Toxiclassifier / test.csv
dp92's picture
Update test.csv
6a5e2c1
id comment_text
00001cee341fdb12 Yo bitch Ja Rule is more succesful then you'll ever be whats up with you and hating you sad mofuckas...i should bitch slap ur pethedic white faces and get you to kiss my ass you guys sicken me. Ja rule is about pride in da music man. dont diss that shit on him. and nothin is wrong bein like tupac he was a brother too...fuckin white boys get things right next time.,
0000247867823ef7 "== From RfC ==
The title is fine as it is, IMO."
00013b17ad220c46 ""
== Sources ==
* Zawe Ashton on Lapland — / ""
00017563c3f7919a :If you have a look back at the source, the information I updated was the correct form. I can only guess the source hadn't updated. I shall update the information once again but thank you for your message.
00017695ad8997eb I don't anonymously edit articles at all.
0001ea8717f6de06 Thank you for understanding. I think very highly of you and would not revert without discussion.
00024115d4cbde0f Please do not add nonsense to Wikipedia. Such edits are considered vandalism and quickly undone. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox instead. Thank you. -
000247e83dcc1211 :Dear god this site is horrible.
00025358d4737918 ""
Only a fool can believe in such numbers.
The correct number lies between 10 000 to 15 000.
Ponder the numbers carefully.
This error will persist for a long time as it continues to reproduce... The latest reproduction I know is from ENCYCLOPÆDIA BRITANNICA ALMANAC 2008 wich states
Magnittude: 8.7 (fair enough)
victims: 70 000 (today 10 000 to 15 000 is not ""a lot"" so I guess people just come out with a number that impresses enough, I don't know. But I know this: it's just a shameless lucky number that they throw in the air.
GC
""
00026d1092fe71cc "== Double Redirects ==
When fixing double redirects, don't just blank the outer one, you need edit it to point it to the final target, unless you think it's inappropriate, in which case, it needs to be nominated at WP:RfD"
0002eadc3b301559 I think its crap that the link to roggenbier is to this article. Somebody that knows how to do things should change it.
0002f87b16116a7f ""::: Somebody will invariably try to add Religion? Really?? You mean, the way people have invariably kept adding ""Religion"" to the Samuel Beckett infobox? And why do you bother bringing up the long-dead completely non-existent ""Influences"" issue? You're just flailing, making up crap on the fly.
::: For comparison, the only explicit acknowledgement in the entire Amos Oz article that he is personally Jewish is in the categories!
""
0003806b11932181 ", 25 February 2010 (UTC)
:::Looking it over, it's clear that (a banned sockpuppet of ) ignored the consensus (&, fwiw, policy-appropriate) choice to leave the page at Chihuahua (Mexico) and the current page should be returned there. Anyone have the time to fix the incoming links? - 18:24"
0003e1cccfd5a40a ""
It says it right there that it IS a type. The ""Type"" of institution is needed in this case because there are three levels of SUNY schools:
-University Centers and Doctoral Granting Institutions
-State Colleges
-Community Colleges.
It is needed in this case to clarify that UB is a SUNY Center. It says it even in Binghamton University, University at Albany, State University of New York, and Stony Brook University. Stop trying to say it's not because I am totally right in this case.""
00059ace3e3e9a53 ""
== Before adding a new product to the list, make sure it's relevant ==
Before adding a new product to the list, make sure it has a wikipedia entry already, ""proving"" it's relevance and giving the reader the possibility to read more about it.
Otherwise it could be subject to deletion. See this article's revision history.""
000634272d0d44eb "==Current Position==
Anyone have confirmation that Sir, Alfred is no longer at the airport and is hospitalised?"
000663aff0fffc80 this other one from 1897
000689dd34e20979 "== Reason for banning throwing ==
This article needs a section on /why/ throwing is banned. At the moment, to a non-cricket fan, it seems kind of arbitrary."
000834769115370c :: Wallamoose was changing the cited material to say things the original source did not say. In response to his objections, I modified the article as we went along. I was not just reverting him. I repeatedly asked him to use the talk page. I've been trying to add to the article for a long time. It's so thin on content. This is wrong.
000844b52dee5f3f |blocked]] from editing Wikipedia. |
00084da5d4ead7aa "==Indefinitely blocked==
I have indefinitely blocked this account."
00091c35fa9d0465 "== Arabs are committing genocide in Iraq, but no protests in Europe. ==
May Europe also burn in hell."
000968ce11f5ee34 Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Homosexuality, you will be blocked from editing.
0009734200a85047 "== Energy ==
I have edited the introduction, because previously it said that passive transport does not use any kind of energy. This is not true. Passive transport relies on the kinetic energy of the substance that is being transported. This kinetic energy is what causes it to move around and (by random chance) cross the membrane. The difference is that active transport actually uses the cell's energy (ATP or electrochemical gradient) to pump the substance across the membrane."
00097b6214686db5 :yeah, thanks for reviving the tradition of pissing all over articles because you want to live out your ethnic essentialism. Why let mere facts get into the way of enjoying that.
0009aef4bd9e1697 "MLM Software,NBFC software,Non Banking Financial Company,NBFC software company,NBFC software in india,software for banking,Gold loan software.MLM Software
'''SEO Services
Search Engine Optimization
www.liveindiatech.com
According to a recenBold textt survey people have moved away from searching print media for their needs. They use search engines to find the products and services. The first step to have a successful presence over the internet is creating your own website but that is not enough. When someone searches for the products/services that you offer your name needs to be listed high in the search engine.
Live India Tech guarantees you search engine optimization using which your organizations name will feature in the top ten listing in all the search engines. This will ensure that the traffic to your site will increase exponentially aiding you in the sales of more products and services.
We have invested enough resources to develop an SEO system that is far superior to anything else in the market.
www.liveindiatech.com"
000a02d807ae0254 @RedSlash, cut it short. If you have sources stating the RoK is sovereign post them. Otherwise please aknowledge WP is not the place to make OR.
000a6c6d4e89b9bc "====================
Deception is the way of the Ninja.....
Hence, Frank Dux is an amazing Ninja"
000bafe2080bba82 ".
Jews are not a race because you can only get it from your mother. Your own mention of Ethiopian Jews not testing
as Jews proves it is not, as well as the fact that we accept converts"
000bf0a9894b2807 :::If Ollie or others think that one list of the oldest people we know about is too long, the easy answer is to raise the cutoff age. 110 is purely a round number and a full 12 years shorter then the record. We can make it the top 1000 or top 500 or everyone above 115 - tell us what the maximum list size is and we can set a threshold.
000c50dceb1eed2b ""
*Support Per Jimbo and WP:google ""Climatic Research Unit email controversy"" =4,930 results, ""climategate"" =3,210,000 results. MFA
""
000c9b92318552d1 Professors to the Manhatten Project.
