import os import io import streamlit as st import docx import docx2txt import tempfile import time import re import concurrent.futures from functools import lru_cache from transformers import pipeline, AutoTokenizer, AutoModelForSeq2SeqLM # Set page title and hide sidebar st.set_page_config( page_title="Resume Analyzer and Company Suitability Checker", initial_sidebar_state="collapsed" ) # Hide sidebar completely with custom CSS st.markdown(""" """, unsafe_allow_html=True) ##################################### # Preload Models - Optimized ##################################### @st.cache_resource(show_spinner=True) def load_models(): """Load models at startup - using smaller/faster models""" with st.spinner("Loading AI models... This may take a minute on first run."): models = {} # Load smaller summarization model for speed models['summarizer'] = pipeline("summarization", model="facebook/bart-large-cnn", max_length=130) # Load TinyLlama model for evaluation models['evaluator'] = pipeline( "text-generation", model="TinyLlama/TinyLlama-1.1B-Chat-v1.0", max_new_tokens=200, do_sample=True, temperature=0.7 ) return models # Preload models immediately when app starts models = load_models() ##################################### # Function: Extract Text from File ##################################### @st.cache_data(show_spinner=False) def extract_text_from_file(file_obj): """ Extract text from .docx and .doc files. Returns the extracted text or an error message if extraction fails. """ filename = file_obj.name ext = os.path.splitext(filename)[1].lower() text = "" if ext == ".docx": try: document = docx.Document(file_obj) text = "\n".join(para.text for para in document.paragraphs if para.text.strip()) except Exception as e: text = f"Error processing DOCX file: {e}" elif ext == ".doc": try: # For .doc files, we need to save to a temp file with tempfile.NamedTemporaryFile(delete=False, suffix='.doc') as temp_file: temp_file.write(file_obj.getvalue()) temp_path = temp_file.name # Use docx2txt which is generally faster try: text = docx2txt.process(temp_path) except Exception: text = "Could not process .doc file. Please convert to .docx format." # Clean up temp file os.unlink(temp_path) except Exception as e: text = f"Error processing DOC file: {e}" elif ext == ".txt": try: text = file_obj.getvalue().decode("utf-8") except Exception as e: text = f"Error processing TXT file: {e}" else: text = "Unsupported file type. Please upload a .docx, .doc, or .txt file." return text ##################################### # Functions for Information Extraction - Optimized ##################################### # Cache the extraction functions to avoid reprocessing @lru_cache(maxsize=32) def extract_name(text_start): """Extract candidate name from the beginning of resume text""" # Only use the first 500 characters to speed up processing lines = text_start.split('\n') # Check first few non-empty lines for potential names potential_name_lines = [line.strip() for line in lines[:5] if line.strip()] if potential_name_lines: # First line is often the name if it's short and doesn't contain common headers first_line = potential_name_lines[0] if 5 <= len(first_line) <= 40 and not any(x in first_line.lower() for x in ["resume", "cv", "curriculum", "vitae", "profile"]): return first_line # Look for lines that might contain a name for line in potential_name_lines[:3]: if len(line.split()) <= 4 and not any(x in line.lower() for x in ["address", "phone", "email", "resume", "cv"]): return line return "Unknown (please extract from resume)" def extract_age(text): """Extract candidate age from resume text""" # Simplified: just check a few common patterns age_patterns = [ r'age:?\s*(\d{1,2})', r'(\d{1,2})\s*years\s*old', ] text_lower = text.lower() for pattern in age_patterns: matches = re.search(pattern, text_lower) if matches: return matches.group(1) return "Not specified" def extract_industry(text, base_summary): """Extract expected job industry from resume""" # Simplified industry keywords focused on the most common ones industry_keywords = { "technology": ["software", "programming", "developer", "IT", "tech", "computer"], "finance": ["banking", "financial", "accounting", "finance", "analyst"], "healthcare": ["medical", "health", "hospital", "clinical", "nurse", "doctor"], "education": ["teaching", "teacher", "professor", "education", "university"], "marketing": ["marketing", "advertising", "digital marketing", "social media"], "engineering": ["engineer", "engineering"], "data science": ["data science", "machine learning", "AI", "analytics"], "information systems": ["information systems", "ERP", "systems management"] } # Count occurrences of industry keywords - using the summary to speed up combined_text = base_summary.lower() counts = {} for industry, keywords in industry_keywords.items(): counts[industry] = sum(combined_text.count(keyword.lower()) for keyword in keywords) # Get the industry with the highest count if counts: likely_industry = max(counts.items(), key=lambda x: x[1]) if