PEFT
Safetensors
English
manupinasco commited on
Commit
f0e483d
·
verified ·
1 Parent(s): 5ab787c

Update README.md

Browse files
Files changed (1) hide show
  1. README.md +4 -25
README.md CHANGED
@@ -3,45 +3,32 @@ base_model: unsloth/meta-llama-3.1-8b-instruct-bnb-4bit
3
  library_name: peft
4
  ---
5
 
6
- # Model Card for Fine-Tuned LLaMA 3.1 on Dependency Parsing
7
 
8
- <!-- Provide a quick summary of what the model is/does. -->
9
  This model is a fine-tuned version of **LLaMA 3.1** specifically designed to automate dependency parsing of simple sentences, categorizing words into their syntactic roles according to Universal Dependency Parsing tags.
10
 
11
  ## Model Details
12
 
13
  ### Model Description
14
 
15
- <!-- Provide a longer summary of what this model is. -->
16
  The model has been fine-tuned to accurately parse simple sentences by classifying each word into its respective dependency category, such as `nsubj`, `obj`, and `root`, following the Universal Dependency framework. This fine-tuning enhances the LLaMA 3.1 model's ability to understand and analyze sentence structures, making it a valuable tool for linguistic analysis and natural language processing tasks.
17
 
18
  - **Developed by:** Emanuel Pinasco
19
  - **Model type:** NLP, Dependency Parsing
20
  - **Language(s) (NLP):** English
21
 
22
- ## Uses
23
-
24
- <!-- Address questions around how the model is intended to be used, including the foreseeable users of the model and those affected by the model. -->
25
-
26
  ### Direct Use
27
 
28
- <!-- This section is for the model use without fine-tuning or plugging into a larger ecosystem/app. -->
29
  The model can be used directly for syntactic analysis and linguistic research, where dependency parsing is required to understand sentence structures. It’s particularly suited for tasks involving simple sentence parsing.
30
 
31
  ### Downstream Use [optional]
32
 
33
- <!-- This section is for the model use when fine-tuned for a task, or when plugged into a larger ecosystem/app -->
34
  Ideal for integration into larger NLP systems that require detailed sentence parsing, such as grammar checking tools, machine translation systems, and educational software.
35
 
36
  ### Out-of-Scope Use
37
 
38
- <!-- This section addresses misuse, malicious use, and uses that the model will not work well for. -->
39
  The model is not designed for complex sentence structures, idiomatic expressions, or languages other than English. Misuse may involve attempts to apply it to tasks beyond simple dependency parsing, leading to inaccurate results.
40
 
41
- ## Bias, Risks, and Limitations
42
-
43
- <!-- This section is meant to convey both technical and sociotechnical limitations. -->
44
-
45
  ### Recommendations
46
 
47
  Users (both direct and downstream) should be aware that the model's accuracy may decline with more complex or less conventional sentence structures. It's recommended to use this model in conjunction with other tools for more comprehensive linguistic analysis.
@@ -50,12 +37,11 @@ Users (both direct and downstream) should be aware that the model's accuracy may
50
 
51
  ### Training Data
52
 
53
- <!-- This should link to a Dataset Card, perhaps with a short stub of information on what the training data is all about as well as documentation related to data pre-processing or additional filtering. -->
54
  The model was trained on a curated dataset of simple English sentences annotated with Universal Dependency Parsing tags. The training data focused on ensuring high accuracy in syntactic role assignment.
55
 
56
  ### Training Procedure
57
 
58
- <!-- This relates heavily to the Technical Specifications. Content here should link to that section when it is relevant to the training procedure. -->
59
 
60
  #### Training Hyperparameters
61
 
@@ -63,34 +49,27 @@ The model was trained on a curated dataset of simple English sentences annotated
63
 
64
  ## Evaluation
65
 
66
- <!-- This section describes the evaluation protocols and provides the results. -->
67
 
68
  ### Testing Data, Factors & Metrics
69
 
 
70
  #### Testing Data
71
 
72
- <!-- This should link to a Dataset Card if possible. -->
73
  The model was evaluated using a separate dataset of simple sentences annotated with Universal Dependency tags.
74
 