000ce41d86f2b886 :::::I have added more wikilinks to my sections and included more secondary sources as you suggested. For all the citations under human disease section, I went through them and exchanged review articles for the primary sources. Thanks again for all your input!
000cf60dbaed8c02 ""
:Not sure whether this is notable enough to be mentioned in the article, but you're right – versions later than 6 (2001) can open files created by all previous versions, but save files only in its own format, with a suffix of "".msX"", where X is the version number (7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12...). This is intentional, of course. Besides, all versions but 7 save files in a compressed format. ☭共产主义万岁★ ""
000d4f120d5a7303 일이삼사오육칠팔구하고십이요 에헤헤 으헤 으헤 으허허
000d60becb7d1a67 I've deleted the page , as we have no evidence that you are the person named on that page, and its content goes against Wikipedia's policies for the use of user pages.
000fc381d4895598 "== Nation Radio - request for comment ==
Hi Dravecky, I'm just contacting a couple of editors with more specialist knowledge to resolve a discussion at Talk:Nation Radio about naming a broadcast area. I'd be interested in your feedback. Thanks"
000ff37cf57ab537 """ (per your user page)"
001068b809feee6b ""
==balance==
This page has one sentence about the basic definition of the word, and a huge amount about the slang/profane uses. Perhaps the former should be extended; is there no information about female dogs available beyond their name? This is an encyclopaedia, not a dictionary.
i feel that whoever is looking this definition up is very appropiate and should be deleted from wikipedia...IMMEDIATLY. this word is used very often and is also a very ""mean"" word. i belive that is majorly true. very much so. okay so, the good meaning is a female dog. BITCH !!!!!!!!!It also stands for the name Brittany Fellows—Preceding unsigned comment added by
==etymology==
The word bitch is from the Old Norse Bikkjuna meaning ""female of the dog"" of unknown origin, Grimm derives the Old Norse words from Lapp Pittja, But OED notes that ""the converse is equally possible.""
The adj. Bitchy was first seen in 1925.
The verb meaning to complain in 1930.
Slang Bitchen ""good"" is attested to the 1950's
== reclaiming the word bitch ==
The word bitch is actually only offencive in American and Canadian English. In most other English variants bitch maintains it's correct definition - female canine. People have argued that bitch is different because it is used as an insult - but so is ""pig"", ""dog"", ""cow"" and others. These are not considered profane, so why is bitch? As far as I am concerned, there is nothing to ""reclaim"" as bitch simply means a female canine.
It may be used as a pejorative or descriptor - that does not make it a profanity.
It should definately say something about Kyle Vanderweilen and all his bitchin Is there any particular evidence of women ""reclaiming"" the word bitch in the 90s? Can anyone point to articles on this, etc.? The song is definitely interesting and belongs here, but doesn't actually reclaim the word ""bitch"" any more than it reclaims the word ""sinner.""
Also, I don't really understand the last paragraph and it sucks I was going to try and clear it up, but I realized I don't know what it means. Can someone point to a source that lays out the argument about bitches, fertility and patriarchy more clearly?
:We don't need articles at all as I there are definitely enough examples (even outside of the 90s). Missy Elliot cleary and repeatedly reclaims the word, for instance, ""She's a Bitch"".
::References are fine just the name ""Missy Elliot"" got me to find a quote of a rolling stone review that mentioned ""reclaiming"" the word. In fact, if some one knows more about her, it might be interesting to add a section on her work and on how it relates to women/slurs more generally within hip-hop.
:::How relevant is this reclamation? It seems to me poison for a woman to use an epithet which still strongly connotes despised traits. I don't see how using a word connoting ""querolous"", ""spiteful"", and ""malicious"" can be empowering. But I don't know; life's a bitch.
::::It stems from a reaction to the prevalence of tagging any woman who doesn't adhere to a certain standard of femininity as a bitch. To use a literary example, in the novel The Handmaid's Tale the narrator related the feeling that, whenever she outsmarted a man, she could almost hear him calling her a bitch in his mind, even her own husband. -
:::::That literary reaction you recited is jealousy; men have names for other men who outsmart them too, but, not having a word like ""bitch"" for them, they have to resort to a greater variety of pejoritive epithets. Though you haven't been specific, I think that standard of femininity you referred to is a pretext for subordination, which both sexes often strive to impose on the other, but men have traditionally had more power. Because it is such a popular epithet in slang, the connotations of ""bitch"" are diffuse, though still commonly pernicious. I think bitch, in itself, is not chiefly a denunciation to punish women who do not conform to that standard, but rather a contemptuous word often used for it.
:::::However, I still don't see the point of reclamati"
0011c58fcfd6bf91 ""
*@EdJohnston. Your question was about figures in summary. Here are a few points about this.
#Yes, the number of victims is important in an article about political repression. Therefore, the number (or a range of numbers) should be provided in the introduction.
#The numbers of people ""killed"" and the number of people ""who died as a result of Communist policies"" are different. The second number is significantly greater: it is more than 60 million (rather than 20 million) in the Soviet Union alone according to The Guinness Book of Records.
#I did not see any estimates of the number of people killed by all Communist regimes except ""Black book"", which qualifies as a secondary RS written by a group of European historians. It tells exactly this: ""100 million people killed by all Communist regimes"". They note that the number is approximate, which also should be noted in the introduction. If there are any other secondary RS that tell ""N million people killed by all Communist regimes"", they must be also used to obtain a range of numbers.
#As a side note to others, it is grossly inappropriate to discuss sanctions at article talk pages. If you think that sanctions are needed, please go to appropriate administrative noticeboards and report your concerns there. ""
0011cefc680993ba REDIRECT Talk:Mi Vida Eres Tú
0011ef6aa33d42e6 ""
I'm not convinced that he was blind. Where is this documented? It's possible that he was just what we'd call ""Legally blind"" ie didn't have great vision, and that the name ""Blind Blake"" is an exaggerated moniker. Although I have no proof I've got a feeling that him being legally blind is more likely than totally blind. Of course I've got no evidence to back that thing up.""
0012706ac77a7b37 "== Thanks for the Barnstar! ==
Thank you for awarding me with the RickK Anti-Vandilism Barnstar!"
0012bb72f20ae971 ""
== Ref: SS Ponzi Scheme ==
Hi Padillah,
It is not my opinion that I am trying to impose here, although it may appear to be so. I am just highlighting the fact that it remains controversial whether it is or isn't a Ponzi Scheme (even if a legal one), so you cannot state as a fact that it is not a Ponzi Scheme (I saw the reference, and the perpetrator itself cannot be treated as a ""reliable source""). In fact, claiming it is not a Ponzi Scheme seems to be an opinion in itself. My point is that a claim should not be made either way, and the edit in question just accomplishes that.