likely_industry[1] > 0: return likely_industry[0].capitalize() # Check for educational background that might indicate industry degrees = ["computer science", "business", "engineering", "medicine", "education", "finance", "marketing"] for degree in degrees: if degree in combined_text: return f"{degree.capitalize()}-related field" return "Not clearly specified" def extract_skills_and_work(text): """Extract both skills and work experience at once to save processing time""" # Common skill categories - reduced keyword list for speed skill_categories = { "Programming": ["Python", "Java", "JavaScript", "HTML", "CSS", "SQL", "C++", "C#"], "Data Science": ["Machine Learning", "Data Analysis", "Statistics", "TensorFlow", "PyTorch"], "Database": ["SQL", "MySQL", "MongoDB", "Database"], "Web Development": ["React", "Angular", "Node.js", "Frontend", "Backend"], "Software Development": ["Agile", "Scrum", "Git", "DevOps", "Docker"], "Cloud": ["AWS", "Azure", "Google Cloud", "Cloud"], "Business": ["Project Management", "Business Analysis", "Leadership"], "Tools": ["Excel", "PowerPoint", "Tableau", "Power BI", "JIRA"] } # Work experience extraction work_headers = [ "work experience", "professional experience", "employment history", "work history", "experience" ] next_section_headers = [ "education", "skills", "certifications", "projects", "achievements" ] # Process everything at once lines = text.split('\n') text_lower = text.lower() # Skills extraction found_skills = [] for category, skills in skill_categories.items(): category_skills = [] for skill in skills: if skill.lower() in text_lower: category_skills.append(skill) if category_skills: found_skills.append(f"{category}: {', '.join(category_skills)}") # Work experience extraction - simplified approach work_section = [] in_work_section = False for idx, line in enumerate(lines): line_lower = line.lower().strip() # Start of work section if not in_work_section: if any(header in line_lower for header in work_headers): in_work_section = True continue # End of work section elif in_work_section: if any(header in line_lower for header in next_section_headers): break if line.strip(): work_section.append(line.strip()) # Simplified work formatting if not work_section: work_experience = "Work experience not clearly identified" else: # Just take the first 5-7 lines of the work section as a summary work_lines = [] company_count = 0 current_company = "" for line in work_section: # New company entry often has a date if re.search(r'(19|20)\d{2}', line): company_count += 1 if company_count <= 3: # Limit to 3 most recent positions current_company = line work_lines.append(f"**{line}**") else: break elif company_count <= 3 and len(work_lines) < 10: # Limit total lines work_lines.append(line) work_experience = "\n• " + "\n• ".join(work_lines[:7]) if work_lines else "Work experience not clearly structured" skills_formatted = "\n• " + "\n• ".join(found_skills) if found_skills else "No specific technical skills clearly identified" return skills_formatted, work_experience ##################################### # Function: Summarize Resume Text - Optimized ##################################### def summarize_resume_text(resume_text): """ Generates a structured summary of the resume text - optimized for speed """ start_time = time.time() # First, generate a quick summary using pre-loaded model max_input_length = 1024 # Model limit # Only summarize the first portion of text for speed text_to_summarize = resume_text[:min(len(resume_text), max_input_length)] base_summary = models['summarizer'](text_to_summarize)[0]['summary_text'] # Extract information in parallel where possible with concurrent.futures.ThreadPoolExecutor() as executor: # These can run in parallel name_future = executor.submit(extract_name, resume_text[:500]) # Only use start of text age_future = executor.submit(extract_age, resume_text) industry_future = executor.submit(extract_industry, resume_text, base_summary) skills_work_future = executor.submit(extract_skills_and_work, resume_text) # Get results name = name_future.result() age = age_future.result() industry = industry_future.result() skills, work_experience = skills_work_future.result() # Format the structured summary formatted_summary = f"Name: {name}\n" formatted_summary += f"Age: {age}\n" formatted_summary += f"Expected Job Industry: {industry}\n\n" formatted_summary += f"Previous Work Experience: {work_experience}\n\n" formatted_summary += f"Skills: {skills}" execution_time = time.time() - start_time return formatted_summary, execution_time ##################################### # Function: Evaluate with TinyLlama ##################################### @st.cache_data(show_spinner=False) def evaluate_with_tiny_llama(candidate_summary, company_info, _evaluator=None): """ Use TinyLlama to evaluate the match between a candidate's resume and company requirements. """ start_time = time.time() evaluator = _evaluator or models['evaluator'] # Format the chat prompt for TinyLlama's chat format prompt = f"""<|im_start|>system You are an