Spaces:
Sleeping
Sleeping
File size: 22,486 Bytes
ffaa9fc |
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468 469 470 471 472 473 474 475 476 477 478 479 480 481 482 483 484 485 486 487 488 489 490 491 492 493 494 495 496 497 498 499 500 |
#
# Copyright (c) 2012-2017 The ANTLR Project. All rights reserved.
# Use of this file is governed by the BSD 3-clause license that
# can be found in the LICENSE.txt file in the project root.
#
#
# This enumeration defines the prediction modes available in ANTLR 4 along with
# utility methods for analyzing configuration sets for conflicts and/or
# ambiguities.
from enum import Enum
from antlr4.atn.ATN import ATN
from antlr4.atn.ATNConfig import ATNConfig
from antlr4.atn.ATNConfigSet import ATNConfigSet
from antlr4.atn.ATNState import RuleStopState
from antlr4.atn.SemanticContext import SemanticContext
PredictionMode = None
class PredictionMode(Enum):
#
# The SLL(*) prediction mode. This prediction mode ignores the current
# parser context when making predictions. This is the fastest prediction
# mode, and provides correct results for many grammars. This prediction
# mode is more powerful than the prediction mode provided by ANTLR 3, but
# may result in syntax errors for grammar and input combinations which are
# not SLL.
#
# <p>
# When using this prediction mode, the parser will either return a correct
# parse tree (i.e. the same parse tree that would be returned with the
# {@link #LL} prediction mode), or it will report a syntax error. If a
# syntax error is encountered when using the {@link #SLL} prediction mode,
# it may be due to either an actual syntax error in the input or indicate
# that the particular combination of grammar and input requires the more
# powerful {@link #LL} prediction abilities to complete successfully.</p>
#
# <p>
# This prediction mode does not provide any guarantees for prediction
# behavior for syntactically-incorrect inputs.</p>
#
SLL = 0
#
# The LL(*) prediction mode. This prediction mode allows the current parser
# context to be used for resolving SLL conflicts that occur during
# prediction. This is the fastest prediction mode that guarantees correct
# parse results for all combinations of grammars with syntactically correct
# inputs.
#
# <p>
# When using this prediction mode, the parser will make correct decisions
# for all syntactically-correct grammar and input combinations. However, in
# cases where the grammar is truly ambiguous this prediction mode might not
# report a precise answer for <em>exactly which</em> alternatives are
# ambiguous.</p>
#
# <p>
# This prediction mode does not provide any guarantees for prediction
# behavior for syntactically-incorrect inputs.</p>
#
LL = 1
#
# The LL(*) prediction mode with exact ambiguity detection. In addition to
# the correctness guarantees provided by the {@link #LL} prediction mode,
# this prediction mode instructs the prediction algorithm to determine the
# complete and exact set of ambiguous alternatives for every ambiguous
# decision encountered while parsing.
#
# <p>
# This prediction mode may be used for diagnosing ambiguities during
# grammar development. Due to the performance overhead of calculating sets
# of ambiguous alternatives, this prediction mode should be avoided when
# the exact results are not necessary.</p>
#
# <p>
# This prediction mode does not provide any guarantees for prediction
# behavior for syntactically-incorrect inputs.</p>
#
LL_EXACT_AMBIG_DETECTION = 2
