. If the immediate value is not constant, the code will continue to" LLVM,RISCV,545,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `IsValid = AsmParser::classifySymbolRef(getImm(), VK, Imm);`" LLVM,RISCV,546,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return false;` Explanation: The `isUImm20LUI` function is checking if the immediate value is a valid `LUI` instruction. If the immediate value is not a constant, it will be classified as a symbolic reference. The `AsmParser::classifySymbolRef` function will check if the symbolic reference is a valid `LUI` instruction. If it is not, the function will return `false`." LLVM,RISCV,547,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return false;` Explanation: The `ParseInstruction` method is parsing an instruction and its operands. It first pushes a token onto the `Operands` vector, then checks if the next token is an end-of-statement token. If it is, the method returns `false`. If it is not, the method continues to parse the operands and checks if there are any more operands to parse. If there are, it increments the `OperandIdx` variable and continues to parse the operands. If" LLVM,RISCV,548,"The next statement in this code snippet is: `case Match_InvalidSImm12Lsb0 :`" LLVM,RISCV,549,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return IsConstantImm && ( Imm != ) && ( isUInt < > ( Imm ) || ( Imm >= && Imm <= ) ) && VK == MCExpr :: VK__None ;` This statement is a return statement that returns a boolean value indicating whether the given expression is a constant immediate value that is not equal to a" LLVM,RISCV,550,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return IsConstantImm && ( Imm != ) && ( isUInt < > ( Imm ) || ( Imm >= && Imm <= ) ) && VK == MCExpr :: VK__None;` This statement is a return statement that returns a boolean value indicating whether the given immediate value is a constant immediate and meets certain conditions. The conditions" LLVM,RISCV,551,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return IsValid && ( VK == MCExpr :: VK__None || VK == MCExpr :: VK__LO );` This statement is a return statement that returns the value of the `IsValid` variable and the result of the logical AND operation between `VK` and the constant `MCExpr :: VK__None` or `MCExpr ::" LLVM,RISCV,552,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return IsValid && ( VK == MCExpr :: VK__None || VK == MCExpr :: VK__LO ) ;` This statement is a return statement that returns the value of the `IsValid` variable and the result of the logical AND operation between `IsValid` and the result of the comparison between `VK` and the two constants `MCExpr" LLVM,RISCV,553,"Based on the code snippet you provided, it appears that the next statement after the `switch` statement would be the `default` case. The `default` case is used when none of the other cases match the value of the `Match` variable. In this case, the `default` case is not explicitly defined, so the next statement would be the end of the `switch` statement. It's worth noting that the `switch` statement is a control flow statement that allows you to execute different blocks of code based on the value of a variable. The `case` statements are used to define" LLVM,RISCV,554,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `getParser().Lex();` This statement is calling the `Lex` method of the `getParser()` object, which is likely a parser object that is being used to parse the input stream. The `Lex` method is responsible for lexical analysis, which is the process of breaking up the input stream into individual tokens." LLVM,RISCV,555,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `getParser().eatToEndOfStatement();`" LLVM,RISCV,556,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific values of the variables and the behavior of the functions being called. However, based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the next statement will be a comparison of the value of `Imm` to some other value. The code snippet first retrieves the immediate value of the operand at index `` from the instruction `Inst` using the `getOperand()` method. It then retrieves the immediate value of the operand at index `` from the instruction" LLVM,RISCV,557,"Based on the code snippet provided, it appears to be a part of a loop that is iterating over a sequence of instructions. The loop is checking the opcode of each instruction in the sequence, and if the opcode matches a specific value, it is performing some action. Based on this information, it is difficult to predict the next statement of the code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific instructions in the sequence and the values of the opcodes. However, some possible next statements could include: * If the opcode of the current instruction is equal to a specific value, perform some" LLVM,RISCV,558,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific values of the variables and the behavior of the functions being called. However, based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the next statement will be: `emitToStreamer(Out, MCInstBuilder(Inst.Opc).addReg(DestReg).addReg(SrcReg).addImm(Inst.Imm));` This is because the `else` block is executed when the `if` condition is not met, and the `else` block contains a call to" LLVM,RISCV,559,"Based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the next statement will be: emitLoadStoreSymbol ( Inst , , IDLoc , Out , true ) ; This is because the previous statement in the code snippet is a case statement with the value , and the next statement after the case statement is the emitLoadStoreSymbol function. The function is called with the Inst, IDLoc, and Out parameters, and the last parameter is set to true." LLVM,RISCV,560,"Based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the next statement after the `switch` statement would be the `if` statement. The `switch` statement is checking the value of `Inst` and executing different code based on the value. The `if` statement is checking the value of `checkPseudoAddTPRel(Inst, Operands)` and returning `true` if it is `true`. Therefore, the next statement after the `switch` statement would be the `if` statement." LLVM,RISCV,561,"This code snippet appears to be part of a function that is adding immediate operands to an instruction. The function takes two arguments: `Inst`, which is a reference to a `MCInst` object, and `N`, which is an unsigned integer. The first line of the code snippet is an assertion that `N` is equal to a specific value (represented by ``) and that a string literal (represented by ``) is not empty. The assertion is used to ensure that the function is being called with the correct arguments. The next" LLVM,RISCV,562,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be the assignment of the result of the `evaluateConstantImm` function to the `IsConstant` variable. The `evaluateConstantImm` function takes three arguments: the first is the immediate value to be evaluated, the second is the variant kind to be used for the evaluation, and the third is a boolean flag indicating whether the immediate value is a constant. In this code snippet, the `getImm` function is called to retrieve the immediate value to be evaluated, and the `VK` variable is set to `" LLVM,RISCV,563,"Based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the next statement will be: `if ( ( TargetFlags & ) && ( Inst . getNumOperands ( ) == ) ) CheckReg = Inst . getOperand ( ) . getReg ( ) ;` This is because the previous `if` statement was not executed, and the next `if` statement checks if the `TargetFlags` have the `` flag set and if the number of operands in the instruction is equal to `<" LLVM,RISCV,564,"Based on the code snippet provided, it is difficult to predict the next statement with certainty. However, based on the context and the structure of the code, it is likely that the next statement will be a conditional statement that checks the value of `TargetFlags` and `Inst.getOpcode()`. The code appears to be checking whether the target flags and opcode of an instruction are valid, and if not, it returns an error. The next statement is likely to be a conditional statement that checks the value of `TargetFlags` and `Inst.getOpcode()` and returns an error if the values are not" LLVM,RISCV,565,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `Inst` class and the `addOperand` method. However, based on the syntax and the fact that the `createImm` method is being called on the `MCOperand` class, it is likely that the next statement will be an assignment of the result of the `createImm` method to a variable or field. For example, the next statement could be: ``` Inst.addOperand(MCOperand.createImm(VType" LLVM,RISCV,566,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `Inst` class and the `addOperand` method. However, based on the syntax and the fact that the `createImm` method is being called on the `MCOperand` class, it is likely that the next statement will be an assignment of the result of the `createImm` method to a variable or field. For example, the next statement could be: ``` Inst.addOperand(MCOperand.createImm(VType" LLVM,RISCV,567,"The next statement of the code snippet is: Op -> VType . Encoding = ( SewLog2 << ) | Flmul ;" LLVM,RISCV,568,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific values of the variables and the behavior of the functions being called. However, based on the context and the structure of the code, it appears that the next statement will be an assignment to the `Op` object's `Encoding` field. The code is checking the values of the `SewLog2`, `Flmul`, and `LmulLog2` variables, and based on those values, it is setting the `Encoding` field of the `Op` object to a specific value. The `" LLVM,RISCV,569,"Based on the code snippet you provided, it seems like the next statement after the `switch` statement would be the code that is executed when the value of `Lmul` is equal to the string literal ``. Without knowing the specific value of `` or the rest of the code, it is difficult to predict exactly what the next statement will be. However, based on the syntax of the code snippet you provided, it appears that the next statement will be a `return` statement that returns a string literal." LLVM,RISCV,570,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific values of the string literals and the context in which the code is being executed. However, based on the syntax and structure of the code, it appears that the next statement will be another `case` statement, possibly with a different string literal." LLVM,RISCV,571,"Based on the code snippet you provided, it appears that the next statement after the `assert` statement would be `Buf.append(getSEWStr(VType.Sew))`. This is because the `assert` statement is used to check that the `Kind` variable is equal to `KindTy::VType` and that the `VType` variable is not null. If the assertion fails, the program will terminate with an error message. After the `assert` statement, the code snippet appends the result of the `getSEWStr` function to the `Buf`" LLVM,RISCV,572,"Based on the code snippet you provided, it appears that the next statement after the `assert` statement would be `Buf.append(getSEWStr(VType.Sew))`. This is because the `assert` statement is used to check that the `Kind` variable is equal to `KindTy::VType` and that the `VType` variable is not null. If the assertion fails, the program will terminate with an error message. After the `assert` statement, the code snippet appends the result of the `getSEWStr` function to the `Buf`" LLVM,RISCV,573,"Based on the code snippet you provided, it appears that the next statement after the `switch` statement would be the `case` statement for `Match_InvalidBareSymbol`. The `case` statement for `Match_InvalidBareSymbol` is the last one in the `switch` statement, so it would be the last one executed if the `switch` statement is entered. Within the `case` statement for `Match_InvalidBareSymbol`, there is a call to the `Error` function with the `ErrorLoc` and `STR_LIT` arguments. This function is likely" LLVM,RISCV,574,"Based on the code snippet you provided, it appears to be a part of a function that parses a register name in an assembly language. The function takes an `OperandVector` and a `Register` as arguments, and it appears to be using a switch statement to check the type of the register. Based on the information provided, it is not possible to predict the next statement of the code snippet with certainty. However, based on the context and the information provided, it is likely that the next statement will be a case statement that checks the type of the register. Here is an example of" LLVM,RISCV,575,"The next statement in the code snippet is: `TailAgnostic = false;`" LLVM,RISCV,576,"Based on the code snippet provided, it is difficult to predict the next statement with certainty. However, we can make an educated guess based on the patterns and conventions used in the code. The code appears to be checking for errors in a machine instruction. It is checking if the destination register is the same as the register being checked, and if so, it returns an error. It is also checking if the target flags are set and if the instruction has the correct number of operands. Based on these observations, it is likely that the next statement will be a check for another error condition, such as" LLVM,RISCV,577,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `if ( ( TargetFlags & ) && ( Inst . getNumOperands ( ) == ) ) CheckReg = Inst . getOperand ( ) . getReg ( ) ;` This statement is checking if the `TargetFlags` variable has the specified bit set and if the number of operands in the instruction is equal to a specific value. If both conditions are true, it sets the `CheckReg` variable to the register number of the operand at the specified" LLVM,RISCV,578,"Based on the code snippet you provided, it appears that the next statement will be: `Op.Reg.RegNum = convertFPR64ToFPR32(Reg);` This is because the code is checking if `IsRegFPR64C` is true and `Kind` is equal to `MCK_FPR32C`. If both of these conditions are true, then the code will execute the statement `Op.Reg.RegNum = convertFPR64ToFPR32(Reg);`." LLVM,RISCV,579,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `assert ( N == && ) ;` This statement is an assertion that checks whether the value of `N` is equal to `` and whether the value of `` is non-empty. If either of these conditions is not met, the assertion will fail and an error message will be displayed." LLVM,RISCV,580,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `assert ( N == && ) ;` This statement is an assertion that checks whether the value of `N` is equal to `` and whether the value of `` is non-empty. If either of these conditions is not met, the assertion will fail and an error message will be displayed." LLVM,RISCV,581,"This code snippet appears to be a part of a function that is handling an error condition. It is difficult to predict the exact next statement without knowing the context of the code and the possible inputs that could be passed to the function. However, based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the function is trying to extract the location of an error in the input data and then return an error message. The first line of the code snippet defines a variable `ErrorLoc` as the start location of an error in the input data. The next line returns an error message with the location of the error. The final line returns `" LLVM,RISCV,582,"The next statement of this code snippet is: Op -> SpecialCapReg . Data = Str . data ( ) ; This statement assigns the value of the `data` field of the `Str` object to the `Data` field of the `SpecialCapReg` object." LLVM,RISCV,583,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the functions and classes used in the snippet. However, based on the names of the functions and variables, it appears that the code is generating machine code for a computer processor. The `emitLabel` function is likely used to emit a label for a memory location, and the `SymbolHi` variable is likely a symbolic representation of a memory location. The `MCExpr` class is likely used to represent a mathematical expression, and the `create` function is likely used to create a new instance of" LLVM,RISCV,584,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `MCExpr` class and the `MCSymbolRefExpr` class. However, based on the syntax and the context in which the code is being used, it is likely that the next statement will be a call to the `create` method of the `MCExpr` class, passing in the `TmpLabel` symbol and the `Ctx` context as arguments. The `create` method is used to create a new `MCExpr` object, and it is typically called with" LLVM,RISCV,585,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be the call to the `emitAuipccInstPair` function, which is used to emit an AUIPC instruction pair for the given destination register, symbol, and opcode. The function takes several arguments, including the destination register, the symbol, the opcode, and the location of the instruction. The function will then emit the appropriate instructions to the output stream." LLVM,RISCV,586,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be a comparison of the `SecondOpcode` variable with a specific value, depending on the value of the `isRV64()` function. In the first branch of the ternary operator, the `SecondOpcode` variable is assigned the value of the first string literal. In the second branch, the `SecondOpcode` variable is assigned the value of the second string literal. Therefore, the next statement of this code snippet is likely to be a comparison of the `SecondOpcode` variable with a specific value, such as:" LLVM,RISCV,587,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet without knowing the context and the specific implementation of the `Inst` class. However, based on the syntax and the name of the variables, it appears that the code is trying to retrieve the symbolic expression of an operand of an instruction. The `Inst` class is likely a class that represents an instruction in a computer program, and the `getOperand` method is likely a method that returns the operand of the instruction at a specific index. The `` placeholder is likely a placeholder for a numerical literal, which is a value" LLVM,RISCV,588,"The next statement of this code snippet is: emitAuipccInstPair(DestReg, DestReg, Symbol, MCExpr::VK__PCREL_LO, , IDLoc, Out);" LLVM,RISCV,589,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `emitAuipccInstPair(DestReg, DestReg, Symbol, MCExpr::VK__TLS_GD_CAPTAB_PCREL_HI, , IDLoc, Out);` This statement is calling the `emitAuipccInstPair` function, which is a member function of the `MCInst` class. The function takes several parameters, including `DestReg`, `Symbol`, and `MCExpr::VK_MCExpr :: VK__TLS_IE_CAPTAB_PCREL_HI , SecondOpcode , IDLoc , Out ) ; This statement is calling the function emitAuipccInstPair with the following arguments: * DestReg: The destination register for the instruction. * TmpReg: The temporary register for the instruction. * Symbol: The symbol" LLVM,RISCV,593,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the `getCheriCapabilitySize` method is not specified. However, based on the name of the method and the fact that it is marked as `const`, it is likely that the method returns a value of type `unsigned` that represents the size of a Cheri capability." LLVM,RISCV,594,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return AsmParser::classifySymbolRef(getImm(), VK) && VK == MCExpr::VK_CCALL;` This statement is a return statement that returns the result of the `classifySymbolRef` method of the `AsmParser` class, which is called on the result of the `getImm` method, and the `VK` variable is compared to the `VK_CCALL` constant of the `MCExpr` class." LLVM,RISCV,595,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the code depends on the specific values of the variables and the implementation of the functions being called. However, based on the information provided, it is likely that the next statement after the `int64_t Imm` declaration will be a call to the `isCCallSymbol` function, as this is the only function that is defined in the code snippet and has a return type of `bool`. Therefore, the next statement of this code snippet is likely to be: ``` return is" LLVM,RISCV,596,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return getSTI().getFeatureBits();` This statement is calling the `getFeatureBits()` method on the result of the `getSTI()` method, passing in the string literal `` as an argument. The `getFeatureBits()` method is expected to return a bit vector representing the features of the string." LLVM,RISCV,597,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `KindTy` class and the `MCRegisterClasses` class, as well as the values of the `Kind` variable and the `ISA_LIT` and `STR_LIT` literals. However, based on the syntax and the context of the code, it is likely that the next statement will be a conditional statement that checks whether the `Kind` variable is equal to the `KindTy::Register` value, and if so, it will check whether the `Reg" LLVM,RISCV,598,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return false;` Explanation: The `isPseudoCJumpSymbol` function is checking if the current symbol is a pseudo-call jump symbol. It does this by checking if the symbol is an immediate value (using the `isImm` function) and if the immediate value can be evaluated to a constant (using the `evaluateConstantImm` function). If the symbol is not an immediate value or if the immediate value cannot be evaluated to a constant, the function returns `false`. If the symbol is" LLVM,RISCV,599,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the `isSpecialCapRegister` function depends on the value of the `Kind` member variable, which is not specified in the code snippet. However, based on the name of the function and the fact that it returns a `bool` value, it is likely that the function is used to determine whether a given register is a special capability register. In this case, the next statement of the code snippet would likely be a check of the `Kind` member variable to determine whether it is equal to the value of" LLVM,RISCV,600,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `KindTy` class and the value of the `Kind` variable. However, based on the syntax and the context, it is likely that the next statement will be a comparison or a logical operation that evaluates to a boolean value." LLVM,RISCV,601,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of the code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `isTPRelCIncOffsetSymbol` function and the values of the variables used in the function. However, based on the name of the function and the fact that it is a member function of a class, it is likely that the function is used to determine whether a given symbol is a TP-relative symbol with an incremental offset. If this is the case, then the next statement of the code snippet is likely to be a comparison of the `Imm` variable with" LLVM,RISCV,602,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet without knowing the context and the purpose of the code. However, based on the syntax and the variables used, it appears to be a part of a function that is checking if a given value is a constant immediate value and if it is shifted by a certain amount. The function is also checking if the value is of a specific type () and if it has a specific value (MCExpr :: VK__None). Without more information," LLVM,RISCV,603,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the code depends on the specific values of the variables and the implementation of the functions being called. However, based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the code is initializing a variable `Imm` of type `int64_t` and a variable `VK` of type `MCExpr::VariantKind`. The value of `VK` is being set to `MCExpr::VK_None`, which suggests that the code is initializing a variant kind to a default value." LLVM,RISCV,604,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return IsConstantImm && isUInt < > ( Imm ) && VK == MCExpr :: VK__None ;` This statement is a return statement that returns a boolean value indicating whether the expression is a constant immediate value and has the correct variant kind. The `IsConstantImm` variable is set to `true` if the expression is a constant immediate value, and the `isUInt < ). If the value is less than that number, it is checking if the value is a valid immediate value for a specific instruction set architecture (ISA) (). If all of" LLVM,RISCV,606,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of the code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `isImm` function and the `MCExpr` class. However, based on the syntax and the context of the code, it is likely that the next statement will be a call to the `MCExpr` constructor, which will create a new instance of the `MCExpr` class. The `MCExpr` constructor is likely to take a `VariantKind` parameter, which is the type of the expression being constructed. The `VariantKind` parameter is likely to be one" LLVM,RISCV,607,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `IsValid = AsmParser::classifySymbolRef(getImm(), VK);` This statement is executed if `IsConstantImm` is false, which means that the immediate value is not a constant expression. The `classifySymbolRef` function is called to determine the type of the symbol reference, which is stored in `VK`. The function returns a boolean value indicating whether the symbol reference is valid or not. If the symbol reference is valid, the `IsValid` variable is set to true, otherwise it is set to false" LLVM,RISCV,608,"The next statement of the code snippet is: `return isUInt < > ( Imm ) && ( VK == MCExpr :: VK__None || VK == MCExpr :: VK__PCREL_HI || VK == MCExpr :: VK__GOT_HI || VK == MCExpr" LLVM,RISCV,609,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the context in which the code is being executed. However, based on the information provided, it is likely that the next statement will be a declaration of a variable of type `int64_t` with the name `Imm`." LLVM,RISCV,610,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be: `if (IsConstantImm) {` This is because the `evaluateConstantImm` function is called with the `getImm` function as an argument, and the return value of `evaluateConstantImm` is stored in the `IsConstantImm` variable. If the `evaluateConstantImm` function returns a non-zero value, then the `IsConstantImm` variable will be set to `true`, and the code inside the `if` block will be executed" LLVM,RISCV,611,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be the `return` statement at the end of the `if` block, which returns a value of type `MatchOperand` to indicate the result of the match." LLVM,RISCV,612,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be: `Res = MCExpr :: create ( Res , Kind , getContext ( ) ) ;` This statement creates a new `MCExpr` object with the given `Res` and `Kind` values, and returns it as the result of the `MatchOperand` function. The `Kind` value is determined by the `IsCap` flag and the `Identifier` string, and is used to create a symbolic expression that represents a call or a jump instruction." LLVM,RISCV,613,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it appears to be a fragment of a larger function and the context is not provided. However, based on the code provided, it is possible that the next statement could be: `getTargetStreamer().emitDirectiveOptionRVC( );` This is because the previous `if` statement checks if `Option` is equal to ``, and if it is, it calls `getTargetStreamer().emitDirectiveOptionNoRVC()`. If `Option` is not equal to `: This is a case statement that checks if the current instruction is a load or store instruction that accesses a TLS (Thread-Local Storage) symbol. If it is, it calls the `emitLoadStoreSymbol` function to emit the necessary code to load or store the symbol. The function takes the current instruction, the symbol name, the ID of the local variable or parameter that the symbol is stored in, and the output stream as arguments. The `emitLoadStoreSymbol` function returns `false` if the symbol is not a" LLVM,RISCV,622,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return isUInt < > ( Imm ) && ( VK == MCExpr :: VK__None || VK == MCExpr :: VK__PCREL_HI || VK == MCExpr :: VK__GOT_HI ) ;` This statement is executed if the `Is" LLVM,RISCV,623,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `IsValid = AsmParser :: classifySymbolRef ( getImm ( ) , VK , Imm ) ;` This statement is classifying the symbol reference of the immediate value `getImm()` using the `classifySymbolRef()` method of the `AsmParser` class. The method takes three arguments: the immediate value, the variable kind `VK`, and the `Imm` variable. The return value of the method is assigned to `IsValid`." LLVM,RISCV,624,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `emitLoadImm(Reg, Imm, Out);`" LLVM,RISCV,625,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `emitToStreamer(Out, MCInstBuilder().addReg(Reg).addReg().addExpr(Op1.getExpr()));` This statement is calling the `emitToStreamer` function, passing in the `Out` variable, and a `MCInstBuilder` object that is being constructed with the `` string literal. The `MCInstBuilder` object is being initialized with the `Reg` variable, and then the `addReg` and `" LLVM,RISCV,626,"Based on the code snippet you provided, it seems that the next statement after the `switch` statement would be a `case` statement. Specifically, the next `case` statement would be `Match_InvalidUImm9Lsb000`. However, without more context, it's difficult to say for certain what the next statement would be. The `switch` statement is part of a larger function or method, and the next statement would depend on the control flow of that function or method." LLVM,RISCV,627,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `assert ( N == && ) ;` This statement is an assertion that checks whether the value of `N` is equal to `` and whether the value of `` is non-empty. If either of these conditions is not met, the assertion will fail and an error message will be displayed." LLVM,RISCV,628,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the code depends on the values of the variables and the specific implementation of the `Op` class. However, based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the next statement after the `return Op` statement would be the end of the function or method that contains this code." LLVM,RISCV,629,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `Op->Vtypei.Sew = static_cast(sew.logBase2());` This statement assigns the value of `sew.logBase2()` to the `Sew` field of the `Vtypei` struct within the `Op` object. The `static_cast` is used to convert the result of `logBase2()` to the `VSEW` type, which is the type of the `Sew` field." LLVM,RISCV,630,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific values of the string literals and the context in which the code is being executed. However, based on the syntax and structure of the code, it appears that the code is defining a `switch` statement with multiple `case` labels, each of which returns a different string literal. Therefore, the next statement of this code snippet is likely to be the next `case` label or the `default` label, depending on the value of the string literal that is being evaluated." LLVM,RISCV,631,"Based on the code snippet you provided, it seems like the next statement would be: `case : return ;` This is because the `switch` statement is checking the value of `lmul` against a series of string literals, and if it matches one of them, it will return the corresponding string literal. The next `case` statement after the one that matches `lmul` will be executed." LLVM,RISCV,632,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific values of the string literals and the input to the function. However, based on the pattern of the code, it is likely that the next statement will be another `case` statement with a different string literal, followed by a `return` statement with a different string literal." LLVM,RISCV,633,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `Kind` and `VTypeImm` types, as well as the value of the `Kind` variable. However, based on the syntax and the context of the code, it is likely that the next statement will be an assignment to a variable or a function call that uses the `vtypei` object." LLVM,RISCV,634,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific values of the variables and the behavior of the functions being called. However, based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the next statement will be a call to the `concat` method of the `vtypei` object, passing in a `Twine` object containing the string literal ``." LLVM,RISCV,635,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return false;` This is because the `if` statement checks if `isImm()` returns `false`, and if it does, the function returns `false`." LLVM,RISCV,636,"The next statement of this code snippet is: return Kind == KindTy::VectorRegister;" LLVM,RISCV,637,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the program depends on the values of the variables and the specific implementation of the `Kind` and `VTypeImm` types. However, based on the syntax and the context of the code snippet, it is likely that the next statement will be a comparison or assignment operation involving the `Kind` and `VTypeImm` variables." LLVM,RISCV,638,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `if (Result == MatchOperand_Success) return false;` This statement checks the result of the `MatchOperandParserImpl` function, which was called earlier in the code snippet. If the result is `MatchOperand_Success`, the function returns `false`. If the result is not `MatchOperand_Success`, the function continues to the next statement." LLVM,RISCV,639,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `if (Result == MatchOperand_Success) return false;` This statement checks the result of the `MatchOperandParserImpl` function, which was called earlier in the code snippet. If the result is `MatchOperand_Success`, the function returns `false`. If the result is not `MatchOperand_Success`, the function continues to the next statement." LLVM,RISCV,640,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `RegNo = ;` This is because the `matchRegisterNameHelper` function is called with the `RegNo` variable as an argument, and the function modifies the value of `RegNo` based on the input string. If the input string is a valid register name, the function sets `RegNo` to the corresponding register number. If the input string is not a valid register name, the function sets `RegNo` to ``, which is a special value that indicates an error." LLVM,RISCV,641,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the implementation of the `getLexer()` and `MatchRegisterName()` functions, as well as the input data. However, based on the names of the functions and the variables used, it is likely that the next statement will be a call to `getLexer()` to retrieve the next token from the input data, and then a call to `MatchRegisterName()` to match the token with a register name." LLVM,RISCV,642,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `StringRef Name = getLexer().getTok().getIdentifier();`" LLVM,RISCV,643,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `getLexer().Lex(); if (getLexer().is(AsmToken::EndOfStatement)) { Operands.push_back(Operand::createVTypeImm(sew, lmul, ediv, S, isRV64())); return MatchOperand_Success; }`. This statement is checking if the current token is an end-of-statement token, and if so, it creates a new `Operand` object and adds it to the `Operands" LLVM,RISCV,644,The next statement after `OS << ;` is `OS << getReg ( ) << ;`. LLVM,RISCV,645,"The next statement in this code snippet is: `case KindTy::VTypeImm: SmallVector> VTypeBuf;` This is a case statement in a switch block, where the case is checking for the value of the `KindTy` enumeration to be `VTypeImm`. If the value matches, the code inside the case statement is executed. In this case, the code creates a `SmallVector` object named `VTypeBuf` with a size of `` and a type of `char`." LLVM,RISCV,646,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `Kind = o.Kind;` This statement assigns the value of `o.Kind` to the `Kind` variable." LLVM,RISCV,647,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty because it depends on the value of the `Kind` variable, which is not specified in the code snippet. However, based on the `switch` statement, it is likely that the next statement will be one of the following: * `Reg = o . Reg ;` if `Kind` is equal to `KindTy :: Register` * `Imm = o . Imm ;` if `Kind` is equal to `KindTy :: Immediate` * `Tok = o . Tok ;` if `" LLVM,RISCV,648,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the program depends on the specific values of the variables and the implementation of the `Op` class. However, based on the code snippet provided, it is likely that the next statement will be: `Op -> Imm . Val = Val ;` This statement assigns the value of `Val` to the `Val` field of the `Imm` object, which is a member of the `Op` class." LLVM,RISCV,649,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `Operands.push_back(Operand::createImm(Res, S, E));` This statement adds a new operand to the `Operands` vector, which is a vector of `Operand` objects. The new operand is created using the `createImm` method of the `Operand` class, which takes three arguments: the first is the result of the previous operation, the second is the symbolic representation of the operand, and the third is the encoding of the operand" LLVM,RISCV,650,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `if (VK == MCExpr::VK_None) {` This is because the `getVariantKindForName` function returns a value of type `MCExpr::VariantKind`, and the `VK_None` value is a possible return value of this function. The code checks if the returned value is equal to `VK_None`, and if so, it enters the `if` block." LLVM,RISCV,651,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific input and the behavior of the `Lex` and `createToken` functions. However, based on the code snippet, it appears that the next statement will be: `Operands.push_back(Operand::createToken(, getLoc()));` This is because the `if` statement that precedes this line checks whether `HadParens` is true, and if it is, it pushes a new operand onto the `Operands` vector" LLVM,RISCV,652,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `RegNo = MatchRegisterAltName(Name);`" LLVM,RISCV,653,"Based on the code snippet provided, it seems that the next statement will be: `case Match_InvalidVTypeI: { SMLoc ErrorLoc = ( ( Operand & ) * Operands [ ErrorInfo ] ) . getStartLoc ( ) ; return Error ( ErrorLoc , ) ; }` This is because the code snippet is checking for various types of errors in the input assembly code, and the `Match_InvalidVTypeI` case is checking for an invalid VTypeI instruction. The `" LLVM,RISCV,654,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific values of the string literals and the return values of the functions. However, based on the syntax and structure of the code, it appears that the next statement will be a `case` statement, possibly with a string literal as the condition." LLVM,RISCV,655,"The next statement after the code snippet you provided is: `return IsConstantImm && IsInRange && VK == MCExpr :: VK__None;` This statement is a return statement that returns a boolean value indicating whether the given immediate value is a constant immediate value, and whether it is in the range of the specified ISA. The `IsConstantImm` variable is set to `true` if the immediate value is a constant immediate value, and the `IsInRange` variable is set to `true" LLVM,RISCV,656,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `if (VK == MCExpr::VK__LO || VK == MCExpr::VK__PCREL_LO) return true;` This statement checks if the value of `VK` is equal to either `MCExpr::VK__LO` or `MCExpr::VK_" LLVM,RISCV,657,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet without knowing the context and the purpose of the function. However, based on the function name and the parameters, it appears that the function is checking if the register name matches the register number. The function takes three parameters: * `IsRV32E`: a boolean value indicating whether the register is 32-bit or 64-bit. * `RegNo`: a reference to a register number. * `Name`: a string reference to the register name. The function appears to be checking if the register name" LLVM,RISCV,658,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return RegNo == ;` This statement is the last statement in the code snippet, and it returns the value of `RegNo` as a boolean value, indicating whether `RegNo` is equal to ``." LLVM,RISCV,659,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it appears to be part of a larger program and the context is not provided. However, based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the next statement will be a call to the `matchRegisterNameHelper` function, passing in the `RegNo` variable as an argument. The function will then check if the `RegNo` is equal to a specific value, and if so, will return a value indicating that there was no match. If the `RegNo` is not equal to the specific value, the function will continue to execute" LLVM,RISCV,660,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be: `if (IsRegFPR32) { ... }` This is because the previous statement `bool IsRegFPR32 = MCRegisterClasses[].contains(Reg);` is checking if the register `Reg` is a member of the register class `MCRegisterClasses[]`, which is a set of registers that are 32-bit floating-point registers. If `Reg` is a member of this" LLVM,RISCV,661,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `Op.Reg.RegNum = convertFPR32ToFPR64(Reg);` This statement is executed if the `IsRegFPR32` and `IsRegFPR32C` variables are both true, and the `Kind` variable is equal to `MCK_FPR64` or `MCK_FPR64C`. The `convertFPR32ToFPR64` function is called with the `Reg` variable as an argument, and the result is assigned to the `Reg" LLVM,RISCV,662,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `MatchOperand` function and the input data. However, based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the next statement will be a call to the `getLexer` function to retrieve the current lexer object. The `getLexer` function will then be called on the lexer object to retrieve the current token, which will be compared to the `AsmToken::Identifier` token. If the current token is not an identifier, the `MatchOperand` function will" LLVM,RISCV,663,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be: `Res = MCSymbolRefExpr::create(Sym, MCSymbolRefExpr::VK_None, getContext());` This statement creates a new `MCSymbolRefExpr` object with the given symbol `Sym` and variant kind `VK_None`, and returns it as the result of the function. The `getContext()` function is used to get the current context, which is needed to create the `MCSymbolRefExpr` object." LLVM,RISCV,664,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `Operands.push_back(Operand::createReg(RegNo, S, E, isRV64()));` This statement is adding a new operand to the `Operands` vector, which is a vector of `Operand` objects. The `createReg` method is being called to create a new `Operand` object, which is then being added to the `Operands` vector. The `createReg` method takes several arguments, including the register number (`RegNo`), the start" LLVM,RISCV,665,"Based on the code snippet provided, it appears to be a part of a function that is parsing a register name from a string. The function is using a helper function `matchRegisterNameHelper` to match the register name, and then it is creating a new operand using the `createReg` function if the register name is valid. The next statement of the code snippet is: ``` if ( HadParens ) { getParser ( ) . Lex ( ) ; Operands . push_back ( Operand :: createToken ( `, ``, and ``, which suggest that the snippet may be a template or a stub that needs to be filled in with specific values or code." LLVM,RISCV,669,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `Operands.push_back(Operand::createImm(Res, S, E, isRV64()));` This statement is pushing a new operand onto the `Operands` vector, where the operand is created using the `Operand::createImm` method. The operand is created with the `Res` value, which is a symbol reference expression, and the `S`, `E`, and `isRV64()` values, which are used to specify the operand's properties." LLVM,RISCV,670,"Based on the code snippet provided, it is difficult to predict the next statement with certainty. However, based on the pattern of the code, it is likely that the next statement will be another case statement with a similar structure to the ones already provided. The code appears to be part of a switch statement that is handling different cases based on the value of a string literal. Each case statement is calling a function named `emitLoadStoreSymbol` with a set of arguments that include the string literal, and the function is returning a value that is being used to determine whether the switch statement should continue to the next case or exit" LLVM,RISCV,671,"The next statement of the code snippet is: Op->VType.Lmul = static_cast(Flmul);" LLVM,RISCV,672,"The next statement of this code snippet is: return generateImmOutOfRangeError ( Operands , ErrorInfo , , ( << ) - , ) ; This statement is called for each case in the switch statement, and it generates an error message indicating that the immediate value is out of range. The error message includes the operand number, the expected range of values, and a string literal describing the error." LLVM,RISCV,673,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return IsConstantImm && isUInt < > ( Imm ) && VK == MCExpr :: VK__None;` This statement is a return statement that returns a boolean value indicating whether the current instruction is a constant immediate value and whether the immediate value is a valid unsigned integer of the specified size () and whether the value kind (VK) is equal to the expected value kind ( > ( Imm ) && VK == MCExpr :: VK__None ;` This statement is a return statement that returns a boolean value indicating whether the expression is a constant immediate value and whether the value is unsigned and fits in the specified number of bits. The `IsConstantImm` variable is set to `true` if the expression is a constant immediate value, and the `is" LLVM,RISCV,676,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be a switch statement that checks the value of `VK` and performs different actions based on its value. The possible values of `VK` are: * `VK_None`: This is the default value, and it indicates that there is no variant kind. * `VK_Variant`: This value indicates that the expression is a variant expression. * `VK_Variant_None`: This value indicates that the expression is a variant expression, but it does not have a specific variant kind. The switch statement will likely look" LLVM,RISCV,677,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return IsValid && VK == MCExpr :: VK__None;` This statement is the final return statement of the function, and it returns a boolean value indicating whether the expression is valid and has no shifted unsigned integer operands. The `IsValid` variable is set to `true` if the expression is valid and has no shifted unsigned integer operands, and `false` otherwise. The `VK` variable is set to the value of the `MCExpr::" LLVM,RISCV,678,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `IsValid = isShiftedUInt(Imm);` This is because the code checks if `IsConstantImm` is true, and if it is, it sets `IsValid` to the result of `isShiftedUInt(Imm)`. If `IsConstantImm` is false, it sets `IsValid` to the result of `AsmParser::classifySymbolRef(getImm(), VK, Im" LLVM,RISCV,679,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `Imm = getImm(); // Get the immediate value`" LLVM,RISCV,680,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `if (IsConstantImm) {` This is because the `evaluateConstantImm` function returns a boolean value indicating whether the immediate value is a constant expression. If the immediate value is a constant expression, the `IsConstantImm` variable will be set to `true`, and the code inside the `if` block will be executed." LLVM,RISCV,681,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of the code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `isImm` and `evaluateConstantImm` functions, as well as the values of the `Imm` and `VK` variables. However, based on the code snippet provided, it is likely that the next statement will be: ``` if (IsConstantImm) { IsValid = true; } else { IsValid = false; } ``` This is because the `evaluateConstantImm`" LLVM,RISCV,682,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be: `if (getLexer().isNot(AsmToken::LParen)) {` This is because the `parseMemOpBaseReg` function is checking if the current token is not a left parenthesis (`AsmToken::LParen`). If it is not, then it will enter the `if` block and call the `Error` function with a specific error message." LLVM,RISCV,683,"Based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the next statement will be: `if (getSTI().getFeatureBits()[]) {` This is because the previous `if` statement has an `else` clause that is executed if the result of `MatchOperandParserImpl` is not `MatchOperand_Success`. If the result is not `MatchOperand_Success`, then the next statement to be executed is the `else` clause, which is the `if` statement with the condition `getSTI().getFeatureBits()[" LLVM,RISCV,684,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be the evaluation of the `isImm` function with the two numeric literals as arguments. The `isImm` function is not defined in the code snippet provided, so it is not possible to determine its exact behavior. However, based on the name of the function and the fact that it is being called with two numeric literals as arguments, it is likely that the function is used to determine whether a given number is an immediate value (i.e., a value that can be stored directly in a register). Therefore, the next statement of" LLVM,RISCV,685,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the `isU32Imm` function is not specified. However, based on the name of the function, it is likely that it returns a boolean value indicating whether the given value is a 32-bit unsigned integer. Therefore, the next statement of this code snippet could be any statement that uses the result of the `isU32Imm` function, such as an `if` statement or a `while` loop." LLVM,RISCV,686,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the `isU32Imm` function is not specified. However, based on the name of the function, it is likely that it returns a boolean value indicating whether the given value is a 32-bit unsigned integer. Therefore, the next statement of this code snippet could be any statement that uses the result of the `isU32Imm` function, such as an `if` statement or a `while` loop." LLVM,RISCV,687,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the `isU32Imm` function is not specified. However, based on the name of the function, it is likely that it returns a boolean value indicating whether the given value is a 32-bit unsigned integer. Therefore, the next statement of this code snippet could be any statement that uses the result of the `isU32Imm` function, such as an `if` statement or a `while` loop." LLVM,RISCV,688,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be: `if (IsConstantImm) { ... }` This is because the `evaluateConstantImm` function is called with the `getImm` function as an argument, and the `IsConstantImm` variable is set to the result of this function call. If the `IsConstantImm` variable is true, then the `if` statement will be executed." LLVM,RISCV,689,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be: `getParser().Lex();` This is because the code snippet ends with a call to `getLexer().isNot(AsmToken::RParen)`, which checks if the current token is not a right parenthesis. If the token is not a right parenthesis, the code will return `MatchOperand_ParseFail`. Therefore, the next statement is likely to be a call to `getParser().Lex()` to advance the parser to the next token." LLVM,RISCV,690,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be a `return` statement, as the code is checking various conditions and returning a boolean value indicating whether the expression is a constant integer with a specific value. The code is checking if the expression is a constant integer by calling the `evaluateConstantImm` function, which returns a boolean value indicating whether the expression is a constant integer. If the expression is not a constant integer, the function returns `false`. The code is also checking if the expression is an integer with a specific value by calling the `isInt` function, which returns a boolean" LLVM,RISCV,691,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific values of the variables and the implementation of the `IsConstantImm` and `isInt` functions. However, based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the next statement will be a comparison of the `VK` variable with the `MCExpr::VK__None` constant. If the comparison evaluates to true, the code will return `true`. If the comparison evaluates to false, the code will return `false`." LLVM,RISCV,692,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific values of the variables and the implementation of the `IsConstantImm` and `isInt` functions. However, based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the next statement will be a comparison of the `VK` variable with the `MCExpr::VK__None` constant. If the comparison evaluates to true, the code will return `true`. If the comparison evaluates to false, the code will return `false`." LLVM,RISCV,693,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the code depends on the specific values of the variables and the implementation of the functions being called. However, based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the next statement will be an assignment to the `Imm` variable, using the value of the `VK` variable as the right-hand side of the assignment. The `VK` variable is of type `ISA_LIT`, which suggests that it is a literal value that represents a specific instruction or operation in the target instruction set architecture (" LLVM,RISCV,694,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `MCExpr` class and the value of the `VK` variable. However, based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the `MCExpr` class has a method called `getVariantKind` that returns a value of type `VariantKind`. The `VariantKind` enum is not defined in the code snippet, but it is likely that it has values such as `Imm8`, `Imm16`, `Imm32`, etc. There" LLVM,RISCV,695,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be: `Op->setSew(Sew);` This is because the `createVType` function is creating a new `Operand` object and setting its `Sew` field to the value of the `Sew` parameter. The `KindTy` enum is used to specify the type of the `Operand` object, and the `IsRV64` parameter is used to determine whether the operand is a 64-bit or 32-bit value." LLVM,RISCV,696,The next statement in this code snippet is `case : return ;`. LLVM,RISCV,697,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific values of the string literals and the context in which the code is being executed. However, based on the syntax and structure of the code, it appears to be a `switch` statement that is checking the value of a string variable and returning a different string based on the value. Without more information, it is not possible to determine the exact next statement that will be executed. However, some possible next statements that could be executed include: * `return ;` *" LLVM,RISCV,698,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific values of the string literals and the context in which the code is being executed. However, based on the syntax and structure of the code, it appears to be a `switch` statement with multiple `case` labels, each of which returns a different string literal. Therefore, the next statement of this code snippet is likely to be another `case` label, followed by a return statement that returns a string literal." LLVM,RISCV,699,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `if (Lmul != && Lmul != && Lmul != && Lmul != ) return MatchOperand_NoMatch;` This statement checks if the value of `Lmul` is not equal to any of the four possible values: ``, ``, ``, and ``. If it is not equal to any of these values, the function" LLVM,RISCV,700,"The next statement of the code snippet is: if ( TargetFlags == ) { The code is checking if the TargetFlags variable is equal to a specific string literal, which is not provided in the code snippet. If the condition is true, the code will execute the block of code inside the if statement." LLVM,RISCV,701,"Based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the next statement will be: `if ( TargetFlags == ) {` This is because the previous `if` statement has an `else` clause that checks if `TargetFlags` is equal to ``. If this condition is true, then the code inside the `else` clause will be executed, which includes the statement `if ( TargetFlags == ) {`." LLVM,RISCV,702,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return IsConstantImm && isUInt < > ( Imm ) && VK == MCExpr :: VK__None ;` This statement is a return statement that returns a boolean value indicating whether the expression is a constant immediate value and whether the value is unsigned and fits in the specified number of bits. The `IsConstantImm` variable is set to `true` if the expression is a constant immediate value, and the `is" LLVM,RISCV,703,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the `evaluateConstantImm` function is not specified. However, based on the name of the function and the arguments it takes, it is likely that it will evaluate the constant immediate value and return a boolean indicating whether the value is constant. Therefore, the next statement of this code snippet is likely to be the return statement, which will return the result of the `evaluateConstantImm` function." LLVM,RISCV,704,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return IsValid && VK == MCExpr :: VK__None;` This statement returns a boolean value indicating whether the expression is valid and whether the value kind is `MCExpr::VK__None`. The `IsValid` variable is set to `true` if the expression is a constant immediate or a valid symbol reference, and `false` otherwise. The `VK` variable is set to the value kind of the expression." LLVM,RISCV,705,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific values of the variables and the behavior of the functions being called. However, based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the next statement will be: `return IsValid && VK == MCExpr :: VK__None ;` This statement will return a boolean value indicating whether the expression is valid and whether the value kind is none. The `IsValid` variable is set to the result of the `isUInt" LLVM,RISCV,706,"Based on the code snippet provided, it is difficult to predict the next statement with certainty. However, based on the context and the patterns in the code, it is likely that the next statement will be a call to the `parseRegister` method, which is not shown in the code snippet. The `parseRegister` method is likely to be defined in the same class as the `parseMemOpBaseReg` method, and it is likely to take the `Operands` vector as an argument, just like `parseMemOpBaseReg`. The `parseRegister` method is also likely to return a value of" LLVM,RISCV,707,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `if (getSTI().getFeatureBits()[]) {` This is because the previous `if` statement has two branches: one for `MatchOperand_Success` and one for `MatchOperand_ParseFail`. If the result is `MatchOperand_Success`, the function returns `false`. If the result is `MatchOperand_ParseFail`, the function returns `true`. Therefore, if the result is not `MatchOperand_Success` or `MatchOperand_Parse" LLVM,RISCV,708,"The next statement after the `if` statement would be the `else` statement, which would execute if `IsConstant` is false. Inside the `else` statement, the code would call the `createExpr` method of the `MCOperand` class, passing in the `Expr` object as an argument. This would create a new `MCOperand` object that represents the expression `Expr`. Therefore, the next statement after the `if` statement would be: ``` Inst.addOperand(MCOperand::createExpr(Expr)); ```" LLVM,RISCV,709,"Based on the code snippet you provided, it appears that the next statement will be: `case 'i': Imm |= ;` This is because the `switch` statement is checking the value of the variable `c`, which is a `char` obtained from the `getName()` method of an object `SE`. The `switch` statement is checking the value of `c` against the characters `'i'`, `'o'`, and `'r'`, and if it matches any of those characters, it will execute the corresponding code block. In this case, the" LLVM,RISCV,710,"The next statement after the `default` case is `llvm_unreachable()` which is a function call to the `llvm_unreachable` function with a string literal argument. This function is used to indicate that the code should not be reached, and is typically used in situations where the compiler can prove that a certain branch of code is not reachable. In this case, the `default` case is used to handle any characters that are not 'i', 'o', or 'r'. If any of these characters are encountered, the `llvm" LLVM,RISCV,711,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `Kind = RE->getKind();` Explanation: The code snippet is a part of a function that takes an `Expr` parameter and checks if it is a valid expression for a relocation. The function first checks if `Expr` is a `MCConstantExpr` or a `MCSymbolRefExpr`, and if it is, it returns `true`. If `Expr` is not a `MCConstantExpr` or a `MCSymbolRefExpr`, the function checks if it is a `MCBinaryExpr` and if" LLVM,RISCV,712,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the program depends on the input data and the specific implementation of the `createImm` function. However, based on the name of the function and the parameters it takes, it appears that this function is responsible for creating an immutable operand for an instruction. The `Val` parameter is likely a pointer to an expression that represents the value of the operand, and the `S` and `E` parameters are likely the start and end locations of the operand in the instruction. The `IsRV" LLVM,RISCV,713,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the program depends on the specific values of the variables and the implementation of the `make_unique` and `Operand` classes. However, based on the code snippet provided, it is likely that the next statement will be an assignment to the `Reg` field of the `Op` object, as the previous statement sets the `RegNum` field of the `Op` object to the value of the `RegNo` variable. Here is a possible next statement: ``` Op->Reg =" LLVM,RISCV,714,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be: `return std::move(Op);` This is because the code is creating a unique pointer to an `Operand` object, and the `createSysReg` function is expected to return a unique pointer to an `Operand` object. The `std::move` function is used to move the ownership of the unique pointer to the caller of the function, which is the expected behavior for a factory function like `createSysReg`." LLVM,RISCV,715,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `make_unique` function and the `Operand` class. However, based on the code snippet you provided, it appears that the next statement will likely be a call to the `make_unique` function to create a new instance of the `Operand` class, passing in the `Token` object as an argument. The `make_unique` function is a C++14 feature that allows you to create a unique pointer to an object, which is a pointer that is guaranteed" LLVM,RISCV,716,"The next statement after the `else` clause is: `emitToStreamer(Out, MCInstBuilder(Inst.Opc).addReg(DestReg).addReg(SrcReg).addImm(Inst.Imm));` This statement is similar to the one in the `if` clause, but with a different opcode (`Inst.Opc` instead of ``). It also adds the destination and source registers (`DestReg` and `SrcReg`, respectively) and the immediate value (`Inst.Imm`) to the instruction builder." LLVM,RISCV,717,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific values of the variables and the behavior of the functions being called. However, based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the next statement will be a call to the `emitToStreamer` function with the `Out` object as the first argument, and a `MCInstBuilder` object as the second argument. The `MCInstBuilder` object will have been constructed with the `DestReg` operand and the `Symbol` expression as its operands." LLVM,RISCV,718,"The next statement after the given code snippet is: S.EmitInstruction((Res ? CInst : Inst), getSTI());" LLVM,RISCV,719,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `compressInst` function and the `CInst` and `Inst` objects. However, based on the names of the functions and objects, it is likely that the next statement will be related to the compression of instructions. Here are a few possibilities: 1. The next statement could be a call to a function that updates the compression state of the `CInst` object based on the result of the `compressInst` function. 2. The next statement could be a" LLVM,RISCV,720,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `Kind` and `Imm` variables, as well as the context in which this code is being executed. However, based on the syntax and the fact that the `Kind` variable is being compared to the `Immediate` value, it is likely that the next statement will be a conditional statement that checks whether the `Kind` is equal to `Immediate` and the `STR_LIT` value is true. If this is the case, the next statement will likely be a return statement" LLVM,RISCV,721,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the code depends on the specific values of the variables and the implementation of the `getReg()` function. However, based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the `getReg()` function is intended to return the register number associated with the current instruction. The function first checks that the instruction is a register instruction (i.e., `Kind == Register`) and that the register number is valid (i.e., ``). If these conditions are met, the function returns the register number" LLVM,RISCV,722,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return StringRef(SysReg.Data, SysReg.Length);` This statement returns a `StringRef` object that represents the system register name. The `StringRef` constructor takes two arguments: the first is a pointer to the first character of the string, and the second is the length of the string. In this case, the first argument is `SysReg.Data`, which is a pointer to the first character of the system register name, and the second argument is `SysReg.Length`, which is the length of the system" LLVM,RISCV,723,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the `getToken` method depends on the implementation of the `StringRef` class and the specific input data. However, based on the name of the method and the return type, it is likely that the method returns a reference to a string token extracted from the input data." LLVM,RISCV,724,"The next statement after the `if` statement in the code snippet you provided is: `IsValid = AsmParser :: classifySymbolRef ( getImm ( ) , VK , Imm ) ;` This statement assigns the result of the `classifySymbolRef` method to the `IsValid` variable, using the `AsmParser` class and the `getImm` method to get the immediate value. The `VK` variable is also passed as an argument to the `classifySymbolRef` method." LLVM,RISCV,725,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return false;` Explanation: The code snippet is a method named `isBareSymbol` that takes no arguments and returns a `bool`. The method checks if the current symbol is a bare symbol by checking if it is an immediate value and if it can be evaluated to a constant value. If the symbol is not an immediate value or if it cannot be evaluated to a constant value, the method returns `false`. The next statement in the code snippet is `return false;`, which means that the method will return `false` if" LLVM,RISCV,726,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return IsConstantImm && ( Imm != ) && ( isUInt < > ( Imm ) || ( Imm >= && Imm <= ) ) && VK == MCExpr :: VK__None ;` This statement is a return statement that returns a boolean value indicating whether the given expression is a constant immediate value that is not equal to a" LLVM,RISCV,727,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return IsConstantImm && ( Imm != ) && ( isUInt < > ( Imm ) || ( Imm >= && Imm <= ) ) && VK == MCExpr :: VK__None ;` This statement is a return statement that returns a boolean value indicating whether the given expression is a constant immediate value that is not equal to a" LLVM,RISCV,728,"The code snippet is checking if a given string is a valid identifier in a programming language. The identifier must satisfy the following conditions: 1. It must contain only letters, digits, and underscores. 2. It must not start with a digit. 3. It must not contain any whitespace characters. 4. It must not contain any special characters (such as !, @, #, $, etc.). The code snippet is using a `StringRef` object to store the string and a `char` variable to store the previous character. It is iterating over the characters of the string using" LLVM,RISCV,729,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return true;` Explanation: The code snippet is checking if the string `Str` contains only the characters 'i', 'o', 'r', and 'w' in a specific order. If any character other than these four is found, the function returns `false`. If a character is found that is less than or equal to the previous character, the function also returns `false`. If the entire string is traversed and all characters are found in the correct order, the function returns `true`." LLVM,RISCV,730,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return IsConstantImm && IsInRange && VK == MCExpr :: VK__None;` This statement returns a boolean value indicating whether the given expression is a constant immediate value, and whether the value is within the specified range for the given instruction. The `IsInRange` variable is set to `true` if the value is within the range, and `false` otherwise. The `VK` variable is set to the appropriate value for the instruction based on the" LLVM,RISCV,731,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be the implementation of the `isReg` method, which is a member function of the `Instruction` class. The method returns a boolean value indicating whether the instruction is a register instruction. Here is a possible implementation of the `isReg` method: ``` bool Instruction::isReg() const { return Kind == Register; } ``` This implementation simply returns the value of the `Kind` member variable, which is assumed to be a `Register` type. The `const` keyword at the end of the method signature indicates that" LLVM,RISCV,732,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet without knowing the specific values of the variables and the context in which the code is being executed. However, based on the syntax and the information provided, it appears that the code is checking whether a given value is a constant immediate value, and if so, whether it is a shifted integer value within a certain range. If the value meets these conditions, the code sets the variable `VK` to a specific value. Without more information, it is not possible to determine the exact next statement of the code. However, some possible next statements could include:" LLVM,RISCV,733,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return false;` This is because the `if` statement checks if `isImm()` returns `false`, and if it does, the function returns `false`." LLVM,RISCV,734,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return IsConstantImm && isInt < > ( Imm ) && VK == MCExpr :: VK__None;` This statement is a return statement that returns a boolean value indicating whether the expression is a constant immediate value and whether the immediate value is an integer literal of the specified size and whether the value kind is none." LLVM,RISCV,735,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be a `return` statement, as it is the last statement in the code snippet. The `return` statement will return a boolean value, which is the result of the expression `IsConstantImm && isInt < > ( Imm ) && ( Imm != ) && VK == MCExpr :: VK__None`. The expression `IsConstantImm` is a boolean value that is set to" LLVM,RISCV,736,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return IsConstantImm && isInt < > ( Imm ) && ( Imm != ) && VK == MCExpr :: VK__None;` This statement is a return statement that returns a boolean value indicating whether the expression is a constant immediate value and whether it is an integer literal with a specific value and whether the value kind is not equal to a specific value. The specific values used in the expression are `<" LLVM,RISCV,737,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the `isToken` method is dependent on the implementation of the `Token` class and the specific input it is being called with. However, based on the name of the method and the fact that it is declared as a `const` method, it is likely that the method is checking whether a given input is a valid token or not. The method may be using some internal state or logic to determine this, and the next statement could be a check or a comparison of some kind. Without more information" LLVM,RISCV,738,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the context in which the code is being executed and the values of the variables involved. However, based on the syntax and the fact that the code is checking the equality of two variables, it is likely that the next statement will be a conditional statement, such as an if statement or a switch statement, that will execute different code based on the result of the equality check." LLVM,RISCV,739,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `isImm` function and the `MCExpr` class. However, based on the information provided, it is likely that the next statement will be: `Imm = getImm ( ) ;` This is because the `isImm` function is called, and if it returns `false`, the `getImm` function is called to retrieve the immediate value. The `getImm` function is likely to return an `int64_t` value" LLVM,RISCV,740,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `isImm` and `evaluateConstantImm` functions, as well as the values of the `Imm` and `VK` variables. However, based on the names of the functions and variables, it is likely that the next statement of the code snippet will be a call to the `evaluateConstantImm` function, passing in the `Imm` and `VK` variables as arguments. The `evaluateConstantImm` function will" LLVM,RISCV,741,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `IsValid = AsmParser :: classifySymbolRef ( getImm ( ) , VK , Imm ) ;` This statement is checking if the immediate value is a valid symbol reference, and if so, it sets `IsValid` to `true` and sets `VK` to the appropriate value." LLVM,RISCV,742,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the code depends on the specific values of the variables `Imm` and `VK`. However, based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the function `isUImm5NonZero` is checking whether the value of `Imm` is non-zero and returning a boolean value indicating the result. The function takes no arguments, so it is likely that the value of `Imm` is being set elsewhere in the code. The variable `VK` is also used in the function," LLVM,RISCV,743,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return IsConstantImm && isShiftedUInt < , > ( Imm ) && VK == MCExpr :: VK__None ;` This statement is a return statement that returns a boolean value indicating whether the expression is a constant immediate value and whether it is a shifted unsigned integer with the specified number of literal bits. The `isShiftedUInt` function is called with the `Imm`" LLVM,RISCV,744,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return IsConstantImm && isShiftedUInt < , > ( Imm ) && VK == MCExpr :: VK__None ;` This statement is a return statement that returns a boolean value indicating whether the expression is a constant immediate value and whether it is a shifted unsigned integer with the specified number of literal bits. The `isShiftedUInt` function is called with the `Imm`" LLVM,RISCV,745,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet without knowing the context and the purpose of the code. However, based on the syntax and the variables used, it appears to be a part of a function that is checking if a given value is a constant immediate value and if it is shifted by a certain amount. The function is also checking if the value is of a specific type () and if it has a specific value (MCExpr :: VK__None). Without more information," LLVM,RISCV,746,The next statement after the `if` statement would be the `return false` statement. LLVM,RISCV,747,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return isUInt < > ( Imm ) ;` This is because the `||` operator has a lower precedence than the `&&` operator, so the expression `isRV64 ( ) && isUInt < > ( Imm )` will be evaluated first. If this expression evaluates to `true`, then the entire expression will be `true`, and the `return` statement will be executed. If this expression evaluates to `false`, then the second part of" LLVM,RISCV,748,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return (isRV64( ) && isUInt < > (Imm)) || isUInt < > (Imm);` This statement is the final return statement of the function, and it returns a boolean value indicating whether the given immediate value is a valid immediate value for the current instruction. The return value is determined by the result of the previous two if statements, which check whether the immediate value is a constant expression and whether it is a valid immediate value for the current instruction. If" LLVM,RISCV,749,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `RegisterMCAsmParser` function and the `getThe32Target` function. However, based on the syntax and the context of the code, it is likely that the next statement will be a call to the `RegisterMCAsmParser` function, passing in the result of the `getThe32Target` function as an argument. Here is an example of what the next statement might look like:" LLVM,RISCV,750,"The next statement after the `if` block is: `Operands.push_back(Operand::createImm(Res, S, E, isRV64()));` This statement adds a new operand to the `Operands` vector, which is a vector of `Operand` objects. The new operand is created using the `createImm` method of the `Operand` class, which takes four arguments: `Res`, `S`, `E`, and `isRV64()`. The `Res` argument is a" LLVM,RISCV,751,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `Operands.push_back(Operand::createImm(Res, S, E, isRV64()));` This statement creates a new `Operand` object using the `createImm` method of the `ISA_LIT` class, passing in the `Res` object, the `S` and `E` objects, and the result of the `isRV64` method as arguments. The `Operand` object is then added to the `Operands` vector" LLVM,RISCV,752,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `AsmParser` class and the input provided to the `ParseDirective` method. However, based on the name of the method and the parameters it takes, it is likely that the next statement will be related to parsing an assembly language directive. Some possible next statements could include: * Checking the type of the `DirectiveID` token to determine which directive is being parsed. * Extracting the operands of the directive from the input stream. * Valid" LLVM,RISCV,753,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet without knowing the context and the purpose of the code. However, based on the code provided, it appears that the `DirectiveID` object is being used to retrieve a string value, which is then being assigned to the `IDVal` variable. Without more information, it is not possible to determine the exact purpose of this code or what the next statement might be. If you have any additional context or information about the code, I would be happy to try and help you further." LLVM,RISCV,754,"Based on the code snippet you provided, it appears to be a part of a function that is parsing a directive in an assembly language. The function is checking the value of the `Option` parameter and emitting a directive based on its value. The next statement in the code snippet is: ``` if (Option == ""rvc"") { getTargetStreamer().emitDirectiveOptionRVC(); Parser.Lex(); if (Parser.getTok().isNot(AsmToken::EndOfStatement)) { return Error(Parser.getTok()." LLVM,RISCV,755,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return MatchOperand_NoMatch;` Explanation: The code snippet is part of a function that is trying to match an operand in an assembly language expression. The function is checking the current token in the lexer to determine what kind of operand it is. If the token is not one of the expected types (e.g. a parenthesis, a minus sign, a plus sign, an integer, a string, or an identifier), the function returns `MatchOperand_NoMatch`. The `switch` statement" LLVM,RISCV,756,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific inputs and the behavior of the `parseOperand` function. However, based on the code snippet, it appears that the next statement will be a call to the `parseOperand` function with the `Operands` vector and the `Name` string as arguments. The `parseOperand` function will then attempt to parse the next operand in the input stream and add it to the `Operands` vector. If the `parseOperand` function returns `true`, the code will continue to the next" LLVM,RISCV,757,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `const MCExpr * ModExpr = MCExpr::create(SubExpr, VK, getContext());` This statement creates a new `MCExpr` object by calling the `create` method on the `MCExpr` class, passing in the `SubExpr` object, the `VK` value, and the current context. The resulting `MCExpr` object is stored in the `ModExpr` variable." LLVM,RISCV,758,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific inputs and the behavior of the `getLexer()` and `MatchRegisterName()` functions. However, based on the code snippet, it appears that the next statement will be: `Operands.push_back(Operand::createToken(, FirstS, isRV64()));` This statement will add a new operand to the `Operands` vector, using the `createToken()` method of the `Oper" LLVM,RISCV,759,"The next statement after the code snippet you provided is: `return true;` This is because the `if` statement checks if the `FeatureBitStack` is empty, and if it is, it returns `true`. If the `FeatureBitStack` is not empty, the code inside the `if` statement is executed, which includes popping the last element from the stack and setting the feature bits in the `copySTI` object." LLVM,RISCV,760,The next statement after `case Immediate : OS << * getImm ( ) ; break ;` is `case Register : OS << ; OS << getReg ( ) << ; break ;`. LLVM,RISCV,761,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the input and the specific implementation of the `getToken` and `getSysReg` functions. However, based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the next statement after the `switch` statement will be the `break` statement, which will exit the `switch` block and continue execution at the next statement outside the `switch` block." LLVM,RISCV,762,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `emitToStreamer(Out, MCInstBuilder("""").addReg(Reg).addReg("""").addExpr(Op1.getExpr()));` This statement is calling the `emitToStreamer` function with three arguments: `Out`, a `MCInstBuilder` object, and an expression. The `MCInstBuilder` object is constructed with the string literal """", and the `addReg` and `addExpr` methods are used to add the `Reg` and `" LLVM,RISCV,763,"The next statement after the given code snippet is likely to be another call to the `addAliasForDirective` method of the `Parser` class, as the code snippet is setting up a series of aliases for directives. Therefore, the next statement is likely to be: Parser.addAliasForDirective(, );" LLVM,RISCV,764,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `this->init(STI, Parser, MII, Options);`" LLVM,RISCV,765,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the value of the variable `o` and the specific implementation of the `switch` statement. However, based on the code provided, it is likely that the next statement will be one of the following: * `Imm = o.Imm;` * `Tok = o.Tok;` * `SysReg = o.SysReg;` These statements are the ones that are executed when the value of `o` matches the corresponding case label." LLVM,RISCV,766,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `if ( ( IsRegFPR32 && Kind == MCK_FPR64 ) || ( IsRegFPR32C && Kind == MCK_FPR64C ) ) { Op . Reg . RegNum = convertFPR32ToFPR64 ( Reg ) ; return Match_Success ; }` This statement checks if the register is a 32-bit floating-point register (FPR32) and the kind of operand is a 64-bit floating-point register (FPR" LLVM,RISCV,767,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific values of the variables and the behavior of the functions being called. However, based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the next statement will be: `OutStreamer->EmitLabel(Stubs[i].first);` This is because the loop is currently on the line `OutStreamer->EmitSymbolValue(Stubs[i].second.getPointer(), TD.getPointerSize(), );`, and the" LLVM,RISCV,768,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `AsmPrinter` class and the `EmitInstruction` method. However, based on the name of the method and the parameter it takes, it is likely that the next statement will be related to printing or emitting an instruction. Some possible next statements could include: * `EmitInstruction(MI)`: This would call the `EmitInstruction` method on the `AsmPrinter` object, passing in the `MachineInstr` object `" LLVM,RISCV,769,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `Lower` method and the values of the `MI` and `LoweredMI` variables. However, based on the naming conventions used in the code snippet, it is likely that the `Lower` method is a method that takes a string as input and returns a lowercase version of that string. The `MI` variable is likely a string that represents the original input, and the `LoweredMI` variable is likely a string that represents the lowercase version of the input." LLVM,RISCV,770,"The next statement in the code snippet is: `OutStreamer->EmitValue(Expr, Size);` This statement emits the value of the expression `Expr` to the output streamer `OutStreamer`, with the size of the value being `Size`. The `EmitValue` method is called on the `OutStreamer` object, passing in the `Expr` and `Size` parameters." LLVM,RISCV,771,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return MCSymbolRefExpr::VK_NTPOFF;`" LLVM,RISCV,772,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `RegisterAsmPrinter < AsmPrinter > A ( TheTarget ) ;` This statement registers the `AsmPrinter` class for the specified ISA (Instruction Set Architecture) with the `RegisterAsmPrinter` function. The `RegisterAsmPrinter` function takes two arguments: the first is the name of the ISA, and the second is the `AsmPrinter` class for that ISA. The `ISA_L" LLVM,RISCV,773,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `RegisterAsmPrinter` function and the `ISA_LIT` macro. However, based on the syntax and structure of the code, it is likely that the next statement will be a call to the `RegisterAsmPrinter` function with the `B` variable as an argument, similar to the previous statement. Here is a possible next statement: ``` RegisterAsmPrinter < AsmPrinter > B ( The<" LLVM,RISCV,774,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return false;` This is because the `PrintAsmMemoryOperand` function is returning `false`, which indicates that the memory operand was not printed. The function is called with the `MI` parameter, which is a pointer to a `MachineInstr` object, and the `OpNo` parameter, which is the operand number of the memory operand. The function uses the `getOperand` method of the `MachineInstr` object to get the register and immediate values of the memory operand, and then calls the `print" LLVM,RISCV,775,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `OS << '%' << InstPrinter :: getRegisterName ( MI -> getOperand ( opNum ) . getReg ( ) ) ;` This statement is printing the register name of the operand `opNum` of the instruction `MI` using the `getRegisterName` method of the `InstPrinter` class. The `%` symbol is used to indicate that the operand is a register." LLVM,RISCV,776,"It looks like this is a code snippet from a C++ program that is using the `std::ostream` class to print out some information. The code is using the `<<` operator to insert values into the output stream. The first statement is `OS << '%'`, which will print out the character '%' to the output stream. The second statement is `OS << InstPrinter :: getRegisterName ( MI -> getOperand ( opNum ) . getReg ( ) )`, which will call the `getRegisterName` method of the `InstPr" LLVM,RISCV,777,"The next statement of this code snippet is: O << ; This is because the code is currently inside a switch statement that is checking the type of the machine operand. If the type is MO_Register or MO_Immediate, then the code will execute the statement O << ;." LLVM,RISCV,778,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific input and the behavior of the `MachineOperand` and `InstPrinter` classes. However, based on the code snippet, it appears that the next statement will be one of the following: 1. `O << ;` 2. `MCOperand MC ( Lower . lowerOperand ( MI -> getOperand ( OpNo ) ) ) ;` 3. `InstPrinter :: printOperand ( MC , O ) ;` 4." LLVM,RISCV,779,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `Subtarget->setInstrItinerary(MF.getInstrItinerary());`" LLVM,RISCV,780,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `emitPseudoExpansionLowering` function and the values of the `OutStreamer` and `MI` variables. However, based on the name of the function and the context in which it is being called, it is likely that the next statement will be related to the emission of a pseudo-expansion lowering instruction." LLVM,RISCV,781,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `LowerMachineInstrToMCInst` and `EmitToStreamer` functions. However, based on the names of the functions and the context in which they are being called, it is likely that the next statement will be related to the emission of machine code to an output stream. One possible next statement could be: ``` OutStreamer->EmitInstruction(TmpInst); ``` This would emit the machine instruction represented by" LLVM,RISCV,782,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be: `Res = Res + 1;` This is because the `++` operator is used to increment the value of `Res` by 1. The `` token is likely a placeholder for a specific instruction set architecture (ISA) literal, which is used to indicate the type of instruction that is being executed. The `NumInstrsCompressed` variable is likely a counter that keeps track of the number of instructions that have been compressed." LLVM,RISCV,783,The next statement after the `if` statement is the increment of `NumInstrsCompressed`. LLVM,RISCV,784,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be the initialization of the `AsmPrinter` object with the given `TargetMachine` and `MCStreamer` objects. The `AsmPrinter` constructor is called with the `TM` and `Streamer` objects as arguments, and the `Streamer` object is moved into the `AsmPrinter` object using `std::move`. This is likely to be the first step in setting up the `AsmPrinter` object for use in the code that follows." LLVM,RISCV,785,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be the initialization of the `AsmPrinter` object with the given `TargetMachine` and `MCStreamer` objects. The `AsmPrinter` constructor is called with the `TM` and `Streamer` objects as arguments, and the `Streamer` object is moved into the `AsmPrinter` object using `std::move`. This is likely to be the first step in setting up the `AsmPrinter` object for use in the code that follows." LLVM,RISCV,786,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `emitPseudoExpansionLowering(*OutStreamer, MI);`" LLVM,RISCV,787,"The next statement after the code snippet you provided is: `AsmPrinter::EmitToStreamer(*OutStreamer, Res ? CInst : Inst);` This statement is calling the `EmitToStreamer` function of the `AsmPrinter` class, passing in the `OutStreamer` object and the result of the `compressInst` function (which is either `CInst` or `Inst`, depending on the value of `Res`). The `EmitToStreamer` function will then emit the assembly code for the instruction to the output stream." LLVM,RISCV,788,"This code snippet is part of a function that emits instructions to a streamer. The function takes two parameters: a reference to a `MCStreamer` object and a reference to a `MCInst` object. The function first creates a new `MCInst` object called `CInst`. It then calls the `compressInst` function, which takes four parameters: a reference to the `MCInst` object to be compressed, a reference to the `MCInst` object to be compressed, a reference to the `MCSubtargetInfo` object, and a reference to the context." LLVM,RISCV,789,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be: `RegisterAsmPrinter < AsmPrinter > Z ( getThe128Target ( ) ) ;` This is because the pattern of the previous two statements is to register an assembly printer for a specific target, and the next target to be registered is likely to be the 128-bit target." LLVM,RISCV,790,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `RegisterAsmPrinter < AsmPrinter > X ( getThe32Target ( ) ) ;` This statement registers the `AsmPrinter` class for the given ISA (Instruction Set Architecture) with the `RegisterAsmPrinter` function. The `getThe32Target ( )` function is called to get the target ISA for the current architecture, and the resulting target is passed to the `RegisterAsm" LLVM,RISCV,791,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific values of the variables and the behavior of the functions being called. However, based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the next statement will be: `MO.getReg()` This is because the code is checking the value of `AsmVariant` and `ExtraCode`, and if they are not equal to `` and `false`, respectively, it will report a fatal error. If they are equal, it will retrieve the `MachineOperand` object for the" LLVM,RISCV,792,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `MachineOperand` class and the `getOperand` method. However, based on the code snippet provided, it is likely that the next statement will be a call to the `isReg` method of the `MachineOperand` class, which will return a boolean value indicating whether the operand is a register or not." LLVM,RISCV,793,"Based on the code snippet provided, it is difficult to predict the next statement with certainty. However, based on the context and the control flow of the code, it is likely that the next statement will be: `case MachineOperand::MO_Memory:`. This is because the code is checking the type of the machine operand and printing the appropriate value based on the type. The `MO_Memory` case is not handled in the code snippet provided, so it is likely that the next statement will be the `MO_Memory` case." LLVM,RISCV,794,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `case MachineOperand :: MO_Register : OS << InstPrinter :: getRegisterName ( MO . getReg ( ) ) ; return false ;`" LLVM,RISCV,795,"The next statement in this code snippet is: `RTS.emitTargetAttributes(*STI);` This line of code is calling the `emitTargetAttributes` method on the `RTS` object, which is a `TargetStreamer` object. The `emitTargetAttributes` method is responsible for emitting the target attributes for the current target. The `STI` parameter is a pointer to the `SubtargetInfo` object, which contains information about the current target." LLVM,RISCV,796,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `TargetStreamer` class and the `getTargetStreamer` method. However, based on the code snippet provided, it is likely that the next statement will be a call to a method of the `TargetStreamer` class, such as `emit` or `write`, to write data to the output stream." LLVM,RISCV,797,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet without knowing the context and the purpose of the code. However, based on the code snippet provided, it appears to be related to the LLVM compiler infrastructure. The code is casting a pointer to a `TargetStreamer` object to a reference to a `TargetStreamer` object, and then assigning the result to a variable called `RTS`. It is also retrieving the target triple and CPU name from the `TargetMachine` object `TM`. Without more information, it is not possible to determine the next statement of the code snippet" LLVM,RISCV,798,"Based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the next statement will be: O << ; break ; This is because the code is currently in a switch statement that is checking the value of MO.getTargetFlags(). The previous case has already been handled, so the next case that will be executed is the one where MO.getTargetFlags() returns . This case will print the string literal to the output stream O." LLVM,RISCV,799,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific values of the variables and the behavior of the functions called. However, based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the next statement will be: `OS << InstPrinter :: getRegisterName ( MO . getReg ( ) ) ; return false ;` This statement will print the register name corresponding to the register specified by the `MO` object, using the `getRegisterName` function from the `InstPrinter` class. The `return false`" LLVM,RISCV,800,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `TargetStreamer` class and the `getTargetStreamer` method. However, based on the code snippet provided, it is likely that the next statement will be a call to a method of the `TargetStreamer` class, such as `emit` or `write`, to write data to the output stream." LLVM,RISCV,801,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `TargetMachine` and `Subtarget` classes, as well as the values of the variables `TM`, `TT`, `CPU`, `FS`, and ``. However, based on the code snippet you provided, it appears that the next statement after the declaration of `STI` would be the initialization of the `Subtarget` object `STI` using the `Subtarget` constructor. The constructor takes several parameters, including a `TargetMachine` object" LLVM,RISCV,802,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `RTS.emitDirectiveOptionPop();` This is because the `if` statement checks if the current basic block is a hardware loop basic block, and if it is, it calls the `emitDirectiveOptionPop()` method on the target streamer object `RTS`." LLVM,RISCV,803,"The next statement after the code snippet you provided is: `RTS.setTargetStreamer(OutStreamer);`" LLVM,RISCV,804,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be: `RTS.emitDirectiveOptionNoRVC();` This is because the previous statement, `RTS.emitDirectiveOptionPush()`, pushes a new option onto the option stack, and the next statement is likely to be the option that is being pushed. The `emitDirectiveOptionNoRVC()` method is a member of the `TargetStreamer` class, and it is used to emit a directive that disables the use of compressed instructions in the target streamer." LLVM,RISCV,805,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be: `RTS.EmitBasicBlockStart(MBB);` This is because the `isHwlpBasicBlock` method is called on the `RVFI` object, which is an instance of the `MachineFunctionInfo` class. If the block is a hardware loop basic block, the `EmitBasicBlockStart` method is called on the `RTS` object, which is an instance of the `TargetStreamer` class. This method is used to emit the start of a basic block in the target streamer." LLVM,RISCV,806,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet without knowing the specific implementation of the `MachineFunctionInfo` class and the `getMF` and `getInfo` methods. However, based on the naming conventions used in the code, it is likely that the next statement will be a call to a method or function that returns a value of type `ISA_LIT`." LLVM,RISCV,807,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `STI = TM.getMCSubtargetInfo();`" LLVM,RISCV,808,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `STI = TM.getMCSubtargetInfo();`" LLVM,RISCV,809,"The next statement after the code snippet you provided is: `return false;` This statement is the last statement in the function, and it returns a value of `false` to indicate that the function did not complete successfully." LLVM,RISCV,810,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `bool AsmPrinter :: runOnMachineFunction ( MachineFunction & MF ) { // ... return false; }` This is a function definition for the `runOnMachineFunction` method of the `AsmPrinter` class. The function takes a `MachineFunction` object as an argument and returns a `bool` value indicating whether the function was successful or not. The function body is not shown in the code snippet, but it likely contains the logic for printing the assembly code for the machine" LLVM,RISCV,811,"The next statement in this code snippet is: `case MachineOperand::MO_Immediate:`." LLVM,RISCV,812,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `lower` function and the `MachineOperandToMCOperand` function. However, based on the names of these functions, it is likely that the next statement will be a call to the `MachineOperandToMCOperand` function, which is responsible for converting a `MachineOperand` object to an `MCOperand` object. The `lower` function is likely to be a template function that takes a `MachineOperand` object and an `M" LLVM,RISCV,813,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `RTS.emitTargetAttributes(*MCSTI);`" LLVM,RISCV,814,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `RTS.emitTargetAttributes(*MCSTI);`" LLVM,RISCV,815,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be: RTS.emitEndOfAsmFile(M);" LLVM,RISCV,816,"The next statement after the code snippet you provided is: `RTS.setTargetStreamer(OutStreamer);`" LLVM,RISCV,817,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of a code snippet without knowing the context and the purpose of the code. However, based on the name of the function `emitFunctionEntryLabel`, it appears to be related to printing assembly code. Based on the syntax of the code, it seems that the function `emitFunctionEntryLabel` is a member function of a class called `AsmPrinter`. The function takes no arguments and does not return any value. Without more information, it is not possible to determine the exact behavior of the function or the next statement that will be executed." LLVM,RISCV,818,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be: `RTS.setTargetABI(STI->getTargetABI());` This is because the previous statement, `RTS = static_castTargetStreamer&>(*OutStreamer->getTargetStreamer());`, assigns the result of `OutStreamer->getTargetStreamer()` to `RTS`, which is a reference to a `TargetStreamer` object. The next statement, `RTS.setTargetABI(STI->getTargetABI());`, calls" LLVM,RISCV,819,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `TmpInst.setOpcode(MI->getOpcode());` This statement sets the opcode of the temporary instruction `TmpInst` to the opcode of the machine instruction `MI`." LLVM,RISCV,820,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `TmpInst.setOpcode(MI->getOpcode());` This statement sets the opcode of the temporary instruction `TmpInst` to the opcode of the machine instruction `MI`." LLVM,RISCV,821,"The next statement in the code snippet is: if (Res) { // Emit the compressed instruction OutStreamer->EmitInstruction(CInst, STI); } else { // Emit the original instruction OutStreamer->EmitInstruction(Inst, STI); }" LLVM,RISCV,822,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `AsmPrinter` class and the `MCStreamer` and `MCInst` classes. However, based on the names of the classes and methods, it is likely that the next statement will be related to printing or emitting the assembly code to a stream. Some possible next statements could include: * `S.EmitInstruction(Inst);` * `S.EmitLabel(Inst.getLabel());` * `S.EmitComment(Inst" LLVM,RISCV,823,"The next statement of this code snippet is: return ""getPassName"";" LLVM,RISCV,824,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `RegisterAsmPrinter < AsmPrinter > X ( getThe32Target ( ) ) ;` This statement is registering the `ISA_LIT` AsmPrinter with the `getThe32Target()` function, which is a function that returns a pointer to the `ISA_LIT` 32-bit target. The `RegisterAsmPrinter` function is a template function that takes a pointer" LLVM,RISCV,825,"The next statement in the code snippet is: `case MachineOperand::MO_GlobalAddress:`." LLVM,RISCV,826,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `case MachineOperand :: MO_BlockAddress : { MCSymbol * Sym = GetBlockAddressSymbol ( MO . getBlockAddress ( ) ) ; Sym -> print ( OS , MAI ) ; return false ; }` This statement is a case label for the `MO_BlockAddress` enumeration value of the `MachineOperand` class. It defines a block of code that will be executed if the operand is a block address. The code inside the block first retrieves the symbol associated with the block address using the `GetBlockAddressSymbol`" LLVM,RISCV,827,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be the initialization of the `MCSTI` member variable, which is a `const MCSubtargetInfo*` pointer. The initialization is done by calling the `getMCSubtargetInfo()` method on the `TargetMachine` object `TM`, and passing the result to the `MCSTI` constructor. Therefore, the next statement of this code snippet is likely to be: ``` MCSTI = new MCSubtargetInfo(TM.getMCSubtargetInfo()); ``` This statement creates a new `MCSubtargetInfo` object and" LLVM,RISCV,828,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be the initialization of the `MCSTI` member variable, which is a `const MCSubtargetInfo*` pointer. The initialization is done by calling the `getMCSubtargetInfo()` method on the `TargetMachine` object `TM`, and passing the result to the `MCSTI` constructor. Therefore, the next statement of this code snippet is likely to be: ``` MCSTI = new MCSubtargetInfo(TM.getMCSubtargetInfo()); ``` This statement creates a new `MCSubtargetInfo` object and" LLVM,RISCV,829,The next statement in the code snippet is `SetupMachineFunction(MF)`. LLVM,RISCV,830,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific values of the variables and the implementation of the functions involved. However, based on the information provided, it is possible to make some educated guesses. The first `if` statement checks if `isRV32Only` is true and if `ActiveFeatures` contains the string literal ``. If both conditions are true, the function returns `false`. The second `if` statement checks if `FeaturesRequired` is empty. If it is, the function returns" LLVM,RISCV,831,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `if ( TargetABI != ABI_Unknown ) return TargetABI ;` This statement checks if the `TargetABI` variable is not equal to `ABI_Unknown`, and if it is not, it returns the value of `TargetABI`. If `TargetABI` is equal to `ABI_Unknown`, the code will continue to the next statement." LLVM,RISCV,832,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `if (TargetABI != ABI_Unknown) return TargetABI;` This statement checks if the `TargetABI` variable is not equal to `ABI_Unknown`, and if it is not, it returns the value of `TargetABI`. If `TargetABI` is equal to `ABI_Unknown`, the code continues to the next `if` statement." LLVM,RISCV,833,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the code depends on the values of the variables and the specific implementation of the `std::make_pair` function. However, based on the information provided, it is likely that the next statement will be one of the following: * `return std::make_pair( << static_cast(VLMUL), false);` * `return std::make_pair( << static_cast(VLMUL), true" LLVM,RISCV,834,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `encodeSEW` function and the value of the `SEW` parameter. However, based on the name of the function and the parameter, it is likely that the function is used to encode a value of a specific width (SEW) into a binary representation. The function may use a specific encoding scheme, such as a fixed-width encoding or a variable-width encoding, to encode the value. Without more information about the specific implementation of the `encodeSEW" LLVM,RISCV,835,"The next statement after the code snippet you provided is likely to be a call to a function or method that takes the `SEW` object as an argument, and performs some operation on it. Without more context, it's difficult to provide a more specific prediction. However, based on the code snippet you provided, it's possible that the next statement could be a call to a function that validates the `SEW` object, or a call to a method that performs some operation on the `SEW` object. It's also possible that the next statement could be a call to a" LLVM,RISCV,836,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `unsigned VLMULBits = static_cast < unsigned > ( VLMUL ) ;` This statement casts the `VLMUL` value to an `unsigned` integer, which is then assigned to the `VLMULBits` variable." LLVM,RISCV,837,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the `encodeVTYPE` function is dependent on the specific implementation of the `VType` class and the values of the input parameters. However, based on the name of the function and the parameters it takes, it is likely that the function is responsible for encoding a vector type based on the input parameters. The `VLMUL` parameter is likely a multiplier for the vector length, and the `SEW` parameter is likely a shift amount for the vector element width. The `TailAgnost" LLVM,RISCV,838,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return isCheriPureCapABI(TargetABI) ? ""CheriPureCap"" : ""Cheri"";`" LLVM,RISCV,839,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific values of the variables and the behavior of the functions called within the `getConstraint` function. However, based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the `getConstraint` function is returning a value of type `VConstraintType` based on the value of the `TSFlags` parameter." LLVM,RISCV,840,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific values of the variables and the behavior of the functions called within the `getConstraint` function. However, based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the `getConstraint` function is returning a value of type `VConstraintType` based on the value of the `TSFlags` parameter." LLVM,RISCV,841,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `TargetABI = StringSwitch < ABI > ( ABIName ) . Case ( , ABI_ILP32 ) . Case ( , ABI_ILP32F ) . Case ( , ABI_ILP32D ) . Case ( , ABI_ILP32E ) . Case ( , ABI_IL32PC64 ) . Case ( );` This is because the `if` statement checks if the system is 64-bit and if the `FeatureBits` array does not contain the specified string literal. If both conditions are true, the `report_fatal_error` function will be called with the" LLVM,RISCV,847,"The next statement after the code snippet you provided is: `return static_cast(Fractional ? NUM_LIT - LmulLog2 : LmulLog2);` This statement is a return statement that returns a value of type `STR_LIT` (a string literal) based on the value of the `Fractional` variable. If `Fractional` is true, the statement returns the result of subtracting `LmulLog2` from `NUM_LIT`. If `Fractional` is false, the statement returns `LmulLog" LLVM,RISCV,848,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be: `OS << ;` This is because the previous statement ends with a `break` statement, which exits the loop and continues execution at the next statement outside the loop. The next statement outside the loop is `OS << ;`, which is likely to be the next statement executed." LLVM,RISCV,849,"Based on the code snippet provided, it appears to be a part of a larger function that is generating a string representation of a value. The code is using the `<<` operator to concatenate strings and values, and the `switch` statement to handle different cases based on the value of `VLMUL`. The next statement in the code snippet is: `OS << << LMul;` This statement is inside the `case :` block, which means that it will only be executed if `VLMUL` is equal to `<" LLVM,RISCV,850,"The next statement in the code snippet is: `errs ( ) << ; TargetABI = ABI_Unknown ;` This statement is part of the `else if` block that checks if the ABI name ends with the string literal `` and if the `FeatureBits` array does not contain the string literal ``. If this condition is true, the statement prints an error message to the `errs` stream and sets the `TargetABI` variable" LLVM,RISCV,851,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `unsigned VTypeI = ( ( VLMULBits & ) << ) | ( VSEWBits << ) | ( VLMULBits & );` This statement is assigning the result of the bitwise OR operation to the variable `VTypeI`. The bitwise OR operation is performed between the result of the bitwise AND operation and the result of the left shift operation. The result of the bitwise AND operation is" LLVM,RISCV,852,"The next statement after the code snippet you provided is: `return static_cast < int8_t > ( MergeOpIndex ) ;` This statement is a return statement that returns the value of `MergeOpIndex` cast to an `int8_t` type." LLVM,RISCV,853,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the program depends on various factors such as the input data, the specific implementation of the `getSEWIndex` method, and the overall logic of the program. However, based on the name of the method and the fact that it is a `const` method, it is likely that the method returns an index value that is used to access an element in a collection or array. The return value could be an integer or a string, depending on the specific implementation of the method. Without more information about" LLVM,RISCV,854,"The next statement of this code snippet is: return static_cast(SEWIndex);" LLVM,RISCV,855,"The next statement after the code snippet you provided is not specified in the code snippet itself. The code snippet is a function that takes an argument `VLIndex` and returns a value of type `int8_t`. The function uses a `static_cast` to convert the value of `VLIndex` to an `int8_t` and then returns the converted value. Therefore, the next statement after the code snippet would depend on the context in which the code snippet is being executed. It could be a statement that uses the returned value, such as assigning it to a variable or passing it as" LLVM,RISCV,856,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the `getVLIndex` function is not specified. However, based on the name of the function and the fact that it is a member of a class, it is likely that the function returns an index value that represents the position of the current object in a container or other data structure." LLVM,RISCV,857,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `unsigned VLMUL = ( VType & ) | ( ( VType & ) >> ) ;` This statement is a bitwise OR operation between two values: * `( VType & )`: This is a bitwise AND operation between the `VType` variable and a literal value. The result of this operation is a bitwise combination of the bits of `VType` and the literal value. * `( ( V" LLVM,RISCV,858,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `unsigned VLMUL = ( VType & ) | ( ( VType & ) >> ) ;` This statement is a bitwise OR operation between two values: * `( VType & )`: This is a bitwise AND operation between the `VType` variable and a literal value. The result of this operation is a bitwise combination of the bits of `VType` and the literal value. * `( ( V" LLVM,RISCV,859,"The next statement after the code snippet you provided is likely to be the return statement, which is not included in the code snippet you provided. The code snippet you provided is a C++ code that is using the `static_cast` operator to cast the `VSEW` variable to a specific type, which is determined by the `ISA_LIT` macro. The `ISA_LIT` macro is likely to be defined as a constant integer value that represents the size of the vector element width (VSEW) in bits. The `static_cast` operator is used to perform" LLVM,RISCV,860,"The next statement of this code snippet is: unsigned VSEW = ( VType >> ) & ; This statement is a bitwise AND operation between the result of a right shift of VType by bits and a literal value . The result of the operation is stored in the variable VSEW." LLVM,RISCV,861,"The next statement of this code snippet is: return HasDummyMask;" LLVM,RISCV,862,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the value of `Offset` is not known. However, based on the syntax of the code, it appears that `Offset` is being declared as an unsigned integer variable and assigned the value ``." LLVM,RISCV,863,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty because it depends on the value of `TSFlags` and the implementation of the `hasSEWOp` and `hasVecPolicyOp` functions. However, based on the information provided, it is likely that the next statement will be either: ``` Offset = ; ``` or ``` Offset = ; ``` depending on the value of `TSFlags` and the implementation of the `hasSEWOp` and `hasVecPolicyOp` functions." LLVM,RISCV,864,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be a conditional statement that checks the value of the `TSFlags` variable and performs a specific action based on its value. The `assert` statement is used to check if a condition is true, and if it is not, the program will terminate with an error message. In this case, the condition being checked is whether the `hasSEWOp` and `hasVLOp` functions return true for the `TSFlags` variable. If either of these functions return false, the program will terminate with an error message. Therefore, the next statement" LLVM,RISCV,865,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return Desc.getNumOperands() - Offset;` This statement returns the number of operands in the `Desc` object minus the `Offset` value, which is either 0 or 1 depending on the value of `hasVecPolicyOp(TSFlags)`." LLVM,RISCV,866,"The next statement of this code snippet is: return (TSFlags & UsesMaskPolicyMask) != 0;" LLVM,RISCV,867,"The next statement after `return TSFlags & UsesMaskPolicyMask` would be the next line of code after the `if` statement that contains this code snippet. Without seeing the rest of the code, it's difficult to say exactly what the next statement would be, but it's likely to be a statement that is executed after the `if` statement has been evaluated." LLVM,RISCV,868,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the program depends on the specific input and the implementation of the `getBPReg` function. However, based on the code snippet provided, it is likely that the next statement will be a return statement that returns the value of the `BPReg` register." LLVM,RISCV,869,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `getSCSPReg` function and the state of the system at the time of execution. However, based on the name of the function and the fact that it is returning a `Register` object, it is likely that the next statement will be a call to a method on the `Register` object, such as `getRegisterValue` or `setRegisterValue`." LLVM,RISCV,870,The next statement after `case ABI_LP64D : return false ;` is `case ABI_IL32PC64 :`. LLVM,RISCV,871,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return VTypeI;` This is the final statement of the function, and it returns the value of `VTypeI` to the caller." LLVM,RISCV,872,"The next statement after the code snippet you provided is likely to be the return statement, which is not included in the code snippet you provided. The code snippet you provided is a C++ function that takes a single argument, `VLMUL`, and returns a value of type `ISA_LIT`. The function uses a `static_cast` to convert the value of `VLMUL` to the type `ISA_LIT`, and then returns the converted value. Without seeing the rest of the code, it's difficult to say exactly what the next statement will be, but it" LLVM,RISCV,873,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the code depends on the specific values of the variables and the implementation of the operators. However, based on the information provided, we can make some educated guesses about the possible next statements. The code snippet is using the bitwise AND operator (`&`) to perform a bitwise AND operation on the value of `VType` and a literal value (``). The result of this operation is stored in the variable `VLMUL`. Based on the name of the" LLVM,RISCV,874,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return static_cast < VSEW > ( VSEW ) ;` This statement is a return statement that returns the value of `VSEW` cast to the type specified by the `ISA_LIT` template parameter. The `static_cast` operator is used to perform the cast." LLVM,RISCV,875,"Based on the code snippet you provided, it appears that the next statement will be: `errs() << << ABIName << ;` This is because the `else if` block that follows the `if` block will only be executed if the `if` block's condition is not met. Since the `if` block's condition is `ABIName.startswith() && IsRV64`, and the `else if` block's condition is `ABIName.startswith(" LLVM,RISCV,876,"Based on the code snippet you provided, it appears that the next statement will be: `errs() << ;` This is because the code is checking the `ABIName` variable against a series of string literals using the `endswith()` method, and if the `ABIName` variable ends with one of the string literals, it will set the `TargetABI` variable to `ABI_Unknown` and print an error message using the `errs()` function. If the `ABI" LLVM,RISCV,877,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the context in which the code is being executed and the specific implementation of the `WritesElement0` method. However, based on the name of the method, it is likely that it is returning a value that is related to writing an element at index 0 in a collection or array." LLVM,RISCV,878,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the function is dependent on the specific implementation of the `writesElement0` function. However, based on the name of the function, it is likely that the next statement will be a check to see if the element at index 0 can be written to. This could involve checking the bounds of the array, checking the type of the element at index 0, or checking the state of the element at index 0. Without more information about the specific implementation of the `writesElement0` function, it is not" LLVM,RISCV,879,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `FeatureVector.push_back(std::string() + Feature.Key);` This statement adds the key of the current feature to the `FeatureVector` if the corresponding bit in the `FeatureBits` bitset is set and the key is not empty. The `std::string()` constructor creates a new string object from the `STR_LIT` literal, and the `+` operator concatenates the key to the end of the string." LLVM,RISCV,880,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `FeatureVector.push_back(std::string() + Feature.Key);` This statement adds the key of the current feature to the `FeatureVector` if the corresponding bit in the `FeatureBits` bitset is set and the key is not empty. The `std::string()` constructor creates a new string object from the `STR_LIT` literal, and the `+` operator concatenates the key to the end of the string." LLVM,RISCV,881,"Based on the code snippet, it appears that the next statement will be: `if (IsRV32E) { ... }` This is because the code is checking the value of the `IsRV32E` variable, which is set to `FeatureBits[]` earlier in the code. If `IsRV32E` is true, then the code will execute the block of code inside the `if` statement." LLVM,RISCV,882,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `VTypeI |= ;` This is because the `if` statement that precedes it checks the value of `TailAgnostic`, and if it is true, the code inside the `if` block is executed, which sets the `VTypeI` variable to the result of the bitwise OR operation between `VTypeI` and ``." LLVM,RISCV,883,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `unsigned VTypeI = (VSEWBits << ) | (VLMULBits & );` This statement is assigning the result of the bitwise OR operation between `VSEWBits` and `VLMULBits` to `VTypeI`. The `<<` operator is used to shift the bits of `VSEWBits` to the left by `NUM_LIT` positions, and the `&` operator is used to perform a bitwise AND operation between" LLVM,RISCV,884,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific values of the variables and the behavior of the `std::vector` class. However, based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the next statement will be: `FeatureVector.push_back(std::string() + Feature.Key);` This statement will add a new element to the `FeatureVector` vector, which is a string concatenation of the `std::string` literal and the `Feature.Key` value. The `std::string" LLVM,RISCV,885,"Based on the code snippet you provided, it appears to be a part of a larger function that is generating a string representation of a vector type. The code is using a `switch` statement to handle different cases based on the value of `VLMUL`, which is presumably an enumeration or integer value representing the vector length multiplier. The next statement after the `switch` statement is: ``` if (isTailAgnostic(VType)) OS << ; ``` This statement checks if the vector type `VType` is tail-agnostic, and if" LLVM,RISCV,886,"The next statement of this code snippet is: OS << ""LMul"" << LMul; Explanation: The code snippet is part of a larger program that is generating a string representation of a vector instruction. The variable ""OS"" is an output stream, and the variable ""LMul"" is a value that represents the vector multiplication factor. The code is using the ""<<"" operator to concatenate the string ""LMul"" with the value of ""LMul"" and write it to the output stream." LLVM,RISCV,887,"Based on the code snippet you provided, it appears to be part of a larger function that is generating a string representation of a data type. The code is using a `switch` statement to handle different cases based on the value of `VType`. The next statement in the code snippet is: ``` OS << << LMul; ``` This statement is using the `<<` operator to concatenate the string representation of `LMul` to the output stream `OS`. The `LMul` variable is an unsigned integer that is being shifted left by a number of" LLVM,RISCV,888,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `errs() << ;` This statement is part of the `else if` block that checks if `IsRV32E` is true and `TargetABI` is not equal to `ABI_ILP32E` or `ABI_Unknown`. If this condition is true, the code will print an error message to the console using the `errs()` function, and then set `TargetABI` to `ABI_Unknown`." LLVM,RISCV,889,"Based on the code snippet you provided, it appears that the next statement will be: `TargetABI = ABI_Unknown;` This is because the `else if` block that follows the `if` statement will only be executed if the `ABIName` is not empty and the `TargetABI` is not `ABI_Unknown`. Since the `ABIName` is not empty and the `TargetABI` is `ABI_Unknown`, the `else if` block will be executed, and the `TargetABI` will be set to `ABI_Unknown`." LLVM,RISCV,890,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be a `return` statement, as the `assert` statement is used to check that the input `VSEW` is within a certain range, and if it is not, the function will exit with an error message. Therefore, the next statement of this code snippet is likely to be a `return` statement that returns a value based on the input `VSEW`. The exact value returned will depend on the specific implementation of the function, but it is likely to be a value that is related to the input `VSEW` in some way." LLVM,RISCV,891,"The next statement of this code snippet is: return TSFlags & ForceTailAgnosticMask;" LLVM,RISCV,892,The next statement after `return ;` would be the end of the function. LLVM,RISCV,893,"I'm not able to provide a prediction for the next statement of this code snippet as it appears to be incomplete and contains syntax errors. The `MCRegister` type is not defined, and the `getBPReg` function is not properly closed. Additionally, the code snippet does not provide enough context to determine the expected behavior of the function. If you could provide more information or clarify the question, I would be happy to try and assist you further." LLVM,RISCV,894,"The code snippet is extracting the instruction format from the `TSFlags` variable. The `InstFormatMask` is used to mask out the bits that correspond to the instruction format, and the `InstFormatShift` is used to shift the bits to the right to get the format value. Based on the code, the next statement would be: ``` return ( TSFlags & InstFormatMask ) >> InstFormatShift ; ``` This statement will return the instruction format value, which is the result of shifting the bits of `TSFlags` right by `InstFormatShift` bits, and" LLVM,RISCV,895,"The next statement of this code snippet is: return ( TSFlags & InstFormatMask ) >> InstFormatShift;" LLVM,RISCV,896,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `MCRegister` class and the `getSCSPReg` method. However, based on the name of the method and the return type, it is likely that this method is used to retrieve a specific register from a microcontroller's (MC) system control and protection (SCSP) module. Without more information about the specific implementation of this code, it is difficult to provide a more detailed prediction of the next statement. If you have additional context or information about the code, I" LLVM,RISCV,897,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return decodeVSEW(VSEW);` This statement is the last statement in the code snippet, so it will be executed after the previous statements have been executed. The `return` statement returns the value of the `decodeVSEW` function, which is called with the `VSEW` variable as its argument. The `decodeVSEW` function is not shown in the code snippet, so it is not possible to determine what it does or what value it returns." LLVM,RISCV,898,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the code depends on the specific values of the variables and the implementation of the `static_cast` operator. However, based on the syntax and the fact that the `static_cast` operator is being used to cast a value to a string literal, it is likely that the next statement will be a string concatenation or assignment operation. For example, the next statement could be: ``` return static_cast(VLMUL) + ""some string""; ``` This" LLVM,RISCV,899,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the `getVLMUL` function is not specified. However, based on the name of the function and the parameter it takes, it is likely that the function returns a string literal that represents the VLMUL value for the given `VType`. Without more information about the code snippet or the context in which it is being used, it is not possible to provide a more specific answer. If you have any additional information or context, please let me know and I will do my best to assist you." LLVM,RISCV,900,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be a conditional statement that checks the value of the `TSFlags` variable and performs a specific action based on the result. Here is a possible next statement: ``` if (TSFlags & HasDummyMaskOpMask) { // Perform some action } ``` This statement checks if the `TSFlags` variable has the `HasDummyMaskOpMask` bit set, and if so, performs some action. The exact action will depend on the context of the code and the intended behavior of the program." LLVM,RISCV,901,"The next statement of this code snippet is: return (TSFlags & HasDummyMaskOpMask) != 0;" LLVM,RISCV,902,"The next statement of this code snippet is: return (TSFlags & HasMergeOpMask) != 0;" LLVM,RISCV,903,"The next statement after the code snippet you provided is: return TSFlags & HasSEWOpMask; This statement is a bitwise AND operation that sets the HasSEWOpMask bit in the TSFlags register if the HasSEWOpMask bit in the TSFlags register is set. The HasSEWOpMask bit is used to indicate that the instruction has a Suppressed Exception Wrapping (SEW) operation mask." LLVM,RISCV,904,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the code depends on the specific values of the variables and the implementation of the functions called. However, based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the function `hasVecPolicyOp` is checking if a certain flag is set in the `TSFlags` variable. If the flag is set, the function returns `true`, otherwise it returns `false`." LLVM,RISCV,905,"The next statement of this code snippet is: return (TSFlags & HasVLOpMask) != 0;" LLVM,RISCV,906,"The next statement after the code snippet you provided is: return TSFlags & HasVLOpMask; This statement is a bitwise AND operation that sets the HasVLOpMask bit in the TSFlags variable if the HasVLOpMask bit is set in the TSFlags variable. The HasVLOpMask bit is used to indicate that the instruction is a vector operation." LLVM,RISCV,907,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return (FeaturesRequired & ActiveFeatures) == FeaturesRequired;` This statement is checking if the `FeaturesRequired` bitset is a subset of the `ActiveFeatures` bitset. If it is, then the function returns `true`, indicating that all the required features are present. If it is not, then the function returns `false`, indicating that not all the required features are present." LLVM,RISCV,908,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `isMaskAgnostic` function and the value of the `VType` parameter. However, based on the name of the function and the parameter, it is likely that the function is checking whether a given value is a mask-agnostic value, which means that it does not depend on the specific mask used to represent the value. In this case, the next statement of the code snippet is likely to be a check of the `VType` parameter to determine whether it" LLVM,RISCV,909,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific values of the variables and the logic of the program. However, based on the syntax and the fact that the code is using the bitwise AND operator, it is likely that the next statement will be a comparison or assignment operation involving the result of the bitwise AND operation." LLVM,RISCV,910,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific values of the variables and the logic of the program. However, based on the syntax and the fact that the code is using the bitwise AND operator, it is likely that the next statement will be a comparison or assignment operation involving the result of the bitwise AND operation." LLVM,RISCV,911,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be a comparison of the `SEW` value to a constant value, possibly to check if it is within a certain range. The `isPowerOf2_32` function is used to check if a given value is a power of 2, and the `SEW` value is being passed as an argument to this function. If the `SEW` value is a power of 2, then the function will return `true`. The next statement is likely to be a comparison of the `SEW` value to a constant value, possibly" LLVM,RISCV,912,"The next statement of this code snippet is: return isPowerOf2_32(SEW) && SEW >= && SEW <= ; This statement is the return statement of the isValidSEW function, which checks if the given SEW value is a power of 2 and within the valid range of to ." LLVM,RISCV,913,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific values of the string literals and the control flow of the program. However, based on the syntax and structure of the code, it appears to be a switch statement with multiple cases, each of which returns a different string literal. The `default` case is a catch-all case that is executed if none of the other cases match. In this case, it appears to be calling a function called `llvm_unreachable`, which is likely a function that is part of the LLVM compiler infrastr" LLVM,RISCV,914,"This code snippet appears to be a part of a switch statement in C or C++. The `llvm_unreachable` function is a macro provided by the LLVM library, which is used to indicate that a particular code path is unreachable. The code snippet you provided is incomplete, so it's difficult to predict the next statement with certainty. However, based on the syntax and the fact that the code is inside a switch statement, it's likely that the next statement will be another case label or a default label. Here are some possible next statements: *" LLVM,RISCV,915,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the `stringToRoundingMode` function is not specified. However, based on the name of the function and the parameter it takes, it is likely that the function is intended to convert a string representation of a rounding mode to an instance of the `RoundingMode` class. Therefore, the next statement of the code snippet is likely to be a call to the `RoundingMode` constructor, passing in the string representation of the rounding mode as an argument. For example: ``` R" LLVM,RISCV,916,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be the `return` statement, which returns the result of the `StringSwitch` expression. The `StringSwitch` expression is a switch statement that takes a string as input and returns a value based on the string. In this case, the input string is `Str`, and the `StringSwitch` expression is used to map the input string to a `RoundingMode` value. The `StringSwitch` expression is defined as follows: ``` StringSwitch < RoundingMode > ( Str ) ``` This expression takes a string `Str`" LLVM,RISCV,917,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific values of the variables and the behavior of the `isArch64Bit` and `report_fatal_error` functions. However, based on the code snippet provided, it is likely that the next statement will be the `report_fatal_error` function call, which will be executed if the following conditions are true: * The current architecture is 64-bit (as determined by the `isArch64Bit` function) * The `FeatureBits` array contains the" LLVM,RISCV,918,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the `validate` function depends on the implementation of the `Triple` and `FeatureBitset` classes, as well as the specific values of the `TT` and `FeatureBits` parameters. However, based on the names of the classes and parameters, it is likely that the `validate` function is checking the validity of a triple (i.e., a set of three values) and a feature bitset (i.e., a set of bits that represent the presence or absence of certain" LLVM,RISCV,919,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it appears to be a part of a larger program and the context is not provided. However, based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the next statement will be the continuation of the `while` loop, with the variable `MadeChange` being set to `false` again. The code snippet is part of a function that appears to be performing some kind of optimization or transformation on a machine code program. The function takes a `MachineFunction` object as an argument, and it appears to be iterating over the basic" LLVM,RISCV,920,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `MBBStartOffset += TII->GetInstSizeInBytes(I);` This statement is executed if the condition `Cond.empty() || Cond[].getImm() == ` is true, which means that the branch instruction is not taken or the branch target is not a basic block. In this case, the size of the branch instruction is added to `MBBStartOffset`." LLVM,RISCV,921,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be a function call to the `createBranchSelectionPass` function, which is defined in the `llvm` namespace. The function takes no arguments and returns a pointer to a `FunctionPass` object. The code snippet is likely to be part of a larger program that is using the LLVM compiler infrastructure to perform optimization and analysis of code. The `createBranchSelectionPass` function is likely to be used to create a new instance of a `FunctionPass` object that is special" LLVM,RISCV,922,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return ""getPassName"";` This is because the `getPassName` function is declared as a virtual function, which means that it can be overridden by a derived class. The `` placeholder is used to indicate that the function returns a string literal, which is a constant string that is stored in the program's memory. The `return` statement is used to return the string literal, which in this case is the string ""getPassName""." LLVM,RISCV,923,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `BSel ( ) : MachineFunctionPass ( ID ) { initializeBSelPass ( * PassRegistry :: getPassRegistry ( ) ) ;` This statement is the constructor for the `BSel` class, which is a subclass of `MachineFunctionPass`. The constructor initializes the `BSel` object by calling the `initializeBSelPass` method on the `PassRegistry` object, which is a singleton class that manages the registration and execution of passes in the LLVM compiler" LLVM,RISCV,924,"Based on the code snippet provided, it is difficult to predict the next statement with certainty. However, based on the context and the structure of the code, it is likely that the next statement will be a function call or a method invocation. The `BSel` function appears to be a machine function pass, which suggests that it is a function that performs some kind of optimization or transformation on a machine code. The `ID` parameter is likely a unique identifier for the machine code, and the `BSel` function is likely to be called with a specific ID value to perform the optimization or transformation." LLVM,RISCV,925,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `EverMadeChange |= MadeChange;` This line updates the `EverMadeChange` variable by setting it to `true` if `MadeChange` is `true`, or leaving it unchanged if `MadeChange` is `false`. The `EverMadeChange` variable is used to track whether any changes have been made to the machine code during the optimization process." LLVM,RISCV,926,The next statement after `if ( F . arg_empty ( ) ) return true ;` is `return false ;`. LLVM,RISCV,927,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet without knowing the specific implementation of the `CallLowering` class and the `lowerCall` method. However, based on the name of the method and the parameters it takes, it appears to be a method that is responsible for lowering a call instruction in some kind of intermediate representation (IR) of a program. The `MachineIRBuilder` parameter is likely an object that is used to build the IR for the program, and the `CallLoweringInfo` parameter is likely an object that contains information about the call instruction that is being lowered." LLVM,RISCV,928,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet without knowing the specific implementation of the `CallLowering` class and the `lowerCall` method. However, based on the name of the method and the parameters it takes, it appears to be a method that is responsible for lowering a call instruction in some kind of intermediate representation (IR) of a program. The `MachineIRBuilder` parameter is likely an object that is used to build the IR for the program, and the `CallLoweringInfo` parameter is likely an object that contains information about the call instruction that is being lowered." LLVM,RISCV,929,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `CallLowering ( const TargetLowering & TLI ) : CallLowering ( & TLI ) {` This is a constructor for the `CallLowering` class, which takes a reference to a `TargetLowering` object as an argument. The constructor initializes the `CallLowering` object with the address of the `TargetLowering` object." LLVM,RISCV,930,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `CallLowering ( const TargetLowering & TLI ) : CallLowering ( & TLI ) {` This is a constructor for the `CallLowering` class, which takes a reference to a `TargetLowering` object as an argument. The constructor initializes the `CallLowering` object with the address of the `TargetLowering` object." LLVM,RISCV,931,"The next statement of the code snippet is: `PrevVSETVLI = nullptr;` This statement is executed when the current instruction `MI` is not a `VSETVLI` instruction, and the previous instruction `PrevVSETVLI` is not null. It sets the `PrevVSETVLI` pointer to null, indicating that there is no previous `VSETVLI` instruction." LLVM,RISCV,932,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `Changed = true;` Explanation: The code snippet is a loop that iterates over the instructions in a basic block. It checks each instruction to see if it is a call or if it modifies a specific register (represented by ``). If it finds such an instruction, it sets `PrevVSETVLI` to `nullptr` and sets `Changed` to `true`. Therefore, the next statement of this code snippet is `Changed = true;`, which updates the `Changed" LLVM,RISCV,933,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `PrevVSETVLI = &MI;` This statement is executed if the condition `PrevAVLReg != AVLReg || PrevVTYPEImm != VTYPEImm` is true, which means that the previous instruction is not a `VSETVLI` instruction or the immediate value of the previous `VSETVLI` instruction is not equal to the immediate value of the current `VSETVLI` instruction. In this case, the `PrevVSETVLI` variable is updated to point to the current `" LLVM,RISCV,934,"The next statement after the code snippet you provided is: `MachineFunctionPass::getAnalysisUsage(AU);` This line calls the `getAnalysisUsage` method of the `MachineFunctionPass` class, passing in the `AnalysisUsage` object `AU` as an argument. The `getAnalysisUsage` method is used to retrieve the analysis usage information for the pass, which is then stored in the `AU` object." LLVM,RISCV,935,"The next statement after the code snippet you provided is: `MachineFunctionPass::getAnalysisUsage(AU);` This line calls the `getAnalysisUsage` method of the `MachineFunctionPass` class, passing in the `AnalysisUsage` object `AU` as an argument. The `getAnalysisUsage` method is used to retrieve the analysis usage information for the pass, which is then stored in the `AU` object." LLVM,RISCV,936,"The next statement of this code snippet is: return _CLEANUP_VSETVLI_NAME;" LLVM,RISCV,937,"The next statement of this code snippet is: return _CLEANUP_VSETVLI_NAME;" LLVM,RISCV,938,"The next statement of this code snippet is: return MachineFunctionProperties ( ) . set ( MachineFunctionProperties :: Property :: IsSSA ) ; This statement returns a new instance of the MachineFunctionProperties class, with the IsSSA property set to true." LLVM,RISCV,939,"Based on the code snippet you provided, it is difficult to predict the next statement with certainty. However, based on the context and the structure of the code, it is likely that the next statement will be a continuation of the `if` statement that is currently being executed. The current `if` statement is checking whether `AVLReg` is equal to a specific string literal and whether the operand of the `MI` object at a specific index is equal to the same string literal. If these conditions are true, the method will return `true`. If the conditions are not true, the method" LLVM,RISCV,940,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `Register AVLReg = MI . getOperand ( ) . getReg ( ) ;` This statement assigns the value of the `getReg()` method of the `getOperand()` method of the `MI` object to the `AVLReg` variable. The `getReg()` method returns the register associated with the operand, and the `getOperand()` method returns the operand at the specified index (in this case, the first operand)." LLVM,RISCV,941,"The next statement after the code snippet you provided is likely to be a call to the `initialize` function, passing in the `ISA_LIT` parameter and the `CleanupVSETVLIPass` object. Here's a breakdown of the code snippet: * `initializeCleanupVSETVLIPass`: This is a function call to the `initialize` function, which is a member function of the `PassRegistry` class. The `` template parameter is used to specify the type of the `ISA" LLVM,RISCV,942,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific inputs and the behavior of the `MachineInstr` class. However, based on the code snippet, it appears that the next statement will be: `PrevVSETVLI = &MI;` This is because the code is iterating over the instructions in a basic block, and `PrevVSETVLI` is being set to the current instruction if it is not a call or does not modify the register ``. The next instruction will be the one after the" LLVM,RISCV,943,"The next statement after the given code snippet is: `if ( ! ST . hasStdExtV ( ) ) return false ;` This statement checks if the `hasStdExtV` method of the `ST` object (which is an instance of the `ISA_LIT` subtarget) returns `false`. If it does, the function returns `false`." LLVM,RISCV,944,The next statement after the `if` block would be the `return false` statement. LLVM,RISCV,945,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the code depends on the specific values of the input parameters `Length` and `IsRV64`. However, based on the name of the function `getAlignmentMask`, it appears that the function is intended to return a bitmask that represents the alignment of a memory region. The `Length` parameter is likely the length of the memory region, and the `IsRV64` parameter is likely a flag that indicates whether the memory region is 64-bit aligned. Without knowing" LLVM,RISCV,946,"The next statement after the `else` block in the code snippet you provided is: `return cc64_get_representable_length(Length);` This statement returns the result of the `cc64_get_representable_length` function, which is called with the `Length` parameter. The `cc64_get_representable_length` function is not defined in the code snippet you provided, so it is not possible to determine what it does or what it returns." LLVM,RISCV,947,"The next statement of this code snippet is: return Align ( cc128_get_required_alignment ( Size ) ) ;" LLVM,RISCV,948,"The next statement of this code snippet is: return Align ( cc128_get_required_alignment ( Size ) ) ;" LLVM,RISCV,949,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return static_cast < TailPaddingAmount > ( llvm :: alignTo ( Size , cc64_get_required_alignment ( Size ) ) - Size ) ;` This statement calculates the amount of tail padding required for the structure, based on the size of the structure and the required alignment of the structure. The `llvm::alignTo` function is used to calculate the aligned size of the structure, and the difference between the aligned size and the size of the structure is the amount of tail padding required. The `static_" LLVM,RISCV,950,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the implementation of the `AddInteger` method and the value of the `Modifier` variable. However, based on the syntax and the fact that the `AddInteger` method is being called on an object with the `ID` identifier, it is likely that the next statement will be an expression that uses the result of the `AddInteger` method, such as: `ID.AddInteger(Modifier) + 1;` This statement would add the value of the `Modifier` variable to" LLVM,RISCV,951,"Based on the code snippet you provided, it appears that the next statement will be: `if (Constants[I].isMachineConstantPoolEntry() && (Constants[I].getAlignment() & AlignMask) == ) {` This statement checks if the current element in the vector `Constants` is a machine constant pool entry and if its alignment is equal to the value stored in the variable `AlignMask`. If both conditions are true, then the code inside the if statement will be executed." LLVM,RISCV,952,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `if (Constants[I].isMachineConstantPoolEntry() && (Constants[I].getAlignment() & AlignMask) == ) {` This is a conditional statement that checks if the current constant pool entry is a machine constant pool entry and if its alignment is equal to the specified alignment mask. If both conditions are true, the code inside the if statement will be executed." LLVM,RISCV,953,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the context in which the code is being executed. However, based on the syntax and the fact that the `return` statement is used to return a value from a function, it is likely that the next statement after this code snippet would be the end of the function." LLVM,RISCV,954,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the program depends on the specific implementation of the `getModifier()` method and the value of the `Modifier` variable. However, based on the code snippet provided, it is likely that the `getModifier()` method is returning a value of type `Modifier`, which is a class or struct that represents a modifier key. The `Modifier` variable is likely an instance of this class or struct, and the `getModifier()` method is returning a reference to this instance. With" LLVM,RISCV,955,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the values of the variables `O` and `GV`. However, based on the syntax, it appears that the code is attempting to output the value of `GV` to the stream `O`." LLVM,RISCV,956,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the program depends on the input data and the specific implementation of the `raw_ostream` class. However, based on the name of the method and the parameters it takes, it is likely that the method will print the value of the `ConstantPoolValue` object to the output stream `O`." LLVM,RISCV,957,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be the initialization of the `GV` and `Modifier` members of the `ConstantPoolValue` class, which are being passed as arguments to the constructor. Here's a possible next statement: ``` GV = gv; Modifier = modifier; ``` This statement initializes the `GV` and `Modifier` members of the `ConstantPoolValue` class with the values passed as arguments to the constructor." LLVM,RISCV,958,"The next statement of this code snippet is: ConstantPoolValue ::= ConstantPoolValue ConstantPoolValue" LLVM,RISCV,959,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the program depends on the specific implementation of the `CoreVHwlpBlocks` class and the input data. However, based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the `CoreVHwlpBlocks` class is being instantiated and returned as the result of the method call." LLVM,RISCV,960,"The next statement of this code snippet is: AU.setPreservesAll();" LLVM,RISCV,961,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be the return statement, which will return the value of the `COREV_HWLP_BLOCKS_NAME` constant." LLVM,RISCV,962,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `BB = Next;` This is because the loop is iterating over the successors of the current basic block `BB`, and `Next` is the next successor to be processed. The loop will continue until all successors of `BB` have been processed." LLVM,RISCV,963,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `CoreVHwlpBlocks` function and the `MachineFunctionPass` class. However, based on the name of the function and the class, it is likely that the next statement will be related to the initialization or setup of a hardware block or a machine function pass. Here are a few possibilities: 1. The next statement could be a call to a function that initializes a hardware block, such as a memory controller or a cache. 2. The next statement could" LLVM,RISCV,964,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `CoreVHwlpBlocks` function and the `MachineFunctionPass` class. However, based on the name of the function and the class, it is likely that the next statement will be related to the initialization or setup of a hardware block or a machine function pass. Here are a few possibilities: 1. The next statement could be a call to a function that initializes a hardware block, such as a memory controller or a cache. 2. The next statement could" LLVM,RISCV,965,"The next statement after the `for` loop will be the `return` statement. The `return` statement will return the value of the `Changed` variable, which is the result of the `ProcessLoop` function." LLVM,RISCV,966,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be: return DecodeStatus::Fail; Explanation: The code snippet is a part of a function named `DecodeFPR32CRegisterClass` that takes four parameters: `Inst`, `RegNo`, `Address`, and `Decoder`. The function checks if the `RegNo` parameter is greater than or equal to a certain value (represented by ``). If it is, the function returns a value of type `DecodeStatus` with the value `DecodeStatus::Fail`." LLVM,RISCV,967,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `addOperand` method and the `MCOperand` class. However, based on the syntax and the context of the code, it is likely that the next statement will be an assignment to the `Reg` variable, such as: `Reg = Reg + 1;` This would increment the value of the `Reg` variable by 1, which is likely to be used as an index into an array or other data structure." LLVM,RISCV,968,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `MCDisassembler` class and the input data. However, based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the next statement will be: `Inst.addOperand(MCOperand::createReg(Reg));` This statement is adding an operand to the `Inst` object, which is an instance of the `MCInst` class. The operand is created using the `MCOperand::createReg` method, which takes a register number" LLVM,RISCV,969,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific values of the variables and the implementation of the `Register` class. However, based on the code snippet provided, it is likely that the next statement will be an assignment to the `Reg` variable, possibly using the value of `RegNo` to determine which register to assign." LLVM,RISCV,970,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be: `Inst.setOpcode(ARM64_REG_FPR64 + RegNo);` This is because the `DecodeFPR64RegisterClass` function is responsible for decoding the FPR64 register class, which is a set of registers that are used to store floating-point values. The `RegNo` parameter is the register number being decoded, and the `Address` parameter is the address of the instruction being decoded. The `Decoder` parameter is a pointer to the decoder object that" LLVM,RISCV,971,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `DecodeFPR64RegisterClass` function and the input values provided to the function. However, based on the function signature and the name of the function, it is likely that the next statement will be a call to the `DecodeFPR64RegisterClass` function, passing in the `Inst` object, the `RegNo` value, the `Address` value, and the `Decoder` object. Here is an example of what the next statement" LLVM,RISCV,972,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific values of the variables and the implementation of the `Register` class. However, based on the code snippet provided, it is likely that the next statement will be an assignment to the `Reg` variable, possibly using the value of `RegNo` to determine which register to assign." LLVM,RISCV,973,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `Inst` and `MCDisassembler` classes. However, based on the code snippet provided, it is likely that the next statement will be a call to the `Inst::addOperand` method, passing in a new `MCOperand` object created using the `MCOperand::createReg` method. The `MCOperand::createReg` method is likely to create a new `MCOperand` object representing a register operand, and the `" LLVM,RISCV,974,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific values of the variables and the behavior of the functions being called. However, based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the next statement will be: `Register Reg = + RegNo;` This statement is assigning a value to the `Reg` variable, which is likely a register name or identifier. The value being assigned is the result of concatenating the string literal `` with the value of the `RegNo` variable. It is possible that" LLVM,RISCV,975,"The next statement in the code snippet is: `Register Reg = + RegNo;` This line of code is adding the value of `RegNo` to the string literal ``, which is likely a register name, to create a new register name. The resulting register name is then stored in the variable `Reg`." LLVM,RISCV,976,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `Inst` class and the `DecodeGPRRegisterClass` function. However, based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the next statement after `Inst.addOperand(Inst.getOperand());` would be `DecodeGPRRegisterClass(Inst, Rs2, Address, Decoder);`. The `Inst.addOperand` method is called with the result of `Inst.getOperand` as its argument" LLVM,RISCV,977,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `DecodeGPRRegisterClass ( Inst , Rs2 , Address , Decoder ) ;` This is because the function `decodeRVCInstrRdRs1Rs2` is decoding a RISC-V instruction with the RVC (RISC-V Compressed) instruction format, which has a 16-bit instruction word. The function is extracting the `Rd` and `Rs2` fields from the instruction word using the `fieldFromInstruction` function, and then decoding the" LLVM,RISCV,978,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `Inst.addOperand(Inst.getOperand());` This statement adds an operand to the instruction `Inst` using the `addOperand` method. The operand is obtained by calling the `getOperand` method on `Inst` with the argument ``." LLVM,RISCV,979,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `DecodeGPRRegisterClass ( Inst , Rs2 , Address , Decoder ) ;` This statement is decoding the `Rs2` field of the instruction, which is the second source register, and passing it to the `DecodeGPRRegisterClass` function along with the `Inst` object, the current address, and the decoder object." LLVM,RISCV,980,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific values of the variables and the implementation of the `DecodeGPRRegisterClass` function. However, based on the context and the names of the variables, it is likely that the next statement will be a call to the `DecodeGPRRegisterClass` function, which will decode the value of the `Rd` register and store the result in the `Address` variable." LLVM,RISCV,981,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be a call to the `decodeSImmOperand` function, passing in the `SImm6` value, the `Address` value, and the `Decoder` object. The function is expected to return a `DecodeStatus` value, which is then assigned to the `Result` variable. The `assert` statement is then used to check that the `Result` value is equal to `MCDisassembler::Success` and that the `STR_LIT` string is not empty. If the assertion fails, it means that" LLVM,RISCV,982,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return MCDisassembler :: Success;` This is the final statement of the `decodeRVCInstrSImm` function, which returns the `MCDisassembler :: Success` value to indicate that the instruction has been successfully decoded." LLVM,RISCV,983,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return Result;` Explanation: The `decodeRVCInstrSImm` function is defined to return a `DecodeStatus` value, which is the result of the `decodeSImmOperand` function. The `decodeSImmOperand` function is called with the `Inst` object, the `SImm6` value, the `Address` value, and the `Decoder` object as arguments. The return value of the `decodeSImmOperand` function is assigned to the `Result" LLVM,RISCV,984,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return new MCDisassembler(T, STI, Ctx);`" LLVM,RISCV,985,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific values of the variables and the implementation of the `MCDisassembler` class. However, based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the next statement will be: `Reg = RegNo + Reg;` This is because the `RegNo` variable is being incremented by 1, and the `Reg` variable is being set to the value of `RegNo` plus the value of the `Reg` variable." LLVM,RISCV,986,"The next statement is likely to be: `Size = ;` The code snippet is checking the size of the `Bytes` object and comparing it to a constant value. If the size is less than the constant value, it returns `MCDisassembler::Fail`. Otherwise, it reads a 32-bit or 16-bit value from the `Bytes` object and decodes the instruction using the `decodeInstruction` function. The `Size` variable is then set to a constant value." LLVM,RISCV,987,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be: `TargetRegistry::RegisterMCDisassembler(getThe128Target(), createDisassembler);` This is because the code is registering a disassembler for each supported target architecture, and the next target architecture after 32-bit and 64-bit is 128-bit. The `getThe128Target()` function is likely to return a pointer to the 128" LLVM,RISCV,988,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `TargetRegistry` class and the `RegisterMCDisassembler` method. However, based on the syntax and the context of the code, it is likely that the next statement will be a call to the `RegisterMCDisassembler` method, passing in the result of the `getThe32Target` method and the `createDisassembler` method as arguments. Here is a possible next statement" LLVM,RISCV,989,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be the initialization of the `MCDisassembler` base class, which is done by calling the constructor of the `MCDisassembler` class with the `STI` and `Ctx` arguments. Here is the predicted next statement: ``` MCDisassembler::MCDisassembler(STI, Ctx) ``` This statement initializes the `MCDisassembler` base class with the `STI` and `Ctx` arguments, which are passed to the constructor of the `MCDisass" LLVM,RISCV,990,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be the initialization of the `MCDisassembler` base class, which is done by calling the constructor of the `MCDisassembler` class with the `STI` and `Ctx` arguments. Here is the predicted next statement: ``` MCDisassembler::MCDisassembler(STI, Ctx) ``` This statement initializes the `MCDisassembler` base class with the `STI` and `Ctx` arguments, which are passed to the constructor of the `MCDisass" LLVM,RISCV,991,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `DecodeGPCRRegisterClass(Inst, , Address, Decoder);` This is because the `if` statement checks if the opcode of the instruction is equal to one of the specified opcodes, and if it is, it calls the `DecodeGPCRRegisterClass` function with the instruction, the number literal, the address, and the decoder as arguments. If the opcode is not equal to any of the specified opcodes, the `if` statement is skipped and the next statement in the code" LLVM,RISCV,992,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `DecodeGPCRRegisterClass(Inst, , Address, Decoder);` This is because the `if` statement checks if the opcode of the instruction is equal to one of the specified strings, and if it is, it calls the `DecodeGPCRRegisterClass` function with the given arguments. If the opcode is not equal to any of the specified strings, the `if` statement will not be executed, and the next statement will be the one after the `if` statement." LLVM,RISCV,993,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the `DecodeFPR16RegisterClass` function depends on the specific implementation of the `MCInst` and `Decoder` classes, as well as the input values of `RegNo` and `Address`. However, based on the name of the function and the parameters it takes, it is likely that the function is responsible for decoding a 16-bit floating-point register class, and the next statement of the code snippet is likely to be a call to a function that performs the actual" LLVM,RISCV,994,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return MCDisassembler::Fail;` This is because the `if` statement checks if `RegNo` is greater than or equal to ``, and if it is, it returns `MCDisassembler::Fail`. If `RegNo` is less than ``, then the function will continue executing the next statement." LLVM,RISCV,995,"It is difficult to predict the next statement with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `MCDisassembler` class and the values of the variables `RegNo` and `NUM_LIT`. However, based on the code snippet you provided, it appears that the next statement will be: `MCRegister Reg = + RegNo ;` This statement assigns the value of `RegNo` to the variable `Reg`, which is a register object. The value of `RegNo` is determined by the previous `if` statement, which checks" LLVM,RISCV,996,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `Inst` and `MCDisassembler` classes. However, based on the code snippet provided, it is likely that the next statement will be a call to the `Inst::addOperand` method, passing in a new `MCOperand` object created using the `MCOperand::createReg` method. The `MCOperand::createReg` method is likely to create a new `MCOperand` object representing a register operand, and the `" LLVM,RISCV,997,The next statement after the `if` statement is `MCRegister Reg = + RegNo;`. LLVM,RISCV,998,The next statement after the `if` statement is `MCRegister Reg = + RegNo;`. LLVM,RISCV,999,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be: `Inst.setOpcode(ARM64_REG_FPR64 + RegNo);` This is because the `DecodeFPR64RegisterClass` function is responsible for decoding the FPR64 register class, which is a set of registers that are used to store floating-point values. The `RegNo` parameter is the register number being decoded, and the `Address` parameter is the address of the instruction being decoded. The `Decoder` parameter is a pointer to the decoder object that" LLVM,RISCV,1000,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the `DecodeGPCRCRegisterClass` function is dependent on the specific implementation of the `MCInst` and `Decoder` classes, as well as the values of the `RegNo` and `Address` parameters. However, based on the name of the function and the parameters it takes, it is likely that the function is responsible for decoding a register class for a general-purpose register (GPR) in a computer's instruction set architecture (ISA). The `RegNo`" LLVM,RISCV,1001,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific values of the variables and the behavior of the functions being called. However, based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the next statement will be: Inst.addOperand(MCOperand::createReg(Reg)); This is because the code snippet is adding an operand to the instruction using the createReg() function, which creates a register operand. The register operand is created using the Reg variable, which is assigned the value of the string literal plus the value of RegNo" LLVM,RISCV,1002,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of the code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `DecodeGPCRRegisterClass` function and the values of the input parameters. However, based on the name of the function and the parameters passed to it, it is likely that the next statement will be a call to the `DecodeGPCRRegisterClass` function, which will decode the GPCR register class and return the decoded value." LLVM,RISCV,1003,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `MCRegister Reg = + RegNo ;` This statement assigns a new value to the `Reg` variable, which is a `MCRegister` object. The new value is the result of concatenating the string literal `` with the value of `RegNo`." LLVM,RISCV,1004,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `MCRegister Reg = + RegNo;` This statement assigns a value to the `Reg` variable, which is a `MCRegister` object. The value is determined by the `RegNo` variable, which is a 64-bit integer, and the `` string literal, which is a string that represents the name of the register. The `+` operator is used to concatenate the two values into a single string." LLVM,RISCV,1005,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be: `Inst.addOperand(MCOperand::CreateReg(Reg));` This statement adds a register operand to the instruction, using the `Reg` variable as the register number. The `MCOperand::CreateReg` function creates a new register operand with the specified register number, and the `Inst.addOperand` method adds the operand to the instruction." LLVM,RISCV,1006,"The next statement is: `bool IsRV32E = FeatureBits[];` This line is checking if the `FeatureBits` bitset contains the feature bit specified by ``. If the feature bit is present, `IsRV32E` is set to `true`, otherwise it is set to `false`." LLVM,RISCV,1007,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `Reg = ;` This is because the `switch` statement is checking the value of `RegNo`, and if it is not equal to `` or ``, it will execute the `default` case, which returns `MCDisassembler :: Fail`. If `RegNo` is equal to `` or ``, it will execute the corresponding case and set `Reg` to ``." LLVM,RISCV,1008,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `Inst . addOperand ( MCOperand :: createReg ( Reg ) ) ;` This statement adds an operand to the `Inst` object, which is an instance of the `MCInst` class. The operand is created using the `MCOperand :: createReg` method, which takes a register as an argument. The register is obtained from the `RI` object, which is an instance of the `MCRegisterInfo` class, by calling the `getMatchingSuperReg` method. The `getMatchingSuperReg" LLVM,RISCV,1009,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `getContext()` and `getRegisterInfo()` methods. However, based on the names of these methods, it is likely that the next statement will retrieve information about the register file or the context of the current instruction." LLVM,RISCV,1010,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `Inst.addOperand(MCOperand::createReg(Reg));` This statement adds an operand to the instruction being disassembled, where the operand is a register. The register is obtained from the `MCRegister` object `Reg`, which was previously initialized using the `getMatchingSuperReg` method of the `MCRegisterInfo` class. The `createReg` method of the `MCOperand` class is used to create a new operand that represents the register. The resulting operand is then added to" LLVM,RISCV,1011,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `Inst . addOperand ( MCOperand :: createReg ( Reg ) ) ;` This statement adds an operand to the `Inst` object, which is an instance of the `MCInst` class. The operand is created using the `MCOperand :: createReg` function, which takes a register as an argument. In this case, the register is `Reg`, which is a `MCRegister` object that was obtained from the `getMatchingSuperReg` function of the `MCRegisterInfo` class." LLVM,RISCV,1012,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `getMatchingSuperReg` and `addOperand` functions, as well as the values of the variables and constants used in the snippet. However, based on the names of the functions and the context in which they are used, it is likely that the next statement of this code snippet will be an assignment to a variable or a call to a function that uses the `MCOperand` object created by the `createReg` function." LLVM,RISCV,1013,"Based on the code snippet you provided, it appears to be a part of a disassembler for a specific instruction set architecture (ISA). The code is checking if the register number is valid and if it is a super register. If the register is not valid or not a super register, it returns an error. The next statement of this code snippet would likely be a check to see if the register is a sub-register, and if so, return the corresponding super register. If the register is not a sub-register, it would likely return the register itself. Here is a possible next statement:" LLVM,RISCV,1014,"It is difficult to predict the next statement with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `MCDisassembler` class and the values of the variables `RegNo` and `NUM_LIT`. However, based on the code snippet you provided, it appears that the next statement will be: `MCRegister Reg = + RegNo ;` This statement assigns the value of `RegNo` to the variable `Reg`, which is a register object. The value of `RegNo` is determined by the previous `if` statement, which checks" LLVM,RISCV,1015,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `LLVM_DEBUG(dbgs() << );` This line is a debug statement that prints a string literal to the debug output stream. The string literal is represented by ``." LLVM,RISCV,1016,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific values of the variables and the behavior of the functions being called. However, based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the next statement will be: Inst.addOperand(MCOperand::createReg(Reg)); This is because the code snippet is adding an operand to the ""Inst"" object using the ""addOperand"" method, and the operand being added is a register, which is created using the ""createReg"" method of the ""MCOperand""" LLVM,RISCV,1017,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `Inst` and `MCDisassembler` classes. However, based on the code snippet provided, it is likely that the next statement will be a call to the `Inst::addOperand` method, passing in a new `MCOperand` object created using the `MCOperand::createReg` method. The `MCOperand::createReg` method is likely to create a new `MCOperand` object representing a register operand, and the `" LLVM,RISCV,1018,"This code snippet is part of a disassembler for the VGR instruction set architecture. It is decoding a register class, which is a set of registers that can be used for a particular instruction. The code is checking if the register number is greater than or equal to a certain number (), and if it is, it returns an error status. This is likely because the register number is out of range for the register class. If the register number is within range, the code creates a new register object and adds it as an operand to the instruction. The register object" LLVM,RISCV,1019,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific values of the variables and the behavior of the functions being called. However, based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the next statement will be: Inst.addOperand(MCOperand::createReg(Reg)); This is because the code snippet is adding an operand to the ""Inst"" object using the ""addOperand"" method, and the operand being added is a register, which is created using the ""createReg"" method of the ""MCOperand""" LLVM,RISCV,1020,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `Inst` class and the `addOperand` method. However, based on the syntax and the fact that the `addOperand` method is being called with a `MCOperand` object created from a `Reg` object, it is likely that the next statement will be an assignment or a method call that uses the `Inst` object and the `MCOperand` object as arguments." LLVM,RISCV,1021,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `MCDisassembler` class and the values of the variables `RegNo` and `NUM_LIT`. However, based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the next statement will be: `Inst.addOperand(MCOperand::createReg(Reg));` This statement adds an operand to the `Inst` object, where the operand is a register specified by the `Reg` variable. The `MCOperand::createReg" LLVM,RISCV,1022,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet without knowing the context and the implementation of the `Inst` and `MCDisassembler` classes. However, based on the syntax and the names of the methods being called, it appears that the code is adding an immediate operand to an instruction and returning a success value. Here is a possible next statement: ``` Inst.addOperand(MCOperand::createReg(SignExtend64(Imm))); ``` This statement would add a register operand to the instruction, with the register being the sign" LLVM,RISCV,1023,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the code depends on the specific values of the input parameters and the implementation of the `decodeUImmOperand` function. However, based on the name of the function and the parameters it takes, it is likely that the function is responsible for decoding an immediate operand for an instruction, and the next statement of the code snippet is likely to be a call to the `decodeUImmOperand` function." LLVM,RISCV,1024,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific values of the variables and the behavior of the functions being called. However, based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the next statement will be: `Inst.addOperand(MCOperand::createImm(Imm));` This statement adds an operand to the instruction being disassembled, using the `MCOperand::createImm` function to create an immediate operand with the value `Imm`. The `MCOperand` class is" LLVM,RISCV,1025,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet without knowing the context and the purpose of the code. However, based on the code snippet provided, it appears to be reading a 32-bit little-endian integer from a byte array. The `` placeholder is likely a string literal, and the `read32le` function is likely a function that reads a 32-bit little-endian integer from a byte array. The `Bytes` object is likely an instance of a class that provides access to a byte array. Without more information," LLVM,RISCV,1026,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the program depends on the specific values of the variables and the implementation of the `FPR32DecoderTable` array. However, based on the code snippet provided, it is likely that the next statement will be an assignment to the `Reg` variable, using the value stored in the `FPR32DecoderTable` array at the index specified by the `RegNo` variable. For example, if the value of `RegNo` is 0, the next statement might be:" LLVM,RISCV,1027,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `Inst.addOperand(MCOperand::createReg(Reg));` This statement adds an operand to the instruction, where the operand is a register. The register is obtained from the `FPR32DecoderTable` array using the `RegNo` variable as the index. The `MCOperand::createReg` function is used to create a new register operand with the specified register number." LLVM,RISCV,1028,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `DecodeFPR64RegisterClass` function and the input values provided to the function. However, based on the function signature and the name of the function, it is likely that the next statement will be a call to the `DecodeFPR64RegisterClass` function, passing in the `Inst` object, the `RegNo` value, the `Address` value, and the `Decoder` object. Here is an example of what the next statement" LLVM,RISCV,1029,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `Inst.addOperand(MCOperand::createReg(Reg));` This statement adds an operand to the instruction, where the operand is a register specified by the `Reg` variable. The `MCOperand::createReg` function is used to create a register operand, and the `Inst.addOperand` function is used to add the operand to the instruction." LLVM,RISCV,1030,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the `decodeSImmOperand` function is not known. However, based on the name of the function and the parameters passed to it, it is likely that the function is responsible for decoding a signed immediate operand from the instruction. The `Inst` parameter is likely an object representing the instruction being decoded, and the `Imm` parameter is likely an object representing the immediate operand being decoded. The `Address` parameter is likely an object representing the address of the instruction being decoded" LLVM,RISCV,1031,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return decodeSImmOperand < N > ( Inst , Imm , Address , Decoder ) ;` This statement is executed if the `Imm` value is not equal to ``. The `decodeSImmOperand` function is called with the `Inst`, `Imm`, `Address`, and `Decoder` arguments. The `` template parameter is used to specify the type of the `Inst` argument." LLVM,RISCV,1032,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the code depends on the specific values of the input parameters and the implementation of the `decodeUImmNonZeroOperand` function. However, based on the name of the function and the parameters it takes, it is likely that the function is responsible for decoding an immediate operand that is not zero. The function takes an `MCInst` object, a 64-bit immediate value, a 64-bit address, and a pointer to a decoder object as input. It is possible" LLVM,RISCV,1033,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific values of the variables and the implementation of the `MCDisassembler` class. However, based on the code snippet provided, it is likely that the next statement will be: `MCRegister Reg = MCRegister::create(RegNo, );` This is because the `MCDisassembler::Fail` method is called if the `RegNo` variable is greater than or equal to `` or if the `RegNo` variable has" LLVM,RISCV,1034,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the disassembler and the input binary. However, based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the next statement will be a call to the `addOperand` method of the `Inst` object, passing in a new `MCOperand` object created using the `createReg` method and the `Reg` variable. The `createReg` method is likely to create a new register operand with the specified register number. Therefore, the next statement is likely to be" LLVM,RISCV,1035,"The next statement in the code snippet is: `Result = decodeInstruction(DecoderTableRV32Zdinx32, MI, Insn, Address, this, STI);`" LLVM,RISCV,1036,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `if (STI.getFeatureBits()[] && !STI.getFeatureBits()[]) {` This is because the `if` statement is checking if the feature bits of the instruction are set to a specific value, and if the feature bits are not set to that value, it will execute the code inside the `if` statement." LLVM,RISCV,1037,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `Result = decodeInstruction(DecoderTable16, MI, Insn, Address, this, STI);`" LLVM,RISCV,1038,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the program depends on the input data and the specific implementation of the `DecodePulpV2RegisterClass` function. However, based on the name of the function and the parameters it takes, it is likely that the function is responsible for decoding a register class for the PulpV2 instruction set architecture. The function takes four parameters: * `Inst`: a reference to a `MCInst` object, which represents an instruction in the PulpV2 instruction set architecture. * `Reg" LLVM,RISCV,1039,"The next statement of the code snippet is: `return DecodeGPRRegisterClass ( Inst , RegNo , Address , Decoder ) ;` This statement is a return statement, which means that the function `DecodePulpV4RegisterClass` will return the value returned by the function `DecodeGPRRegisterClass`. The function `DecodeGPRRegisterClass` is called with the same arguments as `DecodePulpV4RegisterClass`, except for the first argument `Inst`, which is replaced with the `Inst` argument of `DecodePulpV4RegisterClass`." LLVM,RISCV,1040,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the code depends on the specific values of the variables and the implementation of the `FPR32DecoderTable` array. However, based on the information provided, we can make some educated guesses about the possible next statements. The `FPR32DecoderTable` array is an array of function pointers, and the code is accessing an element of the array using the `RegNo` variable as an index. The `` value is likely a constant value that is used" LLVM,RISCV,1041,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `FPR32DecoderTable` and the `Inst` object. However, based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the next statement would be to add an operand to the `Inst` object using the `addOperand` method. The operand being added is a register, which is obtained from the `FPR32DecoderTable` using the `RegNo` variable." LLVM,RISCV,1042,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `Inst.addOperand(MCOperand::createReg(Reg));` This statement adds an operand to the instruction `Inst`, where the operand is a register that is specified by the `Reg` variable. The `Reg` variable is assigned the value of the `FPR32DecoderTable` array element at the index specified by the `RegNo` variable." LLVM,RISCV,1043,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `MCDisassembler` class and the values of the variables involved. However, based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the next statement will be: `Inst.addOperand(MCOperand::createReg(Reg));` This statement adds an operand to the instruction being disassembled, where the operand is a register that is specified by the `Reg` variable. The `Reg` variable is set to the value of the `F" LLVM,RISCV,1044,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return MCDisassembler::Fail;` Explanation: The code snippet is a part of a function that decodes a 64-bit floating-point register class. The function takes four arguments: `Inst`, `RegNo`, `Address`, and `Decoder`. It first checks if the register number (`RegNo`) is greater than a certain value (represented by ``). If it is, the function returns `MCDisassembler::Fail`. If the register number is not greater than" LLVM,RISCV,1045,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be: `Inst.setRegister(RegNo, FPR64DecoderTable[RegNo]);` This statement is setting the register field of the `Inst` object to the value of the `FPR64DecoderTable` array at the index specified by `RegNo`. The `array_lengthof` function is used to check if the `RegNo` is within the bounds of the `FPR64DecoderTable` array, and if it is not, the `Fail` method is called to indicate that the instruction" LLVM,RISCV,1046,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `Inst` and `MCDisassembler` classes. However, based on the code snippet provided, it is likely that the next statement will be a call to the `Inst::addOperand` method, passing in a new `MCOperand` object created using the `MCOperand::createReg` method. The `MCOperand::createReg` method is likely to create a new `MCOperand` object representing a register operand, and the `" LLVM,RISCV,1047,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the code depends on the input parameters and the specific implementation of the `DecodeGPRCRegisterClass` function. However, based on the name of the function and the parameters it takes, it is likely that the function is responsible for decoding a register class for a General Purpose Register (GPR) in a computer architecture. The `MCInst` parameter is likely an instance of a class that represents a machine instruction, and the `RegNo` parameter is likely an integer that represents the register number. The" LLVM,RISCV,1048,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `Inst.addOperand(MCOperand::createReg(Reg));` This statement adds an operand to the instruction, which is a register operand. The register operand is created using the `MCOperand::createReg` function, which takes a register number as an argument. The register number is obtained from the `VRDecoderTable` array, which is indexed by the `RegNo` variable." LLVM,RISCV,1049,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `Result = decodeInstruction(DecoderTable32, MI, Insn, Address, this, STI);` This is because the `if` statement that precedes it checks whether the `ISA` field of the `STI` object is equal to `X86::ISA_32`, and if it is, it executes the code inside the `if` statement, which includes the `Result = decodeInstruction(DecoderTable32, MI, Insn, Address, this, STI);` statement." LLVM,RISCV,1050,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `Inst.addOperand(MCOperand::createReg(Reg));` This statement adds an operand to the instruction, where the operand is a register. The register is obtained from the `GPRDecoderTable` array using the `RegNo` variable as the index." LLVM,RISCV,1051,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `Inst.addOperand(MCOperand::createReg(Reg));` This statement adds an operand to the instruction, where the operand is a register specified by the `Reg` variable. The `MCOperand::createReg` function is used to create a new register operand with the specified register number." LLVM,RISCV,1052,"The next statement after the `if` block is: `DecodeGPRRegisterClass(Inst, , Address, Decoder);` This statement is executed if the condition in the `if` block is true, which means that the opcode of the instruction is one of the following: * `` * `` * `` * `` * `` * `` * `` * `<" LLVM,RISCV,1053,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the `decodeCLUIImmOperand` function is not specified. However, based on the name of the function and the parameters it takes, it is likely that the function is responsible for decoding an immediate operand for a CLUI instruction. The `MCInst` parameter is likely a reference to the instruction being decoded, and the `Imm` parameter is the immediate value being decoded. The `Address` parameter is likely the address of the instruction being decoded, and the `Decoder" LLVM,RISCV,1054,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the code depends on the specific values of the variables and the implementation of the `MCRegister` class. However, based on the syntax and the fact that the code is using the `+` operator, it is likely that the next statement will be an assignment to a variable or a property of the `MCRegister` class. The value being assigned will be the result of the addition of the string literal and the value of the `RegNo` variable. Without more information about the context and the implementation" LLVM,RISCV,1055,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific values of the variables and the logic of the program. However, based on the code snippet provided, it is likely that the next statement will be: `return MCDisassembler :: Fail ;` This is because the `if` statement checks if the value of `RegNo` is greater than or equal to ``, and if it is, it returns `MCDisassembler :: Fail`. If the value of `RegNo` is less than ` + RegNo;`. LLVM,RISCV,1059,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific values of the variables and the logic of the program. However, based on the code snippet provided, it is likely that the next statement will be: `return MCDisassembler :: Fail ;` This is because the `if` statement checks if the value of `RegNo` is greater than or equal to ``, and if it is, it returns `MCDisassembler :: Fail`. If the value of `RegNo` is less than ``, and if it is, it returns `MCDisassembler :: Fail`. If the value of `RegNo` is less than ``) or if `RegNo` has a certain bit set (represented by ``). If either of these conditions is true, the function returns a value" LLVM,RISCV,1068,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be: `Inst.setRegister(RegNo);` This is because the `DecodeGPRPF64RegisterClass` function is responsible for decoding the register number for a general-purpose register in the x86-64 instruction set. The `RegNo` parameter is the register number being decoded, and the `Inst` parameter is the instruction being disassembled. The `if` statement in the code snippet checks whether the register number is valid (i.e., less than the number of general-pur" LLVM,RISCV,1069,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific values of the variables and the behavior of the functions being called. However, based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the next statement will be: `MCRegister Reg = + RegNo;` This statement assigns a value to the variable `Reg`, which is a register number. The value is determined by the expression ` + RegNo`, which concatenates the string literal `` with the register number `RegNo`." LLVM,RISCV,1070,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the code depends on the input values and the specific implementation of the `decodeRVCInstrRdRs1Rs2` function. However, based on the name of the function and the parameters it takes, it is likely that the function is responsible for decoding a RISC-V instruction that has a destination register (Rd), a source register (Rs1), and another source register (Rs2). The function appears to be part of a disassembler or decompiler" LLVM,RISCV,1071,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `Inst.addOperand(Inst.getOperand());` This statement adds an operand to the `Inst` object, which is an instance of the `MCInst` class. The operand is retrieved from the `Inst` object using the `getOperand` method, and the `addOperand` method is used to add it to the `Inst` object. The operand is identified by the `` placeholder, which is a number that represents the operand's position in" LLVM,RISCV,1072,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be: `Inst.addOperand(MCOperand::createReg(Rd));` This is because the `decodeRVCInstrRdRs2` function is decoding a RISC-V instruction with a register destination (Rd) and a register source (Rs2), and the next step is to add the register operand for the destination register (Rd) to the `MCInst` object. The `MCOperand::createReg` function is used to create a register operand, and" LLVM,RISCV,1073,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return MCDisassembler::Success;` This is because the `assert` statement is only executed if the `Result` variable is equal to `MCDisassembler::Success`, which means that the `decodeSImmOperand` function was successful. If the `decodeSImmOperand` function was not successful, the `assert` statement would not be executed, and the function would return `MCDisassembler::Failure` instead." LLVM,RISCV,1074,"The next statement of this code snippet is: uint64_t SImm6 = fieldFromInstruction(Insn, , ) << | fieldFromInstruction(Insn, , ); This statement is a bitwise OR operation between two values, where the first value is a 64-bit unsigned integer and the second value is a 64-bit unsigned integer that is shifted left by a certain number of bits. The resulting value is then" LLVM,RISCV,1075,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return decodeSImmOperand < N > ( Inst , Imm , Address , Decoder ) ;` This statement is executed if the `Imm` value is not equal to ``. It calls the `decodeSImmOperand` function with the `Inst`, `Imm`, `Address`, and `Decoder` parameters, and returns the result of the function call." LLVM,RISCV,1076,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet without knowing the context and the values of the variables involved. However, based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the `if` statement is checking if the value of `Imm` is equal to a specific value, which is represented by the placeholder ``. If this condition is true, the function `MCDisassembler :: Fail` is called and the function returns. Therefore, the next statement of this code snippet would likely be the call to the `MCDisassembler :: Fail` function, which is" LLVM,RISCV,1077,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be the call to the `addImplySP` function, which is used to add an implied stack pointer operand to the instruction. The `addImplySP` function takes four arguments: the instruction, the address of the instruction, the decoder, and a boolean value indicating whether the stack pointer should be added as an implied operand. The `assert` statement in the code snippet is used to check that the immediate value `Imm` is within the range of a signed integer of the appropriate size (i.e., `N` bits" LLVM,RISCV,1078,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific context and the intended behavior of the code. However, based on the information provided, it appears that the code is adding an immediate operand to an instruction using the `addOperand` method. The operand is created using the `createImm` method, which takes an immediate value as an argument. The immediate value is created by shifting the `Imm` value left by `NUM_LIT` bits, and then sign-extending it to 64 bits. Therefore," LLVM,RISCV,1079,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific context and the intended behavior of the code. However, based on the information provided, it appears that the code is adding an immediate operand to an instruction using the `addOperand` method. The operand is created using the `createImm` method, which takes an immediate value as an argument. The immediate value is created by shifting the `Imm` value left by `NUM_LIT` bits, and then sign-extending it to 64 bits. Therefore," LLVM,RISCV,1080,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the `decodeUImmOperand` function is not known. However, based on the name of the function and the parameters passed to it, it is likely that the function is responsible for decoding an immediate operand in the instruction. The `Inst` parameter is likely to be a reference to the instruction being decoded, while the `Imm` parameter is likely to be a reference to the immediate operand being decoded. The `Address` parameter is likely to be the address of the instruction being" LLVM,RISCV,1081,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be: `Inst.setOpcode(ARM64_INS_MOV);`. This is because the `decodeUImmNonZeroOperand` function is responsible for decoding the immediate operand of an ARM64 instruction, and the `setOpcode` method is used to set the opcode of the instruction to the appropriate value based on the immediate operand. The `` value is likely to be a constant that represents the immediate operand value, and the `Fail` method is used to" LLVM,RISCV,1082,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `Inst.addOperand(MCOperand::createImm(Imm));` This statement adds an immediate operand to the `Inst` object, which is an instance of the `MCInst` class. The immediate operand is created using the `MCOperand::createImm` method, which takes an integer value as its argument. In this case, the value of the immediate operand is `Imm`, which is a 64-bit integer value." LLVM,RISCV,1083,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be: `Inst.addOperand(MCOperand::createReg(Reg));` This is because the previous statement in the code snippet is `MCRegister Reg = RI->getMatchingSuperReg( + RegNo, , &MCRegisterClasses[]);`, which assigns a value to the `Reg` variable. The next statement is then likely to be an operation that uses this value, such as adding it as" LLVM,RISCV,1084,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the disassembler and the input instructions. However, based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the next statement will be an addition operation, possibly adding the value of the `Reg` variable to a register or memory location. The `MCOperand::createReg` function is used to create a new register operand, and the `Inst::addOperand` function is used to add the operand to the instruction. The `MCDisassembler::Success` value" LLVM,RISCV,1085,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be: `Inst.addOperand(MCOperand::createReg(Reg));` This is because the previous statement in the code snippet is `MCRegister Reg = RI->getMatchingSuperReg( + RegNo, , &MCRegisterClasses[]);`, which assigns a value to the variable `Reg`. The next statement is likely to be an operation that uses this value, such as adding it as an oper" LLVM,RISCV,1086,"Based on the code snippet you provided, it appears to be a part of a disassembler for a specific instruction set architecture (ISA). The code is checking if the register number is valid and if it is a super register. If the register is not valid or not a super register, it returns an error. The next statement of this code snippet would likely be a check to see if the register is a sub-register, and if so, return the corresponding super register. If the register is not a sub-register, it would likely return the register itself. Here is a possible next statement:" LLVM,RISCV,1087,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific values of the variables and the implementation of the `MCDisassembler` class. However, based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the next statement will be a call to the `getRegisterInfo` method of the `MCRegisterInfo` class, which is likely to return a pointer to a register info object. The `getRegisterInfo` method is called on the `MCRegisterInfo` object returned by the `getContext` method of the `MCDisassembler` class." LLVM,RISCV,1088,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `Inst.addOperand(MCOperand::createReg(Reg));` This statement adds an operand to the instruction, where the operand is a register. The register is created using the `MCOperand::createReg` function, which takes a register number as an argument. The register number is obtained from the `RegNo` variable, which is initialized to `` in the previous line of the code snippet." LLVM,RISCV,1089,"Based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the next statement will be: `DecodeGPRRegisterClass(Inst, , Address, Decoder);` This is because the `if` statement checks if the opcode of the instruction is equal to one of the specified string literals, and if it is, it calls the `DecodeGPRRegisterClass` function with the instruction, a numerical literal, the address, and the decoder. If the opcode is not equal to any of the specified string literals, the `if` statement will not be executed," LLVM,RISCV,1090,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return new MCDisassembler(T, STI, Ctx);`" LLVM,RISCV,1091,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be a call to the constructor of the `MCDisassembler` class, passing in the `STI` and `Ctx` objects as arguments. The constructor is expected to return a pointer to a new `MCDisassembler` object, which is then returned from the `create` function. Here is an example of what the next statement might look like: ``` MCDisassembler *disassembler = new MCDisassembler(STI, Ctx); ``` This statement creates a new `MCDis" LLVM,RISCV,1092,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet without knowing the specific values of the variables and constants used in the code. However, based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the code is checking if the value of `Imm` is greater than a certain value (represented by ``). If `Imm` is greater than this value, the code is setting `Imm` to a new value that is the result of a bitwise AND operation between `SignExtend64` and `Imm`. Assuming that `SignExtend64`" LLVM,RISCV,1093,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific values of the variables and the behavior of the functions being called. However, based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the next statement will be: `Inst.addOperand(MCOperand::createImm(Imm));` This statement adds an immediate operand to the instruction being disassembled, using the value of `Imm` as the operand value. The `MCOperand::createImm` function is used to create the immediate operand" LLVM,RISCV,1094,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `Inst.addOperand(MCOperand::createReg(Reg));` This statement adds an operand to the instruction, where the operand is a register. The register is specified by the `Reg` variable, which is set to the value of the `RegNo` variable plus the value of the `` constant. The `MCOperand::createReg` function is used to create a new operand object, and the `Inst.addOperand` method is used to add the operand to the instruction" LLVM,RISCV,1095,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `Inst.addOperand(MCOperand::createReg(Reg));` This statement adds an operand to the `Inst` object, which is an instance of the `MCInst` class. The operand is created using the `MCOperand::createReg` method, which takes a register number as an argument. In this case, the register number is stored in the `Reg` variable, which is assigned the value of `FPR32DecoderTable[RegNo]` in the previous line of code." LLVM,RISCV,1096,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `Inst.addOperand(MCOperand::createReg(Reg));` This statement adds a register operand to the `Inst` object, using the `MCOperand::createReg` function to create a new register operand with the value of `Reg`. The `Reg` variable is assigned the value of `FPR64DecoderTable[RegNo + ]` in the previous line of code, so this statement adds a register operand to the `Inst` object with the value of `Reg" LLVM,RISCV,1097,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be: `Inst.setOperand(0, MCOperand::createReg(RegNo));` This is because the `DecodeFPR64CRegisterClass` function is responsible for decoding the FPR64C register class, which is a set of registers that are used to store floating-point values. The `RegNo` parameter is the number of the register being decoded, and the `Address` parameter is the address of the instruction being decoded. The `if` statement checks if the `Reg" LLVM,RISCV,1098,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return MCDisassembler :: Fail;` This is because the `if` statement checks if `RegNo` is greater than the size of the `FPR64DecoderTable`, and if it is, it returns `MCDisassembler :: Fail`. If `RegNo` is not greater than the size of the table, then the next statement would be `unsigned Reg = FPR64DecoderTable [ RegNo ] ;`." LLVM,RISCV,1099,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `Inst.addOperand(MCOperand::createReg(Reg));` This statement adds an operand to the instruction, where the operand is a register that is determined by the value of `RegNo`. The value