Thank you,
Virat""
0012bbcbd6958302 ""
Look, Gerry Spence has NOT ""never lost a case, criminal or civil."" That is simply untrue. He prevailed in two cases about which he wrote books (Silkwood and the Miss Wyoming vs. Penthouse cases). He won both massively at trial, and both were completely overturned. In 1985 he represented then-15 year old Michael Jones charged with murder as a juvenile. In Oregon the trial was a criminal trial in EVERY sense except that the juvenile neither received a jury (which Spence argued at the time he was entitled to) and the sentencing authority then ended at age 21. Chief Justice Alex Kozinski of the 9Th U.S. Circuit court mentions the arrogance of trial lawyers who claim to ""never have lost a cast."" ""n19. There's one famous exception: Gerry Spence, at least to hear him tell it. See Gerry Spence, Gunning for Justice 47 (1982). But see Sherrie F. Nachman, True Lies, Starring Gerry Spence, Am. Law., Sept. 1994, at 13 (disputing Spence's claim made in Gunning for Justice and widely reported by the media, and quoting one victorious Spence adversary, ""It's a lie."").""""
00137446b1aec28c "== September 20th Truce ==
According to several news sources, a truce was reached in Minsk last night. http://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-29290246"
0013a435effa29bd I'd never think I'd need to say it, but Wikipedia isn't a fansite discussion board. If anything is unannounced by any authority, it might as well be false. MMORPGs are overrated,
0013be435187e84f But this is not the article about government position but about the reaction. Add positions to 2008 Kosovo declaration of independence or Foreign relations of Kosovo.
0013fed3aeae76b7 DJ Robinson is gay as hell! he sucks his dick so much!!!!!
001411adf8f1dd82 "== Dracula's Grandmother ==
Dracula's grandmother was a Bulgarian princess, the sister of Ivan Sratzimir. The links with the lands across the Danube remain largely unexamined. I would appreciate any serious contributions.
(Kaloyan)"
001421530a1aa622 I have been perfectly civil in what quite clearly idiotic trolling.
001426f56de6a49b *I agree with Billfruge. The author describes the unverifiable nature of the two competing etymology theories sufficiently well so as not to mislead any reader, renders an opinion as to which of the two is more likely (and it is clear that this is the author's opinion), and presents the reader with the opportunity to accept either or neither of the two.
00148cabab3f0abd "==Category:Italian Jews==
:Category:Italian Jews, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you."
0015d9af6dbc03c0 "== Someday Never ==
Why was the image deleted? Were there copyright issues?"
00166b5f5bf2d758 "", 5 December 2012 (UTC)
:::The above is, to the best of my knowledge, an accurate disposition of the facts. The only personal opinion I offered appeared in the last sentence: ""Systems of institutionalized racism always result in injustice, and backlash is a predictable result."" Have noted it as such.
:::I think it is inaccurate to say that ""white privilege"" and ""white supremacy"" are interchangable terms. In fact the usefulness of ""white privilege"" as a concept may be rooted in the ""invisible, weightless knapsack"" analogythose who would never entertain white supremacist ideology may still benefit from some degreee of ""white privilege."" 17:40""
0016909ad784fe8d "":I see that you moved to Talat Hamdani. Perhaps you had not read the MfD notice on the page, which says ""please do not blank, merge, or move it, or remove this notice, while the discussion is in progress"". (My emphasis.)
""
0016b94c8b20ffa6 I WILL BURN YOU TO HELL IF YOU REVOKE MY TALK PAGE ACCESS!!!!!!!!!!!!!
0016ec04bb0f869a "== Hebrean-Judeo-Christian ==
What is Hebrean-Judeo-Christian) supposed to mean?"
00177176f33f587e "== Can you work your magic? ==
Hi. I was wondring if you had time to help out with Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/W. E. B. Du Bois/archive1. Any input would be appreciated: a quick scan or a full review. I've noticed your work before and I respect your skills. Thanks."
0017d4d47894af05 :Fuck off, you anti-semitic cunt. |
001804717513d860 Puwersa ng Masa!
0018af86a1bdfef3 ""== Quidam Software ==
Hello Stifle,
I understand why you erased the article about Quidam Software. It was too short, without references etc. But actually it is my first article on wikipedia and I don't know how to ask that the article is ""under construction"". Can you let me know please?
Thanks for your help.—Preceding unsigned comment added by •
:Thanks for your message and welcome to Wikipedia. Please sign your messages by typing ~~~~ at the end.
:Quidam software was deleted under the criteria for speedy deletion, specifically number 1 under Articles, as it was a short article with little or no context.
:Articles on Wikipedia should generally be more than a single sentence long and need to include citations from reliable sources to comply with the verifiability policy.
:You shouldn't put an article up before you've got these added, but if you want to work on an article for a while, you can create a user subpage and work on the article there, before moving it to the desired article title when it's ready.
:I hope that this experience hasn't put you off and that you enjoy being a Wikipedian. If you require further help using Wikipedia, please place a message on Wikipedia:Help desk or just put and a message on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to help. ""
0019400581a6fe32 ""
:There are now four references, including Britannica, giving the correct date, which is getting silly. You complain in your edit summary that you can't find them, so I've added quotes to two, to help you out. After that you're on your own: WP:SOURCEACCESS has more on this. I'm happy to concede that Britannica, alone, mentions the date you offer (but without explaining the context), so that's one of the sources I've expanded with a quote specifically mentioning 23 August.
:Russian Wikipedia has: ""23 августа силы 14-го танкового корпуса армии Паулюса вышли к Волге севернее Сталинграда"" (""August 23 forces of the 14th Tank Corps, Army [of] Paulus, reached the Volga north of Stalingrad""), cited from the war diary of Colonel-General Franz Haider.
: ""
00199e012d99a8b9 Her body is perfect. Face, boobs, hips, all of it.
001a9a0fce445525 :::::I am simply relating that the research and professional organizations are essentially unanimous in indicating that these laws are not having the intended effects, and that they may even be making the problem worse. You are entitled to your opinion, of course, but your comment is making me concerned about your ability to keep your biases out of your edits.
001acc29b248cb6d REDIRECT Talk:Kemp's thicket rat
001ade31463efdfe ""
:::::See above section titled ""Finsbury Park Mosque and Islamic hatred."" Lestrade""
001af79497a01e91 um, taking a shot here... Um lets say Three separate people whos wills are to each other.
