It's fundamentally wrong article. This is because you did not understand what open source means. You are mentioning Llama as open source, while it is not. There are clear definitions of what open source means and you are the one to verify what it is.

Meta’s LLaMa 2 license is not Open Source – Open Source Initiative
https://opensource.org/blog/metas-llama-2-license-is-not-open-source

The Open Source Definition – Open Source Initiative
https://opensource.org/osd

What is Free Software? - GNU Project - Free Software Foundation
https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/free-sw.html

Basically, whatever you speak about open source and lama makes no sense because it is not open source, no matter how much they call it this way.

I am even inclined not to read your article because it makes no sense.

And then you are comparing the non free software and model Llama with the free software Deep Seek. It makes really no sense.

And because this article fundamentally is wrong against all the established terminology and knowledge we have in the free software, free as in freedom, open source means free software, this article makes no sense at all to me, and I don't know what is the purpose of it.

Another small hint for you, not all software, not all information and models on Hugging Face are open source. They are not. There are different licenses.