File size: 11,194 Bytes
f87cafb
4cebcbc
f87cafb
 
4cebcbc
 
cfb4e41
 
c73516c
85a6da2
37d864e
 
 
fb091b7
37d864e
6242d3b
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
0835692
ebe7d3c
0835692
f87cafb
4cebcbc
fd2369f
4cebcbc
93edba3
4cebcbc
 
 
910d2eb
 
 
 
ffebfc3
910d2eb
 
7c899d9
 
910d2eb
 
 
ffebfc3
910d2eb
4cebcbc
 
910d2eb
ffebfc3
910d2eb
ffebfc3
910d2eb
4cebcbc
 
9aec2f2
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
4f8e3db
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
4cebcbc
 
4f8e3db
 
 
 
 
 
4cebcbc
4f19e0a
 
 
4f8e3db
4cebcbc
4f8e3db
4f19e0a
 
4cebcbc
 
4f8e3db
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
4cebcbc
 
4f8e3db
4cebcbc
4f8e3db
4cebcbc
 
4f19e0a
4f8e3db
93edba3
 
 
4f19e0a
 
 
612d613
 
 
 
0e2aca0
612d613
 
4cebcbc
e2808d7
 
545eea0
 
 
 
 
e2808d7
0b80417
fb091b7
0e2aca0
63ded27
 
 
 
 
0e2aca0
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
e2808d7
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
82d6c5a
4cebcbc
fb091b7
4cebcbc
 
 
 
 
 
82d6c5a
 
 
 
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
---

language: en
license: mit
tags:
- keyphrase-extraction
datasets:
- midas/inspec
metrics:
- seqeval
widget:
- text: "Keyphrase extraction is a technique in text analysis where you extract the important keyphrases from a text. Since this is a time-consuming process, Artificial Intelligence is used to automate it. Currently, classical machine learning methods, that use statistics and linguistics, are widely used for the extraction process. The fact that these methods have been widely used in the community has the advantage that there are many easy-to-use libraries.  Now with the recent innovations in deep learning methods (such as recurrent neural networks and transformers, GANS, …), keyphrase extraction can be improved. These new methods also focus on the semantics and context of a document, which is quite an improvement."
  example_title: "Example 1"
- text: "In this work, we explore how to learn task specific language models aimed towards learning rich representation of keyphrases from text documents. We experiment with different masking strategies for pre-training transformer language models (LMs) in discriminative as well as generative settings. In the discriminative setting, we introduce a new pre-training objective - Keyphrase Boundary Infilling with Replacement (KBIR), showing large gains in performance (up to 9.26 points in F1) over SOTA, when LM pre-trained using KBIR is fine-tuned for the task of keyphrase extraction. In the generative setting, we introduce a new pre-training setup for BART - KeyBART, that reproduces the keyphrases related to the input text in the CatSeq format, instead of the denoised original input. This also led to gains in performance (up to 4.33 points inF1@M) over SOTA for keyphrase generation. Additionally, we also fine-tune the pre-trained language models on named entity recognition(NER), question answering (QA), relation extraction (RE), abstractive summarization and achieve comparable performance with that of the SOTA, showing that learning rich representation of keyphrases is indeed beneficial for many other fundamental NLP tasks."
  example_title: "Example 2"
model-index:
- name: DeDeckerThomas/keyphrase-extraction-kbir-inspec
  results:
  - task: 
      type: keyphrase-extraction
      name: Keyphrase Extraction
    dataset:
      type: midas/inspec
      name: inspec
    metrics:
      - type: seqeval 
        value: 0.588
        name: F1-score
---
# πŸ”‘ Keyphrase Extraction model: KBIR-inspec
Keyphrase extraction is a technique in text analysis where you extract the important keyphrases from a text. Since this is a time-consuming process, Artificial Intelligence is used to automate it.
Currently, classical machine learning methods, that use statistics and linguistics, are widely used for the extraction process. The fact that these methods have been widely used in the community has the advantage that there are many easy-to-use libraries. 
Now with the recent innovations in deep learning methods (such as recurrent neural networks and transformers, GANS, …), keyphrase extraction can be improved. These new methods also focus on the semantics and context of a document, which is quite an improvement.