001bb624469de607 ""
::Use of ""assisted suicide"" to refer to aid in dying is inaccurate in fourth distinctive ways. First, it was coined by Catholic activists disputing Oregon's Measure 16 in 1994 - so it carries a political bias. Second, the laws in Oregon, Washington and Vermont each do not contain the term ""assisted suicide"" but use aid in dying. Third, assisting a suicide remains illegal in all three states - and also Montana and New Mexico. No state attorney general or county district attorney has charged any physician or pharmacist who acted within the aid in dying laws of the three states. Finally, describing people who use aid in dying, such as Brittany Maynard, suicides grossly misrepresents their experience and devalues both their lives and deaths. Continued usage of the biased and inaccurate term should be amended throughout Wikipedia. ""
001c368c738a814f See also . . . http://arxiv.org/abs/hep-ph/0009204
001c86f5bceccb32 "== Hello ==
Fuck off my Pagan you bareback mancunt pig slut."
001cba5e79b6b91e "== Must be said ==
You are by far the most disrespectful, malicious, destructive user in all of Wikipedia. It's people like you, who abuse their power, that make this site Defunct or obsolete"
001ceacfd4ffa469 "May 2010
Please stop. If you continue to delete or edit legitimate talk page comments, as you did at Talk:Deepwater Horizon oil spill, you may be blocked for vandalism.
:If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices."
001ceebc43e65027 "== BrandonYusofToropov has requested mediation over a conflict with you ==
Ed, [User:BrandonYusofToropov|BrandonYusofToropov] has requested mediation over a conflict with you. I am willing to mediate the dispute. Do you accept? If so, please end me an email at [email protected]."
001d2f65ea6f4163 "" August 2006 (UTC)
:::::A simple ""you're wrong"" would have sufficed.No need to try and make me look like an idiot 13:01, 10""
001d39c71fce6f78 ""
:That is ridiculous. Unless there's a good and non-disingenuous response, I would absolutely agree with you blocking indef outright. Falsifying sources should simply never be tolerated. // ""
001d739c97bc2ae4 How dare you vandalize that page about the HMS Beagle! Don't vandalize again, demon!
001deac5571d5186 "I moved this from ""Quebec diaspora"" to this title because disapora is a description applicable only to Jews. "
001e131e1a08845a knock it off you bloody CWI trot
001eba8bbe728e54 aapn bhtla aanand jhala..
001ed6d4be00614b ""
*** Not via archive.org, but I can and have read the petition myself, online. It's a primary source (meaning, a letter from you, the subject, not a secondary source), and even if not blacklisted, can't really be used, but I've entered some followup questions to admins to get more feedback. (I know the whole story it's a question of what we can include on Wiki, per WP:V and WP:RS.) We do have text mentioning the petition from The Guardian, cited in the article now. ""
001eff4007dbb65b ::No, he is an arrogant, self serving, immature idiot. Get it right.
001f1f993acff9a3 "== Continued Vandalism ==
This user continues to vandalize articles. It should be blocked from editing."
0020376025dd8092 ""
==Proornis==
Thank you for adding an entry for Proornis on wikipedia. I have added a bit more info and correct some of your edits:
* try to use the Taxobox in a correct manner. In your case you added dromaesauridae as a family of archaeornithiformes and there was no mention of the genus and species.
* don't overcategorized your article. Proornis to my knowledge is considered a basal bird and do not really fit in the dinosaur or coelurosaur categories.
* add references whenever possible
* start an article by defining the subject. For instance: ""Proornis"" is an extinct genus of bird discovered in North Korea.
I hope you will be able to follow these guidelines when you will be creating a new article. If you need help, let me know. ""
002046a2e5669735 "::ICES could hardly be labelled as a very obviously pro seal hunting organization. The scientific base of seal management is the responsibility of ICES, covered out by the most prominent seal researchers in the world. I would guess even you accept that as a NPOV.
::Nevertheless I appreciate your new strategy of adding information even though I still find it rather biased. Your Canadian focus makes you forget that the Atlantic cod is more than the weak North-West Atlantic cod stock. I intend to make a few corrections if you don't mind. But don't worry, I will not delete sections (like you just did). I will however ask you to be a little bit more reserved using the very touchy term vandalism when people edit articles."
002093eb829e4e1b *:That's not a very good reason not to move it, though. People don't use 'color' in the UK either, do they? Keeping it at Cor anglais is right per ENGVAR, however.
00209bd924d80a3e "":::If you email me I'll reply with a copy of the Pignotti pdf. It's not at all controversial that EFT show more of an effect than some treatments in some conditions. The problem is that EFT doesn't show more of an effect than talking and tapping your arm or talking and tapping a doll.
:::Second, I think you're not being quite forthright when you describe the accupressure citations as ""controvert[ing] this conclusion"". In fact, you removed the last two and silently changed the other two. If you want to change text that someone has already responded to, please use and <\s>, like this, so it doesn't look like you're being sneaky. This also looks like you're throwing in every citation you can find without reading or understanding them, hoping something will stick. If you recall, I asked for one pdf and we're now at numbers 16 and 17 and you're just now learning what the issues are. And, after taking a look, neither one of your new studies has anything to do with establishing the existence of ""energy systems in the body"".
:::I'm not sure what to say at this point. The most charitable interpretation I can come up with is that you're not reading what you're citing: you're either cutting and pasting from google or some other source. Alternatively you're reading all of these papers but have no understanding as to what they contain. Either way, you might want to consider editing articles that better play to your strengths.
:::As to Feinstein's rejoinder: it's available here. This is an excellent lesson in tapdancing:
::::[The studies he found] lend[] support for the efficacy of tapping while mentally attuning to an emotional difficulty. Despite the design flaws found in some of the studies, the preponderance of evidence shows energy psychology interventions to be efficacious.
:::The first sentence is true, but he neglects to explain why arm-tapping and doll-tapping have equal efficacy. The second sentence equates talking and tapping with ""energy psychology"" which has the additional baggage of energy fields that can evidently migrate to arms and dolls.
:::So after 18 citations what we have is the suggestion that a particular kind of talking associated with some sort of physical ritual can be more helpful than other treatments in some situations. I would be comfortable including the two Feinstein reviews if the shortcomings pointed out in Pignotti are highlighted, and I think Waite (2003) deserves a paragraph. I don't see an argument for including any of these other citations. If you want to make such an argument, please be sure to read the citation first and be able to summarize how the citation supports the point you want to make.
""
0020baa22b95d1b0 ""
You wrote:
You will need to cite reliable sources for the assertions ""far too large to be chemical"" and ""no endothermic storage events"". I do not think any source can conclusively estabish either point . . .
It is very easy to establish both points, and there are hundreds of papers with proof of them.
1. The limits of chemical storage (electron bonds) are well understood. The most energy dense chemicals, such as gasoline, store 4 to 8 eV per atom. Cold fusion reactions have often produced far more than this, ranging from ~100 to ~100,000 eV per atom of the material in the cell, and in all cases there is no chemical fuel before the reaction, and no chemical ash after it finishes. Cell with a few grams of inert material in them have produced hundreds of megajoules of heat as much as several kilograms of gasoline. if you were to burn the cell contents, they would produce only a tiny fraction of the heat. In fact, you could burn the cell, the table, and all books in the room and still get that much chemical energy. Therefore, chemistry is ruled out.
