File size: 9,960 Bytes
f87cafb 4cebcbc f87cafb 4cebcbc cfb4e41 c73516c 85a6da2 37d864e f87cafb 4cebcbc fd2369f 4cebcbc 93edba3 4cebcbc 85a6da2 4cebcbc 93edba3 4cebcbc 93edba3 4cebcbc 4f19e0a 4cebcbc 4f19e0a 4cebcbc 93edba3 4f19e0a 93edba3 4f19e0a 4cebcbc 4f19e0a 4cebcbc 4f19e0a 93edba3 4f19e0a 93edba3 4f19e0a 93edba3 4f19e0a 0e2aca0 24a24ea 4cebcbc 0e2aca0 4cebcbc 0e2aca0 4cebcbc 85a6da2 4cebcbc 0e2aca0 85a6da2 0e2aca0 066a422 |
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 |
---
language: en
license: mit
tags:
- keyphrase-extraction
datasets:
- midas/inspec
metrics:
- seqeval
widget:
- text: "Keyphrase extraction is a technique in text analysis where you extract the important keyphrases from a text. Since this is a time-consuming process, Artificial Intelligence is used to automate it. Currently, classical machine learning methods, that use statistics and linguistics, are widely used for the extraction process. The fact that these methods have been widely used in the community has the advantage that there are many easy-to-use libraries. Now with the recent innovations in deep learning methods (such as recurrent neural networks and transformers, GANS, …), keyphrase extraction can be improved. These new methods also focus on the semantics and context of a document, which is quite an improvement."
example_title: "Example 1"
- text: "In this work, we explore how to learn taskspecific language models aimed towards learning rich representation of keyphrases fromtext documents. We experiment with different masking strategies for pre-training transformer language models (LMs) in discriminative as well as generative settings. In thediscriminative setting, we introduce a newpre-training objective - Keyphrase BoundaryInfilling with Replacement (KBIR), showinglarge gains in performance (upto 9.26 pointsin F1) over SOTA, when LM pre-trained usingKBIR is fine-tuned for the task of keyphraseextraction. In the generative setting, we introduce a new pre-training setup for BART - KeyBART, that reproduces the keyphrases relatedto the input text in the CatSeq format, insteadof the denoised original input. This also ledto gains in performance (upto 4.33 points inF1@M) over SOTA for keyphrase generation.Additionally, we also fine-tune the pre-trainedlanguage models on named entity recognition(NER), question answering (QA), relation extraction (RE), abstractive summarization andachieve comparable performance with that ofthe SOTA, showing that learning rich representation of keyphrases is indeed beneficial formany other fundamental NLP tasks."
example_title: "Example 2"
---
** Work in progress **
# 🔑 Keyphrase Extraction model: KBIR-inspec
Keyphrase extraction is a technique in text analysis where you extract the important keyphrases from a text. Since this is a time-consuming process, Artificial Intelligence is used to automate it.
Currently, classical machine learning methods, that use statistics and linguistics, are widely used for the extraction process. The fact that these methods have been widely used in the community has the advantage that there are many easy-to-use libraries.
Now with the recent innovations in deep learning methods (such as recurrent neural networks and transformers, GANS, …), keyphrase extraction can be improved. These new methods also focus on the semantics and context of a document, which is quite an improvement.
## 📓 Model Description
This model is a KBIR pre-trained model fine-tuned on the Inspec dataset. KBIR
Keyphrase Boundary Infilling with Replacement (KBIR) which utilizes a multi-task learning setup for optimizing a combined loss of Masked Language Modeling (MLM), Keyphrase Boundary Infilling (KBI) and Keyphrase Replacement Classification (KRC).
Paper: https://arxiv.org/abs/2112.08547
## ✋ Intended uses & limitations
### ❓ How to use
```python
# Define post_process functions
def concat_tokens_by_tag(keyphrases):
keyphrase_tokens = []
for id, label in keyphrases:
if label == "B":
keyphrase_tokens.append([id])
elif label == "I":
if len(keyphrase_tokens) > 0:
keyphrase_tokens[len(keyphrase_tokens) - 1].append(id)
return keyphrase_tokens
def extract_keyphrases(example, predictions, tokenizer, index=0):
keyphrases_list = [
(id, idx2label[label])
for id, label in zip(
np.array(example["input_ids"]).squeeze().tolist(), predictions[index]
)
if idx2label[label] in ["B", "I"]
]
processed_keyphrases = concat_tokens_by_tag(keyphrases_list)
extracted_kps = tokenizer.batch_decode(
processed_keyphrases,
skip_special_tokens=True,
clean_up_tokenization_spaces=True,
)
return np.unique([kp.strip() for kp in extracted_kps])
```
```python
# Load model and tokenizer
model_name = "DeDeckerThomas/keyphrase-extraction-kbir-inspec"
tokenizer = AutoTokenizer.from_pretrained(model_name)
model = AutoModelForTokenClassification.from_pretrained(model_name)
```
```python
# Inference
text = """
Keyphrase extraction is a technique in text analysis where you extract the important keyphrases
from a text. Since this is a time-consuming process, Artificial Intelligence is used to automate it.