75
  #### Factors
76
 
77
- <!-- These are the things the evaluation is disaggregating by, e.g., subpopulations or domains. -->
78
  Evaluation focused on sentence simplicity, vocabulary diversity, and syntactic structure variations.
79
 
80
  #### Metrics
81
 
82
- <!-- These are the evaluation metrics being used, ideally with a description of why. -->
83
  Accuracy in word classification into dependency categories was the primary metric.
84
 
85
  #### Summary
86
 
87
  The fine-tuned model demonstrates high accuracy in dependency parsing of simple English sentences, making it a robust tool for basic syntactic analysis.
88
 
89
- ## Environmental Impact
90
-
91
- <!-- Total emissions (in grams of CO2eq) and additional considerations, such as electricity usage, go here. Edit the suggested text below accordingly -->
92
- Carbon emissions can be estimated using the [Machine Learning Impact calculator](https://mlco2.github.io/impact#compute) presented in [Lacoste et al. (2019)](https://arxiv.org/abs/1910.09700).
93
-
94
  ## Model Card Authors
95
 
96
  Emanuel Pinasco
 
3
  library_name: peft
4
  ---
5
 
6
+ # Fine-Tuned LLaMA 3.1 on Dependency Parsing
7
 
 
8
  This model is a fine-tuned version of **LLaMA 3.1** specifically designed to automate dependency parsing of simple sentences, categorizing words into their syntactic roles according to Universal Dependency Parsing tags.
9
 
10
  ## Model Details
11
 
12
  ### Model Description
13
 
 
14
  The model has been fine-tuned to accurately parse simple sentences by classifying each word into its respective dependency category, such as `nsubj`, `obj`, and `root`, following the Universal Dependency framework. This fine-tuning enhances the LLaMA 3.1 model's ability to understand and analyze sentence structures, making it a valuable tool for linguistic analysis and natural language processing tasks.
15
 
16
  - **Developed by:** Emanuel Pinasco
17
  - **Model type:** NLP, Dependency Parsing
18
  - **Language(s) (NLP):** English
19
 
 
 
 
 
20
  ### Direct Use
21
 
 
22
  The model can be used directly for syntactic analysis and linguistic research, where dependency parsing is required to understand sentence structures. It’s particularly suited for tasks involving simple sentence parsing.
23
 
24
  ### Downstream Use [optional]
25
 
 
26
  Ideal for integration into larger NLP systems that require detailed sentence parsing, such as grammar checking tools, machine translation systems, and educational software.
27
 
28
  ### Out-of-Scope Use
29
 
 
30
  The model is not designed for complex sentence structures, idiomatic expressions, or languages other than English. Misuse may involve attempts to apply it to tasks beyond simple dependency parsing, leading to inaccurate results.
31
 
 
 
 
 
32
  ### Recommendations
33
 
34
  Users (both direct and downstream) should be aware that the model's accuracy may decline with more complex or less conventional sentence structures. It's recommended to use this model in conjunction with other tools for more comprehensive linguistic analysis.
 
37
 
38
  ### Training Data
39
 
 
40
  The model was trained on a curated dataset of simple English sentences annotated with Universal Dependency Parsing tags. The training data focused on ensuring high accuracy in syntactic role assignment.
41
 
42
  ### Training Procedure
43
 
44
+
45
 
46
  #### Training Hyperparameters
47
 
 
49
 
50
  ## Evaluation
51
 
52
+
53
 
54
  ### Testing Data, Factors & Metrics
55
 
56
+
57
  #### Testing Data
58
 
 
59
  The model was evaluated using a separate dataset of simple sentences annotated with Universal Dependency tags.
60
 
61
  #### Factors
62
 
 
63
  Evaluation focused on sentence simplicity, vocabulary diversity, and syntactic structure variations.
64
 
65
  #### Metrics
66
 
 
67
  Accuracy in word classification into dependency categories was the primary metric.
68
 
69
  #### Summary
70
 
71
  The fine-tuned model demonstrates high accuracy in dependency parsing of simple English sentences, making it a robust tool for basic syntactic analysis.
72
 
 
 
 
 
 
73
  ## Model Card Authors
74
 
75
  Emanuel Pinasco