#
# Computes the SLL prediction termination condition.
#
# <p>
# This method computes the SLL prediction termination condition for both of
# the following cases.</p>
#
# <ul>
# <li>The usual SLL+LL fallback upon SLL conflict</li>
# <li>Pure SLL without LL fallback</li>
# </ul>
#
# <p><strong>COMBINED SLL+LL PARSING</strong></p>
#
# <p>When LL-fallback is enabled upon SLL conflict, correct predictions are
# ensured regardless of how the termination condition is computed by this
# method. Due to the substantially higher cost of LL prediction, the
# prediction should only fall back to LL when the additional lookahead
# cannot lead to a unique SLL prediction.</p>
#
# <p>Assuming combined SLL+LL parsing, an SLL configuration set with only
# conflicting subsets should fall back to full LL, even if the
# configuration sets don't resolve to the same alternative (e.g.
# {@code {1,2}} and {@code {3,4}}. If there is at least one non-conflicting
# configuration, SLL could continue with the hopes that more lookahead will
# resolve via one of those non-conflicting configurations.</p>
#
# <p>Here's the prediction termination rule them: SLL (for SLL+LL parsing)
# stops when it sees only conflicting configuration subsets. In contrast,
# full LL keeps going when there is uncertainty.</p>
#
# <p><strong>HEURISTIC</strong></p>
#
# <p>As a heuristic, we stop prediction when we see any conflicting subset
# unless we see a state that only has one alternative associated with it.
# The single-alt-state thing lets prediction continue upon rules like
# (otherwise, it would admit defeat too soon):</p>
#
# <p>{@code [12|1|[], 6|2|[], 12|2|[]]. s : (ID | ID ID?) ';' ;}</p>
#
# <p>When the ATN simulation reaches the state before {@code ';'}, it has a
# DFA state that looks like: {@code [12|1|[], 6|2|[], 12|2|[]]}. Naturally
# {@code 12|1|[]} and {@code 12|2|[]} conflict, but we cannot stop
# processing this node because alternative to has another way to continue,
# via {@code [6|2|[]]}.</p>
#
# <p>It also let's us continue for this rule:</p>
#
# <p>{@code [1|1|[], 1|2|[], 8|3|[]] a : A | A | A B ;}</p>
#
# <p>After matching input A, we reach the stop state for rule A, state 1.
# State 8 is the state right before B. Clearly alternatives 1 and 2
# conflict and no amount of further lookahead will separate the two.
# However, alternative 3 will be able to continue and so we do not stop
# working on this state. In the previous example, we're concerned with
# states associated with the conflicting alternatives. Here alt 3 is not
# associated with the conflicting configs, but since we can continue
# looking for input reasonably, don't declare the state done.</p>
#
# <p><strong>PURE SLL PARSING</strong></p>
#
# <p>To handle pure SLL parsing, all we have to do is make sure that we
# combine stack contexts for configurations that differ only by semantic
# predicate. From there, we can do the usual SLL termination heuristic.</p>
#
# <p><strong>PREDICATES IN SLL+LL PARSING</strong></p>
#
# <p>SLL decisions don't evaluate predicates until after they reach DFA stop
# states because they need to create the DFA cache that works in all
# semantic situations. In contrast, full LL evaluates predicates collected
# during start state computation so it can ignore predicates thereafter.
# This means that SLL termination detection can totally ignore semantic
# predicates.</p>
#
# <p>Implementation-wise, {@link ATNConfigSet} combines stack contexts but not
# semantic predicate contexts so we might see two configurations like the
# following.</p>
#
# <p>{@code (s, 1, x, {}), (s, 1, x', {p})}</p>
#
# <p>Before testing these configurations against others, we have to merge
# {@code x} and {@code x'} (without modifying the existing configurations).
# For example, we test {@code (x+x')==x''} when looking for conflicts in
# the following configurations.</p>
#
# <p>{@code (s, 1, x, {}), (s, 1, x', {p}), (s, 2, x'', {})}</p>
#
# <p>If the configuration set has predicates (as indicated by
# {@link ATNConfigSet#hasSemanticContext}), this algorithm makes a copy of
# the configurations to strip out all of the predicates so that a standard
# {@link ATNConfigSet} will merge everything ignoring predicates.</p>
#
@classmethod
def hasSLLConflictTerminatingPrediction(cls, mode:PredictionMode, configs:ATNConfigSet):
