LibVulnWatch / reports /microsoft_autogen_v0.2.0.html
wu981526092's picture
update
8558676
raw
history blame
12.6 kB
<!DOCTYPE html>
<html lang="en">
<head>
<meta charset="UTF-8">
<meta name="viewport" content="width=device-width, initial-scale=1.0">
<title>LibVulnWatch Report: Microsoft AutoGen v0.2.0</title>
<style>
body {
font-family: -apple-system, BlinkMacSystemFont, 'Segoe UI', Roboto, Oxygen, Ubuntu, Cantarell, sans-serif;
line-height: 1.6;
color: #333;
max-width: 1200px;
margin: 0 auto;
padding: 20px;
}
header {
text-align: center;
margin-bottom: 30px;
background-color: #0078d4;
color: white;
padding: 20px;
border-radius: 8px;
}
h1, h2 {
color: #0078d4;
}
header h1, header h2 {
color: white;
}
.risk-domain {
margin-bottom: 40px;
border: 1px solid #ddd;
padding: 20px;
border-radius: 8px;
box-shadow: 0 2px 4px rgba(0,0,0,0.1);
}
.risk-score {
font-size: 24px;
font-weight: bold;
}
.risk-low {
color: green;
}
.risk-medium {
color: orange;
}
.risk-high {
color: red;
}
table {
width: 100%;
border-collapse: collapse;
margin: 20px 0;
}
th, td {
border: 1px solid #ddd;
padding: 12px;
text-align: left;
}
th {
background-color: #f2f2f2;
}
.recommendation {
background-color: #f0f6ff;
padding: 15px;
border-left: 4px solid #0078d4;
margin: 20px 0;
}
.summary-chart {
display: flex;
justify-content: space-between;
margin: 20px 0;
}
.chart-bar {
height: 20px;
background: linear-gradient(to right, green, orange, red);
border-radius: 4px;
position: relative;
width: 100%;
}
.chart-marker {
position: absolute;
height: 30px;
width: 4px;
background-color: black;
top: -5px;
}
</style>
</head>
<body>
<header>
<h1>Vulnerability Assessment Report</h1>
<h2>Microsoft AutoGen v0.2.0</h2>
<p>Assessment Date: May 3, 2025</p>
<p>Assessment ID: ghi789</p>
</header>
<section>
<h2>Executive Summary</h2>
<p>Microsoft AutoGen is an agent framework that enables the development of LLM applications using multiple agents. The library demonstrates moderate risk overall, with specific concerns in security and regulatory compliance domains, while maintaining strong licensing practices.</p>
<div class="summary-chart">
<div style="width: 48%;">
<h3>Overall Risk: Medium (5.4/10)</h3>
<div class="chart-bar">
<div class="chart-marker" style="left: 54%;"></div>
</div>
<div style="display: flex; justify-content: space-between; margin-top: 5px;">
<span>Low Risk</span>
<span>Medium Risk</span>
<span>High Risk</span>
</div>
</div>
<div style="width: 48%;">
<table>
<tr>
<th>Risk Domain</th>
<th>Score</th>
<th>Level</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>License Validation</td>
<td>3.1/10</td>
<td class="risk-low">Low</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Security Assessment</td>
<td>6.7/10</td>
<td class="risk-medium">Medium</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Maintenance Health</td>
<td>2.8/10</td>
<td class="risk-low">Low</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Dependency Management</td>
<td>5.5/10</td>
<td class="risk-medium">Medium</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Regulatory Compliance</td>
<td>7.2/10</td>
<td class="risk-high">High</td>
</tr>
</table>
</div>
</div>
</section>
<div class="risk-domain">
<h2>License Validation</h2>
<p>Risk Score: <span class="risk-score risk-low">3.1 / 10</span> (Low Risk)</p>
<h3>Key Findings</h3>
<ul>
<li>License Type: MIT License</li>
<li>License Compatibility: High - Compatible with most open source and commercial use</li>
<li>Patent Provisions: Standard MIT terms</li>
<li>Attribution Requirements: Standard attribution notice required</li>
</ul>
<h3>Analysis</h3>
<p>Microsoft AutoGen uses the MIT license consistently across its codebase. The license is well-documented and centrally located. All source files contain appropriate copyright notices.</p>
<div class="recommendation">
<h3>Recommendations</h3>
<ul>
<li>Maintain clear attribution requirements in documentation</li>
<li>Consider adding a NOTICE file listing all third-party components and their licenses</li>
</ul>
</div>
</div>
<div class="risk-domain">
<h2>Security Assessment</h2>
<p>Risk Score: <span class="risk-score risk-medium">6.7 / 10</span> (Medium Risk)</p>
<h3>Identified Vulnerabilities</h3>
<table>
<tr>
<th>Vulnerability ID</th>
<th>Description</th>
<th>Severity</th>
<th>Status</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>LVW-AG-2025-001</td>
<td>Code injection via unvalidated message inputs</td>
<td>High</td>
<td>Unresolved</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>LVW-AG-2025-002</td>
<td>Agent termination denial of service</td>