of `RegNo` is used as an index into the `FPR64DecoderTable` array, and the corresponding register value is retrieved and stored in the `Reg` variable. The `MCOperand::createReg` function is then called to create a new operand that represents the register, and this" LLVM,RISCV,1100,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `Inst.setFRM(Imm);` Explanation: The `decodeFRMArg` function is called with the `Inst` object, the `Imm` immediate value, the `Address` of the instruction, and the `Decoder` object. The function asserts that the `Imm` value is within the range of the `NUM_LIT` literal and that the `STR_LIT` literal is non-empty. If the assertion fails, the function will not execute any further. The next" LLVM,RISCV,1101,"The next statement after the code snippet you provided is likely to be a continuation of the current statement, possibly with a new assertion or a call to a function that performs some operation based on the values of `isUInt` and `Imm`. Without more context, it's difficult to provide a more specific prediction. If you have any additional information or context about the code you're working with, I may be able to provide a more accurate prediction." LLVM,RISCV,1102,"It is difficult to predict the next statement with certainty, as it depends on the specific values of the variables and the implementation of the `MCDisassembler` class. However, based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the next statement will be: `Reg = GPRDecoderTable[RegNo + ];` This statement is assigning the value of the `GPRDecoderTable` element at the index `RegNo + ` to the variable `Reg`." LLVM,RISCV,1103,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the value of `RegNo` is not known. However, based on the code snippet, it appears that `RegNo` is an index into an array called `GPRDecoderTable`, and the value stored at that index is being assigned to the variable `Reg`. Therefore, the next statement of this code snippet could be any of the following: * `Reg = GPRDecoderTable[RegNo + ];` * `Reg = GPRDecoderTable[" LLVM,RISCV,1104,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of the code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `DecodeGPRRegisterClass` function and the values of the input parameters `Inst`, `RegNo`, `Address`, and `Decoder`. However, based on the name of the function and the parameters, it is likely that the next statement will be a call to the `DecodeGPRRegisterClass` function, which will decode the general-purpose register class for the instruction. The function will likely return a value that represents the decoded register class, which will be used" LLVM,RISCV,1105,"The next statement of the code snippet is: `return MCDisassembler::Fail;` This is because the `if` statement checks if `RegNo` is equal to ``, and if it is, it returns `MCDisassembler::Fail`. If `RegNo` is not equal to ``, the code will continue to the next statement, which is the `return` statement." LLVM,RISCV,1106,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the `DecodeGPRNoX0X2RegisterClass` function depends on the specific implementation of the `MCInst` class and the `Decoder` object. However, based on the name of the function and the parameters it takes, it is likely that the function is responsible for decoding a register class for a general-purpose register (GPR) and returning a `DecodeStatus` value indicating the result of the decoding process. The function takes three parameters: *" LLVM,RISCV,1107,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be: `Inst.addOperand(MCOperand::createImm(Reg));` This is because the `addOperand` method is called with a `MCOperand` object that is created using the `createImm` method, which creates an immediate operand. The `Reg` variable is passed as an argument to the `createImm` method, which means that the immediate operand will have the same value as the `Reg` variable. It's worth noting that the `addOperand" LLVM,RISCV,1108,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `Inst.addOperand(MCOperand::createReg(Reg));` This statement adds an operand to the instruction, where the operand is a register. The register is obtained from the `GPRDecoderTable` array using the `RegNo` index. The `MCOperand::createReg` function is used to create a new operand that represents the register." LLVM,RISCV,1109,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the code depends on the specific values of the input parameters and the implementation of the `decodeSImmOperand` function. However, based on the name of the function and the parameters it takes, it is likely that the function is responsible for decoding a signed immediate operand and returning a `DecodeStatus` value indicating the result of the decoding process. The function may use the `MCInst` object to store the decoded operand and the `Imm` and `Address` parameters to determine the" LLVM,RISCV,1110,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet without knowing the context and the purpose of the code. However, based on the syntax and the names of the functions and variables used, it appears that the code is related to the manipulation of machine code instructions and operands. The `Inst` object is being used to add an operand to the instruction, and the `MCOperand` class is being used to create an immediate operand. The `createImm` function is being used to create an immediate value, and the `SignExtend64` function is being used to sign" LLVM,RISCV,1111,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific context and the intended behavior of the code. However, based on the information provided, it appears that the code is adding an immediate operand to an instruction using the `addOperand` method. The operand is created using the `createImm` method, which takes an immediate value as an argument. The immediate value is created by shifting the `Imm` value left by `NUM_LIT` bits, and then sign-extending it to 64 bits. Therefore," LLVM,RISCV,1112,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the code depends on the specific values of the input parameters and the implementation of the `decodeUImmOperand` function. However, based on the name of the function and the parameters it takes, it is likely that the function is responsible for decoding an immediate operand for an instruction, and the next statement of the code snippet is likely to be a call to the `decodeUImmOperand` function." LLVM,RISCV,1113,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `Size = ;` This statement is executed if the size of the input bytes is less than ``. It sets the `Size` variable to ``, which is the size of the instruction being decoded." LLVM,RISCV,1114,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `TargetRegistry` class and the `RegisterMCDisassembler` method. However, based on the information provided, it is likely that the next statement will be a call to the `RegisterMCDisassembler` method, passing in the result of the `getThe64Target` method and the `createDisassembler` method as arguments. The `getThe" LLVM,RISCV,1115,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be the initialization of the `MCDisassembler` object with the given subtarget information and context. Here's a breakdown of the code snippet: * `ISA_LIT` is a macro that expands to the name of the instruction set architecture (ISA) being targeted. * `Disassembler` is the name of the class being defined. * `MCSubtargetInfo` is a class that provides information about the subtarget (i.e., the specific microarchitecture) being targeted." LLVM,RISCV,1116,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be the initialization of the `MCDisassembler` object with the given subtarget information and context. Here's a breakdown of the code snippet: * `ISA_LIT` is a macro that expands to the name of the instruction set architecture (ISA) being targeted. * `Disassembler` is the name of the class being defined. * `MCSubtargetInfo` is a class that provides information about the subtarget (i.e., the specific microarchitecture) being targeted." LLVM,RISCV,1117,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet without knowing the specific values of the variables and the implementation of the `ELF` class. However, based on the code snippet, it appears that the next statement will be a `return` statement, as the previous `case` statements all end with a `return` statement. The next `case` statement is `case :`, which suggests that the next statement will be a `return` statement that returns a value of type `ELF::R__`. However," LLVM,RISCV,1118,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be the initialization of the `MCELFObjectTargetWriter` object, which is the parent class of `ELFObjectWriter`. The constructor of `MCELFObjectTargetWriter` takes three arguments: `Is64Bit`, `OSABI`, and `ELF::EM_`. Therefore, the next statement of this code snippet is likely to be: ``` MCELFObjectTargetWriter(Is64Bit, OSABI, ELF::EM_`. Therefore, the next statement of this code snippet is likely to be: ``` MCELFObjectTargetWriter(Is64Bit, OSABI, ELF::EM_ : return ELF :: R__HI20 ; This is because the switch statement is checking the value of the Kind variable, and the next case after the default case is the one where Kind is equal to ." LLVM,RISCV,1123,"Based on the code snippet you provided, it seems that the next statement will be: `case : return ELF :: R__TPREL_ADD ;` This is because the previous case statement is checking for the `FK_Data_8` kind, and since the current kind is not `FK_Data_8`, the next case statement that matches the current kind will be executed." LLVM,RISCV,1124,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be the return statement, which returns the result of the `createELFObjectWriter` function. The `createELFObjectWriter` function is called with three arguments: * `llvm::make_uniqueELFObjectWriter>`: This is a unique pointer to an `ISA_LIT` object, which is a subclass of `ELFObjectWriter`. The `make_unique` function is used to create a unique pointer to the `ISA_LIT` object. * `OSAB" LLVM,RISCV,1125,"Based on the code snippet you provided, it seems like the next statement would be: case : return ELF :: R__JALR ; This is because the previous cases all have a similar structure, with the only difference being the value of the placeholder. The next case appears to be following the same pattern, with the only difference being the value of the placeholder." LLVM,RISCV,1126,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `MCObjectWriter *llvm::createELFObjectWriter(raw_pwrite_stream &OS, uint8_t OSABI, bool Is64Bit) {` This statement creates a new `MCObjectWriter` object and initializes it with the given parameters. The `ISA_LIT` template parameter is used to specify the instruction set architecture (ISA) of the object writer. The `OS` parameter is a reference to a `raw_pwrite_stream` object, which" LLVM,RISCV,1127,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `getRelocType` method and the values of the input parameters. However, based on the name of the method and the parameters, it appears that the method is determining the type of relocation to be used for a given target and fixup. The `getRelocType` method is called with a `MCContext` object, which represents the current assembly context, and a `MCValue` object, which represents the target of the relocation. The method also takes a `" LLVM,RISCV,1128,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be the initialization of the `MCELFObjectTargetWriter` object, which is the parent class of `ELFObjectWriter`. The constructor of `MCELFObjectTargetWriter` takes three arguments: `Is64Bit`, `OSABI`, and `ELF::EM_`. Therefore, the next statement of this code snippet is likely to be: ``` MCELFObjectTargetWriter(Is64Bit, OSABI, ELF::EM_`. Therefore, the next statement of this code snippet is likely to be: ``` MCELFObjectTargetWriter(Is64Bit, OSABI, ELF::EM_ : return ELF :: R__TPREL_LO12_S ;" LLVM,RISCV,1133,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet without knowing the values of the variables and the specific implementation of the `ELF` class. However, based on the syntax and the context, it appears that the code is defining a `switch` statement with a number of `case` labels that return different values based on the value of the `FK_Data_Sub` variable. The `FK_Data_Sub` variable is likely an enumeration that represents different types of data sub-fields in an ELF file. The `case` labels in the `switch` statement are checking the" LLVM,RISCV,1134,"The next statement of the code snippet is: `case FK_Data_4: return ELF::R__32;` This is a `case` statement that handles the case where the `Kind` variable is equal to `FK_Data_4`. In this case, the function returns the value `ELF::R__32`." LLVM,RISCV,1135,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `case FK_Data_1:` This is because the `switch` statement is checking the value of `Kind`, and the next value of `Kind` after `default` is `FK_Data_1`." LLVM,RISCV,1136,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `case FK_Data_8 : return ELF :: R__64 ;`" LLVM,RISCV,1137,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet without knowing the specific values of the variables and the behavior of the functions being called. However, based on the syntax and the context, it appears that the code is using the `llvm_unreachable` function to indicate that the default case is unreachable, and then it is returning a value based on the value of the `FK` variable. The `FK` variable is being compared to a series of constants, and the return value is being set based on the value of `FK`. The constants being compared to `" LLVM,RISCV,1138,"Based on the code snippet you provided, it appears to be a part of a function that is handling relocations for a specific instruction set architecture (ISA). The function is using a `switch` statement to handle different types of relocations based on the value of `Fixup.getKind()`. The `default` case in the `switch` statement is calling the `llvm_unreachable` function, which is likely a macro that is used to indicate that the code should not be reached. This is likely because the `switch` statement should cover all possible values of `Fixup" LLVM,RISCV,1139,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it appears to be part of a larger function and the context is not provided. However, based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the function is trying to map a relocation kind to an ELF relocation type. The function takes a relocation kind as input and returns the corresponding ELF relocation type. The relocation kind is represented by an enumeration value, and the function uses a switch statement to map the relocation kind to the appropriate ELF relocation type. The function first checks if the re" LLVM,RISCV,1140,"The next statement after the code snippet you provided is likely to be a call to the `write` method of the `ELFObjectWriter` object that was just created. The `write` method is responsible for writing the contents of the ELF object to the output file. Here's an example of what the next statement might look like: ``` writer->write(elf_object); ``` This statement calls the `write` method on the `writer` object, passing in the `elf_object` as an argument. The `write` method will then write the contents of the `elf" LLVM,RISCV,1141,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet as it appears to be a part of a larger function and the context is not provided. However, based on the information provided, it seems that the code is trying to determine the type of relocation to use for a given fixup. The function appears to be using a switch statement to check the kind of fixup and return the appropriate relocation type. The function is using a number of constants and macros, such as `FK_Data_1`, `FK_Data_2`, `FK_Data_4`, `FK" LLVM,RISCV,1142,"The next statement in the code snippet is: Result += item.StringValue.size() + ; This statement is part of the case AttributeType::Text block, and it adds the size of the string value of the item to the result. The placeholder is a literal value that represents the number of bytes in the string value." LLVM,RISCV,1143,"The next statement of this code snippet is: return S;" LLVM,RISCV,1144,"The next statement after `setAttributeItem(Attribute, Value, true)` would be: `setAttributeItem(Attribute, Value, false)` This is because the `setAttributeItem` method is called with the same arguments as before, but with the `force` parameter set to `false` instead of `true`. This means that the attribute will not be set if it already exists on the element." LLVM,RISCV,1145,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be the implementation of the `emitDirectiveOptionNoPIC` method, which is a member function of the `TargetELFStreamer` class. The method is called when the assembler encounters the `.option no pic` directive in the assembly code. The implementation of this method is likely to set a flag or variable that indicates that the code should be generated without position-independent code (PIC), which means that the code can be loaded at any address and still function correctly. The method may also perform other tasks related to generating code that is" LLVM,RISCV,1146,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be the implementation of the `emitDirectiveOptionNoPIC` method, which is a member function of the `TargetELFStreamer` class. The method is called when the assembler encounters the `.option no pic` directive in the assembly code. The implementation of this method is likely to set a flag or variable that indicates that the code should be generated without position-independent code (PIC), which means that the code can be loaded at any address and still function correctly. The method may also perform other tasks related to generating code that is" LLVM,RISCV,1147,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be the implementation of the `emitDirectiveOptionNoRelax` method, which is a member function of the `TargetELFStreamer` class. The method is called when the assembler encounters the `.option no-relax` directive in the assembly code. The implementation of this method is not provided in the code snippet, so it is not possible to predict exactly what it will do. However, based on the name of the method and the directive it is associated with, it is likely that the method will set a flag or option in the assembler" LLVM,RISCV,1148,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be the implementation of the `emitDirectiveOptionNoRelax` method, which is a member function of the `TargetELFStreamer` class. The method is called when the assembler encounters the `.option no-relax` directive in the assembly code. The implementation of this method is not provided in the code snippet, so it is not possible to predict exactly what it will do. However, based on the name of the method and the directive it is associated with, it is likely that the method will set a flag or option in the assembler" LLVM,RISCV,1149,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `emitDirectiveOptionNoRVC(this);` This statement calls the `emitDirectiveOptionNoRVC` method on the `TargetELFStreamer` object, passing `this` as the first argument. The `emitDirectiveOptionNoRVC` method is responsible for emitting the `.option no-rvc` directive in the output file." LLVM,RISCV,1150,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `emitDirectiveOptionNoRVC(this);` This statement calls the `emitDirectiveOptionNoRVC` method on the `TargetELFStreamer` object, passing `this` as the first argument. The `emitDirectiveOptionNoRVC` method is responsible for emitting the `.option no-rvc` directive in the output file." LLVM,RISCV,1151,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `emitDirectiveOptionPIC` method and the context in which it is called. However, based on the name of the method and the fact that it is part of a streamer for the ELF file format, it is likely that the next statement will be related to emitting an option for position-independent code (PIC) in the ELF file. This could involve setting a flag or writing a specific value to the ELF file to indicate that PIC code should be generated." LLVM,RISCV,1152,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `emitDirectiveOptionPIC` method and the context in which it is called. However, based on the name of the method and the fact that it is part of a streamer for the ELF file format, it is likely that the next statement will be related to emitting an option for position-independent code (PIC) in the ELF file. This could involve setting a flag or writing a specific value to the ELF file to indicate that PIC code should be generated." LLVM,RISCV,1153,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `emitDirectiveOptionPop` method and the context in which it is called. However, based on the name of the method and the fact that it is part of an `TargetELFStreamer` class, it is likely that the next statement will be related to emitting an option pop directive for an ELF file. Some possible next statements could include: * `emit("".option_pop"");` * `emit("".pop"");` * `emit("".option_" LLVM,RISCV,1154,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `emitDirectiveOptionPop` method and the context in which it is called. However, based on the name of the method and the fact that it is part of an `TargetELFStreamer` class, it is likely that the next statement will be related to emitting an option pop directive for an ELF file. Some possible next statements could include: * `emit("".option_pop"");` * `emit("".pop"");` * `emit("".option_" LLVM,RISCV,1155,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `emitDirectiveOptionPush` method and the context in which it is called. However, based on the name of the method and the fact that it is part of an `ISA_LIT` class, it is likely that the next statement will be related to emitting an option push directive for an ELF file. Here are a few possibilities for what the next statement could be: 1. `emitDirectiveOptionPush(""-O2"");` - This would emit" LLVM,RISCV,1156,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `emitDirectiveOptionPush` method and the context in which it is called. However, based on the name of the method and the fact that it is part of an `ISA_LIT` class, it is likely that the next statement will be related to emitting an option push directive for an ELF file. Here are a few possibilities for what the next statement could be: 1. `emitDirectiveOptionPush(""-O2"");` - This would emit" LLVM,RISCV,1157,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `emitDirectiveOptionRelax` method and the context in which it is being called. However, based on the name of the method and the fact that it is a member of the `TargetELFStreamer` class, it is likely that the next statement will be related to the emission of an option relax directive for an ELF file. Without more information about the specific implementation of the `emitDirectiveOptionRelax` method, it is not possible to provide a more specific" LLVM,RISCV,1158,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `emitDirectiveOptionRelax` method and the context in which it is being called. However, based on the name of the method and the fact that it is a member of the `TargetELFStreamer` class, it is likely that the next statement will be related to the emission of an option relax directive for an ELF file. Without more information about the specific implementation of the `emitDirectiveOptionRelax` method, it is not possible to provide a more specific" LLVM,RISCV,1159,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `emitDirectiveOptionRVC` method and the context in which it is being called. However, based on the name of the method and the fact that it is part of a class called `TargetELFStreamer`, it is likely that the next statement will be related to emitting an option for the RISC-V instruction set architecture (RVC) in an ELF file." LLVM,RISCV,1160,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `emitDirectiveOptionRVC` method and the context in which it is being called. However, based on the name of the method and the fact that it is part of a class called `TargetELFStreamer`, it is likely that the next statement will be related to emitting an option for the RISC-V instruction set architecture (RVC) in an ELF file." LLVM,RISCV,1161,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `DF->getFixups()->push_back(MCFixup::create(DF->getContents()->size(), A, static_cast(Sub), Loc));` Explanation: The code snippet is creating a new `MCFixup` object and adding it to the `DF->getFixups()` list. The `MCFixup::create()` method is called with the following arguments: * `DF->getContents()->size()`: This is the size of the data" LLVM,RISCV,1162,"The next statement after the given code snippet is: `DF->getFixups()->push_back(MCFixup::create(DF->getContents()->size(), C, static_cast(Add), Loc));` This statement is adding a new fixup to the list of fixups for the data fragment `DF`. The fixup is created using the `MCFixup::create` method, which takes the size of the data fragment's contents, a value to be added or subtracted, a fixup kind (in this case, `Add" LLVM,RISCV,1163,"The next statement in the code snippet is: `case : EFlags |= ELF :: EF__FLOAT_ABI_SINGLE ; break ;` This is because the `switch` statement is checking the value of `EFlags` and executing the corresponding `case` statement. The value of `EFlags` is set to `ELF :: EF__FLOAT_ABI_SINGLE` in the previous statement, so the next `case` statement that" LLVM,RISCV,1164,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific inputs and the behavior of the `llvm_unreachable` function. However, based on the code snippet, it appears that the `llvm_unreachable` function is called when the `item.Type` is not one of the expected values. Assuming that the `llvm_unreachable` function is not called, the next statement would be the `Contents.clear()` statement, which clears the contents of the `Contents` object." LLVM,RISCV,1165,"The next statement is: Streamer.emitInt8();" LLVM,RISCV,1166,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific values of the placeholders and the context in which the code is being executed. However, based on the syntax and the fact that the code is using the `std::make_pair` function, it is likely that the next statement will be a call to `std::make_pair` with two string literals as arguments, similar to the previous two statements. For example, the next statement could be: ``` return std::make_pair(""hello"", ""world""); ``` Al" LLVM,RISCV,1167,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty because the behavior of the `llvm_unreachable` function is not specified. The `llvm_unreachable` function is a special function in LLVM that is used to indicate that a particular code path is unreachable. It is typically used in situations where the compiler can prove that a certain branch of code is never executed, and it is used to help the compiler optimize the code. In this code snippet, the `llvm_unreachable` function is being called with a" LLVM,RISCV,1168,"The next statement of the code snippet is: RHS = MCBinaryExpr::create(MCBinaryExpr::Add, MCSymbolRefExpr::create(&B, C), MCConstantExpr::create(E.getConstant(), C), C);" LLVM,RISCV,1169,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific values of the variables and the behavior of the functions called. However, based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the next statement will be a comparison between the values of `A` and `B`. The code snippet is creating a binary expression with the `Add` operator, where the left-hand side (LHS) is a symbolic expression representing the sum of two symbols, and the right-hand side (RHS) is a symbolic expression representing a constant. The `create` function" LLVM,RISCV,1170,"The next statement after the code snippet you provided is: `MCELFStreamer::reset();`. This is because the `static_cast` operator is used to cast the result of the `getTargetStreamer()` function to a pointer to a `TargetStreamer` object, and then the `reset()` method is called on that object. The `MCELFStreamer` class is a subclass of `TargetStreamer`, so the `reset()` method is inherited from the `TargetStreamer` class and can be called on an object of type `MCELFStreamer" LLVM,RISCV,1171,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be the body of the `reset()` method, which is not provided in the code snippet. Based on the syntax and the fact that the method is marked with the `override` keyword, it is likely that the `reset()` method is intended to override a method with the same name and signature in a base class or interface. Therefore, the next statement of this code snippet is likely to be the first line of the `reset()` method, which may be something like: ``` this.someProperty = someValue; ``` or" LLVM,RISCV,1172,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be the initialization of the `MCAsmBackend`, `MCObjectWriter`, and `MCCodeEmitter` objects using the `std::move` function. Here's the predicted next statement: ``` MCAsmBackend *MAB = new MCAsmBackend(C); MCObjectWriter *MOW = new MCObjectWriter(C); MCCodeEmitter *MCE = new MCCodeEmitter(C); ``` This statement creates new instances of the `MCAsmBackend`," LLVM,RISCV,1173,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be the initialization of the `MCAsmBackend`, `MCObjectWriter`, and `MCCodeEmitter` objects using the `std::move` function. Here's the predicted next statement: ``` MCAsmBackend *MAB = new MCAsmBackend(C); MCObjectWriter *MOW = new MCObjectWriter(C); MCCodeEmitter *MCE = new MCCodeEmitter(C); ``` This statement creates new instances of the `MCAsmBackend`," LLVM,RISCV,1174,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `getBackend()` method and the `ISA_LIT` type. However, based on the syntax and the fact that the `getBackend()` method is being called on the `MCA` object, it is likely that the next statement will be a call to a method or function that is defined in the `AsmBackend` class or one of its subclasses." LLVM,RISCV,1175,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty because it depends on the specific values of the variables and the behavior of the functions being called. However, based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the next statement will be a `switch` statement that checks the value of `ABI` and sets `EFlags` accordingly." LLVM,RISCV,1176,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be: `EFlags |= ELF::EF__RVC;` This statement is setting the `EF__RVC` flag in the `EFlags` variable, which is used to indicate that the ELF header has the RVC (RISC-V Compressed) flag set. The `Features` variable is checked to see if the `STR_LIT` feature is enabled, and if it is, the `EF_` placeholder) and, if so, setting the `EFlags` variable to a specific value (represented by the `` placeholder). The `getFeatureBits()` function is called on the `STI` object to retrieve" LLVM,RISCV,1178,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be: `DF->addFixup (CapFixup);` This is because the previous line of code creates a new `MCFixup` object called `CapFixup`, and the next logical step would be to add it to the `MCDataFragment` object `DF`." LLVM,RISCV,1179,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `assert ( CapSize == ( getContext ( ) . getTargetTriple ( ) . isArch64Bit ( ) ? : ) ) ;` This is an assertion statement that checks if the value of `CapSize` is equal to the result of the ternary operator. The ternary operator checks if the target architecture is 64-bit, and if so, returns the value of `NUM_LIT` for the 64-bit architecture, otherwise it returns" LLVM,RISCV,1180,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `TargetELFStreamer` class and the input data being processed. However, based on the name of the method and the context in which it is called, it is likely that the next statement will be related to the emission of an option directive for the capability mode of the target ELF file. This could involve setting a flag or updating a data structure to indicate that the capability mode is being used." LLVM,RISCV,1181,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `TargetELFStreamer` class and the input data being processed. However, based on the name of the method and the context in which it is called, it is likely that the next statement will be related to the emission of an option directive for the capability mode of the target ELF file. This could involve setting a flag or updating a data structure to indicate that the capability mode is being used." LLVM,RISCV,1182,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `TargetELFStreamer` class and the input data being processed. However, based on the name of the method and the context in which it is called, it is likely that the next statement will be related to setting or updating a flag or option related to the generation of ELF files. Some possible next statements could include: * `setOption(Option::NoCapMode, true);` * `setOption(Option::NoCapMode, false);` * `update" LLVM,RISCV,1183,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `TargetELFStreamer` class and the input data being processed. However, based on the name of the method and the context in which it is called, it is likely that the next statement will be related to setting or updating a flag or option related to the generation of ELF files. Some possible next statements could include: * `setOption(Option::NoCapMode, true);` * `setOption(Option::NoCapMode, false);` * `update" LLVM,RISCV,1184,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `MCA.setELFHeaderEFlags(EFlags);`" LLVM,RISCV,1185,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return nullptr;` This is because the `for` loop will continue to iterate through the `Contents` vector until it finds an element with a `Tag` that matches the `Attribute` parameter. If no such element is found, the loop will exit and the function will return `nullptr`." LLVM,RISCV,1186,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `Item->Type = AttributeType::Text;` This statement sets the `Type` member of the `Item` object to `AttributeType::Text`, which is an enumeration value indicating that the attribute is of type text." LLVM,RISCV,1187,"The next statement in this code snippet is: Item->Type = AttributeType::Text;" LLVM,RISCV,1188,"The next statement of this code snippet is: Item -> Type = AttributeType :: NumericAndText ; This statement assigns the value of AttributeType :: NumericAndText to the Type member of the Item object." LLVM,RISCV,1189,"Based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the next statement will be: BuildMI ( LoopMBB , DL , TII -> get ( ) , ScratchReg ) . addReg ( DestReg ) . addReg ( IncrReg ) ; break ; This is because the previous statements in the switch case are all similar, with the only difference being the string literal passed to the TII->get() method. The next statement is simply a continuation of the previous statements, with the same method calls and arguments." LLVM,RISCV,1190,"Based on the code snippet provided, it is difficult to predict the next statement with certainty. However, based on the context and the information provided, it is likely that the next statement will be a case statement that handles the different types of atomic memory operations. The code snippet is from a function that is responsible for generating machine code for a loop that contains an atomic memory operation. The function appears to be using the LLVM API to generate the machine code. The function is taking a loop basic block, a data layout, a target information object, and a loop instruction as input. The function is first extracting" LLVM,RISCV,1191,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet without knowing the context and the specific implementation of the functions being called. However, based on the names of the functions and variables, it appears that this code is related to the expansion of a loop for a masked atomic binary operation. The code snippet appears to be inserting a new basic block (LoopMBB) into the control flow graph, and then adding successors to it and to another basic block (DoneMBB). It also appears to be transferring the successors of another basic block (MBB) to LoopMBB. The next" LLVM,RISCV,1192,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be the creation of a new machine basic block (MBB) for the loop tail. The code creates a new MBB using the `CreateMachineBasicBlock` method of the `MachineFunction` class, and then inserts it into the function using the `insert` method. The new MBB is given a name that indicates it is the loop tail. Here is the predicted next statement: ``` auto LoopTailMBB = MF->CreateMachineBasicBlock(MBB.getBasicBlock()); ``` This statement creates a new MBB" LLVM,RISCV,1193,"The next statement of this code snippet is: BuildMI(LoopTailMBB, DL, TII->get(getSCForRMWCap(PtrIsCap, Ordering, CLen)), ScratchReg) .addReg(AddrReg) .addReg(NewValReg);" LLVM,RISCV,1194,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the code depends on the values of the variables `Width`, `PtrIsCap`, and `Ordering`, which are not provided in the code snippet. However, based on the code snippet, it appears that the function is checking the value of `Width` and returning a different value based on its value. If `Width` is equal to ``, the function returns the result of `getLRForRMW8(PtrIsCap, Ordering)`. If `Width` is not equal" LLVM,RISCV,1195,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `if (Width == ) return getLRForRMW32(PtrIsCap, Ordering);` This is because the `if` statement checks if `Width` is equal to `` (which is a placeholder for a literal value), and if it is, it returns the result of the `getLRForRMW32` function with the `PtrIsCap` and `Ordering` arguments. If `Width` is not equal to ``, the function will continue to" LLVM,RISCV,1196,"The next statement in the code snippet is: case AtomicOrdering :: Release :" LLVM,RISCV,1197,"The next statement in the code snippet is: `return PtrIsCap ? : ;` This statement is a ternary operator that returns a string literal based on the value of `PtrIsCap`. If `PtrIsCap` is true, the first string literal is returned, otherwise the second string literal is returned." LLVM,RISCV,1198,"The next statement after the given code snippet is: `return PtrIsCap ? : ;` This is because the `switch` statement is checking the value of `AtomicOrdering`, and the next case after `AtomicOrdering :: AcquireRelease` is `AtomicOrdering :: Release`, which is not present in the code snippet. Therefore, the next statement will be the default case, which is `return PtrIsCap ? : ;`." LLVM,RISCV,1199,"The next statement in the code snippet is: `return PtrIsCap ? : ;` This is because the `case` statement for `AtomicOrdering::AcquireRelease` does not have a `break` statement, so the code will fall through to the next `case` statement, which is `AtomicOrdering::Release`. The `return` statement in the `AtomicOrdering::Release` case will be executed, and the function will return the value of ``." LLVM,RISCV,1200,"The next statement in the code snippet is: return PtrIsCap ? : ; This is because the code is using the ternary operator (`?:`) to return a string literal based on the value of `PtrIsCap`. If `PtrIsCap` is true, the first string literal is returned, otherwise the second string literal is returned." LLVM,RISCV,1201,"The next statement after the `switch` block is `llvm_unreachable("""");`. This is because the `switch` block is checking the value of `Ordering`, and if it is not one of the expected values (`AtomicOrdering::Monotonic`, `AtomicOrdering::Acquire`, or `AtomicOrdering::Release`), it will execute the `default` case, which calls `llvm_unreachable("""")`. Therefore, the next statement after the `switch` block is `ll" LLVM,RISCV,1202,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `llvm_unreachable(""Unreachable code executed"");` This statement is executed when the `Width` variable is not equal to either `` or ``. The `llvm_unreachable` function is used to indicate that the code should not be reachable, and the string `""Unreachable code executed""` is passed as an argument to the function to indicate that the code is unreachable." LLVM,RISCV,1203,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the code depends on the values of the variables `Width`, `PtrIsCap`, and `Ordering`, which are not provided. However, based on the code snippet, it appears that the function is checking the value of `Width` and returning a different value depending on its value. If `Width` is equal to ``, the function returns the result of `getSCForRMW16(PtrIsCap, Ordering)`. If `Width` is not equal to ` ;` This is because the `switch` statement is checking the value of the `AtomicOrdering` enum, and the next value after `Release` is `AcquireRelease`." LLVM,RISCV,1205,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `case AtomicOrdering :: AcqRel : return PtrIsCap ? : ;` This is because the `switch` statement is checking the value of `Ordering` and returning a string literal based on the value of `PtrIsCap`. The `default` case is unreachable, so it is not included in the prediction." LLVM,RISCV,1206,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `case AtomicOrdering :: AcqRel : return PtrIsCap ? : ;` This is because the `switch` statement is checking the value of `Ordering`, and the next value after `AtomicOrdering :: Release` is `AtomicOrdering :: AcqRel`." LLVM,RISCV,1207,"The next statement after the given code snippet is: case AtomicOrdering :: Relaxed : return PtrIsCap ? : ; Explanation: The given code snippet is a switch statement that handles different cases of the AtomicOrdering enum. The cases are: * AtomicOrdering :: Monotonic * AtomicOrdering :: Acquire * AtomicOrdering :: Release The next case after the given code snippet is AtomicOrdering :: Relaxed, which is the next case" LLVM,RISCV,1208,"The next statement in the code snippet is: `return CLen == ? ( PtrIsCap ? : ) : ( PtrIsCap ? : ) ;` This statement is a ternary operator that checks the value of `CLen` and returns a string literal based on the value of `PtrIsCap`. If `CLen` is equal to ``, then the string literal `` is returned" LLVM,RISCV,1209,"The next statement in the code snippet is: BuildMI(LoopMBB, DL, TII->get(), ScratchReg).addReg(DestReg).addReg(IncrReg);" LLVM,RISCV,1210,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty because it depends on the specific values of the variables and the behavior of the functions called. However, based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the next statement will be a `switch` statement that checks the value of `BinOp` and performs a different action based on that value. The possible values of `BinOp` are `AtomicRMWInst::Xchg`, `AtomicRMWInst::Add`, and `AtomicRMWInst::Sub`, and the corresponding actions are to perform an atomic exchange," LLVM,RISCV,1211,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it appears to be part of a larger program and the context is not provided. However, based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the next statement will be a call to the `insertMaskedMerge` function, which is defined in the same program. The `insertMaskedMerge` function takes several arguments, including the `TII` object, the `DL` object, the `LoopMBB` object, the `ScratchReg` object, the `DestReg` object, the `Sc" LLVM,RISCV,1212,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet without knowing the context and the specific implementation of the functions being called. However, based on the names of the functions and the variables being used, it appears that the code is manipulating a control flow graph, where `LoopMBB` and `DoneMBB` are basic blocks, and `MBB` is a basic block that is being inserted into the graph. The first statement, `LoopMBB -> addSuccessor ( LoopMBB ) ;`, adds a successor to the `LoopMBB` basic block, which is itself. This is" LLVM,RISCV,1213,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the code depends on the specific values of the variables and the implementation of the functions being called. However, we can make some educated guesses based on the information provided. The code appears to be generating machine code for a loop that performs a read-modify-write operation on a memory location. The loop has two branches, one for the case where the memory location is a register and one for the case where it is a memory location. In the first branch, the code generates a machine instruction that reads" LLVM,RISCV,1214,"Based on the code snippet provided, it is difficult to predict the next statement with certainty. However, based on the context and the structure of the code, it is likely that the next statement will be another case statement for the `BinOp` variable, similar to the previous two case statements. The code appears to be generating machine code for a loop that performs an atomic read-modify-write operation on a memory location. The `BinOp` variable is used to determine the type of operation to be performed, and the `IsSigned` variable is used to determine whether the operation should be performed" LLVM,RISCV,1215,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `BuildMI(LoopHeadMBB, DL, TII->get(), Scratch1Reg).addReg(DestReg).addImm();` This statement is building a machine instruction using the `BuildMI` function, which is part of the LLVM API. The instruction being built is a `sext` instruction, which is used to sign-extend a value. The `sext` instruction takes two operands: the first is the register containing the value to be" LLVM,RISCV,1216,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `MBBI = NMBBI;` This statement assigns the value of `NMBBI` to `MBBI`, which is the iterator for the current basic block. The `expandMI` function is called on the current basic block, and the result is stored in the `Modified` variable. The loop then continues to the next iteration, where `MBBI` is incremented to the next basic block." LLVM,RISCV,1217,"Based on the code snippet you provided, it appears to be a part of a switch statement that is handling different types of atomic operations. The next statement in the switch statement is: case : return expandAtomicCmpXchg ( MBB , MBBI , false , , NextMBBI ) ; This statement is handling the case where the atomic operation is a compare-and-exchange (CAS) operation. The function ""expandAtomicCmpXchg"" is called with the current basic block (MBB), the current basic" LLVM,RISCV,1218,"Based on the code snippet provided, it is difficult to predict the next statement with certainty. However, based on the context and the patterns in the code, it is likely that the next statement will be another case statement with a similar structure to the previous ones. The code appears to be implementing a function that takes a sequence of instructions and expands them into a more detailed form. The function uses a series of case statements to match different types of instructions and expand them into a more detailed form. The cases are labeled with strings, which are likely to be the names of the instructions being matched. The next" LLVM,RISCV,1219,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the code depends on the values of the variables `Width` and `Ordering`, which are not provided in the code snippet. However, based on the names of the functions being called, it appears that the code is attempting to perform a read-modify-write (RMW) operation on a memory location, and the `Width` variable is being used to determine the size of the memory location being accessed. The `getLRForRMW32` and `getLRForRMW64`" LLVM,RISCV,1220,"The next statement in the code snippet is: `return ;` This is because the `default` case is executed when none of the other cases match, and it returns a string literal." LLVM,RISCV,1221,The next statement after the `return ;` statement will be the `case AtomicOrdering :: Release :` statement. LLVM,RISCV,1222,"The next statement after the `switch` statement is the `default` case, which is unreachable. The `llvm_unreachable` function is called with a string literal as an argument, which indicates that the code should never be reached. Therefore, the next statement of this code snippet is: ``` llvm_unreachable(""""); ```" LLVM,RISCV,1223,"return ""MyPass"";" LLVM,RISCV,1224,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet without knowing the specific implementation of the `getSCForRMW` function. However, based on the name of the function and the parameters it takes, it appears to be related to atomic memory operations and the width of the data being operated on. Without more information, it is not possible to determine the exact next statement of this code snippet." LLVM,RISCV,1225,"The next statement in the code snippet is: `return ;` This is because the `switch` statement is checking the value of `Ordering` and returning a string literal based on the value. The `default` case is not reachable, so the code will always return one of the string literals associated with the other cases." LLVM,RISCV,1226,"The next statement in this code snippet is: `case AtomicOrdering :: AcqRel : return ;` This is because the `switch` statement is checking the value of the `AtomicOrdering` enum, and the next value after `Acquire` is `AcqRel`." LLVM,RISCV,1227,"It is difficult to predict the next statement with certainty, as it depends on the specific values of the variables and the behavior of the `llvm_unreachable` function. However, based on the code snippet, it appears that the `llvm_unreachable` function is being called with a string literal as an argument, and the function is returning a string literal based on the value of the `AtomicOrdering` enum. Therefore, the next statement is likely to be a string literal, such as `""Monotonic""` or `""Acquire""`, depending on the value of" LLVM,RISCV,1228,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it appears to be part of a larger program and the context is not provided. However, based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the next statement will likely be a call to the `BuildMI` function, passing in the `MBB`, `DL`, `TII`, and `DestReg` parameters. The `BuildMI` function appears to be building a machine instruction, and the parameters passed in will determine the specific instruction that is built." LLVM,RISCV,1229,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it appears to be part of a larger program and the context is not provided. However, based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the next statement could be: * `BuildMI ( MBB , DL , TII -> get ( ) , DestReg ) . addReg ( OldValReg ) . addReg ( ScratchReg ) ;` This statement appears to be building a machine instruction using the `BuildMI` function, which takes a block, a data layout," LLVM,RISCV,1230,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet without knowing the context and the purpose of the code. However, based on the syntax and the functions used, it appears that the code is trying to build a machine instruction (BuildMI) and add registers to it (addReg). The instruction is being built using the values from the registers MBB, DL, and TII, and the value of the string literal """". The function get is being used to retrieve the value of the string literal, and the value is being stored in the register ValReg. The register ValReg is then" LLVM,RISCV,1231,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `MachineFunction` class and the `getSubtarget` and `getInstrInfo` methods. However, based on the names of these methods and the types of the variables involved, it is likely that the next statement will be a call to a method on the `TII` object, such as `TII->expandAtomicPseudo(MF)`." LLVM,RISCV,1232,"The next statement of this code snippet is: return new ExpandCoreVHwlpPseudoPass();" LLVM,RISCV,1233,"The next statement of this code snippet is: return new ExpandCoreVHwlpPseudoPass();" LLVM,RISCV,1234,"The next statement after `return COREV_EXPAND_HWLP_PSEUDO_NAME ;` would be the next line of code after the `return` statement. However, since this is the last line of the code snippet, there is no next statement." LLVM,RISCV,1235,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `BuildMI( * Preheader, HwlpSetup, DL, TII -> get( ) ) . addImm( LoopNum ) . addImm( count ) . addSym( LastInstrSymbol );` This statement is building a machine instruction using the `BuildMI` function, which is a part of the LLVM library. The `addImm` method is used to add immediate values to the instruction, and the `addSym` method is used to add a symbol to the instruction. The" LLVM,RISCV,1236,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet without knowing the specific implementation of the `MachineFunctionPass` class and the `ExpandCoreVHwlpPseudo` function. However, based on the name of the function and the class, it is likely that the next statement will be related to the expansion of a core VHWLP pseudo instruction. Here are some possible next statements: 1. `ExpandCoreVHwlpPseudo::expand()`: This could be the start of a new function that expands the core VHWLP pseudo instruction. 2." LLVM,RISCV,1237,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet without knowing the specific implementation of the `MachineFunctionPass` class and the `ExpandCoreVHwlpPseudo` function. However, based on the name of the function and the class, it is likely that the next statement will be related to the expansion of a core VHWLP pseudo instruction. Here are some possible next statements: 1. `ExpandCoreVHwlpPseudo::expand()`: This could be the start of a new function that expands the core VHWLP pseudo instruction. 2." LLVM,RISCV,1238,"The next statement after the code snippet you provided is: `return Changed;` This statement is outside the loop, so it will be executed after the loop has finished iterating over all the elements in the `MLI` container. The `Changed` variable is set to `true` if any of the calls to `ProcessLoop` returned `true`, and `false` otherwise. The `return` statement will return the value of `Changed` to the caller of the function." LLVM,RISCV,1239,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific values of the variables and the behavior of the functions being called. However, based on the syntax and the context of the code, it appears that the next statement will be a `return` statement, as the previous statements are all `case` statements that return a value. The `expandLoadLocalAddress`, `expandLoadAddress`, `expandLoadTLSIEAddress`, and `expandLoadTLSGDAddress` functions all appear to be related to loading data from memory, and the `expandReadCS" LLVM,RISCV,1240,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `BuildMI` function and the values of the variables `MBB`, `MBBI`, `TII`, and `Address`. However, based on the syntax and the context of the code, it appears that the next statement will be a call to the `addImm` method of the `BuildMI` object, passing in the `Address` variable as an argument." LLVM,RISCV,1241,"Based on the code snippet provided, it is difficult to predict the next statement with certainty. However, based on the context and the pattern of the code, it is likely that the next statement will be another iteration of the loop, with the variable `Op` being incremented and the loop continuing until `Op` is equal to `MI.operands_end()`. The code snippet appears to be part of a function that is building a machine instruction using a `MachineInstrBuilder` object, and it is checking each operand of the instruction to see if it is a register or not. If the oper" LLVM,RISCV,1242,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `NewMBB->splice(NewMBB->end(), &MBB, std::next(MBBI), MBB.end());` This statement is part of the `expandAuipccInstPair` function, which is used to expand the `Auipcc` instruction pair in the machine code. The `splice` function is used to move instructions from one basic block to another. In this case, it is moving instructions from the `MBB` basic block to the `NewMBB` basic block. The `std" LLVM,RISCV,1243,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `expandCapLoadGlobalCap` function and the input data. However, based on the name of the function and the parameters it takes, it appears to be related to expanding a pseudo-instruction that loads a global capability. The function takes three parameters: a reference to a `MachineBasicBlock` object, an iterator for the block, and a reference to the next iterator. It returns a `bool` value indicating whether the expansion was successful. Without more information," LLVM,RISCV,1244,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return expandAuipccInstPair(MBB, MBBI, NextMBBI, , SecondOpcode);` This statement is a function call to `expandAuipccInstPair`, which is a function that expands the `auipcc` instruction pair. The function takes several arguments, including the current basic block (`MBB`), the current instruction (`MBBI`), the next instruction (`NextMBBI`), a string literal (``), and the second opcode (`SecondOpcode`). The" LLVM,RISCV,1245,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return expandAuipccInstPair ( MBB , MBBI , NextMBBI , , ) ;` This statement is a function call to `expandAuipccInstPair`, which is a function that takes five arguments: `MBB`, `MBBI`, `NextMBBI`, ``, and ``. The function call is returning the result of the function call, which is likely to be a value of some sort." LLVM,RISCV,1246,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `expandCapLoadTLSGDCap` function and the state of the `MBB` and `MBBI` variables. However, based on the name of the function and the parameters it takes, it is likely that the next statement will be related to expanding a pseudo-instruction that loads a TLS GD capability. This could involve emitting additional instructions to load the capability from memory or to perform other related operations." LLVM,RISCV,1247,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be the return statement, which returns the result of the `expandAuipccInstPair` function. The `expandAuipccInstPair` function is called with the `MBB`, `MBBI`, and `NextMBBI` arguments, and it is expected to return a boolean value indicating whether the expansion was successful or not. The `expandAuipccInstPair` function is not defined in the code snippet provided, so it is not possible to determine its exact behavior. However, based on the name of the function, it appears to" LLVM,RISCV,1248,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `SecondOpcode = STI.is64Bit() ? : ;` This statement is assigning the value of `SecondOpcode` to the result of the ternary operator. The ternary operator is used to conditionally assign a value based on the result of the `is64Bit()` method. If the method returns `true`, the value of `SecondOpcode` will be set to ``. If the method returns `false`, the value of `" LLVM,RISCV,1249,"Based on the code snippet you provided, it appears to be a part of a function that is generating machine code for a specific instruction. The function is using a combination of string literals, numerical literals, and variables to generate the machine code. The code snippet you provided is incomplete, so it's difficult to predict the next statement with certainty. However, based on the context of the code, it appears that the next statement will likely be another `if` statement or a loop that will continue generating machine code for the instruction. It's worth noting that the code snippet you provided is using" LLVM,RISCV,1250,"This code snippet is a part of a larger program that appears to be generating machine code for a processor. The code is using a library called ""LLVM"" to generate the machine code. The code is creating a new basic block in the machine code, and it is adding instructions to the basic block. The instructions are being added using a library called ""BuildMI"". The code is using a loop to add instructions to the basic block. The loop is iterating over a range of values, and it is using the ""addReg"" method to add a register operand to each instruction. The ""addMem" LLVM,RISCV,1251,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `unsigned DestReg = MI.getOperand(0).getReg();` This line of code retrieves the destination register for the atomic binary operation from the first operand of the `MachineInstr` object `MI`. The `getOperand` method is called on `MI` with the index `0`, which returns a `MachineOperand` object representing the first operand of the instruction. The `getReg` method is then called on this object to retrieve the register number of the destination register." LLVM,RISCV,1252,"The code snippet you provided is a part of a function that is generating machine code for a specific instruction. The function is using the `MachineInstr` class to represent the instruction and its operands, and it is using the `BuildMI` class to generate the machine code. The code snippet you provided is checking the width of the instruction and the string literal, and it is getting the registers for the destination, scratch, address, increment, and mask operands. It is also getting the atomic ordering for the instruction. Based on the information provided, it is not possible to predict the next statement of" LLVM,RISCV,1253,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty because it depends on the value of the `BinOp` variable, which is not specified in the code snippet. However, based on the code snippet, it appears that the `BinOp` variable is being used to select which case statement to execute. The `default` case is unreachable, so it is not possible to predict what the next statement will be. The other case statements are all building a `BuildMI` object with different parameters, so it is likely that the next statement will be a call" LLVM,RISCV,1254,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet without knowing the specific context and the purpose of the code. However, based on the code snippet provided, it appears to be related to the implementation of a loop in a compiler or interpreter. The code snippet defines a number of variables and performs a series of operations on them, including creating a new basic block, adding successors to the basic block, and inserting instructions into the basic block. It also appears to be using a number of helper functions and classes, such as `TII` and `DL`, which are not defined in the code snippet provided." LLVM,RISCV,1255,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific values of the variables and the behavior of the functions being called. However, based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the next statement will be the start of a loop, with the loop body being executed repeatedly until a certain condition is met. The loop body appears to be performing an atomic read-modify-write operation on a memory location, with the new value being determined by the current value and an increment value. The loop will continue until the new value is equal to the increment value, at which" LLVM,RISCV,1256,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it appears to be part of a larger program and the context is not provided. However, based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the next statement may be related to the creation of a new machine basic block (MBB) and the manipulation of the machine instructions (MIs) within it. The code snippet defines a new machine basic block (NewMBB) and sets its label to be emitted. It then inserts the new MBB into the machine function (MF) and splices the new MBB" LLVM,RISCV,1257,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the functions and classes involved. However, based on the names of the functions and variables, it appears that the code is generating machine code for a specific instruction set architecture. The `BuildMI` function is likely building a machine instruction, and the `addDisp`, `addReg`, and `addMBB` functions are likely adding a displacement, register, and basic block to the instruction, respectively. The `transferSuccessorsAndUpdatePHIs` function is likely updating the successors" LLVM,RISCV,1258,"Based on the code snippet you provided, it appears to be a part of a function that handles atomic operations on a memory block. The function takes a memory block, a memory block instruction, and a next memory block instruction as inputs, and it performs various atomic operations on the memory block based on the opcode of the memory block instruction. The function first retrieves the opcode of the memory block instruction using the `getOpcode()` method, and then it switches on the opcode to determine which atomic operation to perform. The atomic operations that can be performed include: * `Nand`: A bit" LLVM,RISCV,1259,"Based on the code snippet you provided, it appears to be a part of a switch statement that is handling different cases for a particular operation. The next statement is likely to be another case statement or a default statement. Without more context, it is difficult to predict the exact next statement, but based on the pattern of the code, it is likely to be another case statement or a default statement. The next statement could potentially be a case statement that handles a different input value or a default statement that handles any input value that is not explicitly handled by the previous case statements." LLVM,RISCV,1260,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `const MCInstrDesc & Desc = TII -> get ( Opcode ) ;` This statement retrieves the instruction descriptor for the opcode `Opcode` using the `get` method of the `TII` object. The `Desc` variable is then assigned the resulting descriptor object." LLVM,RISCV,1261,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `Register SrcReg = MBBI->getOperand().getReg();` This is because the code is using the `getOperand` method of the `MBBI` object to retrieve the operand at the specified index (which is ``), and then calling the `getReg` method on that operand to retrieve the register it is using." LLVM,RISCV,1262,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `BuildMI(LoopTailMBB, DL, TII->get(getSCForRMW(Ordering, Width)), ScratchReg).addReg(AddrReg).addReg(ScratchReg);` This statement is building a new machine instruction using the `BuildMI` function, which takes several parameters: * `LoopTailMBB`: The basic block where the instruction will be inserted. * `DL`: The data layout of the instruction. * `TII`: The target instruction information, which" LLVM,RISCV,1263,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific inputs and the behavior of the functions being called. However, based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the next statement will be the creation of a new machine basic block (MBB) and the insertion of a new machine instruction (MI) into the MBB. The code snippet is creating a loop with a loop head, loop body, and loop tail, and it is using the `CreateMachineBasicBlock` and `CreateMachineInstruction` functions to create the necessary blocks and instructions. The" LLVM,RISCV,1264,"Based on the code snippet you provided, it appears to be a switch statement in a programming language. The next statement after the code snippet you provided would be the default case, which is not specified in the code snippet. In a switch statement, the default case is executed when none of the other cases match the value of the switch expression. In this case, the switch expression is not specified in the code snippet, so it is not possible to determine what the default case would be. It is also possible that the code snippet you provided is incomplete or has been modified, and the default case is not actually present in" LLVM,RISCV,1265,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet without knowing the specific implementation of the functions and methods being called. However, based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the next statement will be a call to the `add` method of the `BuildMI` object, passing in the result of the `getOperand` method of the `MBBI` object as an argument." LLVM,RISCV,1266,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be: `BuildMI(MBB, MBBI, DL, Desc).addReg(DstReg, RegState::Define | getDeadRegState(DstIsDead)).add(MBBI->getOperand()).add(MBBI->getOperand());` This statement is adding a new instruction to the machine code being generated, using the `BuildMI` function. The instruction is being added to the basic block `MBB`, and the" LLVM,RISCV,1267,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet without knowing the context in which it is being executed. However, based on the code snippet provided, it appears to be related to the manipulation of machine code instructions in a compiler. The code snippet defines several variables, including `DestReg`, `Symbol`, `NewMBB`, and `LivePhysRegs`. It also references several functions, such as `getOperand()`, `getReg()`, `CreateMachineBasicBlock()`, `setLabelMustBeEmitted()`, `insert()`, `BuildMI()`, `addDisp()`, `addReg()`, `" LLVM,RISCV,1268,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be: `NewMBB->splice(NewMBB->end(), &MBB, std::next(MBBI), MBB.end());` This statement is adding a new basic block to the machine function and splicing it into the current basic block. The new basic block is created using the `CreateMachineBasicBlock` method of the `MachineFunction` class, and the `splice` method is used to insert the new basic block into the current basic block. The `std::next(MBBI)` iterator is used to" LLVM,RISCV,1269,"Based on the code snippet provided, it appears to be a part of a function called `expandMI` that is part of a larger program. The function takes in several parameters, including a `MachineBasicBlock` object and two iterators for the block. The function appears to be expanding a pseudo instruction into a series of other instructions. The `switch` statement checks the opcode of the instruction being expanded and calls a function called `expandAtomicBinOp` with different parameters depending on the opcode. Without more context, it is difficult to determine exactly what the next statement of the code" LLVM,RISCV,1270,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet without knowing the specific values of the variables and the context in which the code is being executed. However, based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the next statement could be one of the following: 1. `return expandAtomicBinOp ( MBB , MBBI , AtomicRMWInst :: Nand , false , , NextMBBI ) ;` 2. `return expandAtomicBinOp ( MBB , MBBI , AtomicRMWInst :: Xchg , true , <" LLVM,RISCV,1271,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet without knowing the specific values of the variables and the implementation of the functions being called. However, based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the next statement will be: `BuildMI(MBB, MBBI, DL, TII->get(Opcode), TRI->getSubReg(DestReg, SubRegIdx + I)).addReg(Base).addMemOperand(*(MBBI->memoperands_begin()));` This statement is likely to be part of a loop that is iterating over the memory" LLVM,RISCV,1272,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `BuildMI(MBB, MBBI, DL, TII->get(Opcode)).addReg(TRI->getSubReg(SrcReg, SubRegIdx + I)).addReg(Base).addMemOperand(*(MBBI->memoperands_begin()));` This statement is a function call to `BuildMI`, which is a function that creates a new machine instruction. The function takes several arguments, including `MBB`, `MBBI`, `DL`, and `Opcode`, which are all variables defined in" LLVM,RISCV,1273,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `BuildMI(MBB, MBBI, DL, TII->get(Opcode)).addReg(TRI->getSubReg(SrcReg, SubRegIdx + I)).addReg(Base).addMemOperand(*(MBBI->memoperands_begin()));` This statement is a function call to `BuildMI`, which is a member function of the `MBB` class. The function takes several arguments, including `MBB`, `MBBI`, `DL`, and `Opcode`. The `Opcode" LLVM,RISCV,1274,"Based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the next statement will be a `case` statement for the `BinOp` variable. The `BinOp` variable is an enumeration of the `AtomicRMWInst::BinOp` type, and the `case` statement will likely handle each possible value of the enumeration. Without knowing the specific values of the `BinOp` enumeration, it is difficult to predict exactly what the next statement will be. However, it is likely that the `case` statement will perform some operation on the `DestReg`, `Scr" LLVM,RISCV,1275,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be a call to a function that performs the actual atomic operation, such as `AtomicRMWInst::performAtomicRMW(BinOp, Width, DestReg, ScratchReg, AddrReg, IncrReg, MaskReg)`. The function takes the binary operation, the width of the operands, and the registers containing the operands as arguments, and performs the atomic operation on the memory location specified by the address register." LLVM,RISCV,1276,"It's difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `insert` and `addSuccessor` methods, as well as the state of the `MF`, `LoopMBB`, `DoneMBB`, and `MBB` objects. However, based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the `insert` method is being called on the `MF` object with two arguments: the first is the result of incrementing the iterator of the `MBB` object, and the second is the `LoopMBB` object" LLVM,RISCV,1277,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific values of the variables and the behavior of the functions being called. However, based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the next statement will be the beginning of a loop, with the loop head being the block `LoopHeadMBB` and the loop tail being the block `LoopTailMBB`. The loop will likely iterate over the instructions in the basic block `LoopHeadMBB`, and the `BuildMI` function will be used to create a new machine instruction for each iteration. The `" LLVM,RISCV,1278,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be: `BuildMI(LoopHeadMBB, DL, TII->get(getLRForRMW32(Ordering)), DestReg).addReg(AddrReg);` This is because the previous statement in the code snippet is `AtomicOrdering Ordering = static_cast(MI.getOperand(IsMasked ? : ).getImm());`, which sets the `Ordering` variable to the atomic ordering of the memory operation" LLVM,RISCV,1279,"Based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the next statement will be a case statement that will handle the different types of binary operations that can be performed on the atomic memory location. The case statement will likely contain a series of if-else statements that will determine the appropriate instruction to use based on the type of operation being performed. The code snippet is part of a function that is responsible for generating machine code for a loop that performs an atomic read-modify-write operation on a memory location. The function takes a number of parameters, including the loop head and tail basic blocks, the target instruction, and the destination" LLVM,RISCV,1280,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `BuildMI` function and the values of the variables `MBB`, `DL`, `TII`, `ScratchReg`, `OldValReg`, `NewValReg`, `MaskReg`, and `DestReg`. However, based on the syntax and the fact that the code is using the `BuildMI` function, it appears that the code is attempting to generate machine code instructions for a specific architecture. The `BuildMI` function is likely a function that generates a machine code" LLVM,RISCV,1281,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it appears to be a fragment of a larger program and the context is not provided. However, based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the next statement could be a call to the `BuildMI` function, passing in the `ScratchReg` and `MaskReg` as arguments. The `BuildMI` function appears to be a function that builds a machine instruction, and the `ScratchReg` and `MaskReg` are registers that are being used as arguments to the function. The function is called twice" LLVM,RISCV,1282,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet without knowing the context and the purpose of the function. However, based on the function name ""insertSext"", it appears to be related to inserting a sign-extended value into a register. Based on the function signature, it appears that the function takes the following arguments: * TII: A pointer to an object of type InstrInfo, which appears to be a structure that contains information about the instruction set architecture. * DL: A DebugLoc object, which appears to be a structure that" LLVM,RISCV,1283,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet without knowing the context and the purpose of the code. However, based on the syntax and the functions used, it appears that the code is trying to build a machine instruction (BuildMI) and add registers to it (addReg). The instruction is being built using the values from the registers MBB, DL, and TII, and the value of the string literal """". The function get is being used to retrieve the value of the string literal, and the value is being stored in the register ValReg. The register ValReg is then" LLVM,RISCV,1284,"Based on the code snippet provided, it is difficult to predict the next statement with certainty. However, based on the context of the code, it appears that the `expandMI` function is responsible for expanding a machine instruction (MI) into a sequence of other instructions. The function takes three arguments: * `MBB`: a reference to the machine basic block (MBB) that contains the MI. * `MBBI`: an iterator that points to the MI in the MBB. * `NextMBBI`: an iterator that points to the next MI in the MBB" LLVM,RISCV,1285,"The next statement of the code snippet is: `case AtomicRMWInst::Sub: BuildMI(LoopMBB, DL, TII->get(), ScratchReg) .addReg(DestReg) .addReg(IncrReg); break;` This is a `case` statement within a `switch` block, where the `switch` block is checking the value of the `BinOp` variable. The `case` statement is checking for the value `AtomicRMWInst::Sub`, and if it matches, it will execute" LLVM,RISCV,1286,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `insertMaskedMerge(TII, DL, LoopMBB, ScratchReg, DestReg, ScratchReg, MaskReg, ScratchReg);` This statement inserts a masked merge instruction into the loop basic block, which merges the values of the scratch register and the destination register using the mask register. The scratch register is used as the output of the merge instruction, and the destination register is used as the input to the merge instruction. The mask register is used to select which bits to merge." LLVM,RISCV,1287,"Based on the code snippet you provided, it appears to be a switch statement that is handling different cases for atomic binary operations. The next statement after the code snippet you provided would be the default case, which is not specified in the code snippet. Therefore, I cannot predict the next statement with certainty. However, based on the pattern of the code snippet, it is likely that the default case would be a call to `expandAtomicBinOp` with the `AtomicRMWInst` parameter set to `AtomicRMWInst::Xchg`. This is because the previous cases in the switch" LLVM,RISCV,1288,"Based on the code snippet you provided, it appears to be a part of a function that is expanding atomic binary operations. The function takes in a few parameters, including the operation to be performed (e.g. Nand, Xchg, Add, Sub), a boolean value indicating whether the operation is atomic, and a literal value representing the number of bits to be operated on. Based on the code snippet, it is difficult to predict the next statement with certainty, as it depends on the specific inputs and the implementation of the `expandAtomicBinOp` function. However, it is likely" LLVM,RISCV,1289,"Based on the code snippet you provided, it appears to be part of a function that is handling different types of atomic binary operations. The `switch` statement is checking the opcode of the instruction being processed, and the `case` statements are handling different types of atomic binary operations. The next statement in the code snippet is: ``` case : return expandAtomicBinOp ( MBB , MBBI , AtomicRMWInst :: Xchg , true , , NextMBBI ) ; ``` This statement is handling the case where" LLVM,RISCV,1290,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return expandLoadLocalAddress(MBB, MBBI, NextMBBI);` This is because the `switch` statement is checking the value of `MBBI -> getOpcode()` and the first `case` statement that matches the value is executed. In this case, the value of `MBBI -> getOpcode()` is ``, which matches the first `case` statement. Therefore, the code inside the first `case` statement is executed, which is `return expandLoadLocalAddress(MBB, MBBI, Next" LLVM,RISCV,1291,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be the definition of the `ISA_LIT` template parameter, which is used to specify the instruction set architecture (ISA) for which the pseudo instructions should be expanded. Here's an example of what the definition of the `ISA_LIT` template parameter might look like: ``` template struct ExpandPseudoPass : public FunctionPass { // ... }; ``` This definition specifies that the `ExpandPseudoPass` class is a template class that takes" LLVM,RISCV,1292,"The next statement of this code snippet is: return new ExpandPseudoPass();" LLVM,RISCV,1293,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet without knowing the context and the purpose of the code. However, based on the syntax and the functions being called, it appears that the code is generating machine code for a specific instruction set architecture. The code is creating a new basic block (NewMBB) and inserting it into a function (MF) at a specific location (++ MBB.getIterator()). It is then building two machine instructions (BuildMI) using the new basic block and adding them to the basic block. The first instruction is an addDisp instruction with a symbol, a number" LLVM,RISCV,1294,"Based on the code snippet you provided, it appears that the next statement will be: `SecondOpcode = STI.is64Bit() ? : ;` This is because the previous statement, `const auto & STI = MF->getSubtargetSubtarget>();`, defines a reference to a subtarget object, and the next statement uses this reference to call the `is64Bit()` method on the subtarget object. The result of this method call is then used to determine which string literal to" LLVM,RISCV,1295,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `SecondOpcode = STI.is64Bit() ? : ;` This statement assigns the value of `SecondOpcode` based on the result of the `is64Bit()` method called on the `STI` object. If the result is `true`, `SecondOpcode` is assigned the value of ``, otherwise it is assigned the value of ``." LLVM,RISCV,1296,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be the return statement, which returns the result of the `expandAuipcInstPair` function. The `expandAuipcInstPair` function is called with the `MBB`, `MBBI`, and `NextMBBI` parameters, and it is expected to return a boolean value indicating whether the load local address was successfully expanded." LLVM,RISCV,1297,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return expandAuipcInstPair ( MBB , MBBI , NextMBBI , , ) ;` This statement is a function call to `expandAuipcInstPair`, which is a function that takes five arguments: `MBB`, `MBBI`, `NextMBBI`, ``, and ``. The function returns a value, which is then returned by the `expandAuipcInstPair` function." LLVM,RISCV,1298,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet without knowing the context and the specific implementation of the `expandLoadTLSGDAddress` function. However, based on the name of the function, it appears to be related to expanding a load instruction for a TLS (Thread-Local Storage) GD (Global Data) address. The function takes three arguments: a `MachineBasicBlock` object, an iterator for the block, and a reference to an iterator for the next block. It returns a `bool` value indicating whether the expansion was successful. Without more information, it is" LLVM,RISCV,1299,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet without knowing the context and the specific implementation of the `expandLoadTLSGDAddress` function. However, based on the name of the function, it appears to be related to expanding a load instruction for a TLS (Thread-Local Storage) GD (Global Data) address. The function takes three arguments: a `MachineBasicBlock` object, an iterator for the block, and a reference to an iterator for the next block. It returns a `bool` value indicating whether the expansion was successful. Without more information, it is" LLVM,RISCV,1300,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return Modified;` This is because the `expandMBB` function is declared to return a `bool` value, and the `Modified` variable is the last statement that is executed in the function before the return statement. The `Modified` variable is set to `true` if any of the calls to `expandMI` in the loop return `true`, and it is returned as the result of the `expandMBB` function." LLVM,RISCV,1301,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `BuildMI` and `addReg` functions, as well as the values of the variables `TII`, `MBB`, `MBBI`, `DL`, `Desc`, `DstReg`, and `RegState`. However, based on the code snippet you provided, it appears that the next statement after the `addReg` calls is the `MBBI->eraseFromParent()` call. This is because the `addReg` calls are adding the `DstReg`" LLVM,RISCV,1302,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `BuildMI` and `addReg` functions, as well as the values of the variables `TII`, `MBB`, `MBBI`, `DL`, `Desc`, `DstReg`, and `RegState`. However, based on the code snippet you provided, it appears that the next statement after the `addReg` calls is the `MBBI->eraseFromParent()` call. This is because the `addReg` calls are adding the `DstReg`" LLVM,RISCV,1303,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be a call to the `expandVSetVL` function, which is a member function of the `MachineBasicBlock` class. The function takes two arguments: a reference to a `MachineBasicBlock` object and an iterator to a specific instruction within that block. The function is likely to be used to expand a vector instruction in the machine code, and the `MBB` and `MBBI` variables are used to represent the basic block and the instruction within that block that is being expanded. The `DL` variable is likely to be used to store the" LLVM,RISCV,1304,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `BuildMI` function and the values of the variables `MBB`, `MBBI`, `DL`, and `Desc`. However, based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the next statement will be a call to the `add` method of the `MBBI` object, passing in the result of the `getOperand` method called on `MBBI` with the argument ``." LLVM,RISCV,1305,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be a return statement, as the `getPassName()` function is expected to return a string value. The return statement is likely to be `return _EXPAND_PSEUDO_NAME;`, where `` is a placeholder for a specific instruction set architecture (ISA) name, such as ""x86"" or ""arm"". The `_EXPAND_PSEUDO_NAME` suffix is a convention used in the LLVM codebase to indicate that the function is expected" LLVM,RISCV,1306,"return ""MyPass"";" LLVM,RISCV,1307,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `ExpandPseudo` function and the input data. However, based on the name of the function and the fact that it is a machine function pass, it is likely that the next statement will be related to the expansion of pseudo-instructions in the input data. Some possible next statements could include: * A call to a function that expands a specific pseudo-instruction, such as `ExpandPseudo_ADD` or `ExpandPseudo_SUB`." LLVM,RISCV,1308,The next statement after the `for` loop in the code snippet is `return Modified ;`. LLVM,RISCV,1309,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be: `SavedRegs.set(FP);` This is because the previous statement `unsigned FP = STI.isRV64() ? : ;` sets the value of `FP` to either `` or `` depending on the value returned by `STI.isRV64()`. The next statement is likely to be setting the value of `FP` in the `SavedRegs` object." LLVM,RISCV,1310,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the `ehDataReg` function is not specified. However, based on the name of the function and the fact that it is a member of the `FrameLowering` class, it is likely that the function is used to retrieve the value of a register that is used for exception handling. Without more information about the specific implementation of the `FrameLowering` class and the `ehDataReg` function, it is not possible to provide a more detailed prediction of the next statement of this code snippet." LLVM,RISCV,1311,"This code snippet is part of a function that is responsible for eliminating call frame pseudo instructions in a machine function. The function takes three arguments: a reference to a machine function, a reference to a machine basic block, and an iterator for the machine basic block. The function first retrieves the instruction info object for the machine function's subtarget and casts it to a const pointer to the ISA-specific instruction info object. It then retrieves the ISA-specific subtarget object from the machine function and checks if the call frame has been reserved. If the call frame has not been reserved," LLVM,RISCV,1312,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `BuildMI(MBB, I, dl, TII.get(ADDu), SP).addReg(FP).addReg(ZERO);` This statement is calling the `BuildMI` function with the following arguments: * `MBB`: The current machine basic block. * `I`: The iterator for the current instruction. * `dl`: The debug location for the current instruction. * `TII.get(ADDu)`: The instruction for the `ADDu` opcode. * `SP" LLVM,RISCV,1313,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `const TargetRegisterClass * RC = & ;` This line of code is declaring a constant pointer to a `TargetRegisterClass` object, and initializing it to the address of a string literal. The string literal is not provided in the code snippet, so it is not possible to determine what it contains." LLVM,RISCV,1314,"The next statement after the code snippet you provided is: `return MF.getTarget().Options.DisableFramePointerElim(MF) || MFI->hasVarSizedObjects() || MFI->isFrameAddressTaken();` This statement is a return statement that returns a boolean value indicating whether the frame pointer elimination optimization should be disabled for the current function. The return value is determined by the result of the logical OR operation of three boolean expressions: * `MF.getTarget().Options.DisableFramePointerElim(MF)`: This expression checks if" LLVM,RISCV,1315,"The next statement of this code snippet is: return isInt < > ( MFI -> getMaxCallFrameSize ( ) + getStackAlignment ( ) ) && ! MFI -> hasVarSizedObjects ( ) ;" LLVM,RISCV,1316,"The next statement after the code snippet you provided is: `return isInt < > ( MFI -> getMaxCallFrameSize ( ) + getStackAlignment ( ) ) && ! MFI -> hasVarSizedObjects ( ) ;` This statement is a return statement that returns a boolean value indicating whether the current method frame is valid or not. The return value is determined by the result of the logical AND operation between two conditions: 1. The first condition is whether the size of the method frame is less than or equal to the maximum call frame size plus the stack" LLVM,RISCV,1317,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `TargetFrameLowering::TargetFrameLowering(TargetFrameLowering::StackGrowsDown, , )` This is a constructor call for the `TargetFrameLowering` class, which is a subclass of `FrameLowering`. The constructor takes three arguments: * `TargetFrameLowering::StackGrowsDown`: This is a constant that indicates the direction of the stack growth. * ``: This is a numeric literal that represents the size of the stack frame" LLVM,RISCV,1318,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `TargetFrameLowering::TargetFrameLowering(TargetFrameLowering::StackGrowsDown, , )` This is a constructor call for the `TargetFrameLowering` class, which is a subclass of `FrameLowering`. The constructor takes three arguments: * `TargetFrameLowering::StackGrowsDown`: This is a constant that indicates the direction of the stack growth. * ``: This is a numeric literal that represents the size of the stack frame" LLVM,RISCV,1319,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet without knowing the specific values of the variables and the functions being called. However, based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the next statement will be a call to the `BuildMI` function, which is likely to be a member function of the `TII` object. The `BuildMI` function is called with a number of arguments, including the `MBB`, `MBBI`, `DL`, `TII`, `DestReg`, and `Flag` variables. The `MBB` and `MBBI` variables are likely to be" LLVM,RISCV,1320,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `BuildMI(MBB, MBBI, DL, TII->get(Opc), DestReg).addReg(SrcReg).addReg(ScratchReg, RegState::Kill).setMIFlag(Flag);` This statement is a call to the `BuildMI` function, which is a member of the `MachineInstr` class. The function takes several arguments, including the basic block (`MBB`), the machine instruction builder (`MBBI`), the data layout (`DL`), the target instruction (`TII->get" LLVM,RISCV,1321,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the program depends on the specific values of the variables and the implementation of the `getVLENFactoredAmount` function. However, based on the syntax and the context, it is likely that the next statement will be an assignment to a variable or a function call that uses the value of `FactorRegister`." LLVM,RISCV,1322,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific values of the variables and the behavior of the functions being called. However, based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the next statement will be a call to the `BuildMI` function, passing in the `MBB`, `MBBI`, `DL`, `TII->get(Opc)`, and `SPReg` variables as arguments. The `BuildMI` function is likely to construct a new machine instruction using these arguments and add it to the instruction stream." LLVM,RISCV,1323,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `uint64_t StackSize = Offset;` This statement assigns the value of `Offset` to the variable `StackSize`, which is a `uint64_t` (unsigned 64-bit integer) variable." LLVM,RISCV,1324,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `const auto * RVFI = MF->getInfoMachineFunctionInfo>();` This line retrieves the `ISA_LIT`MachineFunctionInfo` object associated with the current machine function, which is stored in the `MF` variable. The `const_cast` is used to cast away the `const` qualifier from the `MF` variable, which is necessary because the `getInfo` method is not declared as `const`. The `RVFI` variable is then initialized to point" LLVM,RISCV,1325,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific inputs and the behavior of the functions being called. However, based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the next statement will be: `SavedRegs.set(Regs[i]);` This statement is part of a loop that iterates over the callee-saved registers in the `Regs` array, and it sets the corresponding bit in the `SavedRegs` bitset for each register that is a callee-saved register. The loop will continue until all" LLVM,RISCV,1326,"Based on the code snippet you provided, it appears to be a part of a larger program that is using the LLVM compiler infrastructure. The code is likely setting up a machine frame for a function that has the ""fnattribute"" attribute set, and it is also checking if the function has any calls. The next statement of the code snippet you provided is: `static const MCPhysReg CSRegs[] = { , , , , , setStackSize(FrameSize);`" LLVM,RISCV,1328,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `if (Amount != ) {` This is because the previous statement, `Amount = MI->getOperand().getImm()`, sets the value of `Amount` to the immediate value of the operand at index ``. If this value is not equal to ``, then the `if` statement will be executed." LLVM,RISCV,1329,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `if ( RI->hasStackRealignment(MF) || MFI.hasVarSizedObjects() ) {`" LLVM,RISCV,1330,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `adjustReg(MBB, LastFrameDestroy, DL, SPReg, FPReg, -FPOffset, MachineInstr::FrameDestroy);` This statement adjusts the stack pointer register (SPReg) by subtracting the frame pointer offset (FPOffset) from it, and sets the frame pointer register (FPReg) to the adjusted stack pointer value. This is done to ensure that the stack pointer and frame pointer registers are properly aligned and that the stack frame is properly set up for the function. The `adjustReg`" LLVM,RISCV,1331,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `BuildMI(MBB, MBBI, DL, TII->get(TargetOpcode::CFI_INSTRUCTION)) .addCFIIndex(CFIIndex) .setMIFlag(MachineInstr::FrameSetup);` This statement is building a machine instruction using the `BuildMI` function, which takes several parameters: * `MBB`: The machine basic block in which the instruction will be inserted. * `MBBI`: The machine basic block instruction that will be inserted. * `DL`: The" LLVM,RISCV,1332,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `Register SCSPReg = ( ) ;` This line of code declares a variable `SCSPReg` of type `Register` and initializes it with the result of calling the function `` with no arguments. The function `` is not defined in the code snippet provided, so it is not possible to determine what it does or what value it returns." LLVM,RISCV,1333,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet without knowing the specific implementation of the `BuildMI` function and the `MachineInstr` class. However, based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the next statement will be a call to the `addReg` method of the `MachineInstr` class, passing in the `RAReg` and `SCSPReg` variables as arguments." LLVM,RISCV,1334,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `CSI.size() > `" LLVM,RISCV,1335,"Based on the code snippet you provided, it appears that the next statement will be: `return ;` This is because the `if` statement that precedes the next statement checks whether `RVFI->getLibCallStackSize()` is true, and if it is, the function will return ``. If `RVFI->getLibCallStackSize()` is false, the next statement will be executed, which is the `if` statement that checks whether `StackSize` is less than `` and whether `CSI." LLVM,RISCV,1336,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return STI.getFPReg();`" LLVM,RISCV,1337,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `Offset += StackOffset::get(ScalarLocalVarSize, RVFI->getRVVStackSize());` This statement is adding the size of the scalar local variables (excluding the callee-saved registers and the varargs save area) to the offset. The `ScalarLocalVarSize` variable is calculated as the difference between the stack size and the callee-saved registers and varargs save area, plus the RVVPadding. The `RVVStackSize` is the size of the RVV stack, which" LLVM,RISCV,1338,"Based on the code snippet you provided, it appears to be a function that returns a library call ID based on the input parameters. The function takes two parameters: a `MachineFunction` object and a vector of `CalleeSavedInfo` objects. The function first checks if the vector of `CalleeSavedInfo` objects is empty or if the `useSaveRestoreLibCalls` flag is set in the `MachineFunctionInfo` object. If either of these conditions is true, the function returns -1. If the vector is not empty and the flag is not set, the" LLVM,RISCV,1339,"The next statement after the `if` block will be the return statement. The `if` block checks if the value of `LibCallID` is equal to `-NUM_LIT`. If it is, the function returns `nullptr`. Otherwise, the function returns the value of `RestoreLibCalls[LibCallID]`. So, the next statement after the `if` block will be the return statement, which returns the value of `RestoreLibCalls[LibCallID]`." LLVM,RISCV,1340,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return SpillLibCalls[CSI.size()];` Explanation: The `getSpillLibCallName` function is declared as `static` and takes two parameters: a `const MachineFunction &` and a `const std::vector &`. The function returns a `const char *` and is defined as follows: * It declares a `static` array of `const char *` called `SpillLibCalls`. * It returns the element of `" LLVM,RISCV,1341,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return STI.getSPReg();`" LLVM,RISCV,1342,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return STI.getSPReg();`" LLVM,RISCV,1343,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `ScalableVector` class and the context in which the code is being executed. However, based on the syntax and the fact that the `ScalableVector` class is being used to store a stack of IDs, it is likely that the next statement will be related to the manipulation of the stack, such as pushing or popping elements from the stack." LLVM,RISCV,1344,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of the code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `getStackIDForScalableVectors` method and the values of the variables involved. However, based on the name of the method and the context in which it is being called, it is likely that the next statement will be a call to the `getStackIDForScalableVectors` method, which will return the stack ID for scalable vectors. The returned stack ID will then be used to retrieve the stack frame for the current function, which will be stored in the `" LLVM,RISCV,1345,"The next statement after the `return` statement in the code snippet is the `alignTo` function call. The `alignTo` function takes two arguments: the first is the size of the stack plus the padding required for the return value, and the second is the alignment of the stack. The function returns the aligned value of the stack size. Therefore, the next statement after the `return` statement is: ``` alignTo(MFI.getStackSize() + RVFI->getRVVPadding(), getStackAlign()); ```" LLVM,RISCV,1346,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return ( MFI . hasVarSizedObjects ( ) || ( ! hasReservedCallFrame ( MF ) && ( ! MFI . isMaxCallFrameSizeComputed ( ) || MFI . getMaxCallFrameSize ( ) != ) ) ) && TRI -> hasStackRealignment ( MF ) ;` This statement is a return statement that returns a boolean value indicating whether the current function has a stack realignment or not. The return value is computed based on the values of various function attributes," LLVM,RISCV,1347,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet without knowing the specific values of the variables and functions being used. However, based on the syntax and structure of the code, it appears to be a conditional statement that is checking multiple conditions before returning a value. The first condition checks if the `MFI` object has variable-sized objects or not. If it does, the condition is true and the next condition is checked. The second condition checks if the `MF` object has a reserved call frame or not. If it does not, the condition is true and the next condition is checked" LLVM,RISCV,1348,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet without knowing the context and the specific implementation of the functions and variables involved. However, based on the syntax and the names of the functions and variables, it appears that the code is checking various conditions related to the target of the machine function (MF) and its options. The first condition checks if the target of the MF has the option to disable frame pointer elimination. The second condition checks if the target of the MF has stack realignment. The third condition checks if the MF has variable-sized objects. The fourth condition checks if the" LLVM,RISCV,1349,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return MF.getTarget().Options.DisableFramePointerElim(MF) || RegInfo->hasStackRealignment(MF) || MFI.hasVarSizedObjects() || MFI.isFrameAddressTaken();` This statement is a return statement that returns a boolean value indicating whether the frame pointer elimination optimization should be disabled for the current machine function. The return value is determined by a combination of several factors, including the target architecture, the presence of stack realignment, the presence of variable-sized objects," LLVM,RISCV,1350,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the code depends on the specific implementation of the `MachineFunction` class and the `hasReservedCallFrame` method. However, based on the name of the method and the context in which it is being called, it is likely that the next statement will check if the `MachineFunction` has a reserved call frame, and return a boolean value indicating whether or not it does. Here is a possible next statement: ``` return MF.hasReservedCallFrame(); ``` This statement" LLVM,RISCV,1351,"The next statement after the code snippet you provided is: `return false;` This is because the code snippet you provided is a conditional statement that returns `true` if certain conditions are met, and `false` otherwise. If the conditions are not met, the function will return `false`." LLVM,RISCV,1352,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `MF` class and the `getSubtarget` method. However, based on the syntax and the context of the code, it is likely that the next statement will be a call to a method on the `Subtarget` object returned by the `getSubtarget` method. For example, the next statement could be a call to the `hasVInstructions` method of the `Subtarget` object, which would return a boolean value indicating whether the subtarget has any V" LLVM,RISCV,1353,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `MF` class and the `getSubtarget` method. However, based on the syntax and the context of the code, it is likely that the next statement will be a call to a method on the `Subtarget` object returned by the `getSubtarget` method. For example, the next statement could be a call to the `hasVInstructions` method of the `Subtarget` object, which would return a boolean value indicating whether the subtarget has any V" LLVM,RISCV,1354,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return any_of(MF, [&TII](const MachineBasicBlock &MBB) { return any_of(MBB, [&TII](const MachineInstr &MI) { return TII.isRVVSpill(MI, true); }); });` This statement is a call to the `any_of` function, which takes two arguments: a machine function `MF` and a lambda function that takes a machine basic block `MBB` as an argument. The lambda function returns `true` if" LLVM,RISCV,1355,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return any_of(MF, [&TII](const MachineBasicBlock &MBB) { return any_of(MBB, [&TII](const MachineInstr &MI) { return TII.isRVVSpill(MI, true); }); });` This statement is a call to the `any_of` function, which takes two arguments: a machine function `MF` and a lambda function that takes a machine basic block `MBB` as an argument. The lambda function returns `true` if" LLVM,RISCV,1356,"The next statement after the `case TargetStackID :: NoAlloc :` is `return false;`. The `switch` statement is checking the value of `ID` against the values of the `TargetStackID` enum. If `ID` matches any of the `case` statements, the corresponding code block is executed. In this case, if `ID` is equal to `TargetStackID :: Default`, `TargetStackID :: ScalableVector`, or `TargetStackID :: NoAlloc`, the function returns `true`. If `ID` is not equal to any of these values, the" LLVM,RISCV,1357,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `Size = Info.getSize();`. This is because the `for` loop is iterating over the `CalleeSavedInfo` object, which is a collection of `Info` objects. The `Info` object has a `getSize()` method that returns the size of the callee-saved register. The `Size` variable is being assigned the size of the current `Info` object in the loop." LLVM,RISCV,1358,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `TII.loadRegFromStackSlot(MBB, MI, Reg, CS.getFrameIdx(), RC, TRI);` This statement loads a register from a stack slot using the `loadRegFromStackSlot` method of the `TargetInstrInfo` class. The method takes several parameters: * `MBB`: the machine basic block where the instruction is located * `MI`: the machine instruction that loads the register * `Reg`: the register to be loaded * `CS.getFrameIdx" LLVM,RISCV,1359,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific values of the variables and the behavior of the functions called. However, based on the code snippet, it appears that the next statement will be a call to the `storeRegToStackSlot` function, which is a member of the `TargetInstrInfo` class. This function is used to store a register value to a stack slot, and it takes several parameters, including the register to be stored, the stack slot to store it in, and the target register class to use. The next statement is" LLVM,RISCV,1360,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty because the behavior of the code depends on the specific values of the variables and the implementation of the functions called. However, based on the context and the patterns in the code, it appears that the next statement will be: `BuildMI(MBB, MBBI, DL, TII->get(), DestReg).addReg(SrcReg).addImm(Val).setMIFlag(Flag);` This is because the code is checking if `Val` is less than a" LLVM,RISCV,1361,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it appears to be part of a larger function and the context is not provided. However, based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the next statement will be an `else` statement, as the previous `if` statement has an `else if` clause. The `else` statement will be executed if the condition `isInt < > ( Val )` is not true. The `else` statement will likely contain a call to the `report_fatal_error` function, as the" LLVM,RISCV,1362,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific values of the variables and the behavior of the functions being called. However, based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the next statement will be the start of a for loop, where the variable `i` is initialized to the value `0`. The loop will continue until `i` is greater than or equal to the value `16`, and the loop body will be executed for each value of `i` in this range. Within the loop body, the code will set the value of the" LLVM,RISCV,1363,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `for (unsigned i = 0; i < CSRegs.size(); ++i) {` This is a for loop that iterates over the elements of the `CSRegs` array, which is an array of `MCPhysReg` objects. The loop variable `i` is initialized to 0 and incremented by 1 on each iteration until it reaches the size of the `CSRegs` array. The loop body is not shown in the code snippet, but it likely sets the `SavedRegs` bit vector" LLVM,RISCV,1364,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be: `MFI->setStackSize(FrameSize);` This is because the previous line of code sets the `FrameSize` variable to the aligned stack size, and the next line of code sets the stack size of the machine function (MFI) to the aligned stack size." LLVM,RISCV,1365,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `FrameSize = alignTo(FrameSize, StackAlign);` This statement aligns the frame size to the stack alignment using the `alignTo` function. The `alignTo` function takes two arguments: the first is the value to be aligned, and the second is the alignment value. In this case, the value to be aligned is `FrameSize`, and the alignment value is `StackAlign`. The function returns the aligned value, which is then assigned to `FrameSize`." LLVM,RISCV,1366,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific values of the variables and the behavior of the functions called. However, based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the next statement will be: `adjustReg(MBB, MI, DL, SPReg, SPReg, Amount, MachineInstr::NoFlags);` This is because the `if` statement that precedes this line checks whether `Amount` is not equal to a specific value (``). If this condition is true, then the" LLVM,RISCV,1367,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return MBB.erase(MI);` This statement is outside the `if` block, so it will be executed regardless of the condition `Amount != `. It erases the instruction `MI` from the basic block `MBB`." LLVM,RISCV,1368,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `MachineFrameInfo` and `MachineFunctionInfo` classes, as well as the values of the variables `MF`, `MBBI`, and `RI`. However, based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the next statement is likely to be a call to the `getCalleeSavedInfo` method of the `MachineFrameInfo` class, which returns a reference to a `CalleeSavedInfo` object. The `CalleeSavedInfo`" LLVM,RISCV,1369,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be: `for (const CalleeSavedInfo &CSI : CSI) {` This is because the code is iterating over the `CalleeSavedInfo` objects in the `CSI` vector, and the `for` loop is a common way to iterate over the elements of a vector in C++. The loop variable `CSI` is a reference to the current `CalleeSavedInfo` object being processed, and the loop body will likely perform some operation on this object." LLVM,RISCV,1370,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `adjustReg(MBB, MBBI, DL, SPReg, SPReg, -StackSize, MachineInstr::FrameSetup);` This statement adjusts the register `SPReg` by subtracting `StackSize` from it, and sets the frame setup for the machine instruction. The `adjustReg` function is called with the following arguments: * `MBB`: The machine basic block that contains the instruction. * `MBBI`: The machine basic block instruction that contains the instruction. * `DL`: The data" LLVM,RISCV,1371,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the code depends on the specific values of the variables and the implementation of the `getFPReg` function. However, based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the `getFPReg` function is intended to return a register number that is used for floating-point operations. The function takes a `Subtarget` object as an argument, which contains information about the target architecture and the current instruction being executed. The function first checks if the `Subtarget` object has a `hasFPReg`" LLVM,RISCV,1372,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `getStackIDForScalableVectors` method and the `TargetStackID` class. However, based on the information provided, it is likely that the next statement will be a return statement that returns a `TargetStackID` object representing the stack ID for scalable vectors." LLVM,RISCV,1373,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet without knowing the context and the possible values of `TargetStackID`. However, based on the syntax and the fact that the code is using the `case` keyword, it appears that the next statement will be a block of code that will be executed if `TargetStackID` is equal to `Default` or if it is equal to a value that is represented by the `Vector` token." LLVM,RISCV,1374,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `RC = &RegInfo->getRegClassForKind(TargetRegisterKind::RIP);` Explanation: The code snippet is part of a function called `processFunctionBeforeFrameFinalized` in a class called `FrameLowering`. The function takes two arguments: a `MachineFunction` object called `MF`, and a `RegScavenger` object called `RS`. The function uses the `getSubtarget` method of the `MF` object to get a `TargetRegisterInfo` object, which it then uses to" LLVM,RISCV,1375,"It is difficult to determine the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific values of the variables and the implementation of the functions being called. However, based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the next statement will be a call to the `CreateStackObject` method of the `MFI` object, passing in the spill size and alignment of the register class as arguments. The return value of this method is then assigned to the `RegScavFI` variable." LLVM,RISCV,1376,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `TargetFrameLowering(StackGrowsDown, Align(NUM_LIT), NUM_LIT)` This statement is calling the constructor of the `TargetFrameLowering` class, passing in the `StackGrowsDown` flag, the result of the `Align` function with `NUM_LIT` as an argument, and `NUM_LIT` as a second argument. The `TargetFrameLowering` class is a base class for the `FrameLowering` class, and this constructor call is initializing the `Target" LLVM,RISCV,1377,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `TargetFrameLowering(StackGrowsDown, Align(NUM_LIT), NUM_LIT)` This statement is calling the constructor of the `TargetFrameLowering` class, passing in the `StackGrowsDown` flag, the result of the `Align` function with `NUM_LIT` as an argument, and `NUM_LIT` as a second argument. The `TargetFrameLowering` class is a base class for the `FrameLowering` class, and this constructor call is initializing the `Target" LLVM,RISCV,1378,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `Offset = alignTo(Offset + ObjectSize, );` This statement aligns the offset to the next multiple of ``. The `alignTo` function is called with the current offset plus the size of the current object, and the result is then aligned to the next multiple of ``. The updated offset is then stored in the `Offset` variable." LLVM,RISCV,1379,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `Offset = alignTo(Offset + ObjectSize, );` This statement aligns the offset to the next multiple of ``. The `alignTo` function is called with the current offset plus the size of the current object, and the result is assigned back to the `Offset` variable." LLVM,RISCV,1380,"The next statement of this code snippet is: MFI.setStackSize(FrameSize);" LLVM,RISCV,1381,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific input and the behavior of the functions called within the snippet. However, based on the code provided, it appears that the snippet is attempting to determine the last instruction in a machine basic block that destroys the frame, and then uses that information to update the calling convention of the function. The snippet first retrieves the frame information for the current machine function using the `getFrameInfo` method. It then retrieves the calling convention of the function using the `getCallingConv` method and checks if" LLVM,RISCV,1382,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be: `uint64_t SecondSPAdjustAmount = MFI.getStackSize() - FirstSPAdjustAmount;` This is because the previous statement is `uint64_t FirstSPAdjustAmount = getFirstSPAdjustAmount(MF);`, which assigns the value of `getFirstSPAdjustAmount(MF)` to `FirstSPAdjustAmount`. The next statement is likely to be the calculation of `SecondSPAdjustAmount` using the value of `FirstSPAdjustAmount`." LLVM,RISCV,1383,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific values of the variables and the behavior of the functions called. However, based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the next statement will be: `if ( hasFP ( MF ) ) {` This is because the previous `if` statement was not taken, so the control flow will continue to the next `if` statement. The `hasFP` function is called on the `MF` object, and if it returns `true`, the code inside the `if` statement will" LLVM,RISCV,1384,"The next statement of the code snippet is: `RS->addScavengingFrameIndex(RegScavFI);` This statement adds the scavenging frame index `RegScavFI` to the `RS` object, which is an instance of the `RegScav` class. The `addScavengingFrameIndex` method is called on `RS` with the `RegScavFI` argument, which is the result of the `CreateStackObject` method called on the `MFI` object with the `RegInfo` and `RC` arguments. The `Create" LLVM,RISCV,1385,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `RVFI->setCalleeSavedStackSize(Size);`" LLVM,RISCV,1386,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return true;` This is because the `if` statement checks if the `hasOptNone()` method of the `MF` object returns `true`. If it does, the method returns `false`. Otherwise, it returns `true`." LLVM,RISCV,1387,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return true;` This is because the `if` statement checks if the `hasOptNone()` method of the `MF` object returns `true`. If it does, the method returns `false`. Otherwise, it returns `true`." LLVM,RISCV,1388,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return MFI.hasVarSizedObjects() && TRI->hasStackRealignment(MF);` This statement is a boolean expression that checks if the machine function `MFI` has variable-sized objects and if the target register info `TRI` has stack realignment. If both conditions are true, the function returns `true`, otherwise it returns `false`." LLVM,RISCV,1389,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the code depends on the specific implementation of the `MachineFrameInfo` and `TargetRegisterInfo` classes, as well as the values of the variables `MF` and `STI`. However, based on the names of the variables and the methods being called, it is likely that the next statement of the code will be a call to a method on the `TargetRegisterInfo` object, such as `getRegisterInfo()` or `getRegisterName()`. The purpose of this method is likely to retrieve information about" LLVM,RISCV,1390,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return true;` Explanation: The code snippet is a loop that iterates over the object indices in the `MachineFrameInfo` object `MFI`. The loop starts at the index `` and ends at the index `MFI.getObjectIndexEnd()`. The loop increments the index `I` by 1 at each iteration. Inside the loop, the code checks if the stack ID of the current object index `I` is equal to the `TargetStackID::ScalableVector` constant." LLVM,RISCV,1391,"The next statement after the `if` statement in the code snippet you provided is: ``` return false; ``` This statement will be executed if the condition in the `if` statement is not met, i.e., if the `hasStdExtV()` method of the `Subtarget` object returned by the `getSubtarget()` method of the `MF` object does not return `true`." LLVM,RISCV,1392,"This code snippet appears to be part of a function that is responsible for restoring the stack frame after a function call. It is using the LLVM API to generate machine code instructions. The code is checking if the current stack frame is empty, and if so, it returns true. If the stack frame is not empty, it gets the parent function and the target instruction info for the current function. It then checks if the current instruction is a debug instruction, and if not, it gets the debug location. The code then gets the non-libcall call site information for the current function and reverses it." LLVM,RISCV,1393,"Based on the code snippet provided, it appears to be a part of a function that is loading registers from stack slots. The function is using the `TargetInstrInfo` and `TargetRegisterClass` classes to get information about the registers and stack slots. The next statement is likely to be a call to `TII.loadRegFromStackSlot()` to load a register from a stack slot. The function is passing the `MBB` (MachineBasicBlock), `MI` (MachineInstr), `Reg` (Register), `CS.getFrameIdx()` (Frame Index), `" LLVM,RISCV,1394,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `this->setTargetSubtarget(&STI);` This is because the `FrameLowering` constructor is initializing the `TargetFrameLowering` base class with the `StackGrowsDown` flag, and the `ISA_LIT` and `NUM_LIT` values passed as arguments to the constructor. The `setTargetSubtarget` method is then called to set the target subtarget for the frame lowering." LLVM,RISCV,1395,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `this->setTargetSubtarget(&STI);` This is because the `FrameLowering` constructor is initializing the `TargetFrameLowering` base class with the `StackGrowsDown` flag, and the `ISA_LIT` and `NUM_LIT` values passed as arguments to the constructor. The `setTargetSubtarget` method is then called to set the target subtarget for the frame lowering." LLVM,RISCV,1396,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be: `BuildMI(MBB, MI, DL, TII.get(), ).addExternalSymbol(SpillLibCall, ).setMIFlag(MachineInstr::FrameSetup);` This statement is building a `MachineInstr` object using the `BuildMI` function, and adding an external symbol to it using the `addExternalSymbol` method. The external symbol is the spill library call name, which is obtained using the" LLVM,RISCV,1397,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be: `uint64_t StackBase = MFI.getStackBase();` This is because the `getStackBase()` method is typically used to retrieve the base address of the stack frame, which is the starting address of the stack. The `getStackSize()` method is used to retrieve the size of the stack, which is the number of bytes that the stack can hold. Therefore, the next statement is likely to be retrieving the base address of the stack frame, which is the starting address of the stack." LLVM,RISCV,1398,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `uint64_t FrameSize = alignTo(MFI.getStackSize(), StackAlign);`" LLVM,RISCV,1399,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `uint64_t SecondSPAdjustAmount = MFI.getStackSize() - FirstSPAdjustAmount;`" LLVM,RISCV,1400,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific inputs and the behavior of the functions called within the code. However, based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the next statement will be the start of a loop that adjusts the stack pointer register (SPReg) based on the stack size and other factors. The loop will iterate over the instructions in the machine basic block (MBB) and adjust the stack pointer register accordingly. The specific adjustments made to the stack pointer register will depend on the values of various variables and the behavior of the functions called within the" LLVM,RISCV,1401,"The next statement of the code snippet is: `MFI.setMaxCallFrameSize(MaxCallSize);`" LLVM,RISCV,1402,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `adjustReg(MBB, LastFrameDestroy, DL, SPReg, FPReg, -FPOffset, MachineInstr::FrameDestroy);` This statement is calling the `adjustReg` function with the following arguments: * `MBB`: The current machine basic block. * `LastFrameDestroy`: The last frame destroy instruction in the current machine basic block. * `DL`: The debug location of the current instruction. * `SPReg`: The stack pointer register. * `FPReg`:" LLVM,RISCV,1403,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `if ( FirstSPAdjustAmount ) StackSize = FirstSPAdjustAmount ;` This statement is executed if the `FirstSPAdjustAmount` variable is non-zero, which means that the stack needs to be adjusted. The `StackSize` variable is then set to the value of `FirstSPAdjustAmount`, which is the amount by which the stack needs to be adjusted." LLVM,RISCV,1404,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `BuildMI(MBB, MBBI, DL, TII->get(TargetOpcode::CFI_INSTRUCTION)).addCFIIndex(CFIIndex);` This statement is adding a call frame instruction (CFI) to the machine instruction being built. The CFI instruction is created using the `MCCFIInstruction::createDefCfaOffset` method, which takes a null pointer and a negative stack size as arguments. The resulting CFI instruction is then added to the machine instruction using the `addCFIIndex`" LLVM,RISCV,1405,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet as it is a complex piece of code that involves several functions and variables. However, based on the context, it appears that the code is related to stack frame management and exception handling. The code snippet is part of a larger function that is responsible for creating a stack frame for a function. The function takes a `MachineFunction` object as an argument, which represents the function being compiled, and a `MachineBasicBlock` object, which represents the basic block being compiled. The function uses the `MachineInstr` class to create instructions that manipulate the stack frame" LLVM,RISCV,1406,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific values of the variables and the behavior of the functions involved. However, based on the information provided, it is likely that the next statement will be: `StackAlign = getStackAlignment(); if ( ! isInt < > ( StackSize ) && ( CSI . size ( ) > ) ) {` This is because the `getStackAlignment()` function is called to get the stack alignment, and the `isInt()` function" LLVM,RISCV,1407,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the implementation of the `MachineFrameInfo` class and the `getFrameInfo()` method. However, based on the naming conventions used in the code snippet, it is likely that the `getFrameInfo()` method returns a reference to a `MachineFrameInfo` object that contains information about the current machine frame. Therefore, the next statement of this code snippet is likely to be a call to a method or function that uses the `MachineFrameInfo` object returned by `getFrameInfo()` to perform some" LLVM,RISCV,1408,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `FrameReg = ;` This is because the `if` statement that precedes it checks whether `FI` is within the range of `MinCSFI` and `MaxCSFI`, and if it is, it sets `FrameReg` to ``. If `FI` is not within that range, it checks whether `RI` needs stack realignment and whether `FI` is a fixed object index. If those conditions are met, it sets `FrameReg` to ``" LLVM,RISCV,1409,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return false;` Explanation: The first `if` statement checks if the `useSaveRestoreLibCalls` function is not being used. If it is not being used, the function returns `true`. The second `if` statement checks if the size of the successor block is greater than a certain value (represented by ``). If it is, the function returns `false`. Since the first `if` statement is not being executed (because `useSaveRestoreLibCalls" LLVM,RISCV,1410,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be: `RS.scavengeRegisters(*TmpMBB);` This is because the `RegScavenger` class has a method called `scavengeRegisters` that takes a `MachineBasicBlock` as an argument, and the code snippet is likely to be using this method to scavenge registers in the current basic block." LLVM,RISCV,1411,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return true;` Explanation: The code snippet is checking if the `useSaveRestoreLibCalls` flag is set in the `MachineFunctionInfo` object. If it is not set, the function returns `true`." LLVM,RISCV,1412,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet without knowing the context and the purpose of the code. However, based on the code snippet provided, it appears to be related to the manipulation of a machine frame and the generation of debug information. The code snippet defines several variables, including `RI`, `MFI`, `RVFI`, `FPReg`, `SPReg`, `MBBI`, and `DL`. It also defines a constant `CSI` and a variable `LastFrameDestroy`. The code snippet then checks if the machine basic block is empty, and if not," LLVM,RISCV,1413,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `const auto & CSI = getNonLibcallCSI ( MFI . getCalleeSavedInfo ( ) ) ;` This line declares a constant reference to a `CalleeSavedInfo` object, which is obtained by calling the `getNonLibcallCSI` function on the `CalleeSavedInfo` object returned by the `getCalleeSavedInfo` method of the `MFI` object." LLVM,RISCV,1414,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be: `const RegisterInfo * RI = STI . getRegisterInfo ( ) ;` This statement is assigning the result of the `getRegisterInfo()` method of the `STI` object to a constant pointer variable named `RI`. The `getRegisterInfo()` method is likely to return a pointer to a `RegisterInfo` object, which is a class that contains information about a register in the target ISA. The `RI` variable is then used in the subsequent code snippet to access the register information." LLVM,RISCV,1415,"Based on the code snippet you provided, it appears to be a part of a function that is trying to determine the maximum register used in a function. The function takes a `MachineFunctionInfo` object as an argument, and it appears to be using the `useSaveRestoreLibCalls` method to determine whether or not to use a library call to save or restore registers. The code snippet you provided is incomplete, so it's difficult to say for certain what the next statement will be. However, based on the context, it's likely that the next statement will be a `return` statement that returns" LLVM,RISCV,1416,"Based on the code snippet you provided, it appears to be a part of a function that is trying to determine the maximum register value among a set of registers. The function takes a `CSI` object as an argument, which is likely a container of some sort that holds the registers. The function first initializes a `MaxReg` variable to a string literal, which is likely a default value. It then iterates over the registers in the `CSI` object using a `for` loop, and for each register, it checks if the register's frame index is less than a certain value. If the" LLVM,RISCV,1417,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `Offset += RVFI->getVarArgsSaveSize();`" LLVM,RISCV,1418,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific inputs and the behavior of the functions being called. However, based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the next statement will be the start of a loop that iterates over the elements of the `CSRegs` array. The loop will check if the current element of the `CSRegs` array is a callee-saved register, and if so, it will add it to the `SavedRegs` set. The loop will continue until all elements of the `CSRegs`" LLVM,RISCV,1419,"Based on the code snippet you provided, it appears that the next statement will be: `FrameSize = alignTo(FrameSize, TRI->getSpillAlignment());` This statement is assigning the result of the `alignTo` function to the `FrameSize` variable, using the current value of `FrameSize` and the spill alignment of the target stack ID. The `alignTo` function is used to align the frame size to a specific boundary, which is determined by the spill alignment of the target stack ID." LLVM,RISCV,1420,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `FPOffset = RealStackSize - RVFI->getVarArgsSaveSize();`" LLVM,RISCV,1421,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty because it depends on the specific values of the variables and the behavior of the functions called. However, based on the context and the code structure, it appears that the next statement will be: `Offset += MFI.getStackSize();` This is because the `else` clause of the `if` statement is executed when `RI->needsStackRealignment(MF)` is `true` and `!MFI.isFixedObjectIndex(FI)` is `true`. In this case, the `Offset`" LLVM,RISCV,1422,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet without knowing the specific values of the variables and functions used in the code. However, based on the context, it appears that the code is trying to determine the frame register and offset for a given function. The code first retrieves the non-libcall CSI (callee-saved information) for the function, and then calculates the minimum and maximum callee-saved frame indices (MinCSFI and MaxCSFI). It then calculates the offset for the current frame index (FI) based on the object offset and offset adjustment." LLVM,RISCV,1423,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet without knowing the context and the specific implementation of the `MachineFunctionInfo` class. However, based on the syntax and the naming conventions used in the code, it appears that the `getInfo` method is being called on the `MF` object to retrieve an instance of the `MachineFunctionInfo` class. The `auto` keyword is used to declare a variable that is automatically deduced to be of the type returned by the `getInfo` method. The `` template parameter is used to specify the type of the" LLVM,RISCV,1424,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return ( ( MFI . hasVarSizedObjects ( ) || RVFI -> hasSpillVRs ( ) ) && TRI -> needsStackRealignment ( MF ) ) ;` This statement is a return statement that returns a boolean value indicating whether the current machine function needs stack realignment. The return value is determined by the logical AND of two conditions: 1. `MFI . hasVarSizedObjects ( )`: This condition checks if the current machine function has any variable-sized objects. 2." LLVM,RISCV,1425,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet without knowing the specific implementation of the `MachineFunctionInfo` and `MachineFrameInfo` classes, as well as the context in which this code is being executed. However, based on the names of the classes and the methods being called, it is likely that the next statement will involve the `MachineFunctionInfo` object, which is being retrieved from the `MachineFunction` object using the `getInfo` method. The `MachineFrameInfo` object is also being retrieved from the `MachineFunction` object using the `getFrameInfo` method." LLVM,RISCV,1426,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific values of the variables and the behavior of the functions being called. However, based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the next statement after the `if` statement will be the `int RegScavFI = MFI.CreateStackObject(...)` statement. This is because the `if` statement checks whether the stack ID of the current frame is equal to the target stack ID, and if it is not, it sets the `HasSpillVRs` flag to `true`. If the" LLVM,RISCV,1427,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific values of the variables and the implementation of the functions called. However, based on the code provided, it appears that the next statement will be: `BuildMI(MBB, MBBI, DL, TII->get(Opc), SPReg).addReg(SPReg).addReg(FactorRegister, RegState::Kill).setMIFlag(Flag);` This statement is likely to be a call to the `BuildMI` function, which is defined in the `" LLVM,RISCV,1428,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `SavedRegs.set(CSRegs[i]);` This statement sets the value of `SavedRegs` to the value of `CSRegs[i]`. The `set` method is called on the `SavedRegs` object, passing in the value of `CSRegs[i]` as an argument." LLVM,RISCV,1429,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `if ( ! hasReservedCallFrame ( MF ) ) { ... }` This is because the `assert` statement is a no-op in the context of the code snippet, and the `if` statement is the next statement that is executed." LLVM,RISCV,1430,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `if (FirstSPAdjustAmount != 0) {`" LLVM,RISCV,1431,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `getFPReg` method and the values of the variables used in the method. However, based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the method is trying to retrieve the frame pointer register (FPReg) for the current stack frame. The method first checks if the target ABI (Application Binary Interface) is a 32-bit or 64-bit ABI. If it is a 32-bit ABI, the method returns the frame pointer register for the" LLVM,RISCV,1432,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return ;` Explanation: The `getSPReg` method is a const method, which means it does not modify the object it is called on. It returns the value of the `SPReg` field, which is a string literal. The method checks if the target ABI is ""STI"" (which is a string literal), and if it is, it returns the string literal """". If the target ABI is not ""STI"", the method returns the string literal ""copyImplicitOps(*MF, *MI);`. This statement is copying the implicit operands from the original machine instruction `MI` to the new machine instruction `NewMI`. The `copyImplicitOps` method is used to copy the implicit operands, which are operands that are not explicitly mentioned in the instruction but are required for its execution. This is typically the case for instructions that operate on the stack or other implicit memory locations. The `copyImplicitOps` method takes two arguments: the first" LLVM,RISCV,1435,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific values of the variables and the behavior of the functions called. However, based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the next statement will be: `const TargetRegisterClass * RC = TRI -> getMinimalPhysRegClass ( Reg ) ;` This statement is likely to be executed for each element in the `NonLibcallCSI` vector, which is a vector of `CallSite` objects. The `getMinimalPhysRegClass` function is called on each `CallSite" LLVM,RISCV,1436,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return - StackAlign;` Explanation: The code snippet is checking if the stack size is not an integer and if the number of callee-saved registers is greater than a certain value. If both conditions are true, then the function returns a value that is the difference between the stack size and the stack alignment." LLVM,RISCV,1437,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be: `uint64_t StackOffset = StackSize - StackAlign;` This is because the code is calculating the offset of the stack pointer from the top of the stack, and it needs to know the size of the stack and the alignment of the stack to do so. The `StackSize` variable is already defined, and the `StackAlign` variable is being calculated using the `getStackAlignment()` function. The `StackOffset` variable is then being calculated by subtracting the `StackAlign` from the `StackSize`." LLVM,RISCV,1438,"Based on the code snippet provided, it is difficult to predict the next statement with certainty. However, we can make an educated guess based on the context and the patterns we see in the code. The code appears to be related to stack frame manipulation, and it seems to be handling the case where the current frame index (FI) is greater than or equal to the minimum frame index (MinCSFI) and less than or equal to the maximum frame index (MaxCSFI). If this is the case, then the next statement is likely to be an assignment to the FrameReg variable, which is a register that" LLVM,RISCV,1439,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific values of the variables and the behavior of the functions being called. However, based on the context and the structure of the code, it appears that the next statement will be: `FrameReg = RI->getFrameRegister(MF);` This is because the `if` statement that precedes this line checks whether `FI` is less than a certain value, and if it is, it sets `FrameReg` to a specific value. If `FI` is greater than or equal to" LLVM,RISCV,1440,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be: `uint64_t SecondSPAdjustAmount = MFI . getStackSize ( ) - FirstSPAdjustAmount ;` This is because the previous statement in the code snippet is `uint64_t FirstSPAdjustAmount = getFirstSPAdjustAmount ( MF ) ;`, which sets the value of `FirstSPAdjustAmount` to the result of the `getFirstSPAdjustAmount` function called with the `MF` argument. The next statement is likely to be the calculation of the `Second" LLVM,RISCV,1441,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `if ( hasBP ( MF ) ) { BuildMI ( MBB , MBBI , DL , TII -> get ( ) , BPReg ) . addReg ( SPReg ) . addImm ( ) ; }` This statement is part of the `if ( hasFP ( MF ) ) { ... }` block, which is executed if the function has a frame pointer (FP). The `hasBP` function checks if the function has a base pointer (BP" LLVM,RISCV,1442,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `unsigned CFIIndex = MF.addFrameInst(MCCFIInstruction::createDefCfaOffset(nullptr, -MFI.getStackSize()));` This statement adds a new frame instruction to the machine function `MF` using the `addFrameInst` method, and creates a new `MCCFIInstruction` object using the `createDefCfaOffset` method. The `createDefCfaOffset` method creates a new `MCCFIInstruction` object that represents a definition of the Canonical Frame" LLVM,RISCV,1443,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet without knowing the specific implementation of the `emitEpilogue` method in the `FrameLowering` class. However, based on the name of the method and the parameters it takes, it is likely that the next statement will be related to the epilogue of the function being generated. The epilogue is the part of the function that is executed after the main body of the function has completed. It is typically used to restore the stack frame and return control to the caller. Some possible next statements could include: * Restoring" LLVM,RISCV,1444,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet without knowing the specific implementation of the `emitEpilogue` method in the `FrameLowering` class. However, based on the name of the method and the parameters it takes, it is likely that the next statement will be related to the epilogue of the function being generated. The epilogue is the part of the function that is executed after the main body of the function has completed. It is typically used to restore the stack frame and return control to the caller. Some possible next statements could include: * Restoring" LLVM,RISCV,1445,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the code depends on the specific inputs and the implementation of the `MachineFunction` and `MachineBasicBlock` classes. However, based on the name of the function and the parameters it takes, it is likely that this function is responsible for generating the prologue code for a function. The prologue code is the code that is executed at the beginning of a function, and it typically includes setting up the stack frame, saving registers, and allocating space for local variables. Therefore, the next" LLVM,RISCV,1446,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the code depends on the specific inputs and the implementation of the `MachineFunction` and `MachineBasicBlock` classes. However, based on the name of the function and the parameters it takes, it is likely that this function is responsible for generating the prologue code for a function. The prologue code is the code that is executed at the beginning of a function, and it typically includes setting up the stack frame, saving registers, and allocating space for local variables. Therefore, the next" LLVM,RISCV,1447,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return true;` This statement is the last statement in the `hasFP` function, and it returns a boolean value indicating whether the function has a frame pointer or not. In this case, the function always returns `true`, indicating that it has a frame pointer." LLVM,RISCV,1448,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `BuildMI(MBB, MBBI, DL, TII->get(TargetOpcode::CFI_INSTRUCTION)).addCFIIndex(CFIIndex);` This statement creates a new machine instruction using the `BuildMI` function, which takes the current basic block, the current machine instruction, the data layout, and the target opcode as arguments. The target opcode is obtained using the `TII->get` method, which returns the opcode for the `CFI_INSTRUCTION` instruction. The `" LLVM,RISCV,1449,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific values of the variables and the implementation of the `MachineFrameInfo` and `TargetRegisterInfo` classes. However, based on the context and the names of the variables, it appears that the next statement is likely to be a call to the `getRegisterInfo` method of the `MachineFrameInfo` class, which returns a `TargetRegisterInfo` object representing the register information for the machine frame." LLVM,RISCV,1450,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet without knowing the context and the purpose of the code. However, based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the code is working with a machine frame and register information. The code defines a constant pointer to a `TargetRegisterInfo` structure called `RegInfo`, which is obtained from the `getSubtarget()` method of the `MachineFrame` object `MF`. The `getRegisterInfo()` method is then called on `RegInfo` to obtain a reference to a `MachineFrameInfo` object called `MFI`. The code then" LLVM,RISCV,1451,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `BuildMI` and `addReg` functions, as well as the values of the variables `MBB`, `MBBI`, `DL`, `TII`, `Opc`, and `SPReg`. However, based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the next statement after the `addReg` function call is likely to be a call to the `BuildMI` function, as the `BuildMI` function is called with the same arguments as the previous call, except that" LLVM,RISCV,1452,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it appears to be a part of a larger program and the context is not provided. However, based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the next statement could be: * `Register FactorRegister = TII -> getVLENFactoredAmount ( MF , MBB , MBBI , DL , Amount ) ;` This statement is assigning the result of the `getVLENFactoredAmount` method to the `FactorRegister` variable. The method takes several arguments, including `M" LLVM,RISCV,1453,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific inputs and the behavior of the functions called within the code. However, based on the code provided, it appears that the next statement will be: `uint64_t RVVStackSize = RVFI->getRVVStackSize();` This is because the previous statement, `uint64_t FPOffset = RealStackSize - RVFI->getVarArgsSaveSize();`, sets the value of `FPOffset` to the result of subtracting the value returned" LLVM,RISCV,1454,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be: `uint64_t FirstSPAdjustAmount = getFirstSPAdjustAmount(MF);` This is because the code snippet ends with a call to `getFirstSPAdjustAmount(MF)`, which is likely to return a `uint64_t` value that is assigned to `FirstSPAdjustAmount`. The next statement is likely to be a use of this value, such as a comparison or an arithmetic operation." LLVM,RISCV,1455,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `if ( hasFP ( MF ) ) {` This is because the code snippet ends with a conditional statement that checks if the `MF` object has a floating-point (FP) register. If the `MF` object does have an FP register, then the code inside the `if` block will be executed." LLVM,RISCV,1456,The next statement after the `return true` statement is the `case TargetStackID :: NoAlloc` statement. LLVM,RISCV,1457,"The next statement of the code snippet is: `Size += RegInfo->getSpillSize(*RC);` Explanation: The code snippet is creating a stack frame for a function call, and it is initializing the size of the stack frame based on the size of the callee-saved registers. The `Size` variable is initialized to a constant value, and then it is incremented by the size of each callee-saved register. The `RegInfo->getSpillSize(*RC)` function returns the size of the spill area for the current register, and it is added" LLVM,RISCV,1458,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `SavedRegs.set();`. This is because the `determineCalleeSaves` method is called on the `TargetFrameLowering` object, which sets the `SavedRegs` bit vector to the callee-saved registers for the target machine. The `if` statement checks if the function has a frame pointer (FP) and, if so, sets the `SavedRegs` bit vector to include the frame pointer register." LLVM,RISCV,1459,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet without knowing the specific implementation of the `TargetFrameLowering` class and the `determineCalleeSaves` method. However, based on the naming conventions and the context of the code, it is likely that the next statement will involve updating the `SavedRegs` and `RS` variables based on the information returned by the `determineCalleeSaves` method. Here is a possible next statement: ``` SavedRegs = SavedRegs + determineCalleeSaves(MF" LLVM,RISCV,1460,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `assert(hasFP(MF) && );` This statement is an assertion that checks if the current function has a frame pointer (FP) and if the string literal `` is not empty. The `assert` statement is used to check for conditions that are expected to be true, and if they are not, it will abort the program with an error message. In this case, the assertion is checking that the current function has a frame pointer and that the string literal is not empty. If either of these conditions" LLVM,RISCV,1461,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `if ( hasFP ( MF ) ) {` This is because the code snippet ends with a check for the presence of a frame pointer (FP) in the machine function (MF), and if it is present, the code will enter the `if` block." LLVM,RISCV,1462,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet without knowing the specific values of the variables and the implementation of the functions being called. However, based on the code snippet, it appears that the next statement will be the start of a loop, possibly a for loop, as the code is setting up a loop variable `CS` and initializing it to the last element of the `NonLibcallCSI` vector. The loop will likely iterate over the elements of the `NonLibcallCSI` vector in reverse order." LLVM,RISCV,1463,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `report_fatal_error()` This is because the `if` statement checks if the value of `Val` is not an integer, and if it is not, it will execute the `report_fatal_error` function with the string literal `` as an argument." LLVM,RISCV,1464,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be: `SavedRegs.set();`. This is because the code is currently setting the `SavedRegs` bit vector with two `` values, and the next statement is likely to be another call to `SavedRegs.set()` with another `` value." LLVM,RISCV,1465,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `SavedRegs.set(MF.getFrameInfo().getCalleeSavedRegs());` This statement sets the `SavedRegs` bit vector to the callee-saved registers of the machine function `MF`. The `getCalleeSavedRegs()` method of the `FrameInfo` class is used to retrieve the callee-saved registers, and the `set()` method of the `BitVector` class is used to set the `SavedRegs` bit vector to the callee-saved" LLVM,RISCV,1466,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `getRegisterInfo` and `getStackSize` methods, as well as the values of the `STI` and `MFI` objects. However, based on the names of the methods and the types of the variables, it is likely that the next statement will be related to the retrieval of information about the stack frame, such as the size of the stack frame or the location of the stack frame in memory. Without more context or information about the specific implementation of" LLVM,RISCV,1467,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `uint64_t StackAlign = RI->needsStackRealignment(MF) ? MFI.getMaxAlignment() : getStackAlignment();` This line of code is calculating the stack alignment for the current machine frame. It is using the `needsStackRealignment` method of the `RegisterInfo` class to determine if the stack needs to be realigned, and if so, it is using the `getMaxAlignment` method of the `MachineFrameInfo` class to get the maximum alignment for the stack. If" LLVM,RISCV,1468,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be: `LastFrameDestroy->eraseFromParent();` This is because the previous line of code, `std::advance(LastFrameDestroy, -MFI.getCalleeSavedInfo().size());`, advances the iterator `LastFrameDestroy` to the instruction that destroys the last frame. The next logical step would be to erase that instruction from the parent block." LLVM,RISCV,1469,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be: `adjustReg(MBB, MBBI, DL, SPReg, SPReg, -StackSize, MachineInstr::FrameSetup);` This is because the previous statement, `if (StackSize == && !MFI.adjustsStack()) return;`, checks if the stack size is equal to a specific value () and if the function does not adjust the stack. If this condition is true, the function returns. Otherwise, the next statement is executed, which is" LLVM,RISCV,1470,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `FrameReg = ;` Explanation: The code snippet is part of a function that is processing a stack frame. It is checking if the current frame index (`FI`) is within the range of the minimum and maximum frame indices (`MinCSFI` and `MaxCSFI`, respectively) in the current stack frame. If the current frame index is within this range, the function sets the `FrameReg` variable to a string literal. The string literal is not specified in the code snippet, so we cannot determine its exact" LLVM,RISCV,1471,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty because it depends on the specific values of the variables and the behavior of the functions being called. However, based on the context and the code structure, it appears that the next statement will be: `Offset += StackOffset::get(alignTo(MFI->getStackSize() - RVFI->getCalleeSavedStackSize(), ), RVFI->getRVVStackSize());` This statement is part of an `else` block that is executed when the `Target" LLVM,RISCV,1472,"It's difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet without knowing the specific values of the variables and the behavior of the functions being called. However, based on the code snippet, it appears that the next statement will be the `if ( hasFP ( MF ) )` statement. The code snippet is setting up the frame for a function call, and it is checking if the function has a frame pointer (FP) and if it does, it is adjusting the frame pointer to point to the correct location in the stack. The `if ( hasFP ( MF ) )` statement checks if the" LLVM,RISCV,1473,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `adjustReg(MBB, MBBI, DL, FPReg, SPReg, StackSize - RVFI->getVarArgsSaveSize(), MachineInstr::FrameSetup);` This statement adjusts the frame pointer (FPReg) to point to the start of the variable argument list, which is located at the end of the stack frame. The `adjustReg` function is called with the `MachineInstr::FrameSetup` argument, which indicates that the frame pointer should be adjusted to point to the start of the variable argument" LLVM,RISCV,1474,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `for (const auto &Entry : CSI) {` This line of code is a `for` loop that iterates over the `CalleeSavedInfo` objects in the `CSI` vector. The loop variable `Entry` is a reference to each `CalleeSavedInfo` object in the vector, and the loop body will be executed for each object in the vector." LLVM,RISCV,1475,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return MBB.erase(I);` Explanation: The code snippet is part of a function that is adjusting the stack pointer and then erasing an instruction from a basic block. The function takes a `MachineFunction` object and a `MachineInstr` object as input, and it uses the `getSubtarget` method to get the subtarget information for the machine function. It then checks if the instruction has a reserved call frame, and if not, it adjusts the stack pointer and erases the instruction from the basic block" LLVM,RISCV,1476,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be the continuation of the loop over the `CSI` vector, which is a `std::vector` of `CalleeSavedInfo` objects. The loop body is not shown in the code snippet, but it is likely to be processing the `Entry` object in some way, such as updating the frame pointer or creating a new machine instruction. Here is a possible continuation of the code snippet: ``` for (const auto &Entry : CSI) { // Process the Entry object in some way // ... }" LLVM,RISCV,1477,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `unsigned CFIIndex = MF.addFrameInst(MCCFIInstruction::createDefCfa(nullptr, RI->getDwarfRegNum(SPReg, true), -FPOffset));` This line of code adds a new frame instruction to the machine function `MF` using the `addFrameInst` method. The instruction is a `DefCfa` instruction, which defines the Call Frame Address (CFA) for the current stack frame. The `createDefCfa` method is used to create the `" LLVM,RISCV,1478,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `BuildMI(MBB, MBBI, DL, TII->get(TargetOpcode::CFI_INSTRUCTION)) .addCFIIndex(CFIIndex);` This statement is part of the `if (hasFP(MF))` block, which is executed if the function has a frame pointer. The statement creates a new machine instruction using the `BuildMI` function, which takes several arguments: * `MBB`: The machine basic block to which the instruction should be added. * `MBBI`: The" LLVM,RISCV,1479,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `BuildMI(MBB, MBBI, DL, TII->get(TargetOpcode::CFI_INSTRUCTION), SPReg).addCFIIndex(CFIIndex);` This statement is building a machine instruction using the `BuildMI` function, which takes several parameters: * `MBB`: The machine basic block in which the instruction is being built. * `MBBI`: The machine basic block instruction that is being built. * `DL`: The data layout of the target architecture. * `T" LLVM,RISCV,1480,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `FrameReg = RI->getFrameRegister(MF);`" LLVM,RISCV,1481,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `unsigned CFIIndex = MF.addFrameInst(MCCFIInstruction::createDefCfaOffset(nullptr, -StackSize));` This statement adds a new frame instruction to the machine function `MF` using the `addFrameInst` method. The instruction is a `def_cfa_offset` instruction, which sets the offset of the Canonical Frame Address (CFA) register from the stack pointer. The offset is specified as `-StackSize`, which is the size of the stack frame in bytes. The `" LLVM,RISCV,1482,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `MRI->getDwarfFrameInfo(MF, MBB, MBBI, DL, CSI, StackSize, RVFI->getVarArgsSaveSize());`" LLVM,RISCV,1483,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be the `adjustReg` function call, which is used to adjust the register values in the machine code. The `adjustReg` function takes several arguments, including the machine basic block, the last non-debug instruction, the debug location, the stack pointer register, the frame pointer register, the stack size, and the frame destroy flag. The `adjustReg` function is used to adjust the register values in the machine code to account for the stack realignment or the presence of variable-sized objects on the stack. The function checks if the machine" LLVM,RISCV,1484,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `MachineBasicBlock` class and the `getFPReg` and `getSPReg` methods. However, based on the names of the methods and variables, it appears that the code is working with a machine code generator and is generating instructions for a specific architecture. The `MachineBasicBlock` class appears to be a container for a sequence of machine code instructions, and the `iterator` type is used to iterate over the instructions in the block. The `getFPReg` and `get" LLVM,RISCV,1485,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be: `Subtarget.getStdExtV()` This is because the `Subtarget` object is being used to call the `getStdExtV()` method, which is likely to return a value that is then used in the rest of the code." LLVM,RISCV,1486,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `shouldEnableVectorUnit` method and the input parameters. However, based on the name of the method and the fact that it is declared as a `const` method, it is likely that the method will not modify the state of the `MachineFunction` object and will return a boolean value indicating whether the vector unit should be enabled." LLVM,RISCV,1487,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return MFI.hasBP();`" LLVM,RISCV,1488,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the code depends on the specific implementation of the `MachineFrameInfo` and `TargetRegisterInfo` classes, as well as the values of the variables `MF` and `STI`. However, based on the names of the variables and the methods being called, it is likely that the next statement of the code will be a call to a method on the `TargetRegisterInfo` object, such as `getRegisterInfo()` or `getRegisterName()`. The purpose of this method is likely to retrieve information about" LLVM,RISCV,1489,"Based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the next statement will be: `RI->needsStackRealignment(MF);` This is because the code snippet ends with a call to `RI->needsStackRealignment(MF)`, which is the next statement that will be executed." LLVM,RISCV,1490,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `adjustReg(MBB, MBBI, DL, SPReg, SPReg, -StackSize, MachineInstr::FrameSetup);` This statement adjusts the stack pointer register (SPReg) by subtracting the stack size (StackSize) from it, which is the amount of space needed for the function's stack frame. The `adjustReg` function is called with the `MachineInstr::FrameSetup` argument, which indicates that the adjustment is being made as part of the function's prologue." LLVM,RISCV,1491,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific values of the variables and the behavior of the functions called. However, based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the next statement will be the start of a loop that iterates over the elements of the `CSRegs` array. The loop will check if the current element of the `CSRegs` array is a callee-saved register, and if so, it will set the corresponding bit in the `SavedRegs` bitset. If the current element is not a callee" LLVM,RISCV,1492,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `SavedRegs.set();`." LLVM,RISCV,1493,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `FrameSize += (MaxStackAlign.value() - StackAlign.value());` This statement is adding the difference between the maximum stack alignment and the current stack alignment to the frame size. The purpose of this statement is to ensure that the frame size is a multiple of the maximum stack alignment, which is required for correct stack alignment on some architectures." LLVM,RISCV,1494,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return MBB.erase(MI);` This statement is the last statement in the `eliminateCallFramePseudoInstr` function, and it returns the result of the `erase` method called on the `MBB` object, passing in the `MI` iterator as an argument. The `erase` method is used to remove the instruction pointed to by the `MI` iterator from the `MBB` object." LLVM,RISCV,1495,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be: `uint64_t FirstSPAdjustAmount = getFirstSPAdjustAmount(MF);` This is because the previous statement in the code snippet is `if (RVFI->getLibCallStackSize() > 0) {`, and the `getFirstSPAdjustAmount` function is called on the `MF` object, which is a member of the `RVFI` object. The `getFirstSPAdjustAmount` function is likely to return a value of type `uint64_t`," LLVM,RISCV,1496,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `if ( RI->needsStackRealignment(MF) || MFI.hasVarSizedObjects() ) {` This is because the code snippet ends with a `while` loop that iterates over the instructions in the basic block, and the next instruction after the loop is an `if` statement that checks if the function needs stack realignment or has variable-sized objects." LLVM,RISCV,1497,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `if ( hasFP ( MF ) ) {`" LLVM,RISCV,1498,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific values of the variables and the behavior of the functions being called. However, based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the next statement will be: `Register SCSPReg = ( ) ;` This line of code is assigning a value to the `SCSPReg` register, which is likely a register on the target machine. The value being assigned is the result of calling the `` function with no arguments. It is not clear what this" LLVM,RISCV,1499,"The next statement of the code snippet is: `Register SCSPReg = ( ) ;` This line declares a new register variable `SCSPReg` and initializes it with the value of the string literal ``. The value of `` is not specified in the code snippet, so it is not possible to determine the exact value of `SCSPReg`." LLVM,RISCV,1500,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific values of the variables and the behavior of the functions being called. However, based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the next statement will be a call to the `BuildMI` function, which is used to build a machine instruction. The `BuildMI` function takes several arguments, including a pointer to a `MachineBasicBlock` object, a pointer to a `MachineInstr` object, a pointer to a `DataLayout` object, and a string representing the name of the instruction to be built." LLVM,RISCV,1501,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return - getStackAlign().value();`. This is because the `if` statement checks if the `StackSize` is not an integer and if the `CSI.size()` is greater than ``. If this condition is true, then the `return` statement will be executed, which returns ` - getStackAlign().value()`. If the `if` statement is false, then the `return` statement will not be executed, and the next statement will" LLVM,RISCV,1502,"Based on the code snippet you provided, it appears to be a part of a function that is calculating the offset of a stack frame. The code is checking if the current frame index (FI) is within a certain range (MinCSFI to MaxCSFI) and if it is, it sets the FrameReg variable to a specific value and adjusts the Offset variable accordingly. If the FI is not within the range, it checks if the function needs stack realignment and if the frame index is less than a certain value. If both conditions are true, it sets the FrameReg variable to a different value and adjusts the" LLVM,RISCV,1503,"Based on the code snippet you provided, it appears to be a part of a function that is trying to determine the maximum register number used in a function. The function takes a `MachineFunctionInfo` object and a `CallingConv` object as input, and returns an integer representing the maximum register number used in the function. The code snippet you provided is incomplete, so it's difficult to say exactly what the next statement will be. However, based on the context, it's likely that the next statement will be a `return` statement that returns the maximum register number used in the function." LLVM,RISCV,1504,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be: `NonLibcallCSI.reserve(CSI.size());` This is because the `SmallVector` class has a `reserve` method that can be used to pre-allocate memory for the vector, and the `CSI.size()` expression is likely to be the number of elements in the `CSI` vector." LLVM,RISCV,1505,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return NonLibcallCSI;`" LLVM,RISCV,1506,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet without knowing the context and the specific implementation of the `getRegisterInfo()` method. However, based on the name of the method and the type of the variable `TRI`, it is likely that the next statement will be an assignment of a value to `TRI` based on the result of the `getRegisterInfo()` method. For example, the next statement could be: ``` TRI = STI.getRegisterInfo(); ``` This would assign the result of the `getRegisterInfo()` method to the `TRI` variable" LLVM,RISCV,1507,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return MFI.hasBP();`" LLVM,RISCV,1508,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return RegInfo->hasFP(MFI.getFP());`" LLVM,RISCV,1509,"The next statement after the code snippet you provided is: `return MF.getTarget().Options.DisableFramePointerElim(MF) || RegInfo->needsStackRealignment(MF) || MFI.hasVarSizedObjects() || MFI.isFrameAddressTaken();` This statement is a return statement that returns a boolean value based on the evaluation of several conditions. The conditions are: * `MF.getTarget().Options.DisableFramePointerElim(MF)`: This condition checks if the frame pointer elimination option is disabled" LLVM,RISCV,1510,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the code depends on the specific implementation of the `MachineFunction` class and the `hasReservedCallFrame` method. However, based on the name of the method and the context in which it is being called, it is likely that the next statement will check if the `MachineFunction` has a reserved call frame, and return a boolean value indicating whether or not it does. Here is a possible next statement: ``` return MF.hasReservedCallFrame(); ``` This statement" LLVM,RISCV,1511,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet without knowing the context and the implementation of the `MFI` and `RegInfo` classes. However, based on the names of the methods being called, it appears that the code is creating a stack object using the `CreateStackObject` method of `MFI`, and passing it the spill size and alignment information from the `RegInfo` class. The `CreateStackObject` method is likely to return a pointer to the newly created stack object, which is then assigned to the `RegScavFI` variable. Without more information" LLVM,RISCV,1512,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty because it depends on the specific values of the variables and the implementation of the `isInt` function. However, based on the code snippet, it appears that the next statement will be a call to the `estimateStackSize` method of the `MF` object, which is an instance of the `TargetRegisterClass` class. The `estimateStackSize` method is likely to return a value that is then passed to the `isInt` function, which checks whether the value is an integer. If the value is not an integer" LLVM,RISCV,1513,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet without knowing the context and the purpose of the code. However, based on the code snippet provided, it appears to be related to the optimization of a compiler. The code is using a number of variables and functions that are not defined in the snippet, so it is not possible to provide a definitive answer. However, based on the names of the variables and functions, it appears that the code is trying to load register values from stack slots, and it is using a number of helper functions to do so. The `TII` variable appears to" LLVM,RISCV,1514,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `TargetFrameLowering(StackGrowsDown, , )` This is a constructor call for the `TargetFrameLowering` class, which is a base class for the `FrameLowering` class. The constructor takes three arguments: `StackGrowsDown`, which is a boolean value indicating whether the stack grows down or up; ``, which is a numerical literal representing the size of the stack frame; and ``, which is another numerical literal representing the" LLVM,RISCV,1515,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `TargetFrameLowering(StackGrowsDown, , )` This is a constructor call for the `TargetFrameLowering` class, which is a base class for the `FrameLowering` class. The constructor takes three arguments: `StackGrowsDown`, which is a boolean value indicating whether the stack grows down or up; ``, which is a numerical literal representing the size of the stack frame; and ``, which is another numerical literal representing the" LLVM,RISCV,1516,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `BuildMI(MBB, MI, DL, TII.get(), ).addExternalSymbol(SpillLibCall, ).setMIFlag(MachineInstr::FrameSetup);` This statement is calling the `BuildMI` function with the `MBB`, `MI`, `DL`, and `TII.get()` arguments, and then chaining the `addExternalSymbol` and `setMIFlag" LLVM,RISCV,1517,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be: `for (auto &CS : NonLibcallCSI) {` This is because the code snippet ends with the declaration of the `NonLibcallCSI` variable, and the next statement is likely to be a loop that iterates over the elements of this variable." LLVM,RISCV,1518,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be: `Value * Stride;` This is because the code is currently iterating over the operands of a `GEP` instruction, and the next operand to be processed is a `Value` pointer called `Stride`. The code is checking whether the current operand is a vector type, and if it is, it is assigning it to a variable called `VecOperand`. If the current operand is not a vector type, the code continues to the next iteration of the loop." LLVM,RISCV,1519,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `Builder.SetInsertPoint(GEP->getSourceElementType());` This statement sets the insertion point of the IR builder to the source element type of the GEP instruction. The insertion point is the point in the code where new instructions will be inserted." LLVM,RISCV,1520,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be the definition of the `tryCreateStridedLoadStore` function, which is called for each gather and scatter instruction in the loop. The function takes four arguments: the instruction, the type of the instruction, the first operand of the instruction, and the second operand of the instruction. The function returns a boolean value indicating whether the instruction was successfully converted to a strided load or store." LLVM,RISCV,1521,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be a `case` statement, as the code is checking the opcode of the instruction `BO` and determining which case to execute based on that opcode. The possible cases are: * `Instruction::Or`: This case is already handled in the code snippet, and it returns `false` if the operands of the `Or` instruction do not have any common bits set. * `Instruction::And`: This case is not handled in the code snippet, but it is likely to be handled in a similar way to the `Instruction::" LLVM,RISCV,1522,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `for (auto *II : Gathers) Changed |= tryCreateStridedLoadStore(II, II->getType(), II->getArgOperand(), II->getArgOperand());` This line of code iterates over the `Gathers` vector, which contains all the `IntrinsicInst`s that have a `getIntrinsicID()` of `` and have a type of `FixedVectorType`. For each `Intr" LLVM,RISCV,1523,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be the start of the next iteration of the outer loop, which is the loop over the basic blocks in the function `F`. Specifically, the next statement is likely to be the line `for ( BasicBlock & BB : F ) {`." LLVM,RISCV,1524,"The next statement of this code snippet is: return new GatherScatterLoweringPass();" LLVM,RISCV,1525,"The next statement in the code snippet is: `AU.addRequired();` This statement adds the `TargetPassConfig` pass as a required pass for the current pass." LLVM,RISCV,1526,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be a call to the `addRequired` method of the `AU` object, passing in an instance of the `TargetPassConfig` class as an argument. The purpose of this statement is to add the `TargetPassConfig` object to the list of required configuration objects for the `AU` object." LLVM,RISCV,1527,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be a return statement, as the `getPassName()` function is expected to return a string value. The `` placeholder is a hint that the function should return a string literal, but the actual value returned will depend on the specific implementation of the function." LLVM,RISCV,1528,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `TLI` and `DataType` classes, as well as the input data. However, based on the code snippet provided, it is likely that the next statement will be a call to the `TLI` class's `isLegalElementTypeForRVV` method, which checks if the given scalar type is a legal element type for the RVV (Register Vector Vision) instruction set. If the scalar type is not legal, the method will return `false`, and" LLVM,RISCV,1529,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `Value * Stride = ConstantInt::get(StartVal->getType(), StrideVal);` This statement creates a new `Value` object called `Stride` and initializes it with the value of `StrideVal`, which is an `APInt` object representing the stride of the vector. The `ConstantInt::get()` function is used to create a new `ConstantInt` object with the specified type and value." LLVM,RISCV,1530,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `if (Step->getType()->isIntegerTy() && Step->getType()->getIntegerBitWidth() == 32) {`" LLVM,RISCV,1531,"The next statement of the code snippet is: `Value * Splat = getSplatValue(BO->getOperand(OtherIndex));` This line of code is assigning the result of the `getSplatValue` function, which takes the operand of the binary operator `BO` at index `OtherIndex`, to the variable `Splat`. The `getSplatValue` function is not defined in the code snippet provided, so it is not possible to determine what it does or what value it returns. However, based on the name of the function, it is" LLVM,RISCV,1532,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be the implementation of the `GatherScatterLowering` function, which is a member function of the `FunctionPass` class. The function is likely to perform some kind of optimization or transformation on the LLVM IR code, based on the `ID` parameter that is passed to it. Without more context, it is not possible to provide a more specific prediction of what the next statement of this code snippet will be." LLVM,RISCV,1533,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be the implementation of the `GatherScatterLowering` function, which is a member function of the `FunctionPass` class. The function is likely to perform some kind of optimization or transformation on the LLVM IR code, based on the `ID` parameter that is passed to it. Without more context, it is not possible to provide a more specific prediction of what the next statement of this code snippet will be." LLVM,RISCV,1534,The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be a loop that iterates over the `Gathers` vector and performs some operation on each element. The loop will likely use the `IntrinsicInst` class to access the elements of the vector and perform the necessary operations. LLVM,RISCV,1535,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `bool GatherScatterLowering :: runOnFunction ( Function & F ) { if ( skipFunction ( F ) ) return false ; auto & TPC = getAnalysis < TargetPassConfig > ( ) ; auto & TM = TPC . getTM < TargetMachine > ( ) ; ST = & TM . getSubtarget < Subtarget > ( F ) ; if ( ! ST -> hasVInstructions ( ) || ! ST ->" LLVM,RISCV,1536,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `Call -> takeName ( II ) ;` This line of code sets the name of the `Call` instruction to the name of the `II` instruction. The `takeName` method is used to transfer the name of one instruction to another, so that the `Call` instruction will have the same name as the `II` instruction." LLVM,RISCV,1537,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be: `Call->setOnlyReadsMemory(true);` This is because the code is creating a call instruction using the `CreateIntrinsic` method of the `IRBuilder` class, and the `setOnlyReadsMemory` method is used to set the `onlyReadsMemory` property of the call instruction to `true`. This property indicates that the call instruction only reads from memory and does not write to it. It's worth noting that the code snippet is using the `assert` statement to check that the `St" LLVM,RISCV,1538,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `if (InstrInfo.hasAVLReg() && InstrInfo.AVLReg == ) {` This is the first `if` statement in the code snippet, and it checks whether the `InstrInfo` object has an AVL register and whether the AVL register is equal to ``. If both conditions are true, the code inside the `if` block will be executed." LLVM,RISCV,1539,"The next statement after the code snippet you provided is: `assert ( isValid ( ) && ) ;` This statement is an assertion that checks if the `isValid()` method returns `true` and if the string literal `` is not empty. If either of these conditions is not met, the assertion will fail and an error will be thrown." LLVM,RISCV,1540,"It is difficult to determine the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `MachineInstr` class and the values of the variables `CurInfo`, `Require`, and `MRI`. However, based on the code provided, it appears that the next statement will be: `DefMI->getVRegDef(Require->getAVLReg());` This statement is likely to be a method call on the `DefMI` object, which is an instance of the `MachineInstr` class. The method being called is `getV" LLVM,RISCV,1541,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet without knowing the context and the values of the variables and constants used in the code. However, based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the next statement will be related to the processing of the operands of the machine instruction. The code snippet defines a variable `InstrInfo` of type `VSETVLIInfo`, which is likely a structure or class that contains information about the instruction being processed. The code also defines several other variables, including `NumOperands`, `HasPolicy`, `ForceTailAgnostic`, `T" LLVM,RISCV,1542,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be the initialization of the `InstrInfo` object with the appropriate values for the `AVLReg`, `VTYPE`, and `AVLImm` fields. The code snippet is part of a function that appears to be responsible for generating instructions for a vector processing unit. The `InstrInfo` object is likely to be a structure or class that contains information about the instruction being generated, such as the operands, the result, and any other relevant information. The code snippet initializes the `InstrInfo` object with the appropriate values for" LLVM,RISCV,1543,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet without knowing the specific context and the implementation of the functions and variables used in the code. However, based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the code is related to the implementation of a virtual machine or a processor, and it is likely that the next statement will be related to the execution of the machine instructions (MI) in the current basic block (MBB). The code snippet appears to be part of a function that is responsible for inserting virtual set-vector-type instructions (VSETVLI) into the machine code. The function takes a machine" LLVM,RISCV,1544,"The next statement of the code snippet is: `CurInfo = ( ) ;` This statement assigns an empty string to the `CurInfo` variable, which is a `VSETVLIInfo` object. The `VSETVLIInfo` class is used to store information about the `vsetvli` instruction, which is used to set the vector length and stride for vector instructions. The `CurInfo` variable is used to store the current `VSETVLIInfo` object, and the `PrevVSETVLIMI` variable is" LLVM,RISCV,1545,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return false;`" LLVM,RISCV,1546,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific inputs and the behavior of the `Require` and `getAVLReg` functions. However, based on the code snippet, it appears that the next statement will be: `if (InReg.isVirtual()) return true;` This is because the code checks whether the `AVLReg` is virtual, and if it is not, it returns `true`. If `AVLReg` is virtual, then the code retrieves the `MachineInstr` associated with it using `get" LLVM,RISCV,1547,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `if (DefInfo.hasSameAVL(PBBInfo.Exit) || !DefInfo.hasSameVTYPE(PBBInfo.Exit)) return true;` This statement checks if the `DefInfo` object, which contains information about the definition of the virtual register, has the same address vector length (AVL) and virtual type (VTYPE) as the exit block of the predecessor basic block (PBB). If either of these conditions is not met, the function returns `true`." LLVM,RISCV,1548,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific values of the variables and the behavior of the functions called. However, based on the context and the structure of the code, it appears that the next statement will be: `InstrInfo.setAVLReg(VLOp.getReg());` This is because the previous statement is checking if the operand is an immediate value, and if it is, it sets the AVL register or immediate value accordingly. If the operand is not an immediate value, then it is likely that the" LLVM,RISCV,1549,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `if (MI.isCall() || MI.isInlineAsm() || MI.modifiesRegister() || MI.modifiesRegister()) { BBInfo.Change = (); }` This statement checks if the current instruction is a call, inline assembly, or modifies a specific register (represented by ``). If any of these conditions are true, the `BBInfo.Change` variable is set to `;` This statement is executed if the `hasAVLReg()` function returns `true`, which means that the `getAVLReg()` function is called to retrieve the value of the AVL register. The value returned by `getAVLReg()` is then compared to the string literal ``. If the values are equal, the function returns `true`, otherwise it returns `false`." LLVM,RISCV,1554,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the `hasSamePolicy` function depends on the implementation of the `VSETVLIInfo` class and the specific values of the `Other` object. However, based on the name of the function and the fact that it takes a `const` reference to a `VSETVLIInfo` object as an argument, it is likely that the function will compare the policy of the current object with the policy of the `Other` object and return a boolean value indicating whether the policies are the same." LLVM,RISCV,1555,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return (this->getSEW() == Other.getSEW());` This is because the `hasSameSEW` function is checking if the `SEW` (Same Element Width) of the current object and the `Other` object are the same. The `getSEW` function is used to retrieve the `SEW` of the object, and the `==` operator is used to compare the two values." LLVM,RISCV,1556,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return getAVLImm() == ;` This statement is executed if the `hasAVLImm()` function returns `true`, which means that the current node has an AVL immutable value. The `getAVLImm()` function is then called to retrieve the AVL immutable value, and the value is compared to ``. If the values are equal, the function returns `true`, otherwise it returns `false`." LLVM,RISCV,1557,"Based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the next statement will be: `return false;` The `if` statement that follows the `assert` statement checks if `InstrInfo.SEWLMULRatioOnly` is true, and if so, returns false. However, since the `assert` statement has already been executed and did not trigger an exception, we know that `InstrInfo.SEWLMULRatioOnly` is false. Therefore, the next statement to be executed will be the `return false;` statement at the end of the `if` block." LLVM,RISCV,1558,"This code snippet is a switch statement that checks the value of a string literal against a set of possible values. The `default` case returns `false`, and the other cases return `true` if the value of the string literal matches the value of the case. Based on the information provided, it is not possible to predict the next statement of the code snippet with certainty. However, based on the structure of the code and the information provided, it is likely that the next statement will be a `case` statement that checks the value of the string literal against another possible value." LLVM,RISCV,1559,"The next statement after the code snippet you provided is: `return MI.getOpcode() == || MI.getOpcode() == || MI.getOpcode() == ;` This statement is a boolean expression that checks if the opcode of the current instruction is equal to ``, ``, or ``. If any of the conditions is true, the function returns `true`, otherwise it returns `false`." LLVM,RISCV,1560,"Based on the code snippet provided, it is difficult to predict the next statement with certainty. However, based on the context and the information provided, it is possible to make an educated guess. The code snippet appears to be part of a function that is checking the compatibility of a vector instruction with the current instruction. The function is checking if the current instruction has a compatible vector type with the required vector type, and if the current instruction has a compatible AVL register with the required AVL register. Based on this information, it is likely that the next statement of the code snippet will be a check to see" LLVM,RISCV,1561,"Based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the next statement of the code will be: `if (PHI->getOperand(PHIOp)->getReg() == AVLReg) {` This is because the code is currently iterating over the operands of the PHI instruction, and the next operand to be processed is the one at index `PHIOp`. The code is checking whether the register associated with the current operand is the same as the `AVLReg` register, and if it is, then it will return `true`." LLVM,RISCV,1562,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific input and the behavior of the `Require` and `MachineInstr` classes. However, based on the code provided, it appears that the next statement will be: `if (InReg.isVirtual()) return true;` This is because the code checks if the `AVLReg` is virtual, and if it is, it returns `true`. If the `AVLReg` is not virtual, it gets the `MachineInstr` associated with it and checks if it is a" LLVM,RISCV,1563,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be: `for (const MachineBasicBlock &MBB : MF) {` This is because the code is currently iterating over the MachineBasicBlocks in the MachineFunction, and the next step is to iterate over the instructions in each MachineBasicBlock. The `for` loop is used to iterate over the MachineBasicBlocks, and the `HaveVectorOp` variable is used to keep track of whether any of the instructions in the MachineBasicBlocks have vector operations." LLVM,RISCV,1564,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `VSETVLIInfo` function and the values of the input parameters. However, based on the names of the parameters and the values provided, it appears that the function is setting up some configuration options for a vector processing unit. The `AVLImm` parameter is set to ``, which suggests that the function is setting the immediate value for the vector length. The `TailAgnostic` parameter is set to `false`, which means that the" LLVM,RISCV,1565,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `VSETVLIInfo` function and the values of the input parameters. However, based on the names of the parameters and the values provided, it appears that the function is setting up some configuration options for a vector processing unit. The `AVLImm` parameter is set to ``, which suggests that the function is setting the immediate value for the vector length. The `TailAgnostic` parameter is set to `false`, which means that the" LLVM,RISCV,1566,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `PrevVSETVLIMI = nullptr;` This statement sets the `PrevVSETVLIMI` variable to `nullptr`, which indicates that there is no previous VSETVLI instruction in the current basic block." LLVM,RISCV,1567,"The next statement after the code snippet you provided is: `return false;` This is because the `if` statement that checks if `hasCompatibleVTYPE` returns `true` is not executed, and the `if` statement that checks if `Strict` is `true` also returns `false`. Therefore, the function returns `false`." LLVM,RISCV,1568,"The next statement after the given code snippet is: `return false;` This is because the code checks the `SEWLMULRatioOnly` flag and returns `false` if it is set. If the flag is not set, the code checks the `Strict` flag and the `InstrInfo` object's `AVLReg` property. If the `AVLReg` property is equal to `` and the `SEW` property is equal to the `SEW` property of the `InstrInfo` object, the code returns `true`. Otherwise" LLVM,RISCV,1569,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `if ( HasPolicy ) {` This is because the `HasPolicy` variable is checked to see if it is true, and if it is, the code inside the `if` statement is executed. If `HasPolicy` is false, the code inside the `if` statement is skipped and the code after the `if` statement is executed." LLVM,RISCV,1570,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific values of the variables and the behavior of the functions called. However, based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the next statement will be: `unsigned Log2SEW = MI.getOperand(NumOperands - ).getImm();` This statement is assigning the value of the immediate operand of the `NumOperands - ` operand to the `Log2SEW` variable. The `getImm()`" LLVM,RISCV,1571,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be: `const MachineOperand &VLOp = MI.getOperand(NumOperands - );` This is because the code is checking the value of the `TSFlags` variable, and if it is set to a certain value, it will retrieve the operand at index `NumOperands - ` from the `MI` object and store it in the `VLOp` variable." LLVM,RISCV,1572,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return hasSameAVL(InstrInfo);`" LLVM,RISCV,1573,"The next statement of the code snippet is: `return false;`" LLVM,RISCV,1574,"The next statement after the given code snippet is: `return true;`" LLVM,RISCV,1575,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `VSETVLIInfo` function and the values of the input parameters. However, based on the name of the function and the parameters passed to it, it appears that the function is setting the information for a vector load/store instruction. The `AVLImm` parameter is set to a value of ``, which suggests that the function is setting the immediate value for the vector load/store instruction. The `TailAgnostic` and `Mask" LLVM,RISCV,1576,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `VSETVLIInfo` function and the values of the input parameters. However, based on the name of the function and the parameters passed to it, it appears that the function is setting the information for a vector load/store instruction. The `AVLImm` parameter is set to a value of ``, which suggests that the function is setting the immediate value for the vector load/store instruction. The `TailAgnostic` and `Mask" LLVM,RISCV,1577,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `InInfo.setUnknown();` This is because the `if` statement checks if the `MBB.pred_empty()` method returns `true`, and if it does, it sets the `InInfo` variable to an unknown value using the `setUnknown()` method. If the `MBB.pred_empty()` method returns `false`, the `for` loop is executed, and the `InInfo` variable is set to the intersection of the `BlockInfo[P->getNumber()].Exit` values for all predecessors of the current" LLVM,RISCV,1578,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `const MachineOperand & VLOp = MI . getOperand ( getVLOpNum ( MI ) ) ;` This line of code retrieves the operand of the machine instruction `MI` that corresponds to the vector length operand. The `getVLOpNum` function is used to determine the operand number of the vector length operand, and the `getOperand` function is used to retrieve the operand at that number. The resulting operand is stored in the variable `VLOp`." LLVM,RISCV,1579,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `const MachineOperand & VLOp = MI . getOperand ( getVLOpNum ( MI ) ) ;` This line of code is retrieving the operand of the machine instruction that corresponds to the vector length operand. The `getVLOpNum` function is used to get the operand number of the vector length operand, and the `getOperand` function is used to retrieve the operand with that number. The resulting operand is stored in the variable `VLOp`." LLVM,RISCV,1580,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `HadVectorOp = true;` Explanation: The code snippet is a part of a function named `computeVLVTYPEChanges` that is used to compute the changes in the vector length and type of a basic block. The function takes a `MachineBasicBlock` object as an argument and returns a `bool` indicating whether the basic block had any vector operations. The function first initializes a `bool` variable named `HadVectorOp` to `false`, which indicates whether the basic block had any vector operations. It" LLVM,RISCV,1581,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific input and the behavior of the `isCall`, `isInlineAsm`, `readsRegister`, `isVectorConfigInstr`, `isVLPreservingConfig`, and other functions that are not shown in the code snippet. However, based on the code snippet and the context in which it is used, it is likely that the next statement will be a continuation of the `if` statement that checks whether the current instruction is a vector configuration instruction. If the current instruction is not a vector" LLVM,RISCV,1582,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `if (PrevMI) {`" LLVM,RISCV,1583,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific inputs and the behavior of the functions called. However, based on the code structure, it appears that the next statement will be: `CurInfo = computeInfoForInstr(MI, TSFlags, MRI);` This is because the code is currently inside a loop that iterates over the instructions in a machine code sequence, and the `CurInfo` variable is being updated with the result of the `computeInfoForInstr` function for each instruction. The loop will continue until all instructions" LLVM,RISCV,1584,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `BlockInfo[UnavailablePred->getNumber()].Exit = AvailableInfo;` This statement assigns the value of `AvailableInfo` to the `Exit` field of the `BlockInfo` object for the block corresponding to `UnavailablePred`." LLVM,RISCV,1585,"Based on the code snippet, it appears to be a part of a function that is checking the predecessors of a machine basic block (MBB) and determining if there is a valid exit from the block. The code is checking the predecessors of the MBB and retrieving the exit information for each predecessor. If any of the predecessors have unknown exit information, the function returns. If all the predecessors have valid exit information, the function checks if the MBB has a fixed result. If it does, the function sets a flag to indicate that it has found a valid result" LLVM,RISCV,1586,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be: `dbgs() << ;` This is because the `dbgs()` function is being called again, and the result of the previous call is being used as the input for the next call. The `` placeholder is likely to be replaced with a string literal, which will be output to the debug stream." LLVM,RISCV,1587,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be: `dbgs() << ;` This is because the `dbgs()` function is being called again, and the result of the previous call is being used as the input for the next call. The `` placeholder is likely to be replaced with a string literal, which will be output to the debug stream." LLVM,RISCV,1588,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it appears to be part of a larger program and the context is not provided. However, based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the next statement will be the start of a new block of code, possibly a new function or method. The code snippet ends with a closing brace `}`, which suggests that the previous block of code has ended and a new block is about to begin. The next statement is likely to be the start of a new block of code, possibly a new function or method, as the closing brace" LLVM,RISCV,1589,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the code depends on the values of the variables and the specific implementation of the `getSEW` function. However, based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the `getSEW` function is returning the value of the `SEW` variable, which is an unsigned integer. Therefore, the next statement of this code snippet would likely be the statement that follows the `return` statement, which is not provided in the code snippet." LLVM,RISCV,1590,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the code depends on the values of the variables and the specific implementation of the `getSEW` function. However, based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the `getSEW` function is returning the value of the `SEW` variable, which is an unsigned integer. Therefore, the next statement of this code snippet would likely be the statement that follows the `return` statement, which is not provided in the code snippet." LLVM,RISCV,1591,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `getVLMUL` function and the context in which it is called. However, based on the name of the function and the fact that it is a `const` method, it is likely that the function returns the value of the `VLMul` member variable." LLVM,RISCV,1592,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `VLMul` function and the input data. However, based on the name of the function, it is likely that the next statement will be a multiplication operation using the `VLMul` function." LLVM,RISCV,1593,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return ( MI . getDesc ( ) ) ;` This statement is returning the value of the `getDesc()` method of the `MachineInstr` object, which is a string literal. The `getVLOpNum()` function is returning this string literal as an unsigned integer." LLVM,RISCV,1594,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the `hasSameVTYPE` function and the value of the `Require` variable are not specified. However, based on the syntax and the fact that the function is called with a single argument, it is likely that the `hasSameVTYPE` function returns a boolean value indicating whether the variable `Require` has the same value type as the argument passed to the function. Therefore, the next statement of this code snippet is likely to be the `return true` statement, which will return" LLVM,RISCV,1595,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return false;` The `if` statement checks if the `hasSameVTYPE` function returns `true`, and if it does, the function returns `true`. If the `if` statement is not satisfied, the function returns `false`." LLVM,RISCV,1596,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return ST.hasAVLImm();`" LLVM,RISCV,1597,"The next statement of the code snippet is: `BuildMI(MBB, InsertPt, DL, TII->get()).addReg(, RegState::Define | RegState::Dead).addReg(, RegState::Kill).addImm(Info.encodeVTYPE()).addReg(, RegState::Implicit);`" LLVM,RISCV,1598,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific inputs and the implementation of the `Require` class. However, based on the code provided, it appears that the next statement will be: `if (Require.StoreOp && VLMul == Require.VLMul && SEW == Require.SEW) return true;` This statement checks if the `StoreOp` flag is set and if the `VLMul` and `SEW` values are the same as those in the `Require` object. If" LLVM,RISCV,1599,"The next statement after the `if` block in the code snippet you provided is: ``` return false; ``` This statement will be executed if the `hasSameAVL` function returns `false`." LLVM,RISCV,1600,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the program depends on the specific values of the variables and the implementation of the `getOperand` and `getReg` methods. However, based on the code snippet provided, it is likely that the next statement will be a comparison between the value of the `STR_LIT` variable and the value of the `MI` variable's `getOperand` method, with the `getReg` method being called on the result of the `getOperand` method. For example, the" LLVM,RISCV,1601,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `if (MI.getOpcode() == ) return true;`" LLVM,RISCV,1602,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return !canSkipVSETVLIForLoadStore(MI, Require, CurInfo);` This statement is executed if the `needVSETVLI` function returns `true` for the given `Require` and `CurInfo` parameters. The `canSkipVSETVLIForLoadStore` function is called with the `MI` instruction, `Require`, and `CurInfo` parameters, and the result is negated (using the `!