# Configs in rule stop states indicate reaching the end of the decision
# rule (local context) or end of start rule (full context). If all
# configs meet this condition, then none of the configurations is able
# to match additional input so we terminate prediction.
#
if cls.allConfigsInRuleStopStates(configs):
return True
# pure SLL mode parsing
if mode == PredictionMode.SLL:
# Don't bother with combining configs from different semantic
# contexts if we can fail over to full LL; costs more time
# since we'll often fail over anyway.
if configs.hasSemanticContext:
# dup configs, tossing out semantic predicates
dup = ATNConfigSet()
for c in configs:
c = ATNConfig(config=c, semantic=SemanticContext.NONE)
dup.add(c)
configs = dup
# now we have combined contexts for configs with dissimilar preds
# pure SLL or combined SLL+LL mode parsing
altsets = cls.getConflictingAltSubsets(configs)
return cls.hasConflictingAltSet(altsets) and not cls.hasStateAssociatedWithOneAlt(configs)
# Checks if any configuration in {@code configs} is in a
# {@link RuleStopState}. Configurations meeting this condition have reached
# the end of the decision rule (local context) or end of start rule (full
# context).
#
# @param configs the configuration set to test
# @return {@code true} if any configuration in {@code configs} is in a
# {@link RuleStopState}, otherwise {@code false}
@classmethod
def hasConfigInRuleStopState(cls, configs:ATNConfigSet):
return any(isinstance(cfg.state, RuleStopState) for cfg in configs)
# Checks if all configurations in {@code configs} are in a
# {@link RuleStopState}. Configurations meeting this condition have reached
# the end of the decision rule (local context) or end of start rule (full
# context).
#
# @param configs the configuration set to test
# @return {@code true} if all configurations in {@code configs} are in a
# {@link RuleStopState}, otherwise {@code false}
@classmethod
def allConfigsInRuleStopStates(cls, configs:ATNConfigSet):
return all(isinstance(cfg.state, RuleStopState) for cfg in configs)
#
# Full LL prediction termination.
#
# <p>Can we stop looking ahead during ATN simulation or is there some
# uncertainty as to which alternative we will ultimately pick, after
# consuming more input? Even if there are partial conflicts, we might know
# that everything is going to resolve to the same minimum alternative. That
# means we can stop since no more lookahead will change that fact. On the
# other hand, there might be multiple conflicts that resolve to different
# minimums. That means we need more look ahead to decide which of those
# alternatives we should predict.</p>
#
# <p>The basic idea is to split the set of configurations {@code C}, into
# conflicting subsets {@code (s, _, ctx, _)} and singleton subsets with
# non-conflicting configurations. Two configurations conflict if they have
# identical {@link ATNConfig#state} and {@link ATNConfig#context} values
# but different {@link ATNConfig#alt} value, e.g. {@code (s, i, ctx, _)}
# and {@code (s, j, ctx, _)} for {@code i!=j}.</p>
#
# <p>Reduce these configuration subsets to the set of possible alternatives.
# You can compute the alternative subsets in one pass as follows:</p>
#
# <p>{@code A_s,ctx = {i | (s, i, ctx, _)}} for each configuration in
# {@code C} holding {@code s} and {@code ctx} fixed.</p>
#
# <p>Or in pseudo-code, for each configuration {@code c} in {@code C}:</p>
#
# <pre>
# map[c] U= c.{@link ATNConfig#alt alt} # map hash/equals uses s and x, not
# alt and not pred
# </pre>
#
# <p>The values in {@code map} are the set of {@code A_s,ctx} sets.</p>
#
# <p>If {@code |A_s,ctx|=1} then there is no conflict associated with
# {@code s} and {@code ctx}.</p>
#
# <p>Reduce the subsets to singletons by choosing a minimum of each subset. If
# the union of these alternative subsets is a singleton, then no amount of
# more lookahead will help us. We will always pick that alternative. If,
# however, there is more than one alternative, then we are uncertain which
# alternative to predict and must continue looking for resolution. We may
# or may not discover an ambiguity in the future, even if there are no
# conflicting subsets this round.</p>
#
# <p>The biggest sin is to terminate early because it means we've made a
# decision but were uncertain as to the eventual outcome. We haven't used
# enough lookahead. On the other hand, announcing a conflict too late is no
# big deal; you will still have the conflict. It's just inefficient. It
# might even look until the end of file.