Unveiling Downstream Performance Scaling of LLMs: A Clustering-Based Perspective
Abstract
The rapid advancements in computing dramatically increase the scale and cost of training Large Language Models (LLMs). Accurately predicting downstream task performance prior to model training is crucial for efficient resource allocation, yet remains challenging due to two primary constraints: (1) the "emergence phenomenon", wherein downstream performance metrics become meaningful only after extensive training, which limits the ability to use smaller models for prediction; (2) Uneven task difficulty distributions and the absence of consistent scaling laws, resulting in substantial metric variability. Existing performance prediction methods suffer from limited accuracy and reliability, thereby impeding the assessment of potential LLM capabilities. To address these challenges, we propose a Clustering-On-Difficulty (COD) downstream performance prediction framework. COD first constructs a predictable support subset by clustering tasks based on difficulty features, strategically excluding non-emergent and non-scalable clusters. The scores on the selected subset serve as effective intermediate predictors of downstream performance on the full evaluation set. With theoretical support, we derive a mapping function that transforms performance metrics from the predictable subset to the full evaluation set, thereby ensuring accurate extrapolation of LLM downstream performance. The proposed method has been applied to predict performance scaling for a 70B LLM, providing actionable insights for training resource allocation and assisting in monitoring the training process. Notably, COD achieves remarkable predictive accuracy on the 70B LLM by leveraging an ensemble of small models, demonstrating an absolute mean deviation of 1.36% across eight important LLM evaluation benchmarks.
Community
We introduce the Clustering-On-Difficulty (COD) framework to accurately predict the downstream performance of Large Language Models (LLMs), achieving a remarkable absolute mean prediction error of 1.36% in performance scaling for a 70B LLM across 8 key benchmarks.
This is an automated message from the Librarian Bot. I found the following papers similar to this paper.
The following papers were recommended by the Semantic Scholar API
- Scaling Inference-Efficient Language Models (2025)
- Scaling Laws for Upcycling Mixture-of-Experts Language Models (2025)
- Quantifying the Importance of Data Alignment in Downstream Model Performance (2025)
- Scaling Laws for Differentially Private Language Models (2025)
- Model-agnostic Coreset Selection via LLM-based Concept Bottlenecks (2025)
- DFPE: A Diverse Fingerprint Ensemble for Enhancing LLM Performance (2025)
- Predicting Large Language Model Capabilities on Closed-Book QA Tasks Using Only Information Available Prior to Training (2025)
Please give a thumbs up to this comment if you found it helpful!
If you want recommendations for any Paper on Hugging Face checkout this Space
You can directly ask Librarian Bot for paper recommendations by tagging it in a comment:
@librarian-bot
recommend
Models citing this paper 0
No model linking this paper
Datasets citing this paper 0
No dataset linking this paper
Spaces citing this paper 0
No Space linking this paper
Collections including this paper 0
No Collection including this paper