Thomas De Decker commited on
Commit
23eccc5
β€’
2 Parent(s): afe6c76 fb091b7

Merge branch 'main' of https://huggingface.co/DeDeckerThomas/keyphrase-extraction-kbir-inspec

Browse files
Files changed (1) hide show
  1. README.md +45 -23
README.md CHANGED
@@ -8,7 +8,24 @@ datasets:
8
  - midas/inspec
9
  metrics:
10
  - seqeval
11
-
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
12
  ---
13
  ** Work in progress **
14
  # πŸ”‘ Keyphrase Extraction model: KBIR-inspec
@@ -18,11 +35,27 @@ Now with the recent innovations in deep learning methods (such as recurrent neur
18
 
19
 
20
  ## πŸ““ Model Description
21
- This model is a KBIR pre-trained model fine-tuned on the Inspec dataset. KBIR
22
- Keyphrase Boundary Infilling with Replacement (KBIR) which utilizes a multi-task learning setup for optimizing a combined loss of Masked Language Modeling (MLM), Keyphrase Boundary Infilling (KBI) and Keyphrase Replacement Classification (KRC).
23
- Paper: https://arxiv.org/abs/2112.08547
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
24
 
25
  ## βœ‹ Intended uses & limitations
 
 
 
 
 
26
  ### ❓ How to use
27
  ```python
28
  # Define post_process functions
@@ -114,20 +147,16 @@ and context of a document, which is quite an improvement.
114
  'semantics' 'statistics' 'text analysis' 'transformers']
115
  ```
116
 
117
- ### πŸ›‘ Limitations
118
- * The model performs very well on abstracts of scientific papers. Please be aware that this model very domain-specific.
119
- * Only works in English.
120
 
121
- ## [πŸ“š Training Dataset](https://huggingface.co/datasets/midas/inspec)
122
- ## πŸ‘·β€β™‚οΈ Training procedure
123
- The model is fine-tuned as a token classification problem where the text is labeled using the BIO scheme.
124
- - B => Begin of a keyphrase
125
- - I => Inside of a keyphrase
126
- - O => Ouside of a keyphrase
127
 
128
- For more information, you can take a look at the training notebook.
 
129
 
130
  ### Preprocessing
 
131
  ```python
132
  def preprocess_fuction(all_samples_per_split):
133
  tokenized_samples = tokenizer.batch_encode_plus(
@@ -165,18 +194,11 @@ def preprocess_fuction(all_samples_per_split):
165
  ```
166
  ## πŸ“Evaluation results
167
 
168
- One of the traditional evaluation methods are the precision, recall and F1-score @k,m where k is the number that stands for the first k predicted keyphrases and m for the average amount of predicted keyphrases.
169
  The model achieves the following results on the Inspec test set:
170
 
171
  | Dataset | P@5 | R@5 | F1@5 | P@10 | R@10 | F1@10 | P@M | R@M | F1@M |
172
  |:-----------------:|:----:|:----:|:----:|:----:|:----:|:-----:|:----:|:----:|:----:|
173
  | Inspec Test Set | 0.53 | 0.47 | 0.46 | 0.36 | 0.58 | 0.41 | 0.58 | 0.60 | 0.56 |
174
 
175
- For more information on the evaluation process, you can take a look at the keyphrase extraction evaluation notebook.
176
-
177
- ### Bibliography
178
- Debanjan Mahata, Navneet Agarwal, Dibya Gautam, Amardeep Kumar, Sagar Dhiman, Anish Acharya, & Rajiv Ratn Shah. (2021). LDkp Dataset [Data set]. Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5501744
179
-
180
- Kulkarni, Mayank, Debanjan Mahata, Ravneet Arora, and Rajarshi Bhowmik. "Learning Rich Representation of Keyphrases from Text." arXiv preprint arXiv:2112.08547 (2021).
181
-
182
- Sahrawat, Dhruva, Debanjan Mahata, Haimin Zhang, Mayank Kulkarni, Agniv Sharma, Rakesh Gosangi, Amanda Stent, Yaman Kumar, Rajiv Ratn Shah, and Roger Zimmermann. "Keyphrase extraction as sequence labeling using contextualized embeddings." In European Conference on Information Retrieval, pp. 328-335. Springer, Cham, 2020.
 