Currently, classical machine learning methods, that use statistics and linguistics, are widely used
for the extraction process. The fact that these methods have been widely used in the community has
the advantage that there are many easy-to-use libraries. Now with the recent innovations in
deep learning methods (such as recurrent neural networks and transformers, GANS, …),
keyphrase extraction can be improved. These new methods also focus on the semantics
and context of a document, which is quite an improvement.
""".replace("\n", "")
encoded_input = tokenizer(
text,
truncation=True,
padding="max_length",
max_length=max_length,
return_tensors="pt",
)
output = model(**encoded_input)
logits = output.logits.detach().numpy()
predictions = np.argmax(logits, axis=2)
extracted_kps = extract_keyphrases(encoded_input, predictions, tokenizer)
print("***** Input Document *****")
print(text)
print("***** Prediction *****")
print(extracted_kps)
```
```
***** Input Document *****
Keyphrase extraction is a technique in text analysis where you extract the important keyphrases
from a text. Since this is a time-consuming process, Artificial Intelligence is used to automate it.
Currently, classical machine learning methods, that use statistics and linguistics, are widely used
for the extraction process. The fact that these methods have been widely used in the community has
the advantage that there are many easy-to-use libraries. Now with the recent innovations in
deep learning methods (such as recurrent neural networks and transformers, GANS, …),
keyphrase extraction can be improved. These new methods also focus on the semantics
and context of a document, which is quite an improvement.
***** Prediction *****
['Artificial Intelligence' 'GANS' 'Keyphrase extraction'
'classical machine learning' 'deep learning methods'
'keyphrase extraction' 'linguistics' 'recurrent neural networks'
'semantics' 'statistics' 'text analysis' 'transformers']
```
### 🛑 Limitations
* The model performs very well on abstracts of scientific papers. Please be aware that this model very domain-specific.
* Only works in English.
## [📚 Training Dataset](https://huggingface.co/datasets/midas/inspec)
## 👷♂️ Training procedure
The model is fine-tuned as a token classification problem where the text is labeled using the BIO scheme.
- B => Begin of a keyphrase
- I => Inside of a keyphrase
- O => Ouside of a keyphrase
For more information, you can take a look at the training notebook.
### Preprocessing
```python
def preprocess_fuction(all_samples_per_split):
tokenized_samples = tokenizer.batch_encode_plus(
all_samples_per_split[dataset_document_column],
padding="max_length",
truncation=True,
is_split_into_words=True,
max_length=max_length,
)
total_adjusted_labels = []
for k in range(0, len(tokenized_samples["input_ids"])):
prev_wid = -1
word_ids_list = tokenized_samples.word_ids(batch_index=k)
existing_label_ids = all_samples_per_split[dataset_biotags_column][k]
i = -1
adjusted_label_ids = []
for wid in word_ids_list:
if wid is None:
adjusted_label_ids.append(lbl2idx["O"])
elif wid != prev_wid:
i = i + 1
adjusted_label_ids.append(lbl2idx[existing_label_ids[i]])
prev_wid = wid
else:
adjusted_label_ids.append(
lbl2idx[
f"{'I' if existing_label_ids[i] == 'B' else existing_label_ids[i]}"
]
)
total_adjusted_labels.append(adjusted_label_ids)
tokenized_samples["labels"] = total_adjusted_labels
return tokenized_samples
```
## 📝Evaluation results
One of the traditional evaluation methods are the precision, recall and F1-score @k,m where k is the number that stands for the first k predicted keyphrases and m for the average amount of predicted keyphrases.
The model achieves the following results on the Inspec test set:
| Dataset | P@5 | R@5 | F1@5 | P@10 | R@10 | F1@10 | P@M | R@M | F1@M |
|:-----------------:|:----:|:----:|:----:|:----:|:----:|:-----:|:----:|:----:|:----:|
| Inspec Test Set | 0.53 | 0.47 | 0.46 | 0.36 | 0.58 | 0.41 | 0.58 | 0.60 | 0.56 |
For more information on the evaluation process, you can take a look at the keyphrase extraction evaluation notebook.
### Bibliography
Debanjan Mahata, Navneet Agarwal, Dibya Gautam, Amardeep Kumar, Sagar Dhiman, Anish Acharya, & Rajiv Ratn Shah. (2021). LDkp Dataset [Data set]. Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5501744
Kulkarni, Mayank, Debanjan Mahata, Ravneet Arora, and Rajarshi Bhowmik. "Learning Rich Representation of Keyphrases from Text." arXiv preprint arXiv:2112.08547 (2021).
Sahrawat, Dhruva, Debanjan Mahata, Haimin Zhang, Mayank Kulkarni, Agniv Sharma, Rakesh Gosangi, Amanda Stent, Yaman Kumar, Rajiv Ratn Shah, and Roger Zimmermann. "Keyphrase extraction as sequence labeling using contextualized embeddings." In European Conference on Information Retrieval, pp. 328-335. Springer, Cham, 2020. |