File size: 10,782 Bytes
2ab0c2d 6a2c761 2ab0c2d 6a2c761 2ab0c2d 6a2c761 c4e1e6b 6a2c761 2ab0c2d 6a2c761 2ab0c2d 6a2c761 2ab0c2d 6a2c761 0132940 2ab0c2d 6a2c761 0132940 2ab0c2d |
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 |
---
library_name: transformers
base_model: meta-llama/Llama-3.1-70B-Instruct
datasets:
- infly/INF-ORM-Preference-Magnitude-80K
pipeline_tag: text-classification
---
<div align="center">
<img src="INF.jpg" width="300"/>
🤗 <a href="https://huggingface.co/infly" target="_blank">Hugging Face</a>
<br>
<br>
<br>
</div>
# INF Outcome Reward Model
## Introduction
[**INF-ORM-Llama3.1-70B**](https://huggingface.co/Skywork/Skywork-Reward-Gemma-2-27B-v0.2) is the outcome reward model roughly built on the [Llama-3.1-70B-Instruct](https://huggingface.co/meta-llama/Llama-3.1-70B-Instruct) architecture and trained with the dataset [INF-ORM-Preference-Magnitude-80K](https://huggingface.co/datasets/infly/INF-ORM-Preference-Magnitude-80K).
We did the following three things to improve the performance of our model.
### Data Pre-processing
We trained it on the dataset [INF-ORM-Preference-Magnitude-80K](https://huggingface.co/datasets/infly/INF-ORM-Preference-Magnitude-80K), which is derived from the **decontaminated dataset** [Skywork/Skywork-Reward-Perference-80k-v0.2](https://huggingface.co/datasets/Skywork/Skywork-Reward-Preference-80K-v0.2).
We use GPT-4o to evaluate the difference between the chosen answer and the rejected answer in the [Skywork/Skywork-Reward-Perference-80k-v0.2](https://huggingface.co/datasets/Skywork/Skywork-Reward-Preference-80K-v0.2) and then add the 'Magnitude' column in the dataset.
The evaluation follows the following rules:
1. If the chosen answer is much better than rejected answer, set 'Magnitude' value $d$ to 3.
2. If the chosen answer is better than the rejected answer, set 'Magnitude' value $d$ to 2.
3. If the chosen answer is slightly better than rejected answer, set 'Magnitude' value $d$ to 1.
After that, we train our model with the scaled BT loss. The scaled BT loss is defined as:
$$\mathcal{L}_{Scaled-BT} = -\alpha*d*log(\sigma(r_{\theta}(x, y_{c})-r_{\theta}(x, y_{r})))$$
where $\alpha$ is the scaling factor. You can find more details about scaled BT loss here [1](https://arxiv.org/pdf/2410.01257).
> Here we look at the performance gains of scaled BT loss from a different perspective than [1](https://arxiv.org/pdf/2410.01257). The scaled BT loss can be thought of as a form of cross-entropy, where the distribution of the difference of the logits produced by the model is sensitive to the distribution of the magnitude. Therefore, we improve the difference of the values in the 'Magnitude' column from 1, 2, 3 to 1, 3, 10 and finally get better performance.
### Modified Score Head
We use the modified score head instead of origin score head.
```python
# modified score head
self.score = nn.Sequential(
nn.Linear(config.hidden_size, config.hidden_size),
nn.ReLU(),
nn.Linear(config.hidden_size, 1)
)
# origin score head
self.score = nn.linear(config.hidden_size, 1)
```
### Model Merge
We trained two models and merge them with the weight $0.5$.
