Update README.md
Browse files
README.md
CHANGED
@@ -20,8 +20,53 @@ tags:
|
|
20 |
- ai-agents
|
21 |
- content-creation
|
22 |
- Agents-MCP-Hackathon
|
|
|
23 |
---
|
24 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25 |
## Functions Available for LLM Calls via MCP
|
26 |
|
27 |
This document outlines the functions available for programmatic invocation by LLMs through the MCP (Multi-Cloud Platform) server, as defined in `mcp-deepfake-forensics/app.py`.
|
|
|
20 |
- ai-agents
|
21 |
- content-creation
|
22 |
- Agents-MCP-Hackathon
|
23 |
+
|
24 |
---
|
25 |
|
26 |
+
# The Detection Dilemma: The Degentic Games
|
27 |
+
|
28 |
+

|
29 |
+
|
30 |
+
The cat-and-mouse game between digital forgery and detection reached a tipping point early last year after years of escalating concern and anxiety. The most ambitious, expensive, and resource-intensive detection model was launched with actually impressive results. Impressive… for an embarassing two to three weeks.
|
31 |
+
|
32 |
+
Then came the knockout punches. New SOTA models emerging every few weeks, in every imaginageable domain -- image, audio, video, music. Generated images are now at a level of realism that to an untrained eye, its unable to discern if its real or fake. [TO-DO: Add Citation to the study]
|
33 |
+
|
34 |
+
And let's be honest: we saw this coming. When has humanity ever resisted accelerating technology that promises... *interesting* applications? As the ancients wisely tweeted: 🔞 drives innovation.
|
35 |
+
|
36 |
+
It's time for a reset. Quit crying and get ready. Didn't you hear? The long awaited Degentic Games is starting soon, and your model sucks.
|
37 |
+
|
38 |
+
## Re-Thinking Detection
|
39 |
+
|
40 |
+
### 1. **Shift away from the belief that more data leads to better results. Rather, focus on insight-driven and "quality over quantity" datasets in training.**
|
41 |
+
* **Move Away from Terabyte-Scale Datasets**: Focus on **quality over quantity** by curating a smaller, highly diverse, and **labeled dataset** emphasizing edge cases and the latest AI generations.
|
42 |
+
* **Active Learning**: Implement active learning techniques to iteratively select the most informative samples for human labeling, reducing dataset size while maintaining effectiveness.
|
43 |
+
|
44 |
+
### 2. **Efficient Model Architectures**
|
45 |
+
* **Adopt Lightweight, State-of-the-Art Models**: Explore models designed for efficiency like MobileNet, EfficientNet, or recent advancements in vision transformers (ViTs) tailored for forensic analysis.
|
46 |
+
* **Transfer Learning with Fine-Tuning**: Leverage pre-trained models fine-tuned on your curated dataset to leverage general knowledge while adapting to specific AI image detection tasks.
|
47 |
+
|
48 |
+
### 3. **Multi-Modal and Hybrid Approaches**
|
49 |
+
* **Combine Image Forensics with Metadata Analysis**: Integrate insights from image processing with metadata (e.g., EXIF, XMP) for a more robust detection framework.
|
50 |
+
* **Incorporate Knowledge Graphs for AI Model Identification**: If feasible, build or utilize knowledge graphs mapping known AI models to their generation signatures for targeted detection.
|
51 |
+
|
52 |
+
### 4. **Continuous Learning and Update Mechanism**
|
53 |
+
* **Online Learning or Incremental Training**: Implement a system that can incrementally update the model with new, strategically selected samples, adapting to new AI generation techniques.
|
54 |
+
* **Community-Driven Updates**: Establish a feedback loop with users/community to report undetected AI images, fueling model updates.
|
55 |
+
|
56 |
+
### 5. **Evaluation and Validation**
|
57 |
+
* **Robust Validation Protocols**: Regularly test against unseen, diverse datasets including novel AI generations not present during training.
|
58 |
+
* **Benchmark Against State-of-the-Art**: Periodically compare performance with newly published detection models or techniques.
|
59 |
+
|
60 |
+
|
61 |
+
### Core Roadmap
|
62 |
+
|
63 |
+
[x] Project Introduction
|
64 |
+
[ ] Agents Released into Wild
|
65 |
+
[ ] Whitepaper / Arxiv Release
|
66 |
+
[ ] Public Participation
|
67 |
+
|
68 |
+
|
69 |
+
|
70 |
## Functions Available for LLM Calls via MCP
|
71 |
|
72 |
This document outlines the functions available for programmatic invocation by LLMs through the MCP (Multi-Cloud Platform) server, as defined in `mcp-deepfake-forensics/app.py`.
|