` operator) to determine whether the `VSETVLI` instruction is" LLVM,RISCV,1603,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return false;` The code snippet is checking various conditions related to the `BlockInfo` and `MachineInstr` objects, and if any of the conditions are not met, it returns `true`. However, if all the conditions are met, it returns `false`." LLVM,RISCV,1604,"The next statement after the `if` blocks is: `OS << << ( unsigned ) AVLReg;` This statement is executed if the `hasAVLReg()` function returns `true`, which means that the `AVLReg` register is available. The statement writes the value of `AVLReg` to the output stream `OS` as an unsigned integer, followed by the string literal ``." LLVM,RISCV,1605,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `BlockInfo.clear();`" LLVM,RISCV,1606,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific inputs and the behavior of the functions called. However, based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the next statement will be: `InstrInfo.setVTYPE(VLMul, SEW, TailAgnostic, false);` This is because the previous statement, `InstrInfo.setAVLReg();`, sets the AVL register to a specific value, and the next statement, `InstrInfo.setVTYPE(" LLVM,RISCV,1607,"Based on the code snippet provided, it is difficult to predict the next statement with certainty. However, based on the context and the information provided, it is likely that the next statement will be related to the handling of the `MI` object, which appears to be an instance of a class that represents a machine instruction. The code snippet checks whether the `BBInfo.Change` object is valid, and if it is not, it assigns a new value to `BBInfo.Change`. If `BBInfo.Change` is valid, the code checks whether the `needVSETVLI` function returns true" LLVM,RISCV,1608,"Based on the code snippet provided, it is difficult to predict the next statement with certainty. However, based on the context and the information provided, it is likely that the next statement will be: `BBInfo.Change = getInfoForVSETVLI(MI);` This is because the code is currently iterating over the instructions in the basic block, and the previous instruction has been determined to be a vector instruction. The `getInfoForVSETVLI` function is called to get the information for the vector instruction, and the result is stored in the `BBInfo.Change` variable." LLVM,RISCV,1609,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific values of the variables and the behavior of the functions being called. However, based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the next statement will be: `CurInfo = ( ) ;` This is because the code checks if the current instruction is a call, inline assembly, or modifies a specific register, and if so, sets `CurInfo` to a string literal. If the current instruction does not meet these conditions, then the next statement will be the `" LLVM,RISCV,1610,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `encodeVTYPE` function and the values of the input parameters. However, based on the name of the function and the parameters, it is likely that the next statement will be a call to the `encodeVTYPE` function with the specified input parameters. Here is a possible next statement: ``` return encodeVTYPE(VLMul, SEW, TailAgnostic, MaskAgnostic); ``` This statement will call the `encodeVTYPE" LLVM,RISCV,1611,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `encodeVTYPE` function and the values of the input parameters. However, based on the name of the function and the parameters, it is likely that the next statement will be a call to the `encodeVTYPE` function with the specified input parameters. Here is a possible next statement: ``` return encodeVTYPE(VLMul, SEW, TailAgnostic, MaskAgnostic); ``` This statement will call the `encodeVTYPE" LLVM,RISCV,1612,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet without knowing the context and the definition of the functions and variables used in the code. However, based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the code is setting values for an object called `NewInfo` based on the values of other objects and variables. The code first checks if the `AVLReg` variable is not null, and if it is not, it sets the `AVLReg` field of `NewInfo` to the value of `AVLReg`. If `AVLReg` is null, the code checks if the `MI" LLVM,RISCV,1613,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return (getVTYPE() == Other.getVTYPE());`" LLVM,RISCV,1614,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it appears to be a part of a larger program and the context is not provided. However, based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the next statement could be: `DestReg = MRI -> createVirtualRegister ( & ) ;` This statement is creating a new virtual register using the `createVirtualRegister` method of the `MRI` object, and assigning it to the `DestReg` variable. The `& ` syntax is used to pass a pointer" LLVM,RISCV,1615,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return *this;`" LLVM,RISCV,1616,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return ( ) ;` Explanation: The code snippet is a method that returns a string literal. The method first checks if the object is valid using the `isValid()` method. If the object is not valid, it returns the `Other` object. If the object is valid and the current object is equal to the `Other` object, it returns the current object. If the object is valid and not equal to the `Other` object, it returns the string literal. Therefore, the next" LLVM,RISCV,1617,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return getAVLImm() == Other.getAVLImm();`" LLVM,RISCV,1618,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return false;` Explanation: The code snippet is checking if the current instruction is a `VSETVLI` instruction, and if it is, it checks if the `AVLReg` and `VTYPE` fields of the instruction match the corresponding fields of the current instruction. If they do, the function returns `false`. If they don't, the function continues to the next statement. So, the next statement of this code snippet is `return false;`, which means that the function will return `false` if the" LLVM,RISCV,1619,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the `setVTYPE` function depends on the specific implementation of the `isValid` and `isUnknown` functions, as well as the value of the `L` parameter. However, based on the name of the function and the parameters it takes, it is likely that the function is setting the value of a variable or property based on the input parameters. The `assert` statement is used to check that the function is being called with valid input parameters, and the `` parameter is likely" LLVM,RISCV,1620,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the `VSETVLIInfo` function is not specified. However, based on the name of the function and the fact that it takes an `AVLImm` parameter, it is likely that the function is used to set the value of a variable or memory location to the value stored in the `AVLImm` parameter. Therefore, the next statement of this code snippet is likely to be a statement that uses the value stored in the `AVLImm` parameter, such as assigning it" LLVM,RISCV,1621,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the `VSETVLIInfo` function is not specified. However, based on the name of the function and the fact that it takes an `AVLImm` parameter, it is likely that the function is used to set the value of a variable or memory location to the value stored in the `AVLImm` parameter. Therefore, the next statement of this code snippet is likely to be a statement that uses the value stored in the `AVLImm` parameter, such as assigning it" LLVM,RISCV,1622,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `HadVectorOp = true;`" LLVM,RISCV,1623,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `BuildMI(MBB, MI, DL, TII->get(""""))`" LLVM,RISCV,1624,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `BuildMI(MBB, MI, DL, TII->get()).addReg(, RegState::Define | RegState::Dead).addReg(, RegState::Kill).addImm(Info.encodeVTYPE()).addReg(, RegState::Implicit);`" LLVM,RISCV,1625,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `VSETVLIInfo DefInfo = getInfoForVSETVLI( *DefMI );` This statement is assigning the result of the `getInfoForVSETVLI` function, which takes the `DefMI` variable as an argument, to a new variable called `DefInfo` of type `VSETVLIInfo`." LLVM,RISCV,1626,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific inputs and the behavior of the functions called. However, based on the code snippet, it appears that the next statement will be a call to the `getVRegDef` function, which is a member of the `MachineRegisterInfo` class. This function is used to retrieve the definition of a virtual register, and it is likely that the next statement will be using the result of this function to perform some operation." LLVM,RISCV,1627,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `MachineInstr * DefMI = MRI->getVRegDef(InReg);` This line retrieves the definition of the virtual register `InReg` using the `getVRegDef` method of the `MachineRegisterInfo` class. The definition is stored in the `DefMI` variable." LLVM,RISCV,1628,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `InstrInfo.setVTYPE(VLMul, SEW, TailAgnostic, false, MaskRegOp);` This statement sets the `VTYPE` field of the `InstrInfo` object to the value of `VLMul`, `SEW`, `TailAgnostic`, `false`, and `MaskRegOp`." LLVM,RISCV,1629,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `LMul = Fractional ? ( / LMul ) : ( LMul * ) ;` This is a ternary operator that assigns a value to `LMul` based on the value of `Fractional`. If `Fractional` is true, `LMul` is assigned the value of ` / LMul`. Otherwise, `LMul` is assigned the value of `LMul * `." LLVM,RISCV,1630,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the code depends on various factors such as the input data, the implementation of the `BlockData` function, and the specific environment in which the code is running. However, based on the information provided, it is likely that the `BlockData` function is a function that takes a block of data as input and performs some operation on it. The function is then called with an empty block of data, which means that the function will not have any data to operate on. Therefore, the next statement of" LLVM,RISCV,1631,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the code depends on various factors such as the input data, the implementation of the `BlockData` function, and the specific environment in which the code is running. However, based on the information provided, it is likely that the `BlockData` function is a function that takes a block of data as input and performs some operation on it. The function is then called with an empty block of data, which means that the function will not have any data to operate on. Therefore, the next statement of" LLVM,RISCV,1632,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `BBInfo.Pred = InInfo.intersect(BlockInfo[P->getNumber()].Exit);` Explanation: The code snippet is initializing the `BBInfo` object, which is an instance of the `VSETVLIInfo` class. The `BBInfo` object has two fields: `Pred` and `Exit`. The `Pred` field is initialized with the intersection of the `InInfo` object and the `Exit` field of the `BlockInfo` object for each predecessor of the current basic block" LLVM,RISCV,1633,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `const MachineOperand &VLMul = MI.getOperand(NumOperands - 1);`" LLVM,RISCV,1634,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `BBInfo.Change.isValid()`" LLVM,RISCV,1635,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `BBInfo.Change = ( ) ;` This statement is executed if the current instruction is a call, inline assembly, or modifies a register. The `` placeholder is used to indicate that the string literal is not specified in the code snippet." LLVM,RISCV,1636,"The next statement of this code snippet is: return new InsertVSETVLIPass();" LLVM,RISCV,1637,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the code depends on the specific implementation of the `InsertVSETVLI` method and the data being processed. However, based on the name of the method and the fact that it is being called with no arguments, it is likely that the method is being used to insert a new value into a data structure, such as a list or an array. The `return` statement suggests that the method is returning a reference to the newly inserted value. Without more information about the specific implementation of the `Insert" LLVM,RISCV,1638,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `MI = MRI->getVRegDef(MI->getOperand().getReg());` This statement assigns the result of the `getVRegDef` method of the `MRI` object to the `MI` variable. The `getVRegDef` method takes a register number as an argument, which is obtained by calling the `getReg` method on the operand of the `MI` object at index ``." LLVM,RISCV,1639,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `elideCopies` function and the input data. However, based on the name of the function and the parameters, it is likely that the next statement will be related to the elimination of redundant copies in the machine instruction stream. Some possible next statements could include: * Checking if the current instruction is a copy instruction and if it is redundant, in which case it would be removed from the stream. * Searching for other copy instructions that can be eliminated," LLVM,RISCV,1640,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet without knowing the specific context and the implementation of the `MachineInstr` and `BlockInfo` classes. However, based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the next statement will be an `if` statement that checks whether the `CurInfo` object is valid. If it is not valid, the code will enter the `if` block and perform some checks and operations on the `BlockInfo` object. If `CurInfo` is valid, the code will enter the `else` block and perform some checks and operations on the `NewInfo` object" LLVM,RISCV,1641,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it appears to be part of a larger program and the context is not provided. However, based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the next statement will be: `MI . getOperand ( ) . setIsDead ( false ) ;` This statement sets the `IsDead` flag of the operand at index `` to `false`. The `IsDead` flag is used to indicate whether an operand is dead, meaning that it is" LLVM,RISCV,1642,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return AVLImm;` This statement returns the value of the `AVLImm` variable, which is the result of the `hasAVLImm()` function." LLVM,RISCV,1643,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return AVLImm;`" LLVM,RISCV,1644,"The next statement after the `assert` statement is the `return` statement. The `return` statement will return the value of the `AVLReg` variable, which is the result of the `hasAVLReg()` function." LLVM,RISCV,1645,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `NewInfo.setAVLReg(AVLReg);` This statement sets the `AVLReg` field of the `NewInfo` object to the value of `AVLReg`, which is a register obtained from the `getOperand` method of the `MI` object." LLVM,RISCV,1646,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `NewInfo.setVTYPE(MI.getOperand().getImm());` This statement sets the `VTYPE` field of the `NewInfo` object to the immediate value of the operand at index `` of the `MachineInstr` object `MI`." LLVM,RISCV,1647,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be a return statement, as the `getPassName()` method is expected to return a string value. Based on the code snippet, it appears that the `getPassName()` method is overriding a method from a base class or interface, and is returning a string literal that is defined as a constant in the code. The string literal is likely to be a name for the pass, and is being returned by the `getPassName()` method. Therefore, the next statement of this code snippet is likely to be a return statement that returns the string" LLVM,RISCV,1648,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the code depends on the specific values of the variables and the implementation of the functions being called. However, based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the function is returning a value from a variable named `_INSERT_VSETVLI_NAME`. This variable is likely a global variable or a static variable within the function, and its value is being returned by the function. Without more information about the code and the specific values of the variables, it is not possible" LLVM,RISCV,1649,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the program depends on various factors such as the input data, the specific implementation of the `getSEWLMULRatio` method, and the overall control flow of the program. However, based on the name of the method and the fact that it is declared as `const`, it is likely that the method returns a value that is related to the SEWL (Single-Ended Waveform) and MUL (Multiplier) ratios used in the program. The method may be used" LLVM,RISCV,1650,"The next statement after the `assert` statement is the `return` statement. The `assert` statement is used to check if the conditions specified in the parentheses are true, and if they are not, it will throw an `AssertionError`. The `return` statement will return the result of the `getSEWLMULRatio` function, which is called with the `SEW` and `VLMul` parameters." LLVM,RISCV,1651,"The next statement after the code snippet you provided is: `Info.setUnknown(); return Info;` This statement is a method call to the `setUnknown()` method of the `Info` object, which sets the `unknown` property of the `Info` object to `true`. The method returns the `Info` object, which is then returned by the `getInfo()` method." LLVM,RISCV,1652,"The next statement of this code snippet is: return State == AVLIsImm;" LLVM,RISCV,1653,"The next statement of this code snippet is: return State == AVLIsImm;" LLVM,RISCV,1654,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return State == AVLIsReg;` This statement is a return statement that returns the value of the expression `State == AVLIsReg`. The expression `State == AVLIsReg` is a comparison between the value of the `State` variable and the value of the `AVLIsReg` variable. If the two values are equal, the expression evaluates to `true`, otherwise it evaluates to `false`. Therefore, the next statement of this code snippet is to return the result of the comparison between `State` and `" LLVM,RISCV,1655,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return false;`" LLVM,RISCV,1656,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return getAVLReg() == Other.getAVLReg();`" LLVM,RISCV,1657,"It is difficult to determine the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `VSETVLIInfo` class and the values of the `isValid()` and `Other.isValid()` methods. However, based on the code provided, it is likely that the next statement will be a comparison of the `VLMAX` values of the two `VSETVLIInfo` objects. The `assert` statement checks that the current object and the `Other` object are both valid, and that the `VLMAX` value of the current object is less" LLVM,RISCV,1658,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return getSEWLMULRatio() == Other.getSEWLMULRatio();`" LLVM,RISCV,1659,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be the implementation of the `hasSameVTYPE` function, which compares the `VLMul`, `SEW`, `TailAgnostic`, and `MaskAgnostic` members of the `VSETVLIInfo` object with those of another `VSETVLIInfo` object. The function first checks that both objects are valid and not unknown, and that they do not have the `SEWLMULRatioOnly` flag set. It then compares the `VLMul`, `SEW`, `T" LLVM,RISCV,1660,"The next statement of this code snippet is: return SEWLMULRatioOnly;" LLVM,RISCV,1661,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `BuildMI(MBB, MI, DL, TII->get()).addReg(, RegState::Define | RegState::Dead).addReg(, RegState::Kill).addImm(Info.encodeVTYPE()).addReg(, RegState::Implicit);`" LLVM,RISCV,1662,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return *this;` Explanation: The `intersect` method is called on an object of type `VSETVLIInfo` with a parameter of type `const VSETVLIInfo &` named `Other`. The method checks if `Other` is valid by calling its `isValid` method. If `Other` is not valid, the method returns a reference to the current object (`*this`). Note that the `intersect` method is not defined in the code snippet you provided, so it's not possible" LLVM,RISCV,1663,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return true;` The code snippet is checking if the `InstrInfo` object has the same `VTYPE` and `VLMAX` as the current instruction, and if it is tail-agnostic and mask-agnostic. If all of these conditions are true, the function returns `true`. Otherwise, it returns `false`." LLVM,RISCV,1664,"The next statement after the `if` statement is the `return` statement. The `if` statement checks if `isUnknown()` or `hasSEWLMULRatioOnly()` is true, and if so, returns false. If neither of those conditions are true, then the `return` statement is executed and the function returns false." LLVM,RISCV,1665,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the `isUnknown` function is not specified. However, based on the name of the function and the fact that it is a member of a `const` object, it is likely that the function returns a boolean value indicating whether the object is in an unknown state." LLVM,RISCV,1666,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the `isUnknown` function is not specified. However, based on the name of the function and the fact that it is a member of a `const` object, it is likely that the function returns a boolean value indicating whether the object is in an unknown state." LLVM,RISCV,1667,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the `isValid()` function is not specified. However, based on the name of the function and the fact that it is declared as a `const` member function, it is likely that the function returns a boolean value indicating whether the object is in a valid state or not." LLVM,RISCV,1668,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return Other;` This statement is executed if the `isCompatible` function returns `false`. In this case, the function returns the `Other` object, which is the second argument passed to the `operator*` function." LLVM,RISCV,1669,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return Other;` Explanation: The `merge` function takes a `const` reference to a `VSETVLIInfo` object as an argument, and returns a new `VSETVLIInfo` object that is the result of merging the current object with the other object. The function first checks if the current object is valid and if the other object is valid. If the current object is not valid, it returns a reference to itself. If the other object is not valid, it returns a reference to the other object." LLVM,RISCV,1670,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty because it depends on the specific values of the variables and the behavior of the functions called. However, based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the function `needVSETVLI` is checking whether a certain instruction needs to be generated based on the current information and the requirements of the instruction. The function takes two arguments, `Require` and `CurInfo`, which are both instances of the `VSETVLIInfo` class. The function first checks if the current information is compatible with the requirements, and if it is" LLVM,RISCV,1671,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet without knowing the specific values of the variables and the implementation of the functions being called. However, based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the code is checking if a certain condition is met, and if it is not, it returns false. Here is a possible next statement: `if (DefInfo.hasSameAVL(CurInfo) && DefInfo.hasSameVTYPE(CurInfo)) { return false; }` This statement checks if the `DefInfo` object has the same `AVL` and `" LLVM,RISCV,1672,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `if (PHI->getNumOperands() > 0) {` This is because the `for` loop is only entered if the number of operands in the `PHI` instruction is greater than 0. If the number of operands is 0, the loop will not be entered and the next statement after the loop will be executed." LLVM,RISCV,1673,"The next statement after the code snippet you provided is likely to be a call to the `runOnFunction` method of the `InsertVSETVLIPass` class, which is a subclass of the `FunctionPass` class. Here is an example of what the next statement might look like: ``` InsertVSETVLIPass::runOnFunction(Function &F) { // Code to insert VSETVLI instructions into the function } ``` This method is called by the `runOnModule` method of the `ModulePass` class, which is a subclass of the `" LLVM,RISCV,1674,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be the definition of the `initializeInsertVSETVLIPass` function, which is called by the `InsertVSETVLI` function. Here is a possible definition of the `initializeInsertVSETVLIPass` function: ``` void initializeInsertVSETVLIPass(PassRegistry &Registry) { // Register the pass with the pass registry Registry.addPass(new InsertV" LLVM,RISCV,1675,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific values of the variables and the behavior of the functions called. However, based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the next statement will be a call to the `computeVLVTYPEChanges` function, passing in the current `MachineBasicBlock` as an argument. The `computeVLVTYPEChanges` function is not defined in the code snippet provided, so it is not possible to determine exactly what it does or what its return value will be. However, based on the name of the function" LLVM,RISCV,1676,"The next statement of this code snippet is: AVLImm = Imm;" LLVM,RISCV,1677,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific values of the variables and the logic of the program. However, based on the code snippet provided, it is likely that the next statement will be: AVLReg = Reg ; This statement assigns the value of the variable Reg to the variable AVLReg." LLVM,RISCV,1678,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the `setAVLReg` function depends on the specific implementation of the `Register` class and the `AVL` class. However, based on the name of the function and the parameter it takes, it is likely that the function sets the value of a register in the AVL class to the value of the `Reg` parameter." LLVM,RISCV,1679,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the code depends on the specific implementation of the `State` variable and the `Unknown` value. However, based on the syntax and the context of the code, it is likely that the next statement will be an assignment to the `State` variable, setting its value to the `Unknown` value." LLVM,RISCV,1680,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the code depends on the specific values of the input parameters and the implementation of the `isValid` and `isUnknown` functions. However, based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the next statement will be an assignment to the `VLMul` field of the current object, as the previous statement is an assertion that the current object is valid and not unknown, and the next statement is an assignment to a field of the current object." LLVM,RISCV,1681,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `VSETVLIInfo` function and the values of the input parameters. However, based on the names of the parameters and the fact that the function appears to be setting up a vector instruction, it is likely that the next statement will be a call to a vector instruction that uses the information set up by `VSETVLIInfo`. Without more information about the specific implementation of the `VSETVLIInfo` function and the surrounding code, it is not possible to provide a more" LLVM,RISCV,1682,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `VSETVLIInfo` function and the values of the input parameters. However, based on the names of the parameters and the fact that the function appears to be setting up a vector instruction, it is likely that the next statement will be a call to a vector instruction that uses the information set up by `VSETVLIInfo`. Without more information about the specific implementation of the `VSETVLIInfo` function and the surrounding code, it is not possible to provide a more" LLVM,RISCV,1683,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific values of the variables and the implementation of the `getOperand` and `getImm` methods. However, based on the code snippet, it appears that the next statement will be a call to the `getImm` method of the object returned by the `getOperand` method, passing in the value of the `OpNum` variable as an argument. The return value of this method will be assigned to the `Value` variable." LLVM,RISCV,1684,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be: O << '(' << getRegisterName(Base) << ')' ; This statement is continuing the output of the previous statement, which was: O << '(' ; The statement is outputting the value of the `Base` register, which is a pointer to the base of the current stack frame, and is surrounded by parentheses. The `getRegisterName` function is being used to get the name of the register, which is then output to the stream `O`." LLVM,RISCV,1685,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `O << ""bdaddr("" << MI->getOperand(OpNum).getReg() << "")"";` This statement is printing the `bdaddr` operand of the instruction, which is a register operand. The `getOperand` method is used to retrieve the operand at the specified index `OpNum`, and the `getReg` method is used to retrieve the register number of the operand. The `<<` operator is used to concatenate the string ""bdaddr("" with the register number, and the resulting string is" LLVM,RISCV,1686,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet without knowing the specific implementation of the `printBDXAddrOperand` function. However, based on the name of the function and the parameters it takes, it appears to be a function that prints an address operand for the BDX instruction set architecture. The function takes three parameters: * `MI`: a pointer to the `MCInst` object representing the instruction being printed. * `OpNum`: the operand number of the address operand to be printed. * `O`: a reference to the output stream where the" LLVM,RISCV,1687,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `if (MI->getOperand(opNum)->isImm()) { OS << ; }` This statement checks if the operand at index `opNum` is an immediate value, and if so, it prints the string literal `` to the output stream `OS`." LLVM,RISCV,1688,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be: `OS << MI -> getOperand ( opNum ) . getImm ( ) ;` This is because the code checks if the operand at index `opNum` is an immediate value using the `isImm()` method, and if it is, it gets the immediate value using the `getImm()` method and prints it to the output stream `OS`." LLVM,RISCV,1689,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `printOperand(MI, OpNum, O);`" LLVM,RISCV,1690,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be a conditional statement that checks the value of `Imm` and performs different actions based on its value. The code snippet defines an array of constant strings called `CondNames`, and then initializes a variable `Imm` to the immediate value of the operand at index `OpNum` of a machine instruction. The `assert` statement checks that `Imm` is greater than a certain value and less than another certain value, and also checks that `Imm` is equal to a specific string literal. Based on this information, it is" Compiler Type,Target,Idx,Des LLVM,RISCV,1691,The next statement in this code snippet is `OS << SRE->getSymbol();`. LLVM,RISCV,1692,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `printInstruction(MI, O);` This statement calls the `printInstruction` function with the `MI` and `O` arguments. The `printInstruction` function is not defined in the code snippet provided, so it is not possible to determine what it does. However, based on the name of the function, it is likely that it prints the instruction represented by the `MI` argument to the `O` output stream, possibly with some additional annotation or formatting based on the `Annot` and `STI` arguments." LLVM,RISCV,1693,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `printInstruction(MI, O);` This statement calls the `printInstruction` function with the current instruction `MI` and the output stream `O`. The `printInstruction` function is responsible for printing the instruction to the output stream." LLVM,RISCV,1694,"I cannot predict the next statement of this code snippet as it is not a complete code snippet. The code snippet appears to be defining a function called `printMemOperand` that takes three arguments: `MI`, `opNum`, and `OS`. The function appears to be printing an operand and a register name to the output stream `OS`. However, the exact behavior of the function cannot be determined without more context." LLVM,RISCV,1695,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be: `OS << getRegisterName ( MI -> getOperand ( opNum ) . getReg ( ) ) ;` This statement is using the `getRegisterName` function to get the name of the register that is being used as an operand in the machine instruction. The `getOperand` function is being called on the `MI` object to get the operand at the specified index `opNum`, and then the `getReg` function is being called on the operand to get the register that it is using. The resulting" LLVM,RISCV,1696,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the program depends on the specific inputs and the implementation of the `printOperand` and `getOperand` functions. However, based on the syntax and the context of the code, it is likely that the next statement will be a call to the `printOperand` function, passing the result of the `getOperand` function as the first argument and the value of the `O` variable as the second argument. Therefore, the next statement of this code snippet is likely to be:" LLVM,RISCV,1697,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the program depends on the specific inputs and the implementation of the `printOperand` and `getOperand` functions. However, based on the syntax and the context of the code, it is likely that the next statement will be a call to the `printOperand` function, passing the result of the `getOperand` function as the first argument and the value of the `O` variable as the second argument. Therefore, the next statement of this code snippet is likely to be:" LLVM,RISCV,1698,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the `printRegName` function is dependent on the specific implementation of the `InstPrinter` class and the values of the `O` and `RegNo` parameters. However, based on the name of the function and the parameters it takes, it is likely that the next statement of the code snippet will be a call to the `printRegName` function, passing in the `O` and `RegNo` parameters. The function will then print the name of the register specified by `RegNo`" LLVM,RISCV,1699,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of the code snippet with certainty because it depends on the specific values of the variables and the implementation of the `MI` and `getOperand` functions. However, based on the code snippet, it appears that the `getOperand` function is being called with the `OpNum` argument, and the return value of the function is being checked to see if it is an immediate value. If the return value is an immediate value, then the `isImm` function is being called on it to determine if it is an immediate value." LLVM,RISCV,1700,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be: `O << Value;` This is because the previous line of code, `int64_t Value = MI -> getOperand ( OpNum ) . getImm ( ) ;`, retrieves the immediate value of the operand at index `OpNum` and stores it in the variable `Value`. The next line of code is likely to be the one that prints the value of `Value` to the output stream `O`." LLVM,RISCV,1701,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `O << Value;` Explanation: The code snippet is checking if the operand is an immediate value (i.e., `MI->getOperand(OpNum).isImm()`) and if it is, it gets the immediate value using `MI->getOperand(OpNum).getImm()` and stores it in the variable `Value`. Then, it checks if the value is within the range of a certain type (e.g., `isInt`) and if it is, it" LLVM,RISCV,1702,"The code snippet is printing the value of a machine instruction's operand to a stream. The operand is retrieved using the `getOperand()` method of a `MI` object, and its immediate value is retrieved using the `getImm()` method. The immediate value is then cast to a signed integer using the `isInt` function. The next statement of the code snippet will be: `O << Value;` This statement will print the value of the immediate operand to the stream `O`." LLVM,RISCV,1703,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `O << Value;` This statement is a call to the left shift operator, which shifts the bits of `Value` to the left by the number of bits specified by `OpNum`. The result of the shift is then written to the output stream `O`." LLVM,RISCV,1704,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the code depends on the specific values of the variables and the implementation of the `getOperand` and `getImm` methods. However, based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the next statement will be a call to the `getImm` method of the object returned by the `getOperand` method, passing in the value of the `OpNum` variable as an argument. The `getImm` method is likely to return an integer value, which will be assigned to the" LLVM,RISCV,1705,"The next statement after the given code snippet is likely to be: `O << Value;` This is because the code snippet ends with a semicolon, indicating the end of a statement, and the next statement is likely to be a continuation of the same statement. Additionally, the syntax of the code snippet suggests that it is part of a larger expression or statement that involves the output stream `O` and the value `Value`." LLVM,RISCV,1706,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `Value = MI->getOperand(OpNum)->getImm();`" LLVM,RISCV,1707,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty because it depends on the specific values of the variables and the implementation of the `getOperand` and `getImm` methods. However, based on the code snippet, it appears that the next statement will be to write the value of `Value` to the output stream `O`." LLVM,RISCV,1708,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `Value = MI->getOperand(OpNum)->getImm();`" LLVM,RISCV,1709,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be: `O << ;` This is because the previous statement `assert ( MO . isReg ( ) && ) ;` checks if the `MO` object is a register and if the string literal is not empty. If both conditions are true, then the next statement will be executed, which is the output of the string literal to the output stream `O`." LLVM,RISCV,1710,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific values of the variables and the behavior of the functions being called. However, based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the next statement will be a call to the `isReg` function, which is a member function of the `MCOperand` class. This function is likely to return a boolean value indicating whether the operand is a register or not. The next statement after that will likely be a call to the `<<` operator, which is a member function of the `O` object" LLVM,RISCV,1711,"The code snippet you provided is a part of a function called `printFenceArg` that is part of a class called `InstPrinter`. The function takes three arguments: `MI`, `OpNo`, and `O`. The function first retrieves the operand at index `OpNo` from the `MCInst` object `MI` using the `getOperand` method. It then retrieves the immediate value of the operand using the `getImm` method. The function then checks the value of the immediate operand against a series of bitmasks using the bitwise AND" LLVM,RISCV,1712,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `O << 'i';` Explanation: The code snippet is checking the value of `FenceArg` against a specific bit pattern (represented by ``) and if the result of the bitwise AND operation is not equal to ``, it will print the character 'i' to the output stream `O`." LLVM,RISCV,1713,"Based on the code snippet you provided, it appears that the next statement will be: `if (MO.isMem()) { ... }` This is because the previous `if` statement checks if `MO` is a register or an immediate value, and if it is not, it will check if it is a memory operand. If `MO` is a memory operand, the code will enter the `if` block and execute the code inside it." LLVM,RISCV,1714,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `MO` object and the value of the `` constant. However, based on the syntax and the fact that the `MO` object is being checked for immutability, it is likely that the next statement will be a call to a method or function that operates on the `MO` object, such as `MO.getImm()` or `MO.setImm()`." LLVM,RISCV,1715,"This code snippet is part of a function that is operating on a machine instruction (MI) and generating a string representation of the instruction. The first line of the snippet retrieves the operand at position `OpNo` from the instruction. The second line asserts that the operand is an immediate value (i.e., a constant) and that its value is equal to the string literal ``. The third line retrieves the immediate value of the operand and adds the numeric literal `` to it. The result is then appended to the" LLVM,RISCV,1716,"The next statement of this code snippet is: O << << Sew << << Lmul; This statement is a call to the insertion operator (<<) on the output stream O, with the following arguments: * : A string literal that is output to the stream. * Sew: The value of the Sew variable, which is a shifted version of the Imm variable. * Lmul: The value of the Lmul variable, which is a shifted version of the Imm variable" LLVM,RISCV,1717,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `if (NoAliases || !printAliasInstr(NewMI, STI, O)) printInstruction(NewMI, STI, O);` This statement checks if the instruction is an alias instruction and if it should be printed. If the instruction is not an alias or if it should be printed, the `printInstruction` function is called to print the instruction." LLVM,RISCV,1718,"The next statement of this code snippet is: O << << Lmul; This is because the code is currently inside the `else` block, which means that the `if` condition was not met, and the code is executing the `else` block. The first statement inside the `else` block is `Lmul = << Lmul;`, which updates the value of `Lmul`. The next statement is `O << << Lmul;`, which writes the value of `Lmul` to the output stream" LLVM,RISCV,1719,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `O << ""c"" << Imm;` This statement is printing the value of the immediate operand `Imm` to the output stream `O`, with a leading ""c"" character." LLVM,RISCV,1720,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific values of the variables and the behavior of the functions being called. However, based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the next statement will be: O << SpecialCapReg -> Name; This statement will print the name of the special capability register to the output stream O. The name of the register is obtained from the SpecialCapReg object, which is created based on the immediate value of the operand." LLVM,RISCV,1721,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty because the code is incomplete and there are multiple possible paths that the program could take. However, based on the information provided, it is likely that the next statement will be: `NoAliases = true;` This is because the first `if` statement checks if `Opt` is equal to ``, and if it is, it sets `NoAliases` to `true` and returns `true`. If the first `if` statement is not executed, then the second `if` statement" LLVM,RISCV,1722,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `getOperand` method and the value of the `OpNo` parameter. However, based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the next statement will be a call to the `isReg` method of the `MCOperand` class, which will return a boolean value indicating whether the operand is a register or not. If the operand is a register, the next statement will likely be a call to the `getReg` method of the `MCOperand" LLVM,RISCV,1723,"The code snippet is a C++ code that is checking the value of an operand of a machine instruction. It is using the `getOperand()` and `getImm()` methods to retrieve the operand and its immediate value, respectively. The code is then performing a bitwise AND operation on the operand and a string literal, and checking if the result is equal to a specific value. If the result is not equal, it is printing the character 'i' or 'o' to the output stream `O`. Based on the information provided, it is not possible to predict the next statement" LLVM,RISCV,1724,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `printInstruction(NewMI, Address, STI, O);` This is because the `if` statement that follows the `if (NoAliases || !printAliasInstr(NewMI, Address, STI, O))` condition is not executed, so the `printInstruction` function is called with the same arguments as before." LLVM,RISCV,1725,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the code depends on the specific values of the variables and the implementation of the functions being called. However, based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the next statement will be: ``` Res = DecompressInstruction(NewMI, &UncompressedMI); ``` This statement calls the `DecompressInstruction` function, passing in the `NewMI` pointer and the address of the `UncompressedMI` variable. The function will decompress the instruction pointed to by" LLVM,RISCV,1726,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `printRegName ( O , MO . getReg ( ) ) ;` This is because the code snippet is checking if the operand is a register using the `isReg()` method, and if it is, it will print the register name using the `printRegName()` function." LLVM,RISCV,1727,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be: `O << Imm;` This is because the previous line of code, `unsigned Imm = MI -> getOperand ( OpNo ) . getImm ( ) ;`, retrieves the immediate value of the operand at index `OpNo` from the `MCInst` object `MI` and stores it in the variable `Imm`. The next statement is likely to be a call to the `<<` operator on the `O` object, which is a `raw_ostream` object, and the `Imm`" LLVM,RISCV,1728,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `printVType` function and the value of the `Imm` variable. However, based on the code snippet provided, it is likely that the next statement will be a call to the `printVType` function with the `Imm` variable as an argument." LLVM,RISCV,1729,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the functions involved and the data being processed. However, based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the next statement after the `if` statement would be the assignment of `NewMI` to the result of `const_cast < MCInst * > ( & UncompressedMI )`." LLVM,RISCV,1730,"Based on the code snippet you provided, it appears to be a part of a switch statement in C++. The next statement would be: `case :` This is because the previous case statement has a break statement at the end, which means that the control flow will exit the switch statement and continue with the next statement outside the switch. The next case statement is `case :`, which is the next label in the switch statement." LLVM,RISCV,1731,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `O << "" "";` This statement is adding a space to the output stream `O`." LLVM,RISCV,1732,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be: O << << Ediv; Explanation: The code snippet is printing the values of the VTypeImm operand, which is a 32-bit immediate value. The value is extracted from the MCInst object using the getOperand() and getImm() methods. The value is then split into its various fields using bitwise operations, and the resulting values are printed to the output stream using the << operator. The next statement is likely to be printing the Ediv field, which is the" LLVM,RISCV,1733,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty because the behavior of the code depends on the values of the variables `Imm`, `Sew`, `Lmul`, and `Ediv`, which are not specified in the code snippet. However, based on the names of the variables and the operations being performed, it is likely that the next statement of the code will be a calculation involving the values of these variables. For example, it could be a statement that sets the value of `Sew` to the result of a bitwise AND operation between `Imm` and a constant" LLVM,RISCV,1734,"This code snippet is printing an operand of a machine instruction. The operand is an immediate value, and the code is casting it to a string and printing it to an output stream. The next statement of this code snippet would be to print the string representation of the FRMArg to the output stream." LLVM,RISCV,1735,"The next statement after the `if` statement in the code snippet is `printInstruction ( MI , O ) ;`." LLVM,RISCV,1736,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the values of the variables and the specific implementation of the code. However, based on the information provided, it appears that the code is attempting to perform some bitwise operations on the variable `Imm` and output the results to the variable `O`. The first `if` statement checks if the variable `Fractional` is true, and if so, it performs some bitwise operations on `Lmul` and `Imm` and outputs the results to `O`. If `Fractional` is false" LLVM,RISCV,1737,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific values of the variables and the behavior of the `isReg` and `isImm` methods. However, based on the code snippet you provided, it appears that the next statement will be executed if `MC.isReg()` returns `true`. If this is the case, then the next statement will be `O << getRegisterName(MC.getReg())`. If `MC.isReg()` returns `false`, then the next statement will be executed if `MC.isIm" LLVM,RISCV,1738,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `O << getRegisterName(MC.getReg());` This is because the `if` statement checks if `MC.isReg()` is true, and if it is, it executes the code inside the `if` block, which is `O << getRegisterName(MC.getReg());`." LLVM,RISCV,1739,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty because it depends on the specific values of the variables and the implementation of the `getOperand` and `getImm` methods. However, based on the code snippet, it appears that the next statement will be to write the value of `Value` to the output stream `O`." LLVM,RISCV,1740,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the program depends on the specific values of the variables and the implementation of the `getOperand` and `getImm` methods. However, based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the program is attempting to retrieve an immediate value from an operand and then checking if it is a valid unsigned integer literal. If the value is not a valid unsigned integer literal, the `assert` statement will fail and the program will terminate. Therefore, the next statement of this code snippet could potentially be" LLVM,RISCV,1741,"This code snippet is printing an immediate operand of a machine instruction. The operand is assumed to be a 32-bit unsigned integer. The code is using the LLVM library to access the instruction and its operands. The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be a call to the `printImm` function, which will print the immediate value of the operand. The function will take the value of the operand and the output stream as arguments." LLVM,RISCV,1742,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific values of the variables and the implementation of the `getOperand` and `getImm` methods. However, based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the next statement will be to output the value of `Value` to the output stream `O`." LLVM,RISCV,1743,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be: `O << formatHex ( Value ) ;` This is because the code is currently printing the immediate value of the operand, and the `formatHex` function is typically used to format a value as a hexadecimal string." LLVM,RISCV,1744,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be: `O << formatHex ( Value ) ;` This is because the code is currently printing the immediate value of the operand, and the `formatHex` function is typically used to format a value as a hexadecimal string." LLVM,RISCV,1745,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific values of the variables and the behavior of the `getOperand` and `getImm` methods. However, based on the code snippet, it appears that the `getOperand` method is being called on the `MI` object with the `OpNum` argument, and the result is being stored in the `Value` variable. If the `getOperand` method returns a non-null value, then the `getImm` method is being called on the result, and the" LLVM,RISCV,1746,"The next statement of this code snippet is: O << 'o' ;" LLVM,RISCV,1747,"The next statement of this code snippet is: O << 'r' ; Explanation: The first if statement checks if the bitwise AND of FenceArg and a string literal is not equal to a numeric literal. If this condition is true, the statement 'o' is printed to the output stream O. The second if statement checks the same condition as the first if statement, but with a different string literal and numeric literal. If this condition is also true, the statement 'r' is printed to the output stream O. Therefore, the next statement of this code" LLVM,RISCV,1748,"The next statement after the `if` statement is: ``` if (Res) { NewMI = &UncompressedMI; } ``` This statement assigns the address of the `UncompressedMI` object to the `NewMI` pointer if the `Res` variable is true." LLVM,RISCV,1749,"The next statement after the `if` statement in the code snippet is `printInstruction ( MI , STI , O ) ;`." LLVM,RISCV,1750,The next statement after `ArchRegNames = true;` would be `return true;`. LLVM,RISCV,1751,"The next statement after the code snippet you provided is likely to be the return statement, which is the last statement in the function. The function `getRegisterName` is called with two arguments: `RegNo` and `ArchRegNames`. The first argument is the register number, and the second argument is a string literal that represents the architecture-specific register names. The function returns a string that represents the register name for the given register number and architecture. The return value is determined by the `getRegisterName` function, which is not shown in the code snippet you provided." LLVM,RISCV,1752,"Based on the code snippet you provided, it appears to be a part of a function that is printing out information about an instruction. The function takes in a number of parameters, including a `MO` object, an `OpNo`, a `STI` object, and an `O` object. The first `if` statement checks if the `MO` object is not an immediate operand, and if it is not, it returns the result of calling the `printOperand` function with the `MI`, `OpNo`, `STI`, and `O` objects as arguments. The second" LLVM,RISCV,1753,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the code depends on the specific values of the variables and the implementation of the functions involved. However, based on the syntax and the fact that the `SysReg` variable is being assigned the result of a function call, it is likely that the next statement will be a call to a function that takes `SysReg` as an argument. The function may modify the value of `SysReg` or use it in some other way. Without more information about the code, it is not possible to predict exactly" LLVM,RISCV,1754,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific values of the variables and the implementation of the `haveRequiredFeatures` method. However, based on the code snippet, it appears that the next statement will be: `O << SysReg->Name;` This statement will print the name of the system register to the output stream `O`." LLVM,RISCV,1755,"Based on the code snippet you provided, it appears to be a part of a larger program that is using the C++ programming language. The code is using the `assert` statement to check if a certain condition is true, and if it is not, it will print out an error message. The condition being checked is that the value of `FenceArg` is equal to a specific value, which is determined by the bitwise AND operation of `FenceArg` with a specific string literal. The string literal is a hexadecimal value that is being converted to an integer using the `getImm`" LLVM,RISCV,1756,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the values of the variables and the specific implementation of the `assert` and `O` functions. However, based on the information provided, it appears that the code is checking the value of `FenceArg` against a set of literals and performing some bitwise operations. The first part of the code, `assert ( ( ( FenceArg >> ) == ) && ) ;`, is checking whether the value of `F" LLVM,RISCV,1757,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be a call to the `getOperand()` method of the `MI` object, passing in the `OpNo` variable as an argument. The return value of this method is then passed to the `getImm()` method of the `FRMArg` object, which is likely to be a `std::string` object. The return value of this method is then assigned to the `FRMArg` variable. Here is the predicted next statement: ``` FRMArg = MI->getOperand(OpNo)->getImm();" LLVM,RISCV,1758,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of the code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific inputs and the behavior of the `uncompressInst` function. However, based on the code snippet provided, it is likely that the next statement will be: `Res = uncompressInst(UncompressedMI, *MI, MRI, STI);` This statement is likely to be executed if the `PrintAliases` flag is set and the `NoAliases` flag is not set. The `uncompressInst` function is called with the `Uncom" LLVM,RISCV,1759,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific values of the variables and the behavior of the functions called. However, based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the next statement will be: `NewMI = const_cast < MCInst * > ( & UncompressedMI ) ;` This statement is assigning the address of the `UncompressedMI` variable to the `NewMI` variable, which is a pointer to a `MCInst` object. The `const_cast` is used to remove the `const` qual" LLVM,RISCV,1760,"Based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the next statement will be: printImm ( O , MO . getImm ( ) ) ;" LLVM,RISCV,1761,This code snippet is printing a zero offset memory operand. The next statement is likely to be printing the offset of the memory operand. LLVM,RISCV,1762,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `InstPrinter::InstPrinter(const MCAsmInfo &MAI, const MCInstrInfo &MII, const MCRegisterInfo &MRI) : MCInstPrinter(MAI, MII, MRI) {` This is a constructor for the `InstPrinter` class, which is derived from the `MCInstPrinter` class. The constructor initializes the `InstPrinter` object with the given `MCAsmInfo`, `MCInstrInfo`, and `MCRegisterInfo` objects." LLVM,RISCV,1763,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `InstPrinter::InstPrinter(const MCAsmInfo &MAI, const MCInstrInfo &MII, const MCRegisterInfo &MRI) : MCInstPrinter(MAI, MII, MRI) {` This is a constructor for the `InstPrinter` class, which is derived from the `MCInstPrinter` class. The constructor initializes the `InstPrinter` object with the given `MCAsmInfo`, `MCInstrInfo`, and `MCRegisterInfo` objects." LLVM,RISCV,1764,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be: `MMO->setOffset(Offset);` This is because the previous line of code, `MachineMemOperand * MMO = MF.getMachineMemOperand(...);`, creates a new `MachineMemOperand` object and assigns it to the variable `MMO`. The next logical step would be to set the offset of this memory operand using the `setOffset` method." LLVM,RISCV,1765,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `MachineFrame` and `MachineMemOperand` classes, as well as the values of the variables `MF`, `FI`, `Offset`, `Flags`, and `MFFrame`. However, based on the naming conventions and the context of the code, it is likely that the next statement will be a call to the `addMemOperand` method of the `MachineInstrBuilder` class, passing in the `MachineMemOperand` object created by the previous line" LLVM,RISCV,1766,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return MIB.addImm(Offset).addFrameIndex(FI).addMemOperand(MMO);` This statement is a return statement that returns a value of type `MachineInstrBuilder` from the function. The value is constructed by calling the `addImm`, `addFrameIndex`, and `addMemOperand` methods on the `MIB` object, passing in the `Offset` variable, the `FI` variable, and the `MMO` object, respectively. These methods are used to add immediate values, frame" LLVM,RISCV,1767,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `unsigned Reg;` This statement declares a variable `Reg` of type `unsigned`." LLVM,RISCV,1768,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `unsigned Reg;` This line declares a variable `Reg` of type `unsigned`." LLVM,RISCV,1769,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific inputs and the behavior of the functions called. However, based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the next statement will be: `FBB = TBB;` This is because the code snippet ends with a `continue` statement, which will cause the loop to continue executing with the next iteration. The value of `FBB` is set to the value of `TBB` at the end of the loop, so the next statement will be to set `FBB` to the value of" LLVM,RISCV,1770,"Based on the code snippet you provided, it appears to be part of a function that is handling a specific instruction in a disassembler. The function is checking the contents of the `DestReg` and `SrcReg` registers to determine the appropriate instruction opcode to use. The first `if` statement checks if the `DestReg` register contains a specific value, and if the `SrcReg` register contains a specific value. If both conditions are true, the function sets the `Opcode` variable to a specific value and then calls the `BuildMI` function with the `Opcode`" LLVM,RISCV,1771,"The next statement of this code snippet is: case ARM::t2MOVr: This is because the `expandPostRAPseudo` function is checking the opcode of the instruction `MI` and returning `true` if it is a `t2MOVr` instruction." LLVM,RISCV,1772,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the `expandPostRAPseudo` method is dependent on the specific implementation of the `InstrInfo` class and the machine instruction being processed. However, based on the name of the method and the fact that it is being called on an iterator over a `MachineBasicBlock`, it is likely that the method is responsible for expanding a pseudo-instruction that is located after a return address pointer (RAP) in the machine code. The method may be using the `MI` iterator to" LLVM,RISCV,1773,"The next statement of this code snippet is: return ( STI . isRV64 ( ) || STI . isRV32 ( ) ) ? : ; This statement is a ternary operator, which is a shorthand for an if-else statement. The condition of the ternary operator is ( STI . isRV64 ( ) || STI . isRV32 ( ) ), which checks if the current instruction is a 64-bit or 32-bit instruction." LLVM,RISCV,1774,"The next statement of this code snippet is: return ( STI . isRV64 ( ) || STI . isRV32 ( ) ) ? : ; This statement is a ternary operator, which is a shorthand for an if-else statement. The condition of the ternary operator is ( STI . isRV64 ( ) || STI . isRV32 ( ) ), which checks if the current instruction is a 64-bit or 32-bit instruction." LLVM,RISCV,1775,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific values of `Offset` and `Offset2`, as well as the implementation of the `isInt` function. However, based on the context of the code, it is likely that the next statement will be a comparison of `Opcode` to a specific value, or a call to a function that takes `Opcode` as an argument." LLVM,RISCV,1776,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific values of the variables and the implementation of the `isInt` function. However, based on the code provided, it appears that the function `getOpcodeForOffset` is trying to determine the opcode for a given offset. The function takes two arguments: `Opcode`, which is an unsigned integer representing the opcode, and `Offset`, which is a signed integer representing the offset. The function first checks if `Offset` is an integer within the range of the `isInt` function, which" LLVM,RISCV,1777,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `count++;`" LLVM,RISCV,1778,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it appears to be a part of a larger program and the context is not provided. However, based on the syntax and structure of the code, it appears to be a switch statement with multiple cases, each of which calls the `BuildMI` function with different arguments. The `addMBB` and `addReg` functions are also called within each case, but the specific arguments passed to these functions are not provided in the code snippet. The `llvm_unreachable` function is called in the `default` case" LLVM,RISCV,1779,"Based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the next statement will be another case statement with a similar structure to the previous ones. The next case statement will likely have a similar format to the previous ones, with a condition, a BuildMI function call, and several addReg function calls." LLVM,RISCV,1780,"Based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the next statement will be: Target = &MI->getOperand(); This is because the previous statement ended with a semicolon, indicating that it is a complete statement. The next statement begins with ""Target"", which is likely a variable name, and is followed by an assignment operator (=). The expression on the right-hand side of the assignment operator is a method call to ""getOperand"" with a single argument of , which is likely a numeric literal." LLVM,RISCV,1781,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet without knowing the specific implementation of the `InstrInfo` class and the `isLoadFromStackSlot` method. However, based on the name of the method and the parameters it takes, it appears to be a method that determines whether a given machine instruction is a load from a stack slot. If this is the case, then the next statement of the code snippet is likely to be a check of the instruction's opcode to determine whether it is a load instruction. The `isLoadFromStackSlot` method may then use the `" LLVM,RISCV,1782,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return isSimpleMove(MI, FrameIndex, );` This statement is a call to the `isSimpleMove` function, which is a member function of the `InstrInfo` class. The function takes three arguments: `MI`, `FrameIndex`, and ``. The return value of the function is a boolean value indicating whether the instruction is a simple move instruction that loads a value from a stack slot." LLVM,RISCV,1783,"Based on the code snippet you provided, it appears that the next statement after the `if` statement would be: `FrameIndex = MI->getOperand().getIndex();` This is because the `if` statement is checking a condition, and if that condition is true, it will execute the code inside the `if` block. In this case, the code inside the `if` block is setting the `FrameIndex` variable to the result of calling the `getIndex()` method on the operand of the instruction." LLVM,RISCV,1784,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be a call to the `isSimpleMove` function, which is a member function of the `InstrInfo` class. The function takes three arguments: a pointer to a `MachineInstr` object, a reference to an integer, and a string literal. The `isSimpleMove` function is likely to check if the given machine instruction is a simple move instruction, and if so, it will extract the source and destination operands of the move instruction and check if they are both stack slots. If both operands are stack slots, the function will" LLVM,RISCV,1785,"This code snippet is a part of a larger program that is generating machine code for a specific instruction set architecture (ISA). The code is using the LLVM library to generate the machine code. The code is defining a function called `loadImmediate` that takes several parameters: * `MBB`: a reference to a `MachineBasicBlock` object, which represents a basic block in the machine code. * `MBBI`: a reference to an iterator that points to a specific instruction in the `MachineBasicBlock`. * `Reg`: a pointer to an `unsigned` integer that will be set" LLVM,RISCV,1786,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the `getLoadStoreOpcodes` function is not specified. However, based on the names of the function and its parameters, it is likely that the function is used to retrieve the load and store opcodes for a particular register class (RC). The `LoadOpcode` and `StoreOpcode` parameters are likely to be output parameters that will be set to the appropriate load and store opcodes for the specified register class. Without more information about the specific implementation of the `getLoadStoreOpc" LLVM,RISCV,1787,The next statement after the `if` statement is `I->eraseFromParent()`. LLVM,RISCV,1788,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific values of the variables and the behavior of the functions called. However, based on the code snippet, it appears that the next statement will be: `I = Target->getNext();` This is because the code is currently iterating over the instructions in a basic block, and the `Target` variable is a pointer to the next instruction in the basic block. The `eraseFromParent` method is called on the current instruction `I`, which removes it from the basic block, and then the `" LLVM,RISCV,1789,"Based on the code snippet you provided, it appears to be a constructor for a class called `InstrInfo`. The constructor takes a reference to a `Subtarget` object as a parameter and initializes various member variables of the `InstrInfo` object. The next statement of this code snippet would likely be the initialization of the `GenInstrInfo` member variable, which is a base class of `InstrInfo`. The constructor for `GenInstrInfo` takes two string literals as parameters, so the next statement would likely be the initialization of these string literals. Without seeing the" LLVM,RISCV,1790,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be the initialization of the `RI` and `STI` members of the `InstrInfo` class, which are being passed the `sti` object as an argument. Here is the predicted next statement: ``` RI = new RI(sti); STI = new STI(sti); ``` This statement initializes the `RI` and `STI` members of the `InstrInfo` class with new instances of the `RI` and `STI` classes, respectively, and passes the `sti" LLVM,RISCV,1791,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be the call to the `addFrameReference` function, which takes the result of the `BuildMI` function as an argument. The `BuildMI` function is not defined in the code snippet you provided, so it is not possible to determine exactly what it does. However, based on the name of the function and the arguments it takes, it appears to be a function that builds a machine instruction (MI) object. The `addFrameReference` function is also not defined in the code snippet, but it is likely to be a function that adds a" LLVM,RISCV,1792,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `if ( NumTerminators > ) return true ;` This statement checks if the number of terminators in the basic block is greater than a certain value (represented by ``). If it is, the function returns `true`. Otherwise, the function continues to the next statement." LLVM,RISCV,1793,"The next statement of this code snippet is: int HighWidth = ( HighOffset == OffsetA ) ? WidthA : WidthB;" LLVM,RISCV,1794,"Based on the code snippet you provided, it appears that the next statement will be: `if (LowOffset == HighOffset) {` This is because the code is checking if the base operands of the two memory operands are identical, and if the low offset is equal to the high offset. If this condition is true, then the code will execute the statement inside the `if` block." LLVM,RISCV,1795,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the code depends on the specific implementation of the `addLiveIn` method and the value of the string literal. However, based on the name of the method and the fact that it is being called on an object of type `MBB`, it is likely that the method is adding a live input to the object, possibly by appending the string literal to a list of live inputs." LLVM,RISCV,1796,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be the `switch` statement, which is used to determine the opcode of the instruction and perform the appropriate action based on the opcode. The `switch` statement is followed by a series of `case` statements, each of which corresponds to a specific opcode and performs a specific action. The `default` case is also included, which is executed if the opcode is not recognized." LLVM,RISCV,1797,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet without knowing the context in which it is being executed. However, based on the code snippet provided, it appears to be part of a function that is handling a wide operand instruction. The function appears to be using a switch statement to determine the opcode of the instruction, and then using a series of case statements to handle each possible opcode. The case statements are using a macro called `CASE_WIDEOP_CHANGE_OPCODE_LMULS` to change the opcode of the instruction, and then using a `MachineInstrBuilder" LLVM,RISCV,1798,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific input and the behavior of the functions being called. However, based on the code snippet, it appears that the next statement will be a call to the `BuildMI` function, which is used to create a new machine instruction. The `BuildMI` function takes several arguments, including the basic block, the machine instruction, the debug location, and the new opcode. The function returns a machine instruction builder, which is then used to add operands to the instruction and copy implicit operands from the original instruction. Finally" LLVM,RISCV,1799,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `if (forwardCopyWillClobberTuple(DstEncoding, SrcEncoding, NF * LMul)) {` This statement checks if the forward copy of the tuple will clobber the destination tuple. If the forward copy will clobber the destination tuple, then the code will execute the `if` block. Otherwise, it will execute the `else` block." LLVM,RISCV,1800,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return std::make_pair(TF & Mask, TF & ~Mask);` This statement is a return statement that returns a pair of values. The first value in the pair is the result of the bitwise AND operation between `TF` and `Mask`, and the second value is the result of the bitwise AND operation between `TF` and the bitwise NOT of `Mask`." LLVM,RISCV,1801,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be a comparison of the result of the bitwise AND operation with the value of `NumRegs`. Here's a breakdown of the code: * `DstReg - SrcReg` calculates the difference between the destination register and the source register. * `& ` performs a bitwise AND operation on the result of the subtraction and the value of `NUM_LIT`. * `< NumRegs` compares the result of the bitwise AND operation with the value of `NumRegs`." LLVM,RISCV,1802,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the code depends on the specific implementation of the `MI` object and the `getNumExplicitOperands()` method. However, based on the name of the method, it is likely that the next statement will be related to the number of explicit operands of the `MI` object. Without more information about the specific implementation of the `MI` object and the `getNumExplicitOperands()` method, it is not possible to provide a more specific prediction." LLVM,RISCV,1803,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific values of the string literals and the return values of the functions. However, based on the syntax and structure of the code, it appears that the next statement will be a `case` statement with a string literal as the condition, followed by a `return` statement with a string literal as the return value." LLVM,RISCV,1804,"Based on the code snippet you provided, it appears to be a part of a switch statement in a function that is trying to determine the length of an inline assembly instruction. The function is taking a `MachineInstr` object as an argument and is using its `getOperand` method to retrieve the symbol name of the inline assembly instruction. The function is then using a `getInlineAsmLength` function to determine the length of the inline assembly instruction. The `getInlineAsmLength` function takes two arguments: the symbol name of the inline assembly instruction and a `MCAsmInfo` object" LLVM,RISCV,1805,"The next statement after the `if` block is: `Width = ( * LdSt . memoperands_begin ( ) ) -> getSize ( ) ;` This statement assigns the size of the memory operand to the `Width` variable." LLVM,RISCV,1806,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `const MachineOperand * BaseReg = nullptr;` This statement initializes the `BaseReg` variable to `nullptr`, which means that it is not pointing to any valid memory location. The `BaseReg` variable is used to store the base register of the memory operand, and it is initialized to `nullptr` because the function has not yet found a valid base register." LLVM,RISCV,1807,"The next statement of this code snippet is: return MCInstBuilder ( ) . addReg ( ) . addReg ( ) . addImm ( ) ; This statement is a method call to the `MCInstBuilder` class, which is a class that builds machine code instructions. The method being called is `addImm`, which adds an immediate value to the instruction. The immediate value is represented by the `` placeholder. The `MCInstBuilder`" LLVM,RISCV,1808,"The next statement of this code snippet is: return MCInstBuilder ( ) . addReg ( ) . addReg ( ) . addImm ( ) ; Explanation: The code snippet is a part of a function that is checking if a certain feature is enabled or not. If the feature is enabled, it returns a new instance of the MCInstBuilder class with the specified string literal as an argument. If the feature is not enabled, it adds three registers and an immediate" LLVM,RISCV,1809,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it appears to be a fragment of a larger program and the context is not provided. However, based on the syntax and structure of the code, it is likely that the next statement will be another case statement or a default statement. The code snippet appears to be a switch statement, where the value of a string literal is being matched against a series of case labels. Each case label is followed by a return statement that returns a string literal. The last case label is a default case, which is indicated by the use of the keyword ""default" LLVM,RISCV,1810,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `llvm::erase_if(RepeatedSequenceLocs, CannotInsertCall);` This statement is calling the `erase_if` function from the `llvm` namespace, passing in `RepeatedSequenceLocs` as the first argument and `CannotInsertCall` as the second argument. The `erase_if` function will iterate over the elements in `RepeatedSequenceLocs` and call the `CannotInsertCall` function on each element. If the `CannotInsertCall` function returns `true`, the element" LLVM,RISCV,1811,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the context in which the code is being executed. However, based on the syntax and the fact that the `return` statement is used to return a value from a function, it is likely that the next statement after `return RI` will be the end of the function." LLVM,RISCV,1812,"The next statement of this code snippet is: return TargetFlags;" LLVM,RISCV,1813,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `using namespace II;` This statement is using the `using` keyword to bring the namespace `II` into scope for the current file. The `namespace` keyword is used to define a new namespace, and the `using` keyword is used to bring an existing namespace into scope. In this case, the `II` namespace is being brought into scope so that its contents can be accessed without having to qualify them with the namespace name." LLVM,RISCV,1814,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet without knowing the specific values of the variables and the context in which the code is being executed. However, based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the next statement will be a call to the `BuildMI` function, which is used to build a machine instruction. The `BuildMI` function takes several arguments, including a pointer to a `MachineInstr` object, which is used to represent the machine instruction being built. The `BuildMI` function is called with the `MBB`, `II`, `DL`, `TII`, and `V" LLVM,RISCV,1815,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet without knowing the specific context and variables involved. However, based on the syntax and structure of the code, it appears to be a part of a function that is building a machine instruction (MI) for a specific architecture. The function takes several parameters, including a `MBB` (machine basic block), `II` (instruction index), `DL` (data layout), `TII` (target instruction index), and `Flag` (a flag indicating whether the instruction is a branch or not). The function also uses several variables, including `VL" LLVM,RISCV,1816,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it appears to be part of a larger function and the context is not provided. However, based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the next statement may be related to the creation of a machine instruction. The code snippet defines a variable `CC` as a static cast of a string literal to a type that is not specified in the code snippet provided. It then defines a variable `CondMI` as a reference to a machine instruction that is built using the `BuildMI` function and adds two operands to the instruction using the" LLVM,RISCV,1817,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `RS->enterBasicBlockEnd(MBB);` This line of code is calling the `enterBasicBlockEnd` method of the `RS` object, which is an instance of the `RegisterScavenger` class. The `enterBasicBlockEnd` method is used to indicate that the current basic block has ended and that the scavenger should start scavenging registers for the next basic block. The `MBB` object is passed as an argument to the method, which represents the current basic block." LLVM,RISCV,1818,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be the definition of a new variable or a function call. The code snippet you provided is a part of a larger function, and it is difficult to determine the exact next statement without more context. However, based on the code you provided, it appears that the next statement could be the definition of a new variable or a function call. The code snippet you provided is a part of a larger function, and it is difficult to determine the exact next statement without more context. However, based on the code you provided, it appears that the next statement could be the definition" LLVM,RISCV,1819,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `case :` This is because the `switch` statement is checking the value of `MI.getOperand().getReg()` against the string literals ``, ``, and ``, and if none of them match, it will execute the `default` case, which is `case :`." LLVM,RISCV,1820,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific values of the variables and the behavior of the `getOperand` and `isReg` methods. However, based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the next statement will be a `return` statement that returns a boolean value indicating whether the operands of the `MI` object are registers and have the same register number." LLVM,RISCV,1821,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it appears to be a fragment of a larger program. However, based on the syntax and structure of the code, it is possible that the next statement could be: case : return isIntN(, BrOffset); This is based on the assumption that the code is using a switch statement to handle different cases, and that the next case is checking if the input is a string literal. The `isIntN` function is then called with the input and the" LLVM,RISCV,1822,"Based on the code snippet you provided, it is not possible to predict the next statement with certainty. The code is checking if the branch offset is in range for a given branch instruction. The `switch` statement is checking the value of `BranchOp` and based on that value, it is determining which case to execute. The `default` case is not reachable, so it is not possible to predict what the next statement will be. The `llvm_unreachable` function is called with a string literal as an argument, which is used to indicate that the code should not be reached" LLVM,RISCV,1823,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific inputs and the implementation of the `MI` object. However, based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the next statement will be: `return DestSourcePair { MI . getOperand ( ) , MI . getOperand ( ) } ;` This statement is inside the `case :` block, which means that it will be executed if the `MI` object's `get" LLVM,RISCV,1824,"Based on the code snippet you provided, it appears to be a part of a function that is checking the operands of a machine instruction and returning a `DestSourcePair` object if certain conditions are met. The next statement of the code snippet you provided is: ``` case : if (MI.getOperand().isReg() && MI.getOperand().isImm() && MI.getOperand().getImm() == ).getIndex();`" LLVM,RISCV,1828,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet without knowing the specific implementation of the `InstrInfo` class and the `isMBBSafeToOutlineFrom` method. However, based on the name of the method and the parameters it takes, it appears to be a method that checks whether it is safe to outline a machine basic block (MBB) from a given instruction. The method takes two parameters: a reference to a `MachineBasicBlock` object and a reference to an `unsigned` variable. It returns a `bool` value indicating whether the MBB is safe to outline." LLVM,RISCV,1829,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return !CheckFIs || any_of(MI.operands(), [](const MachineOperand &MO) { return MO.isFI(); });` This statement is the last statement in the `if` block, and it returns `true` if `CheckFIs` is `false` or if any of the operands of the `MachineInstr` `MI` is a `FI` operand." LLVM,RISCV,1830,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `if (Opcode == InstrInfo :: getRVVSpillOpcode ()) return true;` This is because the `isRVVSpill` function checks if the given machine instruction is a RISC-V vector spill instruction. The `getRVVSpillOpcode` function returns the opcode for the RISC-V vector spill instruction, and the `isRVVSpill` function checks if the opcode of the given machine instruction matches the opcode" LLVM,RISCV,1831,"It's not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific values of the string literals and the logic of the switch statement. However, based on the syntax, it appears that the code is using a switch statement to match a string literal against a series of case labels. The next statement after the switch statement would depend on the logic of the switch statement and the values of the string literals." LLVM,RISCV,1832,"It's difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet without knowing the context and the purpose of the code. However, based on the syntax and the fact that the code is using a `switch` statement, it appears to be a part of a function or method that is handling different cases based on the value of a string. The `switch` statement is used to compare a value with multiple possible values, and execute different blocks of code depending on which value matches. In this case, the `switch` statement is comparing the value of a string to multiple possible string literals. Without knowing the" LLVM,RISCV,1833,"Based on the code snippet you provided, it appears that the next statement will be: `FrameIndex = MI.getOperand().getIndex();` This is because the previous `if` statement has already been evaluated and the code has entered the `if` block. The next statement is to assign the value of `MI.getOperand().getIndex()` to the variable `FrameIndex`." LLVM,RISCV,1834,"Based on the code snippet you provided, it is difficult to predict the next statement with certainty. However, based on the context and the information provided, it appears that the next statement will be a `return` statement. The `isStoreToStackSlot` function is checking if the instruction is a store to a stack slot. The function is checking the opcode of the instruction and if it is one of the following: * `STR_LIT` * `STR_LIT` * `STR_LIT` * `STR_LIT` * `STR_" LLVM,RISCV,1835,"Based on the code snippet you provided, it appears that the next statement will be: `MachineMemOperand * MMO = MF -> getMachineMemOperand ( MachinePointerInfo :: getFixedStack ( * MF , FI ) , MachineMemOperand :: MOLoad , MemoryLocation :: UnknownSize , MFI . getObjectAlign ( FI ) ) ;` This statement is creating a new `MachineMemOperand` object and initializing it with the result of the `getMachineMemOperand` method called on the `MF` object, with the `MachinePointerInfo" LLVM,RISCV,1836,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it appears to be part of a larger function and the context is not provided. However, based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the next statement will be an `if` statement that checks the value of `IsScalableVector`. If `IsScalableVector` is true, the code will execute the block of code that follows the `if` statement, which appears to be related to handling scalable vectors. If `IsScalableVector` is false, the code will execute the `else` block, which appears to be" LLVM,RISCV,1837,"Based on the code snippet provided, it is difficult to predict the next statement with certainty. However, based on the context and the structure of the code, it is likely that the next statement will be another `if` statement or a `for` loop. The code appears to be part of a compiler or an assembler, and it is likely that the next statement will be a check for another instruction or a loop to process the next instruction in a sequence. The code is using a lot of macros and templates, so it is difficult to predict the exact next statement without knowing the specific implementation of the macros" LLVM,RISCV,1838,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet without knowing the specific values of the variables and the context in which the code is being executed. However, based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the next statement will be the first line of the for loop, which is: `for ( & Inst : Seq ) {` This line is initializing a loop that will iterate over the elements of the `Seq` vector, with each element being assigned to the `Inst` variable. The loop will continue until all elements of `Seq` have been processed." LLVM,RISCV,1839,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet without knowing the context and the specific implementation of the `parseCondBranch` function. However, based on the name of the function and the parameters it takes, it appears to be parsing a conditional branch instruction. The function takes three parameters: * `LastInst`: This is the last instruction in the basic block. * `Target`: This is a pointer to the target basic block of the conditional branch. * `Cond`: This is a vector of machine operands that represent the condition for the branch. Based on this information" LLVM,RISCV,1840,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `I = I->getNextNode();` This is because the code is iterating through a linked list of instructions, and the `getNextNode()` method is used to get the next instruction in the list. The `I` variable is a pointer to the current instruction, and the `getNextNode()` method is used to advance the pointer to the next instruction in the list." LLVM,RISCV,1841,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `I = MBB.end();`" LLVM,RISCV,1842,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the program depends on the specific values of the variables and the implementation of the `getImm()` method. However, based on the information provided, it is likely that the next statement will be a comparison between the value of `CC` and the value of the `Imm` field of the object referenced by `Cond[]`. The comparison will be performed using the `==` operator, and the result of the comparison will be stored in a variable or used as a condition for a" LLVM,RISCV,1843,"Based on the code snippet you provided, it appears to be a constructor for a class called `InstrInfo`. The constructor takes a reference to a `Subtarget` object and a `STI` object as arguments. The constructor initializes the `GenInstrInfo` base class with two string literals, and then initializes the `STI` member variable with the `STI` object passed as an argument. Therefore, the next statement of this code snippet would be the initialization of the `STI` member variable." LLVM,RISCV,1844,"Based on the code snippet you provided, it appears to be a constructor for a class called `InstrInfo`. The constructor takes a reference to a `Subtarget` object and a `STI` object as arguments. The constructor initializes the `GenInstrInfo` base class with two string literals, and then initializes the `STI` member variable with the `STI` object passed as an argument. Therefore, the next statement of this code snippet would be the initialization of the `STI` member variable." LLVM,RISCV,1845,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty because the behavior of the code depends on the specific values of the variables and the outcome of the conditional statements. However, based on the information provided, it appears that the code is checking the type of a register and setting the `Opcode` variable and `IsScalableVector` and `IsZvlsseg` flags accordingly. The code is using a series of `if` statements to check the type of the register, and each `if` statement is checking a different condition. If the condition is true, the code sets the" LLVM,RISCV,1846,"Based on the code snippet you provided, it appears to be a part of a switch statement that is checking the value of a string literal and performing different actions based on the value. The next statement in the code snippet is: `Ok = isUInt < > ( Imm ) ; break ;` This statement is checking if the value of the string literal is a valid unsigned integer, and if it is, it sets the `Ok` variable to `true`. If the value is not a valid unsigned integer, the `break` statement will exit the switch statement." LLVM,RISCV,1847,"Based on the code snippet you provided, it appears to be a switch statement that is checking the value of a string literal against a series of case labels. The case labels are all strings, and the code inside each case block is checking whether the value of the string literal is equal to the case label. Based on this information, the next statement in the code snippet would be: `case : Ok = isInt < > ( Imm ) ; break ;` This statement is checking whether the value of the string literal is equal to the" LLVM,RISCV,1848,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific values of the variables and the behavior of the functions being called. However, based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the next statement will be a call to the `BuildMI` function, passing in the `MBB`, `MBBI`, `DL`, `Opc`, and `DstReg` variables as arguments. The `BuildMI` function is likely to be a function that builds a machine instruction, and the `Opc` variable is likely to be an opcode that specifies the type" LLVM,RISCV,1849,"Based on the code snippet you provided, it appears to be a switch statement that is checking the value of a variable called `Opcode`. The `default` case is executed if the value of `Opcode` does not match any of the other cases. Inside the `default` case, there is a check to see if `MI.getParent()` and `MI.getParent()->getParent()` are both non-null. If they are, then the code retrieves some values from the `MI` object and checks if the instruction is compressible using the `isCompressibleInst()` function." LLVM,RISCV,1850,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `for (auto &C : RepeatedSequenceLocs) C.setCallInfo(MachineOutlinerDefault, CallOverhead);` This is a loop that iterates over the `RepeatedSequenceLocs` vector and sets the call information for each element using the `setCallInfo` method. The `MachineOutlinerDefault` and `CallOverhead` variables are passed as arguments to the `setCallInfo` method." LLVM,RISCV,1851,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `if (MI.isInlineAsm()) return outliner::InstrType::Illegal;` This is because the previous `if` statement was not executed, so the control flow falls through to the next `if` statement." LLVM,RISCV,1852,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `MachineInstr & MI = * BuildMI ( & MBB , DL , get ( ) ) . addMBB ( FBB ) ;` This statement creates a new `MachineInstr` object `MI` and initializes it with the result of the `BuildMI` function, which takes the current basic block `MBB`, the data layout `DL`, and the string literal `` as arguments. The `addMBB` method is then called on `MI` to add the" LLVM,RISCV,1853,"The next statement of this code snippet is: * BytesAdded += getInstSizeInBytes(MI); Explanation: The code snippet is building a machine instruction (MI) using the BuildMI function, and then adding the instruction to a basic block (MBB) using the addMBB function. The BytesAdded variable is used to keep track of the number of bytes added to the MBB so far. The getInstSizeInBytes function is used to get the size of the instruction in bytes, and the result is added to the BytesAdded variable." LLVM,RISCV,1854,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `ScratchReg = MRI.createVirtualRegister(&);` This statement creates a new virtual register using the `createVirtualRegister` method of the `MachineRegisterInfo` class, and assigns it to the `ScratchReg` variable. The `createVirtualRegister` method takes a string literal as an argument, which is used to name the new register. The `&` operator is used to pass the string literal as a pointer to the method." LLVM,RISCV,1855,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be a `return` statement, as the code is checking the operands of a machine instruction and returning a boolean value indicating whether the operands match a certain pattern. The code is checking whether the operand at index `` is a register and whether its value is equal to the string literal ``. If both conditions are true, the code will return `true`, otherwise it will return `false`. Therefore, the next statement of this code snippet is likely to be: ``` return true; ```" LLVM,RISCV,1856,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `FrameIndex = MI.getOperand().getIndex();`" LLVM,RISCV,1857,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `if (MI.getOperand().isFI() && MI.getOperand().isImm() && MI.getOperand().getImm() == ) {` This is a conditional statement that checks if the operand at index `` is a frame index (FI) and if it is an immediate value (imm) with a specific value ``. If" LLVM,RISCV,1858,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `BuildMI(MBB, I, DL, get(Opcode), DstReg).addFrameIndex(FI).addImm();` This statement is a method call to `BuildMI`, which is a method that creates a new machine instruction. The method takes several arguments, including the basic block `MBB`, the instruction `I`, the data layout `DL`, the opcode `Opcode`, and the destination register `DstReg`. The method returns a new machine instruction, which is then modified by" LLVM,RISCV,1859,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty because it appears to be a fragment of a larger program and there is not enough context to determine the values of the variables and functions being used. However, based on the syntax and structure of the code, it appears that the next statement will likely be an assignment to the `Opcode` variable, possibly using the `getRegSizeInBits` function to determine the size of a register." LLVM,RISCV,1860,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be: `MRI.createVirtualRegister(&);` This is because the previous statement, `Register SrcReg = ;`, is likely to be a declaration of a new variable `SrcReg` with the initial value ``. The next statement is likely to be an assignment to this variable, which is what `MRI.createVirtualRegister(&)` does." LLVM,RISCV,1861,"Based on the code snippet provided, it appears to be a part of a function that is handling some sort of register allocation. The function is creating a new virtual register and checking if a value is within a certain range. If the value is not within the range, it is reporting a fatal error. The next statement of the code snippet is: Result = DstReg; This statement is assigning the value of DstReg to the Result variable. It is likely that this is the final statement of the function, as it is assigning the result of the function to a register." LLVM,RISCV,1862,"This code snippet is a part of a function called `storeRegToStackSlot` in the `InstrInfo` class. It appears to be related to storing a register value to a stack slot. The code is checking if the register class `RC` has a subclass that is equal to the `STR_LIT` class, and if so, it is setting the `Opcode` variable to a specific value. It is also checking if the `RC` class has a subclass that is equal to the `STR_LIT` class, and if so, it is setting the `Opcode`" LLVM,RISCV,1863,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be the execution of the `MachineInstrBuilder` object `MIB`. The `MIB` object is created by calling the `BuildMI` function with various parameters, and then several methods are called on it to add operands to the machine instruction being built. It's difficult to say exactly what the next statement will be without knowing more about the context in which this code is being executed, but it's likely that the `MIB` object will be used to generate a machine instruction that performs a wide operation (such as a multiply or divide)" LLVM,RISCV,1864,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `unsigned NewOpc;` This line declares a new variable `NewOpc` of type `unsigned`, which will be used to store the new opcode for the converted instruction." LLVM,RISCV,1865,"Based on the code snippet provided, it is difficult to predict the next statement with certainty. However, based on the context and the patterns in the code, it is likely that the next statement will be a call to the `BuildMI` function, passing in the `MBB`, `MBBI`, `DL`, and `Result` variables as arguments. The `BuildMI` function is likely to be a member function of the `MachineFunction` class, and it is used to build a machine instruction. The `Result` variable is likely to be the destination register for the instruction, and the `Inst` variable is" LLVM,RISCV,1866,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet without knowing the context and the specific values of the variables used in the code. However, based on the syntax and the structure of the code, it appears to be a part of a function that is building a machine instruction. The function is called `BuildMI` and it takes several parameters, including `MBB`, `MBBI`, `DL`, `Result`, and `Flag`. The function appears to be building a machine instruction using the `MBB` and `MBBI` parameters, and it is also adding a register or immediate value to the instruction" LLVM,RISCV,1867,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `ErrInfo = ;` This statement assigns a string literal to the `ErrInfo` variable. The exact value of the string literal is not specified in the code snippet, but it is likely to be a descriptive error message." LLVM,RISCV,1868,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `if ( !Ok ) { ErrInfo = ; return false ; }` This statement checks if the `Ok` variable is not set to `true`, and if it's not, it sets the `ErrInfo` variable to a string literal and returns `false`." LLVM,RISCV,1869,"The next statement after the `return` statement in the code snippet is the closing brace `}`, which indicates the end of the function." LLVM,RISCV,1870,"The next statement after the `return` statement in the code snippet is the closing brace `}`, which indicates the end of the function." LLVM,RISCV,1871,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `MIB.copyImplicitOps(MI);` This line of code copies the implicit operands of the original machine instruction `MI` to the new machine instruction being built by `MIB`. The `copyImplicitOps` method is called on `MIB` and passed `MI` as an argument, which causes the implicit operands of `MI` to be copied to `MIB`." LLVM,RISCV,1872,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be a call to the `replaceKillInstruction` method of the `LIS` object, passing in the register and the new instruction as arguments. The purpose of this method is to replace the kill instruction for the register with the new instruction. The code snippet is part of a larger function that is building a new instruction and adding it to a basic block. The `MachineInstrBuilder` object is used to build the new instruction, and the `MachineOperand` objects are used to represent the operands of the instruction. The `LV` and" LLVM,RISCV,1873,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be: `MBB.insert(new IndirectBranchInst(DestBB, RestoreBB, DL, BrOffset, RS));` This is because the code snippet is setting up the parameters for an indirect branch instruction, which is typically used to implement a jump table or a computed goto. The `MBB` object is a machine basic block, and the `insert` method is used to add instructions to the basic block. The `IndirectBranchInst` constructor takes the destination basic block, the restore basic block, the" LLVM,RISCV,1874,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `if ( MBBI -> getNumDefs ( ) ) {` This is because the previous `if` statement was not taken, and the `else` clause is being executed. The `else` clause checks if the current instruction has any definitions, and if so, it executes the code inside the `if` statement." LLVM,RISCV,1875,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `ScratchReg = MRI.createVirtualRegister(&);` This statement creates a new virtual register in the machine register info (MRI) and assigns it to the `ScratchReg` variable. The `createVirtualRegister` method takes a string literal as an argument, which is used to name the new register. The `&` operator is used to pass the address of the string literal to the method." LLVM,RISCV,1876,"This code snippet appears to be part of a compiler or assembler that is generating machine code for a specific instruction set architecture (ISA). The code is using the LLVM library to generate machine code. The code is creating a new virtual register and using it to store the result of a ""lui"" instruction, which is a load upper immediate instruction that loads a constant value into a register. The constant value is specified by the ""BrOffset"" variable, which is assumed to be a 32-bit integer. The code is also checking if the target machine is position-independent or if the" LLVM,RISCV,1877,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty because the behavior of the `llvm_unreachable` function is not specified. However, based on the name of the function, it is likely that it will cause the program to terminate or abort if the `if` statement is not true. Therefore, the next statement of this code snippet is likely to be the `llvm_unreachable` function call." LLVM,RISCV,1878,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be: `BuildMI(MBB, I, DL, get(Opcode), DstReg).addFrameIndex(FI).addImm();` This is because the previous line of code ends with a semicolon, indicating that it is a complete statement. The next line of code starts with `BuildMI`, which is a function call that takes several arguments, including `MBB`, `I`, `DL`, `get(Opcode)`, `DstReg`, `FI`, and `` and that `` is not empty. The function then calls a function called `BuildMI` with the parameters `MBB`," LLVM,RISCV,1882,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be a call to the `contains` method of the `STR_LIT` object, passing in the `DstReg` and `SrcReg` variables as arguments. The purpose of this call is to check if the `DstReg` and `SrcReg` registers are contained within the `STR_LIT` object. If they are not, the `assert` statement will fail and the program will terminate with an error message." LLVM,RISCV,1883,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return getInlineAsmLength(MI.getOperand().getSymbolName(), *TM.getMCAsmInfo());` This statement is inside the `case TargetOpcode::INLINEASM` block, and it is executed when the `TargetOpcode` is `INLINEASM`. The statement returns the length of the inline assembly code, which is obtained by calling the `getInlineAsmLength` function with the symbol name of the inline assembly code and the `MCAsmInfo" LLVM,RISCV,1884,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific values of the variables and the behavior of the functions being called. However, based on the code snippet you provided, it appears that the next statement will be a call to the `getInlineAsmLength` function, which is defined in the `llvm::MCAsmInfo` class. The `getInlineAsmLength` function takes two arguments: a string representing the inline assembly code, and a pointer to an `llvm::MCAsmInfo` object. The function returns the" LLVM,RISCV,1885,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet without knowing the context in which it is being executed. The code appears to be part of a larger program that is manipulating machine code instructions, but without more information, it is not possible to determine the exact behavior of this function. The function `loadRegFromStackSlot` appears to be loading a value from a stack slot into a register, but the specific details of how this is done are not clear from the code snippet provided. The function takes several parameters, including a reference to a `MachineBasicBlock` object, an iterator `I` that" LLVM,RISCV,1886,"The next statement after the `if` statement would be the assignment of the `DL` variable to the result of the `getDebugLoc()` method called on the `I` variable. So, the next statement would be: `DL = I->getDebugLoc();`" LLVM,RISCV,1887,"Based on the code snippet you provided, it appears to be a part of a function that returns the size of an instruction in bytes. The function takes a `MachineInstr` object as an argument and uses the `getOpcode()` method to retrieve the opcode of the instruction. The function then uses a switch statement to determine the size of the instruction based on its opcode. The `get()` method is used to retrieve the size of the instruction for each opcode. The next statement of the code snippet would be the `return` statement, which returns the size of the instruction in bytes." LLVM,RISCV,1888,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `MachineBasicBlock` and `MachineFunction` classes, as well as the input data. However, based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the next statement will be: `MachineBasicBlock * MBB = I->getParent();` This statement retrieves the `MachineBasicBlock` object that contains the current instruction `I`. The `getParent()` method is called on the `MachineBasicBlock` object to retrieve the parent `MachineFunction` object, which is then" LLVM,RISCV,1889,"Based on the code snippet you provided, it appears to be a part of a larger program that is generating machine code for a specific architecture. The code is using a number of variables and functions that are not defined in the snippet, so it is difficult to provide a definitive answer to your question. That being said, based on the information provided, it is possible that the next statement of the code snippet will be a call to the `getRegSizeInBits` function, passing in the `RC` variable as an argument. This function is not defined in the snippet, so it is not possible to determine what" LLVM,RISCV,1890,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return DstReg > SrcReg && ( DstReg - SrcReg ) < NumRegs;` This statement is a boolean expression that checks whether the destination register `DstReg` is greater than the source register `SrcReg`, and whether the difference between the two registers is less than the number of registers `NumRegs`. If both conditions are true, the function returns `true`, otherwise it returns `false`." LLVM,RISCV,1891,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return DstReg > SrcReg && ( DstReg - SrcReg ) < NumRegs;` This statement is a boolean expression that checks if the destination register `DstReg` is greater than the source register `SrcReg`, and if the difference between the two registers is less than the number of registers `NumRegs`. If both conditions are true, the statement returns `true`, otherwise it returns `false`." LLVM,RISCV,1892,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return TargetInstrInfo :: commuteInstructionImpl ( WorkingMI , false , OpIdx1 , OpIdx2 ) ;` This statement is executed when the `OpIdx1` or `OpIdx2` is equal to ``, which is a constant value. The `commuteInstructionImpl` function is called with the `WorkingMI` object, which is a clone of the original `MI` object, and the `false` value for the `IsCommutative` parameter. The" LLVM,RISCV,1893,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `BuildMI(MBB, II, DL, TII->get(), ScaledRegister).addReg(VL).addImm(ShiftAmount);` This statement creates a new machine instruction (MI) using the `BuildMI` function, which takes the basic block (MBB), the instruction info (II), the data layout (DL), the target-specific instruction info (TII), and the virtual register (ScaledRegister) as arguments. The `addReg` method is used to add the virtual" LLVM,RISCV,1894,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet without knowing the context and the values of the variables used in the code. However, based on the code snippet provided, it appears to be a loop that iterates over a sequence of instructions, and for each instruction, it performs some operations based on the instruction's opcode and immediate value. The loop starts by initializing a few variables, including `Num`, which is set to 0, and `Result`, which is set to `DstReg`. It then iterates over the sequence of instructions, and for each instruction, it checks if the" LLVM,RISCV,1895,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `case CASE_VFMA_OPCODE_LMULS_MF4 ( FMADD , VV ) :` This is a case statement that checks if the opcode of the instruction is `FMADD` and the operands are `VV`. If this is the case, the code inside the case statement will be executed." LLVM,RISCV,1896,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `SlotIndex Idx = LIS->ReplaceMachineInstrInMaps(MI, *MIB);` This statement replaces the machine instruction `MI` in the maps of the `LIS` object, and returns the `SlotIndex` of the replaced instruction. The `SlotIndex` is then used to check if the instruction has an early clobber operand, and if so, to update the live interval of the operand." LLVM,RISCV,1897,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return get(Opcode).getSize();` This is because the `if` statement is checking if the `MI` object has a parent and if that parent has a parent. If this condition is true, then the code inside the `if` block is executed, which includes a call to the `isCompressibleInst` function. If this function returns `true`, then the code inside the `if` block is executed, which includes a call to the `get` function with the `Opcode` parameter. If the `if`" LLVM,RISCV,1898,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `MBB.insertBranchInstruction(MBB.getTerminator(), DestBB, RestoreBB, DL, BrOffset, RS);` This is because the `insertIndirectBranch` method is being called on the `MBB` object, which is a `MachineBasicBlock` object. The method takes several parameters, including the `DestBB` and `RestoreBB` objects, which are also `MachineBasicBlock` objects. The method also takes a `DebugLoc` object, which is used to specify the" LLVM,RISCV,1899,"The next statement after the code snippet you provided is: It = MBB.insert(It, BuildMI(MF, DebugLoc(), get(), ).addGlobalAddress(M.getNamedValue(MF.getName()), , )); This statement is adding a new instruction to the basic block (MBB) at the current iterator position (It). The instruction is a call to the BuildMI function, which is used to create a new machine instruction. The BuildMI function takes several" LLVM,RISCV,1900,"The next statement after the code snippet you provided is: It = MBB.insert(It, BuildMI(MF, DebugLoc(), get(), ).addGlobalAddress(M.getNamedValue(MF.getName()), , )); This statement is adding a new instruction to the basic block (MBB) at the current iterator position (It). The instruction is a call to the BuildMI function, which is used to create a new machine instruction. The BuildMI function takes several" LLVM,RISCV,1901,"Based on the code snippet provided, it is difficult to predict the next statement with certainty. However, based on the context of the code, it appears that the next statement will be a continuation of the while loop. The code is checking the opcode of each instruction in the basic block, and if it is a certain opcode (e.g. ""vsetvli""), it will check if the instruction is a definition of a vector register. If it is a definition, it will check if the register is the same as the one specified in the code snippet (i.e. ""v0"")." LLVM,RISCV,1902,The next statement after the `if` statement is the `return` statement. The `return` statement will return a `DestSourcePair` object with the two operands of the `MI` object as its members. LLVM,RISCV,1903,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet without knowing the context and the values of the variables used in the code. However, based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the code is iterating over a sequence of instructions (represented by the variable `Inst`) and performing some operations based on the opcode of each instruction. The code snippet is using a `for` loop to iterate over the sequence of instructions, and within the loop, it is checking the opcode of each instruction using the `Inst.Opc` field. Depending on the opcode, the code is performing different" LLVM,RISCV,1904,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `BuildMI(MBB, MBBI, DL, get(Inst.Opc), DstReg).addReg(SrcReg, RegState::Kill).addReg(SrcReg, RegState::Kill).setMIFlag(Flag);` This statement is a method call to `BuildMI`, which is a function that creates a new instance of a class called `MI`. The `BuildMI` function takes several arguments, including `MBB`, `MBBI`, `DL`, `get(Inst.Opc)`," LLVM,RISCV,1905,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `if (UseVMV_V_I) {`" LLVM,RISCV,1906,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `unsigned Log2SEW = MI.getOperand(OpIdx).getImm();`" LLVM,RISCV,1907,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return outliner::InstrType::Illegal;` This is because the code checks various conditions on the instruction `MI` and returns `outliner::InstrType::Illegal` if any of the conditions are true. If none of the conditions are true, the code will continue to the next statement, which is not shown in the snippet." LLVM,RISCV,1908,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return outliner::InstrType::Illegal;` This is because the `if` statement that precedes it checks if the instruction modifies a specific register or has an implicit definition of a physical register, and if so, it returns `outliner::InstrType::Illegal`. If the instruction does not modify the register or have an implicit definition, then the `for` loop is executed, which checks if any of the operands are a basic block, a block address, a constant pool index, or a jump table index. If" LLVM,RISCV,1909,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet without knowing the specific values of the variables and the behavior of the functions being called. However, based on the code structure and the context, it appears that the code is generating machine instructions for a virtual machine or emulator. The code is checking if the number of virtual registers (NumOfVReg) is a power of 2, and if so, it is generating a scaled register and a shift amount. If the number of virtual registers is not a power of 2, it is generating a different set of instructions. The next statement of the" LLVM,RISCV,1910,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet without knowing the specific values of the variables and the implementation of the functions being called. However, based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the next statement will be a call to the `BuildMI` function with the `MBB`, `II`, `DL`, and `VL` parameters. The `BuildMI` function appears to be building a machine instruction, and the `VL` parameter is likely a virtual register that is being used as the destination operand for the instruction. The `Flag` parameter is also being passed to `BuildMI`," LLVM,RISCV,1911,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `BuildMI(MBB, MBBI, DL, get(Inst.Opc), DstReg).addImm(Inst.Imm).setMIFlag(Flag);`" LLVM,RISCV,1912,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific values of the variables and the behavior of the `BuildMI` function. However, based on the code snippet, it appears that the next statement will be: `BuildMI(MBB, MBBI, DL, get(Inst.Opc), DstReg).addReg(SrcReg, RegState::Kill).addReg(SrcReg, RegState::Kill).setMIFlag(Flag);` This is because the `switch` statement is checking the value" LLVM,RISCV,1913,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet without knowing the specific implementation of the `InstrInfo` class and the `MachineFunction` class. However, based on the name of the method and the parameters it takes, it appears that this method is checking whether a particular instruction should be outlined from a function by default. The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be a check of some kind, such as a check of the instruction's type or a check of the function's properties. The method may also use information from the `MachineFunction` object to make its decision. Without" LLVM,RISCV,1914,"Based on the code snippet you provided, it appears to be part of a larger function that is generating machine code for a specific instruction. The code is checking the operands of the instruction to determine the correct opcode and whether the instruction is a vector instruction. Based on the information provided, it is difficult to predict the next statement of the code with certainty. However, based on the patterns in the code, it is likely that the next statement will be another `else if` statement that checks for a different condition related to the instruction operands. It is also possible that the next statement will be a" LLVM,RISCV,1915,"Based on the code snippet you provided, it appears to be related to the generation of machine code for a specific instruction set architecture (ISA). The code is checking the type of instruction and determining the appropriate opcode to use based on the instruction's operands and the ISA. The next statement of the code snippet is likely to be a case statement or a series of if-else statements that determine the opcode based on the specific instruction and its operands. The opcode is a unique identifier for each instruction in the ISA, and it is used to generate the machine code for the instruction." LLVM,RISCV,1916,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be: `Opc = ;` This is because the code is checking the contents of the `DstReg` and `SrcReg` registers using the `contains` method, and if they contain a certain value, it sets the `Opc` variable to a specific string literal. The code then checks the value of `Opc` and sets the `IsScalableVector` variable to `false` if `Opc` contains a certain value. It's worth noting that the code snippet you" LLVM,RISCV,1917,"Based on the code snippet provided, it seems that the `getAsIntImmediate` function is trying to extract an integer immediate value from a `MachineOperand` object. The function first checks if the operand is an immediate value, and if so, returns the immediate value. If the operand is a register, the function gets the register number and checks if it is a virtual register. If it is, the function gets the definition of the virtual register and checks the opcode of the definition. If the opcode is one of the specified values, the function returns the immediate value associated with the definition. Otherwise," LLVM,RISCV,1918,"Based on the code snippet you provided, it appears to be a part of a function that returns a value based on the value of a register and the operation code of a definition. However, without more context, it is difficult to predict the next statement with certainty. The code snippet is checking if the register `Reg` is a specific string literal, and if it is, it returns a specific number literal. If the register is not a string literal, it checks if the register is virtual and if it has a unique definition. If it does, it gets the operation code of the definition and switches on it." LLVM,RISCV,1919,"This code snippet appears to be a list of instructions for a computer program. The instructions are represented as a series of tuples, where each tuple contains a mnemonic (such as ""MO_CALL"") and a string literal (such as """"). It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet without knowing the context in which it is being executed. The instructions in the snippet could be part of a larger program, and the next statement would depend on the control flow of the program. If you provide more context or information about the program, I may be able" LLVM,RISCV,1920,"Based on the code snippet you provided, it appears to be a C++ code that defines a function called `getSerializableDirectMachineOperandTargetFlags` that returns an array of `std::pair` objects. The function is defined within a class called `InstrInfo` and is marked as `const`, meaning it does not modify any member variables of the class. The function appears to be related to the ISA (Instruction Set Architecture) of a processor, specifically the (which is not specified in the code snippet you provided). The function returns an array of `std" LLVM,RISCV,1921,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `MachineInstr & MI = * BuildMI (&MBB, DL, get(PseudoOpcode)).addMBB(TBB);` This statement creates a new `MachineInstr` object `MI` and initializes it with the result of calling the `BuildMI` function with the current `MachineBasicBlock` `MBB`, the current `DataLayout` `DL`, and the `PseudoOpcode` that was determined earlier in the code snippet. The `addMBB` method is then called on the" LLVM,RISCV,1922,"Based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the next statement will be: `PseudoOpcode = ;` This is because the previous `if` statement sets `PseudoOpcode` to `` if a certain condition is met, and the `else` clause sets it to `` if the condition is not met. Therefore, regardless of the outcome of the `if` statement, `PseudoOpcode` will be set to ``." LLVM,RISCV,1923,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific inputs and the behavior of the functions being called. However, based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the next statement will be the assignment of a value to the variable `Scav`. The code snippet is using the `scavengeRegisterBackwards` function to find a register that can be used to replace the `ScratchReg` register, which is a virtual register. The `scavengeRegisterBackwards` function takes a register class, a machine instruction iterator, a boolean value indicating" LLVM,RISCV,1924,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific values of the variables and the behavior of the `MI` object. However, based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the next statement will be a `return` statement, as all of the previous `case` statements have a `return` statement. It is also worth noting that the code snippet appears to be part of a switch statement, and the `case` statements are checking the value of a variable (represented by ``) and returning a boolean value" LLVM,RISCV,1925,"Based on the code snippet you provided, it appears that the next statement will be: case : return MI.getOperand().isReg() && MI.getOperand().getReg() == MI.getOperand().getReg(); This is based on the pattern of the previous cases, where each case checks the operand at a specific index () and performs a specific check on it. The next case appears to be" LLVM,RISCV,1926,"Based on the code snippet you provided, it seems like the next statement after the `default` case would be `llvm_unreachable("""");`. The `llvm_unreachable` function is a macro that is used to indicate that a particular code path is unreachable, and it is typically used in switch statements to handle the default case when all other cases have been exhausted. In this case, the `default` case is not exhaustive, so it is possible that the code could continue executing after the `llvm_unreachable`" LLVM,RISCV,1927,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the value returned by the `MI.getOpcode()` method. However, based on the code snippet, it appears that the `MI` object is an instance of a class that has a `getOpcode()` method, and the `switch` statement is checking the value returned by this method. The `switch` statement is checking the value returned by `MI.getOpcode()` against a series of string literals, and if the value matches one of the string literals, it will return a specific" LLVM,RISCV,1928,"The next statement after the given code snippet is: `return true;`" LLVM,RISCV,1929,"Based on the code snippet you provided, it appears to be a part of a function called `isStoreToStackSlot` that is checking the opcode of a `MachineInstr` object to determine if it is a store to a stack slot. The function is returning a value of type `unsigned` and is taking two parameters: a `const MachineInstr&` reference to the instruction, and an `int&` reference to a frame index. The function is using a `switch` statement to check the opcode of the instruction, and it is returning a value of `).getImm()` This is because the code is checking if the operand at index `` is a FI (first immediate) and if it is an immediate value, and if so, it is getting the immediate value" LLVM,RISCV,1931,"Based on the code snippet you provided, it appears that the next statement will be: `Opcode = ;` This is because the previous `if` statement has already been evaluated, and the `else` block is being executed. The `else` block sets the `Opcode` variable to ``." LLVM,RISCV,1932,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be the initialization of the `STI` member variable, which is a reference to the `Subtarget` object passed as an argument to the constructor. The code snippet is initializing the `STI` member variable by calling the `getTargetABI()` method on the `Subtarget` object, which returns a string representing the target ABI. The `STI` member variable is then initialized with this string. Therefore, the next statement of this code snippet is likely to be: ``` STI = STI.getTargetAB" LLVM,RISCV,1933,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be the initialization of the `STI` member variable, which is a reference to the `Subtarget` object passed as an argument to the constructor. The code snippet is initializing the `STI` member variable by calling the `getTargetABI()` method on the `Subtarget` object, which returns a string representing the target ABI. The `STI` member variable is then initialized with this string. Therefore, the next statement of this code snippet is likely to be: ``` STI = STI.getTargetAB" LLVM,RISCV,1934,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `MachineMemOperand *MMO = MF->getMachineMemOperand(MachinePointerInfo::getFixedStack(*MF, FI), MachineMemOperand::MOStore, MFI.getObjectSize(FI), MFI.getObjectAlign(FI));`" LLVM,RISCV,1935,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty because it is dependent on the specific values of the variables and the behavior of the functions being called. However, based on the code snippet, it appears that the next statement will be a conditional statement that checks the value of `IsZvlsseg` and performs a different action based on that value." LLVM,RISCV,1936,"Based on the code snippet you provided, it appears to be a part of a function that is determining the size of an instruction based on its opcode. The function is using a `switch` statement to handle different opcodes, and it is returning a value of `` for certain opcodes. The next statement in the code snippet is `case :`, which suggests that the function is handling a specific opcode that is represented by a string literal. The function is then returning a value of `` for this opcode. Without" LLVM,RISCV,1937,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return false;`" LLVM,RISCV,1938,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `if ( NumTerminators > ) return true ;` This statement checks if the number of terminators in the current basic block is greater than a certain value (represented by ``). If it is, the function returns `true`. Otherwise, the function continues to execute the next statement." LLVM,RISCV,1939,"Based on the code snippet you provided, it seems like the next statement after the `case :` statement would be another `case :` statement. However, without more context it's difficult to say for sure. Can you provide more information about the code snippet or the program you're working with?" LLVM,RISCV,1940,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `Cond[].setImm(getOppositeBranchOpcode(Cond[].getImm()));` This statement is setting the immediate value of the instruction at index `` in the `Cond` array to the opposite branch opcode of the current instruction. The `getOppositeBranchOpcode` function is called with the current immediate value of the instruction as an argument, and the result of this function is used as the new immediate value." LLVM,RISCV,1941,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the code depends on the specific values of the variables and the implementation of the `Cond` class. However, based on the code snippet, it appears that the code is trying to set the immediate value of a condition to the opposite of its current value. The `Cond` class appears to have a method called `getImm` that returns the immediate value of the condition, and a method called `setImm` that sets the immediate value of the condition. The code snippet first calls `getImm`" LLVM,RISCV,1942,"Based on the code snippet you provided, it appears to be a switch statement that is checking the value of a string literal and performing different actions based on the value. The next statement after the code snippet you provided would be the default case, which is not shown in the code snippet. The default case would be executed if none of the other cases match the value of the string literal. Without seeing the rest of the code, it is not possible to determine exactly what the default case would do. However, it is likely that the default case would handle any unexpected or unsupported values of the string literal." LLVM,RISCV,1943,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `I->removeFromParent();`" LLVM,RISCV,1944,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific values of the variables and the behavior of the functions being called. However, based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the next statement will be: `Opc = ;` This is because the `if` statement that precedes this line checks whether the `DstReg` and `SrcReg` variables contain certain values, and if they do, it sets the `Opc` variable to a specific string literal. If the `if` statement is not" LLVM,RISCV,1945,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty because it depends on the specific values of the variables and the behavior of the functions being called. However, we can make some educated guesses based on the information provided. The code snippet appears to be part of a function that is copying a physical register. The function takes several parameters, including a machine basic block, an iterator for the basic block, a debug location, a destination register, a source register, and a boolean indicating whether the source register should be killed. The function first checks if the destination and source registers are the same" LLVM,RISCV,1946,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return get(Opcode).getSize();` Explanation: The code snippet is a switch statement that returns a value based on the value of `Opcode`. The next statement after the switch statement is the `return` statement, which returns the result of the `get` method called on `Opcode` and the `getSize` method called on the result of the `get` method." LLVM,RISCV,1947,"Based on the code snippet you provided, it appears to be part of a switch statement that is checking the opcode of a machine instruction and returning a value based on the operands of the instruction. The next statement in the code snippet is: `FrameIndex = MI.getOperand().getIndex();` This statement is assigning the value of the `getIndex()` method of the `MI.getOperand()` object to the `FrameIndex` variable. The `getIndex()` method is likely returning an integer value that" LLVM,RISCV,1948,"Based on the code snippet you provided, it appears to be a part of a function that is checking if a machine instruction is a load from a stack slot. The function is returning a boolean value indicating whether the instruction is a load from a stack slot or not. The function takes two arguments: * `MI`: a reference to a `MachineInstr` object, which represents a machine instruction. * `FrameIndex`: a reference to an integer that will be set to the index of the stack slot if the instruction is a load from a stack slot. The function first checks the opcode of" LLVM,RISCV,1949,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return ;` The code snippet is a part of a function that appears to be handling memory accesses. The function is checking the operands of a machine instruction (represented by `MI`) to see if they are memory references, and if so, it is returning the register and frame index associated with the memory reference. If the operand is not a memory reference, the function is returning a default value (``)." LLVM,RISCV,1950,"Based on the code snippet you provided, it appears that the next statement will be: `return MI.getOperand().getReg();` This is because the previous `if` statement checks if the operand is a frame index and if it is, it returns the register associated with that frame index. If the operand is not a frame index, the `else if` statement checks if the operand is an immediate value and if it is equal to a specific value. If the operand is an immediate value and it is equal to the specific value, the `" LLVM,RISCV,1951,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty because it depends on the specific values of the variables and the behavior of the functions called. However, we can make some educated guesses based on the information provided. The code snippet appears to be part of a compiler or interpreter for a programming language. It is checking the type of a value and performing different actions depending on the type. The `hasSubClassEq` function appears to be checking whether a value has a certain type or subtype. The first `if` statement checks whether the value has a subtype equal to `" LLVM,RISCV,1952,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be: `BuildMI(MBB, I, DL, get(), DstReg).addFrameIndex(FI).addImm();` This is because the `if` statement checks if `I` is not equal to `MBB.end()`, and if it is not, it executes the code inside the `if` block. The code inside the `if` block is the `BuildMI` function call, which is likely to be the next statement in the code snippet" LLVM,RISCV,1953,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific inputs and the behavior of the `BuildMI` function. However, based on the code snippet, it appears that the next statement will be a call to the `addFrameIndex` method on the object returned by `BuildMI`. This is because the code snippet checks if `RC` is equal to a specific string literal, and if it is, it calls `BuildMI` with a series of arguments, including `FI` as the second argument. If `RC` is not equal to the specific string literal," LLVM,RISCV,1954,"The next statement after the `if` statement would be the assignment of the `DL` variable to the result of the `getDebugLoc()` method called on the `I` variable. So, the next statement would be: `DL = I->getDebugLoc();`" LLVM,RISCV,1955,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `InstrInfo` class and the `storeRegToStackSlot` method. However, based on the name of the method and the parameters it takes, it is likely that the next statement will involve storing the value of a register to a stack slot. The `storeRegToStackSlot` method is likely to be a member function of the `InstrInfo` class, which is a class that provides information about instructions in a machine code program. The method takes several parameters," LLVM,RISCV,1956,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `case TargetOpcode::INLINEASM_BR: {` This is because the previous `case` statement was `TargetOpcode::INLINEASM`, and the next `case` statement after that is `TargetOpcode::INLINEASM_BR`." LLVM,RISCV,1957,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return getInlineAsmLength(MI.getOperand().getSymbolName(), *TM.getMCAsmInfo());` This statement is a return statement that returns the result of the `getInlineAsmLength` function, which is called with two arguments: the symbol name of the operand at index `` of the `MachineInstr` object `MI`, and the `MCAsmInfo` object obtained by calling `getMCAsmInfo` on the `Target" LLVM,RISCV,1958,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it appears to be a fragment of a larger program and the context is not provided. However, based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the next statement may be a call to the `enterBasicBlockEnd` method of the `RS` object, passing in the `MBB` object as an argument. The `enterBasicBlockEnd` method is not defined in the code snippet provided, so it is not possible to determine its exact behavior. However, based on the name of the method, it appears to be related to" LLVM,RISCV,1959,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `Register N = MRI.createVirtualRegister(&);`" LLVM,RISCV,1960,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `BuildMI(MBB, II, DL, TII->get(), N).addReg().addImm(NumOfVReg);` This statement creates a new virtual register `N` using `MRI.createVirtualRegister` and then builds a new machine instruction using `BuildMI`. The instruction is a `addReg` instruction, which adds the value of the register `N` to the value of the register ``. The value of `N" LLVM,RISCV,1961,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific values of the variables and the implementation of the `LdSt` class. However, based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the next statement will be: `return true;` This is because the previous statements in the code snippet have been executed successfully, and the `return` statement is the next logical step in the code. The `return` statement will return a value of `true` to indicate that the `LdSt` operation was successful." LLVM,RISCV,1962,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `Width = ( * LdSt . memoperands_begin ( ) ) -> getSize ( ) ;` This statement assigns the size of the memory operand to the `Width` variable." LLVM,RISCV,1963,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it appears to be part of a larger program and the context is not provided. However, based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the next statement will be an if statement that checks if IsScalableVector is true. If it is true, then the code will execute the block of code inside the if statement, which appears to be related to handling a scalable vector. If IsScalableVector is false, then the code will execute the block of code outside the if statement, which appears to be related to handling a non-scal" LLVM,RISCV,1964,"Based on the code snippet you provided, it appears to be a part of a function that is checking the type of a value and setting the `Opcode` and `IsScalableVector` variables accordingly. The `hasSubClassEq` method is being used to check if the value has a certain type, and the `Opcode` and `IsScalableVector` variables are being set based on the result of that check. Without knowing the specific types and values being checked, it's difficult to say exactly what the next statement will be. However, based on the pattern of the code," LLVM,RISCV,1965,"The next statement of this code snippet is: BuildMI(MBB, MBBI, DL, get(), DstReg) Explanation: The code snippet is a part of a function named ""copyPhysReg"" that is defined in a class named ""InstrInfo"". The function takes several parameters, including ""MBB"" and ""MBBI"", which are iterators for a machine basic block, and ""DL"", which is a debug location. The function also takes ""DstReg"" and ""SrcReg"", which are unsigned integers representing" LLVM,RISCV,1966,"The code snippet you provided is a C++ code that is checking if a string literal has a certain sub-class equivalence. The `hasSubClassEq` function is being called on the string literal with the `RC` parameter, which is likely a reference to a class or object that is being used to check the sub-class equivalence. If the `hasSubClassEq` function returns true, then the `Opcode` variable is being set to a new string literal. Otherwise, if the `hasSubClassEq` function returns false, the `llvm_unreachable` function is being called" LLVM,RISCV,1967,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `BuildMI(MBB, I, DL, get(Opcode), DstReg).addFrameIndex(FI).addImm();` This is a method call to `BuildMI`, which is a method that creates a new machine instruction. The method takes several arguments, including `MBB`, `I`, `DL`, `Opcode`, `DstReg`, `FI`, and ``. The method returns a new machine instruction, which is then added to the basic block `MB" LLVM,RISCV,1968,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `Opcode = ;` This is because the `if` statement checks if `.hasSubClassEq(RC)` is true, and if it is, it sets `Opcode` to ``. If the condition is not true, it checks if `.hasSubClassEq(RC)` is true again, and if it is, it sets `Opcode` to ``. If both conditions are false, it calls `llvm_" LLVM,RISCV,1969,"Based on the code snippet you provided, it appears to be a part of a function that is building a machine instruction. The function is checking the opcode of the instruction and setting it to a specific value based on the result of the `hasSubClassEq` method called on a string literal. The next statement in the code snippet is `BuildMI(MBB, I, DL, get(Opcode), DstReg).addFrameIndex(FI).addImm();`. This statement is calling the `BuildMI` function with the following arguments:" LLVM,RISCV,1970,"Based on the code snippet you provided, it appears to be a part of a larger program that is checking the subclass of a string literal and assigning a value to the `Opcode` variable based on the result. The next statement in the code snippet is: `else if ( . hasSubClassEq ( RC ) ) Opcode = ;` This statement is checking if the string literal has a subclass equal to `RC`, and if it does, it is assigning the value of the string literal to the `Opcode` variable." LLVM,RISCV,1971,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it appears to be part of a larger function and the context is not provided. However, based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the next statement will be: `BuildMI(MBB, MBBI, DL, get(Inst.Opc), Result).addReg(SrcReg, RegState::Kill).addImm(Inst.Imm).setMIFlag(Flag);` This is because the code snippet ends with an `else` block that is executed if the instruction opcode" LLVM,RISCV,1972,"Based on the code snippet provided, it appears to be a part of a function that is processing a sequence of instructions. The function is checking if the current instruction is the last one in the sequence and if it is, it sets the `Result` variable to `DstReg`. If the current instruction is not the last one, it builds a machine instruction using the `BuildMI` function and adds an immediate value to it. The next statement of the code snippet is likely to be the start of a new iteration of the loop, where the function will process the next instruction in the sequence." LLVM,RISCV,1973,"This code snippet appears to be part of a switch statement that is handling different types of opcodes in a compiler. The `case` statements are checking the opcode type and returning a value based on that type. The next statement in the code snippet is: ``` case TargetOpcode::INLINEASM: ``` This statement is checking if the opcode is of type `INLINEASM`. If it is, then the code inside the `case` statement will be executed." LLVM,RISCV,1974,"Based on the code snippet you provided, it appears to be part of a switch statement that is handling different opcodes in a machine instruction. The next statement is likely to be a case statement for the next opcode. Here is a breakdown of the code snippet: * The code is part of a switch statement that is handling different opcodes in a machine instruction. * The switch statement is using the `TargetOpcode` enum to define the different opcodes. * The code is currently handling the `EH_LABEL`, `IMPLICIT_DEF`, `KILL`, `" LLVM,RISCV,1975,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return DestSourcePair { MI . getOperand ( ) , MI . getOperand ( ) } ;` This statement is executed when the `case` statement matches the `` token, and it returns a `DestSourcePair` object with the operands of the `MI` object as its members." LLVM,RISCV,1976,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return DestSourcePair { MI . getOperand ( ) , MI . getOperand ( ) } ;` This statement is executed when the `case` statement matches the `` token, and it returns a `DestSourcePair` object with the operands of the `MI` object as its members." LLVM,RISCV,1977,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `FBB = ;` This is because the `while` loop has ended, and the next statement after the loop is the assignment of `FBB` to ``." LLVM,RISCV,1978,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `Cond.push_back(MachineOperand::CreateImm(ThisCond[].getImm()));` This statement adds a new element to the `Cond` vector, which is a `SmallVectorImpl` object. The element is created using the `MachineOperand::CreateImm` function, which takes an immediate value as an argument. The immediate value is obtained by calling the `getImm` method on the `ThisCond` vector, which is a `SmallVector<" LLVM,RISCV,1979,"Based on the code snippet you provided, it appears to be a part of a function that is generating machine code for a specific instruction. The function is checking various conditions and setting the `Opcode` variable to different values based on those conditions. Here's a breakdown of the code snippet: 1. `else if ( . contains ( DestReg , SrcReg ) ) Opcode = ;`: This line checks if the `DestReg` and `SrcReg` registers are contained in the `STR_LIT` string. If" LLVM,RISCV,1980,"The code snippet you provided is a part of a function called `expandPostRAPseudo` that is part of a class called `InstrInfo`. The function takes a `MachineInstr` object as an argument and returns a `bool` value. The function uses a `switch` statement to check the opcode of the `MachineInstr` object and perform different actions based on the opcode. The `default` case is executed if the opcode is not recognized. Based on the code snippet you provided, it is not possible to predict the next statement of the code with certainty" LLVM,RISCV,1981,"I cannot predict the next statement of this code snippet as it is not a complete code and the context is not provided. The code snippet appears to be a part of a larger program and it is not possible to determine the next statement without knowing the entire program and the context in which it is being executed. Additionally, the code snippet contains placeholders such as `` and `` which are not defined in the provided code snippet, making it difficult to understand the purpose of the code. It is important to note that predicting the next statement of a code snippet is not always" LLVM,RISCV,1982,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `BuildMI` and `addMBB` functions, as well as the value of the `count` variable. However, based on the code provided, it appears that the next statement will be: `count++;` This is because the `count` variable is incremented by 1 at the end of the `BuildMI` function, and the `addMBB` function is called with the `FBB` parameter, which is a function that takes a `MBB" LLVM,RISCV,1983,"Based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the next statement will be a `case` statement with a string literal as the condition. The string literal is likely to be a register name or a memory address. Without more context, it is difficult to provide a more specific prediction. If you have any additional information or context about the code, I would be happy to try and provide a more accurate prediction." LLVM,RISCV,1984,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific values of the variables and the behavior of the `BuildMI`, `addImm`, `addReg`, and `llvm_unreachable` functions. However, based on the syntax and structure of the code, it appears that the next statement will be a `case` statement, possibly with a `break` statement following it." LLVM,RISCV,1985,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `isSimpleMove` function and the values of the variables `MI`, `FrameIndex`, and ``. However, based on the name of the function and the parameters passed to it, it is likely that the function will return a boolean value indicating whether the move is simple or not." LLVM,RISCV,1986,"Based on the code snippet you provided, it appears to be a function that determines whether a machine instruction is a simple move instruction. The function takes three arguments: * `MI`: a reference to a `MachineInstr` object, which represents a machine instruction. * `FrameIndex`: a reference to an integer that will be set to the index of the frame that the instruction is moving. * `Flag`: an integer that represents a flag that is used to determine whether the instruction is a simple move. The function first retrieves the instruction description from the `MachineInstr` object using the" LLVM,RISCV,1987,"Based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the next statement will be: `FrameIndex = MI.getOperand().getIndex();` This is because the previous line of code checks the flags of the instruction and the operands of the instruction, and if the conditions are met, it sets the `FrameIndex` variable to the index of the operand and returns the register of the operand." LLVM,RISCV,1988,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the `isStoreToStackSlot` function depends on the specific implementation of the `InstrInfo` class and the `MachineInstr` class. However, based on the name of the function and the parameters it takes, it is likely that the function checks whether the given machine instruction is a store to a stack slot, and if so, returns the index of the stack slot. Here is a possible next statement of the code snippet: ``` if (MI.isStoreToStackSlot())" LLVM,RISCV,1989,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific values of the string literals and the input to the function. However, based on the pattern of the code, it is likely that the next statement will be another `case` statement with a string literal and a corresponding `return` statement." LLVM,RISCV,1990,"Based on the code snippet you provided, it appears to be a switch statement that is checking the value of a string literal. The next statement after the first case would be the second case, which is also checking the value of a string literal. Therefore, the next statement of this code snippet would be: case : return isIntN ( , BrOffset ) ; This statement is checking if the string literal is equal to the integer literal and if the offset is equal to the integer literal ].setImm(getOppositeBranchOpcode(Cond[].getImm()));` This statement is executed if the condition `Cond.size() == ` and `` is true, and the `getImm()` method of `Cond[]` returns ``. The `setImm()` method is called on `Cond[]`" LLVM,RISCV,1992,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it appears to be part of a larger program and the context is not provided. However, based on the syntax and structure of the code, it appears to be a sequence of function calls and assignments. The first function call is to `BuildMI`, which takes several arguments: `MBB`, `MBBI`, `DL`, `get()`, and `DstReg`. The second function call is to `addImm`, which takes two arguments: `Hi20` and `Flag`." LLVM,RISCV,1993,"The next statement of this code snippet is: BuildMI(MBB, MBBI, DL, get(), DstReg).addImm(Hi20).setMIFlag(Flag); Explanation: This code snippet is defining a function called ""movImm32"" that takes several parameters and performs a series of operations on them. The function is defined within a class called ""InstrInfo"" and is marked as ""const"" because it does not modify any member variables of the class. The function first asserts" LLVM,RISCV,1994,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific inputs and the behavior of the functions called. However, based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the next statement will be: `TBB = ThisTarget->getMBB();` This is because the code snippet is currently inside a loop that iterates over the instructions in a basic block, and the `TBB` variable is being used to store the current basic block. The `ThisTarget` variable is a pointer to a `MachineOperand` object, and the `isMBB" LLVM,RISCV,1995,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet without knowing the specific implementation of the `loadRegFromStackSlot` function and the context in which it is being called. However, based on the name of the function and the parameters it takes, it appears to be a function that loads a register with a value from a stack slot. The function takes several parameters, including a reference to a `MachineBasicBlock` object, an iterator `I` that points to the current instruction in the block, an unsigned integer `DstReg` that represents the destination register, an integer `FI` that represents" LLVM,RISCV,1996,"This code snippet is a part of the LLVM compiler infrastructure, specifically the instruction selection and scheduling pass. It is attempting to load a register from a stack slot. The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be a call to the `CreateLoad` function, which is a member of the `MachineInstr` class. This function creates a new machine instruction that loads a value from memory into a register. The `CreateLoad` function takes several arguments, including the opcode of the instruction to create, the register to load the value into, and the stack slot to load the value from." LLVM,RISCV,1997,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `InstrInfo::InstrInfo(const Subtarget &Subtarget) : GenInstrInfo(, ), Subtarget(Subtarget) {` This is a constructor for the `InstrInfo` class, which is a subclass of `GenInstrInfo`. The constructor takes a reference to a `Subtarget` object as an argument, and initializes the `Subtarget` member variable of the `InstrInfo` object with the value of the `Subtarget` argument. It also" LLVM,RISCV,1998,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `InstrInfo::InstrInfo(const Subtarget &Subtarget) : GenInstrInfo(, ), Subtarget(Subtarget) {` This is a constructor for the `InstrInfo` class, which is a subclass of `GenInstrInfo`. The constructor takes a reference to a `Subtarget` object as an argument, and initializes the `Subtarget` member variable of the `InstrInfo` object with the value of the `Subtarget` argument. It also" LLVM,RISCV,1999,"This code snippet appears to be part of a larger program that is generating machine code for a specific architecture. It is difficult to predict the next statement with certainty without knowing the context and the specific architecture being targeted. However, based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the next statement could be a call to the `BuildMI` function, which is likely to be a function that builds a machine instruction for the target architecture. The `BuildMI` function takes several arguments, including the basic block, instruction, debug location, opcode, and other information. The `Opcode` variable in the" LLVM,RISCV,2000,"It's difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific values of the variables and the behavior of the `BuildMI` and `getKillRegState` functions. However, based on the code snippet, it appears that the next statement will be a call to the `BuildMI` function with the following arguments: * `MBB`: The current basic block. * `MBBI`: The current basic block instruction. * `DL`: The current data layout. * `get()`: The value of the" LLVM,RISCV,2001,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `case TargetOpcode :: INLINEASM :`" LLVM,RISCV,2002,"This code snippet is part of a function that appears to be generating machine code for a specific instruction set architecture (ISA). The function is using a `switch` statement to handle different opcodes, and each `case` statement is returning a value based on the opcode. The next statement after the code snippet you provided would likely be the `default` statement, which is executed if none of the other `case` statements match the opcode. The `default` statement would likely return an error or throw an exception, indicating that the opcode is not supported. Here is a breakdown of the code" LLVM,RISCV,2003,"The next statement of this code snippet is: BuildMI(MBB, MBBI, DL, get(), DstReg) Explanation: The code snippet is a part of a function named ""copyPhysReg"" that is defined in a class named ""InstrInfo"". The function takes several parameters, including ""MBB"" and ""MBBI"", which are iterators for a machine basic block, and ""DL"", which is a debug location. The function also takes ""DstReg"" and ""SrcReg"", which are unsigned integers representing" LLVM,RISCV,2004,"This code snippet is a part of a larger function that appears to be generating machine code for a specific instruction set architecture (ISA). The function is using a switch statement to handle different types of instructions, and the code snippet you provided is for the case where the instruction is of type `TargetOpcode::INLINEASM`. The function is returning a value of type `int` that represents the length of the inline assembly code. The length is being calculated by calling the `getInlineAsmLength` function, which takes two arguments: the name of the symbol representing the inline assembly code, and a reference" LLVM,RISCV,2005,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific values of the string literals and the control flow of the program. However, based on the syntax and structure of the code, it appears that the next statement will be a `return` statement, possibly returning one of the string literals." LLVM,RISCV,2006,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `MachineInstr & MI = * BuildMI ( & MBB , DL , get ( ) ) . addMBB ( TBB ) ;` This statement creates a new `MachineInstr` object named `MI` and initializes it with the result of the `BuildMI` function, which takes the current basic block (`MBB`), the data layout (`DL`), and a string literal (``) as arguments. The `addMBB` method is then called on the `MI" LLVM,RISCV,2007,"Based on the code snippet you provided, it appears to be a method that determines whether a machine instruction is a load from a stack slot. The method takes a `MachineInstr` object and an integer as input, and returns a boolean value indicating whether the instruction is a load from a stack slot. The method first checks the opcode of the instruction to see if it is one of the following: * `STR_LIT` * `STR_LIT` * `STR_LIT` * `STR_LIT` * `STR_LIT` *" LLVM,RISCV,2008,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return ;` This is because the `if` statement checks if the operand is a frame index, and if it is, it returns the frame index. If the operand is not a frame index, it returns the literal value ``." LLVM,RISCV,2009,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific values of the variables and the behavior of the `MI` object. However, based on the code provided, it appears that the next statement will be: `return MI.getOperand().getReg();` This is because the code checks the operand at index `` to see if it is a frame index, and if so, returns the register associated with that frame index. If the operand is not a frame index, the code" LLVM,RISCV,2010,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific values of the variables and the behavior of the `getOperand` and `isFI` methods. However, based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the next statement will be: `MI.getOperand().getImm()` This is because the code is checking if the operand at index `` is a FI (first immediate) and if it is an immediate value, and if so, it is getting the immediate value" LLVM,RISCV,2011,"Based on the code snippet provided, it appears to be a part of a larger function that is loading a register from a stack slot. The code is using the LLVM API to create a machine instruction and add it to a basic block. The next statement of the code snippet is likely to be a call to the `BuildMI` function, which is used to create a machine instruction. The `BuildMI` function takes several arguments, including the basic block, the instruction iterator, the debug location, the opcode, and the destination register. The opcode is determined based on the target register class and the target register" LLVM,RISCV,2012,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `BuildMI(MBB, I, DL, get(Opcode), DstReg).addFrameIndex(FI).addImm();` This statement is a method call to `BuildMI`, which is a method that creates a new machine instruction. The method takes several arguments, including the basic block `MBB`, the instruction `I`, the data layout `DL`, the opcode `Opcode`, and the destination register `DstReg`. The method returns a new machine instruction, which is then modified by" LLVM,RISCV,2013,"The next statement of this code snippet is: BuildMI(MBB, MBBI, DL, get(), DstReg).addImm(Hi20).setMIFlag(Flag);" LLVM,RISCV,2014,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `MachineOperand` class and the `CreateImm` method. However, based on the code snippet provided, it is likely that the next statement will be: `Target = LastInst . getOperand ( ) . getMBB ( ) ;` This is because the `push_back` method is used to add an element to the end of a vector, and the `CreateImm` method is used to create an immediate value." LLVM,RISCV,2015,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `MachineOperand` class and the `CreateImm` method. However, based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the next statement will likely be a call to the `push_back` method of the `Cond` vector, passing in a new `MachineOperand` object created using the `CreateImm` method and the opcode of the last instruction. Here is a possible next statement: ``` Cond.push_back(MachineOperand::CreateIm" LLVM,RISCV,2016,"The next statement in the code snippet is: `I = MBB.end()` This is because the `eraseFromParent()` method is called on the current instruction `I`, which removes it from its parent basic block. The `if` statement checks if the instruction was removed, and if so, it updates the `BytesRemoved` variable. The `I = MBB.end()` statement sets the current instruction `I` to the end of the basic block. The next statement is `if (I == MBB.begin())`, which checks if the current instruction `I`" LLVM,RISCV,2017,"The next statement of this code snippet is: * BytesRemoved += getInstSizeInBytes( *I ); Explanation: The code snippet is part of a function that is removing instructions from a machine basic block (MBB). The iterator I is being used to iterate through the instructions in the MBB. The code checks whether the current instruction is a conditional branch, and if it is not, it erases it from its parent and updates the BytesRemoved variable with the size of the instruction that was removed. The next statement is to update the BytesRemoved variable with" LLVM,RISCV,2018,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `Cond[].setImm(getOppositeBranchOpcode(Cond[].getImm()));` This statement is setting the immediate value of the instruction at index `` in the `Cond` array to the opposite branch opcode of the current immediate value. The `getOppositeBranchOpcode` function is called with the current immediate value as an argument, and the result is used as the new immediate value." LLVM,RISCV,2019,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the code depends on the specific values of the variables and the implementation of the `Cond` class. However, based on the code snippet, it appears that the code is trying to set the immediate value of a condition to the opposite of its current value. The `Cond` class appears to have a method called `getImm` that returns the immediate value of the condition, and a method called `setImm` that sets the immediate value of the condition. The code snippet first calls `getImm`" LLVM,RISCV,2020,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be the initialization of the `InstrInfo` object with the values provided in the constructor. Based on the code snippet, it appears that the `InstrInfo` class is derived from the `GenInstrInfo` class, and the constructor for `InstrInfo` is calling the constructor for `GenInstrInfo` with two string arguments. Therefore, the next statement of this code snippet is likely to be the initialization of the `InstrInfo` object with the values provided in the constructor, which would involve calling the constructor for `" LLVM,RISCV,2021,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be the initialization of the `InstrInfo` object with the values provided in the constructor. Based on the code snippet, it appears that the `InstrInfo` class is derived from the `GenInstrInfo` class, and the constructor for `InstrInfo` is calling the constructor for `GenInstrInfo` with two string arguments. Therefore, the next statement of this code snippet is likely to be the initialization of the `InstrInfo` object with the values provided in the constructor, which would involve calling the constructor for `" LLVM,RISCV,2022,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific values of the variables and the behavior of the `hasSubClassEq` method. However, based on the code snippet, it appears that the `else if` block is checking if the `hasSubClassEq` method returns `true` for the given `RC` value. If it does, the `Opcode` variable is set to a string literal. If it does not, the `llvm_unreachable` method is called with a string literal as an argument." LLVM,RISCV,2023,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific values of the variables and the behavior of the `hasSubClassEq` and `getRegSizeInBits` functions. However, based on the information provided, it appears that the code is checking the subclass of a string literal and setting the `Opcode` variable based on the result. Here is a possible next statement: `Opcode = TRI -> getRegSizeInBits ( ) == ? ;`" LLVM,RISCV,2036,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `unsigned Op1Code = Op1 -> getOpcode ( ) ;` This line of code gets the opcode of the second operand of the current node (N) and stores it in the variable `Op1Code`." LLVM,RISCV,2037,"The next statement of this code snippet is: AM.Offset = TestOffset;" LLVM,RISCV,2038,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific inputs and the behavior of the functions being called. However, based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the next statement will be: `Offset = CurDAG->getTargetFrameIndex(FrameIndex, VT);` This is because the code checks whether `Base` is a register or a constant, and if it is a register, it sets `Offset` to the target frame index for the register. If `Base` is a constant, it checks whether the value type of `Base" LLVM,RISCV,2039,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return CurDAG->getTargetConstant(Imm, SDLoc(Node), Node->getValueType());` This statement is a return statement that returns the result of the `getTargetConstant` method of the `CurDAG` object, which is a `SDValue` object. The `getTargetConstant` method takes three arguments: the first is the immediate value `Imm`, the second is the `SDLoc` object created from the `Node` object, and the third is the value" LLVM,RISCV,2040,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `CurDAG` and `SDLoc` classes, as well as the values of the variables `Imm`, `Node`, and ``. However, based on the syntax and structure of the code, it appears that the next statement will likely be a call to the `getTargetConstant` method of the `CurDAG` object, passing in the `Imm` and `SDLoc` objects as arguments, along with the result of the `getValue" LLVM,RISCV,2041,The next statement after `return ;` would be the end of the function. LLVM,RISCV,2042,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `DAG` and `Node` classes, as well as the context in which this code is being executed. However, based on the information provided, it is likely that the next statement will be a call to the `DAG` class's `repositionNode` method, passing in the result of the `Pos` class's `getIterator` method and the result of the `N` class's `getNode` method. Here is a breakdown of the code" LLVM,RISCV,2043,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the code depends on the specific values of the variables `OffR` and `Val`. However, based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the function `isValidOffset` is checking whether the offset represented by `OffR` is a valid offset for a string literal. If `OffR` is a valid offset for the string literal, the function will return `true`. Otherwise, it will return `false`. Without knowing the specific values of `OffR` and `Val`, it" LLVM,RISCV,2044,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the code depends on the specific values of the variables and the objects being iterated over. However, we can make some educated guesses based on the code snippet provided. The outer loop iterates over the elements of `MF`, which is presumably a container of some kind (e.g. a vector, list, or map). The inner loop iterates over the elements of each element in `MF`, which is presumably a container of some kind as well. Based on the syntax" LLVM,RISCV,2045,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the code depends on the specific values of the variables `form` and `offr`, as well as the implementation of the `AddressingMode` class. However, based on the information provided, it is likely that the next statement will be an assignment to the `Base` field of the `AddressingMode` object, using the value of the `form` variable as the base address. The `Offset` field will also be assigned a value, which is likely to be the value of the `offr" LLVM,RISCV,2046,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the code depends on the specific values of the variables `form` and `offr`, as well as the implementation of the `AddressingMode` class. However, based on the information provided, it is likely that the next statement will be an assignment to the `Base` field of the `AddressingMode` object, using the value of the `form` variable as the base address. The `Offset` field will also be assigned a value, which is likely to be the value of the `offr" LLVM,RISCV,2047,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be the initialization of the `Lowering` and `Subtarget` members of the `DAGToDAGISel` class. The `Lowering` member is initialized with the result of calling the `getTargetLowering()` method on the `Subtarget` member, which is itself initialized with the result of calling the `getSubtargetImpl()` method on the `TargetMachine` object. Therefore, the next statement of this code snippet is likely to be: ``` Lowering = Subtarget->getTargetLowering(); ```" LLVM,RISCV,2048,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be the initialization of the `Lowering` and `Subtarget` members of the `DAGToDAGISel` class. The `Lowering` member is initialized with the result of calling the `getTargetLowering()` method on the `Subtarget` member, which is itself initialized with the result of calling the `getSubtargetImpl()` method on the `TargetMachine` object. Therefore, the next statement of this code snippet is likely to be: ``` Lowering = Subtarget->getTargetLowering(); ```" LLVM,RISCV,2049,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return ret;` This statement returns the value of the `ret` variable, which is the result of the `SelectionDAGISel::runOnMachineFunction()` method. The `runOnMachineFunction()` method is called on the `SelectionDAGISel` object, which is a subclass of the `MachineFunction` class. The `runOnMachineFunction()` method performs some processing on the machine function and returns a boolean value indicating whether the function was successfully processed. The `processFunctionAfterISel()` method is then called on the `MachineFunction" LLVM,RISCV,2050,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be the initialization of the `DAG` object, which is used to represent the data flow graph of the machine function. The `DAG` object is typically created by the `MachineFunction` object, and it is used to perform various optimizations and transformations on the machine code. Here is an example of how the `DAG` object might be initialized: ``` DAG *dag = new DAG(MF); ``` This creates a new `DAG` object and initializes it with the machine function `MF`. The `" LLVM,RISCV,2051,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `ResNode = SelectCode(Node);` This line of code calls the `SelectCode` function with the `Node` as an argument, and assigns the result to the `ResNode` variable. The `SelectCode` function is not defined in the code snippet you provided, so it is not possible to determine what it does or what it returns. However, based on the name of the function, it appears to be a function that selects a code path based on the value of the `Node` variable." LLVM,RISCV,2052,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the program depends on the values of the variables and the implementation of the `selectMemRegAddr` function. However, based on the code snippet, it is likely that the next statement will be: `OutOps.push_back(Offset);` This is because the `OutOps` vector is being populated with the values of the `Base` and `Offset` variables, and the `Offset` variable is the last variable being pushed onto the vector." LLVM,RISCV,2053,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `if (isInt(CN->getSExtValue())) {` This is because the code checks if the value of `CN` (which is a `ConstantSDNode`) can be represented as an integer with `NUM_LIT` bits. If it can, then the code enters the `if` block and performs the necessary operations to set the `Base` and `Offset` variables." LLVM,RISCV,2054,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the program depends on the specific input and the implementation of the `switch` statement. However, based on the syntax and the fact that the `case` statement is followed by a string literal, it is likely that the next statement will be the body of the `case` statement, which will be executed if the input string matches the string literal." LLVM,RISCV,2055,"The next statement after the `if` statement would be `return false;`. This is because the `if` statement checks if the opcode of the address is equal to ``, and if it is, it sets the `Target` variable to the operand at index `` and returns `true`. If the opcode is not equal to ``, the `if` statement is skipped and the function returns `false`." LLVM,RISCV,2056,"The next statement after the code snippet you provided is: `return true;` This statement is executed after the `Base = Addr;` statement, and it returns the value `true` to indicate that the `selectRegAddr` function has successfully selected a register address." LLVM,RISCV,2057,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the `selectRegAddr` function is not specified. However, based on the name of the function and the parameters it takes, it is likely that the function is used to select a register address based on the value of `Addr` and store the result in `Base`. Here is a possible next statement of the code snippet: ``` Base = selectRegAddr(Addr); ``` This statement would call the `selectRegAddr` function with the value of `Addr`" LLVM,RISCV,2058,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of the code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific values of the variables and the implementation of the `Select` function. However, based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the next statement will be: ``` SDValue Result = CurDAG->getNode(Opcode, DL, VT, Lower, Upper); ``` This statement creates a new node in the DAG with the given opcode, data layout, and value type, and with the `Lower` and `Upper` values as its operands. The `Select`" LLVM,RISCV,2059,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `SDValue New = CurDAG->getCopyFromReg(CurDAG->getEntryNode(), SDLoc(Node), , XLenVT);` This statement creates a new `SDValue` object called `New` by calling the `getCopyFromReg` method of the `CurDAG` object, passing in the `EntryNode` of `CurDAG`, the `SDLoc` of `Node`, the string literal ``, and the value type `XLenVT`. The" LLVM,RISCV,2060,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific input and the behavior of the `ReplaceNode` and `getTargetConstant` functions. However, based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the next statement will be: `ReplaceNode(Node, CurDAG->getMachineNode(, DL, VT, TFI, Imm));` This statement is likely to replace the current node with a new machine node that has the same value type as the current node, but with a different value." LLVM,RISCV,2061,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return false;`" LLVM,RISCV,2062,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the `selectRVVSimm5` function is not specified. However, based on the name of the function and the parameters passed to it, it is likely that the function is selecting a value from a range of values based on the input parameters. Without more information about the implementation of the `selectRVVSimm5` function, it is not possible to provide a more specific prediction of the next statement of the code snippet." LLVM,RISCV,2063,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the `selectShiftMask32` function is not specified. However, based on the name of the function and the parameters it takes, it is likely that this function is used to select a shift amount for a 32-bit value. The `N` parameter is likely to be the 32-bit value that is being shifted, and the `ShAmt` parameter is likely to be the shift amount. The function is likely to return a boolean value indicating whether the shift amount is valid" LLVM,RISCV,2064,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet without knowing the context and the definition of the functions and variables involved. However, based on the syntax and the names of the functions and variables, it appears that the code is trying to perform a bitwise shift operation on a value `N` by a certain amount `ShAmt`. The `selectShiftMask` function is likely being used to select the appropriate shift mask based on the length of the value `N` and the shift amount `ShAmt`. Without more information, it is not possible to determine the exact behavior of this code snippet or" LLVM,RISCV,2065,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet without knowing the context and the definition of the functions and variables involved. However, based on the syntax and the names of the functions and variables, it appears that the code is trying to perform a bitwise shift operation on a value `N` by a certain amount `ShAmt`. The `selectShiftMask` function is likely being used to select the appropriate shift mask based on the length of the value `N` and the shift amount `ShAmt`. Without more information, it is not possible to determine the exact behavior of this code snippet or" LLVM,RISCV,2066,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `LLVM_DEBUG(dbgs() << ""Found a load with a constant offset: "");` This statement is part of a larger block of code that is responsible for recognizing and optimizing loads with constant offsets. The code is using the `LLVM_DEBUG` macro to print a debug message to the console, indicating that it has found a load instruction with a constant offset. The message includes the offset value, which is obtained by calling the `getConstantOperandVal` method on the `SDNode` object `N`." LLVM,RISCV,2067,"The next statement after the `switch` statement would be the `default` case, which is the last case in the `switch` statement. The `default` case is executed when none of the other cases match the value of `ConstraintID`. In this case, the `default` case is empty, so the next statement would be the statement after the `switch` statement." LLVM,RISCV,2068,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `default :`" LLVM,RISCV,2069,"Based on the code snippet provided, it is difficult to predict the next statement with certainty. However, based on the context of the code, it appears that the next statement is likely to be a call to a function that takes a `SDValue` and a `const MCInstrDesc &` as arguments. The function is likely to be a member of the `SDNode` class, and it is possible that it is a method that is used to create a new `SDValue` object based on the current `SDNode` object and the provided `MCInstrDesc` object. Without" LLVM,RISCV,2070,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the `hasAllNBitUsers` function is not specified. However, based on the name of the function, it is likely that it returns a boolean value indicating whether all users of the `Node` have a certain property or attribute. The `` placeholder in the code snippet suggests that the function takes a numerical literal as an argument, which could be used to specify the number of bits that must be set in the users' attributes in order for the function to return `true`. With" LLVM,RISCV,2071,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the function depends on the specific implementation of the `SDNode` class and the input data. However, based on the name of the function, it appears that the function is intended to check whether a given `SDNode` object has all the users of a certain type (possibly `WUsers`). Assuming that the `SDNode` class has a method called `getUsers()` that returns a list of all the users of the node, and that the `WUsers` class is a subclass of `SD" LLVM,RISCV,2072,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the `hasAllNBitUsers` function is not specified. However, based on the name of the function, it is likely that it returns a boolean value indicating whether all users of the `Node` have a certain property or attribute. The `` placeholder in the code snippet suggests that the function takes a numerical literal as an argument, which could be used to specify the number of bits that must be set in the users' attributes in order for the function to return `true`. With" LLVM,RISCV,2073,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `HandleSDNode` function and the contents of the `CurDAG` object. However, based on the code snippet provided, it is likely that the next statement will be a call to the `HandleSDNode` function with the `Dummy` object as an argument. The `HandleSDNode` function is called with the `Dummy` object as an argument, which is an instance of the `SelectionDAG` class. The `SelectionDAG` class is a container" LLVM,RISCV,2074,"Based on the code snippet you provided, it appears to be a part of a larger program that is using the LLVM API to generate machine code for a specific architecture. The code is creating a memory intrinsic node, which is a node in the LLVM intermediate representation (IR) that represents a memory operation. The code is creating a store operation, which is a memory operation that writes data to memory. The store operation is being performed on a stack slot, which is a region of memory that is allocated on the stack. The code is also creating a load operation, which is a memory operation that reads data from memory" LLVM,RISCV,2075,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet without knowing the specific values of the variables and the context in which the code is being executed. However, based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the next statement will be: `SrcReg = SDValue ( Result , ) ;` This statement assigns the value of `Result` to `SrcReg`, with the value of `` used as the second argument to the `SDValue` function. The purpose of this statement is to update the value of `SrcReg`" LLVM,RISCV,2076,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `MachineFunction` and `MachineMemOperand` classes, as well as the values of the variables `CurDAG`, `DL`, `VT`, `Addr`, `Offset`, and `CP`. However, based on the names of the variables and the methods being called, it appears that this code is trying to load a value from a constant pool into a machine register. The `MachineFunction` class is likely a class that represents a function in the machine code, and the" LLVM,RISCV,2077,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `ShAmt = N.getOperand();` This is because the code is checking if the shift amount is a constant that is a power of 2, and if it is, it sets `ShAmt` to the shift amount. If the shift amount is not a constant power of 2, the code will continue to the next statement, which is the `assert` statement." LLVM,RISCV,2078,"The next statement after the code snippet you provided is: `VL = CurDAG->getTargetConstant(, SDLoc(N), N->getValueType());` This statement is executed if the condition `C && C->isAllOnesValue()` is true, which means that `C` is a constant integer with all bits set to 1. In this case, the method `getTargetConstant` is called on the `CurDAG` object with the arguments ``, `SDLoc(" LLVM,RISCV,2079,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific values of the variables and the behavior of the functions called. However, based on the information provided, it appears that the code is checking if a condition is true and, if so, creating a new constant value. The condition being checked is `C && isUInt < > ( C -> getZExtValue ( ) )`, which is a combination of two conditions: * `C`: This is a boolean value that is being checked to see if it is true." LLVM,RISCV,2080,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `const * P = ( NF , IsMasked , IsOrdered , IndexLog2EEW , static_cast < unsigned > ( LMUL ) , static_cast < unsigned > ( IndexLMUL ) ) ;` This statement is assigning a pointer to a constant string literal to the variable `P`. The string literal is constructed using the `NF`, `IsMasked`, `IsOrdered`, `IndexLog2EEW`, `LMUL`, and `IndexLMUL" LLVM,RISCV,2081,"Based on the code snippet provided, it is difficult to predict the next statement with certainty. However, we can make an educated guess based on the context and patterns in the code. The code snippet appears to be part of a function that is processing a node in a directed acyclic graph (DAG). The function is checking the operands of the node and determining the type of the node based on the operands. The function is also creating a new node with a specific opcode and operands. Based on the context and patterns in the code, it is likely that the next statement will" LLVM,RISCV,2082,"The next statement after the `if` block in the code snippet you provided is: `return false;` This statement is executed if the condition in the `if` block is not met, which means that either `N.getOpcode()` is not equal to `` or `N.getOperand().isUndef()` is not `true`. In other words, if the current instruction is not a string literal or if the operand is not undefined, the function returns `false`." LLVM,RISCV,2083,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `SplatVal = DAG.getTargetConstant(SplatImm, SDLoc(N), XLenVT);`" LLVM,RISCV,2084,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be: `SplatVal = CurDAG->getTargetConstant(SplatImm, SDLoc(N), Subtarget->getXLenVT());` This statement is assigning the value of `SplatImm` to `SplatVal`, which is a constant value that is being used to splat the value of `N`. The `getTargetConstant` method is being used to create a constant value that is compatible with the target architecture. The `SDLoc` method is being used to create a" LLVM,RISCV,2085,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be: `SplatVal = CurDAG->getTargetConstant(SplatImm, SDLoc(N), Subtarget->getXLenVT());` This statement is assigning the value of `SplatImm` to `SplatVal`, which is a constant value that is being used to splat the value of `N`. The `getTargetConstant` method is being used to create a constant value that is compatible with the target architecture. The `SDLoc` method is being used to create a" LLVM,RISCV,2086,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `CurDAG->setNodeMemRefs(Store, {MemOp->getMemOperand()});` This line sets the memory references for the `Store` node, which is a `MachineSDNode` representing a store operation. The `setNodeMemRefs` method is called on the `CurDAG` object, which is a `DAG` object representing the data-flow graph of the program. The first argument to `setNodeMemRefs` is the `Store` node, and the second argument is a list of" LLVM,RISCV,2087,"Based on the code snippet provided, it appears to be a part of a function that is pushing operands onto a vector called `Operands`. The function is also checking if certain conditions are met, such as `IsStridedOrIndexed` and `IsMasked`, and performing additional operations based on those conditions. It is difficult to predict the next statement of the code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific values of the variables and the behavior of the functions being called. However, based on the code snippet provided, it is possible that the next statement could be: `Operands." LLVM,RISCV,2088,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific values of the variables and the behavior of the functions being called. However, based on the structure of the code, it appears that the next statement will be the start of a new case label, possibly `case :`." LLVM,RISCV,2089,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific values of the variables and the behavior of the functions being called. However, based on the code provided, it appears that the next statement will be: Result = CurDAG->getMachineNode(Inst.Opc, DL, XLenVT, SrcReg, SDImm); This is because the code checks the value of Inst.Opc and if it is equal to , it calls CurDAG->getMachineNode with the setNodeMemRefs(Load, {MemOp->getMemOperand()});` This statement sets the memory references for the `Load` node, which is a machine node created by `CurDAG->getMachineNode()`, to the memory operand of the `MemOp` node, which is a memory operation node. The `setNodeMemRefs()` method is used to set the memory references for a node, and it takes two arguments: the first is the node to set the memory references for," LLVM,RISCV,2093,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific values of the variables and the behavior of the functions being called. However, based on the context and the code structure, it appears that the next statement is likely to be a call to the `addVectorLoadStoreOperands` function, which is used to add operands to the `Operands` vector. The function takes several arguments, including the `Node` object, the `Log2SEW` value, the `DL` value, the `CurOp` value, the `IsMasked` value" LLVM,RISCV,2094,"This code snippet appears to be part of a compiler or assembler that is generating machine code for a specific instruction set architecture (ISA). The code is using a variety of data structures and functions to generate the machine code, including a `MachineSDNode` and a `MemSDNode`. The code is also using a `TargetLowering` class to generate the machine code, which suggests that the code is targeting a specific hardware platform. The `TargetLowering` class is likely providing a set of functions that are used to generate the machine code for the specific ISA. The code is also using" LLVM,RISCV,2095,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `MachineSDNode * Store = CurDAG->getMachineNode(P->Pseudo, DL, Node->getValueType(), Operands);` This statement creates a new `MachineSDNode` object called `Store` using the `getMachineNode` method of the `CurDAG` object. The `Pseudo` property of the `P` object is used as the first argument to `getMachineNode`, which is a string that represents the name of the instruction that is being generated. The `" LLVM,RISCV,2096,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `IndexLMUL = TargetLowering :: getLMUL ( IndexVT ) ;` This statement is assigning the value of the `getLMUL` method of the `TargetLowering` class, with the `IndexVT` argument, to the `IndexLMUL` variable. The `getLMUL` method is used to get the LMUL (Load/Store Multiplier) value for a given vector type, and it is called with the `IndexVT` argument to get the LM" LLVM,RISCV,2097,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet without knowing the specific values of the variables and the machine opcodes. However, based on the structure of the code, it appears that the next statement will be a comparison between the `AddBaseIdx` variable and a constant value. The code is checking if the `AddBaseIdx` variable is equal to a specific constant value, and if it is, it will execute a block of code. If the `AddBaseIdx` variable is not equal to the constant value, it will return `false`. It is also worth noting" LLVM,RISCV,2098,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `if (IsTA) { uint64_t TSFlags = TII->get(I->UnmaskedPseudo).TSFlags; }` This statement is a conditional statement that checks if the `IsTA` variable is true. If it is true, it retrieves the `TSFlags` field of the instruction info for the unmasked pseudo instruction and stores it in a local variable." LLVM,RISCV,2099,"It's difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific values of the variables and the behavior of the functions being called. However, based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the next statement will be a case statement that checks the value of the machine opcode. The code snippet is likely part of a function that is processing a node in a directed acyclic graph (DAG) and performing a transformation on the node based on its opcode." LLVM,RISCV,2100,"The next statement after the code snippet you provided is: `return true;` This is because the code snippet you provided is a series of `case` statements that check various conditions, and if any of those conditions are not met, the function returns `false`. However, if all of the conditions are met, the function returns `true`." LLVM,RISCV,2101,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return llvm::all_of(Values, [](SDValue V) { return V->isUndef(); });` This statement is a call to the `llvm::all_of` function, which takes two arguments: an array of `SDValue` objects and a lambda function that takes an `SDValue` object as an argument and returns a boolean value indicating whether the object is undefined. The lambda function is defined as `[](SDValue V) { return V->isUndef(); }`, which means that it takes an" LLVM,RISCV,2102,"Based on the code snippet provided, it is difficult to predict the next statement with certainty. However, based on the context and the structure of the code, it is likely that the next statement will be another case in the switch statement, possibly with a different string literal as the first argument. The code snippet appears to be part of a function that is processing a sequence of instructions, where each instruction is represented by an object with a specific opcode and operands. The function is using a switch statement to handle each instruction based on its opcode, and it is likely that the next statement will be another case in the" LLVM,RISCV,2103,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `MachineSDNode * Load = CurDAG->getMachineNode(P->Pseudo, DL, , , , Operands);`" LLVM,RISCV,2104,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be the end of the function, as there are no more statements after the `ReplaceUses` calls. The function appears to be a part of a compiler or interpreter that is generating machine code for a specific instruction set architecture (ISA). The function takes a node representing an instruction and a DAG (directed acyclic graph) representing the program, and it generates machine code for the instruction by creating a new node in the DAG. The function first checks if the instruction is a load instruction, and if so, it gets the memory operand" LLVM,RISCV,2105,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it appears to be part of a larger function and the context is not provided. However, based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the next statement will likely be a call to a function named `selectVLOp`, which takes two arguments: a node and a variable `VL`. The function is not defined in the code snippet provided, so it is not possible to determine what it does or what its return value will be. It is also worth noting that the code snippet appears to be using a number of variables and" LLVM,RISCV,2106,"Based on the code snippet provided, it is difficult to predict the next statement with certainty. However, based on the context and the patterns in the code, it is likely that the next statement will be related to the handling of the `ImmOperand` variable, which is an `SDValue` object that represents a memory operand. The code snippet appears to be part of a function that is processing a machine instruction and trying to extract information from it. The `Base` variable is an `SDValue` object that represents the base address of the memory operand, and the `ImmOperand`" LLVM,RISCV,2107,"The next statement of this code snippet is: assert(isa(N->getOperand()));" LLVM,RISCV,2108,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific values of the variables and the behavior of the `getMachineNode` method. However, based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the next statement will be: `Result = CurDAG->getMachineNode(Inst.Opc, DL, XLenVT, SrcReg, SDImm);` This is because the `if` statement checks if `Inst.Opc` is equal to ``, and if it is not, it executes the" LLVM,RISCV,2109,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific values of the variables and the implementation of the functions called. However, based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the next statement will be: Result = CurDAG->getNode(SrcReg, SDImm); This is because the code snippet is setting up a loop that will iterate over the instructions in the sequence, and for each instruction, it will create a node in the DAG using the current register and the immediate value of the instruction. The resulting node will be stored in" LLVM,RISCV,2110,"Based on the code snippet you provided, it appears to be a part of a function that is checking the operands of a node in a graph. The function is checking if the operand at a specific index (represented by ``) is a string literal, and if so, it is returning the value of that operand. If the operand is not a string literal, the function is checking if the operand's value type (represented by `getVT()`) is less than or equal to the value type of the string literal (represented by `<" LLVM,RISCV,2111,The next statement after `Val = N;` is `return true;`. LLVM,RISCV,2112,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `const * P = ( NF , IsMasked , false , true , ScalarSize , static_cast < unsigned > ( LMUL ) ) ;` This statement is a declaration of a constant pointer `P` of type ``, which is initialized with a value of type `` that is constructed using the `NF`, `IsMasked`, `false`, `true`, `ScalarSize`, and `LMUL` values." LLVM,RISCV,2113,"Based on the code snippet provided, it is difficult to predict the next statement with certainty. However, based on the context of the code, it appears that the next statement is likely to be a continuation of the `selectVLSEGFF` function, which is part of the `DAGToDAGISel` class. The function is responsible for selecting the appropriate vector length and element type for a given instruction, based on the target's requirements. The function takes two arguments: `Node`, which is a pointer to an `SDNode` object, and `IsMasked`, which is" LLVM,RISCV,2114,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific inputs and the implementation of the functions being called. However, based on the context and the code snippet provided, it appears that the next statement will be a call to the `createMaskedLoad` function, which is used to create a masked load instruction. The function takes several arguments, including the current DAG, the vector type, the scalar size, the number of elements, the mask, and the load/store operation. The function returns a vector of SDValues, which represent the masked load instruction." LLVM,RISCV,2115,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `createTuple` function and the values of the variables used in the code. However, based on the context and the use of the `createTuple` function, it is likely that the next statement will be a call to the `push_back` method of the `Operands` vector, adding the `StoreVal` value to the vector." LLVM,RISCV,2116,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `CurDAG->setNodeMemRefs(Store, {MemOp->getMemOperand()});` This statement sets the memory references for the `Store` node, which is a machine node, using the `setNodeMemRefs` method of the `DAG` class. The first argument is the `Store` node, and the second argument is a vector of memory operands, which in this case is a single element vector containing the memory operand of the original `Node` (which is a `MemSDNode`)." LLVM,RISCV,2117,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be a call to the `getMachineNode` method of the `CurDAG` object, passing in the `Pseudo` property of the `P` object as the first argument, and the `DL` object as the second argument. The `Node` object is also likely to be passed as an argument to this method, but the exact arguments passed to this method are not specified in the code snippet provided. It is also possible that the next statement of this code snippet is a call to the `setNodeMemRefs` method of the `Cur" LLVM,RISCV,2118,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it appears to be part of a larger program and the context is not provided. However, based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the next statement may be related to the creation of a tuple or vector of values. The code defines a variable `LMUL` as the result of a call to `getLMUL` on an object `TargetLowering`, which is not defined in the code snippet provided. The variable `Regs` is defined as a `SmallVector` of `SDValue` objects, and is" LLVM,RISCV,2119,"It is difficult to determine the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific values of the variables and the behavior of the functions called. However, based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the next statement will be: `Val = N;` This is because the `if` statement is checking whether the value of `N.getOpcode()` is equal to `` and whether the value of `N->getOperand()` is less than or equal to ``. If both of these" LLVM,RISCV,2120,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific inputs and the behavior of the `dyn_cast` and `cast` functions. However, based on the code snippet, it appears that the next statement will be: `Val = N;` This is because the `if` statement checks if `C` is not null and if the value of `C` is equal to a specific value. If this condition is true, then `Val` is set to `N.getOperand()`. Otherwise, the" LLVM,RISCV,2121,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `LLVM_DEBUG(dbgs() << ""New base: "");` This line is a debug statement that prints the string ""New base: "" to the debug output stream. It is followed by a call to the `dump` method of the `Base` object, which is a `SDValue` object. The `dump` method prints the contents of the `SDValue` object to the debug output stream. The next statement after this is: `LLVM_DEBUG(dbgs() << ""New offset: "");`" LLVM,RISCV,2122,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `LLVM_DEBUG(dbgs() << );` This statement is a debug print statement that prints the value of the `STR_LIT` constant to the debug stream. The `dbgs()` function is a debug stream that is used to print debug messages. The `<<` operator is used to concatenate the `STR_LIT` constant with the debug stream." LLVM,RISCV,2123,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return false;` Explanation: The `isConstantMask` function checks if the given `Node` is a constant mask. If the `Node` is not a constant mask, the function returns `false`. The function returns `true` only if the `Node` is a constant mask, which is determined by checking if the `Node` has the opcode `` and its operand at index `` has the opcode ``. If these conditions are met, the" LLVM,RISCV,2124,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet without knowing the context and the specific assembly language being used. However, based on the name of the function `doPeepholeLoadStoreADDI`, it appears to be related to optimizing the code for a processor that supports the ADDI (Add Immediate) instruction. In this case, the next statement of the code snippet might be related to the optimization of the code for the ADDI instruction. For example, it could be a statement that loads a value from memory into a register using the ADDI instruction, or it could be a statement that" LLVM,RISCV,2125,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `case : { SDValue Imm = CurDAG -> getTargetConstant ( , DL , XLenVT ) ; int FI = cast < FrameIndexSDNode > ( Node ) -> getIndex ( ) ; SDValue TFI = CurDAG -> getTargetFrameIndex ( FI , VT ) ; ReplaceNode ( Node , CurDAG -> getMachineNode ( , DL , VT , TFI , Imm ) ) ; return ; }`" LLVM,RISCV,2126,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `case :` This is the start of a new case statement in the switch block. The code inside this case statement will be executed if the value of `Node->getOpcode()` is equal to ``." LLVM,RISCV,2127,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `Result = CurDAG->getMachineNode(Inst.Opc, DL, XLenVT, SrcReg, SDImm);` This statement is inside the `for` loop, and it is executed for each instruction in the `Seq` sequence. The statement creates a new machine node in the selection DAG, using the instruction's opcode, data location, and operands. The `SrcReg` variable is also used as an operand, which is the register that contains the value to be operated on. The `" LLVM,RISCV,2128,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific values of the variables and the behavior of the functions being called. However, based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the next statement will be: Result = CurDAG->getMachineNode(Inst.Opc, DL, XLenVT, SrcReg, SDImm); This is because the code checks the value of Inst.Opc and if it is equal to , it calls getMachineNode with the op" LLVM,RISCV,2129,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `case : {`" LLVM,RISCV,2130,"Based on the code snippet you provided, it appears to be a part of a function that is checking if a value is a power of 2. The function is using the `Shl` class to perform bitwise operations on the value. The next statement in the code snippet is: ``` RS1 = Shl.getOperand(); ``` This statement is assigning the result of the `Shl.getOperand()` method to the `RS1` variable. The `getOperand()` method is used to retrieve the operand of a shift operation," LLVM,RISCV,2131,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `RS1 = Shl.getOperand();` This statement assigns the operand of the `Shl` node (which is a `SDValue` object) to the `RS1` variable. The operand is accessed using the `getOperand` method of the `SDValue` class, and the index of the operand is specified as ``." LLVM,RISCV,2132,"The next statement after the `if` block is: `return true;` This statement is executed if the `if` condition is true, which means that the `XLenVT` is equal to ``. The `return true;` statement returns a value of `true` from the function, indicating that the operation was successful." LLVM,RISCV,2133,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be a return statement, as the code is checking various conditions and returning false if any of them are not met. The specific return statement will depend on the context in which the code is being executed." LLVM,RISCV,2134,"Based on the code snippet provided, it is difficult to predict the next statement with certainty. However, based on the context and the patterns present in the code, it is likely that the next statement will be a case statement or a default statement. The code snippet appears to be part of a function that is processing a node in a directed acyclic graph (DAG). The function is using a switch statement to handle different types of nodes, and each case statement is handling a specific type of node. The code snippet is currently in the middle of a case statement that is handling a node with an opcode of """ LLVM,RISCV,2135,"Based on the code snippet provided, it appears to be a loop that is iterating over a sequence of instructions, and for each instruction, it is creating a new machine node in a directed acyclic graph (DAG) using the `getMachineNode` method of the `CurDAG` object. The `getMachineNode` method takes several parameters, including the instruction opcode, the data layout, the virtual type, and the source register and immediate values. The code snippet is difficult to read and understand without knowing the context and the specific implementation of the `getMachineNode` method. However, based" LLVM,RISCV,2136,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific values of the variables and the behavior of the `getMachineNode` function. However, based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the next statement will be: `SrcReg = SDValue(Result, );` This is because the `if` statement checks if `Inst.Opc` is equal to ``, and if it is, it sets `Result` to the result of calling `CurDAG->getMachineNode`" LLVM,RISCV,2137,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet as it appears to be a fragment of a larger function and the context is not provided. However, based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the function is performing some kind of optimization or transformation on a directed acyclic graph (DAG) representation of a machine code program. The function is using a case statement to handle different types of nodes in the DAG, and it is replacing some of the nodes with new nodes that are created using the `CurDAG->getMachineNode()` function. The function is also using the `ReplaceNode()` function to" LLVM,RISCV,2138,"Based on the code snippet you provided, it appears that the next statement will be: `return true;` The `SelectRORI` function is checking if the `N` operand is a constant and if the `XLenVT` is equal to a specific value. If both conditions are true, it sets the `Shamt` and `RS1` operands and returns `true`. If either condition is false, it does not return anything, which means the function will continue executing the next statement." LLVM,RISCV,2139,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `if (N.getOpcode() == && Subtarget->getXLenVT() == && cast(N.getOperand())->getVT() == ) {` This is the first `if` statement in the code snippet, and it checks whether the opcode of the current node `N` is equal to `` and the XLen of the subtarget is equal" LLVM,RISCV,2140,"Based on the code snippet you provided, it appears to be a part of a function that is trying to perform some bitwise operations on a value. The function is checking if the value is a constant and if it is, it is performing some bitwise operations on it. The next statement of the code snippet you provided is: `if ( isa < ConstantSDNode > ( Srl . getOperand ( ) ) && isa < ConstantSDNode > ( Shl . getOperand ( ) ) && isa < ConstantSDNode" LLVM,RISCV,2141,"Based on the code snippet you provided, it is difficult to predict the next statement with certainty. However, based on the context and the patterns we see in the code, it is likely that the next statement will be related to the manipulation of the `SDValue` objects. Here are a few possibilities: 1. The next statement could be another `if` statement that checks the value of another `SDValue` object. 