expert HR recruiter. Your task is to evaluate how well a candidate's profile matches with a company's requirements. Be concise but thorough in your evaluation. <|im_end|> <|im_start|>user I need to evaluate a job candidate against company requirements. Please: 1. Analyze the match between the candidate and the position 2. Give a suitability score from 0-100 3. Provide 2-3 sentences explaining your evaluation 4. List the top 3 strengths of the candidate for this role 5. List 1-2 potential gaps if any Candidate Profile: {candidate_summary} Company Requirements: {company_info} <|im_end|> <|im_start|>assistant """ # Generate the response response = evaluator(prompt)[0]['generated_text'] # Extract just the assistant's response after the prompt assistant_response_start = response.find("<|im_start|>assistant") + len("<|im_start|>assistant") assistant_response = response[assistant_response_start:].strip() # Remove any trailing tag if present if "<|im_end|>" in assistant_response: assistant_response = assistant_response.split("<|im_end|>")[0].strip() # Try to extract the score from the response score_match = re.search(r'(\d{1,3})/100|score:?\s*(\d{1,3})|rating:?\s*(\d{1,3})|suitability:?\s*(\d{1,3})', assistant_response.lower()) if score_match: # Find the first group that matched and isn't None for group in score_match.groups(): if group is not None: score = int(group) normalized_score = min(100, max(0, score)) / 100 # Ensure it's in 0-1 range break else: normalized_score = 0.5 # Default if no group was extracted else: # If no explicit score, try to infer from sentiments positive_words = ['excellent', 'perfect', 'outstanding', 'ideal', 'great'] negative_words = ['poor', 'inadequate', 'insufficient', 'lacks', 'mismatch'] positive_count = sum(assistant_response.lower().count(word) for word in positive_words) negative_count = sum(assistant_response.lower().count(word) for word in negative_words) if positive_count > negative_count * 2: normalized_score = 0.85 elif positive_count > negative_count: normalized_score = 0.7 elif negative_count > positive_count * 2: normalized_score = 0.3 elif negative_count > positive_count: normalized_score = 0.4 else: normalized_score = 0.5 execution_time = time.time() - start_time return normalized_score, assistant_response, execution_time ##################################### # Main Streamlit Interface - with Progress Reporting ##################################### st.title("Resume Analyzer and Company Suitability Checker") st.markdown( """ Upload your resume file in **.docx**, **.doc**, or **.txt** format. The app performs the following tasks: 1. Extracts text from the resume. 2. Uses AI to generate a structured candidate summary with name, age, expected job industry, previous work experience, and skills. 3. Uses TinyLlama AI to evaluate the candidate's suitability for the company and provide detailed feedback. """ ) # File uploader uploaded_file = st.file_uploader("Upload your resume (.docx, .doc, or .txt)", type=["docx", "doc", "txt"]) # Company description text area company_prompt = st.text_area( "Enter the company description or job requirements:", height=150, help="Enter a detailed description of the company culture, role requirements, and desired skills.", ) # Process button with optimized flow if uploaded_file is not None and company_prompt and st.button("Analyze Resume"): # Create a placeholder for the progress bar progress_bar = st.progress(0) status_text = st.empty() # Step 1: Extract text status_text.text("Step 1/3: Extracting text from resume...") resume_text = extract_text_from_file(uploaded_file) progress_bar.progress(25) if resume_text.startswith("Error") or resume_text == "Unsupported file type. Please upload a .docx, .doc, or .txt file.": st.error(resume_text) else: # Step 2: Generate summary status_text.text("Step 2/3: Analyzing resume and generating summary...") summary, summarization_time = summarize_resume_text(resume_text) progress_bar.progress(75) # Display summary st.subheader("Candidate Summary") st.markdown(summary) st.info(f"Summary generated in {summarization_time:.2f} seconds") # Step 3: Evaluate with TinyLlama status_text.text("Step 3/3: Evaluating candidate with TinyLlama...") suitability_score, evaluation, evaluation_time = evaluate_with_tiny_llama( summary, company_prompt, _evaluator=models['evaluator'] ) progress_bar.progress(100) # Clear status messages status_text.empty() # Display suitability results st.subheader("Suitability Assessment") # Display score with appropriate color score_percent = int(suitability_score * 100) if suitability_score >= 0.85: st.success(f"**Matching Score:** {score_percent}%") elif suitability_score >= 0.70: st.success(f"**Matching Score:** {score_percent}%") elif suitability_score >= 0.50: st.warning(f"**Matching Score:** {score_percent}%") else: st.error(f"**Matching Score:** {score_percent}%") # Display the full evaluation st.markdown("### Detailed Evaluation") st.markdown(evaluation) st.info(f"Evaluation completed in {evaluation_time:.2f} seconds using TinyLlama")