</p>
#
# <p>No special consideration for semantic predicates is required because
# predicates are evaluated on-the-fly for full LL prediction, ensuring that
# no configuration contains a semantic context during the termination
# check.</p>
#
# <p><strong>CONFLICTING CONFIGS</strong></p>
#
# <p>Two configurations {@code (s, i, x)} and {@code (s, j, x')}, conflict
# when {@code i!=j} but {@code x=x'}. Because we merge all
# {@code (s, i, _)} configurations together, that means that there are at
# most {@code n} configurations associated with state {@code s} for
# {@code n} possible alternatives in the decision. The merged stacks
# complicate the comparison of configuration contexts {@code x} and
# {@code x'}. Sam checks to see if one is a subset of the other by calling
# merge and checking to see if the merged result is either {@code x} or
# {@code x'}. If the {@code x} associated with lowest alternative {@code i}
# is the superset, then {@code i} is the only possible prediction since the
# others resolve to {@code min(i)} as well. However, if {@code x} is
# associated with {@code j>i} then at least one stack configuration for
# {@code j} is not in conflict with alternative {@code i}. The algorithm
# should keep going, looking for more lookahead due to the uncertainty.</p>
#
# <p>For simplicity, I'm doing a equality check between {@code x} and
# {@code x'} that lets the algorithm continue to consume lookahead longer
# than necessary. The reason I like the equality is of course the
# simplicity but also because that is the test you need to detect the
# alternatives that are actually in conflict.</p>
#
# <p><strong>CONTINUE/STOP RULE</strong></p>
#
# <p>Continue if union of resolved alternative sets from non-conflicting and
# conflicting alternative subsets has more than one alternative. We are
# uncertain about which alternative to predict.</p>
#
# <p>The complete set of alternatives, {@code [i for (_,i,_)]}, tells us which
# alternatives are still in the running for the amount of input we've
# consumed at this point. The conflicting sets let us to strip away
# configurations that won't lead to more states because we resolve
# conflicts to the configuration with a minimum alternate for the
# conflicting set.</p>
#
# <p><strong>CASES</strong></p>
#
# <ul>
#
# <li>no conflicts and more than 1 alternative in set => continue</li>
#
# <li> {@code (s, 1, x)}, {@code (s, 2, x)}, {@code (s, 3, z)},
# {@code (s', 1, y)}, {@code (s', 2, y)} yields non-conflicting set
# {@code {3}} U conflicting sets {@code min({1,2})} U {@code min({1,2})} =
# {@code {1,3}} => continue
# </li>
#
# <li>{@code (s, 1, x)}, {@code (s, 2, x)}, {@code (s', 1, y)},
# {@code (s', 2, y)}, {@code (s'', 1, z)} yields non-conflicting set
# {@code {1}} U conflicting sets {@code min({1,2})} U {@code min({1,2})} =
# {@code {1}} => stop and predict 1</li>
#
# <li>{@code (s, 1, x)}, {@code (s, 2, x)}, {@code (s', 1, y)},
# {@code (s', 2, y)} yields conflicting, reduced sets {@code {1}} U
# {@code {1}} = {@code {1}} => stop and predict 1, can announce
# ambiguity {@code {1,2}}</li>
#
# <li>{@code (s, 1, x)}, {@code (s, 2, x)}, {@code (s', 2, y)},
# {@code (s', 3, y)} yields conflicting, reduced sets {@code {1}} U
# {@code {2}} = {@code {1,2}} => continue</li>
#
# <li>{@code (s, 1, x)}, {@code (s, 2, x)}, {@code (s', 3, y)},
# {@code (s', 4, y)} yields conflicting, reduced sets {@code {1}} U
# {@code {3}} = {@code {1,3}} => continue</li>
#
# </ul>
#
# <p><strong>EXACT AMBIGUITY DETECTION</strong></p>
#
# <p>If all states report the same conflicting set of alternatives, then we
# know we have the exact ambiguity set.</p>
#
# <p><code>|A_<em>i</em>|>1</code> and
# <code>A_<em>i</em> = A_<em>j</em></code> for all <em>i</em>, <em>j</em>.</p>
#
# <p>In other words, we continue examining lookahead until all {@code A_i}
# have more than one alternative and all {@code A_i} are the same. If
# {@code A={{1,2}, {1,3}}}, then regular LL prediction would terminate
# because the resolved set is {@code {1}}. To determine what the real
# ambiguity is, we have to know whether the ambiguity is between one and
# two or one and three so we keep going. We can only stop prediction when
# we need exact ambiguity detection when the sets look like
# {@code A={{1,2}}} or {@code {{1,2},{1,2}}}, etc...</p>
#
@classmethod
def resolvesToJustOneViableAlt(cls, altsets:list):
return cls.getSingleViableAlt(altsets)