8
  - midas/inspec
9
  metrics:
10
  - seqeval
11
+ widget:
12
+ - text: "Keyphrase extraction is a technique in text analysis where you extract the important keyphrases from a text. Since this is a time-consuming process, Artificial Intelligence is used to automate it. Currently, classical machine learning methods, that use statistics and linguistics, are widely used for the extraction process. The fact that these methods have been widely used in the community has the advantage that there are many easy-to-use libraries. Now with the recent innovations in deep learning methods (such as recurrent neural networks and transformers, GANS, …), keyphrase extraction can be improved. These new methods also focus on the semantics and context of a document, which is quite an improvement."
13
+ example_title: "Example 1"
14
+ - text: "In this work, we explore how to learn task specific language models aimed towards learning rich representation of keyphrases from text documents. We experiment with different masking strategies for pre-training transformer language models (LMs) in discriminative as well as generative settings. In the discriminative setting, we introduce a new pre-training objective - Keyphrase Boundary Infilling with Replacement (KBIR), showing large gains in performance (up to 9.26 points in F1) over SOTA, when LM pre-trained using KBIR is fine-tuned for the task of keyphrase extraction. In the generative setting, we introduce a new pre-training setup for BART - KeyBART, that reproduces the keyphrases related to the input text in the CatSeq format, instead of the denoised original input. This also led to gains in performance (up to 4.33 points inF1@M) over SOTA for keyphrase generation. Additionally, we also fine-tune the pre-trained language models on named entity recognition(NER), question answering (QA), relation extraction (RE), abstractive summarization and achieve comparable performance with that of the SOTA, showing that learning rich representation of keyphrases is indeed beneficial for many other fundamental NLP tasks."
15
+ example_title: "Example 2"
16
+ model-index:
17
+ - name: DeDeckerThomas/keyphrase-extraction-kbir-inspec
18
+ results:
19
+ - task:
20
+ type: keyphrase-extraction
21
+ name: Keyphrase Extraction
22
+ dataset:
23
+ type: midas/inspec
24
+ name: inspec
25
+ metrics:
26
+ - type: seqeval
27
+ value: 0.588
28
+ name: F1-score
29
  ---
30
  ** Work in progress **
31
  # πŸ”‘ Keyphrase Extraction model: KBIR-inspec
 
35
 
36
 
37
  ## πŸ““ Model Description
38
+ This model is a fine-tuned KBIR model on the Inspec dataset. KBIR or Keyphrase Boundary Infilling with Replacement is a pre-trained model which utilizes a multi-task learning setup for optimizing a combined loss of Masked Language Modeling (MLM), Keyphrase Boundary Infilling (KBI) and Keyphrase Replacement Classification (KRC).
39
+ You can find more information about the architecture in this paper: https://arxiv.org/abs/2112.08547.
40
+
41
+ The model is fine-tuned as a token classification problem where the text is labeled using the BIO scheme.
42
+
43
+ | Label | Description |
44
+ | ----- | ------------------------------- |
45
+ | B | At the beginning of a keyphrase |
46
+ | I | Inside a keyphrase |
47
+ | O | Outside a keyphrase |
48
+
49
+ Kulkarni, Mayank, Debanjan Mahata, Ravneet Arora, and Rajarshi Bhowmik. "Learning Rich Representation of Keyphrases from Text." arXiv preprint arXiv:2112.08547 (2021).
50
+
51
+ Sahrawat, Dhruva, Debanjan Mahata, Haimin Zhang, Mayank Kulkarni, Agniv Sharma, Rakesh Gosangi, Amanda Stent, Yaman Kumar, Rajiv Ratn Shah, and Roger Zimmermann. "Keyphrase extraction as sequence labeling using contextualized embeddings." In European Conference on Information Retrieval, pp. 328-335. Springer, Cham, 2020.
52
 
53
  ## βœ‹ Intended uses & limitations
54
+ ### πŸ›‘ Limitations
55
+ * This keyphrase extraction model is very domain-specific and will perform very well on abstracts of scientific papers. It's not recommended to use this model for other domains, but you are free to test it out.
56
+ * Only works for English documents.
57
+ * For a custom model, please consult the training notebook for more information (link incoming).
58
+
59
  ### ❓ How to use
60
  ```python
61
  # Define post_process functions
 
147
  'semantics' 'statistics' 'text analysis' 'transformers']
148
  ```
149
 
150
+ ## πŸ“š Training Dataset
151
+ Inspec is a keyphrase extraction/generation dataset consisting of 2000 English scientific papers from the scientific domains of Computers and Control and Information Technology published between 1998 to 2002. The keyphrases are annotated by professional indexers or editors.
 
152
 
153
+ You can find more information here: https://huggingface.co/datasets/midas/inspec
 
 
 
 
 
154
 
155
+ ## πŸ‘·β€β™‚οΈ Training procedure
156
+ For more in detail information, you can take a look at the training notebook (link incoming).
157
 
158
  ### Preprocessing
159
+ The documents in the dataset are already preprocessed into list of words with the corresponding labels. The only thing that must be done is tokenization and the realignment of the labels so that they correspond with the right subword tokens.
160
  ```python
161
  def preprocess_fuction(all_samples_per_split):
162
  tokenized_samples = tokenizer.batch_encode_plus(
 
194
  ```
195
  ## πŸ“Evaluation results
196
 
197
+ One of the traditional evaluation methods is the precision, recall and F1-score @k,m where k is the number that stands for the first k predicted keyphrases and m for the average amount of predicted keyphrases.
198
  The model achieves the following results on the Inspec test set:
199
 
200
  | Dataset | P@5 | R@5 | F1@5 | P@10 | R@10 | F1@10 | P@M | R@M | F1@M |
201
  |:-----------------:|:----:|:----:|:----:|:----:|:----:|:-----:|:----:|:----:|:----:|
202
  | Inspec Test Set | 0.53 | 0.47 | 0.46 | 0.36 | 0.58 | 0.41 | 0.58 | 0.60 | 0.56 |
203
 
204
+ For more information on the evaluation process, you can take a look at the keyphrase extraction evaluation notebook.