2. Any calorimeter can measure an endothermic event as accurately as it measures an exothermic event. For example, all calorimeters used in these studies show the endothermic formation of Pd-D at the beginning of the experiment. Since the calorimeters shows the exothermic excess heat, they would also show the endothermic storage that proceeds it. They have never done this. The heat balance is always zero before the heat bursts, and after.
- Jed Rothwell
HERE IS more useful information that someone keeps erasing:
Please note that Cal Tech (Lewis et al.) is a false negative, as pointed out by Noninski, Miles and Fleischmann. This is described in several papers, for example this one, p. 20:
http://lenr-canr.org/acrobat/MilesMisoperibol.pdf
Also, the name is Julian Schwinger (with ch). See:
http://lenr-canr.org/acrobat/SchwingerJcoldfusiona.pdf
- Jed Rothwell, Librarian, LENR-CANR.org""
0020e1f3fafd4b17 "==Image copyright problem with Image:ATT2066652.jpg==
Thanks for uploading Image:ATT2066652.jpg. However, the image may soon be deleted unless we can determine the copyright holder and copyright status. The Wikimedia Foundation is very careful about the images included in Wikipedia because of copyright law (see Wikipedia's Copyright policy).
The copyright holder is usually the creator, the creator's employer, or the last person who was transferred ownership rights. Copyright information on images is signified using copyright templates. The three basic license types on Wikipedia are open content, public domain, and fair use. Find the appropriate template in Wikipedia:Image copyright tags and place it on the image page like this: {{TemplateName}}.
Please signify the copyright information on any other images you have uploaded or will upload. Remember that images without this important information can be deleted by an administrator. If you have any questions, feel free to contact me, or ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you."
0020f1b79913e7c0 :Thanks for the comment about Wiki-defenderness. I like that one. I usually wikiling Wiki-defender. I agree that at first he was somewhat innocent but now have my doubts as he is being really agressive about the whole matter.
0021e57e6b9cb3d9 "Can't figure out why he redshirted. No sources. ///WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR)
*"
0021f7c457937f18 ""
* You used the word ""saloon"" to describe the car. In American English, a saloon is like a bar or pub, so I believed it to vandalism. I now understand that saloon in British English is a sedan-like car. Feel free to re-edit the article to include the information, although I would suggest citing (WP:REF) the article supporting your acceleration stats. Cheers. ""
002261b0415c4f9d ::You're funny. Ugly? We're dudes on computers, moron. You are quite astonishingly stupid.
0023317d123b6fcb It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from . Please be careful not to remove content from Wikipedia without a valid reason, which you should specify in the edit summary or on the article's talk page. Take a look at our welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. ||Suggestions?
00234e493cedb3e1 "Agree, but that's not the issue. The queston is, in everyday English, does first amendent refer primarily to the US Constitution, or is it ambiguous? My belief remains that even fifth amendment is ambiguous, and first amendment even more so.
*"
0023f3f84f353bce ""
== Main towns that are not so main ==
I know that you love to write a one sentence article. But, if you want to do that, please, at least do it properly. Stop saying ""X is a main town in Y, Z"". What is so main about obscure towns? ""
002586bdf3280356 ""
my comments follow, bluewillow991967 -
I'm sorry if I wasn't sufficiently clear.
On the specific subject of ""first serial"" versus ""reprints"" I have an interest because I write commercial fiction for a living.
I'm not saying a contract would contain a ""non-standard definition"" of first serial, original, or reprint.
I'm saying that you quite clearly do not understand the *standard* definitions in publishing commercial fiction of first serial, original, and reprint.
""Is"" means the same thing in plain English as it does in intellectual property terminology. ""Reprint,"" ""original"" and ""first serial"" mean much more specific things in intellectual property terminology than they do in colloquial English.
It may well be suitable to call a female crotch a vagina in a personal blog, but in an encyclopedia article talking about female genitalia, it matters that the colloquially used term is factually incorrect and the correct terminology should be used. If the correct terminology would be confusing to readers, then a hyperlink to a correct definition may be in order.
You are, by analogy, effectively insisting that a set of labia is a vagina.
(Sorry, clearest example I could think of where the commonly accepted vernacular term shouldn't be used in an encyclopedia article because it's wrong.)
""
0025a91b6955f1a5 ""
== Halliday ==
Good to see another contributor to his article. If SFL is your thing, you might consider joining the Wikipedia:WikiProject_Linguistics/SFLSFL taskforce. Thanks. ""
0025c49d87d9a18f ""
::: That Stephen Barrett is not Board Certified is not a viewpoint. It is a fact (a well documented one at that). I don't see how WP:PROMINENCE applies. ""
00260d8dfcc29827 Stone Sour sucks anus
0026c91011e3ae35 :Could you do a precis of the material instead of just downloading a whole lot of stuff from somewhere else on the internet? I am only one editor here, but I do feel that the material you have provided could be cut down to fit the format of this article. More info could be provided in a seperate wikipedia article if necessary.
0027160ca62626bc "Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Kmart, you will be blocked from editing.
:If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings."
0027c21bc4637efd I was merely apologising for my interference ;)
00281611ff9c0123 ::::Uhm people, just a short reality check. Question: we have verified that 90% of what this article is based on is bogus, entered by sockpuppets, targetted to dupe casual visitors into believing that this individual is important. Based on this evidence, why do you continue to invest countless hours to find info about a bogus fraudster? Do you really think your time is well invested here? I really don't get it, by know, many of you must have invested more hours to debunk and enhance the article that original sockpuppeteer has invested himself. Do you really think that your time and work is worth it? Do you really think that working on such a small, unimportant article in the big picture is worth your time? I'm not flaming or cursing, I'm genuinely interested what inner fire you girls and guys still keep on going with this article. Don't you just have had - enough? Your time must be in the dozens of hours already - for those few lines? Is that worth it? Aren't there other article that deserve more attention? Like I said, I'm curious why you guys don't think your time can be invested into something else with more value? Do you really think that your work is invested well here? As I said, I am really interested in your answers, not flaming or anything.
0028b002aacc20cc ""
== CatDiffuse ==
I think the best idea would be to check its whatlinkshere every now and then and make sure the tag only shows up in cats where it's appropriate. Frankly I don't think there's much point to the tag since most people don't read cat pages, just cat contents. ""
0028bca06339e02f ""
== Cloud feedback ==
Why is cloud feedback only under the positive feedbacks? Just about any paper states that it can be both. That the IPCC states that it is ""more likely a positive than a negative feedback"" doesn't change that. ""
0028c5110f1f896b "Avg, plenty of Greeks love the King. Stop acting like all Greeks hate him. You just parrot what the government tells us via their 'media.' We Greeks asked George I to be our King. We supported them. They reclaimed much of our lands. We voted to keep them numerous times. In the 1930's by 97% vote!