#
# Determines if every alternative subset in {@code altsets} contains more
# than one alternative.
#
# @param altsets a collection of alternative subsets
# @return {@code true} if every {@link BitSet} in {@code altsets} has
# {@link BitSet#cardinality cardinality} > 1, otherwise {@code false}
#
@classmethod
def allSubsetsConflict(cls, altsets:list):
return not cls.hasNonConflictingAltSet(altsets)
#
# Determines if any single alternative subset in {@code altsets} contains
# exactly one alternative.
#
# @param altsets a collection of alternative subsets
# @return {@code true} if {@code altsets} contains a {@link BitSet} with
# {@link BitSet#cardinality cardinality} 1, otherwise {@code false}
#
@classmethod
def hasNonConflictingAltSet(cls, altsets:list):
return any(len(alts) == 1 for alts in altsets)
#
# Determines if any single alternative subset in {@code altsets} contains
# more than one alternative.
#
# @param altsets a collection of alternative subsets
# @return {@code true} if {@code altsets} contains a {@link BitSet} with
# {@link BitSet#cardinality cardinality} > 1, otherwise {@code false}
#
@classmethod
def hasConflictingAltSet(cls, altsets:list):
return any(len(alts) > 1 for alts in altsets)
#
# Determines if every alternative subset in {@code altsets} is equivalent.
#
# @param altsets a collection of alternative subsets
# @return {@code true} if every member of {@code altsets} is equal to the
# others, otherwise {@code false}
#
@classmethod
def allSubsetsEqual(cls, altsets:list):
if not altsets:
return True
first = next(iter(altsets))
return all(alts == first for alts in iter(altsets))
#
# Returns the unique alternative predicted by all alternative subsets in
# {@code altsets}. If no such alternative exists, this method returns
# {@link ATN#INVALID_ALT_NUMBER}.
#
# @param altsets a collection of alternative subsets
#
@classmethod
def getUniqueAlt(cls, altsets:list):
all = cls.getAlts(altsets)
if len(all)==1:
return next(iter(all))
return ATN.INVALID_ALT_NUMBER
# Gets the complete set of represented alternatives for a collection of
# alternative subsets. This method returns the union of each {@link BitSet}
# in {@code altsets}.
#
# @param altsets a collection of alternative subsets
# @return the set of represented alternatives in {@code altsets}
#
@classmethod
def getAlts(cls, altsets:list):
return set.union(*altsets)
#
# This function gets the conflicting alt subsets from a configuration set.
# For each configuration {@code c} in {@code configs}:
#
# <pre>
# map[c] U= c.{@link ATNConfig#alt alt} # map hash/equals uses s and x, not
# alt and not pred
# </pre>
#
@classmethod
def getConflictingAltSubsets(cls, configs:ATNConfigSet):
configToAlts = dict()
for c in configs:
h = hash((c.state.stateNumber, c.context))
alts = configToAlts.get(h, None)
if alts is None:
alts = set()
configToAlts[h] = alts
alts.add(c.alt)
return configToAlts.values()
#
# Get a map from state to alt subset from a configuration set. For each
# configuration {@code c} in {@code configs}:
#
# <pre>
# map[c.{@link ATNConfig#state state}] U= c.{@link ATNConfig#alt alt}
# </pre>
#
@classmethod
def getStateToAltMap(cls, configs:ATNConfigSet):
m = dict()
for c in configs:
alts = m.get(c.state, None)
if alts is None:
alts = set()
m[c.state] = alts
alts.add(c.alt)
return m
@classmethod
def hasStateAssociatedWithOneAlt(cls, configs:ATNConfigSet):
return any(len(alts) == 1 for alts in cls.getStateToAltMap(configs).values())
@classmethod
def getSingleViableAlt(cls, altsets:list):
viableAlts = set()
for alts in altsets:
minAlt = min(alts)
viableAlts.add(minAlt)
if len(viableAlts)>1 : # more than 1 viable alt
return ATN.INVALID_ALT_NUMBER
return min(viableAlts)
|