## πŸ““ Model Description
This model is a fine-tuned KBIR model on the Inspec dataset. KBIR or Keyphrase Boundary Infilling with Replacement is a pre-trained model which utilizes a multi-task learning setup for optimizing a combined loss of Masked Language Modeling (MLM), Keyphrase Boundary Infilling (KBI) and Keyphrase Replacement Classification (KRC).
You can find more information about the architecture in this paper: https://arxiv.org/abs/2112.08547.

The model is fine-tuned as a token classification problem where the text is labeled using the BIO scheme.

| Label | Description                     |
| ----- | ------------------------------- |
| B-KEY | At the beginning of a keyphrase |
| I-KEY | Inside a keyphrase              |
| O     | Outside a keyphrase             |

Kulkarni, Mayank, Debanjan Mahata, Ravneet Arora, and Rajarshi Bhowmik. "Learning Rich Representation of Keyphrases from Text." arXiv preprint arXiv:2112.08547 (2021).

Sahrawat, Dhruva, Debanjan Mahata, Haimin Zhang, Mayank Kulkarni, Agniv Sharma, Rakesh Gosangi, Amanda Stent, Yaman Kumar, Rajiv Ratn Shah, and Roger Zimmermann. "Keyphrase extraction as sequence labeling using contextualized embeddings." In European Conference on Information Retrieval, pp. 328-335. Springer, Cham, 2020.

## βœ‹ Intended uses & limitations
### πŸ›‘ Limitations
* This keyphrase extraction model is very domain-specific and will perform very well on abstracts of scientific papers. It's not recommended to use this model for other domains, but you are free to test it out.
* Only works for English documents.
* For a custom model, please consult the training notebook for more information (link incoming).

### ❓ How to use
```python
from transformers import (
    TokenClassificationPipeline,
    AutoModelForTokenClassification,
    AutoTokenizer,
)
from transformers.pipelines import AggregationStrategy
import numpy as np

# Define keyphrase extraction pipeline
class KeyphraseExtractionPipeline(TokenClassificationPipeline):
    def __init__(self, model, *args, **kwargs):
        super().__init__(
            model=AutoModelForTokenClassification.from_pretrained(model),
            tokenizer=AutoTokenizer.from_pretrained(model),
            *args,
            **kwargs
        )

    def postprocess(self, model_outputs):
        results = super().postprocess(
            model_outputs=model_outputs,
            aggregation_strategy=AggregationStrategy.SIMPLE,
        )
        return np.unique([result.get("word").strip() for result in results])

```

```python
# Load pipeline
model_name = "DeDeckerThomas/keyphrase-extraction-kbir-inspec"
extractor = KeyphraseExtractionPipeline(model=model_name)
```
```python
# Inference
text = """
Keyphrase extraction is a technique in text analysis where you extract the important keyphrases from a text. 
Since this is a time-consuming process, Artificial Intelligence is used to automate it.
Currently, classical machine learning methods, that use statistics and linguistics, are widely used for the extraction process. 
The fact that these methods have been widely used in the community has the advantage that there are many easy-to-use libraries. 
Now with the recent innovations in deep learning methods (such as recurrent neural networks and transformers, GANS, …), 
keyphrase extraction can be improved. These new methods also focus on the semantics and context of a document, which is quite an improvement.
""".replace(
    "\n", ""
)

keyphrases = extractor(text)

print(keyphrases)
```

```
# Output
['Artificial Intelligence' 'GANS' 'Keyphrase extraction'
 'classical machine learning' 'deep learning methods'
 'keyphrase extraction' 'linguistics' 'recurrent neural networks'
 'semantics' 'statistics' 'text analysis' 'transformers']
```

## πŸ“š Training Dataset
Inspec is a keyphrase extraction/generation dataset consisting of 2000 English scientific papers from the scientific domains of Computers and Control and Information Technology published between 1998 to 2002. The keyphrases are annotated by professional indexers or editors.