Also, he tried to overthrow the dictators. Read a book. The Greek government is the biggest liars. The US didn't want us to have our King and our claim to Constantinople/Asia Minor. He is a direct descendant of five Greek imperial (Byzantine) dynasties (Monomachos, Comnenos, Laskaris, Angelos, and Paleologos)."
00291ce25a490740 "== Roman general Agricola and the Battle of Mons Graupius ==
In the Total war#Early History section, it claims that the Ancient Romans practiced total war in Caledonia (now Scotland). However, neither Gnaeus Julius Agricola nor Battle of Mons Graupius confirm or even address these claims of noncombatants being killed. |"
00293511a845d344 This is a REDIRECT discussion page. Please do not leave article related discussion here. Please go to the article's discussion page.
002a3ebaaa51f17a * Maybe you should have a read of that one too. Since I've decided to assist with articles on wikipedia, you have made the experience nothing but hell you piece of shit. Pull your finger out of your bureaucratic arse and rot in hell.
002af5c4c7f08722 "== Second issue ==
I'm thinking we need a taxonomy section; there are things that aren't really as clear as they maybe could be. Why is/what specific findings about the fossils places R. narmadensis in the subfamily Carnotaurinae? Why 'princely lizard of the Narmada'; is that significant as to the stature/behavior/predatorial prowess of R. narmadensis? If there is anything more precise on its taxonomy, such as that, it would be great to add."
002b3c51eb2cb207 ""
== Hey man ==
I saw you removing all the fair use images from Jimi Hendrix discography. It's a bitch to do it, but good job doing the right thing. Right now I'm going through a lot of artist and discography pages looking for album covers to get rid of and other bad images. You got my back. Keep up the good work.++++ ""
002b41238214233e : But there's only one EP and one album, which is really also an EP. Even in the 70s, it would have been considered an EP, although it could have been considered an album by length in the 50s or the 60s. This is my point. They don't have two full-length albums.
002b92bbe21a6af4 ""
:Hi Olly, by moderator do you mean administrator? There all no official requirements needed to become an administrator, however, the Wikipedia community must decide in favor of your request in order to be granted the rights. Therefore, in order to have a successful request, you must show experience and trustworthiness throughout your edits over a period of time. This period of time has not set length, but more experience is favored over less. I hope this helps,   ""
002c586b0af3792c "পরিচয়
নাম-মোঃফরহাদ ইসলাম
পিতা-মোঃ শাহজাহান মিয়া
মাতা-মোছাঃফাহিমা বেগম
গ্রামঃ জানকিপুর সলই মন্ডল পাড়া
ইউনিয়নঃনিলাখিয়া
উপজেলাঃবকশীগঞ্জ
জেলাঃজামালপুর
বিভাগঃঢাকা
।।।।।।।।।।।।।।।
আমি ১৯৯৭ সালের ২০.জানুয়ারি আমার নানার বাড়িতে জন্মগ্রহণ করি। ২০০০ সালে নিজ গ্রামের স্কুলে ভর্তি হয় এবং ওই স্কুল থেকেই প্রাইমারি লেবেল শেষ করি।২০০৬ সালে ভর্তি নিজ ইউনিয়নের নিলাখিয়া আর জে পাইলট উচ্চ বিদ্যালয়ে ৬ষ্ঠ শ্রেনীতে এবং সেখানে ক্লাস এইট পর্যন্ত পড়ি।। পরে ভর্তি হই বকশীগঞ্জ টি.ভি.আই এ সেখান থেকে ২০১২ সালে এস এস সি পাশ করি।তার পর টেক্সটাইল এ ডিপ্লোমা করার জন্য ভর্তি হলাম শহীদ আব্দুর রব সেরনিয়াবাত টেক্সটাইল ইঞ্জিনিয়ারিং কলেজ,বরিশাল। বর্তমানে আমি এই কলেজে ৬ষ্ঠ সেমিস্টার এর এক জন ছাত্র।।"
002cd3ed1c9c7555 "== scholarly corroboration of folklore ==
My understanding is that folklore can provide clues to history, medicine, and other areas of scholarship that can be verified, in part, through archaeology, biology, and so on, but I don't have any sources handy or for which I recall titles. If anyone does, please add a section to the article about scholarly confirmation.
We could do the same for disconfirmation, but there's plenty on that in many places, usually in the form of debunking based on a lack of scientific evidence, which is a weaker standard than positive evidence.
Thanks."
002eef919d2f8410 "==Redirects==
トレイン・トレイン, トレイン トレイン, トレイントレイン, トレイン-トレイン, トレイン+トレイン, トレイン*トレイン, トレイン, トレイン, トレィン☆トレィン, Torein・Torein, Torein Torein, Torein-Torein, Torein+Torein, Torein*Torein, Torein, Torein, Torein☆Torein, Train・Train, Train☆Train, トレイン—トレイン, Torein—Torein, Train—Train, トレイン–トレイン, Torein–Torein, Train–Train
should redirect here"
002fb627b19c4c0b ""::I respect your point of view, and when this discussion originated on 8th April I would have tended to agree with you. However today this is now being mentioned by multiple expert sources. The opinion of F1 driver Pastor Maldonado is ""The rules are the same for everyone, so you need to avoid incidents ... But at the same time [the threat of penalties means] you cannot race, you need to only stay on track and wait for problems."" (original article is behind paywall on Autosport). This issue was also discussed and recognized by expert commentators during Sky Sports F1 Chinese GP Free Practice 1. I will be adding this section back to the article with appropriate references.
""
002fec87c1465bd8 i would like to take a moment of my time to apologize for leaving my workstation long enough for an idiot to use my IP to be an idiot... it wont happen again, i promise. im sure he meant this hyde, who, as it turns out, is male. he has been explained to why that was vandalism, and why obsessing over Jrock is silly.