<td>Medium</td>
<td>Partial mitigation</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>LVW-AG-2025-003</td>
<td>Information disclosure through agent memory logs</td>
<td>Medium</td>
<td>Unresolved</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>LVW-AG-2025-004</td>
<td>Prompt injection in agent-to-agent communication</td>
<td>High</td>
<td>Unresolved</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>LVW-AG-2025-005</td>
<td>Insecure default configurations</td>
<td>Medium</td>
<td>Unresolved</td>
</tr>
</table>
<h3>Security Controls</h3>
<ul>
<li>Input validation: Limited implementation</li>
<li>Authentication controls: Basic</li>
<li>Sandboxing: Partial implementation</li>
<li>Rate limiting: Implemented</li>
<li>Output filtering: Not implemented</li>
</ul>
<div class="recommendation">
<h3>Recommendations</h3>
<ul>
<li>Implement comprehensive input validation for all agent communication</li>
<li>Add output filtering to prevent potential information leakage</li>
<li>Improve sandboxing for code execution capabilities</li>
<li>Create secure default configurations</li>
<li>Implement a formal security review process for new features</li>
</ul>
</div>
</div>
<div class="risk-domain">
<h2>Maintenance Health</h2>
<p>Risk Score: <span class="risk-score risk-low">2.8 / 10</span> (Low Risk)</p>
<h3>Key Metrics</h3>
<ul>
<li>Active Contributors: 28</li>
<li>Release Frequency: High (every 3-4 weeks)</li>
<li>Issue Response Time: 1.8 days (average)</li>
<li>Open vs. Closed Issues Ratio: 0.22 (healthy)</li>
<li>Test Coverage: 78%</li>
</ul>
<h3>Governance Model</h3>
<p>The project is maintained by Microsoft with a clear governance structure. The core team is actively involved in development, and Microsoft provides dedicated resources to ensure the project's sustainability.</p>
<div class="recommendation">
<h3>Recommendations</h3>
<ul>
<li>Increase test coverage to at least 85%</li>
<li>Formalize the security vulnerability reporting and response process</li>
<li>Establish clearer guidelines for community contributions</li>
</ul>
</div>
</div>
<div class="risk-domain">
<h2>Dependency Management</h2>
<p>Risk Score: <span class="risk-score risk-medium">5.5 / 10</span> (Medium Risk)</p>
<h3>Dependency Analysis</h3>
<ul>
<li>Direct Dependencies: 18</li>
<li>Transitive Dependencies: 42</li>
<li>Vulnerable Dependencies: 4</li>
<li>Outdated Dependencies: 7</li>
</ul>
<h3>Supply Chain Security</h3>
<p>The project lacks comprehensive dependency scanning in CI/CD pipelines. No formal Software Bill of Materials (SBOM) is available, making it difficult to track transitive dependencies.</p>
<div class="recommendation">
<h3>Recommendations</h3>
<ul>
<li>Update or replace the 4 vulnerable dependencies</li>
<li>Implement automated dependency scanning in CI/CD</li>
<li>Generate and publish SBOM with each release</li>
<li>Add dependency pinning for all production dependencies</li>
<li>Establish a dependency update policy</li>
</ul>
</div>
</div>
<div class="risk-domain">
<h2>Regulatory Compliance</h2>
<p>Risk Score: <span class="risk-score risk-high">7.2 / 10</span> (High Risk)</p>
<h3>Compliance Readiness</h3>
<table>
<tr>
<th>Regulation</th>
<th>Readiness Level</th>
<th>Key Gaps</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>GDPR</td>
<td>Low</td>
<td>Data minimization, storage limitations, processing logs</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>CCPA</td>
<td>Low</td>
<td>User data tracking, deletion mechanisms</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>AI Act (EU)</td>
<td>Very Low</td>
<td>Risk categorization, transparency documentation, human oversight features</td>
</tr>
</table>
<h3>Documentation Quality</h3>
<p>Documentation is minimal regarding regulatory and compliance considerations. No guidance is provided for deploying the library in regulated environments or for ensuring compliance with relevant legal frameworks.</p>
<div class="recommendation">
<h3>Recommendations</h3>
<ul>
<li>Develop comprehensive compliance documentation for high-risk applications</li>
<li>Implement features to support GDPR compliance (data minimization, deletion)</li>
<li>Create audit logging capabilities for agent actions</li>
<li>Add transparency tools for monitoring and explaining agent decisions</li>
<li>Develop implementation guidance for regulated industries</li>
</ul>
</div>
</div>
<footer>
<p>© 2025 LibVulnWatch - This report reflects the state of the library at the time of assessment.</p>
<p>For questions or clarifications, contact: [email protected]</p>
</footer>
</body>
</html>