| Model | Score | Chat | Chat Hard | Safety | Reasoning |
| ----------------- | :---: | :---: | :-------: | :----: | :-------: |
| INF-ORM-v1 | 94.3 | 96.1 | 88.2 | 94.6 | 98.2 |
| INF-ORM-v2 | 94.4 | 95.5 | 90.8 | 93 | 99.1 |
| INF-ORM-v3(Averaged) | 95.1 | 96.6 | 91.0 | 93.6 | 99.1 |
## RewardBench Leaderboard
We evaluate our model on [RewardBench](https://huggingface.co/spaces/allenai/reward-bench) using the [official test script](https://github.com/allenai/reward-bench) locally. As of December 2024, INF-ORM-Llama3.1-70B ranks first on the RewardBench leaderboard.
| Rank | Model | Model Type | Score | Chat | Chat Hard | Safety | Reasoning |
| :---: | -------------------------------------------- | ----------------- | :---: | :---: | :-------: | :----: | :-------: |
| 1 | **infly/INF-ORM-Llama3.1-70B** | Seq. Classifier | 95.1 | 96.6 | 91.0 | 93.6 | 99.1 |
| 2 | Skywork/Skywork-Reward-Gemma-2-27B-v0.2 | Seq. Classifier | 94.3 | 96.1 | 89.9 | 93.0 | 98.1 |
| 3 | nvidia/Llama-3.1-Nemotron-70B-Reward | Custom Classifier | 94.1 | 97.5 | 85.7 | 95.1 | 98.1 |
| 4 | Skywork/Skywork-Reward-Gemma-2-27B | Seq. Classifier | 93.8 | 95.8 | 91.4 | 91.9 | 96.1 |
| 5 | SF-Foundation/TextEval-Llama3.1-70B | Generative | 93.5 | 94.1 | 90.1 | 93.2 | 96.4 |
| 6 | meta-metrics/MetaMetrics-RM-v1.0 | Custom Classifier | 93.4 | 98.3 | 86.4 | 90.8 | 98.2 |
| 7 | Skywork/Skywork-Critic-Llama-3.1-70B | Generative | 93.3 | 96.6 | 87.9 | 93.1 | 95.5 |
| 8 | Skywork/Skywork-Reward-Llama-3.1-8B-v0.2 | Seq. Classifier | 93.1 | 94.7 | 88.4 | 92.7 | 96.7 |
| 9 | nicolinho/QRM-Llama3.1-8B | Seq. Classifier | 93.1 | 94.4 | 89.7 | 92.3 | 95.8 |
| 10 | LxzGordon/URM-LLaMa-3.1-8B | Seq. Classifier | 92.9 | 95.5 | 88.2 | 91.1 | 97.0 |
## Demo Code
We provide an example usage of the INF-ORM-Llama3.1-70B below.
Below is an example of obtaining the reward scores of two conversations.
```python
from typing import List, Optional, Union
import torch
import torch.nn as nn
from transformers import LlamaPreTrainedModel, LlamaModel, PreTrainedTokenizerFast
from transformers.modeling_outputs import SequenceClassifierOutputWithPast
class INFORMForSequenceClassification(LlamaPreTrainedModel):
def __init__(self, config):
super().__init__(config)
self.num_labels = config.num_labels
self.model = LlamaModel(config)
self.score = nn.Sequential(
nn.Linear(config.hidden_size, config.hidden_size),
nn.ReLU(),
nn.Linear(config.hidden_size, self.num_labels)
)
# Initialize weights and apply final processing
self.post_init()
def forward(
self,
input_ids: Optional[torch.LongTensor] = None,
attention_mask: Optional[torch.Tensor] = None,
position_ids: Optional[torch.LongTensor] = None,
past_key_values: Optional[List[torch.FloatTensor]] = None,
inputs_embeds: Optional[torch.FloatTensor] = None,
labels: Optional[torch.LongTensor] = None,
use_cache: Optional[bool] = None,
output_attentions: Optional[bool] = None,
output_hidden_states: Optional[bool] = None,
return_dict: Optional[bool] = None,
):
transformer_outputs = self.model(
input_ids,
attention_mask=attention_mask,
position_ids=position_ids,
past_key_values=past_key_values,
inputs_embeds=inputs_embeds,
)
hidden_states = transformer_outputs[0]
logits = self.score(hidden_states)
if input_ids is not None:
batch_size = input_ids.shape[0]
else:
batch_size = inputs_embeds.shape[0]
if self.config.pad_token_id is None and batch_size != 1:
raise ValueError("Cannot handle batch sizes > 1 if no padding token is defined.")