003044a2c35274b6 "السلام عليكم و رحمة الله و بركاته الا الجميع
تفضلوا جميعا"
0030a3760c6e27f3 ""
::::::::::::::Another priceless gem from yourself demonstrating your general cluelessness: ,""The fuse rating (and therefore the plug rating in the case of a non-rewireable plug) is determined by the cable attached, not the appliance it will be used with."". Where on earth did you dig that nonsense up from? There are plenty of good examples around, but medium to large switch mode power supplies are often supplied with nominally 3 Amp cable in a moulded on plug, many with an IEC 60320 C7 type plug (rated by that standard at 2.5 Amps). According to you, the plug should therefore be fitted with a 3 Amp fuse (determined by the cable). If you did so, you would never get any but the smallest power supplies running. You have to fit a 5 Amp fuse because the very large >40 Amp momentary inrush current lasts long enough that it will blow a 3 Amp fuse. The cable and plug can retain their original ratings because the inrush current will not harm them. The rating of the fuse is determined by much much more than the cable size alone. Indeed, the type of power supply that is built into a plug usually has no fuse at all! 17:17""
0030e3ba49006440 ""This is just bizarre. Ani Medjool's abuse of wikipedia rules gets rewarded, and then he awards you a barnstar. WTF? Anyhow a new person, adept at ridicule, has joined in the conversation at falafel. Sigh...
""
00314b8e8314b445 :::They're good enough that they can no longer be considered for speedy deletion. The rationales are acceptable; the actual use may still be an issue needing review, and that I would take to FFD if necessary.
00316955ef4b0fee ""
:Understandable. I've had a lot of problems with him in the past, too, particularly in regard to copyright violations and, more recently, grammar and style. But, as far as this issue goes: What, do you just want me to block both of you for 24 hours? — '''''' ""
0031c900f2018470 ""
Firstly still making undiffable edits and refusing to use edit summaries is becoming a behavioural issue that will need to be escalated if it doesn't stop. Gun, I really don't understand why you find it so hard to follow the basic standards of behaviour required to edit in a collaborative environment.
Secondly, ""announcing"" changes on someone's talk page doesn't really count as discussing them collaboratively, rather it means you discussed it with me.
Furthermore I told you to go to the NPOV noticeboard to raise the State University vs University issue if you wanted to discuss the issue, which you a) failed to do, b) you removed the disputed tag from the article without a result (as I suggested waiting until later), c) you made yet another diff which contained a large number of other unknown, unknowable and undisucssed changes to the article. <> ""
0031d0649f4a266b ""
==Name in the introductory paragraph==
I've always been told that using ""Dr."" & ""Ph.D."" in the same name was incorrect, as the Ph.D. automatically conferred the status of doctor. However, I'm not sure what to do in this case. Since he is so well-known as ""Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr.,"" the normal approach of dropping ""Dr."" and keeping ""Ph.D."" doesn't seem to be the best answer, even though it's the one most style guides seem to endorse. Would someone more intimately familliar with the article like to take a swing at changing it, or suggesting an alternative? ""
0031db73bf0939c3 to fuck you and ur family
00325303c23588a4 "== Mrpainkiller, Neurophyte and Jean-Philippe ==
After a complaint at intervention against vandalism, I protected the article VampireFreaks.com. It was either that, or block all of you for disruption and personal attacks. I will unprotect the article in the morning. In the meantime, please consider the following:
*Reverting another user's talk page is pretty rude. There is a policy conflict between the user talk page policy, which says users can blank or archive warnings (although archiving is preferred by the community) and the vandalism policy, which says that removing warnings given to you is vandalism. I don't agree with the vandalism point of view, and I haven't seen a lot of support for it lately except among people who are fighting amongst themselves for other reasons. If someone deletes a warning they've obviously seen it. If you are concerned about someone's edits, use a verbose edit summary so that even if the warning is removed the edit summary will be visible.
*I understand there is a view among two of you that Mrpainkiller7's edits are detrimental to the article. There are lots of right ways to deal with this, including editing by consensus, Request for comment on the article or the user, Mediation, and third opinion. I'm not going to judge the content, but fighting (wherever it occurs) is the wrong way to deal with the problem.
*Personal attacks are not to be tolerated. Please deal with the content of edits, not character.
I'm leaving this message with each of you. If you keep fighting over talk pages, I suppose I or another admin will eventually figure it's time to block someone. Unless you are positive that you are 100% right and the other guy is 100% wrong, you should probably try and work this out peacefully in case the admins don't see things your way."
003260a50813dba9 "== hrthrtdghrsdtghtrsdhtrhdgthjrtgh ==
fffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffhngviudfhgoiuerhgukfhkjgeruighervyfdohgobvijgfjgojfdhgjofhglkfhboerhgbdhoifdtyklerbhlkjhbdjgbojtgofgjrfjhlrkhilebotrjbh9jtrohibjrtlhujty;junmoytijoryjhigfjhgfjnifgjgfhkljtgilhjfdojgfdojgfkjngfdlkjgnklfgikfvihgifbfhbgkufbdsukfgglkdhvureuhgiurhgh4irtgyrehgui4t7iryggoifhgo54oerygtjeiygut8gopfe8gig89fjhg9r8tyr8hygb7hruegfigust8g0r0retugrijtrir6tihviurhgnviurwt,kcnguiergvknfgioerpjgklfupgrojgoirutkdhgl;rehgljkgyuorihfgiurwyhoug6y3oi4hg98w6u jtgnkjryt9jgoidug059jgiufd7teurjg98etujoijfgiosdug 0945ojtg0o8reuyjurfi ug945uj ygoip5uj5tg;eoiu495yp;w8y5urtg9ui8hui9g85w4mftmuv89tny0uvg8ytihguihfdkjvhu4krngkfdjs hgkjfghoeruygrhy goh tgoiugkiughgvhghghghhgghhghghghghghghghhhhhgtherkgheefjgsefdghh"
0032e594263182fc HI FRANKIE HOW ARE YOU I HEARD YOU LIKE TO SUCK FAT DICK AND PUT IT IN YOUR EAR WHOLES
00340e8231a91349 ""=Outside input===
*I've given this debate a bit of a read through, and for the most part, it seems clear that although the actual content of many of may be important, they are presented in an extremely PoV manner that IMO smells agenda-pushing. Issues (ii) and (vii) below are prime examples of that, though the rest work as well. The key here that I think GoldDragon needs to understand (and trust me, I have experience with POV pushers) is that Wikipedia is not a place to campaign, all additions to the article need to be entirely factual and presented in a clearly neutral manner - something that seems to have done well. GoldDragon's edits (specifically the ones identified as contentious in this discussion) should be reworked to be presented in a neutral manner, or else removed. In addition, this issue of what is notable enough for inclusion has come up often in my own disputes. The most useful tool I've come up with to deal with this is to ask myself ""Will the average, a-political Torontonian find this information useful?"" Things like the election sign business for example; while interesting to those who are intensely involved, if you were to ask the average person, they'd probably say something along the lines of ""Who cares?"" That, I find, is a good measure of notability when dealing with trivia in politician articles
==""
00372dfdd531fc6c "== black mamba ==
It.is ponious snake of the word and but it not kills many people but king cobra kills many people in India"
0037738477182b8e "2005 (UTC)
::::: Fuck you, Jim. Everyone knows I'm female. IJzeren Jan, Jim is harassing me on the basis of a medical chromosomal condition I was born with. 15:46, August 10,"
00379bb7b2b2e644 "==September 30, 2005==
Back to your old tricks, eh? Stop it or you'll be blocked."