2. The next statement could be a call to a function that takes an `SDValue` object as an argument. 3. The next statement could be a statement that" LLVM,RISCV,2142,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific inputs and the behavior of the functions being called. However, based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the next statement will be: `RS1 = Srl . getOperand ( ) ;` This is because the previous `if` statement checks if `VC1` is equal to `maskLeadingOnes < uint32_t > ( VC2 )`, and if that condition is true, it sets `RS1` to `" LLVM,RISCV,2143,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `if (auto *GA = dyn_cast(ImmOperand)) {`" LLVM,RISCV,2144,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `doPeepholeLoadStoreOffset();`" LLVM,RISCV,2145,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `DAGToDAGISel` class and the input data it is processing. However, based on the name of the method and the context in which it is being called, it is likely that the next statement will be related to post-processing the intermediate representation (IR) of the DAG after it has been generated by the `DAGToDAGISel` class. Some possible next statements could include: * Calling a function to optimize the IR, such as" LLVM,RISCV,2146,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it appears to be part of a larger program and the context is not provided. However, based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the next statement may be a call to the `getMoveF64FrameIndex` method of the `MachineFunctionInfo` class, which is a member of the `FuncInfo` object. The `getMoveF64FrameIndex` method is used to retrieve the frame index of a move instruction that is used to move a 64-bit value from the stack to a register" LLVM,RISCV,2147,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it appears to be part of a larger program and the context is not provided. However, based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the next statement may be a call to the `getMoveF64FrameIndex` method of the `MachineFunctionInfo` class, which is a member of the `FuncInfo` object. The `getMoveF64FrameIndex` method is used to retrieve the frame index of a move instruction that is used to move a 64-bit value from the stack to a register" LLVM,RISCV,2148,"The next statement after the `if` block is: `Base = CurDAG->getTargetFrameIndex(FIN->getIndex(), Subtarget->getXLenVT());` This statement assigns the result of the `getTargetFrameIndex` method to the `Base` variable, using the `FIN->getIndex()` and `Subtarget->getXLenVT()` as arguments. The `getTargetFrameIndex` method is called on the `CurDAG` object, and it returns a `FrameIndex` object that represents the frame index for the current function. The" LLVM,RISCV,2149,"The code snippet you provided is a part of a function called `SelectAddrFI` that is part of a larger program. The function takes two arguments: `Addr` and `Base`. It appears to be checking if `Addr` is a `FrameIndexSDNode` and if it is, it is checking if the type of `Addr` is a scalar integer. If both of these conditions are true, it is setting the `Base` argument to a value returned by a function called `getTargetFrameIndex` and returning `true`. Without more context, it is difficult to say exactly" LLVM,RISCV,2150,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific input and the behavior of the `dyn_cast` and `getTargetFrameIndex` functions. However, based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the next statement will be: `Base = CurDAG->getTargetFrameIndex(FIN->getIndex(), Subtarget->getXLenVT());` This statement is assigning the result of the `getTargetFrameIndex` function to the `Base` variable, using the `FIN->getIndex()` and `Sub" LLVM,RISCV,2151,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `Base = Addr;` This is because the code checks if `Addr` is a fat pointer, and if it is, it returns `false`. If `Addr` is not a fat pointer, it checks if it is an integer or a string literal. If it is not, it returns `false`. If `Addr` is an integer or a string literal, it sets `Base` to `Addr`." LLVM,RISCV,2152,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `CurDAG` and `FIN` classes, as well as the values of the `Subtarget` and `Capabilities` objects. However, based on the code snippet you provided, it appears that the `CurDAG` class has a method called `getTargetFrameIndex` that takes two arguments: a `FIN` object and a `Subtarget` object. The `FIN` object has a method called `getIndex` that returns an index, and the" LLVM,RISCV,2153,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `CurDAG` and `Subtarget` classes, as well as the values of the `FIN` and `Subtarget` objects. However, based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the next statement will be a call to the `getTargetFrameIndex` method of the `CurDAG` object, passing in the result of the `getIndex` method of the `FIN` object and the result of the `typeForCapabilities` method of the `" LLVM,RISCV,2154,"Based on the code snippet you provided, it appears to be a loop that iterates over the uses of a node in a graph. The loop checks the machine opcode of each use and performs different actions based on the opcode. The next statement of the code snippet you provided is: `case : if ( Bits < ) return false ; break ;` This statement checks if the number of bits in the use is less than a certain value, and if so, returns false." LLVM,RISCV,2155,"The next statement of this code snippet is: return true;" LLVM,RISCV,2156,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the code depends on the value of `N` and the specific implementation of the `Base` class. However, based on the syntax and the fact that the code is returning `true`, it is likely that the next statement will be the end of the function or method." LLVM,RISCV,2157,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific values of the variables and the behavior of the functions being called. However, based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the next statement after `SelectCode(Node)` would be the `return` statement at the end of the function. The `SelectCode` function is called with `Node` as an argument, and it appears that this function is responsible for selecting the appropriate code to execute based on the value of `Node`. If `Node` is a null value, then the `New` variable" LLVM,RISCV,2158,"Based on the code snippet you provided, it appears to be a part of a switch statement. The next statement is likely to be another case label or the default label. Without more context, it's difficult to predict the exact next statement. However, based on the pattern of the code, it's possible that the next statement could be another case label with a similar structure to the previous ones, such as: case : Alternatively, it's possible that the next statement could be the default label, which would be indicated by the keyword ""default""" LLVM,RISCV,2159,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific values of the variables and the implementation of the `createM1Tuple`, `createM2Tuple`, and `createM4Tuple` functions. However, based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the next statement will be: `return createM4Tuple ( CurDAG , Regs , NF ) ;` This is because the code snippet is currently in the `case ` block, which means that the `createM4Tuple" LLVM,RISCV,2160,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `LLVM_DEBUG(dbgs() << ""New base: ""); LLVM_DEBUG(Base->dump(CurDAG)); LLVM_DEBUG(dbgs() << ""New offset: ""); LLVM_DEBUG(N->dump(CurDAG));` This statement is part of the `if` block that starts with `if (auto Const = dyn_cast(ImmOperand)) {`. It is executed when the `ImmOperand` is a `ConstantSDNode`, and it prints" LLVM,RISCV,2161,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific values of the variables and the behavior of the functions being called. However, based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the next statement will be the assignment of a value to the variable `ImmOperand`. The code snippet is part of a function that appears to be processing a directed acyclic graph (DAG) of nodes, where each node represents a computation and the edges represent the dependencies between the computations. The function is iterating over the nodes in the DAG and processing each node" LLVM,RISCV,2162,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific values of the placeholders and the context in which the code is being executed. However, based on the pattern of the code snippet, it is likely that the next statement will be another `case` statement with a different number literal and a string literal as the return value." LLVM,RISCV,2163,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return + Index ;` This is because the `else if` block is executed when `LMUL` is equal to ``, and the `return` statement is executed when the `if` condition is true." LLVM,RISCV,2164,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `Shl = N -> getOperand ( ) . getOperand ( ) ;` This statement assigns the value of the operand of the operand of `N` at index `` to the variable `Shl`. The operand of `N` at index `` is a `ConstantSDNode`, and the operand of that `ConstantSDNode` at index `` is also a `ConstantSD" LLVM,RISCV,2165,"The next statement of the code snippet is: uint32_t VC2 = Srl.getConstantOperandVal();" LLVM,RISCV,2166,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `assert(isa(N->getOperand()));` This statement is an assertion that the operand of `N` at index `` is a `ConstantSDNode`." LLVM,RISCV,2167,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `SDNode` class and the `CurDAG` object. However, based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the next statement will likely be a call to the `ReplaceUses` function, which is used to replace the uses of a node in the DAG with a new value. The `ReplaceUses` function takes two arguments: the first is the node to be replaced, and the second is the new value to be used in its place. In this case," LLVM,RISCV,2168,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific values of the variables and the behavior of the functions being called. However, based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the next statement will be a call to the `ReplaceUses` function, which is used to replace the uses of a value with a new value. The `ReplaceUses` function takes four arguments: the value to be replaced, the new value, the index of the use to be replaced, and the DAG node that contains the use. In this case, the value to" LLVM,RISCV,2169,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be: `SDValue Mask = CurDAG->getTargetConstant(ScalarSize, DL, XLenVT);` This is because the code is setting up the `Mask` variable, which is likely to be used in the next statement to create a mask for the vector load/store operation. The `CurDAG->getTargetConstant` method is used to create a target-specific constant value, which is likely to be used as the mask for the vector operation." LLVM,RISCV,2170,"This code snippet appears to be part of a larger program that is generating machine code for a RISC-V processor. It is using the LLVM framework to generate the code. The code is creating a load instruction for a vector register, and it is using the `createTuple` function to create a tuple of operands for the load instruction. The tuple contains the vector register, the element width, and the load address. The next statement is likely to be a call to the `CurDAG->getMachineNode` function, which is used to create a machine node for the load instruction." LLVM,RISCV,2171,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `SDValue SuperReg = SDValue(Load, );` This statement is assigning the result of the `getMachineNode` method to a variable called `SuperReg`. The `getMachineNode` method is a member of the `DAG` class, and it creates a new node in the DAG with the specified properties. The `SDValue` constructor is being used to create a new `SDValue` object from the `Load` node and the constant integer value ``." LLVM,RISCV,2172,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific values of the variables and the behavior of the functions being called. However, based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the next statement will be a call to the `getMachineNode` method of the `CurDAG` object, passing in a number of arguments related to the creation of a machine node. The `getMachineNode` method is likely to return a pointer to a new machine node, which will be stored in the `Load` variable." LLVM,RISCV,2173,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific inputs and the behavior of the functions called within the snippet. However, based on the code provided, it appears that the snippet is attempting to load a value from memory and then extract a subset of the loaded value based on the input parameters. The first line of the snippet, `unsigned IndexScalarSize = IndexVT . getScalarSizeInBits ( ) ;`, appears to be retrieving the size of a scalar value in bits, which is then used to construct a string literal in the next" LLVM,RISCV,2174,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific values of the variables and the behavior of the functions being called. However, based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the next statement will be a call to the `ReplaceUses` function, which is used to replace the uses of a value with another value. In this case, the `ReplaceUses` function is being called with two arguments: the first is a `SDValue` object representing the value to be replaced, and the second is a `SDValue` object representing the replacement value" LLVM,RISCV,2175,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet without knowing the context and the purpose of the code. However, based on the code snippet provided, it appears to be related to vector processing and the creation of a tuple of registers. The code is using the `createTuple` function to create a tuple of registers, and it is passing the `Regs` vector as an argument to the function. The `Regs` vector is created by iterating over the operands of a node and adding them to the vector. It is also worth noting that the code is using the `getLMUL" LLVM,RISCV,2176,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `SplatVal = N.getOperand(0);`" LLVM,RISCV,2177,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `SplatImm = SignExtend64(SplatImm, EltVT.getSizeInBits());` This statement is executed if the condition `EltVT.bitsLT(XLenVT)` is true, which means that the element type of the vector has a smaller number of bits than the XLenVT. In this case, the `SplatImm` value needs to be sign-extended to the size of the element type." LLVM,RISCV,2178,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be a comparison of the `SplatImm` variable with a constant value. The `isUInt` function is used to check if the value of `SplatImm` is an unsigned integer, and if it is not, the function returns `false`. Therefore, the next statement is likely to be a comparison of `SplatImm` with a constant value, such as: ``` if (SplatImm != ) ``` This comparison is likely to be used to check if the value" LLVM,RISCV,2179,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be a comparison of the `SplatImm` variable with a constant value. The `isUInt` function is used to check if the value of `SplatImm` is an unsigned integer, and if it is not, the function returns `false`. Therefore, the next statement is likely to be a comparison of `SplatImm` with a constant value, such as: ``` if (SplatImm != ) ``` This comparison is likely to be used to check if the value" LLVM,RISCV,2180,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific values of the variables and the behavior of the functions being called. However, based on the context and the structure of the code, it appears that the next statement will likely be a call to a function that takes the `Operands` vector as an argument, possibly to perform some kind of operation on the values stored in the vector. The `Operands` vector is being populated with values from the `Node` object, and it is being constructed with a specific size and type. The `createTuple`" LLVM,RISCV,2181,"Based on the code snippet, it appears that the next statement will be: Operands.push_back(Node->getOperand( + NF)); This is because the code is currently pushing back the operands for the store instruction, and the next operand to be pushed is the one at index + NF." LLVM,RISCV,2182,"The next statement in this code snippet is: `Operands.push_back(SEW);` This line adds the value of `SEW` to the `Operands` vector." LLVM,RISCV,2183,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific values of the variables and the behavior of the functions being called. However, based on the context and the patterns in the code, it is likely that the next statement will be a call to a function that takes the `Operands` array and the `IndexVT` as arguments, and returns a value of type `SDValue`. The `Operands` array is being constructed with a series of calls to `Node->getOperand()`, which suggests that it is being used to store the operands of" LLVM,RISCV,2184,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `SDValue Store = CurDAG->getMachineNode(P->Pseudo, DL, Node->getValueType(), Operands);` This statement creates a new machine node in the DAG using the `getMachineNode` method of the `CurDAG` object. The node is created with the `Pseudo` property of the `P` object, which is a string literal that represents the name of the instruction. The node is also created with the `DL` object, which represents the data layout" LLVM,RISCV,2185,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `Store->setOperand( + NF, Node->getOperand( + NF));` This statement sets the operand of the `Store` node to the value of the `Node` operand, which is the result of the `getOperand` method called on the `Node` object with the argument ` + NF`." LLVM,RISCV,2186,"This code snippet is creating a store operation in a target-specific instruction set architecture (ISA). The ISA is defined by the `` macro, which is not provided in the code snippet. The code is using the `createTuple` function to create a tuple of values to be stored, and the `getLMUL` function to get the load/store multiple (LMUL) value for the store operation. The `getTargetConstant` function is used to get a constant value for the store operation. The `SDValue` type is used to represent values in" LLVM,RISCV,2187,"Based on the code snippet you provided, it appears to be a part of a function that is checking the validity of a machine instruction. The function takes a `SDNode` pointer called `User` and a `Bits` value as input. The function first checks if the `User` node is a machine opcode by calling the `isMachineOpcode()` method. If it is not a machine opcode, the function returns `false`. Next, the function switches on the machine opcode of the `User` node, which is obtained by calling the `getMachineOpcode()` method" LLVM,RISCV,2188,"Based on the code snippet you provided, it appears that the next statement would be: `for (auto UI = Node->use_begin(), UE = Node->use_end(); UI != UE; ++UI) {` This is a loop that iterates over the uses of the `Node` object, which is a `SDNode` object. The loop variable `UI` is initialized to the beginning of the use list, and the loop continues until `UI` reaches the end of the use list. Within the loop, the code checks whether each use of `Node` is a" LLVM,RISCV,2189,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `ImmOperand = CurDAG->getTargetConstant(Const->getSExtValue(), SDLoc(ImmOperand), ImmOperand.getValueType());` This statement is reached if the `ImmOperand` is a `ConstantSDNode`, which is checked using the `dyn_cast` function. If the `ImmOperand` is a `ConstantSDNode`, then the `getSExtValue` method is called on the `ConstantSDNode` to get the signed extension of the" LLVM,RISCV,2190,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `SDValue New = CurDAG->getCopyFromReg(CurDAG->getEntryNode(), SDLoc(Node), , XLenVT);` This statement creates a new `SDValue` object called `New` by calling the `getCopyFromReg` method of the `CurDAG` object, passing in the `EntryNode` of `CurDAG`, the `SDLoc` of `Node`, the string literal ``, and the value type `XLenVT`. The" LLVM,RISCV,2191,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `LLVM_DEBUG` macro and the `dbgs` function. However, based on the syntax and the context of the code, it appears that the next statement is likely to be another call to the `LLVM_DEBUG` macro, possibly with a different message or format string. The `LLVM_DEBUG` macro is used to print debug messages to the console or a log file, and it is typically used to provide additional information about the execution of the program. The `db" LLVM,RISCV,2192,"Based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the next statement will be: `LLVM_DEBUG(dbgs() << ""Found a floating-point constant: "" << F64Val.getMachineOpcode());` This is because the code is currently iterating over the nodes in the `CurDAG` object, and for each node that is a machine opcode and has a specific opcode (which is not shown in the code snippet), it is checking if the node has a floating-point constant operand. If it does, then the code will print a debug message indicating that" LLVM,RISCV,2193,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet without knowing the context and the specific assembly language being used. However, based on the name of the function `doPeepholeLoadStoreADDI`, it appears to be related to optimizing the code for a processor that supports the ADDI (Add Immediate) instruction. In this case, the next statement of the code snippet might be related to the optimization of the code for the ADDI instruction. For example, it could be a statement that loads a value from memory into a register using the ADDI instruction, or it could be a statement that" LLVM,RISCV,2194,"The next statement in the code snippet is: doPeepholeLoadStoreADDI();" LLVM,RISCV,2195,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `SDValue Imm = CurDAG->getTargetConstant(, DL, XLenVT);` This statement is calling the `getTargetConstant` method of the `CurDAG` object, passing in the constant value ``, the `DL` object, and the `XLenVT` object. The return value of this method is assigned to the `Imm` variable." LLVM,RISCV,2196,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `EVT VT = Node->getValueType();` This line of code retrieves the value type of the node `Node` and stores it in the variable `VT`. The value type is used later in the code snippet to determine the type of the constant node." LLVM,RISCV,2197,"The next statement in this code snippet is: `case : if ( Bits < ) return false ; break ;` This is a case statement in a switch block, where the case is checking if the value of `Bits` is less than a certain number (represented by ``). If the condition is true, the statement `return false ;` is executed, which means that the function will return a value of `false`." LLVM,RISCV,2198,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific values of the variables and the behavior of the functions being called. However, based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the next statement will be a call to the `getMachineFunction` method of the `CurDAG` object, which is likely to return a `MachineFunction` object representing the current machine function being compiled." LLVM,RISCV,2199,"The next statement of this code snippet is: return VL;" LLVM,RISCV,2200,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `ReplaceNode(Node, CurDAG->getMachineNode(, DL, VT, TFI, Imm));` This statement is part of a `case` block that handles the `FrameIndexSDNode` opcode. It replaces the current node with a new machine node that has the same opcode as the current node, but with the frame index and the immediate value as its operands. The `CurDAG->getMachineNode` method is used to create the new machine node, and the `" Compiler Type,Target,Idx,Des Compiler Type,Target,Idx,Des LLVM,RISCV,2201,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `ReplaceNode(Node, CurDAG->getMachineNode(, DL, VT, TFI, Imm));`" LLVM,RISCV,2202,"The next statement after the code snippet you provided is: `VL = N;` This is because the `if` statement is checking if `C` is null and if `C->isNullValue()` returns true. If both of these conditions are true, then `VL` is assigned the value of `SDValue(selectImm(CurDAG, SDLoc(N), , Subtarget->getXLenVT()), )`. Otherwise, `VL` is assigned the value of `N`." LLVM,RISCV,2203,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `VL = N;` Explanation: The code snippet is checking if `C` is a null value, and if it is, it sets `VL` to a new value using `selectImm`. If `C` is not null, it sets `VL` to `N`. Therefore, the next statement is `VL = N;`." LLVM,RISCV,2204,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `if (Vec1->getOpcode() == ) {` This is because the code is checking if the opcode of the second operand of the `ShuffleVectorSDNode` is equal to ``. If it is, then the code will execute the block of code inside the `if` statement." LLVM,RISCV,2205,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the `SelectPCLIP` function depends on the specific inputs and the implementation of the function. However, based on the name of the function, it appears to be related to selecting a PC-relative load instruction, and it is likely that the next statement will be related to this operation. Without more information about the specific inputs and the implementation of the `SelectPCLIP` function, it is not possible to provide a more detailed prediction of the next statement." LLVM,RISCV,2206,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet without knowing the specific implementation of the `SelectPCLIPU` function. However, based on the name of the function and the parameters it takes, it appears to be a function that selects a PC-relative load instruction with an unsigned offset. Here are a few possible next statements that could occur after this code snippet: 1. `Dest = SRC1 + SRC2;` 2. `Dest = SRC1 - SRC2;` 3. `Dest = SRC1 * SRC2;` 4. `Dest =" LLVM,RISCV,2207,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific values of the variables and the behavior of the `HandleSDNode` and `SelectCode` functions. However, based on the code snippet, it appears that the next statement will be: `SDValue Or = CurDAG->getNode(Opcode, DL, VT, Upper, Lower);` This statement creates a new node in the DAG with the given opcode, data layout, and value type, and with the `Upper` and `Lower` nodes as its operands" LLVM,RISCV,2208,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `HandleSDNode` and `SelectCode` functions, as well as the values of the `Upper` and `Lower` variables. However, based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the next statement will be a call to the `ReplaceUses` function, which will replace the uses of the `Node` variable with the result of the `getNode` method called on the `Or` variable. The `Or` variable is a node created by the `getNode`" LLVM,RISCV,2209,"Based on the code snippet you provided, it appears to be related to the optimization of a target machine's instruction set. The code is checking the current instruction's opcode and value type, and if it matches a specific pattern, it will perform a certain optimization. The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be a case statement or a series of case statements that handle different opcodes and value types. The code will then perform the appropriate optimization for each case." LLVM,RISCV,2210,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `if (VT == XLenVT && ConstNode->isNullValue()) {`" LLVM,RISCV,2211,"Based on the code snippet you provided, it appears to be a part of a function that is handling different cases for a specific operation. The function is using a switch statement to handle different cases, and each case is handling a specific operation. The next statement after the code snippet you provided is: case : This case is handling the operation for a specific string literal. The code inside this case is checking if the operation is a constant mask and if the mask is a specific value. If the mask is the specific value, the code is selecting a specific node to handle the operation." LLVM,RISCV,2212,"Based on the code snippet, it appears that the next statement will be a comparison of the value of the `Shl` variable with a constant value. The comparison is likely to be done using the `==` operator. The code snippet is from a function called `MatchSLLIUW`, which is part of a class called `DAGToDAGISel`. The function appears to be checking if a given node in a directed acyclic graph (DAG) is a shift left logical immediate unsigned word (SLLIUW) instruction. The function is checking the opcode of the node" LLVM,RISCV,2213,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `assert(isa(N->getOperand()));` This statement is an assertion that the operand of `N` at index `` is a `ConstantSDNode`." LLVM,RISCV,2214,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `case : { LoadSDNode * Load = cast < LoadSDNode > ( Node ) ; if ( Load -> getAddressingMode ( ) != ) break ; SDValue Chain = Node -> getOperand ( ) ; SDValue Base = Node -> getOperand ( ) ; SDValue Offset = Node -> getOperand ( ) ; bool simm12 = false ; bool signExtend = Load" LLVM,RISCV,2215,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet without knowing the specific implementation of the `SelectLoopDecrement` function and the context in which it is being called. However, based on the name of the function and the parameter it takes, it appears to be a function that selects a loop decrement operation for a specific loop. The next statement of this code snippet could be any of the following: 1. A check to see if the loop decrement operation is valid for the current loop. 2. A call to a function that performs the loop decrement operation. 3. A" LLVM,RISCV,2216,"The next statement of this code snippet is: RS1 = Shl.getOperand(); Explanation: The code snippet is checking if certain conditions are met, and if they are, it sets the RS1 register to the result of the Shl operation with the operand . The next statement is to set the RS1 register to the result of the Shl operation." LLVM,RISCV,2217,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it appears to be a part of a larger program and the context is not provided. However, based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the next statement will be the start of a loop, possibly a `for` loop or a `while` loop, as the iterator `Position` is being incremented and the loop condition is being checked. The loop will likely iterate over the nodes in the `CurDAG` object, and for each node, it will check if the node is a machine opcode and if it has" LLVM,RISCV,2218,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet without knowing the context and the purpose of the code. However, based on the syntax and the functions used, it appears to be a part of a program that is manipulating a directed acyclic graph (DAG) data structure. The code defines a function called `dump` that takes a `CurDAG` object as an argument and performs some operation on it. The function also uses the `DEBUG` macro to print some debug information. The next statement in the code snippet is `SDValue From [ ] = { SDValue ( N" LLVM,RISCV,2219,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `DAGToDAGISel::DAGToDAGISel(TargetMachine &TargetMachine, CodeGenOpt::Level OptLevel) : SelectionDAGISel(TargetMachine, OptLevel) {` This is a constructor for the `DAGToDAGISel` class, which is a subclass of `SelectionDAGISel`. The constructor takes two arguments: a reference to a `TargetMachine` object and a `CodeGenOpt::Level` object. It initializes the `SelectionDAGISel` base class" LLVM,RISCV,2220,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `DAGToDAGISel::DAGToDAGISel(TargetMachine &TargetMachine, CodeGenOpt::Level OptLevel) : SelectionDAGISel(TargetMachine, OptLevel) {` This is a constructor for the `DAGToDAGISel` class, which is a subclass of `SelectionDAGISel`. The constructor takes two arguments: a reference to a `TargetMachine` object and a `CodeGenOpt::Level` object. It initializes the `SelectionDAGISel` base class" LLVM,RISCV,2221,"Based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the next statement will be: case : { auto ConstNode = cast < ConstantSDNode > ( Node ) ; if ( VT == XLenVT && ConstNode -> isNullValue ( ) ) { SDValue New = CurDAG -> getCopyFromReg ( CurDAG -> getEntryNode ( ) , SDLoc ( Node ) , , XLenVT ) ; ReplaceNode ( Node , New . getNode ( ) ) ; return ; } int64_t Imm =" LLVM,RISCV,2222,"The next statement of this code snippet is: Operands.push_back(Chain);" LLVM,RISCV,2223,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `static const unsigned RegClassIDs[] = { ""str_lit"", ""str_lit"", ""str_lit"", ""str_lit"", ""str_lit"", ""str_lit"", ""str_lit"" };` This is an array of string literals, where each element is a string literal enclosed in double quotes. The `static` keyword is used to declare the array as a static variable, and the `const` keyword is used to make the array elements constant. The `unsigned` keyword is used to specify that the array elements" LLVM,RISCV,2224,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be the return statement, which returns the result of the `createTupleImpl` function. The `createTupleImpl` function is called with the current DAG, the `Regs` array, the `RegClassIDs` array, and the `NF` parameter. The `RegClassIDs` array is an array of unsigned integers that contains the register class IDs for the registers in the `Regs` array. The `NF` parameter is an unsigned integer that represents the number of registers in the `Regs` array. The" LLVM,RISCV,2225,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `createTupleImpl` function and the values of the variables `CurDAG`, `Regs`, `RegClassIDs`, `NF`, and ``. However, based on the syntax and the context of the code, it is likely that the next statement will be a call to the `createTupleImpl` function, passing in the current DAG, the register file, the register class IDs, and the number of literals as arguments. The function" LLVM,RISCV,2226,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return createTupleImpl(CurDAG, Regs, RegClassIDs[NF - ], );` This statement is a function call to `createTupleImpl`, which is a function that creates a tuple of registers. The function takes four arguments: * `CurDAG`: The current DAG (directed acyclic graph) of the program. * `Regs`: The registers that are being used in the current instruction. * `RegClassIDs[" LLVM,RISCV,2227,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the `createTupleImpl` function is not specified. However, based on the name of the function and the parameters passed to it, it is likely that the function creates a new tuple and returns it. The first parameter passed to the function is `CurDAG`, which is likely a data structure representing the current state of the program. The second parameter is `Regs`, which is likely a list of registers. The third and fourth parameters are ``, which is likely a string literal" LLVM,RISCV,2228,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be the return statement, which returns the result of the `createTupleImpl` function. The `createTupleImpl` function is called with the current DAG, the array of registers, and two string literals as arguments. The function is expected to create a new tuple in the DAG and return it as an `SDValue`." LLVM,RISCV,2229,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be the return statement, which returns a new instance of the `DAGToDAGISel` class, which is a subclass of the `FunctionPass` class. The `createISelDag` function is a factory function that creates a new instance of the `DAGToDAGISel` class, and it takes a reference to a `TargetMachine` object as an argument. The `TM` variable is likely to be an" LLVM,RISCV,2230,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the `llvm_unreachable` function is not specified. However, based on the context, it is likely that the next statement will be a `case` label, as the `default` label is typically used to catch any cases that are not explicitly handled by previous `case` labels. The `llvm_unreachable` function is a built-in function in LLVM that is used to indicate that a particular code path is unreachable. It is typically used in conj" LLVM,RISCV,2231,"Based on the code snippet provided, it appears to be a part of a function that is constructing a vector of operands for an instruction. The vector is being initialized with a constant value from the target constant pool, and then additional values are being pushed onto the vector from a register file. It is difficult to predict the next statement with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the function and the values of the variables involved. However, some possible next statements could include: * Pushing additional values onto the vector from the register file, using a loop similar to the one shown in the code snippet" LLVM,RISCV,2232,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific values of the variables and the behavior of the functions called. However, based on the context, it appears that the code is trying to combine two offsets and check if the result is within a certain range. The first part of the code checks if the operand at index `OffsetOpIdx` is a constant, and if it is not, returns `false`. The second part of the code checks if the operand at index `BaseOpIdx` is a machine opcode with a specific value" LLVM,RISCV,2233,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `ReplaceUses(N, N0.getNode());` This statement replaces all uses of the node `N` with the node `N0.getNode()`." LLVM,RISCV,2234,"Based on the code snippet you provided, it appears to be a part of a switch statement that is checking the value of a variable called `N0`. The variable is being checked against a series of string literals, and depending on the value, a different operation is being performed. The next statement in the code snippet is `SDValue N00 = N0 . getOperand ( ) ;`, which is assigning the result of the `getOperand` method called on `N0` to a variable called `N00`. The `getOperand` method is likely" LLVM,RISCV,2235,The next statement after `return ;` would be the end of the function. LLVM,RISCV,2236,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `doPeepholeSExtW` and `doPeepholeLoadStoreADDI` functions, as well as the state of the `MadeChange` and `CurDAG` variables. However, based on the code snippet you provided, it appears that the `doPeepholeSExtW` and `doPeepholeLoadStoreADDI` functions are being called to perform some kind of optimization or transformation on the `N` object. The" LLVM,RISCV,2237,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet without knowing the specific values of the variables and the context in which the code is being executed. However, based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the next statement will be a call to the `getMachineFunction` method of the `CurDAG` object, which will return a reference to the machine function that is currently being generated. The returned reference will be stored in the `MF` variable, and the code will then proceed to retrieve the `MachineFunctionInfo` object for the current ISA from the `MF` object." LLVM,RISCV,2238,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be the initialization of the `SelectionDAGISel` class, which is the parent class of `DAGToDAGISel`. This is indicated by the call to the constructor of `SelectionDAGISel` in the initializer list of `DAGToDAGISel`. Therefore, the next statement of this code snippet is likely to be the initialization of the `SelectionDAGISel` class, which is the parent class of `DAGToDAGISel`." LLVM,RISCV,2239,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be the initialization of the `SelectionDAGISel` class, which is the parent class of `DAGToDAGISel`. This is indicated by the call to the constructor of `SelectionDAGISel` in the initializer list of `DAGToDAGISel`. Therefore, the next statement of this code snippet is likely to be the initialization of the `SelectionDAGISel` class, which is the parent class of `DAGToDAGISel`." LLVM,RISCV,2240,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet without knowing the context and the specific implementation of the `getSubtarget` method. However, based on the syntax and the fact that the method is called on an object of type `MF`, it is likely that the next statement will involve the `Subtarget` object that was just created. Some possible next statements could be: * Using the `Subtarget` object to perform some operation, such as setting a property or calling a method. * Storing the `Subtarget` object in a variable or data structure for later use." LLVM,RISCV,2241,"The next statement of this code snippet is: Base = FIN->getBasePtr();" LLVM,RISCV,2242,"The next statement after the `if` block is `else Base = Addr ;`. This means that if the `if` condition is not met, the `Base` variable will be assigned the value of `Addr`." LLVM,RISCV,2243,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet without knowing the context and the values of the variables involved. However, based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the next statement will be: `SrcReg = SDValue(Result, );` This is because the code snippet is setting the value of `SrcReg` to a new `SDValue` object, with the first argument being the `Result` of the previous statement, and the second argument being a constant value of type ``." LLVM,RISCV,2244,"The next statement after the `switch` statement will be the `return true` statement. The `switch` statement is checking the value of `ConstraintID` and executing the corresponding code block based on the value. If `ConstraintID` is equal to `InlineAsm::Constraint_m`, the code block for that case will be executed, which includes pushing the `Op` onto the `OutOps` vector and returning `false`. If `ConstraintID` is equal to `InlineAsm::Constraint_A`, the code block for that case will be executed, which includes pushing the `Op" LLVM,RISCV,2245,"The next statement after the `if` statement is: `C->setOperand(0, ConstantInt::get(C->getContext(), 0));` This statement sets the first operand of the `ConstantSDNode` `C` to a constant integer with value 0." LLVM,RISCV,2246,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific values of the variables and the implementation of the `ComputeNumSignBits` and `getSizeInBits` methods. However, based on the code snippet, it appears that the next statement will be: `Val = N;` This is because the `if` statement checks if the number of sign bits in `N` is greater than the number of bits in the value type minus a certain literal value (``). If this condition is true, then the value" LLVM,RISCV,2247,"Based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the next statement will be: `if (AndMask.getBitWidth() == ShiftWidth) {` This is because the code is checking if the bit width of the `AndMask` APInt is equal to the `ShiftWidth` variable, which is an unsigned integer. If the bit widths are equal, then the code will enter the `if` statement and perform some additional operations." LLVM,RISCV,2248,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet without knowing the context and the values of the variables involved. However, based on the syntax and the structure of the code, it appears to be a part of a function that is checking if a certain condition is true, and if it is, it is setting the value of a variable `VL` to a constant value. The condition being checked is whether the value of `C` is less than a certain number, which is represented by the placeholder ``. If this condition is true, the function is calling a method `getTarget" LLVM,RISCV,2249,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `MachineSDNode * Load = CurDAG->getMachineNode(P->Pseudo, DL, , , Operands);` This statement creates a new `MachineSDNode` object called `Load` and initializes it with the `Pseudo` property of the `P` object, the `DL` object, and the `Operands` vector. The `Pseudo` property is a boolean value that indicates whether the node is a pseudo-instruction or not. The `" LLVM,RISCV,2250,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `MachineSDNode * Load = CurDAG->getMachineNode(P->Pseudo, DL, , , Operands);` This statement creates a new `MachineSDNode` object called `Load` and initializes it with the `Pseudo` property of the `P` object, the `DL` object, and the `Operands` vector. The `Pseudo` property is a boolean value that indicates whether the node is a pseudo-instruction or not. The `" LLVM,RISCV,2251,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific inputs and the behavior of the functions being called. However, based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the next statement will be a call to the `setNodeMemRefs` function, which is a member function of the `CurDAG` object. The `setNodeMemRefs` function takes two arguments: a `MachineSDNode` object and a `std::vector` of `SDValue` objects. The `MachineSDNode` object is created by the `getMachineNode" LLVM,RISCV,2252,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it appears to be part of a larger function and the context is not provided. However, based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the next statement may be related to the creation of a machine node for a load operation. The code snippet defines a small vector of SDValues and a masked off SDValue, and then pushes the masked off SDValue onto a vector of operands. It then adds vector load/store operands to the operands vector and asserts that the vector element count of the vector type" LLVM,RISCV,2253,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `SplatVal = N . getOperand ( ) ;` This statement assigns the value of the operand at index `` of the `SDValue` object `N` to the variable `SplatVal`." LLVM,RISCV,2254,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet without knowing the specific implementation of the `selectVSplatSimm5` function. However, based on the name of the function and the parameters it takes, it appears to be related to selecting a value from a splat vector. The `selectVSplatSimm5` function takes two parameters: `N` and `SplatVal`. The `N` parameter is likely a vector of values, and the `SplatVal` parameter is a scalar value that is used to select a specific element from the vector. B" LLVM,RISCV,2255,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return selectVSplatSimmHelper(N, SplatVal, *CurDAG, *Subtarget, [](int64_t Imm) { return isInt(Imm); });` This statement is a function call to `selectVSplatSimmHelper`, which is a member function of the `DAGToDAGISel` class. The function takes several arguments, including `N`, `SplatVal`, `*CurDAG`, `*Subtarget`, and a" LLVM,RISCV,2256,"This code snippet is a part of a function that appears to be related to vectorization and instruction selection in a compiler. The function `selectVSplatSimmHelper` is being called with several arguments, including a lambda function that takes an `int64_t` argument `Imm` and returns a boolean value. The lambda function checks whether `Imm` is an integer less than or equal to `NUM_LIT` and not equal to `-NUM_LIT`, or whether it is equal to `NUM_LIT`. If any of these conditions are true, the lambda function returns `" LLVM,RISCV,2257,"This code snippet is a part of a function that appears to be related to vectorization and instruction selection in a compiler. The function `selectVSplatSimmHelper` is being called with several arguments, including a lambda function that takes an `int64_t` argument `Imm` and returns a boolean value. The lambda function checks whether `Imm` is an integer less than or equal to `NUM_LIT` and not equal to `-NUM_LIT`, or whether it is equal to `NUM_LIT`. If any of these conditions are true, the lambda function returns `" LLVM,RISCV,2258,"The next statement after the code snippet you provided is: `return Imm != && ( ( isInt < > ( Imm ) && Imm != - ) || Imm == ) ; }` This statement is a return statement that returns a boolean value based on the conditions specified in the code snippet. The return value is determined by the logical AND (`&&`) operator, which evaluates to true if both of its operands are true. The first operand of the AND operator" LLVM,RISCV,2259,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be the call to the `selectVSplatSimmHelper` function, which is passed as an argument to the `return` statement. The `selectVSplatSimmHelper` function is defined elsewhere in the code, and it is not possible to determine its exact behavior without seeing its implementation. However, based on the name of the function and the arguments it is passed, it appears to be a helper function for selecting a value based on a splat value and a subtarget. The function takes several arguments, including `N`, `Spl" LLVM,RISCV,2260,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `MVT EltVT = N.getSimpleValueType().getVectorElementType();` This statement assigns the vector element type of the operand `N` to the variable `EltVT`. The `getVectorElementType()` method is called on the `SimpleValueType` object returned by `N.getSimpleValueType()`, which returns the vector element type of the operand." LLVM,RISCV,2261,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `SplatImm = SignExtend64(SplatImm, EltVT.getSizeInBits());` This statement is executed if the condition `EltVT.bitsLT(XLenVT)` is true, which means that the element type of the vector is less than the size of the XLenVT. In this case, the `SplatImm` value needs to be sign-extended to the size of the element type." LLVM,RISCV,2262,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `if (SplatImm == 0) return false;`" LLVM,RISCV,2263,"The next statement after the `if` statement is the assignment of `SplatVal`. The `if` statement checks if `SplatImm` is a valid unsigned integer literal, and if it is not, the function returns `false`. If it is a valid unsigned integer literal, the function assigns the result of `CurDAG->getTargetConstant()` to `SplatVal` and returns `true`." LLVM,RISCV,2264,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `ByValArgInfo` class and the values of the `` placeholders. However, based on the syntax and the fact that the `ByValArgInfo` class appears to be a constructor, it is likely that the next statement will be a call to the `ByValArgInfo` constructor with the specified arguments." LLVM,RISCV,2265,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `ByValArgInfo` class and the values of the `` placeholders. However, based on the syntax and the fact that the `ByValArgInfo` class appears to be a constructor, it is likely that the next statement will be a call to the `ByValArgInfo` constructor with the specified arguments." LLVM,RISCV,2266,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return VT;` Explanation: The `getSetCCResultType` method is defined as a pure virtual method in the `EVT` class, which means that it must be implemented by any derived classes. The method takes a `const DataLayout &` and a `LLVMContext &` as input, and returns an `EVT` object. In this code snippet, the `getSetCCResultType` method is being overridden in a derived class. The method is returning the `VT` object, which" LLVM,RISCV,2267,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `EVT` class and the `isFMAFasterThanFMulAndFAdd` method. However, based on the name of the method and the fact that it is declared as `const`, it is likely that the method returns a boolean value indicating whether the Fused Multiply-Add (FMA) instruction is faster than separate Multiply and Add instructions for the given `EVT` type." LLVM,RISCV,2268,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `EVT` class and the `isFMAFasterThanFMulAndFAdd` method. However, based on the name of the method and the fact that it is declared as `const`, it is likely that the method returns a boolean value indicating whether the Fused Multiply-Add (FMA) instruction is faster than separate Multiply and Add instructions for the given `EVT` type." LLVM,RISCV,2269,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be the initialization of the `RVLocs` vector with the appropriate size and type. The size of the vector is likely to be the number of return values, which is determined by the `Outs` vector. The type of the vector is likely to be `CCValAssign`, which is a type used in the LLVM IR to represent a value assignment. Therefore, the next statement of this code snippet is likely to be: ``` RVLocs.resize(Outs.size(), CCValAssign()); ``` This" LLVM,RISCV,2270,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `CCState` constructor and the `SmallVector` class. However, based on the code snippet provided, it is likely that the next statement will be a call to the `CCState` constructor, passing in the `CallConv`, `IsVarArg`, `MF`, `RVLocs`, and `Context` variables as arguments. Here is an example of what the next statement might look like: ``` CCState CCInfo(CallConv, IsVar" LLVM,RISCV,2271,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific inputs and the behavior of the `isExtInLoc`, `getNode`, `getLoad`, and `assert` functions. However, based on the code snippet, it appears that the next statement will be one of the following: 1. `Value = DAG.getNode(, DL, VA.getValVT(), Value);` 2. `Value = DAG.getLoad(VA.getValVT(), DL, Chain, Value" LLVM,RISCV,2272,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be: `Value = DAG.getNode(, DL, VA.getLocVT(), Value, DAG.getValueType(VA.getValVT()));` This is because the `if` statement that follows the `else if` statement checks whether `VA.isExtInLoc()` is true, and if so, it sets `Value` to the result of `DAG.getNode()` with the same arguments as the previous `if` statement. If `VA.isExtInLoc" LLVM,RISCV,2273,"Based on the code snippet you provided, it appears that the next statement after the `switch` statement would be: `case CCValAssign::ZExt: return DAG.getNode(, DL, VA.getLocVT(), Value);` This is because the `switch` statement is checking the value of `VA.getLocInfo()` and returning a different value depending on the result. In this case, if `VA.getLocInfo()` returns `CCValAssign::SExt`, the first `case` statement will be executed and return the" LLVM,RISCV,2274,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `MachineInstrBuilder jumpMI = BuildMI( *BB, MI, DL, TII->get(jump), RA );` This line creates a new `MachineInstrBuilder` object called `jumpMI` and initializes it with the `BuildMI` function, which takes the current basic block (`BB`), the current machine instruction (`MI`), the data layout (`DL`), the target instruction information (`TII`), and the register allocation (`RA`) as arguments. The `BuildMI` function returns a new machine instruction with the" LLVM,RISCV,2275,"The code snippet you provided is a switch statement in C++. The `case` labels are followed by a colon, and the statements for each case are indented. The `default` label is followed by a colon, and the statement for the default case is indented. The `emitCALL` function is called with the arguments `MI` and `MBB` for each case. The `llvm_unreachable` function is called with the argument `` for the default case. Therefore, the next statement of this code snippet would be the call to `" LLVM,RISCV,2276,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific values of the variables and the implementation of the `getTargetNode` and `getNode` functions. However, based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the next statement will be a call to the `getNode` function, passing in the `ResHi` and `ResLo` values as arguments. The `getNode` function is used to create a new node in the DAG, and it takes several arguments, including the type of the node, the data layout, and the values of" LLVM,RISCV,2277,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the program depends on the specific values of the variables and the implementation of the `getValueType()` method. However, based on the code snippet provided, it is likely that the next statement will be a call to the `getValueType()` method on the `Op` object, which is an instance of the `SDLoc` class. The `getValueType()` method is likely to return a value of type `EVT`, which is a type alias for a specific type of value. The `EVT`" LLVM,RISCV,2278,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `case 'U' : case 'V' : case 'W' : case 'X' : case 'Y' : case 'Z' : return C_Other;`" LLVM,RISCV,2279,"The next statement of this code snippet will be: `return ;` This is because the `if` statement checks if `Subtarget.isRV64()` is true, and if it is, it returns ``. If it is not true, it returns `` again. Therefore, the next statement will always be `return ;`." LLVM,RISCV,2280,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return ;` Explanation: The `getExceptionPointerRegister` method is defined as a constant method, which means it does not modify the object it is called on. It takes a `const Constant*` parameter, which is a pointer to a constant object of type `Constant`. The method checks if the `Subtarget` object, which is a member of the `TargetLowering` class, has the `RV66` flag set. If it does, the method returns the string literal `, &);` This is because the `switch` statement is checking the value of `Constraint[]` and the `default` case is being executed if the value is not equal to any of the other cases. In this case, the value of `Constraint[]` is not equal to any of the other cases, so the `default` case is being executed" LLVM,RISCV,2283,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the program depends on the values of the variables and the specific implementation of the functions being called. However, based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the program is checking the type of the `CallOperandVal` and adjusting the `weight` variable accordingly. The `switch` statement is checking the value of `*constraint`, which is a pointer to a character. The `default` case is executed if the value of `*constraint` is not one of the specific characters handled in the other cases" LLVM,RISCV,2284,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific input and the behavior of the `getPointerTy` and `dyn_cast` functions. However, based on the code snippet, it appears that the next statement could be one of the following: 1. `return DAG.getTargetGlobalAddress(N->getGlobal(), SDLoc(Op), Ty, , Flag);` 2. `return DAG.getTargetExternalSymbol(N->getSymbol(), Ty, Flag);` 3. `return DAG." LLVM,RISCV,2285,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `OPCODE` macro and the values of the `Lo`, `FENCE`, and `SELECT_CC` variables. However, based on the syntax and the fact that the `OPCODE` macro is being used to generate assembly code, it is likely that the next statement will be an assembly instruction or a label." LLVM,RISCV,2286,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `TargetLoweringObjectFileELF::Initialize(Ctx, TM);`" LLVM,RISCV,2287,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be a check for whether the floating-point immediate is negative, since the `isPosZero()` method is already being called. Here's a possible continuation of the code snippet: ``` bool TargetLowering::isFPImmLegal(const APFloat& Imm, EVT VT) const { if (Imm.isPosZero()) { return true; } if (Imm.isNegative()) { return false; } // ... }" LLVM,RISCV,2288,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be a `return` statement, as the `isOffsetFoldingLegal` method is expected to return a boolean value indicating whether offset folding is legal for the given global address. Here's a possible next statement: ``` return false; ``` This statement returns `false` to indicate that offset folding is not legal for the given global address. The `isOffsetFoldingLegal` method is likely to be called by other parts of the code to determine whether offset folding can be applied to a particular global address." LLVM,RISCV,2289,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `Ops.push_back(DAG.getTargetConstant(C->getSExtValue(), SDLoc(Op), Op.getValueType()));`" LLVM,RISCV,2290,"The code snippet you provided is a part of a function called `lowerATOMIC_FENCE` that is part of a class called `TargetLowering`. The function takes two arguments: `Op` and `DAG`. It appears to be related to the lowering of atomic fences in a compiler. The code snippet you provided is incomplete, so it's difficult to predict the next statement with certainty. However, based on the context, it seems likely that the next statement would be a `case` statement that handles the `SequentiallyConsistent` case. Here's a" LLVM,RISCV,2291,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet without knowing the context and the specific implementation of the `getOffset` and `getPointerTy` methods. However, based on the names of the methods and the types of the variables, it is likely that the next statement will be related to the manipulation of the offset and the pointer type. Here are a few possibilities: * The next statement could be an assignment to a variable that stores the result of the `getOffset` method, such as `Offset = Node -> getOffset ( ) ;`. * The next statement could be a call" LLVM,RISCV,2292,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return Result;` This statement returns the `Result` SDValue, which is the result of the `getTargetBlockAddress` method called on the `DAG` object, with the `BA` BlockAddress, `PtrVT` pointer type, and `Offset` offset as arguments." LLVM,RISCV,2293,"The next statement after the given code snippet is: `return Result;`" LLVM,RISCV,2294,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `unsigned Reg = addLiveIn(MF, ArgRegs[I], RC);` This statement adds a live-in register to the machine function `MF` for the argument register `ArgRegs[I]`. The register class `RC` is used to determine the type of the register. The `addLiveIn` function is called with the chain `Chain`, the data layout `DL`, the register `ArgRegs[I]`, and the register class `RC`. The return value of `addLiveIn` is assigned to the variable" LLVM,RISCV,2295,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be the implementation of the `lowerFRAMEADDR` function, which is a member function of the `TargetLowering` class. The function takes two arguments: `Op`, which is an `SDValue` object, and `DAG`, which is a reference to a `SelectionDAG` object. The function is expected to perform some lowering operation on the `Op` object, which is likely to involve manipulating the frame address of the function. The `DAG` object is used to represent the data flow graph of the program, and" LLVM,RISCV,2296,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return getAddrPIC(Op, DAG);` This statement returns the result of the `getAddrPIC` function, which is called with the `Op` and `DAG` arguments. The `getAddrPIC` function is not defined in the code snippet you provided, so it is not possible to determine what it does or what its return value will be." LLVM,RISCV,2297,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet without knowing the context and the purpose of the code. However, based on the syntax and the functions used, it appears to be related to the generation of machine code for a specific architecture. The `DAG` object is being used to generate a target global address, and the `getTargetGlobalAddress` function is being called with the `G` object, which is likely a global variable or a function, and the `SDLoc` object, which is a location in the source code. The `getPointerTy` function is being used to get the" LLVM,RISCV,2298,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `DAG` class and the values of the variables `TGAHi`, `TGALo`, and `Offset`. However, based on the names of the variables and the methods being called, it appears that this code is trying to create a node in a directed acyclic graph (DAG) representing a memory access operation. The `getNode` method is being called with a string literal as the first argument, which is likely the name of the node being created. The second" LLVM,RISCV,2299,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be a call to the `getNode` method of the `DAG` object, passing in the `TGAHi` and `TGALo` values as arguments. The `getNode` method is used to retrieve a node from the DAG, and it is likely that the code is trying to retrieve a node that represents the high and low parts of a global address. The `` and `` placeholders in the code snippet suggest that the code is using literal values to represent the high and low parts" LLVM,RISCV,2300,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet without knowing the context and the specific implementation of the `DAG` and `JT` classes. However, based on the names of the methods and variables, it appears that this code is trying to retrieve a jump table from the `DAG` object using the index of the `JT` object. The `getTargetJumpTable` method is likely returning a `SDValue` object that represents the jump table. Without more information, it is not possible to provide a more specific answer. If you have any additional context or details about the" LLVM,RISCV,2301,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific values of the `Op` and `DAG` variables, as well as the implementation of the `lower` functions. However, based on the code snippet provided, it is likely that the next statement will be one of the following: * `return lowerRETURNADDR(Op, DAG);` * `return lowerSELECT_CC(Op, DAG);` * `return lowerGlobalAddress(Op, DAG);` * `return lowerGlobalTLSAddress(cast`, `DL`, ``, `RetOps`." LLVM,RISCV,2304,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the code depends on the specific values of the variables and the implementation of the `getSimpleValueType` and `isRV64` methods. However, based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the next statement will be a call to the `setReturnAddressIsTaken` method of the `MFI` object, passing in the value `true` as an argument. This is because the code checks the value of the `RA` variable, which is set to the result of the `" LLVM,RISCV,2305,"The code snippet you provided is a part of a function called `lowerRETURNADDR` that is a member of a class called `TargetLowering`. The function takes two arguments: `Op` and `DAG`. The first line of the function is an assertion statement that checks if the value of `Op.getOperand()` is equal to ``. If the assertion fails, the function will terminate with an error message. The second line of the function is a call to the `cast` function, which is a member of the" LLVM,RISCV,2306,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet without knowing the context and the specific implementation of the `SDValue` class. However, based on the syntax and the method names used, it appears that the code is creating a new `SDValue` object called `Cond` and initializing it with the result of a call to the `getNode` method of the `DAG` object. The `getNode` method takes several arguments, including a string literal, a data layout object, a type, and three operands. It is likely that the `getNode` method creates a new node" LLVM,RISCV,2307,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `unsigned sp = Subtarget . isRV64 ( ) ? : ;` This statement is assigning the value of the `sp` variable based on the result of the `isRV64()` method of the `Subtarget` object. If the result is `true`, the value of `sp` is set to ``. Otherwise, it is set to ``." LLVM,RISCV,2308,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be: `MF.getInfoFunctionInfo>()->setManipulatesSP(true);` This statement is setting the `manipulatesSP` flag to `true` in the `ISA_LIT` function info object, which is part of the `MachineFunction` object. The `manipulatesSP` flag indicates that the function manipulates the stack pointer, which is a common operation in many programming languages. The `lowerSTACKSAVE` function is responsible" LLVM,RISCV,2309,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return DAG . getCopyFromReg ( Op . getOperand ( ) , SDLoc ( Op ) , sp , Op . getValueType ( ) ) ;` This statement is a call to the `getCopyFromReg` method of the `DAG` object, which returns a `Value` object representing the result of the copy operation. The `Op` object is passed as an argument to `getCopyFromReg`, along with the operand number, the source register, and the value type. The `" LLVM,RISCV,2310,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be a return statement, as the code snippet appears to be a function that is returning a value. The return statement is likely to be the last statement in the function, and it is returning a value of type `DAG` that is constructed using the `getLoad` method of the `DAG` class. The `getLoad` method takes several arguments, including the type of the value being loaded, the data layout, the chain of instructions, and the machine pointer information. The `getLoad` method returns a new `DAG` node that represents the loaded value" LLVM,RISCV,2311,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet without knowing the specific implementation of the `getInfo` and `getPointerTy` methods, as well as the types of the `Op` object and its operands. However, based on the names of the methods and the variables, it is likely that the next statement will be related to the creation or manipulation of a function or a pointer. Here are a few possibilities: * `FuncInfo->setPointerTy(PtrVT);` * `FuncInfo->setChain(Chain);` * `FuncInfo->setAddr(" LLVM,RISCV,2312,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `SDLoc` and `SDValue` classes, as well as the values of the variables `DL`, `Op`, `DAG`, `FuncInfo`, and `PtrVT`. However, based on the syntax and the names of the variables, it appears that the next statement is likely to be a call to the `getFrameIndex` method of the `FuncInfo` object, passing in the result of the `getVarArgsFrameIndex` method as an argument. The `" LLVM,RISCV,2313,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `ArgTy = FType -> getParamType ( Ins [ i ] . getOrigArgIndex ( ) ) ;` This is because the `else if` clause is executed when `Ins[i].isOrigArg()` is true, and the `getOrigArgIndex()` method is called on the `Ins[i]` object to get the original argument index. The `getParamType()` method is then called on the `FType` object with the original argument index as an argument, and the result is assigned to `Arg" LLVM,RISCV,2314,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific values of the variables and the behavior of the functions being called. However, based on the context and the code structure, it appears that the next statement is likely to be a call to the `CC_` function, which is a part of the LLVM code generation framework. The `CC_` function is used to generate code for a specific instruction set architecture (ISA) and is typically called by the LLVM code generator to generate code for" LLVM,RISCV,2315,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty because it depends on the specific values of the variables and the implementation of the `Outs` array. However, based on the code snippet, it appears that the next statement will be: `MVT ArgVT = Outs[i].VT;` This is because the loop is currently iterating over the `Outs` array, and the next element to be processed is at index `i`. The statement `MVT ArgVT = Outs[i].VT;` assigns the value of" LLVM,RISCV,2316,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific inputs and the behavior of the functions called. However, based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the next statement will be a call to the `report_fatal_error` function if the `isPositionIndependent` function returns `true` or if the `Subtarget` is 64-bit. If neither of these conditions is met, the next statement will likely be a call to the `getTargetBlockAddress` function." LLVM,RISCV,2317,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific values of the variables and the behavior of the functions being called. However, based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the next statement will be a call to the `getMachineNode` function, passing in the `GAHi` and `GALo` values as arguments. The `getMachineNode` function is likely to return a machine node representing the symbol `Sym`, which will be used to create a machine node for the high and low parts of the symbol." LLVM,RISCV,2318,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `getTargetExternalSymbol` method and the values of the variables `Sym`, `Ty`, and ``. However, based on the names of the variables and the method being called, it is likely that the next statement will involve the creation of a new symbol or the retrieval of an existing symbol from a symbol table." LLVM,RISCV,2319,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `int Offset = - ( XLenInBytes * );` This statement is inside the while loop, and it is executed repeatedly as long as the condition `Depth --` is true. The statement assigns the value `- (XLenInBytes * )` to the variable `Offset`. The value of `XLenInBytes` is not specified in the code snippet, but it is likely to be a constant or a variable that represents the length of a data structure in bytes. The value of" LLVM,RISCV,2320,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be: `FrameAddr = DAG.getCopyFromReg(DAG.getEntryNode(), DL, FrameReg, VT);` This is because the code is currently at the end of the `while` loop, and the next statement is the one that is executed after the loop is finished. The `FrameAddr` variable is assigned the result of the `DAG.getCopyFromReg()` function, which is a copy of the value stored in the frame register. The function takes several arguments, including the entry node of the" LLVM,RISCV,2321,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific values of the variables and the behavior of the functions being called. However, based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the next statement will be a call to the `report_fatal_error` function, which will terminate the program with an error message. The `report_fatal_error` function is called with a string literal as its argument, which is likely to be the error message that will be displayed to the user. The string literal is enclosed in angle brackets (`< >`)," LLVM,RISCV,2322,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `lower` function and the values of the `Op` and `DAG` variables. However, based on the pattern of the code snippet, it appears that the next statement will be a `case` statement with a string literal as the condition, and the `lower` function will be called with the `Op` and `DAG` variables as arguments." LLVM,RISCV,2323,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific values of the variables and the implementation of the functions being called. However, based on the pattern of the code, it is likely that the next statement will be another case statement with a similar structure, such as: case : return lowerBlockAddress ( Op , DAG ) ; This is because the code appears to be using a series of case statements to handle different types of operations, and the next statement is likely to be another case statement handling a different type of operation." LLVM,RISCV,2324,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be the assignment of the `Glue` variable, which is a `SDValue` representing the glue code for the return value. The `Glue` variable is assigned the result of the `DAG.getCopyToReg()` method, which is used to copy the return value to a register. The `DAG.getCopyToReg()` method takes several arguments, including the `Chain` variable, which is the current chain of instructions, the `DL` variable, which is the debug location, the `RegLo` and `Reg" LLVM,RISCV,2325,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `unsigned Reg = MF.addLiveIn(RI.getRARegister(), getRegClassFor(XLenVT));` This statement adds a live-in register to the machine function `MF` for the return address register `RI.getRARegister()` with the register class `getRegClassFor(XLenVT)`. The `addLiveIn` method is called on the `MachineFunction` object `MF`, and it takes two arguments: the register number and the register class. The register number is obtained" LLVM,RISCV,2326,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific input and the behavior of the `DAG` object. However, based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the next statement will be: `Val = DAG.getNode(, DL, LocVT, Val);` This statement is likely to be executed because the `case` statement above it is checking for the `CCValAssign` value, and the `break` statement is not executed until the end of the `case` block. Therefore" LLVM,RISCV,2327,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `Val = DAG.getNode(, DL, LocVT, Val);` This statement is inside the `case CCValAssign::BCvt` block, which means that the `CCValAssign` enum value is `BCvt`. The `getNode` method is called on the `DAG` object with the following arguments: * ``: This is a string literal that represents the name of the node. * `DL`: This is the data layout object that describes" LLVM,RISCV,2328,"Based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the next statement will be: `setOperationAction(, , Legal);` This is because the previous statement ends with a closing brace `}`, which indicates the end of an `if` statement. The next statement is likely to be a new `setOperationAction` call, which is consistent with the pattern of the previous statements in the code snippet." LLVM,RISCV,2329,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific input and the behavior of the functions being called. However, based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the next statement will be a call to the `DAG.getNode` function, passing in the `ValVT` variable as the first argument, the `DL` variable as the second argument, and the `Val` variable as the third argument. The fourth argument is not provided, so it will likely be a default value or a value derived from the other arguments. The `DAG" LLVM,RISCV,2330,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `MachineFunction` and `Value` classes, as well as the input data. However, based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the next statement will be: ``` Val = RegInfo.createVirtualRegister(LocVT, ValVT); ``` This statement creates a new virtual register with the type `LocVT` and the value `ValVT`, and assigns it to the variable `Val`. The `createVirtualRegister` method is called on the" LLVM,RISCV,2331,"The next statement is: `ArgTy = FType->getParamType(Ins[i].getOrigArgIndex());`" LLVM,RISCV,2332,"Based on the code snippet provided, it is difficult to predict the next statement with certainty. However, based on the context and the structure of the code, it is likely that the next statement will be a call to a function that takes the arguments `ArgVT`, `ArgFlags`, `ABI`, `CCInfo`, and `OrigTy` as inputs. The function call is likely to be a member function of the `MF` object, which is an instance of a class that has a method called `getDataLayout`. The method `getDataLayout` is likely to return an object of" LLVM,RISCV,2333,"This code snippet appears to be a part of a function that is checking the validity of a set of arguments passed to a function. The function is using a loop to iterate over the arguments, and for each argument, it is checking whether the argument is valid or not. The code is using the `CC_` function to check the validity of each argument. This function appears to be a part of a larger library or framework, and it is not clear what the specific implementation of this function is. However, based on the name of the function, it seems to be related to checking" LLVM,RISCV,2334,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `State` class and the values of the variables used in the code. However, based on the context and the code structure, it appears that the next statement is likely to be a call to the `addLoc` method of the `State` class, passing in a `CCValAssign` object as an argument. The `CCValAssign` object is likely to be created using the `getReg` method of the `CCValAssign` class, passing in the `Reg" LLVM,RISCV,2335,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `if (LocVT == || LocVT == ) {` This is because the previous `if` statement was not executed, and the `LocVT` variable is equal to ``. Therefore, the next `if` statement that checks if `LocVT` is equal to `` or `` will be executed." LLVM,RISCV,2336,"Based on the code snippet you provided, it appears to be a part of a function that is handling the allocation of registers and memory for a compiler. The function is checking the type of the location (LocVT) and allocating registers or memory accordingly. The next statement of the code snippet you provided is: if (LocVT == || LocVT == ) { unsigned Offset4 = State.AllocateStack(, ); State.addLoc(CCValAssign" LLVM,RISCV,2337,"Based on the code snippet you provided, it is difficult to predict the next statement with certainty. However, based on the context and the information available, it is likely that the next statement will be a case statement for one of the opcodes that are handled by the `ComputeNumSignBitsForTargetNode` function. The function appears to be part of a compiler or interpreter, and it is responsible for computing the number of sign bits required for a target node in the generated code. The function takes an `SDValue` object, a `const APInt&` object, a `const SelectionDAG" LLVM,RISCV,2338,"Based on the code snippet you provided, it appears that the next statement after the `switch` statement will be the `case CCValAssign::Full` block. The `switch` statement is checking the value returned by `VA.getLocInfo()` and branching to different blocks of code based on that value. The `default` block is executed if the value returned by `VA.getLocInfo()` does not match any of the `case` statements. In this case, the `default` block is calling `llvm_unreachable()`, which is a function that is designed to" LLVM,RISCV,2339,"The next statement after the `break` statement in the `CCValAssign::BCvt` case is the `Val = DAG.getNode(, DL, LocVT, Val)` statement." LLVM,RISCV,2340,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `DAG` class and the values of the variables used in the code. However, based on the syntax and the fact that the `getNode` method is being called on the `DAG` object, it is likely that the next statement will be a call to a method on the `SDValue` object returned by the `getNode` method. Some possible next statements could be: * `NewOp1.getOperand(0)`: This would retrieve the first" LLVM,RISCV,2341,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `DAG` class and the values of the variables used in the code. However, based on the syntax and the fact that the `getNode` method is being called on the `DAG` object, it is likely that the next statement will be a call to a method on the `SDValue` object returned by the `getNode` method. Some possible next statements could be: * `NewOp1.getOperand(0)`: This would retrieve the first" LLVM,RISCV,2342,"This code snippet appears to be part of a larger function that is generating machine code for a target architecture. The code is using a number of variables and functions that are not defined in the snippet, so it is difficult to provide a definitive answer to your question. However, based on the code that is provided, it appears that the next statement will be to call the `TII.loadRegFromStackSlot` function, which is likely to load a value from a stack slot into a register." LLVM,RISCV,2343,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific input and the behavior of the `emitReadCycleWidePseudo`, `emitSelectPseudo`, `emitBuildPairF64Pseudo`, and `emitSplitF64Pseudo` functions. However, based on the structure of the code, it appears that the next statement will be one of the following: * `return emitReadCycleWidePseudo(MI, BB)` * `return emitSelectPseudo(MI, BB" LLVM,RISCV,2344,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `BuildMI(TailMBB, InsertionPoint, SelectMBBI->getDebugLoc(), TII.get(), SelectMBBI->getOperand().getReg())` This statement is building a machine instruction using the `BuildMI` function, which is a member of the `MachineInstr` class. The function takes several arguments, including the machine basic block (`TailMBB`), the insertion point (`InsertionPoint`), the debug location (`SelectMBBI->" LLVM,RISCV,2345,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be: `SelectDebugValues . push_back ( & * SequenceMBBI ) ;` This is because the code is iterating over the instructions in a basic block, and for each instruction, it is checking if it is a debug instruction or a select pseudo instruction. If it is a select pseudo instruction, it is pushing the instruction onto the `SelectDebugValues` vector. The `push_back` method is used to add an element to the end of the vector." LLVM,RISCV,2346,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty because it depends on the specific values of the variables and the behavior of the functions called. However, based on the code snippet, it appears that the next statement will be a call to the `emitSplitF64Pseudo` function, which is defined in the `MachineInstr` class. This function is responsible for splitting a 64-bit floating-point value into two 32-bit values, and it is called when the `MachineInstr` object is created. The `emitSplitF64" LLVM,RISCV,2347,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `case 'A' :`" LLVM,RISCV,2348,"The next statement after the `switch` block would be the `default` case, which would return `C_Unknown`." LLVM,RISCV,2349,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `TargetLowering` class and the `getExceptionPointerRegister` method. However, based on the name of the method and the parameters it takes, it is likely that the next statement will be related to the handling of exceptions and the retrieval of a pointer to the exception handling routine. Here are a few possibilities for what the next statement could be: 1. A call to a function that retrieves the address of the exception handling routine, such as `getExceptionHandlerAddress`" LLVM,RISCV,2350,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be a return statement, as the function name `getExceptionSelectorRegister` suggests that it is intended to return a value. The return value is likely to be a register number, as the function name suggests that it is related to exception handling and registers are commonly used in this context. The specific value returned will depend on the implementation of the function and the input parameters, but it is likely to be a constant value or a register number that is stored in the `TargetLowering` object." LLVM,RISCV,2351,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific values of the string literals and the context in which the code is being executed. However, based on the syntax and structure of the code, it is likely that the next statement will be a `return` statement, as the previous `case` statements all end with a `return` statement. It is also possible that the next statement could be a `break` statement, which would cause the program to exit the `switch` block and continue executing the code following the `switch` statement. However, without" LLVM,RISCV,2352,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific values of the string literals and the control flow of the program. However, based on the syntax and structure of the code, it appears to be a switch statement with multiple cases, each of which returns a different string literal. The next statement after the switch statement is the `llvm_unreachable` function, which is a built-in function in LLVM that is used to indicate that a particular code path is unreachable. It is possible that the next statement after the `llvm_" LLVM,RISCV,2353,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific values of the string literals and the return values of the functions. However, based on the syntax and structure of the code, it appears that the code is defining a function that takes a string literal as an argument and returns a string literal based on the value of the argument. The function appears to be using a series of `case` statements to match the value of the argument string literal to a specific return value. Each `case` statement is checking the value of the argument string literal against a specific string literal" LLVM,RISCV,2354,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be: `Info.memVT = (PtrTy->getElementType());` This is because the code is using the `PointerType` object `PtrTy` to get the element type of the pointer, and then using that type to construct a string literal for the `memVT` field of the `Info` object. The `` placeholder is likely to be replaced with a string literal that represents the name of the element type." LLVM,RISCV,2355,"The next statement after the code snippet you provided is: `return ( VT == && Subtarget . hasStdExtF ( ) ) || ( VT == && Subtarget . hasStdExtD ( ) ) ;` This statement is a return statement that returns a boolean value indicating whether the current target platform supports the `std::ext::f` or `std::ext::d` extension. The `VT` variable is a string literal that represents the current target platform, and the `Subtarget` variable is an object" LLVM,RISCV,2356,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific values of the variables and the behavior of the functions called. However, based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the next statement will be a call to the `isLegalAddImmediate` function, as the code checks whether the result of shifting `C1Int` by `C2` is a legal add immediate value. If the result is not a legal add immediate value, the code will return `false`. If the result is a legal add immediate value, the code will return `true`." LLVM,RISCV,2357,"Based on the code snippet you provided, it appears to be related to the LLVM compiler infrastructure. The code is checking if a constraint is a specific length and then checking the value of a constant. The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be a case statement or a series of if statements that check the value of the constant and perform different actions based on that value. Without more context, it is difficult to provide a more specific prediction." LLVM,RISCV,2358,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `MFI.CreateFixedObject(XLenInBytes, VaArgOffset, true)` This statement creates a fixed object in the machine frame info (MFI) with a size of `XLenInBytes` and an offset of `VaArgOffset`. The `true` argument indicates that the object is a variable argument." LLVM,RISCV,2359,"The next statement in the code snippet is: Addr = getStaticTLSAddr(N, DAG, true);" LLVM,RISCV,2360,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `RetOps.push_back(DAG.getRegister(RegHi, ));` This statement adds the register `RegHi` to the `RetOps` vector, which is a vector of `SDValue` objects. The `SDValue` object is created by calling the `getRegister` method of the `DAG` object, passing in the `RegHi` register and the string literal `` as arguments. The `push_back` method of the `RetOps`" LLVM,RISCV,2361,"Based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the next statement will be: RetOpc = ; This is because the code is checking the value of the ""Kind"" string, which is obtained from the function attribute , and based on that value, it is setting the ""RetOpc"" variable to a specific value. The next statement is likely to be an assignment to the ""RetOpc"" variable, which is what the code snippet suggests." LLVM,RISCV,2362,"It's difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific inputs and the behavior of the `customLegalizeToWOp` and `getNode` functions. However, based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the next statement will be a `case` statement, possibly with a similar structure to the previous `case` statements. The code snippet is part of a switch statement that appears to be handling different cases for legalizing instructions for a specific target architecture. The `customLegalizeToWOp` function is called to legalize the instruction" LLVM,RISCV,2363,"Based on the code snippet you provided, it appears to be a part of a larger function that is creating a fixed object and assigning it to a variable. The next statement in the code snippet is: `Val = DAG.getNode(FIN, PtrVT);` This line of code is creating a new node in the DAG (Directed Acyclic Graph) using the `FIN` value as the input, and the `PtrVT` value as the type of the node. The resulting node is then assigned to the `Val` variable." LLVM,RISCV,2364,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `RC = & ;` This is because the `switch` statement is checking the value of `LocVT . getSimpleVT ( ) . SimpleTy`, which is an enumeration value representing the type of the location. The `default` case is reached if the value is not one of the expected values, and `llvm_unreachable` is called to indicate that this is an unexpected situation. The other cases are for specific values of `LocVT . getSimpleVT ( ) . SimpleTy`," LLVM,RISCV,2365,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet without knowing the context and the values of the variables involved. However, based on the code snippet provided, it appears to be a part of a function that is handling a switch statement. The code snippet is checking the value of a variable called `VA` and based on that value, it is setting the value of a variable called `RC` to a specific value. It is then creating a virtual register using the `RegInfo` class and adding a live-in register to it. After that, it is creating a copy of the value of the" LLVM,RISCV,2366,"The code snippet is using the C++ standard library and the LLVM library. It appears to be working with a machine function (MF) and a subtarget (STI) in the context of a register allocation algorithm. The code is declaring two constants: `F` and `STI`. `F` is a reference to a function, and `STI` is a reference to a subtarget. The subtarget is being retrieved from the machine function using the `getSubtarget` method. The code is then checking if any of the registers in the `Regs` vector satisfy a certain" LLVM,RISCV,2367,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be: `F.getContext().diagnose(DiagnosticInfoUnsupported{...});` This is because the code snippet is checking if any of the registers in the `Regs` vector are reserved by the user, and if so, it is calling the `diagnose` method on the `F.getContext()` object to report an unsupported error. The `DiagnosticInfoUnsupported` class is likely to be used to provide more information about the unsupported feature or operation that is being attempted." LLVM,RISCV,2368,"The next statement of the code snippet is: `State.addLoc(CCValAssign::getReg(ValNo, ValVT, Reg, LocVT, LocInfo));`" LLVM,RISCV,2369,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the code depends on the specific implementation of the `Subtarget` class and the values of the `ISA_LIT` and `Subtarget` variables. However, based on the syntax and the fact that the `getSubtarget` method is declared as `const`, it is likely that the next statement will be a return statement that returns a reference to the `Subtarget` object." LLVM,RISCV,2370,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `Subtarget` class and the context in which this code is being executed. However, based on the syntax and the fact that the `Subtarget` class is being returned, it is likely that the next statement after this code snippet will be the return statement of the method or function that contains this code." LLVM,RISCV,2371,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `InVals.push_back(ArgValue);` This statement adds the value of `ArgValue` to the end of the `InVals` vector. The `InVals` vector is a vector of `SDValue` objects, and it is used to store the input values for the function being analyzed. The `ArgValue` variable is a `SDValue` object that represents the value of the current argument being analyzed. The `push_back` method is used to add the `ArgValue` object to the end of the" LLVM,RISCV,2372,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet without knowing the context and the purpose of the code. However, based on the code snippet provided, it appears to be related to the handling of global values and offsets in a program. The code defines a constant pointer to a global value called `GV`, and an integer offset called `Offset`. It also defines a variable called `XLenVT` that appears to be related to the size of the global value. The code then checks if the program is position-independent or if the subtarget is 64-bit. If either" LLVM,RISCV,2373,"Based on the code snippet you provided, it appears to be related to the LLVM compiler infrastructure. The code is initializing a `SmallVector` called `RVLocs` with a list of `CCValAssign` objects, which represent register locations for the return values of a function. The code then iterates over the `RVLocs` vector and for each element, it checks if the register location is a floating-point register and if the value to be returned is also a floating-point value. If both conditions are true, the code splits the floating-point value into" LLVM,RISCV,2374,The next statement after `return true ;` would be the end of the function or method. LLVM,RISCV,2375,The next statement after `return true ;` would be the end of the function or method. LLVM,RISCV,2376,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it appears to be part of a larger program and the context is not provided. However, based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the next statement could be a call to the `BuildMI` function, which is not defined in the code snippet provided. The `BuildMI` function appears to take several arguments, including a pointer to a `MachineBasicBlock` object, a `MachineInstr` object, a `DebugLoc` object, and a string literal. The function returns a `MachineInstr` object," LLVM,RISCV,2377,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet without knowing the specific values of the variables and the implementation of the functions being called. However, based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the next statement will be a call to the `getMoveF64FrameIndex` method of the `MachineFunctionInfo` class, passing in the `DstRC` variable as an argument. This method is likely to return an integer value that represents the frame index of the destination register for a move operation." LLVM,RISCV,2378,"This code snippet appears to be part of a function that is generating machine code for a specific target architecture. The function is using a number of variables and functions to generate the code, including: * `MF`: A `MachineFunction` object, which represents the current machine function being generated. * `BB`: A `BasicBlock` object, which represents the current basic block being generated. * `MI`: A `MachineInstr` object, which represents the current machine instruction being generated. * `TII`: A `TargetInstrInfo` object, which provides information about the target architecture'" LLVM,RISCV,2379,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `MachineFunctionInfo` class and the `MachineMemOperand` class. However, based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the next statement may be related to the creation of a new `MachineMemOperand` object. The code snippet creates a new `MachineMemOperand` object by calling the `getMachineMemOperand` method of the `MachineFunctionInfo` class, passing in the `MachinePointerInfo` object and the `MachineMemOperand::MOLoad" LLVM,RISCV,2380,The next statement after the `if` statement in the code snippet you provided is `return false;`. LLVM,RISCV,2381,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `if (VT == && !Subtarget.hasStdExtF()) return false;` This statement checks if the value type (VT) is equal to a specific string literal () and if the subtarget does not have the standard extension for floating-point values (hasStdExtF()). If this condition is true, the function returns false." LLVM,RISCV,2382,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be a call to a function that generates code for the intrinsic instruction with the specified number. The function name is likely to be in the format `LowerINTRINSIC_WO_CHAIN_`, where `` is the number of the intrinsic instruction. For example, if the number of the intrinsic instruction is 123, the next statement of this code snippet is likely to be a call to the function `LowerINTRINSIC_WO_CHAIN_123`." LLVM,RISCV,2383,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be a call to a function that performs the actual lowering of the intrinsic instruction. The function name is not specified in the code snippet, but it is likely to be a member function of the `TargetLowering` class. The function will take the `Op` object and the `DAG` object as arguments, and it will use the `IntNo` variable to determine which intrinsic instruction to lower. The `IntNo` variable is the index of the intrinsic instruction in the `Op` object's operand list. The function" LLVM,RISCV,2384,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `SDValue NewOp0 = DAG.getNode(, DL, , Op0);` This line creates a new SDValue object called `NewOp0` by calling the `getNode` method of the `DAG` object with the following arguments: * `Op0`: The first operand of the `Op` SDValue object. * ``: The string literal ""fpconv"" (this is the name of the instruction being generated). *" LLVM,RISCV,2385,"Based on the code snippet provided, it appears to be a part of a function that is handling the legalization of instructions for a specific target architecture. The function is checking the type of the instruction and its operands, and based on that, it is generating new instructions to replace the original ones. The next statement of the code snippet is: Results.push_back(DAG.getNode(, DL, , FPConv)); This statement is adding a new node to the Results vector, which is a list of nodes that are" LLVM,RISCV,2386,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `if (IsCallerStructRet || IsCalleeStructRet) return false;` This statement checks if the caller or callee function has a struct return value, and if so, returns false. If neither the caller nor the callee has a struct return value, the function will continue to the next statement." LLVM,RISCV,2387,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `const uint32_t * CalleePreserved = TRI->getCallPreservedMask(MF, CalleeCC);`" LLVM,RISCV,2388,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific inputs and the behavior of the functions being called. However, based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the next statement will be: `return DAG.getNode(, DL, Ty, Addr, DAG.getConstant(Offset, DL, XLenVT));` This statement is likely to be executed if the `Offset` variable is not equal to ``. The `DAG.getNode()` function" LLVM,RISCV,2389,"Based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the next statement will be: `setOperationAction(, XLenVT, Custom);` This is because the previous statement sets the operation action for the `XLenVT` variable to `Expand`, and the next statement sets the operation action for the same variable to `Custom`." LLVM,RISCV,2390,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `if (ValVT == && !UseGPRForF32) Reg = State.AllocateReg(ArgFPR32s, ArgFPR64s);` This statement checks if the value type `ValVT` is equal to the string literal `` and if the `UseGPRForF32` flag is not set. If both conditions are true, the `Reg` variable is assigned the result of calling the `AllocateReg` method on the" LLVM,RISCV,2391,"It's difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific values of the variables and the behavior of the functions being called. However, based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the next statement will be a call to the `BuildMI` function, passing in the `LoopMBB` object, the `DL` object, the result of calling `TII->get()` with a string literal, and the `HiReg` object. The `BuildMI` function is likely to construct a new machine instruction based on these inputs, and the next statement will likely" LLVM,RISCV,2392,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `SelectMBBI = Next;`" LLVM,RISCV,2393,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `int C1Cost = ( C1Int , Ty . getSizeInBits ( ) , Subtarget . is64Bit ( ) ) ;` This statement calculates the cost of the first operand `C1Int` and stores it in the variable `C1Cost`. The cost is calculated based on the size of the operand and whether the target is 64-bit or not." LLVM,RISCV,2394,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be a comparison between the `CallerPreserved` and `CalleePreserved` masks, as they are both being used to determine the preserved registers for the caller and callee functions. The code is checking if the preserved registers are the same for both functions, and if not, it is returning `false`." LLVM,RISCV,2395,"Based on the code snippet provided, it appears to be a part of a function that is handling the legalization of instructions for a specific target architecture. The function appears to be handling the legalization of instructions that involve floating-point operations. The next statement of the code snippet is likely to be a case statement that handles the legalization of a specific instruction or group of instructions. The case statement will likely contain a series of assertions that check the properties of the instruction being legalized, such as its opcode, operands, and value type. The case statement will also contain code that performs the legalization of the" LLVM,RISCV,2396,"Based on the code snippet provided, it is difficult to predict the next statement with certainty. However, based on the context and the patterns in the code, it is likely that the next statement will be another case statement or a default statement. The code appears to be implementing a switch statement with multiple cases, and each case is handling a specific type of operation. The cases are checking the value type of the operand and the opcode of the operation, and then performing some legalization operations on the operand. Therefore, the next statement is likely to be another case statement or a default statement that handles" LLVM,RISCV,2397,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific input and the behavior of the `llvm_unreachable` function. However, based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the `llvm_unreachable` function is being called with a string literal as an argument. The `llvm_unreachable` function is a built-in function in LLVM that is used to indicate that a particular code path is unreachable. When this function is called, it will terminate the program and print an error message" LLVM,RISCV,2398,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `unsigned VReg = RegInfo . createVirtualRegister ( RC ) ;` This statement creates a new virtual register using the register class `RC` and assigns it to the variable `VReg`. The `createVirtualRegister` method is called on the `MachineRegisterInfo` object `RegInfo`, which is a member of the `MachineFunction` object `MF`. The `MachineRegisterInfo` object is used to manage the allocation of registers for the machine function." LLVM,RISCV,2399,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `State.addLoc(It);`" LLVM,RISCV,2400,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `unsigned Reg = State . AllocateReg ( ArgGPRs ) ;` This statement allocates a register from the `ArgGPRs` register class, and assigns it to the `Reg` variable." LLVM,RISCV,2401,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `MachineFunction` class and the behavior of the `CreateMachineBasicBlock` and `insert` methods. However, based on the code provided, it appears that the next statement will be a call to the `transferSuccessorsAndUpdatePHIs` method of the `MachineBasicBlock` class, passing in `HeadMBB` and `TailMBB` as arguments. This method is likely to update the control flow graph of the machine function, transferring the successors of `Head" LLVM,RISCV,2402,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `MachineFunction` class and the behavior of the `CreateMachineBasicBlock` and `insert` methods. However, based on the code provided, it appears that the next statement will be the creation of a new `MachineBasicBlock` object and its insertion into the `MachineFunction` object. The code creates a new `MachineBasicBlock` object by calling the `CreateMachineBasicBlock` method on the `MachineFunction` object, passing in the `LLVM_BB` object" LLVM,RISCV,2403,The next statement after the `break` statement will be the `case` statement with the string literal ``. LLVM,RISCV,2404,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `SDValue Glue;` This line declares a new variable `Glue` of type `SDValue`, which is a type defined in the LLVM IR. The variable `Glue` is not used in the code snippet you provided, so it is likely that it is used in a subsequent line of code that you did not include in your question." LLVM,RISCV,2405,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `InVals.push_back(DAG.getLoad(VA.getValVT(), DL, Chain, ArgValue, MachinePointerInfo()));` This statement is adding a new element to the `InVals` vector, which is a vector of `SDValue` objects. The element being added is the result of a `getLoad` operation on the `DAG` object, which is a `DataLayout` object. The `getLoad` operation is loading a value of the type specified by `VA.getVal" LLVM,RISCV,2406,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `DAG` and `RetOps` classes, as well as the values of the variables `DL`, `Val`, and `Flag`. However, based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the next statement will be a call to the `getRegister` method of the `DAG` class, passing in the value of `VA.getLocReg()` as the first argument, and the value of `VA.getLocVT()` as the second argument. The return" LLVM,RISCV,2407,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be: `Flag = DAG.getMachineFunction()->getReturn().getReturnValue();`. This is because the code is currently iterating over the return value locations (`RVLocs`) and retrieving the corresponding values from `OutVals`. The next step is likely to be to retrieve the return value itself, which is stored in the `Return` property of the machine function. The `getReturnValue()` method is then called on this object to retrieve the actual return value." LLVM,RISCV,2408,"Based on the code snippet you provided, it appears to be a part of a larger program that is setting up a machine learning model. The specifics of the code are not important for the purpose of this exercise, but the general structure and syntax are similar to that of a programming language. The next statement in the code snippet you provided is: setOperationAction(, , Expand) This statement is setting the operation action for a specific operation, where represents a string literal (a string constant) and , e = Outs.size(); i != e; ++i) {` This is a for loop that iterates over the elements of the `Outs` vector, starting from the `NUM_LIT` index and ending at the `e` index (which is the size of the `Outs` vector). The loop variable `i` is used to access each element of the `Outs` vector in turn." LLVM,RISCV,2414,"Based on the code snippet provided, it is difficult to predict the next statement with certainty. However, based on the context and the code that has been provided, it is likely that the next statement will be a continuation of the `for` loop that is currently being executed. The `for` loop is iterating over the `Outs` vector, and the current iteration is at index `i`. The next statement is likely to be the body of the loop, which will be executed for each element in the `Outs` vector. The body of the loop is not provided in the code snippet, so" LLVM,RISCV,2415,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `if ( ValVT . isScalarInteger ( ) && ( ArgFlags . isSplit ( ) || ! PendingLocs . empty ( ) ) ) {`" LLVM,RISCV,2416,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `TargetLowering` class and the values of the input parameters. However, based on the name of the method and the parameters, it is likely that the next statement will be a switch statement that selects the appropriate number of registers to use for the specified calling convention and vector type. Here is an example of what the next statement might look like: ``` switch (CC) { case CallingConv::C: return 0; case CallingCon" LLVM,RISCV,2417,"The next statement after the `if` block will be: ``` return TargetLowering :: getRegisterTypeForCallingConv ( Context , CC , VT ) ; ``` This is because the `if` block only contains a `return` statement, and the `else` block is empty. Therefore, the next statement after the `if` block will be the statement after the `if` block, which is the `return` statement." LLVM,RISCV,2418,"The next statement after the `if` block will be: ``` return TargetLowering :: getRegisterTypeForCallingConv ( Context , CC , VT ) ; ``` This is because the `if` block only contains a `return` statement, and the `else` block is empty. Therefore, the next statement after the `if` block will be the statement after the `if` block, which is the `return` statement." LLVM,RISCV,2419,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return EVT::getVectorVT(Context, , VT.getVectorElementCount());` This statement returns a vector type with the same element type as the input vector type `VT`, and with the same number of elements as `VT`. The `EVT::getVectorVT` function is used to create the vector type, and the `Context` parameter is passed as the first argument to specify the context in which the vector type is being created. The `` parameter is used" LLVM,RISCV,2420,"The next statement after the code snippet you provided is likely to be the evaluation of the `&&` operator. The `&&` operator is a logical AND operator that evaluates its left-hand side and right-hand side operands and returns a boolean value indicating whether both operands are true. In this case, the left-hand side operand is `Subtarget.hasStdExtZbb()` and the right-hand side operand is `!isa(Y)`. Therefore, the next statement is likely to be the evaluation of the `Subtarget.hasSt" LLVM,RISCV,2421,The next statement after the `if` statement in the code snippet you provided is `return false;`. LLVM,RISCV,2422,"Based on the code snippet, it appears that the function `isLegalElementTypeForRVV` is checking whether a given type is a legal element type for a RISC-V vector instruction. The function takes a `Type*` argument, which is a pointer to a `Type` object, and returns a `bool` indicating whether the type is a legal element type. The function first checks if the type is a pointer type, and if so, returns `true`. This suggests that pointer types are legal element types for RISC-V vector instructions. Next, the function checks if" LLVM,RISCV,2423,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `if (ScalarTy->isIntegerTy()) return Subtarget.hasVInstructionsI64();` This is because the previous `if` statement evaluated to `false`, and the next `if` statement that is executed is the one that checks if `ScalarTy` is an integer type with a specific bit width. If this condition is true, the function returns `true`, otherwise it falls through to the next `if` statement." LLVM,RISCV,2424,"This code snippet appears to be part of a larger program that is performing some kind of data transformation or manipulation. It is difficult to determine exactly what the code is doing without more context, but based on the variable names and the operations being performed, it appears to be related to floating-point arithmetic and bit manipulation. The code snippet is using a number of variables and functions that are not defined within the snippet itself, so it is likely that they are defined elsewhere in the program. Some of the variables that are used in the snippet include: * `Op`: This appears to be a variable that holds an" LLVM,RISCV,2425,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `SDValue Bitcast = DAG . getBitcast ( IntVT , FloatVal ) ;` This statement is a call to the `getBitcast` method of the `DAG` object, passing in the `IntVT` and `FloatVal` variables as arguments. The `getBitcast` method returns a new `SDValue` object that represents the result of the bitcast operation." LLVM,RISCV,2426,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific values of the constants and variables used in the code. However, based on the information provided, it appears that the code is defining a constant called `Table` and a variable called `Shift`. The `Table` constant is being defined as a bitwise OR of several values, each of which is a bitwise shift of a constant value by a certain number of bits. The number of bits to shift is determined by the value of the `NUM_LIT` constant, which is not specified in the code" LLVM,RISCV,2427,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `SDNode` class and the `DAG` class. However, based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the next statement will be a call to the `getNode` method of the `DAG` class, passing in the `SDValue` objects `RM`, `Chain`, and `SysRegNo` as arguments. The `getNode` method will then create a new `SDNode` object and return it as the result of the method call." LLVM,RISCV,2428,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific values of the variables and the behavior of the functions being called. However, based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the next statement will be a call to the `convertToScalableVector` function, which is used to convert a vector to a scalable vector. The function takes several arguments, including the vector to be converted, the pass-through value, the DAG, and the subtarget. The function returns a scalable vector that represents the input vector. It is also possible that the" LLVM,RISCV,2429,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific values of the variables and the behavior of the functions being called. However, based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the next statement will be a call to the `getNode` function of the `DAG` object, passing in the `RMValue` variable as the first argument, the `DL` variable as the second argument, the `XLenVT` variable as the third argument, and the result of the `getConstant` function of the `DAG` object as the fourth" LLVM,RISCV,2430,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific values of the variables and the behavior of the functions being called. However, based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the next statement will be a call to the `getNode` method of the `DAG` object, passing in the `Shifted` value as the first argument and the result of the `getConstant` method as the second argument. The `getConstant` method is called with the `Table` value as the first argument and the `DL` value as the second argument." LLVM,RISCV,2431,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be: `if (VT.isScalarInteger() && VT != XLenVT) {` This is because the code is checking the type of the operand `ScalarOp` and ensuring that it is a scalar integer type that is not equal to the target's XLenVT. If this condition is not met, the code will return an empty SDValue." LLVM,RISCV,2432,"The next statement of this code snippet is: Ops.push_back(&Op->getOperandUse()); Explanation: The code snippet is a part of a function that appears to be processing a list of instructions. The function is checking if a particular instruction, represented by the variable ""Op"", is a sinker instruction, and if it is, it is adding the operand use of that instruction to a list called ""Ops"". The placeholder is used to indicate that the operand use should be obtained from the """ LLVM,RISCV,2433,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet without knowing the specific values of the variables and the intended behavior of the code. However, based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the code is attempting to perform some kind of arithmetic operation on the values stored in the `N0` and `N1` variables, and is using the `dyn_cast` function to cast the values to a specific type. The `dyn_cast` function is used to cast a value to a specific type, and it returns a null pointer if the cast is not possible. In this case, the" LLVM,RISCV,2434,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `if (LMul > Subtarget.getMaxVLForFixedLengthVectors()) return false;`" LLVM,RISCV,2435,"The next statement after the `switch` statement is: `if (EltVT.getSizeInBits() > Subtarget.getMaxELENForFixedLengthVectors()) return false;` This statement checks if the size of the element vector type (EltVT) is greater than the maximum size of fixed-length vectors supported by the subtarget. If it is, the function returns `false`." LLVM,RISCV,2436,"Based on the code snippet you provided, it appears to be a loop that is iterating over a list of values and performing some operations on each value. The loop starts by initializing two variables, `i` and `e`, and then enters a loop that iterates over the values in the list. Within the loop, the code first asserts that the current value is a register location and has a specific type. It then checks if the value is a 64-bit floating point value and splits it into two 32-bit values. The code then gets the register location for the" LLVM,RISCV,2437,"The next statement after the `if` statement is the `return` statement. The `return` statement will return the value of `State.AllocateReg(ArgVRs)` if the condition `RC == & ` is true. If the condition is false, the `return` statement will return the value of `State.AllocateReg(ArgVRM2s)`." LLVM,RISCV,2438,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `FirstMaskArgument = preAssignMask(Ins);` This is because the `if` statement that follows the declaration of `FirstMaskArgument` checks if `Subtarget.hasStdExtV()` is true, and if so, assigns the result of `preAssignMask(Ins)` to `FirstMaskArgument`." LLVM,RISCV,2439,"This code snippet appears to be part of a function that is generating code for a target machine. It is using a library called LLVM to generate the code. The code is iterating over a list of instructions (represented by the `Ins` variable) and for each instruction, it is checking if it is a return instruction (`IsRet`) or an original argument instruction (`Ins[i].isOrigArg()`). If it is a return instruction, it is getting the return type of the function (`FType->getReturnType()`). If it is an original argument instruction, it is getting" LLVM,RISCV,2440,"This code snippet is part of a function that appears to be generating machine code for a specific architecture. The function is taking a set of input arguments and generating a sequence of instructions to perform a specific operation. The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be another instruction or a series of instructions that continue the operation being performed. It is difficult to predict exactly what the next statement will be without more context, but some possible options could include: * A load instruction to load a value from memory into a register * A store instruction to store a value from a register into memory * An arithmetic or logical instruction" LLVM,RISCV,2441,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `FirstMaskArgument = preAssignMask(Outs);` This statement assigns the value of `preAssignMask(Outs)` to the variable `FirstMaskArgument`. The `preAssignMask` function is not defined in the code snippet, so it is not possible to determine what it does. However, based on the name of the function, it is likely that it assigns a mask to the `Outs` vector." LLVM,RISCV,2442,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be: `CCState CCInfo(CallConv, IsVarArg, MF, RVLocs, Context);` This is because the code snippet is defining a function called `CCInfo` that takes five arguments: `CallConv`, `IsVarArg`, `MF`, `RVLocs`, and `Context`. The function is also using a template parameter called `Optional` that is not defined in the code snippet provided. The `Optional` parameter is likely to be a type that is defined elsewhere in the code." LLVM,RISCV,2443,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `State . addLoc ( CCValAssign :: getReg ( ValNo , ValVT , Reg , LocVT , LocInfo ) ) ;` This statement adds a location to the state, which is represented by a register. The register is obtained by calling the `getReg` method of the `CCValAssign` class, which takes several parameters, including the value number, the value type, and the register. The `LocVT` and `LocInfo` parameters are also passed to the method. The `State` object is" LLVM,RISCV,2444,"The next statement of this code snippet is: State.addLoc(CCValAssign::getReg(ValNo2, ValVT2, Reg, LocVT2, CCValAssign::Full)); Explanation: The code snippet is a part of a function that is allocating registers and stack memory for a function call. The first part of the code allocates a register and adds it to the state using the `addLoc` method. The second part of the code checks if a register was allocated and if so, it adds it to the state using the `add" LLVM,RISCV,2445,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `if (LocVT == )` This is because the previous `if` statement was not executed, so the control flow will continue to the next `if` statement. The condition of this `if` statement is `LocVT == `, which is a string literal that is not equal to the value of `LocVT`. Therefore, the body of this `if` statement will not be executed, and the control flow will continue to the next statement." LLVM,RISCV,2446,"Based on the code snippet you provided, it appears that the next statement will be: `State.addLoc(CCValAssign::getReg(ValNo, ValVT, Reg, LocVT, LocInfo));` This line of code is adding a new location to the state, using the `CCValAssign::getReg` function to generate the register number for the location. The `State.addLoc` method is then called with the generated register number and the `LocVT` value." LLVM,RISCV,2447,"The next statement of the code snippet is: `if (LocVT == ) {` This is because the code is checking if the value of `LocVT` is equal to ``, and if it is, it will execute the code inside the `if` block." LLVM,RISCV,2448,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `SDLoc DL(N);` This line creates a new `SDLoc` object with the name `DL` and initializes it with the value of the `N` object. The `SDLoc` class is a part of the LLVM IR and is used to represent a location in the program's memory. The `DL` object will be used to store the location of the `N` object in the program's memory." LLVM,RISCV,2449,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific values of the variables and the behavior of the functions being called. However, based on the code provided, it appears that the next statement will be a comparison of the values of `ShAmt1` and `ShAmt2`. The code is checking whether the operands of the `Src` node are both constant, and if so, it is extracting the constant values of the operands and storing them in `ShAmt1` and `ShAmt2`, respectively. The next" LLVM,RISCV,2450,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `Op1 = Op1 . getOperand ( ) ;` This line of code is assigning the value of the operand at index `` of `Op1` to `Op1`." LLVM,RISCV,2451,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `Op0 = Op0.getOperand();` This statement assigns the operand of `Op0` at index `` to `Op0`." LLVM,RISCV,2452,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be a call to the `matchGREVIPat` function, which is used to match a pattern for the `GREVI` instruction. The function takes an `SDValue` as an argument and returns a pointer to a `GREVIPattern` object if a match is found, or `nullptr` otherwise. The code snippet is checking if the `Op0` and `Op1` operands of the `GREVI` instruction match a specific pattern, and if so, it returns a value that represents the result of the" LLVM,RISCV,2453,"Based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the next statement will be: `Value *LHSVal = LHS->getOperand(0);` This is because the `LHS` variable is a `GREVIPat` object, and the `getOperand` method is being called on it with the argument `0`. This will return the first operand of the `LHS` object, which is likely to be a `Value` object. The `LHSVal` variable is then assigned the result of this method call." LLVM,RISCV,2454,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `NonConstantVal = FalseVal;` This is because the `if` statement checks whether `TrueVal` is a zero or all ones constant, and if it is, it sets `SwapSelectOps` to `false` and `NonConstantVal` to `FalseVal`. If `TrueVal` is not a zero or all ones constant, the `else if` statement checks whether `FalseVal` is a zero or all ones constant, and if it is, it sets `SwapSelectOps` to `true` and" LLVM,RISCV,2455,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `combineSelectAndUseCommutative` function and the values of the `N0` and `N1` variables. However, based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the function is attempting to combine two select instructions and use the commutative property of the instructions to simplify the expression. The `N0` and `N1` variables are likely to be the operands of the select instructions, and the function is attempting to combine them in a way that takes advantage" LLVM,RISCV,2456,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `combineSelectAndUse` function and the values of the `N`, `N0`, and `N1` variables. However, based on the name of the function and the variables used, it is likely that the next statement will be related to the combination of the select and use operations on the values of `N`, `N0`, and `N1`. One possible next statement could be: `SDValue Result = combineSelectAndUse(N, N0," LLVM,RISCV,2457,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty because the behavior of the code depends on the value of the `ShAmt` variable, which is not specified in the code snippet. However, based on the structure of the code, it appears that the code is performing a series of bitwise operations on the `x` variable, using the `ShAmt` variable as a parameter to control the amount of shifting. The code is using the bitwise AND operator (`&`) to mask off certain bits of the `x` variable, and then shifting the resulting value using" LLVM,RISCV,2458,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty because the behavior of the code depends on the value of the `ShAmt` variable, which is not specified in the code snippet. However, based on the structure of the code, it appears that the code is performing a series of bitwise operations on the `x` variable, using the `ShAmt` variable as a parameter to control the amount of shifting. The code is using the bitwise AND operator (`&`) to mask off certain bits of the `x` variable, and then shifting the resulting value using" LLVM,RISCV,2459,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific values of the variables and the behavior of the functions being called. However, based on the context and the patterns in the code, it is likely that the next statement will be another case statement or a default statement. The code snippet is part of a switch statement that is handling different cases for a specific operation (Opc), and each case statement is handling a different type of operation. The current case statement is handling the case where the operation is a shift right (Opc == )." LLVM,RISCV,2460,"The next statement of this code snippet is: return Subtarget . getXLen ( ) - Op . getOperand ( ) . getScalarValueSizeInBits ( ) + ; Explanation: The code snippet is a part of a switch statement that is checking the type of the operand and performing different operations based on the type. The current case is checking if the operand is a constant integer and has a specific value. If the operand meets these conditions, the code snippet will return a value that is computed based" LLVM,RISCV,2461,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `assert(VT.isFixedLengthVector() && );` This statement is an assertion that the `VT` object is a fixed-length vector and that the string literal `` is not null. If the assertion fails, the program will terminate with an error message." LLVM,RISCV,2462,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `case CCValAssign :: BCvt:` This is because the `switch` statement is checking the value of `CCValAssign`, and the next case after `CCValAssign :: Full` is `CCValAssign :: BCvt`." LLVM,RISCV,2463,The next statement after `return true ;` would be the end of the function or method. LLVM,RISCV,2464,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be a closing brace `}` to match the opening brace `{` at the beginning of the function. Here's the complete code snippet with the predicted next statement: ``` bool convertSelectOfConstantsToMath ( EVT VT ) const override { return true ; } ```" LLVM,RISCV,2465,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be a call to the `getNode` method of the `DAG` object, passing in the `VT` variable as the first argument, and the `V` and `Zero` variables as the second and third arguments, respectively. The `getNode` method is used to create a new node in the DAG, and the arguments passed to it determine the type of node that is created. In this case, the `VT` variable is used to specify the type of the node, and the `V` and `Zero` variables are used" LLVM,RISCV,2466,"The next statement in the code snippet is: `assert(VT.isScalableVector() && );` This is because the first `assert` statement is checking if `VT` is a scalable vector, and the second `assert` statement is checking if `V` is a fixed-length vector. Since `VT` is a scalable vector, the first `assert` statement will pass, and the second `assert` statement will fail because `V` is not a fixed-length vector." LLVM,RISCV,2467,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `Val = convertToBCvtVector(LocVT, Val, DAG, Subtarget);`" LLVM,RISCV,2468,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it appears to be part of a larger program and the context is not provided. However, based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the next statement may be a call to the `getNode` method of the `DAG` object, passing in the `WOpcode` and `NewRes` values as arguments. The `getNode` method is not defined in the code snippet provided, so it is not possible to determine its exact behavior." LLVM,RISCV,2469,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific values of the variables and the implementation of the `getNode` method. However, based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the next statement will likely be a call to the `getNode` method with the `WOpcode` opcode and the `NewOp0` and `NewOp1` operands. Here is a possible next statement: ``` SDValue NewRes = DAG.getNode(WOpcode, DL, , NewOp" LLVM,RISCV,2470,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `getNode` method and the values of the variables `N`, `DL`, ``, `NewOp0`, and `NewOp1`. However, based on the syntax and the fact that the method is called on the `DAG` object, it is likely that the next statement will be a call to a method on the `SDValue` object returned by the `getNode` method." LLVM,RISCV,2471,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific values of the variables and the implementation of the `getNode` and `getOpcode` methods. However, based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the next statement will likely be a call to the `getNode` method, passing in the opcode of the new operation and the two new operands as arguments. Here is a possible next statement: ``` SDValue NewWOp = DAG.getNode(N->getOpcode(), DL, = Subtarget.getXLen()) return false;` This statement checks if the target machine has the standard extension M (which is used for multiplication) and if the size of the value type is greater than or equal to the size of the target machine's X register. If this condition is true, the function returns false." LLVM,RISCV,2473,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `if (Subtarget.hasStdExtZba() && !Imm.isSignedIntN(NUM_LIT) && ((Imm - NUM_LIT).isPowerOf2() || (Imm - NUM_LIT).isPowerOf2() || (Imm - NUM_LIT).isPowerOf2())) return true;` This statement checks if the `Subtarget` has the `StdExtZba` extension and if the immediate value `Imm` is not a signed integer with the specified number" LLVM,RISCV,2474,"The next statement of this code snippet is: SubRegIdx = 0;" LLVM,RISCV,2475,"This code snippet is defining a function called `decomposeSubvectorInsertExtractToSubRegs` that belongs to a class called `TargetLowering`. The function takes several parameters, including `VecVT`, `SubVecVT`, `InsertExtractIdx`, and `TRI`. The function is using a `static_assert` statement to check that certain conditions are true. The conditions are: * `VecVT` is greater than `SubVecVT` * `VecVT` is greater than `InsertExtractIdx` * `VecVT" LLVM,RISCV,2476,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific values of the variables and the implementation of the `MachineFunctionInfo` class. However, based on the code snippet, it appears that the next statement is likely to be a call to the `MachineFunctionInfo::getMoveF64FrameIndex` method, which returns the frame index for a move instruction that moves a 64-bit value. The method takes a `MachineFunctionInfo` object and a `MachineMemOperand` object as arguments, and returns an integer representing the frame index." LLVM,RISCV,2477,The next statement after the `if` block is `return nullptr;`. LLVM,RISCV,2478,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be a call to the `CreateCall` method of the `Builder` object, passing in the `MaskedCmpXchg` function and a set of arguments. The `CreateCall` method will create a new call instruction and insert it into the module's IR. Here's a breakdown of the code snippet: * `Type * Tys [ ] = { AlignedAddr -> getType ( ) } ;` declares an array of `Type` objects, where each element is the result of calling the `getType" LLVM,RISCV,2479,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `Value * MaskedCmpXchg = Builder.CreateCall(MaskedCmpXchg, {AlignedAddr, CmpVal, NewVal, Mask, Ordering});` This statement creates a call to the `MaskedCmpXchg` function, passing in the `AlignedAddr`, `CmpVal`, `NewVal`, `Mask`, and `Ordering` values as arguments. The `CreateCall` method is used to create the call, and the `MaskedCmp" LLVM,RISCV,2480,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet without knowing the context and the values of the variables and constants used in the code. However, based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the code is generating machine code for a loop that reads a register and then performs some operations on it. The code snippet is using the LLVM API to create and manipulate machine code instructions. It is creating a new basic block (LoopMBB) and adding instructions to it. The instructions are being added using the BuildMI function, which takes a basic block, a debug location, a target instruction info, and a" LLVM,RISCV,2481,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be: `LoopMBB->addSuccessor(DoneMBB);` This is because the code is creating a loop by adding a successor to the `LoopMBB` machine basic block, which is the block that will be executed repeatedly. The `DoneMBB` machine basic block is the block that will be executed after the loop is finished, and it is being added as a successor to the `LoopMBB` block to indicate that it should be executed after the loop." LLVM,RISCV,2482,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `HeadMBB->addSuccessor(IfFalseMBB);` This statement adds a successor to the `HeadMBB` machine basic block, which is the block that contains the `select` instruction. The successor is the `IfFalseMBB` machine basic block, which is the block that will be executed if the condition of the `select` instruction is false." LLVM,RISCV,2483,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific values of the variables and the behavior of the functions being called. However, based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the next statement will be a call to the `BuildMI` function with the `MI` object as an argument. The `BuildMI` function is used to build a machine instruction, and the arguments passed to it indicate that it will be building a memory load instruction with the `LoReg` and `HiReg` registers as the destination and source registers, respectively. The `addFrameIndex" LLVM,RISCV,2484,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the code depends on the specific values of the variables and the implementation of the functions called. However, based on the context and the names of the variables, it appears that the code is related to the generation of machine code for a specific instruction set architecture (ISA). The code defines several constants and variables, including `TII`, `RI`, `LoReg`, `HiReg`, `SrcReg`, `SrcRC`, and `FI`. These variables are likely to be used in the subsequent code to" LLVM,RISCV,2485,The next statement after the `if` block is `return nullptr;`. LLVM,RISCV,2486,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `emitTrailingFence` method and the context in which it is being called. However, based on the name of the method and the parameters it takes, it appears to be related to the generation of code for a fence instruction in a target-specific instruction set architecture (ISA). The `emitTrailingFence` method is likely to be part of a class that implements the `TargetLowering` interface, which is responsible for generating code for a specific ISA. The" LLVM,RISCV,2487,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return DAG . getMergeValues ( { DAG . getBitcast ( VT , L ) , L . getValue ( ) } , DL ) ;` This statement is a return statement that returns the result of the `getMergeValues` method of the `DAG` object, which is a merge of the values of the `L` object and the `NUM_LIT` literal. The `getMergeValues` method takes two arguments: an array of values to merge, and a" LLVM,RISCV,2488,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific inputs and the implementation of the `DAG` class. However, based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the next statement will be a call to the `getLoad` method of the `DAG` class, passing in several arguments related to the load operation. The `getLoad` method is likely to return a `SDValue` object representing the loaded value, which will be assigned to the `L` variable." LLVM,RISCV,2489,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `StoredVal = DAG.getBitcast(NewVT, StoredVal);` This statement is a call to the `getBitcast` method of the `DAG` object, which is used to perform a bitcast operation on the `StoredVal` value. The `NewVT` variable is passed as the first argument to `getBitcast`, which specifies the new type of the bitcast operation. The `StoredVal` variable is passed as the second argument to `getBitcast`, which is the value that" LLVM,RISCV,2490,"Based on the code snippet you provided, it appears to be a part of a function that generates machine code for a target architecture. The function takes in a number of parameters, including a node `N`, a data layout `DL`, a type `Ty`, a DAG (Directed Acyclic Graph) `DAG`, and various other parameters. The function first calls `getTargetNode` to get a target node for the given parameters, and then checks if the node is local or not. If the node is local, the function returns a machine node with the given parameters. If the node is not local" LLVM,RISCV,2491,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return TargetLowering :: getConstraintType ( Constraint ) ;` This statement returns the result of the `getConstraintType` method of the `TargetLowering` class, which is called with the `Constraint` parameter. The `getConstraintType` method is not defined in the code snippet you provided, so it is not possible to determine what it does or what it returns. However, based on the context of the code, it appears that the method returns a value that represents the type of constraint that is being applied to the instruction." LLVM,RISCV,2492,"The next statement after the `assert` statement is the `return` statement. The `assert` statement checks that the vector type `VecVT` is scalable and that the string literal `` is not empty. If the assertion fails, the program will terminate with an error message. If the assertion succeeds, the `return` statement will return the result of the `getDefaultVLOps` function, which is a vector operation." LLVM,RISCV,2493,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return getDefaultVLOps(VecVT, VecVT, DL, DAG, Subtarget);` This statement returns the result of the `getDefaultVLOps` function, which is a pair of `SDValue` objects. The `getDefaultVLOps` function is called with the same `VecVT` and `DL` arguments as the `getDefaultScalableVLOps` function, and the `DAG` and `Subtarget` arguments are also passed through. The `getDefaultVLOps`" LLVM,RISCV,2494,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `ContainerVT` and `Subtarget` classes. However, based on the code provided, it appears that the next statement will be: `MVT XLenVT = Subtarget . getXLenVT ( ) ;` This statement is assigning the result of the `getXLenVT()` method of the `Subtarget` class to the `XLenVT` variable. The `getXLenVT()` method is likely to return a value" LLVM,RISCV,2495,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet without knowing the specific implementation of the `TargetLowering` class and the `CallLoweringInfo` constructor. However, based on the code snippet you provided, it appears that the next statement will be a call to the `CallLoweringInfo` constructor, which will create a new instance of the `CallLoweringInfo` class and store it in the `CLI` variable. Here is an example of what the next statement might look like: ``` CLI = TargetLowering::CallLoweringInfo(DAG); ``` This statement" LLVM,RISCV,2496,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `getTargetGlobalAddress` and `getMachineNode` methods, as well as the values of the variables `DL`, `Ty`, and `Args`. However, based on the names of the methods and the types of the variables, it is likely that the next statement will be a call to a method that creates a new node in the directed acyclic graph (DAG) representing the program. The `getTargetGlobalAddress` method is likely to return a pointer to a global variable" LLVM,RISCV,2497,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `getExceptionPointerRegister` method and the values of the input parameters. However, based on the name of the method and the parameters, it is likely that the next statement will involve retrieving the exception pointer register (e.g., `x86_64::X86_64_ExceptionPointerRegister`) and returning it as the result of the method." LLVM,RISCV,2498,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `getExceptionPointerRegister` method and the values of the `ISA_LIT` and `STR_LIT` constants. However, based on the name of the method and the parameters it takes, it is likely that the next statement will be a return statement that returns a register number or a pointer to a register that is used to store the exception pointer. The `ISA_LIT` constant is likely to be a constant that represents the instruction set architecture (ISA)" LLVM,RISCV,2499,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the `getExceptionSelectorRegister` method is dependent on the specific implementation of the `TargetLowering` class and the `Constant` class. However, based on the name of the method and the parameters it takes, it is likely that the method is responsible for retrieving a register that is used to store the exception selector for the personality function specified by the `PersonalityFn` parameter. The `Constant` class is likely used to represent a constant value that is used as an argument to the `" LLVM,RISCV,2500,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be the return statement, which will return the value of the `extendForAtomicCmpSwapArg` member variable. The value of this variable is not explicitly defined in the code snippet, so it is not possible to predict its exact value. However, based on the name of the variable, it is likely to be a string that represents the extension for the atomic compare-and-swap argument." LLVM,RISCV,2501,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `getExtendForAtomicOps` method in the derived class. However, based on the name of the method and the fact that it is marked as `const override`, it is likely that the method returns a value that indicates the extent to which atomic operations are supported by the class." LLVM,RISCV,2502,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `getExtendForAtomicOps` method in the derived class. However, based on the name of the method and the fact that it is marked as `const override`, it is likely that the method returns a value that indicates the extent to which atomic operations are supported by the class." LLVM,RISCV,2503,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the values of the variables and the behavior of the `ConstraintCode` object. However, based on the code snippet, it appears that the `ConstraintCode` object is being accessed and its size is being checked. If the size of the `ConstraintCode` object is equal to ``, then the code will switch on the value of `ConstraintCode[]`. Without knowing the values of the variables and the behavior of the `ConstraintCode` object, it is not possible to" LLVM,RISCV,2504,"Based on the code snippet you provided, it appears that the next statement will be: case : return :: LMUL_8; This is because the switch statement is checking the value of KnownSize, which is being set to the size of the vector in bits, and then multiplying it by a constant if the vector element type is a string literal. The switch statement is then checking the value of KnownSize and returning a value based on its size. The next case in the switch statement is for the value ," LLVM,RISCV,2505,"The next statement after the code snippet you provided is: `assert ( VT . getVectorElementType ( ) . getSizeInBits ( ) <= && ) ;` This statement is an assertion that checks if the size of the vector element type is less than or equal to a certain value, and if the string literal is not empty. If the assertion fails, the program will terminate with an error message." LLVM,RISCV,2506,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `TargetLowering` class and the values of the input parameters. However, based on the name of the method and the parameters, it is likely that the next statement will be a switch statement that selects the appropriate number of registers to use for the specified calling convention and vector type. Here is an example of what the next statement might look like: ``` switch (CC) { case CallingConv::C: return 0; case CallingCon" LLVM,RISCV,2507,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the `llvm_unreachable` function is not known. However, based on the syntax and the fact that the function is called with a string literal, it is likely that the function will cause the program to terminate or exit abnormally. The `llvm_unreachable` function is a built-in function in LLVM that is used to indicate that a particular code path is unreachable. It is typically used in situations where the compiler can prove that a certain branch of" LLVM,RISCV,2508,"The next statement after the `if` statement will be the `return` statement. The `if` statement checks if the vector element type is a string literal, and if it is, the function returns the string literal. If the vector element type is not a string literal, the function returns the result of the `getRegClassIDForLMUL` function called with the `getLMUL` function applied to the `VT` variable." LLVM,RISCV,2509,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return ;` This is because the `if` statement checks if the vector element type is equal to ``, and if it is, the function returns ``." LLVM,RISCV,2510,"The next statement after the `if` statement is: `Reg = MatchRegisterName(RegName);` This statement assigns the result of the `MatchRegisterName` function to the `Reg` variable, which is a register name. The `MatchRegisterName` function takes a register name as an argument and returns the corresponding register number. Therefore, the next statement after the `if` statement is to assign the register number to the `Reg` variable." LLVM,RISCV,2511,The next statement after the `if` statement is the `return` statement. The `return` statement will return the value of `Reg` to the caller of the function. LLVM,RISCV,2512,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return getRegisterTypeForCallingConv(Context, CC, VT);`" LLVM,RISCV,2513,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return ;` This is because the `if` statement checks if `VT` is equal to `` and if the subtarget has the `StdExtF` extension but not the `StdExtZfh` extension. If both conditions are true, the function returns ``." LLVM,RISCV,2514,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be: `Mask = DAG.getMaskForRVV(VT, ContainerVT, DL, Subtarget);` This statement is creating a mask for the RVV (RISC-V Vector) instruction, which is used to extend or round the vector operand. The `getMaskForRVV` method is called on the `DAG` object, which is a class that represents the data flow graph of the RISC-V instruction set. The method takes several parameters, including the vector type `V" LLVM,RISCV,2515,The next statement after the `default` case is `llvm_unreachable()`. LLVM,RISCV,2516,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return getPointerTy(DL, VT.getVectorElementType());` Explanation: The `getSetCCResultType` method is called with three arguments: `DL`, `Context`, and `VT`. The method checks if `VT` is a vector type by calling the `isVector` method on `VT`. If `VT` is not a vector type, the method returns the result of calling the `getPointerTy` method on `DL`. If `VT` is a vector type" LLVM,RISCV,2517,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific values of the variables and the implementation of the `getTargetGlobalAddress` and `getMachineNode` methods. However, based on the names of the methods and the variables, it appears that the code is working with memory addresses and machine nodes, and is likely to be related to the implementation of a garbage collector or memory management system. Here are a few possible next statements: 1. `SDValue MNLo = SDValue(DAG.getMachineNode(;" LLVM,RISCV,2522,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the `getXLenVT` method is not specified. However, based on the name of the method and the context in which it is being called, it is likely that the method returns a value that is related to the length of the target platform's virtual address space. Without more information about the specific implementation of the `Subtarget` class and the `getXLenVT` method, it is not possible to provide a more specific prediction of the next statement." LLVM,RISCV,2523,"The next statement of this code snippet is: return ( VT == && Subtarget . hasStdExtZfh ( ) ) || ( VT == && Subtarget . hasStdExtF ( ) ) || ( VT == && Subtarget . hasStdExtD ( ) ) ; This statement is the return statement of the `hasBitPreservingFPLogic` function, which returns a boolean value indicating whether the target has bit-preserving floating-point logic for the given vector type" LLVM,RISCV,2524,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet without knowing the specific implementation of the `TargetLowering` class and the context in which it is being used. However, based on the name of the method and the return type, it appears that this method is checking whether a particular operation is cheap to speculate in the control flow. Without more information, it is not possible to determine the exact next statement of this code snippet. However, some possible next statements could include: * Checking the cost of the operation in the control flow. * Checking the availability of the operation in" LLVM,RISCV,2525,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `Subtarget` class and the `hasStdExtZbb()` method. However, based on the name of the method, it is likely that it returns a boolean value indicating whether the `Subtarget` has the standard extension `Zbb` or not. Therefore, the next statement of this code snippet could be any statement that is executed after the `hasStdExtZbb()` method is called, such as: * If the `Subtarget` has the" LLVM,RISCV,2526,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet without knowing the specific implementation of the `TargetLowering` class and the context in which it is being used. However, based on the name of the method and the return type, it is likely that this method is checking whether a particular operation is cheap to speculate, meaning that it is likely to be executed quickly and without any significant overhead. Some possible next statements could include: * Checking the cost of the operation using a cost model or heuristic. * Checking the properties of the operation, such as its latency or through" LLVM,RISCV,2527,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific values of the variables and the behavior of the functions being called. However, based on the context and the structure of the code, it is likely that the next statement will be a comparison or a call to a function. The code snippet appears to be part of a function that is checking whether a given value can be used as an immediate operand in an instruction. The function takes two arguments, `C1Int` and `C2`, and returns a boolean value indicating whether the value can be used as an" LLVM,RISCV,2528,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return true;` Explanation: The code snippet is checking if the operand of `N` at index `` is a `ConstantSDNode` and if the operand at index `` is a `ConstantSDNode`. If both conditions are true, it means that the operand at index `` is a `ConstantSDNode` and the operand at index `` is a `ConstantSDNode`. In this case," LLVM,RISCV,2529,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `if (GlobalAddressSDNode *G = dyn_cast(Callee)) {`" LLVM,RISCV,2530,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `const uint32_t * CalleePreserved = TRI -> getCallPreservedMask ( MF , CalleeCC ) ;` This statement is assigning the result of the `getCallPreservedMask` method of the `TRI` object (which is an instance of the `RegisterInfo` class) to the `CalleePreserved` variable. The method is called with two arguments: `MF` and `CalleeCC`. The `MF` argument is a `MachineFunction` object, and the `" LLVM,RISCV,2531,"It is difficult to predict the next statement with certainty, as it depends on the specific input and the implementation of the `hasStdExtZfh`, `hasStdExtF`, and `hasStdExtD` methods. However, based on the pattern of the code snippet, it is likely that the next statement will be another `case` statement, possibly with a different string literal as the condition." LLVM,RISCV,2532,"The next statement after the given code snippet is: `return false;`" LLVM,RISCV,2533,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific values of the variables and the behavior of the `isIntegerTy`, `isHalfTy`, `isFloatTy`, and `isDoubleTy` methods. However, based on the code snippet, it appears that the next statement will be a call to one of the `hasStdExt` methods, depending on the type of the `ScalarTy` variable." LLVM,RISCV,2534,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `if (C1.isSignedIntN() && !(C1 * C2).isSignedIntN()) return false;` This statement checks if the result of the multiplication of `C1` and `C2` is a signed integer with a specific number of bits (represented by ``). If the result is not a signed integer with the specified number of bits, the function returns `false`." LLVM,RISCV,2535,"The next statement after the `if` block is the `return true` statement. The `if` block checks if the mask is a splat mask, which means that all the elements in the mask are the same. If the mask is a splat mask, the function returns `true`. If the mask is not a splat mask, the function continues to the next statement, which is the `return false` statement. Therefore, the next statement after the `if` block is the `return false` statement." LLVM,RISCV,2536,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be: `return false;` The `isShuffleMaskLegal` function is checking if the shuffle mask is a splat mask, and if it is, it returns `true`. If the shuffle mask is not a splat mask, the function returns `false`." LLVM,RISCV,2537,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `if ( SeqStepNum && SeqStepDenom ) {` This is because the previous `if` statement has an `else` clause that returns `None` if the condition is not met. Therefore, if the condition is met, the code will continue to the next statement, which is the `if` statement with the condition `SeqStepNum && SeqStepDenom`." LLVM,RISCV,2538,"The next statement of the code snippet is: `Val = DAG.getNode(, DL, , Val, DAG.getConstant(, DL, Subtarget.getXLenVT()));` This statement is a call to the `getNode` method of the `DAG` object, which creates a new node in the DAG. The first argument is a string literal that represents the name of the node, the second argument is the data layout object, the third argument is the type of the" LLVM,RISCV,2539,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `convertFromScalableVector` function and the values of the variables `VT`, `Max`, `DAG`, and `Subtarget`. However, based on the context and the names of the variables, it is likely that the next statement will be a call to the `convertFromScalableVector` function, which will convert the value of `Max` from a scalable vector to a vector of the type specified by `VT`." LLVM,RISCV,2540,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be: `SDValue NegX = DAG.getNode(, DL, ContainerVT, SplatZero, X, Mask, VL);` This statement creates a new SDValue `NegX` by calling the `getNode` method of the `DAG` object, passing in the string literal ``, the data layout `DL`, the container VT `ContainerVT`, the `SplatZero` SDValue, the `X` SDValue, the" LLVM,RISCV,2541,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `BlockAddress * BA = N->getBlockAddress();`" LLVM,RISCV,2542,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `BlockAddress * BA = N->getBlockAddress();`" LLVM,RISCV,2543,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `ConstantPoolSDNode *N = cast(Op);` This statement is casting the `Op` SDValue to a `ConstantPoolSDNode` pointer, which is then stored in the `N` variable." LLVM,RISCV,2544,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `SDValue SlidedownAmt = DAG.getConstant(RemIdx, DL, XLenVT);` This line of code is assigning the value of `RemIdx` to the variable `SlidedownAmt`, which is a constant value of type `XLenVT`. The `getConstant` method is used to create a constant value of the specified type and value." LLVM,RISCV,2545,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `Vec = DAG.getNode(, DL, WideVT, Vec);` This statement is assigning a new value to the `Vec` variable, which is a `SDValue` object. The `getNode` method is called on the `DAG` object, which is a `DataflowGraph` object, and it is passed several arguments: * ``: This is a string literal that represents the name of the node to be created. * `DL`: This is" LLVM,RISCV,2546,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific values of the variables and the behavior of the functions being called. However, based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the next statement will be a call to the `convertFromScalableVector` function, which takes the `ExtVT` and `Ext` values as arguments. The `ExtVT` value is the result of the `getNode` call, and the `Ext` value is the result of the `convertToScalableVector` call. The `convertFromScalableVector`" LLVM,RISCV,2547,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be: `SDValue Op2 = convertToScalableVector(ContainerVT, Op.getOperand(), DAG, Subtarget);` This is because the code is using the `convertToScalableVector` function to convert the operand of the `Op` instruction to a scalable vector, and the `ContainerVT` variable is being used to specify the type of the vector. The `Op.getOperand()` expression is likely to be used to retrieve the" LLVM,RISCV,2548,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `Mag = convertToScalableVector(ContainerVT, Mag, DAG, Subtarget);` This statement converts the `Mag` operand to a scalable vector using the `convertToScalableVector` function, which takes the container vector type, the operand to convert, the DAG, and the subtarget as arguments. The `ContainerVT` variable is the container vector type, and `Mag` is the operand to convert. The `DAG` and `Subtarget` arguments are passed through to the `convertToScal" LLVM,RISCV,2549,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be: `return Result;` This is because the `lowerFixedLengthVectorLoadToRVV` function is expected to return a value of type `SDValue`, which is the type of the `Result` variable. The function has been computing this value by performing various operations on the input `SDValue` and other data structures, and it is now ready to return the result to the caller." LLVM,RISCV,2550,"The next statement after the `if` block is the `return` statement. The `return` statement will return the result of the `lowerToScalableOp` function, which is called with the `Op`, `DAG`, `MaskOpc`, and `false` arguments." LLVM,RISCV,2551,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `getDefaultVLOps` function and the `DAG` object. However, based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the next statement will be a call to the `getNode` method of the `DAG` object, passing in the `ContainerVT` object, the `DL` object, the `VT` object, the `CC` object, and the `Op1` and `Op2` objects as arguments. The `getNode` method" LLVM,RISCV,2552,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `convertToScalableVector` function and the values of the operands. However, based on the code snippet provided, it is likely that the next statement will be a call to the `SDValue` constructor, which will create a new `SDValue` object with the specified operands. Here is an example of what the next statement might look like: ``` SDValue Op1 = convertToScalableVector(ContainerVT, Op.getOperand(`. However, based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the next statement is likely to be a call to the `getNode` method of the `DAG` class, passing in the `Opc`, `DL`, `DstVT`, and `Src` variables as arguments. The `get" LLVM,RISCV,2560,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet without knowing the specific implementation of the functions and methods being called. However, based on the names of the functions and variables, it appears that this code is related to the generation of machine code for a computer program. The `MachineFunction` class appears to represent a function in the machine code, and the `MachineFrameInfo` class appears to represent information about the function's frame. The `setFrameAddressIsTaken` method is likely setting a flag indicating that the function's frame address is taken, and the `getFrameRegister` method is" LLVM,RISCV,2561,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific values of the constants and variables used in the code. However, based on the information provided, it appears that the code is defining a constant called `Table` and a variable called `Shift`. The `Table` constant is being defined as a bitwise OR of several values, each of which is a bitwise shift of a constant value by a certain number of bits. The number of bits to shift is determined by the value of the `NUM_LIT` constant, which is not specified in the code" LLVM,RISCV,2562,"This code snippet is creating a table of rounding modes and their corresponding shift values, and then using that table to perform a rounding operation on a value. The first line of the code creates a constant integer table with the following structure: ``` { { RoundingMode::NearestTiesToEven, * }, { RoundingMode::TowardZero, * }, { RoundingMode::TowardNegative, , DL, Ty, Addr, DAG.getConstant(Offset, DL, XLenVT));` This statement is reached if the `Offset` variable is not equal to ``. The `getNode` method is called on the `DAG` object with the following arguments: * ``: A string literal that represents the name of the node. * `DL`: The data layout of the node." LLVM,RISCV,2564,"The next statement of the code snippet is: `Vec = DAG.getNode(Opc, DL, ContainerVT, Vec, Val, VL);` This statement is a call to the `getNode` method of the `DAG` object, which creates a new node in the DAG. The node is created with the opcode `Opc`, the data layout `DL`, the container vector type `ContainerVT`, and the vector `Vec`, the value `Val`, and the vector length `VL`. The resulting node is stored in the `Vec` variable." LLVM,RISCV,2565,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet without knowing the context and the specific values of the variables used in the code. However, based on the syntax and the structure of the code, it appears that the next statement will be a call to the `getMemIntrinsicNode` method of the `DAG` object, which is likely to create a new memory intrinsic node in the LLVM IR. The method takes several arguments, including the name of the intrinsic, the data layout, the vector type list, the operands, the memory virtual type, and the memory operand. The return" LLVM,RISCV,2566,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it appears to be a fragment of a larger function and the context is not provided. However, based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the next statement will likely be a call to the `DAG.getNode` method, as this is a common pattern in the code snippet. The `DAG.getNode` method is used to create a new node in the DAG (Directed Acyclic Graph) representing the computation being performed. The method takes several arguments, including the type of node to create, the" LLVM,RISCV,2567,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet without knowing the specific values of the variables and constants used in the code. However, based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the next statement will be a call to the `DAG.getBitcast` method, which is used to cast a value from one type to another. The method takes three arguments: the type to cast to, the value to cast, and the number of elements in the vector. In this case, the `DAG.getBitcast` method is being called to cast a value of type `I32V" LLVM,RISCV,2568,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet without knowing the context and the specific values of the variables used in the code. However, based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the next statement will be a call to the `DAG.getMemIntrinsicNode()` method, which will create a new memory intrinsic node in the DAG. The method will take several arguments, including the name of the intrinsic, the data layout, the vector type list, the operand list, the memory operand, and the memory value type. The method will return a new SDValue that represents the" LLVM,RISCV,2569,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be the return statement, which returns the result of the `getAddr` function called with the `N` and `DAG` arguments. The `getAddr` function is not defined in the code snippet provided, so it is not possible to determine its exact behavior. However, based on the name of the function and the fact that it is called with a `JumpTableSDNode` and a `DAG` argument, it is likely that the function returns the address of a jump table or a data structure that is used to implement a jump table" LLVM,RISCV,2570,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be a check on the value of `N` to determine the next action to take. For example, it could be a switch statement that checks the value of `N` and performs a different action depending on its value. Without more context, it is difficult to provide a more specific prediction. Can you provide more information about the code snippet or the program it is a part of?" LLVM,RISCV,2571,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `Ops.push_back(DAG.getTargetConstant(IntID, DL, XLenVT));` This statement adds a new element to the `Ops` vector, which is a small vector of `SDValue` objects. The element being added is a target constant with the value `IntID`, which is a constant integer value. The constant is defined in the `XLenVT` type, which is a type that represents a vector of integers with a length that is a power of 2. The" LLVM,RISCV,2572,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `getXLenVT` and `getContainerForFixedLengthVector` methods, as well as the values of the `VT` and `DL` variables. However, based on the context of the code snippet, it appears that the next statement is likely to be a call to the `getDefaultVLOps` method, which is used to retrieve the default vector operations for a given vector type and container type. The method takes four arguments: the vector type, the container type" LLVM,RISCV,2573,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `assert(VT.getVectorElementCount() == IndexVT.getVectorElementCount() && ""Vector element count mismatch"");` This statement is an assertion that checks if the vector element count of the value `Val` and the index `Index` are the same. If they are not the same, the assertion will fail and the program will abort. The purpose of this assertion is to ensure that the scatter operation is performed correctly, as the vector element count of the value and the index must match for the operation to be valid." LLVM,RISCV,2574,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be: `Mask = convertToScalableVector(MaskVT, Mask, DAG, Subtarget);` This is because the code is currently working with the `Mask` variable, which is a vector of type `MaskVT`, and the next step is to convert it to a scalable vector using the `convertToScalableVector` function. The function takes four arguments: the type of the vector, the vector itself, the DAG, and the subtarget. The code is passing the `MaskVT` type, the `" LLVM,RISCV,2575,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `Ops.push_back(VL);` This line adds the value of `VL` to the end of the `Ops` vector." LLVM,RISCV,2576,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be the creation of a new `SmallVector` object, with the `Ops` variable as the name, and the `SDValue` type as the element type. The `Ops` vector will be initialized with the `Chain` variable, the result of `DAG.getTargetConstant(IntID, DL, XLenVT)`, and the `Val`, `BasePtr`, and `VL` variables. The `IsUnmasked` variable will be used to determine whether the `Mask` variable should be included in the `O" LLVM,RISCV,2577,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific inputs and the behavior of the functions being called. However, based on the context and the code structure, it appears that the next statement will be a call to the `report_fatal_error` function, which will terminate the program with an error message. The code is checking the attributes of a function and its return type, and if the function has a certain attribute and its return type is not void, it will report a fatal error. The error message will be generated by the `report_fatal" LLVM,RISCV,2578,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `MFI.setReturnAddressIsTaken(true);` This statement sets the `ReturnAddressIsTaken` flag to `true` in the `MachineFrameInfo` object `MFI`, which is part of the `MachineFunction` object `MF`. This indicates that the function has a return address that needs to be saved on the stack." LLVM,RISCV,2579,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return DAG . getNode ( , DL , VT , Scalar , VL ) ;` This statement is a return statement that returns a node from the DAG (Directed Acyclic Graph) with the given parameters. The node is created by calling the `getNode` method of the `DAG` object, and the parameters passed to the method are: * ``: The opcode of the node. * `DL`: The data layout of the node" LLVM,RISCV,2580,"Based on the code snippet you provided, it appears that the next statement will be: `if (TrueVal - FalseVal == 0) return DAG.getNode(, DL, Op.getValueType(), CondV, FalseV);` This is because the previous `if` statement checks if `TrueVal - FalseVal` is equal to 0, and if it is, it returns the result of `DAG.getNode(, DL, Op.getValueType(), CondV, FalseV)`." LLVM,RISCV,2581,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it appears to be a fragment of a larger program and the context is not fully provided. However, based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the next statement may be a call to the `getNode` method of the `DAG` object, passing in a string literal, the `DL` object, the result of the `Op.getValueType()` method, and an array of `SDValue` objects. The `SDValue` objects in the array are likely to be the result of previous method calls or operations." LLVM,RISCV,2582,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it appears to be part of a larger program and the context is not provided. However, based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the next statement may be related to the use of the `SDValue` class and the `getNode` method. The `SDValue` class is a part of the LLVM IR (Intermediate Representation) and is used to represent values in the LLVM IR. The `getNode` method is used to create a new node in the LLVM IR, which is a basic building" LLVM,RISCV,2583,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific values of the variables and the behavior of the `getNode` and `getConstant` methods. However, based on the code provided, it appears that the next statement will be: `RMValue = DAG.getNode(, DL, XLenVT, Shifted, DAG.getConstant(, DL, XLenVT));` This statement is assigning a new value to the `RM" LLVM,RISCV,2584,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `Hi = DAG.getNode(, DL, VT, CC, HiTrue, Zero);` This statement is assigning the result of the `getNode` method of the `DAG` object to the `Hi` variable. The `getNode` method is used to create a new node in the selection DAG, and the arguments passed to it are the type of node to create, the location of the node, the value type of the node, and the operands of the node. In this case, the" LLVM,RISCV,2585,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific values of the variables and the behavior of the `getNode` method. However, based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the next statement will likely be a call to the `getNode` method with the `ShiftRightLo` and `ShiftLeftHi` values as arguments. The `getNode` method is used to create a new node in the directed acyclic graph (DAG) that represents the computation being performed. The method takes three arguments: the name of the node, the" LLVM,RISCV,2586,"This code snippet appears to be part of a function that performs a bitwise shift operation on a pair of values, with the shift amount being a third value. The function uses the `SDValue` class to represent the values and the `DAG` class to perform the shift operation. The next statement in the code snippet is: ``` SDValue Lo = Op . getOperand ( ) ; ``` This statement retrieves the first operand of the `Op` object, which is a `SDValue` object, and assigns it to the `Lo` variable" LLVM,RISCV,2587,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `SDValue Parts[2] = {Lo, Hi};` This statement is creating an array of `SDValue` objects, with the first element being `Lo` and the second element being `Hi`. The array is named `Parts` and has a size of 2." LLVM,RISCV,2588,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `getDefaultVLOps` function and the values of the variables `VT`, `ContainerVT`, `DL`, `DAG`, and `Subtarget`. However, based on the names of the variables and the functions being called, it is likely that the next statement will be related to the creation of a vector mask or a vector of values. The `getDefaultVLOps` function is likely to return a pair of values, with the first value being a mask and the" LLVM,RISCV,2589,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific values of the variables and the behavior of the `DAG` and `getNode` functions. However, based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the next statement will be: `return DAG . getNode ( , DL , VecVT , Lo , Hi , DAG . getTargetConstant ( , DL , ) ) ;` This is because the previous `if` statement" LLVM,RISCV,2590,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be the creation of a new `SDValue` object, which will be used to represent the result of the `lowerToScalableOp` function. The `SDValue` object will be created using the `SDValue` constructor, which takes a `ValueType` and a `Value` as arguments. The `ValueType` will be set to the `ContainerVT` variable, which is the container type for the fixed-length vector, and the `Value` will be set to the result of the `convertToScalableVector` function, which is called" LLVM,RISCV,2591,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `SDValue ScalableRes = DAG.getNode(NewOpc, DL, ContainerVT, Ops);` This line of code creates a new node in the data-flow graph (DAG) with the opcode `NewOpc`, the location `DL`, the container type `ContainerVT`, and the operands `Ops`. The resulting value `ScalableRes` is then returned from the function." LLVM,RISCV,2592,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific values of the variables and the behavior of the functions called. However, based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the next statement will be a call to the `getTypeAction` function with the `VecEVT` variable as an argument. This function is likely to return a value indicating the action to be taken for the given type, and the code will then branch based on the value returned." LLVM,RISCV,2593,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be a call to the `getNode` method of the `DAG` object, passing in the opcode of the operation to be performed, the `DL` object representing the debug location, the vector type of the operation, and the `Operands` vector containing the operands of the operation. The `getNode` method will return a new `SDValue` object representing the result of the operation." LLVM,RISCV,2594,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `MVT ContainerVT = getContainerForFixedLengthVector(VecVT);` This line of code is getting the container for the fixed-length vector `VecVT`. The `getContainerForFixedLengthVector` function is not defined in the code snippet, so it is not possible to determine what it does. However, based on the name of the function, it appears to be getting a container for a fixed-length vector, which is likely a data structure that holds the elements of the vector. The `ContainerVT` variable is then" LLVM,RISCV,2595,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific values of the variables and the behavior of the functions being called. However, based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the next statement will be: `return DAG.getNode(, DL, VT, VL);` This is because the code is checking if the result of `Op.getNode()` is true, and if so, it is returning a node from the `DAG` with the given parameters. If the result of `Op." LLVM,RISCV,2596,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be: `SDValue VL = getDefaultScalableVLOps(VT, DL, DAG, Subtarget).second;` This is because the code is currently checking the value of `Op.getNode()` and if it is equal to ``, it will return a value from the `getDefaultScalableVLOps` function. The `second` property of the return value of this function is likely to be a `SDValue` object, which is what the variable `VL` is declared to" LLVM,RISCV,2597,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be: `SDValue SplatZero = DAG.getConstant(, DL, Subtarget.getXLenVT());` This statement is creating a new `SDValue` object called `SplatZero` and initializing it with a constant value of ``. The `getConstant` method is called on the `DAG` object, which is a data structure used to represent the data flow graph of the program. The `DL` parameter is the data layout of" LLVM,RISCV,2598,"The next statement of this code snippet is: SDValue Trunc = DAG . getNode ( , DL , VecVT , Src , SplatOne ) ; This statement is creating a new SDValue called Trunc, which is a node in the DAG (Directed Acyclic Graph) representing the vector truncation operation. The node is created using the DAG.getNode() method, which takes several arguments: * The first argument is the name of the operation, which is represented by the string literal """ LLVM,RISCV,2599,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty because the behavior of the code depends on the specific values of the variables and the input data. However, we can make some educated guesses based on the code snippet. The code snippet appears to be part of a function that is processing a vector of data. The function is using the `std::tie` function to unpack a tuple of values, and it is using the `getDefaultVLOps` function to get some default operations for the vector. The function is then using a `switch` statement to handle different cases based" LLVM,RISCV,2600,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be the continuation of the `for` loop, which is the next iteration of the loop. In the next iteration, the code will check if the current `SDValue` object `V` is a fixed-length vector, and if so, it will convert it to a scalable vector using the `convertToScalableVector` function. The `convertToScalableVector` function takes four arguments: the container type, the value to convert, the DAG, and the subtarget. The container type is determined by the `getContainerFor" LLVM,RISCV,2601,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be: `MVT ContainerVT = getContainerForFixedLengthVector(VT);` This line of code is assigning the result of the `getContainerForFixedLengthVector` function to the `ContainerVT` variable. The `getContainerForFixedLengthVector` function is not defined in the code snippet provided, so it is not possible to determine what it does or what it returns. However, based on the name of the function, it is likely that it returns a container for a fixed-length vector, which is then assigned to the" LLVM,RISCV,2602,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `MVT ContainerVT = getContainerForFixedLengthVector(VecVT);` This statement assigns the result of the `getContainerForFixedLengthVector` function, which takes the vector type `VecVT` as an argument, to the variable `ContainerVT`. The `getContainerForFixedLengthVector` function is not defined in the code snippet provided, so it is not possible to determine what it does or what its return value represents. However, based on the name of the function, it appears to be related to getting a container" LLVM,RISCV,2603,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific values of the literals and the implementation of the `match` function. However, based on the syntax and the context, it appears that the code is attempting to perform a bitwise operation on the `Op` variable using the `BitmanipMasks` array. The `match` function is likely being used to perform a pattern match on the `Op` variable, and the `BitmanipMasks` array is being used to specify the bitwise operation to be performed. The `ISA" LLVM,RISCV,2604,"The next statement of the code snippet is: `if (Src.getOpcode() == && isa(Src.getOperand())) {` This is a conditional statement that checks if the `Src` operand is a constant and has a specific opcode. If the condition is true, the code inside the `if` block will be executed." LLVM,RISCV,2605,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `if (ShAmt >= Width || !isPowerOf2_64(ShAmt)) return None;` This statement checks if the shift amount `ShAmt` is greater than or equal to the width of the operand, or if `ShAmt` is not a power of 2. If either of these conditions is true, the function returns `None`." LLVM,RISCV,2606,The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be a `switch` statement or a series of `if` statements that check the value of `Op` and return a corresponding `BitmanipPat` object based on the value of `Op`. The `BitmanipMasks` array is likely to be used in the `switch` statement or `if` statements to determine which `BitmanipPat` object to return. LLVM,RISCV,2607,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the code depends on the input data and the specific implementation of the `matchSHFLPat` function. However, based on the name of the function and the types of the variables involved, it is likely that the next statement will involve matching the `Op` value against a pattern that represents a specific operation on bit manipulation. Without more information about the specific implementation of the `matchSHFLPat` function, it is not possible to provide a more detailed prediction of the next statement." LLVM,RISCV,2608,"The next statement of this code snippet is: return isTailCall();" LLVM,RISCV,2609,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be a conditional statement, such as an if-else statement or a switch statement, that checks the value of the `VT` variable and determines whether or not to merge stores after legalization. The `mergeStoresAfterLegalization` function is a member function of the `TargetLowering` class, and it is used to determine whether or not to merge stores after legalization. The function takes an `EVT` (Extended Value Type) argument, which represents the type of the value being stored. The function first checks if the" LLVM,RISCV,2610,"The next statement after the `if` block is the `return V` statement. The `if` block checks whether the `transformAddShlImm` function returns a non-null value. If it does, the `if` block returns the value returned by `transformAddShlImm`. If it doesn't, the `if` block falls through to the next statement, which is the `return V` statement. Therefore, the next statement after the `if` block is the `return V` statement." LLVM,RISCV,2611,"The next statement after the `if` statement will be the `return` statement. The `if` statement checks whether the `transformAddShlImm` function returns a non-null value. If it does, the function returns the value returned by `transformAddShlImm`. If it doesn't, the function returns the result of the `combineSelectAndUseCommutative` function. Therefore, the next statement after the `if` statement will be the `return` statement that returns the result of the `combineSelectAndUseCommutative` function." LLVM,RISCV,2612,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the `combineSelectAndUseCommutative` function is not specified. However, based on the name of the function and the arguments passed to it, it is likely that the function combines the `select` and `use` statements in a way that is commutative, meaning that the order in which they are combined does not matter. Therefore, the next statement of the code snippet is likely to be the result of the `combineSelectAndUseCommutative` function, which could be a" LLVM,RISCV,2613,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be the return statement, which returns the result of the `combineSelectAndUseCommutative` function. The `combineSelectAndUseCommutative` function is called with the `N` node and the `DAG` object as arguments, and the `true` value is passed as the third argument to indicate that the operation is commutative. The return value of the function is then returned as the result of the `performANDCombine` function." LLVM,RISCV,2614,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `if (SetCCs.empty()) return SDValue();`. This statement checks if the `SetCCs` vector is empty, and if it is, it returns an empty `SDValue`." LLVM,RISCV,2615,"The next statement after the `if` statement in the code snippet you provided is: `return GREV;` This is because the `if` statement is checking whether the `combineORToGREV` function returns a non-null value, and if it does, the function returns that value. If the `combineORToGREV` function returns a null value, the `if` statement will not be executed, and the function will return `null`." LLVM,RISCV,2616,"Based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the `performORCombine` function is part of a compiler or code generator that is generating code for a specific instruction set architecture (ISA). The function takes a node `N` and a selection DAG `DAG`, and it checks if the target ISA has the `StdExtZbp` extension. If it does, the function tries to combine the `OR` operation into a `GREV`, `GORC`, or `SHFL` operation using the `combineORToGREV`, `combineORToGORC" LLVM,RISCV,2617,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `SDValue N0 = N -> getOperand ( ) ;` This statement retrieves the operand of the `SDNode` `N` at index ``, which is the first operand of the `SDNode`. The value of this operand is stored in the `SDValue` object `N0`." LLVM,RISCV,2618,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `combineSelectAndUse` function and the values of the `N`, `N1`, and `N0` variables. However, based on the names of the variables and the context of the code, it is likely that the next statement will be a call to the `combineSelectAndUse` function with the `N`, `N1`, and `N0` variables as arguments." LLVM,RISCV,2619,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet without knowing the context and the implementation of the `performXORCombine` function. However, based on the name of the function and the parameters it takes, it appears to be a function that combines two values using the XOR operation. Here are a few possibilities for what the next statement of this code snippet could be: 1. The function could be returning the result of the XOR operation, like this: ``` return N->getValue() ^ DAG->getValue(); ``` 2. The function could be storing the result" LLVM,RISCV,2620,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return ArgIdx.index();` Explanation: The code snippet is using the `enumerate` function to iterate over the `Args` vector, and the `for` loop is iterating over the indices of the vector. The loop is checking the type of each argument using the `VT` property of the argument, and if the argument is a vector and its element type is ``, the loop returns the index of the argument. Therefore, the next statement of the code snippet is the `return`" LLVM,RISCV,2621,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific input and the behavior of the `ArgIdx` and `ArgVT` objects. However, based on the code provided, it appears that the next statement will be: `ArgIdx.index()` This is because the `if` statement checks whether `ArgVT` is a vector and has a specific element type (which is not specified in the code snippet), and if so, it returns the index of the vector element. If the `if` statement is not satisfied, the" LLVM,RISCV,2622,The next statement after `return true ;` would be the end of the function or method. LLVM,RISCV,2623,"The next statement after the given code snippet is: return false;" LLVM,RISCV,2624,"The next statement after the given code snippet is: return false;" LLVM,RISCV,2625,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `SelectionDAG` and `SDNode` classes, as well as the input data. However, based on the name of the function `shouldExpandShift`, it appears that the function is checking whether a shift operation should be expanded or not. The function takes a `SelectionDAG` and an `SDNode` as input, and returns a boolean value indicating whether the shift operation should be expanded. Without knowing the specific implementation of the `SelectionDAG` and `" LLVM,RISCV,2626,The next statement after the `if` statement in the code snippet you provided is `return false;`. LLVM,RISCV,2627,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return IsSigned;` Explanation: The `shouldSignExtendTypeInLibCall` function checks if the type `Type` should be sign-extended in a library call. If the target is 64-bit and the type is `STR_LIT`, the function returns `true`. Otherwise, it returns the value of `IsSigned`. In this case, the `Type` is not `STR_LIT`, so the function will return the value of `IsSigned`, which is a boolean" LLVM,RISCV,2628,"The code snippet you provided is a C++ function that appears to be part of a larger program that is analyzing the uses of instructions in a program. The function is checking whether a particular instruction is a ""sinker"" instruction, which is defined as an instruction that has a specific form and is used in a specific way. The function takes two arguments: `I`, which is an instruction, and `OpIdx`, which is the index of an operand of `I`. The function returns `true` if `I` is a sinker instruction, and `false` otherwise. The function" LLVM,RISCV,2629,"The code snippet you provided is a part of a function that appears to be checking if an instruction is a sinker, and if it is, it is checking if the operands of the instruction match a certain pattern. Based on the code you provided, it is difficult to predict the next statement with certainty, as it depends on the specific inputs and the behavior of the functions being called. However, some possible next statements could be: * `return true;` if the instruction is a sinker and its operands match the expected pattern. * `return false;` if the instruction is not a sink" LLVM,RISCV,2630,"The next statement of this code snippet is: return DAG.getNode(, DL, VT, Lo, Hi, VL); This is because the if statement checks if the result of the bitwise right shift operation (LoC >> ) is equal to HiC. If it is not equal, then the else branch is executed, which returns the result of the getNode() method with the specified arguments." LLVM,RISCV,2631,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific values of the variables and the implementation of the `cast` and `getSExtValue` methods. However, based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the next statement will be a return statement, as the `if` condition is met and the `return` statement is executed. The `return` statement will return a node with the specified value, which is constructed using the `getNode` method of the `DAG` object. The `getNode` method takes four arguments: the first" LLVM,RISCV,2632,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `DAG` class and the values of the variables used in the code. However, based on the syntax and the methods called, it appears that the code is creating a new node in a directed acyclic graph (DAG) data structure. The `getNode` method is called on the `DAG` object, passing in several arguments: * The first argument is a string literal (``) that represents the name of the node. *" LLVM,RISCV,2633,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be: `unsigned Count = ValueVTBitSize / PartEltVT.getSizeInBits();` This is because the previous statement is checking if `PartVTBitSize` is a multiple of `ValueVTBitSize`, and if `ValueEltVT` is not equal to `PartEltVT`. If these conditions are true, then `Count` is assigned the value of `ValueVTBitSize` divided by the size of `PartEltVT` in bits." LLVM,RISCV,2634,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be: `return IsLegalMask(NewMask);` This is because the code is checking if the `NewMask` is a legal mask for the operation, and if it is not, it returns `false`. The `IsLegalMask` function is defined earlier in the code snippet, and it takes a single argument, `Mask`, which is an `APInt` object. The function returns a boolean value indicating whether the `Mask` is a legal mask for the operation. Therefore, the next statement of the code snippet is likely" LLVM,RISCV,2635,"The next statement of the code snippet is: `NewMask = NewMask.shl(MinSignedBits);` Explanation: The code snippet is a function that takes an `APInt` object as an argument and returns a boolean value. The function is used to check if a given mask is a legal mask for a particular operation. The function first checks if the mask is a signed integer with a specific number of bits (represented by ``). If it is not, the function returns `false`. If the mask is a signed" LLVM,RISCV,2636,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific values of the variables and the behavior of the `getNode` and `getConstant` methods. However, based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the next statement will be: `SDValue New2 = DAG.getNode(, DL, VT, New1, DAG.getConstant(C0, DL, VT));` This is because the `if` statement checks whether `(C1 % C0) ==" LLVM,RISCV,2637,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `SDValue NA0 = DAG.getNode(, DL, VT, NL, DAG.getConstant(Diff, DL, VT));` This statement creates a new node in the directed acyclic graph (DAG) with the given string literal, data layout, value type, and operands. The operands are `NL` and a constant node with the value `Diff`. The return value of this statement is an SDValue object representing the new node." LLVM,RISCV,2638,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `CC = ( CC ) ; std :: swap ( LHS , RHS ) ;` This statement is inside the `switch` block, and it is executed when the value of `CC` is equal to ``. The statement assigns the value of `CC` to a new string literal, and then swaps the values of `LHS` and `RHS` using the `std::swap` function." LLVM,RISCV,2639,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be: Hi = DAG.getLoad(, DL, Chain, FIN, MachinePointerInfo::getFixedStack(MF, FI)); This is because the code is checking if the location is a memory location and if so, it creates a fixed object and gets a frame index for it. Then, it loads the value from the memory location using the frame index and the machine pointer info. If the location is not a memory location, it is assumed to be a register location, and the code creates a virtual" LLVM,RISCV,2640,"Based on the code snippet provided, it is difficult to predict the next statement with certainty. However, based on the context and the information provided, it is likely that the next statement will be a case statement or a default statement. The code snippet is part of a function that is handling the assignment of a value to a location in memory. The function is using the LLVM IR builder API to create a fixed object and a frame index, and it is also using a switch statement to handle different cases for the location information. Therefore, the next statement is likely to be a case statement or a default statement" LLVM,RISCV,2641,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet without knowing the specific implementation of the `unpackFromRegLoc` function and the `SelectionDAG` and `MachineFunction` classes. However, based on the names of the variables and functions, it appears that the next statement may be related to unpacking a value from a register location. Here are a few possibilities: 1. The next statement may be a call to a function that unpacks the value from the register location. For example, it could be a call to `RegInfo.unpackFromRegLoc(VA," LLVM,RISCV,2642,"The next statement of this code snippet is: return VT.isVector() && VT.getVectorElementType().isInteger() && VT.getVectorElementType().getIntegerBitWidth() == 32; This statement checks if the input vector type `VT` is a fixed-length vector with 32-bit integer elements. If the condition is true, the function returns `true`, otherwise it returns `false`." LLVM,RISCV,2643,"The next statement after the `return` statement in the code snippet is the `useRVVForFixedLengthVectorVT` function call. This function is called with the `VT` and `Subtarget` arguments, and it is likely to perform some operations on the vector type `VT` based on the target machine `Subtarget`. The exact behavior of this function depends on the implementation of the `useRVVForFixedLengthVectorVT` function, which is not provided in the code snippet." LLVM,RISCV,2644,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be: `for (auto Reg : Regs) {` This is because the code is using the `any_of` algorithm to check if any of the registers in the `Regs` vector are reserved by the user. The `any_of` algorithm takes a lambda function as its second argument, which