if self.config.pad_token_id is None:
sequence_lengths = -1
else:
if input_ids is not None:
# if no pad token found, use modulo instead of reverse indexing for ONNX compatibility
sequence_lengths = torch.eq(input_ids, self.config.pad_token_id).int().argmax(-1) - 1
sequence_lengths = sequence_lengths % input_ids.shape[-1]
sequence_lengths = sequence_lengths.to(logits.device)
else:
sequence_lengths = -1
pooled_logits = logits[torch.arange(batch_size, device=logits.device), sequence_lengths]
loss = None
return SequenceClassifierOutputWithPast(
loss=loss,
logits=pooled_logits,
past_key_values=transformer_outputs.past_key_values,
hidden_states=transformer_outputs.hidden_states,
attentions=transformer_outputs.attentions,
)
# Load model
model_name = "infly/INF-ORM-Llama3.1-70B"
orm = INFORMForSequenceClassification.from_pretrained(
model_name,
torch_dtype=torch.bfloat16,
device_map="auto",
attn_implementation="flash_attention_2",
num_labels=1,
)
# Load tokenizer
tokenizer = PreTrainedTokenizerFast.from_pretrained(model_name)
conv1 = [ { "content": "Tom has 20 oranges. He gave 5 oranges to his friend Lisa, then he bought 3 more oranges. Finally, he divided all the oranges equally among himself and his 4 friends. How many oranges does each person get?", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Tom has 20 oranges. He gave 5 oranges to Lisa. 20 - 5 = 15. Tom now has 15 oranges. Tom bought 3 more oranges. 15 + 3 = 18. Tom now has 18 oranges. Tom divides the 18 oranges equally among himself and his 4 friends (a total of 5 people). 18 ÷ 5 = 3.6 oranges. Each person gets 3.6 oranges.", "role": "assistant" } ]
conv2= [ { "content": "Tom has 20 oranges. He gave 5 oranges to his friend Lisa, then he bought 3 more oranges. Finally, he divided all the oranges equally among himself and his 4 friends. How many oranges does each person get?", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Tom has 20 oranges. He gave 5 oranges to his friend Lisa. 20 - 5 = 15. Tom now has 15 oranges. Tom bought 3 more oranges. 15 + 3 = 18. Tom now has 18 oranges. Tom divides the 18 oranges equally among his 4 friends (a total of 4 people). 18 ÷ 4 = 4.5 oranges. Each person gets 4.5 oranges.", "role": "assistant" } ]
conv1_tokenized = tokenizer.apply_chat_template(conv1, tokenize=True, return_tensors="pt").to("cuda")
conv2_tokenized = tokenizer.apply_chat_template(conv2, tokenize=True, return_tensors="pt").to("cuda")
# Inference
with torch.no_grad():
score1 = orm(conv1_tokenized).logits[0][0].item()
score2 = orm(conv2_tokenized).logits[0][0].item()
print(f"Score for response 1: {score1}")
print(f"Score for response 2: {score2}")
# Output:
# Score for response 1: 4.96875
# Score for response 2: 2.890625
```
## License Agreement
INF-ORM-Llama3.1-70B support commercial applications under a permissive [License](https://huggingface.co/infly/INF-ORM-Llama3.1-70B/blob/main/LICENSE).
## Contact
If you have any questions, please feel free to reach us at Yang Minghao <[email protected]>, Qu Chao <[email protected]> and Tan Xiaoyu <[email protected]>.
## Acknowledgement
This work was done during my internship at INF. I would like to thank my mentor (Qu Chao, Tan Xiaoyu) and the INF team for their support. Their insights and expertise greatly contributed to the successful completion of this work.
|