You can find more information here: https://huggingface.co/datasets/midas/inspec

## πŸ‘·β€β™‚οΈ Training procedure
For more in detail information, you can take a look at the training notebook (link incoming).

### Training parameters

| Parameter | Value |
| --------- | ------|
| Learning Rate | 1e-4 |
| Epochs | 50 |
| Early Stopping Patience | 3 |

### Preprocessing
The documents in the dataset are already preprocessed into list of words with the corresponding labels. The only thing that must be done is tokenization and the realignment of the labels so that they correspond with the right subword tokens.
```python
# Labels
label_list = ["B", "I", "O"]
lbl2idx = {"B": 0, "I": 1, "O": 2}
idx2label = {0: "B", 1: "I", 2: "O"}

def preprocess_fuction(all_samples_per_split):
    tokenized_samples = tokenizer.batch_encode_plus(
        all_samples_per_split[dataset_document_column],
        padding="max_length",
        truncation=True,
        is_split_into_words=True,
        max_length=max_length,
    )
    total_adjusted_labels = []
    for k in range(0, len(tokenized_samples["input_ids"])):
        prev_wid = -1
        word_ids_list = tokenized_samples.word_ids(batch_index=k)
        existing_label_ids = all_samples_per_split[dataset_biotags_column][k]
        i = -1
        adjusted_label_ids = []

        for wid in word_ids_list:
            if wid is None:
                adjusted_label_ids.append(lbl2idx["O"])
            elif wid != prev_wid:
                i = i + 1
                adjusted_label_ids.append(lbl2idx[existing_label_ids[i]])
                prev_wid = wid
            else:
                adjusted_label_ids.append(
                    lbl2idx[
                        f"{'I' if existing_label_ids[i] == 'B' else existing_label_ids[i]}"
                    ]
                )

        total_adjusted_labels.append(adjusted_label_ids)
    tokenized_samples["labels"] = total_adjusted_labels
    return tokenized_samples
```

### Postprocessing
For the post-processing, you will need to filter out the B and I labeled tokens and concat the consecutive B and Is. As last you strip the keyphrase to ensure all spaces are removed.
```python
# Define post_process functions
def concat_tokens_by_tag(keyphrases):
    keyphrase_tokens = []
    for id, label in keyphrases:
        if label == "B":
            keyphrase_tokens.append([id])
        elif label == "I":
            if len(keyphrase_tokens) > 0:
                keyphrase_tokens[len(keyphrase_tokens) - 1].append(id)
    return keyphrase_tokens


def extract_keyphrases(example, predictions, tokenizer, index=0):
    keyphrases_list = [
        (id, idx2label[label])
        for id, label in zip(
            np.array(example["input_ids"]).squeeze().tolist(), predictions[index]
        )
        if idx2label[label] in ["B", "I"]
    ]

    processed_keyphrases = concat_tokens_by_tag(keyphrases_list)
    extracted_kps = tokenizer.batch_decode(
        processed_keyphrases,
        skip_special_tokens=True,
        clean_up_tokenization_spaces=True,
    )
    return np.unique([kp.strip() for kp in extracted_kps])

```
## πŸ“ Evaluation results

One of the traditional evaluation methods is the precision, recall and F1-score @k,m where k is the number that stands for the first k predicted keyphrases and m for the average amount of predicted keyphrases.
The model achieves the following results on the Inspec test set:

| Dataset           | P@5  | R@5  | F1@5 | P@10 | R@10 | F1@10 | P@M  | R@M  | F1@M |
|:-----------------:|:----:|:----:|:----:|:----:|:----:|:-----:|:----:|:----:|:----:|
| Inspec Test Set   | 0.53 | 0.47 | 0.46 | 0.36 | 0.58 | 0.41  | 0.58 | 0.60 | 0.56 |

For more information on the evaluation process, you can take a look at the keyphrase extraction evaluation notebook.

## 🚨 Issues
Please feel free to contact Thomas De Decker for any problems with this model.