Join the conversation

Join the community of Machine Learners and AI enthusiasts.

Sign Up
cschroederΒ 
posted an update Sep 9
Post
401
βš–οΈ π€πˆ π“π«πšπ’π§π’π§π  𝐒𝐬 𝐂𝐨𝐩𝐲𝐫𝐒𝐠𝐑𝐭 𝐈𝐧𝐟𝐫𝐒𝐧𝐠𝐞𝐦𝐞𝐧𝐭

This bold claim is not my opinion, but it has been made in a recent "report" of a group, whose stance is recognizable in their name. It is roughly translated as "Authors' Rights Initiative". They published a report which was also presented before the EU Parliament according to the LinkedIn post below.

I am not really interested in politics, but as an EU citizen I am of course somewhat interested in a reasonable and practical version of the EU AI Act. Not saying there should not be rules around data and AI, but this report is obviously very biased towards one side.

While I think the report itself does not deserve attention, I post it in the hope that you find more examples, where they did not address the issue adequately. Feel free to add to my LinkedIn posts (where the original authors will see it) or here.

[en] Executive summary: https://urheber.info/media/pages/diskurs/ai-training-is-copyright-infringement/3b900058e6-1725460935/executive-summary_engl_final_29-08-2024.pdf
[de] Full report: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=4946214

LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/posts/activity-7238912869268959232-6cFx