is used to test each element in the range. In this case, the lambda function is testing whether the register is reserved by the user by calling the `isRegisterReservedByUser` method of the `STI` object. If any" LLVM,RISCV,2645,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be: `for (auto Reg : Regs) {` This is because the code is using the `any_of` algorithm to check if any of the registers in the `Regs` vector are reserved by the user. The `any_of` algorithm takes a lambda function as its second argument, which is used to test each element in the range. In this case, the lambda function is testing whether the register is reserved by the user by calling the `isRegisterReservedByUser` method of the `STI` object. If any" LLVM,RISCV,2646,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty because it depends on the values of the variables `Opc`, `frm`, and `NUM_LIT`. However, based on the code snippet, it appears that the next statement will be a comparison between `Idx` and `NUM_LIT`. If `Idx` is less than `NUM_LIT`, the code will return. If `Idx` is greater than or equal to `NUM_LIT`, the code will continue executing the next statement." LLVM,RISCV,2647,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `Created.push_back(Cmp.getNode());` This statement adds the node `Cmp` to the `Created` vector, which is a vector of `SDNode` pointers. The `Created` vector is used to keep track of the nodes that are created during the lowering process." LLVM,RISCV,2648,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be: `SDValue Result = DAG.getNode(ISD::ANY_EXTEND, DL, NarrowVT, Op1);` This is because the code is trying to create a new node in the DAG (Directed Acyclic Graph) representing the result of the `ANY_EXTEND` operation, which is used to extend the value of a scalar to a vector. The `DAG.getNode` method is used to create a new node in the DAG, and the `ISD::AN" LLVM,RISCV,2649,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet without knowing the specific values of the variables and the implementation of the functions being called. However, based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the next statement will be a call to the `getNode` method of the `DAG` object, passing in the `NarrowVT` variable as the first argument, the `DL` variable as the second argument, and the result of the `getOperand` method called on `Op1` as the third argument. The `getNode` method is likely to return a new `SDValue` object" LLVM,RISCV,2650,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific inputs and the behavior of the `DAG` object. However, based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the next statement will be the `switch` statement, which will determine the next action based on the value of `Opc`. The `switch` statement will evaluate the value of `Opc` and execute the corresponding case statement. The possible values of `Opc` are: * ``: This case statement will be executed if `Opc` is" LLVM,RISCV,2651,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific values of the constants and variables used in the code. However, based on the information provided, it appears that the code is checking the value of a constant operand and determining whether it has a certain number of sign bits. If the operand has the expected number of sign bits, the code returns a specific value. Otherwise, it continues to the next case statement. The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be another case statement, as the code is using a switch statement to handle different cases." LLVM,RISCV,2652,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific values of the variables and the implementation of the `getNode` method. However, based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the next statement will likely be a call to the `getNode` method with the `WOpcode` variable as the first argument, followed by the `DL` variable, a string literal, and the `NewOp1` and `NewOp2` variables as the last two arguments. Here is a possible next statement: ``` SDValue NewRes = D" LLVM,RISCV,2653,"Based on the pattern of the code snippet, it appears that the next statement will be another case statement with a similar structure to the previous ones. Specifically, it will likely be a case statement that checks for a specific string literal and returns a value based on that check. Without more context or information about the code, it is difficult to provide a more specific prediction. However, based on the pattern of the code snippet, it is likely that the next statement will be another case statement that checks for a specific string literal and returns a value based on that check." LLVM,RISCV,2654,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it appears to be part of a larger program and the context is not provided. However, based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the next statement may be a call to the `BuildMI` function, which is used to build a machine instruction. The function takes several arguments, including a pointer to a `MachineInstr` object, a pointer to a `MachineBasicBlock` object, a pointer to a `DataLayout` object, and a string representing the opcode of the instruction to be built. The function returns a pointer" LLVM,RISCV,2655,"The next statement of this code snippet is: return JumpTableEncoding::Relative;" LLVM,RISCV,2656,"Based on the code snippet you provided, it seems like the next statement after the `default` case would be the `llvm_unreachable` function call. The `llvm_unreachable` function is a special function in LLVM that is used to indicate that a particular code path is unreachable. It is typically used in situations where the compiler can prove that a certain branch of code is never taken, and it is used to help the compiler optimize the code. In this case, the `default` case is not handling any specific integer value, so it is likely" LLVM,RISCV,2657,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty because the behavior of the code depends on the value of the `Opcode` variable, which is not specified in the code snippet. However, based on the structure of the code, it appears that the `switch` statement is used to handle different cases based on the value of `Opcode`. The `default` case is a catch-all case that is executed if none of the other cases match. In the `default` case, the code calls the `llvm_unreachable` function, which is a" LLVM,RISCV,2658,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `Info.opc = ;` This is because the code snippet is currently inside a `switch` statement, and the next `case` label is ``. The code will execute the statements associated with this `case` label, which includes the assignment of the `opc` field of the `Info` object to the string literal ``." LLVM,RISCV,2659,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific values of the variables and the implementation of the `SDValue` function. However, based on the code snippet provided, it is likely that the next statement will be: `return SDValue ( II ) ;` This is because the `II` pointer is being dereferenced in the `if` statement, and if it is not null, the `SDValue` function is being called with the dereferenced `II` pointer as an argument." LLVM,RISCV,2660,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet without knowing the specific implementation of the `TargetLowering` class and the `hasAndNotCompare` method. However, based on the name of the method, it appears to be related to checking if a given value has a specific property or feature. Without more information, it is not possible to provide a definitive answer to this question. If you have any additional context or details about the code snippet, I would be happy to try and assist you further." LLVM,RISCV,2661,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `if (VT == && !Subtarget.hasStdExtZfh()) return false;` This statement checks if the value type (VT) is equal to the string literal """" and if the subtarget does not have the standard extension for zero-filling halfwords (Zfh). If both conditions are true, the function returns false." LLVM,RISCV,2662,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `if (VT == && !Subtarget.hasStdExtZfh()) return false;` This statement checks if the value type (VT) is equal to the string literal """" and if the subtarget does not have the standard extension for handling floating-point immediate operands (hasStdExtZfh()). If this condition is true, the function returns false." LLVM,RISCV,2663,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `if (Srcs[0] < 0 || Srcs[1] < 0 || Srcs[0] == Srcs[1]) return false;` This statement checks if any of the elements in the `Srcs` array are less than 0, or if the first and second elements are equal. If any of these conditions are true, the function returns `false`." LLVM,RISCV,2664,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be: `return LD->getMemoryVT() == VT2;` This is because the `isZExtFree` method is checking if the load operation is zero-extended, and the `getMemoryVT` method returns the memory type of the load operation. If the memory type is the same as the expected type `VT2`, then the load operation is zero-extended and the method returns `true`." LLVM,RISCV,2665,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet without knowing the specific values of the variables and the context in which the code is being executed. However, based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the next statement will be a call to the `getNode` method of the `DAG` object, passing in the `ValueVT` and `Val` variables as arguments. The `getNode` method is used to create a new node in the DAG, and it is called with the `ValueVT` and `Val` variables as arguments to create a new node with the `" LLVM,RISCV,2666,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return MCSymbolRefExpr :: create ( MBB -> getSymbol ( ) , Ctx ) ;` This statement creates a new `MCSymbolRefExpr` object and returns it. The `MCSymbolRefExpr` class is used to represent symbolic references in the LLVM IR. The `create` method takes two arguments: the first is the symbol to be referenced, and the second is the context in which the reference is being made. In this case, the symbol being referenced is the symbol for the machine basic block (`MBB`)" LLVM,RISCV,2667,"The next statement is likely to be: `return MCSymbolRefExpr::create(MBB->getSymbol(), Ctx);` This is because the `assert` statement is checking the conditions for creating a `MCSymbolRefExpr` object, and if all the conditions are met, the `create` method is called to create the object. The `return` statement is then used to return the created object." LLVM,RISCV,2668,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet without knowing the context and the specific values of the variables used in the code. However, based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the next statement will be a call to the `DAG.getNode()` method, which is used to create a new node in the directed acyclic graph (DAG) representing the data flow of the program. The `DAG.getNode()` method takes several arguments, including the name of the node, the data type of the node, and the inputs to the node. The name of the node is" LLVM,RISCV,2669,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `SDValue ScalarSplat = lowerScalarSplat(ScalarVal, DAG.getConstant(, DL, XLenVT), M1VT, DL, DAG, Subtarget);` This statement is calling the `lowerScalarSplat` function, which is used to lower a scalar splat operation. The function takes several arguments, including the scalar value to splat, the constant value to use as the splat value, the M1VT value," LLVM,RISCV,2670,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of the code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific values of the variables and the implementation of the functions involved. However, based on the context and the names of the variables, it appears that the next statement is likely to be a call to the `getLMUL1VT` function, which is used to get the LMUL1VT value for the given vector value type. Here is a possible next statement: ``` MVT M1VT = getLMUL1VT(VectorVal.getSimpleValueType());" LLVM,RISCV,2671,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be: `return FpToInt;` This is because the code snippet is setting up the parameters for a call to the `getNode` method of the `DAG` object, which is likely to return an `SDValue` object representing the result of the operation. The `FpToInt` variable is the last statement in the code snippet, and it is being set to the result of the `getNode` call, so it is likely that the next statement will be to return this value." LLVM,RISCV,2672,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it appears to be part of a larger program and the context is not provided. However, based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the next statement may be related to the creation of a constant floating-point value. The code snippet defines a variable `MaxVal` of type `APFloat`, which is a class for representing floating-point numbers. The variable `Precision` is defined as the precision of the floating-point number, which is determined by the `APFloat::semanticsPrecision` function." LLVM,RISCV,2673,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet as it appears to be a part of a larger function and the context is not provided. However, based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the function is performing some kind of data processing or manipulation, possibly related to bit manipulation or arithmetic. The function takes in a number of parameters, including a `DAG` object, a `DL` object, an `XLenVT` object, and an `Op` object. It also uses a number of constants, including `` and `" LLVM,RISCV,2674,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `SDValue VL = DAG.getConstant(VT.getVectorNumElements(), DL, XLenVT);` This statement creates a new SDValue `VL` that represents the number of elements in the vector `VT`. The `getConstant` method is called on the `DAG` object, passing in the number of elements in `VT` as the first argument, the `DL` object as the second argument, and the `XLenVT` object as the third argument. The resulting `SD" LLVM,RISCV,2675,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet without knowing the specific values of the placeholders and the context in which the code is being executed. However, based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the next statement will be a call to the `convertFromScalableVector` function, which is used to convert a scalable vector to a non-scalable vector. The `convertFromScalableVector` function takes several arguments, including the vector to be converted, the target vector type, and the data layout. The function returns a new vector that is equivalent to the original vector, but" LLVM,RISCV,2676,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet without knowing the context and the specific implementation of the functions being called. However, based on the names of the functions and the variables being used, it appears that the code is working with vectors and containers, and is converting between different types of vectors. The `getContainerForFixedLengthVector` function seems to be returning a container that can hold a fixed-length vector, and the `convertToScalableVector` function is converting a vector to a scalable vector. The `SDLoc` function is likely creating a location for the vector. With" LLVM,RISCV,2677,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific values of the variables and the behavior of the functions being called. However, based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the next statement will be: `Val = DAG.getNode(MaskOpc, DL, ContainerVT, Op1, Op2, VL);` This statement is creating a new node in the DAG (Directed Acyclic Graph) using the `getNode` method of the `DAG` object. The node is being created with the" LLVM,RISCV,2678,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `Index = DAG . getNode ( , DL , IndexVT , Index , TrueMask , VL ) ;` This statement is a call to the `getNode` method of the `DAG` object, which creates a new node in the DAG. The node is created with the `IndexVT` type, and the `Index` and `TrueMask` values are passed as arguments. The `VL` value is also passed as an argument, but it is not used in this statement." LLVM,RISCV,2679,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it appears to be part of a larger program and the context is not provided. However, based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the next statement may be related to the handling of a masked load operation. The code snippet defines several variables, including `Mask`, `PassThru`, and `VL`, which are likely to be used in the next statement. The `Mask` variable is initialized to the mask of the load operation, while the `PassThru` variable is initialized to a pass-through value." LLVM,RISCV,2680,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `Ops.push_back(VL);`" LLVM,RISCV,2681,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return DAG.getNode(, DL, VT, Scalar, VL);` This statement is executed if the condition `isOneConstant(VL) && (!Const || isNullConstant(Scalar) || !isInt(Const->getSExtValue()))` is true. In this statement, `DAG.getNode` is called with the following arguments: * ``: The string literal representing the name of the" LLVM,RISCV,2682,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `SDValue NeutralElem = DAG.getNeutralElement(BaseOpc, DL, VecEltVT, SDNodeFlags());` This statement retrieves the neutral element for the given base operation, data layout, and vector element type, and stores it in the `NeutralElem` variable. The neutral element is a value that can be used as a placeholder or a default value in certain operations, such as addition or multiplication." LLVM,RISCV,2683,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be the definition of the `RVVOpcode` variable, which is used in the `DAG.getNode()` method to create a new node in the DAG. The `RVVOpcode` variable is likely to be a member of the `RVVOpcode` enum, which is used to represent the opcode of a vector reduction operation in the DAG. The `RVVOpcode` enum is likely to be defined in the `llvm/IR/RVVOpcode.h` header file, and" LLVM,RISCV,2684,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be a call to the `getSplatOperand` method of the `II` object, which is an instance of the `const *` class. The method is called with the `SplatOp` variable as its argument, and it is expected to return a value of type `SDValue`. The purpose of this method is to retrieve the splat operand of the instruction, which is the operand that is repeated multiple times in the instruction. The `SplatOp` variable is used to determine which oper" LLVM,RISCV,2685,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `SDValue Elt0 = DAG . getNode ( , DL , ResVT , Reduction , DAG . getConstant ( , DL , XLenVT ) ) ;` This statement creates a new SDValue called `Elt0` by calling the `getNode` method of the `DAG` object with the following arguments: * `STR_LIT`: The name of the instruction to be executed. * `DL`: The data" LLVM,RISCV,2686,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be a call to the `getRVVVPReductionOp` function, which is used to get the reduction operation for the given vector type. The function takes the opcode of the reduction operation as an argument and returns the corresponding reduction operation for the RVV vector type. The code snippet is trying to lower a vector reduction operation, and it is checking if the vector type is legal for the target architecture. If the vector type is not legal, it returns an empty `SDValue`. Otherwise, it gets the vector element type and the container type for" LLVM,RISCV,2687,The next statement of this code snippet is `return ;`. LLVM,RISCV,2688,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return Shift;` This is because the `for` loop is iterating over the values of `Shift` from `NUM_LIT` to `Size - 1`, and the `if` statement inside the loop checks if `CheckUndefs(Shift)` and `MatchShift(Shift)` are both true. If both conditions are true, the loop will return `Shift`. If either condition is false, the loop will continue to the next iteration." LLVM,RISCV,2689,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific values of the variables and the behavior of the `DAG` object. However, based on the information provided, it appears that the code is attempting to perform a conversion from a floating-point value to an integer value. The `Opc` variable is being set to a value based on the values of `VT` and `IsSigned`. If `VT` is equal to `XLenVT`, then `Opc` is set to a specific value. Otherwise, `Opc" LLVM,RISCV,2690,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be: `SDValue Result = DAG.getNode(Opc, DL, DstVT, FpToInt, ZeroInt);` This is because the previous lines of code have set up the necessary values and parameters for the `getNode` method, and the next step is to call the method and assign the result to a variable. The `Opc` variable is the opcode for the node, `DL` is the debug location, `DstVT` is the destination type, `FpToInt` is" LLVM,RISCV,2691,"Based on the code snippet you provided, it appears to be a part of a function that is performing some kind of type checking and conversion. It is difficult to predict the next statement with certainty without knowing the context and the purpose of the function. However, based on the code you provided, it seems likely that the next statement will be a call to a function that performs the actual conversion or type checking. The code snippet you provided is using a number of variables and functions that are not defined in the code you provided, so it is difficult to give a more specific answer. However, based on the names of the variables" LLVM,RISCV,2692,"The next statement after the `switch` statement is the `default` case, which returns `false`." LLVM,RISCV,2693,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return false;` This is because the `default` case in the `switch` statement is reached, and the `default` case returns `false`." LLVM,RISCV,2694,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `DAG` class and the `getNode` method. However, based on the code provided, it appears that the next statement will be a call to the `getNode` method of the `DAG` class, passing in the string literal `""""`, the `DL` object, the `VT` object, and the `InterVec` object. The `getNode` method will then return a new node object that represents the result of the operation." LLVM,RISCV,2695,"Based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the next statement will be: `ValueEltVT = ValueVT.getVectorElementType();` This is because the code is checking if `ValueVT` is a scalable vector and `PartVT` is a scalable vector, and if so, it is getting the vector element type of `ValueVT` and `PartVT` using the `getVectorElementType()` method." LLVM,RISCV,2696,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be: Op0 = DAG.getNode(ExtOpc, DL, NarrowVT, Op0, Mask, VL); This is because the code is checking the value type of Op0 and Op1, and if they are not equal to NarrowVT, it is creating a new node using the ExtOpc instruction. The Mask parameter is also being passed to the getNode() function, which suggests that the node being created is a masked operation." LLVM,RISCV,2697,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `Op0 = Op0.getOperand();` This line retrieves the operand of `Op0` at index ``, which is a constant integer value. The value of this operand is then stored in the variable `Op0`." LLVM,RISCV,2698,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `if (Addend != SeqAddend) return None;`" LLVM,RISCV,2699,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return Builder.CreateCall(LrwOpScwLoop, {AlignedAddr, Incr, Mask, Ordering});` This statement calls the `CreateCall` method of the `IRBuilder` class, passing in the `LrwOpScwLoop` function and a list of arguments. The `LrwOpScwLoop` function is a function that has been defined earlier in the code snippet, and it is used to perform a masked atomic read-modify-write operation on a memory location. The `Create" LLVM,RISCV,2700,"The next statement in the code snippet is: case AtomicRMWInst :: Min : return ;" LLVM,RISCV,2701,"The next statement in this code snippet is: case AtomicRMWInst :: UMin : return ;" LLVM,RISCV,2702,"Based on the code snippet you provided, it appears to be a part of a switch statement that is handling different cases for different types of memory operations. The next statement in the code snippet is likely to be a case statement for the next type of memory operation, such as a store or a load. The case statement will likely include a check for the type of the memory operation and a call to a function to handle that type of operation. Without more context, it is difficult to provide a more specific answer. Can you provide more information about the code snippet or the context in which it is being used?" LLVM,RISCV,2703,"Based on the code snippet provided, it is difficult to predict the next statement with certainty. However, based on the context and the patterns observed in the code, it is likely that the next statement will be another call to the `setOperationAction` function, passing in a string literal, the `XLenVT` variable, and the `Expand` variable. The `setOperationAction` function appears to be used to set the action for a specific operation, and the `XLenVT` variable is likely a variable that represents the length of the operation. The `Expand` variable is likely a variable" LLVM,RISCV,2704,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `if (Size == 32) {`" LLVM,RISCV,2705,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the code depends on the values of the variables `Size` and ``. However, based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the function is checking if the `Size` variable is equal to one of two specific values, and if so, it is returning a value of type `AtomicExpansionKind`." LLVM,RISCV,2706,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific values of the string literals and the input to the function. However, based on the pattern of the code, it is likely that the next statement will be another `case` statement with a string literal and a corresponding `return` statement." LLVM,RISCV,2707,"It is difficult to predict the next statement with certainty, as it depends on the specific values of the string literals and the input to the function. However, based on the pattern of the code snippet, it is likely that the next statement will be another `case` statement, with a string literal as the condition and a string literal as the return value." LLVM,RISCV,2708,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `case :` This is the start of a new case label in the switch statement. The code inside this case label will be executed if the value of the switch expression is equal to the value of the `` constant." LLVM,RISCV,2709,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it appears to be part of a larger function and the context is not provided. However, based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the next statement will be a case statement for the opcode. The code snippet is part of a function that appears to be handling a specific type of operation on a data structure, possibly a bitwise operation. The function takes a node as an argument, and based on the opcode of the node, it performs a specific operation. The function uses the `DAG" LLVM,RISCV,2710,"The next statement after the code snippet you provided is likely to be another `case` statement, as the code is using a `switch` statement with multiple `case` labels. Here's a possible next statement: ``` case : assert(N->getValueType() == && Subtarget->is64Bit() && Subtarget->hasStdExtM() && ); break; ``` This next statement is similar to the previous one, but with a different" LLVM,RISCV,2711,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `setOperationAction(, XLenVT, Custom)`" LLVM,RISCV,2712,"Based on the code snippet provided, it is difficult to predict the next statement with certainty. However, based on the context and the patterns observed in the code, it is likely that the next statement will be another call to `setOperationAction` or `setCondCodeAction`, with the same or similar arguments as the previous calls. The code appears to be setting up a table of operations and their corresponding actions for a processor or coprocessor, with the `setOperationAction` and `setCondCodeAction` functions being used to specify the actions for different operations and condition codes. The `FPCCTo" LLVM,RISCV,2713,The next statement after `return true ;` would be the end of the function or method. LLVM,RISCV,2714,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be: `Value * Result = Builder.CreateCall(Intrinsic::masked_atomic_cmpxchg, {AlignedAddr, CmpVal, NewVal, Mask, Ordering});` This is because the `emitMaskedAtomicCmpXchgIntrinsic` method is responsible for generating the code for the `masked_atomic_cmpxchg` intrinsic, which is a low-level atomic operation that compares and exchanges a value with a mask. The `Builder`" LLVM,RISCV,2715,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific values of the variables and the behavior of the `DCI` and `SDValue` classes. However, based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the next statement will be: `return DCI.CombineTo(N, Op0.getOperand(), Op0.getOperand());` This is because the code checks the opcode of `Op0` and breaks if it is not equal to `<" LLVM,RISCV,2716,"Based on the code snippet you provided, it appears to be a part of a larger program that is setting up the stack pointer register and defining various actions for different operations. The next statement in the code snippet is: `setOperationAction(, XLenVT, Expand);` This line sets the operation action for a specific operation (represented by ``) to ""Expand"" for a specific vector type (represented by `XLenVT`)." LLVM,RISCV,2717,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `State.addLoc(CCValAssign::getReg(VA1.getValNo(), VA1.getValVT(), Reg, VA1.getLocVT(), CCValAssign::Full));` This statement is adding a location to the `State` object using the `addLoc` method. The location is specified by the `CCValAssign::getReg` method, which returns a register location for the given value number, value type, and register. The `Reg` variable is the register that was allocated" LLVM,RISCV,2718,"The next statement in this code snippet is: `if (LocVT == ) {` This is because the previous `if` statement has two conditions that are both false, so the `else` block is executed. The first condition is `LocVT == `, which is false because `LocVT` is not equal to ``. The second condition is `LocVT == `, which is also false because `LocVT` is not equal to ``." LLVM,RISCV,2719,"The next statement in this code snippet is: `State.addLoc(CCValAssign::getReg(ValNo, ValVT, Reg, LocVT, LocInfo));`" LLVM,RISCV,2720,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the code depends on the values of the variables and the specific implementation of the functions being called. However, we can make some educated guesses based on the information provided: * `VectorBits` is a variable that appears to be a bit vector, and is being divided by `EltSize` to get the number of elements in the vector. * `MinSize` is a variable that appears to be a minimum size, and is being multiplied by the result of the division to get a larger size" LLVM,RISCV,2721,"The next statement of this code snippet is: return VLOperand != ;" LLVM,RISCV,2722,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it appears to be part of a larger function and the context is not provided. However, based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the next statement will be a case statement for the case. In this case, the code will assert that the subtarget is not 64-bit and that the operand is a string literal. It will then create a new node with the opcode and two operands, the first being the result of a getNode() call" LLVM,RISCV,2723,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be: `LocVT = XLenVT;` This is because the previous statement is an `assert` statement, which is a debugging tool that checks for a condition and raises an error if it is not met. The `assert` statement is used to check that the size of `PendingLocs` is equal to the size of `PendingArgFlags`, and that both vectors are not empty. After the `assert` statement, the code snippet assigns the value of `XLenVT` to `LocVT" LLVM,RISCV,2724,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `if ( ArgFlags . isSplit ( ) || ! PendingLocs . empty ( ) ) {` This is because the `if` statement on line 10 checks whether `ArgFlags` is split or if `PendingLocs` is empty. If either of these conditions is true, then the code inside the `if` block will be executed." LLVM,RISCV,2725,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `DAG` and `RetOps` classes, as well as the values of the variables `Chain`, `DL`, `VA`, `Val`, `Flag`, and ``. However, based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the next statement will be `RetOps[] = Chain;`. This is because the code snippet ends with the statement `RetOps.push_back(Flag);`, which" LLVM,RISCV,2726,"Based on the code snippet you provided, it appears to be a part of a larger program that is setting up actions for various operations and condition codes. The next statement in the code snippet is: setOperationAction ( , XLenVT , Expand ) ; This statement sets the action for an operation with the given name (represented by ) and the given vector type (represented by XLenVT) to ""Expand""." LLVM,RISCV,2727,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `Info.opc = ;` This statement assigns the value of `` to the `opc` field of the `Info` structure." LLVM,RISCV,2728,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific values of the variables and the behavior of the functions being called. However, based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the next statement will be a call to the `getNode` method of the `DAG` object, passing in the `VecEltVT` type, the `DL` object, and the result of the `getConstant` method of the `DAG` object as arguments. The `getConstant` method is called with the `Subtarget.getXLenV" LLVM,RISCV,2729,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific values of the variables and the behavior of the functions being called. However, based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the next statement will be a call to the `getNode` method of the `DAG` object, passing in the `VecEltVT` type, the `DL` object, and the result of the `getConstant` method of the `DAG` object as arguments. The `getConstant` method is called with the `Subtarget.getXLenV" LLVM,RISCV,2730,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `SDValue Vec = DAG.getBitcast(I32VT, Op.getOperand(NumOps - OpOffset));` This statement is a bitcast operation that converts the operand at position `NumOps - OpOffset` from its current type to the type `I32VT`. The result of the bitcast is stored in the variable `Vec`." LLVM,RISCV,2731,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `SDValue Result = DAG . getMemIntrinsicNode ( , DL , VTs , Ops , MGN -> getMemoryVT ( ) , MGN -> getMemOperand ( ) ) ;` This line of code creates a new `SDValue` called `Result` by calling the `getMemIntrinsicNode` method of the `DAG` object, passing in the following arguments: * ``: A string literal representing the name of the memory" LLVM,RISCV,2732,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be: `VL = DAG.getNode(ISD::SCALAR_TO_VECTOR, SDLoc(N), ContainerVT, Index);` This statement is creating a new node in the DAG (Directed Acyclic Graph) representing the operation of converting a scalar value to a vector value. The node is created using the `ISD::SCALAR_TO_VECTOR` opcode, which is a built-in opcode in the LLVM IR that represents this operation. The `SDLoc" LLVM,RISCV,2733,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `VL = DAG.getConstant(VT.getVectorNumElements(), DL, XLenVT);` This statement is inside the `if` block, which means that it will only be executed if `VT.isFixedLengthVector()` returns `true`. If `VT` is a fixed-length vector, then `VL` will be set to a constant value that represents the number of elements in the vector. Otherwise, if `VT` is not a fixed-length vector, then `VL` will" LLVM,RISCV,2734,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific inputs and the behavior of the `getPassThru` and `convertToScalableVector` functions. However, based on the code provided, it is likely that the next statement will be: `VL = DAG.getRegister(, XLenVT);` This is because the `if` statement checks whether `VT` is a fixed-length vector, and if it is, it sets `ContainerVT` to the container for fixed-length" LLVM,RISCV,2735,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `Ops.push_back(VL);` This statement adds the `VL` value to the `Ops` vector. The `Ops` vector is a collection of operands for the instruction that is being generated by the code snippet. The `VL` value is the number of elements in the vector, and it is being added to the `Ops` vector as the second operand." LLVM,RISCV,2736,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific values of the variables and the implementation of the `convertToScalableVector` and `getTargetConstant` functions. However, based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the next statement will be a call to the `getRegister` function, passing in the `XLenVT` variable as an argument." LLVM,RISCV,2737,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be: `SDValue Lo = Op.getOperand(0);` This is because the code is currently checking the number of operands of the `Op` object, and if it is equal to 2, it will retrieve the first operand using `getOperand(0)`." LLVM,RISCV,2738,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be: `Vec = DAG.getNode(BaseOpc, DL, VecEVT, Lo, Hi);` This is because the `while` loop is checking the type of the vector `Vec` and splitting it into two parts, `Lo` and `Hi`, if it is a vector of type `TargetLowering::TypeSplitVector`. The `if` statement at the end of the loop checks if the type of the vector `Vec` is legal, and if it is not, returns an empty `SDValue`." LLVM,RISCV,2739,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet without knowing the specific values of the variables and the context in which the code is being executed. However, based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the next statement will be a call to the `getSExtOrTrunc` method of the `DAG` object, which is used to extend or truncate a value to a specified type. The method takes four arguments: the value to be extended or truncated, the data layout, the type to which the value should be extended or truncated, and a flag indicating whether the value should be extended or" LLVM,RISCV,2740,"Based on the code snippet you provided, it appears to be a part of a switch statement that is handling different cases for a specific operation. The next statement is likely to be another case statement or the default statement. Without more context, it is difficult to predict the exact next statement, but based on the code snippet you provided, it seems that the next statement will be related to handling a specific operation or condition." LLVM,RISCV,2741,"The next statement of this code snippet is: * Fast = true;" LLVM,RISCV,2742,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `if (Opcode == && !N->getFlags().hasAllowReassociation()) return SDValue();` This statement checks if the opcode of the node `N` is `` and if the `AllowReassociation` flag is not set. If either of these conditions is true, the function returns an empty `SDValue`." LLVM,RISCV,2743,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `if (Opcode == && N->getFlags().hasNoSignedZeros() && isNullFPConstant(V)) return true;` This is a conditional statement that checks if the opcode is a specific value (represented by ``), and if the node's flags have the `hasNoSignedZeros()` flag set, and if the value `V` is a null floating-point constant. If all of these conditions are true, the function returns `true`." LLVM,RISCV,2744,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific values of the variables and the behavior of the functions being called. However, based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the next statement will be a call to the `getNode` method of the `DAG` object, passing in the `WOpcode` and `NewOps` variables as arguments. The `getNode` method is likely to return a new node object that represents the result of the operation being performed." LLVM,RISCV,2745,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be the creation of a new machine basic block (MBB) for the `IfFalse` branch. The code creates a new MBB using the `CreateMachineBasicBlock` method of the `MachineFunction` class, and then adds it as a successor of the current MBB using the `addSuccessor` method. The code then transfers the successors of the current MBB to the new MBB using the `transferSuccessorsAndUpdatePHIs` method, and adds the new MBB as a successor of the current MBB using the `" LLVM,RISCV,2746,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `TailMBB->splice(TailMBB->end(), HeadMBB, std::next(LastSelectPseudo->getIterator()), HeadMBB->end());` This statement is splicing the instructions from `HeadMBB` into `TailMBB`, starting from the instruction after `LastSelectPseudo` and ending at the end of `HeadMBB`." LLVM,RISCV,2747,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be the creation of a new `SDValue` object representing the mask of all ones for the given vector type `VecVT`. The `getAllOnesMask` function is likely to be called with the vector type `VecVT` as an argument, and it will return a new `SDValue` object that represents the mask of all ones for that vector type. Here is an example of what the next statement of this code snippet might look like: ``` SDValue mask = getAllOnesMask(VecVT, VL, D" LLVM,RISCV,2748,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `unsigned NumElts = (VT.getVectorNumElements() * ) / MinVLen;` This line of code calculates the number of elements in the vector by dividing the number of elements in the vector by the minimum vector length. The result is stored in the `NumElts` variable." LLVM,RISCV,2749,"Based on the code snippet you provided, it appears that the next statement will be a case statement for the `MVT` enum. The `MVT` enum is used to represent the type of a vector element, and the code is switching on the `SimpleTy` field of the `MVT` enum to determine the type of the vector element. The `MVT` enum is defined in the LLVM source code as follows: ``` enum MVT { MVT_INVALID, MVT_VOID, MVT_" LLVM,RISCV,2750,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `SDValue Mask = getAllOnesMask(ContainerVT, VL, DL, DAG);` This statement is calling the `getAllOnesMask` function, which is used to generate a mask with all ones for the given container type, vector length, and data layout. The function takes four arguments: * `ContainerVT`: the container type (e.g. `VectorType`) * `VL`: the vector length (e.g. `4`) * `DL`: the data layout (" LLVM,RISCV,2751,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `getMaskTypeFor` function and the values of the `VecVT` parameter. However, based on the name of the function and the parameter, it is likely that the function is used to determine the mask type for a given vector type. The function may use the `VecVT` parameter to determine the type of the vector and then return the corresponding mask type. Without more information about the specific implementation of the function, it is not possible to provide a more" LLVM,RISCV,2752,"The next statement after the code snippet you provided is: `assert(EC > 0);`" LLVM,RISCV,2753,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `int Srcs[2] = { -1, -1 };` This line declares an array of two integers named `Srcs` and initializes it with the values `-1` and `-1`." LLVM,RISCV,2754,"Based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the next statement will be: `return false;` The code is checking if the `BaseOffs` field of the `AM` struct is not an integer, and if it is not, it returns `false`. If the `BaseOffs` field is an integer, it checks the value of the `Scale` field of the `AM` struct. If the `Scale` field is equal to a specific value (represented by `` in the code snippet), it breaks out of the switch statement. If the `Scale" LLVM,RISCV,2755,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet without knowing the specific implementation of the `TargetLowering` class and the `isOffsetFoldingLegal` method. However, based on the name of the method, it appears that it is checking whether a certain operation involving a global address is legal. Here are a few possibilities for what the next statement of this code snippet could be: 1. Checking the validity of the global address: The next statement could check whether the global address `GA` is valid and can be used in the current context. 2. Checking the" LLVM,RISCV,2756,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `ContainerVT = getContainerForFixedLengthVector(VecVT);` This line of code assigns the result of the `getContainerForFixedLengthVector` function, which takes a vector type `VecVT` as an argument, to the variable `ContainerVT`. The `getContainerForFixedLengthVector` function is not defined in the code snippet, so it is not possible to determine what it does. However, based on the name of the function, it appears to be related to getting a container for a fixed-length vector." LLVM,RISCV,2757,"The next statement of this code snippet is: SDValue Result = DAG.getNode(ISD::SELECT, DL, ContainerVT, Cmp, Op1, Op2);" LLVM,RISCV,2758,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet without knowing the specific values of the variables and the implementation of the functions being called. However, based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the next statement will be a call to the `getAddr` function, passing in the `N` variable, the `DAG` variable, and the `IsLocal` variable. The `getAddr` function is not defined in the code snippet provided, so it is not possible to determine what it does or what its return value will be. However, based on the name of the function, it" LLVM,RISCV,2759,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `getOffset` and `getGlobal` methods, as well as the value of the `N` variable. However, based on the syntax and the context of the code, it is likely that the next statement will be a call to the `getGlobal` method on the `N` object, and the result of that call will be assigned to the `GV` variable. Therefore, the next statement of this code snippet is likely to be: ``` GV = N" LLVM,RISCV,2760,"Based on the code snippet you provided, it appears to be related to the lowering of global thread-local storage (TLS) addresses in a compiler. The code is using the SDValue class to represent values in the compiler's intermediate representation, and it is using the SelectionDAG class to represent the data flow graph of the program being compiled. The code is checking the TLS model of the global variable being accessed and generating code to load the address of the variable based on the TLS model. If the TLS model is LocalExec, the code generates a static TLS address, and if the TLS model is InitialExec" LLVM,RISCV,2761,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `SDValue VL = DAG . getConstant ( VT . getVectorNumElements ( ) , DL , XLenVT ) ;` This line of code creates a new `SDValue` object called `VL` and initializes it with the constant value of the number of elements in the vector `VT`. The `getVectorNumElements()` method is called on the `VT` object to get the number of elements in the vector, and the `getConstant()` method is called on the `DAG` object" LLVM,RISCV,2762,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet without knowing the specific values of the placeholders, such as ``, ``, and ``. However, based on the structure of the code, it appears to be a switch statement that handles different cases based on the value of the `Op` object. The first case checks if the `Op` object is of type ``, and if so, it returns a node with the value of the `Op` object. The second case checks if the `Op" LLVM,RISCV,2763,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be the start of a new case statement, as the current one is not closed with a closing brace. The code snippet is part of a switch statement, and the next case statement is likely to be a new case label with a different value. The code snippet is also part of a function that appears to be handling a memory intrinsic, so the next case statement is likely to be related to a different type of memory intrinsic or a different aspect of the same memory intrinsic. Without more context, it is difficult to provide a more specific answer." LLVM,RISCV,2764,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `MVT MaskVT = getMaskTypeFor(ContainerVT);` This statement is assigning the `MaskVT` variable to the result of the `getMaskTypeFor` function, which takes the `ContainerVT` variable as an argument. The `getMaskTypeFor` function is not defined in the code snippet, so it is not possible to determine what it does or what its return value represents. However, based on the context of the code, it appears that `MaskVT` is being used to represent the type of" LLVM,RISCV,2765,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `SmallVector> Ops { Chain, DAG.getTargetConstant(IntID, DL, XLenVT) };` This line creates a new `SmallVector` object called `Ops` and initializes it with two elements: `Chain` and the result of `DAG.getTargetConstant(IntID, DL, XLenVT)`. The `SmallVector` class is a lightweight container class that is used to store a small number of" LLVM,RISCV,2766,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be: `Index = DAG.getNode(, DL, IndexVT, Index, TrueMask, VL);` This statement is creating a new node in the DAG (Directed Acyclic Graph) representing the operation of indexing into the vector `Val` using the index vector `Index` and the mask `TrueMask`. The `DAG.getNode` method is used to create the node, and the arguments passed to it are: * ``: The opcode" LLVM,RISCV,2767,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `if (IsUnmasked) {` This is because the `IsUnmasked` variable is set to `true` if the `Mask` operand is a constant node with a value of `1`, and the `if` statement checks whether `IsUnmasked` is `true`. If it is, the code inside the `if` block will be executed." LLVM,RISCV,2768,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `Src = DAG.getNode(ConvOpc, DL, ContainerVT, Src, Mask, VL);` This statement is a call to the `getNode` method of the `DAG` object, which creates a new node in the DAG with the specified opcode, data layout, and operands. The `ConvOpc` variable is the opcode for the conversion operation, and the `ContainerVT` variable is the vector type of the result. The `Src` variable is the" LLVM,RISCV,2769,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `Vec = DAG.getNode(, DL, I32VT, Passthru, Vec, ScalarHi, I32Mask, I32VL);` This statement is a call to the `getNode` method of the `DAG` object, which creates a new node in the DAG. The node is of type `I32VT`, and its inputs are `Passthru`, `Vec`, `ScalarHi`, `I32Mask`," LLVM,RISCV,2770,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific values of the variables and the behavior of the `convertToScalableVector` and `getDefaultVLOps` functions. However, based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the next statement will be: `SDValue SplatOne = DAG . getConstant ( , DL , Subtarget . getXLenVT ( ) ) ;` This statement is creating a new `SDValue` object called `SplatOne` and" LLVM,RISCV,2771,"The next statement of the code snippet is: `Result = Src;` This is because the code is currently assigning the value of `Src` to the variable `Result`. The next statement after this would be the `if` statement that checks if `IsVPTrunc` is true." LLVM,RISCV,2772,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `SrcEltVT = ( SrcEltVT . getSizeInBits ( ) / ) ;` This statement is assigning a new value to the `SrcEltVT` variable, which is a vector element type. The new value is calculated by dividing the size of the `SrcEltVT` vector element type by a constant value. The purpose of this statement is to update the `SrcEltVT` variable to reflect the" LLVM,RISCV,2773,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific values of the variables and the behavior of the `DAG` object. However, based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the next statement will be: `SDValue UpOffset = DAG.getNode(, DL, XLenVT, VLMax, DownOffset);` This is because the `if` statement checks whether `ImmValue` is greater than or equal to a certain value, and if it is, it sets `DownOffset" LLVM,RISCV,2774,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific values of the variables and the behavior of the functions being called. However, based on the context and the code snippet provided, it is likely that the next statement will be related to the conversion of the source value to a scalable vector. The code snippet defines a variable `Src` as an `SDValue` and initializes it with the result of calling the `getOperand` method on the `Op` object with an argument of ``. It also defines a variable `" LLVM,RISCV,2775,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `SDValue Result = DAG . getNode ( , DL , ContainerVT , Src , Splat , ZeroSplat , VL ) ;` This statement creates a new node in the DAG with the given opcode, data layout, and operands. The opcode is represented by the `` placeholder, which is a string literal that represents the opcode of the instruction being generated. The data layout is represented by the `DL` variable, which is a `DataLayout" LLVM,RISCV,2776,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific values of the variables and the behavior of the functions being called. However, based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the next statement will be: Ops.push_back(convertToScalableVector(ContainerVT, V, DAG, Subtarget)); This is because the code snippet is currently inside a loop that is iterating over the elements of a vector called ""Ops"", and the next statement after the ""continue"" statement is a call to the ""push_back" LLVM,RISCV,2777,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `MVT ContainerVT = getContainerForFixedLengthVector(VT);` This statement is assigning the result of the `getContainerForFixedLengthVector` function to the `ContainerVT` variable, which is a `MVT` (Machine Vector Type) object. The `getContainerForFixedLengthVector` function is used to get the container type for a fixed-length vector type. The `VT` variable is a `VectorType` object that represents the vector type of the operand." LLVM,RISCV,2778,"Based on the code snippet you provided, it appears that the next statement will be: `Result = DAG.getNode(, DL, ContainerVT, Op1, Op2, VL);` This statement is likely to be a call to the `getNode` method of the `DAG` object, which is used to create a new node in the data flow graph. The method takes several arguments, including the name of the node, the data layout, the container VT, and the operands `Op1` and `Op2`. The `V" LLVM,RISCV,2779,"The next statement after the `if` statement in the code snippet is the `return` statement. The `return` statement is executed if the `if` statement is true, which means that the `combineBinOpToReduce` function returned a non-null value. The `return` statement returns the value returned by the `combineBinOpToReduce` function." LLVM,RISCV,2780,"The next statement after the `if` statement in the code snippet is the `return` statement. The `return` statement is executed if the `if` statement is true, which means that the `combineBinOpToReduce` function returned a non-null value. The `return` statement returns the value returned by the `combineBinOpToReduce` function." LLVM,RISCV,2781,"Based on the code snippet you provided, it appears to be a part of a function that is generating machine code for a specific architecture. The code is using a library called ""DAG"" to generate the machine code. The code is checking if a certain condition is true, and if it is, it is generating a specific sequence of machine code instructions. The condition checks if the target architecture is 64-bit, has a specific extension (Zbs), and if a certain value is a constant. If the condition is true, the code generates a sequence of instructions that perform a bitwise AND operation on two values" LLVM,RISCV,2782,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `if ( SDValue V = combineBinOpToReduce ( N , DAG ) ) return V ;` This statement checks if the `combineBinOpToReduce` function can be applied to the current node `N` and the `DAG` object, and if so, returns the result of the reduction. If the reduction is not possible, the function falls through to the next statement, which is: `return combineSelectAndUseCommutative ( N , DAG , false ) ;`" LLVM,RISCV,2783,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific values of the variables and the implementation of the functions involved. However, based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the next statement will be: `return GORC;` This is because the first `if` statement checks if `GORC` is not null, and if it is not null, it returns `GORC`. If `GORC` is null, then the second `if` statement checks if `SHFL` is not null, and if it is not" LLVM,RISCV,2784,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific values of the variables and the behavior of the `getOperand` and `getConstant` methods. However, based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the next statement will be a return statement that returns a node with the opcode `~` and the operands `N0.getOperand()` and `DAG.getConstant(~, DL, )`." LLVM,RISCV,2785,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be: `if (XC && OldShiftOpcode == && XC->isOne()) return false;` This is because the `if` statement is checking whether `XC` is not null and whether `OldShiftOpcode` is equal to ``, and if both conditions are true, it returns `false`. If either condition is false, the code will continue to execute the next statement." LLVM,RISCV,2786,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return false;` This is because the `shouldRemoveExtendFromGSIndex` function is defined to always return `false`, regardless of the values of `IndexVT` and `DataVT`." LLVM,RISCV,2787,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return Subtarget . is64Bit ( ) && CI -> getType ( ) -> isIntegerTy ( ) ;` This statement is a return statement that returns a boolean value indicating whether the target is 64-bit and the type of the constant integer is an integer type with a specific number of bits (specified by the `` placeholder)." LLVM,RISCV,2788,"Based on the code snippet you provided, it appears that the next statement will be: `case : if ( ! Subtarget . hasVInstructionsF64 ( ) ) return false ; break ;` This is because the code is checking the type of the vector element type (EltVT) and returning false if the subtarget does not have instructions for that type. The previous cases checked for the types , , , and , and the next case is for the" LLVM,RISCV,2789,"The next statement after the given code snippet would be: * Fast = false; Explanation: The code snippet checks if the vector is scalable and if the alignment is greater than or equal to the store size of the vector element type. If these conditions are true, it sets the Fast flag to true and returns true. Otherwise, it sets the Fast flag to false and returns false. So, the next statement after the given code snippet would be setting the Fast flag to false, which is the default value for the flag." LLVM,RISCV,2790,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be a call to the `CC_` function, which is a function that takes several arguments and returns a boolean value. The function is called with the following arguments: * `MF`: The `MachineFunction` object that contains the current function being compiled. * `ISA_LIT`: The `ISA` object that represents the instruction set architecture (ISA) of the target machine. * `Subtarget`: The `Subtarget` object that represents the subtarget of the target machine. * `Data" LLVM,RISCV,2791,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `LLVM_DEBUG(dbgs() << << i << << EVT(ArgVT).getEVTString() << '\n');` This statement is a debug print that prints the value of `i` and the string representation of the `ArgVT` type. The `LLVM_DEBUG` macro is used to guard the debug print, so that it is only executed in debug builds." LLVM,RISCV,2792,"Based on the code snippet provided, it is difficult to predict the next statement with certainty. However, based on the context and the code structure, it is likely that the next statement will be a continuation of the `for` loop, with the variable `i` being incremented and the loop condition being checked again. The code snippet appears to be part of a function that is responsible for assigning masks to arguments in a function call. The function takes a `MachineFunction` object as an argument, and it appears to be using the `MachineFunction` object to retrieve information about the function's arguments and" LLVM,RISCV,2793,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `if (ValVT == && !UseGPRForF16_F32) Reg = State.AllocateReg(ArgFPR16s);` This statement checks if the value type `ValVT` is equal to `` and if the `UseGPRForF16_F32` flag is not set, and if so, allocates a register from the `ArgFPR16s` register class." LLVM,RISCV,2794,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `if (LocVT == || LocVT == ) {` This is because the previous `if` statement was not executed, and the `LocVT` variable is still equal to ``. Therefore, the next `if` statement that checks for the value of `LocVT` will be executed." LLVM,RISCV,2795,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific values of the variables and the behavior of the functions called. However, based on the code provided, it appears that the next statement will be: `NonConstantVal = TrueVal;` This is because the `else if` block is executed only if `isZeroOrAllOnes(FalseVal, AllOnes)` is true, and the `else` block is executed only if neither of the previous conditions are true. Since `FalseVal` is not equal to `AllOnes`," LLVM,RISCV,2796,"The next statement after the given code snippet is: `return Result;` Explanation: The given code snippet is a part of a function that is checking if the result of `combineSelectCCAndUse` is not null, and if it is not null, it returns the result. The `if` statement checks if the result of `combineSelectCCAndUse` is not null, and if it is not null, it returns the result. If the result is null, the function continues to the next statement, which is `return Result;`." LLVM,RISCV,2797,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `SDValue Result = combineSelectCCAndUse(N, N0, N1, DAG, AllOnes);` This statement is executed if the previous `if` statement is false, meaning that the `combineSelectCCAndUse` function was not able to combine the select instructions with the given operands. In this case, the function tries to combine the select instructions with the operands in a different order, by calling `combineSelectCCAndUse` with the operands `N1` and `N0` in the reverse order" LLVM,RISCV,2798,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `Known = KnownBits::urem(Known.trunc(), Known2.trunc());` This is because the code is currently inside the `case :` block, and the next statement after the `switch (IntNo) {` statement is the `Known = KnownBits::urem(Known.trunc(), Known2.trunc( : This is because the previous case statement ended with a colon (:), indicating the start of a new case. The next case statement is a string literal, which is indicated by the placeholder." LLVM,RISCV,2800,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `if (Subtarget.hasStdExtM() && VT.getSizeInBits() >= Subtarget.getXLen()) return false;` This statement checks if the subtarget has the `stdExtM` extension and if the size of the value type `VT` is greater than or equal to the subtarget's XLen. If both conditions are true, the function returns `false`." LLVM,RISCV,2801,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return false;` The `if` statement checks if the value of `Imm` plus or minus a certain value (represented by ``) is a power of 2. If it is, the function returns `true`. Otherwise, if the subtarget has the `stdExtM` extension and the value type's size in bits is greater than or equal to the subtarget's XLen, the function returns `false`. If none of these conditions are met, the function will continue to the next statement, which" LLVM,RISCV,2802,"The next statement after the `switch` statement in the code snippet you provided is the `return` statement. The `return` statement returns the value of the `Constraint` parameter, which is a `ConstraintType` object. The `switch` statement is used to determine the type of the `Constraint` object, and the `return` statement is used to return the appropriate `ConstraintType` object based on the type of the `Constraint` object. Here is the complete code snippet with the `switch` statement and the `return` statement: ``` switch (Constraint.getType()) {" LLVM,RISCV,2803,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet without knowing the specific values of the variables and the context in which the code is being executed. However, based on the syntax and the structure of the code, it appears to be a switch statement that is checking the value of a string literal and returning a tuple based on the value of the string. The switch statement is checking the value of the string literal `` and returning a tuple based on the value of the string. The tuple contains three elements: a string literal, an operand, and either a constant floating-point value or a" LLVM,RISCV,2804,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet without knowing the context in which it is being used. However, based on the syntax and structure of the code, it appears to be a switch statement that is handling different cases based on the value of a variable. The switch statement is checking the value of a variable (represented by the placeholder ) and executing different blocks of code depending on the value. Each case in the switch statement is labeled with a string literal (e.g. ""RET_FLAG"", ""URET_FLAG"", etc.) and the code inside" LLVM,RISCV,2805,"The next statement after the given code snippet is: `int C1Cost = getCost(C1Int, Ty.getSizeInBits(), Subtarget.is64Bit());`" LLVM,RISCV,2806,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `SDValue Result = convertFromScalableVector(VT, NewLoad, DAG, Subtarget);` This statement is calling the `convertFromScalableVector` function, which is a member function of the `SDValue` class. The function takes four arguments: `VT`, `NewLoad`, `DAG`, and `Subtarget`. The `VT` argument is the vector type of the load operation, and the `NewLoad` argument is the result of the `getMemIntrinsicNode` function, which is a load" LLVM,RISCV,2807,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `cast` function and the `getConstant` method. However, based on the context and the names of the variables, it is likely that the next statement will be something like: ``` SDValue VL = DAG.getConstant(VT.getVectorNumElements(), DL, Subtarget.getXLenVT()); ``` This statement is creating a new `SDValue` object called `VL` and initializing it with a constant value that is" LLVM,RISCV,2808,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `VT = ;` This statement assigns the value `` to the variable `VT`." LLVM,RISCV,2809,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `VaArgOffset = CCInfo.getNextStackOffset();`" LLVM,RISCV,2810,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet without knowing the context and the specific implementation of the functions being called. However, based on the code provided, it appears that the next statement will likely be a call to the `convertToScalableVector` function, as the code is setting up the arguments for this function. The `convertToScalableVector` function is not defined in the code snippet provided, so it is not possible to determine the exact behavior of this function. However, based on the name of the function and the arguments being passed to it, it appears that this function is used to" LLVM,RISCV,2811,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `VL = MVT(ContainerVT, IndexVT, DAG, Subtarget);` This statement creates a new `MVT` (Machine Vector Type) object with the container type `ContainerVT` and the index type `IndexVT`, and uses the `DAG` and `Subtarget` objects to create the machine code for the vector operation." LLVM,RISCV,2812,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet without knowing the specific values of the variables and the behavior of the functions being called. However, based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the next statement will be a call to the `translateSetCCForBranch` function, which is defined in the same file as the code snippet. The `translateSetCCForBranch` function takes several arguments, including a `SDLoc` object, a `SDValue` object, and a `SDValue` object. It appears that the `SDLoc` object is being used to specify the location" LLVM,RISCV,2813,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `StepVec = DAG.getNode(, DL, VT, Mask, VL);` This statement is assigning the result of the `DAG.getNode()` function to the `StepVec` variable. The function is called with several arguments, including a string literal (``), a data layout (`DL`), a value type (`VT`), a mask (`Mask`), and a vector length (`VL`). The return value of the function is a `SDValue` object, which is" LLVM,RISCV,2814,"Based on the code snippet you provided, it appears that the next statement will be: StepVec = DAG.getNode(, DL, VT, StepVec, StepVal); This is because the code is currently inside an if statement that checks if the value of StepValImm is not equal to . If this condition is true, then the code will execute the statement that assigns a new value to StepVec." LLVM,RISCV,2815,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `SDValue Gather = DAG . getNode ( GatherOpc , DL , ContainerVT , V1 , LHSIndices , TrueMask , VL ) ;` This statement is a call to the `getNode` method of the `DAG` object, which is used to create a new node in the DAG. The node is created with the opcode `GatherOpc`, the data layout `DL`, the vector type `ContainerVT`, and the operands `V1`, `LHSIndices" LLVM,RISCV,2816,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific values of the variables and the behavior of the functions called. However, based on the code provided, it appears that the next statement will be: Ops.push_back(DAG.getZExtOrTrunc(V, DL, XLenVT)); This is because the code checks whether the index of the current operation is equal to the EVLIdx, and if so, it pushes the value of the current operation onto the Ops vector. If the index" LLVM,RISCV,2817,"Based on the code snippet provided, it appears to be a part of a function that is performing some bitwise operations on a value. The function is checking if the value is a power of 2 and if it is, it is returning a value. If the value is not a power of 2, it is performing some additional operations on the value. It is difficult to predict the exact next statement of the code snippet without knowing the specific implementation of the function and the values of the variables used in the code. However, based on the code snippet provided, it is likely that the next statement will be related to the" LLVM,RISCV,2818,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `combineSelectCCAndUseCommutative` function and the values of the variables `N`, `DAG`, and `true`. However, based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the `combineSelectCCAndUseCommutative` function is being called with the arguments `N`, `DAG`, and `true`. The function is likely to return a new `SelectionDAG` object that combines the `SelectionDAG` object `DAG` with" LLVM,RISCV,2819,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be the return statement, which returns the result of the `combineSelectCCAndUseCommutative` function. The `combineSelectCCAndUseCommutative` function is called with three arguments: the `SDNode` `N`, the `SelectionDAG` `DAG`, and a boolean value indicating whether the operation is commutative. The function combines the `SDNode` `N` with the `SelectionDAG` `DAG` using the `AND` operation, and returns the result of the combination. Therefore" LLVM,RISCV,2820,"Based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the next statement of this code snippet would be: `if (auto GREV = combineORToGREV(SDValue(N, ), DAG, Subtarget)) return GREV;` This is because the code is checking if the `Subtarget` has the `StdExtZbp` extension, and if it does, it will try to combine the `OR` operation into a `GREV` operation using the `combineORToGREV` function. If that function returns a" LLVM,RISCV,2821,"The next statement after the given code snippet is: `return SDValue(N, );` This is because the `if` statements in the code snippet are checking for the presence of certain conditions, and if those conditions are not met, the code will return a value. If the conditions are met, the code will continue to execute and return a different value. In this case, the code is checking for the presence of a `GREV` or `GORC` value, and if those values are not present, it will return the `SDValue(N, <" LLVM,RISCV,2822,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet without knowing the specific implementation of the `performXORCombine` function and the `SDValue` and `TargetLowering` classes. However, based on the name of the function and the parameters it takes, it appears to be a function that performs an XOR operation on two values and returns the result as an `SDValue` object. The `TargetLowering` class is likely a class that provides a way to lower the target language to a lower-level representation, such as machine code. The `DAGCombinerInfo` class" LLVM,RISCV,2823,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be the return statement, which returns the result of the `combineSelectCCAndUseCommutative` function. The `combineSelectCCAndUseCommutative` function is called with the current node `N`, the DAG (Directed Acyclic Graph) of the target machine, and the `false` value. This function is used to combine the `SelectCC` and `UseCommutative` instructions in the DAG. The `SelectCC` instruction is used to select a value based on a condition code, while the" LLVM,RISCV,2824,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `LMul = divideCeil(VT.getSizeInBits(), MinVLen);` This statement calculates the least multiple of `MinVLen` that is greater than or equal to `VT.getSizeInBits()`, and assigns the result to `LMul`." LLVM,RISCV,2825,"Based on the code snippet you provided, it appears to be a part of a switch statement that is handling different cases for different string literals. The next statement after the code snippet you provided is: case : This is another case statement that is handling a different string literal. The code inside this case statement is checking if the value type of the operand is a string literal and if the operand is a constant SDNode. If these conditions are true, it is computing the number of sign bits in the operand and checking if it is greater than a certain value. If it" LLVM,RISCV,2826,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `if (Step != SeqStep) return None;`" LLVM,RISCV,2827,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific values of the variables and the behavior of the functions called. However, based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the next statement will be: `if ( SeqStep ) { int64_t Addend = SignExtend64 ( Val - ( Idx * ( uint64_t ) * SeqStep ) , EltSizeInBits ) ; if ( ! SeqAddend ) SeqAddend = Addend ; else if ( SeqAddend != Addend ) return None" LLVM,RISCV,2828,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be a call to the `translateSetCCForBranch` function, which is used to translate the setcc instruction for a branch. The function takes several arguments, including the data layout, the left and right operands, the condition code, and the DAG. The function returns a SDValue, which is used to represent the result of the setcc instruction. The next statement of the code snippet is likely to be: ``` SDValue Result = translateSetCCForBranch(DL, LHS, RHS, CCVal, DAG);" LLVM,RISCV,2829,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `SDValue Gather = DAG.getNode(GatherOpc, DL, ContainerVT, V1, DAG.getConstant(Lane, DL, XLenVT), TrueMask, VL);` This statement is creating a new `SDValue` called `Gather` using the `getNode` method of the `DAG` object. The `GatherOpc` variable is being used as the operation code for the gather operation, and the `ContainerVT` variable is being used as the" LLVM,RISCV,2830,"Based on the code snippet you provided, it appears to be checking whether a given vector type is valid for a particular target. The code is checking various properties of the vector type, such as its size in bits, its element type, and the minimum vector length for the target. Based on this information, it is difficult to predict the next statement of the code snippet with certainty. However, some possible next statements could be: * `case : if (VT.getVectorNumElements() > MinVLen) return false; MinVLen /= , DL , WideVT , Vec ) ;` This line of code creates a new vector node `Vec` using the `getNode` method of the `DAG` object, with the `WideVT` vector type and the original `Vec` vector as inputs. The `WideVT` vector type is a wider version of the original vector type, with the same number of elements but with each element having a larger size. This is done to allow" LLVM,RISCV,2836,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be: `VL = Op . getOperand ( ) ;` This is because the code is currently checking if the `IsVPTrunc` flag is set, and if it is not, it will retrieve the operand at index `` from the `Op` object and store it in the `VL` variable." LLVM,RISCV,2837,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be: `Result = DAG.getNode(ISD::VEC_TRUNC, DL, ContainerVT, Result, Mask, VL);` This statement is creating a new vector node using the `VEC_TRUNC` instruction, which truncates the elements of the vector `Result` to the type `ContainerVT` using the mask `Mask` and the vector length `VL`. The resulting vector is stored in the `Result` variable." LLVM,RISCV,2838,"The next statement of this code snippet is: SDValue Result = DAG.getNode(ISD::VEC_SPLAT, DL, ContainerVT, Src, Splat, ZeroSplat, VL);" LLVM,RISCV,2839,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific values of the variables and the behavior of the functions being called. However, based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the next statement will be a call to the `getNode` method of the `DAG` object, passing in the `ContainerVT` and `VL` variables as arguments. The `getNode` method is used to create a new node in the DAG, and the specific values of the arguments will determine the type and behavior of the node." LLVM,RISCV,2840,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `MVT VT = Op . getSimpleValueType ( ) ;` This line retrieves the value type of the operation `Op` and stores it in the variable `VT`." LLVM,RISCV,2841,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `MIB.addImm(VType::encodeVTYPE(Multiplier, ElementWidth, true, false));` This statement adds an immediate value to the machine instruction builder `MIB`, which is used to represent the `VTYPE` encoding for the vector operation. The `encodeVTYPE` function is called with the `Multiplier`, `ElementWidth`, and `true` as the last two arguments, which indicates that the operation is a vector operation and that the result should be stored in the destination" LLVM,RISCV,2842,"This code snippet is a part of a larger function that is responsible for handling the arguments of a function. The code is using a loop to iterate over the arguments, and for each argument, it is checking if it is a return value or an original argument, and then it is checking if the argument has a specific type. If the argument has the expected type, the code is printing a debug message and then it is using the `llvm_unreachable` function to indicate that the code should not be reached. The next statement of this code snippet is: `LLVM_DEBUG ( dbgs" LLVM,RISCV,2843,"Based on the code snippet provided, it is difficult to predict the next statement with certainty. However, based on the context and the structure of the code, it is likely that the next statement will be a continuation of the `for` loop. The code snippet is part of a function that appears to be generating code for a target machine, and the `for` loop is iterating over the arguments of a function call. The loop body is checking the properties of each argument and performing some operations based on those properties. Therefore, the next statement is likely to be another iteration of the `for`" LLVM,RISCV,2844,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `if (VT.isVector() && VT.getVectorNumElements() > 1) {`" LLVM,RISCV,2845,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific values of the variables and the behavior of the functions called. However, based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the next statement will be: `Outs[i].VT = VT;` This is because the loop is iterating over the elements of the `Outs` vector, and the current element being processed is `Outs[i]`. The statement `MVT VT = Outs[i].VT;` assigns the value of `Outs[i" LLVM,RISCV,2846,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `Reg = State.AllocateReg(ArgGPRs);`" LLVM,RISCV,2847,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `CombinedShAmt = ShAmt1 | ShAmt2;` This statement is assigning the result of the bitwise OR operation between `ShAmt1` and `ShAmt2` to the variable `CombinedShAmt`. The bitwise OR operation is denoted by the `|` operator." LLVM,RISCV,2848,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet without knowing the specific implementation of the `SDLoc` and `DAG` classes, as well as the values of the variables `Op`, `VT`, `LHS`, and `Subtarget`. However, based on the syntax and structure of the code, it appears that the next statement after the `return` statement is another `return` statement, which is likely to return a value of type `SDValue`." LLVM,RISCV,2849,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `Val = DAG.getNode(, DL, , Val);` This statement is assigning the result of the `getNode` method of the `DAG` object to the `Val` variable. The `getNode` method takes three arguments: the first is the string literal ``, the second is the `DL` object, and the third is the `Val` variable. The method returns a new node object that represents the string literal ``." LLVM,RISCV,2850,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `if (auto *ConstNode = dyn_cast(C.getNode())) {` This line is checking if the node `C` is a `ConstantSDNode` and if so, assigning it to the variable `ConstNode`." LLVM,RISCV,2851,"Based on the code snippet you provided, it appears to be a part of a function that is emitting instructions for a RISC-V processor. The function is handling a specific opcode and is using a switch statement to determine which instruction to emit. The next statement in the code snippet is: `case : assert ( ! Subtarget . is64Bit ( ) && ) ; return emitReadCycleWidePseudo ( MI , BB ) ;` This statement is handling the case where the opcode is `<" LLVM,RISCV,2852,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific values of the string literals and the return values of the functions. However, based on the pattern of the code, it is likely that the next statement will be another case statement with a string literal and a return statement with a string literal." LLVM,RISCV,2853,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet without knowing the context in which it is being used. However, based on the syntax and structure of the code, it appears to be a switch statement that is checking the value of a variable named `NODE_NAME` and executing different blocks of code based on the value. The `NODE_NAME_CASE` macro is being used to define the different cases of the switch statement. Each case is defined using the `NODE_NAME_CASE` macro, which takes a single argument that is the name of the case. The `break" LLVM,RISCV,2854,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet because the `break` statement is used to exit a loop or a switch statement, and it does not have any effect on the control flow of the program after the loop or switch statement has been exited. Therefore, the next statement after the `break` statement would be the statement that is executed after the loop or switch statement has been exited, which would depend on the specific context in which the `break` statement is used." LLVM,RISCV,2855,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `OutChains.push_back(Chain);` This line adds the `Chain` node to the `OutChains` vector, which is a vector of `SDValue` nodes that represent the output chain of the function. The `Chain` node is the last node in the chain of instructions that are generated by the function, and it represents the final output of the function. By adding it to the `OutChains` vector, we are indicating that this node is the output of the function." LLVM,RISCV,2856,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be a `case` statement, as it is part of a `switch` statement. The `default` case is already handled, so the next case is likely to be a specific integer value, such as `case 1:`, `case 2:`, etc. Without more context, it is difficult to determine the exact value of the next case." LLVM,RISCV,2857,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `case : return LowerINTRINSIC_WO_CHAIN ( Op , DAG ) ;` This is a case statement that checks if the operand is a specific string literal, and if so, it returns the result of the `LowerINTRINSIC_WO_CHAIN` function called with the operand and the `DAG` object." LLVM,RISCV,2858,"Based on the code snippet you provided, it appears to be a part of a function that is handling different types of operations in a specific order. The function is using a switch statement to handle different cases, and each case is handling a specific type of operation. The next statement in the code snippet is: case : return LowerINTRINSIC_WO_CHAIN ( Op , DAG ) ; This statement is handling the case where the operation is an intrinsic without a chain. It is calling the LowerINTRINSIC_WO_" LLVM,RISCV,2859,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be the assignment of the `Glue` variable, which is a `SDValue` object. The `Glue` variable is used to store the result of the `getCopyToReg` method, which is called on the `DAG` object. The `getCopyToReg` method is used to copy a value from a register to another register, and it returns a `SDValue` object that represents the result of the copy operation. The `Glue` variable is assigned the value of the `Chain` variable, which is a" LLVM,RISCV,2860,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be: `RetOps[0] = Chain;` This is because the code is currently iterating over the `RetOps` vector, and the next element to be processed is the one at index 0. The `RetOps` vector is a vector of `SDValue` objects, and `Chain` is an `SDValue` object that is being used to store the result of the `getCopyToReg` operation. It's worth noting that the code snippet you provided is quite complex and involves a lot" LLVM,RISCV,2861,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `SDValue Result = DAG.getNode(, DL, Op.getValueType(), Ops);` This statement creates a new SDValue node with the given name, data layout, and operands, and returns it as the result of the function. The operands are the same as the ones used in the previous line of code, with the addition of the `TrueV` and `FalseV` values." LLVM,RISCV,2862,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `if (Src.getOpcode() == && isa(Src.getOperand())) {` This is a conditional statement that checks if the `Src` operand is a constant and has a specific opcode. If the condition is true, the code inside the `if` block will be executed." LLVM,RISCV,2863,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `case : case : case : case : case : { SDValue LHS = N -> getOperand ( ) ; SDValue RHS = N -> getOperand ( ) ; APInt LHSMask = APInt :: getLowBitsSet ( LHS . getValueSizeInBits ( ) , ) ;" LLVM,RISCV,2864,"Based on the code snippet provided, it appears to be a loop that iterates over the elements of a vector called `Args`. The loop starts at an index specified by `` and increments by 1 until it reaches the end of the vector. Inside the loop, the code checks if the current element is a scalable vector and if its element type is a simple type (i.e., not a vector or a pointer). If the condition is true, the loop sets the `FirstMaskArgument` variable to the current index and breaks out of the loop. Therefore," LLVM,RISCV,2865,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `FirstMaskArgument = I;`" LLVM,RISCV,2866,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet without knowing the specific implementation of the `MachineFunction`, `DAG`, `MachineRegisterInfo`, `EVT`, `SDValue`, and `TargetRegisterClass` classes. However, based on the names of the variables and methods, it appears that the code is working with a machine function and register information, and is trying to determine the register class for a given value type. Here are a few possibilities for the next statement: * `Val = MF.getReg(LocVT.getSimpleVT());` - This statement would" LLVM,RISCV,2867,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `getOperand` and `getScalarSizeInBits` methods, as well as the values of the constants and variables used in the code. However, based on the names of the methods and variables, it appears that the code is working with a vector of values, and is trying to narrow the vector to a smaller size by dividing the scalar size in bits by a constant. It is also creating a mask and a vector of values, and is using the `SDLoc`" LLVM,RISCV,2868,"The next statement of this code snippet is: WOpc = Op1.getOpcode();" LLVM,RISCV,2869,"Based on the code snippet you provided, it appears that the next statement will be: `unsigned ShAmt2 = Src.getConstantOperandVal();` This is because the code is checking the operands of the `Src` value to see if they are both constant, and if so, it is extracting the constant value of the second operand. The `ShAmt2` variable is likely being used to store the result of this extraction." LLVM,RISCV,2870,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `CombinedShAmt = ShAmt1 + ShAmt2;` This is because the code is checking the operands of the `SDNode` and combining their shift amounts. The `ShAmt1` and `ShAmt2` variables are assigned the shift amounts of the two operands, and then the `CombinedShAmt` variable is assigned the sum of these two shift amounts." LLVM,RISCV,2871,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `Op0 = Op0 . getOperand ( ) ;` This statement assigns the operand of `Op0` with the value of `` to the variable `Op0`." LLVM,RISCV,2872,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `if ( BitWidth < || ShAmt1 != ( BitWidth / ) || ShAmt2 != ( BitWidth - ) ) return SDValue ( ) ;` This statement checks if the bit width of the operands is less than a certain value, or if the shift amounts are not equal to the expected values. If any of these conditions are true, the function returns an empty `SDValue`." LLVM,RISCV,2873,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `uint64_t Mask = GREVMasks[Stage];` This line declares a variable `Mask` of type `uint64_t` and initializes it with the value of the `GREVMasks` array at index `Stage`." LLVM,RISCV,2874,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `Res = ( ( x & Mask ) << Shift ) | ( ( x >> Shift ) & Mask ) ;` This statement is assigning the result of the bitwise AND and shift operations to the `Res` variable. The `Mask` variable is being used to select the bits that should be shifted, and the `Shift` variable is being used to determine the amount of shift. The `x` variable is being used as the input value for the shift operation." LLVM,RISCV,2875,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be a `case` statement, as the previous statement is a `switch` statement. The `case` statement is used to match a specific value of the `IntNo` variable and execute the corresponding code block." LLVM,RISCV,2876,"Based on the code snippet you provided, it appears to be part of a function that is handling the generation of machine code for a target machine. The function is using a switch statement to determine the code model of the target machine and then generating code based on that model. The next statement in the code snippet is: `SDValue AddrHi = getTargetNode(N, DL, Ty, DAG, );` This line is declaring a variable `AddrHi` of type `SDValue` and initializing it with the result of the `getTargetNode" LLVM,RISCV,2877,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be the return statement, which returns a pair of values: `Mask` and `VL`. The `Mask` value is a node in the directed acyclic graph (DAG) representing a vector of masks, and the `VL` value is a scalar value representing the length of the vector. The return statement is likely to be the last statement in the function, as it is the final result of the function." LLVM,RISCV,2878,"Based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the next statement will be: SDValue MNLo = SDValue ( DAG . getMachineNode ( , DL , Ty , AddrLo ) , ) ; This is because the code is using a pattern of creating an SDValue for a machine node, which is a node in the intermediate representation of the code that represents a machine instruction. The machine node is created using the DAG.getMachineNode() method, which takes several parameters, including the name of the instruction, the data" LLVM,RISCV,2879,"Based on the code snippet you provided, it appears to be a switch statement that is handling different cases for a machine memory operand. The next statement in the code snippet is: case : This case is handling the situation where the operand is a store instruction. The code is setting the opcode for the store instruction, setting the pointer value to the argument operand, and setting the alignment and size of the memory location. It is also setting the flags for the memory operand to indicate that it is a load and store operation." LLVM,RISCV,2880,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet without knowing the specific implementation of the `TargetLowering` class and the `hasBitTest` method. However, based on the name of the method and the parameters, it is likely that the next statement will be a check to determine if the bitwise AND operation between `X` and `Y` is non-zero. In other words, the next statement is likely to be something like: ``` if (X & Y != 0) { // do something } ``` This is just a guess, and the actual" LLVM,RISCV,2881,"The next statement after the code snippet you provided is likely to be a continuation of the `if` statement that the code snippet is a part of. In this case, the next statement is likely to be an `else` statement, which will be executed if the condition in the `if` statement is not met. Here is an example of what the complete code snippet might look like: ``` if (C && C->getAPIntValue().ule()) { // do something } else { // do something else } ```" LLVM,RISCV,2882,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `int MaskSrc = M < Size ? : ;` This line assigns a value to the variable `MaskSrc` based on the comparison of `M` and `Size`. If `M` is less than `Size`, the value assigned to `MaskSrc` is ``, otherwise it is ``." LLVM,RISCV,2883,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `assert ( Rotation != && ) ;` This is an assertion statement that checks whether the `Rotation` variable is not equal to a specific value (represented by ``) and whether a string literal (represented by ``) is not empty. If either of these conditions is not met, the assertion will fail and an error message will be displayed." LLVM,RISCV,2884,"The next statement after the `if` statement is `return true;`. The `if` statement checks if `C1` is a signed integer with a specific number of bits (represented by ``) and if `C1 * C2` is also a signed integer with the same number of bits. If both conditions are true, the function returns `false`. Otherwise, it returns `true`. Therefore, the next statement after the `if` statement is `return true;`, which means that the function will return `true` if the conditions in the `if" LLVM,RISCV,2885,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet without knowing the specific implementation of the `TargetLowering` class and the `isShuffleMaskLegal` method. However, based on the name of the method and the parameters it takes, it appears to be checking whether a shuffle mask is legal for a given array of integers and a vector type. Without more information, it is not possible to determine the exact next statement of the code snippet. However, some possible next statements could include: * Checking the length of the array to ensure it is a valid shuffle mask." LLVM,RISCV,2886,"The next statement after the code snippet you provided is: `return ( isElementRotate ( LoSrc , HiSrc , M ) > ) || isInterleaveShuffle ( M , SVT , SwapSources , Subtarget ) ;` This statement is a return statement that returns a boolean value indicating whether the current element is a rotate or an interleave shuffle. The return value is determined by the result of the `isElementRotate` function, which checks if the current element is a rotate, and the result of the `isInter" LLVM,RISCV,2887,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `SDValue SplatZero = DAG.getNode(, DL, ContainerVT, DAG.getUNDEF(ContainerVT), DAG.getConstant(, DL, Subtarget.getXLenVT()));` This statement creates a new SDValue called `SplatZero` using the `getNode` method of the `DAG` object. The `getNode` method takes several arguments: * ``: This" LLVM,RISCV,2888,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific values of the variables and the implementation of the `convertToScalableVector` and `getDefaultVLOps` functions. However, based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the next statement will be a call to the `getNode` method of the `DAG` object, passing in the `ContainerVT` object, the `DL` object, the `ContainerVT` object again, and the result of the `getUNDEF` method of the `DAG` object, which" LLVM,RISCV,2889,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be the creation of a new `SDValue` object, which is a value in the intermediate representation of the code that is being generated by the compiler. The `SDValue` object will be created by calling the `DAG.getConstant()` method, which returns a constant value in the intermediate representation. The `DAG.getConstant()` method takes three arguments: the first is the value of the constant, the second is the data layout of the target machine, and the third is the type of the constant. In this case, the value of the" LLVM,RISCV,2890,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific values of the variables and the behavior of the functions being called. However, based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the next statement will be: SDValue NewValue = convertToScalableVector(ContainerVT, StoreVal, DAG, Subtarget); This is because the code snippet is currently assigning the result of the getConstant() function to the NewValue variable, and the getConstant() function is called with the ContainerVT, StoreVal, DAG, and" LLVM,RISCV,2891,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `SDValue Reduction = DAG.getNode(RVVOpcode, DL, M1VT, DAG.getUNDEF(M1VT), VectorVal, ScalarSplat, Mask, VL);` This statement creates a new `SDValue` object called `Reduction` and initializes it with the result of a call to `DAG.getNode()`. The `DAG.getNode()` method is used to create a new node in the data-flow graph, and the" LLVM,RISCV,2892,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific values of the variables and the behavior of the functions being called. However, based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the next statement will be: `MVT M1VT = getLMUL1VT(VectorVal.getSimpleValueType());` This statement is assigning the result of the `getLMUL1VT` function, which takes a `MVT` as an argument, to the `M1VT` variable. The `getLMUL" LLVM,RISCV,2893,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it appears to be a fragment of a larger program and the context is not provided. However, based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the next statement could be a call to the `DAG.getNode()` method, which is used to create a new node in the directed acyclic graph (DAG) representing the program. The `DAG.getNode()` method takes several arguments, including the node type, the location, the value type, and the operands. The node type is specified using a string" LLVM,RISCV,2894,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific values of the variables and the behavior of the functions being called. However, based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the next statement will be a call to the `convertFromAPInt` method of the `APFloat` class, passing in the `APInt` object returned by the `getOneBitSet` method, the `false` value, and the `APFloat::rmNearestTiesToEven` value. Here is a breakdown of the code snippet:" LLVM,RISCV,2895,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it appears to be part of a larger function and the context is not provided. However, based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the next statement may be related to the creation of a new node in the Directed Acyclic Graph (DAG) that is being constructed. The code snippet defines a number of variables, including `Src`, `Truncated`, `SetccVT`, and `MaxValNode`. It also defines a number of functions, including `getFreeze()`, `changeVectorElementType" LLVM,RISCV,2896,"This code snippet appears to be part of a function that is performing a vector insert operation. It is difficult to determine the exact behavior of the code without more context, but based on the variable names and the operations being performed, it appears to be doing the following: 1. It is checking if the insert operation is legal by checking if the vector type is floating point and if the index is a null constant. 2. If the insert operation is legal, it is creating a new vector by inserting the value into the vector at the specified index. 3. If the insert operation is not legal, it is creating a" LLVM,RISCV,2897,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `SDValue One = DAG.getConstant(1, DL, XLenVT);` This statement defines a new `SDValue` object named `One` and initializes it with the value `1`, which is a constant with type `XLenVT`. The `getConstant` method of the `DAG` object is used to create this constant. The `DL` parameter is the data layout object, which is used to determine the size and alignment of the constant. The `XLenVT` parameter is the vector" LLVM,RISCV,2898,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `if ( VT . isFloatingPoint ( ) ) {` This is because the `HasPassthru` variable is set to `true` if `Passthru` is not undefined and `Passthru` is not undefined, and the `VT` variable is set to the `XLenVT` variable if `VT` is a floating-point type. Therefore, the next statement will be the `if` statement that checks if `VT` is a floating-point type." LLVM,RISCV,2899,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific values of the operands and the target architecture. However, based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the next statement will be a call to the `getNode` method of the `DAG` object, passing in the `Shamt` and `MinusXLen` values as arguments. The `getNode` method is used to create a new node in the DAG, and the specific node that will be created depends on the value of the `STR_LIT` argument, which is not" LLVM,RISCV,2900,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific values of the variables and the behavior of the `getNode` and `getConstant` methods. However, based on the code snippet, it appears that the next statement will be a call to `getNode` with the `ShiftRightOp` operation and the `Hi` and `Shamt` values as arguments. This will likely return a node representing the result of shifting the `Hi` value to the right by the amount specified in `Shamt`." LLVM,RISCV,2901,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `SDValue ShiftRightOp = DAG.getNode(IsSRA ? ISD::SRA : ISD::SRL, DL, VT, Lo, Shamt);` This statement creates a new SDValue object `ShiftRightOp` that represents the result of a shift right operation on the `Lo` operand with the `Shamt` operand as the shift amount. The type of the shift operation is determined by the `IsSRA` parameter, which is used to select either the `ISD::SRA`" LLVM,RISCV,2902,"The next statement of the code snippet is: `int32_t LoC = cast < ConstantSDNode > ( Lo ) -> getSExtValue ( ) ;` This statement casts the `Lo` operand to a `ConstantSDNode` and then extracts its signed extended value. The `getSExtValue()` method is used to get the signed extended value of the constant, which is then stored in the `LoC` variable." LLVM,RISCV,2903,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return DAG.getNode(, DL, VecVT, DAG.getUNDEF(VecVT), Lo, DAG.getRegister(, ));` This statement is reached if the `if` condition is true, which means that `Lo` and `Hi` are both constant nodes, and the value of `Lo` shifted right by `` is equal to the value of `Hi`. In this case, the function" LLVM,RISCV,2904,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet without knowing the context and the specific implementation of the `isPowerOf2_64` function and the `lowerScalarSplat` function. However, based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the next statement will be: `StepVec = DAG . getNode ( , DL , VT , StepVec , StepVal ) ;` This statement is likely to be executed regardless of whether `isPowerOf2_64` returns true or false, as it is not within the" LLVM,RISCV,2905,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific inputs and the behavior of the `lowerScalarSplat` function. However, based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the next statement will be: `StepVec = DAG.getNode(, DL, VT, StepVec, StepVal);` This statement is likely to be executed if the `if` condition is not met, and it appears to be a continuation of the previous statement. The `getNode` method is called on" LLVM,RISCV,2906,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be: `SDValue Vec = convertToScalableVector(ContainerVT, Vec, DAG, Subtarget);` This is because the previous statement, `MVT ContainerVT = VecVT;`, sets the `ContainerVT` variable to the same value as `VecVT`, and the next statement is likely to be a call to the `convertToScalableVector` function, which takes a `ContainerVT` as its first argument." LLVM,RISCV,2907,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `getDefaultVLOps` function and the `Subtarget` object. However, based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the next statement will be a call to the `getDefaultVLOps` function, which will return a tuple containing a mask and a vector length. The mask and vector length will then be used to create a new vector with the same length as the input vector, but with all elements set to zero or true, depending on the value of `ExtTrueVal`." LLVM,RISCV,2908,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific values of the variables and the behavior of the functions being called. However, based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the next statement will be a call to the `getNode` method of the `DAG` object, passing in the `ContainerVT` variable as the first argument, the `DL` variable as the second argument, and the `SplatZero` and `VL` variables as the third and fourth arguments, respectively. The `getNode` method is used to" LLVM,RISCV,2909,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be: `SDValue Mask = DAG.getNode(ISD::SETCC, DL, MaskVT, Trunc, SplatZero, getCondCodeForSetCC(CondCode::SETLT));` This statement creates a new SDValue `Mask` by calling the `getNode` method of the `DAG` object with the `ISD::SETCC` opcode, the `MaskVT` type, the `Trunc` and `SplatZero` operands, and the `" LLVM,RISCV,2910,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `SDValue Trunc = DAG.getNode(, DL, ContainerVT, Src, SplatOne, Mask, VL);` This line of code creates a new node in the DAG (Directed Acyclic Graph) representing the result of truncating the input vector `Src` to the element type of the container vector `ContainerVT`. The `getNode` method is called with the following arguments: * ``: The name of the instruction to" LLVM,RISCV,2911,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it appears to be part of a larger function and the context is not provided. However, based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the next statement may be related to the creation of a vector mask or a vector of values. The code snippet defines several variables, including `IntVT`, `XLenVT`, `Mask`, `VL`, `VLMax`, `VLMinus1`, and `SplatVL`. These variables are likely to be used in the creation of a vector mask or" Compiler Type,Target,Idx,Des LLVM,RISCV,2912,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet without knowing the context and the values of the variables used in the code. However, based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the next statement could be a call to the `getNode` method of the `DAG` object, passing in various parameters such as the `VecVT` object, the `DL` object, and the `VLMinus1` object. The `getNode` method is used to create a new node in the DAG, and the parameters passed to it determine the type of node that is created." LLVM,RISCV,2913,"The next statement of this code snippet is: UpOffset = DAG.getConstant(ImmValue, DL, XLenVT);" LLVM,RISCV,2914,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `MVT InterimFVT = DstVT;` This statement is assigning the value of `DstVT` to the variable `InterimFVT`." LLVM,RISCV,2915,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `SDValue Reduction = DAG . getNode ( RVVOpcode , DL , M1VT , StartSplat , Vec , StartSplat , Mask , VL ) ;` This line of code creates a new node in the DAG (Directed Acyclic Graph) representing the reduction operation, using the `RVVOpcode` opcode, the `DL` location, the `M1VT` vector element type, the `StartSplat` vector, the `Vec`" LLVM,RISCV,2916,"The next statement of this code snippet is: ``` ContainerVT = VT . getFixedLengthVectorElementType ( ) ; ``` This statement assigns the element type of the fixed-length vector `VT` to the variable `ContainerVT`." LLVM,RISCV,2917,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be a call to the `getNode` method of the `DAG` object, passing in the `Vec`, `Idx`, `Mask`, and `VL` values as arguments. The `getNode` method is used to create a new node in the DAG, and the arguments passed to it determine the type and properties of the node. In this case, the `getNode` method is being called with the `Vec`, `Idx`, `Mask`, and `VL` values as arguments, which suggests that the next statement of the" LLVM,RISCV,2918,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `SDValue Result = DAG.getNode(ISD::BITREVERSE, SDLoc(N), Src);` This statement is creating a new SDValue called `Result` by calling the `getNode` method of the `DAG` object with the `ISD::BITREVERSE` opcode and the `SDLoc` of the `N` node as arguments. The `Src` SDValue is also passed as an argument to the `getNode` method." LLVM,RISCV,2919,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `SDValue Src = N->getOperand();`." LLVM,RISCV,2920,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `if (Subtarget.hasStdExtZbb() && Subtarget.is64Bit() && Src.getOpcode() == && Src.hasOneUse() && VT == && cast(N->getOperand())->getVT() == && DAG.ComputeNumSignBits(Src.getOperand()) > `, the" LLVM,RISCV,2922,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be: `Instruction * Insn = cast < Instruction > ( U . getUser ( ) ) ;` This line of code is casting the user of the use `U` to an `Instruction` pointer. The `getUser()` method returns the user of the use, which in this case is an instruction that uses the value of the use. The `cast` function is used to cast the user to an `Instruction` pointer, which allows the code to access the instruction's properties and methods." LLVM,RISCV,2923,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet without knowing the specific values of the variables and the implementation of the `DAG` class. However, based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the next statement will be a call to the `DAG.getNode()` method, passing in the `VT` variable as the first argument, and the `Lo` and `Hi` variables as the second and third arguments, respectively. The `DAG.getNode()` method appears to be used to create a new node in the directed acyclic graph (DAG) that represents the" LLVM,RISCV,2924,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be a comparison of the values of `LoC` and `HiC`, possibly using a relational operator such as `==`, `!=`, `<`, `>`, `<=`, or `>=` to compare the two values. Without knowing the specific context of the code, it is difficult to provide a more specific prediction. However, based on the names of the variables and the use of the `getSExtValue()` method, it is likely that the code is working with signed integers and is comparing the values of two constants." LLVM,RISCV,2925,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific values of the variables and the implementation of the functions involved. However, based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the next statement will be a call to the `splatPartsI64WithVL` function, which takes several arguments related to the scalar and vector values being processed. The function will likely perform some operation on these values and return a result." LLVM,RISCV,2926,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `Reg = State.AllocateReg(ArgFPR16s, ArgFPR64s);`" LLVM,RISCV,2927,"The next statement of this code snippet is: Val = DAG.getNode(, DL, VA.getValVT(), Val); This is the last statement in the code snippet, so it will be executed after the if-else statements." LLVM,RISCV,2928,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it appears to be a fragment of a larger program and the context is not provided. However, based on the syntax and the structure of the code, it appears that the next statement will be a call to the `getNode` method of the `DAG` object, passing in the `DL` object, a string literal, and the `Val` variable as arguments. The `getNode` method is likely to return a node object, which will be assigned to the `Val` variable." LLVM,RISCV,2929,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `case CCValAssign::Full: break;` This is because the `switch` statement is checking the value of `VA.getLocInfo()`, and the next case after `default` is `CCValAssign::Full`." LLVM,RISCV,2930,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `Val = DAG.getNode(, DL, , Val);`" LLVM,RISCV,2931,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `MachineFunctionInfo` class and the `getMoveF64FrameIndex` method. However, based on the context and the names of the variables, it is likely that the next statement will be related to the `DstReg`, `LoReg`, and `HiReg` registers, and will involve moving data between them and the frame index. One possible next statement could be: `MI . getOperand ( ) . setReg ( D" LLVM,RISCV,2932,"It's difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific inputs and context in which the code is being executed. However, based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the next statement will be a call to the `BuildMI` function, which is used to build a machine instruction. The `BuildMI` function takes several arguments, including a pointer to a basic block, a machine instruction, a data layout, and a target information object. The function returns a pointer to a machine instruction. The next statement is likely to be a call to the `Build" LLVM,RISCV,2933,"The next statement in the code snippet is: `case :`" LLVM,RISCV,2934,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be: `MachineInstr * LoInstr = MF.createPseudoReg(LoReg, MI.getType());` This is because the code is creating a new machine instruction, `LoInstr`, using the `createPseudoReg` method of the `MachineFunction` class, and passing in the `LoReg` register and the type of the `MI` instruction. The `createPseudoReg` method creates a new machine instruction that is a pseudo-register, which is a register that is not directly" LLVM,RISCV,2935,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific values of the string literals and the context in which the code is being executed. However, based on the syntax and structure of the code, it appears to be a switch statement that is returning a string literal based on the value of a string variable. The code snippet is using a series of case statements to match the value of the string variable against a series of string literals. If the value of the string variable matches one of the string literals, the corresponding string literal will be returned. If the value" LLVM,RISCV,2936,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `isNullConstant` function and the `Op` object. However, based on the code provided, it appears that the next statement will be: ``` if (isNullConstant(Idx)) return Op; SDValue Vec = Op.getOperand(); EVT EltVT = Op.getValueType(); EVT VecVT = Vec.getValueType(); ``` This is because the `isNullConstant" LLVM,RISCV,2937,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be: `SDValue Result = DAG.getNode(, DL, EltVT, Slidedown);` This is because the `lowerEXTRACT_VECTOR_ELT` function is expected to return a value of the same type as the input vector, but with the element at the specified index extracted. The `Slidedown` variable is a vector with the same type as the input vector, but with the element at the specified index moved to the first position. The `Result` variable is" LLVM,RISCV,2938,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `Operands.push_back(Promote);`" LLVM,RISCV,2939,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet as it appears to be a fragment of a larger codebase and there is not enough context to determine the purpose of the code or the values of the variables. Additionally, the code appears to be using a custom syntax and may be part of a larger program or framework. Without more information, it is not possible to accurately predict the next statement of this code snippet." LLVM,RISCV,2940,"Based on the code snippet you provided, it appears to be a part of a switch statement that is handling different types of operations based on the value of a string literal. The next statement is likely to be another case statement or the default statement. Without more context, it is difficult to predict the exact next statement, but based on the pattern of the code, it is likely to be another case statement that handles a different type of operation." LLVM,RISCV,2941,"Based on the code snippet provided, it appears to be a switch statement that is handling different cases for lowering operations in a compiler. The next statement is likely to be another case statement, as the code snippet ends with a colon (:) and a space, indicating that it is expecting another case to be defined. Therefore, the next statement of this code snippet is likely to be: case :" LLVM,RISCV,2942,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `case :` This is a `case` statement in a `switch` block, and it is checking the value of a string literal. The exact value of the string literal is not specified in the code snippet, but it is likely to be a constant string that is used as a key or identifier in the code. The `case` statement is checking whether the value of the string literal is equal to a specific value, and if it is, it is executing a block of code." LLVM,RISCV,2943,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `ExtType = MVT::i32;`" LLVM,RISCV,2944,"Based on the code snippet provided, it is difficult to predict the next statement with certainty. However, based on the context and the structure of the code, it is likely that the next statement will be a case statement or a default statement. The code snippet appears to be a switch statement that is checking the value of `VA.getLocInfo()` and then executing different code based on the value. The switch statement has three case statements: `Full`, `Indirect`, and `BCvt`. The default statement is also present, which is executed if none of the case statements match. It is also possible" LLVM,RISCV,2945,"The next statement of the code snippet is: State.addLoc(CCValAssign::getReg(ValNo2, ValVT2, Reg, LocVT2, CCValAssign::Full));" LLVM,RISCV,2946,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet without knowing the specific values of the variables and the behavior of the functions being called. However, based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the next statement will be: `if (LocVT == || LocVT == ) {` This is because the previous `if` statements have all been evaluated and found to be false, so the next `if` statement that will be evaluated is the one that checks if `LocVT` is equal to ``" LLVM,RISCV,2947,"Based on the code snippet you provided, it appears that the next statement after the `case : return emitSelectPseudo ( MI , BB ) ;` statement would be `case : return emitBuildPairF64Pseudo ( MI , BB ) ;`. The `case :` statement is used to match a specific string literal, and the `return` statement is used to return a value from the function. In this case, the `emitSelectPseudo` function is called with the `MI" LLVM,RISCV,2948,"Based on the code snippet you provided, it appears to be a part of a function that generates assembly code for a specific instruction. The function appears to be handling a variety of different instructions, each with its own specific logic. The next statement in the code snippet is: `return emitSelectPseudo ( MI , BB ) ;` This statement is likely to be executed if the current instruction is a ""select"" instruction, which is a type of instruction that selects a value from a set of values based on a condition. The `emitSelectPseudo` function is likely to be responsible" LLVM,RISCV,2949,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be a call to the `CreateCall` method of the `Builder` object, passing in the `MaskedCmpXchg` function and a list of arguments to be passed to the function. The `MaskedCmpXchg` function is a function that takes five arguments: `AlignedAddr`, `CmpVal`, `NewVal`, `Mask`, and `Ordering`. The `CreateCall` method will create a new call instruction that invokes the `MaskedCmpXchg` function with the specified arguments." LLVM,RISCV,2950,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `Value * MaskedCmpXchg = Builder.CreateCall(MaskedCmpXchg, {AlignedAddr, CmpVal, NewVal, Mask, Ordering});` This statement creates a call to the `MaskedCmpXchg` function, passing in the `AlignedAddr`, `CmpVal`, `NewVal`, `Mask`, and `Ordering` values as arguments. The `CreateCall` method is used to create the call, and the `MaskedCmp" LLVM,RISCV,2951,"The next statement of the code snippet is: `Incr = Builder.CreateSExt(Incr, Builder.getInt64Ty());` This statement is creating a sign-extended version of the `Incr` value, which is a 64-bit integer. The `CreateSExt` method is used to create a sign-extended value, and it takes two arguments: the value to be sign-extended, and the type of the result. In this case, the `Incr` value is being sign-extended to a 64-" LLVM,RISCV,2952,"The next statement of this code snippet is: Result = Builder . CreateCall ( LrwOpScwLoop , { AlignedAddr , Incr , Mask , SextShamt , Ordering } ) ;" LLVM,RISCV,2953,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific inputs and the behavior of the functions called within the code. However, based on the code provided, it appears that the next statement will be the first `if` statement, which checks if the target ABI is less than a certain value. If the target ABI is less than this value, the code will execute the block of code within the `if` statement, which includes a call to the `getTargetNode` function and a check for whether the `IsLocal` variable is true. If the `Is" LLVM,RISCV,2954,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `Args.push_back(Load);` This is because the code is creating a vector of arguments (`Args`) and adding the `Load` value to it. The `push_back` method is used to add an element to the end of a vector." LLVM,RISCV,2955,"The next statement of this code snippet is: return ( Subtarget . getTargetABI ( ) ) ? : ; This statement is a ternary operator, which is a shorthand for an if-else statement. The condition is ( Subtarget . getTargetABI ( ) ), and the two possible outcomes are and . The statement will return the first outcome if the condition is true, and the second outcome if the" LLVM,RISCV,2956,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be a return statement, as the function `getExceptionPointerRegister` is expected to return a value of type `Register`. The return statement is likely to be of the form `return `, where `` is an expression that evaluates to a value of type `Register`. The expression is likely to involve the use of the `Subtarget` object, which is a member of the `TargetLowering` class, and the `getTargetABI` method, which is a member of the `TargetABI` class. Without" LLVM,RISCV,2957,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be a return statement, as the function `getExceptionPointerRegister` is expected to return a value of type `Register`. The return statement is likely to be of the form `return `, where `` is an expression that evaluates to a value of type `Register`. The expression is likely to involve the use of the `Subtarget` object, which is a member of the `TargetLowering` class, and the `getTargetABI` method, which is a member of the `TargetABI` class. Without" LLVM,RISCV,2958,"Based on the code snippet provided, it appears to be a part of a function that is trying to determine the alignment of a memory operation. The function is checking if the size of the operation is greater than or equal to the size of the capabilities, and if the operation is aligned to the capabilities. The next statement of the code snippet would be: `if (Op.isAligned(CapAlign)) {` This statement checks if the operation is aligned to the capabilities. If it is, the function returns the `CapType`. If it is not, the function checks if the operation is" LLVM,RISCV,2959,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `EVT ResultType = getSetCCResultType(DL, Context, VT);` This statement calls the `getSetCCResultType` function with the `DL` and `Context` arguments, and the `VT` argument, and assigns the result to the `ResultType` variable. The `getSetCCResultType` function is a member function of the `TargetLowering` class, and it is used to get the result type of a setcc instruction." LLVM,RISCV,2960,"It's difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific inputs and the behavior of the `DAG` object. However, based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the next statement will be: `SDValue MNAdd = SDValue(DAG.getMachineNode(, DL, Ty, MNHi, TPReg, AddrAdd), );` This statement creates a new `SDValue` object named `MNAdd` by calling the `getMachineNode" LLVM,RISCV,2961,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be: `return TailPaddingAmount :: None;` This is because the `if` statement checks if the `Subtarget` is not a valid target ABI, and if it is not, the function returns `TailPaddingAmount :: None`. If the `if` statement is not true, then the function will continue to execute the next statement, which is the `return` statement." LLVM,RISCV,2962,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the code depends on the specific values of the variables and the input data. However, based on the syntax and the context of the code, it appears that the code is checking the value of a string variable against a series of string literals, and returning `false` if the value of the string variable matches any of the literals. Therefore, the next statement of this code snippet is likely to be the next case statement, which checks the value of the string variable against another string literal." LLVM,RISCV,2963,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `BlockAddress * BA = N->getBlockAddress();`" LLVM,RISCV,2964,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return getAddr(N, Ty, DAG, true, true);` This statement is calling the `getAddr` function with the following arguments: * `N`: a `BlockAddressSDNode` object representing the block address to be lowered. * `Ty`: the value type of the block address. * `DAG`: the selection DAG. * `true`: a flag indicating that the block address should be lowered to a machine address. * `true`: a flag indicating that the block address should" LLVM,RISCV,2965,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return DAG . getNode ( , DL , Op . getValueType ( ) , Op . getOperand ( ) , LHS , RHS , TargetCC , Op . getOperand ( ) ) ;` This statement returns a node from the DAG (Directed Acyclic Graph) representing the result of the operation. The node is created using the `getNode` method of the DAG, and it has the following properties:" LLVM,RISCV,2966,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the program depends on the specific values of the variables and the implementation of the `ConstantPoolSDNode` class. However, based on the code snippet provided, it is likely that the next statement will be a call to the `getConstantPool` method of the `ConstantPoolSDNode` class, as this is the only method that is called on the `N` variable in the code snippet. Here is a possible next statement: ``` ConstantPoolSDNode * pool = N->" LLVM,RISCV,2967,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `unsigned Depth = cast < ConstantSDNode > ( Op . getOperand ( ) ) -> getZExtValue ( ) ;` This line of code is casting the operand at index `` of the `Op` object to a `ConstantSDNode`, and then extracting the zero-extended value of that node. The resulting value is stored in the `Depth` variable." LLVM,RISCV,2968,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return Addr;` This is because the code checks if the offset is not equal to a specific value (represented by ``), and if it is not, it returns the result of `DAG.getPointerAdd(DL, Addr, Offset)`. If the offset is equal to the specific value, the code simply returns `Addr`." LLVM,RISCV,2969,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet without knowing the context in which it is being executed. However, based on the code snippet provided, it appears to be related to the analysis of a global address. The code snippet defines a pointer `N` to a `GlobalAddressSDNode` object, which is a type of node in a global address space. The `getOffset()` method is called on `N` to retrieve the offset of the global address, and the result is stored in a variable `Offset`. The `getGlobal()` method is then called on `N` to retrieve" LLVM,RISCV,2970,"The next statement after the `switch` block is `if (Offset != ) return DAG.getPointerAdd(DL, Addr, Offset);`. The `switch` block is checking the value of `TLSModel` and setting `Addr` accordingly. If `TLSModel` is `LocalDynamic` or `GeneralDynamic`, it sets `Addr` to the result of `getDynamicTLSAddr(N, Ty, DAG)`. Otherwise, it sets `Addr` to the result of `getStaticTLSAddr(N, Ty" LLVM,RISCV,2971,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it appears to be a part of a larger function and the context is not provided. However, based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the next statement will be a case statement, possibly with a switch statement. The case statement will likely be checking for different values of the ""IntNo"" variable, and will execute different code based on the value of ""IntNo""." LLVM,RISCV,2972,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet without knowing the specific implementation of the `lowerJumpTable` method and the `SelectionDAG` class. However, based on the name of the method and the parameters it takes, it appears to be related to lowering a jump table in a compiler. The `lowerJumpTable` method is likely to be a part of a compiler's code generation phase, where it takes a high-level representation of a jump table and generates the corresponding machine code. The `SelectionDAG` parameter is likely to be a data structure that represents the control" LLVM,RISCV,2973,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the code depends on the specific values of the variables and the implementation of the `getValueType` and `getAddr` functions. However, based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the next statement after the `return` statement is likely to be the end of the function, as there are no more statements after the `return` statement. It is also possible that the `return` statement is within a loop or conditional block, in which case the next statement after the `return` statement would" LLVM,RISCV,2974,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `int Off = - XLenInBytes;` This statement declares a variable `Off` and initializes it to the negative of the value of `XLenInBytes`. The value of `XLenInBytes` is not specified in the code snippet, so it is not possible to determine the exact value of `Off`. However, it is likely that `XLenInBytes` is a constant value that represents the length of a memory block or the size of a data type, and `Off` is used to compute an offset into that memory block or" LLVM,RISCV,2975,"The next statement of the code snippet is: `SDValue Ops[ ] = { LHS, RHS, TargetCC, TrueV, FalseV };` This line declares an array of `SDValue` objects named `Ops`, which will be used as the operands for the `getNode` method. The array contains five elements: `LHS`, `RHS`, `TargetCC`, `TrueV`, and `FalseV`. These values are all of type `SDValue`, and they are used as the operands for the `getNode` method." LLVM,RISCV,2976,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `SDValue TargetCC = DAG . getTargetConstant ( CCVal , DL , XLenVT ) ;` This line of code creates a new `SDValue` called `TargetCC` and initializes it with the result of the `getTargetConstant` method of the `DAG` object, passing in the `CCVal` variable, the `DL` variable, and the `XLenVT` variable as arguments. The `getTargetConstant` method is used to create a new constant value that is compatible with" LLVM,RISCV,2977,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `cast` function and the `getValue` method. However, based on the names of the variables and methods, it is likely that the next statement will be something like: `const Value * SV = cast < SrcValueSDNode > ( Op . getOperand ( ) ) -> getValue ( ) ;` This statement is casting the result of the `getOperand` method of the `Op` object to a `SrcValueSD" LLVM,RISCV,2978,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `Ops.push_back(SetCC->getOperand());` This statement is adding the operand of the `SetCC` node at index `` to the `Ops` vector. The `Ops` vector is used to store the operands of the `SetCC` node, and this statement is adding the last operand to the vector." LLVM,RISCV,2979,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return AtomicExpansionKind :: None;` The `if` statement checks if the size of the compare operand is equal to `` or ``, and if the target ABI is not ``. If the condition is true, the function returns `AtomicExpansionKind :: MaskedIntrinsic`. Otherwise, it returns `AtomicExpansionKind :: None`." LLVM,RISCV,2980,"The next statement after the `if` block will be the `return` statement. The `if` block will be executed if the condition `(Size == || Size == )` is true and the condition `! (Subtarget . getTargetABI ( ))` is false. If the `if` block is executed, the function will return `AtomicExpansionKind :: MaskedIntrinsic`. If the `if` block is not executed, the function will return `AtomicExpansionKind" LLVM,RISCV,2981,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be: `if (Size < 32) return AtomicExpansionKind::CmpXChg;` This is because the `getPrimitiveSizeInBits()` method returns the size of the type in bits, and the `isFloatingPointOperation()` method checks if the operation is a floating-point operation. If the size of the type is less than 32 bits, the `CmpXChg` atomic expansion kind is returned." LLVM,RISCV,2982,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the implementation of the `getTargetABI()` method and the specific subtarget being used. However, based on the name of the method and the context in which it is being called, it is likely that the next statement will be related to the ABI (Application Binary Interface) of the target platform." LLVM,RISCV,2983,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return false;` The code checks if the pointer type is a fat pointer, and if the target ABI is not a string literal. If the pointer type is a fat pointer and the target ABI is not a string literal, the code returns false." LLVM,RISCV,2984,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific values of the variables and the behavior of the functions being called. However, based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the next statement will be a switch statement that checks the value of `VA . getLocInfo ( )`. The switch statement will likely have multiple cases, each of which will perform a different action based on the value of `VA . getLocInfo ( )`. Without more information about the specific values of the variables and the behavior of the functions being called, it is not possible to" LLVM,RISCV,2985,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the `hasSplatOperand` function depends on the specific implementation of the `Operand` class and the `splat` method. However, based on the name of the function and the fact that it is declared as a `const` method, it is likely that the function returns a boolean value indicating whether the `Operand` object has a splat operand. The `splat` method is typically used to create a new operand that is a copy of the original operand, but" LLVM,RISCV,2986,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty because the behavior of the code depends on the input data and the specific implementation of the `customLegalizeToWOp` and `customLegalizeToWOpWithSExt` functions, which are not provided in the code snippet. However, based on the code snippet, it appears that the code is handling a switch statement with multiple cases, and each case is handling a different type of operation. The code is using the `customLegalizeToWOp` and `customLegalizeToWOpWithSExt" LLVM,RISCV,2987,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `BitVector ReservedRegs = Subtarget.getRegisterInfo().getReservedRegs(MF);` This line initializes a `BitVector` called `ReservedRegs` with the reserved registers for the current subtarget and machine function. The `getReservedRegs` method is called on the `RegisterInfo` object, which is a member of the `Subtarget` class. The `MF` parameter is a machine function object that is used to determine the reserved registers for the current subtarget." LLVM,RISCV,2988,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `if ( ! Value . getNode ( ) ) {` This is because the previous statement, `if ( ! isa < ConstantFPSDNode > ( V ) && ! isa < ConstantSDNode > ( V ) ) isConstant = false ;`, has an `else` clause that is not shown in the code snippet. Therefore, if the `else` clause is executed, the next statement will be the `if` statement with the condition `! Value . getNode ( )`." LLVM,RISCV,2989,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `LLVM_DEBUG(dbgs() << ""Building vector with "" << NumElts << "" elements\n"");` This statement is a debug print statement that prints a message to the debug output stream indicating that the code is building a vector with the specified number of elements. The message includes the number of elements in the vector, which is obtained from the `NumElts` variable." LLVM,RISCV,2990,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific values of the variables and the behavior of the `DAG` and `Op` objects. However, based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the next statement will be another `else if` statement, as there are no other statements in the code snippet that could be executed after the `else if` statements. The next `else if` statement will check if `VT` is equal to ``, and if so, it will return a value using the `DAG" LLVM,RISCV,2991,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet without knowing the specific values of the variables and the behavior of the functions being called. However, based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the next statement will be a `return` statement, as the code is currently in a `case` block and the `return` statement is the last statement in the block. The `return` statement will return a value of type `SDValue`, which is a type defined in the code snippet. The value being returned is the result of a function call, and the function being called is determined by the value of" LLVM,RISCV,2992,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `BuildMI(HeadMBB, DL, TII.get(Opcode)).addReg(LHS).addReg(RHS).addMBB(TailMBB);` This statement creates a new machine instruction (MI) and adds the LHS and RHS registers as operands. It also adds the TailMBB basic block as a successor of the HeadMBB basic block. The Opcode parameter is used to determine the type of branch instruction to be created." LLVM,RISCV,2993,The next statement in the code snippet is `return C_RegisterClass;`. LLVM,RISCV,2994,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be the initialization of the `RegsToPass` vector with the register locations and values to pass to the function. The code snippet is part of a function that generates a call sequence for a function call, and it is using the LLVM DAG (Directed Acyclic Graph) to represent the instructions. The `RegsToPass` vector is a `SmallVector` of `std::pair` that will hold the register locations and values to pass to the function. The code snippet is initializing the `Reg" LLVM,RISCV,2995,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific inputs and the behavior of the `report_fatal_error` function. However, based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the next statement will be a `return` statement, as the `case` statements are all returning values. Without more information about the inputs and the behavior of the `report_fatal_error` function, it is not possible to predict the exact value that will be returned. However, based on the code snippet provided, it is likely that the next statement will" LLVM,RISCV,2996,"Based on the code snippet provided, it is difficult to predict the next statement with certainty. However, based on the pattern of the code, it is likely that the next statement will be another call to `setOperationAction` with the same arguments as the previous call. The code appears to be setting up a series of actions for a load or store operation, with each action being defined by a call to `setOperationAction`. The first argument to `setOperationAction` is the name of the action, the second argument is the length of the operation, and the third argument is the type of the operation. The" LLVM,RISCV,2997,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the `setOperationAction` function is not known. However, based on the syntax and the fact that the function is called multiple times with the same arguments, it is likely that the function is being used to set the operation action for a specific operation or set of operations. Without more information about the `setOperationAction` function and the context in which it is being used, it is not possible to provide a more specific answer." LLVM,RISCV,2998,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `TargetLowering` function and the input parameters passed to it. However, based on the name of the function and the fact that it is being called from within a loop, it is likely that the next statement will involve some kind of lowering or transformation of the target object, possibly involving the use of a loop or other control structure. Without more information, it is not possible to provide a more specific prediction." LLVM,RISCV,2999,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `TargetLowering` function and the input parameters passed to it. However, based on the name of the function and the fact that it is being called from within a loop, it is likely that the next statement will involve some kind of lowering or transformation of the target object, possibly involving the use of a loop or other control structure. Without more information, it is not possible to provide a more specific prediction." LLVM,RISCV,3000,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific values of the variables and the behavior of the functions being called. However, based on the context and the structure of the code, it appears that the next statement will be a call to the `DAG.getCopyToReg` method, which is used to copy a value from a register to another register. The method takes several arguments, including the chain of operations, the data layout, the destination register, the value to be copied, and a glue value. The glue value is used to ensure that the" LLVM,RISCV,3001,"Based on the code snippet you provided, it appears to be related to the generation of machine code for a target architecture. The code is initializing a `CCState` object with information about the calling convention and function arguments, and then analyzing the output arguments to determine how they should be returned. The next statement is likely to be the start of a loop that iterates over the output arguments, as indicated by the `for` loop syntax. The loop variable `i` is initialized to the size of the `RVLocs` vector, and the loop will continue until `i` is greater than or equal" LLVM,RISCV,3002,"This code snippet is a part of a function that is checking the validity of the arguments passed to the function. It is using a loop to iterate over the arguments and check their validity using the `CC_` function. The next statement of this code snippet is: `llvm_unreachable(nullptr);` This statement is a part of the `llvm` library and is used to indicate that the code should not be reached. It is used in this context to indicate that the code should not be reached if the argument is not valid." LLVM,RISCV,3003,"This code snippet is checking if the current instruction is a return instruction (`IsRet` is true) and if the value being returned is a constant integer (`CC_` is true). If both conditions are true, it prints a debug message and then calls `llvm_unreachable`, which is a function that is not intended to be called and will likely cause a crash. Therefore, the next statement of this code snippet is likely to be a crash or an error message." LLVM,RISCV,3004,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific values of the variables and the behavior of the functions being called. However, based on the context and the code structure, it appears that the next statement is likely to be a call to the `CC_` function, which is a part of the LLVM code generation framework. The `CC_` function is used to generate code for a specific instruction set architecture (ISA) and is typically called by the LLVM code generator to generate code for" LLVM,RISCV,3005,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific values of the variables and the behavior of the functions called. However, based on the code snippet, it appears that the next statement will be the start of a loop that iterates over the elements of the `Outs` vector. The loop will iterate over the elements of `Outs` from index `` to the end of the vector. For each element, the code will retrieve the `VT` and `Flags` fields of the element and pass them to the `CC_" LLVM,RISCV,3006,"Based on the code snippet you provided, it appears to be a part of a function that is initializing a vector of values and then iterating over the vector to perform some operation on each element. The next statement of the code snippet is likely to be the body of the for loop, which is not provided in the snippet you shared. However, based on the code snippet you provided, it is likely that the body of the for loop will perform some operation on the current element of the vector, which is represented by the variable `Outs[i]`. The operation performed on the current element will depend on the specific implementation" LLVM,RISCV,3007,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be: `ArgValue = unpackFromRegLoc(DAG, Chain, VA, DL);` This is because the code is currently iterating over the `ArgLocs` vector, and the `VA` variable is being used to represent the current argument location. The `VA` variable is being checked to see if it is a register location or a memory location, and if it is a register location, the `unpackFromRegLoc` function is being called to unpack the argument value from the register location. It" LLVM,RISCV,3008,"Based on the code snippet provided, it is difficult to predict the next statement with certainty. However, based on the context and the structure of the code, it is likely that the next statement will be another iteration of the loop, with the variable `i` being incremented by 1 and the loop continuing until the condition `i < e` is no longer true. The loop is iterating over the elements of the `RVLocs` vector, and for each element, it is performing some operations using the `DAG` object and the `CCValAssign` class. The `Ret" LLVM,RISCV,3009,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific values of the variables and the implementation of the `setOperationAction` function. However, based on the code provided, it appears that the `setOperationAction` function is being called multiple times with different values of the `VT` variable, and the `XLenVT` variable is being passed as the second argument to the function. The `setOperationAction` function is likely being used to set the action for a specific operation, and the `VT` variable is being used to specify the" LLVM,RISCV,3010,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific values of the variables and the behavior of the `getTargetNode` and `getMachineNode` functions. However, based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the next statement will be a `return` statement that returns a value of type `SDValue`. The `SDValue` constructor is called with two arguments: a machine node and a number literal. The machine node is constructed using the `getMachineNode` function, which takes several arguments including a string literal, a data layout, a type, and" LLVM,RISCV,3011,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `getTargetNode` and `getMachineNode` functions, as well as the values of the variables `N`, `DL`, `Ty`, `DAG`, and ``. However, based on the names of the functions and the variables, it is likely that the next statement will be a call to `getMachineNode` with the same arguments as the previous call, but with a different first argument. The first argument is likely to be a different machine node," LLVM,RISCV,3012,"The next statement after the `if` statement in the code snippet you provided is the `report_fatal_error` function call. The `report_fatal_error` function is called with a string literal as its argument, which is the error message that will be displayed to the user. The function will then terminate the program with the specified error message. Therefore, the next statement after the `if` statement in the code snippet you provided is the `report_fatal_error` function call, which will terminate the program with the specified error message if the `isPositionIndependent" LLVM,RISCV,3013,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `SDValue Result = DAG.getBlockAddress(N->getFunction(), N->getBasicBlock());` This statement is creating a new `SDValue` object called `Result` and initializing it with the result of the `getBlockAddress` method of the `DAG` object, passing in the function and basic block associated with the `BlockAddressSDNode` object `N`." LLVM,RISCV,3014,"The next statement after the `if` statement in the code snippet you provided is the `report_fatal_error` function call. The `report_fatal_error` function is called with a string literal as its argument, which is the error message that will be displayed to the user. The function will then terminate the program with the specified error message. Therefore, the next statement after the `if` statement in the code snippet you provided is the `report_fatal_error` function call, which will terminate the program with the specified error message if the `isPositionIndependent" LLVM,RISCV,3015,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `SDValue Addr = getAddr(N, DAG);` This line of code is calling the `getAddr` function, which is not defined in the code snippet you provided. It is likely that this function is defined elsewhere in the codebase and is used to retrieve the address of the global variable being accessed. The `Addr` variable is then used in the following line of code to create a new node in the selection DAG." LLVM,RISCV,3016,"Based on the code snippet you provided, it appears that the `Op` object is being passed to various methods to perform different operations based on the opcode returned by `Op.getOpcode()`. The `report_fatal_error()` method is called with a string literal as an argument if the opcode is not recognized. The next statement in the code snippet is `case : return lowerShiftRightParts ( Op , DAG , false ) ;`. This means that if the opcode returned by `Op.getOpcode()` is equal to the string literal `isImplicitDef()) TailAgnostic = true;` This statement checks if the `UseMI` instruction is an implicit definition (i.e., it defines a register but does not have a corresponding instruction in the machine code), and if so, sets `TailAgnostic` to `true`. The purpose of this check is to determine whether the instruction is tail-agnostic, meaning that it does not depend on the current state of the program's control flow. If the instruction is tail" LLVM,RISCV,3019,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `MI = MRI.getVRegDef(MI->getOperand().getReg());` This statement assigns the result of the `getVRegDef` method of the `MRI` object to the `MI` variable, using the `getReg` method of the operand of `MI` as an argument. The `getVRegDef` method returns a pointer to the virtual register definition for the given register, or `nullptr` if the register is not a virtual register." LLVM,RISCV,3020,"Based on the code snippet you provided, it appears to be a switch statement that is handling different cases based on the value of `MI.getOpcode()`. The `default` case is unreachable, and the other cases are handling specific opcodes. The next statement after the `default` case is `llvm_unreachable();`, which is a call to the `llvm_unreachable` function with a string literal argument. This function is used to indicate that the code should not be reached, and it is typically used to indicate a programming" LLVM,RISCV,3021,"Based on the code snippet provided, it is difficult to predict the next statement with certainty. However, we can make some observations and inferences based on the information provided. The code snippet appears to be part of a function that is handling a specific instruction in a processor. The function is checking the value of a flag, `TSFlags`, and based on its value, it is calling different functions to handle the instruction. The `if` statement checks if `TSFlags` is a string literal, and if it is, it sets the value of `VLIndex` and `SEWIndex` based" LLVM,RISCV,3022,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return DAG.getNode(, DL, VecVT, Lo);` This statement is reached if the `if` condition is not satisfied, and the `else` block is executed. The `else` block contains a single statement, which is the `return` statement." LLVM,RISCV,3023,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `Gather = DAG . getNode ( GatherOpc , DL , ContainerVT , V1 , LHSIndices , TrueMask , VL ) ;` This statement is a call to the `getNode` method of the `DAG` object, which creates a new node in the DAG with the specified opcode, data layout, and operands. The opcode is `GatherOpc`, which is a gather operation, and the operands are `V1`, `LHSIndices`, `TrueMask" LLVM,RISCV,3024,"This code snippet is creating a memory intrinsic node in the DAG (Directed Acyclic Graph) of the LLVM IR. The intrinsic node is being created with the following parameters: * `IntrinsicID`: The ID of the intrinsic being called. In this case, it is `llvm.mem.intrinsic`. * `DL`: The data layout of the target machine. * `VTs`: The list of value types (VTs) of the operands. * `Ops`: The list of operands. * `Align`:" LLVM,RISCV,3025,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific values of the variables and the behavior of the `cast` and `getSExtValue` functions. However, based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the next statement will be a return statement, as the `if` condition is met and the `return` statement is executed. The `return` statement will return a node with the specified value, which is constructed using the `getNode` function. The `getNode` function takes four arguments: the first is the type of the node to" LLVM,RISCV,3026,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be: `int32_t HiC = cast < ConstantSDNode > ( Hi ) -> getSExtValue ( );` This is because the code is checking if both `Lo` and `Hi` are constant nodes, and if they are, it is extracting the signed integer value from them. The next step would be to extract the signed integer value from `Hi` as well, and then perform some operation on the two values." LLVM,RISCV,3027,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `if ( ArgFlags . isSplitEnd ( ) && PendingLocs . size ( ) <= ) {` This is because the previous `if` statement was not executed, so the control flow continues to the next `if` statement. The condition `ArgFlags . isSplitEnd ( )` is true, and `PendingLocs . size ( )` is less than or equal to ``, so the body of the `if` statement is executed." LLVM,RISCV,3028,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be: `SDValue NewOp = DAG.getNode(, DL, , NewOp0);` This is because the code is using the `getNode` method of the `DAG` object to create a new node in the DAG, and the `NewOp0` variable is being passed as the third argument to the `getNode` method. The `NewOp` variable is likely to be the result of this method call, and it is being assigned to the `NewOp" LLVM,RISCV,3029,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `SDValue FPConv = DAG . getNode ( , DL , , NewOp0 ) ;` This statement creates a new SDValue `FPConv` by calling the `getNode` method of the `DAG` object with the following arguments: * The first argument is ``, which is a string literal that represents the name of the instruction. * The second argument is `DL`, which is a `SDLoc` object that" LLVM,RISCV,3030,"Based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the next statement will be a case statement for the instruction with opcode . The case statement will check if the operand of the instruction is a constant integer and if so, it will return a combined value. If the operand is not a constant integer, it will break out of the switch statement." LLVM,RISCV,3031,"Based on the code snippet provided, it is difficult to predict the next statement with certainty. However, based on the context of the code, it appears that the next statement could be a case statement for a different opcode. The code snippet is part of a function that appears to be handling different opcodes for a demand-driven compiler. The function is checking the opcode of the current node and performing different actions based on the opcode. The next statement is likely to be a case statement for a different opcode, possibly one that is related to the current opcode. Without more context or" LLVM,RISCV,3032,"The next statement in the code snippet is: `setOperationAction(, , Expand);` This statement sets the operation action for a specific operation and operand type to ""Expand"", which means that the operation should be expanded into a sequence of simpler operations. The `` placeholders are replaced with actual string literals that represent the operation and operand type." LLVM,RISCV,3033,"Based on the code snippet provided, it is difficult to predict the next statement with certainty. However, based on the context and the patterns observed in the code, it is likely that the next statement will be another call to the `setOperationAction` function, possibly with a different set of arguments. The `setOperationAction` function appears to be used to set the action for a particular operation, and the arguments passed to the function are used to specify the operation, the target, and the action to be taken. The function is called multiple times in the code snippet, with different arguments, to set the actions for" LLVM,RISCV,3034,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty because it is not clear what the values of the variables `Base`, `Op`, and `` are. However, based on the code snippet, it appears that the next statement will be an `else if` statement that checks if `Base` is equal to the result of `Op -> getOperand ( )`. If this condition is true, then the statement `Offset = Op -> getOperand ( ) ;` will be executed." LLVM,RISCV,3035,"The next statement after the code snippet you provided is: `Base = LS -> getBasePtr ( ) ;` This statement is inside the `if` block that checks if `N` is a `LSBaseSDNode`. If `N` is a `LSBaseSDNode`, then the `getBasePtr()` method is called on `LS` to get the base pointer, and the result is stored in the `Base` variable." LLVM,RISCV,3036,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be another `case` statement, as the code is using a `switch` statement to handle different cases. The next `case` statement is likely to be `case : return lowerINTRINSIC_WO_CHAIN ( Op , DAG ) ;`." LLVM,RISCV,3037,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific values of the variables and the behavior of the functions being called. However, based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the next statement will be a case statement, possibly with a switch statement that checks the value of a variable. The code snippet is part of a function that appears to be legalizing instructions for a 64-bit target architecture. The function takes a node (representing an instruction) and a DAG (representing the data flow graph) as inputs, and it returns" LLVM,RISCV,3038,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific values of the variables and the behavior of the functions being called. However, based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the next statement will be a `case` statement, as the previous `case` statement has not been fully processed. The next `case` statement will likely be one of the following: * `case :` * `case :` * `case :` It" LLVM,RISCV,3039,"The next statement after the `switch` statement is the `return` statement. The `switch` statement is checking the value of `I.getOpcode()` and executing different blocks of code based on the value. The `return` statement is executed after the `switch` statement has finished executing, regardless of which block of code was executed. Therefore, the next statement after the `switch` statement is the `return` statement." LLVM,RISCV,3040,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be: `SDValue VL = DAG . getConstant ( VT . getVectorNumElements ( ) , DL , XLenVT ) ;` This statement is creating a new SDValue `VL` that represents a constant value with the number of elements in the vector `VT`. The `getConstant` method is called on the `DAG` object, which is a class that represents a directed acyclic graph (DAG) of values. The `getConstant` method takes three arguments: the value" LLVM,RISCV,3041,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it appears to be part of a larger program and the context is not provided. However, based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the next statement will likely be a call to a function or method that takes a variable number of arguments, possibly related to memory management or data processing. The code snippet defines a switch statement with a single case, which is the default case. The default case is empty, meaning that if the value of the integer variable `IntNo` is not equal to any of the other cases, the code inside" LLVM,RISCV,3042,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific inputs and the behavior of the `cast` and `getMask` methods. However, based on the code provided, it is likely that the next statement will be: `Mask = MLoad->getMask(); PassThru = MLoad->getPassThru();` This is because the `MLoad` variable is assigned the result of the `cast` method, which is likely to be a `MaskedLoadSDNode` object. The `getMask` and `getPassTh" LLVM,RISCV,3043,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet without knowing the context and the purpose of the code. However, based on the code provided, it appears that the next statement could be a comparison or a branch statement that checks the value of the `Val` variable. The code snippet is using the `dyn_cast` function to check if the `Op` variable is a `VPStoreSDNode` or a `MaskedStoreSDNode`. If it is a `VPStoreSDNode`, the code retrieves the value, mask, and vector length from the node. If it is a `" LLVM,RISCV,3044,"The next statement after the `if` block is the `return V` statement. The `if` block checks whether the `transformAddShlImm` function returns a non-null value. If it does, the `if` block returns the value returned by `transformAddShlImm`. If it doesn't, the `if` block falls through to the next statement, which is the `return V` statement. Therefore, the next statement after the `if` block is the `return V` statement." LLVM,RISCV,3045,"The next statement after the `if` statement will be the `return` statement. The `if` statement checks whether the `transformAddShlImm` function returns a non-null value. If it does, the function returns the value returned by `transformAddShlImm`. If it doesn't, the function returns the result of the `combineSelectAndUseCommutative` function. Therefore, the next statement after the `if` statement will be the `return` statement that returns the result of the `combineSelectAndUseCommutative` function." LLVM,RISCV,3046,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `Instruction * Op = dyn_cast (OpIdx.value().get());` This line of code is using the `dyn_cast` function to cast the value of `OpIdx.value()` to an `Instruction` pointer. The `dyn_cast` function is a safe version of the `cast` function that checks if the cast is valid before performing it. If the cast is not valid, the function returns a null pointer. The `OpIdx.value()` expression is used" LLVM,RISCV,3047,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `Instruction * Insn = cast < Instruction > ( U . getUser ( ) ) ;` This line of code is casting the user of the use `U` to an `Instruction` pointer, and storing the result in the variable `Insn`." LLVM,RISCV,3048,"Based on the code snippet you provided, it appears to be a part of a switch statement. The next statement after the `case 'f'` label would be the code block associated with that label. In this case, the code block associated with the `case 'f'` label is: ``` if (Subtarget.hasStdExtF() && VT == ) return std::make_pair(, &); if (Subtarget.hasStdExtD() && VT == , DL , RegTy , rawResult , mask ) ;` This statement creates a new SDValue object named `finalResult` and initializes it with the result of a call to the `getNode` method of the `DAG` object, passing in the following arguments: * ``: A string literal representing the name of the instruction to be executed. * `DL`: The data layout of the target machine. *" LLVM,RISCV,3057,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `Op` class and the values of the operands. However, based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the next statement is likely to be a call to the `getValueType()` method of the `Op` class, which returns the value type of the operand at the specified index. Here is a possible next statement: ``` EVT Ty = Op.getValueType(pos); ``` This statement retrieves the value type of the operand at the position specified" LLVM,RISCV,3058,"Based on the code snippet provided, it appears to be a part of a function that is performing some kind of legalization or transformation of a data structure. The function is handling a switch statement with multiple cases, and each case is handling a different type of data. The next statement that will be executed is the `break` statement, which will exit the switch statement and continue executing the code outside of the switch block." LLVM,RISCV,3059,"Based on the code snippet you provided, it appears to be a part of a function that is legalizing instructions for a 64-bit target. The function is handling several different cases, each of which is checking a different condition and performing a different action. The next statement in the code snippet is: case : This is the start of a new case block, which is checking whether the value type of the current node is a string literal. If it is, the function is performing some additional checks and then calling the customLegalizeToWOp function with the current" LLVM,RISCV,3060,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `setOperationAction(, XLenVT, Custom);` This statement sets the operation action for the given string literal and XLenVT to Custom." LLVM,RISCV,3061,"Based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the next statement will be: `setOperationAction(, , Custom);` This is because the previous statement is `setOperationAction(, , Expand);`, and the next statement after that is `setOperationAction(, , Custom);`. The pattern of alternating between `Expand` and `Custom` actions for the `setOperationAction` function is consistent throughout the code snippet." LLVM,RISCV,3062,"The next statement is likely to be: `setOperationAction(, , Custom)` This is because the previous statement is a conditional statement that checks if the subtarget has the `StdExtF` extension, and if it does, it sets the operation action for several instructions to `Expand`. If the subtarget does not have the `StdExtF` extension, the next statement is likely to be `setOperationAction(, , Custom)`." LLVM,RISCV,3063,"Based on the code snippet provided, it is difficult to predict the next statement with certainty. However, based on the context and the structure of the code, it is likely that the next statement will be a case statement or a default statement. The code snippet appears to be part of a switch statement that is handling different cases for a specific operation. The switch statement is checking the opcode of a node (N) and then executing different code based on the opcode. The cases in the switch statement are handling different opcodes, and the default case is handling any opcode that is not explicitly handled by one of the" LLVM,RISCV,3064,"Based on the code snippet you provided, it appears to be a part of a function that is handling the legalization of instructions for a specific target architecture. The function is checking the type of the instruction and its operands, and based on that, it is generating new instructions to replace the original instruction. The next statement of the code snippet you provided is: `Results.push_back(customLegalizeToWOp(N, DAG));` This statement is adding a new instruction to the `Results` vector, which is a list of instructions that will be used to replace the original" LLVM,RISCV,3065,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be: `MIB.addReg(DestReg, RegState::Define | RegState::Dead).addReg(MI.getOperand(VLIndex).getReg());` This is because the previous statement in the code snippet is `if (VLIndex >= ) {`, which means that the code inside the `if` block will only be executed if `VLIndex` is greater than or equal to ``. If `VLIndex` is greater than or equal to" LLVM,RISCV,3066,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `TailAgnostic = false;`" LLVM,RISCV,3067,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `Known . resetAll ( ) ;` This statement resets all the bits in the `Known` object to zero, which is necessary because the `computeKnownBitsForTargetNode` method is called for each node in the selection DAG, and we want to make sure that we start with a clean slate for each node." LLVM,RISCV,3068,"The next statement of this code snippet is: Known = Known . sext ( BitWidth ) ;" LLVM,RISCV,3069,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return Subtarget.getXLen() - Op.getOperand().getScalarValueSizeInBits() + ;` This statement is executed when the case label is ``. It returns the difference between the size of the operand in bits and the size of the target register in bits, plus a constant value." LLVM,RISCV,3070,"Based on the code snippet provided, it appears to be a part of a function that is handling the encoding of a specific instruction in a processor. The function is checking the opcode of the instruction and performing different actions based on the opcode. The next statement of the code snippet is likely to be a case statement that handles the specific opcode of the instruction. The case statement will likely contain code that performs the actual encoding of the instruction, using the information provided in the function arguments and the values of the variables declared in the function. Without more context or information about the specific instruction being encoded, it is" LLVM,RISCV,3071,The next statement after the `switch` block is `return nullptr;`. LLVM,RISCV,3072,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet without knowing the specific values of the variables and the context in which the code is being executed. However, based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the next statement will be a call to the `getNode` method of the `DAG` object, passing in the `VecVT` variable as the first argument, and the `DL` variable as the second argument. The third argument will likely be a constant value, and the fourth argument will be a reference to the `Vec` variable. The fifth argument will be a reference to the `Val`" LLVM,RISCV,3073,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return SDValue ( ) ;`" LLVM,RISCV,3074,"The next statement in this code snippet is likely to be a `case` statement, as the code is checking the value of `Op.getOpcode()` and branching based on its value. The next `case` statement is likely to be `case :`, which is a string literal that represents the opcode for a specific instruction." LLVM,RISCV,3075,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific values of the placeholders and the implementation of the `getNode` and `getConstant` methods. However, based on the information provided, it appears that the code is working with a vector of 32-bit integers, and is trying to create a new vector with the values of the original vector shifted by 32 bits. The first few lines of the code snippet define some constants and variables: * `One` is a constant with the value 1. *" LLVM,RISCV,3076,"The next statement of this code snippet is: return DAG.getNode(ISD::SPLAT_VECTOR, DL, VecVT, SplatVal, Zero);" LLVM,RISCV,3077,"Based on the code snippet, it appears that the next statement will be: `SplatZero = DAG.getSplatVector(VecVT, DL, SplatZero);` This is because the code checks if `IsRV32E64` is true, and if it is, it sets `SplatZero` to a splat vector with the same element type as `VecVT` and the value of `SplatZero`. If `IsRV32E64` is false, the code does not modify `Spl" LLVM,RISCV,3078,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `SDValue Result = DAG.getNode(ISD::VSELECT, DL, VecVT, Src, SplatOne, SplatZero);` This statement creates a new SDValue called `Result` using the `getNode` method of the `DAG` object. The `getNode` method takes several parameters: * `ISD::VSELECT`: This is the opcode for the `VSELECT` instruction, which is used to select elements from a vector based on a mask. * `DL" LLVM,RISCV,3079,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `if (NewMask == Mask) return true;` This statement checks if the new mask `NewMask` is equal to the original mask `Mask`. If they are equal, the function returns `true`, indicating that the optimization has been successful." LLVM,RISCV,3080,"Based on the code snippet you provided, it appears that the next statement will be: SDValue NewRHS = DAG.getNode(, DL, RHS.getValueType(), RHS, DAG.getValueType(EVT::getIntegerVT(*DAG.getContext(), ))); This statement creates a new node in the DAG (Directed Acyclic Graph) representing the right-hand side (RHS) of the operation. The node is created using the DAG.getNode() method, which takes several" LLVM,RISCV,3081,"Based on the code snippet you provided, it appears to be a part of a function that is trying to perform some kind of optimization or transformation on a data structure. The function is checking the operands of a node in the data structure and trying to combine them in some way. Without more context, it is difficult to say exactly what the next statement of the code snippet will be. However, based on the pattern of the code, it is likely that the next statement will be another case statement, possibly with a similar structure to the previous case statements. The next case statement may be checking the operands of the node" LLVM,RISCV,3082,"The code snippet is checking if the current node `N` is a load or store operation, and if it is, it is getting the base pointer of the operation. If the base pointer is equal to a specific operand of the current instruction `Op`, then it is setting the offset to that operand. Based on this information, the next statement of the code snippet is likely to be: `Offset = Op -> getOperand ( ) ;` This statement is setting the offset to the operand of the current instruction `Op` that is at position `<" LLVM,RISCV,3083,"Based on the code snippet provided, it is difficult to predict the next statement with certainty. However, based on the context and the structure of the code, it is likely that the next statement will be another case statement or a default statement. The code snippet appears to be part of a switch statement that is handling different cases for a specific operation. The cases are identified by a string literal, and the code for each case is executed based on the value of the string literal. The next statement is likely to be another case statement or a default statement, as the current statement is part of a switch statement. The" LLVM,RISCV,3084,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific values of the variables and the behavior of the functions called. However, based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the next statement will be the creation of a new machine instruction builder object using the `BuildMI` function. The `BuildMI` function takes several arguments, including a basic block, a machine instruction, a data layout, a target-specific instruction info, and a register. The function returns a new machine instruction builder object that can be used to construct a new machine instruction. In the code" LLVM,RISCV,3085,"Based on the code snippet you provided, it appears to be a switch statement that is emitting different instructions based on the value of the `MI` parameter. The `MI` parameter is an instance of a class that has a `getOpcode()` method, and the switch statement is checking the return value of this method to determine which instruction to emit. The `emitCALL()` function is called when the `MI` parameter has an opcode of ``. The `emitPEXTRACT()` function is called when the `MI` parameter has an opcode of `get(opcode) );` This line creates a new `MachineInstrBuilder` object called `pbclrMI`, which is used to build a new machine instruction. The `BuildMI` function is called with the current basic block (`BB`), the current machine instruction (`MI`), the data layout (`DL`), and the opcode of the instruction to be built (`opcode`). The `opcode` is obtained from the" LLVM,RISCV,3087,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be: `pbclrMI.addOperand(MI.getOperand());` This is because the previous statement, `pbclrMI = BuildMI(*BB, MI, DL, TII->get(opcode));`, creates a new `MachineInstrBuilder` object called `pbclrMI`, and the next statement is likely to be adding operands to this object. The operand being added in this statement is `MI.getOperand()" LLVM,RISCV,3088,"This code snippet is a part of a larger program that appears to be generating machine code for a specific instruction set architecture. The code is using a library or framework to generate the machine code, and the specific instructions being generated are not immediately clear from the code snippet. However, based on the variable names and the context of the code, it appears that the code is generating a machine code instruction that performs a bitwise operation on two operands. The instruction is being generated using a library or framework that provides a set of functions for generating machine code instructions, and the specific instruction being generated is determined by the value of the `" LLVM,RISCV,3089,"Based on the code snippet you provided, it appears to be a part of a function that is trying to generate machine code for a specific instruction. The code is checking if the sum of two immediate values (imm2 and imm3) is less than or equal to a certain value (NUM_LIT). If the condition is true, it creates a new machine instruction (newMI) and adds some operands and immediate values to it. If the condition is false, it creates a new machine instruction with a different opcode (TII->get()). Without knowing the specific values" LLVM,RISCV,3090,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be the creation of a new `MachineInstrBuilder` object called `pinsertMI`. This object is created using the `BuildMI` function, which takes several arguments, including the basic block `BB`, the machine instruction `MI`, the debug location `DL`, and the opcode for the `pinsert` instruction. The `pinsertMI` object is then used to add operands and immediate values to the `pinsert` instruction." LLVM,RISCV,3091,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific values of the variables and the behavior of the functions being called. However, based on the code provided, it appears that the next statement will be: `paddrnMI . addOperand ( MI . getOperand ( reg1 ) ) ;` This is because the previous statement was `paddrnMI . addOperand ( MI . getOperand ( reg2 ) ) ;`, and the next operand to be added to `paddrnMI` is `reg" LLVM,RISCV,3092,"Based on the code snippet provided, it is difficult to predict the next statement with certainty. However, we can make some observations and inferences based on the code. Firstly, the code appears to be related to the manipulation of machine instructions (MI) and basic blocks (BB) in a compiler. The `BuildMI` function is used to create a new machine instruction, while the `addMBB` function is used to add a basic block to a list. Secondly, the code snippet appears to be part of a larger function that is responsible for handling a specific type of instruction. The" LLVM,RISCV,3093,The next statement after the `default` case is the `case 'd'` statement. LLVM,RISCV,3094,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `OPCODE` macro and the values of the variables `Lo`, `FENCE`, `SELECT_CC`, `SMIN`, `UMIN`, `SMAX`, and `UMAX`. However, based on the names of the variables and the operations performed by the `OPCODE` macro, it is likely that the next statement will be a call to the `OPCODE` macro with the `SMIN` or `UMIN` operation, followed by a call to the `" LLVM,RISCV,3095,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the code depends on the specific values of the variables and the implementation of the OPCODE macro. However, based on the names of the OPCODEs and the fact that they are being called with different arguments, it is likely that this code is performing some kind of arithmetic or logical operation on the values of the variables. Without more information about the specific implementation of the OPCODE macro and the values of the variables, it is not possible to provide a more detailed prediction of the next statement of the code." LLVM,RISCV,3096,"The next statement in the code snippet is: case AtomicOrdering :: NotAtomic : This is because the code is using a switch statement to check the value of the `Op` object's `getConstantOperandVal()` method, which returns an `AtomicOrdering` enum value. The `NotAtomic` case is the first one that is checked, so it is the next statement that will be executed." LLVM,RISCV,3097,"The next statement of this code snippet is: unsigned pred = PI | PO | PR | PW ; This statement assigns the value of the bitwise OR of the variables PI, PO, PR, and PW to the variable pred." LLVM,RISCV,3098,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `OutChains.push_back(Store);` This statement adds the `Store` SDNode to the `OutChains` vector. The `Store` SDNode is created by the `DAG.getStore()` method, and it represents a store operation that writes the value of `ArgValue` to the memory location specified by `PtrOff`. The `PtrOff` SDValue is created by the `DAG.getFrameIndex()` method, and it represents the offset of the memory location in the frame. The `ArgValue` SDValue" LLVM,RISCV,3099,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be: `Glue = DAG.getNode(ISA_LIT, DL, RetOps, Chain);` This is because the code is setting up the `RetOps` vector with the return values, and then using `DAG.getNode` to create a new node with the `ISA_LIT` opcode and the `RetOps` vector as arguments. The `Chain` variable is also being passed as an argument to `DAG.getNode`, which suggests that the new node will" LLVM,RISCV,3100,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return SDValue ( ) ;` This statement is a return statement that returns an empty `SDValue` object. It is the last statement in the `lowerSELECT_CC` function, so it will be executed when the function is called." LLVM,RISCV,3101,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the code depends on the input data and the specific implementation of the `SELECT_CC` function. However, based on the name of the function and the parameters it takes, it is likely that the function is used to select a specific condition code (CC) from the `SDValue` object, and then use that CC to perform some operation on the data. Without more information about the specific implementation of the `SELECT_CC` function, it is not possible to provide a more detailed prediction of the" LLVM,RISCV,3102,"The next statement after the code snippet you provided is: `Prefix = StringRef(B, I - B);` This statement assigns a new value to the `Prefix` variable, which is a `StringRef` object. The new value is constructed by passing the `B` and `I - B` iterators to the `StringRef` constructor. The `B` iterator points to the beginning of the string, and `I - B` is the distance between the beginning of the string and the current position of the iterator `I`. This distance is used to construct a new `StringRef`" LLVM,RISCV,3103,"Based on the code snippet you provided, it appears to be a part of a function that is parsing a physical register. The function takes in a string `C`, a string `Prefix`, and an unsigned long long `Reg`, and returns a pair of booleans and a null pointer. The first part of the code checks if `R.first` is true, and if not, returns a pair of `` and a null pointer. The second part of the code checks if `R.second` is true, and if not, returns a pair of `` and" LLVM,RISCV,3104,"Based on the code snippet you provided, it appears to be parsing a physical register and returning a pair of values. The first value is a boolean indicating whether the parse was successful, and the second value is a pointer to the parsed register. The next statement in the code snippet is: if ( Prefix == ) { This statement checks if the Prefix variable is equal to a specific string literal. If it is, then the code inside the if statement will be executed. It's not possible to predict exactly what the code inside the if statement will do without" LLVM,RISCV,3105,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `DAG` class and the values of the variables involved. However, based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the next statement will be a call to the `computeKnownBits` method of the `DAG` class, passing in the result of the `getOperand` method of the `Op` object, the `Known2` object, and the sum of the `Depth` variable and a literal value. The `computeKnownBits`" LLVM,RISCV,3106,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `computeKnownBits` method and the values of the variables `Op`, `Known`, and `Depth`. However, based on the name of the method and the parameters it takes, it is likely that the next statement will involve computing the known bits of the operand of the instruction `Op` at the specified depth, and storing the result in the `KnownBits` object `Known2`." LLVM,RISCV,3107,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return TargetLowering::getConstraintType(Constraint);` This statement is executed when the `Constraint` string does not have a size of 1, or when the first character of the `Constraint` string is not 'A'. In this case, the function calls itself recursively with the same `Constraint` string, which will continue to execute until a match is found or the end of the function is reached." LLVM,RISCV,3108,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `lowerSETVL` function and the values of the `Op` and `DAG` variables. However, based on the syntax and the context of the code, it is likely that the next statement will be a call to the `lowerSETVL` function with the `Op` and `DAG` variables as arguments. Therefore, the next statement of this code snippet is likely to be: ``` return lowerSETVL(Op, DAG); ```" LLVM,RISCV,3109,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet without knowing the specific values of the variables and the implementation of the functions being called. However, based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the `default` case is handling an error condition, and the other cases are handling specific instructions. The `report_fatal_error` function is called with a string literal as an argument, which suggests that it is reporting an error message. The other functions being called, such as `lowerGlobalAddress`, `lowerBlockAddress`, `lowerConstantPool`, etc., are likely responsible for lowering the instruction" LLVM,RISCV,3110,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific values of the variables and the behavior of the functions being called. However, based on the pattern of the code, it is likely that the next statement will be another case statement with a similar structure to the ones shown above. The code appears to be using a switch statement to handle different types of operations, with each case statement handling a different type of operation. The case statements are checking the value of the `Op` variable and calling a different function depending on the value. The functions being called appear to be related" LLVM,RISCV,3111,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `SDLoc` and `SDVTList` classes, as well as the values of the `Op` and `XLenVT` variables. However, based on the code snippet provided, it is likely that the next statement will be a call to the `SDLoc` constructor, which will create a new `SDLoc` object with the specified `Op` and `XLenVT` values. The `SDLoc` object will then be used to create a new `" LLVM,RISCV,3112,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet without knowing the context and the specific implementation of the functions being called. However, based on the names of the variables and the functions being called, it appears that the code is working with a target machine and its registers. The `Subtarget` variable is likely an instance of a class that represents a target machine, and the `getXLenVT` function is likely a method of that class that returns the length of the target machine's registers in bits. The `DAG` variable is likely an instance of a class that represents a directed acyc" LLVM,RISCV,3113,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return DAG . getNode ( , DL , VT , SplatVal ) ;` This statement is executed if the condition `ElemVT == ` is true, which means that the `ElemVT` variable is equal to the string literal ``. In this case, the `getOperand` method is called on the `Op` object with the argument ``, which returns a `SDValue` object. This object" LLVM,RISCV,3114,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be: `return DAG . getNode ( , DL , VT , SplatVal ) ;` This is because the `if` statement checks whether `ElemVT` is equal to ``, and if it is, it sets `SplatVal` to the result of `Op.getOperand()`, and then returns the result of `DAG.getNode(, DL, VT, S" LLVM,RISCV,3115,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be: `MIB.addReg(DestReg, RegState::Define | RegState::Dead).addReg(MI.getOperand(VLIndex).getReg());` This is because the code is checking if the `VLIndex` is greater than or equal to a certain value, and if it is, it is creating a new virtual register `DestReg` and adding it to the machine instruction builder `MIB` with the `Define` and `Dead` states. It is then adding the register corresponding" LLVM,RISCV,3116,"Based on the code snippet, it appears to be related to the RISC-V instruction set architecture (ISA). The code is likely setting up a machine function (MF) and retrieving information about the instruction being executed. The next statement is likely to be a call to a function that will execute the instruction using the information retrieved from the machine function. The function may take the instruction's operands, the element width, and the multiplier as arguments. Without more context, it is difficult to provide a more specific answer. If you have any additional information about the code or the specific" LLVM,RISCV,3117,"Based on the code snippet you provided, it appears that the next statement will be: `case :` This is because the `switch` statement is checking the value of `MI.getOpcode()`, and the next value after `default` is ``." LLVM,RISCV,3118,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be the call to the `addVSetVL` function, which is defined in the same file as the `EmitInstrWithCustomInserter` function. The `addVSetVL` function is responsible for adding a new instruction to the machine code being generated, and it takes several parameters, including the `MachineInstr` object, the `MachineBasicBlock` object, and various indices and flags that determine the details of the instruction being added. The `EmitInstrWithCustomInserter` function is responsible for generating the" LLVM,RISCV,3119,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return VT.changeVectorElementTypeToInteger();` This is because the `if` statement checks if `VT` is a vector, and if it is not, it returns the pointer type. If `VT` is a vector, it checks if the subtarget has the `std::ext::v` extension, and if it does, it returns a string literal. Otherwise, it calls the `changeVectorElementTypeToInteger` method on `VT`." LLVM,RISCV,3120,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return getPointerTy(DL);` This is because the first `if` statement checks if `VT` is a vector, and if it is not, it returns the pointer type. The second `if` statement checks if the subtarget has the `std::ext::v` extension, and if it does, it returns a string literal. However, since the first `if` statement was not executed, the second `if` statement is not executed either, and the code continues to the next statement, which is `return getPointerTy(DL" LLVM,RISCV,3121,"Based on the code snippet you provided, it appears to be a part of a function that is generating code for a target machine. The function is taking an operation and its operands as input, and is using the `Subtarget` object to determine the properties of the target machine. The code is checking if the `Subtarget` has a certain extension (`hasStdExtV`) and if the `IntNo` operand is a constant integer. If these conditions are met, the code is extracting the extended operand from the `IntNo` operand and checking if it is a constant integer. If" LLVM,RISCV,3122,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `unsigned ExtOpc = isa < ConstantSDNode > ( ScalarOp ) ? : ;` This line is checking if the `ScalarOp` is a `ConstantSDNode`, and if so, it sets the `ExtOpc` variable to the value of the `ConstantSDNode`. If `ScalarOp` is not a `ConstantSDNode`, then `ExtOpc` is set to a different value." LLVM,RISCV,3123,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be a call to the `getNode` method of the `DAG` object, with the `ExtOpc` variable as the first argument, and the `Subtarget` object as the second argument. The `ExtOpc` variable is set to the value of the `ExtendOp` variable if the `ScalarOp` variable is a constant, otherwise it is set to the value of the `ExtendOp` variable plus 1. The `Subtarget` object is used to determine the length of the vector operands. The `get" LLVM,RISCV,3124,"The next statement in this code snippet is: case : return LowerINTRINSIC_WO_CHAIN ( Op , DAG ) ; This is a case statement that matches the string literal """". The statement returns the result of the function ""LowerINTRINSIC_WO_CHAIN"" called with the arguments ""Op"" and ""DAG""." LLVM,RISCV,3125,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `Hi = DAG.getNode(, DL, VecVT, Hi, ThirtyTwoV);` This statement is a call to the `getNode` method of the `DAG` object, passing in the string literal ``, the `DL` object, the `VecVT` object, the `Hi` object, and the `ThirtyTwoV` object. The purpose of this statement is to create a new node in the DAG, with the given string literal as the" LLVM,RISCV,3126,"Based on the code snippet provided, it appears to be a part of a function that is performing some kind of operation on a vector of values. The function is using the `SDValue` class to represent the vector and is using the `DAG` class to perform operations on the vector. The code is checking if the vector is a constant and if it is, it is extracting the value of the constant. If the vector is not a constant, it is creating a new vector with the same value as the original vector, but with a different type. It is difficult to predict the next statement of the" LLVM,RISCV,3127,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific input and the behavior of the `ArgVT` and `ArgIdx` objects. However, based on the code provided, it appears that the next statement will be: `return ArgIdx.index();` This is because the code checks if `ArgVT` is a scalable vector and if the vector element type is a simple type (i.e., a string literal), and if both conditions are true, it returns the index of the argument. If either condition is false," LLVM,RISCV,3128,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `MVT ArgVT = ArgIdx.value().VT;` This statement assigns the value of the `VT` member of the `value()` method of the `ArgIdx` object to the `ArgVT` variable." LLVM,RISCV,3129,"Based on the code snippet you provided, it appears to be a part of a function that is computing the number of sign bits in a value. The function takes an operand and a depth as input, and it appears to be using the `DAG` class to compute the number of sign bits. The function is using a switch statement to handle different cases, and it is returning a value based on the input operand and depth. The return value is either a constant or the result of a computation involving the `DAG` class. Without more context, it is difficult to provide a more specific answer" LLVM,RISCV,3130,The next statement after the `if` statement is the `return` statement. The `return` statement will return the result of the expression `Subtarget.hasStdExtZbb() && !isa(Y)`. LLVM,RISCV,3131,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet without knowing the specific implementation of the `TargetLowering` class and the `hasAndNotCompare` method. However, based on the name of the method, it appears to be related to checking if a given value has a specific property or feature. Without more information, it is not possible to provide a definitive answer to this question. If you have any additional context or details about the code snippet, I would be happy to try and assist you further." LLVM,RISCV,3132,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `Instruction * Op = dyn_cast < Instruction > ( OpIdx . value ( ) . get ( ) ) ;` This line of code is casting the operand at index `OpIdx` of instruction `I` to an `Instruction` pointer, and storing the result in the variable `Op`. The `dyn_cast` function is used to perform a dynamic cast, which allows the code to check if the operand is an `Instruction` object before casting it. If the operand is not an `Inst" LLVM,RISCV,3133,"Based on the code snippet provided, it is difficult to predict the next statement with certainty. However, based on the context, it appears that the code is checking whether certain operands of an instruction should be sunk. The code is using the `PatternMatch` namespace from LLVM, which provides a set of functions for matching patterns in LLVM IR. The `shouldSinkOperands` function is checking whether the instruction `I` should have its operands sunk, based on the type of the instruction and the subtarget's capabilities. The function first checks whether the instruction is a vector" LLVM,RISCV,3134,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `isExtInLoc` and `getNode` methods, as well as the values of the variables `VA`, `DL`, and `Value`. However, based on the names of the methods and the context of the code, it is likely that the next statement will be a call to the `getNode` method, passing in the values of `DL`, `VA.getValVT()`, and `Value` as arguments. The `getNode` method is likely to return a" LLVM,RISCV,3135,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `Value = DAG.getNode(, DL, VA.getLocVT(), Value, DAG.getValueType(VA.getValVT()));` This statement is assigning a new value to the `Value` variable, which is a `SDValue` object. The `getNode()` method is being called on the `DAG` object, which is a `SelectionDAG` object. The method is being passed several arguments: * ``: This is a string" LLVM,RISCV,3136,"Based on the code snippet you provided, it appears that the next statement after `case : return emitSelectCC ( MI , MBB ) ;` is `case : case : case : case : return emitCALL ( MI , MBB ) ;`. Therefore, the next statement will be `case : case : case : case :" LLVM,RISCV,3137,"Based on the code snippet you provided, it appears that the `switch` statement is checking the value of `MI.getOpcode()` and returning a value based on the result. The `case` statements are checking for specific values of `MI.getOpcode()` and returning a value if the condition is met. The values being checked are all strings, so it's likely that the `switch` statement is checking the value of a string variable. Without more information about the code, it's difficult to predict exactly what the next statement will be. However, based on the code you provided" LLVM,RISCV,3138,"Based on the code snippet provided, it is difficult to predict the next statement with certainty. However, based on the context and the structure of the code, it is likely that the next statement will be related to the analysis of the function arguments and the assignment of values to registers. The code snippet appears to be part of a function that is analyzing the arguments of a function and assigning values to registers based on the type of the argument and the target architecture. The `CCValAssign` object is being used to represent the assignment of a value to a register, and the `Subtarget` object is being used" LLVM,RISCV,3139,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be: `SDValue NewVASTART = DAG.getVASTART(Chain, Addr, PtrVT, FuncInfo);` This is because the code is trying to lower the `VASTART` instruction, which is a variadic function that takes a chain of arguments and a pointer to the function's arguments. The `DAG.getVASTART` method is used to create a new `VASTART` instruction with the appropriate arguments. The `Chain` and `Addr` operands are likely to be the chain of arguments" LLVM,RISCV,3140,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be the `llvm_unreachable` function call, which is a function that is called when the program reaches an unreachable point. The `llvm_unreachable` function is used to indicate that the program has reached an unreachable point and to terminate the program. The `llvm_unreachable` function is typically used in situations where the program has reached a point where it is not possible to continue executing the program in a meaningful way. For example, if the program has encountered an error that it" LLVM,RISCV,3141,"This code snippet is using the LLVM API to generate machine code for a specific instruction set architecture (ISA). The `CC_` function is a macro that expands to a call to a function that checks whether a certain condition is true for the given instruction set architecture. The `CCValAssign` class is used to assign values to registers or other locations in the machine code. The `CCInfo` class is used to store information about the instruction set architecture and the machine code being generated. The `Outs` array is an array of `CCVal` objects" LLVM,RISCV,3142,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `unsigned Reg = State . AllocateReg ( ArgGPRs ) ;` This line allocates a register from the `ArgGPRs` set, which is a set of available registers. The `AllocateReg` method returns the allocated register, which is assigned to the `Reg` variable." LLVM,RISCV,3143,"The next statement of the code snippet is: `State.addLoc(CCValAssign::getMem(ValNo2, ValVT2, State.AllocateStack(XLenInBytes, XLenInBytes), LocVT2, CCValAssign::Full));` This statement adds a memory location to the `State` object, using the `CCValAssign::getMem` method. The memory location is allocated on the stack using the `State.AllocateStack` method, and the `ValNo2`, `ValVT2`, and `" LLVM,RISCV,3144,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the program depends on the input data and the specific implementation of the `CCValAssign` class. However, based on the syntax and the context of the code snippet, it is likely that the next statement will be a `break` statement, as it is the most common way to exit a `switch` statement in C++. Therefore, the next statement of this code snippet is likely to be: ``` break; ```" LLVM,RISCV,3145,The next statement after the `break` statement is the `case CCValAssign :: BCvt` statement. LLVM,RISCV,3146,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific input and the behavior of the `DAG` object. However, based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the next statement will be: `Val = DAG.getNode(, DL, LocVT, Val);` This statement is likely to be executed because the `case` statement above it is checking for the `CCValAssign` value, and the `break` statement is not executed until the end of the `case` block. Therefore" LLVM,RISCV,3147,The next statement after the `if` block is `return Builder.CreateFence(Ord);`. LLVM,RISCV,3148,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `Result = Builder.CreateCall(MaskedCmpXchg, {AlignedAddr, CmpVal, NewVal, Mask, Ordering});` This statement creates a call to the `MaskedCmpXchg` function, passing in the `AlignedAddr`, `CmpVal`, `NewVal`, `Mask`, and `Ordering` values as arguments. The result of the call is stored in the `Result` variable." LLVM,RISCV,3149,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `Type * Tys[ ] = { AlignedAddr -> getType ( ) } ;` This line declares an array of `Type` objects called `Tys`, and initializes it with the type of `AlignedAddr`. The `->` operator is used to access the `getType()` method of the `AlignedAddr` object." LLVM,RISCV,3150,"The next statement of the code snippet is: `Result = Builder.CreateCall(LrwOpScwLoop, {AlignedAddr, Incr, Mask, SextShamt, Ordering});` This is because the `if` statement checks if the operation is either `Min` or `Max`, and if it is, it sets `SextShamt` to a value based on the width of the value operand and the shift amount. If the operation is not `Min` or `Max`, then the `else` block is executed, which sets `Result`" LLVM,RISCV,3151,"This code snippet is creating a new basic block in a machine function (MF) and adding instructions to it. The instructions are related to loading a value from memory and storing it in a register. The first instruction is creating a new machine memory operand (MMO) using the `getMachineMemOperand` method of the `MachineFunction` class. The method takes several arguments: * The first argument is a `MachinePointerInfo` object, which represents a pointer to a memory location. In this case, it is a fixed stack pointer. * The second argument is a `MachineMemOper" LLVM,RISCV,3152,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return Builder.CreateFence(AtomicOrdering::Acquire);` Explanation: The code snippet is a method named `emitTrailingFence` that is part of a class called `TargetLowering`. The method takes three parameters: an `IRBuilder` object, an `Instruction` object, and an `AtomicOrdering` object. The method first checks if the `Instruction` object is a `LoadInst` and if the `AtomicOrdering` object is `Acquire` or" LLVM,RISCV,3153,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return Builder.CreateFence(AtomicOrdering::Acquire);` This statement creates a fence instruction with the `Acquire` ordering, which ensures that all loads and stores that precede the fence in program order are completed before the fence is executed. The `CreateFence` method is called on the `Builder` object, which is a class that provides a set of methods for creating and manipulating instructions in the LLVM IR. The `AtomicOrdering::Acquire` parameter specifies the ordering of the f" LLVM,RISCV,3154,"The next statement in the code snippet is: case AtomicRMWInst::Xchg: Explanation: The code snippet is a switch statement that is checking the value of the `BinOp` variable and returning a string literal based on the value. The `default` case is `llvm_unreachable`, which means that the code should not be reached. The other cases are for different values of `BinOp`, and they return different string literals. The next statement in the code snippet is the `case` statement for `AtomicRMWInst::" LLVM,RISCV,3155,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `llvm_unreachable();` This is because the `switch` statement is exhaustive, meaning that it covers all possible values of `BinOp`, and the `default` case is unreachable. Therefore, the code will always reach the `llvm_unreachable();` statement." LLVM,RISCV,3156,"Based on the code snippet you provided, it appears that the next statement will be: `return std::make_pair(, &);` This is because the `if` statement checks if the size of the `Constraint` string is equal to ``, and if it is, it will execute the `switch` statement. If the `switch` statement does not find a matching case, it will execute the `default` case, which is to `break` out of the `switch` statement. If the `if` statement" LLVM,RISCV,3157,"Based on the code snippet you provided, it appears that the next statement will be: `return std::make_pair(, &);` This is because the `if` statement checks if the size of the `Constraint` string is equal to ``, and if it is, it returns a pair consisting of `` and the address of the `` string. If the size of the `Constraint` string is not equal to ``, then the `default` case" LLVM,RISCV,3158,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return VT.changeVectorElementTypeToInteger();` This is because the `if` statement checks if `VT` is a vector, and if it is not, it returns `getPointerTy(DL)`. However, since `VT` is a vector, the `if` statement is not executed, and the function returns `VT.changeVectorElementTypeToInteger()`." LLVM,RISCV,3159,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return DL.getTypeSizeInBits(VT) > DL.getTypeSizeInBits(EVT::getSetCCResultType(DL, LLVMContext, VT));` This statement is checking if the size of the `VT` type is greater than the size of the `EVT::getSetCCResultType(DL, LLVMContext, VT)` type. If the condition is true, the function returns the size of the `VT` type, otherwise it returns the size of the `" LLVM,RISCV,3160,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return ;` This is because the `break` statement is used to exit the `switch` block, and the `case` statement is used to specify the value to be matched. The `return` statement is used to return a value from a function. In this case, the `return` statement is used to return a string literal." LLVM,RISCV,3161,"It's difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific values of the string literals and the return values of the functions. However, based on the pattern of the code, it appears that the next statement will be another `case` statement with a string literal and a return statement with a string literal." LLVM,RISCV,3162,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific input and the behavior of the `cast` function. However, based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the next statement will be a call to the `getArgOperand` method of the `I` object, passing in the value `` as an argument. This will retrieve the operand at the specified index from the `I` object, which is assumed to be a sequence of operands. The type of the operand will then be cast to a `PointerType` using" LLVM,RISCV,3163,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `if (IsCallerStructRet && IsCalleeStructRet) return false;` This is because the previous `if` statement checks if the caller and callee functions have the `sret` attribute, and if they do, it returns `false`. The next `if` statement checks if the caller function has the `sret` attribute and the callee function does not have the `sret` attribute, and if that is the case, it returns `false`. Therefore, the next statement after the previous `if` statement is to check" LLVM,RISCV,3164,"Based on the code snippet provided, it is difficult to predict the next statement with certainty. However, we can make an educated guess based on the information provided. The `isLegalAddressingMode` function appears to be checking whether a given addressing mode is legal for a particular target architecture. The function takes several parameters, including a `DataLayout` object, an `AddrMode` object, a `Type` pointer, an unsigned integer, and an `Instruction` pointer. The function first checks whether the `BaseGV` field of the `AddrMode` object is non-" LLVM,RISCV,3165,The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be a closing brace `}` to complete the `isLegalICmpImmediate` function. LLVM,RISCV,3166,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return Subtarget.is64Bit() && SrcVT == && DstVT == ;` This statement is a return statement that returns a boolean value indicating whether the extension from the source type to the destination type is cheaper than the extension from the source type to the destination type. The `Subtarget.is64Bit()` method is called to check if the subtarget is 64-bit, and the `SrcVT` and `DstVT`" LLVM,RISCV,3167,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet without knowing the specific implementation of the `TargetLowering` class and the `isSExtCheaperThanZExt` method. However, based on the name of the method, it appears to be checking whether a sign-extension (SExt) is cheaper than a zero-extension (ZExt) for a given source and destination vector types. Here are a few possibilities for the next statement: 1. `return SrcVT.isSigned() && DstVT.isSigned();` * This statement" LLVM,RISCV,3168,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return (SrcBits == && DestBits == );` This statement is reached if the `if` condition is not satisfied, meaning that the `Subtarget` is not 64-bit, the `SrcVT` is not a vector, the `DstVT` is not a vector, and both `SrcVT` and `DstVT` are integers. In this case, the function returns `true` if the size of the source and" LLVM,RISCV,3169,"The next statement in this code snippet is: case Instruction::SDiv: This is because the `getOpcode()` method returns the opcode of the instruction, and the `case` statement is checking for the opcode of the `SDiv` instruction." LLVM,RISCV,3170,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the code depends on the specific values of the string literals and the context in which the code is executed. However, based on the syntax of the code, it appears to be a series of case labels for a switch statement, where each case label is associated with a specific string literal. The next statement after the last case label would be the statement that is executed if none of the case labels match the value of the switch expression." LLVM,RISCV,3171,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return false;` Explanation: The `isZExtFree` function checks if a load operation can be performed without zero-extension. The function takes two arguments: `Val`, which is the value to be loaded, and `VT2`, which is the target vector type. The function first checks if the value to be loaded is a `LoadSDNode`. If it is not, the function returns `false`. If the value to be loaded is a `LoadSDNode`, the function checks the memory type of the" LLVM,RISCV,3172,"The next statement of this code snippet is: SDValue MNLo = SDValue(DAG.getMachineNode(, DL, Ty, BALo), );" LLVM,RISCV,3173,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `InVals.push_back(ArgValue);` This statement adds the `ArgValue` to the `InVals` vector." LLVM,RISCV,3174,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `InVals.push_back(DAG.getLoad(VA.getValVT(), DL, Chain, ArgValue, MachinePointerInfo()));` This statement is adding a new element to the `InVals` vector, which is a vector of `SDValue` objects. The `SDValue` object is created by calling the `getLoad` method of the `DAG` object, which is a `DataLayout` object. The `getLoad` method creates a new `SDValue` object that represents a load" LLVM,RISCV,3175,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific values of the variables and the behavior of the functions being called. However, based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the next statement will be: `FrameAddr = DAG.getLoad(VT, DL, DAG.getEntryNode(), Ptr, MachinePointerInfo());` This statement is loading a value from memory at the address pointed to by `Ptr`, which is a pointer to a location in the stack frame. The value being loaded is of type `V" LLVM,RISCV,3176,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet without knowing the specific implementation of the `MachineFrameInfo` and `RegisterInfo` classes, as well as the values of the constants `NUM_LIT` and `XLenInBytes`. However, based on the names of the variables and methods used, it appears that the code is working with information about a machine frame and its registers, and is trying to retrieve the address of a frame register and the depth of a stack frame. Based on this information, it is possible that the next statement of the code snippet could be something like: ```" LLVM,RISCV,3177,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be: `SDValue MNLo = SDValue(DAG.getMachineNode(, DL, Ty, MNHi, GALo), );` This statement is creating a new `SDValue` object named `MNLo` and initializing it with the result of a call to `DAG.getMachineNode()`. The arguments passed to `getMachineNode()` are: * ``: A string literal representing the name of the machine node." LLVM,RISCV,3178,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet without knowing the specific values of the variables and the implementation of the functions being called. However, based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the next statement will be a return statement, as the code is checking if the `Offset` variable is not equal to a specific value, and if it is not, it will return a value. The `DAG` object is being used to create nodes and get values, and the `DL` object is being used to get the machine node. The `Ty` variable is being used to specify the type of" LLVM,RISCV,3179,"Based on the code snippet you provided, it seems that the `switch` statement is checking the result of `Op.getOpcode()` and returning a value based on the opcode. The next statement in the code snippet is `return lowerVASTART(Op, DAG);`. This statement will be executed if the opcode returned by `Op.getOpcode()` is equal to ``. Therefore, the next statement of this code snippet will be `return lowerVASTART(Op, DAG);`." LLVM,RISCV,3180,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `SDValue FrameAddr = lowerFRAMEADDR(Op, DAG);` This line of code is calling the `lowerFRAMEADDR` function, which is a function that is defined in the `llvm` library. The `lowerFRAMEADDR` function is used to lower the `FRAMEADDR` instruction, which is used to get the address of the current stack frame. The `FrameAddr` variable is being assigned the result of this function call, which is a `SDValue` object that" LLVM,RISCV,3181,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `unsigned Reg = MF.addLiveIn(RI.getRARegister(), getRegClassFor(XLenVT));` This statement adds a live-in register to the function, which is used to store the return address of the function. The register is added to the function using the `addLiveIn` method of the `MachineFunction` class, and the register class is obtained using the `getRegClassFor` method. The register class is used to determine the type of the register, which is necessary for the `addLive" LLVM,RISCV,3182,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be: `SDValue Result = DAG.getNode(ISD::SETCC, DL, VTs, LHS, RHS, TargetCC);` This statement creates a new SDNode of type `ISD::SETCC` (a conditional set instruction) with the given operands `LHS`, `RHS`, and `TargetCC`. The `DAG` object is used to create the node, and the `VTs` list is used to specify the types of the operands. The `ISD::SET" LLVM,RISCV,3183,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return DAG.getStore(Op.getOperand(), DL, FI, Op.getOperand(), MachinePointerInfo(SV));` This statement is a call to the `getStore` method of the `DAG` object, which is a class that represents a directed acyclic graph (DAG) of values. The `getStore` method creates a new store operation in the DAG, which is used to store a value in memory. The" LLVM,RISCV,3184,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `FuncInfo->setVAStart(Op.getOperand(0));` This is because the `lowerVASTART` method is responsible for lowering the `VASTART` instruction, which is used to start a variable argument list. The `setVAStart` method is used to set the starting address of the variable argument list, which is passed as an operand to the `VASTART` instruction." LLVM,RISCV,3185,"The next statement after the `switch` statement is `CC = ( CC ) ;`, which assigns the result of the `` function to the `CC` variable." LLVM,RISCV,3186,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be a case statement, as the code snippet appears to be part of a switch statement. The next case statement is likely to be `case :`, as the code snippet ends with a `break` statement, which is used to exit the current case and move on to the next one." LLVM,RISCV,3187,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `shouldConvertConstantLoadToIntImm` function and the values of the `Imm` and `Ty` parameters. However, based on the name of the function and the types of the parameters, it is likely that the next statement will involve checking whether the constant load can be converted to an integer immediate value of the specified type." LLVM,RISCV,3188,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return true;` This statement is the last statement in the `shouldConvertConstantLoadToIntImm` function, and it returns a boolean value indicating whether the constant load should be converted to an integer immediate. In this case, the function always returns `true`, which means that the constant load will always be converted to an integer immediate." LLVM,RISCV,3189,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return AtomicExpansionKind::MaskedIntrinsic;`" LLVM,RISCV,3190,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet without knowing the specific implementation of the `TargetLowering` class and the `shouldExpandAtomicCmpXchgInIR` method. However, based on the name of the method, it is likely that the next statement will be a check to determine whether the atomic compare-and-exchange instruction should be expanded in the intermediate representation (IR) of the target machine. Here are a few possible next statements: 1. `if (CI->getParent()->getParent()->getParent()->getISA() == ISA_LIT" LLVM,RISCV,3191,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the code depends on the values of the variables `Size` and ``. However, based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the function is checking if the `Size` variable is equal to one of two specific values, and if so, it is returning a value of type `AtomicExpansionKind`." LLVM,RISCV,3192,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be: Hi = DAG.getCopyFromReg(Chain, DL, LoVReg, ); This is because the code is checking if the location is a register location (VA.isRegLoc()) and if it is, it is creating a virtual register (LoVReg) and adding it to the list of live-in registers. It is then using the DAG.getCopyFromReg() function to create a copy of the register value into the virtual register. The next statement is likely to be the creation" LLVM,RISCV,3193,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the code depends on the specific values of the variables and the implementation of the functions being called. However, based on the names of the variables and the functions being called, it appears that the code is working with information about a machine frame and is trying to determine the type of a value. The `MachineFrameInfo` class appears to be a class that represents information about a machine frame, and the `getFrameInfo` method is likely a method that returns a `MachineFrameInfo` object representing the current frame." LLVM,RISCV,3194,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific input and the behavior of the `llvm_unreachable` function. However, based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the next statement after the `default` case will be the `case CCValAssign::Full` statement. This is because the `default` case is only executed if the value of the `CCValAssign` enum is not equal to `Full` or `Indirect`, and the `case CCValAssign::Full` statement is executed if the value of" LLVM,RISCV,3195,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the `computeTables()` function is not specified. However, based on the name of the function, it is likely that it will perform some computation on tables, such as updating or modifying the contents of tables." LLVM,RISCV,3196,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet without knowing the context and the implementation of the `getLegacyLegalizerInfo` and `computeTables` methods. However, based on the syntax and the naming conventions, it is likely that the next statement after the call to `computeTables` would be a statement that uses the result of the `computeTables` method. For example, the next statement could be a call to a method that takes the result of `computeTables` as an argument, such as: ``` getLegacyLegalizerInfo().computeTables().getLeg" LLVM,RISCV,3197,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be the initialization of the `LegalizerInfo` object with the `Subtarget` object passed as an argument. Here's a breakdown of the code snippet: * `ISA_LIT` is a macro that expands to a string literal containing the name of the instruction set architecture (ISA) being targeted. * `LegalizerInfo` is a class that represents information about the legalization of instructions for a particular ISA. * `Subtarget` is a class that represents a subtarget (a specific instance" LLVM,RISCV,3198,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return CalleeSavedStackSize;` This statement returns the value of the `CalleeSavedStackSize` field, which is an unsigned integer representing the size of the stack frame for the callee (i.e., the function being called)." LLVM,RISCV,3199,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the `getRVVPadding` function is not specified. However, based on the name of the function and the fact that it is declared as a `const` member function, it is likely that it returns a value that is related to the padding of the `RVVPadding` structure. Without more information about the context in which this code snippet is used, it is not possible to provide a more specific answer." LLVM,RISCV,3200,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of the code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the program depends on the specific inputs and state of the system. However, based on the code snippet provided, it is likely that the next statement will be: `return RVVPadding;` This is because the `getRVVPadding()` function is defined to return the value of the `RVVPadding` member variable, which is a `uint64_t` type. The function does not appear to modify the value of `RVVPadding` in any way, so it" LLVM,RISCV,3201,The next statement after `return RVVStackAlign` would be the end of the function. LLVM,RISCV,3202,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the code depends on the specific implementation of the `getRVVStackSize` method and the state of the object that it is called on. However, based on the name of the method and the return type, it is likely that the method returns the size of a stack or queue that is used to store return values. The `const` keyword at the end of the method signature suggests that the method does not modify the state of the object, and that it is a ""pure"" function that only depends" LLVM,RISCV,3203,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `mapping` function and the data being processed. However, based on the code snippet provided, it is likely that the next statement will be a call to the `mapping` function with the `IO` and `MachineFunctionInfo` objects as arguments. Here is an example of what the next statement might look like: ``` mapping(IO, MFI); ``` This statement would call the `mapping` function with the `IO` and `MachineFunctionInfo` objects as arguments" LLVM,RISCV,3204,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `CalleeSavedStackSize = Size;` This statement assigns the value of `Size` to the variable `CalleeSavedStackSize`." LLVM,RISCV,3205,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the `setRVVStackAlign` function depends on the specific implementation of the `Align` class and the `StackAlign` parameter passed to the function. However, based on the name of the function and the parameter, it is likely that the function is setting the stack alignment for the RVV (RISC-V Vector Extension) to the value specified by the `StackAlign` parameter. The `Align` class is likely used to represent the alignment of the stack" LLVM,RISCV,3206,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the code depends on the value of `Size` and the specific implementation of the `RVVStackSize` property. However, based on the name of the property and the fact that it is being assigned a value, it is likely that the next statement will be a call to a method or function that uses the value of `RVVStackSize` to perform some operation. Without more information about the context in which this code is being used, it is not possible to provide a more specific" LLVM,RISCV,3207,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be a return statement, as the function is checking various conditions and returning a boolean value based on those conditions. The function is checking the following conditions: 1. Whether the subtarget has the `enableSaveRestore` attribute enabled. 