00380df890f6b894 "= Tomahawk Chop =
Need to add a section to talk about the bone-in ribeye steak, which is referred to as a Tomahawk Chop."
00385b9bffdeb9c8 ""
:::::@yash read wp:VANDAL '''''' ""
0038a47d8f1bb327 "u suck u suck u suck u suck u sucku suck u suck u suck u suck u u suck u suck u suck u suck u sucksucku suck u suck u suck u suck u sucku suck u suck uu suck u suck u suck u suck u suck suck u suck u sucku suck u suck u suck u suck u suck
u suck u suck u suck u suck u sucku suck u suck u suck u suck u u suck u suck u suck u suck u sucksucku suck u suck u suck u suck u sucku suck u suck uu suck u suck u suck u suck u suck suck u suck u sucku suck u suck u suck u suck u suck
u suck u suck u suck u suck u sucku suck u suck u suck u suck u u suck u suck u suck u suck u sucksucku suck u suck u suck u suck u sucku suck u suck uu suck u suck u suck u suck u suck suck u suck u sucku suck u suck u suck u suck u suck
u suck u suck u suck u suck u sucku suck u suck u suck u suck u u suck u suck u suck u suck u sucksucku suck u suck u suck u suck u sucku suck u suck uu suck u suck u suck u suck u suck suck u suck u sucku suck u suck u suck u su
u suck u suck u suck u suck u sucku suck u suck u suck u suck u u suck u suck u suck u suck u sucksucku suck u suck u suck u suck u sucku suck u suck uu suck u suck u suck u suck u suck suck u suck u sucku suck u suck u suck u suck u suckck u suck"
003994b922637eee Slavery is forbidden in Islam? That seems to run counter to history. Weren't the Mamluks, simply to mention one group, former slaves?
003abee7e2ed7b4b "":Perhaps WP:AN can provide some advice... I'm not quite sure what to do either. — • •
""
003b169a420e3757 ""I notice that you and jehockman have close connection on your talk page. Jehockman edits SEO articles and runs an SEO company(conflict of interest? That is the fox guarding the chicken coup?). Perhaps you should have this sock puppet conversation with jonathan hockman. In my opinion having an SEO masquerade as a wiki editor and using sock puppets to delete other SEO's is gamesmanship and clearly not in the spirit of providing accurate information on wikipedia but rather suppressing it. I just Googled ""seo expert"" and out of 5 million results Mr. Guy is number 3. Not notable? What is your ajenda?
""
003bb366e674a9d4 ""
::No problem. Sorry my question was unclear - do you prefer the three arks picture in the article now, or the log drive photo (linked above) that probably is on Pine Creek - agree Little Pine is too little now. No idea if it was enlarged by a splash dam though, but I agree it looks more Pine than Little Pine. '''''' ""
003c6a7652d31202 Please do move my comment there to legitimize everything. I really don't know how to do things here. all i know is just to edit.
003c73565c434b4b :::Looks like this was an old issue so I took the liberty of removing it. I don't see any difference between the non-spaced version and the spaced version now. The spaced version just makes the intro look very strange.
003d1b257aba9a9e "I saw the cricket match played on 2nd oct 15 at dharamshala india. i just wanted to know why our bowlers do not through dot-balls. our bowlers always throw short balls; i could not understand as to why short balls on which the opponent team scored easy runs. why they do not practise for dot-balls; instead of throwing balls with speed of 147 km/hr they should throw dot-balls say with speed of 130 km/hr so that they may not score easy runs.
My idea is that out of 120 balls 100 were short balls.
please pay special attention on this
i am lay man but click on such things, which are very much"
003d82f5e461ad76 **I just revamped WP:FART, I thought a little housekeeping would give it more street cred.
003d8674aeeec5ec ""
==US==
I'm trying not to just be a whinger and a hand waver here, but it annoys me that there's an entire section devoted to left vs. right politics in the US, yet there's nothing similar regarding the rest of the world. The US bias of wikipedia is very irritating sometimes, though it shouldn't be, as most Internet users are in the U.S. In other words, i'm a whiny European who is too lazy to write a non US section.
From the US> That's easy to fix. Start writing more about non-US views on topics, creating topics, and getting your friends to help. Something that is created by users being called biased only reflects the predominant users posting and thus can easily be remedied.
Also from the US> No, it's NOT so easy to fix. Throughout Wikipedia you will see entries from (obviously) American authors who have no concept of a world view and automatically write from a US perspective without any attempt to qualify their language. What, therefore, tends to happen is that the US view becomes a default with international views living in ghetto-ized paragraphs.
Also from the US> That is actually kind of the problem with Wikipedia all around in the first place, and that is that popular ideas are not necessarily correct. You can have people posting information about the corruptibility of whatever organization, but then the organization can have its people change the entry the next day. —Preceding unsigned comment added by
This entire dicussion lends a great deal of credibilty to the idea that the left-right spectrum poorly represents political and economic views. It seems to me that most of the debate below is equivalent to attempting to define the square root of negative 1 with only real numbers at our disposal. It is painfully obvious that politics is muli-dimensional. The most that can be hoped for here is to describe how the left-right spectrum is used and leave it at that. This should probably be a very short article. —Preceding unsigned comment added by
== Better Chart ==
I think that this page needs a metter chart. Like this one http://studentnewsdaily.com/conservative_vs_liberal_beliefs.shtml
Edit
I actually think that the article, in fact the whole political movement, needs a better definition of ""left-right"". Most political parties cannot adhere to a single category, including revolutionnary movements and far-right groups, as described somewhere else in the discussion.
I suggest a new use of the ""left-right"" compass.
The political compass uses the ""square"" system with two axis x and y (social and économic), which is not very accurate because I know my political ideas, and they tend to be pretty nearer to Mussolini than to Gandhi. Whatever.
What I suggest is a cube!
3 axis x, y and z
Économic
Social
Politic
The first one defines the market system (if any) of a political group.
The second defines the social standing of a political group about the welfare of the people (welfare checks/charity, private/public school/medical system, etc)
The thirds one is, basically, the way a society treats it's people (rehabilitation/punishment, democracy/totaliratism (in which I include Soviet Communism!) etc)
What do you think? —Preceding unsigned comment added by
== Interesting book ==
I came across this book: Left and Right in Global Politics
by Alain Noël and Jean-Philippe Thérien. I haven't read it yet but it seems to be of great interest.
== Removing unneccessary detail ==
I am removing several paragraphs that are unhelpful to the article:
* Edmund Burke - terms left and right not used in UK then
* Adam Smith - terms left and r"