2. Whether the `VarArgsSaveSize` is equal to a specific value. 3. Whether the function has a tail call. 4. Whether the function has a specific attribute. If all of these conditions are true, the function will return `true`, otherwise it will return `false`." LLVM,RISCV,3208,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return MF.getSubtargetSubtarget>().enableSaveRestore() && VarArgsSaveSize == NUM_LIT && !MF.getFrameInfo().hasTailCall();` This statement is a boolean expression that evaluates to true if the following conditions are met: 1. The subtarget's `enableSaveRestore` method returns true. 2. The `VarArgsSaveSize` variable is equal to the value of the `NUM_LIT` literal. 3." LLVM,RISCV,3209,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the program depends on the specific implementation of the `useSaveRestoreLibCalls` function and the state of the object on which it is called. However, based on the name of the function, it is likely that the next statement will be a call to a library function that saves or restores the state of the object. The `useSaveRestoreLibCalls` function is likely to be a wrapper around these library functions, and the next statement will likely be a call to one of these functions." LLVM,RISCV,3210,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `EhDataRegFI[I] = MF.getFrameInfo()->CreateStackObject(RC->getSize(), RC->getAlignment(), false);` This statement creates a stack object for the current frame, using the size and alignment of the register class `RC`. The stack object is stored in the `EhDataRegFI` array at index `I`." LLVM,RISCV,3211,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `MF` and `RC` classes, as well as the context in which this code is being executed. However, based on the syntax and the names of the variables and methods used, it appears that this code is creating a new stack object using the `CreateStackObject` method of the `MF` class. The `CreateStackObject` method takes three arguments: the size of the stack object, the alignment of the stack object, and a boolean value indicating whether the stack object" LLVM,RISCV,3212,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return LibCallStackSize;`" LLVM,RISCV,3213,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return LibCallStackSize;`" LLVM,RISCV,3214,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the code depends on the specific inputs and the implementation of the `MachineFunction` class. However, based on the name of the function and the fact that it is returning an integer, it is likely that the next statement of the code will be a return statement that returns the index of the move frame. Here is an example of what the next statement of the code might look like: ``` return moveFrameIndex; ``` This would return the index of the move frame, which is the value" LLVM,RISCV,3215,"The next statement after the code snippet you provided is: `return CallsEhReturn && ( FI == EhDataRegFI [ ] || FI == EhDataRegFI [ ] ) ;` This statement is a return statement that returns the result of the logical AND operation between `CallsEhReturn` and the result of the logical OR operation between `FI == EhDataRegFI [ ]` and `FI == EhDataRegFI [ ]`." LLVM,RISCV,3216,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet without knowing the context and the implementation of the `Res` and `HwlpBasicBlocks` objects. However, based on the syntax and the fact that the `end()` method is being called on `HwlpBasicBlocks`, it is likely that the next statement will be a comparison or assignment operation involving the result of the `end()` method and some other value." LLVM,RISCV,3217,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet without knowing the context and the implementation of the `Res` and `HwlpBasicBlocks` objects. However, based on the syntax and the fact that the `end()` method is being called on `HwlpBasicBlocks`, it is likely that the next statement will be a comparison or assignment operation involving the result of the `end()` method and some other value." LLVM,RISCV,3218,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the program depends on the specific implementation of the `HwlpBasicBlocks` class and the input data. However, based on the name of the method and the fact that it is inserting a new element into a collection, it is likely that the next statement will be related to the insertion of the new element into the collection. Some possible next statements could be: * `HwlpBasicBlocks.insert(BB)`: This would insert the new element `BB` into the collection of" LLVM,RISCV,3219,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be the initialization of the `MachineFunctionInfo` object with the `MachineFunction` object passed as an argument. Here is the predicted next statement: ``` MachineFunctionInfo(MF); ``` This statement initializes the `MachineFunctionInfo` object with the `MachineFunction` object `MF`, which is passed as an argument to the constructor. The `MachineFunctionInfo` object is then ready to be used to store information about the machine function." LLVM,RISCV,3220,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be the initialization of the `MachineFunctionInfo` object with the `MachineFunction` object passed as an argument. Here is the predicted next statement: ``` MachineFunctionInfo(MF); ``` This statement initializes the `MachineFunctionInfo` object with the `MachineFunction` object `MF`, which is passed as an argument to the constructor. The `MachineFunctionInfo` object is then ready to be used to store information about the machine function." LLVM,RISCV,3221,"The next statement of this code snippet is: LibCallStackSize = Size;" LLVM,RISCV,3222,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet without knowing the context and the values of the variables used in the code. However, based on the syntax and the operators used, it appears that the code is checking whether certain conditions are met before performing some action. The code first retrieves a subtarget from the `MF` object using the `getSubtarget` method, and then calls the `enableSaveRestore` method on the subtarget. It then checks whether the `VarArgsSaveSize` variable is equal to a specific value, and whether the `MF` object's `" LLVM,RISCV,3223,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `CallsEhReturn` function and the context in which it is called. However, based on the name of the function, it is likely that the next statement after the `return` statement will be the one that is executed after the `CallsEhReturn` function returns." LLVM,RISCV,3224,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the program depends on the specific implementation of the `getManipulatesSP` method. However, based on the name of the method and the fact that it is declared as a `const` method, it is likely that the method returns a boolean value indicating whether the object manipulates the stack pointer or not." LLVM,RISCV,3225,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the program depends on the specific inputs and the implementation of the `ManipulatesSP` function. However, based on the name of the function, it is likely that the next statement will be a call to the `ManipulatesSP` function, which will manipulate the stack pointer (SP) in some way." LLVM,RISCV,3226,"The next statement after `return SavedGPRFrameSize;` would be the end of the function, as the `return` statement is the last statement in the function." LLVM,RISCV,3227,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `getVarArgsFirstFPR` function and the values of the variables involved. However, based on the code snippet provided, it is likely that the next statement will be the return statement, which will return the value of the `VarArgsFirstFPR` variable." LLVM,RISCV,3228,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return VarArgsFirstGPR + 1;`" LLVM,RISCV,3229,The next statement after `return VarArgsFrameIndex;` would be the end of the function. LLVM,RISCV,3230,"The next statement after `return HasByvalArg` would be the statement that follows the `HasByvalArg` function call. Since the function call is the last statement in the code snippet, there is no next statement." LLVM,RISCV,3231,"The next statement after `return HasByvalArg` would be the statement that follows the `HasByvalArg` function call. Since the function call is the last statement in the code snippet, there is no next statement." LLVM,RISCV,3232,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `SavedGPRFrameSize = 0;` Explanation: The `FunctionInfo` constructor is initializing the `SavedGPRFrameSize` member variable to 0. This is done by assigning the value 0 to the `SavedGPRFrameSize` variable, which is a member of the `FunctionInfo` class. The `SavedGPRFrameSize` variable is used to store the size of the saved GPR frame, which is a part of the function's stack frame. The value 0 indicates" LLVM,RISCV,3233,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `SavedGPRFrameSize = 0;` Explanation: The `FunctionInfo` constructor is initializing the `SavedGPRFrameSize` member variable to 0. This is done by assigning the value 0 to the `SavedGPRFrameSize` variable, which is a member of the `FunctionInfo` class. The `SavedGPRFrameSize` variable is used to store the size of the saved GPR frame, which is a part of the function's stack frame. The value 0 indicates" LLVM,RISCV,3234,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the code depends on the specific inputs and environment in which it is executed. However, based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the variable `CallsEhReturn` is being assigned the value of the `ceret` function. It is not possible to determine the specific behavior of the `ceret` function without more information about the code and its context." LLVM,RISCV,3235,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the code depends on the specific inputs and environment in which it is executed. However, based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the variable `CallsEhReturn` is being assigned the value of the `ceret` function. It is not possible to determine the specific behavior of the `ceret` function without more information about the code and its context." LLVM,RISCV,3236,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `setFormalArgInfo` function and the values of the `Size` and `HasByval` parameters. However, based on the name of the function and the types of the parameters, it is likely that the function is used to set the formal argument information for a function or method, and the `Size` parameter is used to specify the size of the formal argument list, while the `HasByval` parameter is used to indicate whether the function has a by-value parameter" LLVM,RISCV,3237,"The next statement of this code snippet is: HighSavedGPR = Reg;" LLVM,RISCV,3238,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the code depends on the specific values of the variables and the state of the system at the time of execution. However, based on the code snippet provided, it is possible to make some educated guesses about the next statement that might be executed. The `setLowSavedGPR` function takes an `unsigned Reg` parameter, which is likely to be a register number. The function then sets the value of the `lowSavedGPR` variable to the value of the register specified by the" LLVM,RISCV,3239,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the code depends on the specific inputs and the implementation of the `setManipulatesSP` method. However, based on the name of the method and the parameter it takes, it is likely that the method sets a flag indicating whether the object manipulates the stack pointer (SP) register." LLVM,RISCV,3240,"The next statement of this code snippet is: RegSaveFrameIndex = FI;" LLVM,RISCV,3241,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the code depends on the specific inputs and the implementation of the `setSavedGPRFrameSize` function. However, based on the name of the function and the parameter it takes, it is likely that the function sets the size of a saved GPR frame in memory. The `bytes` parameter is likely the size of the frame in bytes. Without knowing the specific implementation of the function, it is not possible to predict the exact behavior of the code. However, it is likely that the function" LLVM,RISCV,3242,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the value of `bytes` is not specified. However, based on the context, it is likely that the next statement will be an assignment to a variable or a function call that uses the value of `SavedGPRFrameSize`." LLVM,RISCV,3243,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the code depends on the specific values of the variables and the implementation of the functions called. However, based on the name of the function and the parameters it takes, it is likely that the function is intended to set the value of a variable that is passed as an argument to the function. The `FPR` parameter is likely a pointer to a floating-point register, and the function is setting the value of the register to the value of the `FPR` parameter. Without more information about the" LLVM,RISCV,3244,"The next statement of this code snippet is: VarArgsFirstFPR = FPR ;" LLVM,RISCV,3245,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be the initialization of the `MachineFunction` object `MF` with the appropriate values. The `MachineFunction` object is a key component of the LLVM IR, and it represents a single machine function (i.e., a function that has been compiled to machine code). The `MachineFunctionInfo` constructor takes a reference to a `MachineFunction` object as its parameter, and it is responsible for initializing the `MachineFunction` object with the appropriate values. The constructor is likely to set the `MachineFunction` object's `Name` field to" LLVM,RISCV,3246,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be the initialization of the `MachineFunction` object `MF` with the appropriate values. The `MachineFunction` object is a key component of the LLVM IR, and it represents a single machine function (i.e., a function that has been compiled to machine code). The `MachineFunctionInfo` constructor takes a reference to a `MachineFunction` object as its parameter, and it is responsible for initializing the `MachineFunction` object with the appropriate values. The constructor is likely to set the `MachineFunction` object's `Name` field to" LLVM,RISCV,3247,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the code depends on the values of the variables and the implementation of the `getFrameInfo()` and `CreateStackObject()` methods. However, based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the `MoveF64FrameIndex` variable is being assigned a value based on the result of the `getFrameInfo()` method, which is called on the `MF` object. The `CreateStackObject()` method is then called on the result of `getFrameInfo()`, passing in two literal values and the" LLVM,RISCV,3248,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the code depends on the values of the variables and the implementation of the `getFrameInfo()` and `CreateStackObject()` methods. However, based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the `MoveF64FrameIndex` variable is being assigned a value based on the result of the `getFrameInfo()` method, which is called on the `MF` object. The `CreateStackObject()` method is then called on the result of `getFrameInfo()`, passing in two literal values and the" LLVM,RISCV,3249,The next statement after `return VarArgsFrameIndex;` would be the end of the function. LLVM,RISCV,3250,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the program depends on the specific values of the variables and the implementation of the `YamlMFI` class. However, based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the `VarArgsFrameIndex` variable is being assigned the value of the `VarArgsFrameIndex` property of the `YamlMFI` object. The `VarArgsFrameIndex` property is likely a method that returns an integer value representing the index of the variable argument frame in the method's argument list. Therefore" LLVM,RISCV,3251,"The next statement in the code snippet is: `VarArgsFrameIndex = YamlMFI.VarArgsFrameIndex;` This statement assigns the value of `YamlMFI.VarArgsFrameIndex` to the variable `VarArgsFrameIndex`." LLVM,RISCV,3252,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the code depends on the specific inputs and the implementation of the `MachineFunction` class. However, based on the name of the class and the constructor signature, it is likely that the next statement will be a call to the `MachineFunction` constructor, which will initialize the `MachineFunction` object. Here is an example of what the next statement might look like: ``` MachineFunction(MF); ``` This statement will create a new `MachineFunction` object and pass it the `" LLVM,RISCV,3253,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the code depends on the specific inputs and the implementation of the `MachineFunction` class. However, based on the name of the class and the constructor signature, it is likely that the next statement will be a call to the `MachineFunction` constructor, which will initialize the `MachineFunction` object. Here is an example of what the next statement might look like: ``` MachineFunction(MF); ``` This statement will create a new `MachineFunction` object and pass it the `" LLVM,RISCV,3254,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the code depends on the value of the `Index` variable and the specific implementation of the `VarArgsFrameIndex` function. However, based on the name of the function and the fact that it is being assigned to a variable, it is likely that the next statement will be a call to the `VarArgsFrameIndex` function with the `Index` variable as an argument. For example: ``` VarArgsFrameIndex = Index ; VarArgsFrameIndex(Index) ; ```" LLVM,RISCV,3255,"The next statement of this code snippet is: return VarArgsSaveSize;" LLVM,RISCV,3256,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the code depends on the specific values of the variables and the context in which the code is executed. However, based on the information provided, it is likely that the next statement after `VarArgsSaveSize = Size;` would be a statement that uses the value of `VarArgsSaveSize` to perform some operation. Without more information about the code, it is not possible to provide a more specific prediction." LLVM,RISCV,3257,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `RCToScavenge = & ;` This is because the `if` statement that precedes it is checking whether the `RegImm.Reg` is contained in the `STR_LIT` string, and if it is, it sets `RCToScavenge` to the address of the `STR_LIT` string. If the `if` statement is false, then the `else if` statement is executed, which also sets `RCToScavenge` to the address of the `STR_" LLVM,RISCV,3258,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the `compressedLDSTOffsetMask` function is not specified. However, based on the name of the function and the fact that it takes an `unsigned Opcode` parameter, it is likely that the function is used to generate a mask for a compressed load or store instruction. In this case, the next statement of the code snippet is likely to be a call to the `compressedLDSTOffsetMask` function, passing in the `Opcode` parameter, and storing the result in a variable or" LLVM,RISCV,3259,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the `compressedLDSTOffsetMask` function is not specified. However, based on the name of the function and the fact that it takes an `unsigned Opcode` parameter, it is likely that the function is used to generate a mask for a compressed load or store instruction. In this case, the next statement of the code snippet is likely to be a call to the `compressedLDSTOffsetMask` function, passing in the `Opcode` parameter, and storing the result in a variable or" LLVM,RISCV,3260,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return new MakeCompressibleOpt ( ) ;` This statement creates a new instance of the `MakeCompressibleOpt` class and returns it as the result of the `createMakeCompressibleOptPass` function." LLVM,RISCV,3261,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the `getBaseAdjustForCompression` function depends on the specific values of the `Offset` and `Opcode` parameters, as well as the implementation of the function itself. However, based on the name of the function and the parameters it takes, it is likely that the function is used to calculate a base address adjustment for compression. The `Offset` parameter is likely to be the offset of the data to be compressed, and the `Opcode` parameter is likely to be the opcode" LLVM,RISCV,3262,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the `getBaseAdjustForCompression` function depends on the specific values of the `Offset` and `Opcode` parameters, as well as the implementation of the function itself. However, based on the name of the function and the parameters it takes, it is likely that the function is used to calculate a base address adjustment for compression. The `Offset` parameter is likely to be the offset of the data to be compressed, and the `Opcode` parameter is likely to be the opcode" LLVM,RISCV,3263,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the value of `_COMPRESS_INSTRS_NAME` is not known. However, based on the context of the code snippet, it appears to be a macro that expands to a string literal representing the name of a compression instruction set. Therefore, the next statement of this code snippet is likely to be a call to the `compress` function, passing the `ISA_LIT` macro as an argument. The `compress` function will then use the value of" Compiler Type,Target,Idx,Des LLVM,RISCV,3264,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific values of the variables and the behavior of the functions called. However, based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the next statement will be: `if (isCompressibleStore(MI)) {` This is because the code checks if the instruction is a compressible store using the `isCompressibleStore` function, and if it is, it enters the `if` block to perform additional checks and potentially return a `RegImmPair`." LLVM,RISCV,3265,"The next statement of the code snippet is: `if ( ! MOImm . isImm ( ) ) return RegImmPair ( , ) ;` This statement checks if the immediate operand is not an immediate value, and if it is not, it returns a `RegImmPair` with the string literal `` and the numeric literal ``." LLVM,RISCV,3266,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the `isCompressedReg` function is not specified. However, based on the name of the function and the fact that it takes a `Register` parameter, it is likely that the function returns a boolean value indicating whether the register is compressed or not." LLVM,RISCV,3267,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the `isCompressedReg` function is not specified. However, based on the name of the function and the fact that it takes a `Register` parameter, it is likely that the function returns a boolean value indicating whether the register is compressed or not." LLVM,RISCV,3268,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the program depends on the specific values of the variables and the implementation of the `getOpcode()` method. However, based on the information provided, it is likely that the next statement will be a conditional statement that checks the value of `Opcode` and performs a specific action based on its value. The `getOpcode()` method is likely to return a value that represents the opcode of the instruction being executed, and the conditional statement will check the value of `Opcode` to determine the appropriate action to" LLVM,RISCV,3269,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `getMF` and `getSubtarget` methods, as well as the value of the `MI` object. However, based on the names of the methods and the types of the variables, it is likely that the next statement will be a call to a method on the `STI` object, such as `STI.getOpcode()` or `STI.getSubtarget()`. The `STI` object is a reference to a subtarget, and the `get" LLVM,RISCV,3270,"The next statement of this code snippet is: return Opcode == || ( ! STI . is64Bit ( ) && Opcode == ) || Opcode == || Opcode == ;" LLVM,RISCV,3271,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific values of the string literals and the integer literal. However, based on the syntax and the fact that the code is inside a `switch` statement, it is likely that the next statement will be a `break` statement or a `return` statement." LLVM,RISCV,3272,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `MakeCompressibleOpt` function and the `MachineFunctionPass` class. However, based on the name of the function and the fact that it is a member of the `MachineFunctionPass` class, it is likely that the next statement will be related to the optimization of the machine code generated by the compiler. Some possible next statements could include: * Calling other functions or methods to perform specific optimization tasks, such as loop unrolling or instruction reordering. *" LLVM,RISCV,3273,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet without knowing the context and the purpose of the code. However, based on the code snippet provided, it appears to be part of a function that is analyzing and optimizing the use of registers in a machine instruction. The code snippet is using a `SmallVector` to store a list of machine instructions, and it is iterating over the instructions in the vector. It is also using a `Register` object to represent a register in the machine instruction, and it is using a `RegImm` object to represent a register and an immediate value." LLVM,RISCV,3274,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific values of the variables and the behavior of the functions being called. However, based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the next statement will be: `MOImm.setImm(NewOffset);` This is because the previous statement, `MOImm.getImm()`, is used to retrieve the immediate value of the operand, and the result of this operation is then used to set the immediate value of the operand to a new value. The new value is calculated by applying" LLVM,RISCV,3275,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific values of the `Opc` and `Imm` parameters. However, based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the next statement will be the initialization of the `Opc` and `Imm` members of the `Inst` class with the values passed as arguments to the constructor." LLVM,RISCV,3276,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific values of the `Opc` and `Imm` parameters. However, based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the next statement will be the initialization of the `Opc` and `Imm` members of the `Inst` class with the values passed as arguments to the constructor." LLVM,RISCV,3277,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `Res.push_back(Inst(, Lo12));` This statement adds an instruction to the `Res` vector, where the instruction is represented by the `Inst` class, and the first argument is a string literal representing the instruction name, and the second argument is the value of `Lo12`." LLVM,RISCV,3278,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `Res.push_back(Inst(, ShiftAmount));` This statement adds an instruction to the `Res` vector, where the instruction is represented by the `Inst` class, and the first argument is a string literal representing the instruction opcode, and the second argument is the shift amount. The shift amount is calculated earlier in the code snippet as the number of bits to shift the high 52 bits of the value to the right, in order to extract the low 12 bits of the value." LLVM,RISCV,3279,"The next statement of the code snippet is: `TmpSeq.push_back( (, ));` This statement adds a new element to the `TmpSeq` vector, which is a string literal followed by a number literal. The string literal is enclosed in angle brackets (`<>`), which indicates that it is a placeholder for a value that will be substituted at runtime. The number literal is also enclosed in angle brackets, which indicates that it is a placeholder for a value that will be substit" LLVM,RISCV,3280,"This code snippet appears to be part of a function that is generating assembly code for a RISC-V processor. The function takes a value `Val` as input and generates assembly code to load the value into a register. The first `if` statement checks if the value `Val` is an integer less than a certain value (represented by ``). If it is, the function generates assembly code to load the value into a register using the `addi` instruction. The `addi` instruction takes two operands: the first is the register to load the value into," LLVM,RISCV,3281,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `Res.push_back( (, ShiftAmount));` This statement adds a new element to the `Res` vector, which is a string literal that represents the instruction sequence for the given value `Val`. The `ShiftAmount` parameter is used to determine the number of bits to shift the value left by, and the resulting instruction sequence is stored in the `TmpSeq` vector. If the size of the `TmpSeq` vector is less than the size of the `Res` vector" LLVM,RISCV,3282,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it appears to be a fragment of a larger program and the context is not provided. However, based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the next statement will be a call to the `generateInstSeqImpl` function, which is not defined in the code snippet. The `generateInstSeqImpl` function is likely to be a recursive function that generates a sequence of instructions based on the input value `Val` and the `IsRV64` flag. The function takes two arguments: `Val` and `IsR" LLVM,RISCV,3283,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be: Res.push_back(Lo12); Explanation: The code snippet is part of a function that is processing a 64-bit integer value, `Val`. The function is checking if `Val` is an integer, and if it is, it is extracting the high 20 bits of `Val` and the low 12 bits of `Val`. If the high 20 bits are non-zero, the function is pushing the high 20 bits onto a vector called `Res`. If" LLVM,RISCV,3284,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet without knowing the specific implementation of the `generateInstSeq` function and the values of the variables `Val`, `ShiftVal`, `PlatRegSize`, and `IsRV64`. However, based on the names of the variables and the functions being called, it appears that the code is generating a sequence of instructions for a register-based architecture. The `ashr` function is likely performing an arithmetic right shift operation on the `Val` variable, and the `sextOrTrunc` function is likely sign-extending or truncating" LLVM,RISCV,3285,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the code depends on the values of the variables `ShiftVal`, `Size`, and `PlatRegSize`, which are not provided. However, based on the information given, we can make some assumptions about the behavior of the code. The `for` loop will iterate over the values of `ShiftVal` from `` to `Size`, with a step size of `PlatRegSize`. The loop will terminate when `ShiftVal` is greater than or equal to `Size`." LLVM,RISCV,3286,"The next statement of the code snippet is: `Res = TmpSeq;` This is because the `if` statement that follows the `push_back` method call checks whether the size of `TmpSeq` is less than or equal to the size of `Res`. If it is, then `Res` is assigned the value of `TmpSeq`." LLVM,RISCV,3287,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific values of the variables and the behavior of the functions being called. However, based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the next statement will be: `Res.push_back((, Hi20));` This is because the previous statement, `if (Hi20) Res.push_back((, Hi20));`, checks whether `Hi20` is non" LLVM,RISCV,3288,"Based on the code snippet you provided, it appears to be a part of a switch statement in C++. The next statement after the code snippet you provided would be the default case, which is not explicitly specified in the code snippet. Therefore, the next statement would be the default case, which would execute if none of the other cases match. The default case would set `Compressed` to `false`. So, the next statement of the code snippet you provided would be: ``` Compressed = false; ```" LLVM,RISCV,3289,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be a call to the `generateInstSeq` function, passing in the `Hi52` variable as the first argument, the `IsRV64` variable as the second argument, and the `Res` variable as the third argument. The `generateInstSeq` function is not defined in the code snippet you provided, so it is not possible to determine exactly what it does or what its return value will be. However, based on the name of the function and the variables it takes as arguments, it is likely that it generates a sequence of instructions based" LLVM,RISCV,3290,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `Res.push_back(Inst(, ShiftAmount));` This statement adds an instruction to the `Res` vector, where the instruction is represented by the `Inst` class, and the instruction opcode is a string literal that is not specified in the code snippet. The `ShiftAmount` variable is also used as an argument to the `Inst` constructor, which is not specified in the code snippet." LLVM,RISCV,3291,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `generateInstSeq` function and the values of the variables `Chunk`, `IsRV64`, and `MatSeq`. However, based on the context of the code, it is likely that the next statement will be a call to the `generateInstSeq` function with the same arguments as the previous call, but with a different value for the `MatSeq` parameter. This is because the `MatSeq` parameter is being updated with the size of the `MatSeq` object," LLVM,RISCV,3292,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `MatSeq.push_back(Chunk);`" LLVM,RISCV,3293,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return - UpperTrailingOnes;` This statement is executed if the following conditions are true: * `UpperTrailingOnes` is less than `` * The sum of `UpperTrailingOnes` and `LowerLeadingOnes` is greater than `` minus `` In this case, the function returns the difference between `` and `UpperTrailingOnes`." LLVM,RISCV,3294,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `unsigned UpperTrailingOnes = countTrailingOnes ( Hi_32 ( Val ) ) ;` This line of code calculates the number of trailing ones in the high 32 bits of the input value `Val`. The `countTrailingOnes` function is called with the high 32 bits of `Val` as its argument, and the result is stored in the `UpperTrailingOnes` variable." LLVM,RISCV,3295,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be: `if ( Res . size ( ) > && ActiveFeatures [ ] ) {` This is because the previous `if` statement has an `else` clause that is executed if `Res . size ( ) <= `. Since the `else` clause does not contain a `return` statement, the next statement to be executed is the next `if` statement in the code." LLVM,RISCV,3296,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `if (isUInt(Hi52) && !isInt(Hi52) && ActiveFeatures[STR_LIT]) {` This is because the previous `if` statement has an `else` clause that is executed if `ShiftAmount` is not greater than `` or if `isInt(Hi52)` is true. Since we have already determined that `ShiftAmount` is greater than `` and `" LLVM,RISCV,3297,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `Cost += ;` This is because the `if` statement that follows the `switch` statement is not executed, so the `Cost` variable is not modified. The `switch` statement sets the `Compressed` variable to `true` or `false` based on the value of `Instr.Opc`, but the `if` statement that follows the `switch` statement only executes if `Compressed` is `false`. Since `Compressed` is set to `true` in the `switch` statement, the" LLVM,RISCV,3298,"The next statement after the `switch` statement is `if ( ! Compressed ) Cost += ; else Cost += ;`. The `switch` statement is checking the value of `Instr.Imm` and setting the `Compressed` variable to `true` or `false` based on the value. The `if` statement is then checking the value of `Compressed` and adding a different cost to the `Cost` variable based on its value." LLVM,RISCV,3299,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `TmpSeq.push_back((Opc, Bit + ));` This statement adds a new element to the `TmpSeq` vector, which is a string literal representing an instruction. The instruction is constructed using the `Opc` and `Bit` variables, which are both integers. The `Opc` variable represents the opcode of the instruction, and the `Bit` variable represents the bit position of the instruction. The `+ ` part of the instruction" LLVM,RISCV,3300,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `int64_t Lo12 = SignExtend64 < > ( Val ) ;` This statement is assigning the value of `Val` to `Lo12`, but with the sign extended to 64 bits. The `SignExtend64` function is used to perform the sign extension. The `` placeholder is used to represent a numerical literal value, which is not specified in the code snippet provided." LLVM,RISCV,3301,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `if ( Res . size ( ) > && ActiveFeatures [ ] ) {` This is a conditional statement that checks if the size of the `Res` vector is greater than a certain value (represented by ``) and if the `ActiveFeatures` map contains a specific key (represented by ``). If both conditions are true, the code inside the `if` block will be executed." LLVM,RISCV,3302,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific values of the variables and the behavior of the functions being called. However, based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the next statement will be: `if (isUInt < > (Val) && !isInt < > (Val) && ActiveFeatures[]) {` This statement checks if the value of `Val` is an unsigned integer, and if it is not an integer, and" LLVM,RISCV,3303,"Based on the code snippet you provided, it appears to be a part of a function that is checking if a certain instruction is compressed or not. The function is checking the `Opc` field of each instruction in the `Res` vector and setting the `Compressed` flag to `true` if the instruction is compressed. The next statement of the code snippet you provided is: ``` case : case : case : Compressed = isInt < > ( Instr . Imm" LLVM,RISCV,3304,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `Div = ;` This is a variable declaration and initialization statement, where `Div` is a variable of type `int64_t` and is being assigned the value of ``." LLVM,RISCV,3305,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific values of the variables and the behavior of the functions being called. However, based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the next statement will be: `Res.push_back((, Lo12));` This is because the previous statement, `if (Lo12 || Hi20 == )`, has been evaluated as true, and the code inside the `if` block is being executed. The `" LLVM,RISCV,3306,"Based on the code snippet you provided, it appears to be a loop that is iterating over a collection of instructions (represented by the variable `Instr`) and performing different actions based on the value of the `Opc` field of each instruction. The `switch` statement is used to determine which action to take based on the value of `Opc`. The `default` case is reached if the value of `Opc` does not match any of the other cases. In this case, the function `llvm_unreachable` is called, which is a function that is not intended" LLVM,RISCV,3307,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `Cost += getInstSeqCost(MatSeq, HasRVC);` This line adds the cost of the current instruction sequence `MatSeq` to the total cost `Cost`. The `getInstSeqCost` function is called with the current instruction sequence and the `HasRVC` flag to determine the cost of the sequence. The `HasRVC` flag is used to indicate whether the current instruction sequence has the RVC (RISC-V Compressed) instruction set enabled." LLVM,RISCV,3308,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific values of the variables and the behavior of the functions called. However, based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the next statement will be: `Cost += getInstSeqCost(MatSeq, HasRVC);` This statement is likely to be executed after the `for` loop, as it is the last statement in the loop body. The `Cost` variable is incremented by the cost of the instruction sequence generated by `generateInstSeq` for the current chunk of the value being processed" LLVM,RISCV,3309,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `if (Kind < FirstTargetFixupKind) return MCAsmBackend::getFixupKindInfo(Kind);` Explanation: The code snippet is a part of a function that is applying a fixup to a piece of data. The function first checks if the fixup kind is one of the target-specific fixup kinds, and if so, it returns the fixup kind information for that kind. If the fixup kind is not target-specific, the function applies the fixup using the `MCAsmBack" LLVM,RISCV,3310,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be: `Res.setOpcode(Opcode);` This is because the `relaxInstruction` method is responsible for relaxing the instruction, which means modifying its opcode to a more relaxed version. The `getRelaxedOpcode` method is used to retrieve the relaxed opcode for the instruction, and the `setOpcode` method is used to set the opcode of the `Res` instruction to the relaxed opcode." LLVM,RISCV,3311,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `MCAsmBackend * backend = llvm::createMCAsmBackend(T, MRI, TT, CPU);` This statement creates a new `MCAsmBackend` object using the `llvm::create` function, which is a template function that takes a type parameter `ISA_LIT` and returns a pointer to a `MCAsmBackend` object. The `T`, `MRI`, `TT`, and `CPU` parameters are passed to the `ll" LLVM,RISCV,3312,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `const static MCFixupKindInfo Infos [ ] = { { , , , MCFixupKindInfo :: FKF_IsPCRel } , { , , , MCFixupKindInfo :: FKF_IsPCRel } , { , , " LLVM,RISCV,3313,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the `extractBitsForFixup` function is not specified. However, based on the name of the function and the fact that it is being called with the result of `Fixup.getKind()`, it is likely that the function is extracting some bits from the `Value` variable based on the kind of fixup being performed. Without more information about the `extractBitsForFixup` function and the context in which it is being called, it is not possible to provide a" LLVM,RISCV,3314,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return (int16_t)Value != (int64_t)Value;` This statement is a return statement that returns a boolean value indicating whether the fixup needs relaxation. The return value is calculated by comparing the extracted bits for the fixup (which is stored in the `Value` variable) to the original value of the fixup (which is stored in the `Value` variable). If the extracted bits are not equal to the original value, then the fixup needs relaxation, and the function returns `true`. Otherwise, the" LLVM,RISCV,3315,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `Inst` class and the `setOpcode` method. However, based on the code snippet provided, it is likely that the next statement will be an assignment statement that sets the `Opcode` property of the `Res` object to the value of the `Opcode` variable. Here is an example of what the next statement might look like: ``` Res.setOpcode(Opcode); ``` This statement would set the `Opcode` property of the `" LLVM,RISCV,3316,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be the initialization of the `OSABI` member variable of the `ISA_LIT` class, which is being passed as an argument to the constructor. Therefore, the next statement of this code snippet is likely to be: ``` OSABI = osABI; ```" LLVM,RISCV,3317,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be the initialization of the `OSABI` member variable of the `ISA_LIT` class, which is being passed as an argument to the constructor. Therefore, the next statement of this code snippet is likely to be: ``` OSABI = osABI; ```" LLVM,RISCV,3318,"The next statement of this code snippet is: OW->write8(0);" LLVM,RISCV,3319,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be a call to the `CreateComment` method, passing in the `CommentString` variable as an argument. The method will create a new comment in the code with the specified string value." LLVM,RISCV,3320,"The next statement in the code snippet is: `return MCAsmInfo :: getExprForFDESymbol ( Sym , Encoding , Streamer ) ;` This statement returns the result of the `getExprForFDESymbol` method, which is a `const MCExpr *` object. The method is called with the same arguments as the previous call, but with the `Encoding` parameter modified to include the `dwarf::DW_EH_PE_pcrel` flag. This flag indicates that the symbol should be encoded as a PC-relative value." LLVM,RISCV,3321,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it appears to be a fragment of a larger program and the context is not provided. However, based on the syntax and the variables used, it appears to be related to the configuration of a compiler or assembler. The variables `CodePointerSize`, `CalleeSaveStackSlotSize`, `CommentString`, `AlignmentIsInBytes`, `SupportsDebugInformation`, `ExceptionsType`, `Data16bitsDirective`, and `Data32bitsDirective` are likely to be related to the configuration of the" LLVM,RISCV,3322,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the code and the data being processed. However, based on the information provided, it is likely that the next statement will be related to the handling of exceptions or the processing of data. One possible next statement could be: ExceptionsType = ExceptionHandling :: DwarfCFI ; This statement sets the exception handling type to DwarfCFI, which is a common format for exception handling information in object files. Another possible next statement could be:" LLVM,RISCV,3323,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the code depends on various factors such as the input data, the specific implementation of the `MCAsmInfo` class, and the environment in which the code is executed. However, based on the name of the function `anchor`, it is likely that the next statement will be related to the creation or manipulation of an anchor or a reference point in the code. This could involve setting up a pointer or a reference to a specific location in memory, or it could involve creating a new anchor or reference point in the" LLVM,RISCV,3324,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the code depends on various factors such as the input data, the specific implementation of the `MCAsmInfo` class, and the environment in which the code is executed. However, based on the name of the function `anchor`, it is likely that the next statement will be related to the creation or manipulation of an anchor or a reference point in the code. This could involve setting up a pointer or a reference to a specific location in memory, or it could involve creating a new anchor or reference point in the" LLVM,RISCV,3325,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `CalleeSaveStackSlotSize = TT.isArch64Bit() ? : ;` This statement sets the `CalleeSaveStackSlotSize` variable to the value of `TT.isArch64Bit()` if the architecture is 64-bit, or to the value of `` if the architecture is not 64-bit. The value of `` is not specified in the code snippet, so it could" LLVM,RISCV,3326,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it appears to be a fragment of a larger program and the context is not provided. However, based on the syntax and the variables used, it appears that the code is defining some constants and variables related to the architecture and data types of the program. The first line sets the `CodePointerSize` variable to either 4 or 8, depending on whether the architecture is 32-bit or 64-bit, respectively. The `CalleeSaveStackSlotSize` variable is also set to either 4" LLVM,RISCV,3327,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the language and the values of the variables involved. However, based on the syntax and the context of the code, it is likely that the next statement will be a comparison or assignment operation involving the `IsCheriPurecapABI` variable. Here are a few possible next statements: * `IsCheriPurecapABI = ABI != && ( ABI ) ;` * `IsCheriP" LLVM,RISCV,3328,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be the initialization of the `PointerSize` and `CalleeSaveStackSlotSize` members of the `MCAsmInfo` class. The values of these members are determined by the `isArch64Bit()` method of the `Triple` class, which returns a boolean value indicating whether the target architecture is 64-bit or not. If the target architecture is 64-bit, the `PointerSize` and `CalleeSaveStackSlotSize` members are set to 8 and 16, respectively. Otherwise," LLVM,RISCV,3329,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `MCAsmInfo::MCAsmInfo(const Triple &TT) : MCAsmInfo(TT) {}` This is a constructor for the `MCAsmInfo` class, which takes a `const Triple &` as an argument. The constructor initializes the `MCAsmInfo` object with the given `Triple` and sets the `MCAsmInfo` object's `TT` field to the given `Triple`." LLVM,RISCV,3330,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `CalleeSaveStackSlotSize = TT.isArch64Bit() ? : ;` This statement sets the `CalleeSaveStackSlotSize` variable to the value of `TT.isArch64Bit()` if the architecture is 64-bit, or to the value of `` if the architecture is not 64-bit. The value of `` is not specified in the code snippet, so it could" LLVM,RISCV,3331,"The next statement in this code snippet is: `Data64bitsDirective = ;` This statement sets the `Data64bitsDirective` variable to the string literal ``." LLVM,RISCV,3332,"Based on the code snippet provided, it appears to be generating machine code for a specific instruction set architecture (ISA). The code is using a library or framework to generate the machine code, and it is using a specific syntax and conventions for the ISA. The code is creating a new instruction, `TmpInst`, and setting its opcode to the value of the `MI` object's `getOpcode()` method. It is also adding a register operand to the instruction, which is obtained from the `getReg()` method of the `MI` object. The code is then adding" LLVM,RISCV,3333,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `Fixups.push_back(MCFixup::create(, Expr, MCFixupKind(FixupKind), MI.getLoc()));` This statement is adding a new fixup to the `Fixups` vector, using the `MCFixup::create` method to create a new fixup object. The fixup is created with the given `Expr` expression, the `FixupKind` kind, and the location of the machine instruction `MI`. The `M" LLVM,RISCV,3334,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `Fixups.push_back(MCFixup::create(, Expr, MCFixupKind(FixupKind), MI.getLoc()));` This statement is adding a new fixup to the `Fixups` vector, using the `MCFixup::create` method to create a new fixup object. The fixup is created with the following parameters: * ``: The offset of the fixup in the instruction. * `Expr`:" LLVM,RISCV,3335,"Based on the code snippet you provided, it appears to be a part of a function that is generating machine code for a specific instruction set architecture (ISA). The function is checking the opcode of the instruction and expanding it if necessary, and then writing the binary code for the instruction to a file. The next statement of the code snippet you provided is: `case : { uint16_t Bits = getBinaryCodeForInstr(MI, Fixups, STI); :: write < uint16_t > (OS" LLVM,RISCV,3336,"Based on the code snippet provided, it is difficult to predict the next statement with certainty. However, based on the context and the structure of the code, it is likely that the next statement will be another `case` statement or a `break` statement. The code appears to be part of a switch statement that is handling different cases for a machine instruction. The `case` statements are checking the number of operands in the instruction and the `break` statements are used to exit the switch statement. The `if` statements are checking the specific operands and their values in the instruction. Therefore," LLVM,RISCV,3337,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `MCNumEmitted += ;` This is because the code is currently inside the `switch` statement, and the next case to be executed is the one with the label `case :`. This case is executed when the value of `Size` is equal to ``." LLVM,RISCV,3338,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be a call to the `MCFixup::create` method, which creates a new `MCFixup` object with the specified properties. The method takes several arguments, including the offset of the fixup, the expression to be evaluated, the fixup kind, and the location of the fixup in the source code. In this case, the offset of the fixup is specified as ``, which is a placeholder for a numerical literal. The expression to be evaluated is `Expr`, which is a `MCExpr` object that" LLVM,RISCV,3339,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it appears to be part of a larger program and the context is not provided. However, based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the next statement may be related to the creation of a fixup object. The code snippet defines a function that takes an expression `Expr` and a string `Str` as input. The function asserts that the expression is of a specific kind and has a specific value. If the assertion is true, the function creates a fixup object and adds it to a list of fixups. The" LLVM,RISCV,3340,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific values of the variables and the behavior of the functions being called. However, based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the next statement will be a call to the `getOperand` function, possibly with the argument ``." LLVM,RISCV,3341,"Based on the code snippet you provided, it appears to be a part of a function that determines the fixup kind for a given expression. The function takes an expression `Expr` and a descriptor `Desc` as input, and it uses a series of `if` statements to determine the fixup kind based on the expression's kind and the descriptor's opcode. The function first checks if the expression is a symbol reference, and if so, it checks the kind of the symbol reference. If the symbol reference is of kind `VK_None`, the function checks the descriptor's" LLVM,RISCV,3342,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be: ` :: write ( OS , Binary , ) ;` This is because the previous statement is an `assert` statement, which checks that the `Func` variable is an expression and has a specific string literal value. If the assertion fails, the program will terminate with an error message. If the assertion succeeds, the next statement will be executed, which is the `write` method call on the `` object." LLVM,RISCV,3343,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `switch (Size) {` This is because the code checks the value of `Size` and then branches to the appropriate case statement based on its value." LLVM,RISCV,3344,"Based on the code snippet you provided, it appears to be a part of a function that is responsible for emitting machine code for a specific instruction. The function takes in several parameters, including a `MCInst` object, an output stream, a list of fixups, and a `SubtargetInfo` object. The function first checks the opcode of the instruction and expands it if it is a string literal. It then switches on the size of the instruction and emits the appropriate machine code for each case. Based on this information, it is difficult to predict the next statement of the code" LLVM,RISCV,3345,"Based on the code snippet provided, it is difficult to predict the next statement with certainty. However, based on the context and the information provided, it is likely that the next statement will be related to the expansion of the function call. The code snippet appears to be part of a function that is responsible for expanding a function call instruction. The function takes in a machine instruction (MI) and a raw output stream (OS), and it uses the subtarget information (STI) to generate the expanded code for the function call. The function first checks the opcode of the machine instruction to determine the type" LLVM,RISCV,3346,"The next statement after the code snippet you provided is likely to be a method call or a constructor invocation, as the code is returning a new instance of a class. Based on the syntax and the naming conventions used in the code snippet, it is likely that the next statement will be a call to the constructor of the `MCCodeEmitter` class, passing in the `Ctx` and `MCII` objects as arguments. Therefore, the next statement is likely to be: ``` return new MCCodeEmitter(Ctx, MCII); ```" LLVM,RISCV,3347,"Based on the code snippet provided, it is difficult to predict the next statement with certainty. However, based on the context of the code, it appears that the next statement is likely to be a case statement or a switch statement that handles different sizes of instructions. The code is emitting instructions to a stream, and the size of the instruction is determined by the `getSize()` method of the `MCInstrDesc` object. The `getSize()` method returns the size of the instruction in bytes, and the code is handling different sizes of instructions in the switch statement. Therefore, the next statement is likely" LLVM,RISCV,3348,"The next statement in the code snippet is: uint16_t Bits = getBinaryCodeForInstr(MI, Fixups, STI); This is because the code is currently in the `default` case of the `switch` statement, and the next statement is the initialization of the `Bits` variable." LLVM,RISCV,3349,"This code snippet appears to be part of a disassembler or assembler for a specific instruction set architecture (ISA). The code is using the LLVM library to manipulate machine code instructions. The code is creating a new fixup object and pushing it onto a vector of fixups. The fixup object is created using the `MCFixup::create` method, which takes several parameters: * The first parameter is the offset of the fixup within the instruction. * The second parameter is an expression that represents the value to be fixed up. In this case, the expression is obtained from" LLVM,RISCV,3350,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific values of the variables and the implementation of the `MCOperand` and `MCExpr` classes. However, based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the next statement is likely to be a call to the `MCOperand::isReg()` method, which checks whether the operand is a register. Here is a possible next statement: ``` if (DestReg.isReg() && SrcReg.isReg() && TPReg.isReg()) {" LLVM,RISCV,3351,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be: ` :: write ( OS , Binary , ) ;` This is because the previous statement is an `assert` statement, which checks that the `Func` variable is an expression and has a specific string literal value. If the assertion fails, the program will terminate with an error message. If the assertion succeeds, the next statement will be executed, which is the `write` method call on the `` object." LLVM,RISCV,3352,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific values of the variables and the behavior of the functions called. However, based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the next statement will be: TmpInst = MCInstBuilder() This is because the previous statement ends with a semicolon, indicating that it is a complete statement, and the next statement begins with the keyword ""TmpInst"", which is the name of a variable that is being assigned a value." LLVM,RISCV,3353,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific inputs and the behavior of the functions called. However, based on the context, it appears that the code is handling different cases for the kind of expression and the fixup kind. The switch statement checks the kind of expression and sets the fixup kind accordingly. The cases for the fixup kind are: * VK_None: No fixup. * VK_Invalid: Invalid fixup. * VK_32_PCREL: 32-bit PC-" LLVM,RISCV,3354,"The code snippet is a C++ function that takes a `MO` object as an argument and performs a switch statement based on the value returned by `MO.getReg()`. The function asserts that `MO.isReg()` returns true and that the string literal `` is not empty. Based on the information provided, it is not possible to predict the next statement of the code snippet with certainty. However, we can make an educated guess based on the information provided. The next statement of the code snippet is likely to be a case statement within the switch statement. The switch" LLVM,RISCV,3355,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `MCNumEmitted++;`" LLVM,RISCV,3356,"The next statement after the given code snippet is likely to be: `OS.write(Bits);` This is because the code snippet is using the `Writer` class to write the binary code for the instruction to the output stream `OS`. The `write` method of the `Writer` class takes a single argument, which is the binary code to be written. In this case, the binary code is stored in the `Bits` variable, which is obtained by calling the `getBinaryCodeForInstr` function." LLVM,RISCV,3357,"Based on the code snippet provided, it is difficult to predict the next statement with certainty. However, we can make an educated guess based on the context and the patterns we see in the code. The code appears to be dealing with the creation of a fixup for a memory operand. The fixup kind is determined by the expression kind of the memory operand, which can be either a symbol reference or a target expression. The code checks the expression kind and then performs different actions based on the result. Based on the patterns we see in the code, it is likely that the next statement will be" LLVM,RISCV,3358,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the implementation of the `MCCodeEmitter` class and the specific context in which it is being used. However, based on the name of the class and the constructor parameter, it is likely that the next statement will be related to code emission or the initialization of the `MCCodeEmitter` object." LLVM,RISCV,3359,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the implementation of the `MCCodeEmitter` class and the specific context in which it is being used. However, based on the name of the class and the constructor parameter, it is likely that the next statement will be related to code emission or the initialization of the `MCCodeEmitter` object." LLVM,RISCV,3360,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `++MCNumEmitted;`" LLVM,RISCV,3361,"Based on the code snippet provided, it is difficult to predict the next statement with certainty. However, we can make some observations and inferences based on the information provided. The code snippet appears to be part of a function that is handling different cases based on the value of the `Kind` variable. The `Kind` variable is an enumeration that represents different types of expressions, and the function is handling each type of expression differently. The first case in the code snippet is handling the `MCExpr::SymbolRef` type of expression, and it is checking the value of the `getKind()` method of" LLVM,RISCV,3362,"Based on the code snippet provided, it is difficult to predict the next statement with certainty. However, we can make an educated guess based on the patterns and conventions used in the code. The code appears to be part of a function that is expanding a machine instruction. The function takes several parameters, including a `MI` object, an `OS` object, a `Fixups` object, and a `STI` object. The function first retrieves the size of the instruction using the `getSize` method of the `Desc` object. It then checks the opcode of the instruction using" LLVM,RISCV,3363,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `case : {` This is a `case` statement in a `switch` block, where `` is a placeholder for a specific integer value. The statement is executed if the value of the `Size` variable is equal to ``." LLVM,RISCV,3364,"Based on the code snippet provided, it is difficult to predict the next statement with certainty. However, based on the context and the information provided, it is likely that the next statement will be a case statement that handles the different types of fixups. The code snippet appears to be a part of a function that generates machine code for a specific instruction set architecture (ISA). The function takes as input a machine instruction (MCInst) and an operand number (OpNo), and it returns an immediate operand value. The function also takes a SmallVectorImpl of MCFixup, which is a vector of" LLVM,RISCV,3365,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty because it depends on the specific values of the variables and the behavior of the functions called. However, based on the context, it appears that the code is handling different cases for a switch statement, and the next statement is likely to be another case or the default case. The code is checking the value of the `Kind` variable and the `getKind()` method of an object, and setting the `FixupKind` variable accordingly. It is also setting the `RelaxCandidate` variable to `true` in some cases" LLVM,RISCV,3366,"Based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the next statement will be: case MCExpr :: VK__CALL_PLT : FixupKind = ; RelaxCandidate = true ; break ;" LLVM,RISCV,3367,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `Fixups.push_back(MCFixup::create(, Expr, MCFixupKind(FixupKind), MI.getLoc()));` This statement is adding a new fixup to the `Fixups` vector, using the `MCFixup::create` method to create a new fixup object. The fixup is created with the following parameters: * `Num`: The number of the fixup, which is specified by the `` placeholder" LLVM,RISCV,3368,"Based on the code snippet provided, it appears to be a part of a function that is generating fixups for a machine instruction. The function is checking the type of the operand and the type of the expression to determine the type of fixup to generate. The next statement of the code snippet is likely to be a call to the `MCFixup::create` function to create a new fixup object with the appropriate type and expression. The function will also push the new fixup object onto a list of fixups for the instruction, and increment a counter to keep track of the number of fixups generated." LLVM,RISCV,3369,"The next statement of this code snippet is: ` :: write ( OS , Binary , ) ;` This is a method call to the `write` method of the `` class, passing in the `OS`, `Binary`, and `` variables as arguments. The `write` method is not defined in the code snippet, so it is not possible to determine what it does or what it returns." LLVM,RISCV,3370,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific values of the variables and the behavior of the functions called. However, based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the next statement will be: TmpInst = MCInstBuilder() .addReg() .addReg(Ra) .addImm(); This is because the code snippet is setting up a call to the function ""MCInstBuilder"" with the arguments "", Expr, MCFixupKind(FixupKind), MI.getLoc()));` This statement adds a new fixup to the `Fixups` vector, which is a list of fixups that need to be applied to the machine code. The fixup is created using the `MCFixup::create` method, which takes the following arguments: * The offset of the fixup in the machine code *" LLVM,RISCV,3372,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `Fixups.push_back(MCFixup::create(, Dummy, MCFixupKind(), MI.getLoc()));` This statement creates a new `MCFixup` object and adds it to the `Fixups` vector. The `MCFixup` object is created with the following arguments: * ``: The offset of the fixup. * `Dummy`: A dummy `MCConstantExpr" LLVM,RISCV,3373,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `Fixups.push_back(MCFixup::create(, Expr, MCFixupKind(FixupKind), MI.getLoc()));` This statement adds a new fixup to the `Fixups` vector, which is a vector of `MCFixup` objects. The fixup is created using the `MCFixup::create` method, which takes four arguments: * The offset of the fixup within the instruction. * The expression that the fix" LLVM,RISCV,3374,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return new MCCodeEmitter(MCII, MRI, Ctx);`" LLVM,RISCV,3375,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return new MCCodeEmitter(MCII, MRI, Ctx);`" LLVM,RISCV,3376,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be: `ShiftValue = (ShiftValue << I) & (Size - 1);` This is because the code is using a bitwise left shift operation to shift the bits of `ShiftValue` by `I` positions, and then applying a bitwise AND operation to the result with `Size - 1`. The purpose of this operation is likely to be to compute the value of `ShiftValue` for the current iteration of the loop, based on the previous value of `ShiftValue` and the current value of `I`." LLVM,RISCV,3377,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be: `return MO . getImm ( ) << ;` This is because the code checks if the operand is an immediate value using the `isImm()` method, and if it is, it returns the immediate value shifted left by `` bits. If the operand is not an immediate value, the code creates a fixup using the `create()` method of the `MCFixup` class, which is a subclass of `MCExpr`. The `create()` method takes three" LLVM,RISCV,3378,"The code snippet is a part of a function that appears to be generating machine code for a specific instruction. The function takes an operand number as input and returns a value that is either an immediate value or a fixup value. The first part of the code snippet checks if the operand is an immediate value using the `isImm()` method. If it is, the function returns the immediate value shifted left by a certain number of bits (represented by ``). The second part of the code snippet creates a fixup value using the `MCFixup::create" LLVM,RISCV,3379,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `getCallEncoding` function and the values of the input parameters. However, based on the name of the function and the parameters, it is likely that the function is responsible for encoding a call instruction, and the next statement is likely to be related to the encoding of the call instruction. Some possible next statements could include: * Encoding the opcode of the call instruction: `Fixups.push_back(MCFixup::Create(0, MI." LLVM,RISCV,3380,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return MO.getImm() << ;` This statement is executed if the `MO` operand is an immediate value (i.e., `MO.isImm()` returns `true`). It returns the immediate value shifted left by `NUM_LIT` bits." LLVM,RISCV,3381,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `getJumpTargetEncoding` function and the values of the input parameters. However, based on the name of the function and the parameters, it is likely that the next statement will be related to encoding the jump target operand of the instruction. Here are some possible next statements: 1. `unsigned jumpTarget = MO.getImm();` This statement would extract the immediate value of the jump target operand from the instruction. 2. `unsigned jumpTarget = MO." LLVM,RISCV,3382,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific values of the variables and the behavior of the functions called. However, based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the next statement will be: `return static_cast < unsigned > ( MO . getImm ( ) ) ;` This is because the first `if` statement checks if `MO` is a register, and if it is, it returns the encoding value of the register. If `MO` is not a register, then the second `if` statement checks if it is" LLVM,RISCV,3383,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `if (MO.isImm()) return MO.getImm();`" LLVM,RISCV,3384,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `MO` class and the value of the `NUM_LIT` constant. However, based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the `MO` class has a method called `isImm` that returns a boolean value indicating whether the object is an immediate value, and a method called `getImm` that returns the immediate value. If the `isImm` method returns `true`, then the code snippet will return the result of shifting the immediate value to the" LLVM,RISCV,3385,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `MO` class and the value of the `NUM_LIT` constant. However, based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the `MO` class has a method called `isImm` that returns a boolean value indicating whether the object is an immediate value, and a method called `getImm` that returns the immediate value. If the `isImm` method returns `true`, then the code snippet will return the result of shifting the immediate value to the" LLVM,RISCV,3386,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be: `if (MO.isImm()) {` This is because the `getPCImmEncoding` function is checking if the operand at index `OpNum` is an immediate value, and if so, it will return the encoding for that immediate value. The `if` statement checks if the operand is an immediate value by calling the `isImm` method on the `MCOperand` object. If the operand is an immediate value, the `if` statement will be executed, and the function will return the" LLVM,RISCV,3387,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return Expr->evaluateAsConstant();`. This is because the `MO` object is an instance of the `MCExpr` class, and the `getExpr()` method returns a pointer to the `MCExpr` object. The `evaluateAsConstant()` method is called on the `Expr` object to evaluate it as a constant expression." LLVM,RISCV,3388,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return Expr->evaluateAsConstant();`. This is because the `MO` object is an instance of the `MCExpr` class, and the `getExpr()` method returns a pointer to the `MCExpr` object. The `evaluateAsConstant()` method is called on the `Expr` object to evaluate it as a constant expression." LLVM,RISCV,3389,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the code depends on the specific implementation of the `MCCodeEmitter` class and the values of the `mcii` and `ctx` parameters. However, based on the name of the class and the parameters passed to the constructor, it is likely that the next statement will be an initialization of the `MCCodeEmitter` object, possibly setting up some internal state or registering the object with the `ctx` object." LLVM,RISCV,3390,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the code depends on the specific implementation of the `MCCodeEmitter` class and the values of the `mcii` and `ctx` parameters. However, based on the name of the class and the parameters passed to the constructor, it is likely that the next statement will be an initialization of the `MCCodeEmitter` object, possibly setting up some internal state or registering the object with the `ctx` object." LLVM,RISCV,3391,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `MCCodeEmitter` class and the input data it is processing. However, based on the name of the class and the fact that it is an emitter, it is likely that the next statement will be related to emitting code or data. The `MCCodeEmitter` class may be responsible for generating machine code or data that is used by the processor to execute instructions or perform other operations. Without more information about the specific implementation of the `MCCode" LLVM,RISCV,3392,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `MCCodeEmitter` class and the input data it is processing. However, based on the name of the class and the fact that it is an emitter, it is likely that the next statement will be related to emitting code or data. The `MCCodeEmitter` class may be responsible for generating machine code or data that is used by the processor to execute instructions or perform other operations. Without more information about the specific implementation of the `MCCode" LLVM,RISCV,3393,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `switch (Size) {` This is because the `if` statement checks if the opcode is ``, and if it is, it calls the `expandAddTPRel` function and returns. If the opcode is not ``, then the code proceeds to the `switch` statement, which checks the value of `Size` and performs different actions based on its value." LLVM,RISCV,3394,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific values of the variables and the behavior of the functions called. However, based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the next statement will be: TmpInst = MCInstBuilder() .addReg() .addReg(Ra) .addImm(); This is because the code snippet is setting up a call to the function ""MCInstBuilder"" with the arguments "", Expr, MCFixupKind(FixupKind), MI.getLoc()));` This statement adds a new fixup to the `Fixups` vector, using the `MCFixup::create` method to create a new fixup object. The fixup is created with the following parameters: * `NUM_LIT`: The number of the fixup, which is a constant value. * `Expr" LLVM,RISCV,3397,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it appears to be part of a larger program and the context is not provided. However, based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the next statement may be related to writing the binary code for the instruction to an output stream. The code snippet creates an instance of the `MCInstBuilder` class and adds registers and operands to it, and then calls the `getBinaryCodeForInstr` function to retrieve the binary code for the instruction. The binary code is then written to an output stream using the `write` function." LLVM,RISCV,3398,"Based on the code snippet you provided, it appears that the next statement will be a call to the `llvm_unreachable` function, which is a function that is called when the program reaches an unexpected or unrecoverable state. The `llvm_unreachable` function is typically used to indicate that a particular branch of code is not supposed to be reached, and it is often used in conjunction with the `assert` function to check for unexpected conditions. In this case, the `assert` function is being used to check that the `FixupKind` variable is not" LLVM,RISCV,3399,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return new MCCodeEmitter(Ctx, MCII);` This statement creates a new instance of the `MCCodeEmitter` class for the specified instruction set architecture (ISA) and returns a pointer to it. The `MCCodeEmitter` class is responsible for generating machine code for the specified ISA. The `MCInstrInfo` and `MCRegisterInfo` objects are used to provide information about the instructions and registers for the ISA. The `MCContext` object is used to" LLVM,RISCV,3400,"Based on the code snippet you provided, it appears to be part of a function that is generating machine code for an instruction. The function takes a `Size` parameter, which is used to determine the size of the instruction, and a `MI` parameter, which is used to get the binary code for the instruction. The function then writes the binary code for the instruction to a file or stream, using the `write` function. The `write` function takes a file or stream, a value to write, and a format string. In this case, the format string is ``, which" LLVM,RISCV,3401,"The next statement of this code snippet is: ` :: write ( OS , Binary , ) ;` This is a method call to the `write` method of the `` class, passing in the `OS`, `Binary`, and `` objects as arguments. The purpose of this statement is to write the binary code for the instruction to the output stream `OS`." LLVM,RISCV,3402,"This code snippet appears to be part of a disassembler or decompiler for a specific instruction set architecture (ISA). The code is using the LLVM library to generate machine code for the ISA. The next statement of the code snippet is likely to be a call to the `write` method of the `MCInst` class, which is used to write the machine code for the instruction to a file or other output stream. The `write` method takes three arguments: the output stream, the binary code for the instruction, and the size of the instruction in bytes. Here is the next statement" LLVM,RISCV,3403,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be the continuation of the `switch` statement, with more cases to handle different values of `RVExpr->getKind()`." LLVM,RISCV,3404,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be a call to the `create` method of the `MCFixup` class, passing in the appropriate arguments to create a new fixup object. The exact arguments passed in will depend on the specific values of the variables and constants used in the code snippet." LLVM,RISCV,3405,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific values of the variables and the implementation of the `MO` object. However, based on the code snippet, it appears that the next statement will be an assertion that the result of the `getImm()` method is equal to a specific value, and that the result is also a string literal. The `MO` object is likely an instance of a class that has a `getImm()` method that returns an unsigned integer value. The `Res` variable is assigned the result of this method, and" LLVM,RISCV,3406,"The next statement after the `if` block is `llvm_unreachable();`. The `llvm_unreachable` macro is used to indicate that the code following it is unreachable, and is typically used to indicate that a certain branch of a conditional statement is not reachable. In this case, the `if` block checks whether `MO.isImm()` is true, and if it is, it returns the result of `MO.getImm()`. If `MO.isImm()` is false, the code following the" LLVM,RISCV,3407,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `MCCodeEmitter` class and the `MCContext` and `MCInstrInfo` classes. However, based on the names of the classes and the constructor parameters, it is likely that the next statement will be a call to the `MCCodeEmitter` constructor, which will initialize the object and prepare it for use." LLVM,RISCV,3408,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `MCCodeEmitter` class and the `MCContext` and `MCInstrInfo` classes. However, based on the names of the classes and the constructor parameters, it is likely that the next statement will be a call to the `MCCodeEmitter` constructor, which will initialize the object and prepare it for use." LLVM,RISCV,3409,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `MCCodeEmitter` class and the input data being processed. However, based on the name of the class and the method being overridden, it is likely that the next statement will be related to emitting machine code for a specific instruction set architecture (ISA). The `MCCodeEmitter` class is likely to be a part of a code generation framework that generates machine code for a specific ISA, and the `emit` method is likely to be responsible for em" LLVM,RISCV,3410,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `MCCodeEmitter` class and the input data being processed. However, based on the name of the class and the method being overridden, it is likely that the next statement will be related to emitting machine code for a specific instruction set architecture (ISA). The `MCCodeEmitter` class is likely to be a part of a code generation framework that generates machine code for a specific ISA, and the `emit` method is likely to be responsible for em" LLVM,RISCV,3411,"The next statement of this code snippet is: return new MCExpr(Expr, Kind, Ctx);" LLVM,RISCV,3412,"The next statement after the given code snippet is: `return Res;`" LLVM,RISCV,3413,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet without knowing the specific values of the variables and constants used in the code. However, based on the syntax and structure of the code, it appears to be a switch statement that is handling a specific case for the `VK__HI` value. The code inside the case statement is performing a bitwise AND operation on the result of a right shift operation and a constant value. The right shift operation is shifting the value of `Value` by a certain number of bits, and the bitwise AND operation is masking" LLVM,RISCV,3414,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `Res = MCValue::get(Target.getSymA(), nullptr, Target.getConstant() + (Fixup->getOffset() - AUIPCOffset));` This statement is assigning a new value to the `Res` variable, which is a `MCValue` object. The new value is constructed using the `MCValue::get` method, which takes three arguments: the symbol, the offset, and the constant. In this case, the symbol is `Target.getSymA()`, the offset is `nullptr" LLVM,RISCV,3415,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `const auto * DF = dyn_cast_or_null < MCDataFragment > ( AUIPCSRE -> findAssociatedFragment ( ) ) ;` This statement is using the `dyn_cast_or_null` function to cast the result of `AUIPCSRE -> findAssociatedFragment ( )` to a `MCDataFragment` pointer. If the cast is successful, the resulting pointer is stored in `DF`. If the cast fails, `DF` is set to `nullptr`." LLVM,RISCV,3416,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return nullptr;` Explanation: The code snippet is checking if the `DF` object is null, and if it is, it returns `nullptr`. If `DF` is not null, it continues to the next statement, which is the `for` loop. The `for` loop iterates over the fixups in `DF` and checks if the offset of each fixup matches the offset of the `AUIPCSymbol` symbol. If the offsets match, it checks the kind of the fixup and returns the fix" LLVM,RISCV,3417,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return StringSwitch(name).Case(, VK__LO).Case(, VK__HI).Case(, VK__PCREL_LO).Case(, VK__PCREL_HI).Default(VK_` variable." LLVM,RISCV,3419,"The next statement after the `if (HasVariant)` block is `Expr -> print ( OS , MAI ) ;`." LLVM,RISCV,3420,"The next statement after the `if (HasVariant)` block is `Expr -> print ( OS , MAI ) ;`." LLVM,RISCV,3421,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the `visitUsedExpr` method is dependent on the specific implementation of the `MCExpr` class and the `MCStreamer` class. However, based on the name of the method and the parameters it takes, it is likely that the method is intended to visit all of the expressions that are used by the `MCExpr` object, and to stream them to the `MCStreamer` object. Therefore, the next statement of this code snippet is likely to be a call to the" LLVM,RISCV,3422,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `Streamer` class and the `visitUsedExpr` method. However, based on the name of the method and the fact that it is being called on a `Streamer` object, it is likely that the next statement will involve the `Streamer` object visiting the expression that is returned by the `getSubExpr` method." LLVM,RISCV,3423,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be: `if (Value.isPCRelative()) return false;` This is because the code checks the kind of the value (using the `Kind` variable) and returns `false` if it is a PC-relative value. The `Kind` variable is likely to be an enumeration that represents the different types of values that can be encountered in the code, and the `VK_` values are likely to be specific to the ISA (Instruction Set Architecture) being used. The code then checks if" LLVM,RISCV,3424,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `Res = evaluateAsInt64(Value.getConstant());` This statement assigns the result of the `evaluateAsInt64` function, which takes the constant value of the `Value` object as an argument, to the `Res` variable. The `evaluateAsInt64` function is called on the result of the `getConstant` method of the `Value` object, which returns the constant value of the `Value` object as an `int64_t`." LLVM,RISCV,3425,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the implementation of the `MCValue` class and the specific inputs being used. However, based on the syntax and the fact that the `getSymA`, `getSymB`, and `getConstant` methods are being called on `Res`, it is likely that the next statement will be a call to one of these methods, or possibly a call to a method that takes the results of these methods as arguments." LLVM,RISCV,3426,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return true;` Explanation: The `evaluateAsRelocatableImpl` method is checking if the subexpression can be evaluated as a relocatable value. If the subexpression cannot be evaluated as a relocatable value, the method returns `false`. Otherwise, the method sets the `Res` variable to a new `MCValue` object with the same symbol and constant values as the original `Res` object, but with the `getKind` method of the current `MCExpr` object as the kind. The method then returns" LLVM,RISCV,3427,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the implementation of the `getKind()` method and the possible return values it can produce. However, based on the code snippet provided, it is likely that the `default` case will be executed if the `getKind()` method returns a value that is not handled by any of the other `case` statements. In this case, the `default` case will simply return without executing any further code." LLVM,RISCV,3428,"The next statement in the code snippet is: `case MCExpr :: Unary :` This is a case statement that checks if the expression is a unary expression. If it is, the code inside the case statement will be executed." LLVM,RISCV,3429,The next statement after the `case MCExpr :: SymbolRef` block is the `default` block. LLVM,RISCV,3430,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `Offset = ;` This line sets the variable `Offset` to a specific value, which is represented by the placeholder ``. The value of `Offset` is used later in the code snippet to compare with the offset of each fixup in the data fragment." LLVM,RISCV,3431,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific values of the variables and the behavior of the functions being called. However, based on the pattern of the code, it is likely that the next statement will be a `return` statement, as the previous statements all end with a `return` statement. The next statement is likely to be `return ;`, where `` is a string literal that is returned by the function. The exact value of `` will depend on the specific implementation of" LLVM,RISCV,3432,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific values of the variables and the behavior of the functions being called. However, based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the next statement will be: `OS << ')';` This is because the previous statement was `Expr -> print ( OS , MAI )`, which is likely to have printed the expression to the output stream `OS`. The next statement is `if ( Kind == VK__CALL_PLT ) OS << ; This is because the code checks if the size of the contents of the data fragment is equal to the offset of the symbol, and if so, it sets the offset to ." LLVM,RISCV,3437,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be the evaluation of the `StringSwitch` expression, which will return the `VariantKind` value corresponding to the given `name` string. The `StringSwitch` expression is a C++11 feature that allows for a more concise way of writing a chain of `if-else` statements, where each `if` statement checks if the input string matches a specific pattern. In this case, the `StringSwitch` expression checks if the `name` string matches any of the patterns specified in the `Case` statements, and returns the corresponding `VariantKind" LLVM,RISCV,3438,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be the evaluation of the `StringSwitch` expression, which will return the `VariantKind` value corresponding to the given `name` string. The `StringSwitch` expression is a C++11 feature that allows for a more concise way of writing a chain of `if-else` statements, where each `if` statement checks if the input string matches a specific pattern. In this case, the `StringSwitch` expression checks if the `name` string matches any of the patterns specified in the `Case` statements, and returns the corresponding `VariantKind" LLVM,RISCV,3439,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet without knowing the values of the variables and the specific implementation of the functions being called. However, based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the code is handling different types of relocations for a target platform. The code is checking the value of the `VK_` variable and returning a string literal based on the value. The string literals returned are likely to be used as part of the relocation process. Without more information, it is not possible to predict the exact next statement of the code." LLVM,RISCV,3440,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `if (Kind == VK__CALL_PLT) OS << ;` This is because the `if` statement checks if the `Kind` variable is equal to `VK__CALL_PLT`, and if it is, it executes the statement `OS << `." LLVM,RISCV,3441,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `Res = evaluateAsInt64(Value.getConstant());` This statement assigns the result of the `evaluateAsInt64` function, which takes the constant value of the `Value` object as an argument, to the `Res` variable. The `evaluateAsInt64` function is not shown in the code snippet, but it is likely to be a member function of the `MCExpr` class that returns an `int64_t` value." LLVM,RISCV,3442,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific inputs and the implementation of the `getSubExpr()` function. However, based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the next statement will be a call to the `evaluateAsRelocatable()` function, which is a member function of the `MCValue` class. The `evaluateAsRelocatable()` function takes three arguments: a `MCValue` object, a `MCContext` object, and a `MCExpr` object. The function returns a `MCValue` object that" LLVM,RISCV,3443,"The next statement after the `if` statement in the code snippet you provided is: ``` return false; ``` This statement is executed if the `evaluateAsRelocatable` method returns `false`." LLVM,RISCV,3444,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `switch ( ( unsigned ) F . getKind ( ) ) {` This line is checking the kind of fixup that is being processed. The `getKind()` method is called on the `F` object, which is a `MCFixup` object, and the result is cast to an `unsigned` integer. The `switch` statement then checks the value of this integer to determine which case to execute." LLVM,RISCV,3445,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific values of the variables and the behavior of the `llvm_unreachable` function. However, based on the code snippet, it appears that the `default` case is unreachable, and the function will either return a string literal or call `llvm_unreachable` depending on the value of the `VK_` variable." LLVM,RISCV,3446,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be a `case` statement, as the `switch` statement is used to handle different values of the `Kind` variable. The `case` statement will specify a specific value of `Kind` and the corresponding string to return. Without knowing the specific values of `Kind` and the strings to return, it is not possible to predict the exact next statement. However, based on the naming conventions used in the code snippet, it is likely that the `case` statements will be used to handle different variants of a machine code expression, and each `case`" LLVM,RISCV,3447,"Based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the next statement will be: `case VK__PCREL_HI :` This is because the code is currently evaluating the `getKind()` method, which returns a value that determines the type of instruction being evaluated. The `switch` statement is checking the value returned by `getKind()` and executing the appropriate code block based on the value. In this case, the code is currently evaluating the `VK__PCREL_LO`" LLVM,RISCV,3448,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return false;` Explanation: The code snippet is a method that returns a boolean value. It first checks if `Res.getSymA()` and `Res.getSymB()` are both true. If they are, it then checks the value of `getKind()`. If the value is `VK__LO`, `VK__HI`, `VK__PCREL_LO`, or `VK_" LLVM,RISCV,3449,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the `getFixupKind` function is not specified. However, based on the name of the function and the fact that it is a member of a class that has a `const` qualifier, it is likely that the function returns a value of some kind that represents the fixup kind of the object." LLVM,RISCV,3450,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `Offset = ;` This is because the `if` statement checks if the size of the contents of the current data fragment `DF` is equal to the `Offset` variable, and if it is, it sets `DF` to the next data fragment and sets `Offset` to ``. If the `if` statement is not true, the code inside the `if` block is not executed, and the next statement is the `for` loop." LLVM,RISCV,3451,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be the initialization of the `Kind` and `Expr` members of the `MCExpr` class. The `Kind` member is initialized with the value of the `Kind` parameter passed to the constructor, and the `Expr` member is initialized with the value of the `Expr` parameter passed to the constructor. Here is the predicted next statement: ``` Kind = Kind; Expr = Expr; ```" LLVM,RISCV,3452,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be the initialization of the `Kind` and `Expr` members of the `MCExpr` class. The `Kind` member is initialized with the value of the `Kind` parameter passed to the constructor, and the `Expr` member is initialized with the value of the `Expr` parameter passed to the constructor. Here is the predicted next statement: ``` Kind = Kind; Expr = Expr; ```" LLVM,RISCV,3453,"The next statement after the `if` statement is the `return false` statement. The `if` statement checks whether the result of `getSubExpr()->evaluateAsRelocatable(Value, nullptr, nullptr)` is `false`. If it is `false`, then the `return false` statement is executed, which returns `false` from the function. The `if` statement also checks whether `Value.isAbsolute()` is `false`. If it is `false`, then the `return false` statement is executed, which returns `false` from the function. There" LLVM,RISCV,3454,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `MCExpr` class and the context in which this code is being executed. However, based on the syntax and the fact that this is a constructor call, it is likely that the next statement will be an assignment or initialization of a variable or field with the newly created `MCExpr` object." LLVM,RISCV,3455,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return new (Ctx) MCExpr(Kind, Expr);` This statement creates a new instance of the `MCExpr` class, passing in the `Kind` and `Expr` parameters, and returns a pointer to the new instance. The `new` operator is used to allocate memory for the new instance, and the `Ctx` parameter is used to specify the context in which the expression is being created." LLVM,RISCV,3456,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific values of the variables and the behavior of the code. However, based on the structure of the code, it is likely that the next statement will be the `break` statement, which will exit the `switch` block and continue execution at the next statement outside the block." LLVM,RISCV,3457,"The next statement in the code snippet is: `case MCExpr::SymbolRef:` This is because the `switch` statement is checking the value of `Expr->getKind()`, and the next case after `MCExpr::Binary` is `MCExpr::SymbolRef`." LLVM,RISCV,3458,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific values of the variables and the behavior of the code. However, based on the pattern of the code, it is likely that the next statement will be a `case` statement with a similar structure to the previous ones, such as: ``` case VK__LO12 : return ; ``` This is because the code appears to be using a `switch` statement to handle different cases based on the value of a variable, and the" LLVM,RISCV,3459,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet without knowing the specific values of the variables and the logic of the code. However, based on the pattern of the code, it appears that the next statement could be: case VK__TPREL_HI20 : return ; This is because the code appears to be handling a series of cases for different types of relocations, and the previous cases have been handled in a similar way. The next case would likely be for a different type of relocation, and the" LLVM,RISCV,3460,"This code snippet is using the `StringSwitch` class from the LLVM library to perform a switch statement on the `name` variable, which is of type `ISA_LIT`. The `Case` method is used to specify the different cases for the switch statement, and the `Default` method is used to specify the default case. The `Case` method takes two arguments: the first is a string literal that represents the case label, and the second is a value of type `VariantKind` that represents the value to be returned for that case. The `Default` method takes no arguments and simply" LLVM,RISCV,3461,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the implementation of the `printVariantKind` and `getSubExpr` functions. However, based on the names of these functions, it is likely that the next statement will be related to printing or evaluating an expression. Here are a few possibilities: 1. The next statement could be a call to `printVariantKind` with the `OS` and `Kind` arguments, which would print the variant kind to the output stream. 2. The next statement could be a call to `get" LLVM,RISCV,3462,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty because it depends on the specific values of the variables and the behavior of the code. However, based on the information provided, it appears that the code is handling different cases for a switch statement, where the variable `VK` is being compared to different values. The first case is `VK__None`, which sets the variable `closeParen` to `false`. The second case is `VK__LO12`, which appends a string" LLVM,RISCV,3463,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `case VK__LO :` This is because the `switch` statement is checking the value of `getKind()`, which is a member function of the `MCExpr` class. The `VK__LO` case is the first case that is reached after the `default` case, and it is the next statement that will be executed." LLVM,RISCV,3464,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `Res = MCValue::get(Target.getSymA(), nullptr, Target.getConstant() + (Fixup->getOffset() - AUIPCOffset));` This statement is assigning a value to the `Res` variable using the `MCValue::get` method. The method takes three arguments: the symbol of the target, a null pointer, and an expression that combines the constant value of the target with the offset of the fixup minus the offset of the AUIPC symbol. The resulting value is then assigned" LLVM,RISCV,3465,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `if (AUIPCOffset + Target.getSymA()->getSymbol().getOffset() > 0x80000000) return false;` This statement checks if the sum of the offset of the AUIPC symbol and the offset of the target symbol is greater than 0x80000000. If it is, the function returns false." LLVM,RISCV,3466,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `Offset = AUIPCSymbol -> getOffset ( ) ;` This statement assigns the value of `AUIPCSymbol -> getOffset ( )` to the variable `Offset`." LLVM,RISCV,3467,"The code snippet is a part of a function that is iterating over the fixups in a data fragment. The function is checking the offset of each fixup and the kind of fixup. If the offset is not equal to the current offset or the kind of fixup is not a specific value, the function continues to the next fixup. Based on the information provided, it is not possible to predict the next statement of the code snippet with certainty. However, it is likely that the next statement will be a case statement or a series of case statements that handle different values of the fixup kind." LLVM,RISCV,3468,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be: `if (AUIPCSymbol->getKind() != MCSymbolRefExpr::VK_None) return false;` This is because the previous statement checks if the symbol associated with the `AUIPCSRE` is not null, and if it is not null, it checks if the kind of the symbol is not `VK_None`. If the kind of the symbol is `VK_None`, the function returns `false`." LLVM,RISCV,3469,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `Res = evaluateAsInt64(Value.getConstant());` This statement assigns the result of the `evaluateAsInt64` function to the `Res` variable. The `evaluateAsInt64` function takes the constant value of the `Value` object as an argument and returns an integer value." LLVM,RISCV,3470,The next statement after `Res = evaluateAsInt64 ( Value . getConstant ( ) ) ;` is `return true ;`. LLVM,RISCV,3471,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `Res = MCValue();` This statement initializes the `Res` variable with an empty `MCValue` object. The `MCValue` class is a part of the LLVM project and is used to represent a value in the LLVM intermediate representation. The `evaluateAsRelocatableImpl` method is a member function of the `MCExpr` class, which is a base class for all expressions in the LLVM intermediate representation. The `MCValue` object is used to store the result of the expression evaluation." LLVM,RISCV,3472,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `Res = getSubExpr()->evaluateAsRelocatable(Res, Layout, Fixup);` This statement assigns the result of the `evaluateAsRelocatable` method called on the subexpression of the `MCExpr` object to the `Res` variable. The `getSubExpr` method is called on the `MCExpr` object to get the subexpression, and the `evaluateAsRelocatable` method is called on the subexpression with the same arguments as the original method call." LLVM,RISCV,3473,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet without knowing the implementation of the `getSubExpr` and `findAssociatedFragment` methods. However, based on the syntax and the names of the methods, it is likely that the next statement will be a call to a method that returns a value that is associated with the subexpression. Here is a possible next statement: ``` return getSubExpr().findAssociatedFragment().getAssociatedValue(); ``` This statement would call the `getAssociatedValue` method on the result of the `findAssociatedFragment` method, which" LLVM,RISCV,3474,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet without knowing the implementation of the `getSubExpr` and `findAssociatedFragment` methods. However, based on the syntax and the names of the methods, it is likely that the next statement will be a call to a method that returns a value that is associated with the subexpression. Here is a possible next statement: ``` return getSubExpr().findAssociatedFragment().getAssociatedValue(); ``` This statement would call the `getAssociatedValue` method on the result of the `findAssociatedFragment` method, which" LLVM,RISCV,3475,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the `fixELFSymbolsInTLSFixups` function is dependent on the specific implementation of the `MCAssembler` class and the `Asm` object. However, based on the name of the function and the fact that it is being called as an override, it is likely that the function is intended to fix ELF symbols in TLS (Thread-Local Storage) fixups. This could involve updating the symbol table or other metadata to ensure that the TLS fixups are correct and" LLVM,RISCV,3476,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the `fixELFSymbolsInTLSFixups` function is dependent on the specific implementation of the `MCAssembler` class and the `Asm` object. However, based on the name of the function and the fact that it is being called as an override, it is likely that the function is intended to fix ELF symbols in TLS (Thread-Local Storage) fixups. This could involve updating the symbol table or other metadata to ensure that the TLS fixups are correct and" LLVM,RISCV,3477,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the context in which the code is being executed. However, based on the syntax and the fact that the `Kind` variable is being returned, it is likely that the next statement will be the end of the function or method that this code snippet is a part of." LLVM,RISCV,3478,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the `getKind` method is not a standard method in C++ and its implementation is not provided. However, based on the name of the method and the return type, it is likely that this method is intended to return the kind or type of variant that is being represented by the object. Without more information about the specific implementation of this method, it is not possible to provide a more specific prediction about what the next statement of this code snippet will be." LLVM,RISCV,3479,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `Expr` class and the context in which the code is being executed. However, based on the syntax and the fact that the `return` statement is used to return a value from a function, it is likely that the next statement after this code snippet will be the end of the function or method that contains this code." LLVM,RISCV,3480,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `Expr` class and the context in which the code is being executed. However, based on the syntax and the fact that the `return` statement is used to return a value from a function, it is likely that the next statement after this code snippet will be the end of the function or method that contains this code." LLVM,RISCV,3481,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return StringSwitch < MCExpr :: VariantKind > ( name ) . Case ( , VK__LO ) . Case ( , VK__HI ) . Case ( , VK__PCREL_HI ) . Default ( VK__Invalid ) ;` This" LLVM,RISCV,3482,The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be a switch statement or a series of if-else statements that check the value of the `name` parameter and return the corresponding `VariantKind` value. LLVM,RISCV,3483,"The next statement in this code snippet is: return ; Explanation: The code snippet is a method that returns a string literal based on the value of the enum `VariantKind`. The `switch` statement checks the value of `Kind` and returns a different string literal for each possible value of `Kind`. The `default` case is unreachable, meaning that it will never be executed. Therefore, the next statement in the code snippet is the `return` statement that returns a string literal." LLVM,RISCV,3484,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `this->Expr = Expr;` This statement assigns the value of the `Expr` parameter to the `Expr` member variable of the `MCExpr` object being constructed." LLVM,RISCV,3485,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `this->Expr = Expr;` This statement assigns the value of the `Expr` parameter to the `Expr` member variable of the `MCExpr` object being constructed." LLVM,RISCV,3486,"The next statement of this code snippet is: return (Flags & VariantKindMask) >> VariantKindShift;" LLVM,RISCV,3487,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `OutMI.setOpcode(Opcode);` This line sets the opcode of the `OutMI` object to the value of the `Opcode` variable." LLVM,RISCV,3488,"Based on the code snippet provided, it appears to be a part of a function that takes a `MachineOperand` object as an argument and returns a `MCOperand` object. The function appears to be responsible for lowering a machine operand to a specific format or representation. The code snippet you provided is a switch statement that handles different types of machine operands. The switch statement checks the type of the machine operand and performs different actions based on the type. Based on the code you provided, it is difficult to predict the next statement of the code snippet with certainty. However," LLVM,RISCV,3489,The next statement after the `switch` block is the declaration of the `const MCExpr * Expr` variable. LLVM,RISCV,3490,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `Expr = MCBinaryExpr::createAdd(Expr, OffsetExpr, Ctx);` This statement adds the offset expression to the symbol reference expression, creating a new expression that represents the sum of the two. The resulting expression is stored in the `Expr` variable." LLVM,RISCV,3491,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `MCInstLower::MCInstLower(MCContext &ctx, AsmPrinter &asmprinter) : Ctx(ctx), AsmPrinter(asmprinter) {` This is a constructor for the `MCInstLower` class, which takes a `MCContext` object and an `AsmPrinter` object as arguments. The constructor initializes the `Ctx` and `AsmPrinter` members of the class with the values passed in as arguments." LLVM,RISCV,3492,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `MCInstLower::MCInstLower(MCContext &ctx, AsmPrinter &asmprinter) : Ctx(ctx), AsmPrinter(asmprinter) {` This is a constructor for the `MCInstLower` class, which takes a `MCContext` object and an `AsmPrinter` object as arguments. The constructor initializes the `Ctx` and `AsmPrinter` members of the class with the values passed in as arguments." LLVM,RISCV,3493,"Based on the code snippet you provided, it appears to be related to the LLVM compiler infrastructure. The code is likely setting up a machine instruction to be emitted by the assembler. The next statement is likely to be a call to the `emit` method of the `MachineInstr` class, which is used to emit the machine instruction to the assembler. The `emit` method takes a `MachineInstr` object as an argument, which is the instruction to be emitted. Here is the predicted next statement: ``` OutMI.emit(OutMI); ```" LLVM,RISCV,3494,"Based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the next statement after the `switch` statement will be the `case` statement for `MachineOperand::MO_JumpTableIndex`. The `switch` statement is checking the value of `MO.getOpcode()` and selecting the appropriate `case` statement to execute based on that value. The `case` statements are checking the value of `MO.getOpcode()` and executing the corresponding code block if the value matches the case. In this case, the `switch` statement is checking the value of `MO.getOpcode()` against" LLVM,RISCV,3495,"Based on the code snippet you provided, it appears to be a switch statement that is setting the value of a variable called `Kind` based on the value of a string literal. The string literals are all different, so it's difficult to predict exactly what the next statement will be. However, based on the pattern of the code, it's likely that the next statement will be another `case` statement that sets the value of `Kind` based on the value of a different string literal." LLVM,RISCV,3496,"Based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the next statement after the `switch` statement will be the `default` case, which is: `report_fatal_error();` This statement will report a fatal error with the specified string literal as the error message." LLVM,RISCV,3497,"Based on the code snippet, it is difficult to predict the next statement with certainty. However, based on the context and the information provided, it is likely that the next statement will be related to the processing of the operands of the machine instruction. The code snippet is part of a function that is processing a machine instruction (represented by the `MachineInstr` object `MI`) and its operands. The function is using the `TargetRegisterInfo` object `TRI` to get information about the registers used in the instruction. The `TSFlags` variable contains the flags for the instruction, and" LLVM,RISCV,3498,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `OutMI.addOperand(MCOp);` This is because the `for` loop is currently iterating over the operands of the `MachineInstr` object `MI`, and for each operand, it is calling the `LowerMachineOperandToMCOperand` function to convert the operand to an `MCOperand` object. The resulting `MCOperand` object is then added to the `OutMI` object using the `addOperand` method." LLVM,RISCV,3499,"Based on the code snippet you provided, it appears to be a part of a function that is checking the opcode of a machine instruction and taking different actions based on the opcode. The next statement that will be executed is: `OutMI.setOpcode();` This line sets the opcode of the machine instruction `OutMI` to the value of the string literal ``." LLVM,RISCV,3500,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific inputs and the implementation of the `lowerSymbolOperand` function. However, based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the next statement will be a call to `lowerSymbolOperand` with the `MO_JumpTableIndex` case. The `switch` statement is checking the value of `MO.getKind()` and executing the corresponding case statement. In this case, `MO.getKind()` is returning `MachineOperand::MO_JumpTableIndex`, which corresponds to the" LLVM,RISCV,3501,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific values of the variables and the behavior of the functions called. However, based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the next statement will be: `MCOp = MCOperand::createReg(MO->getReg());` This is because the code is currently inside the `case MachineOperand::MO_Register` block, and the next statement after the `if` statement is the `MCOp = MCOperand::createReg(MO->getReg());`" LLVM,RISCV,3502,"The next statement after the `switch` statement is the declaration of the `ME` variable. The `switch` statement is checking the value of `MO.getTargetFlags()` and setting the `Kind` variable accordingly. The `default` case is unreachable, so it will never be executed. The `case` statements are checking for specific values of `MO.getTargetFlags()` and setting `Kind` to a specific value based on that. The `ME` variable is then declared and initialized with a call to `MCSymbolRefExpr::create()`. This creates a new `M" LLVM,RISCV,3503,"Based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the next statement will be: `Kind = MCExpr :: VK__LO;` This is because the `switch` statement is checking the value of `MO.getTargetFlags()`, and the next case after the `default` case is `case : Kind = MCExpr :: VK__LO ; break ;`." LLVM,RISCV,3504,"Based on the code snippet you provided, it appears that the `Kind` variable is being set to a value based on the target flags. The `switch` statement is checking the value of `MO.getTargetFlags()` and setting `Kind` to a specific value based on the result. Without knowing the specific values of `MO.getTargetFlags()` or the possible values of `Kind`, it's difficult to predict the exact next statement of the code. However, based on the pattern of the code, it's likely that the next statement will be another `case` statement that sets `Kind`" LLVM,RISCV,3505,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific input and the behavior of the `llvm_unreachable` function. However, based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the `llvm_unreachable` function is being called with a string literal as an argument, and the function is returning a value of type `MCExpr`. The `case` statements that follow the call to `llvm_unreachable` are checking the value of the `Kind` field of the `MCExpr` object that was returned" LLVM,RISCV,3506,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return MCOperand::createExpr(ME);` This statement is outside the `if` block, so it will be executed regardless of the outcome of the `if` condition. It creates a new `MCOperand` object using the `ME` object, which is a `MCExpr` object, and returns it." LLVM,RISCV,3507,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `const MCExpr * ME = MCSymbolRefExpr :: create ( Sym , MCSymbolRefExpr :: VK_None , Ctx ) ;` This statement creates a new `MCExpr` object by calling the `create` method of the `MCSymbolRefExpr` class, passing in the `Sym` object, the `VK_None` variant kind, and the `Ctx` object. The resulting `MCExpr` object is stored in the `ME` variable." LLVM,RISCV,3508,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return MCOperand::createExpr(ME);` This statement returns a new `MCOperand` object that wraps the `ME` expression. The `MCOperand` class is a part of the LLVM IR library and is used to represent operands in LLVM IR instructions. The `createExpr` method is used to create a new `MCOperand` object that wraps the given expression." LLVM,RISCV,3509,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific values of the constants and the behavior of the `llvm_unreachable` function. However, based on the syntax and the context of the code, it appears that the next statement will be a call to the `llvm_unreachable` function with the string literal `""Invalid relocation type""` as an argument. This function is likely to terminate the program with an error message indicating that an invalid relocation type has been encountered." LLVM,RISCV,3510,"Based on the code snippet you provided, it appears that the `TargetKind` variable is being assigned a value based on the value of `MO.getTargetFlags()`. The `switch` statement is checking the value of `MO.getTargetFlags()` and assigning a value to `TargetKind` based on that value. The possible values of `TargetKind` are: * `MCExpr::VK__HI20` * `MCExpr::VK__LO12` * `MCExpr::V" LLVM,RISCV,3511,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `Expr = MCBinaryExpr::createAdd(Expr, OffsetExpr, Ctx);` This is because the code is currently creating a new `MCExpr` object called `OffsetExpr` using the `MCConstantExpr::create` method, and then adding it to the existing `Expr` object using the `MCBinaryExpr::createAdd` method. The resulting expression will be the sum of the two expressions." LLVM,RISCV,3512,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be the continuation of the `for` loop, which will iterate over the remaining operands of the `MachineInstr` object `MI`. The loop will continue to call the `LowerMachineOperandToMCOperand` function on each operand, and if the function returns `true`, the operand will be added to the `OutMI` object." LLVM,RISCV,3513,"Based on the code snippet you provided, it appears to be a part of a function that is responsible for lowering machine operands to LLVM machine operands. The function takes in a `MachineOperand` object and a `MCOperand` object, and it appears to be using a switch statement to determine the type of the machine operand and perform the appropriate action. Based on the code you provided, it is difficult to predict the next statement of the code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific values of the `MachineOperand` and `MCOperand` objects that" LLVM,RISCV,3514,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `MCOp.setReg(Reg);`" LLVM,RISCV,3515,"Based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the next statement after the `switch` statement will be the `default` case, which is `report_fatal_error()`" LLVM,RISCV,3516,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be the closing brace of the `for` loop, which would indicate the end of the loop and the start of the next statement outside the loop." LLVM,RISCV,3517,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the program depends on the specific inputs and the implementation of the `MCOperand` class. However, based on the code snippet provided, it is likely that the next statement will be an assignment to the `MCOp` variable, such as: ``` MCOp = MCOperand(some_value); ``` This is because the `MCOperand` class is likely to have a constructor that takes a single argument, and the `MCOp` variable is likely to be" LLVM,RISCV,3518,"Based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the next statement after the `switch` statement will be the `case MachineOperand::MO_RegisterMask` statement. The `switch` statement is checking the value of `MO.getOpcode()` and executing the corresponding `case` statement. The `case MachineOperand::MO_RegisterMask` statement is the first `case` statement that is executed after the `switch` statement, so it is the next statement that will be executed. Therefore, the next statement of this code snippet will be: ``` case MachineOperand::" LLVM,RISCV,3519,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific inputs and the behavior of the `MachineOperand` and `MCOperand` classes. However, based on the code provided, it appears that the next statement will be: `case MachineOperand::MO_ExternalSymbol: MCOp = lowerSymbolOperand(MO, AP.GetExternalSymbolSymbol(MO.getSymbolName()), AP); break;` This is because the previous `case` statement was `MachineOperand::MO_BlockAddress`, and the next `case" LLVM,RISCV,3520,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the code depends on the specific implementation of the `getContext` and `getSubtargetInfo` methods, as well as the state of the object being operated on. However, based on the names of the methods and the context in which they are being called, it is likely that the next statement will be a call to a method on the `MCSubtargetInfo` object returned by `getSubtargetInfo`. The `MCSubtargetInfo` class is part of the LLVM project and is used to represent" LLVM,RISCV,3521,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the program depends on the specific values of the variables and the implementation of the functions called. However, based on the information provided, it is likely that the next statement after the `unsigned ( ) const` line will be a call to the `std::string` constructor, which will create a new `std::string` object from the string literal passed as an argument to the function." LLVM,RISCV,3522,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `llvm_unreachable();` Explanation: The code snippet is a switch statement that handles different cases based on the value of `Kind`. The current case is `MCSymbolRefExpr::VK_GOT`, which means that the symbol is a global offset table (GOT) symbol. The next statement in this case is `llvm_unreachable();`, which means that the code should not be reachable. The `ll" LLVM,RISCV,3523,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `case MCSymbolRefExpr::VK_GOT: llvm_unreachable();` Explanation: The code snippet is a switch statement that checks the value of `Modifier`, which is a variant kind modifier for a symbol reference expression. The switch statement has four cases: 1. `MCSymbolRefExpr::VK_None`: If the modifier is `VK_None`, the code checks if `IsPCRel` is true. If it is," LLVM,RISCV,3524,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `FK_Data_4` case and the `ELF` class. However, based on the syntax and the fact that the `FK_Data_4` case is returning a value, it is likely that the next statement will be a `break` statement or a `return` statement. Without more information about the specific implementation, it is not possible to provide a more specific prediction. If you have access to the source code or can provide more context, I may be" LLVM,RISCV,3525,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `getAbsoluteReloc` function and the value of the `Kind` parameter. However, based on the name of the function and the parameter, it is likely that the function is used to retrieve the absolute relocation value for a specific kind of relocation. The `Kind` parameter is likely to be an enumeration value that specifies the type of relocation being requested. Without more information about the specific implementation of the `getAbsoluteReloc` function," LLVM,RISCV,3526,"Based on the code snippet provided, it seems that the `getPCRelReloc` function is used to get the PC-relative relocation type for a given instruction kind. The function takes an `unsigned` parameter `Kind` and returns a value of type `unsigned`. The function uses a `switch` statement to determine the return value based on the value of `Kind`. If `Kind` is equal to `FK_Data_4`, the function returns `ELF::R__CALL`. If `Kind` is equal to `" LLVM,RISCV,3527,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet without knowing the specific values of the variables and the context in which the code is being executed. However, based on the syntax and the fact that the code is using the `case` keyword, it appears to be a switch statement. In a switch statement, the `case` keyword is used to specify a value that the switch statement should match against. In this case, the value being matched against is ``. If the value of `` matches the value of the `case` statement, then the code inside the" LLVM,RISCV,3528,"The next statement in the code snippet is: `case MCSymbolRefExpr :: VK_GOT :`" LLVM,RISCV,3529,"The next statement in the code snippet is: `case FK_Data_4: return ELF::R__TLS_TPREL32;` This statement is a case label in a switch statement, and it is executed when the value of the `FK_Data` variable is 4. The statement returns the value of the `ELF::R__TLS_TPREL32` constant." LLVM,RISCV,3530,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it appears to be part of a larger function and the context is not provided. However, based on the syntax and the fact that the function appears to be handling different types of data, it is likely that the next statement will be a case statement or a switch statement that handles different types of data. Without more information, it is not possible to provide a more specific answer. If you have any additional context or information about the code, I would be happy to try and provide a more detailed answer." LLVM,RISCV,3531,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `this->setRelocationModel(RelocationModel::Static);`" LLVM,RISCV,3532,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `this->setRelocationModel(RelocationModel::Static);`" LLVM,RISCV,3533,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `ObjectWriter` class and the context in which it is being used. However, based on the name of the class and the method being called, it is likely that the next statement will involve writing an object to some kind of output stream or file." LLVM,RISCV,3534,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `ObjectWriter` class and the context in which it is being used. However, based on the name of the class and the method being called, it is likely that the next statement will involve writing an object to some kind of output stream or file." LLVM,RISCV,3535,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `MAI->addInitialFrameState(Inst);` This statement adds the `MCCFIInstruction` object `Inst` to the initial frame state of the `MCAsmInfo` object `MAI`. The `addInitialFrameState` method is called on `MAI` and passes `Inst` as an argument." LLVM,RISCV,3536,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `MAI->addInitialFrameState(Inst);` This statement adds the `MCCFIInstruction` object `Inst` to the initial frame state of the `MCAsmInfo` object `MAI`. The `addInitialFrameState` method is called on `MAI` and passes `Inst` as an argument." LLVM,RISCV,3537,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `X -> initMCCodeGenInfo(RM, CM, OL);` This statement initializes the `MCCodeGenInfo` object with the values of `RM`, `CM`, and `OL`." LLVM,RISCV,3538,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `X -> initMCCodeGenInfo(RM, CM, OL);` This statement calls the `initMCCodeGenInfo` function with the arguments `RM`, `CM`, and `OL`. The function is not defined in the code snippet provided, so its behavior is unknown." LLVM,RISCV,3539,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return new MCInstPrinter(TT, SyntaxVariant, MAI, MII, MRI);` This statement creates a new instance of the `MCInstPrinter` class for the specified instruction set architecture (ISA) and returns a pointer to it. The `create` method is a factory method that creates a new instance of the `MCInstPrinter` class and returns a pointer to it. The `ISA_LIT` template parameter is used to specify the instruction set architecture for which the `" LLVM,RISCV,3540,"The next statement after the code snippet you provided is: `return X;` This statement returns the value of `X`, which is a pointer to a `MCInstrInfo` object, from the function." LLVM,RISCV,3541,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the code depends on the specific implementation of the `MCInstrInfo` class and the `Init` function. However, based on the names of the classes and functions involved, it appears that the code is creating a new instance of the `MCInstrInfo` class and initializing it with the `Init` function. The `Init` function is likely to perform some initialization tasks on the `MCInstrInfo` instance, such as setting up its internal state or configuring its behavior." LLVM,RISCV,3542,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet without knowing the context and the specific implementation of the `createELFStreamer` function. However, based on the name of the function and the parameters passed to it, it appears to be creating an ELF (Executable and Linkable Format) streamer object. The `Ctx` parameter is likely a context object that contains information about the current execution environment, such as the target architecture, the operating system, and any other relevant details. The `MAB` parameter is likely a memory allocation block object that is used to allocate memory for" LLVM,RISCV,3543,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return new MCSubtargetInfo(TT, CPU, FS);`" LLVM,RISCV,3544,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return new MCSubtargetInfo(TT, CPU, FS);`" LLVM,RISCV,3545,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it appears to be part of a larger program and the context is not provided. However, based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the next statement may be related to registering additional targets or target-specific information with the TargetRegistry. The code snippet registers various target-specific information and services with the TargetRegistry, such as code generation, instruction selection, and assembly emission. It is possible that the next statement may register additional target-specific information or services, such as optimization passes or code analysis tools. Without more" LLVM,RISCV,3546,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return new MCSubtargetInfo(TT, CPU, FS);`" LLVM,RISCV,3547,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `TargetRegistry` class and the `create` function. However, based on the names of the functions being registered, it is likely that the next statement will register additional targets with the `TargetRegistry`. Here are some possible next statements: * `TargetRegistry::RegisterMCCodeEmitter( * T, createMCCodeEmitter ) ;` * `TargetRegistry::RegisterMCInstPrinter( * T, createMCAsmInfo);` This is because the code snippet is iterating over an array of `Target` pointers, and for each `Target` pointer, it is registering various components with the `TargetRegistry`. The `RegisterMCAsmInfo` function is called with the current `Target` pointer and a function that creates an instance of the `MCAsmInfo` class." LLVM,RISCV,3549,"The next statement after the `if` block is the `return` statement, which returns a new `TargetELFStreamer` object." LLVM,RISCV,3550,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return new MCTargetStreamer(S, STI, TT);`" LLVM,RISCV,3551,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `TargetRegistry` class and the `create` function. However, based on the names of the functions being called, it appears that the code is registering various components of a target architecture with the `TargetRegistry` class. The `RegisterMCAsmBackend` function is likely registering an assembly backend for the target architecture, while the `RegisterMCCodeEmitter` function is registering a code emitter for the target architecture. The `RegisterMCInstPrinter` function" LLVM,RISCV,3552,"The next statement after the code snippet you provided is: `MAI->addInitialFrameState(Inst);` This line of code adds the `Inst` object, which is an instance of the `MCCFIInstruction` class, to the initial frame state of the machine code. The `addInitialFrameState` method is called on the `MAI` object, which is an instance of the `MachineCodeFrameInfo` class. This method adds the specified frame state to the initial frame state of the machine code, which is used to initialize the stack frame for the function." LLVM,RISCV,3553,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return new MCAsmInfo(MRI, TT);` This statement creates a new instance of the `MCAsmInfo` class for the specified ISA (Instruction Set Architecture) and returns a pointer to it. The `MCAsmInfo` class is a subclass of the `MCAsmInfo` class, and it provides information about the instruction set architecture and the target triple. The `create` method is a factory method that creates a new instance of the `MCAsmInfo` class for the" LLVM,RISCV,3554,"The next statement after the code snippet you provided is likely to be a return statement, as it is the last statement in the function. Here's a breakdown of the code snippet: * `MCAsmInfo * MAI = new MCAsmInfo ( TT ) ;`: This line creates a new instance of the `MCAsmInfo` class, passing in the `TT` object as a parameter. The `new` operator is used to allocate memory for the new object on the heap. The `MAI` variable is then assigned the address of" LLVM,RISCV,3555,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the `create` method is not specified. However, based on the name of the method and the fact that it is a static method, it is likely that it will create a new instance of the `MCRegisterInfo` class and return a pointer to it. Therefore, the next statement of this code snippet is likely to be: ``` MCRegisterInfo * X = createMCRegisterInfo ( TT ); ``` This statement creates a new instance of the `" LLVM,RISCV,3556,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the `create` method is not specified. However, based on the name of the method and the fact that it is a static method, it is likely that it will create a new instance of the `MCRegisterInfo` class and return a pointer to it. Therefore, the next statement of this code snippet is likely to be: ``` MCRegisterInfo * X = createMCRegisterInfo ( TT ); ``` This statement creates a new instance of the `" LLVM,RISCV,3557,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `TargetRegistry` class and the `RegisterMCInstrInfo` and `RegisterMCRegInfo` methods. However, based on the names of the methods and the fact that they are being called on a `TargetRegistry` object, it is likely that the next statement will be a call to one of these methods, passing in the `ISA_LIT` object as an argument. Here is an example of what the next statement might look like: ``` TargetRegistry::Register" LLVM,RISCV,3558,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be: `TargetRegistry::RegisterMCCodeEmitter(*T, createMCCodeEmitter);` This is because the code snippet is registering various components of the LLVM target with the `TargetRegistry` class, and the `MCCodeEmitter` is one of the components that is typically registered with the `TargetRegistry`. The `createMCCodeEmitter` function is likely to create an instance of the `MCCodeEmitter` class for the target" LLVM,RISCV,3559,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `if (CPUName.empty()) {` This statement checks if the `CPUName` string is empty, and if it is, it sets the `CPUName` string to a value based on the result of the `TT.isArch64Bit()` function." LLVM,RISCV,3560,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be a call to the `std::string` constructor, which takes a `const char*` as an argument and constructs a new `std::string` object from it. Here is an example of what the next statement might look like: ``` std::string CPUName(CPU); ``` This statement constructs a new `std::string` object named `CPUName` from the `CPU` variable, which is assumed to be a `const char*` pointing to a null-terminated string. The resulting `std::string" LLVM,RISCV,3561,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific values of the variables and the behavior of the `report_fatal_error` function. However, based on the code snippet, it appears that the `report_fatal_error` function is being called with a message that includes the string literal """" and the result of the `TT.isArch64Bit()` function. If the `TT.isArch64Bit()` function returns `true`, then the message will include the string literal """ LLVM,RISCV,3562,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `CPU = TT.isArch64Bit() ? : ;` This statement assigns the value of `CPU` to the result of the `isArch64Bit()` method of the `TT` object, which is a boolean value indicating whether the CPU is 64-bit or not. If the CPU is 64-bit, the value of `CPU` is set to the first string literal, otherwise it is set to the second string literal." LLVM,RISCV,3563,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be: `MAI->setDwarfRegNum(, true);` This is because the previous statement `Register SP = MRI.getDwarfRegNum(, true);` is setting the value of the `SP` register to the result of the `getDwarfRegNum` method, which is a method of the `MCRegisterInfo` class. The `setDwarfRegNum` method is likely to be used to set the value of the `SP` register to" LLVM,RISCV,3564,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return MAI;` Explanation: The code snippet creates a new `MCAsmInfo` object and initializes it with the `TT` parameter. It then creates a new `Register` object and initializes it with the `SP` parameter. It then creates a new `MCCFIInstruction` object and initializes it with the `nullptr`, `SP`, and `` parameters. Finally, it adds the `MCCFIInstruction` object to the `MCAsmInfo` object using the" LLVM,RISCV,3565,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be the creation of a new instance of the `MCStreamer` class, using the `create` method. The method takes several arguments, including the triple, context, and various unique pointers to other objects. The `create` method is likely to return a new instance of the `MCStreamer` class, which can then be used to generate machine code for the target architecture. Here is an example of how the code snippet might be used: ``` #include int main() {" LLVM,RISCV,3566,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `create` function and the types of the variables `Context`, `MAB`, `MOW`, `MCE`, and `RelaxAll`. However, based on the syntax and the names of the variables, it appears that the `create` function is being called with a number of arguments, and the return value is being assigned to a variable of type `ISA_LIT`. Here is a possible next statement: ``` ISA_LIT streamer = create<" LLVM,RISCV,3567,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be: `MAI->setInitialFrameState(Options);` This is because the previous line of code creates a new `MCAsmInfo` object and assigns it to the `MAI` variable. The next logical step would be to set the initial frame state of the assembler using the `setInitialFrameState` method, which takes a `MCTargetOptions` object as an argument." LLVM,RISCV,3568,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be: `MAI->initialize(MRI, TT, Options);` This is because the `createMCAsmInfo` function is creating a new instance of the `MCAsmInfo` class, and the `initialize` method is being called on that instance to initialize it with the specified register info, triple, and target options." LLVM,RISCV,3569,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `initMCObjectFileInfo` function and the context in which it is called. However, based on the name of the function and the parameters passed to it, it is likely that the function initializes or sets up some information related to the object file being generated by the compiler. Some possible next statements that could follow this code snippet include: * `MOFI -> setTargetTriple(Ctx->getTargetTriple());` * `MOFI -> setDataLayout(" LLVM,RISCV,3570,"The next statement after the code snippet you provided is likely to be a call to the `MCObjectFileInfo` constructor, which is responsible for initializing the object and preparing it for use. Here is an example of what the next statement might look like: ``` MCObjectFileInfo * MOFI = new MCObjectFileInfo(Ctx, PIC, LargeCodeModel); ``` This statement creates a new `MCObjectFileInfo` object and initializes it with the `Ctx`, `PIC`, and `LargeCodeModel` parameters. The `Ctx` parameter" LLVM,RISCV,3571,"The next statement after the `if` block is the assignment of the `CPU` variable. The `if` block checks if the `CPU` variable is empty or if it is equal to a specific string literal. If either of these conditions is true, the `CPU` variable is assigned a new value based on the result of the `TT.isArch64Bit()` method. Therefore, the next statement after the `if` block is: `CPU = TT.isArch64Bit() ? : `. In this case, `Imm` is set to the immediate value of the operand with index `` of the instruction `Inst`. Then, `Target` is set to the sum of `Addr` and `Imm`. Finally, the function returns `true`." LLVM,RISCV,3575,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `TargetRegistry` class and the `create` function. However, based on the names of the functions being called, it appears that the next statement is likely to be a call to `TargetRegistry::RegisterMCRelocationInfo`, which would register a relocation info object for the target." LLVM,RISCV,3576,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `TargetRegistry` class and the `create` function. However, based on the context and the names of the functions being called, it is likely that the next statement will be a call to `TargetRegistry::RegisterMCAsmBackend` or `TargetRegistry::RegisterMCCodeEmitter`, as these are the next functions in the list of functions being registered. It is also possible that the next statement could be a call to `TargetRegistry::RegisterMCInstPrinter`, `" LLVM,RISCV,3577,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be the initialization of the `MCInstrAnalysis` object with the provided `Info` object. In C++, the `explicit` keyword is used to indicate that a constructor is explicit, meaning that it can only be called with an explicit argument list. In this case, the constructor is being called with a single argument, `Info`, which is a pointer to a `MCInstrInfo` object. The constructor is then called with the `Info` object as its argument, which initializes the `MCInstrAnalysis` object with the" LLVM,RISCV,3578,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be the initialization of the `MCInstrAnalysis` object with the provided `Info` object. In C++, the `explicit` keyword is used to indicate that a constructor is explicit, meaning that it can only be called with an explicit argument list. In this case, the constructor is being called with a single argument, `Info`, which is a pointer to a `MCInstrInfo` object. The constructor is then called with the `Info` object as its argument, which initializes the `MCInstrAnalysis` object with the" LLVM,RISCV,3579,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `TargetRegistry` class and the `create` function. However, based on the code snippet provided, it is likely that the next statement will be a call to the `RegisterMCRegisterInfo` function, which is similar to the `RegisterMCAsmInfo` and `RegisterMCInstrInfo` functions called previously. Here is an example of what the next statement might look like: ``` TargetRegistry::RegisterMCRegisterInfo( *T, createaddInitialFrameState(Inst);` This is because the previous statement, `MCCFIInstruction Inst = MCCFIInstruction::cfiDefCfa(nullptr, SP, );`, creates a new `MCCFIInstruction` object and assigns it to the variable `Inst`. The next statement, `MAI->addInitialFrameState(Inst);`, adds the `Inst` object to the initial frame state of the machine code." LLVM,RISCV,3581,"The next statement of this code snippet is: RAReg = ;" LLVM,RISCV,3582,"The next statement in the code snippet is: `TargetRegistry::RegisterMCAsmInfo(*T, createMCAsmInfo);` This statement registers the `MCAsmInfo` class for the target `T`. The `createMCAsmInfo` expression creates an instance of the `MCAsmInfo` class for the target `T`. The `TargetRegistry::RegisterMCAsmInfo` function is then called with the instance of `MCAsmInfo` as an argument, which registers the `MCAsmInfo`" LLVM,RISCV,3583,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be: `TargetRegistry::RegisterMCCodeEmitter(*T, createMCCodeEmitter);` This is because the previous statement in the loop is `TargetRegistry::RegisterMCRegInfo(*T, createMCRegisterInfo);`, and the next statement is likely to be the registration of the code emitter for the target." LLVM,RISCV,3584,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `TargetRegistry` class and the `create` function. However, based on the context and the names of the functions being called, it is likely that the next statement will be a call to `TargetRegistry::RegisterTarget` or a similar function, passing in the `*T` pointer and a pointer to a `Target` object that was created by the `create` function." LLVM,RISCV,3585,"Based on the code snippet you provided, it appears that the next statement after the `for` loop would be the closing brace `}` for the `LLVMInitializeTargetMC` function. The `for` loop iterates over an array of `Target` objects, and for each `Target` object, it registers various components with the `TargetRegistry` class. The `TargetRegistry` class is used to manage the registration of targets and their associated components in the LLVM compiler infrastructure. The `createMCAsmInfo" LLVM,RISCV,3586,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `TargetRegistry` class and the `RegisterMCCodeEmitter`, `RegisterMCInstrInfo`, `RegisterMCRegInfo`, and `RegisterMCSubtargetInfo` methods. However, based on the naming conventions and the context of the code, it is likely that the next statement will be a call to one of these methods, passing in the appropriate arguments. For example, it could be: ``` TargetRegistry::RegisterMCCodeEmitter(ThesetDwarfRegNum(Reg, true);` This is because the `getDwarfRegNum` method is called with the `true` argument, which indicates that the register number should be returned for the specified register name. The return value of this method is then used" LLVM,RISCV,3588,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `TargetRegistry` class and the `create` function. However, based on the context and the names of the functions being called, it is likely that the next statement will be a call to `TargetRegistry::RegisterMCAsmBackend` or `TargetRegistry::RegisterMCCodeEmitter`, as these are the next functions in the sequence of calls to register different components of the target." LLVM,RISCV,3589,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `TargetRegistry` class and the `create` function. However, based on the context and the names of the functions being called, it is likely that the next statement will be a call to `TargetRegistry::RegisterMCSubtargetInfo` with the `ISA_LIT` parameter. This function is used to register a subtarget information object for the target, which is used to provide information about the target's instruction set architecture." LLVM,RISCV,3590,"Based on the code snippet you provided, it appears that the next statement will be: `TargetRegistry::RegisterMCCodeEmitter(*T, createMCCodeEmitter);` This is because the previous statement in the loop was `TargetRegistry::RegisterMCAsmBackend(*T, createAsmBackend);`, and the next statement in the loop is `TargetRegistry::RegisterMCCodeEmitter(*T, createMCCodeEmitter);`." LLVM,RISCV,3591,"The next statement after the code snippet you provided is likely to be a call to the `TargetAsmStreamer` constructor, which is a member function of the `TargetAsmStreamer` class. The constructor is responsible for initializing the object and preparing it for use. Here is an example of what the next statement might look like: ``` TargetAsmStreamer* streamer = new TargetAsmStreamer(S, OS); ``` This statement creates a new `TargetAsmStreamer` object and assigns it to the `streamer` variable. The `S" LLVM,RISCV,3592,"The next statement after the code snippet you provided is likely to be a call to the `TargetAsmStreamer` constructor, which is a member function of the `TargetAsmStreamer` class. The constructor is responsible for initializing the object and preparing it for use. Here is an example of what the next statement might look like: ``` TargetAsmStreamer* streamer = new TargetAsmStreamer(S, OS); ``` This statement creates a new `TargetAsmStreamer` object and assigns it to the `streamer` variable. The `S" LLVM,RISCV,3593,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return new MCAsmInfo ( TT ) ;` This statement creates a new instance of the `MCAsmInfo` class for the specified ISA (Instruction Set Architecture) and returns a pointer to it. The `ISA_LIT` template parameter is used to specify the ISA for which the `MCAsmInfo` instance is being created. The `MRI` and `TT` parameters are used to initialize the `MCAsmInfo` instance." LLVM,RISCV,3594,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `Init` function and the values of the variables `X` and ``. However, based on the syntax and the fact that the function is called with two arguments, it is likely that the next statement will be a call to another function or a statement that uses the result of the `Init` function." LLVM,RISCV,3595,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return new TargetELFStreamer(S, STI);` This statement creates a new instance of the `TargetELFStreamer` class, passing in the `S` and `STI` objects as arguments. The `TargetELFStreamer` class is a subclass of the `TargetStreamer` class, and is used to generate ELF object files. The `ISA_LIT` template parameter is used to specify the instruction set architecture (ISA) of the target machine." LLVM,RISCV,3596,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return new TargetELFStreamer(S, STI);` This statement creates a new instance of the `TargetELFStreamer` class, passing in the `S` and `STI` objects as arguments. The `TargetELFStreamer` class is a subclass of the `TargetStreamer` class, and is used to generate ELF object files. The `ISA_LIT` template parameter is used to specify the instruction set architecture (ISA) of the target machine." LLVM,RISCV,3597,"Based on the code snippet you provided, it appears that the next statement will be: `TargetRegistry::RegisterMCCodeEmitter(*T, createMCCodeEmitter);` This is because the previous statement in the loop was `TargetRegistry::RegisterMCAsmBackend(*T, createAsmBackend);`, and the next statement in the loop is `TargetRegistry::RegisterMCCodeEmitter(*T, createMCCodeEmitter);`." LLVM,RISCV,3598,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `TargetRegistry` class and the `create` function. However, based on the context and the names of the functions being called, it is likely that the next statement will be a call to `TargetRegistry::RegisterTarget` or a similar function, passing in the `*T` pointer and a pointer to a `Target` object that was created by the `create` function." LLVM,RISCV,3599,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `if (Tail.getOperand().isFI()) return false;` This statement checks if the operand at index `` of the `Tail` instruction is a FI (Floating-point Immediate) operand. If it is, the function returns `false`." LLVM,RISCV,3600,"Based on the code snippet provided, it appears to be a part of a function that is checking the tail of a machine instruction and folding the offset of a load instruction. The next statement is likely to be a case statement for the opcode of the machine instruction, which would determine the type of folding to be performed. The possible opcodes that could be checked in this case statement are: * * * * * * use_begin(HiLuiDestReg)->getParent();` This is because the previous statement, `HiLUI.getOperand().getReg()`, is used to get the register number of the destination operand of the `LUI` instruction, which is then passed to the `use_begin` method of the `MachineRegisterInfo` object `MRI` to get the first use of the register. The `getParent` method is then called on the" LLVM,RISCV,3602,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `LoADDI = &HiLUI;` Explanation: The `detectLuiAddiGlobal` function is checking if the `HiLUI` instruction is a `LUI` instruction with a global address operand, and if the `LoADDI` instruction is an `ADDI` instruction with a register operand that is the same as the register operand of the `LUI` instruction. If these conditions are met, the function sets the `LoADDI` pointer to the address of the `HiLUI" LLVM,RISCV,3603,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `ImmOp.setOffset(Offset);`" LLVM,RISCV,3604,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `if (Tail.getOperand().isFI()) return false;` This statement checks if the operand at position `` of the `Tail` instruction is a FI (Floating-point Immediate) operand. If it is, the function returns `false`." Compiler Type,Target,Idx,Des LLVM,RISCV,3605,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet without knowing the specific values of the variables and the behavior of the functions being called. However, based on the structure of the code, it appears that the next statement will be the `return` statement at the end of the `switch` block." LLVM,RISCV,3606,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be the continuation of the inner loop, which is iterating over the instructions in the current basic block. The loop variable `HiLUI` is of type `MachineInstr&`, and the loop body is likely to access and manipulate the instruction pointed to by `HiLUI`. Therefore, the next statement of this code snippet is likely to be: `HiLUI->getOpcode() == LLVM::Instruction::Load`" LLVM,RISCV,3607,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `for (auto *MI : DeadInstrs) MI->eraseFromParent();` This line of code is part of the `for` loop that iterates over the `DeadInstrs` vector, which contains pointers to machine instructions that are no longer needed and can be removed from the program. The `eraseFromParent()` method is called on each instruction pointer to remove it from its parent basic block." LLVM,RISCV,3608,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `DeadInstrs` class and the `MRI` object. However, based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the next statement will be a call to the `replaceRegWith` method of the `MRI` object, passing in the result of the `getReg` method called on the `Tail` object as the first argument, and the result of the `getReg` method called on the `LoADDI` object as the second argument. Here" LLVM,RISCV,3609,"The next statement of this code snippet is: LoADDI.getOperand(0).setOffset(Offset);" LLVM,RISCV,3610,"The next statement of the code snippet is: `Offset = SignExtend64 < > ( OffsetTail . getOperand ( ) . getImm ( ) << ) ;` This statement is part of the `else if` block, which is executed if the opcode of the `OffsetTail` instruction is equal to ``. The statement assigns the value of the immediate operand of the `OffsetTail` instruction to the `Offset` variable, after sign" LLVM,RISCV,3611,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `Offset = SignExtend64 < > ( OffsetTail . getOperand ( ) . getImm ( ) << ) ;` This statement is assigning the value of the immediate operand of the `OffsetTail` instruction to the `Offset` variable, after sign-extending it to a 64-bit integer. The `SignExtend64` function is used to perform the sign extension, and the ` : { int64_t Offset = Tail . getOperand ( ) . getImm ( ) ; LLVM_DEBUG ( dbgs ( ) << << Tail ) ; foldOffset ( HiLUI , LoADDI , Tail , Offset ) ; return true ; } break ;` This is a case statement that matches a string literal, which is denoted by ``. The statement inside the case block" LLVM,RISCV,3614,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `if (Tail.getOperand().isFI()) return false;` This statement checks if the operand at position `` of the `Tail` instruction is a FI (Floating-Point Immediate) operand. If it is, the function returns `false`." LLVM,RISCV,3615,"The code snippet you provided is a C++ function that appears to be part of a compiler or interpreter. It is checking the operands of a load instruction to see if they match certain conditions. The function takes a `LoADDI` object as an argument, which represents a load instruction. It then checks the opcode of the load instruction to see if it is a string literal. If it is not, the function returns `false`. If the opcode is a string literal, the function then checks the operands of the load instruction to see if they match certain conditions. It checks the target flags of" LLVM,RISCV,3616,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `MergeBaseOffsetOpt` class and the context in which this code is being executed. However, based on the name of the class and the fact that it is being instantiated and returned, it is likely that the next statement will involve the use of the `MergeBaseOffsetOpt` object in some way, such as calling a method on it or passing it as an argument to another method." LLVM,RISCV,3617,"Based on the code snippet provided, it appears to be a part of a larger function that is trying to optimize the use of certain instructions in a machine code. The code is checking the opcode of the instruction and then performing different actions based on the opcode. The next statement of the code snippet is: case : { int64_t Offset = Tail . getOperand ( ) . getImm ( ) ; LLVM_DEBUG ( dbgs ( ) << << Tail ) ; fold" LLVM,RISCV,3618,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `ImmOp.setOffset(Offset);`" LLVM,RISCV,3619,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be a call to the `getOperand()` method of the `LoADDI` object, passing in the operand number ``. This is because the previous line of code sets `LoADDI` to the result of the `use_begin()` method of the `HiLUI` object, which is a `MachineInstr` object. The `use_begin()` method returns an iterator to the first use of the instruction, and the `getOperand()` method is used to retrieve the operand at the specified index." LLVM,RISCV,3620,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `DeadInstrs.insert(&Tail);` This statement inserts the `Tail` instruction into the `DeadInstrs` set, which is a set of instructions that are no longer needed and can be removed from the program. The `insert` method is called on the `DeadInstrs` set, passing in the address of the `Tail` instruction as an argument. This indicates that the `Tail` instruction is no longer needed and can be removed from the program." LLVM,RISCV,3621,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the code depends on the specific implementation of the `DeadInstrs` class and the state of the `Tail` object. However, based on the name of the method being called (`insert`), it is likely that the next statement will be an insertion of the `Tail` object into the `DeadInstrs` collection." LLVM,RISCV,3622,"return ""MyPass"";" LLVM,RISCV,3623,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be: `int64_t OffHi = AddiImmOp . getImm ( ) ;` This is because the code is checking the immediate value of the `addi` instruction, which is represented by the `AddiImmOp` operand. The `getImm` method is used to retrieve the immediate value, and the `OffLo` and `OffHi` variables are likely to be used to store the low and high parts of the immediate value, respectively." LLVM,RISCV,3624,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return false;` Explanation: The `MergeBaseOffsetOpt` function is a machine function pass that is used to optimize the base offset of a merge instruction. The function takes no arguments and returns a boolean value indicating whether the optimization was successful. In this code snippet, the function is defined with an empty body, so the next statement is the `return` statement, which returns `false` to indicate that the optimization was not successful." LLVM,RISCV,3625,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return false;` Explanation: The `MergeBaseOffsetOpt` function is a machine function pass that is used to optimize the base offset of a merge instruction. The function takes no arguments and returns a boolean value indicating whether the optimization was successful. In this code snippet, the function is defined with an empty body, so the next statement is the `return` statement, which returns `false` to indicate that the optimization was not successful." LLVM,RISCV,3626,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `MadeChange |= detectAndFoldOffset(HiLUI, *LoADDI);` This line of code is part of a loop that iterates over the machine instructions in a basic block, and it calls the `detectAndFoldOffset` function on each instruction that is a `LUI` instruction followed by an `ADDI` instruction. The `detectAndFoldOffset` function is not defined in the code snippet, so it is not possible to determine its exact behavior. However, based on the name of the function," LLVM,RISCV,3627,"The next statement after the `for` loop is: `LLVM_DEBUG(dbgs() << << MadeChange << );` This statement is printing the value of the `MadeChange` variable to the debug stream, along with some surrounding text. The `` placeholders are replaced with the actual string literals, which are not shown in the code snippet." LLVM,RISCV,3628,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be a return statement, as the `getPassName()` function is expected to return a string value. The return statement is likely to be `return _OPTIMIZE_VSETVL_USES_NAME;`, where `` is a placeholder for the actual ISA name. Therefore, the next statement of this code snippet is likely to be a return statement that returns the string value `_OPTIMIZE_VSETVL_USE" LLVM,RISCV,3629,"return ""MyPass"";" LLVM,RISCV,3630,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return . contains ( Reg1 , Reg2 ) || . contains ( Reg1 , Reg2 ) ;` This statement is a return statement that returns the result of the `contains` method of the `STR_LIT` object, which is a string literal. The `contains` method checks if the string literal contains the specified substring. In this case, the substring is `Reg1` and `Reg2`. If the string literal contains both `Reg1` and `Reg2`, the" LLVM,RISCV,3631,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return . contains ( Reg1 , Reg2 ) || . contains ( Reg1 , Reg2 ) ;` This statement is a return statement that returns the result of the `contains` method of the `STR_LIT` object, which is a string literal. The `contains` method checks if the string literal contains the specified substring. In this case, the substring is `Reg1` and `Reg2`. If the string literal contains both `Reg1` and `Reg2`, the" LLVM,RISCV,3632,"Based on the code snippet provided, it is difficult to predict the next statement with certainty. However, based on the context and the fact that the code appears to be related to optimization, it is likely that the next statement will be related to optimization or performance tuning. Some possible next statements could include: * A call to a function that performs optimization or performance tuning, such as `OptimizeVSETVLUses` or `OptimizeVSETVL`. * A statement that sets a flag or variable related to optimization or performance tuning, such as `IsOptim" LLVM,RISCV,3633,"Based on the code snippet provided, it is difficult to predict the next statement with certainty. However, based on the context and the fact that the code appears to be related to optimization, it is likely that the next statement will be related to optimization or performance tuning. Some possible next statements could include: * A call to a function that performs optimization or performance tuning, such as `OptimizeVSETVLUses` or `OptimizeVSETVL`. * A statement that sets a flag or variable related to optimization or performance tuning, such as `IsOptim" LLVM,RISCV,3634,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be a call to the `getVRegDef` method of the `MachineRegisterInfo` class, passing in the register number of the copy source operand as an argument. The purpose of this call is to retrieve the definition of the register that the copy source operand refers to, so that the code can determine whether the copy instruction is redundant or not." LLVM,RISCV,3635,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet without knowing the context and the purpose of the code. However, based on the syntax and the structure of the code, it appears to be a part of a function that is checking the operands of an instruction and performing some operations on them. The code is using the LLVM API to access and manipulate the operands of an instruction. It is checking the opcode of the instruction and the registers used by the operands, and it is also using the `isSameRegisterClass` function to check if the registers used by the operands are the same" LLVM,RISCV,3636,"The next statement of this code snippet is: return new PulpHWLoopsPass();" LLVM,RISCV,3637,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific values of the variables and the behavior of the functions called. However, based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the next statement will be: `LoopSetup = &MI;` This is because the `if` statement that follows the code snippet you provided is checking if the `LoopSetup` variable is not null, and if the `MI` variable's `getOpcode()` method returns a specific value. If these conditions are met, then the `LoopSetup` variable will be set" LLVM,RISCV,3638,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet without knowing the context and the purpose of the code. However, based on the syntax and the name of the method being called, it appears that the code is adding a required dependency to a machine dominator tree. Here are a few possibilities for what the next statement could be: 1. Adding a new node to the tree: The code could be adding a new node to the tree, which would require the tree to be updated to reflect the new node. 2. Updating the tree structure: The code could be updating the tree structure to reflect" LLVM,RISCV,3639,"The next statement after the code snippet you provided is likely to be the implementation of the `getAnalysisUsage` function, which is a member function of the `MachineFunctionPass` class. The `getAnalysisUsage` function is used to specify the analysis passes that are required by the current pass. In this case, the `MachineDominatorTree` analysis pass is required, so the `getAnalysisUsage` function will likely include a call to `AU.addRequired()` to add the `MachineDominatorTree` analysis pass to the list of required passes" LLVM,RISCV,3640,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the context in which the code is being executed. However, based on the syntax and the fact that the code is using the `return` keyword, it is likely that the next statement will be the value that is being returned by the function. In this case, the function is returning the value of the `PULP_HWLOOPS_NAME` variable, which is likely to be a string or a character array. The exact value of this variable will depend on the specific implementation of the function and the" Compiler Type,Target,Idx,Des LLVM,RISCV,3641,"The next statement of the code snippet is: `BuildMI( *Preheader, Setup, Setup->getDebugLoc(), TII->get( ) ) .addImm( LoopNum ) .addReg( count ) .addSym( LastInstrSymbol );` This statement is part of the `if` block that checks if `Setup->getOpcode() == `. If this condition is true, then the `BuildMI` function is called with the appropriate arguments to create a new machine instruction. The `addImm" LLVM,RISCV,3642,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `PulpHWLoops` pass and the input machine code it is operating on. However, based on the name of the pass and the fact that it is a machine function pass, it is likely that the next statement will be related to the optimization or transformation of a machine function. Some possible next statements could include: * `PulpHWLoops::runOnFunction()`: This method is called by the pass manager to run the pass on a specific function." LLVM,RISCV,3643,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `PulpHWLoops` pass and the input machine code it is operating on. However, based on the name of the pass and the fact that it is a machine function pass, it is likely that the next statement will be related to the optimization or transformation of a machine function. Some possible next statements could include: * `PulpHWLoops::runOnFunction()`: This method is called by the pass manager to run the pass on a specific function." LLVM,RISCV,3644,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be the body of the `ProcessHardwareLoop` function, which is called with the values from the `Setups`, `Branches`, and `LoopNums` vectors as arguments. The function is likely to perform some processing on the hardware loop, such as generating code for the loop or updating the dominator tree." LLVM,RISCV,3645,"The next statement of this code snippet is: return new RedundantCopyEliminationPass();" LLVM,RISCV,3646,"The next statement after the code snippet you provided is likely to be a method call to the `RedundantCopyElimination` object that was just created. The method call will likely be a call to the `eliminateRedundantCopies` method, which is a method of the `RedundantCopyElimination` class. Here is an example of what the next statement might look like: ``` return new RedundantCopyElimination().eliminateRedundantCopies(); ``` This statement creates a new `RedundantCopyElimination" LLVM,RISCV,3647,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be a return statement, as the `getPassName()` function is expected to return a string value. The `` placeholder is a hint that the function should return a string literal, but the actual value returned will depend on the specific implementation of the function." LLVM,RISCV,3648,The next statement after `return ;` would be the end of the function. LLVM,RISCV,3649,"The next statement after the code snippet you provided is likely to be a return statement, as it is the last statement in the function. The `MachineFunctionProperties` object is being modified by setting the `NoVRegs` property to `true`. This means that the function will not use any virtual registers. The `set` method is being used to modify the `MachineFunctionProperties` object, and the `Property` enum is being used to specify the property to be modified. The `NoVRegs` property is being set to `true`, which means that the function will not use any virtual" LLVM,RISCV,3650,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return true;` Explanation: The code snippet is checking if the `Opc` variable is equal to a specific string literal (``) and if the `MI` object's `getOperand()` method returns a value that is equal to another specific string literal (``). If both conditions are true, the code returns `true`. If either condition is false, the code returns `false`. Therefore, the next statement of this code snippet is `return true;`, which" LLVM,RISCV,3651,The next statement after the `if` block is `return false;`. LLVM,RISCV,3652,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific values of the variables and the behavior of the functions called. However, based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the next statement will be: `if ( MI -> modifiesRegister ( TargetReg , TRI ) ) break ;` This statement checks if the current instruction modifies the target register, and if so, it breaks out of the loop. If the target register is not modified, the loop continues to the next instruction." LLVM,RISCV,3653,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `RedundantCopyElimination` pass and the input code being analyzed. However, based on the name of the pass and the fact that it is a machine function pass, it is likely that the next statement will involve analyzing and optimizing the machine code for the function being processed. Some possible next statements could include: * Analyzing the function's control flow graph to identify redundant copies and eliminate them. * Using data flow analysis to identify and eliminate redundant" LLVM,RISCV,3654,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return Changed;` The `runOnMachineFunction` function is a member function of the `RedundantCopyElimination` class, and it is called on a `MachineFunction` object. The function first checks if the function should be skipped by calling the `skipFunction` function, and if it should be skipped, it returns `false`. Otherwise, it initializes the `TRI` and `MRI` variables, and then iterates over the basic blocks of the machine function using a range-based for loop. For each" LLVM,RISCV,3655,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `TargetRegisterInfo` class and the `GenRegisterBankInfo` class. However, based on the names of the classes and the constructor signature, it is likely that the next statement will be a call to the `TargetRegisterInfo` constructor to initialize the `TRI` object. Here is an example of what the next statement might look like: ``` TargetRegisterInfo TRI(/* constructor arguments */); ``` It is important to note that the exact implementation of the" LLVM,RISCV,3656,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `TargetRegisterInfo` class and the `GenRegisterBankInfo` class. However, based on the names of the classes and the constructor signature, it is likely that the next statement will be a call to the `TargetRegisterInfo` constructor to initialize the `TRI` object. Here is an example of what the next statement might look like: ``` TargetRegisterInfo TRI(/* constructor arguments */); ``` It is important to note that the exact implementation of the" LLVM,RISCV,3657,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `TargetRegisterInfo` class and the `RegisterBankInfo` constructor. However, based on the name of the constructor and the parameter it takes, it is likely that the next statement will be an initialization of the `RegisterBankInfo` object using the `TargetRegisterInfo` object passed as a parameter. Here is a possible next statement: ``` m_tri = TRI; ``` This statement initializes the `m_tri` member variable of the `Register" LLVM,RISCV,3658,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `TargetRegisterInfo` class and the `RegisterBankInfo` constructor. However, based on the name of the constructor and the parameter it takes, it is likely that the next statement will be an initialization of the `RegisterBankInfo` object using the `TargetRegisterInfo` object passed as a parameter. Here is a possible next statement: ``` m_tri = TRI; ``` This statement initializes the `m_tri` member variable of the `Register" LLVM,RISCV,3659,"The next statement of this code snippet is: return &MF.getRegClass(Kind); Explanation: The `getPointerRegClass` method is overridden from the `TargetRegisterClass` class, and it is used to get the register class for a pointer of a specific kind. The `MF` parameter is a reference to the `MachineFunction` object, which contains information about the machine code being generated. The `Kind` parameter is an integer that specifies the kind of pointer (e.g., 32-bit, 64-bit, etc" LLVM,RISCV,3660,"The next statement of this code snippet is: return &MF.getRegClass(Kind); Explanation: The `getPointerRegClass` method is overridden from the `TargetRegisterClass` class, and it is used to get the register class for a pointer of a specific kind. The `MF` parameter is a reference to the `MachineFunction` object, which contains information about the machine code being generated. The `Kind` parameter is an integer that specifies the kind of pointer (e.g., 32-bit, 64-bit, etc" LLVM,RISCV,3661,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `MachineFunction` class and the `requiresFrameIndexScavenging` method. However, based on the name of the method and the context in which it is being called, it is likely that the next statement will check whether the `MachineFunction` object requires frame index scavenging, and return a boolean value indicating the result of this check." LLVM,RISCV,3662,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `Offset = ;` This statement assigns the value of `` to the variable `Offset`. The value of `` is not specified in the code snippet, so it could be any integer value." LLVM,RISCV,3663,"Based on the code snippet you provided, it appears to be a method that returns a value based on the target ABI and whether the target has certain extensions. The method first checks if the target has the `stdExtD` extension, and if so, returns `CSR_XLEN_F64_Interrupt_SaveList`. If the target does not have `stdExtD`, it then checks if the target has the `stdExtF` extension, and if so, returns `CSR_XLEN_F32_Interrupt_SaveList`. If neither of these conditions" LLVM,RISCV,3664,"The next statement in the code snippet is: `return CSR_Interrupt_SaveList;` This is because the `if` statements before it are not true, so the code will execute the `return` statement at the end of the function." LLVM,RISCV,3665,"The next statement of this code snippet is: return CSR_Interrupt_RegMask; Explanation: The code snippet is a part of a function that returns a register mask based on the target ABI. The function first checks the default case, which is an unreachable statement, and then checks the other cases. If the target ABI is not one of the cases, the function returns the default register mask. If the target ABI is one of the cases, the function returns the corresponding register mask for that ABI." LLVM,RISCV,3666,"Based on the code snippet you provided, it appears to be a part of a larger function that is trying to determine the mask of registers that need to be preserved during a function call, based on the target architecture and the calling convention used. The code is using a number of template metaprogramming techniques to generate the mask, based on the target architecture and the calling convention. It is also using the `llvm_unreachable` function to indicate that certain branches of the code should not be reachable. Without more context, it is difficult to predict exactly what the next statement of the" LLVM,RISCV,3667,"The next statement after the given code snippet is: `return Reserved;` The `markSuperRegs` function is called three times, each time with a different set of arguments. The first two calls mark the reserved registers for the current function, and the third call marks the reserved registers for the function that contains the current function (if it exists). The `if` statement checks whether the current function has a frame pointer, and if so, marks the reserved registers for the function that contains the current function. The `assert` statement checks that all super registers are marked, and the `return` statement returns" LLVM,RISCV,3668,"The next statement after the given code snippet is: `return Reserved;` The `markSuperRegs` function is called three times, each time with a different set of arguments. The first two calls mark the reserved registers for the current function, and the third call marks the reserved registers for the function that contains the current function (if it exists). The `if` statement checks whether the current function has a frame pointer, and if so, marks the reserved registers for the function that contains the current function. The `assert` statement checks that all super registers are marked, and the `return` statement returns" LLVM,RISCV,3669,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `Offset = ;` This statement assigns the value of `` to the variable `Offset`." LLVM,RISCV,3670,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet without knowing the specific values of the variables and the behavior of the functions being called. However, based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the next statement will be a call to the `BuildMI` function, which is used to build a machine instruction. The function takes several arguments, including a pointer to a `MachineInstr` object, a `BasicBlock` object, a `DataLayout` object, a `TargetInstrInfo` object, and a register. The function returns a `MachineInstr` object, which is then used to modify" LLVM,RISCV,3671,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific values of the variables and the implementation of the `getLargestLegalSuperClass` method. However, based on the code snippet, it appears that the method is trying to find the largest legal superclass of a given register class. The method takes two parameters: `RC`, which is a pointer to a `TargetRegisterClass` object, and a reference to a `MachineFunction` object. The method first checks if `RC` is equal to a specific register class (represented by `<" LLVM,RISCV,3672,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return RC;`" LLVM,RISCV,3673,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the values of the variables and the specific implementation of the `DIExpression` class. However, based on the code snippet, it appears that the next statement will be one of the following: * `Ops.push_back(dwarf::DW_OP_constu)` * `Ops.push_back(dwarf::DW_OP_bregx)` * `Ops.push_back(dwarf::DW_OP_mul)`" LLVM,RISCV,3674,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be: Ops.push_back(dwarf::DW_OP_plus); Explanation: The code snippet is pushing various DWARF operations onto a vector called ""Ops"". The last operation pushed onto the vector is DW_OP_bregx, which takes three arguments: the register number, the offset, and the size of the operation. The next operation that is likely to be pushed onto the vector is DW_OP_plus, which adds the top two values on the stack and pushes" LLVM,RISCV,3675,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return MF.getSubtargetSubtarget>().hasStdExtC() ? NUM_LIT : NUM_LIT;` This is a ternary operator expression that returns the result of the `hasStdExtC()` method of the `Subtarget` object, which is obtained by calling the `getSubtarget()` method on the `MF` object. The `ISA_LIT` and `NUM_LIT` placeholders are replaced with the appropriate values at runtime." LLVM,RISCV,3676,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return MF.getSubtargetSubtarget>().hasStdExtC() ? NUM_LIT : NUM_LIT;` This is a ternary operator expression that returns the result of the `hasStdExtC()` method of the `Subtarget` object, which is obtained by calling the `getSubtarget()` method on the `MF` object. The `ISA_LIT` and `NUM_LIT` placeholders are replaced with the appropriate values at runtime." LLVM,RISCV,3677,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `markSuperRegs` function and the values of the variables `Reserved` and `Reg`. However, based on the code snippet provided, it is likely that the next statement will be a call to the `markSuperRegs` function with the `Reserved` and `Reg` variables as arguments." LLVM,RISCV,3678,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `markSuperRegs` function and the values of the variables `Reserved`, `MF`, and `TFI`. However, based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the next statement will be a call to the `markSuperRegs` function with the arguments `Reserved` and ``." LLVM,RISCV,3679,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `FrameIdx = FII->second;` Explanation: The code snippet is a part of a function that is checking if a certain register is a fixed CSR (Control and Status Register) and if it is, it sets the `FrameIdx` variable to the corresponding value. The first part of the code checks if the `useSaveRestoreLibCalls` function is enabled for the current machine function. If it is not, the function returns `false`. The second part of the code uses the `find" LLVM,RISCV,3680,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific values of the variables and the behavior of the functions called. However, based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the next statement will be: `Reserved.set(Reg, true);` This is because the `markSuperRegs` function is called with the `Reserved` bit vector and the current register `Reg` as arguments, and it is likely that this function sets the corresponding bit in the `Reserved` bit vector to `true` if the register is reserved by the" LLVM,RISCV,3681,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet without knowing the specific implementation of the `MF` class and the `getSubtarget` method. However, based on the syntax and the context, it appears that the next statement is likely to be a call to a method on the `Subtarget` object returned by `getSubtarget`. The `getSubtarget` method is called with a template argument of `ISA_LIT` and a parameter of `Subtarget`, which suggests that it is a method that returns a `Subtarget` object for a specific instruction set architecture (ISA" LLVM,RISCV,3682,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `markSuperRegs` function and the values of the variables `Reserved`, `TFI`, and `MF`. However, based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the next statement will be a call to the `checkAllSuperRegsMarked` function, which is likely to check whether all super registers have been marked." LLVM,RISCV,3683,"The next statement after the given code snippet is: `return Reserved;` This is because the code snippet is part of a function that returns a value of type `Reserved`, and the `return` statement is used to return that value." LLVM,RISCV,3684,"The next statement of the code snippet is likely to be a `case` statement, as the code is checking the opcode of the machine instruction and performing different actions based on the opcode. The `case` statement is used to compare the opcode with a specific value and execute the code inside the statement if the opcode matches the value. In this case, the code is checking the opcode of the machine instruction and performing different actions based on the opcode. The `case` statement is used to compare the opcode with a specific value and execute the code inside the statement if the opcode matches the value" LLVM,RISCV,3685,"Based on the code snippet you provided, it appears that the `switch` statement is checking the target ABI of the subtarget and returning a register mask based on the ABI. The `default` case is unreachable, so it will never be executed. The first `case` statement checks if the target ABI is ``. If it is, the function returns `CSR_ILP32_LP64_RegMask`. The second `case` statement checks if the target ABI is ``. If it is" LLVM,RISCV,3686,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific values of the variables and the behavior of the `markSuperRegs` function. However, based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the next statement will be: `markSuperRegs(Reserved, )` This is because the `for` loop is currently iterating over the registers, and the `markSuperRegs` function is being called with the `Reserved` bit vector and the current register as arguments. The next iteration of the loop will" LLVM,RISCV,3687,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet without knowing the specific values of the variables and the context in which the code is being executed. However, based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the next statement will be: `BuildMI(MBB, II, DL, TII->get(ScalableAdjOpc), VL) .addReg(FrameReg, getKillRegState(FrameRegIsKill)) .addReg(ScalableFactorRegister, RegState::Kill);` This statement is part of the `else` block of the" LLVM,RISCV,3688,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `MI.getOperand(FIOperandNum).ChangeToRegister(FrameReg, false, false, FrameRegIsKill);`" LLVM,RISCV,3689,"The next statement in the code snippet is: `return CSR_ILP32_LP64_SaveList;`" LLVM,RISCV,3690,"The next statement in the code snippet is: return CSR_ILP32D_LP64D_RegMask;" LLVM,RISCV,3691,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return TFI -> getFPReg ( ) ;` Explanation: The code snippet is a ternary operator, which is a shorthand for an if-else statement. The condition is `TFI -> hasFP ( MF )`, which checks if the `MF` register has a floating-point value. If it does, the first expression `TFI -> getFPReg ( )` is evaluated and returned. If it doesn't, the second expression `TFI -> getSPReg ( )` is evaluated" LLVM,RISCV,3692,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific values of the variables and the behavior of the `markSuperRegs` function. However, based on the code snippet, it appears that the next statement will be a call to `markSuperRegs` with the `Reserved` bit vector and a register number or register name as arguments. The `Reserved` bit vector is initialized with the number of registers returned by `getNumRegs()`, and the loop iterates over the registers and calls `markSuperRegs` for each reserved register. The" LLVM,RISCV,3693,"This code snippet is defining a constructor for a class called `RegisterInfo`. The constructor takes a single argument, `STI`, which is an object of type `Subtarget`. The constructor initializes the `RegisterInfo` object with the values of various members of `STI`, such as `STI.getTargetABI()`, `STI.getHwMode()`, and other members. It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet without knowing the context in which it is being used. However, based on the information provided, it appears that the constructor is setting up the `Register" LLVM,RISCV,3694,"This code snippet is defining a constructor for a class called `RegisterInfo`. The constructor takes a single argument, `STI`, which is an object of type `Subtarget`. The constructor initializes the `RegisterInfo` object with the values of various members of `STI`, such as `STI.getTargetABI()`, `STI.getHwMode()`, and other members. It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet without knowing the context in which it is being used. However, based on the information provided, it appears that the constructor is setting up the `Register" LLVM,RISCV,3695,"The next statement after the given code snippet is: `return FrameIdx;` Explanation: The code snippet checks if the `useSaveRestoreLibCalls` method of the `RVFI` object returns `false`, and if so, returns `false`. Otherwise, it tries to find the `Reg` key in the `FixedCSRFIMap` map using the `find` method. If the key is not found, the method returns `false`. If the key is found, the method assigns the value of the `second` field of the `FII`" LLVM,RISCV,3696,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet without knowing the specific implementation of the `MachineFunctionInfo` class and the `getInfo` method. However, based on the syntax and the fact that the `RVFI` variable is declared as a pointer to a `MachineFunctionInfo` object, it is likely that the next statement will be a call to a method or function that takes a `MachineFunctionInfo` object as an argument. Without more information, it is not possible to provide a more specific answer. If you have access to the implementation of the `MachineFunctionInfo` class and" LLVM,RISCV,3697,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `Offset = ;` This is a simple assignment statement that sets the value of the `Offset` variable to a specific integer value. The value of `` is not specified in the code snippet, so it could be any integer value." LLVM,RISCV,3698,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be: `TII->movImm(MBB, II, DL, ScratchReg, Offset);` This is because the previous statement in the code snippet is `if (!isInt(Offset)) {`, which checks if the `Offset` variable is not an integer with the specified number of bits (`NUM_LIT`). If this condition is true, the code inside the `if` statement will be executed, which includes the `TII->movImm` function call. The `T" LLVM,RISCV,3699,The next statement after the `if` block will be `FrameIdx = FII->second;`. LLVM,RISCV,3700,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `FrameIdx = FII->second;` Explanation: The code snippet is checking if the `useSaveRestoreLibCalls` method of the `RVFI` object returns `true`. If it does, the code returns `false`. Otherwise, it checks if the `Reg` variable is present in the `FixedCSRFIMap` map. If it is not, the code returns `false`. If it is, the code assigns the value of the `second` field of the `FII` object to the" LLVM,RISCV,3701,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific values of the variables and the behavior of the functions called. However, based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the next statement will be: `TII->movImm(MBB, II, DL, ScratchReg, Offset);` This is because the code checks if `Offset` is not an integer less than or equal to `NUM_LIT`, and if it is not, it asserts that `Offset` is an integer less than or equal to" LLVM,RISCV,3702,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet without knowing the specific values of the variables and the behavior of the functions being called. However, based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the next statement will be: `BuildMI(MBB, II, DL, TII->get(), ScratchReg).addReg(FrameReg).addReg(ScratchReg, RegState::Kill);` This statement is creating a new machine instruction using the `BuildMI` function, which is a member of the `MachineInstr`" LLVM,RISCV,3703,"The code snippet you provided is a part of the LLVM compiler infrastructure, specifically the part that deals with generating code for a specific target architecture. The `getCallPreservedMask` function is a member function of the `RegisterInfo` class, which is responsible for returning a bitmask of registers that are preserved across function calls for a particular target architecture. The function takes two parameters: `MF`, which is a reference to a `MachineFunction` object, and `CC`, which is a value of the `CallingConv::ID` enumeration that represents the calling convention used by the function" LLVM,RISCV,3704,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return TFI->hasFP(MF) ? : ;` This statement is a ternary operator that returns the result of the `hasFP` method of the `TargetFrameLowering` object `TFI`, which is called on the `MachineFunction` object `MF`. If the result is true, the statement returns the value of ``. Otherwise, it returns the value of ``." LLVM,RISCV,3705,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `markSuperRegs` function and the values of the variables `Reserved`, `TFI`, and `MF`. However, based on the syntax and the context of the code, it is likely that the next statement will be a call to the `checkAllSuperRegsMarked` function, which appears to be a function that checks whether all super registers have been marked. Here is a possible next statement: ``` checkAllSuperRegsMarked(Reserved);" LLVM,RISCV,3706,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return FII->second;`" LLVM,RISCV,3707,"The next statement after the `if` statement would be the statement inside the `if` block, which is `return false;`." LLVM,RISCV,3708,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `RegisterInfo` class and the `MachineFunction` class. However, based on the name of the method and the parameters it takes, it is likely that the next statement will be a check to determine whether the given physical register is clobberable by the assembly code. Here are a few possibilities for what the next statement could be: 1. A check to see if the physical register is already clobbered by the assembly code. If it is, the method could return" LLVM,RISCV,3709,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the `isConstantPhysReg` method depends on the implementation of the `RegisterInfo` class and the specific values of the `PhysReg` parameter. However, based on the name of the method and the fact that it is a member of the `RegisterInfo` class, it is likely that this method is used to determine whether a given physical register is a constant register. In this case, the next statement of the code snippet would likely be a check to see if the `PhysReg` parameter is a" LLVM,RISCV,3710,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific values of the variables and the implementation of the `isConstantPhysReg` method. However, based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the method is checking if the `PhysReg` parameter is equal to a specific constant value. If the `PhysReg` parameter is equal to this constant value, the method will return `true`, otherwise it will return `false`. Therefore, the next statement of this code snippet is likely to be a comparison between the `PhysReg` parameter and the constant" LLVM,RISCV,3711,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be: `TII->movImm(MBB, II, DL, FrameReg, Offset);` This statement is a call to the `movImm` method of the `TII` object, which is an instance of the `InstrInfo` class. The method is used to move an immediate value into a register, and it takes several parameters: * `MBB`: The machine basic block in which the instruction is being generated. * `II`: The machine instruction being generated." LLVM,RISCV,3712,"Based on the code snippet provided, it is difficult to predict the next statement with certainty. However, we can make an educated guess based on the patterns and conventions used in the code. The code appears to be checking the target architecture and ABI of the system, and returning a list of registers that need to be saved based on the target. The `Subtarget` object is being used to determine the target architecture and ABI, and the `hasStdExtV` method is being used to check for the presence of certain extensions. Based on this information, it is likely that the next" LLVM,RISCV,3713,"Based on the code snippet you provided, it appears to be related to register allocation for a machine function in LLVM. The method `getCalleeSavedRegs` is being implemented, which returns a list of callee-saved registers for a given machine function. The code is checking the target ABI of the subtarget to determine which list of callee-saved registers to return. If the target ABI is not recognized, the method will call `llvm_unreachable`, which is a function that is intended to be called only when a particular code path is not supposed to be reach" LLVM,RISCV,3714,"Based on the code snippet you provided, it appears that the next statement will be: return CSR_ILP32F_LP64F_RegMask; The code is checking if the subtarget has the stdExtV and stdExtF extensions, and if so, it returns the corresponding register mask. If neither of those extensions are present, it falls through to the switch statement, which is checking the target ABI. The default case is unreachable, so the only other possible cases are the two string literals." LLVM,RISCV,3715,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `MachineInstr` and `MachineFunction` classes, as well as the values of the variables and constants used in the code. However, based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the next statement will be a call to the `getFrameLowering` method of the `TargetFrameLowering` class, passing in the `MachineFunction` object as an argument. This method will return a `FrameLowering` object that represents the frame lowering for the current function." LLVM,RISCV,3716,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be: `MI.getOperand(FIOperandNum).ChangeToRegister(FrameReg, false);` This is because the previous statement `Offset += MI.getOperand(FIOperandNum + ).getImm();` is likely to be executed before the current statement, and the `ChangeToRegister` method is called on the operand with the index `FIOperandNum` to change it to a register operand." LLVM,RISCV,3717,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet without knowing the specific implementation of the `getCalleeSavedRegs` function and the context in which it is being called. However, based on the name of the function and the parameters it takes, it is likely that it returns a list of registers that are saved by the callee (i.e., the function being called) before it returns. In this case, the `getCalleeSavedRegs` function is being called on an object of type `RegisterInfo`, which is likely a class that represents a register in the" LLVM,RISCV,3718,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific values of the variables and the behavior of the `markSuperRegs` function. However, based on the code snippet provided, it is likely that the next statement will be another call to `markSuperRegs`, as there are multiple calls to this function in the code snippet. The first call to `markSuperRegs` is made with two arguments: `Reserved` and ``. The second call to `markSuperRegs` is made with the same two arguments." LLVM,RISCV,3719,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific values of the variables and the behavior of the functions called. However, based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the next statement will be: `markSuperRegs(Reserved, )` This is because the previous statement in the loop is `markSuperRegs(Reserved, )` and the loop continues until `Reg` is less than `getNumRegs()`. The loop increments `Reg` by 1 each iteration" LLVM,RISCV,3720,"Based on the code snippet you provided, it appears to be a part of a larger function that is trying to determine the callee-saved registers for a given machine function. The code is using a number of template parameters and member functions that are not defined in the code snippet you provided, so it is difficult to predict exactly what the next statement will be. However, based on the context, it seems likely that the next statement will be a return statement that returns a list of callee-saved registers." LLVM,RISCV,3721,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return CSR_Interrupt_RegMask;` This is because the `if` statement that checks for the presence of the `FnAttribute` is not satisfied, so the code falls through to the `return` statement at the end of the function." LLVM,RISCV,3722,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `if ( ! MI . isDebugValue ( ) && ! isInt < > ( Offset ) ) {` This statement checks if the current instruction is not a debug value and if the offset is not an integer with a specific value (represented by ``). If this condition is true, the code inside the if statement will be executed." LLVM,RISCV,3723,"Based on the code snippet, it appears that the next statement will be: `IsKill = (FrameReg == );` The code is checking if the `FrameReg` variable is equal to a specific string literal, which is assigned to the `FrameReg` variable in the previous line of code. If the `FrameReg` variable is equal to the string literal, then the `IsKill` variable will be set to `true`." LLVM,RISCV,3724,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `int FrameIndex = MI.getOperand(FIOperandNum).getIndex();`" LLVM,RISCV,3725,"The next statement of this code snippet will be: `return CSR_RV64_SaveList;` This is because the `if` statement checks if the `Subtarget` is RV64 and has D or F extensions. If it does not have either of these extensions, it will return the `CSR_RV64_SaveList`." LLVM,RISCV,3726,"The next statement after the `if` block will be executed if the condition `Subtarget.isRV64()` is true and `Subtarget.hasD()` is also true. Therefore, the next statement will be: ``` return CSR_RV64D_SaveList; ```" LLVM,RISCV,3727,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `else if ( Subtarget . hasD ( ) ) return CSR_RV32D_RegMask ;` This statement is executed if the `Subtarget` object has the `D` property, which means that the target architecture is 64-bit with double-precision floating-point support. In this case, the function returns the `CSR_RV32D_RegMask` value, which is a bitmask that indicates the presence of the `D` register in the target architecture." LLVM,RISCV,3728,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return TFI->hasFP(MF) ? (Subtarget.isRV64() ? : ) : (Subtarget.isRV64() ? : );` This statement is a ternary operator that returns a value based on the result of the `hasFP` method called on the `TFI` object, which is an instance of the `TargetFrameLowering` class. If the result of `has" LLVM,RISCV,3729,"Based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the `getReservedRegs` method is being called on an object of type `RegisterInfo`, and the method is returning a `BitVector` object that represents the reserved registers for a particular machine function. The `BitVector` object is initialized with the number of registers in the machine function, and then two registers are set to reserved using the `set` method. The two registers that are being set to reserved are not specified in the code snippet, so it is not possible to predict the next statement of the code snippet. It is worth noting" LLVM,RISCV,3730,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it appears to be a fragment of a larger program and the context is not provided. However, based on the syntax and the fact that the code is using the `Reserved` class, it is likely that the next statement will also be a call to the `set` method of the `Reserved` class, passing in a string literal as an argument." LLVM,RISCV,3731,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `RegisterInfo :: RegisterInfo ( const Subtarget & STI ) : GenRegisterInfo ( ) , Subtarget ( STI ) {` This is a constructor for the `RegisterInfo` class, which is a subclass of `GenRegisterInfo`. The constructor takes a `const Subtarget&` reference as an argument, which is used to initialize the `Subtarget` member variable of the" LLVM,RISCV,3732,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `RegisterInfo :: RegisterInfo ( const Subtarget & STI ) : GenRegisterInfo ( ) , Subtarget ( STI ) {` This is a constructor for the `RegisterInfo` class, which is a subclass of `GenRegisterInfo`. The constructor takes a `const Subtarget&` reference as an argument, which is used to initialize the `Subtarget` member variable of the" LLVM,RISCV,3733,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `TargetRegisterClass` and `MachineFunction` classes, as well as the value of the `Kind` parameter. However, based on the name of the function and the parameters it takes, it is likely that the next statement will be a call to a method of the `TargetRegisterClass` class that returns a pointer to a register class. The `getPointerRegClass` method is likely to be a method that returns a pointer to the register class that is used for pointers of the specified" LLVM,RISCV,3734,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `markSuperRegs` and `checkAllSuperRegsMarked` functions, as well as the values of the `Reserved` variable and the string literals. However, based on the names of the functions and the context of the code, it is likely that the next statement will be a call to the `checkAllSuperRegsMarked` function, which will check whether all of the super registers have been marked. If all of the super registers have been marked, the" LLVM,RISCV,3735,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `markSuperRegs` function and the values of the variables `Reserved`, `TFI`, and `MF`. However, based on the context and the names of the variables, it is likely that the next statement will be a call to the `checkAllSuperRegsMarked` function, which will check whether all super registers have been marked. Here is a possible sequence of statements: 1. `markSuperRegs(Reserved, movImm32(MBB, II, DL, ScratchReg, Offset);` This is because the previous statement, `BuildMI(MBB, II, DL, TII->get(), ScratchReg).addReg(FrameReg).addReg(ScratchReg, RegState::Kill);`, is a function call that takes `ScratchReg` as an argument, and the next statement is likely to be the next instruction in" LLVM,RISCV,3738,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be a return statement, as the function `getCalleeSavedRegs` is a `const` member function and does not modify any member variables. The function `getCalleeSavedRegs` is a getter function that returns a pointer to a `MCPhysReg` object, which is a member variable of the `RegisterInfo` class. The function takes a `const MachineFunction*` pointer as an argument, which is used to retrieve the callee-saved registers for the current function. The function first checks if the current" LLVM,RISCV,3739,"Based on the code snippet you provided, it appears that the `getCalleeSavedRegs` function is trying to determine which registers need to be saved in the callee-saved register list for a given machine function. The function first checks if the function has the `fnAttribute` attribute set to a specific value (represented by ``). If it does, then the function checks if the subtarget has the `StdExtD` or `StdExtF` extension. If the subtarget has `StdExtD`, then the function returns `CSR" LLVM,RISCV,3740,"The next statement of this code snippet is: return CSR_XLEN_F64_Interrupt_RegMask;" LLVM,RISCV,3741,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return CSR_Interrupt_RegMask;` This is because the `if` statements are evaluated in order, and if the first `if` statement is not true, the second `if` statement is not evaluated. Therefore, the `return` statement at the end of the code snippet is executed, and the value of `CSR_Interrupt_RegMask` is returned." LLVM,RISCV,3742,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the code depends on the specific implementation of the `RegisterInfo` class and the values of the variables used in the code. However, based on the name of the method and the fact that it is declared as a `const` method, it is likely that the method returns a pointer to a bitmask that indicates which registers are preserved across a function call. The bitmask is likely to be stored in a static variable within the `RegisterInfo` class, and the method returns a pointer to that variable." LLVM,RISCV,3743,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `markSuperRegs` and `checkAllSuperRegsMarked` functions, as well as the values of the `Reserved` variable and the `` constants. However, based on the names of the functions and the fact that the code is checking whether all super registers have been marked, it is likely that the next statement will be a call to a function that checks whether all super registers have been marked, such as `checkAllSuperRegsMarked`." LLVM,RISCV,3744,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the `isConstantPhysReg` method depends on the specific implementation of the `RegisterInfo` class and the value of the `PhysReg` parameter. However, based on the name of the method and the parameter, it is likely that the method checks whether the given physical register is a constant register. If the `PhysReg` parameter is equal to the constant register, the method will return `true`, otherwise it will return `false`. Therefore, the next statement of this code snippet is likely" LLVM,RISCV,3745,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific values of the variables and the logic of the program. However, based on the syntax and the context, it is likely that the next statement will be an assignment or a comparison of some kind." LLVM,RISCV,3746,"Based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the next statement will be the initialization of the `RegisterInfo` object with the values provided in the constructor. The constructor takes an `unsigned HwMode` parameter, which is used to initialize the `HwMode` member variable of the `RegisterInfo` object. The constructor also initializes the `Name` member variable with the value of the `STR_LIT` macro, the `Size` member variable with the value of the `NUM_LIT` macro, and the `Offset` member variable with the value of the `NUM_LIT" LLVM,RISCV,3747,"Based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the next statement will be the initialization of the `RegisterInfo` object with the values provided in the constructor. The constructor takes an `unsigned HwMode` parameter, which is used to initialize the `HwMode` member variable of the `RegisterInfo` object. The constructor also initializes the `Name` member variable with the value of the `STR_LIT` macro, the `Size` member variable with the value of the `NUM_LIT` macro, and the `Offset` member variable with the value of the `NUM_LIT" LLVM,RISCV,3748,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be the implementation of the `trackLivenessAfterRegAlloc` function, which is a member function of the `MachineFunction` class. The function takes a `const MachineFunction &` parameter, which is a reference to a `MachineFunction` object. The function returns a `bool` value, which indicates whether the liveness of registers should be tracked after register allocation. The function is marked as `const` because it does not modify the state of the `MachineFunction` object. It is also marked as `override` because it overrides" LLVM,RISCV,3749,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be the implementation of the `trackLivenessAfterRegAlloc` function, which is a member function of the `MachineFunction` class. The function takes a `const MachineFunction &` parameter, which is a reference to a `MachineFunction` object. The function returns a `bool` value, which indicates whether the liveness of registers should be tracked after register allocation. The function is marked as `const` because it does not modify the state of the `MachineFunction` object. It is also marked as `override` because it overrides" LLVM,RISCV,3750,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet without knowing the context and the data structures being used. However, based on the syntax and the variable names, it appears that the code is iterating over a set of blocks (MBB) and checking if the VSETVLI (Vector Setup for Vector Load/Store Instruction) of each block is the same as the VSETVLI of the previous block. If the VSETVLI is the same, the code adds the block to a list of redundant VSETVLI blocks. If the VSETVLI is different, the code breaks out" LLVM,RISCV,3751,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `firstEffectiveVSETVLI = &(*instr);` Explanation: The code snippet is iterating over the instructions in a machine basic block (MBB) using a `for` loop. The loop variable `instr` is an iterator over the instructions in the MBB. The loop body checks each instruction to see if it is a `vsetvli` instruction (using the `isVsetvli` function). If the current instruction is a `vsetvli` instruction, the code sets the `first" LLVM,RISCV,3752,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `if (firstEffectiveVSETVLI == nullptr) firstEffectiveVSETVLI = &(*instr);` This statement checks if the `firstEffectiveVSETVLI` pointer is null, and if so, it sets it to point to the current instruction." LLVM,RISCV,3753,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the `collectRedundancyVSETVLIInMF` function is not specified. However, based on the name of the function, it appears to be related to the collection of redundancy information for a machine function. Given the context of the code snippet, it is likely that the next statement after the call to `collectRedundancyVSETVLIInMF` will be related to the processing of the collected redundancy information. This could involve updating the machine function's redundancy information" LLVM,RISCV,3754,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the code depends on the specific implementation of the `MachineFunction` class and the data stored in the `MF` object. However, based on the name of the function and the fact that it is iterating over the elements of `MF`, it is likely that the next statement will be related to the processing of the current element of `MF`. Without more information about the specific implementation of the `MachineFunction` class and the data stored in `MF`, it is not possible to" LLVM,RISCV,3755,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be the definition of the `create` function, which is a factory function that creates an instance of the `ISA_LIT` class. The `create` function takes no arguments and returns a pointer to a `FunctionPass` object. Here is an example of what the `create` function might look like: ``` FunctionPass * createRemoveRedundancyVSETVLPass ( ) { return new ISA_LIT::RemoveRedundancyVSETVLPass(); } ```" LLVM,RISCV,3756,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `FunctionPass` class and the `create` method. However, based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the `create` method is intended to create a new instance of the `RemoveRedundancyVSETVL` class, which is a subclass of `FunctionPass`. Therefore, the next statement of this code snippet is likely to be a call to the constructor of the `RemoveRedundancyVSETVL` class, which is not shown in the code snippet" LLVM,RISCV,3757,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `ISA_LIT` macro and the `_VECTOR_REMOVE_REDUNDANCY_VSETVL` function. However, based on the naming conventions used in the code snippet, it is likely that the next statement will be a call to the `_VECTOR_REMOVE_REDUNDANCY_VSETVL` function, which is likely to be a function that removes redundancy from a vector. The" LLVM,RISCV,3758,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `ISA_LIT` macro and the `_VECTOR_REMOVE_REDUNDANCY_VSETVL` function. However, based on the naming conventions used in the code snippet, it is likely that the next statement will be a call to the `_VECTOR_REMOVE_REDUNDANCY_VSETVL` function, which is likely to be a function that removes redundancy from a vector. The" LLVM,RISCV,3759,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `if (order) {`" LLVM,RISCV,3760,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the code depends on the input parameters and the specific implementation of the `MachineInstr` class. However, based on the name of the function and the fact that it is checking for a specific condition, it is likely that the next statement will be a conditional statement, such as an `if` or `else` statement, that will execute different code based on the result of the check. Without more information about the specific implementation of the `MachineInstr` class and the input parameters, it is" LLVM,RISCV,3761,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be a comparison of the `opcode` field of the `instr` object with a specific value. The value is not explicitly specified in the code snippet, but it is likely to be a constant or a variable that represents a valid opcode for the `isVsetvli` instruction. The `isVsetvli` instruction is a V-extension instruction that is used to set the V-extension vector length. The `opcode` field of the `instr` object is used to determine the opcode of the instruction, and the `" LLVM,RISCV,3762,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `redundancyVSETVLI.clear();`" LLVM,RISCV,3763,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the code is not complete and the function `collectRedundancyVSETVLIInMF` is not defined. Additionally, the code snippet is not in a standard programming language, so it is not possible to determine the intended behavior of the code. However, based on the name of the function, it is possible that the function is intended to collect redundant information in a data structure or database. The function may take a parameter `MF` which represents a data structure or database, and the function may iterate through the data" LLVM,RISCV,3764,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet without knowing the specific implementation of the `runOnMachineFunction` function and the context in which it is being called. However, based on the name of the function and the fact that it is a member of the `ISA_LIT` class, it is likely that the next statement will be related to the removal of redundant instructions or the optimization of the machine code generated by the compiler. Some possible next statements could include: * Checking the machine code for redundant instructions and removing them * Identifying opportunities for instruction combining or other optim" LLVM,RISCV,3765,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific values of the variables and the context in which the code is being executed. However, based on the information provided, it is likely that the next statement will be: `pos += 1;` This is because the code is using the `pos` variable to index into the `immediates` array, and it is likely that the next statement will increment the `pos` variable to move to the next element in the array." LLVM,RISCV,3766,"The next statement of this code snippet is: return new RI5CYIRPass();" LLVM,RISCV,3767,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return new RI5CYIR ( ) ;` This statement creates a new instance of the `RI5CYIR` class and returns it as the result of the `createRI5CYIRPass` function." LLVM,RISCV,3768,The next statement after `return ;` would be the end of the function. LLVM,RISCV,3769,The next statement after the `if ( status == AFTER )` block will be `} else if ( status == AFTER ) {`. LLVM,RISCV,3770,"The next statement of the code snippet is: `if (setcc_inner.getOperand().getOpcode() == ) {` This is a conditional statement that checks if the operand at position `` of the `setcc_inner` node has an opcode that is equal to ``. If this condition is true, then the code inside the `if` block will be executed." LLVM,RISCV,3771,"The next statement in the code snippet is likely to be the initialization of the `type` field of the `Metadata` class with the value passed in the `t` parameter. Here's the predicted next statement: ``` type = t; ```" LLVM,RISCV,3772,"The next statement in the code snippet is likely to be the initialization of the `type` field of the `Metadata` class with the value passed in the `t` parameter. Here's the predicted next statement: ``` type = t; ```" LLVM,RISCV,3773,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the code is incomplete and the context is not provided. However, based on the syntax and the fact that the code is inside a function, it is likely that the next statement will be a return statement or a call to another function." LLVM,RISCV,3774,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the `runOnFunction` method depends on the specific implementation of the `RI5CYIR` class and the input function `F`. However, based on the name of the method and the class, it is likely that the method is intended to perform some kind of analysis or transformation on the input function, and the next statement may be related to that analysis or transformation." LLVM,RISCV,3775,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `errs() << ""Transforming bit manipulation in function "" << F.getName().str() << ""..."";` This statement is using the `errs()` function to print a message to the console, indicating that the `transformBitManipulation()` function is being applied to the function `F`. The message includes the name of the function being transformed, which is obtained using the `getName()` method of the `Function` class." LLVM,RISCV,3776,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `limit_l = immediate / 2;` Explanation: The code snippet is part of a function that transforms bit manipulation instructions in a function. The function iterates over the basic blocks and instructions in the function, and for each instruction, it checks if it is an AND instruction. If it is, it gets the operands of the instruction and checks if they are constant integers. If they are, it calculates the limited value of the operands and checks if they are equal to a specific value. If they are not, it" LLVM,RISCV,3777,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet without knowing the specific values of the variables and constants used in the code. However, based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the code is checking if the value of `immediate` is equal to a specific value (represented by ``), and if it is, it is printing a message (represented by ``). If the value of `immediate` is not equal to the specific value, the code is continuing to the next iteration of the loop." LLVM,RISCV,3778,"The next statement of this code snippet is: * `dag = NULL;` This statement sets the `dag` pointer to `NULL`, indicating that the object has been deleted." LLVM,RISCV,3779,"The next statement after the `if` statement would be the statement inside the `if` block, which is `delete dag;`." LLVM,RISCV,3780,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `Args.push_back(Entry);` Explanation: The code snippet defines a function named `callFunction` that takes several parameters, including a `SDValue` object named `Chain`, a `const char*` named `fnName`, and several other `SDValue` objects. The function appears to be related to code generation for a specific instruction set architecture (ISA). The function body defines several local variables, including `Ctx`, which is a reference to the context of the `DAG` object, and `STI" LLVM,RISCV,3781,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet without knowing the context and the specific implementation of the `EmitTargetCodeForMemOp` function. However, based on the name of the function and the parameters passed to it, it appears to be related to generating code for a memory operation. The function takes several parameters, including `DAG`, `dl`, `Chain`, `Dst`, `Src`, `Size`, `Alignment`, `isVolatile`, `MustPreserveCheriCapabilities`, `DstPtrInfo`, and `SrcPtrInfo`. These parameters likely correspond" LLVM,RISCV,3782,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return callFunction(DAG, dl, Chain, memFnName, Dst, Src, Size);` This statement calls the `callFunction` function with the specified arguments, which are: * `DAG`: The data-flow graph. * `dl`: The data-layout. * `Chain`: The chain of instructions. * `memFnName`: The name of the memory function to call. * `Dst`: The destination address. * `Src`: The source address. *" LLVM,RISCV,3783,"The next statement after the given code snippet is likely to be the assignment of the result of the `getAddrSpaceCast` method to the `Dst` or `Src` variable, depending on the value of the `DstAS` or `SrcAS` variable, respectively. Here's a possible completion of the code snippet: ``` if (DstAS == ) { Dst = DAG.getAddrSpaceCast(dl, CapType, Dst, , ); }" LLVM,RISCV,3784,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `const Subtarget & getSubtarget ( SelectionDAG & DAG ) { return reinterpret_cast < const Subtarget & > ( DAG . getSubtarget ( ) ) ;` This statement is a function definition that returns a reference to a constant `Subtarget` object. The function takes a `SelectionDAG` object and a `DAG` object as arguments. The function uses a `reinter" LLVM,RISCV,3785,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the program depends on the input data and the specific implementation of the `SelectionDAG` and `Subtarget` classes. However, based on the code snippet you provided, it appears that the `getSubtarget` function is intended to retrieve a reference to a `Subtarget` object that is associated with a particular `SelectionDAG` object. The function takes a `SelectionDAG` object as an argument and returns a reference to a `Subtarget` object." LLVM,RISCV,3786,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `~ SelectionDAGInfo ( ) {` This is the destructor of the `SelectionDAGInfo` class, which is called when an object of this class is destroyed. The destructor is responsible for releasing any resources that the object may have acquired during its lifetime, such as memory or file handles." LLVM,RISCV,3787,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `~ SelectionDAGInfo ( ) {` This is the destructor of the `SelectionDAGInfo` class, which is called when an object of this class is destroyed. The destructor is responsible for releasing any resources that the object may have acquired during its lifetime, such as memory or file handles." LLVM,RISCV,3788,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be: `const MachineInstr *UserOp = &MI;` This is because the `reg_operands` method of `MachineRegisterInfo` returns a list of `MachineInstr` objects that use the specified register, and the `getOperand` method of `MachineInstr` returns the operand at the specified index. In this case, the operand at index `` is a register operand, so `getReg` is called on it to get the register. The `reg_operands` method" LLVM,RISCV,3789,"This code snippet appears to be a switch statement in a programming language. The `case` keyword is used to indicate a specific value that the switch statement should handle. The `` placeholders represent string literals, which are used to specify the value that the switch statement should handle. Based on the information provided, it is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty. However, it is likely that the next statement will be another `case` statement or a `default` statement. The `default` statement is used to handle any value that is not explicitly handled" LLVM,RISCV,3790,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific values of the string literals and the return values of the functions. However, based on the syntax and structure of the code, it appears that the next statement will be a case statement with a string literal as the condition. The case statement will likely return a string literal or call a function that returns a string literal." LLVM,RISCV,3791,"Based on the code snippet you provided, it appears to be a part of a function that is checking the operands of a machine instruction. The function is checking if the operands are registers and if they are virtual registers. The next statement of the code snippet you provided is: `if ( MI -> getOpcode ( ) == ) { E = MI -> getNumOperands ( ) ; D = ; }` This statement is checking if the opcode of the machine instruction is equal to a specific value (represented by" LLVM,RISCV,3792,"Based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the next statement will be: `if ( !MI->getOperand(I).isReg() ) return false;` This statement is checking if the operand at index `I` is a register, and if it is not, the function will return `false`." LLVM,RISCV,3793,"Based on the code snippet you provided, it appears to be a part of a function that is processing a worklist of machine instructions. The function is checking each instruction in the worklist to see if it is a sign-extending operation, and if so, it is pushing the defining instruction for the source register onto the worklist. The next statement in the code snippet is: case : { Register SrcReg = MI -> getOperand ( ) . getReg ( ) ; if ( ! SrcReg . isVirtual (" LLVM,RISCV,3794,"Based on the code snippet you provided, it appears to be a part of a function that is checking the operands of a machine instruction. The function is returning `true` or `false` based on certain conditions. The next statement in the code snippet is: ``` case : return MI.getOperand().getImm() >= ; ``` This statement is checking if the immediate value of the operand at index `` is greater than or equal to `" LLVM,RISCV,3795,"Based on the code snippet you provided, it appears to be a switch statement that is checking the operands of a machine instruction. The switch statement is checking the operands of the instruction against a set of predetermined values, and returning a boolean value based on the result of the check. The next statement in the code snippet would be the first case statement, which checks if the operand is a string literal. If the operand is a string literal, the case statement would return true. If the operand is not a string literal, the code would move on to the next case statement and check if the" LLVM,RISCV,3796,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `SExtWRemoval` class and the context in which the code is being executed. However, based on the name of the class and the fact that it is being instantiated and returned, it is likely that the next statement will involve the use of the `SExtWRemoval` object to perform some kind of operation on the data." LLVM,RISCV,3797,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be a return statement, as the `getPassName()` function is expected to return a string value. The `` placeholder is a hint that the function should return a string literal, but the actual value returned will depend on the specific implementation of the function." LLVM,RISCV,3798,"return ""MyPass"";" LLVM,RISCV,3799,"It's difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific values of the variables and the behavior of the functions called. However, based on the code structure, it appears that the next statement will be the start of a new case label, possibly `case :`." LLVM,RISCV,3800,"Based on the code snippet you provided, it appears to be a part of a function that is checking the operands of a machine instruction. The function is checking if the operands are registers and if they are virtual registers. If they are not virtual registers, the function returns false. The next statement of the code snippet you provided is: `if ( MI -> getOpcode ( ) == ) { E = MI -> getNumOperands ( ) ; D = ; }` This statement is checking if the opcode of the machine" LLVM,RISCV,3801,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific inputs and the behavior of the `MI` object. However, based on the pattern of the code, it appears that the next statement will be a `case` statement with a string literal as the condition. The code is checking the operands of a machine instruction (`MI`) and comparing them to various constants. The `case` statements are checking the values of the operands and returning a boolean value based on the comparison. The constants used in the comparisons are all strings, except for one case where a" LLVM,RISCV,3802,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `SExtWRemoval` function and the `MachineFunctionPass` class. However, based on the name of the function and the fact that it is a pass for a machine function, it is likely that the next statement will be related to the removal of sign extensions on the machine function. Here are a few possibilities for what the next statement could be: * A call to a function that removes sign extensions from the machine function, such as `RemoveSignExtensions`. * A" LLVM,RISCV,3803,"The next statement in the code snippet is: `initializeSExtWRemovalPass(PassRegistry::getPassRegistry());` This statement initializes the `SExtWRemovalPass` class, which is a subclass of `MachineFunctionPass`. The `initialize` method is called with the `PassRegistry` object as an argument, which is used to register the pass with the pass manager." LLVM,RISCV,3804,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet without knowing the specific context and inputs that are being used. However, based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the next statement will be: `MRI.replaceRegWith(DstReg, SrcReg);` This statement is likely to replace the value of the destination register with the value of the source register." LLVM,RISCV,3805,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet without knowing the specific implementation of the `bindsLocally` function and the `Reloc` class. However, based on the name of the function and the parameters it takes, it appears to be a function that determines whether a global value (represented by the `GV` parameter) is bound locally or not, based on the relocation model (represented by the `RM` parameter). Without knowing the specific implementation of the function, it is difficult to predict the next statement of the code snippet. However, some possible next" LLVM,RISCV,3806,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the code depends on the specific implementation of the `FrameLowering` class and the input data. However, based on the syntax and the context in which the code is used, it is likely that the next statement will be a call to the `FrameLowering` class's `lower()` method, which will perform the actual frame lowering operation." LLVM,RISCV,3807,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the program depends on the specific implementation of the `TargetFrameLowering` class and the values of the variables used in the program. However, based on the name of the method `getFrameLowering`, it is likely that this method is intended to return an instance of the `TargetFrameLowering` class, which is a subclass of the `FrameLowering` class. The `FrameLowering` class is a base class that provides a common interface for different types of frame lowering, and the `" LLVM,RISCV,3808,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the code depends on the specific inputs and the implementation of the `InstrInfo` class. However, based on the syntax and the fact that the code is returning a reference to an object, it is likely that the next statement will be a statement that uses the returned reference to access or modify the `InstrInfo` object. Without more context or information about the specific implementation of the `InstrInfo` class, it is not possible to provide a more specific prediction of the next statement." LLVM,RISCV,3809,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the program depends on the specific implementation of the `getRegisterInfo` function and the values of the variables used in the function. However, based on the name of the function and the return type, it is likely that the function returns a pointer to a `RegisterInfo` object that represents a register in the ISA. The `const` keyword in the function signature suggests that the function does not modify the state of the object it is called on, and the `getRegisterInfo` name suggests that the function is" LLVM,RISCV,3810,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the program depends on various factors, including the input data and the specific implementation of the `TargetSelectionDAGInfo` class. However, based on the name of the method and the fact that it is declared as a `const` method, it is likely that the method returns a constant reference to a `TargetSelectionDAGInfo` object, which is a member of the class. Therefore, the next statement of this code snippet is likely to be a call to a method of the `TargetSelection" LLVM,RISCV,3811,"The next statement after the `if` block is the `ParseSubtargetFeatures` function call. The `ParseSubtargetFeatures` function takes two arguments: the first is the CPU name, and the second is the feature set. In this case, the CPU name is `CPUName`, which is either the value of the `CPU` variable or the string literal `` if the `CPU` variable is empty. The feature set is `FS`. The `ParseSubtargetFeatures` function is not defined in the code snippet you provided, so it is not possible" LLVM,RISCV,3812,"The next statement after the `if` block is `ParseSubtargetFeatures(CPUName, FS);`." LLVM,RISCV,3813,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return bindsLocally(GV, RM);` The `isPC32DBLSymbol` function checks if the given global value `GV` is a 32-bit PC-relative symbol that can be represented as a direct branch instruction. If the alignment of `GV` is equal to ``, it means that the symbol is not a direct branch instruction, so the function returns `false`. If the code model is `CodeModel::Small`, the function checks if the symbol binds locally using the `bind" LLVM,RISCV,3814,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be: `return TargetTriple.isOSBinFormatELF();` This statement is a method call on the `TargetTriple` object, which is a member of the `const` keyword. The method being called is `isOSBinFormatELF`, which is a method that returns a boolean value indicating whether the target triple is an ELF binary format. The return value of this method is then returned by the `isTargetELF` function." LLVM,RISCV,3815,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return TargetTriple.isOSBinFormatELF();` This statement is a method call that returns a boolean value indicating whether the target triple is in the ELF binary format." LLVM,RISCV,3816,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be the initialization of the `InstrInfo` member variable, which is a `RISCVInstrInfo` object. The `initializeSubtargetDependencies` function is called to initialize the `InstrInfo` object with the appropriate values for the `CPU` and `FS` parameters. Here is the predicted next statement: ``` InstrInfo = RISCVInstrInfo(initializeSubtargetDependencies(CPU, FS)); ```" LLVM,RISCV,3817,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be the initialization of the `InstrInfo` member variable, which is a `RISCVInstrInfo` object. The `initializeSubtargetDependencies` function is called to initialize the `InstrInfo` object with the appropriate values for the `CPU` and `FS` parameters. Here is the predicted next statement: ``` InstrInfo = RISCVInstrInfo(initializeSubtargetDependencies(CPU, FS)); ```" LLVM,RISCV,3818,"The next statement of this code snippet is: return UseSoftFloat;" LLVM,RISCV,3819,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be the return value of the `EnableLinkerRelax` function, which is a boolean value indicating whether the linker relaxation is enabled or not." LLVM,RISCV,3820,The next statement after `return true ;` would be the end of the function or method. LLVM,RISCV,3821,The next statement after `return EnableRVCHintInstrs;` would be the end of the function. LLVM,RISCV,3822,The next statement after `return EnableRVCHintInstrs;` would be the end of the function. LLVM,RISCV,3823,"The next statement after `return EnableSaveRestore` would be the end of the function, as there are no more statements after that line." LLVM,RISCV,3824,"The next statement after `return EnableUnalignedScalarMem` would be the next statement after the `if` block. Since there is no `else` block, the next statement would be the statement after the `if` block. Assuming that the `if` block is not executed, the next statement would be: ``` return EnableUnalignedScalarMem; ``` This statement would return the value of `EnableUnalignedScalarMem` to the caller." LLVM,RISCV,3825,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `enableUnalignedScalarMem` function. However, based on the name of the function, it is likely that it returns a boolean value indicating whether unaligned scalar memory access is enabled or not." LLVM,RISCV,3826,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return hasVInstructionsI64() ? : ;` This is a ternary operator, which is a shorthand for an if-else statement. The condition `hasVInstructionsI64()` is evaluated, and if it is true, the first `` is returned. If it is false, the second `` is returned." LLVM,RISCV,3827,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the code depends on the specific inputs and the implementation of the `InstrInfo` class. However, based on the syntax and the fact that the code is returning a reference to an object, it is likely that the next statement will be a statement that uses the returned reference to access or modify the `InstrInfo` object. Without more context or information about the specific implementation of the `InstrInfo` class, it is not possible to provide a more specific prediction of the next statement." LLVM,RISCV,3828,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the code depends on the specific inputs and the implementation of the `InstrInfo` class. However, based on the syntax and the fact that the code is returning a reference to an object, it is likely that the next statement will be a statement that uses the returned reference to access or modify the `InstrInfo` object. Without more context or information about the specific implementation of the `InstrInfo` class, it is not possible to provide a more specific prediction of the next statement." LLVM,RISCV,3829,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the `getMaxInterleaveFactor()` function is not specified. However, based on the name of the function, it is likely that it returns the maximum interleave factor that is supported by the device. Without knowing the specific implementation of the function, it is difficult to make any further predictions about the behavior of the code." LLVM,RISCV,3830,"The next statement of this code snippet is: return ;" LLVM,RISCV,3831,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the `getMaxVLen` function is not specified. However, based on the name of the function and the fact that it is a member function of a class, it is likely that the function returns the maximum value that can be stored in a vector of the class. Therefore, the next statement of this code snippet could be: ``` return maxVLen; ``` However, without more information about the class and the implementation of the `getMaxVLen` function, it is not possible" LLVM,RISCV,3832,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the program depends on the values of the variables and the specific implementation of the `getMinVLen` function. However, based on the code snippet provided, it is likely that the next statement will be a return statement, as the `getMinVLen` function is declared as a `const` function and does not modify any of the variables in the code snippet. Therefore, it is likely that the function will return a value based on the values of the variables in the code snippet." LLVM,RISCV,3833,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the program depends on the specific values of the variables and the implementation of the `ProcFamily` class. However, based on the syntax and the fact that the `ProcFamily` class is being returned, it is likely that the next statement of the code will be the end of the function or method that contains this code snippet." LLVM,RISCV,3834,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the program depends on the specific values of the variables and the implementation of the `ProcFamily` class. However, based on the syntax and the fact that the `ProcFamily` class is being returned, it is likely that the next statement of the code will be the end of the function or method that contains this code snippet." LLVM,RISCV,3835,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the `getRealMaxVLen` function is not specified. However, based on the name of the function and the context in which it is used, it is likely that it returns the maximum real vector length that can be used with the RVV vector size in bits. Therefore, the next statement of this code snippet is likely to be a call to the `getMaxRVVVectorSizeInBits` function, which is used to determine the maximum vector size in bits that can be used with" LLVM,RISCV,3836,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the code depends on the specific implementation of the `TSInfo` class and the context in which the code is executed. However, based on the syntax and the fact that the code is returning a reference to an object, it is likely that the next statement after this code snippet will be a statement that uses the returned reference to access or modify the `TSInfo` object. For example, the next statement might be something like: ``` TSInfo->someMethod(); ``` This would call the" LLVM,RISCV,3837,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the code depends on the specific implementation of the `TSInfo` class and the context in which the code is executed. However, based on the syntax and the fact that the code is returning a reference to an object, it is likely that the next statement after this code snippet will be a statement that uses the returned reference to access or modify the `TSInfo` object. For example, the next statement might be something like: ``` TSInfo->someMethod(); ``` This would call the" LLVM,RISCV,3838,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be the return statement, which returns a pointer to the `TargetLowering` object that is stored in the `TLInfo` variable. Here's a breakdown of the code snippet: * `const TargetLowering * getTargetLowering ( ) const override`: This is a member function that returns a pointer to a `TargetLowering` object. The `const` keyword indicates that the function does not modify the object it is called on. The `` template parameter is a placeholder for" LLVM,RISCV,3839,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be the return statement, which returns a pointer to the `TargetLowering` object that is stored in the `TLInfo` variable. Here's a breakdown of the code snippet: * `const TargetLowering * getTargetLowering ( ) const override`: This is a member function that returns a pointer to a `TargetLowering` object. The `const` keyword indicates that the function does not modify the object it is called on. The `` template parameter is a placeholder for" LLVM,RISCV,3840,"The next statement of this code snippet is: return XLen;" LLVM,RISCV,3841,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `MVT` class and the `getXLenVT` method. However, based on the name of the method and the return type, it is likely that the method returns a value of type `VT` that represents the length of the `X` dimension of the `MVT` object." LLVM,RISCV,3842,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the code snippet is incomplete and does not provide enough context to determine the next statement. However, based on the syntax and structure of the code snippet, it is likely that the next statement will be a statement that assigns a value to the variable `XLenVT`. The `return` statement in the code snippet suggests that the function is returning a value, and the variable `XLenVT` is likely to be the value that is being returned. Without more information about the code snippet, it is not" LLVM,RISCV,3843,"The next statement of this code snippet is: return HasStdExtA;" LLVM,RISCV,3844,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the context in which the code is being executed and the values of the variables involved. However, based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the function `HasStdExtC` is being called and its return value is being returned by the function." LLVM,RISCV,3845,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the context in which the code is being executed and the values of the variables involved. However, based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the function `HasStdExtC` is being called and its return value is being returned by the function." LLVM,RISCV,3846,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the function is dependent on the specific implementation of the `hasStdExtF` function. However, based on the name of the function, it is likely that it returns a boolean value indicating whether the object has a standard extension." LLVM,RISCV,3847,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the function is dependent on the specific implementation of the `hasStdExtF` function. However, based on the name of the function, it is likely that it returns a boolean value indicating whether the object has a standard extension." LLVM,RISCV,3848,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the `hasStdExtM` function is not specified. However, based on the name of the function and the fact that it is a member function of a class, it is likely that it returns a boolean value indicating whether the class has a standard extension method." LLVM,RISCV,3849,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the context in which the code is being executed and the values of the variables involved. However, based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the function is returning a boolean value indicating whether the standard extension vector (StdExtV) is present or not." LLVM,RISCV,3850,"The next statement after `return HasStdExtZba ;` would be the end of the function. The `return` statement is used to return a value from a function, and it is typically the last statement in a function. In this case, the function `HasStdExtZba` is returning the value of `HasStdExtZba`, which is a boolean value indicating whether the CPU has the `ZBA` extension. Therefore, the next statement after `return HasStdExtZba ;` would be the end of the function, and there would be no further" LLVM,RISCV,3851,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the `hasStdExtZba` function is not specified. However, based on the name of the function and the fact that it is a member of the `bool` class, it is likely that the function returns a boolean value indicating whether the standard extension `Zba` is available or not." LLVM,RISCV,3852,"The next statement of this code snippet is: return HasStdExtZbb;" LLVM,RISCV,3853,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `HasStdExtZbb` function and the input parameters passed to it. However, based on the name of the function and the return type, it is likely that the function is checking if the standard extension `Zbb` is available on the current platform. If the extension is available, the function would return `true`, otherwise it would return `false`. Therefore, the next statement of this code snippet could be any statement that is executed after the function call, depending" LLVM,RISCV,3854,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `HasStdExtZbc` function. However, based on the name of the function, it is likely that it returns a boolean value indicating whether the standard extension `Zbc` is supported by the current platform." LLVM,RISCV,3855,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the code depends on the specific implementation of the `hasStdExtZbe` method and the data stored in the `this` object. However, based on the name of the method and the fact that it is declared as a `const` method, it is likely that the method will return a boolean value indicating whether the `this` object has a standard extension Zbe or not." LLVM,RISCV,3856,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the code depends on the specific implementation of the `hasStdExtZbf` method. However, based on the name of the method and the fact that it is declared as a `const` method, it is likely that the method returns a boolean value indicating whether the object has a standard extension ZBF." LLVM,RISCV,3857,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the context in which the code is being executed and the values of the variables involved. However, based on the syntax and the fact that the function `HasStdExtZbkb` is being returned, it is likely that the next statement will be a call to the function `HasStdExtZbkb`, possibly with some arguments." LLVM,RISCV,3858,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the code depends on the specific implementation of the `HasStdExtZbkc` function. However, based on the name of the function, it is likely that the next statement will be a return statement that returns the result of the `HasStdExtZbkc` function." LLVM,RISCV,3859,"The next statement of this code snippet is: return HasStdExtZbkx;" LLVM,RISCV,3860,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the code depends on the specific input and the implementation of the `HasStdExtZbkx` function. However, based on the name of the function, it is likely that the next statement will be a return statement that returns a value indicating whether the input has the standard extension `Zbkx`." LLVM,RISCV,3861,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `HasStdExtZbm` function and the input parameters passed to it. However, based on the name of the function and the context in which it is being used, it is likely that the next statement after `return HasStdExtZbm ;` will be a statement that uses the result of the `HasStdExtZbm` function to determine the next action to be taken. For example, the next statement might be a conditional statement that checks the return" LLVM,RISCV,3862,"The next statement of this code snippet is: return HasStdExtZbm;" LLVM,RISCV,3863,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the code depends on the specific implementation of the `hasStdExtZbp` method and the state of the object. However, based on the name of the method and the fact that it is declared as a `const` method, it is likely that the method returns a boolean value indicating whether the object has a standard extension Zbp or not." LLVM,RISCV,3864,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `HasStdExtZbp` function and the input parameters passed to it. However, based on the name of the function and the return type, it is likely that the function is checking if the standard extension `Zbp` is available on the current platform. If the function returns `true`, it means that the `Zbp` extension is available and can be used. If it returns `false`, it means that the `Zbp` extension is not available and cannot be used" LLVM,RISCV,3865,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the value of the `HasStdExtZbr` variable. However, based on the code snippet provided, it is likely that the next statement will be: `return HasStdExtZbr;` This is because the `hasStdExtZbr` function is declared as a `const` function, which means that it does not modify the state of the object it is called on. Therefore, it is likely that the function will simply return the value of the `HasStdExtZ" LLVM,RISCV,3866,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the `hasStdExtZbr` function is not specified. However, based on the name of the function, it is likely that it checks whether the current object has a standard extension Zbr. If the function is defined in the same class as the `hasStdExtZbr` function, it is possible that the next statement will be a call to the `hasStdExtZbr` function, passing the current object as an argument. For example: ``` bool hasStdExt" LLVM,RISCV,3867,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `HasStdExtZbt` function and the input data. However, based on the name of the function, it is likely that the next statement will be a check of the standard extension of the Zbt format." LLVM,RISCV,3868,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `HasStdExtZdinx` function and the input data. However, based on the name of the function, it is likely that the next statement will be a check to see if the `StdExtZdinx` field is present in the input data, and if so, return the value of that field." LLVM,RISCV,3869,"The next statement of this code snippet is the return statement, which returns the value of the variable `HasStdExtZfh`." LLVM,RISCV,3870,"The next statement of this code snippet is: return HasStdExtZfh;" LLVM,RISCV,3871,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `HasStdExtZfhmin` function and the input data. However, based on the name of the function, it is likely that it returns a boolean value indicating whether the input data has a standard extension or not. Therefore, the next statement of this code snippet could be any statement that is executed after the `HasStdExtZfhmin` function returns its value. It could be a conditional statement that checks the return value of the function, or it could" LLVM,RISCV,3872,"The next statement of this code snippet is: return HasStdExtZfhmin;" LLVM,RISCV,3873,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the code depends on the specific implementation of the `hasStdExtZfinx` method. However, based on the name of the method, it is likely that it returns a boolean value indicating whether the current object has a standard extension with the name ""Zfinx""." LLVM,RISCV,3874,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the code depends on the specific implementation of the `hasStdExtZhinx` method. However, based on the name of the method, it is likely that it returns a boolean value indicating whether the current object has a standard extension Zhinx." LLVM,RISCV,3875,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the `HasStdExtZhinx` variable is not specified. However, based on the syntax and the fact that the function returns a `bool`, it is likely that the next statement will be a comparison or assignment operation involving the `HasStdExtZhinx` variable." LLVM,RISCV,3876,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the program depends on various factors such as the input data, the specific implementation of the `hasStdExtZihintpause` function, and the overall control flow of the program. However, based on the name of the function and the fact that it is a member function of a class, it is likely that the function is used to check if a certain extension or feature is supported by the program. The function may return a boolean value indicating whether the extension or feature is supported or not. With" LLVM,RISCV,3877,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the program depends on the specific implementation of the `hasStdExtZknd` method and the state of the object on which it is called. However, based on the name of the method and the fact that it is a member function of a class, it is likely that the method is checking for the presence of a standard extension or feature in the object. The `const` keyword at the end of the function signature suggests that the method does not modify the state of the object. Without more" LLVM,RISCV,3878,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the code depends on the specific inputs and the implementation of the `HasStdExtZknd` function. However, based on the name of the function, it is likely that the next statement will be a return statement that returns the result of the `HasStdExtZknd` function." LLVM,RISCV,3879,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the code depends on the specific implementation of the `hasStdExtZkne` method. However, based on the name of the method and the fact that it is declared as a `const` method, it is likely that the method returns a boolean value indicating whether the object has a standard extension with the specified name." LLVM,RISCV,3880,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the program depends on various factors such as the input data, the specific implementation of the `hasStdExtZkr` function, and the environment in which the program is running. However, based on the name of the function `hasStdExtZkr`, it is likely that the function is checking whether the standard extension for the ZKR (Zero-Knowledge Proof) protocol is supported by the current platform. If the function returns `true`, it means that the standard extension is supported, and" LLVM,RISCV,3881,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `HasStdExtZksed` function and the input data. However, based on the name of the function, it is likely that the next statement will be a check to see if the input data has the standard extension `Zksed`. If the input data does not have this extension, the function may return an error or a default value." LLVM,RISCV,3882,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the code depends on the specific implementation of the `hasStdExtZksed` method and the state of the object. However, based on the name of the method and the fact that it is a member function of a class, it is likely that the method checks whether the object has a standard extension with the name ""Zksed"". If the object does not have such an extension, the method may return `false`. Therefore, the next statement of this code snippet could be any of the" LLVM,RISCV,3883,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the code depends on the specific implementation of the `hasStdExtZksh` method and the state of the object it is called on. However, based on the name of the method and the fact that it is declared as a `const` method, it is likely that the method returns a boolean value indicating whether the object has a standard extension for the `Zksh` format." LLVM,RISCV,3884,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the code depends on the specific input and the implementation of the `HasStdExtZksh` function. However, based on the name of the function, it is likely that the next statement will be a call to the `HasStdExtZksh` function, which will check if the standard extension `Zksh` is available on the system. If the function returns `true`, the next statement will likely be a call to the `Zksh` function, which will execute the code" LLVM,RISCV,3885,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the program depends on the value of the `HasStdExtZvfh` variable, which is not specified in the code snippet. However, based on the syntax and the fact that the function returns a `bool` value, it is likely that the next statement will be a return statement that returns the value of `HasStdExtZvfh`." LLVM,RISCV,3886,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the code depends on the specific implementation of the `hasStdExtZvfh` method and the state of the object. However, based on the name of the method and the fact that it is a `const` method, it is likely that the method returns a boolean value indicating whether the object has a standard extension with the name ""Zvfh""." LLVM,RISCV,3887,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the program depends on the specific implementation of the `hasVInstructions` method and the state of the object on which it is called. However, based on the name of the method and the fact that it is a member function of a class, it is likely that the method returns a boolean value indicating whether the object has any instructions that start with the letter ""V""." LLVM,RISCV,3888,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `HasStdExtZve32x` function and the input data. However, based on the name of the function, it is likely that it returns a boolean value indicating whether the input data has a standard extension for 32-bit integers." LLVM,RISCV,3889,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the program depends on the specific input and the implementation of the `hasVInstructionsAnyF` method. However, based on the name of the method, it is likely that it returns a boolean value indicating whether the current object has any instructions that match a certain criteria." LLVM,RISCV,3890,"The next statement of this code snippet is: return HasStdExtZve32f && HasStdExtF;" LLVM,RISCV,3891,"The next statement of this code snippet is: return HasStdExtZve64d && HasStdExtD; This statement is a return statement that returns the result of the logical AND operation between the two variables HasStdExtZve64d and HasStdExtD." LLVM,RISCV,3892,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the function is dependent on the specific implementation of the `hasVInstructionsI64` function. However, based on the name of the function, it is likely that it returns a boolean value indicating whether the current instruction is a `VInstruction` with a 64-bit operand." LLVM,RISCV,3893,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the code depends on the specific inputs and the implementation of the `HasStdExtZve64x` function. However, based on the name of the function, it is likely that the next statement will be a return statement that returns the result of the `HasStdExtZve64x` function." LLVM,RISCV,3894,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the `is64Bit()` function is not specified. However, based on the name of the function and the fact that it is a member of a class, it is likely that the function returns a boolean value indicating whether the current platform is 64-bit." LLVM,RISCV,3895,"The next statement of this code snippet is: return HasRV64;" LLVM,RISCV,3896,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be a comparison or a logical operation using the variables `i`, ``, and ``. Without more context, it is not possible to predict the exact statement." LLVM,RISCV,3897,The next statement after the `assert` statement is the `return` statement. The `return` statement returns the value of `UserReservedRegister[i]`. LLVM,RISCV,3898,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be the return value of the `IsRV32E` function, which is a boolean value indicating whether the current processor is in RV32E mode." LLVM,RISCV,3899,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the function is dependent on the specific implementation of the `isRV32E` function. However, based on the name of the function, it is likely that it is checking whether the current processor is in RV32E mode, which is a 32-bit embedded instruction set architecture. Therefore, the next statement of this code snippet could be any of the following: * A check to see if the current processor is in RV32E mode * A check to" LLVM,RISCV,3900,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be another `assert` statement, as this is a common pattern in this codebase. The first `assert` statement checks that `hasVInstructions()` returns `true` and that the string literal `` is not empty. The second `assert` statement checks that `RVVVectorLMULMax` is less than or equal to a certain number (represented by ``) and that it is a power of 2. Based on the structure of the code and the naming conventions" LLVM,RISCV,3901,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return PowerOf2Floor(Max);` Explanation: The code snippet first checks if `RVVVectorBitsMax` is greater than or equal to `RVVVectorBitsMin` and if the two string literals are equal. If the condition is true, it sets `Max` to the maximum of `RVVVectorBitsMin` and `RVVVectorBitsMax`. Then, it checks if `Max` is less than or equal to `32` or greater than `51" LLVM,RISCV,3902,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be a call to a function or method that takes the values of `RVVVectorBitsMin`, `NUM_LIT`, and `STR_LIT` as arguments. The function or method is not specified in the code snippet provided, so it is not possible to predict with certainty what the next statement will be. However, based on the syntax and structure of the code snippet, it appears that the next statement is likely to be a call to a function or method that performs some kind of validation or checking on the values of `RVVVector" LLVM,RISCV,3903,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the function is dependent on the implementation of the `hasStdExtB` function. However, based on the name of the function, it is likely that it returns a boolean value indicating whether the object has a standard extension B." LLVM,RISCV,3904,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `HasStdExtZbproposedc` function and the context in which the code is being executed. However, based on the code snippet provided, it is likely that the next statement after the `return` statement will be the closing brace (`}`) of the `hasStdExtZbproposedc` function." LLVM,RISCV,3905,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `HasStdExtZbproposedc` function and the context in which the code is being executed. However, based on the code snippet provided, it is likely that the next statement after the `return` statement will be the closing brace (`}`) of the `hasStdExtZbproposedc` function." LLVM,RISCV,3906,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `bool Is64Bit = TT.isArch64Bit();` This statement assigns the result of the `isArch64Bit()` method of the `Triple` class to the `Is64Bit` variable. The `isArch64Bit()` method returns a boolean value indicating whether the architecture is 64-bit or not." LLVM,RISCV,3907,"Based on the code snippet you provided, it appears that the next statement will be: `XLenVT = ;` This is because the previous statement ended with a semicolon, indicating that it is a complete statement. The next statement is a variable assignment, which is a common pattern in C++ code. The variable being assigned is `XLenVT`, and it is being assigned the value ``." LLVM,RISCV,3908,"The next statement after `return ! DisableUsingConstantPoolForLargeInts ;` is likely to be the end of the function or method, as the `return` statement is typically used to return a value from a function or method. In this case, the `return` statement is returning the negation of the value of the `DisableUsingConstantPoolForLargeInts` constant, which is likely to be a boolean value. The `!` operator is used to negate the value of the expression that follows it, so the `return`" LLVM,RISCV,3909,"The next statement of this code snippet is: return !DisableUsingConstantPoolForLargeInts;" LLVM,RISCV,3910,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be a comparison of the value returned by `getMinRVVVectorSizeInBits()` with the value of ``. The `getMinRVVVectorSizeInBits()` method is likely to return the minimum required vector size in bits for the current instruction set architecture (ISA). The `` value is likely to be a literal value that represents the minimum required vector size in bits for the instruction set architecture (ISA) being targeted by the code. Therefore, the next statement of" LLVM,RISCV,3911,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `Subtarget` class and the value of the `EnableSubRegLiveness` member variable. However, based on the name of the function and the fact that it is a `const` member function, it is likely that the next statement will be a return statement that returns the value of the `EnableSubRegLiveness` member variable." LLVM,RISCV,3912,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `if ( RVVVectorBitsMax < ( int ) ZvlLen ) report_fatal_error ( ) ;` This statement checks if the `RVVVectorBitsMax` variable is less than the `ZvlLen` variable, and if it is, it reports a fatal error with the specified string literals." LLVM,RISCV,3913,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be another `assert` statement, as the code is using the `assert` keyword to check for certain conditions. The first `assert` statement checks that `RVVVectorBitsMax` is within a certain range and is a power of 2. The second `assert` statement checks that `RVVVectorBitsMax` is greater than or equal to `RVVVectorBitsMin`, and the third `assert` statement checks that `RVVVectorBitsMax` is less than or equal to `RVVVectorB" LLVM,RISCV,3914,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `unsigned Max = RVVVectorBitsMax;`" LLVM,RISCV,3915,"The next statement of this code snippet is: return getMaxLMULForFixedLengthVectorsImpl(); The `getMaxLMULForFixedLengthVectors()` method is a member function of the `Subtarget` class, and it is declared as a `const` method, which means that it does not modify the object it is called on. The method is also marked with the `assert` keyword, which means that it is a runtime check that is performed when the method is called. The `assert` keyword is used to ensure that the method is only called when the `Subtarget` object has" LLVM,RISCV,3916,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `hasStdExtV ( ) && ;` This statement is an assertion that checks if the `hasStdExtV` function returns a truthy value and if the string literal `` is not empty. If either of these conditions is not met, the assertion will fail and an error will be thrown." LLVM,RISCV,3917,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `ParseSubtargetFeatures(CPUName, FS);`" LLVM,RISCV,3918,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be the initialization of the `InstrInfo` member variable, which is an instance of the `InstrInfo` class. The `InstrInfo` class is responsible for providing information about the instructions that can be generated by the target machine. The initialization of the `InstrInfo` member variable is likely to involve creating an instance of the `InstrInfo` class and passing it the necessary information, such as the target triple, CPU, and feature string, to initialize it properly. Here is an example of what the initialization of the `Instr" LLVM,RISCV,3919,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be the initialization of the `InstrInfo` member variable, which is an instance of the `InstrInfo` class. The `InstrInfo` class is responsible for providing information about the instructions that can be generated by the target machine. The initialization of the `InstrInfo` member variable is likely to involve creating an instance of the `InstrInfo` class and passing it the necessary information, such as the target triple, CPU, and feature string, to initialize it properly. Here is an example of what the initialization of the `Instr" LLVM,RISCV,3920,"The next statement in this code snippet is: `ParseSubtargetFeatures(CPUName, FS);` This statement calls the `ParseSubtargetFeatures` function with the `CPUName` and `FS` arguments. The `ParseSubtargetFeatures` function is not defined in the code snippet provided, so it is not possible to determine what it does. However, based on the name of the function, it is likely that it parses the subtarget features for the specified CPU and feature string." LLVM,RISCV,3921,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `ParseSubtargetFeatures(CPUName, FS);`" LLVM,RISCV,3922,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `CallLoweringInfo`, `Legalizer`, and `RegisterBankInfo` classes. However, based on the names of the classes and the methods being called, it appears that the code is setting up some kind of information or configuration for a call lowering or legalization process. Here are a few possibilities for what the next statement could be: 1. The code could be creating a new instance of a class that is used to represent the lowered or legalized form of" LLVM,RISCV,3923,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be the initialization of the `InstrInfo` member variable, which is likely to be a class that provides information about the instruction set architecture (ISA) of the target machine. The `InstrInfo` class is likely to be a subclass of the `GenSubtargetInfo` class, which is a base class for subtarget information. The `InstrInfo` class is likely to provide information about the instruction set architecture of the target machine, such as the instruction set, the register set, and the memory model. It may also provide methods for generating code" LLVM,RISCV,3924,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be the initialization of the `InstrInfo` member variable, which is likely to be a class that provides information about the instruction set architecture (ISA) of the target machine. The `InstrInfo` class is likely to be a subclass of the `GenSubtargetInfo` class, which is a base class for subtarget information. The `InstrInfo` class is likely to provide information about the instruction set architecture of the target machine, such as the instruction set, the register set, and the memory model. It may also provide methods for generating code" LLVM,RISCV,3925,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `ParseSubtargetFeatures(CPUName, FS);` This line calls the `ParseSubtargetFeatures` function with the `CPUName` and `FS` arguments. The `ParseSubtargetFeatures` function is not defined in the code snippet provided, so it is not possible to determine what it does or what its return value is. However, based on the name of the function, it is likely that it parses the subtarget features of the CPU specified by `CPUName` and stores the results in the `FS" LLVM,RISCV,3926,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `unsigned ELEN = hasVInstructionsI64() ? : ;` This line assigns the value of `ELEN` based on the result of the `hasVInstructionsI64()` function. If the function returns `true`, `ELEN` is assigned the value of ``. Otherwise, `ELEN` is assigned the value of ``." LLVM,RISCV,3927,"Based on the code snippet you provided, it appears to be a part of a larger function that is related to the RISC-V instruction set architecture (ISA). The function is named `getMaxELENForFixedLengthVectors` and it appears to be a member function of a class called `Subtarget`. The function is checking whether the `Subtarget` has vector instructions (`hasVInstructions`) and whether the `RVVVectorELENMax` is a valid value. If the `Subtarget` has vector instructions and `RVVVectorELENMax`" LLVM,RISCV,3928,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the implementation of the `HasC910` method and the state of the object. However, based on the code snippet provided, it is likely that the next statement will be a return statement that returns the value of the `HasC910` method." LLVM,RISCV,3929,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the program depends on the specific implementation of the `hasC910` function. However, based on the name of the function and the fact that it is a member function of a class, it is likely that the function checks whether the object has a certain property or value associated with it. Without more information about the specific implementation of the `hasC910` function, it is not possible to provide a more detailed prediction of the next statement." LLVM,RISCV,3930,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be the initialization of the `InstrInfo` member variable, which is an instance of the `RISCVInstrInfo` class. The `initializeSubtargetDependencies` function is called to initialize the `InstrInfo` object, passing in the `CPU` and `FS` parameters as arguments. The `InstrInfo` object is then used to initialize the `TLInfo` and `TSInfo` member variables, which are instances of the `RISCVTargetLowering` and `RISCVTargetInfo` classes, respectively. Finally," LLVM,RISCV,3931,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be the initialization of the `InstrInfo` member variable, which is an instance of the `RISCVInstrInfo` class. The `initializeSubtargetDependencies` function is called to initialize the `InstrInfo` object, passing in the `CPU` and `FS` parameters as arguments. The `InstrInfo` object is then used to initialize the `TLInfo` and `TSInfo` member variables, which are instances of the `RISCVTargetLowering` and `RISCVTargetInfo` classes, respectively. Finally," LLVM,RISCV,3932,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the program depends on various factors such as the input data, the specific implementation of the `hasStdExtZvqmac` function, and the overall structure of the program. However, based on the name of the function `hasStdExtZvqmac`, it is likely that the function checks whether a certain extension is present in a file or a data structure. The function may return a boolean value indicating whether the extension is present or not. Therefore, the next statement of this code" LLVM,RISCV,3933,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `CallLoweringInfo`, `Legalizer`, and `RegisterBankInfo` classes. However, based on the names of the classes and the methods being called, it appears that the code is setting up some kind of information or configuration for a call lowering and register bank. Here are a few possible next statements that could be executed: 1. `CallLoweringInfo::setTargetLowering(new CallLowering(*getTargetLower" LLVM,RISCV,3934,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the code depends on the specific inputs and environment in which it is executed. However, based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the `EnableCheriRVCInstrs` function is being called and its return value is being used as the return value of the outer function. Therefore, the next statement of this code snippet would likely be the return statement of the outer function, which would return the value returned by the `EnableCheriRVCInstrs` function." LLVM,RISCV,3935,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the implementation of the `enableCheriRVCInstrs` method and the state of the object that it is called on. However, based on the name of the method and the fact that it is a `const` method, it is likely that it will return a boolean value indicating whether the Cheri RVC instructions are enabled or not." LLVM,RISCV,3936,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `IsCapMode` function and the input parameters passed to it. However, based on the name of the function and the return type, it is likely that the `IsCapMode` function returns a boolean value indicating whether the current mode is capitalization mode. Therefore, the next statement of this code snippet is likely to be a conditional statement that checks the return value of `IsCapMode` and performs some action based on the result." LLVM,RISCV,3937,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the `isCapMode` function depends on the implementation of the `CapMode` class and the specific instance of the class that is being used. However, based on the name of the function and the fact that it is a member function of the `CapMode` class, it is likely that the function returns a boolean value indicating whether the current mode of the `CapMode` instance is in capitalization mode. Therefore, the next statement of this code snippet could be any statement that uses the return" LLVM,RISCV,3938,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `CallLoweringInfo`, `Legalizer`, and `RegisterBankInfo` classes. However, based on the names of the classes and the methods being called, it appears that the code is setting up some kind of information or configuration for a call lowering and register bank. Here are a few possible next statements that could be executed: 1. `CallLoweringInfo::setTargetLowering(new CallLowering(*getTargetLower" LLVM,RISCV,3939,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be: `InstSelector->selectInstructions();` This is because the previous line of code, `InstSelector.reset(createInstructionSelector(...));`, creates a new `InstructionSelector` object and sets it as the current selector for the `InstSelector` object. The `selectInstructions()` method is then called on the `InstructionSelector` object to select the instructions for the current instruction selector." LLVM,RISCV,3940,"The next statement of this code snippet is: return is64Bit() ? ""64-bit"" : ""32-bit"";" LLVM,RISCV,3941,"The next statement of this code snippet is: return is64Bit() ? ""64-bit"" : ""32-bit"";" LLVM,RISCV,3942,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `ParseSubtargetFeatures(CPUName, TuneCPUName, FS);`" LLVM,RISCV,3943,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be the initialization of the `InstrInfo` field of the `Subtarget` class, which is a member of the `GenSubtargetInfo` class. The `InstrInfo` field is initialized by calling the `initializeSubtargetDependencies` function, which takes the CPU and FS strings as arguments. The `initializeSubtargetDependencies` function is likely to initialize the `InstrInfo` field by creating a new instance of the `InstrInfo` class and passing it the CPU and FS strings as arguments. The `InstrInfo" LLVM,RISCV,3944,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be the initialization of the `InstrInfo` field of the `Subtarget` class, which is a member of the `GenSubtargetInfo` class. The `InstrInfo` field is initialized by calling the `initializeSubtargetDependencies` function, which takes the CPU and FS strings as arguments. The `initializeSubtargetDependencies` function is likely to initialize the `InstrInfo` field by creating a new instance of the `InstrInfo` class and passing it the CPU and FS strings as arguments. The `InstrInfo" LLVM,RISCV,3945,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be the initialization of the `InstrInfo` object, which is a member of the `Subtarget` class. The `InstrInfo` object is initialized with a reference to the `Subtarget` object itself, which is passed as an argument to the constructor. Here's the predicted next statement: ``` InstrInfo( *this ); ``` This statement initializes the `InstrInfo` object with the `Subtarget` object as its parent, which allows the `InstrInfo` object to access the `Subtarget` object" LLVM,RISCV,3946,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be the initialization of the `InstrInfo` object, which is a member of the `Subtarget` class. The `InstrInfo` object is initialized with a reference to the `Subtarget` object itself, which is passed as an argument to the constructor. Here's the predicted next statement: ``` InstrInfo( *this ); ``` This statement initializes the `InstrInfo` object with the `Subtarget` object as its parent, which allows the `InstrInfo` object to access the `Subtarget` object" LLVM,RISCV,3947,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `assert(hasVInstructions() && );` This statement is an assertion that checks if the `hasVInstructions()` function returns `true` and if the string literal `` is not empty. If either of these conditions is not met, the assertion will fail and an error message will be displayed." LLVM,RISCV,3948,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return PowerOf2Floor(std::max(std::min(RVVVectorELENMax, ), ));` This statement is a return statement that returns the result of the `PowerOf2Floor` function, which is called with two arguments: the maximum value of `RVVVectorELENMax` and a numerical literal. The `PowerOf2Floor` function is defined in the `std` namespace and is used to calculate the" LLVM,RISCV,3949,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be a function call or a method call that uses the values of `RVVVectorBitsMax`, `RVVVectorBitsMin`, and other variables as arguments. The first `assert` statement checks that `RVVVectorBitsMax` is a valid value, which is a power of 2 and within a certain range. The second `assert` statement checks that `RVVVectorBitsMax` is greater than or equal to `RVVVectorBitsMin`, which is another variable that is likely to be defined in" LLVM,RISCV,3950,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be another `assert` statement, as the code is using the `assert` keyword to check for certain conditions. The first `assert` statement checks whether the `hasVInstructions` function returns `true` and whether the string literal `` is not empty. The second `assert` statement checks whether the `RVVVectorBitsMin` variable is equal to `` or whether it is greater than or equal to `` and less than or equal to `` and" LLVM,RISCV,3951,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be a declaration of a variable `Min` with the value of `RVVVectorBitsMin`. The `assert` statement is used to check that the value of `RVVVectorBitsMax` is greater than or equal to `RVVVectorBitsMin`, or that `RVVVectorBitsMax` is equal to a specific value (represented by ``). The `assert` statement also checks that the value of `RVVVectorBitsMax` is less than or equal to a specific value" LLVM,RISCV,3952,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the context in which the code is being executed and the values of the variables involved. However, based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the function `HasStdExtP` is being called and its return value is being returned from the function." LLVM,RISCV,3953,"It's not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `Zvl65536b` function. However, based on the name of the function, it is likely that it is a function that returns a 65536-bit value. Without more information about the specific implementation of the `Zvl65536b` function, it is not possible to provide a more specific prediction of the next statement." LLVM,RISCV,3954,"The next statement of this code snippet is: return HasStdExtV || HasStdExtZve32x;" LLVM,RISCV,3955,"The next statement after `return HasStdExtV || HasStdExtZve32x` is likely to be the end of the function, as there are no more statements after this line. Therefore, the next statement would be the end of the function, which is typically indicated by a closing curly brace `}`." LLVM,RISCV,3956,"The next statement of this code snippet is: return HasStdExtV || (HasStdExtZve32f && HasStdExtF);" LLVM,RISCV,3957,"The next statement of this code snippet is: return HasStdExtV || (HasStdExtZve32f && HasStdExtF);" LLVM,RISCV,3958,"The next statement after the code snippet you provided is: return HasStdExtV || ( HasStdExtZve64d && HasStdExtD ) ; This statement is a boolean expression that returns true if either of the following conditions is true: * HasStdExtV is true * HasStdExtZve64d is true and HasStdExtD is true In other words, this statement returns true if the CPU has the V extension or if it has the Zve64d and D extensions." LLVM,RISCV,3959,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `hasVInstructionsF64` function. However, based on the name of the function, it is likely that it checks whether the current instruction set architecture (ISA) supports the V instructions for 64-bit floating-point numbers. If the current ISA does not support these instructions, the function may return `false`." LLVM,RISCV,3960,"The next statement of this code snippet is: return HasStdExtV || HasStdExtZve64x;" LLVM,RISCV,3961,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the function is dependent on the specific implementation of the `hasVInstructionsI64` function. However, based on the name of the function, it is likely that it returns a boolean value indicating whether the current instruction is a `VInstruction` with a 64-bit operand." LLVM,RISCV,3962,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the function is dependent on the specific implementation of the `hasNonStdExtPulp` function. However, based on the name of the function, it is likely that the next statement will check if the current object has a non-standard extension pulp. Here are some possible next statements: 1. `return hasNonStdExtPulp(this);` 2. `return this->hasNonStdExtPulp();` 3. `return this->hasNonStdExtP" LLVM,RISCV,3963,The next statement after `return HasExtXCoreV` would be the end of the function. LLVM,RISCV,3964,"The next statement of this code snippet is: return HasExtXCoreVMac;" LLVM,RISCV,3965,"The next statement of this code snippet is: return HasExtXCoreVMem;" LLVM,RISCV,3966,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the implementation of the `HasStdExtV` function and the context in which the function is called. However, based on the name of the function and the return type, it is likely that the function checks for the presence of the V instructions in the current CPU. Therefore, the next statement of this code snippet could be any statement that is executed after the `HasStdExtV` function is called, such as: * A conditional statement that checks the return value of `HasStd" LLVM,RISCV,3967,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the implementation of the `HasStdExtV` function and the context in which the function is called. However, based on the name of the function and the return type, it is likely that the function checks for the presence of the V instructions in the current CPU. Therefore, the next statement of this code snippet could be any statement that is executed after the `HasStdExtV` function is called, such as: * A conditional statement that checks the return value of `HasStd" LLVM,RISCV,3968,"The next statement of this code snippet is: return HasStdExtV && hasStdExtZfh ( ) ;" LLVM,RISCV,3969,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the program depends on the specific input and the implementation of the `hasVInstructionsF32` function. However, based on the name of the function, it is likely that it checks whether the current instruction is a vector instruction that operates on 32-bit floating-point values. If this is the case, the next statement of the code snippet is likely to be a check for the specific vector instruction that is being searched for." LLVM,RISCV,3970,"The next statement of this code snippet is: return HasStdExtV && hasStdExtD();" LLVM,RISCV,3971,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `hasVInstructionsF64` function. However, based on the name of the function, it is likely that it checks whether the current instruction set architecture (ISA) supports the V instructions for 64-bit floating-point numbers. If the current ISA does not support these instructions, the function may return `false`." LLVM,RISCV,3972,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the context in which the code is being executed and the values of the variables involved. However, based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the function is returning a boolean value indicating whether the standard extension vector (StdExtV) is present or not." LLVM,RISCV,3973,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the function is dependent on the specific implementation of the `hasVInstructionsI64` function. However, based on the name of the function, it is likely that it returns a boolean value indicating whether the current instruction is a `VInstruction` with a 64-bit operand." LLVM,RISCV,3974,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the implementation of the `RegisterBankInfo` class and the `reset` method. However, based on the code snippet provided, it is likely that the next statement will be a call to the `reset` method of the `RegisterBankInfo` class, passing in the `RBI` object as an argument. Here is a possible next statement: ``` RegBankInfo.reset(RBI); ``` This statement will reset the `RegisterBankInfo` object to the state" LLVM,RISCV,3975,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be an assertion or a check for a certain condition. The code is checking the value of `RVVVectorBitsMax` and making sure it is a power of 2 and greater than or equal to `NUM_LIT`. It is also checking that `RVVVectorBitsMax` is greater than or equal to `RVVVectorBitsMin` and that `STR_LIT` is less than or equal to `STR_LIT`. Without knowing the specific values of the variables and literals, it is difficult to" LLVM,RISCV,3976,"The next statement after the `if` block in the code snippet is: `Min = std::min(RVVVectorBitsMin, RVVVectorBitsMax);` This statement assigns the minimum of `RVVVectorBitsMin` and `RVVVectorBitsMax` to the variable `Min`." LLVM,RISCV,3977,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be the initialization of the `InstrInfo` member variable, which is an instance of the `InstrInfo` class. The `InstrInfo` class is responsible for providing information about the instruction set architecture (ISA) of the target machine, and is used by the `GenSubtargetInfo` class to generate the subtarget information. Therefore, the next statement of this code snippet is likely to be the initialization of the `InstrInfo` member variable, which is an instance of the `InstrInfo` class. The `InstrInfo" LLVM,RISCV,3978,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be the initialization of the `InstrInfo` member variable, which is an instance of the `InstrInfo` class. The `InstrInfo` class is responsible for providing information about the instruction set architecture (ISA) of the target machine, and is used by the `GenSubtargetInfo` class to generate the subtarget information. Therefore, the next statement of this code snippet is likely to be the initialization of the `InstrInfo` member variable, which is an instance of the `InstrInfo` class. The `InstrInfo" LLVM,RISCV,3979,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `Subtarget` class and the `anchor` method. However, based on the name of the method and the fact that it is declared as a member of the `Subtarget` class, it is likely that the next statement will be a call to a method that is specific to the `Subtarget` class." LLVM,RISCV,3980,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `Subtarget` class and the `anchor` method. However, based on the name of the method and the fact that it is declared as a member of the `Subtarget` class, it is likely that the next statement will be a call to a method that is specific to the `Subtarget` class." LLVM,RISCV,3981,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `CallLowering` class and the `getCallLowering` method. However, based on the name of the method and the fact that it is declared as `const`, it is likely that the method returns a reference to a `CallLowering` object that is associated with the `Subtarget` object." LLVM,RISCV,3982,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the implementation of the `InstSelector` class and the specific instance of the class that is being used. However, based on the name of the method (`get()`) and the fact that it is being called on an instance of the `InstSelector` class, it is likely that the next statement will be a call to a method that retrieves an instance of a class that is selected by the `InstSelector`. Without more information about the specific implementation of the `InstSelector` class and the context" LLVM,RISCV,3983,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the implementation of the `Legalizer` class and the specific inputs and state of the program. However, based on the syntax and the fact that the `get()` method is being called on an instance of the `Legalizer` class, it is likely that the next statement will be a call to a method or function that takes the result of the `get()` method as an argument. Without more information about the specific implementation of the `Legalizer` class and the surrounding code, it" LLVM,RISCV,3984,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be a return statement, as the function `getMaxELENForFixedLengthVectors()` is expected to return a value. Based on the code snippet, it appears that the function is checking whether the subtarget has the standard extension `V` and whether the maximum vector length is a power of 2. If these conditions are met, the function returns the maximum vector length. Therefore, the next statement of this code snippet is likely to be a return statement that returns the maximum vector length, such as: ``` return RVV" LLVM,RISCV,3985,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return PowerOf2Floor(std::max(std::min(RVVVectorELENMax, ), ));` This statement is a function call to `PowerOf2Floor`, which takes two arguments: * `std::max(std::min(RVVVectorELENMax, ), )`: This is a call to the `std::max`" LLVM,RISCV,3986,"The next statement of this code snippet is: return hasStdExtV ( ) ? MaxInterleaveFactor : ; This statement is a ternary operator, which is a shorthand for an if-else statement. The condition is ""hasStdExtV ( )"", which checks if the standard extension is supported. If the condition is true, the first expression ""MaxInterleaveFactor"" is evaluated and returned. If the condition is false, the second expression """" is evaluated and returned." LLVM,RISCV,3987,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `hasStdExtV ( ) && ;` This statement is an assertion that checks if the `hasStdExtV` function returns a truthy value and if the string literal `` is not empty. If either of these conditions is not met, the assertion will fail and an error will be thrown." LLVM,RISCV,3988,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `unsigned Max = std::max(RVVVectorBitsMin, RVVVectorBitsMax);` This statement calculates the maximum value of `RVVVectorBitsMin` and `RVVVectorBitsMax` and assigns it to the variable `Max`." LLVM,RISCV,3989,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `unsigned Min = RVVVectorBitsMin;` This line declares a variable `Min` and initializes it with the value of `RVVVectorBitsMin`." LLVM,RISCV,3990,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `HasStdExtZvamo` function and the input parameters passed to it. However, based on the name of the function and the return type, it is likely that the function is checking whether the standard extension `Zvamo` is available on the current platform. If the function returns `true`, it means that the extension is available and can be used. If the function returns `false`, it means that the extension is not available and cannot be used." LLVM,RISCV,3991,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the code depends on the specific implementation of the `hasStdExtZvlsseg` method and the state of the object on which it is called. However, based on the name of the method and the fact that it is a member function of a class, it is likely that the method is used to check if the object has a standard extension for the Zvlsseg format. If the object does not have this extension, the method may return `false`. Without more information about the specific" LLVM,RISCV,3992,"The next statement in the code snippet is: `ParseSubtargetFeatures ( CPU , TuneCPU , FS ) ;` This statement is part of the `if ( Is64Bit )` block, which means that it will only be executed if the `Is64Bit` variable is true. The `ParseSubtargetFeatures` function is called with the `CPU`, `TuneCPU`, and `FS` arguments, which are all strings. The function is used to parse the subtarget features for the CPU and TuneCPU." LLVM,RISCV,3993,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific values of the variables and the behavior of the `report_fatal_error` function. However, based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the next statement will be: `TuneCPU = CPU;` This is because the `if` statement that precedes it checks whether the `TuneCPU` variable is empty, and if it is, it assigns the value of the `CPU` variable to `TuneCPU`." LLVM,RISCV,3994,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be: `InstSelector->selectInstructions();` This is because the previous line of code, `InstSelector.reset(createInstructionSelector(...));`, creates a new `InstructionSelector` object and sets it as the current selector for the `InstSelector` object. The `selectInstructions()` method is then called on the `InstructionSelector` object to select the instructions for the current instruction selector." LLVM,RISCV,3995,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `RegisterTarget` class and the `getThe32Target` function. However, based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the next statement will be a call to the `RegisterTarget` constructor, which will create a new instance of the `RegisterTarget` class with the specified parameters. The `RegisterTarget` constructor takes three parameters: a pointer to an `ISA_LIT` object, a string literal, and another string literal." LLVM,RISCV,3996,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `Target` class and the `getThe32Target` function. However, based on the syntax and the name of the function, it is likely that the next statement will return a reference to an object of type `Target` that is associated with the ISA_LIT32 instruction set architecture." LLVM,RISCV,3997,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the program depends on the specific values of the variables and the implementation of the `Target` class. However, based on the syntax and the fact that the `The` variable is declared as a `Target`, it is likely that the next statement will be an assignment or a method call on the `The` variable." LLVM,RISCV,3998,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `Target` class and the `getThe64Target` function. However, based on the syntax and the name of the function, it is likely that the next statement will return a reference to an instance of the `Target` class that is specific to the ISA_LIT64 architecture." LLVM,RISCV,3999,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `RegisterTarget` class and the `getThe32Target` function. However, based on the syntax and the names of the functions and variables, it appears that the next statement will be a call to the `RegisterTarget` constructor, which will create a new instance of the `Triple` class with the specified parameters. The `RegisterTarget` constructor takes four parameters: the first is a reference to an `ISA_LIT` object," LLVM,RISCV,4000,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the program depends on the specific values of the variables and the implementation of the `Target` class. However, based on the syntax and the fact that the `The` variable is declared as a `Target`, it is likely that the next statement will be an assignment or a method call on the `The` variable." LLVM,RISCV,4001,"The next statement of this code snippet is: return The32Target;" LLVM,RISCV,4002,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet without knowing the context and the purpose of the code. However, based on the syntax and the naming conventions used in the code, it appears to be a declaration of a static variable called `The64Target` of type `Target`. The `Target` type is likely a class or a struct that represents a target platform or architecture, and the `64` part of the variable name suggests that it is related to the x86-64 instruction set architecture. Without more" LLVM,RISCV,4003,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `RegisterTarget` class and the `getThe64Target` function. However, based on the information provided, it is likely that the next statement will be a call to the `RegisterTarget` constructor, passing in the `Triple` object, the `ISA_LIT` string, and two additional `STR_LIT` strings. Here is an example of what the next statement might look like: ``` RegisterTargetTargetInfo ( ) { RegisterTarget < Triple :: riscv32 > X ( getThe32Target ( ) , , , ) ; This statement is a function declaration, specifically a function named `LLVMInitializeTargetInfo` that takes no arguments and has external linkage" LLVM,RISCV,4005,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be a call to the `LLVMInitializeTarget` function, which is a function that initializes the target information for the specified instruction set architecture (ISA). The `LLVMInitializeTargetInfo` function is a part of the LLVM library and is used to initialize the target information for the specified ISA. Here is an example of how the `LLVMInitializeTargetInfo` function might be called: ``` LLVMInitialize<" LLVM,RISCV,4006,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `Ret += ;` This statement is adding the string literal `` to the `Ret` string." LLVM,RISCV,4007,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `PassConfig` class and the `ISA_LIT` interface. However, based on the syntax and the fact that the `PassConfig` class is being instantiated with `this` and `PM` as arguments, it is likely that the next statement will be a call to a method or property of the `PassConfig` object that was just created." LLVM,RISCV,4008,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet without knowing the context and the purpose of the code. However, based on the syntax and the function name `getTM`, it appears that the code is trying to retrieve a target machine object of type `ISA_LIT` from a database or a configuration file. Without more information, it is not possible to determine the exact behavior of the code or the next statement that will be executed." LLVM,RISCV,4009,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be: `RegisterTargetMachineTargetMachine> C(TheTarget);` This statement is similar to the previous two statements, but it registers a target machine for the `ISA_LIT` target, rather than the `ISA_LIT` and `ISA_LIT` targets." LLVM,RISCV,4010,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be the initialization of the base class `TargetMachine` with the given arguments. The code snippet is defining a constructor for the `ISA_LIT` class, which is a subclass of `TargetMachine`. The constructor is initializing the base class `TargetMachine` with the given arguments, which are: * `T`: a reference to a `Target` object * `TT`: a reference to a `Triple` object * `CPU`: a reference to a `StringRef` object * `FS`: a reference to a" LLVM,RISCV,4011,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be the initialization of the base class `TargetMachine` with the given arguments. The code snippet is defining a constructor for the `ISA_LIT` class, which is a subclass of `TargetMachine`. The constructor is initializing the base class `TargetMachine` with the given arguments, which are: * `T`: a reference to a `Target` object * `TT`: a reference to a `Triple` object * `CPU`: a reference to a `StringRef` object * `FS`: a reference to a" LLVM,RISCV,4012,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `PassConfig` class and the `TargetPassConfig` class. However, based on the code snippet provided, it is likely that the next statement will be a call to the `TargetPassConfig` constructor, which initializes the `TargetPassConfig` object with the provided `TargetMachine` and `PassManagerBase` objects. Here is an example of what the next statement might look like: ``` TargetPassConfig(TM, PM); ``` This statement would initialize the" LLVM,RISCV,4013,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `PassConfig` class and the `TargetPassConfig` class. However, based on the code snippet provided, it is likely that the next statement will be a call to the `TargetPassConfig` constructor, which initializes the `TargetPassConfig` object with the provided `TargetMachine` and `PassManagerBase` objects. Here is an example of what the next statement might look like: ``` TargetPassConfig(TM, PM); ``` This statement would initialize the" LLVM,RISCV,4014,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be the initialization of the `TLOF` member variable, which is a unique pointer to a `TargetObjectFile` object. The `make_unique` function is used to create the `TargetObjectFile` object, and the resulting pointer is stored in the `TLOF` variable. Here is the predicted next statement: `TLOF = make_unique();`" LLVM,RISCV,4015,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `TLOF` class and the context in which this code is being executed. However, based on the syntax and the fact that the `get()` method is being called on an instance of the `TLOF` class, it is likely that the next statement will be a call to the `get()` method of the `TLOF` class, which will return a value of some kind." LLVM,RISCV,4016,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return new yaml::MachineFunctionInfo(*MFI);` This statement creates a new instance of the `yaml::MachineFunctionInfo` class, passing in the `MFI` object as an argument. The `*` operator is used to dereference the `MFI` pointer, so that the `yaml::MachineFunctionInfo` constructor can access the data stored in the `MFI` object." LLVM,RISCV,4017,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet without knowing the context and the definition of the `MF` object and the `getInfo` method. However, based on the syntax and the use of the `auto` keyword, it appears that the code is using C++ and is attempting to retrieve a pointer to a `MachineFunctionInfo` object from the `MF` object. Without more information, it is not possible to determine the exact type of the `MFI` variable or the next statement of the code." LLVM,RISCV,4018,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return TargetTransformInfo TargetMachine::getTargetTransformInfo(F);` This statement returns the `TargetTransformInfo` object for the specified function `F`. The `getTargetTransformInfo` method is called on the `TargetMachine` object, which is a subclass of `TargetTransformInfo`. The `ISA_LIT` template parameter is used to specify the instruction set architecture (ISA) for which the target transform info is being requested." LLVM,RISCV,4019,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be: `return getTargetTriple().isArch64Bit();` This statement is a method call that returns a boolean value indicating whether the target triple is a 64-bit architecture. The method `isArch64Bit()` is called on the result of `getTargetTriple()`, which is a string representing the target triple. The return value of this method is then returned by the `IsRV64()` method." LLVM,RISCV,4020,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `PFS` class and the `MachineFunctionInfo` class. However, based on the syntax and the context of the code, it is likely that the next statement will be a call to a method or function that initializes the base YAML fields of the `MachineFunctionInfo` object. Here is a possible next statement: ``` PFS.MF.getInfoMachineFunctionInfo>(YamlMFI).initializeBaseYamlFields();" LLVM,RISCV,4021,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return ;` This is because the `if` statement checks if the current architecture is 64-bit, and if it is, the function returns the string literal ``. If the current architecture is not 64-bit, the `else` block is executed, which asserts that the current architecture is 32-bit and the string literal `` is true." LLVM,RISCV,4022,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `TT` class and the value of the `` constant. However, based on the syntax and the fact that the `isArch32Bit()` method is being called, it is likely that the next statement will be a conditional statement that checks the result of the `isArch32Bit()` method and performs some action based on the result." LLVM,RISCV,4023,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `TargetMachine` class and the `createPassConfig` method. However, based on the name of the method and the parameters it takes, it is likely that the next statement will be a call to the `createPassConfig` method of the `TargetMachine` class, passing in the `PassManagerBase` object `PM` as an argument. Here is an example of what the next statement might look like: ``` TargetPassConfig *config = TargetMachine::createPassConfig" LLVM,RISCV,4024,"The next statement after the given code snippet is: `return new TargetPassConfig( *this, PM );` This statement creates a new `TargetPassConfig` object and returns it to the caller. The `TargetPassConfig` constructor takes two arguments: a reference to the `TargetMachine` object (which is `*this` in this context) and a reference to the `PassManagerBase` object (which is `PM` in this context). The `TargetPassConfig` object is then returned to the caller, which is likely to be a `PassManager` object that is responsible for man" LLVM,RISCV,4025,"The next statement after the `if` statement would be the `return` statement inside the `if` block. So, the next statement would be: ``` return *CM; ```" LLVM,RISCV,4026,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific values of the variables and the logic of the program. However, based on the syntax and the fact that the `return` statement is inside an `if` block, it is likely that the next statement after this code snippet will be the statement that follows the `if` block. In other words, if the condition `CM` is true, the code will return the value of `*CM`, and if the condition is false, the code will continue executing the next statement after the `if` block" LLVM,RISCV,4027,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be the initialization of the `LLVMInitializeTarget` function, which is a function that initializes the target machine for the specified instruction set architecture (ISA). The function takes no arguments and returns no value. It is likely to be called by the LLVM initialization code to initialize the target machine for the specified ISA. The function body is not provided in the code snippet, so it is not possible to determine the exact behavior of the function. However, based on the name of the function and the fact that it" LLVM,RISCV,4028,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `LLVMTargetMachine::LLVMTargetMachine(T, computeDataLayout(TT), TT, CPU, FS, Options, getEffectiveRelocModel(TT, RM), getEffectiveCodeModel(CM), OL)`" LLVM,RISCV,4029,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be the initialization of the `TLOF` member variable, which is a unique pointer to an instance of the `ELFTargetObjectFile` class. The `make_unique` function is used to create a new instance of the `ELFTargetObjectFile` class and assign it to the `TLOF` member variable. Here is the next statement of the code snippet: ``` TLOF = make_unique(); ```" LLVM,RISCV,4030,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be the initialization of the `TLOF` member variable, which is a unique pointer to an instance of the `ELFTargetObjectFile` class. The `make_unique` function is used to create a new instance of the `ELFTargetObjectFile` class and assign it to the `TLOF` member variable. Here is the next statement of the code snippet: ``` TLOF = make_unique(); ```" LLVM,RISCV,4031,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the implementation of the `isArch64Bit` method and the value of the `TT` object. However, based on the code snippet, it appears that the `isArch64Bit` method is checking if the current architecture is 64-bit, and if it is, the method is returning a string literal. If the architecture is not 64-bit, the method is executing the code in the `else` block, which is not shown in the code snippet." LLVM,RISCV,4032,"The next statement of the code snippet is: return ; This is because the `computeDataLayout` function is checking if the `Triple` object `TT` is 64-bit architecture, and if it is, it returns the string literal """". If `TT` is not 64-bit, the function returns the result of the `else` block, which is not specified in the code snippet." LLVM,RISCV,4033,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `TLOF = make_unique();` This statement creates a new instance of the `TargetLoweringObjectFileELF` class and assigns it to the `TLOF` variable. The `make_unique` function is used to create a unique pointer to the new instance, which is then assigned to `TLOF`." LLVM,RISCV,4034,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `TLOF = make_unique();` This statement creates a new instance of the `TargetLoweringObjectFileELF` class and assigns it to the `TLOF` variable. The `make_unique` function is used to create a unique pointer to the new instance, which is then assigned to `TLOF`." LLVM,RISCV,4035,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return false;` This statement is executed after the `addPass` method is called with a new `InstructionSelect` object as an argument. The `addPass` method is a member function of the `PassConfig` class, and it adds a pass to the pass manager. In this case, a new `InstructionSelect` object is created and added to the pass manager. The `addGlobalInstructionSelect` method returns `false` to indicate that the pass was not added successfully. This is because the `addPass` method returns" LLVM,RISCV,4036,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the `addGlobalInstructionSelect` method is not specified. However, based on the name of the method and the fact that it is a member of the `PassConfig` class, it is likely that this method adds a global instruction selection to the pass configuration. Without more information about the specific implementation of the `PassConfig` class and the `addGlobalInstructionSelect` method, it is not possible to provide a more detailed prediction of the next statement." LLVM,RISCV,4037,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `TM -> getOptLevel ( ) != CodeGenOpt :: None` This is a comparison operation that checks if the optimization level of the current translation module is not equal to `CodeGenOpt :: None`. If the optimization level is not `None`, then the `if` statement will be executed." LLVM,RISCV,4038,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `addPass(createMergeBaseOffsetOptPass());` This statement adds a pass to the optimization pipeline, which is responsible for merging base offsets in the ISA. The pass is created using the `createMergeBaseOffsetOptPass()` function, which returns a new instance of the `MergeBaseOffsetOptPass` class. The `addPass()` function is then called with this new pass as an argument, which adds it to the optimization pipeline." LLVM,RISCV,4039,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be the initialization of the `LLVMInitializeTarget` function, which is a function that is defined in the LLVM library. This function is called to initialize the target machine for the specified ISA (Instruction Set Architecture), which is represented by the `ISA_LIT` template parameter. The function is defined as follows: ``` LLVM_EXTERNAL_VISIBILITY void LLVMInitializeTarget ( ) { RegisterTargetMachine < ; This statement is the return statement of the function, which returns the string literal ." LLVM,RISCV,4043,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return ;` This statement is reached if the condition `TT.isArch32Bit() && ` is true. The `return` statement will return the value of `` to the caller of the function." LLVM,RISCV,4044,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be the initialization of the `LLVMInitializeTarget` function, which is a function that initializes the target machine for the specified instruction set architecture (ISA). The function takes no arguments and returns no value. It is likely to be called by the LLVM initialization code to initialize the target machine for the specified ISA. The function body is not provided in the code snippet, so it is not possible to determine the exact behavior of the function. However, based on the name of the function and the fact that it" LLVM,RISCV,4045,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be the initialization of the `TLOF` field, which is a unique pointer to an instance of the `ELFTargetObjectFile` class. The `std::make_unique` function is used to create the unique pointer, and the `ELFTargetObjectFile` constructor is called with no arguments. Here is the predicted next statement: ``` TLOF = std::make_unique(); ```" LLVM,RISCV,4046,"The next statement in the code snippet is likely to be: `initializeCleanupVSETVLIPass ( * PR ) ;` This is because the previous statement in the code snippet is `initializeCleanupVSETVLIPass ( * PR ) ;`, and the next statement is likely to be the next initialization of a pass for the same ISA." LLVM,RISCV,4047,The next statement after `addPass ( new InstructionSelect ( getOptLevel ( ) ) ) ;` is `return false ;`. LLVM,RISCV,4048,"The next statement in the code snippet is: addPass(createGatherScatterLoweringPass());" LLVM,RISCV,4049,"The next statement of this code snippet is: return false;" LLVM,RISCV,4050,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the `addLegalizeMachineIR` function is not specified. However, based on the name of the function, it appears to be related to adding legalization of machine IR to the pass configuration. Therefore, the next statement of this code snippet could potentially be a call to another function that performs the actual legalization of machine IR, or it could be a statement that updates the pass configuration to indicate that the legalization of machine IR has been added. Without more information about the code and its intended behavior," LLVM,RISCV,4051,"The next statement after the code snippet you provided is: `return false;` This statement is the last statement in the `addLegalizeMachineIR` function, and it returns a `false` value to indicate that the function did not successfully add a pass to the pipeline." LLVM,RISCV,4052,"The next statement after the `if` block is the `addPass` function call. The `addPass` function takes a single argument, which is a pass object. In this case, the pass object is created using the `createSExtWRemovalPass` function. The `createSExtWRemovalPass` function creates a new pass object of type `ISA_LIT::SExtWRemovalPass`. This pass object is then passed to the `addPass` function, which adds it to the list" LLVM,RISCV,4053,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the `addPostRegAlloc` method is not specified. However, based on the name of the method and the fact that it is a member of the `PassConfig` class, it is likely that this method is used to add a post-registration allocation to the configuration of the pass. Without more information about the specific pass and the context in which this code is being used, it is not possible to provide a more detailed prediction of the next statement." LLVM,RISCV,4054,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `TM -> getOptLevel ( ) != CodeGenOpt :: None && EnableRedundantCopyElimination` This is a logical AND operation that checks if the optimization level is not set to ""None"" and if the redundant copy elimination optimization is enabled. If both conditions are true, the `addPass` method is called with a new instance of the `ISA_LITRedundantCopyEliminationPass` class." LLVM,RISCV,4055,"The next statement after the code snippet you provided is: `addPass ( createExpandAtomicPseudoPass ( ) ) ;` This statement creates a new pass using the `createExpandAtomicPseudoPass` function and adds it to the pass manager using the `addPass` function. The `ISA_LIT` parameter specifies the instruction set architecture (ISA) for the pass." LLVM,RISCV,4056,"The next statement after the code snippet you provided is: `addPass ( createExpandAtomicPseudoPass ( ) ) ;` This statement creates a new pass using the `createExpandAtomicPseudoPass` function and adds it to the pass manager using the `addPass` function. The `ISA_LIT` parameter specifies the instruction set architecture (ISA) for the pass." LLVM,RISCV,4057,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `addPass(createMergeBaseOffsetOptPass());`" LLVM,RISCV,4058,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `addPass(createMergeBaseOffsetOptPass());`" LLVM,RISCV,4059,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the code is incomplete and the function `addPreSched2` is not defined. However, based on the name of the function, it is likely that it is related to the pre-scheduling of instructions in the code. Without more context, it is difficult to provide a more specific prediction." LLVM,RISCV,4060,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the code is incomplete and the function `addPreSched2` is not defined. However, based on the name of the function, it is likely that it is related to the pre-scheduling of instructions in the code. Without more context, it is difficult to provide a more specific prediction." LLVM,RISCV,4061,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be: `return true;` This is because the `addRegBankSelect` function is expected to return a boolean value indicating whether the pass was successfully added to the configuration. The `addPass` function is called with a new instance of the `RegBankSelect` class, which is a pass that selects the appropriate register bank for the current instruction. If the pass is successfully added to the configuration, the function returns `true`, indicating that the pass was added successfully." LLVM,RISCV,4062,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the implementation of the `addPass` and `RegBankSelect` functions. However, based on the names of the functions, it is likely that the next statement will add a new pass to the current rendering pipeline, and the `RegBankSelect` function will be used to select a register bank for the new pass." LLVM,RISCV,4063,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return ;` The `computeDataLayout` function is checking if the architecture is 64-bit by calling the `isArch64Bit` method on the `Triple` object. If the architecture is 64-bit, the function returns a string literal. If the architecture is not 64-bit, the function asserts that it is 32-bit and returns another string literal." LLVM,RISCV,4064,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return ;` This statement is reached if the condition `TT.isArch32Bit() && ` is true. The `return` statement will return the value of `` to the caller of the function." LLVM,RISCV,4065,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be: `I = SubtargetMap[Key];` This is because the code is checking if the `I` variable is not null, and if it is null, it is assigning a new value to it. The `SubtargetMap` is a map of strings to `Subtarget` objects, and the `Key` variable is a concatenation of the `CPU`, `TuneCPU`, and `FS` strings. The `I` variable is likely to be a reference to a `Subtarget` object in the `Subtarget" LLVM,RISCV,4066,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `I = SubtargetMap[Key];` Explanation: The code snippet is defining a map called `SubtargetMap` that maps a string key to a value of type `auto&`. The key is constructed by concatenating three strings: `CPU`, `TuneCPU`, and `FS`. The value is initialized to `resetTargetOptions(F)` if the key is not already in the map. The code then checks if the key is already in the map by checking if the value is null. If the key" LLVM,RISCV,4067,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `TargetMachine` class and the values of the `SrcAS` and `DstAS` parameters. However, based on the name of the method and the parameters, it is likely that the next statement will check if the address space cast from `SrcAS` to `DstAS` is a no-op, meaning that it does not change the address space. Here is a possible next statement: ``` return SrcAS == DstAS; ```" LLVM,RISCV,4068,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `TargetMachine` class and the values of the `SrcAS` and `DstAS` parameters. However, based on the name of the method and the parameters, it is likely that the next statement will check if the address space cast from `SrcAS` to `DstAS` is a no-op, meaning that it does not change the address space. Here is a possible next statement: ``` return SrcAS == DstAS; ```" LLVM,RISCV,4069,"The next statement in this code snippet is likely to be the initialization of another pass, as the pattern of the previous statements suggests that each pass is being initialized in a similar manner. Therefore, the next statement is likely to be: initializePassName ( * PR ) ; where PassName is the name of the next pass to be initialized." LLVM,RISCV,4070,"The next statement after the code snippet you provided is: `addPass ( createMakeCompressibleOptPass ( ) ) ;` This statement creates a new pass using the `createMakeCompressibleOptPass ( )` function, and adds it to the pass manager using the `addPass` function." LLVM,RISCV,4071,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the `addPreEmitPass` method is not specified. However, based on the name of the method and the fact that it is a member of the `PassConfig` class, it is likely that this method is used to add a pre-emit pass to a pass configuration. A pre-emit pass is a pass that is executed before the emitter pass, which is responsible for generating the final output of the compiler. Pre-emit passes are typically used to perform tasks such as code optimization, dead code" LLVM,RISCV,4072,"The next statement after the `if` block is the `addPass` function call. The `addPass` function is called with the `createBarrierNoopPass` function as an argument. This function creates a new pass that does nothing, but it is used to insert a barrier in the optimization pipeline. Therefore, the next statement after the `if` block is the `addPass` function call, which adds the new pass to the optimization pipeline." LLVM,RISCV,4073,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `RegisterTargetMachine < TargetMachine > Y ( getThe64Target ( ) ) ;` This statement registers a target machine with the name ""Y"" and the ISA ""ISA_LIT"" (which is likely a placeholder for a specific instruction set architecture). The target machine is obtained by calling the `getThe64Target` function, which returns a pointer to a `TargetMachine` object. The `RegisterTargetMachine` function is" LLVM,RISCV,4074,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `TLOF = std::make_unique();` This statement creates a new instance of the `ISA_LIT::ELFTargetObjectFile` class and assigns it to the `TLOF` variable. The `std::make_unique` function is used to create a unique pointer to the new object, which is then assigned to `TLOF`." LLVM,RISCV,4075,"The next statement after the `if` block is the `addPass` function call. The `addPass` function takes a single argument, which is a pointer to a `Pass` object. In this case, the argument is a pointer to a `RemoveRedundancyVSETVLPass` object, which is created by the `create` function. Therefore, the next statement after the `if` block is: ``` addPass(createRemoveRedundancyVSETVLPass()); ```" LLVM,RISCV,4076,"The next statement after the `if` block is the `addPass` function call. The `addPass` function takes a single argument, which is a pointer to a `Pass` object. In this case, the argument is a pointer to a `RemoveRedundancyVSETVLPass` object, which is created by the `create` function. Therefore, the next statement after the `if` block is: ``` addPass(createRemoveRedundancyVSETVLPass()); ```" LLVM,RISCV,4077,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `I = SubtargetMap[Key];` Explanation: The code snippet is defining a variable `I` as a reference to the value in the `SubtargetMap` map that corresponds to the key `Key`. The `SubtargetMap` map is defined earlier in the code as a `std::map` that maps CPU and FS attributes to subtarget names. The `Key` variable is constructed by concatenating the `CPU` and `FS` strings. The `!" LLVM,RISCV,4078,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be the initialization of the `GlobalISel` pass, which is a pass that performs global instruction selection for the target machine. The `initializeGlobalISel` function is called with a pointer to the `PassRegistry` object, which is used to register the pass with the pass manager. Here is the predicted next statement: ``` initializeGlobalISel(PR); ```" LLVM,RISCV,4079,"The next statement after the given code snippet is likely to be: `TargetPassConfig::addIRPasses(createCheriBoundAllocasPass());` This is because the `addPass` function is called with the result of `createCheriBoundAllocasPass`, which is a `Pass` object, and the `TargetPassConfig::addIRPasses` function is called with the `Pass` object as an argument." LLVM,RISCV,4080,"The next statement after the given code snippet is likely to be: `TargetPassConfig::addIRPasses(createCheriBoundAllocasPass());` This is because the `addPass` function is called with the result of `createCheriBoundAllocasPass`, which is a `Pass` object, and the `TargetPassConfig::addIRPasses` function is called with the `Pass` object as an argument." LLVM,RISCV,4081,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `StringRef PurecapOptions = ;` This statement declares a variable `PurecapOptions` of type `StringRef` and initializes it with the value ``." LLVM,RISCV,4082,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return ( + CapTypes + IntegerTypes + + PurecapOptions).str();` This statement is the final statement of the `getCompilerRT` method, and it returns a string that represents the compiler runtime library name. The string is constructed by concatenating several other strings, including ``, `CapTypes`, `IntegerTypes`, ``, and `PurecapOptions`." LLVM,RISCV,4083,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `TargetMachine` class and the values of the `SrcAS` and `DstAS` parameters. However, based on the name of the method and the parameters, it is likely that the next statement will check if the address space cast from `SrcAS` to `DstAS` is a no-op, meaning that it does not change the address space. Here is a possible next statement: ``` return SrcAS == DstAS; ```" LLVM,RISCV,4084,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be the initialization of the `TLOF` member variable, which is a unique pointer to an instance of the `ELFTargetObjectFile` class. The `std::make_unique` function is used to create a unique pointer to a new instance of the `ELFTargetObjectFile` class, and the `TLOF` member variable is assigned the resulting pointer. Here is the predicted next statement: ``` TLOF = std::make_unique(); ```" LLVM,RISCV,4085,The next statement after the `if` statement is `resetTargetOptions(F)`. LLVM,RISCV,4086,"Based on the code snippet you provided, it appears that the next statement after the `initializeInsertVSETVLIPass` line would be: `initializeLowerVSETVLIPass ( * PR ) ;` This is because the `initializeInsertVSETVLIPass` line is calling the `initialize` function with the `ISA_LIT` template parameter, which is used to initialize the `InsertVSETVLIPass` class. The next line after this would likely be the initialization" LLVM,RISCV,4087,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be the initialization of the `AsmInfo` object, which is a member of the `TargetMachine` class. The `initAsmInfo` method is called in the constructor of the `TargetMachine` class to initialize the `AsmInfo` object. The `AsmInfo` object is used to store information about the assembly language, such as the instruction set architecture, the register set, and the memory model. It is used by the assembler to generate assembly code that can be executed by the target machine. Therefore, the next statement" LLVM,RISCV,4088,The next statement after the `if` block is the `addPass` function call with the `ExpandAtomicPseudoPass` argument. LLVM,RISCV,4089,"The next statement after the code snippet you provided is: `addPass ( createExpandPseudoPass ( ) ) ;` This statement creates a new pass using the `createExpandPseudoPass` function, and then adds it to the pass manager using the `addPass` function. The `createExpandPseudoPass` function creates a new pass that expands pseudo instructions in the input LLVM IR. The `addPass` function adds the new pass to the pass manager, which" LLVM,RISCV,4090,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return false;` Explanation: The `addPreISel` function is checking if the optimization level is not `CodeGenOpt::None`. If it is not, then the function returns `false`. If the optimization level is `CodeGenOpt::None`, then the function will continue to execute the next statement." LLVM,RISCV,4091,The next statement after the `if` block is the `addPass` function call. LLVM,RISCV,4092,"The next statement after the code snippet you provided is: `addPass ( createMergeBaseOffsetOptPass ( ) ) ;` This statement creates a new pass object using the `createMergeBaseOffsetOptPass` function, and then adds it to the pass manager using the `addPass` function. The `ISA_LIT` parameter specifies the instruction set architecture (ISA) for which the pass is being created." LLVM,RISCV,4093,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `addPass(createMergeBaseOffsetOptPass());` This statement adds a pass to the `PassConfig` object, which is an instance of the `ISA_LIT` class. The pass being added is an instance of the `MergeBaseOffsetOptPass` class, which is a subclass of the `ISA_LIT` class. The `create` method is used to create an instance of the `MergeBaseOffsetOptPass` class, and the resulting object is passed to the `" LLVM,RISCV,4094,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `TLOF = make_uniqueELFTargetObjectFile>();` This statement creates a new instance of the `ISA_LIT` class and assigns it to the `TLOF` variable. The `make_unique` function is used to create a unique pointer to the new instance, which is then assigned to `TLOF`. The `ISA_LIT` class is not defined in the code snippet you provided, so it is not possible to determine what the `ISA_LIT" LLVM,RISCV,4095,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `TLOF = make_uniqueELFTargetObjectFile>();` This statement creates a new instance of the `ISA_LIT` class and assigns it to the `TLOF` variable. The `make_unique` function is used to create a unique pointer to the new instance, which is then assigned to `TLOF`. The `ISA_LIT` class is not defined in the code snippet you provided, so it is not possible to determine what the `ISA_LIT" LLVM,RISCV,4096,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `I = SubtargetMap[Key];` Explanation: The code snippet is defining a variable `I` as a reference to the value in the `SubtargetMap` with key `Key`. The `SubtargetMap` is a map of strings to values, and the key `Key` is a concatenation of the strings `CPU` and `FS`. The `SubtargetMap` is being used to store information about the target architecture and ABI for a compiler. The code is checking if the value for the key `Key" LLVM,RISCV,4097,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `PassRegistry` class and the `getPassRegistry` function. However, based on the code provided, it is likely that the next statement will be a call to the `getPassRegistry` function, which will return a reference to the `PassRegistry` object. Here is an example of what the next statement might look like: ``` auto PR = PassRegistry::getPassRegistry(); ``` This statement will retrieve a reference to the `PassRegistry` object, which can" LLVM,RISCV,4098,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be a call to the `initializeGlobalISel` function, which initializes the global instruction selector for the specified target machine. The function takes a pointer to a `PassRegistry` object as an argument, which is obtained by calling the `getPassRegistry` function. Here is the predicted next statement: ``` initializeGlobalISel(PR); ```" LLVM,RISCV,4099,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `addPass(createPulpHWLoopsPass());` This statement is adding a pass to the optimization pipeline, specifically the `ISA_LIT` pass, which is responsible for generating code for the Pulp hardware loops. The `createPulpHWLoopsPass()` function is called to create an instance of the `PulpHWLoopsPass` class, which is then passed to the `addPass()` function to add it to the optimization pipeline." LLVM,RISCV,4100,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be the initialization of the `LLVMInitializeTarget` function, which is a function that is defined in the LLVM library. This function is used to initialize the target machine for the specified instruction set architecture (ISA). The function takes no arguments and returns no value. It is called by the `LLVMInitialize` function, which is responsible for initializing the LLVM system. The function body of `LLVMInitializeTarget` is not shown in the code snippet," LLVM,RISCV,4101,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `TargetPassConfig::addISelPrepare();`." LLVM,RISCV,4102,"The next statement in the code snippet is: addPass(createPromoteMemoryToRegisterPass());" LLVM,RISCV,4103,"The next statement after the given code snippet is: `TargetPassConfig :: addPass ( createOptimizeVSETVLUsesPass ( ) ) ;` This statement adds a pass to the target pass configuration, which is used to optimize the use of VSETVL instructions in the generated code. The pass is created using the `createOptimizeVSETVLUsesPass` function, which returns a pass that performs the optimization. The pass is then added to the target pass configuration using the `addPass`" LLVM,RISCV,4104,"The next statement after `return * RM;` would be `return Reloc::Static;`. The `return` statement is used to return a value from a function. In this case, the function is returning the value of `Reloc::Static` if `RM` does not have a value, and the value of `*RM` otherwise. The `! RM . hasValue ( )` check is used to determine if `RM` has a value. If it does not have a value, the function returns `Reloc::Static`. If it does have a value," LLVM,RISCV,4105,"The next statement of this code snippet is: return RM.getValue();" LLVM,RISCV,4106,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `this->TargetMachine::TargetMachine(T, TT, CPU, FS, Options, RM, CM, OL);` This is a constructor call to the base class `TargetMachine`, passing in the same arguments as the constructor of the derived class `TargetMachine`. The `this` pointer is used to access the base class constructor, and the `TargetMachine` class name is used to specify the base class." LLVM,RISCV,4107,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `this->TargetMachine::TargetMachine(T, TT, CPU, FS, Options, RM, CM, OL);` This is a constructor call to the base class `TargetMachine`, passing in the same arguments as the constructor of the derived class `TargetMachine`. The `this` pointer is used to access the base class constructor, and the `TargetMachine` class name is used to specify the base class." LLVM,RISCV,4108,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be the initialization of the `AsmInfo` object, which is a member of the `TargetMachine` class. The `initAsmInfo()` method is called in the constructor of the `TargetMachine` class, and it is responsible for initializing the `AsmInfo` object with the appropriate values for the target machine. Therefore, the next statement of this code snippet is likely to be: ``` initAsmInfo(); ```" LLVM,RISCV,4109,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `TLOF = make_unique();` This statement creates a new instance of the `TargetObjectFile` class and assigns it to the `TLOF` variable. The `make_unique` function is used to create a unique pointer to the new object, which is then assigned to `TLOF`." LLVM,RISCV,4110,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the `addInstSelector` method is not specified. However, based on the name of the method and the fact that it is a member of the `PassConfig` class, it is likely that this method is used to add an instruction selector to the pass configuration. Without more information about the specific implementation of the `PassConfig` class and the `addInstSelector` method, it is not possible to provide a more detailed prediction of the next statement of this code snippet." LLVM,RISCV,4111,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `addPass` function and the `ISA_LIT` class. However, based on the syntax and the context of the code, it is likely that the next statement will be a call to the `run` method of the `ISA_LIT` object, which is returned by the `create` function. Here is an example of what the next statement might look like: ``` addPass ( createISelDag ( get" LLVM,RISCV,4112,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be: `addPass(createAtomicExpandPass());` This is because the `addIRPasses` method is adding passes to the pass manager, and the `createAtomicExpandPass` method creates a new pass that expands atomic operations. The `addPass` method is then called with the newly created pass as an argument, which adds the pass to the pass manager." LLVM,RISCV,4113,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the program depends on the specific implementation of the `PassConfig` class and the `addIRPasses` method. However, based on the name of the method and the fact that it is called within the `PassConfig` class, it is likely that this method is responsible for adding passes to the pass configuration. Therefore, the next statement of this code snippet could be any of the following: * A call to a method that adds a pass to the pass configuration, such as `addPass`" LLVM,RISCV,4114,"The next statement in this code snippet is: `addPass(&BranchRelaxationPassID);` This statement adds a pass to the pass manager, which is a class that manages the execution of passes in the compiler. The pass being added is the `BranchRelaxationPassID` pass, which is a pass that relaxes branches in the code." LLVM,RISCV,4115,"The next statement after the code snippet you provided is: `addPass ( createExpandPseudoPass ( ) ) ;` This statement creates a new pass using the `createExpandPseudoPass` function, and then adds it to the pass manager using the `addPass` function. The `createExpandPseudoPass` function creates a new pass that expands pseudo instructions in the input LLVM IR. The `addPass` function adds the new pass to the pass manager, which" LLVM,RISCV,4116,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the code is incomplete and the next statement depends on the implementation of the `PassConfig` class. However, based on the name of the method and the fact that it is a member function of the `PassConfig` class, it is likely that the next statement will be related to the configuration of a pass in a compiler or optimizer." LLVM,RISCV,4117,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return ;` This statement is reached if the condition `TT.isArch32Bit() && ` is true. The `return` statement will return the value of `` to the caller of the function." LLVM,RISCV,4118,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return new PassConfig ( * this , PM ) ;` This statement creates a new instance of the `PassConfig` class, passing in the current `TargetMachine` object (`*this`) and the `PassManagerBase` object (`PM`) as arguments. The `PassConfig` constructor is called with these arguments, and the resulting `PassConfig` object is returned from the `createPassConfig` method." LLVM,RISCV,4119,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return new PassConfig ( * this , PM ) ;` This statement creates a new instance of the `PassConfig` class, passing in the current `TargetMachine` object (`*this`) and the `PassManagerBase` object (`PM`) as arguments. The `PassConfig` constructor is called with these arguments, and the resulting `PassConfig` object is returned from the `createPassConfig` method." LLVM,RISCV,4120,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be a call to the `initialize` method of the `PassRegistry` class, passing in the `ISA_LIT` pseudo-instruction as an argument. This will initialize the `ExpandPseudoPass` pass with the `ISA_LIT` pseudo-instruction. Here's the predicted next statement: ``` PR->initializeExpandPseudoPass(); ```" LLVM,RISCV,4121,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `RegisterTargetMachineTargetMachine> X(getThe32Target());` This statement registers a target machine for the 32-bit ISA. The `getThe32Target()` function is called to get the 32-bit target, and the resulting target machine is registered with the `RegisterTargetMachine` function." LLVM,RISCV,4122,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `PassConfig` class and the `TargetPassConfig` class. However, based on the names of the classes and the parameters passed to the constructor, it is likely that the next statement will be a call to the `TargetPassConfig` constructor, which will initialize the `TargetPassConfig` object with the `TargetMachine` and `PassManagerBase` objects passed as parameters. Here is an example of what the next statement might look like: ``` TargetPassConfig(TM," LLVM,RISCV,4123,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `PassConfig` class and the `TargetPassConfig` class. However, based on the names of the classes and the parameters passed to the constructor, it is likely that the next statement will be a call to the `TargetPassConfig` constructor, which will initialize the `TargetPassConfig` object with the `TargetMachine` and `PassManagerBase` objects passed as parameters. Here is an example of what the next statement might look like: ``` TargetPassConfig(TM," LLVM,RISCV,4124,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `TLOF = make_unique < ELFTargetObjectFile > ( );` This statement creates a new instance of the `ELFTargetObjectFile` class and assigns it to the `TLOF` variable. The `make_unique` function is used to create a unique pointer to the new instance, which is then assigned to `TLOF`. The `ELFTargetObjectFile` class is a subclass of the `TargetObjectFile` class, and it is used to represent an ELF target" LLVM,RISCV,4125,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `TLOF = make_unique < ELFTargetObjectFile > ( );` This statement creates a new instance of the `ELFTargetObjectFile` class and assigns it to the `TLOF` variable. The `make_unique` function is used to create a unique pointer to the new instance, which is then assigned to `TLOF`. The `ELFTargetObjectFile` class is a subclass of the `TargetObjectFile` class, and it is used to represent an ELF target" LLVM,RISCV,4126,The next statement after the `if` statement is the `break` statement. The `break` statement will cause the loop to exit and the program will continue executing the statement after the loop. LLVM,RISCV,4127,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty because it depends on the specific values of the `ModuleFlags` container and the string literal ``. However, based on the code snippet, it appears that the next statement will be executed if the key of the current element in the `ModuleFlags` container is equal to the string literal ``. If this is the case, then the next statement will likely be a block of code that is executed when the key matches the string literal." LLVM,RISCV,4128,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `getContext` and `getELFSection` functions, as well as the contents of the `` string. However, based on the names of the functions and the parameters passed to them, it is likely that the next statement of this code snippet will be a call to the `getELFSection` function, passing in the `SmallBSSSection` variable as the first parameter, and the `ELF::SHT_NOBITS` and `" LLVM,RISCV,4129,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet without knowing the specific implementation of the `TargetLoweringObjectFileELF` class and the context in which it is being used. However, based on the name of the method and the parameters it is receiving, it is likely that the next statement will be related to the initialization of the object file for the target platform. Without more information, it is difficult to provide a more specific answer. If you have any additional context or details about the code snippet, I would be happy to try and provide a more accurate prediction." LLVM,RISCV,4130,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `if (Ty->isSized()) return false;` Explanation: The code snippet is checking if the `GlobalVariable` object `GVA` has a section, and if it does, it checks if the section is equal to `` or ``. If the section is not equal to either of those, it returns `false`. If the `GlobalVariable` object does not have a section, it checks if it has external linkage and is a declaration, or if it has common linkage" LLVM,RISCV,4131,"The next statement of this code snippet is: return Size > && Size <= SSThreshold;" LLVM,RISCV,4132,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `Kind` class and the `isData` and `isGlobalInSmallSection` functions. However, based on the names of the functions and the variables used, it is likely that the next statement will be a conditional statement that checks if the `Kind` is a data kind and if the global is in a small section. Here is a possible next statement: ``` if (Kind.isData() && isGlobalInSmallSection(GO, TM)) {" LLVM,RISCV,4133,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return RTM.getAlignmentForPreciseBounds(Size);`" LLVM,RISCV,4134,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `MCSection *section = getSectionForConstant(DL, Kind, C, Align);` This statement is calling the `getSectionForConstant` method on the `ELFTargetObjectFile` object, passing in the `DL` object, the `Kind` of section, the `C` constant, and the `Align` alignment. The method will return a pointer to an `MCSection` object, which will be stored in the `section` variable." LLVM,RISCV,4135,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return TargetLoweringObjectFileELF::getSectionForConstant(DL, Kind, C, Align);` This statement is reached if the `isConstantInSmallSection` function returns `false`, which means that the constant is not in the small data section. In this case, the `getSectionForConstant` function of the `TargetLoweringObjectFileELF` class is called to determine the section for the constant." LLVM,RISCV,4136,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `getContext` and `getELFSection` functions, as well as the contents of the ELF file being processed. However, based on the names of the functions and the parameters being passed to them, it is likely that the next statement of this code snippet will be a call to the `getELFSection` function to retrieve the contents of the ELF section with the specified name and type. The `getELFSection` function will likely return a pointer to the section data" LLVM,RISCV,4137,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be the initialization of the `ELFTargetObjectFile` object with the `MCContext` and `TargetMachine` objects. The `ELFTargetObjectFile` class is a subclass of the `TargetObjectFile` class, which is responsible for generating object files for the ELF (Executable and Linkable Format) file format. The `Initialize` method is called during the initialization of the `ELFTargetObjectFile` object, and it is used to set up the object file's internal state. The `MCContext` object is" LLVM,RISCV,4138,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `OS << << Attribute << << Twine ( Value ) << ;` This statement is emitting an attribute with the specified `Attribute` and `Value` to the output stream `OS`. The `Twine` class is used to convert the `Value` to a string, and the `` literals are used to add quotes around the attribute and value." LLVM,RISCV,4139,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be another call to the `OS` object's `<<` operator, which will append the next string literal to the output stream. The next string literal is likely to be a closing tag, such as ``, which will mark the end of the current attribute value. Therefore, the next statement of this code snippet is likely to be: ``` OS << << Attribute << << Twine ( Value ) << ; ``` This will" LLVM,RISCV,4140,"The next statement of this code snippet is: OS << ; This statement is an insertion operator, which inserts the string literal into the output stream OS." LLVM,RISCV,4141,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be the emission of the option directive with the ""no-pic"" option to the output stream. The `emitDirectiveOptionNoPIC` method is called when the assembler needs to emit a directive that specifies the ""no-pic"" option. The method takes no arguments and returns nothing. The method first checks if the assembler is in the ""no-pic"" mode, which is indicated by the `noPic` flag being set to `true`. If the assembler is in this mode, the method emits the ""no" LLVM,RISCV,4142,"The next statement of this code snippet is: OS << ; This statement is an insertion operator, which inserts the string literal into the output stream OS." LLVM,RISCV,4143,"The next statement of this code snippet is: OS << ; This statement is an insertion operator, which inserts the string literal into the output stream OS." LLVM,RISCV,4144,"The next statement of this code snippet is: OS << ; This statement is an insertion operator, which inserts the string literal into the output stream OS." LLVM,RISCV,4145,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be the emission of the option PIC directive to the output stream OS. The `emitDirectiveOptionPIC` method is a member function of the `TargetAsmStreamer` class, which is responsible for emitting assembly directives to the output stream. The method takes no arguments and does not return any value. The statement `OS << ;` is likely to be emitting the option PIC directive to the output stream OS. The `` placeholder is a string literal that represents the option PIC" LLVM,RISCV,4146,"The next statement of this code snippet is: OS << ; This statement is an insertion operator, which inserts the string literal into the output stream OS." LLVM,RISCV,4147,"The next statement of this code snippet is: OS << ; This statement is an insertion operator, which inserts the string literal into the output stream OS." LLVM,RISCV,4148,"The next statement of this code snippet is: OS << ; This statement is an insertion operator, which inserts the string literal into the output stream OS." LLVM,RISCV,4149,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be the emission of the directive option RVC to the output stream OS. The directive option RVC is used to specify the use of the RISC-V compressed instruction set. Therefore, the next statement of this code snippet is likely to be: OS << .rvc;" LLVM,RISCV,4150,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be the implementation of the `emitIntTextAttribute` method, which is a member function of the `TargetAsmStreamer` class. This method is responsible for emitting an integer text attribute with the specified attribute ID, integer value, and string value. The method will likely use the `emitAttribute` method of the `TargetAsmStreamer` class to emit the attribute, passing in the appropriate values for the attribute ID, integer value, and string value. The `emitAttribute` method will then write the attribute to the output stream in the appropriate format" LLVM,RISCV,4151,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be the implementation of the `emitIntTextAttribute` method, which is a member function of the `TargetAsmStreamer` class. This method is responsible for emitting an integer text attribute with the specified attribute ID, integer value, and string value. The method will likely use the `emitAttribute` method of the `TargetAsmStreamer` class to emit the attribute, passing in the appropriate values for the attribute ID, integer value, and string value. The `emitAttribute` method will then write the attribute to the output stream in the appropriate format" LLVM,RISCV,4152,"Based on the code snippet, it appears that the next statement will be: `emitAttribute(, );` This is because the `emitTargetAttributes` function is checking if the `STI` object has a certain feature, and if it does, it will emit an attribute with the specified name and value. If the feature is not present, it will emit a different attribute with a different name and value. The `ParseResult` variable is then assigned the result of parsing the feature bits, and if there is an error, it will report a fatal error" LLVM,RISCV,4153,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `OS << << Attribute << << String << ;` This statement is emitting a text attribute to the output stream `OS`. The attribute is represented by the `Attribute` parameter, and the value of the attribute is represented by the `String` parameter. The `` placeholder is used to indicate that the value of the attribute should be enclosed in double quotes." LLVM,RISCV,4154,"The next statement in the code snippet is: `finishAttributeSection();`" LLVM,RISCV,4155,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the context in which the code is being executed and the specific implementation of the `finishAttributeSection` function. However, based on the name of the function, it is likely that it is related to the completion of an attribute section in a larger program or application, and the next statement may involve the processing or handling of the completed attribute section." LLVM,RISCV,4156,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `TargetAsmStreamer` class and the context in which it is being used. However, based on the name of the method and the fact that it is called `finishAttributeSection`, it is likely that the next statement will be related to the completion or finalization of an attribute section in the assembly code. This could involve writing a closing brace or other syntax element to indicate the end of the attribute section, or it could involve performing some other action to finalize the section. Without more" LLVM,RISCV,4157,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `TargetAsmStreamer` class and the context in which it is being used. However, based on the name of the method and the fact that it is called `finishAttributeSection`, it is likely that the next statement will be related to the completion or finalization of an attribute section in the assembly code. This could involve writing a closing brace or other syntax element to indicate the end of the attribute section, or it could involve performing some other action to finalize the section. Without more" LLVM,RISCV,4158,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the `reset` method is not specified in the code snippet provided. However, based on the name of the method and the fact that it is a member function of a class called `TargetStreamer`, it is likely that the method is intended to reset the state of the `TargetStreamer` object to some default or initial state. Without more information about the specific implementation of the `TargetStreamer` class, it is not possible to provide a more specific prediction about the behavior of the `reset` method." LLVM,RISCV,4159,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the `reset` method is not specified in the code snippet provided. However, based on the name of the method and the fact that it is a member function of a class called `TargetStreamer`, it is likely that the method is intended to reset the state of the `TargetStreamer` object to some default or initial state. Without more information about the specific implementation of the `TargetStreamer` class, it is not possible to provide a more specific prediction about the behavior of the `reset` method." LLVM,RISCV,4160,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `OS.SetStreamer(S);` This statement sets the streamer for the `OS` object to `S`, which is the `MCStreamer` object passed as an argument to the constructor." LLVM,RISCV,4161,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `OS.SetStreamer(S);` This statement sets the streamer for the `OS` object to `S`, which is the `MCStreamer` object passed as an argument to the constructor." LLVM,RISCV,4162,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `TargetStreamer` class and the `MCStreamer` class. However, based on the names of the classes and the fact that `TargetStreamer` is derived from `MCTargetStreamer`, it is likely that the next statement will be a call to the constructor of the `MCTargetStreamer` class, passing in the `MCStreamer` object `S` as an argument. Here is an example of what the next statement might look like: ```" LLVM,RISCV,4163,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `TargetStreamer` class and the `MCStreamer` class. However, based on the names of the classes and the fact that `TargetStreamer` is derived from `MCTargetStreamer`, it is likely that the next statement will be a call to the constructor of the `MCTargetStreamer` class, passing in the `MCStreamer` object `S` as an argument. Here is an example of what the next statement might look like: ```" LLVM,RISCV,4164,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `assert(ABI != && );` This statement is an assertion that checks whether the value of `ABI` is not equal to both `` and ``. If the assertion fails, the program will abort with an error message." LLVM,RISCV,4165,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be the emission of the `CapMode` directive to the output stream `OS`. The directive is represented by the string literal ``, which is not specified in the code snippet provided. Therefore, the next statement of this code snippet is likely to be: ``` OS << << ""CapMode""; ``` This statement emits the `CapMode` directive to the output stream `OS`, which is the purpose of the `emitDirectiveOptionCapMode` function." LLVM,RISCV,4166,"The next statement of this code snippet is: OS << ; This statement is an insertion operator, which inserts the string literal into the output stream OS." LLVM,RISCV,4167,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `TargetAsmStreamer` class and the `emitDirectiveOptionNoCapMode` method. However, based on the name of the method and the contents of the string literal, it is likely that the next statement will be related to emitting an assembly directive related to the `no-cap-mode` option." LLVM,RISCV,4168,"Based on the code snippet provided, it is difficult to predict the next statement with certainty. However, based on the pattern of the code, it is likely that the next statement will be another `if` statement that checks if `STI` has a certain feature, and if so, adds a string literal to the `Arch` variable. Here is a possible next statement: ``` if (STI.hasFeature("""")) Arch += """"; ``` It is important to note that the `` placeholder is used to represent a string" LLVM,RISCV,4169,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `if (STI.hasFeature()) Arch += ;` This is because the previous statement was an `if` statement that checked if `STI` has a feature represented by ``. If the feature is present, the `Arch` variable is assigned the value of ``. If the feature is not present, the `Arch` variable is not modified. Therefore, the next statement is another `if` statement that checks if `ST" LLVM,RISCV,4170,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific values of the variables and the behavior of the `hasFeature` method. However, based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the next statement will be: `emitAttribute(, );` This is because the code snippet ends with a call to the `emitAttribute` method, and the next statement is likely to be the next call to this method. However, without more information about the specific values of the variables and the behavior of the `" LLVM,RISCV,4171,"The next statement in this code snippet is: `emitTextAttribute(, ISAInfo->toString());` This statement is calling the `emitTextAttribute` function with two arguments: a string literal and the result of the `toString()` method called on the `ISAInfo` object. The `ISAInfo` object is a member of the `ParseResult` object, which is the result of the `llvm::` function call. The `toString()` method is likely to return a string representation of the `ISAInfo` object, which" LLVM,RISCV,4172,"Based on the code snippet you provided, it appears to be a part of a larger program that is parsing a feature vector. The code is using the `std::vector` container to store the feature bits, and the `llvm::` namespace is being used to represent the LLVM IR. The next statement in the code snippet is: ``` auto ParseResult = llvm::(XLen, FeatureVector); ``` This line is creating a new `ParseResult` object using the `llvm::` constructor, which is a constructor that" LLVM,RISCV,4173,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty because it appears to be a fragment of a larger program. However, based on the syntax and structure of the code, it is likely that the next statement will be another `if` statement, similar to the ones shown in the code snippet. The code appears to be checking the presence of certain features in a `STI` object, and if those features are present, it is adding a string literal to an `Arch` object. The exact nature of the `STI` and `Arch` objects, as well as the specific features" LLVM,RISCV,4174,"Based on the code snippet you provided, it appears to be a part of a larger program that is checking for the presence of certain features in a system and adding them to a string called ""Arch"" if they are present. The next statement in the code snippet would likely be the next check for a feature using the `hasFeature` method, followed by the addition of the feature to the ""Arch"" string if it is present. Here is an example of what the next statement might look like: ``` if (STI.hasFeature("""")) Arch += ""InstructionOpcodeToISD(Opcode)`. The `case` statements within the `switch` block are checking for specific values of `ISD`, and the code snippet you provided only shows the first two `case` statements. It is not possible to determine the exact next statement without knowing the value of `ISD` and the other `case" LLVM,RISCV,4180,"Based on the code snippet you provided, it appears that the next statement will be: `return Cost + (LT.first - );` This statement is inside the `case :` block, which is executed when the `ICA.getID()` method returns a value that is equal to ``. The `Cost` variable is initialized to `` and the `LT` variable is assigned the result of the `TLI->getTypeLegalizationCost(DL, RetTy)` method. The `return" LLVM,RISCV,4181,"The next statement after the `if` statement will be the `return` statement inside the `if` block, which returns the result of the `getMaskedMemoryOpCost` function." LLVM,RISCV,4182,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return getMemoryOpCost(Opcode, Src, Alignment, AddressSpace, CostKind);`" LLVM,RISCV,4183,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the program depends on the specific implementation of the `getMaxInterleaveFactor` method and the value of the `VF` parameter. However, based on the name of the method and the fact that it is called on an object named `ST`, it is likely that the method returns the maximum interleave factor for a given vectorization factor. The `VF` parameter is likely used to specify the vectorization factor for which the maximum interleave factor is requested. Therefore, the next" LLVM,RISCV,4184,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return MaxVectorSizeInBits / ;` This is because the `if` statement checks if `ST -> hasVInstructions()` is true and `MaxVectorSizeInBits` is not equal to ``. If both conditions are true, the code inside the `if` block will be executed, which includes the `return` statement." LLVM,RISCV,4185,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be: `BaseCost = BaseCost + LT.first * VL;` This is because the code is calculating the cost of a reduction operation on a vector of fixed length, and it needs to add the cost of the legalization of the vector type to the base cost. The `getTypeLegalizationCost` function returns a pair containing the cost of legalizing the type and the legalized type, and the code is using the first element of the pair (i.e., the cost) to update the base cost. The `VL" LLVM,RISCV,4186,"The next statement in the code snippet is: `return TypeSize :: getScalable ( ST -> hasStdExtV ( ) ? : ) ;` This statement is part of a `switch` statement that is checking the value of `TargetTransformInfo`. If `TargetTransformInfo` is equal to `RGK_ScalableVector`, then the statement `return TypeSize :: getScalable ( ST -> hasStdExtV ( ) ? : ) ;` will be" LLVM,RISCV,4187,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the code depends on the specific values of the variables and the implementation of the `TypeSize` and `TargetTransformInfo` classes. However, based on the information provided, it is likely that the next statement will be a call to the `getFixed` method of the `TypeSize` class, passing the result of the `getXLen` method of the `ST` class as an argument. The `getFixed` method is likely to return a fixed-width vector, which will be used in the" LLVM,RISCV,4188,"This code snippet is from the LLVM project and is related to the implementation of the TargetTransformInfo class. The method `getRegUsageForType` is used to determine the register usage for a given type. The code snippet you provided is incomplete, so it's difficult to predict the next statement with certainty. However, based on the context, it seems likely that the next statement would be a return statement that returns the register usage for the given type. Here's a possible completion of the code snippet: ``` unsigned TTIImpl :: getRegUsage" LLVM,RISCV,4189,"The next statement after the code snippet you provided is likely to be: `return LT.first * ;` This is because the code snippet you provided is checking the type of the instruction and returning a value based on that type. The `return` statement is used to return a value from a function, and the `LT.first` expression is used to access the first element of the `LT` pair, which is the instruction cost. The `` expression is likely to be a constant value that represents the number of literals in the instruction." LLVM,RISCV,4190,"The next statement after the `if` block is: `return BaseT::getShuffleCost(Kind, Tp, Mask, Index, SubTp);` This statement is executed if the `Kind` is not `TTI::SK_Splice` or `TTI::SK_Broadcast`, or if the `Tp` is not a `ScalableVectorType`." LLVM,RISCV,4191,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the program depends on the specific inputs and the implementation of the `TTIImpl` class. However, based on the name of the method and the parameters, it appears that the method is trying to retrieve the cost of a splice operation for a vector type. The method takes two parameters: a pointer to a `VectorType` object and an integer index. It is likely that the method will use the index to access an element of the vector and then calculate the cost of the splice operation based on the properties" LLVM,RISCV,4192,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `getTypeLegalizationCost` method and the values of the variables `DL` and `Tp`. However, based on the names of the variables and the context of the code, it is likely that the next statement will be related to calculating the cost of splicing the vector type `Tp` at the specified index `Index`. One possible next statement could be: ``` Cost += TLI->getSpliceCost(DL, Tp, Index); ```" LLVM,RISCV,4193,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `LLVM_DEBUG(dbgs() << ""Cost: "" << Cost << "" Partial: "" << UP.Partial << ""\n"");` This statement is a debug print statement that prints the cost of the loop and whether the partial loop unrolling is enabled or not. The `LLVM_DEBUG` macro is used to guard the debug print statement, which means that it will only be executed when the `LLVM_DEBUG` macro is defined." LLVM,RISCV,4194,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the `isLegalMaskedGather` function depends on the specific implementation of the `Type` class and the `Alignment` parameter. However, based on the name of the function and the parameters it takes, it is likely that the function checks whether a masked gather operation is legal for the given data type and alignment. If the function is implemented correctly, it should return `true` if the masked gather operation is legal and `false` otherwise. The exact behavior of the function will depend on the" LLVM,RISCV,4195,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return isLegalMaskedGatherScatter(DataType, Alignment);` This statement returns the result of the `isLegalMaskedGatherScatter` function, which is a boolean value indicating whether the specified data type and alignment are legal for a masked gather operation." LLVM,RISCV,4196,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return isLegalElementTypeForRVV(DataType->getScalarType());` This statement is reached if the previous conditions in the `if` statements are not met, and it returns the result of the `isLegalElementTypeForRVV` function called on the scalar type of the `DataType` object." LLVM,RISCV,4197,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet without knowing the context and the definition of the `isLegalMaskedLoadStore` function. However, based on the name of the function, it appears to be checking whether a load or store operation with the given data type and alignment is legal. Therefore, the next statement of this code snippet could be a conditional statement that checks the result of the `isLegalMaskedLoadStore` function and takes appropriate action based on the result. For example, it could be a statement that raises an exception if the operation is not legal, or it" LLVM,RISCV,4198,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet without knowing the context and the definition of the `isLegalMaskedLoadStore` function. However, based on the name of the function, it appears to be checking whether a load or store operation with the given data type and alignment is legal. Therefore, the next statement of this code snippet could be a conditional statement that checks the result of the `isLegalMaskedLoadStore` function and takes appropriate action based on the result. For example, it could be a statement that raises an exception if the operation is not legal, or it" LLVM,RISCV,4199,"The next statement after the `if` statement is: `if (Alignment < DL.getTypeStoreSize(DataType->getScalarType()).getFixedSize()) return false;` This statement checks if the alignment of the data type is less than the fixed size of the scalar type. If it is, the function returns `false`." LLVM,RISCV,4200,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return false;` The `if` statement checks if the `hasStdExtV` method returns `false`, and if the `DataType` is a `FixedVectorType` and the minimum required vector size in bits is equal to ``. If any of these conditions are not met, the method returns `false`." LLVM,RISCV,4201,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `isLegalMaskedGatherScatter` function and the values of the `DataType` and `Alignment` parameters. However, based on the name of the function and the parameters passed to it, it is likely that the function is checking whether a gather or scatter operation is legal for the given data type and alignment. If the operation is legal, the function may return a boolean value indicating that the operation is legal. Therefore, the next statement of this code snippet" LLVM,RISCV,4202,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the function `isLegalMaskedStore` depends on the specific implementation of the function and the values of the input parameters `DataType` and `Alignment`. However, based on the name of the function and the parameters, it is likely that the function is checking whether a masked store operation is legal for the given data type and alignment. A masked store operation is a type of store operation that stores a value to memory while simultaneously masking out certain bits of the value, typically to avoid storing certain values" LLVM,RISCV,4203,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `case RecurKind::Mul: case RecurKind::FMul: case RecurKind::UDiv: case RecurKind::SDiv: case RecurKind::FDiv: case RecurKind::URem: case RecurKind::SRem: case RecurKind::FRem:`" LLVM,RISCV,4204,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the `supportsScalableVectors` function is not specified. However, based on the name of the function, it is likely that it returns a boolean value indicating whether the vector supports scalable vectors. In C++, a vector is a dynamic array that can grow or shrink in size as elements are added or removed. A scalable vector is a vector that can grow or shrink in size in a way that is proportional to the size of the vector. For example, if a vector has a capacity of" LLVM,RISCV,4205,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the `supportsScalableVectors` function is not specified. However, based on the name of the function, it is likely that it returns a boolean value indicating whether the vector supports scalable vectors. In C++, a vector is a dynamic array that can grow or shrink in size as elements are added or removed. A scalable vector is a vector that can grow or shrink in size in a way that is proportional to the size of the vector. For example, if a vector has a capacity of" LLVM,RISCV,4206,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return TTI::TCC_Free;` This is because the `if` statement that follows the `switch` statement is not executed, so the `return` statement at the end of the `switch` statement is reached and executed. The `TTI::TCC_Free` value is returned as the result of the `getIntImmCost` function." LLVM,RISCV,4207,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific values of the variables and the behavior of the functions involved. However, based on the information provided, it appears that the code is checking whether the `DataType` is a fixed vector type and whether the minimum required vector size in bits is equal to a specific value (represented by ``). If these conditions are met, the function returns `false`. If the conditions are not met, the function may return `true` or may execute other statements that are not shown in the code snippet." LLVM,RISCV,4208,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `if (isLegalMaskedLoadStore(DataType, Alignment)) { ... }` This is because the function `isLegalMaskedLoadStore` is called with the arguments `DataType` and `Alignment`, and the return value of the function is used to determine whether the next statement should be executed. If the return value is `true`, then the next statement will be executed, otherwise it will be skipped." LLVM,RISCV,4209,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `if (Alignment < DL.getTypeStoreSize(DataType->getScalarType()).getFixedSize()) return false;` This statement checks if the alignment of the data type is less than the fixed size of the store size of the scalar type of the data type. If the alignment is less than the fixed size, the function returns false." LLVM,RISCV,4210,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return TTI::TCC_Free;` Explanation: The `getIntImmCost` function is called with three arguments: `Imm`, `Ty`, and `CostKind`. The function first asserts that `Ty` is an integer type and then checks if `Imm` is equal to `0`. If `Imm` is equal to `0`, the function returns `TTI::TCC_Free`, which is a constant representing a free operation. If `Imm` is not equal to" LLVM,RISCV,4211,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the program depends on the specific inputs and the implementation of the `getDataLayout()` function. However, based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the `getDataLayout()` function is being called to retrieve the data layout of the current program. The returned value is then stored in a constant reference to a `DataLayout` object named `DL`." LLVM,RISCV,4212,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty because it depends on the value of the variable `ST` and the function `useRVVForFixedLengthVectors`. However, based on the syntax and the fact that the function is called with no arguments, it is likely that the next statement will be a return statement that returns either the value of `NUM_LIT` or the value of `NUM_LIT` depending on the value of `ST`. It is also possible that the function `useRVVForFixedLengthVectors` has some side" LLVM,RISCV,4213,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the `hasVInstructions` method and the value of the `` constant are not specified. However, based on the syntax and the context in which the code appears, it is likely that the next statement will be a return statement that returns a value of type `NUM_LIT`." LLVM,RISCV,4214,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return false;` The first `if` statement checks if the `DataType` is a fixed-length vector and its scalar size is greater than the maximum element length for fixed-length vectors. If this condition is true, the function returns `false`. The second `if` statement checks if the alignment of the `DataType` is less than the fixed size of the type store for the scalar type of the `DataType`. If this condition is true, the function returns `false`. Therefore, the next statement of this code snippet" LLVM,RISCV,4215,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return false;` The `if` statement checks if the `ST` object has any instructions, and if it does not, it returns `false`. The second `if` statement checks if the `DataType` is a fixed vector type and if the minimum required vector vector size in bits is equal to ``. If both conditions are true, it returns `false`. Otherwise, it continues to the next statement." LLVM,RISCV,4216,"The next statement after the `if` block is the `return` statement. The `return` statement will return the value of the `if` expression, which is `false` in this case." LLVM,RISCV,4217,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return false;` This is because the code checks for various conditions using `if` statements, and if any of these conditions are not met, the function returns `false`. If all the conditions are met, the function will continue to execute the next statement, which is the `return` statement." LLVM,RISCV,4218,"The next statement after the `switch` block will be the `default` case, which is `return false`." LLVM,RISCV,4219,"The next statement of the code snippet is: `return false;` Explanation: The code snippet is checking if the recurrence is a legal element type for RVV (Recurrence Vectorization) and if the recurrence kind is one of the supported kinds (e.g. addition, subtraction, etc.). If the recurrence is not a legal element type or the recurrence kind is not supported, the function returns `false`. Otherwise, the function returns `true`." LLVM,RISCV,4220,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the implementation of the `hasVInstructions()` method and the state of the `ST` object. However, based on the syntax and the fact that the method is called on the `ST` object, it is likely that the next statement will be a conditional statement that checks the return value of the `hasVInstructions()` method." LLVM,RISCV,4221,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the `supportsScalableVectors` function is not specified. However, based on the name of the function, it is likely that it returns a boolean value indicating whether the vector supports scalable vectors. In C++, a vector is a dynamic array that can grow or shrink in size as elements are added or removed. A scalable vector is a vector that can grow or shrink in size in a way that is proportional to the size of the vector. For example, if a vector has a capacity of" LLVM,RISCV,4222,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet without knowing the specific implementation of the `getIntImmCost` function and the context in which it is being called. However, based on the function signature and the variables being passed in, it is likely that the next statement will involve some calculation or manipulation of the `Imm` variable, which is an `APInt` object. Without more information, it is not possible to provide a more specific prediction of the next statement. If you have any additional context or information about the code snippet, I would be happy to try and provide a more" LLVM,RISCV,4223,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return ST -> hasStdExtV ( ) ? ST -> getMinRVVVectorSizeInBits ( ) : ;` This statement is a ternary operator, which is a shorthand for an if-else statement. The condition is `ST -> hasStdExtV ( )`, which checks if the `ST` object has a standard extension vector. If the condition is true, the expression `ST -> getMinRVVVectorSizeInBits ( )` is evaluated and returned." LLVM,RISCV,4224,"The next statement after the `if` block is: `return false;` This is because the `if` block is checking if the `DataType` is a `FixedVectorType` and if the scalar size in bits of the `DataType` is greater than the maximum element length for fixed-length vectors. If this condition is true, the function returns `false`." LLVM,RISCV,4225,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return false;` Explanation: The code snippet is a part of a function that checks if a loop contains a hardware loop intrinsic. The function uses a recursive approach to scan the loop and its inner loops. The `ScanLoop` function takes a `Loop*` argument and returns a `bool` indicating whether the loop contains a hardware loop intrinsic. The function first initializes a `hasInnerHardwareLoop` variable to `false`. Then, it iterates over the inner loops of the current loop using a `for`" LLVM,RISCV,4226,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `Cost += getInstructionCost(I);`" LLVM,RISCV,4227,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `Cost = getInstructionCost(L, SE, UP, ORE);`" LLVM,RISCV,4228,"The next statement of this code snippet is: return ST -> getMinRVVVectorSizeInBits ( ) ;" LLVM,RISCV,4229,"The next statement in the code snippet is: `return TypeSize::getFixed(ST->getXLen());` This is because the `switch` statement is checking the value of `TargetTransformInfo::RGK_FixedWidthVector`, and since it is not equal to `TargetTransformInfo::RGK_ScalableVector`, the first `case` statement is executed, which returns the result of `TypeSize::getFixed(ST->getXLen())`." LLVM,RISCV,4230,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific input and the implementation of the `TargetTransformInfo` class. However, based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the next statement will be a call to the `llvm_unreachable` function, which is a function that is never expected to return. The `llvm_unreachable` function is typically used to indicate that a particular code path is unreachable, and is often used in conjunction with the `llvm_unreachable` attribute to" LLVM,RISCV,4231,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be: `const int BitWidth = Ty->getIntegerBitWidth();` This is because the code is checking if `Ty` is an integer type and then getting the bit width of the integer type. The `getIntegerBitWidth()` method is a member function of the `IntegerType` class in LLVM, which is a subclass of the `Type` class. The `Ty` variable is of type `Type*`, so it is likely that it is being used to store a pointer to an `IntegerType` object. The `getIntegerBit" LLVM,RISCV,4232,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `ImmArgIdx = ;` This is because the `Takes12BitImm` variable is set to `true` in the `case Instruction :: Mul` block, and the `ImmArgIdx` variable is set to `` in the `case Instruction :: Sub` block. Therefore, the `ImmArgIdx` variable will be set to `` if the `Takes12BitImm` variable is `true`." LLVM,RISCV,4233,"The next statement of this code snippet is: Takes12BitImm = true; Explanation: The code snippet is a part of a function named ""getIntImmCostInst"" that is a member of a class named ""TTIImpl"". The function takes several parameters, including ""Opcode"", ""Idx"", ""Imm"", ""Ty"", ""CostKind"", and ""Inst"". The function first asserts that ""Ty"" is an integer type and then checks if ""Imm"" is equal to a specific value. If ""Imm"" is equal to" LLVM,RISCV,4234,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return TTI::TCC_Free;` This is because the `getIntImmCostIntrin` function is returning the value of the `TTI::TCC_Free` constant, which is a member of the `TTI` class. The `TTI::TCC_Free` constant represents the cost of an intrinsic instruction that is considered to be free, meaning that it does not incur any additional cost beyond the cost of the instruction itself." LLVM,RISCV,4235,"Based on the code snippet provided, it is difficult to predict the next statement with certainty. However, based on the context and the information provided, it is likely that the next statement will be a continuation of the loop, with the `InstrCount` variable being incremented and the next instruction in the basic block being processed. The code snippet appears to be part of a function that is analyzing the instructions in a basic block and determining whether they can be lowered to a library call. The function is using the `TargetLowering` class to get information about the instructions and their types, and it" LLVM,RISCV,4236,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `if (I.isTerminator()) return false;` This statement checks if the current instruction is a terminator instruction (i.e., it ends the basic block). If it is, the function returns `false`. If it is not, the function continues to the next statement." LLVM,RISCV,4237,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `shouldFavorPostInc` method and the state of the `ST` object. However, based on the name of the method and the fact that it is checking for the presence of a certain extension, it is likely that the next statement will be a conditional statement that determines whether to favor post-increment or not based on the result of the `hasExtXCoreVMem` method." LLVM,RISCV,4238,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `shouldFavorPostInc` method and the state of the `ST` object. However, based on the name of the method and the fact that it is checking for the presence of a certain extension, it is likely that the next statement will be a conditional statement that determines whether to favor post-increment or not based on the result of the `hasExtXCoreVMem` method." LLVM,RISCV,4239,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return getIntImmCost(Imm, Ty);` This is because the `if` statement that checks `Takes12BitImm` is false, so the code will execute the `else` block, which contains the `return` statement." LLVM,RISCV,4240,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be a return statement, as the function `getIntImmCostIntrin` is expected to return a value of type `TargetCostKind` (which is an alias for `int`). The return statement is likely to be `return TTI::TCC_Free;`, as the function is returning the value of the `TCC_Free` constant from the `TTI` namespace. This constant is likely to be defined as a member of the `TargetCostKind` enum, and its value is likely to be `0`, which is the default" LLVM,RISCV,4241,"The next statement after the `if` statement is: `return divideCeil(Size, ST->getMinRVVVectorSizeInBits());` This statement is executed if the `if` condition is true, which means that `ST->useRVVForFixedLengthVectors()` returns `true`. In this case, the function `divideCeil` is called with the `Size` and the minimum RVV vector size in bits as arguments, and the result is returned." LLVM,RISCV,4242,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the implementation of the `getPrimitiveSizeInBits` and `isVectorTy` methods. However, based on the names of these methods, it is likely that the next statement will be related to the size of the type `Ty`. Here are a few possibilities: * The next statement could be a call to `getPrimitiveSizeInBits` with the `Ty` argument, which would return the size of the type in bits. * The next statement could be a call to" LLVM,RISCV,4243,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be: `Cost += getUserCost(&I, Operands, TargetTransformInfo::TCK_SizeAndLatency);` This is because the previous statement is a `for` loop that iterates over the operands of an instruction `I`, and the current statement is the increment of the `Cost` variable. The `getUserCost` function is called with the instruction `I` and its operands as arguments, and the result is added to the `Cost` variable." LLVM,RISCV,4244,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be: `return getRVVArithmeticReductionCost(Opcode, VTy, FMF, CostKind);` This is because the code checks the type of the vector and the size of the scalar elements, and if they meet certain conditions, it calls the `getRVVArithmeticReductionCost` function to get the cost of the arithmetic reduction operation." LLVM,RISCV,4245,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be a call to the `getArithmeticReductionCost` method of the `BaseT` class, passing in the `Opcode`, `VTy`, `FMF`, and `CostKind` parameters. The method will then calculate the cost of the arithmetic reduction operation for the given parameters and return the result." LLVM,RISCV,4246,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `case : case : case : if ( std :: abs ( PowDiff ) <= ) return ; if ( Src -> isIntOrIntVectorTy ( ) ) return ; return std :: abs ( PowDiff ) ; }` This is a case statement that checks if the absolute value of `PowDiff` is less than or equal to a certain value, and if `Src" LLVM,RISCV,4247,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `getMinMaxReductionCost` function and the values of the variables involved. However, based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the next statement will be a return statement, as the function has already checked for several conditions and has not yet reached the end of the function. The `getMinMaxReductionCost` function appears to be calculating the cost of a reduction operation on a vector of fixed length. The function takes several parameters, including the type of the vector (`" LLVM,RISCV,4248,"The next statement after the `if` statement is the `return` statement. The `return` statement will return the result of the `getSpliceCost` function, which is called with the `Tp` and `Index` parameters." LLVM,RISCV,4249,"The next statement in this code snippet is: `return TypeSize :: getFixed ( ST -> hasStdExtV ( ) ? ST -> getMinRVVVectorSizeInBits ( ) : ) ;` This statement is a return statement that returns a `TypeSize` object representing a fixed-width vector. The `getFixed` method is called on the `TypeSize` class, and it takes a single argument which is a function that returns the minimum vector size in bits. The function is defined as `ST -> hasStdExtV ( ) ?" LLVM,RISCV,4250,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of the code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `TargetTransformInfo` class and the `getXLen` method. However, based on the context and the naming conventions used in the code, it is likely that the next statement will be a call to the `getFixed` method of the `TypeSize` class, passing in the result of the `getXLen` method as an argument. Here is a possible continuation of the code snippet: ``` case TargetTransformInfo :: RGK_FixedWidthVector :" LLVM,RISCV,4251,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return false;` The `if` statement checks if the `hasStdExtV` method returns `false`, and if the `DataType` is a `FixedVectorType` and the minimum required vector size in bits is equal to ``. If any of these conditions are not met, the method returns `false`." LLVM,RISCV,4252,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return false;` The `if` statement checks if the `hasStdExtV` method returns `false`, and if the `DataType` is a `FixedVectorType` and the minimum required vector size in bits is equal to ``. If any of these conditions are not met, the method returns `false`." LLVM,RISCV,4253,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific values of the variables and the behavior of the functions involved. However, based on the information provided, it appears that the code is checking whether the `DataType` is a fixed vector type and whether the minimum required vector size in bits is equal to a specific value (represented by ``). If these conditions are met, the function returns `false`. If the conditions are not met, the function may return `true` or may execute other statements that are not shown in the code snippet." LLVM,RISCV,4254,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `RdxDesc` class and the values of its member variables. However, based on the code provided, it appears that the next statement will be a case statement that checks the value of `RdxDesc.getRecurrenceKind()`. The `getRecurrenceKind()` method is called on the `RdxDesc` object, and its return value is used to determine which case statement to execute. The possible values of `RecurKind` are `Add`, `Sub`, `Mul" LLVM,RISCV,4255,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `if ( Instruction :: isCommutative ( Opcode ) || Idx == ImmArgIdx ) {` This is because the `if` statement is checking whether the instruction is commutative or if the index of the immediate argument is equal to the `ImmArgIdx` variable. If either of these conditions is true, then the next statement will be executed." LLVM,RISCV,4256,"The next statement after the `if` statement is: `return false;` This is because the `if` statement is checking if the `DataType` is a `FixedVectorType` and if its scalar size in bits is greater than the `ELEN` of the `ST`. If this condition is true, the function returns `false`. If the condition is false, the next statement will be executed, which is the `if` statement checking if the `Alignment` is less than the `getFixedSize()` of the `DL.getTypeStoreSize()` of the `DataType`'s" LLVM,RISCV,4257,"The next statement after the `if` block is the `return` statement. The `return` statement will return the value of the `if` expression, which is `false` in this case." LLVM,RISCV,4258,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `if (Alignment < DL.getTypeStoreSize(DataType->getScalarType()).getFixedSize()) return false;` This statement checks if the alignment of the data type is less than the fixed size of the data type's scalar type, as returned by the `getTypeStoreSize` method of the `DataLayout` class. If the alignment is less than the fixed size, the function returns `false`." LLVM,RISCV,4259,"The next statement after the `if` block is the `return` statement. The `return` statement will return the value of the `if` expression, which is `false` in this case." LLVM,RISCV,4260,"The next statement of the code snippet is: `return false;` Explanation: The `isLegalToVectorizeReduction` function is checking whether a reduction operation can be vectorized. It first checks if the reduction variable is scalable, and if it is not, it returns `true`. If the reduction variable is scalable, it checks if the reduction type is legal for reduction vectorization using the `TLI->isLegalElementTypeForRVV` function. If the reduction type is not legal, it returns `false`. If the reduction type is legal," LLVM,RISCV,4261,"The next statement of the code snippet is likely to be: `if (Opcode == Instruction::Gather || Opcode == Instruction::Scatter) {` This is because the `getGatherScatterOpCost` function is called with the `Opcode` parameter, which is an `unsigned` value that represents the opcode of the instruction. The function checks if the `Opcode` is equal to `Instruction::Gather` or `Instruction::Scatter`, which are the opcodes for the gather and scatter instructions. If the `Opcode` matches either of" LLVM,RISCV,4262,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be: `unsigned NumLoads = VTy -> getNumElements ( ) ;` This line of code is accessing the `getNumElements()` method of the `FixedVectorType` class, which is a subclass of `Type`. The `getNumElements()` method returns the number of elements in the vector type. The `NumLoads` variable is then assigned the value returned by this method." LLVM,RISCV,4263,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be a conditional statement, such as an `if` or `switch` statement, that checks the value of the `Imm` parameter and returns a value based on that value. Without more context, it is not possible to determine the exact next statement with certainty." LLVM,RISCV,4264,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return TTI::TCC_Free;` This is because the `if` statement that precedes it checks whether the instruction is commutative or if the immediate argument index is equal to the index of the immediate operand. If either of these conditions is true, and the immediate value has a minimum signed bit width of 12 or less, and the target machine's legal add immediate value is legal, then the instruction is considered to be free of cost. Therefore, if the `if` statement evaluates to true, the `return" LLVM,RISCV,4265,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return BaseT::getMaxVScale();` This is because the `if` statement checks if `ST->hasStdExtV()` and `MaxVectorSizeInBits != `, and if both conditions are true, it returns `MaxVectorSizeInBits / `. However, if either condition is false, it returns `BaseT::getMaxVScale()`." LLVM,RISCV,4266,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be a call to a function that checks whether the width of the type is a power of 2 and less than or equal to 32. The function name is likely to be `isPowerOf2_32`. The `` in the code snippet suggests that the function takes a string literal as an argument. Therefore, the next statement of this code snippet is likely to be: ``` assert(isPowerOf2_32(TyWidth) && ); ```" LLVM,RISCV,4267,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be a return statement, as it is the last statement in the function. The function `getPopcntSupport` is expected to return a value of type `PopcntSupportKind`, which is an enumeration that represents the level of support for the `popcnt` instruction on the target ISA. The function takes an unsigned integer argument `TyWidth`, which is the width of the type being queried. The function uses this argument to determine the level of support for the `popcnt` instruction on the target ISA. Based on the information provided" LLVM,RISCV,4268,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the `getST` function is dependent on the specific implementation of the `ISA_LIT` class and the `Subtarget` class. However, based on the naming conventions used in the code snippet, it is likely that the `getST` function is intended to return a pointer to a `Subtarget` object that is associated with the current `ISA_LIT` object. The `getST` function may be used to retrieve the `Subtarget` object that is associated with the" LLVM,RISCV,4269,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `getST` function and the value of the `ST` variable. However, based on the code snippet you provided, it appears that the `getST` function is returning a pointer to a `Subtarget` object. The `ST` variable is likely a member variable of the class that contains the `getST` function, and it is being returned by the function. Without more information about the specific implementation of the code, it is not possible to provide a more" LLVM,RISCV,4270,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the context in which the code is being executed. However, based on the syntax and the fact that the `return` statement is used to return a value from a function, it is likely that the next statement after this code snippet would be the end of the function." LLVM,RISCV,4271,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be the initialization of the `TTIImpl` object with the values passed to the constructor. The constructor is defined as `explicit TTIImpl ( const TargetMachine * TM , const Function & F )`, which means that it takes two arguments: a pointer to a `TargetMachine` object and a reference to a `Function` object. The constructor initializes the `TTIImpl` object with the values passed to it, using the `BaseT` constructor to initialize the" LLVM,RISCV,4272,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be the initialization of the `TTIImpl` object with the values passed to the constructor. The constructor is defined as `explicit TTIImpl ( const TargetMachine * TM , const Function & F )`, which means that it takes two arguments: a pointer to a `TargetMachine` object and a reference to a `Function` object. The constructor initializes the `TTIImpl` object with the values passed to it, using the `BaseT` constructor to initialize the" LLVM,RISCV,4273,The next statement after the `default` case is the second `case ` statement. LLVM,ARC,0,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet without knowing the context and the implementation of the `RegisterAsmPrinter` function and the `getTheTarget` function. However, based on the syntax and the names of the functions, it appears that the code is registering an assembly printer for a specific instruction set architecture (ISA) with the `RegisterAsmPrinter` function, and then retrieving the target of the ISA using the `getTheTarget` function. Without more information, it is not possible" LLVM,ARC,1,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet without knowing the context and the implementation of the `RegisterAsmPrinter` function and the `getTheTarget` function. However, based on the syntax and the names of the functions, it appears that the code is registering an assembly printer for a specific instruction set architecture (ISA) with the `RegisterAsmPrinter` function, and then retrieving the target of the ISA using the `getTheTarget` function. Without more information, it is not possible" LLVM,ARC,2,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `MCInstPrinter . printInst ( TmpInst , O ) ;` This statement is part of the `switch` block and is executed when the opcode of the machine instruction `MI` is equal to ``. The statement prints the instruction `TmpInst` to the output stream `O` using the `MCInstPrinter`." LLVM,ARC,3,"The next statement after the code snippet you provided is likely to be the end of the function or method that contains the code snippet. The code snippet you provided is a return statement that is casting the result of a function call to a specific type. The function being called is `getTargetStreamer()`, and it is being called on the object pointed to by `OutStreamer`. The return type of the function is likely to be a reference to a class that implements the `ISA_LIT` interface, and the code is casting the result of the function call to that type. Without more context," LLVM,ARC,4,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `TargetStreamer` and `AsmPrinter` classes. However, based on the names of the classes and the method being called, it is likely that the next statement will be related to printing or streaming assembly code." LLVM,ARC,5,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `MF.ensureAlignment(Align());` This statement ensures that the alignment of the machine function `MF` is set to the specified value ``. The `ensureAlignment` method is called on the `MF` object, passing in the alignment value as an argument." LLVM,ARC,6,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be the initialization of the `MCInstLowering` object, which is a member variable of the `AsmPrinter` class. The `MCInstLowering` object is constructed with a pointer to the `OutContext` object and a reference to the `AsmPrinter` object. Here is the predicted next statement: ``` MCInstLowering(OutContext, *this); ```" LLVM,ARC,7,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be the initialization of the `MCInstLowering` object, which is a member variable of the `AsmPrinter` class. The `MCInstLowering` object is constructed with a pointer to the `OutContext` object and a reference to the `AsmPrinter` object. Here is the predicted next statement: ``` MCInstLowering(OutContext, *this); ```" LLVM,ARC,8,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `MCInstPrinter::emitInstruction(MI, O);` This is because the `emitInstruction` method is being called on an object of type `MCInstPrinter`, and it is passing the `MachineInstr` object `MI` and the `raw_svector_ostream` object `O` as arguments. The method is then using the `MCInstLowering` class to lower the instruction and print it to the output stream." LLVM,ARC,9,The next statement after `return ;` would be the end of the function. LLVM,ARC,10,"return ""MyPass"";" LLVM,ARC,11,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet without knowing the context and the implementation of the `RegisterAsmPrinter` function and the `getTheTarget` function. However, based on the syntax and the names of the functions, it appears that the code is registering an assembly printer for a specific instruction set architecture (ISA) with the `RegisterAsmPrinter` function, and then retrieving the target of the ISA using the `getTheTarget` function. Without more information, it is not possible" LLVM,ARC,12,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `MF.ensureAlignment(Align());` This statement ensures that the alignment of the machine function `MF` is set to the specified value ``. The `ensureAlignment` method is called on the `MachineFunction` object `MF`, passing in the desired alignment value as an argument." LLVM,ARC,13,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific inputs and the behavior of the functions being called. However, based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the next statement will be a call to the `BuildMI` function, passing in various arguments related to the current machine instruction. The `BuildMI` function is likely to modify the machine instruction in some way, such as adding a new operand or modifying an existing one." LLVM,ARC,14,"Based on the code snippet, it appears that the next statement will be: `BuildMI(MI->getParent(), MI, MI->getDebugLoc(), TII->get(getBRccForPseudo(MI))).addMBB(MI->getOperand().getMBB()).addReg(MI->getOperand().getReg()).add(MI->getOperand()).addImm(getCCForBRcc(MI->getOperand(getInstSizeInBytes(MI)`. If the size of the instruction is greater than a certain value (``) or equal to that value, then the code will print a debug message. Otherwise, the code will add the size of the instruction to the `MaxSize` variable." LLVM,ARC,18,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `BranchToPCList.push_back(std::make_pair(&MI, PC));` This statement adds a new element to the `BranchToPCList` vector, which is a pair consisting of the current machine instruction (`MI`) and the current PC value. The `push_back` method is used to add the new element to the end of the vector." LLVM,ARC,19,"The next statement in this code snippet is: `return PassRegistry::getPassRegistry()->getPassBranchFinalizePass();" LLVM,ARC,20,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return new BranchFinalize();` This statement creates a new instance of the `BranchFinalize` class and returns it as a `FunctionPass` object. The `BranchFinalize` class is a subclass of `FunctionPass` that is used to optimize the control flow of a function by finalizing branches. The `` template parameter is used to specify the instruction set architecture (ISA) of the target platform." LLVM,ARC,21,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be a `return` statement, as the previous line is an `if` statement that checks the opcode of the `MachineInstr` object `MI` and returns a value if the condition is true. The `return` statement is likely to return a value that is related to the opcode of the `MachineInstr` object `MI`, as the `if` statement checks the opcode of `MI` and returns a value if the condition is true. Without knowing the specific implementation of the `getBRccForPseudo`" LLVM,ARC,22,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific values of the variables and the logic of the program. However, based on the syntax and structure of the code, it appears that the next statement will be a `return` statement, as the code is currently in a `switch` block and the `case` statements are being evaluated. It is also possible that the next statement could be a `break` statement, as the `switch` block is not currently closed and the `break` statement could be used to exit the block and return control to the calling" LLVM,ARC,23,The next statement after `return ;` would be the end of the function. LLVM,ARC,24,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the program depends on the value of the variable `CC` and the value of the literal ``. However, based on the syntax of the code, it appears that the `if` statement is checking whether `CC` is not equal to the value of the literal ``. If this is the case, then the next statement of the code would be executed if the condition is true, and the code would continue executing the next statement after the `if` statement if the" LLVM,ARC,25,"Based on the code snippet, it appears that the next statement will be: `MI -> eraseFromParent ( ) ;` This is because the `else` clause of the `if` statement is executed when the condition `MI -> getParent ( ) -> isa ( BB )` is not true. In this case, the `MI` instruction is not a basic block, so the `eraseFromParent` method is called on it to remove it from its parent." LLVM,ARC,26,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `BuildMI` and `TII` classes, as well as the values of the variables and parameters used in the code. However, based on the syntax and structure of the code, it appears that the next statement after the first `BuildMI` call is likely to be another `BuildMI` call, possibly with a different set of parameters. The second `BuildMI` call is also likely to be followed by a call to the `addReg` method, and then a call to" LLVM,ARC,27,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `BuildMI` and `MBB` classes, as well as the values of the variables and constants used in the code. However, based on the syntax and structure of the code, it appears that the next statement after the one you provided is likely to be a call to the `addMBB` method of the `BuildMI` class, passing in the result of the `getMBB` method of the `MI` class as an argument. Here is a possible next" LLVM,ARC,28,"The next statement in this code snippet is: Branches.push_back(&MI);" LLVM,ARC,29,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be the continuation of the `for` loop, which would be the next iteration of the loop. In the next iteration, the code would check the size of the next instruction in the `MBB` vector, and if it is greater than or equal to the specified number, it would print a debug message and continue to the next instruction. If the instruction is a branch instruction, it would be added to the `Branches` vector and the `BranchToPCList` vector would be updated with the address of the branch instruction and the current program counter" LLVM,ARC,30,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `DecodeSymbolicOperandOff(Inst, Address, SignExtend32(InsnS), Decoder);` This statement calls the `DecodeSymbolicOperandOff` function with the current instruction `Inst`, the current address `Address`, the symbolic operand `B` extended to 32 bits using `SignExtend32`, and the `Decoder` object. The function returns a value indicating whether the operand was successfully decoded." LLVM,ARC,31,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific values of the constants and variables used in the code. However, based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the next statement will be the return statement, which will return the value of the `MCDisassembler::Success` constant. The code snippet is part of a function that appears to be a disassembler for a specific instruction set architecture. The function takes an instruction operand and adds it to a list of operands for the instruction. The `max` variable is initialized to a" LLVM,ARC,32,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet without knowing the context and the purpose of the code. However, based on the syntax and the use of the `addOperand` method, it appears that the code is adding an immediate operand to an instruction. The immediate operand is created using the `MCOperand::createImm` method, which takes an integer value as an argument. The integer value is determined by the expression `InsnS < max ? static_cast < int > ( InsnS ) : - `. This expression uses the t" LLVM,ARC,33,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return DecodeGPR32RegisterClass ( Inst , RegNo , Address , Decoder ) ;` This statement is executed if the condition `RegNo > ` is true, which means that the register number is greater than the number of literal registers. In this case, the function `DecodeGPR32RegisterClass` is called to decode the register class, and the result is returned." LLVM,ARC,34,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `Inst.addOperand(MCOperand::createReg(Reg));` This statement adds an operand to the instruction, which is a register operand. The register operand is created using the `MCOperand::createReg` function, which takes a register number as an argument. In this case, the register number is obtained from the `RegNo` variable, which is a member of the `Inst` object." LLVM,ARC,35,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `LLVM_DEBUG(dbgs() << );` This statement is a debug print statement that uses the `dbgs()` function to print the string literal `` to the debug output stream. The `LLVM_DEBUG` macro is used to conditionally compile this statement based on the `LLVM_DEBUG` flag. If the flag is set to `true`, the statement will be executed and the string will be printed to the debug output stream. If the flag is set to `false`, the statement will" LLVM,ARC,36,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be: `Inst.addOperand(MCOperand::createReg(DstA));` This is because the previous statement `DecodeGPR32RegisterClass(Inst, DstA, Address, Decoder);` is likely to have set the value of `DstA` to a register, and the next statement is likely to be adding an operand to the instruction using that register." LLVM,ARC,37,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific values of the variables and the behavior of the functions being called. However, based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the next statement will be: `DecodeGPR32RegisterClass(Inst, DstA, Address, Decoder);` This is because the previous statement, `SrcB = decodeBField(Insn);`, is likely to have updated the value of `SrcB`, and the next statement is likely to be a call to `DecodeG" LLVM,ARC,38,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific values of the variables and the implementation of the `DecodeGPR32RegisterClass` function. However, based on the information provided, it appears that the code is extracting bits from the `Insn` variable and using them to construct a register number and an address. The `DecodeGPR32RegisterClass` function is then being called with these values to perform some operation on the register. Without more information about the specific implementation of the code, it is not possible to provide a" LLVM,ARC,39,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be: `Inst.addOperand(MCOperand::createReg(R));` This is because the previous statement, `DecodeGPR32RegisterClass(Inst, R, Address, Dec)`, is a function call that adds an operand to the `Inst` object, and the next statement is likely to be another function call that adds another operand to the `Inst` object. The `MCOperand::createReg` function creates a new operand that represents a register, and the `R` variable is likely" LLVM,ARC,40,"The next statement of this code snippet is: Inst . addOperand ( MCOperand :: createReg ( RegNum ) ) ;" LLVM,ARC,41,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `Inst.addOperand(MCOperand::createReg(RegNum));` This is because the `DecodeRegisterOrImm` function is called with the `RegNum` field as an argument, and the function checks if the value of `RegNum` is equal to a specific value (represented by ``). If it is, then the function creates a new `MCOperand` object using the `createReg` method and adds it to the `Inst` object using the `addOperand" LLVM,ARC,42,"The next statement after the `static_assert` statement in the code snippet is: `static_assert ( B > , ) ;` This statement is a compile-time assertion that checks whether the value of `B` is greater than the value of ``. If the assertion fails, the compiler will generate an error message containing the string literal ``." LLVM,ARC,43,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the code depends on the specific values of the variables and the implementation of the functions being called. However, based on the names of the variables and the functions being called, it appears that the code is decoding instructions for a processor and extracting the immediate value from the instruction. The `decodeCField` function is likely decoding the condition field of the instruction, which is used to determine the condition under which the instruction is executed. The `DecodeGPR32RegisterClass` function is likely decoding" LLVM,ARC,44,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return (nullptr != Disassembler && Disassembler->tryAddingSymbolicOperand(Inst, Value, Address, true, , atLeast));` This statement is a return statement that returns the result of the logical AND operation between `nullptr` and `Disassembler->tryAddingSymbolicOperand(Inst, Value, Address, true, , atLeast)`. The `tryAddingSymbolicOperand` method is called on the `Disass" LLVM,ARC,45,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be the return value of the `tryAddingSymbolicOperand` function, which is called on the `Disassembler` object. The `tryAddingSymbolicOperand` function takes several arguments, including the `Inst` object, the `Value` object, the `Address` object, and a boolean value indicating whether the operand should be added symbolically. The function also takes a numeric literal (``) and a boolean value indicating whether the operand should be added at least once. The return value" LLVM,ARC,46,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the program depends on the input data and the specific implementation of the `DecodeSymbolicOperandOff` function. However, based on the name of the function and the parameters it takes, it is likely that the function is responsible for decoding a symbolic operand at a specific offset in an instruction. The function may use the `Decoder` parameter to access the decoding information and the `Address` and `Offset` parameters to determine the location of the symbolic operand in the instruction. The `Inst" LLVM,ARC,47,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the program depends on the input data and the specific implementation of the `DecodeSymbolicOperandOff` function. However, based on the name of the function and the parameters it takes, it is likely that the function is responsible for decoding a symbolic operand at a specific offset in an instruction. The function may use the `Decoder` parameter to access the decoding information and the `Address` and `Offset` parameters to determine the location of the symbolic operand in the instruction. The `Inst" LLVM,ARC,48,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `if (Success == Result) { LLVM_DEBUG(dbgs() << ); return Result; }` This is because the `if` statement that precedes it checks whether `Success` is equal to `Result`, and if it is, it executes the code inside the `if` block." LLVM,ARC,49,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `LLVM_DEBUG(dbgs() << ""Decoding instruction at address "" << Address << "" with size "" << Size << "" and opcode "" << Instr.getOpcode() << ""\n"");` This statement is a debug print statement that prints the address, size, and opcode of the instruction being decoded. It uses the `LLVM_DEBUG` macro to only print the message when the `LLVM_DEBUG` flag is set." LLVM,ARC,50,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `LLVMInitializeDisassembler();` This statement is a function call to the `LLVMInitialize` function, which is a part of the LLVM library. The function is used to initialize the disassembler for the specified instruction set architecture (ISA). The `` placeholder is used to indicate that the function is a template function, and the `Disassembler` parameter is used to specify the type of disassembler to initialize." LLVM,ARC,51,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be: `Inst.addOperand(MCOperand::createReg(DstB));` This is because the previous statement `DstB = decodeBField(Insn);` suggests that `DstB` is a register, and the next statement `Inst.addOperand(MCOperand::createImm(U6Field));` adds an immediate operand to the instruction, which is not consistent with the type of `DstB`. Therefore, it is likely that the next statement will be adding a register oper" LLVM,ARC,52,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `Inst.addOperand(MCOperand::createImm(U6Field));` This statement adds an immediate operand to the instruction `Inst`, with the value of the `U6Field` field." LLVM,ARC,53,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return Decoder.decodeRegister(Inst, Address, Value);`" LLVM,ARC,54,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be: `Inst.addOperand(MCOperand::createImm(Result));` This statement adds an immediate operand to the instruction, with the value of the operand being the result of the previous calculations. The `MCOperand::createImm` function is used to create an immediate operand, and the `Result` variable is passed as the argument to the function." LLVM,ARC,55,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the program depends on the specific values of the variables and the implementation of the `fieldFromInstruction` function. However, based on the information provided, it is likely that the next statement after the one you provided will be an assignment to a variable, such as: ``` Field U7 = fieldFromInstruction ( Insn , , ) ; ``` This is because the `fieldFromInstruction` function is likely to return a `" LLVM,ARC,56,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the disassembler and the instruction being disassembled. However, based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the next statement would be to add the operand to the instruction. The `addOperand` method is called on the `Inst` object, which is an instance of the `MCInst` class. This method adds an operand to the instruction, which is represented by the `MCOperand` object. The `MCOperand` object is created" LLVM,ARC,57,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be the `return` statement, which returns the result of the expression `( nullptr != Disassembler && Disassembler -> tryAddingSymbolicOperand ( Inst , Value , Address , true , , AtLeast ) )`. The expression `( nullptr != Disassembler && Disassembler -> tryAddingSymbolicOperand ( Inst , Value , Address , true , , AtLeast ) )` is a logical AND operation that checks if `Disassembler" LLVM,ARC,58,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the program depends on the input data and the specific implementation of the `DecodeSymbolicOperandOff` function. However, based on the name of the function and the parameters it takes, it is likely that the function is responsible for decoding a symbolic operand at a specific offset in an instruction. The function may use the `Decoder` parameter to access the decoding information and the `Address` and `Offset` parameters to determine the location of the symbolic operand in the instruction. The `Inst" LLVM,ARC,59,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `static const uint64_t AtLeast = ;` This statement declares a constant variable `AtLeast` of type `uint64_t` and initializes it with the value ``. The `static` keyword indicates that the variable has internal linkage, meaning it can only be accessed within the current translation unit (i.e., the current source file)." LLVM,ARC,60,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `decodeBField` and `DecodeGPR32RegisterClass` functions, as well as the value of the `Insn` variable. However, based on the context of the code snippet, it is likely that the next statement will be a call to the `DecodeGPR32RegisterClass` function, passing in the `Inst`, `DstB`, `Address`, and `Decoder` variables as arguments. This function is likely to be responsible for decoding" LLVM,ARC,61,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet without knowing the context and the purpose of the code. However, based on the syntax and the functions used, it appears that the code is disassembling a machine code instruction and adding an operand to the instruction. The `addOperand` function is called with a `MCOperand` object that is created using the `createImm` function, which creates an immediate operand with the specified value. The value of the immediate operand is obtained by sign-extending the 32-bit value of `S` to" LLVM,ARC,62,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet without knowing the context and the implementation of the `MCDisassembler` class. However, based on the name of the method and the parameters it takes, it appears to be a method that decodes a branch target instruction in a disassembler. The method takes four parameters: * `Inst`: a reference to the instruction to be decoded * `S`: an integer representing the size of the instruction * `Address`: a 64-bit integer representing the address of the instruction * `Decoder`: a pointer" LLVM,ARC,63,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `MCDisassembler` class and the input data. However, based on the name of the method and the parameters it takes, it appears to be a method that decodes a branch target instruction in the S25 instruction set. The method takes four parameters: * `Inst`: a reference to the `MCInst` object that represents the instruction being decoded. * `S`: an unsigned integer that represents the size of the instruction. * `Address`:" LLVM,ARC,64,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet without knowing the context and the purpose of the code. However, based on the syntax and the functions used, it appears that the code is disassembling a machine code instruction and adding an operand to the instruction. The `addOperand` function is called with a `MCOperand` object that is created using the `createImm` function, which creates an immediate operand with the specified value. The value of the immediate operand is obtained by sign-extending the 32-bit value of `S` to" LLVM,ARC,65,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `MCDisassembler` class and the `GPR32DecoderTable` array. However, based on the code snippet you provided, it appears that the next statement will be: `Inst.addOperand(MCOperand::createReg(Reg));` This statement adds an operand to the instruction being disassembled, where the operand is a register specified by the `Reg` variable. The `Reg` variable is assigned a value from" LLVM,ARC,66,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return MCDisassembler :: Fail;` Explanation: The code snippet is a part of a function named `DecodeLdLImmInstruction`, which is a member function of the `MCDisassembler` class. The function takes four parameters: `Inst`, `Insn`, `Address`, and `Decoder`. The function first extracts the `SrcB` field from the `Insn` parameter using the `decodeBField` function. If the `SrcB` field is not" LLVM,ARC,67,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet without knowing the specific values of the variables and constants used in the code. However, based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the next statement will be a call to the `DecodeGPR32RegisterClass` function, which is likely to be a function that decodes a 32-bit register class. The function is called with the `Inst` object, the `R` register, the `Address` object, and the `Dec` object as arguments. The `Inst` object is likely to be an object that represents an" LLVM,ARC,68,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet without knowing the context and the specific values of the variables and constants used in the code. However, based on the syntax and the names of the functions and variables, it appears that this code is related to instruction decoding and operand processing in a computer processor. The `Inst` object is being used to add an operand to an instruction, and the `addOperand` function is being called with an argument that is created using the `MCOperand::createImm` function. The `createImm` function creates an immediate operand" LLVM,ARC,69,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet without knowing the context and the specific values of the variables and constants used in the code. However, based on the syntax and the names of the functions and variables, it appears that this code is related to instruction decoding and operand processing in a computer processor. The `Inst` object is being used to add an operand to an instruction, and the `addOperand` function is being called with an argument that is created using the `MCOperand::createImm` function. The `createImm` function creates an immediate operand" LLVM,ARC,70,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet without knowing the context and the values of the variables and constants used in the code. However, based on the syntax and the names of the functions and variables, it appears that the code is related to disassembling instructions in a computer program. The `Inst` object appears to be an instance of a class that represents an instruction in a computer program. The `addOperand` method is called on the `Inst` object, which adds an operand to the instruction. The operand is created using the `MCOperand::createImm" LLVM,ARC,71,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return MCDisassembler::Success;` This is because the `DecodeS9Operand` function is expected to return a value of type `MCDisassembler::DecodeStatus`, which is an enumeration that indicates the status of the decoding operation. The `Success` value indicates that the decoding was successful, and the function is returning this value to indicate that the operand was successfully decoded and added to the `Inst` object." LLVM,ARC,72,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific values of the variables and the behavior of the `decodeCField` function. However, based on the code snippet, it appears that the next statement will be: `SrcC = decodeCField(Insn);` This is because the `if` statement checks whether `DstB` is equal to a specific value, and if it is not, it returns `MCDisassembler::Fail`. If the `if` statement is not executed, then the code will continue to" LLVM,ARC,73,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be: `Inst.addOperand(MCOperand::createImm(LImm));` This is because the previous statement, `LImm = (Insn >> );`, sets the value of `LImm` to the result of shifting the `Insn` value right by `` bits. The next statement then adds an immediate operand to the `Inst` object using the `MCOperand::createImm()` function, passing in the value of `" LLVM,ARC,74,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be: `Insn64 = (Bytes[] & ) >> ;` This statement is assigning the value of `Insn64` to the result of a bitwise AND operation between the `Bytes` array and a constant value, followed by a right shift operation. The value of `Insn64` is then used in the subsequent statements of the code snippet." LLVM,ARC,75,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `if (Result == MCDisassembler::Success) {`" LLVM,ARC,76,"The next statement of this code snippet is: Inst.addOperand(MCOperand::createReg(DstA));" LLVM,ARC,77,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `DecodeGPR32RegisterClass(Inst, SrcB, Address, Decoder);` This statement is calling the `DecodeGPR32RegisterClass` function, which is used to decode the general-purpose registers (GPRs) in the instruction. The function takes four arguments: `Inst`, which is the instruction being decoded; `SrcB`, which is the source register for the instruction; `Address`, which is the address of the instruction; and `Decoder`, which is the decoder object being used to" LLVM,ARC,78,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `Field::DecodeMoveHRegInstruction(Inst, Insn, Address, Decoder);` This is a call to the `DecodeMoveHRegInstruction` function, which is a member function of the `Field` class. The function takes four arguments: `Inst`, `Insn`, `Address`, and `Decoder`. The `Inst` argument is a reference to a `MCInst` object, which is a member of the `Field` class. The `Insn` argument is a `uint64_t` value" LLVM,ARC,79,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of the code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `MCDisassembler` class and the values of the variables `Insn`, `SrcC`, `Address`, and `Decoder`. However, based on the information provided, it appears that the code is attempting to decode a machine instruction and extract the literal value from the instruction. The first line of the code snippet returns a failure value from the `MCDisassembler` class, which suggests that the instruction could not be decoded. The second line uses the `decode" LLVM,ARC,80,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `if ( Bytes . size ( ) >= ) { uint64_t Insn48 ; if ( ! readInstruction48 ( Bytes , Address , Size , Insn48 ) ) return Fail ; Result = decodeInstruction ( DecoderTable48 , Instr , Insn48 , Address , this , STI ) ; if ( Success == Result ) { DEBUG ( dbgs ( ) << ) ; return Result ; } DEBUG ( dbgs ( ) << Disassembler ( STI , Ctx , T . createMCInstrInfo ( ) ) ;` This statement creates a new instance of the `MCDisassembler` class, passing in the `STI` and `Ctx` objects as arguments. The `T . createMCInstrInfo ( )` method is called to create a new instance of the `MCInstrInfo` class, which is then passed as an argument to the `MCDisassembler` constructor." LLVM,ARC,84,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be a call to the `fieldFromInstruction` function, passing in the `Insn` variable and two literal values as arguments. The function will then extract the specified field from the instruction and return its value." LLVM,ARC,85,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the `decodeAField` function is not specified. However, based on the name of the function and the fact that it takes an `unsigned` parameter, it is likely that the function is intended to decode a field within an instruction. Without more information about the specific instruction set architecture and the implementation of the `decodeAField` function, it is not possible to provide a more specific prediction of the next statement." LLVM,ARC,86,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the `decodeBField` function depends on the specific implementation and the value of the `Insn` parameter. However, based on the name of the function and the type of the `Insn` parameter, it is likely that this function is intended to extract and return a specific field (e.g. the ""B"" field) from the instruction word represented by `Insn`. Therefore, a possible next statement of this code snippet could be: ``` return Insn & 0" LLVM,ARC,87,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet without knowing the specific implementation of the `DecodeSymbolicOperandOff` function and the `Inst`, `Address`, `SignExtend32`, and `Decoder` variables. However, based on the naming conventions used in the code, it is likely that the `DecodeSymbolicOperandOff` function is used to decode a symbolic operand at the specified address, and the `SignExtend32` function is used to extend the sign of the operand to 32 bits. The `Decoder` variable is likely" LLVM,ARC,88,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be: `Inst.addOperand(MCOperand::createReg(DstB));` This is because the previous statement added two immediate operands to the instruction, and now the code is adding a register operand to the instruction. The `DstB` variable is likely to be a register, and the `Inst.addOperand()` method is being called with a `MCOperand::createReg()` argument, which creates a register operand." LLVM,ARC,89,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `Inst.addOperand(MCOperand::createImm(InsnS < max ? static_cast(InsnS) : -));` This statement adds an immediate operand to the instruction, using the `MCOperand::createImm()` method. The operand value is determined by the expression `InsnS < max ? static_cast(InsnS) : -`. If `InsnS` is less than `max`," LLVM,ARC,90,"The next statement of this code snippet is: const unsigned max = ( << B ) - ; Explanation: The code snippet defines a constant variable `max` of type `unsigned` and initializes it with the result of the expression `( << B ) - `. The expression `( << B )` shifts the value of `NUM_LIT` to the left by `B` bits, which is equivalent to multiplying it by" LLVM,ARC,91,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty because the behavior of the code is dependent on the input values and the specific implementation of the `DecodeGBR32ShortRegister` function. However, based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the function is attempting to decode a register number and adjust it if necessary. The `if` statement checks if the register number is greater than a certain value (represented by ``). If it is, the register number is adjusted by adding `` to it. The adjusted" LLVM,ARC,92,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the code depends on the input values and the specific implementation of the `DecodeGBR32ShortRegister` function. However, based on the name of the function and the parameters it takes, it is likely that the function is responsible for decoding a 32-bit short register value from a memory address. The function may use the `MCInst` and `RegNo` parameters to determine the specific register being decoded, and the `Address` parameter to determine the memory address where the register value" LLVM,ARC,93,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `LLVM_DEBUG(dbgs() << ""Register number is out of range"");` This statement is executed when the register number (`RegNo`) is greater than or equal to ``, which is a constant value defined in the code. If this condition is true, the code logs a debug message using the `LLVM_DEBUG` macro, and then returns `MCDisassembler::Fail`, which is a constant value defined in the code." LLVM,ARC,94,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `MCDisassembler` class and the values of the variables involved. However, based on the code snippet provided, it is likely that the next statement will be a call to the `Fail` method of the `MCDisassembler` class, as the code appears to be handling an error condition." LLVM,ARC,95,"The next statement of this code snippet is: Inst.addOperand(MCOperand::createImm((uint32_t)(Insn >> ))); This statement adds an immediate operand to the instruction, with the value obtained by shifting the instruction word to the right by bits. The value of the immediate operand is cast to a 32-bit unsigned integer before being added to the instruction." LLVM,ARC,96,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific values of the variables and the implementation of the `DecodeGPR32RegisterClass` function. However, based on the information provided, it is likely that the next statement will be a call to the `DecodeGPR32RegisterClass` function, passing in the values of `Inst`, `R`, `Address`, and `Dec` as arguments." LLVM,ARC,97,"The next statement of the code snippet is: `Inst.addOperand(MCOperand::createImm(Value));` This statement adds an immediate operand to the instruction being decoded, with the value specified by the `Value` field. The `MCOperand::createImm` function is used to create an immediate operand with the given value. The `Inst.addOperand` method is then used to add the operand to the instruction." LLVM,ARC,98,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be: `Inst.addOperand(MCOperand::createImm(SignExtend32(maskTrailingOnes(B) & InsnS)));` This is because the `static_assert` statement is used to check that the value of `B` is greater than a certain value (represented by `` in the code snippet), and if it is not, the program will terminate with an error message (represented by `tryAddingSymbolicOperand(Inst, Value, Address, true, , AtLeast));` This statement is a return statement that returns the result of the `tryAddingSymbolicOperand` method of the `Decoder` object. The method takes several arguments, including the `Inst` object, the `Value` and `Address` of the symbolic operand, and a boolean value indicating whether the operand is symbolic. The method returns a" LLVM,ARC,104,"The next statement of this code snippet is: uint64_t NextAddress = Address + Offset;" LLVM,ARC,105,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `Inst.addOperand(MCOperand::createImm(Offset));` This statement adds an immediate operand to the instruction `Inst` with the value of `Offset`. The `MCOperand::createImm` function creates an immediate operand with the specified value. The `Inst.addOperand` function adds the operand to the instruction." LLVM,ARC,106,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `if ( !readInstruction32(Bytes, Address, Size, Insn32) ) { return Fail; }` This statement checks if the `readInstruction32` function was successful in reading a 32-bit instruction from the `Bytes` buffer. If the function was not successful, the `Fail` value is returned." LLVM,ARC,107,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `TargetRegistry` class and the `RegisterMCDisassembler` method. However, based on the syntax and the fact that the method is called `RegisterMCDisassembler`, it is likely that the next statement will involve registering a disassembler for the `ISA_LIT` target. Here are a few possibilities: 1. The next statement could be a call to the `RegisterMCDisassembler` method again, with a different target" LLVM,ARC,108,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the value of `` is not known. However, based on the context of the code, it appears that `` is a constant value that represents the number of bytes in a 32-bit instruction. Therefore, the next statement of this code snippet is likely to be `Size = 4;`, which assigns the value 4 to the variable `Size`. This is because the code is reading a 32-bit instruction, which is typically represented by 4" LLVM,ARC,109,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the value of `Size` is not specified. However, based on the syntax, it appears that `Size` is being assigned a value of ``." LLVM,ARC,110,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `Size = 48;` Explanation: The `readInstruction48` function is reading 48 bits from an array of bytes, and storing the result in the `Insn` variable. The `Size` variable is being set to 48 to indicate the number of bits that were read." LLVM,ARC,111,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `BuildMI` function and the values of the variables `Ra`, `Src`, and `MI`. However, based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the next statement will be a call to the `add` method of the `BuildMI` object, passing in the value of `Src` as an argument." LLVM,ARC,112,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `BuildMI` class and the values of the variables used in the code. However, based on the syntax and the methods called, it appears that the next statement will be an invocation of the `add` method on the `BuildMI` object, passing in a destination register and an immediate value. The immediate value is likely to be a string literal, as the `addImm` method is called with a string literal as its argument. The destination register is likely to be a register that holds" LLVM,ARC,113,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `MachineFunction` and `MachineBasicBlock` classes, as well as the input data. However, based on the names of the classes and methods used in the code, it appears that this code is related to the expansion of machine instructions in a compiler. The `MachineFunction` class appears to represent a function in the machine code, and the `MachineBasicBlock` class represents a basic block of instructions in the machine code. The `expandCTTZ` method is likely expanding the" LLVM,ARC,114,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific inputs and the behavior of the functions being called. However, based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the next statement will be a call to the `BuildMI` function with the `AddrReg` parameter. The `BuildMI` function is called twice in the code snippet, and each time it is called with a different set of arguments. The first call to `BuildMI` is made with the `AddOpc` parameter, which is a register that is set to either the `Add" LLVM,ARC,115,"It's difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific values of the variables and the behavior of the functions being called. However, based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the next statement will be a call to the `BuildMI` function with the `AddrReg` register as an argument. The `BuildMI` function is likely to be a function that builds a machine instruction, and the `AddrReg` register is likely to be a register that contains the address of the instruction to be built. The next statement will likely be a call to the" LLVM,ARC,116,"Based on the code snippet provided, it is difficult to predict the next statement with certainty. However, based on the context and the control flow of the code, it is likely that the next statement will be: `MBBI = NMBBI;` This is because the `while` loop is iterating over the `MachineBasicBlock` using the `MBBI` iterator, and the `NMBBI` iterator is being used to iterate over the next basic block. The `switch` statement is checking the opcode of the current instruction, and if it matches one of the cases, it will call" LLVM,ARC,117,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `ExpandPseudos` function and the input data. However, based on the name of the function and the fact that it is a machine function pass, it is likely that the next statement will be related to the expansion of pseudo-instructions in the input data. Some possible next statements could include: * A loop that iterates over the input data and expands any pseudo-instructions that are encountered. * A call to a separate function that performs the" LLVM,ARC,118,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `ExpandPseudos` function and the input data. However, based on the name of the function and the fact that it is a machine function pass, it is likely that the next statement will be related to the expansion of pseudo-instructions in the input data. Some possible next statements could include: * A loop that iterates over the input data and expands any pseudo-instructions that are encountered. * A call to a separate function that performs the" LLVM,ARC,119,"This code snippet appears to be part of a function that is generating machine code for a specific architecture. The function is using a table-driven approach, where the function `getMappedOp` is used to map the opcode of the instruction being processed to a specific machine code operation. The first part of the code snippet is creating a virtual register `AddrReg` and an immediate value `AddOpc` based on the operands of the instruction being processed. The `BuildMI` function is then called to generate the machine code for the instruction, using the `AddrReg` and `AddO" LLVM,ARC,120,"This code snippet appears to be part of a function that is building a machine instruction (MI) object. The function is taking a series of operands and adding them to the MI object using the `addReg` and `addImm` methods. The `getMappedOp` method is used to retrieve the mapped opcode for the instruction. The next statement in the code snippet is `SI.eraseFromParent();`, which is likely to be a method call on the `SI` object to erase it from its parent. This could be done to free up memory or to remove the instruction from" LLVM,ARC,121,"The next statement in this code snippet is `default : llvm_unreachable ( ) ;`. The `switch` statement is checking the value of an expression, and the `case` statements are checking for specific values. If the value of the expression matches any of the `case` statements, the corresponding code block is executed. If the value of the expression does not match any of the `case` statements, the `default` code block is executed. In this case, the `default` code block is calling the `llvm_unreachable`" LLVM,ARC,122,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the value of the `PseudoOp` variable. However, based on the code snippet you provided, it appears that the `PseudoOp` variable is being used to determine which case to execute in the switch statement. Therefore, the next statement that will be executed will depend on the value of `PseudoOp`. If `PseudoOp` is equal to ``, then the first case will be executed and the statement `return " LLVM,ARC,123,The next statement after `return ;` would be the end of the function. LLVM,ARC,124,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be a return statement, as the `getPassName()` function is expected to return a string value. The `` placeholder is a hint that the function should return a string literal, but the actual value returned will depend on the specific implementation of the function." LLVM,ARC,125,"Based on the code snippet you provided, it is difficult to predict the next statement with certainty. However, based on the context and the control flow of the code, it is likely that the next statement will be another case statement or a default statement. The code snippet you provided is part of a loop that iterates over the basic blocks of a machine code program. The loop variable `MBBI` is an iterator that points to the current basic block, and the variable `NMBBI` is an iterator that points to the next basic block. The loop is checking the opcode of the current basic block and performing" LLVM,ARC,126,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `TargetFrameLowering` class and the `determineCalleeSaves` method. However, based on the code snippet you provided, it appears that the `determineCalleeSaves` method is being called on an instance of the `TargetFrameLowering` class, and it is passing in three arguments: `MF`, `SavedRegs`, and `RS`. The `determineCalleeSaves` method is then setting the" LLVM,ARC,127,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `if (Amt != ) {`" LLVM,ARC,128,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific inputs and the behavior of the `BuildMI` function. However, based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the next statement will be a call to `BuildMI` with the same arguments as the previous call, except that the `RegState` argument will be `RegState::Define` instead of `RegState::Implicit | RegState::Kill`. The `BuildMI` function appears to be building a machine instruction, and the `RegState` argument is used to specify the" LLVM,ARC,129,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `BuildMI(MBB, MBBI, MBB.findDebugLoc(MBBI), TII->get("""")) .addExternalSymbol(load_funclet_name[Last - ]) .addReg(, RegState::Implicit | RegState::Kill);` This statement is adding an external symbol to the machine instruction being built, specifically the `load_funclet_name` symbol. The symbol is being added with the `Implicit` and `K" LLVM,ARC,130,"The next statement of this code snippet is: CFIIndex = MF.addFrameInst(MCCFIInstruction::createOffset(nullptr, MRI->getDwarfRegNum(Reg, true), MFI.getObjectOffset(FI)));" LLVM,ARC,131,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `RegInfo->eliminateFrameIndex(MF, RS, MF.getFrameInfo());`" LLVM,ARC,132,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be: `return false;` The `restoreCalleeSavedRegisters` function is declared to return a `bool` value, and the code snippet shown above does not contain any return statement. Therefore, the default return value of `false` is likely to be returned." LLVM,ARC,133,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `for (unsigned i = 0; i < Last; i++) {` This is because the `determineLastCalleeSave` function returns the index of the last callee-saved register that needs to be spilled, and the `for` loop is used to iterate over all the callee-saved registers and spill them." LLVM,ARC,134,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `for (auto Reg : CSI) {` This line is a for-each loop that iterates over the elements of the `CSI` container. The loop variable `Reg` is an iterator that points to each element in the container. The loop will execute the code inside the curly braces for each element in the container." LLVM,ARC,135,"The next statement after the `assert` statement is the `if` statement. The `assert` statement is used to check if the condition `Reg.getReg() >= && Reg.getReg() <= && ` is true, and if it is not, the program will abort with an error message. The `if` statement checks if `Reg.getReg()` is greater than `Last`, and if it is, it assigns the value of `Reg.getReg()` to `Last`." LLVM,ARC,136,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `BuildMI(MBB, MBBI, MBB.findDebugLoc(MBBI), TII->get(), ).addExternalSymbol(load_funclet_name[Last - ]).addReg(, RegState::Implicit | RegState::Kill);` This statement is building a machine instruction using the `BuildMI` function, which is part of the LLVM API. The instruction being built is a load instruction that loads" LLVM,ARC,137,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `LLVM_DEBUG(dbgs() << ""Creating stack frame for function "" << MF.getName() << "":\n"");` This statement is creating a debug message that includes the name of the function being processed, which is stored in the `MF` variable. The message is being output using the `dbgs()` function, which is a debugging stream provided by the LLVM framework. The message includes the string ""Creating stack frame for function "", followed by the name of the function, and then the string "":\n""." LLVM,ARC,138,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `Opc = IsAdd ? : ;` This statement assigns the value of `Opc` to either `` or `` depending on the value of `IsAdd`. If `IsAdd` is true, `Opc` is assigned the value of ``, otherwise it is assigned the value of ``." LLVM,ARC,139,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be: `BuildMI(MBB, MBBI, dl, TII.get(AdjOp), StackPtr).addReg(StackPtr).addImm(AbsAmount);` This statement is building a machine instruction using the `BuildMI` function, which takes several parameters: * `MBB`: The machine basic block that the instruction belongs to. * `MBBI`: The machine basic block instruction that the instruction belongs to. * `dl`: The data layout of the instruction. * `TII`:" LLVM,ARC,140,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be: `AdjOp = Positive ? TII.getAdjustSpUpOpcode() : TII.getAdjustSpDownOpcode();` This is because the code is checking the value of `Positive` and using it to determine which adjustment opcode to use. If `Positive` is true, the adjustment opcode for increasing the stack pointer is used, otherwise the adjustment opcode for decreasing the stack pointer is used." LLVM,ARC,141,"The next statement after the `if` block is: `return false;` The `if` block checks if `UseSaveRestoreFunclet` is true and `Last` is greater than a certain value (which is not specified in the code snippet). If both conditions are true, the function returns `true`. Otherwise, it returns `false`." LLVM,ARC,142,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `BuildMI(MBB, MBBI, dl, TII->get(TargetOpcode::CFI_INSTRUCTION)) .addCFIIndex(CFIIndex) .setMIFlags(MachineInstr::FrameSetup);` This statement is adding a new frame instruction to the machine function `MF` using the `MCCFIInstruction` class. The `CFIIndex` variable is being used to keep track of the index of the current frame instruction. The `TargetOpcode::CFI_INSTR" LLVM,ARC,143,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be the assignment of the `RegScavFI` variable: ``` RegScavFI = MFI.CreateStackObject(RegInfo->getSpillSize(*RC), RegInfo->getSpillAlign(*RC), false); ``` This statement creates a new stack object using the `CreateStackObject` method of the `MFI` object, passing in the spill size and alignment of the register class `RC` as arguments. The `false` argument indicates that the stack object should not be initialized. The resulting stack object is then assigned" LLVM,ARC,144,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `const TargetRegisterClass * RC = & ;` This statement declares a constant pointer to a `TargetRegisterClass` object, and initializes it to the address of a string literal. The string literal is not specified in the code snippet you provided, so it is not possible to determine what it is." LLVM,ARC,145,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `LLVM_DEBUG ( dbgs ( ) << << MBB . getParent ( ) -> getName ( ) << ) ;` This statement is a debug print statement that prints the name of the parent function of the current basic block (MBB) and the name of the current basic block. The `` placeholders are used to represent string literals that are not specified in the code snippet." LLVM,ARC,146,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `TargetFrameLowering::StackGrowsDown`" LLVM,ARC,147,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `TargetFrameLowering::StackGrowsDown`" LLVM,ARC,148,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `for (auto &I : CSI) {` This line is a `for` loop that iterates over the elements of the `CSI` container. The loop variable `I` is a reference to each element in the container, and the loop body will be executed for each element in the container." LLVM,ARC,149,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `TargetFrameLowering` class and the `determineCalleeSaves` method. However, based on the code snippet you provided, it appears that the `determineCalleeSaves` method is being called on an instance of the `TargetFrameLowering` class, and it is passing in three arguments: `MF`, `SavedRegs`, and `RS`. The `determineCalleeSaves` method is then setting the" LLVM,ARC,150,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return MBB.erase(I);` This statement is executed if the `if` condition is not met, meaning that the `Amt` variable is not equal to ``. The `erase` method is called on the `MBB` object with the `I` variable as an argument, which removes the element at index `I` from the `MBB` object. The method then returns the `MBB` object, which is the result of the `erase` method." LLVM,ARC,151,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `BuildMI(MBB, MBBI, MBB.findDebugLoc(MBBI), TII->get("""")) .addReg("""") .addReg("""") .addImm(StackSize - AmountAboveFunclet);` This statement is adding a new instruction to the basic block `MBB` at the location `MBBI`, using the `BuildMI` function. The instruction is a memory access instruction, specifically a load instruction, and it is loading a" LLVM,ARC,152,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `BuildMI(MBB, MBBI, MBB.findDebugLoc(MBBI), TII->get("""")).addReg("""").addReg("""").addImm(StackSize - AmountAboveFunclet);` This statement is a call to the `BuildMI` function, which is used to build a machine instruction. The function takes several arguments, including a reference to the basic block (`MBB`), the basic block index (`MBBI`), a debug location" LLVM,ARC,153,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `AdjOp = Positive ? : ;` This is a ternary operator that assigns the value of `` to `AdjOp` if `Positive` is true, and the value of `` if `Positive` is false." LLVM,ARC,154,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be: `AdjOp = TII.getAdjustmentOpcode(Amount, Positive);` This is because the code is checking if the `Amount` is less than a certain value (represented by ``), and if it is, it sets `Positive` to `false` and sets `AbsAmount` to the negative of `Amount`. If `Amount` is greater than or equal to ``, it sets `Positive` to `true` and sets `Abs" LLVM,ARC,155,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `DEBUG ( dbgs ( ) << << RegScavFI << ) ;` This statement is a debug print statement that prints the value of `RegScavFI` to the debug output stream. The `` placeholders are replaced with string literals that provide context for the value being printed." LLVM,ARC,156,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `if (MFI.hasStackObjects()) {` This is because the code snippet ends with a call to `MFI.getStackSize()`, which is the last statement in the `DEBUG` block. The next statement in the code snippet is the `if` statement that checks if `MFI` has stack objects." LLVM,ARC,157,"The next statement after the `if` block is: `return true;` This is because the `if` block is only executed if `UseSaveRestoreFunclet` is `true` and `Last` is greater than ``. If these conditions are met, the function returns `true`." LLVM,ARC,158,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `unsigned Last = determineLastCalleeSave(CSI);` This line of code determines the last callee-saved register that needs to be saved by the function. The `determineLastCalleeSave` function takes a vector of `CalleeSavedInfo` objects as an argument, which contains information about the callee-saved registers that need to be saved. The function returns the index of the last callee-saved register that needs to be saved. The `Last` variable is then used in the next line" LLVM,ARC,159,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet without knowing the context and the purpose of the code. However, based on the code provided, it appears that the code is checking whether the target platform has a frame pointer or not. The code is using the `getSubtarget` method to get the target platform's register information, and then checking whether the target platform has a frame pointer by calling the `hasStackRealignment` method on the register information object. If the target platform has a frame pointer, the code sets the `HasFP` variable to `true`. It is possible" LLVM,ARC,160,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return HasFP;` This statement returns the value of the `HasFP` variable, which is a boolean value indicating whether the function has a frame pointer or not. The `HasFP` variable is set to `true` if any of the following conditions are met: * The target architecture has a frame pointer and the `DisableFramePointerElim` option is enabled. * The function has variable-sized objects on the stack. * The function's frame address is taken. * The function has stack realignment." LLVM,ARC,161,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet without knowing the context and the specific implementation of the functions being called. However, based on the names of the functions and variables, it appears that this code is related to generating stack adjustments for a stack-based architecture. The `ScalarAlloc` variable is being assigned the negative value of itself, which suggests that it may be used to track the amount of stack space that has been allocated. The `generateStackAdjustment` function is then called with a number of arguments, including the `ScalarAlloc` variable, which suggests that it" LLVM,ARC,162,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be: `int ScalarAlloc = MF.getFrameInfo().getStackSize();`. This is because the previous statement `MachineFunction &MF = *MBB.getParent();` is likely to be a reference to the parent function of the current machine basic block, and the next statement is likely to be a call to the `getFrameInfo()` method of the `MachineFunction` class, which returns a `FrameInfo` object that contains information about the stack frame of the function. The `getStackSize()` method of the" LLVM,ARC,163,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `FrameLowering` class and the `TargetFrameLowering` class. However, based on the information provided, it appears that the next statement will be the initialization of the `ST` member variable, which is likely to be a reference to the `Subtarget` object passed as an argument to the constructor. Here is a possible next statement: ``` ST = st; ``` This statement initializes the `ST` member variable to the `Subtarget` object passed as" LLVM,ARC,164,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `FrameLowering` class and the `TargetFrameLowering` class. However, based on the information provided, it appears that the next statement will be the initialization of the `ST` member variable, which is likely to be a reference to the `Subtarget` object passed as an argument to the constructor. Here is a possible next statement: ``` ST = st; ``` This statement initializes the `ST` member variable to the `Subtarget` object passed as" LLVM,ARC,165,"Based on the code snippet you provided, it appears that the next statement will be: `MFI.setObjectOffset(I.getFrameIdx(), CurOffset);` This is because the `for` loop is iterating over the elements of `CSI`, and `I` is the current element being iterated over. The `if` statement checks if `I.getFrameIdx()` is equal to ``, and if so, it sets the object offset for that frame index to `CurOffset`." LLVM,ARC,166,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `TargetFrameLowering::determineCalleeSaves(MF, SavedRegs, RS);` This is a function call to the `determineCalleeSaves` method of the `TargetFrameLowering` class, passing in the `MF` object, the `SavedRegs` object, and the `RS` object as arguments." LLVM,ARC,167,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `SavedRegs.set()` This is because the `determineCalleeSaves` method is called on the `TargetFrameLowering` object, which sets the callee-saved registers for the machine function `MF`. The `SavedRegs` bit vector is then set to the callee-saved registers using the `set` method." LLVM,ARC,168,"The next statement after the `assert` statement is the `if` statement. The `assert` statement is used to check if the condition `Reg.getReg() >= && Reg.getReg() <= && ` is true. If the condition is not true, the `assert` statement will throw an `AssertionError`. The `if` statement is used to check if the condition `Reg.getReg() > Last` is true. If the condition is true, the `Last` variable is assigned the value" LLVM,ARC,169,"The next statement after the `if` statement would be the `return` statement. The `return` statement returns the value of the `Last` variable, which is the largest value among all the values returned by the `getReg()` method." LLVM,ARC,170,"Based on the code snippet provided, it appears to be a part of a function that is dealing with function calls and stack management. The code is checking if the function has a frame pointer (FP) and if the amount of stack required for the call is greater than the maximum stack required for the function. If the function does not have an FP, the code updates the maximum stack required for the function. If the function has an FP, the code checks if the amount of stack required for the call is not equal to a specific value (NUM_LIT) and if the old opcode is either a specific string (" LLVM,ARC,171,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be: `BuildMI(MBB, MBBI, dl, TII->get(Opc), Reg).addReg(Reg, RegState::Kill).addImm(NumBytes);` This is because the code snippet ends with a call to `BuildMI`, which is a function that takes several arguments and returns a value. The next statement is likely to be the result of this function call, which is then chained with additional method calls using the dot operator." LLVM,ARC,172,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `AbsAmount = AbsAmount % ;` This statement is a modulo operation that calculates the remainder of `AbsAmount` divided by ``. The result of the modulo operation is assigned back to `AbsAmount`." LLVM,ARC,173,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `getSavedReg` function and the data stored in the `V` vector. However, based on the name of the function and the parameters it takes, it is likely that the next statement will be a search or lookup operation within the `V` vector to find the element that corresponds to the specified `reg` parameter." LLVM,ARC,174,"The next statement after the `for` loop will be the statement following the `for` loop, which is the `return` statement. The `for` loop will iterate over the elements of the vector `V`, and for each element, it will check if the value of the `reg` variable is equal to the value of the `getReg()` method of the current element. If the values are equal, the loop will return the current element. Therefore, the next statement after the `for` loop will be the `return` statement, which will return the current element if the values are equal" LLVM,ARC,175,"The next statement after the code snippet you provided is: `return HasFP;` This statement returns the value of the `HasFP` variable, which is a boolean value indicating whether the function has a frame pointer or not. The `HasFP` variable is set to `true` if any of the following conditions are met: * The target architecture has a frame pointer and the `DisableFramePointerElim` option is enabled. * The function has variable-sized objects on the stack. * The function's frame address is taken. * The function needs stack realignment" LLVM,ARC,176,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return HasFP;` The `hasFP` function returns a boolean value indicating whether the machine function has a frame pointer. The `HasFP` variable is set to true if any of the following conditions are met: * The target's frame pointer elimination option is disabled for the machine function. * The machine function has variable-sized objects. * The frame address is taken. * The target requires stack realignment. If any of these conditions are true, the function returns true, indicating that the machine function has a" LLVM,ARC,177,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `LLVM_DEBUG(dbgs() << << MFI.getStackSize() << );` This statement is a debug print statement that prints the stack size of the machine frame info `MFI`. The `` placeholders are used to represent string literals that are not specified in the code snippet." LLVM,ARC,178,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `LLVM_DEBUG(dbgs() << << MBB.getParent()->getName() << );` This statement is a debug print statement that prints the name of the parent function of the current basic block, along with some other information. The `LLVM_DEBUG` macro is used to ensure that the debug print statement is only executed when the `LLVM_DEBUG` flag is set to `true`." LLVM,ARC,179,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `O << "" ""; // Print a space`" LLVM,ARC,180,"The next statement after the code snippet you provided is: `return ;` This statement is a return statement that returns a string literal. The string literal is not specified in the code snippet you provided, so it is not possible to determine what the exact return value will be." LLVM,ARC,181,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific values of the string literals and the return values of the functions. However, based on the pattern of the code, it is likely that the next statement will be another `case` statement with a string literal and a return value." LLVM,ARC,182,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it appears to be a fragment of a switch statement and there is no context provided. However, based on the syntax and the fact that the code is using a switch statement, it is likely that the next statement will be another case statement or a default statement. It is also possible that the code is using a switch statement to handle different cases for a specific input, and the next statement could be a case statement that handles a specific input or a default statement that handles any input that is not explicitly handled by a case statement. Without more context" LLVM,ARC,183,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `CondCodeToString` function and the values of the variables `O`, `ISA_LIT`, `CondCode`, `MI`, `OpNum`, and `Imm`. However, based on the syntax and the context of the code, it is likely that the next statement will be a call to the `CondCodeToString` function, passing in the result of the `getOperand` method as an argument. The `getOperand` method is called on the `MI" LLVM,ARC,184,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `printInstruction(MI, Address, O);`" LLVM,ARC,185,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the `printU6ShiftedBy` function is not specified. However, based on the name of the function and the arguments it takes, it is likely that it prints the value of `U6` shifted by a certain number of bits. The `` placeholder in the function call suggests that the function takes a numeric literal as an argument, which is likely to be the number of bits to shift `U6` by. The `MI` and `OpNum` arguments are likely" LLVM,ARC,186,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `printOperand(MI, OpNum, O);` This is because the `if` statement that follows the `unsigned Value2 = Value >> ShiftBy` line is not executed, so the `assert(false && )` statement is not executed, and the `printOperand(MI, OpNum, O)` statement is the next one to be executed." LLVM,ARC,187,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific values of the variables and the behavior of the functions being called. However, based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the next statement will be an assertion that will always fail, as the condition `false && ` will always evaluate to `false`. The code snippet is likely part of a larger function that is designed to generate an error message when a certain condition is met. The `errs` function is being used to generate the error message, and the `getOpcode`" LLVM,ARC,188,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `case : return ;` This is a `switch` statement that checks the value of the `BRCC` parameter and returns a string literal based on the value. The `case` statement checks for a specific value of `BRCC` and returns the corresponding string literal if it matches. The next statement is another `case` statement that checks for a different value of `BRCC`." LLVM,ARC,189,"The code snippet you provided is a part of a function that is checking if a given expression is a binary expression with a symbolic reference expression as its left-hand side and a constant expression as its right-hand side. Based on the code snippet you provided, the next statement would be: Offset = CE->evaluateAsAbsolute ( ) ; This statement is assigning the result of the evaluateAsAbsolute() method of the constant expression (CE) to the Offset variable. The evaluateAsAbsolute() method returns the absolute value of the constant expression, which is a constant integer value" LLVM,ARC,190,"The next statement after the code snippet you provided is: `return BadConditionCode ( BRCC ) ;` This statement returns a value of type `BadConditionCode` with the condition code `BRCC`." LLVM,ARC,191,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific values of the string literals and the input to the function. However, based on the pattern of the code, it is likely that the next statement will be another `case` statement with a string literal and a corresponding `return` statement." LLVM,ARC,192,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific values of the string literals and the return values of the functions. However, based on the pattern of the code, it is likely that the next statement will be another case statement with a string literal and a return statement with a string literal." LLVM,ARC,193,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `InstPrinter::InstPrinter(const MCAsmInfo &MAI, const MCInstrInfo &MII, const MCRegisterInfo &MRI) : MCInstPrinter(MAI, MII, MRI) {` This is a constructor for the `InstPrinter` class, which is derived from the `MCInstPrinter` class. The constructor initializes the `InstPrinter` object with the given `MCAsmInfo`, `MCInstrInfo`, and `MCRegisterInfo` objects." LLVM,ARC,194,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `InstPrinter::InstPrinter(const MCAsmInfo &MAI, const MCInstrInfo &MII, const MCRegisterInfo &MRI) : MCInstPrinter(MAI, MII, MRI) {` This is a constructor for the `InstPrinter` class, which is derived from the `MCInstPrinter` class. The constructor initializes the `InstPrinter` object with the given `MCAsmInfo`, `MCInstrInfo`, and `MCRegisterInfo` objects." LLVM,ARC,195,"The next statement after the code snippet you provided is: `DEBUG ( dbgs ( ) << << cc << ) ;` This statement is a call to the `DEBUG` macro, which is defined in the `dbgs` header file. The macro takes a single argument, which is a string literal that is used as the debug message. The `<<` operator is used to concatenate the string literals and the `cc` variable, which is assumed to be a string. The resulting string is then passed to the `DEBUG` macro as" LLVM,ARC,196,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return ;` The `return` statement is used to return a value from a function. In this case, the function `BadConditionCode` is returning a string literal, which is represented by ``. The value of the string literal is not specified in the code snippet, so it could be any string." LLVM,ARC,197,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the code depends on the specific values of the variables and the implementation of the `getOperand` method. However, based on the code snippet provided, it is likely that the next statement will be a reference to the `Op` variable, which is a constant reference to the `MCOperand` object returned by the `getOperand` method. The `Op` variable is used to access the operand at the specified index in the `MI` object. Here is an example of what" LLVM,ARC,198,"The next statement after the code snippet you provided is: `Op.isImm() && ` This statement is a logical AND operation between the result of the `isImm()` method called on the `Op` object and the `` string literal. The result of this expression will be a boolean value indicating whether the `Op` object is an immediate operand and the string literal is not empty." LLVM,ARC,199,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be: OS << '+' << Offset; Explanation: The code snippet is part of a function that is processing a machine code expression. The expression is being cast to a constant expression using the `dyn_cast` function, and the `Offset` variable is being set to the value of the constant expression. If the expression is not a constant expression, it is being cast to a symbol reference expression using the `dyn_cast` function, and the `SRE` variable is being set to the symbol reference expression." LLVM,ARC,200,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `printInstruction(MI, O);` This statement calls the `printInstruction` function with the `MI` and `O` arguments. The `printInstruction` function is not defined in the code snippet provided, so it is not possible to determine what it does. However, based on the name of the function, it is likely that it prints the instruction represented by the `MI` argument to the `O` output stream, possibly with some additional annotation or formatting based on the `Annot` and `STI` arguments." LLVM,ARC,201,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `printInstruction(MI, O);` This statement calls the `printInstruction` function with the current instruction `MI` and the output stream `O`. The `printInstruction` function is responsible for printing the instruction to the output stream." LLVM,ARC,202,"The next statement of this code snippet is: printRegName(O, base.getReg()); This is because the code is using the `printRegName` function to print the name of the register specified by the `base` operand, which is obtained by calling the `getReg` method on the `base` operand. The `base` operand is a register operand, as asserted by the previous line of code." LLVM,ARC,203,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `O << Op.getImm();`" LLVM,ARC,204,"Based on the code snippet, it appears that the next statement will be: `printImmName(O, Op.getImm());` This is because the code checks if the operand is a register (`isReg()`) and if it is, it prints the register name using `printRegName()`. If the operand is not a register, it checks if it is an immediate value (`isImm()`) and if it is, it prints the immediate value using `printImmName()`." LLVM,ARC,205,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `const MCOperand &Operand = MI->getOperand(OpNum);` This statement retrieves the operand at the specified index (OpNum) from the MCInst object (MI) and stores it in the Operand variable." LLVM,ARC,206,"The next statement after the code snippet you provided is: `Op.isImm() && ` This statement is a logical AND operation between the result of the `isImm()` method called on the `Op` object and the `` string literal. The result of this expression will be a boolean value indicating whether the `Op` object is an immediate operand and the string literal is not empty." LLVM,ARC,207,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the `printRegName` function is dependent on the specific implementation of the `InstPrinter` class and the values of the `OS` and `RegNo` parameters. However, based on the name of the function and the parameters it takes, it is likely that the function is responsible for printing the name of a register to the output stream `OS`. The `RegNo` parameter is likely an integer that represents the number of the register to be printed. Without more information about the specific implementation" LLVM,ARC,208,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the `printRegName` function is dependent on the specific implementation of the `InstPrinter` class and the values of the `OS` and `RegNo` parameters. However, based on the name of the function and the parameters it takes, it is likely that the function is responsible for printing the name of a register to the output stream `OS`. The `RegNo` parameter is likely an integer that represents the number of the register to be printed. Without more information about the specific implementation" LLVM,ARC,209,"The next statement of the code snippet is: `if (CantAnalyze) return false;`" LLVM,ARC,210,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be a call to the `getMachineMemOperand` method of the `MachineFrameInfo` class, passing in the `MachinePointerInfo` object and the `FrameIndex` as arguments. The method will return a `MachineMemOperand` object that represents the memory operand for the frame pointer. Here is the predicted next statement: ``` MachineMemOperand *MMO = MFI.getMachineMemOperand(MachinePointerInfo::getFixedStack(MF, FrameIndex), MachineMemOperand::MOLoad, MFI." LLVM,ARC,211,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty because it is not a complete code snippet and there are multiple possible next statements depending on the context and the specific implementation of the functions and classes involved. However, based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the next statement could be a call to the `getSpillSize` method of the `TRI` object, passing in the `RC` object as an argument. The `getSpillSize` method is likely to return a value that is then compared to the value of the `Align` variable in the code snippet" LLVM,ARC,212,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `MMO->setOffset(MFI.getObjectOffset(FrameIndex));` This statement sets the offset of the memory operand `MMO` to the object offset of the stack slot corresponding to the frame index. The `getObjectOffset` method of the `MachineFrameInfo` class is used to retrieve the offset of the stack slot." LLVM,ARC,213,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be a call to the `dbgs()` function, which is used for debugging purposes. The `dbgs()` function returns a reference to a `raw_ostream` object, which is used to output debug information to the console or a log file. The statement `dbgs() << << printReg(DestReg, TRI) << << FrameIndex << ` is likely to output a debug message to the console or a log file, with the format `" LLVM,ARC,214,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `MMO->setAlignment(Align);`" LLVM,ARC,215,"This code snippet is from the LLVM project and is related to the optimization of memory accesses. It is using the LLVM IR (Intermediate Representation) to generate machine code for a specific target architecture. The code is creating a new machine memory operand (MMO) for a load operation, and it is using the frame index to determine the alignment of the object being loaded. It is also asserting that the spill size of the register class (RC) is equal to a specific value, and that the register class has a certain subclass. The next statement of this code snippet is likely" LLVM,ARC,216,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `MachineFunction` class and the `getMachineMemOperand` method. However, based on the context and the names of the variables, it appears that the next statement is likely to be related to the allocation of memory for a stack frame. The `MachineFunction` class is a part of the LLVM compiler infrastructure, and it represents a function in the machine code level. The `getMachineMemOperand` method is used to get a machine memory operand, which is a" LLVM,ARC,217,"This code snippet appears to be part of a larger function that is generating machine code for a specific architecture. The code is using the LLVM library to create and manipulate machine code instructions. The next statement in the code snippet is likely to be a call to the `BuildMI` function, which is used to create a new machine code instruction. The `BuildMI` function takes several arguments, including the basic block, instruction, debug location, and a string literal that represents the instruction opcode. The function returns a `MachineInstr` object, which is then used to add additional information to the instruction, such as" LLVM,ARC,218,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be the call to the `BuildMI` function, which is used to create a new machine instruction. The function takes several arguments, including the machine basic block, the instruction iterator, the debug location, the instruction opcode, and the destination and source registers. The `get` function is called to retrieve the opcode for the instruction, and the `addReg` function is called to add the source and destination registers to the instruction." LLVM,ARC,219,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific inputs and the behavior of the `MI` object. However, based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the next statement will be: `return false;` This is because the code checks if the operand at position `BasePos` is a register and the operand at position `OffsetPos` is an immediate value. If either of these conditions is not met, the function returns `false`." LLVM,ARC,220,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return true;` Explanation: The `getBaseAndOffsetPosition` function is checking if the `MachineInstr` object `MI` may load or store data. If it does not, the function returns `false`. Otherwise, it sets the `BasePos` and `OffsetPos` variables to some values and returns `true`. The code snippet you provided does not include the next statement, but based on the context, it is likely that the next statement would be `return true;`." LLVM,ARC,221,"This code snippet is part of a function that is trying to determine the length of an inline assembly instruction. The function takes a `MachineFunction` object and a number (`NUM_LIT`) as input, and it uses these inputs to retrieve the symbol name of the inline assembly instruction and the `MCAsmInfo` object associated with the target machine. The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be a call to the `getInlineAsmLength` function, which takes the symbol name and the `MCAsmInfo` object as input and returns the length of the inline assembly instruction. The return" LLVM,ARC,222,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the program depends on the input and the specific implementation of the `getOperand` and `getSymbolName` methods. However, based on the code snippet provided, it is likely that the next statement will be a call to the `getSymbolName` method on the result of the `getOperand` method, passing in the value of the `` parameter as an argument. This will retrieve the symbol name associated with the operand at the specified index in the machine instruction." LLVM,ARC,223,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `if (Cond.empty()) {` This is because the `assert` statements are used to check for certain conditions, and if they are not met, the program will terminate with an error message. In this case, the first `assert` statement checks that `TBB` is not null and that the string literal is not null, and the second `assert` statement checks that the size of `Cond` is equal to either 1 or 2, and that the string literal is not null. If either of these conditions is not met, the program" LLVM,ARC,224,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `MachineInstr` and `MCInstrDesc` classes, as well as the values of the `MI` and `MID` variables. However, based on the naming conventions used in the code, it is likely that the next statement will be a check of the `MID` variable to determine if it represents a post-increment instruction." LLVM,ARC,225,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the value of the `MID` and `TSFlags` variables, which are not provided in the code snippet. However, based on the syntax of the code snippet, it appears to be extracting a value from a bit field. The `MID` variable is likely a bit field, and the `TSFlags` variable is likely a set of flags that are used to extract specific values from the bit field. Without more information about the specific values of the `MID` and `TS" LLVM,ARC,226,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be a comparison of the value of `F` with the value of `PreInc`. The code is using the bitwise right shift operator (`>>`) to shift the value of `F` to the right by the number of bits specified by `TSF_AddrModeOff`. The result of this operation is then bitwise ANDed with the value of `TSF_AddModeMask` to extract the relevant bits. The final comparison is then made between the result of this operation and the value of `PreInc`. If the result of" LLVM,ARC,227,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `RI.init ( ST );` This statement initializes the `RI` object, which is an instance of the `RegisterInfo` class, using the `Subtarget` object `ST`." LLVM,ARC,228,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `RI.init ( ST );` This statement initializes the `RI` object, which is an instance of the `RegisterInfo` class, using the `Subtarget` object `ST`." LLVM,ARC,229,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific values of the variables and the behavior of the functions being called. However, based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the next statement will be a call to the `BuildMI` function, passing in the `MBB`, `I`, `DL`, `get()`, and `DestReg` variables as arguments. The `BuildMI` function is likely to be a function that builds a machine instruction, and the arguments being passed in are likely to be used to specify the details" LLVM,ARC,230,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be the call to the `BuildMI` function, which is used to create a new machine instruction. The function takes several arguments, including the machine basic block, the instruction iterator, the debug location, the name of the instruction, and the destination and source registers. The `BuildMI` function is likely to create a new machine instruction with the specified parameters and add it to the machine basic block." LLVM,ARC,231,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be: MIB.add(Cond[i]); This is because the code is currently in a loop that iterates over the elements of the Cond array, and the current statement is adding the current element to the MachineInstrBuilder object." LLVM,ARC,232,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific values of the variables and the implementation of the functions being called. However, based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the next statement will be: `return BuildMI(MBB, MI, DL, get(), Reg).addImm(Value).getInstr();` This statement is likely to be executed if the condition `isInt < > (Value)` is true, which means that the value of `Value" LLVM,ARC,233,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be: `MMO->setDebugLoc(DL);` This is because the previous statement in the code snippet is `MachineMemOperand *MMO = MF.getMachineMemOperand(MachinePointerInfo::getFixedStack(MF, FrameIndex), MachineMemOperand::MOLoad, MFI.getObjectSize(FrameIndex), MFI.getObjectAlign(FrameIndex));`, which creates a new `MachineMemOperand` object and sets its properties. The next logical step would be to set the debug location for" LLVM,ARC,234,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return false;` Explanation: The code snippet is a part of a function that appears to be handling a conditional branch in a compiler or interpreter. The first line of the snippet is an assertion that checks if the size of the `Cond` array is equal to a certain number (``) and if a certain string (``) is present in the `Cond` array. If the assertion fails, the function will return `false`. The second line of the snippet sets the immediate value of" LLVM,ARC,235,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `LLVM_DEBUG(dbgs() << << printReg(SrcReg, TRI) << << FrameIndex << );` This statement is a debug print statement that uses the `dbgs()` function to print a message to the debug console. The message includes several string literals (``) and the result of the `printReg()` function, which is called with the `SrcReg` and `TRI` arguments. The `" LLVM,ARC,236,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be another `assert` statement, as the previous two statements are also `assert` statements. The next statement is likely to be a check on the value of `FrameIndex` or the value of the `DestReg` register. It's difficult to predict the exact statement without knowing the context of the code and the purpose of the `assert` statements. However, based on the pattern of the previous two statements, it's likely that the next statement will be another `assert` statement that checks the value of a variable or a register." LLVM,ARC,237,"This code snippet is part of a larger function that appears to be generating machine code for a specific architecture. The code is using a number of custom data structures and functions, so it's difficult to provide a definitive answer without more context. However, based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the next statement will be a call to the `BuildMI` function, which is likely to be a function that constructs a machine instruction. The `BuildMI` function takes several arguments, including a pointer to a `MachineBasicBlock` structure, a pointer to a `MachineInstr` structure, a pointer to a" LLVM,ARC,238,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the code depends on the specific inputs and the implementation of the `MachineBasicBlock` and `MachineFunction` classes. However, based on the names of the variables and the methods being called, it appears that the code is trying to retrieve the debug location information for a machine basic block (MBB) and use it to get the frame information for the machine function (MF) that contains the MBB. Here is a possible next statement: ``` MachineFrameInfo &MFI = MF" LLVM,ARC,239,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `InstrInfo :: InstrInfo ( const Subtarget & ST ) : GenInstrInfo ( , ) , ST ( ST ) , RI ( ST ) {` This is a constructor for the `InstrInfo` class, which takes a `const Subtarget&` reference as an argument and initializes the `ST` and `RI` members" LLVM,ARC,240,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `InstrInfo :: InstrInfo ( const Subtarget & ST ) : GenInstrInfo ( , ) , ST ( ST ) , RI ( ST ) {` This is a constructor for the `InstrInfo` class, which takes a `const Subtarget&` reference as an argument and initializes the `ST` and `RI` members" LLVM,ARC,241,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `MachineInstr &InstToDelete = *DI;` This statement is assigning the value of the `MachineInstr` object pointed to by the iterator `DI` to the variable `InstToDelete`. The `InstToDelete` variable is then used in the following statement to delete the instruction from the basic block." LLVM,ARC,242,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `InstrInfo` class and the context in which it is being used. However, based on the name of the method and the fact that it is a member of the `InstrInfo` class, it is likely that this method is used to anchor the `InstrInfo` object to a specific location in memory, such as a specific instruction or a specific address." LLVM,ARC,243,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `InstrInfo` class and the context in which it is being used. However, based on the name of the method and the fact that it is a member of the `InstrInfo` class, it is likely that this method is used to anchor the `InstrInfo` object to a specific location in memory, such as a specific instruction or a specific address." LLVM,ARC,244,"Based on the code snippet you provided, it appears that the `InstrInfo` class is being defined as a subclass of `GenInstrInfo`. The `InstrInfo` class is also defining a constructor that takes no arguments and initializes the `GenInstrInfo` base class with two string literals. Therefore, the next statement in the code snippet is likely to be the definition of the `RI` method, which is being defined as a member function of the `InstrInfo` class. The `RI` method is likely to be used to retrieve or manipulate the instruction information stored in the" LLVM,ARC,245,"Based on the code snippet you provided, it appears that the `InstrInfo` class is being defined as a subclass of `GenInstrInfo`. The `InstrInfo` class is also defining a constructor that takes no arguments and initializes the `GenInstrInfo` base class with two string literals. Therefore, the next statement in the code snippet is likely to be the definition of the `RI` method, which is being defined as a member function of the `InstrInfo` class. The `RI` method is likely to be used to retrieve or manipulate the instruction information stored in the" LLVM,ARC,246,"The next statement after the given code snippet is likely to be another assertion statement, as the code is checking the validity of the input data. The first assertion statement checks if the source register (SrcReg) is contained in the string literal (). The second assertion statement checks if the destination register (DestReg) is contained in the string literal (). Therefore, the next statement is likely to be another assertion statement that checks the validity of the input data, possibly by checking if the source and destination registers are valid registers in the system." LLVM,ARC,247,"The next statement after the given code snippet is likely to be another assertion statement, as the code is checking the validity of the input data. The first assertion statement checks if the source register (SrcReg) is contained in the string literal (). The second assertion statement checks if the destination register (DestReg) is contained in the string literal (). Therefore, the next statement is likely to be another assertion statement that checks the validity of the input data, possibly by checking if the source and destination registers are valid registers in the system." LLVM,ARC,248,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `getInlineAsmLength` function and the `AsmStr` and `MF` variables. However, based on the context of the code, it is likely that the next statement will be a call to the `getDesc` method of the `MI` variable, which is an instance of a class that has a `getSize` method. Therefore, the next statement of this code snippet is likely to be: ``` return MI.getDesc().get" LLVM,ARC,249,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return MI . getDesc ( ) . getSize ( ) ;` This statement returns the size of the machine instruction represented by the `MI` object, which is an instance of the `MachineInstr` class. The `getDesc` method is used to retrieve the `MachineInstrDesc` object associated with the `MI` object, and the `getSize` method is used to retrieve the size of the machine instruction." LLVM,ARC,250,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific values of the string literals and the return values of the functions. However, based on the syntax and structure of the code, it appears that the next statement will be another case statement, possibly with a similar structure to the previous case statements. It's also worth noting that the code snippet is using a switch statement with string literals as the cases, which is not a common or recommended practice in most programming languages. It's possible that the code is using a custom or third-party library that" LLVM,ARC,251,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the implementation of the `getRegisterInfo` method and the specific values of the `ISA_LIT` constant and the `RegisterInfo` class. However, based on the name of the method and the return type, it is likely that the method returns a reference to an object of type `RegisterInfo` that contains information about a register." LLVM,ARC,252,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the context in which the code is being executed. However, based on the syntax and the fact that the `return` statement is used to return a value from a function, it is likely that the next statement after `return RI` will be the end of the function." LLVM,ARC,253,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `MIB.add(Cond[i]);`" LLVM,ARC,254,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the code depends on the value of the `Opc` variable, which is not specified in the code snippet. However, based on the name of the function and the fact that it is checking if the opcode is a conditional branch instruction, it is likely that the next statement will be a comparison of the `Opc` variable with a set of values that represent conditional branch instructions." LLVM,ARC,255,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the `isJumpOpcode` function depends on the value of the `Opc` parameter. However, based on the name of the function and the fact that it is declared as `static`, it is likely that this function is used to determine whether a given opcode is a jump instruction. In this case, the next statement of the code snippet would likely be a `return` statement that returns a boolean value indicating whether the opcode is a jump instruction or not." LLVM,ARC,256,"The next statement of this code snippet is: return Opcode == || Opcode == || Opcode == ; This statement is a return statement that returns a boolean value indicating whether the Opcode is equal to one of the three string literals." LLVM,ARC,257,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the `isLoad` function depends on the value of the `Opcode` parameter. However, based on the name of the function and the parameter name, it is likely that the function returns `true` if the `Opcode` is a load instruction and `false` otherwise." LLVM,ARC,258,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `MachineInstr` class and the `getOpcode()` method. However, based on the name of the method and the parameters it takes, it appears that the method is checking if a machine instruction is a load from a stack slot. If this is the case, then the next statement of the code snippet is likely to be a check of the opcode of the machine instruction to determine if it is a load instruction. The opcode is an integer value that represents the type of instruction," LLVM,ARC,259,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return Opcode == || Opcode == || Opcode == ;` This statement is a return statement that returns a boolean value indicating whether the given opcode is a store instruction. The opcode is compared to three different string literals, and if any of the comparisons are true, the function returns true. If none of the comparisons are true, the function returns false." LLVM,ARC,260,"The next statement of this code snippet is: return Opc == ; This statement is a return statement that returns a boolean value indicating whether the opcode is an unconditional branch opcode. The placeholder is a string literal that represents the opcode for an unconditional branch instruction." LLVM,ARC,261,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the code depends on the specific values of the variables and the logic of the program. However, based on the syntax and the context of the code, it is likely that the next statement will be a comparison or assignment operation, as the code appears to be checking the value of the `Opc` variable against a string literal." LLVM,ARC,262,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return Op.isImm() && Op.getImm() == ;` This statement is a boolean expression that checks if the `Op` object is an immediate value and if its immediate value is equal to ``. If both conditions are true, the function returns `true`, otherwise it returns `false`." LLVM,ARC,263,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return Op.isImm() && Op.getImm() == ;` This statement is a boolean expression that checks if the `Op` object is an immediate operand and if its immediate value is equal to ``. If both conditions are true, the statement returns `true`, otherwise it returns `false`." LLVM,ARC,264,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it appears to be a fragment of a larger program and the context is not provided. However, based on the syntax and the functions used, it appears that the code is attempting to generate machine code for a specific instruction set architecture (ISA) using the LLVM library. The `BuildMI` function is likely building a machine instruction using the `MBB` and `MI` parameters, which are likely machine code blocks and machine instructions, respectively. The `dl` parameter is likely a pointer to a data label, and the `" LLVM,ARC,265,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `MachineInstr *Instr = new MachineInstr(dl, Reg, Value);` This statement creates a new `MachineInstr` object with the specified debug location `dl`, register `Reg`, and immediate value `Value`. The `MachineInstr` object is then returned as the result of the `loadImmediate` function." LLVM,ARC,266,"This code snippet is a part of a larger program that is dealing with memory management and allocation. It is using a library called `MachineFrame` to manage the memory. The code is creating a new `MachineMemOperand` object, which is a part of the `MachineFrame` library. The object is created using the `getMachineMemOperand` method of the `MachineFrame` object, which takes several parameters. The first parameter is a `MachinePointerInfo` object, which is used to specify the type of memory being allocated. In this case, it is using the `getFixedStack" LLVM,ARC,267,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return false;` Explanation: The `reverseBranchCondition` method is called with a `SmallVectorImpl` of `MachineOperand`s, which is a vector of machine operands. The method asserts that the size of the vector is equal to `` and that the vector contains only a single element, which is a `MachineOperand` with a `ReverseBranch` condition. If the assertion fails, the method returns `false`. Otherwise, it returns `true`." LLVM,ARC,268,"This code snippet appears to be part of a larger function that is generating machine code for a specific architecture. The code is using the LLVM library to create and manipulate machine code instructions. The next statement in the code snippet is likely to be a call to the `BuildMI` function, which is used to create a new machine code instruction. The `BuildMI` function takes several arguments, including the basic block, instruction, debug location, and a string literal that represents the instruction opcode. The function returns a `MachineInstr` object, which is then used to add additional information to the instruction, such as" LLVM,ARC,269,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `DAGToDAGISel` class and the `SelectionDAGISel` class. However, based on the names of the classes and the constructor parameters, it is likely that the next statement will be a call to the `SelectionDAGISel` constructor, which will initialize the `SelectionDAGISel` object with the given `TargetMachine` and `CodeGenOpt::Level` parameters. Here is an example of what the next statement might look like:" LLVM,ARC,270,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `DAGToDAGISel` class and the `SelectionDAGISel` class. However, based on the names of the classes and the constructor parameters, it is likely that the next statement will be a call to the `SelectionDAGISel` constructor, which will initialize the `SelectionDAGISel` object with the given `TargetMachine` and `CodeGenOpt::Level` parameters. Here is an example of what the next statement might look like:" LLVM,ARC,271,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet without knowing the context and the specific implementation of the `DAGToDAGISel` class. However, based on the name of the class and the method being called, it is likely that the next statement will be related to the creation of a new instance of the `DAGToDAGISel` class, possibly with the `TM` and `OptLevel` parameters being passed to the constructor." LLVM,ARC,272,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be the return statement, which returns a new instance of the DAGToDAGISel class, passing in the target machine and code generation optimization level as arguments. Here's a breakdown of the code snippet: * The function is named `createISelDag`, where `ISA_LIT` is a placeholder for the name of the instruction set architecture (ISA) being targeted. * The function takes two arguments: a reference to a ;` would be the end of the function. LLVM,ARC,274,The next statement after `return ;` would be the end of the function. LLVM,ARC,275,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `Addr` class and the values of the operands. However, based on the code provided, it appears that the next statement will be: `RHSC = -RHSC;` This is because the `if` statement checks if the result of `Addr.getOpcode()` is equal to ``, and if so, it sets `RHSC` to the negative of its current value. The next statement after the `if`" LLVM,ARC,276,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return false;` Explanation: The `SelectAddrModeFar` function is checking if the address mode is far, and if so, it returns `false`. If the address mode is not far, it continues to the next check. The next check is whether the RHS of the address is a constant, and if so, it sets the base and offset values accordingly. If the RHS is not a constant, it returns `false`. Therefore, the next statement of this code snippet is `return false;`." LLVM,ARC,277,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the program depends on the specific values of the variables and the implementation of the `Addr` class. However, based on the code snippet, it appears that the program is checking the opcode of an address and if it is equal to a specific value (represented by ``), it will execute a certain block of code." LLVM,ARC,278,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `getTargetConstant` method and the values of the input parameters. However, based on the syntax and the context of the code, it is likely that the next statement after the `return true` statement would be the end of the method or function. In other words, the `return true` statement is likely to be the last statement in the method or function, and the next statement would be the end of the method or function." LLVM,ARC,279,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `Offset = CurDAG->getTargetConstant(, SDLoc(Addr), );`" LLVM,ARC,280,"Based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the next statement will be: `if (Base.getOpcode() == ) {` This is because the previous `if` statement checks if the `Base` operand of the `Addr` instruction is a `ConstantSDNode`, and if it is, it sets the `RHSC` variable to the signed extension of the constant value. If the `Base` operand is not a `ConstantSDNode`, the `RHSC` variable is set to the negative of the signed extension of the" LLVM,ARC,281,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet without knowing the context and the implementation of the `CurDAG`, `CN`, and `SDLoc` classes. However, based on the syntax and the names of the methods being called, it appears that the code is trying to retrieve a constant value from a data access graph (DAG) and store it in a variable called `Pred`. The `getTargetConstant` method is being called on the `CurDAG` object, which suggests that the method is trying to retrieve a constant value from the DAG. The `CN` object is" LLVM,ARC,282,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `CurDAG` and `CN` classes, as well as the values of the variables `N` and ``. However, based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the next statement will be a call to the `getTargetConstant` method of the `CurDAG` class, passing in the result of the `getZExtValue` method of the `CN` class, the value of the `SDLoc` variable, and the string literal `<" LLVM,ARC,283,"Based on the code snippet provided, it is difficult to predict the next statement with certainty. However, we can make an educated guess based on the context and patterns in the code. The code appears to be working with a data structure that represents a memory address, and it is checking if the address is a constant value. If the address is a constant, it is extracting the base and offset values from the address and storing them in variables. Based on this information, it is likely that the next statement will be related to working with the base and offset values, such as calculating a memory address or performing" LLVM,ARC,284,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific values of the variables and the behavior of the functions being called. However, based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the next statement will be: `Base = CurDAG->getTargetFrameIndex(FIN->getIndex(), );` This is because the code checks if `CN` is a `ConstantSDNode` and if its value is greater than or equal to a certain value, and if those conditions are met, it sets `Base` to" LLVM,ARC,285,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `RegInfo . addLiveIn ( VA . getLocReg ( ) , VReg ) ;`" LLVM,ARC,286,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific inputs and the behavior of the functions being called. However, based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the next statement will be a return statement, as the code is setting up the return value for the function. The code is using the `assert` statement to check that the value of the `Op` operand is equal to a specific value, and that the value of the `FrameReg` register is equal to a specific value. If these conditions are not met, the code will throw an assertion" LLVM,ARC,287,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be the return statement, which returns a value of type `SDNode` created by the `getCopyFromReg` method of the `DAG` object. The `getCopyFromReg` method takes several arguments, including the entry node of the DAG, a location, a register, and a value type, and returns a new `SDNode` object that represents a copy operation from the specified register to the specified location. The code snippet is likely to be part of a function that is responsible for generating code for a specific instruction or operation, and the `" LLVM,ARC,288,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `llvm_unreachable()` Explanation: The code snippet is part of a function that is processing the arguments of a function call. The function is using the `llvm_unreachable` intrinsic to indicate that it is not possible to reach the code that follows the `if` statement. The `llvm_unreachable` intrinsic is used to indicate that a particular code path is not possible, and it is typically used in situations where the compiler can prove that a" LLVM,ARC,289,"Based on the pattern of the previous cases, it is likely that the next statement will be: case : return LowerGLOBAL_VAR (Op, DAG); This is because the previous cases all have the form `case : return Lower...(Op, DAG);`, where `Lower...` is a function that takes an `Op` and a `DAG` as arguments and returns a value. The next case is likely to follow the same pattern, with a different function name." LLVM,ARC,290,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet without knowing the specific values of the variables and the behavior of the functions being called. However, based on the syntax and the context, it appears that the code is using the LLVM library to perform some kind of optimization or transformation on a directed acyclic graph (DAG). The code is using the `LLVM_DEBUG` macro to print debug information to the console, and it is using the `dbgs` function to create a debug stream. The code is also using the `dump` function to print the contents of a node in the D" LLVM,ARC,291,"Based on the given code snippet, it is difficult to predict the next statement with certainty. However, based on the pattern of the previous statements, it is likely that the next statement will be another call to the `setOperationAction` method with the same or similar arguments. The `setOperationAction` method is called multiple times in the code snippet, and each time it is called with three arguments: a string literal, another string literal, and a value that is either `Legal`, `Custom`, or `Expand`. The method is used to set the operation action for a specific operation, and the arguments passed" LLVM,ARC,292,"Based on the given code snippet, it appears that the `setOperationAction` function is being called multiple times with different arguments. The function takes three arguments: a string literal, another string literal, and a value that can be either `Legal`, `Custom`, or `Expand`. The next statement in the code snippet is `setOperationAction ( , , Custom ) ;`, which sets the operation action to `Custom` for the given string literals." LLVM,ARC,293,"Based on the code snippet provided, it is difficult to predict the next statement with certainty. However, based on the context and the pattern of the code, it is likely that the next statement will be another call to the `setOperationAction` method, possibly with different parameters. The `setOperationAction` method is called multiple times in the code snippet, each time with a different parameter for the `opc` argument. The `opc` argument is an integer that represents the operation code, and the method is used to set the action for each operation code. The `setOperationAction` method" LLVM,ARC,294,"Based on the code snippet provided, it appears to be a part of a function that is defining the properties of a register in a computer architecture. The function is called `computeRegisterProperties` and it takes a `Subtarget` object as an argument. The function first calls `getRegisterInfo` on the `Subtarget` object to get the register information, and then sets various properties of the register based on the information obtained. The next statement in the code snippet is `setStackPointerRegisterToSaveRestore();`, which sets the stack pointer register to save and restore" LLVM,ARC,295,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `CCInfo.SetCallingConv(CallConv);` This is because the `CCInfo` object is an instance of the `CCState` class, which has a method called `SetCallingConv` that takes a `CallingConv::ID` as an argument. The `CallConv` parameter is passed to this method to set the calling convention for the `CCInfo` object." LLVM,ARC,296,"The next statement after the code snippet you provided is: `return nullptr;` This is because the `switch` statement has no `default` case, and the value of the `switch` expression (``) does not match any of the `case` labels. Therefore, the control flow falls through to the `return nullptr;` statement at the end of the function." LLVM,ARC,297,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific values of the string literals and the input to the function. However, based on the pattern of the code, it appears that the next statement will be a `return` statement with a string literal as the argument." LLVM,ARC,298,"This code snippet appears to be a switch statement in a programming language. The switch statement is checking the value of a string literal and returning a different string literal based on the value of the input string. The next statement in the code snippet is: case : return ; This statement is checking the value of the input string against a specific string literal, and returning a different string literal if the input string matches the case. The placeholders represent the actual string literals that are being compared and returned." LLVM,ARC,299,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet without knowing the specific implementation of the `TargetLowering` class and the `isLegalAddressingMode` method. However, based on the method signature and the fact that it is a `const` method, it is likely that the next statement will be a check or a computation that determines whether the given addressing mode is legal for the target architecture. Some possible next statements could include: * Checking the size of the addressing mode to ensure it is within the legal range for the target architecture. * Checking the type of" LLVM,ARC,300,"Based on the code snippet provided, it appears to be a part of a function that is generating a node in a directed acyclic graph (DAG) representing a computation. The function takes an operation `Op` as input and generates a node in the DAG based on the operands of the operation. The code snippet you provided is difficult to read and understand without more context, but based on the variable names and the structure of the code, it appears to be generating a node for a conditional branch instruction. The `SDValue` variables `LHS`, `RHS`, and `Dest` are likely representing" LLVM,ARC,301,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `SDValue Call = DAG.getNode(, dl, NodeTys, Ops);` This statement creates a new SDValue object `Call` using the `getNode` method of the `DAG` object, with the following parameters: * ``: The name of the instruction to be generated. * `dl`: The data layout object. * `NodeTys`: The list of types of the instruction's operands. * `Ops`: The list" LLVM,ARC,302,The next statement after the `llvm_unreachable` call is the `case CallingConv::C` statement. LLVM,ARC,303,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it appears to be part of a larger function and the context is not provided. However, based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the next statement may be related to the `DAG` object and the `getCopyFromReg` method. The `DAG` object is likely an instance of a class that represents a directed acyclic graph (DAG), which is a common data structure used to represent relationships between objects. The `getCopyFromReg` method is likely a method of the `DAG` class" LLVM,ARC,304,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `MachineFrameInfo` class and the `setFrameAddressIsTaken` method. However, based on the name of the method and the context in which it is called, it is likely that the next statement will set the frame address to a value that indicates that the frame address is taken. Here is a possible next statement: ``` MFI.setFrameAddress(ARI.getFrameAddress()); ``` This statement would set the frame address to the value returned by `" LLVM,ARC,305,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `getTargetGlobalAddress` and `getNode` methods, as well as the values of the variables `GN`, `DL`, and `Offset`. However, based on the names of the methods and the context of the code, it is likely that the next statement will be a call to the `getNode` method, passing in the `GA` value as the first argument, and the `dl` value as the second argument. The `getNode` method is likely to return a" LLVM,ARC,306,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `getTargetGlobalAddress` method and the values of the variables `GN`, `GV`, `dl`, and `Offset`. However, based on the names of the variables and the method being called, it is likely that the next statement will involve the creation of a global address for the variable `GV` with the specified offset. Here are a few possibilities for what the next statement could be: 1. `GA = DAG.getTargetGlobalAddress(GV, dl," LLVM,ARC,307,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return DAG.getNode(, SDLoc(N), , GA);` This statement is a call to the `getNode` method of the `DAG` object, passing in several arguments: * ``: This is a string literal that represents the name of the node to be created. * `SDLoc(N)`: This is a `SDLoc` object that represents the location of the node in the source code. * `: return LowerGLOBAL_VAR (Op, DAG); This is because the previous cases all have the form `case : return Lower...(Op, DAG);`, where `Lower...` is a function that takes an `Op` and a `DAG` as arguments and returns a value. The next case is likely to follow the same pattern, with a different function name." LLVM,ARC,309,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `int Offset = VA.getLocMemOffset();`." LLVM,ARC,310,"The next statement of the code snippet is: `Chain = DAG.getCopyToReg(Chain, dl, VA.getLocReg(), OutVals[i], Flag);` This statement is part of a loop that iterates over the `RVLocs` vector, and for each element `VA` in the vector, it creates a new copy of the value `OutVals[i]` to the register `VA.getLocReg()`. The `Flag` variable is used to keep track of the current state of the copy operation." LLVM,ARC,311,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific values of the operands and the implementation of the `getOperand` and `get` methods. However, based on the code snippet, it appears that the next statement is likely to be a comparison between the `LHS` and `RHS` values, using the condition code specified by `CC`. The `TVal` and `FVal` values are likely to be used as the true and false values of the comparison, respectively. The `SDLoc` object is likely to be used to specify the" LLVM,ARC,312,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `SDValue SR = DAG.getNode(, dl, , LS, DAG.getConstant( - Width, dl, ));` This statement creates a new `SDValue` object called `SR` using the `getNode` method of the `DAG` object. The `getNode` method takes several arguments, including the node type, the debug location, the operation code, and the operands. In" LLVM,ARC,313,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return Op;` Explanation: The code snippet is checking the value type of the `Op` object and its operand. If the value type is not a string or if the operand is not a valid VTSDNode, the code returns `Op`. Otherwise, it checks the width of the operand and returns an empty list if the width is not equal to 32 or 64." LLVM,ARC,314,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `SDLoc` and `EVT` classes, as well as the `DAG` object. However, based on the code provided, it appears that the next statement will likely be a call to the `getFrameIndex` method of the `DAG` object, passing in the result of the `getVarArgsFrameIndex` method of the `FuncInfo` object and the `PtrVT` object. The `getFrameIndex` method is likely to return a `SDValue`" LLVM,ARC,315,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet without knowing the specific implementation of the `TargetLowering` class and the `mayBeEmittedAsTailCall` method. However, based on the name of the method and the parameters it takes, it is likely that the next statement will check if the given `CallInst` can be emitted as a tail call. Here are a few possibilities for what the next statement could be: 1. A check to see if the `CallInst` is a tail call: ``` if (CI->isTailCall()) {" LLVM,ARC,316,"The next statement of this code snippet is: return false;" LLVM,ARC,317,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `SDValue TargetLowering :: PerformDAGCombine ( SDNode * N , DAGCombinerInfo & DCI ) const { return { } ;` This is a method definition for the `PerformDAGCombine` method of the `TargetLowering` class, which is a subclass of `SDValue`. The method takes two arguments: `N`, which is a pointer to an `SDNode` object, and `DCI`, which is a reference to a `DAGCombiner" LLVM,ARC,318,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet without knowing the specific implementation of the `PerformDAGCombine` function and the `SDValue` class. However, based on the name of the function and the class, it appears that this code is related to the optimization of a directed acyclic graph (DAG) using a combiner. The `PerformDAGCombine` function is likely to be a member function of the `SDValue` class, and it is called with a `SDNode` pointer and a `DAGCombinerInfo` reference as arguments." LLVM,ARC,319,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `MF.setAlignment();` This statement sets the alignment of the `MachineFunction` object `MF` to ``." LLVM,ARC,320,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be the initialization of the member variables of the `FunctionInfo` class, based on the constructor's parameters. Here's a breakdown of the code snippet: * `explicit FunctionInfo ( MachineFunction & MF )`: This is the constructor of the `FunctionInfo` class, which takes a reference to a `MachineFunction` object as its parameter. The `explicit` keyword is used to indicate that this constructor can only be called with an explicit argument list, and not through implicit conversion. *" LLVM,ARC,321,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be the initialization of the member variables of the `FunctionInfo` class, based on the constructor's parameters. Here's a breakdown of the code snippet: * `explicit FunctionInfo ( MachineFunction & MF )`: This is the constructor of the `FunctionInfo` class, which takes a reference to a `MachineFunction` object as its parameter. The `explicit` keyword is used to indicate that this constructor can only be called with an explicit argument list, and not through implicit conversion. *" LLVM,ARC,322,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `MF.setAlignment(Align());` This statement sets the alignment of the machine function `MF` to the specified value ``. The `Align` function is used to create an alignment object, which is then passed to the `setAlignment` method of the `MachineFunction` class. The alignment value is typically a power of 2, and it determines the minimum alignment required for the function's stack frame." LLVM,ARC,323,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `FunctionInfo` class and the logic within the `anchor` method. However, based on the name of the method and the fact that it is a member function of the `FunctionInfo` class, it is likely that the next statement will be related to the initialization or setup of the function." LLVM,ARC,324,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `FunctionInfo` class and the logic within the `anchor` method. However, based on the name of the method and the fact that it is a member function of the `FunctionInfo` class, it is likely that the next statement will be related to the initialization or setup of the function." LLVM,ARC,325,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be the initialization of the `FunctionInfo` object with the provided `MachineFunction` object `MF`. The constructor is initializing the object's member variables with the provided values. The constructor is initializing the `ReturnStackOffsetSet` member variable to `false`, which means that the return stack offset has not been set yet. The `VarArgsFrameIndex` and `VarArgFrameBytes` member variables are being initialized to the values provided in the constructor arguments. The `ReturnStackOffset` member variable is being initialized to `-1`, which is a" LLVM,ARC,326,"The next statement of this code snippet is: return VarArgsFrameIndex;" LLVM,ARC,327,"The next statement of this code snippet is: ReturnStackOffsetSet = true;" LLVM,ARC,328,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific values of the variables and the logic of the program. However, based on the information provided, it is likely that the next statement will be a return statement, as the variable `ReturnStackOffset` is being assigned the value `value`." LLVM,ARC,329,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `FunctionInfo` class and the context in which it is being used. However, based on the name of the class and the fact that it is being instantiated, it is likely that the next statement will involve the creation of a new instance of the `FunctionInfo` class." LLVM,ARC,330,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `FunctionInfo` class and the context in which it is being used. However, based on the name of the class and the fact that it is being instantiated, it is likely that the next statement will involve the creation of a new instance of the `FunctionInfo` class." LLVM,ARC,331,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the code depends on various factors such as the input data, the specific implementation of the `MCAsmInfo` class, and the environment in which the code is executed. However, based on the name of the function `anchor`, it is likely that the next statement will be related to the creation or manipulation of an anchor or a reference point in the code. This could involve setting up a pointer or a reference to a specific location in memory, or it could involve creating a new anchor or reference point in the" LLVM,ARC,332,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the code depends on various factors such as the input data, the specific implementation of the `MCAsmInfo` class, and the environment in which the code is executed. However, based on the name of the function `anchor`, it is likely that the next statement will be related to the creation or manipulation of an anchor or a reference point in the code. This could involve setting up a pointer or a reference to a specific location in memory, or it could involve creating a new anchor or reference point in the" LLVM,ARC,333,"The next statement of this code snippet is: Data32bitsDirective = ; Data64bitsDirective = nullptr ; ZeroDirective = ; CommentString = ;" LLVM,ARC,334,"The next statement in the code snippet is: `AllowAtInName = true ;` This statement sets the `AllowAtInName` flag to `true`, which allows the use of the `@` symbol in identifiers." LLVM,ARC,335,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `OutMI.addOperand(MCOp);` This statement adds the operand `MCOp` to the `OutMI` object, which is an instance of the `MachineInstr` class. The `addOperand` method is called on `OutMI` with the `MCOp` operand as its argument." LLVM,ARC,336,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `MCInstLower` class and the `MCContext` and `AsmPrinter` classes. However, based on the names of the classes and the constructor parameters, it is likely that the next statement will be a call to the `MCInstLower` constructor, which will initialize the `Ctx` and `Printer` members of the `MCInstLower` object." LLVM,ARC,337,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `MCInstLower` class and the `MCContext` and `AsmPrinter` classes. However, based on the names of the classes and the constructor parameters, it is likely that the next statement will be a call to the `MCInstLower` constructor, which will initialize the `Ctx` and `Printer` members of the `MCInstLower` object." LLVM,ARC,338,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the `Lower` function is dependent on the specific implementation of the `MCInstLower` class and the input parameters `MI` and `OutMI`. However, based on the name of the function and the parameters, it is likely that the function is responsible for lowering the machine instruction `MI` into a lower-level representation, and storing the result in `OutMI`. The function may also perform other operations, such as updating the state of the `MCInstLower` object or performing additional processing on the" LLVM,ARC,339,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the code depends on the specific implementation of the `OutMI` and `MI` classes, as well as any external factors that may affect their behavior. However, based on the syntax and structure of the code, it is likely that the next statement after the one you provided will be an assignment statement that sets the value of a variable or property to the result of the `getOpcode()` method called on the `MI` object. For example, the next statement could be: ``` OutMI" LLVM,ARC,340,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific values of the variables and the behavior of the functions being called. However, based on the code provided, it appears that the next statement will be: `return LowerSymbolOperand(MO, MOTy, Offset);` This is because the code is currently in the `case MachineOperand::MO_RegisterMask` block, and the next statement after the `switch` statement is the `return` statement. The `LowerSymbolOperand` function is called with the `MO`, `" LLVM,ARC,341,"The next statement after the `switch` block will be the statement following the `switch` block, which is: `return MCOperand::createReg(MO.getReg());`" LLVM,ARC,342,"The next statement after the `switch` block is `assert(Symbol && ""Symbol not found"");`. This statement checks if the `Symbol` variable is not null and if it is, it prints an error message indicating that the symbol was not found. The `llvm_unreachable` function is used to indicate that the default case should never be reached, and the `assert` statement is used to check if the `Symbol` variable is null. If the `Symbol` variable is null, the `assert` statement will trigger an error." LLVM,ARC,343,"The next statement after the code snippet you provided is: `return MAI;` This statement is a return statement that returns the value of `MAI`, which is a `MachineInstrAnalysis` object. The `MachineInstrAnalysis` object is being used to analyze the machine code instructions in the program, and the `return` statement is returning the result of the analysis." LLVM,ARC,344,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `TargetRegistry` class and the `create` functions. However, based on the naming conventions and the context of the code, it is likely that the next statement will be a call to `TargetRegistry::RegisterMCAsmInfo`, passing in the `TheTarget` object and a function that creates an instance of the `MCAsmInfo` class. Here is an example of what the next statement might look like: ``` TargetRegistry::" LLVM,ARC,345,"The next statement after the code snippet you provided is: `return X;` This statement returns the value of `X`, which is a pointer to a `MCRegisterInfo` object, from the function." LLVM,ARC,346,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be a call to the `MCAsmInfo` constructor, which is a member function of the `MCAsmInfo` class. The constructor is responsible for initializing the object and preparing it for use. Here is an example of what the next statement might look like: ``` MCAsmInfo * MAI = new MCAsmInfo ( TT ) ; MAI->MCAsmInfo ( TT ) ; ``` In this example, the `MCAsmInfo` constructor is called" LLVM,ARC,347,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `TargetStreamer` class and the `MCStreamer` class. However, based on the names of the classes and the fact that `TargetStreamer` is derived from `MCTargetStreamer`, it is likely that the next statement will be a call to the constructor of the `MCTargetStreamer` class, passing in the `MCStreamer` object `S` as an argument. Here is an example of what the next statement might look like: ```" LLVM,ARC,348,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `TargetStreamer` class and the `MCStreamer` class. However, based on the names of the classes and the fact that `TargetStreamer` is derived from `MCTargetStreamer`, it is likely that the next statement will be a call to the constructor of the `MCTargetStreamer` class, passing in the `MCStreamer` object `S` as an argument. Here is an example of what the next statement might look like: ```" LLVM,ARC,349,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return MAI;` Explanation: The code snippet creates a new `MCAsmInfo` object and initializes it with the `TT` parameter. It then creates a `MCCFIInstruction` object using the `createDefCfa` method, passing in `nullptr` as the first argument and `` and `` as the second and third arguments, respectively. The `addInitialFrameState` method is then called on the `MAI` object, passing in the `M" LLVM,ARC,350,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be: `MAI->addInitialFrameState(Inst);` This is because the previous statement, `MCCFIInstruction Inst = MCCFIInstruction::createDefCfa(nullptr, , );`, creates a new `MCCFIInstruction` object and assigns it to the variable `Inst`. The next statement, `MAI->addInitialFrameState(Inst);`, adds the `MCCFIInstruction` object to the initial frame state of the machine code." LLVM,ARC,351,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return new InstPrinter ( MAI , MII , MRI ) ;` This statement creates a new instance of the `InstPrinter` class, passing in the `MAI`, `MII`, and `MRI` objects as arguments. The `InstPrinter` class is a subclass of `MCInstPrinter`, and it is responsible for printing instructions in a specific format. The `` template parameter is used to specify the instruction set architecture (ISA) for which the" LLVM,ARC,352,"The next statement of this code snippet is: return new MCInstPrinter(T, SyntaxVariant, MAI, MII, MRI);" LLVM,ARC,353,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the program depends on the specific implementation of the `MCInstrInfo` class and the state of the program at runtime. However, based on the syntax and the fact that the `MCInstrInfo` class is being instantiated using the `new` operator, it is likely that the next statement will be a call to the constructor of the `MCInstrInfo` class, which will initialize the object and prepare it for use. It is also possible that the next statement will be a call to" LLVM,ARC,354,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the code depends on the specific implementation of the `MCRegisterInfo` class and the context in which the code is executed. However, based on the syntax and the fact that the `MCRegisterInfo` class is being instantiated using the `new` operator, it is likely that the next statement will involve the creation of a new instance of the `MCRegisterInfo` class and the assignment of that instance to a variable. For example, the next statement could be: ``` MCRegisterInfo *" LLVM,ARC,355,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return createMCSubtargetInfoImpl ( TT , CPU , FS ) ;` This statement calls the `createMCSubtargetInfoImpl` function with the `TT`, `CPU`, and `FS` arguments, and returns the result of that function call." LLVM,ARC,356,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be the creation of a new instance of the `TargetStreamer` class, which is a subclass of `MCTargetStreamer`. The `createTargetAsmStreamer` function takes several arguments, including a reference to a `MCStreamer` object, a reference to a `formatted_raw_ostream` object, a pointer to a `MCInstPrinter` object, and a boolean value indicating whether or not to use verbose assembly output. The function creates a new instance of the `TargetStreamer` class by calling its constructor with the provided" LLVM,ARC,357,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `TargetRegistry` class and the `RegisterMCRegInfo`, `RegisterMCSubtargetInfo`, and `RegisterMCInstPrinter` methods. However, based on the names of the methods and the fact that they are all related to registering information for a target, it is likely that the next statement will involve registering additional information for the target, such as registering the target's instruction set architecture (ISA) or its memory management unit (MMU)." LLVM,ARC,358,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `TargetRegistry` class and the `RegisterMCAsmInfoFn` function. However, based on the context and the names of the functions being called, it is likely that the next statement will be a call to `TargetRegistry::RegisterMCAsmInfo` to register the assembly information for the target. Here is a possible next statement: ``` TargetRegistry::RegisterMCAsmInfo(TheTarget, create" LLVM,ARC,359,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific values of the variables and the behavior of the functions being called. However, based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the next statement will be: Ldst.addOperand(MachineOperand::CreateReg(NewBase, true)); This is because the code snippet is setting the description of the Ldst object using the getInstrInfo() function, and then adding a register operand to the Ldst object using the CreateReg() function. The CreateReg() function takes two arguments" LLVM,ARC,360,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific values of the variables and the behavior of the functions being called. However, based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the next statement will be: Ldst.setDesc(AST->getInstrInfo()->get(NewOpcode)); This is because the previous line of code, Ldst.RemoveOperand(BasePos), removes the operand at position BasePos from the Ldst instruction, and the next line of code, Ldst.setDesc(AST->getInstr" LLVM,ARC,361,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `Result = Add . getNextNode ( ) ;` This statement assigns the result of `Add . getNextNode ( )` to the variable `Result`. The `getNextNode ( )` method is called on the `Add` object, which is a `MachineInstr` object. This method returns the next node in the instruction sequence, which is then assigned to `Result`." LLVM,ARC,362,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be: `LLVM_DEBUG(dbgs() << ""Found a load/store instruction that can be optimized\n"");` This is because the code is checking if the load/store instruction can be optimized by checking if the offset is a constant and if the instruction can be joined with other instructions. If the instruction can be optimized, the code will print a debug message indicating that a load/store instruction has been found that can be optimized." LLVM,ARC,363,"The next statement of the code snippet is: `Result = nullptr;` Explanation: The code snippet is part of a function that is trying to find a specific sequence of instructions in a machine code program. The function is searching for a load instruction (`Ldst`) followed by an add instruction (`Add`), and then checking if there are any uses of the load or add instructions that are not dominated by the other instruction. If there are no such uses, the function returns `nullptr`. Otherwise, it sets `Result` to either `First` (the first instruction in the sequence)" LLVM,ARC,364,"The next statement of the code snippet is: Result = nullptr;" LLVM,ARC,365,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific values of the variables and the implementation of the functions involved. However, based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the next statement will be a call to the `addOperand` method of the `Ldst` object, passing in a `MachineOperand` object created using the `CreateReg` function with the `NewBase` and `true` arguments." LLVM,ARC,366,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `if (MBB->empty()) {` This is because the code checks if the `MBB` object is empty, and if it is, it executes the code inside the `if` statement." LLVM,ARC,367,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet without knowing the specific implementation of the `MachineInstr` class and the `getOperand` and `getReg` methods. However, based on the names of the methods and the context of the code, it appears that the code is checking whether a specific register is used before a load or store instruction. The `getOperand` method is called on the `Add` instruction, which is passed as an argument to the `noUseOfAddBeforeLoadOrStore` method. The `getOperand` method returns a register, which is then" LLVM,ARC,368,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `if (DUMP_AFTER()) MF.dump();` This is because the `for` loop that iterates over the basic blocks of the machine function `MF` has completed, and the `if` statement that checks whether the `DUMP_AFTER()` macro is defined is now being evaluated. If the macro is defined, the `MF.dump()` method will be called to dump the machine function to the console." LLVM,ARC,369,The next statement after the `for` loop is `if ( DUMP_AFTER ( ) ) MF . dump ( ) ;`. LLVM,ARC,370,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be a conditional statement, specifically an `if` statement. The code is checking the value of `MoveTo` and `Uses` to determine whether the instructions can be joined and whether the uses of the instructions can be fixed. If the conditions are not met, the code will continue to the next iteration of the loop." LLVM,ARC,371,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be the following: `LLVM_DEBUG(dbgs() << << *First << << *Last << );` This statement is a debug print statement that prints the contents of the `First` and `Last` pointers, which are both of type `MachineInstr*`. The `` placeholders are likely to be replaced with string literals that provide additional context for the debug print statement." LLVM,ARC,372,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `if ( MI -> isDebugValue ( ) ) continue ;` This statement checks if the current instruction is a debug value, and if so, it continues to the next instruction without executing the rest of the code in the loop." LLVM,ARC,373,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `Amount = Sign * MI . getOperand ( ) . getImm ( ) ;` This statement assigns the value of `Sign` (which is either 1 or -1) multiplied by the immediate value of the operand at index `` to the variable `Amount`. The `getImm()` method is used to retrieve the immediate value of the operand." LLVM,ARC,374,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet without knowing the specific implementation of the `MachineFunctionPass` class and the `OptAddrMode` function. However, based on the name of the function and the class, it is likely that the next statement will be related to addressing modes for a machine function. Here are a few possibilities for what the next statement could be: 1. A call to a function that sets the addressing mode for a specific instruction in the machine function. 2. A loop that iterates over the instructions in the machine function and sets the addressing mode" LLVM,ARC,375,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet without knowing the specific implementation of the `MachineFunctionPass` class and the `OptAddrMode` function. However, based on the name of the function and the class, it is likely that the next statement will be related to addressing modes for a machine function. Here are a few possibilities for what the next statement could be: 1. A call to a function that sets the addressing mode for a specific instruction in the machine function. 2. A loop that iterates over the instructions in the machine function and sets the addressing mode" LLVM,ARC,376,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `if (isLoadStoreThatCanHandleDisplacement(AII, *MI, -NewOffset)) continue;` This statement checks if the load or store instruction can handle the displacement of -NewOffset. If it can, the code continues to the next iteration of the loop. If it cannot, the code executes the statements in the else block." LLVM,ARC,377,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be the start of the second `for` loop, which is used to iterate over the explicit operands of the `Ldst` instruction. The loop will check whether each operand is a register and a use, and if so, it will retrieve the definition of the operand using `getVRegDef` and check whether it dominates the `To` instruction using `dominates`. If any of these checks fail, the function will return `false`." LLVM,ARC,378,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `Result = First;` The code is checking if the first instruction is the `Add` instruction, and if so, it checks if there are any uses of `Add` before the load or store instruction. If there are no such uses, it sets `Result` to the last instruction. Otherwise, it checks if the load or store instruction can be hoisted to the `Add` instruction. If it can, it sets `Result` to the first instruction. If none of these conditions are met, it sets `Result` to the first instruction." LLVM,ARC,379,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `for (MachineInstr &MI : MRI->use_nodbg_instructions(BaseReg)) {` This line is a loop that iterates over the instructions that use the base register, which is the register that contains the base address of the load or store instruction. The loop body checks each instruction to see if it is the load or store instruction itself, or if it is an instruction that dominates the load or store instruction. If an instruction dominates the load or store instruction, it is added to the `UsesAfterL" LLVM,ARC,380,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `if (MI->isDebugValue()) continue;`" LLVM,ARC,381,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the program depends on the specific inputs and the implementation of the functions called. However, based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the program is modifying the operands of a machine instruction to change its addressing mode. The `MachineInstr` class is likely a class that represents a machine instruction, and the `changeToAddrMode` function is modifying the operands of the instruction to change its addressing mode. The function takes several parameters: * `Ldst`: A reference to a" LLVM,ARC,382,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be: Ldst.setDesc(AST->getInstrInfo()->get(NewOpcode)); This is because the previous statement, Ldst.RemoveOperand(BasePos), has removed the operand at position BasePos from the instruction, and the next statement is likely to be setting the description of the instruction using the new opcode." LLVM,ARC,383,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be a return statement, as the function is expected to return a value of type `FunctionPass *`. The return statement is likely to be `return new OptAddrMode ( ) ;`, which creates a new instance of the `OptAddrMode` class and returns it as the result of the function." LLVM,ARC,384,The next statement after the `if` block is `User = & * MBB -> rbegin ( ) ;`. LLVM,ARC,385,"Based on the code snippet provided, it is difficult to predict the next statement with certainty. However, based on the context and the patterns in the code, it is likely that the next statement will be something like: `NewOffset += MO.getImm();` This is because the code is checking if the operand is an immediate value and then adding its value to the `NewOffset` variable. The `getImm()` method is likely to return the immediate value of the operand, which will be added to `NewOffset`. It is important to note that this is just a prediction" LLVM,ARC,386,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `isValidIncrementOffset` function and the `getBaseAndOffsetPosition` method. However, based on the context and the names of the variables involved, it is likely that the next statement will be related to updating the offset position of the machine instruction. The `isValidIncrementOffset` function appears to check whether the given offset is valid for the current instruction, and the `` expression is likely a string literal that represents the name of the instruction. The `" LLVM,ARC,387,"The next statement after the code snippet you provided is likely to be a call to the `getAnalysisUsage` method of the `MachineFunctionPass` class, which is a subclass of the `FunctionPass` class. The `getAnalysisUsage` method is used to retrieve the analysis usage information for a function pass, which specifies the types of analyses that the pass requires and the types of analyses that it provides. Here is an example of how the `getAnalysisUsage` method might be used in the context of the code snippet you provided: ``` MachineFunctionPass" LLVM,ARC,388,"The next statement after the code snippet you provided is likely to be a call to the `getAnalysisUsage` method of the `MachineFunctionPass` class, which is a subclass of the `FunctionPass` class. The `getAnalysisUsage` method is used to retrieve the analysis usage information for a function pass, which specifies the types of analyses that the pass requires and the types of analyses that it provides. Here is an example of how the `getAnalysisUsage` method might be used in the context of the code snippet you provided: ``` MachineFunctionPass" LLVM,ARC,389,"The next statement of this code snippet is: return OPTADDRMODE_DESC;" LLVM,ARC,390,"Based on the code snippet you provided, it appears to be a switch statement in a programming language. The switch statement is checking the value of `MI.getOpcode()` and executing different blocks of code based on the value. In the first case, the code is checking if the value of `MI.getOpcode()` is ``. If it is, the code sets the variable `Sign` to `-`. The `LLVM_FALLTHROUGH` macro is then used to fall through to the next case. In the second case" LLVM,ARC,391,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `MO` object and the value of the `Disp` variable. However, based on the code snippet you provided, it appears that the next statement will be an assignment to the `Offset` variable. The `getImm()` method is called on the `MO` object, which returns an integer value. This value is then added to the `Disp` variable and assigned to the `Offset` variable. So, the next statement will likely be something like:" LLVM,ARC,392,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be a comparison of the `Off` variable with the value of the `NUM_LIT` template parameter. In C++, the `<` operator is used for comparison, and the `isUInt` function is used to check if a value is an unsigned integer. Therefore, the next statement is likely to be a comparison of the `Off` variable with the value of the `NUM_LIT` template parameter, which is expected to be an unsigned integer. For example, if the `NUM_LIT` template parameter is set to 1" LLVM,ARC,393,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be a comparison of the `Off` variable with the value of the `NUM_LIT` template parameter. In C++, the `<` operator is used for comparison, and the `isUInt` function is used to check if a value is an unsigned integer. Therefore, the next statement is likely to be a comparison of the `Off` variable with the value of the `NUM_LIT` template parameter, which is expected to be an unsigned integer. For example, if the `NUM_LIT` template parameter is set to 1" LLVM,ARC,394,"The next statement of this code snippet is: return isInt < > ( Off );" LLVM,ARC,395,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet without knowing the specific implementation of the `MachineInstr` class and the `noUseOfAddBeforeLoadOrStore` method. However, based on the name of the method, it appears to be checking whether there is any use of the `Add` instruction before a load or store instruction. Given that the `Add` instruction is a binary instruction that performs addition, it is possible that the method is checking whether the result of the addition is used as an address for a load or store operation. If this is the case, the next statement of the" LLVM,ARC,396,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return dominatesAllUsesOf(Ldst, R, MDT, MRI);` This statement is a function call that checks if the instruction `Ldst` dominates all uses of the register `R` in the basic block. The function `dominatesAllUsesOf` takes four arguments: the instruction `Ldst`, the register `R`, the machine dominance tree `MDT`, and the machine register info `MRI`. It returns a boolean value indicating whether the instruction `Ldst` dominates all uses of the register `" LLVM,ARC,397,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `if (Res) {`" LLVM,ARC,398,"The next statement after the code snippet you provided is: `MI = std::prev(Res->getIterator());` This statement is executed if the `tryToCombine` function returns a non-null pointer, which means that the instruction was successfully combined with another instruction. The `std::prev` function is used to get the iterator for the previous instruction in the list, which is then assigned to `MI`." LLVM,ARC,399,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `bool OptAddrMode :: runOnMachineFunction ( MachineFunction & MF ) { if ( skipFunction ( MF . getFunction ( ) ) ) return false ; AST = & MF . getSubtarget < Subtarget > ( ) ; AII = AST -> getInstrInfo ( ) ; MRI = & MF . getRegInfo ( ) ;` This statement is a function definition for a class called `OptAddr" LLVM,ARC,400,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `for (auto &MBB : MF) Changed |= processBasicBlock(MBB);` This line is a `for` loop that iterates over the basic blocks in the machine function `MF`. The loop variable `MBB` is a reference to each basic block in the function, and the loop body calls the `processBasicBlock` function on each block. The `|=` operator is used to update the `Changed` variable with the result of the `processBasicBlock` function." LLVM,ARC,401,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the implementation of the `MF` object and the `needsFrameMoves()` method. However, based on the syntax and the fact that the method is called on the `MF` object, it is likely that the next statement will be a call to the `needsFrameMoves()` method on the `MF` object." LLVM,ARC,402,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `Offset = StackSize + Offset;` This line of code is part of an if-else statement that checks whether the frame index is greater than or equal to a certain value. If the frame index is greater than or equal to that value, then the offset is set to the stack size plus the offset. Otherwise, the offset is left unchanged. The purpose of this code is to calculate the offset of a frame index in a machine function. The offset is used to access the frame index in the machine function's frame info. The code first" LLVM,ARC,403,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific values of the variables and the behavior of the functions being called. However, based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the next statement will be a call to the `BuildMI` function with the following arguments: * `MBB`: The current basic block. * `II`: The current instruction. * `dl`: The debug location. * `TII`: The target instruction information. * `MI`: The machine instruction. * `Reg`: The register. * `" LLVM,ARC,404,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it appears to be part of a larger program and the context is not provided. However, based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the next statement will be a call to the `ChangeToRegister` method of the `MachineOperand` class, passing in the frame register and the offset as arguments. The `ChangeToRegister` method is used to change the operand to a register operand, and the frame register is the register that holds the base address of the stack frame. The offset is the offset from the base address of" LLVM,ARC,405,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the `getFrameRegister` method depends on the specific implementation of the `RegisterInfo` class and the `MachineFunction` class. However, based on the name of the method and the fact that it is a member function of the `RegisterInfo` class, it is likely that the method returns a register that is used as a frame pointer in the machine function. The `MachineFunction` class is a part of the LLVM compiler infrastructure and represents a function in the machine code level. The `RegisterInfo" LLVM,ARC,406,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the code depends on the specific implementation of the `getFrameLowering` function and the value of the `MF` variable. However, based on the naming conventions used in the code, it is likely that the next statement will involve the `TFI` variable, which is a pointer to a `FrameLowering` object. The code may use this pointer to access the properties or methods of the `FrameLowering` object, or it may pass the pointer as an argument to another function." LLVM,ARC,407,"The code snippet you provided is not complete, so it's difficult to determine the next statement. However, based on the code you provided, it appears that the next statement will be a `case` statement, possibly with a `break` statement after it." LLVM,ARC,408,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be the initialization of the `ST` member variable with the `ST` parameter passed to the constructor. Here's a breakdown of the code snippet: * `ISA_LIT` is a macro that expands to a string literal representing the name of the instruction set architecture (ISA) being targeted. * `RegisterInfo` is a class that represents information about a register in the ISA. * `RegisterInfo` is a constructor that initializes a new instance of the `RegisterInfo` class. * `ST" LLVM,ARC,409,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be the initialization of the `ST` member variable with the `ST` parameter passed to the constructor. Here's a breakdown of the code snippet: * `ISA_LIT` is a macro that expands to a string literal representing the name of the instruction set architecture (ISA) being targeted. * `RegisterInfo` is a class that represents information about a register in the ISA. * `RegisterInfo` is a constructor that initializes a new instance of the `RegisterInfo` class. * `ST" LLVM,ARC,410,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `MI.getOperand(FIOperandNum).ChangeToRegister(FrameReg, false);` This statement is changing the operand at index `FIOperandNum` of the `MachineInstr` object `MI` to a register operand, using the `FrameReg` register. The `false` argument indicates that the operand should not be marked as a kill." LLVM,ARC,411,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be a `case` statement, as it is part of a `switch` block. The `switch` block is checking the value of `MI.getOpcode()`, and the next `case` statement will be executed based on the value of `MI.getOpcode()`." LLVM,ARC,412,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `case : assert ( ( Offset % == ) && ) ;` This is a `case` statement in a `switch` block, which checks the value of `MI.getOpcode()` and executes the corresponding code block. In this case, the code block checks that `Offset` is a multiple of a certain value and that a specific string literal is not empty. If these conditions are not met, the code will assert and terminate" LLVM,ARC,413,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `RegisterInfo :: RegisterInfo ( ) : GenRegisterInfo ( ) {` This is a constructor for the `RegisterInfo` class, which is a subclass of `GenRegisterInfo`. The constructor initializes the `RegisterInfo` object with the specified string literal." LLVM,ARC,414,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `RegisterInfo :: RegisterInfo ( ) : GenRegisterInfo ( ) {` This is a constructor for the `RegisterInfo` class, which is a subclass of `GenRegisterInfo`. The constructor initializes the `RegisterInfo` object with the specified string literal." LLVM,ARC,415,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it appears to be a part of a larger function and the context is not provided. However, based on the code snippet provided, it appears that the next statement will be a call to the `getOperand` method of the `MI` object, passing in the value of `FIOperandNum + ` as the argument. This will return an operand object, which will then have its `getImm` method called to retrieve the immediate value associated with the operand. The value of `Offset` will" LLVM,ARC,416,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet without knowing the specific implementation of the `getCalleeSavedRegs` function and the context in which it is being called. However, based on the name of the function and the parameters it takes, it is likely that it returns a list of registers that are saved by the callee (i.e., the function being called) before it returns. In this case, the `getCalleeSavedRegs` function is being called on an object of type `RegisterInfo`, which is likely a class that represents a register in the" LLVM,ARC,417,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet without knowing the specific implementation of the `getCalleeSavedRegs` function and the context in which it is being called. However, based on the name of the function and the parameters it takes, it is likely that it returns a list of registers that are saved by the callee (i.e., the function being called) before it returns. In this case, the `getCalleeSavedRegs` function is being called on an object of type `RegisterInfo`, which is likely a class that represents a register in the" LLVM,ARC,418,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `getCallPreservedMask` method and the values of the `CSR__RegMask` variable. However, based on the name of the method and the fact that it is returning a pointer to a `uint32_t` value, it is likely that the next statement of this code snippet will be a dereference of the pointer, such as `*CSR__RegMask`. This would" LLVM,ARC,419,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `getCallPreservedMask` method and the values of the `CSR__RegMask` variable. However, based on the name of the method and the fact that it is returning a pointer to a `uint32_t` value, it is likely that the next statement of this code snippet will be a dereference of the pointer, such as `*CSR__RegMask`. This would" LLVM,ARC,420,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `getFrameLowering` method and the `MachineFunction` class. However, based on the name of the method and the class, it is likely that the next statement will retrieve the frame register from the `MachineFunction` object using the `getFrameRegister` method. Here is a possible next statement: ``` Register frameRegister = MF.getFrameRegister(); ``` This statement retrieves the frame register from the `MachineFunction` object and stores it in the `" LLVM,ARC,421,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it appears to be a fragment of a larger program and the context is not provided. However, based on the syntax and the fact that the code is setting values using the `Reserved.set()` method, it is possible that the next statement could be another call to `Reserved.set()` to set another value. Alternatively, it is possible that the next statement could be a call to a different method or function, or it could be a statement that uses the values that have been set using `Reserved.set()`." LLVM,ARC,422,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet without knowing the context and the specific implementation of the `MF` class. However, based on the code provided, it appears that the next statement will be a call to the `getMMI` method of the `MF` class, which returns an object that has a `hasDebugInfo` method. The `hasDebugInfo` method is then called on the returned object, and its return value is used in a logical OR operation with the result of the `needsUnwindTableEntry` method called on the `MF` class." LLVM,ARC,423,"This code snippet is part of a larger function that appears to be generating machine code for a processor. The code is using a number of macros and functions that are not defined in the snippet, so it is difficult to provide a definitive answer. However, based on the context and the names of the functions and macros used, it appears that the code is generating machine code for a load or store instruction. The first part of the code snippet is checking the offset of the memory operand and adjusting the offset and the kill state accordingly. The second part of the code snippet is generating the machine code for the load" LLVM,ARC,424,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return true;` This statement is the last statement in the `requiresRegisterScavenging` function, and it returns the value `true` to indicate that the register scavenging is required for the current machine function." LLVM,ARC,425,"The next statement after the given code snippet is: `return true;` The `trackLivenessAfterRegAlloc` function returns a boolean value indicating whether the liveness of registers should be tracked after register allocation. The function returns `true` by default, which means that the liveness of registers will be tracked after register allocation." LLVM,ARC,426,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the code depends on the specific implementation of the `trackLivenessAfterRegAlloc` method and the data stored in the `MachineFunction` object. However, based on the name of the method and the fact that it is declared as a `const` method, it is likely that the method does not modify the state of the `MachineFunction` object and returns a value indicating whether or not liveness tracking should be performed after register allocation. Therefore, the next statement of this code snippet is likely" LLVM,ARC,427,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return true;` This statement is the last statement in the `useFPForScavengingIndex` function, and it returns the value `true` to indicate that the function should use the floating-point register for scavenging the index." LLVM,ARC,428,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be the initialization of the `InstrInfo` object, which is a member of the `Subtarget` class. The `InstrInfo` object is being initialized with the `Subtarget` object itself as an argument, which suggests that it is being used to initialize the `InstrInfo` object with information about the instruction set architecture (ISA) of the target machine. Here is the predicted next statement of the code snippet: ``` InstrInfo.init(this); ``` This statement initializes the `InstrInfo` object with" LLVM,ARC,429,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be the initialization of the `InstrInfo` object, which is a member of the `Subtarget` class. The `InstrInfo` object is being initialized with the `Subtarget` object itself as an argument, which suggests that it is being used to initialize the `InstrInfo` object with information about the instruction set architecture (ISA) of the target machine. Here is the predicted next statement of the code snippet: ``` InstrInfo.init(this); ``` This statement initializes the `InstrInfo` object with" LLVM,ARC,430,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be the initialization of the `FrameLowering` and `TLInfo` objects, which are being passed a reference to the current `Subtarget` object as an argument. Here's a breakdown of the code snippet: * `Subtarget` is a class that inherits from `GenSubtargetInfo` and `FrameLowering`. * `GenSubtargetInfo` is a class that provides information about the target architecture. * `FrameLowering` is a class that provides information about the frame layout. * `TLInfo`" LLVM,ARC,431,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be the initialization of the `FrameLowering` and `TLInfo` objects, which are being passed a reference to the current `Subtarget` object as an argument. Here's a breakdown of the code snippet: * `Subtarget` is a class that inherits from `GenSubtargetInfo` and `FrameLowering`. * `GenSubtargetInfo` is a class that provides information about the target architecture. * `FrameLowering` is a class that provides information about the frame layout. * `TLInfo`" LLVM,ARC,432,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `Subtarget` class and the `anchor` method. However, based on the name of the method and the fact that it is declared as a member of the `Subtarget` class, it is likely that the next statement will be a call to a method that is specific to the `Subtarget` class." LLVM,ARC,433,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `Subtarget` class and the `anchor` method. However, based on the name of the method and the fact that it is declared as a member of the `Subtarget` class, it is likely that the next statement will be a call to a method that is specific to the `Subtarget` class." LLVM,ARC,434,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be the initialization of the `FrameLowering` and `TLInfo` objects, which are being passed as arguments to the constructor of the `Subtarget` class. The `FrameLowering` object is being initialized with the `this` pointer, which refers to the current `Subtarget` object being constructed. The `TLInfo` object is being initialized with the `TM` object, which is a `TargetMachine` object, and the `this` pointer, which refers to the current `Subtarget` object being constructed. Therefore, the" LLVM,ARC,435,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be the initialization of the `FrameLowering` and `TLInfo` objects, which are being passed as arguments to the constructor of the `Subtarget` class. The `FrameLowering` object is being initialized with the `this` pointer, which refers to the current `Subtarget` object being constructed. The `TLInfo` object is being initialized with the `TM` object, which is a `TargetMachine` object, and the `this` pointer, which refers to the current `Subtarget` object being constructed. Therefore, the" LLVM,ARC,436,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `getFrameLowering` method in the `ISA_LIT` class. However, based on the name of the method and the fact that it is marked as `const`, it is likely that the method returns a reference to a `FrameLowering` object that is associated with the `ISA_LIT` instance." LLVM,ARC,437,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `getInstrInfo` method in the derived class. However, based on the name of the method and the fact that it is marked as `override`, it is likely that the method returns an object of type `InstrInfo` that contains information about the instruction." LLVM,ARC,438,"The next statement of this code snippet is: return &InstrInfo.getRegisterInfo();" LLVM,ARC,439,"The next statement of this code snippet is: return &TSInfo;" LLVM,ARC,440,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `getTargetLowering` method in the derived class. However, based on the name of the method and the fact that it is declared as `const`, it is likely that the method returns a pointer to an object of type `TargetLowering` that is associated with the current object." LLVM,ARC,441,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the context in which the code is being executed. However, based on the syntax and the fact that the code is returning a reference to a variable named `TLInfo`, it is likely that the next statement will be a statement that uses or manipulates the value of `TLInfo`." LLVM,ARC,442,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return Xnorm;` This statement returns the value of the `Xnorm` member variable, which is a `bool` indicating whether the vector has a norm or not." LLVM,ARC,443,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `RegisterTarget` function and the `getTheTarget` function. However, based on the syntax and the fact that the `RegisterTarget` function is being called with three arguments, it is likely that the next statement will be a call to the `RegisterTarget` function with the same arguments as the previous call, but with a different target. It is also possible that the next statement will be a call to a different function, or a statement that performs some" LLVM,ARC,444,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `TheTarget.setTriple(Triple::normalize(ISA_LIT));` This statement sets the triple of the `TheTarget` object to the normalized form of the `ISA_LIT` string. The `normalize()` function is used to convert the string to a canonical form, which is necessary for the `setTriple()` method to work correctly." LLVM,ARC,445,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `RM` object and the `getValueOr` method. However, based on the syntax and the fact that the method is called with a `Reloc` object, it is likely that the next statement will be a return statement that returns the value of the `Reloc` object." LLVM,ARC,446,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the code is incomplete and the next statement depends on the implementation of the `PassConfig` class. However, based on the name of the method and the fact that it is a member function of the `PassConfig` class, it is likely that the next statement will be related to the configuration of a pass in a compiler or optimizer." LLVM,ARC,447,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be the initialization of the `Subtarget` object, which is a member of the `TargetMachine` class. The `Subtarget` object is constructed with the `TT`, `CPU`, `FS`, and `this` parameters, where `TT` is a `Triple` object, `CPU` is a string representing the CPU name, `FS` is a string representing the feature set, and `this` is a pointer to the `TargetMachine` object being constructed. The `Subtarget` object is used to represent the target machine'" LLVM,ARC,448,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `initAsmInfo();`" LLVM,ARC,449,"The next statement of this code snippet is: return CM.orElse(new CodeModel.Model());" LLVM,ARC,450,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific values of the variables and the logic of the program. However, based on the syntax and the fact that the `return` statement is inside an `if` block, it is likely that the next statement after this code snippet will be the statement that follows the `if` block. In other words, if the condition `CM` is true, the code will return the value of `*CM`, and if the condition is false, the code will continue executing the next statement after the `if` block" LLVM,ARC,451,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be a call to the `LLVMInitializeTargetInfo` function, which initializes the target information for the specified ISA. This function is typically called by the `LLVMInitializeTarget` function, which is responsible for initializing the target information for all supported ISAs." LLVM,ARC,452,"The next statement after the code snippet you provided is likely to be the return statement of the function that contains the code snippet. In the code snippet, the `TargetTransformInfo` object is being constructed using the `TTIImpl` class, which is a subclass of `TargetTransformInfo`. The `TTIImpl` class is being constructed with the `this` pointer and the `F` parameter. The `TargetTransformInfo` object is then being returned from the function. Therefore, the next statement after the code snippet is likely to be the return statement of the function, which will return" LLVM,ARC,453,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the `addInstSelector` method is not specified. However, based on the name of the method and the fact that it is a member of the `PassConfig` class, it is likely that this method is used to add an instruction selector to the pass configuration. Without more information about the specific implementation of the `PassConfig` class and the `addInstSelector` method, it is not possible to provide a more detailed prediction of the next statement of this code snippet." LLVM,ARC,454,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the `addPreEmitPass` method is not specified. However, based on the name of the method and the fact that it is a member of the `PassConfig` class, it is likely that this method is used to add a pre-emit pass to a pass configuration. A pre-emit pass is a pass that is executed before the emitter pass, which is responsible for generating the final output of the compiler. Pre-emit passes are typically used to perform tasks such as code optimization, dead code" LLVM,ARC,455,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the behavior of the `addPreEmitPass` method is not specified. However, based on the name of the method and the fact that it is a member of the `PassConfig` class, it is likely that this method is used to add a pre-emit pass to a pass configuration. A pre-emit pass is a pass that is executed before the emitter pass, which is responsible for generating the final output of the compiler. Pre-emit passes are typically used to perform tasks such as code optimization, dead code" LLVM,ARC,456,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `PassConfig` class and the `TargetPassConfig` class. However, based on the names of the classes and the parameters passed to the constructor, it is likely that the next statement will be a call to the `TargetPassConfig` constructor, which will initialize the `TargetPassConfig` object with the `TargetMachine` and `PassManagerBase` objects passed as parameters. Here is an example of what the next statement might look like: ``` TargetPassConfig(TM," LLVM,ARC,457,"It is difficult to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `PassConfig` class and the `TargetPassConfig` class. However, based on the names of the classes and the parameters passed to the constructor, it is likely that the next statement will be a call to the `TargetPassConfig` constructor, which will initialize the `TargetPassConfig` object with the `TargetMachine` and `PassManagerBase` objects passed as parameters. Here is an example of what the next statement might look like: ``` TargetPassConfig(TM," LLVM,ARC,458,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `initAsmInfo();`" LLVM,ARC,459,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the implementation of the `PassConfig` class and the `ISA_LIT` template parameter. However, based on the syntax and the fact that the `PassConfig` class is being instantiated with the `ISA_LIT` template parameter, it is likely that the next statement will be a constructor call to the `PassConfig` class, passing in the current object and the `PM` object as arguments." LLVM,ARC,460,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return new PassConfig ( * this , PM ) ;` This statement creates a new instance of the `PassConfig` class, passing in the current `TargetMachine` object (`*this`) and the `PassManagerBase` object (`PM`) as arguments. The `PassConfig` constructor is called with these arguments, and the resulting `PassConfig` object is returned from the `createPassConfig` method." LLVM,ARC,461,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be the return statement, which will return the `TargetLoweringObjectFile` object that was created in the previous line. Here's the complete code snippet with the return statement added: ``` TargetLoweringObjectFile * getObjFileLowering ( ) const override { TargetLoweringObjectFile *objFile = new TargetLoweringObjectFile(); objFile->setTargetTriple(getTargetTriple()); objFile->setTargetArch(getTargetArch()); objFile->setTargetOS(getTargetOS" LLVM,ARC,462,"The next statement of this code snippet is: `return * RM;` This statement returns the value of the `RM` optional, which is a `Reloc::Model`. If the optional does not have a value, the `return` statement will not be executed, and the function will return the default value of `Reloc::Static`." LLVM,ARC,463,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `getSubtargetImpl` method in the subclass of `TargetLowering` that is being used. However, based on the name of the method and the fact that it is declared as `const`, it is likely that the method returns a pointer to a `Subtarget` object that is associated with the `Function` object passed as an argument. The `Subtarget` object may contain information about the target architecture and the specific subtarget (e.g., CPU model) that the" LLVM,ARC,464,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the specific implementation of the `getSubtargetImpl` method in the subclass of `TargetLowering` that is being used. However, based on the name of the method and the fact that it is declared as `const`, it is likely that the method returns a pointer to a `Subtarget` object that is associated with the `Function` object passed as an argument. The `Subtarget` object may contain information about the target architecture and the specific subtarget (e.g., CPU model) that the" LLVM,ARC,465,"The next statement after the code snippet you provided is likely to be the return statement of the function that contains the code snippet. In the code snippet, the `TargetTransformInfo` object is being constructed using the `TTIImpl` class, which is a subclass of `TargetTransformInfo`. The `TTIImpl` class is being constructed with the `this` pointer and the `F` parameter. The `TargetTransformInfo` object is then being returned from the function. Therefore, the next statement after the code snippet is likely to be the return statement of the function, which will return" LLVM,ARC,466,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be the initialization of the `LLVMInitializeTarget` function, which is a function that is defined in the LLVM library. The function is declared as `LLVM_EXTERNAL_VISIBILITY`, which means that it is defined in an external library and is not part of the LLVM library itself. The function takes no arguments and returns no value. The function body is not provided in the code snippet, but it is likely to contain code that initializes the target machine for the specified ISA" LLVM,ARC,467,"The next statement of this code snippet is likely to be the initialization of the `LLVMInitializeTarget` function, which is a function that is defined in the LLVM library. The function is declared as `LLVM_EXTERNAL_VISIBILITY`, which means that it is defined in an external library and is not part of the LLVM library itself. The function takes no arguments and returns no value. The function body is not provided in the code snippet, but it is likely to contain code that initializes the target machine for the specified ISA" LLVM,ARC,468,"The next statement in the code snippet is: `BaseT::BaseT(std::move(static_cast(Arg)));` This is a constructor call to the `BaseT` class, passing in the result of `std::move(static_cast(Arg))`. The `std::move` function is used to convert the argument `Arg` to an rvalue reference, which can be used to move the contents of `Arg` into the `BaseT` object. The `static_cast` is used to cast the `Arg` object to" LLVM,ARC,469,"The next statement in the code snippet is: `BaseT::BaseT(std::move(static_cast(Arg)));` This is a constructor call to the `BaseT` class, passing in the result of `std::move(static_cast(Arg))`. The `std::move` function is used to convert the argument `Arg` to an rvalue reference, which can be used to move the contents of `Arg` into the `BaseT` object. The `static_cast` is used to cast the `Arg` object to" LLVM,ARC,470,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as the value of `ST` is not known. However, based on the syntax, it appears that the code is attempting to return a value from a function. The `return` statement is used to return a value from a function, and the value being returned is `ST`. Without knowing the value of `ST`, it is not possible to predict what the next statement of the code will be." LLVM,ARC,471,"It is not possible to predict the next statement of this code snippet with certainty, as it depends on the context in which the code is being executed. However, based on the syntax and the fact that the `return` statement is used to return a value from a function, it is likely that the next statement after this code snippet would be the end of the function."